UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
----------------------
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31,June 30, 2008
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ______________ to ______________
Commission File Number 000-20848
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
Delaware 65-0231984
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation (I.R.S. Employer
or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1110 W. Commercial Blvd., Suite 100, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309
(Address of principal executive offices)
(954) 958-1200
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such period that the registrant was
required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes _x_x No ___
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of "accelerated
filer and large accelerated filer" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer __ Accelerated filer __x__x Non-accelerated filer __
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ___ No __x__x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes
of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 39,399,36939,858,019 shares of common
stock, par value $0.01 per share, outstanding on April 30,August 1, 2008 (including
1,650,000906,000 shares held in trust).
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page No.
PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm 3
Condensed Consolidated Balance SheetSheets as of March 31,June 30, 2008 4
and December 31, 2007 4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the 5
Six-Month and Three-Month Periods Ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and
2007
5
Condensed Consolidated StatementStatements of Stockholders' Equity 6
for the Three-Month PeriodSix-Month Periods Ended March 31,June 30, 2008 6and 2007
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowFlows for the Three-Month7
Six-Month Periods Ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007 7
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements 8
ITEM 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition 19
and Results of Operations 19
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk 3233
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures 3234
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings 3234
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors 3334
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 3334
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 3335
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 3335
ITEM 5. Other Information 3336
ITEM 6. Exhibits 3436
SIGNATURES 3539
2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Fort Lauderdale, Florida
We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES as of March 31,June 30, 2008 and the
related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the six-month and
three-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007 and cash flows for each of the
three-monthsix-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007. These interim financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.
We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making
inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to the accompanying interim financial statements for them to be in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
/s/ Blackman Kallick LLP
Chicago, Illinois
May 12,August 11, 2008
3
PART I -- FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(Unaudited)
March 31, December 31,
ASSETS 2008 2007
------------ ------------
Cash and cash equivalents $263,860,785 $214,745,606
Investments 1,584,473 0
Real estate, net 3,473,542 3,392,827
Prepaid reinsurance premiums 172,673,955 172,672,795
Reinsurance recoverables 56,194,811 46,399,265
Premiums and other receivables, net 43,628,725 38,045,097
Property and equipment, net 1,027,184 874,430
Deferred income taxes 15,719,750 14,202,956
Other assets 792,592 860,389
------------ -----------
Total assets $558,955,817 $491,193,365
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses $67,281,057 $68,815,500
Unearned premiums 256,545,928 254,741,198
Deferred ceding commission, net 2,220,989 2,122,269
Accounts payable 3,248,280 2,972,147
Reinsurance payable, net 72,963,598 33,888,350
Federal and state income taxes payable 7,059,962 0
Dividends payable 7,028,319 3,241,145
Other accrued expenses 17,393,704 16,799,307
Other liabilities 13,791,639 11,035,444
Loans payable 0 2,820
Long-term debt 25,000,000 25,000,000
------------ ------------
Total liabilities 472,533,476 418,618,180
------------ ------------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Cumulative convertible preferred stock, $.01 par value 1,387 1,387
Authorized shares - 1,000,000
Issued shares - 138,640
Outstanding shares - 138,640
Minimum liquidation preference - $1,419,700
Common stock, $.01 par value 408,232 393,072
Authorized shares - 55,000,000
Issued shares - 40,823,103 and 39,307,103
Outstanding shares - 37,022,155 and 36,012,729
Treasury shares at cost - 900,948 and 394,374 shares (4,381,980) (974,746)
Common stock held in trust, at cost - 2,900,000 shares (2,349,000) (2,349,000)
Additional paid-in capital 31,510,373 24,779,798
Retained earnings 61,233,329 50,724,674
------------ -----------
Total stockholders' equity 86,422,341 72,575,185
------------ -----------
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $558,955,817 $491,193,365
============ ===========SHEETS
(Unaudited)
June 30, December 31,
ASSETS 2008 2007
-------------- -------------
Cash and cash equivalents $ 276,631,041 $214,745,606
Investments 1,577,623 -
Real estate, net 3,441,993 3,392,827
Prepaid reinsurance premiums 178,265,238 172,672,795
Reinsurance recoverables 46,755,061 46,399,265
Premiums and other receivables, net 51,647,037 38,505,322
Property and equipment, net 1,032,087 874,430
Deferred income taxes 15,494,757 14,202,956
Other assets 757,600 400,164
-------------- -------------
Total assets $ 575,602,437 $491,193,365
============== =============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
LIABILITIES:
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses $ 69,285,113 $ 68,815,500
Unearned premiums 274,672,532 254,741,198
Deferred ceding commission, net 2,404,471 2,122,269
Accounts payable 3,834,936 2,972,147
Reinsurance payable, net 68,432,781 33,888,350
Income taxes payable 629,416 -
Dividends payable 3,699,116 3,241,145
Other accrued expenses 13,896,826 16,799,307
Other liabilities 14,435,793 11,035,444
Loans payable - 2,820
Long-term debt 25,000,000 25,000,000
-------------- -------------
Total liabilities 476,290,984 418,618,180
-------------- -------------
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Cumulative convertible preferred stock, $.01 par
value 1,387 1,387
Authorized shares - 1,000,000
Issued shares - 138,640
Outstanding shares - 138,640
Minimum liquidation preference - $1,419,700
Common stock, $.01 par value 398,578 393,072
Authorized shares - 55,000,000
Issued shares - 39,858,019 and 39,307,103
Outstanding shares -38,031,472 and 36,012,729
Treasury shares at cost - 920,548 and 394,374
shares (4,453,097) (974,746)
Common stock held in trust, at cost - 906,000 and
2,900,000 shares (733,860) (2,349,000)
Additional paid-in capital 31,679,452 24,779,798
Retained earnings 72,418,993 50,724,674
-------------- -------------
Total stockholders' equity 99,311,453 72,575,185
-------------- -------------
Total liabilities and stockholders'
equity $ 575,602,437 $491,193,365
============== =============
The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an
integral part of these statements.
4
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
For the Three-Month
PeriodsSix For the Three
Months Ended March 31,June 30, Months Ended June 30,
2008 2007 ---------- -----------2008 2007
-------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
PREMIUMS EARNED AND OTHER REVENUES
Direct premiums written $269,585,900 $262,563,270 $142,918,231 $ 126,667,669 $ 130,989,353131,573,917
Ceded premiums written (89,770,703) (94,076,043)(183,989,760) (185,148,008) (94,219,057) (91,071,965)
-------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
Net premiums written 36,896,966 36,913,31085,596,140 77,415,262 48,699,174 40,501,952
(Increase) decrease in net unearned premium (1,803,571) 2,524,953(14,338,891) 5,228,113 (12,535,320) 2,703,160
-------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
Premiums earned, net 35,093,395 39,438,26371,257,249 82,643,375 36,163,854 43,205,112
Net investment income 1,240,878 2,726,2212,518,702 5,475,079 1,277,824 2,748,858
Commission revenue 6,867,187 2,352,85613,849,219 9,773,589 6,982,032 7,420,733
Other revenue 1,083,013 51,7022,353,711 110,233 1,270,698 58,531
-------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
Total premiums earned and other revenues 44,284,473 44,569,04289,978,881 98,002,276 45,694,408 53,433,234
-------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES
Losses and loss adjustment expenses 12,725,862 12,355,58330,242,028 24,866,277 17,516,166 12,497,543
General and administrative expenses 8,209,374 10,025,22617,484,322 21,304,473 9,274,948 11,292,398
-------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
Total operating costs and expenses 20,935,236 22,380,80947,726,350 46,170,750 26,791,114 23,789,941
-------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES 23,349,237 22,188,23342,252,531 51,831,526 18,903,294 29,643,293
Income taxes, current 10,557,716 9,374,43418,037,866 23,105,624 7,480,150 13,731,190
Income taxes, deferred (1,516,795) 438,970(1,291,801) (1,202,361) 224,994 (1,641,331)
-------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
Income taxes, net 9,040,921 9,813,40416,746,065 21,903,263 7,705,144 12,089,859
-------------- -------------- ------------- --------------
NET INCOME $ 14,308,31625,506,466 $ 12,374,82929,928,263 $ 11,198,150 $ 17,553,434
============== ============== ============= ==============
Basic net income per common share $ 0.390.68 $ 0.350.84 $ 0.30 $ 0.49
============== ============== ============= ==============
Weighted average of common shares
outstandingOutstanding - Basic 36,946,000 34,999,00037,421,000 35,528,000 37,897,000 35,577,000
============== ============== ============= ==============
Fully diluted net income per share $ 0.350.62 $ 0.300.73 $ 0.28 $ 0.43
============== ============== ============= ==============
Weighted average of common shares
outstandingOutstanding - Diluted 41,327,000 41,103,00040,831,000 41,217,000 40,335,000 40,851,000
============== ============== ============= ==============
Cash dividend declared per common share $ 0.10 $ 0.07 $ - $ -
============== ============== ============= ==============
The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
5
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Unaudited)(UNAUDITED)
FOR THREETHE SIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2008 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------AND 2007
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PREFERRED COMMON PREFERRED ADDITIONAL TOTAL
COMMON STOCK STOCK STOCK PAID-IN RETAINED STOCK HELD TREASURY STOCKHOLDERS'
SHARES SHARES AMOUNT AMOUNT CAPITAL EARNINGS IN TRUST STOCK EQUITY
---------- --------- ---------- --------- ----------- ------------- ------------- ------------ -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance,
December 31, 2007 39,307,103 138,640 $393,072 $1,387 $24,779,798 $50,724,674$ 393,072 $ 1,387 $ 24,779,798 $ 50,724,674 $(2,349,000) $ (974,746) $ 72,575,185
Issuance of common
stockCommon
Stock 1,516,000 15,160- 15,157 - 2,505,370 - - (3,407,234) (886,704)(886,707)
Issuance of Shares
from SGT - - - - 25,330 - 1,615,140 (4,041,705) (2,401,235)
Repurchase of Treasury
Shares - - - - - - - (71,117) (71,117)
Retirement of Treasury
Shares (965,084) - (9,651) - (4,540,063) - - 4,041,705 0
Stock compensation
plans 1,109,042 1,109,042- - - - 2,540,063 - - - 2,540,063
Net Income 14,308,316 14,308,316- - - - - 25,506,466 - - 25,506,466
Tax benefit on exercise
of stock options 3,039,081 3,039,081- - - - 5,706,780 - - - 5,706,780
Amortization of deferred
77,082 77,082
compensation - - - - 154,165 - - - 154,165
Declaration of dividends (3,799,661) (3,799,661)- - - - - (3,812,147) - - (3,812,147)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance,
MarchJune 30, 2008 39,858,019 138,640 $ 398,578 $ 1,387 $ 31,679,452 $ 72,418,993 $(733,860) $(4,453,097) $ 99,311,453
=============================================================================================================
Balance,
December 31, 2008 40,823,1032006 38,057,103 138,640 $408,232 $1,387 $31,510,373 $61,233,329$ 380,572 $ 1,387 $ 18,726,387 $ 5,390,392 $(2,349,000) $(4,381,980) $86,422,341$ (101,820) $ 22,047,918
Issuance of Common
Stock 1,000,000 - 10,000 - 1,750,500 - - (872,926) 887,574
Stock compensation
plans - - - - 679,911 - - - 679,911
Net Income - - - - - 29,928,263 - - 29,928,263
Tax benefit on exercise
of stock options - - - - 1,414,221 - - - 1,414,221
Deferred Compensation - - - - (925,000) - - - (925,000)
Amortization of deferred
compensation - - - - 113,596 - - - 113,596
Declaration of dividends - - - - - (2,483,867) - - (2,483,867)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Balance,
June 30, 2007 39,057,103 138,640 $ 390,572 $ 1,387 $ 21,759,615 $ 32,834,788 $(2,349,000) $ (974,746) $ 51,662,616
=============================================================================================================
The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
6
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Three(UNAUDITED)
Six Months Ended ThreeSix Months Ended
March 31,June 30, 2008 March 31,June 30, 2007
------------------- ------------------------------------- ---------------
Cash flows from operating activities
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net Income $ 14,308,31625,506,466 $ 12,374,82929,928,263
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities
Allowance for doubtful accounts 657,268 660,281843,789 1,384,390
Amortization and depreciation 121,751 83,532227,475 166,318
Loss on disposal of assets 0 25,627
Issuance of common stock as compensation 1,186,125 1,050,8222,694,229 793,508
Deferred taxes (1,516,794) 438,970(1,291,801) (1,202,361)
Tax benefit on exercise of stock options (2,513,609) 0(4,677,743) (1,143,325)
Net change in assets and liabilities relating to operating activities:
0
Reinsurance recoverables (9,795,546) (20,888,395)(355,796) (10,481,569)
Prepaid reinsurance premiums (1,160) (33,000,758)(5,592,443) (46,767,461)
Premiums and other receivables (6,240,896) 3,842,063(8,278,726) 3,687,011
Deferred acquisition costs, net 0 (272,210)2,106,116
Other assets 67,796 975(357,436) 1,502
Reinsurance payable 39,075,248 52,439,31534,544,431 (958,956)
Deferred ceding commission, net 98,720 0282,202 1,558,077
Other liabilities 2,756,195 3,546,9783,400,349 7,458,003
Accounts payable 276,133 (388,157)862,790 (1,052,541)
Taxes payable 10,099,043 (6,477,978)629,416 5,529,959
Other accrued expenses 594,395 (1,963,337)(2,973,598) (1,689,970)
Unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses (1,534,443) 2,363,256469,613 2,566,462
Unearned premiums 1,804,730 30,475,805
------------------- -----------------------19,931,334 41,539,348
-------------- ---------------
Net cash provided by operating activities 49,443,272 44,285,991
------------------- -----------------------
Cash flows from investing activities65,864,551 33,448,401
-------------- ---------------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: (322,251) (123,287)
Capital expenditures (243,171) 0(112,047) (16,290)
Building improvements (112,047) (12,461)(1,577,623) 0
Purchase of investments (1,584,473) 0
------------------- ------------------------------------- ---------------
Net cash used in investing activities (1,939,691) (12,461)
------------------- -----------------------
Cash flows from financing activities(2,011,921) (139,577)
-------------- ---------------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Preferred stock dividend (12,487) (12,488)(24,975) (24,975)
Issuance of common stock 2,520,530 0130,530 835,500
Acquisition of treasury stock (3,407,234) 0(3,418,470) (872,926)
Tax benefit on exercise of stock options 2,513,609 04,677,743 1,143,325
Common stock dividend paid (3,329,203) (1,915,354)
Repayments of loans payable (2,820) (4,807,327)
------------------- -----------------------(9,314,737)
-------------- ---------------
Net cash provided (used) byused in financing activities 1,611,598 (4,819,815)
------------------- -----------------------(1,967,195) (10,149,167) 0
-------------- ---------------
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 49,115,179 39,453,715
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning61,885,435 23,159,657
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, Beginning of period 214,745,606 232,890,297
------------------- -----------------------
Cash and cash equivalents at end-------------- ---------------
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, End of period $ 263,860,785276,631,041 $ 272,344,012
=================== =======================256,049,954
============== ===============
Non cash items ------------------- ------------------------------------- ---------------
$ 3,699,116 $ 2,446,392
Dividends accrued $ 3,787,174 $ 2,446,392
=================== ===================================== ===============
The accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements are an integral part of these statements.
7
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2008
(UNAUDITED)
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. ("Company"), its wholly owned
property and casualty insurance subsidiary, Universal Property & Casualty
Insurance Company ("UPCIC"), and other wholly owned subsidiaries of the Company
including the Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc. Stock Grantor Trust. All
intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America ("GAAP") that differ from statutory accounting
practices prescribed or permitted for insurance companies by regulatory
authorities. In addition, the accompanying financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of
Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"("SEC"). Accordingly,
they omit or condense certain footnotes and other information normally included
in financial statements prepared in conformity with GAAP and thus should be read
in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes
included in the Company's annual reportAnnual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the year
ended December 31, 2007.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of March 31,June 30, 2008, the
related condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three- monthsix-month and
three-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007, and condensed consolidated
statements of cash flows for the three-monthsix-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007
are unaudited. There were no items comprising comprehensive income for the
three-monthsix-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007. Accordingly, consolidated
statements of comprehensive income are not presented. The significant accounting
policies followed for quarterly financial reporting are the same as those
disclosed in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the
Company's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB, as amended, for the year ended December
31, 2007, except for the adoption of a new accounting pronouncement as noted
below.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates. The accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments
(consisting primarily of normal and recurring accruals and adjustments) which
are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results
for the interim periods presented.
Results of operations for the three monthssix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008 are not
necessarily indicative of the results for the year ending December 31, 2008.
To conform to the 2008 presentation, certain amounts in the prior periods'
consolidated financial statements and notes have been reclassified.
8
2. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In JuneSeptember 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB
Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an entity's financial
statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, "Accounting for Income
Taxes." FIN 48 prescribes that a company should use a more-likely-than-not
recognition threshold based on the technical merits of the tax position taken.
Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not threshold should be measured in
order to determine the tax benefit to be recognized in the financial statements.
This Interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and
transition. FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2006. The Company adopted FIN 48 as of January 1, 2007 and the adoption had a
negligible impact on the Company's results of operation and financial position.
In December 2007, the Company paid interest and penalties for the underpayment
of estimated federal and state income tax in accordance with the provisions of
the relevant tax law. Interest and penalties are classified in the Company's
condensed consolidated financial statements as income taxes.
9
In September 2006, the FASB issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards ("SFAS") No. 157 which redefines
fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies where
other accounting pronouncements require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS
No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The
effects of adoption were determined by the types of instruments carried at fair
value in the Company's financial statements at the time of adoption as well as
the method utilized to determine their fair values prior to adoption. Based on
the Company's current use of fair value measurements, the adoption of SFAS No.
157 did not have a material effect on the results of operations or financial
position of the Company.
8
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities" ("SFAS 159") which permits entities to choose
to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value that
are not currently required to be measured at fair value. SFAS 159 became
effective for the Company on January 1, 2008. SFAS 159 has not had a material
effect on the Company's financial position, cash flows and results of
operations.
In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), "Business
Combinations" ("SFAS 141R"), and SFAS 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in
Consolidated Financial Statements" ("SFAS 160"), to improve, simplify, and
converge internationally the accounting for business combinations and the
reporting of noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements. The
provisions of SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 are effective as of the beginning of the
Company's 2009 fiscal year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of
adopting SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 on its financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, "Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 161"), which amends and expands the
disclosure requirements of SFAS 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133"), to provide an enhanced understanding of an
entity's use of derivative instruments, how they are accounted for under SFAS
133 and their effect on the entity's financial position, financial performance
and cash flows. The provisions of SFAS 161 are effective as of the beginning of
the Company's 2009 fiscal year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact
of adopting SFAS 161 on its financial statements.
3. INSURANCE OPERATIONS
UPCIC commenced its insurance activity in February 1998 by assuming policies
from the Florida Residential Property and Casualty Joint Underwriting
Association ("JUA"). UPCIC received the unearned premiums of the assumed
policies and began servicing such policies. Since then, UPCIC has developed its
business by actively soliciting business in the open market through independent
agents.
Unearned premiums represent amounts that UPCIC would be required to refund
policyholders if their policies were canceled. UPCIC determines unearned
premiums by calculating the pro-rata amount that would be due to the
policyholders at a given point in time based upon the premiums due for the full
policy term. At March 31,June 30, 2008, UPCIC hadwas servicing approximately 432,000
homeowners' and dwelling fire insurance policies with direct unearned premiums
totaling $256,545,928$274,672,532 and in-force premiums of approximately $504,000,000.$513,000,000. At
December 31, 2007, UPCIC hadwas servicing 374,000 homeowners' and dwelling fire
insurance policies with direct unearned premiums totaling $254,741,198 and
in-force premiums of approximately $504,500,000.
Premiums earned are included in earnings on a pro-rata basis over the terms of
the policies. UPCIC does not have policies that provide for retroactive premium
adjustments.
Policy acquisition costs, consisting of commissions and other costs that vary
with and are directly related to the production of business, net of ceding
commissions, are deferred and amortized over the terms of the policies, but only
to the extent that unearned premiums are sufficient to cover all related costs
and expenses. Deferred policy acquisition costs are reviewed to determine if
they are recoverable from unearned premiums and, if not, are charged to expense.
As of March 31,June 30, 2008 and December 31,June 30, 2007, respectively, no amounts of deferred
policy acquisition costs were charged to expense as a result of the
10
recoverability testing. As of March 31,June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, deferred
ceding commissions exceeded deferred policy acquisition costs and were recorded
as net liabilities in the amounts of $2,220,989$2,404,471 and $2,122,269, respectively.
An allowance for doubtful accounts is established when it becomes evident that
collection is doubtful, typically after 90 days past due. As of March 31,June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, UPCIC had recorded allowances for doubtful accounts in
the amounts of $1,489,928$1,676,449 and $832,660, respectively.
9
Loss and loss adjustment expenses ("LAE"), less related reinsurance, are
recorded as claims are incurred. The provision for unpaid loss and LAE includes:
(1) the accumulation of individual case estimates for loss and LAE reported, but
not paid prior to the close of the accounting period; (2) estimates for incurred
but unreported claims based on past experience modified for current trends; and
(3) estimates of expenses for investigating and adjusting claims based on past
experience.
Management continues to take action to try to strengthen UPCIC's financial
condition. On the Company'sUPCIC's Homeowner's programProgram ("HO"), premium rate increases
averaging 9.9% and 13.2% statewide were approved by the Florida Office of
Insurance Regulation ("OIR") and implemented with effective dates in May 2006
and October 2006, respectively. On the Company'sUPCIC's Dwelling Fire programProgram ("DP"), premium
rate increases averaging 11.2% and 30.6% statewide were also approved by the OIR
and implemented with effective dates in May 2006 and September 2006,
respectively. However, a rate filing mandated by the Florida legislatureLegislature in 2007
due to a new law presumed to reduce insurers' reinsurance costs resulted in rate
decreases averaging 11.1% statewide (HO) and 2.3% statewide (DP) and was
approved by the OIR and implemented inintegrated into UPCIC's rates on June 1, 2007. This had
an adverse effect on the Company'sUPCIC's premium volume. The effect of these rate decreases
have been flowing throughon existing policies and the Company's book of business as it renews
such that the full impact of thecorresponding premium decreases onin direct written
premium written
should bewere completed byon May 31, 2008. In addition, the Company believesUPCIC implemented premium
discounts resulting from wind mitigation efforts implementedby policyholders. Such
discounts were mandated by the Florida legislature, whichLegislature and became effective June 1,
2007 for new business, and August 1, 2007 for renewal business, should diminish during the third quarter of 2008 as a
number of insureds have previously qualified.business. Additionally, a
rate decrease of 4.1% statewide (HO) and a rate decrease of 0.2% statewide (DP)
were approved by the OIR and implemented with effective dates in January 2008
for the HO program and March 2008 for the DP program. The effect of these rate
decreases havehas begun to flow through the Company'sUPCIC's book of business such that the full
impact of the premium decreases on direct premiums written should be completedrealized by
January 2009 for the HO program and March 2009 for the DP program.
UPCIC uses proprietary systems for policy issuance and administration. This has
enhanced UPCIC's operating results through its ability to improve and better
control underwriting and loss adjusting activities. In addition, UPCIC monitors
the geographic and coverage mix of the property insurance it writes, which is a
key determinant in the amount and pricing of reinsurance procured by UPCIC.
Management believes these processes, and results attributable to them, will
continue to allow UPCIC to operate profitably. However, there can be no
assurance of the ultimate success of the Company's plans, or that the Company
will be able to maintain profitability.
4. REINSURANCE
In the normal course of business, UPCIC seeks to reduce the loss that may arise
from catastrophes or other events that cause unfavorable underwriting results by
reinsuring certain levels of risk in various areas of exposure with other
insurance enterprises or reinsurers. Amounts recoverable from reinsurers are
estimated in a manner consistent with the reinsurance contracts. Reinsurance
11
premiums, losses and LAE are accounted for on bases consistent with those used
in accounting for the original policies issued and the terms of the reinsurance
contracts. Reinsurance ceding commissions received are deferred and netted
against policy acquisition costs and amortized over the effective period of the
related insurance policies.
UPCIC limits the maximum net loss that can arise from large risks or risks in
concentrated areas of exposure by reinsuring (ceding) certain levels of risks
with other insurers or reinsurers, either on an automatic basis under general
reinsurance contracts known as "treaties" or by negotiation on substantial
individual risks. The reinsurance arrangements are intended to provide UPCIC
with the ability to maintain its exposure to loss within its capital resources.
Such reinsurance includes quota share, excess of loss and catastrophe forms of
reinsurance. While ceding premiums to reinsurers reduces UPCIC's risk of
exposure in the event of catastrophic losses, it also reduces UPCIC's potential
for greater profits should such catastrophic events fail to occur. The Company
10
submits the UPCIC reinsurance program for regulatory review to the OIR.
In light of the four windstorm catastrophes Florida experienced in 2004, and
three windstorm catastrophes Florida experienced in 2005, there was a
significant increase in the cost of catastrophe reinsurance coverage commencing
with the June 1, 2006 renewal which the Company had planned and factored into
its policy pricing. Effective June 1, 2006, UPCIC reduced the rate of cession on
its quota share reinsurance. Quota share reinsurance is used primarily to
increase UPCIC's underwriting capacity and to reduce exposure to losses. Quota
share reinsurance refers to a form of reinsurance under which the reinsurer
participates in a specified percentage of the premiums and losses on all
reinsured policies in a given class of business. As a result of this reduction
of UPCIC's quota share reinsurance from 80% to 50%, UPCIC has retained and
earned more premiums UPCICit writes, but has also retained more related losses.
UPCIC's increased exposure to potential losses could have a material adverse
effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations of UPCIC
and the Company. UPCIC did not experience any catastrophic events during the
three-monthsix-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.2007.
Effective June 1, 2007,2008, UPCIC entered into a quota share reinsurance treaty and
excess per risk agreements with various reinsurers. Under the quota share
treaty, through May 31, 2008,2009, UPCIC cedes 50% of its gross written premiums,
losses and LAE for policies with coverage for wind risk with a ceding commission
payable to UPCIC equal to 31% of ceded gross written premiums. In addition, the
quota share treaty has a limitation for any one occurrence of 40%55% of gross
premiums earned, not to exceed $100,000,000$150,000,000 (of which UPCIC's net liability in a
first event scenario is $45,000,000,$70,000,000, in a second event scenario is $9,300,000$14,800,000
and in a third event scenario is $9,300,000)$15,000,000) and a limitation from losses
arising out of events that are assigned a catastrophe serial number by the
Property Claims Services ("PCS") office of 112%164% of gross premiums earned, not to
exceed $280,000,000.$450,000,000.
Effective June 1, 20072008 through May 31, 2008,2009, UPCIC entered into a multiple line
excess per risk agreement with various reinsurers. Under the multiple line
excess per risk agreement, UPCIC obtained coverage of $1,300,000 in excess of
$500,000 ultimate net loss for each risk and each property loss, and $1,000,000
in excess of $300,000 for each casualty loss. A $5,200,000$7,800,000 aggregate limit
applies to the term of this agreement. Additionally under this agreement, no
property claim shall be made until UPCIC has retained the contract.first $1,300,000 of
potential recovery.
Effective June 1, 20072008 through May 31, 2008,2009, UPCIC entered into a property per
risk excess agreement covering ex-wind only policies. Under the property per
risk excess agreement, UPCIC obtained coverage of $300,000 in excess of $200,000
for each property loss. A $2,100,000 aggregate limit applies to the term of the contract.
12
this
agreement.
Effective June 1, 20072008 through May 31, 2008,2009, under an excess catastrophe
contract, UPCIC obtained catastrophe coverage of $576,000,000$399,000,000 in excess of
$100,000,000$150,000,000 covering certain loss occurrences including hurricanes. TheThis
contract contains a provision for one reinstatement in the event coverage is
exhausted; additional premium is calculated pro rata as to amount and 100% as to
time. Effective June 1, 20072008 through May 31, 2008,2009, UPCIC purchased a
reinstatement premium protection contract which reimburses UPCIC for its cost to
reinstate the catastrophe coverage of the first $426,000,000$274,000,000 (part of
$399,000,000) in excess of $100,000,000.$150,000,000. Effective June 1, 2007,2008, UPCIC also
obtained subsequent catastrophe event excess of loss reinsurance to cover
certain levels of UPCIC's net retention through three catastrophe events
including hurricanes. UPCIC also obtained coverage from the Florida Hurricane
Catastrophe Fund ("FHCF"). The approximate coverage is estimated to be for 90% of
$1,065,387,373$1,340,000,000 in excess of $208,693,813.$290,000,000. Also at June 1, 2007,2008, the FHCF made
available, and UPCIC obtained, $10,000,000 of additional catastrophe excess of
loss coverage with one free reinstatement of coverage to carriers qualified as
Limited Apportionment Companies or companies that participated in the Insurance
11
Capital Build-Up Incentive Program offered by the FHCF (the "ICBUI Program"),
such as UPCIC. This particular layer of coverage is $10,000,000 in excess of
$18,600,000. UPCIC also
purchased Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund Recovery Shortfall Reinsurance
("FHCF Recovery Shortfall Reinsurance") in the event FHCF cannot fulfill its
payment obligations for the 2007-2008 Hurricane Season.$29,600,000.
The total cost of UPCIC's underlying catastrophe private reinsurance program
effective June 1, 20072008 through May 31, 20082009 is $113,178,000$86,795,000 of which UPCIC's cost
is 50%, or $56,589,000,$43,397,500, and the quota share reinsurers' cost is the remaining
50%. In addition, UPCIC purchases reinstatement premium protection as described
above which amounts to $14,213,402 of cost.$12,266,483. The cost of subsequent event catastrophe
reinsurance is $11,184,125.$12,180,000. The estimated premium UPCIC plans to cede to the
FHCF for the 20072008 hurricane season is $42,853,590$57,870,530 of which UPCIC's cost is 50%,
or $21,426,795,$28,935,265, and the quota share reinsurers' cost is the remaining 50%. UPCIC
is also participating in the additional coverage option for Limited
Apportionment Companies or companies that participated in the ICBUI Program, the
premium for which is $5,000,000, of which UPCIC's cost is 50%, or $2,500,000,
and the quota share reinsurers' cost is the remaining 50%.
Effective July 1, 2008 through May 31, 2009, under an excess catastrophe
contract, UPCIC obtained an additional $90,000,000 of catastrophe coverage via a
new top layer of 90% of $100,000,000 in excess of $549,000,000 covering certain
loss occurrences including hurricanes. The contract contains a provision for one
reinstatement in the event coverage is exhausted; additional premium is
calculated pro rata as to amount and 100% as to time. The total cost of UPCIC's FHCF Recovery Shortfall Reinsurancethis new
top layer is $7,715,520,$7,200,000 of which UPCIC's cost is 50%, or $3,857,760.$3,600,000, and the
quota share reinsurers' cost is the remaining 50%.
Also effective July 1, 2008 through May 31, 2009, UPCIC secured an additional
$80,000,000 of third event catastrophe coverage via a new layer of 80% of
$100,000,000. The total cost of this new layer is $4,000,000 of which UPCIC's
cost is 50%, or $2,000,000, and the quota share reinsurers' cost is the
remaining 50%.
Effective June 1, 2007,2008, the Company obtained $30,000,000$60,000,000 of coverage via a
catastrophe risk-linked transaction product in the event UPCIC's catastrophe
coverage andis exhausted or UPCIC is unable to successfully collect from the FHCF
Recovery Shortfall Insurance coverage are exhausted.for losses involving the Temporary Increase in Coverage Limits. The total cost
of the Company's risk-linked transaction product is $3,525,000.$10,260,000.
UPCIC is responsible for losses related to catastrophic events with incurred
losses in excess of coverage provided by UPCIC's reinsurance program, which
could have a material adverse effect on UPCIC's and the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations. At the start of the hurricane
season on June 1, 2008, UPCIC believes it will havehas coverage to approximately the 125-year133-year
Probable Maximum Loss (PML). With the additional catastrophic coverage via the
new top layer effective July 1, 2008, UPCIC would have had coverage to
approximately the 145-year PML. For the 2007 hurricane season, UPCIC had
coverage to approximately the 150-year PML. PML is a general concept applied in
the insurance industry for defining high loss scenarios that should be
considered when underwriting insurance risk. Catastrophe models produce loss
estimates that are qualified in terms of dollars and probabilities. Probability
of Exceedance or the probability that the actual loss level will exceed a
particular threshold is a standard catastrophe model output. For example, the
100-year PML represents a 1.00% Annual Probability of Exceedance (the 125-year133-year
PML represents a 0.80%0.752% Annual Probability of Exceedance and the 145-year PML
represents a 0.690% Annual Probability of Exceedance). It is estimated that the
100-year PML is likely to be equaled or exceeded in one year out of 100 on
average, or 1 percent of the time. It is the 99th percentile of the annual loss
distribution.
The reinsurance arrangements had the following effect on certain items in the
accompanying consolidated financial statements:
1312
ThreeSix Months Ended ThreeSix Months Ended
March 31,June 30, 2008 March 31,June 30, 2007
---------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------
Premiums Premiums--------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Loss and Loss Loss and Loss
Premiums Premiums Loss and Loss
Written EarnedAdjustment Premiums Premiums Adjustment
Written Earned AdjustmentExpenses Written Earned Expenses
------- ------ Expenses-------- ------- ------- Expenses------ -------- ---------
Direct $126,667,669 $124,862,938 $24,421,144 $130,989,353 $100,513,548 $23,353,610$269,585,900 $249,654,565 $60,198,535 $262,563,270 $221,023,922 $48,700,037
Ceded (89,770,703) (89,769,543) (11,695,282) (94,076,043) (61,075,285) (10,998,027)
---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- --------------- ---------------(183,989,760) (178,397,316) (29,956,507) (185,148,008) (138,380,547) (23,833,760)
------------- ------------- ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------
Net $36,896,966 $35,093,395 $12,725,862 $36,913,310 $39,438,263 $12,355,583
================ =============== =============== ================ =============== ===============$ 85,596,140 $ 71,257,249 $30,242,028 $77,415,262 $ 82,643,375 $24,866,277
============= ============= ============ ============= ============= ============
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008 June 30, 2007
--------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Loss and Loss Loss and Loss
Premiums Premiums Adjustment Premiums Premiums Adjustment
Written Earned Expenses Written Earned Expenses
------- ------ -------- ------- ------ --------
Direct $142,918,231 $124,791,627 $35,777,390 $131,573,917 $120,510,374 $25,333,276
Ceded (94,219,057) (88,627,773) (18,261,224) (91,071,965) (77,305,262) (12,835,733)
------------- ------------- ------------ ------------- ------------- ------------
Net $48,699,174 $ 36,163,854 $17,516,166 $ 40,501,952 $ 43,205,112 $12,497,543
============= ============= ============ ============= ============= ============
OTHER AMOUNTS:
March 31, 2008
--------------
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses $35,986,506
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses 20,208,305
-----------
Reinsurance recoverables $56,194,811
===========
Prepaid reinsurance premiums $172,673,955OTHER AMOUNTS:
June 30, 2008
-------------
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and loss $36,673,312
adjustment expenses
Reinsurance recoverable on paid losses 10,081,749
------------
Reinsurance recoverables $46,755,061
============
Prepaid reinsurance premiums $178,265,238
============
Reinsurance payable, net $68,432,781
============
Reinsurance payable, net $72,963,598
===========
Reinsurance payable, as of March 31,June 30, 2008, has been reduced by $25,342,815,$8,224,869, which
represents ceding commissions due from reinsurers and $64,627,888$39,701,914 which
represents inuring premiums receivable. The Company has determined that a right
of offset, as defined in FASB interpretationInterpretation No. 39, "Offsetting of Amounts
Related to Certain Contracts," exists between the Company and its reinsurers,
under its quota share reinsurance treaties.
UPCIC's reinsurance contracts do not relieve UPCIC from its obligations to
policyholders. Failure of reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in
losses to UPCIC; consequently, allowances are established for amounts deemed
uncollectible. No allowance is deemed necessary at March 31,June 30, 2008. UPCIC
evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers and monitors concentrations
of credit risk arising from similar geographic regions, activities, or economic
characteristics of the reinsurers to minimize its exposure to significant losses
from reinsurer insolvencies. UPCIC currently has reinsurance contracts with
various reinsurers located throughout the United States and internationally.
UPCIC believes that ceding risks to reinsurers whom it considers to be
financially sound combined with the distribution of reinsurance contracts to an
array of reinsurers adequately minimizes UPCIC's risk from any potential
operating difficulties of its reinsurers.
UPCIC may also be subject to assessments by Citizens Property Insurance
Corporation ("Citizens"), Florida's state-run insurer of last resort, and the
FHCF as a result of operating deficiencies related to windstorm catastrophes. In
addition, the Company is subject to assessments by the Florida Insurance
Guaranty Association ("FIGA"). FIGA services pending claims by or against
Florida policyholders of member insurance companies which become insolvent and
are ordered liquidated. FIGA's membership is composed of all Florida licensed
13
direct writers of property or casualty insurance. Under Florida's current
statutes and regulations, insurers may recoup the amount of their assessments
from policyholders, or in
14
some cases collect the amount of the assessments from
policyholders as surcharges for the benefit of the assessing entity.
On June 12, 2006, the OIR ordered an emergency FHCF assessment of 1% of direct
premiums written for policies with effective dates beginning January 1, 2007,
which UPCIC is currently collecting from policyholders, as the assessment is to
policyholders, not UPCIC. This assessment was a result of catastrophe losses
Florida experienced in 2004 and 2005. The assessments collected from
policyholders are remitted to FHCF quarterly.
During its meeting on June 16, 2006, theFIGA's Board of Directors of ("FIGA Board")
determined the need for an assessment upon its member companies. FIGA decided on
an assessment on member companies of 2% of the Florida net direct premiums for
the calendar year 2005. Based on the 2005 net direct premium of $11.2 billion,
this would generate approximately $225 million. The Company's participation in
this assessment totaled $1,772,861. Pursuant to Florida statutes,law, insurers are
permitted to recoup the assessment by adding a surcharge to policies in an
amount not to exceed the amount paid by the insurer to FIGA. The Company
recouped this assessment in 2006.
On September 14, 2006, the Board of Governors of Citizens authorized the levying
of a regular assessment on assessable insurers to recoup the 2005 Plan Year
Deficit incurred in the High Risk Account. The assessment is based upon UPCIC's
share of direct written premium for the subject lines of business in the State
of Florida for the calendar year preceding the plan year in which the deficit
occurred. UPCIC's participation in this assessment totaled $263,650. Pursuant to
Florida law, insurers are permitted to recoup the assessment by adding a
surcharge to policies in an amount not to exceed the amount paid by the insurer
to Citizens. As a result, UPCIC recorded this assessment as an expense during
the year ended December 31, 2006 and began implementing the recoupment in
connection with this assessment in 2007.
During its meeting on December 14, 2006, the Board of Directors of FIGA (the
"FIGA Board")Board determined the need for
an emergency assessment upon its member companies. The FIGA Board decided on an
emergency assessment on member companies of 2% of the Florida net direct
premiums for the calendar year 2005. Based on the 2005 net direct premiums of
$11.2 billion, this assessment would generate approximately $225 million.
UPCIC's participation in this assessment totaled $1,772,861. Pursuant to Florida
law, insurers are permitted to recoup the assessment by adding a surcharge to
policies in an amount not to exceed the amount paid by the insurer to FIGA. As a
result, UPCIC recorded this assessment as an expense during the year ended
December 31, 2006 and began implementing the recoupment in connection with this
assessment in 2007.
On January 11, 2007, the OIR ordered an emergency Citizens assessment of 1.4% of
certain direct written premiums for policies with effective dates beginning July
1, 2007. This assessment was a result of catastrophic losses the stateState of
Florida experienced in 2005. This assessment will be in effect for 10 years.
UPCIC assesses this surcharge to policyholders at the policy effective date and
remits to Citizens the assessments collected on a monthly basis.
During its meeting on October 11, 2007, the FIGA Board again determined the need
for an assessment upon its member companies, which the OIR approved on October
29, 2007. The FIGA Board decided on an assessment on member companies of 2% of
the Florida net direct premiums for the calendar year 2006. Based on the 2006
net direct premiums of $ 15.8$15.8 billion, this assessment would generate
approximately $315 million. UPCIC's participation in this assessment totaled
$7,435,090. Pursuant to Florida law, insurers are permitted to recoup the
assessment by adding a surcharge to policies in an amount not to exceed the
amount paid by the insurer to FIGA. As a result, UPCIC recorded this assessment
as an expense during the year ended December 31, 2007 and has begun implementing
14
the recoupment in connection with this assessment in 2008.
5. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share ("EPS") amounts are calculated in accordance with SFAS No.
128, EARNINGS PER SHARE."Earnings per Share." Basic EPS is based on the weighted average number of
shares outstanding for the period, excluding any dilutive common share
equivalents. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if
securities to issue common stock were exercised.
A reconciliation of shares used in calculating basic and diluted EPS for the
six-month and three-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
follows:
15
Three Months Ended
------------------
March 31, 2008 March 31, 2007
-------------- --------------
Number of shares used in calculating basic EPS 36,946,000 34,999,000
Effect of assumed conversion of common stock equivalents 4,381,000 6,104,000
---------- ----------
Number of shares used in calculating diluted EPS 41,327,000 41,103,000
Six Months Ended
----------------
June 30, 2008 June 30, 2007
------------- -------------
Number of shares used in calculating
basic EPS 37,421,000 35,528,000
Effect of assumed conversion of common
stock equivalents 3,410,000 5,689,000
----------------- -----------------
Number of shares used in calculating
diluted EPS 40,831,000 41,217,000
Three Months Ended
------------------
June 30, 2008 June 30, 2007
------------- -------------
Number of shares used in calculating
basic EPS 37,897,000 35,577,000
Effect of assumed conversion of common
stock equivalents 2,438,000 5,274,000
----------------- -----------------
Number of shares used in calculating
diluted EPS 40,355,000 40,851,000
Options to purchase 3,040,000 and 0 shares of common stock for the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and options to purchase
1,575,000 and 400,000 shares of common stock for the three-
monththree-month periods ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, were not included in the computation of
diluted earnings per share because the exercise price of the options was greater
than the average market priceprices during the relevant period.periods.
6. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS AND WARRANTS
Effective January, 2006, the Company adopted SFAS No. 123 (R), "Share-Based
Payments," and began recognizing compensation expense in its Consolidated
Statements of Operations for its stock option grants based on the fair value of
the awards. Under SFAS No.123 (R), the compensation expense for the stock
compensation plans that has been charged against income before income taxes was
$1,109,042$2,540,062 and $657,822$679,911 for the three-monthsix-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, with a corresponding deferred income tax benefit of $681,229$979,829 and
$404,067,$262,276, respectively. As of March 31,June 30, 2008 the total unrecognized compensation
cost related to nonvested share-based compensation granted under the stock
compensation plans was $1,367,277.$2,591,364. The cost is expected to be recognized over a
weighted average period of 0.430.86 year.
On May 16, 2008, the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of
1,440,000 shares of common stock to the Company's directors, executive officers
and management. All of the options granted on May 16, 2008 vest on May 16, 2009,
have an exercise price of $3.90 per share, and expire on May 16, 2013. The
15
options granted to Bradley I. Meier, the Company's President and Chief Executive
Officer, and to Sean P. Downes, the Company's Chief Operating Officer and Senior
Vice President, are only exercisable on such date or dates as the fair market
value (as defined in their respective option agreements) of the Company's common
stock is and has been at least one hundred fifty percent (150%) of the exercise
price for the previous twenty (20) consecutive trading days.
Cash received from option exercises under all stock compensation plans for the
three-monthsix-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007 was $130,530 and $0,
respectively. The actual tax benefit realized for tax deductions from option
exercises of share-based compensation was $3,039,083$5,706,780 and $0$1,414,221 for the
three-monthsix-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
16
At March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007, there were options outstanding to purchase 6,154,0005,600,000
and 6,880,0005,530,000 shares of common stock, respectively, with intrinsic values of
$13,026,150$6,510,900 and $16,807,100,$28,020,000, respectively, weighted average remaining contract
terms of 2.983.25 and 3.233.34 years, respectively, and weighted exercise prices of
$2.36$3.30 and $1.09,$1.13, respectively. Of the total options outstanding, options to
purchase 2,829,000835,000 and 5,130,0003,780,000 shares of common stock, respectively, were
currently exercisable with intrinsic values of $8,266,150$2,170,900 and $12,502,100,$19,025,000,
respectively, weighted average remaining contract terms of 3.002.53 and 3.383.71 years,
respectively, and weighted average exercise prices of $0.86$0.95 and $1.10,$1.16,
respectively. During the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008, no options to
purchase 1,440,000 shares of common stock were granted, and during the same
period in 2007, options to purchase 435,000 shares of common stock were granted.
Options to purchase 916,0002,910,000 and 750,000 shares of common stock were exercised
during the three-month
periodsix-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 while none were exercised during the same period in
2007.and 2007, respectively. Options
to purchase 35,000 shares of common stock expired during the three-monthsix-month period
ended March 31,June 30, 2008.
At March 31,June 30, 2008, there were no warrants outstanding to purchase shares of
common stock, and during the same period instock. At June 30, 2007, there were warrants outstanding and exercisable
to purchase 850,000 shares of common stock. Warrants to purchase 600,000 shares
of common stock were exercised during the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008,
while none were exercised during the same period in 2007.
The Company estimated the fair value of all stock options awards as of the grant
date by applying the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. The use of this
valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in
the determination of compensation expense and include the expected life of the
option, stock price volatility, risk-free interest rate, dividend yield,
exercise price, and forfeiture rate. Under SFAS 123(R), forfeitures are
estimated at the time of valuation and reduce expense ratably over the vesting
period. The forfeiture rate is adjusted periodically based on the extent to
which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous
estimate. Under SFAS 123 and APB 25, the Company elected to account for
forfeitures when awards were actually forfeited and reflect the forfeitures as a
cumulative adjustment to the pro forma expense.
The fair value ofThere were 1,440,000 options granted during the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,
2007 was estimated assuming the following: weighted average expected life of
2.5 years, dividend yield of 4.0 percent, risk-free interest rate of 4.75
percent, and expected volatility of 65.1 percent. There were no options granted
during the quarter ended March 31,June 30,
2008. In accordance with SFAS 123(R), fair values of options granted prior to
adoption and determined for purposes of disclosure under SFAS 123 have not been
changed. The fair value of options granted prior to adoption of SFAS 123(R) was
estimated assuming the following: weighted average expected life of five years,
dividend yield of 0.0 percent, risk-free interest rate of 6.5 percent, and
expected volatility as calculated at the date of grant. The fair value of
options granted during the six-month period ended June 30, 2008 was estimated
assuming the following: weighted average expected life of 2.59 years, dividend
yield of 4.0 percent, risk-free interest rate of 2.55 percent, and expected
volatility of 80.7 percent. There were 435,000 options granted during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007. The fair value of options during the
six-month period ended June 30, 2007 was estimated assuming the following:
weighted average expected life of 2.50 years, dividend yield of 4.0 percent,
risk-free interest rate of 4.76 percent, and expected volatility of 65.4
percent.
16
7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
All underwriting, rating, policy issuance, reinsurance negotiations and
administration functions for UPCIC are performed by UPCIC, Universal Risk
Advisors, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Blue Atlantic
Reinsurance Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company ("Blue
Atlantic"), and unaffiliated third parties. Claims adjusting functions are
performed by Universal Adjusting Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company, Blue Atlantic, Reinsurance Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and affiliated and unaffiliated third parties.
17
Downes and Associates, a multi-line insurance adjustment corporation based in
Deerfield Beach, Florida, performs certain claims adjusting work for UPCIC.
Downes and Associates is owned by Dennis Downes, who is the father of Sean P.
Downes, Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President of UPCIC. During the
three-monthsix-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company expensed claims
adjusting fees of $60,000$120,000 and $390,000,$540,000, respectively, to Downes and Associates.
The Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Atlas Florida
Financial Corporation ("Atlas"), which owned all of the outstanding common stock
of Sterling Premium Finance Company, Inc. ("Sterling"), from the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer for $50,000, which approximated
Sterling's book value. On March 6, 2008, the Company received approval of thethis
acquisition from the OIR. Sterling has been renamed Atlas Premium Finance
Company and commenced offering premium finance services in November 2007.
8. STOCK AND WARRANTS ISSUANCES
On January 2, 2008, the Company issued 15,000 shares of restricted common stock
at a price of $0.90 per share to Mr. Harris Siskind, a former Director of a
subsidiary of the Company, pursuant to Mr. Siskind's exercise of stock options.
Also on January 2, 2008, the Company issued 518,919 shares of common stock at a
price of $1.00 per share, to a private investor, pursuant to the exercise, on a
"cashless" basis, of warrants to purchase common stock. On January 7, 2008, the
Company issued 9,254, 16,716, 8,955 and 75,672 shares of restricted common stock
at prices of $0.50, $1.10, $0.70 and $1.63 per share, respectively, to Dr. Irwin
Kellner, a former Director of the Company, pursuant to Dr. Kellner's exercise,
on a "cashless" basis, of stock options. On January 11, 2008, the Company issued
10,445, 66,316 and 93,208 shares of restricted common stock at prices of $1.10,
$0.50 and $3.80 per share, respectively, to Mr. Sean P. Downes, Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, pursuant to Mr. Downes'
exercise, on a "cashless" basis, of stock options. Also on January 11, 2008, the
Company issued 14,359, 9,861, 67,970 and 7,785 shares of restricted common stock
at prices of $1.10, $0.70, $0.50 and $3.80 per share, respectively, to Mr. James M.
Lynch, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company,
pursuant to Mr. Lynch's exercise, on a "cashless" basis, of stock options. Also
on January 11, 2008, the Company issued 23,135, 6,574, 31,195 and 3,064 shares
of restricted common stock at prices of $0.50, $0.70, $1.00 and $1.10 per share,
respectively, to an employee, pursuant to the employee's exercise, on a
"cashless" basis, of stock options. On March 18, 2008, the Company issued 31,000
shares of restricted common stock at a price of $1.63 per share to Mr. Reed Slogoff,
a Director of the Company, pursuant to Mr. Slogoff's exercise of stock options. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2008, the aggregate
number of stock options and warrants exercised was 1,516,000. Of that total,
1,009,428 shares of common stock were issued to those individuals exercising
stock options and warrants and 506,572 shares of common stock were retained by
the Company as treasury stock, respectively. The shares retained by the Company
were in payment for the exercise price of certain options and the satisfaction
of statutory tax liability associated with such exercise.
Unless otherwise specified, such as in the case of the exercise of stock options
or warrants, the per share prices were determined using the closing price of the
Company's common stock as quoted on the American Stock Exchange ("AMEX") and the
shares were issued in private transactions pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On April 3, 2000, the Company established the Universal Insurance Holdings, Inc.
Stock Grantor Trust ("SGT") to fund its obligations arising from its various
stock option agreements. The Company funded the SGT with 2,900,000 shares of the
Company's common stock. On both April 1, 2008 and May 7, 2008, the Company's
17
Board of Directors' Compensation Committee, by unanimous written consent,
released shares from the SGT to satisfy Company obligations to issue stock
options.
On April 8, 2008, the Company released from the SGT 627,422 and 104,009 shares
of restricted common stock at prices of $.06 and $1.63 per share respectively to
Bradley I Meier, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, pursuant
to Mr. Meier's exercise of stock options on a "cashless" basis. Also on May 1,
2008, the Company released from the SGT 54,342 shares of restricted common stock
at prices of $1.63 per share to Joel M. Wilentz, a Director of the Company,
pursuant to Mr. Wilentz's exercise of stock options on a "cashless" basis. Also
on May 1, 2008, the Company released from the SGT 37,496 shares of restricted
common stock at prices of $1.63 per share to Reed J. Slogoff, a Director of the
Company, pursuant to Mr. Slogoff's exercise of stock options on a "cashless"
basis. Also on May 1, 2008, the Company released from the SGT 32,977 and 172,671
shares of restricted common stock at prices of $1.10 and $1.63 per share
respectively to Norman M. Meier, a Director of the Company, pursuant to Mr.
Meier's exercise of stock options on a "cashless" basis. The aggregate number of
shares of the Company's common stock released from the SGT on April 1, 2008 and
May 1, 2008 was 1,994,000. Of that total, 1,028,916 shares of common stock were
issued to those individuals exercising stock options and 965,084 shares of
common stock were retained by the Company as treasury shares. The shares
retained by the Company were in payment for the exercise price of certain
options and the satisfaction of statutory tax liability associated with such
exercise. Unless otherwise specified, such as in the case of the exercise of
stock options, the per share prices were determined using the closing price of
the Company's common stock as quoted on AMEX and the shares were issued in
private transactions pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as
amended.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, the aggregate number of stock
options and warrants exercised was 3,510,000 (1,516,000 new issued and 1,994,000
released from the SGT). Of that total, 2,038,344 shares of common stock were
issued to those individuals exercising stock options and warrants and 1,471,656
shares of common stock were retained by the Company as treasury shares. The
shares retained by the Company were in payment for the exercise price of certain
options and the satisfaction of statutory tax liability associated with such
exercise. The Company paid statutory tax liabilities associated with certain
exercises on behalf of officers and directors in the amounts of $3,418,470 and
$872,926 for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
in exchange for treasury shares of an equal amount.
During the six-month period ended June 30, 2008, the Company retired 965,084
shares of its common stock held as treasury stock at a cost of $4,041,705.
9. PROVISION FOR INCOME TAX EXPENSE
Federal and state income taxes decreased 7.9%23.5% to $9,040,921$16,746,065 for the three-monthsix-month
period ended March 31,June 30, 2008 from $9,813,404$21,903,263 for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June
30, 2007. Federal and state income taxes were 38.7%39.6% of pretax income for the
three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008, and 44.2%42.3% for the three-monthsix-month period ended
March 31,June 30, 2007. The decrease is primarily due to certain expenses that were not
allowed as tax deductible expenses for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2007.
The disallowance had the effect of increasing taxable income and, therefore,
income taxes, during the 2007 period. There were no similar expenses disallowed
for income tax purposes for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008.
18
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis by management of the Company's
consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in
conjunction with the Company's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and
Notes thereto.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements made by the Company's management may be considered to be
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Reform
Litigation Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on various factors
and assumptions that include known and unknown risks and uncertainties. The
words "believe," "expect," "anticipate," and "project," and similar expressions,
identify forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the
statement was made. Such statements may include, but not be limited to,
projections of revenues, income or loss, expenses, plans, as well as assumptions
relating to the foregoing. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to
risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. Future
results could differ materially from those described in forward-looking
statements as a result of the risks set forth in the following discussion and in
the section below entitled "Factors Affecting Operation Results and Market Price
of Stock," among others.
OVERVIEW
The Company is a vertically integrated insurance holding company. The Company,
through its subsidiaries, is currently engaged in insurance underwriting,
distribution and claims. UPCIC generates revenue from the collection and
investment of premiums. The Company's agency operations, which include Universal
Florida Insurance Agency and Coastal Homeowners Insurance Specialists, Inc.,
generate income from commissions. Universal Risk Advisors, Inc., the Company's
managing general agent, generates revenue through policy fee income and other
administrative fees from the marketing of UPCIC's and third-party insurance
products through the Company's distribution network and UPCIC. Universal Risk
Life Advisors, Inc. was formed to be the Company's managing general agent for
life insurance products. In addition, the
Company has formed an independent claims adjusting company, Universal Adjusting
Corporation, which adjusts UPCIC claims, and an inspection company, Universal
Inspection Corporation, which performs property inspections for homeowners'
policies underwritten by UPCIC.
Blue Atlantic Reinsurance Corporation ("BA") was incorporated in Florida on November 9, 2007 as a wholly owned
subsidiary of the Company to be a reinsurance intermediary broker. BABlue Atlantic
became licensed by the Florida Department of Financial Services as a reinsurance
intermediary broker on January 4, 2008.
The Company acquired all of the outstanding common stock of Atlas, Florida
Financial Corporation, which owned
all of the outstanding common stock of Sterling, Premium Finance Company, Inc. ("Sterling"), from the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Operating Officer for $50,000, which approximated
Sterling's book value. On March 6, 2008 the Company received approval of thethis
acquisition from the OIR. Sterling has been renamed Atlas Premium Finance
Company and commenced offering premium finance services in November 2007.
19
UPCIC has applied to write homeowners' insurance policies in five additional
states besides the State of Florida. Those states are Texas, Hawaii, Georgia,
South Carolina and North Carolina. On July 16, 2008, UPCIC was licensed to
transact insurance business within the State of South Carolina. In addition,
UPCIC filed a request with the National Flood Insurance Program ("NFIP") to
become authorized to write and service NFIP's Write Your Own Program ("WYO
Program") flood insurance policies. The WYO Program began in 1983 and is a
cooperative undertaking of the insurance industry and the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA). The WYO Program allows participating property and
casualty insurance companies to write and service theNFIP's Standard Flood
Insurance Policy in their own names. The companies receive an expense allowance
for policies written and claims processed while the federal government retains
responsibility for underwriting losses. The WYO Program operates as part of
the NFIP. The Company will not be able to begin writing WYO Program policies until the
NFIP initiates its new policy administration and reporting system, which is
currently under development and testing, and the Company demonstrates that it
complies with the new requirements.
19
The Company filed an application with OIR to open a second property and casualty
subsidiary in the State of Florida. The Company intends for this new subsidiary
to write homeowners, multi peril and inland marine coverage on homes valued in
excess of $1.0 million. UPCIC does not offer limits and coverage to those risks.
Additionally, the Company intends for the new subsidiary to write excess flood
insurance on homes valued in excess of $250,000.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Management has reassessed the critical accounting policies as disclosed in the
Company's 2007 Annual Report to Stockholders on Form 10-KSB, as amended, and determined that no
changes, additions or deletions are needed to the policies as disclosed. Also
there were no significant changes in the Company's estimates associated with
those policies.
The Company's financial statements are combined with those of its subsidiaries
and are presented on a consolidated basis in accordance with GAAP. UPCIC makes
estimates and assumptions that can have a significant effect on amounts and
disclosures reported in the Company's financial statements. The most significant
estimate relates to the reserves for property and casualty insurance unpaid
losses and loss adjustment expenses. While we believethe Company believes the estimates
are appropriate, the ultimate amounts may differ from the estimates provided.
WeThe Company regularly reviewreviews these estimates and reflectreflects any adjustment
considered necessary in ourits current results of operations.
ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION - AS OF MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2008 COMPARED WITHTO DECEMBER 31,
2007
The source of liquidity for possible claim payments consists of the collection
of net premiums after deductions for expenses, reinsurance recoverables and
short-term loans. The Company held cash and cash equivalents at March 31,June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007 of $263,860,785$276,631,041 and $214,745,606, respectively. During the
three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008, the Company purchased a US Treasury bond
at a cost of $1,584,473.$1,577,623. As of December 31, 2007, the Company held no bonds. The
Company has not had, nor does it currently have, any exposure to sub-prime
related holdings.
The Company believes that premiums will be sufficient to meet the Company's
working capital requirements for at least the next twelve months. The Company's
policy is to invest amounts considered to be in excess of current working
capital requirements. At March 31,June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company's
investments were comprised of $7,700,203$17,003,632 and $176,350,298, respectively, in
cash and overnight repurchase agreements, $256,160,582$259,627,409 and $38,395,308,
respectively, in short-term investments, $1,584,473$1,577,623 and $0, respectively, in
bonds, and $3,473,542$3,441,993 and $3,392,827, respectively, in real estate consisting of
a building purchased by UPCIC that the Company is currently using as its home
office.
The Company's Property and Equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, increased
to $1,027,184$1,032,087 as of March 31,June 30, 2008 from $874,430 as of December 31, 2007. The
increase was primarily due to the acquisition of automobiles and furniture and
fixtures.
20
As of March 31,June 30, 2008, the Company had a liability for Accounts Payable of
$3,248,280$3,834,936 as compared to $2,972,147 as of year-end 2007. The net increase in
Accounts Payable is primarily due to an increase of approximately $600,000$698,000 in
assessments payable to Citizens and a decrease of approximately $300,000 in amounts due to vendors.the FHCF. The Company's liability for
Reinsurance Payable increased approximately $39,000,000$34,544,431 to $72,963,598$68,432,781 during the three-monthsix-month
period ended March 31,June 30, 2008 from $33,888,350 as of year-end 2007 due to the timing of payments to reinsurers.2007.
The net amount payablerecoverable for Federal and state income taxes was $7,059,962$7,187,246 at
March
31,June 30, 2008. As of December 31, 2007, the Company had an overpayment of
$460,225 due to estimated income tax installment payments exceeding the
20
Company's provision for Federal and state income taxes for the 2007 tax year.
The change in the liability consisted primarily of the current year provision
for income taxes in the amount of $10,557,716 and$18,037,866, the tax benefit on the exercise
of stock options in the amount of $3,039,081.$5,706,780 and estimated income tax
installment payments of $19,059,661.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - THREESIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2008 COMPARED TO THREESIX
MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2007
Net income increased 15.6%decreased 14.8% to $14,308,316$25,506,466 for the three-monthsix-month period ended March
31,June
30, 2008 from $12,374,829$29,928,263 for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2007. The
Company's earnings per diluted share were $0.35$0.62 for the period versus $0.30$0.73 in
the same period last year. Even though there was an increase in the number of
homeowners' and dwelling fire insurance policies serviced by the Company and
gross premiums written and earned during the six-month period ending June 30,
2008, the Company experienced a decrease in net income during this period due
primarily to increases in ceded premiums earned and losses and loss adjustment
expenses incurred as described below.
In January 2007, the Florida legislatureLegislature passed a law designed to reduce
residential catastrophe reinsurance costs and requiring insurance companies to
offer corresponding rate reductions to policyholders. The new law expanded the
amount of reinsurance available from the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund
(FHCF),FHCF, which is a state-run entity
providing hurricane reinsurance to residential insurers at premiums less than
the private reinsurance market. The legislatureLegislature intended for the new law to
reduce residential insurers' reinsurance costs by allowing them to directly
replace some of their private market reinsurance with less costly FHCF
reinsurance. In addition, prices in the private reinsurance market have fallen
as reinsurers have had capital displaced by the expanded FHCF. Notwithstanding an increase in the policies in force,
grossGross premiums
written decreased 3.3%increased 2.7 percent to $126,667,669 in$269,585,900 during the first
quarter ofsix-month period ending
June 30, 2008 from $130,989,353$262,563,270 in the same period of 2007 primarily because
of a decline in premium rates.2007. As of March 31,June 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, UPCIC was servicing approximately 399,000432,000 and 374,000,
respectively, homeowners' and dwelling fire insurance policies with in-force
premiums of approximately $504,000,000$513,000,000 and $504,500,000, respectively.
UPCIC purchased the maximum additional coverage available to the Company under
the expanded FHCF, allowing UPCIC to maximize its cost savings from the new law.
UPCIC's mid-2007 rate reductions therefore reflected actual reductions in
UPCIC's operating costs. In addition, UPCIC's private reinsurance costs in 2007
and its expected costs in 2008 are lower than were included in its rates prior
to the 2007 legislation.
Because UPCIC's reduction in rate levels has been
commensurate with reduced expenses, the Company has been able to continue
increasing its in-force policies at acceptable profit margin levels.
21
The legislatureFlorida's Legislature also has implemented strategies to improve the ability of
residential structures to withstand hurricanes. New construction must meet
stronger building codes, and existing homes are eligible for an inspection
program that allows homeowners to determine how their homes may be upgraded to
mitigate storm damage. An increasing number of insureds are likely to qualify
for insurance premium discounts as new homes are built and existing homes are
retrofitted. These premium discounts result from homes' reduced vulnerability to
hurricane losses due to the mitigation efforts, which UPCIC takes into account
in its underwriting and profitability models.
Net premiums earned decreased 11.0%13.8% to $35,093,395$71,257,249 for the three-monthsix-month period
ended March 31,June 30, 2008 from $39,438,263$82,643,375 for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30,
2007. The decrease is due to a decreasean increase in direct premiums writtenearned (net of
previously discussed rate decreases and animplementation of wind mitigation
credits) and a proportionally higher increase in ceded premiums earned related
to changes in the reinsurance program as described in Note 3 - Reinsurance to
the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I,
Item 1 above.
Net investment income decreased 54.5%54.0% to $1,240,878$2,518,702 for the three-monthsix-month period
ended March 31,June 30, 2008 from $2,726,221$5,475,079 for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30,
2007. The decrease is primarily due to a lower interest rate environment during
the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008.
Commission revenue increased 191.9%41.7% to $6,867,187$13,849,219 for three-monththe six-month period ended
March 31,June 30, 2008 from $2,352,856$9,773,589 for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2007.
Commission revenue is comprised principally of the managing general agent's
policy fee income and service fee income on all new and renewal insurance
21
policies, reinsurance commission sharing agreements, and commissions generated
from agency operations. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in
reinsurance commission sharing of approximately $3.9$2.7 million and an increase in
managing general agent's policy fee income of approximately $600,000.$1.4 million.
Other revenue increased to $1,083,013$2,353,711 for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30,
2008 from $51,702$110,233 for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2007. The increase is
primarily due to fees earned on new payment plans offered to policyholders.
The Companypolicyholders by
UPCIC. UPCIC was not offering such payment plans during the 2007 period.
Net losses and LAE increased 3.0%21.6% to $12,725,862$30,242,028 for the three-monthsix-month period ended
March 31,June 30, 2008 from $12,355,583$24,866,277 for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2007. The
net loss ratio, or net losses and LAE as a percentage of net earned premiums,
were 36.3%42.4% and 31.3%30.1% during the three-monthsix-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The change in the net loss ratio is primarily attributable to
three primary factors: (1)
greater losses and LAE, on a direct basis, in the 2008 period as compared to the
2007 period;period and (2) lower net earned premium, the denominator of the ratio, due
to higher reinsurance costs in the 2008 period as compared to the 2007 period
which were mitigated by (3) less prior-year adverse
loss and LAE development in the 2008 period as comparedlower per policy premium due to the 2007 period.rate decreases and implementation of wind
mitigation credits. Although reinsurance rates have decreased, the Company's total reinsurance
costs are higher as the CompanyUPCIC purchased additional coverage in the 2008 period as
compared to the 2007 period. Losses and LAE are influenced by loss severity and
frequency. Losses and LAE, the Company'sUPCIC's most significant expenses, represent actual
payments made, net of reinsurance, and changes in estimated future net payments
to be made to or on behalf of its policyholders, including expenses required to
settle claims and losses.
Catastrophes are an inherent risk of the property-liability insurance business
which may contribute to material year-to-year fluctuations in UPCIC's and the
Company's results of operations and financial position. During the three-monthsix-month
periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, neither UPCIC nor the
Company experienced any catastrophic events. The level of catastrophe loss
22
experienced in any year cannot be predicted and could be material to the results
of operations and financial position of UPCIC and the Company. While management
believes UPCIC's and the Company's catastrophe management strategies will reduce
the severity of future losses, UPCIC and the Company continue to be exposed to
catastrophic losses, including catastrophic losses that may exceed the limits of
the Company's reinsurance program.
General and administrative expenses decreased 18.1%17.9% to $8,209,374$17,484,322 for the
three-
monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008 from $10,025,226$21,304,473 for the three-monthsix-month period
ended March 31,June 30, 2007. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was due
to several factors, including changes in commission expense and ceding
commissions. Commission expenses decreased 8.3% to $14,326,894 for the three-
month period ended March 31, 2008 from $15,628,485 for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2007. Ceding commissions earned increased by approximately
$1,600,000 to $19,475,160 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 from
$17,854,068 for the three-month period ended March 31, 2007. Thisan increase in ceding commissions was due to an increasegreater
ceded earned premiums, a decrease in the ceding commission rateinsurance expense, and a decrease in
assessment expense due to 31%
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2008 as compared to 28% for the
three-month period ended March 31, 2007. The increase in ceding commissions
decreased general and administrative expenses by an equal amount.increased collections of assessments from
policyholders.
Federal and state income taxes decreased 7.9%23.5% to $9,040,921$16,746,065 for the three-monthsix-month
period ended March 31,June 30, 2008 from $9,813,404$21,903,263 for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June
30, 2007. Federal and state income taxes were 38.7%39.6% of pretax income for the
three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008, and 44.2%42.3% for the three-monthsix-month period ended
March 31,June 30, 2007. The decrease is primarily due to certain expenses that were not
allowed as a tax deductible expense for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30,
2007. The disallowance had the effect of increasing taxable income and,
therefore, income taxes, during the 2007 period. There were no similar expenses
disallowed for income tax purposes for the six-month period ended June 30, 2008.
22
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2008 COMPARED TO THREE
MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007
Net income decreased 36.2% to $11,198,150 for the three-month period ended MarchJune
30, 2008 from $17,553,434 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2007. The
Company's earnings per diluted share were $0.28 for the period versus $0.43 in
the same period last year. Even though there was an increase in the number of
homeowners' and dwelling fire insurance policies serviced by the Company and
gross premiums written and earned during the three-month period ending June 30,
2008, the Company experienced a decrease in net income during this period due
primarily to increases in ceded premiums earned and losses and loss adjustment
expenses incurred as described below.
In January 2007, the Florida Legislature passed a law designed to reduce
residential catastrophe reinsurance costs and requiring insurance companies to
offer corresponding rate reductions to policyholders. The new law expanded the
amount of reinsurance available from the FHCF, which is a state-run entity
providing hurricane reinsurance to residential insurers at premiums less than
the private reinsurance market. The Legislature intended for the new law to
reduce residential insurers' reinsurance costs by allowing them to directly
replace some of their private market reinsurance with less costly FHCF
reinsurance. In addition, prices in the private reinsurance market have fallen
as reinsurers have had capital displaced by the expanded FHCF. Gross premiums
written increased 8.6% to $142,918,231 in the second quarter of 2008 from
$131,573,917 in the same period of 2007. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, UPCIC was servicing approximately 432,000 and 374,000, respectively,
homeowners' and dwelling fire insurance policies with in-force premiums of
approximately $513,000,000 and $504,500,000, respectively.
UPCIC purchased the maximum additional coverage available to the Company under
the expanded FHCF, allowing UPCIC to maximize its cost savings from the new law.
UPCIC's mid-2007 rate reductions therefore reflected actual reductions in
UPCIC's operating costs. In addition, UPCIC's private reinsurance costs in 2007
and its expected costs in 2008 are lower than were included in its rates prior
to the 2007 legislation.
Florida's Legislature also has implemented strategies to improve the ability of
residential structures to withstand hurricanes. New construction must meet
stronger building codes, and existing homes are eligible for an inspection
program that allows homeowners to determine how their homes may be upgraded to
mitigate storm damage. An increasing number of insureds are likely to qualify
for insurance premium discounts as new homes are built and existing homes are
retrofitted. These premium discounts result from homes' reduced vulnerability to
hurricane losses due to the mitigation efforts, which UPCIC takes into account
in its underwriting and profitability models.
Net premiums earned decreased 16.3% to $36,163,854 for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008 from $43,205,112 for the three-month period ended June 30,
2007. The decrease is due to an increase in direct premiums earned (net of
previously discussed rate decreases and implementation of wind mitigation
credits) and a proportionally higher increase in ceded premiums earned related
to changes in the reinsurance program as described in Note 3 - Reinsurance to
the Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in Part I,
Item 1 above.
Net investment income decreased 53.5% to $1,277,824 for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008 from $2,748,858 for the three-month period ended June 30,
2007. The decrease is primarily due to a lower interest rate environment during
the three-month period ended June 30, 2008.
Commission revenue decreased 5.9% to $6,982,032 for the three-month period ended
June 30, 2008 from $7,420,733 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2007.
Commission revenue is comprised principally of the managing general agent's
policy fee income and service fee income on all new and renewal insurance
policies, reinsurance commission sharing agreements, and commissions generated
from agency operations. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2008,
reinsurance commission sharing was approximately $3.5 million and managing
general agent's policy fee income was approximately $3.5 million.
23
Other revenue increased to $1,270,698 for the three-month period ended June 30,
2008 from $58,531 for the three-month period ended June 30, 2007. The increase
is primarily due to fees earned on new payment plans offered to policyholders
by UPCIC. UPCIC was not offering such payment plans during the 2007 period.
Net losses and LAE increased 40.2% to $17,516,166 for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2008 from $12,497,543 for the three-month period ended June 30,
2007. The net loss ratio, or net losses and LAE as a percentage of net earned
premiums, were 48.4% and 28.9% during the three-month periods ended June 30,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The change in the net loss ratio is primarily
attributable to (1) greater losses and LAE, on a direct basis, in the 2008
period as compared to the 2007 period and (2) lower net earned premium, the
denominator of the ratio, due to higher reinsurance costs in the 2008 period as
compared to the 2007 period and lower per policy premium due to rate decreases
and implementation of wind mitigation credits. Although reinsurance rates have
decreased, total reinsurance costs are higher as UPCIC purchased additional
coverage in the 2008 period as compared to the 2007 period. Losses and LAE are
influenced by loss severity and frequency. Losses and LAE, UPCIC's most
significant expenses, represent actual payments made, net of reinsurance, and
changes in estimated future net payments to be made to or on behalf of its
policyholders, including expenses required to settle claims and losses.
Catastrophes are an inherent risk of the property-liability insurance business
which may contribute to material year-to-year fluctuations in UPCIC's and the
Company's results of operations and financial position. During the three-month
periods ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, neither UPCIC nor the
Company experienced any catastrophic events. The level of catastrophe loss
experienced in any year cannot be predicted and could be material to the results
of operations and financial position of UPCIC and the Company. While management
believes UPCIC's and the Company's catastrophe management strategies will reduce
the severity of future losses, UPCIC and the Company continue to be exposed to
catastrophic losses, including catastrophic losses that may exceed the limits of
the Company's reinsurance program.
General and administrative expenses decreased 17.9% to $9,274,948 for the
three-month period ended June 30, 2008 from $11,292,398 for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2007. The decrease in general and administrative expenses
was due to several factors, including an increase in ceding commissions due to
greater ceded earned premiums, a decrease in insurance expense, and a decrease
in assessment expense due to increased collections of assessments from
policyholders.
Federal and state income taxes decreased 36.3% to $7,705,144 for the three-month
period ended June 30, 2008 from $12,089,859 for the three-month period ended
June 30, 2007. Federal and state income taxes were 40.8% of pre-tax income for
the three-month period ended June 30, 2008, and 40.8% for the three-month period
ended June 30, 2007. The decrease is primarily due to lower pre-tax income for
the three-month period ended June 30, 2008 than for the same period in 2007.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
OVERVIEW
The Company's primary sources of cash flow are the receipt of premiums,
commissions, policy fees, investment income, reinsurance recoverables and short-
term loans.
For the three-monthsix-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007, cash flows provided by
operating activities were $49,443,272$65,864,551 and $44,285,991,$33,448,401, respectively. Cash flows
from operating activities are expected to be positive in both the short- term
and reasonably foreseeable future. In addition, the Company's investment
portfolio is highly liquid as it consists entirely of cash, bonds, overnight
repurchase agreements and a money market account.
24
The Company believes that its current capital resources are sufficient to
support current operations and expected growth for at least twelve months.
On June 25, 2008, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the Company to
repurchase up to $3,000,000 of its shares of outstanding common stock. Under the
repurchase program, management is authorized to repurchase shares through
December 31, 2008, with block trades permitted, in open market purchases or in
privately negotiated transactions at prevailing market prices in compliance with
applicable securities laws and other legal requirements. To facilitate
repurchases, the Company plans to make purchases pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan,
which will allow the Company to repurchase its shares during periods when it
otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws. As of
June 30, 2008, the Company had repurchased 19,600 shares under its repurchase
plan at a cost of $71,117.
COMPANY BORROWINGS
In June 2005, the Company borrowed monies from two private investors and issued
two promissory notes for the aggregate principal sum of $1,000,000 payable in 10
monthly installments of $100,000. Payment on one note commenced in July 31, 2006
and commenced on the other note on November 30, 2006. As of March 28, 2007,
these loans were fully paid. The loan proceeds were subsequently contributed to
UPCIC as additional paid-in-capital. In conjunction with the notes, the Company
23
granted a warrant to one of the investors to purchase 200,000 shares of
restricted common stock at an exercise price of $.05 per share, which havehas since
been exercised. These transactions were approved by the Company's Board of
Directors.
On November 9, 2006, UPCIC entered into a $25.0 million surplus note with the
Florida State Board of Administration ("SBA") under the ICBUI Program. Under the
ICBUI Program, which was implemented by the Florida legislatureLegislature to encourage
insurance companies to write additional residential insurance coverage in
Florida, the Florida State Board of AdministrationSBA matched UPCIC's funds of $25.0 million that were earmarked for
participation in the program. The surplus note brings the current capital and
surplus of UPCIC to approximately $108.5$87.9 million. The $25.0 million is invested
in a treasury money market account.
The surplus note has a twenty-year term and accrues interest at a rate
equivalent to the 10-year U.S. Treasury Bond rate, adjusted quarterly based on
the 10-year Constant Maturity Treasury rate. For the first three years of the
term of the surplus note, UPCIC is required to pay interest only, although
principal payments can be made during this period. Any payment of principal or
interest by UPCIC on the surplus note must be approved by the Commissioner of
the OIR.
An event of default will occur under the surplus note if UPCIC: (i) defaults in
the payment of the surplus note; (ii) fails to meet at least a 2:1 ratio of net
premium to surplus ("Minimum Writing Ratio") requirement by June 1, 2007; (iii)
fails to submit quarterly filings to the OIR; (iv) fails to maintain at least
$50 million of surplus during the term of the surplus note, except for certain
situations; (v) misuses proceeds of the surplus note; (vi) makes any
misrepresentations in the application for the program; or (vii) pays any
dividend when principal or interest payments are past due under the surplus
note. As of March 31,June 30, 2008, the Company is in compliance with each of the
aforementioned loanloan's covenants except foras implemented by rules promulgated by the Minimum Writing Ratio.SBA.
If UPCIC failed to increase its writing ratio for two consecutive quarters prior
to June 1, 2007, failed to obtain the 2:1 Minimum Writing Ratio by June 1, 2007,
or drops below the 2:1 Minimum Writing Ratio once it is obtained for two
consecutive quarters, the interest rate on the surplus note will increase during
such deficiency by 25 basis points if the resulting writing ratio is between
1.5:1 and 2:1 and the interest rate will increase by 450 basis points if the
writing ratio is below 1.5:1. If the writing ratio remains below 1.5:1 for three
consecutive quarters after June 1, 2007, UPCIC must repay a portion of the
surplus note so that the Minimum Writing Ratio will be obtained for the
following quarter. As of September 30, 2007, and December 31, 2007, and March 31,
2008, the Company's net written premium to surplus ratios were 1.83:1, 1.39:1,
and 1.39:1.26:1, respectively, as defined under the terms of the surplus note
25
agreement. Under the terms of the surplus note agreement, at December 31, 2007,
the interest rate on the note was increased by 450 basis points. As of March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, the Company's net written premium to
surplus ratio, as defined under the surplus note agreement, was below 1.5:1. IfAs
of June 30, 2008, the Company's net written premium to surplus ratio remains below 1.5:1 for the quarter ended June 30,
2008, the Company will be required to repay a portion of the principal balance
under the surplus note agreement. The Company expects to meet or exceed a ratio
of 1.5:1 by June 30, 2008 and, therefore, does not expect to repay any portion
of the $25,000,000 principal balance of the surplus note during 2008. However,
there is no guaranty the Company will accomplish this.was 1.65:1. In May
2008, the Florida legislatureLegislature passed a billlaw providing participants in the Program
an opportunity to amend the terms of their surplus notes based on law changes.
The billnew law contains methods for calculating compliance with the writings ratio
requirements that might be more favorable to the Company than current law and
the terms of the existing surplus note. If the bill becomes law, theThe Company will evaluateis evaluating the
desirability of amending its surplus note to reflect these law changes.
24
To meet its matching obligation under the ICBUI Program, on November 3, 2006,
the Company entered into a Secured Promissory Note with Benfield Greig
(Holdings), Inc. in the aggregate principal amount of $12 million. Interest on
the note accrued at the rate of 12.75% per annum. The outstanding principal was
due in six monthly installments of $1.5 million and a final seventh monthly
installment of the remaining balance plus all accrued interest under the terms
of the note starting on January 31, 2007 and ending on July 31, 2007. In
connection with the loan, the Company and its subsidiaries appointed Benfield
Inc. as their reinsurance intermediary for all of their reinsurance placements
for the contract year beginning on June 1, 2007. The Company made all payments
in a timely manner and paid the final installment on July 18, 2007. Under the
terms of the Secured Promissory Note, Benfield Greig (Holdings), Inc. agreed to
refund a portion of the interest paid on the note if the Company fulfilled all
its material obligations under the related broker agreements. On July 27, 2007,
the Company received a refund of interest from Benfield Greig (Holdings), Inc.
in the amount of $280,500 that reduced the effective interest rate on the note
to 8.25% per annum.
There can be no assurance that the above described transactions will be
sufficient to ensure UPCIC's future compliance with Florida insurance laws and
regulations, or that the Company will be able to maintain profitability. Failure
by UPCIC to maintain the required level of statutory capital and surplus could
result in the suspension of UPCIC's authority to write new or renewal business,
other regulatory actions or ultimately, in the revocation of UPCIC's certificate
of authority by the OIR.
AVAILABLE CASH
The balance of cash and cash equivalents at March 31,June 30, 2008 was $263,860,785,$276,631,041, and
$256,160,582$260,154,613 of this amount is in UPCIC, most of which is available to pay
claims or relates to policyholder surplus. Accordingly, cash and cash
equivalents in UPCIC are not available to buy back Company stock or pay Company
dividends. A portion of those claims paid by the Company would be recoverable
through the Company's catastrophic reinsurance upon presentation to the
reinsurer of evidence of claim payment. As of December 31, 2007, the balance of
cash and cash equivalents was $214,745,606.
GAAP differs in some respects from reporting practices prescribed or permitted
by the OIR. To retain its certificate of authority, the Florida insurance laws
and regulations require that UPCIC maintain capital and surplus equal to the
statutory minimum capital and surplus requirement defined in the Florida
Insurance Code as the greater of 10% of the insurer's total liabilities or
$4,000,000. UPCIC's statutory capital and surplus was $108,508,141$87,862,613 at March 31,June 30,
2008 and exceeded the minimum capital and surplus requirements. UPCIC is also
required to adhere to prescribed premium-to-capital surplus ratios.
The maximum amount of dividends, which can be paid by Florida insurance
companies without prior approval of the Commissioner of the OIR, is subject to
restrictions relating to statutory surplus. The maximum dividend that may be
paid by UPCIC to the Company without prior approval is limited to the lesser of
statutory net income from operations of the preceding calendar year or statutory
unassigned surplus as of the preceding year end. Statutory unassigned surplus
(deficit) at December 31, 2007 was $35,580,159. During 2007 and the three monthsix-month period
26
ended March 31,June 30, 2008, UPCIC did not paydeclared aggregate dividends to the Company.
25
The Company of
$23,000,000.
UPCIC is required annually to comply with the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners' ("NAIC") Risk-Based Capital ("RBC") requirements. RBC
requirements prescribe a method of measuring the amount of capital appropriate
for an insurance company to support its overall business operations in light of
its size and risk profile. NAIC's RBC requirements are used by regulators to
determine appropriate regulatory actions relating to insurers who show signs of
weak or deteriorating condition. As of December 31, 2007, based on calculations
using the appropriate NAIC RBC formula, the Company'sUPCIC's reported total adjusted capital
was in excess of the requirements.
CASH DIVIDENDS
On January 23, 2008, the Company's Board of Directors declared a dividend of
$0.10 per share on its outstanding common stock. The dividend is payablewas paid on August
7, 2008 to stockholders of record as of July 9, 2008.2008 in the aggregate amount of
$3,699,116. On April 8, 2008, the Company paid a dividend of $0.09 per share of
outstanding common stock that was accrued at December 31, 2007. The aggregate
amount of the dividend was $3,329,204.
IMPACT OF INFLATION
Property and casualty insurance premiums are established before the Company
knows the amount of loss and LAE and the extent to which inflation may affect
such expenses. Consequently, the Company attempts to anticipate the future
impact of inflation when establishing rate levels. While the Company attempts to
charge adequate rates, the Company may be limited in raising its premium levels
for competitive and regulatory reasons. Inflation also affects the market value
of the Company's investment portfolio and the investment rate of return. Any
future economic changes which result in prolonged and increasing levels of
inflation could cause increases in the dollar amount of incurred loss and LAE
and thereby materially adversely affect future liability requirements.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
There were no off-balance sheet arrangements during the three-monthsix-month periods ended
March 31,June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The following table represents the Company's total contractual obligations as of
June 30, 2008 for which cash flows are fixed or determinable.
($ in thousands) Total Less than 1 year 1-3 years 4-5 years Over 5 years
- ---------------- ----- ---------------- ------------------- --------- ------------
Net liability for
unpaid losses and
loss expenses of
the insurance subsidiary 11,086 6,402 4,130 305 249$22,530 $8,674 $12,505 $ 788 $ 563
Long-term debt 25,000 2,031 2,227 20,742- 1,506 2,176 21,318
Operating leases 453 163 290
-------------------------------------------------------------------
36,539 6,565 6,451 2,532 20,991
===================================================================399 172 227 - -
--------------------------------------------------------------
$47,929 $8,846 $14,238 $2,964 $21,881
==============================================================
2627
FACTORS AFFECTING OPERATION RESULTS AND MARKET PRICE OF STOCK
The Company and its subsidiaries operate in a rapidly changing environment that
involves a number of uncertainties, some of which are beyond the Company's
control. This report contains, in addition to historical information, forward-
looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. The words "expect,"
"estimate," "anticipate," "believe," "intend," "plan" and similar expressions
and variations thereof are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The
Company's actual results could differ materially from those set forth in or
implied by any forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or
contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those
uncertainties discussed below as well as those discussed elsewhere in this
report.
NATURE OF THE COMPANY'S BUSINESS
Factors affecting the sectors of the insurance industry in which the Company
operates may subject the Company to significant fluctuations in operating
results. These factors include competition, catastrophe losses and general
economic conditions including interest rate changes, as well as legislative
initiatives, the regulatory environment, the frequency of litigation, the size
of judgments, severe weather conditions, climate changes or cycles, the role of
federal or state government in the insurance market, judicial or other
authoritative interpretations of laws and policies, and the availability and
cost of reinsurance. Specifically, the homeowners' insurance market, which
comprises the bulk of the Company's current operations, is influenced by many
factors, including state and federal laws, market conditions for homeowners'
insurance and residential plans. Additionally, an economic downturn could result
in fewer home sales and less demand for new homeowners seeking insurance.
Historically, the financial performance of the property and casualty insurance
industry has tended to fluctuate in cyclical patterns of soft markets followed
by hard markets. Although an individual insurance company's financial
performance is dependent on its own specific business characteristics, the
profitability of most property and casualty insurance companies tends to follow
this cyclical market pattern.
The Company believes that a substantial portion of its future growth will depend
on its ability, among other things, to successfully implement its business
strategy, including expanding the Company's product offering by underwriting and
marketing additional insurance products and programs through its distribution
network, further penetrating the Florida market by establishing relationships
with additional independent agents in order to expand its distribution network
and to further disperse its geographic risk and expanding into other
geographical areas outside the State of Florida. Any future growth is contingent
on various factors, including the availability of adequate capital, the
Company's ability to hire and train additional personnel, regulatory
requirements, the competitive environment, and rating agency considerations.
There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in expanding its
business, that the existing infrastructure will be able to support additional
expansion or that any new business will be profitable. Moreover, as the Company
expands its insurance products and programs and the Company's mix of business
changes, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to maintain or
improve its profit margins or other operating results. There can also be no
assurance that the Company will be able to obtain the required regulatory
approvals to offer additional insurance products. UPCIC also is required to
maintain minimum surplus to support its underwriting program. The surplus
requirement affects UPCIC's potential growth.
27
MANAGEMENT OF EXPOSURE TO CATASTROPHIC LOSSES
UPCIC is exposed to potentially numerous insured losses arising out of single or
multiple occurrences, such as natural catastrophes. As with all property and
casualty insurers, UPCIC expects to and will incur some losses related to
28
catastrophes and will price its policies accordingly. UPCIC's exposure to
catastrophic losses arises principally out of hurricanes and windstorms. Through
the use of standard industry modeling techniques that are susceptible to change,
UPCIC manages its exposure to such losses on an ongoing basis from an
underwriting perspective. UPCIC also protects itself against the risk of
catastrophic loss by obtaining reinsurance coverage as of the beginning of
hurricane season on June 1 of each year. UPCIC's reinsurance program consists of
excess of loss, quota share and catastrophe reinsurance for multiple hurricanes.
UPCIC's catastrophe reinsurance program currently covers three events, subject
to the terms and limitations of the reinsurance contracts. However, UPCIC may
not buy enough reinsurance to cover multiple storms going forward or be able to
timely obtain reinsurance. In addition, UPCIC is responsible for losses related
to catastrophic events with incurred losses in excess of coverage provided by
UPCIC's reinsurance program, and such losses could have a material adverse
effect on the business, financial condition and results of operations of UPCIC
and the Company.
RELIANCE ON THIRD PARTIES AND REINSURERS
UPCIC is dependent upon third parties to perform certain functions including,
but not limited to the purchase of reinsurance and risk management analysis.
UPCIC also relies on reinsurers to limit the amount of risk retained under its
policies and to increase its ability to write additional risks. UPCIC's
intention is to limit its exposure and therefore protect its capital, even in
the event of catastrophic occurrences, through reinsurance agreements. For the
2007 hurricane season, UPCIC's reinsurance agreements transferred the risk of
loss in excess of $45,000,000 for the first event and $9,300,000 for the second
and third events up to approximately the 150 year150-year PML as of the beginning of
hurricane season on June 1. These amounts may change in the future. ForAt the 2008start
of the hurricane season on June 1, 2008, UPCIC believes it will havehas coverage to approximately the
125-year PML and will not be able to place133-year PML. With the additional catastrophe coverage to upvia the new top layer
effective July 1, 2008, UPCIC would have had coverage to approximately the
150 year PML, as they did in 2007. The Company145-year PML. UPCIC is responsible for losses related to catastrophic events
with incurred losses in excess of coverage provided by the Company'sUPCIC's reinsurance
program, which could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business,
financial condition and results of operations should catastrophe losses exceed
these amounts.
REINSURANCE
The property and casualty reinsurance industry is subject to the same market
conditions as the direct property and casualty insurance market, and there can
be no assurance that reinsurance will be available to UPCIC to the same extent
and at the same cost as currently in place for UPCIC. Future increases in
catastrophe reinsurance costs are possible and could adversely affect UPCIC's
results. Reinsurance does not legally discharge an insurer from its primary
liability for the full amount of the risks it insures, although it does make the
reinsurer liable to the primary insurer. Therefore, UPCIC is subject to credit
risk with respect to its reinsurers. In addition, UPCIC obtains a significant
portion of its reinsurance coverage from the FHCF. There is no guaranty the FHCF
will be able to honor its obligations. In order to mitigate this contingency,
the Company will attempt in 2008 to purchase a credit protection policy as it
did in 2007 if it is affordable. However, there is no assurance that the Company
will be able to obtain such a policy on terms and conditions deemed reasonable
by management. Management evaluates the financial
condition of its reinsurers and monitors concentrations of credit risk arising
from similar geographic regions, activities, or economic characteristics of the
reinsurers to minimize its exposure to significant losses from reinsurer
insolvencies. A reinsurer's insolvency or inability to make payments under a
reinsurance treaty could have a material adverse effect on the financial
condition and profitability of UPCIC and the Company. While ceding premiums to
reinsurers reduces UPCIC's risk of exposure in the event of catastrophic losses,
it also reduces UPCIC's potential 28
for greater profits should such catastrophic
events fail to occur. The Company believes that the extent of UPCIC's
reinsurance is typical of a company of its size in the homeowners' insurance
industry.
ADEQUACY OF LIABILITIES FOR LOSSES
The liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses periodically established
by UPCIC are estimates of amounts needed to pay reported and unreported claims
and related loss adjustment expenses. The estimates necessarily will be based on
29
certain assumptions related to the ultimate cost to settle such claims. There is
an inherent degree of uncertainty involved in the establishment of liabilities
for losses and loss adjustment expenses and there may be substantial differences
between actual losses and UPCIC's liabilities estimates. UPCIC relies on
industry data, as well as the expertise and experience of independent actuaries
in an effort to establish accurate estimates and adequate liabilities.
Furthermore, factors such as storms and weather conditions, climate change and
patterns, inflation, claim settlement patterns, legislative activity and
litigation trends may have an impact on UPCIC's future loss experience.
Accordingly, there can be no assurance that UPCIC's liabilities will be adequate
to cover ultimate loss developments. The profitability and financial condition
of UPCIC and the Company could be adversely affected to the extent that its
liabilities are inadequate.
UPCIC is directly liable for loss and LAE payments under the terms of the
insurance policies that it writes. In many cases, several years may elapse
between the occurrence of an insured loss and UPCIC's payment of that loss. As
required by insurance regulations and accounting rules, UPCIC reflects its
liability for the ultimate payment of all incurred losses and LAE by
establishing a liability for those unpaid losses and LAE for both reported and
unreported claims, which represent estimates of future amounts needed to pay
claims and related expenses.
When a claim involving a probable loss is reported, UPCIC establishes a
liability for the estimated amount of UPCIC's ultimate loss and LAE payments.
The estimate of the amount of the ultimate loss is based upon such factors as
the type of loss, jurisdiction of the occurrence, knowledge of the circumstances
surrounding the claim, severity of injury or damage, potential for ultimate
exposure, estimate of liability on the part of the insured, past experience with
similar claims and the applicable policy provisions.
All newly reported claims received are set up with an initial average liability.
That claim is then evaluated and the liability is adjusted upward or downward
according to the facts and damages of that particular claim.
In addition, management provides for a liability on an aggregate basis to
provide for losses incurred but not reported. UPCIC utilizes independent
actuaries to help establish its liability for unpaid losses and LAE. UPCIC does
not discount the liability for unpaid losses and LAE for financial statement
purposes.
The estimates of the liability for unpaid losses and LAE are subject to the
effect of trends in claims severity and frequency and are continually reviewed.
As part of this process, UPCIC reviews historical data and considers various
factors, including known and anticipated legal developments, changes in social
attitudes, inflation and economic conditions. As experience develops and other
data becomebecomes available, these estimates are revised, as required, resulting in
increases or decreases to the existing liability for unpaid losses and LAE.
29
Adjustments are reflected in results of operations in the period in which they
are made and the liabilities may deviate substantially from prior estimates.
Among the classes of insurance underwritten by UPCIC, the homeowners' liability
claims historically tend to have longer time lapses between the occurrence of
the event, the reporting of the claim to UPCIC and the final settlement than do
homeowners' property claims. Liability claims often involve third parties filing
suit and the ensuing litigation. By comparison, property damage claims tend to
be reported in a relatively shorter period of time with the vast majority of
these claims resulting in an adjustment without litigation.
30
There can be no assurance that UPCIC's liability for unpaid losses and LAE will
be adequate to cover actual losses. If UPCIC's liability for unpaid losses and
LAE proves to be inadequate, UPCIC will be required to increase the liability
with a corresponding reduction in UPCIC's net income in the period in which the
deficiency is identified. Future loss experience substantially in excess of
established liability for unpaid losses and LAE could have a material adverse
effect on UPCIC's and the Company's business, results of operations and
financial condition.
GOVERNMENT REGULATION
Florida insurance companies are subject to regulation and supervision by the
OIR. The OIR has broad regulatory, supervisory and administrative powers. Such
powers relate, among other things, to the granting and revocation of licenses to
transact business; the licensing of agents (through the Florida Department of
Financial Services); the standards of solvency to be met and maintained; the
nature of, and limitations on, investments; approval of policy forms and rates;
review of reinsurance contracts; periodic examination of the affairs of
insurance companies; and the form and content of required financial statements.
Such regulation and supervision are primarily for the benefit and protection of
policyholders and not for the benefit of investors.
In addition, the Florida legislatureLegislature and the NAIC from time to time consider
proposals that may affect, among other things, regulatory assessments and
reserve requirements. The Company cannot predict the effect that any proposed or
future legislation or regulatory or administrative initiatives may have on the
financial condition or operations of UPCIC or the Company.
UPCIC will become subject to other states' laws and regulations as it seeks
authority to transact business in states other than Florida. In addition, UPCIC
may be affected by proposals for increased regulatory involvement by the federal
government.
LEGISLATIVE INITIATIVES
The State of Florida operates Citizens to provide insurance to Florida
homeowners in high-risk areas and others without private insurance options. As
of March 31,June 30, 2008, there were 1,222,8791,180,908 Citizens policies in force. In May 2007,
the State of Florida passed legislation that freezes property insurance rates
for Citizens customers at December 2006 levels through December 31, 2008 and
permits insurance customers to opt into Citizens when the price of a private
policy is 15% more than the Citizens rate, compared to the previous opt-in
threshold of 25%. In May 2008, the Florida legislatureLegislature extended a freeze on
Citizens rates through January 2010. These initiatives, together with any future
initiatives that seek to further relax eligibility requirements or reduce
premium rates for Citizens customers, could adversely affect the ability of
UPCIC and the Company to do business profitably. In addition, the Florida
legislatureLegislature in 2007 expanded the capacity of the FHCF, with the intent of
30
reducing the cost of reinsurance otherwise purchased by residential property
insurers. If the expanded FHCF coverage expires or if the law providing for the
expanded coverage is otherwise modified, the cost of UPCIC's reinsurance program
may increase, which could affect UPCIC's profitability until such time as UPCIC
can obtain approval of appropriate rate changes. State and federal legislation
relating to insurance is affected by a number of political and economic factors
that are beyond the control of UPCIC and the Company, and the Florida
legislatureLegislature and the NAIC from time to time consider proposals that may affect,
among other things, regulatory assessments and reserve requirements. The Company
cannot predict the effect that any proposed or future legislation or regulatory
or administrative initiatives may have on the financial condition or operations
of UPCIC or the Company.
31
PRODUCT PRICING
The rates charged by UPCIC generally are subject to regulatory review and
approval before they may be implemented. UPCIC periodically submits its rate
revisions to regulators as required by law or deemed by the Company and UPCIC to
be necessary or appropriate for UPCIC's business. UPCIC prepares these filings
based on objective data relating to its business and on judgment exercised by
its management or employees and by retained professionals. There is no assurance
that the objective data incorporated in UPCIC's filings based on its past
experience will be reflective of UPCIC's future business. In additional, there
is no assurance that UPCIC's business will develop consistently with the
judgments reflected in its filings. The Company and UPCIC likewise cannot be
assured that regulatory authorities will evaluate UPCIC's data and judgments in
the same manner as UPCIC. UPCIC's filings also might be affected by political or
regulatory factors outside of UPCIC's control, which might result in disapproval
of UPCIC's filings or in negotiated compromises resulting in approved rates that
differ from rates initial filed by UPCIC or that the Company and UPCIC otherwise
would consider more appropriate for its business.
DEPENDENCE ON KEY INDIVIDUALS
UPCIC's operations depend in large part on the efforts of Bradley I. Meier, who
serves as President of UPCIC. Mr. Meier has also served as President, Chief
Executive Officer and Director of the Company since its inception in November
1990. In addition, UPCIC's operations have become materially dependent on the
efforts of Sean P. Downes, who serves as Chief Operating Officer of UPCIC. Mr.
Downes has also served as Chief Operating Officer, Senior Vice President and
Director of the Company since January 2005 and as a Director of UPCIC since May
2003. The loss of the services provided by Mr. Meier or Mr. Downes could have a
material adverse effect on UPCIC's and the Company's financial condition and
results of operations.
COMPETITION
The insurance industry is highly competitive and many companies currently write
homeowners' property and casualty insurance. Additionally, the Company and its
subsidiaries must compete with companies that have greater capital resources and
longer operating histories as well as start-up companies. Increased competition
from other private insurance companies as well as Citizens could adversely
affect the Company's ability to do business profitably. Although the Company's
pricing is inevitably influenced to some degree by that of its competitors,
management of the Company believes that it is generally not in the Company's
best interest to compete solely on price, choosing instead to compete on the
basis of underwriting criteria, its distribution network and high quality
service to its agents and insureds.
FINANCIAL STABILITY RATING
Financial stability ratings are an important factor in establishing the
competitive position of insurance companies and may impact an insurance
company's sales. Demotech, Inc. maintains a letter scale financial stability
rating system ranging from A** (A double prime) to L (licensed by state
regulatory authorities). In October 2007, Demotech, Inc. has assigned UPCIC a financial stability
rating of A, which is the fourth highest of six rating levels. According to
Demotech, Inc., A ratings are assigned to insurers that have "{ellipsis} exceptional"exceptional
ability to maintain liquidity of invested assets, quality reinsurance,
acceptable financial leverage and realistic pricing while simultaneously
establishing loss and loss adjustment expense reserves at reasonable levels."
With a financial stability rating of A, the Company expects that UPCIC's
property insurance policies will be acceptable to the secondary mortgage
marketplace and mortgage lenders. The rating of UPCIC is subject to at least
annual review by, and may be revised downward by, or revoked at, the sole
discretion of, Demotech, Inc.
31
UPCIC's failure to maintain a commercially acceptable financial stability rating
could have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to retain and
attract policyholders and agents. Many of the Company's competitors have ratings
higher than that of UPCIC. A downgrade in the financial stability rating of
UPCIC could have an adverse impact on its ability to effectively compete with
other insurers with higher ratings. Additionally, a withdrawal of the rating
could cause UPCIC's insurance policies to no longer be acceptable to the
secondary marketplace and mortgage lenders, which could cause a material adverse
effect of the Company's results of operations and financial position.
Demotech, Inc. bases its ratings on factors that concern policyholders and not
upon factors concerning investor protection. Such ratings are subject to change
and are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold securities.
32
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company's market risk generally represents the risk of gain or loss that may
result from the potential change in the fair value of the Company's investment
portfolio as a result of fluctuations in prices, and interest rates and, to a lesser
extent, the Company's debt obligations. Other than the Company's purchase of a
US Treasury bond during the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008, the Company
has maintained approximately the same investment mix from December 31, 2007 to
March 31,June 30, 2008. As previously described in "Company Borrowings," the Company's
surplus note accrues interest at an adjustable rate based on the 10-
year10-year
Constant Maturity Treasury rate.
There have been no material changes to the Company's quantitative and
qualitative market risk exposures from December 31, 2007 through March 31,June 30, 2008.
33
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company carried out an evaluation under the supervision and with the
participation of the Company's management, including the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of the
period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Company's Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of March 31,June 30, 2008 to ensure that
information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports that it files
or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and
Exchange CommissionsSEC's rules and
forms. There was no change in the Company's internal controls over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by this report that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries had any reportable legal
proceedings during the three monthssix-months ended March 31,June 30, 2008. Certain claims and
complaints have been filed or are pending against the Company or one or more of
its subsidiaries with respect to various matters. In the opinion of management,
none of these lawsuits is material, and they are adequately provided for or
32
covered by insurance or, if not so covered, are without any or have little merit
or involve such amounts that if disposed of unfavorably would not have a
material adverse effect on the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
None.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
On January 2, 2008, the Company issued 15,000 shares of restricted common stock
at a price of $0.90 per share to Mr. Harris Siskind, a former Director of the
Company, pursuant to Mr. Siskind's exercise of stock options. Also on January 2,
2008, the Company issued 518,919 shares of common stock at a price of $1.00 per
share, to a private investor, pursuant to the exercise, on a "cashless" basis,
of warrants to purchase common stock. On January 7, 2008, the Company issued
9,254, 16,716, 8,955 and 75,672 shares of restricted common stock at prices of
$0.50, $1.10, $0.70 and $1.63 per share, respectively, to Dr. Irwin Kellner, a
former Director of the Company, pursuant to Dr. Kellner's exercise, on a
"cashless" basis, of stock options. On January 11, 2008, the Company issued
10,445, 66,316 and 93,208 shares of restricted common stock at prices of $1.10,
$0.50 and $3.80 per share, respectively, to Mr. Sean P. Downes, Senior Vice
President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company, pursuant to Mr. Downes'
exercise, on a "cashless" basis, of stock options. Also on January 11, 2008, the
Company issued 14,359, 9,861, 67,970 and 7,785 shares of restricted common stock
at prices of $1.10, $0.70, $0.50 and $3.80 per share, respectively, to Mr. James
M. Lynch, Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President of the Company,
pursuant to Mr. Lynch's exercise, on a "cashless" basis, of stock options. Also
on January 11, 2008, the Company issued 23,135, 6,574, 31,195 and 3,064 shares
of restricted common stock at prices of $0.50, $0.70, $1.00 and $1.10 per share,
respectively, to an employee, pursuant to the employee's exercise, on a
"cashless" basis, of stock options. On March 18, 2008, the Company issued 31,000
shares of restricted common stock at a price of $1.63 per share to Mr. Reed
Slogoff, a Director of the Company, pursuant to Mr. Slogoff's exercise of stock
options. During the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2008, the aggregate number of stock
options and warrants exercised was 1,516,000.3,510,000. Of that total, 1,009,4282,038,343 shares of
common stock were issued to those individuals exercising stock options and
warrants and 506,5721,471,657 shares of common stock were retained by the Company as
treasury stock, respectively. The shares retained by the Company were in payment
for the exercise price of certain options and the satisfaction of statutory tax
liability associated with such exercise. Unless otherwise specified, such as in
the case of the exercise of stock options or warrants, the per share prices were
determined using the closing price of the Company's common stock as quoted on
AMEX and the shares were issued in private transactions pursuant to Section 4(2)
of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
On June 25, 2008, the Company's Board of Directors authorized the Company to
repurchase up to $3,000,000 of its shares of outstanding common stock. Under the
repurchase program, management is authorized to repurchase shares through
December 31, 2008, with block trades permitted, in open market purchases or in
privately negotiated transactions at prevailing market prices in compliance with
applicable securities laws and other legal requirements. To facilitate
repurchases, the Company plans to make purchases pursuant to a Rule 10b5-1 plan,
which will allow the Company to repurchase its shares during periods when it
otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws. As of
June 30, 2008, there have been repurchases of 19,600 shares of the Company's
outstanding common stock under the Company's repurchase program.
(a) Total (b) Average (c) Total Number (d) Maximum Number
Number of Price Paid of Shares (or Units) (or Approximate Dollar
Shares (or Per Share Purchased as Part of Value) of Shares (or Units)
Units) (or Unit) Publicly Announced that May Yet be Purchased
Period Purchased ----------- Plans or Programs Under the Plans or Progams
------ --------- ----------------- --------------------------
April 1-30, 2008 - - - -
May 1-31, 2008 - - - -
$ 3,000,000
June 1-30, 2008 19,600 $ 3.63 19,600 (71,117)
------ ------ ------ -----------
Total 19,600 $ 3.63 19,600 $ 2,928,883
====== ====== ====== ===========
34
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
None.The Company held its annual meeting of stockholders on May 16, 2008 in Fort
Lauderdale, Florida. The following proposals were adopted at the meeting:
Proposal Election of two directors by holders of Series M Preferred Stock.
1A:
Name For Withheld Abstain Broker Non-Vote
---- --- -------- ------- ---------------
Bradley I. Meier 88,690 0 0 0
Norman M. Meier 88,690 0 0 0
Proposal Election of four directors by holders of Common Stock, Series A
1B: Preferred Stock. and Series M Preferred Stock, voting together as a
class.
Name For Withheld Abstain Broker Non-Vote
---- --- -------- ------- ---------------
Sean P. Downes 33,066,898 1,763,178 0 0
Reed J. Slogoff 33,555,000 1,275,076 0 0
Joel M. Wilentz 33,554,000 1,276,076 0 0
Ozzie A. Schindler 33,620,647 1,209,429 0 0
Proposal 2: Approval of the formula used to calculate the performance bonus
in the amended employment agreement of the Executive Vice President
of Blue Atlantic Reinsurance Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary
of the Company.
For Against Abstain Broker Non-Vote
--- ------- ------- ---------------
28,367,137 789,408 106,336 5,567,195
Proposal 3: Ratification of appointment of Blackman Kallick LLP as the
Company's independent registered public accounting firm for the
year ending December 31, 2008.
For Against Abstain Broker Non-Vote
--- ------- ------- ---------------
33,899,146 392,610 538,320 0
35
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION
None.
33
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
36
Exhibit No. Exhibit
- --------------------- -------
3.1 Registrant's Restated Amended and Restated Certificate
of Incorporation(1)Incorporation (1)
3.2 Certificate of Designation for Series A Convertible
Preferred Stock dated October 11, 1994(2)1994 (2)
3.3 Certificate of Designations, Preferences, and Rights
of Series M Convertible Preferred Stock dated August
13, 1997(3)1997 (3)
3.4 Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation dated October 19, 1998(2)1998 (2)
3.5 Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation dated December 18, 2000(2)2000
(2)
3.6 Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of
Designations of the Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock dated October 29, 2001(2)2001 (2)
3.7 Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation dated December 7, 2005(4)2005 (4)
3.8 Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated
Certificate of Incorporation dated May 18, 2007(4)2007 (4)
3.9 Amended and Restated Bylaws(5)Bylaws (5)
11.1 Statement Regarding Computation of Per Share Income
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as Adopted Pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer Pursuant to Title 18, United States
Code, Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
37
(1) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on
Form S-1 (File No. 33-51546) declared effective on December 14, 1992
(2) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-KSB
for the year ended December 31, 2002
(3) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Annual Report on Form
10-
KSB/10-KSB/A for the year ended April 30, 1997
(4) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form
10-
QSB10-QSB for period ended June 30, 2007
(5) Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K
dated January 8, 2007
3438
SIGNATURES
In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
UNIVERSAL INSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.
Date: May 12,August 8, 2008 /s/ Bradley I. Meier
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bradley I. Meier, President and Chief
Executive Officer
/s/ James M. Lynch
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
James M. Lynch, Chief Financial Officer
35
39