UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)



þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015



o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 1-13908

Invesco Ltd.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



Bermuda (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		98-0557567 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1555 Peachtree Street, N.E., Suite 1800, Atlanta, GA (Address of Principal Executive Offices)		30309 (Zip Code)

(404) 892-0896

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.) Yes o No þ

As of ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, the most recent practicable date, the number of Common Shares outstanding was ~~431,653,339.~~430,706,116.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We include cross references to captions elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which we refer to as this “Report,” where you can find related additional information. The following table of contents tells you where to find these captions.




	Page
TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)	3
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	3
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income	4
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income	5
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	6
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity	7
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	9
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	4237
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	9172
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	9272

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	9374
Item 1A. Risk Factors	9374
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	9374
Item 5. Other Information	9374
Item 6. Exhibits	9475
Signatures	9576
~~EX-3.2~~
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Invesco Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)


	As of				As of
$ in millions, except per share data	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	1,196.0		1,331.2		1,219.7		1,514.2
Unsettled fund receivables	1,228.8		932.4		1,361.5		732.4
Accounts receivable	517.8		500.8		561.1		545.9
Investments	919.1		839.7		951.6		885.4
Assets of consolidated sponsored investment products (CSIP)	326.8		108.5		314.2		305.8
Assets of consolidated investment products (CIP):
Cash and cash equivalents of CIP	292.4		583.6		393.9		404.0
Accounts receivable and other assets of CIP	121.7		58.3		82.1		161.3
Investments of CIP	4,971.4		4,734.7		6,198.0		5,762.8
Assets held for policyholders	1,539.9		1,416.0		2,572.7		1,697.9
Prepaid assets	108.2		101.4		126.5		132.1
Other assets	144.2		182.1		90.7		92.0
Property and equipment, net	354.8		350.8
Property, equipment and software, net					393.1		402.6
Intangible assets, net	1,258.3		1,263.7		1,362.8		1,246.7
Goodwill	6,920.1		6,867.3		6,333.3		6,579.4
Total assets	19,899.5		19,270.5		21,961.2		20,462.5
LIABILITIES
Accrued compensation and benefits	463.2		676.4		371.7		667.3
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	755.6		763.1		824.5		757.3
Liabilities of CIP:
Debt of CIP	4,301.5		4,181.7		5,479.7		5,149.6
Other liabilities of CIP	201.0		461.8		320.7		280.9
Policyholder payables	1,539.9		1,416.0		2,572.7		1,697.9
Unsettled fund payables	1,219.6		882.0		1,363.2		730.1
Long-term debt	1,588.9		1,588.6		1,600.6		1,589.3
Deferred tax liabilities, net	351.9		323.6		387.7		304.8
Total liabilities	10,421.6		10,293.2		12,920.8		11,177.2
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 11)
TEMPORARY EQUITY
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in CSIP	155.0		—		167.6		165.5
PERMANENT EQUITY
Equity attributable to common shareholders:
Common shares ($0.20 par value; 1,050.0 million authorized; 490.4 million shares issued as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013)	98.1		98.1
Equity attributable to Invesco Ltd.:
Common shares ($0.20 par value; 1,050.0 million authorized; 490.4 million shares issued as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014)					98.1		98.1
Additional paid-in-capital	6,068.8		6,100.8		6,091.2		6,133.6
Treasury shares	(1,807.5	)	(1,700.4	)	(1,936.2	)	(1,898.1	)
Retained earnings	3,617.1		3,361.9		4,077.5		3,926.0
Retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP	63.3		104.3		—		17.6
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	509.9		427.9
Total equity attributable to common shareholders	8,549.7		8,392.6
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax					(253.6	)	48.8
Total equity attributable to Invesco Ltd.					8,077.0		8,326.0
Equity attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	773.2		584.7		795.8		793.8
Total permanent equity	9,322.9		8,977.3		8,872.8		9,119.8
Total liabilities, temporary and permanent equity	19,899.5		19,270.5		21,961.2		20,462.5

See accompanying notes.

Table of Contents

Invesco Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,
$ in millions, except per share data	2014			2013			2014			2013			2015			2014
Operating revenues:
Investment management fees	1,031.9			885.5			1,997.3			1,730.1			1,001.4			965.4
Service and distribution fees	214.7			215.7			453.3			422.0			213.4			238.6
Performance fees	5.0			6.0			36.1			42.1			46.8			31.1
Other	38.3			28.3			72.7			53.5			30.0			34.4
Total operating revenues	1,289.9			1,135.5			2,559.4			2,247.7			1,291.6			1,269.5
Operating expenses:
Employee compensation	342.9			324.1			705.0			665.6			360.9			362.1
Third-party distribution, service and advisory	410.6			366.0			816.0			712.1			399.1			405.4
Marketing	30.2			23.8			53.6			46.0			26.7			23.4
Property, office and technology	75.3			68.6			188.0			135.1			76.9			112.7
General and administrative	76.1			77.3			197.7			144.8			89.9			121.6
Transaction and integration	—			1.8			—			3.2
Total operating expenses	935.1			861.6			1,960.3			1,706.8			953.5			1,025.2
Operating income	354.8			273.9			599.1			540.9			338.1			244.3
Other income/(expense):
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	5.5			6.9			15.5			15.0			11.8			10.0
Interest and dividend income	3.1			2.1			6.0			4.3			2.5			2.9
Interest expense	(18.2		)	(10.0		)	(36.9		)	(19.7		)	(18.7		)	(18.7		)
Other gains and losses, net	16.2			0.4			22.8			18.1			2.7			6.6
Other income/(loss) of CSIP, net	7.7			—			15.9			—
Other income/(expense) of CSIP, net													9.4			8.2
CIP:
Interest and dividend income of CIP	48.0			50.7			96.3			101.0			60.2			48.3
Interest expense of CIP	(30.3		)	(30.6		)	(60.6		)	(63.3		)	(45.1		)	(30.3		)
Other gains/(losses) of CIP, net	36.8			(1.6		)	63.3			(22.7		)	24.4			26.5
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	423.6			291.8			721.4			573.6			385.3			297.8
Income tax provision	(107.0		)	(83.5		)	(196.0		)	(169.8		)	(101.3		)	(89.0		)
Income from continuing operations, net of taxes	316.6			208.3			525.4			403.8			284.0			208.8
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	0.2			(4.6		)	(1.8		)	(0.5		)	—			(2.0		)
Net income	316.8			203.7			523.6			403.3			284.0			206.8
Net (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	(42.3		)	(1.1		)	(61.3		)	21.5			(24.4		)	(19.0		)
Net income attributable to common shareholders	274.5			202.6			462.3			424.8
Net income attributable to Invesco Ltd.													259.6			187.8
Earnings per share:
Basic:
Earnings per share from continuing operations		$0.63			$0.46			$1.06			$0.95			$0.60			$0.43
Earnings per share from discontinued operations		$—			($0.01	)		$—			$—			$—			$—
Basic earnings per share		$0.63			$0.45			$1.06			$0.95			$0.60			$0.43
Diluted:
Earnings per share from continuing operations		$0.63			$0.46			$1.06			$0.95			$0.60			$0.43
Earnings per share from discontinued operations		$—			($0.01	)		$—			$—			$—			$—
Diluted earnings per share		$0.63			$0.45			$1.06			$0.94			$0.60			$0.43
Dividends declared per share		$0.2500			$0.2250			$0.4750			$0.3975			$0.2500			$0.2250

See accompanying notes.

Table of Contents

Invesco Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Unaudited)

Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
$ in millions 2014 2013 2014 2013
Net income 316.8
203.7
523.6
403.3
Other comprehensive income/(loss), before tax:
Currency translation differences on investments in foreign subsidiaries 130.5
(94.3 ) 77.3
(303.9 )
Actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans (2.2 ) 0.3
(2.6 ) 6.8
Reclassification of amortization of prior service cost/(credit) into employee compensation expense (0.4 ) (0.5 ) (0.9 ) (1.0 )
Reclassification of amortization of actuarial (gain)/loss into employee compensation expense 0.6
0.7
1.2
1.4
Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) of equity method investments 3.2
(1.3 ) 7.2
(1.6 )
Unrealized (losses)/gains on available-for-sale investments 6.8
(0.3 ) 11.0
4.0
Reclassification of net (gains)/losses realized on available-for-sale investments included in other gains and losses, net (8.1 ) —
(10.8 ) (1.4 )
Other comprehensive income/(loss), before tax 130.4
(95.4 ) 82.4
(295.7 )
Income tax related to items of other comprehensive income/(loss):
Tax benefit/(expense) on foreign currency translation adjustments —
(0.3 ) —
(1.1 )
Tax on actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans 0.4
(0.1 ) 0.5
(1.5 )
Reclassification of tax on amortization of prior service cost/(credit) into income tax provision 0.1
0.1
0.2
0.2
Reclassification of tax on amortization of actuarial (gain)/loss into income tax provision (0.1 ) (0.1 ) (0.2 ) (0.3 )
Tax on net unrealized (losses)/gains on available-for-sale investments 2.0
(0.8 ) 2.2
(0.6 )
Reclassification of tax on net (gains)/losses realized on available-for-sale investments included in income tax provision (2.7 ) —
(3.4 ) (0.3 )
Total income tax benefit/(expense) related to items of other comprehensive income (0.3 ) (1.2 ) (0.7 ) (3.6 )
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax 130.1
(96.6 ) 81.7
(299.3 )
Total comprehensive income/(loss) 446.9
107.1
605.3
104.0
Comprehensive loss/(income) attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities (42.4 ) 4.9
(61.0 ) 34.2
Comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders 404.5
112.0
544.3
138.2



	Three months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2015		2014
Net income	284.0		206.8
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax:
Currency translation differences on investments in foreign subsidiaries, net of tax	(302.9	)	(53.2	)
Actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans, net of tax	—		(0.3	)
Reclassification of prior service cost/(credit) into employee compensation expense, net of tax	(1.8	)	(0.4	)
Reclassification of actuarial (gain)/loss into employee compensation expense, net of tax	0.5		0.5
Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) of equity method investments, net of tax	1.1		4.0
Unrealized (losses)/gains on available-for-sale investments, net of tax	1.2		4.4
Reclassification of net (gains)/losses realized on available-for-sale investments included in other gains and losses, net, net of tax	(0.5	)	(3.4	)
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	(302.4	)	(48.4	)
Total comprehensive income/(loss)	(18.4	)	158.4
Comprehensive loss/(income) attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	(24.4	)	(18.6	)
Comprehensive income/(loss) attributable to Invesco Ltd.	(42.8	)	139.8

See accompanying notes.

Table of Contents

Invesco Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)


	Six months ended June 30,				Three months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2014		2013		2015		2014
Operating activities:
Net income	523.6		403.3		284.0		206.8
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:
Amortization and depreciation	45.8		44.2		22.7		23.4
Share-based compensation expense	70.0		69.4		40.7		36.5
(Gain)/loss on disposal of business, property and equipment, net	—		0.5
Other (gains)/losses, net	(22.8	)	(18.1	)	(2.7	)	(6.6	)
Other (gains)/losses of CSIP, net	(11.5	)	—		(6.4	)	(6.5	)
Other (gains)/losses of CIP, net	(63.3	)	22.7		(24.4	)	(26.5	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	(15.5	)	(15.0	)	(11.8	)	(10.0	)
Dividends from unconsolidated affiliates	15.4		1.9		0.7		0.8
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase)/decrease in cash held by CIP	260.1		(76.0	)	9.4		(196.4	)
(Increase)/decrease in cash held by CSIP	(1.0	)	—		(8.8	)	0.3
(Purchase)/sale of trading investments, net	(10.4	)	0.6		(39.5	)	7.8
(Increase)/decrease in receivables	(402.7	)	(711.9	)	(1,632.9	)	(520.9	)
Increase/(decrease) in payables	162.6		534.0		1,312.7		272.1
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities	550.3		255.6		(56.3	)	(219.2	)
Investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment	(49.8	)	(40.3	)
Purchase of property, equipment and software					(23.0	)	(21.4	)
Purchase of available-for-sale investments	(112.5	)	(25.2	)	(34.3	)	(1.8	)
Sale of available-for-sale investments	75.1		23.0		9.8		10.3
Purchase of investments by CIP	(2,848.8	)	(2,504.3	)	(1,286.6	)	(1,325.1	)
Sale of investments by CIP	2,108.5		2,584.6		960.6		970.1
Purchase of investments by CSIP	(476.1	)	—		(159.1	)	(246.9	)
Sale of investments by CSIP	274.3		—		166.7		95.3
Purchase of other investments	(67.5	)	(164.6	)	(51.9	)	(44.1	)
Sale of other investments	40.3		39.7		36.6		15.3
Returns of capital and distributions from unconsolidated partnership investments	25.9		9.9		14.7		3.8
Acquisition earn-out payments	—		(1.2	)
Sale of business	60.8		—
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities	(969.8	)	(78.4	)	(366.5	)	(544.5	)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from exercises of share options	5.2		10.8		0.7		1.5
Purchases of treasury shares	(169.6	)	(120.5	)	(76.6	)	(119.6	)
Dividends paid	(207.1	)	(178.4	)	(108.1	)	(98.0	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation	17.6		16.7		13.0		13.9
Repayment on unsettled fund account	(35.7	)	—
Repayment of unsettled fund account					—		(35.7	)
Third-party capital invested into CIP	155.8		34.5		12.9		40.1
Third-party capital distributed by CIP	(68.0	)	(128.1	)	(33.9	)	(48.6	)
Third-party capital invested into CSIP	152.5		—		0.8		100.8
Third-party capital distributed by CSIP	(1.4	)	—
Borrowings of debt by CIP	715.0		409.4		935.9		715.0
Repayments of debt by CIP	(295.5	)	(364.7	)	(577.0	)	(161.1	)
Net borrowings/(repayments) under credit facility	—		259.5		11.2		—
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities	268.8		(60.8	)	178.9		408.3
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(150.7	)	116.4		(243.9	)	(355.4	)
Foreign exchange movement on cash and cash equivalents	15.5		(35.7	)	(50.6	)	2.9
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	1,331.2		835.5		1,514.2		1,331.2
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	1,196.0		916.2		1,219.7		978.7
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid	(23.6	)	(16.4	)	(12.7	)	(1.4	)
Interest received	3.2		2.0		1.3		1.6
Taxes paid	(155.1	)	(141.9	)	(89.6	)	(90.2	)

See accompanying notes.

Table of Contents

Invesco Ltd.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

(Unaudited)


	Equity Attributable to Common Shareholders																	Equity Attributable to Invesco Ltd.
$ in millions	Common Shares	Additional Paid-in-Capital		Treasury Shares		Retained Earnings		Retained Earnings Appropriated for Investors in CIP		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income	Total Equity Attributable to Common Shareholders		Nonredeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Entities		Total Permanent Equity		Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in CSIP/Temporary Equity	Common Shares	Additional Paid-in-Capital		Treasury Shares		Retained Earnings		Retained Earnings Appropriated for Investors in CIP		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)		Total Equity Attributable to Invesco Ltd.		Nonredeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Entities		Total Permanent Equity		Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in CSIP/Temporary Equity
January 1, 2014	98.1	6,100.8		(1,700.4	)	3,361.9		104.3		427.9	8,392.6		584.7		8,977.3		—
January 1, 2015																		98.1	6,133.6		(1,898.1	)	3,926.0		17.6		48.8		8,326.0		793.8		9,119.8		165.5
Adjustment for adoption of ASU 2014-13																		—	—		—		—		(17.6	)	—		(17.6	)	—		(17.6	)	—
January 1, 2015, as adjusted																		98.1	6,133.6		(1,898.1	)	3,926.0		—		48.8		8,308.4		793.8		9,102.2		165.5
Net income	—	—		—		462.3		—		—	462.3		56.3		518.6		5.0	—	—		—		259.6		—		—		259.6		22.3		281.9		2.1
Other comprehensive income/(loss)	—	—		—		—		—		82.0	82.0		(0.3	)	81.7		—
Net income/(loss) reclassified to appropriated retained earnings	—	—		—		—		(40.0	)	—	(40.0	)	40.0		—		—
Deconsolidation of CIP	—	—		—		—		(1.0	)	—	(1.0	)	—		(1.0	)	—
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax																		—	—		—		—		—		(302.4	)	(302.4	)	—		(302.4	)	—
Change in noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net	—	—		—		—		—		—	—		92.5		92.5		150.0	—	—		—		—		—		—		—		(20.3	)	(20.3	)	—
Dividends	—	—		—		(207.1	)	—		—	(207.1	)	—		(207.1	)	—	—	—		—		(108.1	)	—		—		(108.1	)	—		(108.1	)	—
Employee share plans:
Share-based compensation	—	70.0		—		—		—		—	70.0		—		70.0		—	—	40.7		—		—		—		—		40.7		—		40.7		—
Vested shares	—	(115.7	)	115.7		—		—		—	—		—		—		—	—	(95.8	)	95.8		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Exercise of options	—	(3.9	)	9.1		—		—		—	5.2		—		5.2		—	—	(0.3	)	1.0		—		—		—		0.7		—		0.7		—
Tax impact of share-based payment	—	17.6		—		—		—		—	17.6		—		17.6		—	—	13.0		—		—		—		—		13.0		—		13.0		—
Purchase of shares	—	—		(231.9	)	—		—		—	(231.9	)	—		(231.9	)	—	—	—		(134.9	)	—		—		—		(134.9	)	—		(134.9	)	—
June 30, 2014	98.1	6,068.8		(1,807.5	)	3,617.1		63.3		509.9	8,549.7		773.2		9,322.9		155.0
March 31, 2015																		98.1	6,091.2		(1,936.2	)	4,077.5		—		(253.6	)	8,077.0		795.8		8,872.8		167.6

See accompanying notes.

Table of Contents

Invesco Ltd.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity (continued)

(Unaudited)


	Equity Attributable to Common Shareholders																	Equity Attributable to Invesco Ltd.
$ in millions	Common Shares	Additional Paid-in-Capital		Treasury Shares		Retained Earnings		Retained Earnings Appropriated for Investors in CIP		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total Equity Attributable to Common Shareholders		Nonredeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Entities		Total Permanent Equity		Common Shares	Additional Paid-in-Capital		Treasury Shares		Retained Earnings		Retained Earnings Appropriated for Investors in CIP		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income		Total Equity Attributable to Invesco Ltd.		Nonredeemable Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Entities		Total Permanent Equity		Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests in CSIP/Temporary Equity
January 1, 2013	98.1	6,141.0		(1,382.9	)	2,801.3		128.8		530.5		8,316.8		732.2		9,049.0
January 1, 2014																		98.1	6,100.8		(1,700.4	)	3,361.9		104.3		427.9		8,392.6		584.7		8,977.3		—
Net income	—	—		—		424.8		—		—		424.8		(21.5	)	403.3		—	—		—		187.8		—		—		187.8		17.1		204.9		1.9
Other comprehensive income/(loss)	—	—		—		—		—		(286.6	)	(286.6	)	(12.7	)	(299.3	)	—	—		—		—		—		(48.0	)	(48.0	)	(0.4	)	(48.4	)	—
Net income/(loss) reclassified to appropriated retained earnings	—	—		—		—		(30.8	)	—		(30.8	)	30.8		—		—	—		—		—		(30.3	)	—		(30.3	)	30.3		—		—
Deconsolidation of CIP	—	—		—		—		—		—		—		(27.7	)	(27.7	)
Change in noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities, net	—	—		—		—		—		—		—		(111.6	)	(111.6	)	—	—		—		—		—		—		—		(5.9	)	(5.9	)	100.0
Dividends	—	—		—		(178.4	)	—		—		(178.4	)	—		(178.4	)	—	—		—		(98.0	)	—		—		(98.0	)	—		(98.0	)	—
Employee share plans:
Share-based compensation	—	69.4		—		—		—		—		69.4		—		69.4		—	36.5		—		—		—		—		36.5		—		36.5		—
Vested shares	—	(167.7	)	167.7		—		—		—		—		—		—		—	(105.8	)	105.8		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Exercise of options	—	(13.2	)	24.0		—		—		—		10.8		—		10.8		—	(1.1	)	2.6		—		—		—		1.5		—		1.5		—
Tax impact of share-based payment	—	16.7		—		—		—		—		16.7		—		16.7		—	13.9		—		—		—		—		13.9		—		13.9		—
Purchase of shares	—	—		(178.2	)	—		—		—		(178.2	)	—		(178.2	)	—	—		(176.3	)	—		—		—		(176.3	)	—		(176.3	)	—
June 30, 2013	98.1	6,046.2		(1,369.4	)	3,047.7		98.0		243.9		8,164.5		589.5		8,754.0
March 31, 2014																		98.1	6,044.3		(1,768.3	)	3,451.7		74.0		379.9		8,279.7		625.8		8,905.5		101.9

See accompanying notes.

Table of Contents

Invesco Ltd.

Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Corporate Information

Invesco Ltd. (Parent) and all of its consolidated entities (collectively, the company or Invesco) provide retail and institutional clients with an array of global investment management capabilities. The company operates globally and its sole business is investment management.

Certain disclosures included in the company's annual report are not required to be included on an interim basis in the company's quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q. The company has condensed or omitted the disclosures. Therefore, this Form 10-Q (Report) should be read in conjunction with the company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013.~~2014.

Basis of Accounting and Consolidation

The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, the ~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements~~financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are necessary for the fair ~~presentation~~statement of the financial condition and results of operations for the periods presented. All significant intercompany transactions, balances, revenues and expenses are eliminated upon consolidation.

The company provides investment management services to, and has transactions with, various private equity funds, real estate funds, fund-of-funds, collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), and other investment products sponsored by the company in the normal course of business for the investment of client assets. The company serves as the investment manager, making day-to-day investment decisions concerning the assets of these products. Certain of these entities, typically CLOs and funds that are structured as partnership entities (such as private equity funds, real estate funds, and fund-of-funds), are considered to be variable interest entities (VIEs) if the VIE criteria are met, otherwise, they are considered to be voting interest entities (VOEs). A VIE, in the context of the company and its managed funds, is a fund that does not have sufficient equity to finance its operations without additional subordinated financial support, or a fund for which the risks and rewards of ownership are not directly linked to voting interests.

The Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and consolidate the financial statements of the Parent and all of its controlled subsidiaries. Additionally, the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the consolidation of certain managed funds that meet the definition of a VIE if the company has been deemed to be the primary beneficiary of those funds, any non-VIE general partnership or similar investments where the company is deemed to have control, and other managed investment products in which the company has a controlling financial interest. Control is deemed to be present when the Parent holds a majority voting interest or otherwise has the power to govern the financial and operating policies of the subsidiary managed fund so as to obtain the majority of the benefits from its activities. The company is generally considered to have a controlling financial interest in a managed fund when it owns a majority of the fund's outstanding shares, which may arise as a result of a seed money investment in a newly launched investment product from the time of initial launch to the time that the fund becomes majority-held by third-party investors, or in certain cases until the time that the company's investment becomes non-substantive.

Investment products that are consolidated are referred to in this Report as Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products (CSIP), which generally include consolidated sponsored investment products in which Invesco holds the majority of the voting rights or partnerships in which the company has substantive equity at risk but in which the other investors lack removal or liquidation rights, or Consolidated Investment Products (CIP), which includes consolidated nominally-held investment products. The distinction is important, as it differentiates the company's economic risk associated with each type of consolidated managed fund. The company's economic risk with respect to each investment in a CSIP and a CIP is limited to its equity ownership and any uncollected management fees. Gains and losses arising from nominally-held CIP do not have a significant impact on the company's results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. Gains and losses arising from majority-held CSIP could have a significant impact on the company's results of operations, as the company has greater economic risk associated with its investment. See Note 12, "Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products," and Note 13~~, "Consolidated Investment Products," for additional information regarding the impact of consolidation of investment products.~~

Noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities and retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP represent the interests in certain entities consolidated by the company either because the company has control over the entity or has determined that it is the primary beneficiary, but of which the company does not own all of the entity's equity. To the extent that noncontrolling interests represent equity which is redeemable or convertible for cash or other assets at the option of the equity

~~Table of Contents~~

holder, as is the case with the CSIP noncontrolling interests, these are deemed to represent temporary equity, and are classified as equity attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests in CSIPs in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Nonredeemable noncontrolling interests are classified as a component of permanent equity.

~~Use of Estimates~~

In preparing the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported revenues, expenses, assets, liabilities, and disclosure of contingent liabilities. The primary estimates and assumptions made relate to goodwill and intangible impairment, certain investments which are carried at fair value, and taxes. Additionally, estimation is involved when determining investment and debt valuation for certain CIP; however, changes in the fair values of these amounts are largely offset by noncontrolling interests. Use of available information and application of judgment are inherent in the formation of estimates. Actual results in the future could differ from such estimates and the differences may be material to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~February 2013,~~May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (ASU 2013-02). ASU 2013-02 amends Topic 220 to require an entity to present current period reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income and other amounts of current-period other comprehensive income, separately, for each component of other comprehensive income. ASU 2013-02 also requires an entity to provide information about the effects on net income of significant amounts reclassified out of each component of accumulated other comprehensive income, if those amounts are required under other Topics to be reclassified to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. The amendments to Topic 220 made by ASU 2013-02 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2012 and are reflected in these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)~~ 2014-09, ~~Revenue~~"Revenue from Contracts with ~~Customers,~~Customers" (ASU 2014-09), which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. ~~The~~ ASU 2014-09 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016, and requires either a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adoption. Early adoption is not permitted. The company is currently evaluating the potential impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the available transition methods.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2014-13, "Measuring the Financial Assets and the Financial Liabilities of a Consolidated Collateralized Financing Entity" (ASU 2014-13). ASU 2014-13 provides a measurement alternative for an entity that consolidates a collateralized financing entity (CFE) and has elected the fair value option for the financial assets and financial liabilities of such CFE. The measurement alternative requires that the reporting entity measure both the financial assets and the financial liabilities of the CFE by using the more observable of the fair value of the financial assets and the fair value of the financial liabilities, removing any measurement difference previously recorded as net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities and as an adjustment to retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP. On January 1, 2015 the company adopted ASU 2014-13 on a modified retrospective basis and has elected the measurement alternative for the consolidated CLOs. The adoption resulted in a $17.6 million reduction in retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP, with a corresponding increase in debt of CIP. The company’s subsequent earnings from consolidated CLOs reflect changes in fair value of its own economic interests in the CLOs. Gains or losses on assets and liabilities of the CLOs will no longer be attributed to noncontrolling interests but will offset in other gains/(losses) of CIP.

In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2015-02, “Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (ASU 2015-02). This standard modifies existing consolidation guidance for reporting organizations that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. ASU 2015-02 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015, and requires either a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adoption. Early adoption is permitted. The company is currently evaluating the potential impact of this standard on its Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the available transition methods.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" (ASU 2015-03), which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in the balance sheet. ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of the related debt liability rather than being presented as an asset. Amortization of debt issuance costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. ASU 2015-03 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015, and

Table of Contents

requires retrospective application for each prior period presented. Early adoption is permitted. The company is currently evaluating the potential impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

2. FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The carrying value and fair value of financial instruments are presented in the below summary table. The fair value of financial instruments held by CSIP and CIP is presented in Note 12, "Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products" and Note 13,, "Consolidated Investment Products," respectively.


		June 30, 2014				December 31, 2013					March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
$ in millions	Footnote Reference	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Footnote Reference	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents		1,196.0		1,196.0		1,331.2		1,331.2			1,219.7		1,219.7		1,514.2		1,514.2
Available-for-sale investments	3	293.7		293.7		244.1		244.1		3	277.5		277.5		255.9		255.9
Trading investments	3	278.2		278.2		253.0		253.0		3	300.2		300.2		263.2		263.2
Foreign time deposits *	3	28.4		28.4		28.8		28.8		3	30.5		30.5		29.6		29.6
Assets held for policyholders		1,539.9		1,539.9		1,416.0		1,416.0			2,572.7		2,572.7		1,697.9		1,697.9
Policyholder payables *		(1,539.9	)	(1,539.9	)	(1,416.0	)	(1,416.0	)		(2,572.7	)	(2,572.7	)	(1,697.9	)	(1,697.9	)
Put option contracts											7.4		7.4		—		—
UIT-related financial instruments sold, not yet purchased		(1.9	)	(1.9	)	(1.7	)	(1.7	)		(2.9	)	(2.9	)	(1.4	)	(1.4	)
Note payable		(0.3	)	(0.3	)	(0.3	)	(0.3	)
Long-term debt *	4	(1,588.9	)	(1,666.4	)	(1,588.6	)	(1,544.7	)	4	(1,600.6	)	(1,749.6	)	(1,589.3	)	(1,695.8	)

____________


*	These financial instruments are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis. See the indicated footnotes or most recently filed Form 10-K for additional information about the carrying and fair values of these financial instruments. Foreign time deposits are measured at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair value, and are accordingly classified as Level 2 securities.

A three-level valuation hierarchy exists for disclosure of fair value measurements based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows:

Level 1 - inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 - inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.

Level 3 - inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.

An asset or liability's categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

There are three types of valuation approaches: a market approach, which uses observable prices and other relevant information that is generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities; an income approach, which uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single, discounted present value amount; and a cost approach, which is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset.

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for assets and liabilities measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such assets and liabilities pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.

Cash equivalents

Cash investments in money market funds are valued under the market approach through the use of quoted market prices in an active market, which is the net asset value of the underlying funds, and are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

Available-for-sale investments

Available-for-sale investments include seed money, co-investments in affiliated collateralized loan obligations (CLOs), and investments in other debt securities. Available-for-sale investments are measured at fair value. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of available-for-sale investments are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax, until the investment is sold or otherwise disposed of, or if the investment is determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, at which time the cumulative gain or loss previously reported in equity is included in income. The specific identification method is used to determine the realized gain or loss on securities sold or otherwise disposed.

Table of Contents

~~Available-for-sale investments~~

Seed money is valued under the market approach through the use of quoted market prices available in an active market and is classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy; there is no modeling or additional information needed to arrive at the fair values of these investments. CLO assets are valued based on price quotations provided by an independent third-party pricing source or using an income approach through the use of certain observable and unobservable inputs. At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, investments in CLOs were valued using third-party pricing information. Due to liquidity constraints within the market for CLO products that require the use of unobservable inputs, these investments are classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. Other debt securities are valued using a cost valuation technique due to the lack of available cash flow and market data and are accordingly also classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy.

Trading investments

Trading investments include investments held to settle the company’s deferred compensation plan liabilities, certain seed money, as well as trading and investing activities in equity and debt securities entered into in its capacity as sponsor of UITs, and other equity securities. Trading securities are securities bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term. Trading investments are measured at fair value. Gains or losses arising from changes in the fair value of trading investments are included in income.

•Investments related to deferred compensation plans

Investments related to deferred compensation plans are valued under the market approach through the use of quoted prices in an active market and are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy.

•Seed money

•Other equity securities

Other equity securities consist of investments in publicly-traded equity securities. These securities are valued under the market approach through the use of quoted prices on an exchange. To the extent these securities are actively traded, valuation adjustments are not applied and they are categorized within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy; otherwise, they are categorized in level 2.

•UIT-related equity and debt securities

The company invests in UIT-related equity and debt securities consisting of investments in corporate stock, UITs, and U.S. state and political subdivision securities. Each is discussed more fully below.

Corporate equities

The company temporarily holds investments in corporate equities for purposes of creating a UIT. Corporate equities are valued under the market approach through use of quoted prices on an exchange. To the extent these securities are actively traded, valuation adjustments are not applied and they are categorized within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy; otherwise, they are categorized in level 2.

UITs

The company may hold units of its sponsored UITs at period-end for sale in the primary market or secondary market. Equity UITs are valued under the market approach through use of quoted prices on an exchange. Fixed income UITs are valued using recently executed transaction prices, market price quotations (where observable), bond spreads, or credit default swap spreads. The spread data used is for the same maturities as the underlying bonds. If the spread data does not reference the issuers, then data that references comparable issuers is used. When observable price quotations are not available, fair value is determined based on cash flow models with yield curves, bond or single name credit default spreads, and recovery rates based on collateral value as key inputs. Depending on the nature of the inputs, these investments are categorized as level 1, 2, or 3.

Municipal securities

Municipal securities are valued using recently executed transaction prices, market price quotations (where observable), bond spreads, or credit default swap spreads. The spread data used is for the same maturities as the underlying bonds. If the spread data does not reference the issuers, then data that references comparable issuers is used. When observable price quotations are not available, fair value is determined based on cash flow models with

Table of Contents

yield curves, bond or single name credit default spreads, and recovery rates based on collateral value as key inputs. Depending on the nature of the inputs, these investments are categorized as level 1, 2, or 3.

Put option contracts

The company has purchased several put option contracts to hedge economically foreign currency risk on the translation of a portion of its pound sterling-denominated earnings into U.S. dollars (purchases of $6.8 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015). These were the only contracts entered into during the period to hedge economically foreign currency risk and provide coverage through December 31, 2015. The economic hedge is predominantly triggered upon the impact of a significant decline in the pound sterling/U.S. dollar foreign exchange rate, which could arise as a result of European economic uncertainty. Open put option contracts are marked-to-market through earnings, which are recorded in the company's Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income in other gains and losses. These derivative contracts are valued using option valuation models and are included in other assets in the company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The significant inputs in these models (volatility, forward points and swap curves) are readily available in public markets or can be derived from observable market transactions for substantially the full terms of the contracts and are classified within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. The company recognized $0.6 million gain in the three months ended March 31, 2015 (March 31, 2014: none) related to the change in market value of these put option contracts.

Assets held for policyholders

Assets held for policyholders represent investments held by one of the company’s subsidiaries, which is an insurance entity that was established to facilitate retirement savings plans in the U.K. The assets held for policyholders are accounted for at fair value pursuant to ASC Topic 944, “Financial Services — Insurance,” and are comprised primarily of affiliated unitized funds. The assets are measured at fair value under the market approach based on the quoted prices of the underlying funds in an active market and are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. The policyholder payables are indexed to the value of the assets held for policyholders and are therefore not included in the tables below.

~~Table of Contents~~

UIT-related financial instruments sold, not yet purchased, and derivative instruments

The company uses U.S. Treasury futures, which are types of derivative financial instruments, to hedge economically fixed income UIT inventory and securities in order to mitigate market risk. Open futures contracts are marked-to-market daily through earnings, which are recorded in the company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income in other revenue, along with the mark-to-market on the underlying trading securities held. Fair values of derivative contracts in an asset position are included in other assets in the company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Fair values of derivative contracts in a liability position are included in other liabilities in the company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. These derivative contracts are valued under the market approach through use of quoted prices in an active market and are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 there were 931 futures contracts with a notional value of ~~$1.2~~$4.3 million (December 31, ~~2013:~~ 22014: 6 open futures contracts with a notional value of ~~$0.3 million~~)0.8 million). Additionally, to hedge economically the market risk associated with equity and debt securities and UITs temporarily held as trading investments, the company will hold short corporate equities, exchange-traded funds, or U.S. treasury security positions. These transactions are recorded as financial instruments sold, not yet purchased and are included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. To the extent these securities are actively traded, valuation adjustments are not applied and they are categorized within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy; otherwise, they are categorized in level 2.

Table of Contents

The following table presents, for each of the hierarchy levels described above, the carrying value of the company's assets and liabilities, including major security type for equity and debt securities, which are measured at fair value on the company's Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015:


	As of June 30, 2014							As of March 31, 2015
$ in millions	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	408.5		408.5		—	—		232.4		232.4		—	—
Investments:*
Available-for-sale:
Seed money	283.3		283.3		—	—		268.7		268.7		—	—
CLOs	4.1		—		—	4.1		2.5		—		—	2.5
Other debt securities	6.3		—		—	6.3		6.3		—		—	6.3
Trading investments:
Investments related to deferred compensation plans	246.9		246.9		—	—		179.2		179.2		—	—
Seed money								77.7		77.7		—	—
Other equity securities	25.8		25.8		—	—		26.3		26.3		—	—
UIT-related equity and debt securities:
Corporate equities	1.9		1.9		—	—		1.0		1.0		—	—
Corporate bonds								0.6		—		0.6	—
UITs	0.7		0.7		—	—		5.3		5.3		—	—
Municipal securities	2.9		—		2.9	—		10.1		—		10.1	—
Assets held for policyholders	1,539.9		1,539.9		—	—		2,572.7		2,572.7		—	—
Put option contracts								7.4		—		7.4	—
Total	2,520.3		2,507.0		2.9	10.4		3,390.2		3,363.3		18.1	8.8
Liabilities:
UIT-related financial instruments sold, not yet purchased:
Corporate equities	(1.9	)	(1.9	)	—	—		(1.2	)	(1.2	)	—	—
Note payable	(0.3	)	—		—	(0.3	)
U.S. treasury securities								(1.7	)	(1.7	)	—	—
Total	(2.2	)	(1.9	)	—	(0.3	)	(2.9	)	(2.9	)	—	—

____________


*	Foreign time deposits of ~~$28.4~~$30.5 million are excluded from this table. Equity method and other investments of ~~$313.2~~$335.1 million and ~~$5.6~~$8.3 million, respectively, are also excluded from this table. These investments are not measured at fair value, in accordance with applicable accounting standards.

1314

Table of Contents


	As of December 31, 2013							As of December 31, 2014
$ in millions	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	447.8		447.8		—	—		474.9		474.9		—	—
Investments:*
Available-for-sale:
Seed money	233.8		233.8		—	—		246.2		246.2		—	—
CLOs	4.0		—		—	4.0		3.4		—		—	3.4
Other debt securities	6.3		—		—	6.3		6.3		—		—	6.3
Trading investments:
Investments related to deferred compensation plans	249.7		249.7		—	—		162.6		162.6		—	—
Seed Money								68.2		68.2		—	—
Other equity securities								29.0		29.0		—	—
UIT-related equity and debt securities:
Corporate equities	2.1		2.1		—	—		1.4		1.4		—	—
UITs	1.2		1.2		—	—		1.6		1.6		—	—
Municipal securities								0.4		—		0.4	—
Assets held for policyholders	1,416.0		1,416.0		—	—		1,697.9		1,697.9		—	—
Total	2,360.9		2,350.6		—	10.3		2,691.9		2,681.8		0.4	9.7
Liabilities:
UIT-related financial instruments sold, not yet purchased:
Corporate equities	(1.7	)	(1.7	)	—	—		(1.4	)	(1.4	)	—	—
Note payable	(0.3	)	—		—	(0.3	)
Total	(2.0	)	(1.7	)	—	(0.3	)	(1.4	)	(1.4	)	—	—

____________


*	Foreign time deposits of ~~$28.8~~$29.6 million are excluded from this table. Equity method and other investments of ~~$308.2~~$332.1 million and ~~$5.6~~$4.6 million, respectively, are also excluded from this table. These investments are not measured at fair value, in accordance with applicable accounting standards.

1415

Table of Contents

The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value measurements for level 3 assets and liabilities during the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014, which are valued using significant unobservable inputs:


	Three months ended June 30, 2014					Six months ended June 30, 2014					Three months ended March 31, 2015			Three months ended March 31, 2014
$ in millions	CLOs		Other Debt Securities	Note Payable		CLOs		Other Debt Securities	Note Payable		CLOs		Other Debt Securities	CLOs		Other Debt Securities
Beginning balance	4.3		6.3	(0.3	)	4.0		6.3	(0.3	)	3.4		6.3	4.0		6.3
Returns of capital	—		—	—		(0.2	)	—	—		(0.1	)	—	(0.2	)	—
Net unrealized gains and losses included in other gains and losses*	—		—	—		—		—	—
Net unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)*	(0.2	)	—	—		0.3		—	—		—		—	0.5		—
Disposition											(0.8	)	—	—		—
Ending balance	4.1		6.3	(0.3	)	4.1		6.3	(0.3	)	2.5		6.3	4.3		6.3

Three months ended June 30, 2013 Six months ended June 30, 2013
$ in millions CLOs Other Debt Securities Note Payable CLOs Other Debt Securities Note Payable
Beginning balance 2.4
6.3
(2.4 ) 2.4
6.3
(3.4 )
Settlements (0.1 ) —
1.0
(0.1 ) —
1.7
Net unrealized gains and losses included in other gains and losses* —
—
—
—
—
0.1
Net unrealized gains and losses included in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)*
0.1
—
—
0.1
—
—
Foreign exchange gains/(losses) —
—
0.2
—
—
0.4
Ending balance 2.4
6.3
(1.2 ) 2.4
6.3
(1.2 )

_______________

* These unrealized gains and losses are attributable to balances still held at the respective period ends.

3. INVESTMENTS

The disclosures below include details of the company's investments. Investments held by CSIP are detailed in Note 12, "Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products." Investments held by CIP are detailed in Note 13,, "Consolidated Investment Products."


$ in millions	June 30, 2014	December 31, 2013	March 31, 2015	December 31, 2014
Available-for-sale investments:
Seed money	283.3	233.8	268.7	246.2
CLOs	4.1	4.0	2.5	3.4
Other debt securities	6.3	6.3	6.3	6.3
Trading investments:
Investments related to deferred compensation plans	246.9	249.7	179.2	162.6
Seed money			77.7	68.2
UIT-related equity and debt securities			17.0	3.4
Other equity securities	25.8	—	26.3	29.0
UIT-related equity and debt securities	5.5	3.3
Equity method investments	313.2	308.2	335.1	332.1
Foreign time deposits	28.4	28.8	30.5	29.6
Other	5.6	5.6	8.3	4.6
Total investments	919.1	839.7	951.6	885.4

~~Table of Contents~~

Available for sale investments

Realized gains and losses recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income during the period from investments classified as available-for-sale are as follows:


	For the three months ended June 30, 2014				For the six months ended June 30, 2014				For the three months ended March 31, 2015			For the three months ended March 31, 2014
$ in millions	Proceeds from Sales	Gross Realized Gains	Gross Realized Losses		Proceeds from Sales	Gross Realized Gains	Gross Realized Losses		Proceeds from Sales	Gross Realized Gains	Gross Realized Losses	Proceeds from Sales	Gross Realized Gains	Gross Realized Losses
Seed money	64.7	8.2	(0.1	)	74.9	11.0	(0.2	)	8.9	0.6	—	10.1	2.8	(0.1	)
CLOs	—	—	—		0.2	—	—		0.9	0.1	—	0.2	—	—

For the three months ended June 30, 2013 For the six months ended June 30, 2013
$ in millions Proceeds from Sales Gross Realized Gains Gross Realized Losses Proceeds from Sales Gross Realized Gains Gross Realized Losses
Seed money —
—
—
22.9
1.7
(0.3 )
CLOs —
—
—
0.1
—
—

Upon the sale of available-for-sale securities, net realized gains of ~~$8.1 million and $10.8~~$0.7 million were transferred from accumulated other comprehensive income into the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income during the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2014, respectively~~March 31, 2015 (three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2013: none and $1.4 million, respectively)~~March 31, 2014: $2.7 million). The specific identification method is used to determine the realized gain or loss on securities sold or otherwise disposed.

Table of Contents

Gross unrealized holding gains and losses recognized in other accumulated comprehensive income from available-for-sale investments are presented in the table below:


	June 30, 2014					December 31, 2013					March 31, 2015					December 31, 2014
$ in millions	Cost	Gross Unrealized Holding Gains	Gross Unrealized Holding Losses		Fair Value	Cost	Gross Unrealized Holding Gains	Gross Unrealized Holding Losses		Fair Value	Cost	Gross Unrealized Holding Gains	Gross Unrealized Holding Losses		Fair Value	Cost	Gross Unrealized Holding Gains	Gross Unrealized Holding Losses		Fair Value
Seed money	265.3	18.7	(0.7	)	283.3	215.7	19.0	(0.9	)	233.8	260.4	11.5	(3.2	)	268.7	237.7	12.8	(4.3	)	246.2
CLOs	3.6	0.5	—		4.1	3.8	0.2	—		4.0	2.6	—	(0.1	)	2.5	3.5	—	(0.1	)	3.4
Other debt securities	6.3	—	—		6.3	6.3	—	—		6.3	6.3	—	—		6.3	6.3	—	—		6.3
	275.2	19.2	(0.7	)	293.7	225.8	19.2	(0.9	)	244.1	269.3	11.5	(3.3	)	277.5	247.5	12.8	(4.4	)	255.9

At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, ~~112~~122 seed money funds (December 31, ~~2013: 149~~2014: 146 seed money funds) included gross unrealized holding losses. The following table provides a breakdown of the unrealized losses.


	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013			March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
$ in millions	Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value	Gross Unrealized Losses
Less than 12 months	13.9	(0.3	)	69.0	(0.8	)	85.5	(2.3	)	123.9	(3.5	)
12 months or greater	3.2	(0.4	)	0.2	(0.1	)	3.1	(0.9	)	3.6	(0.8	)
Total	17.1	(0.7	)	69.2	(0.9	)	88.6	(3.2	)	127.5	(4.3	)

The company has reviewed investment securities for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) in accordance with its accounting policy and has recognized no other-than-temporary impairment charges on available-for-sale investments during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: none). The company reviewed the financial condition and near-term prospects of the underlying securities in the seeded funds as well as the severity and duration of the impairment and concluded that the gross unrealized losses on these securities did not represent ~~other-than-temporarily~~other-than-temporary impairments. The securities are expected to recover their value over time and the company has the intent and ability to hold the securities until this recovery occurs. During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~2014, there were no charges to other comprehensive income from other-than-temporary impairment related to non-credit related factors.

At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, ~~$1.7~~$3.2 million available-for-sale debt securities mature in one year through five years, and ~~$8.7~~$5.6 million after five years through ten years.

~~Table of Contents~~

Trading investments

The portion of trading gains and losses for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, that relates to trading securities still held at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, was a ~~$7.9~~$0.2 million net gain ~~and $5.1 million net gain, respectively~~ (three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~$2.5~~$2.8 million net ~~loss and $14.0 million net gain, respectively)~~loss).

4. LONG-TERM DEBT

The disclosures below include details of the company's debt. Debt of CIP is detailed in Note 13, “Consolidated Investment Products.”


	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
$ in millions	Carrying Value	Fair Value	Carrying Value	Fair Value	Carrying Value	Fair Value	Carrying Value	Fair Value
Unsecured Senior Notes*:
$600 million 3.125% - due November 30, 2022	599.6	593.5	599.6	551.5	599.6	609.4	599.6	596.8
$600 million 4.000% - due January 30, 2024	596.0	629.2	595.8	593.2	596.3	639.8	596.2	625.9
$400 million 5.375% - due November 30, 2043	393.3	443.7	393.2	400.0	393.5	489.2	393.5	473.1
Floating rate credit facility expiring December 17, 2018					11.2	11.2	—	—
Long-term debt	1,588.9	1,666.4	1,588.6	1,544.7	1,600.6	1,749.6	1,589.3	1,695.8

____________


*	The company's senior note indentures contain certain restrictions on mergers or consolidations. Beyond these items, there are no other restrictive covenants in the indentures.

Table of Contents

The issuer of the senior notes is an indirect 100% owned finance subsidiary of Invesco Ltd. (the Parent), and the Parent fully and unconditionally guaranteed the securities. The requirement of certain subsidiaries of ours to maintain minimum levels of capital and other similar provisions of applicable law may have the effect of limiting withdrawals of capital, repayment of intercompany loans and payment of dividends by such entities.

The fair market value of the company's senior notes was determined by market quotes provided by Bloomberg, which is considered a Level 2 valuation input. In the absence of an active market, the company relies upon the average price quoted by brokers for determining the fair market value of the debt.

At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, the company's outstanding ~~debt~~senior notes of ~~$1,588.9~~$1,589.4 million ~~matures~~ mature in periods greater than five years from the balance sheet date. The floating rate credit facility will expire in less than five years.

At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, the outstanding balance on the $1.25 billion credit facility was ~~zero~~$11.2 million (December 31, ~~2013:~~2014: zero). The credit facility has a maturity of December 17, 2018. Borrowings under the credit facility will bear interest at (i) LIBOR for specified interest periods or (ii) a floating base rate (based upon the highest of (a) the Bank of America prime rate, (b) the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50% and (c) LIBOR for an interest period of one month plus 1.00%), plus, in either case, an applicable margin determined with reference to the higher of the available credit ratings of the company or its indirect subsidiary Invesco Finance PLC. Based on credit ratings as of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 of the company, the applicable margin for LIBOR-based loans was ~~1.10%~~1.00% and for base rate loans was ~~0.10%~~0.00%. In addition, the company is required to pay the lenders a facility fee on the aggregate commitments of the lenders (whether or not used) at a rate per annum which is based on the higher of the available credit ratings of the company or its indirect subsidiary Invesco Finance PLC. Based on credit ratings as of ~~June 30, 2014~~,March 31, 2015, the annual facility fee was equal to ~~0.15%~~0.125%.

The credit agreement governing the credit facility contains customary restrictive covenants on the company and its subsidiaries. Restrictive covenants in the credit agreement include, but are not limited to: prohibitions on creating, incurring or assuming any liens; entering into merger arrangements; selling, leasing, transferring or otherwise disposing of assets; making a material change in the nature of the business; making a significant accounting policy change in certain situations; entering into transactions with affiliates; and incurring indebtedness through the subsidiaries. Many of these restrictions are subject to certain minimum thresholds and exceptions. Financial covenants under the credit agreement include: (i) the quarterly maintenance of a debt/EBITDA leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, of not greater than ~~3.25~~:3.25:1.00, (ii) a coverage ratio (EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement/interest payable for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ended before the date of determination) of not less than ~~4.00~~:4.00:1.00.

The credit agreement governing the credit facility also contains customary provisions regarding events of default which could result in an acceleration or increase in amounts due, including (subject to certain materiality thresholds and grace periods) payment default, failure to comply with covenants, material inaccuracy of representation or warranty, bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings, change of control, certain judgments, ERISA matters, cross-default to other debt agreements,

~~Table of Contents~~

governmental action prohibiting or restricting the company or its subsidiaries in a manner that has a material adverse effect and failure of certain guaranty obligations. The company is in compliance with all regulatory minimum net capital requirements.

The lenders (and their respective affiliates) may have provided, and may in the future provide, investment banking, cash management, underwriting, lending, commercial banking, leasing, foreign exchange, trust or other advisory services to the company and its subsidiaries and affiliates. These parties may have received, and may in the future receive, customary compensation for these services.

The company maintains approximately ~~$36.1~~$40.0 million in letters of credit from a variety of banks. The letters of credit are generally one-year automatically-renewable facilities and are maintained for various commercial reasons.

5. SHARE CAPITAL

The number of common shares and common share equivalents issued are represented in the table below:


In millions	Six months ended June 30, 2014		Six months ended June 30, 2013		Three months ended March 31, 2015		Three months ended March 31, 2014
Common shares issued	490.4		490.4		490.4		490.4
Less: Treasury shares for which dividend and voting rights do not apply	(58.7	)	(47.6	)	(59.7	)	(57.7	)
Common shares outstanding	431.7		442.8		430.7		432.7

~~During the three and six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~, the company repurchased 1.3 million and 4.9 million shares, respectively (three and six months ended June 30, 2013: 2.2 million and 3.8 million, respectively) in the market at a cost of $50.0 million and $169.6 million, respectively (three and six months ended June 30, 2013: $75.5 million and $120.5 million cost, respectively). Separately, an aggregate of ~~1.9 million~~ ~~shares were withheld on vesting events during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~to meet employees' withholding tax obligations (June 30, 2013~~: ~~2.2 million). The fair value of these shares withheld at the respective withholding dates was~~ ~~$62.3 million~~ (~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$57.7 million). Approximately~~ ~~$1,326.8 million~~ ~~remained authorized under the company's share repurchase plan at~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ (~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$346.5 million~~).

Total treasury shares at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 were ~~67.9~~68.6 million (~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~57.7 million~~) (March 31, 2014: 67.1 million), including ~~9.2~~8.9 million unvested restricted stock awards (~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~10.1 million~~)(March 31, 2014: 9.4 million) for which dividend and voting rights apply. The market price of common

Table of Contents

shares at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 was ~~$37.75~~.$39.69. The total market value of the company's ~~67.9~~68.6 million treasury shares was ~~$2.6~~$2.7 billion at ~~June 30, 2014~~.March 31, 2015.

1819

Table of Contents

6. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS)

The components of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) were as follows:

For the three months ended June 30, 2014
$ in millions Foreign currency translation Employee benefit plans Equity method investments Available-for-sale investments Total
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before tax:
Currency translation differences on investments in foreign subsidiaries 130.5
—
—
—
130.5
Actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans —
(2.2 ) —
—
(2.2 )
Reclassification of amortization of prior service cost/(credit) into employee compensation expenses —
(0.4 ) —
—
(0.4 )
Reclassification of amortization of actuarial (gain)/loss into employee compensation expenses —
0.6
—
—
0.6
Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) of equity method investments —
—
3.2
—
3.2
Unrealized(losses)/gains on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
6.8
6.8
Reclassification of net (gains)/losses realized on available-for-sale investments included in other gains and losses, net —
—
—
(8.1 ) (8.1 )
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before tax 130.5
(2.0 ) 3.2
(1.3 ) 130.4
Income tax related to items of other comprehensive income/(loss):
Tax on actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans —
0.4
—
—
0.4
Reclassification of tax on amortization of prior service cost/(credit) into income tax provision —
0.1
—
—
0.1
Reclassification of tax on amortization of actuarial (loss)/gain into income tax provision —
(0.1 ) —
—
(0.1 )
Tax on net unrealized gains/(losses) on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
2.0
2.0
Reclassification of tax on net (gains)/losses on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
(2.7 ) (2.7 )
Total income tax benefit(expense) related to items of other comprehensive income —
0.4
—
(0.7 ) (0.3 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax:
Beginning balance 439.7
(78.1 ) 2.2
16.1
379.9
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax: 130.5
(1.6 ) 3.2
(2.0 ) 130.1
Other comprehensive (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests (0.1 ) —
—
—
(0.1 )
Ending balance 570.1
(79.7 ) 5.4
14.1
509.9



	For the three months ended March 31, 2015
$ in millions	Foreign currency translation		Employee benefit plans		Equity method investments	Available-for-sale investments		Total
Other comprehensive income/(loss) net of tax:
Currency translation differences on investments in foreign subsidiaries, net of tax	(302.9	)	—		—	—		(302.9	)
Reclassification of prior service cost/(credit) into employee compensation expense, net of tax	—		(1.8	)	—	—		(1.8	)
Reclassification of actuarial (gain)/loss into employee compensation expense, net of tax	—		0.5		—	—		0.5
Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) of equity method investments, net of tax	—		—		1.1	—		1.1
Unrealized (losses)/gains on available-for-sale investments, net of tax	—		—		—	1.2		1.2
Reclassification of net (gains)/losses realized on available-for-sale investments included in other gains and losses, net, net of tax	—		—		—	(0.5	)	(0.5	)
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	(302.9	)	(1.3	)	1.1	0.7		(302.4	)

Beginning balance	128.1		(91.7	)	6.5	5.9		48.8
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	(302.9	)	(1.3	)	1.1	0.7		(302.4	)
Ending balance	(174.8	)	(93.0	)	7.6	6.6		(253.6	)

~~Table of Contents~~

For the six months ended June 30, 2014
$ in millions Foreign currency translation Employee benefit plans Equity method investments Available-for-sale investments Total
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before tax:
Currency translation differences on investments in foreign subsidiaries 77.3
—
—
—
77.3
Actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans —
(2.6 ) —
—
(2.6 )
Reclassification of amortization of prior service cost/(credit) into employee compensation expenses —
(0.9 ) —
—
(0.9 )
Reclassification of amortization of actuarial (gain)/loss into employee compensation expenses —
1.2
—
—
1.2
Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) of equity method investments —
—
7.2
—
7.2
Unrealized(losses)/gains on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
11.0
11.0
Reclassification of net (gains)/losses realized on available-for-sale investments included in other gains and losses, net —
—
—
(10.8 ) (10.8 )
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before tax 77.3
(2.3 ) 7.2
0.2
82.4
Income tax related to items of other comprehensive income/(loss):
Tax on actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans —
0.5
—
—
0.5
Reclassification of tax on amortization of prior service cost/(credit) into income tax provision —
0.2
—
—
0.2
Reclassification of tax on amortization of actuarial (loss)/gain into income tax provision —
(0.2 ) —
—
(0.2 )
Tax on net unrealized gains/(losses) on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
2.2
2.2
Reclassification of tax on net (gains)/losses on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
(3.4 ) (3.4 )
Total income tax benefit(expense) related to items of other comprehensive income —
0.5
—
(1.2 ) (0.7 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax:
Beginning balance 492.5
(77.9 ) (1.8 ) 15.1
427.9
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax: 77.3
(1.8 ) 7.2
(1.0 ) 81.7
Other comprehensive (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests 0.3
—
—
—
0.3
Ending balance 570.1
(79.7 ) 5.4
14.1
509.9



	For the three months ended March 31, 2014
$ in millions	Foreign currency translation		Employee benefit plans		Equity method investments		Available-for-sale investments		Total
Other comprehensive income/(loss) net of tax:
Currency translation differences on investments in foreign subsidiaries, net of tax	(53.2	)	—		—		—		(53.2	)
Actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans, net of tax	—		(0.3	)	—		—		(0.3	)
Reclassification of prior service cost/(credit) into employee compensation expense, net of tax	—		(0.4	)	—		—		(0.4	)
Reclassification of actuarial (gain)/loss into employee compensation expense, net of tax	—		0.5		—		—		0.5
Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) of equity method investments, net of tax	—		—		4.0		—		4.0
Unrealized (losses)/gains on available-for-sale investments, net of tax	—		—		—		4.4		4.4
Reclassification of net (gains)/losses realized on available-for-sale investments included in other gains and losses, net, net of tax	—		—		—		(3.4	)	(3.4	)
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	(53.2	)	(0.2	)	4.0		1.0		(48.4	)

Beginning balance	492.5		(77.9	)	(1.8	)	15.1		427.9
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	(53.2	)	(0.2	)	4.0		1.0		(48.4	)
Other comprehensive (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests	0.4		—		—		—		0.4
Ending balance	439.7		(78.1	)	2.2		16.1		379.9

Table of Contents

For the three months ended June 30, 2013
$ in millions Foreign currency translation Employee benefit plans Equity method investments Available-for-sale investments Total
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before tax:
Currency translation differences on investments in foreign subsidiaries* (94.3 ) —
—
—
(94.3 )
Actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans —
0.3
—
—
0.3
Reclassification of amortization of prior service cost/(credit) into employee compensation expenses —
(0.5 ) —
—
(0.5 )
Reclassification of amortization of actuarial (gain)/loss into employee compensation expenses —
0.7
—
—
0.7
Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) of equity method investments —
—
(1.3 ) —
(1.3 )
Unrealized(losses)/gains on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
(0.3 ) (0.3 )
Reclassification of net (gains)/losses realized on available-for-sale investments included in other gains and losses, net —
—
—
—
—
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before tax (94.3 ) 0.5
(1.3 ) (0.3 ) (95.4 )
Income tax related to items of other comprehensive income/(loss):
Tax benefit/(expenses) on foreign currency translation differences (0.3 ) —
—
—
(0.3 )
Tax on actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans —
(0.1 ) —
—
(0.1 )
Reclassification of tax on amortization of prior service cost/(credit) into income tax provision —
0.1
—
—
0.1
Reclassification of tax on amortization of actuarial (loss)/gain into income tax provision —
(0.1 ) —
—
(0.1 )
Tax on net unrealized gains/(losses) on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
(0.8 ) (0.8 )
Reclassification of tax on net (gains)/losses on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
—
—
Total income tax benefit(expense) related to items of other comprehensive income (0.3 ) (0.1 ) —
(0.8 ) (1.2 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax:
Beginning balance 398.0
(74.2 ) 1.8
8.9
334.5
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax: (94.6 ) 0.4
(1.3 ) (1.1 ) (96.6 )
Other comprehensive (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests 6.0
—
—
—
6.0
Ending balance 309.4
(73.8 ) 0.5
7.8
243.9

~~__________________~~


*	~~Included in this amount are net losses of $6.0 million for the three months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ related to foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to CIP. Of this amount, gross losses of $0.3 million were reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP.

~~Table of Contents~~

For the six months ended June 30, 2013
$ in millions Foreign currency translation Employee benefit plans Equity method investments Available-for-sale investments Total
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before tax:
Currency translation differences on investments in foreign subsidiaries* (303.9 ) —
—
—
(303.9 )
Actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans —
6.8
—
—
6.8
Reclassification of amortization of prior service cost/(credit) into employee compensation expenses —
(1.0 ) —
—
(1.0 )
Reclassification of amortization of actuarial (gain)/loss into employee compensation expenses —
1.4
—
—
1.4
Share of other comprehensive income/(loss) of equity method investments —
—
(1.6 ) —
(1.6 )
Unrealized(losses)/gains on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
4.0
4.0
Reclassification of net (gains)/losses realized on available-for-sale investments included in other gains and losses, net —
—
—
(1.4 ) (1.4 )
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before tax (303.9 ) 7.2
(1.6 ) 2.6
(295.7 )
Income tax related to items of other comprehensive income/(loss):
Tax benefit/(expenses) on foreign currency translation differences (1.1 ) —
—
—
(1.1 )
Tax on actuarial (loss)/gain related to employee benefit plans —
(1.5 ) —
—
(1.5 )
Reclassification of tax on amortization of prior service cost/(credit) into income tax provision —
0.2
—
—
0.2
Reclassification of tax on amortization of actuarial (loss)/gain into income tax provision —
(0.3 ) —
—
(0.3 )
Tax on net unrealized gains/(losses) on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
(0.6 ) (0.6 )
Reclassification of tax on net (gains)/losses on available-for-sale investments —
—
—
(0.3 ) (0.3 )
Total income tax benefit(expense) related to items of other comprehensive income (1.1 ) (1.6 ) —
(0.9 ) (3.6 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax:
Beginning balance 601.7
(79.4 ) 2.1
6.1
530.5
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax: (305.0 ) 5.6
(1.6 ) 1.7
(299.3 )
Other comprehensive (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests 12.7
—
—
—
12.7
Ending balance 309.4
(73.8 ) 0.5
7.8
243.9

~~__________________~~


*	~~Included in this amount are net losses of $12.7 million for the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ related to foreign currency translation adjustments attributable to CIP. None of this amount was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP for the six months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.

~~Table of Contents~~

7. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The company recognized total expenses of ~~$70.0~~$40.7 million and ~~$69.4~~$36.5 million related to equity-settled share-based payment transactions in the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, ~~and June 30, 2013,~~ respectively.

Cash received from exercise of share options granted under share-based compensation arrangements was ~~$5.2~~$0.7 million in the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014 (six~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013:~~ ~~$10.8 million~~)March 31, 2014: $1.5 million).

Share Awards

Share awards are broadly classified into two categories: time-vested and performance-vested. Share awards are measured at fair value at the date of grant and are expensed, based on the company's estimate of shares that will eventually vest, on a straight-line or accelerated basis over the vesting period.

Time-vested awards vest ratably over or cliff-vest at the end of a period of continued employee service. Performance-vested awards cliff-vest at the end of or vest ratably over a defined vesting period of continued employee service upon the company's attainment of certain performance criteria. Time-vested and performance-vested share awards are granted in the form of restricted share awards (RSAs) or restricted share units (RSUs). Performance-vested awards are tied to the achievement of specified levels of adjusted diluted earnings per share and adjusted operating margin. In the event that either targeted financial measure is achieved at or above a vesting threshold for a particular performance measurement period, the portion of the performance-vested award subject to targeted financial measures will vest proportionately between 0% and 100% based upon the higher achieved level for that year.

With respect to time-vested awards, dividends accrue directly to the employee holder of RSAs, and cash payments in lieu of dividends are made to employee holders of certain RSUs. With respect to performance-vested awards, dividends and cash payments in lieu of dividends are deferred and are paid at the same rate as on our shares if and to the extent the award vests.

In May 2011, the company's shareholders approved the 2011 Global Equity Incentive Plan, which authorized the issuance of up to 28 million shares under this plan. In May 2010, the board approved the 2010 Global Equity Incentive Plan (ST), which authorized the issuance of up to 3 million shares under this plan. Under the terms of the ~~2010 Global Equity Incentive Plan (ST),~~plan, shares are issued only as employment inducement awards in connection with a strategic transaction and, as a result, do not require shareholder approval under the rules of the New York Stock Exchange or otherwise.

Movements on share awards priced in U.S. dollars during the periods ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, are detailed below:

For the six months ended June 30, 2014 For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Millions of shares, except fair values Time- Vested Performance- Vested Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($) Time- Vested Performance- Vested
Unvested at the beginning of period 13.9
0.4
25.00
16.5
0.3
Granted during the period 4.2
0.2
34.31
5.1
0.2
Forfeited during the period (0.9 ) —
23.42
(0.2 ) —
Vested and distributed during the period (5.2 ) (0.1 ) 24.14
(6.5 ) (0.1 )
Unvested at the end of the period 12.0
0.5
28.79
14.9
0.4

~~Table of Contents~~



	For the three months ended March 31, 2015					For the three months ended March 31, 2014
Millions of shares, except fair values	Time- Vested		Performance- Vested		Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value ($)	Time- Vested		Performance- Vested
Unvested at the beginning of period	11.5		0.5		29.00	13.9		0.4
Granted during the period	3.9		0.3		40.26	4.1		0.2
Forfeited during the period	—		—		—	—		—
Vested and distributed during the period	(4.3	)	(0.2	)	28.11	(4.9	)	(0.1	)
Unvested at the end of the period	11.1		0.6		33.39	13.1		0.5

In December 2007, in connection with the redomicile of the company from the U.K. to Bermuda, the company’s primary share listing moved from the London Stock Exchange to the New York Stock Exchange. Movements on share awards priced in Pounds Sterling, which were awarded prior to the move of the company’s primary share listing to the New York Stock Exchange, during the six months ended June 30, are detailed below:

For the six months ended June 30, 2014 For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Millions of shares, except fair values Time-Vested Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (£ Sterling) Time-Vested
Unvested at the beginning of period 0.1
12.90
0.3
Forfeited during the period —
—
—
Vested and distributed during the period (0.1 ) 12.90
(0.2 )
Unvested at the end of the period —
—
0.1

~~All share~~Share awards outstanding at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, had a weighted average remaining contractual life of ~~1.68~~1.89 years. The total fair value of shares that vested during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 was ~~$181.9~~$172.1 million ~~(six~~ (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013:~~ ~~$181.7 million~~)March 31, 2014: $171.0 million). The weighted average grant date fair value of the U.S. dollar share awards that were granted during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 was ~~$34.31~~ ~~(six~~$40.26 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013:~~March 31, 2014: $~~26.85~~34.30).

At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, there was ~~$307.4~~$364.6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested share awards; that cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.04 years .~~2.88~~ ~~years.~~

~~Share Options~~

The company has not granted share option awards since 2005. All share options awards, therefore, were granted prior to the December 2007 redomicile from the United Kingdom to Bermuda and re-listing from the London Stock Exchange (where the predecessor company's ordinary shares traded in Pounds Sterling) to the New York Stock Exchange (where the company's common shares now trade in U.S. Dollars). At the time of their grants, the exercise prices of the share options were denominated in the company's trading currency, which was the Pound Sterling. The company did not change the accounting for share options at the redomicile/re-listing date, because the share options were not modified at that date. The exercise price remains in Pounds Sterling and was not changed to U.S. Dollars. Therefore, upon exercise of the share options, the Pound Sterling exercise price will be converted into U.S. Dollars using the spot foreign exchange rate in effect on the exercise date. Upon the exercise of share options, the company either issues new shares or can utilize shares held in treasury (see Note 5~~, “Share Capital”) to satisfy the exercise.~~

~~Changes in outstanding share option awards are as follows:~~

For the six months ended June 30, 2014 For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Millions of shares, except prices Options
Weighted Average Exercise Price
(£ Sterling)
Options
Weighted Average Exercise Price
(£ Sterling)
Outstanding at the beginning of period 1.1
7.32
2.6
7.31
Exercised during the period (0.4 ) 6.74
(0.9 ) 7.27
Outstanding at the end of the period 0.7
7.64
1.7
7.33
Exercisable at the end of the period 0.7
7.64
1.7
7.33

~~Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)~~

During 2012, the company established a nonqualified, broad-based ESPP for all eligible employees. Employees may purchase shares of our common stock generally in annual intervals at 85% of fair market value. Employee ESPP contributions may not exceed $6,000 per offering period. Upon the plan vesting date, the company either issues new shares or can utilize shares held in treasury (see Note 5~~, "Share Capital") to satisfy the exercise. For the six months ended June 30, 2014, the company recognized~~ ~~$0.4 million~~ ~~in compensation expense related to the ESPP (June 30, 2013: $0.5 million).~~

2421

Table of Contents

8. RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Contribution Plans

The company operates defined contribution retirement benefit plans for all qualifying employees. The assets of the plans are held separately from those of the company in funds under the control of trustees. When employees leave the plans prior to vesting fully in the contributions, the contributions payable by the company are reduced by the amount of forfeited contributions.

The total amounts charged to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 of ~~$14.3~~$15.4 million ~~and~~ ~~$29.7 million, respectively~~ (three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~13.5 million and~~ ~~$28.1 million, respectively)~~$15.4 million) represent contributions paid or payable to these plans by the company at rates specified in the rules of the plans. As of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, accrued contributions of ~~$12.3~~$8.8 million (December 31, ~~2013:~~ ~~$21.8 million~~)2014: $25.4 million) for the current year will be paid to the plans.

Defined Benefit Plans

The company maintains legacy defined benefit pension plans for qualifying employees of its subsidiaries in the U.K., Ireland, Germany and Taiwan. All defined benefit plans are closed to new participants. The company also maintains a postretirement medical plan in the U.S., which was closed to new participants in 2005. In 2006, the plan was amended to eliminate benefits for all participants who did not meet retirement eligibility by 2008. In November 2014, Invesco further amended the plan, which will result in its termination effective December 31, 2016. The assets of all defined benefit schemes are held in separate trustee-administered funds. Under the plans, the employees are generally entitled to retirement benefits based on final salary at retirement.

The components of net periodic benefit cost in respect of these defined benefit plans are as follows:


	Retirement Plans								Medical Plan								Retirement Plans				Medical Plan
	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,				For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,				For the three months ended March 31,				For the three months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2014		2013		2015		2014		2015		2014
Service cost	(1.1	)	(1.1	)	(2.2	)	(2.2	)	—		(0.1	)	(0.1	)	(0.2	)	1.2		1.1		—		0.1
Interest cost	(4.7	)	(4.9	)	(9.5	)	(9.8	)	(0.5	)	(0.5	)	(1.0	)	(1.0	)	5.3		4.8		—		0.5
Expected return on plan assets	4.7		4.4		9.3		8.8		0.1		0.1		0.3		0.2		(6.2	)	(4.6	)	(0.1	)	(0.2	)
Amortization of prior service cost/(credit)	(0.1	)	—		(0.1	)	—		0.5		0.5		1.0		1.0		—		—		(2.2	)	(0.5	)
Amortization of net actuarial gain/(loss)	(0.5	)	(0.6	)	(1.0	)	(1.2	)	(0.1	)	(0.1	)	(0.2	)	(0.2	)
Net periodic benefit cost	(1.7	)	(2.2	)	(3.5	)	(4.4	)	—		(0.1	)	—		(0.2	)
Amortization of net actuarial (gain)/loss																	0.6		0.5		—		0.1
Net periodic benefit cost/(benefit)																	0.9		1.8		(2.3	)	—

The estimated amounts of contributions expected to be paid to the plans during ~~2014~~2015 are ~~$15.9~~$15.2 million for retirement plans and ~~$2.2 million~~none for the medical plan. Payments made to the plans during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 were ~~$8.0~~$3.8 million to the retirement plan and ~~$1.1 million~~zero to the medical plan.

9. TAXATION

At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, the total amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits was ~~$8.8~~$5.5 million as compared to the December 31, ~~2013~~2014 total of ~~$16.8 million. During the three months ended June 30, 2014, gross unrecognized tax benefits of~~ ~~$7.9 million~~ ~~were recognized as a result of a favorable tax settlement. Including interest and penalties, income tax expense decreased by~~ ~~$4.8 million~~, net of federal tax effects. The company and its subsidiaries file annual income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. state and local jurisdictions, and in numerous foreign jurisdictions. A number of years may elapse before an uncertain tax position, for which the company has unrecognized tax benefits, is finally resolved. To the extent that the company has favorable tax settlements, or determines that accrued amounts are no longer needed due to a lapse in the applicable statute of limitations or other reasons, such liabilities, as well as the related interest and penalty, would be reversed as a reduction of income tax expense (net of federal tax effects, if applicable) in the period such determination is made.$6.0 million.

2522

Table of Contents

10. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic and diluted earnings per share are computed using the two-class method. There is no difference between the calculated earnings per share amounts attributable to Invesco Ltd. and the calculated earnings per share amounts under the two-class method.

The calculation of earnings per share is as follows:


	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,						For the three months ended March 31,
In millions, except per share data	2014			2013			2014			2013			2015			2014
Income from continuing operations, net of taxes		$316.6			$208.3			$525.4			$403.8			$284.0			$208.8
Net (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	(42.3		)	(1.1		)	(61.3		)	21.5			(24.4		)	(19.0		)
Income from continuing operations attributable to Invesco Ltd. for basic and diluted EPS calculations	274.3			207.2			464.1			425.3			259.6			189.8
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	0.2			(4.6		)	(1.8		)	(0.5		)	—			(2.0		)
Net income attributable to Invesco Ltd.													259.6			187.8
Less: Allocation of earnings to restricted shares													(6.7		)	(5.7		)
Net income attributable to common shareholders		$274.5			$202.6			$462.3			$424.8			$252.9			$182.1

Invesco Ltd:
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic	435.7			449.1			436.2			448.5			432.2			436.8
Dilutive effect of share-based awards	0.7			1.0			0.7			1.1
Dilutive effect of non-participating share-based awards													0.3			0.6
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted	436.4			450.1			436.9			449.6			432.5			437.4

Common shareholders:
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic													432.2			436.8
Less: Weighted average restricted shares													(11.3		)	(13.3		)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic													420.9			423.5
Dilutive effect of non-participating share-based awards													0.3			0.6
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted													421.2			424.1

Basic earnings per share:
Earnings per share from continuing operations		$0.63			$0.46			$1.06			$0.95			$0.60			$0.43
Earnings per share from discontinued operations		$—			($0.01	)		$—			$—			$—			$—
Basic earnings per share		$0.63			$0.45			$1.06			$0.95			$0.60			$0.43

Diluted earnings per share:
Earnings per share from continuing operations		$0.63			$0.46			$1.06			$0.95			$0.60			$0.43
Earnings per share from discontinued operations		$—			($0.01	)		$—			$—			$—			$—
Diluted earnings per share		$0.63			$0.45			$1.06			$0.94			$0.60			$0.43

See Note 7,, “Share-Based Compensation,” for a summary of share awards outstanding under the company's share-based ~~payment~~compensation programs. These programs could result in the issuance of common shares from time-to-time that would affect the measurement of basic and diluted earnings per share.

There were no antidilutive options excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share in the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: none). Antidilutive options are those where the options' exercise prices are greater than the average market price of the shares.

There were no time-vested ~~share~~based awards that were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30~~, ~~2014~~March 31, 2015 and ~~2013~~,2014, due to their inclusion being anti-dilutive. There were ~~0.3~~0.6 million contingently issuable shares excluded from the diluted earnings per share computation during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~0.4~~0.5 million), because the necessary performance conditions for the shares to be issuable had not yet been satisfied at the end of the respective period.

Table of Contents

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments and contingencies may arise in the ordinary course of business.

Off Balance Sheet Commitments

The company has transactions with various private equity, real estate and other investment entities sponsored by the company for the investment of client assets in the normal course of business. Many of the company's investment products are structured as limited partnerships. The company's investment may take the form of the general partner or a limited partner. The entities are structured such that each partner makes capital commitments that are to be drawn down over the life of the partnership as investment opportunities are identified. At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, the company's undrawn capital commitments were ~~$101.8~~$152.2 million (December 31, ~~2013:~~ ~~$152.5 million~~)2014: $158.8 million).

The Parent and various company subsidiaries have entered into agreements with financial institutions to guarantee certain obligations of other company subsidiaries. The company would be required to perform under these guarantees in the event of

~~Table of Contents~~

certain defaults. The company has not had prior claims or losses pursuant to these contracts and expects the risk of loss to be remote.

Legal Contingencies

~~In July 2010, various closed-end funds formerly advised by Van Kampen Investments or Morgan Stanley Investment Management had complaints filed against them~~The company is from time to time involved in New York State Court commencing derivative lawsuits purportedly brought on behalf of the common shareholders of those funds. The funds are nominal defendants in these derivative lawsuits and the defendants also include Van Kampen Investments (acquired by Invesco on June 1, 2010), Morgan Stanley Investment Management and certain officers and trustees of the funds who are or were employees of those firms. Invesco has certain obligations under the applicable acquisition agreement regarding the defense costs and any damages associated with this litigation. The plaintiffs allege breaches of fiduciary duties owed by the non-fund defendantslitigation relating to the funds’ common shareholders related to the funds’ redemption in prior periods of Auction Rate Preferred Securities (ARPS) theretofore issued by the funds. The complaints are similar to other complaints filed against investment advisers, officers and trustees of closed-end funds in other fund complexes which issued and redeemed ARPS. The complaints allege that the advisers, distributors and certain officers and trustees of those funds breached their fiduciary duty by redeeming ARPS at their liquidation value when there was no obligation to do so and when the value of ARPSclaims arising in the secondary marketplace were significantly below their liquidation value. The complaints also allege that the ARPS redemptions were principally motivated by the fund sponsors’ interests to preserve distribution relationships with brokers and other financial intermediaries who held ARPS after having repurchased them from their own clients. The complaints do not specify alleged damages. Certain other funds included in the acquired business have received demand letters expressing similar allegations. Such demand letters could be precursors to additional similar lawsuits being commenced against those other funds. The Boardsordinary course of Trustees of the funds established special committees of independent trustees to conduct an inquiry regarding the allegations set forth in the complaints and demand letters. The Boards of Trustees of the funds accepted the recommendation of their special litigation committees to (i) reject the demands contained in the demand letters and (ii) to seek dismissal of the related lawsuits. Motions to dismiss were filed on October 4, 2011 and remain pending.

Invesco believes the cases and other claims identified above should be dismissed or otherwise will terminate, although there can be no assurance of that result. Invesco intends to defend vigorously any cases which may survive beyond initial motions to dismiss. The company cannot predict with certainty, however, the eventual outcome of such cases and other claims, nor whether they will have a material negative impact on the company.its business. The nature and progression of litigation can make it difficult to predict the impact a particular lawsuit will have on the company. There are many reasons that the company cannot make these assessments, including, among others, one or more of the following: the proceeding is in its early stages; the damages sought are unspecified, unsupportable, unexplained or uncertain; the claimant is seeking relief other than compensatory damages; the matter presents novel legal claims or other meaningful legal uncertainties; discovery has not started or is not complete; there are significant facts in dispute; and there are other parties who may share in any ultimate liability.

~~The company is from time to time involved in litigation relating to other claims arising in the ordinary course of its business.~~ In management’s opinion, adequate accrual has been made as of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 to provide for any such losses that may arise from matters for which the company could reasonably estimate an amount. Management is of the opinion that the ultimate resolution of such claims will not materially affect the company’s business, financial position, results of operation or liquidity. Furthermore, in management’s opinion, it is not possible to estimate a range of reasonably possible losses with respect to other litigation contingencies.

The investment management industry also is subject to extensive levels of ongoing regulatory oversight and examination. In the United States, United Kingdom, and other jurisdictions in which the company operates, governmental authorities regularly make inquiries, hold investigations and administer market conduct examinations with respect to the company's compliance with applicable laws and regulations. Additional lawsuits or regulatory enforcement actions arising out of these inquiries may in the future be filed against the company and related entities and individuals in the United States, United Kingdom, and other jurisdictions in which the company and its affiliates operate. Any material loss of investor and/or client confidence as a result of such inquiries and/or litigation could result in a significant decline in assets under management, which would have an adverse effect on the company’s future financial results and its ability to grow its business.

In a separate matter, a Canadian subsidiary of the company has received assessments related to various prior taxation periods for goods and services tax on revenue to which management fee rebates had been applied in those periods. The assessments, related interest, and penalty amounts are approximately $21.9 million. The trial between Invesco Canada Ltd. and the Canada Revenue Agency, argued in the Tax Court of Canada, concluded in May 2014, and the company is waiting for the Tax Court decision. Management believes Canada Revenue Agency's claims are unfounded and that these assessments are unlikely to stand, and accordingly no provision has been recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~Table of Contents~~

12. CONSOLIDATED SPONSORED INVESTMENT PRODUCTS

The following table presents the balances related to CSIP that are included on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as well as Invesco's net interests in CSIP for each period presented.


$ in millions	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Investments of CSIP	306.4		93.2		286.1		288.5
Cash and cash equivalents of CSIP	13.7		12.7		20.2		11.4
Accounts receivable and other assets of CSIP	6.7		2.6		7.9		5.9
Assets of CSIP	326.8		108.5		314.2		305.8
Other liabilities of CSIP	(7.7	)	(4.7	)	(8.0	)	(7.9	)
Equity attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interests	(155.0	)	—		(167.6	)	(165.5	)
Equity attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests	(17.7	)	(12.0	)	(13.2	)	(10.6	)
Invesco's net interests in CSIP	146.4		91.8		125.4		121.8
Invesco's net economic interests as a percentage of investments of CSIP	47.8	%	98.5	%	43.8	%	42.2	%

Table of Contents

The carrying value of investments held by CSIP is also their fair value. The following tables present the fair value hierarchy levels of investments held by CSIP, which are measured at fair value as of ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, and December 31, ~~2013:~~2014:


	As of June 30, 2014				As of March 31, 2015
$ in millions	Fair Value Measurements	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)	Fair Value Measurements	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Investments:
Fixed income securities	186.0	72.2	113.8	—	198.0	—	198.0	—
Equity securities	29.6	29.6	—	—	1.2	1.2	—	—
Investments in fixed income funds*	66.7	66.7	—	—	48.9	48.9	—	—
Investments in other private equity funds*	24.1	—	—	24.1	38.0	—	—	38.0
Total investments at fair value	306.4	168.5	113.8	24.1	286.1	50.1	198.0	38.0


	As of December 31, 2013				As of December 31, 2014
$ in millions	Fair Value Measurements	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)	Fair Value Measurements	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Investments:
Fixed income securities	43.2	—	43.2	—	200.3	—	200.3	—
Equity securities	27.8	27.8	—	—
Investments in fixed income funds*	6.0	6.0	—	—	58.0	58.0	—	—
Investments in other private equity funds*	16.2	—	—	16.2	30.2	—	—	30.2
Total investments at fair value	93.2	33.8	43.2	16.2	288.5	58.0	200.3	30.2

________________


*	Investments in fixed income funds and other private equity funds are valued using the net asset value (NAV) as a practical expedient. The NAVs that have been provided are derived from the fair values of the underlying investments as of the consolidation date. Refer to Note 13, "Consolidated Investment Products," for additional discussion regarding the fair value of private equity funds.

~~Table of Contents~~

The tables below summarizes as of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, the nature of investments that are valued using the NAV as a practical expedient and any related liquidation restrictions or other factors which may impact the ultimate value realized:

As of June 30, 2014

As of March 31, 2015

Fair Value

($ in millions)

Total Unfunded Commitments ($ in millions)

Weighted Average Remaining Term ⁽¹⁾

Redemption Frequency

Redemption Notice Period

Fair Value

($ in millions)

Total Unfunded Commitments ($ in millions)

Weighted Average Remaining Term ⁽¹⁾

Redemption Frequency

Redemption Notice Period

Fixed income funds

$66.7

$—

n/a

Monthly

10 days

48.9

—

n/a

Monthly

10 days

Private equity fund of funds

$24.1

$30.8

7.6 years

n/a ⁽²⁾

n/a⁽²⁾

38.0

32.9

7.7 years

n/a ⁽²⁾

n/a⁽²⁾

As of December 31, 2014

As of December 31, 2013

Fair Value

($ in millions)

Total Unfunded Commitments ($ in millions)

Weighted Average Remaining Term ⁽¹⁾

Redemption Frequency

Redemption Notice Period

Fair Value

($ in millions)

Total Unfunded Commitments ($ in millions)

Weighted Average Remaining Term ⁽¹⁾

Redemption Frequency

Redemption Notice Period

Fixed income funds

$6.0

$—

n/a

Monthly

10 days

58.0

—

n/a

Monthly

10 days

Private equity fund of funds

$16.2

$35.6

8.5 years

n/a ⁽²⁾

30.2

35.0

7.6 years

n/a ⁽²⁾

__________________

(1) These investments are expected to be returned through distributions as a result of liquidations of the funds' underlying assets over the weighted average periods indicated.

(2) These investments are not subject to redemption; however, for certain funds, the investors may sell or transfer their interest, which may require approval by the general partner of the underlying funds.

Table of Contents

Equity securities are valued under the market approach through use of quoted prices on an exchange. To the extent these securities are actively traded, valuation adjustments are not applied and they are categorized within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy; otherwise, they are categorized in level 2.

Fixed income securities are fair valued using an evaluated quote provided by an independent pricing service. Evaluated quotes provided by the pricing service may be determined without exclusive reliance on quoted prices, and may reflect appropriate factors such as institution-size trading in similar groups of securities, developments related to specific securities, yield, quality, type of issue, coupon rate, maturity, individual trading characteristics and other market data. Depending on the nature of the inputs, these investments are categorized as level 1, 2, or 3.

The following ~~table shows~~tables show a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value measurements for level 3 assets using significant unobservable ~~inputs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 (three and six months ended June 30, 2013: none):~~inputs:


				Three months ended March 31,
$ in millions	Three months ended June 30, 2014	Six months ended June 30, 2014		2015		2014
Beginning balance	19.5	16.2		30.2		16.2
Purchases	1.8	4.0		3.4		2.2
Sales	—	(0.4	)	(1.4	)	(0.4	)
Gains and losses included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income*	2.8	4.3		5.8		1.5
Ending balance	24.1	24.1		38.0		19.5

__________________


*	Included in other income/~~(loss)~~(expense) of CSIP, net, in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 are ~~$2.8~~$5.8 million ~~and $4.3 million~~ in net unrealized gains attributable to investments still held at ~~June 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended March 31, 2014: $1.5 million).

2926

Table of Contents

13. CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENT PRODUCTS

The following table presents the balances related to CIP that are included on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as well as Invesco's net interest in the CIP for each period presented.

As of
$ in millions June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
Cash and cash equivalents of CIP 292.4
583.6
Investments of CIP 4,971.4
4,734.7
Accounts receivable and other assets of CIP 121.7
58.3
Less: Debt of CIP (4,301.5 ) (4,181.7 )
Less: Other liabilities of CIP (201.0 ) (461.8 )
Less: Retained earnings ⁽¹⁾
(15.8 ) (12.5 )
Less: Retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP (63.3 ) (104.3 )
Less: Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax ⁽¹⁾
15.7
12.7
Less: Equity attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests (753.2 ) (570.3 )
Invesco's net interests in CIP 66.4
58.7
Invesco's net economic interests as a percentage of investments of CIP 1.3 % 1.2 %

~~____________~~


~~(1)~~	These amounts reflect the reclassification of the company's gain or loss (representing the changes in the market value of the company's holding in the consolidated CLOs) from other comprehensive income into other gains/losses upon consolidation.



	As of
$ in millions	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Cash and cash equivalents of CIP	393.9		404.0
Accounts receivable and other assets of CIP	82.1		161.3
Investments of CIP	6,198.0		5,762.8
Less: Debt of CIP	(5,479.7	)	(5,149.6	)
Less: Other liabilities of CIP	(320.7	)	(280.9	)
Less: Retained earnings	(12.1	)	(20.3	)
Less: Retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP	—		(17.6	)
Less: Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	12.1		20.2
Less: Equity attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests	(780.8	)	(781.2	)
Invesco's net interests in CIP	92.8		98.7
Invesco's net economic interests as a percentage of investments of CIP	1.5	%	1.7	%

The company's risk with respect to each investment in CIP is limited to its equity ownership and any uncollected management and performance fees. Therefore, the gains or losses of CIP have not had a significant impact on the company's net income attributable to ~~common shareholders,~~Invesco Ltd., liquidity or capital resources. The company has no right to the benefits from, nor does it bear the risks associated with, these investments, beyond the company's minimal direct investments in, and management and performance fees generated from, the investment products. If the company were to liquidate, these investments would not be available to the general creditors of the company, and as a result, the company does not consider investments held by CIP to be company assets. Additionally, the collateral assets of consolidated collateralized loan obligations (CLOs) are held solely to satisfy the obligations of the CLOs, and the investors in the consolidated CLOs have no recourse to the general credit of the company for the notes issued by the CLOs.

At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, the company's maximum risk of loss in significant VIEs in which the company is not the primary beneficiary is presented in the table below.


$ in millions	Footnote Reference	Carrying Value	Company's Maximum Risk of Loss	Footnote Reference	Carrying Value	Company's Maximum Risk of Loss
CLO investments	3	4.1	4.1	3	2.5	2.5
Partnership and trust investments		17.0	17.0		16.4	16.4
Investments in Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc.		30.6	30.6		30.6	30.6
Total			51.7			49.5

During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, the company invested in and consolidated ~~three~~one new ~~VIEs~~VIE and one new VOE. The table below illustrates the summary balance sheet amounts related to these products before consolidation into the company. The balances below are reflective of the balances existing at the consolidation date after the initial funding of the investments by the company and unrelated third-party investors. The current period activity for the consolidated funds, including the initial funding and subsequent investment of initial cash balances into underlying investments of CIP, is reflected in the company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3027

Table of Contents

Balance Sheet information - newly consolidated VIEs/VOEs


	For the six months ended June 30, 2014			For the three months ended March 31, 2015
$ in millions	VIEs		VOEs	VIEs	VOEs
Cash and cash equivalents of CIP	576.5		—	209.2	10.0
Accounts receivable and other assets of CIP	0.5		9.0	1.5	—
Investments of CIP	538.0		40.1	567.0	—
Total assets	1,115.0		49.1	777.7	10.0

Debt of CIP	691.2		—	601.4	—
Other liabilities of CIP	432.6		11.8	176.3	—
Total liabilities	1,123.8		11.8	777.7	—
Total equity	(8.8	)	37.3	—	10.0
Total liabilities and equity	1,115.0		49.1	777.7	10.0

During the three months ended June 30, 2014, the company determined that it was no longer the primary beneficiary of a CLO due to a change in the rights held by others. The amounts deconsolidated from the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet are illustrated in the table below. There was no net impact to the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income from the deconsolidation of this CLO.

~~Balance Sheet~~



~~$ in millions~~	~~Deconsolidated-CLOs-VIEs~~
~~Cash and cash equivalents of CIP~~	~~30.5~~
~~Accounts receivable and other assets of CIP~~	~~17.6~~
~~Investments of CIP~~	~~346.5~~
~~Total assets~~	~~394.6~~
~~Debt of CIP~~	~~347.9~~
~~Other liabilities of CIP~~	~~45.7~~
~~Total liabilities~~	~~393.6~~
~~Equity~~	~~1.0~~
~~Total liabilities and equity~~	~~394.6~~

~~Table of Contents~~

The following tables reflect the impact of consolidation of investment products into the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014.

Summary of Balance Sheet Impact of CIP


	As of June 30, 2014								As of March 31, 2015
$ in millions	CLOs - VIEs		Other VIEs	VOEs	Adjustments⁽¹⁾		Impact of CIP		CLOs - VIEs		Other VIEs	VOEs	Adjustments⁽¹⁾		Impact of CIP
Accounts receivable	—		—	—	(2.8	)	(2.8	)	—		—	—	(4.1	)	(4.1	)
Investments	—		—	—	(63.6	)	(63.6	)	—		—	—	(88.7	)	(88.7	)
Cash and cash equivalents of CIP	247.1		5.4	39.9	—		292.4		357.2		2.7	34.0	—		393.9
Accounts receivable of CIP	98.9		0.1	22.7	—		121.7		70.5		0.2	11.4	—		82.1
Investments of CIP	4,325.2		42.4	671.2	(67.4	)	4,971.4		5,500.5		69.3	704.6	(76.4	)	6,198.0
Total assets	4,671.2		47.9	733.8	(133.8	)	5,319.1		5,928.2		72.2	750.0	(169.2	)	6,581.2
Debt of CIP	4,407.5		—	—	(106.0	)	4,301.5		5,607.2		—	—	(127.5	)	5,479.7
Other liabilities of CIP	200.3		1.0	2.5	(2.8	)	201.0		321.0		0.6	3.2	(4.1	)	320.7
Total liabilities	4,607.8		1.0	2.5	(108.8	)	4,502.5		5,928.2		0.6	3.2	(131.6	)	5,800.4
Retained earnings	15.8		—	—	—		15.8		12.1		—	—	—		12.1
Retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP	63.3		—	—	—		63.3
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	(15.7	)	—	—	—		(15.7	)	(12.1	)	—	—	—		(12.1	)
Equity attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	—		46.9	731.3	(25.0	)	753.2		—		71.6	746.8	(37.6	)	780.8
Total liabilities and equity	4,671.2		47.9	733.8	(133.8	)	5,319.1		5,928.2		72.2	750.0	(169.2	)	6,581.2

____________


(1)	Adjustments include the elimination of intercompany transactions between the company and its CIP, primarily the elimination of the company's equity at risk recorded as investments by the company (before consolidation) against either equity (private equity funds) or subordinated debt (CLOs) of the funds.

As of December 31, 2013
$ in millions CLOs - VIEs Other VIEs VOEs
Adjustments⁽¹⁾
Impact of CIP
Accounts receivable —
—
—
(3.4 ) (3.4 )
Investments —
—
—
(55.3 ) (55.3 )
Cash and cash equivalents of CIP 542.3
5.6
35.7
—
583.6
Accounts receivable of CIP 56.3
0.2
1.8
—
58.3
Investments of CIP 4,237.3
40.4
512.2
(55.2 ) 4,734.7
Total assets 4,835.9
46.2
549.7
(113.9 ) 5,317.9
Debt of CIP 4,270.4
—
—
(88.7 ) 4,181.7
Other liabilities of CIP 461.4
0.9
3.0
(3.5 ) 461.8
Total liabilities 4,731.8
0.9
3.0
(92.2 ) 4,643.5
Retained earnings 12.5
—
—
—
12.5
Retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP 104.3
—
—
—
104.3
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax (12.7 ) —
—
—
(12.7 )
Equity attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities —
45.3
546.7
(21.7 ) 570.3
Total liabilities and equity 4,835.9
46.2
549.7
(113.9 ) 5,317.9
28

Table of Contents



	As of December 31, 2014
$ in millions	CLOs - VIEs		Other VIEs	VOEs	Adjustments⁽¹⁾		Impact of CIP
Accounts receivable	—		—	—	(3.8	)	(3.8	)
Investments	—		—	—	(94.9	)	(94.9	)
Cash and cash equivalents of CIP	378.8		5.0	21.5	(1.3	)	404.0
Accounts receivable of CIP	155.7		0.1	5.5	—		161.3
Investments of CIP	5,063.5		53.4	730.2	(84.3	)	5,762.8
Total assets	5,598.0		58.5	757.2	(184.3	)	6,229.4
Debt of CIP	5,302.9		—	—	(153.3	)	5,149.6
Other liabilities of CIP	277.4		0.4	6.9	(3.8	)	280.9
Total liabilities	5,580.3		0.4	6.9	(157.1	)	5,430.5
Retained earnings	20.3		—	—	—		20.3
Retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP	17.6		—	—	—		17.6
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	(20.2	)	—	—	—		(20.2	)
Equity attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	—		58.1	750.3	(27.2	)	781.2
Total liabilities and equity	5,598.0		58.5	757.2	(184.3	)	6,229.4

____________


(1)	Adjustments include the elimination of intercompany transactions between the company and its CIP, primarily the elimination of the company's equity at risk recorded as investments by the company (before consolidation) against either equity (private equity and real estate partnership funds) or subordinated debt (CLOs) of the funds.

3229

Table of Contents

Summary of Income Statement Impact of CIP


	Three months ended June 30, 2014										Three months ended March 31, 2015
$ in millions	CLOs - VIEs		Other VIEs		VOEs		Adjustments⁽¹⁾		Impact of CIP		CLOs - VIEs		Other VIEs		VOEs		Adjustments⁽²⁾		Impact of CIP
Total operating revenues	—		0.1		—		(8.7	)	(8.6	)	—		—		—		(9.3	)	(9.3	)
Total operating expenses	8.9		0.2		1.3		(8.7	)	1.7		20.3		0.2		1.0		(9.3	)	12.2
Operating income	(8.9	)	(0.1	)	(1.3	)	—		(10.3	)	(20.3	)	(0.2	)	(1.0	)	—		(21.5	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	—		—		—		(2.2	)	(2.2	)	—		—		—		(1.7	)	(1.7	)
Interest and dividend income	—		—		—		(0.6	)	(0.6	)	—		—		—		(1.4	)	(1.4	)
Other gains and losses, net	—		—		—		(4.7	)	(4.7	)	—		—		—		(2.7	)	(2.7	)
Interest and dividend income of CIP	50.1		—		—		(2.1	)	48.0		63.5		—		0.6		(3.9	)	60.2
Interest expense of CIP	(33.1	)	—		—		2.8		(30.3	)	(50.4	)	—		—		5.3		(45.1	)
Other gains/(losses) of CIP, net	(18.1	)	(0.2	)	52.3		2.8		36.8		7.2		4.2		18.1		(5.1	)	24.4
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	(10.0	)	(0.3	)	51.0		(4.0	)	36.7		—		4.0		17.7		(9.5	)	12.2
Income tax provision	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes	(10.0	)	(0.3	)	51.0		(4.0	)	36.7		—		4.0		17.7		(9.5	)	12.2
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Net income	(10.0	)	(0.3	)	51.0		(4.0	)	36.7		—		4.0		17.7		(9.5	)	12.2
Net (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	9.8		0.3		(48.8	)	—		(38.7	)	—		(3.9	)	(16.5	)	—		(20.4	)
Net income attributable to common shareholders	(0.2	)	—		2.2		(4.0	)	(2.0	)
Net income attributable to Invesco Ltd.											—		0.1		1.2		(9.5	)	(8.2	)

Three months ended June 30 , 2013
$ in millions CLOs - VIEs Other VIEs VOEs
Adjustments⁽¹⁾
Impact of CIP
Total operating revenues —
—
0.4
(9.4 ) (9.0 )
Total operating expenses 17.0
0.2
1.5
(9.4 ) 9.3
Operating income (17.0 ) (0.2 ) (1.1 ) —
(18.3 )
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates —
—
—
(0.8 ) (0.8 )
Interest and dividend income —
—
—
(1.8 ) (1.8 )
Interest and dividend income of CIP 53.1
—
—
(2.4 ) 50.7
Interest expense of CIP (34.8 ) —
—
4.2
(30.6 )
Other gains/ (losses) of CIP, net (10.7 ) 0.5
12.6
(4.0 ) (1.6 )
Income from continuing operations before income taxes (9.4 ) 0.3
11.5
(4.8 ) (2.4 )
Income tax provision —
—
—
—
—
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes (9.4 ) 0.3
11.5
(4.8 ) (2.4 )
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes —
—
—
—
—
Net income (9.4 ) 0.3
11.5
(4.8 ) (2.4 )
Net (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities 9.4
(0.3 ) (10.2 ) —
(1.1 )
Net income attributable to common shareholders —
—
1.3
(4.8 ) (3.5 )

~~Table of Contents~~

Six months ended June 30, 2014
$ in millions CLOs - VIEs Other VIEs VOEs
Adjustments⁽¹⁾
Impact of CIP
Total operating revenues —
0.1
—
(17.1 ) (17.0 )
Total operating expenses 26.8
0.5
4.1
(17.1 ) 14.3
Operating income (26.8 ) (0.4 ) (4.1 ) —
(31.3 )
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates —
—
—
(3.4 ) (3.4 )
Interest and dividend income —
—
—
(1.5 ) (1.5 )
Other gains and losses, net —
—
—
(4.7 ) (4.7 )
Interest and dividend income of CIP 102.0
—
—
(5.7 ) 96.3
Interest expense of CIP (67.9 ) —
—
7.3
(60.6 )
Other gains/(losses) of CIP, net (47.3 ) (1.2 ) 103.9
7.9
63.3
Income from continuing operations before income taxes (40.0 ) (1.6 ) 99.8
(0.1 ) 58.1
Income tax provision —
—
—
—
—
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes (40.0 ) (1.6 ) 99.8
(0.1 ) 58.1
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes —
—
—
—
—
Net income (40.0 ) (1.6 ) 99.8
(0.1 ) 58.1
Net (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities 40.0
1.6
(96.5 ) 0.1
(54.8 )
Net income attributable to common shareholders —
—
3.3
—
3.3


	Six months ended June 30, 2013										Three months ended March 31, 2014
$ in millions	CLOs - VIEs		Other VIEs		VOEs		Adjustments⁽¹⁾		Impact of CIP		CLOs - VIEs		Other VIEs		VOEs		Adjustments⁽²⁾		Impact of CIP
Total operating revenues	—		—		0.4		(18.2	)	(17.8	)	—		—		—		(8.4	)	(8.4	)
Total operating expenses	25.5		0.5		4.0		(18.2	)	11.8		17.9		0.3		2.8		(8.4	)	12.6
Operating income	(25.5	)	(0.5	)	(3.6	)	—		(29.6	)	(17.9	)	(0.3	)	(2.8	)	—		(21.0	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	—		—		—		(1.2	)	(1.2	)	—		—		—		(1.2	)	(1.2	)
Interest and dividend income	—		—		—		(3.7	)	(3.7	)	—		—		—		(0.9	)	(0.9	)
Interest and dividend income of CIP	106.7		—		—		(5.7	)	101.0		51.9		—		—		(3.6	)	48.3
Interest expense of CIP	(72.7	)	—		—		9.4		(63.3	)	(34.8	)	—		—		4.5		(30.3	)
Other gains/ (losses) of CIP, net	(39.2	)	0.2		17.3		(1.0	)	(22.7	)	(29.2	)	(1.0	)	51.6		5.1		26.5
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	(30.7	)	(0.3	)	13.7		(2.2	)	(19.5	)	(30.0	)	(1.3	)	48.8		3.9		21.4
Income tax provision	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes	(30.7	)	(0.3	)	13.7		(2.2	)	(19.5	)	(30.0	)	(1.3	)	48.8		3.9		21.4
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Net income	(30.7	)	(0.3	)	13.7		(2.2	)	(19.5	)	(30.0	)	(1.3	)	48.8		3.9		21.4
Net (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	30.8		0.3		(12.0	)	—		19.1		30.3		1.3		(47.7	)	—		(16.1	)
Net income attributable to common shareholders	0.1		—		1.7		(2.2	)	(0.4	)
Net income attributable to Invesco Ltd.											0.3		—		1.1		3.9		5.3

____________

~~(1)~~(2)

Adjustments include the elimination of intercompany transactions between the company and its CIP, primarily the elimination of management and performance fees expensed by the funds and recorded as operating revenues (before consolidation) by the company. These also include the reclassification of the company's gain or loss (representing the changes in the ~~market~~fair value of the company's holding in the consolidated CLOs) from other comprehensive income into other gains/losses upon consolidation.

3430

Table of Contents

The carrying values of investments held at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, and notes issued ~~by CIP~~as of December 31, 2014, are also their fair values. The company adopted ASU 2014-13 on January 1, 2015, and accordingly the notes issued by consolidated CLOs are no longer carried at fair value but are now measured under the measurement alternative discussed in Note 1, "Accounting Policies - Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements." The following tables present the fair value hierarchy levels of ~~investments held and notes issued by~~certain CIP balances which are measured at fair value as of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013:~~2014:


	As of June 30, 2014						As of March 31, 2015
$ in millions	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value Measurements	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
CLO collateral assets:
Bank loans	4,142.4		—	4,142.4	—		5,340.3	—	5,340.3	—
Bonds	106.2		—	106.2	—		77.3	—	77.3	—
Equity securities	9.2		—	9.2	—		6.4	—	6.4	—
Private equity fund assets:
Equity securities	248.8		22.5	—	226.3		330.6	7.1	7.9	315.6
Debt securities	0.8		—	—	0.8		27.5	—	—	27.5
Investments in other private equity funds	464.0		—	—	464.0		415.9	—	—	415.9
Total assets at fair value	4,971.4		22.5	4,257.8	691.1		6,198.0	7.1	5,431.9	759.0
Liabilities:
CLO notes	(4,301.5	)	—	—	(4,301.5	)
Total liabilities at fair value	(4,301.5	)	—	—	(4,301.5	)


	As of December 31, 2013						As of December 31, 2014
$ in millions	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)	Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)	Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
CLO collateral assets:
Bank loans	4,035.8		—	4,035.8	—		4,883.9		—	4,883.9	—
Bonds	133.1		—	133.1	—		88.9		—	88.9	—
Equity securities	14.1		—	14.1	—		6.4		—	6.4	—
Private equity fund assets:
Equity securities	106.0		47.3	—	58.7		337.9		9.7	—	328.2
Debt Securities							35.7		—	—	35.7
Investments in other private equity funds	442.2		—	—	442.2		410.0		—	—	410.0
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury	3.5		3.5	—	—
Total assets at fair value	4,734.7		50.8	4,183.0	500.9		5,762.8		9.7	4,979.2	773.9
Liabilities:
CLO notes	(4,181.7	)	—	—	(4,181.7	)	(5,149.6	)	—	—	(5,149.6	)
Total liabilities at fair value	(4,181.7	)	—	—	(4,181.7	)	(5,149.6	)	—	—	(5,149.6	)

3531

Table of Contents

The following tables show a reconciliation of the beginning and ending fair value measurements for level 3 assets and liabilities using significant unobservable inputs:

Three months ended June 30, 2014 Six months ended June 30, 2014
$ in millions Level 3 Assets Level 3 Liabilities Level 3 Assets Level 3 Liabilities
Beginning balance 560.7
(4,762.7 ) 500.9
(4,181.7 )
Purchases 96.9
—
139.6
—
Sales (18.9 ) —
(50.4 ) —
Issuances —
—
1.8
(714.1 )
Settlements —
136.3
—
297.7
Deconsolidation of CIP —
339.0
—
339.0
Gains and losses included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income* 52.4
(14.1 ) 99.2
(42.4 )
Ending balance 691.1
(4,301.5 ) 691.1
(4,301.5 )


	Three months ended June 30, 2013				Six months ended June 30, 2013				Three months ended March 31, 2015				Three months ended March 31, 2014
$ in millions	Level 3 Assets		Level 3 Liabilities		Level 3 Assets		Level 3 Liabilities		Level 3 Assets		Level 3 Liabilities		Level 3 Assets		Level 3 Liabilities
Beginning balance	535.1		(4,221.4	)	602.9		(3,899.4	)	773.9		(5,149.6	)	500.9		(4,181.7	)
Adjustment for adoption of ASU 2014-13									—		5,149.6		—		—
Purchases	1.6		—		13.3		—		33.6		—		42.7		—
Sales	(29.1	)	—		(91.1	)	—		(61.8	)	—		(31.5	)	—
Issuances	3.8		—		3.8		(405.0	)	—		—		1.8		(714.1	)
Settlements	—		208.9		—		361.7		—		—		—		161.4
Deconsolidation of CIP	(0.1	)	—		(18.4	)	—
Gains and losses included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income*	3.2		(32.5	)	4.4		(101.5	)	21.7		—		46.8		(28.3	)
Transfers to Level 2**	(6.1	)	—		(6.1	)	—
Foreign exchange	(0.1	)	0.7		(0.5	)	(0.1	)
Transfers to Levels 1 and 2**									(8.4	)	—		—		—
Ending balance	508.3		(4,044.3	)	508.3		(4,044.3	)	759.0		—		560.7		(4,762.7	)

____________

Included in gains/(losses) of CIP, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 are ~~$51.7~~$9.6 million in net unrealized ~~gains and~~ ~~$81.3 million~~ ~~in net unrealized~~ ~~gains~~losses attributable to investments still held at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 by CIP (three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~:March 31, 2014: $ ~~3.0~~29.6 million in net unrealized gains ~~and~~ ~~$14.0 million~~ ~~net unrealized~~ ~~losses~~ attributable to investments still held at ~~June 30, 2013~~)March 31, 2014).

During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2013, $6.1~~March 31, 2015, $7.8 million (three months ended March 31, 2014 : zero) of equity securities held by consolidated private equity funds were transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 due to the legal lock up requirements of of securities following the public offering of ~~securities in~~ the underlying ~~companies with legal lock-up restrictions in place.~~companies. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, $0.6 million (three months ended March 31, 2014 : zero) of equity securities held by consolidated private equity funds were transferred from Level 3 to Level 1 following the public offering of the underlying companies. For transfers due to public offerings, the company's policy is to use the fair value of the transferred security onat the ~~offering date.~~end of the period.

Unforeseen events might occur that would subsequently change the fair values of the investments ~~and~~(and therefore the debt of ~~CIP,~~CLOs, since it is measured as a calculated value based upon the fair value of the assets of CLOs with effect from January 1, 2015), but the impact of such changes would be ~~inconsequential~~limited to the ~~company due to its~~change in the fair values of the company's minimal investments in these products. ~~Any~~The impact of any gains or losses resulting from valuation changes in the investments ~~and debt~~ of non-CLO CIP attributable to the interests of third parties are ~~substantially~~ offset by resulting changes in gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities and therefore do not have a material effect on the financial condition, operating results (including earnings per share), liquidity or capital resources of the company's common shareholders. Similarly, any gains or losses resulting from valuation changes in the investments of CLOs attributable to the interests of third parties are offset by the calculated value of the notes issued by the CLOs (offsetting in other gains/(losses) of CIP) and therefore also do not have a material effect on the financial condition, operating results (including earnings per share), liquidity or capital resources of the company's common shareholders.

~~Fair value~~Value of consolidated CLOs

The company elected the fair value option for collateral assets held and notes issued by its consolidated CLOs to eliminate the measurement and recognition inconsistency that would otherwise arise from measuring assets and liabilities and recognizing the related gains and losses on different accounting bases.

~~Table~~ On January 1, 2015 the company adopted ASU 2014-13 and has elected the measurement alternative for the consolidated CLOs under which the notes issued by the CLOs are measured based on the fair value of ~~Contents~~the assets of the CLOs. Accordingly, the discussion below related to the fair value of notes issued by consolidated CLOs is applicable for the prior comparative period only.

The collateral assets held by consolidated CLOs are primarily invested in senior secured bank loans, bonds, and equity securities. Bank loan investments, which comprise the majority of consolidated CLO portfolio collateral, are senior secured corporate loans from a variety of industries, including but not limited to the aerospace and defense, broadcasting, technology, utilities, household products, healthcare, oil and gas, and finance industries. Bank loan investments mature at various dates between ~~2014~~2015 and 2023, pay interest at Libor plus a spread of up to ~~12.1%~~15.0%, and typically range in S&P credit rating categories from BBB down to unrated. Interest income on bank loans and bonds is recognized based on the unpaid principal balance and

Table of Contents

stated interest rate of these investments on an accrual basis. At ~~June 30, 2014, the fair value exceeded~~March 31, 2015, the unpaid principal balance exceeds the fair value of the senior secured bank loans and bonds by approximately ~~$0.1~~$83.6 million (December 31, ~~2013:~~2014: the unpaid principal balance exceeded the fair value of the senior secured bank loans and bonds by approximately ~~$6.3~~$56.2 million). ~~Approximately~~ ~~0.4%~~Less than 0.1% of the collateral assets are in default as of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 (December 31, ~~2013: 0.8%~~2014: less than 0.1% of the collateral assets were in default). CLO investments are valued based on price quotations provided by third party pricing sources. These third party sources aggregate indicative price quotations daily to provide the company with a price for the CLO investments. The company has developed internal controls to review the reasonableness and completeness of these price quotations on a daily basis. If necessary, price quotations are challenged through the third-party pricing source price challenge process. For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and the year ended December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, there were no price quotation challenges by the company.

In addition, the company's internal valuation committee conducts an annual due diligence review of all independent third-party pricing sources to review the provider's valuation methodology as well as ensure internal controls exist over the valuation of the CLO investments. In the event that the third-party pricing source is unable to price an investment, other relevant factors, data and information are considered, including: i) information relating to the market for the investment, including price quotations for and trading in the investment and interests in similar investments, the market environment, and investor attitudes towards the investment and interests in similar investments; ii) the characteristics of and fundamental analytical data relating to the investment, including, for senior secured corporate loans, the cost, size, current interest rate, period until next interest rate reset, maturity and base lending rate, the terms and conditions of the senior secured corporate loan and any related agreements, and the position of the senior secured corporate loan in the borrower's debt structure; iii) the nature, adequacy and value of the senior secured corporate loan's collateral, including the CLO's rights, remedies and interests with respect to the collateral; iv) for senior secured corporate loans, the creditworthiness of the borrower, based on an evaluation of its financial condition, financial statements and information about the business, cash flows, capital structure and future prospects; v) the reputation and financial condition of the agent and any intermediate participants in the senior secured corporate loan; and vi) general economic and market conditions affecting the fair value of the senior secured corporate loan.

Notes issued by consolidated CLOs mature at various dates between 2020 and ~~2026~~2027 and have a weighted average maturity of ~~8.7~~9.9 years. The notes are issued in various tranches with different risk profiles. The interest rates are generally variable rates based on Libor plus a pre-defined spread, which varies from 0.21% for the more senior tranches to ~~6.10%~~6.70% for the more subordinated tranches. At ~~June 30, 2014, the outstanding balance on the notes issued by consolidated CLOs exceeds their fair value by approximately~~ ~~$0.1 billion~~ ~~(December 31, 2013: $0.2 billion excess).~~ The investors in this debt are not affiliated with the company and have no recourse to the general credit of the company for this debt. Notes issued by CLOs are recorded at fair value at December 31, 2014 using an income approach, driven by cash flows expected to be received from the portfolio collateral assets. Fair value is determined using current information, notably market yields and projected cash flows of collateral assets based on forecasted default and recovery rates that a market participant would use in determining the current fair value of the notes, taking into account the overall credit quality of the issuers and the company's past experience in managing similar securities. Market yields, default rates and recovery rates used in the company's estimate of fair value vary based on the nature of the investments in the underlying collateral pools. In periods of rising market yields, default rates and lower debt recovery rates, the fair value, and therefore the carrying value, of the notes may be adversely affected. The current liquidity constraints within the market for CLO products require the use of certain unobservable inputs for CLO valuation. Once the undiscounted cash flows of the collateral assets have been determined, the company applies appropriate discount rates that a market participant would use to determine the discounted cash flow valuation of the notes.

Fair value of consolidated private equity funds

Consolidated private equity funds are generally structured as partnerships. Generally, the investment strategy of underlying holdings in these partnerships is to seek capital appreciation through direct investments in public or private companies with compelling business models or ideas or through investments in partnership investments that also invest in similar private or public companies. Various strategies may be used. Companies targeted could be distressed organizations, targets of leveraged buyouts or fledgling companies in need of venture capital. Investors generally may not redeem their investment until the partnership liquidates. Generally, the partnerships have a life that ranges from seven to twelve years unless dissolved earlier. The general partner may extend the partnership term up to a specified period of time as stated in the Partnership Agreement. Some partnerships allow the limited partners to cause an earlier termination upon the occurrence of certain events as specified in the Partnership Agreement.

~~Table of Contents~~

For private equity partnerships, fair value is determined by reviewing each investment for the sale of additional securities of an issuer to sophisticated investors or for investee financial conditions and fundamentals. Publicly traded portfolio investments are carried at market value as determined by their most recent quoted sale, or if there is no recent sale, at their most recent bid price. For these investments held by CIP, level 1 classification indicates that fair values have been determined using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the partnership has the ability to access. Level 2 classification may indicate that fair values have been determined using quoted prices in active markets but give effect to certain lock-up restrictions surrounding the holding period of the underlying investments.

Table of Contents

The fair value of level 3 investments held are derived from inputs that are unobservable and which reflect the limited partnerships' own determinations about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the investments, including assumptions about risk. These inputs are developed based on the partnership's own data, which is adjusted if information indicates that market participants would use different assumptions. The partnerships which invest directly into private equity portfolio companies (direct private equity funds) take into account various market conditions, subsequent rounds of financing, liquidity, financial condition, purchase multiples paid in other comparable third-party transactions, the price of securities of other companies comparable to the portfolio company, and operating results and other financial data of the portfolio company, as applicable.

The partnerships which invest into other private equity funds take into account information received from those underlying funds, including their reported net asset values and evidence as to their fair value approach, including consistency of their fair value application. These investments do not trade in active markets and represent illiquid long-term investments that generally require future capital commitments. The partnerships' reported share of the underlying net asset values of the underlying funds is used as a practical expedient, as allowed by ASC Topic 820, in arriving at fair value.

~~Table of Contents~~

Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements

The following tables show significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of level 3 assets and liabilities at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013:~~2014:



Assets and Liabilities *	Fair Value at March 31, 2015 ($ in millions)	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range	Weighted Average (by fair value)
Private Equity Funds --Equity Securities	264.1	Market Comparable	Revenue Multiple	2 - 4x	3.3x
			Discount	25%	25.0%
			Published valuation and/or broker quotes for similar types of assets	$26-101 million	$50.8 million



Assets and Liabilities *	Fair Value at ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2014 ($ in millions)	Valuation Technique	Unobservable Inputs	Range	Weighted Average (by fair value)
Private Equity Funds --Equity Securities	~~40.0~~273.2	Market Comparable	Revenue Multiple	12 - 4x	~~3.3x~~4.0x
			Discount	25% - 36%	30.9%
			Published valuation and/or broker quotes for similar types of assets	$27-104 million	$45.9 million
CLO ~~Debt~~Notes	~~(4,301.5)~~(5,149.6)	Discounted Cash Flow- USD	Assumed Default Rate***	1%0.4% - 2%2.3%	<1yr: ~~1.1%~~0.4% >1yr: ~~2.0%~~2.3%
			Spread over Libor **	~~125~~102 - ~~739bps~~801bps	~~218 bps~~



Assets and Liabilities *	~~Fair Value at~~ ~~December 31, 2013~~ ~~($ in millions)~~	~~Valuation Technique~~	~~Unobservable Inputs~~	~~Range~~	~~Weighted Average (by fair value)~~
~~Private Equity Funds --Equity Securities~~	~~58.7~~	~~Market Comparable~~	~~Revenue Multiple~~	~~1 - 5x~~	~~3.0x~~
			~~Discount~~	~~n/a~~	~~24.0%~~
~~CLO Debt~~	~~(4,181.7)~~	~~Discounted Cash Flow- USD~~	Assumed Default Rate***	~~1% - 2%~~	~~<1yr: 1.4% >1yr: 2.0%~~
			Spread over Libor **	~~123 - 864bps~~	~~208~~228 bps

____________

Excluded from the table above are certain equity securities held by consolidated private equity funds valued using recent private market transactions (~~June 30, 2014: $23.6~~(March 31, 2015: $65.6 million; December 31, ~~2013:~~ ~~$5.8 million~~)2014: $85.0 million) and third party appraisals (~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015: ~~$3.7~~$13.3 million; December 31, ~~2013: none)~~2014: $5.7 million). At ~~June 30,~~December 31, 2014,, certain tranches of the consolidated CLOs are valued using third party pricing information. Quantitative unobservable inputs for such valuations were not developed or adjusted by the company. Investments in equity securities and other private equity funds as of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 of $~~623.8~~415.9 million (as of December 31, ~~2013: $442.2 million )~~2014: $410.0 million) are also excluded from the table above as they are valued using the NAV practical expedient. The NAVs that have been provided are derived from the fair values of the underlying investments as of the consolidation date.


**	Lower spreads relate to the more senior tranches in the CLO note structure; higher spreads relate to the less senior tranches.


***	Assumed default rates listed in the table above apply to CLOs established prior to 2012. A default rate of ~~1.4%~~2.0% was assumed for CLOs established after January 1, 2012.

Table of Contents

The table below summarizes as of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, the nature of investments that are valued using the NAV as a practical expedient and any related liquidation restrictions or other factors which may impact the ultimate value realized:

June 30, 2014

December 31, 2013

March 31, 2015

December 31, 2014

in millions, except term data

Fair Value

Total Unfunded Commitments

Weighted Average Remaining Term ⁽²⁾

Fair Value

Total Unfunded Commitments

Weighted Average Remaining Term ⁽²⁾

Fair Value

Total Unfunded Commitments

Weighted Average Remaining Term ⁽²⁾

Fair Value

Total Unfunded Commitments

Weighted Average Remaining Term ⁽²⁾

Private equity fund of funds ⁽¹⁾

$464.0

$196.8

2.0 years

$426.3

$71.6

2.6 years

Private equity funds ⁽¹⁾

$159.8

$501.7

9.0 years

$15.9

$80.6

8.5 years

$415.9

$199.4

3.0 years

$410.0

$196.3

2.6 years

____________


(1)	These investments are not subject to redemption; however, for certain funds, the investors may sell or transfer their interest, which may require approval by the general partner of the underlying funds.


(2)	These investments are expected to be returned through distributions as a result of liquidations of the funds' underlying assets over the weighted average periods indicated.

~~Table of Contents~~

The following narrative will indicate the sensitivity of inputs illustrating the impact of significant increases to the inputs. An opposite impact would result for significant decreases in these inputs:

For investments held by consolidated private equity funds, significant increases in discounts in isolation would result in significantly lower fair value measurements, while significant increases in revenue multiple assumptions in isolation would result in significantly higher fair value measurements. An increase in discount assumptions would result in a directionally opposite change in the assumptions for revenue multiple resulting in lower fair value measurements.

For CLO notes, a change in the assumption used for spreads is generally accompanied by a directionally similar change in default rate. Significant increases in any of these inputs in isolation would result in significantly lower fair value measurements.

14. RELATED PARTIES

Certain managed funds are deemed to be affiliated entities under the related party definition in ASC 850, "Related Party Disclosures." Additionally, related parties include those defined in the company's proxy statement.

Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
$ in millions 2014 2013 2014 2013
Affiliated operating revenues:
Investment management fees 922.7
785.8
1,779.0
1,531.8
Service and distribution fees 211.3
211.6
446.7
413.3
Performance fees 2.2
2.5
28.1
34.0
Other 28.3
27.7
61.3
52.8
Total affiliated operating revenues 1,164.5
1,027.6
2,315.1
2,031.9

$ in millions June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013
Affiliated asset balances:
Cash and cash equivalents 408.5
447.8
Unsettled fund receivables 273.9
315.5
Accounts receivable 304.9
298.5
Investments 878.4
789.8
Assets held for policyholders 1,539.4
1,415.7
Other assets 5.5
5.4
Total affiliated asset balances 3,410.6
3,272.7

Affiliated liability balances:
Accrued compensation and benefits 128.2
151.6
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 19.5
19.5
Unsettled fund payables 504.0
389.9
Total affiliated liability balances 651.7
561.0

~~15. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS~~

On December 31, 2013, the company completed the sale of Atlantic Trust Private Wealth Management business ("Atlantic Trust") to the Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce ("CIBC") for a base purchase price of ~~$210 million~~ ~~less certain working capital and cash funding requirements.~~The results of Atlantic Trust, together with expenses and the gain associated with the sale, are reflected as discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and are therefore excluded from the continuing operations of Invesco. Comparative periods shown in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income have been adjusted to conform with this presentation.



	Three months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2015	2014
Affiliated operating revenues:
Investment management fees	881.4	856.3
Service and distribution fees	212.0	235.4
Performance fees	10.8	25.9
Other	27.6	33.0
Total affiliated operating revenues	1,131.8	1,150.6

4035

Table of Contents

~~The components of income from discontinued operations, net of tax, were as follows for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.~~

Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
$ in millions 2014 2013 2014 2013
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes 0.3
(7.2 ) (2.8 ) (0.8 )
Income tax (provision) benefit (0.1 ) 2.6
1.0
0.3
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes 0.2
(4.6 ) (1.8 ) (0.5 )



$ in millions	March 31, 2015	December 31, 2014
Affiliated asset balances:
Cash and cash equivalents	232.4	474.9
Unsettled fund receivables	287.0	254.2
Accounts receivable	345.4	332.9
Investments	947.0	848.8
Assets held for policyholders	2,572.3	1,697.5
Other assets	6.1	7.9
Total affiliated asset balances	4,390.2	3,616.2

Affiliated liability balances:
Accrued compensation and benefits	114.8	138.8
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	67.8	61.9
Unsettled fund payables	778.2	322.1
Total affiliated liability balances	960.8	522.8

1615. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On ~~July 31, 2014~~,April 30, 2015, the company declared a ~~second~~first quarter ~~2014~~2015 dividend of ~~25.0~~27.0 cents per share, payable on ~~September~~June 5, ~~2014~~,2015, to shareholders of record at the close of business on ~~August 21, 2014~~May 15, 2015 with an ex-dividend date of ~~August 19, 2014.~~May 13, 2015.

4136

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes thereto, which appear elsewhere in this Report. Except for the historical financial information, this Report may include statements that constitute “forward-looking statements” under the United States securities laws. Forward-looking statements include information concerning future results of our operations, expenses, earnings, liquidity, cash flow and capital expenditures, industry or market conditions, assets under management, acquisitions and divestitures, debt and our ability to obtain additional financing or make payments, regulatory developments, demand for and pricing of our products and other aspects of our business or general economic conditions. In addition, words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “plans,” “estimates,” “projects,” “forecasts,” and future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “may,” “could,” “should,” and “would” as well as any other statement that necessarily depends on future events, are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are not guarantees, and they involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Although we make such statements based on assumptions that we believe to be reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from our expectations. We caution investors not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements and urge you to carefully consider the risks described in this Report and our most recent Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange ~~Commission.~~Commission ("SEC").

You may obtain these reports from the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update the information in any public disclosure if any forward-looking statement later turns out to be inaccurate.

References

In this Report, unless otherwise specified, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” “company,” “Invesco,” and “Invesco Ltd.” refer to Invesco Ltd., a company incorporated in Bermuda, and its subsidiaries.

Executive Overview

The following executive overview summarizes the significant trends affecting our results of operations and financial condition for the periods presented. This overview and the remainder of this management's discussion and analysis supplements and should be read in conjunction with the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Invesco Ltd. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “company” or “Invesco”) and the notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Report.

During the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, returns from global equity markets were positive ~~despite geopolitical uncertainty~~amid heightened central bank stimulus measures and renewed economic growth in ~~Ukraine~~Europe and ~~the Middle East, and a continued decline in monetary easing from the Federal Reserve~~Japan. Equities in the U.S. ~~The~~were only slightly positive, as seen by the S&P 500 Index returning just 0.4%, as market participants remained focused on the timing of the Federal Reserve’s impending interest rate hike. Further, the U.S. Dollar strengthened against most currencies, which will negatively impact the earnings of U.S. multinational corporations. Markets in the U.K. returned 3.2% despite uncertainty related to the upcoming elections. In Japan, positive economic data, continued stimulus measures by the Bank of Japan and a weaker currency aided the outlook for corporate profits driving equity prices higher. The Nikkei 225 index returned just over 10% during the three month period. Bond returns in the U.S. ~~ended up 4.7% for~~were also positive during the ~~period. Equity indices in~~quarter as the U.K., Japan and the emerging markets also increased 2.2%, 2.3% and 5.6%, respectively. Bond market prices ended up for the period as U.S. economic data continued to point to slow, but steady, growth. Inflation in the U.S. also supported bond prices, as it was positive enough to dampen concerns about deflation, but still low enough to support the Federal Reserve’s current monetary policy. The Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond ~~Index~~index rose ~~2.0% during~~1.6%. Investors favored the ~~second quarter.~~relative value of U.S bonds due to the divergence of monetary policies between the Federal Reserve, who is expected to begin tightening monetary conditions, and other central banks who are currently loosening monetary conditions in their economies.

The table below summarizes returns based on price appreciation/(depreciation) of several major market indices in local currencies for the ~~three- and six-month~~three-month periods ended ~~June 30~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014:


	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,				Three months ended March 31,
Equity Index	2014		2013		2014		2013		2015		2014
S&P 500	4.7	%	2.4	%	6.5	%	12.6	%	0.4	%	1.3	%
FTSE 100	2.2	%	(3.1	)%	(0.1	)%	5.4	%	3.2	%	(2.2	)%
Nikkei 225	2.3	%	10.3	%	(6.9	)%	31.6	%	10.1	%	(9.0	)%
MSCI Emerging Markets	5.6	%	(9.1	)%	4.8	%	(10.9	)%	1.9	%	(0.8	)%
Bond Index
Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond	2.0	%	(2.3	)%	3.9	%	(2.4	)%	1.6	%	1.8	%

Table of Contents

A significant portion of our business and assets under management (AUM) is based outside of the U.S. The strengthening or weakening of the U.S. Dollar against other currencies, primarily the Pound Sterling, Canadian dollar, Yen and Euro, will impact our reported revenues and expenses from period to period. Additionally, our revenues are directly influenced by the level and composition of our AUM. Therefore, movements in global capital market levels, net new business inflows (or

~~Table of Contents~~

outflows) and changes in the mix of investment products between asset classes and geographies may materially affect our revenues from period to period.

Invesco benefits from the long-term efforts to ensure a diversified base of AUM. One of Invesco's core strengths, and a key differentiator for the company within the industry, is our broad diversification across client domiciles, asset classes and distribution channels. Our geographical diversification recognizes growth opportunities in different parts of the world. This broad diversification mitigates the impact on Invesco of different market cycles and enables the company to take advantage of growth opportunities in various markets and channels.

Regulators in various jurisdictions have proposed or are exploring changes to the manner in which fund distributors are compensated for the services they provide. The U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has implemented its Retail Distribution Review (“RDR”), which is expected to reshape the manner in which retail investment funds are sold in the U.K. by changing how retail clients pay for investment advice given in respect of all retail investment products. During the first half of 2014, Invesco began transitioning investment funds to this new basis by offering new fund classes to U.K. investors which are priced at a reduced gross management fee, but which in turn do not result in the payment by the company of a distribution fee to the intermediary. All new retail clients must select the new fund classes while existing clients will transition to the new classes over a two-year period. Separately, Invesco introduced a single Fund Management Fee (FMF) during the second quarter of 2014 for U.K. retail funds, replacing the separate annual management fee and registration fee. This simplified fee structure is a proactive response to the regulatory promotion of providing clients with a clear disclosure of product charges. Invesco's U.K. business has taken the lead in the industry in moving to this single FMF. The U.K. business' move to the single FMF and the change to distribution fees are not expected to have a significant impact on net revenues as investors move into these offerings. In the U.S., the SEC has previously proposed and may repropose significant changes to Rule 12b-1. Other countries have announced similar distribution fee reviews.

The investment management industry is subject to extensive levels of ongoing regulatory oversight and examination. In the United States, United Kingdom, and other jurisdictions in which the company operates, governmental authorities regularly make inquiries, hold investigations and administer market conduct examinations with respect to compliance with applicable laws and regulations. On April 28, 2014, the U.K. FCA announced the settlement of an enforcement proceeding pertaining to the company's compliance with certain FCA rules and regulations for the period from May 2008 to November 2012. The company paid a penalty of £18.6 million ($31.1 million) under this settlement. This charge, together with settlement-related legal costs of $0.5 million, was recorded in the first quarter of ~~2014~~2015, Invesco remained focused on its multi-year priorities, which are designed to deliver strong, long-term investment performance and ~~reduced diluted earnings per share by $0.07. The company believes its current systems and controls now are adequate and in compliance with applicable rules and regulations.~~

~~Retaining highly skilled technical and management personnel is important~~better outcomes to ~~our ability to attract and retain clients and retail shareholder accounts. Our policy has been to provide our investment management professionals with~~clients. As a supportive professional working environment and compensation and benefits that we believe are competitive with other leading investment management firms. However, we may not be successful in retaining our key personnel, and the loss of key individuals or significant investment management personnel can reduce the attractivenessresult of our ~~products~~efforts, Invesco received a number of awards recognizing the firm’s strong investment performance, including being named as one of the three top fund families in Barron’s Best Fund Families of 2014, in which the magazine cited the firm’s top-level performance over one, five and ten years. Strong investment performance, combined with the comprehensive range of strategies and capabilities we offer to ~~potential and current clients. On April 29, 2014, the former head~~help clients achieve their desired investment outcomes, contributed to strong long-term net flows of ~~U.K. Equities, Neil Woodford, left the company. The company executed its succession planning strategy, and effective March 6, 2014, Mark Barnett became the named lead manager~~$10.3 billion for the ~~Invesco Perpetual High Income Fund and the Invesco Perpetual Income Fund, previously managed by Mr. Woodford.~~

Between the announcement of Mr. Woodford's departure on October 15, 2013 and April 29, 2014, U.K. equity income AUM experienced net outflows of $15.5 billion. During April 2014, U.K. AUM experienced a single client withdrawal of $13.1 billion which included $6.2 billion of U.K. equity income AUM, $1.3 billion of other equity AUM and $5.6 billion of balanced AUM. Excluding this single client withdrawal, U.K. equity income AUM net flows would have improved relative to the prior quarter. Our total AUM in EMEA at June 30, 2014 were $176.1 billion. Excluding the net outflows from U.K. equity income, EMEA long-term net inflows for the second quarter of 2014 were $0.3 billion and for the first half of 2014 were $6.8 billion.

On July 23, 2014, the SEC voted to approve new rules to require institutional prime money market funds and institutional municipal money market funds to maintain a floating net asset value (FNAV) for sales and redemptions based on the current market value of the securities in their portfolio. The requirement will result in the daily share price of these money market funds fluctuating along with changes in the market-based value of the funds' investments. Our initial evaluation of these new rules suggests that they will apply to approximately $30 billion of our AUM. The changes will need to be implemented over a two-year period.

One of the company's strategic objectives is to harness the power of our global platform by improving effectiveness and efficiency, and allocating our resources to the opportunities that will best benefit clients and our business. Consistent with this objective, during the first quarter, an initiative was undertaken to align the company's location footprint to reflect current and future business needs. This resulted in the company recording business optimization initiative charges in the first quarter of

~~Table of Contents~~

~~$43.0 million that included $35.8 million associated with vacating leased properties and $7.2 million of staff severance. These charges reduced first quarter diluted earnings per share by $0.08.~~

Presentation of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The company provides investment management services to, and has transactions with, various private equity, real estate, fund-of-funds, collateralized loan obligation products (CLOs), and other investment entities sponsored by the company for the investment of client assets in the normal course of business. The company serves as the investment manager, making day-to-day investment decisions concerning the assets of the products.

Investment products that are consolidated are referred to in this Report as either Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products (CSIP), which generally includes consolidated sponsored investment products in which Invesco holds the majority of the voting rights or partnerships in which the company has substantive equity at risk but in which the other investors lack removal or liquidation rights, or Consolidated Investment Products (CIP), which includes consolidated nominally-held investment products. This distinction is important, as it differentiates the company's economic risk associated with each type of consolidated managed fund. The company's economic risk with respect to each investment in a CSIP and a CIP is limited to its equity ownership and any uncollected management and performance fees. Gains and losses arising from nominally-held CIP do not have a significant impact on the company's results of operations, liquidity, or capital resources. Gains and losses arising from majority-held CSIP could have a significant impact on the company's results of operations, as the company has greater economic risk associated with its investment. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements, - Note 1 ~~"Accounting Policies," Note~~ 12,, "Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products," and Note 13,, "Consolidated Investment Products," for additional information regarding the impact of the consolidation of managed funds.

The majority of the company's CIP balances are CLO-related. The collateral assets of the CLOs are held solely to satisfy the obligations of the CLOs. The company has no right to the benefits from, nor does it bear the risks associated with, the collateral assets held by the CLOs, beyond the company's minimal direct investments in, and management and performance fees generated from, the CLOs. If the company were to liquidate, the collateral assets would not be available to the general creditors of the company, and as a result, the company does not consider them to be company assets. Likewise, the investors in the CLOs have no recourse to the general credit of the company for the notes issued by the CLOs. The company therefore does not consider this debt to be a company liability.

The impact of CIP is so significant to the presentation of the company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (but not to the underlying financial condition or results of operations of the company) that the company has elected to deconsolidate these products in its non-GAAP disclosures. The following discussion therefore combines the results presented under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) with the company’s non-GAAP presentation. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains four distinct sections, which follow after the Assets Under Management discussion:

Results of Operations (three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014);

Schedule of Non-GAAP Information;

Balance Sheet Discussion; and

Liquidity and Capital Resources.

Table of Contents

Each of the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statement summary sections (Results of Operations, Balance Sheet Discussion, and Liquidity and Capital Resources) begins with a table illustrating the impact of CIP relative to the company's consolidated totals. The impact is illustrated by a column which shows the dollar-value change in the consolidated figures, as caused by the consolidation of CIP. For example, the impact of CIP on operating revenues for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 was a reduction of ~~$8.6 million and a reduction of $17.0 million, respectively.~~$9.3 million. This indicates that their consolidation reduced consolidated revenues by this amount, reflecting the elimination upon their consolidation of the operating revenues earned by Invesco for managing these investment products.

The narrative in each of these sections separately provides discussion of the underlying financial statement activity for the company, before consolidation of CIP, as well as of the financial statement activity of CIP. Additionally, wherever a non-GAAP measure is referenced, a disclosure will follow in the narrative or in the note referring the reader to the Schedule of Non-GAAP Information, where additional details regarding the use of the non-GAAP measure by the company are disclosed, along with reconciliations of the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures to the non-GAAP measures. To further enhance the readability of the Results of Operations section, separate tables for each of the revenue, expense, and other income and expenses (non-operating income/expense) sections of the income statement introduce the narrative that follows, providing a section-by-section review of the company’s income statements for the periods presented.

4439

Table of Contents

Summary Operating Information

Summary operating information is presented in the table below:


$ in millions, other than per share amounts, operating margins, ratios and AUM	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,				Three months ended March 31,
U.S. GAAP Financial Measures Summary ⁽¹⁾	2014		2013		2014		2013		2015		2014
Operating revenues	1,289.9		1,135.5		2,559.4		2,247.7		1,291.6		1,269.5
Operating income	354.8		273.9		599.1		540.9		338.1		244.3
Operating margin	27.5	%	24.1	%	23.4	%	24.1	%	26.2	%	19.2	%
Net income attributable to common shareholders	274.5		202.6		462.3		424.8
Net income attributable to Invesco Ltd.									259.6		187.8
Diluted EPS	0.63		0.45		1.06		0.94		0.60		0.43
Debt/equity ratio including CIP (%)	63.2	%	62.7	%	63.2	%	62.7	%	79.8	%	71.3	%

Non-GAAP Financial Measures Summary
Net revenues ⁽²⁾	901.0		790.3		1,788.8		1,578.3		917.5		887.8
Adjusted operating income ⁽³⁾	377.0		310.6		740.0		616.8		374.4		363.0
Adjusted operating margin ⁽³⁾	41.8	%	39.3	%	41.4	%	39.1	%	40.8	%	40.9	%
Adjusted net income attributable to common shareholders ⁽⁴⁾	282.4		223.7		544.0		449.2
Adjusted net income attributable to Invesco Ltd. ⁽⁴⁾									272.1		261.6
Adjusted diluted EPS ⁽⁴⁾	0.65		0.50		1.25		1.00		0.63		0.60
Debt/equity ratio excluding CIP (%) ⁽⁵⁾	18.7	%	17.9	%	18.7	%	17.9	%	19.8	%	19.3	%

Assets Under Management ⁽¹⁾
Ending AUM (billions)	802.4		705.6		802.4		705.6		798.3		787.3
Average AUM (billions)	790.1		719.8		784.9		705.7		795.4		779.6

_________


(1)	On December 31, 2013, the company completed the sale of Atlantic Trust. The company has adopted a discontinued operations presentation for the disposed business. Amounts presented represent continuing operations and exclude Atlantic Trust, with the exception of net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. and diluted earnings per share.

(2)

Net revenues is a non-GAAP financial measure. Net revenues are operating revenues plus our proportional share of the net revenues of our joint venture investments, less third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses, plus management and performance fees earned from CIP, less other revenue recorded by CIP, plus other reconciling items. See "Schedule of Non-GAAP Information," for the reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues.

(3)

Adjusted operating income and adjusted operating margin are non-GAAP financial measures. Adjusted operating margin is adjusted operating income divided by net revenues. Adjusted operating income includes operating income plus our proportional share of the net operating income of our joint venture investments, the operating income impact of the consolidation of investment products, acquisition/disposition-related adjustments, compensation expense related to market valuation changes in deferred compensation plans, and other reconciling items. See "Schedule of Non-GAAP Information," for the reconciliation of operating income to adjusted operating income.

(4)

Adjusted net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. and adjusted diluted EPS are non-GAAP financial measures. Adjusted net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. is net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. adjusted to exclude the net income of CIP, add back acquisition/disposition related adjustments, the net income impact of deferred compensation plans and other reconciling items. Adjustments made to net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. are tax-effected in arriving at adjusted net income attributable to ~~common shareholders.~~Invesco Ltd.. By calculation, adjusted diluted EPS is adjusted net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. divided by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (for diluted EPS). See "Schedule of Non-GAAP Information," for the reconciliation of net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. to adjusted net income attributable to ~~common shareholders.~~Invesco Ltd.


(5)	The debt-to-equity ratio excluding CIP is a non-GAAP financial measure. See the "Liquidity and Capital Resources" section for a recalculation of this ratio and other important disclosures.

4540

Table of Contents

Investment Capabilities Performance Overview

Invesco's first strategic priority is to achieve strong investment performance over the long-term for our clients. The table below presents the one-, three- and five-year performance of our actively managed investment products measured by the percentage of AUM ahead of benchmark and AUM in the top half of peer group.⁽¹⁾


	Benchmark Comparison						Peer Group Comparison						Benchmark Comparison						Peer Group Comparison
	% of AUM Ahead of Benchmark						% of AUM In Top Half of Peer Group						% of AUM Ahead of Benchmark						% of AUM In Top Half of Peer Group
	1yr		3yr		5yr		1yr		3yr		5yr		1yr		3yr		5yr		1yr		3yr		5yr
Equities
U.S. Core	34	%	40	%	24	%	30	%	42	%	39	%	15	%	20	%	29	%	33	%	35	%	48	%
U.S. Growth	95	%	24	%	24	%	95	%	24	%	73	%	12	%	38	%	25	%	51	%	51	%	25	%
U.S. Value	54	%	57	%	54	%	45	%	57	%	79	%	38	%	66	%	56	%	40	%	100	%	77	%
Sector Funds	81	%	55	%	64	%	35	%	21	%	50	%	72	%	61	%	75	%	25	%	10	%	17	%
U.K.	94	%	100	%	98	%	98	%	98	%	98	%	99	%	100	%	100	%	99	%	100	%	98	%
Canadian	70	%	100	%	100	%	80	%	100	%	100	%	17	%	52	%	52	%	0	%	39	%	52	%
Asian	79	%	86	%	84	%	68	%	75	%	72	%	20	%	91	%	82	%	32	%	70	%	68	%
European	95	%	100	%	100	%	65	%	99	%	92	%	52	%	98	%	100	%	57	%	86	%	94	%
Global	67	%	87	%	82	%	81	%	92	%	87	%	27	%	71	%	86	%	60	%	83	%	86	%
Global Ex U.S. and Emerging Markets	80	%	99	%	99	%	82	%	96	%	97	%	85	%	86	%	99	%	86	%	86	%	98	%
Fixed Income
Money Market	65	%	65	%	35	%	95	%	95	%	96	%	66	%	67	%	67	%	91	%	93	%	94	%
U.S. Fixed Income	86	%	89	%	100	%	69	%	95	%	95	%	85	%	93	%	92	%	78	%	87	%	96	%
Global Fixed Income	89	%	87	%	98	%	86	%	87	%	84	%	60	%	96	%	67	%	52	%	56	%	55	%
Stable Value	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%	100	%
Other
Alternatives	40	%	64	%	24	%	32	%	54	%	28	%	90	%	39	%	46	%	57	%	61	%	59	%
Balanced	44	%	73	%	70	%	70	%	98	%	70	%	51	%	54	%	71	%	42	%	93	%	100	%

_____________________________

(1)

AUM measured in the one-, three-, and five-year peer group rankings represents ~~61%~~58%, ~~61%~~58%, and ~~60%~~58% of total Invesco AUM, respectively, and AUM measured versus benchmark on a one-, three-, and five-year basis represents ~~72%~~70%, ~~71%~~69%, and ~~69%~~68% of total Invesco AUM, respectively, as of ~~June 30, 2014~~.March 31, 2015. Peer group rankings are sourced from a widely-used third party ranking agency in each fund's market (Lipper, Morningstar, IMA, Russell, Mercer, eVestment Alliance, SITCA, Value Research) and are asset-weighted in USD. Rankings are as of prior quarter-end for most institutional products and preceding month-end for Australian retail funds due to their late release by third parties. Rankings for the most representative fund in each Global Investment Performance Standard (GIPS) composite are applied to all products within each GIPS composite. Excludes passive products, closed-end funds, private equity limited partnerships, non-discretionary direct real estate, unit investment trusts, fund-of-funds with component funds managed by Invesco, stable value building block funds, and ~~CLOs.~~CDOs. Certain funds and products were excluded from the analysis because of limited benchmark or peer group data. Had these been available, results may have been different. These results are preliminary and subject to revision. Performance assumes the reinvestment of dividends. Past performance is not indicative of future results and may not reflect an investor's experience.

As of ~~June 30, 2014, 72%~~March 31, 2015, 62%, ~~80%~~81% and 80% of ranked actively managed assets performed in the top half of peer groups on a one-year, three-year and five-year basis respectively. The U.K., Asian, ~~Continental~~ European and Global Ex U.S. and Emerging Markets equities have had strong relative performance, with ~~84%~~82% or more of assets beating their benchmark over three- and five-year periods. Additionally, the U.K., ~~Canadian Continental~~ European and Global Ex U.S. and Emerging Markets reflect a long-term track record of beating their peers, with 98%, 94% and 98%, respectively of ranked assets ahead of peers on a five-year basis. Our balanced asset class achieved a strong ~~performance~~peer group comparison with ~~92% or more~~100% of ranked assets ~~beating peers~~in the top half on a five-year basis. Within our fixed income asset class, Stable Value products have achieved excellent long-term performance with 100% of AUM ahead of benchmark and in the top half on a one-, three- and five-year basis.

4641

Table of Contents

Assets Under Management movements for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared with the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014

The following presentation and discussion of AUM includes Passive and Active AUM. Passive AUM include ETFs, UITs, leveraged fund balances upon which we do not earn a fee, and other passive mandates. Active AUM are total AUM less Passive AUM.

The AUM tables and the discussion below refer to AUM as long-term and short-term. ~~Short-term~~Long-term AUM ~~include~~excludes institutional money market and Invesco PowerShares QQQ ~~AUM. Long-term AUM are total AUM less short-term~~ AUM.

Changes in AUM were as follows:


	For the three months ended June 30,												For the three months ended March 31,
	2014						2013						2015						2014
$ in billions	Total AUM		Active		Passive		Total AUM		Active		Passive		Total AUM		Active		Passive		Total AUM		Active		Passive
March 31	787.3		644.4		142.9		707.7		584.6		123.1
January 1													792.4		651.0		141.4		778.7		639.0		139.7
Long-term inflows	42.5		36.1		6.4		44.4		32.6		11.8		50.5		40.6		9.9		50.2		41.6		8.6
Long-term outflows	(49.4	)	(44.1	)	(5.3	)	(43.0	)	(32.5	)	(10.5	)	(40.2	)	(33.8	)	(6.4	)	(43.7	)	(38.4	)	(5.3	)
Long-term net flows	(6.9	)	(8.0	)	1.1		1.4		0.1		1.3		10.3		6.8		3.5		6.5		3.2		3.3
Net flows in Invesco Powershares QQQ fund	(3.0	)	—		(3.0	)	0.7		—		0.7		(2.6	)	—		(2.6	)	(1.3	)	—		(1.3	)
Net flows in institutional money market funds	1.1		1.1		—		(0.7	)	(0.7	)	—		(6.0	)	(6.0	)	—		(6.1	)	(6.1	)	—
Total net flows	(8.8	)	(6.9	)	(1.9	)	1.4		(0.6	)	2.0		1.7		0.8		0.9		(0.9	)	(2.9	)	2.0
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	19.9		15.1		4.8		(1.3	)	(0.3	)	(1.0	)	14.4		13.0		1.4		9.4		8.2		1.2
Acquisitions/dispositions, net													(0.7	)	—		(0.7	)	—		—		—
Foreign currency translation	4.0		4.0		—		(2.2	)	(1.8	)	(0.4	)	(9.5	)	(9.5	)	—		0.1		0.1		—
June 30	802.4		656.6		145.8		705.6		581.9		123.7
March 31													798.3		655.3		143.0		787.3		644.4		142.9
Average AUM
Average long-term AUM	674.7		574.9		99.8		609.1		517.1		92.0		685.0		581.8		103.2		659.7		564.5		95.2
Average short-term AUM	115.4		73.3		42.1		110.7		76.8		33.9
Average AUM	790.1		648.2		141.9		719.8		593.9		125.9		795.4		652.7		142.7		779.6		639.0		140.6
Revenue yield
Gross revenue yield on AUM ⁽¹⁾	65.7		77.3		13.2		63.4		74.5		11.6		65.4		76.8		13.3		65.6		77.3		12.7
Gross revenue yield on AUM before performance fees ⁽¹⁾	65.4		77.0		13.2		63.1		74.1		11.6		63.0		73.9		13.3		64.0		75.3		12.7
Net revenue yield on AUM ⁽²⁾	45.6		52.7		13.2		43.9		50.8		11.6		46.1		53.3		13.3		45.6		52.8		12.7
Net revenue yield on AUM before performance fees ⁽²⁾	45.2		52.3		13.2		43.4		50.2		11.6		43.5		50.1		13.3		43.8		50.7		12.7

(1)

Gross revenue yield on AUM is equal to annualized total operating revenues divided by average AUM, excluding joint venture (JV) AUM. Our share of the average AUM in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 for our JVs in China was ~~$4.7~~$5.0 billion (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $3.6~~March 31, 2014: $5.1 billion). It is appropriate to exclude the average AUM of our JVs for purposes of computing gross revenue yield on AUM because the revenues resulting from these AUM are not presented in our operating revenues. Under U.S. GAAP, our share of the net income of the JVs is recorded as equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Additionally, the numerator of the gross revenue yield measure, operating revenues, excludes the management fees earned from CIP; however, the denominator of the measure includes the AUM of these investment products. Therefore, the gross revenue yield measure is not considered representative of the company's true effective fee rate from AUM.


(2)	Net revenue yield on AUM is equal to annualized net revenues divided by average AUM. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for a reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues.

Flows

AUM at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 were ~~$802.4~~$798.3 billion (~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$705.6 billion~~)(March 31, 2014: $787.3 billion). During the three months ended~~June 30, 2014~~, March 31, 2015, we experienced long-term net ~~outflows~~inflows of ~~$6.9 billion~~. U.K. AUM experienced a single client withdrawal of $13.1 billion during the second quarter which included $6.2 billion of U.K. equity income AUM outflows, $1.3 billion of other equity AUM outflows and $5.6 billion of balanced AUM outflows.$10.3 billion. We also experienced net outflows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund of ~~$3.0~~$2.6 billion, ~~partially offset by~~along with net ~~inflows~~outflows in institutional money market funds of ~~$1.1~~$6.0 billion during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~.March 31, 2015. Net ~~outflows~~inflows during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 included ~~active~~ net long-term ~~outflows~~inflows of ~~$8.0~~active AUM of $6.8 billion and net long-term inflows of passive AUM of $3.5 billion. Net long-term inflows were split between our retail distribution channel of $7.5 billion and our institutional channel of $2.8 billion. On a client domicile basis, long-term net

4742

Table of Contents

~~billion, partially offset by net long-term~~ inflows of ~~passive AUM of $1.1 billion. Net flows~~$4.1 billion, $0.6 billion, $5.0 billion and $0.6 billion were ~~driven by net outflows from our retail distribution channel of $8.2 billion, offset by net inflows into our institutional channel of $1.3 billion.~~ experienced in the U.S., the U.K., Continental Europe and Asia, respectively, during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

During the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014, we experienced total net outflows of $0.9 billion and long-term net inflows of $6.5 billion. Institutional money market funds and ~~total net inflows of $1.4 billion. Net inflows of~~the Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund also reflected net outflows of ~~$0.7~~$6.1 billion ~~were offset by outflows in institutional money market funds of $0.7~~and $1.3 billion, respectively, during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014. Long-term net ~~inflows~~outflows during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 ~~included~~were primarily active AUM, with inflows of $3.2 billion, while passive AUM ~~of $1.3~~had $3.3 billion ~~and active inflows of $0.1 billion.~~inflows. Long-term net flows in ~~2013~~the three months ended March 31, 2014 were driven by net inflows of ~~$4.9~~$7.6 billion into our retail distribution channel, offset by net outflows from our institutional channel of ~~$3.5~~$1.1 billion. We experienced net long-term inflows in our equity, alternatives and balanced asset ~~class, money market funds, fixed income and alternatives,~~classes, partially offset by net ~~long-term~~ outflows in our ~~equity~~fixed income and money market AUM.

Average AUM during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 were ~~$790.1~~$795.4 billion, compared to ~~$719.8~~$779.6 billion for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014.

Market Returns

During the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, positive market movement increased AUM by ~~$19.9~~$14.4 billion, with ~~$14.4 billion attributed to~~gains in our equity class of $13.6 billion, balanced asset ~~class. Our~~class of $0.7 billion and fixed income class of $0.4 billion. These gains were partly offset by decreases of $0.2 billion and $0.1 billion in value of the alternatives and ~~balanced~~money market asset classes, ~~were also positively impacted by the change in market valuations during the period, with market increases of $2.1 billion, $1.9 billion and $1.5 billion,~~ respectively. During the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014, market ~~losses decreased~~gains increased AUM by ~~$1.3~~$9.4 billion and included increases in the market value of our equity assets of $5.0 billion, fixed income assets of $2.3 billion, alternative assets of $1.6 billion and balanced fund assets of $0.8 billion. These market valuation gains were partly offset by a ~~$2.7~~decrease of $0.3 billion ~~decrease~~ in the value of our fixed income asset class, with the balanced and alternative asset classes also experiencing losses of $1.5 billion and $1.6 billion, respectively. These market valuation losses were partly offset by an increase in market value of $4.3 billion in our equity asset class and an increase in money market ~~assets of $0.2 billion.~~assets.

Foreign Exchange Rates

The table below illustrates the spot foreign exchange rates used for translation of non-U.S. Dollar denominated AUM into U.S. Dollars:


Foreign Exchange Rates	June 30, 2014	March 31, 2014	June 30, 2013	March 31, 2013	March 31, 2015	December 31, 2014	March 31, 2014	December 31, 2013
Pound Sterling ($ per £)	1.710	1.667	1.518	1.520	1.485	1.559	1.667	1.655
Canadian Dollar (CAD per $)	1.066	1.104	1.054	1.018	1.267	1.158	1.104	1.063
Japan (¥ per $)	101.310	102.980	99.320	94.160	119.905	119.880	102.980	105.080
Euro ($ per Euro)	1.369	1.378	1.300	1.282	1.074	1.210	1.378	1.378

During the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, we experienced ~~increases~~decreases in AUM of ~~$4.0~~$9.5 billion due to changes in foreign exchange rates. Changes in foreign exchange rates in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 were driven primarily by the ~~strengthening~~weakening of the Pound Sterling relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in the translation of our Pound Sterling-based AUM into U.S. Dollars. The Canadian Dollar, Japanese Yen and ~~the Canadian Dollar~~Euro also ~~strengthened~~weakened relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in the translation of our ~~Yen-based and~~ Canadian Dollar-based, ~~AUM into U.S. Dollars. These changes were partially offset by the weakening of the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in the translation of our~~Japanese Yen-based and Euro-based AUM into U.S. ~~Dollars.~~Dollars, respectively.

The impact of the change in foreign exchange rates in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 was driven primarily by the ~~weakening~~strengthening of the Pound Sterling ~~the Canadian Dollar and the Japanese Yen~~ relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in the translation of our Sterling-based Canadian Dollar-based, and Japanese Yen-based AUM into U.S. Dollars, partially offset by the strengthening of the Euro relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in the translation of our Euro-based AUM into U.S. Dollars.

Revenue Yield

Net revenue yield on AUM increased ~~1.7~~0.5 basis points to ~~45.6~~46.1 basis points in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 when compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 yield of ~~43.9~~45.6 basis points. Excluding performance fees, the net revenue yield ~~increased 1.8~~decreased 0.3 basis points to ~~45.2~~43.5 basis points in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: 43.4~~March 31, 2014: 43.8 basis points).

Changes in our AUM mix significantly impact our net revenue yield. For example, on an asset class basis, our equity and balanced AUM generally earn a higher net revenue rate than money market and fixed income AUM. The combination of average equity and average balanced AUM ~~increased~~decreased to ~~55.4%~~55.0% in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~52.2%~~56.0% of total average AUM in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014. This resulted in a ~~lower~~higher proportion of average assets in money market and fixed income AUM in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 when compared to the three months ended~~June 30, 2013. This~~

4843

Table of Contents

March 31, 2014. This change in asset class mix correlates with the ~~increase~~decrease in net revenue yield on AUM before performance fees in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 when compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014.

~~Changes in the geographic mix~~As a significant proportion of our AUM is based outside of the U.S., changes in foreign exchange rates result in a change to the mix of U.S. Dollar denominated AUM with AUM denominated in other currencies. As fee rates differ across geographic locations, changes to exchange rates have ~~also factored into~~an impact on the ~~improved~~net revenue ~~yield. Sales have been~~yields. The strengthening on the U.S. Dollar during the three months ended March 31, 2015 when compared to the three months ended March 31, 2014 resulted in a reduction in the net revenue yield before performance fees as it reduced the weighting of higher fee earning AUM attributable to the U.K. and Continental European products. This reduction was partly offset by the strong AUM sales in our Continental European business during recent quarters. As of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, the AUM attributable to clients domiciled in Continental Europe accounts for ~~8.8%~~9.3% of total AUM compared to ~~6.6%~~8.1% as of ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014. ~~On average, the AUM in Continental Europe earn a higher fee rate than the company's average fee rate for existing total AUM.~~

The tables that follow analyze AUM into active and passive ~~style.~~styles. Passive AUM generally earn a lower effective fee rate than active asset classes. At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, passive AUM were ~~$145.8~~$143.0 billion, representing ~~18.2%~~17.9% of total AUM at that date; whereas at ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014, passive AUM were ~~$123.7~~$142.9 billion, representing ~~17.5%~~18.2% of our total AUM at that date. In the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, the net revenue yield on passive AUM was ~~13.2~~13.3 basis points compared to ~~11.6~~12.7 basis points in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~,March 31, 2014, an increase of ~~1.6~~0.6 basis points, due to changes in mix of passive ~~AUM including sales of the PowerShares ETFs. The increase in the average yield from passive AUM in the three months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~when compared to the three months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ ~~has offset any reduction in total net revenue yield normally associated with the higher level of passive AUM as a percentage of total~~ AUM.

The increase in passive AUM includes the movements in the Powershares QQQ Nasdaq-100 index tracking fund. The Powershares QQQ fund AUM ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$44.0~~$38.9 billion at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to ~~$34.0~~$44.2 billion at ~~June 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. The revenue yield for Invesco on this product is less than 1 basis point, reimbursing Invesco for the portfolio trading services provided to the fund, and flows into and out of this product therefore have a significant impact on the overall net revenue yield and are a significant factor in the year-over-year yield changes.

Gross revenue yield on AUM ~~increased 2.3~~decreased 0.2 basis points to ~~65.7~~65.4 basis points in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 level of ~~63.4~~65.6 basis points. Management does not consider gross revenue yield, the most comparable U.S. GAAP-based measure to net revenue yield, to be a meaningful effective fee rate measure for the reasons outlined in footnote 1 to the Changes in AUM table above. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for a reconciliation of operating revenues (gross revenues) to net revenues.

4944

Table of Contents

Changes in our AUM by channel, asset class, and client domicile, and average AUM by asset class, are presented below:

Total AUM by Channel⁽¹⁾


$ in billions	Total		Retail		Institutional		Total		Retail		Institutional
March 31, 2014 AUM	787.3		534.6		252.7
December 31, 2014							792.4		532.5		259.9
Long-term inflows							50.5		40.3		10.2
Long-term outflows							(40.2	)	(32.8	)	(7.4	)
Long-term net flows							10.3		7.5		2.8
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund							(2.6	)	(2.6	)	—
Net flows in institutional money market funds							(6.0	)	—		(6.0	)
Total net flows							1.7		4.9		(3.2	)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment							14.4		11.1		3.3
Acquisitions/dispositions, net ⁽⁶⁾							(0.7	)	(0.7	)	—
Foreign currency translation							(9.5	)	(7.1	)	(2.4	)
March 31, 2015							798.3		540.7		257.6

December 31, 2013							778.7		519.6		259.1
Long-term inflows	42.5		36.3		6.2		50.2		39.6		10.6
Long-term outflows	(49.4	)	(44.5	)	(4.9	)	(43.7	)	(32.0	)	(11.7	)
Long-term net flows	(6.9	)	(8.2	)	1.3		6.5		7.6		(1.1	)
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	(3.0	)	(3.0	)	—		(1.3	)	(1.3	)	—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	1.1		—		1.1		(6.1	)	—		(6.1	)
Total net flows	(8.8	)	(11.2	)	2.4		(0.9	)	6.3		(7.2	)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	19.9		17.7		2.2		9.4		8.8		0.6
Foreign currency translation	4.0		3.7		0.3		0.1		(0.1	)	0.2
June 30, 2014 AUM	802.4		544.8		257.6

March 31, 2013 AUM	707.7		454.9		252.8
Long-term inflows	44.4		37.7		6.7
Long-term outflows	(43.0	)	(32.8	)	(10.2	)
Long-term net flows	1.4		4.9		(3.5	)
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	0.7		0.7		—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	(0.7	)	—		(0.7	)
Total net flows	1.4		5.6		(4.2	)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	(1.3	)	(1.6	)	0.3
Foreign currency translation	(2.2	)	(1.2	)	(1.0	)
June 30, 2013 AUM	705.6		457.7		247.9
March 31, 2014							787.3		534.6		252.7

____________

See accompanying notes immediately following these AUM tables.

5045

Table of Contents

Passive AUM by Channel⁽¹⁾


$ in billions	Total		Retail		Institutional		Total		Retail		Institutional
March 31, 2014 AUM	142.9		121.5		21.4
December 31, 2014							141.4		119.7		21.7
Long-term inflows							9.9		8.9		1.0
Long-term outflows							(6.4	)	(5.8	)	(0.6	)
Long-term net flows							3.5		3.1		0.4
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund							(2.6	)	(2.6	)	—
Net flows in institutional money market funds							—		—		—
Total net flows							0.9		0.5		0.4
Market gains and losses/reinvestment							1.4		1.3		0.1
Acquisitions/dispositions, net ⁽⁶⁾							(0.7	)	(0.7	)	—
Foreign currency translation							—		—		—
March 31, 2015							143.0		120.8		22.2

December 31, 2013							139.7		118.2		21.5
Long-term inflows	6.4		5.6		0.8		8.6		7.9		0.7
Long-term outflows	(5.3	)	(5.0	)	(0.3	)	(5.3	)	(4.5	)	(0.8	)
Long-term net flows	1.1		0.6		0.5		3.3		3.4		(0.1	)
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	(3.0	)	(3.0	)	—		(1.3	)	(1.3	)	—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total net flows	(1.9	)	(2.4	)	0.5		2.0		2.1		(0.1	)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	4.8		4.8		—		1.2		1.2		—
Foreign currency translation	—		—		—		—		—		—
June 30, 2014 AUM	145.8		123.9		21.9

March 31, 2013 AUM	123.1		98.5		24.6
Long-term inflows	11.8		10.1		1.7
Long-term outflows	(10.5	)	(8.2	)	(2.3	)
Long-term net flows	1.3		1.9		(0.6	)
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	0.7		0.7		—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	—		—		—
Total net flows	2.0		2.6		(0.6	)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	(1.0	)	(1.1	)	0.1
Foreign currency translation	(0.4	)	—		(0.4	)
June 30, 2013 AUM	123.7		100.0		23.7
March 31, 2014							142.9		121.5		21.4

____________

See accompanying notes immediately following these AUM tables.

5146

Table of Contents

Total AUM by Asset Class⁽²⁾


$ in billions	Total		Equity		Fixed Income		Balanced		Money Market			Alternatives⁽³⁾		Total		Equity		Fixed Income		Balanced		Money Market			Alternatives⁽³⁾
March 31, 2014 AUM	787.3		388.0		177.0		54.6		76.1			91.6
December 31, 2014														792.4		384.4		181.6		50.6		76.5			99.3
Long-term inflows														50.5		24.5		10.8		4.1		0.7			10.4
Long-term outflows														(40.2	)	(21.5	)	(7.2	)	(3.2	)	(0.9	)		(7.4	)
Long-term net flows														10.3		3.0		3.6		0.9		(0.2	)		3.0
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund														(2.6	)	(2.6	)	—		—		—			—
Net flows in institutional money market funds														(6.0	)	—		—		—		(6.0	)		—
Total net flows														1.7		0.4		3.6		0.9		(6.2	)		3.0
Market gains and losses/reinvestment														14.4		13.6		0.4		0.7		(0.1	)		(0.2	)
Acquisitions/dispositions, net ⁽⁶⁾														(0.7	)	—		—		—		—			(0.7	)
Foreign currency translation														(9.5	)	(5.6	)	(1.2	)	(1.6	)	—			(1.1	)
March 31, 2015														798.3		392.8		184.4		50.6		70.2		⁽⁴⁾	100.3
Average AUM														795.4		388.1		182.9		49.7		75.1			99.6
% of total average AUM														100.0	%	48.8	%	23.0	%	6.2	%	9.4	%		12.5	%

December 31, 2013														778.7		383.1		171.7		53.3		82.7			87.9
Long-term inflows	42.5		21.4		8.4		4.3		0.6			7.8		50.2		27.4		9.6		5.0		0.8			7.4
Long-term outflows	(49.4	)	(29.3	)	(6.2	)	(8.4	)	(0.7	)		(4.8	)	(43.7	)	(26.2	)	(6.7	)	(4.4	)	(1.0	)		(5.4	)
Long-term net flows	(6.9	)	(7.9	)	2.2		(4.1	)	(0.1	)		3.0		6.5		1.2		2.9		0.6		(0.2	)		2.0
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	(3.0	)	(3.0	)	—		—		—			—		(1.3	)	(1.3	)	—		—		—			—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	1.1		—		—		—		1.1			—		(6.1	)	—		—		—		(6.1	)		—
Total net flows	(8.8	)	(10.9	)	2.2		(4.1	)	1.0			3.0		(0.9	)	(0.1	)	2.9		0.6		(6.3	)		2.0
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	19.9		14.4		2.1		1.5		—			1.9		9.4		5.0		2.3		0.8		(0.3	)		1.6
Foreign currency translation	4.0		2.7		0.6		0.6		—			0.1		0.1		—		0.1		(0.1	)	—			0.1
June 30, 2014 AUM	802.4		394.2		181.9		52.6		77.1		⁽⁴⁾	96.6
March 31, 2014														787.3		388.0		177.0		54.6		76.1			91.6
Average AUM	790.1		385.9		179.7		52.2		77.3			95.0		779.6		383.2		174.5		53.6		79.0			89.3
% of total average AUM	100.0	%	48.8	%	22.7	%	6.6	%	9.8	%		12.0	%	100.0	%	49.2	%	22.4	%	6.9	%	10.1	%		11.5	%

March 31, 2013 AUM	707.7		319.1		175.9		49.3		77.8			85.6
Long-term inflows	44.4		21.0		9.6		5.6		1.2			7.0
Long-term outflows	(43.0	)	(22.4	)	(9.5	)	(3.5	)	(0.7	)		(6.9	)
Long-term net flows	1.4		(1.4	)	0.1		2.1		0.5			0.1
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	0.7		0.7		—		—		—			—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	(0.7	)	—		—		—		(0.7	)		—
Total net flows	1.4		(0.7	)	0.1		2.1		(0.2	)		0.1
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	(1.3	)	4.3		(2.7	)	(1.5	)	0.2			(1.6	)
Foreign currency translation	(2.2	)	(1.3	)	(0.2	)	(0.2	)	—			(0.5	)
June 30, 2013 AUM	705.6		321.4		173.1		49.7		77.8			83.6
Average AUM	719.8		324.4		177.4		51.3		81.3			85.4
% of total average AUM	100.0	%	45.1	%	24.6	%	7.1	%	11.3	%		11.9	%

____________

See accompanying notes immediately following these AUM tables.

5247

Table of Contents

Passive AUM by Asset Class⁽²⁾


$ in billions	Total		Equity		Fixed Income		Balanced		Money Market		Alternatives⁽³⁾		Total		Equity		Fixed Income		Balanced		Money Market		Alternatives⁽³⁾
March 31, 2014 AUM	142.9		87.0		40.9		—		—		15.0
December 31, 2014													141.4		88.2		41.1		—		—		12.1
Long-term inflows													9.9		6.5		2.0		—		—		1.4
Long-term outflows													(6.4	)	(3.5	)	(1.2	)	—		—		(1.7	)
Long-term net flows													3.5		3.0		0.8		—		—		(0.3	)
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund													(2.6	)	(2.6	)	—		—		—		—
Net flows in institutional money market funds													—		—		—		—		—		—
Total net flows													0.9		0.4		0.8		—		—		(0.3	)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment													1.4		1.4		0.1		—		—		(0.1	)
Acquisitions/dispositions, net ⁽⁶⁾													(0.7	)	—		—		—		—		(0.7	)
Foreign currency translation													—		—		—		—		—		—
March 31, 2015													143.0		90.0		42.0		—		—		11.0
Average AUM													142.7		89.0		42.1		—		—		11.6
% of total average AUM													100.0	%	62.4	%	29.5	%	—	%	—	%	8.1	%

December 31, 2013													139.7		85.6		39.5		—		—		14.6
Long-term inflows	6.4		4.3		1.4		—		—		0.7		8.6		5.4		2.2		—		—		1.0
Long-term outflows	(5.3	)	(3.6	)	(0.6	)	��		—		(1.1	)	(5.3	)	(3.2	)	(1.2	)	—		—		(0.9	)
Long-term net flows	1.1		0.7		0.8		—		—		(0.4	)	3.3		2.2		1.0		—		—		0.1
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	(3.0	)	(3.0	)	—		—		—		—		(1.3	)	(1.3	)	—		—		—		—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total net flows	(1.9	)	(2.3	)	0.8		—		—		(0.4	)	2.0		0.9		1.0		—		—		0.1
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	4.8		4.3		0.3		—		—		0.2		1.2		0.5		0.4		—		—		0.3
Foreign currency translation	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
June 30, 2014 AUM	145.8		89.0		42.0		—		—		14.8
March 31, 2014													142.9		87.0		40.9		—		—		15.0
Average AUM	141.9		85.4		41.6		—		—		14.9		140.6		86.4		40.2		—		—		14.0
% of total average AUM	100.0	%	60.2	%	29.3	%	—	%	—	%	10.5	%	100.0	%	61.5	%	28.6	%	—	%	—	%	10.0	%

March 31, 2013 AUM	123.1		62.0		41.9		—		—		19.2
Long-term inflows	11.8		6.8		4.0		—		—		1.0
Long-term outflows	(10.5	)	(4.8	)	(2.2	)	—		—		(3.5	)
Long-term net flows	1.3		2.0		1.8		—		—		(2.5	)
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	0.7		0.7		—		—		—		—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	—		—		—		—		—		—
Total net flows	2.0		2.7		1.8		—		—		(2.5	)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	(1.0	)	1.0		(1.2	)	—		—		(0.8	)
Foreign currency translation	(0.4	)	—		—		—		—		(0.4	)
June 30, 2013 AUM	123.7		65.7		42.5		—		—		15.5
Average AUM	125.9		65.5		43.7		—		—		16.7
% of total average AUM	100.0	%	52.0	%	34.7	%	—	%	—	%	13.3	%

____________

See accompanying notes immediately following these AUM tables.

5348

Table of Contents

Total AUM by Client Domicile⁽⁵⁾


$ in billions	Total		U.S.		Canada		U.K.		Continental Europe		Asia		Total		U.S.		Canada		U.K.		Continental Europe		Asia
March 31, 2014 AUM	787.3		526.1		27.1		115.9		63.4		54.8
December 31, 2014													792.4		532.1		25.8		105.1		71.1		58.3
Long-term inflows													50.5		26.1		1.0		4.9		12.2		6.3
Long-term outflows													(40.2	)	(22.0	)	(1.0	)	(4.3	)	(7.2	)	(5.7	)
Long-term net flows													10.3		4.1		—		0.6		5.0		0.6
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund													(2.6	)	(2.6	)	—		—		—		—
Net flows in institutional money market funds													(6.0	)	(5.6	)	(0.1	)	(0.1	)	—		(0.2	)
Total net flows													1.7		(4.1	)	(0.1	)	0.5		5.0		0.4
Market gains and losses/reinvestment													14.4		5.3		1.5		5.5		0.2		1.9
Acquisitions/dispositions, net ⁽⁶⁾													(0.7	)	(0.7	)	—		—		—		—
Foreign currency translation													(9.5	)	—		(2.3	)	(4.8	)	(2.1	)	(0.3	)
March 31, 2015													798.3		532.6		24.9		106.3		74.2		60.3

December 31, 2013													778.7		521.3		27.1		114.8		60.9		54.6
Long-term inflows	42.5		19.7		0.9		6.1		10.4		5.4		50.2		24.7		1.1		5.1		11.3		8.0
Long-term outflows	(49.4	)	(19.5	)	(1.1	)	(19.9	)	(5.3	)	(3.6	)	(43.7	)	(21.1	)	(1.2	)	(6.9	)	(6.5	)	(8.0	)
Long-term net flows	(6.9	)	0.2		(0.2	)	(13.8	)	5.1		1.8		6.5		3.6		(0.1	)	(1.8	)	4.8		—
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	(3.0	)	(3.0	)	—		—		—		—		(1.3	)	(1.3	)	—		—		—		—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	1.1		(0.7	)	0.1		1.5		0.1		0.1		(6.1	)	(3.4	)	(0.1	)	0.5		(3.1	)	—
Total net flows	(8.8	)	(3.5	)	(0.1	)	(12.3	)	5.2		1.9		(0.9	)	(1.1	)	(0.2	)	(1.3	)	1.7		—
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	19.9		14.9		0.7		1.3		1.8		1.2		9.4		5.9		1.2		1.6		0.8		(0.1	)
Foreign currency translation	4.0		—		1.0		2.7		—		0.3		0.1		—		(1.0	)	0.8		—		0.3
June 30, 2014 AUM	802.4		537.5		28.7		107.6		70.4		58.2

March 31, 2013 AUM	707.7		482.4		26.0		104.6		44.3		50.4
Long-term inflows	44.4		25.6		0.9		4.4		7.5		6.0
Long-term outflows	(43.0	)	(25.9	)	(1.3	)	(5.0	)	(5.0	)	(5.8	)
Long-term net flows	1.4		(0.3	)	(0.4	)	(0.6	)	2.5		0.2
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	0.7		0.7		—		—		—		—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	(0.7	)	(0.4	)	—		0.1		(0.1	)	(0.3	)
Total net flows	1.4		—		(0.4	)	(0.5	)	2.4		(0.1	)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	(1.3	)	(0.9	)	0.1		0.3		(0.4	)	(0.4	)
Foreign currency translation	(2.2	)	—		(0.9	)	(0.1	)	0.1		(1.3	)
June 30, 2013 AUM	705.6		481.5		24.8		104.3		46.4		48.6
March 31, 2014													787.3		526.1		27.1		115.9		63.4		54.8

____________

See accompanying notes immediately following these AUM tables.

5449

Table of Contents

Passive AUM by Client Domicile⁽⁵⁾


$ in billions	Total		U.S.		Canada	U.K.	Continental Europe		Asia		Total		U.S.		Canada	U.K.	Continental Europe		Asia
March 31, 2014 AUM	142.9		138.5		0.1	—	1.8		2.5
December 31, 2014											141.4		137.6		0.2	—	1.8		1.8
Long-term inflows	6.4		6.3		—	—	0.1		—		9.9		9.6		—	—	0.2		0.1
Long-term outflows	(5.3	)	(4.8	)	—	—	(0.2	)	(0.3	)	(6.4	)	(6.1	)	—	—	(0.2	)	(0.1	)
Long-term net flows	1.1		1.5		—	—	(0.1	)	(0.3	)	3.5		3.5		—	—	—		—
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	(3.0	)	(3.0	)	—	—	—		—		(2.6	)	(2.6	)	—	—	—		—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	—		—		—	—	—		—		—		—		—	—	—		—
Total net flows	(1.9	)	(1.5	)	—	—	(0.1	)	(0.3	)	0.9		0.9		—	—	—		—
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	4.8		4.7		—	—	0.1		—		1.4		1.2		0.1	—	—		0.1
Acquisitions/dispositions, net ⁽⁶⁾											(0.7	)	(0.7	)	—	—	—		—
Foreign currency translation	—		—		—	—	—		—		—		—		—	—	—		—
June 30, 2014 AUM	145.8		141.7		0.1	—	1.8		2.2
March 31, 2015											143.0		139.0		0.3	—	1.8		1.9

March 31, 2013 AUM	123.1		116.9		0.1	—	1.2		4.9
December 31, 2013											139.7		135.2		0.1	—	1.8		2.6
Long-term inflows	11.8		11.5		—	—	0.2		0.1		8.6		8.5		—	—	0.1		—
Long-term outflows	(10.5	)	(8.3	)	—	—	(0.1	)	(2.1	)	(5.3	)	(5.1	)	—	—	(0.1	)	(0.1	)
Long-term net flows	1.3		3.2		—	—	0.1		(2.0	)	3.3		3.4		—	—	—		(0.1	)
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund	0.7		0.7		—	—	—		—		(1.3	)	(1.3	)	—	—	—		—
Net flows in institutional money market funds	—		—		—	—	—		—
Total net flows	2.0		3.9		—	—	0.1		(2.0	)	2.0		2.1		—	—	—		(0.1	)
Market gains and losses/reinvestment	(1.0	)	(1.1	)	—	—	—		0.1		1.2		1.2		—	—	—		—
Foreign currency translation	(0.4	)	—		—	—	—		(0.4	)	—		—		—	—	—		—
June 30, 2013 AUM	123.7		119.7		0.1	—	1.3		2.6
March 31, 2014											142.9		138.5		0.1	—	1.8		2.5


(1)	Channel refers to the internal distribution channel from which the AUM originated. Retail AUM represents AUM distributed by the company's retail sales team. Institutional AUM represents AUM distributed by our institutional sales team. This aggregation is viewed as a proxy for presenting AUM in the retail and institutional markets in which the company operates.


(2)	Asset classes are descriptive groupings of AUM by common type of underlying investments.


(3)	There have been no significant changes to the managed objectives under the Alternatives asset class, which are disclosed in our most recent Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014.


(4)	Ending Money Market AUM includes ~~$73.1~~$66.3 billion in institutional money market AUM and ~~$4.0~~$3.9 billion in retail money market AUM.


(5)	Client domicile disclosure groups AUM by the domicile of the underlying clients.

(6) Dispositions during the first quarter 2015 resulted in a $0.7 billion decrease in AUM representing exchange traded notes that did not transfer over as part of the agreement with Deutsche Bank to transition the investment management of the PowerShares DB suite of commodity exchange traded funds to Invesco.

Results of Operations for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014

To assist in the comparisons, the discussion that follows will separate the impact of CIP from the overall consolidated results of operations. The impact is illustrated in the tables immediately below by a column which shows the dollar-value change in the consolidated figures, as caused by the consolidation of CIP. For example, the impact of CIP on total operating revenues for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 was a reduction of ~~$8.6~~$9.3 million. This indicates that the consolidation of CIP reduced consolidated revenues by ~~$8.6~~$9.3 million, primarily reflecting the elimination upon consolidation of the revenues earned by Invesco for managing these investment products. The discussion below includes the use of non-GAAP financial measures. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional details and reconciliations of the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures to the non-GAAP measures.

5550

Table of Contents

Summary of Income Statement Impact of CIP


	Three months ended June 30,								Three months ended March 31,
	2014				2013				2015				2014
$ in millions	Impact of CIP		Invesco Ltd. Consolidated		Impact of CIP		Invesco Ltd. Consolidated		Impact of CIP		Invesco Ltd. Consolidated		Impact of CIP		Invesco Ltd. Consolidated
Total operating revenues	(8.6	)	1,289.9		(9.0	)	1,135.5		(9.3	)	1,291.6		(8.4	)	1,269.5
Total operating expenses	1.7		935.1		9.3		861.6		12.2		953.5		12.6		1,025.2
Operating income	(10.3	)	354.8		(18.3	)	273.9		(21.5	)	338.1		(21.0	)	244.3
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	(2.2	)	5.5		(0.8	)	6.9		(1.7	)	11.8		(1.2	)	10.0
Interest and dividend income	(0.6	)	3.1		(1.8	)	2.1		(1.4	)	2.5		(0.9	)	2.9
Interest expense	—		(18.2	)	—		(10.0	)	—		(18.7	)	—		(18.7	)
Other gains and losses, net	(4.7	)	16.2		—		0.4		(2.7	)	2.7		—		6.6
Other income/(loss) of CSIP, net	—		7.7		—		—
Other income/(expense) of CSIP, net									—		9.4		—		8.2
Interest and dividend income of CIP	48.0		48.0		50.7		50.7		60.2		60.2		48.3		48.3
Interest expense of CIP	(30.3	)	(30.3	)	(30.6	)	(30.6	)	(45.1	)	(45.1	)	(30.3	)	(30.3	)
Other gains/(losses) of CIP, net	36.8		36.8		(1.6	)	(1.6	)	24.4		24.4		26.5		26.5
Income from continuing operations before taxes	36.7		423.6		(2.4	)	291.8		12.2		385.3		21.4		297.8
Income tax provision	—		(107.0	)	—		(83.5	)	—		(101.3	)	—		(89.0	)
Income from continuing operations, net of taxes	36.7		316.6		(2.4	)	208.3		12.2		284.0		21.4		208.8
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes	—		0.2		—		(4.6	)	—		—		—		(2.0	)
Net income	36.7		316.8		(2.4	)	203.7		12.2		284.0		21.4		206.8
Net (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	(38.7	)	(42.3	)	(1.1	)	(1.1	)	(20.4	)	(24.4	)	(16.1	)	(19.0	)
Net income attributable to common shareholders	(2.0	)	274.5		(3.5	)	202.6
Net income attributable to Invesco Ltd.									(8.2	)	259.6		5.3		187.8

Operating Revenues and Net Revenues

The main categories of revenues, and the dollar and percentage change between the periods, are as follows:


					Variance								Variance
	Three months ended June 30,				2014 vs 2013				Three months ended March 31,				2015 vs 2014
$ in millions	2014		2013		$ Change		% Change		2015		2014		$ Change		% Change
Investment management fees	1,031.9		885.5		146.4		16.5	%	1,001.4		965.4		36.0		3.7	%
Service and distribution fees	214.7		215.7		(1.0	)	(0.5	)%	213.4		238.6		(25.2	)	(10.6	)%
Performance fees	5.0		6.0		(1.0	)	(16.7	)%	46.8		31.1		15.7		50.5	%
Other	38.3		28.3		10.0		35.3	%	30.0		34.4		(4.4	)	(12.8	)%
Total operating revenues	1,289.9		1,135.5		154.4		13.6	%	1,291.6		1,269.5		22.1		1.7	%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses	(410.6	)	(366.0	)	(44.6	)	12.2	%	(399.1	)	(405.4	)	6.3		(1.6	)%
Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments	13.1		11.8		1.3		11.0	%	15.7		15.3		0.4		2.6	%
CIP	8.6		9.0		(0.4	)	(4.4	)%	9.3		8.4		0.9		10.7	%
Net revenues	901.0		790.3		110.7		14.0	%	917.5		887.8		29.7		3.3	%

Operating revenues increased by ~~13.6%~~1.7% in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 to ~~$1,289.9~~$1,291.6 million (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $1,135.5~~March 31, 2014: $1,269.5 million). Net revenues increased by ~~14.0%~~3.3% in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 to ~~$901.0~~$917.5 million (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $790.3~~March 31, 2014: $887.8 million). Net revenues are operating revenues less third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses, plus our proportional share of net revenues from joint venture arrangements, plus management and performance fees earned from, less other revenues recorded by, ~~CIP, plus other reconciling items.~~CIP. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional important disclosures regarding the use of net revenues.

5651

Table of Contents

revenues and expenses from period to period. The income statements of foreign currency subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars, the reporting currency of the company, using average foreign exchange rates. The impact of foreign exchange rate movements ~~increased~~decreased operating revenues by ~~$26.4~~$59.5 million, equivalent to ~~2.0%~~4.6% of total operating revenues, during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 when compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014. Additionally, our revenues are directly influenced by the level and composition of our AUM. Therefore, movements in global capital market levels, net new business inflows (or outflows) and changes in the mix of investment products between asset classes and geographies may materially affect our revenues from period to period. As discussed in the Executive Overview, returns from capital markets were positive in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~.March 31, 2015.

Investment Management Fees

Investment management fees increased by ~~$146.4~~$36.0 million ~~(16.5%~~(3.7%) in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~,March 31, 2015, to ~~$1,031.9~~$1,001.4 million (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $885.5~~March 31, 2014: $965.4 million). In April 2014, our UK Invesco Perpetual business introduced a single Fund Management Fee (FMF) for their retail funds to replace the separate annual management fee and registration fee. This resulted in an increase in investment management fees ~~of $29.6 million~~ and a corresponding reduction in service and distribution fees during the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. The UK business recorded $29.6 million of registration fees in three months ended March 31, 2014,. the equivalent of which is included in investment management fees in the current period. After adjusting for the introduction of the single FMF, the increase is equivalent to ~~13.2%~~$6.4 million or less than 1%. This compares to a ~~9.8%~~2.0% increase in average AUM and a ~~10.8%~~3.8% increase in average long-term AUM. As discussed above, the net revenue yield before performance fees is ~~higher~~lower in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 when compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014, reflecting the ~~change~~impact of changes in foreign exchange rates on the AUM ~~weighting to higher fee-earning asset classes.~~product mix. See the company's disclosures regarding the changes in AUM and revenue yields during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 in the “Assets Under Management” section above for additional information regarding the movements in AUM. The impact of foreign exchange rate movements ~~increased~~decreased investment management fees by ~~$26.4~~$56.8 million during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014.

Service and Distribution Fees

In the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, service and distribution fees decreased by ~~$1.0~~$25.2 million ~~(0.5%~~(10.6%) to ~~$214.7~~$213.4 million (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $215.7~~March 31, 2014: $238.6 million). The decrease is ~~primarily~~ driven by the introduction of a single FMF for several UK funds as noted ~~above. The decrease is partially offset by~~above, which reduced service and distribution fees in 2015 as compared to 2014. In this respect, the ~~increases~~UK business recorded $29.6 million of registration fees in ~~average AUM and revenue yields, as well as a new recurring asset-based service fee that began~~the three months ended March 31, 2014. In subsequent periods, the equivalent amounts are included in ~~2014.~~investment management fees. The impact of foreign exchange rate movements decreased service and distribution fees by ~~$0.5~~$0.9 million during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014.

Performance Fees

Of our ~~$802.4~~$798.3 billion in AUM at ~~June 30, 2014~~,March 31, 2015, approximately ~~$49.2~~$47.3 billion or ~~6.1%~~5.9%, could potentially earn performance ~~fees.~~fees, including carried interests and performance fees related to partnership investments and separate accounts.

In the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, performance fees ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$1.0~~$15.7 million ~~(16.7%~~(50.5%) to ~~$5.0~~$46.8 million when compared to the performance fees in three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 of ~~$6.0~~$31.1 million. Performance fees earned during the three months ended March 31, 2015 included $35.3 million generated from real estate and $10.1 million generated by the U.K. investment teams. Performance fees earned during the three months ended March 31, 2014 included $27.6 million generated by the U.K. investment teams and $2.3 million attributable to the Global Quantitative Equity team. The impact of foreign exchange rate movements ~~increased~~decreased performance fees by ~~$0.3~~$1.3 million during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014.

Other Revenues

In the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, other revenues ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$10.0~~$4.4 million ~~(35.3%~~(12.8%) to ~~$38.3~~$30.0 million (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~$28.3~~$34.4 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements ~~increased~~decreased other revenues ~~$0.2~~by $0.5 million during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. After allowing for foreign exchange rate changes, the ~~increase~~decrease in other revenues was ~~$9.8~~$3.9 million. The ~~increase~~decrease in other revenues during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 includes ~~increases~~decreases in mutual fund front end fees of $4.3 million, UIT revenues of $0.2 million, real estate acquisition and disposition fees of ~~$6.9~~$0.3 million ~~mutual fund~~and other revenue of $0.9 million. These decreases were partially offset by an increase in UIT front end fees of ~~$0.8 million, UIT revenues~~$1.8 million.

Table of $0.7 million, and other revenues of $1.4 million. The increase in real estate acquisition and disposition fees primarily relates to a real estate acquisition fee from the launch of a new real estate investment trust recognized in the second quarter of 2014.Contents

Third-Party Distribution, Service and Advisory Expenses

Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$44.6~~$6.3 million ~~(12.2%~~(1.6%) in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 to ~~$410.6~~$399.1 million (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $366.0~~March 31, 2014: $405.4 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements ~~increased~~decreased third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses by ~~$9.0~~$14.3 million during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. After allowing for foreign exchange rate changes, the increase in third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses was ~~$35.6~~$8.0 million, which includes increases in trail and renewal

~~Table of Contents~~

commissions of ~~$18.6~~$11.2 million ~~distribution~~and service fees of ~~$13.1~~$2.9 million, ~~external commissions of $1.6 million and transfer agent fees of $3.1 million, which were~~ partially offset by ~~a decrease~~decreases in ~~sub advisory~~transaction fee expenses of $4.4 million related to front-end load commissions and other fees of ~~$0.8~~$1.7 million. The ~~overall~~ increase in third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses is ~~reflective of~~in line with the ~~higher~~changes in related retail ~~management fees and front-end load fees (recorded in other revenues).~~AUM.

Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments

Management believes that the addition of our proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture arrangements should be added to operating revenues to arrive at net revenues, as it is important to evaluate the contribution to the business that our joint venture arrangements are making. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional disclosures regarding the use of net revenues. The company's most significant joint venture arrangement is our 49% investment in Invesco Great Wall Fund Management Company Limited (the “Invesco Great Wall” joint venture).

Our proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments increased by ~~$1.3~~$0.4 million ~~(11.0%~~(2.6%) to ~~$13.1~~$15.7 million for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~$11.8~~$15.3 million). ~~The increase moved in line with our~~Our share of the Invesco Great Wall joint venture's average AUM for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015~~, which~~ was ~~$4.7~~$5.0 billion compared to ~~$3.6~~$5.1 billion for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014.

Management, performance and other fees earned from CIP

Management believes that the consolidation of investment products may impact a reader's analysis of our underlying results of operations and could result in investor confusion or the production of information about the company by analysts or external credit rating agencies that is not reflective of the underlying results of operations and financial condition of the company. Accordingly, management believes that it is appropriate to adjust operating revenues for the impact of CIP in calculating net revenues. As management and performance fees earned by Invesco from the consolidated products are eliminated upon consolidation of the investment products, management believes that it is appropriate to add these operating revenues back in the calculation of net revenues. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional disclosures regarding the use of net revenues.

The elimination of management and performance fees earned from CIP was ~~$8.7~~$9.3 million in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $9.4~~March 31, 2014: $8.4 million), while other revenues from CIP were ~~$0.1 million~~zero (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~$0.4 million)~~none). The increase is primarily due to the impact of newly consolidated funds partially offset by the impact of note paydowns and funds deconsolidated after March 31, 2014.

Operating Expenses

The main categories of operating expenses, and the dollar and percentage changes between periods, are as follows:


			Variance						Variance
	Three months ended June 30,		2014 vs 2013				Three months ended March 31,		2015 vs 2014
$ in millions	2014	2013	$ Change		% Change		2015	2014	$ Change		% Change
Employee compensation	342.9	324.1	18.8		5.8	%	360.9	362.1	(1.2	)	(0.3	)%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory	410.6	366.0	44.6		12.2	%	399.1	405.4	(6.3	)	(1.6	)%
Marketing	30.2	23.8	6.4		26.9	%	26.7	23.4	3.3		14.1	%
Property, office and technology	75.3	68.6	6.7		9.8	%	76.9	112.7	(35.8	)	(31.8	)%
General and administrative	76.1	77.3	(1.2	)	(1.6	)%	89.9	121.6	(31.7	)	(26.1	)%
Transaction and integration	—	1.8	(1.8	)	(100.0	)%
Total operating expenses	935.1	861.6	73.5		8.5	%	953.5	1,025.2	(71.7	)	(7.0	)%

5853

Table of Contents

The table below sets forth these expense categories as a percentage of total operating expenses and operating revenues, which we believe provides useful information as to the relative significance of each type of expense.


$ in millions	June 30, 2014	% of Total Operating Expenses		% of Operating Revenues		June 30, 2013	% of Total Operating Expenses		% of Operating Revenues		Three months ended March 31, 2015	% of Total Operating Expenses		% of Operating Revenues		Three months ended March 31, 2014	% of Total Operating Expenses		% of Operating Revenues
Employee compensation	342.9	36.7	%	26.6	%	324.1	37.6	%	28.6	%	360.9	37.9	%	27.9	%	362.1	35.3	%	28.5	%
Third-party distribution, service and advisory	410.6	43.9	%	31.8	%	366.0	42.5	%	32.2	%	399.1	41.9	%	30.9	%	405.4	39.5	%	31.9	%
Marketing	30.2	3.2	%	2.3	%	23.8	2.7	%	2.1	%	26.7	2.8	%	2.1	%	23.4	2.3	%	1.8	%
Property, office and technology	75.3	8.1	%	5.8	%	68.6	8.0	%	6.0	%	76.9	8.1	%	6.0	%	112.7	11.0	%	8.9	%
General and administrative	76.1	8.1	%	5.9	%	77.3	9.0	%	6.8	%	89.9	9.4	%	7.0	%	121.6	11.9	%	9.6	%
Transaction and integration	—	—	%	—	%	1.8	0.2	%	0.2	%
Total operating expenses	935.1	100.0	%	72.5	%	861.6	100.0	%	75.9	%	953.5	100.0	%	73.8	%	1,025.2	100.0	%	80.7	%

During the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~,March 31, 2015, operating expenses ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$73.5~~$71.7 million ~~(8.5%~~(7.0%) to ~~$935.1~~$953.5 million (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $861.6~~March 31, 2014: $1,025.2 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements ~~increased~~decreased operating expenses by ~~$18.3~~$37.1 million, or ~~2.0%~~3.9% of total operating expenses, during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014.

Employee Compensation

Employee compensation ~~increased $18.8~~decreased $1.2 million ~~(5.8%~~(0.3%) to ~~$342.9~~$360.9 million in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $324.1~~March 31, 2014: $362.1 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements ~~increased~~decreased employee compensation by ~~$5.1~~$15.2 million during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. After allowing for foreign exchange rate changes, the increase in employee compensation was ~~$13.7~~$14.0 million.

Direct compensation increased ~~$18.5~~$14.1 million primarily due to ~~improved company performance. The increase includes higher~~increases in base salaries and incentive compensation expenses of ~~$22.8~~$20.5 million and share-based compensation of $4.3 million. ~~The~~Improved company performance, increases in bonuses linked to higher performance fees, and increased headcount were the primary reasons for the increase in compensation. Annual salary increases are effective March 1 each year and also contribute the the year-on-year increase. Other employee compensation also included an increase in payroll taxes of $1.3 million. These increases were ~~partially~~partly offset by ~~a decrease~~decreases in ~~commissions~~severance and ~~other compensation~~relocation costs of ~~$4.3~~$7.4 million during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 when compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014.

Headcount at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 was ~~6,070 (at~~ ~~June 30, 2013, on a continuing operations basis: 5,818)~~6,360 (March 31, 2014: 6,005).

Third-Party Distribution, Service and Advisory Expenses

Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses are discussed above in the operating and net revenues section.

Marketing

Marketing expenses increased by ~~$6.4~~$3.3 million ~~(26.9%~~(14.1%) in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 to ~~$30.2~~$26.7 million (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~$23.8~~$23.4 million). ~~Excluding the~~The impact of foreign exchange rate movements ~~of $0.9 million, the increase in~~decreased marketing expenses ~~was $5.5~~by $1.4 million during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014. After allowing for foreign exchange rate changes, the increase in marketing expenses was $4.7 million. The increase during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 ~~reflects increased~~includes increases in advertising expenses of $3.9 million, client event expenses of $0.9 million, and sales literature and research of $0.7 million. The increases were partially offset by decreases in marketing travel of $0.6 million and other ~~client related~~ marketing ~~expenditure across EMEA and particularly in the U.K.~~costs of $0.2 million.

Property, Office and Technology

Property, office and technology costs ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$6.7~~$35.8 million ~~(9.8%~~(31.8%) to ~~$75.3~~$76.9 million in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $68.6~~March 31, 2014: $112.7 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements ~~increased~~decreased property, office and technology expenses by ~~$1.4~~$2.7 million during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. After allowing for foreign exchange rate movements, the ~~increase~~decrease was ~~$5.3~~$33.1 million.

Property and office costs are generally trending upwards, due to market conditions. However, the business optimization initiative undertaken in the first quarter of 2014 has mitigated the increases in the current period, and therefore property and office costs have remained flatexpenses decreased $36.9 million compared to the same period in ~~2013.~~2014, due primarily to a charge of $35.8 million associated with vacating leased properties in connection with a business optimization initiative undertaken during first quarter of 2014. Other decreases in property and office costs included depreciation expense on leasehold improvements of

Table of Contents

$1.3 million, property taxes and office expenses of $1.1 million. The decrease was partially offset by increases in rent expense of ~~$1.1~~$0.7 million ~~was offset by increases in~~and property management fees of ~~$0.8 million and other property costs of $0.3~~$0.6 million.

Technology and communications expenses increased ~~$5.3~~$3.8 million over the comparable ~~2013~~2014 period primarily due to increases in depreciation and maintenance of ~~$3.3~~$2.9 million and increased outsourced administration and other costs of ~~$2.0 million driven by continued increased Continental European sales activity.~~$0.9 million.

~~Table of Contents~~

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses decreased by ~~$1.2~~$31.7 million ~~(1.6%~~(26.1%) to ~~$76.1~~$89.9 million in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $77.3~~March 31, 2014: $121.6 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements ~~increased~~decreased general and administrative expenses by ~~$1.9~~$3.5 million during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. After allowing for foreign exchange rate movements, general and administrative costs decreased ~~$3.1~~$28.2 million compared to the same period in ~~2013.~~2014.

~~General~~The decrease in general and administrative expenses decreased $6.8 million related to lower fund launch costs of our consolidated investment products, $0.4 million of amortization of intangibles, and $0.5 million of other general and administrative expense infor the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~compared~~March 31, 2015 is primarily due to the ~~prior year.~~U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) penalty of $31.1 million and related legal costs of $0.5 million that were incurred in the first quarter 2014. Also included within general and administrative expenses for the first quarter 2014 was a charge of $5.3 million in respect of a multi-year fund reimbursement expense associated with historical private equity management fees. Other decreases include lower absorbed fund expenses of $2.6 million, regulatory fees of $1.2 million and other expenses of $0.9 million. These decreases were partially offset by increases in ~~mutual fund~~market data services of $4.1 million, higher consulting fees of $5.3 million, increased irrecoverable taxes of $2.2 million and increased travel expenses of ~~$3.1 million and VAT expenses of $1.5 million compared to the same period in 2013.~~

~~Transaction and integration~~

~~There were no transaction and integration charges in the three months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(three months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: $1.8 ~~million). Transaction and integration expenses during the three months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ ~~relate to fund mergers and include professional services and shareholder communications costs. These costs ceased in the first half of 2013.~~million.

Operating Income, Adjusted Operating Income, Operating Margin and Adjusted Operating Margin

Operating income increased by ~~$80.9~~$93.8 million ~~(29.5%~~(38.4%) to ~~$354.8~~$338.1 million in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $273.9~~March 31, 2014: $244.3 million). Operating margin (operating income divided by operating revenues), increased to ~~27.5%~~26.2% in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~24.1%~~19.2% in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. The increase in operating income and margin resulted from ~~a higher relative~~an increase in operating revenues ~~(13.6%~~(1.7%) ~~than~~combined with a decrease in operating expenses ~~(8.5%~~(7.0%) during the period. Adjusted operating income increased by ~~$66.4~~$11.4 million ~~(21.4%~~(3.1%) to ~~$377.0~~$374.4 million in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~$310.6~~$363.0 million in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. Adjusted operating margin ~~increased~~decreased to ~~41.8%~~40.8% in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 from ~~39.3%~~40.9% in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for a reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues, a reconciliation of operating income to adjusted operating income and additional important disclosures regarding net revenues, adjusted operating income and adjusted operating margin.

Other Income and Expenses

The main categories of other income and expenses, and the dollar and percentage changes between periods are as follows:


					Variance								Variance
	Three months ended June 30,				2014 vs 2013				Three months ended March 31,				2015 vs 2014
$ in millions	2014		2013		$ Change		% Change		2015		2014		$ Change		% Change
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	5.5		6.9		(1.4	)	(20.3	)%	11.8		10.0		1.8		18.0	%
Interest and dividend income	3.1		2.1		1.0		47.6	%	2.5		2.9		(0.4	)	(13.8	)%
Interest expense	(18.2	)	(10.0	)	(8.2	)	82.0	%	(18.7	)	(18.7	)	—		—	%
Other gains and losses, net	16.2		0.4		15.8		N/A		2.7		6.6		(3.9	)	(59.1	)%
Other income/(loss) of CSIP, net	7.7		—		7.7		N/A
Other income/(expense) of CSIP, net									9.4		8.2		1.2		14.6	%
Other income and expenses of CIP:
Interest and dividend income of CIP	48.0		50.7		(2.7	)	(5.3	)%	60.2		48.3		11.9		24.6	%
Interest expense of CIP	(30.3	)	(30.6	)	0.3		(1.0	)%	(45.1	)	(30.3	)	(14.8	)	48.8	%
Other gains/(losses) of CIP, net	36.8		(1.6	)	38.4		N/A		24.4		26.5		(2.1	)	(7.9	)%
Total other income and expenses	68.8		17.9		50.9		284.4	%	47.2		53.5		(6.3	)	(11.8	)%

Table of Contents

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates

Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$1.4~~$1.8 million ~~(20.3%~~(18.0%) to ~~$5.5~~$11.8 million in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $6.9~~March 31, 2014: $10.0 million). The ~~decrease~~increase is comprised of a $2.1 million reduction in our earnings of our investment in Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc., a $1.2 million net decrease in our private equity and certain other partnership investments, and a $0.6 million decrease in our joint venture investments in China. These decreases are partially offset by a $2.5$4.5 million increase in earnings from our real estate partnership ~~investments.~~

~~Table~~investments, an increase of ~~Contents~~$2.9 million from our investment in Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc and increases of $1.4 million from certain other joint ventures and affiliates. These increases are offset by a decrease in earnings from our private equity partnerships of $4.8 million and a decrease of $2.2 million in earnings from our joint venture investments in China.

Interest and dividend income and interest expense

Interest and dividend income ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$1.0~~$0.4 million ~~(47.6%~~(13.8%) to ~~$3.1~~$2.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2015 (three months ended March 31, 2014: $2.9 million).

Interest expense remained consistent at $18.7 million in the three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~$2.1~~$18.7 million).

~~Interest expense increased by $8.2 million (82.0%) to $18.2 million in the three months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(three months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013: $10.0 million) primarily due to the changes in long-term financing arrangements made during the fourth quarter of 2013 which increased the overall borrowing costs versus the comparative period.~~

Other gains and losses, net

Other gains and losses, net were a gain of ~~$16.2~~$2.7 million in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 as compared to a net gain of ~~$0.4~~$6.6 million in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.March 31, 2014. Included within other gains and losses, net in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 is a net realized ~~gains~~gain from available-for-sale and other investments of ~~$8.1~~$0.7 million (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $0.2~~March 31, 2014: $2.7 million net gain), a net gain of ~~$7.0~~$5.1 million resulting from the appreciation of investments held for our deferred compensation plans (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $0.5~~March 31, 2014: $3.9 million net gain)~~, and $0.8 million of unrealized gains from other trading investments (three months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013: none)~~. The three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2015 also included a net ~~loss~~gain of ~~$0.3~~$0.6 million related to the mark-to-market of foreign exchange put option contracts intended to provide protection against the impact of a significant decline in the Pound Sterling/U.S Dollar foreign exchange ~~rate.~~rate (March 31, 2014: zero). These gains are offset by a loss of $3.2 million on other trading investments (three months ended March 31, 2014: none) and $0.5 million in net foreign exchange losses (three months ended March 31, 2014: none).

Other income/~~(loss)~~(expense) of CSIP

In the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, other income/~~(loss)~~(expense) of CSIP, net totaled ~~$7.7~~income of $9.4 million ~~in income~~(three months ended March 31, 2014: $8.2 million) and consists of ~~$2.7~~$3.0 million of interest and dividend income and other ~~gains/(losses)~~net gains of ~~$5.0~~$6.4 million ~~on investment holdings. CSIP products were initially consolidated in the third quarter of 2013. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements - Notes~~ 1~~, "Accounting Policies"~~(three months ended March 31, 2014: $1.7 million and ~~12, “Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products,” for additional details.~~$6.5 million, respectively).

Non-operating income and expense of CIP

In the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, interest and dividend income of CIP ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$2.7~~$11.9 million ~~(5.3%~~(24.6%) to ~~$48.0~~$60.2 million (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~$50.7~~$48.3 million). Interest expense of CIP ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$0.3~~$14.8 million ~~(1.0%~~(48.8%) to ~~$30.3~~$45.1 million (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~$30.6~~$30.3 million). The ~~decline~~increase in interest income and interest expense of CIP in the ~~2014~~2015 period is primarily due to the impact of consolidation of CLO notes issued after March 31, 2014, exceeding the impact of deconsolidation and paydowns of CLO ~~notes issued prior to 2012 exceeding the impact of CLO notes issued subsequent to January 1, 2012.~~notes.

Included in other gains/(losses) of CIP, net, are realized and unrealized gains and losses on the underlying investments and debt of CIP. In the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, other gains and losses of CIP were a net gain of ~~$36.8~~$24.4 million, as compared to a net ~~loss~~gain of ~~$1.6~~$26.5 million in the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014. The decrease in the net gain in the ~~2014~~2015 period is primarily due to ~~an increase~~decreases in ~~market~~the fair value of private equity ~~investments. The net loss in~~investments and CLO investments exceeding the ~~2013 period is primarily due to losses~~gains associated with the increase in ~~market~~ value of the long-term debt of ~~CLOs exceeding gains associated with private equity and CLO investments.~~CLOs.

Net impact of CIP and related noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities

As illustrated in the Summary of Income Statement Impact of CIP table at the beginning of this Results of Operations section, the consolidation of investment products during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 resulted in an increase to net income of $36.7 million before attribution to noncontrolling interests. Invesco invests in only a portion of these products, and as a result this net gain is offset by noncontrolling interests of $38.7 million, resulting in a net decrease in net income of the company of ~~$2.0 million.~~$8.2 million, primarily representing the changes in the fair value of the company's holding in its consolidated CLOs, which is reclassified into other gains/(losses) from accumulated other comprehensive income upon consolidation.

The consolidation of investment products during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014 resulted in ~~a decrease~~an increase to net income of ~~$2.4~~$21.4 million before attribution to noncontrolling interests. ~~The addition~~This net gain is offset by noncontrolling interests of ~~noncontrolling interest losses of $1.1~~$16.1 million, ~~resulted~~resulting in a ~~total~~ net ~~decrease~~increase in net income of the company of ~~$3.5~~$5.3 million.

Table of Contents

Noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities represent the profit or loss amounts attributed to third party investors in CIP. ~~Movements~~The impact of any gains or losses resulting from valuation changes in ~~amounts~~the investments of non-CLO CIP attributable to the interests of third parties are offset by resulting changes in gains and losses attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities and therefore do not have a material effect on the financial condition, operating results (including earnings per share), liquidity or capital resources of the company's ~~Condensed Consolidated Statements~~common shareholders. Similarly, any gains or losses resulting from valuation changes in the investments of ~~Income generally~~CLOs attributable to the interests of third parties are offset by the ~~gains~~calculated value of the notes issued by the CLOs (offsetting in other gains/(losses) of CIP) and ~~losses, interest income and interest expense~~therefore also do not have a material effect on the financial condition, operating results (including earnings per share), liquidity or capital resources of ~~CIP.~~the company's common shareholders.

Additionally, CIP represent less than 1% of the company's AUM. Therefore, the net gains or losses of CIP are not indicative of the performance of the company's aggregate assets under management.

~~Table of Contents~~

CIP are taxed at the investor level and not at the product level; therefore, there is no tax provision reflected in the net impact of CIP.

Income Tax Expense

The company's subsidiaries operate in several taxing jurisdictions around the world, each with its own statutory income tax rate. As a result, the blended average statutory tax rate will vary from year to year depending on the mix of the profits and losses of the company's subsidiaries.

Our effective tax rate decreased to ~~25.3%~~26.3% for the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~28.6%~~29.9%). The inclusion of income from non-controlling interests in consolidated entities decreased our effective tax rate by ~~2.8%~~1.8% in the first quarter 2015 and decreased our rate by 2.0% in the first quarter 2014. First quarter 2014 ~~and 0.1% in 2013. 2014~~also included a ~~1.1%~~0.9% rate increase as a result of ~~applying the~~tax legislation changes in New York ~~(enacted in Q1) to~~and a ~~deferred tax asset recognized in Q2. The recognition~~3.2% rate increase as a result of ~~previously unrecognized tax benefits decreased our rate by 1.1%. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements - Note~~ 9 ~~"Taxation" for additional information. The remainder of the rate movement was primarily due to changes in the mix of pre-tax income.~~an FCA settlement referenced above.

6257

Table of Contents

~~Assets Under Management movements for the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared with the six months ended June 30, 2013~~

The AUM tables and the discussion below refer to AUM as long-term and short-term. Short-term AUM include institutional money market and Invesco PowerShares QQQ AUM. Long-term AUM are total AUM less short-term AUM.

~~Changes in AUM were as follows~~:

For the six months ended June 30,
2014 2013
$ in billions Total AUM Active Passive Total AUM Active Passive
January 1 778.7
639.0
139.7
667.4
553.4
114.0
Long-term inflows 92.7
77.7
15.0
92.0
66.7
25.3
Long-term outflows (93.1 ) (82.5 ) (10.6 ) (76.3 ) (58.7 ) (17.6 )
Long-term net flows (0.4 ) (4.8 ) 4.4
15.7
8.0
7.7
Net flows in Invesco Powershares QQQ fund (4.3 ) —
(4.3 ) 0.3
—
0.3
Net flows in institutional money market funds (5.0 ) (5.0 ) —
4.1
4.1
—
Total net flows (9.7 ) (9.8 ) 0.1
20.1
12.1
8.0
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 29.3
23.3
6.0
29.2
26.8
2.4
Foreign currency translation 4.1
4.1
—
(11.1 ) (10.4 ) (0.7 )
June 30 802.4
656.6
145.8
705.6
581.9
123.7
Average AUM
Average long-term AUM 667.2
569.7
97.5
597.5
507.7
89.8
Average short-term AUM 117.7
73.9
43.8
108.2
75.0
33.2
Average AUM 784.9
643.6
141.3
705.7
582.7
123.0
Revenue yield
Gross revenue yield on AUM ⁽¹⁾
65.6
77.3
13.0
64.0
75.2
11.1
Gross revenue yield on AUM before performance fees ⁽¹⁾
64.7
76.1
13.0
62.8
73.6
11.1
Net revenue yield on AUM ⁽²⁾
45.6
52.7
13.0
44.7
51.8
11.1
Net revenue yield on AUM before performance fees ⁽²⁾
44.5
51.5
13.0
43.4
50.2
11.1

~~(1)~~

Gross revenue yield on AUM is equal to annualized total operating revenues divided by average AUM, excluding joint venture (JV) AUM. Our share of the average AUM in the six months ended June 30, 2014 for our JVs in China was $4.9 billion (June 30, 2013: $3.5 billion). It is appropriate to exclude the average AUM of our JVs for purposes of computing gross revenue yield on AUM, because the revenues resulting from these AUM are not presented in our operating revenues. Under U.S. GAAP, our share of the net income of the JVs is recorded as equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates on our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Additionally, the numerator of the gross revenue yield measure, operating revenues, excludes the management fees earned from CIP; however, the denominator of the measure includes the AUM of these investment products. Therefore, the gross revenue yield measure is not considered representative of the company's true effective fee rate from AUM.


~~(2)~~	~~Net revenue yield on AUM is equal to annualized net revenues divided by average AUM. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for a reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues.~~

~~Flows~~

~~AUM at~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~were $802.4 billion (June 30, 2013: $705.6 billion). During the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~, long-term net outflows decreased AUM by $0.4 billion. We experienced net outflows in institutional money market funds of $5.0 billion and net outflows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund of $4.3 billion during the six months ended ~~June 30, 2014. During the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~, net long-term inflows increased AUM by $15.7 billion. We experienced net inflows in institutional money market funds of $4.1 billion and net inflows of Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund of $0.3 billion during the six months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~.

~~Net outflows during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~included active net long-term outflows of $4.8 billion, offset by net long-term inflows of passive AUM of $4.4 billion. Net outflows were comprised of net outflows from our retail distribution~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~channel of $0.6 billion, offset by inflows into our institutional channel of $0.2 billion. During the~~ ~~six months endedJune 30, 2014~~, U.K. equity income AUM experienced net outflows of $12.9 billion. During the second quarter of 2014, U.K. AUM experienced a single client withdrawal of $13.1 billion which included $6.2 billion of U.K. equity income AUM, $1.3 billion of other equity AUM and $5.6 billion of balanced AUM.

~~Long-term net inflows during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ were $15.7 billion, and included net long-term active inflows of $8.0 billion and passive inflows of $7.7 billion. Long-term net flows in 2013 were driven by net inflows of $15.2 billion into our retail distribution channel, primarily in the fixed income and balanced asset classes.

~~Average AUM during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~were $784.9 billion, compared to $705.7 billion for the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~.

~~Market Returns~~

~~During the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~, positive market movement increased AUM by $29.3 billion, with $19.4 billion attributed to our equity asset class. Our fixed income, alternatives and balanced asset classes were also positively impacted by the change in market valuations during the period, with market returns of $4.2 billion, $3.5 billion and $2.3 billion, respectively. During the six months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~, market gains increased AUM by $29.2 billion and included $31.6 billion in positive market movement of our equity asset class, which was partially offset by losses of $2.4 billion in our fixed income asset class.

~~Foreign Exchange Rates~~

~~The table below illustrates the spot foreign exchange rates used for translation of non-U.S. Dollar denominated AUM into U.S. Dollars:~~

Foreign Exchange Rates June 30, 2014 December 31, 2013 June 30, 2013 December 31, 2012
Pound Sterling ($ per £) 1.710
1.655
1.518
1.625
Canadian Dollar (CAD per $) 1.066
1.063
1.054
0.996
Japan (¥ per $) 101.310
105.080
99.320
86.520
Euro ($ per Euro) 1.369
1.378
1.300
1.319

~~During the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, we experienced increases in AUM of $4.1 billion due to changes in foreign exchange rates. Changes in foreign exchange rates in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ were driven primarily by the strengthening of the Pound Sterling relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in the translation of our Pound Sterling-based AUM into U.S. Dollars. The Japanese Yen also strengthened relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in the translation of our Yen-based AUM into U.S. Dollars, and was offset by the weakening of the Euro and the Canadian Dollar relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in the translation of Euro-based and Canadian Dollar-based AUM into U.S. Dollars.

~~In the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~, AUM decreased by $11.1 billion due to foreign exchange rate changes impacted by the weakening of the Pound Sterling, the Euro, the Canadian Dollar and the Japanese Yen relative to the U.S. Dollar, which was reflected in the translation of our Sterling-based, Euro-based, Canadian Dollar-based and Japanese Yen-based AUM into U.S. Dollars.

~~Revenue Yield~~

~~Net revenue yield on AUM increased 0.9 basis points to 45.6 basis points in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~as compared to the same period in 2013 (six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013: 44.7 basis points). Excluding performance fees, the net revenue yield increased 1.1 basis points to 44.5 basis points in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~from the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ ~~level of 43.4 basis points.~~

Changes in our AUM mix significantly impact our net revenue yield. For example, on an asset class basis, our equity and balanced AUM generally earn a higher net revenue rate than money market and fixed income AUM. The combination of average equity and average balanced AUM increased from 51.9% in the six months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~ ~~to 55.7% of total average AUM in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~. The comparable averages for money market and fixed income AUM both reduced. This change in asset class mix correlates with the increase in net revenue yield on AUM before performance fees in the six months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~when compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~.

~~Changes in the geographic mix of our AUM have also factored into the improved revenue yield. Sales have been strong in our Continental European business during recent quarters. As of~~ ~~June 30, 2014, the AUM attributable to clients domiciled in~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Continental Europe accounts for 8.8% of total AUM compared to 6.6% as of~~ ~~June 30, 2013. On average, the AUM in Continental Europe earn a higher fee rate than the company's average fee rate for existing total AUM.~~

~~The tables that follow analyze AUM into active and passive style. Passive AUM generally earn a lower effective fee rate than active asset classes. At~~ ~~June 30, 2014, passive AUM were $145.8 billion, representing 18.2% of total AUM at that date; whereas at~~ ~~June 30, 2013, passive AUM were $123.7 billion, representing 17.5% of our total AUM at that date. In the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, the net revenue yield on passive AUM was 13.0 basis points compared to 11.1 basis points in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013, an increase of 1.9 basis points, due to changes in mix of passive AUM including sales of the PowerShares ETFs. The increase in the average yield from passive AUM in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~when compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ ~~has offset any reduction in total net revenue yield normally associated with the higher level of passive AUM as a percentage of total AUM.~~

The increase in passive AUM includes the movements in the Powershares QQQ Nasdaq-100 index tracking fund. The Powershares QQQ fund AUM increased to $44.0 billion at June 30, 2014 compared to $34.0 billion at June 30, 2013. The revenue yield for Invesco on this product is less than 1 basis point, reimbursing Invesco for the portfolio trading services provided to the fund, and flows into and out of this product therefore have a significant impact on the overall net revenue yield and are a significant factor in the year-over-year yield changes.

~~Gross revenue yield on AUM increased 1.6 basis points to 65.6 basis points in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~from the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ level of 64.0 basis points. Management does not consider gross revenue yield, the most comparable U.S. GAAP-based measure to net revenue yield, to be a meaningful effective fee rate measure for the reasons outlined in footnote 1 to the Changes in AUM table above. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for a reconciliation of operating revenues (gross revenues) to net revenues.

~~Changes in our AUM by channel, asset class, and client domicile, and average AUM by asset class, are presented below:~~

~~Total AUM by Channel~~ ⁽¹⁾

$ in billions Total Retail Institutional
December 31, 2013 AUM 778.7
519.6
259.1
Long-term inflows 92.7
75.9
16.8
Long-term outflows (93.1 ) (76.5 ) (16.6 )
Long-term net flows (0.4 ) (0.6 ) 0.2
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund (4.3 ) (4.3 ) —
Net flows in institutional money market funds (5.0 ) —
(5.0 )
Total net flows (9.7 ) (4.9 ) (4.8 )
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 29.3
26.5
2.8
Foreign currency translation 4.1
3.6
0.5
June 30, 2014 AUM 802.4
544.8
257.6

December 31, 2012 AUM 667.4
425.8
241.6
Long-term inflows 92.0
73.9
18.1
Long-term outflows (76.3 ) (58.7 ) (17.6 )
Long-term net flows 15.7
15.2
0.5
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund 0.3
0.3
—
Net flows in institutional money market funds 4.1
—
4.1
Total net flows 20.1
15.5
4.6
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 29.2
24.5
4.7
Foreign currency translation (11.1 ) (8.1 ) (3.0 )
June 30, 2013 AUM 705.6
457.7
247.9

~~____________~~

~~See accompanying notes immediately following these AUM tables.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Passive AUM by Channel~~ ⁽¹⁾

$ in billions Total Retail Institutional
December 31, 2013 AUM 139.7
118.2
21.5
Long-term inflows 15.0
13.5
1.5
Long-term outflows (10.6 ) (9.5 ) (1.1 )
Long-term net flows 4.4
4.0
0.4
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund (4.3 ) (4.3 ) —
Net flows in institutional money market funds —
—
—
Total net flows 0.1
(0.3 ) 0.4
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 6.0
6.0
—
Foreign currency translation —
—
—
June 30, 2014 AUM 145.8
123.9
21.9

December 31, 2012 AUM 114.0
91.2
22.8
Long-term inflows 25.3
20.4
4.9
Long-term outflows (17.6 ) (13.9 ) (3.7 )
Long-term net flows 7.7
6.5
1.2
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund 0.3
0.3
—
Net flows in institutional money market funds —
—
—
Total net flows 8.0
6.8
1.2
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 2.4
2.0
0.4
Foreign currency translation (0.7 ) —
(0.7 )
June 30, 2013 AUM 123.7
100.0
23.7

~~____________~~

~~See accompanying notes immediately following these AUM tables.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Total AUM by Asset Class~~ ⁽²⁾

$ in billions Total Equity Fixed Income Balanced Money Market
Alternatives⁽³⁾
December 31, 2013 AUM 778.7
383.1
171.7
53.3
82.7
87.9
Long-term inflows 92.7
48.8
18.0
9.3
1.4
15.2
Long-term outflows (93.1 ) (55.5 ) (12.9 ) (12.8 ) (1.7 ) (10.2 )
Long-term net flows (0.4 ) (6.7 ) 5.1
(3.5 ) (0.3 ) 5.0
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund (4.3 ) (4.3 ) —
—
—
—
Net flows in institutional money market funds (5.0 ) —
—
—
(5.0 ) —
Total net flows (9.7 ) (11.0 ) 5.1
(3.5 ) (5.3 ) 5.0
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 29.3
19.4
4.4
2.3
(0.3 ) 3.5
Foreign currency translation 4.1
2.7
0.7
0.5
—
0.2
June 30, 2014 AUM 802.4
394.2
181.9
52.6
77.1
⁽⁴⁾
96.6
Average AUM 784.9
384.5
177.1
52.9
78.2
92.2
% of total average AUM 100.0 % 49.0 % 22.6 % 6.7 % 10.0 % 11.7 %

December 31, 2012 AUM 667.4
295.6
171.9
43.6
73.3
83.0
Long-term inflows 92.0
39.5
23.7
12.6
1.9
14.3
Long-term outflows (76.3 ) (38.6 ) (18.6 ) (5.5 ) (1.5 ) (12.1 )
Long-term net flows 15.7
0.9
5.1
7.1
0.4
2.2
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund 0.3
0.3
—
—
—
—
Net flows in institutional money market funds 4.1
—
—
—
4.1
—
Total net flows 20.1
1.2
5.1
7.1
4.5
2.2
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 29.2
31.6
(2.4 ) 0.4
—
(0.4 )
Foreign currency translation (11.1 ) (7.0 ) (1.5 ) (1.4 ) —
(1.2 )
June 30, 2013 AUM 705.6
321.4
173.1
49.7
77.8
83.6
Average AUM 705.7
317.2
175.6
49.3
79.1
84.5
% of total average AUM 100.0 % 44.9 % 24.9 % 7.0 % 11.2 % 12.0 %

~~____________~~

~~See accompanying notes immediately following these AUM tables.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Passive AUM by Asset Class~~ ⁽²⁾

$ in billions Total Equity Fixed Income Balanced Money Market
Alternatives⁽³⁾
December 31, 2013 AUM 139.7
85.6
39.5
—
—
14.6
Long-term inflows 15.0
9.7
3.6
—
—
1.7
Long-term outflows (10.6 ) (6.8 ) (1.8 ) —
—
(2.0 )
Long-term net flows 4.4
2.9
1.8
—
—
(0.3 )
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund (4.3 ) (4.3 ) —
—
—
—
Total net flows 0.1
(1.4 ) 1.8
—
—
(0.3 )
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 6.0
4.8
0.7
—
—
0.5
Foreign currency translation —
—
—
—
—
—
June 30, 2014 AUM 145.8
89.0
42.0
—
—
14.8
Average AUM 141.3
85.9
40.9
—
—
14.5
% of total average AUM 100.0 % 60.8 % 28.9 % — % — % 10.3 %

December 31, 2012 AUM 114.0
55.5
39.0
—
—
19.5
Long-term inflows 25.3
13.1
9.7
—
—
2.5
Long-term outflows (17.6 ) (8.0 ) (4.6 ) —
—
(5.0 )
Long-term net flows 7.7
5.1
5.1
—
—
(2.5 )
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund 0.3
0.3
—
—
—
—
Net flows in institutional money market funds —
—
—
—
—
—
Total net flows 8.0
5.4
5.1
—
—
(2.5 )
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 2.4
4.8
(1.6 ) —
—
(0.8 )
Foreign currency translation (0.7 ) —
—
—
—
(0.7 )
June 30, 2013 AUM 123.7
65.7
42.5
—
—
15.5
Average AUM 123.0
62.6
42.8
—
—
17.6
% of total average AUM 100.0 % 50.9 % 34.8 % — % — % 14.3 %

~~____________~~

~~See accompanying notes immediately following these AUM tables.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Total AUM by Client Domicile~~ ⁽⁵⁾

$ in billions Total U.S. Canada U.K. Continental Europe Asia
December 31, 2013 AUM 778.7
521.3
27.1
114.8
60.9
54.6
Long-term inflows 92.7
44.4
2.0
11.2
21.7
13.4
Long-term outflows (93.1 ) (40.6 ) (2.3 ) (26.8 ) (11.8 ) (11.6 )
Long-term net flows (0.4 ) 3.8
(0.3 ) (15.6 ) 9.9
1.8
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund (4.3 ) (4.3 ) —
—
—
—
Net flows in institutional money market funds (5.0 ) (4.1 ) —
2.0
(3.0 ) 0.1
Total net flows (9.7 ) (4.6 ) (0.3 ) (13.6 ) 6.9
1.9
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 29.3
20.8
1.9
2.9
2.6
1.1
Foreign currency translation 4.1
—
—
3.5
—
0.6
June 30, 2014 AUM 802.4
537.5
28.7
107.6
70.4
58.2

December 31, 2012 AUM 667.4
452.5
25.2
101.9
38.8
49.0
Long-term inflows 92.0
55.7
2.1
8.1
16.4
9.7
Long-term outflows (76.3 ) (46.0 ) (2.6 ) (9.3 ) (8.9 ) (9.5 )
Long-term net flows 15.7
9.7
(0.5 ) (1.2 ) 7.5
0.2
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund 0.3
0.3
—
—
—
—
Net flows in institutional money market funds 4.1
4.2
—
0.3
(0.1 ) (0.3 )
Total net flows 20.1
14.2
(0.5 ) (0.9 ) 7.4
(0.1 )
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 29.2
14.7
1.6
9.8
0.5
2.6
Foreign currency translation (11.1 ) 0.1
(1.5 ) (6.5 ) (0.3 ) (2.9 )
June 30, 2013 AUM 705.6
481.5
24.8
104.3
46.4
48.6

~~____________~~

~~See accompanying notes immediately following these AUM tables.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Passive AUM by Client Domicile~~ ⁽⁵⁾

$ in billions Total U.S. Canada U.K. Continental Europe Asia
December 31, 2013 AUM 139.7
135.2
0.1
—
1.8
2.6
Long-term inflows 15.0
14.8
—
—
0.2
—
Long-term outflows (10.6 ) (9.9 ) —
—
(0.3 ) (0.4 )
Long-term net flows 4.4
4.9
—
—
(0.1 ) (0.4 )
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund (4.3 ) (4.3 ) —
—
—
—
Net flows in institutional money market funds —
—
—
—
—
—
Total net flows 0.1
0.6
—
—
(0.1 ) (0.4 )
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 6.0
5.9
—
—
0.1
—
Foreign currency translation —
—
—
—
—
—
June 30, 2014 AUM 145.8
141.7
0.1
—
1.8
2.2

December 31, 2012 AUM 114.0
107.8
0.1
—
1.1
5.0
Long-term inflows 25.3
24.8
—
—
0.4
0.1
Long-term outflows (17.6 ) (15.2 ) —
—
(0.2 ) (2.2 )
Long-term net flows 7.7
9.6
—
—
0.2
(2.1 )
Net flows in Invesco PowerShares QQQ fund 0.3
0.3
—
—
—
—
Net flows in institutional money market funds —
—
—
—
—
—
Total net flows 8.0
9.9
—
—
0.2
(2.1 )
Market gains and losses/reinvestment 2.4
2.0
—
—
—
0.4
Foreign currency translation (0.7 ) —
—
—
—
(0.7 )
June 30, 2013 AUM 123.7
119.7
0.1
—
1.3
2.6


~~(1)~~	Channel refers to the internal distribution channel from which the AUM originated. Retail AUM represents AUM distributed by the company's retail sales team. Institutional AUM represents AUM distributed by our institutional sales team. This aggregation is viewed as a proxy for presenting AUM in the retail and institutional markets in which the company operates.


~~(2)~~	~~Asset classes are descriptive groupings of AUM by common type of underlying investments.~~


~~(3)~~	~~There have been no significant changes to the managed objectives under the Alternatives asset class, which are disclosed in our most recent Form 10-K for the year ended~~ ~~December 31, 2013~~.


~~(4)~~	~~Ending Money Market AUM includes $73.1 billion in institutional money market AUM and $4.0 billion in retail money market AUM.~~


~~(5)~~	~~Client domicile disclosure groups AUM by the domicile of the underlying clients.~~

~~Results of Operations for the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~

To assist in the comparisons, the discussion that follows will separate the impact of CIP from the overall consolidated results of operations. The impact is illustrated in the tables immediately below by a column which shows the dollar-value change in the consolidated figures, as caused by the consolidation of CIP. For example, the impact of CIP on total operating revenues for the six months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~ was a reduction of $17.0 million. This indicates that the consolidation of CIP reduced consolidated revenues by $17.0 million, primarily reflecting the elimination upon consolidation of the revenues earned by Invesco for managing these investment products. The discussion below includes the use of non-GAAP financial measures. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional details and reconciliations of the most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures to the non-GAAP measures.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Summary of Income Statement Impact of CIP~~

Six months ended June 30,
2014 2013
$ in millions Impact of CIP Invesco Ltd. Consolidated Impact of CIP Invesco Ltd. Consolidated
Total operating revenues (17.0 ) 2,559.4
(17.8 ) 2,247.7
Total operating expenses 14.3
1,960.3
11.8
1,706.8
Operating income (31.3 ) 599.1
(29.6 ) 540.9
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates (3.4 ) 15.5
(1.2 ) 15.0
Interest and dividend income (1.5 ) 6.0
(3.7 ) 4.3
Interest expense —
(36.9 ) —
(19.7 )
Other gains and losses, net (4.7 ) 22.8
—
18.1
Other income/(loss) of CSIP, net —
15.9
—
—
Interest and dividend income of CIP 96.3
96.3
101.0
101.0
Interest expense of CIP (60.6 ) (60.6 ) (63.3 ) (63.3 )
Other gains/(losses) of CIP, net 63.3
63.3
(22.7 ) (22.7 )
Income from continuing operations before taxes 58.1
721.4
(19.5 ) 573.6
Income tax provision —
(196.0 ) —
(169.8 )
Income from continuing operations, net of taxes 58.1
525.4
(19.5 ) 403.8
Income/(loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes —
(1.8 ) —
(0.5 )
Net income 58.1
523.6
(19.5 ) 403.3
Net (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities (54.8 ) (61.3 ) 19.1
21.5
Net income attributable to common shareholders 3.3
462.3
(0.4 ) 424.8

~~Operating Revenues and Net Revenues~~

~~The main categories of revenues, and the dollar and percentage change between the periods, are as follows:~~

Variance
Six months ended June 30, 2014 vs 2013
$ in millions 2014 2013 $ Change % Change
Investment management fees 1,997.3
1,730.1
267.2
15.4 %
Service and distribution fees 453.3
422.0
31.3
7.4 %
Performance fees 36.1
42.1
(6.0 ) (14.3 )%
Other 72.7
53.5
19.2
35.9 %
Total operating revenues 2,559.4
2,247.7
311.7
13.9 %
Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses (816.0 ) (712.1 ) (103.9 ) 14.6 %
Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments 28.4
22.2
6.2
27.9 %
CIP 17.0
17.8
(0.8 ) (4.5 )%
Other reconciling items —
2.7
(2.7 ) (100.0 )%
Net revenues 1,788.8
1,578.3
210.5
13.3 %

~~Operating revenues increased by 13.9% in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ to ~~$2,559.4 million~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$2,247.7 million). Net revenues increased by 13.3% in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~to $1,788.8 million (six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: $1,578.3 million). Net revenues are operating revenues less third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses, plus our proportional share of net revenues from joint venture arrangements, plus management and performance fees earned from, less other revenues recorded by, CIP, plus other reconciling items. See “ Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for additional important disclosures regarding the use of net revenues.

~~Table of Contents~~

A significant portion of our business and AUM is based outside of the U.S. The strengthening or weakening of the U.S. Dollar against other currencies, primarily the Pound Sterling, Canadian Dollar, Euro and Japanese Yen will impact our reported revenues and expenses from period to period. The income statements of foreign currency subsidiaries are translated into U.S. Dollars, the reporting currency of the company, using average foreign exchange rates. The impact of foreign exchange rate movements increased operating revenues by ~~$41.2 million, equivalent to~~ ~~1.6%~~ ~~of total operating revenues, during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~when compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~. Additionally, our revenues are directly influenced by the level and composition of our AUM. Therefore, movements in global capital market levels, net new business inflows (or outflows) and changes in the mix of investment products between asset classes and geographies may materially affect our revenues from period to period. As illustrated in the Executive Overview, returns from capital markets were mixed in the six months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~.

~~Investment Management Fees~~

~~Investment management fees increased by $267.2 million (15.4%) in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, to~~ ~~$1,997.3 million~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$1,730.1 million~~). In April 2014, our U.K. Invesco Perpetual business introduced a single Fund Management Fee (FMF) for their retail funds to replace the separate annual management fee and registration fee. This results in an increase in investment management fees of $29.6 million and a corresponding a reduction in service and distribution fees during the ~~six months endedJune 30, 2014~~. After adjusting for the introduction of the single FMF, the increase is equivalent to 13.7%. This compares to an 11.2% increase in average AUM and an 11.7% increase in average long-term AUM. As discussed above, the net revenue yield is higher in the six months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~when compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ ~~due to changes in the composition of our AUM. See the company's disclosures regarding the changes in AUM and revenue yields during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~in the “Assets Under Management” section above for additional information regarding the movements in AUM. The impact of foreign exchange rate movements increased investment management fees by~~ ~~$38.0 million~~ ~~during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~as compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~.

~~Service and Distribution Fees~~

~~In the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, service and distribution fees increased by $31.3 million (7.4%) to~~ ~~$453.3 million~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$422.0 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements increased service and distribution fees by $0.8 million during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~. Service and distribution fees increases in 2014 in line with increases in average AUM and revenue yields, as well as a new recurring asset-based service fee that began in 2014. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $29.6 million driven by the introduction of a single FMF for several U.K. funds as noted above.

~~Performance Fees~~

~~In the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, performance fees decreased by $6.0 million (14.3%) to~~ ~~$36.1 million~~ ~~when compared to the performance fees in six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ of ~~$42.1 million. The performance fees generated in~~ ~~2014~~ ~~arose primarily due to products managed by the U.K. investment teams ($27.6 million) and the Global Quantitative Equity team ($3.5 million). During the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, U.K. performance fees included $8.0 million from Edinburgh Investment Trust PLC (six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013: $17.5 million). Future management fees receivable from the Trust will not include a performance fee component. In the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013, performance fees were generated by a variety of products and were sourced from the U.K. and Europe ($33.8 million), Asia Pacific ($4.5 million) and the U.S. ($3.8 million).~~

~~Other Revenues~~

~~In the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, other revenues increased by $19.2 million (35.9%) to~~ ~~$72.7 million~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$53.5 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements increased other revenues~~ ~~$0.4 million~~ ~~during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~as compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013. After allowing for foreign exchange rate changes, the increase in other revenues was $18.8 million. The increase in other revenues during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ include increases in mutual funds front end fees of $6.9 million, real estate acquisition and disposition fees of $8.3 million, transaction commissions of $0.2 million generated by our private equity group, and other revenues of $2.7 million. The increase in front end fees relates to increased sales activity in Continental Europe.

~~Third-Party Distribution, Service and Advisory Expenses~~

~~Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses increased by $103.9 million (14.6%) in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ to ~~$816.0 million~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$712.1 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements increased third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses by~~ ~~$13.3 million~~ ~~during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ as

~~Table of Contents~~

~~compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~. After allowing for foreign exchange rate changes, the increase in third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses was $90.6 million. The increase includes increases in renewal commissions of $42.0 million, distribution fees of $30.9 million, external commissions of $8.4 million and transfer agent fees of $9.3 million. The overall increase is reflective of the higher related retail management fees, service and distribution fees and front-end load fees (recorded in other revenues).

~~Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from jointventure investments~~

~~Our proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments increased by $6.2 million (27.9%) to $28.4 million for the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013: $22.2 million). The increase moved in line with our share of the Invesco Great Wall joint venture's average AUM for the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, which increased 40% to $4.9 billion compared to $3.5 billion for the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~.

~~Management, performance and other fees earned from CIP~~

~~The elimination of management and performance fees earned from CIP decreased by $0.7 million to $17.1 million in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: $17.8 million) while other revenues of $0.1 million (six months ended June 30, 2013: $0.4 million) were recorded by CIP in the six months ended June 30, 2014. The decrease is primarily due to the impact of funds deconsolidated during the six months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~. Once the funds are deconsolidated, the management and performance fees are no longer eliminated and are reflected in the respective revenue line items in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

~~Operating Expenses~~

~~The main categories of operating expenses, and the dollar and percentage changes between periods, are as follows:~~

Six months ended June 30, Variance
$ in millions 2014 2013 $ Change % Change
Employee compensation 705.0
665.6
39.4
5.9 %
Third-party distribution, service and advisory 816.0
712.1
103.9
14.6 %
Marketing 53.6
46.0
7.6
16.5 %
Property, office and technology 188.0
135.1
52.9
39.2 %
General and administrative 197.7
144.8
52.9
36.5 %
Transaction and integration —
3.2
(3.2 ) (100.0 )%
Total operating expenses 1,960.3
1,706.8
253.5
14.9 %

$ in millions Six months ended June 30, 2014 % of Total Operating Expenses % of Operating Revenues Six months ended June 30, 2013 % of Total Operating Expenses % of Operating Revenues
Employee compensation 705.0
36.0 % 27.5 % 665.6
39.0 % 29.6 %
Third-party distribution, service and advisory 816.0
41.6 % 31.9 % 712.1
41.7 % 31.7 %
Marketing 53.6
2.7 % 2.1 % 46.0
2.7 % 2.0 %
Property, office and technology 188.0
9.6 % 7.3 % 135.1
7.9 % 6.0 %
General and administrative 197.7
10.1 % 7.7 % 144.8
8.5 % 6.5 %
Transaction and integration —
— % — % 3.2
0.2 % 0.1 %
Total operating expenses 1,960.3
100.0 % 76.6 % 1,706.8
100.0 % 75.9 %

~~During the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, operating expenses increased by $253.5 million (14.9%) to~~ ~~$1,960.3 million~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013: $1,706.8 million). Excluding transaction and integration, all expense categories increased in 2014 when compared to 2013. The impact of foreign exchange rate movements increased operating expenses by~~ ~~$28.2 million, or~~ ~~1.4%~~ ~~of total operating expenses, during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~as compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Employee Compensation~~

~~Employee compensation increased $39.4 million (5.9%) to~~ ~~$705.0 million~~ ~~in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$665.6 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements increased employee compensation by~~ ~~$7.0 million~~ ~~during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~as compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013. After allowing for foreign exchange rate changes, the increase in employee compensation was $32.4 million.~~

Direct compensation increased $35.6 million, primarily due to improved company performance. The increase includes higher base salaries and incentive compensation of $40.6 million other direct compensation expense of $2.4 million. Other employee compensation decreased $5.1 million and includes a decrease in commissions and other compensation costs, offset by an increase in staff relocation costs during the six months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~as compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013. Both direct and other compensation include costs associated with staff severance, including the acceleration of share-based costs. The six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~includes total severance costs of $7.2 million associated with a business optimization initiative undertaken during the first quarter.~~

~~Headcount at~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~was 6,070 (at~~ ~~June 30, 2013, on a continuing operations basis: 5,818).~~

~~Third-Party Distribution, Service and Advisory Expenses~~

~~Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses are discussed above in the operating and net revenues section.~~

~~Marketing~~

~~Marketing expenses increased by $7.6 million (16.5%) in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ to ~~$53.6 million~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$46.0 million). Excluding the impact of foreign exchange rate movements that increased marketing expenses~~ ~~$1.0 million, the increase in marketing expenses was $6.6 million during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~as compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~.

~~The increase during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ includes increases in advertising expenses of $3.8 million, primarily in EMEA, client event expenses of $1.8 million, marketing travel expenses of $0.7 million and other marketing costs of $0.3 million.

~~Property, Office and Technology~~

~~Property, office and technology costs increased by $52.9 million (39.2%) to~~ ~~$188.0 million~~ ~~in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$135.1 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements increased property, office and technology expenses by~~ ~~$1.3 million~~ ~~during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~as compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013. After allowing for foreign exchange rate movements, the increase was $51.6 million.~~

~~Property and office costs increased $39.0 million in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ compared to the same period in 2013, due primarily to charges of $35.8 million associated with vacating leased properties in connection with a business optimization initiative undertaken during the period. Property and office costs are generally trending upwards, due to market conditions. However, the business optimization initiative undertaken in the first quarter of 2014 has partially mitigated the increases in the current period, and therefore property and office costs (excluding the business optimization charge) have remained comparable to the same period in 2013. Other increases in property and office costs in the six months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~as compared to 2013 include $2.4 million in operating service and property management fees.~~

~~Technology and communications expenses increased $12.6 million in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ over the comparable 2013 period primarily due to increase in depreciation and maintenance of $5.2 million and increased outsourced administration costs of $7.6 million driven by increased European sales activity.

~~General and Administrative~~

~~General and administrative expenses increased by $52.9 million (36.5%) to~~ ~~$197.7 million~~ ~~in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$144.8 million). The impact of foreign exchange rate movements increased general and administrative expenses by $5.6 million during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~as compared to the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013. After allowing for foreign exchange rate movements, the increase was $47.3 million.~~

The increase in general and administrative expense is primarily due to an FCA penalty of £18.6 million ($31.1 million) and related legal costs of $0.5 million that were incurred in the six months ended ~~June 30, 2014. Other increases include $14.8 million of mutual fund expenses due in part to a $5.3 millionfund reimbursement settlement cost associated with historical~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~management fees in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, as well as increases of $0.9 million in product launch costs and other general and administrative costs. The six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ ~~included a $2.5 million legal settlement credit.~~

~~Transaction and integration~~

~~There were no transaction and integration charges in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~:~~$3.2 million). Transaction and integration expenses during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ ~~relate to fund mergers and include professional services and shareholder communications costs. These costs ceased in the first half of 2013.~~

~~Operating Income, Adjusted Operating Income, Operating Margin and Adjusted Operating Margin~~

~~Operating income increased by $58.2 million (10.8%) to~~ ~~$599.1 million~~ ~~in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$540.9 million). Operating margin (operating income divided by operating revenues), decreased to 23.4% in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~from 24.1% in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~. The decrease in operating margin resulted from a lower relative increase in operating revenues (13.9%) than in operating expenses (14.9%) during the period. Adjusted operating income increased by $123.2 million (20.0%) to $740.0 million in the six months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~from $616.8 million in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013. Adjusted operating margin increased to 41.4% in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~from 39.1% in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~. See “Schedule of Non-GAAP Information” for a reconciliation of operating revenues to net revenues, a reconciliation of operating income to adjusted operating income and additional important disclosures regarding net revenues, adjusted operating income and adjusted operating margin.

~~Other Income and Expenses~~

~~The main categories of other income and expenses, and the dollar and percentage changes between periods are as follows:~~

Variance
Six months ended June 30, 2014 vs 2013
$ in millions 2014 2013 $ Change % Change
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates 15.5
15.0
0.5
3.3 %
Interest and dividend income 6.0
4.3
1.7
39.5 %
Interest expense (36.9 ) (19.7 ) (17.2 ) 87.3 %
Other gains and losses, net 22.8
18.1
4.7
26.0 %
Other income/(loss) of CSIP, net 15.9
—
15.9
N/A
Other income and expenses of CIP:

Interest and dividend income of CIP 96.3
101.0
(4.7 ) (4.7 )%
Interest expense of CIP (60.6 ) (63.3 ) 2.7
(4.3 )%
Other gains/(losses) of CIP, net 63.3
(22.7 ) 86.0
N/A
Total other income and expenses 122.3
32.7
89.6
274.0 %

~~Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates~~

~~Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates increased by $0.5 million (3.3%) to~~ ~~$15.5 million~~ ~~in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$15.0 million). The~~ ~~increase~~ in equity in earnings is comprised of a $2.7 million increase in our share of earnings of our joint venture investments in China, $1.4 million in net increases in our share of the market-driven valuation change in the underlying holdings of our private equity partnership investments, $2.6 million increase in earnings from our real estate partnership investments, partially offset by decreases of $5.6 million in our investment in Invesco Mortgage Capital Inc. and $0.6 million in certain other partnerships.

~~Interest and dividend income and interest expense~~

~~Interest and dividend income increased by $1.7 million (39.5%) to~~ ~~$6.0 million~~ ~~in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(three months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$4.3 million~~).

~~Interest expense increased by $17.2 million (87.3%) to~~ ~~$36.9 million~~ ~~in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$19.7 million) primarily due to the changes in long-term financing arrangements made during the fourth quarter of 2013 which increased the overall borrowing costs versus the comparative period.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Other gains and losses, net~~

~~Other gains and losses, net were a gain of~~ ~~$22.8 million~~ ~~in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~as compared to a net gain of~~ ~~$18.1 million~~ ~~in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013. Included within other gains and losses, net in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~is a net gain of $10.9 million resulting from the appreciation of investments held for our deferred compensation plans (six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013: $18.5 million net gain) and net realized gains from available-for-sale and other investments of $10.8 million (six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013: $1.9 million net gain). The six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ also included a net loss of $0.7 million related to the mark-to-market of foreign exchange put option contracts intended to provide protection against the impact of a significant decline in the Pound Sterling/U.S Dollar foreign exchange rate and $1.6 million in net foreign exchange losses on the revaluation of intercompany foreign currency denominated loans into the various functional currencies of our subsidiaries.

~~Other income/(loss) of CSIP~~

~~In the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~, other income/(loss) of CSIP, net totaled $15.9 million in income and consists of $4.4 million of interest and dividend income and other gains/(losses) of $11.5 million on investment holdings. CSIP products were initially consolidated in the third quarter of 2013. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements - Notes 1~~, "Accounting Policies" and 12, “Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products,” for additional details.~~

~~Non-operating income and expense of CIP~~

~~In the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, interest and dividend income of CIP decreased by $4.7 million (4.7%) to~~ ~~$96.3 million~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$101.0 million). Interest expense of CIP decreased by $2.7 million (4.3%) to~~ ~~$60.6 million~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$63.3 million~~). The decline in interest income and interest expense of CIP in the 2014 period is due to the impact of CLO deconsolidation and paydowns of CLO notes issued prior to 2012 exceeding the impact of CLO notes issued subsequent to January 1, 2012.

~~Included in other gains/(losses) of CIP, net, are realized and unrealized gains and losses on the underlying investments and debt of CIP. In the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014, other gains and losses of CIP were a net gain of~~ ~~$63.3 million, as compared to a net loss of~~ ~~$22.7 million~~ ~~in the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013. The net gain in the~~ ~~2014~~ period is primarily associated with an increase in market value of private equity investments exceeding losses associated with an increase in the market value of the long-term debt of CLOs. The net loss in the 2013 period is primarily due to losses associated with the increase in market value of the long-term debt of CLOs exceeding gains associated with private equity and CLO investments.

~~Net impact of CIP and related noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities~~

~~As illustrated in the Summary of Income Statement Impact of CIP table at the beginning of this Results of Operations section, the consolidation of investment products during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~resulted in~~ ~~an increase~~ ~~to net income of~~ ~~$58.1 million~~ ~~before attribution to noncontrolling interests. Invesco invests in only a portion of these products, and as a result this net~~ ~~gain~~ ~~is offset by noncontrolling interests of~~ ~~$54.8 million, resulting in~~ ~~a net increase~~ ~~in net income of the company of~~ ~~$3.3 million~~.

~~The consolidation of investment products during the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~ resulted in a decrease to net income of $19.5 million before attribution to noncontrolling interests. This net loss is offset by noncontrolling interests of $19.1 million, resulting in a net decrease in net income of the company of $0.4 million.

~~Income Tax Expense~~

~~Our effective tax rate decreased to~~ ~~27.2%~~ ~~for the six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six months ended~~ ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~29.6%~~). The inclusion of income from non-controlling interests in consolidated entities decreased our effective tax rate by 2.5% in 2014, whereas the inclusion of losses increased our rate by 1.1% in 2013. 2014 includes a 1.1% rate increase as result of tax legislation changes in New York and a 1.2% rate increase as a result of the FCA settlement referenced above. The recognition of previously unrecognized tax benefits decreased our rate by 0.7%. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements - Note 9 ~~"Taxation" for additional information. The remainder of the rate movement was primarily due to changes in the mix of pre-tax income.~~

~~Income from Discontinued Operations~~

On December 31, 2013, the company completed the sale of Atlantic Trust. The operating results and the gain associated with the sale are reflected as discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and are therefore excluded from the continuing operations of Invesco. See Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 15~~, "Discontinued Operations."~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Schedule of Non-GAAP Information

We are presenting the following non-GAAP performance measures: net revenues (and by calculation, net revenue yield on AUM), adjusted operating income (and by calculation, adjusted operating margin), adjusted net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. (and by calculation, adjusted diluted earnings per share (EPS)). We believe these non-GAAP measures provide greater transparency into our business on an ongoing operations basis and allow more appropriate comparisons with industry peers. Management uses these performance measures to evaluate the business, and they are consistent with internal management reporting. The most directly comparable U.S. GAAP measures are operating revenues (and by calculation, gross revenue yield on AUM), operating income (and by calculation, operating margin), and net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. (and by calculation, diluted EPS). Each of these measures is discussed more fully below.

These non-GAAP measures should not be considered as substitutes for any measures derived in accordance with U.S. GAAP and may not be comparable to other similarly titled measures of other companies. Additional reconciling items may be added in the future to these non-GAAP measures if deemed appropriate. The tax effect related to reconciling items that are presented net of tax have been calculated based on the tax rate attributable to the jurisdiction to which the transaction relates.

The following are reconciliations of operating revenues, operating income (and by calculation, operating margin), and net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. (and by calculation, diluted EPS) on a U.S. GAAP basis to net revenues, adjusted operating income (and by calculation, adjusted operating margin), and adjusted net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. (and by calculation, adjusted diluted EPS). Notes to the reconciliations follow the tables.

Reconciliation of Operating revenues to Net revenues:


	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,				Three months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2014		2013		2014		2013		2015		2014
Operating revenues, U.S. GAAP basis	1,289.9		1,135.5		2,559.4		2,247.7		1,291.6		1,269.5
Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments ⁽¹⁾	13.1		11.8		28.4		22.2		15.7		15.3
Third party distribution, service and advisory expenses⁽²⁾	(410.6	)	(366.0	)	(816.0	)	(712.1	)	(399.1	)	(405.4	)
CIP ⁽³⁾	8.6		9.0		17.0		17.8		9.3		8.4
Other reconciling items ⁽⁶⁾	—		—		—		2.7
Net revenues	901.0		790.3		1,788.8		1,578.3		917.5		887.8

Reconciliation of Operating income to Adjusted operating income:


	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,				Three months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2014		2013		2014		2013		2015		2014
Operating income, U.S. GAAP basis	354.8		273.9		599.1		540.9		338.1		244.3
Proportional share of revenues, net of third-party distribution expenses, from joint venture investments ⁽¹⁾	4.8		6.5		14.4		10.4
Proportional share of net operating income from joint venture investments ⁽¹⁾									7.0		9.6
CIP ⁽³⁾	10.3		18.3		31.3		29.6		21.5		21.0
Acquisition/disposition related adjustments ⁽⁴⁾	3.4		5.6		7.2		13.4		3.9		3.8
Compensation expense related to market valuation changes in deferred compensation plans ⁽⁵⁾	3.7		3.0		8.1		10.5		3.9		4.4
Other reconciling items ⁽⁶⁾	—		3.3		79.9		12.0		—		79.9
Adjusted operating income	377.0		310.6		740.0		616.8		374.4		363.0

Operating margin*	27.5	%	24.1	%	23.4	%	24.1	%	26.2	%	19.2	%
Adjusted operating margin**	41.8	%	39.3	%	41.4	%	39.1	%	40.8	%	40.9	%

7758

Table of Contents

Reconciliation of Net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. to Adjusted net income attributable to ~~common shareholders:~~Invesco Ltd.:


	Three months ended June 30,					Six months ended June 30,						Three months ended March 31,
$ in millions, except per share data	2014			2013		2014			2013			2015			2014
Net income attributable to common shareholders, U.S. GAAP basis	274.5			202.6		462.3			424.8
Net income attributable to Invesco Ltd., U.S. GAAP basis												259.6			187.8
CIP, eliminated upon consolidation ⁽³⁾	2.0			3.5		(3.3		)	0.4			8.2			(5.3		)
Acquisition/disposition related adjustments, net of tax ⁽⁴⁾	8.2			14.4		19.1			22.6			8.3			10.9
Deferred compensation plan market valuation changes and dividend income less compensation expense, net of tax ⁽⁵⁾	(2.3		)	1.0		(2.6		)	(7.5		)	(0.9		)	(0.3		)
Other reconciling items, net of tax ⁽⁶⁾	—			2.2		68.5			8.9			(3.1		)	68.5
Adjusted net income attributable to common shareholders	282.4			223.7		544.0			449.2
Adjusted net income attributable to Invesco Ltd.												272.1			261.6

Average shares outstanding - diluted	436.4			450.1		436.9			449.6			432.5			437.4
Diluted EPS		$0.63			$0.45		$1.06			$0.94			$0.60			$0.43
Adjusted diluted EPS***		$0.65			$0.50		$1.25			$1.00			$0.63			$0.60

~~___________________________~~____________


*	Operating margin is equal to operating income divided by operating revenues.


**	Adjusted operating margin is equal to adjusted operating income divided by net revenues.

***

Adjusted diluted EPS is equal to adjusted net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. divided by the weighted average number of common and restricted shares ~~outstanding amount used in~~outstanding. There is no difference between the ~~calculation of diluted EPS.~~calculated earnings per share amounts presented above and the calculated earnings per share amounts under the two class method.


(1)	Proportional share of net revenues and operating income from joint venture investments

The company's two joint venture investments in China are proportionately consolidated in the company's non-GAAP measures. Enhancing our operations in China is one effort that we believe could improve our competitive position over time. Accordingly, we believe that it is appropriate to evaluate the contribution of our joint venture investments to the operations of the business.


(2)	Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses

Third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses include renewal commissions, management fee rebates and distribution costs (12b-1 and marketing support) paid to brokers and independent financial advisors, and other service and administrative fees paid to third parties. While the terms used for these types of expenses vary by geography, they are all expense items that are closely linked to the value of AUM and the revenue earned by Invesco from AUM. Since the company has been deemed to be the principal in the third-party arrangements, the company must reflect these expenses gross of operating revenues under U.S. GAAP.

Management believes that the deduction of third-party distribution, service and advisory expenses from operating revenues in the computation of net revenues (and by calculation, net revenue yield on AUM) and the related computation of adjusted operating income (and by calculation, adjusted operating margin) appropriately reflects the nature of these expenses as revenue-sharing activities, as these costs are passed through to external parties who perform functions on behalf of, and distribute, the company’s managed funds. Further, these expenses vary extensively by geography due to the differences in distribution channels. The net presentation assists in identifying the revenue contribution generated by the business, removing distortions caused by the differing distribution channel fees and allowing for a fair comparison with U.S. peer investment managers and within Invesco’s own investment units. Additionally, management evaluates net revenue yield on AUM, which is equal to net revenues divided by average AUM during the reporting period. This financial measure is an indicator of the basis point net revenues we receive for each dollar of AUM we manage and is useful when evaluating the company’s performance relative to industry competitors and within the company for capital allocation purposes.

7859

Table of Contents


(3)	CIP

See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 13 - “Consolidated Investment Products” for a detailed analysis of the impact to the company’s Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements from the consolidation of CIP. The reconciling items add back the management and performance fees earned by Invesco from the consolidated products and remove the revenues and expenses recorded by the consolidated products that have been included in the U.S. GAAP Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income.

CIP Revenue:


	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,				Three months ended March 31,
$ in millions, except per share data	2014		2013		2014		2013		2015	2014
Management fees earned from CIP, eliminated upon consolidation	6.4		6.4		12.3		12.7		6.9	5.9
Performance fees earned from CIP, eliminated upon consolidation	2.3		3.0		4.8		5.5		2.4	2.5
Other revenues recorded by CIP	(0.1	)	(0.4	)	(0.1	)	(0.4	)
CIP related adjustments in arriving at net revenues	8.6		9.0		17.0		17.8		9.3	8.4


(4)	Acquisition/disposition related adjustments

Acquisition/disposition related adjustments ~~include transaction and integration expenses,~~are comprised of amounts incurred by the company in connection with business combinations, including intangible asset amortization ~~employee severance expenses associated with the cessation of activities~~and related ~~to a previous acquisition,~~tax effects, as well as tax cash flow benefits resulting from tax amortization of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible ~~assets, and all related tax effects.~~assets.

While finite-lived intangible assets are amortized under U.S. GAAP, there is no amortization charge on goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles. In certain qualifying situations, these can be amortized for tax purposes, generally over a 15-year period, as is the case in the U.S. These cash flows (in the form of reduced taxes payable) represent tax benefits that are not included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income absent an impairment charge or the disposal of the related business. The company receives these cash flow benefits but does not anticipate a sale or impairment of these assets in the foreseeable future, and therefore the deferred tax liability recognized under U.S. GAAP is not expected to be used either through a credit in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income or through settlement of tax obligations.

In addition, the results of the discontinued operations of Atlantic Trust have been excluded in arriving at adjusted net income attributable to ~~common shareholders,~~Invesco Ltd., which is the basis of calculating adjusted diluted EPS. Accordingly, the company's non-GAAP financial measures reflect only the continuing business of Invesco. Management believes this presentation assists in evaluating the ongoing business performance and aids comparability with peer companies that may not have similar discontinued operations.

Transaction and integration expenses reflect the legal, regulatory, advisory, valuation, integration-related employee incentive awards and other professional or consulting fees, general and administrative costs, including travel costs related to transactions and the costs of temporary staff involved in executing the transaction, and the post-closing costs of integrating the acquired business into the company’s existing operations, including incremental costs associated with achieving synergy savings. Additionally, transaction and integration expenses include legal costs related to the defense of legal challenges to auction rate preferred securities redemptions with respect to various closed-end funds included in a prior acquisition. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 11 ~~- “Commitments and Contingencies” for additional information related to this matter.~~

Management believes it is useful to investors and other users of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements to adjust for these acquisition/disposition related adjustments in arriving at adjusted operating income, adjusted operating margin and adjusted diluted EPS, as this will aid comparability of our results period to period, and aid comparability with peer companies that may not have similar acquisition and disposition related charges.

7960

Table of Contents

See table below for a reconciliation of acquisition/disposition related items:


	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,				Three months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2014		2013		2014		2013		2015		2014
Acquisition/disposition related:
Intangible amortization expense	3.4		3.8		7.2		7.8		2.7		3.8
Employee compensation expense	—		—		—		2.4
Transaction and integration expense	—		1.8		—		3.2
Other acquisition-related item									1.2		—
Adjustments to operating income	3.4		5.6		7.2		13.4		3.9		3.8
Taxation:
Taxation on amortization	(0.4	)	(0.4	)	(0.8	)	(0.8	)	(0.4	)	(0.4	)
Deferred taxation	5.4		5.4		10.9		10.8		5.3		5.5
Taxation on transaction and integration	—		(0.8	)	—		(1.3	)
Taxation on other acquisition-related items									(0.5	)	—
(Income)/loss from discontinued operations, net of taxes	(0.2	)	4.6		1.8		0.5		—		2.0
Adjustments to net income attributable to common shareholders	8.2		14.4		19.1		22.6
Adjustments to net income attributable to Invesco Ltd.									8.3		10.9


(5)	Market movement on deferred compensation plan liabilities

Certain deferred compensation plan awards involve a return to the employee linked to the appreciation (depreciation) of specified investments, typically the funds managed by the employee. Invesco hedges economically the exposure to market movements by holding these investments on its balance sheet. U.S. GAAP requires the appreciation (depreciation) in the compensation liability to be expensed over the award vesting period in proportion to the vested amount of the award as part of compensation expense. The full value of the investment appreciation (depreciation) is immediately recorded below operating income in other gains and losses. This creates a timing difference between the recognition of the compensation expense and the investment gain or loss impacting net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. and diluted EPS which will reverse over the life of the award and net to zero at the end of the multi-year vesting period. During periods of high market volatility these timing differences impact compensation expense, operating income and operating margin in a manner which, over the life of the award, will ultimately be offset by gains and losses recorded below operating income on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. The non-GAAP measures exclude the mismatch created by differing U.S. GAAP treatments of the market movement on the liability and the investments.

Since these plans are hedged economically, management believes it is useful to reflect the offset ultimately achieved from hedging the investment market exposure in the calculation of adjusted operating income (and by calculation, adjusted operating margin) and adjusted net income attributable to ~~common shareholders~~Invesco Ltd. (and by calculation, adjusted diluted EPS), to produce results that will be more comparable period to period. The related fund shares will have been purchased on or around the date of grant, eliminating any ultimate cash impact from market movements that occur over the vesting period.

Additionally, dividend income from investments held to hedge economically deferred compensation plans is recorded as dividend income and as compensation expense on the company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income on the record dates. This dividend income is passed through to the employee participants in the plan and is not retained by the company. The non-GAAP measures exclude this dividend income and related compensation expense.

8061

Table of Contents


(6)	Other reconciling items

Each of these other reconciling items has been adjusted from U.S. GAAP to arrive at the company's non-GAAP financial measures for the reasons either outlined in the paragraphs above, due to the unique character and magnitude of the reconciling item, or because the item represents a continuation of a reconciling item adjusted from U.S. GAAP in a prior period.

Three months ended June 30, Six months ended June 30,
$ in millions 2014 2013 2014 2013
Other non-GAAP adjustments:
Third party distribution, service and advisory expenses - European infrastructure initiative ^(a)
—
—
—
2.7
Adjustment to net revenues —
—
—
2.7
Business optimization charges: ^(b)

Employee compensation —
—
7.2
—
Property, office and technology —
—
35.8
—
Regulatory charge ^(c)
—
—
31.1
—
Legal fees for regulatory charge ^(c)
—
—
0.5
—
Fund reimbursement settlement costs ^(d)
—
—
5.3
—
European infrastructure initiative ^(a)
—
3.3
—
6.3
U.K. FSCS levy true-up ^(e)
—
—
—
3.0
Adjustments to operating income —
3.3
79.9
12.0
Foreign exchange hedge amortization^(f)
—
(0.6 ) (0.2 ) (0.8 )
Taxation:
Taxation on European infrastructure initiative ^(a)
—
(0.6 ) —
(1.7 )
Taxation on business optimization charges ^(b)
—
—
(9.0 ) —
Taxation on regulatory charges ^(c)
—
—
(0.1 ) —
Taxation on fund reimbursement settlement costs ^(d)
—
—
(2.1 ) —
Taxation on U.K. FSCS levy true-up ^(e)
—
—
—
(0.7 )
Taxation on foreign exchange hedge amortization ^(f)
—
0.1
—
0.1
Adjustments to net income attributable to common shareholders —
2.2
68.5
8.9



	Three months ended March 31,
$ in millions	2015		2014
Other non-GAAP adjustments:
Business optimization charges: ^(a)
Employee compensation	—		7.2
Property, office and technology	—		35.8
Regulatory charge ^(b)	—		31.1
Legal fees for regulatory charge ^(b)	—		0.5
Fund reimbursement settlement costs ^(c)	—		5.3
Adjustments to operating income	—		79.9
Foreign exchange hedge gain^(d)	(3.1	)	(0.2	)
Taxation:
Taxation on business optimization charges ^(a)	—		(9.0	)
Taxation on regulatory charges ^(b)	—		(0.1	)
Taxation on fund reimbursement settlement costs ^(c)	—		(2.1	)
Adjustments to net income attributable to Invesco Ltd.	(3.1	)	68.5


a.	European infrastructure transformational initiative: The company outsourced its European transfer agency and made certain structural changes to product and distribution platforms. This initiative was completed in 2013.

b.(a)

Business optimization: Operating expenses for ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2014 include property related charges of $35.8 million associated with vacating leased properties as part of a business optimization ~~initiative undertaken during the first quarter of 2014.~~initiative. Employee compensation expenses also includes severance costs of $7.2 million related to the initiative.

c.(b)

Operating expenses for ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2014 include a charge of £18.6 million ($31.1 million) ~~in the first quarter 2014~~ in respect of the penalty under the settlement of an enforcement proceeding reached with the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) pertaining to the company's compliance with certain FCA rules and regulations for the period from May 2008 to November 2012. This charge, together with settlement-related legal costs of $0.5 million, has been recorded in general and administrative expenses.


d.(c)	General and administrative expenses for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2014 include a $5.3 million multi-year fund reimbursement ~~settlement cost in the first quarter of 2014~~expense associated with historical private equity management fees. The charge resulted primarily from using a more appropriate methodology regarding the calculation of offsets to management fees.


e.	~~Included within general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2013 was a charge relating to a prior year levy from the U.K. Financial Services Compensation Scheme.~~

f.(d)

Included within other gains and losses, net is the mark-to-market of foreign exchange put option contracts intended to provide protection against the impact of a significant decline in the Pound Sterling/U.S. Dollar foreign exchange rate. These contracts provided coverage through ~~March 25, 2014.~~December 31, 2015. The adjustment from U.S. GAAP to non-GAAP earnings removes the impact of market volatility; therefore, the company's non-GAAP results include only the amortization of the cost of the contracts during the contract period.

~~Table of Contents~~

Balance Sheet Discussion

A summary of the balance sheet impact of CIP is presented below. The impact is illustrated in the tables immediately below by a column which shows the dollar-value change in the consolidated figures, as caused by the consolidation of CIP. For example, the impacts of CIP on accounts receivable and investments at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 were reductions of ~~$2.8~~$4.1 million and ~~$63.6~~$88.7 million, respectively. This indicates that the consolidation of CIP reduced accounts receivable and investments by these amounts, reflecting the elimination upon consolidation of the underlying net interests in CIP held by the company.

The majority of the company’s CIP are CLO-related. The collateral assets of the CLOs are held solely to satisfy the obligations of the CLOs. The company has no right to the benefits from, nor does it bear the risks associated with, the collateral assets held by the CLOs, beyond the company’s minimal direct investments in, and management fees generated from, CLOs. If the company were to liquidate, the collateral assets would not be available to the general creditors of the company, and as a result, the company does not consider them to be company assets. Likewise, if the CLOs were to liquidate, their investors would have no recourse to the general credit of the company. The company therefore does not consider this debt to be a

Table of Contents

company liability. As demonstrated by the balance sheet data that follows in this section and in the "Liquidity and Capital Resources" section, inclusion of the long-term debt of consolidated investment products within liquidity measures, such as debt-to-equity measures, causes the company to appear far more indebted than is the case.

~~Table of Contents~~

Summary of Balance Sheet Impact of CIP


	June 30, 2014				December 31, 2013				June 30, 2013				March 31, 2015				December 31, 2014				March 31, 2014
$ in millions	Impact of CIP		Consolidated Total		Impact of CIP		Consolidated Total		Impact of CIP		Consolidated Total		Impact of CIP		Consolidated Total		Impact of CIP		Consolidated Total		Impact of CIP		Consolidated Total
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	—		1,196.0		—		1,331.2		—		916.2		—		1,219.7		—		1,514.2		—		978.7
Unsettled fund receivables	—		1,228.8		—		932.4		—		1,058.7		—		1,361.5		—		732.4		—		1,510.6
Accounts receivable	(2.8	)	517.8		(3.4	)	500.8		(5.9	)	457.6		(4.1	)	561.1		(3.8	)	545.9		(2.6	)	530.7
Investments	(63.6	)	919.1		(55.3	)	839.7		(92.8	)	723.4		(88.7	)	951.6		(94.9	)	885.4		(66.6	)	868.7
Assets of CSIP	—		326.8		—		108.5		—		—		—		314.2		—		305.8		—		275.8
Assets of CIP:
Cash and cash equivalents of CIP	292.4		292.4		583.6		583.6		360.6		360.6		393.9		393.9		404.0		404.0		780.0		780.0
Accounts receivable of CIP	121.7		121.7		58.3		58.3		140.4		140.4		82.1		82.1		161.3		161.3		183.7		183.7
Investments of CIP	4,971.4		4,971.4		4,734.7		4,734.7		4,531.3		4,531.3		6,198.0		6,198.0		5,762.8		5,762.8		5,173.7		5,173.7
Assets held for policyholders	—		1,539.9		—		1,416.0		—		1,229.4		—		2,572.7		—		1,697.9		—		1,342.0
Prepaid assets	—		108.2		—		101.4		—		102.1		—		126.5		—		132.1		—		101.5
Other assets	—		144.2		—		182.1		—		178.7		—		90.7		—		92.0		—		187.4
Property and equipment, net	—		354.8		—		350.8		—		328.8
Property, equipment and software, net													—		393.1		—		402.6		—		342.4
Intangible assets, net	—		1,258.3		—		1,263.7		—		1,270.4		—		1,362.8		—		1,246.7		—		1,260.6
Goodwill	—		6,920.1		—		6,867.3		—		6,739.8		—		6,333.3		—		6,579.4		—		6,810.5
Total assets	5,319.1		19,899.5		5,317.9		19,270.5		4,933.6		18,138.6		6,581.2		21,961.2		6,229.4		20,462.5		6,068.2		20,346.3
LIABILITIES
Accrued compensation and benefits	—		463.2		—		676.4		—		442.5		—		371.7		—		667.3		—		391.3
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	—		755.6		—		763.1		—		594.2		—		824.5		—		757.3		—		734.0
Liabilities of CIP:
Debt of CIP	4,301.5		4,301.5		4,181.7		4,181.7		4,044.3		4,044.3		5,479.7		5,479.7		5,149.6		5,149.6		4,762.7		4,762.7
Other liabilities of CIP	201.0		201.0		461.8		461.8		208.2		208.2		320.7		320.7		280.9		280.9		621.8		621.8
Policyholder payables	—		1,539.9		—		1,416.0		—		1,229.4		—		2,572.7		—		1,697.9		—		1,342.0
Unsettled fund payables	—		1,219.6		—		882.0		—		1,060.1		—		1,363.2		—		730.1		—		1,508.4
Long-term debt	—		1,588.9		—		1,588.6		—		1,445.6		—		1,600.6		—		1,589.3		—		1,588.7
Deferred tax liabilities, net	—		351.9		—		323.6		—		360.3		—		387.7		—		304.8		—		390.0
Total liabilities	4,502.5		10,421.6		4,643.5		10,293.2		4,252.5		9,384.6		5,800.4		12,920.8		5,430.5		11,177.2		5,384.5		11,338.9
TEMPORARY EQUITY
Redeemable noncontrolling interests in CSIP	—		155.0		—		—		—		—		—		167.6		—		165.5		—		101.9
PERMANENT EQUITY
Equity attributable to common shareholders:
Equity attributable to Invesco Ltd.:
Common shares	—		98.1		—		98.1		—		98.1		—		98.1		—		98.1		—		98.1
Additional paid-in-capital	—		6,068.8		—		6,100.8		—		6,046.2		—		6,091.2		—		6,133.6		—		6,044.3
Treasury shares	—		(1,807.5	)	—		(1,700.4	)	—		(1,369.4	)	—		(1,936.2	)	—		(1,898.1	)	—		(1,768.3	)
Retained earnings	15.8		3,617.1		12.5		3,361.9		20.7		3,047.7		12.1		4,077.5		20.3		3,926.0		17.8		3,451.7
Retained earnings appropriated for investors in CIP	63.3		63.3		104.3		104.3		98.0		98.0		—		—		17.6		17.6		74.0		74.0
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	(15.7	)	509.9		(12.7	)	427.9		(25.0	)	243.9
Total equity attributable to common shareholders	63.4		8,549.7		104.1		8,392.6		93.7		8,164.5
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax													(12.1	)	(253.6	)	(20.2	)	48.8		(17.8	)	379.9
Total equity attributable to Invesco Ltd.													—		8,077.0		17.7		8,326.0		74.0		8,279.7
Equity attributable to nonredeemable noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	753.2		773.2		570.3		584.7		587.4		589.5		780.8		795.8		781.2		793.8		609.7		625.8
Total permanent equity	816.6		9,322.9		674.4		8,977.3		681.1		8,754.0		780.8		8,872.8		798.9		9,119.8		683.7		8,905.5
Total liabilities, temporary and permanent equity	5,319.1		19,899.5		5,317.9		19,270.5		4,933.6		18,138.6		6,581.2		21,961.2		6,229.4		20,462.5		6,068.2		20,346.3

Table of Contents

Cash and cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents decreased by ~~$135.2~~$294.5 million from ~~$1,331.2~~$1,514.2 million at December 31, ~~2013~~2014 to ~~$1,196.0~~$1,219.7 million at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015. See “Cash Flows” in the following section within this Management's Discussion and Analysis for additional discussion regarding the movements in cash flows during the period.

~~Table of Contents~~

Unsettled fund receivables and payables

Unsettled fund receivables increased by ~~$296.4~~$629.1 million from ~~$932.4~~$732.4 million at December 31, ~~2013~~2014 to ~~$1,228.8~~$1,361.5 million at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, due primarily to higher transaction activity between funds and investors in late ~~June~~March ~~2014~~2015 when compared to late December ~~2013~~2014 in our UITs, together with U.K. and cross-border funds. In the company's capacity as sponsor of UITs, the company records receivables from brokers, dealers, and clearing organizations for unsettled sell trades of securities and UITs in addition to receivables from customers for unsettled sell trades of UITs. In our U.K. and cross-border operations, unsettled fund receivables are created by the normal settlement periods on transactions initiated by certain clients. The presentation of the unsettled fund receivables and substantially offsetting payables (~~$1,219.6~~($1,363.2 million at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 up from ~~$882.0~~$730.1 million at December 31, ~~2013)~~2014) at trade date reflects the legal relationship between the underlying investor and the company.

Investments

As of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 we had ~~$919.1~~$951.6 million in total investments (December 31, ~~2013: $839.7~~2014: $885.4 million). Included in investments are ~~$283.3~~$346.4 million of seed money investments in affiliated funds used to seed funds as we launch new products, and ~~$246.9~~$179.2 million of investments related to assets held for deferred compensation plans, which are also held primarily in affiliated funds. Seed investments increased by ~~$49.5~~$32.0 million during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, primarily due to seed money funding and positive market activity, partially offset by the redemption of seed money. Investments related to deferred compensation awards ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$2.8~~$16.6 million during the period, primarily due to ~~redemptions of~~additional investments in affiliated funds to hedge economically new employee plan awards, partially offset by ~~new purchases~~redemptions of investments.

Included in investments are ~~$313.2~~$335.1 million in equity method investments in our Chinese and Indian joint ventures and in certain of the company’s private equity partnerships, real estate partnerships and other co-investments (December 31, ~~2013:~~ ~~$308.2 million~~)2014: $332.1 million). The increase of ~~$5.0~~$3.0 million in equity method investments was primarily driven by an increase of ~~$10.6~~$7.0 million in in our ~~partnership~~joint venture investments ~~due to capital calls in co-investments~~resulting from $6.1 million of ~~$24.8 million, including $23.8 million into real estate funds, $12.7~~current period earnings and $0.9 million due to ~~earnings~~increase in funding and ~~valuation adjustments and $0.4 million due to positive~~ foreign exchange rate movement. ~~The increases in partnership investments were offset by distributions and capital returns of $27.3 million during the period.~~ The remaining change in equity method investments is due to ~~a $5.6 million~~ decrease in our ~~joint venture~~partnership investments resulting from ~~$18.3~~distributions and capital returns of $15.4 million, ~~of dividends earned, partially offset by an increase in funding of $2.0~~including $13.1 million ~~current period earning of $10.4 million~~related to real estate funds, and ~~an increase of $0.3 million due to~~negative foreign exchange rate ~~movement.~~movement of $0.4 million. The decreases in partnership investments were offset by capital calls in co-investments of $5.0 million and earnings and valuation adjustments of $6.8 million during the period.

Assets of CSIP

Assets of Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products (CSIP) consist of cash, investments and other assets of consolidated sponsored investment products in which Invesco holds the majority of the voting rights or partnerships in which the company has substantive equity at risk but in which the other investors lack removal or liquidation rights. At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, CSIP assets include ~~$306.4~~$286.1 million in investments (December 31, ~~2013: $93.2~~2014: $288.5 million), ~~$13.7~~$20.2 million in cash and cash equivalents (December 31, ~~2013: $12.7~~2014: $11.4 million), and ~~$6.7~~$7.9 million in accounts receivable and other assets (December 31, ~~2013: $2.6~~2014: $5.9 million). The increase in CSIP investments is primarily driven by new invested cash in the underlying funds and reflects the deployment of invested cash into fund investments. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements, ~~Note~~ 1~~, "Accounting Policies," and~~ Note 12, "Consolidated Sponsored Investment Products," for additional information.

Assets held for policyholders and policyholder payables

One of our subsidiaries, Invesco Perpetual Life Limited, is an insurance company that was established to facilitate retirement savings plans in the U.K. The entity holds assets that are managed for its clients on its balance sheet with an equal and offsetting liability. The increase in the balance of these accounts from ~~$1,416.0~~$1,697.9 million at December 31, ~~2013~~2014 to ~~$1,539.9~~$2,572.7 million at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 was the result of new business and flows of $857.2 million and an increase in the market values of these assets and liabilities ~~and increases in~~of $106.5; partially offset by a decrease of $88.9 million due to foreign exchange rate movements.

Intangible assets, net

Intangible assets reflect a net ~~decrease~~increase of ~~$5.4~~$116.1 million from ~~$1,263.7~~$1,246.7 million at December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, to ~~$1,258.3~~$1,362.8 million at ~~June 30, 2014~~.March 31, 2015. The ~~decrease~~ inincrease is principally due to the acquisition of certain management contract intangible assets ~~net is due to amortization of $7.2 million, partially~~during the three months ending March 31, 2015 partly offset by ~~positive~~amortization and foreign exchange ~~movements~~movements.

Table of ~~$1.8 million.~~Contents

Goodwill

Goodwill ~~increased~~decreased from ~~$6,867.3~~$6,579.4 million at December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, to ~~$6,920.1~~$6,333.3 million at ~~June 30, 2014~~.March 31, 2015. The ~~increase~~decrease is principally due to foreign exchange movements of ~~$52.8~~$247.7 million. The company's annual goodwill impairment review is performed as of October 1 of each year.

~~Table of Contents~~

Long-term debt

Long-term debt increased from ~~$1,588.6~~$1,589.3 million at December 31, ~~2013,~~2014, to ~~$1,588.9~~$1,600.6 million at ~~June 30, 2014~~, March 31, 2015, an increase of $~~0.3~~$11.3 million related principally to a draw of $11.2 million on the company's floating rate credit facility. The remaining increase represents the amortization of the difference between public offering price and the par value of senior notes that will be paid on maturity.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our capital structure, together with available cash balances, cash flows generated from operations, existing capacity under our credit facility and further capital market activities, if necessary, should provide us with sufficient resources to meet present and future cash needs, including operating, debt and other obligations as they come due and anticipated future capital requirements.

Our capital management priorities have evolved with the growth and success of our business and include:

•reinvestment in the business;

•moderate annual growth of dividends (as further discussed in the "Dividends" section below);

•share repurchase; and

•establishment of an approximate $1 billion cash buffer in excess of regulatory requirements.

During the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 we repurchased ~~1.3 million and 4.9~~2.0 million common shares in the open market at a cost of ~~$50.0 million and $169.6 million, respectively.~~$76.6 million.

These priorities are executed in a manner consistent with our desire to maintain a strong, investment-grade credit rating. As of the filing of this Report, Invesco held credit ratings of ~~A-/Positive~~A/Stable and ~~A3/~~A2/Stable from Standard & Poor's Ratings Services ("S&P") and Moody's Investors Service respectively. Furthermore, S&P considers our risk management to be strong. S&P rates companies' enterprise risk management capabilities on a scale of Fair, Adequate, Strong, and Excellent. Our ability to continue to access the capital markets in a timely manner depends on a number of factors, including our credit ratings, the condition of the global economy, investors’ willingness to purchase our securities, interest rates, credit spreads and the valuation levels of equity markets. If we are unable to access capital markets in a timely manner, our business could be adversely impacted.

Certain of our subsidiaries are required to maintain minimum levels of capital. Such requirements may change from time-to-time as additional guidance is released based on a variety of factors, including balance sheet composition, assessment of risk exposures and governance, and review from regulators. These and other similar provisions of applicable law may have the effect of limiting withdrawals of capital, repayment of intercompany loans and payment of dividends by such entities. ~~A sub-group of Invesco subsidiaries, including all~~All of our regulated EU subsidiaries isare subject to consolidated capital requirements under ~~applicable European Union (EU) directives,~~EU Directives, including those arising from the Capital Requirements Directive IV (CRD IV) and the United Kingdom's Internal Capital Adequacy Assessment Process (ICAAP), and capital is maintained within this sub-group to satisfy these regulations. These requirements mandate the retention of liquid resources, ~~in those jurisdictions,~~ which we meet in part by holding cash and cash equivalents. This retained cash can be used for general business purposes in the European sub-group or in the countries where it is located. Due to the capital restrictions, the ability to transfer cash between certain jurisdictions may be limited. In addition, transfers of cash between international jurisdictions may have adverse tax consequences. At ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, the European sub-group had cash and cash equivalent balances of ~~$777.5~~$989.7 million (December 31, ~~2013: $632.3~~2014: $937.6 million). We are in compliance with all regulatory minimum net capital requirements. As of ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, the company's minimum regulatory capital requirement was ~~$287.8~~$398.0 million. The total amount of non-U.S. cash and cash equivalents was ~~$901.3~~$1,070.8 million at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 (December 31, ~~2013: $740.5~~2014: $1,109.4 million).

In addition, the company is required to hold cash deposits with clearing organizations or to otherwise segregate cash to maintain compliance with federal and other regulations in connection with its UIT broker dealer entity. At ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, these cash deposits totaled ~~$11.4~~$11.3 million (December 31, ~~2013: $11.3~~2014: $11.4 million).

The consolidation of ~~$4.7~~$5.9 billion and ~~$4.4~~$5.6 billion of total assets and long-term debt of certain CLO products as of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, respectively, did not impact the company’s liquidity and capital resources. The collateral assets of the CLOs are held solely to satisfy the obligations of the CLOs. The company has no right to the benefits from, nor does it bear the risks associated with, the collateral assets held by the CLOs, beyond the company’s minimal direct investments in, and management

Table of Contents

and performance fees generated from, these products, which are eliminated upon consolidation. If the company were to liquidate, the collateral assets would not be available to the general creditors of the company, and as a result, the company does not consider them to be company assets. Likewise, if the CLOs were to liquidate, their investors would have no recourse to the general credit of the company. The company therefore does not consider this debt to be an obligation of the company. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements - Note 13,, “Consolidated Investment Products,” for additional details.

~~Table of Contents~~

Selected balance sheet information is reflected in the table below:


	Excluding CIP (Non-GAAP) ⁽¹⁾						Including CIP (U.S. GAAP)						Excluding CIP (Non-GAAP) ⁽¹⁾						Including CIP (U.S. GAAP)
$ in millions	June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013		June 30, 2013		June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013		June 30, 2013		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		March 31, 2014		March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014		March 31, 2014
Cash and cash equivalents	1,196.0		1,331.2		916.2		1,196.0		1,331.2		916.2		1,219.7		1,514.2		978.7		1,219.7		1,514.2		978.7
Investments of CIP	—		—		—		4,971.4		4,734.7		4,531.3		—		—		—		6,198.0		5,762.8		5,173.7
Total assets ⁽¹⁾	14,580.4		13,952.6		13,205.0		19,899.5		19,270.5		18,138.6		15,380.0		14,233.1		14,278.1		21,961.2		20,462.5		20,346.3

Long-term debt	1,588.9		1,588.6		1,445.6		1,588.9		1,588.6		1,445.6		1,600.6		1,589.3		1,588.7		1,600.6		1,589.3		1,588.7
Long-term debt of CIP	—		—		—		4,301.5		4,181.7		4,044.3		—		—		—		5,479.7		5,149.6		4,762.7
Long-term debt / Long-term debt plus CIP debt	1,588.9		1,588.6		1,445.6		5,890.4		5,770.3		5,489.9		1,600.6		1,589.3		1,588.7		7,080.3		6,738.9		6,351.4

Total liabilities ⁽¹⁾	5,919.1		5,649.7		5,132.1		10,421.6		10,293.2		9,384.6		7,120.4		5,746.7		5,954.4		12,920.8		11,177.2		11,338.9

Total permanent equity ⁽¹⁾	8,506.3		8,302.9		8,072.9		9,322.9		8,977.3		8,754.0		8,092.0		8,320.9		8,221.8		8,872.8		9,119.8		8,905.5

Debt/Equity % ^(1,2)	18.7	%	19.1	%	17.9	%	63.2	%	64.3	%	62.7	%	19.8	%	19.1	%	19.3	%	79.8	%	73.9	%	71.3	%

____________

(1)

The balance sheet line items excluding CIP are non-GAAP financial measures. To calculate total assets excluding CIP at ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, use U.S. GAAP total assets of ~~$19,899.5~~$21,961.2 million (December 31, ~~2013: $19,270.5~~2014: $20,462.5 million; ~~June 30, 2013: $18,138.6~~March 31, 2014: $20,346.3 million) and subtract total assets of CIP of ~~$5,319.1~~$6,581.2 million (December 31, ~~2013: $5,317.9~~2014: $6,229.4 million; ~~June 30, 2013: $4,933.6~~March 31, 2014: $6,068.2 million). To calculate total liabilities excluding CIP at ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, use U.S. GAAP total liabilities of ~~$10,421.6~~$12,920.8 million (December 31, ~~2013: $10,293.2~~2014: $11,177.2 million; ~~June 30, 2013: $9,384.6~~March 31, 2014: $11,338.9 million) and subtract total liabilities of CIP of ~~$4,502.5~~$5,800.4 million (December 31, ~~2013: $4,643.5~~2014: $5,430.5 million, ~~June 30, 2013: $4,252.5~~March 31, 2014: $5,384.5 million). To calculate total permanent equity excluding CIP at ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, use U.S. GAAP total permanent equity of ~~$9,322.9~~$8,872.8 million (December 31, ~~2013: $8,977.3~~2014: $9,119.8 million; ~~June 30, 2013: $8,754.0~~March 31, 2014: $8,905.5 million) and subtract total permanent equity of CIP of ~~$816.6~~$780.8 million (December 31, ~~2013: $674.4~~2014: $798.9 million; ~~June 30, 2013: $681.1~~March 31, 2014: $683.7 million). See the "Balance Sheet Discussion" section for a fully expanded balance sheet illustrating the impact of consolidation of investment products for ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, December 31, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~June 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014.

(2)

The debt-to-equity ratio excluding CIP is a non-GAAP financial measure. The debt-to-equity ratio is calculated as long-term debt divided by total permanent equity for the balance sheet excluding CIP and long-term debt plus long-term debt of CIP divided by total permanent equity for the balance sheet including CIP. Management believes that it is important to illustrate for users of our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements that calculating a balance sheet measure, such as the debt-to-equity ratio, including the impact of CIP causes the company to appear far more indebted than is the case. As disclosed above, the debt of CIP is not the company's debt, nor do the noteholders of the CIP debt have any recourse to the company.

Cash Flows Discussion

The ability to consistently generate free cash flow from operations in excess of dividend payments, share repurchases, capital expenditures, and ongoing operating expenses is one of our company's fundamental financial strengths. Operations continue to be financed from current earnings and borrowings. Our principal uses of cash, other than for operating expenses, include dividend payments, capital expenditures, acquisitions, purchase of our shares in the open market and investments in certain new investment products.

Cash flows of CIP (discussed in Item 1, Financial Statements - Note 13,, “Consolidated Investment Products”) are reflected in Invesco's cash provided by or used in operating activities, investing activities and financing activities. Cash held by CIP is not

Table of Contents

available for general use by Invesco, nor is Invesco cash available for general use by its CIP. Accordingly, the table below presents the consolidated total cash flows of the company and separately presents the impact to the cash flows from CIP. The impact is illustrated in the tables immediately below by a column which shows the dollar-value change in the consolidated figures, as caused by the consolidation of CIP. For example, the impact of CIP on net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 reflects ~~a provision~~cash used of ~~cash of $236.6~~$9.3 million; however, this was not ~~a provision~~used as part of the company's corporate cash balances. Excluding the impact of CIP, cash ~~provided by~~used in operations was ~~$313.7~~

~~Table of Contents~~

$47.0 million during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~.March 31, 2015. Also as illustrated in the table below, the sum of the operating, investing and financing cash flows of CIP offsets to a zero impact to the company's change in cash and cash equivalent balances from period to period. The cash flows of CIP do not form part of the company’s cash flow management processes, nor do they form part of the company’s significant liquidity evaluations and decisions for the reasons noted. The discussion that follows the table focuses on the company’s cash flows.

Table of Contents

Summary of Cash Flow Statement Impact of CIP


	Six months ended June 30, 2014				Six months ended June 30, 2013				Three months ended March 31, 2015				Three months ended March 31, 2014
$ in millions	Impact of CIP		Invesco Ltd. Consolidated		Impact of CIP		Invesco Ltd. Consolidated		Impact of CIP		Invesco Ltd. Consolidated		Impact of CIP		Invesco Ltd. Consolidated
Operating activities:
Net income	58.1		523.6		(19.5	)	403.3		12.2		284.0		21.4		206.8
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities:
Amortization and depreciation	—		45.8		—		44.2		—		22.7		—		23.4
Share-based compensation expense	—		70.0		—		69.4		—		40.7		—		36.5
(Gain)/loss on disposal of business, property and equipment, net	—		—		—		0.5		—		—		—		—
Other (gains)/losses, net	4.7		(22.8	)	—		(18.1	)	2.7		(2.7	)	—		(6.6	)
Other (gains)/losses of CSIP, net	—		(11.5	)	—		—		—		(6.4	)	—		(6.5	)
Other (gains)/losses of CIP, net	(63.3	)	(63.3	)	22.7		22.7		(24.4	)	(24.4	)	(26.5	)	(26.5	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	3.4		(15.5	)	1.3		(15.0	)	1.7		(11.8	)	1.2		(10.0	)
Dividends from unconsolidated affiliates	—		15.4		—		1.9		—		0.7		—		0.8
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase)/decrease in cash held by CIP	260.1		260.1		(76.0	)	(76.0	)	9.4		9.4		(196.4	)	(196.4	)
(Increase)/decrease in cash held by CSIP	—		(1.0	)	—		—		—		(8.8	)	—		0.3
(Purchase)/sale of trading investments, net	—		(10.4	)	—		0.6		—		(39.5	)	—		7.8
(Increase)/decrease in receivables	(17.0	)	(402.7	)	4.9		(711.9	)	(14.7	)	(1,632.9	)	(0.5	)	(520.9	)
Increase/(decrease) in payables	(9.4	)	162.6		33.5		534.0		3.8		1,312.7		5.1		272.1
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities	236.6		550.3		(33.1	)	255.6		(9.3	)	(56.3	)	(195.7	)	(219.2	)
Investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment	—		(49.8	)	—		(40.3	)
Purchase of property, equipment and software									—		(23.0	)	—		(21.4	)
Purchase of available-for-sale investments	33.7		(112.5	)	6.6		(25.2	)	27.1		(34.3	)	32.2		(1.8	)
Sale of available-for-sale investments	(37.5	)	75.1		(3.1	)	23.0		(29.7	)	9.8		(26.5	)	10.3
Purchase of investments by CIP	(2,848.8	)	(2,848.8	)	(2,504.3	)	(2,504.3	)	(1,286.6	)	(1,286.6	)	(1,325.1	)	(1,325.1	)
Sale of investments by CIP	2,108.5		2,108.5		2,584.6		2,584.6		960.6		960.6		970.1		970.1
Purchase of investments by CSIP	—		(476.1	)	—		—		—		(159.1	)	—		(246.9	)
Sale of investments by CSIP	—		274.3		—		—		—		166.7		—		95.3
Purchase of other investments	2.2		(67.5	)	—		(164.6	)	—		(51.9	)	—		(44.1	)
Sale of other investments	—		40.3		—		39.7		—		36.6		—		15.3
Returns of capital and distributions from unconsolidated partnership investments	(2.0	)	25.9		(1.8	)	9.9		—		14.7		(0.4	)	3.8
Acquisition earn-out payments	—		—		—		(1.2	)
Sale of business	—		60.8		—		—
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities	(743.9	)	(969.8	)	82.0		(78.4	)	(328.6	)	(366.5	)	(349.7	)	(544.5	)
Financing activities:
Proceeds from exercises of share options	—		5.2		—		10.8		—		0.7		—		1.5
Purchases of treasury shares	—		(169.6	)	—		(120.5	)	—		(76.6	)	—		(119.6	)
Dividends paid	—		(207.1	)	—		(178.4	)	—		(108.1	)	—		(98.0	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation	—		17.6		—		16.7		—		13.0		—		13.9
Repayment on unsettled fund account	—		(35.7	)	—		—
Repayment of unsettled fund account									—		—		—		(35.7	)
Third-party capital invested into CIP	155.8		155.8		34.5		34.5		12.9		12.9		40.1		40.1
Third-party capital distributed by CIP	(68.0	)	(68.0	)	(128.1	)	(128.1	)	(33.9	)	(33.9	)	(48.6	)	(48.6	)
Third-party capital invested into CSIP	—		152.5		—		—		—		0.8		—		100.8
Third-party capital distributed by CSIP	—		(1.4	)	—		—
Borrowings of debt by CIP	715.0		715.0		409.4		409.4		935.9		935.9		715.0		715.0
Repayments of debt by CIP	(295.5	)	(295.5	)	(364.7	)	(364.7	)	(577.0	)	(577.0	)	(161.1	)	(161.1	)
Net borrowings/(repayments) under credit facility	—		—		—		259.5		—		11.2		—		—
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities	507.3		268.8		(48.9	)	(60.8	)	337.9		178.9		545.4		408.3
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	—		(150.7	)	—		116.4		—		(243.9	)	—		(355.4	)
Foreign exchange movement on cash and cash equivalents	—		15.5		—		(35.7	)	—		(50.6	)	—		2.9
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	—		1,331.2		—		835.5		—		1,514.2		—		1,331.2
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	—		1,196.0		—		916.2		—		1,219.7		—		978.7

~~Table of Contents~~

Operating Activities

Operating cash flows include the receipt of investment management and other fees generated from AUM, offset by operating expenses and changes in operating assets and liabilities. Although some receipts and payments are seasonal, particularly bonus payments, in general, after allowing for the change in cash held by CIP, CSIP and trading investment activities, our operating cash flows move in the same direction as our operating income.

During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, cash ~~provided by~~used in operating activities ~~increased $294.7~~decreased $162.9 million to ~~$550.3~~$56.3 million from ~~$255.6~~$219.2 million during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014. As shown in the tables above, the impact of CIP to cash ~~provided by~~used in operating activities was ~~$236.6 million of cash provided during the six months ended June 30, 2014 compared to $33.1~~$9.3 million of cash used during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2015 compared to $195.7

Table of Contents

million of cash used during the three months ended March 31, 2014. Excluding the impact of CIP, cash ~~provided by~~used in operations was ~~$313.7~~$47.0 million during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 compared to ~~$288.7~~$23.5 million of cash ~~provided by~~used in operating activities during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2013.~~March 31, 2014.

Net income during the three months ended March 31, 2015 includes $6.4 million of gains from CSIP investments (three months ended March 31, 2014: $6.5 million) that are adjusted out in arriving at cash provided by operations. The changes in operating assets and liabilities also impact the link between cash provided by operations and net income. Excluding the impact of CIP, the ~~increase in cash provided by operations in 2014 correlates with the increase~~changes in operating ~~income,~~assets and liabilities utilized $357.6 million of cash in the three months ended March 31, 2015, as compared to utilizing $245.3 million in the same period in ~~2013. Cash~~2014, reducing cash provided by ~~or used in~~ operating activities by a net $112.3 million. This includes ~~seasonal~~a $47.3 million increase in net purchases of trading investments, $9.1 million of increased cash held by CSIP investments, and $19.1 million of additional payroll payments related to annual staff bonus, related payroll taxes, payroll taxes on annual share award vestings, and annual retirement plan ~~contributions which were comparable between the periods. In addition, there~~contributions. There were no significant non-cash items that impacted the comparison between the periods of operating income to net cash provided by operations.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities totaled ~~$969.8~~$366.5 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013:~~March 31, 2014: net cash used in ~~$78.4~~$544.5 million). As shown in the tables above, the impact of CIP on investing activities, including investment purchases, sales and returns of capital, was ~~$743.9~~$328.6 million used ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $82.0~~March 31, 2014: $349.7 million ~~contributed)~~used). Excluding the impact of CIP cash flows, net cash used in investing activities was ~~$225.9~~$37.9 million ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013:~~March 31, 2014: net cash used of ~~$160.4~~$194.8 million).

For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~,March 31, 2015, excluding the impact of CIP, cash outflows include purchases of investments by CSIP of ~~$476.1~~$159.1 million ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: none)~~March 31, 2014: $246.9 million) and available-for-sale and other investments of ~~$215.9~~$113.3 million ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $196.4~~March 31, 2014: $78.1 million). These outflows were partially offset by collected proceeds of ~~$274.3~~$166.7 million from sales of investments by CSIP ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: none), $180.8~~March 31, 2014: $95.3 million) and $90.8 million from sales and returns of capital of available-for-sale and other investments ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $77.5~~March 31, 2014: $56.3 million)~~, and $60.8 million received during the second quarter 2014 as part of the final consideration for the sale of the Atlantic Trust business on December 31, 2013.~~.

During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 the company had capital expenditures of ~~$49.8~~$23.0 million ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $40.3~~March 31, 2014: $21.4 million). Our capital expenditures related principally in each period to technology initiatives, including enhancements to platforms from which we maintain our portfolio management systems and fund accounting systems, improvements in computer hardware and software desktop products for employees, new telecommunications products to enhance our internal information flow, and back-up disaster recovery systems. Also, in each period, a portion of these costs related to leasehold improvements made to the various buildings and workspaces used in our offices. These projects have been funded with proceeds from our operating cash flows.

Financing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities totaled ~~$268.8~~$178.9 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013:~~March 31, 2014: net cash ~~used~~provided of ~~$60.8~~$408.3 million). As shown in the tables above, the impact of CIP on financing activities provided cash of ~~$507.3~~$337.9 million ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013:~~March 31, 2014: cash ~~used~~provided of ~~$48.9~~$545.4 million). Excluding the impact of the CIP, financing activities used cash of ~~$238.5~~$159.0 million in the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~ ~~(six~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013:~~March 31, 2014: cash used of ~~$11.9~~$137.1 million).

Financing cash outflows during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 included ~~$207.1~~$108.1 million of dividend payments for the dividends declared in January ~~and April (six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013:~~March 31, 2014: dividends paid of ~~$178.4~~$98.0 million) and the purchase of treasury shares through market transactions totaling ~~$169.6~~$76.6 million ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $120.5~~March 31, 2014: $119.6 million).

Other financing cash inflows include a credit facility borrowing during the three months ended March 31, 2015 of $11.2 million (three months ended March 31, 2014: zero), net cash of ~~$151.1~~$0.8 million invested into CSIP by third-party investors ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: none)~~March 31, 2014: $100.8 million), cash received from the exercise of options of ~~$5.2~~$0.7 million ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $10.8~~March 31, 2014: $1.5 million), and excess tax benefits from share-based compensation of ~~$17.6~~$13.0 million ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $16.7~~March 31, 2014: $13.9 million). ~~The six months ended June 30, 2013 also included net cash inflows from net borrowings under the credit facility of $259.5 million.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Dividends

Invesco declares and pays dividends on a quarterly basis in arrears. On ~~July 31, 2014~~April 30, 2015, the company declared a ~~second~~first quarter ~~2014~~2015 cash dividend of ~~25.0~~27.0 cents per share to holders of common shares, which will be paid on ~~September~~June 5, ~~2014~~2015, to shareholders of record as of ~~August 21, 2014~~May 15, 2015 with an ex-dividend date of ~~August 19, 2014.~~May 13, 2015.

The declaration, payment and amount of any future dividends will be declared by our board of directors and will depend upon, among other factors, our earnings, financial condition and capital requirements at the time such declaration and payment

Table of Contents

are considered. The board has a policy of managing dividends in a prudent fashion, with due consideration given to profit levels, overall debt levels, and historical dividend payouts.

Share Repurchase Plan

During the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~,March 31, 2015, the company repurchased ~~1.3~~2.0 million ~~and 4.9 million shares, respectively,~~ in the market at a cost of ~~$50.0 million~~ ~~and $169.6~~$76.6 million (three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~2.2 million~~ ~~and 3.8~~March 31, 2014: 3.6 million shares at a cost of ~~$75.5~~$119.6 million ~~and $120.5 million, respectively).~~). Separately, an aggregate of ~~1.9~~1.6 million shares were withheld on vesting events during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 to meet employees' withholding tax obligations ~~(six~~(three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~2.2 million~~)March 31, 2014: 1.7 million). The fair value of these shares withheld at the respective withholding dates was ~~$62.3~~$58.3 million ~~(six~~ (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$57.7 million~~)March 31, 2014: $56.7 million). Approximately ~~$1,326.8~~$1,150.3 million remained authorized under the company's share repurchase plan at ~~June 30,~~March 31, 2015. In October 2013, the company's board of directors authorized an additional $1.5 billion for the existing share repurchase program with no stated expiration date. As of March 31, 2014, (~~June 30, 2013~~: ~~$346.5~~ $1,376.8 million). remained under the previous authorization.

Long-term debt

Our long-term debt at ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 was $~~1,588.9~~$1,600.6 million (December 31, ~~2013: $1,588.6 million~~)2014: $1,589.3 million) and was comprised of the following:


$ in millions	June 30, 2014	December 31, 2013	March 31, 2015	December 31, 2014
Unsecured Senior Notes:
$600 million 3.125% - due November 30, 2022	599.6	599.6	599.6	599.6
$600 million 4.000% - due January 30, 2024	596.0	595.8	596.3	596.2
$400 million 5.375% - due November 30, 2043	393.3	393.2	393.5	393.5
Floating rate credit facility expiring December 17, 2018			11.2	—
Long-term debt	1,588.9	1,588.6	1,600.6	1,589.3

For the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, the company's weighted average cost of debt was 4.01% ~~(six~~ (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013~~March 31, 2014: ~~2.09%~~4.00%).

The company's $1.25 billion unsecured credit facility expires on December 17, 2018. Financial covenants under the credit agreement include: (i) the quarterly maintenance of a debt/EBITDA leverage ratio, as defined in the credit agreement, of not greater than 3.25:1.00, (ii) a coverage ratio (EBITDA, as defined in the credit agreement/interest payable for the four consecutive fiscal quarters ended before the date of determination) of not less than 4.00:1.00. As of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, we were in compliance with our financial covenants. At ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, our leverage ratio was ~~0.98~~:0.93:1.00 (December 31, ~~2013: 1.05:~~2014: 0.98:1.00), and our interest coverage ratio was ~~26.96~~:24.16:1.00 (December 31, ~~2013: 35.49:~~2014: 22.74:1.00).

~~Table of Contents~~

The ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, coverage ratio calculations are as follows:


$ millions	Total			Q2 2014		Q1 2014		Q4 2013		Q3 2013		Total			Q1 2015	Q4 2014		Q3 2014		Q2 2014
Net income attributable to common shareholders	977.8			274.5		187.8		287.4		228.1
Net (income)/loss attributable to common shareholders arising from CIP	5.0			2.0		(5.3	)	(1.1	)	9.4
Net income attributable to Invesco Ltd.												1,059.9			259.6	269.8		256.0		274.5
Net (income)/loss attributable to Invesco Ltd. arising from CIP												5.7			8.2	(2.1	)	(2.4	)	2.0
Tax expense	398.7			107.1		87.8		111.7		92.1		402.2			101.3	99.3		94.5		107.1
Amortization/depreciation/impairment	101.7			22.4		23.4		34.1		21.8		88.7			22.7	22.0		21.6		22.4
Interest expense	61.8			18.2		18.7		15.2		9.7		73.1			18.7	18.1		18.1		18.2
Share-based compensation expense	133.7			33.5		36.5		30.1		33.6		142.2			40.7	33.7		34.3		33.5
Unrealized gains and losses from investments, net*	(12.5		)	(4.8	)	(0.3	)	(3.7	)	(3.7	)	(5.6		)	1.4	(4.1	)	1.9		(4.8	)
EBITDA**	1,666.2			452.9		348.6		473.7		391.0		1,766.2			452.6	436.7		424.0		452.9
Adjusted debt**		$1,625.0											$1,640.6
Leverage ratio (Debt/EBITDA - maximum 3.25:1.00)	0.98											0.93
Interest coverage (EBITDA/Interest Expense - minimum 4.00:1.00)	26.96											24.16

____________


*	Adjustments for unrealized gains and losses from investments, as defined in our credit facility, may also include non-cash gains and losses on investments to the extent that they do not represent anticipated future cash receipts or expenditures.

EBITDA and Adjusted debt are non-GAAP financial measures; however management does not use these measures for anything other than these debt covenant calculations. The calculation of EBITDA above (a reconciliation from net income attributable to common shareholders) is defined by our credit agreement, and therefore net income attributable to common shareholders is the most appropriate GAAP measure from which to reconcile to EBITDA. The calculation of Adjusted debt is defined in our credit facility and equals total debt of ~~$1,588.9~~

Table of Contents

attributable to Invesco Ltd.) is defined by our credit agreement, and therefore net income attributable to Invesco Ltd. is the most appropriate GAAP measure from which to reconcile to EBITDA. The calculation of Adjusted debt is defined in our credit facility and equals total debt of $1,600.6 million plus $40.0 million ~~plus~~ ~~$36.1 million~~ in letters of credit.

The discussion that follows identifies risks associated with the company's liquidity and capital resources. The Executive Overview of this Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations section contains a broader discussion of the company's overall approach to risk management.

Credit and Liquidity Risk

Capital management involves the management of the company's liquidity and cash flows. The company manages its capital by reviewing annual and projected cash flow forecasts and by monitoring credit, liquidity and market risks, such as interest rate and foreign currency risks (as discussed in Part I, Item 3, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk”), through measurement and analysis. The company is primarily exposed to credit risk through its cash and cash equivalent deposits, which are held by external firms. The company invests its cash balances in its own institutional money market products, as well as with external high credit-quality financial institutions. These arrangements create exposure to concentrations of credit risk.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk that one party to a financial instrument will cause a financial loss for the other party by failing to discharge an obligation. ~~The company is subject to credit risk in the following areas of its business:~~

All cash and cash equivalent balances are subject to credit risk, as they represent deposits made by the company with external banks and other institutions. As of ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, our maximum exposure to credit risk related to our cash and cash equivalent balances is ~~$1,196.0 million~~.$1,219.7 million. See Item 1, Financial Statements - Note 14,, “Related Parties,” for information regarding cash and cash equivalents invested in affiliated money market funds.

~~Certain subsidiaries of the company accept deposits and place deposits with other institutions on behalf of our customers. As of~~ ~~June 30, 2014, our exposure to credit risk related to these transactions is $2.9 million.~~

The company does not utilize credit derivatives or similar instruments to mitigate the maximum exposure to credit risk. The company does not expect any counterparties to its financial instruments to fail to meet their obligations.

~~Table of Contents~~

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that the company will encounter difficulty in meeting obligations associated with its financial liabilities. The company is exposed to liquidity risk through its ~~$1,588.9~~$1,600.6 million in ~~total~~long-term debt. The company actively manages liquidity risk by preparing cash flow forecasts for future periods, reviewing them regularly with senior management, maintaining a committed credit facility, scheduling significant gaps between major debt maturities and engaging external financing sources in regular dialog.

Effects of Inflation

Inflation can impact our organization primarily in two ways. First, inflationary pressures can result in increases in our cost structure, especially to the extent that large expense components such as compensation are impacted. To the degree that these expense increases are not recoverable or cannot be counterbalanced through pricing increases due to the competitive environment, our profitability could be negatively impacted. Secondly, the value of the assets that we manage may be negatively impacted when inflationary expectations result in a rising interest rate environment. Declines in the values of these AUM could lead to reduced revenues as management fees are generally calculated based upon the size of AUM.

Off Balance Sheet Commitments

See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements - Note 11,, “Commitments and Contingencies - Off Balance Sheet Commitments,” for more information regarding undrawn capital ~~commitments and support agreements.~~commitments.

Contractual Obligations

We have future obligations under various contracts relating to debt and interest payments, financing and operating leases, long-term defined benefit pension and post-retirement medical plans, and acquisition contracts. During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015, there were no material changes to the company's contractual obligations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no significant changes to the accounting policies that we believe are the most critical to an understanding of our results of operations and financial condition, which are disclosed in our most recent Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014.

Recent Accounting Standards

See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements - Note 1, “Accounting Policies - Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted and Pending Accounting Pronouncements.”

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

In the normal course of its business, the company is primarily exposed to market risk in the form of AUM market price risk, securities market risk, interest rate risk, and foreign exchange rate risk. There have not been any material changes to the company's exposures to market risks during the period ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 that would require an update to the disclosures provided in the most recent Form 10-K.

AUM Market Price Risk

The company's investment management revenues are comprised of fees based on the value of AUM. Declines in the market prices of equity and fixed income securities, commodities and derivatives, or other similar financial instruments held in client portfolios could cause revenues to decline because of lower investment management fees by:

Causing the value of AUM to decrease.

Causing the returns realized on AUM to decrease (impacting performance fees).

Causing clients to withdraw funds in favor of investments in markets that they perceive to offer greater opportunity and that the company does not serve.

Causing clients to rebalance assets away from investments that the company manages into investments that the company does not manage.

Causing clients to reallocate assets away from products that earn higher revenues into products that earn lower revenues.

Underperformance of client accounts relative to competing products could exacerbate these factors.

~~Table of Contents~~

��

Securities Market Risk

The company has investments in managed investment products that invest in a variety of asset classes. Investments are generally made to establish a track record for a new fund or investment vehicle or to hedge economically exposure to certain deferred compensation plans. The company's exposure to market risk from financial instruments measured at fair value arises from its investments.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk relates to the risk that the fair value of future cash flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes in market interest rates. The company is exposed to interest rate risk primarily through its external debt and cash and cash equivalent investments. On ~~June 30, 2014,~~March 31, 2015, the interest rates on ~~100.0%~~99.3% of the company's borrowings were fixed for a weighted average period of ~~14.1~~13.3 years, and the company had a ~~zero~~$11.2 million balance on its floating rate credit facility.

Foreign Exchange Rate Risk

The company has transactional currency exposures that occur when any of the company’s subsidiaries receive or pay cash in a currency different from its functional currency. Such exposure arises from sales or purchases by operating subsidiaries in currencies other than the subsidiaries’ functional currencies. These exposures are not actively managed.

The company also has certain investments in foreign operations, whose net assets and results of operations are exposed to foreign currency translation risk when translated into U.S. dollars upon consolidation into Invesco Ltd. In January 2015 the company entered into a series of out-of-the money put option contracts to hedge economically approximately 75% of the foreign currency risk on the translation of its Pound Sterling-denominated earnings into U.S. Dollars for 2015. The ~~company generally does not~~economic hedge ~~these exposures.~~is predominantly triggered upon the impact of a decline in the Pound Sterling/U.S. Dollar foreign exchange rate below $1.493, which could arise as a result of European economic uncertainty. See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements - Note 2, “Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities,” for additional details.

The company is exposed to foreign exchange revaluation into the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income on monetary assets and liabilities that are held by subsidiaries in different functional currencies than the subsidiaries' functional currencies. Net foreign exchange revaluation ~~losses~~gains were ~~$1.2~~$1.8 million in the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014 (six~~March 31, 2015 (three months ended ~~June 30, 2013: $1.5~~March 31, 2014: $0.4 million of ~~losses)~~gains), and are included in general and administrative expenses and other gains and losses, net on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. We continue to monitor our exposure to foreign exchange revaluation.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Table of Contents

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information the company is required to disclose in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We have evaluated, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~June 30, 2014.~~March 31, 2015. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We have evaluated any change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~June 30, 2014~~March 31, 2015 and have concluded that there was no change that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

9273

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

See Part I, Item I, Note 11, "Commitments and Contingencies - Legal Proceedings," for information regarding legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The company has had no significant changes in its risk factors from those previously disclosed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Repurchases of Equity Securities

The following table sets forth information regarding purchases of our common shares by us and any affiliated purchases during the three months ended ~~June 30, 2014:~~March 31, 2015:

Month
Total Number of Shares Purchased⁽¹⁾
Average Price Paid Per Share
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans or Programs⁽²⁾

Maximum Number at end of period (or Approximate
Dollar Value) of Shares
that May Yet Be Purchased
Under the Plans
or Programs⁽²⁾ (millions)
April 1-30, 2014 3,289
$ 36.35
—
1,376.8
May 1-31, 2014 762,801
$ 36.01
690,200
1,352.0
June 1-30, 2014 752,116
$ 37.57
670,700
1,326.8
Total 1,518,206
1,360,900



Month	Total Number of Shares Purchased⁽¹⁾	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs⁽²⁾	Maximum Number at end of period (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs⁽²⁾ (millions)
January 1-31, 2015	681,951	$	37.07	674,102	1,201.8
February 1-28, 2015	2,132,929	$	40.07	595,200	1,178.3
March 1-31, 2015	772,102	$	40.57	689,200	1,150.3
Total	3,586,982			1,958,502


(1)	An aggregate of ~~157,306~~1,628,480 shares were surrendered to us by Invesco employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations or loan repayments in connection with the vesting of equity awards.


(2)	OnIn October ~~11,~~ 2013, ~~the company's~~our board of directors authorized ~~an additional~~a $1.5 billion ~~for the existing~~ share repurchase program of our common shares with no stated expiration date. As of ~~June 30, 2014, $1,326.8~~March 31, 2015, $1,150.3 million remained authorized under this plan

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

Item 5. Other Information

None

9374

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit Index

~~(Note: References herein to “AMVESCAP,” or “AMVESCAP PLC” are to the predecessor registrant to Invesco Ltd.)~~



3.1	Memorandum of Association of Invesco Ltd., incorporating amendments up to and including December 4, 2007, incorporated by reference to exhibit 3.1 to Invesco’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 12, 2007
3.2	Second Amended and Restated Bye-Laws of Invesco Ltd., incorporating amendments up to and including May 15, 2014, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Invesco’s Quarterly Report of Form 10-Q, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 31, 2014
31.1	Certification of Martin L. Flanagan pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Loren M. Starr pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Martin L. Flanagan pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to ~~Section��~~Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2	Certification of Loren M. Starr pursuant to Rule 13a-14(b) and 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

9475

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	INVESCO LTD.
~~July 31, 2014~~April 30, 2015	/s/ MARTIN L. FLANAGAN
	Martin L. Flanagan
	President and Chief Executive Officer

~~July 31, 2014~~April 30, 2015	/s/ LOREN M. STARR
	Loren M. Starr
	Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

9576



	For the three months ended June 30, 2013			For the six months ended June 30, 2013
$ in millions	Proceeds from Sales	Gross Realized Gains	Gross Realized Losses	Proceeds from Sales	Gross Realized Gains	Gross Realized Losses
Seed money	—	—	—	22.9	1.7	(0.3	)
CLOs	—	—	—	0.1	—	—



	For the six months ended June 30, 2014			For the six months ended June 30, 2013
Millions of shares, except prices	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price (£ Sterling)	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price (£ Sterling)
Outstanding at the beginning of period	1.1		7.32	2.6		7.31
Exercised during the period	(0.4	)	6.74	(0.9	)	7.27
Outstanding at the end of the period	0.7		7.64	1.7		7.33
Exercisable at the end of the period	0.7		7.64	1.7		7.33



	Three months ended June 30 , 2013
$ in millions	CLOs - VIEs		Other VIEs		VOEs		Adjustments⁽¹⁾		Impact of CIP
Total operating revenues	—		—		0.4		(9.4	)	(9.0	)
Total operating expenses	17.0		0.2		1.5		(9.4	)	9.3
Operating income	(17.0	)	(0.2	)	(1.1	)	—		(18.3	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	—		—		—		(0.8	)	(0.8	)
Interest and dividend income	—		—		—		(1.8	)	(1.8	)
Interest and dividend income of CIP	53.1		—		—		(2.4	)	50.7
Interest expense of CIP	(34.8	)	—		—		4.2		(30.6	)
Other gains/ (losses) of CIP, net	(10.7	)	0.5		12.6		(4.0	)	(1.6	)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes	(9.4	)	0.3		11.5		(4.8	)	(2.4	)
Income tax provision	—		—		—		—		—
Income from continuing operations, net of income taxes	(9.4	)	0.3		11.5		(4.8	)	(2.4	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	—		—		—		—		—
Net income	(9.4	)	0.3		11.5		(4.8	)	(2.4	)
Net (income)/loss attributable to noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities	9.4		(0.3	)	(10.2	)	—		(1.1	)
Net income attributable to common shareholders	—		—		1.3		(4.8	)	(3.5	)