UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2003

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From to

Commission File Number 0-10964

MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

x Delaware		~~QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934~~95-2390133

	~~For the Quarter Ended September 29, 2002~~

o	~~TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934~~

	~~For the Transition Period From __________ to __________~~



	~~Commission File Number 0-10964~~

~~MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~
~~(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)~~

~~Delaware~~		~~95-2390133~~
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

9244 Balboa Avenue, San Diego, CA		92123
(Address of principal executive office)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (858) ~~279-5100~~503-3300

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No o

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yesý No o

As of ~~October 31, 2002,~~May 9, 2003, Registrant had only one class of common stock, of which there were ~~13,700,187~~13,754,654 shares outstanding.

MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
For the quarter ended ~~September 29, 2002~~March 31, 2003
~~Page~~PART I

~~PART I~~
Item 1.
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
Item 2.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
14
Item 3.
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
24
Item 4.
Controls and Procedures
24

PART II

Item 1.
Legal Proceedings
25
Item 2.
Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
25
Item 3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
25
Item 4.
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
25
Item 5.
Other Information
25
Item 6.
Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
26
Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this ~~Quarterly~~Annual Report on Form ~~10-Q~~10-K to “Maxwell,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” and “our” refer to Maxwell Technologies, Inc. and its subsidiaries; all references to “Montena Components” refer to our subsidiary Montena Components, Ltd. which has been renamed to Maxwell Technologies, SA; all references to “Electronic Components Group” refer to our former subsidiary, Maxwell Electronic Components Group, Inc.; which has been merged into Maxwell; all references to “I-Bus/Phoenix” refer to our subsidiary, I-Bus/Phoenix, Inc., and its subsidiaries; ~~all references to “Montena Components” refers to our subsidiary Montena Components Ltd.;~~and all references to “PurePulse” refer to our subsidiary, PurePulse Technologies, Inc.~~; all references to “Sierra” refer to the Sierra KD division of the Electronic Components Group; and all references to TeknaSeal refer to the TeknaSeal division of the Electronic Components Group.~~ This Form 10-Q may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. The Company’s actual results may differ significantly from the results discussed in any forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause such a difference include, but are not limited to those discussed in “Risk Factors” included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2001.~~2002. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in the material set forth under “Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” as well as within this Form 10-Q generally.

2
~~PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~
~~Item 1.   Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~
MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
~~CONDENSED~~ CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
~~(in thousands)~~

September 29,
2002

December 31,
2001

(Unaudited)

(Audited)

Assets

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$
715

$
13,673

Short-term investments

7,627

11,886

Accounts receivable, net

10,095

13,984

Inventories

12,843

16,605

Assets held for sale

11,820

—

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

853

1,031

Due from related parties

272

—

Income tax receivable

278

—

Total current assets

44,503

57,179

Property, plant and equipment, net

12,130

21,741

Goodwill and other non-current assets

19,814

6,784

$
76,447

$
85,704

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$
14,828

$
12,159

Due to related parties

86

—

Accrued employee compensation

2,091

1,586

Short-term and current portion of long-term debt

577

300

Net liabilities of discontinued operations

3,176

1,642

Liabilities held-for-sale

234

—

Total current liabilities

20,992

15,687

Long-term debt

5,500

5,700

Minority interest

—

4,586

Stockholders’ equity:

Common stock

1,370

1,017

Additional paid-in capital

112,185

84,283

Notes receivable from executives for stock purchases

—

(897
)

Accumulated deficit

(63,506
)

(23,859
)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

(94
)

(813
)

Total stockholders’ equity

49,955

59,731

$
76,447

$
85,704

~~See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.~~
2

~~MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.~~
~~UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS~~
(in thousands, except per share data)

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 29,
2002

September 30,
2001

September 29,
2002

September 30,
2001

Sales

$
16,564

$
15,017

$
42,509

$
62,473

Cost of sales

13,858

14,406

39,651

53,453

Gross profit

2,706

611

2,858

9,020

Operating expenses:

Selling, general and administrative

5,171

4,919

14,766

17,559

Research and development

2,167

2,946

7,080

8,871

Impairment of long lived assets

7,628

—

7,628

—

Restructuring charge

922

—

1,734

—

Amortization expense of intangible assets

348

299

348

895

Total operating expenses

16,236

8,164

31,556

27,325

Operating loss

(13,530
)

(7,553
)

(28,698
)

(18,305
)
Gain (loss) on sale of business

(7,219
)

—

(7,219
)

39,119

Interest expense

(118
)

(70
)

(310
)

(1,216
)
Interest income and other, net

205

332

629

477

Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest

(20,662
)

(7,291
)

(35,598
)

20,075

Provision (credit) for income taxes

124

(63
)

(155
)

9,624

Minority interest in net loss of subsidiaries

—

(282
)

(241
)

(86
)

Income (loss) from continuing operations

(20,786
)

(6,946
)

(35,202
)

10,537

Discontinued operations, net of taxes

(2,761
)

(3,498
)

(4,445
)

(779
)

Net income (loss)

$
(23,547
)
$
(10,444
)
$
(39,647
)
$
9,758

Basic net income (loss) per share:

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$
(1.53
)
$
(0.68
)
$
(2.99
)
$
1.05

(Loss) from discontinued operations

(0.20
)

(0.35
)

(0.38
)

(0.08
)

Net income (loss)

$
(1.73
)
$
(1.03
)
$
(3.37
)
$
0.97

Diluted net income (loss) per share:

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$
(1.53
)
$
(0.68
)
$
(2.99
)
$
0.96

(Loss) from discontinued operations

(0.20
)

(0.35
)

(0.38
)

(0.07
)

Net income (loss)

$
(1.73
)
$
(1.03
)
$
(3.37
)
$
0.89

Shares used in computing:

Basic net income (loss) per share

13,597

10,160

11,770

10,048

Diluted net income (loss) per share

13,597

10,160

11,770

10,735

March 31
2003

December 31
2002

(unaudited)

Assets

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$
4,619

$
3,545

Short-term investments

5,595

7,546

Trade and other accounts receivable, net

6,363

8,530

Inventories

11,584

11,833

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

1,114

1,037

Assets held-for-sale

7,356

7,356

Total current assets

36,631

39,847

Property, plant and equipment, net

11,237

11,653

Other intangible assets, net

2,046

2,009

Goodwill

17,716

17,577

Other non-current assets

295

294

$
67,925

$
71,380

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

$
8,294

$
11,508

Deferred revenue

5,098

2,305

Accrued employee compensation

1,900

1,590

Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt

3,484

570

Deferred tax liability

279

272

Liabilities of discontinued operations

2,573

2,326

Total current liabilities

21,628

18,571

Deferred tax liability

183

183

Long-term debt, excluding current portion

—

2,675

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders’ equity:

Common stock, $0.10 par value per share, 40,000 shares authorized; 13,765 and 13,726 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively

1,377

1,373

Additional paid-in capital

112,372

112,255

Accumulated deficit

(68,376
)
(64,015
)
Accumulated other comprehensive income

741

338

Total stockholders’ equity

46,114

49,951

$
67,925

$
71,380

~~See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.~~
3

MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~CASH FLOWS~~
OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share data)

Nine Months Ended

September 29,
2002

September 30,
2001

Operating activities:

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$
(35,202
)
$
10,537

Adjustments to reconcile income (loss) from continuing operating activities net of cash used in operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

3,638

4,061

Impairment of long-lived assets

7,628

—

Provision for losses on accounts receivable

226

—

Non-cash restructuring charges

3,573

—

Deferred income taxes

(278
)

8,952

Minority interest in net loss of subsidiaries

(241
)

(40
)

Loss (gain) on sale of business

7,219

(39,119
)

Cancellation of executive stock notes

(116
)

—

Deferred compensation

—

15

Changes in operating assets and liabilities net of cash used in operating activities

2,764

(1,355
)

Net cash used in operating activities

(10,789
)

(16,949
)
Investing activities:

Proceeds from sale of businesses

—

66,249

Purchase of business, net of cash acquired

(2,692
)

—

Purchases of property and equipment

(1,583
)

(4,948
)

Proceeds from sale of short-term investments

13,075

4,534

Purchases of short-term investments

(8,789
)

(23,893
)

Proceeds from collection of notes receivable

—

2,100

Net cash provided by investing activities

11

44,042

Financing activities:

Principal payments on long-term debt and short-term borrowings

(200
)

(57,637
)

Proceeds from short-term borrowings

—

37,103

Proceeds from issuance of Company and subsidiary stock

1,223

2,837

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

1,023

(17,697
)

Net cash used in discontinued operations

(2,911
)

(3,995
)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

(292
)

335

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

(12,958
)

5,736

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

13,673

2,686

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
715

$
8,422

Three Months Ended March 31,

2003

2002

Sales

$
10,241

$
12,789

Costs and expenses:

Cost of sales

8,930

11,842

Selling, general and administrative

4,040

4,691

Research and development

1,307

2,667

Other

(236
)
(214
)
Total costs and expenses

14,041

18,986

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

(3,800
)
(6,197
)
Provision for income taxes

(14
)
(291
)
Loss from continuing operations

(3,786
)
(5,906
)
Discontinued operations, net of taxes:

Loss from operations

(575
)
(805
)
Gain on disposal

—

—

Net loss from discontinued operations

(575
)
(805
)

Net loss

$
(4,361
)
$
(6,711
)

Basic net loss per share:

Loss from continuing operations

$
(0.28
)
$
(0.57
)
Loss from discontinued operations

(0.04
)
(0.08
)
Net loss

$
(0.32
)
$
(0.65
)

Liabilities of discontinued operations

Loss from continuing operations

$
(0.28
)
$
(0.57
)
Loss from discontinued operations

(0.04
)
(0.08
)
Net loss

$
(0.32
)
$
(0.65
)

Shares used in computing:

Basic net loss per share

13,741

10,395

Diluted net loss per share

13,741

10,395

~~See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.~~
4

MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)

Three Months Ended March 31,

2003

2002

Operating activities:

Loss from continuing operations

$
(3,786
)
$
(5,906
)
Adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing operating activities, net of cash used in operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

877

1,069

Other noncash items

(222
)
(241
)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net

2,352

40

Net cash used in operating activities

(779
)
(5,038
)
Investing activities:

Proceeds from sale of businesses and equipment

278

—

Purchases of property and equipment

(397
)
(468
)
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments

2,836

7,739

Purchases of short-term investments

(924
)
(5,067
)
Net cash provided by investing activities

1,793

2,204

Financing activities:

Principal payments on long-term debt and short-term borrowings

(75
)
(50
)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings

314

—

Proceeds from issuance of Company and subsidiary stock

121

446

Net cash provided by financing activities

360

396

Net cash provided by (used in) discontinued operations

(328
)
915

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

28

(2
)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

1,074

(1,525
)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

3,545

13,673

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
4,619

$
12,148

5

MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

The information contained herein has been prepared by Maxwell in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information at September 29, 2002 and for the three and nine month periods ended September 29, 2002 and September 30, 2001 is unaudited. Theaccompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements, ~~reflect all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring accruals, which are,~~ in the opinion of management, include all adjustments necessary for a fair ~~statement~~presentation of the results offor the interim periods presented. These adjustments consist of normal recurring accruals. The consolidated financial statements ~~and notes thereto should be read~~are presented in ~~conjunction~~accordance with the ~~audited~~requirements of Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all the disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles. For further information refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s ~~annual report~~Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2001.~~ 2002.
Principles of Consolidation. The ~~results~~consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the ~~operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative~~Company and its wholly owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of ~~results to be expected for any other period or for the year as a whole.~~
     ~~The Company’s fiscal quarters are generally 13 weeks ending on the Sunday closest to March 31, June 30 and September 30. The Company completes its fiscal year on the actual day of December 31.~~
Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the ~~consolidated financials~~financial statements and ~~related notes. Changes~~disclosures made in the accompanying notes to the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those ~~estimates may affect amounts reported~~estimates.
New Accounting Pronouncements. In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (SFAS No. 146). This statement supercedes Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issue No. 94-3 “Liabilities Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in ~~future periods.~~a Restructuring)”. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized at the date an entity commits to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 is effective for any exit and disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
~~Note 2 — General~~In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”), Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN 45 requires that a liability be recorded in the guarantor’s balance sheet upon issuance of a guarantee. In addition, FIN 45 requires certain disclosures about each of the entity’s guarantees. The Company will apply the recognition provisions of FIN 45 to any guarantees issued after December 31, 2002.
~~Maxwell sells reliability. We develop,~~
In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation- Transition and Disclosure- an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123” (SFAS No. 148). This statement amends SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123) to provide alternative methods of voluntarily transitioning to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 also amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require disclosure of the method used to account for stock-based employee compensation and the effects of the method on reported results in both annual and interim financial statements. The disclosure provisions were effective for the Company’s year ended December 31, 2002. The Company has not yet completed the final evaluation of the options presented by SFAS No. 148. However, within the next year the company expects to reach a determination of whether and, if so, when to change the Company’s existing accounting for stock-based compensation to the fair value method in accordance with the transition alternatives of SFAS No. 148.
Note 2– Strategic Alliance
The Company has formed an alliance with Yeong-Long Technologies Co., Ltd., (“Yeong-Long”) to manufacture and market ~~electronic components~~its proprietary BOOSTCAP® ultracapacitor products in China. The alliance grants an exclusive royalty-bearing license to Yeong-Long to manufacture and ~~systems that perform reliably for~~sell BOOSTCAP products in China, and to sell to other mutually agreed customers elsewhere in Asia. In addition to the ~~life~~license, the Company will supply Yeong-Long with proprietary electrode material to make ultracapacitor cells, and will begin purchasing finished
6

ultracapacitors from Yeong-Long in 2004 to supplement its internal production capacity. Under the terms of ~~any application. Our core customer value proposition is~~the arrangement, the Company received an initial payment of $3 million and can receive additional payments totaling $2 million based on the ~~guarantee~~satisfaction of certain conditions. Maxwell will also receive payments for the supply of electrode material as well as a royalty on Yeong-Long’s ultracapacitor sales. Maxwell has offered Yeong-Long the option to buy the right to manufacture the electrode material for a separate payment. The Company has accounted for its arrangement with Yeong-Long in accordance with EITF 00-21: Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables (“EITF 00-21”). Under the provisions of EITF 00-21, the Company has determined that ~~our products will not fail. We achieve high reliability through~~ the ~~application~~delivery of ~~proprietary~~the manufacturing licenses to Yeong-Long and the option to buy the right to manufacture the electrode material represent a separate unit of accounting. Accordingly, the Company has deferred recognition of the initial $3 million until the delivery of certain technology and through rigorously controlled design, development, manufacturing and test processes. Our strategic focus on high reliability permits us to deliver high-value products that ensure mission critical uptime, durability and full functionality of our customers’ end products and, therefore, to command higher gross margins than traditional electronic products.
     Based on our strategy, we develop, manufacture and market high-reliability power and microelectronic products for original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) in multiple industries. Our power products address applications in transportation, telecommunications, consumer and industrial electronics, electric utility infrastructure and medical imaging. Our microelectronics products primarily address applications in aerospace. Our power product lines are comprised of ultracapacitors, high-voltage capacitors and custom power and energy storage systems; and our microelectronic product lines are comprised of radiation-shielded power modules, memory modules, ASICs and single board computers. We also sell automated accelerated life testers that permit customers to determine the ~~intrinsic reliability of their microelectronics.~~
~~Note 3 — Acquisitions, Divestitures, Assets Held for Sale~~
     ~~On July 5, 2002, the Company acquired Montena Components, a Swiss corporation with its principal facility in Rossens, Switzerland. In the transaction, the Company acquired all~~exercise or expiration of the ~~outstanding shares~~electrode material purchase option. The supply of ~~capital stock of Montena Components from its parent company, Montena SA, a Swiss corporation, in exchange for (i) 2,250,000 shares of Maxwell common stock issued directly~~electrode material to Montena SA and (ii) an additional 300,000 shares of Maxwell common stock held by the Company as collateral for a $3 million loan to Montena SA. The purpose of such loan was to assist Montena SA in acquiring the minority of Montena Components’ outstanding stock not already owned by Montena SA and facilitating our acquisition of all outstanding shares of Components’ stock. Under the original agreement, Montena SA, committed to sell the 300,000 shares as promptly as practical after closing to repay the
5

~~loan. Instead of requiring Montena SA to sell the shares, the Company accepted the return of the shares in satisfaction of the loan.~~
     In addition, we agreed to issue contingent consideration to Montena SA as follows: To the extent that each share of Maxwell stock issued as part of the purchase price and held by Montena SA on September 1, 2003 has a market value based on the average 30 trading-day closing price ending on September 1, 2003 (the “30 Day Measurement Price”) of less than $9 per share, then the Company will provide to Montena SA additional consideration equal, in total value, to (i) the difference between $9 and the 30 Day Measurement Price multiplied by (ii) such number of shares held by Montena SA on September 1, 2003; provided, however, that such additional consideration will in no event be greater than 500,000 shares of Maxwell common stock (based on the 30 Day Measurement Price) or cash equal in value to 500,000 shares of Maxwell common stock valued at the 30 Day Measurement Price. Such additional consideration may be provided by the Company, and in our discretion, in cash or in shares of Maxwell common stock, subject to the following conditions: the Company shall provide such additional consideration in shares of Maxwell common stock only if the authority for such issuanceYeong-Long has been ~~approved by the shareholders~~determined to represent a separate unit of Maxwell. In the event that Montena SA votes its shares of Maxwell common stock on such matter, Montena SA agreed to vote such shares to approve the use of Maxwell common stock as the additional consideration.
~~The purchase price was allocated as follows (in thousands):~~
Total acquisition cost:
Cash and stock paid at acquisition    $ 20,949
Acquisition related expenses    300

   $ 21,249

Allocation to assets and liabilities as follows:
Tangible assets    $ 14,813
Assumed liabilities    (9,988 )
Acquired backlog    464
Developed core technology    1,136
Goodwill    14,824

   $ 21,249

     ~~The following Pro Forma table gives effect to the acquisition of Montena Components as if the transaction occurred as of January 1~~^st ~~2001 (in thousands).~~
Pro Forma Results

Nine Months Ended September 2002

Nine Months Ended September 2001

Revenue

$
52,518

$
78,139

Loss from continuing operations

$
(34,039
)

$
10,074

Loss per share

$
(2.67
)

$
0.78

     ~~On September 29, 2002, the Company’s I-Bus/Phoenix subsidiary sold substantially all of the assets, liabilities~~accounting and business operations of its applied computing business, located principally in San Diego, California and Tangmere, United Kingdom, to I-Bus Corporation, a new company, whose principal shareholders are former I-Bus/Phoenix senior managers. The applied computing business designs, manufactures and sells applied computing systems mainly to original equipment manufacturers serving the telecommunications, broadcasting and industrial automation markets. The business was sold for (i) an 8% Senior Subordinated Note in the aggregate principal amount of $7 million, under the terms of which $1 million is payable (plus 50% of all accrued interest) on March 30, 2004 and $3 million is payable (plus 100% of all accrued interest) on each of March 30, 2005 and March 30, 2006; (ii) a warrant to purchase up to 19.9% of the common stock of the new I-Bus Corporation exercisable any time after June 30, 2004 at the fair market value per share at the time of exercise; and (iii) a possible additional contingent purchase price payment of $1 million if the new I-Bus Corporation sells the computing business prior to the full payment of the 8% Senior Subordinated Note referred to above. I-Bus/Phoenix also agreed to reimburse I-Bus Corporation for certain shutdown and restructuring costs and to provide a back up working capital credit facility in the amount of $300,000 until September 2003. The Company will not assign value to the subordinated debt as its collectibility is uncertain. The table below details the loss recognized by the Company related to the sale. In addition, the Company incurred related restructuring charges discussed in Note 11.
Disposition of I-Bus computing systems assets (in thousands):

Subordinated note receivable

$
7,000

Less reserve for note

(7,000
)

Assets sold net of liabilities assumed by buyer

(6,252
)

Shutdown costs assumed by Maxwell

(762
)

Net loss on disposition of I-Bus computing systems

$
(7,014
)

     In addition, the company recorded $7.6 million of impairment of long lived-assets. The write down of impaired assets consists of $5.3 million of goodwill associated with the computing systems business and $2.3 million of Maxwell Technologies assets that supported the computing systems business.
6

     Maxwell plans to sell the manufacturing and administrative facility in San Diego that contained I-Bus/Phoenix’s U.S. operations. The facility is classified as Assets Held for Sale in these financial statements and is carried at net book value of $7.4 million.
     On September 30, 2002, the Company sold substantially all of the assets, liabilities and business operations of its TeknaSeal glass-to-metal seals division in Minneapolis, Minnesota, to a group of private investors. TeknaSeal designs, manufactures and sells hermetic glass-to-metal seals for vacuum components, battery headers, implantable medical devices and other specialty applications. The aggregate purchase price was $5.5 million in cash, of which $1 million is held in an escrow account. Each calendar quarter following the sale, the escrow agent will release from escrow an amount equal to 40% of the sales during that quarter to certain key customers. If no sales to those customers occur during any calendar quarter during the term of the escrow, all remaining sums then held in escrow are to be paid to the buyers and the escrow terminated. The escrow otherwise terminates when all amounts held thereunder have been paid to Maxwell. Approximately $384,000 of the $5.5 million is payable to certain TeknaSeal employees under a TeknaSeal incentive program. The net cash proceeds of the TeknaSeal sale have been invested in short-term cash equivalents and will be used to finance the Company’s ongoing liquidity requirements. Because the Company’s third fiscal quarter ended September 29, 2002 and this transaction closed September 30, 2002 the assets and liabilities of TeknaSeal have been classified as Held for Sale in these financial statements. The table below details the transaction, whichrevenue will be recognized inas the ~~Company’s fourth fiscal quarter.~~
Disposition of TeknaSeal assets (in thousands):

Cash received

$
5,500

Less amount held in escrow

(1,000
)

Assets sold net of liabilities assumed by buyer

(1,313
)

Goodwill associated with TeknaSeal

(2,917
)

Estimated expenses related to sale

(270
)

Net income on disposition of TeknaSeal

$
—

~~Note 4 — Inventories~~material is delivered.

Note 3 – Inventories
Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):

September 29,
2002

December 31,
2001

Finished products

$
4,844

$
3,289

Work-in-process

3,252

878

Parts and raw materials

9,376

16,334

Inventory Reserve

(4,629
)

(3,896
)

$
12,843

$
16,605

7

March 31,
2003

December 31,
2002

Inventory:

Finished goods

$
5,352

$
4,495

Work-in-process

2,003

2,130

Raw material and purchased parts

6,830

7,234

Inventory reserve

(2,601
)
(2,026
)

$
11,584

$
11,833

Note ~~5 — Comprehensive Income (Loss)~~4 – Warranty Reserve
The Company ~~reports and displays comprehensive income (loss) in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 130,~~ ~~Reporting Comprehensive Income~~~~. The components of comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 and September 30, 2001 were as follows (in thousands):~~

Three Months Ended
September

Nine Months Ended
September

2002

2001

2002

2001

Net income (loss)

$
(23,547
)
$
(10,444
)
$
(39,647
)
$
9,758

Foreign currency translation adjustments

568

282

692

(19
)
Unrealized gain on securities

17

120

27

120

Comprehensive income (loss)

$
(22,962
)
$
(10,042
)
$
(38,928
)
$
9,859

~~Note 6 — Income (Loss) Per Share~~
     ~~The Company reports basic and diluted income (loss) per share in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 128,~~ ~~Earnings Per Share.~~ ~~Basic income (loss) per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted income (loss) per share is calculated~~provides limited warranties on ~~the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of outstanding stock options of the Company and~~ certain of its ~~subsidiaries, assuming their exercise using the “treasury stock” method,~~products for periods of up to 2 years. The Company recognizes warranty reserves when products are shipped based upon an estimate of total warranty costs, and ~~convertible preferred shares outstanding at certain subsidiaries~~such reserves are included in accrued liabilities. The estimate of ~~the Company, assuming their conversion.~~
8

such costs is based upon historical and anticipated requirements.

Additions

Balance at
As of
December 31, 2002

Charges to
Cost and
Expenses

Deductions
For Costs
Incurred

Deductions
For Change
in Estimate

Balance at
As of
March 31, 2003

Accrued Warranty

$
947

$
393

$
(352
)
$
—

$
988

Note 5 – Comprehensive Income
The following table sets forth the ~~computation~~components of ~~basic~~comprehensive income (in thousands):

Three Months Ended
March 31,

2003

2002

Net loss

$
(4,361
)
$
(6,711
)
Foreign currency translation adjustments

442

(15
)
Unrealized loss on securities

(39
)
(55
)
Comprehensive loss

$
(3,958
)
$
(6,781
)
Note 6 – Business Segments
The following table displays summarized information about the Company’s operations by business segment (in thousands):

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2003

2002

Revenue:

High Reliability

$
7,833

$
7,555

Winding Equipment

2,408

—

I-Bus Computing Systems

—

4,139

Sierra and TeknaSeal

—

1,095

Consolidated total

$
10,241

$
12,789

Income (loss):

High Reliability

$
(2,495
)
$
(3,030
)
Winding Equipment

(237
)
—

I-Bus Computing Systems

(114
)
(2,721
)
Sierra and TeknaSeal

—

274

Total segment operating loss

(2,846
)
(5,477
)
Corporate expenses

1,209

934

(Gain) loss on sale of businesses

(228
)
—

Minority interest

—

(241
)
Interest and other, net

(27
)
27

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes

$
(3,800
)
$
(6,197
)
Note 7 – Restructuring
The following table displays the activity and ~~diluted income (loss)~~balances of the restructuring reserve (in thousands):

Severance Costs
for Involuntary
Employee
Terminations

Costs to Exit
Certain
Contractual and
Lease Obligations

Moving and Other
Costs Related to
Consolidation of
Facilities

Total
Restructuring
Charges

Balance December 31, 2002

$
304

$
47

$
—

$
351

Reserves established:

Utilization of reserves:

Cash

(151
)
—

—

(151
)

Balance March 31, 2003

$
153

$
47

$
—

$
200

Item 8 – Stock Compensation
The Company accounts for stock-based compensation in accordance with Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and FASB Interpretation No. 44, Accounting for Certain Transactions Involving Stock Compensation.
7

Pro forma information regarding net loss and loss per share is required by SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-based Compensation, and has been determined as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options under the fair value method of that Statement. For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options’ vesting period. The Company’s pro forma information is as follows (in thousands, except for net loss per share ~~amounts).~~

Three Months Ended
September

Nine Months Ended
September

2002

2001

2002

2001

Basic:

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$
(20,786
)
$
(6,946
)
$
(35,202
)
$
10,537

Loss from discontinued operations

(2,761
)

(3,498
)

(4,445
)

(779
)

Net income (loss)

$
(23,547
)
$
(10,444
)
$
(39,647
)
$
9,758

Weighted average shares

13,597

10,160

11,770

10,048

Basic net income (loss) per share:

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$
(1.53
)
$
(0.68
)
$
(2.99
)
$
1.05

Loss from discontinued operations

(0.20
)

(0.35
)

(0.38
)

(0.08
)

Basic net income (loss) per share

$
(1.73
)
$
(1.03
)
$
(3.37
)
$
0.97

Diluted:

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$
(20,786
)
$
(6,946
)
$
(35,202
)
$
10,537

Effect of dilutive securities of majority-owned subsidiaries

—

—

—

(259
)

Income (loss) from continuing operations available to common shareholders, as adjusted

(20,786
)

(6,946
)

(35,202
)

10,278

Loss from discontinued operations, as adjusted

(2,761
)

(3,498
)

(4,445
)

(779
)

Net income (loss), as adjusted

$
(23,547
)
$
(10,444
)
$
(39,647
)
$
9,499

Weighted average shares

13,597

10,160

11,770

10,048

Effect of dilutive securities of majority-owned subsidiaries

—

—

—

687

Weighted average shares, as adjusted

13,597

10,160

11,770

10,735

Diluted net income (loss) per share:

Income (loss) from continuing operations

$
(1.53
)
$
(0.68
)
$
(2.99
)
$
0.96

Loss from discontinued operations

(0.20
)

(0.35
)

(0.38
)

(0.07
)

Diluted net income (loss) per share

$
(1.73
)
$
(1.03
)
$
(3.37
)
$
0.89

~~Note 7 — Business Segments~~information):
~~Maxwell historically has evaluated~~

Three Months ended March 31,

2003

2002

Loss from continuing operations as reported

$
(3,786
)
$
(5,906
)
Pro forma loss from continuing operations

$
(5,613
)
$
(9,228
)

Loss from continuing operations, per share, as reported

$
(0.28
)
$
(0.57
)
Pro forma loss from continuing operations per share

$
(0.41
)
$
(0.89
)
The fair value for these options was estimated at the ~~performance~~dates of grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following weighted-average assumptions.

2003

2002

Risk free interest rate

3.3

3.3

Dividend yield

0

0

Volatility

50.3

68.4

Weighted average expected life

5 years

5 years

The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options that have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company’s employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management’s opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its business segments and allocated resources based on a measure of segment operating results, excluding restructuring, acquisition and other charges, or on items of income or expense below operating results. Accordingly, such items have not been segregated by operating segment.employee stock options.
9

     The following table sets forth sales and operating loss data for each of the Company’s business segments as defined by the Company under the guidelines of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 131, ~~Disclosures About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information~~ ~~(in thousands).~~

Three Months Ended
September

Nine Months Ended
September

2002

2001

2002

2001

Sales;

Electronic Components Group

$
10,898

$
3,945

$
20,534

$
22,860

I-Bus/Phoenix Power and Computing System

5,666

11,072

21,975

39,613

Consolidated total

$
16,564

$
15,017

$
42,509

$
62,473

Operating loss:

Electronic Components Group

$
(855
)
$
(3,973
)
$
(3,815
)
$
(7,593
)

I-Bus/Phoenix Power and Computing System

(1,498
)

(2,745
)

(11,032
)

(7,299
)

Total segment operating loss

(2,353
)

(6,718
)

(14,847
)

(14,892
)

Impairment of long-lived assets

(7,628
)

—

(7,628
)

—

Restructuring

(922
)

—

(1,734
)

—

Corporate expenses

(2,627
)

(835
)

(4,489
)

(3,413
)

Consolidated total

$
(13,530
)
$
(7,553
)
$
(28,698
)
$
(18,305
)

Note 8—9 – Discontinued Operations

In 2001, the Company sold its ~~high voltage wound film capacitors and high voltage power supplies business, its time card and job cost accounting software~~defense contracting business and ~~its defense contracting business. In addition, the Company~~ committed to strategic alternatives for PurePulse, with the objective to sell all or a majority interest in the business. Accordingly, both the defense contracting business and PurePulse, each of which was previously classified as a separate segment, comprise discontinued operations for financial reporting purposes. In September 2002, the Company decided to suspend the operations of PurePulse.
PurePulse had been designing and developing systems that generate extremely intense, broad-spectrum, pulsed light to purify water and inactivate viruses and other pathogens that contaminate vaccines and products sourced from human or animal tissues, such as plasma derivatives, transfusion blood components and biopharmaceuticals. We plan to preserve its intellectual property and certain other technology assets for a possible future sale of such assets.
     In the third quarter 2002, we recorded non-cash charges of approximately $1.7 million and cash charges of approximately $541,000 for severance and other charges, related to the suspension of PurePulse’s operations.
Operating results of the Company’s discontinued operations are shown separately, net of tax, in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. The businesses included in discontinued operations had sales aggregating ~~$55,000~~$180,000 for the three months ended ~~September 2002~~March 31, 2003 and ~~no sales~~$228,000 for the three months ended ~~September 2001. Sales for~~March 31, 2002. In the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 2002 and 2001 were $758,000 and $11.7 million respectively. These amounts are not included in sales in~~March 31, 2003, the ~~accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations.~~
10

~~Note 9 — Adoption of SFAS 141 and 142~~
     ~~In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards board issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (SFAS 141),~~ ~~Business Combinations~~ ~~and No. 142 (SFAS 142),~~ ~~Goodwill and other Intangible Assets~~~~, effective~~Company revised an estimate for ~~the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Under the new rules, goodwill is no longer amortized but will be subject to annual impairment tests in accordance with the Statements.~~
     ~~The Company has implemented SFAS 141 and SFAS 142 and began applying the new rules on accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets effective January 1, 2002. The following table presents~~ a reconciliation of net loss and per share data to what would have been reported had the new rules been in effect during the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002 and September 30, 2001 (in thousands, except per share data):

Three Months Ended
September

Nine Months Ended
September

2002

2001

2002

2001

Sales:

Reported net loss from continuing operations

$
(20,786
)
$
(6,946
)
$
(35,202
)
$
10,537

Add back goodwill amortization, net of tax

—

209

—

627

Adjusted net loss from continuing operations

$
(20,786
)
$
(6,737
)
$
(35,202
)
$
11,164

Basic and diluted net income/(loss) from continuing operations per share:

Reported net loss from continuing operations

(1.53
)

(0.68
)

(2.99
)

1.05

Goodwill amortization, net of tax

.02

0.06

Adjusted basic net income/(loss) from continuing operations

(1.53
)

(0.66
)

(2.99
)

1.11

Adjusted diluted net income/(loss) from continuing operations

$
(1.53
)
$
(0.66
)
$
(2.99
)
$
1.04

~~Other Intangible Assets~~
     ~~Acquired intangible assets subject to amortization at September 29, 2002 were as follows (in thousands):~~

Useful
Lives

Gross Carrying
Value

Accumulated
Amortization

Net Carrying
Value

Developed core technology
10 years

$
1,148

$
30

$
1,118

Acquired backlog
6 months

464

348

116

$
1,612

$
378

$
1,234

     Amortization expense for intangible assets was $378,000 for the three and nine months ended September 29, 2002. The estimated amortization for each of the succeeding years ended December 31, 2002 through December 31, 2006 are as follows: 2002: $0.5 million; and $0.1 million for each year thereafter.
~~Goodwill~~
~~The carrying amount of goodwill not subject to amortization was $18 million as of September 29, 2002~~
11

~~Note 10 — Consolidation of Subsidiary Ownership~~
     In February 2002, PacifiCorp Energy Ventures, Inc., the largest minority shareholder in the Electronic Components Group, exchanged its preferred shares of the Electronic Components Group for 518,000 common shares of Maxwell pursuantlease obligation related to its ~~right under the original investment agreement. Maxwell recorded $3.6 million of excess purchase price associated with this conversion.~~
     On April 15, 2002, the Company completed merger transactions with the Electronic Components Group subsidiary and the I-Bus/Phoenix subsidiary whereby all of the remaining minority shareholdings and options in such subsidiaries were converted to shares and options of Maxwell.
     ~~The conversion ratio was established through an independent appraisal of the fair market value of the subsidiaries and an average trading price of Maxwell’s stock at the time of the appraisal.~~
     The Company issued 86,000 shares to Electronic Components Group minority shareholders in exchange for their ownership. The value of this stock issuance was determined at $795,000 based on the closing price of Maxwell shares on the day of the merger. The Company recorded $265,000 of excess purchase price associated with this conversion.
     The Company issued 479,000 shares to I-Bus/Phoenix minority shareholders in exchange for their ownership. The value of this stock issuance was determined at $4.4 million based on the closing price of Maxwell shares on the day of the merger. The Company recorded $1.1 million of goodwill associated with this conversion.
     ~~In addition, the Company issued options to purchase 520,000 common shares of Maxwell, in connection with these mergers in exchange for options to purchase shares of the subsidiaries.~~
~~Note 11 — Restructuring~~
     In prior years, the Company had recorded restructuring related charges in connection with actions to consolidate its facilities and reduce the cost structure of the Company. At the beginning of 2002, there was a restructuring reserve balance of $257,000 associated with these charges.
     In the first half of 2002, I-Bus/Phoenix introduced new applied computing products that had been developed in 2001. However, the market for applied computing products, particularly in telecommunications, deteriorated throughout 2002. The Company responded to the poor market conditions for computing systems and other capital goods by restructuring I-Bus/Phoenix. In June 2002, the Company began implementing the restructuring plandefense contracting business and recorded restructuring charges of $812,000 during the quarter ended June, 2002 comprised of i) severance payments and other employee related expenses of $269,000 and ii) impairment of assets that will no longer be used, facility lease terminations and other closure cost related to certain facilities in Europe totaling $543,000. In addition, the Company also determined that certain components in inventory had been adversely impacted. Accordingly, the Company recorded an inventorya charge of $3.0 million for certain excess and obsolete raw material components and finished goods. This charge is classified in “Cost of Sales” in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.$720,000.
     During the third fiscal quarter, the Company decided to sell the applied computing business of I-Bus/Phoenix to a new company organized by former I-Bus/Phoenix senior managers. In preparation for the sale and to configure the I-Bus/Phoenix computing business to be self-supporting, I-Bus/Phoenix consolidated all production of the applied computing products to its facility in Tangmere, UK, and reduced worldwide personnel. As a result of this plan, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $922,000 during the quarter ended September 2002.
12

     ~~The following table displays the activity and balances of the restructuring reserve for the quarter and nine months ended September, 2002 (in thousands):~~

Severance Costs
for Involuntary
Employee
Terminations

Costs to Exit
Certain
Contractual and
Lease
Obligations

Moving and Other
Costs Related to
Consolidation of
Facilities

Other

Total
Restructuring
Charges

Balance at December, 2001

$
257

$

$

$

$
257

Utilization of reserves:

Cash

(25
)

(25
)

Balance at March, 2002

232

232

Reserves established:

269

320

223

812

Utilization of reserves:

Cash

(310
)

(310
)

Non-cash

(223
)

(223
)

Foreign exchange loss

12

12

Balance June, 2002

191

320

—

12

523

Reserves established:

922

922

Utilization of reserves:

Cash

(190
)

(190
)

I-Bus disposition

(257
)

(257
)

Balance September, 2002

$
666

$
320

$
—

$
12

$
998

8
~~Note 12 — Restricted Stock Transactions~~
In June 2002 and as part of completing the consolidation of ownership by the Company of I-Bus/Phoenix, four employees and one consultant of I-Bus/Phoenix were granted 19,500 shares of the Company’s common stock subject to certain restrictions. The shares granted vest over the next two years and had a fair market value of $182,000 at the date of grant. As a result of the divestiture of the applied computing business operations completed in the 2002 third fiscal quarter, vesting was accelerated and the balance of the deferred compensation was fully amortized.
     In January 2000, the Board adopted, and the Company’s shareholders subsequently approved, the Company’s Management Equity Ownership Program (the “Program”). Under the Program, executive officers of the Company and other members of senior management selected by the Committee were offered full-recourse loans from the Company to be used to purchase stock of the Company. Repayments of the loans were secured by shares purchased with the loan proceeds. On June 3, 2002, the Company determined to extinguish the program and cancelled the 74,000 shares and $970,000 loan balance outstanding under the plan.
13

Item 2.2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Like many other high technology and industrial enterprises that are having difficult times with bookings and revenue, Maxwell ~~sells reliability. We develop, manufacture~~Technologies’ sales have suffered from a generally weak manufacturing environment.   On one side of the spectrum the commercial satellite market for our microelectronics products is very weak, and on the opposite side of the spectrum the electrical infrastructure redevelopment market ~~electronic components~~for our high-voltage capacitors in the United States is on hold due to lower demand for power and ~~systems that perform reliably~~very large state budget deficits. These secular factors have depressed sales and bookings in our High Reliability segment. As a result of this general economic environment and the impact of sudden acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), it is very difficult to forecast revenue trends for the ~~life~~next several quarters.
However, it is possible to measure Maxwell’s progress in two areas, first market share, and second cost containment.
Our win-ratio in the High Reliability segment continues to hold steady or grow.
•                  Our microelectronics group wins the majority of ~~any application.~~the business that is available to us, and we are introducing a much larger suite of products to expand our business range.
•                  Our ~~core customer value proposition~~BoostCap® ultracapacitors’ penetration is ~~based on~~growing significantly, and we are increasing market-share. We are introducing power systems products quarter in the ~~guarantee~~second quarter of 2003, which will utilize our BOOSTCAP ultracapactors in a system that provides up time in high availability applications and will expand our penetration into telecom and industrial markets.
•                  In High Tension we continue to hold market share and are introducing new capacitor products ~~will not fail.~~ for utility infrastructure to protect voltage metering and measurement instruments.
We ~~achieve high reliability through the application of proprietary technology, and through rigorously controlled design, development, manufacturing and test processes. Our strategic~~continue to focus on ~~high reliability permits us~~cost containment, both through headcount reduction and cash management. Global headcount has been reduced 9% during the first quarter of 2003 through business consolidations and direct headcount reductions. Our forward-going economic leverage is very high; on average, over 50% of each revenue dollar is a direct contributor to deliver high-value products that ensure mission critical uptime, durability and full functionality of our customers’ end products and, therefore, to command higher gross margins than traditional electronic products.
margin. Based on our ~~strategy, we develop, manufacture~~current product mix and ~~market high-reliability power~~cost structure, our break-even point has been reduced substantially to approximately $15 million in revenue per quarter.
Another significant milestone achieved in the first quarter was the formation of an ultracapacitor manufacturing and ~~microelectronic products for original equipment manufacturers (OEMs)~~marketing alliance in ~~multiple industries. Our power products address applications~~China with Yeong-Long Technologies Co., Ltd., a $200 million per annum manufacturer of electrolytic capacitors. This arrangement could contribute up to $5 million in ~~transportation, telecommunications, consumer~~cash, and ~~industrial electronics, electric utility infrastructure~~establishes ultracapacitor production facilities in China to complement our existing facilities in the U.S. and medical imaging. Our microelectronics products primarily address applications in aerospace. Our power product lines are comprised of ultracapacitors, high-voltage capacitors and custom power and energy storage systems; and our microelectronic product lines are comprised of radiation-shielded power modules, memory modules, ASICs and single board computers. We also sell automated accelerated life testers that permit customers to determine the intrinsic reliability of their microelectronics.Europe.
~~We recently initiated a series~~
Our Winding Equipment segment has been able to maintain its prior quarter revenue levels. However, approximately 80% of ~~steps~~its current quarter revenues are attributable to ~~intensify the focus on our strategy and to exit non-strategic businesses:~~
•
In July 2002, we acquired Montena Components, a Swiss manufacturer and marketer of ultracapacitors, high-voltage capacitors and battery and capacitor winding equipment, for $3 million in cash and 2.25 million shares of Maxwell common stock. This acquisition brought to Maxwell additional power business focused on high reliability components and additional design and production capability to position Maxwell as a reliable, global supplier. Montena Components is located in Rossens, Switzerland, near major automotive and industrial development and manufacturing centers in Germany, France and Italy.
•
In September 2002, we suspended the operations of our PurePulse subsidiary, which had been developing pulsed light purification systems, while preserving PurePulse intellectual property for a future sale.
•
On September 29, 2002, we sold the computing systems business of our I-Bus/Phoenix subsidiary for $7 million in debt and certain other consideration. Although the computing systems business has a strategic focus on high reliability, high availability computers, the markets for such systems, particularly telecommunications deteriorated so dramatically in 2002 that we no longer could be confident of near term growth for that business.
•
On September 30, 2002, we sold our non-core TeknaSeal glass-to-metal seals business in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in a transaction that is expected generate net proceeds of approximately $5 million in cash.
•
During the third quarter, we began the integration of the power systems business of I-Bus/Phoenix into our Electronic Components Group. Our existing power systems address the high reliability and high quality power needs of our medical imaging and industrial systems customers. Also, new power systems emerging from our research and development incorporate our ultracapacitor and other proprietary power electronics technology that address high reliability power back up applications in the industrial market.
14

~~When we complete the integration and relocation~~customers in China. In addition, approximately 59% of our ~~power systems business~~BoostCap revenues come from customers in Asia. Although not yet evident, future bookings and revenues may be adversely impacted by worsening economic activity and travel restrictions due to ~~our Electronic Components Group facility, we will vacate~~ the ~~facility that formerly housed the North American operations~~outbreak of I-Bus/Phoenix and sell it. The relocation of our power systems business to our Electronic Components Group facility will allow a more efficient use of our production facilities and personnel. The sale of the I-Bus/Phoenix facility will provide us with additional cash resources.
SARS.
~~With~~
Results of Operations
Sales
Our consolidated sales for the ~~completion~~quarter ended March 31, 2003 were $10.2 million, a decrease of ~~these actions, virtually all of Maxwell’s revenue~~$2.5 million, or 20%, from the quarter ended March 31, 2002. Sharp declines in ~~the fourth quarter and beyond will be derived from~~ the sale of power systems products to GE Medical Systems, which has decided to source these products from affiliates or other companies located in low cost countries, and ~~microelectronic products~~continued weakness in the satellite and ~~winding equipment, and~~other industrial markets served by the ~~Company’s core operations will be concentrated~~Company negatively impacted reported results. The decline of $3.5 million in ~~two primary facilities, one in San Diego, California, and the other in Rossens, Switzerland.~~
~~Business Segments~~
     ~~The Company’s continuing operations as~~sales of ~~September 29, 2002 were comprised of two business segments, as follows:~~
~~Electronic Components Group~~
     With acquisition of Montena Components in early July 2002, the Electronic Components Group business included the following high-reliability power and microelectronic products and winding equipment during the third quarter:
•
~~Ultracapacitors for electrical energy storage and delivery of peak power for a variety of applications.~~
~~High-voltage grading and coupling capacitors used in electric utility infrastructure, high-voltage laboratories and other applications involving transport and distribution of electrical energy.~~
•
~~Radiation-shielded microelectronics, including integrated circuits, power modules, memory modules and single board computers for aerospace and military applications.~~
•
~~Automated accelerated life test systems (AARTS) for RF and DC components used in applications requiring extremely high reliability.~~
•
~~Winding machines and automated assembly lines used to manufacture capacitors and batteries.~~
~~I-Bus/Phoenix Power and Computing Systems~~
     Prior to the sale of its computing systems business at the end of the third quarter (see “Asset Dispositions”), our I-Bus/Phoenix subsidiary designed, manufactured and marketed applied computing systems and power distribution and power conditioning systems mainly to OEMs serving the telecommunications, industrial automation, broadcasting and medical imaging markets. Although the computing systems business has a strategic focus on high reliability, high availability computers, the markets for such systems, particularly telecommunications deteriorated so dramatically in 2002 that we no longer could be confident in near term growth for that business.
     In preparation for the sale of the computing systems business and to configure it to be self-supporting, we consolidated worldwide operations of the computing business at the end of the third quarter and recorded non-cash charges of approximately $14.1 million related to asset impairments and loss on sale of business, and cash charges of approximately $1.7 million for severance and shut down cost.
     ~~During the third quarter of 2002, we began the integration of the~~ power systems business of I-Bus/Phoenix into our Electronic Components Group. Our existing power systems address high reliability and high quality power needs of our medical imaging and industrial systems customers. Also, new power systems emerging from our
15
research and development incorporate our ultra high reliability, life of the application ultracapacitor and other proprietary power electronics technology. We have also started to relocate our power systems business from the Company-owned facility that housed the I-Bus/Phoenix North American operations to our Electronic Components Group facility. The move will be completed during the fourth quarter and will allow a more efficient use of Electronic Components Group production facility and personnel. The Company-owned facility has been offered for sale.
~~PurePulse~~
     In September 2002, our PurePulse subsidiary suspended operations. PurePulse had been designing and developing systems that generate extremely intense, broad-spectrum, pulsed light to purify water and inactivate viruses and other pathogens that contaminate vaccines and products sourced from human or animal tissues, such as plasma derivatives, transfusion blood components and biopharmaceuticals. Although PurePulse attracted $5 million of equity capital from Millipore and Maxwellwas partially offset by gains in ~~March 2002, the venture capital and other equity markets deteriorated since that time and PurePulse was not able to raise additional capital to fund its operations.~~
     In December 2000, we identified PurePulse as not being part of the Company’s strategic focus for the future and adopted a plan to sell all or a part of PurePulse by the end of 2001. However, due to poor market conditions, we were unable to secure a transaction under acceptable terms. The PurePulse segment was classified as a discontinued operation for financial reporting purposes in 2000, and had been carried as such through 2001 and the first three quarters of 2002. In the third quarter, 2002, we recorded non-cash charges of approximately $1.7 million and cash charges of approximately $541,000 for severance and other charges, related to the suspension of PurePulse’s operations.
     ~~In December 2001, PurePulse licensed its~~ ~~PureBright~~ technology to Culligan International Company for certain water purification applications, and in April 2002, it entered into an alliance with Millipore Corporation to market virus inactivation systems to biopharmaceutical manufacturers. The relationship with Millipore has been converted from a co-development and supply relationship to a license that enables Millipore to develop and commercialize ~~PureBright~~ in-flow systems in exchange for future royalties to PurePulse. We plan to monitor these ongoing relationships, and PurePulse will preserve its intellectual property and technology for a possible future sale.
~~Critical Accounting Policies~~
     The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., which requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions. The Company believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity and, as such, management assumptions and conclusions in these areas may significantly impact the results of operations of the Company.
~~Revenue Recognition~~
     For the current year, substantially all of our revenue is derived from the sale of manufactured products directly to customers. In general, revenue is recognized at the time the product is shipped unless specific terms require otherwise. In general, we do not offer discounts and there is no right of return. However in prior years certain continuing and discontinued segments recorded revenue from both long-term and short-term fixed price contracts and cost plus contracts with the U.S. Government directly or through a prime contractor. Those revenues, including estimated profits, were recognized as costs were incurred and included provisions for any anticipated losses. These contracts are subject to rate audits and other audits, which could result in additional revenues or additional losses in excess of estimated provisions.
~~Accounts Receivable~~
     We establish and maintain customer credit limits based on credit checks, analyses of credit-worthiness and payment history. Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due to us from our normal business activities. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect the expected bad debts based on past collection history and specific risks identified in the portfolio.
16

~~Excess and obsolete inventory~~
     We value inventories at lower of cost or market. In assessing the ultimate realization of inventories, we make judgments as to future demand requirements and compare that with current and committed inventory levels. We have recorded significant charges for reserves in recent periods due to changes in market conditions. It is possible that changes in reserves may be required due to changing market conditions, or that judgments as to ultimate realization may be incorrect.
~~Impairment of Goodwill~~
     In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. In addition, we periodically complete independent appraisals of the business segments and compare the fair value to the carrying value. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges.
~~Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets~~
     A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize their benefit, or that future deductibility is uncertain. In general, companies that have had a recent history of operating losses are faced with a difficult burden of proof on their ability to generate sufficient future income within the next two years in order to realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets. In 2001, the Company determined that it was appropriate to record a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets based on its recent history of losses. The deferred tax assets are still available for the Company to use in the future to offset taxable income, which would result in the recognition of a tax benefit and a reduction to the Company’s effective tax rate.
~~Discontinued operations, estimated costs associated with sale of business~~
     In determining the net gain on the sale of businesses included in discontinued operations, we made judgments as to our liability associated with lease obligations. In making these judgments, we assessed commercial real estate markets in several locations and made estimates as to how and when we will be able to either sub-lease, terminate or buy out lease obligations. Changes in these markets may impact our estimates.
~~Results of Operations~~
     In June 2001, the Electronic Components group sold substantially all the assets (except for accounts receivable) and liabilities and business operations of its Sierra division to a subsidiary of Wilson Greatbatch Technologies, Inc. The following table sets forth sales and gross profit for each of the Company’s business segments and, for the nine months ended September 2001, operating results with and without Sierra. The following discussion provides a comparison of results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 2002 and 2001 excluding Sierra operating results.
17


Three Months Ended September

Nine Months Ended September

Nine Months Ended September 2001


2002

2001

2002

2001

(without Sierra)

Electronic Components Group:
Sales    $ 10,898    $ 3,945    $ 20,534    $ 22,860      $ 13,741
Gross Margin    2,608    (934 )    4,858    3,118      959
Gross margin as a percentage of sales    24 %    -24 %    24 %    14 %      7 %
I-Bus/Phoenix Power and Computing Systems:
Sales    $ 5,666    $ 11,072    $ 21,975    $ 39,613      $ 39,613
Gross Margin    98    1,545    (2,000 )    5,902      5,902
Gross margin as a percentage of sales    2 %    14 %    -9 %    15 %      15 %
Consolidated:
Sales    $ 16,564    $ 15,017    $ 42,509    $ 62,473      $ 53,354
Gross Margin    2,706    611    2,858    9,020      6,861
Gross margin as a percentage of sales    16 %    4 %    7 %    14 %      13 %
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative    $ 5,171    $ 4,919    $ 14,766    $ 17,559      $ 16,502
SG&A as a percentage of sales    31 %    33 %    35 %    28 %      31 %
Research and development    2,167    2,946    7,080    8,871      8,613
R&D as a percentage of sales    13 %    20 %    17 %    14 %      16 %
Impairment of long-lived assets    7,628    0    7,628    0      —
Restructuring    922    —      1,734    —        —
Amortization    348    299    348    895      895





Operating loss    $ (13,530 )    $ (7,553 )    $ (28,698 )    $ (18,305 )      $ (19,149 )

~~Sales~~
     ~~Sales for the three months ended September 2002 were $16.6 million, reflecting a $1.6 million, or 10% increase from~~ sales of ~~$15.0 million for the three months ended September 2001. Increased sales were attributable to growth period to period in our Electronic Components Group plus~~BOOSTCAP ultracapacitors. Sales increased from the acquisition of Montena Components in July ~~2002. This increase was offset by sales declines in our I-Bus/Phoenix power~~of 2002, contributing approximately $5.8 million of revenue for the quarter, and ~~computing systems business~~decreased $5.2 million due to the ~~erosion~~divestitures of I-Bus Computing Systems and TeknaSeal in September 2002. Excluding the acquisition and the divestitures, our 2003 sales decreased $3.1 million or 42% compared to the same lines of business in 2002.
9

Total Costs and Expenses
Cost of sales for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 was $8.9 million, a decrease of $2.9 million, or 25%, from the quarter ended March 31, 2002. Cost of sales as a percent of net sales was 87% and 93% in 2003 and 2002, respectively. Although gross profit margins have improved because of better revenue mix and cost containment efforts, they remain depressed because of the ~~telecommunication~~downturn in the general economy and ~~other capital equipment~~industrial markets served by the Company. This has resulted in ~~2002 that I-Bus/Phoenix served. Sales for the nine months ended September 2002 were $42.5 million, reflecting a $10.8 million, or 20% decrease from sales~~inventory charges of ~~$53.4~~$0.5 million for the ~~nine months~~current quarter and under-utilized production facilities.
Selling, General and Administrative (SG&A) expenses for the quarter ended ~~September 2001.~~March 31, 2003 were $4.0 million, a decrease of $0.7 million, or 14%, from the quarter ended March 31, 2002. SG&A as a percent of net sales was 40% and 37% in 2003 and 2002, respectively. During the current quarter, the Company recorded $0.5 million in charges related to reserves against loans made to a former subsidiary and other accruals mainly for severance, which increased current quarter SG&A expenses. SG&A as a percent of sales has increased because of these charges and higher third party commission expenses.
Research and development (R&D) expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 were $1.3 million, a decrease of $1.4 million, or 51%, from the quarter ended March 31, 2002. The ~~decline in sales period to period in our Electronic Components Group was~~decrease is mainly attributable to the sale of I-Bus Computing Systems. R&D as a percent of net sales was 13% and 21% in 2003 and 2002, respectively.
Other deductions (credits) net for the ~~Sierra division in June 2001,~~quarter ended March 31, 2003 were a credit of $0.2 million, which was partially offset by the acquisition of Montena Components in July 2002 and increased sales of other electronic components. The decline in sales period to period by I-Bus/Phoenix reflects the deterioration of the telecommunication and other capital equipment markets.
     In 2002, we have seen our customers react to the generally poor domestic and global economic environment by delaying the developments and introduction of new end products. Such delays negatively impact our business because most of our components and systems are part of our customers’ end products.
     ~~Sales within each of our continuing business segments were as follows:~~
     ~~Electronic Components Group~~~~. Sales for the three months ended September 2002 were $10.9 million, reflecting a $7 million increase or 176%~~essentially unchanged from the ~~prior year period due~~quarter ended March 31, 2002. In the Company’s second fiscal quarter of 2002, it acquired the subsidiary shares that it did not already own and, therefore, no longer records amounts related to ~~$2.4~~minority shareholders. In the first fiscal quarter of 2003, the Company recorded a $0.2 million higher sales of microelectronics for satellites and $4.9 million from Montena Components which was acquired in July 2002. Sales for the nine months ended September 2002 were $20.5 million reflecting a $6.8 million increase, or 49%,gain related to contingent consideration received from the ~~prior year period excluding sales~~sale of ~~$9.1 million from the Sierra division,~~TeknaSeal, which was sold in ~~June 2001. The acquisition~~the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter of ~~Montena~~2002. Interest (
18

~~Components accounted for $4.9 million of the increase, with the balance due primarily to higher sales of microelectronics.~~
     ~~I-Bus/Phoenix Power and Computing Systems~~~~. Sales~~income) expense, net for the ~~three months~~quarter ended ~~September~~March 31, 2003 was a credit of $27 thousand compared to an expense of $27 thousand for the quarter ended March 31, 2002. During 2002, ~~were $5.7 million, reflecting a $5.2 million decrease, or 50%~~the Company used proceeds from the ~~prior year period due~~sale of businesses to $3.4 million lower sales of power systems and $2.1 million lower sales of computing system due to poor market conditions for telecommunication and other capital equipment. Sales for the nine months ended September 2002 were $22 million, reflecting a $17.6 million, or 45%, decrease from the prior year period due to poor market conditions for telecommunication and other capital equipment. Reduced sales of power systems accounted for $8.6 million of this decreasepay down debt and the ~~remaining $9~~excess was invested in high quality short-term marketable investments.
Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations Before Taxes
Losses from continuing operations before taxes was $3.8 million and $6.2 million in the quarters ended March 31 2003 and 2002, respectively.
High Reliability segment losses were $2.5 million in 2003 compared to $3.0 million in 2002. The change was due to ~~lower computing system sales.~~
     ~~In September 2002, we sold the computing business of our I-Bus/Phoenix subsidiary~~an improved revenue mix and ~~we are in the process of integrating the power systems products from I-Bus/Phoenix with our Electronic Components Group. This integration will be completed~~significant cost reductions in the Company’s ~~fourth quarter.~~
~~Gross Margin~~
     In the three months ended September 2002, we had a gross margin of $2.7 million, or 16% of sales, compared to a gross margin of $0.6 million, or 4% of sales, in the three months ended September 2001. In the nine months ended September 2002, gross margin was $2.9 million, or 7%, of sales, as compared to gross margin of $6.9 million, or 13%, of sales in the nine months ended September 2001.
     During 2002, we made substantial improvements to virtually all aspects of our supply chain management and factory operations. These improvements, together with improved sales mix, contributed to the improvement period to period in gross margins realized by our Electronic Components Group. Margins were negatively impacted and continue to be negatively impacted by excess factory capacity. In our third quarter of 2002, we announced plans by the end of 2002 to consolidate our power systems business from I-Bus/Phoenix to the Electronic Components Group production facility in San Diego ~~which will improve factory utilization.~~
     Gross margins at I-Bus/Phoenix were negatively impacted in 2002 by declining sales and, therefore, increasing excess production capacity. Also, gross margins were negatively impacted by inventory reserve charges and severance expense associated with excess and obsolete inventory and production workforce reductions.
     ~~Gross margins within each of our continuing business segments were as follows:~~
     ~~Electronic Components Group~~. In the three months ended September 2002, gross margin in the Electronic Components segment increased by $3.5 million to $2.6 million from $(0.9) million in the three months ended September 2001. This reflects an increase in gross margin as a percentage of sales to 24% in the three months ended September 2002, from (24%) in the prior year period. Excluding sales from Sierra which was sold in June 2001, in the nine months ended September 2002, gross margin increased by $3.9 million, or 410%, to $4.9 million from $1.0 million in the nine months ended September 2001. As a percentage of sales, gross margin increase to 24% in the nine months ended September 2002 from 7% in the prior year period. The increase in gross margin as a percentage of sales mainly is attributable to improved sales mix and improvements in virtually all aspects of our supply chain management and factory operations. ~~Margins remain negatively impacted by excess production capacity.~~
     ~~I-Bus/Phoenix Power and Computing Systems~~. In the three months ended September 2002, gross margin in the I-Bus/Phoenix Power and Computing Systems segment decreased by $1.4 million to $0.1 million from $1.5 in the three months ended September 2001. This reflects a decrease in gross margin as a percentage of sales to 2% in the three months ended September 2002 from 14% in the prior year period. Gross margin and gross margin as a percentage of sales were negatively impacted by excess production capacity attributable to significantly lower sales revenue. In the nine months ended September 2002, gross margin decreased to $(2.0) million from $5.9 million in the nine months ended September 2001. As a percentage of sales, gross margin decreased to (9)% in the nine months ended September 2002 from 15% in the prior year period. Gross margin and gross margin as a percentage of sales for the nine months ended September 2002 were negatively impacted by $3 million inventory reserve charge and severance expenses in the second quarter as well as high levels of excess production capacity.
19

~~Operating Expenses~~
     In the third quarter of 2002, we took actions to reduce general and administrative expenses. We intend to give funding priority to research and development and sales and marketing over general and administrative needs.
     ~~In the three months ended September 2002, our selling, general and administrative expenses increased $0.3 million, or 5%, to $5.2 million from $4.9 million in the three months ended September 2001.~~ The acquisition of Montena Components ~~accounted for $1.1~~contributed $0.1 million ofto the ~~increase,~~year-to-year change.
The Winding Equipment segment, which was ~~partially offset by reductions~~part of our acquisition of Montena Components, recorded a loss of $0.2 million. The loss was due to a significant amount of relatively low profitability sales to customers in ~~general and administrative expenses~~China.
I-Bus Computing Systems, which was disposed of in ~~the three months ended September 2002. As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased to 32% in the three months ended~~ September 2002, ~~from 33% in~~recorded losses of $2.7 million for the ~~prior period. In~~quarter ended March 31 2002. The loss of $0.1 million for the ~~nine months~~quarter ended ~~September 2002, our selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $1.6 million or 10%~~March 31 2003 relates mainly to ~~$14.9 million from $16.5 million in the prior period. As~~ a ~~percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased~~reserve established for amounts advanced to ~~35% in the nine months ended September 2002, from 31% in the prior period. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales is attributable to lower sales.~~I-Bus Corporation.
~~The write down of impaired assets consists of $5.3 million of goodwill associated with the computing systems business,~~
TeknaSeal, which was sold ~~during the third quarter and $2.3 million of Maxwell Technologies assets that supported the computing systems business.~~
     ~~Restructuring costs recorded~~ in 2002 relate to a restructuring plan for the I-Bus/Phoenix power and computing systems that was initiated in the Company’s second fiscal quarter and additionally restructuring charges recorded in our third quarter in order to facilitate the sale of the computing business of I-Bus/Phoenix.
     In the 2002 period, amortization consists of amortization of backlog associated with the acquisition of Montena Components. Amortization of $0.3 million and $1.0 million for the three months and nine months ended September 2001 was not recorded in the current year due to the implementation of a new accounting pronouncement, which eliminates the requirement to amortize goodwill. The remaining intangible balance associated with Montena’s backlog will be fully amortized in the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter.
     Our research and development expenses reflect internally funded research and development programs. Research and development expenses were $2.1 million and $7.1 million, or 13% and 17% of sales, for the three and nine months ended September 2002 ~~as compared to $2.9 million and $8.9 million, or 20% and 14%~~generated earnings of sales, in the three and nine months ended September 2001. Beginning in our fourth quarter 2002, our research and development activity will be focused on power electronics, with an emphasis on our ultracapacitor and high voltage capacitor technology, and on microelectronics, with an emphasis on radiation shielding technology, memory products and single board computers for space applications. The central focus of all of our research and development programs is to develop proprietary technology that supports our strategy to deliver ultra high reliability products.
~~Interest Expense~~
     ~~Interest expense was $0.1 million and~~ $0.3 million in the ~~three and nine months~~quarter ended September 2002 compared to $0.1 million and $1.2 million in the three and nine months ended September 2001. The decreased interest expense relates to lower borrowing levels in the current year as the Company repaid its outstanding obligations under a bank line of credit from the proceeds of the sale of the Sierra and Government Systems divisions.March 2002.
Provision (Credit) ~~for~~For Income Taxes
The ~~tax provision for the three months ended September 2002 reflects the recording of Swiss income taxes on income from Montena Components. Offsetting this provision is a~~ credit for income taxes for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 was $14 thousand compared to $0.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2002. The credit recorded in 2002 was related to a ~~U.S.~~ federal tax refund for taxes paid in ~~2001 that~~2001.
10

Discontinued Operations
Discontinued Operations are ~~now recoverable due to~~comprised of a ~~change in tax law.~~
~~Minority Interest in Net Loss of Subsidiaries~~
     Minority interest in net loss of subsidiaries was $241,000 for the nine months ended September 2002 compared to $282,000 and $86,000 for the three and nine months ended September 2001, respectively. Minority interest was extinguished in April 2002 duecharge related to the ~~consolidation of the subsidiary ownership into equity of Maxwell.~~
20

~~Income (loss) from Continuing Operations~~
     As a result of the primary factors discussed above, the loss from continuing operations was ($20.8) million and ($35.2) million for the three and nine months ended September 2002, respectively, compared to a loss of ($6.9) and income of $10.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 2001, respectively.
~~Discontinued Operations~~
     ~~Our discontinued operations since the beginning of 2001 have been comprised of our defense contracting business,~~Company’s Government Systems Division, which was sold in ~~early~~ 2001, and ~~our~~a credit related to its PurePulse subsidiary, whose operations were suspended in ~~September~~ 2002. ~~Total loss from discontinued operations~~The charge of $0.7 million was ~~$2.8 million and $4.4 million~~due to a change in the ~~three and nine months ended September 2002, compared to $3.5 million and $0.8~~estimated liability for a certain continuing lease obligation. The credit was $0.2 million for ~~the three and nine months ended September 2001.~~
     ~~In September 2002, our PurePulse subsidiary suspended operations and we recorded non-cash charges of approximately $1.7 million and~~ cash ~~charges of approximately $0.5 million for severance and other charges.~~
     In March 2001, we sold the assets of our defense contracting business in separate transactions with two buyers, for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $20.7 million. Of the total purchase price, approximately $9.5 million was received in cash in March 2001, an additional $9.8 million was received in cash in April 2001, and the remaining $1.4 million was received in September 2001 following the expiration of holdback periods for certain indemnifications and other contingencies provided for in the sales agreements. The buyers assumed certain liabilities and all ongoing contractual obligations of the business and hired most of the employees of the business. We retained certain assets and liabilities of the business, including estimated amounts provided at closing for the expenses of the transaction and the net costs of winding up any remaining activities of the business. We recorded a gain, net of tax, of approximately $3.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2001, representing the net gain on the disposition of the assets and the net income from the ~~operations~~sale of ~~this discontinued business.~~certain remaining equipment inventory.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash used by operating activities in the ~~nine months~~quarter ended ~~September 2002~~March 31, 2003, was approximately ~~$10.8~~$0.8 million, as compared to ~~$16.9~~$5.0 million in the ~~nine months~~quarter ended ~~September, 2001.~~March 31 2002. In February 2003, we received a non-refundable payment of $3 million from YEC, our BOOSTCAP ultracapacitor alliance partner in China, which has been classified as deferred revenue. Cash used in discontinued operations in the ~~current year,~~quarter ended March 31, 2003 was $0.3 million and consisted mainly of payments for residual lease obligations of PurePulse and the ~~use of cash primarily was attributable to operating losses.~~Government Systems Division. Capital expenditures infor the ~~nine months~~quarters ended ~~September~~March 31, 2003 and 2002 ~~and 2001~~ were ~~$1.6~~$0.4 million and ~~$4.9~~$0.5 million, respectively. ~~Cash of $2.6 million was used in the Company’s third fiscal quarter as part of the purchase price~~Capital expenditures for ~~Montena Components.~~
     During 2001 and 2002, the Company financed operating losses with term debt, as described under the heading “New Bank Credit Agreement” below, and the sale of non-strategic businesses. In the year ended December 31, 2001, we received $46.9 million and $20.7 million of cash in connection with, respectively, the sale of our Sierra and Government Systems divisions. These funds were used2003 are not expected to pay down debt of $22.8 million and to fund continuing and discontinued operations. On the first day of our fourth fiscal quarter of 2002, we sold our TeknaSeal division for $5.5 million in cash of which $1 million is held in an escrow account and will be paid upon TeknaSeal achieving revenue benchmarks. We used a portion of these proceeds to payexceed $2.8 million, which is approximately equal to ~~Comerica Bank~~our annual depreciation and ~~reduced the outstanding term loan to $3.0 million.~~amortization charges.
~~Montena Components~~
Maxwell Technologies, SA requires advances from customers for certain product lines and issues bank guarantees that give the customer the right to receive back the advance if the product is not delivered by a specific date. As of the end of ~~our third fiscal quarter,~~March 31, 2003, we had issued guarantees of ~~$1.1~~$0.3 million related to these product arrangements, most of which we expect to ship to customers in ~~our fourth fiscal quarter.~~the second quarter of 2003.
~~During~~
Assets held for sale consist of the quarter ended September 2002, we suspended the operations of PurePulse, sold the applied computing business operations of I-Bus/Phoenix and started consolidating power systems business and corporate headquarters into our leased facilityCompany-owned building in San Diego, which ~~contains our Electronic Components Group. We also decided to offer for sale our 85,000 sq ft owned facility that~~ housed the former I-Bus/Phoenix ~~North American operations~~U.S. production and administration. ~~These actions, combined with~~We expect to sell the ~~acquisition of Montena are consistent with our strategy to focus on high value, high~~
21

~~reliability power and microelectronic products and to structure~~facility during the ~~Company’s operations to be self-supporting on product revenues.~~ current fiscal year.

At present, we expect that future cash flows from operations ~~will be positive and,~~ combined with our existing cash balance and net proceeds from assets held for sale will be adequate to fund our capital equipment and working capital requirements and operating losses for more than the next twelve months. ~~We also expect within the next twelve months to complete the sale of our owned facility in San Diego, which will add significantly to our cash reserves.~~

Although we believe we have adequate cash on hand and future cash flows to meet our ~~working capital and capital~~cash requirements, ~~a decrease in~~continued revenues at current depressed levels would cause continued losses and negative cash flows from operations. Therefore, the Company may need to seek additional financing in the future. Although we cannot predict with any certainty as to if or when we might need additional financing, we believe such financing would not be required for the next twelve months. If the Company needs additional financing, there can be no assurance that such financing will be available on acceptable terms or at all. In addition, if the Company does not generate sufficient cash flow from operations in line with its current forecasts, the Company may have to initiate measures to raise cash through asset sales, additional debt or equity issuances and/or curtail operations. Failure to achieve expected cash flows or, if necessary, to obtain additional debt or equity investments would have a material adverse effect on the Company.
~~New~~ Bank Credit Agreement
Our ~~Montena Components~~Maxwell Europe subsidiary has a bank credit agreement with two Swiss banks. Borrowings under the credit agreement bear interest at the bank’s prime rate plus 1.0%. ~~Under the credit agreement, we~~The interest rate was 4.5% at March 31, 2002. We also are eligible to borrow fixed term loans at LIBOR rate plus 2.5% with repayment terms extending beyond one month from the date of funding. Borrowings under the credit agreement are secured by the assets of ~~Montena Components.~~Maxwell Europe and there are no loan covenants. As of ~~September 29, 2002,~~March 31, 2003, there was ~~approximately~~ $0.3 million outstanding under the credit agreement, ~~and $1.8~~$0.3 million assigned to letters of guarantee and an available borrowing balance of ~~$1.3~~$2.9 million.

In February 2001, we entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Comerica ~~Bank — California.~~Bank-California. The ~~agreement,~~Loan and Security Agreement, as amended, consists of a term loan secured by a deed of trust as well as certain other collateral. The term loan bears interest, at our option, at the bank’s reference rate plus .5%, or cost of funds plus 2.25%. The interest rate was 4.75% at March 31, 2003. The principal is amortized monthly over 20 years with the balance due December 31, 2004. We may prepay the term loan at any ~~time, and all amounts borrowed are due on December 31, 2004. At September 29, 2002, $5.8 million was outstanding under the term loan.~~time. We ~~prepaid $2.8 million of the term loan on November 13, 2002 and~~ currently have an outstanding principal balance of ~~$3.0~~$2.8 million.

The ~~agreement~~Loan and Security Agreement, as amended, contains covenants restricting our ability to, among other things:
•
~~Sell or dispose of any part of our business, other than sales in the ordinary course of business, that exceeds $2 million.~~
•
~~Engage in any business other than the business currently engaged in.~~
•
~~Merge or consolidate or acquire any other businesses unless we use our own equity and meet the financial covenants on a combined pro-forma basis.~~
•
~~Incur any other debt except for up to $5 million incurred by foreign subsidiaries and up to $2 million of other debt.~~
•
Make any investments except investments in certain marketable debt securities guaranteed by the United States or any federal or state agency, certain commercial paper, certificates of deposit and bank money market accounts, investments in foreign subsidiaries not to exceed $2 million and up to $2 million of other investments.
•
~~Pay dividends.~~
•
~~Incur liens except for liens securing amounts under the agreement.~~

11

•                  Sell or dispose of any part of our business, other than sales in the ordinary course of business, where sales proceeds exceed $2 million.
•                  Engage in any business other than the businesses currently engaged in.
•                  Merge or consolidate or acquire any other businesses unless we use our own equity and meet the financial covenants on a combined pro-forma basis.
•                  Incur any other debt except for up to $5 million incurred by foreign subsidiaries and up to $2 million of other debt.
•                  Make any investments except investments in certain marketable debt securities guaranteed by the United States or any federal or state agency, certain commercial paper, certificates of deposit and bank money market accounts, investments in foreign subsidiaries not to exceed $2 million and up to $2 million of other investments.
•                  Pay dividends.
•                  Incur liens except for liens securing amounts under the Loan and Security Agreement.
The ~~agreement~~Loan and Security Agreement, as amended, also requires us to maintain a minimum tangible net worth of $24 ~~million to remain in compliance.~~
22

million.

As of the filing date of this Form 10-Q we are in compliance with all covenants.
~~Minority Equity Interests in Subsidiaries and Subsidiary Option Programs~~Net Liabilities of Discontinued Operations
In January 2002, we adopted a plan to complete merger transactions between Maxwell and our Electronic Components Group subsidiary and our I-Bus/Phoenix subsidiary whereby all of the minority shareholdings and options in such subsidiaries would be converted to shares and options of Maxwell. On April 15, 2002, these merger transactions resulted in the issuance of 565,000 common shares of Maxwell and options to purchase 520,000 common shares of Maxwell. In February 2002, PacifiCorp Energy Ventures, Inc., the largest minority shareholder in the Electronic Components Group, exchanged its preferred shares of the Electronic Components Group for 518,000 common shares of Maxwell pursuant to its right under the original investment agreement.
PurePulse, which is classified as discontinued operations, has minority equity ~~investors. These~~ investors are former strategic partners associated with relationships established in the past, former employees who were issued shares when PurePulse originally was incorporated and former employees who have exercised stock options in that entity.. As of ~~September 2002,~~March 31 2003, minority investors owned approximately ~~18.73%~~18% of the outstanding stock of ~~PurePulse.~~PurePulse with an accounting basis of $1.3 million. The remaining liability is comprised mainly of a certain lease obligation of the Government Systems Division.
Critical Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., which requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions. The Company believes that of its significant accounting policies, the following may involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity and, as such, management assumptions and conclusions in these areas may significantly impact the results of operations of the Company.
Revenue Recognition
For the current year, substantially all of our revenue is derived from the sale of manufactured products directly to customers. In general, revenue is recognized at the time the product is shipped unless specific terms require otherwise. Ingeneral, we do not offer discounts and there is no right of return. However in prior years certain continuing and discontinued segments recorded revenue from both long-term and short-term fixed price contracts and cost plus contracts with the U.S. Government directly or through a prime contractor. Those revenues, including estimated profits, were recognized as costs were incurred and included provisions for any anticipated losses. These contracts are subject to rate audits and other audits, which could result in additional losses in excess of estimated provisions.
Accounts Receivable
We establish and maintain customer credit limits based on credit checks, analyses of credit-worthiness and payment history. Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due to us from our normal business activities. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to reflect the expected bad debts based on past collection history
12

and specific risks identified in the portfolio. It is possible that changes in allowance may be required due to changing market conditions, or that judgments as to ultimate realization may be incorrect.
Excess and Obsolete Inventory
We value inventories at the lower of cost or market. In assessing the ultimate realization of inventories, we make judgments as to future demand requirements and compare that with current and committed inventory levels. The markets for the Company’s products are extremely competitive and are characterized by rapid technological change, new product development, product obsolescence and evolving industry standards. In addition price competition is intense and significant price erosion generally occurs over the life of a product. We have recorded significant charges for reserves in recent periods due to changes in market conditions. It is possible that changes in reserves may be required due to changing market conditions, or that judgments as to ultimate realization may be incorrect.
Assets Held for Sale and Remaining Lease Obligations
The building formerly occupied by I-Bus/Phoenix, Inc., which is classified as held for sale, is carried at historical cost. The Company believes that, based on analysis prepared by the listing agent, the fair value is in excess of the carrying value. Changes in market conditions or other factors may ultimately result in realizing less than the carrying value.
Also, the Company has estimated the liability associated with a certain lease obligation recorded in Discontinued Operations (see discussion of Discontinued Operations). We revised the estimate from $0.4 million to $1.1 million during the first quarter of 2003. The total remaining obligation, which terminates in April 2006, is approximately $1.5 million. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to conclude this lease obligation for the amount that we have accrued.
Loss in the Sale of the I-Bus Computing Systems Business
The Company fully reserved for the $7 million note received in exchange for the I-Bus Computing Systems business due to the uncertainty as to its collectability. Future collections would result in recognizing gains.
Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill
Long-lived assets such as property, plant and equipment and other intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events and changes in business circumstances indicate the carrying value of the long-lived asset may not be recoverable. If the Company determines that the carrying value of the long-lived asset may not be recoverable, a permanent impairment charge is recorded for the amount by which the carrying value of the long-lived asset exceeds its fair value. Management believes that the estimates of fair value are reasonable; however changes in business circumstances or estimates of cash flows and fair value could materially impact reported results.
In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, which is completed annually, we make assumptions regarding future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value. In addition, we periodically have independent appraisals of the business segments performed and compare the fair value to the carrying value. If these estimates or their related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges. Goodwill associated with the I-Bus Computing Systems was written off in conjunction with the disposition of that business. The remaining goodwill is mainly attributable to the acquisition of Montena Components, which was completed in July 2002. Our analysis, which was completed early in the fourth quarter of 2002, was based on the determination that circumstances since the recently completed acquisition of Montena had not materially changed and the Company’s fair value at that date was significantly in excess of the carrying value of its assets including goodwill.
Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets
A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not that these items will either expire before the Company is able to realize their benefit, or that future deductibility is uncertain. In general,
13

companies that have had a recent history of operating losses are faced with a difficult burden of proof on their ability to generate sufficient future income within the next two years in order to realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets. In 2001, the Company determined that it was appropriate to record a valuation allowance, which continued in 2002 and 2003 against its deferred tax assets based on its recent history of losses. The deferred tax assets are still available for the Company to use in the future to offset taxable income, which would result in the recognition of a tax benefit and a reduction to the Company’s effective tax rate.
Inflation and Changes in Prices
Generally, we have been able to increase prices to offset inflation-related cost increases in our continuing operations.
Forward-Looking Statements
To the extent that the above discussion goes beyond historical information and indicates results or developments which we plan or expect to achieve, these forward-looking statements are identified by the use of terms such as “expected,” “anticipates,” “believes,” ~~“plans”~~plans and the like. Readers are cautioned that such future results are uncertain and could be affected by a variety of factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expected, and such differences could be material.

Some of the risks and uncertainties that could cause the forward-looking statements to be inaccurate are summarized below:
•
•Further decline in the domestic and global economy that can delay the development and introduction by our customers’ end products that incorporate our components and systems.
•
~~Success in the introduction and marketing of new products into existing and new markets.~~
•
~~Ability to manufacture existing and new products in volumes demanded by our customers and at competitive prices with adequate gross margins.~~
•
~~Market success of the products offered by the Company’s customers into which our products are incorporated.~~
•
~~Ability in growing markets to grow the Company’s market share relative to its competitors.~~
•
~~Success in meeting cost reduction goals in the restructuring and reorganizing of our businesses.~~
•
~~Ability to successfully integrate our businesses with operations of acquired businesses.~~
•
~~Ability to finance the growth of businesses with internal resources or through outside financing at reasonable rates.~~
23

•                  Success in the introduction and marketing of new products into existing and new markets.
•                  Ability to manufacture existing and new products in volumes demanded by our customers and at competitive prices with adequate gross margins.
•                  Market success of the products offered by the Company’s customers into which our products are incorporated.
•                  Ability in growing markets to grow the Company’s market share relative to its competitors.
•                  Success in meeting cost reduction goals in the restructuring and reorganizing of our businesses.
•                  Ability to successfully integrate our businesses with operations of acquired businesses.
•                  Ability to finance the growth of businesses with internal resources or through outside financing at reasonable rates.
We undertake no obligation to revise these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect future events or circumstances. You are referred to the “Risk Factors” section in Item 1 of ~~our~~Part I of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2001~~2002 for a more detailed discussion of certain of those factors.
New Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 146 “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (SFAS No. 146). This statement supercedes Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) issue No. 94-3 “Liabilities Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)”. SFAS No. 146 requires that a liability for cost associated with an exit or disposal activity be recognized at the date an entity commits to an exit plan. SFAS No. 146 also establishes that the liability should initially be measured and recorded at fair value. The provisions of SFAS No. 146 is effective for any exit and disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002.
14

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation- Transition and Disclosure- an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123” (SFAS No. 148). This statement amends SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock Based Compensation” (SFAS No. 123) to provide alternative methods of voluntarily transitioning to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. SFAS No. 148 also amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require disclosure of the method used to account for stock-based employee compensation and the effects of the method on reported results in both annual and interim financial statements. The disclosure provisions were effective for the Company’s year ended December 31, 2002. The Company has not yet completed the final evaluation of the options presented by SFAS No. 148. However, within the next year the company expects to reach a determination of whether and, if so, when to change the Company’s existing accounting for stock-based compensation to the fair value method in accordance with the transition alternatives of SFAS No. 148.
. In November 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 (“FIN 45”), Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others. FIN 45 requires that a liability be recorded in the guarantor’s balance sheet upon issuance of a guarantee. In addition, FIN 45 requires certain disclosures about each of the entity’s guarantees. The Company will apply the recognition provisions of FIN 45 to any guarantees issued after December 31, 2002.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We have not entered into or invested in any instruments that are subject to market risk, except as follows:

We face exposure to financial market risks, including adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates and changes in interest rates. These exposures may change over time and could have a material adverse impact on our financial results.

Our primary foreign currency exposure ~~has been~~is related to our subsidiary in Switzerland. Maxwell, SA has Euro and local currency (Swiss Franc) revenue and local currency operating ~~expenses~~expenses. Changes in ~~Europe. As a result of our international operations, changes in foreign~~these currency exchange rates impact the ~~United States~~U.S. dollar amount of ~~our~~ revenue and expenses. We do not hedge our currency exposures.

At ~~September 29, 2002,~~March 31, 2003, we had ~~$5.8~~$2.8 million outstanding related to variable rate U.S dollar denominated-term debt. The carrying value of these short-term borrowings approximates fair value due to the short maturities of these instruments. Assuming a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the interest rate, annual interest expense on our short-term borrowings, if the amount outstanding remained unchanged, would increase by approximately ~~$30,000.~~$0.3 million.

We invest excess cash in debt instruments of the ~~U.S~~U.S. Government and its agencies, high-quality corporate issuers and money market accounts. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. Current policies do not allow the use of interest rate derivative instruments to manage exposure to interest rate changes. A third party manages approximately ~~$7.8~~$5.7 million of the investment portfolio under guidelines approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. The balance of our cash is invested in money market accounts with banks.
15

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Within 90 days prior to the date of this report, we completed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective with respect to timely communicating to them all material information required to be disclosed in this report as it related to the Company and its subsidiaries.

There have been no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect the internal controls subsequent to the date this evaluation was completed.
24

16

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
~~Item 1.~~
~~Legal Proceedings~~
     ~~None.~~
~~Item 2.~~
~~Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds~~
~~On July 5, 2002~~
Item 1.    Legal Proceedings
                None
Item 2.    Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds
                None
Item 3.    Defaults Upon Senior Securities
                None
Item 4.    Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Registrant’s 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 8, 2003. At the ~~Company issued~~meeting, Richard D. Balanson and José Cortes were elected as Class I directors for a ~~total~~term expiring at the 2006 Annual Meeting of ~~2,250,000~~Shareholders. Directors Mark Rossi and Jean Lavigne continue to serve as Class II directors with terms expiring at the 2004 Annual Meetings of Shareholders and Carl Eibl and Robert Guyett will continue to serve as class III directors with terms expiring at the 2005 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
In addition, the Registrant’s shareholders authorized the issuance of up to 500,000 shares of ~~common stock~~the Company’s Common Stock to Montena, SA, ~~a Swiss corporation, as part~~in accordance with the provisions of an amendment to the ~~consideration for~~Purchase and Barter Agreement through which the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of ~~Montena SA’s subsidiary corporation,~~capital stock of Montena Components Ltd.
The ~~Company’s shares~~following numbers of votes were ~~issued pursuant~~cast “for” and to “withhold authority to vote for” the ~~exemption from registration provided by Regulation S~~election of Richard D. Balanson, elected as Class I director at the Securities and Exchange Commission. Montena SA is a Swiss corporation and the shares issued are considered restricted securities that cannot be resold except under an effective registration statement or pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements.meeting:
~~Item 3.~~For:
~~Defaults Upon Senior Securities~~

~~None.~~10,222,737

Withhold Authority:
~~Item 4.~~
~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~
~~None.~~
~~Item 5.~~
~~Other Information~~
~~None.~~2,245,767

25

The following numbers of votes were cast “for” and to “withhold authority to vote for” the election of José Cortes, elected as Class I director at the meeting:
~~Item 6.~~
~~Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K~~
~~(a) Exhibits~~
~~(99) Certifications~~
~~(a)~~
~~Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~
For:

~~(b)~~
~~Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~
10,972,726

Withhold Authority:
~~(b) The following reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter:~~
1,495,778

The vote on authorization of issuance of up to 500,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock to Montena, SA:
•
~~Form 8-K filed July 19, 2002 reporting the Acquisition of Montena Components, Ltd. and restructuring of I-Bus/Phoenix, Inc.~~
For:

•
~~Amended Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2002 with Financial Statements and Pro Forma Financial~~
8,475,932

~~information relating to the acquisition of Montena Components, Ltd.~~Against:
1,267,642
Abstain:
40,739

Broker non-vote: 2,684,191
Item 5.    Other Information
                None
17

Item 6.    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
3.4
Bylaws of the Registrant as amended to date.
10.45
Amendment Number Six to the Registrant’s 1995 Stock Option Plan
10.46
Services Agreement, dated April 4, 2003, between the Registrant and Carlton J. Eibl.
10.47
Form of Director Indemnity Agreement.
(99)
Certifications
(a)           Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b)          Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b) No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

~~November 13, 2002~~May 14, 2003

/s/ ~~CARLTON J. EIBL~~RICHARD D. BALANSON
Date
~~Carlton J. Eibl,~~Richard D. Balanson,
Chief Executive Officer

~~November 13, 2002~~May 14, 2003

/s/ JAMES A. BAUMKER
Date
James A. Baumker, Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial
and Accounting Officer)
18

CERTIFICATIONS
I, Richard D. Balanson, certify that:
1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxwell Technologies, Inc.;
2.             Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
(a)          designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
(b)         evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
(c)          presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a)              all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b)             any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
May 14, 2003
/s/    RICHARD D. BALANSON
Date
Signature

Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

26

~~CERTIFICATIONS~~
~~I, Carlton J. Eibl, certify that:~~
1.
~~I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxwell Technologies, Inc.;~~
2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
~~(a)~~
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
~~(b)~~
~~evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and~~
~~(c)~~
~~presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;~~
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b)
~~any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and~~
6.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.Title

19

CERTIFICATIONS
I, James A. Baumker, certify that:
1.             I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxwell Technologies, Inc.;
2.             Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.             Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
(a)          designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b)             evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c)              presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a)              all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b)             any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and
6.             The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
~~November 13, 2002~~May 14, 2003

/s/   ~~CARLTON J. EIBL~~ JAMES A. BAUMKER
Date
Signature

~~/s/    Chief Executive Officer~~
~~Title~~
27

~~CERTIFICATIONS~~
~~I, James A. Baumker, certify that:~~
1.
~~I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Maxwell Technologies, Inc.;~~
2.
Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
3.
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
4.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:
~~(a)~~
designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b)
~~evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation Date"); and~~
c)
~~presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;~~
5.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):
a)
all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b)
~~any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and~~
6.
The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

~~November 13, 2002~~ ~~/s/~~   ~~JAMES A. BAUMKER~~
~~Date~~
~~Signature~~
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Title
28
20

Commission File Number 0-10964

Delaware

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 193495-2390133

PART I

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

Item 2.2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

Sales

Total Costs and Expenses

Provision (Credit) forFor Income Taxes

Discontinued Operations

Liquidity and Capital Resources

New Bank Credit Agreement

Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

Accounts Receivable

Excess and Obsolete Inventory

Assets Held for Sale and Remaining Lease Obligations

Loss in the Sale of the I-Bus Computing Systems Business

Long-Lived Assets and Goodwill

Valuation Allowance for Deferred Tax Assets

Inflation and Changes in Prices

Forward-Looking Statements

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

CERTIFICATIONS

			~~Page~~PART I

	~~PART I~~

Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	2
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	24
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	24

	PART II

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	25
Item 2.	Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds	25
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	25
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	25
Item 5.	Other Information	25
Item 6.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	26

					September 29, 2002			December 31, 2001

					(Unaudited)			(Audited)
Assets
Current assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents				$	715		$	13,673
	Short-term investments					7,627			11,886
	Accounts receivable, net					10,095			13,984
	Inventories					12,843			16,605
	Assets held for sale					11,820			—
	Prepaid expenses and other current assets					853			1,031
	Due from related parties					272			—
	Income tax receivable					278			—

				Total current assets		44,503			57,179
	Property, plant and equipment, net					12,130			21,741
	Goodwill and other non-current assets					19,814			6,784

					$	76,447		$	85,704

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
	Accounts payable and accrued liabilities				$	14,828		$	12,159
	Due to related parties					86			—
	Accrued employee compensation					2,091			1,586
	Short-term and current portion of long-term debt					577			300
	Net liabilities of discontinued operations					3,176			1,642
	Liabilities held-for-sale					234			—

			Total current liabilities			20,992			15,687
Long-term debt						5,500			5,700
Minority interest						—			4,586
Stockholders’ equity:
	Common stock					1,370			1,017
	Additional paid-in capital					112,185			84,283
	Notes receivable from executives for stock purchases					—			(897	)
	Accumulated deficit					(63,506	)		(23,859	)
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss					(94	)		(813	)

		Total stockholders’ equity				49,955			59,731

					$	76,447		$	85,704

			Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended

			September 29, 2002			September 30, 2001			September 29, 2002			September 30, 2001

Sales			$	16,564		$	15,017		$	42,509		$	62,473
Cost of sales				13,858			14,406			39,651			53,453

Gross profit				2,706			611			2,858			9,020
Operating expenses:
	Selling, general and administrative			5,171			4,919			14,766			17,559
	Research and development			2,167			2,946			7,080			8,871
	Impairment of long lived assets			7,628			—			7,628			—
	Restructuring charge			922			—			1,734			—
	Amortization expense of intangible assets			348			299			348			895

		Total operating expenses		16,236			8,164			31,556			27,325

Operating loss				(13,530	)		(7,553	)		(28,698	)		(18,305	)
Gain (loss) on sale of business				(7,219	)		—			(7,219	)		39,119
Interest expense				(118	)		(70	)		(310	)		(1,216	)
Interest income and other, net				205			332			629			477

Income (loss) before income taxes and minority interest				(20,662	)		(7,291	)		(35,598	)		20,075
Provision (credit) for income taxes				124			(63	)		(155	)		9,624
Minority interest in net loss of subsidiaries				—			(282	)		(241	)		(86	)

Income (loss) from continuing operations				(20,786	)		(6,946	)		(35,202	)		10,537
Discontinued operations, net of taxes				(2,761	)		(3,498	)		(4,445	)		(779	)

	Net income (loss)		$	(23,547	)	$	(10,444	)	$	(39,647	)	$	9,758

Basic net income (loss) per share:
	Income (loss) from continuing operations		$	(1.53	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(2.99	)	$	1.05
	(Loss) from discontinued operations			(0.20	)		(0.35	)		(0.38	)		(0.08	)

Net income (loss)			$	(1.73	)	$	(1.03	)	$	(3.37	)	$	0.97

Diluted net income (loss) per share:
	Income (loss) from continuing operations		$	(1.53	)	$	(0.68	)	$	(2.99	)	$	0.96
	(Loss) from discontinued operations			(0.20	)		(0.35	)		(0.38	)		(0.07	)

Net income (loss)			$	(1.73	)	$	(1.03	)	$	(3.37	)	$	0.89

Shares used in computing:
Basic net income (loss) per share				13,597			10,160			11,770			10,048

Diluted net income (loss) per share				13,597			10,160			11,770			10,735

	March 31 2003			December 31 2002
	(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4,619		$	3,545
Short-term investments	5,595			7,546
Trade and other accounts receivable, net	6,363			8,530
Inventories	11,584			11,833
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	1,114			1,037
Assets held-for-sale	7,356			7,356

Total current assets	36,631			39,847
Property, plant and equipment, net	11,237			11,653
Other intangible assets, net	2,046			2,009
Goodwill	17,716			17,577
Other non-current assets	295			294
	$	67,925		$	71,380

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	8,294		$	11,508
Deferred revenue	5,098			2,305
Accrued employee compensation	1,900			1,590
Short-term borrowings and current portion of long-term debt	3,484			570
Deferred tax liability	279			272
Liabilities of discontinued operations	2,573			2,326

Total current liabilities	21,628			18,571

Deferred tax liability	183			183
Long-term debt, excluding current portion	—			2,675
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.10 par value per share, 40,000 shares authorized; 13,765 and 13,726 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2003 and December 31, 2002, respectively	1,377			1,373
Additional paid-in capital	112,372			112,255
Accumulated deficit	(68,376		)	(64,015		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	741			338
Total stockholders’ equity	46,114			49,951
	$	67,925		$	71,380

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2003			2002

Sales	$	10,241		$	12,789
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales	8,930			11,842
Selling, general and administrative	4,040			4,691
Research and development	1,307			2,667
Other	(236		)	(214		)
Total costs and expenses	14,041			18,986
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes	(3,800		)	(6,197		)
Provision for income taxes	(14		)	(291		)
Loss from continuing operations	(3,786		)	(5,906		)
Discontinued operations, net of taxes:
Loss from operations	(575		)	(805		)
Gain on disposal	—			—
Net loss from discontinued operations	(575		)	(805		)

Net loss	$	(4,361	)	$	(6,711	)

Basic net loss per share:
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.57	)
Loss from discontinued operations	(0.04		)	(0.08		)
Net loss	$	(0.32	)	$	(0.65	)

Liabilities of discontinued operations
Loss from continuing operations	$	(0.28	)	$	(0.57	)
Loss from discontinued operations	(0.04		)	(0.08		)
Net loss	$	(0.32	)	$	(0.65	)

Shares used in computing:
Basic net loss per share	13,741			10,395
Diluted net loss per share	13,741			10,395

Total acquisition cost:
Cash and stock paid at acquisition	$	20,949
Acquisition related expenses		300

	$	21,249

Allocation to assets and liabilities as follows:
Tangible assets	$	14,813
Assumed liabilities		(9,988	)
Acquired backlog		464
Developed core technology		1,136
Goodwill		14,824

	$	21,249

Pro Forma Results		Nine Months Ended September 2002			Nine Months Ended September 2001

	Revenue	$	52,518		$	78,139
	Loss from continuing operations	$	(34,039	)	$	10,074
	Loss per share	$	(2.67	)	$	0.78

Disposition of I-Bus computing systems assets (in thousands):
	Subordinated note receivable	$	7,000
	Less reserve for note		(7,000	)
	Assets sold net of liabilities assumed by buyer		(6,252	)
	Shutdown costs assumed by Maxwell		(762	)

Net loss on disposition of I-Bus computing systems		$	(7,014	)

Disposition of TeknaSeal assets (in thousands):
	Cash received	$	5,500
	Less amount held in escrow		(1,000	)
	Assets sold net of liabilities assumed by buyer		(1,313	)
	Goodwill associated with TeknaSeal		(2,917	)
	Estimated expenses related to sale		(270	)

Net income on disposition of TeknaSeal		$	—

	September 29, 2002			December 31, 2001

Finished products	$	4,844		$	3,289
Work-in-process		3,252			878
Parts and raw materials		9,376			16,334
Inventory Reserve		(4,629	)		(3,896	)

	$	12,843		$	16,605

	March 31, 2003			December 31, 2002
Inventory:
Finished goods	$	5,352		$	4,495
Work-in-process	2,003			2,130
Raw material and purchased parts	6,830			7,234
Inventory reserve	(2,601		)	(2,026		)
	$	11,584		$	11,833

	Three Months Ended September						Nine Months Ended September

	2002			2001			2002			2001

Net income (loss)	$	(23,547	)	$	(10,444	)	$	(39,647	)	$	9,758
Foreign currency translation adjustments		568			282			692			(19	)
Unrealized gain on securities		17			120			27			120

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(22,962	)	$	(10,042	)	$	(38,928	)	$	9,859

			Additions
	Balance at As of December 31, 2002		Charges to Cost and Expenses		Deductions For Costs Incurred			Deductions For Change in Estimate		Balance at As of March 31, 2003

Accrued Warranty	$	947	$	393	$	(352	)	$	—	$	988

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2003			2002
Net loss	$	(4,361	)	$	(6,711	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	442			(15		)
Unrealized loss on securities	(39		)	(55		)
Comprehensive loss	$	(3,958	)	$	(6,781	)

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2003			2002
Revenue:
High Reliability	$	7,833		$	7,555
Winding Equipment	2,408			—
I-Bus Computing Systems	—			4,139
Sierra and TeknaSeal	—			1,095
Consolidated total	$	10,241		$	12,789

Income (loss):
High Reliability	$	(2,495	)	$	(3,030	)
Winding Equipment	(237		)	—
I-Bus Computing Systems	(114		)	(2,721		)
Sierra and TeknaSeal	—			274
Total segment operating loss	(2,846		)	(5,477		)
Corporate expenses	1,209			934
(Gain) loss on sale of businesses	(228		)	—
Minority interest	—			(241		)
Interest and other, net	(27		)	27

Loss from continuing operations before income taxes	$	(3,800	)	$	(6,197	)

	Severance Costs for Involuntary Employee Terminations			Costs to Exit Certain Contractual and Lease Obligations		Moving and Other Costs Related to Consolidation of Facilities		Total Restructuring Charges
Balance December 31, 2002	$	304		$	47	$	—	$	351
Reserves established:
Utilization of reserves:
Cash	(151		)	—		—		(151		)

Balance March 31, 2003	$	153		$	47	$	—	$	200

	2003	2002
Risk free interest rate	3.3	3.3
Dividend yield	0	0
Volatility	50.3	68.4
Weighted average expected life	5 years	5 years

	Useful Lives	Gross Carrying Value		Accumulated Amortization		Net Carrying Value

Developed core technology	10 years	$	1,148	$	30	$	1,118
Acquired backlog	6 months		464		348		116

		$	1,612	$	378	$	1,234

	•	In July 2002, we acquired Montena Components, a Swiss manufacturer and marketer of ultracapacitors, high-voltage capacitors and battery and capacitor winding equipment, for $3 million in cash and 2.25 million shares of Maxwell common stock. This acquisition brought to Maxwell additional power business focused on high reliability components and additional design and production capability to position Maxwell as a reliable, global supplier. Montena Components is located in Rossens, Switzerland, near major automotive and industrial development and manufacturing centers in Germany, France and Italy.

	•	In September 2002, we suspended the operations of our PurePulse subsidiary, which had been developing pulsed light purification systems, while preserving PurePulse intellectual property for a future sale.

	•	On September 29, 2002, we sold the computing systems business of our I-Bus/Phoenix subsidiary for $7 million in debt and certain other consideration. Although the computing systems business has a strategic focus on high reliability, high availability computers, the markets for such systems, particularly telecommunications deteriorated so dramatically in 2002 that we no longer could be confident of near term growth for that business.

	•	On September 30, 2002, we sold our non-core TeknaSeal glass-to-metal seals business in Minneapolis, Minnesota, in a transaction that is expected generate net proceeds of approximately $5 million in cash.

	•	During the third quarter, we began the integration of the power systems business of I-Bus/Phoenix into our Electronic Components Group. Our existing power systems address the high reliability and high quality power needs of our medical imaging and industrial systems customers. Also, new power systems emerging from our research and development incorporate our ultracapacitor and other proprietary power electronics technology that address high reliability power back up applications in the industrial market.

•	~~Ultracapacitors for electrical energy storage and delivery of peak power for a variety of applications.~~

	~~High-voltage grading and coupling capacitors used in electric utility infrastructure, high-voltage laboratories and other applications involving transport and distribution of electrical energy.~~

•	~~Radiation-shielded microelectronics, including integrated circuits, power modules, memory modules and single board computers for aerospace and military applications.~~

•	~~Automated accelerated life test systems (AARTS) for RF and DC components used in applications requiring extremely high reliability.~~

•	~~Winding machines and automated assembly lines used to manufacture capacitors and batteries.~~

	Three Months Ended September						Nine Months Ended September						Nine Months Ended September 2001
	2002			2001			2002			2001			(without Sierra)
Electronic Components Group:
Sales	$	10,898		$	3,945		$	20,534		$	22,860		$	13,741
Gross Margin		2,608			(934	)		4,858			3,118			959
Gross margin as a percentage of sales		24	%		-24	%		24	%		14	%		7	%
I-Bus/Phoenix Power and Computing Systems:
Sales	$	5,666		$	11,072		$	21,975		$	39,613		$	39,613
Gross Margin		98			1,545			(2,000	)		5,902			5,902
Gross margin as a percentage of sales		2	%		14	%		-9	%		15	%		15	%
Consolidated:
Sales	$	16,564		$	15,017		$	42,509		$	62,473		$	53,354
Gross Margin		2,706			611			2,858			9,020			6,861
Gross margin as a percentage of sales		16	%		4	%		7	%		14	%		13	%
Operating expenses
Selling, general and administrative	$	5,171		$	4,919		$	14,766		$	17,559		$	16,502
SG&A as a percentage of sales		31	%		33	%		35	%		28	%		31	%
Research and development		2,167			2,946			7,080			8,871			8,613
R&D as a percentage of sales		13	%		20	%		17	%		14	%		16	%
Impairment of long-lived assets		7,628			0			7,628			0			—
Restructuring		922			—			1,734			—			—
Amortization		348			299			348			895			895

Operating loss	$	(13,530	)	$	(7,553	)	$	(28,698	)	$	(18,305	)	$	(19,149	)

	•	~~Sell or dispose of any part of our business, other than sales in the ordinary course of business, that exceeds $2 million.~~

	•	~~Engage in any business other than the business currently engaged in.~~

	•	~~Merge or consolidate or acquire any other businesses unless we use our own equity and meet the financial covenants on a combined pro-forma basis.~~

	•	~~Incur any other debt except for up to $5 million incurred by foreign subsidiaries and up to $2 million of other debt.~~

	•	Make any investments except investments in certain marketable debt securities guaranteed by the United States or any federal or state agency, certain commercial paper, certificates of deposit and bank money market accounts, investments in foreign subsidiaries not to exceed $2 million and up to $2 million of other investments.

	•	~~Pay dividends.~~

	•	~~Incur liens except for liens securing amounts under the agreement.~~

	•	•Further decline in the domestic and global economy that can delay the development and introduction by our customers’ end products that incorporate our components and systems.

	•	~~Success in the introduction and marketing of new products into existing and new markets.~~

	•	~~Ability to manufacture existing and new products in volumes demanded by our customers and at competitive prices with adequate gross margins.~~

	•	~~Market success of the products offered by the Company’s customers into which our products are incorporated.~~

	•	~~Ability in growing markets to grow the Company’s market share relative to its competitors.~~

	•	~~Success in meeting cost reduction goals in the restructuring and reorganizing of our businesses.~~

	•	~~Ability to successfully integrate our businesses with operations of acquired businesses.~~

	•	~~Ability to finance the growth of businesses with internal resources or through outside financing at reasonable rates.~~

~~Item 1.~~	~~Legal Proceedings~~

~~None.~~

~~Item 2.~~	~~Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds~~

~~Item 3.~~For:	~~Defaults Upon Senior Securities~~

~~None.~~10,222,737
Withhold Authority:
~~Item 4.~~	~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~

~~None.~~

~~Item 5.~~	~~Other Information~~

~~None.~~2,245,767

~~Item 6.~~	~~Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K~~

~~(a) Exhibits~~

~~(99) Certifications~~

		~~(a)~~	~~Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~
For:
		~~(b)~~	~~Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted by Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.~~
10,972,726			Withhold Authority:

~~(b) The following reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter:~~
1,495,778

	•		~~Form 8-K filed July 19, 2002 reporting the Acquisition of Montena Components, Ltd. and restructuring of I-Bus/Phoenix, Inc.~~
For:
		•		~~Amended Form 8-K filed on September 18, 2002 with Financial Statements and Pro Forma Financial~~
8,475,932			~~information relating to the acquisition of Montena Components, Ltd.~~Against:
1,267,642	Abstain:	40,739		Broker non-vote: 2,684,191

3.4	Bylaws of the Registrant as amended to date.
10.45	Amendment Number Six to the Registrant’s 1995 Stock Option Plan
10.46	Services Agreement, dated April 4, 2003, between the Registrant and Carlton J. Eibl.
10.47	Form of Director Indemnity Agreement.
(99)		Certifications

	MAXWELL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.



~~November 13, 2002~~May 14, 2003	/s/ ~~CARLTON J. EIBL~~RICHARD D. BALANSON

Date		~~Carlton J. Eibl,~~Richard D. Balanson, Chief Executive Officer



~~November 13, 2002~~May 14, 2003	/s/ JAMES A. BAUMKER

Date	James A. Baumker, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

May 14, 2003		/s/ RICHARD D. BALANSON
Date		Signature
		Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)