

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017

or
[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 001-33652


FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Washington		26-0610707
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

201 Wells Avenue South, Renton, Washington		98057
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:		(425) 255-4400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, ~~or a~~ smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and ~~“smaller reporting~~“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer _____	Accelerated filer X	Non-accelerated filer _____
Smaller reporting company ~~____~~_____	Emerging growth company _____

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. _____

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES NO X

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the ~~issuer's~~issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of ~~November~~August 3, ~~2016, 10,931,431~~2017, 11,039,665 shares of the ~~issuer's~~issuer’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, were outstanding.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS



			Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Item 2.	~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	35
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	5554
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	58
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	58
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	58
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	58
	Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	59
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	59
	Item 5.	Other Information	59
	Item 6.	Exhibits	5960
SIGNATURES			61

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Part 1. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements


	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016
Assets
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Cash on hand and in banks	$	5,803		$	5,713		$	7,418		$	5,779
Interest-earning deposits with banks	26,708			99,998			10,996			25,573
Investments available-for-sale, at fair value	133,865			129,565			133,951			129,260
Loans receivable, net of allowance of $11,006 and $9,463	845,930			685,072
Loans receivable, net of allowance of $11,285 and $10,951							861,672			815,043
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") stock, at cost	10,031			6,137			8,902			8,031
Accrued interest receivable	3,378			2,968			3,165			3,147
Deferred tax assets, net	3,053			4,556			2,620			3,142
Other real estate owned ("OREO")	2,331			3,663			1,825			2,331
Premises and equipment, net	18,296			17,707			19,501			18,461
Bank owned life insurance ("BOLI"), net	23,950			23,309			28,721			24,153
Prepaid expenses and other assets	1,353			1,225			2,937			2,664
Total assets	$	1,074,698		$	979,913		$	1,081,708		$	1,037,584

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	33,060		$	29,392		$	35,126		$	33,422
Interest-bearing deposits	659,111			646,015			700,449			684,054
Total deposits	692,171			675,407			735,575			717,476
FHLB Advances	221,500			125,500			191,500			171,500
Advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance	3,752			1,794			2,183			2,259
Accrued interest payable	116			135			286			231
Other liabilities	6,105			6,404			8,650			7,993
Total liabilities	923,644			809,240			938,194			899,459

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding	—			—			—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 90,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 11,898,149 shares at September 30, 2016, and 13,768,814 shares at December 31, 2015	119			138
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 90,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 11,041,865 shares at June 30, 2017, and 10,938,251 shares at December 31, 2016							110			109
Additional paid-in capital	111,066			136,338			98,469			96,852
Retained earnings, substantially restricted	46,569			42,892			51,844			48,981
Accumulated other comprehensive gain (loss), net of tax	71			(1,077		)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax							(984		)	(1,328		)
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") shares	(6,771		)	(7,618		)	(5,925		)	(6,489		)
Total stockholders' equity	151,054			170,673			143,514			138,125
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,074,698		$	979,913		$	1,081,708		$	1,037,584

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Income Statements

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Interest income
Loans, including fees	$	9,967		$	8,698		$	27,742		$	25,932		$	10,352		$	9,048		$	20,379		$	17,775
Investments available-for-sale	792			578			2,224			1,585			887			757			1,732			1,432
Interest-earning deposits	38			67			198			196
Interest-earning deposits with banks													42			47			86			160
Dividends on FHLB stock	45			15			136			20			62			44			144			91
Total interest income	10,842			9,358			30,300			27,733			11,343			9,896			22,341			19,458
Interest expense
Deposits	1,545			1,369			4,469			4,016			1,776			1,441			3,467			2,924
FHLB advances	363			325			933			963
FHLB advances and other borrowings													570			272			1,015			570
Total interest expense	1,908			1,694			5,402			4,979			2,346			1,713			4,482			3,494
Net interest income	8,934			7,664			24,898			22,754			8,997			8,183			17,859			15,964
Provision (recapture of provision) for loan losses	900			(700		)	1,400			(1,300		)
Net interest income after provision (recapture of provision) for loan losses	8,034			8,364			23,498			24,054
Provision for loan losses													100			600			300			500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses													8,897			7,583			17,559			15,464
Noninterest income
Net gain on sale of investments	33			85			33			85			56			—			56			—
BOLI income	251			213			641			369			116			225			317			391
Wealth management revenue	165			41			656			64			307			281			447			491
Other	224			108			531			377			252			202			446			306
Total noninterest income	673			447			1,861			895			731			708			1,266			1,188
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits	3,821			3,488			11,436			10,153			4,409			3,841			8,694			7,615
Occupancy and equipment	467			387			1,463			1,039			579			488			1,059			996
Professional fees	458			472			1,487			1,284			482			561			921			1,029
Data processing	259			176			700			523			519			251			759			441
Loss (Gain) on sale of OREO property, net	—			—			87			(531		)
(Gain) loss on sale of OREO property, net													(5		)	89			(5		)	87
OREO market value adjustments	—			—			257			5			—			—			50			257
OREO related (reimbursements) expenses, net	(11		)	24			(45		)	17
OREO related reimbursements, net													(15		)	(14		)	(25		)	(34		)
Regulatory assessments	82			119			319			351			112			117			208			237
Insurance and bond premiums	86			89			260			270			98			86			197			174
Marketing	67			103			145			190			52			40			100			78
Other general and administrative	25			523			990			1,244			605			613			946			965
Total noninterest expense	5,254			5,381			17,099			14,545			6,836			6,072			12,904			11,845
Income before federal income tax provision	3,453			3,430			8,260			10,404			2,792			2,219			5,921			4,807
Federal income tax provision	847			984			2,389			3,361			924			779			1,709			1,542
Net income	$	2,606		$	2,446		$	5,871		$	7,043		$	1,868		$	1,440		$	4,212		$	3,265
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.22		$	0.18		$	0.47		$	0.51		$	0.18		$	0.12		$	0.41		$	0.26
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.22		$	0.18		$	0.47		$	0.51		$	0.18		$	0.11		$	0.40		$	0.26
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding	11,859,683			13,372,573			12,329,815			13,719,522			10,363,345			12,390,234			10,341,654			12,567,464
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding	12,011,952			13,528,322			12,481,379			13,878,549			10,500,829			12,530,720			10,503,023			12,718,155

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
Net income	$	2,606		$	2,446		$	5,871		$	7,043		$	1,868		$	1,440		$	4,212		$	3,265
Other comprehensive income, before tax:
Gross unrealized holding (losses) gains on investments available-for-sale	(509		)	205			1,800			(65		)
Tax benefit (provision)	178			(72		)	(631		)	22
Gross unrealized holding gains on investments available-for-sale													453			866			829			2,308
Tax provision													(159		)	(303		)	(290		)	(808		)
Reclassification adjustment for net gains realized in income	(33		)	(85		)	(33		)	(85		)	(56		)	—			(56		)	—
Tax provision	12			30			12			30
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax	(352		)	78			$	1,148		$	(98	)
Tax benefit													20			—			20			—
Loss on cash flow hedge													(306		)	—			$	(243	)	$	—
Tax benefit													107			—			$	84		$	—
Other comprehensive income, net of tax													59			563			$	344		$	1,500
Total comprehensive income	$	2,254		$	2,524		$	7,019		$	6,945		$	1,927		$	2,003		$	4,556		$	4,765

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of ~~Stockholders'~~Stockholders’ Equity

(Dollars in thousands except share data)

(Unaudited)


	Shares		Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total Stockholders' Equity			Shares		Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of tax			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balances at December 31, 2014	15,167,381		$	151		$	153,395		$	36,969		$	(357	)	$	(8,746	)	$	181,412
Balances at December 31, 2015																					13,768,814		$	138		$	136,338		$	42,892		$	(1,077	)	$	(7,618	)	$	170,673
Net income																					—		—			—			3,265			—			—			3,265
Other comprehensive income	—		—			—			7,043			(98		)	—			6,945			—		—			—			—			1,500			—			1,500
Exercise of stock options	100,000		1			690			—			—			—			691			55,673		—			244			—			—			—			244
Issuance of common stock - restricted stock awards																					14,052		—			—			—			—			—			—
Compensation related to stock options and restricted stock awards	—		—			330			—			—			—			330			—		—			383			—			—			—			383
Allocation of 84,639 ESOP shares	—		—			185			—			—			846			1,031
Allocation of 56,426 ESOP shares																					—		—			189			—			—			565			754
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(1,067,714	)	(10		)	(12,975		)	—			—			—			(12,985		)	(436,154	)	(4		)	(5,843		)	—			—			—			(5,847		)
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.18 per share)	—		—			—			(2,469		)	—			—			(2,469		)
Balances at September 30, 2015	14,199,667		$	142		$	141,625		$	41,543		$	(455	)	$	(7,900	)	$	174,955
Canceled common stock - restricted stock awards																					(74,478	)	(1		)	1			—			—			—			—
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.12 per share)																					—		—			—			(1,517		)	—			—			(1,517		)
Balances at June 30, 2016																					13,327,907		$	133		$	131,312		$	44,640		$	423		$	(7,053	)	$	169,455


	Shares		Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total Stockholders' Equity			Shares		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of tax			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total Stockholders' Equity
Balances at December 31, 2015	13,768,814		$	138		$	136,338		$	42,892		$	(1,077	)	$	(7,618	)	$	170,673
Balances at December 31, 2016																					10,938,251		$	109	$	96,852		$	48,981		$	(1,328	)	$	(6,489	)	$	138,125
Net income									5,871									5,871			—		—		—			4,212			—			—			4,212
Other comprehensive income	—		—			—			—			1,148			—			1,148			—		—		—			—			344			—			344
Exercise of stock options	63,173		1			317			—			—			—			318			115,880		1		1,132			—			—			—			1,133
Issuance of common stock - restricted stock awards, net	8,752		—			(74		)	—			—			—			(74		)	10,434		—		—			—			—			—			—
Compensation related to stock options and restricted stock awards	—		—			505			—			—			—			505			—		—		401			—			—			—			401
Allocation of 84,639 ESOP shares	—		—			298			—			—			847			1,145
Allocation of 56,428 ESOP shares																					—		—		446			—			—			564			1,010
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(1,868,112	)	(19		)	(26,319		)	—			—			—			(26,338		)	(22,700	)	—		(362		)	—			—			—			(362		)
Canceled common stock - restricted stock awards	(74,478	)	(1		)	1			—			—			—			—
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.18 per share)	—		—			—			(2,194		)	—			—			(2,194		)
Balances at September 30, 2016	11,898,149		$	119		$	111,066		$	46,569		$	71		$	(6,771	)	$	151,054
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.13 per share)																					—		—		—			(1,349		)	—			—			(1,349		)
Balances at June 30, 2017																					11,041,865		$	110	$	98,469		$	51,844		$	(984	)	$	(5,925	)	$	143,514

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	5,871		$	7,043		$	4,212		$	3,265
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision (recapture of provision) for loan losses	1,400			(1,300		)
Provision for loan losses							300			500
OREO market value adjustments	257			5			50			257
Loss (gain) on sale of OREO property, net	87			(531		)
(Gain) loss on sale of OREO property, net							(5		)	87
Gain on sale of investments available-for-sale	(33		)	(85		)	(56		)	—
Loss on sale of premises and equipment							23			—
Depreciation of premises and equipment	797			570			536			524
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investments available-for-sale, net	726			852			331			498
Deferred federal income taxes	884			3,174			336			309
Allocation of ESOP shares	1,145			1,031			1,010			754
Stock compensation expense	505			330			401			383
Change in cash surrender value of BOLI	(641		)	(369		)
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI							(317		)	(391		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Prepaid expenses and other assets	(128		)	217
Net increase in advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance	1,958			1,232
Accrued interest receivable	(410		)	193
Accrued interest payable	(19		)	—
Other liabilities	(299		)	1,357
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets							(516		)	32
Net (decrease) increase in advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance							(76		)	350
Increase in accrued interest receivable							(18		)	(190		)
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable							55			(21		)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities							657			(591		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	12,100			13,719			6,923			5,766
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of OREO properties	988			5,715			461			988
Proceeds from calls and sales of investments available-for-sale	24,921			23,771			4,742			430
Principal repayments on investments available-for-sale	12,375			14,463			5,253			8,203
Purchases of investments available-for-sale	(40,522		)	(44,674		)	(14,188		)	(13,285		)
Net increase in loans receivable	(162,258		)	(9,723		)	(46,929		)	(81,474		)
(Redemption) purchase of FHLB stock	(3,894		)	208
Purchase of FHLB stock							(871		)	(1,494		)
Purchases of premises and equipment	(1,386		)	(1,351		)	(1,599		)	(1,023		)
Surrender of BOLI	10,182			—			—			10,182
Purchase of BOLI	(10,182		)	(20,000		)	(4,251		)	(10,182		)
Net cash used by investing activities	(169,776		)	(31,591		)	(57,382		)	(87,655		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net increase in deposits	16,764			50,940
Net increase (decrease) in deposits							18,099			(15,197		)
Advances from the FHLB	335,000			—			40,000			160,000
Repayments of advances from the FHLB	(239,000		)	—			(20,000		)	(124,000		)
Proceeds from stock options exercises	318			691			1,133			244
Net share settlement of stock awards	(74		)	—
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(26,338		)	(12,985		)	(362		)	(5,847		)
Dividends paid	(2,194		)	(2,469		)	(1,349		)	(1,517		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	84,476			36,177			37,521			13,683

Continued

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	(73,200	)	$	18,305
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents							$	(12,938	)	$	(68,206	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	105,711			104,049			31,352			105,711
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	32,511		$	122,354		$	18,414		$	37,505

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest paid	$	5,421		$	4,979		$	4,427		$	3,515
Federal income taxes paid	2,025			177			1,900			1,175
Noncash items:
Loans transferred to OREO, net of deferred loan fees and allowance for loan losses	$	—		$	141
Change in unrealized loss on investments available for sale	1,767			(150		)
Change in unrealized loss on investments available-for-sale							$	773		$	2,308
Change in gain on cash flow hedge							(243		)	—

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Description of Business

First Financial Northwest, Inc. (“First Financial Northwest”), a Washington corporation, was formed on June 1, 2007 for the purpose of becoming the holding company for First Financial Northwest Bank (“the Bank”) in connection with the conversion from a mutual holding company structure to a stock holding company structure completed on October 9, 2007. First Financial ~~Northwest's~~Northwest’s business activities generally are limited to passive investment activities and oversight of its investment in First Financial Northwest Bank. Accordingly, the information presented in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying data, relates primarily to First Financial Northwest Bank. First Financial Northwest is a bank holding company, having converted from a savings and loan holding company on March 31, 2015, and as a bank holding company is subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. First Financial Northwest Bank is regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions (“DFI”).

First Financial Northwest Bank is headquartered in Renton, Washington, where ~~its main, full service~~it has a full-service retail branch ~~is located. In addition,~~as well as a smaller branch located in a commercial development known as the ~~Bank opened~~“Landing”. Three additional, smaller branches are located in Mill Creek and Edmonds, both in Snohomish County, Washington and the community of Crossroads in Bellevue, in King County, Washington. The Bank has received regulatory approval to open a new branch in Bothell, also in King County, Washington, which is expected to open in the ~~third~~fourth quarter of ~~2015, Edmonds, Washington in the first quarter of 2016, and~~2017. The ~~Landing in Renton, Washington in the third quarter of 2016. The Bank's~~Bank’s primary market area consists of King, Snohomish, Pierce and Kitsap counties, Washington. In addition to these de novo branches, the Bank has received FDIC, DFI and California Department of Business Oversight approvals on the acquisition of four Washington branches located in the Clearview area in Snohomish, the Smokey Point area in Arlington, and Lake Stevens, all in Snohomish County, and Woodinville, in King County. The acquisition is scheduled to close during the third quarter of 2017, subject to customary closing conditions.

The Bank is a portfolio lender, originating one-to-four family residential, multifamily, commercial real estate, construction/land development, business, and consumer loans. Loans are primarily funded by deposits from the general public, supplemented by borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines ~~("FHLB"~~(“FHLB”) and deposits raised in the national brokered deposit market.

As used throughout this report, the terms ~~"we," "our," "us,"~~“we,” “our,” “us,” or the ~~"Company"~~“Company” refer to First Financial Northwest, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary First Financial Northwest Bank, unless the context otherwise requires.

Note 2 - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, as filed with the SEC. In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP have been included. All significant intercompany balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. Operating results for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. In preparing the unaudited consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the allowance for loan and lease losses ~~("ALLL"~~(“ALLL”), the valuation of other real estate owned ~~("OREO"~~(“OREO”) and the underlying collateral of impaired loans, deferred tax assets, and the fair value of financial instruments.

The ~~Company's~~Company’s activities are considered to be a single industry segment for financial reporting purposes. The Company is engaged in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and originating and purchasing loans for its portfolio. Substantially all income is derived from a diverse base of commercial, multifamily, and residential real estate loans, consumer lending activities, and investments.

Certain amounts in the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current unaudited financial statement presentation with no effect on consolidated net income or ~~stockholders'~~stockholders’ equity.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 3 - Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with ~~Customer~~Customers (Topic 606). In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) which postponed the effective date of 2014-09. Subsequently, in March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations. This amendment clarifies that an entity should determine if it is the principal or the agent for each specified good or service promised in a contract with a customer. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity must recognize revenue when it has satisfied a performance obligation of transferring promised goods or services to a customer. The standard is effective for public entities for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017; early adoption is not permitted. The standard allows for full retrospective adoption for all periods presented or modified retrospective adoption to only the most current period presented in the financial statements. The cumulative effect of initially applying the standard is recognized at the date of the initial application. Our primary source of revenue is interest income, which is recognized as it is earned and is deemed to be in compliance with this ASU. With respect to noninterest income, the Company is in its preliminary stages of identifying and evaluating the revenue streams and underlying revenue contracts within the scope of the guidance. The Company is ~~currently evaluating~~expecting to begin developing processes and procedures during 2017 to ensure it is fully compliant with these amendments. To date, the ~~provisions~~Company has not yet identified any significant changes in the timing of revenue recognition when considering the amended accounting guidance; however, the Company’s implementation efforts are ongoing and such assessments may change prior to ~~determine~~ the ~~potential~~January 1, 2018 implementation date. Accordingly, the Company does not expect implementation of this standard to have a material impact ~~the new standard will have~~ on ~~the Company's~~our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, ~~the~~ FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial Instruments--Overall, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. The amendments in this ASU also require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in instrument-specific credit risk. In addition, the ASU eliminates the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The ASU also clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the ~~entity's~~entity’s other deferred tax assets. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted for fiscal years or interim periods that have not yet been issued if adopted at the beginning of the fiscal year. The Company is reviewing our available-for-sale investment portfolio in accordance with the provision of this standard. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 is not expected to have a material impact on the ~~Company's~~Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU No. 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities arising from operating leases. A lessee should recognize a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. A lessee should include payments to be made in an optional period only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend the lease or not to exercise an option to terminate the lease. For a finance lease, interest payments should be recognized separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset in the statement of comprehensive income. For operating leases, the lease cost should be allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application of the amendments in the ASU is permitted. The effect of the adoption will depend on leases at the time of ~~ASU 2016-02~~adoption. Once adopted, we expect to report higher assets and liabilities as a result of including right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to certain banking offices and certain equipment under noncancelable operating lease agreements, however, based on current leases, the adoption is expected to increase our consolidated balance sheets by less than 5% and not ~~expected~~ to have a material impact on ~~the Company's consolidated financial statements.~~our regulatory capital ratios.

~~In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-06,~~ ~~Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments.~~ Topic 815 requires that embedded derivatives be separated from the host contract and accounted for separately as derivatives if certain criteria are met, including the “clearly and closely related” criterion. The amendments in this ASU clarify the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. An entity performing the assessment under the amendments is required to assess the embedded call (put) options solely in accordance with the four-step decision sequence. The amendments in this ASU apply to all entities that are issuers of or investors in debt instruments (or hybrid financial instruments that are determined to have a debt host) with embedded call (put) options. This ASU applies to all entities that are issuers of or investors in debt instruments (or hybrid financial instruments that are determined to have a debt host) with embedded call (put) options. The ASU is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Adoption of ASU 2016-06 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

~~In March 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,~~ ~~Compensation--Stock Compensation (Topic 718).~~ This ASU was issued as part of the FASB's Simplification Initiative and addresses accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences and classification on the statement of cash flows. Under this ASU, all excess tax benefits and deficiencies should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. The tax effect of vested or exercised awards should be reported separately in the period in which they occur. In the statement of cash flows, excess tax benefits should be classified with

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

other income tax cash flows as an operating activity. Entities have the option of accounting for forfeitures when they occur or to estimate the number of awards that are expected to vest. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted in any interim or annual period. First Financial Northwest has adopted ASU 2016-09 with no material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments--Credit Losses (Topic 326). This ASU replaces the existing incurred loss impairment methodology that recognizes credit losses when a probable loss has been incurred with new methodology where loss estimates are based upon lifetime expected credit losses. The amendments in this ASU require a financial asset that is measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The income statement would then reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets as well as changes to the expected credit losses that have taken place during the reporting period. The measurement of expected credit losses will be based on historical information, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that impact the collectability of the reported amount. ~~Available-for-sale~~Available-for-

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

sale securities will bifurcate the fair value mark and establish an allowance for credit losses through the income statement for the credit portion of that mark. The interest portion will continue to be recognized through accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. The change in allowance recognized as a result of adoption will occur through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the ASU is adopted. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is evaluating our current expected loss methodology of our loan and investment portfolios to identify the necessary modifications in accordance with this standard and expects a change in the processes and procedures to calculate the ALLL, including changes in assumptions and estimates to consider expected credit losses over the life of the loan versus the current accounting practice that utilizes the incurred loss model. A valuation adjustment to our ALLL or investment portfolio that is identified in this process will be reflected as a one-time adjustment in equity rather than earnings. We are evaluating the potential impact adoption of this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and expect to shortly begin developing and implementing processes and procedures to ensure we are fully compliant with the amendments at the adoption date. Once adopted, we expect our allowance for loan losses to increase, however, until our evaluation is complete the magnitude of the ~~adoption of ASU 2016-13.~~increase will be unknown.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash ~~Payments.~~Payments. This ASU was to address the appropriate classification of eight specific cash flow issues on the cash flow statement. Debt prepayment costs should be classified as an outflow for financing activities. Settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments divides the interest portion as an outflow for operating activities and the principal portion as an outflow for financing activities. Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination should be classified as outflows for financing and operating activities. Proceeds from the settlement of bank-owned life insurance policies should be classified as inflows from investing activities. Other specific areas are identified in the ASU as to the appropriate classification of the cash inflows or outflows. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted and must be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company is evaluating our current cash flow statement classifications in accordance with the standard. Adoption of ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805). This ASU clarifies the definition of a business to assist in determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) or assets or businesses. The amendments in this ASU provide a screen to determine when a set of assets and activities is not a business, thereby reducing the number of transactions requiring further evaluation. If the screen is not met, the amendments in this ASU further provide a framework to evaluate if the criteria is present to qualify for a business. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. Adoption of ASU 2017-01 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-03, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323). The ASU amends the Codification for SEC staff announcements made at recent Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meetings. The SEC guidance that specifically relates to the Company’s consolidated financial statements was from the September 2016 meeting, where the SEC staff expressed their expectations about the extent of disclosures registrants should make about the effects of the new FASB guidance as well as any amendments issued prior to adoption, in particular on revenue (ASU 2014-09), leases (ASU 2016-02) and credit losses on financial instruments (ASU 2016-13) in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 11.M. Registrants are required to disclose the effect that recently issued accounting standards will have on their financial statements when adopted in a future period. In cases where a registrant cannot reasonably estimate the impact of the adoption, then additional qualitative disclosures should be considered. The ASU incorporates these SEC staff views into Topic 250 and adds references to that guidance in the transition paragraphs of each of the three new standards. The Company has adopted the amendments in this ASU and appropriate disclosures have been included in this Note for each recently issued accounting standard.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles--Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). This ASU simplifies the impairment calculation for subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating the step of comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity will evaluate the carrying amount of a reporting unit to its fair value, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount that the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, not to exceed the amount of goodwill. The income tax effect should be considered for any tax deductible goodwill when measuring the impairment loss. While the Company does not have any goodwill to recognize from any previous transaction, this ASU will apply to the impairment analysis of goodwill recognized in future transactions. The amendments in this ASU are effective for goodwill impairment tests

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for reporting periods after January 1, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2017-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. The ASU shortens the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. The standard will take effect for SEC filers for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The adoption of ASU No. 2017-08 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation--Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The ASU was issued to provide clarity as to when to apply modification accounting when there is a change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. According to this ASU, an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value, vesting conditions, and balance sheet classification of the award is the same after the modification as compared to the original award prior to the modification. The standard is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2017-09 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 4 - Investments

Investments available-for-sale are summarized as follows at the dates indicated:

September 30, 2016
Amortized
Cost Gross
Unrealized
Gains Gross
Unrealized
Losses Fair Value

(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
   Fannie Mae $ 41,456
$ 719
$ (31 ) $ 42,144
   Freddie Mac 18,969
489
—
19,458
   Ginnie Mae 20,006
114
(153 ) 19,967
Municipal bonds 13,237
584
(4 ) 13,817
U.S. Government agencies 14,296
174
(5 ) 14,465
Corporate bonds 24,007
404
(397 ) 24,014
Total $ 131,971
$ 2,484
$ (590 ) $ 133,865

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~



	June 30, 2017
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	46,664	$	164	$	(625	)	$	46,203
Freddie Mac	15,865		87		(72		)	15,880
Ginnie Mae	18,425		28		(559		)	17,894
Municipal bonds	14,137		210		(29		)	14,318
U.S. Government agencies	15,175		90		(127		)	15,138
Corporate bonds	24,504		412		(398		)	24,518
Total	$	134,770	$	991	$	(1,810	)	$	133,951


	December 31, 2015									December 31, 2016
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	50,288	$	260	$	(227	)	$	50,321	$	42,060	$	126	$	(854	)	$	41,332
Freddie Mac	26,011		243		(117		)	26,137		18,013		95		(99		)	18,009
Ginnie Mae	13,802		44		(114		)	13,732		19,133		41		(540		)	18,634
Municipal bonds	11,787		277		—			12,064		13,203		11		(107		)	13,107
U.S. Government agencies	13,541		89		(88		)	13,542		15,937		75		(155		)	15,857
Corporate bonds	14,010		4		(245		)	13,769		22,506		241		(426		)	22,321
Total	$	129,439	$	917	$	(791	)	$	129,565	$	130,852	$	589	$	(2,181	)	$	129,260

The tables below summarize the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by length of time those investment securities have been continuously in an unrealized loss position at the dates ~~indicated. At September 30, 2016, we had two municipal bonds in an unrealized loss position. At December 31, 2015, we had no municipal bonds in an unrealized loss position.~~indicated:

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	September 30, 2016															June 30, 2017
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total					Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss
	(In thousands)															(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	9,194	$	(31	)	$	—	$	—		$	9,194	$	(31	)	$	35,902	$	(625	)	$	—	$	—		$	35,902	$	(625	)
Freddie Mac																10,039		(72		)	—		—			10,039		(72		)
Ginnie Mae	15,877		(153		)	—		—			15,877		(153		)	16,285		(559		)	—		—			16,285		(559		)
Municipal bonds	447		(4		)	—		—			447		(4		)	2,844		(29		)	—		—			2,844		(29		)
U.S. Government agencies	2,002		(2		)	1,617		(3		)	3,619		(5		)	8,447		(127		)	—		—			8,447		(127		)
Corporate bonds	3,883		(117		)	4,720		(280		)	8,603		(397		)	1,499		(2		)	7,103		(396		)	8,602		(398		)
Total	$	31,403	$	(307	)	$	6,337	$	(283	)	$	37,740	$	(590	)	$	75,016	$	(1,414	)	$	7,103	$	(396	)	$	82,119	$	(1,810	)


	December 31, 2015															December 31, 2016
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total					Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss
	(In thousands)															(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	37,593	$	(227	)	$	—	$	—		$	37,593	$	(227	)	$	34,763	$	(854	)	$	—	$	—		$	34,763	$	(854	)
Freddie Mac	12,115		(117		)	—		—			12,115		(117		)	8,343		(99		)	—		—			8,343		(99		)
Ginnie Mae	5,508		(29		)	3,233		(85		)	8,741		(114		)	16,734		(540		)	—		—			16,734		(540		)
Municipal bonds																8,815		(107		)	—		—			8,815		(107		)
U.S. Government agencies	9,605		(88		)	—		—			9,605		(88		)	9,000		(153		)	1,426		(2		)	10,426		(155		)
Corporate bonds	10,263		(245		)	—		—			10,263		(245		)	3,880		(119		)	4,693		(307		)	8,573		(426		)
Total	$	75,084	$	(706	)	$	3,233	$	(85	)	$	78,317	$	(791	)	$	81,535	$	(1,872	)	$	6,119	$	(309	)	$	87,654	$	(2,181	)

On a quarterly basis, management makes an assessment to determine whether there have been any events or economic circumstances to indicate that a security on which there is an unrealized loss is impaired on an other-than-temporary basis. The Company considers many factors including the severity and duration of the impairment, recent events specific to the issuer or industry, and for debt securities, external credit ratings and recent downgrades. Securities on which there is an unrealized loss that is deemed to be an other-than-temporary impairment ~~("OTTI"~~(“OTTI”) are written down to fair value. If the Company intends to sell a debt security, or it is likely that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before recovering its cost basis, the entire impairment loss would be recognized in earnings as an OTTI. If the Company does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not likely that it will be required to sell the debt security but does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

security, only the portion of the impairment loss representing credit losses would be recognized in earnings. The credit loss on a debt security is measured as the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected. Projected cash flows are discounted by the original or current effective interest rate depending on the nature of the debt security being measured for potential OTTI. The remaining impairment related to all other factors, the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and fair value, is recognized as a charge to other comprehensive income (“OCI”). Impairment losses related to all other factors are presented as separate categories within OCI. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company had 1746 securities and 4353 securities in an unrealized loss position, ~~respectively, of which~~respectively. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had five securities and four ~~and three,~~securities, respectively, ~~were~~ in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or more. Management reviewed the financial condition of the entities issuing municipal or corporate bonds at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, and determined that an OTTI charge was not warranted.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments available-for-sale at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Investments not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed investments, are shown separately.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	September 30, 2016				June 30, 2017
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Due within one year	$	515	$	517	$	5,506	$	5,521
Due after one year through five years	8,861		8,919		4,915		4,918
Due after five years through ten years	25,518		25,804		24,652		24,739
Due after ten years	16,646		17,056		18,743		18,796
	51,540		52,296		53,816		53,974
Mortgage-backed investments	80,431		81,569		80,954		79,977
Total	$	131,971	$	133,865	$	134,770	$	133,951

Under Washington state law, in order to participate in the public funds program the Company is required to pledge eligible securities as collateral in an amount equal to 50% of the public deposits ~~held.~~held less the FDIC insured amount. Investment securities with market values of ~~$24.0~~$21.7 million and ~~$17.4~~$22.6 million were pledged as collateral for public deposits at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, both of which exceeded the collateral requirements established by the Washington Public Deposit Protection Commission.

For the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we had calls and sales on investment securities of ~~$24.5~~$4.7 million ~~and $24.9 million, respectively,~~ generating a net gain of ~~$33,000.~~$56,000. For the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, we had calls ~~and sales of~~on investment securities of ~~$22.1 million~~$385,000, and ~~$23.7 million,~~$430,000, respectively, ~~generating a net~~with no gain or loss. There were no sales of ~~$85,000.~~investments during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

1314

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 5 - Loans Receivable

Loans receivable are summarized as follows at the dates indicated:

September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(In thousands)
One-to-four family residential:
Permanent owner occupied $ 148,304
$ 147,229
Permanent non-owner occupied 107,601
106,543
255,905
253,772
Multifamily:
Permanent 135,414
122,747
Construction ⁽¹⁾
49,325
21,115
184,739
143,862
Commercial real estate:
Permanent 329,204
244,211
Land ⁽²⁾
27,916
8,290
357,120
252,501
Construction/land development:
One-to-four family residential 62,120
52,233
Multifamily 49,471
25,551
Land development 3,793
8,768
115,384
86,552

Business 8,023
7,604
Consumer 6,526
6,979
Total loans 927,697
751,270

Less:
Loans in process ("LIP") 68,492
53,854
Deferred loan fees, net 2,269
2,881
Allowance for loan and lease losses ("ALLL") 11,006
9,463
Loans receivable, net $ 845,930
$ 685,072

^{______________________}

⁽¹⁾ Construction/land development excludes construction loans that will convert to permanent loans. The Company considers these loans to be "rollovers" in that one loan is originated for both the construction loan and permanent financing. These loans are classified according to the underlying collateral.

⁽²⁾~~Includes raw land or buildable lots where the Company does not intend to finance the construction.~~



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)
One-to-four family residential:
Permanent owner occupied	$	137,816	$	137,834
Permanent non-owner occupied	118,816		111,601
	256,632		249,435

Multifamily	125,884		123,250

Commercial real estate	317,218		303,694

Construction/land:
One-to-four family residential	76,404		67,842
Multifamily	123,497		111,051
Commercial	1,100		—
Land	39,012		30,055
	240,013		208,948

Business	15,206		7,938
Consumer	9,031		6,922
Total loans	963,984		900,187

Less:
Loans in process ("LIP")	88,475		72,026
Deferred loan fees, net	2,552		2,167
Allowance for loan and lease losses ("ALLL")	11,285		10,951
Loans receivable, net	$	861,672	$	815,043

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, loans totaling ~~$434.6~~$448.2 million were pledged to secure borrowings from the FHLB of Des Moines compared to ~~$365.1~~$472.1 million at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

The Company has issued loans to officers and directors on the same terms as comparable loans to unrelated parties. The outstanding balance of these loans was $65,000 at September 30, 2016 and $118,000 at December 31, 2015.

ALLL. The Company maintains an ALLL as a reserve against probable and inherent risk of losses in its loan portfolios. The ALLL is comprised of a general reserve component for loans evaluated collectively for loss and a specific reserve component for loans evaluated individually. When an issue is identified and it is determined that the loan needs to be classified as nonperforming and/or impaired, an evaluation of the discounted expected cash flows is done and an appraisal may be obtained on the collateral.

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Based on this evaluation, additional provision for loan loss or charge-offs is recorded prior to the end of the financial reporting period.

The following tables summarize changes in the ALLL and loan portfolio by loan type and impairment method at the dates and for the periods shown:

At or For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
One-to-Four
Family
Residential Multifamily Commercial
Real Estate Construction/
Land Development Business Consumer Total
(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance $ 2,747
$ 1,421
$ 4,021
$ 1,403
$ 217
$ 325
$ 10,134
   Charge-offs —
—
—
—
—
(28 ) (28 )
   Recoveries —
—
—
—
—
—
—
   Provision (recapture) (60 ) 130
641
178
25
(14 ) 900
Ending balance $ 2,687
$ 1,551
$ 4,662
$ 1,581
$ 242
$ 283
$ 11,006

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


																		At or For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
																		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate			Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer			Total
																		(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance																		$	2,542	$	1,188	$	4,027		$	2,791	$	311	$	299		$	11,158
Charge-offs																		—		—		—			—		—		—			—
Recoveries																		27		—		—			—		—		—			27
Provision (recapture)																		58		43		(294		)	151		146		(4		)	100
Ending balance																		$	2,627	$	1,231	$	3,733		$	2,942	$	457	$	295		$	11,285

	At or For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016																	At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land Development		Business		Consumer			Total			One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate			Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)																	(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	3,028		$	1,298	$	3,542	$	941	$	229	$	425		$	9,463		$	2,551	$	1,199	$	3,893		$	2,792	$	237	$	279		$	10,951
Charge-offs	—			—		—		—		—		(47		)	(47		)	—		—		—			—		—		—			—
Recoveries	85			—		104		—		—		1			190			33		—		—			—		—		1			34
Provision (recapture)	(426		)	253		1,016		640		13		(96		)	1,400			43		32		(160		)	150		220		15			300
Ending balance	$	2,687		$	1,551	$	4,662	$	1,581	$	242	$	283		$	11,006		$	2,627	$	1,231	$	3,733		$	2,942	$	457	$	295		$	11,285

ALLL by category:
General reserve	$	2,369		$	1,551	$	4,474	$	1,581	$	242	$	283		$	10,500		$	2,446	$	1,231	$	3,710		$	2,942	$	457	$	295		$	11,081
Specific reserve	318			—		188		—		—		—			506			181		—		23			—		—		—			204

Loans: ⁽¹⁾
Total loans	$	255,905		$	159,083	$	357,120	$	72,545	$	8,023	$	6,530		$	859,206		$	256,632	$	125,884	$	316,675		$	152,082	$	15,206	$	9,031		$	875,510
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment ⁽²⁾	227,650			157,511		352,203		72,545		8,023		6,400			824,332			236,951		124,738		313,015			152,082		15,206		8,933			850,925
Loans individually evaluated for impairment ⁽³⁾	28,255			1,572		4,917		—		—		130			34,874			19,681		1,146		3,660			—		—		98			24,585

____________

⁽¹⁾Net of LIP.

⁽²⁾Loans collectively evaluated for general reserves.

⁽³⁾Loans individually evaluated for specific reserves.

1516

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

At or For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
One-to-Four
Family
Residential Multifamily Commercial
Real Estate Construction/
Land Development Business Consumer Total
(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance $ 3,536
$ 1,187
$ 4,436
$ 819
$ 189
$ 436
$ 10,603
   Charge-offs (2 ) —
—
—
—
(20 ) (22 )
   Recoveries 217
—
48
—
—
—
265
   Provision (recapture) (245 ) 15
(579 ) 76
21
12
(700 )
Ending balance $ 3,506
$ 1,202
$ 3,905
$ 895
$ 210
$ 428
$ 10,146


																				At or For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
																				One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business			Consumer			Total
																				(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance																				$	2,840		$	1,184	$	3,497	$	1,392	$	197		$	361		$	9,471
Charge-offs																				—			—		—		—		—			—			—
Recoveries																				63			—		—		—		—			—			63
Provision (recapture)																				(156		)	10		274		488		20			(36		)	600
Ending balance																				$	2,747		$	1,194	$	3,771	$	1,880	$	217		$	325		$	10,134

	At or For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015																			At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily			Commercial Real Estate			Construction/ Land Development		Business		Consumer			Total			One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business			Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)																			(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	3,694		$	1,646		$	4,597		$	355	$	47	$	152		$	10,491		$	3,028		$	1,193	$	3,395	$	1,193	$	229		$	425		$	9,463
Charge-offs	(27		)	(281		)	—			—		—		(54		)	(362		)	—			—		—		—		—			(19		)	(19		)
Recoveries	908			—			105			—		3		301			1,317			85			—		104		—		—			1			190
Provision (recapture)	(1,069		)	(163		)	(797		)	540		160		29			(1,300		)	(366		)	1		272		687		(12		)	(82		)	500
Ending balance	$	3,506		$	1,202		$	3,905		$	895	$	210	$	428		$	10,146		$	2,747		$	1,194	$	3,771	$	1,880	$	217		$	325		$	10,134

ALLL by category:
General reserve	$	2,945		$	1,199		$	3,665		$	895	$	210	$	388		$	9,302		$	2,346		$	1,194	$	3,664	$	1,824	$	217		$	325		$	9,570
Specific reserve	561			3			240			—		—		40			844			401			—		107		56		—			—			564

Loans: ⁽¹⁾
Total loans	255,536			123,752			253,687			41,073		6,973		6,655			687,676			$	251,732		$	132,189	$	285,449	$	95,209	$	7,208		$	6,333		$	778,120
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment ⁽²⁾	217,660			120,467			245,947			41,073		6,973		6,444			638,564			220,597			130,610		281,002		94,715		7,208			6,226			740,358
Loans individually evaluated for impairment ⁽³⁾	37,876			3,285			7,740			—		—		211			49,112			31,135			1,579		4,447		494		—			107			37,762

_____________

⁽¹⁾ Net of LIP.

⁽²⁾ Loans collectively evaluated for general reserves.

⁽³⁾ Loans individually evaluated for specific reserves.

1617

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Past Due Loans. Loans are considered past due if a scheduled principal or interest payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, total~~2017, past due loans ~~comprised 0.02%~~were 0.01% of total loans receivable, net of LIP. In comparison, past due loans were 0.06% of total loans receivable, net of LIP ~~as compared to 0.18%~~ at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. The following tables represent a summary of the aging of loans by type at the dates indicated:


	Loans Past Due as of September 30, 2016												Loans Past Due as of June 30, 2017
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}		30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	—	$	—	$	169	$	169	$	148,135	$	148,304	$	85	$	—	$	—	$	85	$	137,731	$	137,816
Non-owner occupied	—		—		—		—		107,601		107,601		—		—		—		—		118,816		118,816
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		159,086		159,086		—		—		—		—		125,884		125,884
Commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		357,120		357,120		—		—		—		—		316,675		316,675
Construction/land development	—		—		—		—		72,546		72,546
Construction/land													—		—		—		—		152,082		152,082
Total real estate	—		—		169		169		844,488		844,657		85		—		—		85		851,188		851,273
Business	—		—		—		—		8,023		8,023		—		—		—		—		15,206		15,206
Consumer	12		—		25		37		6,489		6,526		—		—		—		—		9,031		9,031
Total loans	$	12	$	—	$	194	$	206	$	859,000	$	859,206	$	85	$	—	$	—	$	85	$	875,425	$	875,510

________________

⁽¹⁾ There were no loans 90 days and greater past due and still accruing interest at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017.

⁽²⁾ Net of LIP.


	Loans Past Due as of December 31, 2015												Loans Past Due as of December 31, 2016
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}		30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	678	$	483	$	—	$	1,161	$	146,068	$	147,229	$	304	$	—	$	169	$	473	$	137,361	$	137,834
Non-owner occupied	—		—		—		—		106,543		106,543		—		—		—		—		111,601		111,601
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		133,388		133,388		—		—		—		—		123,250		123,250
Commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		252,501		252,501		—		—		—		—		303,694		303,694
Construction/land development	—		—		—		—		43,172		43,172
Construction/land													—		—		—		—		136,922		136,922
Total real estate	678		483		—		1,161		681,672		682,833		304		—		169		473		812,828		813,301
Business	—		—		—		—		7,604		7,604		—		—		—		—		7,938		7,938
Consumer	—		78		19		97		6,882		6,979		—		—		—		—		6,922		6,922
Total loans	$	678	$	561	$	19	$	1,258	$	696,158	$	697,416	$	304	$	—	$	169	$	473	$	827,688	$	828,161

_________________

⁽¹⁾ There were no loans 90 days and greater past due and still accruing interest at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

⁽²⁾ Net of LIP.

1718

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Nonaccrual Loans. The following table is a summary of nonaccrual loans by loan type at the dates indicated:


	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
One-to-four family residential	$	986	$	996	$	528	$	798
Consumer	87		89		55		60
Total nonaccrual loans	$	1,073	$	1,085	$	583	$	858

During the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, interest income that would have been recognized had these nonaccrual loans been performing in accordance with their original terms was ~~$13,000~~$9,000 and ~~$40,000,~~$18,000, respectively. For the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, foregone interest on nonaccrual loans was ~~$31,000~~$13,000 and ~~$87,000,~~$27,000, respectively.

The following tables summarize the loan portfolio by type and payment status at the dates indicated:


	September 30, 2016														June 30, 2017
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction / Land Development		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction / Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Performing ⁽²⁾	$	254,919	$	159,086	$	357,120	$	72,546	$	8,023	$	6,439	$	858,133	$	256,104	$	125,884	$	316,675	$	152,082	$	15,206	$	8,976	$	874,927
Nonperforming ⁽³⁾	986		—		—		—		—		87		1,073		528		—		—		—		—		55		583
Total loans	$	255,905	$	159,086	$	357,120	$	72,546	$	8,023	$	6,526	$	859,206	$	256,632	$	125,884	$	316,675	$	152,082	$	15,206	$	9,031	$	875,510

_____________


⁽¹⁾	Net of LIP.


⁽²⁾	There were ~~$147.3~~$137.3 million of owner-occupied one-to-four family residential loans and ~~$107.6~~$118.8 million of non-owner occupied one-to-four family residential loans classified as performing.


⁽³⁾	~~There were $986,000~~The $528,000 of ~~owner-occupied one-to-four family residential loans and no non-owner occupied~~ one-to-four family residential loans classified as ~~nonperforming.~~nonperforming are all owner-occupied.


	December 31, 2015														December 31, 2016
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land Development		Business		Consumer		Total⁽¹⁾		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Performing ⁽²⁾	$	252,776	$	133,388	$	252,501	$	43,172	$	7,604	$	6,890	$	696,331	$	248,637	$	123,250	$	303,694	$	136,922	$	7,938	$	6,862	$	827,303
Nonperforming ⁽³⁾	996		—		—		—		—		89		1,085		798		—		—		—		—		60		858
Total loans	$	253,772	$	133,388	$	252,501	$	43,172	$	7,604	$	6,979	$	697,416	$	249,435	$	123,250	$	303,694	$	136,922	$	7,938	$	6,922	$	828,161

_____________

⁽¹⁾Net of LIP.

⁽²⁾There were ~~$146.2~~$137.0 million of owner-occupied one-to-four family residential loans and ~~$106.5~~$111.6 million of non-owner occupied one-to-four family residential loans classified as performing.

⁽³⁾~~There were $996,000~~The $798,000 of ~~owner-occupied one-to-four family residential loans and no non-owner occupied~~ one-to-four family residential loans classified as ~~nonperforming.~~nonperforming are all owner-occupied.

Impaired Loans. A loan is considered impaired when we have determined that we may be unable to collect payments of principal or interest when due under the terms of the original loan document. There were no funds committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans at either ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, or December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

1819

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following tables present a summary of loans individually evaluated for impairment by loan type at the dates indicated:


	September 30, 2016						June 30, 2017
	Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance ⁽²⁾		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance ⁽²⁾		Related Allowance
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	2,414	$	2,738			$	1,982	$	2,265	$	—
Non-owner occupied	19,179		19,197				12,664		12,679		—
Multifamily	1,572		1,572				1,146		1,146		—
Commercial real estate	1,347		1,425				2,913		2,990		—
Consumer	130		212				98		145		—
Total	24,642		25,144		—		18,803		19,225		—
Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	1,902		1,972		57		1,673		1,720		45
Non-owner occupied	4,760		4,781		261		3,362		3,383		136
Commercial real estate	3,570		3,570		188		747		747		23
Total	10,232		10,323		506		5,782		5,850		204
Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	4,316		4,710		57		3,655		3,985		45
Non-owner occupied	23,939		23,978		261		16,026		16,062		136
Multifamily	1,572		1,572		—		1,146		1,146		—
Commercial real estate	4,917		4,995		188		3,660		3,737		23
Consumer	130		212		—		98		145		—
Total	$	34,874	$	35,467	$	506	$	24,585	$	25,075	$	204

_________________

⁽¹⁾ Represents the loan balance less charge-offs.

⁽²⁾ Contractual loan principal balance.

1920

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2015						December 31, 2016
	Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance⁽²⁾		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance⁽²⁾		Related Allowance
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	3,169	$	3,441	$	—	$	2,216	$	2,475	$	—
Non-owner occupied	23,285		23,310		—		16,634		16,652		—
Multifamily	415		414		—		1,564		1,564		—
Commercial real estate	2,675		2,857		—		2,952		3,012		—
Consumer	132		183		—		103		148		—
Total	29,676		30,205		—		23,469		23,851		—
Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	2,120		2,189		85		1,896		1,965		51
Non-owner occupied	7,521		7,573		427		4,326		4,347		151
Multifamily	1,180		1,180		3
Commercial real estate	2,716		2,717		178		755		755		26
Consumer	76		76		39
Construction/land							495		495		81
Total	13,613		13,735		732		7,472		7,562		309
Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	5,289		5,630		85		4,112		4,440		51
Non-owner occupied	30,806		30,883		427		20,960		20,999		151
Multifamily	1,595		1,594		3		1,564		1,564		—
Commercial real estate	5,391		5,574		178		3,707		3,767		26
Construction/land							495		495		81
Consumer	208		259		39		103		148		—
Total	$	43,289	$	43,940	$	732	$	30,941	$	31,413	$	309

_________________

⁽¹⁾ Represents the loan balance less charge-offs.

⁽²⁾ Contractual loan principal balance.

2021

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following ~~tables present~~table presents the average recorded investment in loans individually evaluated for impairment and the interest income recognized for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015:~~2016:

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Average Recorded Investment
Interest Income Recognized
Average Recorded Investment
Interest Income Recognized
(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:

   One-to-four family residential:

      Owner occupied $ 2,434
$ 57
$ 2,679
$ 123
      Non-owner occupied 20,208
296
21,234
878
Multifamily 1,576
26
1,189
79
Commercial real estate 1,796
31
2,089
77
Consumer 119
3
123
8
Total 26,133
413
27,314
1,165

Loans with an allowance:

   One-to-four family residential:

      Owner occupied 2,003
28
2,042
78
      Non-owner occupied 5,050
76
5,874
202
Multifamily —
—
393
—
Commercial real estate 3,133
57
2,994
166
Consumer —
—
25
—
Total 10,186
161
11,328
446

Total impaired loans:

   One-to-four family residential:

      Owner occupied 4,437
85
4,721
201
      Non-owner occupied 25,258
372
27,108
1,080
Multifamily 1,576
26
1,582
79
Commercial real estate 4,929
88
5,083
243
Consumer 119
3
148
8
Total $ 36,319
$ 574
$ 38,642
$ 1,611

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized Average Recorded Investment Interest Income Recognized
(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
   One-to-four family residential:
      Owner occupied $ 3,114
$ 49
$ 3,215
$ 131
      Non-owner occupied 25,142
361
26,835
1,123
Multifamily 2,101
8
1,471
23
Commercial real estate 4,757
85
4,650
269
Consumer 125
2
121
3
Total 35,239
505
36,292
1,549

Loans with an allowance:
   One-to-four family residential:
      Owner occupied 2,131
12
2,240
89
      Non-owner occupied 7,772
115
8,084
345
Multifamily 1,187
19
1,677
58
Commercial real estate 3,199
41
3,883
104
Consumer 77
—
78
2
Total 14,366
187
15,962
598

Total impaired loans:
   One-to-four family residential:
      Owner occupied 5,245
61
5,455
220
      Non-owner occupied 32,914
476
34,919
1,468
Multifamily 3,288
27
3,148
81
Commercial real estate 7,956
126
8,533
373
Consumer 202
2
199
5
Total $ 49,605
$ 692
$ 52,254
$ 2,147

~~Troubled Debt Restructurings.~~ Certain loan modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructured loans ("TDRs"). At September 30, 2016, the TDR portfolio totaled $34.0 million, of which two loans totaling $182,000 were on nonaccrual status because they had previously not performed in accordance with the terms of their restructure. As of September 30, 2016, they were both current, however they will remain on nonaccrual status until they have performed for six months and are expected to continue to perform. At December 31, 2015, the TDR portfolio totaled $42.3 million, of which one loan of $131,000 was not performing in accordance with the terms of its restructure and was on nonaccrual status.

~~The following tables present loans that were modified as TDRs within the periods indicated and their recorded investment both before and after the modification:~~



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017				Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	1,997	$	30	$	2,070	$	61
Non-owner occupied	13,510		181		14,551		374
Multifamily	1,149		19		1,287		37
Commercial real estate	2,923		48		2,932		101
Consumer	99		2		100		4
Total	19,678		280		20,940		577

Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	1,781		20		1,819		43
Non-owner occupied	3,721		39		3,922		81
Commercial real estate	749		10		751		21
Construction/land	—		—		165		—
Total	6,251		69		6,657		145

Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	3,778		50		3,889		104
Non-owner occupied	17,231		220		18,473		455
Multifamily	1,149		19		1,287		37
Commercial real estate	3,672		58		3,683		122
Construction/land	—		—		165		—
Consumer	99		2		100		4
Total	$	25,929	$	349	$	27,597	$	722

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
(Dollars in thousands)
One-to-four family
residential:
Principal and interest with interest rate concession 1
$ 316
$ 316

15
$ 3,490
$ 3,490
Advancement of maturity date 5
1,119
1,119

5
1,119
1,119
Commercial real estate:

Interest-only payments with interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date —
—
—

1
495
495
Advancement of maturity date 1
434
434

1
434
434
Total 7
$ 1,869
$ 1,869

22
$ 5,538
$ 5,538



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016				Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	2,516	$	17	$	2,733	$	66
Non-owner occupied	22,084		286		22,484		605
Multifamily	1,584		26		1,194		53
Commercial real estate	2,251		35		2,392		76
Consumer	110		1		117		3
Total	28,545		365		28,920		803

Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	2,107		27		2,111		56
Non-owner occupied	5,496		62		6,171		139
Multifamily	—		—		393		—
Commercial real estate	2,207		34		2,211		70
Construction/land	495		5		495		9
Consumer	38		—		50		—
Total	10,343		128		11,431		274

Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	4,623		44		4,844		122
Non-owner occupied	27,580		348		28,655		744
Multifamily	1,584		26		1,587		53
Commercial real estate	4,458		69		4,603		146
Construction/land	495		5		495		9
Consumer	148		1		167		3
Total	$	38,888	$	493	$	40,351	$	1,077

Troubled Debt Restructurings. Certain loan modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructured loans (“TDRs”). At June 30, 2017, the TDR portfolio totaled $24.1 million, of which one loan of $106,000 was on nonaccrual status because it had previously not performed in accordance with the terms of its restructure. As of June 30, 2017, it was current, however it will remain on nonaccrual status until it has performed for six months and is expected to continue to perform. At December 31, 2016, the TDR portfolio totaled $30.3 million, of which one loan of $174,000 was not performing in accordance with the terms of its restructure and was on nonaccrual status.

The following tables present loans that were modified as TDRs during the periods indicated and their recorded investment both before and after the modification:

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
(Dollars in thousands)
One-to-four family
residential:
Interest-only payments with interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date —
$ —
$ —
6
$ 1,439
$ 1,439
Principal and interest with interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date 2
$ 426
$ 426
2
$ 426
$ 426
Advancement of maturity date —
—
—
2
248
248
Commercial real estate:
Principal and interest with interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date 1
775
775
1
775
775
Interest-only payments with interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date —
—
—
1
496
496
Advancement of maturity date —
—
—
2
866
866
Interest-only payments with advancement of maturity date —
—
—
1
2,004
2,004
Total 3
$ 1,201
$ 1,201
15
$ 6,254
$ 6,254



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017			Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment	Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)			(Dollars in thousands)
One-to-four family residential:
Principal and interest with interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date	7	1,968	1,968	7	1,968	1,968
Total	7	1,968	1,968	7	1,968	1,968



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016					Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
	Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
One-to-four family residential:
Principal and interest with interest rate concession	16	$	3,155	$	3,155	17	$	3,711	$	3,711
Commercial real estate:
Interest-only payments with interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date	—	—		—		1	495		495
Total	16	$	3,155	$	3,155	18	$	4,206	$	4,206

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, the Company had no commitments to extend additional credit to borrowers whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs. All TDRs are also classified as impaired loans and are included in the loans individually evaluated for impairment as part of the calculation of the ALLL.

The TDRs that occurred during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016, were all on existing TDRs and ~~2015,~~ included ~~granting the borrower~~extensions of existing interest rate concessions and advancing ~~the~~ maturity ~~date~~dates for a period of time ranging from one to three years. No loans accounted for as TDRs were charged-off to the ALLL for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015.~~2016.

TDRs that default after they have been modified are typically evaluated individually on a collateral basis. Any additional impairment is charged to the ALLL. For the three and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, and ~~the three and nine months ended September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, no loans that had been modified in the previous 12 months defaulted. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, one commercial loan of $495,000 that had been modified with an interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date within the previous 12 months missed one payment, but was current as of September 30, 2016.

Credit Quality Indicators. The Company utilizes a nine-category risk rating system and assigns a risk rating for all credit exposures. The risk rating system is designed to define the basic characteristics and identify risk elements of each credit extension. Credits risk rated 1 through 5 are considered to be “pass” credits. Pass credits include assets, such as cash secured loans with funds on deposit with the Bank, where there is virtually no credit risk. Pass credits also include credits that are on the ~~Company's~~Company’s watch list, where the borrower exhibits potential weaknesses, which may, if not checked or corrected, negatively affect the borrower’s

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

financial capacity and threaten their ability to fulfill debt obligations in the future. Credits classified as special mention are risk rated 6 and possess weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. Special mention assets do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification in the substandard, doubtful or loss categories. Substandard credits are risk rated

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

7. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and payment capacity of the borrower or of any collateral pledged.

Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as doubtful are risk rated 8 and have all the weaknesses inherent in those credits classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values. Assets classified as loss are risk rated 9 and are considered uncollectible and cannot be justified as a viable asset for the Company. There were no loans classified as doubtful or loss at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

The following tables represent a summary of loans by type and risk category at the dates indicated:


	September 30, 2016														June 30, 2017
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land Development		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Risk Rating:
Pass	$	251,394	$	159,086	$	352,873	$	72,546	$	8,023	$	6,251	$	850,173	$	253,095	$	125,884	$	313,856	$	152,082	$	15,206	$	8,788	$	868,911
Special mention	2,971		—		3,752		—		—		188		6,911		2,460		—		2,819		—		—		188		5,467
Substandard	1,540		—		495		—		—		87		2,122		1,077		—		—		—		—		55		1,132
Total loans	$	255,905	$	159,086	$	357,120	$	72,546	$	8,023	$	6,526	$	859,206	$	256,632	$	125,884	$	316,675	$	152,082	$	15,206	$	9,031	$	875,510

_____________

⁽¹⁾ Net of LIP.


	December 31, 2015														December 31, 2016
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction / Land Development		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction / Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Risk Rating:
Pass	$	247,239	$	133,388	$	248,196	$	43,172	$	7,604	$	6,702	$	686,301	$	245,237	$	123,250	$	300,655	$	136,427	$	7,938	$	6,674	$	820,181
Special mention	3,840		—		3,809		—		—		188		7,837		2,847		—		3,039		—		—		188		6,074
Substandard	2,693		—		496		—		—		89		3,278		1,351		—		—		495		—		60		1,906
Total loans	$	253,772	$	133,388	$	252,501	$	43,172	$	7,604	$	6,979	$	697,416	$	249,435	$	123,250	$	303,694	$	136,922	$	7,938	$	6,922	$	828,161

_____________

⁽¹⁾ Net of LIP.

Note 6 - Other Real Estate Owned

OREO includes properties acquired by the Company through foreclosure and deed in lieu of foreclosure. The following table is a summary of OREO activity during the periods shown:

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016		2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
	(In thousands)											(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	2,331	$	4,416		$	3,663		$	9,283		$	2,281		$	3,405		$	2,331		$	3,663
Loans transferred to OREO	—		—			—			141
Gross proceeds from sale of OREO	—		(181		)	(988		)	(5,715		)	(461		)	(985		)	(461		)	(988		)
(Loss) gain on sale of OREO	—		—			(87		)	531
Gain on sale of OREO												5			(89		)	5			(87		)
Market value adjustments	—		—			(257		)	(5		)	—			—			(50		)	(257		)
Balance at end of period	$	2,331	$	4,235		$	2,331		$	4,235		$	1,825		$	2,331		$	1,825		$	2,331

~~There~~During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, one OREO property sold for $461,000, generating a gain on sale of $5,000. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, there were no ~~sales of~~market value adjustments taken on OREO ~~properties~~properties. However, during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016. During~~March 31, 2017, a $50,000 market value adjustment was recognized on the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016, two OREO properties plus one parcel~~property that was subsequently sold during the second quarter of ~~a multi-parcel property with a combined book value of $1.1 million were sold, generating a net loss of $87,000.~~2017. OREO at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 consisted of ~~$2.3~~$1.8 million in commercial real estate properties. At June 30, 2017, there were no loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.

Note 7 - Fair Value

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

The Company determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair values. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect its estimate for market assumptions.

Valuation inputs refer to the assumptions market participants would use in pricing a given asset or liability using one of the three valuation techniques. Inputs can be observable or unobservable. Observable inputs are those assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the particular asset or liability. These inputs are based on market data and are obtained from an independent source. Unobservable inputs are assumptions based on the ~~Company's~~Company’s own information or estimate of assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are based on the best and most current information available on the measurement date.

All inputs, whether observable or unobservable, are ranked in accordance with a prescribed fair value hierarchy:

Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.

Level 3 - Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable.

The tables below present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis (there were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 recurring measurements) at ~~the dates indicated:~~June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2016								Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2017
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Investments available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	42,144	$	—	$	42,144	$	—	$	46,203	$	—	$	46,203	$	—
Freddie Mac	19,458		—		19,458		—		15,880		—		15,880		—
Ginnie Mae	19,967		—		19,967		—		17,894		—		17,894		—
Municipal bonds	13,817		—		13,817		—		14,318		—		14,318		—
U.S. Government agencies	14,465		—		14,465		—		15,138		—		15,138		—
Corporate bonds	24,014		—		24,014		—		24,518		—		24,518		—
Total	$	133,865	$	—	$	133,865	$	—
Total available-for-sale investments									133,951		—		133,951		—
Derivative fair value asset									1,090		—		1,090		—
									$	135,041	$	—	$	135,041	$	—


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Investments available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	50,321	$	—	$	50,321	$	—	$	41,332	$	—	$	41,332	$	—
Freddie Mac	26,137		—		26,137		—		18,009		—		18,009		—
Ginnie Mae	13,732		—		13,732		—		18,634		—		18,634		—
Municipal bonds	12,064		—		12,064		—		13,107		—		13,107		—
U.S. Government agencies	13,542		—		13,542		—		15,857		—		15,857		—
Corporate bonds	13,769		—		13,769		—		22,321		—		22,321		—
Total	$	129,565	$	—	$	129,565	$	—
Total available-for-sale investments									129,260		—		129,260		—
Derivative fair value asset									1,333		—		1,333		—
									$	130,593	$	—	$	130,593	$	—

The estimated fair value of Level 2 investments is based on quoted prices for similar investments in active markets, identical or similar investments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.

The tables below present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015.~~2016:

Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2016
Fair Value
Measurements Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1) Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2) Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(In thousands)
Impaired loans (included in loans
receivable, net) ⁽¹⁾
$ 34,368
$ —
$ —
$ 34,368
OREO 2,331
—
—
2,331
Total $ 36,699
$ —
$ —
$ 36,699

~~_____________~~


⁽¹⁾	~~Total fair value of impaired loans is net of $506,000 of specific reserves on performing TDRs.~~

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)



	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2017
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans (included in loans receivable, net) ⁽¹⁾	$	24,381	$	—	$	—	$	24,381
OREO	1,825		—		—		1,825
Total	$	26,206	$	—	$	—	$	26,206

_____________


⁽¹⁾	Total fair value of impaired loans is net of $204,000 of specific reserves on performing TDRs.


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Impaired loans (included in loans receivable, net) ⁽¹⁾	$	42,557	$	—	$	—	$	42,557	$	30,632	$	—	$	—	$	30,632
OREO	3,663		—		—		3,663		2,331		—		—		2,331
Total	$	46,220	$	—	$	—	$	46,220	$	32,963	$	—	$	—	$	32,963

_____________

⁽¹⁾ Total fair value of impaired loans is net of ~~$732,000~~$309,000 of specific reserves on performing TDRs.

The fair value of impaired loans is calculated using the collateral value method or on a discounted cash flow basis. Inputs used in the collateral value method include appraised values, less estimated costs to sell. Some of these inputs may not be observable in the marketplace. Appraised values may be discounted based on ~~management's~~management’s knowledge of the marketplace, subsequent changes in market conditions, or ~~management's~~management’s knowledge of the borrower.

OREO properties are measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third party appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level 3 classification. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.

The following ~~table presents~~tables present quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015.~~2016:

September 30, 2016

June 30, 2017

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input(s)

Range (Weighted Average)

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input(s)

Range (Weighted Average)

(Dollars in thousands)

Impaired Loans

34,368

Market approach

Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions

0 - 7.8% (0.1%)

24,381

Market approach

Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions

0.0% (0.0%)

OREO

2,331

Market approach

Appraised value less selling costs

0.0% (0.0%)

1,825

Market approach

Appraised value less selling costs

0.0% (0.0%)

December 31, 2015
Fair Value Valuation Technique Unobservable Input(s) Range (Weighted Average)
(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired Loans $ 42,557
Market approach Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions 0% - 2.1%
(0.3%)

OREO $ 3,663
Market approach Appraised value less selling costs 0% - 13.6%
(1.0%)

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)



	December 31, 2016
	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input(s)	Range (Weighted Average)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired Loans	$	30,632	Market approach	Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions	0.0% (0.0%)

OREO	$	2,331	Market approach	Appraised value less selling costs	0.0% (0.0%)

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows at the dates indicated:


	September 30, 2016										June 30, 2017
			Estimated		Fair Value Measurements Using:								Estimated		Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)										(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash on hand and in banks	$	5,803	$	5,803	$	5,803	$	—	$	—	$	7,418	$	7,418	$	7,418	$	—	$	—
Interest-earning deposits	26,708		26,708		26,708		—		—
Interest-earning deposits with banks											10,996		10,996		10,996		—		—
Investments available-for-sale	133,865		133,865		—		133,865		—		133,951		133,951		—		133,951		—
Loans receivable, net	845,930		862,708		—		—		862,708		861,672		864,725		—		—		864,725
FHLB stock	10,031		10,031		—		10,031		—		8,902		8,902		—		8,902		—
Accrued interest receivable	3,378		3,378		—		3,378		—		3,165		3,165		—		3,165		—
Derivative fair value asset											1,090		1,090		—		1,090		—

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	266,161		266,161		266,161		—		—		315,059		315,059		315,059		—		—
Certificates of deposit, retail	350,522		353,130		—		353,130		—		345,028		345,058		—		345,058		—
Certificates of deposit, brokered	75,488		75,599		—		75,599		—		75,488		75,644		—		75,644		—
Advances from the FHLB	221,500		221,788		—		221,788		—		191,500		188,939		—		188,939		—
Accrued interest payable	116		116		—		116		—		286		286		—		286		—

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2015										December 31, 2016
			Estimated		Fair Value Measurements Using:								Estimated		Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)										(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash on hand and in banks	$	5,713	$	5,713	$	5,713	$	—	$	—	$	5,779	$	5,779	$	5,779	$	—	$	—
Interest-earning deposits	99,998		99,998		99,998		—		—
Interest-earning deposits with banks											25,573		25,573		25,573		—		—
Investments available-for-sale	129,565		129,565		—		129,565		—		129,260		129,260		—		129,260		—
Loans receivable, net	685,072		693,480		—		—		693,480		815,043		818,054		—		—		818,054
FHLB stock	6,137		6,137		—		6,137		—		8,031		8,031		—		8,031		—
Accrued interest receivable	2,968		2,968		—		2,968		—		3,147		3,147		—		3,147		—
Derivative fair value asset											1,333		1,333		—		1,333		—

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	285,416		285,416		285,416		—		—		285,335		285,335		285,335		—		—
Certificates of deposit, retail	323,840		324,135		—		324,135		—		356,653		356,723		—		356,723		—
Certificates of deposit, brokered	66,151		66,947		—		66,947		—		75,488		75,431		—		75,431		—
Advances from the FHLB	125,500		125,466		—		125,466		—		171,500		170,221		—		170,221		—
Accrued interest payable	135		135		—		135		—		231		231		—		231		—

Fair value estimates, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the ~~Company's~~Company’s financial instruments:

Financial instruments with book value equal to fair value: The fair value of financial instruments that are short-term or reprice frequently and that have little or no risk are considered to have a fair value equal to book value. These instruments include cash on hand and in banks, interest-earning deposits with banks, FHLB stock, accrued interest receivable and accrued interest ~~payable, and investment transactions~~ payable. FHLB stock is not publicly-traded, however it may be

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

redeemed on a dollar-for-dollar basis, for any amount the Bank is not required to hold, subject to the FHLB’s discretion. The fair value is therefore equal to the book value.

Investments available-for-sale: The fair value of all investments, excluding FHLB stock, was based upon quoted market prices for similar investments in active markets, identical or similar investments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.

Loans receivable: For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. The fair value of fixed-rate loans is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, utilizing interest rates that would be offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. As a result of current market conditions, cash flow estimates have been further discounted to include a credit factor. The fair value of nonperforming loans is estimated using the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Derivatives: The fair value of derivatives is based on dealer quotes, pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques for which the determination of fair value may require significant management judgment or estimation.

Liabilities: The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as statement savings, ~~NOW~~interest-bearing checking and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using current interest rates for certificates of deposit with similar remaining maturities. The fair value of FHLB advances is estimated based on discounting the future cash flows using current interest rates for debt with similar remaining maturities.

Off balance sheet commitments: No fair value adjustment is necessary for commitments made to extend credit, which represents commitments for loan originations or for outstanding commitments to purchase loans. These commitments

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

are at variable rates, are for loans with terms of less than one year and have interest rates which approximate prevailing market rates, or are set at the time of loan closing.

Fair value estimates are based on existing balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business. The fair value has not been estimated for assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments.

Note 8 - Derivatives

The Company uses a derivative financial instrument, which qualifies as a cash flow hedge, to manage the risk of changes in future cash flows due to interest rate fluctuations. The hedge instrument is a $50.0 million three-month FHLB advance that will be renewed every three months at the fixed interest rate at that time. The agreement has a five-year term and stipulates that the counterparty will pay the Company interest at three-month LIBOR and the Company will pay fixed interest of 1.34% on the $50.0 million notional amount. The Company pays or receives the net interest amount quarterly and includes this amount as part of interest expense on the Consolidated Income Statement.

Quarterly, the effectiveness evaluation is based upon the fluctuation of the interest the Company pays to the FHLB for the hedge instrument as compared to the three-month LIBOR interest received from the counterparty. At June 30, 2017, the fair value of the cash flow hedge of $1.1 million was reported with other assets. The tax effected amount of $709,000 was included in Other Comprehensive Income. There were no amounts recorded in the Consolidated Income Statement for the quarters ended June 30, 2017 or 2016 related to ineffectiveness.

Fair value for this derivative instrument, which generally changes as a result of changes in the level of market interest rates, is estimated based on dealer quotes and secondary market sources.

The following table presents the fair value of this derivative instrument as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:



	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value at June 30, 2017		Fair Value at December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)
Interest rate swap on FHLB debt designated as cash flow hedge	Other Assets	$	1,090	$	1,333

Total derivatives		$	1,090	$	1,333

The following table presents the effect of this derivative instrument on the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the quarters ended June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:



	Balance Sheet Location	Amount Recognized in OCI at June 30, 2017		Amount Recognized in OCI at December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)
Interest rate swap on FHLB debt designated as cash flow hedge	Other assets	$	707	$	866

Note 89 - Stock-Based Compensation

In June 2016, First Financial ~~Northwest's~~Northwest’s shareholders approved the First Financial Northwest, Inc. 2016 Equity Incentive Plan ("(“2016 ~~Plan"~~Plan”). This plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options ~~("ISO"~~(“ISO”), non-qualified stock options ~~("NQSO"~~(“NQSO”), restricted stock and restricted stock units until June 2026. The 2016 Plan established 1,400,000 shares available to grant with a maximum of 400,000 of these shares available to grant as restricted stock awards. Each share issued as a restricted stock award counts as two shares towards the total shares available to award.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Under the 2016 Plan, the vesting date for each option award or restricted stock award is determined by an award committee and specified in the award agreement. In the case of restricted stock awards granted in lieu of cash payments of ~~director's~~directors’ fees, the grant date is used as the vesting ~~date.~~date unless the award agreement provides otherwise.

As a result of the approval of the 2016 Plan, the First Financial Northwest, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan ("(“2008 ~~Plan"~~Plan”) was frozen and no additional awards will be made. As of June 30, 2016, there were 611,756 available stock options and 74,478 available restricted stock awards that are no longer available to be awarded under the 2008 Plan. Restricted stock awards and stock options that were granted under the 2008 Plan will continue to vest and be available for exercise, subject to the 2008 Plan provisions. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, there were ~~1,371,896~~1,351,028 total shares available for grant under the 2016 Plan, including ~~385,948~~375,514 shares available to be granted as restricted stock.

For the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, total compensation expense for the Plan was ~~$302,000,~~$291,000 and ~~$111,000,~~$290,000, respectively, and the related income tax benefit was ~~$106,000~~$102,000 and ~~$39,000,~~$101,500, respectively.

For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015,~~2016, total compensation expense for the Plan was ~~$505,000~~$401,000, and ~~$330,000,~~$383,000, respectively, and the related income tax benefit was ~~$177,000~~$141,000 and ~~$116,000,~~$134,000, respectively.

Included in the above compensation for the ~~nine~~three and six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 and 2016, ~~director's~~directors’ compensation of $180,000 was recognized as a result of the awarding and vesting of restricted shares in lieu of cash payments of ~~directors'~~directors’ fees, with a related income tax benefit of $63,000.

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Stock Options

Under the 2008 Plan, stock option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of First Financial ~~Northwest's~~Northwest’s common stock at the grant date. These option awards have a vesting period of five years, with 20% vesting on the anniversary date of each grant date, and a contractual life of 10 years. Any unexercised stock options ~~will expire~~expires ten years after the grant date, or sooner in the event of the award recipient’s death, disability or termination of service with the Company orand the Bank.

Under the 2016 Plan, the exercise price and vesting period for stock options are determined by the award committee and specified in the award agreement, however, the exercise price shall not be less than the fair market value of a share as of the grant date. Any unexercised stock option will expire 10 years after the award date or sooner in the event of the award ~~recipient's~~recipient’s death, disability, retirement, or termination of service.

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes model that uses the following assumptions. The dividend yield is based on the current quarterly dividend in effect at the time of the grant. Historical employment data is used to estimate the forfeiture rate. The historical volatility of the ~~Company's~~Company’s stock price over a specified period of time is used for the expected volatility assumption. First Financial Northwest bases the risk-free interest rate on the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity Indices in effect on the date of the grant. First Financial Northwest elected to use the “Share-Based Payments” method permitted by the SEC to calculate the expected term. This method uses the vesting term of an option along with the contractual term, setting the expected life at the midpoint.

AUnder certain conditions, a cashless exercise of vested stock options may occur by the option holder surrendering the number of options valued at the current stock price at the time of exercise to cover the total cost to exercise. The surrendered options are canceled and are unavailable for reissue.

A summary of the Company’s stock option plan awards and activity for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, follows:

3132

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Shares Weighted-Average Exercise Price Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at July 1, 2016 726,320

$ 10.12

Granted —

Exercised (7,500 )
9.78

Canceled —

Forfeited or expired —

Outstanding at September 30, 2016 718,820

10.12

4.56
2,908,520
Vested and expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture
rate over the vesting term 713,090

10.12

4.53
2,891,228
Exercisable at September 30, 2016 527,820

9.75

3.40
2,332,110

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Shares Weighted-Average Exercise Price Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2016 884,260

$ 10.11

Granted —

Exercised (63,173 )
9.78

Canceled (82,267 )

Forfeited or expired (20,000 )
12.05

Outstanding at September 30, 2016 718,820

10.12

4.56
2,908,520
Vested and expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture
rate over the vesting term
713,090

10.12

4.53
2,891,228
Exercisable at September 30, 2016 527,820

9.75

3.40
2,332,110



	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at April 1, 2017	506,280		$	10.27
Granted	—
Exercised	(18,340	)	9.78
Outstanding at June 30, 2017	487,940		10.29		5.14	2,851,319
Vested and expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term	482,870		10.28		5.12	2,826,214
Exercisable at June 30, 2017	318,940		9.81		4.14	2,014,489


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2017	603,820		$	10.19
Granted	—
Exercised	(115,880	)	9.78
Outstanding at June 30, 2017	487,940		10.29		5.14	2,851,319
Vested and expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term	482,870		10.28		5.12	2,826,214
Exercisable at June 30, 2017	318,940		9.81		4.14	2,014,489

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, there was ~~$657,470~~$458,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the 2008 Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of ~~2.95~~2.41 years. There were no stock options granted during the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 under either the 2008 Plan or 2016 Plan.

Restricted Stock Awards

The 2008 Plan authorized the grant of restricted stock awards to directors, advisory directors, officers and employees. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the stock at the grant date. The restricted stock awards’ fair value is equal to the stock price on the grant date. Shares awarded under this plan as restricted stock vest ratably over a five-year period beginning at the grant date with 20% vesting on the anniversary date of each grant date.

The 2016 Plan authorizes the grant of restricted stock awards subject to vesting periods or terms as defined by the award committee and specified in the award agreement. Restricted stock awards granted in lieu of cash payments for ~~directors'~~directors’ fees are subject to immediate vesting on the grant date unless the award agreement provides otherwise.

A summary of changes in nonvested restricted stock awards for the three and ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, follows:

3233

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Shares
Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at July 1, 2016 47,800
$ 8.95
Granted —

Vested (9,700 ) 8.97
Canceled (5,300 ) 8.97
Forfeited —

Nonvested at September 30, 2016 32,800
8.94
Expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term 31,816

For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Shares Weighted-Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2016 47,800
$ 8.95
Granted 14,052
12.81
Vested (23,752 ) 10.83
Canceled (5,300 ) 8.97
Forfeited —

Nonvested at September 30, 2016 32,800
8.94
Expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term 31,816



	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at April 1, 2017	26,400		$	9.13
Granted	10,434
Vested	(10,434	)	17.25
Nonvested at June 30, 2017	26,400		9.13
Expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term	25,608


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2017	26,400		$	9.13
Granted	10,434
Vested	(10,434	)	17.25
Nonvested at June 30, 2017	26,400		9.13
Expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term	25,608

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, there was ~~$222,433~~$87,000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested shares granted as restricted stock awards. The cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of ~~1.33~~0.75 years.

~~Note 9 - Federal Income Taxes~~

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. These calculations are based on many complex factors including estimates of the timing of reversals of temporary differences, the interpretation of federal income tax laws, and a determination of the differences between the tax and the financial reporting basis of assets and liabilities. Actual results could differ significantly from the estimates and interpretations used in determining the current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities.

Under GAAP, a valuation allowance is required to be recognized if it is “more likely than not” that a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. Our policy is to evaluate our deferred tax assets on a quarterly basis and record a valuation allowance for our deferred tax asset if we do not have sufficient positive evidence indicating that it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax asset will be realized. At September 30, 2016, it was determined that the full deferred tax asset would be realized in future periods and no valuation allowance was required.

~~Our effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2016 was 30.1%~~. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, we recognized a $213,000 tax benefit as a result of a new tax regulation that allowed the Company to utilize a capital loss carryforward that was expected to be foregone at December 31, 2015. We recognized an additional tax benefit as a result of the

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

exercise by officers and directors of certain non-qualified stock options. Estimated compensation expense is accrued to the deferred tax asset over the vesting period of the options. When these options were exercised, the actual stock price for our common stock was higher than previously estimated, resulting in an increase to actual compensation expense above the amount previously accrued and recognition of a tax benefit. Partially offsetting these benefits, we surrendered a $10.2 million BOLI policy during the second quarter of 2016, and used the proceeds to purchase a new BOLI policy. The increase in cash surrender value during the life of the policy was previously excluded from taxable income, however due to the early surrender of the policy, we recognized additional taxable noninterest income of $182,000 and incurred a 10% penalty of $18,000.

The Company has prepared federal tax returns through December 31, 2015, at which time the Company had an alternative minimum tax credit carryforward totaling $1.6 million which has no expiration date.

Note 10 - Earnings Per Share

Per the provisions of FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, nonvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and are included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. ESOP shares are considered outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share when the shares are committed to be released. Certain of the ~~Company's~~Company’s nonvested restricted stock awards qualify as participating securities.

Net income is allocated between the common stock and participating securities pursuant to the two-class method, based on their rights to receive dividends, participate in earnings, or absorb losses. Basic earnings per common shares is computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding participating nonvested restricted shares.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the components used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated:

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016
	(Dollars in thousands, except share data)												(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Net income	$	2,606		$	2,446		$	5,871		$	7,043		$	1,868		$	1,440		$	4,212		$	3,265
Less: Earnings allocated to participating securities	(7		)	(9		)	$	(16	)	$	(26	)	(4		)	(5		)	$	(10	)	$	(11	)
Earnings allocated to common shareholders	$	2,599		$	2,437		$	5,855		$	7,017		$	1,864		$	1,435		$	4,202		$	3,254

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	11,859,683			13,372,573			12,329,815			13,719,522			10,363,345			12,390,234			10,341,654			12,567,464
Dilutive stock options	131,919			134,187			132,711			135,475			122,192			120,704			147,147			132,619
Dilutive restricted stock grants	20,350			21,562			18,853			23,552			15,292			19,782			14,222			18,072
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	12,011,952			13,528,322			12,481,379			13,878,549			10,500,829			12,530,720			10,503,023			12,718,155

Basic earnings per share	$	0.22		$	0.18		$	0.47		$	0.51		$	0.18		$	0.12		$	0.41		$	0.26
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.22		$	0.18		$	0.47		$	0.51		$	0.18		$	0.11		$	0.40		$	0.26

Potential dilutive shares are excluded from the computation of earnings per share if their effect is anti-dilutive. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017, there were 20,000 options to purchase shares of common stock that were omitted from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, there were no anti-dilutive shares omitted from the computation. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, options to purchase an additional 60,000 shares of common stock were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the incremental shares under the treasury stock method of calculation resulted in them being anti-dilutive. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, options to purchase an additional 165,000 and 225,000 shares of common stock, respectively, were excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

~~Note 11 - Subsequent Events~~

~~Stock Repurchase Plan~~

On September 9, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock, or 12.5% of the Company's outstanding shares. This plan expires on March 27, 2017. Subsequent to September 30, 2016, we repurchased 996,277 shares at an average price of $14.47 per share, bringing the total shares repurchased under this plan as of November 3, 2016 to 1,133,777 at an average price of $14.42 per share. On October 10, 2016, Joseph Stilwell filed an amendment to his Schedule 13D indicating that he and his affiliated entities had sold their entire holdings of stock in the Company.

~~Cash Flow Hedge~~

On October 25, 2016, the Bank entered into a Cash Flow Hedge agreement with a $50,000,000 notional, pay-fixed, receive floating swap. Under the terms of the swap, the Bank will pay a fixed rate of 1.34% for five years and receive three month LIBOR. Concurrently, the Bank borrowed $50,000,000 from the FHLB of Des Moines utilizing a three month fixed rate advance. The payment and interest reset dates will be the 25th of January, April, July, and October each year, at which time the three month LIBOR rate used for the swap and the three month FHLB advance will both reprice to the rates in effect at those dates. The Bank entered into the Cash Flow Hedge agreement as management determined this was a cost effective way to manage interest rate risk.

Item 2. ~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, are based on certain assumptions and are generally identified by use of the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about, among other things, expectations of the business environment in which we operate, projections of future performance or financial items, perceived opportunities in the market, potential future credit experience, and statements regarding our mission and vision. These forward-looking statements are based upon current management expectations and may, therefore, involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those suggested, expressed, or implied by forward-looking statements as a result of a wide variety or range of factors including, but not limited to: the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs, that may be affected by deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets, and may lead to increased losses and nonperforming assets in our loan portfolio, and may result in our allowance for loan losses not being adequate to cover actual losses, and require us to materially increase our reserves; changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas; changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short and long term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources; fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas; results of examinations of us by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and our bank subsidiary by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Division of Banks (“DFI”) or other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such regulatory authority may initiate an enforcement action against the Company or the Bank which could require us to increase our reserve for loan losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position, affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits, or impose additional requirements or restrictions on us, any of which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; our ability to pay dividends on our common stock; our ability to attract and retain deposits; increases in premiums for deposit insurance; our ability to control operating costs and expenses; the use of estimates in determining the fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in

significant declines in valuation; difficulties in reducing risk associated with the loans on our balance sheet; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our work force and potential associated charges; computer systems on which we depend could fail or experience a security breach; our ability to retain key members of our senior management team; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; our ability to implement our branch expansion strategy; our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel we have acquired or may in the future acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames and any goodwill charges related ~~thereto;~~thereto, including our pending branch purchase; our ability to manage loan delinquency rates; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; increased competitive pressures among financial services companies; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business including changes in regulatory policies and principles, including the interpretation of regulatory capital or other

rules, including as a result of Basel III; the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the ~~"Dodd~~“Dodd Frank ~~Act"~~Act”) and the implementing regulations; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions; adverse changes in the securities markets; inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board, including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; the economic impact of war or any terrorist activities; other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations; pricing, products and services; and other risks detailed in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015 ("2015~~2016 (“2016 Form ~~10-K"~~10-K”). Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this Form 10-Q and in the other public reports and statements we make may turn out to be wrong because of the inaccurate assumptions we might make, because of the factors illustrated above or because of other factors that we cannot foresee. Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on our behalf. Therefore, these factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no responsibility to update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Overview

First Financial Northwest Bank ("(“the ~~Bank"~~Bank”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Financial Northwest, Inc. ("(“the ~~Company"~~Company”) and, as such, comprises substantially all of the activity for ~~First Financial Northwest.~~the Company. First Financial Northwest Bank was a community-based savings bank until February 4, 2016, when the Bank converted to a Washington chartered commercial bank reflecting the commercial banking services it now provides to its customers. ~~Our full-service banking office in Renton, Washington~~The Bank primarily serves ~~primarily~~ King, ~~County, and also~~ Pierce, Snohomish, and Kitsap ~~counties. Additional~~counties, Washington, through its full-service banking office and smaller branch in Renton, Washington, and additional branches ~~opened~~located in Mill Creek, ~~Washington~~Edmonds, and the community of Crossroads in ~~September 2015, Edmonds, Washington in March 2016, and~~Bellevue, Washington. The ~~Landing in Renton, Washington in July 2016. Improved~~addition of branch locations, together with improved technology from the conversion to a new core data processor in ~~August~~ 2015 ~~allows~~have allowed the Bank to better meet the needs of our customers ~~as we seek to~~and broaden the demographics of our customer base. The Bank has received regulatory approval to open a new branch office at The Junction, a new, mixed use development in Bothell, Washington in the fourth quarter of 2017. In addition, the Bank has received FDIC, DFI and California Department of Business Oversight approvals for the acquisition of four Washington branches located in the Clearview area in Snohomish, the Smokey Point area in Arlington, Lake Stevens, and Woodinville, Washington. The acquisition is scheduled to close during the third quarter of 2017, subject to customary closing conditions.

The Bank’s business consists predominantly of attracting deposits from the general public, combined with borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines ~~("FHLB"~~(“FHLB”) and raising funds in the wholesale market, then utilizing these funds to originate one-to-four family residential, multifamily, commercial real estate, construction/land, ~~development,~~ business, and consumer loans. Our current business strategy emphasizes commercial real estate, construction, one-to-four family residential, and multifamily lending. With the current low interest rate environment, we are not aggressively pursuing longer term assets, but rather are focused on financing shorter term loans, in particular construction/land loans. Recently, improvements in the economy, employment rates, stronger real estate prices, and a general lack of new housing inventory in certain areas in the Puget Sound region have ~~led to~~resulted in our significantly increasing originations of construction loans for properties located in our market area. We anticipate that ~~construction~~construction/land lending will continue to be a strong element of our total loan portfolio in future periods. We will continue to take a disciplined approach in our ~~construction and~~ construction/land ~~development~~ lending by concentrating our efforts on ~~smaller~~ one-to-four family residential loans to builders known to us. On a limited basis, we also will provide multifamily loans to developers with proven success in this type of construction. In addition, we ~~are~~have geographically ~~expanding~~expanded our loan portfolio through loan purchases or loan participations of commercial and multifamily real estate loans that are outside of our primary market area. We ~~recently hired~~have a loan officer with extensive experience in California to further support our efforts to geographically diversify our loan portfolio through direct loan originations, loan participations, or loan purchases.

In support of our strategic growth plan, the Bank is seeking niche expansion opportunities. We have employees with the language and experience to meet the specific deposit and lending needs of the Chinese/American community, including real estate developers involved in the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program. In addition, we are developinghas developed a national line of business to originate and service aircraft loans. These loans ~~will be~~are collateralized by new or used, single-engine piston aircraft to light jets for business or personal ~~use. Our~~use which have demonstrated an acceptable valuation history under industry accepted valuation resources. As we grow our aircraft loan portfolio, we anticipate these loans will ~~initially~~ range in size from $250,000 to ~~$4.0~~$8.0 million ~~and the primary focus of our~~with underwriting guidelines ~~will be~~primarily based on the asset value of the collateral ~~rather than~~with secondary emphasis placed on the ability of the borrower to repay the loan. However, the underwriting importance of the asset value compared to the borrowers’ financial condition may fluctuate, based on the relative strengths or weaknesses of each of these underwriting components. We ~~expect to begin~~began originating aircraft loans ~~in this area~~ in the fourth quarter of 2016. At June 30, 2017, our business loans included $6.2 million in fixed and adjustable rate aircraft loans.

Our primary source of revenue is interest income, which is the income that we earn on our loans and investments. Interest expense is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is the difference between interest income and interest expense. Changes in levels of interest rates affect interest income and interest expense differently and, thus, impacts our net interest income.

An offset to net interest income is the provision for loan losses which is required to establish the allowance for loan and lease losses ~~("ALLL"~~(“ALLL”) at a level that adequately provides for probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio. As our loan portfolio increases, or due to an increase for probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio, our ALLL may increase, resulting in a decrease to net interest income. Improvements in loan risk ratings, increases in property values, or receipt of recoveries of amounts previously charged off may partially or fully offset any increase to ALLL due to loan growth or an increase in probable loan losses.

Noninterest income is generated from various loan or deposit fees, increases in the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance ~~("BOLI"~~(“BOLI”), and revenue earned on our wealth management brokerage ~~relationship.~~services. This income is increased or partially offset by any net gain or loss on sales of investment securities.

Our noninterest expenses consist primarily of salaries and employee benefits, professional fees, regulatory assessments, occupancy and equipment, and other general and administrative expenses. Salaries and employee benefits consist primarily of the salaries and wages paid to our employees, payroll taxes, expenses for retirement, and other employee benefits. OREO-related expenses consist primarily of maintenance and costs of utilities for the OREO inventory, market valuation adjustments, build-out expenses, gains and losses from OREO sales, legal fees, real estate taxes, and insurance related to the properties included in the OREO inventory. Professional fees include legal services, auditing and accounting services, computer support services, and other professional services in support of strategic plans. Occupancy and equipment expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of buildings and equipment, consist primarily of real estate taxes, depreciation expenses, maintenance, and costs of utilities. Also included in noninterest expense are changes to the ~~Company's~~Company’s unfunded commitment reserve which are reflected in general and administrative expenses. This unfunded commitment reserve expense can vary significantly each quarter, based on the amount believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities, and reflects changes in the amounts that the Company has committed to fund but has not yet disbursed.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition because they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and our financial results. These policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective, and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or by using different assumptions. These policies govern the ALLL, the valuation of OREO, and the calculation of deferred taxes, fair values, and other-than-temporary impairments on the market value of ~~investments.~~investments and derivatives. These policies and estimates are described in further detail in Part II, Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies with the ~~2015~~2016 Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes in the ~~Company's~~Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates as compared to the disclosure contained in the ~~2015~~2016 Form 10-K.

Comparison of Financial Condition at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016

Total assets were $1.1 billion at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, an increase of ~~9.7%~~4.3%, from ~~$979.9 million~~$1.0 billion at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. The following table details the ~~$94.8~~$44.1 million net change in the composition of our assets at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 from December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.


	Balance at September 30, 2016		Change from December 31, 2015			Percent Change		Balance at June 30, 2017		Change from December 31, 2016			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)							(Dollars in thousands)
Cash on hand and in banks	$	5,803	$	90		1.6	%	$	7,418	$	1,639		28.4	%
Interest-earning deposits	26,708		(73,290		)	(73.3	)
Interest-earning deposits with banks								10,996		(14,577		)	(57.0	)
Investments available-for-sale, at fair value	133,865		4,300			3.3		133,951		4,691			3.6
Loans receivable, net	845,930		160,858			23.5		861,672		46,629			5.7
Premises and equipment, net	18,296		589			3.3		19,501		1,040			5.6
FHLB stock, at cost	10,031		3,894			63.5		8,902		871			10.8
Accrued interest receivable	3,378		410			13.8		3,165		18			0.6
Deferred tax assets, net	3,053		(1,503		)	(33.0	)	2,620		(522		)	(16.6	)
OREO	2,331		(1,332		)	(36.4	)	1,825		(506		)	(21.7	)
BOLI, net	23,950		641			2.8		28,721		4,568			18.9
Prepaid expenses and other assets	1,353		128			10.4		2,937		273			10.2
Total assets	$	1,074,698	$	94,785		9.7	%	$	1,081,708	$	44,124		4.3	%

Interest-earning ~~deposits.~~deposits with banks. Our interest-earning deposits with banks, consisting primarily of funds held at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, decreased by ~~$73.3~~$14.6 million from December 31, ~~2015~~2016 to ~~September~~June 30, 2017. Loan payoffs received late in the fourth quarter of 2016 ~~as lower yielding cash was~~were temporarily held in our Federal Reserve Bank account, then partially used to ~~partially~~ fund new loan originations in the ~~growth in higher yielding loans receivable.~~six months ended June 30, 2017.

Investments available-for-sale. Our investments available-for-sale portfolio increased by ~~$4.3~~$4.7 million during the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016.~~2017. During this period, we purchased ~~$40.5~~$14.2 million of securities ~~that~~which included four mortgage-backed securities, two subordinated debt instruments issued by well capitalized financial institutions located in southern California in the amounts of $5.0 million each, increasing our corporate bonds by $10.0 million. These notes carry fixed interest rates of 6.0% and 6.5% for the initial five years, then convert to floating rate instruments that reprice quarterly for the remainder of their ten year terms. In addition, we purchased tax exempt municipal bonds, mortgage backed securities, and one ~~bond issued by the U.S. Small Business Administration with a combined yield at purchase of 3.07%. Partially funding these purchases, we~~tax-exempt municipal bond. We also sold ~~$24.5~~$4.7 million of securities which included two mortgage-backed securities and a portion of a subordinated debt security. The mortgage-backed securities were sold in favor of a collateralized mortgage ~~backed securities with~~obligation security which met our investment objectives while the portion of the subordinated debt security was sold in order to allow us the ability to diversify our holdings of bank subordinated debt notes through reinvestment of the proceeds received in other issuers. In addition, the Bank had partial calls of $5,000 on a ~~combined yield of 0.19%.~~taxable municipal security and $21,000 on a U.S. government agency security. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, corporate bonds issued by financial institutions represented ~~$24.0~~$24.5 million, or ~~17.9%~~18.3% of our investments available-for-sale and municipal bonds represented ~~$13.8~~$14.1 million, or ~~10.3%~~10.7% of our investments available-for-sale. These purchases were part of our investment portfolio restructuring strategy to transition our investment portfolio to securities with longer maturity periods, higher yields, and primarily fixed rates in order to enhance our interest income.

~~In addition to the purchase and call activity, we received principal repayments of $12.4 million on our investments available-for-sale during the first nine months of 2016.~~ The net unrealized ~~gain~~loss of our investments available-for-sale had a pre-tax ~~increase~~decrease of ~~$1.2 million~~$829,000 during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017 as a result of a net improvement in the market value of the underlying securities in our portfolio.

The effective duration of the investments available-for-sale at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, was ~~3.6%~~3.5% as compared to ~~3.2%~~4.0% at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. Effective duration is a measure that attempts to quantify the anticipated percentage change in the value of an investment security (or portfolio) in the event of a 100 basis point change in market yields. Since the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s portfolio includes securities with embedded options (including call options on bonds and prepayment options on mortgage-backed securities), management believes that effective duration is an appropriate metric to use as a tool when analyzing the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s investment securities portfolio, as effective duration incorporates assumptions relating to such embedded options, including changes in cash flow assumptions as interest rates change.

Loans receivable. Net loans receivable increased ~~$160.9~~$46.6 million during the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016. During this time period, we supplemented our loan originations by purchasing $58.3~~2017 to $861.7 million ~~in performing residential and non-residential commercial real estate and multifamily loans from other financial institutions. The loans were purchased~~ at a 1.8% - 3.0% premium and are intended to be held to maturity. Included in these commercial real estate loan purchases were $18.1 million of commercial real estate loans secured by properties located in Washington. The remaining balance of $40.2 million of commercial real estate loan purchases were secured by properties located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Oregon, and Utah, reflecting our efforts to geographically diversify our loan portfolio with loans meeting our investment and credit quality objectives.

The following table details the types of commercial real estate, multifamily and construction and development loans in our portfolio. The roll over construction loans and land loans reported as multifamily or commercial loans and $2.3 million of one-to-four family bridge loans reported as one-to-four family non-owner occupied loans elsewhere in this document have been reclassified as construction and land development loans for this presentation. We routinely monitorJune 30, 2017. While the concentrations of our commercial and construction loans have increased, we routinely monitor these levels in support of our strategic plan to ~~ensure we are in line~~maintain compliance with internally established ~~limits.~~concentration guidelines. The Bank has set aggregate concentration guidelines ofthat total commercial real estate, including residential, non-residential, and construction, should not exceed 550% of total risk-based capital. ~~Construction and~~ Our guidelines for construction/land ~~development~~ loans ~~should not exceed~~are 100% of total risk-based capital. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s concentrations were ~~446.9%~~443.0% for total commercial real estate loans and ~~97.1%~~115.3% for total construction/land loans. The concentration of construction/land loans is calculated using the funded balance of these loans and consequently can fluctuate based on the timing of construction draws and ~~land development loans. Additionally,~~loan payoffs. Management reviews estimated construction draws and loan payoffs and adjusts loan originations based on these estimates to achieve compliance with our construction guidelines. Our commercial and multifamily real estate and construction/land ~~development~~ loan portfolios are subject to ongoing credit reviews performed by both independent loan review staff, as well as an external third-party review firm to assist with

identifying potential adverse trends and risks in the portfolio allowing management to initiate timely corrective action, as necessary. Such reviews also assist with ensuring loan risk grades are accurately assigned and thereby properly accounted for in the ALLL. The review places emphasis on large borrowing relationships, stress testing, compliance with loan covenants, as well as other risk factors warranting enhanced review.

The following table presents a breakdown of our loan portfolio by collateral type at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(In thousands)
Residential:
Multifamily $ 109,033
$ 114,724
Micro-unit apartments 26,381
8,023
Total Residential 135,414
122,747

Non-residential:
Office 104,448
78,295
Retail 128,561
77,365
Mobile home park and land 23,120
23,630
Warehouse 15,399
17,845
Storage 34,988
40,238
Mixed use 22,688
6,838
Total Non-residential 329,204
244,211

Construction/land development:
Commercial non-residential 31,709
17,058
One-to-four family residential 64,444
52,233
Multifamily 98,796
46,666
Total construction and development 194,949
115,957
Total commercial, multifamily and construction loans $ 659,567
$ 482,915



	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(In thousands)
Multifamily real estate:
Micro-unit apartments	$	5,580	$	7,878
Other multifamily	120,304		115,372
Total multifamily	125,884		123,250

Commercial real estate:
Office	95,256		101,688
Retail	99,482		106,294
Mobile home park	21,851		20,689
Warehouse	21,491		15,338
Storage	35,121		34,816
Other non-residential	44,017		24,869
Total commercial real estate	317,218		303,694

Construction/land:
One-to-four family residential	76,404		67,842
Multifamily	123,497		111,051
Commercial	1,100		—
Land	39,012		30,055
Total construction/land	240,013		208,948
Total commercial, multifamily and construction/land loans	$	683,115	$	635,892

During the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016,~~2017, total ~~construction~~construction/land loans ~~in accordance with regulatory guidance~~ increased by ~~$79.0~~$31.1 million ~~including $49.3~~as compared to December 31, 2016. The LIP related to these loans increased by $16.4 million as the unfunded portion of new loan originations exceeded disbursements on existing loans. Included in total construction/land loans, net of LIP, at June 30, 2017 are $48.9 million of multifamily ~~construction~~loans, $25,000 of commercial loans and $1.1 million of one-to-four family loans that will roll over to permanent loans ~~upon~~at the completion of ~~the~~their construction period in accordance with the terms of the construction/land loan.

To assist in our strategic initiatives for loan growth, the Bank will utilize loan participations or loan purchases within Washington or in the Western United States. The Bank’s goal with respect to participations is to locate a corresponding increase in LIP of $14.6 million. At September 30, 2016, total construction loans were $194.9 million, including LIP of $68.5 million, of which $98.8 million and $64.4 million were for multifamily and one-to-four family construction projects, respectively. Non-construction multifamily loans increased during the first nine months of 2016 by $12.7 million. Commercial real estate, not including raw land, increased $85.0 million at September 30, 2016 as comparedselling bank that is unable to ~~December 31, 2015, with $26.9 million~~make an entire loan due to legal or lending concentration limitations. Sellers of these loans ~~from California. The balances~~are reviewed for management/lending experience, financial condition, asset quality metrics, and regulatory matters. Loans acquired through participation or purchase must meet the Bank’s underwriting standards. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Bank purchased participation interests in ~~business~~seven loans in Washington and ~~consumer loans remained fairly stable during the first nine months~~California for a total of ~~2016. Offsetting these increases, our one-to-four family portfolio decreased by $2.1 million as competition for these loans remains high in this extended low rate environment.~~$23.3 million.

The majority of our loan portfolio continues to be focused in our primary market area, however we are also seeking geographic diversification. ~~The~~Through loan purchases and by loan originations initiated by our California employee, we have acquired loans secured by collateral ~~underlying~~located in Arizona, California, Colorado, Oregon, and Utah. At June 30, 2017, total loans secured by collateral located in California represented 2.1% of our total loans, net of LIP and total loans secured by collateral located outside the pools of loans purchased during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 are located throughout the West Coast. In addition, we are pursuing opportunities for loan participations outside our primary market area that meet our investment and credit quality objectives. During the first quarter of 2016, we hired an employee in the statestates of California ~~whose focus is directly originating new commercial~~ and ~~multifamily real estate loans as well as analyzing loan participation and loan purchase opportunities in the San Francisco Bay area. At September 30, 2016,~~Washington represented 4.8% of our total loans, ~~in California represent 3.1%~~net of ~~our portfolio.~~LIP. The following table details geographic concentrations in our loan portfolio, ~~shown~~ net of LIP:


	At September 30, 2016														At June 30, 2017
	One-to-four family residential		Multifamily		Commercial real estate		Construction/land development		Business		Consumer		Total		One-to-four family residential		Multifamily		Commercial real estate		Construction/land		Business		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
King County	$	188,460	$	102,538	$	178,154	$	62,613	$	8,014	$	5,749	$	545,528	$	192,685	$	78,548	$	162,228	$	131,287	$	8,908	$	7,980	$	581,636
Pierce County	40,939		16,404		36,731		—		—		541		94,615		37,908		15,044		27,198		3,766		—		511		84,427
Snohomish County	9,291		5,519		36,789		7,005		9		147		58,760		12,177		2,189		30,215		15,151		63		214		60,009
Kitsap County	4,000		5,910		961		—		—		78		10,949		1,632		1,536		823		135		—		78		4,204
California	—		—		26,933		—		—		—		26,933		—		—		17,911		—		439		—		18,350
Other Washington Counties	12,925		17,061		54,589		2,928		—		11		87,514		11,648		17,078		53,082		1,743		1,361		248		85,160
Outside Washington and California	290		11,654		22,963		—		—		—		34,907		582		11,489		25,218		—		4,435		—		41,724
Total loans, net LIP	$	255,905	$	159,086	$	357,120	$	72,546	$	8,023	$	6,526	$	859,206
Total loans, net of LIP															$	256,632	$	125,884	$	316,675	$	152,082	$	15,206	$	9,031	$	875,510

Our five largest borrowing relationships, which represent ~~9.5%~~9.9% of our net loans, increased by ~~$5.9~~$7.5 million to $87.0 million at June 30, 2017 from ~~$76.1~~$79.5 million at December 31, ~~2015 to $82.0 million at September 30,~~ 2016. ~~However, the~~The total number of loans represented by this group of borrowers ~~decreased~~increased to 30 loans at June 30, 2017 from 7023 loans at December 31, ~~2015 to 23 loans at September 30,~~ 2016. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, all five borrowers were current on their loan payments. We monitor the performance of these borrowing relationships very closely due to their concentration risk in relation to the entire loan portfolio. The following table details our five largest lending relationships at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016:~~2017:


Borrower ⁽¹⁾	Number of Loans	One-to-Four Family Residential ⁽²⁾		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land Development		Consumer		Aggregate Balance of Loans ⁽³⁾		Number of Loans	One-to-Four Family Residential ⁽²⁾		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Consumer		Aggregate Balance of Loans ⁽³⁾
		(Dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate investor	1	$	—			$	18,476					$	18,476	2	$	562	$	—	$	—	$	22,000	$	—	$	22,562
Real estate investor	11	—		16,750		843						17,593		17	—		17,417		832		—		—		18,249
Real estate investor	3	489				15,146						15,635		4	469		—		15,552		—		—		16,021
Real estate investor	5	469		—		14,832				100		15,401		5	461		—		14,443		—		500		15,404
Real estate builder	3	—				8,820		6,028				14,848
Real estate investor														2	—		—		—		14,755		—		14,755
Total	23	$	958	$	16,750	$	58,117	$	6,028	$	100	$	81,953	30	$	1,492	$	17,417	$	30,827	$	36,755	$	500	$	86,991

________


⁽¹⁾	The composition of borrowers represented in the table may change between periods.


⁽²⁾	~~All~~$930,000 of the one-to-four family residential loans for these borrowers are for owner occupied properties while $562,000 is for non-owner occupied. The commercial real estate loans are for non-owner occupied properties.


⁽³⁾	Net of LIP.

The ALLL increased to ~~$11.0~~$11.3 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, from ~~$9.5~~$11.0 million at December 31, ~~2015~~2016, and represented 1.3% ~~and 1.4%~~ of total loans receivable, net of LIP at ~~September~~both June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015, respectively.~~2016. The ALLL consists of two components, the general allowance and the specific reserves. The increase in the ALLL, primarily a result of growth in our loan portfolio, consisted of a ~~$1.8 million~~$439,000 increase in the general reserve, which included $34,000 of recoveries, and a ~~$226,000~~$105,000 decrease in the specific reserves. For additional information, see ~~"Comparison~~“Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015-Provision~~- Provision for Loan ~~Losses"~~Losses” discussed below.

We believe that the ALLL at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, was adequate to absorb the probable and inherent risks of loss in the loan portfolio at that date. While we believe the estimates and assumptions used in our determination of the adequacy of the allowance are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will be proven correct in the future, that the actual amount of future losses will not exceed the amount of past provisions, or that any increased provisions that may be required will not adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. Future additions to the allowance may become necessary based upon changing economic conditions, the level of problem loans, business conditions, credit concentrations, increased loan balances, or changes in the underlying collateral of the loan portfolio. In addition, the determination of the amount

of our ALLL is subject to review by bank regulators as part of the routine examination process, which may result

in the establishment of additional loss reserves or the charge-off of specific loans against established loss reserves based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

As we work with our borrowers that face difficult financial circumstances, we explore various options available to minimize our risk of loss. At times, the best option for our customers and the Bank is to modify the loan for a period of time, usually one year or less. Certain loan modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructured loans ~~("TDRs"~~(“TDRs”). These modifications have included a reduction in interest rate on the loan for a period of time, advancing the maturity date of the loan, or allowing interest-only payments for a specific time frame. These modifications are granted only when there is a reasonable and attainable restructured loan plan that has been agreed to by the borrower and is considered to be in the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s best interest.

The following table presents a breakdown of our TDRs at the dates indicated:


	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			Nine Month Change			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			Six Month Change
										(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming TDRs:
One-to-four family residential	$	182		$	131		$	51		$	106		$	174		$	(68	)
Total nonperforming TDRs	182			131			51			106			174			(68		)

Performing TDRs:
One-to-four family residential	27,268			35,099			(7,831		)	19,152			24,274			(5,122		)
Multifamily	1,572			1,594			(22		)	1,146			1,564			(418		)
Commercial real estate	4,917			5,392			(475		)	3,660			4,202			(542		)
Consumer	43			43			—			43			43			—
Total performing TDRs	33,800			42,128			(8,328		)	24,001			30,083			(6,082		)
Total TDRs	$	33,982		$	42,259		$	(8,277	)	$	24,107		$	30,257		$	(6,150	)
% TDRs classified as performing	99.5		%	99.7		%				99.6		%	99.4		%

Our TDRs decreased ~~$8.3~~$6.2 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, compared to December 31, ~~2015~~2016, as a result of principal repayments and loan payoffs. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, two TDRs were~~2017, one TDR of $106,000 was on nonaccrual status because it had previously not performed in accordance with the terms of its restructure although now current on ~~their~~its payments. There were no committed but undisbursed funds in connection with our TDRs and impaired loans. The largest TDR relationship at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, totaled ~~$9.6~~$8.2 million and was comprised of ~~$8.9~~$7.5 million in one-to-four family residential rental properties and ~~$758,000~~$747,000 in owner occupied commercial property, all located in King County.

Loans are considered past due if a scheduled principal or interest payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, total past due loans ~~comprised 0.02%~~represented 0.01% of total loans receivable, ~~net of LIP,~~ as compared to ~~0.18%~~0.06% at December 31, ~~2015.~~ 2016.

Nonperforming assets decreased to ~~$3.4~~$2.4 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, compared to ~~$4.7~~$3.2 million at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. The following table presents detailed information on our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:


	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			Nine Month Change			June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			Six Month Change
	(Dollars in thousands)									(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming loans:
One-to-four family residential	$	986		$	996		$	(10	)	$	528		$	798		$	(270	)
Consumer	87			89			(2		)	55			60			(5		)
Total nonperforming loans	1,073			1,085			(12		)	583			858			(275		)

OREO	2,331			3,663			(1,332		)	1,825			2,331			(506		)
Total nonperforming assets ⁽¹⁾	$	3,404		$	4,748		$	(1,344	)	$	2,408		$	3,189		$	(781	)

Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets	0.32		%	0.48		%				0.22		%	0.31		%

^____________

⁽¹⁾ The difference between nonperforming assets reported above, and the totals reported by other industry sources, is due to their inclusion of all TDRs as nonperforming loans, although ~~99.5%~~99.6% of our TDRs were performing in accordance with their restructured terms at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The remaining ~~0.5%~~0.4% of TDRs at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, that were nonperforming are reported above as nonperforming loans.

Nonaccrual loans are loans that are 90 days or more delinquent or other loans which, in management's opinion, the borrower is unable to meet scheduled payment obligations. Nonaccrual loans ~~remained stable~~decreased to $583,000 at ~~$1.1 million~~June 30, 2017, from $858,000 at ~~September 30, 2016, and~~ December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. During the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016, loans~~2017, one loan with a ~~total~~$62,000 balance was returned to accrual status as a result of ~~$153,000~~consistent payments for a period of time and demonstration of the ability to continue making payments. Further reductions in nonperforming loans were ~~transferred to nonaccrual status and were offset by $119,000~~the result of $213,000 in principal payments and payoffs of nonaccrual loans ~~and $47,000 in charge-offs of consumer loans~~ during this period. There were no charge-offs or loans added to nonaccrual status.

The three largest nonaccrual loans in the loan portfolio at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, included a ~~$310,000~~$283,000 owner occupied single family residence in Snohomish County, ~~which is current on its loan payments,~~ a ~~$169,000~~$131,000 owner occupied single family residence in Snohomish County, and a $106,000 owner occupied single family residence in King ~~County, and a $148,000 owner occupied single family residence in King County, which~~County. Each of these loans is current on its loan payments.

We continue to focus our efforts on working with borrowers to bring their loans current or converting nonaccrual loans to OREO and subsequently selling the properties. By taking ownership of these properties, we can generally convert nonearning assets into earning assets on a more timely basis than which may otherwise be the case. Our success in this area is reflected by the continued improved ratio of our nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets, which declined to ~~0.32%~~0.22% at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, compared to ~~0.48%~~0.31% at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

OREO. OREO includes properties acquired by the Bank through foreclosure or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. At ~~September~~June 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, OREO was $1.8 million and $2.3 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, a ~~decrease of $1.4 million from $3.7 million at December 31, 2015. The decrease in OREO during the first nine months of 2016 was a result of $1.1 million in property sales and $257,000 in~~$50,000 market valuation ~~adjustments. During the first nine months~~adjustment was taken on a property for which we had entered into a sale contract. The sale of ~~2016, the Bank sold a $164,000 non-residential land development project, a $728,000 commercial~~this property ~~and a $182,000 parcel of a multi-parcel commercial property, generating a net loss of $87,000.~~closed in April 2017.

The three largest OREO properties at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, were an office building valued at $837,000 located in Pierce County, ~~undeveloped land valued at $506,000 located in Kitsap County, and~~ a retail building valued at $505,000 in Mason County, and undeveloped land valued at $270,000 in Pierce County.

The following table presents a breakdown of our OREO by county and number of properties at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016:~~2017:



	County				Total OREO		Number of Properties	Percent of Total OREO
	Pierce		Mason		Total OREO		Number of Properties	Percent of Total OREO
	(Dollars in thousands)
OREO:
Commercial real estate ⁽¹⁾	$	1,320	$	505	$	1,825	4	100.0	%
Total OREO	$	1,320	$	505	$	1,825	4	100.0	%

County Total OREO Number of Properties Percent of
Total OREO
Pierce Kitsap Mason
(Dollars in thousands)
OREO:
Commercial real estate ⁽¹⁾
$ 1,320
$ 506
$ 505
$ 2,331
5
100.0 %
Total OREO $ 1,320
$ 506
$ 505
$ 2,331
5
100.0 %

⁽¹⁾Of the ~~five~~four properties classified as commercial real estate, two are office/retail buildings and ~~three~~two are undeveloped lots.

Deposits. During the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016,~~2017, deposits increased ~~$16.8~~$18.1 million to ~~$692.2~~$735.6 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, compared to ~~$675.4~~$717.5 million at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. Deposit accounts consisted of the following:


	September 30, 2016		Change from December 31, 2015			Percent Change		June 30, 2017		Change from December 31, 2016			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)							(Dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing	$	33,060	$	3,668		12.5	%	$	35,126	$	1,704		5.1	%
NOW	15,864		(397		)	(2.4	)
Interest-bearing checking								21,059		2,527			13.6
Statement savings	28,939		612			2.2		26,668		(1,715		)	(6.0	)
Money market	188,298		(23,138		)	(10.9	)	232,206		27,208			13.3
Certificates of deposit, retail	350,522		26,682			8.2		345,028		(11,625		)	(3.3	)
Certificates of deposit, brokered	75,488		9,337			14.1		75,488		—			—
	$	692,171	$	16,764		2.5		$	735,575	$	18,099		2.5

~~During~~The increase during the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016, total~~2017 was predominantly in retail deposits ~~increased $7.4 million primarily as a result of the increased customer base with~~reflecting our ~~new branch locations. Noninterest~~strategy to grow our core deposits. Growth occurred in both our noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing checking increased $3.7 million in 2016 with $1.5 million of this attributed to the three new branch locations. Retail certificates of deposit increased $26.7 million with $11.0 million of this increase from our branch locations. The balances in ouraccounts and money market accounts ~~related to short term deposits from large construction developers that are part~~as we pursue these sources of the EB-5 Immigrant Investor Program to fund development projects decreased from $62.8 million at December 31, 2015 to $11.3 million at September 30, 2016. The decrease in these accounts was partially offset by the addition of new money market accounts resulting in a net decrease of $23.1 million during the first nine months of 2016.lower cost funding.

~~Brokered~~Our portfolio of brokered certificates of deposits ~~increased by $9.3~~remained at $75.5 million ~~during the nine months ended September~~at June 30, ~~2016, as we redeemed $14.6 million of certificates and added $23.9 million~~ ~~of new~~ ~~brokered certificates of deposit, reducing the weighted average cost~~2017, unchanged from December 31, 2016. We may add to our portfolio of these ~~funds to 1.6%.~~brokered deposits as a source of additional funding in future periods. While brokered certificates of deposit may carry a higher cost than our retail certificates, their remaining maturity periods of 2213 to 5243 months, along with the enhanced call features of these deposits, assist us in our efforts to manage interest rate risk.

At ~~both September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, we held ~~$23.7~~$23.8 million and ~~$16.0~~$23.7 million in public funds, respectively, nearly all of which were retail certificates of deposit.

Advances. We use advances from the FHLB as an alternative funding source to reduce interest rate risk and to leverage our balance sheet. Total FHLB advances were $191.5 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and $171.5 million at December 31, ~~2015 were $221.5~~2016. At June 30, 2017, the Bank held $56.5 million in borrowings that are due in less than one year and ~~$125.5~~$135.0 million ~~respectively. During the first nine months of 2016, we paid off two~~in borrowings that are due in one to three years. Included in our total advances at ~~their scheduled maturity dates for $34.0~~that date is a $50.0 million ~~which carried~~three-month fixed-rate advance designated as a ~~0.81% interest rate, and $20.0 million, which carried~~hedge instrument in a ~~0.70% interest rate. We replaced these funds and borrowed additional funds~~cash flow hedge, as described below. Included in the ~~form~~category of ~~$110.0~~advances that are due in one to three years is a $120.0 million ~~in overnight fed funds and a $40.0 million seven year~~ Member Option ~~Variable-rate Advance from the FHLB. This~~Variable Rate advance ~~will reprice monthly~~that reprices quarterly and allows prepayment without penalties on the repricing ~~dates. Of our total FHLB advances, $160.0~~date.

Cash Flow Hedge. To assist in managing interest rate risk, the Bank entered into a five-year, $50 million notional, pay fixed, receive floating cash flow hedge or interest rate swap with a qualified institution on October 25, 2016. Under the terms of the agreement, the Bank will pay a fixed rate of 1.34% for five years and, will in turn, receive an interest payment based on the three-month LIBOR index, which resets quarterly. Concurrently, the Bank borrowed a $50.0 million fixed rate three-month advance that will be renewed quarterly at the fixed interest rate in effect at that time. Effectiveness of the swap is ~~due to mature~~evaluated quarterly with any ineffectiveness recognized as a gain or a loss on the income statement in ~~less than one year,~~noninterest income. A change in the fair value of the cash flow hedge is recognized as an other asset or other liability on the balance sheet with the ~~remaining $61.5~~tax-effected portion of the change included in other comprehensive income. At June 30, 2017, we recognized a $1.1 million ~~due~~fair value asset as a result in ~~one to seven years.~~the increase in the market value of the hedge agreement.

Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity ~~decreased $19.6~~increased $5.4 million during ~~2016~~2017 to ~~$151.1~~$143.5 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, from ~~$170.7~~$138.1 million at December 31, ~~2015 primarily due~~2016. Additional paid-in capital increased $1.6 million as a result of the exercise of stock options for 115,880 shares during the six months ended June 30, 2017. Also contributing to ~~common stock repurchases. Retained~~the increase, retained earnings increased ~~$3.7 million to $46.6~~$2.9 million during the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016 due to $5.9~~2017, as a result of $4.2 million ofin net income partially offset by ~~$2.2~~$1.3 million ofpaid out in shareholder dividends.

The following table shows cash dividends paid per share and the related dividend payout ratio for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016			2017			2016

Dividend declared per common share	$	0.06		$	0.06		$	0.18		$	0.18		$	0.07		$	0.06		$	0.13		$	0.12
Dividend payout ratio ⁽¹⁾	27.4		%	33.3		%	37.9		%	35.3		%	38.9		%	51.8		%	32.0		%	46.4		%

______________

⁽¹⁾Dividends paid per common share divided by basic earnings per common share

~~As part~~The Company has a share repurchase plan in effect from May 30, 2017 through November 30, 2017 authorizing the repurchase of ~~the strategy to increase shareholder value,~~1,100,000 shares, or 10.0% of outstanding shares. At June 30, 2017, the Company had repurchased ~~a total of 1,868,112~~22,700 shares ~~during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Under a plan from November 2, 2015 through April 27, 2016, the Company purchased 436,145 shares from January 1, 2016 through the expiration of the plan~~ at an average price of $13.37. On August 9, 2016, the Company completed the repurchase of $18.1 million in shares through a self-tender offer announced July 13, 2016. On September 9, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1,500,000 shares of the Company's common stock, or 12.5% of the Company's outstanding shares. This plan expires on March 27, 2017. From September 9, 2016 through September 30, 2016, the Company repurchased 137,500 shares under the current plan.

Additional paid-in-capital decreased $25.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 as a combined result of $26.4 million used to repurchase shares, partially offset by increases of $318,000 from the exercise of stock options and $505,000 from stock-based compensation. Accumulated other comprehensive gain increased $1.1 million from an accumulated other comprehensive loss as a result of improvements in after-tax valuation adjustments on investments available-for-sale.$15.93 per share.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

General. Net income for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$2.6~~$1.9 million, or ~~$0.22~~$0.18 per diluted share as compared to net income of ~~$2.4~~$1.4 million, or ~~$0.18~~$0.11 per diluted share for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015.~~2016. The ~~$160,000~~$428,000 increase in net income during the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016~~2017 was primarily a result of ~~increases~~an increase in net interest income and ~~noninterest income and decreases in noninterest expense and federal income tax expense reduced by an increase~~a decrease in the provision for loan ~~losses.~~losses partially offset by an increase in noninterest expense.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 increased ~~$1.2 million~~$814,000 to ~~$8.9~~$9.0 million, as compared to ~~$7.7~~$8.2 million for the ~~second~~first quarter in ~~2015~~2016, due ~~primarily~~ to ~~growth~~the $1.4 million increase in our interest income partially offset by a $633,000 increase in interest expense. Interest income primarily increased as a result of the growth in average loans receivable. Our net interest margin was 3.60% for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, compared to 3.63% for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The change between quarters was primarily attributed to increased costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities due to ~~an increase~~the recent increases in ~~the average balance of interest-earning assets and the shift from lower yielding interest-earning deposits to higher yielding investment securities and loan receivables.~~short term interest rates.

The following table details the change in net interest income due to changes in yield or cost, or changes in the average balance of the related asset or liability:



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to June 30, 2016 Net Change
	Rate			Volume			Total
	(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net	$	(176	)	$	1,480		$	1,304
Investments available-for-sale	138			(8		)	130
Interest-earning deposits with banks	22			(27		)	(5		)
FHLB stock	—			18			18
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets	(16		)	1,463			1,447

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand	13			1			14
Statement savings	(1		)	(1		)	(2		)
Money market	125			21			146
Certificates of deposit, retail	58			76			134
Certificates of deposit, brokered	2			41			43
Advances from the FHLB	163			135			298
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities	360			273			633
Total net change in net interest income	$	(376	)	$	1,190		$	814

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Compared to September 30, 2015
Net Change

Rate
Volume
Total

(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:

   Loan receivable, net $ (546 )
$ 1,815

$ 1,269
   Investments available-for-sale 164

50

214
   Interest-earning deposits 20

(49 )
(29 )
   FHLB stock 26

4

30
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets (336 )
1,820

1,484

Interest-bearing liabilities:

   NOW 5

—

5
   Statement savings —

2

2
   Money market 39

15

54
   Certificates of deposit, retail 107

23

130
   Certificates of deposit, brokered (37 ) 22
(15 )
   Advances from the FHLB (75 )
113

38
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities 39

175

214
Total net change in net interest income $ (375 )
$ 1,645

$ 1,270

The $1.3 million increase in loan interest income during the ~~third~~second quarter of ~~2016~~2017, as compared to the same period in ~~2015~~2016, was a result of a ~~$138.8~~$118.7 million increase in the average outstanding loan balance partially offset by a decrease in yield of 27 basis points. Growth in our commercial, multifamily and construction real estate loans, including $58.3 million in purchased multifamily and commercial real estate loans during 2016, contributed significantly to the increase in the average loan ~~balance.~~yield of nine basis points. Higher yielding loans continue to be repaid while rates of new loan originations remain relatively unchanged in spite of the recent rate increases in the Federal Funds rate by the Federal Reserve Board.

During the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2016,~~2017, interest income from our investments available-for-sale increased by ~~$214,000~~$130,000 as compared to the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The average balance of our investments available-for-sale for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016 increased~~2017 decreased by ~~$10.6~~$1.4 million as compared to the same period last year as ~~invested interest-earning deposits earning~~sales and paydowns outpaced purchases of new investments. As a ~~nominal yield were placed into higher yielding securities. In addition,~~result of restructuring our ~~investments~~ available-for-sale investment portfolio ~~was restructured~~ through the sales of lower yielding investment securities, and utilizing the proceeds received to purchase higher yielding, long-term investment securities ~~resulted~~last year, our yield on these assets increased by 42 basis points for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in ~~a 49 basis point increase in the average yield of investments available-for-sale.~~2016.

Partially offsetting the increase in interest income, interest expense increased by ~~$214,000~~$633,000 for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, as compared to the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The average balance of our interest-bearing liabilities increased $116.4 million over the last year to support the growth in ~~all~~our financial assets. The average balance of ~~our funding sources yet~~deposits increased by $55.1 million for the ~~total cost~~three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, including growth in retail certificates of ~~these funds remained stable. Notable changes occurred in~~deposit of $26.0 million, money market accounts of $19.5 million, brokered certificates of deposit ~~as the 21 basis point~~of $9.9 million, and interest-bearing checking accounts of $2.8 million. These increases were partially offset by a decrease ~~in the cost~~ of ~~these funds outweighed the $4.8~~$3.1 million ~~increase~~ in the average balance of ~~these funds, resulting in a $15,000 decrease in interest expense. To support the growth in~~ our ~~loans receivable, we~~statement savings accounts. The average cost of our deposits increased ~~the average balance of FHLB advances~~ by ~~$47.3 million during~~12 basis points for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016. ~~Replacements in maturing advances~~In further support of our asset growth, average borrowings at the FHLB increased by $61.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, and ~~new advances were taken as variable rate federal funds, thereby reducing~~ the average cost of these funds ~~by 16~~increased 35 basis ~~points.~~points as compared to the same period in 2016. The average cost of both our deposits and FHLB borrowings increased for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016 in response to increases in the Federal Funds rate.

The following table compares detailed average balances, related interest income or interest expense, associated yields and rates, and the resulting net interest margin for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015.~~2016. Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of net loans receivable and are considered to carry a zero yield.


	Three Months Ended September 30,												Three Months Ended June 30,
	2016						2015						2017						2016
	Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Loans receivable, net	$	804,014	$	9,967	4.92	%	$	665,183	$	8,698	5.19	%	$	844,853	$	10,352	4.91	%	$	726,109	$	9,048	5.00	%
Investments available-for-sale	133,258		792		2.36		122,685		578		1.87		132,375		887		2.69		133,813		757		2.27
Interest-earning deposits	28,275		38		0.53		105,901		67		0.25
Interest-earning deposits with banks													16,831		42		1.00		39,167		47		0.48
FHLB stock	8,483		45		2.10		6,537		15		0.91		8,616		62		2.89		6,097		44		2.89
Total interest-earning assets	974,030		10,842		4.42		900,306		9,358		4.12		1,002,675		11,343		4.54		905,186		9,896		4.39
Noninterest earning assets	60,781						61,480						63,802						58,002
Total average assets	$	1,034,811					$	961,786					$	1,066,477					$	963,188

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
NOW	$	18,018	$	9	0.20	%	$	17,578	$	4	0.09	%
Interest-bearing checking													$	20,426	$	19	0.37	%	$	17,592	$	5	0.11	%
Statement savings	30,902		12		0.15		26,436		10		0.15		27,366		10		0.15		30,449		12		0.16
Money market	185,089		211		0.45		169,420		157		0.37		220,241		358		0.65		200,738		212		0.42
Certificates of deposit, retail	341,685		1,021		1.19		333,141		891		1.06		349,401		1,075		1.23		323,390		941		1.17
Certificates of deposit, brokered	70,964		292		1.63		66,122		307		1.84		75,488		314		1.67		65,612		271		1.66
Total interest-bearing deposits													692,922		1,776		1.03		637,781		1,441		0.91
Advances from the FHLB	182,804		363		0.79		135,500		325		0.95		184,357		570		1.24		123,148		272		0.89
Total interest-bearing liabilities	829,462		1,908		0.91		748,197		1,694		0.90		877,279		2,346		1.07		760,929		1,713		0.90
Noninterest bearing liabilities	43,659						37,078						45,555						33,082
Average equity	161,690						176,511						143,643						169,177
Total average liabilities and equity	$	1,034,811					$	961,786					$	1,066,477					$	963,188
Net interest income			$	8,934					$	7,664					$	8,997					$	8,183
Net interest margin					3.64	%					3.38	%					3.60	%					3.63	%

Provision for Loan Losses. Management recognizes that loan losses may occur over the life of a loan and that the ALLL must be maintained at a level necessary to absorb specific losses on impaired loans and probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Our methodology for analyzing the ALLL consists of two components: general and specific reserves. The general reserve is determined by applying factors to our various groups of loans. Management considers factors such as charge-off history, the prevailing economy, the regulatory environment, competition, geographic and loan type concentrations, policy and underwriting standards, nature and volume of the loan portfolio, managements’ experience level, our loan review and grading systems, the value of underlying collateral and the level of problem loans in assessing the ALLL. The specific reserve component is created when management believes that the collectability of a specific loan has been impaired and a loss is probable. The specific reserves are computed using current appraisals, listed sales prices, and other available information, less costs to complete, if any, and costs to sell the property. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available or if future events differ from current estimates.

During the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, management evaluated the adequacy of the ALLL and concluded that additional provision for loan losses in the amount of ~~$900,000~~$100,000 was appropriate for the quarter. For the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015,~~2016, a ~~$700,000 recapture of the~~$600,000 provision for loan losses was recorded. For the ~~third~~second quarter of ~~2016,~~2017, the provision for loan losses was primarily a result of growth in our loan ~~portfolio.~~receivables partially offset by payoffs and credit improvements to certain adversely classified loans. In comparison, the ~~recapture~~provision reported in the ~~third~~second quarter of ~~2015~~2016 was primarily a result of ~~$265,000 recoveries and payoffs on $5.0 million~~an increase in the balance of our loans ~~classified as "special mention".~~receivable.

The following table summarizes selected financial data related to our ALLL and loan portfolio. All loan balances and ratios are calculated using loan balances that are net of LIP.


	At or For the Three Months Ended September 30,						At or For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Total loans receivable, net of LIP, end of period	$	859,205		$	687,676		$	875,510		$	778,120
Average loans receivable during period	804,014			665,183			844,853			726,109
ALLL balance at beginning of period	10,134			10,603			11,158			9,471
Provision (recapture of provision) for loan losses	900			(700		)
Provision for loan losses							100			600
Charge-offs:
One-to-four family	—			(2		)
Consumer	(28		)	(20		)	—			—
Total charge-offs	(28		)	(22		)	—			—
Recoveries:
One-to-four family	—			217			27			63
Commercial real estate	—			48
Total recoveries	—			265			27			63
Net (charge-off) recovery	(28		)	243
Net recovery							27			63
ALLL balance at end of period	$	11,006		$	10,146		$	11,285		$	10,134
ALLL as a percent of total loans, net of LIP	1.28		%	1.48		%	1.29		%	1.30		%
Ratio of net (charge-offs) recoveries to average net loans receivable (annualized)	(0.01		)	0.14
Ratio of net recoveries to average net loans receivable							0.01			0.03

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased ~~$226,000~~$23,000 to ~~$673,000~~$731,000 for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, from ~~$447,000~~$708,000 for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015.~~2016. The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of noninterest income:


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016		Change from Three Months ended September 30, 2015			Percent Change		Three Months Ended June 30, 2017	Change from Three Months Ended June 30, 2016		Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)							(Dollars in thousands)
Service fees on deposit accounts	$	16	$	4		33.3	%	38	9		31.0	%
Loan service fees	52		(4		)	(7.1	)	120	39		48.1
Net gain on sale of investments	33		(52		)	(61.2	)	56	56		100.0
BOLI change in cash surrender value	251		38			17.8		116	(109	)	(48.4	)
Wealth management revenue	165		123			292.9		307	26		9.3
Other	156		117			300.0		94	2		2.2
Total noninterest income	$	673	$	226		50.6		731	23		3.2

The increase in the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, compared to the quarter ended September 30, 2015, was primarily a result of the $123,000 increase in income from our wealth management services. These services, which began in May 2015, allow us to offer a broader range of wealth management solutions to appropriately meet the needs of our customers. Other noninterest income increased by $117,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same quarter in 2015 as a result of receipt of certain loan fees. The increase in noninterest income recognized on our BOLI policies reflects the increase in cash surrender value of these policies. We recognize the increase in cash surrender value of these policies, which represents the increase in underlying investments, as noninterest income, which assists in offsetting expenses for employee benefits. In addition, during the quarter ended June 30, 2016, was partially the result of the $56,000 gain on sales of a portion of a corporate bond and two mortgage-backed securities during the second quarter of 2017. During the same period in 2016, we ~~surrendered~~did not sell any of our investment securities. Further contributing to the increase in 2017, loan service fees increased by $39,000 as a result of increased prepayment penalties and wealth management revenue increased by $26,000 as we continue to expand our portfolio of managed accounts. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in noninterest income from our BOLI policies. During the second quarter of 2017, we purchased $4.2 million in additional policies where certain policy expenses are deducted from earnings over the first year, thereby reducing the overall noninterest income recognized from BOLI policies for the initial one ~~$10.2 million BOLI policy which was replaced with a higher yielding policy.~~year period.

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense ~~decreased $127,000~~increased $764,000 to ~~$5.3~~$6.8 million for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 from ~~$5.4~~$6.1 million for the comparable quarter in ~~2015.~~2016.

The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of noninterest expense:


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016			Change from Three Months ended September 30, 2015			Percent Change		Three Months Ended June 30, 2017			Change from Three Months Ended June 30, 2016			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	3,821		$	333		9.5	%	$	4,409		$	568		14.8	%
Occupancy and equipment	467			80			20.7		579			91			18.6
Professional fees	458			(14		)	(3.0	)	482			(79		)	(14.1	)
Data processing	259			83			47.2		519			268			106.8
Gain on sale of OREO property, net									(5		)	(94		)	(105.6	)
OREO related expenses, net	(11		)	(35		)	(145.8	)	(15		)	(1		)	7.1
Regulatory assessments	82			(37		)	(31.1	)	112			(5		)	(4.3	)
Insurance and bond premiums	86			(3		)	(3.4	)	98			12			14.0
Marketing	67			(36		)	(35.0	)	52			12			30.0
Other general and administrative	25			(498		)	(95.2	)	605			(8		)	(1.3	)
Total noninterest expense	$	5,254		$	(127	)	(2.4	)%	$	6,836		$	764		12.6	%

Expenses for salaries and employee benefits increased ~~$333,000~~$568,000 for the ~~third~~second quarter of ~~2016~~2017, as compared to the same period in ~~2015~~2016 primarily as a result of increases in ~~salaries and~~costs due to the increase in the number of employees. As a result of our new branches and the development of new products, the number of employees increased ~~from 107~~to 129 at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015 to~~2017 from 118 at ~~September~~June 30, 2016. In addition, ~~annual increases occurred between~~ the ~~comparative periods.~~change in timing of recognition of the compensation expense for directors’ restricted stock awards resulted in $180,000 of additional expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.

~~More than~~As a result of our pending acquisition of four retail branches, our data processing expense increased by $268,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due primarily to the cost of data conversion of the accounts in these branches.

Partially offsetting ~~this increase, other general and administrative expenses~~these increases, professional fees decreased ~~$498,000~~by $79,000, primarily as a result of a ~~recapture~~reduction in legal costs. During the ~~reserve for unfunded commitments. This reserve is funded~~second quarter of 2016, we incurred additional legal expenses relating to ~~absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities. For~~our modified Dutch auction tender offer completed in 2016. In addition, noninterest expense declined as we incurred a $5,000 gain on the sale of OREO property in the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, we determined~~2017 as compared to a ~~$373,000 recapture was appropriate. The strong credit quality metrics~~loss on sale of the Company's loan portfolio resulted in improvements in the unfunded commitment reserve calculation methodology, resulting in this recapture. In comparison, we recognized a $178,000 additional expense$89,000 for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015.~~2016.

Federal Income Tax Expense. Our statutory income tax rate is 35%. We recorded federal income tax provisions of ~~$847,000~~$924,000 and ~~$984,000~~$779,000 for the quarters ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, and ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, as a result of our consolidated pretax net income. ~~For~~Our effective tax rate for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 was 30.3%, which reflected the year-to-date impact of stock options exercised in the first quarter of 2017. In comparison, the effective tax rate for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 ~~our tax provision~~ was ~~net~~32.1%, which reflected reversal of nontaxable BOLI income and a ~~$213,000 benefit from utilizing an otherwise expiring capital loss carryforward for our 2015 tax return that was filed during~~10% penalty on the ~~quarter.~~early surrender a BOLI policy.

Comparison of Operating Results for the ~~Nine~~Six Months Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016

General. Net income for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 was ~~$5.9~~$4.2 million, or ~~$0.47~~$0.40 per diluted share as compared to net income of ~~$7.0~~$3.3 million, or ~~$0.51~~$0.26 per diluted share for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015. Significantly contributing to the decline in net~~2016. Net interest income ~~during the first nine months of 2016 was the recognition of a $1.4 million provision for loan loss in 2016 as compared to a $1.3 recapture of provision in 2015. In addition, noninterest expense~~ increased by ~~$2.6 million. These decreases were~~$1.9 million year over year, however this was partially offset by a ~~$2.1~~$1.1 million increase in ~~net interest income, $966,000 increase in~~ noninterest ~~income and a decrease in federal income tax provision of $972,000.~~expense.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 increased ~~$2.1~~$1.9 million to ~~$24.9~~$17.9 million, as compared to ~~$22.8~~$16.0 million for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016, due to the $2.9 million increase in our interest income partially offset by a $988,000 increase in interest expense. The increase in total interest income was primarily the result of the growth in ~~our higher yielding~~average loans receivable. Our net interest margin was 3.62% for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to 3.54% for the six months ended June 30, 2016. The change between periods was primarily attributed to the increase in average loan balances and the increase in the average yield on interest-earning ~~assets.~~assets outpacing increased average costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities.

The following table details the change in net interest income due to changes in yield or cost, or changes in the average balance of the related asset or liability:


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 Compared to September 30, 2015 Net Change									Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to June 30, 2016 Net Change
	Rate			Volume			Total			Rate			Volume			Total
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loan receivable, net	$	(1,055	)	$	2,865		$	1,810
Loans receivable, net										$	(628	)	$	3,232		$	2,604
Investments available-for-sale	468			171			639			315			(15		)	300
Interest-earning deposits	100			(98		)	2
Interest-earning deposits with banks										35			(109		)	(74		)
FHLB stock	115			1			116			19			34			53
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets	(372		)	2,939			2,567			(259		)	3,142			2,883

Interest-bearing liabilities:
NOW	5			—			5
Interest-bearing demand										25			1			26
Statement savings	3			4			7			(1		)	(1		)	(2		)
Money market	127			110			237			197			19			216
Certificates of deposit, retail	286			(96		)	190			135			165			300
Certificates of deposit, brokered	(20		)	34			14			(91		)	94			3
Advances from the FHLB	(84		)	54			(30		)	190			255			445
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities	317			106			423			455			533			988
Total net change in net interest income	$	(689	)	$	2,833		$	2,144		$	(714	)	$	2,609		$	1,895

Average loans receivable increased ~~$73.5~~$128.5 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 as compared to the same period in ~~2015~~2016 while the average yield decreased to ~~5.02%~~4.92% from ~~5.21%~~5.07% for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015, respectively. Contributing to~~respectively as loans originated during the ~~growth of our loan portfolio, we purchased $58.3 million in commercial real estate loans in 2016 that~~past year were ~~purchased~~ at ~~a 1.8% - 3.0% premium, which is amortized against interest income over the remaining maturity of the loans.~~lower average rates than those paying off.

Interest income on our investments available-for-sale increased ~~$639,000~~$300,000 for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 as compared to the same period in ~~2015~~2016 primarily as a result of the 4748 basis point increase in the yield on these assets. We have continued to restructure our portfolio of these securities to include additional longer term higher-yielding investment securities to increase earnings from our investment portfolio.

~~The Federal Reserve Bank's federal funds rate increase in December 2015 positively impacted the rate paid~~Interest income on our interest-earning ~~deposits. The average rate earned on interest-earning~~ deposits ~~increased 26 basis points~~decreased $74,000 for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017 as compared to the same period in ~~2015. The increase in interest due to~~2016, primarily as a result of the ~~rate increase was largely offset by the~~$43.3 million decrease in ~~our~~the average balance of these deposits as we shifted ~~these funds to~~cash earning a nominal yield into higher yielding ~~assets during 2016.~~assets. Partially offsetting the impact of the decrease in average balance, the average yield earned on interest-earning deposits from the Federal Reserve Bank increased by 34 basis points year over year.

Partially offsetting the increase in interest income, our interest expense increased ~~$423,000~~$988,000 for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 as compared to the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The average cost of our deposits increased by nine basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016. Interest expense on money market accounts increased by $216,000, year over year primarily due to an 18 basis point increase ~~was~~in the cost of these funds. In addition, interest expense on retail certificates of deposit increased by $300,000, primarily from a combined result of a ~~$44.0~~$28.9 million increase in the average balance of ~~our interest-bearing liabilities~~these accounts and a two basis point increase in the overall cost of these funds. While the average balance of our FHLB advances increased by $7.6 million, total year-to-date interest paid decreased by $30,000 year over year as a result of an eight basis point decrease in the cost of these funds. Maturing longer-term fixed rate advances were replaced by short-term, variable rate advances, thereby significantly reducing the cost of these borrowings. In addition, the early redemption of several brokered certificates of deposit and securing of new brokered certificates at lower rates helped to offset the increased interest due to the increase in volume of these funds. Interest expense on money market accounts increased $237,000 for the first nine months of 2016 as a combined result of increases in the average balance and rate paid for these deposits. Further contributing to the increase in interest expense, an 11 basis point increase in the cost of these funds. Interest expense on our ~~retail certificates of deposit outweighed the $12.3 million decrease in the average balance of these deposits resulting in $190,000 additional interest expense~~FHLB advances and other borrowings increased by $445,000 for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, as compared to the same period in ~~2015.~~2016 as a result of a $55.0 million increase in the average balance of FHLB advances and a 22 basis point increase in the cost of these funds.

The following table compares detailed average balances, associated yields and rates, and the resulting changes in interest and dividend income or expense for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015.~~2016. Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of net loans receivable and are considered to carry a zero yield.


	Nine Months Ended September 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016						2015						2017						2016
	Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield or Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield or Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield or Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield or Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Loans receivable, net	$	739,312	$	27,742	5.02	%	$	665,765	$	25,932	5.21	%	$	835,106	$	20,379	4.92	%	$	706,606	$	17,775	5.07	%
Investments available-for-sale	132,471		2,224		2.24		119,572		1,585		1.77		130,693		1,732		2.67		132,073		1,432		2.19
Interest-earning deposits	51,855		198		0.51		103,557		196		0.25
Interest-earning deposits with banks													20,512		86		0.85		63,774		160		0.51
FHLB stock	6,878		136		2.64		6,630		20		0.40		8,327		144		3.49		6,066		91		3.03
Total interest-earning assets	930,516		30,300		4.35		895,524		27,733		4.14		994,638		22,341		4.53		908,519		19,458		4.32
Noninterest earning assets	59,127						56,699						61,848						58,291
Total average assets	$	989,643					$	952,223					$	1,056,486					$	966,810

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
NOW	$	17,534	$	18	0.14	%	$	18,100	$	13	0.10	%
Interest-bearing checking													$	19,956	$	35	0.35	%	$	17,290	$	9	0.10	%
Statement savings	29,461		35		0.16		25,546		28		0.15		27,717		21		0.15		28,733		23		0.16
Money market	198,958		636		0.43		156,100		399		0.34		215,071		641		0.60		205,968		425		0.42
Certificates of deposit, retail	329,622		2,867		1.16		341,897		2,677		1.05		352,391		2,147		1.23		323,524		1,847		1.15
Certificates of deposit, brokered	67,345		913		1.81		64,875		899		1.85		75,488		623		1.66		65,516		620		1.91
Total interest-bearing deposits													690,623		3,467		1.01		641,031		2,924		0.92
Advances from the FHLB	143,092		933		0.87		135,500		963		0.95		177,964		1,015		1.15		123,017		570		0.93
Total interest-bearing liabilities	786,012		5,402		0.92		742,018		4,979		0.90		868,587		4,482		1.04		764,048		3,494		0.92
Noninterest bearing liabilities	36,545						30,472						45,796						32,948
Average equity	167,086						179,733						142,103						169,814
Total average liabilities and equity	$	989,643					$	952,223					$	1,056,486					$	966,810
Net interest income			$	24,898					$	22,754					$	17,859					$	15,964
Net interest margin					3.58	%					3.40	%					3.62	%					3.54	%

Provision for Loan Losses. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, management evaluated the adequacy of the ALLL and concluded that additional provision for loan losses in the amount of ~~$1.4 million~~$300,000 was appropriate for the period. The provision ~~during~~for the ~~first nine~~six months ~~of 2016~~ended June 30, 2017 was primarily a reflection of the ~~$160.9~~$46.6 million growth in net loans ~~receivable.~~receivable partially offset by payoffs and credit improvements to certain adversely classified loans. For ~~2015,~~ the ~~first nine month's recapture~~six months ended June 30, 2016, an additional provision of ~~$1.3 million~~$500,000 was ~~primarily~~recorded as a result of ~~net recoveries of $955,000 and the repayment of $5.0 million of loans graded as "special mention", which reduced the amount required to be set aside in the general reserve.~~loan growth.

The following table summarizes selected financial data related to our ALLL and loan portfolio. All loan balances and ratios are calculated using loan balances that are net of LIP.


	At or For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						At or For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Total loans receivable, net of LIP, end of period	$	859,206		$	687,676		$	875,510		$	778,120
Average loans receivable during period	739,312			665,765			835,106			706,606
ALLL balance at beginning of period	9,463			10,491			10,951			9,463
Provision (recapture of provision) for loan losses	1,400			(1,300		)
Provision for loan losses							300			500
Charge-offs:
One-to-four family	—			(27		)
Multifamily	—			(281		)
Consumer	(47		)	(54		)	—			(19		)
Total charge-offs	(47		)	(362		)	—			(19		)
Recoveries:
One-to-four family	85			908			33			85
Commercial real estate	104			105			—			104
Business	—			3
Consumer	1			301			1			1
Total recoveries	190			1,317			34			190
Net recovery	143			955			34			171
ALLL balance at end of period	$	11,006		$	10,146		$	11,285		$	10,134
ALLL as a percent of total loans, net of LIP	1.28		%	1.48		%	1.29		%	1.30		%
Ratio of net recoveries to average net loans receivable (annualized)	0.03			0.19			0.01			0.05

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income increased ~~$966,000~~$78,000 to ~~$1.9~~$1.3 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, from ~~$895,000~~$1.2 million for the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of noninterest income:


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016		Change from Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Percent Change		Six Months Ended June 30, 2017		Change from Six Months Ended June 30, 2016			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)							(Dollars in thousands)
Service fees on deposit accounts	$	60	$	5		9.1	%	$	63	$	19		43.2	%
Loan service fees	181		70			63.1		155		26			20.2
Net gain on sale of investments	33		(52		)	(61.2	)	56		56			n/a
BOLI change in cash surrender value	641		272			73.7		317		(73		)	(18.7	)
Wealth management revenue	656		592			925.0		447		(44		)	(9.0	)
Other	290		79			37.4		228		94			70.1
Total noninterest income	$	1,861	$	966		107.9		$	1,266	$	78		6.6

The ~~$272,000 increase in~~largest change to our noninterest ~~BOLI~~ income was primarily a result of $20.0 million of BOLI policies purchased in April 2015 and the surrender of one $10.2 million BOLI policy which was replaced with a higher yielding policy. Wealth management revenue increased by $592,000 for the ~~first three quarters of 2016~~six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in ~~2015. The commissions~~2016 was the $95,000 increase in other noninterest income. This increase was a result of an additional $77,000 of fees received during the 2017 six month period on loans where certain commercial loan customers participate in an interest rate swap with a third party broker institution and the Bank receives a fee that is recognized as other noninterest income at the time the loan is originated. In addition, sales of investment securities generated a $56,000 gain for the six months ended June 30, 2017, compared to none for the same period in ~~2015 represent~~2016. Loan servicing fees, primarily from prepayment penalties, increased by $26,000 year over year. Partially offsetting these increases, BOLI noninterest income from the ~~initial two~~change in cash surrender value of our policies decreased by $74,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to expenses relating to the $4.1 million in additional BOLI policies purchased during the second quarter of 2017, as discussed above. Further offsetting our income, our wealth management revenue decreased $44,000 for the first six months of 2017 as compared to the ~~Company offering wealth management services.~~same period in 2016 as a result of normal fluctuations in business activity.

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased ~~$2.6~~$1.1 million to $12.9 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 as compared to the same period in ~~2015.~~2016.

The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of noninterest expense:


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016			Change from Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015			Percent Change		Six Months Ended June 30, 2017			Change from Six Months Ended June 30, 2016			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	11,436		$	1,283		12.6	%	$	8,694		$	1,079		14.2	%
Occupancy and equipment	1,463			424			40.8		1,059			63			6.3
Professional fees	1,487			203			15.8		921			(108		)	(10.5	)
Data processing	700			177			33.8		759			318			72.1
Loss (gain) on sales of OREO property, net	87			618			(116.4	)
(Gain) loss on sales of OREO property, net									(5		)	(92		)	(105.7	)
OREO market value adjustments	257			252			5,040.0		50			(207		)	(80.5	)
OREO-related expenses, net	(45		)	(62		)	(364.7	)	(25		)	9			(26.5	)
Regulatory assessments	319			(32		)	(9.1	)	208			(29		)	(12.2	)
Insurance and bond premiums	260			(10		)	(3.7	)	197			23			13.2
Marketing	145			(45		)	(23.7	)	100			22			28.2
Other general and administrative	990			(254		)	(20.4	)	946			(19		)	(2.0	)
Total noninterest expense	$	17,099		$	2,554		17.6	%	$	12,904		$	1,059		8.9	%

Salaries and employee benefits expense increased ~~$1.3~~$1.1 million for the first ~~nine~~six months of ~~2016~~2017 as compared to the same period in ~~2015.~~2016. The number of employees increased from ~~September~~June 30, ~~2015~~2016 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, as we added employees to support our ~~core conversion project and~~ branch expansions. ~~Occupancy and equipment expense~~Data processing increased by ~~$424,000 as a result of the addition of three leases for the Mill Creek, Edmonds, and Renton Landing branches.~~

The loss on sale of OREO properties resulted in an increase to noninterest expense of $618,000 in the first nine months of 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015. During the first nine months of 2015, sales of seven OREO properties for $5.5 million generated a $531,000 net gain. In comparison, for the same period in 2016, sales of two OREO properties plus a portion of a multi-parcel property for $988,000 generated a net loss of $87,000. In addition, market valuation adjustments to properties in our OREO inventory resulted in additional $257,000 expense for the first nine months of 2016 as compared to only $5,000 for the same period in 2015. A land development project in Kitsap County was written down based on a purchase and sale agreement received in the first quarter of 2016. The sale subsequently fell through, but was deemed to represent the market value of the property.

~~General and administrative expenses decreased by $254,000~~$318,000 primarily as a result of the ~~$201,000 recapture~~cost of data conversion related to our pending acquisition of four retail branches. These increases were partially offset by a $207,000 decrease in OREO market value adjustments. During the ~~reserve for unfunded commitments for~~first six months of 2016, we reduced the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016~~carrying value of OREO properties by $257,000 primarily as ~~compared to a $253,000 expense for~~ the nine months ended September 30, 2015. During 2016, the Company modified the calculation methodology for the reserve based on the strong credit quality of its loan portfolio. Partially offsetting this decrease, subscription expense increased by $43,000 and state taxes increased by $47,000 as a result of ~~increased taxable income and~~a sales contract on one property. The sale fell through in 2016, however a new ~~local taxes~~sale contract was agreed on during the first six months of 2017, resulting in ~~2016.~~a $50,000 additional write-down.

Federal Income Tax Expense. Our statutory income tax rate is 35%. We recorded federal income tax provisions of ~~$2.4~~$1.7 million and ~~$3.4~~$1.5 million for the ~~year-to-date~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, and ~~2015~~2016 as a result of our consolidated net income. Our effective tax rate for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, 2017 was 30.3% partially as a result of tax benefit from the exercise of stock options earlier in 2017. In comparison, the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was ~~30.1%~~32.1% as ~~partially~~ a result of the reversal of noninterest income and a tax penalty from the early surrender of a BOLI ~~policy, as discussed above. In addition, our tax provision was net of~~policies, partially offset by a ~~$213,000~~ benefit from ~~utilizing an otherwise expiring capital loss carryforward for our 2015 tax return that was filed in September 2016.~~the exercise of stock options.

Liquidity

We are required to have enough cash flow in order to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure a safe and sound operation. We maintain cash flows above the minimum level believed to be adequate to meet the requirements of normal operations, including potential deposit outflows. On a daily basis, we review and update cash flow projections to ensure that adequate liquidity is maintained.

Our primary sources of funds are customer deposits, cash flow from the loan and investment portfolios, advances from the FHLB, and to a lesser extent, brokered certificates of deposit. These funds, together with equity, are used to make loans, acquire investment securities and other assets, and fund continuing operations. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, retail certificates of deposit scheduled to mature in one year or less totaled ~~$162.9~~$155.3 million. ~~Management's~~Management’s practice is to maintain deposit rates at levels that are competitive with other local financial institutions. While maturities and the scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by the level of interest rates, economic conditions

and competition. We measure our liquidity based on our ability to fund our assets and to meet liability obligations when they come due. Liquidity (and funding) risk occurs when funds cannot be raised at reasonable prices or in a reasonable time frame to meet our normal or unanticipated obligations. We regularly monitor the mix between our assets and our liabilities to manage effectively our liquidity and funding requirements.

When deposits are not readily available and/or cost effective to provide the funds for our assets, we use alternative funding sources. These sources include, but are not limited to: advances from the FHLB, wholesale funding, national certificates of deposit listing services, brokered deposits, federal funds purchased and dealer repurchase agreements, as well as other short-term alternatives. These funding sources are generally collateral dependent. We may also liquidate assets to meet our funding needs.

The balance of our investments available-for-sale increased ~~$4.3~~$4.7 million from December 31, ~~2015~~2016, to ~~$133.9~~$134.0 million at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, and represents a ready source of cash if needed. The balance of our interest-earning deposits with banks decreased by ~~$73.3~~$14.6 million from December 31, ~~2015~~2016 to ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, as we shifted cash into higher yielding assets. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Bank maintained credit facilities with the FHLB totaling ~~$348.5~~$370.4 million, with an outstanding balance of ~~$221.5~~$191.5 million. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, we also had available a total of $35.0 million credit facilities with other financial institutions, with no balance outstanding. For additional information, see the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

To assist in our funds acquisition and interest rate risk management efforts, management utilizes the national brokered deposit market and maintained a balance at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 of $75.5 million of brokered certificates of deposit. In contrast to most retail certificate of deposit offerings which provide the depositor with an option to withdraw their funds prior to maturity, subject to an early withdrawal penalty, certificates of deposit acquired in the brokered market limits the depositor ability to withdraw the funds before the end of the term (except in the case of death or adjudication of incompetence of a depositor) which greatly reduces early redemption risk associated with retail deposits. This strategy may include, but is not necessarily limited to, raising longer term deposits (with terms greater than three years) that assist the Bank in its interest rate risk management efforts. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, brokered certificates of deposit had a remaining ~~weighted-average~~ maturity of ~~2.8 years.~~13 to 43 months. Most of these certificates also provide the Bank the option to redeem the deposit after six months, a favorable distinction compared to retail certificate of deposit terms that are offered in our local market. With these redemption limitations and call features, the cost of these brokered deposits is generally higher than our retail certificate of deposit offerings. Consequently, as we increase our brokered deposits, our cost of funds may increase.

First Financial Northwest is a separate legal entity from the Bank and, on a stand-alone level, must provide for its own liquidity and pay its own operating expenses and cash dividends. First Financial Northwest's primary sources of funds consist of dividends from the Bank, although there are regulatory ~~restrictions on~~requirements related to the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company (on an unconsolidated basis) had liquid assets of ~~$25.8~~$17.7 million and short-term liabilities of ~~$156,000.~~$153,000.

On a monthly basis, we estimate our liquidity sources and needs for the next six months. Also, we determine funding concentrations and our need for sources of funds other than deposits. This information is used by our Asset/Liability Management Committee ~~("ALCO"~~(“ALCO”) in forecasting funding needs and investing opportunities. We believe that our current liquidity position and our expected operating results are sufficient to fund all of our existing commitments.

Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and the unused portions of lines of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit and lines of credit are not recorded as an asset or liability by us until the instrument is exercised. At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, we had no commitments to originate loans for sale.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the loan agreement. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each ~~customer's~~customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of the collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us upon the extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the customer. The amount and type of collateral required varies, but may include real estate and income-producing commercial properties.

The following table summarizes our outstanding commitments to advance additional amounts pursuant to outstanding lines of credit and to disburse funds related to our construction loans at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016:~~2017:



			Amount of Commitment Expiration
	Total Amounts Committed		Through One Year		After One Through Three Years		After Three Through Five Years		After Five Years
	(In thousands)
Unused portion of lines of credit	$	24,136	$	1,584	$	14,746	$	3,321	$	4,485
Undisbursed portion of construction loans	88,475		37,420		51,055		—		—
Total commitments	$	112,611	$	39,004	$	65,801	$	3,321	$	4,485

Amount of Commitment Expiration
Total Amounts Committed Through One Year After One Through Three Years After Three Through Five Years After Five Years
(In thousands)
Unused portion of lines of credit $ 19,971
$ 2,528
$ 11,749
$ 3,452
$ 2,242
Undisbursed portion of construction loans 68,492
28,920
39,572
—
—
Total commitments $ 88,463
$ 31,448
$ 51,321
$ 3,452
$ 2,242

We anticipate that we will continue to have sufficient funds and alternative funding sources to meet our current commitments.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Bank had ~~three~~four operating leases with initial terms of 5five to ~~5.5~~eight years ~~and~~which carry minimum lease payments of ~~$14,000~~$18,000 per month. All ~~three~~four leases offer extension periods. The Bank signed a fifth lease agreement in April 2017 for the new branch office in Bothell, Washington that is expected to open in the fourth quarter of 2017. With the pending acquisition of four retail branches, the Bank will assume the leases for the Woodinville, Lake Stevens, and Smokey Point locations when the acquisition is scheduled to close during the third quarter of 2017, subject to DFI approval and other customary closing conditions.

First Financial Northwest and its subsidiaries from time to time are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. There are currently no matters that in the opinion of management would have a material adverse effect on First Financial Northwest’s consolidated financial position, results of operation, or liquidity.

Capital

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016, stockholders'~~2017, stockholders’ equity totaled ~~$151.1~~$143.5 million, or ~~14.06%~~13.27% of total assets. Our book value per share of common stock was ~~$12.70~~$13.00 at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017, compared to ~~$12.40~~$12.63 at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. Consistent with our goal to operate a sound and profitable financial organization, we actively seek to maintain a “well-capitalized” status in accordance with regulatory standards.

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, the Bank and consolidated Company exceeded all regulatory capital requirements and the Bank was considered ~~"well capitalized"~~“well capitalized” under regulatory capital guidelines of the FDIC. The following table provides our capital requirements and actual results.


	At September 30, 2016												At June 30, 2017
	Actual				For Minimum Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be Categorized as "Well Capitalized"				Actual				For Minimum Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be Categorized as “Well Capitalized”
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Tier I leverage capital (to average assets)
Bank only	$	117,333	11.37	%	$	41,275	4.00	%	$	51,594	5.00	%	$	122,001	11.46	%	$	42,591	4.00	%	$	53,239	5.00	%
Consolidated	150,723		14.60		41,292		4.00		51,615		5.00		144,498		13.55		42,663		4.00		53,328		5.00
Common equity tier I ("CET1") (to risk-weighted assets)
Bank only	117,333		13.13		40,215		4.50		58,088		6.50		122,001		13.95		39,362		4.50		56,856		6.50
Consolidated	150,723		16.81		40,356		4.50		58,292		6.50		144,498		16.48		39,460		4.50		56,998		6.50
Tier I risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Bank only	117,333		13.13		53,620		6.00		71,493		8.00		122,001		13.95		52,483		6.00		69,977		8.00
Consolidated	150,723		16.81		53,808		6.00		71,744		8.00		144,498		16.48		52,614		6.00		70,152		8.00
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Bank only	128,505		14.38		71,493		8.00		89,366		10.00		132,944		15.20		69,977		8.00		87,471		10.00
Consolidated	161,936		18.06		71,744		8.00		89,680		10.00		155,469		17.73		70,152		8.00		87,690		10.00

In addition to the minimum CET1, Tier 1 ~~and~~ total capital and leverage ratios, the Bank ~~will have~~is required to maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional CET1 capital ~~equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets~~ above the required minimum levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses based on percentages of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions. This new capital conservation buffer requirement began to be phased in starting in January 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and will increase each year until fully implemented to an amount equal to 2.5% of risk-weighted assets in January 2019.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

General. Our Board of Directors has approved an asset/liability management policy to guide management in maximizing net interest income by managing the differences in terms between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities while maintaining acceptable levels of liquidity, capital adequacy, interest rate sensitivity, credit risk, and profitability. The policy established an ALCO, comprised of certain members of senior management and the Board of Directors. The ~~Committee's~~Committee’s purpose is to manage, coordinate, and communicate our asset/liability position consistent with our business plan and Board-approved policy. The ALCO meets quarterly to review various areas including:

economic conditions;

interest rate outlook;

asset/liability mix;

interest rate risk sensitivity;

current market opportunities to promote specific products;

historical financial results;

projected financial results; and

capital position.

Additionally, the Committee reviews current and projected liquidity needs. As part of its procedures, the ALCO regularly reviews our interest rate risk by modeling the impact that changes in interest rates may have on earnings, particularly net interest income. The market value of portfolio equity, which is the net present value of an ~~institution's~~institution’s existing assets less its liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, is also modeled under several scenarios of changing interest rates. In both cases, results are evaluated and compared with the maximum potential change that is authorized by the Board of Directors.

Our Risk When Interest Rates Change. The rates of interest we earn on assets and pay on liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market interest rates change over time. Our loans generally have longer maturities than our deposits. Accordingly, our results of operations, like those of other financial institutions, are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities. The risk associated with changes in interest rates and our ability to adapt to these changes is known as interest rate risk and is our most significant market risk.

We have utilized the following strategies in our efforts to manage interest rate risk:

•we are originating shorter term higher yielding loans, whenever possible;

we have attempted, where possible, to extend the maturities of our deposits which typically fund our long-term assets;

•we have invested in securities with relatively short average lives, generally less than eight years; ~~and,~~

•we have added adjustable-rate ~~securities~~loans to our ~~investment portfolio.~~loan portfolio;

•we have added brokered certificates of deposit with a call option as a new funding source; and

•we have utilized an interest rate swap to effectively fix the rate on $50.0 million of FHLB advances.

We have evaluated the use of derivative instruments to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower our cost of borrowing while taking into account variable interest rate risk. ~~At September 30, 2016, we did not have any derivative financial instruments or trading accounts for any class of financial instruments, however, on~~On October 25, 2016, the Bank entered into a Cash Flow Hedge ~~agreement. For more information, see Note 11 - Subsequent Events, Cash Flow Hedge, in Item 1~~agreement to effectively fix the rate on $50.0 million of ~~this report.~~FHLB advances. We are using this interest rate ~~swaps~~swap as a tool to lower the cost of certain FHLB advances as compared to the fixed rates offered by the FHLB for its longer term advances. At June 30, 2017, pursuant to the Cash Flow Hedge agreement we held a $50.0 million notional pay fixed, receive floating cash flow hedge. The Bank pays a fixed rate of 1.34% for five years and in turn, will receive an interest payment based on three-month LIBOR, which resets quarterly. The hedge instrument is a $50.0 million FHLB fixed-rate three-month advance that is renewed at the fixed rate at that time. Entering into this hedge agreement has allowed the Bank to secure fixed rate funding at a lower cost than a traditional five-year fixed rate FHLB advance. We will continue to review similar instruments and may utilize them for interest rate risk management in the future.

Interest rate contracts, however, may expose us to the risk of loss associated with variations in the spread between the interest rate contract and the hedged item. In addition, these contracts carry volatility risk that the expected uncertainty relating to the price of the underlying asset differs from what is anticipated. If any interest rate swaps we enter into prove ineffective, it could

result in volatility in our operating results, including potential losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.

Brokered Deposits. During the third quarter of 2014, management added the national brokered deposit market as an additional source of funds and to assist efforts in managing interest rate risk. Utilizing brokered deposits might result in increased regulatory scrutiny, as such deposits are not viewed as favorably as core retail deposits and there can be no assurance that the Bank will be allowed to include brokered deposits in its deposit mix in the future. While management will attempt to weigh the benefits of brokered deposits against the costs and risks, there can be no assurance that its conclusions will necessarily be aligned with those of the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s regulators.

How We Measure the Risk of Interest Rate Changes. We monitor our interest rate sensitivity on a quarterly basis to measure the change in net interest income in varying rate environments. Management uses various assumptions to evaluate the sensitivity of our operations to changes in interest rates. Although management believes these assumptions are reasonable, the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities on net interest income and the market value of portfolio equity could vary substantially if different assumptions were used or actual experience differs from these assumptions. Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react differently to changes in market interest rates. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities lag behind changes in market interest rates. Non-uniform changes and fluctuations in market interest rates across various maturities will also affect the results presented. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. A portion of our adjustable-rate loans have interest rate floors below which the ~~loan's~~loan’s contractual interest rate may not adjust. Approximately ~~42.8%~~45.3% of our total loans, net LIP, were adjustable-rate loans at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. At that date, ~~$196.0~~$105.2 million, or ~~53.3%~~26.5% of these loans were at their floor, with a weighted-average interest rate of ~~4.3%~~4.01%.

The inability of our loans to adjust downward can contribute to increased income in periods of declining interest rates. However, when loans are at their floors, there is a risk that our interest income may not increase as rapidly as our cost of funds during periods of increasing interest rates. Furthermore, in the event of a significant change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate from those assumed. Finally, the ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase. We consider all these factors in monitoring our interest rate exposure.

The assumptions we use are based upon a combination of proprietary and market data that reflect historical results and current market conditions. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayments, deposit decay rates and the market value of certain assets under the various interest rate scenarios. We use market data to determine prepayments and maturities of loans, investments and borrowings and use our own assumptions on deposit decay rates. The exception to this is time deposits, which are modeled to reprice to market rates upon their stated maturities. We also assume that non-maturity deposits can be maintained with rate adjustments not directly proportionate to the change in market interest rates, based upon our historical deposit decay rates which are substantially lower than market decay rates. We have demonstrated in the past that the tiering structure of our deposit accounts during changing rate environments results in relatively lower volatility and less than market rate changes in our interest expense for deposits. We tier our deposit accounts by balance and rate, whereby higher balances within an account earn higher rates of interest. Therefore, deposits that are not very rate sensitive (generally, lower balance tiers) are separated from deposits that are rate sensitive (generally, higher balance tiers). When interest rates rise, we do not have to raise interest rates proportionately on less rate sensitive accounts to retain these deposits. These assumptions are based upon our analysis of our customer base, competitive factors and historical experience.

Our income simulation model examines changes in net interest income in which interest rates were assumed to remain at their base level, instantaneously increase by 100, 200 and 300 basis points or decline immediately by 100 basis points. Reductions of rates by 200 and 300 basis points were not reported due to the current low rate environment.

The following table illustrates the change in our net interest income at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 that would occur in the event of an instantaneous change in interest rates equally across all maturities, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement.


Net Interest Income Change at September 30, 2016
Net Interest Income Change at June 30, 2017					Net Interest Income Change at June 30, 2017
Basis Point Change in Rates	Net Interest Income		% Change			Net Interest Income		% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
+300	$	31,389	(9.81	)%		$	34,345	(1.65	)%
+200	32,553		(6.46	)		34,553		(1.06	)
+100	33,734		(3.07	)		34,817		(0.30	)
Base	34,802		—			34,922		—
(100)	35,465		1.91			34,797		(0.36	)

The following table illustrates the change in our net portfolio value (“NPV”) at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016~~2017 that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates equally across all maturities, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement.


Basis Point								Net Portfolio as % of				Market									Net Portfolio as % of				Market
Change in	Net Portfolio Value⁽¹⁾							Portfolio Value of Assets				Value of		Net Portfolio Value⁽¹⁾							Portfolio Value of Assets				Value of
Rates	Amount		$ Change ⁽²⁾			% Change		NPV Ratio ⁽³⁾		% Change ⁽⁴⁾		Assets ⁽⁵⁾		Amount		$ Change ⁽²⁾			% Change		NPV Ratio ⁽³⁾		% Change ⁽⁴⁾		Assets ⁽⁵⁾
	(Dollars in thousands)													(Dollars in thousands)
+300	$	128,269	$	(40,169	)	(23.85	)%	12.66	%	(3.68	)%	$	1,013,409	$	125,628	$	(33,700	)	(21.15	)%	12.46	%	(3.11	)%	$	1,008,238
+200	142,393		(26,045		)	(15.46	)	13.69		(2.39	)	1,039,876		136,764		(22,564		)	(14.16	)	13.24		(2.08	)	1,032,991
+100	156,958		(11,480		)	(6.82	)	14.71		(1.05	)	1,067,365		149,542		(9,786		)	(6.14	)	14.11		(0.90	)	1,060,033
Base	168,438		—			—		15.43		—		1,091,476		159,328		—			—		14.69		—		1,084,760
(100)	174,098		5,660			3.36		15.66		0.52		1,111,458		164,943		5,615			3.52		14.90		0.52		1,107,219

_____________

⁽¹⁾ The net portfolio value is the difference between the present value of the discounted cash flows of assets and liabilities and represents the market value of the ~~Company's~~Company’s equity for any given interest rate scenario. Net portfolio value is useful for determining, on a market value basis, how equity changes in response to various interest rate scenarios. Large changes in net portfolio value reflect increased interest rate sensitivity and generally more volatile earnings streams.

⁽²⁾ The increase or decrease in net portfolio value at the indicated interest rates compared to the net portfolio value assuming no change in interest rates.

⁽³⁾ Net portfolio value divided by the market value of assets.

⁽⁴⁾ The increase or decrease in the net portfolio value divided by the market value of assets.

⁽⁵⁾ The market value of assets represents the value of assets under the various interest rate scenarios and reflects the sensitivity of those assets to interest rate changes.

The net interest income and net portfolio value tables presented above are predicated upon a stable balance sheet with no growth or change in asset or liability mix. In addition, the net portfolio value is based upon the present value of discounted cash flows using our estimates of current replacement rates to discount the cash flows. The effects of changes in interest rates in the net interest income table are based upon a cash flow simulation of our existing assets and liabilities and assuming that delinquency rates would not change as a result of changes in interest rates, although there can be no assurance that this will be the case. Delinquency rates may change when interest rates change as a result of changes in the loan portfolio mix, underwriting conditions, loan terms or changes in economic conditions that have a delayed effect on the portfolio. Even if interest rates change in the designated amounts, there can be no assurance that our assets and liabilities would perform as set forth above. Also, a change in U.S. Treasury rates in the designated amounts accompanied by a change in the shape of the Treasury yield curve would cause changes to the net portfolio value and net interest income other than those indicated above.

At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, other than the interest rate swap we entered into through the Cash Flow Hedge agreement, we did not have any derivative financial instruments or trading accounts for any class of financial instruments, nor have we engaged in any other hedging activities or purchased off-balance sheet derivative instruments. However, we continue to review such instruments and may utilize them for interest rate risk management in the future. Interest rate risk continues to be one of our primary risks, as other types of risks, such as foreign currency exchange risk and commodity pricing risk do not arise in the normal course of our business activities and operations.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The management of First Financial Northwest, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives are met. Also, because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. As a result of these inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Furthermore, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

(a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and several other members of our senior management as of the end of the period covered by this report. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to our management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the ~~SEC's~~SEC’s rules and forms.


(b)	Changes in Internal Controls: In the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are engaged in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, none of which are currently considered to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our ~~2015~~2016 Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Not applicable

(b) Not applicable

(c) The following table summarizes First Financial ~~Northwest's~~Northwest’s common stock repurchases during the ~~third~~second quarter of ~~2016:~~2017, under the repurchase plan effective May 30, 2017 through November 30, 2017:

Period Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Repurchased Under the Plan
July 1 - July 31, 2016

—
—
—
August 1 - August 31, 2016 ⁽¹⁾
1,294,467
$ 14.00
1,294,467
N/A
September 1 - September 30, 2016 ⁽²⁾
137,500
14.06
137,500
1,362,500
1,431,967
1,431,967

⁽¹⁾~~On August 9, 2016, the Company completed the repurchase of $18.1 million in shares through a self-tender offer, announced July 13, 2016.~~



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Repurchased Under the Plan

April 1 - April 30, 2017	n/a	n/a		n/a	n/a
May 1 - May 31, 2017	—	—		—	1,100,000
June 1 - June 30, 2017	22,700	$	15.93	22,700	1,077,300
	22,700			22,700

⁽²⁾On ~~September 9, 2016,~~May 22, 2017, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to ~~1,500,000~~1,100,000 shares of the ~~Company's~~Company’s common stock, or ~~12.5%~~10% of the ~~Company's~~Company’s outstanding shares. ~~This~~Shares are repurchased under a pre-arranged stock trading plan ~~expires on March 27, 2017. For more information on this repurchase, see Note 11 - Subsequent Events - Stock Repurchase Plan~~ in ~~Item 1~~accordance with guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of ~~this report.~~

the Securities Exchange Act of 1034, as amended.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Exhibits



3.1			Articles of Incorporation of First Financial Northwest ⁽¹⁾
3.2			Amended and Restated Bylaws of First Financial Northwest ⁽²⁾
4.0			Form of stock certificate of First Financial Northwest⁽¹⁾
10.1			Amended Employment Agreement between First Savings Bank Northwest and Joseph W. Kiley III ⁽³⁾
10.2			Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement for Executive Officers ⁽⁴⁾
10.3			~~Form of~~Amended Executive Supplemental ~~Executive~~ Retirement Plan Participation Agreement ~~entered into by First Savings Bank~~ with Joseph W. Kiley III⁽⁵⁾
10.4			2008 Equity Incentive Plan ⁽⁶⁾
10.5			2016 Equity Incentive Plan ⁽⁷⁾
10.6			Forms of incentive and non-qualified stock option award agreements ⁽⁸⁾
10.7			Form of restricted stock award agreement ⁽⁸⁾
10.8			~~Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release with the Stilwell Group~~ ⁽⁹⁾
~~10.9~~			~~Amendment No. 1 to the Settlement Agreement and Releases with the Stilwell Group~~⁽¹⁰⁾
~~10.1~~			~~Amendment No. 2 to the Settlement Agreement and Releases with the Stilwell Group~~ ⁽¹¹⁾
~~10.11~~			Employment Agreement between First Savings Bank Northwest and Richard P. Jacobson ⁽³⁾
31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32			Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
101			The following materials from First Financial Northwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (2) Consolidated Income Statements; (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (4) Consolidated Statements of ~~Stockholders'~~Stockholders’ Equity; (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (6) Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

_____________


⁽¹⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-143539)


⁽²⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated ~~March 24, 2016.~~June 15, 2017.


⁽³⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial ~~Northwest's~~Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2013.


⁽⁴⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 9, 2014.


⁽⁵⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated ~~September 12, 2016.~~July 11, 2017.


⁽⁶⁾	Filed as Appendix A to First Financial Northwest’s definitive proxy statement dated April 15, 2008.


⁽⁷⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial ~~Northwest's~~Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2016.


⁽⁸⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2008.


⁽⁹⁾	~~Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest's Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 20, 2012.~~


⁽¹⁰⁾	~~Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest's Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 17, 2013.~~


⁽¹¹⁾	~~Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest's Current Report on Form 8-K dated February 26, 2013.~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC.

Date: ~~November 8, 2016~~August 7, 2017	By:	/s/Joseph W. Kiley III
		Joseph W. Kiley III
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



Date: ~~November 8, 2016~~August 7, 2017	By:	/s/Richard P. Jacobson
		Richard P. Jacobson
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: ~~November 8, 2016~~August 7, 2017	By:	/s/Christine A. Huestis
		Christine A. Huestis
		Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

Exhibit Index



Exhibit No.			Description
31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32			Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
101			The following materials from First Financial Northwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (2) Consolidated Income Statements; (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (4) Consolidated Statements of ~~Stockholders'~~Stockholders’ Equity; (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (6) Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.



	Three Months Ended September 30, 2015				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	3,114	$	49	$	3,215	$	131
Non-owner occupied	25,142		361		26,835		1,123
Multifamily	2,101		8		1,471		23
Commercial real estate	4,757		85		4,650		269
Consumer	125		2		121		3
Total	35,239		505		36,292		1,549

Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	2,131		12		2,240		89
Non-owner occupied	7,772		115		8,084		345
Multifamily	1,187		19		1,677		58
Commercial real estate	3,199		41		3,883		104
Consumer	77		—		78		2
Total	14,366		187		15,962		598

Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	5,245		61		5,455		220
Non-owner occupied	32,914		476		34,919		1,468
Multifamily	3,288		27		3,148		81
Commercial real estate	7,956		126		8,533		373
Consumer	202		2		199		5
Total	$	49,605	$	692	$	52,254	$	2,147