UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED:

~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010

Commission file number:

1-14527

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		22-3263609
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

477 Martinsville Road

Post Office Box 830

Liberty Corner, New Jersey 07938-0830

(908) 604-3000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,

of registrant’s principal executive office)

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~registrant:~~registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate ~~website,~~Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ~~(§232.405 of this chapter)~~ during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer		Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer	X	Smaller reporting company
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

	Number of Shares Outstanding
Class	At ~~November~~May 1, ~~2009~~2010
Common Shares, $0.01 par value		1,000

The Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H (1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H of Form 10-Q.

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

Table of Contents

Form 10-Q

Page

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.~~

~~Table of Contents~~ ~~Form 10-Q~~
				~~Page~~
~~PART I~~

~~FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~

Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 (unaudited) and
		December 31, ~~2008~~2009	1

	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive (Loss) Income ~~(Loss)~~ for
		the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ (unaudited)	2

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity for the three
		~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ (unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended
		~~ended September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ (unaudited)	4

	Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (unaudited)		5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
		Results of Operation	2526

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		4441

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		4441


~~PART II~~

~~OTHER INFORMATION~~

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	4442

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4442

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	44 42

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	44 42

Item 4.	~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~Reserved	44 42

Item 5.	Other Information	45 42

Item 6.	Exhibits	45 42

Table of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	September 30,		December 31,			March 31,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except par value per share)	2009		2008			2010		2009
	(unaudited)					(unaudited)
ASSETS:
Fixed maturities - available for sale, at market value	$	6,363,908	$	5,511,856		$	6,423,902	$	6,463,168
(amortized cost: 2009, $6,090,136; 2008, $5,610,483)
(amortized cost: 2010, $6,210,288; 2009, $6,255,759)
Fixed maturities - available for sale, at fair value		52,815		43,090			65,307		50,528
Equity securities - available for sale, at market value (cost: 2009, $15; 2008, $15)		12		16
Equity securities - available for sale, at market value (cost: 2010, $15; 2009, $15)							12		13
Equity securities - available for sale, at fair value		158,456		119,815			394,548		380,025
Short-term investments		645,096		918,712			250,127		261,438
Other invested assets (cost: 2009, $365,500; 2008, $400,498)		363,205		392,589
Other invested assets (cost: 2010, $398,189; 2009, $387,200)							397,829		386,326
Other invested assets, at fair value		364,841		316,750			406,933		382,639
Cash		125,128		92,264			107,737		107,480
Total investments and cash		8,073,461		7,395,092			8,046,395		8,031,617
Accrued investment income		79,124		82,860			79,327		83,705
Premiums receivable		768,273		714,035			767,884		769,744
Reinsurance receivables - unaffiliated		606,226		637,890			631,814		618,081
Reinsurance receivables - affiliated		2,526,007		2,480,016			2,686,134		2,492,152
Funds held by reinsureds		158,366		147,287			158,154		156,223
Deferred acquisition costs		186,828		192,096			181,444		183,498
Prepaid reinsurance premiums		557,751		456,180			580,923		562,146
Deferred tax asset		290,211		518,042			212,462		210,493
Federal income tax recoverable		13,992		70,299			131,045		135,682
Other assets		121,548		172,825			166,016		136,234
TOTAL ASSETS	$	13,381,787	$	12,866,622		$	13,641,598	$	13,379,575

LIABILITIES:
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses	$	7,246,981	$	7,419,993		$	7,613,758	$	7,300,139
Unearned premium reserve		1,274,240		1,176,834			1,258,574		1,239,320
Funds held under reinsurance treaties		155,096		134,698			179,303		175,257
Losses in the course of payment		49,051		35,805			45,416		42,633
Commission reserves		37,927		45,531			47,027		50,897
Other net payable to reinsurers		479,454		378,800			583,219		444,535
8.75% Senior notes due 3/15/2010		199,931		199,821			-		199,970
5.4% Senior notes due 10/15/2014		249,759		249,728			249,780		249,769
6.6% Long term notes due 05/01/2067		238,347		399,643			238,349		238,348
Junior subordinated debt securities payable		329,897		329,897			329,897		329,897
Accrued interest on debt and borrowings		12,821		11,217			12,092		9,885
Unsettled securities payable		45,915		1,476
Other liabilities		231,856		280,211			257,318		240,151
Total liabilities		10,551,275		10,663,654			10,814,733		10,520,801

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)

STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY:
Common stock, par value: $0.01; 3,000 shares authorized;
1,000 shares issued and outstanding (2009 and 2008)		-		-
1,000 shares issued and outstanding (2010 and 2009)							-		-
Additional paid-in capital		319,887		315,771			322,459		321,185
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of deferred income tax expense of
$105.7 million at 2009 and tax benefit of $38.8 million at 2008		197,560		(72,063	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of deferred income tax expense of
$96.2 million at 2010 and $89.9 million at 2009							178,724		166,978
Retained earnings		2,313,065		1,959,260			2,325,682		2,370,611
Total stockholder's equity		2,830,512		2,202,968			2,826,865		2,858,774
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY	$	13,381,787	$	12,866,622		$	13,641,598	$	13,379,575

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME ~~(LOSS)~~

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,						March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
	(unaudited)					(unaudited)						(unaudited)
REVENUES:
Premiums earned	$	438,320	$	449,892		$	1,337,539		$	1,421,336		$	414,134		$	438,445
Net investment income		65,492		97,305			179,667			292,263			85,107			39,659
Net realized capital gains (losses):
Net realized capital losses:
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities		-		(63,793	)		(5,510	)		(67,854	)		-			(574	)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities
transferred to other comprehensive income		-		-			-			-			-			-
Other net realized capital gains (losses)		101,394		(44,859	)		61,661			(193,493	)
Total net realized capital gains (losses)		101,394		(108,652	)		56,151			(261,347	)
Other net realized capital losses													(5,307	)		(67,610	)
Total net realized capital losses													(5,307	)		(68,184	)
Realized gain on debt repurchase		-		-			78,271			-			-			78,271
Other income (expense)		15,081		7,951			7,801			(16,039	)		5,112			(114	)
Total revenues		620,287		446,496			1,659,429			1,436,213			499,046			488,077

CLAIMS AND EXPENSES:
Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses		241,992		446,996			777,295			1,115,813			427,004			289,195
Commission, brokerage, taxes and fees		77,259		73,816			252,401			295,270			67,841			88,219
Other underwriting expenses		39,864		32,769			109,226			95,794			32,714			31,308
Corporate expenses													2,226			1,318
Interest, fee and bond issue cost amortization expense		17,073		19,745			53,779			59,233			16,340			19,633
Total claims and expenses		376,188		573,326			1,192,701			1,566,110			546,125			429,673

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES		244,099		(126,830	)		466,728			(129,897	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		79,958		(47,931	)		128,423			(69,290	)
(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE TAXES													(47,079	)		58,404
Income tax (benefit) expense													(2,150	)		12,740

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	164,141	$	(78,899	)	$	338,305		$	(60,607	)
NET (LOSS) INCOME												$	(44,929	)	$	45,664

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		162,343		(145,996	)		285,123			(223,813	)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax													11,746			38,480

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)	$	326,484	$	(224,895	)	$	623,428		$	(284,420	)
COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME												$	(33,183	)	$	84,144

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY

		Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
		September 30,					September 30,						March 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)		2009		2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
		(unaudited)					(unaudited)						(unaudited)
COMMON STOCK (shares outstanding):
Balance, beginning of period			1,000		1,000			1,000			1,000			1,000			1,000
Balance, end of period			1,000		1,000			1,000			1,000			1,000			1,000

ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL:
Balance, beginning of period		$	318,492	$	312,924		$	315,771		$	310,206		$	321,185		$	315,771
Share-based compensation plans			1,395		1,671			4,116			4,389			1,274			1,262
Balance, end of period			319,887		314,595			319,887			314,595			322,459			317,033

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS),
NET OF DEFERRED INCOME TAXES:
Balance, beginning of period			35,217		85,459			(72,063	)		163,276			166,978			(72,063	)
Cumulative adjustment of initial adoption(1), net of tax			-		-			(15,500	)		-
Net increase (decrease) during the period			162,343		(145,996	)		285,123			(223,813	)
Net increase during the period														11,746			38,480
Balance, end of period			197,560		(60,537	)		197,560			(60,537	)		178,724			(33,583	)

RETAINED EARNINGS:
Balance, beginning of period			2,148,924		2,112,309			1,959,260			2,094,017			2,370,611			1,959,260
Cumulative adjustment of initial adoption(1), net of tax			-		-			15,500			-
Net income (loss)			164,141		(78,899	)		338,305			(60,607	)
Net (loss) income														(44,929	)		45,664
Balance, end of period			2,313,065		2,033,410			2,313,065			2,033,410			2,325,682			2,004,924

TOTAL STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY, END OF PERIOD		$	2,830,512	$	2,287,468		$	2,830,512		$	2,287,468		$	2,826,865		$	2,288,374

(1) The cumulative adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of deferred income taxes and retained earnings represents the effect of initially adopting ASC 320-10-65-1
(FASB Staff Position No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, "Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments").

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.	The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)						(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)	$	164,141		$	(78,899	)	$	338,305		$	(60,607	)
Net (loss) income													$	(44,929	)	$	45,664
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
(Increase) decrease in premiums receivable		(1,371	)		(3,405	)		(51,192	)		45,932
Decrease (increase) in funds held by reinsureds, net		9,624			(221	)		9,459			(1,237	)
Decrease (increase) in reinsurance receivables		146,809			(48,135	)		(6,656	)		(118,746	)
Decrease (increase) in deferred tax asset		41,994			61,482			74,970			(30,155	)
(Decrease) increase in reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses		(35,920	)		194,584			(218,365	)		154,284
Decrease in premiums receivable														3,330			11,328
Decrease in funds held by reinsureds, net														2,210			506
Increase in reinsurance receivables														(209,177	)		(52,970	)
(Increase) decrease in deferred tax asset														(8,294	)		33,904
Increase (decrease) in reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses														303,114			(48,536	)
Increase (decrease) in unearned premiums		95,297			7,476			91,611			(134,529	)		17,379			(879	)
Change in equity adjustments in limited partnerships		4,423			6,167			36,548			(9,095	)		(9,414	)		34,093
Change in other assets and liabilities, net		(161,038	)		(79,464	)		83,477			(12,364	)		107,975			1,107
Non-cash compensation expense		1,384			1,201			4,091			3,834			1,195			1,262
Amortization of bond premium		3,824			3,141			8,802			5,809			3,546			2,271
Amortization of underwriting discount on senior notes		48			45			142			133			42			46
Realized gain on debt repurchase		-			-			(78,271	)		-			-			(78,271	)
Net realized capital (gains) losses		(101,394	)		108,652			(56,151	)		261,347
Net realized capital losses														5,307			68,184
Net cash provided by operating activities		167,821			172,624			236,770			104,606			172,284			17,709

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from fixed maturities matured/called - available for sale, at market value		130,349			106,558			324,432			370,220			172,263			109,235
Proceeds from fixed maturities matured/called - available for sale, at fair value		-			-			5,570			-			-			5,570
Proceeds from fixed maturities sold - available for sale, at market value		34,602			52,180			87,696			138,326			165,485			44,778
Proceeds from fixed maturities sold - available for sale, at fair value		4,010			-			12,012			-			2,497			3,492
Proceeds from equity securities sold - available for sale, at market value		23,028			-			23,028			-
Proceeds from equity securities sold - available for sale, at fair value		11,310			151,801			23,535			380,856			21,342			1,634
Distributions from other invested assets		4,448			30,035			24,573			41,246			8,165			12,293
Cost of fixed maturities acquired - available for sale, at market value		(256,130	)		(64,455	)		(865,910	)		(1,343,983	)		(275,526	)		(261,238	)
Cost of fixed maturities acquired - available for sale, at fair value		(2,548	)		(11,444	)		(19,101	)		(11,444	)		(14,194	)		(13,310	)
Cost of equity securities acquired - available for sale, at fair value		(12,948	)		(115,399	)		(32,244	)		(156,363	)		(20,739	)		(8,976	)
Cost of other invested assets acquired		(9,780	)		(35,804	)		(26,122	)		(55,908	)		(9,740	)		(2,562	)
Cost of other invested assets acquired, at fair value		-			(25,007	)		-			(150,745	)		(47,032	)		-
Net change in short-term securities		(86,179	)		(197,914	)		284,738			687,541
Net change in short-term investments														12,085			188,866
Net change in unsettled securities transactions		18,522			(58,944	)		42,856			(64,654	)		16,323			1,646
Net cash used in investing activities		(141,316	)		(168,393	)		(114,937	)		(164,908	)
Net cash provided by investing activities														30,929			81,428

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Tax benefit from share-based compensation		11			469			25			554			79			-
Net cost of senior notes maturing														(200,000	)		-
Net cost of debt repurchase		-			-			(83,026	)		-			-			(83,026	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		11			469			(83,001	)		554
Net cash used in financing activities														(199,921	)		(83,026	)

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH		3,411			(8,130	)		(5,968	)		13,772			(3,035	)		(12,767	)

Net increase (decrease) in cash		29,927			(3,430	)		32,864			(45,976	)
Net increase in cash														257			3,344
Cash, beginning of period		95,201			103,901			92,264			146,447			107,480			92,264
Cash, end of period	$	125,128		$	100,471		$	125,128		$	100,471		$	107,737		$	95,608

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash transactions:
Income taxes recovered	$	(18,847	)	$	(107,359	)	$	(2,488	)	$	(49,014	)
Income taxes paid													$	3,766		$	3,146
Interest paid	$	13,892		$	13,887		$	51,464		$	52,861			13,899			17,808

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~

1. ~~General~~GENERAL

As used in this document, “Holdings” means Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc., a Delaware ~~Company~~company and direct subsidiary of Everest Underwriting Group (Ireland) Limited (“Holdings Ireland”); “Group” means Everest Re Group, Ltd. (Holdings Ireland’s parent); “Bermuda Re” means Everest Reinsurance (Bermuda), Ltd., a subsidiary of Group; “Everest Re” means Everest Reinsurance Company and its subsidiaries, a subsidiary of Holdings ~~and its subsidiaries~~ (unless the context otherwise requires); and the “Company” means Holdings and its subsidiaries.

2. ~~Basis of Presentation~~BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the results on an interim basis. Certain financial information, which is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), has been omitted since it is not required for interim reporting purposes. The December 31, ~~2008~~2009 consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ are not necessarily ~~indicative~~indicat ive of the results for a full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2009, 2008 ~~2007~~ and ~~2006~~2007 included in the Company’s most recent Form 10-K filing.

All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Certain reclassifications and format changes have been made to prior years’ amounts to conform to the 2010 presentation.

Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Codification

Financial Accounting Standards Board Launched Accounting ~~Codification~~

~~The~~Codification. In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~FASB Statement No. 168, “The~~ ~~FASB Accounting Standards Codification~~TM ~~and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. This~~authoritative guidance ~~establishes~~establishing the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (“Codification” ~~or “ASC”~~) as the single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by ~~nongovernmental~~non-governmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other ~~non-grandfathered,~~no n-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative.

Following the Codification, the FASB will ~~not~~no longer issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification.

GAAP is not intended to be changed as a result of the FASB’s Codification, but it will change the way the guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes will have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in the accounting policies for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company’s adoption of this guidance impacts the way the Company references U.S. GAAP accounting standards in the financial statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

Application of Recently Issued Accounting Standard Changes

Subsequent Events. In May 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for subsequent events, which was later modified in February 2010, that addresses the accounting for and disclosure of subsequent events not addressed in other applicable U.S. GAAP. The Company implemented the new disclosure requirement beginning with the second quarter of 2009 and included it in the Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.

Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements. In January 2010, the FASB amended the authoritative guidance for disclosures on fair value measurements. Effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, the guidance requires a new separate disclosure for: significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 and the reasons for the transfers; and provided clarification on existing disclosures to include: fair value measurement disclosures by class of assets and liabilities and disclosure on valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. Effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010, the guidance requires another new separate disclosure in regards to Level 3 fair value measurements in that, the period activity will present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. Comparative disclosures shall be required only for periods ending after initial adoption. The Company has implemented the first part of this guidance effective January 1, 2010.

Interim Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments. In April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for disclosures about fair value of financial instruments. This new guidance requires quarterly disclosures on the qualitative and quantitative information about the fair value of all financial instruments including methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value during the period. These disclosures were previously only done annually. The Company adopted this disclosure beginning with the second quarter of 2009 and included it in the Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Investment Securities. In April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments. This new guidance amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities and expands the financial statement disclosures for other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities. For available for sale debt securities that the Company has no intent to sell and more likely than not will not be required to sell prior to recovery, only the credit loss component of the impairment would be recognized in earnings, while the rest of the fair value loss would be recognized in accumulated ot her comprehensive income. The Company adopted this guidance effective April 1, 2009. Upon adoption the Company recognized a cumulative-effect adjustment increase in retained earnings and decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) of $15.5 million, net of $8.3 million of tax.

Measurement of Fair Value in Inactive Markets. ~~ASC 820-10-65-4 (FSP No. FAS 157-4 “Determining Fair Value When~~In April 2009, the ~~Volume~~FASB revised the authoritative guidance for fair value measurements and ~~Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly”)~~disclosures, which reaffirms that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. It also reaffirms the need to use judgment in determining if a formerly active market has become inactive and in determining fair values when the market has become inactive. There was no impact to the Company’s financial statements upon adoption.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Investment Securities.~~ ~~ASC 320-10-65-1~~ (FSP No. FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2 “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments”) amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities and expands the financial statement disclosures for other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities. For available for sale debt securities that the Company has no intent to sell and more likely than not will not be required to sell prior to recovery, only the credit loss component of the impairment would be recognized in earnings, while the rest of the fair value loss would be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Company adopted ASC 320-10-65-1 guidance effective April 1, 2009. Upon adoption the Company recognized a $15.5 million cumulative-effect adjustment from retained earnings, net of $8.3 million of tax.

~~Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments.~~ ASC 825-10-65-1 (FSP FAS 107-1 and FSP APB 28-1 “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments”) requires quarterly disclosures on the qualitative and quantitative information about the fair value of all financial instruments including methods and significant assumptions used to estimate fair value during the period. These disclosures were previously only done annually. The Company included these disclosures in the second quarter 2009 Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.

~~Subsequent Events Disclosures.~~ ASC 855-10-50 (FAS 165 “Subsequent Events”) requires a disclosure as to the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated as well as whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued. The Company included this disclosure in its second quarter 2009 Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.

~~Future Accounting Standard Changes~~

~~Fair Value Disclosures about Pension Plan Assets.~~ ASC 715-20-65-2 (FSP FAS 132(R)-1 “Employers’ Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets”) requires that information about plan assets be disclosed, on an annual basis, based on the fair value disclosure requirements of ASC 820-10. The Company will be required to separate plan assets into the three fair value hierarchy levels and provide a roll forward of the changes in fair value of plan assets classified as Level 3 in the 2009 annual consolidated financial statements. These disclosures have no effect on the Company’s accounting for plan benefits and obligations.

Table of Contents

3. ~~Investments~~INVESTMENTS

The amortized cost, market value and gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of available for sale, fixed maturity and equity security investments, carried at market value, are as follows for the periods indicated:

	At September 30, 2009									At March 31, 2010
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Appreciation		Depreciation			Value		Cost		Appreciation		Depreciation			Value
Fixed maturity securities - available for sale
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	128,645	$	6,000	$	(195	)	$	134,450	$	135,763	$	3,515	$	(1,972	)	$	137,306
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		3,747,780		231,278		(12,632	)		3,966,426		3,657,459		168,621		(22,244	)		3,803,836
Corporate securities		605,130		30,468		(19,554	)		616,044		644,008		36,228		(7,650	)		672,586
Asset-backed securities		17,646		545		(2,710	)		15,481		16,612		489		(1,971	)		15,130
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		23,019		4,737		(114	)		27,642		32,255		6,515		-			38,770
Agency residential		418,666		12,495		(6	)		431,155		431,587		12,770		(30	)		444,327
Non-agency residential		61,545		773		(11,465	)		50,853		60,544		908		(1,763	)		59,689
Foreign government securities		595,855		32,203		(3,809	)		624,249		673,814		25,368		(9,389	)		689,793
Foreign corporate securities		491,850		18,263		(12,505	)		497,608		558,246		16,967		(12,748	)		562,465
Total fixed maturity securities	$	6,090,136	$	336,762	$	(62,990	)	$	6,363,908	$	6,210,288	$	271,381	$	(57,767	)	$	6,423,902
Equity securities	$	15	$	-	$	(3	)	$	12	$	15	$	-	$	(3	)	$	12

	At December 31, 2009
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Appreciation		Depreciation			Value
Fixed maturity securities - available for sale
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	132,348	$	3,614	$	(1,671	)	$	134,291
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		3,694,267		183,848		(24,256	)		3,853,859
Corporate securities		618,507		30,298		(13,424	)		635,381
Asset-backed securities		16,597		460		(1,909	)		15,148
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		24,213		4,956		(111	)		29,058
Agency residential		556,032		10,366		(1,691	)		564,707
Non-agency residential		61,098		916		(7,055	)		54,959
Foreign government securities		638,204		27,700		(6,687	)		659,217
Foreign corporate securities		514,493		17,184		(15,129	)		516,548
Total fixed maturity securities	$	6,255,759	$	279,342	$	(71,933	)	$	6,463,168
Equity securities	$	15	$	-	$	(2	)	$	13

At December 31, 2008
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
(Dollars in thousands) Cost Appreciation Depreciation Value
Fixed maturity securities - available for sale
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations $ 139,776 $ 15,456 $ - $ 155,232
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions 3,846,754 113,885 (164,921 ) 3,795,718
Corporate securities 482,533 18,404 (64,620 ) 436,317
Asset-backed securities 13,795 7 (4,441 ) 9,361
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial 6,516 - (1,067 ) 5,449
Agency residential 170,299 4,838 (33 ) 175,104
Non-agency residential 54,816 - (18,252 ) 36,564
Foreign government securities 467,935 32,538 (7,776 ) 492,697
Foreign corporate securities 428,059 6,602 (29,247 ) 405,414
Total fixed maturity securities $ 5,610,483 $ 191,730 $ (290,357 ) $ 5,511,856
Equity securities $ 15 $ 1 $ - $ 16

In accordance with ~~ASC 320-10-65-1,~~FASB guidance, the Company reclassified ~~previously~~the non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairments from retained earnings into accumulated other comprehensive ~~income. The~~income, in 2009. At March 31, 2010, the pre-tax ~~amount of this reclassification~~cumulative unrealized appreciation on these corporate securities was ~~$23.8~~$1.0 million ~~all of which were corporate securities. At September 30, 2009, the~~as compared to pre-tax cumulative unrealized depreciation ~~on these securities had improved and the remaining unrealized depreciation for the corporate securities was $3.3 million.~~of $2.0 million at December 31, 2009.

Table of Contents

The amortized cost and market value of fixed ~~maturities~~maturity securities are shown in the following table by contractual maturity. Mortgage-backed securities are generally ~~are~~ more likely to be prepaid than other fixed ~~maturities.~~maturity securities. As the stated maturity of such securities may not be indicative of actual maturities, the totals for mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are shown separately.

	At September 30, 2009				At March 31, 2010				At December 31, 2009
	Amortized		Market		Amortized		Market		Amortized		Market
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Fixed maturity securities – available for sale
Due in one year or less	$	326,465	$	326,275	$	292,804	$	292,765	$	334,054	$	335,948
Due after one year through five years		1,155,583		1,200,003		1,459,842		1,503,714		1,276,968		1,316,918
Due after five years through ten years		1,268,070		1,347,261		1,196,303		1,252,804		1,224,457		1,282,470
Due after ten years		2,819,142		2,965,238		2,720,341		2,816,703		2,762,340		2,863,960
Asset-backed securities		17,646		15,481		16,612		15,130		16,597		15,148
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		23,019		27,642		32,255		38,770		24,213		29,058
Agency residential		418,666		431,155		431,587		444,327		556,032		564,707
Non-agency residential		61,545		50,853		60,544		59,689		61,098		54,959
Total fixed maturity securities	$	6,090,136	$	6,363,908	$	6,210,288	$	6,423,902	$	6,255,759	$	6,463,168

The changes in net unrealized appreciation ~~(depreciation)~~ for the Company’s investments are derived from the following sources for the periods as indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
Increase (decrease) during the period between the market value and cost
Increase during the period between the market value and cost
of investments carried at market value, and deferred taxes thereon:
Fixed maturity securities	$	229,219		$	(207,213	)	$	396,245		$	(326,254	)	$	6,205		$	89,589
Fixed maturity securities ASC 320-10-65-1 adjustment		-			-			(23,846	)		-
Equity securities		-			-			(4	)		-			(1	)		(6	)
Other invested assets		3,387			(2,232	)		5,614			(3,122	)		513			(1,641	)
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation), pre-tax		232,606			(209,445	)		378,009			(329,376	)
Deferred tax (expense) benefit		(81,412	)		73,306			(140,649	)		115,281
Deferred tax benefit ASC 320-10-65-1 adjustment		-			-			8,346			-
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation),
Change in unrealized appreciation, pre-tax														6,717			87,942
Deferred tax expense														(2,351	)		(30,780	)
Change in unrealized appreciation,
net of deferred taxes, included in stockholder's equity	$	151,194		$	(136,139	)	$	245,706		$	(214,095	)	$	4,366		$	57,162

The Company frequently reviews its fixed maturity securities investment portfolio for declines in market value and focuses its attention on securities whose fair value has fallen below 80% of their amortized value at the time of review. The Company then assesses whether the decline in value is temporary or other-than-temporary. In making its assessment, the Company evaluates the current market and interest rate environment as well as specific issuer information. Generally, a change in a security’s value caused by a change in the market or interest rate environment does not constitute an other-than-temporary impairment, but rather a temporary decline in market value. Temporary declines in market value are recorded as unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income. If the Company determines that the decline is other-than-temporary and the Company does not have the intent to sell the security; and it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, the carrying value of the investment is written down to fair value. The fair value adjustment that is credit related is recorded in net realized capital gains (losses) in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income. The fair value adjustment that is non-credit related is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income, net of tax, and is included in accumulated other comprehensive income in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s assessments are based on the issuers current and expected future financial position, timeliness with respect to interest and/or principal payments, speed of repayments and any applicable credit

~~Table of Contents~~

enhancements or breakeven constant default ~~rates~~ra tes on mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, as well as relevant information provided by rating agencies, investment advisors and analysts.

Table of Contents

Retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities. All of the Company’s asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities have a pass-through structure. Each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield. The recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition. Outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities. Conditional prepayment rates, computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities, are used in the calculation of projected and prepayments for pass-through security types.

The tables below display the aggregate market value and gross unrealized depreciation of fixed maturity and equity securities, by security type and contractual maturity, ~~type,~~ in each case subdivided according to ~~the~~ length of time that individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for the periods indicated:

	Duration by security type of unrealized loss at September 30, 2009															Duration by security type of unrealized loss at March 31, 2010
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total					Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross
			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation
Fixed maturity securities - available for sale
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	4,695	$	(195	)	$	-	$	-		$	4,695	$	(195	)	$	45,034	$	(1,962	)	$	515	$	(10	)	$	45,549	$	(1,972	)
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		15,698		(736	)		254,791		(11,896	)		270,489		(12,632	)		556		(6	)		406,437		(22,238	)		406,993		(22,244	)
Corporate securities		59,952		(4,180	)		127,849		(15,374	)		187,801		(19,554	)		36,887		(755	)		58,537		(6,895	)		95,424		(7,650	)
Asset-backed securities		2,558		(200	)		5,235		(2,510	)		7,793		(2,710	)		366		(214	)		8,243		(1,757	)		8,609		(1,971	)
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		-		-			3,274		(114	)		3,274		(114	)
Agency residential		3,680		(6	)		308		-			3,988		(6	)		17,279		(30	)		-		-			17,279		(30	)
Non-agency residential		1,381		(26	)		42,732		(11,439	)		44,113		(11,465	)		-		-			52,369		(1,763	)		52,369		(1,763	)
Foreign government securities		55,494		(3,406	)		32,621		(403	)		88,115		(3,809	)		281,751		(4,040	)		62,240		(5,349	)		343,991		(9,389	)
Foreign corporate securities		135,975		(9,059	)		33,373		(3,446	)		169,348		(12,505	)		205,585		(6,649	)		63,717		(6,099	)		269,302		(12,748	)
Total fixed maturity securities	$	279,433	$	(17,808	)	$	500,183	$	(45,182	)	$	779,616	$	(62,990	)	$	587,458	$	(13,656	)	$	652,058	$	(44,111	)	$	1,239,516	$	(57,767	)
Equity securities																	-		-			12		(3	)		12		(3	)
Total																$	587,458	$	(13,656	)	$	652,070	$	(44,114	)	$	1,239,528	$	(57,770	)

	Duration by maturity of unrealized loss at September 30, 2009															Duration by maturity of unrealized loss at March 31, 2010
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total					Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross
			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation
Fixed maturity securities
Due in one year or less	$	73,180	$	(7,110	)	$	3,690	$	(57	)	$	76,870	$	(7,167	)	$	30,601	$	(2,230	)	$	26,790	$	(3,602	)	$	57,391	$	(5,832	)
Due in one year through five years		116,675		(7,361	)		59,867		(2,139	)		176,542		(9,500	)		363,884		(4,798	)		72,638		(4,267	)		436,522		(9,065	)
Due in five years through ten years		49,142		(1,249	)		52,462		(2,551	)		101,604		(3,800	)		120,359		(2,735	)		48,247		(3,385	)		168,606		(6,120	)
Due after ten years		32,817		(1,856	)		332,615		(26,372	)		365,432		(28,228	)		54,969		(3,649	)		443,771		(29,337	)		498,740		(32,986	)
Asset-backed securities		2,558		(200	)		5,235		(2,510	)		7,793		(2,710	)		366		(214	)		8,243		(1,757	)		8,609		(1,971	)
Mortgage-backed securities		5,061		(32	)		46,314		(11,553	)		51,375		(11,585	)		17,279		(30	)		52,369		(1,763	)		69,648		(1,793	)
Total fixed maturity securities	$	279,433	$	(17,808	)	$	500,183	$	(45,182	)	$	779,616	$	(62,990	)	$	587,458	$	(13,656	)	$	652,058	$	(44,111	)	$	1,239,516	$	(57,767	)
Equity securities																$	-	$	-		$	12	$	(3	)	$	12	$	(3	)

The aggregate market value and gross unrealized losses related to investments in an unrealized loss position as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 were ~~$779.6~~$1,239.5 million and ~~$63.0~~$57.8 million, respectively. There were no unrealized losses on a single security that exceeded ~~0.18%~~0.06% of the market value of the fixed maturity securities at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. In addition, as indicated on the above table, there was no significant concentration of unrealized losses in any one market sector. The ~~$17.8~~$13.7 million of unrealized losses related to fixed maturity securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than one year were generally comprised of highly rated domestic and foreign government ~~municipal,~~and corporate ~~and mortgage-backed~~ securities. Of these unrealized losses, ~~$13.9~~$13.3 million were related to securities that were rated ~~investment~~inves tment grade ~~or better~~ by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The ~~$45.2~~$44.1 million of unrealized losses related to fixed maturity and equity securities in an unrealized loss position for more than one year related primarily to highly rated domestic and foreign government and corporate securities. Of these unrealized losses, $36.9 million

Table of Contents

related to securities in an unrealized loss position for more than one year also related primarily to highly rated municipal, corporate and mortgage-backed securities. Of these unrealized losses, $34.3 million related to securities that were rated investment grade ~~or better~~ by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The non-investment grade securities with unrealized losses are mainly comprised of ~~non-credit other-than-temporary impaired~~municipal and corporate securities. The gross unrealized depreciation greater than 12 months for mortgage-backed securities included $0.2 million related to sub-prime and ~~non-agency residential mortgage-backed securities.~~alt-A loans. In all instances, there were no projected cash flow shortfalls to recover the full book value of the investments and the related interest obligations. ~~The mortgage-backed securities still have excess credit coverage and are current on interest and principal payments.~~ Unrealized losses have decreased since ~~year end~~December 31, 2009, as a result of improved conditions in the overall financial market resulting from increased liquidity and lower interest rates.

The Company, given the size of its investment portfolio and capital position, does not have the intent to sell these securities; and it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. In addition, all securities currently in an unrealized loss position are current with respect to principal and interest payments.

The tables below display the aggregate market value and gross unrealized depreciation of fixed maturity and equity securities, by security type and contractual maturity, ~~type~~ in each case subdivided according to ~~the~~ length of time that individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for the ~~period~~periods indicated:

	Duration by security type of unrealized loss at December 31, 2008																Duration by security type of unrealized loss at December 31, 2009
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total						Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total
			Gross					Gross						Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross
			Unrealized					Unrealized						Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value			Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation
Fixed maturity securities - available for sale
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-	��	$	-		$	44,943	$	(1,671	)	$	-	$	-		$	44,943	$	(1,671	)
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		1,471,807		(146,292	)		176,555		(18,629	)		1,648,362			(164,921	)		559		(4	)		452,018		(24,252	)		452,577		(24,256	)
Corporate securities		189,385		(42,278	)		97,407		(22,342	)		286,792			(64,620	)		45,045		(1,056	)		118,153		(12,368	)		163,198		(13,424	)
Asset-backed securities		4,230		(62	)		3,983		(4,379	)		8,213			(4,441	)		366		(26	)		8,233		(1,883	)		8,599		(1,909	)
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		2,474		(450	)		2,974		(617	)		5,448			(1,067	)		959		(34	)		3,312		(77	)		4,271		(111	)
Agency residential		3,291		(29	)		466		(4	)		3,757			(33	)		213,093		(1,691	)		-		-			213,093		(1,691	)
Non-agency residential		-		-			36,171		(18,252	)		36,171			(18,252	)		1,272		(31	)		47,202		(7,024	)		48,474		(7,055	)
Foreign government securities		79,063		(7,715	)		2,759		(61	)		81,822			(7,776	)		159,493		(2,158	)		69,109		(4,529	)		228,602		(6,687	)
Foreign corporate securities		167,132		(13,702	)		67,537		(15,545	)		234,669			(29,247	)		124,325		(4,205	)		98,772		(10,924	)		223,097		(15,129	)
Total fixed maturity securities	$	1,917,382	$	(210,528	)	$	387,852	$	(79,829	)	$	2,305,234		$	(290,357	)	$	590,055	$	(10,876	)	$	796,799	$	(61,057	)	$	1,386,854	$	(71,933	)
Equity securities																		13		(2	)		-		-			13		(2	)
Total																	$	590,068	$	(10,878	)	$	796,799	$	(61,057	)	$	1,386,867	$	(71,935	)

	Duration by maturity of unrealized loss at December 31, 2008															Duration by maturity of unrealized loss at December 31, 2009
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total					Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross
			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation
Fixed maturity securities
Due in one year or less	$	87,124	$	(8,412	)	$	22,024	$	(1,516	)	$	109,148	$	(9,928	)	$	-	$	-		$	58,010	$	(4,887	)	$	58,010	$	(4,887	)
Due in one year through five years		198,004		(10,813	)		52,705		(5,676	)		250,709		(16,489	)		192,929		(2,975	)		140,349		(9,129	)		333,278		(12,104	)
Due in five years through ten years		145,943		(10,767	)		85,396		(17,662	)		231,339		(28,429	)		137,196		(2,934	)		54,279		(3,401	)		191,475		(6,335	)
Due after ten years		1,476,316		(179,995	)		184,133		(31,723	)		1,660,449		(211,718	)		44,240		(3,185	)		485,414		(34,656	)		529,654		(37,841	)
Asset-backed securities		4,230		(62	)		3,983		(4,379	)		8,213		(4,441	)		366		(26	)		8,233		(1,883	)		8,599		(1,909	)
Mortgage-backed securities		5,765		(479	)		39,611		(18,873	)		45,376		(19,352	)		215,324		(1,756	)		50,514		(7,101	)		265,838		(8,857	)
Total fixed maturity securities	$	1,917,382	$	(210,528	)	$	387,852	$	(79,829	)	$	2,305,234	$	(290,357	)	$	590,055	$	(10,876	)	$	796,799	$	(61,057	)	$	1,386,854	$	(71,933	)
Equity securities																$	13	$	(2	)	$	-	$	-		$	13	$	(2	)

Table of Contents

The aggregate market value and gross unrealized losses related to investments in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, ~~2008~~2009 were ~~$2,305.2~~$1,386.9 million and ~~$290.4~~$71.9 million, respectively. There were no unrealized losses on a single security that exceeded ~~0.35%~~0.11% of the market value of the fixed maturity securities at December 31, ~~2008.~~2009. In addition, as indicated on the above table, there was no significant concentration of unrealized losses in

~~Table of Contents~~

any one market sector. The ~~$210.5~~$10.9 million of unrealized losses related to fixed maturity and equity securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than one year were generally comprised of highly rated ~~municipal,~~government, corporate and mortgage-backed ~~securities with the losses primarily the result of widening credit spreads from the financial markets crisis during the latter part of the year.~~securities. Of these unrealized losses, ~~$206.9~~$10.7 million were related to securities that ~~were~~wer e rated investment grade ~~or better~~ by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The ~~$79.8~~$61.1 million of unrealized losses related to securities in an unrealized loss position for more than one year also related primarily to highly rated municipal, corporate and mortgage-backed ~~securities and were also the result of widening credit spreads during the latter part of the year.~~securities. Of these unrealized losses, ~~$65.2~~$50.5 million related to securities that were rated investment grade ~~or better~~ by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The non-investment grade securities with unrealized losses are mainly comprised of corporate and commercial mortgage-backed securities. The gross unrealized depreciation greater than 12 months for mortgage-backed securities ~~includes~~included only ~~$0.1~~$0.07 million related to sub-prime and alt-A loans. In all instances, there were no projected cash flow shortfalls to recover the full book value of the investments and the related interest obligations. The mortgage-backed securities still had exce ss credit coverage and were current on interest and principal payments. Unrealized losses decreased since December 31, 2008, as a result of improved conditions in the overall financial market resulting from increased liquidity and lower interest rates.

The components of net investment income are presented in the table below for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
Fixed maturity securities	$	70,965		$	81,112		$	212,903		$	233,098		$	73,555		$	70,329
Equity securities		758			1,793			2,182			4,905			2,404			694
Short-term investments and cash		277			4,309			3,331			23,773			77			2,211
Other invested assets
Limited partnerships		(4,423	)		10,148			(36,548	)		29,856			9,414			(34,093	)
Other		664			2,272			5,693			7,242			1,798			2,771
Total gross investment income		68,241			99,634			187,561			298,874			87,248			41,912
Interest credited and other expense		(2,749	)		(2,329	)		(7,894	)		(6,611	)		(2,141	)		(2,253	)
Total net investment income	$	65,492		$	97,305		$	179,667		$	292,263		$	85,107		$	39,659

The Company reports results from limited partnership investments on the equity basis of accounting with changes in value reported through net investment income. Due to the timing of receiving financial information from these partnerships, the results are generally reported on a one month or quarter lag. If the Company determines there has been a significant decline in value of a limited partnership during this lag period, a loss will be recorded in the period in which the Company indentifies the decline.

The Company had contractual commitments to invest up to an additional ~~$145.6~~$132.5 million in limited partnerships at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. These commitments will be funded when called in accordance with the partnership agreements, which have investment periods that expire, unless extended, through 2014.

Table of Contents

The components of net realized capital ~~gains (losses)~~losses are presented in the table below for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
Fixed maturity securities, market value:
Other-than-temporary impairments	$	-		$	(63,793	)	$	(5,510	)	$	(67,854	)	$	-		$	(560	)
Losses from sales		(4,131	)		(12,172	)		(32,612	)		(13,086	)		(777	)		(28,094	)
Fixed maturity securities, fair value:
Gain from sales		172			-			401			-
Gains from sales														83			96
Gains (losses) from fair value adjustments		5,837			(247	)		7,805			(247	)		3,000			(42	)
Equity securities, market value:
Gains from sales		8,041			-			8,041			-
Equity securities, fair value:
Gains (losses) from sales		1,299			(1,061	)		6,483			(12,630	)		1,894			(446	)
Gains (losses) from fair value adjustments		23,075			(58,817	)		23,448			(122,938	)		13,231			(16,923	)
Other invested assets, fair value:
Gains (losses) from fair value adjustments		67,103			27,438			48,091			(44,562	)
Short-term investment (losses) gains		(2	)		-			4			(30	)
Total net realized capital gains (losses)	$	101,394		$	(108,652	)	$	56,151		$	(261,347	)
Losses from fair value adjustments														(22,737	)		(22,215	)
Short-term investment losses														(1	)		-
Total net realized capital losses													$	(5,307	)	$	(68,184	)

Proceeds from the sales of fixed maturity securities for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ were ~~$38.6~~$168.0 million and ~~$52.2~~$48.3 million, respectively. Gross gains of ~~$2.3~~$1.8 million and ~~$0.0~~$1.5 million and gross losses of ~~$6.2~~$2.5 million and ~~$12.2~~$29.6 million were realized on those fixed maturity securities sales for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008,~~ respectively. Proceeds from sales of equity securities for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ were ~~$34.3~~$21.3 million and ~~$151.8~~$1.6 million, respectively. Gross gains of ~~$9.4~~$2.4 million and ~~$3.8~~$0.2 million and gross losses of ~~$0.0~~$0.5 million and ~~$4.8~~$0.7 million were realized on those equity sales for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008,~~ respectively.

Proceeds from sales of fixed maturity securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $99.7 million and $138.3 million, respectively. Gross gains of $4.6 million and $1.1 million and gross losses of $36.8 million and $14.2 million were realized on those fixed maturity securities sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Proceeds from sales of equity securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $46.6 million and $380.9 million, respectively. Gross gains of $15.3 million and $5.9 million and gross losses of $0.7 million and $18.6 million were realized on those equity sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Included in net realized capital gains (losses) was $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and $63.8 million and $67.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively, of write-downs in the value of securities deemed to be impaired on an other-than-temporary basis. There were no write-downs in the value of securities deemed to be impaired on an other-than-temporary basis for the three months ended September 30, 2009.

~~At September 30, 2009 the Company had no other-than-temporary impaired securities where the impairment had both a credit and non-credit component.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~4. Fair Value~~

The Company records fair value re-measurements as net realized capital gains or losses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive ~~income~~ (loss). income. The Company recorded ~~$96.0~~$6.5 million and $79.3 million in net realized capital gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity securities, equity securities and other invested assets, at fair value, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The Company recorded $31.6 million and $167.7$39.2 million in net realized capital losses due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity ~~securities,~~and equity securities and other invested assets, at fair value, for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, respectively.~~March 31, 2010 and 2009.

At March 31, 2010, the Company had no write-downs in the value of securities deemed to be impaired on an other-than-temporary basis included in net realized capital losses. At March 31, 2009, the Company had $0.6 million of write-downs in the value of securities deemed to be impaired on an other-than-temporary basis included in net realized capital losses. The Company had no other-than-temporary impaired securities where the impairment had both a credit and non-credit component.

4. FAIR VALUE

The Company’s fixed maturity and equity securities are managed by third party investment asset managers. The investment asset managers obtain prices from nationally recognized pricing services. These services seek to utilize market data and observations in their evaluation process. They use pricing applications that vary by asset class and incorporate available market information and when fixed maturity securities do not trade on a daily basis the services will apply available information through processes such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. In addition, they use model processes, such as the Option Adjusted Spread model to develop prepayment and interest rate scenarios for securities that have prepayment features.

In limited instances where prices are not provided by pricing services or in rare instances when a manager may not agree with the pricing service, price quotes on a non-binding basis are obtained from investment brokers. The investment asset managers do not make any changes to prices received from either the pricing services or the investment brokers. In addition, the investment asset managers have procedures in place to review the reasonableness of the prices from the service providers and may request verification of the prices. In addition, the Company tests the prices on a random basis to an independent pricing source. In limited situations, where financial markets are inactive or illiquid, the Company may use its own assumptions

Table of Contents

about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value. The Company made no such adjustments at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

Fixed maturity securities are generally categorized as Level 2, Significant Other Observable Inputs, since a particular security may not have traded but the pricing services are able to use valuation models with observable market inputs such as interest rate yield curves and prices for similar fixed maturity securities in terms of issuer, maturity and seniority. Valuations that are derived from techniques in which one or more of the significant inputs are unobservable (including assumptions about risk) are categorized as Level 3, Significant Unobservable Inputs. These securities include broker priced securities and valuation of less liquid securities such as commercial mortgage-backed securities.

Equity securities in U.S. denominated currency are categorized as Level 1, Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets, since the securities are actively traded on an exchange and prices are based on quoted prices from the exchange. Equity securities traded on foreign exchanges are categorized as Level 2 due to potential foreign exchange adjustments to fair or market value.

Other invested assets, at fair value, are categorized as Level 1, Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets, since the securities are shares of the Company’s parent, which are actively traded on an exchange and the price is based on a quoted price.

The following table presents the fair value measurement levels for all assets, which the Company has recorded at fair value (fair and market value) as of the period indicated:

			Fair Value Measurement Using:
			Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Fixed maturities, market value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	137,306	$	-	$	137,306	$	-
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions		3,803,836		-		3,803,836		-
Corporate securities		672,586		-		665,656		6,930
Asset-backed securities		15,130		-		8,762		6,368
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		38,770		-		38,770		-
Agency residential		444,327		-		444,327		-
Non-agency residential		59,689		-		59,233		456
Foreign government securities		689,793		-		689,793		-
Foreign corporate securities		562,465		-		562,465		-
Total fixed maturities, market value		6,423,902		-		6,410,148		13,754

Fixed maturities, fair value		65,307		-		65,307		-
Equity securities, market value		12		12		-		-
Equity securities, fair value		394,548		393,535		1,013		-
Other invested assets, fair value		406,933		406,933		-		-

There were no significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Table of Contents

The following ~~tables present~~table presents the fair value measurement levels for all assets, ~~and liabilities,~~ which the Company has recorded at fair value (fair and market value) as of the ~~periods~~period indicated:

Fair Value Measurement Using:
Quoted Prices
in Active Significant
Markets for Other Significant
Identical Observable Unobservable
Assets Inputs Inputs
(Dollars in thousands) September 30, 2009 (Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
Assets:
Fixed maturities, market value $ 6,363,908 $ - $ 6,351,181 $ 12,727
Fixed maturities, fair value 52,815 - 52,815 -
Equity securities, market value 12 12 - -
Equity securities, fair value 158,456 157,459 997 -
Other invested assets, fair value 364,841 364,841 - -

			Fair Value Measurement Using:								Fair Value Measurement Using:
			Quoted Prices								Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant						in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant				Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable				Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs				Assets		Inputs		Inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2008		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		December 31, 2009		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Fixed maturities, market value	$	5,511,856	$	-	$	5,500,889	$	10,967
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations									$	134,291	$	-	$	134,291	$	-
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions										3,853,859		-		3,853,859		-
Corporate securities										635,381		-		628,451		6,930
Asset-backed securities										15,148		-		8,890		6,258
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial										29,058		-		29,058		-
Agency residential										564,707		-		564,707		-
Non-agency residential										54,959		-		54,533		426
Foreign government securities										659,217		-		659,217		-
Foreign corporate securities										516,548		-		516,548		-
Total fixed maturities, market value										6,463,168		-		6,449,554		13,614

Fixed maturities, fair value		43,090		-		43,090		-		50,528		-		50,528		-
Equity securities, market value		16		16		-		-		13		13		-		-
Equity securities, fair value		119,815		119,092		723		-		380,025		379,058		967		-
Other invested assets, fair value		316,750		316,750		-		-		382,639		382,639		-		-

The following ~~table presents~~tables present the activity under Level 3, fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs for fixed maturity investments, for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						By Asset
	September 30,						September 30,						Corporate		Asset-backed			Non-agency
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008			Securities		Securities			RMBS			Total
Assets:
Balance, beginning of period	$	11,807		$	17,132		$	10,967		$	78,709
Beginning balance January 1, 2010													$	6,930	$	6,258		$	426		$	13,614
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets)		46			(316	)		42			(2,630	)		-		-			25			25
Included in other comprehensive income		1,136			(812	)		1,692			(1,400	)
Included in other comprenhensive income														-		(78	)		41			(37	)
Purchases, issuances and settlements		(113	)		(114	)		(192	)		(5,318	)		-		188			(36	)		152
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3		(149	)		36			218			(53,435	)		-		-			-			-
Balance, end of period	$	12,727		$	15,926		$	12,727		$	15,926
Ending balance March 31, 2010													$	6,930	$	6,368		$	456		$	13,754

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings
(or changes in net assets) attributable to the change in unrealized
gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date	$	-		$	1,302		$	(131	)	$	(2,759	)	$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Table of Contents

	Summary
	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009
Assets:
Balance, beginning of period	$	13,614		$	10,967
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets)		25			(25	)
Included in other comprehensive income		(37	)		181
Purchases, issuances and settlements		152			2,975
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3		-			(6,634	)
Balance, end of period	$	13,754		$	7,464

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings
(or changes in net assets) attributable to the change in unrealized
gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date	$	-		$	(131	)

5. ~~Capital Transactions~~CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS

On December 17, 2008, Group and Holdings renewed their shelf registration statement on Form S-3ASR with the SEC, as a Well Known Seasoned Issuer. This shelf registration statement can be used by Group to register common shares, preferred shares, debt securities, warrants, share purchase contracts and share purchase units; by Holdings to register debt securities and by Everest Re Capital Trust III (“Capital Trust III”) to register trust preferred securities.

6. ~~Contingencies~~CONTINGENCIES

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in lawsuits, arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures, the outcomes of which will determine the Company’s rights and obligations under insurance, reinsurance and other contractual agreements. In some disputes, the Company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it. In other matters, the Company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights. These disputes arise from time to time and are ultimately resolved through both informal and formal means, including negotiated resolution, arbitration and litigation. In all such matters, the Company believes that its positions are legally and commercially reasonable. While the final ~~outcome~~outcom e of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that any of these matters, when finally resolved, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or liquidity. However, an adverse resolution of one or more of these items in any one quarter or fiscal year could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in that period.

The Company does not believe that there are any material pending legal proceedings to which it or any of its subsidiaries is a party or of which any of their properties are the subject.

The Company continues to receive claims under expired insurance and reinsurance contracts asserting injuries and/or damages relating to or resulting from environmental pollution and hazardous substances, including asbestos. Environmental claims typically assert liability for (a) the mitigation or remediation of environmental contamination or (b) bodily injury or property damage caused by the release of hazardous substances into the land, air or water. Asbestos claims typically assert liability for bodily injury from exposure to asbestos or for property damage resulting from asbestos or products containing asbestos.

Table of Contents

The Company’s reserves include an estimate of the Company’s ultimate liability for asbestos and environmental (“A&E”) claims. As of ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, approximately 9%8% of the Company’s gross reserves were an estimate of the Company’s ultimate liability for A&E claims. The Company’s A&E liabilities emanate from Mt. McKinley Insurance Company’s (“Mt. McKinley”), a direct subsidiary of the Company, direct insurance business and Everest Re’s assumed reinsurance business. All of the contracts of insurance and reinsurance under which the Company has received claims during the past three years, expired more than 20 years ago. There are significant uncertainties surrounding the Company’s reserves for its A&E ~~losses.~~los ses.

~~Table of Contents~~

A&E exposures represent a separate exposure group for monitoring and evaluating reserve adequacy. The following table summarizes incurred losses with respect to A&E on both a gross and net of retrocessional basis for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
Gross basis:
Beginning of period reserves	$	704,507		$	870,998		$	786,842		$	922,843		$	638,674		$	786,842
Incurred losses		-			-			-			-			-			-
Paid losses		(52,170	)		(16,895	)		(134,505	)		(68,740	)		(13,466	)		(18,081	)
End of period reserves	$	652,337		$	854,103		$	652,337		$	854,103		$	625,208		$	768,761

Net basis:
Beginning of period reserves	$	455,379		$	513,516		$	485,296		$	537,549		$	430,421		$	485,296
Incurred losses		-			-			-			-			-			-
Paid losses		(13,527	)		(8,724	)		(43,444	)		(32,757	)		(11,191	)		(10,087	)
End of period reserves	$	441,852		$	504,792		$	441,852		$	504,792		$	419,230		$	475,209

At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the gross reserves for A&E losses were comprised of ~~$141.3~~$139.0 million representing case reserves reported by ceding companies, ~~$152.1~~$142.6 million representing additional case reserves established by the Company on assumed reinsurance claims, ~~$66.5~~$61.9 million representing case reserves established by the Company on direct excess insurance claims, including Mt. McKinley and ~~$292.4~~$281.7 million representing ~~incurred but not reported (“IBNR”)~~IBNR reserves.

With respect to asbestos only, at ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company had gross asbestos loss reserves of ~~$618.7~~$595.8 million, or ~~94.8%~~95.3%, of total A&E reserves, of which ~~$486.4~~$465.9 million was for assumed business and ~~$132.3~~$129.9 million was for direct business.

Management believes that these uncertainties and factors continue to render reserves for A&E and particularly asbestos losses significantly less subject to traditional actuarial analysis than reserves for other types of losses. The Company establishes reserves to the extent that, in the judgment of management, the facts and prevailing law reflect an exposure for the Company or its ceding companies.

Due to the uncertainties, the ultimate losses attributable to A&E, and particularly asbestos, may be subject to more variability than are non-A&E reserves and such variation, depending on coverage under the Company’s various reinsurance arrangements, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In 1993 and prior, the Company had a business arrangement with The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“The Prudential”) wherein, for a fee, the Company accepted settled claim payment obligations of certain property and casualty insurers, and, concurrently, became the owner of the annuity or assignee of the annuity proceeds funded by the property and casualty insurers specifically to fulfill these fully settled obligations. In these circumstances, the Company would be liable if The Prudential, which has an A+ (Superior) financial strength rating from A.M. Best Company (“A.M. Best”), was unable to make the annuity payments. At ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, the estimated cost to replace all such annuities for which the Company was contingently liable was ~~$151.8~~$152.8 million and ~~$152.1~~$ 152.3 million, respectively.

Table of Contents

Prior to its 1995 initial public offering, the Company had purchased annuities from an unaffiliated life insurance company with an A+ (Superior) financial strength rating from A.M. Best to settle certain claim liabilities of the company. Should the life insurance company become unable to make the annuity payments, the Company would be liable for those claim liabilities. At ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, the estimated cost to replace such annuities was ~~$24.1 million and $23.1 million, respectively.~~$24.6 million.

~~Table of Contents~~

7. ~~Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)~~OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following table presents the components of ~~other~~ comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~ in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~ for the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 2009 2008
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) ("URA(D)") of investments (1)

URA(D) of investments $ 232,607 $ (209,446 ) $ 401,856 $ (329,376 )
Tax (expense) benefit (81,413 ) 73,307 (140,650 ) 115,281
URA(D), net of tax 151,194 (136,139 ) 261,206 (214,095 )

Foreign currency translation adjustments 16,204 (15,469 ) 33,281 (16,231 )
Tax (expense) benefit (5,672 ) 5,412 (11,649 ) 5,679
Net foreign currency translation adjustments 10,532 (10,057 ) 21,632 (10,552 )

Pension adjustment 949 308 2,849 1,283
Tax expense (332 ) (108 ) (564 ) (449 )
Net pension adjustment 617 200 2,285 834

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of deferred taxes $ 162,343 $ (145,996 ) $ 285,123 $ (223,813 )

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2010			2009
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) ("URA(D)") on securities arising during the period
URA(D) of investments - temporary	$	3,666		$	87,942
URA(D) of investments - non-credit OTTI		3,051			-
Tax expense from URA(D) arising during the period		(2,351	)		(30,780	)
Total URA(D) on securities arising during the period, net of tax		4,366			57,162

Foreign currency translation adjustments		10,726			(28,742	)
Tax (expense) benefit from foreign currency translation		(3,754	)		10,060
Net foreign currency translation adjustments		6,972			(18,682	)

Pension adjustments		628			-
Tax expense on pension		(220	)		-
Net pension adjustments		408			-

Other comprehensive income, net of tax	$	11,746		$	38,480

(1) The following are the components of URA(D) of investments:

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2009 2008 2009 2008
URA(D) of investments - temporary $ 228,966 $ (209,446 ) $ 388,791 $ (329,376 )
Tax expense (80,138 ) (73,307 ) (136,077 ) (115,281 )
Net URA(D) of investments - temporary $ 148,828 $ (136,139 ) $ 252,714 $ (214,095 )

URA(D) of investments - credit OTTI $ (415 ) $ - $ 3,411 $ -
Tax benefit (expense) 145 - (1,194 ) -
Net URA(D) of investments - credit OTTI $ (270 ) $ - $ 2,217 $ -

URA(D) of investments - non-credit OTTI $ 4,056 $ - $ 9,654 $ -
Tax expense (1,420 ) - (3,379 ) -
Net URA(D) of investments - non-credit OTTI $ 2,636 $ - $ 6,275 $ -

The following table presents the components of accumulated other comprehensive income, ~~(loss),~~ net of tax, in the consolidated balance sheets for the periods indicated:

	September 30,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2010			2009
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, net of deferred taxes
URA(D) on securities, net of deferred taxes
Temporary	$	176,405		$	(69,248	)	$	137,953		$	135,570
Credit, other-than-temporary impairments		2,217			-
Non-credit, other-than-temporary impairments		(2,164	)		-
Non-credit, OTTI								658			(1,325	)
Total unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, net of deferred taxes		176,458			(69,248	)		138,611			134,245
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of deferred taxes		50,538			28,906			63,973			57,001
Pension adjustments, net of deferred taxes		(29,436	)		(31,721	)		(23,860	)		(24,268	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	197,560		$	(72,063	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income							$	178,724		$	166,978

Table of Contents

8. ~~Credit Line~~CREDIT LINE

Effective August 23, 2006, Holdings entered into a five year, $150.0 million senior revolving credit facility with a syndicate of lenders, referred to as the “Holdings Credit Facility”. Citibank N.A. is the administrative agent for the Holdings Credit Facility. The Holdings Credit Facility may be used for liquidity and general corporate purposes. The Holdings Credit Facility provides for the borrowing of up to $150.0 million with interest at a rate selected by Holdings equal to either, (1) the Base Rate (as defined below) or (2) a periodic fixed rate equal to the Eurodollar Rate plus an applicable margin. The Base Rate means a fluctuating interest rate per annum in effect from time to time to be equal to the higher of (a) the rate of interest publicly announced by Citibank as its prime rate or (b) 0.5% per annum above the Federal Funds Rate, in each case plus the applicable margin. The amount of margin and the fees payable for the Holdings Credit Facility depends upon Holdings’ senior unsecured debt rating.

The Holdings Credit Facility requires Holdings to maintain a debt to capital ratio of not greater than 0.35 to 1 and Everest Re to maintain its statutory surplus at $1.5 billion plus 25% of future aggregate net income and 25% of future aggregate capital contributions after December 31, 2005, which at ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, was ~~$1,889.9~~$1,933.8 million. As of ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, Holdings was in compliance with all Holdings Credit Facility covenants.

At ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008, there were~~2009, the Holdings Credit Facility had outstanding letters of credit of $17.0 million and $28.0 million, ~~under the Holdings Credit Facility.~~respectively.

Costs incurred in connection with the Holdings Credit Facility were ~~$166,083~~$9.3 thousand and ~~$106,158~~$26.3 thousand for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008,~~ respectively.

9. ~~Letters of Credit~~LETTERS OF CREDIT

The Citibank Holdings Credit Facility involves a syndicate of lenders (see Note 8), with Citibank acting as administrative agent. At ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, letters of credit for $17.0 million and $28.0 million, respectively, were issued and outstanding. The following table summarizes the Company’s letters of credit at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

(Dollars in thousands)
Bank	Commitment		In Use		Date of Expiry	Commitment		In Use		Date of Expiry
Citibank Holdings Credit Facility	$	150,000	$	27,959	12/31/2009	$	150,000	$	16,951	12/31/2010
Total Citibank Holdings Credit Facility	$	150,000	$	27,959		$	150,000	$	16,951

10. ~~Trust Agreements~~TRUST AGREEMENTS

A subsidiary of the Company, Everest Re, has established a trust agreement, which effectively uses Everest Re’s investments as collateral, as security for assumed losses payable to a non-affiliated ceding company. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the total amount on deposit in the trust account was ~~$24.0~~$23.7 million.

11. ~~Senior Notes~~SENIOR NOTES

On October 12, 2004, Holdings completed a public offering of $250.0 million principal amount of 5.40% senior notes due October 15, 2014. On March 14, 2000, Holdings completed a public offering of $200.0 million principal amount of 8.75% senior notes due March 15, 2010. On March 15, 2010, the $200.0 million principal amount of 8.75% senior notes matured, and was paid in cash.

Interest expense incurred in connection with these senior notes was $7.1 million and $7.8 million for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008, and $23.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.~~respectively. Market value, which is based on quoted market price at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, was ~~$247.8~~$261.0 million and ~~$186.2~~$256.1 million, respectively, for the 5.40% senior notes and ~~$206.3~~$200.0 million ~~and $156.8 million, respectively,~~ for the 8.75% senior ~~notes.~~notes at December 31, 2009.

Table of Contents

12. ~~Long Term Subordinated Notes~~LONG TERM SUBORDINATED NOTES

On April 26, 2007, Holdings completed a public offering of $400.0 million principal amount of 6.6% fixed to floating rate long term subordinated notes with a scheduled maturity date of May 15, 2037 and a final maturity date of May 1, 2067. During the fixed rate interest period from May 3, 2007 through May 14, 2017, interest will be at the annual rate of 6.6%, payable semi-annually in arrears on November 15 and May 15 of each year, commencing on November 15, 2007, subject to Holdings’ right to defer interest on one or more occasions for up to ten consecutive years. During the floating rate interest period from May 15, 2017 through maturity, interest will be based on the 3 month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 238.5 basis points, reset quarterly, payable quarterly in arrears on ~~February~~Fe bruary 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year, subject to Holdings’ right to defer interest on one or more occasions for up to ten consecutive years. Deferred interest will accumulate interest at the applicable rate compounded semi-annually for periods prior to May 15, 2017, and compounded quarterly for periods from and including May 15, 2017.

Holdings can redeem the long term subordinated notes prior to May 15, 2017, in whole but not in part at the applicable redemption price, which will equal the greater of (a) 100% of the principal amount being redeemed and (b) the present value of the principal payment on May 15, 2017 and scheduled payments of interest that would have accrued from the redemption date to May 15, 2017 on the long term subordinated notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a discount rate equal to the treasury rate plus an applicable spread of either 0.25% or 0.50%, in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest. Holdings may redeem the long term subordinated notes on or after May 15, 2017, in whole or in part at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest; however, redemption on or ~~after~~af ter the scheduled maturity date and prior to May 1, 2047 is subject to a replacement capital covenant. This covenant is for the benefit of certain senior note holders and it mandates that Holdings receive proceeds from the sale of another subordinated debt issue, of at least similar size, before it may redeem the subordinated notes.

On March 19, 2009, Group announced the commencement of a cash tender offer for any and all of the ~~6.60%~~6.6% fixed to floating rate long term subordinated notes. Upon expiration of the tender offer, the Company had reduced its outstanding debt by $161.4 million, which resulted in a pre-tax gain on debt repurchase of $78.3 million.

Interest expense incurred in connection with these long term notes was $3.9 million and ~~$6.6~~$6.5 million for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008, respectively, and $14.4 million and $19.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,~~ respectively. Market value, which is based on quoted market prices at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, was ~~$163.4~~$204.1 million and $176.5 million on the outstanding 6.6% long term subordinated notes, ~~of $238.6 million and $168.0 million on outstanding 6.6% long term subordinated notes of $399.6 million,~~ respectively.

13. ~~Junior Subordinated Debt Securities Payable~~JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT SECURITIES PAYABLE

On March 29, 2004, Holdings issued $329.9 million of 6.20% junior subordinated debt securities due, March 29, 2034, to Everest Re Capital Trust II (“Capital Trust II”). Holdings may redeem the junior subordinated debt securities before their maturity at 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest as of the date of redemption. The securities may be redeemed in whole or in part, on one or more occasions at any time on or after March 30, 2009; or at any time, in whole, but not in part, within 90 days of the occurrence and continuation of a determination that the Trust may become subject to tax or the Investment Company Act.

Fair value, which is primarily based on the quoted market price of the related trust preferred securities was $289.6 million and $272.6 million at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008, was $296.9 million and $222.2 million,~~2009, respectively, for the 6.20% junior subordinated debt securities.

Interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated notes was $5.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and ~~2008, and $15.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.~~2009.

Table of Contents

Capital Trust II is a wholly owned finance subsidiary of Holdings.

Holdings considers that the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by Holdings of Capital Trust II’s payment obligations with respect to the trust preferred securities.

Capital Trust II will redeem all of the outstanding trust preferred securities when the junior subordinated debt securities are paid at maturity on March 29, 2034. The Company may elect to redeem the junior subordinated debt securities, in whole or in part, at any time on or after March 30, 2009. If such an early redemption occurs, the outstanding trust preferred securities would also be proportionately redeemed.

There are certain regulatory and contractual restrictions on the ability of the Company’s operating subsidiaries to transfer funds to the Company in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances. The insurance laws of the State of Delaware, where the Company’s direct insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, require regulatory approval before those subsidiaries can pay dividends or make loans or advances to the Company that exceed certain statutory thresholds. In addition, the terms of the Holdings Credit Facility (discussed in Note 8) require Everest Re, the Company’s principal insurance subsidiary, to maintain a certain statutory surplus level as measured at the end of each fiscal year. At December 31, ~~2008, $1,745.6~~2009, $2,352.0 million of the ~~$2,735.2~~$3,271.1 million in net assets of the ~~Company’s~~Company’ ;s consolidated subsidiaries were subject to the foregoing regulatory restrictions.

14. ~~Segment Results~~SEGMENT REPORTING

The Company, through its subsidiaries, operates in four segments: U.S. Reinsurance, U.S. Insurance, Specialty Underwriting and International. The U.S. Reinsurance operation writes property and casualty reinsurance, on both a treaty and facultative basis, through reinsurance brokers, as well as directly with ceding companies within the U.S. The U.S. Insurance operation writes property and casualty insurance primarily through general agents, brokers and surplus lines brokers within the U.S. The Specialty Underwriting operation writes accident and health (“A&H”), marine, aviation and surety business within the U.S. and worldwide through brokers and directly with ceding companies. The International operation writes non-U.S. property and casualty reinsurance through Everest Re’s branches in Canada and Singapore and offices in Miami and New Jersey.

These segments are managed ~~in a coordinated fashion~~independently, but conform with corporate guidelines with respect to pricing, risk management, control of aggregate catastrophe exposures, capital, investments and support operations. Management generally monitors and evaluates the financial performance of these operating segments based upon their underwriting results.

Underwriting results include earned premium less losses and loss adjustment expenses ~~("LAE"~~(“LAE”) incurred, commission and brokerage expenses and other underwriting expenses. Underwriting results are measured using ratios, in particular loss, commission and brokerage and other underwriting expense ratios, which, respectively, divide incurred losses, commissions and brokerage and other underwriting expenses by premiums earned.

The Company does not maintain separate balance sheet data for its operating segments. Accordingly, the Company does not review and evaluate the financial results of its operating segments based upon balance sheet data.

Table of Contents

The following tables present the underwriting results for the operating segments for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended					Three Months Ended
U.S. Reinsurance	September 30,					September 30,					March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008			2009		2008			2010		2009
Gross written premiums	$	345,567	$	280,467		$	876,049	$	714,534		$	244,008	$	264,331
Net written premiums		191,666		146,467			487,849		424,982			128,462		139,432

Premiums earned	$	162,037	$	167,468		$	489,067	$	527,475		$	127,001	$	146,333
Incurred losses and LAE		56,158		240,734			232,262		446,013			90,108		90,141
Commission and brokerage		21,397		27,473			90,525		125,762			27,218		31,919
Other underwriting expenses		9,665		7,840			25,250		23,500			7,806		7,562
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	74,817	$	(108,579	)	$	141,030	$	(67,800	)
Underwriting gain											$	1,869	$	16,711

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended					Three Months Ended
U.S. Insurance	September 30,					September 30,					March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008		2009		2008			2010		2009
Gross written premiums	$	230,491		$	194,021	$	648,719	$	595,458		$	228,237	$	204,717
Net written premiums		76,400			98,597		301,910		312,949			102,467		121,152

Premiums earned	$	89,237		$	107,822	$	306,860	$	372,032		$	101,166	$	111,972
Incurred losses and LAE		71,423			78,386		210,329		335,965			72,950		81,144
Commission and brokerage		10,512			4,798		32,379		48,438			1,641		12,018
Other underwriting expenses		19,982			16,876		56,415		47,118			16,577		17,281
Underwriting (loss) gain	$	(12,680	)	$	7,762	$	7,737	$	(59,489	)
Underwriting gain											$	9,998	$	1,529

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended					Three Months Ended
Specialty Underwriting	September 30,					September 30,					March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008			2009			2008		2010		2009
Gross written premiums	$	67,615	$	54,828		$	183,726		$	193,941	$	65,887	$	58,923
Net written premiums		38,259		34,564			102,990			128,787		37,239		32,605

Premiums earned	$	39,182	$	35,317		$	108,513		$	126,318	$	38,898	$	36,836
Incurred losses and LAE		25,197		37,615			73,740			81,747		27,461		25,383
Commission and brokerage		10,510		8,660			29,435			30,418		8,535		10,067
Other underwriting expenses		2,383		1,937			6,227			6,182		1,951		1,845
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	1,092	$	(12,895	)	$	(889	)	$	7,971	$	951	$	(459	)

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended				Three Months Ended
International	September 30,				September 30,				March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008		2009		2008		2010			2009
Gross written premiums	$	272,603	$	248,821	$	797,606	$	654,183	$	275,350		$	250,750
Net written premiums		146,330		144,810		435,650		394,260		145,209			135,356

Premiums earned	$	147,864	$	139,285	$	433,099	$	395,511	$	147,069		$	143,304
Incurred losses and LAE		89,214		90,261		260,964		252,088		236,485			92,527
Commission and brokerage		34,840		32,885		100,062		90,652		30,447			34,215
Other underwriting expenses		6,159		4,691		16,463		14,492		6,380			4,620
Underwriting gain	$	17,651	$	11,448	$	55,610	$	38,279
Underwriting (loss) gain									$	(126,243	)	$	11,942

Table of Contents

The following table reconciles the underwriting results for the operating segments to income before taxes as reported in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive (loss) income ~~(loss)~~ for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	80,880		$	(102,264	)	$	203,488		$	(81,039	)
Underwriting (loss) gain													$	(113,425	)	$	29,723
Net investment income		65,492			97,305			179,667			292,263			85,107			39,659
Net realized capital gains (losses)		101,394			(108,652	)		56,151			(261,347	)
Net realized capital losses														(5,307	)		(68,184	)
Realized gain on debt repurchase		-			-			78,271			-			-			78,271
Corporate expense		(1,675	)		(1,425	)		(4,871	)		(4,502	)		(2,226	)		(1,318	)
Interest, fee and bond issue cost amortization expense		(17,073	)		(19,745	)		(53,779	)		(59,233	)		(16,340	)		(19,633	)
Other income (expense)		15,081			7,951			7,801			(16,039	)		5,112			(114	)
Income (loss) before taxes	$	244,099		$	(126,830	)	$	466,728		$	(129,897	)
(Loss) income before taxes													$	(47,079	)	$	58,404

The Company produces business in the U.S. and internationally. The net income deriving from and assets residing in the individual foreign countries in which the Company writes business are not identifiable in the Company’s financial records. Based on gross written premium, other than the U.S., no other country represented more than 5% of the Company’s revenues.

15. ~~Related-Party Transactions~~RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the normal course of business, the Company, through its affiliates, engages in reinsurance and brokerage and commission business transactions, with companies controlled by or affiliated with one or more of its outside directors. Such transactions, individually and in the aggregate, are not material to the Company’s financial condition, results of ~~operations~~operation and cash flows.

The Company engages in reinsurance transactions with Bermuda Re and Everest International Reinsurance, Ltd. (“Everest International”), affiliates, primarily driven by enterprise risk and capital management ~~consideration,~~considerations under which business is ceded at market rates and terms. These transactions include:

·	Effective September 19, 2000, Mt. McKinley and Bermuda Re entered into a loss portfolio transfer reinsurance agreement, whereby Mt. McKinley transferred all of its net insurance exposures and reserves to Bermuda Re.

·	Effective October 1, 2001, Everest Re and Bermuda Re entered into a loss portfolio reinsurance agreement, whereby Everest Re transferred all of its Belgium branch net insurance exposures and reserves to Bermuda Re.

For premiums earned and losses incurred for the period January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002, Everest Re, Everest National Insurance Company and Everest Security Insurance Company entered into an Excess of Loss Reinsurance Agreement with Bermuda Re, covering workers’ compensation losses occurring on and after January 1, 2002, as respects new, renewal and in force policies effective on that date through December 31, 2002. Bermuda Re is liable for any loss exceeding $100,000 per occurrence, with its liability not to exceed $150,000 per occurrence.

·	Effective January 1, 2002 for the 2002 underwriting year, Everest Re ceded 20.0% of its net retained liability to Bermuda Re through a quota share reinsurance agreement (“whole account quota share”). This agreement remained in effect through December 31, 2002.

Table of Contents

Effective January 1, 2003, Everest Re and Bermuda Re amended the whole account quota share, through which Everest Re previously ceded 20.0% of its business to Bermuda Re so that effective January 1, 2003 Everest Re ceded 25.0% to Bermuda Re of the net retained liability on all new and renewal policies underwritten during the term of this agreement. This amendment remained in effect through December 31, 2003.

~~Table of Contents~~

·	Effective January 1, 2003, Everest Re entered into a whole account quota share with Bermuda Re, whereby Everest Re’s Canadian branch ceded to Bermuda Re 50.0% of its net retained liability on all new and renewal property business. This agreement remained in effect through December 31, 2006.

Effective January 1, 2004, Everest Re and Bermuda Re amended the whole account quota share through which Everest Re previously ceded 25.0% of its business to Bermuda Re so that effective January 1, 2004 Everest Re ceded 22.5% to Bermuda Re and 2.5% to Everest International of the net retained liability on all new and renewal covered business written during the term of this agreement. This amendment remained in effect through December 31, 2005.

Effective January 1, 2006, Everest Re, Bermuda Re and Everest International amended the whole account quota share so that for all new and renewal business recorded on or after January 1, 2006, Everest Re ceded 31.5% and 3.5% of its casualty business to Bermuda Re and Everest International, respectively, and Everest Re ceded 18.0% and 2.0% of its property business to Bermuda Re and Everest International, respectively. However, in no event shall the loss cessions to Bermuda Re and Everest International relating to any one occurrence on the property business exceed $125.0 ~~million.~~million (20.0% of $625.0 million). The property portion of this amendment remained in effect through December 31, 2006. The casualty portion of this amendment remained in effect through December 31, 2007.

Effective January 1, 2007, Everest Re and Bermuda Re amended the whole account quota share so that for all new and renewal business recorded on or after January 1, 2007, Everest Re ~~cedes~~ceded 60.0% of its Canadian branch property business to Bermuda Re. This amendment remained in effect through December 31, 2009.

Effective January 1, 2007, Everest Re, Bermuda Re and Everest International amended the whole account quota share so that for all new and renewal property business recorded on or after January 1, 2007, Everest Re ceded 22.5% and 2.5% to Bermuda Re and Everest International, respectively. However, in no event shall the loss cessions to Bermuda Re and Everest International relating to any one occurrence on the property business exceed $130.0 million. This amendment remained in effect through December 31, 2007.

Effective January 1, 2008, Everest Re, Bermuda Re and Everest International amended the whole account quota share whereby, for all new and renewal casualty and property business recorded on or after January 1, 2008, Everest Re ceded 36.0% and 4.0% to Bermuda Re and Everest International, respectively. However, in no event shall the loss cessions to Bermuda Re and Everest International relating to any one catastrophe occurrence on the property business exceed $130.0 million or in the aggregate for each underwriting year for all property catastrophes exceed $275.0 million. This amendment remained in effect through December 31, 2008.

Effective October 1, 2008, Everest Re and Bermuda Re entered into a loss portfolio transfer reinsurance agreement, whereby Everest Re transferred a percentage of its net loss reserves ($747.0 million) corresponding to all existing open and future liabilities at December 31, 2007, arising from policies, insurance or reinsurance written or renewed by or on behalf of Everest Re during the period of January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2007, classified by Everest Re as casualty.

Table of Contents

Effective January 1, 2009, Everest Re, Bermuda Re and Everest International amended the whole account quota share whereby, for all new and renewal casualty and property business recorded on or after January 1, 2009, Everest Re ~~cedes 36%~~ceded 36.0% and 8%8.0% to Bermuda Re and Everest International, respectively. However, in no event shall the loss cessions to Bermuda Re and Everest International relating to any one occurrence exceed $150.0 million or in the aggregate for each underwriting year for all occurrences exceed $325.0 million. This amendment remained in effect through December 31, 2009.

Effective January 1, 2010, Everest Re entered into a whole account quota share with Bermuda Re, whereby Everest Re’s Canadian branch cedes to Bermuda Re 60.0% of its net retained liability on all new and renewal property business recorded on or after January 1, 2010. However, in no event shall the loss cessions to Bermuda Re relating to any one occurrence exceed $350.0 million (60% of $583.3 million).

Effective January 1, 2010, Everest Re entered into a whole account quota share with Bermuda Re, whereby for all new and renewal business recorded on or after January 1, 2010, Everest Re cedes 44.0% of its net retained liability to Bermuda Re. However, in no event shall the loss cessions to Bermuda Re relating to any one occurrence exceed $150.0 million or in the aggregate for each underwriting year for all such occurrences exceed $325.0 million.

~~Table of Contents~~

The following tables summarize the premiums and losses ceded by the Company to Bermuda Re and Everest International, respectively, for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended				Three Months Ended
Bermuda Re	September 30,				September 30,				March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008		2009		2008		2010		2009
Ceded written premiums	$	323,098	$	285,039	$	879,163	$	705,859	$	320,031	$	284,766
Ceded earned premiums		286,537		243,685		835,673		667,799		288,158		274,068
Ceded losses and LAE (a)		196,630		198,505		529,229		409,440		288,446		140,867

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended				Three Months Ended
Everest International	September 30,				September 30,				March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2009		2008		2009		2008		2010		2009
Ceded written premiums	$	68,937	$	30,098	$	152,819	$	73,798	$	28,312	$	38,348
Ceded earned premiums		49,381		25,739		121,664		69,517		40,332		34,336
Ceded losses and LAE		27,070		21,506		63,625		43,762		24,016		19,400

(a) Ceded losses and LAE include the Mt. McKinley loss portfolio transfer that constitutes losses ceded under retroactive reinsurance and therefore, in accordance with ~~ASC 944-20 (FAS 113, “Accounting and Reporting for Reinsurance of Short-Duration and Long-Duration Contracts”),~~FASB guidance, a deferred gain on retroactive reinsurance is reflected in other expenses on the consolidated ~~statement~~statements of operations and comprehensive income.

Everest Re sold net assets of its UKU.K. branch to Bermuda Re and provided Bermuda Re with a reserve indemnity agreement allowing for indemnity payments of up to 90% of ₤25.0 million of the excess of 2002 and prior reserves, provided that any recognition of profit from the reserves for 2002 and prior underwriting years is taken into account. The limit available under this agreement was fully exhausted at December 31, 2004.

Table of Contents

16. ~~Income Taxes~~INCOME TAXES

The Company uses a projected annual effective tax rate ~~in accordance with ASC 740-10-05 (FAS 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”),~~ to calculate its quarterly tax ~~expense.~~expense in accordance with FASB guidance. Under this methodology, when an interim quarter’s pre-tax income (loss) varies significantly from a full year’s income (loss) projection, the tax impact resulting from the income (loss) variance is effectively spread between the impacted quarter and the remaining quarters of the year, except for discreet items impacting an individual quarter.

The Company recognizes accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits and penalties in income taxes. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company expensed approximately ~~$1.3~~$1.1 million ~~and $3.9 million, respectively,~~ in interest and penalties.

17. ~~Subsequent Events~~SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated known recognized and ~~nonrecognized~~non-recognized subsequent ~~events through November 16, 2009, the date the financial statements were issued.~~events. The Company does not have any subsequent events to report.

2425

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION~~

Industry Conditions.

The worldwide reinsurance and insurance businesses are highly competitive, as well as cyclical by product and market. As such, financial results tend to fluctuate with periods of constrained availability, high rates and strong profits followed by periods of abundant capacity, low rates and constrained profitability. Competition in the types of reinsurance and insurance business that we underwrite is based on many factors, including the perceived overall financial strength of the reinsurer or insurer, ratings of the reinsurer or insurer by A.M. Best ~~Company~~ and/or Standard & Poor’s, ~~Rating Services,~~ underwriting expertise, the jurisdictions where the reinsurer or insurer is licensed or otherwise authorized, capacity and coverages offered, premiums charged, other terms and conditions of the reinsurance and insurance business offered, services offered, speed of claims payment and reputation and experience in lines written. Furthermore, the market impact from these competitive factors related to reinsurance and insurance is generally not consistent across lines of business, domestic and international geographical areas and distribution channels.

We compete in the U.S. and international reinsurance and insurance markets with numerous global competitors. Our competitors include independent reinsurance and insurance companies, subsidiaries or affiliates of established worldwide insurance companies, reinsurance departments of certain insurance companies and domestic and international underwriting operations, including underwriting syndicates at Lloyd’s. Some of these competitors have greater financial resources than we do and have established long term and continuing business relationships, which can be a significant competitive advantage. In addition, the lack of strong barriers to entry into the reinsurance business and the potential for securitization of reinsurance and insurance risks through capital markets provide additional ~~sources~~source s of potential reinsurance and insurance capacity and competition.

Starting in the latter part of 2007 ~~throughout 2008~~ and continuing into ~~2009,~~2010 there has been a significant slowdown in the global economy, which has negatively impacted the financial resources of the industry. Excessive availability and use of credit, particularly by individuals, led to increased defaults on sub-prime mortgages in the U.S. and elsewhere, falling values for houses and many commodities and contracting consumer spending. The significant increase in default rates negatively impacted the value of asset-backed securities held by both foreign and domestic institutions. The defaults have led to a corresponding increase in foreclosures, which have driven down housing values, resulting in additional losses on ~~the~~ asset-backed securities. During the third and fourth quarters of 2008, ~~the~~ credit markets ~~deteriorated~~det eriorated dramatically, evidenced by widening credit spreads and dramatically reduced availability of credit. Many financial institutions, including some insurance entities, experienced liquidity crises due to immediate demands for funds for withdrawals or collateral, combined with falling asset values and their inability to sell assets to meet the increased demands. As a result, several financial institutions have failed or been acquired at distressed prices, while others have received loans from the U.S. government to continue operations. The liquidity crisis significantly increased the spreads on fixed ~~maturities~~maturity securities and, at the same time, had a dramatic and negative impact on the stock markets around the world. The combination of losses on securities from failed or impaired companies combined with the decline in values of fixed maturity and equity securities ~~has~~ resulted in significant declines in the capital bases of most insurance and reinsurance companies. While there ~~has been~~was significant improvement in the financial markets during 2009 itand into 2010, recent concerns about the ability of some European countries to repay their bonds has hindered financial market recoveries. It is too early to predict the timing and extent of the impact ~~the capital deterioration and subsequent partial recovery~~these financial market fluctuations will have on insurance and reinsurance market conditions.

Worldwide insurance and reinsurance market conditions continued to be very competitive. Generally, there was ample insurance and reinsurance capacity relative to demand. We noted, however, that in many markets and lines during 2009 and into 2010, the rates of decline have slowed, pricing in some segments was relatively flat and there was upward movement in some others, particularly property catastrophe coverage. Competition and its effect on rates, terms and conditions vary widely by market and coverage yet continues to be most prevalent in the U.S. casualty insurance and reinsurance markets. The U.S. insurance markets in which we participate were extremely competitive as ~~well, particularly in the workers’ compensation, public entity and contractor~~well.

2526

Table of Contents

sectors. While our growth in existing programs has slowed, given the specialty nature of our business and our underwriting discipline, we believe the impact on the profitability of our business will be less pronounced than on the market generally. In addition, we continue to opportunistically add new programs and lines of business to enhance growth and profitability.

The reinsurance industry has experienced a period of falling rates and volume, particularly in the casualty lines of business. Profit opportunities have become generally less available over time; however, the unfavorable trends seem to be softening. We are now seeing smaller rate declines, pockets of stability and some increases in some markets and for some coverages. ~~As a result~~During the first quarter of ~~very~~2010, the devastating Chilean earthquake coupled with severe storms in Europe and Australia resulted in significant ~~investment and~~ catastrophe losses ~~incurred by both primary insurers and reinsurers over~~to the ~~past year, but principally in the last nine months of 2008, industry-wide capital declined and rating agency scrutiny increased.~~industry. It is too early to gauge the ~~extent of hardening, if any,~~market impacts from these losses, but we feel that ~~will occur; however, it appears that much of the redundant capital~~market conditions should improve for catastrophe coverages in the ~~industry has been depleted and the stage is set for firmer markets.~~geographical regions of these losses.

Rates in the international markets have generally been ~~more adequate than in the U.S.,~~stable and we have seen some increases, particularly for catastrophe exposed business. We have grown our business in the Middle East, Latin America and Asia. We are expanding our international reach with ~~the opening of a~~our new office in Brazil to capitalize on the recently expanded opportunity for professional reinsurers in that market and on the economic growth expected for Brazil in the future.

~~The 2009 renewals rates, particularly for property catastrophe and retrocessional covers and in international markets, were generally firmer compared to a year ago.~~

Overall, we believe that current marketplace conditions offer profit opportunities for us given our strong ratings, distribution system, reputation and expertise. We continue to employ our strategy of targeting business that offers the greatest profit potential, while maintaining balance and diversification in our overall portfolio.

2627

Table of Contents

Financial Summary.

We monitor and evaluate our overall performance based upon financial results. The following table displays a summary of the consolidated net (loss) income, ~~(loss),~~ ratios and stockholder’s equity for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Percentage			Nine Months Ended						Percentage			Three Months Ended						Percentage
	September 30,						Increase/			September 30,						Increase/			March 31,						Increase/
(Dollars in millions)	2009			2008			(Decrease)			2009			2008			(Decrease)			2010			2009			(Decrease)
Gross written premiums	$	916.3		$	778.1			17.8	%	$	2,506.1		$	2,158.1			16.1	%	$	813.5		$	778.7			4.5	%
Net written premiums		452.7			424.4			6.6	%		1,328.4			1,261.0			5.3	%		413.4			428.5			-3.5	%

REVENUES:
Premiums earned	$	438.3		$	449.9			-2.6	%	$	1,337.5		$	1,421.3			-5.9	%	$	414.1		$	438.4			-5.5	%
Net investment income		65.5			97.3			-32.7	%		179.7			292.3			-38.5	%		85.1			39.7			114.6	%
Net realized capital gains (losses)		101.4			(108.7	)		-193.3	%		56.2			(261.3	)		-121.5	%
Gain on tender of debt		-			-			-			78.3			-			-
Net realized capital losses																				(5.3	)		(68.2	)		-92.2	%
Realized gain on debt repurchase																				-			78.3		NA
Other income (expense)		15.1			8.0			89.6	%		7.8			(16.0	)		-148.6	%		5.1			(0.1	)	NM
Total revenues		620.3			446.5			38.9	%		1,659.4			1,436.2			15.5	%		499.0			488.1			2.2	%

CLAIMS AND EXPENSES:
Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses		242.0			447.0			-45.9	%		777.3			1,115.8			-30.3	%		427.0			289.2			47.7	%
Commission, brokerage, taxes and fees		77.3			73.8			4.7	%		252.4			295.3			-14.5	%		67.8			88.2			-23.1	%
Other underwriting expenses		39.9			32.8			21.7	%		109.2			95.8			14.0	%		32.7			31.3			4.5	%
Corporate expense																				2.2			1.3			69.0	%
Interest, fee and bond issue cost amortization expense		17.1			19.7			-13.5	%		53.8			59.2			-9.2	%		16.3			19.6			-16.8	%
Total claims and expenses		376.2			573.3			-34.4	%		1,192.7			1,566.1			-23.8	%		546.1			429.7			27.1	%

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES		244.1			(126.8	)	NM				466.7			(129.9	)	NM
Income tax expense (benefit)		80.0			(47.9	)	NM				128.4			(69.3	)	NM
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	164.1		$	(78.9	)	NM			$	338.3		$	(60.6	)	NM

(LOSS) INCOME BEFORE TAXES																				(47.1	)		58.4			-180.6	%
Income tax (benefit) expense																				(2.2	)		12.7			-116.9	%
NET (LOSS) INCOME																			$	(44.9	)	$	45.7			-198.4	%
							Point									Point
RATIOS:							Change									Change									Point Change
Loss ratio		55.2	%		99.4	%		(44.2	)		58.1	%		78.5	%		(20.4	)		103.1	%		66.0	%		37.1
Commission and brokerage ratio		17.6	%		16.4	%		1.2			18.9	%		20.8	%		(1.9	)		16.4	%		20.1	%		(3.7	)
Other underwriting expense ratio		9.1	%		7.2	%		1.9			8.2	%		6.7	%		1.5			7.9	%		7.1	%		0.8
Combined ratio		81.9	%		123.0	%		(41.1	)		85.2	%		106.0	%		(20.8	)		127.4	%		93.2	%		34.2


										At			At			Percentage			At			At			Percentage
										September 30,			December 31,			Increase/			March 31,			December 31,			Increase/
(Dollars in millions)											2009			2008		(Decrease)				2010			2009		(Decrease)
Balance sheet data:
Total investments and cash										$	8,073.5		$	7,395.1			9.2	%	$	8,046.4		$	8,031.6			0.2	%
Total assets											13,381.8			12,866.6			4.0	%		13,641.6			13,379.6			2.0	%
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves											7,247.0			7,420.0			-2.3	%		7,613.8			7,300.1			4.3	%
Total debt											1,017.9			1,179.1			-13.7	%		818.0			1,018.0			-19.6	%
Total liabilities											10,551.3			10,663.7			-1.1	%		10,814.7			10,520.8			2.8	%
Stockholder's equity											2,830.5			2,203.0			28.5	%		2,826.9			2,858.8			-1.1	%

(NM, not meaningful)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding)
(NA, not applicable)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Table of Contents

Revenues.

Premiums. Gross written premiums increased by ~~$138.1~~$34.8 million, or ~~17.8%~~4.5%, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, reflecting an increase of ~~$101.7~~$23.5 million in our insurance business and $11.3 million in our reinsurance ~~business and $36.5 million in our insurance~~ business. Gross written premiums increased by $348.0 million, or 16.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008, reflecting an increase of $294.7 million in our reinsurance business and $53.3 million in our insurance business. The increased reinsurance business was

~~Table of Contents~~

primarily attributable to increased rates on property business, in both the international and U.S. markets, new crop hail quota share treaty business, expanded participation on renewal contracts and new writings as ceding companies continue to favor reinsurers such as Everest, with strong financial ratings. The increase in insurance premiums were primarily in the workers’ compensation, Florida property and financial ~~institutions directors~~institution D&O and ~~officers (“D&O”) and errors and omissions (“~~E~~&O”)~~&O lines of business. The increase in reinsurance business ~~which are new offerings for us, as well as additional written~~was primarily attributable to strong growth in U.S. property, ~~insurance premiums~~South America and Asian markets, partially offset by decreased writings in ~~Florida where rates to exposure remain attractive.~~

the U.S. casualty, crop reinsurance, marine and European markets. Net written premiums ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$28.2~~$15.2 million, or ~~6.6%~~3.5%, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, and $67.4 million, or 5.3%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increases in net written premiums are~~March 31, 2009. This change was primarily due to ~~the increase in gross written~~ceded premiums ~~partially offset~~that generally relate to specific reinsurance purchased by the ~~increase~~U.S. Insurance operation and that fluctuate based upon the level of premiums written in ~~cessions under~~ the ~~affiliated quota share agreement.~~individual reinsured programs. Premiums earned decreased ~~by $11.6~~$24.3 million, or ~~2.6%~~5.5%, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, and $83.8 million, or 5.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009. The change in net premiums earned relative to net written premiums is the result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period, whereas written premiums are recorded onat the initiation of ~~coverage.~~the coverage period.

Net Investment Income. Net investment income ~~decreased~~increased by ~~32.7%~~114.6% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008 and by 38.5% for the nine months ended September 30,~~March 31, 2009, ~~compared~~primarily due to ~~the nine months ended September 30, 2008, due primarily to losses~~net investment gains from our limited ~~partnership investments~~partnerships that ~~principally~~ invest in public and non-public securities, both equity and ~~debt, which report~~debt. Gains related to ~~us on a quarter lag, a reduction~~these limited partnerships were $9.4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared with losses of $34.1 million for the comparable period in invested assets resulting from the October 1, 2008 loss portfolio transfer agreement with Everest Reinsurance (Bermuda), Ltd. (“Bermuda Re”) and lower yields for new long and short term fixed maturity investments.2009. As a result, net pre-tax investment income, as a percentage of average invested assets, was ~~3.4%~~up at 4.4% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~4.6%~~2.1% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008 and 3.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 4.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009.

Net Realized Capital ~~Gains (Losses).~~Losses. ~~Net realized capital gains were $101.4 million and $56.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively.~~ Net realized capital losses were ~~$108.7~~$5.3 million and ~~$261.3~~$68.2 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. ~~The realized gains and losses reflected for each period were primarily a function of changes in sales,~~For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded $6.5 million loss due to fair value re-measurements, ~~and other-than-temporary impairments. The largest changes~~which were partially offset by $1.2 million of net realized capital gains from sales. For the ~~result of the~~three months ended March 31, 2009, we recorded $39.1 million loss due to fair value re-measurements, $28.5 million of ~~our investment~~net realized capital losses from sales and $0.6 million in an affiliated entity’s shares and public equity securities portfolio. During 2008, our public equity securities portfolio was much larger and with the equity markets declining rapidly, fair value re-measurements resulted in realized losses. Conversely in 2009, the equity markets improved resulting in fair value re-measurement gains. In addition, other-than-temporary impairments on our available for sale fixed ~~income securities, decreased period over period due to the improving financial markets.~~maturity securities.

Realized Gain on Debt Repurchase. On March 19, 2009, we ~~announced the commencement of~~commenced a cash tender offer for any and all of the 6.60% fixed to floating rate long term subordinated notes due 2067. Upon expiration of the tender offer, we had reduced our outstanding debt by $161.4 million, which resulted in a pre-tax gain on debt repurchase of $78.3 million.

Other Income (Expense).. We recorded other income of ~~$15.1 million and $7.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. We recorded other income of $8.0~~$5.1 million and other expense of ~~$16.0~~$0.1 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The variances were primarily due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates and the deferrals on retroactive reinsurance agreements with affiliates ~~and changes in foreign currency exchange rates~~ for the corresponding periods.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Claims and Expenses.~~

~~Incurred Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses.~~ ~~The following tables present our incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) for all segments for the periods indicated.~~

Three Months Ended September 30,
Current Ratio%/ Prior Ratio%/ Total Ratio%/
(Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change
2009
Attritional (a) $ 246.7 56.3% $ (19.1) -4.4% $ 227.6 51.9%
Catastrophes 11.2 2.6% 3.2 0.7% 14.4 3.3%
A&E - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0%
Total segment $ 257.9 58.8% $ (15.9) -3.6% $ 242.0 55.2%

2008
Attritional (a) $ 301.7 67.1% $ (12.2) -2.7% $ 289.5 64.4%
Catastrophes 151.5 33.7% 6.0 1.3% 157.5 35.0%
A&E - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0%
Total segment $ 453.2 100.7% $ (6.2) -1.4% $ 447.0 99.4%

Variance 2009/2008
Attritional (a) $ (55.0) (10.8) pts $ (6.9) (1.6) pts $ (61.9) (12.4) pts
Catastrophes (140.3) (31.1) pts (2.8) (0.6) pts (143.1) (31.7) pts
A&E - - pts - - pts - - pts
Total segment $ (195.3) (41.9) pts $ (9.7) (2.2) pts $ (205.0) (44.2) pts

Nine Months Ended September 30,
Current Ratio%/ Prior Ratio%/ Total Ratio%/
(Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change
2009
Attritional (a) $ 789.0 59.0% $ (36.0) -2.7% $ 753.0 56.3%
Catastrophes 20.3 1.5% 4.0 0.3% 24.3 1.8%
A&E - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0%
Total segment $ 809.3 60.5% $ (32.0) -2.4% $ 777.3 58.1%

2008
Attritional (a) $ 870.3 61.2% $ 62.9 4.4% $ 933.1 65.7%
Catastrophes 168.3 11.8% 14.4 1.0% 182.7 12.9%
A&E - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0%
Total segment $ 1,038.6 73.1% $ 77.2 5.4% $ 1,115.8 78.5%

Variance 2009/2008
Attritional (a) $ (81.3) (2.2) pts $ (98.8) (7.1) pts $ (180.2) (9.4) pts
Catastrophes (148.0) (10.3) pts (10.4) (0.7) pts (158.4) (11.0) pts
A&E - - pts - - pts - - pts
Total segment $ (229.3) (12.6) pts $ (109.2) (7.8) pts $ (338.5) (20.4) pts

(a) Attritional losses exclude catastrophe and A&E losses.
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses and LAE were lower by $205.0 million, or 45.9%, for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. Catastrophe losses, at $14.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009, were $143.1 million lower than the same period in 2008, primarily due to the absence in 2009, of any large catastrophe losses. Attritional losses incurred decreased $61.9 million (12.4 points) for the third quarter, period over period, due to mix of business and premiums earned, in conjunction with affiliated cessions.

Incurred losses and LAE were lower by $338.5 million, or 30.3%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The primary contributor to the decrease was the result of the reduction in current year catastrophe losses of $148.0 million. The variance in the prior years’ attritional losses was primarily due to the absence, in 2009, of $85.3 million reserve strengthening on an auto loan credit program.

Table of Contents

Claims and Expenses.

Incurred Losses and LAE. The following table presents our incurred losses and LAE for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Current		Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)	Year		Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2010
Attritional (a)	$	268.2		64.8	%		$	(9.3	)		-2.2	%		$	259.0			62.5	%
Catastrophes		165.2		39.9	%			2.8			0.7	%			168.0			40.6	%
A&E		-		0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total	$	433.4		104.7	%		$	(6.4	)		-1.6	%		$	427.0			103.1	%

2009
Attritional (a)	$	257.4		58.7	%		$	20.2			4.6	%		$	277.6			63.3	%
Catastrophes		9.1		2.1	%			2.5			0.6	%			11.6			2.7	%
A&E		-		0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total	$	266.5		60.8	%		$	22.7			5.2	%		$	289.2			66.0	%

Variance 2010/2009
Attritional (a)	$	10.8		6.1		pts	$	(29.5	)		(6.8	)	pts	$	(18.6	)		(0.8	)	pts
Catastrophes		156.1		37.8		pts		0.3			0.1		pts		156.4			37.9		pts
A&E		-		-		pts		-			-		pts		-			-		pts
Total	$	166.9		43.9		pts	$	(29.1	)		(6.8	)	pts	$	137.8			37.1		pts

(a) Attritional losses exclude catastrophe and A&E losses.
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses and LAE increased by $137.8 million, or 47.7%, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2009. Of the $137.8 million increase, current year catastrophe losses increased $156.1 million corresponding to a loss ratio increase of 37.8 points, period over period, primarily due to the Chile earthquake, Australian hailstorms and winterstorm Xynthia. The $10.8 million increase in attritional losses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was the result of an increase in expected loss ratios, which more than offset a decrease in earned premiums.

Commission, Brokerage, Taxes and Fees.Commission, brokerage, taxes and fees ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$3.4~~$20.4 million, or ~~4.7%~~23.1%, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in ~~2008,~~2009. The decrease was primarily the result of lower commission rates on property contracts in conjunction with the increase in reinstatement premiums, which have no brokerage commissions and ~~decreased by $42.9 million, or 14.5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the same period in 2008. The change in this directly variable expense was influenced by~~ changes in ~~the mix of business and increased~~ cessions under the affiliated quota share agreement.

Other Underwriting Expenses. Other underwriting expenses were ~~$39.9 million compared to $32.8~~$32.7 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, and $109.2 million~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~$95.8~~$31.3 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2009. The increase was primarily due to the increase in staff and ~~2008, respectively. These increases were the result of expansion as we continue to grow our books of business. In addition, other underwriting expenses included corporate~~staff related expenses.

Corporate Expenses. Corporate expenses, which are expenses that are not allocated to segments, ~~of $1.7~~were $2.2 million and ~~$1.4~~$1.3 million for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. These expenses were previously included as underwriting expenses and ~~2008, respectively,~~therefore included in the other underwriting expense ratio. Effective January 1, 2010, these expenses were removed from the calculation of the other underwriting expense ratio and ~~$4.9 million and $4.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.~~prior periods were recalculated to conform.

Interest, Fees and Bond Issue Cost Amortization Expense. Interest and other expense was ~~$17.1~~$16.3 million and ~~$19.7~~$19.6 million for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008, respectively, and $53.8 million and $59.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,~~ respectively. The decrease ~~period over period,~~ was primarily due to the ~~partial~~combination of the repurchase of ~~our long term subordinated notes~~debt in ~~March 2009.~~the first quarter of 2009 and maturing of debt in the first quarter of 2010.

Income Tax ~~Expense~~ (Benefit). Expense. We had an income tax benefit of $2.2 million and an income tax expense of ~~$80.0 million and $128.4~~$12.7 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~respectively, and an income tax benefit $47.9 million and $69.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,~~ respectively. The period over period ~~variances were~~variance was primarily due to ~~the increase~~pre-tax losses in 2010 versus pre-tax ~~net~~ income in ~~2009 versus pre-tax net losses in 2008.~~2009. Our income tax is primarily a function of the statutory tax rate coupled with the impact from tax-preferenced investment income.

Table of Contents

Net ~~Income~~ (Loss). Income.

~~Our~~We reported a net loss of $44.9 million and net income ~~was $164.1 million and $338.3~~of $45.7 million, for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~respectively, compared to a net loss of $78.9 million and $60.6 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,~~ respectively. ~~These changes were~~This change was the result of the items discussed above.

Ratios.

Our combined ratio ~~decreased~~increased by ~~41.1~~34.2 points to ~~81.9%~~127.4% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~123.0%~~93.2% for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, and decreased by 20.8 points to 85.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to 106.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009. The loss ratio component ~~decreased 44.2 points and 20.4~~increased 37.1 points for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009, respectively,~~March 31, 2010 compared to the same ~~periods~~period last year, principally due to the ~~significant decrease~~37.8 point increase in current year catastrophe ~~losses.~~losses as a result of the Chilean earthquake, Australian hailstorms and winterstorm Xynthia. The commission and brokerage ratio component ~~increased by 1.2 points and~~ decreased by ~~1.9~~3.7 points for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009, respectively,~~March 31, 2010 compared to the same ~~periods~~period last year, due to lower rates on property contracts, no commission on reinstatement premiums and blend and mix of business, ~~and increased cessions under the affiliated quota share agreement,~~ while the other underwriting expense ratio component increased slightly by ~~1.9 points and 1.5~~0.8 points for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009, respectively,~~March 31, 2010 compared to the ~~same periods last year.~~three months ended March 31, 2009.

Stockholder's Equity.

Stockholder's equity ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$627.5~~$31.9 million to ~~$2,830.5~~$2,826.9 million at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 from ~~$2,203.0~~$2,858.8 million at December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, principally as a result of ~~$338.3~~$44.9 million of net ~~income, $261.2~~loss, partially offset by $7.0 million of foreign currency translation adjustments, $4.4 million of unrealized appreciation on investments, net of tax, ~~$21.6 million of foreign currency translation adjustments and $4.1~~$1.3 million of share-based compensation ~~transactions.~~

~~Table~~transactions and $0.4 million of ~~Contents~~

pension adjustments.

Consolidated Investment Results

Net Investment Income.

Net investment income ~~decreased 32.7%~~increased 114.6% to ~~$65.5~~$85.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 from ~~$97.3~~$39.7 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, and decreased to $179.7 million for the nine months ended September 30,~~March 31, 2009, ~~from $292.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. These decreases were~~ primarily due to an increase in recorded gains in 2010 as opposed to recorded losses in 2009 from our limited partnership ~~investments~~investments. The losses in 2009 were the result of 2008 fourth quarter losses from those limited partnerships that ~~principally invest~~invested in ~~public and~~ non-public securities ~~both equity~~ and ~~debt, which reported to us~~are on a quarter ~~lag, a reduction in invested assets resulting from the October 1, 2008 loss portfolio transfer agreement with Bermuda Re and lower yields for new long and short term fixed maturity investments.~~reporting lag.

The following table shows the components of net investment income for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
Fixed maturity securities	$	71.0		$	81.1		$	212.9		$	233.1
Fixed maturities													$	73.6		$	70.3
Equity securities		0.8			1.8			2.2			4.9			2.4			0.7
Short-term investments and cash		0.3			4.3			3.3			23.8			0.1			2.2
Other invested assets
Limited partnerships		(4.4	)		10.2			(36.5	)		29.9			9.4			(34.1	)
Other		0.7			2.4			5.7			7.2			1.8			2.8
Total gross investment income		68.2			99.8			187.6			299.0			87.2			41.9
Interest credited and other expense		(2.8	)		(2.4	)		(7.9	)		(6.6	)		(2.1	)		(2.3	)
Total net investment income	$	65.5		$	97.3		$	179.7		$	292.3		$	85.1		$	39.7
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Table of Contents

The following tables show a comparison of various investment yields for the periods indicated:

			At	At
	At September 30,	At December 31,	March 31,	December 31,
	2009	2008	2010	2009
Imbedded pre-tax yield of cash and invested assets	3.8%	4.3%	3.8%	3.7%
Imbedded after-tax yield of cash and invested assets	3.1%	3.5%	3.1%	3.1%

	Three Months Ended		Nine Months Ended		Three Months Ended
	September 30,		September 30,		March 31,
	2009	2008	2009	2008	2010	2009
Annualized pre-tax yield on average cash and invested assets	3.4%	4.6%	3.1%	4.5%	4.4%	2.1%
Annualized after-tax yield on average cash and invested assets	2.9%	3.6%	2.7%	3.6%	3.5%	2.1%

~~Table of Contents~~

Net Realized Capital ~~Gains (Losses).~~Losses.

The following table presents the composition of our net realized capital ~~gains (losses)~~losses for the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in millions) 2009 2008 Variance 2009 2008 Variance
Gains (losses) from sales:
Fixed maturity, market value
Gains $ 2.0 $ - $ 2.0 $ 4.0 $ 1.1 $ 2.9
Losses (6.1 ) (12.2 ) 6.1 (36.6 ) (14.2 ) (22.4 )
Total (4.1 ) (12.2 ) 8.1 (32.6 ) (13.1 ) (19.5 )

Fixed maturity securities, fair value
Gains 0.3 - 0.3 0.6 - 0.6
Losses (0.1 ) - (0.1 ) (0.1 ) - (0.1 )
Total 0.2 - 0.2 0.4 - 0.5

Equity securities, market value
Gains 8.0 - 8.0 8.0 - 8.0
Losses - - - - - -
Total 8.0 - 8.0 8.0 - 8.0

Equity securities, fair value
Gains 1.3 3.8 (2.5 ) 7.2 5.9 1.3
Losses - (4.8 ) 4.8 (0.7 ) (18.5 ) 17.8
Total 1.3 (1.0 ) 2.3 6.5 (12.6 ) 19.1

Total net realized gains (losses) from sales
Gains 11.6 3.8 7.8 19.8 7.0 12.8
Losses (6.3 ) (17.0 ) 10.7 (37.5 ) (32.7 ) (4.8 )
Total 5.4 (13.2 ) 18.6 (17.7 ) (25.7 ) 8.0

Other than temporary impairments: - (63.8 ) 63.8 (5.5 ) (67.9 ) 62.4

Gains (losses) from fair value adjustments:
Fixed maturities, fair value 5.8 (0.2 ) 6.0 7.8 (0.2 ) 8.0
Equity securities, fair value 23.1 (58.8 ) 81.9 23.4 (122.9 ) 146.3
Other invested assets, fair value 67.1 27.4 39.7 48.1 (44.6 ) 92.7
Total 96.0 (31.6 ) 127.6 79.3 (167.7 ) 247.0

Total net realized gains (losses) $ 101.4 $ (108.7 ) $ 210.0 $ 56.2 $ (261.3 ) $ 317.5

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding)

We reported $101.4 million net realized capital gains and $108.7 million net realized capital losses for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We recorded $96.0 million in net realized capital gains and $31.6 million in net realized capital losses due to fair value re-measurements for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This improvement in fair value was primarily due to the healthier financial markets. In addition, we did not record any other-than-temporary impairments for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the $63.8 million recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2008.

We reported $56.2 million net realized capital gains and $261.3 million net realized capital losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. We recorded $79.3 million in net realized capital gains and $167.7 million in net realized capital losses due to fair value re-measurements for the nine

	Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2010			2009			Variance
Gains (losses) from sales:
Fixed maturity securities, market value
Gains	$	1.7		$	1.5			0.2
Losses		(2.5	)		(29.6	)		27.1
Total		(0.8	)		(28.1	)		27.3

Fixed maturity securities, fair value
Gains		0.1			-			0.1
Losses		-			-			0.0
Total		0.1			-			0.1

Equity securities, fair value
Gains		2.4			0.2			2.2
Losses		(0.5	)		(0.7	)		0.2
Total		1.9			(0.4	)		2.3

Total net realized gains (losses) from sales
Gains		4.2			1.7			2.5
Losses		(3.0	)		(30.3	)		27.3
Total		1.2			(28.5	)		29.7

Other-than-temporary impairments:		-			(0.6	)		0.6

Gains (losses) from fair value adjustments:
Fixed maturities, fair value		3.0			-			3.0
Equity securities, fair value		13.2			(16.9	)		30.1
Other invested assets, fair value		(22.7	)		(22.2	)		(0.5	)
Total		(6.5	)		(39.1	)		32.6

Total net realized capital losses	$	(5.3	)	$	(68.2	)	$	62.9

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Table of Contents

months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Once again, this improvement in fair value was primarily due to the improved financial markets. We recorded other-than-temporary impairments of $5.5Net realized capital losses were $5.3 million and ~~$67.9~~$68.2 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2010, we recorded a $6.5 million in losses due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and ~~2008, respectively.~~equity securities and other invested assets, partially offset by $1.2 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, net realized capital losses included $39.1 million of fair value re-measurements on equity securities and other invested assets, $28.5 million of net realized capital losses from sales and $0.6 million in other-than-temporary impairments on our available for sale fixed maturity securities.

Segment Results.

Through our subsidiaries, we operate in four segments: U.S. Reinsurance, U.S. Insurance, Specialty Underwriting and International. The U.S. Reinsurance operation writes property and casualty reinsurance, on both a treaty and facultative basis, through reinsurance brokers, as well as directly with ceding companies within the U.S. The U.S. Insurance operation writes property and casualty insurance primarily through general agents, brokers and surplus lines brokers within the U.S. The Specialty Underwriting operation writes accident and health (“A&H”), marine, aviation and surety business within the U.S. and worldwide through brokers and directly with ceding companies. The International operation writes non-U.S. property and casualty reinsurance through Everest ~~Reinsurance Company’s (“Everest Re”) branches~~Re’s br anches in Canada and Singapore and offices in Miami and New Jersey.

Underwriting results include earned premium less losses and LAE incurred, commission and brokerage expenses and other underwriting expenses. We measure our underwriting results using ratios, in particular loss, commission and brokerage and other underwriting expense ratios, which respectively, divide incurred losses, commissions and brokerage and other underwriting expenses by premiums earned.

Our loss and LAE reserves are our best estimate of our ultimate liability for unpaid claims. We re-evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including all prior period reserves, taking into consideration all available information and, in particular, recently reported loss claim experience and trends related to prior periods. Such re-evaluations are recorded in incurred losses in the period in which the re-evaluation is made.

Table of Contents

The following discusses the underwriting results for each of our segments for the periods indicated:

U.S. Reinsurance.

The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the U.S. Reinsurance segment for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended September 30,												Nine Months Ended September 30,												Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2009			2008			Variance			% Change			2009			2008			Variance			% Change			2010			2009			Variance			% Change
Gross written premiums	$	345.6		$	280.5		$	65.1			23.2	%	$	876.0		$	714.5		$	161.5			22.6	%	$	244.0		$	264.3		$	(20.3	)		-7.7	%
Net written premiums		191.7			146.5			45.2			30.9	%		487.8			425.0			62.9			14.8	%		128.5			139.4			(11.0	)		-7.9	%

Premiums earned	$	162.0		$	167.5		$	(5.4	)		-3.2	%	$	489.1		$	527.5		$	(38.4	)		-7.3	%	$	127.0		$	146.3		$	(19.3	)		-13.2	%
Incurred losses and LAE		56.2			240.7			(184.6	)		-76.7	%		232.3			446.0			(213.8	)		-47.9	%		90.1			90.1			-			0.0	%
Commission and brokerage		21.4			27.5			(6.1	)		-22.1	%		90.5			125.8			(35.2	)		-28.0	%		27.2			31.9			(4.7	)		-14.7	%
Other underwriting expenses		9.7			7.8			1.8			23.3	%		25.3			23.5			1.8			7.4	%		7.8			7.6			0.2			3.2	%
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	74.8		$	(108.6	)	$	183.4			-168.9	%	$	141.0		$	(67.8	)	$	208.8		NM
Underwriting gain																									$	1.9		$	16.7		$	(14.8	)		-88.8	%

										Point Chg												Point Chg												Point Chg
Loss ratio		34.7	%		143.7	%					(109.0	)		47.5	%		84.6	%					(37.1	)		71.0	%		61.6	%					9.4
Commission and brokerage ratio		13.2	%		16.4	%					(3.2	)		18.5	%		23.8	%					(5.3	)		21.4	%		21.8	%					(0.4	)
Other underwriting expense ratio		5.9	%		4.7	%					1.2			5.2	%		4.5	%					0.7			6.1	%		5.2	%					0.9
Combined ratio		53.8	%		164.8	%					(111.0	)		71.2	%		112.9	%					(41.7	)		98.5	%		88.6	%					9.9

(NM, not meaningful)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Premiums. Gross written premiums ~~increased~~decreased by ~~23.2%~~7.7% to ~~$345.6~~$244.0 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 from ~~$280.5~~$264.3 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, primarily due to ~~$26.8~~$20.3 million ~~from several new crop hail quota share treaties, a $20.9 million (28.6%~~(23.2%) ~~increase~~decrease in U.S. treaty casualty volume, a $13.4 million ~~(7.0%~~(63.6%) decrease in facultative volume and a $5.3 million (30.5%) decrease in the crop hail quota share treaties, partially offset by an $18.6 million (13.5%) increase in treaty property ~~volume and a $4.0 million (22.7%) increase in facultative~~ volume. Our treaty casualty premiums were higher as we are writing more quota share business, which in part, is driven by the capital concerns of our ceding company customers looking for broader reinsurance support. The crop hail business is a new 2009 line of business for us and we anticipate similar volume in the remaining quarter of 2009. Net written premiums ~~increased~~decreased by ~~30.9%~~7.9% to ~~$191.7~~$128.5 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~$146.5~~$139.4 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, primarily due to the ~~increase~~decrease in gross written premiums. Premiums earned decreased by ~~3.2%~~13.2% to ~~$162.0~~$127.0 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~$167.5~~$146.3 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums is primarily the result of timing; premiums, for proportionate contracts, are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded on the initiation of the coverage period. ~~In addition, part of the variance was due to the impact of changes in the affiliated quota share agreement.~~

Gross written premiums increased by 22.6% to $876.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $714.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to $68.5 million from the new crop hail quota share treaties, a $59.8 million (29.7%) increase in treaty casualty volume, a $31.0 million (7.0%) increase in treaty property volume and a $2.2 million (3.2%) increase in facultative volume. Net written premiums increased by 14.8% to $487.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $425.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to the increase in gross written premiums combined with increased cessions under the affiliated quota share agreement. Premiums earned decreased by 7.3% to $489.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $527.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Variances for the nine months were reflective of the change in premium volume, timing and cessions under the affiliated quota share reinsurance agreement.

Table of Contents

Incurred Losses and LAE. The following ~~tables present~~table presents the incurred losses and LAE for the U.S. Reinsurance segment for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended September 30,
Current Ratio%/ Prior Ratio%/ Total Ratio%/
(Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change
2009
Attritional $ 72.7 44.9% $ (18.4) -11.4% $ 54.3 33.5%
Catastrophes - 0.0% 1.8 1.1% 1.8 1.1%
A&E - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0%
Total segment $ 72.7 44.9% $ (16.6) -10.2% $ 56.2 34.7%

2008
Attritional $ 96.9 57.8% $ 4.9 2.9% $ 101.8 60.8%
Catastrophes 133.4 79.7% 5.6 3.3% 138.9 83.0%
A&E - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0%
Total segment $ 230.3 137.5% $ 10.5 6.3% $ 240.7 143.7%

Variance 2009/2008
Attritional $ (24.1) (13.0) pts $ (23.3) (14.3) pts $ (47.5) (27.3) pts
Catastrophes (133.4) (79.7) pts (3.7) (2.2) pts (137.1) (81.8) pts
A&E - - pts - - pts - - pts
Total segment $ (157.5) (92.6) pts $ (27.1) (16.5) pts $ (184.6) (109.0) pts

		Nine Months Ended September 30,												Three Months Ended March 31,
	Current		Ratio%/		Prior		Ratio%/		Total		Ratio%/			Current		Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)	Year		Pt Change		Years		Pt Change		Incurred		Pt Change			Year		Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2010
Attritional														$	76.2		60.0	%		$	(4.2	)		-3.3	%		$	71.9			56.6	%
Catastrophes															15.7		12.3	%			2.5			2.0	%			18.2			14.3	%
A&E															-		0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total segment														$	91.9		72.3	%		$	(1.7	)		-1.4	%		$	90.1			71.0	%

2009
Attritional	$	250.2	51.2%		$	(18.1)	-3.7%		$	232.1	47.5%			$	73.5		50.2	%		$	16.5			11.2	%		$	90.0			61.5	%
Catastrophes		-	0.0%			0.1	0.0%			0.1	0.0%				-		0.0	%			0.2			0.1	%			0.2			0.1	%
A&E		-	0.0%			-	0.0%			-	0.0%				-		0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total segment	$	250.2	51.2%		$	(18.0)	-3.7%		$	232.3	47.5%			$	73.5		50.2	%		$	16.6			11.4	%		$	90.1			61.6	%

2008
Attritional	$	285.6	54.2%		$	9.5	1.8%		$	295.1	55.9%
Catastrophes		139.4	26.4%			11.6	2.2%			150.9	28.6%
A&E		-	0.0%			-	0.0%			-	0.0%
Total segment	$	425.0	80.6%		$	21.0	4.0%		$	446.0	84.6%

Variance 2009/2008
Variance 2010/2009
Attritional	$	(35.4)	(3.0)	pts	$	(27.6)	(5.5)	pts	$	(62.9)	(8.5)	pts		$	2.7		9.8		pts	$	(20.7	)		(14.5	)	pts	$	(18.1	)		(4.9	)	pts
Catastrophes		(139.4)	(26.4)	pts		(11.4)	(2.2)	pts		(150.8)	(28.6)	pts			15.7		12.3		pts		2.3			1.9		pts		18.0			14.2		pts
A&E		-		pts		-	-	pts		-	-	pts			-		-		pts		-			-		pts		-			-		pts
Total segment	$	(174.8)	(29.4)	pts	$	(39.0)	(7.7)	pts	$	(213.8)	(37.1)	pts		$	18.4		22.1		pts	$	(18.3	)		(12.8	)	pts	$	-			9.4		pts

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)	(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)												(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses ~~were $184.6~~remained flat at $90.1 million ~~(109.0 points) lower~~ for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 compared the three months ended September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of a $133.4~~March 31, 2010 and 2009. The $18.0 million ~~(79.7~~(14.2 points) ~~decrease due to the absence of current year~~increase in catastrophe losses was offset by a decrease in ~~the third quarter~~attritional losses of ~~2009 compared to the same period in 2008. In addition, prior years’ reserves developed favorably in 2009 by $16.6~~$18.1 million ~~primarily treaty casualty, compared to unfavorable development in 2008~~(4.9 points). The 2010 catastrophe losses consisted of ~~$10.5 million, primarily treaty property.~~

~~Incurred losses were $213.8 million (37.1 points) lower at $232.3~~$12.9 million for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to~~Chilean earthquake and $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to a $139.4 million (26.4 points) decrease due to absence of current year catastrophe losses in 2009 and $39.0 million (7.7 points) favorable variance, period over period, of prior years’ reserve development.windstorm Xynthia.

Segment Expenses. Commission and brokerage expenses decreased ~~22.1%~~14.7% to ~~$21.4~~$27.2 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 from $27.5~~March 31, 2010 compared to $31.9 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008. Commission and brokerage expenses decreased 28.0% to $90.5 million for the nine months ended September 30,~~March 31, 2009, ~~from $125.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. These decreases were~~ primarily due to the ~~fluctuation~~decline in premiums earned ~~in conjunction with~~and lower commissions on property business. Segment other underwriting expenses were $7.8 million and $7.6 million for the ~~change in the mix~~three months ended March 31, 2010 and ~~type of business written and the increased cessions under the affiliated quota share agreement. Segment other~~2009, respectively.

Table of Contents

underwriting expenses were $9.7 million and $7.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Segment other underwriting expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $25.3 million and $23.5 million, respectively.

U.S. Insurance.

The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the U.S. Insurance segment for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended September 30,												Nine Months Ended September 30,												Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2009			2008			Variance			% Change			2009			2008			Variance			% Change			2010			2009			Variance			% Change
Gross written premiums	$	230.5		$	194.0		$	36.5			18.8	%	$	648.7		$	595.5		$	53.3			8.9	%	$	228.2		$	204.7		$	23.5			11.5	%
Net written premiums		76.4			98.6			(22.2	)		-22.5	%		301.9			312.9			(11.0	)		-3.5	%		102.5			121.2			(18.7	)		-15.4	%

Premiums earned	$	89.2		$	107.8		$	(18.6	)		-17.2	%	$	306.9		$	372.0		$	(65.2	)		-17.5	%	$	101.2		$	112.0		$	(10.8	)		-9.7	%
Incurred losses and LAE		71.4			78.4			(7.0	)		-8.9	%		210.3			336.0			(125.6	)		-37.4	%		73.0			81.1			(8.2	)		-10.1	%
Commission and brokerage		10.5			4.8			5.7			119.1	%		32.4			48.4			(16.1	)		-33.2	%		1.6			12.0			(10.4	)		-86.3	%
Other underwriting expenses		20.0			16.9			3.1			18.4	%		56.4			47.1			9.3			19.7	%		16.6			17.3			(0.7	)		-4.1	%
Underwriting (loss) gain	$	(12.7	)	$	7.8		$	(20.4	)	NM			$	7.7		$	(59.5	)	$	67.2			-113.0	%
Underwriting gain																									$	10.0		$	1.5		$	8.5		NM

										Point Chg												Point Chg												Point Chg
Loss ratio		80.0	%		72.7	%					7.3			68.5	%		90.3	%					(21.8	)		72.1	%		72.5	%					(0.4	)
Commission and brokerage ratio		11.8	%		4.4	%					7.4			10.6	%		13.0	%					(2.4	)		1.6	%		10.7	%					(9.1	)
Other underwriting expense ratio		22.4	%		15.7	%					6.7			18.4	%		12.7	%					5.7			16.4	%		15.4	%					1.0
Combined ratio		114.2	%		92.8	%					21.4			97.5	%		116.0	%					(18.5	)		90.1	%		98.6	%					(8.5	)

(NM, not meaningful)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Premiums. Gross written premiums increased by ~~18.8%~~11.5% to ~~$230.5~~$228.2 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 from $194.0~~March 31, 2010 compared to $204.7 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008. Most of the new premium~~March 31, 2009. Growth was derived from ~~our entry into~~ the ~~financial institution D&O and E&O market and~~direct specialty operation in New York, additional property insurance written in Florida ~~where rates to exposure remain attractive.~~and the workers’ compensation business. Net written premiums decreased by ~~22.5%~~15.4% to ~~$76.4~~$102.5 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~$98.6~~$121.2 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008. The change in net written premiums was primarily due to the increase in gross written premiums, partially offset by~~March 31, 2009, reflective of the change in business mix and cessions. Ceded premiums generally relate to the affiliated quota share agreement and third party specific reinsurance ~~cessions.~~purchased for i ndividual reinsured programs. Premiums earned decreased ~~17.2%~~9.7% to ~~$89.2~~$101.2 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 from $107.8~~March 31, 2010 compared to $112.0 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~

Gross written premiums increased by 8.9% to $648.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $595.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Net written premiums decreased by 3.5% to $301.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $312.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Premiums earned decreased 17.5% to $306.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $372.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.March 31, 2009. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums is the result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation of the coverage ~~period, in addition to the impact of the affiliated quota share agreement.~~

period.

~~Table of Contents~~

Incurred Losses and LAE. The following ~~tables present~~table presents the incurred losses and LAE for the U.S. Insurance segment for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended September 30,
Current Ratio%/ Prior Ratio%/ Total Ratio%/
(Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change
2009
Attritional $ 71.4 80.0% $ 0.1 0.1% $ 71.4 80.0%
Catastrophes - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0%
Total segment $ 71.4 80.0% $ 0.1 0.1% $ 71.4 80.0%

2008
Attritional $ 80.7 74.9% $ (2.4) -2.2% $ 78.4 72.7%
Catastrophes - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0%
Total segment $ 80.7 74.9% $ (2.4) -2.2% $ 78.4 72.7%

Variance 2009/2008
Attritional $ (9.4) 5.1 pts $ 2.4 2.3 pts $ (7.0) 7.3 pts
Catastrophes - - pts - - pts - - pts
Total segment $ (9.4) 5.1 pts $ 2.4 2.3 pts $ (7.0) 7.3 pts

Nine Months Ended September 30,
Current Ratio%/ Prior Ratio%/ Total Ratio%/
(Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change
2009
Attritional $ 226.8 73.9% $ (16.4) -5.4% $ 210.3 68.5%
Catastrophes - 0.0% - 0.0% - 0.0%
Total segment $ 226.8 73.9% $ (16.4) -5.4% $ 210.3 68.5%

2008
Attritional $ 261.8 70.4% $ 74.4 20.0% $ 336.2 90.4%
Catastrophes - 0.0% (0.2) -0.1% (0.2) -0.1%
Total segment $ 261.8 70.4% $ 74.2 19.9% $ 336.0 90.3%

Variance 2009/2008
Attritional $ (35.1) 3.5 pts $ (90.8) (25.3) pts $ (125.8) (21.8) pts
Catastrophes - - pts 0.2 0.1 pts 0.2 0.1 pts
Total segment $ (35.1) 3.5 pts $ (90.6) (25.3) pts $ (125.6) (21.8) pts

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses and LAE decreased by 8.9% to $71.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $78.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, primarily driven by the $9.4 million decrease in current year attritional losses, principally as a result of the 17.2% decrease in premiums earned.

Incurred losses and LAE decreased by 37.4% to $210.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $336.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily driven by the 17.5% decrease in premiums earned and the absence, in 2009, of $85.3 million of prior years’ attritional loss development on an auto loan credit program.

~~Segment Expenses.~~ Commission and brokerage expenses increased to $10.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 from $4.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. Commission and brokerage expenses decreased by 33.2% to $32.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $48.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. These variances were primarily due to the decrease in premiums earned, changes in the mix of business written and the impact from internal quota share agreements whereby other underwriting expenses were ceded through commission and brokerage expense. Segment other underwriting expenses were $20.0 million and $16.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Segment other underwriting expenses were $56.4 million and $47.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. These increases were primarily due to compensation costs.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)	Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2010
Attritional	$	74.2			73.4	%		$	(1.3	)		-1.2	%		$	73.0			72.1	%
Catastrophes		-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total segment	$	74.2			73.4	%		$	(1.3	)		-1.2	%		$	73.0			72.1	%

2009
Attritional	$	80.0			71.5	%		$	1.1			1.0	%		$	81.1			72.5	%
Catastrophes		-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total segment	$	80.0			71.5	%		$	1.1			1.0	%		$	81.1			72.5	%

Variance 2010/2009
Attritional	$	(5.8	)		1.9		pts	$	(2.4	)		(2.2	)	pts	$	(8.1	)		(0.4	)	pts
Catastrophes		-			-		pts		-			-		pts		-			-		pts
Total segment	$	(5.8	)		1.9		pts	$	(2.4	)		(2.2	)	pts	$	(8.1	)		(0.4	)	pts

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

3736

Table of Contents

Incurred losses and LAE decreased by 10.1% to $73.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $81.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease in earned premium and favorable prior year’s reserve development, partially offset by higher expected attritional loss ratios.

Segment Expenses. Commission and brokerage expenses decreased by 86.3% to $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $12.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2009, which was primarily due to the fluctuation of cessions under the affiliated quota share agreement. Segment other underwriting expenses were $16.6 million and $17.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, as a result of management’s actions to reduce expenses.

Specialty Underwriting.

The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the Specialty Underwriting segment for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended September 30,												Nine Months Ended September 30,												Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2009			2008			Variance			% Change			2009			2008			Variance			% Change			2010			2009			Variance			% Change
Gross written premiums	$	67.6		$	54.8		$	12.8			23.3	%	$	183.7		$	193.9		$	(10.2	)		-5.3	%	$	65.9		$	58.9		$	7.0			11.8	%
Net written premiums		38.3			34.6			3.7			10.7	%		103.0			128.8			(25.8	)		-20.0	%		37.2			32.6			4.6			14.2	%

Premiums earned	$	39.2		$	35.3		$	3.9			10.9	%	$	108.5		$	126.3		$	(17.8	)		-14.1	%	$	38.9		$	36.8		$	2.1			5.6	%
Incurred losses and LAE		25.2			37.6			(12.4	)		-33.0	%		73.7			81.7			(8.0	)		-9.8	%		27.5			25.4			2.1			8.2	%
Commission and brokerage		10.5			8.7			1.9			21.4	%		29.4			30.4			(1.0	)		-3.2	%		8.5			10.1			(1.5	)		-15.2	%
Other underwriting expenses		2.4			1.9			0.4			23.0	%		6.2			6.2			-			0.7	%		2.0			1.8			0.1			5.7	%
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	1.1		$	(12.9	)	$	14.0			-108.5	%	$	(0.9	)	$	8.0		$	(8.9	)		-111.2	%	$	1.0		$	(0.5	)	$	1.4		NM

										Point Chg												Point Chg												Point Chg
Loss ratio		64.3	%		106.5	%					(42.2	)		68.0	%		64.7	%					3.3			70.6	%		68.9	%					1.7
Commission and brokerage ratio		26.8	%		24.5	%					2.3			27.1	%		24.1	%					3.0			21.9	%		27.3	%					(5.4	)
Other underwriting expense ratio		6.1	%		5.5	%					0.6			5.7	%		4.9	%					0.8			5.1	%		5.0	%					0.1
Combined ratio		97.2	%		136.5	%					(39.3	)		100.8	%		93.7	%					7.1			97.6	%		101.2	%					(3.6	)

(NM, not meaningful)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Premiums. Gross written premiums increased by ~~23.3%~~11.8% to ~~$67.6~~$65.9 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 from $54.8~~March 31, 2010 compared to $58.9 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, primarily due to a $9.0 million increase in aviation premiums and a $7.6 million increase in A&H premiums, partially offset~~March 31, 2009. This was driven by a ~~$4.0~~strong demand in our A&H business, $7.0 million, ~~decrease~~as more and more employers are self insuring their medical programs leading to more opportunities for us in ~~surety premiums.~~the medical stop loss business. Net written premiums increased by ~~10.7%~~14.2% to ~~$38.3~~$37.2 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~$34.6~~$32.6 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, primarily as a result of the increase in gross writings combined with the ~~aviation and A&H lines.~~change in business mix. Premiums earned ~~increased by 10.9%~~increas ed to ~~$39.2~~$38.9 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~$35.3~~$36.8 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, in line with the change in net written premiums.~~

Gross written premiums decreased by 5.3% to $183.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $193.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to a $24.1 million decrease in marine premiums, partially offset by a $9.5 million increase in aviation premiums and a $3.6 million increase in A&H premiums. Net written premiums decreased by 20.0% to $103.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $128.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as a result of the decrease in gross writings and increased cessions under the affiliated quota share agreement. Premiums earned decreased to $108.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $126.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.March 31, 2009. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums is the result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation of the coverage period.

3837

Table of Contents

Incurred Losses and LAE. The following ~~tables present~~table presents the incurred losses and LAE for the Specialty Underwriting segment for the periods indicated.

Three Months Ended September 30,
Current Ratio%/ Prior Ratio%/ Total Ratio%/
(Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change
2009
Attritional $ 26.2 66.8% $ (0.2) -0.4% $ 26.0 66.4%
Catastrophes - 0.0% (0.8) -2.1% (0.8) -2.1%
Total segment $ 26.2 66.8% $ (1.0) -2.5% $ 25.2 64.3%

2008
Attritional $ 24.6 69.8% $ - 0.0% $ 24.6 69.8%
Catastrophes 10.5 29.7% 2.5 7.0% 13.0 36.7%
Total segment $ 35.1 99.5% $ 2.5 7.0% $ 37.6 106.5%

Variance 2009/2008
Attritional $ 1.5 (3.0) pts $ (0.2) (0.4) pts $ 1.4 (3.4) pts
Catastrophes (10.5) (29.7) pts (3.3) (9.1) pts (13.8) (38.8) pts
Total segment $ (9.0) (32.7) pts $ (3.4) (9.5) pts $ (12.4) (42.2) pts

		Nine Months Ended September 30,												Three Months Ended March 31,
	Current		Ratio%/		Prior		Ratio%/		Total		Ratio%/			Current		Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)	Year		Pt Change		Years		Pt Change		Incurred		Pt Change			Year		Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2010
Attritional														$	26.6		68.3	%		$	(0.3	)		-0.7	%		$	26.3			67.6	%
Catastrophes															-		0.0	%			1.2			3.0	%			1.2			3.0	%
Total segment														$	26.6		68.3	%		$	0.9			2.3	%		$	27.5			70.6	%

2009
Attritional	$	77.0	70.9%		$	(6.0)	-5.5%		$	71.0	65.4%			$	22.6		61.3	%		$	0.9			2.4	%		$	23.5			63.7	%
Catastrophes		-	0.0%			2.8	2.6%			2.8	2.6%				-		0.0	%			1.9			5.2	%			1.9			5.2	%
Total segment	$	77.0	70.9%		$	(3.2)	-3.0%		$	73.7	68.0%			$	22.6		61.3	%		$	2.8			7.6	%		$	25.4			68.9	%

2008
Attritional	$	75.1	59.5%		$	(7.7)	-6.1%		$	67.4	53.4%
Catastrophes		10.5	8.3%			3.9	3.1%			14.4	11.4%
Total segment	$	85.6	67.8%		$	(3.9)	-3.1%		$	81.7	64.7%

Variance 2009/2008
Variance 2010/2009
Attritional	$	1.8	11.5	pts	$	1.7	0.6	pts	$	3.6	12.0	pts		$	4.0		7.0		pts	$	(1.2	)		(3.1	)	pts	$	2.8			3.9		pts
Catastrophes		(10.5)	(8.3)	pts		(1.1)	(0.5)	pts		(11.6)	(8.8)	pts			-		-		pts		(0.7	)		(2.2	)	pts		(0.7	)		(2.2	)	pts
Total segment	$	(8.7)	3.1	pts	$	0.7	0.1	pts	$	(8.0)	3.3	pts		$	4.0		7.0		pts	$	(1.9	)		(5.3	)	pts	$	2.1			1.7		pts

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)	(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)												(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses and LAE ~~decreased~~increased by ~~33.0%~~8.2% to ~~$25.2~~$27.5 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~$37.6~~$25.4 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, principally as a result of favorable variances in current and prior years’ catastrophe losses in~~March 31, 2009, ~~in comparison to 2008.~~

~~Incurred losses and LAE decreased by 9.8% to $73.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $81.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008,~~ primarily as a result of ~~decreased catastrophe~~an increase in expected loss ratios, which increased current year attritional losses, 3.9 points, in ~~2009 in comparison to 2008.~~2010.

Segment Expenses. Commission and brokerage expenses ~~increased~~decreased 15.2% to ~~$10.5~~$8.5 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 from $8.7~~March 31, 2010 compared to $10.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008. Commission~~March 31, 2009 primarily driven by the mix in business as the lower commission business, aviation, has increased while higher commission, marine and brokerage expenses decreased to $29.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $30.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. These fluctuations are primarily the result of fluctuations in premiums earned and the increase in the affiliated quota share agreement.surety, business have declined. Segment other underwriting expenses ~~were $2.4 million and $1.9~~increased slightly to $2.0 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Segment other underwriting expenses were $6.2~~March 31, 2010 compared to $1.8 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 and 2008.~~March 31, 2009.

~~Table of Contents~~

International.

The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the International segment for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended September 30,												Nine Months Ended September 30,											Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in millions)	2009			2008			Variance			% Change			2009			2008			Variance		% Change			2010			2009			Variance			% Change
Gross written premiums	$	272.6		$	248.8		$	23.8			9.6	%	$	797.6		$	654.2		$	143.4		21.9	%	$	275.4		$	250.8		$	24.6			9.8	%
Net written premiums		146.3			144.8			1.5			1.0	%		435.7			394.3			41.4		10.5	%		145.2			135.4			9.9			7.3	%

Premiums earned	$	147.9		$	139.3		$	8.6			6.2	%	$	433.1		$	395.5		$	37.6		9.5	%	$	147.1		$	143.3		$	3.8			2.6	%
Incurred losses and LAE		89.2			90.3			(1.0	)		-1.2	%		261.0			252.1			8.9		3.5	%		236.5			92.5			144.0			155.6	%
Commission and brokerage		34.8			32.9			2.0			5.9	%		100.1			90.7			9.4		10.4	%		30.4			34.2			(3.8	)		-11.0	%
Other underwriting expenses		6.2			4.7			1.5			31.3	%		16.5			14.5			2.0		13.6	%		6.4			4.6			1.8			38.1	%
Underwriting gain	$	17.7		$	11.4		$	6.2			54.2	%	$	55.6		$	38.3		$	17.3		45.3	%
Underwriting (loss) gain																								$	(126.2	)	$	11.9		$	(138.2	)	NM

										Point Chg											Point Chg												Point Chg
Loss ratio		60.3	%		64.8	%					(4.5	)		60.3	%		63.7	%				(3.4	)		160.8	%		64.6	%					96.2
Commission and brokerage ratio		23.6	%		23.6	%					-			23.1	%		22.9	%				0.2			20.7	%		23.9	%					(3.2	)
Other underwriting expense ratio		4.2	%		3.4	%					0.8			3.8	%		3.7	%				0.1			4.3	%		3.2	%					1.1
Combined ratio		88.1	%		91.8	%					(3.7	)		87.2	%		90.3	%				(3.1	)		185.8	%		91.7	%					94.1

(NM, not meaningful)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Table of Contents

Premiums. Gross written premiums increased by ~~9.6%~~9.8% to ~~$272.6~~$275.4 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 from $248.8~~March 31, 2010 compared to $250.8 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008. As a result of our~~March 31, 2009. Continued strong ~~financial strength ratings, we continue to see increased participations on treaties~~growth in ~~most regions,~~Brazil, $9.9 million increase, and Asia, $10.3 million increase, were partially offset by lower writings in Canada, $2.3 million decrease. Asia has the largest growth from both new business ~~writings~~ and ~~preferential signings, including preferential terms~~increased participation on contracts in Japan and ~~conditions. In addition, rates,~~Taiwan. Also included, were $7.0 million in ~~some markets, also contributed to~~reinstatement premiums from the increased written premiums. Premiums written through the Brazil, Miami and New Jersey offices increased by $11.1 million (7.0%), through the Asian branch by $7.4 million (13.8%) and through the Canadian branch by $5.3 million (14.0%).Chilean earthquake. Net written premiums increased by ~~1.0%~~7.3% to ~~$146.3~~$145.2 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~$144.8 million~~$135.4 millio n for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, primarily due to the increase in gross written premiums ~~which were partially offset by increased~~coupled with the increase in cessions under the affiliated quota ~~share agreement.~~share. Premiums earned increased by ~~6.2%~~2.6% to ~~$147.9~~$147.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~$139.3~~$143.3 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums is the~~March 31, 2009, as a result of ~~timing; premiums are earned notably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation of the coverage period.~~

Gross written premiums increased by 21.9% to $797.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 from $654.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Premiums written through the Brazil, Miami and New Jersey offices increased by $112.5 million (27.3%) and through the Asian branch by $31.9 million (24.5%), while premiums written through the Canadian branch decreased by $1.0 million (0.9%). Net written premiums increased by 10.5% to $435.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $394.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. Premiums earned increased by 9.5% to $433.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $395.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, in line with the increase in net written premiums. ~~Variance explanations for the nine months were similar to factors discussed above for the three months.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

Incurred Losses and LAE. The following ~~tables present~~table presents the incurred losses and LAE for the International segment for the periods indicated.

		Three Months Ended September 30,												Three Months Ended March 31,
	Current		Ratio%/		Prior		Ratio%/		Total		Ratio%/			Current		Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total		Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)	Year		Pt Change		Years		Pt Change		Incurred		Pt Change			Year		Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred		Pt Change
2010
Attritional														$	91.3		62.1	%		$	(3.5	)		-2.4	%		$	87.8		59.7	%
Catastrophes															149.5		101.7	%			(0.9	)		-0.6	%			148.7		101.1	%
Total segment														$	240.8		163.7	%		$	(4.3	)		-2.9	%		$	236.5		160.8	%

2009
Attritional	$	76.4	51.7%		$	(0.6)	-0.4%		$	75.8	51.3%			$	81.3		56.7	%		$	1.7			1.2	%		$	83.0		57.9	%
Catastrophes		11.2	7.6%			2.1	1.5%			13.4	9.0%				9.1		6.3	%			0.5			0.3	%			9.5		6.7	%
Total segment	$	87.7	59.3%		$	1.5	1.0%		$	89.2	60.3%			$	90.4		63.1	%		$	2.2			1.5	%		$	92.5		64.6	%

2008
Variance 2010/2009
Attritional	$	99.4	71.4%		$	(14.8)	-10.6%		$	84.7	60.8%			$	10.0		5.4		pts	$	(5.2	)		(3.6	)	pts	$	4.8		1.8		pts
Catastrophes		7.6	5.5%			(2.0)	-1.5%			5.6	4.0%				140.4		95.4		pts		(1.4	)		(0.9	)	pts		139.2		94.4		pts
Total segment	$	107.0	76.9%		$	(16.8)	-12.0%		$	90.3	64.8%			$	150.4		100.6		pts	$	(6.5	)		(4.4	)	pts	$	144.0		96.2		pts

Variance 2009/2008
Attritional	$	(23.0)	(19.7)	pts	$	14.2	10.2	pts	$	(8.8)	(9.5)	pts
Catastrophes		3.6	2.1	pts		4.2	2.9	pts		7.8	5.0	pts
Total segment	$	(19.4)	(17.6)	pts	$	18.3	13.0	pts	$	(1.0)	(4.5)	pts
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)													(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Nine Months Ended September 30,
Current Ratio%/ Prior Ratio%/ Total Ratio%/
(Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change
2009
Attritional $ 235.0 54.3% $ 4.5 1.1% $ 239.5 55.3%
Catastrophes 20.3 4.7% 1.1 0.3% 21.4 5.0%
Total segment $ 255.3 58.9% $ 5.7 1.3% $ 261.0 60.3%

2008
Attritional $ 247.7 62.6% $ (13.2) -3.3% $ 234.5 59.3%
Catastrophes 18.4 4.7% (0.8) -0.2% 17.6 4.5%
Total segment $ 266.1 67.3% $ (14.1) -3.6% $ 252.1 63.7%

Variance 2009/2008
Attritional $ (12.7) (8.4) pts $ 17.8 4.4 pts $ 5.0 (4.0) pts
Catastrophes 1.9 0.0 pts 2.0 0.5 pts 3.8 0.5 pts
Total segment $ (10.8) (8.4) pts $ 19.7 4.9 pts $ 8.9 (3.4) pts

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses and LAE decreased by 1.2% to $89.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to $90.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The segment loss ratio decreased by 4.5 points for the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008, primarily due to the decreased third quarter 2009 attritional losses (9.5 points), partially offset by the increased catastrophe losses (5.0 points).

Incurred losses and LAE increased by ~~3.5%~~155.6% to ~~$261.0~~$236.5 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 compared to ~~$252.1~~$92.5 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of~~March 31, 2009. The increase was principally due to the $140.4 million increase in ~~premium earned.~~current year catastrophe losses due to the Chilean earthquake ($129.9 million) and the Australian hailstorms ($19.6 million). Current year attritional losses also increased due to an increase in expected loss ratios.

Segment Expenses. Commission and brokerage expenses ~~increased 5.9%~~decreased 11.0% to ~~$34.8~~$30.4 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 from $32.9~~March 31, 2010 compared to $34.2 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008. Commission and brokerage expenses increased 10.4% to $100.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,~~March 31, 2009, ~~from $90.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. These changes are~~ primarily ~~the~~as a result of ~~the change in earned premium and the blend of business mix.~~lower contingent commissions. Segment other underwriting expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 were ~~$6.2~~$6.4 million ~~and $4.7~~compared to $4.6 million for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009, ~~and 2008, respectively. Segment other underwriting expenses were $16.5 million and $14.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.~~consistent with expectations.

~~Table of Contents~~

Market Sensitive Instruments.

The Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Financial Reporting Release #48 requires registrants to clarify and expand upon the existing financial statement disclosure requirements for derivative financial instruments, derivative commodity instruments and other financial instruments (collectively, “market sensitive instruments”). We do not generally enter into market sensitive instruments for trading purposes.

Our current investment strategy seeks to maximize after-tax income through a high quality, diversified, taxable and tax-preferenced fixed maturity portfolio, while maintaining an adequate level of liquidity. Our mix of taxable and tax-preferenced investments is adjusted periodically, consistent with our current and projected operating results, market conditions and our tax position. The fixed maturity securities in the investment portfolio are comprised of non-trading available for sale securities. Additionally, we have invested in equity securities.

~~Our~~

Table of Contents

The overall investment strategy considers the scope of present and anticipated Company operations. In particular, estimates of the financial impact resulting from non-investment asset and liability transactions, together with our capital structure and other factors, are used to develop a net liability analysis. This analysis includes estimated payout characteristics for which our investments provide liquidity. This analysis is considered in the development of specific investment strategies for asset allocation, duration and credit quality. The change in overall market sensitive risk exposure principally reflects the asset changes that took place during the period.

Interest Rate Risk. Our ~~$8.1~~$8.0 billion investment portfolio, at ~~September 30, 2009 was~~March 31, 2010, is principally comprised of fixed maturity securities, which are generally subject to interest rate risk and some foreign currency exchange rate risk, and some equity securities, which are subject to price ~~fluctuations and some foreign exchange rate risk.~~fluctuations. The impact of the foreign exchange risks on the investment portfolio is partially mitigated by changes in the dollar value of foreign currency denominated liabilities and their associated income statement impact.

Interest rate risk is the potential change in value of the fixed maturity ~~securities~~ portfolio, including short-term investments, from a change in market interest rates. In a declining interest rate environment, it includes prepayment risk on the ~~$509.7~~$542.8 million of mortgage-backed securities in the ~~$6,416.7~~$6,489.2 million fixed maturity ~~securities~~ portfolio. Prepayment risk results from potential accelerated principal payments that shorten the average life and thus the expected yield of the security.

The table below displays the potential impact of market value fluctuations and after-tax unrealized appreciation on our fixed maturity ~~securities~~ portfolio (including ~~$645.1~~$250.1 million of short-term investments) for the ~~period~~periods indicated based on upward and downward parallel and immediate 100 and 200 basis point shifts in interest rates. For legal entities with a U.S. dollar functional currency, this modeling was performed on each security individually. To generate appropriate price estimates onfor mortgage-backed securities, changes in prepayment expectations under different interest rate environments were taken into account. For legal entities with a non-U.S. dollar functional currency, the effective duration of the involved portfolio of securities was used as a proxy for the market value change under the various interest rate change scenarios.

	Impact of Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points															Impact of Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points
	At September 30, 2009															At March 31, 2010
(Dollars in millions)		-200			-100			0			100			200			-200			-100			0			100			200
Total Market/Fair Value	$	7,665.3		$	7,380.6		$	7,061.8		$	6,697.5		$	6,353.4		$	7,335.1		$	7,061.8		$	6,739.3		$	6,382.6		$	6,045.8
Market/Fair Value Change from Base (%)		8.5	%		4.5	%		0.0	%		-5.2	%		-10.0	%		8.8	%		4.8	%		0.0	%		-5.3	%		-10.3	%
Change in Unrealized Appreciation
After-tax from Base ($)	$	392.3		$	207.2		$	-		$	(236.8	)	$	(460.5	)	$	387.2		$	209.6		$	-		$	(231.9	)	$	(450.8	)

We had ~~$7,247.0~~$7,613.8 million and ~~$7,420.0~~$7,300.1 million of gross reserves for losses and LAE as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, respectively. These amounts are recorded at their nominal value, as opposed to present value, which would reflect a discount adjustment to reflect the time value of money. Since losses are paid out over a period of time, the present value of the reserves is less than the nominal

~~Table of Contents~~

value. As interest rates rise, the present value of the reserves decreases and, conversely, as interest rates decline, the present value increases. These movements are the opposite of the interest rate impacts on the fair value of investments. While the difference between present value and nominal value is not reflected in our financial statements, our financial results will ~~include~~inc lude investment income over time from the investment portfolio until the claims are paid. Our ~~fixed income portfolio has~~loss and loss reserve obligations have an expected duration that is reasonably consistent with our ~~loss and loss reserve obligations.~~fixed income portfolio.

Equity Risk. Equity risk is the potential change in fair and/or market value of the common stock and preferred stock portfolios arising from changing equity prices. Our equity investments consist of a diversified portfolio of individual securities and mutual funds, which invest principally in high quality common and preferred stocks that are traded on major exchanges. The primary objective of the equity portfolio ~~was~~is to obtain greater total return relative to bonds over time through market appreciation and ~~dividend~~ income.

Table of Contents

The table below displays the impact on ~~the~~ fair/market value and ~~the~~ after-tax ~~change in fair/market value~~appreciation/(depreciation) of a 10% and 20% change in equity prices up and down for the ~~period~~periods indicated.

	Impact of Percentage Change in Equity Fair/Market Values												Impact of Percentage Change in Equity Fair/Market Values
	At September 30, 2009												At March 31, 2010
(Dollars in millions)	-20%				-10%			0%		10%		20%		-20%			-10%			0%		10%		20%
Fair/Market Value of the Equity Portfolio	$	126.8		$	142.6		$	158.5	$	174.3	$	190.2	$	315.6		$	355.1		$	394.6	$	434.0	$	473.5
After-tax Change in Fair/Market Value	$	(20.6	)	$	(10.3	)	$	-	$	10.3	$	20.6		(51.3	)		(25.6	)		-		25.6		51.3

Foreign ~~Currency~~Exchange Risk. Foreign currency risk is the potential change in value, income and cash flow arising from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Each of our non-U.S. (“foreign”) operations maintains capital in the currency of the country of its geographic location consistent with local regulatory guidelines. ~~Generally, we prefer to maintain the capital of our operations in U.S. dollar assets, although this varies by regulatory jurisdiction in accordance with market needs.~~ Each foreign operation may conduct business in its local currency, as well as the currency of other countries in which it operates. The primary foreign currency exposures for ~~our~~these foreign operations are the Canadian Dollar, the British Pound Sterling and the Euro. We mitigate foreign exchange exposure by generally matching the currency and duration of our assets to our ~~corresponding~~corresp onding operating liabilities. In accordance with ~~ASC 830 (Financial Accounting Standards No. 52 “Foreign Currency Translation”),~~FASB guidance, we translate the assets, liabilities and income of non-U.S. dollar functional currency legal entities to the U.S. dollar. This translation amount is reported as a component of other comprehensive income. As of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010, there has been no material change in exposure to foreign exchange rates as compared to December 31, ~~2008.~~2009.

~~Safe Harbor Disclosure.~~SAFE HARBOR DISCLOSURE

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in the federal securities laws. In some cases, these statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “expect”, “plan”, “believe”, “predict”, “potential” and “intend”. Forward-looking statements contained in this report include information regarding our reserves for losses and LAE, the adequacy of our provision for uncollectible balances, estimates of our ~~catastrophe~~c atastrophe exposure, the effects of catastrophic events on our financial statements and the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends. Forward-looking statements only reflect our expectations and are not guarantees of performance. These statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Actual events or results may differ materially from our expectations. Important factors that could cause our actual events or results to be materially different from our expectations include the uncertainties that surround the impact on our financial statements and liquidity resulting from changes in the global economy and credit markets, the estimating of reserves for losses and LAE, those discussed in Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) included in this report and ~~the~~ risks described under the caption “Risk Factors” in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, ~~PART I,~~Part 1, ITEM 1A. We undertake no obligation to update oro r revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

~~Table of Contents~~

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk Instruments. See “Market Sensitive Instruments” in PART I – ITEM 2.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive ~~Officer~~Of ficer and Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to

Table of Contents

materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such change during the quarter covered by this report.

PART II

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of business, we are involved in lawsuits, arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures, the outcomes of which will determine our rights and obligations under insurance, reinsurance and other contractual agreements. These disputes arise from time to time and are ultimately resolved through both informal and formal means, including negotiated resolution, arbitration and litigation. In all such matters, we believe that our positions are legally and commercially reasonable, and we vigorously seek to preserve, enforce and defend our legal rights under various agreements. While the final outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that any of these matters, when finally resolved, will have a material adverse effect on ~~our~~o ur financial position or liquidity. However, an adverse resolution of one or more of these items in any one quarter or fiscal year could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in that period.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

No material changes.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. ~~SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS~~

~~None.~~

~~Table of Contents~~RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit Index:

Exhibit No. Description

31.1 Section 302 Certification of Joseph V. Taranto

31.2 Section 302 Certification of Dominic J. Addesso

32.1 Section 906 Certification of Joseph V. Taranto and Dominic J. Addesso

4542

Table of Contents

Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc.

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

~~Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc.~~

~~Signatures~~


~~Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this~~ ~~report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.~~


	Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc.
	(Registrant)


	/S/DOMINIC J. ADDESSO
	Dominic J. Addesso
	Executive Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer

	(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)



~~Dated: November 16, 2009~~

Dated: May 17, 2010

	At December 31, 2008
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Appreciation		Depreciation			Value
Fixed maturity securities - available for sale
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	139,776	$	15,456	$	-		$	155,232
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		3,846,754		113,885		(164,921	)		3,795,718
Corporate securities		482,533		18,404		(64,620	)		436,317
Asset-backed securities		13,795		7		(4,441	)		9,361
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		6,516		-		(1,067	)		5,449
Agency residential		170,299		4,838		(33	)		175,104
Non-agency residential		54,816		-		(18,252	)		36,564
Foreign government securities		467,935		32,538		(7,776	)		492,697
Foreign corporate securities		428,059		6,602		(29,247	)		405,414
Total fixed maturity securities	$	5,610,483	$	191,730	$	(290,357	)	$	5,511,856
Equity securities	$	15	$	1	$	-		$	16

(1)	The following are the components of URA(D) of investments:

		Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
		September 30,						September 30,
	(Dollars in thousands)		2009			2008			2009			2008
	URA(D) of investments - temporary	$	228,966		$	(209,446	)	$	388,791		$	(329,376	)
	Tax expense		(80,138	)		(73,307	)		(136,077	)		(115,281	)
	Net URA(D) of investments - temporary	$	148,828		$	(136,139	)	$	252,714		$	(214,095	)

	URA(D) of investments - credit OTTI	$	(415	)	$	-		$	3,411		$	-
	Tax benefit (expense)		145			-			(1,194	)		-
	Net URA(D) of investments - credit OTTI	$	(270	)	$	-		$	2,217		$	-

	URA(D) of investments - non-credit OTTI	$	4,056		$	-		$	9,654		$	-
	Tax expense		(1,420	)		-			(3,379	)		-
	Net URA(D) of investments - non-credit OTTI	$	2,636		$	-		$	6,275		$	-