SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

Form 10-Q

   
(Mark One)
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the quarterly period ended September 29, 200128, 2002
or
 
o
 TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
  For the transition period from           to

Commission file number 0-26946

Intevac, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
California
 94-3125814
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (IRS Employer Identification No.)

3560 Bassett Street

Santa Clara, California 95054
(Address of principal executive office, including zip code)Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:

(408) 986-9888

     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     Yes þ          No o

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS:

     On November 5, 2001 12,003,622September 28, 2002 12,111,642 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, no par value, were outstanding.




TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOMELOSS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 2. Changes in Securities
Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersSecurity-Holders
Item 5. Other Information
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX
EXHIBIT 99.1


INTEVAC, INC.

INDEX

       
No.Page


PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.
 Financial Statements (unaudited)    
  Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets  2 
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive IncomeLoss  3 
  Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows  4 
  Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements  5 
Item 2.
 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  10 
Item 3.
 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk  1821
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures21 
PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.
 Legal Proceedings  1922 
Item 2.
 Changes in Securities  1922 
Item 3.
 Defaults Upon Senior Securities  1923 
Item 4.
 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersSecurity-Holders  1923 
Item 5.
 Other Information  2023 
Item 6.
 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K  2023 
SIGNATURES  2124
Certifications required under Sarbanes-Oxley Act25 

1


PART I.     FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.     Financial Statements

INTEVAC, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
            
September 29,December 31,
20012000


(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:        
 Cash and cash equivalents $23,236  $4,616 
 Short-term investments     33,787 
 Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $96 and $114 at September 29, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively  5,441   9,593 
 Inventories  31,891   15,833 
 Prepaid expenses and other current assets  804   844 
 Deferred tax asset  681   1,307 
   
   
 
  Total current assets  62,053   65,980 
Property, plant, and equipment, net  10,146   11,060 
Investment in 601 California Avenue LLC  2,431   2,431 
Goodwill and other intangibles     7 
Debt issuance costs  590   774 
Deferred tax assets and other assets  3,010   3,684 
   
   
 
   Total assets $78,230  $83,936 
   
   
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:        
 Notes payable $  $1,904 
 Accounts payable  4,889   2,757 
 Accrued payroll and related liabilities  2,062   1,534 
 Other accrued liabilities  2,792   2,375 
 Customer advances  22,700   16,317 
   
   
 
  Total current liabilities  32,443   24,887 
Convertible notes  41,245   41,245 
 
Shareholders’ equity:        
 Common stock, no par value  19,093   18,675 
 Accumulated deficit  (14,551)  (871)
   
   
 
  Total shareholders’ equity  4,542   17,804 
   
   
 
   Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $78,230  $83,936 
   
   
 
            
September 28,December 31,
20022001


(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:        
 Cash and cash equivalents $14,295  $18,157 
 Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $112 and $225 at September 28, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively  7,174   8,046 
 Inventories  22,353   21,691 
 Prepaid expenses and other current assets  697   478 
   
   
 
  Total current assets  44,519   48,372 
Property, plant and equipment, net  7,074   8,864 
Investment in 601 California Avenue LLC  2,431   2,431 
Debt issuance costs and other long-term assets  607   498 
   
   
 
   Total assets $54,631  $60,165 
   
   
 
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:        
 Accounts payable $2,323  $2,628 
 Accrued payroll and related liabilities  1,878   1,573 
 Other accrued liabilities  3,762   3,547 
 Customer advances  19,281   13,464 
   
   
 
  Total current liabilities  27,244   21,212 
Convertible notes  30,818   37,545 
Shareholders’ equity (deficit):        
 Common stock, no par value  19,370   19,093 
 Accumulated other comprehensive income  138   122 
 Accumulated deficit  (22,939)  (17,807)
   
   
 
  Total shareholders’ equity (deficit)  (3,431)  1,408 
   
   
 
   Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity (deficit) $54,631  $60,165 
   
   
 

See accompanying notes.

2


INTEVAC, INC.

 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOMELOSS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
                                 
Three Months EndedNine Months EndedThree Months EndedNine Months Ended




Sept 29,Sept 30,Sept 29,Sept 30,Sept. 28,Sept. 29,Sept. 28,Sept. 29,
20012000200120002002200120022001








Net revenues $8,414 $11,036 $27,909 $26,119 
Cost of net revenues 6,732 10,432 23,008 23,056 
Net revenues:Net revenues: 
Systems and components $4,948 $6,597 $16,790 $21,266 
Technology development 1,789 1,817 5,002 6,643 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total net revenues 6,737 8,414 21,792 27,909 
Cost of net revenues:Cost of net revenues: 
Systems and components 3,994 4,856 12,630 12,669 
Technology development 1,419 1,586 4,176 7,139 
Inventory provisions (18) 290 678 3,200 
 
 
 
 
 
 Total cost of net revenues 5,395 6,732 17,484 23,008 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
Gross profitGross profit 1,682 604 4,901 3,063 Gross profit 1,342 1,682 4,308 4,901 
Operating expenses:Operating expenses: Operating expenses: 
Research and development 3,845 2,726 10,950 7,703 
Selling, general and administrative 1,641 1,387 5,097 2,970 Research and development 2,285 3,845 8,391 10,950 
Restructuring  (23)  (638)Selling, general and administrative 1,976 1,641 5,522 5,097 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 Total operating expenses 5,486 4,090 16,047 10,035  Total operating expenses 4,261 5,486 13,913 16,047 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
Operating lossOperating loss (3,804) (3,486) (11,146) (6,972)Operating loss (2,919) (3,804) (9,605) (11,146)
Interest expenseInterest expense (723) (758) (2,193) (2,275)Interest expense (1,117) (723) (2,445) (2,193)
Interest income and other, netInterest income and other, net 471 835 959 2,276 Interest income and other, net 194 485 549 1,000 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
Loss before income taxesLoss before income taxes (4,056) (3,409) (12,380) (6,971)Loss before income taxes (3,842) (4,042) (11,501) (12,339)
Provision for income taxes 1,300  1,300  
Provision for (benefit from) income taxesProvision for (benefit from) income taxes  1,300 (6,369) 1,300 
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
Net lossNet loss $(5,356) $(3,409) $(13,680) $(6,971)Net loss $(3,842) $(5,342) $(5,132) $(13,639)
 
 
 
 
 
Other comprehensive income (loss):Other comprehensive income (loss): 
Unrealized foreign currency translation adjustment (4) (14) 16 (41)
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
Total comprehensive lossTotal comprehensive loss $(5,356) $(3,409) $(13,680) $(6,971)Total comprehensive loss $(3,846) $(5,356) $(5,116) $(13,680)
 
 
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
Basic earnings (loss) per share:Basic earnings (loss) per share: Basic earnings (loss) per share: 
Net loss $(0.45) $(0.29) $(1.15) $(0.59)Net loss $(0.32) $(0.45) $(0.42) $(1.15)
Shares used in per share amounts 11,983 11,822 11,939 11,789 Shares used in per share amounts 12,093 11,983 12,065 11,939 
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:Diluted earnings (loss) per share: Diluted earnings (loss) per share: 
Net loss $(0.45) $(0.29) $(1.15) $(0.59)Net loss $(0.32) $(0.45) $(0.42) $(1.15)
Shares used in per share amounts 11,983 11,822 11,939 11,789 Shares used in per share amounts 12,093 11,983 12,065 11,939 

See accompanying notes.

3


INTEVAC, INC.

 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
                  
Nine Months EndedNine Months Ended


Sept 29,Sept 30,Sept. 28,Sept. 29,
2001200020022001




Operating activities
Operating activities
 
Operating activities
 
Net lossNet loss $(13,680) $(6,971)Net loss $(5,132) $(13,639)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities: 
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating activities:Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating activities: 
Depreciation and amortization 3,195 3,660 Depreciation and amortization 2,849 3,195 
Deferred income taxes 1,300  Inventory provisions 678 3,200 
Foreign currency loss (35) 1 Deferred income taxes  1,300 
Loss on IMAT investment  125 Compensation expense in the form of common stock 4  
Restructuring charge — non-cash portion  856 Foreign currency loss 1 (35)
Loss on disposal of investment 803  Loss on disposal of investment  803 
Changes in assets and liabilities (2,791) 1,380 Changes operating in assets and liabilities 6,055 (5,991)
 
 
   
 
 
Total adjustmentsTotal adjustments 2,472 6,022 Total adjustments 9,587 2,472 
 
 
   
 
 
Net cash and cash equivalents used in operating activities (11,208) (949)
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating activitiesNet cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) operating activities 4,455 (11,167)
 
 
   
 
 
Investing activities
Investing activities
 
Investing activities
 
Purchase of investmentsPurchase of investments (5,463) (86,963)Purchase of investments  (5,463)
Proceeds from sale of investmentsProceeds from sale of investments 38,447 94,812 Proceeds from sale of investments  38,447 
Purchase of leasehold improvements and equipmentPurchase of leasehold improvements and equipment (3,574) (1,842)Purchase of leasehold improvements and equipment (1,123) (3,574)
 
 
   
 
 
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by investing activities 29,410 6,007 
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) investing activitiesNet cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) investing activities (1,123) 29,410 
 
 
   
 
 
Financing activities
Financing activities
 
Financing activities
 
Proceeds from issuance of common stockProceeds from issuance of common stock 418 474 Proceeds from issuance of common stock 273 418 
Exchange of Intevac convertible notes due 2004Exchange of Intevac convertible notes due 2004 (7,483)  
 
 
   
 
 
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by financing activities 418 474 
Net cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) financing activitiesNet cash and cash equivalents provided by (used in) financing activities (7,210) 418 
 
 
   
 
 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 18,620 5,532 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cashEffect of exchange rate changes on cash 16 (41)
 
 
 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalentsNet increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (3,862) 18,620 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of periodCash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 4,616 3,295 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 18,157 4,616 
 
 
   
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of periodCash and cash equivalents at end of period $23,236 $8,827 Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $14,295 $23,236 
 
 
   
 
 
Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information
Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information
 
Supplemental Schedule of Cash Flow Information
 
Cash paid (received) for:Cash paid (received) for: Cash paid (received) for: 
Interest $2,715 $2,762 Interest $2,381 $2,715 
Income tax refund  (5,803)Income tax refund (6,369)  
Other non-cash changes:Other non-cash changes: Other non-cash changes: 
Inventories transferred from property, plant and equipment $1,519 $639 Inventories transferred from property, plant and equipment $ $1,519 

See accompanying notes.

4


INTEVAC, INC.

 
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
 
1.Business Activities and Basis of Presentation

     Intevac, Inc.’s (“Intevac” or the “Company”) primary business isbusinesses are the design, manufacture and sale of complex capital equipment that is used to manufacture products such as flat panel displays and thin-film disks for computer disk drivesand the design, manufacture and sale of commercial products based on technology developed by the Photonics Technology Division (the “Equipment Business”“Products Group”). The Company also develops and the development of highly sensitive electro-optical devices and systems for the US military and its allies (the “Photonics Business”Technology Division”).

     TheSystems sold by the Products Group’s (formerly the Equipment Business manufactures thin-film depositionDivision) Memory and rapid thermal processing equipment that isFlat Panel Display Divisions are typically used into deposit highly engineered thin-films of material on a substrate, or to modify the manufacturecharacteristics and properties of flat panelthin-films already deposited on a substrate. These systems generally utilize proprietary manufacturing techniques and processes, operate under high levels of vacuum, are designed for high-volume continuous operation and use precision robotics, computerized controls and complex software programs to fully automate and control the production process. Products manufactured with these systems include cell phone color displays, automotive displays, computer monitors and thin-film deposition and lubrication equipment that is used in the manufacture of thin-film disks for computer hard disk drives. Spare partsThe Products Group’s Intensified Imaging Division was formed during the second quarter of 2002 to design, manufacture and after-sale service are also sold to purchasers ofsell commercial products based on extreme low-light-level camera technology developed by the Company’s equipment, and sales of components are made to other manufacturers of vacuum equipment.Photonics Technology Division.

     The Photonics Business has developed technologyTechnology Division is developing electro-optical devices and systems that permitspermit highly sensitive detection of photons in the visible and short wave infrared portions of the spectrum. This technology when combined with advanced silicon integrated circuits makes it possible to produce highly sensitive video cameras. This development work is aimed at creating new products for both military and industrial applications. Products include Intensified Digital Video Sensors, cameras incorporating those sensors and Laser Illuminated Viewing and Ranging (“LIVAR®”) systems for positive target identification.identification at long range and low-cost extreme low-light-level cameras for use in security and military applications.

     The financial information at September 29, 200128, 2002 and for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 29, 200128, 2002 and September 30, 200029, 2001 is unaudited, but includes all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) that the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of the financial information set forth herein, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, it does not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statements. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes thereto included or incorporated by reference in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000.2001.

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results inevitably will differ from those estimates, and such differences may be material to the financial statement. Certain prior year balances have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation.statements.

     The Company evaluates the collectibility of trade receivables on an ongoing basis and provides reserves against potential losses when appropriate.

     The results for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 29, 200128, 2002 are not considered indicative of the results to be expected for any future period or for the entire year.

5


INTEVAC, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 
2.Inventories

     TheInventories of systems and components are stated at the lower of inventorystandard cost or market. Inventories consist of the following:

                
September 29,December 31,September 28,December 31,
2001200020022001




(In thousands)(In thousands)
Raw materials $4,823 $4,591  $4,697 $5,659 
Work-in-progress 14,031 8,209  4,998 11,962 
Finished goods 13,037 3,033  12,658 4,070 
 
 
  
 
 
 $31,891 $15,833  $22,353 $21,691 
 
 
  
 
 

     A significant portionFinished goods inventory consists solely of the finished goods is represented by inventorycompleted systems at both Intevac’s factory and customer sites that are undergoing installation and acceptance testing.

Inventory reserves included in the above numbers were $9.1 million and $13.0 million at September 28, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively. Each quarter, we analyze our inventory (raw materials, WIP and finished goods) against the forecast demand for the next 12 months. Parts with no forecast requirements in that period are considered excess and inventory provisions are established to write those parts down to zero net book value. During this process, some inventory is identified as having no future use or value to us and is disposed of against the reserves. During the nine months ended September 28, 2002, $5.3 million of inventory was disposed of and charged to the reserve. Most of the discarded inventory related to two MDP 250K Disk Sputtering systems which had been written down to estimated salvage value in 2000.

 
3.Net Income (Loss) Per Share

     The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share:

                   
Three Months EndedNine Months Ended


Sept 29,Sept 30,Sept 29,Sept 30,
2001200020012000




(In thousands)
Numerator:                
 Loss from continuing operations $(5,356) $(3,409) $(13,680) $(6,971)
   
   
   
   
 
 Net loss $(5,356) $(3,409) $(13,680) $(6,971)
   
   
   
   
 
 Numerator for basic earnings per share — loss available to common stockholders  (5,356)  (3,409)  (13,680)  (6,971)
 Effect of dilutive securities:                
  6 1/2% convertible notes(1)            
   
   
   
   
 
 Numerator for diluted earnings per share — loss available to common stockholders after assumed conversions $(5,356) $(3,409) $(13,680) $(6,971)
   
   
   
   
 
Denominator:                
 Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted-average shares  11,983   11,822   11,939   11,789 
 Effect of dilutive securities:                
  Employee stock options(2)            
  6 1/2% convertible notes(1)            
   
   
   
   
 
 Dilutive potential common shares            
   
   
   
   
 
 Denominator for diluted earnings per share — adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions  11,983   11,822   11,939   11,789 
   
   
   
   
 
                   
Three-Months EndedNine Months Ended


Sept. 28,Sept. 29,Sept. 28,Sept. 29,
2002200120022001




(In thousands)
Numerator:                
 Loss from continuing operations $(3,842) $(5,342) $(5,132) $(13,639)
   
   
   
   
 
 Net loss $(3,842) $(5,342) $(5,132) $(13,639)
   
   
   
   
 
 Numerator for basic earnings per share — loss available to common stockholders  (3,842)  (5,342)  (5,132)  (13,639)
 Effect of dilutive securities:                
  6 1/2% convertible notes(1)            
   
   
   
   
 
 Numerator for diluted earnings per share — loss available to common stockholders after assumed conversions $(3,842) $(5,342) $(5,132) $(13,639)
   
   
   
   
 

6


INTEVAC, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

                   
Three-Months EndedNine Months Ended


Sept. 28,Sept. 29,Sept. 28,Sept. 29,
2002200120022001




(In thousands)
Denominator:                
 Denominator for basic earnings per share —
weighted-average shares
  12,093   11,983   12,065   11,939 
 Effect of dilutive securities:                
  Employee stock options(2)            
  6 1/2% convertible notes(1)            
   
   
   
   
 
 Dilutive potential common shares            
   
   
   
   
 
 Denominator for diluted earnings per share — adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions  12,093   11,983   12,065   11,939 
   
   
   
   
 


(1) Diluted EPS for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 29, 200128, 2002 and September 30, 200029, 2001 excludes “as converted” treatment of the Convertible Notes as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The number of “as converted” shares excluded for both the three-three-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001 was 4,282,247 and 1,999,758, respectively, and the number of “as converted” shares excluded for the nine-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001 was 2,640,992 and September 30, 2000 was 1,999,758.1,999,758, respectively.

6


INTEVAC, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

(2) Diluted EPS for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 29, 200128, 2002 and September 30, 200029, 2001 excludes the effect of shares issuable pursuant to employee stock options as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The number of employee stock option shares excluded for the three-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001 was 128,391 and September 30, 2000 was 50,274, and 189,107, respectively, and the number of employee stock option shares excluded for the nine-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001 was 130,222 and September 30, 2000 was 141,095, and 151,629, respectively.

 
4.Segment Reporting
 
Segment Description

     Intevac, Inc. has two reportable segments: Equipmentthe Products Group and Photonics.the Photonics Technology Division. The Company’s Equipment businessProducts Group sells complex capital equipment primarily used in the manufacturing of thin-film disks and flat panel displays and thin-film disks.commercial products based on technology developed by the Photonics Technology Division. The Company’s Photonics businessTechnology Division is developing military products utilizing electron sources that permit highly sensitive detection of photons in the visible and short-wave infrared spectrum.

     Included in corporate activities are general corporate expenses amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets and the reversal of a portion of a restructuring reserve established in September 1999, less an allocation of corporate expenses to operating units equal to 1% of net revenues.

Business Segment Net Revenues
                  
Three Months EndedNine Months Ended


Sept 29,Sept 30,Sept 29,Sept 30,
2001200020012000




(In thousands)
Equipment $6,547  $8,942  $20,662  $20,915 
Photonics  1,867   2,094   7,247   5,204 
   
   
   
   
 
 Total $8,414  $11,036  $27,909  $26,119 
   
   
   
   
 
Business Segment Profit & Loss
                 
Three Months EndedNine Months Ended


Sept 29,Sept 30,Sept 29,Sept 30,
2001200020012000




(In thousands)
Equipment $(2,402) $(2,530) $(7,656) $(4,009)
Photonics  (976)  (458)  (2,038)  (1,665)
Corporate activities  (426)  (498)  (1,452)  (1,298)
   
   
   
   
 
Operating income (loss)  (3,804)  (3,486)  (11,146)  (6,972)
Interest expense  (723)  (758)  (2,193)  (2,275)
Interest income  209   619   1,121   1,704 
Other income and expense, net  262   216   (162)  572 
   
   
   
   
 
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes $(4,056) $(3,409) $(12,380) $(6,971)
   
   
   
   
 
5.Restructuring

     During the third quarter of 1999, the Company adopted an expense reduction plan that included closing one of the buildings at its Santa Clara facility and a reduction in force of 7 employees of the Company’s staff

7


INTEVAC, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

of contract and regular personnel. The reductions took place at the Company’s facilities in Santa Clara, California. The Company incurred a charge of $2,225,000 related to the expense reduction plan.

     During the first quarter of 2000, the Company vacated the building and negotiated a lease termination for that space with its landlord, which released the Company from the obligation to pay any rent after April 30, 2000. As a result, the Company reversed $615,000 of the restructuring reserve during the first quarter of 2000.

     During the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company adopted a plan to discontinue operations at its RPC Technologies, Inc. electron beam processing equipment subsidiary and to close the RPC facility in Hayward, California. Twenty-six employees of the Company’s staff of contract and regular personnel were terminated as a result. The Company incurred a charge of $1,639,000 related to this plan.

     In the first quarter of 2000, Intevac sold certain assets of its RPC Technologies, Inc. subsidiary to Quemex Technology. Proceeds from the sale included a cash payment, assumption of the Hayward facility lease and the assumption of certain other liabilities. Excluded from the sale were two previously leased systems and three completed systems remaining in inventory. The Company was able to reverse the portions of the restructuring reserve established to provide for future rents due on the facility and for the closure of the facility. However, since Intevac retained ownership of the two leased systems, the Company established an equivalent reserve to provide for any residual obligations at the end of the leases. Of the three systems in inventory, two were included in 2000 revenues and one is included in 2001 revenues. One of the two leased systems was sold to the lessee in the three months ending September 29, 2001.

The following table displays the activity in the building closure restructuring reserve, established in the third quarter of 1999, and in the RPC operation discontinuance restructuring reserve, established in the fourth quarter of 1999, through December 31, 2000.

Business Segment Net Revenues
          
RPC
BuildingOperation
ClosureDiscontinuance
RestructuringRestructuring


(In thousands)
Original restructuring charge $2,225  $1,639 
 Actual expense incurred  (511)  (851)
 Reversal of restructuring charge  (97)   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 1999  1,617   788 
 Actual expense incurred  (815)  (365)
 Valuation reserve — leased systems     (361)
 Reversal of restructuring charge  (615)   
   
   
 
Balance at April 1, 2000  187   62 
 Actual expense incurred  (162)  (61)
   
   
 
Balance at July 1, 2000  25   1 
 Actual expense incurred  (2)  (1)
 Reversal of restructuring charge  (23)   
   
   
 
Balance at December 31, 2000 $  $ 
   
   
 
                  
Three Months EndedNine Months Ended


Sept. 28,Sept. 29,Sept. 28,Sept. 29,
2002200120022001




(In thousands)
Products Group $4,767  $6,547  $16,313  $20,662 
Photonics Technology Division  1,970   1,867   5,479   7,247 
   
   
   
   
 
 Total $6,737  $8,414  $21,792  $27,909 
   
   
   
   
 
Business Segment Profit & Loss and Reconciliation to Consolidated Pre-tax Profit (Loss)
                  
Three Months EndedNine Months Ended


Sept. 28,Sept. 29,Sept. 28,Sept. 29,
2002200120022001




(In thousands)
Products Group $(2,218) $(2,402) $(6,920) $(7,656)
Photonics Technology Division  (167)  (976)  (1,071)  (2,038)
Corporate activities  (534)  (426)  (1,614)  (1,452)
   
   
   
   
 
Operating loss  (2,919)  (3,804)  (9,605)  (11,146)
Interest expense  (1,117)  (723)  (2,445)  (2,193)
Interest income  59   209   199   1,121 
Other income and expense, net  135   276   350   (121)
   
   
   
   
 
 Loss from continuing operations before income taxes $(3,842) $(4,042) $(11,501) $(12,339)
   
   
   
   
 
Geographic Area Net Trade Revenues
                  
Three Months EndedNine Months Ended


Sept. 28,Sept. 29,Sept. 28,Sept. 29,
2002200120022001




(In thousands)
United States $2,619  $2,888  $9,386  $11,976 
Far East  4,117   4,759   12,105   14,966 
Europe  1   767   300   827 
Rest of World        1   140 
   
   
   
   
 
 Total $6,737  $8,414  $21,792  $27,909 
   
   
   
   
 
 
6.5.Income Taxes

     The Company accrued a tax benefit of $6.4 million for the nine-month period ended September 28, 2002. This resulted from federal tax law changes made in early 2002 that allow losses incurred in 2001 and 2002 to be carried back 5 years. The Company paid federal income taxes of approximately $5.2 million for 1996, $0.9 million for 1997 and $0.5 million for 1998. The Company received the $6.4 million refund early in the third quarter of 2002. The Company’s federal tax returns, and any refunds resulting from them, are subject to audit for 3 years from the date filed.

     For the three- and nine-month periods ended September 29, 2001, and September 30, 2000, the Company did not accrue a tax benefit due to the inability at that time to realize additional refunds from loss carry-backs. Based on management’s review, the Company increased its deferred tax asset valuation reserve by $1.3 million during

8


INTEVAC, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

management’s review, the Company increased its deferred tax asset valuation reserve by $1.3 million during the three-month period ended September 29, 2001. As of September 29, 2001 the

The Company’s $14.5 million deferred tax asset is fully offset by a $14.5 million valuation allowance, resulting in a net deferred tax assets totaled $3.7 million. If in the futureasset of zero at September 28, 2002.

6.Convertible Note Exchange

     On July 12, 2002 the Company cannot project with reasonable certainty that it will earn taxable income sufficient to realize all or partcompleted the exchange of $36,270,000 in aggregate principal amount of its 6 1/2% convertible notes due 2004 for $29,543,000 of its new 6 1/2% convertible subordinated notes due 2009 and $7,585,000 in cash, including $858,000 for accrued interest. The new 6 1/2% convertible subordinated notes due 2009 are convertible, at the holders’ option, into Intevac common shares at a conversion price of $7.00 per share. $1,275,000 in aggregate principal amount of the value6 1/2% convertible subordinated notes due 2004 remain outstanding after the closing of these net deferred tax assets,the exchange offer.

In accounting for the exchange of the convertible notes, the Company wrote off $368,000 of debt issuance costs related to the Convertible Notes due 2004, reflecting the portion of such costs attributable to the convertible notes exchanged. The remaining debt issuance costs will be amortized to interest expense over the valueremaining life of the net deferred tax assets not likelyConvertible Notes due 2004. In connection with the exchange offer, the Company incurred $756,000 of offering costs. Of this amount, $140,000 represented the cash portion of the exchange offer and was expensed during the 3 months ended September 28, 2002. The $616,000 balance of the exchange offering costs will be amortized to be realized.interest expense over the term of the new notes. There was no gain or loss associated with this transaction as $36,270,000 of Convertible Notes due 2004 were exchanged for $36,270,000 of cash and new securities.

 
7.Capital Transactions

     During the nine-month period ending September 29, 2001,2002, Intevac sold stock to its employees under the Company’s Stock Option and Employee Stock Purchase Plans. A total of 160,053108,020 shares were issued for which the Company received $418,000.$273,000.

8.Subsequent Events

     On October 21, 2002 the Company made a payment of $82,000 to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory to settle an expired royalty agreement. Of the total payment, $73,000 related to product on which revenue has already been recognized as of September 28, 2002, which was recorded in cost of net revenues resulting in a decrease to earnings per share of $0.01 for the three months ending September 28, 2002. The remainder of the payment was recorded as a prepaid expense. The financial statements included in this Form 10-Q are updated from the statements that Intevac issued in a press release on October 22, 2002.

On November 1, 2002 the Company completed the sale of its rapid thermal processing equipment business to Photon Dynamics, Inc. of San Jose, CA. Photon Dynamics paid $20.0 million cash and assumed certain liabilities. $2.0 million of the cash payment will be held in escrow for one year and is subject to a number of conditions. Photon Dynamics hired 23 of Intevac’s employees as a result of the transaction and will relocate them to Photon Dynamics’ San Jose facility.

9.Financial Presentation

     Certain prior year amounts in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to 2002 presentation.

9


Item 2.     Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as “believes”, “expects”, “anticipates” and the like indicate forward-looking statements. The Company’s actual results may differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, the risk factors set forth elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q under “Certain Factors Which May Affect Future Operating Results” and in other documents the Company files from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed in March 2001,2002, Form 10-Q’s and Form 8-K’s.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“US GAAP”). We review the accounting policies we use in reporting our financial results on a regular basis. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable, inventories, income taxes, warranty obligations, long-lived assets, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. Results may differ from these estimates due to actual outcomes being different from those on which we based our assumptions. These estimates and judgments are reviewed by management on an ongoing basis. The Audit Committee and our auditors review significant estimates and judgements prior to the public release of our financial results.

     Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates made in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition —We recognize revenue using the guidance from SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 “Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements.” Our revenue recognition policy requires that there is persuasive evidence of a sales contract, that the price is fixed, that product title has transferred, that product payment is not contingent on any factors and is reasonably assured, and that we have completed all the material tasks and deliverables required by the contract.

     Revenues for systems are recognized upon customer acceptance. For large deposition and rapid thermal processing systems shipped through a distributor, revenue is typically recognized after the distributor has accepted the system at our factory and the system has been shipped. For large deposition and RTP systems sold direct to end customers, revenue is recognized after installation and acceptance of the system at the customer site.

     There is a written acceptance and test procedure (“ATP”) for each system, which is specified in the customer purchase order. The ATP includes a detailed set of criteria that are required as a condition of customer acceptance. The ATP is typically conducted over one or more days during which the system is subjected to a number of tests to validate that the system is performing in a repeatable fashion, reliably and to specification. If material issues or problems are discovered during the ATP process, then they are corrected prior to customer acceptance.

     In the case of a direct end user sale, there are typically two ATP’s performed. The first ATP is performed at Intevac’s factory with the customer in attendance and must be approved by the customer prior to shipment of the system. The second ATP is performed after the system has been installed at the customer’s factory, again with the customer in attendance. Once the second ATP is approved by the customer, and the customer

10


has accepted the system in writing and agreed to make any remaining payments due on the system, then the system is recognized as a sale and revenue for the entire system is recorded.

     In the case of a shipment through a distributor, an ATP is performed at Intevac’s factory with the distributor in attendance. Upon completion of the ATP, and after the distributor has accepted the system in writing and agreed to make any remaining payments due on the system, then the system is recognized as a sale and revenue for the entire system is recorded. The distributor then completes customer factory installation and ATP at its cost. When we believe that there may be higher than normal end-user installation and acceptance issues for systems shipped through a distributor, such as when a major new version of a product is delivered for the first time, then the acceptance and revenue recognition process follows the model described above for a direct end user sale. The primary difference in this case is that revenue recognition is dependent on the Company obtaining acceptance of the product by both its customer (the distributor) and its distributor’s customer (the end user).

     During the period that a system is undergoing customer acceptance (either distributor or end user), the value of the system remains in inventory and any payments received, or amounts invoiced, related to the system are included in customer advances. When revenue is recognized on the system, the inventory is charged to cost of net revenues, the customer advance is liquidated and the customer is billed for the unpaid balance of the system revenue.

     As of September 28, 2002 the Company reported $12.7 million of finished goods (see Note 2) which consisted of five capacity upgrades to FPD deposition systems undergoing final acceptance testing at the end user’s facility, a FPD silicon deposition system undergoing final acceptance testing at the end user’s facility, a rapid thermal processing system undergoing final acceptance testing at our customer’s factory, and a disk manufacturing system that was purchased in place by Company’s customer during the third quarter of 2002. The disk manufacturing system has not yet been delivered as the customer is still preparing their facility to accept the system. Taken as a whole, the above systems represent $16.0 million of the Company’s $30.3 million order backlog, and $14.5 million of the Company’s $19.3 million of customer advances (see Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets).

     Revenues for technology upgrades, spare parts, consumables and prototype products built by the Photonics Technology Division are generally recognized upon shipment. Service and maintenance contract revenue, which to date has been insignificant, is recognized ratably over applicable contract periods or as the service is performed.

     We perform best efforts research and development work under various government-sponsored research contracts. Typically, for each contract, we commit to perform certain research and development efforts up to an agreed upon amount. In connection with these contracts, we receive funding on an incremental basis up to a ceiling. Some of these contracts are cost sharing in nature, where Intevac is reimbursed for a portion of the total costs expended. Revenue on these contracts is recognized in accordance with contract terms, typically as costs are incurred. In addition, we have, from time to time, negotiated with a third party to fund a portion of our costs in return for a joint interest to our rights at the end of the contract. In the event that a particular contract over-runs its agreed upon amount, we may be liable for the additional costs.

     These contracts are accounted for under ARB No. 43, Chapter 11, Section A, which addresses Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee Contracts. The contracts are all cost-type, with financial terms that are a mixture of fixed fee, incentive fee, no fee and cost-sharing. The deliverables under each contract range from reports to prototype hardware. In none of the contracts is there an obligation for either party to continue the program once the funds have been expended. The efforts can be terminated at any time for convenience, in which case we would be reimbursed for our actual incurred costs, plus fee if applicable, for the completed effort. We own the entire right, title and interest to each invention discovered under the contract, unless we specifically give up that right. The US Government has a paid-up license to use any invention/intellectual property for government purposes only.

     Our shipping terms are customarily FOB shipping point. For systems sold directly to the end user, our obligations remaining after shipment include installation, end user factory acceptance and warranty. For

11


systems sold to distributors, typically the distributor assumes responsibility for installation and end user customer acceptance. In some cases, the distributor will assume some or all of the warranty liability. For products other than systems, warranty is the only obligation we have after shipment.

Inventories —We make provisions for potentially excess and obsolete inventory based on backlog and forecasted demand. However, order backlog is subject to revisions, cancellations, and rescheduling. Actual demand will inevitably differ from forecasted demand due to a number of factors. For example, the thin-film disk industry has suffered from over-capacity and poor financial results, which has led to industry consolidation. Consolidation can lead to the availability of used equipment that competes at very low prices with our products. Financial stress and consolidation in the Company’s customer base can also lead to the cancellation of orders for products after we have incurred substantial costs related to those orders. Such problems have resulted, and may continue to result, in excess and obsolete inventory, and the provision of related reserves.

Warranty —The Company’s standard warranty is twelve months from customer acceptance. During this warranty period any necessary non-consumable parts are supplied and installed. A provision for the estimated warranty cost is recorded at the time revenue is recognized.

Results of Operations

 
Three Months Ended September 29, 200128, 2002 and September 30, 200029, 2001

     Net revenues.Net revenues consist primarily of sales of equipment used to manufacture flat panel displays, andequipment used to manufacture thin-film disks, for computer hard disk drives, related equipment and system components electron beam processing equipment (“Equipment”) and contract research and development related to the development of highly sensitive electro-optical devices under government sponsored R&D contracts and sales of derivative products (“Photonics”). Net revenues from system sales are recognized upon customer acceptance. Net revenues from sales of related equipment and system components are recognized upon product shipment. Contract research and development revenue is recognized in accordance with contract terms, typically as costs are incurred.systems. Net revenues decreased by 24%20% to $6.7 million for the three-month period ended September 28, 2002 from $8.4 million for the three-month period ended September 29, 20012001. Net revenues from $11.0the Products Group declined to $4.8 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2000. Net revenues28, 2002 from Equipment declined to $6.5 million for the three-month period ended September 29, 2001. The decrease in Products Group sales was due primarily to lower sales of disk manufacturing equipment during the third quarter of 2002, and, to a lesser extent, the sale of an electron beam processing system during the third quarter of 2001, partially offset by an increase in sales of flat panel manufacturing equipment in the 2002 quarter. Net revenues for the three-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001 include $2.5 million and $1.8 million, respectively, of sales of Rapid Thermal Processing equipment, a product line which the Company sold in November 2002. During the third quarter of 2002, Intevac drastically reduced the size of its fabrication center and stopped accepting orders for outside business. The fabrication center contributed sales of $0.3 million in both the three-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001. Net revenues from $8.9the Photonics Technology Division increased to $2.0 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2000. The decrease in Equipment sales was primarily the result of a decrease in domestic sales of disk manufacturing equipment, which was partially offset by an increase in international sales of flat panel manufacturing equipment and electron beam processing manufacturing equipment. Net revenues28, 2002 from Photonics decreased to $1.9 million for the three-month period ended September 29, 2001 from $2.12001.

     International sales decreased by 25% to $4.1 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2000.

     International sales increased by 122% to28, 2002 from $5.5 million for the three-month period ended September 29, 2001 from $2.5 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2000.2001. The increasedecrease in international sales was primarily due to an increasea decrease in net revenues from flat panel displaydisk manufacturing and electron beam processing manufacturing equipment. International sales constituted 61% of net revenues for the three-month period ended September 28, 2002 and 66% of net revenues for the three-month period ended September 29, 2001 and 23% of net revenues for the three-month period ended September 30, 2000.2001.

     Backlog.The Company’s backlog of orders for its products was $30.3 million at September 28, 2002 and $42.1 million at September 29, 2001. The reduction was primarily due to a lower backlog of flat panel deposition systems, five of which were included in fourth quarter 2001 and $37.1 million at September 30, 2000.revenues. The Company includes in backlog the value of purchase orders for its products that have scheduled delivery dates.

     Gross margin.Cost of net revenues consists primarily of purchased materials, fabrication, assembly, test and installation labor and overhead, customer-specific engineering costs, warranty costs, royalties, provisions for inventory reserves, scrap and costs attributable to contract research and development. Gross margin increasedwas 20% for both the three-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001.

     Products Group gross margins decreased to 20% for the three-month period ended September 29, 200128, 2002 from 5%32% for the three-month period ended September 30, 2000 as29, 2001. The reduction in gross margin was due

12


primarily to lower shipments of higher margin technology upgrades, retrofit reserves established for systems in the resultfield and under-utilization of an increase in Equipmentthe factory.

     Photonics Technology Division gross margins increased to 32%23% in the three months ended September 28, 2002 from 9%, partially offset by a decrease in Photonics gross margins to (22%) from (4%).

     Equipment gross margins were depressed in the third quarter of 2000 as the result of the establishment of a $2.0 million inventory reserve related to the expected cost of updating and reconfiguring slow moving disk sputtering systems in inventory. Excluding the effect of this reserve, Equipment gross margins in the third quarter of 2000 were 32%.

three months ended September 29, 2001. Photonics gross margins were negativelyfavorably impacted asby an increase in the resultshipment of an increased proportionprototype products and by a reduction in the portion of Photonics revenue generated from cost-sharing research and development contracts. The Company expects that Photonics gross margins in the Photonics Technology Division will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on the relative mix of sales derived from prototype products, from fully funded research and development contracts and from cost-shared research and development contracts.

10


     Research and development.Research and development expense consists primarily of prototype materials, salaries and related costs of employees engaged in ongoing research, design and development activities for flat panel manufacturing equipment, disk manufacturing equipment and research by the Photonics Technology Division. Company funded research and development expense increaseddecreased to $2.3 million for the three-month period ended September 28, 2002 from $3.8 million for the three-month period ended September 29, 2001, from $2.7 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2000, representing 46%34% and 25%46%, respectively, of net revenue. This increaseThe decrease was primarily the result of higherlower spending for the development of flat panel and disk manufacturing equipment.equipment, partially offset by research and development spending in the Company’s commercial Intensified Imaging Division that was formed in the second quarter of 2002. The 2001 spending was driven by development of the MDP 200 system and a flat panel deposition system.

     Research and development expenses do not include costs of $1.6$1.4 million and $2.0$1.6 million, respectively, for the three-month periods ended September 29, 200128, 2002 and September 30, 200029, 2001 related to contract research and development performed by the Company’s Photonics business.Technology Division. These expenses are included in cost of net revenues.

     Research and development expense for the three-monththree-months period ended September 30, 200028, 2002 also does not include costs of $0.1 million of costs reimbursed under the terms of avarious research and development cost sharing agreement with a Japanese company. Since 1993 the Company has received $9.5 million under this cost sharing agreement. Research and development expense for the three-month period ended September 29, 2001 does not include $32,000 of costs reimbursed under the terms of a research and development cost sharing agreement with the National Institute of Standards and Technology related to development of super lattice sources for thin-film disk manufacturing.agreements.

     Selling, general and administrative.Selling, general and administrative expense consists primarily of selling, marketing, customer support, production of customer samples, financial, travel, management, legal and professional services and bad debt expense. Domestic sales and international sales of thin-film disk manufacturing products in Singapore, Malaysia and Taiwan are made by the Company’s direct sales force, whereas other international sales of thin-film disk manufacturing and other products are made by distributors and representatives that provide services such as sales, installation, warranty and customer support. The Company also has a subsidiary in Singapore to support customers in Southeast Asia. Through the second quarter of 2000, the Company marketed its flat panel manufacturing equipment to the Far East through its Japanese joint venture, IMAT. During the third quarter of 2000 the Company and its joint venture partner, Matsubo, transferred IMAT’s activities and employees to Matsubo, which became a distributor of the Company’s flat panel products, and shut down the operations of IMAT.

     Selling, general and administrative expense increased to $2.0 million for the three-month period ended September 28, 2002 from $1.6 million for the three-month period ended September 29, 2001, from $1.4 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2000, representing 20%29% and 13%20%, respectively, of net revenue. The primary reasonincrease was primarily the result of a representative commission due for the increase wassale of a flat panel manufacturing system and an increase in the selling, general and administrative salaries related topersonnel in the Equipment business.

Restructuring expense.Restructuring expense was ($23,000) during the three-month period ended September 30, 2000. During the third quarter of 2000, the Company completed a September 1999 restructuring plan and reversed the unused $23,000 balance of the related reserve.Products Group.

     Interest expense.Interest expense consists primarily of interest on the Company’s Convertible Notes, and, to a lesser extent, interest on approximately $1.9 million of short-term debt related to the purchase of Cathode Technology in 1996.Notes. Interest expense was $0.7$1.1 million and $0.8$0.7 million, respectively, in the three-month periods ended September 29, 200128, 2002 and September 30, 2000.29, 2001. Interest expense declinedincreased in 2002 due to the retirementwrite-off of $0.4 million of the $1.9debt issuance costs related to the Company’s convertible notes due in 2004 and the write-off of $0.1 million of short-term debt during the first quarter of 2001.offering costs related to the convertible note exchange.

     Interest income and other, net.Interest income and other, net consists primarily of interest incometotaled $0.2 million and dividends on$0.5 million for the Company’s investments, foreign currency hedging gainsthree months ended September 28, 2002 and losses, early payment discounts on the purchase of inventories, goods and services and, in 2000, the Company’s 49% share of the loss incurred by IMAT.September 29, 2001, respectively. Interest income and other, net declined to $0.5 million for the three-month period ended September 29,in 2002 consisted primarily of interest and dividend income on investments. Interest income and other, net in 2001 from $0.8 million for the three-month period ended September 30, 2000. The decline wasconsisted primarily the result of reduced interest and dividend income caused by lower cash balanceson investments and lower interest rates during 2001.foreign currency hedging gains.

13


     Provision for (benefit from) income taxes.For the three-month periods ended September 29, 2001 and September 30, 2000, the Company did not accrue a tax benefit due to the inability to realize additional refunds from loss carry-backs. Based on management’s review, the Company increased its deferred tax asset valuation

11


reserve by $1.3 million during the three-month period ended September 29, 2001. As of September 29, 2001 the Company’s net deferred tax assets totaled $3.7 million. If in the future the Company cannot project with reasonable certainty that it will earn taxable income sufficient to realize all or part of the value of these net deferred tax assets, the Company will expense the value of the net deferred tax assets not likely to be realized.
Nine Months Ended September 29, 2001 and September 30, 2000

Net revenues.Net revenues increased by 7% to $27.9 million for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 from $26.1 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000. Net revenues from Equipment sales declined slightly to $20.7 million for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 from $20.9 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000. Net revenues from Photonics increased to $7.2 million for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 from $5.2 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000. The increase in Photonics sales was primarily the result of increased contract research and development sales partially offset by reduced product sales.

     International sales increased by 147% to $15.9 million for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 from $6.4 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000. The increase in international sales was primarily due to an increase in sales of disk manufacturing equipment, and to a lesser extent an increase in the sales of rapid thermal processing systems for flat panel display manufacturing. International sales constituted 57% of net revenues for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 and 25% of net revenues for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000.

Gross margin.Gross margin was 18% for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 as compared to 12% for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000. Gross margin in the Equipment business increased to 26% for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 as compared to 19% for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000. Equipment gross margins in the nine-month periods ended September 29, 2001 and September 30, 2000, respectively, were negatively impacted by the establishment of $2.4 million and $3.1 million of inventory reserves related to systems inventory. Excluding the effect of these reserves, Equipment gross margins were 37% and 34%, respectively, in the nine-month periods ended September 29, 2001 and September 30, 2000.

     Photonics gross margins increased slightly to (5%) for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 from (10%) for the nine-month period ended September��30, 2000. Photonics gross margins in both years have been negatively impacted by a significant portion of revenue being derived from cost-sharing research and development contracts. The Company expects that Photonics gross margins will fluctuate based on the relative mix of sales derived from prototype products, from fully funded research and development contracts and from cost-shared research and development contracts.

Research and development.Company funded research and development expense increased by 42% to $11.0 million for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 from $7.7 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000, representing 39% and 29%, respectively, of net revenue. This increase was primarily the result of increased expense for the development of flat panel display manufacturing equipment and photonics products, partially offset by reduced spending for development of disk manufacturing equipment.

     Research and development expenses do not include costs of $7.1 million and $4.3 million, respectively, for the nine-month periods ended September 29, 2001 and September 30, 2000 related to contract research and development performed by the Company’s Photonics business. These expenses are included in cost of net revenues.

     Research and development expense for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000 does not include $0.6 million of costs reimbursed under the terms of a research and development cost sharing agreement with a Japanese company. Research and development expense for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 does not include $0.4 million of costs reimbursed under the terms of a research and development cost sharing agreement with the National Institute of Standards and Technology related to development of super lattice sources for thin-film disk manufacturing.

12


Selling, general and administrative.Selling, general and administrative expense increased by 72% to $5.1 million for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 from $3.0 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000, representing 18% and 11%, respectively, of net revenue. The primary reasons for the increase were a $1.5 million credit to bad debt expense during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000 and increased selling, general and administrative salaries in the Equipment business during the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001.

Restructuring expense (gain).Restructuring gain was ($0.6) million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2000 the Company vacated approximately 47,000 square feet of its Santa Clara Headquarters and negotiated an early lease termination for the space. As a result, the Company reversed approximately $0.6 million of previously accrued restructuring expense relating to future rents on the vacated space.

Interest expense.Interest expense declined to $2.2 million in the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 from $2.3 million in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000, due to the retirement of $1.9 million of short-term debt during the first quarter of 2001.

Interest income and other, net.Interest income and other, net decreased to $1.0 million for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 from $2.3 million for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2000. The decrease was primarily the result of a $0.8 million loss on the disposition of Pacific Gas and Electric commercial paper and lower interest income due to reduced interest rates and cash balances.

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes.For the nine-month periods ended September 29, 2001 and September 30, 2000,28, 2002, the Company did not accrue a tax benefit due to the inability to realize additional refunds from loss carry-backs. Based on management’s review, the Company increased its deferred tax asset valuation reserve by $1.3 million during the three-month period ended September 29, 2001. The Company’s $14.5 million deferred tax asset is fully offset by a $14.5 million valuation allowance, resulting in a net deferred tax asset of zero at September 29, 2002.

Nine Months Ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001

Net revenues.Net revenues decreased 22% to $21.8 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2002 from $27.9 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2001. Net revenues from the Products Group decreased to $16.3 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2002 from $20.7 million for nine months ended September 29, 2001. The decrease in net revenues from the Products Group was due primarily to lower revenues in 2002 from technology upgrades and spare parts and the sale of two electron beam manufacturing systems during the nine months ended September 29, 2001, partially offset by an increase in the sales of disk and flat panel manufacturing systems in 2002. Net revenues for the nine-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001 include $5.0 million and $3.3 million, respectively, of sales of Rapid Thermal Processing equipment, a product line which the Company sold in November 2002. Intevac’s fabrication center contributed sales of $0.6 million and $1.5 million in the nine month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001, respectively. Net revenues from the Photonics Technology Division decreased to $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2002 from $7.2 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2001. The decrease in Photonics net revenues was primarily the result of decreased contract R&D activities during 2002.

     International sales decreased 22% to $12.4 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2002 from $15.9 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2001. The decrease in international sales during the nine months ended September 28, 2002 was primarily due to a decrease in revenue from disk manufacturing and electron beam processing equipment. International sales constituted 57% of net revenues for both of the nine-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001.

Gross margin.Gross margin was 20% for the nine months ended September 28, 2002 as compared to 18% for the nine months ended September 29, 2001. Gross margin in the Products Group declined to 22% in the nine months ended September 28, 2002 from 26% in the nine months ended September 29, 2001. Products Group gross margin in the nine months ended September 28, 2002 was negatively impacted by the high initial costs to complete Intevac’s first MDP 200 system and by under-utilization of the factory. Products Group gross margin in the nine months ended September 29, 2001 was negatively impacted by the provision of a $2.4 million inventory reserve related to a custom multi-chip module system manufactured for a customer that ceased operations and by the sale of an electron beam processing system at a low gross margin.

     Photonics Technology Division gross margin increased to 14% for the nine months ended September 28, 2002 from (5%) for the nine months ended September 29, 2001 due primarily to a reduction in the portion of Photonics revenue generated from cost-sharing research and development contracts. The Company expects that gross margins in the Photonics Technology Division will fluctuate from quarter to quarter based on the relative mix of revenues derived from sales of prototype products, from fully funded research and development contracts and from cost shared research and development contracts.

Research and development.Company funded research and development expense decreased 23% to $8.4 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2002 from $11.0 million for the nine months ended September 29, 2001, representing 39% of net revenue in each period. The decrease was primarily the result of lower spending for the development of flat panel and disk manufacturing equipment, partially offset by accelerated depreciation of $0.5 million on a disk manufacturing system that was disposed of during the second quarter of 2002 and by research and development spending in the Company’s Intensified Imaging Division that was formed in the second quarter of 2002.

     Research and development expenses do not include costs of $4.2 million and $7.1 million, respectively, for the nine-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001 related to contract research

14


and development performed by the Company’s Photonics Technology Division. These expenses are included in cost of net revenues.

     Research and development expenses also do not include costs of $0.3 million and $0.4 million, respectively, in the nine-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001, reimbursed under the terms of various research and development cost sharing agreements.

Selling, general and administrative.Selling, general and administrative expense was $5.5 million and $5.1 million for the nine-month periods ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001, representing 25% and 18%, respectively, of net revenue. The increase was primarily due to commissions paid on the sale of flat panel manufacturing systems.

Interest expense.Interest expense increased to $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2002 from $2.2 million in the nine months ended September 29, 2001. The increase in interest expense was due to the write-off of $0.5 million of debt issuance and offering costs related to the successful exchange of the Company’s convertible notes due 2004.

Interest income and other, net.Interest income and other, net totaled $0.6 million and $1.0 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2002 and September 29, 2001, respectively. Interest income and other, net in 2002 consisted primarily of interest and dividend income on investments. Interest and other income, net in 2001 consisted of a $0.8 million loss on the disposition of Pacific Gas & Electric commercial paper, which was offset primarily by interest and dividend income on other investments.

Provision for (benefit from) income taxes.The Company accrued a tax benefit of $6.4 million for the nine-month period ended September 28, 2002. This resulted from federal tax law changes early in 2002 that increased the length of time over which losses incurred in 2001 and 2002 could be carried back from 2 years to 5 years. The Company paid federal income taxes of approximately $5.2 million for 1996, $0.9 million for 1997 and $0.5 million for 1998. For the nine months ended September 29, 2001, the Company did not accrue a tax benefit due to the inability at that time to realize additional refunds from loss carry-backs. Based on management’s review, the Company increased its deferred tax asset valuation reserve by $1.3 million during the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001. As of September 29, 2001 theThe Company’s $14.5 million deferred tax asset is fully offset by a $14.5 million valuation allowance, resulting in a net deferred tax assets totaled $3.7 million. If in the future the Company cannot project with reasonable certainty that it will earn taxable income sufficient to realize all or partasset of the value of these net deferred tax assets, the Company will expense the value of the net deferred tax assets not likely to be realized.zero at September 29, 2002.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     The Company’s operating activities usedprovided cash of $11.2$4.5 million for the nine-month periodnine months ended September 29, 2001.28, 2002. The cash usedprovided was due primarily to increases in inventorycustomer advances and to non-cash charges for depreciation and amortization, which were partially offset by the net loss incurred by the Company, which was partially offsetCompany. In the nine months ended September 29, 2001, the Company’s operating activities used cash of $11.2 million due primarily to inventory increases and the net loss incurred by an increase in customer advances, bythe Company. Lower billings during the three months ended September 28, 2002 led to a decreasereduction in accounts receivable at that date as compared to the balance at December 31, 2001. Inventories increased slightly overall from December 31, 2001 to September 28, 2002, however the mix of inventory was quite different. At September, 28, 2002 more than half of the Company’s inventory was represented by systems undergoing installation and by depreciation and amortization.acceptance testing at customer sites. Work-in-progress inventory was sharply lower as fewer new systems were in production at September 28, 2002 than were in production at December 31, 2001.

     The Company’s investing activities used cash of $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2002 as a result of the purchase of fixed assets. In the nine months ended September 29, 2001, the Company’s investing activities provided cash of $29.4 million for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 as a result of the net sale of investments, which was partially offset by the purchase of fixed assets. During the nine months ended September 29, 2001, the Company converted all of its short-term investments into cash or cash equivalents.

     The Company’s financing activities used cash of $7.2 million for the nine months ended September 28, 2002 as a result of the exchange of most of the Company’s convertible notes due 2004 for new convertible notes due 2009 and cash. Sale of the Company’s common stock to its employees through the Company’s

15


employee benefit plans provided cash of $0.3 million in the nine months September 28, 2002. The Company’s financing activities provided cash of $0.4 million for the nine-month period ended September 29, 2001 as the result of the sale of the Company’s common stock to its employees through the Company’s employee benefit plans.

     The Company believes that its available sources of funds and anticipated cash flows from operations will be adequate to finance current operations and anticipated capital expenditures through at least fiscal 2001.

Certain Factors Which May Affect Future Operating Results

     Our products are complex, constantly evolving, Revenue generated by our businesses during 2003 may not provide sufficient gross profit to cover operating

and are often designed and manufactured to individual customer requirements which require additional engineering.interest expenses.

     Intevac’s Equipment Division products have a large numberA significant increase in the sales of components and are highly complex. Intevac may experience delays and technical andthin-film disk manufacturing difficulties in future introductions equipment and/or volume productiondeposition equipment for the manufacture of new systems flat panel displays and/or enhancements. In addition, some ofphotonics based revenues will be necessary for the systems built by Intevac may be customizedCompany to meet individual customer requirements. Intevac has limited manufacturing capacity and engineering resources and may be unable to complete development, manufacture and shipment of its products,

13


or to meet the required technical specifications of its products in a timely manner. Such delays could lead to rescheduling of orders in backlog, or in extreme situations, to cancellation of orders. In addition, Intevac may incur substantial unanticipated costs early in a product’s life cycle, such as increased engineering, manufacturing, installation and support costs which may not be able to generate sufficient gross profit to offset expected operating and interest expenses of $17 million to $19 million during 2003. The majority of our revenues and gross profit have historically been derived from sales of thin-film disk manufacturing equipment and deposition and rapid thermal processing equipment for the manufacture of flat panel displays. The Company’s sales of thin-film disk manufacturing equipment have been severely depressed since the middle of 1998. While the Company believes that the thin-film disk manufacturing industry will need to make substantial investments to upgrade its productive capacity within the next year, there can be passedno assurance that this will happen, or that the Company will be selected to provide these upgrades. The Company sold its Rapid Thermal Processing product line to Photon Dynamics in November of 2002, a product line which accounted for $5.0 million of the Company’s net revenues during the nine month period ended September 28, 2002. Additionally, other than for products that are shipped and undergoing installation and acceptance testing, the Company has no current backlog of orders for deposition products for the manufacture of flat panel displays. Photonics Technology Division has yet to earn an annual profit. Failure to generate sufficient net revenues and gross profit in 2003 to offset operating and interest expenses would have an adverse effect on our business, net worth and cash.

We may not have the financial resources to repurchase our convertible notes if one of certain designated

events gives holders the customer. In some instances, Intevacright to require us to repurchase their notes

Certain events give holders of our convertible notes, including both our convertible notes due 2004 (existing notes) and convertible notes due 2009 (exchange notes), the right to require us to repurchase their notes. These events include a transaction that results in a change of control, which is dependent upondescribed very broadly, or if a sole suppliertermination of trading of our common stock occurs, or, a limited numberin the case of suppliers, or has qualifiedthe exchange notes only, a single or limited numberdistribution to all of suppliers, for complex components or sub-assemblies utilized in its products. Anythe holders of our common stock of all the capital stock of a subsidiary that at the time constitutes our Photonics business. If one of these factorsdesignated events were to occur, we may not have enough funds to pay the repurchase price for all notes for which repurchase is requested. Any future credit agreements or other debt agreements may prohibit the repurchase, or may provide that such a repurchase constitutes an event of default under that debt agreement. If we are put in a position where one of these designated events has occurred but we are prohibited from repurchasing the exchange notes, we could adversely affect Intevac’s business.

seek the consent of our lenders to repurchase the existing notes or exchange notes, as the case may be, or could attempt to refinance the debt agreements. If we do not obtain the lenders consent, we could not repurchase the existing or exchange notes. Our failure to repurchase the existing notes or exchange notes would constitute an event of default under the particular indenture governing such notes, which might in turn also constitute an event of default under the terms of our other debt.
 
The Equipment Division is subject to rapid technical change.majority of our new products address new and emerging markets.

     We have invested heavily in the development of products that address new markets. The Photonics Technology Division’s LIVAR® target identification system and low-cost low-light level camera products are designed to offer significantly improved capability to military customers. The Products Group has developed a flexible deposition tool to address growing segments of the flat panel display equipment market that is intended to displace products offered by competing manufacturers. Additionally, the Products Group’s Intensified Imaging Division is developing commercial products based on the technology developed by the Photonics Technology Division. The Photonics Technology and Intensified Imaging Divisions will require

16


substantial further investment in sales and marketing, in product development and in additional production facilities to support the planned transition to volume sales of photonics products to military and commercial customers. There can be no assurance that we will succeed in these activities and generate significant sales of products based on our photonics technology. Failure of any of these products to perform as intended or to successfully penetrate these new markets and develop into profitable product lines would have an adverse effect on our business.

Intevac’s     Demand for capital equipment is cyclical.

     Our Products Group sells capital equipment to capital intensive industries, which sell commodity products such as flat panel displays and disk drives. These industries operate with high fixed costs. When demand for these commodity products exceeds capacity, then demand for new capital equipment such as ours tends to be amplified. When supply of these commodity products exceeds demand, then the demand for new capital equipment such as ours tends to be depressed. The cyclical nature of the capital equipment industry means that in some years sales of new systems by us will be unusually high, and that in other years sales of new systems by us will be severely depressed. We are currently in a period where sales of new systems for disk production are depressed. Failure to anticipate or respond quickly to the industry business cycle could have an adverse effect on our business.

     Our significant amount of debt could have a negative effect on us and on our security holders.

     After completing the exchange of our convertible notes early in the third quarter of 2002, we have $1.3 million of convertible notes due in 2004 (the “existing notes”) and $29.5 million of convertible notes due 2009 (the “exchange notes”) outstanding. The aggregate $30.8 million of notes commit us to substantial principal and interest obligations. Our significant amount of debt could harm Intevac and holders of our common stock and convertible notes in many ways, including:

• reducing the funds available to finance our business operations and for other corporate purposes because a portion of our cash flow from operations must be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our debt;
• impairing our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or general corporate purposes;
• placing us at a competitive disadvantage because we are substantially more leveraged than certain of our competitors;
• hindering our ability to adjust rapidly to changing market conditions; and
• making us more vulnerable financially in the event of a further downturn in general economic conditions or in our business.

     Our ability to meet our debt service obligations will be dependent on our future operating performance and cash flow. Our operating performance and cash flow, in part, are subject to business, financial and economic factors beyond our control.

     We may undertake significant additional financing transactions in order to maintain sufficient cash to
conduct our operations.

     Our cash and cash equivalents was approximately $14.3 million as of September 28, 2002. The sale of our Rapid Thermal Processing Equipment product line in November 2002 increased our cash by approximately $18.0 million. We may need to obtain additional financing to fund our future operations, and we may seek to raise additional funds through a variety of alternative sources, including the sale of additional securities or

17


from other financing arrangements or asset sales. Our board of directors has from time to time considered a number of possible transactions. Such transactions might include:

• attempting to raise additional equity through public or private offerings,
• attempting to raise additional debt financing,
• undertaking a rights offering to obtain financing from our existing shareholders,
• selling off a portion of our assets to raise additional capital, or
• obtaining a line of credit.

     We may undertake one or more of these transactions. We do not know whether we will be able to complete any of these transactions on a timely basis, on terms satisfactory to us, or at all. For example, we may not have access to new capital in the public or private markets until our results of operations improve, if at all. In addition, some of these transactions may result in significant dilution to our existing security holders or impairment of their rights. Nonetheless, if we are unable to complete one or more of these transactions, our ability to maintain our ongoing operations, and to pay principal and interest in cash on our outstanding notes when due, may be jeopardized.

     Our business is subject to rapid technical change.

     Our ability to remain competitive requires substantial investments in research and development. The failure to develop, manufacture and market new systems, or to enhance existing systems, would have an adverse effect on Intevac’sour business. In the past, Intevac has experienced delays fromFrom time to time, we have experienced delays in the introduction of, and technical difficulties with, some of itsour systems and enhancements. Intevac’sOur future success in developing and selling equipment dependswill depend upon a variety of factors, including accurate prediction ofour ability to accurately predict future customer requirements, technologytechnological advances, cost of ownership, our introduction of new products on schedule, cost-effective manufacturing and product performance in the field. Intevac’sOur new product decisions and development commitments must anticipate continuously evolving industry requirements significantly in advance of sales. Any failure to accurately predict customer requirements and to develop new generations of products to meet those requirements would have an adverse effect on Intevac’sour business.

The Photonics Division does not yet generate a significant portion of its revenues from product sales.

     Our products are complex, constantly evolving and are often designed and manufactured to individual
customer requirements that require additional engineering.

     To date the activitiesOur Products Group systems have a large number of components and are highly complex. We may experience delays and technical and manufacturing difficulties in future introductions or volume production of new systems or enhancements. In addition, some of the Photonics Divisionsystems that we manufacture must be customized to meet individual customer site or operating requirements. We have concentrated onlimited manufacturing capacity and engineering resources and may be unable to complete the development, manufacture and shipment of these products, or to meet the required technical specifications for these products in a timely manner. Such delays could lead to rescheduling of orders in backlog, or in extreme situations, to cancellation of orders. In addition, we may incur substantial unanticipated costs early in a product’s life cycle, such as increased engineering, manufacturing, installation and support costs that we may be unable to pass on to the customer. In some instances, we depend upon a sole supplier or a limited number of suppliers for complex components or sub-assemblies utilized in its technology and prototype products that demonstrate this technology. Revenues have been derived primarily from research and development contracts funded by the United States Government and its contractors.products. Any of these factors could adversely affect our business.

     The Company continues to develop standard photonics products for sale to military and commercial customers. The Photonics Division will require substantial further investment in sales and marketing, in product development and in additional production facilities to support the planned transition to volume sales of photonics products to militaryour disk and commercial customers. There can be no assurance that the Company will succeed in these activities and generate significant increases in sales of products based on its photonics technology.

The sales of our equipment products are dependent on substantial capital investment by our customers.

The majority of our Equipment revenues have historically come from the sale of equipment used to manufacture thin-film disks, and to a lesser extent, from the sale of equipment used to manufacture flat panel displays.products are dependent on substantial capital investment by our
customers.

     The purchase of Intevac’sour systems, along withand the purchase of other related equipment and facilities, requires extremely large capital expenditures by our customers. These costs are far in excess of the cost of the Intevac systems.our systems alone. The magnitude of such capital expenditures requires that our customers have access to large amounts of capital and that they are willing to invest that capital over long periods of time to be able to purchase our

18


equipment. Some of our customers, particularly those that would otherwise purchase our disk manufacturing products, may not be willing, or able, to make the magnitude of capital investment required to purchase our products.
The disk drive industry has been severely impacted by excess capacity since 1997.

     Intevac derives a significant proportion of its revenues from sales of equipment to manufacturers of computer disk drives and disk drive components. The disk drive industry has experienced a long period of over-supply, the reduction of the number of disks used per disk drive and intensely competitive pricing. Since 1997, many of the manufacturers of hard disk drives and their component suppliers have reported substantial losses. Some of these manufacturers have gone out of business. Others have been acquired by their customers or by their competitors. Accordingly, the potential market for Intevac’s disk equipment products has been reduced. As a result of these factors, Intevac has experienced significant reductions in its quarterly revenues, and has incurred quarterly losses, since the third quarter of 1998. Additionally, the financial strength of the industry has deteriorated which subjects Intevac to increased credit risk on its accounts receivable. Intevac is

14


not able to accurately predict when the industry conditions that have depressed our disk equipment sales will become more favorable, particularly in light of the current widespread weakness of the economy.required.
 
Demand for capital equipment is cyclical.

Intevac’s Equipment Division sells capital equipment to capital intensive industries, which sell commodity products such as disks, disk drives and flat panel displays. These industries operate with high fixed costs. When demand for these commodity products exceeds capacity, demand for new capital equipment such as Intevac’s tends to be amplified. When supply of these commodity products exceeds capacity, demand for new capital equipment such as Intevac’s tends to be depressed. The cyclical nature of the capital equipment industry means that in some years, such as 1997, sales of new systems by the Company will be unusually high, and that in other years, such as 2001, sales of new systems by the Company will be severely depressed. Failure to anticipate, or respond quickly to the industry business cycle could have an adverse effect on Intevac’s business.

Rapid increases in areal density are reducing the number of thin-film disks required per disk drive.

Over the past few years the amount of data that can be stored on a single thin-film computer disk has been increasing at approximately 100% per year. Although the number of disk drives produced has continued to increase each year, the growth in areal density has resulted in a reduction in the number of disks required per disk drive. TrendFocus, a market research firm specializing in the disk drive industry, projects that number of thin-film disks used worldwide will decline in 2001 from 2000 levels . Without an increase in the number of disks required, Intevac’s disk equipment sales are largely limited to upgrades of existing capacity, rather than capacity expansion.

Our competitors are large and well financed and competition is intense.

     Intevac experiencesWe experience intense competition in the Equipment Division.Products Group. For example, Intevac’s equipmentour disk and flat panel products experience competition worldwide from competitors including Anelva Corporation, Applied Films Corporation, Ulvac Japan, Ltd. and Unaxis Holdings, Ltd., each of which havehas sold substantial numbers of systems worldwide. Anelva, Ulvac and Unaxis all have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, manufacturing and other resources than Intevac.we do. There can be no assurance that Intevac’sour competitors will not develop enhancements to, or future generations of, competitive products that will offer superior price or performance features or that new competitors will not enter Intevac’sour markets and develop such enhanced products.

     Given the lengthy sales cycle and the significant investment required to integrate equipment into the manufacturing process, Intevac believeswe believe that once a manufacturer has selected a particular supplier’s equipment for a specific application, that manufacturer generally relies upon that supplier’s equipment and frequently will continue to purchase any additional equipment for that application from the same supplier. Accordingly, competition for customers in the equipment industry is intense, and suppliers of equipment may offer substantial pricing concessions and incentives to attract new customers or retain existing customers.

 
$41 MillionOur business depends on the integrity of convertible notes are outstanding and will mature in 2004.our intellectual property rights.

     In connection with the sale of $57.5 million of its 6 1/2% Convertible Subordinated Notes Due 2004 (the “Convertible Notes”) in February 1997, Intevac incurred a substantial increase in the ratio of long-term debt to total capitalization (shareholders’ equity plus long-term debt). During 1999 Intevac spent $9.7 million to repurchase $16.3 million of the Convertible Notes. The $41.2 million of the Convertible Notes that remain outstanding as of September 29, 2001 commit Intevac to substantial principal and interest obligations. The degree to which Intevac is leveraged could have an adverse effect on Intevac’s ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, acquisitions or other purposes and could make it more vulnerable to industry downturns and competitive pressures. Intevac’s ability to meet its debt service obligations will be dependent on Intevac’s future performance, which will be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting the operations of Intevac, many of which are beyond its control.

15


Intevac’s business is dependent on its intellectual property.

     There can be no assurance that:

 • any of Intevac’sour pending or future patent applications will be allowed or that any of the allowed applications will be issued as patents, orpatents;
 
 • any patent owned by Intevacof our patents will not be invalidated, deemed unenforceable, circumvented or challenged, orchallenged;
 
 • the rights granted under our patents will provide competitive advantages to Intevac, orus;
 
 • any of Intevac’sour pending or future patent applications will be issuedissue with claims of the scope sought by Intevac,us, if at all, orall;
 
 • others will not develop similar products, duplicate Intevac’sour products or design around the patents owned by Intevac,our patents; or
 
 • foreign patent rights, intellectual property laws or Intevac’sour agreements will adequately protect Intevac’sour intellectual property rights.

     Failure to adequately protect Intevac’sour intellectual property rights could have an adverse effect upon Intevac’sour business.

     From time to time, Intevac haswe have received claims that it iswe are infringing third parties’ intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance that third parties will not in the future claim infringement by Intevacus with respect to current or future patents, trademarks, or other proprietary rights relating to Intevac’sour disk sputtering systems, flat panel manufacturing equipment or other products. Any present or future claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require Intevacus to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to Intevac,us, or at all. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse effect upon Intevac’sour business.

 
Our operating results fluctuate significantly.

     Over the last eleven quarters Intevac’sour operating loss as a percentage of net revenues has fluctuated frombetween approximately (79%) to (8%)59% and 1% of net revenues. Over the same period our sales per quarter have fluctuated between $13.8$23.6 million and $5.9 million. Intevac anticipatesWe anticipate that itsour sales and operating margins will continue to fluctuate. As a result, period-to-period comparisons of itsour results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future performance.

Intevac’s stock price is volatile.

     Intevac’s stock price has experienced both significant increases in valuation, and significant decreases in valuation, over short periods of time. Intevac believes that factors such as announcements of developments related to Intevac’s business, fluctuations in Intevac’s operating results, failure to meet securities analysts’ expectations, general conditions in the disk drive and thin-film media manufacturing industries and the worldwide economy, announcements of technological innovations, new systems or product enhancements by Intevac or its competitors, fluctuations in the level of cooperative development funding, acquisitions, changes in governmental regulations, developments in patents or other intellectual property rights and changes in Intevac’s relationships with customers and suppliers could cause the price of Intevac’s Common Stock to continue to fluctuate substantially. In addition, in recent years the stock market in general, and the market for small capitalization and high technology stocks in particular, has experienced extreme price fluctuations which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of affected companies. Any of these factors could adversely affect the market price of Intevac’s Common Stock.

1619


 
Thin-film disks could be replaced by a new technology.Operating costs in northern California are high.

     Intevac believes that thin-film disks will continue to beOur operations are located in Santa Clara, California. The cost of living in northern California is extremely high, which increases both the dominant medium for data storage forcost of doing business and the foreseeable future. However, it is possible that competing technologies may at some time reduce the demand for thin-film disks, which would adversely affect Intevac’s disk equipment business.

Competition is intense for employees in northern California.

Intevac’scost and difficulty of recruiting new employees. Our operating results depend in significant part upon itsour ability to effectively manage costs and to retain and attract qualified management, engineering, marketing, manufacturing, customer support, sales and administrative personnel. Competition in northern California for such personnel is intense. The cost of living in northern California is also extremely high, which further increases the cost and difficulty of recruiting new employees. There can be no assurance that Intevac will be successful in attracting new employees and retaining its staff. The failure to control costs and to attract and retain suchqualified personnel could have an adverse effect on Intevac’sour business.

 
Business interruptions could adversely affect our business.

     Intevac’sOur operations are vulnerable to interruption by fire, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failure and other events beyond our control. For example,Additionally, the Company’s facility in California has been subject, in the last year,costs of electricity and natural gas have increased significantly. Any further cost increases will impact our ability to electrical blackouts as a consequence of a shortage of available electrical power. These types of disruptions, or other unanticipated disruptions, could adversely impact the Company’sachieve profitability.

 
A portionmajority of our sales are made to international customers.

     Sales and operating activities outside of the United States are subject to certain inherent risks, including fluctuations in the value of the United States dollar relative to foreign currencies, tariffs, quotas, taxes and other market barriers, political and economic instability, restrictions on the export or import of technology, potentially limited intellectual property protection, difficulties in staffing and managing international operations and potentially adverse tax consequences. Intevac earnsWe earn a significant portion of itsour revenue from international sales, and there can be no assurance that any of these factors will not have an adverse effect on Intevac’sour business.

     IntevacWe generally quotesquote and sells itssell our products in US dollars. However, for some Japanese customers, Intevac quoteswe quote and sells itssell our products in Japanese Yen. Intevac, fromFrom time to time, enterswe enter into foreign currency contracts in an effort to reduce the overall risk of currency fluctuations to Intevac’sour business. However, there can be no assurance that the offer and sale of products denominated in foreign denominated currencies, and the related foreign currency hedging activities will not adversely affect Intevac’sour business.

     Intevac’sOur two principal competitors for disk sputtering equipment are based in foreign countries and have cost structures based on foreign currencies. Accordingly, currency fluctuations could cause Intevac’sthe price of our products to be more, or less, competitive than itsour competitors’ products. Currency fluctuations will decrease, or increase, Intevac’s cost structure relative to those of its competitors, which could impact Intevac’s gross margins.our competitive position.

 
IntevacWe expect the market price of our common stock and convertible notes to be volatile.

The market price of our common stock has experienced both significant increases in valuation and significant decreases in valuation, over short periods of time. We believe that factors such as announcements of developments related to our business, fluctuations in our operating results, failure to meet securities analysts’ expectations, general conditions in the disk drive and thin-film media manufacturing industries and the worldwide economy, announcements of technological innovations, new systems or product enhancements by us or our competitors, fluctuations in the level of cooperative development funding, acquisitions, changes in governmental regulations, developments in patents or other intellectual property rights and changes in our relationships with customers and suppliers could cause the price of our common stock to continue to fluctuate substantially. In addition, in recent years the stock market in general, and the market for small capitalization and high technology stocks in particular, have experienced extreme price fluctuations that have often been unrelated to the operating performance of affected companies. Any of these factors could adversely affect the market price of our common stock and the market price of our notes that are convertible into such common stock.

We routinely evaluatesevaluate acquisition candidates and other diversification strategies.

     Intevac hasWe have completed multiple acquisitions as part of itsour efforts to growexpand and diversify itsour business. For example, Intevac’sour business was initially acquired from Varian Associates in 1991. Additionally, Intevacwe acquired its current our

20


gravity lubrication CSS test equipment and rapid thermal processing product lines in threetwo acquisitions. IntevacWe also acquired itsthe RPC electron beam processing business in late 1997, and subsequently closed this business. Intevac intendsWe sold the rapid thermal processing product line in November 2002. We intend to continue to evaluate new acquisition candidates, divestiture and diversification strategies. Any acquisition will involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the acquired company’s employees, operations and products, uncertainties associated with operating in new markets and working with new customers, and the potential loss of the acquired company’s key employees. Additionally, unanticipated expenses, difficulties and consequences may be incurred relating to the integration of technologies, research and development, and administrative and other functions. Any future acquisitions may result in potentially dilutive issuances

17


issuance of equity securities, acquisition or divestiture related write-offs and the assumption of debt and contingent liabilities. Any of the above factors could adversely affect Intevac’sour business.
 
Intevac usesWe use hazardous materials.

     Intevac isWe are subject to a variety of governmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, handling, emission, generation, manufacture, treatment and disposal of toxic or otherotherwise hazardous substances, chemicals, materials or waste. Any failure to comply with current or future regulations could result in substantial civil penalties or criminal fines being imposed on Intevacus or itsour officers, directors or employees, suspension of production, alteration of itsour manufacturing process or cessation of operations. Such regulations could require Intevacus to acquire expensive remediation or abatement equipment or to incur substantial expenses to comply with environmental regulations. Any failure by Intevacus to properly manage the use, disposal or storage of, or adequately restrict the release of, hazardous or toxic substances could subject Intevacus to significant liabilities.

     A majority of the Common Stock outstanding is controlled by the directors and executive officers of Intevac.

Our directors and executive officers control a majority of our outstanding common stock.

     Based on the shares outstanding on September 29, 2001, the present28, 2002, our current directors and their affiliates and our executive officers, in the aggregate, beneficially own a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. As a result, thesecommon stock. These shareholders, acting together, are able to effectively control all matters requiring approval by theour shareholders, of Intevac, including the election of a majority of the directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. Two of our directors also hold 7% of the outstanding convertible notes.

Item 3.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

     Interest rate risk.The Company’s exposure to market risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to the Company’s investment portfolio. The Company does not use derivative financial instruments in its investment portfolio. The Company places its investments with high quality credit rated issuers and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one issuer. Short-term investments typically consist of investments in commercial paper and market auction rate bonds.

The table below presents principal amounts and related weighted-average interest rates by year of maturity for the Company’s investment portfolio andour debt obligations.obligations as of September 28, 2002.

                                  
Fair
20012002200320042005BeyondTotalValue








(In thousands)
Cash equivalents                                
 Variable rate $21,428                 $21,428  $21,428 
 Average rate  3.21%                       
Long-term debt                                
 Fixed rate          $41,245        $41,245  $21,447 
 Average rate  6.50%  6.50%  6.50%  6.50%              
                                  
Fair
20022003200420052006BeyondTotalValue








(In thousands)
Long-term debt                                
 Fixed rate       $1,275        $29,543  $30,818  $30,181 
 Average rate  6.50%  6.50%  6.50%  6.50%  6.50%  6.50%        

     Foreign exchange risk.From time to time, the Company enterswe enter into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to economically hedge certain of itsour anticipated foreign currency transaction, translation and re-measurement exposures. The objective of these contracts is to minimize the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements on the Company’sour operating results. At September 29, 2001, the Company28, 2002, we had no foreign currency forward exchange contracts.

18Item 4.     Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.Within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”), we evaluated, under the supervision of our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we

21


file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes in internal controls.Subsequent to the Evaluation Date, there were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect such controls, including any corrective actions with regards to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

PART II.     OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.     Legal Proceedings

     On June 12, 1996 two Australian Army Black Hawk Helicopters collided in midair during nighttime maneuvers. Eighteen Australian servicemen perished and twelve were injured. The Company was named as a defendant in a lawsuit related to this crash. The lawsuit was filed in Stamford, Connecticut Superior Court on June 10, 1999 by Mark Durkin, the administrator of the estates of the deceased crewmembers, the injured crewmembers and the spouses of the deceased and/or injured crewmembers. Included in the suit’s allegations arewere assertions that the crash was caused by defective night vision goggles. The suit namesnamed three US manufacturers of military night vision goggles, of which Intevac was one. The suit also namesnamed the manufacturer of the pilot’s helmets, two manufacturers of night vision system test equipment and the manufacturer of the helicopter. The suit claimsclaimed damages for 13 personnel killed in the crash, 5 personnel injured in the crash and spouses of those killed or injured. It is known that the Australian Army established a Board of Inquiry to investigate the accident and that one of the conclusions of the Board of Inquiry concludedwas that the accident was not caused by defective night vision goggles.

     On July 27, 2000 the Connecticut Superior Court disallowed the defendants’ motion to dismiss the lawsuit. That decision was appealed to the Connecticut Supreme Court. On October 30, 2001 the Connecticut Supreme Court reversed the Superior Court’s decision and remanded the case to the trial court with the direction to grant the defendants’ motionsmotion to dismiss the suit subject to conditions already agreed to by the defendants. These conditions agreed to by the defendants include (1) consenting to jurisdiction in Australia; (2) accepting service of process in connection with an action in Australia; (3) making their personnel and records available for litigation in Australia; (4) waiving any applicable statutes of limitation in Australia up to six months from April 26, 2002, the date of dismissal of this action or for such other reasonable time as may be required as a condition of dismissing this action; (5) satisfying any judgement that may be entered against them in Australia; and (6) consenting to the reopening of the action in Connecticut in the event the above conditions are not met as to any proper defendant in the action. At this time, Intevac does not know whether the plaintiffs will choose to recommence litigation against the Company in Australia. Any such action could expose Intevac to further risk, plus the expense and uncertainties of defending the matter in a distant foreign jurisdiction.

     On June 12, 2001October 21, 2002 a lawsuit was filed in Queensland, Australia by Gerard Bampton, a member of the Australian Special Air Services Regiment who was injured in the 1996 crash. Included in the suit’s allegations are assertions that the crash was caused by defective night vision goggles. The suit names three US manufacturers of military night vision goggles, of which Intevac was one. The suit also names the manufacturer of the helicopters. Investigations made at the time of the original Durkin lawsuit lead the Company filed a complaint in Santa Clara County Superior Court, State of California, against Intarsia Corporation. The complaint relates to Intarsia’s cancellation of an order for a customized sputtering system and seeks damages of at least $3.3 million. On July 26, 2001 Intarsia filed a cross-complaintbelieve that it has meritorious defenses against the Company innew lawsuit. However, there can be no assurance that the Santa Clara County Superior Court. On August 14, 2001,resolution of the Company filedsuit will not have a demurrer tomaterial adverse effect on the cross-complaintCompany’s business, operating results and on October 11, 2001, Intarsia filed an amended cross-complaint. The amended cross-complaint includes allegations of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract and breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and seeks damages in the amount of $349,000 plus additional relief as may be deemed appropriate by the court. The Company believes it has a meritorious case and defenses, but in the event the Company does not prevail, the Company could be liable for $349,000 plus any other relief awarded Intarsia by the court.financial condition.

Item 2.     Changes in Securities

     None.In connection with the completion of the exchange offer for its 6 1/2% convertible subordinated notes due 2004 on July 12, 2002 (as further described in Note 6 of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements), the Company issued a total of $29,543,000 principal amount of its new 6 1/2% convertible subordinated notes due 2009. The notes are convertible into the Common Stock of the Company at a conversion price of $7.00 per share. The issuance of such securities was made in reliance on Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act of 1933.

22


Item 3.     Defaults upon Senior Securities

     None.

Item 4.     Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersSecurity-Holders

     None.

19


Item 5.     Other Information

     None.

Item 6.     Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

     (a) The following exhibits are filed herewith:

Exhibit
NumberDescription


99.1Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

     None.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K:

     None.

2023


SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

   
  INTEVAC, INC.
 
Date: November 12, 20012002 By: /s/ NORMAN H. PONDKEVIN FAIRBAIRN

Norman H. PondKevin Fairbairn
Chairman of the Board andPresident, Chief Executive Officer (Principaland Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
Date: November 12, 20012002 By: /s/ CHARLES B. EDDY III

Charles B. Eddy III
Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

2124


     I, Kevin Fairbairn certify that:

     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intevac, Inc.;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

     6.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 12, 2002

/s/ KEVIN FAIRBAIRN
_______________________________________
Kevin Fairbairn
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

25


     I, Charles B. Eddy certify that:

     1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Intevac, Inc.;
     2.     Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
     3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
     4.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and have:

     a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
     b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
     c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

     5.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

     a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
     b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

     6.     The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 12, 2002

/s/ CHARLES B. EDDY III

Charles B. Eddy III
Vice President, Finance and Administration,
Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary

26


EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit
NumberDescription


99.1Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

27