

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the quarterly period ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018

or
[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 001-33652


FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Washington		26-0610707
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

201 Wells Avenue South, Renton, Washington		98057
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:		(425) 255-4400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

YES X NO

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer _____	Accelerated filer X	Non-accelerated filer _____
Smaller reporting company _____	Emerging growth company _____

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. _____

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES NO X

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: Asas of August ~~3, 2017, 11,039,665~~6, 2018, 10,914,556 shares of the issuer’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share, were outstanding.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS



			Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3536
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	5457
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	5860
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	5860
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	5860
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	5860
	Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	5960
	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	5960
	Item 5.	Other Information	5961
	Item 6.	Exhibits	6062
SIGNATURES			6163

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands, except share data)

Part 1. Financial Information

Item 1. Financial Statements


	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			June 30, 2018			December 31, 2017
Assets
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)
Cash on hand and in banks	$	7,418		$	5,779		$	9,017		$	9,189
Interest-earning deposits with banks	10,996			25,573			14,056			6,942
Investments available-for-sale, at fair value	133,951			129,260			138,055			132,242
Loans receivable, net of allowance of $11,285 and $10,951	861,672			815,043
Loans receivable, net of allowance of $12,754 and $12,882							989,256			988,662
Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") stock, at cost	8,902			8,031			10,410			9,882
Accrued interest receivable	3,165			3,147			4,084			4,084
Deferred tax assets, net	2,620			3,142			1,296			1,211
Other real estate owned ("OREO")	1,825			2,331			483			483
Premises and equipment, net	19,501			18,461			21,436			20,614
Bank owned life insurance ("BOLI"), net	28,721			24,153			29,501			29,027
Prepaid expenses and other assets	2,937			2,664			4,391			5,738
Goodwill							889			889
Core deposit intangible							1,191			1,266
Total assets	$	1,081,708		$	1,037,584		$	1,224,065		$	1,210,229

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing deposits	$	35,126		$	33,422		$	51,454		$	45,434
Interest-bearing deposits	700,449			684,054			781,298			794,068
Total deposits	735,575			717,476			832,752			839,502
FHLB Advances	191,500			171,500			224,000			216,000
Advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance	2,183			2,259			2,545			2,515
Accrued interest payable	286			231			570			326
Other liabilities	8,650			7,993			11,644			9,252
Total liabilities	938,194			899,459			1,071,511			1,067,595

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders' Equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares; no shares issued or outstanding	—			—			—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 90,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 11,041,865 shares at June 30, 2017, and 10,938,251 shares at December 31, 2016	110			109
Common stock, $0.01 par value; authorized 90,000,000 shares; issued and outstanding 10,916,556 shares at June 30, 2018, and 10,748,437 shares at December 31, 2017							109			107
Additional paid-in capital	98,469			96,852			96,344			94,173
Retained earnings, substantially restricted	51,844			48,981			63,042			54,642
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax	(984		)	(1,328		)	(2,145		)	(928		)
Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan ("ESOP") shares	(5,925		)	(6,489		)	(4,796		)	(5,360		)
Total stockholders' equity	143,514			138,125			152,554			142,634
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,081,708		$	1,037,584		$	1,224,065		$	1,210,229

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Income Statements

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
Interest income
Loans, including fees	$	10,352		$	9,048		$	20,379		$	17,775		$	12,429		$	10,352		$	25,472		$	20,379
Investments available-for-sale	887			757			1,732			1,432			1,010			887			1,939			1,732
Interest-earning deposits with banks	42			47			86			160			44			42			82			86
Dividends on FHLB stock	62			44			144			91			105			62			208			144
Total interest income	11,343			9,896			22,341			19,458			13,588			11,343			27,701			22,341
Interest expense
Deposits	1,776			1,441			3,467			2,924			2,435			1,776			4,711			3,467
FHLB advances and other borrowings	570			272			1,015			570			1,024			570			1,877			1,015
Total interest expense	2,346			1,713			4,482			3,494			3,459			2,346			6,588			4,482
Net interest income	8,997			8,183			17,859			15,964			10,129			8,997			21,113			17,859
Provision for loan losses	100			600			300			500
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	8,897			7,583			17,559			15,464
(Recapture of provision) provision for loan losses													(400		)	100			(4,400		)	300
Net interest income after (recapture of provision) provision for loan losses													10,529			8,897			25,513			17,559
Noninterest income
Net gain on sale of investments	56			—			56			—
Net (loss) gain on sale of investments													(21		)	56			(21		)	56
BOLI income	116			225			317			391			224			116			473			317
Wealth management revenue	307			281			447			491			156			307			255			447
Deposit related fees													175			94			336			165
Loan related fees													126			155			260			275
Other	252			202			446			306			3			3			6			6
Total noninterest income	731			708			1,266			1,188			663			731			1,309			1,266
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits	4,409			3,841			8,694			7,615			4,931			4,409			9,593			8,694
Occupancy and equipment	579			488			1,059			996			829			579			1,598			1,059
Professional fees	482			561			921			1,029			442			482			770			921
Data processing	519			251			759			441			351			519			675			759
(Gain) loss on sale of OREO property, net	(5		)	89			(5		)	87
OREO market value adjustments	—			—			50			257
OREO related reimbursements, net	(15		)	(14		)	(25		)	(34		)
OREO related expenses (reimbursements), net													2			(20		)	3			20
Regulatory assessments	112			117			208			237			110			112			265			208
Insurance and bond premiums	98			86			197			174			154			98			260			197
Marketing	52			40			100			78			77			52			184			100
Other general and administrative	605			613			946			965			591			605			1,166			946
Total noninterest expense	6,836			6,072			12,904			11,845			7,487			6,836			14,514			12,904
Income before federal income tax provision	2,792			2,219			5,921			4,807			3,705			2,792			12,308			5,921
Federal income tax provision	924			779			1,709			1,542			603			924			2,364			1,709
Net income	$	1,868		$	1,440		$	4,212		$	3,265		$	3,102		$	1,868		$	9,944		$	4,212
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.18		$	0.12		$	0.41		$	0.26		$	0.30		$	0.18		$	0.97		$	0.41
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.18		$	0.11		$	0.40		$	0.26		$	0.30		$	0.18		$	0.96		$	0.40
Basic weighted average number of common shares outstanding	10,363,345			12,390,234			10,341,654			12,567,464			10,271,432			10,363,345			10,241,297			10,341,654
Diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding	10,500,829			12,530,720			10,503,023			12,718,155			10,405,949			10,500,829			10,372,474			10,503,023

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
Net income $ 1,868
$ 1,440
$ 4,212
$ 3,265
Other comprehensive income, before tax:
Gross unrealized holding gains on investments available-for-sale 453
866
829
2,308
Tax provision (159 ) (303 ) (290 ) (808 )
Reclassification adjustment for net gains realized in income (56 ) —
(56 ) —
Tax benefit 20
—
20
—
Loss on cash flow hedge (306 ) —
$ (243 ) $ —
Tax benefit 107
—
$ 84
$ —
Other comprehensive income, net of tax 59
563
$ 344
$ 1,500
Total comprehensive income $ 1,927
$ 2,003
$ 4,556
$ 4,765



	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017			2018			2017
Net income	$	3,102		$	1,868		$	9,944		$	4,212
Other comprehensive income, before tax:
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on investments available-for-sale	(929		)	453			(2,402		)	829
Tax benefit (provision)	195			(159		)	504			(290		)
Reclassification adjustment for net losses (gains) realized in income	21			(56		)	21			(56		)
Tax (provision) benefit	(4		)	20			(4		)	20
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedge	177			(306		)	840			(243		)
Tax (provision) benefit	(37		)	107			(176		)	84
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax	$	(577	)	$	59		$	(1,217	)	$	344
Total comprehensive income	$	2,525		$	1,927		$	8,727		$	4,556

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Dollars in thousands except share data)

(Unaudited)



	Shares		Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balances at December 31, 2016	10,938,251		$	109	$	96,852		$	48,981		$	(1,328	)	$	(6,489	)	$	138,125
Net income	—		—		—			4,212			—			—			4,212
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—			—			344			—			344
Exercise of stock options	115,880		1		1,132			—			—			—			1,133
Issuance of common stock - restricted stock awards	10,434		—		—			—			—			—			—
Compensation related to stock options and restricted stock awards	—		—		401			—			—			—			401
Allocation of 56,428 ESOP shares	—		—		446			—			—			564			1,010
Repurchase and retirement of common stock	(22,700	)	—		(362		)	—			—			—			(362		)
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.13 per share)	—		—		—			(1,349		)	—			—			(1,349		)
Balances at June 30, 2017	11,041,865		$	110	$	98,469		$	51,844		$	(984	)	$	(5,925	)	$	143,514

Shares Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings
Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income,
net of tax

Unearned
ESOP
Shares
Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balances at December 31, 2015 13,768,814
$ 138
$ 136,338
$ 42,892
$ (1,077 ) $ (7,618 ) $ 170,673
Net income —
—
—
3,265
—
—
3,265
Other comprehensive income —
—
—
—
1,500
—
1,500
Exercise of stock options 55,673
—
244
—
—
—
244
Issuance of common stock - restricted stock awards 14,052
—
—
—
—
—
—
Compensation related to stock options and restricted stock awards —
—
383
—
—
—
383
Allocation of 56,426 ESOP shares —
—
189
—
—
565
754
Repurchase and retirement of common stock (436,154 ) (4 ) (5,843 ) —
—
—
(5,847 )
Canceled common stock - restricted stock awards (74,478 ) (1 ) 1
—
—
—
—
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.12 per share) —
—
—
(1,517 ) —
—
(1,517 )
Balances at June 30, 2016 13,327,907
$ 133
$ 131,312
$ 44,640
$ 423
$ (7,053 ) $ 169,455

Shares Common
Stock Additional
Paid-in
Capital Retained
Earnings Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of tax Unearned
ESOP
Shares Total
Stockholders' Equity
Balances at December 31, 2016 10,938,251
$ 109
$ 96,852
$ 48,981
$ (1,328 ) $ (6,489 ) $ 138,125
Net income —
—
—
4,212
—
—
4,212
Other comprehensive income —
—
—
—
344
—
344
Exercise of stock options 115,880
1
1,132
—
—
—
1,133
Issuance of common stock - restricted stock awards, net 10,434
—
—
—
—
—
—
Compensation related to stock options and restricted stock awards —
—
401
—
—
—
401
Allocation of 56,428 ESOP shares —
—
446
—
—
564
1,010
Repurchase and retirement of common stock (22,700 ) —
(362 ) —
—
—
(362 )
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.13 per share) —
—
—
(1,349 ) —
—
(1,349 )
Balances at June 30, 2017 11,041,865
$ 110
$ 98,469
$ 51,844
$ (984 ) $ (5,925 ) $ 143,514



	Shares	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss, net of tax			Unearned ESOP Shares			Total Stockholders' Equity
Balances at December 31, 2017	10,748,437	$	107	$	94,173	$	54,642		$	(928	)	$	(5,360	)	$	142,634
Net income	—	—		—		9,944			—			—			9,944
Other comprehensive (loss) income	—	—		—		—			(1,217		)	—			(1,217		)
Exercise of stock options	137,940	1		1,364		—			—			—			1,365
Issuance of common stock - restricted stock awards, net	30,179	1		—		—			—			—			1
Compensation related to stock options and restricted stock awards	—	—		409		—			—			—			409
Allocation of 56,426 ESOP shares	—	—		398		—			—			564			962
Cash dividend declared and paid ($0.15 per share)	—	—		—		(1,544		)	—			—			(1,544		)
Balances at June 30, 2018	10,916,556	$	109	$	96,344	$	63,042		$	(2,145	)	$	(4,796	)	$	152,554

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

Six Months Ended June 30,
2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 4,212
$ 3,265
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:

Provision for loan losses 300
500
OREO market value adjustments 50
257
(Gain) loss on sale of OREO property, net (5 ) 87
Gain on sale of investments available-for-sale (56 ) —
Loss on sale of premises and equipment 23
—
Depreciation of premises and equipment 536
524
Amortization of premiums and discounts on investments available-for-sale, net 331
498
Deferred federal income taxes 336
309
Allocation of ESOP shares 1,010
754
Stock compensation expense 401
383
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI (317 ) (391 )
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets (516 ) 32
Net (decrease) increase in advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance (76 ) 350
Increase in accrued interest receivable (18 ) (190 )
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable 55
(21 )
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities 657
(591 )
Net cash provided by operating activities 6,923
5,766
Cash flows from investing activities:

Proceeds from sales of OREO properties 461
988
Proceeds from calls and sales of investments available-for-sale 4,742
430
Principal repayments on investments available-for-sale 5,253
8,203
Purchases of investments available-for-sale (14,188 ) (13,285 )
Net increase in loans receivable (46,929 ) (81,474 )
Purchase of FHLB stock (871 ) (1,494 )
Purchases of premises and equipment (1,599 ) (1,023 )
Surrender of BOLI —
10,182
Purchase of BOLI (4,251 ) (10,182 )
Net cash used by investing activities (57,382 ) (87,655 )
Cash flows from financing activities:

Net increase (decrease) in deposits 18,099
(15,197 )
Advances from the FHLB 40,000
160,000
Repayments of advances from the FHLB (20,000 ) (124,000 )
Proceeds from stock options exercises 1,133
244
Repurchase and retirement of common stock (362 ) (5,847 )
Dividends paid (1,349 ) (1,517 )
Net cash provided by financing activities 37,521
13,683

Continued



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018			2017
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	9,944		$	4,212
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
(Recapture of provision) provision for loan losses	(4,400		)	300
OREO market value adjustments	—			50
Gain on sale of OREO property, net	—			(5		)
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on investments	561			331
Loss (gain) on sale of investments available-for-sale	21			(56		)
Depreciation of premises and equipment	809			536
Loss on sale of premises and equipment	—			23
Deferred federal income taxes	239			336
Allocation of ESOP shares	962			1,010
Stock compensation expense	410			401
Increase in cash surrender value of BOLI	(473		)	(317		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets	2,262			(516		)
Net increase (decrease) in advance payments from borrowers for taxes and insurance	30			(76		)
Increase in accrued interest receivable	—			(18		)
Increase in accrued interest payable	244			55
Increase in other liabilities	2,392			657
Net cash provided by operating activities	13,001			6,923
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of OREO properties	—			461
Proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of investments available-for-sale	9,799			4,742
Principal repayments on investments available-for-sale	3,531			5,253
Purchases of investments available-for-sale	(22,107		)	(14,188		)
Net decrease (increase) in loans receivable	3,806			(46,929		)
Redemption of FHLB stock	(528		)	(871		)
Purchase of premises and equipment	(1,631		)	(1,599		)
Purchase of BOLI	—			(4,251		)
Net cash used by investing activities	(7,130		)	(57,382		)

Continued

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)



	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(12,938	)	$	(68,206	)



							Six Months Ended June 30,
							2018			2017
Cash flows from financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in deposits							$	(6,750	)	$	18,099
Advances from the FHLB							236,500			40,000
Repayments of advances from the FHLB							(228,500		)	(20,000		)
Proceeds from stock options exercises							1,365			1,133
Repurchase and retirement of common stock							—			(362		)
Dividends paid							(1,544		)	(1,349		)
Net cash provided by financing activities							1,071			37,521
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents							6,942			(12,938		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	31,352			105,711			16,131			31,352
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	18,414		$	37,505		$	23,073		$	18,414

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest paid	$	4,427		$	3,515		$	6,344		$	4,427
Federal income taxes paid	1,900			1,175			2,170			1,900

Noncash items:
Change in unrealized loss on investments available-for-sale	$	773		$	2,308		$	(2,381	)	$	773
Change in gain on cash flow hedge	(243		)	—			$	840		$	(243	)

See accompanying selected notes to consolidated financial statements.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Description of Business

First Financial Northwest, Inc. (“First Financial Northwest”), a Washington corporation, was formed on June 1, 2007 for the purpose of becoming the holding company for First Financial Northwest Bank ~~(“the Bank”~~(the “Bank”) in connection with the conversion from a mutual holding company structure to a stock holding company structure completed on October 9, 2007. First Financial Northwest’s business activities generally are limited to passive investment activities and oversight of its investment in First Financial Northwest Bank. Accordingly, the information presented in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying data, relates primarily to First Financial Northwest Bank. First Financial Northwest is a bank holding company, having converted from a savings and loan holding company on March 31, 2015, and as a bank holding company is subject to regulation by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. First Financial Northwest Bank is regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) and the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions (“DFI”).

As of June 30, 2018, First Financial Northwest Bank ~~is headquartered~~operated in ~~Renton,~~ten locations in Washington ~~where it has a full-service retail~~with the headquarters and four additional branch as well as a smaller branch located in a commercial development known as the “Landing”. Three additional, smaller branches are located in Mill Creek and Edmonds, both in Snohomish County, Washington and the community of Crossroads in Bellevue,locations in King County ~~Washington.~~and five branch locations in Snohomish County. The Bank ~~has received regulatory approval to open a new~~acquired four bank branches (one in King and three in Snohomish counties) and $74.7 million in retail deposits from Opus Bank on August 25, 2017. No loans were acquired in this transaction. The Bank’s newest branch opened in Bothell, ~~also~~Washington, in ~~King County, Washington, which is expected to open in the fourth quarter of 2017.~~April 2018. The Bank’s primary market area consists of King, Snohomish, Pierce and Kitsap counties, Washington. In addition to these de novo branches, the Bank has received FDIC, DFI and California Department of Business Oversight approvals on the acquisition of four Washington branches located in the Clearview area in Snohomish, the Smokey Point area in Arlington, and Lake Stevens, all in Snohomish County, and Woodinville, in King County. The acquisition is scheduled to close during the third quarter of 2017, subject to customary closing conditions.

The Bank is a portfolio lender, originating and purchasing one-to-four family residential, multifamily, commercial real estate, construction/land development, business, and consumer loans. Loans are primarily funded by deposits from the general public, supplemented by borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (“FHLB”) and deposits raised in the national brokered deposit market.

As used throughout this report, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” or the “Company” refer to First Financial Northwest, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiary First Financial Northwest Bank, unless the context otherwise requires.

Note 2 - Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, as filed with the ~~SEC.~~SEC (“2017 Form 10-K”). In our opinion, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP have been included. All significant intercompany balances and transactions between the Company and its subsidiaries have been eliminated in consolidation. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2017.~~2018. In preparing the unaudited consolidated financial statements, we are required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”), the valuation of other real estate owned (“OREO”) and the underlying collateral of impaired loans, deferred tax assets, and the fair value of financial instruments.

The Company’s activities are considered to be a single industry segment for financial reporting purposes. The Company is engaged in the business of attracting deposits from the general public and originating and purchasing loans for its portfolio. Substantially all income is derived from a diverse base of commercial, multifamily, and residential real estate loans, consumer lending activities, and investments.

Certain amounts in the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current unaudited financial statement presentation with no effect on consolidated net income or stockholders’ equity.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 3 - Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Recent Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2018

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) which postponed the effective date of 2014-09. Subsequently, in March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations. This amendment clarifies that an entity should determine if it is the principal or the agent for each specified good or service promised in a contract with a customer. In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing. The core principle of Topic 606 is that an entity must recognize revenue when it has satisfied a performance obligation of transferring promised goods or services to a customer. ~~The standard is~~These standards were effective ~~for public entities~~ for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, ~~2017; early adoption is not permitted.~~2017. The ~~standard allows for full retrospective adoption for all periods presented or modified retrospective adoption~~Company has analyzed its sources of noninterest income to ~~only~~determine when the ~~most current period presented in the financial statements. The cumulative effect of initially applying the standard is recognized at the date~~satisfaction of the ~~initial application. Our primary source~~performance obligation occurs and the appropriate recognition of ~~revenue is interest income, which is recognized as it is earned and is deemed to be in compliance with this ASU. With respect to noninterest income, the Company is in its preliminary stages~~revenue. The adoption of identifying and evaluating the revenue streams and underlying revenue contracts within the scope of the guidance. The Company is expecting to begin developing processes and procedures during 2017 to ensure it is fully compliant with these ~~amendments. To date, the Company has~~ASUs did not yet identified any significant changes in the timing of revenue recognition when considering the amended accounting guidance; however, the Company’s implementation efforts are ongoing and such assessments may change prior to the January 1, 2018 implementation date. Accordingly, the Company does not expect implementation of this standard to have a material impact on ~~our~~the Company’s consolidated financial statements. For more discussion on this topic, see Note 12 - Revenue Recognition in this report.

In January 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, Financial ~~Instruments--Overall,~~Instruments - Overall, Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income. In addition, the amendments in this ASU require an entity to disclose the fair value of its financial instruments using the exit price notion. Exit price is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The amendments in this ASU also require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in instrument-specific credit risk. In addition, the ASU eliminates the requirement to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet. The ASU also clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. The amendments in this ASU arewere effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ~~Early application is permitted for fiscal years or interim periods that have not yet been issued if adopted at the beginning of the fiscal year.~~ The Company ~~is reviewing our available-for-sale investment portfolio~~has updated the fair value disclosure on Note 7 in ~~accordance with the provision~~this report to reflect adoption of this ~~standard.~~standard, to include using the exit price notion in the fair value disclosure of financial instruments. The adoption of ASU 2016-01 isdid not ~~expected to~~ have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This ASU addresses the appropriate classification of eight specific cash flow issues on the cash flow statement. Debt prepayment costs should be classified as an outflow for financing activities. Settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments divides the interest portion as an outflow for operating activities and the principal portion as an outflow for financing activities. Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination should be classified as outflows for financing and operating activities. Proceeds from the settlement of bank-owned life insurance policies should be classified as inflows from investing activities. Other specific areas are identified in the ASU as to the appropriate classification of the cash inflows or outflows. The amendments in this ASU were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not currently have items on its cash flow statement that were impacted by adoption of this ASU and therefore adoption of ASU 2016-15 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805). This ASU clarifies the definition of a business to assist in determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of assets or businesses. The amendments in this ASU provide a screen to determine when a set of assets and activities is not a business, thereby reducing the number of transactions requiring further evaluation. If the screen is not met, the amendments in this ASU further provide a framework to evaluate if the criteria is present to qualify for a business. This ASU was effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Adoption of ASU 2017-01 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. The ASU was issued to provide clarity as to when to apply modification accounting when there is a change in the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. According to this ASU, an entity should account for the effects of a modification unless the fair value, vesting conditions, and balance sheet classification of the award is the same after the modification as compared to the original award prior to the modification. This ASU was effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company has not had any modifications on share-based payment awards and therefore the adoption of ASU No. 2017-09 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220). This ASU was issued to allow a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings from stranded tax effects resulting from the revaluation of the net deferred tax asset (“DTA”) to the new corporate tax rate of 21% as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Tax Act”). This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

adoption permitted. The Company adopted this ASU as of December 31, 2017, which resulted in reclassifying a net unrealized gain from the change in tax rate with an increase to accumulated other comprehensive income and a decrease to retained earnings by $41,000, respectively.

In March 2018, FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740). This ASU was issued to provide guidance on the income tax accounting implications of the Tax Act, and allows for entities to report provisional amounts for specific income tax effects of the Act for which the accounting under Topic 740 was not yet complete but a reasonable estimate could be determined. A measurement period of one-year is allowed to complete the accounting effects under Topic 740 and revise any previous estimates reported. Any provisional amounts or subsequent adjustments included in an entity’s financial statements during the measurement period should be included in income from continuing operations as an adjustment to tax expense in the reporting period the amounts are determined. The Company adopted this ASU with the provisional adjustments as reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements included in the 2017 Form 10-K. As of June 30, 2018, the Company did not incur any adjustments to the provisional recognition.

In June 2018, FASB issued ASU No. 2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718). This ASU was issued to expand the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. Previously, these awards were recorded at the fair value of consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued and was measured as the earlier of the commitment date or date performance was completed. The amendments in this ASU require the awards to be measured at the grant-date fair value of the equity instrument. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and early adoption is permitted once the entity has adopted Topic 606. The Company has adopted this ASU with the nonemployee share-based payment awards granted in June 2018, with no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU No. 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities arising from operating leases. A lessee should recognize a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. A lessee should include payments to be made in an optional period only if the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise an option to extend the lease or not to exercise an option to terminate the lease. For a finance lease, interest payments should be recognized separately from amortization of the right-of-use asset in the statement of comprehensive income. For operating leases, the lease cost should be allocated over the lease term on a generally straight-line basis. The amendments in ASU 2016-02 are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application of the amendments in the ASU is permitted. The effect of the adoption will depend on leases at the time of adoption. Once adopted, we expect to report higher assets and liabilities as a result of including right-of-use assets and lease liabilities related to certain banking offices ~~and certain equipment~~ under noncancelable operating lease agreements, however, based on current leases, the adoption is expected to increase our consolidated balance sheets by less than 5% and not to have a material impact on our regulatory capital ratios.

In June 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial ~~Instruments--Credit~~Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326). This ASU replaces the existing incurred loss impairment methodology that recognizes credit losses when a probable loss has been incurred with new methodology where loss estimates are based upon lifetime expected credit losses. The amendments in this ASU require a financial asset that is measured at amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The income statement would then reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets as well as changes to the expected credit losses that have taken place during the reporting period. The measurement of expected credit losses will be based on historical information, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that impact the collectability of the reported amount. ~~Available-for-~~

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

~~sale~~Available-for-sale securities will bifurcate the fair value mark and establish an allowance for credit losses through the income statement for the credit portion of that mark. The interest portion will continue to be recognized through accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. The change in allowance recognized as a result of adoption will occur through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the ASU is adopted. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is evaluating our current expected loss methodology of our loan and investment portfolios to identify the necessary modifications in accordance with this standard and expects a change in the processes and procedures to calculate the ALLL, including changes in assumptions and estimates to consider expected credit losses over the life of the loan versus the current accounting practice that utilizes the incurred loss model. A valuation adjustment to our ALLL or investment portfolio that is identified in this process will be reflected as a one-time adjustment in equity rather than earnings. We are ~~evaluating~~in the ~~potential impact adoption~~process of ~~this standard~~compiling historical data that will ~~have~~be used to calculate expected credit losses on our ~~consolidated financial statements and expect to shortly begin developing and implementing processes and procedures~~loan portfolio to ensure we are fully compliant with the ~~amendments~~ASU at the adoption ~~date. Once adopted,~~date and are evaluating the potential impact adoption of

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

this ASU will have on our consolidated financial statements. The Company intends to adopt ASU 2016-13 in the first quarter of 2020, and as a result, we expect our allowance for loan losses to ~~increase, however, until~~increase. Until our evaluation is complete, however, the magnitude of the increase will not be ~~unknown.~~known.

~~In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15,~~ ~~Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments~~. This ASU was to address the appropriate classification of eight specific cash flow issues on the cash flow statement. Debt prepayment costs should be classified as an outflow for financing activities. Settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments divides the interest portion as an outflow for operating activities and the principal portion as an outflow for financing activities. Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination should be classified as outflows for financing and operating activities. Proceeds from the settlement of bank-owned life insurance policies should be classified as inflows from investing activities. Other specific areas are identified in the ASU as to the appropriate classification of the cash inflows or outflows. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted and must be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company is evaluating our current cash flow statement classifications in accordance with the standard. Adoption of ASU 2016-15 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~In January 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-01,~~ ~~Business Combinations (Topic 805)~~. This ASU clarifies the definition of a business to assist in determining whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) or assets or businesses. The amendments in this ASU provide a screen to determine when a set of assets and activities is not a business, thereby reducing the number of transactions requiring further evaluation. If the screen is not met, the amendments in this ASU further provide a framework to evaluate if the criteria is present to qualify for a business. This ASU is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. Adoption of ASU 2017-01 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~In January 2017, FASB issued ASU 2017-03,~~ ~~Accounting Changes and Error Corrections (Topic 250) and Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323)~~. The ASU amends the Codification for SEC staff announcements made at recent Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meetings. The SEC guidance that specifically relates to the Company’s consolidated financial statements was from the September 2016 meeting, where the SEC staff expressed their expectations about the extent of disclosures registrants should make about the effects of the new FASB guidance as well as any amendments issued prior to adoption, in particular on revenue (ASU 2014-09), leases (ASU 2016-02) and credit losses on financial instruments (ASU 2016-13) in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 11.M. Registrants are required to disclose the effect that recently issued accounting standards will have on their financial statements when adopted in a future period. In cases where a registrant cannot reasonably estimate the impact of the adoption, then additional qualitative disclosures should be considered. The ASU incorporates these SEC staff views into Topic 250 and adds references to that guidance in the transition paragraphs of each of the three new standards. The Company has adopted the amendments in this ASU and appropriate disclosures have been included in this Note for each recently issued accounting standard.

In January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, ~~Intangibles--Goodwill~~Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350). This ASU simplifies the impairment calculation for subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating the step of comparing the implied fair value of a reporting unit’s goodwill with the carrying amount of that goodwill. Under the amendments in this ASU, an entity will evaluate the carrying amount of a reporting unit to its fair value, as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount that the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, not to exceed the amount of goodwill. The income tax effect should be considered for any tax deductible goodwill when measuring the impairment loss. ~~While the Company does not have any goodwill to recognize from any previous transaction, this ASU will apply to the impairment analysis of goodwill recognized in future transactions.~~ The amendments in this ASU are effective for goodwill impairment tests

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for reporting periods after January 1, 2017. The Company recognized goodwill from its recent branch acquisition and is adopting this ASU for the annual goodwill impairment test in 2018. Adoption of ASU 2017-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. The ASU shortens the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. The standard will take effect for SEC filers for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating its available-for-sale securities that fit the criteria of this ASU but has not yet quantified the impact. The adoption of ASU No. 2017-08 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In ~~May~~August 2017, FASB issued ASU No. ~~2017-09,~~2017-12, ~~Compensation--Stock Compensation~~Derivatives and Hedging (Topic ~~718): Scope of Modification Accounting~~815).~~. The~~ This ASU was issued to provide ~~clarity as~~investors better insight to ~~when~~an entity’s risk management hedging strategies by permitting companies to ~~apply modification~~recognize the economic results of its hedging strategies in its financial statements. The amendments in this ASU permit hedge accounting ~~when there is a change~~for hedging relationships involving non-financial risk and interest rate risk by removing certain limitations in cash flow and fair value hedging relationships. In addition, the ASU requires an entity to present the earnings effect of the hedging instrument in the ~~terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. According to this ASU, an entity should account for~~same income statement line item in which the ~~effects of a modification unless the fair value, vesting conditions, and balance sheet classification~~earnings effect of the ~~award~~hedged item is ~~the same after the modification as compared to the original award prior to the modification. The standard~~reported. This ASU is effective for ~~reporting periods~~fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2017, with~~2018, and early adoption is permitted. The Company intends to adopt this ASU during 2018, however its current cash flow hedge will not likely be impacted by the adoption of ASU ~~No. 2017-09~~2017-12, and consequently, is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 4 - Investments

Investments available-for-sale are summarized as follows at the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2017									June 30, 2018
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	46,664	$	164	$	(625	)	$	46,203	$	26,909	$	12	$	(1,023	)	$	25,898
Freddie Mac	15,865		87		(72		)	15,880		5,412		1		(129		)	5,284
Ginnie Mae	18,425		28		(559		)	17,894		20,805		—		(1,286		)	19,519
Municipal bonds	14,137		210		(29		)	14,318		13,852		68		(118		)	13,802
U.S. Government agencies	15,175		90		(127		)	15,138		51,202		84		(857		)	50,429
Corporate bonds	24,504		412		(398		)	24,518		23,488		189		(554		)	23,123
Total	$	134,770	$	991	$	(1,810	)	$	133,951	$	141,668	$	354	$	(3,967	)	$	138,055

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2016									December 31, 2017
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(In thousands)									(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	42,060	$	126	$	(854	)	$	41,332	$	26,961	$	69	$	(466	)	$	26,564
Freddie Mac	18,013		95		(99		)	18,009		5,510		18		(56		)	5,472
Ginnie Mae	19,133		41		(540		)	18,634		22,288		14		(726		)	21,576
Municipal bonds	13,203		11		(107		)	13,107		13,126		290		(21		)	13,395
U.S. Government agencies	15,937		75		(155		)	15,857		43,088		81		(536		)	42,633
Corporate bonds	22,506		241		(426		)	22,321		22,502		527		(427		)	22,602
Total	$	130,852	$	589	$	(2,181	)	$	129,260	$	133,475	$	999	$	(2,232	)	$	132,242

The tables below summarize the aggregate fair value and gross unrealized loss by length of time those investment securities have been continuously in an unrealized loss position at the dates indicated:

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~



	June 30, 2018
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss
	(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	18,866	$	(412	)	$	6,497	$	(611	)	$	25,363	$	(1,023	)
Freddie Mac	5,115		(129		)	—		—			5,115		(129		)
Ginnie Mae	5,874		(268		)	13,645		(1,018		)	19,519		(1,286		)
Municipal bonds	6,772		(118		)	—		—			6,772		(118		)
U.S. Government agencies	40,931		(734		)	1,703		(123		)	42,634		(857		)
Corporate bonds	—		—			6,946		(554		)	6,946		(554		)
Total	$	77,558	$	(1,661	)	$	28,791	$	(2,306	)	$	106,349	$	(3,967	)

June 30, 2017
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or Longer Total
Fair Value
Gross Unrealized
Loss
Fair Value
Gross Unrealized
Loss
Fair Value
Gross Unrealized
Loss
(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
   Fannie Mae $ 35,902
$ (625 ) $ —
$ —
$ 35,902
$ (625 )
   Freddie Mac 10,039
(72 ) —
—
10,039
(72 )
   Ginnie Mae 16,285
(559 ) —
—
16,285
(559 )
Municipal bonds 2,844
(29 ) —
—
2,844
(29 )
U.S. Government agencies 8,447
(127 ) —
—
8,447
(127 )
Corporate bonds 1,499
(2 ) 7,103
(396 ) 8,602
(398 )
Total $ 75,016
$ (1,414 ) $ 7,103
$ (396 ) $ 82,119
$ (1,810 )


	December 31, 2016															December 31, 2017
	Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total					Less Than 12 Months					12 Months or Longer					Total
	Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Gross Unrealized Loss
	(In thousands)															(In thousands)
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	34,763	$	(854	)	$	—	$	—		$	34,763	$	(854	)	$	15,202	$	(91	)	$	6,759	$	(375	)	$	21,961	$	(466	)
Freddie Mac	8,343		(99		)	—		—			8,343		(99		)	3,189		(56		)	—		—			3,189		(56		)
Ginnie Mae	16,734		(540		)	—		—			16,734		(540		)	6,454		(61		)	14,234		(665		)	20,688		(726		)
Municipal bonds	8,815		(107		)	—		—			8,815		(107		)	1,403		(21		)	—		—			1,403		(21		)
U.S. Government agencies	9,000		(153		)	1,426		(2		)	10,426		(155		)	33,268		(435		)	1,800		(101		)	35,068		(536		)
Corporate bonds	3,880		(119		)	4,693		(307		)	8,573		(426		)	1,499		(1		)	7,074		(426		)	8,573		(427		)
Total	$	81,535	$	(1,872	)	$	6,119	$	(309	)	$	87,654	$	(2,181	)	$	61,015	$	(665	)	$	29,867	$	(1,567	)	$	90,882	$	(2,232	)

On a quarterly basis, management makes an assessment to determine whether there have been any events or economic circumstances to indicate that a security on which there is an unrealized loss is impaired on an other-than-temporary basis. The Company considers many factors including the severity and duration of the impairment, recent events specific to the issuer or industry, and for debt securities, external credit ratings and recent downgrades. Securities on which there is an unrealized loss that

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

is deemed to be an other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) are written down to fair value. If the Company intends to sell a debt security, or it is likely that the Company will be required to sell the debt security before recovering its cost basis, the entire impairment loss would be recognized in earnings as an OTTI. If the Company does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not likely that it will be required to sell the debt security but does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the debt security, only the portion of the impairment loss representing credit losses would be recognized in earnings. The credit loss on a debt security is measured as the difference between the amortized cost basis and the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected. Projected cash flows are discounted by the original or current effective interest rate depending on the nature of the debt security being measured for potential OTTI. The remaining impairment related to all other factors, the difference between the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected and fair value, is recognized as a charge to other comprehensive income (“OCI”). Impairment losses related to all other factors are presented as separate categories within OCI. At June 30, ~~2017~~2018, and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, the Company had 4652 securities and 5336 securities in an unrealized loss position, ~~respectively. At June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had five~~respectively, with 13 of these securities ~~and four securities, respectively,~~ in an unrealized loss position for 12 months or ~~more.~~more at both dates. Management does not believe that any individual unrealized loss as of June 30, 2018, or December 31, 2017, represented OTTI. The decline in fair market value of these securities was generally due to changes in interest rates and changes in market-desired spreads subsequent to their purchase. Management also reviewed the financial condition of the entities issuing municipal or corporate bonds at June 30, ~~2017~~2018, and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, and determined that an OTTI charge was not warranted.

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investments available-for-sale at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Investments not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed investments, are shown separately.

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~


	June 30, 2017				June 30, 2018
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Due within one year	$	5,506	$	5,521	$	1,485	$	1,486
Due after one year through five years	4,915		4,918		9,200		9,202
Due after five years through ten years	24,652		24,739		19,690		19,269
Due after ten years	18,743		18,796		58,167		57,397
	53,816		53,974		88,542		87,354
Mortgage-backed investments	80,954		79,977		53,126		50,701
Total	$	134,770	$	133,951	$	141,668	$	138,055

Under Washington state law, in order to participate in the public funds program the Company is required to pledge eligible securities as collateral in an amount equal to 50% of the public deposits held less the FDIC insured amount. Investment securities with market values of ~~$21.7~~$14.8 million and ~~$22.6~~$14.2 million were pledged as collateral for public deposits at June 30, ~~2017~~2018, and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, respectively, both of which exceeded the collateral requirements established by the Washington Public Deposit Protection Commission.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, we had calls, sales, and maturities on investment securities of $7.8 million, and $9.8 million, respectively, generating a net loss of $21,000. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, we had calls and sales on investment securities of $4.7 million, generating a net gain of $56,000. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, we had calls on investment securities of $385,000, and $430,000, respectively, with no gain or loss. There were no sales of investments during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 5 - Loans Receivable

Loans receivable are summarized as follows at the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
One-to-four family residential:
Permanent owner occupied	$	137,816	$	137,834	$	169,275	$	148,304
Permanent non-owner occupied	118,816		111,601		134,297		130,351
	256,632		249,435		303,572		278,655

Multifamily	125,884		123,250		194,853		184,902

Commercial real estate	317,218		303,694		372,233		361,842

Construction/land:
One-to-four family residential	76,404		67,842		85,218		87,404
Multifamily	123,497		111,051		75,433		108,439
Commercial	1,100		—		5,735		5,325
Land	39,012		30,055		12,911		36,405
	240,013		208,948		179,297		237,573

Business	15,206		7,938		22,121		23,087
Consumer	9,031		6,922		12,329		9,133
Total loans	963,984		900,187		1,084,405		1,095,192

Less:
Loans in process ("LIP")	88,475		72,026		81,616		92,498
Deferred loan fees, net	2,552		2,167		779		1,150
Allowance for loan and lease losses ("ALLL")	11,285		10,951		12,754		12,882
Loans receivable, net	$	861,672	$	815,043	$	989,256	$	988,662

At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, loans totaling ~~$448.2~~$468.7 million were pledged to secure borrowings from the FHLB of Des Moines compared to ~~$472.1~~$422.6 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

ALLL. The Company maintains an ALLL as a reserve against probable and inherent risk of losses in its loan portfolios. The ALLL is comprised of a general reserve component for loans evaluated collectively for loss and a specific reserve component for loans evaluated individually. When an issue is identified and it is determined that the loan needs to be classified as nonperforming and/or impaired, an evaluation of the discounted expected cash flows is done and an appraisal may be obtained on the collateral. Based on this evaluation, additional provision for loan loss or charge-offs is recorded prior to the end of the financial reporting period.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following tables summarize changes in the ALLL and loan portfolio by loan type and impairment method at the dates and for the periods shown:

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~


	At or For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017																At or For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate			Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer			Total		One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land			Business			Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)																(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	2,542	$	1,188	$	4,027		$	2,791	$	311	$	299		$	11,158	$	3,237		$	1,884	$	4,490	$	2,454		$	740		$	331		$	13,136
Charge-offs	—		—		—			—		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—
Recoveries	27		—		—			—		—		—			27		6			—		—		12			—			—			18
Provision (recapture)	58		43		(294		)	151		146		(4		)	100		22			44		4		(345		)	(66		)	(59		)	(400		)
Ending balance	$	2,627	$	1,231	$	3,733		$	2,942	$	457	$	295		$	11,285	$	3,265		$	1,928	$	4,494	$	2,121		$	674		$	272		$	12,754

	At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017																At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate			Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer			Total		One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land			Business			Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)																(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	2,551	$	1,199	$	3,893		$	2,792	$	237	$	279		$	10,951	$	2,837		$	1,820	$	4,418	$	2,816		$	694		$	297		$	12,882
Charge-offs	—		—		—			—		—		—			—		—			—		—		—			—			—			—
Recoveries	33		—		—			—		—		1			34		4,246			—		14		12			—			—			4,272
Provision (recapture)	43		32		(160		)	150		220		15			300
(Recapture) provision																	(3,818		)	108		62		(707		)	(20		)	(25		)	(4,400		)
Ending balance	$	2,627	$	1,231	$	3,733		$	2,942	$	457	$	295		$	11,285	$	3,265		$	1,928	$	4,494	$	2,121		$	674		$	272		$	12,754

ALLL by category:
General reserve	$	2,446	$	1,231	$	3,710		$	2,942	$	457	$	295		$	11,081	$	3,191		$	1,928	$	4,484	$	2,121		$	674		$	272		$	12,670
Specific reserve	181		—		23			—		—		—			204		74			—		10		—			—			—			84

Loans: ⁽¹⁾
Total loans	$	256,632	$	125,884	$	316,675		$	152,082	$	15,206	$	9,031		$	875,510	$	303,572		$	194,853	$	371,690	$	98,224		$	22,121		$	12,329		$	1,002,789
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment ⁽²⁾	236,951		124,738		313,015			152,082		15,206		8,933			850,925		293,466			193,731		369,066		98,224			22,121			12,238			988,846
Loans individually evaluated for impairment ⁽³⁾	19,681		1,146		3,660			—		—		98			24,585		10,106			1,122		2,624		—			—			91			13,943

____________

⁽¹⁾Net of LIP.

⁽²⁾Loans collectively evaluated for general reserves.

⁽³⁾Loans individually evaluated for specific reserves.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	At or For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2016																		At or For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
	One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business			Consumer			Total			One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate			Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)																		(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	2,840		$	1,184	$	3,497	$	1,392	$	197		$	361		$	9,471		$	2,542	$	1,188	$	4,027		$	2,791	$	311	$	299		$	11,158
Charge-offs	—			—		—		—		—			—			—			—		—		—			—		—		—			—
Recoveries	63			—		—		—		—			—			63			27		—		—			—		—		—			27
Provision (recapture)	(156		)	10		274		488		20			(36		)	600			58		43		(294		)	151		146		(4		)	100
Ending balance	$	2,747		$	1,194	$	3,771	$	1,880	$	217		$	325		$	10,134		$	2,627	$	1,231	$	3,733		$	2,942	$	457	$	295		$	11,285

	At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016																		At or For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	One-to-Four Family Residential			Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business			Consumer			Total			One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate			Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer			Total
	(In thousands)																		(In thousands)
ALLL:
Beginning balance	$	3,028		$	1,193	$	3,395	$	1,193	$	229		$	425		$	9,463		$	2,551	$	1,199	$	3,893		$	2,792	$	237	$	279		$	10,951
Charge-offs	—			—		—		—		—			(19		)	(19		)	—		—		—			—		—		—			—
Recoveries	85			—		104		—		—			1			190			33		—		—			—		—		1			34
Provision (recapture)	(366		)	1		272		687		(12		)	(82		)	500
(Recapture) provision																			43		32		(160		)	150		220		15			300
Ending balance	$	2,747		$	1,194	$	3,771	$	1,880	$	217		$	325		$	10,134		$	2,627	$	1,231	$	3,733		$	2,942	$	457	$	295		$	11,285

ALLL by category:
General reserve	$	2,346		$	1,194	$	3,664	$	1,824	$	217		$	325		$	9,570		$	2,446	$	1,231	$	3,710		$	2,942	$	457	$	295		$	11,081
Specific reserve	401			—		107		56		—			—			564			181		—		23			—		—		—			204

Loans: ⁽¹⁾
Total loans	$	251,732		$	132,189	$	285,449	$	95,209	$	7,208		$	6,333		$	778,120		$	256,632	$	125,884	$	316,675		$	152,082	$	15,206	$	9,031		$	875,510
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment ⁽²⁾	220,597			130,610		281,002		94,715		7,208			6,226			740,358			236,951		124,738		313,015			152,082		15,206		8,933			850,925
Loans individually evaluated for impairment ⁽³⁾	31,135			1,579		4,447		494		—			107			37,762			19,681		1,146		3,660			—		—		98			24,585

_____________

⁽¹⁾ Net of LIP.

⁽²⁾ Loans collectively evaluated for general reserves.

⁽³⁾ Loans individually evaluated for specific reserves.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Past Due Loans. Loans are considered past due if a scheduled principal or interest payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, past due loans were ~~0.01%~~0.05% of total loans receivable, net of LIP. In comparison, past due loans were ~~0.06%~~0.01% of total loans receivable, net of LIP at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The following tables represent a summary of the aging of loans by type at the dates indicated:


	Loans Past Due as of June 30, 2017												Loans Past Due as of June 30, 2018
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}		30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	85	$	—	$	—	$	85	$	137,731	$	137,816	$	532	$	—	$	—	$	532	$	168,743	$	169,275
Non-owner occupied	—		—		—		—		118,816		118,816		—		—		—		—		134,297		134,297
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		125,884		125,884		—		—		—		—		194,853		194,853
Commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		316,675		316,675		—		—		—		—		371,690		371,690
Construction/land	—		—		—		—		152,082		152,082		—		—		—		—		98,224		98,224
Total real estate	85		—		—		85		851,188		851,273		532		—		—		532		967,807		968,339
Business	—		—		—		—		15,206		15,206		—		—		—		—		22,121		22,121
Consumer	—		—		—		—		9,031		9,031		—		—		—		—		12,329		12,329
Total loans	$	85	$	—	$	—	$	85	$	875,425	$	875,510	$	532	$	—	$	—	$	532	$	1,002,257	$	1,002,789

________________

⁽¹⁾ There were no loans 90 days and greater past due and still accruing interest at June 30, ~~2017~~2018.

⁽²⁾ Net of LIP.


	Loans Past Due as of December 31, 2016												Loans Past Due as of December 31, 2017
	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}		30-59 Days		60-89 Days		90 Days and Greater		Total Past Due		Current		Total ^{(1) (2)}
	(In thousands)												(In thousands)
Real estate:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	304	$	—	$	169	$	473	$	137,361	$	137,834	$	101	$	—	$	—	$	101	$	148,203	$	148,304
Non-owner occupied	—		—		—		—		111,601		111,601		—		—		—		—		130,351		130,351
Multifamily	—		—		—		—		123,250		123,250		—		—		—		—		184,902		184,902
Commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		303,694		303,694		—		—		—		—		361,299		361,299
Construction/land	—		—		—		—		136,922		136,922		—		—		—		—		145,618		145,618
Total real estate	304		—		169		473		812,828		813,301		101		—		—		101		970,373		970,474
Business	—		—		—		—		7,938		7,938		—		—		—		—		23,087		23,087
Consumer	—		—		—		—		6,922		6,922		—		—		—		—		9,133		9,133
Total loans	$	304	$	—	$	169	$	473	$	827,688	$	828,161	$	101	$	—	$	—	$	101	$	1,002,593	$	1,002,694

_________________

⁽¹⁾ There were no loans 90 days and greater past due and still accruing interest at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

⁽²⁾ Net of LIP.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Nonaccrual Loans. The following table is a summary of nonaccrual loans by loan type at the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
One-to-four family residential	$	528	$	798	$	116	$	128
Consumer	55		60		48		51
Total nonaccrual loans	$	583	$	858	$	164	$	179

During the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, interest income that would have been recognized had these nonaccrual loans been performing in accordance with their original terms was ~~$9,000~~$3,000 and ~~$18,000,~~$7,000, respectively. For the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, foregone interest on nonaccrual loans was ~~$13,000~~$9,000 and ~~$27,000,~~$18,000, respectively.

The following tables summarize the loan portfolio by type and payment status at the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2017														June 30, 2018
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction / Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Performing ⁽²⁾	$	256,104	$	125,884	$	316,675	$	152,082	$	15,206	$	8,976	$	874,927	$	303,456	$	194,853	$	371,690	$	98,224	$	22,121	$	12,281	$	1,002,625
Nonperforming ⁽³⁾	528		—		—		—		—		55		583		116		—		—		—		—		48		164
Total loans	$	256,632	$	125,884	$	316,675	$	152,082	$	15,206	$	9,031	$	875,510	$	303,572	$	194,853	$	371,690	$	98,224	$	22,121	$	12,329	$	1,002,789

_____________


⁽¹⁾	Net of LIP.


⁽²⁾	There were ~~$137.3~~$169.2 million of owner-occupied one-to-four family residential loans and ~~$118.8~~$134.3 million of non-owner occupied one-to-four family residential loans classified as performing.


⁽³⁾	The ~~$528,000~~$116,000 of one-to-four family residential loans classified as nonperforming are all owner-occupied.


	December 31, 2016														December 31, 2017
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total⁽¹⁾		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Performing ⁽²⁾	$	248,637	$	123,250	$	303,694	$	136,922	$	7,938	$	6,862	$	827,303	$	278,527	$	184,902	$	361,299	$	145,618	$	23,087	$	9,082	$	1,002,515
Nonperforming ⁽³⁾	798		—		—		—		—		60		858		128		—		—		—		—		51		179
Total loans	$	249,435	$	123,250	$	303,694	$	136,922	$	7,938	$	6,922	$	828,161	$	278,655	$	184,902	$	361,299	$	145,618	$	23,087	$	9,133	$	1,002,694

_____________

⁽¹⁾Net of LIP.

⁽²⁾There were ~~$137.0~~$148.2 million of owner-occupied one-to-four family residential loans and ~~$111.6~~$130.3 million of non-owner occupied one-to-four family residential loans classified as performing.

⁽³⁾The ~~$798,000~~$128,000 of one-to-four family residential loans classified as nonperforming are all owner-occupied.

Impaired Loans. A loan is considered impaired when we have determined that we may be unable to collect payments of principal or interest when due under the terms of the original loan document. There were no funds committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans at either June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, or December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following tables present a summary of loans individually evaluated for impairment by loan type at the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2017						June 30, 2018
	Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance ⁽²⁾		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance ⁽²⁾		Related Allowance
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	1,982	$	2,265	$	—	$	1,054	$	1,220	$	—
Non-owner occupied	12,664		12,679		—		5,366		5,366		—
Multifamily	1,146		1,146		—		1,122		1,122		—
Commercial real estate	2,913		2,990		—		2,248		2,248		—
Consumer	98		145		—		91		142		—
Total	18,803		19,225		—		9,881		10,098		—

Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	1,673		1,720		45		518		564		1
Non-owner occupied	3,362		3,383		136		3,168		3,189		73
Commercial real estate	747		747		23		376		377		10
Total	5,782		5,850		204		4,062		4,130		84

Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	3,655		3,985		45		1,572		1,784		1
Non-owner occupied	16,026		16,062		136		8,534		8,555		73
Multifamily	1,146		1,146		—		1,122		1,122		—
Commercial real estate	3,660		3,737		23		2,624		2,625		10
Consumer	98		145		—		91		142		—
Total	$	24,585	$	25,075	$	204	$	13,943	$	14,228	$	84

_________________

⁽¹⁾ Represents the loan balance less charge-offs.

⁽²⁾ Contractual loan principal balance.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	December 31, 2016						December 31, 2017
	Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance⁽²⁾		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment ⁽¹⁾		Unpaid Principal Balance⁽²⁾		Related Allowance
	(In thousands)						(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	2,216	$	2,475	$	—	$	1,321	$	1,516	$	—
Non-owner occupied	16,634		16,652		—		8,409		8,409		—
Multifamily	1,564		1,564		—		1,134		1,134		—
Commercial real estate	2,952		3,012		—		1,065		1,065		—
Consumer	103		148		—		94		144		—
Total	23,469		23,851		—		12,023		12,268		—

Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	1,896		1,965		51		522		568		5
Non-owner occupied	4,326		4,347		151		3,310		3,332		111
Commercial real estate	755		755		26		2,129		2,129		19
Construction/land	495		495		81
Total	7,472		7,562		309		5,961		6,029		135

Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	4,112		4,440		51		1,843		2,084		5
Non-owner occupied	20,960		20,999		151		11,719		11,741		111
Multifamily	1,564		1,564		—		1,134		1,134		—
Commercial real estate	3,707		3,767		26		3,194		3,194		19
Construction/land	495		495		81
Consumer	103		148		—		94		144		—
Total	$	30,941	$	31,413	$	309	$	17,984	$	18,297	$	135

_________________

⁽¹⁾ Represents the loan balance less charge-offs.

⁽²⁾ Contractual loan principal balance.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following ~~table presents~~tables present the average recorded investment in loans individually evaluated for impairment and the interest income recognized for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016:~~2017:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017				Six Months Ended June 30, 2017				Three Months Ended June 30, 2018				Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	1,997	$	30	$	2,070	$	61	$	1,180	$	18	$	1,227	$	36
Non-owner occupied	13,510		181		14,551		374		6,136		99		6,894		221
Multifamily	1,149		19		1,287		37		1,125		18		1,128		37
Commercial real estate	2,923		48		2,932		101		1,654		40		1,457		80
Consumer	99		2		100		4		92		2		93		4
Total	19,678		280		20,940		577		10,187		177		10,799		378

Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	1,781		20		1,819		43		519		9		520		18
Non-owner occupied	3,721		39		3,922		81		3,232		35		3,258		82
Commercial real estate	749		10		751		21		1,245		7		1,539		17
Construction/land	—		—		165		—
Total	6,251		69		6,657		145		4,996		51		5,317		117

Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	3,778		50		3,889		104		1,699		27		1,747		54
Non-owner occupied	17,231		220		18,473		455		9,368		134		10,152		303
Multifamily	1,149		19		1,287		37		1,125		18		1,128		37
Commercial real estate	3,672		58		3,683		122		2,899		47		2,996		97
Construction/land	—		—		165		—
Consumer	99		2		100		4		92		2		93		4
Total	$	25,929	$	349	$	27,597	$	722	$	15,183	$	228	$	16,116	$	495

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2016				Six Months Ended June 30, 2016				Three Months Ended June 30, 2017				Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Loans with no related allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	$	2,516	$	17	$	2,733	$	66	$	1,997	$	30	$	2,070	$	61
Non-owner occupied	22,084		286		22,484		605		13,510		181		14,551		374
Multifamily	1,584		26		1,194		53		1,149		19		1,287		37
Commercial real estate	2,251		35		2,392		76		2,923		48		2,932		101
Consumer	110		1		117		3		99		2		100		4
Total	28,545		365		28,920		803		19,678		280		20,940		577

Loans with an allowance:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	2,107		27		2,111		56		1,781		20		1,819		43
Non-owner occupied	5,496		62		6,171		139		3,721		39		3,922		81
Multifamily	—		—		393		—
Commercial real estate	2,207		34		2,211		70		749		10		751		21
Construction/land	495		5		495		9		—		—		165		—
Consumer	38		—		50		—
Total	10,343		128		11,431		274		6,251		69		6,657		145

Total impaired loans:
One-to-four family residential:
Owner occupied	4,623		44		4,844		122		3,778		50		3,889		104
Non-owner occupied	27,580		348		28,655		744		17,231		220		18,473		455
Multifamily	1,584		26		1,587		53		1,149		19		1,287		37
Commercial real estate	4,458		69		4,603		146		3,672		58		3,683		122
Construction/land	495		5		495		9		—		—		165		—
Consumer	148		1		167		3		99		2		100		4
Total	$	38,888	$	493	$	40,351	$	1,077	$	25,929	$	349	$	27,597	$	722

Troubled Debt Restructurings. Certain loan modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructured loans (“TDRs”). At June 30, 2018, the TDR portfolio totaled $13.8 million. At December 31, 2017, the TDR portfolio totaled $24.1 million, of which one loan of $106,000 was on nonaccrual status because it had previously not performed in accordance with the terms of its restructure. As of June 30, 2017, it was current, however it will remain on nonaccrual status until it has performed for six months and is expected$17.8 million. At both dates, all TDRs were performing according to continue to perform. At December 31, 2016, the TDR portfolio totaled $30.3 million, of which one loan of $174,000 was not performing in accordance with the terms of its restructure and was on nonaccrual status.

~~The following tables present loans that were~~their modified ~~as TDRs during the periods indicated and their recorded investment both before and after the modification:~~

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
(Dollars in thousands) (Dollars in thousands)
One-to-four family residential:
Principal and interest with interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date 7
1,968
1,968
7
1,968
1,968
Total 7
1,968
1,968
7
1,968
1,968

Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Number of Loans Pre-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment Post-Modification Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
(Dollars in thousands)
One-to-four family residential:
Principal and interest with interest rate concession 16
$ 3,155
$ 3,155
17
$ 3,711
$ 3,711
Commercial real estate:
Interest-only payments with interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date —
—
—
1
495
495
Total 16
$ 3,155
$ 3,155
18
$ 4,206
$ 4,206
repayment terms.

At June 30, ~~2017~~2018, the Company had no commitments to extend additional credit to borrowers whose loan terms have been modified in TDRs. All TDRs are also classified as impaired loans and are included in the loans individually evaluated for impairment as part of the calculation of the ALLL.

The TDRs that occurred during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and June 30, 2016, were all on existing TDRs and included extensions of existing interest rate concessions and advancing maturity dates for a period of time ranging from one to three years. No loans accounted for as TDRs were charged-off to the ALLL for the three ~~and six~~ months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017.

The following tables present TDR modifications for the periods indicated and their recorded investment prior to and after the modification:

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018					Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
Multifamily
Advancement of maturity date	1	$	1,124	$	1,124	1	$	1,124	$	1,124
Total	1	$	1,124	$	1,124	1	$	1,124	$	1,124



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017					Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Number of Loans	Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment		Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
	(Dollars in thousands)
One-to-four family residential
Principal and interest with interest rate concession and advancement of maturity date	7	$	1,968	$	1,968	7	$	1,968	$	1,968
Total	7	$	1,968	$	1,968	7	$	1,968	$	1,968

TDRs that default after they have been modified are typically evaluated individually on a collateral basis. Any additional impairment is charged to the ALLL. For the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, and June 30, ~~2016,~~2017, no loans that had been modified in the previous 12 months defaulted.

Credit Quality Indicators. The Company utilizes a nine-category risk rating system and assigns a risk rating for all credit exposures. The risk rating system is designed to define the basic characteristics and identify risk elements of each credit extension. Credits risk rated 1 through 5 are considered to be “pass” credits. Pass credits include assets, such as cash secured loans with funds on deposit with the Bank, where there is virtually no credit risk. Pass credits also include credits that are on the Company’s watch list, where the borrower exhibits potential weaknesses, which may, if not checked or corrected, negatively affect the borrower’s financial capacity and threaten their ability to fulfill debt obligations in the future. Credits classified as special mention are risk rated 6 and possess weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. Special mention assets do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification in the substandard, doubtful or loss categories. Substandard credits are risk rated

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

7. An asset is considered substandard if it is inadequately protected by the current net worth and payment capacity of the borrower or of any collateral pledged.

Substandard assets include those characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets classified as doubtful are risk rated 8 and have all the weaknesses inherent in those credits classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses present make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values. Assets classified as loss are risk rated 9 and are considered uncollectible and cannot be justified as a viable asset for the Company. There were no loans classified as doubtful or loss at June 30, ~~2017~~2018, and December 31, ~~2016.~~

2017.

The following tables represent a summary of loans by type and risk category at the dates indicated:

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	June 30, 2017														June 30, 2018
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Risk Rating:
Pass	$	253,095	$	125,884	$	313,856	$	152,082	$	15,206	$	8,788	$	868,911	$	301,137	$	194,853	$	369,071	$	98,224	$	22,121	$	12,281	$	997,687
Special mention	2,460		—		2,819		—		—		188		5,467		1,778		—		2,070		—		—		—		3,848
Substandard	1,077		—		—		—		—		55		1,132		657		—		549		—		—		48		1,254
Total loans	$	256,632	$	125,884	$	316,675	$	152,082	$	15,206	$	9,031	$	875,510	$	303,572	$	194,853	$	371,690	$	98,224	$	22,121	$	12,329	$	1,002,789

_____________

⁽¹⁾ Net of LIP.


	December 31, 2016														December 31, 2017
	One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction / Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Business		Consumer		Total ⁽¹⁾
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
Risk Rating:
Pass	$	245,237	$	123,250	$	300,655	$	136,427	$	7,938	$	6,674	$	820,181	$	275,653	$	184,902	$	358,285	$	145,618	$	23,087	$	8,893	$	996,438
Special mention	2,847		—		3,039		—		—		188		6,074		2,329		—		2,459		—		—		188		4,976
Substandard	1,351		—		—		495		—		60		1,906		673		—		555		—		—		52		1,280
Total loans	$	249,435	$	123,250	$	303,694	$	136,922	$	7,938	$	6,922	$	828,161	$	278,655	$	184,902	$	361,299	$	145,618	$	23,087	$	9,133	$	1,002,694

_____________

⁽¹⁾ Net of LIP.

Note 6 - Other Real Estate Owned

OREO includes properties acquired by the Company through foreclosure and deed in lieu of foreclosure. The following table is a summary of OREO activity during the periods shown:



	Three Months Ended June 30,					Six Months Ended June 30,
	2018		2017			2018		2017
	(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period	$	483	$	2,281		$	483	$	2,331
Gross proceeds from sale of OREO	—		(461		)	—		(461		)
Gain on sale of OREO	—		5			—		5
Market value adjustments	—		—			—		(50		)
Balance at end of period	$	483	$	1,825		$	483	$	1,825

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, there were no OREO properties sold and no market value adjustments taken on the remaining properties in OREO. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, a $50,000 market value adjustment was recognized prior to the sale of the one OREO property sold during that period. OREO at June 30, 2018, consisted of $483,000 in commercial real estate properties. At June 30, 2018, there were no loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,
2017 2016 2017 2016
(In thousands)
Balance at beginning of period $ 2,281
$ 3,405
$ 2,331
$ 3,663
Gross proceeds from sale of OREO (461 ) (985 ) (461 ) (988 )
Gain on sale of OREO 5
(89 ) 5
(87 )
Market value adjustments —
—
(50 ) (257 )
Balance at end of period $ 1,825
$ 2,331
$ 1,825
$ 2,331

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, one OREO property sold for $461,000, generating a gain on sale of $5,000. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, there were no market value adjustments taken on OREO properties. However, during the three months ended March 31, 2017, a $50,000 market value adjustment was recognized on the property that was subsequently sold during the second quarter of 2017. OREO at June 30, 2017 consisted of $1.8 million in commercial real estate properties. At June 30, 2017, there were no loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings were in process.

Note 7 - Fair Value

~~Fair~~The fair value of financial instruments presented in this note, with the exception of loans receivable, are based on the same methodology as presented in Note 7 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in the Company’s 2017 10-K. The Company has adopted ASU 2016-01, and therefore is ~~defined as~~measuring the fair value of loans receivable under the exit price ~~that would be received~~notion rather than the previous method of entry price notion. Under the entry price notion, the fair value estimate of loans receivable was based on discounted cash flow. At June 30, 2018, the exit price notion used to ~~sell an asset~~estimate the fair value of loans receivable was based on similar techniques, with the addition of current origination spreads, liquidity premiums, or ~~paid~~credit adjustments. The fair value of nonperforming loans is based on the underlying value of the collateral for periods prior to ~~transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.~~and after adoption of ASU 2016-01.

The Company determines the fair values of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair values. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect its estimate for market assumptions.

Valuation inputs refer to the assumptions market participants would use in pricing a given asset or liability using one of the three valuation techniques. Inputs can be observable or unobservable. Observable inputs are those assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the particular asset or liability. These inputs are based on market data and are obtained from an independent source. Unobservable inputs are assumptions based on the Company’s own information or estimate of assumptions used by market participants in pricing the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are based on the best and most current information available on the measurement date.

All inputs, whether observable or unobservable, are ranked in accordance with a prescribed fair value hierarchy:

Level 1 - Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.

Level 3 - Instruments whose significant value drivers are unobservable.

The tables below present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis (there were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 recurring measurements) at June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2017:



	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2018
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Investments available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	25,898	$	—	$	25,898	$	—
Freddie Mac	5,284		—		5,284		—
Ginnie Mae	19,519		—		19,519		—
Municipal bonds	13,802		—		13,802		—
U.S. Government agencies	50,429		—		50,429		—
Corporate bonds	23,123		—		23,123		—
Total available-for-sale investments	138,055		—		138,055		—
Derivative fair value asset	2,366		—		2,366		—
Total	$	140,421	$	—	$	140,421	$	—

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2017
Fair Value Measurements Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(In thousands)
Investments available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae $ 46,203
$ —
$ 46,203
$ —
Freddie Mac 15,880
—
15,880
—
Ginnie Mae 17,894
—
17,894
—
Municipal bonds 14,318
—
14,318
—
U.S. Government agencies 15,138
—
15,138
—
Corporate bonds 24,518
—
24,518
—
Total available-for-sale
investments 133,951
—
133,951
—
Derivative fair value asset 1,090
—
1,090
—
$ 135,041
$ —
$ 135,041
$ —


	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016								Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)								(In thousands)
Investments available-for-sale:
Mortgage-backed investments:
Fannie Mae	$	41,332	$	—	$	41,332	$	—	$	26,564	$	—	$	26,564	$	—
Freddie Mac	18,009		—		18,009		—		5,472		—		5,472		—
Ginnie Mae	18,634		—		18,634		—		21,576		—		21,576		—
Municipal bonds	13,107		—		13,107		—		13,395		—		13,395		—
U.S. Government agencies	15,857		—		15,857		—		42,633		—		42,633		—
Corporate bonds	22,321		—		22,321		—		22,602		—		22,602		—
Total available-for-sale investments	129,260		—		129,260		—		132,242		—		132,242		—
Derivative fair value asset	1,333		—		1,333		—		1,526		—		1,526		—
	$	130,593	$	—	$	130,593	$	—
Total									$	133,768	$	—	$	133,768	$	—

The estimated fair value of Level 2 investments is based on quoted prices for similar investments in active markets, identical or similar investments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.

The tables below present the balances of assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016:~~ 2017:



	Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2018
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans (included in loans receivable, net) ⁽¹⁾	$	13,859	$	—	$	—	$	13,859
OREO	483		—		—		483
Total	$	14,342	$	—	$	—	$	14,342

_____________


⁽¹⁾	Total fair value of impaired loans is net of $84,000 of specific reserves on performing TDRs.



	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2017
	Fair Value Measurements		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(In thousands)
Impaired loans (included in loans receivable, net) ⁽¹⁾	$	17,849	$	—	$	—	$	17,849
OREO	483		—		—		483
Total	$	18,332	$	—	$	—	$	18,332

_____________

⁽¹⁾ Total fair value of impaired loans is net of $135,000 of specific reserves on performing TDRs.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2017
Fair Value
Measurements Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1) Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2) Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(In thousands)
Impaired loans (included in loans
receivable, net) ⁽¹⁾
$ 24,381
$ —
$ —
$ 24,381
OREO 1,825
—
—
1,825
Total $ 26,206
$ —
$ —
$ 26,206

~~_____________~~


⁽¹⁾	~~Total fair value of impaired loans is net of $204,000 of specific reserves on performing TDRs.~~

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
Fair Value
Measurements Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1) Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2) Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
(In thousands)
Impaired loans (included in loans
receivable, net) ⁽¹⁾
$ 30,632
$ —
$ —
$ 30,632
OREO 2,331
—
—
2,331
Total $ 32,963
$ —
$ —
$ 32,963

~~_____________~~

⁽¹⁾ ~~Total fair value of impaired loans is net of $309,000 of specific reserves on performing TDRs.~~

The fair value of impaired loans reflects the exit price and is calculated using the collateral value method or on a discounted cash flow basis. Inputs used in the collateral value method include appraised values, less estimated costs to sell. Some of these inputs may not be observable in the marketplace. Appraised values may be discounted based on management’s knowledge of the marketplace, subsequent changes in market conditions, or management’s knowledge of the borrower.

OREO properties are measured at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value, less estimated costs to sell. Fair values are generally based on third party appraisals of the property, resulting in a Level 3 classification. In cases where the carrying amount exceeds the fair value, less estimated costs to sell, an impairment loss is recognized.

The following tables present quantitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements for financial instruments measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2017:

June 30, 2017

June 30, 2018

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input(s)

Range (Weighted Average)

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input(s)

Range (Weighted Average)

(Dollars in thousands)

Impaired Loans

24,381

Market approach

Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions

0.0% (0.0%)

13,859

Market approach

Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions

0.0%
(0.0%)

OREO

1,825

Market approach

Appraised value less selling costs

0.0% (0.0%)

483

Market approach

Appraised value less selling costs

0.0%
(0.0%)



	December 31, 2017
	Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input(s)	Range (Weighted Average)
	(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired Loans	$	17,849	Market approach	Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions	0.0% (0.0%)

OREO	$	483	Market approach	Appraised value less selling costs	0.0% (0.0%)

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows at the dates indicated:

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

December 31, 2016
Fair Value Valuation Technique Unobservable Input(s) Range (Weighted Average)
(Dollars in thousands)
Impaired Loans $ 30,632
Market approach Appraised value discounted by market or borrower conditions 0.0%
(0.0%)

OREO $ 2,331
Market approach Appraised value less selling costs 0.0%
(0.0%)

~~The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows at the dates indicated:~~

June 30, 2017
Estimated Fair Value Measurements Using:
Carrying Value Fair Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash on hand and in banks $ 7,418
$ 7,418
$ 7,418
$ —
$ —
Interest-earning deposits with banks 10,996
10,996
10,996
—
—
Investments available-for-sale 133,951
133,951
—
133,951
—
Loans receivable, net 861,672
864,725
—
—
864,725
FHLB stock 8,902
8,902
—
8,902
—
Accrued interest receivable 3,165
3,165
—
3,165
—
Derivative fair value asset 1,090
1,090
—
1,090
—

Financial Liabilities:

Deposits 315,059
315,059
315,059
—
—
Certificates of deposit, retail 345,028
345,058
—
345,058
—
Certificates of deposit, brokered 75,488
75,644
—
75,644
—
Advances from the FHLB 191,500
188,939
—
188,939
—
Accrued interest payable 286
286
—
286
—

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~



	June 30, 2018
			Estimated		Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash on hand and in banks	$	9,017	$	9,017	$	9,017	$	—	$	—
Interest-earning deposits with banks	14,056		14,056		14,056		—		—
Investments available-for-sale	138,055		138,055		—		138,055		—
Loans receivable, net	989,256		975,025		—		—		975,025
FHLB stock	10,410		10,410		—		10,410		—
Accrued interest receivable	4,084		4,084		—		4,084		—
Derivative fair value asset	2,366		2,366		—		2,366		—

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	421,824		421,824		421,824		—		—
Certificates of deposit, retail	335,440		331,850		—		331,850		—
Certificates of deposit, brokered	75,488		74,986		—		74,986		—
Advances from the FHLB	224,000		219,208		—		219,208		—
Accrued interest payable	570		570		—		570		—


	December 31, 2016										December 31, 2017
			Estimated		Fair Value Measurements Using:								Estimated		Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
	(In thousands)										(In thousands)
Financial Assets:
Cash on hand and in banks	$	5,779	$	5,779	$	5,779	$	—	$	—	$	9,189	$	9,189	$	9,189	$	—	$	—
Interest-earning deposits with banks	25,573		25,573		25,573		—		—		6,942		6,942		6,942		—		—
Investments available-for-sale	129,260		129,260		—		129,260		—		132,242		132,242		—		132,242		—
Loans receivable, net	815,043		818,054		—		—		818,054		988,662		980,578		—		—		980,578
FHLB stock	8,031		8,031		—		8,031		—		9,882		9,882		—		9,882		—
Accrued interest receivable	3,147		3,147		—		3,147		—		4,084		4,084		—		4,084		—
Derivative fair value asset	1,333		1,333		—		1,333		—		1,526		1,526		—		1,526		—

Financial Liabilities:
Deposits	285,335		285,335		285,335		—		—		430,750		430,750		430,750		—		—
Certificates of deposit, retail	356,653		356,723		—		356,723		—		333,264		331,199		—		331,199		—
Certificates of deposit, brokered	75,488		75,431		—		75,431		—		75,488		74,947		—		74,947		—
Advances from the FHLB	171,500		170,221		—		170,221		—		216,000		214,477		—		214,477		—
Accrued interest payable	231		231		—		231		—		326		326		—		326		—

Fair value estimates are measured at the exit price notion. The methods and calculation assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s financial instruments:

Financial instruments with book value equal to fair value: The fair value of financial instruments that are short-term or reprice frequently and that have little or no risk are considered to have a fair value equal to book value. These instruments include cash on hand and in banks, interest-earning deposits with banks, FHLB stock, accrued interest

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

receivable and accrued interest payable. FHLB stock is not publicly-traded, however it may be redeemed on a dollar-for-dollar basis, for any amount the Bank is not required to hold, subject to the FHLB’s discretion. The fair value is therefore equal to the book value.

Investments available-for-sale: The fair value of all investments, excluding FHLB stock, was based upon quoted market prices for similar investments in active markets, identical or similar investments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable.

Loans receivable: ~~For variable rate loans that reprice frequently and with no significant change in credit risk,~~Prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-01, loan fair ~~values are based on carrying values. The~~value estimates were primarily calculated using discounted cash flows. With the adoption of ASU 2016-01, the fair value of ~~fixed-rate~~ loans ~~is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis, utilizing interest rates that would be offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. As a result~~receivable at June 30, 2018 were calculated from inputs reflective of current market ~~conditions, cash flow estimates have been further discounted~~pricing for similar instruments, to include acurrent origination spreads, liquidity premiums, and credit ~~factor.~~adjustments. The fair value of nonperforming loans is estimated using the fair value of the underlying collateral.

Derivatives: The fair value of derivatives is based on dealer quotes, pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques for which the determination of fair value may require significant management judgment or estimation.

Liabilities: The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as statement savings, interest-bearing checking and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand. The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows using current interest rates for certificates of deposit with similar remaining maturities. The fair value of FHLB advances is estimated based on discounting the future cash flows using current interest rates for debt with similar remaining maturities.

Off balance sheet commitments: No fair value adjustment is necessary for commitments made to extend credit, which represents commitments for loan originations or for outstanding commitments to purchase loans. These commitments

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

are at variable rates, are for loans with terms of less than one year and have interest rates which approximate prevailing market rates, or are set at the time of loan closing.

Fair value estimates are based on existing balance sheet financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business. The fair value has not been estimated for assets and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments.

Note 8 - Derivatives

The Company uses a derivative financial instrument, which qualifies as a cash flow hedge, to manage the risk of changes in future cash flows due to interest rate fluctuations. The ~~hedge~~hedged instrument is a $50.0 million three-month FHLB advance that will be renewed every three months at the fixed interest rate at that time. The agreement has a five-year term and stipulates that the counterparty will pay the Company interest at three-month LIBOR and the Company will pay fixed interest of 1.34% on the $50.0 million notional amount. The Company pays or receives the net interest amount quarterly and includes this amount as part of interest expense on the Consolidated Income Statement.

Quarterly, the effectiveness evaluation is based upon the fluctuation of the interest the Company pays to the FHLB for the hedge instrument as compared to the three-month LIBOR interest received from the counterparty. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the fair value of the cash flow hedge of ~~$1.1~~$2.4 million was reported with other assets. The tax effected amount of ~~$709,000~~$140,000 was included in Other Comprehensive Income. There were no amounts recorded in the Consolidated Income ~~Statement~~Statements for the quarters ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 or ~~2016~~2017 related to ineffectiveness.

Fair value for this derivative instrument, which generally changes as a result of changes in the level of market interest rates, is estimated based on dealer quotes and secondary market sources.

The following table presents the fair value of this derivative instrument as of June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2017:

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value at June 30, 2017		Fair Value at December 31, 2016		Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value at June 30, 2018		Fair Value at December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)					(In thousands)
Interest rate swap on FHLB debt designated as cash flow hedge	Other Assets	$	1,090	$	1,333	Other Assets	$	2,366	$	1,526

Total derivatives		$	1,090	$	1,333		$	2,366	$	1,526

The following table presents the effect of this derivative instrument on the Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Comprehensive Income for the quarters ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2017:

Balance Sheet Location Amount Recognized in OCI at June 30, 2017 Amount Recognized in OCI at December 31, 2016
(In thousands)
Interest rate swap on FHLB debt
designated as cash flow hedge Other assets $ 707
$ 866



	Balance Sheet Location	Amount Recognized in OCI at June 30, 2018		Amount Recognized in OCI at December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)
Interest rate swap on FHLB debt designated as cash flow hedge	Other assets	$	140	$	125

Note 9 - Stock-Based Compensation

In June 2016, First Financial Northwest’s shareholders approved the First Financial Northwest, Inc. 2016 Equity Incentive Plan (“2016 Plan”). This plan provides for the granting of incentive stock options (“ISO”), non-qualified stock options (“NQSO”), restricted stock and restricted stock units until June 2026. The 2016 Plan established 1,400,000 shares available to grant with a maximum of 400,000 of these shares available to grant as restricted stock awards. Each share issued as a restricted stock award counts as two shares towards the total shares available to award.

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Under the 2016 Plan, the vesting date for each option award or restricted stock award is determined by an award committee and specified in the award agreement. In the case of restricted stock awards granted in lieu of cash payments of directors’ fees, the grant date is used as the vesting date unless the award agreement provides otherwise.

As a result of the approval of the 2016 Plan, the First Financial Northwest, Inc. 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (“2008 Plan”) was frozen and no additional awards will be made. ~~As of~~At June 30, ~~2016, there were 611,756 available stock options and 74,478 available~~2018, the remaining 5,000 shares of unvested restricted stock awards ~~that are no longer available to be awarded~~ under the 2008 ~~Plan. Restricted~~Plan are expected to vest in 2018. In addition, 84,000 stock ~~awards and stock~~ options ~~that were~~ granted under the 2008 Plan ~~will continue~~are expected to vest and be available for exercise, and an additional 231,000 stock options from the 2008 Plan were available for exercise at June 30, 2018, subject to the 2008 Plan provisions. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, there were ~~1,351,028~~1,290,670 total shares available for grant under the 2016 Plan, including ~~375,514~~345,335 shares available to be granted as restricted stock.

For the three months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, total compensation expense for the ~~Plan~~2008 and 2016 Plans was ~~$291,000~~$326,000 and ~~$290,000,~~$291,000, respectively, and the related income tax benefit was ~~$102,000~~$68,000 and ~~$101,500,~~$102,000, respectively.

For the six months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016,~~2017, total compensation expense for the ~~Plan~~2008 and 2016 Plans was ~~$401,000,~~$409,000 and ~~$383,000,~~$401,000, respectively, and the related income tax benefit was $86,000 and $141,000, ~~and $134,000,~~ respectively.

Included in the above compensation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, directors’ compensation of $180,000 was recognized as a result of the awarding and vesting of restricted shares in lieu of cash payments of directors’ fees, with a related income tax benefit of $63,000.

Stock Options

Under the 2008 Plan, stock option awards were granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of First Financial Northwest’s common stock at the grant date. These option awards have a vesting period of five years, with 20% vesting on the anniversary date of each grant date, and a contractual life of 10 years. Any unexercised stock options expires ten years after the grant date, or sooner in the event of the award recipient’s death, disability or termination of service with the Company and the Bank.

Under the 2016 Plan, the exercise price and vesting period for stock options are determined by the award committee and specified in the award agreement, however, the exercise price shall not be less than the fair market value of a share as of the grant date. Any unexercised stock option will expire 10 years after the award date or sooner in the event of the award recipient’s death, disability, retirement, or termination of service.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes model that uses the following assumptions. The dividend yield is based on the current quarterly dividend in effect at the time of the grant. Historical employment data is used to estimate the forfeiture rate. The historical volatility of the Company’s stock price over a specified period of time is used for the expected volatility assumption. First Financial Northwest bases the risk-free interest rate on the U.S. Treasury Constant Maturity Indices in effect on the date of the grant. First Financial Northwest elected to use the “Share-Based Payments” method permitted by the SEC to calculate the expected term. This method uses the vesting term of an option along with the contractual term, setting the expected life at the midpoint.

Under certain conditions, a cashless exercise of vested stock options may occur by the option holder surrendering the number of options valued at the current stock price at the time of exercise to cover the total cost to exercise. The surrendered options are canceled and are unavailable for reissue.

A summary of the Company’s stock option plan awards and activity for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, follows:

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
Shares Weighted-Average Exercise Price Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at April 1, 2017 506,280
$ 10.27

Granted —

Exercised (18,340 ) 9.78

Outstanding at June 30, 2017 487,940
10.29
5.14 2,851,319
Vested and expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture
rate over the vesting term 482,870
10.28
5.12 2,826,214
Exercisable at June 30, 2017 318,940
9.81
4.14 2,014,489

For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Shares Weighted-Average Exercise Price Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2017 603,820

$ 10.19

Granted —

Exercised (115,880 )
9.78

Outstanding at June 30, 2017 487,940

10.29

5.14
2,851,319
Vested and expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture
rate over the vesting term
482,870

10.28

5.12
2,826,214
Exercisable at June 30, 2017 318,940

9.81

4.14
2,014,489



	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at April 1, 2018	442,940		$	10.22		$	2,894,042
Exercised	(127,940	)	9.91			1,044,826
Outstanding at June 30, 2018	315,000		10.34		5.49	2,891,350
Vested and expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term	312,480		10.33		5.48	2,870,965
Exercisable at June 30, 2018	231,000		9.94		5.22	2,211,850


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Shares		Weighted-Average Exercise Price		Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Term in Years	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2018	452,940		$	10.21		$	2,402,096
Exercised	(137,940	)	9.90			1,112,026
Outstanding at June 30, 2018	315,000		10.34		5.49	2,891,350
Vested and expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term	312,480		10.33		5.48	2,870,965
Exercisable at June 30, 2018	231,000		9.94		5.22	2,211,850

As of June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, there was ~~$458,000~~$184,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options granted under the 2008 Plan. The cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of ~~2.41~~1.66 years. There were no stock options granted during the ~~three and~~ six months ended June 30, ~~2017 under either the 2008 Plan or 2016 Plan.~~2018.

Restricted Stock Awards

The 2008 Plan authorized the grant of restricted stock awards to directors, advisory directors, officers and employees. Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the awards based on the fair value of the stock at the grant date. The restricted stock awards’ fair value is equal to the stock price on the grant date. Shares awarded under this plan as restricted stock vest ratably over a five-year period beginning at the grant date with 20% vesting on the anniversary date of each grant date.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The 2016 Plan authorizes the grant of restricted stock awards subject to vesting periods or terms as defined by the award committee and specified in the award agreement. Restricted stock awards granted in lieu of cash payments for directors’ fees are subject to immediate vesting on the grant date unless the award agreement provides otherwise.

A summary of changes in nonvested restricted stock awards for the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, follows:

~~FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~


	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2017				For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value		Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at April 1, 2017	26,400		$	9.13
Nonvested at April 1, 2018					25,987		$	14.93
Granted	10,434				9,192		19.98
Vested	(10,434	)	17.25		(9,192	)	19.98
Nonvested at June 30, 2017	26,400		9.13
Nonvested at June 30, 2018					25,987		14.93
Expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term	25,608				25,207		14.93


	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2017				For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
	Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value		Shares		Weighted-Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2017	26,400		$	9.13
Nonvested at January 1, 2018					5,000		$	10.88
Granted	10,434				30,179		17.14
Vested	(10,434	)	17.25		(9,192	)	19.98
Nonvested at June 30, 2017	26,400		9.13
Nonvested at June 30, 2018					25,987		14.93
Expected to vest assuming a 3% forfeiture rate over the vesting term	25,608				25,207		14.93

As of June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, there was ~~$87,000~~$222,000 of total unrecognized compensation costs related to nonvested shares granted as restricted stock awards. The cost is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of ~~0.75 years.~~eight months.

Note 10 - Earnings Per Share

Per the provisions of FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, nonvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are participating securities and are included in the computation of EPS pursuant to the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula that determines earnings per share for each class of common stock and participating security according to dividends declared (or accumulated) and participation rights in undistributed earnings. ESOP shares are considered outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share when the shares are committed to be released. Certain of the Company’s nonvested restricted stock awards qualify as participating securities.

Net income is allocated between the common stock and participating securities pursuant to the two-class method, based on their rights to receive dividends, participate in earnings, or absorb losses. Basic earnings per common shares is computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding participating nonvested restricted shares.

The following table presents a reconciliation of the components used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share for the periods indicated:

3433

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017
	(Dollars in thousands, except share data)												(Dollars in thousands, except share data)
Net income	$	1,868		$	1,440		$	4,212		$	3,265		$	3,102		$	1,868		$	9,944		$	4,212
Less: Earnings allocated to participating securities	(4		)	(5		)	$	(10	)	$	(11	)	(7		)	(4		)	$	(23	)	$	(10	)
Earnings allocated to common shareholders	$	1,864		$	1,435		$	4,202		$	3,254		$	3,095		$	1,864		$	9,921		$	4,202

Basic weighted average common shares outstanding	10,363,345			12,390,234			10,341,654			12,567,464			10,271,432			10,363,345			10,241,297			10,341,654
Dilutive stock options	122,192			120,704			147,147			132,619			125,578			122,192			125,140			147,147
Dilutive restricted stock grants	15,292			19,782			14,222			18,072			8,939			15,292			6,037			14,222
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding	10,500,829			12,530,720			10,503,023			12,718,155			10,405,949			10,500,829			10,372,474			10,503,023

Basic earnings per share	$	0.18		$	0.12		$	0.41		$	0.26		$	0.30		$	0.18		$	0.97		$	0.41
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.18		$	0.11		$	0.40		$	0.26		$	0.30		$	0.18		$	0.96		$	0.40

Potential dilutive shares are excluded from the computation of earnings per share if their effect is anti-dilutive. For the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, there were ~~20,000~~no options to purchase shares of common stock that were omitted from the computation of diluted earnings per share because their effect would be anti-dilutive. For the three months ended June 30, 2017, options to purchase an additional 20,000 shares of common stock were excluded as their effect would be anti-dilutive. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, ~~there~~the were no anti-dilutive ~~shares~~options omitted from the ~~computation.~~ computation of diluted earnings per share.

Note 11 - Branch Acquisition

On August 25, 2017, First Financial Northwest Bank completed the acquisition of four branches from Opus Bank, a California state-chartered commercial bank (“Branch Acquisition”). The Branch Acquisition included four retail branches located in Woodinville, Clearview, Lake Stevens, and Smokey Point, Washington. The Bank acquired $74.7 million of retail deposits, prior to the fair value adjustment, one owned bank branch, three leased branches, and certain fixed assets at these branches. The purchase price of the Branch Acquisition paid by the Bank included a deposit premium of 3.125% of the average daily balance of acquired deposits for 20 days prior to the closing date, or $2.5 million; 80% of the fair market value of the owned branch, or $488,000; the net book value of fixed assets, or $56,000; and $14,000 for other pro rations and adjustments as of the closing date. Opus Bank paid the Bank $71.6 million in cash for the difference between these amounts and the total deposits assumed.

The Branch Acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, and accordingly, the assets received and liabilities assumed were recorded at their fair market value as of August 25, 2017. The application of the acquisition method of accounting resulted in recognition of a core deposit intangible asset (“CDI”) of $1.3 million and goodwill of $889,000. The acquired CDI has been determined to have a useful life of approximately ten years and is amortized on an accelerated basis. Goodwill is not amortized but will be evaluated for impairment on an annual basis, or more often if circumstances dictate, to determine if the carrying value remains appropriate.

The operating results of the Company include the operating results produced by the acquired liabilities and additional branch locations. For illustrative purposes, the following table provides certain unaudited pro forma information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, with the information calculated as if the four Opus branches had been acquired as of January 1, 2017, the beginning of the year prior to the date of acquisition. The pro forma information is an estimate of the additional interest expense, noninterest income and noninterest expense that might have been incurred during this period. The unaudited pro forma statement does not include interest income earned on the investment of the acquired funds into either loans receivable or available-for-sale investment securities. Actual results would have differed from the unaudited pro forma information presented.

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)



	Unaudited Pro Forma
	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017		Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
	(In thousands except share data)
Total revenues (net interest income plus noninterest income)	$	9,598	$	18,891
Net income	1,498		3,464
Earnings per share - basic	0.14		0.33
Earnings per share - diluted	0.14		0.33

The Company recognized acquisition related expenses of $1,000 and $6,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, respectively, and $319,000 for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017.

The following table includes noninterest expenses for the four acquired branches for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018. These expenses are included in the Consolidated Income Statements in Item 1 of this report:



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018		Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
	(In thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	256	$	542
Occupancy and equipment	136		218
Marketing	11		16
Other general and administrative	20		42
Total noninterest expense	$	423	$	818

Note 12 - Revenue Recognition

In accordance with Topic 606, revenues are recognized when goods or services are transferred to the customer in exchange for the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to receive. To determine the appropriate recognition of revenue for transactions within the scope of Topic 606, the Company performs the following five steps: (i) identify the contract(s) with the customer; (ii) identify the separate performance obligations in the contract; (iii) determine the transaction price; (iv) allocate the transaction price to the separate performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognize revenue when the entity satisfies a performance obligation. A contract may not exist if there are doubts as to collectability of the amounts the Company is entitled to in exchange for the goods or services transferred. If a contract is determined to be within the scope of Topic 606, the Company recognizes revenue as it satisfies a performance obligation. The largest portion of the Company’s revenue is from net interest income which is not within the scope of Topic 606.

Disaggregation of Revenue

The following table includes the Company’s noninterest income disaggregated by type of service for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017:

FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)



	Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2018			June 30, 2017		June 30, 2018			June 30, 2017
	(In thousands)
(Loss) gain on sale of investments ⁽¹⁾	$	(21	)	$	56	$	(21	)	$	56
BOLI change in cash surrender value ⁽¹⁾	224			116		473			317
Wealth management revenue	156			307		255			447
Deposit related fees	71			57		134			99
Debit card and ATM fees	104			37		202			66
Loan related fees	104			119		190			154
Loan interest swap fees	22			36		70			121
Other	3			3		6			6
Total noninterest income	$	663		$	731	$	1,309		$	1,266

_______________

⁽¹⁾ Not within scope of Topic 606

For the three and six months ended June 30, ~~2016, options~~2018, substantially all of the Company’s revenues under the scope of Topic 606 are for performance obligations satisfied at a specified date.

Revenues recognized within scope of Topic 606

Wealth management revenue: Our wealth management revenue consists of commissions received on the investment portfolio managed by Bank personnel but held by a third party. Commissions are earned on brokerage services and advisory services based on contract terms at the onset of a new customer’s investment agreement or quarterly for ongoing services. Commissions are paid by the third party to ~~purchase~~the Bank when the performance obligation has been completed by both entities.

Deposit related fees: Fees are earned on our deposit accounts for various products or services performed for our customers. Fees include business account fees, non-sufficient fund fees, stop payment fees, wire services, safe deposit box, and others. These fees are recognized on a daily or monthly basis, depending on the type of service.

Debit card and ATM fees: Fees are earned when a debit card issued by the Bank is used or when other bank’s customers use our ATM services. Revenue is recognized at the time the fees are collected from the customer’s account or remitted by the VISA interchange network.

Loan related fees: Noninterest fee income is earned on our loans for servicing or annual fees on certain loan types.

Loan interest swap fees: For loans participating in an ~~additional 60,000 shares~~interest rate swap agreement, fees are earned at the onset of ~~common stock, respectively, were excluded~~the agreement and are not contingent on any future performance or term length of the loan itself. The performance obligation is satisfied by entering into the contract and receipt of the fees from the counterparty.

Other: Fees earned on other services, such as ~~their effect would be anti-dilutive.~~merchant services or occasional non-recurring type services, are recognized at the time of the event or the applicable billing cycle.

Contract Balances

At June 30, 2018, the Company had no contract liabilities where the Company had an obligation to transfer goods or services for which the Company had already received consideration. In addition, the Company had no material performance obligations as of this date.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain matters discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to our financial condition, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical fact, are based on certain

assumptions and are generally identified by use of the words “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “forecasts,” “intends,” “plans,” “targets,” “potentially,” “probably,” “projects,” “outlook” or similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “would” and “could.” Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to our beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, assumptions and statements about, among other things, expectations of the business environment in which we operate, projections of future performance or financial items, perceived opportunities in the market, potential future credit experience, and statements regarding our mission and vision. These forward-looking statements are based upon current management expectations and may, therefore, involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results, performance, or achievements may differ materially from those suggested, expressed, or implied by forward-looking statements as a result of a wide variety or range of factors including, but not limited to: the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and write-offs, that may be affected by deterioration in the housing and commercial real estate markets, and may lead to increased losses and nonperforming assets in our loan portfolio, and may result in our allowance for loan losses not being adequate to cover actual losses, and require us to materially increase our reserves; changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas; changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short and long term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources; fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas; results of examinations of us by the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and our bank subsidiary by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), the Washington State Department of Financial Institutions, Division of Banks (“DFI”) or other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such regulatory authority may initiate an enforcement action against the Company or the Bank which could require us to increase our reserve for loan losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital position, affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits, or impose additional requirements or restrictions on us, any of which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; our ability to pay dividends on our common stock; our ability to attract and retain deposits; increases in premiums for deposit insurance; our ability to control operating costs and expenses; the use of estimates in determining the fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in

significant declines in valuation; difficulties in reducing risk associated with the loans on our balance sheet; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our work force and potential associated charges; ~~computer~~disruptions, security breaches, or other adverse events, failures or interruptions in, or attacks on, our information technology systems or on ~~which we depend could fail or experience a security breach;~~the third-party vendors who perform several of our critical processing functions; our ability to retain key members of our senior management team; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; our ability to implement our branch expansion strategy; our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel we have acquired or may in the future acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames and any goodwill charges related ~~thereto, including our pending branch purchase;~~thereto; our ability to manage loan delinquency rates; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; increased competitive pressures among financial services companies; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business including changes in regulatory policies and principles, including the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules, including as a result of Basel III; the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the ~~“Dodd Frank~~“Dodd-Frank Act”) and the implementing regulations; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions; adverse changes in the securities markets; inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board, including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; the economic impact of war or any terrorist activities; other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations; pricing, products and services; and other risks detailed in our filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017 (“~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K”). Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this Form 10-Q and in the other public reports and statements we make may turn out to be wrong because of the inaccurate assumptions we might make, because of the factors illustrated above or because of other factors that we cannot foresee. Because of these and other uncertainties, our actual future results may be materially different from those expressed in any forward-looking statements made by or on our behalf. Therefore, these factors should be considered in evaluating the forward-looking statements, and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no responsibility to update or revise any forward-looking statements.

Overview

First Financial Northwest Bank (“the Bank”) is a wholly-owned subsidiary of First Financial Northwest, Inc. (“the Company”) and, as such, comprises substantially all of the activity for the Company. First Financial Northwest Bank was a community-based savings bank until February 4, 2016, when the Bank converted to a Washington chartered commercial bank reflecting the commercial banking services it now provides to its customers. The Bank primarily serves King, Pierce, Snohomish, and Kitsap counties, Washington, through its full-service banking office and ~~smaller branch~~headquarters in Renton, Washington, as well as four retail branches in King County, Washington and ~~additional~~five retail branches ~~located~~ in ~~Mill Creek, Edmonds, and the community of Crossroads in Bellevue,~~Snohomish County, Washington. ~~The addition of branch locations, together with improved technology from the conversion to a new core data processor in 2015 have allowed~~On August 25, 2017, the Bank completed the purchase of four retail branches in Woodinville in King County, and Lake Stevens, Clearview, and Smokey

Point communities in Snohomish County and acquired $74.7 million in deposits. The Branch Acquisition expanded our retail footprint and provided an opportunity to ~~better meet~~extend our unique brand of community banking into those communities. In addition, in April 2018, the ~~needs of our customers and broaden the demographics of our customer base. The~~ Bank ~~has received regulatory approval to open~~opened a new branch office at The Junction, a new, mixed use development in Bothell, Washington in the fourth quarter of 2017. In addition, the Bank has received FDIC, DFI and California Department of Business Oversight approvals for the acquisition of four Washington branches located in the Clearview area in Snohomish, the Smokey Point area in Arlington, Lake Stevens, and Woodinville, Washington. ~~The acquisition is scheduled to close during the third quarter of 2017, subject to customary closing conditions.~~

The Bank’s business consists predominantly of attracting deposits from the general public, combined with borrowing from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (“FHLB”) and raising funds in the wholesale market, then utilizing these funds to originate one-to-four family residential, multifamily, commercial real estate, construction/land, business, and consumer loans. Our current business strategy emphasizes commercial real estate, construction, one-to-four family residential, and multifamily lending. With the current low interest rate environment, we are not aggressively pursuing longer term assets, but rather are focused on financing shorter term loans, in particular construction/land loans. Recently, improvements in the economy, employment rates, stronger real estate prices, and a general lack of new housing inventory in certain areas in the Puget Sound region have resulted in our significantly increasing originations of construction loans for properties located in our market area. We anticipate that construction/land lending will continue to be a strong element of our total loan portfolio in future periods. We will continue to take a disciplined approach in our construction/land lending by concentrating our efforts on ~~one-to-four family~~ residential loans to builders known to ~~us. On a limited basis, we also will provide~~us, including multifamily loans to developers with proven success in this type of construction. These short term loans typically mature in six to eighteen months. In addition, wethe funding is usually not fully disbursed at origination, thereby reducing our net loans receivable in the short term. We have also geographically expanded our loan portfolio through loan purchases or loan participations of commercial and multifamily real estate loans that are outside of our primary market area. ~~We have a loan officer with extensive experience in California to further support~~Through our efforts to geographically diversify our loan portfolio ~~through~~with direct loan originations, loan participations, or loan ~~purchases.~~purchases, our portfolio includes loans in 23 other states, including concentrations in California, Oregon and Arizona of $45.6 million, $12.0 million and $14.7 million, respectively.

In support of our strategic growth plan, the Bank has developed a national line of business to originate and service aircraft loans. These loans are collateralized by new or used, single-engine piston aircraft to light jets for business or personal use which have demonstrated an acceptable valuation history under industry accepted valuation resources. ~~As we grow our aircraft loan portfolio, we anticipate these~~These loans will generally range in size from $250,000 to $8.0 million with underwriting guidelines primarily based on the asset value of the collateral with secondary emphasis placed on the ability of the borrower to repay the loan. However, the underwriting importance of the asset value compared to the borrowers’ financial condition may fluctuate, based on the relative strengths or weaknesses of each of these underwriting components. We began originating aircraft loans in the fourth quarter of 2016. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, our business loans included ~~$6.2~~$10.0 million in fixed and adjustable rate aircraft loans.

Our primary source of revenue is interest income, which is the income that we earn on our loans and investments. Interest expense is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Net interest income is the difference between interest income and interest expense. Changes in levels of interest rates affect interest income and interest expense differently and, thus, impacts our net interest income.

An offset to net interest income is the provision for loan losses which is required to establish the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) at a level that adequately provides for probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio. As our loan portfolio increases, or due to an increase for probable losses inherent in our loan portfolio, our ALLL may increase, resulting in a decrease to net interest income. Improvements in loan risk ratings, increases in property values, or receipt of recoveries of amounts previously charged off may partially or fully offset any increase to ALLL due to loan growth or an increase in probable loan losses.

Noninterest income is generated from various loan or deposit fees, increases in the cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance (“BOLI”), and revenue earned on our wealth management brokerage services. This income is increased or partially offset by any net gain or loss on sales of investment securities.

Our noninterest expenses consist primarily of salaries and employee benefits, professional fees, regulatory assessments, occupancy and equipment, and other general and administrative expenses. Salaries and employee benefits consist primarily of the salaries and wages paid to our employees, payroll taxes, expenses for retirement, and other employee benefits. OREO-related expenses consist primarily of maintenance and costs of utilities for the OREO inventory, market valuation adjustments, build-out expenses, gains and losses from OREO sales, legal fees, real estate taxes, and insurance related to the properties included in the OREO inventory. Professional fees include legal services, auditing and accounting services, computer support services, and other professional services in support of strategic plans. Occupancy and equipment expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of buildings and equipment, consist primarily of real estate taxes, depreciation expenses, maintenance, and costs of utilities. Also included in noninterest expense are changes to the Company’s unfunded commitment reserve which are reflected in general and administrative expenses. This unfunded commitment reserve expense can vary significantly each quarter, based on the amount believed by management to be sufficient to absorb estimated probable losses related to unfunded credit facilities, and reflects changes in the amounts that the Company has committed to fund but has not yet disbursed.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our significant accounting policies are fundamental to understanding our results of operations and financial condition because they require that we use estimates and assumptions that may affect the value of our assets or liabilities and our financial results. These policies are critical because they require management to make difficult, subjective, and complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because it is likely that materially different amounts would be reported under different

conditions or by using different assumptions. These policies govern the ALLL, the valuation of OREO, and the calculation of deferred taxes, fair values, and other-than-temporary impairments on the market value of investments and derivatives. These policies and estimates are described in further detail in Part II, Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies ~~with~~in the ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K. There have not been any material changes in the Company’s critical accounting policies and estimates as compared to the disclosure contained in the ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K.

Comparison of Financial Condition at June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016~~2017

Total assets were ~~$1.1~~$1.22 billion at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, an increase of ~~4.3%~~1.1%, from ~~$1.0~~$1.21 billion at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The following table details the ~~$44.1~~$13.8 million net change in the composition of our assets at June 30, ~~2017~~2018 from December 31, ~~2016.~~

2017.


	Balance at June 30, 2017		Change from December 31, 2016			Percent Change		Balance at June 30, 2018		Change from December 31, 2017			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)							(Dollars in thousands)
Cash on hand and in banks	$	7,418	$	1,639		28.4	%	$	9,017	$	(172	)	(1.9	)%
Interest-earning deposits with banks	10,996		(14,577		)	(57.0	)	14,056		7,114			102.5
Investments available-for-sale, at fair value	133,951		4,691			3.6		138,055		5,813			4.4
Loans receivable, net	861,672		46,629			5.7		989,256		594			0.1
Premises and equipment, net	19,501		1,040			5.6
FHLB stock, at cost	8,902		871			10.8		10,410		528			5.3
Accrued interest receivable	3,165		18			0.6		4,084		—			—
Deferred tax assets, net	2,620		(522		)	(16.6	)	1,296		85			7.0
OREO	1,825		(506		)	(21.7	)	483		—			—
Premises and equipment, net								21,436		822			4.0
BOLI, net	28,721		4,568			18.9		29,501		474			1.6
Prepaid expenses and other assets	2,937		273			10.2		4,391		(1,347		)	(23.5	)
Goodwill								889		—			—
Core deposit intangible								1,191		(75		)	(5.9	)
Total assets	$	1,081,708	$	44,124		4.3	%	$	1,224,065	$	13,836		1.1	%

Interest-earning deposits with banks. Our interest-earning deposits with banks, consisting primarily of funds held at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$14.6~~$7.1 million from December 31, ~~2016~~2017, to June 30, ~~2017. Loan payoffs received late~~2018. These funds fluctuate based on our funding needs. When excess cash is available in ~~the fourth quarter of 2016 were temporarily held~~these accounts, it is invested in ~~our Federal Reserve Bank account, then partially~~higher interest-earning assets or used to ~~fund new loan originations in the six months ended June 30, 2017.~~pay down FHLB advances.

Investments available-for-sale. Our investments available-for-sale portfolio increased by ~~$4.7~~$5.8 million during the first six months of ~~2017.~~2018. During this period, we purchased ~~$14.2 million of securities which included four mortgage-backed securities, two subordinated debt securities, and one tax-exempt municipal bond. We also sold $4.7~~$22.1 million of securities which included two mortgage-backed securities, two corporate bond, two tax-exempt municipal securities, three asset-backed securities, and a portion of a subordinated debt security. The mortgage-backed securities were sold in favor of a collateralized mortgage obligation security which met our investment objectives while the portion of the subordinated debt security was sold in order to allow us the ability to diversify our holdings of bank subordinated debt notes through reinvestment of the proceeds received in other issuers. In addition, the Bank had partial calls of $5,000 on a taxable municipal security and $21,000 on afour U.S. government agency ~~security.~~bonds. These purchases were made to complete the restructuring of our available-for-sale investment securities that began in December 2017, as well as to invest excess cash earning a nominal yield into higher-yielding assets. The purchases included certain longer-term securities as well as Community Reinvestment Act (“CRA”) qualified investments. During the six months ended June 30, 2018, we sold $1.6 million of securities, had a called security of $1.5 million, and maturities or early payoffs of $6.7 million. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, corporate bonds issued by financial institutions represented ~~$24.5~~$23.1 million, or ~~18.3%~~16.8% of our investments available-for-sale and municipal bonds represented ~~$14.1~~$13.8 million, or ~~10.7%~~10.0% of our investments available-for-sale.

The net unrealized loss of our investments available-for-sale had a pre-tax decrease of $829,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2017 as a result of a net improvement in the market value of the underlying securities in our portfolio.

The effective duration of the investments available-for-sale at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, was ~~3.5%~~3.3% as compared to ~~4.0%~~2.9% at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017, partially due to the longer-term securities purchased during the quarter. Effective duration is a measure that attempts to quantify the anticipated percentage change in the value of an investment security (or portfolio) in the event of a 100 basis point change in market yields. Since the Bank’s portfolio includes securities with embedded options (including call options on bonds and prepayment options on mortgage-backed securities), management believes that effective duration is an appropriate metric to use as a tool when analyzing the Bank’s investment securities portfolio, as effective duration incorporates assumptions relating to such embedded options, including changes in cash flow assumptions as interest rates change.

Loans receivable. Net loans receivable remained relatively unchanged, increasing $594,000 to $989.3 million at June 30, 2018 as compared to December 31, 2017. Loan originations of $147.1 million were supplemented with $18.9 million of purchases to offset loan repayments. During the first six months of 2018, our one‑to‑four family portfolio increased ~~$46.6~~by $24.9 million, with specific emphasis on loans for investment properties and to foreign nationals. Both of these sectors have challenges obtaining secondary market eligible loans, making them a desirable niche for our portfolio. In addition, multifamily and commercial real estate loans increased by $10.0 million and $10.4 million, respectively. The total balance of our construction loans decreased by $58.3 million during the first six months of ~~2017~~2018, primarily due to ~~$861.7~~a $20.0 million atpaydown in January 2018 of a construction/land loan and a slowdown of originations on construction projects.

The growth in one-to-four family residential loans and decrease in construction/land loans have improved our commercial concentrations. At June 30, ~~2017. While~~2018 and December 31, 2017, the ~~concentrations of our commercial and~~Bank’s construction loans ~~have increased, we routinely monitor these levels in support~~totaled 73.5% and 108.6%, respectively, of ~~our strategic plan to maintain compliance with internally established concentration guidelines.~~total capital, and total non-owner occupied commercial real estate was 475.2% and 514.0%, respectively, of total capital. The Bank has set aggregate concentration guidelines that total commercial real estate, including residential, ~~non-residential,~~non‑residential, and construction, should not exceed 550% of total risk-based capital. Our ~~guidelines~~concentration guideline for construction/land loans ~~are~~is to limit these loans to 100% of total risk-based capital. ~~At June 30, 2017, the Bank’s concentrations were 443.0% for total commercial real estate loans and 115.3% for total construction/land loans.~~ The concentration of construction/land loans is calculated using the funded balance of these loans and consequently can fluctuate based on the timing of construction draws and loan payoffs. Management reviews estimated construction draws and loan payoffs and adjusts loan originations based on these estimates to achieve compliance with our construction guidelines. Our commercial and multifamily real estate and construction/land loan portfolios are subject to ongoing credit reviews performed by both independent loan review staff, as well as an external third-party review firm to assist with

identifying potential adverse trends and risks in the portfolio allowing management to initiate timely corrective action, as necessary. Such reviews also assist with ensuring loan risk grades are accurately assigned and thereby properly accounted for in the ALLL. The review places emphasis on large borrowing relationships, stress testing, compliance with loan covenants, as well as other risk factors warranting enhanced review.

The following table presents a breakdown of our commercial and construction loan portfolio by collateral type at June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016:~~2017:


	June 30, 2017		December 31, 2016		June 30, 2018		December 31, 2017
	(In thousands)				(In thousands)
Multifamily real estate:
Micro-unit apartments	$	5,580	$	7,878	$	14,204	$	14,331
Other multifamily	120,304		115,372		180,649		170,571
Total multifamily	125,884		123,250
Total multifamily real estate					194,853		184,902

Commercial real estate:
Office	95,256		101,688		99,739		112,327
Retail	99,482		106,294		141,451		129,875
Mobile home park	21,851		20,689		15,655		19,970
Warehouse	21,491		15,338		28,185		22,701
Storage	35,121		34,816		30,383		32,201
Other non-residential	44,017		24,869		56,820		44,768
Total commercial real estate	317,218		303,694		372,233		361,842

Construction/land:
One-to-four family residential	76,404		67,842		85,218		87,404
Multifamily	123,497		111,051		75,433		108,439
Commercial	1,100		—		5,735		5,325
Land	39,012		30,055		12,911		36,405
Total construction/land	240,013		208,948		179,297		237,573
Total commercial, multifamily and construction/land loans	$	683,115	$	635,892
Total multifamily, commercial and construction/land loans					$	746,383	$	784,317

~~During~~

The LIP related to our construction/land loans decreased by $10.9 million as draws and payoffs of existing construction loans outpaced originations during the first six months of 2017, total construction/land loans increased by $31.1 million as compared to December 31, 2016. The LIP related to these loans increased by $16.4 million as the unfunded portion of new loan originations exceeded disbursements on existing loans.2018. Included in total construction/land loans ~~net of LIP,~~ at June 30, ~~2017~~2018 are ~~$48.9~~$55.2 million of multifamily loans ~~$25,000~~and $5.7 million of commercial ~~loans and $1.1 million of one-to-four family~~ loans that will roll over to permanent loans at the completion of their construction period in accordance with the terms of the construction/land loan. At December 31, 2017, construction/land loans included $71.4 million of multifamily loans, $5.3 million of commercial loans and $2.6 million of one-to-four family loans that roll over to permanent loans in accordance with the terms of the construction/land loan.

To assist in our strategic initiatives for loan growth and to achieve geographic diversification, the Bank will originate and purchase loans and utilize loan participations ~~or loan purchases~~with the underlying collateral located within areas of Washington State outside our primary market area or in ~~the Western United States.~~other states. The Bank’s goal with respect to loan participations is to locate a selling bank that is unable to make an entire loan due to legal or lending concentration limitations. Sellers of these loans are reviewed for management/lending experience, financial condition, asset quality metrics, and regulatory matters. Loans acquired through participation or purchase must meet the Bank’s underwriting standards. During the six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Bank purchased ~~participation interests in seven~~$18.9 million of loans that included $928,000 of one-to-four family residential loans secured by properties located in Washington State and ~~California for a total~~$17.9 million of ~~$23.3 million.~~commercial loans secured by properties located in New York, Utah, Pennsylvania and California.

The majority of our loan portfolio continues to be ~~focused~~secured by properties located in our primary market area, however ~~we are also seeking geographic diversification. Through loan purchases and by loan originations initiated by our California employee, we have acquired loans~~a significant amount is secured by ~~collateral located~~properties in ~~Arizona,~~other areas of Washington, in California, ~~Colorado, Oregon,~~ and ~~Utah.~~in other states. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, total loans secured by collateral located in California represented ~~2.1%~~4.5% of our total loans, net of LIP and total loans secured by collateral located outside the states of California and Washington represented ~~4.8%~~8.0% of our total loans, net of LIP. The following table details geographic concentrations in our loan portfolio, net of LIP:


	At June 30, 2017														At June 30, 2018
	One-to-four family residential		Multifamily		Commercial real estate		Construction/land		Business		Consumer		Total		One-to-Four Family Residential		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/Land		Business		Consumer		Total
	(In thousands)														(In thousands)
King County	$	192,685	$	78,548	$	162,228	$	131,287	$	8,908	$	7,980	$	581,636	$	231,274	$	120,633	$	183,153	$	84,354	$	12,434	$	10,790	$	642,638
Pierce County	37,908		15,044		27,198		3,766		—		511		84,427		33,643		10,472		27,881		10,487		—		626		83,109
Snohomish County	12,177		2,189		30,215		15,151		63		214		60,009		22,052		3,249		33,750		439		13		367		59,870
Kitsap County	1,632		1,536		823		135		—		78		4,204		3,375		1,505		797		2,168		—		—		7,845
California	—		—		17,911		—		439		—		18,350		2,756		17,755		24,715		—		354		—		45,580
Other Washington Counties	11,648		17,078		53,082		1,743		1,361		248		85,160		9,749		24,198		47,370		776		1,317		546		83,956
Outside Washington and California	582		11,489		25,218		—		4,435		—		41,724
Outside Washington and California ⁽¹⁾															723		17,041		54,024		—		8,003		—		79,791
Total loans, net of LIP	$	256,632	$	125,884	$	316,675	$	152,082	$	15,206	$	9,031	$	875,510	$	303,572	$	194,853	$	371,690	$	98,224	$	22,121	$	12,329	$	1,002,789

_______________

⁽¹⁾Includes loans in Oregon, Arizona, Utah and 19 other states.

Our five largest borrowing relationships, which represent ~~9.9%~~7.9% of our net loans, ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$7.5~~$9.6 million to ~~$87.0~~$78.9 million at June 30, ~~2017~~2018, from ~~$79.5~~$88.5 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The total number of loans represented by this group of borrowers ~~increased to 30~~remained stable at 18 loans at both June 30, ~~2017 from 23 loans at~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, all five borrowers were current on their loan payments. We monitor the performance of these borrowing relationships very closely due to their concentration risk in relation to the entire loan portfolio.

The following table details our five largest lending relationships at June 30, ~~2017:~~2018:


Borrower ⁽¹⁾	Number of Loans	One-to-Four Family Residential ⁽²⁾		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/ Land		Consumer		Aggregate Balance of Loans ⁽³⁾		Number of Loans	One-to-Four Family Residential ⁽²⁾		Multifamily		Commercial Real Estate		Construction/Land		Business		Consumer		Aggregate Balance of Loans ⁽³⁾
	(Dollars in thousands)													(Dollars in thousands)
Real estate investor	2	$	562	$	—	$	—	$	22,000	$	—	$	22,562	5	$	—	$	8,698	$	13,368	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	22,066
Real estate investor	17	—		17,417		832		—		—		18,249		3	—		—		—		4,173		10,924		—		15,097
Real estate investor	4	469		—		15,552		—		—		16,021		5	450		—		13,903		—		—		319		14,672
Real estate investor	5	461		—		14,443		—		500		15,404		2	—		13,855		—		—		—		—		13,855
Real estate investor	2	—		—		—		14,755		—		14,755		3	442		—		12,734		—		—		—		13,176
Total	30	$	1,492	$	17,417	$	30,827	$	36,755	$	500	$	86,991	18	$	892	$	22,553	$	40,005	$	4,173	$	10,924	$	319	$	78,866

________


⁽¹⁾	The composition of borrowers represented in the table may change between periods.


⁽²⁾	~~$930,000~~All of the one-to-four family residential loans for these borrowers are for owner occupied ~~properties while $562,000 is for non-owner occupied.~~properties. The commercial real estate loans are for non-owner occupied properties.


⁽³⁾	Net of LIP.

The ALLL ~~increased~~decreased to ~~$11.3~~$12.8 million at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, from ~~$11.0~~$12.9 million at December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, and represented ~~1.3%~~1.27% and 1.28% of total loans receivable, net of LIP at ~~both~~ June 30, ~~2017~~2018, and December 31, ~~2016.~~2017, respectively. The ALLL consists of two components, the general allowance and the specific reserves. The ~~increase~~decrease in the ALLL was primarily athe result of ~~growth~~recoveries in our loan portfolio and consisted of a ~~$439,000 increase~~$77,000 decrease in the general reserve ~~which included $34,000 of recoveries,~~ and a ~~$105,000~~$51,000 decrease in the specific reserves. For additional information, see “Comparison of Operating Results for the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 - Provision for Loan Losses” discussed below.

We believe that the ALLL at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, was adequate to absorb the probable and inherent risks of loss in the loan portfolio at that date. While we believe the estimates and assumptions used in our determination of the adequacy of the allowance are reasonable, there can be no assurance that such estimates and assumptions will be proven correct in the future, that the actual amount of future losses will not exceed the amount of past provisions, or that any increased provisions that may be required will not adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. Future additions to the allowance may become necessary based upon changing economic conditions, the level of problem loans, business conditions, credit concentrations, increased loan balances, or changes in the underlying collateral of the loan portfolio. In addition, the determination of the amount

of our ALLL is subject to review by bank regulators as part of the routine examination process, which may result in the establishment of additional loss reserves or the charge-off of specific loans against established loss reserves based upon their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

As we work with our borrowers that face difficult financial circumstances, we explore various options available to minimize our risk of loss. At times, the best option for our customers and the Bank is to modify the loan for a period of time, usually one year or less. Certain loan modifications are accounted for as troubled debt restructured loans (“TDRs”). These modifications have included a reduction in interest rate on the loan for a period of time, advancing the maturity date of the loan, or allowing interest-only payments for a specific time frame. These modifications are granted only when there is a reasonable and attainable restructured loan plan that has been agreed to by the borrower and is considered to be in the Bank’s best interest.

The following table presents a breakdown of our TDRs at the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			Six Month Change			June 30, 2018			December 31, 2017			Six Month Change
	(Dollars in thousands)									(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming TDRs:
One-to-four family residential	$	106		$	174		$	(68	)
Total nonperforming TDRs	106			174			(68		)	—			—			—

Performing TDRs:
One-to-four family residential	19,152			24,274			(5,122		)	9,990			13,434			(3,444		)
Multifamily	1,146			1,564			(418		)	1,122			1,134			(12		)
Commercial real estate	3,660			4,202			(542		)	2,624			3,194			(570		)
Consumer	43			43			—			43			43			—
Total performing TDRs	24,001			30,083			(6,082		)	13,779			17,805			(4,026		)
Total TDRs	$	24,107		$	30,257		$	(6,150	)	$	13,779		$	17,805		$	(4,026	)
% TDRs classified as performing	99.6		%	99.4		%				100.0		%	100.0		%

Our TDRs decreased ~~$6.2~~$4.0 million at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, as a result of principal repayments and loan payoffs. At June 30, ~~2017, one TDR of $106,000 was~~2018, there were no TDRs on nonaccrual ~~status because it had previously not performed in accordance with the terms of its restructure although now current on its payments. There~~status. In addition, there were no committed but undisbursed funds in connection with our TDRs and impaired loans. The largest TDR relationship at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, totaled ~~$8.2~~$3.2 million and was ~~comprised of $7.5~~secured by $2.9 million in one-to-four family residential rental properties and ~~$747,000~~$376,000 in an owner occupied commercial property, all located in King County.

Loans are considered past due if a scheduled principal or interest payment is due and unpaid for 30 days or more. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, total past due loans represented ~~0.01%~~0.05% of total loans receivable, as compared to ~~0.06%~~0.01% at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017.

Nonperforming assets ~~decreased to $2.4 million~~remained relatively unchanged with a balance of $647,000 at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$3.2 million~~$662,000 at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. The following table presents detailed information on our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated:


	June 30, 2017			December 31, 2016			Six Month Change			June 30, 2018			December 31, 2017			Six Month Change
	(Dollars in thousands)									(Dollars in thousands)
Nonperforming loans:
One-to-four family residential	$	528		$	798		$	(270	)	$	116		$	128		$	(12	)
Consumer	55			60			(5		)	48			51			(3		)
Total nonperforming loans	583			858			(275		)	164			179			(15		)

OREO	1,825			2,331			(506		)	483			483			—
Total nonperforming assets ⁽¹⁾	$	2,408		$	3,189		$	(781	)	$	647		$	662		$	(15	)

Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets	0.22		%	0.31		%				0.05		%	0.05		%

^____________

⁽¹⁾ The difference between nonperforming assets reported above, and the totals reported by other industry sources, is due to their inclusion of all TDRs as nonperforming loans, although ~~99.6%~~100.0% of our TDRs were performing in accordance with their restructured terms at June 30, ~~2017. The remaining 0.4% of TDRs at June 30, 2017, that were nonperforming are reported above as nonperforming loans.~~2018.

Nonaccrual loans are loans that are 90 days or more delinquent or other loans which, in management's opinion, the borrower is unable to meet scheduled payment obligations. ~~Nonaccrual~~Principal repayments on nonaccrual loans decreased the balance to ~~$583,000~~$164,000 at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, from ~~$858,000~~$179,000 at December 31, 2016. During the first six months of 2017, one loan with a $62,000 balance was returned to accrual status as a result of consistent payments for a period of time and demonstration of the ability to continue making payments. Further reductions in nonperforming loans were the result of $213,000 in principal payments and payoffs of nonaccrual loans during this period.2017. There were no loan charge-offs or loans added to nonaccrual ~~status.~~status during the first six months of 2018.

The ~~three largest~~two nonaccrual loans in the loan portfolio at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, included a ~~$283,000 owner occupied single~~$116,000 one-to-four family ~~residence in Snohomish County, a $131,000~~residential loan secured by an owner occupied single family residence in Snohomish County and a ~~$106,000 owner~~$48,000 home equity second mortgage secured by a nonowner occupied single family residence in King County. ~~Each~~At June 30, 2018, both of these loans iswere current on ~~its~~their loan payments.

We continue to focus our efforts on working with borrowers to bring their loans current or converting nonaccrual loans to OREO and subsequently selling the properties. By taking ownership of these properties, we can generally convert nonearning assets into earning assets on a more timely basis than which may otherwise be the case. Our success in this area is reflected by the ~~continued improved~~low ratio of our nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets ~~which declined to 0.22%~~of 0.05% at both June 30, 2018, and December 31, 2017 and our minimal amount of OREO held at June 30, ~~2017, compared to 0.31% at December 31, 2016.~~2018.

OREO. OREO includes properties acquired by the Bank through foreclosure or acceptance of a deed in lieu of foreclosure. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, OREO was ~~$1.8 million~~$483,000 and ~~$2.3 million, respectively. During the six months ended June 30, 2017, a $50,000 market valuation adjustment was taken on a property for which we had entered into a sale contract. The sale~~consisted of ~~this property closed in April 2017.~~

~~The three largest OREO properties at June 30, 2017, were an office building valued at $837,000~~two undeveloped lots located in Pierce County ~~a retail building valued at $505,000 in Mason County,~~with carrying values of $270,000 and ~~undeveloped land valued at $270,000 in Pierce County.~~$213,000.

The following table presents a breakdown of our OREO by county and number of properties at June 30, ~~2017:~~2018:

County Total OREO Number of Properties Percent of
Total OREO
Pierce Mason
(Dollars in thousands)
OREO:
Commercial real estate ⁽¹⁾
$ 1,320
$ 505
$ 1,825
4
100.0 %
Total OREO $ 1,320
$ 505
$ 1,825
4
100.0 %



	County								Total OREO		Number of Properties	Percent of Total OREO
	King		Pierce		Kitsap		Mason		Total OREO		Number of Properties	Percent of Total OREO
	(Dollars in thousands)
OREO:
Commercial real estate ⁽¹⁾	—		$	483	$	—	$	—	$	483	2	100.0	%
Total OREO	$	—	$	483	$	—	$	—	$	483	2	100.0	%

⁽¹⁾~~Of the four properties classified as~~The two commercial real estate ~~two are office/retail buildings and two~~properties are undeveloped lots.

Intangible assets. The balance of goodwill was $889,000 at both June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. Goodwill was calculated as the excess purchase price of the branches acquired in the Branch Acquisition over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at August 25, 2017.

The core deposit intangible (“CDI”) recorded as part of the Branch Acquisition represents the fair value of the customer relationships on the acquired noninterest-bearing checking, interest-bearing checking, savings, and money market accounts. The CDI balance was $1.2 million and $1.3 million at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The initial ratio of CDI to the acquired balances of core deposits was 2.23%. This amount amortizes into noninterest expense on an accelerated basis over ten years.

Deposits. During the first six months of ~~2017,~~2018, deposits ~~increased $18.1~~decreased $6.8 million to ~~$735.6~~$832.8 million at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$717.5~~$839.5 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. Deposit accounts consisted of the following:


	June 30, 2017		Change from December 31, 2016			Percent Change		June 30, 2018		Change from December 31, 2017			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)							(Dollars in thousands)
Noninterest-bearing	$	35,126	$	1,704		5.1	%	$	51,454	$	6,020		13.2	%
Interest-bearing checking	21,059		2,527			13.6		39,231		1,007			2.6
Statement savings	26,668		(1,715		)	(6.0	)	26,597		(1,859		)	(6.5	)
Money market	232,206		27,208			13.3		304,542		(14,094		)	(4.4	)
Certificates of deposit, retail	345,028		(11,625		)	(3.3	)	335,440		2,176			0.7
Certificates of deposit, brokered	75,488		—			—		75,488		—			—
	$	735,575	$	18,099		2.5		$	832,752	$	(6,750	)	(0.8	)

The balances at our four acquired branches have remained stable with a net increase of $1.3 million at June 30, 2018 compared to August 25, 2017, the acquisition date. In addition, our branch in the Crossroads community of Bellevue, Washington had an increase in deposits of $16.6 million during the first six months of ~~2017 was predominantly in retail deposits reflecting our strategy to grow our core deposits. Growth occurred in both our noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing checking accounts and~~2018. The balance of money market accounts ~~as we pursue these sources~~decreased

during the six months ended June 30, 2018, due to the managed run off of ~~lower~~higher cost ~~funding.~~deposits. Our growth to ten branch locations supports our goal to grow and diversify our deposit base.

Our portfolio of brokered certificates of deposits remained at $75.5 million at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, unchanged from December 31, ~~2016. We may add to~~2017. As needed, we will increase our portfolio of these brokered deposits as a source of additional funding in future periods. While brokered certificates of deposit may carry a higher cost than our retail certificates, their remaining maturity periods of 131 to 4333 months, along with the enhanced call features of these deposits, assist us in our efforts to manage interest rate risk.

At June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, we held ~~$23.8~~$22.2 million and ~~$23.7~~$21.5 million in public funds, respectively, nearly all of which were retail certificates of deposit.

Advances. We use advances from the FHLB as an alternative funding source to ~~reduce~~manage interest rate risk and to leverage our balance sheet. Total FHLB advances were ~~$191.5~~$224.0 million at June 30, ~~2017 and $171.5~~2018, an $8.0 million increase from $216.0 million at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Bank ~~held $56.5~~had $104.0 million in borrowings that are due in less than one year and ~~$135.0~~$120.0 million in borrowings that are due in ~~one to~~ three years. ~~Included in our total~~Our long-term advances at June 30, 2018 included three $40.0 million Member Option Variable Rate advances that ~~date is~~reprice quarterly and allow prepayment without penalties at the repricing date. In addition, we held $39.0 million in borrowed Fed Funds at that date. The repayment option on our Member Option Variable Rate advances and short term nature of Fed Funds provides us flexibility to adjust the level of our borrowings as our customer deposit balances grow consistent with our asset/liability objectives. Our FHLB advances also include a $50.0 million ~~three-month fixed-rate~~fixed rate three‑month advance that renews quarterly at the fixed interest rate in effect at that time designated as ~~a hedge instrument in~~ a cash flow hedge, as described below. Included in the category of advances that are due in one to three years is a $120.0 million Member Option Variable Rate advance that reprices quarterly and allows prepayment without penalties on the repricing date.

Cash Flow Hedge. To assist in managing interest rate risk, the Bank entered into a five-year, $50 million notional, pay fixed, receive floating cash flow hedge or interest rate swap with a qualified institution on October 25, 2016. Under the terms of the Cash Flow Hedge agreement, the Bank ~~will pay~~pays a fixed rate of 1.34% for five years and, ~~will~~ in turn, ~~receive~~receives an interest payment based on the three-month LIBOR index, which resets quarterly. Concurrently, the Bank borrowed a $50.0 million fixed rate three-month advance that will be renewed quarterly at the fixed interest rate in effect at that time. Effectiveness of the swap is evaluated quarterly with any ineffectiveness recognized as a gain or a loss on the income statement in noninterest income. A change in the fair value of the cash flow hedge is recognized as an other asset or other liability on the balance sheet with the tax-effected portion of the change included in other comprehensive income. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we recognized a ~~$1.1~~$2.4 million fair value asset as a result inof the increase in the market value of the hedge agreement.

Stockholders’ Equity. Total stockholders’ equity increased ~~$5.4~~$9.9 million during ~~2017~~the first six months of 2018 to ~~$143.5~~$152.6 million at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, from ~~$138.1~~$142.6 million at December 31, ~~2016. Additional paid-in capital increased $1.6~~2017. The primary source of the increase was an $8.4 million increase in retained earnings as athe result of ~~the exercise of stock options~~$9.9 million in net income for ~~115,880 shares during~~ the six months ended June 30, ~~2017. Also contributing to the increase, retained earnings increased $2.9 million during the six months ended June 30, 2017, as a result of $4.2 million in net income~~2018, partially offset by ~~$1.3~~shareholder cash dividends of $1.5 million, or $0.15 per share, paid ~~out in shareholder dividends.~~during this period. Additional shares of common stock were issued during the first six months of 2018 with the exercise of 137,940 stock options and awarding of 30,179 shares of restricted stock.

The following table shows cash dividends paid per share and the related dividend payout ratio for the periods indicated:


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017			2016			2018			2017			2018			2017

Dividend declared per common share	$	0.07		$	0.06		$	0.13		$	0.12		$	0.08		$	0.07		$	0.15		$	0.13
Dividend payout ratio ⁽¹⁾	38.9		%	51.8		%	32.0		%	46.4		%	26.7		%	38.9		%	15.5		%	32.0		%

______________

⁽¹⁾Dividends paid per common share divided by basic earnings per common ~~share~~share.

The Company has a share repurchase plan in effect from May 30, 2017 through November 30, 2017 authorizing the repurchase of 1,100,000 shares, or 10.0% of outstanding shares. At June 30, 2017, the Company had repurchased 22,700 shares at an average price of $15.93 per share.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Three Months Ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017

General. Net income for the three months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018, was ~~$1.9~~$3.1 million, or ~~$0.18~~$0.30 per diluted share as compared to net income of ~~$1.4~~$1.9 million, or ~~$0.11~~$0.18 per diluted share for the ~~quarter~~three months ended June 30, ~~2016.~~2017. The ~~$428,000~~$1.2 million increase in net income during the ~~first~~second quarter of ~~2017~~2018 was primarily athe result of ana $1.1 million increase in net interest income and the

recognition of a ~~decrease in the~~$400,000 recapture of provision for loan ~~losses~~loss for the three months ended June 30, 2018, partially offset by ana $651,000 increase in noninterest expense.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the ~~quarter~~three months ended June 30, 2018, increased $1.1 million to $10.1 million, as compared to $9.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, ~~increased $814,000 to $9.0 million, as compared to $8.2 million for the first quarter in 2016,~~ due primarily to the ~~$1.4 million increase~~growth in ~~our interest income~~the average balance of net loans outstanding between periods, partially offset by ~~a $633,000 increase in~~increased interest expense. Interest income primarily increased as a result of the growth in average loans receivable. Our net interest margin was 3.60% for the quarter ended June 30, 2017, compared to 3.63% for the quarter ended June 30, 2016. The change between quarters was primarily attributed to increased costs associated with interest-bearing liabilitiesexpense due to ~~the recent~~higher deposit balances and increases in short term interest rates. Our average interest earning assets increased by $157.4 million and the average yield increased 16 basis points for the three months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017.

The average balance of our interest-bearing liabilities increased by $138.4 million during the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017 as our customer deposits and borrowings increased to meet the funding needs of our loan portfolio. In response to increases in the short-term market interest rates, the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities has increased by 30 basis points between these same time periods.

The Company’s net interest margin and interest rate spread decreased by 10 basis points and 14 basis points, respectively, primarily due to increases in our cost of funds as our interest‑bearing liabilities generally reprice faster than our interest-earning assets in response to changes in market interest rates. For more information on this, see “How We Measure the Risk of Interest Rate Changes” in Item 3 of this report.

The following table details the change in net interest income due to changes in yield or cost, or changes in the average balance of the related asset or liability:

Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
Compared to June 30, 2016
Net Change

Rate
Volume
Total

(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:

   Loans receivable, net $ (176 )
$ 1,480

$ 1,304
   Investments available-for-sale 138

(8 )
130
   Interest-earning deposits with banks 22

(27 )
(5 )
   FHLB stock —

18

18
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets (16 )
1,463

1,447

Interest-bearing liabilities:

   Interest-bearing demand 13

1

14
   Statement savings (1 )
(1 )
(2 )
   Money market 125

21

146
   Certificates of deposit, retail 58

76

134
   Certificates of deposit, brokered 2
41
43
   Advances from the FHLB 163

135

298
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities 360

273

633
Total net change in net interest income $ (376 )
$ 1,190

$ 814



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 Compared to June 30, 2017 Change in Interest
	Rate			Volume			Total
	(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net	$	212		$	1,865		$	2,077
Investments available-for-sale	65			58			123
Interest-earning deposits with banks	14			(12		)	2
FHLB stock	33			10			43
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets	324			1,921			2,245

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand	(18		)	17			(1		)
Statement savings	(1		)	—			(1		)
Money market	298			169			467
Certificates of deposit, retail	217			(38		)	179
Certificates of deposit, brokered	15			—			15
Advances from the FHLB	363			91			454
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities	874			239			1,113
Total net change in net interest income	$	(550	)	$	1,682		$	1,132

The ~~$1.3~~$2.1 million increase in loan interest income during the second quarter of ~~2017,~~2018, as compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, was a combined result of a ~~$118.7~~$152.2 million increase in the average outstanding loan balance ~~partially offset by a decrease~~with an increase in the average loan yield of nine basis points. ~~Higher yielding~~Loan originations during the past year were generally made at higher market rates as compared to the existing loan portfolio. Also contributing to the increase in loan yield, the portion of our loan portfolio of variable rate loans ~~continue~~increased to ~~be repaid while rates of new loan originations remain relatively unchanged in spite of the recent rate increases in the Federal Funds rate by the Federal Reserve Board.~~50.8% at June 30, 2018 from 45.3% at June 30, 2017.

~~During the first quarter of 2017, interest income from our investments available-for-sale~~Interest expense increased by ~~$130,000~~$1.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in ~~2016. The average balance of our investments available-for-sale for the three months ended June 30,~~ 2017, ~~decreased by $1.4 million~~primarily as ~~compared to the same period last year as sales and paydowns outpaced purchases of new investments. As~~ a result of ~~restructuring~~increases in the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, in particular money market interest deposits, and FHLB advances. In response to market rate increases, the average cost of our available-for-sale investment portfolio through the sales of lower yielding investment securities, and utilizing the proceeds received to purchase higher yielding, long-term investment securities last year, our yield on these assetsinterest-bearing deposits increased by 4219 basis points and the average cost of our FHLB advances increased by 68 basis points for the three months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018 as compared

to the same period in ~~2016.~~

~~Partially offsetting~~2017. Also contributing to the increase in interest ~~income, interest~~ expense ~~increased by $633,000 for~~during these periods, the ~~three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016. The~~ average balance of our interest-bearing ~~liabilities~~deposits increased ~~$116.4~~by $108.9 million, ~~over~~with a significant portion of this coming from our branch acquisition in the ~~last year to support~~third quarter of 2017. Money market interest expense increased by $467,000 as a result of a $104.3 million increase in the average balance combined with a 37 basis point increase in the average cost of these funds. To further assist in funding the growth in our financial assets. The average balance of deposits increased by $55.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016, including growth in retail certificates of deposit of $26.0 million, money market accounts of $19.5 million, brokered certificates of deposit of $9.9 million, and interest-bearing checking accounts of $2.8 million. These increases were partially offset by a decrease of $3.1 million inloans receivable, the average balance of our ~~statement savings accounts. The average cost of our deposits~~FHLB advances increased by ~~12 basis points for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to~~$29.5 million between the same period in 2016. In further support of our asset growth, average borrowings at the FHLB increased by $61.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, and the average cost of these funds increased 35 basis points as compared to the same period in 2016. The average cost of both our deposits and FHLB borrowings increased for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016 in response to increases in the Federal Funds rate.periods.

The following table compares detailed average balances, related interest income or interest expense, associated yields and rates, and the resulting net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017. Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of net loans receivable and are considered to carry a zero yield.


	Three Months Ended June 30,												Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017						2016						2018						2017
	Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield / Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Loans receivable, net	$	844,853	$	10,352	4.91	%	$	726,109	$	9,048	5.00	%	$	997,059	$	12,429	5.00	%	$	844,853	$	10,352	4.91	%
Investments available-for-sale	132,375		887		2.69		133,813		757		2.27		141,035		1,010		2.87		132,375		887		2.69
Interest-earning deposits with banks	16,831		42		1.00		39,167		47		0.48		11,927		44		1.48		16,831		42		1.00
FHLB stock	8,616		62		2.89		6,097		44		2.89		10,004		105		4.21		8,616		62		2.89
Total interest-earning assets	1,002,675		11,343		4.54		905,186		9,896		4.39		1,160,025		13,588		4.70		1,002,675		11,343		4.54
Noninterest earning assets	63,802						58,002						69,316						63,802
Total average assets	$	1,066,477					$	963,188					$	1,229,341					$	1,066,477

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest-bearing checking	$	20,426	$	19	0.37	%	$	17,592	$	5	0.11	%
Interest-bearing demand													$	38,662	$	18	0.19	%	$	20,426	$	19	0.37	%
Statement savings	27,366		10		0.15		30,449		12		0.16		26,262		9		0.14		27,366		10		0.15
Money market	220,241		358		0.65		200,738		212		0.42		324,507		825		1.02		220,241		358		0.65
Certificates of deposit, retail	349,401		1,075		1.23		323,390		941		1.17		336,933		1,254		1.49		349,401		1,075		1.23
Certificates of deposit, brokered	75,488		314		1.67		65,612		271		1.66		75,488		329		1.75		75,488		314		1.67
Total interest-bearing deposits	692,922		1,776		1.03		637,781		1,441		0.91		801,852		2,435		1.22		692,922		1,776		1.03
Advances from the FHLB	184,357		570		1.24		123,148		272		0.89
Advances from the FHLB and other borrowings													213,857		1,024		1.92		184,357		570		1.24
Total interest-bearing liabilities	877,279		2,346		1.07		760,929		1,713		0.90		1,015,709		3,459		1.37		877,279		2,346		1.07
Noninterest bearing liabilities	45,555						33,082						63,389						45,555
Average equity	143,643						169,177						150,243						143,643
Total average liabilities and equity	$	1,066,477					$	963,188					$	1,229,341					$	1,066,477
Net interest income			$	8,997					$	8,183					$	10,129					$	8,997
Net interest margin					3.60	%					3.63	%					3.50	%					3.60	%

Provision for Loan Losses. Management recognizes that loan losses may occur over the life of a loan and that the ALLL must be maintained at a level necessary to absorb specific losses on impaired loans and probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Our methodology for analyzing the ALLL consists of two components: general and specific reserves. The general reserve is determined by applying factors to our various groups of loans. Management considers factors such as charge-off history, the prevailing economy, the regulatory environment, competition, geographic and loan type concentrations, policy and underwriting standards, nature and volume of the loan portfolio, managements’ experience level, our loan review and grading systems, the value of underlying collateral and the level of problem loans in assessing the ALLL. The specific reserve component is created when management believes that the collectability of a specific loan has been impaired and a loss is ~~probable.~~probable or a concession is granted that reduces the value of the loan. The specific reserves are computed using current appraisals, listed sales prices, and other available information, less costs to complete, if any, and costs to sell the property. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires

estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available or if future events differ from current estimates.

During the quarter ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, management evaluated the adequacy of the ALLL and concluded that ~~additional~~a recapture of provision for loan losses in the amount of ~~$100,000~~$400,000 was appropriate for the ~~quarter. For~~quarter, primarily due to the decline in loans receivable and changes in the composition of our loan portfolio. During the quarter ended June 30, ~~2016,~~2018, net construction/land loans decreased by $19.3 million and business loans decreased $2.1 million, consequently decreasing the related general allowance required on these higher risk loans. In comparison, during the quarter ended June 30, 2017, a ~~$600,000~~$100,000 provision for loan losses was ~~recorded. For the second quarter of 2017, the provision for loan losses was primarily~~recognized as a result of growth in ~~our loan receivables~~loans receivable, partially offset by payoffs and credit improvements to certain adversely ~~classified~~graded loans. ~~In comparison, the provision reported in the second quarter of 2016 was primarily a result of an increase in the balance of our loans receivable.~~

The following table summarizes selected financial data related to our ALLL and loan portfolio. All loan balances and ratios are calculated using loan balances that are net of LIP.


	At or For the Three Months Ended June 30,						At or For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Total loans receivable, net of LIP, end of period	$	875,510		$	778,120		$	1,002,789		$	875,510
Average loans receivable during period	844,853			726,109			997,059			844,853
ALLL balance at beginning of period	11,158			9,471			13,136			11,158
Provision for loan losses	100			600
(Recapture) provision for loan losses							(400		)	100
Charge-offs:
Consumer	—			—
Total charge-offs	—			—			—			—
Recoveries:
One-to-four family	27			63			6			27
Construction/land development							12			—
Total recoveries	27			63			18			27
Net recovery	27			63			18			27
ALLL balance at end of period	$	11,285		$	10,134		$	12,754		$	11,285
ALLL as a percent of total loans, net of LIP	1.29		%	1.30		%	1.27		%	1.29		%
Ratio of net recoveries to average net loans receivable	0.01			0.03			—			—

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income ~~increased $23,000~~decreased $68,000 to $663,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2018, from $731,000 for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2017, from $708,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2016.~~2017. The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of noninterest income:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017	Change from Three Months Ended June 30, 2016		Percent Change		Three Months Ended June 30, 2018			Change from Three Months Ended June 30, 2017			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)					(Dollars in thousands)
Service fees on deposit accounts	38	9		31.0	%
Loan service fees	120	39		48.1
Net gain on sale of investments	56	56		100.0
Net loss on sale of investments						(21		)	(77		)	(137.5	)
BOLI change in cash surrender value	116	(109	)	(48.4	)	224			108			93.1	%
Wealth management revenue	307	26		9.3		156			(151		)	(49.2	)
Deposit related fees						175			81			86.2
Loan related fees						126			(29		)	(18.7	)
Other	94	2		2.2		3			—			—
Total noninterest income	731	23		3.2		$	663		$	(68	)	(9.3	)%

The ~~increase~~decrease in noninterest income for the ~~quarter~~three months ended June 30, 2018, compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017, ~~compared to the quarter ended June 30, 2016,~~ was ~~partially~~primarily the result of ~~the $56,000 gain on sales~~a $151,000 decrease in wealth management revenue. This is a combined result of a ~~portion~~reduction in sales staff and fluctuations in the timing and mix of ~~a corporate bond and two mortgage-backed securities during the second quarter of 2017. During the same period in 2016, we did not sell any of our investment securities. Further contributing to the~~commissions received on these serviced accounts. This decrease

was partially offset by an increase in ~~2017, loan service~~deposit related fees ~~increased by $39,000~~ as a result of our increased ~~prepayment penalties~~number of branches and ~~wealth management revenue increased by $26,000~~the corresponding increase in ATM and debit card related fees as ~~we continue to expand our portfolio of managed accounts. These increases were partially offset by a decrease~~well as other fees from an increase in ~~noninterest~~transaction volume.

Noninterest income from our BOLI ~~policies. During~~policies increased by $108,000 for the ~~second quarter of~~three months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017, ~~we purchased~~as the increase in cash surrender value on the $4.2 million in ~~additional~~ policies ~~where certain policy~~purchased in 2017 was partially offset by plan expenses ~~are deducted from earnings over~~during the first year ~~thereby reducing~~subsequent to the ~~overall noninterest income recognized from BOLI policies for the initial one year period.~~purchase date.

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased ~~$764,000~~$651,000 to $7.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, from $6.8 million for the ~~quarter ended June 30, 2017 from $6.1 million for the~~ comparable ~~quarter~~period in ~~2016.~~2017.

The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of noninterest expense:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2017			Change from Three Months Ended June 30, 2016			Percent Change		Three Months Ended June 30, 2018		Change from Three Months Ended June 30, 2017			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	4,409		$	568		14.8	%	$	4,931	$	522		11.8	%
Occupancy and equipment	579			91			18.6		829		250			43.2
Professional fees	482			(79		)	(14.1	)	442		(40		)	(8.3	)
Data processing	519			268			106.8		351		(168		)	(32.4	)
Gain on sale of OREO property, net	(5		)	(94		)	(105.6	)
OREO related expenses, net	(15		)	(1		)	7.1		2		22			110.0
Regulatory assessments	112			(5		)	(4.3	)	110		(2		)	(1.8	)
Insurance and bond premiums	98			12			14.0		154		56			57.1
Marketing	52			12			30.0		77		25			48.1
Other general and administrative	605			(8		)	(1.3	)	591		(14		)	(2.3	)
Total noninterest expense	$	6,836		$	764		12.6	%	$	7,487	$	651		9.5	%

Expenses for salaries and employee benefits increased ~~$568,000~~$522,000 for the ~~second quarter of 2017,~~three months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in ~~2016 primarily as a result of increases in costs due to the increase in the number of employees.~~2017. As a result of our ~~new~~de novo branches, the Branch Acquisition and the development of new products, the number of full time employees increased to 149 at June 30, 2018, from 129 at June 30, ~~2017 from 118 at June 30, 2016.~~2017. In addition to the ~~change~~impact on employee expenses, the increase in ~~timing~~the number of ~~recognition of~~our branch locations over the ~~compensation expense for directors’ restricted stock awards~~last year resulted in ~~$180,000 of additional~~a $250,000 increase in occupancy and equipment expenses. Partially offsetting these increases, our data processing expense decreased by $168,000 for the ~~quarter~~three months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018, as ~~compared to~~we incurred additional expenses during the same period in ~~2016.~~

~~As a result~~2017 in support of our ~~pending acquisition of four retail branches, our data processing expense increased by $268,000 for~~ATM conversion and the ~~quarter ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due primarily to the cost of data conversion of the accounts in these branches.~~

Partially offsetting these increases, professional fees decreased by $79,000, primarily as a result of a reduction in legal costs. During the second quarter of 2016, we incurred additional legal expenses relating to our modified Dutch auction tender offer completed in 2016. In addition, noninterest expense declined as we incurred a $5,000 gain on the sale of OREO property in the quarter ended June 30, 2017 as compared to a loss on sale of $89,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2016.Branch Acquisition.

Federal Income Tax Expense. ~~Our statutory~~Income before federal income taxes increased by $913,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to the same period in 2017, however, the provision for income taxes was lower as a result of utilizing a lower effective federal corporate income tax rate isfor the three months ended June 30, 2018, due to the Tax Act. As of January 1, 2018, our statutory federal corporate income tax rate was 21%, as compared to 35%. for prior years. We recorded federal income tax provisions of ~~$924,000~~$603,000 and ~~$779,000~~$924,000 for the ~~quarters~~three months ended June 30, 2018, and 2017, ~~and 2016, respectively, as~~respectively. In addition, the exercise of stock options resulted in a ~~result of~~reduction in our ~~consolidated pretax net income. Our~~ effective tax rate for both periods, however a larger number of stock options were exercised during the ~~quarter~~three months ended June 30, ~~2017 was 30.3%, which reflected the year-to-date impact of stock options exercised~~2018, resulting in ~~the first quarter of 2017. In comparison, the effective~~a greater reduction in our tax rate ~~for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 was 32.1%, which reflected reversal of nontaxable BOLI income and a 10% penalty on the early surrender a BOLI policy.~~during this period.

Comparison of Operating Results for the Six Months Ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017

General. Net income for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 was ~~$4.2~~$9.9 million, or ~~$0.40~~$0.96 per diluted share as compared to net income of ~~$3.3~~$4.2 million, or ~~$0.26~~$0.40 per diluted share for the six months ended June 30, ~~2016. Net~~2017. The increase in 2018 was primarily the result of a $3.3 million increase in net interest income ~~increased by $1.9~~and a $4.4 million ~~year over year, however this was~~recapture of loan loss provision partially offset by a ~~$1.1~~$1.6 million increase in noninterest expense.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017 increased $1.9 million to $17.9~~2018 was $21.1 million, as compared to ~~$16.0~~$17.9 million for the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, due to the ~~$2.9~~$5.4 million increase in our interest income partially offset by a ~~$988,000~~$2.1 million increase in interest expense. The increase in total interest income was primarily the result of the ~~growth~~$156.4 million increase in average loans ~~receivable. Our~~receivable combined with an increase in the average loan yield of 26 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017. A significant contributor to this increase was the receipt of an additional $1.0 million in

loan interest income during the first quarter of 2018 from repayment of balances on previously charged off loans. The additional interest also contributed to our net interest margin, ~~was~~which increased to 3.69% for the six months ended June 30, 2018, from 3.62% for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017, compared to 3.54% for~~2017.

The average balance of our interest-bearing liabilities increased by $145.8 million during the six months ended June 30, ~~2016. The change between periods was primarily attributed~~2018, as compared to the ~~increase~~same period in ~~average~~2017 as our customer deposits and borrowings increased to meet the funding needs of our loan ~~balances and the increase~~portfolio. In response to increases in the ~~average yield on~~short-term market interest rates, the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities has increased by 27 basis points between these same time periods.

The Company’s net interest margin and interest rate spread increased by seven basis points and four basis points, respectively, primarily due to increases in our cost of interest-bearing liabilities as our interest bearing liabilities generally reprice faster than our interest-earning assets ~~outpacing increased average costs associated with interest-bearing liabilities.~~in response to changes in market interest rates. For more information on this, see “How We Measure the Risk of Interest Rate Changes” in Item 3 of this report.

The following table details the change in net interest income due to changes in yield or cost, or changes in the average balance of the related asset or liability:



	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 Compared to June 30, 2017 Change in Interest
	Rate			Volume			Total
	(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net	$	1,278		$	3,815		$	5,093
Investments available-for-sale	62			145			207
Interest-earning deposits with banks	32			(36		)	(4		)
FHLB stock	39			25			64
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets	1,411			3,949			5,360

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Interest-bearing demand	(27		)	33			6
Statement savings	(2		)	(1		)	(3		)
Money market	613			335			948
Certificates of deposit, retail	368			(106		)	262
Certificates of deposit, brokered	31			—			31
Advances from the FHLB	672			190			862
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities	1,655			451			2,106
Total net change in net interest income	$	(244	)	$	3,498		$	3,254

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
Compared to June 30, 2016 Net Change
Rate Volume Total
(In thousands)
Interest-earning assets:
   Loans receivable, net $ (628 ) $ 3,232
$ 2,604
   Investments available-for-sale 315
(15 ) 300
   Interest-earning deposits with banks 35
(109 ) (74 )
   FHLB stock 19
34
53
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets (259 ) 3,142
2,883

Interest-bearing liabilities:
   Interest-bearing demand 25
1
26
   Statement savings (1 ) (1 ) (2 )
   Money market 197
19
216
   Certificates of deposit, retail 135
165
300
   Certificates of deposit, brokered (91 ) 94
3
   Advances from the FHLB 190
255
445
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities 455
533
988
Total net change in net interest income $ (714 ) $ 2,609
$ 1,895

~~Average loans receivable increased $128.5~~The $5.1 million ~~for~~increase in loan interest income during the first six months ~~ended June 30, 2017~~of 2018, as compared to the same period in ~~2016 while~~2017, was a combined result of a $156.4 million increase in the average outstanding loan balance with an increase in the average loan yield ~~decreased~~of 26 basis points. While a portion of the yield increase was due to ~~4.92% from 5.07% for~~ the ~~six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively as loans originated~~receipt of $1.0 million in additional interest income discussed above, loan originations during the past year ~~were~~ at ~~lower~~generally higher market interest rates, and the variable rate nature of our loan portfolio also helped to increase the average ~~rates than those paying off.~~yield on our loan portfolio.

Interest income on our investments available-for-sale increased ~~$300,000~~$207,000 for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018, as compared to the same period in ~~2016~~2017 primarily as a result of the ~~48 basis point~~$10.9 million increase in the ~~yield on these assets. We have continued to restructure~~average balance of our ~~portfolio of these securities to include additional longer term higher-yielding investment securities to increase earnings from our investment~~investments portfolio.

Interest income on our interest-earning deposits decreased ~~$74,000~~$4,000 for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018, as compared to the same period in ~~2016,~~2017, primarily as a result of the ~~$43.3~~$8.7 million decrease in the average balance of these ~~deposits as we shifted~~deposits. We convert excess cash earning a nominal yield into higher yielding ~~assets.~~assets or paydowns on our FHLB advances. Partially offsetting the impact of the decrease in average balance of our interest-earning deposits, the average yield earned on interest-earning deposits ~~from the Federal Reserve Bank~~ increased by ~~34 basis points year over year.~~

Partially offsetting the increase in interest income, our interest expense increased $988,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. The average cost of our deposits increased by nine55 basis points for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, as compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017.

Interest expense increased $2.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits increased by 17 basis points for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2017 as we remained competitive with rising market interest rates. Interest expense on money market accounts increased by ~~$216,000,~~$948,000, year over year ~~primarily~~ due to an 18increase in the average balance of these accounts of $112.2 million combined with a 38 basis point increase in the cost of these funds. In addition, interest expense on retail certificates of deposit increased by ~~$300,000, primarily from~~$262,000 as a ~~combined~~ result of a ~~$28.9 million increase in the average balance of these accounts and an eight~~22 basis point increase in the cost of these ~~funds.~~funds partially offset by a $17.3 million decrease in their average balance. Interest expense on our FHLB advances and other borrowings increased by ~~$445,000~~$862,000 for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, as compared to the same period in ~~2016~~2017 as a result of a ~~$55.0~~$33.3 million increase in the average balance of FHLB advances and a 2264 basis point increase in the cost of these funds.

The following table compares detailed average balances, associated yields and rates, and the resulting changes in interest and dividend income or expense for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016.~~2017. Nonaccrual loans are included in the average balance of net loans receivable and are considered to carry a zero yield.


	Six Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017						2016						2018						2017
	Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield or Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield or Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield or Cost		Average Balance		Interest Earned / Paid		Yield or Cost
	(Dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Loans receivable, net	$	835,106	$	20,379	4.92	%	$	706,606	$	17,775	5.07	%	$	991,460	$	25,472	5.18	%	$	835,106	$	20,379	4.92	%
Investments available-for-sale	130,693		1,732		2.67		132,073		1,432		2.19		141,632		1,939		2.76		130,693		1,732		2.67
Interest-earning deposits with banks	20,512		86		0.85		63,774		160		0.51		11,823		82		1.40		20,512		86		0.85
FHLB stock	8,327		144		3.49		6,066		91		3.03		9,800		208		4.28		8,327		144		3.49
Total interest-earning assets	994,638		22,341		4.53		908,519		19,458		4.32		1,154,715		27,701		4.84		994,638		22,341		4.53
Noninterest earning assets	61,848						58,291						69,195						61,848
Total average assets	$	1,056,486					$	966,810					$	1,223,910					$	1,056,486

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Interest-bearing checking	$	19,956	$	35	0.35	%	$	17,290	$	9	0.10	%
Interest-bearing demand													$	38,507	$	41	0.21	%	$	19,956	$	35	0.35	%
Statement savings	27,717		21		0.15		28,733		23		0.16		26,799		18		0.14		27,717		21		0.15
Money market	215,071		641		0.60		205,968		425		0.42		327,309		1,589		0.98		215,071		641		0.6
Certificates of deposit, retail	352,391		2,147		1.23		323,524		1,847		1.15		335,042		2,409		1.45		352,391		2,147		1.23
Certificates of deposit, brokered	75,488		623		1.66		65,516		620		1.91		75,488		654		1.75		75,488		623		1.66
Total interest-bearing deposits	690,623		3,467		1.01		641,031		2,924		0.92		803,145		4,711		1.18		690,623		3,467		1.01
Advances from the FHLB	177,964		1,015		1.15		123,017		570		0.93
Advances from the FHLB and other borrowings													211,215		1,877		1.79		177,964		1,015		1.15
Total interest-bearing liabilities	868,587		4,482		1.04		764,048		3,494		0.92		1,014,360		6,588		1.31		868,587		4,482		1.04
Noninterest bearing liabilities	45,796						32,948						62,020						45,796
Average equity	142,103						169,814						147,530						142,103
Total average liabilities and equity	$	1,056,486					$	966,810					$	1,223,910					$	1,056,486
Net interest income			$	17,859					$	15,964					$	21,113					$	17,859
Net interest margin					3.62	%					3.54	%					3.69	%					3.62	%

Provision for Loan Losses. During the six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, management evaluated the adequacy of the ALLL and concluded that ~~additional~~a recapture of provision for loan losses in the amount of ~~$300,000~~$4.4 million was appropriate for the period. The recapture for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was primarily a result of $4.3 million of recoveries received on previously charged off loans. In addition, the composition of our loan portfolio changed, resulting in lower balances of construction/land loans and business loans, which generally carry higher levels of risk. In comparison, the $300,000 provision for loan losses recorded

for the six months ended June 30, 2017, was primarily a reflection of the $46.6 million growth in net loans receivable during this period, partially offset by payoffs and credit improvements to certain adversely classified loans. ~~For the six months ended June 30, 2016, an additional provision of $500,000 was recorded as a result of loan growth.~~

The following table summarizes selected financial data related to our ALLL and loan portfolio. All loan balances and ratios are calculated using loan balances that are net of LIP.


	At or For the Six Months Ended June 30,						At or For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2018			2017
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Total loans receivable, net of LIP, end of period	$	875,510		$	778,120		$	1,002,789		$	875,510
Average loans receivable during period	835,106			706,606			991,460			835,106
ALLL balance at beginning of period	10,951			9,463			12,882			10,951
Provision for loan losses	300			500
(Recapture of provision) provision for loan losses							(4,400		)	300
Charge-offs:
Consumer	—			(19		)
Total charge-offs	—			(19		)	—			—
Recoveries:
One-to-four family	33			85			4,246			33
Commercial real estate	—			104			14			—
Construction/land development							12			—
Consumer	1			1			—			1
Total recoveries	34			190			4,272			34
Net recovery	34			171			4,272			34
ALLL balance at end of period	$	11,285		$	10,134		$	12,754		$	11,285
ALLL as a percent of total loans, net of LIP	1.29		%	1.30		%	1.27		%	1.29		%
Ratio of net recoveries to average net loans receivable (annualized)	0.01			0.05			0.43			—

Noninterest Income. Noninterest income ~~increased $78,000 to~~remained relatively unchanged at $1.3 million for both the six months ended June 30, ~~2017, from $1.2 million for the same period in 2016.~~2018 and 2017. The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of noninterest income:


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017		Change from Six Months Ended June 30, 2016			Percent Change		Six Months Ended June 30, 2018			Change from Six Months Ended June 30, 2017			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)							(Dollars in thousands)
Service fees on deposit accounts	$	63	$	19		43.2	%
Loan service fees	155		26			20.2
Net gain on sale of investments	56		56			n/a
Net loss on sale of investments								(21		)	(77		)	(137.5	)%
BOLI change in cash surrender value	317		(73		)	(18.7	)	473			156			49.2
Wealth management revenue	447		(44		)	(9.0	)	255			(192		)	(43.0	)
Deposit related fees								336			171			103.6
Loan related fees								260			(15		)	(5.5	)
Other	228		94			70.1		6			—			—
Total noninterest income	$	1,266	$	78		6.6		$	1,309		$	43		3.4	%

~~The largest change to our~~BOLI noninterest income increased by $156,000 for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018, as compared to the same period in ~~2016 was the $95,000 increase~~2017. During 2017, $4.2 million in ~~other noninterest income. This increase was a result of an additional $77,000 of fees received during the 2017 six month period on loans~~new BOLI policies were purchased where certain ~~commercial loan customers participate in an interest rate swap with a third party broker institution and~~policy expenses were deducted from earnings over the ~~Bank receives a fee that is recognized as other~~first year subsequent to the purchase date, partially reducing the noninterest income aton our BOLI policies we otherwise would recognize. Deposit related fees increased by $171,000, primarily due to the ~~time the loan is originated. In addition, sales~~increased number of ~~investment securities generated a $56,000 gain~~deposit accounts from our branch expansion.

Partially offsetting these increases, wealth management revenue decreased by $192,000 for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, as compared to none for the same period in 2016. Loan servicing fees, primarily from prepayment penalties, increased by $26,000 year over year. Partially offsetting these increases, BOLI noninterest income from the change in cash surrender value of our policies decreased by $74,000 during the six months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2017. This decrease is a combined result of a reduction in sales staff and normal fluctuations in the timing and mix of commissions received on these serviced accounts. In addition, sales of investments

available-for-sale generated a net loss of $21,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to ~~the same period in 2016, primarily due to expenses relating to the $4.1 million in additional BOLI policies purchased during the second quarter~~a net gain of ~~2017, as discussed above. Further offsetting our income, our wealth management revenue decreased $44,000~~$56,000 for the ~~first~~ six months ~~of 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 as a result of normal fluctuations in business activity.~~ended June 30, 2017.

Noninterest Expense. Noninterest expense increased ~~$1.1~~$1.6 million to ~~$12.9~~$14.5 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017~~2018, as compared to the same period in ~~2016.~~2017.

The following table provides a detailed analysis of the changes in the components of noninterest expense:


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2017			Change from Six Months Ended June 30, 2016			Percent Change		Six Months Ended June 30, 2018		Change from Six Months Ended June 30, 2017			Percent Change
	(Dollars in thousands)								(Dollars in thousands)
Salaries and employee benefits	$	8,694		$	1,079		14.2	%	$	9,593	$	899		10.3	%
Occupancy and equipment	1,059			63			6.3		1,598		539			50.9
Professional fees	921			(108		)	(10.5	)	770		(151		)	(16.4	)
Data processing	759			318			72.1		675		(84		)	(11.1	)
(Gain) loss on sales of OREO property, net	(5		)	(92		)	(105.7	)
OREO market value adjustments	50			(207		)	(80.5	)
OREO-related expenses, net	(25		)	9			(26.5	)
OREO-related (reimbursements) expenses, net									3		(17		)	(85.0	)
Regulatory assessments	208			(29		)	(12.2	)	265		57			27.4
Insurance and bond premiums	197			23			13.2		260		63			32.0
Marketing	100			22			28.2		184		84			84.0
Other general and administrative	946			(19		)	(2.0	)	1,166		220			23.3
Total noninterest expense	$	12,904		$	1,059		8.9	%	$	14,514	$	1,610		12.5	%

~~Salaries~~The primary contributor to the increase in noninterest expense was our branch expansion over the past year. To support our new branches and the development of new products, our full-time equivalent employees increased to 149 at June 30, 2018, from 129 at June 30, 2017, resulting in an $899,000 increase to our salaries and employee benefits ~~expense~~expense. In addition, occupancy and equipment expenses increased ~~$1.1 million~~by $539,000 with our growth to ten locations at June 30, 2018. Our growth was also reflected by a $220,000 increase in other general and administrative expenses for the ~~first~~ six months ~~of 2017~~ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period in 2016. The number of employees increased from June 30, 2016 to June 30, 2017, as we added employees to support our branch expansions. Data processing increased by $318,000 primarily as a result of the cost of data conversion related to our pending acquisition of four retail branches. These increases were partially offset by a $207,000 decrease in OREO market value adjustments. During the first six months of 2016, we reduced the carrying value of OREO properties by $257,000 primarily as the result of a sales contract on one property. The sale fell through in 2016, however a new sale contract was agreed on during the first six months of 2017, resulting in a $50,000 additional write-down.2017.

Federal Income Tax Expense. ~~Our statutory income tax rate is 35%. We recorded~~Income before federal income ~~tax provisions of $1.7 million and $1.5~~taxes increased by $6.4 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017, and 2016~~2018 as compared to the same period in 2017. As a result of the reduction in our ~~consolidated net income. Our effective~~statutory federal corporate income tax rate to 21% in 2018, we recorded a federal corporate income tax provision of $2.4 million for the six months ended June 30, ~~2017 was 30.3% partially~~2018, as ~~a result of tax benefit from~~compared to $1.7 million for the ~~exercise of stock options earlier in 2017. In comparison, the effective tax rate for~~same period last year. During the six months ended June 30, ~~2016 was 32.1% as a result of the reversal of noninterest income~~2018 and ~~a tax penalty from the early surrender of BOLI policies, partially offset by a benefit from~~2017, the exercise of certain stock ~~options.~~options resulted in a tax benefit, partially offsetting the year-to-date tax provision, however a larger number of stock options were exercised during 2018, resulting in a greater reduction in our tax rate for this period.

Liquidity

We are required to have enough cash flow in order to maintain sufficient liquidity to ensure a safe and sound operation. We maintain cash flows above the minimum level believed to be adequate to meet the requirements of normal operations, including potential deposit outflows. On a daily basis, we review and update cash flow projections to ensure that adequate liquidity is maintained.

Our primary sources of funds are customer deposits, cash flow from the loan and investment portfolios, advances from the FHLB, and to a lesser extent, brokered certificates of deposit. These funds, together with equity, are used to make loans, acquire investment securities and other assets, and fund continuing operations. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, retail certificates of deposit of $161.0 million and brokered certificates of deposit of $29.3 million were scheduled to mature in one year or ~~less totaled $155.3 million.~~less. Management’s practice is to maintain deposit rates at levels that are competitive with other local financial institutions. While maturities and the scheduled amortization of loans are a predictable source of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by the level of interest rates, economic conditions and competition. We measure our liquidity based on our ability to fund our assets and to meet liability obligations when they come due. Liquidity (and funding) risk occurs when funds cannot be raised at reasonable prices or in a reasonable time frame to meet our normal or unanticipated obligations. We regularly monitor the mix between our assets and our liabilities to manage effectively our liquidity and funding requirements.

When deposits are not readily available and/or cost effective to provide the funds for our assets, we use alternative funding sources. These sources include, but are not limited to: advances from the FHLB, which are collateral dependent, wholesale funding, national certificates of deposit listing services, brokered deposits, federal funds purchased and dealer repurchase agreements, as well as other short-term alternatives. ~~These funding sources are generally collateral dependent.~~ We may also liquidate assets to meet our funding needs.

The balance of our investments available-for-sale increased ~~$4.7~~$5.8 million from December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, to ~~$134.0~~$138.1 million at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, and represents a ready source of cash if needed. The balance of our interest-earning deposits with banks ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$14.6~~$7.1 million to $14.1 million at June 30, 2018, from December 31, ~~2016 to June 30,~~ 2017, as ~~we shifted cash into higher yielding assets.~~a result of fluctuations in our funding needs for loans receivable and retail deposits. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Bank maintained credit facilities with the FHLB totaling ~~$370.4~~$428.5 million, with an outstanding balance of ~~$191.5~~$224.0 million. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, we also had available a total of $35.0 million credit facilities with other financial institutions, with no balance outstanding. For additional information, see the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.

To assist in our funds acquisition and interest rate risk management efforts, management utilizes the national brokered deposit market and maintained a balance at June 30, ~~2017~~2018, of $75.5 million of brokered certificates of deposit. In contrast to most retail certificate of deposit offerings which provide the depositor with an option to withdraw their funds prior to maturity, subject to an early withdrawal penalty, certificates of deposit acquired in the brokered market limits the depositor ability to withdraw the funds before the end of the term (except in the case of death or adjudication of incompetence of a depositor) which greatly reduces early redemption risk associated with retail deposits. This strategy may include, but is not necessarily limited to, raising longer term deposits (with terms greater than three years) that assist the Bank in its interest rate risk management efforts. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, brokered certificates of deposit had a remaining maturity of 13up to 4331 months. Most of these certificates also provide the Bank the option to redeem the deposit after six months, a favorable distinction compared to retail certificate of deposit terms that are offered in our local market. With these redemption limitations and call features, the cost of these brokered deposits is generally higher than our retail certificate of deposit offerings. Consequently, as we increase our brokered deposits, our cost of funds may increase.

First Financial Northwest is a separate legal entity from the Bank and, on a stand-alone level, must provide for its own liquidity and pay its own operating expenses and cash dividends. First Financial Northwest's primary sources of funds consist of dividends from the Bank, although there are regulatory requirements related to the ability of the Bank to pay dividends. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Company (on an unconsolidated basis) had liquid assets of ~~$17.7~~$23.2 million and short-term liabilities of ~~$153,000.~~$239,000.

On a monthly basis, we estimate our liquidity sources and needs for the next six months. Also, we determine funding concentrations and our need for sources of funds other than deposits. This information is used by our Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”) in forecasting funding needs and investing opportunities. We believe that our current liquidity position and our expected operating results are sufficient to fund all of our existing commitments.

Commitments and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We are a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of our customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and the unused portions of lines of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Commitments to extend credit and lines of credit are not recorded as an asset or liability by us until the instrument is exercised. At June 30, ~~2017~~2018 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2017, we had no commitments to originate loans for sale.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the loan agreement. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. We evaluate each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of the collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us upon the extension of credit, is based on our credit evaluation of the customer. The amount and type of collateral required varies, but may include real estate and income-producing commercial properties.

The following table summarizes our outstanding commitments to advance additional amounts pursuant to outstanding lines of credit and to disburse funds related to our construction loans at June 30, ~~2017:~~

Amount of Commitment Expiration
Total Amounts Committed Through One Year After One Through Three Years After Three Through Five Years After Five Years
(In thousands)
Unused portion of lines of credit $ 24,136
$ 1,584
$ 14,746
$ 3,321
$ 4,485
Undisbursed portion of construction loans 88,475
37,420
51,055
—
—
Total commitments $ 112,611
$ 39,004
$ 65,801
$ 3,321
$ 4,485
2018:

5354



			Amount of Commitment Expiration
	Total Amounts Committed		Through One Year		After One Through Three Years		After Three Through Five Years		After Five Years
	(In thousands)
Commitments to originate loans	$	1,264	$	1,264	$	—	$	—	$	—
Unused portion of lines of credit	34,262		7,611		12,202		2,055		12,394
Undisbursed portion of construction loans	81,616		52,789		28,827		—		—
Total commitments	$	117,142	$	61,664	$	41,029	$	2,055	$	12,394

We anticipate that we will continue to have sufficient funds and alternative funding sources to meet our current commitments.

As of June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Bank had ~~four~~eight operating leases with ~~initial~~remaining terms of ~~five~~26 months to ~~eight~~seven years which carry minimum lease payments of ~~$18,000~~$39,000 per month. All ~~four~~eight leases offer extension periods. ~~The~~During the first quarter of 2018, the Bank ~~signed a fifth lease agreement~~moved the branch offices in ~~April~~Lake Stevens and Smokey Point, Washington to new leased facilities in those communities, replacing the assumed leases from our 2017 ~~for the~~Branch Acquisition. A new leased branch office in Bothell, Washington ~~that is expected to open~~officially opened in the fourth quarter of 2017. With the pending acquisition of four retail branches, the Bank will assume the leases for the Woodinville, Lake Stevens, and Smokey Point locations when the acquisition is scheduled to close during the third quarter of 2017, subject to DFI approval and other customary closing conditions.April 2018.

First Financial Northwest and its subsidiaries from time to time are involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. There are currently no matters that in the opinion of management would have a material adverse effect on First Financial Northwest’s consolidated financial position, results of operation, or liquidity.

Capital

At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, stockholders’ equity totaled ~~$143.5~~$152.6 million, or ~~13.27%~~12.5% of total assets. Our book value per share of common stock was ~~$13.00~~$13.97 at June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, compared to ~~$12.63~~$13.27 at December 31, ~~2016.~~2017. Consistent with our goal to operate a sound and profitable financial organization, we actively seek to maintain a “well-capitalized” status in accordance with regulatory standards.

As of June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, the Bank and consolidated Company exceeded all regulatory capital requirements and the Bank was considered “well capitalized” under regulatory capital guidelines of the FDIC. The following table provides our capital requirements and actual results.


	At June 30, 2017												At June 30, 2018
	Actual				For Minimum Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be Categorized as “Well Capitalized”				Actual				For Minimum Capital Adequacy Purposes				To be Categorized as “Well Capitalized”
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in thousands)												(Dollars in thousands)
Tier I leverage capital (to average assets)
Bank only	$	122,001	11.46	%	$	42,591	4.00	%	$	53,239	5.00	%	$	125,374	10.22	%	$	49,088	4.00	%	$	61,361	5.00	%
Consolidated	144,498		13.55		42,663		4.00		53,328		5.00		152,619		12.41		49,175		4.00		61,469		5.00
Common equity tier I ("CET1") (to risk-weighted assets)
Bank only	122,001		13.95		39,362		4.50		56,856		6.50		125,374		13.21		42,697		4.50		61,674		6.50
Consolidated	144,498		16.48		39,460		4.50		56,998		6.50		152,619		16.05		42,778		4.50		61,790		6.50
Tier I risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Bank only	122,001		13.95		52,483		6.00		69,977		8.00		125,374		13.21		56,930		6.00		75,907		8.00
Consolidated	144,498		16.48		52,614		6.00		70,152		8.00		152,619		16.05		57,037		6.00		76,049		8.00
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets)
Bank only	132,944		15.20		69,977		8.00		87,471		10.00		137,250		14.47		75,907		8.00		94,883		10.00
Consolidated	155,469		17.73		70,152		8.00		87,690		10.00		164,518		17.31		76,049		8.00		95,061		10.00

In addition to the minimum CET1, Tier 1I total capital and leverage ratios, the Bank is required to maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional CET1 capital above the required minimum levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary bonuses based on percentages of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions. This new capital conservation buffer requirement began to be phased in starting in January 2016 at more than 0.625% of risk-weighted assets and will increase each year until fully implemented to an amount ~~equal to~~more than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets in January 2019. As of June 30, 2018, the conservation buffer was an amount more than 1.25% and First Financial Northwest’s and the Bank’s conservation buffer was 9.31% and 6.47%, respectively.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

General. Our Board of Directors has approved an asset/liability management policy to guide management in maximizing net interest income by managing the differences in terms between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities while maintaining acceptable levels of liquidity, capital adequacy, interest rate sensitivity, credit risk, and profitability. The policy established an ALCO, comprised of certain members of senior management and the Board of Directors. The Committee’s purpose is to manage, coordinate, and communicate our asset/liability position consistent with our business plan and Board-approved policy. The ALCO meets quarterly to review various areas including:

economic conditions;

interest rate outlook;

asset/liability mix;

interest rate risk sensitivity;

current market opportunities to promote specific products;

historical financial results;

projected financial results; and

capital position.

Additionally, the Committee reviews current and projected liquidity needs. As part of its procedures, the ALCO regularly reviews our interest rate risk by modeling the impact that changes in interest rates may have on earnings, particularly net interest income. The market value of portfolio equity, which is the net present value of an institution’s existing assets less its liabilities and off-balance sheet instruments, is also modeled under several scenarios of changing interest rates. In both cases, results are evaluated and compared with the maximum potential change that is authorized by the Board of Directors.

Our Risk When Interest Rates Change. The rates of interest we earn on assets and pay on liabilities generally are established contractually for a period of time. Market interest rates change over time. Our loans generally have longer maturities than our deposits. Accordingly, our results of operations, like those of other financial institutions, are impacted by changes in interest rates and the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities. The risk associated with changes in interest rates and our ability to adapt to these changes is known as interest rate risk and is our most significant market risk.

We have utilized the following strategies in our efforts to manage interest rate risk:

•we are originating shorter term higher yielding loans, whenever possible;

we have attempted, where possible, to extend the maturities of our deposits which typically fund our long-term assets;

•we have invested in securities with relatively short average lives, generally less than eight years;

•we have added adjustable-rate loans to our loan portfolio;

•we ~~have added~~utilize brokered certificates of deposit with a call option as a ~~new~~ funding source; and

•we have utilized an interest rate swap to effectively fix the rate on $50.0 million of FHLB advances.

We have evaluated the use of derivative instruments to limit the impact of interest rate changes on earnings, prepayment penalties and cash flows and to lower our cost of borrowing while taking into account variable interest rate risk. On October 25, 2016, the Bank entered into a Cash Flow Hedge agreement to effectively fix the rate for five years on $50.0 million of short-term FHLB advances. We are using this interest rate swap as a tool to lower the cost of certain FHLB advances as compared to the fixed rates offered by the FHLB for its longer term advances. At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, pursuant to the Cash Flow Hedge agreement we held a $50.0 million notional pay fixed, receive floating cash flow hedge. The Bank pays a fixed rate of 1.34% for five years and in turn, ~~will receive~~receives an interest payment based on three-month LIBOR, which resets quarterly. The hedge instrument is a $50.0 million FHLB fixed-rate three-month advance that is renewed at the fixed rate at ~~that time.~~maturity. Entering into this hedge agreement has allowed the Bank to secure fixed rate funding at a lower cost than a traditional five-year fixed rate FHLB advance. We will continue to review similar instruments and may utilize them for interest rate risk management in the future.

Interest rate contracts, however, may expose us to the risk of loss associated with variations in the spread between the interest rate contract and the hedged item. In addition, these contracts carry volatility risk that the expected uncertainty relating to

the price of the underlying asset differs from what is anticipated. If any interest rate swaps we enter into prove ineffective, it could

result in volatility in our operating results, including potential losses, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.

Brokered Deposits. ~~During the third quarter of 2014, management added~~Management utilizes the national brokered deposit market as an additional source of funds and to assist efforts in managing interest rate risk. Utilizing brokered deposits might result in increased regulatory scrutiny, as such deposits are not viewed as favorably as core retail deposits and there can be no assurance that the Bank will be allowed to include brokered deposits in its deposit mix in the future. While management will attempt to weigh the benefits of brokered deposits against the costs and risks, there can be no assurance that its conclusions will necessarily be aligned with those of the Bank’s regulators.

How We Measure the Risk of Interest Rate Changes. We monitor our interest rate sensitivity on a quarterly basis to measure the change in projected net interest income in varying rate environments. Management uses various assumptions to evaluate the sensitivity of our operations to changes in interest rates. Although management believes these assumptions are reasonable, the interest rate sensitivity of our assets and liabilities on net interest income and the market value of portfolio equity could vary substantially if different assumptions were used or actual experience differs from these assumptions. Although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods of repricing, they may react differently to changes in market interest rates. The interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities lag behind changes in market interest rates. Non-uniform changes and fluctuations in market interest rates across various maturities will also affect the results presented. In addition, certain assets, such as adjustable-rate mortgage loans, have features which restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. A portion of our adjustable-rate loans have interest rate floors below which the loan’s contractual interest rate may not adjust. Approximately ~~45.3%~~50.8% of our total loans, net of LIP, were adjustable-rate loans at June 30, ~~2017.~~2018. At that date, ~~$105.2~~$215.7 million, or ~~26.5%~~42.4% of these loans were at their floor, with a weighted-average interest rate of ~~4.01%~~4.23%.

The inability of our loans to adjust downward can contribute to increased income in periods of declining interest rates. However, when loans are at their floors, there is a risk that our interest income may not increase as rapidly as our cost of funds during periods of increasing interest rates. Furthermore, in the event of a significant change in interest rates, prepayment and early withdrawal levels would likely deviate from those assumed. Finally, the ability of many borrowers to service their debt may decrease in the event of an interest rate increase. We consider all these factors in monitoring our interest rate exposure.

The assumptions we use are based upon a combination of proprietary and market data that reflect historical results and current market conditions. These assumptions relate to interest rates, loan prepayments, deposit decay rates and the market value of certain assets under the various interest rate scenarios. We use market data to determine prepayments and maturities of loans, investments and borrowings and use our own assumptions on deposit decay rates. ~~The exception to this is time~~Time deposits ~~which~~ are modeled to reprice at rates that change in proportion to market rates upon their stated maturities. We also assume that non-maturity ~~deposits~~deposit rates can be maintained with rate adjustments ~~not directly~~ proportionate to the change in market interest rates, based upon our historical deposit ~~decay rates which are substantially lower than market~~ decay rates. We have demonstrated in the past that the tiering structure of our deposit accounts during changing rate environments results in relatively lower volatility and less than market rate changes in our interest expense for deposits. We tier our deposit accounts by balance and rate, whereby higher balances within an account earn higher rates of interest. Therefore, deposits that are not very rate sensitive (generally, lower balance tiers) are separated from deposits that are rate sensitive (generally, higher balance tiers). When interest rates rise, we do not have to raise interest rates proportionately on less rate sensitive accounts to retain these deposits. These assumptions are based upon our analysis of our customer base, competitive factors and historical experience.

Our income simulation model examines changes in net interest income in which interest rates were assumed to remain at their base level, instantaneously increase by 100, 200 and 300 basis points or decline immediately by 100 basis points. Reductions of rates by 200 and 300 basis points were not reported due to the current low rate environment.

The following table illustrates the change in our net interest income at June 30, ~~2017~~2018, that would occur in the event of an instantaneous change in interest rates equally across all maturities, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement.

5658


Net Interest Income Change at June 30, 2017
Net Interest Income Change at June 30, 2018					Net Interest Income Change at June 30, 2018
Basis Point Change in Rates	Net Interest Income		% Change			Net Interest Income		% Change
(Dollars in thousands)
+300	$	34,345	(1.65	)%		$	35,786	(6.10	)%
+200	34,553		(1.06	)		36,558		(4.07	)
+100	34,817		(0.30	)		37,386		(1.90	)
Base	34,922		—			38,110		—
(100)	34,797		(0.36	)		37,634		(1.25	)

The following table illustrates the change in our net portfolio value (“NPV”) at June 30, ~~2017~~2018, that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates equally across all maturities, with no effect given to any steps that we might take to counter the effect of that interest rate movement.


Basis Point								Net Portfolio as % of				Market									Net Portfolio as % of				Market
Change in	Net Portfolio Value⁽¹⁾							Portfolio Value of Assets				Value of		Net Portfolio Value⁽¹⁾							Portfolio Value of Assets				Value of
Rates	Amount		$ Change ⁽²⁾			% Change		NPV Ratio ⁽³⁾		% Change ⁽⁴⁾		Assets ⁽⁵⁾		Amount		$ Change ⁽²⁾			% Change		NPV Ratio ⁽³⁾		% Change ⁽⁴⁾		Assets ⁽⁵⁾
	(Dollars in thousands)													(Dollars in thousands)
+300	$	125,628	$	(33,700	)	(21.15	)%	12.46	%	(3.11	)%	$	1,008,238	$	123,361	$	(41,984	)	(25.39	)%	11.00	%	(3.48	)%	$	1,121,810
+200	136,764		(22,564		)	(14.16	)	13.24		(2.08	)	1,032,991		136,425		(28,920		)	(17.49	)	11.88		(2.40	)	1,148,280
+100	149,542		(9,786		)	(6.14	)	14.11		(0.90	)	1,060,033		151,844		(13,501		)	(8.17	)	12.89		(1.12	)	1,177,835
Base	159,328		—			—		14.69		—		1,084,760		165,345		—			—		13.71		—		1,206,133
(100)	164,943		5,615			3.52		14.90		0.52		1,107,219		172,657		7,312			4.42		14.01		0.61		1,232,480

_____________

⁽¹⁾ The net portfolio value is the difference between the present value of the discounted cash flows of assets and liabilities and represents the market value of the Company’s equity for any given interest rate scenario. Net portfolio value is useful for determining, on a market value basis, how the market value of equity changes in response to various interest rate scenarios. Large changes in net portfolio value reflect increased interest rate sensitivity and generally more volatile earnings streams.

⁽²⁾ The increase or decrease in net portfolio value at the indicated interest rates compared to the net portfolio value assuming no change in interest rates.

⁽³⁾ Net portfolio value divided by the market value of assets.

⁽⁴⁾ The increase or decrease in the net portfolio value divided by the market value of assets.

⁽⁵⁾ The market value of assets represents the value of assets under the various interest rate scenarios and reflects the sensitivity of those assets to interest rate changes.

The net interest income and net portfolio value tables presented above are predicated upon a stable balance sheet with no growth or change in asset or liability mix. In addition, the net portfolio value is based upon the present value of discounted cash flows using our estimates of current replacement rates to discount the cash flows. The effects of changes in interest rates in the net interest income table are based upon a cash flow simulation of our existing assets and liabilities and assuming that delinquency rates would not change as a result of changes in interest rates, although there can be no assurance that this will be the case. Delinquency rates may change when interest rates change as a result of changes in the loan portfolio mix, underwriting conditions, loan terms or changes in economic conditions that have a delayed effect on the portfolio. Even if interest rates change in the designated amounts, there can be no assurance that our assets and liabilities would perform as set forth above. Also, a change in U.S. Treasury rates in the designated amounts accompanied by a change in the shape of the Treasury yield curve would cause changes to the net portfolio value and net interest income other than those indicated above.

At June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, other than the interest rate swap we entered into through the Cash Flow Hedge agreement, we did not have any derivative financial instruments or trading accounts for any class of financial instruments, nor have we engaged in any other hedging activities or purchased off-balance sheet derivative instruments. However, we continue to review such instruments and may utilize them for interest rate risk management in the future. Interest rate risk continues to be one of our primary risks, as other types of risks, such as foreign currency exchange risk and commodity pricing risk do not arise in the normal course of our business activities and operations.

5759

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The management of First Financial Northwest, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that its objectives are met. Also, because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. As a result of these inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Furthermore, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

(a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures: An evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) and several other members of our senior management as of the end of the period covered by this report. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to our management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.


(b)	Changes in Internal Controls: In the quarter ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, there was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are engaged in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, none of which are currently considered to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our ~~2016~~2017 Form 10-K.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Not applicable

(b) Not applicable

(c) ~~The following table summarizes First Financial Northwest’s common stock repurchases during the second quarter of 2017, under the repurchase plan effective May 30, 2017 through November 30, 2017:~~Not applicable

Period Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid per Share Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Repurchased Under the Plan

April 1 - April 30, 2017 n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
May 1 - May 31, 2017 —
—
—
1,100,000
June 1 - June 30, 2017 22,700
$ 15.93
22,700
1,077,300
22,700
22,700

On May 22, 2017, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 1,100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, or 10% of the Company’s outstanding shares. Shares are repurchased under a pre-arranged stock trading plan in accordance with guidelines specified under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1034, as amended.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

Not applicable.

5961

Item 6. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

(a) Exhibits



3.1			Articles of Incorporation of First Financial Northwest⁽¹⁾
3.2			Amended and Restated Bylaws of First Financial Northwest⁽²⁾
4.0			Form of stock certificate of First Financial Northwest⁽¹⁾
10.1			Amended Employment Agreement between First Savings Bank Northwest and Joseph W. Kiley III⁽³⁾
10.2			Form of Change in Control Severance Agreement for Executive Officers⁽⁴⁾
10.3			Amended Executive Supplemental Retirement Plan Participation Agreement with Joseph W. Kiley III⁽⁵⁾
10.4			2008 Equity Incentive Plan⁽⁶⁾
10.5			2016 Equity Incentive Plan⁽⁷⁾
10.6			Forms of incentive and non-qualified stock option award agreements⁽⁸⁾
10.7			Form of restricted stock award agreement⁽⁸⁾
10.8			Employment Agreement between First Savings Bank Northwest and Richard P. Jacobson⁽³⁾
10.9			Separation Agreement and General Release between First Financial Northwest Bank and Gregg DeRitis and dated August 31, 2017⁽⁹⁾
10.10			Form of restricted stock award agreement under the 2016 Equity Incentive Plan⁽¹⁰⁾
31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32			Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
101			The following materials from First Financial Northwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (2) Consolidated Income Statements; (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (4) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (6) Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

_____________


⁽¹⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 on June 6, 2007 (333-143539)


⁽²⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2017.


⁽³⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated December 5, 2013.


⁽⁴⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 9, 2014.


⁽⁵⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 11, 2017.


⁽⁶⁾	Filed as Appendix A to First Financial Northwest’s definitive proxy statement dated April 15, 2008.


⁽⁷⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 15, 2016.


⁽⁸⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 1, 2008.


⁽⁹⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 2017.


⁽¹⁰⁾	Filed as an exhibit to First Financial Northwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for March 31, 2018 filed on May 8, 2018.

6062

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	FIRST FINANCIAL NORTHWEST, INC.

Date: August ~~7, 2017~~8, 2018	By:	/s/Joseph W. Kiley III
		Joseph W. Kiley III
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



Date: August ~~7, 2017~~8, 2018	By:	/s/Richard P. Jacobson
		Richard P. Jacobson
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

Date: August ~~7, 2017~~8, 2018	By:	/s/Christine A. Huestis
		Christine A. Huestis
		Vice President and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

6163

Exhibit Index



Exhibit No.			Description
31.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
31.2			Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
32			Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
101			The following materials from First Financial Northwest’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2017,~~2018, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (2) Consolidated Income Statements; (3) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (4) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity; (5) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (6) Selected Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

6264



Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Repurchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan	Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Repurchased Under the Plan

April 1 - April 30, 2017	n/a	n/a		n/a	n/a
May 1 - May 31, 2017	—	—		—	1,100,000
June 1 - June 30, 2017	22,700	$	15.93	22,700	1,077,300
	22,700			22,700