UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED:

June 30, ~~2011~~2012

Commission file number:

1-14527

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		22-3263609
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

477 Martinsville Road

Post Office Box 830

Liberty Corner, New Jersey 07938-0830

(908) 604-3000

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,

of registrant’s principal executive office)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer		Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer	X	Smaller reporting company
(Do not check if smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

	Number of Shares Outstanding
Class	At August 1, ~~2011~~2012
Common Shares, $0.01 par value		1,000

The Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H (1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this form with the reduced disclosure format permitted by General Instruction H of Form 10-Q.

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

Table of Contents

Form 10-Q

Page

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.	Financial Statements

	Consolidated Balance Sheets at June 30, ~~2011~~2012 (unaudited) and
		December 31, ~~2010~~2011	1

	Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for
		the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 (unaudited)	2

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity for the three and
		six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 (unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three and six months ended
		June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 (unaudited)	4

	Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements (unaudited)		5

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
		Results of Operation	2827

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		4643

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		4643

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION


Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	4643

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4743

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4743

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	4743

Item 4.	~~Reserved~~Mine Safety Disclosures	4743

Item 5.	Other Information	4744

Item 6.	Exhibits	4744

Table of Contents

Part I

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	June 30,		December 31,		June 30,		December 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except par value per share)	2011		2010		2012		2011
	(unaudited)				(unaudited)
ASSETS:
Fixed maturities - available for sale, at market value	$	5,299,902	$	5,599,940	$	5,228,179	$	5,107,028
(amortized cost: 2011, $5,098,886; 2010, $5,438,359)
(amortized cost: 2012, $4,991,177; 2011, $4,880,654)
Fixed maturities - available for sale, at fair value		128,337		180,482		62,831		113,606
Equity securities - available for sale, at market value (cost: 2011, $15 2010, $15)		12		13
Equity securities - available for sale, at market value (cost: 2012, $15; 2011, $15)						13		10
Equity securities - available for sale, at fair value		972,802		683,454		1,163,570		1,207,053
Short-term investments		566,111		516,885		580,773		423,663
Other invested assets (cost: 2011, $393,058; 2010, $405,401)		392,843		406,916
Other invested assets (cost: 2012, $407,775; 2011, $379,342)						407,775		379,342
Other invested assets, at fair value		794,608		788,142		1,005,920		817,352
Cash		288,365		118,092		305,733		348,267
Total investments and cash		8,442,980		8,293,924		8,754,794		8,396,321
Accrued investment income		62,790		70,874		56,092		55,849
Premiums receivable		773,721		643,257		753,963		856,375
Reinsurance receivables - unaffiliated		685,233		670,168		590,019		570,128
Reinsurance receivables - affiliated		3,056,730		2,708,193		2,849,363		2,901,174
Funds held by reinsureds		177,553		171,179		154,861		176,156
Deferred acquisition costs		167,339		184,247		99,304		166,806
Prepaid reinsurance premiums		567,466		629,323		529,997		625,391
Deferred tax asset		150,594		183,924		249,466		366,490
Federal income taxes recoverable		147,127		142,421
Income taxes recoverable						34,331		39,014
Other assets		240,901		171,923		209,531		195,476
TOTAL ASSETS	$	14,472,434	$	13,869,433	$	14,281,721	$	14,349,180

LIABILITIES:
Reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses	$	8,275,580	$	7,652,303	$	8,013,731	$	8,290,619
Unearned premium reserve		1,187,555		1,287,476		1,040,278		1,239,705
Funds held under reinsurance treaties		178,453		180,377		84,305		123,479
Losses in the course of payment		29,875		13,089		20,810		11,002
Commission reserves		32,117		37,796		31,423		40,353
Other net payable to reinsurers		556,127		467,486		663,085		620,659
Revolving credit borrowings		40,000		50,000
5.4% Senior notes due 10/15/2014		249,835		249,812		249,882		249,858
6.6% Long term notes due 05/01/2067		238,352		238,351
6.6% Long term notes due 5/1/2067						238,355		238,354
Junior subordinated debt securities payable		329,897		329,897		329,897		329,897
Accrued interest on debt and borrowings		4,789		4,793		4,781		4,781
Other liabilities		272,363		230,312		313,694		259,080
Total liabilities		11,394,943		10,741,692		10,990,241		11,407,787

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)

STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY:
Common stock, par value: $0.01; 3,000 shares authorized;
1,000 shares issued and outstanding (2011 and 2010)		-		-
1,000 shares issued and outstanding (2012 and 2011)						-		-
Additional paid-in capital		330,990		327,767		336,813		333,416
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of deferred income tax expense
(benefit) of $107,272 at 2011 and $88,289 at 2010		199,219		163,966
(benefit) of $97,517 at 2012 and $94,118 at 2011						181,103		174,790
Retained earnings		2,547,282		2,636,008		2,773,564		2,433,187
Total stockholder's equity		3,077,491		3,127,741		3,291,480		2,941,393
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY	$	14,472,434	$	13,869,433	$	14,281,721	$	14,349,180

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011			2012			2011
	(unaudited)						(unaudited)						(unaudited)						(unaudited)
REVENUES:
Premiums earned	$	452,050		$	442,724		$	911,443		$	856,858		$	438,470		$	452,050		$	872,181		$	911,443
Net investment income		84,459			89,346			171,591			174,453			74,206			84,459			155,448			171,591
Net realized capital gains (losses):
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities		-			-			(13,611	)		-			(467	)		-			(6,141	)		(13,611	)
Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities
transferred to other comprehensive income (loss)		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-
Other net realized capital gains (losses)		(68,184	)		(95,473	)		(14,097	)		(100,780	)		83,056			(68,184	)		264,871			(14,097	)
Total net realized capital gains (losses)		(68,184	)		(95,473	)		(27,708	)		(100,780	)		82,589			(68,184	)		258,730			(27,708	)
Other income (expense)		(11,568	)		8,709			(11,536	)		13,821			25,428			(11,568	)		19,174			(11,536	)
Total revenues		456,757			445,306			1,043,790			944,352			620,693			456,757			1,305,533			1,043,790

CLAIMS AND EXPENSES:
Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses		312,809			314,749			865,837			741,753			293,577			312,809			543,974			865,837
Commission, brokerage, taxes and fees		80,305			88,197			168,817			156,038			93,365			80,305			180,856			168,817
Other underwriting expenses		39,223			35,371			77,440			68,085			41,099			39,223			80,613			77,440
Corporate expenses		1,165			1,463			2,355			3,689			1,732			1,165			3,298			2,355
Interest, fee and bond issue cost amortization expense		12,695			12,722			25,377			29,062			12,683			12,695			25,379			25,377
Total claims and expenses		446,197			452,502			1,139,826			998,627			442,456			446,197			834,120			1,139,826

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES		10,560			(7,196	)		(96,036	)		(54,275	)		178,237			10,560			471,413			(96,036	)
Income tax expense (benefit)		1,753			(24,083	)		(7,310	)		(26,233	)		52,584			1,753			131,036			(7,310	)

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	8,807		$	16,887		$	(88,726	)	$	(28,042	)	$	125,653		$	8,807		$	340,377		$	(88,726	)

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		34,236			24,799			35,253			36,545
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax :
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) ("URA(D)") on securities arising during the period														(936	)		30,687			5,475			3,798
Less: reclassification adjustment for realized losses (gains) included in net income (loss)														(1,278	)		3,885			1,435			20,710
Total URA(D) on securities arising during the period														(2,214	)		34,572			6,910			24,508
Foreign currency translation adjustments														(7,861	)		(1,082	)		(2,564	)		9,253
Pension adjustments														983			746			1,967			1,492
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax														(9,092	)		34,236			6,313			35,253

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)	$	43,043		$	41,686		$	(53,473	)	$	8,503		$	116,561		$	43,043		$	346,690		$	(53,473	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF

CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY

		Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
		June 30,				June 30,						June 30,					June 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)		2011		2010		2011			2010			2012			2011		2012		2011
		(unaudited)				(unaudited)						(unaudited)					(unaudited)
COMMON STOCK (shares outstanding):
Balance, beginning of period			1,000		1,000		1,000			1,000			1,000			1,000		1,000		1,000
Balance, end of period			1,000		1,000		1,000			1,000			1,000			1,000		1,000		1,000

ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL:
Balance, beginning of period		$	329,356	$	322,459	$	327,767		$	321,185		$	335,042		$	329,356	$	333,416	$	327,767
Share-based compensation plans			1,634		1,697		3,223			2,971			1,771			1,634		3,397		3,223
Balance, end of period			330,990		324,156		330,990			324,156			336,813			330,990		336,813		330,990

ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS),
NET OF DEFERRED INCOME TAXES:
Balance, beginning of period			164,983		178,724		163,966			166,978			190,195			164,983		174,790		163,966
Net increase (decrease) during the period			34,236		24,799		35,253			36,545			(9,092	)		34,236		6,313		35,253
Balance, end of period			199,219		203,523		199,219			203,523			181,103			199,219		181,103		199,219

RETAINED EARNINGS:
Balance, beginning of period			2,538,475		2,325,682		2,636,008			2,370,611			2,647,911			2,538,475		2,433,187		2,636,008
Net income (loss)			8,807		16,887		(88,726	)		(28,042	)		125,653			8,807		340,377		(88,726	)
Balance, end of period			2,547,282		2,342,569		2,547,282			2,342,569			2,773,564			2,547,282		2,773,564		2,547,282

TOTAL STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY, END OF PERIOD		$	3,077,491	$	2,870,248	$	3,077,491		$	2,870,248		$	3,291,480		$	3,077,491	$	3,291,480	$	3,077,491

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.	The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

EVEREST REINSURANCE HOLDINGS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

		Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
		June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)		2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011			2012			2011
		(unaudited)						(unaudited)						(unaudited)						(unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income (loss)		$	8,807		$	16,887		$	(88,726	)	$	(28,042	)	$	125,653		$	8,807		$	340,377		$	(88,726	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:	Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Decrease (increase) in premiums receivable			(17,216	)		21,553			(128,544	)		24,883			66,341			(17,216	)		103,547			(128,544	)
Decrease (increase) in funds held by reinsureds, net			(8,008	)		(18,472	)		(7,812	)		(16,262	)		22,830			(8,008	)		(17,524	)		(7,812	)
Decrease (increase) in reinsurance receivables			(49,828	)		(18,620	)		(355,899	)		(227,797	)		22,823			(49,828	)		30,491			(355,899	)
Decrease (increase) in income taxes receivable															5,526			53,336			4,628			(1,044	)
Decrease (increase) in deferred tax asset			(19,965	)		(46,121	)		14,349			(54,415	)		38,950			(19,965	)		113,624			14,349
Decrease (increase) in prepaid reinsurance premiums			38,227			2,059			62,163			(16,192	)		90,785			38,227			95,321			62,163
Increase (decrease) in reserve for losses and loss adjustment expenses			121,207			(12,762	)		586,366			290,352			(131,146	)		121,207			(297,135	)		586,366
Increase (decrease) in unearned premiums			(80,213	)		(10,237	)		(103,362	)		7,142			(190,678	)		(80,213	)		(201,002	)		(103,362	)
Increase (decrease) in other net payable to reinsurers															38,445			36,022			42,550			88,804
Change in equity adjustments in limited partnerships			(13,939	)		(8,882	)		(32,354	)		(18,296	)		(8,765	)		(13,939	)		(20,050	)		(32,354	)
Change in other assets and liabilities, net			32,717			16,395			103,464			142,621			54,962			(56,641	)		99,344			15,704
Non-cash compensation expense			1,674			1,685			3,054			2,880			1,628			1,674			3,244			3,054
Amortization of bond premium (accrual of bond discount)			3,422			1,071			6,914			4,617			5,335			3,422			9,609			6,914
Amortization of underwriting discount on senior notes			12			11			24			53			12			12			25			24
Net realized capital (gains) losses			68,184			95,473			27,708			100,780			(82,589	)		68,184			(258,730	)		27,708
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities			85,081			40,040			87,345			212,324			60,112			85,081			48,319			87,345

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from fixed maturities matured/called - available for sale, at market value			156,078			136,606			263,533			308,869			172,534			156,078			374,721			263,533
Proceeds from fixed maturities matured/called - available for sale, at fair value			5,875			-			12,775			-			-			5,875			-			12,775
Proceeds from fixed maturities sold - available for sale, at market value			270,169			206,078			786,890			371,563			92,165			270,169			176,301			786,890
Proceeds from fixed maturities sold - available for sale, at fair value			17,168			6,115			50,120			8,612			1,862			17,168			61,143			50,120
Proceeds from equity securities sold - available for sale, at market value			-			-			27,096			-			-			-			-			27,096
Proceeds from equity securities sold - available for sale, at fair value			37,000			51,400			89,696			72,742			52,340			37,000			291,880			89,696
Distributions from other invested assets			28,416			15,715			89,775			23,880			9,522			28,416			15,383			89,775
Cost of fixed maturities acquired - available for sale, at market value			(236,991	)		(280,050	)		(709,796	)		(555,576	)		(369,223	)		(236,991	)		(662,071	)		(709,796	)
Cost of fixed maturities acquired - available for sale, at fair value			(7,148	)		(9,487	)		(15,224	)		(23,681	)		(2,382	)		(7,148	)		(5,506	)		(15,224	)
Cost of equity securities acquired - available for sale, at market value			-			-			(27,059	)		-			-			-			-			(27,059	)
Cost of equity securities acquired - available for sale, at fair value			(212,606	)		(30,140	)		(339,271	)		(50,879	)		(75,674	)		(212,606	)		(180,888	)		(339,271	)
Cost of other invested assets acquired			(22,064	)		(8,634	)		(45,078	)		(18,374	)		(12,130	)		(22,064	)		(23,766	)		(45,078	)
Cost of other invested assets acquired, at fair value			-			(200,079	)		(37,611	)		(247,111	)		-			-			-			(37,611	)
Cost of businesses acquired			-			-			(63,100	)		-			-			-			-			(63,100	)
Net change in short-term investments			(196,488	)		(2,164	)		(47,185	)		9,921			64,548			(196,488	)		(157,589	)		(47,185	)
Net change in unsettled securities transactions			188,839			(51,843	)		44,841			(35,520	)		(24,657	)		188,839			5,112			44,841
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities			28,248			(166,483	)		80,402			(135,554	)		(91,095	)		28,248			(105,280	)		80,402

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Tax benefit from share-based compensation			(40	)		12			169			91			143			(40	)		153			169
Net cost of senior notes maturing			-			-			-			(200,000	)
Revolving credit borrowings			-			133,000			(10,000	)		133,000			-			-			-			(10,000	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			(40	)		133,012			(9,831	)		(66,909	)		143			(40	)		153			(9,831	)

EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH			5,711			(7,459	)		12,357			(10,494	)		(8,174	)		5,711			14,274			12,357

Net increase (decrease) in cash			119,000			(890	)		170,273			(633	)		(39,014	)		119,000			(42,534	)		170,273
Cash, beginning of period			169,365			107,737			118,092			107,480			344,747			169,365			348,267			118,092
Cash, end of period		$	288,365		$	106,847		$	288,365		$	106,847		$	305,733		$	288,365		$	305,733		$	288,365

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash transactions:
Income taxes paid (recovered)		$	(31,557	)	$	(53,156	)	$	(20,765	)	$	(49,390	)	$	4,754		$	(31,557	)	$	9,379		$	(20,765	)
Interest paid			19,838			19,866			25,041			33,765			19,825			19,838			25,042			25,041

Non-cash transaction:
Net assets acquired and liabilities assumed from business acquisitions			-			-			19,130			-			-			-			-			19,130

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011

1. GENERAL

As used in this document, “Holdings” means Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc., a Delaware company and direct subsidiary of Everest Underwriting Group (Ireland) Limited (“Holdings Ireland”); “Group” means Everest Re Group, Ltd. (Holdings Ireland’s parent); “Bermuda Re” means Everest Reinsurance (Bermuda), Ltd., a subsidiary of Group; “Everest Re” means Everest Reinsurance Company and its subsidiaries, a subsidiary of Holdings (unless the context otherwise requires); and the “Company” means Holdings and its subsidiaries.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the results on an interim basis. Certain financial information, which is normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), has been omitted since it is not required for interim reporting purposes. The December 31, ~~2010~~2011 consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 ~~2009~~ and ~~2008~~2009 included in the Company’s most recent Form 10-K filing.

All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Certain reclassifications and format changes have been made to prior ~~years'~~period amounts to conform to the ~~2011~~current period presentation.

Application of Recently Issued Accounting Standard Changes

~~Financial Accounting Standards Board Launched Accounting Codification.~~Intangibles-Goodwill or Other. In ~~June 2009,~~September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ~~issued~~amended the authoritative guidance ~~establishing~~for disclosures on Goodwill Impairment. The amendment allows an entity first to assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the ~~FASB Accounting Standards Codification~~TM ~~(“Codification”)~~fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis in determining whether it is necessary to perform the ~~single source~~two-step goodwill impairment test. This guidance is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company implemented this guidance as of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by non-governmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative.January 1, 2012.

~~Following~~Presentation of Comprehensive Income. In June 2011, FASB issued amendments to existing guidance to provide two alternatives for the ~~Codification,~~presentation of comprehensive income. Components of net income and comprehensive income can either be presented within a single, continuous financial statement or be presented in two separate but consecutive financial statements. The Company has chosen to present the ~~FASB will no longer issue new standards~~components of net income and comprehensive income in ~~the form~~a single, continuous financial statement. The guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company implemented this guidance as of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, the FASB will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve to update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification.January 1, 2012.

Common Fair Value Measurement. In May 2011, FASB issued amendments to existing guidance to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements between GAAP isand International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments change wording used to describe many GAAP fair value measurement requirements and disclosures. FASB does not ~~intended~~intend for the amendments to ~~be changed as~~cause a ~~result~~change in application of ~~the FASB’s Codification, but it will change the way the~~fair value accounting guidance. The guidance is ~~organized and presented. As a result, these changes will have a significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in the accounting policies~~effective for ~~financial statements issued for interim and annual~~reporting periods ~~ending~~beginning after ~~September~~December 15, ~~2009.~~2011. The ~~Company’s adoption of~~Company implemented this guidance ~~impacts the way the Company references U.S. GAAP accounting standards in the financial statements and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.~~prospectively as of January 1, 2012.

Table of Contents

Treatment of Insurance Contract Acquisition Costs. In October 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for the accounting for costs associated with acquiring or renewing insurance contracts. The guidance identifies the incremental direct costs of contract acquisition and costs directly related to acquisition activities that should be capitalized. This guidance is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company ~~will adopt~~implemented this guidance ~~prospectively,~~ as of January 1, ~~2012.~~

~~Subsequent Events.~~ ~~In May 2009,~~2012 and determined that $7,215 thousand of previously deferrable acquisition costs will be expensed during 2012 and the FASB issued authoritative guidance for subsequent events, which was later modified in February 2010, that addresses the accounting for and disclosure of subsequent events not addressed in other applicable U.S. GAAP. The Company implemented the new disclosure requirement beginning with the secondfirst quarter of ~~2009~~2013, including $1,958 thousand and ~~included it~~$3,371 thousand of previously deferrable acquisition costs expensed in the ~~Notes to Consolidated Interim Financial Statements.~~three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. If the guidance had been applicable for the prior periods, the Company would have expensed $1,823 thousand and $3,442 thousand of deferrable acquisition costs during the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively.

Improving Disclosures About Fair Value ~~Measurements.~~Measurements. In January 2010, the FASB amended the authoritative guidance for disclosures on fair value measurements. Effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, the guidance requires a new separate disclosure for: significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and 2 and the reasons for the transfers; and provided clarification on existing disclosures to include: fair value measurement disclosures by class of assets and liabilities and disclosure on valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. The Company implemented this guidance effective January 1, 2010. Effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010, the guidance requires another new separate disclosure in regards to Level 3 fair value measurements in that, the period activity will present separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. Comparative disclosures shall be required only for periods ending after initial adoption. The Company implemented this guidance beginning with the third quarter of 2010.

~~Other-Than-Temporary Impairments on Investment Securities.~~ In April 2009, the FASB revised the authoritative guidance for the recognition and presentation of other-than-temporary impairments. This new guidance amends the recognition guidance for other-than-temporary impairments of debt securities and expands the financial statement disclosures for other-than-temporary impairments on debt and equity securities. For available for sale debt securities that the Company has no intent to sell and more likely than not will not be required to sell prior to recovery, only the credit loss component of the impairment would be recognized in earnings, while the rest of the fair value loss would be recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The Company adopted this guidance effective April 1, 2009. Upon adoption the Company recognized a cumulative-effect adjustment increase in retained earnings and decrease in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as follows:

(Dollars in thousands)
Cumulative-effect adjustment, gross $ 23,846
Tax (8,346 )
Cumulative-effect adjustment, net $ 15,500

~~Table of Contents~~

3. INVESTMENTS

The amortized cost, market value and gross unrealized appreciation and depreciation of available for sale, fixed maturity and equity security investments, carried at market value, are as follows for the periods indicated:

	At June 30, 2011									At June 30, 2012
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market		Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Appreciation		Depreciation			Value		Cost		Appreciation		Depreciation			Value
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	84,214	$	1,878	$	(1,676	)	$	84,416	$	77,857	$	1,891	$	(465	)	$	79,283
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		2,110,206		109,724		(5,985	)		2,213,945		1,353,400		93,071		(245	)		1,446,226
Corporate securities		895,793		42,589		(12,572	)		925,810		1,304,122		54,302		(8,813	)		1,349,611
Asset-backed securities		40,383		685		(16	)		41,052		48,367		1,356		-			49,723
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		41,840		7,787		(727	)		48,900		46,126		7,570		(926	)		52,770
Agency residential		321,195		17,596		(17	)		338,774		542,268		13,669		(1,347	)		554,590
Non-agency residential		27,404		534		(93	)		27,845		2,543		385		(57	)		2,871
Foreign government securities		874,577		43,523		(11,291	)		906,809		748,791		53,999		(2,773	)		800,017
Foreign corporate securities		703,274		26,878		(17,801	)		712,351		867,703		35,111		(9,726	)		893,088
Total fixed maturity securities	$	5,098,886	$	251,194	$	(50,178	)	$	5,299,902	$	4,991,177	$	261,354	$	(24,352	)	$	5,228,179
Equity securities	$	15	$	-	$	(3	)	$	12	$	15	$	-	$	(2	)	$	13

At December 31, 2010
Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Market
(Dollars in thousands) Cost Appreciation Depreciation Value
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations $ 153,263 $ 2,450 $ (5,146 ) $ 150,567
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions 2,809,514 116,920 (24,929 ) 2,901,505
Corporate securities 688,938 42,522 (9,775 ) 721,685
Asset-backed securities 19,860 705 (14 ) 20,551
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial 31,887 7,618 - 39,505
Agency residential 355,928 13,975 (212 ) 369,691
Non-agency residential 29,373 912 (317 ) 29,968
Foreign government securities 731,930 32,678 (15,567 ) 749,041
Foreign corporate securities 617,666 20,939 (21,178 ) 617,427
Total fixed maturity securities $ 5,438,359 $ 238,719 $ (77,138 ) $ 5,599,940
Equity securities $ 15 $ - $ (2 ) $ 13

Table of Contents

	At December 31, 2011
	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Appreciation		Depreciation			Value
Fixed maturity securities
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	77,351	$	2,475	$	(287	)	$	79,539
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		1,558,615		102,815		(525	)		1,660,905
Corporate securities		1,200,941		45,070		(17,776	)		1,228,235
Asset-backed securities		44,351		758		(6	)		45,103
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		41,953		7,187		(1,266	)		47,874
Agency residential		528,946		16,209		(1,762	)		543,393
Non-agency residential		24,139		470		(320	)		24,289
Foreign government securities		733,814		57,437		(2,602	)		788,649
Foreign corporate securities		670,544		29,421		(10,924	)		689,041
Total fixed maturity securities	$	4,880,654	$	261,842	$	(35,468	)	$	5,107,028
Equity securities	$	15	$	-	$	(5	)	$	10

The $800,017 thousand of foreign government securities at June 30, 2012 included $85,358 thousand of European sovereign securities. Approximately 48.1%, 15.7%, 12.2%, 7.2% and 5.6% of European Sovereign Securities represented securities held in the governments of France, the United Kingdom, Sweden, Netherlands and Austria, respectively. No other countries represented more than 5% of the European sovereign securities. The Company held no sovereign securities of Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece or Spain at June 30, 2012.

In accordance with FASB guidance, the Company reclassified the non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairments from retained earnings into accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), on April 1, 2009. The table below presents the pre-tax cumulative unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on those corporate securities, for the periods indicated:

(Dollars in thousands)		At June 30, 2011				At December 31, 2010				At June 30, 2012				At December 31, 2011
Pre-tax cumulative unrealized appreciation (depreciation)		$	828			$	823			$	566			$	635

~~Table of Contents~~

The amortized cost and market value of fixed maturity securities are shown in the following table by contractual maturity. Mortgage-backed securities are generally more likely to be prepaid than other fixed maturity securities. As the stated maturity of such securities may not be indicative of actual maturities, the totals for mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities are shown separately.

	At June 30, 2011				At December 31, 2010				At June 30, 2012				At December 31, 2011
	Amortized		Market		Amortized		Market		Amortized		Market		Amortized		Market
(Dollars in thousands)	Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value		Cost		Value
Fixed maturity securities – available for sale
Due in one year or less	$	240,540	$	244,567	$	212,728	$	207,739	$	367,937	$	366,220	$	224,406	$	223,507
Due after one year through five years		1,810,582		1,858,872		1,642,227		1,681,497		2,197,306		2,274,862		2,055,299		2,129,437
Due after five years through ten years		1,119,257		1,169,942		1,203,497		1,253,609		891,434		944,813		955,253		1,009,893
Due after ten years		1,497,685		1,569,950		1,942,859		1,997,380		895,196		982,330		1,006,307		1,083,532
Asset-backed securities		40,383		41,052		19,860		20,551		48,367		49,723		44,351		45,103
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		41,840		48,900		31,887		39,505		46,126		52,770		41,953		47,874
Agency residential		321,195		338,774		355,928		369,691		542,268		554,590		528,946		543,393
Non-agency residential		27,404		27,845		29,373		29,968		2,543		2,871		24,139		24,289
Total fixed maturity securities	$	5,098,886	$	5,299,902	$	5,438,359	$	5,599,940	$	4,991,177	$	5,228,179	$	4,880,654	$	5,107,028

Table of Contents

The changes in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) for the Company’s investments are derived from the following sources for the periods as indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011			2012			2011
Increase (decrease) during the period between the market value and cost
of investments carried at market value, and deferred taxes thereon:
Fixed maturity securities	$	56,368		$	46,864		$	39,430		$	50,017		$	(3,358	)	$	56,368		$	10,697		$	39,430
Fixed maturity securities, cumulative other-than-temporary impairment adjustment		(15	)		(470	)		5			2,582
Fixed maturity securities, other-than-temporary impairment														(49	)		(15	)		(69	)		5
Equity securities		-			-			-			(1	)		1			-			3			-
Other invested assets		(3,165	)		(17	)		(1,730	)		496			-			(3,165	)		-			(1,730	)
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation), pre-tax		53,188			46,377			37,705			53,094			(3,406	)		53,188			10,631			37,705
Deferred tax benefit (expense)		(18,621	)		(16,396	)		(13,195	)		(17,679	)		1,175			(18,621	)		(3,745	)		(13,195	)
Deferred tax benefit (expense), cumulative other-than-temporary impairment adjustment		5			164			(2	)		(904	)
Deferred tax benefit (expense), other-than-temporary impairment														17			5			24			(2	)
Change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation),
net of deferred taxes, included in shareholders’ equity	$	34,572		$	30,145		$	24,508		$	34,511
net of deferred taxes, included in stockholder's equity													$	(2,214	)	$	34,572		$	6,910		$	24,508

The Company frequently reviews all of its fixed maturity, available for sale securities ~~investment portfolio~~ for declines in market value and focuses its attention on securities whose fair value has fallen below 80% of their amortized cost at the time of review. The Company then assesses whether the decline in value is temporary or other-than-temporary. In making its assessment, the Company evaluates the current market and interest rate environment as well as specific issuer information. Generally, a change in a security’s value caused by a change in the market, or interest rate or foreign exchange environment does not constitute an other-than-temporary impairment, but rather a temporary decline in market value. Temporary declines in market value are recorded as unrealized losses in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). If the Company determines that the decline is other-than-temporary and the Company does not have the intent to sell the security; and it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, the carrying value of the investment is written down to fair value. The fair value adjustment that is credit or foreign exchange related is recorded in net realized capital gains (losses) in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). The fair value adjustment that is non-credit related is recorded as a component of other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, and is included in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets. The Company’s assessments are based on the issuers current and expected future financial position, timeliness with respect to interest and/or principal payments, speed of repayments and any applicable credit enhancements or breakeven constant default rates on mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities, as well as relevant information provided by rating agencies, investment advisors and analysts.

~~Table of Contents~~

Retrospective adjustments are employed to recalculate the values of asset-backed securities. All of the Company’s asset-backed and mortgage-backed securities have a pass-through structure. Each acquisition lot is reviewed to recalculate the effective yield. The recalculated effective yield is used to derive a book value as if the new yield were applied at the time of acquisition. Outstanding principal factors from the time of acquisition to the adjustment date are used to calculate the prepayment history for all applicable securities. Conditional prepayment rates, computed with life to date factor histories and weighted average maturities, are used in the calculation of projected ~~and~~ prepayments for pass-through security types.

Table of Contents

The ~~table~~tables below ~~displays~~display the aggregate market value and gross unrealized depreciation of fixed maturity and equity securities, by security type and contractual maturity, in each case subdivided according to length of time that individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for the periods indicated:

	Duration of Unrealized Loss at June 30, 2011 By Security Type															Duration of Unrealized Loss at June 30, 2012 By Security Type
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total					Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross
			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation
Fixed maturity securities - available for sale
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	19,681	$	(1,153	)	$	3,417	$	(523	)	$	23,098	$	(1,676	)	$	-	$	-		$	6,145	$	(465	)	$	6,145	$	(465	)
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		34,916		(1,152	)		55,794		(4,833	)		90,710		(5,985	)		712		(9	)		5,793		(236	)		6,505		(245	)
Corporate securities		183,948		(5,707	)		82,476		(6,865	)		266,424		(12,572	)		173,355		(1,880	)		145,478		(6,933	)		318,833		(8,813	)
Asset-backed securities		5,089		(16	)		-		-			5,089		(16	)		-		-			-		-			-		-
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		9,716		(727	)		-		-			9,716		(727	)		-		-			9,750		(926	)		9,750		(926	)
Agency residential		1,485		(11	)		1,258		(6	)		2,743		(17	)		203,445		(1,342	)		220		(5	)		203,665		(1,347	)
Non-agency residential		-		-			830		(93	)		830		(93	)		-		-			514		(57	)		514		(57	)
Foreign government securities		50,741		(1,797	)		78,372		(9,494	)		129,113		(11,291	)		35,704		(307	)		35,192		(2,466	)		70,896		(2,773	)
Foreign corporate securities		116,829		(7,890	)		57,756		(9,911	)		174,585		(17,801	)		105,651		(1,483	)		75,124		(8,243	)		180,775		(9,726	)
Total fixed maturity securities	$	422,405	$	(18,453	)	$	279,903	$	(31,725	)	$	702,308	$	(50,178	)	$	518,867	$	(5,021	)	$	278,216	$	(19,331	)	$	797,083	$	(24,352	)
Equity securities		-		-			12		(3	)		12		(3	)		-		-			13		(2	)		13		(2	)
Total	$	422,405	$	(18,453	)	$	279,915	$	(31,728	)	$	702,320	$	(50,181	)	$	518,867	$	(5,021	)	$	278,229	$	(19,333	)	$	797,096	$	(24,354	)

	Duration of Unrealized Loss at June 30, 2011 By Maturity															Duration of Unrealized Loss at June 30, 2012 By Maturity
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total					Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross					Gross
			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation
Fixed maturity securities
Due in one year or less	$	7,796	$	(549	)	$	16,599	$	(3,045	)	$	24,395	$	(3,594	)	$	12,341	$	(149	)	$	41,659	$	(6,368	)	$	54,000	$	(6,517	)
Due in one year through five years		177,973		(9,464	)		127,966		(12,043	)		305,939		(21,507	)		181,847		(2,011	)		153,125		(9,294	)		334,972		(11,305	)
Due in five years through ten years		177,091		(5,705	)		54,976		(5,852	)		232,067		(11,557	)		114,520		(1,415	)		62,411		(2,111	)		176,931		(3,526	)
Due after ten years		43,255		(1,981	)		78,274		(10,686	)		121,529		(12,667	)		6,714		(104	)		10,537		(570	)		17,251		(674	)
Asset-backed securities		5,089		(16	)		-		-			5,089		(16	)		-		-			-		-			-		-
Mortgage-backed securities		11,201		(738	)		2,088		(99	)		13,289		(837	)		203,445		(1,342	)		10,484		(988	)		213,929		(2,330	)
Total fixed maturity securities	$	422,405	$	(18,453	)	$	279,903	$	(31,725	)	$	702,308	$	(50,178	)	$	518,867	$	(5,021	)	$	278,216	$	(19,331	)	$	797,083	$	(24,352	)

The aggregate market value and gross unrealized losses related to investments in an unrealized loss position at June 30, ~~2011~~2012 were ~~$702,320~~$797,096 thousand and ~~$50,181~~$24,354 thousand, respectively. There were no unrealized losses on a single issuer that exceeded ~~0.1%~~0.03% of the market value of the fixed maturity securities at June 30, ~~2011.~~2012. In addition, as indicated on the above table, there was no significant concentration of unrealized losses in any one market sector. The ~~$18,453~~$5,021 thousand of unrealized losses related to fixed maturity securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than one year were generally comprised of ~~highly rated municipal, U.S. and foreign government and~~ domestic and foreign corporate securities as well as agency residential mortgage-backed securities. Of these unrealized losses, ~~$16,614~~$2,909 thousand were related to securities that were rated investment grade by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The majority of the unrealized losses related to foreign government and foreign corporate securities are due to currency exchange rate movements as opposed to market value movements. The non-investment grade securities

~~Table of Contents~~

~~with unrealized losses were mainly comprised of corporate securities. The $31,725~~$19,331 thousand of unrealized losses related to fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position for more than one year related primarily to domestic and foreign corporate ~~and~~securities, foreign government securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities. Of these unrealized losses, ~~$27,807~~$15,971 thousand were related to securities that were rated investment grade by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The ~~majority of the~~non-investment grade securities with unrealized losses ~~related to foreign government and foreign~~were mainly comprised of corporate securities, ~~are due to currency exchange~~with the majority representing a large number of short duration, floating interest rate ~~movements as opposed to market value movements.~~bank loan securities. The gross unrealized depreciation ~~greater than 12 months~~ for mortgage-backed securities included ~~$43~~$57 thousand related to sub-prime and alt-A loans. In all instances, there were no projected cash ~~flows were sufficient~~flow shortfalls to recover the full book value of the investments and the related interest obligations. The mortgage-backed securities still have excess credit coverage and are current on interest and principal payments. ~~Unrealized losses at June 30, 2011 are comparable with unrealized losses at December 31, 2010.~~

The table below displays the aggregate market value and gross unrealized depreciation of fixed maturity and equity securities, by security type and contractual maturity, in each case subdivided according to length of time that individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for the periods indicated:

Duration of Unrealized Loss at December 31, 2010 By Security Type
Less than 12 months Greater than 12 months Total
Gross Gross Gross
Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands) Market Value Depreciation Market Value Depreciation Market Value Depreciation
Fixed maturity securities - available for sale
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations $ 47,985 $ (1,916 ) $ 43,264 $ (3,230 ) $ 91,249 $ (5,146 )
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions 336,522 (9,519 ) 171,812 (15,410 ) 508,334 (24,929 )
Corporate securities 74,389 (2,715 ) 33,109 (7,060 ) 107,498 (9,775 )
Asset-backed securities 3,900 (14 ) - - 3,900 (14 )
Mortgage-backed securities
Agency residential 20,867 (212 ) - - 20,867 (212 )
Non-agency residential - - 22,439 (317 ) 22,439 (317 )
Foreign government securities 92,123 (3,776 ) 124,807 (11,791 ) 216,930 (15,567 )
Foreign corporate securities 120,294 (5,512 ) 121,304 (15,666 ) 241,598 (21,178 )
Total fixed maturity securities $ 696,080 $ (23,664 ) $ 516,735 $ (53,474 ) $ 1,212,815 $ (77,138 )
Equity securities - - 13 (2 ) 13 (2 )
Total $ 696,080 $ (23,664 ) $ 516,748 $ (53,476 ) $ 1,212,828 $ (77,140 )

Duration of Unrealized Loss at December 31, 2010 By Maturity
Less than 12 months Greater than 12 months Total
Gross Gross Gross
Unrealized Unrealized Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands) Market Value Depreciation Market Value Depreciation Market Value Depreciation
Fixed maturity securities
Due in one year or less $ 5,982 $ (319 ) $ 48,233 $ (8,089 ) $ 54,215 $ (8,408 )
Due in one year through five years 186,524 (9,059 ) 129,197 (11,559 ) 315,721 (20,618 )
Due in five years through ten years 139,896 (4,356 ) 92,692 (8,215 ) 232,588 (12,571 )
Due after ten years 338,911 (9,704 ) 224,174 (25,294 ) 563,085 (34,998 )
Asset-backed securities 3,900 (14 ) - - 3,900 (14 )
Mortgage-backed securities 20,867 (212 ) 22,439 (317 ) 43,306 (529 )
Total fixed maturity securities $ 696,080 $ (23,664 ) $ 516,735 $ (53,474 ) $ 1,212,815 $ (77,138 )

The aggregate market value and gross unrealized losses related to investments in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2010 were $1,212,828 thousand and $77,140 thousand, respectively. There were no unrealized losses on a single issuer that exceeded 0.09% of the market value of the fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2010. In addition, as indicated on the above table, there was no significant concentration of unrealized losses in any one market sector. The $23,664 thousand of unrealized losses related to fixed maturity securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than one year were generally comprised of highly rated municipal, U.S. government, foreign government and domestic and foreign corporate securities. Of these unrealized losses, $23,424 thousand were related to securities that

109

Table of Contents

were rated investment grade by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The $53,474 thousand of unrealized losses related to fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position for more than one year also related primarily to highly rated U.S. government, domestic and foreign corporate, foreign government and municipal securities. Of these unrealized losses, $48,165 thousand related to securities that were rated investment grade by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The non-investment grade securities with unrealized losses were mainly comprised of corporate securities. The gross unrealized depreciation greater than 12 months for mortgage-backed securities included $32 thousand related to sub-prime and alt-A loans. In all instances, projected cash flows were sufficient to recover the full book value of the investments and the related interest obligations.

The Company, given the size of its investment portfolio and capital position, does not have the intent to sell these securities; and it is more likely than not that the Company will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis. In addition, all securities currently in an unrealized loss position are current with respect to principal and interest payments.

The tables below display the aggregate market value and gross unrealized depreciation of fixed maturity and equity securities, by security type and contractual maturity, in each case subdivided according to length of time that individual securities had been in a continuous unrealized loss position for the periods indicated:

	Duration of Unrealized Loss at December 31, 2011 By Security Type
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation
Fixed maturity securities - available for sale
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	-	$	-		$	3,452	$	(287	)	$	3,452	$	(287	)
Obligations of U.S. states and political subdivisions		-		-			7,518		(525	)		7,518		(525	)
Corporate securities		342,959		(8,449	)		75,998		(9,327	)		418,957		(17,776	)
Asset-backed securities		819		(6	)		-		-			819		(6	)
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		9,292		(1,266	)		-		-			9,292		(1,266	)
Agency residential		151,951		(1,695	)		7,199		(67	)		159,150		(1,762	)
Non-agency residential		41		-			20,693		(320	)		20,734		(320	)
Foreign government securities		12,777		(269	)		40,743		(2,333	)		53,520		(2,602	)
Foreign corporate securities		77,458		(2,025	)		94,182		(8,899	)		171,640		(10,924	)
Total fixed maturity securities	$	595,297	$	(13,710	)	$	249,785	$	(21,758	)	$	845,082	$	(35,468	)
Equity securities		-		-			10		(5	)		10		(5	)
Total	$	595,297	$	(13,710	)	$	249,795	$	(21,763	)	$	845,092	$	(35,473	)

	Duration of Unrealized Loss at December 31, 2011 By Maturity
	Less than 12 months					Greater than 12 months					Total
			Gross					Gross					Gross
			Unrealized					Unrealized					Unrealized
(Dollars in thousands)	Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation			Market Value		Depreciation
Fixed maturity securities
Due in one year or less	$	9,583	$	(59	)	$	26,204	$	(4,486	)	$	35,787	$	(4,545	)
Due in one year through five years		213,809		(4,754	)		137,972		(9,576	)		351,781		(14,330	)
Due in five years through ten years		186,061		(5,484	)		37,964		(2,391	)		224,025		(7,875	)
Due after ten years		23,741		(446	)		19,753		(4,918	)		43,494		(5,364	)
Asset-backed securities		819		(6	)		-		-			819		(6	)
Mortgage-backed securities		161,284		(2,961	)		27,892		(387	)		189,176		(3,348	)
Total fixed maturity securities	$	595,297	$	(13,710	)	$	249,785	$	(21,758	)	$	845,082	$	(35,468	)

The aggregate market value and gross unrealized losses related to investments in an unrealized loss position at December 31, 2011 were $845,092 thousand and $35,473 thousand, respectively. There were no unrealized losses on a single issuer that exceeded 0.09% of the market value of the fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2011. In addition, as indicated on the above table, there was no significant concentration of unrealized losses in any one market sector. The $13,710 thousand of unrealized losses related to fixed maturity securities that have been in an unrealized loss position for less than one year were generally comprised of domestic and foreign corporate securities as well as commercial and agency residential mortgage-backed securities. Of these unrealized losses, $5,635 thousand were related to securities that were rated investment grade by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The $21,758 thousand of unrealized losses related to fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position for more than one year related primarily to domestic and foreign corporate and foreign government securities. Of these unrealized losses, $15,880 thousand were related to securities that were rated investment grade by at least one nationally recognized statistical rating organization. The non-

Table of Contents

investment grade securities with unrealized losses were mainly comprised of corporate securities, with the majority representing a large number of short duration, floating interest rate bank loan securities. The gross unrealized depreciation for mortgage-backed securities included $56 thousand related to sub-prime and alt-A loans. In all instances, there were no projected cash flow shortfalls to recover the full book value of the investments and the related interest obligations. The mortgage-backed securities still have excess credit coverage and are current on interest and principal payments.

Other invested assets, at fair value, is comprised of common shares of the Company’s ultimate parent, Group. At June 30, 2012, the Company held 9,719,971 shares of Group representing 15.8% of the total outstanding shares.

The components of net investment income are presented in the table below for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011			2012			2011
Fixed maturity securities	$	59,139		$	75,862		$	119,758		$	149,417		$	53,932		$	59,139		$	108,753		$	119,758
Equity securities		6,468			2,618			11,640			5,022			10,127			6,468			20,432			11,640
Short-term investments and cash		387			75			594			152			300			387			428			594
Other invested assets
Limited partnerships		13,939			8,882			32,354			18,296			9,232			13,939			20,844			32,354
Dividends from Parent's shares		4,666			4,127			9,314			5,553			4,665			4,666			9,331			9,314
Other		4,126			330			4,723			702			(492	)		4,126			1,026			4,723
Total gross investment income		88,725			91,894			178,383			179,142			77,764			88,725			160,814			178,383
Interest debited (credited) and other investment expense		(4,266	)		(2,548	)		(6,792	)		(4,689	)		(3,558	)		(4,266	)		(5,366	)		(6,792	)
Total net investment income	$	84,459		$	89,346		$	171,591		$	174,453		$	74,206		$	84,459		$	155,448		$	171,591

The Company records results from limited partnership investments on the equity method of accounting with changes in value reported through net investment income. Due to the timing of receiving financial information from these partnerships, the results are generally reported on a one month or quarter lag. If the Company determines there has been a significant decline in value of a limited partnership during this lag period, a loss will be recorded in the period in which the Company indentifies the decline.

The Company had contractual commitments to invest up to an additional ~~$142,091~~$89,651 thousand in limited partnerships at June 30, ~~2011.~~2012. These commitments will be funded when called in accordance with the partnership agreements, which have investment periods that expire, unless extended, through 2016.

Table of Contents

The components of net realized capital gains (losses) are presented in the table below for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011			2012			2011
Fixed maturity securities, market value:
Other-than-temporary impairments	$	-		$	-		$	(13,611	)	$	-		$	(467	)	$	-		$	(6,141	)	$	(13,611	)
Gains (losses) from sales		(5,978	)		1,617			(18,288	)		840			2,432			(5,978	)		3,933			(18,288	)
Fixed maturity securities, fair value:
Gains (losses) from sales		565			190			(950	)		273
Gain (losses) from sales														(180	)		565			5,027			(950	)
Gains (losses) from fair value adjustments		(40	)		(2,518	)		(3,523	)		482			(1,706	)		(40	)		1,325			(3,523	)
Equity securities, market value:
Gains (losses) from sales		-			-			37			-			-			-			-			37
Equity securities, fair value:
Gains (losses) from sales		(206	)		(2,893	)		1,666			(999	)		(2,370	)		(206	)		19,947			1,666
Gains (losses) from fair value adjustments		(23	)		(30,017	)		38,107			(16,786	)		(21,748	)		(23	)		46,072			38,107
Other invested assets, fair value:
Gains (losses) from fair value adjustments		(62,500	)		(61,853	)		(31,145	)		(84,590	)		106,628			(62,500	)		188,567			(31,145	)
Short-term investment gains (losses)		(2	)		1			(1	)		-			-			(2	)		-			(1	)
Total net realized capital gains (losses)	$	(68,184	)	$	(95,473	)	$	(27,708	)	$	(100,780	)	$	82,589		$	(68,184	)	$	258,730		$	(27,708	)

The Company recorded as net realized capital gains (losses) in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) both fair value re-measurements and write-downs in the value of securities deemed to be impaired on an other-than-temporary basis as displayed in the table above. The Company had no other-than-temporary impaired securities where the impairment had both a credit and non-credit component.

The proceeds and split between gross gains and losses, from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities, are presented in the table below for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011			2012			2011
Proceeds from sales of fixed maturity securities	$	287,337		$	212,193		$	837,010		$	380,175		$	94,027		$	287,337		$	237,444		$	837,010
Gross gains from sales		3,316			5,545			17,582			7,321			3,679			3,316			12,667			17,582
Gross losses from sales		(8,729	)		(3,738	)		(36,820	)		(6,208	)		(1,427	)		(8,729	)		(3,707	)		(36,820	)

Proceeds from sales of equity secuities	$	37,000		$	51,400		$	116,792		$	72,742		$	52,340		$	37,000		$	291,880		$	116,792
Gross gains from sales		722			1,214			3,102			3,584			975			722			27,801			3,102
Gross losses from sales		(928	)		(4,107	)		(1,399	)		(4,583	)		(3,345	)		(928	)		(7,854	)		(1,399	)

Table of Contents

4. FAIR VALUE

The Company’s fixed maturity and equity securities are primarily managed by third party investment asset managers. The investment asset managers obtain prices from nationally recognized pricing services. These services seek to utilize market data and observations in their evaluation process. They use pricing applications that vary by asset class and incorporate available market information and when fixed maturity securities do not trade on a daily basis the services will apply available information through processes such as benchmark curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings and matrix pricing. In addition, they use model processes, such as the Option Adjusted Spread model to develop prepayment and interest rate scenarios for securities that have prepayment features.

In limited instances where prices are not provided by pricing services or in rare instances when a manager may not agree with the pricing service, price quotes on a non-binding basis are obtained from investment brokers. The investment asset managers do not make any changes to prices received from either the pricing services or the investment brokers. In addition, the investment asset managers have procedures in place to review the reasonableness of the prices from the service providers and may request verification of the prices. In addition, the Company continually performs analytical reviews of price changes and tests the prices on a random basis to an independent pricing source. No material variances were noted during these price validation procedures. In limited situations, where financial markets are inactive or illiquid, the Company may use its own assumptions about future cash flows and risk-adjusted discount rates to determine fair value. The Company made no such adjustments at June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010.~~December 31, 2011.

The Company internally manages a small public equity portfolio which had a fair value at June 30, 2012 of $42,751 thousand and all prices were obtained from publically published sources.

Equity securities in U.S. denominated currency are categorized as Level 1, Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets, since the securities are actively traded on an exchange and prices are based on quoted prices from the exchange. Equity securities traded on foreign exchanges are categorized as Level 2 due to potential foreign exchange adjustments to fair or market value.

Fixed maturity securities are generally categorized as Level 2, Significant Other Observable Inputs, since a particular security may not have traded but the pricing services are able to use valuation models with observable market inputs such as interest rate yield curves and prices for similar fixed maturity securities in terms of issuer, maturity and seniority. Valuations that are derived from techniques in which one or more of the significant inputs are unobservable (including assumptions about risk) are categorized as Level 3, Significant Unobservable Inputs. These securities include broker priced securities.

As of June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, all Level 3 fixed maturity securities, were priced using single non-binding broker quotes since prices for these securities were not provided by normal pricing service companies. The single broker quotes are provided by market makers or broker-dealers who are recognized as market participants in the markets in which they are providing the quotes. The prices received from brokers are reviewed for reasonableness by our asset managers and management.

Other invested assets, at fair value, are categorized as Level 1, Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets, since the securities are shares of the Company’s parent, which are actively traded on an exchange and the price is based on a quoted price.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the fair value measurement levels for all assets, which the Company has recorded at fair value (fair and market value) as of the period indicated:

			Fair Value Measurement Using:								Fair Value Measurement Using:
			Quoted Prices								Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant						in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant				Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable				Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs				Assets		Inputs		Inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2011		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		June 30, 2012		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Fixed maturities, market value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	84,416	$	-	$	84,416	$	-	$	79,283	$	-	$	79,283	$	-
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions		2,213,945		-		2,213,945		-		1,446,226		-		1,446,226		-
Corporate securities		925,810		-		925,810		-		1,349,611		-		1,349,611		-
Asset-backed securities		41,052		-		38,586		2,466		49,723		-		40,727		8,996
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		48,900		-		48,900		-		52,770		-		52,770		-
Agency residential		338,774		-		338,774		-		554,590		-		554,590		-
Non-agency residential		27,845		-		27,464		381		2,871		-		2,866		5
Foreign government securities		906,809		-		906,809		-		800,017		-		800,017		-
Foreign corporate securities		712,351		-		712,351		-		893,088		-		885,705		7,383
Total fixed maturities, market value		5,299,902		-		5,297,055		2,847		5,228,179		-		5,211,795		16,384

Fixed maturities, fair value		128,337		-		128,337		-		62,831		-		62,831		-
Equity securities, market value		12		12		-		-		13		13		-		-
Equity securities, fair value		972,802		899,146		73,656		-		1,163,570		1,039,029		124,541		-
Other invested assets, fair value		794,608		794,608		-		-		1,005,920		1,005,920		-		-

There were no ~~significant~~ transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2011.~~2012.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the fair value measurement levels for all assets, which the Company has recorded at fair value (fair and market value) as of the period indicated:

			Fair Value Measurement Using:								Fair Value Measurement Using:
			Quoted Prices								Quoted Prices
			in Active		Significant						in Active		Significant
			Markets for		Other		Significant				Markets for		Other		Significant
			Identical		Observable		Unobservable				Identical		Observable		Unobservable
			Assets		Inputs		Inputs				Assets		Inputs		Inputs
(Dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)		December 31, 2011		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Fixed maturities, market value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of
U.S. government agencies and corporations	$	150,567	$	-	$	150,567	$	-	$	79,539	$	-	$	79,539	$	-
Obligations of U.S. States and political subdivisions		2,901,505		-		2,901,505		-		1,660,905		-		1,660,905		-
Corporate securities		721,685		-		721,685		-		1,228,235		-		1,228,235		-
Asset-backed securities		20,551		-		19,590		961		45,103		-		29,057		16,046
Mortgage-backed securities
Commercial		39,505		-		39,505		-		47,874		-		47,874		-
Agency residential		369,691		-		369,691		-		543,393		-		543,393		-
Non-agency residential		29,968		-		29,510		458		24,289		-		24,282		7
Foreign government securities		749,041		-		749,041		-		788,649		-		788,649		-
Foreign corporate securities		617,427		-		613,792		3,635		689,041		-		686,505		2,536
Total fixed maturities, market value		5,599,940		-		5,594,886		5,054		5,107,028		-		5,088,439		18,589

Fixed maturities, fair value		180,482		-		180,482		-		113,606		-		113,606		-
Equity securities, market value		13		13		-		-		10		10		-		-
Equity securities, fair value		683,454		683,454		-		-		1,207,053		1,090,959		116,094		-
Other invested assets, fair value		788,142		788,142		-		-		817,352		817,352		-		-

The following tables present the activity under Level 3, fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs by asset type, for the periods indicated:

		Three Months Ended June 30, 2011												Six Months Ended June 30, 2011													Three Months Ended June 30, 2012												Six Months Ended June 30, 2012
		Asset-backed			Foreign			Non-agency						Asset-backed			Foreign			Non-agency							Asset-backed			Foreign			Non-agency						Asset-backed			Foreign			Non-agency
(Dollars in thousands)		Securities			Corporate			RMBS			Total			Securities			Corporate			RMBS			Total				Securities			Corporate			RMBS			Total			Securities			Corporate			RMBS			Total
Beginning balance		$	6,273		$	519		$	448		$	7,240		$	961		$	3,635		$	458		$	5,054			$	12,756		$	5,119		$	6		$	17,881		$	16,046		$	2,536		$	7		$	18,589
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets)			64			-			28			92			64			-			49			113				-			(16	)		1			(15	)		55			(19	)		2			38
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)			(84	)		-			(48	)		(132	)		(147	)		-			(48	)		(195	)			6			(13	)		(1	)		(8	)		338			112			(2	)		448
Purchases, issuances and settlements			(82	)		-			(47	)		(129	)		56			-			(78	)		(22	)			1,793			4,755			(1	)		6,547			4,468			7,216			(2	)		11,682
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3			(3,705	)		(519	)		-			(4,224	)		1,532			(3,635	)		-			(2,103	)			(5,559	)		(2,462	)		-			(8,021	)		(11,911	)		(2,462	)		-			(14,373	)
Ending balance		$	2,466		$	-		$	381		$	2,847		$	2,466		$	-		$	381		$	2,847			$	8,996		$	7,383		$	5		$	16,384		$	8,996		$	7,383		$	5		$	16,384

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included
in earnings (or changes in net assets) attributable to the
change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets
still held at the reporting date		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-			$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)	(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)																									(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Table of Contents

		Three Months Ended June 30, 2010										Six Months Ended June 30, 2010											Three Months Ended June 30, 2011												Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
		Corporate			Asset-backed		Non-agency					Corporate			Asset-backed		Non-agency						Asset-backed			Foreign			Non-agency						Asset-backed			Foreign			Non-agency
(Dollars in thousands)		Securities			Securities		RMBS			Total		Securities			Securities		RMBS			Total			Securities			Corporate			RMBS			Total			Securities			Corporate			RMBS			Total
Beginning balance		$	6,930		$	6,368	$	456		$	13,754	$	6,930		$	6,258	$	426		$	13,614		$	6,273		$	519		$	448		$	7,240		$	961		$	3,635		$	458		$	5,054
Total gains or (losses) (realized/unrealized)
Included in earnings (or changes in net assets)			(1	)		-		24			23		(1	)		-		49			48			64			-			28			92			64			-			49			113
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)			36			122		51			209		36			44		92			172			(84	)		-			(48	)		(132	)		(147	)		-			(48	)		(195	)
Purchases, issuances and settlements			-			72		(34	)		38		-			260		(70	)		190			(82	)		-			(47	)		(129	)		56			-			(78	)		(22	)
Transfers in and/or (out) of Level 3			-			-		-			-		-			-		-			-			(3,705	)		(519	)		-			(4,224	)		1,532			(3,635	)		-			(2,103	)
Ending balance		$	6,965		$	6,562	$	497		$	14,024	$	6,965		$	6,562	$	497		$	14,024		$	2,466		$	-		$	381		$	2,847		$	2,466		$	-		$	381		$	2,847

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included
in earnings (or changes in net assets) attributable to the
change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets
still held at the reporting date		$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)	(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)																					(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

5. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS

On ~~December 17, 2008, we~~October 14, 2011, the Company renewed ~~our~~its shelf registration statement on Form S-3ASR with the SEC, as a Well Known Seasoned Issuer. This shelf registration statement can be used by Group to register common shares, preferred shares, debt securities, warrants, share purchase contracts and share purchase units; by Holdings to register debt securities and by Everest Re Capital Trust III (“Capital Trust III”) to register trust preferred securities.

6. CONTINGENCIES

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is involved in lawsuits, arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures, the outcomes of which will determine the Company’s rights and obligations under insurance ~~reinsurance~~ and ~~other contractual~~reinsurance agreements. In some disputes, the Company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it. In other matters, the Company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights. These disputes arise from time to time and are ultimately resolved through both informal and formal means, including negotiated resolution, arbitration and litigation. In all such matters, the Company believes that its positions are legally and commercially reasonable. The Company considers the statuses of these proceedings ~~are considered~~ when ~~the Company determines~~determining its reserves for ~~losses~~unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses. While the final outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, the Company does not believe that any of these matters, when finally resolved, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or liquidity. However, an adverse resolution of one or more of these items in any one quarter or fiscal year could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations in that period.

~~There are no known significant pending legal issues not involving insurance or reinsurance business activity.~~

~~The Company continues~~Aside from litigation and arbitrations related to ~~receive claims under expired~~these insurance and reinsurance contracts asserting injuries and/or damages relating to or resulting from environmental pollution and hazardous substances, including asbestos. Environmental claims typically assert liability for (a) the mitigation or remediation of environmental contamination or (b) bodily injury or property damage caused by the release of hazardous substances into the land, air or water. Asbestos claims typically assert liability for bodily injury from exposure to asbestos or for property damage resulting from asbestos or products containing asbestos.

~~Table of Contents~~

The Company’s reserves include an estimate of the Company’s ultimate liability for asbestos and environmental (“A&E”) claims. As of June 30, 2011, approximately 6% of the Company’s gross reserves were an estimate of the Company’s ultimate liability for A&E claims. The Company’s A&E liabilities emanate from Mt. McKinley, a direct subsidiary ofagreements, the Company direct insurance business and Everest Re’s assumed reinsurance business. All of the contracts of insurance and reinsurance under which the Company has received claims during the past three years, expired more than 20 years ago. There are significant uncertainties surrounding the Company’s reserves for it’s A&E losses.is not a party to any other material litigation or arbitration.

A&E exposures represent a separate exposure group for monitoring and evaluating reserve adequacy. The following table summarizes incurred losses with respect to A&E reserves on both a gross and net of reinsurance basis for the periods indicated:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2011 2010 2011 2010
Gross basis:
Beginning of period reserves $ 535,764 $ 625,208 $ 554,790 $ 638,674
Incurred losses 753 - 753 -
Paid losses (9,795 ) (11,073 ) (28,821 ) (24,539 )
End of period reserves $ 526,722 $ 614,135 $ 526,722 $ 614,135

Net basis:
Beginning of period reserves $ 368,144 $ 419,230 $ 382,507 $ 430,421
Incurred losses (30 ) - (30 ) -
Paid losses (7,585 ) (6,579 ) (21,948 ) (17,770 )
End of period reserves $ 360,528 $ 412,651 $ 360,528 $ 412,651

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding)

At June 30, 2011, the gross reserves for A&E losses were comprised of $139,183 thousand representing case reserves reported by ceding companies, $108,765 thousand representing additional case reserves established by the Company on assumed reinsurance claims, $36,881 thousand representing case reserves established by the Company on direct excess insurance claims, including Mt. McKinley and $241,893 thousand representing IBNR reserves.

With respect to asbestos only, at June 30, 2011, the Company had gross asbestos loss reserves of $505,146 thousand, or 95.9%, of total A&E reserves, of which $403,150 thousand was for assumed business and $101,996 thousand was for direct business.

Management believes that these uncertainties and factors continue to render reserves for A&E and particularly asbestos losses significantly less subject to traditional actuarial analysis than reserves for other types of losses. The Company establishes reserves to the extent that, in the judgment of management, the facts and prevailing law reflect an exposure for the Company or its ceding companies.

Due to the uncertainties, the ultimate losses attributable to A&E, and particularly asbestos, may be subject to more variability than are non-A&E reserves and such variation, depending on coverage under the Company’s various reinsurance arrangements, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

~~Table of Contents~~

In 1993 and prior, the Company had a business arrangement with The Prudential Insurance Company of America (“The Prudential”) wherein, for a fee, the Company accepted settled claim payment obligations of certain property and casualty insurers, and, concurrently, became the owner of the annuity or assignee of the annuity proceeds funded by the property and casualty insurers specifically to fulfill these fully settled obligations. In these circumstances, the Company would be liable if The Prudential, which has an A+ (Superior) financial strength rating from A.M. Best Company (“A.M. Best”), was unable to make the annuity payments. The table below presents the estimated cost to replace all such annuities for which the Company was contingently liable for the periods indicated:

(Dollars in thousands) At June 30, 2011 At December 31, 2010
$ 143,013 $ 150,560

(Dollars in thousands)		At June 30, 2012				At December 31, 2011
		$	143,735			$	143,447

Table of Contents

Prior to its 1995 initial public offering, the Company purchased annuities from an unaffiliated life insurance company with an A+ (Superior) financial strength rating from A.M. Best to settle certain claim liabilities of the company. Should the life insurance company become unable to make the annuity payments, the Company would be liable for those claim liabilities. The table below presents the estimated cost to replace all such annuities for which the Company was contingently liable for the periods indicated:

(Dollars in thousands) At June 30, 2011 At December 31, 2010
$ 26,988 $ 26,542

(Dollars in thousands)		At June 30, 2012				At December 31, 2011
		$	28,002			$	27,634

7. OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The following table presents the components of comprehensive income (loss) in the consolidated statements of operations for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011			2012			2011
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) ("URA(D)") on
securities arising during the period
URA(D) of investments - temporary	$	53,203		$	46,846		$	37,700		$	50,512		$	(3,357	)	$	53,203		$	10,700		$	37,700
URA(D) of investments - non-credit OTTI		(15	)		(469	)		5			2,582			(49	)		(15	)		(69	)		5
Tax benefit (expense) from URA(D) arising during the period		(18,616	)		(16,232	)		(13,197	)		(18,583	)		1,192			(18,616	)		(3,721	)		(13,197	)
Total URA(D) on securities arising during the period, net of tax		34,572			30,145			24,508			34,511			(2,214	)		34,572			6,910			24,508

Foreign currency translation adjustments		(1,664	)		(8,896	)		14,236			1,830			(12,093	)		(1,664	)		(3,944	)		14,236
Tax benefit (expense) from foreign currency translation		582			3,114			(4,983	)		(640	)		4,232			582			1,380			(4,983	)
Net foreign currency translation adjustments		(1,082	)		(5,782	)		9,253			1,190			(7,861	)		(1,082	)		(2,564	)		9,253

Pension adjustments		1,147			671			2,295			1,299			1,514			1,147			3,027			2,295
Tax benefit (expense) on pension		(401	)		(235	)		(803	)		(455	)		(531	)		(401	)		(1,060	)		(803	)
Net pension adjustments		746			436			1,492			844			983			746			1,967			1,492

Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	$	34,236		$	24,799		$	35,253		$	36,545		$	(9,092	)	$	34,236		$	6,313		$	35,253

~~Table of Contents~~

The following table presents the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, in the consolidated balance sheets for the periods indicated:

	At June 30,			At December 31,			At June 30,			At December 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2012			2011
URA(D) on securities, net of deferred taxes
Temporary	$	129,980		$	105,474		$	153,682		$	146,727
Non-credit, OTTI		538			535			368			413
Total unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments, net of deferred taxes		130,518			106,009			154,050			147,140
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of deferred taxes		93,292			84,040			80,621			83,185
Pension adjustments, net of deferred taxes		(24,591	)		(26,083	)		(53,568	)		(55,535	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	199,219		$	163,966		$	181,103		$	174,790

8. CREDIT FACILITY

Effective August ~~23, 2006, Holdings~~15, 2011, the Company entered into a ~~five~~new three year, $150,000 thousand ~~senior~~unsecured revolving credit facility with a syndicate of lenders, replacing the August 23, 2006 five year senior revolving credit facility. Both the August 15, 2011 and August 23, 2006 revolving credit agreements, which have similar terms, are referred to as the “Holdings Credit Facility”. Citibank N.A. is the administrative agent for the Holdings Credit Facility. The Holdings Credit Facility may be used for liquidity and general corporate purposes. The Holdings Credit Facility provides for the borrowing of up to $150,000 thousand with interest at a rate selected by Holdings equal to either, (1) the Base Rate (as defined below) or (2) a periodic fixed rate equal to the Eurodollar Rate plus an applicable margin. The Base Rate means a fluctuating interest rate per annum in effect from time to time to be equal to the higher of (a) the rate of interest publicly announced by

Table of Contents

Citibank as its ~~prime~~base rate, or (b) 0.5% per annum above the Federal Funds Rate or (c) 1% above the one month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”), in each case plus the applicable margin. The amount of margin and the fees payable for the Holdings Credit Facility depends upon Holdings’ senior unsecured debt rating.

The Holdings Credit Facility requires Holdings to maintain a debt to capital ratio of not greater than 0.35 to 1 and Everest Re to maintain its statutory surplus at ~~$1,500,000~~$1,875,000 thousand plus 25% of future aggregate net income and 25% of future aggregate capital contributions after December 31, ~~2005,~~2010, which at June 30, ~~2011,~~2012, was ~~$2,005,890~~$1,965,407 thousand. As of June 30, ~~2011, Holdings~~2012, the Company was in compliance with all Holdings Credit Facility covenants.

The following table summarizes outstanding letters of credit and/or borrowings for the periods indicated:

(Dollars in thousands)	At June 30, 2011						At December 31, 2010						At June 30, 2012						At December 31, 2011
Bank	Commitment		In Use		Date of Loan	Maturity/Expiry Date	Commitment		In Use		Date of Loan	Maturity/Expiry Date	Commitment		In Use		Date of Loan	Maturity/Expiry Date	Commitment		In Use		Date of Loan	Maturity/Expiry Date
Citibank Holdings Credit Facility	$	150,000	$	15,000	6/16/2011	7/18/2011	$	150,000	$	50,000	12/16/2010	1/18/2011	$	150,000	$	-			$	150,000	$	-
				10,000	6/28/2011	7/28/2011				-
				15,000	6/06/2011	7/06/2011				-
Total revolving credit borrowings				40,000						50,000						-						-
Total letters of credit				9,527		12/31/2011				9,527		12/31/2011				5,020		12/31/2012				5,020		12/31/2012

Total Citibank Holdings Credit Facility	$	150,000	$	49,527			$	150,000	$	59,527			$	150,000	$	5,020			$	150,000	$	5,020

~~Prior to August 23, 2011, the Company plans to enter into a new Holdings Credit Facility with terms similar to the expiring Facility.~~

The following table presents the costs incurred in connection with the Holdings Credit Facility for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010		2012		2011		2012		2011
Credit facility fees incurred	$	89	$	141	$	179	$	150	$	138	$	89	$	305	$	179

~~Table of Contents~~

9. TRUST AGREEMENTS

A subsidiary of the Company, Everest Re, has established a trust agreement, which effectively uses Everest Re’s investments as collateral, as security for assumed losses payable to a non-affiliated ceding company. At June 30, ~~2011,~~2012, the total amount on deposit in the trust account was ~~$14,268~~$143,351 thousand.

10. SENIOR NOTES

The table below displays Holdings’ outstanding senior notes. Market value is based on quoted market ~~prices.~~prices, but due to limited trading activity, these senior notes are considered Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

					June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010								June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
					Consolidated Balance				Consolidated Balance								Consolidated Balance				Consolidated Balance
(Dollars in thousands)	Date Issued	Date Due	Principal Amounts		Sheet Amount		Market Value		Sheet Amount		Market Value		Date Issued	Date Due	Principal Amounts		Sheet Amount		Market Value		Sheet Amount		Market Value
5.40% Senior notes	10/12/2004	10/15/2014	$	250,000	$	249,835	$	270,570	$	249,812	$	267,500	10/12/2004	10/15/2014	$	250,000	$	249,882	$	261,950	$	249,858	$	251,370
8.75% Senior notes (matured and paid on March 15, 2010)	03/14/2000	03/15/2010	$	200,000	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Interest expense incurred in connection with these senior notes is as follows for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010		2012		2011		2012		2011
Interest expense incurred	$	3,387	$	3,385	$	6,773	$	10,447	$	3,387	$	3,387	$	6,774	$	6,773

Table of Contents

11. LONG TERM SUBORDINATED NOTES

The table below displays Holdings’ outstanding fixed to floating rate long term subordinated notes. Market value is based on quoted market ~~prices.~~prices, but due to limited trading activity, these subordinated notes are considered Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy.

Maturity Date

June 30, 2011

December 31, 2010

Maturity Date

June 30, 2012

December 31, 2011

Original

Consolidated Balance

Original

Consolidated Balance

(Dollars in thousands)

Date Issued

Principal Amount

Scheduled

Final

Sheet Amount

Market Value

Sheet Amount

Market Value

Date Issued

Principal Amount

Scheduled

Final

Sheet Amount

Market Value

Sheet Amount

Market Value

6.6% Long term subordinated notes

04/26/2007

400,000

05/15/2037

05/01/2067

238,352

236,031

238,351

227,825

04/26/2007

400,000

05/15/2037

05/01/2067

238,355

236,174

238,354

210,195

During the fixed rate interest period from May 3, 2007 through May 14, 2017, interest will be at the annual rate of 6.6%, payable semi-annually in arrears on November 15 and May 15 of each year, commencing on November 15, 2007, subject to Holdings’ right to defer interest on one or more occasions for up to ten consecutive years. During the floating rate interest period from May 15, 2017 through maturity, interest will be based on the 3 month LIBOR plus 238.5 basis points, reset quarterly, payable quarterly in arrears on February 15, May 15, August 15 and November 15 of each year, subject to Holdings’ right to defer interest on one or more occasions for up to ten consecutive years. Deferred interest will accumulate interest at the applicable rate compounded semi-annually for periods prior to May 15, 2017, and compounded quarterly for periods from and including May 15, 2017.

Holdings can redeem the long term subordinated notes prior to May 15, 2017, in whole but not in part at the applicable redemption price, which will equal the greater of (a) 100% of the principal amount being redeemed and (b) the present value of the principal payment on May 15, 2017 and scheduled payments of interest that would have accrued from the redemption date to May 15, 2017 on the long term subordinated notes being redeemed, discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis at a discount rate equal to the treasury rate plus an applicable spread of either 0.25% or 0.50%, in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest. Holdings may redeem the long term subordinated notes on or after May 15, 2017, in whole or in part at 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest; however, redemption on or after the scheduled maturity date and prior to May 1, 2047 is subject to a replacement capital covenant. This covenant is for the benefit of certain senior note holders and it mandates that Holdings receive proceeds from the sale of another subordinated debt issue, of at least similar size, before it may redeem the subordinated notes.

~~Table of Contents~~

On March 19, 2009, Group announced the commencement of a cash tender offer for any and all of the 6.60% fixed to floating rate long term subordinated notes. Upon expiration of the tender offer, the Company had reduced its outstanding debt by $161,441 ~~thousand, which resulted in a pre-tax gain on debt repurchase of $78,271~~ thousand.

Interest expense incurred in connection with these long term subordinated notes is as follows for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010		2012		2011		2012		2011
Interest expense incurred	$	3,937	$	3,937	$	7,874	$	7,874	$	3,937	$	3,937	$	7,874	$	7,874

Table of Contents

12. JUNIOR SUBORDINATED DEBT SECURITIES PAYABLE

The following table displays Holdings’ outstanding junior subordinated debt securities due to Everest Re Capital Trust II (“Capital Trust II”), a ~~wholly-owned~~wholly owned finance subsidiary of Holdings. Fair value is primarily based on the quoted market price of the related trust preferred ~~securities.~~securities, and as such, these securities are considered Level 2 under the fair value hierarchy.

					June 30, 2011				December 31, 2010								June 30, 2012				December 31, 2011
					Consolidated Balance				Consolidated Balance								Consolidated Balance				Consolidated Balance
(Dollars in thousands)	Date Issued	Date Due	Amount Issued		Sheet Amount		Fair Value		Sheet Amount		Fair Value		Date Issued	Date Due	Amount Issued		Sheet Amount		Fair Value		Sheet Amount		Fair Value
6.20% Junior subordinated debt securities	03/29/2004	03/29/2034	$	329,897	$	329,897	$	321,577	$	329,897	$	294,825	03/29/2004	03/29/2034	$	329,897	$	329,897	$	335,145	$	329,897	$	326,313

Holdings may redeem the junior subordinated debt securities before their maturity at 100% of their principal amount plus accrued interest as of the date of redemption. The securities may be redeemed, in whole or in part, on one or more occasions at any time on or after March 30, 2009; or at any time, in whole, but not in part, within 90 days of the occurrence and continuation of a determination that the Trust may become subject to tax or the Investment Company Act.

Interest expense incurred in connection with these junior subordinated debt securities is as follows for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010		2012		2011		2012		2011
Interest expense incurred	$	5,114	$	5,114	$	10,227	$	10,227	$	5,114	$	5,114	$	10,227	$	10,227

Holdings considers that the mechanisms and obligations relating to the trust preferred securities, taken together, constitute a full and unconditional guarantee by Holdings of Capital Trust II’s payment obligations with respect to their trust preferred securities.

Capital Trust II will redeem all of the outstanding trust preferred securities when the junior subordinated debt securities are paid at maturity on March 29, 2034. The Company may elect to redeem the junior subordinated debt securities, in whole or in part, at any time on or after March 30, 2009. If such an early redemption occurs, the outstanding trust preferred securities would also be proportionately redeemed.

There are certain regulatory and contractual restrictions on the ability of Holdings’ operating subsidiaries to transfer funds to Holdings in the form of cash dividends, loans or advances. The insurance laws of the State of Delaware, where Holdings’ direct insurance subsidiaries are domiciled, require regulatory approval before those subsidiaries can pay dividends or make loans or advances to Holdings that exceed certain statutory thresholds. In addition, the terms of Holdings Credit Facility (discussed in Note 8) require Everest Re, Holdings’ principal insurance subsidiary, to maintain a certain statutory surplus level as measured at the end of each fiscal year. At December 31, ~~2010, $2,293,643~~2011, $2,108,692 thousand of the ~~$2,929,526~~$2,763,171 thousand in net assets of Holdings’ consolidated subsidiaries were subject to the foregoing regulatory restrictions.

2120

Table of Contents

13. SEGMENT REPORTING

During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, the Company realigned its reporting segments to reflect recent changes in the type and volume of business written. The Company ~~through its subsidiaries, operates~~previously reported the results of Marine & Aviation, Surety, Accident and Health (“A&H”) Reinsurance and A&H Primary operations as a separate segment—Specialty Underwriting. The A&H primary business, which is a relatively new line of business for the Company, has increased significantly, representing approximately 2% of premiums earned and is projected to continue to grow. The A&H primary business is better aligned with the Insurance reporting segment based on the similarities of this business with those businesses already reflected in ~~four segments:~~the Insurance segment. The other operating units included in the Specialty Underwriting segment would have encompassed less than 5% of the Company’s premiums earned and their volume is projected to remain approximately 6%. As a result of the size of these remaining operating units and their similarity to the business reported within U.S. Reinsurance, ~~Insurance, Specialty Underwriting and International.~~ they have been reclassified to the U.S. Reinsurance segment. There has been no change to the International reporting segment. The Company has restated all segment information for prior years to conform to the new reporting segment structure.

The U.S. Reinsurance operation writes property and casualty reinsurance and specialty lines of business, including Marine, Aviation, Surety and A&H business, on both a treaty and facultative basis, through reinsurance brokers, as well as directly with ceding companies primarily within the U.S. The Insurance operation writes property and casualty insurance directly and through general agents, brokers and surplus lines brokers within the U.S and Canada. The Specialty Underwriting operation writes accident and health (“A&H”), marine, aviation and surety business within the U.S. and worldwide through brokers and directly with ceding companies. The International operation writes non-U.S. property and casualty reinsurance through Everest Re’s branches in Canada, ~~and~~ Singapore and through offices in Brazil, Miami and New Jersey. The Insurance operation writes property and casualty insurance, including medical stop loss insurance, directly and through general agents, brokers and surplus lines brokers within the U.S. and Canada.

These segments are managed independently, but conform with corporate guidelines with respect to pricing, risk management, control of aggregate catastrophe exposures, capital, investments and support operations. Management generally monitors and evaluates the financial performance of these operating segments based upon their underwriting results.

Underwriting results include earned premium less losses and ~~loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”)~~LAE incurred, commission and brokerage expenses and other underwriting expenses. Underwriting results are measured using ratios, in particular loss, commission and brokerage and other underwriting expense ratios, which, respectively, divide incurred losses, commissions and brokerage and other underwriting expenses by premiums earned.

The Company does not maintain separate balance sheet data for its operating segments. Accordingly, the Company does not review and evaluate the financial results of its operating segments based upon balance sheet data.

~~The following tables present the underwriting results for the operating segments for the periods indicated:~~

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
U.S. Reinsurance	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2012			2011			2012		2011
Gross written premiums	$	135,469		$	280,231		$	504,950	$	586,322
Net written premiums		68,162			153,495			255,387		318,564

Premiums earned	$	164,146		$	168,889		$	348,013	$	344,574
Incurred losses and LAE		103,495			131,862			213,244		274,441
Commission and brokerage		54,651			39,072			99,828		82,825
Other underwriting expenses		10,021			9,872			20,775		19,778
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	(4,021	)	$	(11,917	)	$	14,166	$	(32,470	)

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
U.S. Reinsurance June 30, June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2011 2010 2011 2010
Gross written premiums $ 230,260 $ 268,215 $ 484,167 $ 512,223
Net written premiums 123,797 150,462 260,348 278,924

Premiums earned $ 141,633 $ 162,492 $ 286,788 $ 289,493
Incurred losses and LAE 112,650 84,346 236,077 174,454
Commission and brokerage 32,541 35,854 69,646 63,072
Other underwriting expenses 7,871 9,377 15,773 17,183
Underwriting gain (loss) $ (11,429 ) $ 32,915 $ (34,708 ) $ 34,784

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
Insurance June 30, June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2011 2010 2011 2010
Gross written premiums �� $ 226,132 $ 204,941 $ 480,607 $ 433,178
Net written premiums 109,204 80,812 234,230 183,279

Premiums earned $ 114,937 $ 86,187 $ 220,265 $ 187,353
Incurred losses and LAE 84,404 71,800 169,922 144,750
Commission and brokerage 7,377 6,098 13,698 7,739
Other underwriting expenses 22,401 16,279 44,273 32,856
Underwriting gain (loss) $ 755 $ (7,990 ) $ (7,628 ) $ 2,008

2221

Table of Contents

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
Specialty Underwriting June 30, June 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2011 2010 2011 2010
Gross written premiums $ 66,367 $ 65,855 $ 135,537 $ 131,742
Net written premiums 35,500 37,823 75,882 75,062

Premiums earned $ 33,057 $ 39,342 $ 75,451 $ 78,240
Incurred losses and LAE 24,891 34,512 50,148 61,973
Commission and brokerage 7,439 8,972 15,404 17,507
Other underwriting expenses 2,001 2,407 4,005 4,358
Underwriting gain (loss) $ (1,274 ) $ (6,549 ) $ 5,894 $ (5,598 )

	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
International	June 30,					June 30,						June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010			2011			2010			2012		2011		2012		2011
Gross written premiums	$	288,749	$	306,998		$	597,596		$	582,348		$	349,717	$	288,749	$	630,178	$	597,596
Net written premiums		141,501		166,046			299,625			311,255			160,199		141,501		296,528		299,625

Premiums earned	$	162,423	$	154,703		$	328,939		$	301,772		$	157,015	$	162,423	$	304,808	$	328,939
Incurred losses and LAE		90,864		124,091			409,690			360,576			97,888		90,864		162,528		409,690
Commission and brokerage		32,948		37,273			70,069			67,720			36,978		32,948		68,740		70,069
Other underwriting expenses		6,950		7,308			13,389			13,688			6,546		6,950		13,286		13,389
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	31,661	$	(13,969	)	$	(164,209	)	$	(140,212	)	$	15,603	$	31,661	$	60,254	$	(164,209	)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
Insurance	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2012			2011			2012			2011
Gross written premiums	$	247,693		$	242,528		$	454,942		$	513,989
Net written premiums		111,071			115,006			214,896			251,896

Premiums earned	$	117,309		$	120,738		$	219,360		$	237,930
Incurred losses and LAE		92,194			90,083			168,202			181,706
Commission and brokerage		1,736			8,285			12,288			15,923
Other underwriting expenses		24,532			22,401			46,552			44,273
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	(1,153	)	$	(31	)	$	(7,682	)	$	(3,972	)

The following table reconciles the underwriting results for the operating segments to income (loss) before taxes as reported in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011			2012			2011
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	19,713		$	4,407		$	(200,651	)	$	(109,018	)	$	10,429		$	19,713		$	66,738		$	(200,651	)
Net investment income		84,459			89,346			171,591			174,453			74,206			84,459			155,448			171,591
Net realized capital gains (losses)		(68,184	)		(95,473	)		(27,708	)		(100,780	)		82,589			(68,184	)		258,730			(27,708	)
Corporate expense		(1,165	)		(1,463	)		(2,355	)		(3,689	)		(1,732	)		(1,165	)		(3,298	)		(2,355	)
Interest, fee and bond issue cost amortization expense		(12,695	)		(12,722	)		(25,377	)		(29,062	)		(12,683	)		(12,695	)		(25,379	)		(25,377	)
Other income (expense)		(11,568	)		8,709			(11,536	)		13,821			25,428			(11,568	)		19,174			(11,536	)
Income (loss) before taxes	$	10,560		$	(7,196	)	$	(96,036	)	$	(54,275	)	$	178,237		$	10,560		$	471,413		$	(96,036	)

The Company produces business in the U.S. and internationally. The net income deriving from ~~and~~ assets residing in the individual foreign countries in which the Company writes business are not identifiable in the Company’s financial records. Based on gross written premium, the table below presents the largest country, other than the U.S., in which the Company writes business, for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010		2012		2011		2012		2011
Canada	$	39,232	$	49,976	$	83,184	$	85,279	$	27,835	$	39,232	$	75,275	$	83,184

No other country represented more than 5% of the Company’s ~~revenue.~~revenues.

2322

Table of Contents

14. RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Parent

Group’s Board of Directors approved an amended share repurchase program authorizing Group and/or its subsidiary Holdings to purchase Group’s common shares through open market transactions, privately negotiated transactions or both. The table below represents the amendments to the share repurchase program for the common shares approved for repurchase.

		~~Common Shares~~
		~~Authorized for~~
~~Amendment Date~~		~~Repurchase~~
~~09/21/2004~~		~~5,000,000~~
~~07/21/2008~~		~~5,000,000~~
~~02/24/2010~~		~~5,000,000~~
		~~15,000,000~~

��	Common Shares
	Authorized for
Amendment Date	Repurchase
(Dollars in thousands)
09/21/2004	$	5,000,000
07/21/2008		5,000,000
02/24/2010		5,000,000
02/22/2012		5,000,000
	$	20,000,000

As of June 30, ~~2011,~~2012, Holdings held 9,719,971 common shares of Group, which it had purchased in the open market between February 1, 2007 and March 8, 2011. The table below represents the total purchase price for these common shares purchased.

(Dollars in thousands)
Total purchase price		$	835,371

Holdings reports these purchases as other invested assets, fair value, in the consolidated balance sheets with changes in fair value re-measurement recorded in net realized capital gains (losses) in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss). The following table presents the dividends received on these common shares that are reported as net investment income in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the period indicated.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010		2012		2011		2012		2011
Dividends received	$	4,666	$	4,127	$	9,314	$	5,553	$	4,665	$	4,666	$	9,331	$	9,314

Outside Directors

During the normal course of business, the Company, through its affiliates, engages in insurance and brokerage and commission business transactions, with companies controlled by or affiliated with one or more of its outside directors. Such transactions, individually and in the aggregate, are not material to the Company’s financial condition, results of operation and cash flows.

Affiliated Companies

During the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company sold its subsidiaries, Everest Insurance Company of Canada (“Everest Canada”) and Premiere Insurance Underwriting Services (“Premiere”), to an affiliated company, Holdings Ireland. Holdings Ireland is a direct subsidiary of Group, the Company’s ultimate parent. The Company sold the subsidiaries to Holdings Ireland for $61,005 thousand, which was the book value of the subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011.

Everest Global Services, Inc. (“~~Everest Global”~~Global Services”), an affiliate of Holdings, provides centralized management and home office services, through a management agreement, to Holdings and other affiliated companies within Holdings’ consolidated structure. Services provided by Everest Global include executive managerial services, legal services, actuarial services, accounting services, information technology services and others.

2423

Table of Contents

The following table presents the expenses incurred by Holdings from services provided by Everest Global for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010		2012		2011		2012		2011
Expenses incurred	$	15,370	$	16,566	$	30,447	$	31,467	$	18,239	$	15,370	$	36,373	$	30,447

~~Affiliates~~

The Company engages in reinsurance transactions with Bermuda Re and Everest International Reinsurance, Ltd. (“Everest International”), affiliates, primarily driven by enterprise risk and capital management considerations under which business is ceded at market rates and terms.Affiliates

The table below represents affiliated quota share reinsurance agreements ("whole account quota share") for all new and renewal business for the indicated coverage period:

(Dollars in thousands)
Percent Assuming Single Aggregate
Coverage Period Ceding Company Ceded Company Type of Business Occurrence Limit Limit

01/01/2002-12/31/2002 Everest Re 20.0 % Bermuda Re property / casualty business $ - $ -

01/01/2003-12/31/2003 Everest Re 25.0 % Bermuda Re property / casualty business - -

01/01/2004-12/31/2005 Everest Re 22.5 % Bermuda Re property / casualty business - -
Everest Re 2.5 % Everest International property / casualty business - -

01/01/2006-12/31/2006 Everest Re 18.0 % Bermuda Re property business 125,000 (1) -

Everest Re
2.0 % Everest International property business - -

01/01/2006-12/31/2007 Everest Re 31.5 % Bermuda Re casualty business - -
Everest Re 3.5 % Everest International casualty business - -

01/01/2007-12/31/2007 Everest Re 22.5 % Bermuda Re property business 130,000 (1) -
Everest Re 2.5 % Everest International property business - -

01/01/2008-12/31/2008 Everest Re 36.0 % Bermuda Re property / casualty business 130,000 (1) 275,000 (2)
Everest Re 4.0 % Everest International property / casualty business - -

01/01/2009-12/31/2009 Everest Re 36.0 % Bermuda Re property / casualty business 150,000 (1) 325,000 (2)
Everest Re 8.0 % Everest International property / casualty business - -

01/01/2010-12/31/2010
Everest Re 44.0 % Bermuda Re property / casualty business 150,000 325,000

01/01/2011 Everest Re 50.0 % Bermuda Re property / casualty business 150,000 300,000

01/01/2003-12/31/2006 Everest Re- Canadian Branch 50.0 % Bermuda Re property business - -
01/01/2007-12/31/2009 Everest Re- Canadian Branch 60.0 % Bermuda Re property business - -
01/01/2010-12/31/2010
Everest Re- Canadian Branch 60.0 % Bermuda Re property business 350,000 -
01/01/2011 Everest Re- Canadian Branch 60.0 % Bermuda Re property business 350,000 -

(1) The single occurance limit is applied before the loss cessions to either Bermuda Re or Everest International.

(2) The aggregate limit is applied before the loss cessions to either Bermuda Re or Everest International.

(Dollars in thousands)
		Percent			Assuming		Single			Aggregate
Coverage Period	Ceding Company	Ceded			Company	Type of Business	Occurrence Limit			Limit

01/01/2002-12/31/2002	Everest Re		20.0	%	Bermuda Re	property / casualty business	$	-		$	-

01/01/2003-12/31/2003	Everest Re		25.0	%	Bermuda Re	property / casualty business		-			-

01/01/2004-12/31/2005	Everest Re		22.5	%	Bermuda Re	property / casualty business		-			-
	Everest Re		2.5	%	Everest International	property / casualty business		-			-

01/01/2006-12/31/2006	Everest Re		18.0	%	Bermuda Re	property business		125,000	(1)		-
	Everest Re		2.0	%	Everest International	property business		-			-

01/01/2006-12/31/2007	Everest Re		31.5	%	Bermuda Re	casualty business		-			-
	Everest Re		3.5	%	Everest International	casualty business		-			-

01/01/2007-12/31/2007	Everest Re		22.5	%	Bermuda Re	property business		130,000	(1)		-
	Everest Re		2.5	%	Everest International	property business		-			-

01/01/2008-12/31/2008	Everest Re		36.0	%	Bermuda Re	property / casualty business		130,000	(1)		275,000	(2)
	Everest Re		4.0	%	Everest International	property / casualty business		-			-

01/01/2009-12/31/2009	Everest Re		36.0	%	Bermuda Re	property / casualty business		150,000	(1)		325,000	(2)
	Everest Re		8.0	%	Everest International	property / casualty business		-			-

01/01/2010-12/31/2010	Everest Re		44.0	%	Bermuda Re	property / casualty business		150,000			325,000

01/01/2011-12/31/2011	Everest Re		50.0	%	Bermuda Re	property / casualty business		150,000			300,000

01/01/2012	Everest Re		50.0	%	Bermuda Re	property / casualty business		100,000			200,000

01/01/2003-12/31/2006	Everest Re- Canadian Branch		50.0	%	Bermuda Re	property business		-			-
01/01/2007-12/31/2009	Everest Re- Canadian Branch		60.0	%	Bermuda Re	property business		-			-
01/01/2010-12/31/2010	Everest Re- Canadian Branch		60.0	%	Bermuda Re	property business		350,000	(3)		-
01/01/2011-12/31/2011	Everest Re- Canadian Branch		60.0	%	Bermuda Re	property business		350,000	(3)		-
01/01/2012	Everest Re- Canadian Branch		75.0	%	Bermuda Re	property / casualty business		206,250	(3)		412,500	(3)

01/01/2012	Everest Canada		80.0	%	Everest Re- Canadian Branch	property business		-			-

(1) The single occurance limit is applied before the loss cessions to either Bermuda Re or Everest International.
(2) The aggregate limit is applied before the loss cessions to either Bermuda Re or Everest International.
(3) Amounts shown are Canadian dollars.

2524

Table of Contents

For premiums earned and losses incurred for the period January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002, Everest Re, Everest National Insurance Company and Everest Security Insurance Company entered into an Excess of Loss Reinsurance Agreement with Bermuda Re, covering workers’ compensation losses occurring on and after January 1, 2002, as respect to new, renewal and in force policies effective on that date through December 31, 2002. The table below represents Bermuda Re's liability limits for any losses per one occurrence.

	Liability Limits
(Dollars in thousands)	Exceeding		Not to Exceed
Losses per one occurrence	$	100,000	$	150,000

The table below represents loss portfolio transfer reinsurance agreements whereby net insurance exposures and reserves were transferred to an affiliate.

(Dollars in thousands)

Effective	Transferring	Assuming	% of Business or			Covered Period
Date	Company	Company	Amount of Transfer			of Transfer

09/19/2000	Mt. McKinley	Bermuda Re		100	%	All years
10/01/2001	Everest Re (Belgium Branch)	Bermuda Re		100	%	All years
10/01/2008	Everest Re	Bermuda Re	$	747,022		01/01/2002-12/31/2007

The following tables summarize the premiums and losses ceded by the Company to Bermuda Re and Everest International, respectively, and premiums and losses assumed by the Company from Everest Canada for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
Bermuda Re	June 30,				June 30,				June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011		2010		2011		2010		2012		2011		2012		2011
Ceded written premiums	$	368,614	$	325,719	$	749,422	$	645,750	$	341,220	$	368,614	$	740,288	$	749,422
Ceded earned premiums		380,353		326,072		760,400		614,230		427,461		380,353		825,493		760,400
Ceded losses and LAE (a)		294,364		194,630		785,077		483,076		211,805		294,364		468,180		785,077

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
Everest International	June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)		2011		2010		2011		2010
Ceded written premiums	$	175	$	20,629	$	639	$	48,941
Ceded earned premiums		4,436		34,172		14,041		74,504
Ceded losses and LAE		3,995		39,770		6,913		63,786

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
Everest International	June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2012		2011		2012			2011
Ceded written premiums	$	439	$	175	$	694		$	639
Ceded earned premiums		875		4,436		1,967			14,041
Ceded losses and LAE		523		3,995		(1,576	)		6,913

	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
Everest Canada	June 30,				June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2012		2011		2012		2011
Assumed written premiums	$	5,476	$	-	$	8,643	$	-
Assumed earned premiums		3,514		-		7,366		-
Assumed losses and LAE		2,109		-		4,420		-

(a) Ceded losses and LAE include the Mt. McKinley loss portfolio transfer that constitutes losses ceded under retroactive reinsurance and therefore, in accordance with FASB guidance, a deferred gain on retroactive reinsurance is reflected in other expenses on the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).

Everest Re sold net assets of its UK branch to Bermuda Re and provided Bermuda Re with a reserve indemnity agreement allowing for indemnity payments of up to 90% of ₤25.0 million of the excess of 2002 and prior reserves, provided that any recognition of profit from the reserves for 2002 and prior underwriting years is taken into account. The limit available under this agreement was fully exhausted at December 31, 2004.

2625

Table of Contents

15. INCOME TAXES

The Company is domiciled in the United States and has subsidiaries domiciled within the United States with significant branches in Canada and Singapore. The Company’s non-U.S. branches are subject to income taxation at varying rates in their respective domiciles.

The Company generally will use the estimated annual effective tax rate approach for calculating its tax provision for interim periods as prescribed by ASC 740-270, Interim Reporting. Under the estimated annual effective tax rate approach, the estimated annual effective tax rate is applied to the interim year-to-date pre-tax income to determine the income tax expense or benefit for the year-to-date period. The tax expense or benefit for a quarter represents the difference between the year-to-date tax expense or benefit for the current year-to-date period less such amount for the immediately preceding year-to-date period. Management considers the ~~estimated~~ impact of all known events in its estimation of the Company’s annual pre-tax income and effective tax rate.

During the second quarter of 2012, the Company identified an understatement in its Deferred tax asset account of $9,257 thousand. The understatement resulted from differences between filed and recorded amounts that had accumulated over several prior periods. The Company corrected this understatement in its June 30, 2012 financial statements, resulting in an additional $9,257 thousand income tax benefit included in the income tax expense (benefit) caption in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) and increased net income for the same amount for the quarter ended June 30, 2012. The Company also increased its Deferred tax asset in its Consolidated Balance Sheets by the same amount. The Company recorded a similar adjustment of $12,417 thousand during the first quarter of 2012, for a total six-month adjustment of $21,674 thousand. The Company believes that the out of period adjustments are immaterial to its June 30, 2012 financial statements and to all prior periods. As such, the Company has not restated any prior period amounts.

16. ACQUISITIONS

During the first ~~six months~~quarter of 2011, the Company made several acquisitions to expand its domestic and Canadian insurance operations. Below are descriptions of the transactions.

On January 2, 2011, the Company acquired the entire business and operations of Heartland Crop Insurance, Inc. (“Heartland”) of Topeka, Kansas for $55,000 thousand in cash, plus contingent payments in future periods based upon achievement of performance targets. Heartland is a managing general agent specializing in crop insurance.

On January 28, 2011, the Company acquired the entire business and operations of Premiere ~~Underwriting Services (“Premiere”)~~ of Toronto, Canada. Premiere is a managing general agent specializing in entertainment and sports and leisure risks. On January 31, 2011, the Company acquired the renewal rights and operations of the financial lines business of Executive Risk Insurance Services, Ltd. (“Executive Risk”) of Toronto, Canada. The financial lines business of Executive Risk mainly underwrites Directors and Officers Liability, Fidelity, and Errors and Omissions Liability.

Overall, the Company recorded $35,068 thousand of goodwill and $26,903 thousand of intangible assets related to these ~~acquisitions.~~acquisitions, which are reported as part of other assets within the consolidated balance sheets. All intangible assets recorded as part of these acquisitions will be amortized on a straight line basis over seven years.

17. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated known recognized and non-recognized subsequent events. The Company does not have any subsequent events to report.

2726

Table of Contents

~~ITEM 2.~~

ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Industry Conditions.

The worldwide reinsurance and insurance businesses are highly competitive, as well as cyclical by product and market. As such, financial results tend to fluctuate with periods of constrained availability, high rates and strong profits followed by periods of abundant capacity, low rates and constrained profitability. Competition in the types of reinsurance and insurance business that we underwrite is based on many factors, including the perceived overall financial strength of the reinsurer or insurer, ratings of the reinsurer or insurer by A.M. Best and/or Standard & Poor’s, underwriting expertise, the jurisdictions where the reinsurer or insurer is licensed or otherwise authorized, capacity and coverages offered, premiums charged, other terms and conditions of the reinsurance and insurance business offered, services offered, speed of claims payment and reputation and experience in lines written. Furthermore, the market impact from these competitive factors related to reinsurance and insurance is generally not consistent across lines of business, domestic and international geographical areas and distribution channels.

We compete in the U.S. and international reinsurance and insurance markets with numerous global competitors. Our competitors include independent reinsurance and insurance companies, subsidiaries or affiliates of established worldwide insurance companies, reinsurance departments of certain insurance companies and domestic and international underwriting operations, including underwriting syndicates at Lloyd’s. Some of these competitors have greater financial resources than we do and have established long term and continuing business relationships, which can be a significant competitive advantage. In addition, the lack of strong barriers to entry into the reinsurance business and the potential for securitization of reinsurance and insurance risks through capital markets provide additional sources of potential reinsurance and insurance capacity and competition.

Worldwide insurance and reinsurance market conditions continued to be very competitive, particularly in the casualty lines of business. Generally, there was ample insurance and reinsurance capacity relative to demand. Competition and its effect on rates, terms and conditions vary widely by market and coverage yet continued to be most prevalent in the U.S. casualty insurance and reinsurance markets.

However, during ~~the first half of~~ 2011, the industry experienced significant losses from Australian floods, the New Zealand earthquake, the earthquake and tsunami in Japan, ~~and spring~~ storms in the ~~U.S.~~U.S, and the Thailand floods. It is too early to determine the impact on market conditions as a result of these events. While there have been meaningful rate increases for catastrophe coverages in some global catastrophe prone regions, particularly areas impacted by these losses, whether the magnitude of these losses is sufficient to increase rates and improve market conditions for other lines of business remains to be seen.

Overall, we believe that current marketplace conditions, particularly for catastrophe coverages, provide profit opportunities for us given our strong ratings, distribution system, reputation and expertise. We continue to employ our strategy of targeting business that offers the greatest profit potential, while maintaining balance and diversification in our overall portfolio.

2827

Table of Contents

Financial Summary.

We monitor and evaluate our overall performance based upon financial results. The following table displays a summary of the consolidated net income (loss), ratios and stockholder’s equity for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Percentage			Six Months Ended						Percentage			Three Months Ended						Percentage			Six Months Ended						Percentage
	June 30,						Increase/			June 30,						Increase/			June 30,						Increase/			June 30,						Increase/
(Dollars in millions)	2011			2010			(Decrease)			2011			2010			(Decrease)			2012			2011			(Decrease)			2012			2011			(Decrease)
Gross written premiums	$	811.5		$	846.0			-4.1	%	$	1,697.9		$	1,659.5			2.3	%	$	732.9		$	811.5			-9.7	%	$	1,590.1		$	1,697.9			-6.4	%
Net written premiums		410.0			435.1			-5.8	%		870.1			848.5			2.5	%		339.4			410.0			-17.2	%		766.8			870.1			-11.9	%

REVENUES:
Premiums earned	$	452.1		$	442.7			2.1	%	$	911.4		$	856.9			6.4	%	$	438.5		$	452.1			-3.0	%	$	872.2		$	911.4			-4.3	%
Net investment income		84.5			89.3			-5.5	%		171.6			174.5			-1.6	%		74.2			84.5			-12.1	%		155.4			171.6			-9.4	%
Net realized capital gains (losses)		(68.2	)		(95.5	)		-28.6	%		(27.7	)		(100.8	)		-72.5	%		82.6			(68.2	)		-221.1	%		258.7			(27.7	)	NM
Other income (expense)		(11.6	)		8.7			-232.8	%		(11.5	)		13.8			-183.5	%		25.4			(11.6	)	NM				19.2			(11.5	)	NM
Total revenues		456.8			445.3			2.6	%		1,043.8			944.4			10.5	%		620.7			456.8			35.9	%		1,305.5			1,043.8			25.1	%

CLAIMS AND EXPENSES:
Incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses		312.8			314.7			-0.6	%		865.8			741.8			16.7	%		293.6			312.8			-6.1	%		544.0			865.8			-37.2	%
Commission, brokerage, taxes and fees		80.3			88.2			-8.9	%		168.8			156.0			8.2	%		93.4			80.3			16.3	%		180.9			168.8			7.1	%
Other underwriting expenses		39.2			35.4			10.9	%		77.4			68.1			13.7	%		41.1			39.2			4.8	%		80.6			77.4			4.1	%
Corporate expense		1.2			1.5			-20.3	%		2.4			3.7			-36.2	%		1.7			1.2			48.6	%		3.3			2.4			40.0	%
Interest, fee and bond issue cost amortization expense		12.7			12.7			-0.2	%		25.4			29.1			-12.7	%		12.7			12.7			-0.1	%		25.4			25.4			0.0	%
Total claims and expenses		446.2			452.5			-1.4	%		1,139.8			998.6			14.1	%		442.5			446.2			-0.8	%		834.1			1,139.8			-26.8	%

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE TAXES		10.6			(7.2	)		-246.8	%		(96.0	)		(54.3	)		76.9	%		178.2			10.6		NM				471.4			(96.0	)	NM
Income tax expense (benefit)		1.8			(24.1	)		-107.3	%		(7.3	)		(26.2	)		-72.1	%		52.6			1.8		NM				131.0			(7.3	)	NM
NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	8.8		$	16.9			-47.8	%	$	(88.7	)	$	(28.0	)		216.4	%	$	125.7		$	8.8		NM			$	340.4		$	(88.7	)	NM

RATIOS:							Point Change									Point Change									Point Change									Point Change
Loss ratio		69.2	%		71.1	%		(1.9	)		95.0	%		86.6	%		8.4			67.0	%		69.2	%		(2.2	)		62.4	%		95.0	%		(32.6	)
Commission and brokerage ratio		17.8	%		19.9	%		(2.1	)		18.5	%		18.2	%		0.3			21.3	%		17.8	%		3.5			20.7	%		18.5	%		2.2
Other underwriting expense ratio		8.6	%		8.0	%		0.6			8.5	%		7.9	%		0.6			9.3	%		8.6	%		0.7			9.2	%		8.5	%		0.7
Combined ratio		95.6	%		99.0	%		(3.4	)		122.0	%		112.7	%		9.3			97.6	%		95.6	%		2.0			92.3	%		122.0	%		(29.7	)


										At			At			Percentage												At			At			Percentage
										June 30,			December 31,			Increase/												June 30,			December 31,			Increase/
(Dollars in millions)											2011			2010		(Decrease)												2012			2011			(Decrease)
Balance sheet data:
Total investments and cash										$	8,443.0		$	8,293.9			1.8	%										$	8,754.8		$	8,396.3			4.3	%
Total assets											14,472.4			13,869.4			4.3	%											14,281.7			14,349.2			-0.5	%
Loss and loss adjustment expense reserves											8,275.6			7,652.3			8.1	%											8,013.7			8,290.6			-3.3	%
Total debt											858.1			868.1			-1.2	%											818.1			818.1			0.0	%
Total liabilities											11,394.9			10,741.7			6.1	%											10,990.2			11,407.8			-3.7	%
Stockholder's equity											3,077.5			3,127.7			-1.6	%											3,291.5			2,941.4			11.9	%

(NM, not meaningful)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Revenues.

Premiums. Gross written premiums decreased by ~~$34.5~~$78.6 million, or ~~4.1%~~9.7%, for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2010,~~2011, reflecting aan $83.8 million decrease ~~of $55.7 million~~ in our reinsurance business, partially offset by a ~~$21.2~~$5.2 million increase in our insurance business. Gross written premiums ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$38.4~~$107.8 million, or ~~2.3%~~6.4%, for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, ~~2010,~~2011, reflecting a ~~$47.4~~$59.0 million ~~increase~~decrease in our insurance business ~~partially offset by~~and a $48.8 million decrease ~~of $9.0 million~~ in our reinsurance business. The ~~increase~~decreases in ~~insurance~~reinsurance premiums ~~was~~were primarily due to the ~~acquisition~~portfolio return of ~~Heartland, which provided $77.4 million~~premium on the non-renewal of a large Florida quota share reinsurance contract, partially offset by increases in new ~~crop insurance~~ business and rate increases on renewals, particularly for catastrophe

2928

Table of Contents

~~as well as improved premium rates on our California workers’ compensation business, partially offset by our reduced participation on a large casualty program.~~exposed contracts. The ~~decrease~~fluctuations in ~~reinsurance~~insurance premiums ~~was~~were primarily due to the ~~continued reduction~~combination of decreases due to the termination and runoff of several large casualty programs and increases from growth in U.S. casualty business as well as the planned reduction of catastrophe exposed business in certain territories, partially offset by higher reinstatement premiums resulting from catastrophe losses, year over year.crop and primary medical stop loss insurance.

Net written premiums decreased by ~~$25.1~~$70.6 million, or ~~5.8%~~17.2%, for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2010,~~2011 and ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$21.6~~$103.3 million, or ~~2.5%~~11.9%, for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, ~~2010.~~2011. The ~~fluctuations~~decrease in net written premiums ~~relative to~~is in line with the ~~change~~decrease in gross written premiums were due to a combination of a higher percentage of premiums ceded under the affiliated quota share agreement and a lower level of ceded reinsurance in the Insurance segment due to the planned reduction in one casualty program.premiums. Premiums earned ~~increased $9.3~~decreased $13.6 million, or ~~2.1%~~3.0%, for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2010~~2011 and ~~increased $54.6~~decreased $39.2 million, or ~~6.4%~~4.3%, for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, ~~2010.~~2011. The ~~change~~smaller declines in premiums earned ~~relative~~in comparison to net written premiums iswere primarily attributable to the ~~result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation~~non-renewal of the ~~coverage period.~~ large Florida quota share reinsurance contract and increases in new business and rate increases on renewals, particularly for catastrophe exposed contracts.

Net Investment Income. Net investment income decreased ~~$4.9~~$10.3 million, or ~~5.5%~~12.1%, to $74.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared with net investment income of $84.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, primarily as a result of a $4.7 million decrease in investment income from our limited partnership investments and the impact from lower reinvestment rates on fixed maturities over the past several years. Net investment income decreased $16.2 million, or 9.4%, to $155.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared with net investment income of ~~$89.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Net investment income decreased $2.9 million, or 1.6%, to~~ $171.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, ~~compared with net~~primarily as a result of a $11.5 million decrease in investment income ~~of $174.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.~~from our limited partnership investments and lower reinvestment rates. Net pre-tax investment income, as a percentage of average invested assets was 3.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 4.2% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 ~~compared to 4.5%~~and was 3.8% for the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2010 and was~~2012 compared to 4.3% for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011 compared to 4.4%~~2011. The declines in these yields were primarily the result of fluctuations in our limited partnership income and lower reinvestment rates for the ~~six months ended June 30, 2010. The investment yields are lower primarily due to lower reinvestment rates.~~fixed income portfolio.

Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses). Net realized capital gains were $82.6 million and net realized capital losses were $68.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and ~~$95.5~~2011, respectively. Of the $82.6 million, there were $83.2 million of gains from fair value re-measurements, partially offset by $0.5 million of other-than-temporary impairments on our available for sale fixed maturity securities and $0.1 million of net realized capital losses from sales on our fixed maturity and equity securities. The net realized capital losses of $68.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 ~~and 2010, respectively. Of~~were the ~~$68.2 million, there were~~result of $62.5 million of losses from fair value re-measurements and $5.6 million of net realized capital losses from sales on our fixed maturity and equity securities. ~~The~~

Net realized capital gains were $258.7 million and net realized capital losses ~~of $95.5~~were $27.7 million for the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2010~~2012 and 2011, respectively. Of the $258.7 million, there were ~~the result of $94.4~~$236.0 million of ~~losses~~gains from fair value re-measurements and ~~$1.1~~$28.9 million of net realized capital ~~losses~~gains from sales on our fixed maturity and equity securities, partially offset by $6.1 million of other-than-temporary impairments on our available for sale fixed maturity securities.

~~Net~~ The net realized capital losses ~~were~~of $27.7 ~~million and $100.8~~ million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 ~~and 2010, respectively. Of~~were the ~~$27.7 million, there were~~result of $17.5 million of net realized capital losses from sales on our fixed maturity and equity securities and $13.6 million of other-than-temporary impairments on our available for sale fixed maturity securities, which were partially offset by $3.5 million of gains from fair value re-measurements. The net realized capital losses of $100.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were the result of $100.9 million of losses from fair value re-measurements, partially offset by $0.1 million of net realized capital gains from sales on our fixed maturity and equity securities.

Other Income (Expense). We recorded other income of $25.4 million and $19.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. We recorded other expense of $11.6 million and $11.5 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively. ~~We recorded other income of $8.7 million and $13.8 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.~~ The changes were primarily ~~the result of~~due to fluctuations in ~~foreign~~ currency exchange rates for the corresponding ~~periods.~~periods and fluctuations in the amortization of deferred gains on retroactive reinsurance agreements with affiliates.

3029

Table of Contents

Claims and Expenses.

Incurred Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses. The following tables present our incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses (“LAE”) for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended June 30,																					Three Months Ended June 30,
	Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/				Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)	Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change				Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2012
Attritional (a)																						$	266.1			60.8	%		$	14.1			3.2	%		$	280.2			64.0	%
Catastrophes																							15.0			3.4	%			(1.7	)		-0.4	%			13.3			3.0	%
A&E																							-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total																						$	281.1			64.2	%		$	12.5			2.8	%		$	293.6			67.0	%

2011
Attritional (a)	$	251.7			55.8	%		$	(7.5	)		-1.7	%		$	244.2			54.1	%		$	251.7			55.8	%		$	(7.5	)		-1.7	%		$	244.2			54.1	%
Catastrophes		60.8			13.4	%			7.9			1.7	%			68.7			15.2	%			60.8			13.4	%			7.9			1.7	%			68.7			15.2	%
A&E		-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total	$	312.5			69.2	%		$	0.4			0.0	%		$	312.8			69.2	%		$	312.5			69.2	%		$	0.4			0.0	%		$	312.8			69.2	%

2010
Variance 2012/2011
Attritional (a)	$	265.5			60.0	%		$	9.7			2.2	%		$	275.2			62.2	%		$	14.4			5.0		pts	$	21.6			4.9		pts	$	36.0			9.9		pts
Catastrophes		45.9			10.4	%			(6.4	)		-1.4	%			39.5			8.9	%			(45.8	)		(10.0	)	pts		(9.6	)		(2.1	)	pts		(55.4	)		(12.2	)	pts
A&E		-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			-		pts		-			-		pts		-			-		pts
Total	$	311.4			70.3	%		$	3.3			0.8	%		$	314.7			71.1	%		$	(31.4	)		(5.0	)	pts	$	12.1			2.8		pts	$	(19.2	)		(2.2	)	pts

Variance 2011/2010
Attritional (a)	$	(13.8	)		(4.2	)	pts	$	(17.2	)		(3.9	)	pts	$	(31.0	)		(8.1	)	pts
Catastrophes		14.9			3.0		pts		14.3			3.1		pts		29.2			6.3		pts
A&E		-			-		pts		-			-		pts		-			-		pts
Total	$	1.1			(1.1	)	pts	$	(2.9	)		(0.8	)	pts	$	(1.9	)		(1.9	)	pts

		Six Months Ended June 30,																						Six Months Ended June 30,
		Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/					Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)		Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change					Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2012
Attritional (a)																								$	501.5			57.6	%		$	15.9			1.8	%		$	517.4			59.4	%
Catastrophes																									30.0			3.4	%			(3.5	)		-0.4	%			26.5			3.0	%
A&E																									-			0.0	%			0.1			0.0	%			0.1			0.0	%
Total																								$	531.5			61.0	%		$	12.5			1.4	%		$	544.0			62.4	%

2011
Attritional (a)		$	508.1			55.7	%		$	(18.0	)		-2.0	%		$	490.2			53.8	%			$	508.1			55.7	%		$	(18.0	)		-2.0	%		$	490.2			53.8	%
Catastrophes			365.1			40.1	%			10.6			1.2	%			375.7			41.2	%				365.1			40.1	%			10.6			1.2	%			375.7			41.2	%
A&E			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%				-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total		$	873.2			95.8	%		$	(7.3	)		-0.8	%		$	865.8			95.0	%			$	873.2			95.8	%		$	(7.3	)		-0.8	%		$	865.8			95.0	%

2010
Attritional (a)		$	533.8			62.3	%		$	0.4			0.1	%		$	534.2			62.3	%
Catastrophes			211.1			24.6	%			(3.5	)		-0.4	%			207.5			24.2	%
A&E			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total		$	744.9			86.9	%		$	(3.1	)		-0.4	%		$	741.8			86.6	%

Variance 2011/2010
Variance 2012/2011
Attritional (a)		$	(25.7	)		(6.6	)	pts	$	(18.4	)		(2.1	)	pts	$	(44.0	)		(8.5	)	pts		$	(6.6	)		1.9		pts	$	33.9			3.8		pts	$	27.2			5.6		pts
Catastrophes			154.0			15.5		pts		14.1			1.6		pts		168.2			17.0		pts			(335.1	)		(36.7	)	pts		(14.1	)		(1.6	)	pts		(349.2	)		(38.2	)	pts
A&E			-			-		pts		-			-		pts		-			-		pts			-			-		pts		0.1			-		pts		0.1			-		pts
Total		$	128.3			8.9		pts	$	(4.2	)		(0.4	)	pts	$	124.0			8.4		pts		$	(341.7	)		(34.8	)	pts	$	19.8			2.2		pts	$	(321.8	)		(32.6	)	pts

(a) Attritional losses exclude catastrophe and Asbestos and Environmental ("A&E") losses.	(a) Attritional losses exclude catastrophe and Asbestos and Environmental ("A&E") losses.																						(a) Attritional losses exclude catastrophe and Asbestos and Environmental ("A&E") losses.
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)	(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)																						(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses and LAE decreased by ~~$1.9~~$19.2 million, ~~or 0.6%,~~representing 2.2 loss ratio points for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to the three months ended June 30, ~~2010. Of the $1.9 million decrease, attritional~~2011. Current year catastrophe losses ~~decreased $31.0~~were lower by $45.8 million, or ~~8.1~~10.0 points, period over period. The $15.0 million of current year catastrophe losses for 2012 related to U.S. storm losses. The $60.8 million of current year catastrophe losses for 2011 related primarily ~~due~~ to ~~lower attritional loss ratios across most segments due, in part, to changes in~~U.S. storm losses ($24.7 million), the ~~mix of business, but also due to the impact of the change in cessions under the affiliated quota share agreement.~~2011 New Zealand earthquake ($20.3 million) and Japanese earthquake and tsunami ($9.5 million). Partially offsetting the decrease in ~~attritional~~current year catastrophe losses was an increase in ~~catastrophe~~attritional losses of ~~$29.2~~$36.0 million, or 9.9 loss ratio points, primarily due to the impact from year over year cessions under our affiliated quota share agreements resulting from movement in foreign exchange rates and changes in ceding percentages.

Incurred losses and LAE decreased by $321.8 million, representing 32.6 loss ratio points for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2011. Current year catastrophe losses were lower by $335.1 million, or 36.7 points, period over period. The $30.0 million of current year catastrophe losses ~~from the~~for 2012 related to U.S. ~~Midwest tornadoes and the first quarter earthquakes in New Zealand and Japan as well as unfavorable prior~~storm losses. The $365.1 million of current year ~~development mainly due to the Chile earthquake.~~catastrophe

3130

Table of Contents

~~Incurred~~ losses ~~and LAE increased by $124.0 million, or 16.7%,~~ for ~~the six months ended June 30,~~ 2011 ~~compared~~related primarily to the ~~six months ended June 30, 2010. Current year catastrophe~~Japanese earthquake and tsunami ($192.2 million), the 2011 New Zealand earthquake ($110.0 million), the 2011 Australian floods ($27.5 million) and U.S. Storms ($24.7 million). Attritional losses increased ~~$154.0~~$27.2 million, (15.5 points), period over period, primarily due to losses from the Japan and New Zealand earthquakes, Australia floods and the U.S. Midwest tornadoes. Partially offsetting the catastrophe increase, the current year attritional losses decreased by $25.7 million compared to the prior year, primarily due to lower attritionalrepresenting 5.6 loss ~~ratios across most segments due, in part, to changes in the mix of business, but also~~ratio points, due to the impact of ~~the change~~foreign exchange and changes in ~~cessions under the~~our affiliated quota share ~~agreement.~~agreements, partially offset by rate increases in catastrophe exposed areas and a shift in mix of business towards property catastrophe and excess of loss business, which generally carry lower attritional losses.

Commission, Brokerage, Taxes and Fees. Commission, brokerage, taxes and fees ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$7.9~~$13.1 million, or ~~8.9%~~16.3%, for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to the same period in ~~2010. Commission, brokerage, taxes~~2011, and ~~fees increased~~ by ~~$12.8~~$12.0 million, or ~~8.2%~~7.1%, for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to the same period in ~~2010. The variances were~~2011, due primarily to the ~~result~~one-time effect of ~~fluctuations~~the cancelled Florida quota share contract and the adoption of new accounting standards concerning the accounting for acquisition costs, which is increasing expenses in ~~premiums earned, changes~~2012, partially offset by an increase in ~~mix~~excess of loss business which carries a lower commission than pro rata business and ~~a change in the affiliated quota share agreement.~~better terms.

Other Underwriting Expenses. Other underwriting expenses ~~were~~increased to $41.1 million from $39.2 ~~million and $35.4~~ million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010,~~2011, respectively, and ~~$77.4~~increased to $80.6 million ~~and $68.1~~from $77.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010, respectively. The increases were~~respectively, due primarily ~~attributable~~ to ~~expenses of Heartland, which was acquired in January 2011.~~higher employee benefit plan expenses.

Corporate Expenses. Corporate expenses, which are general operating expenses that are not allocated to segments, were ~~$1.2~~$1.7 million and ~~$1.5~~$1.2 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010,~~2011, respectively, and ~~$2.4~~$3.3 million and ~~$3.7~~$2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010,~~2011, respectively.

Interest, Fees and Bond Issue Cost Amortization Expense. Interest, fees and other bond amortization expense was $12.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010~~respectively, and $25.4 ~~million and $29.1~~ million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, ~~and 2010,~~ respectively. ~~The decrease for the six month period was primarily due to the maturing of debt in March, 2010.~~

Income Tax Expense (Benefit). We had anincome tax expense of $52.6 million and $131.0 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. We had income tax expense of $1.8 million and an income tax benefit of $7.3 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, ~~respectively. We had an income tax benefit of $24.1 million and $26.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010,~~ respectively. Our income tax is primarily a function of the statutory tax rates coupled with the impact from tax-preferenced investment income. Variations in our effective tax rate generally result from changes in the relative levels of pre-tax income. The increases in tax expense were mainly due to the improvement in taxable income resulting from lower catastrophe losses in 2012, and also reflect tax benefits of $9.3 million and $21.7 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively, due to corrections of understatements in the deferred tax asset account.

Net Income (Loss).

Our net income was ~~$8.8~~$125.7 million and ~~$16.9~~$8.8 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010,~~2011, respectively. Our net income was $340.4 million and our net loss was $88.7 ~~million and $28.0~~ million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010,~~2011, respectively. The ~~decreases~~increases were primarily driven by ~~higher~~the decline in catastrophe losses in ~~2011 in addition~~2012 compared to the ~~other components discussed above.~~prior period.

Ratios.

Our combined ratio ~~decreased~~increased by ~~3.4~~2.0 points to 97.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 95.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 ~~compared~~and decreased by 29.7 points to ~~99.0%~~92.3% for the ~~same period in 2010, and increased by 9.3 points~~six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to 122.0% for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011 compared to 112.7% for the same period in 2010.~~2011. The loss ratio component decreased ~~by 1.9~~2.2 points and ~~increased by 8.4~~32.6 points for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2011,~~2012, respectively, over the same periods last ~~year. The commission and brokerage expense ratio decreased by 2.1 points~~year due to 17.8% for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 19.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2010, and increased slightly to 18.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to 18.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2010.lower catastrophe losses. The other underwriting expense ratio component and the commission and brokerage ratio component both increased ~~slightly for both~~over the ~~three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared~~same period last year due to the ~~same periods last year.~~increase in expenses explained above.

3231

Table of Contents

Stockholder's Equity.

Stockholder's equity ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$50.2~~$350.1 million to ~~$3,077.5~~$3,291.5 million at June 30, ~~2011~~2012 from ~~$3,127.7~~$2,941.4 million at December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, principally as a result of ~~$88.7~~$340.4 million of net ~~loss, partially offset by $24.5~~income, $6.9 million of unrealized appreciation on investments, net of tax, ~~$9.3~~$3.4 million of share-based compensation transactions and $2.0 million of net benefit plan obligation adjustments, partially offset by $2.6 million of foreign currency translation ~~adjustments and $3.2 million of share-based compensation transactions.~~adjustments.

Consolidated Investment Results

Net Investment Income.

Net investment income decreased ~~5.5%~~12.1% to $74.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $84.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, ~~compared~~and decreased 9.4% to ~~$89.3~~$155.4 million for the ~~three~~six months ended June 30, ~~2010, and decreased 1.6%~~2012 compared to $171.6 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011 compared to $174.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.~~2011. The decreases ~~period over period,~~ were primarily due to decreases in income from our limited partnership investments and a decline in income from our fixed maturities ~~reflective of reducing our municipal bond exposure and declining~~resulting from lower reinvestment rates. ~~The declines were partially offset by income from our expanded public equity portfolios and higher income from our limited partnership investments.~~

The following table shows the components of net investment income for the periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,						June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2012			2011			2012			2011
Fixed maturities	$	59.1		$	75.8		$	119.8		$	149.4		$	54.0		$	59.1		$	108.8		$	119.8
Equity securities		6.5			2.6			11.6			5.0			10.1			6.5			20.4			11.6
Short-term investments and cash		0.4			0.1			0.6			0.2			0.3			0.4			0.4			0.6
Other invested assets
Limited partnerships		13.9			8.9			32.4			18.3			9.2			13.9			20.8			32.4
Dividends from Parent's shares		4.7			4.1			9.3			5.6			4.6			4.7			9.3			9.3
Other		4.1			0.4			4.7			0.7			(0.5	)		4.1			1.0			4.7
Total gross investment income		88.7			91.9			178.4			179.2			77.7			88.7			160.8			178.4
Interest debited (credited) and other expense		(4.3	)		(2.6	)		(6.8	)		(4.7	)		(3.6	)		(4.3	)		(5.4	)		(6.8	)
Total net investment income	$	84.5		$	89.3		$	171.6		$	174.5		$	74.2		$	84.5		$	155.4		$	171.6

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

The following tables show a comparison of various investment yields for the periods indicated:

	At	At	At	At
	June 30,	December 31,	June 30,	December 31,
	2011	2010	2012	2011
Imbedded pre-tax yield of cash and invested assets	3.6%	3.6%	3.4%	3.6%
Imbedded after-tax yield of cash and invested assets	2.8%	2.8%	2.5%	2.7%

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
2011 2010 2011 2010
Annualized pre-tax yield on average cash and invested assets 4.2% 4.5% 4.3% 4.4%
Annualized after-tax yield on average cash and invested assets 3.2% 3.6% 3.3% 3.6%

	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	2012	2011	2012	2011
Annualized pre-tax yield on average cash and invested assets	3.6%	4.2%	3.8%	4.3%
Annualized after-tax yield on average cash and invested assets	2.7%	3.2%	2.8%	3.3%

3332

Table of Contents

Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses).

The following table presents the composition of our net realized capital gains (losses) for the periods indicated:

		Three Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,									Three Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)		2011			2010			Variance			2011			2010			Variance			2012			2011			Variance			2012			2011			Variance
Gains (losses) from sales:
Fixed maturity securities, market value
Gains		$	2.7		$	5.4		$	(2.7	)	$	16.8		$	7.0		$	9.8		$	3.6		$	2.7		$	0.9		$	7.2		$	16.8		$	(9.6	)
Losses			(8.7	)		(3.7	)		(5.0	)		(35.1	)		(6.2	)		(28.9	)		(1.2	)		(8.7	)		7.5			(3.3	)		(35.1	)		31.8
Total			(6.0	)		1.6			(7.6	)		(18.3	)		0.8			(19.1	)		2.4			(6.0	)		8.4			3.9			(18.3	)		22.2

Fixed maturity securities, fair value
Gains			0.6			0.2			0.4			0.8			0.3			0.5			0.1			0.6			(0.5	)		5.5			0.8			4.7
Losses			-			-			-			(1.7	)		-			(1.7	)		(0.2	)		-			(0.2	)		(0.4	)		(1.7	)		1.3
Total			0.6			0.2			0.4			(0.9	)		0.3			(1.2	)		(0.2	)		0.6			(0.8	)		5.0			(0.9	)		5.9

Equity securities, market value
Gains			-			-			-			0.2			-			0.2			-			-			-			-			0.2			(0.2	)
Losses			-			-			-			(0.2	)		-			(0.2	)		-			-			-			-			(0.2	)		0.2
Total			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-			-

Equity securities, fair value
Gains			0.7			1.2			(0.5	)		2.9			3.6			(0.7	)		1.0			0.7			0.3			27.8			2.9			24.9
Losses			(0.9	)		(4.1	)		3.2			(1.2	)		(4.6	)		3.4			(3.4	)		(0.9	)		(2.5	)		(7.9	)		(1.2	)		(6.7	)
Total			(0.2	)		(2.9	)		2.7			1.7			(1.0	)		2.7			(2.4	)		(0.2	)		(2.2	)		19.9			1.7			18.2

Total net realized gains (losses) from sales
Gains			4.0			6.8			(2.8	)		20.7			10.9			9.8			4.7			4.0			0.7			40.5			20.7			19.8
Losses			(9.6	)		(7.8	)		(1.8	)		(38.2	)		(10.8	)		(27.4	)		(4.8	)		(9.6	)		4.8			(11.6	)		(38.2	)		26.6
Total			(5.6	)		(1.1	)		(4.5	)		(17.5	)		0.1			(17.6	)		(0.1	)		(5.6	)		5.5			28.9			(17.5	)		46.4

Other-than-temporary impairments:			-			-			-			(13.6	)		-			(13.6	)		(0.5	)		-			(0.5	)		(6.1	)		(13.6	)		7.5

Gains (losses) from fair value adjustments:
Fixed maturities, fair value			-			(2.5	)		2.5			(3.5	)		0.5			(4.0	)		(1.7	)		-			(1.7	)		1.3			(3.5	)		4.8
Equity securities, fair value			-			(30.0	)		30.0			38.1			(16.8	)		54.9			(21.7	)		-			(21.7	)		46.1			38.1			8.0
Other invested assets, fair value			(62.5	)		(61.9	)		(0.6	)		(31.1	)		(84.6	)		53.5			106.7			(62.5	)		169.2			188.6			(31.1	)		219.7
Total			(62.5	)		(94.4	)		31.9			3.5			(100.9	)		104.4			83.2			(62.5	)		145.7			236.0			3.5			232.5

Total net realized capital gains (losses)		$	(68.2	)	$	(95.5	)	$	27.4		$	(27.7	)	$	(100.8	)	$	73.1		$	82.6		$	(68.2	)	$	150.8		$	258.7		$	(27.7	)	$	286.4

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)	(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Net realized capital gains were $82.6 million and net realized capital losses were $68.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, ~~compared to $95.5 million for~~respectively. For the three months ended June 30, ~~2010.~~2012, we recorded $83.2 million of gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity, equity securities and other invested assets, partially offset by $0.5 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities and $0.1 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded $62.5 million ofin losses due to fair value re-measurements on other invested assets and $5.6 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities. The ~~net realized~~ losses on the sales of fixed maturity securities in 2011 included the impact of selling part of our municipal bond portfolio as credit concerns arose in this market sector. For the three months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded $94.4 million in losses due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and other invested assets and $1.1 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities.

3433

Table of Contents

Net realized capital gains were $258.7 million and net realized capital losses were $27.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, ~~compared to net realized capital losses of $100.8 million for~~respectively. For the six months ended June 30, ~~2010.~~2012, we recorded $236.0 million of gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity, equity securities and other invested assets and $28.9 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities, partially offset by $6.1 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we recorded $17.5 million of net realized capital losses from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities and $13.6 million of other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities, partially offset by $3.5 million ofin gains due to fair value re-measurements on fixed ~~maturity~~maturities and equity securities and other invested assets. The ~~net realized~~ losses on the sales of fixed maturity securities in 2011 included the impact of selling part of our municipal bond portfolio as credit concerns arose in this market sector. For the six months ended June 30, 2010, we recorded $100.9 million in losses due to fair value re-measurements on fixed maturity and equity securities and other invested assets and $0.1 million of net realized capital gains from sales of fixed maturity and equity securities.

Segment Results.

~~Through~~During the quarter ended September 30, 2011, we realigned our ~~subsidiaries, we operate~~reporting segments to reflect recent changes in ~~four segments:~~the type and volume of business written. We previously reported the results of Marine & Aviation, Surety, A&H Reinsurance and A&H Primary operations as a separate segment—Specialty Underwriting. The A&H primary business, which is a relatively new line of business for us, has increased significantly, representing approximately 2% of premiums earned and is projected to continue to grow. The A&H primary business is better aligned with the Insurance reporting segment based on the similarities of this business with those businesses already reflected in the Insurance segment. The other operating units included in the Specialty Underwriting segment would have encompassed less than 5% of our premiums earned and their volume is projected to remain approximately 6%. As a result of the size of these remaining operating units and their similarity to the business reported within U.S. Reinsurance, ~~Insurance, Specialty Underwriting and International.~~ they have been reclassified to the U.S. Reinsurance segment. There has been no change to the International reporting segment. We have restated all segment information for prior years to conform to the new reporting segment structure.

The U.S. Reinsurance operation writes property and casualty reinsurance and specialty lines of business, including Marine, Aviation, Surety and A&H business, on both a treaty and facultative basis, through reinsurance brokers, as well as directly with ceding companies primarily within the U.S. The International operation writes non-U.S. property and casualty reinsurance through Everest Re’s branches in Canada, Singapore and through offices in Brazil, Miami and New Jersey. The Insurance operation writes property and casualty insurance, including medical stop loss insurance, directly and through general agents, brokers and surplus lines brokers within the U.S and Canada. The Specialty Underwriting operation writes A&H, marine, aviation and surety business within the U.S. and worldwide through brokers and directly with ceding companies. The International operation writes non-U.S. property and casualty reinsurance through Everest Re’s branches in Canada and Singapore and offices in Brazil, Miami and New Jersey.

Underwriting results include earned premium less losses and LAE incurred, commission and brokerage expenses and other underwriting expenses. We measure our underwriting results using ratios, in particular loss, commission and brokerage and other underwriting expense ratios, which respectively, divide incurred losses, commissions and brokerage and other underwriting expenses by premiums earned.

Our loss and LAE reserves are our best estimate of our ultimate liability for unpaid claims. We re-evaluate our estimates on an ongoing basis, including all prior period reserves, taking into consideration all available information and, in particular, recently reported loss claim experience and trends related to prior periods. Such re-evaluations are recorded in incurred losses in the period in which the re-evaluation is made.

3534

Table of Contents

The following discusses the underwriting results for each of our segments for the periods indicated:

U.S. Reinsurance.

The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the U.S. Reinsurance segment for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,												Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2011			2010			Variance			% Change			2011			2010			Variance			% Change			2012			2011			Variance			% Change			2012			2011			Variance			% Change
Gross written premiums	$	230.3		$	268.2		$	(38.0	)		-14.2	%	$	484.2		$	512.2		$	(28.1	)		-5.5	%	$	135.5		$	280.2		$	(144.8	)		-51.7	%	$	505.0		$	586.3		$	(81.4	)		-13.9	%
Net written premiums		123.8			150.5			(26.7	)		-17.7	%		260.3			278.9			(18.6	)		-6.7	%		68.2			153.5			(85.3	)		-55.6	%		255.4			318.6			(63.2	)		-19.8	%

Premiums earned	$	141.6		$	162.5		$	(20.9	)		-12.8	%	$	286.8		$	289.5		$	(2.7	)		-0.9	%	$	164.1		$	168.9		$	(4.7	)		-2.8	%	$	348.0		$	344.6		$	3.4			1.0	%
Incurred losses and LAE		112.7			84.3			28.3			33.6	%		236.1			174.5			61.6			35.3	%		103.5			131.9			(28.4	)		-21.5	%		213.2			274.4			(61.2	)		-22.3	%
Commission and brokerage		32.5			35.9			(3.3	)		-9.2	%		69.6			63.1			6.6			10.4	%		54.7			39.1			15.6			39.9	%		99.8			82.8			17.0			20.5	%
Other underwriting expenses		7.9			9.4			(1.5	)		-16.1	%		15.8			17.2			(1.4	)		-8.2	%		10.0			9.9			0.1			1.5	%		20.8			19.8			1.0			5.0	%
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	(11.4	)	$	32.9		$	(44.3	)		-134.7	%	$	(34.7	)	$	34.8		$	(69.5	)		-199.8	%	$	(4.0	)	$	(11.9	)	$	7.9			-66.3	%	$	14.2		$	(32.5	)	$	46.6			-143.6	%

										Point Chg												Point Chg												Point Chg												Point Chg
Loss ratio		79.5	%		51.9	%					27.6			82.3	%		60.3	%					22.0			63.0	%		78.1	%					(15.1	)		61.3	%		79.6	%					(18.3	)
Commission and brokerage ratio		23.0	%		22.1	%					0.9			24.3	%		21.8	%					2.5			33.3	%		23.1	%					10.2			28.7	%		24.0	%					4.7
Other underwriting expense ratio		5.6	%		5.7	%					(0.1	)		5.5	%		5.9	%					(0.4	)		6.1	%		5.9	%					0.2			5.9	%		5.8	%					0.1
Combined ratio		108.1	%		79.7	%					28.4			112.1	%		88.0	%					24.1			102.4	%		107.1	%					(4.7	)		95.9	%		109.4	%					(13.5	)

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Premiums. Gross written premiums decreased by ~~14.2%~~51.7% to ~~$230.3~~$135.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 from $280.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, ~~from $268.2~~primarily due to the non-renewal of a large Florida quota share reinsurance contract, partially offset by increased new business and higher premium rates on renewals, particularly for catastrophe exposed risks. Net written premiums decreased 55.6% to $68.2 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2010, primarily due~~2012 compared to reduced premium volume for treaty casualty and crop reinsurance business due to the non-renewal of several contracts, partially offset by a $2.5 million increase in reinstatement premiums due to current quarter catastrophe loss activity. Net written premiums decreased 17.7% to $123.8$153.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, ~~compared to $150.5 million for~~which is in line with the ~~three months ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to the~~percentage decrease in gross written premiums for the quarter. Premiums earned decreased ~~12.8%~~2.8% to ~~$141.6~~$164.1 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to ~~$162.5~~$168.9 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2010.~~2011. The ~~change in~~variance difference between premiums earned ~~is relatively consistent with the decrease in~~and net written ~~premiums.~~ premiums was primarily attributable to the non-renewal of the large Florida quota share reinsurance contract partially offset by increases in new business and rate increases on renewals, particularly for catastrophe exposed contracts.

Gross written premiums decreased by ~~5.5%~~13.9% to ~~$484.2~~$505.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 from $586.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, ~~from $512.2~~primarily due to the non-renewal of a large Florida quota share reinsurance contract, partially offset by increased new business and higher premium rates on renewals, particularly for contracts with catastrophe exposed risks. Net written premiums decreased 19.8% to $255.4 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2010, primarily due~~2012 compared to reduced premium volume for treaty casualty and crop reinsurance business due to the non-renewal of several contracts, partially offset by a $9.2 million increase in reinstatement premiums due to catastrophe loss activity. Net written premiums decreased 6.7% to $260.3$318.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, ~~compared~~which is in line with the decrease in gross written premiums. Premiums earned increased 1.0% to ~~$278.9~~$348.0 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2010, primarily due~~2012 compared to ~~the decrease in gross written premiums for the year. Premiums earned decreased 0.9% to $286.8~~$344.6 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011 compared to $289.5 million for~~2011. As with the ~~six months ended June 30, 2010. The change in~~quarter, the variance difference between premiums earned ~~relative to~~and net written premiums is primarily attributable to the ~~result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation~~non-renewal of the ~~coverage period.~~ large Florida quota share reinsurance contract partially offset by increases in new business and rate increases on renewals, particularly for catastrophe exposed contracts.

3635

Table of Contents

Incurred Losses and LAE. The following tables present the incurred losses and LAE for the U.S. Reinsurance segment for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended June 30,																					Three Months Ended June 30,
	Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/				Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)	Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change				Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2012
Attritional																						$	82.9			50.6	%		$	8.3			5.0	%		$	91.2			55.6	%
Catastrophes																							15.0			9.1	%			(2.7	)		-1.7	%			12.3			7.4	%
A&E																							-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total segment																						$	97.9			59.7	%		$	5.6			3.3	%		$	103.5			63.0	%

2011																													��
Attritional	$	74.9			52.8	%		$	1.8			1.3	%		$	76.7			54.1	%		$	93.3			55.2	%		$	1.9			1.1	%		$	95.2			56.3	%
Catastrophes		26.7			18.8	%			9.3			6.6	%			36.0			25.4	%			28.0			16.6	%			8.8			5.2	%			36.8			21.8	%
A&E		-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total segment	$	101.6			71.6	%		$	11.1			7.9	%		$	112.7			79.5	%		$	121.3			71.8	%		$	10.7			6.3	%		$	131.9			78.1	%

2010
Variance 2012/2011
Attritional	$	79.0			48.6	%		$	9.7			6.0	%		$	88.7			54.6	%		$	(10.4	)		(4.6	)	pts	$	6.4			3.9		pts	$	(4.0	)		(0.7	)	pts
Catastrophes		(2.8	)		-1.7	%			(1.6	)		-1.0	%			(4.4	)		-2.7	%			(13.0	)		(7.5	)	pts		(11.5	)		(6.9	)	pts		(24.5	)		(14.4	)	pts
A&E		-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			-		pts		-			-		pts		-			-		pts
Total segment	$	76.2			46.9	%		$	8.1			5.0	%		$	84.3			51.9	%		$	(23.4	)		(12.1	)	pts	$	(5.1	)		(3.0	)	pts	$	(28.4	)		(15.1	)	pts

Variance 2011/2010
Attritional	$	(4.1	)		4.2		pts	$	(7.9	)		(4.7	)	pts	$	(12.0	)		(0.5	)	pts
Catastrophes		29.5			20.5		pts		10.9			7.6		pts		40.4			28.1		pts
A&E		-			-		pts		-			-		pts		-			-		pts
Total segment	$	25.4			24.7		pts	$	3.0			2.9		pts	$	28.4			27.6		pts

		Six Months Ended June 30,																						Six Months Ended June 30,
		Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/					Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)		Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change					Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2012
Attritional																								$	177.6			51.1	%		$	12.6			3.6	%		$	190.2			54.7	%
Catastrophes																									30.0			8.6	%			(7.1	)		-2.0	%			22.9			6.6	%
A&E																									-			0.0	%			0.1			0.0	%			0.1			0.0	%
Total segment																								$	207.6			59.7	%		$	5.6			1.6	%		$	213.2			61.3	%

2011
Attritional		$	141.4			49.2	%		$	0.2			0.1	%		$	141.6			49.3	%			$	179.7			52.1	%		$	(0.5	)		-0.2	%		$	179.2			51.9	%
Catastrophes			84.5			29.5	%			10.1			3.5	%			94.5			33.0	%				85.7			24.9	%			9.5			2.8	%			95.2			27.7	%
A&E			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%				-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total segment		$	225.9			78.7	%		$	10.3			3.6	%		$	236.1			82.3	%			$	265.4			77.0	%		$	9.0			2.6	%		$	274.4			79.6	%

2010
Attritional		$	155.2			53.6	%		$	5.5			1.9	%		$	160.7			55.5	%
Catastrophes			12.9			4.4	%			0.9			0.3	%			13.8			4.8	%
A&E			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total segment		$	168.1			58.1	%		$	6.4			2.2	%		$	174.5			60.3	%

Variance 2011/2010
Variance 2012/2011
Attritional		$	(13.8	)		(4.4	)	pts	$	(5.3	)		(1.8	)	pts	$	(19.1	)		(6.2	)	pts		$	(2.1	)		(1.0	)	pts	$	13.1			3.8		pts	$	11.0			2.8		pts
Catastrophes			71.6			25.1		pts		9.2			3.2		pts		80.7			28.2		pts			(55.7	)		(16.3	)	pts		(16.6	)		(4.8	)	pts		(72.3	)		(21.1	)	pts
A&E			-			-		pts		-			-		pts		-			-		pts			-			-		pts		0.1			-		pts		0.1			-		pts
Total segment		$	57.8			20.7		pts	$	3.9			1.4		pts	$	61.6			22.0		pts		$	(57.8	)		(17.3	)	pts	$	(3.4	)		(1.0	)	pts	$	(61.2	)		(18.3	)	pts

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)	(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)																						(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses were $28.4 million ~~(27.6~~(15.1 points) ~~higher~~lower at ~~$112.7~~$103.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $131.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, ~~compared to $84.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010,~~ primarily as a result of the ~~$29.5~~$13.0 million ~~(20.5~~(7.5 points) ~~increase~~decrease in current year catastrophe losses ~~largely due to the U.S. Midwest tornadoes and Australian floods,~~ and the ~~$10.9~~$10.4 million ~~(7.6 points) increase to prior year catastrophe losses, primarily due to development on the Chile earthquake, partially offset by the $4.1 million (4.2~~(4.6 points) decrease in current year attritional losses. The $15.0 million of current year catastrophe losses ~~reflective~~for 2012 related to U.S. storm losses. The $28.0 million of current year catastrophe losses for 2011 related primarily to U.S. storms ($24.2 million) and Australian floods ($1.4 million). The decrease in current year attritional losses was primarily due to a shift in the mix of business towards catastrophe excess of loss business, which generally has lower ~~earned premium.~~attritional losses.

Incurred losses were ~~$61.6~~$61.2 million ~~(22.0~~(18.3 points) ~~higher~~lower at ~~$236.1~~$213.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $274.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, ~~compared to $174.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010,~~ primarily as a result of the ~~$71.6~~$55.7 million ~~(25.1~~(16.3 points) ~~increase~~decrease in current year catastrophe ~~losses, largely due to the Japan and New Zealand earthquakes, U.S. Midwest tornadoes and Australian floods, and the $9.2~~losses. The $30.0 million ~~(3.2 points) increase in prior~~of current year catastrophe losses ~~largely due~~for 2012 related to U.S. storm losses. The $85.7 million of current year catastrophe losses for 2011 related primarily to the ~~Chile earthquake. Partially offsetting these increases,~~Japanese earthquake and tsunami ($35.6 million), U.S. storms ($24.2 million), the ~~current year attritional losses decreased $13.8 million (4.4 points), due, in part, to higher reinstatement premiums in~~New Zealand earthquake ($22.7 million) and the ~~current year, which are booked without an additional loss provision.~~Australian floods ($2.4 million).

3736

Table of Contents

Segment Expenses. Commission and brokerage expenses ~~decreased 9.2%~~increased 39.9% to ~~$32.5~~$54.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $39.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Commission and brokerage expenses increased 20.5% to $99.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $82.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. These variances were primarily due to the one-time effect resulting from commissions of the cancelled Florida quota share contract.

Segment other underwriting expenses increased slightly to $10.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $9.9 million for the same period in 2011 and to $20.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $19.8 million for the same period in 2011.

International.

The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the International segment for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2012			2011			Variance			% Change			2012			2011			Variance			% Change
Gross written premiums	$	349.7		$	288.7		$	61.0			21.1	%	$	630.2		$	597.6		$	32.6			5.5	%
Net written premiums		160.2			141.5			18.7			13.2	%		296.5			299.6			(3.1	)		-1.0	%

Premiums earned	$	157.0		$	162.4		$	(5.4	)		-3.3	%	$	304.8		$	328.9		$	(24.1	)		-7.3	%
Incurred losses and LAE		97.9			90.9			7.0			7.7	%		162.5			409.7			(247.2	)		-60.3	%
Commission and brokerage		37.0			32.9			4.0			12.2	%		68.7			70.1			(1.3	)		-1.9	%
Other underwriting expenses		6.5			7.0			(0.4	)		-5.8	%		13.3			13.4			(0.1	)		-0.8	%
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	15.6		$	31.7		$	(16.1	)		-50.7	%	$	60.3		$	(164.2	)	$	224.5			-136.7	%

										Point Chg												Point Chg
Loss ratio		62.3	%		55.9	%					6.4			53.3	%		124.5	%					(71.2	)
Commission and brokerage ratio		23.6	%		20.3	%					3.3			22.6	%		21.3	%					1.3
Other underwriting expense ratio		4.2	%		4.3	%					(0.1	)		4.3	%		4.1	%					0.2
Combined ratio		90.1	%		80.5	%					9.6			80.2	%		149.9	%					(69.7	)

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Premiums. Gross written premiums increased by 21.1% to $349.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $288.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, ~~compared~~primarily due to ~~$35.9~~increased premium from the Latin American and Asian regions, with the latter experiencing significant rate increases following the 2011 catastrophe loss events, which was partially offset by a lower premium impact of the shift in this business away from pro rata to excess of loss. Net written premiums increased by 13.2% to $160.2 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2010. Commission and brokerage expenses~~2012 compared to $141.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to a increase in gross written premiums. Premiums earned decreased by 3.3% to $157.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $162.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums was the result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation of the coverage period.

Gross written premiums increased ~~10.4%~~by 5.5% to ~~$69.6~~$630.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $597.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, ~~compared~~primarily due to ~~$63.1~~increased premium from the Latin American and Asian regions, with the latter experiencing significant rate increases following the 2011 catastrophe loss events, which was partially offset by a lower premium impact of the shift in this business away from pro rata to excess of loss. Net written premiums decreased by 1.0% to $296.5 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2010. These variances were~~2012 compared to $299.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, primarily due to the impact of changes in our affiliated quota share agreements. Premiums earned decreased by 7.3% to $304.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $328.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums was the result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation of the coverage period.

Table of Contents

Incurred Losses and LAE. The following tables present the ~~mix of business with varying commission rates.~~incurred losses and LAE for the International segment for the periods indicated.

~~Segment other underwriting expenses decreased~~

	Three Months Ended June 30,
	Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)	Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2012
Attritional	$	93.8			59.7	%		$	3.1			1.9	%		$	96.8			61.6	%
Catastrophes		-			0.0	%			1.1			0.7	%			1.1			0.7	%
Total segment	$	93.8			59.7	%		$	4.2			2.6	%		$	97.9			62.3	%

2011
Attritional	$	67.3			41.4	%		$	(8.1	)		-5.0	%		$	59.2			36.4	%
Catastrophes		32.8			20.2	%			(1.1	)		-0.7	%			31.7			19.5	%
Total segment	$	100.1			61.6	%		$	(9.2	)		-5.7	%		$	90.9			55.9	%

Variance 2012/2011
Attritional	$	26.5			18.3		pts	$	11.2			6.9		pts	$	37.6			25.2		pts
Catastrophes		(32.8	)		(20.2	)	pts		2.2			1.4		pts		(30.6	)		(18.8	)	pts
Total segment	$	(6.3	)		(1.9	)	pts	$	13.4			8.3		pts	$	7.0			6.4		pts

	Six Months Ended June 30,
	Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)	Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2012
Attritional	$	158.9			52.1	%		$	-			0.0	%		$	158.9			52.1	%
Catastrophes		-			0.0	%			3.6			1.2	%			3.6			1.2	%
Total segment	$	158.9			52.1	%		$	3.6			1.2	%		$	162.5			53.3	%

2011
Attritional	$	141.5			42.9	%		$	(12.0	)		-3.6	%		$	129.5			39.3	%
Catastrophes		279.3			84.9	%			0.9			0.3	%			280.2			85.2	%
Total segment	$	420.8			127.8	%		$	(11.1	)		-3.3	%		$	409.7			124.5	%

Variance 2012/2011
Attritional	$	17.4			9.2		pts	$	12.0			3.6		pts	$	29.4			12.8		pts
Catastrophes		(279.3	)		(84.9	)	pts		2.7			0.9		pts		(276.6	)		(84.0	)	pts
Total segment	$	(261.9	)		(75.7	)	pts	$	14.7			4.5		pts	$	(247.2	)		(71.2	)	pts

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses and LAE increased 7.7% to ~~$7.9~~$97.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $90.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011, representing 6.4 loss ratio points. The increase was principally due to a $37.6 million (25.2 points) increase in attritional losses due to the impact from year over year cessions under our affiliated quota share agreements resulting from movement in foreign exchange rates and changes in ceding percentages, partially offset by a decrease in current year catastrophe losses of $32.8 million (20.2 points). There were no current year catastrophe losses in 2012 compared to ~~$9.4~~$32.8 million of 2011 current year catastrophes, which primarily related to the New Zealand earthquake ($20.1 million) and the Japanese earthquake and tsunami ($8.2 million).

Incurred losses and LAE decreased 60.3% to $162.5 million for the ~~same period in 2010. Segment other underwriting expenses decreased~~six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to ~~$15.8~~$409.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011, representing 71.2 loss ratio points. The decrease was principally due to a $279.3 million (84.9 points) decrease in current year catastrophe losses. There were no current year catastrophe losses in 2012 compared to ~~$17.2~~$279.3 million current year catastrophes in 2011, which primarily related to the Japanese earthquake and tsunami ($156.6 million), the New Zealand earthquake ($87.3 million) and the Australian flood ($25.1 million). Attritional losses increased by $29.4 million (12.8 points) primarily due to the impact of foreign exchange and changes in our affiliated quota share agreements.

Table of Contents

Segment Expenses. Commission and brokerage expenses increased 12.2% to $37.0 million for the ~~same period in 2010.~~three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $32.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. Commission and brokerage expenses decreased 1.9% to $68.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $70.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. These variances were principally due to ~~reduced operating costs~~the impact of changes in our affiliated quota share agreements and a shift in the mix of business.

Segment other underwriting expenses decreased slightly to $6.5 million for the ~~segment.~~three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $7.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and to $13.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $13.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Insurance.

The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the Insurance segment for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended June 30,											Six Months Ended June 30,												Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions)	2011			2010			Variance		% Change			2011			2010			Variance			% Change			2012			2011			Variance			% Change			2012			2011			Variance			% Change
Gross written premiums	$	226.1		$	204.9		$	21.2		10.3	%	$	480.6		$	433.2		$	47.4			10.9	%	$	247.7		$	242.5		$	5.2			2.1	%	$	454.9		$	514.0		$	(59.0	)		-11.5	%
Net written premiums		109.2			80.8			28.4		35.1	%		234.2			183.3			51.0			27.8	%		111.1			115.0			(3.9	)		-3.4	%		214.9			251.9			(37.0	)		-14.7	%

Premiums earned	$	114.9		$	86.2		$	28.8		33.4	%	$	220.3		$	187.4		$	32.9			17.6	%	$	117.3		$	120.7		$	(3.4	)		-2.8	%	$	219.4		$	237.9		$	(18.6	)		-7.8	%
Incurred losses and LAE		84.4			71.8			12.6		17.6	%		169.9			144.8			25.2			17.4	%		92.2			90.1			2.1			2.3	%		168.2			181.7			(13.5	)		-7.4	%
Commission and brokerage		7.4			6.1			1.3		21.0	%		13.7			7.7			6.0			77.0	%		1.7			8.3			(6.5	)		-79.0	%		12.3			15.9			(3.6	)		-22.8	%
Other underwriting expenses		22.4			16.3			6.1		37.6	%		44.3			32.9			11.4			34.7	%		24.5			22.4			2.1			9.5	%		46.6			44.3			2.3			5.1	%
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	0.8		$	(8.0	)	$	8.7		-109.4	%	$	(7.6	)	$	2.0		$	(9.6	)	NM			$	(1.2	)	$	-		$	(1.1	)	NM			$	(7.7	)	$	(4.0	)	$	(3.7	)		93.4	%

									Point Chg												Point Chg												Point Chg												Point Chg
Loss ratio		73.4	%		83.3	%				(9.9	)		77.1	%		77.3	%					(0.2	)		78.6	%		74.6	%					4.0			76.7	%		76.4	%					0.3
Commission and brokerage ratio		6.4	%		7.1	%				(0.7	)		6.2	%		4.1	%					2.1			1.5	%		6.9	%					(5.4	)		5.6	%		6.7	%					(1.1	)
Other underwriting expense ratio		19.5	%		18.9	%				0.6			20.2	%		17.5	%					2.7			20.9	%		18.5	%					2.4			21.2	%		18.6	%					2.6
Combined ratio		99.3	%		109.3	%				(10.0	)		103.5	%		98.9	%					4.6			101.0	%		100.0	%					1.0			103.5	%		101.7	%					1.8

(NM, not meaningful)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Premiums. Gross written premiums increased by ~~10.3%~~2.1% to ~~$226.1~~$247.7 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to ~~$204.9~~$242.5 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2010.~~2011. This increase was primarily due to ~~strategic portfolio changes with growth~~the increase in ~~short-tail business, primarily driven by the acquisition of Heartland, which provided $38.7 million of new~~ crop ~~insurance premium in the current quarter,~~premiums, partially offset by the ~~planned reduction~~run-off of ~~a large casualty program.~~terminated business. Net written premiums ~~increased 35.1%~~decreased 3.4% to ~~$109.2~~$111.1 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to ~~$80.8~~$115.0 million for the same period in ~~2010~~2011 due to ~~higher gross premiums and reduced levels~~an increase in the use of ~~ceded~~ reinsurance ~~primarily related to the reduced casualty program.~~on our crop business. Premiums earned ~~increased 33.4%~~decreased 2.8% to ~~$114.9~~$117.3 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to ~~$86.2~~$120.7 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2010.~~2011. The change in premiums earned is ~~relatively consistent with the increase in net written premium.~~

Gross written premiums increased by 10.9% to $480.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $433.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. This was due to strategic portfolio changes with growth in short-tail business, primarily driven by the acquisition of Heartland, which provided $77.4 million of new crop insurance premium in 2011, partially offset by the reduction of a large casualty program. Net written premiums increased 27.8% to $234.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $183.3 million for the same period in 2010 due to higher gross premiums and reduced levels of ceded reinsurance. Premiums earned increased 17.6% to $220.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $187.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The change in premiums earned is relatively consistent with the increase in net written premium.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Incurred Losses and LAE.~~ ~~The following tables present the incurred losses and LAE for the Insurance segment for the periods indicated.~~

Three Months Ended June 30,
Current Ratio %/ Prior Ratio %/ Total Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change
2011
Attritional $ 85.4 74.3 % $ (1.2 ) -1.1 % $ 84.2 73.2 %
Catastrophes - 0.0 % 0.2 0.2 % 0.2 0.2 %
Total segment $ 85.4 74.3 % $ (1.0 ) -0.9 % $ 84.4 73.4 %

2010
Attritional $ 70.6 81.9 % $ 1.2 1.4 % $ 71.8 83.3 %
Catastrophes - 0.0 % - 0.0 % - 0.0 %
Total segment $ 70.6 81.9 % $ 1.2 1.4 % $ 71.8 83.3 %

Variance 2011/2010
Attritional $ 14.8 (7.6 ) pts $ (2.4 ) (2.5 ) pts $ 12.4 (10.1 ) pts
Catastrophes - - pts 0.2 0.2 pts 0.2 0.2 pts
Total segment $ 14.8 (7.6 ) pts $ (2.2 ) (2.3 ) pts $ 12.6 (9.9 ) pts

Six Months Ended June 30,
Current Ratio %/ Prior Ratio %/ Total Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change
2011
Attritional $ 175.1 79.5 % $ (5.4 ) -2.5 % $ 169.7 77.0 %
Catastrophes - 0.0 % 0.2 0.1 % 0.2 0.1 %
Total segment $ 175.1 79.5 % $ (5.2 ) -2.4 % $ 169.9 77.1 %

2010
Attritional $ 144.8 77.3 % $ - 0.0 % $ 144.8 77.3 %
Catastrophes - 0.0 % - 0.0 % - 0.0 %
Total segment $ 144.8 77.3 % $ - 0.0 % $ 144.8 77.3 %

Variance 2011/2010
Attritional $ 30.3 2.2 pts $ (5.4 ) (2.5 ) pts $ 24.9 (0.3 ) pts
Catastrophes - - pts 0.2 0.1 pts 0.2 0.1 pts
Total segment $ 30.3 2.2 pts $ (5.2 ) (2.4 ) pts $ 25.1 (0.2 ) pts

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses and LAE increased by 17.6% to $84.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $71.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was primarily due to higher net premiums earned, partially offset by a decline of 7.6 points in the current year attritional loss ratio, year over year. The lower current year attritional loss ratio was due to a change in the mix of business with growth in short-tail/package business that has a lower loss ratio.

Incurred losses and LAE increased by 17.4% to $169.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $144.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was due to higher net premiums earned and an increase of 2.2 points in the current year attritional loss ratio, due to higher expected loss ratios on several casualty programs, reflective of current market conditions, partially offset by favorable prior year development.

~~Segment Expenses.~~ Commission and brokerage expenses increased to $7.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $6.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Commission and brokerage expenses increased to $13.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $7.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. These increases were primarily the result of an increase in net premiums earned and changes in the mix of business.

~~Table of Contents~~

Segment other underwriting expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $22.4 million from $16.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Segment other underwriting expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 increased to $44.3 million from $32.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. These increases were primarily duecomparable to the ~~expenses of the newly acquired Heartland.~~

~~Specialty Underwriting.~~

~~The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the Specialty Underwriting segment for the periods indicated.~~

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions) 2011 2010 Variance % Change 2011 2010 Variance % Change
Gross written premiums $ 66.4 $ 65.9 $ 0.5 0.8 % $ 135.5 $ 131.7 $ 3.8 2.9 %
Net written premiums 35.5 37.8 (2.3 ) -6.1 % 75.9 75.1 0.8 1.1 %

Premiums earned $ 33.1 $ 39.3 $ (6.3 ) -16.0 % $ 75.5 $ 78.2 $ (2.8 ) -3.6 %
Incurred losses and LAE 24.9 34.5 (9.6 ) -27.9 % 50.1 62.0 (11.8 ) -19.1 %
Commission and brokerage 7.4 9.0 (1.5 ) -17.1 % 15.4 17.5 (2.1 ) -12.0 %
Other underwriting expenses 2.0 2.4 (0.4 ) -16.9 % 4.0 4.4 (0.4 ) -8.1 %
Underwriting gain (loss) $ (1.3 ) $ (6.5 ) $ 5.3 -80.5 % $ 5.9 $ (5.6 ) $ 11.5 -205.3 %

Point Chg Point Chg
Loss ratio 75.3 % 87.7 % (12.4 ) 66.5 % 79.2 % (12.7 )
Commission and brokerage ratio 22.5 % 22.8 % (0.3 ) 20.4 % 22.4 % (2.0 )
Other underwriting expense ratio 6.0 % 6.1 % (0.1 ) 5.3 % 5.6 % (0.3 )
Combined ratio 103.8 % 116.6 % (12.8 ) 92.2 % 107.2 % (15.0 )

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

~~Premiums.~~ Gross written premiums increased by 0.8% to $66.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $65.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to an increase in A&H primary business for medical stop loss insurance offset by reductions in A&H reinsurance, Marine and Surety writings. Net written premiums decreased 6.1% to $35.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $37.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to a change in the affiliated quota share agreement. Premiums earned decreased 16.0% to $33.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $39.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, relatively consistent with the decrease in net written premiums.

Gross written premiums ~~increased~~decreased by ~~2.9%~~11.5% to ~~$135.5~~$454.9 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to ~~$131.7~~$514.0 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2010,~~2011. This decrease was primarily ~~due to~~driven by the termination and runoff of several large casualty programs, partially offset by an increase in crop and A&H primary ~~business for medical stop loss insurance offset by a reduction in A&H reinsurance and Marine~~ business. Net written premiums ~~increased 1.1%~~decreased 14.7% to ~~$75.9~~$214.9 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to ~~$75.1~~$251.9 million for the same period in 2011 due to the lower gross written premiums. Premiums earned decreased 7.8% to $219.4 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2010. The lower increase in net written premiums is primarily due~~2012 compared to ~~the change in the affiliated quota share agreement. Premiums earned decreased 3.6% to $75.5~~$237.9 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011 compared to $78.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.~~2011. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums is the result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation of the coverage period.

4039

Table of Contents

Incurred Losses and LAE. The following tables present the incurred losses and LAE for the ~~Specialty Underwriting~~Insurance segment for the periods indicated.

	Three Months Ended June 30,																					Three Months Ended June 30,
	Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/				Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)	Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change				Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2012
Attritional																						$	89.4			76.2	%		$	2.8			2.4	%		$	92.2			78.6	%
Catastrophes																							-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total segment																						$	89.4			76.2	%		$	2.8			2.4	%		$	92.2			78.6	%

2011
Attritional	$	24.1			72.8	%		$	-			0.0	%		$	24.1			72.9	%		$	91.1			75.4	%		$	(1.2	)		-1.0	%		$	89.9			74.4	%
Catastrophes		1.3			3.9	%			(0.5	)		-1.5	%			0.8			2.4	%			-			0.0	%			0.2			0.2	%			0.2			0.2	%
Total segment	$	25.4			76.7	%		$	(0.5	)		-1.4	%		$	24.9			75.3	%		$	91.1			75.4	%		$	(1.0	)		-0.8	%		$	90.1			74.6	%

2010
Variance 2012/2011
Attritional	$	32.2			81.9	%		$	0.7			1.9	%		$	33.0			83.8	%		$	(1.7	)		0.8		pts	$	4.0			3.4		pts	$	2.3			4.2		pts
Catastrophes		-			0.0	%			1.6			4.0	%			1.6			4.0	%			-			-		pts		(0.2	)		(0.2	)	pts		(0.2	)		(0.2	)	pts
Total segment	$	32.2			81.9	%		$	2.3			5.8	%		$	34.5			87.7	%		$	(1.7	)		0.8		pts	$	3.8			3.2		pts	$	2.1			4.0		pts

Variance 2011/2010
Attritional	$	(8.1	)		(9.1	)	pts	$	(0.7	)		(1.8	)	pts	$	(8.9	)		(10.9	)	pts
Catastrophes		1.3			3.9		pts		(2.1	)		(5.5	)	pts		(0.8	)		(1.6	)	pts
Total segment	$	(6.8	)		(5.2	)	pts	$	(2.8	)		(7.2	)	pts	$	(9.6	)		(12.4	)	pts

		Six Months Ended June 30,																						Six Months Ended June 30,
		Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/					Current			Ratio %/				Prior			Ratio %/				Total			Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions)		Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change					Year			Pt Change				Years			Pt Change				Incurred			Pt Change
2012
Attritional																								$	164.9			75.2	%		$	3.3			1.5	%		$	168.2			76.7	%
Catastrophes																									-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%			-			0.0	%
Total segment																								$	164.9			75.2	%		$	3.3			1.5	%		$	168.2			76.7	%

2011
Attritional		$	50.1			66.4	%		$	(0.7	)		-0.9	%		$	49.4			65.5	%			$	186.9		��	78.6	%		$	(5.4	)		-2.3	%		$	181.5			76.3	%
Catastrophes			1.3			1.7	%			(0.5	)		-0.7	%			0.7			1.0	%				-			0.0	%			0.2			0.1	%			0.2			0.1	%
Total segment		$	51.4			68.1	%		$	(1.2	)		-1.6	%		$	50.1			66.5	%			$	186.9			78.6	%		$	(5.2	)		-2.2	%		$	181.7			76.4	%

2010
Attritional		$	58.8			75.1	%		$	0.5			0.6	%		$	59.2			75.7	%
Catastrophes			-			0.0	%			2.7			3.5	%			2.7			3.5	%
Total segment		$	58.8			75.1	%		$	3.2			4.1	%		$	62.0			79.2	%

Variance 2011/2010
Variance 2012/2011
Attritional		$	(8.7	)		(8.7	)	pts	$	(1.2	)		(1.5	)	pts	$	(9.8	)		(10.2	)	pts		$	(22.0	)		(3.4	)	pts	$	8.7			3.8		pts	$	(13.3	)		0.4		pts
Catastrophes			1.3			1.7		pts		(3.2	)		(4.2	)	pts		(2.0	)		(2.5	)	pts			-			-		pts		(0.2	)		(0.1	)	pts		(0.2	)		(0.1	)	pts
Total segment		$	(7.4	)		(7.0	)	pts	$	(4.4	)		(5.7	)	pts	$	(11.9	)		(12.7	)	pts		$	(22.0	)		(3.4	)	pts	$	8.5			3.7		pts	$	(13.5	)		0.3		pts

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)	(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)																						(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses and LAE increased by $2.1 million, or 2.3%, to $92.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $90.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011. This was due primarily to an increase of $2.3 million (4.2 points) in attritional losses driven by the impact of changes in our affiliated quota share agreements.

Incurred losses and LAE decreased by ~~27.9%~~$13.5 million, or 7.4%, to $24.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $34.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, due primarily to the Deep Water Horizon rig loss included in the 2010 attritional losses, as well as changes in the mix of business.

~~Incurred losses and LAE decreased by 19.1% to $50.1~~$168.2 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011~~2012 compared to ~~$62.0~~$181.7 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2010,~~2011. This was primarily due ~~primarily~~ to ~~the Deep Water Horizon rig losses included~~a decrease of $22.0 million (3.4 points) in ~~the 2010~~current year attritional losses driven by the decline in premiums earned and ~~changes~~a shift in the mix of ~~business.~~business towards short-tail business with lower loss ratios.

Segment Expenses. Commission and brokerage expenses decreased ~~17.1%~~ to ~~$7.4~~$1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $8.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and decreased to $12.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to ~~$9.0~~$15.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011. These declines were mainly due to changes in distribution with a higher proportion of business being done on a direct basis, which carries a lower commission expense and changes in our affiliated quota share agreements.

Segment other underwriting expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2012 increased to $24.5 million from $22.4 million for the three months ended June 30, ~~2010. Commission and brokerage~~2011. Segment other underwriting expenses ~~decreased 12.0%~~for the six months ended June 30, 2012 increased to ~~$15.4~~$46.6 million from $44.3 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2011 compared to $17.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decreases~~2011. These increases were primarily due to ~~lower premiums earned and the changes in the mix of business, with a~~ higher ~~level of primary A&H business, which carries a lower commission ratio.~~

Segment other underwriting expenses decreased to $2.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $2.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Segment other underwriting expenses decreased to $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $4.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.employee benefit plan expenses.

4140

Table of Contents

~~International.~~

~~The following table presents the underwriting results and ratios for the International segment for the periods indicated.~~

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
(Dollars in millions) 2011 2010 Variance % Change 2011 2010 Variance % Change
Gross written premiums $ 288.7 $ 307.0 $ (18.2 ) -5.9 % $ 597.6 $ 582.3 $ 15.2 2.6 %
Net written premiums 141.5 166.0 (24.5 ) -14.8 % 299.6 311.3 (11.6 ) -3.7 %

Premiums earned $ 162.4 $ 154.7 $ 7.7 5.0 % $ 328.9 $ 301.8 $ 27.2 9.0 %
Incurred losses and LAE 90.9 124.1 (33.2 ) -26.8 % 409.7 360.6 49.1 13.6 %
Commission and brokerage 32.9 37.3 (4.3 ) -11.6 % 70.1 67.7 2.3 3.5 %
Other underwriting expenses 7.0 7.3 (0.4 ) -4.9 % 13.4 13.7 (0.3 ) -2.2 %
Underwriting gain (loss) $ 31.7 $ (14.0 ) $ 45.6 NM $ (164.2 ) $ (140.2 ) $ (24.0 ) 17.1 %

Point Chg Point Chg
Loss ratio 55.9 % 80.2 % (24.3 ) 124.5 % 119.5 % 5.0
Commission and brokerage ratio 20.3 % 24.1 % (3.8 ) 21.3 % 22.4 % (1.1 )
Other underwriting expense ratio 4.3 % 4.7 % (0.4 ) 4.1 % 4.6 % (0.5 )
Combined ratio 80.5 % 109.0 % (28.5 ) 149.9 % 146.5 % 3.4

(NM, not meaningful)
(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

~~Premiums.~~ Gross written premiums decreased by 5.9% to $288.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $307.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 due to a decrease in premiums written through Asia and Canada, partially offset by a net increase in business written in the Latin America, South America, Middle East, and Africa regions. Non-renewed business in certain catastrophe exposed territories that have not responded to the recent elevation in catastrophe loss activity resulted in the overall decline in writings, partially offset by generally higher rate levels on retained business and favorable foreign exchange impact of $14.2 million. Net written premiums decreased by 14.8% to $141.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $166.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010, principally as a result of the decrease in gross written premiums and change in the affiliated quota share agreement. Premiums earned increased by 5.0% to $162.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $154.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums is the result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation of the coverage period.

Gross written premiums increased by 2.6% to $597.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $582.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 due to a net increase in premiums written in the Latin America, Middle East, and Africa regions and favorable foreign exchange impact of $22.1 million, partially offset by lower premium in Asia and Canada. Growth from increased rate levels, particularly in regions recently affected by catastrophe losses was partially offset by non-renewed business which did not meet our current pricing targets. Net written premiums decreased by 3.7% to $299.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $311.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to the change in our affiliated quota share agreement. Premiums earned increased by 9.0% to $328.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $301.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The change in premiums earned relative to net written premiums is the result of timing; premiums are earned ratably over the coverage period whereas written premiums are recorded at the initiation of the coverage period.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Incurred Losses and LAE.~~ ~~The following tables present the incurred losses and LAE for the International segment for the periods indicated.~~

Three Months Ended June 30,
Current Ratio %/ Prior Ratio %/ Total Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change
2011
Attritional $ 67.3 41.4 % $ (8.1 ) -5.0 % $ 59.2 36.4 %
Catastrophes 32.8 20.2 % (1.1 ) -0.7 % 31.7 19.5 %
Total segment $ 100.1 61.6 % $ (9.2 ) -5.7 % $ 90.9 55.9 %

2010
Attritional $ 83.8 54.1 % $ (2.0 ) -1.3 % $ 81.7 52.8 %
Catastrophes 48.7 31.5 % (6.3 ) -4.1 % 42.3 27.4 %
Total segment $ 132.4 85.6 % $ (8.3 ) -5.4 % $ 124.1 80.2 %

Variance 2011/2010
Attritional $ (16.5 ) (12.7 ) pts $ (6.1 ) (3.7 ) pts $ (22.5 ) (16.4 ) pts
Catastrophes (15.9 ) (11.3 ) pts 5.2 3.4 pts (10.6 ) (7.9 ) pts
Total segment $ (32.3 ) (24.0 ) pts $ (0.9 ) (0.3 ) pts $ (33.2 ) (24.3 ) pts

Six Months Ended June 30,
Current Ratio %/ Prior Ratio %/ Total Ratio %/
(Dollars in millions) Year Pt Change Years Pt Change Incurred Pt Change
2011
Attritional $ 141.5 42.9 % $ (12.0 ) -3.6 % $ 129.5 39.3 %
Catastrophes 279.3 84.9 % 0.9 0.3 % 280.2 85.2 %
Total segment $ 420.8 127.8 % $ (11.1 ) -3.3 % $ 409.7 124.5 %

2010
Attritional $ 175.1 58.0 % $ (5.5 ) -1.8 % $ 169.6 56.2 %
Catastrophes 198.2 65.7 % (7.2 ) -2.4 % 191.0 63.3 %
Total segment $ 373.2 123.7 % $ (12.7 ) -4.2 % $ 360.6 119.5 %

Variance 2011/2010
Attritional $ (33.6 ) (15.1 ) pts $ (6.5 ) (1.8 ) pts $ (40.1 ) (16.9 ) pts
Catastrophes 81.1 19.2 pts 8.1 2.7 pts 89.2 21.9 pts
Total segment $ 47.6 4.1 pts $ 1.6 0.9 pts $ 49.1 5.0 pts

(Some amounts may not reconcile due to rounding.)

Incurred losses and LAE decreased 26.8% to $90.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $124.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was principally due to a $22.5 million (16.4 points) decrease in attritional losses and lower current year catastrophe losses. Current year catastrophes decreased $15.9 million (11.3 points) due to Japan and New Zealand earthquakes, and the wildfire loss in Alberta, Canada in 2011, compared to the higher catastrophe losses reported in the second quarter of 2010 (Chile earthquake).

Incurred losses and LAE increased 13.6% to $409.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $360.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The increase was principally due to a $81.1 million (19.2 points) increase in current year catastrophes related to the Japan and New Zealand earthquakes, the Australia floods, and the wildfire loss in Alberta, Canada, compared to the 2010 reported catastrophe losses (Chile earthquake and Australia hailstorms). The current year attritional loss ratio decreased to 42.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2011 from 58.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2010, primarily due to a shift in the mix of business with a lower level of quota share business, which generally carries a higher loss ratio, in addition to the impact of changes in the affiliated quota share agreement.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Segment Expenses.~~ Commission and brokerage expenses decreased 11.6% to $32.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $37.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Commission and brokerage expenses increased 3.5% to $70.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $67.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010. These variances were due to the changes in premiums and the mix of business.

Segment other underwriting expenses decreased to $7.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $7.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Segment other underwriting expenses decreased to $13.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared to $13.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

Market Sensitive Instruments.

The SEC’s Financial Reporting Release #48 requires registrants to clarify and expand upon the existing financial statement disclosure requirements for derivative financial instruments, derivative commodity instruments and other financial instruments (collectively, “market sensitive instruments”). We do not generally enter into market sensitive instruments for trading purposes.

Our current investment strategy seeks to maximize after-tax income through a high quality, diversified, taxable and tax-preferenced fixed maturity portfolio, while maintaining an adequate level of liquidity. Our mix of taxable and tax-preferenced investments is adjusted periodically, consistent with our current and projected operating results, market conditions and our tax position. The fixed maturity securities in the investment portfolio are comprised of non-trading available for sale securities. Additionally, we have invested in equity securities.

The overall investment strategy considers the scope of present and anticipated Company operations. In particular, estimates of the financial impact resulting from non-investment asset and liability transactions, together with our capital structure and other factors, are used to develop a net liability analysis. This analysis includes estimated payout characteristics for which our investments provide liquidity. This analysis is considered in the development of specific investment strategies for asset allocation, duration and credit quality. The change in overall market sensitive risk exposure principally reflects the asset changes that took place during the period.

Interest Rate Risk. Our ~~$8.4~~$8.8 billion investment portfolio, at June 30, ~~2011,~~2012, is principally comprised of fixed maturity securities, which are generally subject to interest rate risk and some foreign currency exchange rate risk, and some equity securities, which are subject to price fluctuations and some foreign exchange rate risk. The overall economic impact of the foreign exchange risks on the investment portfolio is partially mitigated by changes in the dollar value of foreign currency denominated liabilities and their associated income statement impact.

Interest rate risk is the potential change in value of the fixed maturity securities portfolio, including short-term investments, from a change in market interest rates. In a declining interest rate environment, it includes prepayment risk on the ~~$415.5~~$610.2 million of mortgage-backed securities in the ~~$5,428.2~~$5,291.0 million fixed maturity portfolio. Prepayment risk results from potential accelerated principal payments that shorten the average life and thus the expected yield of the security.

~~Table of Contents~~

The table below displays the potential impact of market value fluctuations and after-tax unrealized appreciation on our fixed maturity portfolio (including ~~$566.1~~$580.8 million of short-term investments) for the periods indicated based on upward and downward parallel and immediate 100 and 200 basis point shifts in interest rates. For legal entities with a U.S. dollar functional currency, this modeling was performed on each security individually. To generate appropriate price estimates for mortgage-backed securities, changes in prepayment expectations under different interest rate environments were taken into account. For legal entities with non-U.S. dollar functional currency, the effective duration of the involved portfolio of securities was used as a proxy for the market value change under the various interest rate change scenarios.

	Impact of Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points															Impact of Interest Rate Shift in Basis Points
	At June 30, 2011															At June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)		-200			-100			0			100			200		-200			-100			0			100			200
Total Market/Fair Value	$	6,353.4		$	6,183.6		$	5,994.4		$	5,780.4		$	5,570.7		$	6,115.7		$	5,995.5		$	5,871.8		$	5,732.6		$	5,589.9
Market/Fair Value Change from Base (%)		6.0	%		3.2	%		0.0	%		-3.6	%		-7.1	%		4.2	%		2.1	%		0.0	%		-2.4	%		-4.8	%
Change in Unrealized Appreciation
After-tax from Base ($)	$	233.4		$	123.0		$	-		$	(139.1	)	$	(275.4	)	$	158.5		$	80.4		$	-		$	(90.5	)	$	(183.2	)

We had ~~$8,275.6~~$8,013.7 million and ~~$7,652.3~~$8,290.6 million of gross reserves for losses and LAE as of June 30, ~~2011~~2012 and December 31, ~~2010,~~2011, respectively. These amounts are recorded at their nominal value, as opposed to present value, which would reflect a discount adjustment to reflect the time value of money. Since losses are paid out over a period of time, the present value of the reserves is less than the nominal value. As

Table of Contents

interest rates rise, the present value of the reserves decreases and, conversely, as interest rates decline, the present value increases. These movements are the opposite of the interest rate impacts on the fair value of investments. While the difference between present value and nominal value is not reflected in our financial statements, our financial results will include investment income over time from the investment portfolio until the claims are paid. Our loss and loss reserve obligations have an expected duration that is reasonably consistent with our fixed income portfolio.

Equity Risk. Equity risk is the potential change in fair and/or market value of the common stock and preferred stock portfolios arising from changing prices. Our equity investments consist of a diversified portfolio of individual securities and mutual funds, which invest principally in high quality common and preferred stocks that are traded on major exchanges. The primary objective of the equity portfolio is to obtain greater total return relative to bonds over time through market appreciation and income.

The table below displays the impact on fair/market value and after-tax change in fair/market value of a 10% and 20% change in equity prices up and down for the periods indicated.

	Impact of Percentage Change in Equity Fair/Market Values												Impact of Percentage Change in Equity Fair/Market Values
	At June 30, 2011												At June 30, 2012
(Dollars in millions)		-20%			-10%			0%		10%		20%	-20%			-10%			0%		10%		20%
Fair/Market Value of the Equity Portfolio	$	778.3		$	875.5		$	972.8	$	1,070.1	$	1,167.4	$	930.9		$	1,047.2		$	1,163.6	$	1,279.9	$	1,396.3
After-tax Change in Fair/Market Value		(126.5	)		(63.2	)		-		63.2		126.5		(151.3	)		(75.6	)		-		75.6		151.3

Foreign Exchange Risk. Foreign currency risk is the potential change in value, income and cash flow arising from adverse changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Each of our non-U.S. (“foreign”) operations maintains capital in the currency of the country of its geographic location consistent with local regulatory guidelines. Each foreign operation may conduct business in its local currency, as well as the currency of other countries in which it operates. The primary foreign currency exposures for these foreign operations are the Singapore and Canadian ~~Dollars, the British Pound Sterling and the Euro.~~Dollars. We mitigate foreign exchange exposure by generally matching the currency and duration of our assets to our corresponding operating liabilities. In accordance with FASB guidance, we translate the assets, liabilities and income of non-U.S. dollar functional currency legal entities to the U.S. dollar. This translation amount is reported as a component of other comprehensive income. As of June 30, ~~2011,~~2012, there has been no material change in exposure to foreign exchange rates as compared to December 31, ~~2010.~~2011.

~~Table of Contents~~

SAFE HARBOR DISCLOSURE

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the U.S. federal securities laws. We intend these forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements in the federal securities laws. In some cases, these statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking words such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “expect”, “plan”, “believe”, “predict”, “potential” and “intend”. Forward-looking statements contained in this report include information regarding our reserves for losses and LAE, the adequacy of our provision for uncollectible balances, estimates of our catastrophe exposure, the effects of catastrophic events on our financial statements and the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends. Forward-looking statements only reflect our expectations and are not guarantees of performance. These statements involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Actual events or results may differ materially from our expectations. Important factors that could cause our actual events or results to be materially different from our expectations include ~~the uncertainties that surround the impact on our financial statements and liquidity resulting from changes in the global economy and credit markets, the estimating of reserves for losses and LAE,~~ those discussed ~~in Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) included in this report and risks described~~ under the caption “Risk Factors” in our most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K, Part 1, ~~ITEM~~Item 1A. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

~~ITEM 3.~~

~~QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK~~

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk Instruments. See “Market Sensitive Instruments” in PART I – ITEM 2.

~~ITEM 4.~~

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of the end of the period covered by this report, our management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)). Based on their evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Our management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, also conducted an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the quarter covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation, there has been no such change during the quarter covered by this report.

PART II

~~ITEM 1.~~

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of business, ~~we are~~the Company is involved in lawsuits, arbitrations and other formal and informal dispute resolution procedures, the outcomes of which will determine ~~our~~the Company’s rights and obligations under insurance and reinsurance ~~and~~agreements. In some disputes, the Company seeks to enforce its rights under an agreement or to collect funds owing to it. In other ~~contractual agreements.~~matters, the Company is resisting attempts by others to collect funds or enforce alleged rights. These disputes arise from time to time and are ultimately resolved through both informal and formal means, including negotiated resolution, arbitration and litigation. In all such matters, ~~we believe~~the Company believes that ~~our~~its positions are legally and commercially ~~reasonable, and we vigorously seek to preserve, enforce and defend our legal rights under various agreements.~~reasonable. The Company considers the statuses of these proceedings ~~are considered~~ when ~~we determine our~~determining its reserves for ~~losses~~unpaid loss and loss adjustment expenses. While the final outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe that any of these matters, when finally resolved, will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or liquidity. However, an adverse resolution of one or more of these items in any one quarter or fiscal year could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations in that period.

~~There are no known significant pending legal issues~~Aside from litigation and arbitrations related to these insurance and reinsurance agreements, the Company is not ~~involving insurance~~a party to any other material litigation or ~~reinsurance business activity.~~arbitration.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~ITEM 1A.~~

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

No material changes.

~~ITEM 2.~~

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

~~ITEM 4.~~

~~RESERVED~~ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

~~ITEM 5.~~

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

~~ITEM 6.~~

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit Index:

Exhibit No.		Description

	31.1	Section 302 Certification of Joseph V. Taranto

	31.2	Section 302 Certification of ~~Dominic J. Addesso~~Craig Howie

	32.1	Section 906 Certification of Joseph V. Taranto and ~~Dominic J. Addesso~~Craig Howie

	101.INS	XBRL Instance Document

	101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

	101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

	101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

	101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase

	101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

4744

Table of Contents

Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc.

Signatures


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

~~Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc.~~

~~Signatures~~

~~Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this~~ ~~report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.~~


	Everest Reinsurance Holdings, Inc.
	(Registrant)


	~~/S/ DOMINIC J. ADDESSO~~ /S/ CRAIG HOWIE
	~~Dominic J. Addesso~~Craig Howie
	Executive Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer

	(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)



Dated: August ~~15, 2011~~14, 2012

(Dollars in thousands)
Cumulative-effect adjustment, gross	$	23,846
Tax		(8,346	)
Cumulative-effect adjustment, net	$	15,500

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
Specialty Underwriting	June 30,						June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2011			2010			2011		2010
Gross written premiums	$	66,367		$	65,855		$	135,537	$	131,742
Net written premiums		35,500			37,823			75,882		75,062

Premiums earned	$	33,057		$	39,342		$	75,451	$	78,240
Incurred losses and LAE		24,891			34,512			50,148		61,973
Commission and brokerage		7,439			8,972			15,404		17,507
Other underwriting expenses		2,001			2,407			4,005		4,358
Underwriting gain (loss)	$	(1,274	)	$	(6,549	)	$	5,894	$	(5,598	)