SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                           Washington, D.C.  20549


                                  FORM 10-Q

              Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
                   of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
              for the Quarterly Period Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2000


                        Commission File Number 1-9608

                           NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC.

           (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

                DELAWARE                            36-3514169
               ---------                            ----------
    (State or other jurisdiction of              (I.R.S. Employer
     incorporation or organization)            Identification No.)


                          29 East Stephenson Street
                        Freeport, Illinois 61032-0943
                  (Address of principal executive offices)
                                 (Zip Code)

                               (815) 235-4171
            (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
   reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
   Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been
   subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

                  Yes /x/                       No /  /

      Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding (net of treasury
   shares) as of August 2,October 25, 2000:  266,574,627266,578,587


   PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION
   Item 1.   Financial Statements

NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited, in thousands, except per share data) Three Months Ended SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, JuneSeptember 30, ----------------- --------------------------------- 2000 1999 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- ---- Net sales $1,711,515 $1,597,314 $3,262,359 $3,113,507$1,686,741 $1,609,480 $4,949,100 $4,722,987 Cost of products sold 1,224,039 1,176,508 2,366,399 2,269,3931,217,988 1,164,910 3,584,387 3,434,303 --------- --------- --------- --------- GROSS INCOME 487,476 420,806 895,960 844,114468,753 444,570 1,364,713 1,288,684 Selling, general and administrative expenses 221,589 322,528 461,197 582,493214,509 267,485 675,706 849,978 Restructuring costs 7,774 8,697 8,537 186,7214,243 14,506 12,780 201,227 Goodwill amortization and other 12,496 12,625 25,718 24,66313,378 12,692 39,096 37,355 --------- --------- --------- --------- OPERATING INCOME 245,617 76,956 400,508 50,237 --------- --------- --------- ---------236,623 149,887 637,131 200,124 Nonoperating expenses: Interest expense 33,988 24,440 61,837 49,70133,184 26,012 95,021 75,713 Other, net 3,475 3,246 6,582 6,2883,440 4,634 10,022 10,922 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net nonoperating expenses 37,463 27,686 68,419 55,98936,624 30,646 105,043 86,635 --------- --------- --------- --------- INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES 208,154 49,270 332,089 (5,752)199,999 119,241 532,088 113,489 Income taxes 80,139 19,216 127,854 43,19377,000 46,504 204,854 89,697 --------- --------- --------- --------- NET INCOME (LOSS) $ 128,015122,999 $ 30,054 $204,23572,737 $ (48,945)327,234 $ 23,792 ========= ========= ======== =================== ========= Earnings (loss) per share: Basic $ 0.480.46 $ 0.110.26 $ 0.761.22 $ (0.17)0.08 Diluted 0.48 0.11 0.76 (0.17)0.46 0.26 1.22 0.08 Dividends per share $ 0.21 $ 0.20 $ 0.420.63 $ 0.400.60 Weighted average shares outstanding: Basic 266,542 281,830 270,300 281,639266,567 281,937 269,056 281,738 Diluted 276,492 281,830 270,300 281,639276,500 292,041 278,987 281,738 See notes to consolidated financial statements.
2
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited, in thousands) JuneSeptember 30, % of December 31, % of 2000 Total 1999 Total --------------------- ----- ----------------------- ----- ASSETS CURRENT ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 15,897 0.2%21,439 0.3% $ 102,164 1.5% Accounts receivable, net 1,224,305 18.0%1,236,989 18.2% 1,178,423 17.5% Inventories, net 1,200,547 17.6%1,170,533 17.3% 1,034,794 15.4% Deferred income taxes 245,589 3.6%260,914 3.8% 250,587 3.7% Prepaid expenses and other 160,703164,401 2.4% 172,601 2.6% --------- --------- --------- --------- TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS 2,847,041 41.8%2,854,276 42.0% 2,738,569 40.7% MARKETABLE EQUITY SECURITIES 8,8136,892 0.1% 10,799 0.2% OTHER LONG-TERM INVESTMENTS 70,216 1.0%71,863 1.1% 65,905 1.0% OTHER ASSETS 294,678 4.3%308,228 4.5% 335,699 5.0% PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET 1,573,580 23.1%1,573,960 23.2% 1,548,191 23.0% TRADE NAMES AND GOODWILL 2,025,027 29.7%1,973,309 29.1% 2,024,925 30.1% --------- --------- --------- --------- TOTAL ASSETS $6,819,355$6,788,528 100.0% $6,724,088 100.0% ========== ===== ========== ===== 3 NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONT.) (Unaudited, in thousands) JuneSeptember 30, % of December 31, % of 2000 Total 1999 Total --------------------- ----- ----------------------- ----- LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY CURRENT LIABILITIES Notes payable $ 72,031 1.1%19,501 0.3% $ 97,291 1.4% Accounts payable 340,930 5.0%343,511 5.1% 376,596 5.6% Accrued compensation 103,883103,236 1.5% 113,373 1.7% Other accrued liabilities 809,550 11.9%781,421 11.5% 892,481 13.3% Income taxes 54,416 0.8%92,523 1.3% - - Current portion of long-term debt 150,015 2.2%100,017 1.5% 150,142 2.2% --------- --------- --------- --------- TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES 1,530,825 22.5%1,440,209 21.2% 1,629,883 24.2% LONG-TERM DEBT 2,008,218 29.4%2,064,746 30.4% 1,455,779 21.7% OTHER NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES 350,894345,477 5.1% 354,107 5.3% DEFERRED INCOME TAXES 85,017 1.3%58,877 0.9% 85,655 1.3% MINORITY INTEREST 1,1371,181 0.0% 1,658 0.0% COMPANY-OBLIGATED MANDATORILY REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED SECURITIES OF A SUBSIDIARY TRUST 500,000 7.3%7.4% 500,000 7.4% STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Common stock - authorized shares, 800.0 million at $1 par value; 282,122282,170 4.1% 282,026 4.2% Outstanding shares: 2000 282.1282.2 million 1999 282.0 million Treasury stock (407,459) (5.9)%stock; (407,458) (6.0%) (2,760) (0.1)%(0.1%) Outstanding shares: 2000 15.6 million 1999 0.1 million Additional paid-in capital 214,017 3.1%214,868 3.2% 213,112 3.2% Retained earnings 2,425,604 35.6%2,492,564 36.7% 2,334,609 34.7% Accumulated other comprehensive income (171,020) (2.5)%loss (204,106) (3.0%) (129,981) (1.9)% ----------(1.9%) --------- ----- ------------------- ----- TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY 2,343,264 34.4%2,378,038 35.0% 2,697,006 40.1% ---------- ----- ---------- -------------- ---- --------- ---- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $6,819,355$6,788,528 100.0% $6,724,088 100.0% ========== ====== =============== ========= ===== See notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited, in thousands) For the SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, ------------------------------------------------- 2000 1999 ---- ---- OPERATING ACTIVITIES: OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net Income (loss) $ 204,235 $(48,945)income 327,234 23,792 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 154,153 141,265221,837 198,202 Deferred income taxes 6,270 18,808(32,992) 25,061 Net loss on marketable equity securities - 822 Other (4,851) 111,354(6,813) 159,323 Changes in current accounts, excluding the effects of acquisitions: Accounts receivable (37,745) (107,623)(53,870) (123,436) Inventories (171,959) (93,204)(145,570) (57,339) Other current assets 6,824 (33,532)1,164 (12,756) Accounts payable (39,742) (2,306)(31,025) 1,416 Accrued liabilities and other (13,910) 38,279 ---------- ----------4,873 73,210 --------- ------- NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES $ 103,275284,838 $ 24,096 ---------- ----------288,295 --------- --------- INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Acquisitions, net $ (68,147)(70,790) $ (35,334)(34,907) Expenditures for property, plant and equipment (159,067) (89,031)(240,501) (139,726) Sale of marketable equity securities - 11,438 Disposals of non-current assets and other 8,302 11,250 ---------- ----------15,504 22,301 --------- --------- NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES $ (218,912)(295,787) $ (113,115) ---------- ----------(140,894) --------- --------- 5 NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (CONT.) (Unaudited, in thousands) For the SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, ------------------------------------------------- 2000 1999 ---- ---- FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Proceeds from issuance of debt $ 768,075 $719,424831,945 $548,779 Payments on notes payableandpayable and long-term debt (219,176) (577,889)(324,939) (603,812) Proceeds from exercised stock options and other (989) 25,963(147) 26,537 Common stock repurchase (402,962) - Cash dividends (113,121) (112,989)(169,102) (169,437) --------- ----------------- NET CASH PROVIDED BYUSED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES $ 31,827 $ 54,509(65,205) $(197,933) --------- ----------------- Exchange rate effect on cash (2,457) (3,048)(4,571) (2,040) DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS $ (86,267)(80,725) $ (37,558)(52,572) Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 102,164 86,554 --------- --------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD $ 15,89721,439 $ 48,99633,982 ========= ========= Supplemental cash flow disclosures - Cash paid during the period for: Income taxes $ 49,626121,315 $ 87,327105,995 Interest $ 79,199133,768 $ 60,903100,841 See notes to consolidated financial statements.
6 NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS NOTE 1 - GENERAL INFORMATION The condensed financial statements included herein have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and reflect all adjustments necessary to present a fair statement of the results for the periods reported, subject to normal recurring year-end adjustments,adjust- ments, none of which is expected to be material. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company's latest Annual Report on Form 10-K. NOTE 2 - ACQUISITIONS The Company acquired Mersch SA ("Mersch") on January 24, 2000 and Brio on May 24, 2000. Both are manufacturers and suppliers of picture frames in Europe, and now operate as part of Newell Frames and Albums Europe. For these and for other minor acquisitions, the Company paid $47.3$50.8 million in cash and assumed $10.4$10.6 million of debt. The transactions were accounted for as purchases; therefore, results of operations are included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements since their respective acquisition dates. The acquisition costs were allocated on a preliminary basis to the fair market value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed and resulted in trade names and goodwill of approximately $29.3$31.2 million. The Company began to formulate an integration plan for these acquisitions as of their respective acquisition dates. These plans may include exit costs for certain plants and product lines and employee terminations associated with the integrations. The final adjustments to the purchase price allocations are not expected to be material to the consolidated financial statements. The unaudited consolidated results of operations for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2000 and 1999 on a pro forma basis, as though the Mersch and Brio businesses (as well as the 1999 acquisitionsacquisi- tions of Ateliers 28, Reynolds, McKechnie and Ceanothe) had been acquired on January 1, 1999, are as follows: 7 SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, --------------------------------- (in millions, except per share amounts) 2000 1999 ---- ---- Net sales $3,275.8 $3,314.2$ 4,962.5 $ 5,018.6 Net income (loss) $ 204.0327.0 $ (48.4)24.0 Basic earnings (loss per share)share $ 0.751.22 $ (0.17)0.09 NOTE 3 - RESTRUCTURING COSTS In the first sixnine months of 2000, the Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $8.5$12.8 million ($5.27.9 million after taxes). This restructuring charge included primarily severance and$5.6 million of facility exit costs, $4.8 million of severance costs, $1.7 million of costs to exit contractual commitments and $0.7 million of discontinued product lines. Most of these restructuring charges were associated with the integration of the Rubbermaid businesses into Newell. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2000, $14.3$12.6 million of reserves remain for the 1999 restructuring program.remain. These reserves consist primarily of $6.5$5.5 million for exit costs associated with the closure of four facilities, $ 5.3$4.7 million in contractual future maintenance costs on abandoned Rubbermaid computer software and $2.4 million for exit costs associated with discontinued product lines at Little Tikes and $0.1 million for severance and termination benefits.Tikes. NOTE 4 - INVENTORIES Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. The components of inventories, net of LIFO reserve, were as follows (in millions): JuneSeptember 30, December 31, 2000 1999 -------------------- ------------ Materials and supplies $ 278.5249.7 $ 240.0 Work in process 180.5179.0 149.5 Finished products 741.5741.8 645.3 -------- --------- $1,200.5--------- $ 1,170.5 $ 1,034.8 ================= ========= 8 NOTE 5 - PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (in millions): JuneSeptember 30, December 31, 2000 1999 -------- ----------------------- ------------ Land $ 61.158.9 $ 63.4 Buildings and improvements 692.1688.6 691.3 Machinery and equipment 2,272.22,265.5 2,200.7 --------- --------- $ 3,025.43,013.0 $ 2,955.4 Allowance for depreciation (1,451.8)(1,439.0) (1,407.2) --------- --------- $ 1,573.61,574.0 $ 1,548.2 ========= ========= Replacements and improvements are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expense. The components of depreciation are provided by annual charges to income calculated to amortize, principally on the straight-line basis, the cost of the depreciable assets over their depreciable lives. Estimated useful lives determined by the Company are: buildings and improvements (5-40 years) and machinery and equipment (2-15 years). NOTE 6 - LONG-TERM DEBT Long-term debt consisted of the following (in millions): JuneSeptember 30, December 31, 2000 1999 -------- ------------------------ ------------ Medium-term notes $ 1,159.51,109.5 $ 859.5 Commercial paper 993.01,050.0 718.5 Other long-term debt 5.75.2 27.9 ----------------- -------- $ 2,158.22,164.7 $ 1,605.9 Current portion (150.0)(100.0) (150.1) --------- ----------------- -------- $ 2,008.22,064.7 $ 1,455.8 ========= ================= ======== At JuneSeptember 30, 2000, $993.0$1,050.0 million (principal amount) of long-term commercial paper was outstanding. The entire amount is classified as 9 long-term debt because the amount is backed by long-terma long- term revolving credit.credit agreement. 9 NOTE 7 - EARNINGS PER SHARE The earnings (loss) per share amounts are computed based on the weighted average monthly number of shares outstanding during the year. "Basic" earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by weighted average shares outstanding. "Diluted" earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income (loss) by weighted average shares outstanding, including the assumption of the exercise and/or conversion of all potentially dilutive securities ("in the money" stock options and company-obligated mandatorily redeemable convertible preferred securities of a subsidiary trust). A reconciliation of the difference between basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the first sixnine months of 2000 and 1999 is shown below (in millions, except per share data):
Convertible Basic "In the money" Preferred Diluted Method stock options Securities Method ------ --------------------------- ------------ --------------- Three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2000: Net Income $ 128.0 -123.0 N/A $ 4.1 $ 132.1127.1 Weighted average shares outstanding 266.5 0.1266.6 0.0 9.9 276.5 Earnings per Share $ 0.480.46 - - $ 0.480.46 Three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1999: Net Income $ 30.172.7 N/A N/A4.1 $ 30.176.8 Weighted average shares outstanding 281.8 N/A N/A 281.8281.9 0.2 9.9 292.0 Earnings per Share (1) $ 0.110.26 - - $ 0.11 First six0.26 Nine months ended September 30, 2000: Net Income $ 204.2327.2 N/A N/A12.3 $ 204.2339.5 Weighted average shares outstanding 270.3 N/A N/A 270.3269.1 0.0 9.9 279.0 Earnings per Share (1) $ 0.761.22 - - $ 0.76 First six1.22 Nine months ended September 30, 1999: Net LossIncome $ (48.9)23.8 N/A N/A0.0 $ (48.9)23.8 Weighted average shares outstanding 281.6 N/A N/A 281.6 Loss281.7 0.0 0.0 281.7 Earnings per Share (1)(A) $ (0.17)0.08 - - $ (0.17) (1)0.08 (A) Diluted earnings (loss) per share for these periods excludethis period excludes the impact of "in the money" stock options and convertible preferred securities because they are antidilutive.
10 NOTE 8 - COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) The following tables display Comprehensive Income (Loss) and the components of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), in millions: SixNine months ended JuneSeptember 30, ----------------- 2000 1999 ---- ---- Comprehensive Income (Loss): Net income (loss) $ 204.2 $(48.9)327.2 $ 23.8 Unrealized gain (loss) on (2.6) 4.5 marketable securities (1.4) 4.5 Foreign currency translation (39.6) (29.8)(loss) (71.5) (35.1) ------- ------ Total Comprehensive Income (Loss) $ 163.2 $(74.2)253.1 $(6.8) ======= ======
Net Foreign Accumulated Unrealized ForeignCurrency Other Gain/(Loss) CurrencyTranslation Comprehensive on Securities Translation Income (Loss) Loss --------------- ----------- ------------- Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss): Balance at December 31, 1999 $ 0.1 $ (130.1) $ (130.0) Change during sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2000 (1.4) (39.6) (41.0) ------- --------- ---------(2.6) (71.5) (74.1) ------ -------- -------- Balance at JuneSeptember 30, 2000 $ (1.3)(2.5) $ (169.7)(201.6) $ (171.0) ======= ========= =========(204.1) ====== ======== ========
11 NOTE 9 - INDUSTRY SEGMENT INFORMATION The Company's results by business segment were as follows, in millions:
For the three months For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, ended JuneSeptember 30, ----------------------- -------------------- ------------------ 2000 1999 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- ---- Net Sales -------------------------------------------------------------- Plastic Storage & Organization $ 443.3433.2 $ 444.8435.9 $ 853.41,286.6 $ 892.01,327.9 Home Decor 332.2 320.0 645.7 613.8326.4 327.8 972.1 941.6 Office Products 367.4 332.7 621.1 576.2326.9 309.3 948.0 885.5 Infant/Juvenile Care & Play 222.7 193.0 453.7 414.9221.5 194.4 675.2 609.3 Hardware & Tools 184.4 148.2 353.9 285.0181.1 147.7 535.0 432.7 Food Preparation, Cooking & Serving 161.6 158.6 334.6 331.6197.6 194.4 532.2 526.0 -------- -------- -------- -------- $1,711.6 $1,597.3 $3,262.4 $3,113.5$1,686.7 $1,609.5 $4,949.1 $4,723.0 ======== ======== ======== ======== 11 Operating Income -------------------------------------------------------------- Plastic Storage & Organization $ 52.658.0 $ (71.8)33.3 $ 95.6153.6 $ (23.5)9.8 Home Decor 44.6 46.9 73.7 78.543.3 40.0 117.0 118.5 Office Products 96.3 80.6 133.1 111.762.4 46.7 195.5 158.4 Infant/Juvenile Care & Play 26.9 4.7 57.0 25.025.3 (0.8) 82.3 24.2 Hardware & Tools 32.1 29.9 52.7 50.335.1 27.3 87.8 77.6 Food Preparation, Cooking & Serving 20.1 16.4 37.0 35.735.3 34.8 72.3 70.5 Corporate (19.3) (21.0) (40.1) (40.7) --------(18.6) (16.9) (58.6) (57.7) ------ ------ ------ 253.3 85.7 409.0 237.0------ 240.8 164.4 649.9 401.3 Restructuring costs (7.7) (8.7) (8.5) (186.7) --------(4.2) (14.5) (12.8) (201.2) ------ ------ ------ $245.6 $77.0 $400.5 $50.3 ========------ $236.6 $149.9 $637.1 $200.1 ====== ====== ====== ======
JuneSeptember 30, Dec.December 31, 2000 1999 -------- -------------------- ------------ Identifiable Assets ---------------------------------------------------------------- Plastic Storage & Organization $1,176.9$1,178.3 $1,155.3 Home Decor 804.2821.4 818.0 Office Products 825.8745.8 720.9 Infant/Juvenile Care & Play 474.7490.1 433.9 Hardware & Tools 373.9368.1 376.5 Food Preparation, Cooking & Serving 544.7567.4 539.8 Corporate 2,619.22,617.4 2,679.7 -------- -------- $6,819.4$6,788.5 $6,724.1 ======== ========
12 Operating income is net sales less cost of products sold and selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses, but is not affected either by nonoperating (income) expenses or by income taxes. Nonoperating (income) expenses consists principally of net interest expense. In calculating operating income for individual business segments, certain headquarter expenses of an operational nature are allocated to business segments primarily on a net sales basis. Trade names and goodwill amortization is considered a corporate expense and not allocated to business segments. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated and transfers of finished goods between areas are not significant. Corporate assets primarily include trade names and goodwill, equity investments and deferred tax assets. NOTE 10 - NEW ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES Effective January 1, 2001,PRONOUNCEMENTS Since June 1998, the Company will adoptFinancial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") has issued SFAS No.Nos. 133, 137 and 138 related to "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." Management believesActivities" ("SFAS No. 133, as amended" or "Statements"). These Statements establish accounting and reporting standards requiring that every derivative instrument be recorded on the balance sheet as either an asset or liability measured at its fair value. The Statements require that changes in the derivative's fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met, in which case the gains or losses would offset the related results of the hedged item. The Company is required to adopt these Statements on January 1, 2001. While the impact of the adoption of this statement willis dependent on the fair value of our derivatives at the date of adoption, the impact of adopting SFAS 133, as amended, is not beexpected to have a material toimpact on the consolidated financial statements. 12However, the adoption of these Statements could increase volatility in earnings and other comprehensive income. 13 PART I Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND FINANCIAL CONDITION Results of Operations --------------------- The following table sets forth for the periods indicated items from the Consolidated Statements of Income as a percentage of net sales.
Three Months Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, ------------------ ---------------- 2000 1999 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- ---- Net sales 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Cost of products sold 71.5% 73.7% 72.5% 72.9% ----- ----- ----- ----- GROSS INCOME 28.5% 26.3% 27.5% 27.1% Selling, general and administrative expenses 12.9% 20.2% 14.1% 18.7%Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended September 30, September 30, ------------------ ----------------- 2000 1999 2000 1999 ---- ---- ---- ---- Net sales 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Cost of products sold 72.2% 72.4% 72.4% 72.7% ----- ----- ----- ----- GROSS INCOME 27.8% 27.6% 27.6% 27.3% Selling, general and administrative expenses 12.7% 16.6% 13.7% 18.0% Restructuring costs 0.3% 0.9% 0.2% 4.3% Trade names and goodwill amortization and other 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% ----- ----- ----- ----- OPERATING INCOME 14.0% 9.3% 12.9% 4.2% ----- ----- ----- ----- Nonoperating expenses: Interest expense 1.9% 1.6% 1.9% 1.6% Other, net 0.2% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% ----- ----- ----- ----- Net nonoperating expenses 2.1% 1.9% 2.1% 1.8% ----- ----- ----- ----- INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 11.9% 7.4% 10.8% 2.4% Income taxes 4.6% 2.9% 4.2% 1.9% ----- ----- ----- ----- NET INCOME 7.3% 4.5% 6.6% 0.5% 0.5% 0.3% 6.0% Trade names and goodwill amortization and other 0.7% 0.8% 0.8% 0.8% ----- ----- ----- ----- OPERATING INCOME 14.4% 4.8% 12.3% 1.6% ----- ----- ----- ----- Nonoperating expenses: Interest expense 2.0% 1.8% 1.9% 1.7% Other, net 0.2% (0.1)% 0.2% 0.1% ----- ----- ----- ----- Net nonoperating expenses 2.2% 1.7% 2.1% 1.8% ----- ----- ----- ----- INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAXES 12.2% 3.1% 10.2% (0.2)% Income taxes 4.7% 1.2% 3.9% 1.4% ----- ----- ----- ----- NET INCOME (LOSS) 7.5% 1.9% 6.3% (1.6)% ===== ===== ===== ===== See notes to consolidated financial statements.
1314 Three Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2000 Vs. Three Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 1999 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Net sales for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2000 ("secondthird quarter") were $1,711.6$1,686.7 million, representing an increase of $114.3$77.2 million or 7.2%4.8% from $1,597.3$1,609.5 million in the comparable quarter of 1999. The increase in net sales is primarily due to contributions from Reynolds (acquired in October 1999), McKechnie (acquired in October 1999), Ceanothe (acquired in December 1999), Mersch (acquired in January 2000), Brio (acquired in May 2000) and internal sales growth of 3.8%1.9%. The Company defines internal growth as growth from the core businesses, which include continuing businesses owned more than two years and minor acquisitions. Sales by business segment for the secondthird quarter were as follows, in millions:
Percentage Increase/ 2000 1999 Decrease ---- ---- ---------- Plastic Storage & Organization $ 443.3 $ 444.8 (0.3)% Food Preparation, Cooking & Serving 161.6 158.6 1.9% Infant/Juvenile Care & Play 222.7 193.0 15.4%(1) Home Decor 332.2 320.0 3.8% Hardware & Tools 184.4 148.2 24.4%(2) Office Products 367.4 332.7 10.4%(3) -------- ------- Total $1,711.6 $1,597.3 7.2%Percentage Increase/ 2000 1999 Decrease ---- ---- -------- Plastic Storage & Organization $ 433.2 $ 435.9 (0.6)% Food Preparation, Cooking & Serving 197.6 194.4 1.6% Infant/Juvenile Care & Play 221.5 194.4 13.9% (1) Home Decor 326.4 327.8 (0.4)% Hardware & Tools 181.1 147.7 22.6% (2) Office Products 326.9 309.3 5.7% (3) -------- -------- Total $1,686.7 $1,609.5 4.8% ======== ======== (1) Internal growth. (2) 8% Internal growth. (2) 7.8% internal growth plus sales from the McKechnie acquisition. (3) 3.7% internal growth plus sales from the recent McKechnie acquisition. (3) 7% Internal growth plus sales from the recent Reynolds acquisition.
Gross income as a percentage of net sales in the secondthird quarter of 2000 was 28.5%27.8% or $487.5$468.8 million versus 26.3%27.6% or $420.8$444.6 million in the comparable quarter of 1999. Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") in the third quarter of 2000 were 12.7% of net sales or $214.5 million versus 16.6% or $267.5 million in the comparable quarter of 1999. Excluding charges of $3.1 million relating to recent acquisitions, gross income in the second quarter of 2000 was $490.6 million or 28.7% of net sales. Excluding charges of $38.4 million relating to the Rubbermaid merger, gross income in the second quarter of 1999 was $459.2 million, or 28.7% of per sales. Gross margins improved as a result of integration cost savings at Rubbermaid Home Products, Rubbermaid Europe, and Little Tikes, this was offset by increased raw material costs. SG&A in the second quarter of 2000 were 12.9% of net sales or $221.6 million versus 20.2% or $322.5 million in the comparable quarter of 1999. Excluding charges of $5.9$47.2 million relating to recent acquisitions, SG&A expenses were $215.7 million or 12.6% of net sales for the second quarter of 2000. Excluding charges of $89.0 million relating to the Rubbermaid merger, SG&A in the secondthird quarter of 1999 were 233.5was $220.3 million or 14.6%13.7% of net sales. Excluding charges, SG&A declined as a result of 14 integration 15 cost savings at Rubbermaid Home Products, Rubbermaid Europe, Little Tikes, Panex and Rotring, and tight spending control throughout the rest of the Company's core businesses. In the secondthird quarter of 2000, the Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $7.7$4.2 million ($4.82.6 million after taxes). The pre-tax charge included $3.2$1.5 million of facility exit costs, $3.4$1.4 million of severance costs and $1.1$1.3 million of costs to exit contractual commitments and discontinueddiscontinue product lines primarily related to the Rubbermaid acquisition. In the secondthird quarter of 1999, the Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $8.7$14.5 million ($5.38.9 million after taxes). The pre-tax charge related to the Rubbermaid acquisition, and included $3.5$1.3 million of merger costs, executive severance costs of $1.8$4.5 million and $3.4$8.7 million of exit costs primarily related to impaired Rubbermaid capitalized computer software costs and facility exit costs. Trade names and goodwill amortization and other in the secondthird quarter of 2000 were 0.7%0.8% of net sales or $12.5$13.4 million versus 0.8% or $12.6$12.7 million in the comparable quarter of 1999. Operating income in the secondthird quarter of 2000 was 14.4%14.0% of net sales or $245.6$236.6 million versus operating income of 4.8%9.3% or $77.0$149.9 million in the comparable quarter of 1999. Excluding restructuring costs and other charges in 1999 and 2000, operating income in the secondthird quarter of 2000 was 15.3%14.3% or $262.4$240.9 million versus 13.3%14.6% or $213.0$234.8 million in the secondthird quarter of 1999. The increase in operating marginsincome was primarily due to $39.3 million of cost savings and synergies achieved as a result of the Rubbermaid merger. These gains were partially offset by $34.6 million of increased raw materials costs. Net nonoperating expenses in the third quarter of 2000 were 2.1% of net sales or $36.6 million versus net nonoperating income of 1.9% or $30.6 million in the comparable quarter of 1999. The increase in net non-operating expenses is primarily due to $7.2 million of increased interest expense as a result of higher debt levels and interest rates. The effective tax rate was 38.5% in the third quarter of 2000 versus 39.0% in the third quarter of 1999. Net income for the third quarter of 2000 was $123.0 million, compared to net income of $72.7 million in the third quarter of 1999. Diluted earnings per share were $0.46 in the third quarter of 2000 compared to $0.26 in the third quarter of 1999. Excluding 2000 restructuring costs of $4.2 million ($2.6 million after taxes), 1999 restructuring costs of $14.5 million ($8.9 million after taxes), and other 1999 pre-tax charges of $70.4 million ($42.9 million after taxes), net income increased $1.0 million or 0.8% to $125.6 million in the third quarter of 2000 from $124.5 million in 1999. Diluted earnings 16 per share, calculated on the same basis, increased 6.8% to $0.47 in the third quarter of 2000 from $0.44 in the third quarter of 1999. The increase in net income was primarily due to Rubbermaid integration cost savings at Rubbermaid Home Products, Rubbermaid Europe, and Little Tikes, tight spending control at our core businesses and internal sales growth.savings. These gains were partially offset by increased raw materials costs. Net nonoperating expensesThe increase in the second quarter of 2000 were 2.2% of net sales or $37.5 million versus net nonoperating income of 1.7% of net sales or $27.7 million in the comparable quarter of 1999. Not nonoperating expenses increased from the prior year due to higher interest expenses as a result of the Company's increased level of debt. Excluding restructuring costs and other charges in 2000 and 1999, the effective tax rate was 38.5% in the second quarter of 2000 versus 39.0% in the second quarter of 1999. Net income for the second quarter of 2000 was $128.0 million, compared to net income of $30.1 million in the second quarter of 1999. Diluted earningsearings per share were $0.48 in the second quarter of 2000 compared to $0.11 in the second quarter of 1999. Excluding 2000 restructuring costs of $7.7 million ($4.8 million after taxes), other 2000 pre-tax charges of $9.0 million ($5.5 million after taxes), 1999 restructuring costs of $8.7 million ($5.3 million after taxes), and 15 other 1999 pre-tax charges of $127.4 million ($77.7 million after taxes), net income increased $25.2 million or 22.3% to $138.3 million in the second quarter of 2000 from $113.1 million in 1999. Diluted earnings per share, calculated on the same basis, increased 30.0% to $0.52 in the second quarter of 2000 from $0.40 in the second quarter of 1999. The increases net income and earnings per share werewas primarily due to Rubbermaid integration cost savings at Rubbermaid Home Products, Rubbermaid Europe, and Little Tikes, tight spending control at our core businesses and internal sales growth. These gains werethe impact of the stock repurchase, partially offsetoffet by increased raw materials costs. SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2000 Vs. SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 1999 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Net sales for the first sixnine months of 2000 were $3,262.4$4,949.1 million, representing an increase of $148.9$226.1 million or 4.8% from $3,113.5$4,723.0 million in the comparable period of 1999. The increase in net sales was primarily attributable to contributions from Reynolds (acquired in October 1999), McKechnie (acquired in October 1999), Ceanothe (acquired in December 1999), Mersch (acquired in January 2000), Brio (acquired May 2000) and 1.5%1.6% internal growth. Net sales growth. Segment resultsfor each of the Company's segments (and the primary reasons for the six months ended June 30, 2000increase or decrease were as follows in millions: Percentage Increase/ 2000 1999 Decrease ---- ---- ------------------ Plastic Storage & Organization $ 853.4 $ 892.0 (4.3)$1,286.6 $1,327.9 (3.1) % Food Preparation, Cooking & Serving 334.6 331.6 0.9%532.2 526.0 (1.1) % Infant/Juvenile Care & Play 453.7 414.9 9.4%675.2 609.3 10.8 (1)% Home Decor 645.7 613.8 5.2%972.1 941.6 3.2 % Hardware & Tools 353.9 285.0 24.2%535.0 432.7 23.6 (2)% Office Products 621.1 576.2 7.8%948.0 885.5 7.1 (3)% -------- -------- ----------- Total $3,262.4 $3,113.5$4,949.1 $4,723.0 4.8% ======== ======== (1) Internal growth. (2) 6% Internal6.6% internal growth plus sales from the recent McKechnie acquisition. (3) 6% Internal5.2% internal growth plus sales from the recent Reynolds acquisition. Gross income as a percentage of net sales in the first sixnine months of 2000 was 27.5%27.6% or $896.0$1,364.7 million versus 27.1%27.3% or $844.1$1,288.7 million in the comparable period of 1999. Excluding charges of $3.1 million relating to recent acquisitions, gross income in the first six17 nine months of 2000 was $899.1$1,367.8 million or 27.6% of net sales. Excluding 1999 charges of $38.4$61.6 million relating to the Rubbermaid merger, gross 16 income for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1999 was $882.5$1,350.3 million or 28.3%28.6% of net sales. Gross margins improvedThe increase in gross income was primarily due to integrationinternal growth and cost savings at Rubbermaid Home Products, Rubbermaid Europe, and Little Tikes. This was more thanrelated to recent acquisitions, offset by increased raw materialmaterials costs. Selling, general and administrative expenses ("SG&A") in the first sixnine months of 2000 were 14.1%13.7% of net sales or $461.2$675.7 million versus 18.7%18.0% or $582.5$850.0 million in the comparable period of 1999. Excluding charges of $5.9 million relating to recent acquisitions, SG&A in the first sixnine months of 2000 was $455.3$669.8 million or 14.0%13.5% of net sales. Excluding 1999 charges of $89.0$136.2 million relating to the Rubbermaid merger, SG&A for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1999 were $493.5$713.8 million or 15.9%15.1% of net sales. SG&A declined as a result of integration cost savings at Rubbermaid Home Products, Rubbermaid Europe, Little Tikes, Panex and Rotring, and tight spending control throughout the rest of the Company's core businesses. In the first sixnine months of 2000, the Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $8.5$12.8 million ($5.27.9 million after taxes). The 2000 restructuringpre-tax charge primarily included severance and$5.6 million of facility exit costs, associated with$4.8 million of severance costs and $2.4 million of costs to exit contractual commitments and discontinue product lines primarily related to the Rubbermaid acquisition. In the first sixnine months of 1999, the Company recorded a pre-tax restructuring charge of $186.7$201.2 million ($159.3168.1 million after taxes). The pre-tax charge related to the Rubbermaid acquisition, and included $36.8$38.2 million of merger costs (investment banking, legal and accounting fees), executive severance costs of $85.1$89.4 million and $64.8$73.6 million of exit costs primarily related to impaired Rubbermaid capitalized computer software costs and facility exit costs. Trade names and goodwill amortization and other in the first sixnine months of 2000 were 0.8% of net sales or $25.7$39.1 million versus 0.8% or $24.7$37.4. million in the first sixnine months of 1999. Operating income in the first sixnine months of 2000 was 12.3%12.9% of net sales or $400.5$637.1 million versus 1.6%4.2% or $50.2$200.1 million in the comparable period of 1999. Excluding restructuring costs and other charges in 1999 and 2000, operating income in the first sixnine months of 2000 was 12.8%13.3% or $418.0$658.9 million versus 11.7%12.7% or $364.3$599.1 million in the first sixnine months of 1999. The increase in operating margins excluding charges was primarily due to integration$123.1 million of cost savings atand synergies achieved as a result of the Rubbermaid Home Products, Rubbermaid Europe, and Little Tikes, tight spending control at our core businessesmerger during the nine months ended September 30, 2000 and internal sales growth. These gainssavings were partially offset by increased raw materials costs.costs of $97.6 million. Net nonoperating expenses in the first sixnine months of 2000 were 2.1% of net sales or $68.4$105.0 million versus net nonoperating income of 1.8% of net sales or $56.0$86.6 million in the comparable period of 1999. Net nonoperating expenses 18 increased from the prior year due to $19.3 million higher interest expense as a result of the Company's increased level of debt. 17debt and higher interest rates. Excluding restructuring costs and other gains and charges in 2000 and 1999, the effective tax rate was 38.5% in the first sixnine months of 2000 versus 39.0% in the first sixnine months of 1999. The netNet income for the first sixnine months of 2000 was $204.2$327.2 million, compared to a net loss of $48.9$23.8 million in the first sixnine months of 1999. Diluted earnings (loss) per share were $0.76$1.22 in the first sixnine months of 2000 compared to $(0.17)$0.08 in the first sixnine months of 1999. Excluding 2000 restructuring costs of $8.5$12.8 million ($5.27.9 million after taxes), other 2000 pre-tax charges of $9.0 million ($5.5 million after taxes), 1999 restructuring costs of $186.7$201.2 million ($159.3168.1 million after taxes), and other 1999 pre-tax charges of $127.4$197.8 million ($77.7120.7 million after taxes), net income increased $26.9$28.0 million or 14.3%8.9% to $215.0$340.6 million the first sixnine months of 2000 versus $188.1$312.6 million in 1999. Diluted earnings per share, calculated on the same basis, increased 19.4%14.4% to $0.80$1.27 in the first sixnine months of 2000 versus $0.67$1.11 in the first sixnine months of 1999. The increasesincrease in net income and earnings per share werefor the nine months ended September 30, 2000 was primarily due to Rubbermaid integration cost savings, at Rubbermaid Home Products, Rubbermaid Europe, and Little Tikes, tight spending control at our core businesses and internal sales growth. These gains were partially offset by increased raw materials costs. The increase in earnings per share was primarily due to Rubbermaid integration cost savings, tight spending control, internal growth and the impact of the stock repurchase, partially offset by increased raw materials costs. Liquidity and Capital Resources ----------------------------------------------------------- Sources: The Company's primary sources of liquidity and capital resources include cash provided from operations and use of available borrowing facilities. Cash provided from operating activities in the first sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2000 was $103.3$284.8 million compared to $24.1$ 288.3 million for the comparable period of 1999. The decrease in operating cash flows is primarily a result of increased inventory levels partially offset by the increase in net cash provided from operating activities in 2000 versus 1999 is primarily due to the year over year improved operating results.income. The Company has short-term foreign and domestic uncommitted lines of credit with various banks which are available for short-term financing. Borrowings under the Company's uncommitted lines of credit are subject to discretion of the Lender. The Company's uncommitted lines of credit do not have a material impact on the Company's liquidity. Borrowings under the Company's uncommitted lines of credit at JuneSeptember 30, 2000 totaled $72.0$19.5 million. During 1997, the Company amended its revolving credit agreement to increase the aggregate borrowing limit to $1.3 billion, at a 19 floating interest rate. The revolving credit agreement will terminate in August 2002. At JuneSeptember 30, 2000, there were no borrowings under the revolving credit agreement. 18 In lieu of borrowings under the Company's revolving credit agreement, the Company may issue up to $1.3 billion of commercial paper. The Company's revolving credit agreement provides the committed backup liquidity required to issue commercial paper. Accordingly, commercial paper may only be issued up to the amount available for borrowing under the Company's revolving credit agreement. At JuneSeptember 30, 2000, $993.0$1,050.0 million (principal amount) of commercial paper was outstanding. The entire amount is classified as long-term debt. On March 24, 2000, the Company issued $300.0 million (principal amount) of 3-Year Medium Term Notes pursuant to its universal shelf program. The securities mature on March 24, 2003, and bear a 3-month floating interest rate based on 3-month LIBOR +22 basis points. The initial interest rate was 6.5%. Proceeds were used to pay down commercial paper. Including this financing, the Company had outstanding at JuneSeptember 30, 2000, a total of $1,159.5$1,109.5 million (principal amount) of Medium Term Notes. The maturities on these notes range from 3 to 30 years at an average interest rate of 6.3%6.45%. A universal shelf registration statement became effective in July 1999. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2000, $449.5 million of Company debt and equity securities may be issued under the shelf. Uses: The Company's primary uses of liquidity and capital resources include acquisitions, dividend payments and capital expenditures. Cash used in acquiring businesses was $68.1$70.8 million and $35.3$34.9 million in the first sixnine months of 2000 and 1999, respectively. In the first sixnine months of 2000, the Company acquired Mersch and Brio and made other minor acquisitions for cash purchase prices totaling $47.3$50.8 million. In the first sixnine months of 1999, the Company acquired Ateliers 28 for a cash purchase price of $40.3 million. All of these acquisitions were accounted for as purchases and were paid for with proceeds obtained from the issuance of commercial paper. Cash used for restructuring activities was $7.6$15.4 million and $121.7$127.6 million in the first sixnine months of 2000 and 1999, respectively. Such cash payments represent primarily employee termination benefits and other merger expenses. Capital expenditures were $159.1$240.5 million and $89.0$139.7 million in the first sixnine months of 2000 and 1999, respectively. The increase in capital expenditures is primarily a result of increased capital spending at those divisions acquired as part of the Rubbermaid merger. 20 Aggregate dividends paid during the first sixnine months of 2000 and 1999 were $113.1$169.1 million ($0.420.63 per share) and $113.0$169.4 million ($0.400.60 per share), respectively. 19 During the first sixnine months of 2000, the Company repurchased 15.5 million shares of its common stock at an average price of $26 per share, for a total cash price of $403.0 million.million under the company's stock repurchase program. As of September 30, 2000, the company can use up to an additional $97 million to repurchase shares under the plan. Retained earnings increased in the first sixnine months of 2000 by $91.0$158.0 million. Retained earnings decreased in the first sixnine months of 1999 by $161.9$145.6 million. The difference between 1999 and 2000 was primarily due to improved operating results in 2000 versus 1999 and 1999 restructuring costs in 1999 of $186.7$201.2 million ($159.3168.1 million after taxes) and other pre-tax charges of $127.4$197.8 million ($77.7120.7 million after taxes). Working capital at JuneSeptember 30, 2000 was $1,316.2$1,414.1 million compared to $1,108.7 million at December 31, 1999. The current ratio at JuneSeptember 30, 2000 was 1.86:1.98:1 compared to 1.68:1 at December 31, 1999. Total debt to total capitalization (total debt is net of cash and cash equivalents, and total capitalization includes total debt, convertible preferred securities and stockholders equity) was .44:.43:1 at JuneSeptember 30, 2000 and .33:1 at December 31, 1999. The Company believes that cash provided from operations and available borrowing facilities will continue to provide adequate support for the cash needs of existing businesses; however, certain events, such as significant acquisitions, could require additional external financing. Market Risk ----------- The Company's market risk is impacted by changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, and certain commodity prices. Pursuant to the Company's policies, natural hedging techniques and derivative financial instruments may be utilized to reduce the impact of adverse changes in market prices. The Company does not hold or issue derivative instruments for trading purposes, and has no material sensitivity to changes in market rates and prices on its derivative financial instrument positions. The Company's primary market risk is interest rate exposure, primarily in the United States. The Company manages interest rate exposure through its conservative debt ratio target and its mix of fixed and floating rate debt. Interest rate exposure was reduced significantly in 1997 from the issuance of $500 million 5.25% Company-Obligated Mandatorily Redeemable Convertible Preferred Securities of a Subsidiary Trust, the proceeds of which reduced commercial paper. Interest rate swaps may be used to adjust interest rate exposures when appropriate based on market conditions, and, for 21 qualifying hedges, the interest differential of swaps is included in interest expense. The Company's foreign exchange risk management policy emphasizes hedging anticipated intercompany and third-party commercial 20 transaction exposures of one year duration or less. The Company focuses on natural hedging techniques of the following form: 1) offsetting or netting of like foreign currency flows, 2) structuring foreign subsidiary balance sheets with appropriate levels of debt to reduce subsidiary net investments and subsidiary cash flows subject to conversion risk, 3) converting excess foreign currency deposits into U.S. dollars or the relevant functional currency and 4) avoidance of risk by denominating contracts in the appropriate functional currency. In addition, the Company utilizes forward contracts and purchased options to hedge commercial and intercompany transactions. Gains and losses related to qualifying hedges of commercial transactions are deferred and included in the basis of the underlying transactions. Derivatives used to hedge intercompany transactions are marked to market with the corresponding gains or losses included in the consolidated statements of income. Due to the diversity of its product lines, the Company does not have material sensitivity to any one commodity. The Company manages commodity price exposures primarily through the duration and terms of its vendor contracts. The amounts shown below represent the estimated potential economic loss that the Company could incur from adverse changes in either interest rates or foreign exchange rates using the value-at-risk estimation model. The value-at-risk model uses historical foreign exchange rates and interest rates to estimate the volatility and correlation of these rates in future periods. It estimates a loss in fair market value using statistical modeling techniques and including substantially all market risk exposures (specifically excluding equity-method investments). The fair value losses shown in the table below have no impact on results of operations or financial condition as they represent economic not financial losses. JuneSeptember 30, Time Confidence 2000 Period Level --------------------- ------ ------------------- (In millions) Interest rates $6.3$4.7 1 day 95% Foreign exchange $4.4$4.5 1 day 95% The 95% confidence interval signifies the Company's degree of confidence that actual losses would not exceed the estimated losses shown above. The amounts shown here disregard the possibility that 22 interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates could move in the Company's favor. The value-at-risk model assumes that all movements in these rates will be adverse. Actual experience has shown that gains and losses tend to offset each other over time, and it is highly 21 unlikely that the Company could experience losses such as these over an extended period of time. These amounts should not be considered projections of future losses, since actual results may differ significantly depending upon activity in the global financial markets. EURO CURRENCY CONVERSION On January 1, 1999, the "Euro" became the common legal currency for 11 of the 15 member countries of the European Union. On that date, the participating countries fixed conversion rates between their existing sovereign currencies ("legacy currencies") and the Euro. On January 4, 1999, the Euro began trading on currency exchanges and became available for non-cash transactions, if the parties elect to use it. The legacy currencies will remain legal tender through December 31, 2001. Beginning January 1, 2002, participating countries will introduce Euro-denominated bills and coins, and effective July 1, 2002, legacy currencies will no longer be legal tender. After the dual currency phase, all businesses in participating countries must conduct all transactions in the Euro and must convert their financial records and reports to be Euro-based. The Company has commenced an internal analysis of the Euro conversion process to prepare its information technology systems for the conversion and analyze related risks and issues, such as the benefit of the decreased exchange rate risk in cross-border transactions involving participating countries and the impact of increased price transparency on cross-border competition in these countries. The Company believes that the Euro conversion process will not have a material impact on the Company's businesses or financial condition on a consolidated basis. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS Forward-looking statements in this Report are made in reliance upon the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements may relate to, but are not limited to, such matters as sales, income, earnings per share, return on equity, capital expenditures, dividends, capital structure, free cash flow, debt to capitalization ratios, interest rates, internal growth rates, Euro conversion plans and related risks, pending legal proceeding and claims (including environmental matters), future economic performance, operating income improvements, synergies, management's plans, goals and objectives for future operations and growth or the assumptions relating to any of the forward-looking information. The Company cautions that forward-looking statements are not guarantees since there are inherent difficulties in predicting future results, and that actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited 22 to, those matters set forth in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, the documents incorporated by reference therein and in Exhibit 99 in thereto. 23 PART I. Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled "Market Risk" in the Company's Management's Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition (Part I, Item 2). PART II. OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings The Company is subject to certain legal proceedings and claims, including the environmental matters described below, that have arisen in the ordinary conduct of its business or have been assumed by the Company when it purchased certain businesses. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2000, the Company was involved in various matters concerning federal and state environmental laws and regulations, including matters in which the Company has been identified by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and certain state environmental agencies as a potentially responsible party ("PRP") at contaminated sites under the Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA") and equivalent state laws. In assessing its environmental response costs, the Company has considered several factors, including: the extent of the Company's volumetric contribution at each site relative to that of other PRPs; the kind of waste; the terms of existing cost sharing and other applicable agreements; the financial ability of other PRPs to share in the payment of requisite costs; the Company's prior experience with similar sites; environmental studies and cost estimates available to the Company; the effects of inflation on cost estimates; and the extent to which the Company's and other parties' status as PRPs is disputed. Based on information available to it, the Company's estimate of environmental response costs associated with these matters as of JuneSeptember 30, 2000 ranged between $16.0$18.0 million and $21.0$26.0 million. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2000, the Company had a reserve equal to $19.7$25 million for such environmental response costs in the aggregate. No insurance recovery was taken into account in determining the Company's cost estimates or reserve, nor do the Company's cost estimates or reserve reflect any discounting for present value purposes. 23purposes, except with respect to two long term (30 years) operation and maintenance CERCLA matters which are estimated at present value. 24 Because of the uncertainties associated with environmental investigations and response activities, the possibility that the Company could be identified as a PRP at sites identified in the future that require the incurrence of environmental response costs and the possibility of additional sites as a result of businesses acquired, actual costs to be incurred by the Company may vary from the Company's estimates. Subject to difficulties in estimating future environmental response costs, the Company does not expect that any amount it may have to pay in connection with environmental matters in excess of amounts reserved will have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial statements. The Company is involved in a legal proceeding relating to the importation and distribution of vinyl mini-blinds made with plastic containing lead stabilizers. In 1996, the Consumer Product Safety Commission found that such stabilizers deteriorate over time from exposure to sunlight and heat, causing lead dust to form on mini-blind surfaces and presenting a health risk to children under six years of age. In December 1998, 13 companies, including a subsidiary of the Company, were named as defendants in a case involving the importation and distribution of vinyl mini-blinds containing lead. The case, filed as a Massachusetts class action in the Superior Court, alleges misrepresentation, breaches of express and implied warranties, negligence, loss of consortium and violation of Massachusetts consumer protection laws. The plaintiffs seek injunctive relief, unspecified damages, compensatory damages for personal injury and court costs. As of June 30, 2000, eightEight complaints were filed against the Company and certain of its officers and directors in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on behalf of a purported class consisting of persons who purchased common stock of the Company, Newell Co. or Rubbermaid Incorporated during the period from October 21, 1998 through September 3, 1999 or exchanged shares of Rubbermaid common stock for the Company's common stock as part of the Newell Rubbermaid merger. The complaints allegealleged that during the relevant time period the defendants violated Sections 10(b), 14(a) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act as a result of, among other allegations,federal securities laws by issuing false and misleading statements concerning the Company's financial condition and results of operations. The eight cases were consolidated before a single judge in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division.that court. The court appointed lead plaintiffs for the uncertified class and approved counsel for the lead plaintiffs. On May 12, 2000, plaintiffsPlaintiffs then filed a consolidated amended complaint that assertsConsolidated Amended Class Action Complaint consisting of six counts asserting claims under Sections 11, 12,12(a)(2) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Sections 10(b) and 2020(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Defendantsin which they alleged, among other things, that the Company and Rubbermaid Incorporated made materially false and misleading statements in documents filed with the SEC, including the registration statement filed by the Company in connection with the merger with Rubbermaid. All defendants moved to dismiss that amended complaint. On October 2, 2000 the court issued a Memorandum Opinion and Order dismissing the amended complaint for failure to state a 25 claim upon which relief may be granted and on October 3, 2000 the court entered a judgment dismissing the complaint. Plaintiffs have moved to dismiss each countreconsider two aspects of the consolidated amended complaint. Thatcourt's ruling. The court is scheduled to rule on that motion is fully briefed and awaiting decision.on November 15, 2000. The Company believes that these claims are without merit and intends to continue to vigorously defend these lawsuits. Although management of the Company cannot predict the ultimate outcome of these matters with certainty, it believes that their 24 ultimate resolution, including any amounts it may have to pay in excess of amounts reserved, will not have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of the Security-Holders On May 10, 2000, the 2000 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company was held. The following is a brief description of the matters voted upon at the meeting and tabulation of the voting therefor: Proposal 1. Election of a Board of Directors to hold office for a term of three years. Number of Shares -------------------------- Nominee For Withheld ------- --- -------- Robert L. Katz 223,553,808 9,841,214 John J. McDonough 210,503,557 22,891,465 William P. Sovey 226,941,093 6,453,929 Proposal 2. Ratification of Appointment of Independent Accountants. A proposal to ratify the appointment of Arthur Andersen LLP as independent accountants to audit the consolidated balance sheet and related consolidated statements of income, stockholder's equity and comprehensive income and cash flows of the Company for 2000 was adopted, with 231,835,267 votes cast for, 861,655 votes cast against, 698,100 votes abstained and 0 broker non-votes. Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K (a) Exhibits: 3.2 Amendment to By-Laws and Amended By-laws of Newell Rubbermaid Inc., as amended through November 13, 2000. 12. Statement of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges 27. Financial Data Schedule (b) Reports on Form 8-K: None. 2526 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. NEWELL RUBBERMAID INC. Registrant Date: August 11,November 14, 2000 /s/ Dale L. Matschullat ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dale L. Matschullat Vice President - Finance Date: August 11,November 14, 2000 /s/ Brett E. Gries ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Brett E. Gries Vice President - Accounting & Audit