Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q 
(Mark One)
ýQuarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 20172018
or
¨Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the Transition Period from              to             
Commission File Number 001-12755 
 
Dean Foods Company
(Exact name of the registrant as specified in its charter)
deanlogo.jpg
 
Delaware 75-2559681
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. employer
identification no.)
2711 North Haskell Avenue, Suite 3400
Dallas, Texas 75204
(214) 303-3400
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of the registrant’s principal executive offices) 
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  ý    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):
Large accelerated filerý  Accelerated filer¨
    
Non-accelerated filer¨(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company¨
      
    Emerging growth company
¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.)    Yes  ¨    No  ý
As of August 3, 2017,2, 2018, the number of shares of the registrant's common stock outstanding was: 90,915,174.91,374,424.
Common Stock, par value $.01

Table of Contents
 
   Page
    
Item 1
Item 2
Item 3
Item 4
    
    
Item 1A
Item 6
    
  


Part I — Financial Information
Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$31,509
 $17,980
$25,434
 $16,512
Receivables, net of allowances of $6,189 and $5,118601,869
 669,200
Receivables, net of allowances of $3,949 and $5,583593,207
 675,826
Income tax receivable7,191
 5,578
1,461
 2,140
Inventories287,222
 284,484
276,656
 278,063
Deferred income taxes
 37,504
Prepaid expenses and other current assets40,292
 43,884
41,396
 47,338
Assets held for sale5,127
 
Total current assets968,083
 1,058,630
943,281
 1,019,879
Property, plant and equipment, net1,124,089
 1,163,851
1,001,808
 1,094,064
Goodwill167,535
 154,112
190,707
 167,535
Identifiable intangible and other assets, net213,231
 207,897
207,684
 211,620
Deferred income taxes21,310
 21,737
14,083
 10,731
Total$2,494,248
 $2,606,227
$2,357,563
 $2,503,829
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Current liabilities:      
Accounts payable and accrued expenses$655,298
 $706,981
$642,514
 $671,070
Current portion of debt142,173
 140,806
1,150
 1,125
Total current liabilities797,471
 847,787
643,664
 672,195
Long-term debt, net762,125
 745,245
855,809
 912,074
Deferred income taxes99,942
 126,009
50,450
 60,018
Other long-term liabilities226,499
 276,630
190,179
 203,595
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
 
Stockholders’ equity:      
Preferred stock, none issued
 

 
Common stock, 90,913,564 and 90,586,741 shares issued and outstanding, with a par value of $0.01 per share909
 906
Common stock, 91,368,529 and 91,123,759 shares issued and outstanding, with a par value of $0.01 per share914
 911
Additional paid-in capital656,721
 653,629
662,883
 659,227
Retained earnings36,938
 45,654
33,943
 74,219
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(86,357) (89,633)(92,031) (78,410)
Total Dean Foods Company stockholders’ equity605,709
 655,947
Non-controlling interest11,752
 
Total stockholders’ equity608,211
 610,556
617,461
 655,947
Total$2,494,248
 $2,606,227
$2,357,563
 $2,503,829
See Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
Three Months Ended 
 June 30
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30
Three Months Ended 
 June 30
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30
2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
Net sales$1,926,722
 $1,848,788
 $3,922,408
 $3,727,616
$1,951,230
 $1,926,722
 $3,931,737
 $3,922,408
Cost of sales1,459,342
 1,355,535
 2,992,903
 2,730,295
1,518,446
 1,459,242
 3,050,450
 2,992,709
Gross profit467,380
 493,253
 929,505
 997,321
432,784
 467,480
 881,287
 929,699
Operating costs and expenses:              
Selling and distribution338,144
 331,150
 683,340
 664,037
336,721
 338,010
 682,717
 683,073
General and administrative73,100
 86,614
 172,636
 171,765
65,972
 72,281
 141,494
 170,945
Amortization of intangibles5,155
 4,120
 10,310
 10,445
5,078
 5,155
 10,156
 10,310
Facility closing and reorganization costs, net5,817
 (1,400) 15,103
 (234)67,661
 5,817
 76,123
 15,103
Impairment of long-lived assets2,232
 
 2,232
 
Other operating income(2,289) 
 (2,289) 
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated affiliate(1,699) 
 (3,599) 
Total operating costs and expenses422,216
 420,484
 881,389
 846,013
473,676
 421,263
 906,834
 879,431
Operating income45,164
 72,769
 48,116
 151,308
Other (income) expense:       
Operating income (loss)(40,892) 46,217
 (25,547) 50,268
Other expense:       
Interest expense16,419
 16,830
 33,883
 33,706
14,069
 16,419
 28,102
 33,883
Other income, net(805) (2,210) (1,761) (3,207)
Other expense, net782
 248
 1,252
 391
Total other expense15,614
 14,620
 32,122
 30,499
14,851
 16,667
 29,354
 34,274
Income before income taxes29,550
 58,149
 15,994
 120,809
Income tax expense11,903
 24,778
 8,106
 48,237
Net income$17,647
 $33,371
 $7,888
 $72,572
Income (loss) before income taxes(55,743) 29,550
 (54,901) 15,994
Income tax expense (benefit)(13,727) 11,903
 (12,620) 8,106
Income (loss) from continuing operations(42,016) 17,647
 (42,281) 7,888
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax1,922
 
 1,922
 
Net income (loss)(40,094) 17,647
 (40,359) 7,888
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interest
 
 
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Dean Foods Company$(40,094) $17,647
 $(40,359) $7,888
Average common shares:              
Basic90,882,415
 91,244,745
 90,796,585
 91,406,969
91,342,652
 90,882,415
 91,267,748
 90,796,585
Diluted91,369,030
 91,679,813
 91,365,946
 91,995,078
91,342,652
 91,369,030
 91,267,748
 91,365,946
Basic income per common share:       
Net income$0.19
 $0.37
 $0.09
 $0.79
Diluted income per common share:       
Net income$0.19
 $0.36
 $0.09
 $0.79
Basic income (loss) per common share:       
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company$(0.46) $0.19
 $(0.46) $0.09
Income from discontinued operations attributable to Dean Foods Company0.02
 
 0.02
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Dean Foods Company$(0.44) $0.19
 $(0.44) $0.09
Diluted income (loss) per common share:       
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company$(0.46) $0.19
 $(0.46) $0.09
Income from discontinued operations attributable to Dean Foods Company0.02
 
 0.02
 
Net income (loss) attributable to Dean Foods Company$(0.44) $0.19
 $(0.44) $0.09
Cash dividends declared per common share$0.09
 $0.09
 $0.18
 $0.18
$0.09
 $0.09
 $0.18
 $0.18
See Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Three Months Ended 
 June 30
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30
Three Months Ended 
 June 30
 Six Months Ended 
 June 30
2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
Net income$17,647
 $33,371
 $7,888
 $72,572
Net income (loss)$(40,094) $17,647
 $(40,359) $7,888
Other comprehensive income (loss):              
Cumulative translation adjustments
 (1,208) 
 (1,055)
Pension and other postretirement liability adjustment, net of tax1,632
 1,550
 3,276
 3,035
1,602
 1,632
 3,226
 3,276
Other comprehensive income1,632
 342
 3,276
 1,980
1,602
 1,632
 3,226
 3,276
Comprehensive income$19,279
 $33,713
 $11,164
 $74,552
Reclassification of stranded tax effects related to the Tax Act(1)


 
 (16,847) 
Comprehensive income (loss)(38,492) 19,279
 (53,980) 11,164
Comprehensive (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interest
 
 
 
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Dean Foods Company$(38,492) $19,279
 $(53,980) $11,164
(1)
Refer to Note 1 - Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements within our Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on the adoption of Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2018-02 during the first quarter of 2018.
See Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
 Common Stock   Retained Earnings Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity 
 Shares Amount 
Additional
Paid-In Capital
   
Balance, January 1, 201790,586,741
 $906
 $653,629
 $45,654
 $(89,633) $610,556
Issuance of common stock326,823
 3
 (883) 
 
 (880)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 3,975
 
 
 3,975
Net income
 
 
 7,888
 
 7,888
Dividends
 
 
 (16,604) 
 (16,604)
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Pension and other postretirement benefit liability adjustment, net of tax of $2,057
 
 
 
 3,276
 3,276
Balance, June 30, 201790,913,564
 $909
 $656,721
 $36,938
 $(86,357) $608,211
 Dean Foods Company Stockholders    
 Common Stock   Retained Earnings Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
 
Non-
controlling
Interest
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity 
 Shares Amount 
Additional
Paid-In Capital
    
Balance, January 1, 201891,123,759
 $911
 $659,227
 $74,219
 $(78,410) $
 $655,947
Issuance of common stock244,770
 3
 (36) 
 
 
 (33)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 3,692
 
 
 
 3,692
Reclassification of stranded tax effects related to the Tax Act(1)
 
 
 16,847
 (16,847) 
 
Net loss attributable to Dean Foods Company
 
 
 (40,359) 
 
 (40,359)
Fair value of non-controlling interest acquired
 
 
 
 
 11,752
 11,752
Dividends
 
 
 (16,764) 
 
 (16,764)
Other comprehensive income:             
Pension and other postretirement benefit liability adjustment, net of tax of $1,060
 
 
 
 3,226
 
 3,226
Balance, June 30, 201891,368,529
 $914
 $662,883
 $33,943
 $(92,031) $11,752
 $617,461
(1)
Refer to Note 1 - Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements within our Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on the adoption of ASU No. 2018-02 during the first quarter of 2018.
See Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except share data)
 Common Stock       
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 Shares Amount 
Additional
Paid-In Capital
 
Retained Earnings
(Accumulated
Deficit)
 
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance, January 1, 201691,428,274
 $914
 $679,916
 $(49,523) $(85,803) $545,504
Issuance of common stock, net of tax impact of share-based compensation354,443
 4
 (1,956) 
 
 (1,952)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 4,276
 
 
 4,276
Repurchase of common stock(1,371,185) (14) (24,986) 
 
 (25,000)
Net income
 
 
 72,572
 
 72,572
Dividends
 
 (8,390) (8,283) 
 (16,673)
Other comprehensive income (loss):           
Cumulative translation adjustment
 
 
 
 (1,055) (1,055)
Pension and other postretirement benefit liability adjustment, net of tax of $1,728
 
 
 
 3,035
 3,035
Balance, June 30, 201690,411,532
 $904
 $648,860
 $14,766
 $(83,823) $580,707
 Common Stock       
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 Shares Amount 
Additional
Paid-In Capital
 Retained Earnings 
Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance, January 1, 201790,586,741
 $906
 $653,629
 $45,654
 $(89,633) $610,556
Issuance of common stock326,823
 3
 (883) 
 
 (880)
Share-based compensation expense
 
 3,975
 
 
 3,975
Net income
 
 
 7,888
 
 7,888
Dividends
 
 
 (16,604) 
 (16,604)
Other comprehensive income:           
Pension and other postretirement benefit liability adjustment, net of tax of $2,057
 
 
 
 3,276
 3,276
Balance, June 30, 201790,913,564
 $909
 $656,721
 $36,938
 $(86,357) $608,211
See Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


DEAN FOODS COMPANY
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
Six Months Ended 
 June 30
Six Months Ended 
 June 30
2017 20162018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net income$7,888
 $72,572
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Net income (loss)$(40,359) $7,888
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax(1,922) 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization86,489
 87,876
80,102
 86,489
Share-based compensation expense6,659
 11,797
6,625
 6,659
(Gain) loss on divestitures and other, net3,423
 (4,984)
Non-cash facility closing and reorganization costs, net43,734
 4,750
Impairment of long-lived assets2,232
 
Write-off of financing costs1,080
 

 1,080
Other operating income(2,289) 
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated affiliate(3,599) 
Deferred income taxes7,533
 17,577
(16,472) 7,533
Other, net(1,269) (9,626)(1,100) (2,596)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:      
Receivables, net68,351
 79,875
84,105
 68,351
Inventories3,555
 (307)2,220
 3,555
Prepaid expenses and other assets8,837
 10,454
10,263
 8,837
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(73,253) (115,915)(43,459) (73,253)
Income taxes receivable/payable(1,613) (5,147)
Litigation settlement
 (18,853)
Income taxes receivable679
 (1,613)
Contributions to company sponsored pension plans(38,500) 

 (38,500)
Net cash provided by operating activities79,180
 125,319
120,760
 79,180
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Payments for property, plant and equipment(34,551) (45,752)(37,292) (34,551)
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired(21,596) (157,321)(13,324) (21,596)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets2,481
 10,711
12,418
 2,481
Other investments(9,000) 

 (9,000)
Net cash used in investing activities(62,666) (192,362)(38,198) (62,666)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Repayments of debt(832) (895)(589) (832)
Payments of financing costs(1,764) 

 (1,764)
Proceeds from senior secured revolver120,900
 118,100
185,800
 120,900
Payments for senior secured revolver(128,700) (104,800)(197,000) (128,700)
Proceeds from receivables securitization facility1,120,000
 130,000
1,240,000
 1,120,000
Payments for receivables securitization facility(1,095,000) (70,000)(1,285,000) (1,095,000)
Repurchase of common stock
 (25,000)
Cash dividends paid(16,357) (16,514)(16,438) (16,357)
Issuance of common stock, net of share repurchases for withholding taxes(1,232) (646)(413) (1,232)
Tax savings on share-based compensation
 699
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(2,985) 30,944
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 (825)
Change in cash and cash equivalents13,529
 (36,924)
Net cash used in financing activities(73,640) (2,985)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents8,922
 13,529
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period17,980
 60,734
16,512
 17,980
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period$31,509
 $23,810
$25,434
 $31,509
See Notes to unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

DEAN FOODS COMPANY
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 20172018 and 20162017
(Unaudited)
1. General
Nature of Our Business — We are a leading food and beverage company and the largest processor and direct-to-store distributor of fresh fluid milk and other dairy and dairy case products in the United States, with a vision to be the most admired and trusted provider of wholesome, great-tasting dairy products at every occasion.
We manufacture, market and distribute a wide variety of branded and private label dairy and dairy case products, including fluid milk, ice cream, cultured dairy products, creamers, ice cream mix and other dairy products to retailers, distributors, foodservice outlets, educational institutions and governmental entities across the United States. Our portfolio includes DairyPure®, the country's first and largest fresh, white milk national brand, and TruMoo®, the leading national flavored milk brand, along with well-known regional dairy brands such as Alta Dena®, Berkeley Farms®, Country Fresh®, Dean’s®, Friendly's®, Garelick Farms®, LAND O LAKES ® milk and cultured products (licensed brand), Lehigh Valley Dairy Farms®, Mayfield ®, McArthur®, Meadow Gold ®, Oak Farms®, PET ® (licensed brand), T.G. Lee®, Tuscan® and more. In all, we have more than 50 national, regional and local dairy brands, as well as private labels. Additionally, with our acquisition of Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc., which was completed on June 22, 2017, we nowWe also sell and distribute organic juice, probiotic-infused juices, and fruit-infused waters under the Uncle Matt's Organic® brand. Additionally, we are party to the Organic Valley Fresh joint venture which distributes organic milk under the Organic Valley®brand to retailers. With our majority interest acquisition of Good Karma Foods, Inc., which was completed on June 29, 2018, we now sell and distribute flax-based milk and yogurt products under the Good Karma® brand. Dean Foods also makes and distributes ice cream, cultured products, juices, teas and bottled water. Due to the perishable nature of our products, we deliver the majority of our products directly to our customers’ locations in refrigerated trucks or trailers that we own or lease. We believe that we have one of the most extensive refrigerated direct-to-store delivery ("DSD") systems in the United States. We sell our products primarily on a local or regional basis through our local and regional sales forces, and in some instances, with the assistance of national brokers. Some national customer relationships are coordinated by our centralized corporate sales department or national brokers.
Basis of Presentation and Consolidation — The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q have been prepared on the same basis as the Consolidated Financial Statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162017 (the “2016“2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K”), which we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 22, 2017.26, 2018. The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and entities controlled by the Company through its direct ownership of a majority interest. The Company eliminates from its financial results all intercompany transactions between entities included in the consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, we have made all necessary adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) to present fairly, in all material respects, our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates and for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been omitted. Our results of operations for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 20172018 may not be indicative of our operating results for the full year. The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our 20162017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Unless otherwise indicated, references in this report to “we,” “us,” “our” or "the Company" refer to Dean Foods Company and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole.
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2016-09 — In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued ASU No. 2016-09, Compensation — Stock Compensation — Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 simplifies several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, the accounting for forfeitures, the classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and the classification of certain share-based payment transactions on the statement of cash flows. We adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2017, and it has been applied in accordance with the transition methods specified in the guidance. As permitted by the standard, we have not changed our accounting policy for forfeitures of share-based awards and will continue estimating forfeitures when determining compensation cost to be recognized over the vesting period. The presentation of excess tax benefits of share-based awards on the statement of cash flows has been applied prospectively; therefore, cash flows related to excess tax benefits will no longer be separately classified as a financing activity apart from other income tax cash flows. In addition, we are now recording on a prospective basis excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies related to share-based payments within the provision for income taxes on the statement of operations rather than on the consolidated balance sheet within additional paid-in capital.
ASU No. 2015-17 — In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes — Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes. ASU 2015-17 simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The amendments eliminate the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 740 that requires an entity to separate deferred tax liabilities and

assets into a current amount and a noncurrent amount in a classified statement of financial position. We adopted this ASU on a prospective basis effective January 1, 2017.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Effective in 2018
ASU No. 2017-09 — In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The new guidance is intended to provide clarity and reduce both (1) diversity in practice and (2) cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The amendments provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. An entity should account for the effects of a modification unless all the following are met: 1) The fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value) of the modified award is the same as the fair value (or calculated value or intrinsic value) of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. If the modification does not affect any of the inputs to the valuation technique that the entity uses to value the award, the entity is not required to estimate the value immediately before and after the modification, 2) The vesting conditions of the modified award are the same as the vesting conditions of the original award immediately before the original award is modified, and 3) The classification of the modified award as an equity instrument or a liability instrument is the same as the classification of the original award immediately before the original award is modified. This guidance is effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The amendments should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. We do not intend to early adopt this ASU. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this standard will have on the presentation of our financial statements.
ASU No. 2017-07 — In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, Compensation — Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. The new guidance is intended to improve the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost. The amendments require that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net periodic benefit costs (which include interest costs, expected return on plan assets, amortization of prior service cost or credits and actuarial gains and losses) are to be reported separately and outside a subtotal of operating income, if one is presented. Currently, we record all components of net periodic benefit cost on the same line item as the employees' respective compensation expense. Beginning in the first quarter of 2018, we will be required to present net periodic cost for pension and postretirement benefits in accordance with the new guidance described above. For public companies, this guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The amendment should be applied on a retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued or made available for issuance. We do not intend to early adopt this ASU. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this standard will have on the presentation of our financial statements.
ASU No. 2017-03 — In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections and Investments — Equity Method and Joint Ventures: Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcements at the September 22, 2016 and November 17, 2016 Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") Meetings. The new guidance is intended to provide clarity in relation to the disclosure of the impact that ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2016-02, which are described below, will have on our financial statements when adopted. The effective date for this guidance is the same as the effective date for ASU 2014-09 and ASU 2016-02. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this standard will have on our financial statements.
ASU No. 2017-01 — In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business. The new guidance clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. For public companies, this standard is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. The amendments should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. Early application of the amendments is allowed with certain restrictions. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-01 to have a material impact on our financial statements and will prospectively apply the guidance to applicable transactions.
ASU No. 2016-16 — In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes: Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory. ASU 2016-16 reduces complexity by allowing the recognition of current and deferred income taxes for an intra-entity asset transfer (other than inventory) when the transfer occurs. The new guidance is intended to reduce the complexity of GAAP and diversity in practice related to the tax consequences of certain types of intra-entity asset transfers,

particularly those involving intellectual property. For public companies, this standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within those annual reporting periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual reporting period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued or made available for issuance. The amendments should be applied on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. We are currently evaluating the effect that the adoption of this standard will have on our financial statements.
ASU No. 2016-15 — In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows: Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The new guidance is intended to eliminate diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified in the statement of cash flows. The new standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, provided that all of the amendments are adopted in the same period. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-15 to have a material impact on our financial statements.
ASU No. 2016-01 — In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 supersedes existing guidance to classify equity securities with readily determinable fair values into different categories and requires equity securities to be measured at fair value with changes in the fair value recognized through net income. An entity’s equity investments that are accounted for under the equity method of accounting or result in consolidation of an investee are not included within the scope of this amended guidance. The amendments allow equity investments that do not have readily determinable fair values to be remeasured at fair value either upon the occurrence of an observable price change or upon identification of impairment. The amended guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The amendments in this ASU should be applied by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The amendments related to equity securities without readily determinable fair values (including disclosure requirements) should be applied prospectively to equity investments that exist as of the date of adoption of the ASU. Early application of certain amendments in this standard to financial statements of fiscal years and interim periods that have not yet been issued is permitted as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Except for the early application of certain amendments discussed above, early adoption of the standard is not permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-01 to have a material impact on our financial statements.
ASU No. 2014-09 — In May 2014, the FASB issuedAs of January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. The comprehensive new standard will supersedesupersedes existing revenue recognition guidance and requirerequires revenue to be recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. Adoption of the new rules could affect the timing of revenue recognition for certain transactions. Additionally,The Company adopted the new standard requires enhanced disclosures, including information regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts. The standard allows for either “full retrospective” adoption, meaning the standard is applied to all of the periods presented, or “modified retrospective” adoption, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements. The new standard was originally effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adoption was not permitted. On August 12, 2015, the FASB approved a one year delay of the effective date to reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, while permitting companies to voluntarily adopt the new standard as of the original effective date. In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which clarifies narrow aspects of ASC 606 or corrects unintended application of the guidance. The effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2016-20 are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2014-09.

We are currently evaluating the overall impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements. We have formed a steering committee comprised of subject matter experts within the Company to help assess the impact the guidance may have on the classification of bulk cream sales, which are currently presented as a reduction to cost of sales within our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as we believe this presentation allows us to report our true cost of fluid milk production. The steering committee is in the process of gathering and evaluating quantitative and qualitative information with respect to the Company’s bulk cream sales, which will assist in informing our conclusion with respect to the appropriate income statement presentation of such amounts under ASU 2014-09. Our assessment is ongoing and no final determinations have been made at this time.
Additionally, our evaluation includes the impact of the new standard on certain common practices currently employed by us and by other manufacturers of consumer products, such as slotting fees, co-operative advertising, rebates and other pricing allowances, merchandising funds and consumer coupons. We currently expect to adopt the ASU consistent with the deferred mandatory effective date of January 1, 2018 and to utilizeusing the modified retrospective transition method, which would result in an adjustment to retained earnings for the cumulative effect, if any, of applying the standard to contracts in process as of the adoption date.approach. Under this method we would not restate the prior financial statements presented; however, we would be required to provide

have provided additional disclosures, ofincluding the amount by which each financial statement line item is affected in the current reporting period, during 2018, as compared to the prior revenue recognition guidance. BasedAdditionally, we have provided a disaggregation of our revenue by source and product type and have also included certain qualitative information related to our revenue streams. See Note 2. The adoption of ASU 2014-09 did not materially impact our results of operations or financial position, except with respect to the change in classification of sales of excess raw materials.

The pro forma effect of the change in classification of sales of excess raw materials on our findingsunaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations was as follows (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
 As Previously ReportedPro Forma Results Assuming Retrospective Adoption of ASU 2014-09Increase (Decrease) to Previously Reported Amounts As Previously ReportedPro Forma Results Assuming Retrospective Adoption of ASU 2014-09Increase (Decrease) to Previously Reported Amounts
Net sales$1,926,722
$2,063,926
$137,204
 $3,922,408
$4,230,615
$308,207
Cost of sales1,459,342
1,596,546
137,204
 2,992,903
3,301,110
308,207
Gross profit467,380
467,380

 929,505
929,505

An adjustment to date,opening retained earnings was not required as the change in classification of sales of excess raw materials illustrated in the table above did not result in a change to the earnings reported in prior periods.
ASU No. 2017-07 — As of January 1, 2018, we adopted ASU 2017-07, Compensation — Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which requires employers who offer defined benefit pension plans or other post-retirement benefit plans to report the service cost component within the same income statement caption as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by employees during the period. The ASU also requires the other components of net periodic benefit cost to be presented separately from the service cost component, in a caption outside of a subtotal of income from operations. Additionally, the ASU provides that only the service cost component is eligible for capitalization. See Note 12 for further information on our pension and postretirement plans.
The effect of the retrospective presentation change related to the net periodic cost for pension and postretirement benefits on our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations was as follows (in thousands):
 Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
 As Previously ReportedAdjustment for Adoption of ASU 2017-07As Revised As Previously ReportedAdjustment for Adoption of ASU 2017-07As Revised
Cost of sales$1,459,342
$(100)$1,459,242
 $2,992,903
$(194)$2,992,709
Gross profit467,380
100
467,480
 929,505
194
929,699
Selling and distribution338,144
(134)338,010
 683,340
(267)683,073
General and administrative73,100
(819)72,281
 172,636
(1,691)170,945
Total operating costs and expenses422,216
(953)421,263
 881,389
(1,958)879,431
Operating income45,164
1,053
46,217
 48,116
2,152
50,268
Other (income) expense, net(805)1,053
248
 (1,761)2,152
391
ASU No. 2018-02 — We early adopted ASU 2018-02, Income Statement-Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, effective January 1, 2018 and have applied the guidance as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Our accounting policy is to release the income tax effects from accumulated other comprehensive income when a pension or other postretirement benefit plan is liquidated or extinguished. As permitted under ASU 2018-02, we have elected to record a one-time reclassification for the stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act") from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings in the amount of $16.8 million on our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet during the first quarter of 2018. The only impact of stranded tax effects resulting from the Tax Act is with respect to our pension and other postretirement benefit plans.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Effective in 2019
ASU No. 2017-12 — In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities. The new guidance improves the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted in any interim period after issuance of this guidance. We do not intend to early adopt this ASU. We do not currently expect the standardadoption of ASU 2017-12 to have a material impact on our results of operationsfinancial statements as our derivative instruments are not designated as cash flow or financial position; however,fair value hedges under Topic 815. See Note 8 for further information on our assessment is not yet complete. Throughout the remainder of 2017, we plan to finalize our review and method of adoption.
Effective in 2019derivative instruments.
ASU No. 2016-02 — In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases. ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities in the balance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements, such as information about variable lease payments and options to renew and terminate leases. The amended guidance will require both operating and finance leases to be recognized in the balance sheet. Additionally, the amended guidance aligns lessor accounting to comparable guidance in ASCAccounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.Customers ("ASC 606"). The amended guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in thisIn July 2018, the FASB issued ASU should2018-11, Leases: Targeted Improvements, allowing ASU 2016-02 to be adopted using either 1) a modified retrospective transition approach, which requires application of the new guidance at the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the year of adoption; or 2) application of the new standard at the January 1, 2019 adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. Early adoption is permitted. We do not intend to early adopt this ASU. To assess the impacts of the new lease standard on our financial statements and current accounting practices, we have formed a steering committee comprised of subject matter experts within the Company to assist with the assessment of contractual arrangements that may qualify as a lease under the new standard, gather lease data, assist with evaluating and implementing lease management technology solutions, and other key activities. At this time, we have finalized our selection of a software vendor and are in the process of implementing a lease management technology solution. We anticipate the impact of this standard to be significant to our Consolidated Balance Sheet due to the amount of our lease commitments. See Note 1718 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained in our 20162017 Annual Report on Form 10-K for further information regarding these commitments. We are currently evaluating the other impacts that ASU 2016-02 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
Effective in 2020
ASU No. 2017-04 — In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles — Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The new guidance simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by removing the second step of the two-step impairment test. The amendment requires an entity to perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds a reporting unit’s fair value. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary. For public companies, this guidance is effective for annual periods or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and should be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for interim or annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. We do not intend to early adopt this ASU. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-04 to have a material impact on our financial statements.

2.2. Revenue Recognition
Disaggregation of Net Sales
The following table presents a disaggregation of our net sales by product type and revenue source. We believe these categories most appropriately depict the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with our customers.
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
 June 30, 2018 June 30, 2017(1) June 30, 2018 June 30, 2017(1)
 (In thousands)
Fluid milk$1,157,288
 $1,266,688
 $2,417,222
 $2,683,344
Ice cream(2)321,005
 324,955
 560,603
 580,339
Fresh cream(3)99,816
 92,911
 191,766
 180,782
Extended shelf life and other dairy products(4)46,183
 46,578
 91,425
 94,716
Cultured65,504
 72,111
 129,670
 144,185
Other beverages(5)66,700
 72,100
 137,044
 147,034
Other(6)30,794
 27,795
 63,098
 55,019
Subtotal1,787,290
 1,903,138
 3,590,828
 3,885,419
Sales of excess raw materials(7)122,880
 
 274,682
 
Sales of other bulk commodities41,060
 23,584
 66,227
 36,989
Total net sales$1,951,230
 $1,926,722
 $3,931,737
 $3,922,408
(1)Prior period amounts have not been restated as we have elected to adopt ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method. Sales of excess raw materials of $137.2 million and $308.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively, were included as a reduction of cost of sales in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(2)Includes ice cream, ice cream mix and ice cream novelties.
(3)Includes half-and-half and whipping creams.
(4)Includes creamers and other extended shelf life fluids.
(5)Includes fruit juice, fruit flavored drinks, iced tea and water.
(6)Includes items for resale such as butter, cheese, eggs and milkshakes.
(7)Historically, we presented sales of excess raw materials as a reduction of cost of sales within our Consolidated Statements of Operations; however, upon further evaluation of these sales in connection with our implementation of ASC 606, we have determined that it is appropriate to present these sales as revenue. Therefore, on a prospective basis, effective January 1, 2018, we began reporting these sales within the net sales line of our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.


The following table presents a disaggregation of our net product sales between sales of Company-branded products versus sales of private label products:
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
 June 30, 2018 June 30, 2017 June 30, 2018 June 30, 2017
 (In thousands)
Branded products$871,269
 $926,351
 $1,763,395
 $1,907,596
Private label products916,021
 976,787
 1,827,433
 1,977,823
Subtotal1,787,290
 1,903,138
 3,590,828
 3,885,419
Sales of excess raw materials122,880
 
 274,682
 
Sales of other bulk commodities41,060
 23,584
 66,227
 36,989
Total net sales$1,951,230
 $1,926,722
 $3,931,737
 $3,922,408
Revenue Recognition and Nature of Products and Services
We manufacture, market and distribute a wide variety of branded and private label dairy and dairy case products, including fluid milk, ice cream, cultured dairy products, creamers, ice cream mix and other dairy products to retailers, distributors, foodservice outlets, educational institutions and governmental entities across the United States. Revenue is recognized upon transfer of control of promised goods or services to our customers’ facility in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to ultimately receive in exchange for those promised goods or services. Revenue is recognized net of allowances for product returns, trade promotions and prompt pay and other discounts.
The substantial majority of our revenue is derived from the sale of fluid milk, ice cream and other dairy products, which includes sales of both Company-branded products as well as private label products. In addition, we derive revenue from the sale of excess raw materials and the sale of other bulk commodities.
Our portfolio of products includes fluid milk, ice cream, cultured dairy products, creamers, ice cream mix and other dairy and dairy case products. We sell these products under national, regional and local proprietary or licensed brands, or under private labels. Our sales of excess raw materials consist primarily of bulk cream sales. As a result of the purchase of raw milk, we obtain more butterfat than is needed in our production process. Excess butterfat is sold, primarily in the form of bulk cream, to third parties. Additionally, in certain cases we may be required to externally purchase bulk cream in order to fulfill minimum supply requirements for our customers. In these cases, we purchase bulk cream from other processors or suppliers and resell it to our customers to fulfill our contractual requirements with them.
In all cases, we recognize revenue upon delivery to our customers as we have determined that this is the point at which control is transferred, our performance obligation is complete, and we are entitled to consideration.
Contractual Arrangements with Customers
The majority of our sales are to retailers, warehouse clubs, distributors, foodservice outlets, educational institutions and governmental entities with whom we have contractual agreements. Our sales of excess raw materials and other bulk commodities are primarily to dairy cooperatives, dairy processors or other manufacturers for use as a raw ingredient in their respective manufacturing processes. Our customer contracts typically contain standard terms and conditions and a term sheet. In some cases, upon expiration, these arrangements may continue with the same terms and may not be formally renewed. Additionally, we have a number of informal sales arrangements with certain local and regional customers, which we consider to be contracts based on the criteria outlined in ASC 606. Payment terms and conditions vary by customer, but we generally provide credit terms to customers ranging up to 30 days; therefore, we have determined that our contracts do not include a significant financing component. We perform ongoing credit evaluations of our customers and maintain allowances for potential credit losses based on our historical experience.
We have determined that we satisfy our performance obligations related to our customer contracts at a point in time, as opposed to over time, and, accordingly, revenue is recognized at a point in time across all of our revenue streams. Therefore, we do not have any contract balances with our customers recorded on our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Sales Incentives and Other Promotional Programs
We routinely offer sales incentives and discounts through various regional and national programs to our customers and consumers. These programs include scan backs, product rebates, product returns, trade promotions and co-op advertising, product discounts, product coupons and amounts paid to customers for shelf space in retail stores. The expenses associated with these programs are accounted for as reductions to the transaction price of our products and are therefore recorded as reductions to gross sales.
Some of our sales incentives are recorded by estimating incentive costs or redemption rates based on our historical experience and expected levels of performance of the trade promotion or other program. We maintain liabilities at the end of each period for the estimated incentive costs incurred but unpaid for these programs. Differences between estimated and actual incentive costs are normally not material and are recognized in earnings in the period such differences are determined.
3. Acquisitions and InvestmentsDiscontinued Operations
Acquisitions
Good Karma — On May 4, 2017, we acquired a non-controlling interest in, Unconsolidated Affiliatesand entered into a distribution agreement with, Good Karma Foods, Inc. (“Good Karma”), the leading producer of flax-based milk and yogurt products. This investment allows us to diversify our portfolio to include plant-based dairy alternatives and provides Good Karma the ability to more rapidly expand distribution across the U.S., as well as increase investments in brand building and product innovation.
AcquisitionsOn June 29, 2018, we increased our ownership interest in Good Karma to 67% with an additional investment of $15.0 million, resulting in control under acquisition method accounting. The acquisition was accounted for as a step-acquisition within a business combination. Our equity interest in Good Karma was remeasured to fair value of $9.0 million, resulting in a non-taxable gain of $2.3 million which was recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2018 and is included in other operating income in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The aggregate fair value purchase price was $35.7 million. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition have been recorded at their fair values and include identifiable intangible assets of $13.6 million, of which $10.7 million relates to an indefinite-lived trademark and $2.9 million relates to customer relationships that are subject to amortization over a period of 10 years.
We recorded goodwill of $23.3 million in connection with the acquisition, which consists of the excess of the net purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired. This goodwill represents the expected value attributable to our expansion into the plant-based dairy alternatives category. The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. We recorded the fair value of the non-controlling interest in Good Karma of $11.8 million in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The acquisition was funded through cash on hand. The pro forma impact of the acquisition on consolidated net earnings would not have materially changed reported net earnings. Good Karma’s results of operations will be consolidated in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition.
Prior to the June 29, 2018 step-acquisition, we accounted for our investment in Good Karma under the equity method of accounting based upon our ability to exercise significant influence over the investee through our ownership interest and representation on Good Karma's board of directors. Our equity in the earnings of this investment was not material to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.


Uncle Matt's Organic On June 22, 2017, we completed the acquisition of Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc. ("Uncle Matt's"). Uncle Matt's is a leading organic juice company offering a wide range of organic juices, including probiotic-infused juices and fruit-infused waters. The total purchase price was $22.0 million. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition have been recorded at their fair values and include identifiable intangible assets of $8.4 million, of which $6.6 million relates to an indefinite-lived trademark and $1.8 million relates to customer relationships that are subject to amortization over a period of 10 years.
We recorded goodwill of $13.4$13.3 million in connection with the acquisition, which consists of the excess of the net purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired. This goodwill represents the expected value attributable to our expansion into the organic juice category. The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.
The acquisition was funded through a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under our receivables securitization facility. The values reflected above may change as we finalize our assessment of the acquired assets and liabilities. A change in these valuations may also impact the income tax related accounts and goodwill. The pro forma impact of the acquisition on consolidated net earnings would not have materially changed reported net earnings. Uncle Matt's results of operations will be included in our Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition.
Friendly's On June 20, 2016, we completed the acquisition of Friendly’s Ice Cream Holdings Corp. (“Friendly’s Holdings”), including its wholly-owned subsidiary, Friendly’s Manufacturing and Retail, LLC (“Friendly’s Manufacturing,” and together with Friendly’s Holdings, “Friendly’s”), the Friendly’s® trademark and all intellectual property associated with the ice cream business. Friendly’s develops, produces, manufactures, markets, distributes and sells ice cream and other frozen dessert-related products, as well as toppings. The total purchase price was $158.2 million. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in connection with the acquisition have been recorded at their fair values and include identifiable intangible assets of $81.7 million, of which $29.7 million relates to customer relationships that are subject to amortization over a period of 15 years. Additionally, we assumed an unfavorable lease contract with a fair value of $5.4 million, which will be amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the term of the lease agreement.
We recorded goodwill of $67.3 million in connection with the acquisition, which consists of the excess of the net purchase price over the fair value of the net assets acquired. This goodwill represents the expected value attributable to an anticipated increased competitive position in the ice cream market in the Northeastern United States. The goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes.
The acquisition was funded through a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility and receivables securitization facility. Friendly's results of operations have been included in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition. The purchase accounting and
Discontinued Operations
During the final fair value assessments are complete.second quarter of 2018, we recognized a net gain from discontinued operations of $1.9 million, net of tax, resulting from a tax refund received from the settlement of a state tax refund claim related to our 2013 sale of Morningstar Foods, LLC.
Investment
4. Investments in Unconsolidated AffiliateAffiliates
Good KarmaOrganic Valley Fresh Joint Venture On May 4,In the third quarter of 2017, we acquired a non-controlling interest in, and entered into a distribution agreementcommenced the operations of our previously announced 50/50 strategic joint venture with Good Karma Foods, Inc.Cooperative Regions of Organic Producer Pools (“Good Karma”CROPP”), the leading producer of flax-basedan independent farmer cooperative that distributes organic milk and yogurt products. This investment allows usother organic dairy products under the Organic Valley® brand. The joint venture, called Organic Valley Fresh, combines our processing plants and refrigerated DSD system with CROPP's portfolio of recognized brands and products, marketing expertise, and access to diversify our portfolioan organic milk supply from America's largest cooperative of organic dairy farmers to include plant-based dairy alternativesbring the Organic Valley® brand to retailers. We and provides Good KarmaCROPP each made a capital contribution of $2.0 million to the ability to more rapidly expand distribution acrossjoint venture during the U.S., as well as increase investments in brand building and product innovation. third quarter of 2017.
We have concluded that Organic Valley Fresh is a variable interest entity, but we have determined that we are not the primary beneficiary of the Organic Valley Fresh joint venture because we do not expecthave the power to direct the activities that most significantly affect the economic performance of the joint venture; therefore, the financial results of the joint venture have not been consolidated in our equity in the earnings of this investment to materially impact our consolidated financial statements.unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. We are accounting for this investment under the equity method of accounting based uponaccounting. Our equity in the earnings of the joint venture are included as a component of operating income as we have determined that the joint venture's operations are integral to, and an extension of, our ability to exercise significant influence overbusiness operations. Our equity in the investee through our ownership interestearnings of the joint venture was $1.7 million and representation on Good Karma's board$3.6 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. We received cash distributions from the joint venture of directors.$2.8 million for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.
35. Inventories
Inventories at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 consisted of the following:
June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Raw materials and supplies$110,616
 $110,095
$105,801
 $106,814
Finished goods176,606
 174,389
170,855
 171,249
Total$287,222
 $284,484
$276,656
 $278,063

46. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
As of June 30, 2017,2018, the gross carrying value of goodwill was $2.24$2.26 billion and accumulated goodwill impairment was $2.08 billion. We recorded a goodwill impairment charge of $2.08 billion in 2011 with no goodwill impairment charges in subsequent years.

The changes in the net carrying amounts of goodwill as of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were as follows (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2016$154,112
Acquisitions (Note 2)13,423
Balance at June 30, 2017$167,535
Balance at December 31, 2017$167,535
Acquisitions(1)23,172
Balance at June 30, 2018$190,707
(1)The increase in the net carrying amount of goodwill from December 31, 2017 to June 30, 2018 is related to the Good Karma acquisition and the finalization of tax matters associated with the Uncle Matt's acquisition. See Note 3.
The net carrying amounts of our intangible assets other than goodwill as of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 were as follows:
June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
Acquisition Costs(1) Impairment 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
 Acquisition Costs Impairment 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
Acquisition Costs(1) Impairment 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
 Acquisition Costs Impairment 
Accumulated
Amortization
 
Net
Carrying
Amount
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Intangible assets with indefinite lives:                              
Trademarks$58,600
 $
 $
 $58,600
 $52,000
 $
 $
 $52,000
$69,315
 $
 $
 $69,315
 $58,600
 $
 $
 $58,600
Intangible assets with finite lives:                              
Customer-related and other80,685
 
 (39,211) 41,474
 78,925
 
 (37,050) 41,875
83,545
 
 (43,339) 40,206
 80,685
 
 (41,398) 39,287
Trademarks230,709
 (109,910) (49,973) 70,826
 229,777
 (109,910) (41,824) 78,043
230,709
 (109,910) (66,405) 54,394
 230,709
 (109,910) (58,189) 62,610
Total$369,994
 $(109,910) $(89,184) $170,900
 $360,702
 $(109,910) $(78,874) $171,918
$383,569
 $(109,910) $(109,744) $163,915
 $369,994
 $(109,910) $(99,587) $160,497
(1)The increase in the carrying amount of intangible assets from December 31, 20162017 to June 30, 20172018 is related in part to an indefinite-lived trademark of $6.6$10.7 million and a finite-lived customer-related intangible of $1.8$2.9 million we recorded as a part of the Uncle Matt'sGood Karma acquisition. See Note 2. Additionally, we acquired a finite-lived trademark of a regional artisan ice cream brand for $0.9 million during the period.3.
Our trademark valuesfinite-lived trademarks will be amortized on a straight-line basis over their remaining useful lives, which range from approximately 32 to 98 years, with a weighted-average remaining useful life of approximately 5 years. Amortization expense on intangible assets for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and 2016 was $5.2$5.1 million and $4.1$5.2 million, respectively. Amortization expense on intangible assets for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 and 2016 was $10.3$10.2 million and $10.4$10.3 million, respectively. The amortization of intangible assets is reported on a separate line item in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Estimated aggregate intangible asset amortization expense for the next five years is as follows (in millions):
2017$20.7
201820.3
$20.5
201920.3
20.6
202012.2
12.5
202110.5
10.8
20228.1

57. Debt
Our long-term debt as of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 20162017 consisted of the following:
June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 
Amount 
Interest
Rate
 Amount 
Interest
Rate
 Amount 
Interest
Rate
 Amount 
Interest
Rate
 
(In thousands, except percentages) (In thousands, except percentages) 
Dean Foods Company debt obligations:        
Senior secured revolving credit facility$1,300
 3.06% * $9,100
 2.94% *$
 % $11,200
 3.33% *
Senior notes due 2023700,000
 6.50 700,000
 6.50 700,000
 6.50 700,000
 6.50 
701,300
 709,100
 700,000
 711,200
 
Subsidiary debt obligations:        
Senior notes due 2017142,000
 6.90 142,000
 6.90 
Receivables securitization facility65,000
 2.18* 40,000
 1.87*160,000
 3.07* 205,000
 2.48*
Capital lease and other3,148
  3,980
  2,082
  2,671
  
210,148
 185,980
 162,082
 207,671
 
Subtotal911,448
 895,080
 862,082
 918,871
 
Unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs(7,150) (9,029) 
Unamortized debt issuance costs(5,123) (5,672) 
Total debt904,298
 886,051
 856,959
 913,199
 
Less current portion(142,173) (140,806) (1,150) (1,125) 
Total long-term portion$762,125
 $745,245
 $855,809
 $912,074
 
*    Represents a weighted average rate, including applicable interest rate margins.
The scheduled debt maturities at June 30, 20172018 were as follows (in thousands):
2017$142,457
20181,125
$516
20191,174
1,174
202065,392
160,392
2021

2022
Thereafter701,300
700,000
Subtotal911,448
862,082
Less unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs(7,150)
Less unamortized debt issuance costs(5,123)
Total debt$904,298
$856,959
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility — In March 2015, we entered into a credit agreement, as amended on January 4, 2017 and as described below (as amended, the "Credit Agreement"), pursuant to which the lenders provided us with a senior secured revolving credit facility in the amount of up to $450 million (the “Credit Facility”). Under the Credit Agreement, we have the right to request an increase of the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility by up to $200 million, which we may request to be made available as either term loans or revolving loans, without the consent of any lenders not participating in such increase, subject to specified conditions. The Credit Facility is available for the issuance of up to $75 million of letters of credit and up to $100 million of swing line loans.
On January 4, 2017, we amended the Credit Agreement to, among other things, (i) extend the maturity date of the Credit Facility to January 4, 2022; (ii) modify the leverage ratio covenant to add a requirement that we comply with a maximum total net leverage ratio (which, for purposes of calculating indebtedness, excludes borrowings under our receivables securitization facility) not to exceed 4.25 to 1.00 and to eliminate the maximum senior secured net leverage ratio requirement; (iii) modify the definition of “Consolidated EBITDA” to permit certain pro forma cost savings add-backs in connection with permitted acquisitions and dispositions; (iv) modify the definition of “Applicable Rate” to reduce the interest rate margins such that loans outstanding under the Credit Facility will bear interest, at our option, at either (x) the LIBO Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus a

margin of between 1.75% and 2.50% (2.00% as of June 30, 2017)2018) based on our total net leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement), or (y) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus a margin of between 0.75% and 1.50% (1.00%

(1.00% as of June 30, 2017)2018) based on our total net leverage ratio; (v) modify certain negative covenants to provide additional flexibility for the incurrence of debt, the payment of dividends and the making of certain permitted acquisitions and other investments; (vi) eliminate and release all real property as collateral for loans under the Credit Facility; and (vii) provide the Company the ability to request that increases in the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility be made available as either revolving loans or term loans.
In connection with the execution of the amendment to the Credit Agreement, we paid certain arrangement fees of approximately $0.7 million to lenders and other fees of approximately $0.3 million, which were capitalized and will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the facility. Additionally, we wrote off $0.9 million of unamortized deferred financing costs in connection with this amendment.
We may make optional prepayments of loans under the Credit Facility, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty (other than applicable breakage costs). Subject to certain exceptions and conditions described in the Credit Agreement, we will be obligated to prepay the Credit Facility, but without a corresponding commitment reduction, with the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales and with casualty insurance proceeds. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by our existing and future domestic material restricted subsidiaries (as defined in the Credit Agreement), which are substantially all of our wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries other than the receivables securitization facility subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”).
The Credit Facility is secured by a first priority perfected security interest in substantially all of our assets and the assets of the Guarantors, whether consisting of personal, tangible or intangible property, including a pledge of, and a perfected security interest in, (i) all of the shares of capital stock of the Guarantors and (ii) 65% of the shares of capital stock of our and the Guarantors' first-tier foreign subsidiaries that are material restricted subsidiaries, in each case subject to certain exceptions as set forth in the Credit Agreement. The collateral does not include, among other things, (a) any of our real property, (b) the capital stock and any assets of any unrestricted subsidiary, (c) any capital stock of any direct or indirect subsidiary of Dean Holding Company ("Legacy Dean"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, which owns any real property, or (d) receivables sold pursuant to the receivables securitization facility.
 The Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including, but not limited to specified restrictions on indebtedness, liens, guarantee obligations, mergers, acquisitions, consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions, sales of assets, leases, payment of dividends and other restricted payments during a default or non-compliance with the financial covenants, investments, loans and advances, transactions with affiliates and sale and leaseback transactions. The Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default and related cure provisions. We are required to comply with (a) a maximum total net leverage ratio of 4.25x (which, for purposes of calculating indebtedness, excludes borrowings under our receivables securitization facility); and (b) a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of 2.25x. In addition, the Credit Agreement imposes certain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and make other restricted payments if our total net leverage ratio (including borrowings under our receivables securitization facility) is in excess of 3.50x.
At June 30, 2017,2018, we had no outstanding borrowings of $1.3 million under the Credit Facility. Our average daily balance under the Credit Facility during the six months ended June 30, 20172018, was $1.7$2.6 million. There were no letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility as of June 30, 2017.2018.
Dean Foods Receivables Securitization Facility — We have a $450 million receivables securitization facility pursuant to which certain of our subsidiaries sell their accounts receivable to two wholly-owned entities intended to be bankruptcy-remote. The entities then transfer the receivables to third-party asset-backed commercial paper conduits sponsored by major financial institutions. The assets and liabilities of these two entities are fully reflected in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the securitization is treated as a borrowing for accounting purposes.
On January 4, 2017, we amended the purchase agreement governing the receivables securitization facility to, among other things, (i) extend the liquidity termination date to January 4, 2020, (ii) reduce the maximum size of the receivables securitization facility to $450 million, (iii) replace the senior secured net leverage ratio with a total net leverage ratio to be consistent with the amended leverage ratio covenant under the amended Credit Agreement described above, and (iv) modify certain pricing terms such that advances outstanding under the receivables securitization facility will bear interest between 0.90% and 1.05%, and the Company will pay an unused fee between 0.40% and 0.55% on undrawn amounts, in each case based on the Company's total net leverage ratio.
In connection with the amendment to the receivables purchase agreement, we paid certain arrangement fees of approximately $0.6 million to lenders and other fees of approximately $0.1 million, which were capitalized and will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the facility. Additionally, we wrote off $0.2 million of unamortized deferred financing costs in connection with the amendment.

The receivables purchase agreement contains covenants consistent with those contained in the Credit Agreement.

Based on the monthly borrowing base formula, we had the ability to borrow up to $448.4$435.7 million of the total commitment amount under the receivables securitization facility as of June 30, 2017.2018. The total amount of receivables sold to these entities as of June 30, 20172018 was $561.5$557.8 million. During the first six months of 2017,2018, we borrowed $1.1$1.2 billion and repaid $1.1$1.3 billion under the facility with a remaining balance of $65.0$160.0 million as of June 30, 2017.2018. In addition to letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $117.2$108.7 million that were issued but undrawn, the remaining available borrowing capacity was $266.2$167.0 million at June 30, 2017.2018. Our average daily balance under this facility during the six months ended June 30, 20172018 was $44.2$168.8 million. The receivables securitization facility bears interest at a variable rate based upon commercial paper and one-month LIBO rates plus an applicable margin based on our total net leverage ratio.
Dean Foods Company Senior Notes due 2023 — On February 25, 2015, we issued $700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% senior notes due 2023 (the “2023 Notes”) at an issue price of 100% of the principal amount of the 2023 Notes in a private placement for resale to “qualified institutional buyers” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and in offshore transactions pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act.
In connection with the issuance of the 2023 Notes, we paid certain arrangement fees of approximately $7.0 million to initial purchasers and other fees of approximately $1.8 million, which were deferred and netted against the outstanding debt balance, and will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the 2023 Notes.
The 2023 Notes are our senior unsecured obligations. Accordingly, the 2023 Notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future senior obligations and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to all of our existing and future secured obligations, including obligations under our Credit Facility and receivables securitization facility, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such obligations. The 2023 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis, jointly and severally, by our subsidiaries that guarantee obligations under the Credit Facility.
The 2023 Notes will mature on March 15, 2023, and bear interest at an annual rate of 6.50%. Interest on the 2023 Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears in March and September of each year.
We may, at our option, redeem all or a portion of the 2023 Notes at any time on or after March 15, 2018, at the applicable redemption prices specified in the indenture governing the 2023 Notes (the "Indenture"), plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date. We are also entitled to redeem up to 40% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes before March 15, 2018 with the net cash proceeds that we receive from certain equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 106.5% of the principal amount of the 2023 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date. In addition, prior to March 15, 2018, we may redeem all or a portion of the 2023 Notes, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus a “make-whole” premium and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date.
If we undergo certain kinds of changes of control, holders of the 2023 Notes have the right to require us to repurchase all or any portion of such holder’s 2023 Notes at 101% of the principal amount of the notes being repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of repurchase.
The Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to: (i) create certain liens; (ii) enter into sale and lease-back transactions; (iii) assume, incur or guarantee indebtedness for borrowed money that is secured by a lien on certain principal properties (or on any shares of capital stock of our subsidiaries that own such principal properties) without securing the 2023 Notes on a pari passu basis; and (iv) consolidate with or merge with or into, or sell, transfer, convey or lease all or substantially all of our properties and assets, taken as a whole, to another person.
The carrying value under the 2023 Notes at June 30, 20172018 was $693.8$694.9 million, net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $6.2$5.1 million.
Subsidiary Senior Notes due 2017 — Legacy Dean had certain senior notes outstanding at the time of its acquisition, of which one series remains outstanding ($142 million aggregate principal amount)and matures on October 15, 2017. The carrying value under these notes at June 30, 2017 was $141.1 million, net of unamortized discounts of $0.9 million, at 6.90% interest. The indenture governing the Legacy Dean senior notes does not contain financial covenants but does contain certain restrictions, including a prohibition against Legacy Dean and its subsidiaries granting liens on certain of their real property interests and a prohibition against Legacy Dean granting liens on the stock of its subsidiaries. The Legacy Dean senior notes are not guaranteed by Dean Foods Company or Legacy Dean’s wholly-owned subsidiaries.
See Note 68 for information regarding the fair value of the 2023 Notes and the subsidiary senior notes due 2017 as of June 30, 2017.2018.

Capital Lease Obligations and Other — Capital lease obligations of $3.1$2.1 million and $4.0$2.7 million as of June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, respectively, were primarily comprised of our leases for information technology equipment.
68. Derivative Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
Derivative Financial Instruments
Commodities — We are exposed to commodity price fluctuations, including in the prices of milk, butterfat, sweeteners and other commodities used in the manufacturing, packaging and distribution of our products, such as natural gas, resin and diesel fuel. To secure adequate supplies of materials and bring greater stability to the cost of ingredients and their related manufacturing, packaging and distribution, we routinely enter into forward purchase contracts and other purchase arrangements with suppliers. Under the forward purchase contracts, we commit to purchasing agreed-upon quantities of ingredients and commodities at agreed-upon prices at specified future dates. The outstanding purchase commitment for these commodities at any point in time typically ranges from one month’s to one year’s anticipated requirements, depending on the ingredient or commodity. These contracts are considered normal purchases.

In addition to entering into forward purchase contracts, from time to time we may purchase over-the-counter contracts from qualified financial institutions or enter into exchange-traded commodity futures contracts for raw materials that are ingredients of our products or components of such ingredients. All commodities contracts are marked to market in our income statement at each reporting period and a derivative asset or liability is recorded on our balance sheet.
Although we may utilize forward purchase contracts and other instruments to mitigate the risks related to commodity price fluctuation, such strategies do not fully mitigate commodity price risk. Adverse movements in commodity prices over the terms of the contracts or instruments could decrease the economic benefits we derive from these strategies. At June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016,2017, our derivatives recorded at fair value in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets consisted of the following:
Derivative Assets Derivative LiabilitiesDerivative Assets Derivative Liabilities
June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017 June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Commodities contracts — current(1)$6,945
 $2,416
 $2,037
 $12
$2,226
 $1,431
 $1,450
 $1,829
Commodities contracts — non-current(2)1
 
 10
 
2
 
 
 15
Total derivatives$6,946
 $2,416
 $2,047
 $12
$2,228
 $1,431
 $1,450
 $1,844
(1)Derivative assets and liabilities that have settlement dates equal to or less than 12 months from the respective balance sheet date are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and accounts payable and accrued expenses, respectively, in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(2)Derivative assets and liabilities that have settlement dates greater than 12 months from the respective balance sheet date are included in identifiable intangible and other assets, net and other long-term liabilities, respectively, in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering assumptions, we follow a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1 — Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.
Level 2 — Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations, in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

A summary of our derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 20172018 is as follows (in thousands):
Fair Value as of June 30, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Fair Value as of June 30, 2018 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Asset — Commodities contracts$6,946
 $
 $6,946
 $
$2,228
 $
 $2,228
 $
Liability — Commodities contracts2,047
 
 2,047
 
1,450
 
 1,450
 
A summary of our derivative assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20162017 is as follows (in thousands):
Fair Value as of December 31, 2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Fair Value as of December 31, 2017 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Asset — Commodities contracts$2,416
 $
 $2,416
 $
$1,431
 $
 $1,431
 $
Liability — Commodities contracts12
 
 12
 
1,844
 
 1,844
 


Due to their near-term maturities, the carrying amounts of accounts receivable and accounts payable are considered equivalent to fair value. In addition, because the interest rates on our Credit Facility, receivables securitization facility, and certain other debt are variable, their fair values approximate their carrying values.
The fair valuesvalue of the 2023 Notes and subsidiary senior notes werewas determined based on quoted market prices obtained through an external pricing source which derives its price valuations from daily marketplace transactions, with adjustments to reflect the spreads of benchmark bonds, credit risk and certain other variables. We have determined these fair values to be Level 2 measurements as all significant inputs into the quotes provided by our pricing source are observable in active markets. The following table presents the outstanding principal amountsamount and fair valuesvalue of the 2023 Notes and subsidiary senior notes at June 30, 20172018 and December 31, 2016:2017:
 June 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
 Amount Outstanding Fair Value Amount Outstanding Fair Value
 (In thousands)
Dean Foods Company senior notes due 2023$700,000
 $736,750
 $700,000
 $736,750
Subsidiary senior notes due 2017142,000
 143,775
 142,000
 146,615
 June 30, 2018 December 31, 2017
 Amount Outstanding Fair Value Amount Outstanding Fair Value
 (In thousands)
Dean Foods Company senior notes due 2023$700,000
 $672,000
 $700,000
 $698,250
Additionally, we maintain a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (“SERP”), which is a nonqualified deferred compensation arrangement for our executive officers and other employees earning compensation in excess of the maximum compensation that can be taken into account with respect to our 401(k) plan. The SERP is designed to provide these employees with retirement benefits from us that are equivalent, as a percentage of total compensation, to the benefits provided to other employees. The assets related to the SERP are primarily invested in money market and mutual funds and are held at fair value. We classify these assets as Level 2 as fair value can be corroborated based on quoted market prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active. The following table presents a summary of the SERP assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 20172018 (in thousands):
Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Money market$24
 $
 $24
 $
$19
 $
 $19
 $
Mutual funds1,754
 
 1,754
 
1,754
 
 1,754
 

The following table presents a summary of the SERP assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 20162017 (in thousands):
Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Money market$27
 $
 $27
 $
$22
 $
 $22
 $
Mutual funds1,673
 
 1,673
 
1,785
 
 1,785
 

79. Common Stock and Share-Based Compensation
Our authorized shares of capital stock include one million shares of preferred stock and 250 million shares of common stock with a par value of $0.01 per share.
Cash Dividends — In November 2013, we announced thataccordance with our Board of Directors had adopted a cash dividend policy. Under the policy, holders of our common stock will receive dividends when and as declared by our Board of Directors. Beginning in 2015, all awards of restricted stock units, performance stock units and phantom shares provide for cash dividend equivalent units, which vest in cash at the same time as the underlying award. Quarterly dividends of $0.09 per share were paid in March and June of 20172018 and 2016,2017, totaling approximately $16.4 million and $16.5 million for each of the first six months of 20172018 and 2016, respectively.2017. We expect to pay quarterly dividends of $0.09 per share ($0.36 per share annually) for the remainder of 2017.2018. Our cash dividend policy is subject to modification, suspension or cancellation in any manner and at any time. Dividends are presented as a reduction to retained earnings in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity unless we have an accumulated deficit as of the end of the period, in which case they are reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital.
Stock Repurchase Program — Since 1998, our Board of Directors has from time to time authorized the repurchase of our common stock up to an aggregate of $2.38 billion, excluding fees and commissions. We made no share repurchases during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017. We repurchased 1,371,185 shares for $25.0 million during the three2018 and six months ended June 30, 2016.2017. As of June 30, 2017,2018, $197.1 million remained available for repurchases under this program (excluding fees and commissions). Our management is authorized to purchase shares from time to time through open market transactions at prevailing prices or in privately-negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions and other factors. Shares, when repurchased, are retired.

Restricted Stock Units — We issue restricted stock units ("RSUs") to certain senior employees and non-employee directors as part of our long-term incentive compensation program. An RSU represents the right to receive one share of common stock in the future. RSUs have no exercise price. RSUs granted to employees generally vest ratably over three years, subject to certain accelerated vesting provisions based primarily on a change of control, or in certain cases upon death or qualified disability. RSUs granted to non-employee directors vest ratably over three years.
The following table summarizes RSU activity during the six months ended June 30, 2017:2018:
Employees Non-Employee Directors TotalEmployees Non-Employee Directors Total
RSUs outstanding at January 1, 2017872,785
 80,207
 952,992
RSUs outstanding at January 1, 2018545,405
 85,829
 631,234
RSUs granted395,097
 45,528
 440,625
717,744
 95,669
 813,413
Shares issued upon vesting of RSUs(221,992) (37,204) (259,196)(166,389) (38,454) (204,843)
RSUs canceled or forfeited(1)(296,696) (2,112) (298,808)(164,033) (1,915) (165,948)
RSUs outstanding at June 30, 2017749,194
 86,419
 835,613
RSUs outstanding at June 30, 2018932,727
 141,129
 1,073,856
Weighted average grant date fair value$17.91
 $18.46
 $17.97
$11.52
 $11.98
 $11.58
(1)Pursuant to the terms of our plans, employees have the option of forfeiting RSUs to cover their minimum statutory tax withholding when shares are issued. Any RSUs surrendered or canceled in satisfaction of participants’ tax withholding obligations are not available for future grants under the plans.

Performance Stock Units Beginning inIn 2016, we began granting performance sharestock units ("PSUs") were granted as a part of our long-term incentive compensation program. PSUs will cliff vest and be settledsettle in shares of our common stock at the end of a three-year performance period contingent upon the achievement of specific performance goals established for each calendar year during the respective performance periods.period. The PSUs are deemed granted in three separate one year tranches on the dates in which our Compensation Committee establishes the applicable annual performance goals. The number of shares that may be earned at the end of the vesting period may range from zero to 200 percent of the target award amount based on the achievement of the performance goals. The fair value of PSUs is estimated using the market price of our common stock on the date of grant, and we recognize compensation expense ratably over the vesting period for the portion of the awards that are expected to vest. The fair value of the PSUs is remeasured at each reporting period. The following table summarizes PSU activity during the six months ended June 30, 2017:2018:
PSUs Weighted Average Grant Date Fair ValuePSUs Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 201790,583
 $19.13
Outstanding at January 1, 2018121,807
 $18.62
Granted158,402
 18.84
290,609
 8.79
Vested
 

 
Forfeited or canceled(81,217) 19.29
(21,870) 10.98
Outstanding at June 30, 2017167,768
 $18.78
Performance adjustment(1)(85,795) 18.13
Outstanding at June 30, 2018304,751
 $9.93
(1)Represents an adjustment to the 2017 tranche of the 2016 and 2017 PSU awards based on actual performance during the 2017 annual performance period in relation to the established performance goal for that period. The actual performance for the 2017 annual performance period was certified by the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors in the first quarter of 2018.

Phantom Shares — We grant phantom shares as part of our long-term incentive compensation program, which are similar to RSUs in that they are based on the price of our stock and vest ratably over a three-year period, but are cash-settled based upon the value of our stock at each vesting date. The fair value of the awards is remeasured at each reporting period. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period with a corresponding liability, which is recorded in accounts payable and accrued expenses in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table summarizes the phantom share activity during the six months ended June 30, 2017:2018:
Shares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair ValueShares Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 20171,361,062
 $17.78
Outstanding at January 1, 20181,322,580
 $18.26
Granted767,521
 18.47
1,618,179
 8.80
Converted/paid(600,346) 17.00
(595,402) 18.03
Forfeited(140,783) 18.27
(264,215) 13.47
Outstanding at June 30, 20171,387,454
 $18.45
Outstanding at June 30, 20182,081,142
 $11.58
Stock Options — The following table summarizes stock option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2017:2018:
Options 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Life (Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Options 
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
 
Weighted
Average
Contractual
Life (Years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
Options outstanding and exercisable at January 1, 20172,038,829
 $19.78
  
Options outstanding and exercisable at January 1, 2018700,467
 $17.21
  
Forfeited and canceled(557,329) 26.18
  (270,922) 21.00
  
Exercised(49,879) 15.12
  
 
  
Options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 20171,431,621
 $17.45
 1.15 $2,709,128
Options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2018429,545
 $14.81
 1.41 $65,143
We recognize share-based compensation expense for stock options ratably over the vesting period. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes valuation model. We did not grant any stock options during 20162017 or 2017,2018, nor do we currently plan to in the future. At June 30, 2017,2018, there was no remaining unrecognized stock option expense related to unvested awards.

Share-Based Compensation Expense — The following table summarizes the share-based compensation expense recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016:2017:
Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30
2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
RSUs$1,046
 $2,068
 $2,654
 $3,437
$1,399
 $1,046
 $2,545
 $2,654
PSUs(1,051) 451
 (551) 839
551
 (1,051) 1,147
 (551)
Phantom shares2,707
 3,210
 4,556
 7,521
2,520
 2,707
 2,933
 4,556
Total$2,702
 $5,729
 $6,659

$11,797
$4,470
 $2,702
 $6,625

$6,659

810. Earnings (Loss) Per Share
Basic earnings (loss) per share (“EPS”) is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the effect of all dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during each period. Stock option and stock unit conversions were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 as we incurred a loss from continuing operations for these periods and any effect on loss per share would have been anti-dilutive. The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used in the computations of both basic and diluted EPS:
Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30
2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
(In thousands, except share data)(In thousands, except share data)
Basic earnings (loss) per share computation:      
Numerator:      
Income$17,647
 $33,371
 $7,888
 $72,572
Income (loss) from continuing operations$(42,016) $17,647
 $(42,281) $7,888
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interest
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company$(42,016) $17,647
 $(42,281) $7,888
Denominator:              
Average common shares90,882,415
 91,244,745
 90,796,585
 91,406,969
91,342,652
 90,882,415
 91,267,748
 90,796,585
Basic earnings per share$0.19
 $0.37
 $0.09
 $0.79
Basic earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company$(0.46) $0.19
 $(0.46) $0.09
Diluted earnings (loss) per share computation:      
Numerator:      
Income$17,647
 $33,371
 $7,888
 $72,572
Income (loss) from continuing operations$(42,016) $17,647
 $(42,281) $7,888
Net (income) loss attributable to non-controlling interest
 
 
 
Income (loss) from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company$(42,016) $17,647
 $(42,281) $7,888
Denominator:              
Average common shares — basic90,882,415
 91,244,745
 90,796,585
 91,406,969
91,342,652
 90,882,415
 91,267,748
 90,796,585
Stock option conversion(1)220,318
 232,113
 232,495
 258,164

 220,318
 
 232,495
RSUs and PSUs(2)266,297
 202,955
 336,866
 329,945

 266,297
 
 336,866
Average common shares — diluted91,369,030
 91,679,813
 91,365,946
 91,995,078
91,342,652
 91,369,030
 91,267,748
 91,365,946
Diluted earnings per share$0.19
 $0.36
 $0.09
 $0.79
Diluted earnings (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Dean Foods Company$(0.46) $0.19
 $(0.46) $0.09
(1) Anti-dilutive options excluded655,700
 1,282,259
 776,710
 1,349,300
443,169
 655,700
 473,149
 776,710
(2) Anti-dilutive stock units excluded8,959
 5,911
 4,504
 
1,202,367
 8,959
 1,057,057
 4,504

911. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of tax, during the three months ended June 30, 20172018 were as follows (in thousands):
 
Pension and 
Other
Postretirement
Benefits Items
 
Foreign 
Currency
Items
 Total
Balance at March 31, 2017$(83,208) $(4,781) $(87,989)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications3,278
 
 3,278
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income(1)(1,646) 
 (1,646)
Net current-period other comprehensive income1,632
 
 1,632
Balance at June 30, 2017$(81,576) $(4,781) $(86,357)
 
Pension and 
Other
Postretirement
Benefits Items
 
Foreign 
Currency
Items
 Total
Balance at March 31, 2018$(88,852) $(4,781) $(93,633)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications3,210
 
 3,210
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss(1)(1,608) 
 (1,608)
Net current-period other comprehensive income1,602
 
 1,602
Balance at June 30, 2018$(87,250) $(4,781) $(92,031)
(1)
The accumulated other comprehensive loss reclassification is related to amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses and prior service costs, both of which are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 1012.

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of tax, during the three months ended June 30, 20162017 were as follows (in thousands):
 
Pension and 
Other
Postretirement
Benefits Items
 
Foreign 
Currency
Items
 Total
Balance at March 31, 2016$(81,794) $(2,371) $(84,165)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications3,015
 (1,208) 1,807
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income(1)(1,465) 
 (1,465)
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)1,550
 (1,208) 342
Balance at June 30, 2016$(80,244) $(3,579) $(83,823)
 
Pension and 
Other
Postretirement
Benefits Items
 
Foreign 
Currency
Items
 Total
Balance at March 31, 2017$(83,208) $(4,781) $(87,989)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications3,278
 
 3,278
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss(1)(1,646) 
 (1,646)
Net current-period other comprehensive income1,632
 
 1,632
Balance at June 30, 2017$(81,576) $(4,781) $(86,357)
(1)
The accumulated other comprehensive loss reclassification is related to amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses and prior service costs, both of which are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 1012.

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of tax, during the six months ended June 30, 20172018 were as follows (in thousands):
 
Pension and 
Other
Postretirement
Benefits Items
 
Foreign 
Currency
Items
 Total
Balance at December 31, 2016$(84,852) $(4,781) $(89,633)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications6,569
 
 6,569
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income(1)(3,293) 
 (3,293)
Net current-period other comprehensive income3,276
 
 3,276
Balance at June 30, 2017$(81,576) $(4,781) $(86,357)
 
Pension and 
Other
Postretirement
Benefits Items
 
Foreign 
Currency
Items
 Total
Balance at December 31, 2017$(73,629) $(4,781) $(78,410)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications6,443
 
 6,443
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss(1)(3,217) 
 (3,217)
Net current-period other comprehensive income3,226
 
 3,226
Reclassification of stranded tax effects related to the Tax Act(2)(16,847) 
 (16,847)
Balance at June 30, 2018$(87,250) $(4,781) $(92,031)
(1)
The accumulated other comprehensive loss reclassification is related to amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses and prior service costs, both of which are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 1012.
(2)
See Note 1 for additional details on the adoption of ASU No. 2018-02 during the first quarter of 2018.

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component, net of tax, during the six months ended June 30, 20162017 were as follows (in thousands):
 
Pension and 
Other
Postretirement
Benefits Items
 
Foreign 
Currency
Items
 Total
Balance at December 31, 2015$(83,279) $(2,524) $(85,803)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications5,964
 (1,055) 4,909
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income(1)(2,929) 
 (2,929)
Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)3,035
 (1,055) 1,980
Balance at June 30, 2016$(80,244) $(3,579) $(83,823)
 
Pension and 
Other
Postretirement
Benefits Items
 
Foreign 
Currency
Items
 Total
Balance at December 31, 2016$(84,852) $(4,781) $(89,633)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications6,569
 
 6,569
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss(1)(3,293) 
 (3,293)
Net current-period other comprehensive income3,276
 
 3,276
Balance at June 30, 2017$(81,576) $(4,781) $(86,357)
(1)
The accumulated other comprehensive loss reclassification is related to amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses and prior service costs, both of which are included in the computation of net periodic benefit cost. See Note 1012.

1012. Employee Retirement and Postretirement Benefits
We sponsor various defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans, including various employee savings and profit sharing plans, and contribute to various multiemployer pension plans on behalf of our employees. All full-time union and non-union employees who have met requirements pursuant to the plans are eligible to participate in one or more of these plans.
Defined Benefit Plans — The benefits under our defined benefit plans are based on years of service and employee compensation. The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for our defined benefit plans during the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016:2017:
Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30
2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost:              
Service cost$752
 $793
 $1,504
 $1,586
$732
 $752
 $1,464
 $1,504
Interest cost2,927
 3,043
 5,854
 6,086
2,828
 2,927
 5,656
 5,854
Expected return on plan assets(4,758) (4,633) (9,516) (9,266)(4,411) (4,758) (8,822) (9,516)
Amortizations:              
Prior service cost176
 214
 352
 428
108
 176
 216
 352
Unrecognized net loss2,581
 2,206
 5,162
 4,412
2,130
 2,581
 4,260
 5,162
Net periodic benefit cost$1,678
 $1,623
 $3,356
 $3,246
$1,387
 $1,678
 $2,774
 $3,356
On April 3, 2017, we made a discretionary contribution of $38.5 million to our company-sponsored pension plans. We do not expect to contribute an additional $0.8 millionmake any contributions to the company-sponsored pension plans during the remainder of 2017.in 2018.
Postretirement Benefits — Certain of our subsidiaries provide health care benefits to certain retirees who are covered under specific group contracts. The following table sets forth the components of net periodic benefit cost for our postretirement benefit plans during the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016:2017: 
Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30
2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Components of net periodic benefit cost:              
Service cost$146
 $160
 $292
 $320
$170
 $146
 $340
 $292
Interest cost240
 271
 480
 542
235
 240
 470
 480
Amortizations:              
Prior service cost23
 23
 46
 46
23
 23
 46
 46
Unrecognized net gain(114) (61) (228) (122)(118) (114) (236) (228)
Net periodic benefit cost$295
 $393
 $590
 $786
$310
 $295
 $620
 $590
1113. Asset Impairment Charges and Facility Closing and Reorganization Costs
Asset Impairment Charges
We evaluate our finite-lived intangible and long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Indicators of impairment could include, among other factors, significant changes in the business environment, or the planned closure of a facility.facility, or deteriorations in operating cash flows. Considerable management judgment is necessary to evaluate the impact of operating changes and to estimate future cash flows.
Testing the assets for recoverability involves developing estimates of future cash flows directly associated with, and that are expected to arise as a direct result of, the use and eventual disposition of the assets. Other inputs are based on assessment of an individual asset’s alternative use within other production facilities, evaluation of recent market data and historical liquidation sales values for similar assets. As the inputs for testing recoverability are largely based on management’s judgments and are not generally observable in active markets, we consider such measurements to be Level 3 measurements in the fair value hierarchy. See Note 68.

The results of our analysis indicated an impairment to our property, plant and equipment at one of our production facilities of $2.2 million. The impairment was the result of declines in operating cash flows at this facility on both a historical and forecasted basis. This charge was recorded during the three months ended June 30, 2018.
The results of our analysis indicated no impairment of our property, plant and equipment, outside of facility closing and reorganization costs, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. 2017.
We can provide no assurance that we will not have impairment charges in future periods as a result of changes in our business environment, operating results or the assumptions and estimates utilized in our impairment tests.
Facility Closing and Reorganization Costs
Costs associated with approved plans within our ongoing network optimization strategies are summarized as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30
2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Closure of facilities, net(1)$4,203
 $(1,400) $7,689
 $(234)$59,229
 $4,203
 $61,591
 $7,689
Organizational Effectiveness(2)1,614
 
 7,414
 
Organizational effectiveness(2)
 1,614
 (331) 7,414
Enterprise-wide cost productivity plan(3)8,432
 
 14,863
 
Facility closing and reorganization costs, net$5,817
 $(1,400) $15,103
 $(234)$67,661
 $5,817
 $76,123
 $15,103
(1)Reflects charges, net of gains on the sales of assets, associated with closed facilities that were incurred in 20172018 and 2016.2017. These charges are primarily related to facility closures in Braselton, GA; Louisville, KY; Erie, PA; Huntley, IL; Thief River Falls, MN; Lynn, MA; Livonia, MI; Richmond, Virginia; Orem, Utah; New Orleans, Louisiana; Rochester, Indiana; Riverside, California; Delta, Colorado; Denver, Colorado; Springfield, Virginia;and Buena Park, California; and Sheboygan, Wisconsin, as well as other approved closures that have not yet been announced.California. We have incurred net charges to date of $57.5$110.9 million related to these facility closures through June 30, 2017.2018. We expect to incur additional charges related to these facility closures of approximately $6.9$13.2 million related to shutdown, contract termination and other costs. As we continue the evaluation of our supply chain and distribution network, it is likely that we will close additional facilities in the future.
(2)During the first six months of 2017, we embarked oninitiated a company-wide, multi-phase organizational effectiveness initiativeassessment to better align each key function of the Company with our strategic plan. This initiative has resulted in headcount reductions due to changes to our organizational structure, and the charges shown in the table above are primarily comprised of severance benefits and other employee-related costs associated with these organizational changes. We do not expect to incur any material additional costs associated with this initiative.
(3)In the fourth quarter of 2017, we announced an enterprise-wide cost productivity plan, which includes rescaling our supply chain, optimizing spend management and integrating our operating model. This plan has resulted in headcount reductions due to changes to our organizational structure, and the charges shown in the table above are primarily comprised of severance benefits and other employee-related costs associated with these changes. Efforts with respect to our organizational effectiveness initiativethe enterprise-wide cost productivity plan are ongoing, and we expect that we will incur additional costs in the coming months associated with the approval and implementation of additional phases of the plan; however, as specific details of these phases have not been finalized and approved, future costs are not yet estimable.


Activity with respect to facility closing and reorganization costs during the six months ended June 30, 20172018 is summarized below and includes items expensed as incurred:
Accrued Charges at December 31, 2016 Charges and Adjustments Payments Accrued Charges at June 30, 2017Accrued Charges at December 31, 2017 Charges and Adjustments Payments Accrued Charges at June 30, 2018
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Cash charges:              
Workforce reduction costs$3,610
 $7,464
 $(3,572) $7,502
$5,863
 $30,318
 $(5,019) $31,162
Shutdown costs
 2,557
 (2,557) 

 1,833
 (1,833) 
Lease obligations after shutdown3,932
 166
 (814) 3,284
2,606
 48
 (672) 1,982
Other
 163
 (163) 

 190
 (190) 
Subtotal$7,542
 10,350
 $(7,106) $10,786
$8,469
 32,389
 $(7,714) $33,144
Other charges:       
Non-cash charges:       
Write-down of assets(1)  4,678
      44,700
    
Loss on sale of related assets  67
    
Other, net  8
    
Gain on sale/disposal of related assets  (966)    
Subtotal  4,753
      43,734
    
Total  $15,103
      $76,123
    
(1)The write-down of assets relates primarily to owned buildings, land and equipment of those facilities identified for closure. The assets were tested for recoverability at the time the decision to close the facilities was more likely than not to occur. Over time, refinements to our estimates used in testing for recoverability may result in additional asset write-downs. The write-down of assets can include accelerated depreciation recorded for those facilities identified for closure. Our methodology for testing the recoverability of the assets is consistent with the methodology described in the “Asset Impairment Charges” section above.
1214. Commitments and Contingencies
Contingent Obligations Related to Divested Operations — We have divested certain businesses in recent years. In each case, we have retained certain known contingent obligations related to those businesses and/or assumed an obligation to indemnify the purchasers of the businesses for certain unknown contingent liabilities, including environmental liabilities. We believe that we have established adequate reserves, which are immaterial to the financial statements, for potential liabilities and indemnifications related to our divested businesses. Moreover, we do not expect any liability that we may have for these retained liabilities, or any indemnification liability, to materially exceed amounts accrued.
Contingent Obligations Related to Milk Supply Arrangements — On December 21, 2001, in connection with our acquisition of Legacy Dean, we purchased Dairy Farmers of America’s (“DFA”) 33.8% interest in our operations. In connection with that transaction, we issued a contingent, subordinated promissory note to DFA in the original principal amount of $40 million. The promissory note has a 20-year term that bears interest based on the consumer price index. Interest will not be paid in cash but will be added to the principal amount of the note annually, up to a maximum principal amount of $96 million. We may prepay the note in whole or in part at any time, without penalty. The note will become payable only if we materially breach or terminate one of our related milk supply agreements with DFA without renewal or replacement. Otherwise, the note will expire in 2021, without any obligation to pay any portion of the principal or interest. Payments made under the note, if any, would be expensed as incurred. We have not terminated, and we have not materially breached, any of our milk supply agreements with DFA related to the promissory note. We have previously terminated unrelated supply agreements with respect to several plants that were supplied by DFA. In connection with our continued focus on cost control and increased supply chain efficiency, we continue to evaluate our sources of raw milk supply.
Insurance — We use a combination of insurance and self-insurance for a number of risks, including property, workers’ compensation, general liability, automobile liability, product liability and employee health care utilizing high deductibles. Deductibles vary due to insurance market conditions and risk. Liabilities associated with these risks are estimated considering historical claims experience and other actuarial assumptions. Based on current information, we believe that we have established adequate reserves to cover these claims.

Lease and Purchase Obligations — We lease certain property, plant and equipment used in our operations under both capital and operating lease agreements. Such leases, which are primarily for machinery, equipment and vehicles, including our distribution fleet, have lease terms ranging from one to 20 years. Certain of the operating lease agreements require the payment

of additional rentals for maintenance, along with additional rentals based on miles driven or units produced. Certain leases require us to guarantee a minimum value of the leased asset at the end of the lease. Our maximum exposure under those guarantees is not a material amount.
We have entered into various contracts, in the normal course of business, obligating us to purchase minimum quantities of raw materials used in our production and distribution processes, including conventional raw milk, diesel fuel, sugar and other ingredients that are inputs into our finished products. We enter into these contracts from time to time to ensure a sufficient supply of raw ingredients. In addition, we have contractual obligations to purchase various services that are part of our production process.
Litigation, Investigations and Audits On August 9, 2007, two plaintiffs filed a putative class action antitrust complaint against Dean Foods and other milk processors in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. Plaintiffs alleged generally that we, either acting alone or in conjunction with others in the milk industry, lessened competition in the Southeastern United States for the sale of processed fluid Grade A milk to retail outlets and other customers. Plaintiffs further alleged that the defendants’ conduct artificially inflated wholesale prices paid by direct milk purchasers. On January 25, 2016, the district court denied plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. On February 8, 2016, plaintiffs filed a petition for permission to appeal the district court’s order denying class certification. That petition was denied by the Sixth Circuit on June 14, 2016. Although the courts refused to certify the case as a class action, the two original plaintiffs decided to pursue their individual claims for damages. The case was scheduled for trial on March 28, 2017. Prior to trial, the plaintiffs agreed with us to settle the lawsuit. We agreed to pay settlements to the plaintiffs and the parties resolved all outstanding claims in the litigation and agreed to voluntarily dismiss the litigation. The litigation was dismissed on March 21, 2017 with respect to one plaintiff, and on March 26, 2017 with respect to the other plaintiff. We recorded a charge and a corresponding liability in connection with the settlements in the first quarter of 2017.
In addition to the legal proceeding described above, we are party from time to time to certain claims, litigations, audits and investigations.pending or threatened legal proceedings in the ordinary course of our business. Potential liabilities associated with these other matters are not expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.
1315. Segment, Geographic and Customer Information
We operate as a single reportable segment in manufacturing, marketing, selling and distributing a wide variety of branded and private label dairy and dairy case products. We operate 6665 manufacturing facilities which are geographically located largely based on local and regional customer needs and other market factors. We manufacture, market and distribute a wide variety of branded and private label dairy and dairy case products, including fluid milk, ice cream, cultured dairy products, creamers, ice cream mix and other dairy products to retailers, distributors, foodservice outlets, educational institutions and governmental entities across the United States. Our products are primarily delivered through what we believe to be one of the most extensive refrigerated direct-to-store delivery (“DSD”)DSD systems in the United States. Our Chief Executive Officer evaluates the performance of our business based on sales and operating income or loss before facility closing and reorganization costs, litigation settlements, impairments of long-lived assets, gains and losses on the sale of businesses and certain other non-recurring gains and losses.
Geographic Information — Net sales related to our foreign operations comprised less than 1% of our consolidated net sales during each of the three and six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016.2017. None of our long-lived assets are associated with our foreign operations.
Significant Customers — Our largest customer accounted for approximately 17.0%15.6% and 16.2%17.0% of our consolidated net sales in the three months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively and accounted for approximately 17.1%16.1% and 16.3%17.1% of our consolidated net sales in the six months ended June 30, 20172018 and 2016,2017, respectively.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (this “Form 10-Q”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, which are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Forward-looking statements are predictions based on our current expectations and our projections about future events, and are not statements of historical fact. Forward-looking statements include statements concerning our business strategy, among other things, including anticipated trends and developments in, and management plans for, our business and the markets in which we operate. In some cases, you can identify these statements by forward-looking words, such as “estimate,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “plan,” “intend,” “believe,” “forecast,” “foresee,” “likely,” “may,” “should,” “goal,” “target,” “might,” “will,” “could,” “predict,” and “continue,” the negative or plural of these words and other comparable terminology. All forward-looking statements included in this Form 10-Q are based upon information available to us as of the filing date of this Form 10-Q, and we undertake no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements for any reason. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied by these statements. These factors include the matters discussed in “Part I — Item 1A — Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162017 (the "2016"2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K"), as updated herein, and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described under these sections.
Business Overview
We are a leading food and beverage company and the largest processor and direct-to-store distributor of fresh fluid milk and other dairy and dairy case products in the United States, with a vision to be the most admired and trusted provider of wholesome, great-tasting dairy products at every occasion. As we continue to evaluate and seek to maximize the value of our national operational network and our leading brands and product offerings, we have aligned our leadership team, operating strategy, and sales, logisticscommercial and supply chain initiatives into a single operating and reportable segment.
We manufacture, market and distribute a wide variety of branded and private label dairy and dairy case products, including fluid milk, ice cream, cultured dairy products, creamers, ice cream mix and other dairy products to retailers, distributors, foodservice outlets, educational institutions and governmental entities across the United States. Our portfolio includes DairyPure®, the country's first and largest fresh, white milk national brand, and TruMoo®, the leading national flavored milk brand, along with well-known regional dairy brands such as Alta Dena®, Berkeley Farms®, Country Fresh®, Dean’s®, Friendly's®, Garelick Farms®, LAND O LAKES ® milk and cultured products (licensed brand), Lehigh Valley Dairy Farms®, Mayfield ®, McArthur®, Meadow Gold ®, Oak Farms®, PET ® (licensed brand), T.G. Lee®, Tuscan® and more. In all, we have more than 50 national, regional and local dairy brands as well as private labels. Additionally, with our acquisition of Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc., which was completed on June 22, 2017, we nowWe also sell and distribute organic juice, probiotic-infused juices, and fruit-infused waters under the Uncle Matt's Organic® brand. Additionally, we are party to the Organic Valley Fresh joint venture which distributes organic milk under the Organic Valley®brand to retailers. With our majority interest acquisition of Good Karma Foods, Inc. ("Good Karma"), which was completed on June 29, 2018, we now sell and distribute flax-based milk and yogurt products under the Good Karma® brand. Dean Foods also makes and distributes ice cream, cultured products, juices, teas, and bottled water. Due to the perishable nature of our products, we deliver the majority of our products directly to our customers' locations in refrigerated trucks or trailers that we own or lease. We believe that we have one of the most extensive refrigerated direct-to-store delivery ("DSD") systems in the United States. We sell our products primarily on a local or regional basis through our local and regional sales forces, and in some instances, with the assistance of national brokers. Some national customer relationships are coordinated by our centralized corporate sales department or national brokers.

Recent Developments
Uncle Matt's OrganicGood Karma Acquisition
On June 22, 2017,29, 2018, we completed the acquisitionincreased our ownership interest in Good Karma to 67% with an additional investment of Uncle Matt's Organic, Inc. ("Uncle Matt's"). Uncle Matt's is$15.0 million. The additional investment was accounted for as a leading organic juice company offeringstep-acquisition within a wide range of organic juices, including probiotic-infused juices and fruit-infused waters. The total purchase price was $22.0 million, which was funded through a combination of cash on hand and borrowings under our receivables securitization facility. Uncle Matt'sbusiness combination. Good Karma's results of operations will be includedconsolidated in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations from the date of acquisition.
Investment in See Note 3 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the Good Karma acquisition.
On May 4,
Matters Affecting Comparability
Our discussion of the results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 we acquired a non-controlling interest in, and entered into a distribution agreementis affected by our adoption of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Good Karma Foods, Inc. (“Good Karma”Customers ("ASC 606"), on January 1, 2018. Historically, we presented sales of excess raw materials as a reduction of cost of sales within our unaudited Condensed

Consolidated Statements of Operations. On a prospective basis, effective January 1, 2018, in connection with the leading produceradoption of flax-based milkASC 606, we began reporting sales of excess raw materials within the net sales line of our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Sales of excess raw materials included in net sales were $122.9 million and yogurt products. This investment allows us to diversify our portfolio to include plant-based dairy alternatives and provides Good Karma the ability to more rapidly expand distribution across the U.S., as well as increase investments in brand building and product innovation. We do not expect our equity$274.7 million in the earningsthree and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively. Sales of this investmentexcess raw materials included as a reduction to materially impactcost of sales were $137.2 million and $308.2 million in the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. See Notes 1 and 2 to our consolidated financial statements. We are accountingunaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for this investment under the equity method of accounting based upon our ability to exercise significant influence over the investee through our ownership interest and representation on Good Karma's board of directors.additional information.
Results of Operations
Our key performance indicators are brand mix and achieving low cost, and volume performance, which are reflected in gross profit,margin and operating income, and net sales, respectively. We evaluate our financial performance based on sales and operating profitincome or loss before gains and losses on the sale of businesses, facility closing and reorganization costs, asset impairment charges, litigation settlements and other nonrecurring gains and losses. The following table presents certain information concerning our financial results, including information presented as a percentage of net sales:
Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30Three Months Ended June 30 Six Months Ended June 30
2017 2016 2017 20162018 2017 2018 2017
Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars PercentDollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent Dollars Percent
(Dollars in millions)(Dollars in millions)
Net sales$1,926.7
 100.0% $1,848.8
 100.0 % $3,922.4
 100.0% $3,727.6
 100.0%$1,951.2
 100.0 % $1,926.7
 100.0% $3,931.7
 100.0 % $3,922.4
 100.0%
Cost of sales1,459.3
 75.7
 1,355.5
 73.3
 2,992.9
 76.3
 2,730.3
 73.2
1,518.4
 77.8
 1,459.2
 75.7
 3,050.4
 77.6
 2,992.7
 76.3
Gross profit(1)467.4
 24.3
 493.3
 26.7
 929.5
 23.7
 997.3
 26.8
432.8
 22.2
 467.5
 24.3
 881.3
 22.4
 929.7
 23.7
Operating costs and expenses:                              
Selling and distribution338.1
 17.5
 331.2
 17.9
 683.3
 17.4
 664.0
 17.8
336.7
 17.3
 338.0
 17.5
 682.7
 17.4
 683.1
 17.4
General and administrative73.1
 3.8
 86.6
 4.7
 172.7
 4.4
 171.8
 4.6
66.0
 3.3
 72.3
 3.8
 141.5
 3.5
 170.9
 4.3
Amortization of intangibles5.2
 0.3
 4.1
 0.2
 10.3
 0.3
 10.4
 0.3
5.1
 0.3
 5.2
 0.3
 10.2
 0.3
 10.3
 0.3
Facility closing and reorganization costs, net5.8
 0.3
 (1.4) (0.1) 15.1
 0.4
 (0.2) 
67.7
 3.5
 5.8
 0.3
 76.1
 1.9
 15.1
 0.4
Impairment of long-lived assets2.2
 0.1
 
 
 2.2
 0.1
 
 
Other operating income(2.3) (0.1) 
 
 (2.3) (0.1) 
 
Equity in (earnings) loss of unconsolidated affiliate(1.7) (0.1) 
 
 (3.6) (0.1) 
 
Total operating costs and expenses422.2
 21.9
 420.5
 22.7
 881.4
 22.5
 846.0
 22.7
473.7
 24.3
 421.3
 21.9
 906.8
 23.0
 879.4
 22.4
Operating income$45.2
 2.3% $72.8
 3.9 % $48.1
 1.2% $151.3
 4.1%
Operating income (loss)$(40.9) (2.1)% $46.2
 2.4% $(25.5) (0.6)% $50.3
 1.3%
(1)
As disclosed in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in our 20162017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we include certain shipping and handling costs within selling and distribution expense. As a result, our gross profit may not be comparable to other entities that present all shipping and handling costs as a component of cost of sales.

Quarter Ended June 30, 20172018 Compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 20162017
Net Sales — The change in net sales was due to the following:
Three Months Ended  June 30, 2017 vs. 2016Three Months Ended  June 30, 2018 vs. 2017
(In millions)(In millions)
Volume$(66.6)
Pricing and product mix changes108.0
Volume, pricing and product mix changes(102.0)
Acquisitions36.5
3.6
Sales of excess raw materials122.9
Total increase$77.9
$24.5
Net sales increased $77.9$24.5 million, or 4.2%1.3%, during the second quarter of 20172018 as compared to the second quarter of 2016,2017, primarily due to increasedsales of excess raw materials of $122.9 million during the second quarter of 2018. Excluding the impact of sales of excess raw materials, net sales decreased $98.4 million, or 5.1%. Net sales declines were primarily due to fluid milk volume declines from year-ago levels, driven predominantly by overall category declines and the loss of volume from two large retailers starting in the second quarter of 2018, and also lower branded fluid milk volumes due to continued retailer investment in private label products. Net sales were further impacted by decreased pricing, as a result of increasesdecreases in dairy commodity costs from year-ago levels. On average, during the second quarter of 2017,2018, the Class I price was 14.7% above5.9% below prior-year levels. Additionally,Net sales declines were partially offset by volumes associated with the Uncle Matt's acquisition, of Friendly's Ice Cream Holdings Corp. ("Friendly's")which contributed $45.2$3.6 million to net sales in the second quarter of 2017 as compared to $8.7 million in the second quarter of 2016. The Friendly's acquisition closed on June 20, 2016 and net sales in the second quarter of 2016 reflect 11 days of Friendly's operations. See Note 2 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Net sales increases were partially offset by a 2.7% total sales volume decline across all products from year-ago levels. This decline was in excess of our expectations. Volume declines across our fluid milk business, which accounted for approximately 76% of our total sales volume in the second quarter of 2017, represented an approximately 3.4% year-over-year decrease. Our total branded white milk volumes decreased 6.0% year-over-year. These decreases were partially offset by a 1.4% year-over-year increase in our flavored milk volumes.2018.
We generally increase or decrease the prices of our private label fluid dairy products on a monthly basis in correlation with fluctuations in the costs of raw materials, packaging supplies and delivery costs. We manage the pricing of our branded fluid milk products on a longer-term basis, balancing consumer demand with net price realization. However, we continue to balance our product pricing with the execution of our strategy to improve net price realization, and,but in some cases, we are subject to the terms of our sales agreements with respect to the means and/or timing of price increases, which can negatively impact our profitability. The following table sets forth the average monthly Class I “mover” and its components, as well as the average monthly Class II minimum prices for raw skim milk and butterfat for the second quarter of 20172018 compared to the second quarter of 2016:2017:
Three Months Ended June 30*Three Months Ended June 30*
2017 2016 % Change2018 2017 % Change
Class I mover(1)$15.52
 $13.53
 14.7%$14.60
 $15.52
 (5.9)%
Class I raw skim milk mover(1)(2)7.41
 5.88
 26.0
6.05
 7.41
 (18.4)
Class I butterfat mover(2)(3)2.39
 2.24
 6.7
2.50
 2.39
 4.6
Class II raw skim milk minimum(1)(4)6.76
 5.82
 16.2
5.73
 6.76
 (15.2)
Class II butterfat minimum(3)(4)2.50
 2.32
 7.8
2.61
 2.50
 4.4
*The prices noted in this table are not the prices that we actually pay. The federal order minimum prices applicable at any given location for Class I raw skim milk or Class I butterfat are based on the Class I mover prices plus producer premiums and a location differential. Class II prices noted in the table are federal minimum prices, applicable at all locations. Our actual cost also includes procurement costs and other related charges that vary by location and supplier. Please see “Part I — Item 1. Business — Government Regulation — Milk Industry Regulation” in our 20162017 Annual Report on Form 10-K and “— Known Trends and Uncertainties — Prices of Conventional Raw Milk and Other Inputs” below for a more complete description of raw milk pricing.
(1)Prices are per hundredweight.
(2)We process Class I raw skim milk and butterfat into fluid milk products.
(3)Prices are per pound.
(4)We process Class II raw skim milk and butterfat into products such as cottage cheese, creams and creamers, ice cream and sour cream.
Cost of Sales — All expenses incurred to bring a product to completion are included in cost of sales, such as raw material, ingredient and packaging costs; labor costs; and plant and equipment costs. Cost of sales increased 7.7%$59.2 million, or 4.1%, in the second quarter of 20172018 as compared to the second quarter of 2016,2017, primarily due to increasedthe change in reporting of sales of excess raw materials discussed above. Excluding the impact of sales of excess raw materials, cost of sales decreased $63.7 million, or 4.4%, primarily due to decreased dairy commodity costs. The Class I price was 14.7% above5.9% below prior-year levels.

Gross ProfitMargin — Our gross profit percentagemargin decreased to 22.2% in the second quarter of 2018 as compared to 24.3% in the second quarter of 2017 as compared to 26.7% in the second quarter of 2016.2017. This decrease was primarily due to higher input costs and overall volume declines and the change in reporting of excess raw

materials discussed above.above, in addition to a higher mix of private label products in the second quarter of 2018, which carry lower margins than our branded products. Excluding the impact of the change in reporting of excess raw materials, our gross margin would have been 23.7% in the second quarter of 2018.
Operating Costs and Expenses — Operating costs and expenses increased $1.7$52.4 million, or 0.4%12.4%, in the second quarter of 20172018 as compared to the second quarter of 2016.2017. Significant changes to operating costs and expenses in the second quarter of 20172018 as compared to the second quarter of 20162017 include the following:
Selling and distribution costs increaseddecreased by $6.9$1.3 million during the second quarter of 20172018 primarily due to a decrease in insurance costs of $3.1 million and lower salaries and wages and employee-related costs of $5.6 million associated with lower headcount in comparison to the prior year as we execute our enterprise-wide cost productivity plan. These decreases were partly offset by higher freight insurancecosts of $6.1 million and external commissionsfuel costs partially offset by lower incentive compensation and advertising costs.of $2.3 million.
General and administrative costs decreased by $13.5$6.3 million during the second quarter of 20172018 in comparison to the prior period primarily due to decreases in salaries and wages and employee-related costs of $8.5 million associated with lower incentive compensation comparedheadcount in comparison to the prior period.
Amortization of intangibles increasedyear as we execute our enterprise-wide cost productivity plan. These decreases were partially offset by $1.1 million duringcosts incurred in connection with our enterprise-wide cost productivity plan in the second quarter of 2017 primarily due to the amortization of intangibles acquired in the Friendly's acquisition.2018.
Facility closing and reorganization costs, net increased by $7.2$61.8 million during the second quarter of 2017 primarily due to costs associated with the implementation of our organizational structure change and additional asset write-downs and other charges associated with closed facilities.2018. See Note 1113 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We recorded impairment charges to our long-lived assets of $2.2 million during the second quarter of 2018. There were no impairment charges during the second quarter of 2017. See Note 13 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We recorded a $2.3 million gain from the remeasurement of our investment in Good Karma during the second quarter of 2018 in connection with a step-acquisition on June 29, 2018. See Note 3 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We recorded $1.7 million of equity in the earnings of our Organic Valley Fresh joint venture during the second quarter of 2018. See Note 4 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other (Income) Expense — Other expense increased $1.0decreased $1.8 million during the second quarter of 20172018 as compared to the second quarter of 2016.2017. This increasedecrease in expense was primarily due to declines in foreign currency exchange gains in the second quarter of 2017 as compared to the prior period, partially offset by slightly lower interest expense in the second quarter of 2017 as2018 compared to the second quarterprior period, primarily due to the repayment in full of 2016.the $142 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of subsidiary senior notes on October 16, 2017.
Income Taxes — Income tax expensebenefit was recorded at an effective rate of 40.3%24.6% for the second quarter of 2017 as2018 compared to income tax expense at a 42.6%40.3% effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2016.2017. Generally, our effective tax rate varies primarily based on our profitability level and the relative earnings of our business units. In the second quarter of 2018, the company recorded a discrete tax benefit of $16.2 million, primarily related to one-time tax impacts related to facility closing and reorganization costs and impairment charges. Excluding the impact of these discrete items, our effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2018 was 27.5%.
Six Months Ended June 30, 20172018 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 20162017
Net Sales — The change in net sales was due to the following:
Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 vs. 2016Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 vs. 2017
(In millions)(In millions)
Volume$(110.8)
Pricing and product mix changes227.5
Volume, pricing and product mix changes(273.9)
Acquisitions78.1
8.5
Sales of excess raw materials$274.7
Total increase$194.8
$9.3

Net sales increased $194.8$9.3 million, or 5.2%0.2%, during the first six months of 20172018 as compared to the first six months of 2016,2017, primarily due to increasedsales of excess raw materials of $274.7 million during the first six months of 2018. Excluding the impact of sales of excess raw materials, net sales decreased $265.4 million, or 6.8%. Net sales declines were primarily due to fluid milk volume declines from year-ago levels, driven predominantly by overall category declines, the loss of volume from two large retailers starting in the second quarter of 2018 and lower branded fluid milk volumes due to continued retailer investment in private

label products. Net sales were further impacted by decreased pricing, as a result of increasesdecreases in dairy commodity costs from year-ago levels. On average, during the first six months of 2017,2018, the Class I price was 16.1% above11.1% below prior-year levels. Additionally,Net sales declines were partially offset by volumes associated with the Friendly'sUncle Matt's acquisition, which contributed $86.8$8.5 million to net sales induring the first six months of 2017 as compared to $8.7 million in the first six months of 2016. The Friendly's acquisition closed on June 20, 2016 and net sales in the first six months of 2016 reflect 11 days of Friendly's operations. See Note 2 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. Net sales increases were partially offset by a 2.0% total sales volume decline across all products from year-ago levels. This decline was in excess of our expectations.Volume declines across our fluid milk business, which accounted for approximately 77% of our total sales volume in first six months of 2017, represented an approximately 2.6% year-over-year decrease. Our total branded white milk volumes decreased 5.1% year-over-year. These decreases were partially offset by a 2.9% year-over-year increase in our flavored milk volumes.

2018.
The following table sets forth the average monthly Class I “mover” and its components, as well as the average monthly Class II minimum prices for raw skim milk and butterfat for the first six months of 20172018 in comparison to the first six months of 2016:2017:
Six Months Ended June 30*Six Months Ended June 30*
2017 2016 % Change2018 2017 % Change
Class I mover(1)$16.27
 $14.01
 16.1%$14.47
 $16.27
 (11.1)%
Class I raw skim milk mover(1)(2)8.12
 5.79
 40.2
6.04
 8.12
 (25.6)
Class I butterfat mover(2)(3)2.41
 2.41
 
2.47
 2.41
 2.5
Class II raw skim milk minimum(1)(4)7.39
 6.00
 23.2
5.64
 7.39
 (23.7)
Class II butterfat minimum(3)(4)2.48
 2.31
 7.4
2.51
 2.48
 1.2
*The prices noted in this table are not the prices that we actually pay. The federal order minimum prices applicable at any given location for Class I raw skim milk or Class I butterfat are based on the Class I mover prices plus producer premiums and a location differential. Class II prices noted in the table are federal minimum prices, applicable at all locations. Our actual cost also includes procurement costs and other related charges that vary by location and supplier. Please see “Part I — Item 1. Business — Government Regulation — Milk Industry Regulation” in our 20162017 Annual Report on Form 10-K and “— Known Trends and Uncertainties — Prices of Conventional Raw Milk and Other Inputs” below for a more complete description of raw milk pricing.
(1)Prices are per hundredweight.
(2)We process Class I raw skim milk and butterfat into fluid milk products.
(3)Prices are per pound.
(4)We process Class II raw skim milk and butterfat into products such as cottage cheese, creams and creamers, ice cream and sour cream.
Cost of Sales — Cost of sales increased 9.6%$57.7 million, or 1.9%, in the first six months of 20172018 as compared to the first six months of 2016,2017, primarily due to increasedthe change in reporting of sales of excess raw materials discussed above. Excluding the impact of sales of excess raw materials, costs of sales decreased $216.9 million, or 7.2%, primarily due to decreased dairy commodity costs. The Class I price was 16.1% above11.1% below prior-year levels.
Gross ProfitMargin — Our gross profit percentagemargin decreased to 22.4% for the first six months of 2018 as compared to 23.7% for the first six months of 2017 as compared2017. This decrease was primarily due to 26.8%the change in reporting of excess raw materials discussed above. Excluding the impact of the change in reporting of excess raw materials, our gross margin would have been 24.1% for the first six months of 2016. This decrease was primarily due to higher input costs and overall volume declines discussed above.2018.
Operating Costs and Expenses — Operating costs and expenses increased $35.4$27.4 million, or 4.2%3.1%, in the first six months of 20172018 as compared to the first six months of 2016.2017. Significant changes to operating costs and expenses in the first six months of 20172018 as compared to the first six months of 20162017 include the following:
Selling and distribution costs increaseddecreased by $19.3$0.4 million during the first six months of 20172018 primarily due to higher freight,lower salaries and wages and other employee-related costs of $9.2 million associated with lower headcount in comparison to the prior year as we execute our enterprise-wide cost productivity plan, decreases in insurance costs of $3.4 million and external commissionsdeclines in advertising and promotions costs partiallyof $3.5 million. These decreases were partly offset by decreased incentive compensationincreases in freight costs of $15.2 million and advertising costs.fuel costs of $4.0 million.
General and administrative costs decreased by $29.5 million in the first six months of 2018 in comparison to the prior period. General and administrative costs in the first six months of 2017 of $170.9 million included a charge due to litigation settlements and related legal expenses of $17.0 million. General and administrative costs of $141.5 million in the first six months of 2018 reflect decreases in salaries and wages and other employee-related costs of $12.6 million associated with lower headcount in comparison to the prior year as we execute our enterprise-wide cost productivity plan.
Facility closing and reorganization costs, net increased by $0.9$61.0 million during the first six months of 2017 primarily due to the litigation settlements reached in the first quarter of 2017 and the related legal expenses, partially offset by lower incentive compensation compared to the prior period.
Amortization of intangibles decreased by $0.1 million during the first six months of 2017 related to the extension of the useful lives of certain of our finite-lived trademarks in conjunction with our strategy around our ice cream brands in the first quarter of 2016, partially offset by the amortization of intangibles acquired in the Friendly's acquisition.
Facility closing and reorganization costs increased by $15.3 million during the first six months of 2017 primarily due to costs associated with the implementation of our organizational structure change and additional asset write-downs and other charges associated with closed facilities.2018. See Note 1113 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other (Income) Expense — Other expense increased $1.6We recorded impairment charges to our long-lived assets of $2.2 million during the first six months of 20172018. There were no impairment charges during the first six months of 2017. See Note 13 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We recorded a $2.3 million gain from the remeasurement of our investment in Good Karma during the first six months of 2018 in connection with a step-acquisition on June 29, 2018. See Note 3 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
We recorded $3.6 million of equity in the earnings of our Organic Valley Fresh joint venture during the first six months of 2018. See Note 4 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Other Expense — Other expense decreased $4.9 million during the first six months of 2018 as compared to the first six months of 2016.2017. This increasedecrease in expense was primarily due to declines in foreign currency exchange gainslower interest expense in the first six monthssecond quarter of 2017 as2018 compared to the prior period, in addition to slightly higher interest expense in the first six months of 2017 as comparedprimarily due to the first six monthsrepayment in full of 2016.the $142 million outstanding aggregate principal amount of subsidiary senior notes on October 16, 2017.
Income Taxes — Income tax expensebenefit was recorded at an effective rate of 50.7% for23.0% in the first six months of 2017 as2018 compared to income tax expense at a 39.9%50.7% effective tax rate forin the first six months of 2016.2017. Generally, our effective tax rate varies primarily based on

our profitability level and the relative earnings of our business units. In the first half of 2017,2018, our effective tax rate was impacted by the adoptionrecognition of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09 which requires excess tax benefits and tax deficiencies related to share-based payments to be recorded in the provision for income taxes.taxes of $0.9 million, return to provision adjustments resulting in a $0.4 million tax benefit, an $18.6 million tax benefit of one-time tax impacts related to facility closing and reorganization costs and impairment charges, $0.6 million related to the gain on the Good Karma step-acquisition, and $0.6 million of other one-time tax impacts, including interest on uncertain tax positions and state tax rate changes. Excluding the $1.3 millionimpact of tax expense recorded because of the adoption,these discrete items, our effective tax rate for the first half of 20172018 was 42.5%28.1%.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe that our cash on hand coupled with future cash flows from operations and other available sources of liquidity, including our $450 million senior secured revolving credit facility and our $450 million receivables securitization facility, together will provide sufficient liquidity to allow us to meet our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months, including the repayment of the $142 million aggregate principal amount of subsidiary senior notes, which mature on October 15, 2017. Additionalmonths. Our anticipated uses of cash for the remainder of 20172018 include costs to execute our enterprise-wide cost productivity plan and other strategic initiatives; capital expenditures; working capital; pension contributions; financial obligations, including tax payments; dividend payments; and certain other costs that may be necessary to execute our strategic initiatives and invest to grow our business. OnWe are also authorized to repurchase shares of our common stock pursuant to a stock repurchase program authorized by our Board of Directors. Additionally, on an ongoing basis, we evaluate and consider strategic acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, or other transactions to create shareholder value and enhance financial performance. However, weWe may also, from time to time, raise additional funds through borrowings or public or private sales of debt or equity securities. The amount, nature and timing of any borrowings or sales of debt or equity securities will depend on our operating performance and other circumstances; our then-current commitments and obligations; the amount, nature and timing of our capital requirements; any limitations imposed by our current credit arrangements; and overall market conditions. As discussed below, we have also instituted a cash dividend policy and may repurchase shares of our common stock opportunistically.
As of June 30, 2017,2018, we had total cash on hand of $31.5$25.4 million, of which $11.7$3.4 million was attributable to our foreign operations. We are evaluating strategiesHistorically, the cash held by our foreign subsidiary was reinvested indefinitely and alternatives with respectwas generally subject to U.S. income tax only upon repatriation to the U.S. However, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act") required us to pay a one-time transition tax in 2017 on cumulative undistributed foreign earnings for which we had not previously provided U.S. taxes. We analyzed our foreign working capital and cash requirements and the potential tax liabilities that would be attributable to a repatriation of previously taxed earnings. In the second quarter 2018, we repatriated $9.9 million of cash resulting in no additional tax expense. Additionally, we will not consider the future earnings of our foreign operations.subsidiary to be permanently reinvested and have determined that any tax effects resulting from this change would be immaterial.
At June 30, 2017,2018, we had $911.4$862.1 million of long-term debt obligations, excluding unamortized discounts and debt issuance costs of $7.2$5.1 million, and $714.9$617.0 million of combined available future borrowing capacity under our senior secured revolving credit facility and receivables securitization facility, subject to compliance with the covenants in our credit agreements. Based on our current expectations, we believe our liquidity and capital resources will be sufficient to operate our business.
Cash Dividends — In November 2013, we announced thataccordance with our Board of Directors had adopted a cash dividend policy. Under the policy, holders of our common stock will receive dividends when and as declared by our Board of Directors. Beginning in 2015, all awards of restricted stock units, performance stock units and phantom shares provide for cash dividend equivalent units, which vest in cash at the same time as the underlying award. Quarterly dividends of $0.09 per share were paid in March and June of 20172018 and 2016,2017, totaling approximately $16.4 million and $16.5 million for each of the first six months of 20172018 and 2016, respectively.2017. We expect to pay quarterly dividends of $0.09 per share ($0.36 per share annually) for the remainder of 2017.2018. Our cash dividend policy is subject to modification, suspension or cancellation in any manner and at any time. Dividends are presented as a reduction to retained earnings in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of

Stockholders’ Equity unless we have an accumulated deficit as of the end of the period, in which case they are reflected as a reduction to additional paid-in capital. See Note 79 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility — We have a credit agreement (as amended, the "Credit Agreement") pursuant to which the lenders have provided us with a senior secured revolving credit facility in the amount of up to $450 million (the “Credit Facility”) with a maturity date of January 4, 2022. Under the Credit Agreement, we have the right to request an increase of the aggregate commitments under the Credit Facility by up to $200 million, which we may request to be made available as either term loans or revolving loans, without the consent of any lenders not participating in such increase, subject to specified conditions. The Credit Facility is available for the issuance of up to $75 million of letters of credit and up to $100 million of swing line loans.
Loans outstanding under the Credit Facility will bear interest, at our option, at either (i) the LIBO Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus a margin of between 1.75% and 2.50% (2.00% as of June 30, 2017)2018) based on our total net leverage ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement), or (ii) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus a margin of between 0.75% and 1.50% (1.00% as of June 30, 2017)2018) based on our total net leverage ratio.
We may make optional prepayments of loans under the Credit Facility,loans, in whole or in part, without premium or penalty (other than applicable breakage costs). Subject to certain exceptions and conditions described in the Credit Agreement, we will be obligated to prepay the Credit Facility, but without a corresponding commitment reduction, with the net cash proceeds of certain asset sales and with casualty insurance proceeds. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by our existing and future domestic material restricted subsidiaries (as defined in the Credit Agreement), which are substantially all of our wholly-owned U.S. subsidiaries other than the receivables securitization facility subsidiaries (the “Guarantors”).

The Credit Facility is secured by a first priority perfected security interest in substantially all of our assets and the assets of the Guarantors, whether consisting of personal, tangible or intangible property, including a pledge of, and a perfected security interest in, (i) all of the shares of capital stock of the Guarantors and (ii) 65% of the shares of capital stock of our and the Guarantors' first-tier foreign subsidiaries that are material restricted subsidiaries, in each case subject to certain exceptions as set forth in the Credit Agreement. The collateral does not include, among other things, (a) any of our real property, (b) the capital stock and any assets of any unrestricted subsidiary, (c) any capital stock of any direct or indirect subsidiary of Dean Holding Company ("Legacy Dean"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, which owns any real property, or (d) receivables sold pursuant to the receivables securitization facility.
 The Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and covenants, including, but not limited to specified restrictions on indebtedness, liens, guarantee obligations, mergers, acquisitions, consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions, sales of assets, leases, payment of dividends and other restricted payments during a default or non-compliance with the financial covenants, investments, loans and advances, transactions with affiliates and sale and leaseback transactions. The Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default and related cure provisions. We are required to comply with (i) a maximum total net leverage ratio of 4.25x (which, for purposes of calculating indebtedness, excludes borrowings under our receivables securitization facility); and (ii) a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio of 2.25x. In addition, the Credit Agreement imposes certain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and make other restricted payments if our total net leverage ratio (including borrowings under our receivables securitization facility) is in excess of 3.50x.
At June 30, 2017,2018, we had no outstanding borrowings of $1.3 million under the Credit Facility. Our average daily balance under the Credit Facility during the six months ended June 30, 20172018 was $1.7$2.6 million. There were no letters of credit issued under the Credit Facility as of June 30, 2017.2018.
Dean Foods Receivables Securitization Facility — We have an amended and restated receivables purchase agreement (as amended), which provides us with a $450 million receivables securitization facility pursuant to which certain of our subsidiaries sell their accounts receivable to two wholly-owned entities intended to be bankruptcy-remote. The entities then transfer the receivables to third-party asset-backed commercial paper conduits sponsored by major financial institutions. The assets and liabilities of these two entities are fully reflected in our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, and the securitization is treated as a borrowing for accounting purposes.
The receivables securitization facility has a liquidity termination date of January 4, 2020 and bears interest at a variable rate based upon commercial paper and one-month LIBO rates plus an applicable margin based on our net leverage ratio. The receivables purchase agreement contains covenants consistent with those in the Credit Agreement. Advances outstanding under the receivables securitization facility will bear interest between 0.90%at a variable rate based on commercial paper and 1.05%,one month LIBO rates plus an applicable margin, and the Company will pay an unused fee between 0.40% and 0.55% on undrawn amounts, in each case based on the Company's total net leverage ratio.

Based on the monthly borrowing base formula, we had the ability to borrow up to $448.4$435.7 million of the total commitment amount under the receivables securitization facility as of June 30, 2017.2018. The total amount of receivables sold to these entities as of June 30, 20172018 was $561.5$557.8 million. During the first six months of 2017,2018, we borrowed $1.1$1.2 billion and repaid $1.1$1.3 billion under the facility with a remaining balance of $65.0$160.0 million as of June 30, 2017.2018. In addition to letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $117.2$108.7 million that were issued but undrawn, the remaining available borrowing capacity was $266.2$167.0 million at June 30, 2017.2018. Our average daily balance under this facility during the six months ended June 30, 20172018 was $44.2$168.8 million.
At August 3, 2017,2, 2018, we had $50.0$115.7 million of outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and the receivables securitization facility, excluding letters of credit in the aggregate amount of $117.1$108.7 million that were issued but undrawn.
Covenant Compliance — As of June 30, 2017,2018, we were in compliance with all covenants under our credit agreements. The following describes our financial covenants pursuant to our current credit agreements.
The Credit Agreement and the purchase agreement governing our receivables securitization facility require us to maintain a total net leverage ratio less than 4.25x as of the end of each fiscal quarter. In addition, the Credit Agreement imposes certain restrictions on our ability to pay dividends and make other restricted payments if our total net leverage ratio (including borrowings under our receivables securitization facility) exceeds 3.5x.3.50x. As described in more detail in our Credit Agreement and the purchase agreement governing our receivables securitization facility, the total net leverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of consolidated funded indebtedness, less cash up to $50 million to the extent held by us and our restricted subsidiaries, to consolidated EBITDA for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended on the measurement date. Consolidated funded indebtedness excludes borrowings under our receivables securitization facility and is calculated on a pro forma basis to give effect to permitted acquisitions, divestitures or refinancing of indebtedness.

Consolidated EBITDA is comprised of net income for us and our restricted subsidiaries plus interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization expense and other non-cash expenses, certain pro forma cost savings add-backs in connection with permitted acquisitions and dispositions, and certain other add-backs for non-recurring charges and other adjustments permitted in calculating covenant compliance under the Credit Agreement, and is calculated on a pro forma basis.
The Credit Agreement and the purchase agreement governing our receivables securitization facility require us to maintain an interest coverage ratio of at least 2.25x as of the end of each fiscal quarter. As described in more detail in the Credit Agreement and the purchase agreement governing our receivables securitization facility, our interest coverage ratio is calculated as the ratio of consolidated EBITDA to consolidated interest expense for the period of four consecutive fiscal quarters ended on the measurement date. Consolidated EBITDA is calculated as described above in the discussion of our leverage ratio. Consolidated interest expense is comprised of consolidated interest expense paid or payable in cash by us and our restricted subsidiaries, as calculated in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, but excluding write-offs or amortization of deferred financing fees and amounts paid on early termination of swap agreements, calculated on a pro forma basis.
Dean Foods Company Senior Notes due 2023 — On February 25, 2015, we issued $700 million in aggregate principal amount of 6.50% senior notes due 2023 (the “2023 Notes”) at an issue price of 100% of the principal amount of the 2023 Notes in a private placement for resale to “qualified institutional buyers” as defined in Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and in offshore transactions pursuant to Regulation S under the Securities Act.
In connection with the issuance of the 2023 Notes, we paid certain arrangement fees of approximately $7.0 million to initial purchasers and other fees of approximately $1.8 million, which were deferred and netted against the outstanding debt balance, and will be amortized to interest expense over the remaining term of the 2023 Notes.
The 2023 Notes are our senior unsecured obligations. Accordingly, the 2023 Notes rank equally in right of payment with all of our existing and future senior obligations and are effectively subordinated in right of payment to all of our existing and future secured obligations, including obligations under our Credit Facility and receivables securitization facility, to the extent of the value of the collateral securing such obligations. The 2023 Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis, jointly and severally, by our subsidiaries that guarantee obligations under the Credit Facility.
The 2023 Notes will mature on March 15, 2023 and bear interest at an annual rate of 6.50%. Interest on the 2023 Notes is payable semi-annually in arrears in March and September of each year.
We may, at our option, redeem all or a portion of the 2023 Notes at any time on or after March 15, 2018 at the applicable redemption prices specified in the indenture governing the 2023 Notes (the "Indenture"), plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date. We are also entitled to redeem up to 40% of the aggregate principal amount of the 2023 Notes before March 15, 2018 with the net cash proceeds that we receive from certain equity offerings at a redemption price equal to 106.5% of the principal amount of the 2023 Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date. In addition, prior to March 15, 2018, we may redeem all or a portion of the 2023 Notes, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof, plus a “make-whole” premium and accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to, but excluding, the applicable redemption date.
If we undergo certain kinds of changes of control, holders of the 2023 Notes have the right to require us to repurchase all or any portion of such holder’s 2023 Notes at 101% of the principal amount of the notes being repurchased, plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the date of repurchase.
The Indenture contains covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to: (i) create certain liens; (ii) enter into sale and lease-back transactions; (iii) assume, incur or guarantee indebtedness for borrowed money that is secured by a lien on certain principal properties (or on any shares of capital stock of our subsidiaries that own such principal properties) without securing

the 2023 Notes on a pari passu basis; and (iv) consolidate with or merge with or into, or sell, transfer, convey or lease all or substantially all of our properties and assets, taken as a whole, to another person.
The carrying value under the 2023 Notes at June 30, 20172018 was $693.8$694.9 million, net of unamortized debt issuance costs of $6.2$5.1 million.
Subsidiary Senior Notes due 2017 — Legacy Dean had certain senior notes outstanding at the time of its acquisition, of which one series remains outstanding ($142 million aggregate principal amount)and matures on October 15, 2017. The carrying value under these notes at June 30, 2017 was $141.1 million, net of unamortized discounts of $0.9 million, at 6.90% interest. The indenture governing the Legacy Dean senior notes does not contain financial covenants but does contain certain restrictions, including a prohibition against Legacy Dean and its subsidiaries granting liens on certain of their real property interests and a prohibition against Legacy Dean granting liens on the stock of its subsidiaries. The Legacy Dean senior notes are not guaranteed by Dean Foods Company or Legacy Dean’s wholly-owned subsidiaries.

Historical Cash Flow
The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities:
Six Months Ended June 30Six Months Ended June 30
2017 2016 Change2018 2017 Change
(In thousands)(In thousands)
Net cash flows from operations:     
Net cash flows from continuing operations:     
Operating activities$79,180
 $125,319
 $(46,139)$120,760
 $79,180
 $41,580
Investing activities(62,666) (192,362) 129,696
(38,198) (62,666) 24,468
Financing activities(2,985) 30,944
 (33,929)(73,640) (2,985) (70,655)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
 (825) 825
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents$13,529
 $(36,924) $50,453
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents$8,922
 $13,529
 $(4,607)
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $79.2increased by $41.6 million in the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to $125.3 millionthe six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase was primarily attributable to lower dairy commodity costs and better working capital management in comparison to the prior period, partially offset by lower operating income in the first six months of 2018. Additionally, in the six months ended June 30, 2016. The decrease was primarily attributable to2017, we made a discretionary pension contribution of $38.5 million to our company-sponsored pension plans and lower operating income in the first six months of 2017.plans.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities decreased by $129.7$24.5 million in the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2016. This2017. The decrease was primarily attributable to the $157.3 million purchase price for the Friendly's acquisition, recorded in the second quarter of 2016, as compared to the purchase price, net of cash acquired, of $21.6 million paid for the Uncle Matt's acquisition, which closed in the second quarter of 2017, and other investments of $9.0 million in the first six months ended June 30, 2017.of 2017, as compared to the purchase price, net of cash acquired, of $13.3 million paid for the Good Karma acquisition, which closed in the second quarter of 2018. Additionally, proceeds from the sale of fixed assets were $9.9 million higher in the first six months of 2018 in comparison to the prior period. Partially offsetting the decrease, capital expenditures were $2.7 million higher in the first six months of 2018 in comparison to the prior period.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $3.0increased by $70.7 million in the six months ended June 30, 20172018 compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $30.9 million in the six months ended June 30, 2016.2017. This changeincrease was driven byprimarily attributable to net debt proceeds from borrowingsrepayments of $17.2$56.8 million in the first six months of 2017,2018 as compared to $73.3net debt proceeds of $16.4 million in the first six months of 2016.2017. Net debt proceeds were partially offset by payments of financing costs related to the amendments to our Credit Agreement and receivables purchase agreement of $1.8 million in the first six months of 2017. Additionally, we made $25.0 million of share repurchases under our stock repurchase program in the first six months of 2016.

Contractual Obligations
As of June 30, 2017, there wereThere have been no material changes outside the ordinary course of business to the information provided with respect to our contractual obligations, including indebtedness and purchase and lease obligations, as reporteddisclosed in our 20162017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as reflected in the table below:10-K.
 Payments Due by Period
 Total 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Thereafter
 (in millions)
Receivables securitization facility(1)$65.0
 $
 $
 $
 $65.0
 $
 $
Credit Facility(1)1.3
 
 
 
 
 
 1.3
Interest payments(2)326.5
 60.8
 51.3
 51.3
 47.4
 47.4
 68.3
Total$392.8
 $60.8
 $51.3
 $51.3
 $112.4
 $47.4
 $69.6
(1)
Represents amounts outstanding under our receivables securitization facility and Credit Facility at June 30, 2017. On January 4, 2017, we amended our receivables purchase agreement to extend the maturity date to January 4, 2020, and we amended our Credit Agreement to extend the maturity date to January 4, 2022. See Note 5 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the January 4, 2017 amendments to the receivables purchase agreement and the Credit Agreement.
(2)
Includes fixed rate interest obligations and interest on variable rate debt based on the outstanding balances and interest rates in effect at June 30, 2017. Interest that may be due in the future on variable rate borrowings under the Credit Facility and receivables securitization facility will vary based on the interest rate in effect at the time and the borrowings outstanding at the time. On January 4, 2017, we amended the purchase agreement governing the receivables securitization facility to modify certain pricing terms such that advances outstanding under the receivables securitization facility will bear interest between 0.90% and 1.05%, and the Company will pay an unused fee between 0.40% and 0.55% on undrawn amounts, in each case based on the Company's total net leverage ratio. On January 4, 2017, we amended the Credit Agreement to modify the definition of “Applicable Rate” to reduce the interest rate margins such that loans outstanding under the Credit Facility will bear interest, at our option, at either (x) the LIBO Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus a margin of between 1.75% and 2.50% based on our total net leverage ratio, or (y) the Alternate Base Rate (as defined in the Credit Agreement) plus a margin of between 0.75% and 1.50% based on our total net leverage ratio. See Note 5 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the January 4, 2017 amendments to the receivables purchase agreement and the Credit Agreement.
Other Long-Term Liabilities
We offer pension benefits through various defined benefit pension plans and also offer certain health care and life insurance benefits to eligible employees and their eligible dependents upon the retirement of such employees. Reported costs of providing non-contributory defined pension benefits and other postretirement benefits are dependent upon numerous factors, assumptions and estimates. For example, these costs are impacted by actual employee demographics (including age, compensation levels and employment periods), the level of contributions made to the plan and earnings on plan assets. Pension and postretirement costs also may be significantly affected by changes in key actuarial assumptions, including anticipated rates of return on plan assets and the discount rates used in determining the projected benefit obligation and annual periodic pension costs.

On April 3, 2017, we made a discretionary contribution of $38.5 million to our company-sponsored pension plans. We do not expect to contribute an additional $0.8 millionmake any contributions to theour company-sponsored pension plans and $2.1 million to the postretirement health plans during the remainder of 2017.in 2018.
Other Commitments and Contingencies
In 2001, in connection with our acquisition of Legacy Dean, we purchased Dairy Farmers of America’s (“DFA”) 33.8% interest in our operations. In connection with that transaction, we issued a contingent, subordinated promissory note to DFA in the original principal amount of $40 million. The promissory note has a 20-year term and bears interest based on the consumer price index. Interest will not be paid in cash but will be added to the principal amount of the note annually, up to a maximum principal amount of $96 million. We may prepay the note in whole or in part at any time, without penalty. The note will become payable only if we materially breach or terminate one of our related milk supply agreements with DFA without renewal or replacement. Otherwise, the note will expire in 2021, without any obligation to pay any portion of the principal or interest. Payments made under the note, if any, would be expensed as incurred. We have not terminated, and we have not materially breached, any of our related milk supply agreements with DFA related to the promissory note. We have previously terminated unrelated

supply agreements with respect to several plants that were supplied by DFA. In connection with our goals of cost control and supply chain efficiency, we continue to evaluate our sources of raw milk supply.
We also have the following commitments and contingent liabilities, in addition to contingent liabilities related to ordinary course litigation, investigations and audits:
certain indemnification obligations related to businesses that we have divested;
certain lease obligations, which require us to guarantee the minimum value of the leased asset at the end of the lease;
selected levels of property and casualty risks, primarily related to employee health care, workers’ compensation claims and other casualty losses; and
certain litigation-related contingencies.
See Note 1214 to our unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
Future Capital Requirements
During 2017,2018, we intend to invest a total of approximately $120$125 million to $130$150 million in capital expenditures, primarily in support of our enterprise-wide cost productivity plan and other strategic initiatives and for our existing manufacturing facilities and in support of our strategic initiatives. Wefacilities. For 2018, we expect cash interest to be approximately $59 million to $60$56 million based upon current debt levels and projected forward interest rates under our Credit Facility.Facility and receivables securitization facility. Cash interest excludes amortization of deferred financing fees and bond discounts of approximately $5$3 million.
On an ongoing basis, we evaluate and consider strategic acquisitions, divestitures, joint ventures, or other transactions to create shareholder value and enhance financial performance. We have also instituted a cash dividend policy and may repurchase shares of our common stock opportunistically.stock.
Known Trends and Uncertainties
PricesCompetitive Environment, Volume Performance and Enterprise-Wide Cost Productivity Plan
The fluid milk industry remains highly competitive, and we are currently navigating a number of challenging dynamics across our cost structure, volumes, customers, and product mix. We continue to navigate a rapidly-changing industry landscape and a dynamic retail environment. Within private label fluid milk, competition for volume has increased significantly, and in some cases, we have lost volume. As a result, we have experienced increased levels of volume deleverage that have negatively impacted our operating income. In addition, retailers continue to aggressively price their private label products, which we believe negatively impacts our branded product sales, resulting in compressed margins.
During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we experienced fluid milk volume declines from year-ago levels, driven predominantly by overall category declines and the loss of volume from two large retailers starting in the second quarter of 2018.
We expect marketplace volume and mix challenges to continue for the remainder of 2018. These challenges make the execution of our commercial initiatives and our enterprise-wide cost productivity plan critical to navigating our volume and competitive pressures.

We have historically targeted annual cost productivity savings mainly to offset cost inflation and volume deleverage, and in 2018, we are challenging ourselves to generate additional savings. In addition, we are implementing an aggressive enterprise-wide cost productivity plan to significantly reset our cost structure with targeted cost savings incremental to our annual productivity savings. We currently have legacy processes and systems that are fragmented and decentralized in many areas, which has created a cost structure that is disproportionately sensitive to small percentage declines in volume. We have organized our enterprise-wide cost productivity plan into three targeted work streams: rescaling our supply chain, optimizing spend management and integrating our operating model.We believe this plan is necessary to support our business strategy and deliver more consistent earnings and cash flow over the long term. The plan will be phased over several years and will require significant one-time investments, including investments in people, infrastructure, technology and systems, which will negatively impact our profitability and cash flows in 2018.
Due to the phased implementation and timing of our initiatives and investments, we will not generate enough cost savings in 2018 to offset the planned investments, cost inflation and volume pressures. In addition, inflation, declining volumes and competitive pricing pressures have negated, and may continue to negate, some of the impact of our cost saving efforts. We also must execute our plans within our projected time frames in order to meet our financial projections and to remain competitive in the marketplace. For further discussion of the risks relating to our cost productivity plan, see “Part I - Item 1A. Risk Factors - Business, Competitive and Strategic Risks - We may not realize anticipated benefits from our enterprise-wide cost productivity plan, and we may not complete this plan within our projected time frames, either of which could materially adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows" in our 2017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Conventional Raw Milk and Other Inputs
Conventional Raw Milk and ButterfatThe primary raw materials used in the products we manufacture, distribute and sell are conventional raw milk (which contains both raw skim milk and butterfat) and bulk cream. On a monthly basis, the federal government and certain state governments set minimum prices for raw milk. The regulated minimum prices differ based on how the raw milk is utilized. Raw milk processed into fluid milk is priced at the Class I price and raw milk processed into products such as cottage cheese, creams and creamers, ice cream and sour cream is priced at the Class II price. Generally, we pay the federal minimum prices for raw milk, plus certain producer premiums (or “over-order” premiums) and location differentials. We also incur other raw milk procurement costs in some locations (such as hauling and field personnel). A change in the federal minimum price does not necessarily mean an identical change in our total raw milk costs as over-order premiums may increase or decrease. This relationship is different in every region of the country and can sometimes differ within a region based on supplier arrangements. However, in general, the overall change in our raw milk costs can be linked to the change in federal minimum prices. Because our Class II products typically have a higher fat content than that contained in raw milk, we also purchase bulk cream for use in some of our Class II products. Bulk cream is typically purchased based on a multiple of the Grade AA butter price on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange.
Prices for conventional raw milk induring the second quarter of 20172018 were approximately 14.7% higher6% lower than year-ago levels and decreasedincreased approximately 9%2% sequentially from the first quarter of 2017.2018. We are currently expectprojecting Class I raw milk costs to increase by approximately 8% sequentiallyremain relatively benign for the remainder of 2018. Commodity price changes primarily impact our branded business as the changes in the third quarter of 2017 (an approximately 11% increase year-over-year).raw milk costs are essentially a pass-through cost on our private label products. Given the multitude of factors that influence the dairy commodity environment, we acknowledge the potential for future volatility.
Fuel, Resin and ResinExternal Freight CostsWe purchase diesel fuel to operate our extensive DSD system, and we incur fuel surcharge expense related to the products we deliver through third-party carriers. Although we may utilize forward purchase contracts and other instruments to mitigate the risks related to commodity price fluctuations, such strategies do not fully mitigate commodity price risk. Adverse movements in commodity prices over the terms of the contracts or instruments could decrease the economic benefits we derive from these strategies. Another significant raw material we use is resin, which is a fossil fuel-based product used to make plastic bottles. The prices of diesel and resin are subject to fluctuations based on changes in crude oil and natural gas prices.
For 2017, Additionally, in some cases we expectincur expenses associated with utilizing third-party carriers to deliver our products. The expenses we incur for external freight may vary based on capacity, carrier acceptance rates and other factors. In the first six months of 2018, we experienced higher levels of inflation than expected in external freight, fuel and resin costscosts. We expect the rate headwinds for freight and fuel to increase in comparison to the prior year.

Competitive Environment and Volume Performance
The fluid milk industry remains highly competitive. Volume softness continues to weigh on the broader food industry, and the emphasis of specific retailers on private label within certain segments showed growth in the second quarter of 2017. This created a challenging environmentcontinue for our Company on both volume and brand mix.
In the second quarter of 2017, our total sales volume declined 2.7% across all products from year-ago levels. This decline was in excess of our expectations. As private label performed ahead of the category, our total branded white milk volumes, which include DairyPure® and our other brands, decreased 6.0% year-over-year. This trade down to private label fluid milk from branded products represents a continuing challenge for our business. These decreases were partially offset by a 1.4% increase in our flavored milk volumes versus the second quarter of 2016. Across our other non-fluid milk product categories, year-over-year total volume declines were partially offset by an increase of approximately 8.9% in our ice cream volume performance, primarily due to volumes associated with the Friendly's acquisition.
In the private label milk space, we experienced some customer losses at a higher rate than our expectations. Milk production continues to grow across many areas of the country, creating surplus volume in supply that is changing some recent pricing dynamics in the category. We also continue to face pricing pressures from industry consolidation, large-format and vertical retailers, discounters, and dairy cooperatives and other processors. These factors have resulted in higher than expected fluid milk volume losses that will contribute to a higher year-over-year decline in total volume for 2017. For at least the remainder of 2017,2018. While we expect a total volume decline in the mid-single digits.
We believe the overall retail landscape continues to be challenging, with several factors beyond our control continuing to impact our earnings progression. The downward trend in fluid milk category sales has continued during the first half of 2017. Fluid milk sales data published by the USDA through May 2017 shows a quarter-to-date fluid milk category sales volume decline of 2.9% on a year-over-year basis. In the second quarter of 2017, our share of the fluid milk category decreased by 30 basis points versus the second quarter of the prior year.
We believe that maintaining a competitive cost structure is crucial to the ongoing success of our organization, particularly in view of the competitive environment and volume pressures we are currently facing. During the first quarter of 2017, we re-engineered our commercial function, with a focus on increasing the effectiveness and efficiency of our sales force. We believe it is necessary to replicate this work across the other functions of our business and are targeting an incremental annual cost reduction of $40 million to $50 million in our general and administrative functions. The design phase of this initiative is underway across our organization and we anticipate having plans in place by the end of 2017. Soft volumes, the continued shift to private label and competitive pricing pressures have negated, and will likely continue to negate, some of the impact of our ongoing cost reduction efforts, making it more difficult to deliver these cost savings to the bottom line. Depending on the extent of the decline in our financial results and our financial and cash flow projections, we may incur asset impairment charges in future periods.
Additionally, in March 2016, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. announced that it plans to build a dairy processing plant in Indiana to supply certain Wal-Mart and Sam's Club stores located in the Midwest. We have received preliminary information from Wal-mart regarding the phasing of the transfer of volume into the plant and, based on this data, we expect to lose approximately 90 million to 95 million gallons of private label fluid milk volume in 2018 and 2019. Dialogue between us and Wal-Mart is ongoing, and we are actively taking steps to optimize our network to mitigate these headwinds through usage reductions and other productivity initiatives, we will not be able to fully offset the impact of volume losses inrate increases within the affected region when they occur. However, given the volume degradation we have experienced this year, which is expected to continue through the balance of 2017, we may be unable to sufficiently reduce our costs to mitigate the negative financial impact of the Wal-Mart volume loss. As previously disclosed, we expect to continue to supply Wal-Mart's private label milk for other Wal-Mart stores across the United States pursuant to our existing agreements.year.
Tax Rate
Income tax expensebenefit was recorded at an effective rate of 50.7%23.0% in the first six months of 20172018 compared to income tax expense at a 39.9%50.7% effective tax rate in the first six months of 2016.2017. Our effective tax rate decreased in the first six months of 2018, primarily as a result of the 2017 Tax Act and the one-time tax impacts related to facility closing and reorganization costs

and impairment charges. Changes in our profitability levels and the relative earnings of our business units, as well as changes to federal, state, and foreign tax laws, may cause theour tax rate to change from historical rates.
See the risk factors described in “Part I — Item 1A — Risk Factors” in our 20162017 Annual Report on Form 10-K and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q for a description of various other risks and uncertainties concerning our business.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes in our quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk as set forth in our 20162017 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Controls Evaluation and Related Certifications
We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), referred to herein as “Disclosure Controls”) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. The controls evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"). Based upon our most recent controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that our Disclosure Controls were effective as of June 30, 2017.2018.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the period covered by this quarterly report, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II — Other Information
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no material changes in the Company's risk factors from those set forth in our 20162017 Annual Report on Form 10-K, except as follows:
We may be adversely impacted by a changing customer landscape.
Many of our customers, such as supermarkets, warehouse clubs and food distributors, have experienced industry consolidation in recent years and this consolidation is expected to continue. These consolidations have produced large, more sophisticated customers with increased buying power and negotiating strength, who may seek lower prices or more favorable terms, and they have increased our dependence on key large-format retailers and discount supermarket chains. In addition, some of these customers are vertically integrated and have re-dedicated key shelf-space currently occupied by our branded products for their private label products. We are also facing downward pricing pressure from retailers who sell their own private label products and proprietary brands, such as discount supermarket chains. In addition to the competitive pressures from retail customers, we are facing increased competition from dairy cooperatives and other processors.
The highly competitive retail fluid milk and broader grocery industries are facing additional future uncertainties as a result of the rise of discount supermarket chains and Amazon.com, Inc.’s announcement of its planned acquisition of Whole Foods Market. Discount supermarket chains such as Aldi, which has announced a large expansion of its stores in the U.S., and Lidl, which recently entered the U.S. market, create competitive pressure on retailers to lower prices. These developments may trigger significant changes in pricing competition, and the grocery industry, as well as consumer buying patterns, the effects and timing of which are currently unknown.
Higher levels of price competition and higher resistance to price increases have had a significant impact on our business. If we are unable to respond to these customer dynamics and potential future changes in the customer landscape, our business or financial results could be adversely affected.

The continuing industry shift from branded to private label products could impede our growth rate and profit margin.
We are experiencing a continued shift from branded to private label products. Private label competitors are generally able to sell their products at lower prices because private label products typically have lower marketing costs than their branded competitors. In periods of economic weakness, consumers tend to purchase lower-priced products, including conventional milk, coffee creamers and other private label products, which could reduce sales of our branded products. In addition, in periods of economic disparity and income inequality, certain of our customers may purchase lower-priced products as well as make purchases less frequently. The willingness of consumers to purchase our products will depend upon our ability to offer products providing the right consumer benefits at the right price. Further trade down to lower priced products could adversely affect our sales and the profit margin for our branded products.
This industry shift to private label could be accelerated by the expansion of Aldi and the entry of Lidl in the U.S. market. If our products fail to compete successfully with other branded or private label offerings in the industry, demand for our products and our sales volumes could be negatively impacted.

Litigation could expose us to significant liabilities and may have a material adverse impact on our reputation and business.
Scrutiny of the dairy industry has resulted, and may continue to result, in litigation against us. Such lawsuits are expensive to defend, divert management’s attention and may result in significant judgments or settlements. In some cases, these awards would be trebled by statute and successful plaintiffs are entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees. Depending on its size, such a judgment or settlement could materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition and impair our ability to continue operations. We may not be able to pay such judgment or to post a bond for an appeal, given our financial condition and our available cash resources. In addition, depending on its size, failure to pay such a judgment or failure to post an appeal bond could cause us to breach certain provisions of our credit facilities. In either of these or other circumstances, we may seek a waiver of or amendment to the terms of our credit facilities, but we may not be able to obtain such a waiver or amendment. Failure to obtain such a waiver or amendment would materially and adversely affect our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition and could impair our ability to continue operations. Moreover, such litigation could expose us to negative publicity, which could adversely affect our brands, reputation and/or customer preference for our products.
We were previously a party to a private antitrust lawsuit brought by two plaintiffs that was scheduled for trial beginning March 28, 2017. Prior to trial, the plaintiffs agreed with us to settle the lawsuit. We agreed to pay settlements to the plaintiffs and the parties resolved all outstanding claims in the litigation and agreed to voluntarily dismiss the litigation. The litigation was

dismissed on March 21, 2017 with respect to one plaintiff, and on March 26, 2017 with respect to the other plaintiff. The two plaintiffs initiated the case in 2007 as a putative class action. Although the court refused to certify the case as a class action, the court’s denial of class certification did not act as an adjudication on the merits for the class of purchasers the named plaintiffs proposed to represent. Therefore, we may be subject to subsequent litigation by such purchasers.10-K.
Item 6. Exhibits
99Supplemental Financial Information for Dean Holding Company (filed herewith).
  
101.INS XBRL Instance Document(1).
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document(1).
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document(1).
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document(1).
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document(1).
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document(1).
(1)Filed electronically herewith.


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 DEAN FOODS COMPANY
  
 
/S/ SCOTT K. VOPNI
 Scott K. Vopni
 
Senior Vice President Finance and Chief
Accounting Officer
August 8, 20177, 2018





Exhibit Index

31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).
32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (furnished herewith).
99Supplemental Financial Information for Dean Holding Company (filed herewith).
101.INS XBRL Instance Document(1).
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document(1).
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document(1).
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document(1).
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document(1).
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document(1).

(1)Filed electronically herewith.


45