SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, DC 20549

                                   FORM 10-Q

               QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
                    OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                      For the quarter ended June 28, 199827, 1999


                        Commission file number 0-21294

                               Aseco Corporation
            (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


            Delaware                                    04-2816806
   (State or other jurisdiction of          (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
    incorporation or organization)


           500 Donald Lynch Boulevard, Marlboro, Massachusetts 01752
                   (Address of principal executive offices)


                                (508)481-8896
             (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

                               Yes   X   No _____
                                   -----

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of
common stock, as of June 28, 1998.27, 1999.


                Common Stock, $.01 par value           3,731,7183,850,658
                   (Title of each class)            (Number of shares)


                                       -1-1


                               ASECO CORPORATION

                               TABLE OF CONTENTS

                                                                  Page
                                                                  ----

PART I.   FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.   Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

          Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)
          at June 28, 199827, 1999 and March 29, 199828, 1999                       3

          Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
          (unaudited) for the three months ended June 28,
          199827, 1999
          and June 29, 199728, 1998                                         4


          Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
          (unaudited) for the three months ended June 28,
          199827, 1999
          and June 29, 199728, 1999                                         5


          Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements      6-76-8

Item 2.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
          Condition and Results of Operations                       8-109-13

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.   Legal Proceedings                                         1114

Item 2.   Changes in Securities 11and Use of Proceeds                 14

Item 3.   Defaults upon Senior Securities                           1114

Item 4.   Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders       1114

Item 5.   Other Information                                         1114

Item 6.   Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K                          11-1214


          Signatures                                                13
                         -2-15

                                       2


PART I.        FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.  Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

                               ASECO CORPORATION
                     CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
                                  (unaudited)

June 27, March 28, (in thousands, except share and per share data) 1999 1999 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ASSETS Current Assets Cash and cash equivalents $ 379 $ 1,229 Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $1,016 at June 27, 1999 and $1,027 at March 28, 1999 5,355 4,041 Inventories, net 5,531 5,893 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 1,964 1,918 ----------------- ----------------- Total current assets 13,229 13,081 Plant and equipment, at cost 7,348 7,341 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 5,437 5,207 ----------------- ----------------- 1,911 2,134 Other assets, net 115 109 $15,255 $15,324 ================= ================= LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Current liabilities Line of credit $ 575 $ 475 Accounts payable 2,545 1,964 Accrued expenses 2,661 2,868 Current portion of capital lease obligations 8 12 ----------------- ----------------- Total current liabilities 5,789 5,319 Stockholders' equity Preferred stock, $.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding --- --- Common stock, $.01 par value: Authorized 15,000,000 shares, issued and outstanding 3,850,658 and 3,832,799 shares at June 27, 1999 and March 28, 1999, respectively 39 38 Additional paid in capital 18,332 18,321 Accumulated deficit (8,933) (8,382) Foreign currency translation adjustment 28 28 ----------------- ----------------- Total stockholders' equity 9,466 10,005 ----------------- ----------------- $15,255 $15,324 ================= =================
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements 3 ASECO CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited) (in thousands, except share and per Three months ended share data) June 28, 1998 June 29,1997 Net sales $ 6,630 $ 8,865 Cost of sales 4,060 4,820 ------ ------ Gross profit 2,570 4,045 Research and development costs 1,661 1,356 Selling, general and administrative expenses 2,384 2,473 Acquired in-process research and development costs -- 4,900 ------ ------ Loss from operations (1,475) (4,684) Other income (expense): Interest income 27 169 Interest expense (5) (6) Other, net (9) -- ------ ------ 13 163 ------ ------ Loss before income taxes (1,462) (4,521) Income tax (benefit) expense (343) 219 ------ ------ Net loss $ (1,119) $ (4,740) ======== ========= Loss per share, diluted ($ .30) ($ 1.29) ======== ==========
Three months ended June 27, June 28, 1999 1998 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Net sales $ 4,717 $ 6,630 Cost of sales 2,813 4,060 ----------------- ----------------- Gross profit 1,904 2,570 Research and development costs 856 1,661 Selling, general and administrative expense 1,614 2,384 ----------------- ----------------- Loss from operations (566) (1,475) Other income (expense), net 15 13 ----------------- ----------------- Loss before income taxes (551) (1,462) Income tax benefit --- (343) ----------------- ----------------- Net loss ($ 551) ($1,119) ================= ================= Loss per share ($ 0.14) ($ 0.30) ================= ================= Shares used to compute loss per share 3,841,000 3,732,000 3,667,000 diluted
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements -4-4 ASECO CORPORATION CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited) Three months ended (in thousands) June 28, June 29, 1998 1997 Operating activities: Net loss $ (1,119) $ (4,740) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by/used in operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 508 269 Acquired in-process research and development -- 4,900 Loss on sale of plant and equipment 5 -- Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable 1,848 64 Inventories, net (1,318) (1,990) Prepaid expenses and other current assets (304) (327) Accounts payable and accrued expenses (2,586) 2,255 ------- ------ Total adjustments (1,847) 5,171 ------ ------ Cash provided by/used in operating activities (2,966) 431 Investing activities: Acquisitions net of cash acquired -- (6,079) Proceeds from sale of plant and equipment 7 --- Acquisition of plant and equipment (218) (457) Increase in software development costs and other assets (86) (50) ------ ------ Cash used in investing activities (297) (6,586) Financing activities: Net proceeds from issuance of common stock -- 3 Borrowings/(payments) on working capital line of credit 300 (395) Payments of long-term capital lease obligations (14) (4) ------ ------ Cash provided by/used in financing activities 286 (396) Effect of exchange rate changes on cash (3) 1 ------ ------ Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (2,980) (6,550) Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period 4,431 14,082 ------ ------ Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period $ 1,451 $ 7,532 ======= =======
Three months ended ------------------------------------------------ June 27, June 28, 1999 1998 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Operating activities: Net loss $ (551) $(1,119) Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 254 508 Loss on sale of plant and equipment -- 5 Changes in assets and liabilities: Accounts receivable (1,314) 1,848 Inventories, net 362 (1,318) Prepaid expenses and other current assets (46) (304) Accounts payable and accrued expenses 374 (2,586) -------------------- --------------------- Total adjustments (370) (1,847) -------------------- --------------------- Cash used in operating activities (921) (2,966) Investing activities: Proceeds from sale of plant and equipment -- 7 Acquisition of plant and equipment (7) (218) Increase in software development costs and other assets (30) (86) -------------------- --------------------- Cash used in investing activities (37) (297) Financing activities: Net proceeds from issuance of common stock 12 -- Borrowings on line of credit 100 300 Payments of long-term capital lease obligations (4) (14) -------------------- --------------------- Cash provided by financing activities 108 286 -------------------- --------------------- Effect of exchange rate changes on cash -- (3) Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (850) (2,980) Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of period 1,229 4,431 -------------------- --------------------- Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period $ 379 $ 1,451 ==================== =====================
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements -5-5 ASECO CORPORATION NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 28, 199827, 1999 1. Basis of Presentation -- The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-monththree month period ended June 28, 199827, 1999 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended March 28, 1999.26, 2000. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended March 29, 1998.28, 1999. 2. In 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issuedComprehensive Income -- Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 128, "Earnings per Share" which the Company adopted in the third quarter of fiscal 1998. Statement 128 replaced the previously reported primary and fully diluted earnings per share with basic and diluted earnings per share. Unlike primary earnings per share, basic earnings per share excludes any dilutive effects of options, warrants, and convertible securities. Diluted earnings per share is very similar to the previously reported fully diluted earnings per share which includes the dilutive effect of options, warrants and convertible securities. All earnings per share amounts for all periods have been presented, and where necessary, restated to conform to the Statement 128 requirements. 3. In 1997, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement No. 130 "Reporting" Reporting Comprehensive Income" which establishes standards for(SFAS 130) requires the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components in a full set of general-purpose financial statements.components. Under this standard, certain revenues, expenses, gains and losses recognized during the period are included in comprehensive income, regardless of whether they are considered to be results of operations of the period. During the first quarter of 1998 and 1997,fiscal 2000, total comprehensive loss amounted to $1,130,000 and $4,752,000 respectively.$551,000 versus comprehensive loss of $1,080,000 for the first quarter of fiscal 1999. The difference between total comprehensive loss and net loss as reported on the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the period ended June 27, 1998 is attributable to the foreign currency translation adjustment. 3. New Accounting Pronouncements -- The Company has not yet adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133 "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" (SFAS 133) which is required to be adopted in fiscal 2002, as amended by Financial Accounting Standards No. 137. Adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations. 4. Inventories consisted of:- June 27, March 28, (in thousands) June 28, 1998 March 29, 19981999 1999 ------------- ----------- Raw Material $ 5,521 $ 5,612$1,713 $1,966 Work in Process 5,661 4,7123,255 3,441 Finished Goods 1,736 1,551 ------ ------ $ 12,918 $ 11,875 ======== ======== -6- 563 486 ------------- ----------- $5,531 $5,893 ============= =========== 5. On May 23, 1997,Restructuring and Other Charges -- In the second quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company acquired 100%announced a plan to consolidate its UK wafer handling and inspection operations. This plan included the closure of the outstanding stockCompany's UK facility and related transfer of Western Equipment Developments (Holdings) Ltd. ("WED")manufacturing and other operations to the United States as well as the discontinuation of several older product models in an effort to focus the operation's product offerings. In conjunction with this plan, the Company recorded a $2.2 million special charge including a $850,000 charge to cost of sales for approximately $6,100,000inventory write-downs related to product discontinuation and a $1.3 million restructuring charge. The principal components of the restructuring charge include 6 $627,000 for a write-down of fixed and other long-term assets no longer used by the operation, $241,000 for severance related charges, $325,000 for a write-down of goodwill related to the impairment of such assets indicated using estimated future cash flows, and $65,000 of lease termination and related costs. As of January 1999, the closure and transfer were substantially complete, fixed assets were disposed of and severance related costs were paid. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company recorded a special charge of $6.2 million. The charge reflected the impact of continuing unfavorable conditions in cash. WED designs, manufactures and markets integrated circuit wafer handling robot and inspection systems used to load, sort, transport and inspect wafers during the semiconductor manufacturing process. The acquisitioncapital equipment market, a more gradual recovery than was accountedpreviously anticipated and expected future technology changes in this market upon the Company's product line, cost structure and asset base. Components of the charge included 1) a $5.0 million charge to cost of goods sold for write-downs related principally of excess inventory based on revised fiscal year 2000 and beyond forecasted operating plans; 2) a $351,000 charge to research and development for the write-down of development equipment no longer used by the Company as a purchaseresult of a refocusing of development efforts to address expected technology changes and; 3) a $854,000 charge to selling, general and accordingly,administrative expense including $544,000 related to the resultswrite-down of operationsvarious assets whose net realizable value was adversely affected based on revised fiscal year 2000 and beyond forecasted operating plans, $280,000 related to costs associated with the layoff of 13 employees and $30,000 related to the closure of the acquired businessCompany's Malaysian subsidiary. As of June 1999, fixed assets deemed no longer useable were put out of service and segregated for disposal, and all severance related costs were paid. 6. Credit Facility -- On June 22, 1999 the Company entered into a loan modification agreement (the "Credit Agreement") which extends the expiration date of its revolving line of credit with a bank to November 1, 1999 (the "Line of Credit"). Borrowings under the Line of Credit were $475,000 and $575,000 at March 28, 1999 and June 27, 1999, respectively. Terms of the Credit Agreement specify that as of June 22, 1999, maximum availability under the Line of Credit was equal to the lesser of (i) $1.3 million or (ii) 80% of qualified accounts receivable (the "Borrowing Base"). Such maximum availability decreases to the lesser of (i) $350,000 or (ii) the Borrowing Base after the earlier of August 31, 1999 or receipt by the Company of a refund of federal taxes paid by the Company in respect of fiscal 1998, which refund the Company expects will be approximately $1.3 million. At June 27, 1999, the Borrowing Base was $1.3 million. The Credit Line is secured by all assets of the Company. The Credit Agreement establishing the Credit Line prohibits the payment of dividends without the bank's consent and requires the maintenance of specified debt to net worth and current ratios. The Credit Agreement also requires that the Company not incur quarterly net losses of more than a specified amount. As of June 27, 1999, the Company was in compliance with its bank covenants. The Company is currently refinancing its bank debt and has received a commitment from another lender to provide a replacement credit line to the Company. The replacement line of credit which will have been includeda two year term will allow for maximum availability of $3.0 million based on a percentage of qualifed accounts receivable and inventory. The line will be secured by all the assets of the Company and will be subject to certain financial covenants including specified levels of net worth, and debt to net worth ratios and limitations on capital expenditures. The replacement line of credit will accrue interest at a rate of prime plus 1.5%. The lender may alter or terminate its commitment with respect to the replacement line of credit if there is any material adverse change in the Company's consolidated financial statements commencing May 23, 1997. Theposition or otherwise. However, to the extent that these is a shortfall of funds under the commitment, management has the ability and intent to adjust the Company's initial allocationcash flows to be able to meet operational needs at least through the end of fiscal 2000 7 7. Repayment of Loan -- On July 6, 1999, an executive officer repaid $140,000 to the Company in settlement of the purchase price atprincipal portion of an outstanding loan. The Company agreed to forgive interest accrued on the date of acquisition resulted in an estimate of acquired in-process research and development of $4,900,000loan through July 6, 1999. 8. Taxes -- No tax benefit was recorded in the first quarter of fiscal 1998. During fiscal 1998,2000 because no benefit from operating loss carryback provisions was available to the Company. The Company recorded a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets, principally representing net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets the realization of which the Company determined that certain acquired technology wasdoes not as developed as originally expected, and certain in-process technology would requiredeem more time to developlikely than originally anticipated. At the end of fiscal 1998, the Company completed the allocation of the purchase price which resulted in an additional in-process research and development charge of $1,200,000 resulting in an aggregate fiscal 1998 charge of $6,100,000. The following table summarizes the unaudited pro-forma consolidated results of operations as if the acquisition had been made as of January 1, 1997, including the aggregate acquired in-process research and development charge of $6,100,000 as if expensed on that date: (in thousands, except per share data) Quarter ended June 29, 1997 Net sales $9,894 Net loss (7,329) Loss per share $(2.00) -7-not. 8 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Three monthsMonths ended June 27, 1999 Results of Operations-Overview ------------------------------ During fiscal 1999, the Company undertook several actions to address the impact on the Company of the industry-wide drop in demand for semiconductor capital equipment that started in the latter part of fiscal 1998. None of these actions had a financial impact in the first quarter of fiscal 1999. However, in the second quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company recorded a special charge of $2.2 million including a $850,000 charge to cost of sales for inventory write-downs related to product discontinuation and a $1.3 million restructuring charge. The principal components of the restructuring charge included $627,000 for a write- down of fixed and other long-term assets no longer used by the operation, $241,000 for severance related charges, $325,000 for a write-down of goodwill related to the impairment of such assets indicated using estimated future cash flows, and $65,000 of lease termination and related costs. As of January 1999, the closure and transfer were substantially complete, fixed assets were disposed of and severance related costs were paid. In the fourth quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company recorded a special charge of $6.2 million. The charge reflected the impact of continuing unfavorable conditions in the semiconductor capital equipment market, a more gradual recovery than was previously anticipated and expected future technology changes in this market upon the Company's product line, cost structure and asset base Components of the charge included 1) a $5.0 million charge to cost of goods sold for write-downs related principally of excess inventory based on revised fiscal year 2000 and beyond forecasted operating plans; 2) a $351,000 charge to research and development for the write-down of development equipment no longer used by the Company as a result of a refocusing of development efforts to address expected technology changes and; 3) a $854,000 charge to selling, general and administrative expense including $544,000 related to the write-down of various assets whose net realizable value was adversely affected based on revised fiscal year 2000 and beyond forecasted operating plans, $280,000 related to costs associated with the layoff of 13 employees and $30,000 related to the closure of the Company's Malaysian subsidiary. As of June 1999, fixed assets deemed no longer useable were put out of service and segregated for disposal, and all severance related costs were paid. Quarter Ended June 27, 1999 Compared to Quarter Ended June 28, 1998 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS------------------------------------------------------------------- Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal 19992000 decreased 25%29% to $6.6$4.7 million compared to $8.9from $6.6 million for the first quarter of fiscal 1998.1999. The decrease in net sales resulted from fewer unit shipments duringthe industry-wide drop in demand for semiconductors and semiconductor capital equipment. International sales represented approximately 19% of net sales in the first quarter of fiscal 19992000 compared to the first quarter of fiscal 1998 as a result of an industry wide market downturn. International sales represented approximately 32%35% of net sales in the same quarter last year as shipments to the Pacific Rim region declined. 9 Gross profit for the first quarter of fiscal 1999 versus 35%2000 was $1.9 million, or 40% of net sales, compared to $2.6 million, or 39% of net sales, in the first quarter of fiscal 1998. Approximately 83%1999. Gross profit in both quarters was significantly influenced by a product shipment mix including a larger component of all internationalthe Company's lower gross margin products and manufacturing excess capacity because of lower production levels. Despite the lower net sales were to customers locatedlevels in the Pacific Rim region. Gross margin for the first quarter of fiscal 1999 was 39%2000, the gross profit percentage increased 1% as a result of the Company's reduced manufacturing cost structure compared to 46%the same quarter last year. Research and development costs decreased 48% to $856,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2000 from $1.7 million in the same quarter last year. The decline resulted from a higher mixdecrease in spending was primarily the result of lower margin product salesworkforce reductions implemented during fiscal 1999. Development spending in the first quarter of 1999 comparedfiscal 2000 was focused on various enhancements and features for the Company's test handlers and a new test handler platform. Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased 32% to the same quarter last year and excess manufacturing capacity resulting from lower sales and production levels. Research and development expenses increased 22% to $1.7$1.6 million in the first quarter of fiscal 19992000 from $1.4$2.4 million in the first quarter of fiscal 1998. Research and development expenses also increased as a percentage of sales to 25% in the first quarter of fiscal 1999 from 15% in the first quarter of fiscal 1998 due to increased research and development spending and the decline in net sales. The increase in research and development spending resulted from the inclusion of a complete quarter of WED expenses in the first quarter fiscal 1999 results and from the Company's expenditures associated with the continued development of its newest test handler product. During the first quarter of fiscal 1998, the Company recorded a special charge to earnings of $4.9 million for acquired in-process research and development related to the initial allocation of the purchase price of the Company's acquisition of Western Equipment Developments Holdings ("WED") (See Note 5 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included herein). Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first quarter of fiscal 1999 were $2.4 million versus $2.5 million for the first quarter of fiscal 1998.1999. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily thea result of lower commissions earnedreductions in headcount during fiscal 1999 and strict controls over discretionary spending. As a result of the quarter due toabove, the lower sales level and to a higher percentageCompany generated an operating loss of sales originating from the Company's direct sales force which earn lower commission rates than independent sales representatives, along with the savings realized from$566,000 for the first quarter workforce reduction. These and other expense controls were partially offset by the inclusion of a full quarterfiscal 2000 compared to an operating loss of WED's operating results$1.5 million in the first quarter of fiscal 1999. Operating lossOther income (expense), net consists primarily of interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents and interest expense paid on the Company's outstanding line of credit balance. The Company recorded no income tax benefit in the first quarter of fiscal 1999 was $1.5 million versus an2000 because no benefits from operating loss of $4.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 1998. The operating loss in the first quarter of fiscal 1999 was the result of the decline in sales and lower gross margins attributablecarryback provisions were available to the shift in product mix. The operating loss of $4.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 1998 was the result of a special charge to earnings of $4.9 million relating to the acquired in-process research and development associated with the initial allocation of the purchase price of the acquisition of WED. -8- Company. The Company recorded a valuation allowance for deferred tax benefitassets, principally representing net operating loss carryforwards and other deferred tax assets the realization of $343,000 inwhich the first quarter of fiscal 1999 versus income tax expense of $219,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 1998. Tax rates in both quarters were affected by the inability to offset losses incurred by WED against income earned and taxes paid in previous years in the United States. As a result of the foregoing, netCompany does not deem more likely than not. Net loss for the first quarter of fiscal 19992000 was $551,000, or $.14 per share, compared to net loss of $1.1 million, or $.30 per diluted share, as compared to net loss of $4.7 million, or $1.29 per diluted share, for the first quarter of fiscal 1998. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Company ended the first quarter of fiscal 1999 with a cash position of approximately $1.5 million. Additionally, the Company had an unsecured line of credit with a bank in the amount of $5.0 million against which there were borrowings at the end of the first quarter of fiscal 1999 of approximately $300,000. During the quarter, the Company elected to utilize its working capital line of credit to cover its short-term cash needs rather than liquidate its investment holdings. The Company's line of credit is conditioned upon meeting certain financial covenants, including maintaining specified levels of quarterly and annual earnings, tangible net worth and restrictions on dividend payments. As of June 30, 1998, the Company was not in compliance with certain covenants and consequently has requested a waiver. The Company used approximately $3.0 million of cash from operations during the first quarter of fiscal 1999. Accounts receivable decreased approximately $1.9 million inLiquidity and Capital Resources ------------------------------- The Company historically has funded its operations primarily through cash flows from operations, bank borrowings and the first quarterprivate and public sale of fiscalequity securities. At June 27, 1999, because of a decrease in net sales from the fourth quarter of fiscal 1998. Inventory increased approximately $1 million during the first quarter of fiscal 1999 as the Company was not able to reduce its build plan early enough in the first quarter to facilitate the timely reschedulinghad borrowings, net of purchase commitments. Accounts payablecash on hand of $196,000 and accrued expenses decreasedworking capital of approximately $2.6 million as a result of timing of payments and lower sales volume experienced during the quarter.$7.4 million. The Company used $297,000approximately $921,000 in cash for investingoperating activities during the first quarter of fiscal 19992000. The primary working capital factors affecting cash from operations were accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable and accrued expenses. Accounts receivable increased approximately $1.3 million as a result of a sequential quarterly increase in net sales, for which the majority of equipment was shipped in the last two weeks of the quarter. Inventory decreased approximately $362,000 during the first quarter of fiscal 2000 as the Company was able to manage 10 material receipts and ship product from finished inventory. Accounts payable and accrued expenses increased approximately $374,000 during the first quarter as a result of the increase in business volume and the lengthening of the payment cycle for certain vendors. The Company spent $218,000 on capital equipment purchases and $86,000used approximately $30,000 to fund internal software development costs. The Company generated cash from financing activities in the first quarter of fiscal 1999 of $286,000, primarilycosts while capital expenditures were $7,000 as a result of a Company-wide freeze on capital spending. The Company has a revolving line of credit with a bank which expires November 1, 1999 (the "Line of Credit"). Borrowings under the Line of Credit were $575,000 at June 27, 1999. As of June 27, 1999, maximum availability under the Line of Credit was equal to the lesser of (i) $1.3 million or (ii) 80% of qualified accounts receivable (the "Borrowing Base"). Such maximum availability decreases to the lesser of (i) $350,000 or (ii) the Borrowing Base after the earlier of August 31, 1999 or receipt by the Company utilizing it working capitalof a refund of federal taxes paid by the Company in respect of fiscal 1998, which refund the Company expects will be approximately $1.3 million. At June 27, 1999, the Borrowing Base was $1.3 million. The Credit Line is secured by all assets of the Company. The credit agreement establishing the Credit Line prohibits the payment of dividends without the bank's consent and requires the maintenance of specified debt to net worth and current ratios. The credit agreement also requires that the Company not incur quarterly net losses of more than a specified amount. As of June 27, 1999, the Company was in compliance with its bank covenants. The Company is currently refinancing its bank debt and has received a commitment from another lender to provide a replacement credit line to the Company. The replacement line of credit.credit which will have a two year term will allow for maximum availability of $3.0 million based on a percentage of qualifed accounts receivable and inventory. The line will be secured by all the assets of the Company expectsand will be subject to continuecertain financial covenants including specified levels of net worth, and debt to experiencenet worth ratios and limitations on capital expenditures. The replacement line of credit will accrue interest at a slowdownrate of prime plus 1.5%. The bank may alter or terminate its commitment with respect to the replacement line of credit if there is any material adverse change in the volumeCompany's financial position or otherwise. However, to the extent that there is a shortfall of business duefunds under the commitment, management has the ability and intent to adverse marketadjust the Company's cash flows to be able to meet operational needs at least through the end of fiscal 2000. Although the Company is cautiously optimistic that it will benefit from improving conditions in the semiconductor industry.market generally, improvement in the Company's results of operation may be tempered by technological changes in semiconductor packaging designs impacting the demand for the Company's current products. As a result, the Company intends to monitor, and further reduce if necessary, its expenses if projected lower net sales levels continue. Although the Company anticipates that it will incur losses in future quarters which will negatively impact its liquidity position, the Company believes that funds generated from operations, existing cash balances and available borrowing capacity and if necessary additional financing, will be sufficient to meet the Company's cash requirements for at least the next twelve months. YEARHowever, if the Company is unable to meet its operating plan, and in particular its forecast for product shipments, the Company may require additional capital. There can be no assurance that if the Company is required to secure additional capital that such capital will be available on reasonable terms, if at all, at such time as required by the Company. The Company has been notified by The Nasdaq-Amex Group that the Company is currently not in compliance with the Nasdaq National Market listing requirement that the market value of the Company's common stock held by the public be greater than $5,000,000. If the Company is unable to satisfy this requirement for a specified number of consecutive days prior to September 16, 1999, its common stock will be delisted at the opening of business on September 20, 1999. Although in that event the Company 11 could apply to list its shares with the Nasdaq SmallCap Market, its delisting from the Nasdaq National Market could adversely affect the liquidity of the Company's stock. In addition, delisting from the Nasdaq National Market might negatively impact the Company's reputation and, as a consequence, its business. Year 2000 COMPLIANCE--------- Historically, certain computer programs have been written using two digits rather than four to define the applicable year, which could result in a computer recognizing a date using "00" as the year 1900 rather than the year 2000. This in turn, could result in major system failures or miscalculations, and is generally referred to as the "Year 2000 Problem". -9- TheIn the second quarter of fiscal 1999, the Company is in the processcompleted its implementation of implementing a new enterprise-wide management information system that the vendor has represented is Year 2000 compliant. In addition, the Company has completed an initial assessment of other software used by the Company for Year 2000 compliance. Thecompliance and has noted no material instances of non-compliance. On an on-going basis, the Company also reviews each of its new hardware and software purchases to ensure that they areit is Year 2000 compliant. BasedThe Company has also conducted a review of its product line and has determined that most of the products it has sold and will continue to sell do not require remediation to be Year 2000 compliant. This conclusion is based partly on third party representations that product components, such as personal computers, will be year 2000 compliant. The Company had no means of ensuring that such suppliers' components will be Year 2000 compliant. The Company is in the foregoing,process of gathering information about the Year 2000 compliance status of its significant suppliers and customers. Additionally, the compliance status of the Company's external agents who process vital Company data such as payroll, employee benefits, and banking information have been queried for Year 2000 compliance. To date, the Company believes that the computer systems used by it areis not aware of any such external agent with a Year 2000 compliantissue that would materially impact the Company's results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. However, the Company had no means of ensuring that external agents will becomebe Year 2000 compliant without materiallyready. To date the Company has incurred approximately $870,000 ($207,000 expensed and adversely affecting$663,000 capitalized for new systems and equipment) related to all phases of the Company's financial positionYear 2000 compliance initiatives. Although the Company does not believe that it will incur any additional material costs or results of operations. However,experience material disruptions in its business associated with preparing its internal systems for Year 2000 compliance, there can be no assuranceassurances that the Company will not be materiallyexperience serious unanticipated negative consequences and/or material costs caused by undetected errors or defects in the technology used in its internal systems, which is comprised of third party software and adversely affected bythird party hardware that contain embedded software. The most reasonably likely worst case scenarios would include (i) corruption of data contained in the Company's internal information systems relating to, among other things, manufacturing and customer orders, shipments billing and collections, (ii) hardware failures, (iii) the failure of its significant vendors or customers to successfullyinfrastructure services provided by government agencies and timely achieveother third parties (i.e., electricity, phone service, water transport, payroll, employee benefits, etc.), (iv) warranty and litigation expense associated with third-party software incorporated into the Company's products that is not Year 2000 compliance with respectcompliant, and (v) a decline in sales resulting from disruptions in the economy generally due to their own computer systems. CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF "SAFE HARBOR" PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OFYear 2000 issues. 12 The Company has contingency plans for certain critical applications and is working on such plans for others. These contingency plans involve among other actions, manual workarounds and adjusting staffing strategies. Cautionary Statement for Purposes of "Safe Harbor" Provisions of the Private - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 - ---------------------------------------- This Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements relating to future events or the future financial performance of the Company. The Company's future results are difficult to predict and may be affected by a number of important risk factors including, but not limited to, the factors listed in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 1998.28, 1999. The Company wishes to caution readers that those important factors, in some cases, have affected, and in the future could affect, the Company's actual consolidated quarterly or annual operating results and could cause those actual consolidated quarterly or annual operating results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company. -10-13 ASECO CORPORATION PART II - OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings: None. Item 2. Changes in Securities:Securities and Use of Proceeds: None. Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities: NoneNone. Item 4. Submissions of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders: NoneNone. Item 5. Other Information: NoneNone. Item 6. Exhibits and reports on Form 8-K: a. See Exhibit IndexExhibits - None b. There were no reports on Form 8-K filed for the three months ended June 28, 1998. -11- EXHIBIT INDEX EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION 10.2 1993 Non-Employee Director Stock Option Plan (as amended and restated as of May 12, 1998) 10.3 1993 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (as amended and restated as of June 18, 1998) -12-27, 1999. 14 ASECO CORPORATION SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Signature Title Date /s/ Sebastian J. Sicari President and Chief Executive August 12,1998 - ----------------------- Officer (principal executive Sebastian J. Sicari President, Chief Executive Officer August 11, 1999 - ----------------------- (principal executive officer) Sebastian J. Sicari /s/ Mary R. Barletta Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, August 11, 1999 - ----------------------- Treasurer (principal financial and accounting Mary R. Barletta officer) /s/ Mary R. Barletta Vice President, Chief August 12,1998 - ----------------------- Financial Officer, Mary R. Barletta Treasurer (principal financial and accounting officer) 13 2
15