UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X]

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


	For the quarterly period ended		March 31, ~~2019~~2020

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________________ to _________________

Commission File Number 000-28304

PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		33-0704889
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

3756 Central Avenue, Riverside, California 92506

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(951) 686-6060

(~~Registrant's~~Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

_________________________________________________________

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class		Trading Symbol(s)		Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.01 per share		PROV		The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). [X] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of ~~"large~~“large accelerated filer,~~" "accelerated~~” “accelerated filer,~~" "smaller~~” “smaller reporting company,"” and ~~"emerging~~“emerging growth ~~company"~~company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

~~Large accelerated filer [ ]~~

	Large accelerated filer [ ]		Accelerated filer [X]
	Non-accelerated filer [ ]		Smaller reporting company [X]
			Emerging growth company [ ]

~~Non-accelerated filer [ ] Smaller reporting company [X] Emerging growth company [ ]~~

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

[ ] Yes [X] No

~~Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:~~

~~Title of each class~~		~~Trading~~ ~~Symbol(s)~~		~~Name of each exchange on which registered~~
~~Common stock, par value $0.01 per share~~		~~PROV~~		~~The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC~~

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the ~~issuer's~~issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

As of ~~May 3, 2019~~April 30, 2020 there were ~~7,497,357~~7,436,315 shares of the registrant's common stock, $0.01 par value per share, outstanding.

PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

Table of Contents

PART 1 -	FINANCIAL INFORMATION		Page

ITEM 1 -	Financial Statements. The Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. filed as a part of the report are as follows:

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
		as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018~~2019	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
		for the ~~Quarters~~Quarter and Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
		for the ~~Quarters~~Quarter and Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Stockholders'~~Stockholders’ Equity
		for the ~~Quarters~~Quarter and Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
		for the Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	6
	Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		7

ITEM 2 -	~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations:

	General		50 42
	Safe-Harbor Statement		51 43
	Critical Accounting Policies		52 44
	Executive Summary and Operating Strategy		53 45
	Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements and Contractual Obligations		55 47
	Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018~~2019		55 48
	Comparison of Operating Results
		for the ~~Quarters~~Quarter and Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019	57 49
	Asset Quality		68 61
	Loan Volume Activities		77 64
	Liquidity and Capital Resources		78 64
	Supplemental Information		80 66

ITEM 3 -	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		80 67

ITEM 4 -	Controls and Procedures		84 71

PART II -	OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1 -	Legal Proceedings		85 71
ITEM 1A -	Risk Factors		85 72
ITEM 2 -	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		85 73
ITEM 3 -	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		86 73
ITEM 4 -	Mine Safety Disclosures		86 73
ITEM 5 -	Other Information		86 74
ITEM 6 -	Exhibits		86 74

SIGNATURES			89 75

PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

(Unaudited)

In Thousands, Except Share Information

March 31,
2019

June 30,
2018

Assets
   Cash and cash equivalents $ 61,458 $ 43,301
   Investment securities – held to maturity, at cost 102,510 87,813
   Investment securities – available for sale, at fair value 6,294 7,496
   Loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses of
$7,080 and $7,385, respectively; includes $5,239 and $5,234 at fair value, respectively
883,554 902,685
   Loans held for sale, at fair value 30,500 96,298
   Accrued interest receivable 3,386 3,212
   Real estate owned, net — 906
   Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") – San Francisco stock 8,199 8,199
   Premises and equipment, net 8,395 8,696
   Prepaid expenses and other assets 15,099 16,943

          Total assets $ 1,119,395 $ 1,175,549

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity

Liabilities:
   Non interest-bearing deposits $ 90,875 $ 86,174
   Interest-bearing deposits 786,009 821,424
          Total deposits 876,884 907,598

   Borrowings 101,121 126,163
   Accounts payable, accrued interest and other liabilities 20,181 21,331
          Total liabilities 998,186 1,055,092

Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 7 and 11)

Stockholders' equity:
   Preferred stock, $.01 par value (2,000,000 shares authorized;
none issued and outstanding)
— —
   Common stock, $.01 par value (40,000,000 shares authorized;
18,064,365 and 18,033,115 shares issued; 7,497,357 and
7,421,426 shares outstanding, respectively)
181 181
   Additional paid-in capital 96,114 94,957
   Retained earnings 191,103 190,616
   Treasury stock at cost (10,567,008 and 10,611,689 shares, respectively) (166,352 ) (165,507 )
   Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax 163 210

          Total stockholders' equity 121,209 120,457

          Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 1,119,395 $ 1,175,549

	March 31, 2020			June 30, 2019
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	84,250		$	70,632
Investment securities – held to maturity, at cost	69,482			94,090
Investment securities – available for sale, at fair value	4,828			5,969
Loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses of $7,810 and $7,076, respectively; includes $3,835 and $5,094 at fair value, respectively	914,307			879,925
Accrued interest receivable	3,154			3,424
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) – San Francisco stock	8,199			8,199
Premises and equipment, net	10,606			8,226
Prepaid expenses and other assets	12,741			14,385
Total assets	$	1,107,567		$	1,084,850

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Liabilities:
Non interest-bearing deposits	$	86,585		$	90,184
Interest-bearing deposits	749,246			751,087
Total deposits	835,831			841,271

Borrowings	131,070			101,107
Accounts payable, accrued interest and other liabilities	17,508			21,831
Total liabilities	984,409			964,209

Commitments and Contingencies (Notes 6 and 10)

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $.01 par value (2,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding)	—			—
Common stock, $.01 par value (40,000,000 shares authorized; 18,097,615 and 18,081,365 shares issued; 7,436,315 and 7,486,106 shares outstanding, respectively)	181			181
Additional paid-in capital	95,355			94,351
Retained earnings	193,802			190,839
Treasury stock at cost (10,661,300 and 10,595,259 shares, respectively)	(166,247		)	(164,891		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax	67			161

Total stockholders’ equity	123,158			120,641

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,107,567		$	1,084,850

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

In Thousands, Except Per Share Information

	Quarter Ended March 31,						Nine Months Ended March 31,						Quarter Ended March 31,					Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020		2019			2020			2019
Interest income:
Loans receivable, net	$	10,011		$	9,933		$	30,516		$	29,825		$	9,622	$	10,011		$	30,017		$	30,516
Investment securities		592			382			1,381			958			478		592			1,659			1,381
FHLB – San Francisco stock		144			144			565			428			144		144			432			565
Interest-earning deposits		386			233			1,111			591			186		386			621			1,111
Total interest income		11,133			10,692			33,573			31,802			10,430		11,133			32,729			33,573

Interest expense:
Checking and money market deposits		102			96			327			311			106		102			333			327
Savings deposits		139			147			437			445			131		139			396			437
Time deposits		600			613			1,851			1,877			509		600			1,571			1,851
Borrowings		680			712			2,158			2,176			794		680			2,318			2,158
Total interest expense		1,521			1,568			4,773			4,809			1,540		1,521			4,618			4,773

Net interest income		9,612			9,124			28,800			26,993			8,890		9,612			28,111			28,800
Provision (recovery) for loan losses		4			(505	)		(450	)		(347	)		874		4			671			(450	)
Net interest income, after provision (recovery) for loan losses		9,608			9,629			29,250			27,340			8,016		9,608			27,440			29,250

Non-interest income:
Loan servicing and other fees		262			493			863			1,173			131		262			631			863
Gain on sale of loans, net		1,719			3,597			7,114			12,761
Gain (loss) on sale of loans, net														14		1,719			(115	)		7,114
Deposit account fees		471			529			1,485			1,623			423		471			1,321			1,485
Gain (loss) on sale and operations of real estate owned acquired in the settlement of loans, net		2			(19	)		(4	)		(81	)		—		2			—			(4	)
Card and processing fees		373			372			1,163			1,126			360		373			1,121			1,163
Other		225			238			575			701			173		225			557			575
Total non-interest income		3,052			5,210			11,196			17,303			1,101		3,052			3,515			11,196

Non-interest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits ⁽¹⁾		9,292			8,808			24,753			26,710			4,966		9,292			14,950			24,753
Premises and occupancy		1,286			1,255			3,905			3,829			845		1,286			2,603			3,905
Equipment		417			442			1,333			1,179			314		417			855			1,333
Professional expenses		513			400			1,371			1,441			351		513			1,090			1,371
Sales and marketing expenses		246			213			668			717			177		246			506			668
Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory assessments		124			189			461			591			54		124			97			461
Other ⁽²⁾		1,122			1,132			3,088			6,919
Other														798		1,122			2,196			3,088
Total non-interest expense		13,000			12,439			35,579			41,386			7,505		13,000			22,297			35,579

Income (loss) before income taxes		(340	)		2,400			4,867			3,257			1,612		(340	)		8,658			4,867
Provision (benefit) for income taxes ⁽³⁾		(189	)		667			1,237			2,526			467		(189	)		2,553			1,237
Net income (loss)	$	(151	)	$	1,733		$	3,630		$	731		$	1,145	$	(151	)	$	6,105		$	3,630

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.02	)	$	0.23		$	0.49		$	0.10		$	0.15	$	(0.02	)	$	0.82		$	0.49	��
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.02	)	$	0.23		$	0.48		$	0.09		$	0.15	$	(0.02	)	$	0.80		$	0.48
Cash dividends per share	$	0.14		$	0.14		$	0.42		$	0.42		$	0.14	$	0.14		$	0.42		$	0.42

⁽¹⁾	~~Includes $1.5 million of costs associated with staff reductions in mortgage banking operations during the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2019.~~

⁽²⁾	~~Includes $3.4 million of litigation settlement expense for the nine months ended March 31, 2018.~~

⁽³⁾	~~Includes a net tax charge of $1.9 million resulting from the revaluation of net deferred tax assets consistent with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for the nine months ended March 31, 2018.~~

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Unaudited)

In Thousands

	For the Quarters Ended March 31,						For the Nine Months Ended March 31,						For the Quarter Ended March 31,						For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019			2020			2019
Net income (loss)	$	(151	)	$	1,733		$	3,630		$	731		$	1,145		$	(151	)	$	6,105		$	3,630

Change in unrealized holding loss on securities available for sale		(9	)		(35	)		(67	)		(113	)		(94	)		(9	)		(133	)		(67	)
Reclassification adjustment for net income (loss) on securities available for sale included in net income (loss)		—			(2	)		—			43
Other comprehensive loss, before income taxes		(9	)		(37	)		(67	)		(70	)
Reclassification adjustment for net loss on securities available for sale included in net loss														—			—			—			—
Other comprehensive loss, before income tax benefit														(94	)		(9	)		(133	)		(67	)

Income tax benefit		(3	)		(13	)		(20	)		(27	)		(28	)		(3	)		(39	)		(20	)
Other comprehensive loss		(6	)		(24	)		(47	)		(43	)		(66	)		(6	)		(94	)		(47	)

Total comprehensive income (loss)	$	(157	)	$	1,709		$	3,583		$	688		$	1,079		$	(157	)	$	6,011		$	3,583

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity

(Unaudited)

In Thousands, Except Share Information

For the ~~Quarters~~Quarter Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

	Common Stock					Additional Paid-In		Retained			Treasury			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss),							Common Stock					Additional Paid-In		Retained			Treasury			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss),
	Shares			Amount		Capital		Earnings			Stock			Net of Tax			Total				Shares			Amount		Capital		Earnings			Stock			Net of Tax			Total
Balance at December 31, 2018		7,506,855		$	181	$	95,913	$	192,306		$	(165,892	)	$	169		$	122,677
Balance at December 31, 2019																						7,483,071		$	181	$	95,118	$	193,704		$	(165,360	)	$	133		$	123,776

Net loss									(151	)								(151	)
Net income																													1,145									1,145
Other comprehensive loss															(6	)		(6	)																(66	)		(66	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(23,748	)									(460	)					(460	)			(46,756	)									(887	)					(887	)
Exercise of stock options		11,250					164											164
Distribution of restricted stock		3,000																—
Amortization of restricted stock							29											29		Amortization of restricted stock							217											217
Stock options expense							8											8									20											20
Cash dividends ⁽¹⁾									(1,052	)								(1,052	)										(1,047	)								(1,047	)

Balance at March 31, 2019		7,497,357		$	181	$	96,114	$	191,103		$	(166,352	)	$	163		$	121,209
Balance at March 31, 2020																						7,436,315		$	181	$	95,355	$	193,802		$	(166,247	)	$	67		$	123,158

⁽¹⁾	Cash dividends of $0.14 per share were paid in the quarter ended March 31, 2020.

	Common Stock					Additional Paid-In		Retained			Treasury			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss),
	Shares			Amount		Capital		Earnings			Stock			Net of Tax			Total
Balance at December 31, 2018		7,506,855		$	181	$	95,913	$	192,306		$	(165,892	)	$	169		$	122,677

Net loss									(151	)								(151	)
Other comprehensive loss															(6	)		(6	)
Purchase of treasury stock		(23,748	)									(460	)					(460	)
Exercise of stock options		11,250					164											164
Distribution of restricted stock		3,000																—
Amortization of restricted stock							29											29
Stock options expense							8											8
Cash dividends ⁽¹⁾									(1,052	)								(1,052	)

Balance at March 31, 2019		7,497,357		$	181	$	96,114	$	191,103		$	(166,352	)	$	163		$	121,209

⁽¹⁾	Cash dividends of $0.14 per share were paid in the quarter ended March 31, 2019.

Common
Stock
Additional
Paid-In Retained Treasury
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),

Shares Amount Capital Earnings Stock Net of Tax Total
Balance at December 31, 2017 7,474,776 $ 180 $ 94,011 $ 189,610 $ (163,311 ) $ 210 $ 120,700

Net income 1,733 1,733
Other comprehensive loss (24 ) (24 )
Purchase of treasury stock ⁽¹⁾
(80,972 ) (1,475 ) (1,475 )
Exercise of stock options 56,500 416 416
Distribution of restricted stock 10,500 --
Amortization of restricted stock 167 167
Stock options expense 125 125
Cash dividends ⁽²⁾
(1,042 ) (1,042 )

Balance at March 31, 2018 7,460,804 $ 180 $ 94,719 $ 190,301 $ (164,786 ) $ 186 $ 120,600

⁽¹⁾	~~Includes the repurchase of 3,291 shares of distributed restricted stock in settlement of employee withholding tax obligations.~~

⁽²⁾	~~Cash dividends of $0.14 per share were paid in the quarter ended March 31, 2018.~~

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

	Common Stock					Additional Paid-In		Retained			Treasury			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss),						Common Stock					Additional Paid-In		Retained			Treasury			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss),
	Shares			Amount		Capital		Earnings			Stock			Net of Tax			Total			Shares			Amount		Capital		Earnings			Stock			Net of Tax			Total
Balance at June 30, 2018		7,421,426		$	181	$	94,957	$	190,616		$	(165,507	)	$	210		$	120,457
Balance at June 30, 2019																					7,486,106		$	181	$	94,351	$	190,839		$	(164,891	)	$	161		$	120,641

Net income									3,630									3,630										6,105									6,105
Other comprehensive loss															(47	)		(47	)															(94	)		(94	)
Purchase of treasury stock ⁽¹⁾		(44,819	)									(845	)					(845	)		(66,041	)									(1,284	)					(1,284	)
Exercise of stock options		31,250					390											390			16,250					215											215
Distribution of restricted stock		89,500																—
Forfeiture of restricted stock																										72					72						—
Amortization of restricted stock							426											426								656											656
Stock options expense							341											341								61											61
Cash dividends ⁽²⁾⁽¹⁾									(3,143	)								(3,143	)									(3,142	)								(3,142	)

Balance at March 31, 2019		7,497,357		$	181	$	96,114	$	191,103		$	(166,352	)	$	163		$	121,209
Balance at March 31, 2020																					7,436,315		$	181	$	95,355	$	193,802		$	(166,247	)	$	67		$	123,158

⁽¹⁾Cash dividends of $0.42 per share were paid in the nine months ended March 31, 2020.

	Common Stock					Additional Paid-In		Retained			Treasury			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss),
	Shares			Amount		Capital		Earnings			Stock			Net of Tax			Total
Balance at June 30, 2018		7,421,426		$	181	$	94,957	$	190,616		$	(165,507	)	$	210		$	120,457

Net income									3,630									3,630
Other comprehensive loss															(47	)		(47	)
Purchase of treasury stock ⁽¹⁾		(44,819	)									(845	)					(845	)
Exercise of stock options		31,250					390											390
Distribution of restricted stock		89,500																—
Amortization of restricted stock							426											426
Stock options expense							341											341
Cash dividends ⁽²⁾									(3,143	)								(3,143	)

Balance at March 31, 2019		7,497,357		$	181	$	96,114	$	191,103		$	(166,352	)	$	163		$	121,209

⁽¹⁾Includes the ~~repurchase~~purchase of 21,071 shares of distributed restricted stock in settlement of employee withholding tax obligations^.

⁽²⁾Cash dividends of $0.42 per share were paid in the nine months ended March 31, 2019.

Common
Stock

Additional
Paid-In
Retained Treasury
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),

Shares Amount Capital Earnings Stock Net of Tax Total
Balance at June 30, 2017 7,714,052 $ 180 $ 93,209 $ 192,754 $ (158,142 ) $ 229 $ 128,230

Net income 731 731
Other comprehensive loss (43 ) (43 )
Purchase of treasury stock ⁽¹⁾
(347,498 ) (6,627 ) (6,627 )
Exercise of stock options 83,750 677 677
Distribution of restricted stock 10,500 --
Amortization of restricted stock 458 458
Forfeitures of restricted stock 17 (17 ) —
Stock options expense 358 358
Cash dividends ⁽²⁾
(3,184 ) (3,184 )

Balance at March 31, 2018 7,460,804 $ 180 $ 94,719 $ 190,301 $ (164,786 ) $ 186 $ 120,600

⁽¹⁾~~Includes the repurchase of 3,291 shares of distributed restricted stock in settlement of employee withholding tax obligations.~~

⁽²⁾~~Cash dividends of $0.42 per share were paid in the nine months ended March 31, 2018.~~

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited - In Thousands)

	Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	6,105		$	3,630
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		2,347			2,045
Provision (recovery) for loan losses		671			(450	)
(Gain) loss on sale of loans, net		115			(7,114	)
Stock-based compensation		717			767
Provision for deferred income taxes		881			553
Decrease in accounts payable, accrued interest and other liabilities		(4,406	)		(320	)
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other assets		(2,524	)		437
Loans originated for sale		—			(453,444	)
Proceeds from sale of loans		—			526,090
Net cash provided by operating activities		3,906			72,194

Cash flows from investing activities:
(Increase) decrease in loans held for investment, net		(35,676	)		19,230
Maturity of investment securities held to maturity		—			800
Principal payments from investment securities held to maturity		24,283			24,093
Principal payments from investment securities available for sale		1,010			1,140
Purchase of investment securities held to maturity		—			(40,282	)
Proceeds from sale of real estate owned		—			915
Purchase of premises and equipment		(185	)		(151	)
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities		(10,568	)		5,745

Cash flows from financing activities:
Decrease in deposits, net		(5,440	)		(30,714	)
Repayments of short-term borrowings, net		—			(15,000	)
Repayments of long-term borrowings		(44	)		(10,042	)
Proceeds from long-term borrowings		30,007			—
Exercise of stock options		215			390
Withholding taxes on stock based compensation		(32	)		(428	)
Cash dividends		(3,142	)		(3,143	)
Treasury stock purchases		(1,284	)		(845	)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities		20,280			(59,782	)

Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		13,618			18,157
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		70,632			43,301
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	84,250		$	61,458
Supplemental information:
Cash paid for interest	$	4,625		$	4,796
Cash paid for income taxes	$	775		$	1,555
Transfer of loans held for sale to held for investment	$	1,085		$	1,360

Nine Months Ended March 31,
2019 2018
Cash flows from operating activities:
   Net income $ 3,630 $ 731
   Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
      Depreciation and amortization 2,045 2,229
      Recovery from the allowance for loan losses (450 ) (347 )
      Recovery of losses on real estate owned — (552 )
      Gain on sale of loans, net (7,114 ) (12,761 )
      (Gain) loss on sale of real estate owned, net (9 ) 564
      Stock-based compensation 767 816
      Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes 553 (28 )
   (Decrease) increase in accounts payable, accrued interest and other liabilities (320 ) 3,294
   Decrease (increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets 446 (482 )
   Loans originated for sale (453,444 ) (944,349 )
   Proceeds from sale of loans 526,090 983,504
         Net cash provided by operating activities 72,194 32,619

Cash flows from investing activities:
   Decrease in loans held for investment, net 19,230 8,956
   Maturity of investment securities held to maturity 800 200
   Principal payments from investment securities held to maturity 24,093 17,882
   Principal payments from investment securities available for sale 1,140 1,252
   Purchase of investment securities held to maturity (40,282 ) (54,147 )
   Proceeds from sale of real estate owned 915 2,223
   Purchase of premises and equipment (151 ) (2,713 )
         Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities 5,745 (26,347 )

Cash flows from financing activities:
   Decrease in deposits, net (30,714 ) (4,022 )
   Repayments of short-term borrowings, net (15,000 ) (15,000 )
   Repayments of long-term borrowings (10,042 ) (10,050 )
   Proceeds from long-term borrowings — 10,000
   Exercise of stock options 390 677
   Withholding taxes on stock based compensation (428 ) (318 )
   Cash dividends (3,143 ) (3,184 )
   Treasury stock purchases (845 ) (6,627 )
         Net cash used for financing activities (59,782 ) (28,524 )

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 18,157 (22,252 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 43,301 72,826
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 61,458 $ 50,574
Supplemental information:
   Cash paid for interest $ 4,796 $ 4,816
   Cash paid for income taxes $ 1,555 $ 2,400
   Transfer of loans held for sale to held for investment $ 1,360 $ 1,122
   Real estate acquired in the settlement of loans $ — $ 1,659

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

PROVIDENT FINANCIAL HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, ~~2019~~2020

Note 1: Basis of Presentation

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of the results of operations for the interim periods presented. All such adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature. The condensed consolidated statement of financial condition at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. (the ~~"Bank"~~“Bank”) (collectively, the ~~"Corporation"~~“Corporation”). Certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ~~("GAAP"~~(“GAAP”) have been omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission ~~("SEC"~~(“SEC”) with respect to interim financial reporting. It is recommended that these unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The results of operations for the quarter ~~and nine months~~ ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year ending June 30, ~~2019.~~2020.

Note 2: Accounting Standard Updates ~~("ASU"~~(“ASU”)

There have been no accounting standard updates or changes in the status of their adoption that are significant to the Corporation as previously disclosed in Note 1 of the Corporation's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, other than:

ASU ~~2014-09:~~2016-13:

In ~~May 2014,~~June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ~~("FASB"~~(“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers," which created FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 606 ("ASC 606"). ASC 606 implements a common revenue standard that clarifies the principles for recognizing revenue. The core principle2016-13, “Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of ASC 606 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps: (1) identify the contract(s) with a customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract, (3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction priceCredit Losses on Financial Instruments,” and subsequent amendments to the ~~performance obligations~~initial guidance in November 2018, ASU No. 2018-19, April 2019, ASU 2019-04, May 2019, ASU 2019-05, November 2019, ASU 2019-11, February 2020, ASU 2020-02 and March 2020, ASU 2020-03, all of which clarifies codification and corrects unintended application of the ~~contract~~guidance. In November 2019, the FASB also issued ASU 2019-10, “Financial Instruments — Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and ~~(5) recognize revenue when (or as)~~Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates” extending the ~~entity satisfies a performance obligation. ASC 606 was~~adoption date for certain registrants, including the Corporation. These ASUs will be effective for ~~annual periods, and interim reporting periods within those annual periods,~~fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2017.~~2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Corporation ~~adopted ASC 606 on July 1, 2018 using~~is evaluating its current expected loss methodology of its loan and investment portfolios to identify the ~~modified retrospective approach. Therefore, the comparative information has not been adjusted~~necessary modifications in accordance with these standards and continues to be reported under superseded ASC 605. There was no cumulative effect adjustment as of July 1, 2018, and there were no material changes to the timing or amount of revenue recognized for the nine months ended March 31, 2019; however, additional disclosures were incorporatedexpects a change in the ~~footnotes~~processes and procedures to calculate the allowance for loan losses, including changes in assumptions and estimates to consider expected credit losses over the life of the loan versus the current accounting practice that utilizes the incurred loss model. A valuation adjustment to its allowance for loan losses or investment portfolio that is identified in this process will be reflected as a one-time adjustment in equity rather than earnings upon adoption. The ~~majority~~Corporation is in the process of ~~the Company's revenue is comprised of interest income from financial assets, which is explicitly excluded from the scope of ASC 606. The Corporation elected~~compiling historical data that will be used to ~~apply the practical expedient pursuant~~calculate expected credit losses on its loan portfolio to ~~ASC 606 and therefore does not disclose information about remaining performance obligations that have an original expected term of one year or less and allows~~ensure the Corporation ~~to expense costs related to obtaining a contract as incurred when~~is fully compliant with these ASUs at the ~~original amortization period would~~adoption date and is evaluating the potential impact adoption that these ASUs will have ~~been one year or less. See Note 12 for additional discussion.~~

on the Corporation’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2018-11

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, "Leases (Topic 842).," and a subsequent amendment to the initial guidance in February 2020, ASU 2020-02. This ASU introduces a lessee model that brings most leases ononto the balance sheet and aligns many of the underlying principles of the new lessor model with those in the new revenue recognition standard, ~~ASC~~Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 606, Revenue From Contracts With Customers. The new leases standard represents a

wholesale change to lease accounting and ~~will most likely~~did not result in significant implementation challenges during the transition ~~period~~period. For leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election by class of underlying asset not to recognize lease assets and ~~beyond. This~~lease liabilities. If a lessee makes this election, it should recognize lease expense for such leases generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The effective date of this ASU ~~will be effective~~ for annual periods is beginning after December 15, 2018 (i.e., calendar periods beginning on January 1, 2019), and interim periods ~~therein, early adoption is permitted.~~therein. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases, Targeted Improvements, which allows entities the option of initially applying the new leases standard at the adoption date (such as January 1, 2019, for calendar year- end public business entities) and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. In January 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-01, Codification Improvements. The amendments in this update include the following items: (i) determining the fair value of the underlying asset by lessors that are not manufacturers or dealers; (ii) requiring cash received from lessors from sales-type and direct financing leases to be presented in the cash flow statement within investing activities; and (iii) clarifying interim disclosure requirements. The effective date and transition requirements for the first and second items of this ASU are effective for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2019 and early adoption is permitted. The effective date and transition requirements for the third item of this ASU are the same as ASU 2016-02. The Corporation ~~plans to adopt these ASUs on~~adopted the provisions of ASC 842 effective July 1, ~~2019. Management~~2019 utilizing the transition method allowed under ASU 2018-11 and will not restate comparative periods as well as electing to not separate non-lease components from lease components. The Corporation elected the package of practical expedients permitted under ASC 842's transition guidance, which allows the Corporation to carryforward its historical lease classifications and its assessment as to whether a contract is ~~currently assessing the impact~~or contains a lease. The Corporation also elected to not recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for leases with an initial term of ~~these ASUs on the Corporation's financial position and results of operations but does not believe that~~12 months or less. The adoption of ~~these ASUs will~~ASC 842 did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. See Note 10 for additional discussion.

ASU ~~2018-13~~2018-13:

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, ~~Disclosure~~“Disclosure Framework -– Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which modifies disclosure requirements on fair value measurements to improve their effectiveness.” The guidance permits entities to consider materiality when evaluating fair value measurement disclosures and, among other modifications, requires certain new disclosures related to Level 3 fair value measurements. ~~The~~This guidance will be effective for fiscal years beginning ~~January 1, 2020,~~after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The guidance only affects disclosures in the notes to the consolidated financial statements and will not otherwise affect the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

ASU 2020-04:

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Facilitation of the Effects of reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. This ASU applies to contracts, hedging relationships and other transactions that reference LIBOR or other rate references expected to be discontinued because of reference rate reform. The ASU permits an entity to make necessary modifications to eligible contracts or transactions without requiring contract remeasurement or reassessment of a previous accounting determination. This ASU is effective for all entities as of March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. The Corporation is in the process of compiling data on the impact of reference rate reform and has not determined the impact of the adoption of this ASU on its consolidated financial ~~position or results of operations.~~

statements.

Note 3: Earnings ~~(Loss)~~ Per Share

Basic earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share ~~("EPS"~~(“EPS”) excludes dilution and is computed by dividing income available to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that would then share in the earnings of the ~~entity.~~Corporation.

As of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, there were outstanding options to purchase ~~497,750~~554,500 shares and ~~529,000~~497,750 shares of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s common stock, respectively. Of those shares, as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, there were ~~497,750~~135,000 shares and ~~26,000~~497,750 shares, respectively, which were excluded from the diluted EPS computation as their effect was anti-dilutive. As of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, there were outstanding restricted stock awards of ~~9,000~~225,500 shares and ~~98,500~~9,000 shares, respectively. The outstanding restricted stock had a dilutive effect for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2020. There was no dilutive effect for the ~~quarter ended March 31, 2019 but they were dilutive for the~~ comparable quarter last ~~year.~~year; however, there was a dilutive effect in the first nine month of fiscal 2019.

The following table provides the basic and diluted EPS computations for the ~~quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.~~

For the Quarters Ended
March 31,

For the Nine Months Ended
March 31,

(In Thousands, Except Earnings Per Share) 2019 2018 2019 2018
Numerator:
   Net income (loss) – numerator for basic earnings per share
    and diluted earnings per share - available to common
    stockholders
$ (151 ) $ 1,733 $ 3,630 $ 731

Denominator:
   Denominator for basic earnings per share:
    Weighted-average shares 7,507 7,457 7,481 7,573

     Effect of dilutive shares:
Stock options — 97 60 111
Restricted stock — 62 14 53

Denominator for diluted earnings per share:
    Adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed
     conversions
7,507 7,616 7,555 7,737

Basic earnings (loss) per share $ (0.02 ) $ 0.23 $ 0.49 $ 0.10
Diluted earnings (loss) per share $ (0.02 ) $ 0.23 $ 0.48 $ 0.09

~~Note 4: Operating Segment Reports~~

The Corporation operates in two business segments: community banking through the Bank and mortgage banking through Provident Bank Mortgage ("PBM"), a division of the Bank. The Corporation expects to discontinue the operations of PBM by June 30, 2019. The Corporation estimates that it will incur costs of approximately $3.6 million to $4.0 million to complete the exit during the remainder of fiscal 2019, which amounts include costs for severance, retention, personnel, premises, occupancy, depreciation, and costs related to termination of data processing and other contractual arrangements. As of March 31, 2019, the total costs incurred for both the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~were approximately $1.6 million, comprised of~~respectively.

$1.5 million in salaries and employee benefits expenses, $81,000 in premises and occupancy expenses and $13,000 in equipment expenses. There were no costs incurred related to the exit prior to the quarter ended March 31, 2019.

	For the Quarter Ended March 31,					For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands, Except Earnings Per Share)	2020		2019			2020		2019
Numerator:
Net income (loss) – numerator for basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share - available to common stockholders	$	1,145	$	(151	)	$	6,105	$	3,630

Denominator:
Denominator for basic earnings per share:
Weighted-average shares		7,469		7,507			7,478		7,481

Effect of dilutive shares:
Stock options		71		—			87		60
Restricted stock		50		—			41		14

Denominator for diluted earnings per share:
Adjusted weighted-average shares and assumed conversions		7,590		7,507			7,606		7,555

Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.15	$	(0.02	)	$	0.82	$	0.49
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.15	$	(0.02	)	$	0.80	$	0.48

The following tables set forth condensed consolidated statements of operations and total assets for the Corporation's operating segments for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2019
(In Thousands)
Provident
Bank

Provident
Bank
Mortgage

Consolidated
Totals

Net interest income $ 9,431 $ 181 $ 9,612
Provision (recovery) for loan losses 74 (70 ) 4
Net interest income, after provision (recovery) for loan losses 9,357 251 9,608

Non-interest income:
     Loan servicing and other fees ⁽¹⁾
103 159 262
     Gain (loss) on sale of loans, net ⁽²⁾
(1 ) 1,720 1,719
     Deposit account fees 471 — 471
     Gain on sale and operations of real estate owned
        acquired in the settlement of loans, net
2 — 2
Card and processing fees 373 — 373
Other 223 2 225
          Total non-interest income 1,171 1,881 3,052

Non-interest expense:
     Salaries and employee benefits 5,002 4,290 9,292
     Premises and occupancy 847 439 1,286
     Operating and administrative expenses 1,314 1,108 2,422
          Total non-interest expense 7,163 5,837 13,000
Income (loss) before income taxes 3,365 (3,705 ) (340 )
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 907 (1,096 ) (189 )
Net income (loss) $ 2,458 $ (2,609 ) $ (151 )
Total assets, end of period $ 1,088,716 $ 30,679 $ 1,119,395

⁽¹⁾	~~Includes an inter-company charge of $2 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for originating loans held for investment.~~

⁽²⁾	~~Includes an inter-company charge of $17 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for servicing fees on loans sold on a servicing retained basis.~~

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Provident
Bank

Provident
Bank
Mortgage

Consolidated
Totals

Net interest income $ 8,750 $ 374 $ 9,124
Recovery from the allowance for loan losses (505 ) — (505 )
Net interest income, after recovery from the allowance for loan losses 9,255 374 9,629

Non-interest income:
     Loan servicing and other fees ⁽¹⁾
313 180 493
     Gain (loss) on sale of loans, net ⁽²⁾
(1 ) 3,598 3,597
     Deposit account fees 529 — 529
     Loss on sale and operations of real estate owned
        acquired in the settlement of loans, net
(19 ) — (19 )
     Card and processing fees 372 — 372
     Other 238 — 238
          Total non-interest income 1,432 3,778 5,210

Non-interest expense:
     Salaries and employee benefits 4,763 4,045 8,808
     Premises and occupancy 842 413 1,255
     Operating and administrative expenses 1,050 1,326 2,376
          Total non-interest expense 6,655 5,784 12,439
Income (loss) before income taxes 4,032 (1,632 ) 2,400
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 1,252 (585 ) 667
Net income (loss) $ 2,780 $ (1,047 ) $ 1,733
Total assets, end of period $ 1,086,437 $ 90,165 $ 1,176,602

⁽¹⁾	~~Includes an inter-company charge of $222 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for originating loans held for investment.~~

⁽²⁾	~~Includes an inter-company charge of $44 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for servicing fees on loans sold on a servicing retained basis.~~

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019
(In Thousands)
Provident
Bank

Provident
Bank
Mortgage

Consolidated
Totals

Net interest income $ 27,956 $ 844 $ 28,800
Provision (recovery) for loan losses (475 ) 25 (450 )
Net interest income, after provision (recovery) for loan losses 28,431 819 29,250

Non-interest income:
     Loan servicing and other fees ⁽¹⁾
87 776 863
     Gain on sale of loans, net ⁽²⁾
33 7,081 7,114
     Deposit account fees 1,485 — 1,485
     Loss on sale and operations of real estate owned
        acquired in the settlement of loans, net
(4 ) — (4 )
     Card and processing fees 1,163 — 1,163
     Other 573 2 575
          Total non-interest income 3,337 7,859 11,196

Non-interest expense:
     Salaries and employee benefits 14,138 10,615 24,753
     Premises and occupancy 2,652 1,253 3,905
     Operating and administrative expenses 3,307 3,614 6,921
          Total non-interest expense 20,097 15,482 35,579
Income (loss) before income taxes 11,671 (6,804 ) 4,867
Provision (benefit) for income taxes 3,249 (2,012 ) 1,237
Net income (loss) $ 8,422 $ (4,792 ) $ 3,630
Total assets, end of period $ 1,088,716 $ 30,679 $ 1,119,395

⁽¹⁾	~~Includes an inter-company charge of $428 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for originating loans held for investment.~~

⁽²⁾	~~Includes an inter-company charge of $37 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for servicing fees on loans sold on a servicing retained basis.~~

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Provident
Bank

Provident
Bank
Mortgage

Consolidated
Totals

Net interest income $ 25,517 $ 1,476 $ 26,993
Recovery from the allowance for loan losses (347 ) — (347 )
Net interest income, after recovery from the allowance for loan losses 25,864 1,476 27,340

Non-interest income:
     Loan servicing and other fees ⁽¹⁾
468 705 1,173
     Gain on sale of loans, net ⁽²⁾
21 12,740 12,761
     Deposit account fees 1,623 — 1,623
     Loss on sale and operations of real estate owned
        acquired in the settlement of loans, net
(81 ) — (81 )
     Card and processing fees 1,126 — 1,126
     Other 701 — 701
          Total non-interest income 3,858 13,445 17,303

Non-interest expense:
     Salaries and employee benefits 13,714 12,996 26,710
     Premises and occupancy 2,491 1,338 3,829
     Operating and administrative expenses ⁽³⁾
4,490 6,357 10,847
          Total non-interest expense 20,695 20,691 41,386
Income (loss) before income taxes 9,027 (5,770 ) 3,257
Provision (benefit) for income taxes ⁽⁴⁾
4,595 (2,069 ) 2,526
Net income (loss) $ 4,432 $ (3,701 ) $ 731
Total assets, end of period $ 1,086,437 $ 90,165 $ 1,176,602

⁽¹⁾	~~Includes an inter-company charge of $561 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for originating loans held for investment.~~

⁽²⁾	~~Includes an inter-company charge of $182 credited to PBM by the Bank during the period to compensate PBM for servicing fees on loans sold on a servicing retained basis.~~

⁽³⁾	~~Includes~~ ~~$3.4 million~~ ~~of litigation settlement expense for the first nine months of fiscal 2018, of which~~ ~~$2.1 million~~ ~~was allocated to PBM.~~

⁽⁴⁾	~~Includes a net tax charge of $1.9 million resulting from the revaluation of net deferred tax assets consistent with the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act for the nine months ended December 31, 2017.~~

Note 5:4: Investment Securities

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018~~2019 were as follows:

March 31, 2019
Amortized
Cost

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
(Losses)

Estimated
Fair
Value

Carrying
Value

(In Thousands)
Held to maturity:
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS ⁽¹⁾
$ 99,193 $ 728 $ (163 ) $ 99,758 $ 99,193
U.S. SBA securities ⁽²⁾
2,917 — (19 ) 2,898 2,917
Certificate of deposits 400 — — 400 400
Total investment securities - held to maturity $ 102,510 $ 728 $ (182 ) $ 103,056 $ 102,510

Available for sale:
U.S. government agency MBS $ 3,677 $ 119 $ — $ 3,796 $ 3,796
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS 2,107 91 — 2,198 2,198
Private issue CMO ⁽³⁾
296 4 — 300 300
Total investment securities - available for sale $ 6,080 $ 214 $ — $ 6,294 $ 6,294
Total investment securities $ 108,590 $ 942 $ (182 ) $ 109,350 $ 108,804

March 31, 2020	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value
(In Thousands)
Held to maturity:
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS ⁽¹⁾	$	66,599	$	2,016	$	(88	)	$	68,527	$	66,599
U.S. SBA securities ⁽²⁾		2,083		—		(11	)		2,072		2,083
Certificate of deposits		800		—		—			800		800
Total investment securities - held to maturity	$	69,482	$	2,016	$	(99	)	$	71,399	$	69,482

Available for sale:
U.S. government agency MBS	$	2,913	$	88	$	—		$	3,001	$	3,001
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS		1,614		16		—			1,630		1,630
Private issue CMO ⁽³⁾		219		—		(22	)		197		197
Total investment securities - available for sale	$	4,746	$	104	$	(22	)	$	4,828	$	4,828
Total investment securities	$	74,228	$	2,120	$	(121	)	$	76,227	$	74,310

⁽¹⁾	Mortgage-Backed Securities ~~("MBS"~~(“MBS”).

⁽²⁾	Small Business Administration ~~("SBA"~~(“SBA”).

⁽³⁾	Collateralized Mortgage Obligations ~~("CMO"~~(“CMO”).

June 30, 2019	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized (Losses)			Estimated Fair Value		Carrying Value
(In Thousands)
Held to maturity
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS	$	90,394	$	1,289	$	(14	)	$	91,669	$	90,394
U.S. SBA securities		2,896		—		(6	)		2,890		2,896
Certificate of deposits		800		—		—			800		800
Total investment securities - held to maturity	$	94,090	$	1,289	$	(20	)	$	95,359	$	94,090

Available for sale
U.S. government agency MBS	$	3,498	$	116	$	(1	)	$	3,613	$	3,613
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS		1,998		89		—			2,087		2,087
Private issue CMO		261		8		—			269		269
Total investment securities - available for sale	$	5,757	$	213	$	(1	)	$	5,969	$	5,969
Total investment securities	$	99,847	$	1,502	$	(21	)	$	101,328	$	100,059

June 30, 2018
Amortized
Cost

Gross
Unrealized
Gains

Gross
Unrealized
(Losses)

Estimated
Fair
Value

Carrying
Value

(In Thousands)
Held to maturity:
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS $ 84,227 $ 203 $ (762 ) $ 83,668 $ 84,227
U.S. SBA securities 2,986 — (15 ) 2,971 2,986
Certificate of deposits 600 — — 600 600
Total investment securities - held to maturity $ 87,813 $ 203 $ (777 ) $ 87,239 $ 87,813

Available for sale:
U.S. government agency MBS $ 4,234 $ 150 $ — $ 4,384 $ 4,384
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS 2,640 122 — 2,762 2,762
Private issue CMO 346 4 — 350 350
Total investment securities - available for sale $ 7,220 $ 276 $ — $ 7,496 $ 7,496
Total investment securities $ 95,033 $ 479 $ (777 ) $ 94,735 $ 95,309

In the third ~~quarters~~quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Corporation received MBS principal payments of ~~$8.6~~$7.9 million and ~~$7.4~~$8.6 million, respectively, and there were no sales of investment securities during these periods. The Corporation ~~purchased~~did not purchase any investment securities in the third quarter of fiscal 2020, as compared to the purchase of $26.2 million of U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS ~~totaling $26.2 million and $12.4 million,~~ to be held to maturity ~~respectively.~~ in the same period of fiscal 2019.

For the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Corporation received MBS principal payments of ~~$25.2~~$25.3 million and ~~$19.1~~$25.2 million, respectively, and there were no sales of investment securities during these periods. InThe Corporation did not purchase

any investment securities in the first nine months of fiscal

~~2019 and 2018,~~ 2020, as compared to the ~~Corporation purchased~~purchase of $39.7 million of U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS ~~totaling $39.7 million and $50.9 million, to be held to maturity, respectively. In addition, the Corporation also purchased $3.0 million in U.S. SBA loan pool securities~~ to be held to maturity in the ~~third quarter and first nine months~~same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019.

The Corporation held investments with an unrealized loss position of ~~$182,000~~$121,000 at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~$777,000~~$21,000 at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

As of March 31, 2019	Unrealized Holding Losses						Unrealized Holding Losses						Unrealized Holding Losses
As of March 31, 2020																			Unrealized Holding Losses				Unrealized Holding Losses				Unrealized Holding Losses
(In Thousands)	Less Than 12 Months						12 Months or More						Total						Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
	Fair			Unrealized			Fair			Unrealized			Fair			Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Value			Losses			Value			Losses			Value			Losses			Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
Held to maturity:
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS		$	—		$	—		$	26,758		$	163		$	26,758		$	163	$	12,057	$	88	$	—	$	—	$	12,057	$	88
U.S. SBA securities			2,892			19			—			—			2,892			19		—		—		2,072		11		2,072		11
Total investment securities – held to maturity																			$	12,057	$	88	$	2,072	$	11	$	14,129	$	99

Available for sale
Private issue CMO																			$	197	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	197	$	22
Total investment securities – available for sale																			$	197	$	22	$	—	$	—	$	197	$	22
Total investment securities		$	2,892		$	19		$	26,758		$	163		$	29,650		$	182	$	12,254	$	110	$	2,072	$	11	$	14,326	$	121

As of June 30, 2018	Unrealized Holding Losses						Unrealized Holding Losses						Unrealized Holding Losses
As of June 30, 2019																			Unrealized Holding Losses				Unrealized Holding Losses				Unrealized Holding Losses
(In Thousands)	Less Than 12 Months						12 Months or More						Total						Less Than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
	Fair			Unrealized			Fair			Unrealized			Fair			Unrealized			Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized		Fair		Unrealized
Description of Securities	Value			Losses			Value			Losses			Value			Losses			Value		Losses		Value		Losses		Value		Losses
Held to maturity:
Held to maturity
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS		$	47,045		$	762		$	—		$	—		$	47,045		$	762	$	6,507	$	8	$	1,657	$	6	$	8,164	$	14
U.S. SBA securities			2,964			15			—			—			2,964			15		—		—		2,883		6		2,883		6
Total investment securities – held to maturity																			$	6,507	$	8	$	4,540	$	12	$	11,047	$	20

Available for sale
U.S. government agency MBS																			$	289	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	289	$	1
Total investment securities – available for sale																			$	289	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	289	$	1
Total investment securities		$	50,009		$	777		$	—		$	—		$	50,009		$	777	$	6,796	$	9	$	4,540	$	12	$	11,336	$	21

The Corporation evaluates individual investment securities quarterly for other-than-temporary declines in market value. At March 31, ~~2019, $163,000~~2020, $11,000 of the ~~$182,000~~$121,000 unrealized holding losses were 12 months or more; while at June 30, ~~2018, all~~2019, $12,000 of the $21,000 unrealized holding losses were ~~less than~~ 12 ~~months.~~months or more. The Corporation does not believe that there were any other-than-temporary impairments on the investment securities at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018;~~2019; therefore, no impairment losses were recorded for the ~~quarters and nine months~~quarter ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

Contractual maturities of investment securities as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018~~2019 were as follows:

	March 31, 2019				June 30, 2018				March 31, 2020				June 30, 2019
(In Thousands)	Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Estimated Fair Value

Held to maturity:
Due in one year or less	$	200	$	200	$	600	$	600	$	800	$	800	$	400	$	400
Due after one through five years		35,345		35,259		24,961		24,569		22,193		22,942		32,584		32,728
Due after five through ten years		38,691		39,126		22,847		22,477		28,121		29,378		35,306		36,090
Due after ten years		28,274		28,471		39,405		39,593		18,368		18,279		25,800		26,141
Total investment securities - held to maturity	$	102,510	$	103,056	$	87,813	$	87,239	$	69,482	$	71,399	$	94,090	$	95,359

Available for sale:
Due in one year or less	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Due after one through five years		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Due after five through ten years		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Due after ten years		6,080		6,294		7,220		7,496		4,746		4,828		5,757		5,969
Total investment securities - available for sale	$	6,080	$	6,294	$	7,220	$	7,496	$	4,746	$	4,828	$	5,757	$	5,969
Total investment securities	$	108,590	$	109,350	$	95,033	$	94,735	$	74,228	$	76,227	$	99,847	$	101,328

Note 6:5: Loans Held for Investment

Loans held for investment, net of fair value adjustments, consisted of the following:

(In Thousands)	March 31, 2019			June 30, 2018			March 31, 2020			June 30, 2019
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	$	314,824		$	314,808		$	326,686		$	324,952
Multi-family		449,812			476,008			475,941			439,041
Commercial real estate		115,355			109,726			105,691			111,928
Construction ⁽¹⁾		4,139			3,174			6,346			4,638
Other		167			167			—			167
Commercial business loans ⁽²⁾		483			500			502			478
Consumer loans ⁽³⁾		133			109			122			134
Total loans held for investment, gross		884,913			904,492			915,288			881,338

Advance payments of escrows		225			18			193			53
Deferred loan costs, net		5,496			5,560			6,636			5,610
Allowance for loan losses		(7,080	)		(7,385	)		(7,810	)		(7,076	)
Total loans held for investment, net	$	883,554		$	902,685		$	914,307		$	879,925

⁽¹⁾	Net of ~~$6.1~~$5.5 million and ~~$4.3~~$6.6 million of undisbursed loan funds as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively

⁽²⁾	Net of ~~$950~~$0.9 million and ~~$495~~$1.0 million of undisbursed lines of credit as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

⁽³⁾	Net of ~~$481~~$0.5 million and ~~$503~~$0.5 million of undisbursed lines of credit as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

1612

The following table sets forth information at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 regarding the dollar amount of loans held for investment that are contractually repricing during the periods indicated, segregated between adjustable rate loans and fixed rate loans. Fixed-rate loans comprised 2%one percent and two percent of loans held for investment at ~~both~~ March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018.~~2019, respectively. Adjustable rate loans having no stated repricing dates that reprice when the index they are tied to reprices (e.g. prime rate index) and checking account overdrafts are reported as repricing within one year. The table does not include any estimate of prepayments which may cause the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s actual repricing experience to differ materially from that shown.

	Adjustable Rate
(In Thousands)	Within One Year		After One Year Through 3 Years		After 3 Years Through 5 Years		After 5 Years Through 10 Years		Fixed Rate		Total
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	$	86,557	$	44,427	$	110,309	$	75,117	$	10,276	$	326,686
Multi-family		149,627		160,236		154,391		11,523		164		475,941
Commercial real estate		42,513		30,600		32,210		—		368		105,691
Construction		4,902		—		—		—		1,444		6,346
Commercial business loans		100		—		—		—		402		502
Consumer loans		122		—		—		—		—		122
Total loans held for investment, gross	$	283,821	$	235,263	$	296,910	$	86,640	$	12,654	$	915,288

Adjustable Rate
(In Thousands)
Within One
Year

After
One Year
Through 3
Years

After
3 Years
Through 5
Years

After
5 Years
Through 10
Years
Fixed Rate Total
Mortgage loans:
     Single-family $ 100,302 $ 37,514 $ 102,300 $ 62,493 $ 12,215 $ 314,824
     Multi-family 125,503 162,437 145,968 15,710 194 449,812
     Commercial real estate 44,247 33,136 36,442 1,055 475 115,355
     Construction 3,581 — — — 558 4,139
     Other — — — — 167 167
Commercial business loans 75 — — — 408 483
Consumer loans 133 — — — — 133
     Total loans held for investment,
       gross
$ 273,841 $ 233,087 $ 284,710 $ 79,258 $ 14,017 $ 884,913

The Corporation has developed an internal loan grading system to evaluate and quantify the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s loans held for investment portfolio with respect to quality and risk. Management continually evaluates the credit quality of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s loan portfolio and conducts a quarterly review of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses using quantitative and qualitative methods. The Corporation has adopted an internal risk rating policy in which each loan is rated for credit quality with a rating of pass, special mention, substandard, doubtful or loss. The two primary components that are used during the loan review process to determine the proper allowance levels are individually evaluated allowances and collectively evaluated allowances. Quantitative loan loss factors are developed by determining the historical loss experience, expected future cash flows, discount rates and collateral fair values, among others. Qualitative loan loss factors are developed by assessing general economic indicators such as gross domestic product, retail sales, unemployment rates, employment growth, California home sales and median California home prices. The Corporation assigns individual factors for the quantitative and qualitative methods for each loan category and each internal risk rating.

The Corporation categorizes all of the loans held for investment into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of the borrower to service their debt such as current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. A description of the general characteristics of the risk grades is as follows:

▪	Pass - These loans range from minimal credit risk to average, but still acceptable, credit risk. The likelihood of loss is considered remote.

▪	Special Mention - A special mention loan has potential weaknesses that may be temporary or, if left uncorrected, may result in a loss. While concerns exist, the bank is currently protected and loss is considered unlikely and not imminent.

▪

Substandard - A substandard loan is inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the borrower or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that may jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. A substandard loan is characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

▪	Doubtful - A doubtful loan has all of the weaknesses inherent in one classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of the currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.

▪	Loss - A loss loan is considered uncollectible and of such little value that continuance as an asset of the institution is not warranted.

The following tables summarize gross loans held for investment, net of fair value adjustments, by loan types and risk category at the dates indicated:

	March 31, 2019																	March 31, 2020
(In Thousands)		Single- family		Multi- family		Commercial Real Estate		Construction		Other Mortgage		Commercial Business		Consumer		Total		Single- family		Multi- family		Commercial Real Estate		Construction		Commercial Business		Consumer		Total

Pass		$	304,403	$	445,927	$	115,355	$	3,394	$	167	$	430	$	133	$	869,809	$	316,974	$	472,142	$	105,691	$	4,675	$	462	$	122	$	900,066
Special Mention			3,347		3,885		—		—		—		—		—		7,232		5,890		3,799		—		1,671		—		—		11,360
Substandard			7,074		—		—		745		—		53		—		7,872		3,822		—		—		—		40		—		3,862
Total loans held for investment, gross		$	314,824	$	449,812	$	115,355	$	4,139	$	167	$	483	$	133	$	884,913	$	326,686	$	475,941	$	105,691	$	6,346	$	502	$	122	$	915,288

June 30, 2018
(In Thousands)
Single-
family

Multi-
family

Commercial
Real Estate
Construction
Other
Mortgage

Commercial
Business
Consumer Total

Pass $ 304,619 $ 472,061 $ 108,786 $ 3,174 $ 167 $ 430 $ 109 $ 889,346
Special Mention 2,548 3,947 940 — — — — 7,435
Substandard 7,641 — — — — 70 — 7,711
Total loans held for
investment, gross
$ 314,808 $ 476,008 $ 109,726 $ 3,174 $ 167 $ 500 $ 109 $ 904,492

	June 30, 2019
(In Thousands)	Single- family		Multi- family		Commercial Real Estate		Construction		Other Mortgage		Commercial Business		Consumer		Total

Pass	$	314,036	$	435,177	$	111,001	$	3,667	$	167	$	429	$	134	$	864,611
Special Mention		3,795		3,864		927		—		—		—		—		8,586
Substandard		7,121		—		—		971		—		49		—		8,141
Total loans held for investment, gross	$	324,952	$	439,041	$	111,928	$	4,638	$	167	$	478	$	134	$	881,338

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level sufficient to provide for estimated losses based on evaluating known and inherent risks in the loans held for investment and upon ~~management's~~management’s continuing analysis of the factors underlying the quality of the loans held for investment. These factors include changes in the size and composition of the loans held for investment, actual loan loss experience, current economic conditions, detailed analysis of individual loans for which full collectability may not be assured, and determination of the realizable value of the collateral securing the loans. The provision (recovery) for (from) the allowance for loan losses is charged (credited) against operations on a quarterly basis, as necessary, to maintain the allowance at appropriate levels. Although management believes it uses the best information available to make such determinations, there can be no assurance that regulators, in reviewing the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s loans held for investment, will not request a significant increase in its allowance for loan losses. Future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected as a result of economic, operating, regulatory, and other conditions beyond the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s control. In response to the novel corona virus of 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic, which has negatively impacted the current economic environment, a qualitative component was established in the allowance for loan losses methodology.

Non-performing loans are charged-off to their fair market values in the period the loans, or portion thereof, are deemed uncollectible, generally after the loan becomes 150 days delinquent for real estate secured first trust deed loans and 120 days delinquent for commercial business or real estate secured second trust deed loans. For loans that were modified from their original terms, were re-underwritten and identified in the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s asset quality reports as troubled debt restructurings ("(“restructured ~~loans"~~loans”), the charge-off occurs when the loan becomes 90 days delinquent; and where borrowers file bankruptcy,

the charge-off occurs when the loan becomes 60 days delinquent. The amount of the charge-off is determined by comparing the loan balance to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral, less disposition costs, with the loan balance in excess of the estimated fair value charged-off against the allowance for loan losses. The allowance for loan losses for non-performing loans

is determined by applying ~~Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC")~~ASC 310, ~~"Receivables."~~“Receivables.” For restructured loans that are less than 90 days delinquent, the allowance for loan losses are segregated into (a) individually evaluated allowances for those loans with applicable discounted cash flow calculations still in their restructuring period, classified lower than pass, and containing an embedded loss component or (b) collectively evaluated allowances based on the aggregated pooling method. For non-performing loans less than 60 days delinquent where the borrower has filed bankruptcy, the collectively evaluated allowances are assigned based on the aggregated pooling method. For non-performing commercial real estate loans, an individually evaluated allowance is derived based on the loan's discounted cash flow fair value (for restructured loans) or collateral fair value less estimated selling costs and if the fair value is higher than the loan balance, no allowance is required.

The following table ~~summarizes the Corporation's allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2018:~~

(In Thousands) March 31, 2019 June 30, 2018
Collectively evaluated for impairment:
   Mortgage loans:
      Single-family $ 2,514 $ 2,632
      Multi-family 3,300 3,492
      Commercial real estate 1,042 1,030
      Construction 63 47
      Other 3 3
   Commercial business loans 18 18
   Consumer loans 8 6
      Total collectively evaluated allowance 6,948 7,228

Individually evaluated for impairment:
   Mortgage loans:
      Single-family 123 151
   Commercial business loans 9 6
      Total individually evaluated allowance 132 157
Total loan loss allowance $ 7,080 $ 7,385

~~The following table~~ is provided to disclose additional details for the periods indicated on the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s allowance for loan losses:

	For the Quarter Ended March 31,						For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in Thousands)	2020			2019			2020			2019

Allowance at beginning of period	$	6,921		$	7,061		$	7,076		$	7,385

Provision (recovery) for loan losses		874			4			671			(450	)

Recoveries:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family		14			22			63			177
Consumer loans		1			1			2			2
Total recoveries		15			23			65			179

Charge-offs:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family		—			(6	)		(1	)		(31	)
Consumer loans		—			(2	)		(1	)		(3	)
Total charge-offs		—			(8	)		(2	)		(34	)

Net recoveries (charge-offs)		15			15			63			145
Balance at end of period	$	7,810		$	7,080		$	7,810		$	7,080

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment at the end of the period		0.85	%		0.79	%		0.85	%		0.79	%
Net (recoveries) charge-offs as a percentage of average loans receivable, net, during the period (annualized)		(0.01	)%		(0.01	)%		(0.01	)%		(0.02	)%

For the Quarters Ended
March 31,

For the Nine Months Ended
March 31,

(Dollars in Thousands) 2019 2018 2019 2018

Allowance at beginning of period $ 7,061 $ 8,075 $ 7,385 $ 8,039

Provision (recovery) for loan losses 4 (505 ) (450 ) (347 )

Recoveries:
Mortgage loans:
      Single-family 22 71 177 203
Consumer loans 1 — 2 —
   Total recoveries 23 71 179 203

Charge-offs:
Mortgage loans:
      Single-family (6 ) (110 ) (31 ) (364 )
Consumer loans (2 ) — (3 ) —
   Total charge-offs (8 ) (110 ) (34 ) (364 )

   Net (charge-offs) recoveries 15 (39 ) 145 (161 )
      Balance at end of period $ 7,080 $ 7,531 $ 7,080 $ 7,531

Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross
loans held for investment at the end of the period
0.79 % 0.84 % 0.79 % 0.84 %
Net charge-offs (recoveries) as a percentage of average
loans receivable, net, during the period (annualized)
(0.01 )% 0.02 % (0.02 )% 0.02 %

The following tables denote the past due status of the Corporation's gross loans held for investment, net of fair value adjustments, at the dates indicated.

	March 31, 2020
(In Thousands)	Current		30-89 Days Past Due		Non-Accrual ⁽¹⁾		Total Loans Held for Investment, Gross

Mortgage loans:
Single-family	$	320,104	$	2,760	$	3,822	$	326,686
Multi-family		475,941		—		—		475,941
Commercial real estate		105,691		—		—		105,691
Construction		6,346		—		—		6,346
Commercial business loans		462		—		40		502
Consumer loans		118		4		—		122
Total loans held for investment, gross	$	908,662	$	2,764	$	3,862	$	915,288

March 31, 2019
(In Thousands) Current
30-89 Days
Past Due

Non-Accrual ⁽¹⁾

Total Loans Held for
Investment, Gross

Mortgage loans:
Single-family $ 308,554 $ 696 $ 5,574 $ 314,824
Multi-family 449,812 — — 449,812
Commercial real estate 115,355 — — 115,355
Construction 3,394 — 745 4,139
Other 167 — — 167
Commercial business loans 430 — 53 483
Consumer loans 130 3 — 133
Total loans held for investment, gross $ 877,842 $ 699 $ 6,372 $ 884,913

⁽¹⁾ All loans 90 days or greater past due are placed on non-accrual status.

	June 30, 2019
(In Thousands)	Current		30-89 Days Past Due		Non-Accrual⁽¹⁾		Total Loans Held for Investment, Gross

Mortgage loans:
Single-family	$	318,671	$	660	$	5,621	$	324,952
Multi-family		439,041		—		—		439,041
Commercial real estate		111,928		—		—		111,928
Construction		3,667		—		971		4,638
Other		167		—		—		167
Commercial business loans		429		—		49		478
Consumer loans		129		5		—		134
Total loans held for investment, gross	$	874,032	$	665	$	6,641	$	881,338

June 30, 2018
(In Thousands) Current
30-89 Days
Past Due

Non-Accrual ⁽¹⁾

Total Loans Held for
Investment, Gross

Mortgage loans:
Single-family $ 307,863 $ 804 $ 6,141 $ 314,808
Multi-family 476,008 — — 476,008
Commercial real estate 109,726 — — 109,726
Construction 3,174 — — 3,174
Other 167 — — 167
Commercial business loans 430 — 70 500
Consumer loans 108 1 — 109
Total loans held for investment, gross $ 897,476 $ 805 $ 6,211 $ 904,492

⁽¹⁾ All loans 90 days or greater past due are placed on non-accrual status.

The following tables summarize the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s allowance for loan losses and recorded investment in gross loans, by portfolio type, at the dates and for the periods indicated.

Quarter Ended March 31, 2019
(In Thousands)
Single-
family

Multi-
family

Commercial
Real Estate
Construction Other
Commercial
Business
Consumer Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance at beginning of period $ 2,679 $ 3,280 $ 1,019 $ 48 $ 3 $ 26 $ 6 $ 7,061
Provision (recovery) for loan losses (58 ) 20 23 15 — 1 3 4
Recoveries 22 — — — — — 1 23
Charge-offs (6 ) — — — — — (2 (8 )
   Allowance for loan losses,
    end of period
$ 2,637 $ 3,300 $ 1,042 $ 63 $ 3 $ 27 $ 8 $ 7,080

Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 123 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 9 $ — $ 132
Collectively evaluated for impairment 2,514 3,300 1,042 63 3 18 8 6,948
Allowance for loan losses,
    end of period
$ 2,637 $ 3,300 $ 1,042 $ 63 $ 3 $ 27 $ 8 $ 7,080

Loans held for investment:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 6,004 $ — $ — $ 745 $ — $ 53 $ — $ 6,802
Collectively evaluated for impairment 308,820 449,812 115,355 3,394 167 430 133 878,111
   Total loans held for investment,
    gross
$ 314,824 $ 449,812 $ 115,355 $ 4,139 $ 167 $ 483 $ 133 $ 884,913
   Allowance for loan losses as
   a percentage of gross loans
   held for investment
0.84 % 0.73 % 0.90 % 1.52 % 1.80 % 5.59 % 6.02 % 0.79 %

Quarter Ended March 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Single-
family

Multi-
family

Commercial
Real Estate
Construction Commercial Business Consumer Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance at beginning of period $ 3,303 $ 3,295 $ 933 $ 504 $ 32 $ 8 $ 8,075
Provision (recovery) for loan losses (143 ) 17 33 (410 ) (1 ) (1 ) (505 )
Recoveries 71 — — — — — 71
Charge-offs (110 ) — — — — — (110 )
   Allowance for loan losses,
    end of period
$ 3,121 $ 3,312 $ 966 $ 94 $ 31 $ 7 $ 7,531

Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 161 $ — $ — $ — $ 15 $ — $ 176
Collectively evaluated for impairment 2,960 3,312 966 94 16 7 7,355
   Allowance for loan losses,
    end of period
$ 3,121 $ 3,312 $ 966 $ 94 $ 31 $ 7 $ 7,531

Loans held for investment:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 7,929 $ — $ — $ — $ 73 $ — $ 8,002
Collectively evaluated for impairment 308,983 466,266 106,937 5,324 377 130 888,017
   Total loans held for investment,
    gross
$ 316,912 $ 466,266 $ 106,937 $ 5,324 $ 450 $ 130 $ 896,019
   Allowance for loan losses as
    a percentage of gross loans
    held for investment
0.98 % 0.71 % 0.90 % 1.77 % 6.89 % 5.38 % 0.84 %

	Quarter Ended March 31, 2020
(In Thousands)	Single- family			Multi- family			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Commercial Business			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance at beginning of period	$	2,157		$	3,502		$	1,058		$	168		$	28		$	8		$	6,921
Provision (recovery) for loan losses		431			456			3			(12	)		(2	)		(2	)		874
Recoveries		14			—			—			—			—			1			15
Charge-offs		—			—			—			—			—			—			—
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	2,602		$	3,958		$	1,061		$	156		$	26		$	7		$	7,810

Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	45		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	6		$	—		$	51
Collectively evaluated for impairment		2,557			3,958			1,061			156			20			7			7,759
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	2,602		$	3,958		$	1,061		$	156		$	26		$	7		$	7,810

Loans held for investment:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,698		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	40		$	—		$	2,738
Collectively evaluated for impairment		323,988			475,941			105,691			6,346			462			122			912,550
Total loans held for investment, gross	$	326,686		$	475,941		$	105,691		$	6,346		$	502		$	122		$	915,288
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment		0.80	%		0.83	%		1.00	%		2.46	%		5.18	%		5.74	%		0.85	%

2217

Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019
(In Thousands)
Single-
family

Multi-
family

Commercial
Real Estate
Construction Other Commercial Business Consumer Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance at beginning of period $ 2,783 $ 3,492 $ 1,030 $ 47 $ 3 $ 24 $ 6 $ 7,385
Provision (recovery) for loan losses (292 ) (192 ) 12 16 — 3 3 (450 )
Recoveries 177 — — — — — 2 179
Charge-offs (31 ) — — — — — (3 ) (34 )
   Allowance for loan losses,
    end of period
$ 2,637 $ 3,300 $ 1,042 $ 63 $ 3 $ 27 $ 8 $ 7,080

Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 123 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 9 $ — $ 132
Collectively evaluated for impairment 2,514 3,300 1,042 63 3 18 8 6,948
   Allowance for loan losses,
    end of period
$ 2,637 $ 3,300 $ 1,042 $ 63 $ 3 $ 27 $ 8 $ 7,080

Loans held for investment:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 6,004 $ — $ — $ 745 $ — $ 53 $ — $ 6,802
Collectively evaluated for impairment 308,820 449,812 115,355 3,394 167 430 133 878,111
   Total loans held for investment,
    gross
$ 314,824 $ 449,812 $ 115,355 $ 4,139 $ 167 $ 483 $ 133 $ 884,913
   Allowance for loan losses as
    a percentage of gross loans
    held for investment
0.84 % 0.73 % 0.90 % 1.52 % 1.80 % 5.59 % 6.02 % 0.79 %

	Quarter Ended March 31, 2019
(In Thousands)	Single- family			Multi- family			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Other			Commercial Business			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance at beginning of period	$	2,679		$	3,280		$	1,019		$	48		$	3		$	26		$	6		$	7,061
Provision (recovery) for loan losses		(58	)		20			23			15			—			1			3			4
Recoveries		22			—			—			—			—			—			1			23
Charge-offs		(6	)		—			—			—			—			—			(2	)		(8	)
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	2,637		$	3,300		$	1,042		$	63		$	3		$	27		$	8		$	7,080

Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	123		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	9		$	—		$	132
Collectively evaluated for impairment		2,514			3,300			1,042			63			3			18			8			6,948
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	2,637		$	3,300		$	1,042		$	63		$	3		$	27		$	8		$	7,080

Loans held for investment:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	6,004		$	—		$	—		$	745		$	—		$	53		$	—		$	6,802
Collectively evaluated for impairment		308,820			449,812			115,355			3,394			167			430			133			878,111
Total loans held for investment, gross	$	314,824		$	449,812		$	115,355		$	4,139		$	167		$	483		$	133		$	884,913
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment		0.84	%		0.73	%		0.90	%		1.52	%		1.80	%		5.59	%		6.02	%		0.79	%

Nine Months Ended March 31, 2018
(In Thousands)
Single-
family

Multi-
family

Commercial
Real Estate
Construction Commercial Business Consumer Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance at beginning of period $ 3,601 $ 3,420 $ 879 $ 96 $ 36 $ 7 $ 8,039
Provision (recovery) for loan losses (319 ) (108 ) 87 (2 ) (5 ) — (347 )
Recoveries 203 — — — — — 203
Charge-offs (364 ) — — — — — (364 )
   Allowance for loan losses,
    end of period
$ 3,121 $ 3,312 $ 966 $ 94 $ 31 $ 7 $ 7,531

Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 161 $ — $ — $ — $ 15 $ — $ 176
Collectively evaluated for impairment 2,960 3,312 966 94 16 7 7,355
   Allowance for loan losses,
    end of period
$ 3,121 $ 3,312 $ 966 $ 94 $ 31 $ 7 $ 7,531

Loans held for investment:
Individually evaluated for impairment $ 7,929 $ — $ — $ — $ 73 $ — $ 8,002
Collectively evaluated for impairment 308,983 466,266 106,937 5,324 377 130 888,017
   Total loans held for investment, gross $ 316,912 $ 466,266 $ 106,937 $ 5,324 $ 450 $ 130 $ 896,019
Allowance for loan losses as
  a percentage of gross loans
  held for investment
0.98 % 0.71 % 0.90 % 1.77 % 6.89 5.38 % 0.84

%

	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2020
(In Thousands)	Single- family			Multi- family			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Other			Commercial Business			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance at beginning of period	$	2,709		$	3,219		$	1,050		$	61		$	3		$	26		$	8		$	7,076
Provision (recovery) for loan losses		(169	)		739			11			95			(3	)		—			(2	)		671
Recoveries		63			—			—			—			—			—			2			65
Charge-offs		(1	)		—			—			—			—			—			(1	)		(2	)
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	2,602		$	3,958		$	1,061		$	156		$	—		$	26		$	7		$	7,810

Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	45		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	6		$	—		$	51
Collectively evaluated for impairment		2,557			3,958			1,061			156			—			20			7			7,759
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	2,602		$	3,958		$	1,061		$	156		$	—		$	26		$	7		$	7,810

Loans held for investment:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,698		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	40		$	—		$	2,738
Collectively evaluated for impairment		323,988			475,941			105,691			6,346			—			462			122			912,550
Total loans held for investment, gross	$	326,686		$	475,941		$	105,691		$	6,346		$	—		$	502		$	122		$	915,288
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment		0.80	%		0.8	%		1.00	%		2.46	%		—	%		5.18	%		5.74	%		0.85	%

	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019
(In Thousands)	Single- family			Multi- family			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Other			Commercial Business			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance at beginning of period	$	2,783		$	3,492		$	1,030		$	47		$	3		$	24		$	6		$	7,385
Provision (recovery) for loan losses		(292	)		(192	)		12			16			—			3			3			(450	)
Recoveries		177			—			—			—			—			—			2			179
Charge-offs		(31	)		—			—			—			—			—			(3	)		(34	)
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	2,637		$	3,300		$	1,042		$	63		$	3		$	27		$	8		$	7,080
															��
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	123		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	9		$	—		$	132
Collectively evaluated for impairment		2,514			3,300			1,042			63			3			18			8			6,948
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	2,637		$	3,300		$	1,042		$	63		$	3		$	27		$	8		$	7,080

Loans held for investment:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	6,004		$	—		$	—		$	745		$	—		$	53		$	—		$	6,802
Collectively evaluated for impairment		308,820			449,812			115,355			3,394			167			430			133			878,111
Total loans held for investment, gross	$	314,824		$	449,812		$	115,355		$	4,139		$	167		$	483		$	133		$	884,913
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment		0.84	%		0.73	%		0.90	%		1.52	%		1.80	%		5.59	%		6.02	%		0.79	%

The following tables identify the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s total recorded investment in non-performing loans by type at the dates and for the periods indicated. Generally, a loan is placed on non-accrual status when it becomes 90 days past due as to principal or interest or if the loan is deemed impaired, after considering economic and business conditions and collection efforts, where the ~~borrower's~~borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of the contractual principal or interest on the loan is doubtful. In addition, interest income is not recognized on any loan where management has determined that collection is not reasonably assured. A non-performing loan may be restored to accrual status when delinquent principal and interest payments are brought current, the borrower(s) has demonstrated sustained payment performance and future monthly principal and interest payments are expected to be collected on a timely basis. Loans with a related allowance reserve have been individually evaluated for impairment using either a discounted cash flow analysis or, for collateral dependent loans, current appraisals less costs to sell, to establish realizable value. This analysis may identify a specific impairment amount needed or may conclude that no reserve is needed. Loans that are not individually evaluated for impairment are included in pools of homogeneous loans for evaluation of related allowance reserves.

	At March 31, 2020
	Unpaid										Net
	Principal		Related			Recorded					Recorded
(In Thousands)	Balance		Charge-offs			Investment		Allowance ⁽¹⁾			Investment

Mortgage loans:
Single-family:
With a related allowance	$	1,802	$	—		$	1,802	$	(274	)	$	1,528
Without a related allowance ⁽²⁾		2,548		(475	)		2,073		—			2,073
Total single-family		4,350		(475	)		3,875		(274	)		3,601

Commercial business loans:
With a related allowance		40		—			40		(6	)		34
Total commercial business loans		40		—			40		(6	)		34

Total non-performing loans	$	4,390	$	(475	)	$	3,915	$	(280	)	$	3,635

At March 31, 2019
Unpaid Net
Principal Related Recorded Recorded
(In Thousands) Balance Charge-offs Investment
Allowance ⁽¹⁾
Investment

Mortgage loans:
   Single-family:
      With a related allowance $ 1,813 $ — $ 1,813 $ (284 ) $ 1,529
      Without a related allowance ⁽²⁾
4,336 (539 ) 3,797 — 3,797
   Total single-family 6,149 (539 ) 5,610 (284 ) 5,326

   Construction:
      Without a related allowance ⁽³⁾
745 — 745 — 745
   Total construction 745 — 745 — 745

Commercial business loans:
   With a related allowance 53 — 53 (9 ) 44
Total commercial business loans 53 — 53 (9 ) 44

Total non-performing loans $ 6,947 $ (539 ) $ 6,408 $ (293 ) $ 6,115

⁽¹⁾ Consists of collectively and individually evaluated allowances, specifically assigned to the individual loan, and fair value credit adjustments.

⁽²⁾ There was no related allowance for loan losses because the loans have been charged-off to their fair value or the fair value of the collateral is higher than the loan balance.

⁽³⁾ There was no related allowance for loan losses because the loans, net of undisbursed loan funds, have been charged-off to their fair value or the fair value of the collateral is higher than the net loan balance.

	At June 30, 2019
	Unpaid										Net
	Principal		Related			Recorded					Recorded
(In Thousands)	Balance		Charge-offs			Investment		Allowance ⁽¹⁾			Investment

Mortgage loans:
Single-family:
With a related allowance	$	2,640	$	—		$	2,640	$	(434	)	$	2,206
Without a related allowance ⁽²⁾		3,518		(518	)		3,000		—			3,000
Total single-family		6,158		(518	)		5,640		(434	)		5,206

Construction:
Without a related allowance ⁽²⁾		971		—			971		—			971
Total construction		971		—			971		—			971

Commercial business loans:
With a related allowance		49		—			49		(8	)		41
Total commercial business loans		49		—			49		(8	)		41

Total non-performing loans	$	7,178	$	(518	)	$	6,660	$	(442	)	$	6,218

At June 30, 2018
Unpaid Net
Principal Related Recorded Recorded
(In Thousands) Balance Charge-offs Investment
Allowance ⁽¹⁾
Investment

Mortgage loans:
   Single-family:
      With a related allowance $ 1,333 $ — $ 1,333 $ (185 ) $ 1,148
      Without a related allowance ⁽²⁾
5,569 (724 ) 4,845 — 4,845
   Total single-family 6,902 (724 ) 6,178 (185 ) 5,993

Commercial business loans:
   With a related allowance 70 — 70 (6 ) 64
Total commercial business loans 70 — 70 (6 ) 64

Total non-performing loans $ 6,972 $ (724 ) $ 6,248 $ (191 ) $ 6,057

⁽¹⁾ Consists of collectively and individually evaluated allowances, specifically assigned to the individual loan, and fair value credit adjustments.

⁽²⁾ There was no related allowance for loan losses because the loans have been charged-off to their fair value or the fair value of the collateral is higher than the loan balance.

At ~~both~~ March 31, ~~2019 and June 30, 2018,~~2020, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to those borrowers whose loans were classified as non-performing. At June 30, 2019, there was one non-performing ~~except for one~~ construction loan with undisbursed loan funds of ~~$1.2~~$1.0 million, ~~at March 31,~~which was subsequently upgraded to the special mention category in November 2019.

For the ~~quarters~~quarter ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s average recorded investment in non-performing loans was ~~$6.4~~$3.9 million and ~~$7.6~~$6.4 million, respectively. The Corporation records payments on non-performing loans utilizing the cash basis or cost recovery method of accounting during the periods when the loans are on non-performing status. For the quarter ended March 31, 2020, the Bank received $71,000 in interest payments from non-performing loans, of which $29,000 were recognized as interest income and the remaining $42,000 were applied to reduce the loan balances under the cost recovery method. In comparison, for the quarter ended March 31, 2019, the Bank received $63,000 in interest payments from non-performing loans, of which $30,000 were recognized as interest income and the remaining $33,000 were applied to reduce the loan balances under the cost recovery method. ~~In comparison for~~

For the ~~quarter~~nine months ended March 31, ~~2018,~~2020 and 2019, the Corporation’s average recorded investment in non-performing loans was $4.4 million and $6.7 million, respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2020, the Bank received ~~$121,000~~$275,000 in interest payments from non-performing loans, of which ~~$70,000~~$186,000 were recognized as interest income and the remaining ~~$51,000~~$89,000 were applied to reduce the loan balances under the cost recovery method.

~~For the nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the Corporation's average recorded investment in non-performing loans was $6.7 million and $8.1 million, respectively. For~~ In comparison, for the nine months ended March 31, 2019, the Bank received $458,000 in interest payments from non-performing loans, of which $321,000 were recognized as interest income and the remaining $137,000 were applied to reduce the loan balances under the cost recovery method. In comparison for the nine months ended March 31, 2018, the Bank received $466,000 in interest payments from non-performing loans, of which $240,000 were recognized as interest income and the remaining $226,000 were applied to reduce the loan balances under the cost recovery method.

The following tables present the average recorded investment in non-performing loans and the related interest income recognized for the ~~quarters~~quarter and nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

Quarter Ended March 31,
2019 2018
Average Interest Average Interest
Recorded Income Recorded Income
(In Thousands) Investment Recognized Investment Recognized

Without related allowances:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family $ 2,785 $ — $ 6,397 $ 49
Construction 745 — — —
3,530 — 6,397 49

With related allowances:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family 2,841 29 1,170 20
Commercial business loans 54 1 74 1
2,895 30 1,244 21

Total $ 6,425 $ 30 $ 7,641 $ 70

	Quarter Ended March 31,
	2020				2019
	Average		Interest		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income
(In Thousands)	Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized

Without related allowances:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	$	2,282	$	8	$	2,785	$	—
Construction		—		—		745		—
		2,282		8		3,530		—

With related allowances:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family		1,569		20		2,841		29
Commercial business loans		40		1		54		1
		1,609		21		2,895		30

Total	$	3,891	$	29	$	6,425	$	30

Nine Months Ended March 31,
2019 2018
Average Interest Average Interest
Recorded Income Recorded Income
(In Thousands) Investment Recognized Investment Recognized

Without related allowances:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family $ 3,570 $ 229 $ 7,296 $ 184
Commercial real estate — — 22 13
Construction 579 — — —
4,149 229 7,318 197

With related allowances:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family 2,466 89 738 39
Commercial business loans 61 3 76 4
2,527 92 814 43

Total $ 6,676 $ 321 $ 8,132 $ 240


	Nine Months Ended March 31,
	2020				2019
	Average		Interest		Average		Interest
	Recorded		Income		Recorded		Income
(In Thousands)	Investment		Recognized		Investment		Recognized

Without related allowances:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	$	2,747	$	119	$	3,570	$	229
Construction		361		20		579		—
		3,108		139		4,149		229

With related allowances:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family		1,291		44		2,466		89
Commercial business loans		43		3		61		3
		1,334		47		2,527		92

Total	$	4,442	$	186	$	6,676	$	321

For the quarter ended March 31, 2020, no new loans were restructured from their original terms and classified as restructured loans and no restructured loans were upgraded or downgraded. For the nine months ended March 31, 2020, no new loans were restructured from their original terms and classified as restructured loans, while two substandard restructured loans were paid

2723

off, one restructured loan was downgraded from pass to the substandard category and one restructured loan was upgraded from special mention to the pass category. For the quarter ended March 31, 2019, no new loans were restructured from their original terms and classified as restructured loans, while one restructured loan from the pass category was downgraded to special mention. For the nine months ended March 31, 2019, no new loans were restructured from their original terms and classified as restructured loans, while one restructured loan was upgraded to the pass category, one restructured loan from the pass category was downgraded to special mention and one restructured loan was paid off. ~~For~~During the ~~quarters~~quarter and nine months ended March 31, ~~2018, there were two loans totaling $2.2 million that were newly modified from their original terms~~2020 and ~~re-underwritten or identified in the Corporation's asset quality reports as restructured loans. During the quarters and nine months ended March 31,~~ 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ no restructured loans were in default within a 12-month period subsequent to their original restructuring. Additionally, during the quarter and nine months ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, there was no loan whose modification was extended beyond the initial maturity of the ~~modification; while during~~modification. During the nine months ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, there was one restructured loan with a loan balance of $56,000 whose modification was extended beyond the initial maturity of the modification. During the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2018, there were no loans whose modification was extended beyond the initial maturity of the modification.extended. At both March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, there were no commitments to lend additional funds to those borrowers whose loans were restructured.

As of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Corporation held 10six restructured loans with a net outstanding balance of ~~$4.6 million: one loan was classified as special mention ($440,000), one loan was classified as substandard and remains on accrual status ($1.4 million) and eight~~$1.8 million, all loans were classified as substandard and on non-accrual ~~status ($2.7 million).~~status. As of June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Corporation held 11eight restructured loans with a net outstanding balance of ~~$5.2~~$3.8 million: one loan was classified as special mention on accrual status ($~~389,000)~~437,000); one loan was classified as substandard on accrual status ($1.4 million); and ~~nine~~six loans were classified as substandard on non-accrual status ($~~3.4~~1.9 million). Substandard assets have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Corporation will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Assets that do not currently expose the Corporation to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification but possess weaknesses are designated as special mention and are closely monitored by the Corporation. As of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018, $2.9~~2019, $683,000 or 39%, and $2.4 million or 63%~~, and $2.9 million or 56%~~, respectively, of the restructured loans were current with respect to their modified payment terms.

The Corporation upgrades restructured single-family loans to the pass category if the borrower has demonstrated satisfactory contractual payments for at least six consecutive months; 12 months for those loans that were restructured more than once; and if the borrower has demonstrated satisfactory contractual payments beyond 12 consecutive months, the loan is no longer categorized as a restructured loan. In addition to the payment history described above, multi-family, commercial real estate, construction and commercial business loans must also demonstrate a combination of the following characteristics to be upgraded: satisfactory cash flow, satisfactory guarantor support, and additional collateral support, among others.

To qualify for restructuring, a borrower must provide evidence of their creditworthiness such as, current financial statements, their most recent income tax returns, current paystubs, current W-2s, and most recent bank statements, among other documents, which are then verified by the Corporation. The Corporation re-underwrites the loan with the ~~borrower's~~borrower’s updated financial information, new credit report, current loan balance, new interest rate, remaining loan term, updated property value and modified payment schedule, among other considerations, to determine if the borrower qualifies.

The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 signed into law on March 27, 2020 ("CARES Act") provided guidance around the modification of loans as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, which outlined, among other criteria, that short-term modifications made on a good faith basis to borrowers who were current as defined under the CARES Act prior to any relief, are not TDRs. This includes short-term (e.g. six months) modifications such as payment deferrals, fee waivers, extensions of repayment terms, or other delays in payment that are insignificant. Borrowers are considered current under the CARES Act if they are less than 30 days past due on their contractual payments at the time a modification program is implemented. At March 31, 2020 the Corporation had not made any short-term modifications as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The following table summarizes at the dates indicated the restructured loan balances, net of allowance for loan losses, by loan type and non-accrual versus accrual status:

	At		At
(In Thousands)	March 31, 2020		June 30, 2019
Restructured loans on non-accrual status:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	$	1,726	$	1,891
Commercial business loans		34		41
Total		1,760		1,932

Restructured loans on accrual status:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family		—		1,861
Total		—		1,861

Total restructured loans	$	1,760	$	3,793

At At
(In Thousands) March 31, 2019 June 30, 2018
Restructured loans on non-accrual status:
     Mortgage loans:
       Single-family $ 2,669 $ 3,328
     Commercial business loans 44 64
       Total 2,713 3,392

Restructured loans on accrual status:
     Mortgage loans:
       Single-family 1,865 1,788
       Total 1,865 1,788

       Total restructured loans $ 4,578 $ 5,180

The following tables identify the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s total recorded investment in restructured loans by type at the dates and for the periods indicated.

	At March 31, 2020
	Unpaid										Net
	Principal		Related			Recorded					Recorded
(In Thousands)	Balance		Charge-offs			Investment		Allowance ⁽¹⁾			Investment

Mortgage loans:
Single-family:
With a related allowance	$	677	$	—		$	677	$	(45	)	$	632
Without a related allowance ⁽²⁾		1,459		(365	)		1,094		—			1,094
Total single-family		2,136		(365	)		1,771		(45	)		1,726

Commercial business loans:
With a related allowance		40		—			40		(6	)		34
Total commercial business loans		40		—			40		(6	)		34

Total restructured loans	$	2,176	$	(365	)	$	1,811	$	(51	)	$	1,760

At March 31, 2019
Unpaid Net
Principal Related Recorded Recorded
(In Thousands) Balance Charge-offs Investment
Allowance ⁽¹⁾
Investment

Mortgage loans:
     Single-family:
       With a related allowance $ 2,207 $ — $ 2,207 $ (123 ) $ 2,084
       Without a related allowance ⁽²⁾
2,818 (368 ) 2,450 — 2,450
     Total single-family 5,025 (368 ) 4,657 (123 ) 4,534

Commercial business loans:
     With a related allowance 53 — 53 (9 ) 44
Total commercial business loans 53 — 53 (9 ) 44

Total restructured loans $ 5,078 $ (368 ) $ 4,710 $ (132 ) $ 4,578

⁽¹⁾ Consists of collectively and individually evaluated allowances, specifically assigned to the individual loan.

⁽²⁾ There was no related allowance for loan losses because the loans have been charged-off to their fair value or the fair value of the collateral is higher than the loan balance.

	At June 30, 2019
	Unpaid										Net
	Principal		Related			Recorded					Recorded
(In Thousands)	Balance		Charge-offs			Investment		Allowance⁽¹⁾			Investment

Mortgage loans:
Single-family:
With a related allowance	$	2,199	$	—		$	2,199	$	(122	)	$	2,077
Without a related allowance⁽²⁾		2,040		(365	)		1,675		—			1,675
Total single-family		4,239		(365	)		3,874		(122	)		3,752

Commercial business loans:
With a related allowance		49		—			49		(8	)		41
Total commercial business loans		49		—			49		(8	)		41

Total restructured loans	$	4,288	$	(365	)	$	3,923	$	(130	)	$	3,793

At June 30, 2018
Unpaid Net
Principal Related Recorded Recorded
(In Thousands) Balance Charge-offs Investment
Allowance ⁽¹⁾
Investment

Mortgage loans:
     Single-family
       With a related allowance $ 2,228 $ — $ 2,228 $ (151 ) $ 2,077
       Without a related allowance ⁽²⁾
3,450 (411 ) 3,039 — 3,039
     Total single-family 5,678 (411 ) 5,267 (151 ) 5,116

Commercial business loans:
     With a related allowance 70 — 70 (6 ) 64
Total commercial business loans 70 — 70 (6 ) 64

Total restructured loans $ 5,748 $ (411 ) $ 5,337 $ (157 ) $ 5,180

⁽¹⁾ Consists of collectively and individually evaluated allowances, specifically assigned to the individual loan.

⁽²⁾ There was no related allowance for loan losses because the loans have been charged-off to their fair value or the fair value of the collateral is higher than the loan balance.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, no properties were acquired in the settlement of loans and no previously foreclosed upon properties were sold. For the nine months ended March 31, 2020, no properties were acquired in the settlement of loans and no previously foreclosed upon properties were sold. This compares to the ~~quarter ended March 31, 2018 when two properties were acquired in the settlement of loans, and one previously foreclosed upon property was sold. For the~~ nine months ended March 31, 2019 when no ~~properties were~~property was acquired in the settlement of loans, while two previously foreclosed upon properties were sold. ~~This compares to the nine months ended March 31, 2018 when three properties were acquired in the settlement of loans, and three previously foreclosed upon properties were sold.~~ As of March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2019, there was no ~~outstanding~~ real estate owned ~~property. This compares to two real estate owned properties located in California with a total net fair value of $906,000~~property at ~~June 30, 2018.~~both dates. A new appraisal ~~was~~is obtained on each of the properties at the time of foreclosure and fair value ~~was~~is derived by using the lower of the appraised value or the listing price of the property, net of selling costs. Any initial loss ~~was~~is recorded as a charge to the allowance for loan losses before being transferred to real estate owned. Subsequent to transfer to real estate owned, if there is further deterioration in real estate values, specific real estate owned loss reserves are established and charged to the ~~statement~~condensed consolidated statements of operations. In addition, the Corporation records costs to carry real estate owned as real estate operating expenses as incurred.

Note 7:6: Derivative and Other Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risks

The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit in the form of originating loans or providing funds under existing lines of credit, loan sale commitments to third parties and option contracts. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s exposure to credit loss, in the event of non-performance by the counterparty to these financial instruments, is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in entering into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. As of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Corporation had commitments to extend credit ~~(on~~on loans to be held for investment ~~and loans to be held for sale)~~ of ~~$16.6~~$3.4 million and ~~$66.3~~$4.3 million, respectively.

The following table provides information at the dates indicated regarding undisbursed funds on construction loans, undisbursed funds to borrowers on existing lines of credit with the Corporation as well as commitments to originate loans to be held for investment at the dates indicated below.

Commitments	March 31, 2020		June 30, 2019
(In Thousands)

Undisbursed loan funds – Construction loans	$	5,485	$	6,592
Undisbursed lines of credit – Commercial business loans		920		1,003
Undisbursed lines of credit – Consumer loans		463		479
Commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for investment		3,353		4,254
Total	$	10,221	$	12,328

Commitments March 31, 2019 June 30, 2018
(In Thousands)

Undisbursed loan funds – Construction loans $ 6,109 $ 4,302
Undisbursed lines of credit – Commercial business loans 950 495
Undisbursed lines of credit – Consumer loans 481 503
Commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for investment 4,346 9,352
Total $ 11,886 $ 14,652

The following table provides information regarding the allowance for loan losses for the undisbursed funds and commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for investment for the ~~quarters~~quarter and nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

	For the Quarter Ended March 31,					For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)	2020			2019		2020			2019
Balance, beginning of the period	$	138		$	150	$	141		$	157
Provision (recovery)		(47	)		1		(50	)		(6	)
Balance, end of the period	$	91		$	151	$	91		$	151

For the Quarters Ended
March 31,

For the Nine Months Ended
March 31,

(In Thousands) 2019 2018 2019 2018
Balance, beginning of the period $ 150 $ 188 $ 157 $ 277
Provision (recovery) 1 (29 ) (6 ) (118 )
Balance, end of the period $ 151 $ 159 $ 151 $ 159

In accordance with ASC 815, ~~"Derivatives~~“Derivatives and Hedging,"” and interpretations of the Derivatives Implementation Group of the FASB, the fair value of the commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale, loan sale commitments, to be announced ~~("TBA"~~(“TBA”) MBS trades, put option contracts and call option contracts are recorded at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. At March 31, 2019, $240,000 was included in other assets and $224,000 was included in other liabilities; at June 30, 2018, $849,000 was included in other assets and $464,000 was included in other liabilities. The Corporation does not apply hedge accounting to its derivative financial instruments; therefore, all changes in fair value are recorded in earnings. As of March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2019, there were no outstanding derivative financial instruments.

The net impact of derivative financial instruments recorded within the gain on sale of loans contained in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations during the ~~quarters~~quarter and nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019 was as follows:

	For the Quarter Ended March 31,					For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
Derivative Financial Instruments	2020		2019			2020		2019
(In Thousands)
Commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale	$	—	$	(264	)	$	—	$	(585	)
Mandatory loan sale commitments and TBAMBS trades		—		465			—		216
Total net loss	$	—	$	201		$	—	$	(369	)

For the Quarters Ended
March 31,

For the Nine Months Ended
March 31,

Derivative Financial Instruments 2019 2018 2019 2018
(In Thousands)
Commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale $ (264 ) $ 266 $ (585 ) $ 173
Mandatory loan sale commitments and TBAMBS trades
465 (281 ) 216 (1,072 )
Option contracts, net — — — (37 )
Total net gain (loss) $ 201 $ (15 ) $ (369 ) $ (936 )

Loans previously sold to the FHLB – San Francisco under the Mortgage Partnership Finance (“MPF”) program have a recourse liability. The FHLB – San Francisco absorbs the first four basis points of loss by establishing a first loss account and a credit scoring process is used to calculate the maximum recourse amount for the Bank. All losses above the Bank’s maximum recourse amount are the responsibility of the FHLB – San Francisco. The FHLB – San Francisco pays the Bank a credit enhancement fee on a monthly basis to compensate the Bank for accepting the recourse obligation. As of March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2019, the Bank serviced $7.9 million and $9.7 million of loans under this program, respectively and has established a recourse liability of $50,000 at both dates.

~~The outstanding derivative financial instruments and other loan sale agreements at the dates indicated were as follows:~~

March 31, 2019 June 30, 2018
Derivative Financial Instruments Amount
Fair
Value
Amount
Fair
Value

(In Thousands)
Commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale ⁽¹⁾
$ 12,211 $ 240 $ 56,906 $ 825
Best efforts loan sale commitments (10,212 ) — (29,502 ) —
Mandatory loan sale commitments and TBA MBS trades (28,817 ) (224 ) (117,759 ) (440 )
Total $ (26,818 ) $ 16 $ (90,355 ) $ 385

⁽¹⁾	~~Net of 18.6% at March 31, 2019 and 24.7% at June 30, 2018 of commitments which management has estimated may not fund.~~

Occasionally, the ~~Corporation~~Bank is required to repurchase loans sold to Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae or other ~~institutional~~ investors if it is determined that such loans do not meet the credit requirements of the investor, or if one of the parties involved in the loan misrepresented pertinent facts, committed fraud, or if such loans were 90-days past due within 120 days of the loan funding date. During the ~~third~~ quarter ~~of fiscal 2019,~~ended March 31, 2020, the ~~Corporation~~Bank did not repurchase any loans. In comparison during the same quarter last year, the Bank repurchased two loans totaling $446,000 pursuant to the recourse/repurchase covenants contained in the loan sale agreements. During the first nine months of fiscal 2020, the Bank repurchased three loans totaling $1.1 million. In comparison ~~the Corporation repurchased two loans totaling $602,000 from investors~~ during ~~the third quarter of fiscal 2018. During~~ the first nine months of fiscal 2019, the ~~Corporation~~Bank repurchased five loans totaling $699,000, including two loans totaling $25,000 that were fully charged ~~off ($25,000). In comparison, the Corporation repurchased two loans totaling $602,000 from investors during the first nine months of fiscal 2018. Additional~~off. There were no other repurchase requests ~~may have been settled~~ that did not result in the repurchase of the loan ~~itself. The primary reasons for honoring~~itself, which were settled in the ~~repurchase requests are borrower fraud, undisclosed liabilities on borrower applications,~~quarter and ~~documentation, verification~~nine months ended March 31, 2020 and ~~appraisal disputes. For~~2019. In addition to the ~~third quarters of fiscal 2019 and 2018, the Corporation did not record any provision~~specific recourse liability for the MPF program, the Bank established a recourse liability ~~and did not settle any claims. For the first nine months~~ of fiscal 2019 and 2018, the Corporation recorded a $33,000 recovery and a $22,000 recovery from the recourse liability, respectively, and did not settle any claims. As of March 31, 2019, the total recourse reserve$200,000 for loans sold ~~that are subject~~ to ~~repurchase decreased to $250,000,~~other investors as ~~compared to $283,000 at~~of both March 31, 2020 and June 30, ~~2018 and $283,000 at March 31, 2018.~~

Beginning in 2008, in connection with the downturn in the real estate market, the Corporation implemented tighter underwriting standards to reduce potential loan repurchase requests, including requiring higher credit scores, generally lower debt-to-income ratios, and verification of income and assets, among other criteria. Despite management's diligent estimate of the recourse reserve, the Corporation is still subject to risks and uncertainties associated with potentially higher loan repurchase claims from investors, and there are no assurances that the current recourse reserve will be sufficient to cover all future recourse claims.2019.

The following table shows the summary of the recourse liability for the ~~quarters~~quarter and nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

	For the Quarter Ended March 31,				For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
Recourse Liability	2020		2019		2020		2019
(In Thousands)

Balance, beginning of the period	$	250	$	250	$	250	$	283
Provision (recovery) from recourse liability		—		—		—		(33	)
Net settlements in lieu of loan repurchases		—		—		—		—
Balance, end of the period	$	250	$	250	$	250	$	250

For the Quarters Ended
March 31,

For the Nine Months Ended
March 31,

Recourse Liability 2019 2018 2019 2018
(In Thousands)

Balance, beginning of the period $ 250 $ 283 $ 283 $ 305
Recovery from recourse liability — — (33 ) (22 )
Net settlements in lieu of loan repurchases — — — —
Balance, end of the period $ 250 $ 283 $ 250 $ 283

Note 8:7: Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Corporation adopted ASC 820, ~~"Fair~~“Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,"” and elected the fair value option pursuant to ASC 825, ~~"Financial Instruments"~~“Financial Instruments” on loans originated for ~~sale by PBM.~~sale. ASC 820 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 825 permits entities to elect to measure many financial instruments and certain other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis (the ~~"Fair~~“Fair Value ~~Option"~~Option”) at specified election dates. At each subsequent reporting date, an entity is required to report unrealized gains and losses on items in earnings for which the fair value option has been elected. The objective of the Fair Value Option is to improve financial reporting by providing entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.

The following table describes the difference at the dates indicated between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate unpaid principal balance of loans held for investment at fair ~~value and loans held for sale at fair~~ value:

(In Thousands)	Aggregate Fair Value		Aggregate Unpaid Principal Balance		Net Unrealized Loss
As of March 31, 2020:
Loans held for investment, at fair value	$	3,835	$	3,971	$	(136	)

As of June 30, 2019:
Loans held for investment, at fair value	$	5,094	$	5,218	$	(124	)

(In Thousands)
Aggregate
Fair Value

Aggregate
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

Net
Unrealized
Gain (Loss)

As of March 31, 2019:
Loans held for investment, at fair value $ 5,239 $ 5,417 $ (178 )
Loans held for sale, at fair value $ 30,500 $ 29,565 $ 935

As of June 30, 2018:
Loans held for investment, at fair value $ 5,234 $ 5,546 $ (312 )
Loans held for sale, at fair value $ 96,298 $ 93,791 $ 2,507

ASC 820-10-65-4, ~~"Determining~~“Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,"” provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with ASC 820, ~~"Fair~~“Fair Value Measurements,"” when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased.

ASC 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. The three levels of inputs are defined as follows:

Level 1	-	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Corporation has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2	-	Observable inputs other than Level 1 such as: quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated to observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3	-	Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability that use significant assumptions, including assumptions of risks. These unobservable assumptions reflect the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s estimate of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Valuation techniques include the use of pricing models, discounted cash flow models and similar techniques.

ASC 820 requires the Corporation to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value calculation.

The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of investment securities available for sale, loans held for investment at fair value, ~~loans held for sale at fair value,~~ interest-only strips and derivative

financial instruments; while non-performing loans, mortgage servicing assets ("MSA") and real estate owned are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

Investment securities - available for sale are primarily comprised of U.S. government agency MBS, U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS and privately issued CMO. The Corporation utilizes quoted prices in active markets for similar securities for its fair value measurement of MBS (Level 2) and broker price indications for similar securities in non-active markets for its fair value measurement of the CMO (Level 3).

Derivative financial instruments are comprised of commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale, mandatory loan sale commitments, TBA MBS trades and option contracts. The fair value of TBA MBS trades is determined using quoted secondary-market prices (Level 2). The fair values of other derivative financial instruments are determined by quoted prices for a similar commitment or commitments, adjusted for the specific attributes of each commitment (Level 3).

Loans held for investment at fair value are primarily single-family loans which have been transferred from loans held for sale. The fair value is determined by the management estimates of the specific credit risk attributes of each loan, in addition to the quoted secondary-market prices which account for the interest rate characteristics of each loan (Level 3).

Loans held for sale at fair value are primarily single-family loans. The fair value is determined, when possible, using quoted secondary-market prices such as mandatory loan sale commitments. If no such quoted price exists, the fair value of a loan is determined by quoted prices for a similar loan or loans, adjusted for the specific attributes of each loan (Level 2).

Non-performing loans are loans which are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the borrowers or of the collateral pledged. The non-performing loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Corporation will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. The fair value of a non-performing loan is determined based on an observable market price or current appraised value of the underlying collateral. Appraised and reported values may be discounted based on ~~management's~~management’s historical knowledge, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation, and/or ~~management's~~management’s expertise and knowledge of the borrower. For non-performing loans which are restructured loans, the fair value is derived from discounted cash flow analysis (Level 3), except those which are in the process of foreclosure or 90 days delinquent for which the fair value is derived from the appraised value of its collateral (Level 2). For other non-performing loans which are not restructured loans, other than non-performing commercial real estate loans, the fair value is derived from relative value analysis: historical experience and management estimates by loan type for which collectively evaluated allowances are assigned (Level 3); or the appraised value of its collateral for loans which are in the process of foreclosure or where borrowers file bankruptcy (Level 2). For non-performing commercial real estate loans, the fair value is derived from the appraised value of its collateral (Level 2). Non-performing loans are reviewed and evaluated on at least a quarterly basis for additional allowance and adjusted accordingly, based on the same factors identified above. This loss is not recorded directly as an adjustment to current earnings or other comprehensive income (loss), but rather as a component in determining the overall adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. These adjustments to the estimated fair value of non-performing loans may result in increases or decreases to the provision for loan losses recorded in current earnings.

The Corporation uses the amortization method for its MSA, which amortizes the MSA in proportion to and over the period of estimated net servicing income and assesses the MSA for impairment based on fair value at each reporting date. The fair value of the MSA is derived using the present value method; which includes a third ~~party's~~party’s prepayment projections of similar instruments, weighted-average coupon rates, estimated servicing costs and discount interest rates (Level 3).

The rights to future income from serviced loans that exceed contractually specified servicing fees are recorded as interest-only strips. The fair value of interest-only strips is derived using the same assumptions that are used to value the related MSA (Level 3).

The fair value of real estate owned is derived from the lower of the appraised value or the listing price, net of estimated selling costs (Level 2).

The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. While management believes the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

The following fair value hierarchy tables present information at the dates indicated about the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

	Fair Value Measurement at March 31, 2020 Using:
(In Thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Investment securities - available for sale:
U.S. government agency MBS	$	—	$	3,001	$	—	$	3,001
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS	—		1,630		—		1,630
Private issue CMO	—		—		197		197
Investment securities - available for sale	—		4,631		197		4,828

Loans held for investment, at fair value	—		—		3,835		3,835
Interest-only strips	—		—		13		13
Total assets	$	—	$	4,631	$	4,045	$	8,676

Liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Total liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

Fair Value Measurement at March 31, 2019 Using:
(In Thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:
     Investment securities - available for sale:
         U.S. government agency MBS $ — $ 3,796 $ — $ 3,796
         U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS — 2,198 — 2,198
         Private issue CMO — — 300 300
             Investment securities - available for sale — 5,994 300 6,294

     Loans held for investment, at fair value — — 5,239 5,239
     Loans held for sale, at fair value — 30,500 — 30,500
     Interest-only strips — — 18 18

     Derivative assets:
         Commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale — — 240 240
             Derivative assets — — 240 240
Total assets $ — $ 36,494 $ 5,797 $ 42,291

Liabilities:
         Derivative liabilities:
         Mandatory loan sale commitments $ — $ — $ 7 $ 7
         TBA MBS trades — 217 — 217
             Derivative liabilities — 217 7 224
Total liabilities $ — $ 217 $ 7 $ 224

Fair Value Measurement at June 30, 2018 Using:
(In Thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:
     Investment securities - available for sale:
         U.S. government agency MBS $ — $ 4,384 $ — $ 4,384
         U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS — 2,762 — 2,762
         Private issue CMO — — 350 350
             Investment securities - available for sale — 7,146 350 7,496

     Loans held for investment, at fair value — — 5,234 5,234
     Loans held for sale, at fair value — 96,298 — 96,298
     Interest-only strips — — 23 23

     Derivative assets:
         Commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale — — 849 849
             Derivative assets — — 849 849
Total assets $ — $ 103,444 $ 6,456 $ 109,900

Liabilities:
     Derivative liabilities:
         Commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale $ — $ — $ 24 $ 24
         Mandatory loan sale commitments — — 32 32
         TBA MBS trades — 408 — 408
             Derivative liabilities — 408 56 464
Total liabilities $ — $ 408 $ 56 $ 464

	Fair Value Measurement at June 30, 2019 Using:
(In Thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Investment securities - available for sale:
U.S. government agency MBS	$	—	$	3,613	$	—	$	3,613
U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS	—		2,087		—		2,087
Private issue CMO	—		—		269		269
Investment securities - available for sale	—		5,700		269		5,969

Loans held for investment, at fair value	—		—		5,094		5,094
Interest-only strips	—		—		16		16
Total assets	$	—	$	5,700	$	5,379	$	11,079

Liabilities:	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Total liabilities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—

The following tables summarize reconciliations of the beginning and ending balances during the periods shown of recurring fair value measurements recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition using Level 3 inputs:

	For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2020
	Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Other Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(In Thousands)	Private Issue CMO		Loans Held For Investment, at fair value ⁽¹⁾				Interest- Only Strips		Total
Beginning balance at December 31, 2019	$	231		$	4,173		$	13	$	4,417
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings		—			(25	)		—		(25	)
Included in other comprehensive loss		(26	)		—			—		(26	)
Purchases		—			—			—		—
Issuances		—			—			—		—
Settlements		(8	)		(313	)		—		(321	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—			—			—		—
Ending balance at March 31, 2020	$	197		$	3,835		$	13	$	4,045

⁽¹⁾	The valuation of loans held for investment at fair value includes management estimates of the specific credit risk attributes of each loan, in addition to the quoted secondary-market prices which account for the interest rate characteristics of each loan.

	For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2019
	Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Other Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(In Thousands)	Private Issue CMO			Loans Held For Investment, at fair value ⁽¹⁾			Interest- Only Strips			Loan Commitments to Originate ⁽²⁾			Mandatory Commitments ⁽³⁾			Total
Beginning balance at December 31, 2018	$	310		$	4,995		$	21		$	504		$	(9	)	$	5,821
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings		—			87			—			(264	)		(3	)		(180	)
Included in other comprehensive loss		1			—			(3	)		—			—			(2	)
Purchases		—			—			—			—			—			—
Issuances		—			—			—			—			—			—
Settlements		(11	)		(34	)		—			—			5			(40	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—			191			—			—			—			191
Ending balance at March 31, 2019	$	300		$	5,239		$	18		$	240		$	(7	)	$	5,790

⁽¹⁾	The valuation of loans held for investment at fair value includes the management estimates of the specific credit risk attributes of each loan, in addition to the quoted secondary-market prices which account for the interest rate characteristics of each loan.

⁽²⁾	Consists of commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale.

⁽³⁾	Consists of mandatory loan sale commitments.

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2018

Fair Value Measurement
Using Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)

(In Thousands)
Private
Issue
CMO

Loans Held
For
Investment, at
fair value ⁽¹⁾

Interest-
Only
Strips

Loan
Commit-
ments to
Originate ⁽²⁾

Manda-
tory
Commit-
ments ⁽³⁾
Total
Beginning balance at December 31, 2017 $ 419 $ 5,157 $ 26 $ 716 $ (24 ) $ 6,294
     Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
         Included in earnings — (118 ) — 266 (26 ) 122
         Included in other comprehensive loss (2 ) — (2 ) — — (4 )
     Purchases — — — — — —
     Issuances — — — — — —
     Settlements (22 ) (43 ) — — — (65 )
     Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 — — — — — —
Ending balance at March 31, 2018 $ 395 $ 4,996 $ 24 $ 982 $ (50 ) $ 6,347
32

	For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2020
	Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Other Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(In Thousands)	Private Issue CMO			Loans Held For Investment, at fair value ⁽¹⁾				Interest- Only Strips			Total
Beginning balance at June 30, 2019	$	269			$	5,094		$	16		$	5,379
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings		—				(12	)		—			(12	)
Included in other comprehensive loss		(29	)			—			(3	)		(32	)
Purchases		—				—			—			—
Issuances		—				—			—			—
Settlements		(43	)			(1,247	)		—			(1,290	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—				—			—			—
Ending balance at March 31, 2020	$	197			$	3,835		$	13		$	4,045

⁽¹⁾	The valuation of loans held for investment at fair value includes ~~the~~ management estimates of the specific credit risk attributes of each loan, in addition to the quoted secondary-market prices which account for the interest rate characteristics of each loan.

⁽²⁾	~~Consists of commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale.~~

⁽³⁾	~~Consists of mandatory loan sale commitments.~~

	For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019
	Fair Value Measurement Using Significant Other Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
(In Thousands)	Private Issue CMO			Loans Held For Investment, at fair value ⁽¹⁾			Interest- Only Strips			Loan Commitments to Originate ⁽²⁾			Mandatory Commitments ⁽³⁾			Total
Beginning balance at June 30, 2018	$	350		$	5,234		$	23		$	825		$	(32	)	$	6,400
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
Included in earnings		—			133			—			(585	)		18			(434	)
Included in other comprehensive loss		—			—			(5	)		—			—			(5	)
Purchases		—			—			—			—			—			—
Issuances		—			—			—			—			—			—
Settlements		(50	)		(789	)		—			—			7			(832	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—			661			—			—			—			661
Ending balance at March 31, 2019	$	300		$	5,239		$	18		$	240		$	(7	)	$	5,790

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019

Fair Value Measurement
Using Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)

(In Thousands)
Private
Issue
CMO

Loans Held
For
Investment, at
fair value ⁽¹⁾

Interest-
Only
Strips

Loan
Commitments
to Originate ⁽²⁾

Mandatory
Commitments ⁽³⁾
Total
Beginning balance at June 30, 2018 $ 350 $ 5,234 $ 23 $ 825 $ (32 ) $ 6,400
     Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
         Included in earnings — 133 — (585 ) 18 (434 )
         Included in other comprehensive loss — — (5 ) — — (5 )
     Purchases — — — — — —
     Issuances — — — — — —
     Settlements (50 ) (789 ) — — 7 (832 )
     Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 — 661 — — — 661
Ending balance at March 31, 2019 $ 300 $ 5,239 $ 18 $ 240 $ (7 ) $ 5,790

⁽¹⁾	The valuation of loans held for investment at fair value includes the management estimates of the specific credit risk attributes of each loan, in addition to the quoted secondary-market prices which account for the interest rate characteristics of each loan.

⁽²⁾	~~Consists of commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale.~~

⁽³⁾	~~Consists of mandatory loan sale commitments.~~

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2018

Fair Value Measurement
Using Significant Other Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)

(In Thousands)
Private
Issue
CMO

Loans Held
For
Investment, at
fair value ⁽¹⁾
Interest-
Only
Strips

Loan
Commit-
ments to
Originate ⁽²⁾
Manda-
tory
Commit-
ments ⁽³⁾

Option
Contracts
Total
Beginning balance at June 30, 2017 $ 461 $ 6,445 $ 31 $ 809 $ 47 $ 37 $ 7,830
     Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized):
         Included in earnings — (72 ) — 173 (99 ) (37 ) (35 )
         Included in other comprehensive loss (1 ) — (7 ) — — — (8 )
     Purchases — — — — — — —
     Issuances — — — — — — —
     Settlements (65 ) (1,899 ) — — 2 — (1,962 )
     Transfers in and/or out of Level 3 — 522 — — — — 522
Ending balance at March 31, 2018 $ 395 $ 4,996 $ 24 $ 982 $ (50 ) $ — $ 6,347

⁽¹⁾	The valuation of loans held for investment at fair value includes the management estimates of the specific credit risk attributes of each loan, in addition to the quoted secondary-market prices which account for the interest rate characteristics of each loan.

⁽²⁾	Consists of commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale.

⁽³⁾	Consists of mandatory loan sale commitments.

The following fair value hierarchy tables present information about the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s assets measured at fair value at the dates indicated on a nonrecurring basis:

	Fair Value Measurement at March 31, 2020 Using:
(In Thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Non-performing loans	$	—	$	2,073	$	1,562	$	3,635
Mortgage servicing assets	—		—		386		386
Real estate owned, net	—		—		—		—
Total	$	—	$	2,073	$	1,948	$	4,021

	Fair Value Measurement at June 30, 2019 Using:
(In Thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Non-performing loans	$	—	$	3,971	$	2,247	$	6,218
Mortgage servicing assets	—		—		627		627
Real estate owned, net	—		—		—		—
Total	$	—	$	3,971	$	2,874	$	6,845

Fair Value Measurement at March 31, 2019 Using:
(In Thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Non-performing loans $ — $ 4,541 $ 1,574 $ 6,115
Mortgage servicing assets — — 456 456
Real estate owned, net — — — —
Total $ — $ 4,541 $ 2,030 $ 6,571

Fair Value Measurement at June 30, 2018 Using:
(In Thousands) Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Non-performing loans $ — $ 4,845 $ 1,212 $ 6,057
Mortgage servicing assets — — 135 135
Real estate owned, net — 906 — 906
Total $ — $ 5,751 $ 1,347 $ 7,098

The following table presents additional information about valuation techniques and inputs used for assets and liabilities, ~~including derivative financial instruments,~~ which are measured at fair value and categorized within Level 3 as of March 31, ~~2019:~~2020:

(Dollars In Thousands)

Fair Value
As of
March 31,
2019

Valuation
Techniques
Unobservable Inputs
Range ⁽¹⁾
(Weighted Average)

Impact to
Valuation
from an
Increase in
Inputs ⁽²⁾

Assets:

Securities available - for sale:
    Private issue CMO
$ 300
Market comparable
pricing
Comparability adjustment 1.2% – 1.3% (1.2%) Increase

Loans held for investment,
    at fair value
$ 5,239
Relative value
  analysis
Broker quotes

Credit risk factors

98.3% – 105.2%
(101.1%) of par
1.2% - 100.0% (4.3%)

Increase

Decrease

Non-performing loans $ 703 Discounted cash flow Default rates 5.0% Decrease
Non-performing loans $ 871
Relative value
analysis
Loss severity 20.0% - 30.0% (21.3%) Decrease

Mortgage servicing assets $ 456 Discounted cash flow
Prepayment speed (CPR)
Discount rate

9.7% - 60.0% (21.7%)
9.0% - 10.5%(9.2%)

Decrease
Decrease

Interest-only strips $ 18 Discounted cash flow
Prepayment speed (CPR)
Discount rate

18.7% - 35.9% (34.3%)
9.0%

Decrease
Decrease

Commitments to extend credit
    on loans to be held for sale
$ 240
Relative value
analysis
TBA-MBS broker quotes
Fall-out ratio ⁽³⁾

99.0% – 103.4%
(101.6%) of par
18.5% - 19.1% (18.6%)

Increase

Decrease

Liabilities:

Mandatory loan sale
   commitments
$ 7
Relative value
analysis
TBA MBS broker quotes

Roll-forward costs ⁽⁴⁾

102.3% - 105.7%
(103.9%) of par
0.015%

Increase

Increase

(Dollars In Thousands)	Fair Value As of March 31, 2020		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Inputs	Range⁽¹⁾ (Weighted Average)	Impact to Valuation from an Increase in Inputs⁽²⁾

Assets:
Securities available-for sale: Private issue CMO	$	197	Market comparable pricing	Comparability adjustment	(9.9)% - (10.7)% ((10.0)%)	Increase

Loans held for investment, at fair value	$	3,835	Relative value analysis	Broker quotes Credit risk factor	98.0% - 104.6% (100.9%) of par 1.3% - 100.0% (4.3%)	Increase Decrease

Non-performing loans⁽³⁾	$	666	Discounted cash flow	Default rates	5.0%	Decrease

Non-performing loans⁽⁴⁾	$	896	Relative value analysis	Credit risk factor	20.0% - 30.0% (20.4%)	Decrease

Mortgage servicing assets	$	386	Discounted cash flow	Prepayment speed (CPR) Discount rate	18.7% - 60.0% (31.2%) 9.0% - 10.5% (9.1%)	Decrease Decrease

Interest-only strips	$	13	Discounted cash flow	Prepayment speed (CPR) Discount rate	18.7% - 37.5% (36.2%) 9.0%	Decrease Decrease

Liabilities:
None

⁽¹⁾	The range is based on the historical estimated fair values and management estimates.

⁽²⁾

Unless otherwise noted, this column represents the directional change in the fair value of the Level 3 investments that would result from an increase to the corresponding unobservable input. A decrease to the unobservable input would have the opposite effect. Significant changes in these inputs in isolation could result in significantly higher or lower fair value measurements.

⁽³⁾	~~The percentage~~Consists of ~~commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale which management has estimated may not fund.~~restructured loans.

⁽⁴⁾	~~An estimated cost to roll forward the mandatory loan sale commitments which management has estimated may not be delivered to the corresponding investors in a timely manner.~~Consists of other non-performing loans, excluding restructured loans.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s assets and liabilities include the following: prepayment speeds, discount rates ~~MBS – TBA quotes, estimated fallout ratios,~~and broker quotes, ~~and roll-forward costs,~~ among others. Significant increases or decreases in any of these inputs in isolation could result in significantly lower or higher fair value measurement. The various unobservable inputs used to determine valuations may have similar or diverging impacts on valuation.

4035

The carrying amount and fair value of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s other financial instruments as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018~~2019 was as follows:

	March 31, 2019										March 31, 2020
(In Thousands)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial assets:
Investment securities - held to maturity	$	102,510	$	103,056		—	$	103,056	$	—	$	69,482	$	71,399	$	—	$	71,399	$	—
Loans held for investment, not recorded at fair value	$	878,315	$	857,399		—		—	$	857,399	$	910,472	$	905,972	$	—	$	—	$	905,972
FHLB – San Francisco stock	$	8,199	$	8,199		—	$	8,199		—	$	8,199	$	8,199	$	—	$	8,199	$	—

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	876,884	$	847,875		—		—	$	847,875	$	835,831	$	807,962	$	—	$	—	$	807,962
Borrowings	$	101,121	$	101,274		—		—	$	101,274	$	131,070	$	136,606	$	—	$	—	$	136,606

June 30, 2018
(In Thousands)
Carrying
Amount

Fair
Value

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Financial assets:
   Investment securities - held to maturity $ 87,813 $ 87,239 — $ 87,239 —
   Loans held for investment, not recorded at fair value $ 897,451 $ 873,112 — — $ 873,112
   FHLB – San Francisco stock $ 8,199 $ 8,199 — $ 8,199 —

Financial liabilities:
   Deposits $ 907,598 $ 877,641 — — $ 877,641
   Borrowings $ 126,163 $ 123,778 — — $ 123,778

	June 30, 2019
(In Thousands)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Financial assets:
Investment securities - held to maturity	$	94,090	$	95,359	$	—	$	95,359	$	—
Loans held for investment, not recorded at fair value	$	874,831	$	861,374	$	—	$	—	$	861,374
FHLB – San Francisco stock	$	8,199	$	8,199	$	—	$	8,199	$	—

Financial liabilities:
Deposits	$	841,271	$	813,087	$	—	$	—	$	813,087
Borrowings	$	101,107	$	102,826	$	—	$	—	$	102,826

Investment securities - held to maturity: The investment securities - held to maturity consist of time deposits at CRA qualified minority financial institutions, U.S. SBA securities and U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS. Due to the short-term nature of the time deposits, the principal balance approximated fair value (Level 2). For the MBS and the U.S. SBA securities, the Corporation utilizes quoted prices in active markets for similar securities for its fair value measurement (Level 2).

Loans held for investment, not recorded at fair value: For loans that reprice frequently at market rates, the carrying amount approximates the fair value. For fixed-rate loans, the fair value is determined by either (i) discounting the estimated future cash flows of such loans over their estimated remaining contractual maturities using a current interest rate at which such loans would be made to borrowers, or (ii) quoted market prices.

FHLB – San Francisco stock: The carrying amount reported for FHLB – San Francisco stock approximates fair value. When redeemed, the Corporation will receive an amount equal to the par value of the stock.

Deposits: The fair value of time deposits is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation. The discount rate is based upon rates currently offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities. The fair value of transaction accounts (checking, money market and savings accounts) is estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation and management estimates of current market conditions.

Borrowings: The fair value of borrowings has been estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation. The discount rate on such borrowings is based upon rates currently offered for borrowings of similar remaining maturities.

The Corporation has various processes and controls in place to ensure that fair value is reasonably estimated. The Corporation generally determines fair value of their Level 3 assets and liabilities by using internally developed models which primarily utilize discounted cash flow techniques and prices obtained from independent management services or brokers. The Corporation performs due diligence procedures over third-party pricing service providers in order to support their use in the valuation process.

While the Corporation believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date. During the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, there were no significant changes to the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s valuation techniques that had, or are expected to have, a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Note ~~9: Incentive Plans~~

As of March 31, 2019, the Corporation had two active share-based compensation plans, which are described below. These plans are the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan ("2013 Plan") and the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan ("2010 Plan"). Additionally, the Corporation had one inactive share-based compensation plan - the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan ("2006 Plan") where no new awards can be granted but outstanding grants remain eligible for exercise.

For the quarters ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the compensation cost for these plans was $37,000 and $292,000, respectively. The income tax benefit (deficiencies) recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations per adoption of ASU 2016-09 for share-based compensation plans for the quarters ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $(10,000) and $186,000, respectively.

For the first nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, the compensation cost for these plans was $767,000 and $816,000, respectively. The income tax benefit recognized in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations per adoption of ASU 2016-09 for share-based compensation plans for the nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $114,000 and $206,000, respectively.

~~Equity Incentive Plans.~~ The Corporation established and the shareholders approved the 2013 Plan, the 2010 Plan and the 2006 Plan (collectively, "the Plans") for directors, advisory directors, directors emeriti, officers and employees of the Corporation and its subsidiary. The 2013 Plan authorizes 300,000 stock options and 300,000 shares of restricted stock. The 2013 Plan also provides that no person may be granted more than 60,000 stock options or 45,000 shares of restricted stock in any one year. The 2010 Plan authorizes 586,250 stock options and 288,750 shares of restricted stock. The 2010 Plan also provides that no person may be granted more than 117,250 stock options or 43,312 shares of restricted stock in any one year. The 2006 Plan authorized 365,000 stock options and 185,000 shares of restricted stock. The 2006 Plan also provided that no person was granted more than 73,000 stock options or 27,750 shares of restricted stock in any one year.

~~Equity Incentive Plans - Stock Options.~~ Under the Plans, options may not be granted at a price less than the fair market value at the date of the grant. Options typically vest over a five-year or shorter period as long as the director, advisory director, director emeritus, officer or employee remains in service to the Corporation. The options are exercisable after vesting for up to the remaining term of the original grant. The maximum term of the options granted is 10 years.

The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option valuation model with the following assumptions. The expected volatility is based on implied volatility from historical common stock closing prices for the prior 84 months. The expected dividend yield is based on the most recent quarterly dividend on an annualized basis. The expected term is based on the historical experience of all fully vested stock option grants and is reviewed

~~annually. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury note rate with a term similar to the underlying stock option on the particular grant date.~~

During the third quarter of fiscal 2019, no options were granted or forfeited, and 11,250 options were exercised. This compares to the third quarter of fiscal 2018 when no options were granted or forfeited, and 56,500 options were exercised. During the first nine months of fiscal 2019, no options were granted or forfeited, and 31,250 options were exercised. This compares to the first nine months of fiscal 2018 when no options were granted, and 83,750 options were exercised and 2,500 options were forfeited. As of March 31, 2019 and 2018, there were 147,500 stock options available for future grants under the Plans at both dates.

~~The following tables summarize the stock option activity in the Plans for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2019.~~

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2019
Options Shares
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000)

Outstanding at December 31, 2018 509,000 $ 12.83
Granted — $ —
Exercised (11,250 ) $ 14.59
Forfeited — $ —
Outstanding at March 31, 2019 497,750 $ 12.79 4.53 $ 3,551
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2019 495,150 $ 12.75 4.52 $ 3,550
Exercisable at March 31, 2019 484,750 $ 12.60 4.45 $ 3,546

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019
Options Shares
Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price

Weighted-
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (Years)

Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
($000)

Outstanding at June 30, 2018 529,000 $ 12.77
Granted — $ —
Exercised (31,250 ) $ 12.49
Forfeited — $ —
Outstanding at March 31, 2019 497,750 $ 12.79 4.53 $ 3,551
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2019 495,150 $ 12.75 4.52 $ 3,550
Exercisable at March 31, 2019 484,750 $ 12.60 4.45 $ 3,546

As of March 31, 2019 and 2018, there was $68,000 and $503,000 of unrecognized compensation expense, respectively, related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements under the Plans. The expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years and 1.0 years, respectively. The forfeiture rate during the first nine months of fiscal 2019 and 2018 was 20 percent for both periods, and was calculated by using the historical forfeiture experience of stock option grants and is reviewed annually.

~~Equity Incentive Plans – Restricted Stock.~~ The Corporation used 300,000 shares, 288,750 shares and 185,000 shares of its treasury stock to fund the 2013 Plan, the 2010 Plan and the 2006 Plan, respectively. Awarded shares typically vest over a five-year or shorter period as long as the director, advisory director, director emeriti, officer or employee remains in service to the Corporation. Once vested, a recipient of restricted stock will have all rights of a shareholder, including the power to vote and the right to receive dividends. The Corporation recognizes compensation expense for the restricted stock awards based on the fair value of the shares at the award date.

There were no restricted stock awards and no forfeitures, while there were 3,000 shares of restricted stock vested in the third quarter of fiscal 2019. This compares to no restricted stock activity in the third quarter of fiscal 2018, other than the vesting of 10,500 shares. For the first nine months of fiscal 2019, there was no restricted stock activity, other than the vesting of 89,500 shares. This compares to no restricted stock activity, other than the vesting of 10,500 shares and the forfeiture of 2,000 shares for the first nine months of fiscal 2018. As of March 31, 2019 and 2018, there were 267,750 shares of restricted stock available for future awards under the Plans at both dates.

~~The following tables summarize the unvested restricted stock activity for the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2019.~~

For the Quarter Ended
March 31, 2019

Unvested Shares Shares
Weighted-
Average
Award Date
Fair Value

Unvested at December 31, 2018 12,000 $ 18.31
Granted — $ —
Vested (3,000 ) $ 18.90
Forfeited — $ —
Unvested at March 31, 2019 9,000 $ 18.11
Expected to vest at March 31, 2019 7,200 $ 18.11

For the Nine Months Ended
March 31, 2019

Unvested Shares Shares
Weighted-
Average
Award Date
Fair Value

Unvested at June 30, 2018 98,500 $ 14.35
Granted — $ —
Vested (89,500 ) $ 13.97
Forfeited — $ —
Unvested at March 31, 2019 9,000 $ 18.11
Expected to vest at March 31, 2019 7,200 $ 18.11

As of March 31, 2019 and 2018, the unrecognized compensation expense was $131,000 and $687,000, respectively, related to unvested share-based compensation arrangements under the Plans, and reported as a reduction to stockholders' equity. This expense is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.5 years and 1.2 years, respectively. Similar to stock options, a forfeiture rate of 20 percent has been applied for the restricted stock compensation expense calculations in the first nine months of fiscal 2019 and 2018.

~~Note 10:~~8: Reclassification Adjustment of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI")

The following tables provide the changes in AOCI by component for the ~~quarters~~quarter and nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

	For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2020
	Unrealized gains and losses on
(In Thousands)	Investment securities available for sale			Interest- only strips		Total

Beginning balance at December 31, 2019	$	124		$	9	$	133

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	(66		)	—		(66		)
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	—			—		—
Net other comprehensive loss	(66		)	—		(66		)

Ending balance at March 31, 2020	$	58		$	9	$	67

	For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2019
	Unrealized gains and losses on
(In Thousands)	Investment securities available for sale			Interest- only strips			Total

Beginning balance at December 31, 2018	$	154		$	15		$	169

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	(4		)	(2		)	(6		)
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	—			—			—
Net other comprehensive loss	(4		)	(2		)	(6		)

Ending balance at March 31, 2019	$	150		$	13		$	163

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2019
Unrealized gains and losses on
(In Thousands)
Investment securities
available for sale

Interest-
only strips
Total

Beginning balance at December 31, 2018 $ 154 $ 15 $ 169

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (4 ) (2 ) (6 )
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income — — —
Net other comprehensive loss (4 ) (2 ) (6 )

Ending balance at March 31, 2019 $ 150 $ 13 $ 163

For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2018
Unrealized gains and losses on
(In Thousands)
Investment securities
available for sale

Interest-
only strips
Total

Beginning balance at December 31, 2017 $ 195 $ 15 $ 210

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (20 ) (2 ) (22 )
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (2 ) — (2 )
Net other comprehensive loss (22 ) (2 ) (24 )

Ending balance at March 31, 2018 $ 173 $ 13 $ 186

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019
Unrealized gains and losses on
(In Thousands)
Investment securities
available for sale

Interest-
only strips
Total

Beginning balance at June 30, 2018 $ 194 $ 16 $ 210

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (44 ) (3 ) (47 )
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income — — —
Net other comprehensive loss (44 ) (3 ) (47 )

Ending balance at March 31, 2019 $ 150 $ 13 $ 163
37

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2018
Unrealized gains and losses on
(In Thousands)
Investment securities
available for sale

Interest-
only strips
Total

Beginning balance at June 30, 2017 $ 211 $ 18 $ 229

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (78 ) (8 ) (86 )
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income 40 3 43
Net other comprehensive loss (38 ) (5 ) (43 )

Ending balance at March 31, 2018 $ 173 $ 13 $ 186

~~Note 11: Offsetting Derivative and Other Financial Instruments~~

	For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2020
	Unrealized gains and losses on
(In Thousands)	Investment securities available for sale			Interest- only strips			Total

Beginning balance at June 30, 2019	$	150		$	11		$	161

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	(92		)	(2		)	(94		)
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	—			—			—
Net other comprehensive loss	(92		)	(2		)	(94		)

Ending balance at March 31, 2020	$	58		$	9		$	67

The Corporation's derivative transactions are generally governed by International Swaps and Derivatives Association Master Agreements and similar arrangements, which include provisions governing the setoff of assets and liabilities between the parties. When the Corporation has more than one outstanding derivative transaction with a single counterparty, the setoff provisions contained within these agreements generally allow the non-defaulting party the right to reduce its liability to the defaulting party by amounts eligible for setoff, including the collateral received as well as eligible offsetting transactions with that counterparty, irrespective of the currency, place of payment, or booking office. The Corporation's policy is to present its derivative assets and derivative liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition on a net basis. The derivative assets and liabilities are comprised of mandatory loan sale commitments, TBA MBS trades and option contracts.

The following tables present the gross and net amounts of derivative assets and liabilities and other financial instruments as reported in the Corporation's Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition, and the gross amount not offset in the Corporation's Condensed Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition as of the dates indicated.

~~As of March 31, 2019:~~

~~Gross~~

~~Net~~

~~Amount~~

~~Offset in the~~

~~of Assets in~~

~~Gross Amount Not Offset in~~

~~Condensed~~

~~the Condensed~~

~~the Condensed Consolidated~~

~~Gross~~

~~Consolidated~~

~~Statements of Financial Condition~~

~~Amount of~~

~~Statements~~

~~Cash~~

~~Recognized~~

~~of Financial~~

~~Financial~~

~~Collateral~~

~~Net~~

~~(In Thousands)~~

~~Assets~~

~~Condition~~

~~Instruments~~

~~Received~~

~~Amount~~

~~Assets~~

~~Derivatives~~

$—

~~Total~~

$—

   Gross Net
   Amount Amount
   Offset in the of Liabilities in Gross Amount Not Offset in
   Condensed the Condensed the Condensed Consolidated
Gross Consolidated Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
Amount of Statements Statements Cash
Recognized of Financial of Financial Financial Collateral Net
(In Thousands) Liabilities Condition Condition Instruments Received Amount
Liabilities
   Derivatives $224 $— $224 $— $— $224
Total $224 $— $224 $— $— $224

~~As of June 30, 2018:~~

~~Gross~~

~~Net~~

~~Amount~~

~~Offset in the~~

~~of Assets in~~

~~Gross Amount Not Offset in~~

~~Condensed~~

~~the Condensed~~

~~the Condensed Consolidated~~

~~Gross~~

~~Consolidated~~

~~Statements of Financial Condition~~

~~Amount of~~

~~Statements~~

~~Cash~~

~~Recognized~~

~~of Financial~~

~~Financial~~

~~Collateral~~

~~Net~~

~~(In Thousands)~~

~~Assets~~

~~Condition~~

~~Instruments~~

~~Received~~

~~Amount~~

~~Assets~~

~~Derivatives~~

$—

~~Total~~

$—

   Gross Net
   Amount Amount
   Offset in the of Liabilities in Gross Amount Not Offset in
   Condensed the Condensed the Condensed Consolidated
Gross Consolidated Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition
Amount of Statements Statements Cash
Recognized of Financial of Financial Financial Collateral Net
(In Thousands) Liabilities Condition Condition Instruments Received Amount
Liabilities
   Derivatives $440 $— $440 $— $— $440
Total $440 $— $440 $— $— $440

	For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019
	Unrealized gains and losses on
(In Thousands)	Investment securities available for sale			Interest- only strips			Total

Beginning balance at June 30, 2018	$	194		$	16		$	210

Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications	(44		)	(3		)	(47		)
Amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	—			—			—
Net other comprehensive loss	(44		)	(3		)	(47		)

Ending balance at March 31, 2019	$	150		$	13		$	163

Note ~~12:~~9: Revenue From Contracts With Customers

In accordance with ASC 606, revenues are recognized when goods or services are transferred to the customer in exchange for the consideration the ~~Company~~Corporation expects to be entitled to receive. The largest portion of the ~~Company's~~Corporation's revenue is from interest income, which is not in the scope of ASC 606. All of the ~~Company's~~Corporation's revenue from contracts with customers in the scope of ASC 606 is recognized in non-interest income.

If a contract is determined to be within the scope of ASC 606, the ~~Company~~Corporation recognizes revenue as it satisfies a performance obligation. Payments from customers are generally collected at the time services are rendered, monthly or quarterly. For contracts with customers within the scope of ASC 606, revenue is either earned at a point in time or revenue is earned over time. Examples of revenue earned at a point in time are automated teller machine ("ATM") transaction fees, wire transfer fees, overdraft fees and interchange fees. Revenue is primarily based on the number and type of transactions that are generally derived from transactional information accumulated by our systems and is recognized immediately as the transactions occur or upon providing the service to complete the customer's transaction. The ~~Company~~Corporation is generally the principal in these contracts, with the exception of interchanges fees, in which case the ~~Company~~Corporation is acting as the agent and records revenue net of expenses paid to the principal. Examples of revenue earned over time, which generally occur on a monthly basis, are deposit account maintenance fees, investment advisory fees, merchant revenue, trust and investment management fees and safe deposit box fees. Revenue is generally derived from transactional information accumulated by our systems or those of third-parties and is recognized as the related transactions occur or services are rendered to the customer.

Disaggregation of Revenue:

The following table includes the ~~Company's~~Corporation's non-interest income disaggregated by type of services for the ~~quarters~~quarter and nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

For the Quarters Ended
March 31,

For the Nine Months Ended
March 31,

Type of Services 2019 2018 2019 2018
(In Thousands)
Asset management fees $ 77 $ 87 $ 215 $ 294
Debit card and ATM fees 395 394 1,227 1,190
Deposit related fees 484 549 1,522 1,659
Loan related fees 12 (6 ) 25 (42 )
BOLI ⁽¹⁾
47 65 140 199
Loan servicing fees ⁽¹⁾
262 493 863 1,173
Net gain on sale of loans ⁽¹⁾
1,719 3,597 7,114 12,761
Other 56 31 90 69
Total non-interest income $ 3,052 $ 5,210 $ 11,196 $ 17,303

	For the Quarter Ended March 31,				For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
Type of Services	2020		2019		2020			2019
(In Thousands)
Asset management fees	$	70	$	77	$	234		$	215
Debit card and ATM fees	380		395		1,195			1,227
Deposit related fees	439		484		1,370			1,522
Loan related fees	12		12		26			25
BOLI ⁽¹⁾	48		47		141			140
Loan servicing fees ⁽¹⁾	131		262		631			863
Net gain (loss) on sale of loans ^{(1) (2)}	14		1,719		(115		)	7,114
Other	7		56		33			90
Total non-interest income	$	1,101	$	3,052	$	3,515		$	11,196

⁽¹⁾	Not in scope of ASC ~~606~~.606.

⁽²⁾	There were no loan sales in the quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2020 as compared to the loan sale volume of $95.8 million and $408.9 million for the quarter and first nine months of fiscal 2019, respectively.

For the ~~quarters~~quarter and nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, substantially all of the ~~Company's~~Corporation's revenues within the scope of ASC 606 are for performance obligations satisfied at a specified date.

Revenues recognized in scope of ASC 606:

Asset management fees: Asset management fees are variable, since they are based on the underlying portfolio value, which is subject to market conditions and amounts invested by clients through a third-party provider. Asset management fees are recognized over the period that services are provided, and when the portfolio values are known or can be estimated at the end of each ~~month~~.month.

Debit card and ATM fees: Debit and ATM interchange income represents fees earned when a debit card issued by the Bank is used. The Bank earns interchange fees from debit cardholder transactions through a third party payment network. Interchange fees from cardholder transactions represent a percentage of the underlying transaction value and are recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to the cardholder. The performance obligation is satisfied and the fees are earned when the cost of the transaction is charged to the cardholders' debit card. Certain expenses directly associated with the debit cards are recorded on a net basis with the interchange income.

Deposit related fees: Fees are earned on the Bank's deposit accounts for various products offered to or services performed for the Bank's customers. Fees include business account fees, non-sufficient fund fees, stop payment fees, wire services, safe deposit box and others. These fees are recognized on a daily, monthly or quarterly basis, depending on the type of service.

Loan related fees: Non-interest loan fee income is earned on loans that the Bank services, excluding loan servicing fees which are not within the scope of ASC 606. Loan related fees include prepayment fees, late charges, brokered loan fees, maintenance fees and others. These fees are recognized on a daily, monthly, quarterly or annual basis, depending on the type of service.

Other: Fees earned on other services, such as merchant services or occasional non-recurring type services, are recognized at the time of the event or the applicable billing cycle.

Note ~~13: Income Taxes~~10: Leases

~~On December 22, 2017, the U.S. Government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts~~The Corporation accounts for its leases in accordance with ASC 842, which was implemented on July 1, 2019, and Jobs Act (the "Tax Act"). The Tax Act amends the Internal Revenue Code to reduce tax rates and modify policies, credits, and deductions for individuals and businesses. For businesses, the Tax Act reduces the corporate federal tax income rate from a maximum of 35 percent to a flat 21 percent. The federal corporate tax rate reduction was effective January 1, 2018. Sincerequires the Corporation ~~has a fiscal year end~~to record liabilities for future lease obligations as well as assets representing the right to use the underlying leased assets. The Corporation’s leases primarily represent future obligations to make payments for the use of ~~June 30~~^th~~, the reduced federal corporate income tax rate~~buildings, space or equipment for its ~~fiscal year 2018 resulted~~operations. Liabilities to make future lease payments are recorded in accounts payable, accrued interest and other liabilities, while right-of-use assets are recorded in premises and equipment in the ~~application~~Corporation’s condensed consolidated statements of ~~a blended federal statutory income tax rate~~financial condition. At March 31, 2020, all of ~~28.06 percent, which is based on~~ the ~~applicable tax rates before~~Corporation’s leases were classified as operating leases and ~~after the Tax Act and corresponding number of days in the fiscal year before and after enactment, and then a flat 21 percent tax rate thereafter.~~

~~Under generally accepted accounting principles,~~ the Corporation ~~uses the asset~~did not have any operating leases with an initial term of 12 months or less (“short-term leases”). Liabilities to make future lease payments and ~~liability method~~right of ~~accounting~~use assets are recorded for ~~income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets~~operating leases and ~~liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and~~do not include short-term leases. These liabilities and ~~their respective tax bases. Deferred tax~~right-of-use assets ~~and liabilities~~ are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. At June 30, 2017, the Corporation's deferred tax assets and liabilities were determined based on the ~~then-current enacted federal tax~~total contractual base rents for each lease, which include options to extend or renew each lease, where applicable, and where the Corporation believes it has an economic incentive to extend or renew the lease. Due to the fact that lease extensions are not reasonably certain, the Corporation generally does not recognize payments occurring during option periods in the calculation of its operating right-of-use lease assets and operating lease liabilities. The Corporation utilizes the FHLB - San Francisco rates as a discount rate ~~of 35 percent. As a result~~for each of the ~~reduction~~remaining contractual terms at the adoption date as well as for future leases if the discount rate is not stated in the ~~federal corporate income tax rate under the Tax Act,~~lease. For leases that contain variable lease payments, the Corporation ~~revalued its deferred tax assets and liabilities~~assumes future lease payment escalations based on a lease payment escalation rate specified in the lease or the specified index rate observed at ~~December 31, 2017. Deferred tax assets and liabilities realized in fiscal year 2018 were re-measured~~the time of lease commencement. Liabilities to make future lease payments are accounted for using the ~~aforementioned blended rate. All remaining deferred tax~~interest method, being reduced by periodic contractual lease payments net of periodic interest accretion. Right-of-use assets for operating leases are amortized over the term of the associated lease by amounts that represent the difference between periodic straight-line lease expense and ~~liabilities were re-measured using the new statutory federal rate of 21 percent. These re-measurements collectively resulted in a discrete tax expense of $1.9 million that was recognized~~periodic interest accretion in the ~~first~~related liability to make future lease payments.

For the quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2020, expenses associated with the Corporation’s leases totaled $212,000 and $613,000, respectively, and was recorded in premises and occupancy expenses and equipment expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of ~~fiscal 2018.~~operations.

The following table presents supplemental information related to operating leases at the date and for the periods indicated:

(In Thousands)	Quarter Ended March 31, 2020		Nine Months Ended March 31, 2020		As of March 31, 2020
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Condition:
Premises and equipment - Operating lease right of use assets					$	2,745
Accounts payable, accrued interest and other liabilities – Operating lease liabilities					$	2,877

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Premises and occupancy expenses from operating leases^{(1) (2)}	$	195	$	569
Equipment expenses from operating leases	$	17	$	44

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Operating cash flows from operating leases, net⁽²⁾	$	243	$	806

⁽¹⁾	Variable lease costs are immaterial.

⁽²⁾	Revenue related to sublease activity is immaterial and netted against operating lease expenses.

The ~~estimated combined federal~~following table provides information related to remaining minimum contractual lease payments and ~~state statutory tax rates, before discrete items, for fiscal years 2019 and 2018 are~~other information associated with the Corporation’s leases as ~~follows:~~of March 31, 2020:

Statutory Tax Rates FY2019 FY2018
Federal Tax Rate 21.00% 28.06%
State Tax Rate 10.84% 10.84%
Combined Statutory Tax Rate ⁽¹⁾
29.56% 35.86%

	Amount⁽¹⁾
Year Ending June 30,	(In Thousands)
2020	$	233
2021	753
2022	677
2023	478
2024	361
Thereafter	530
Total contract lease payments	$	3,032

Total liability to make lease payments	$	2,877
Difference in undiscounted and discounted future lease payments	$	155
Weighted average discount rate			2.15	%
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)			4.7

⁽¹⁾ Contractual base rents do not include property taxes and other operating expenses due under respective lease agreements.

The following table summarizes the impact of the adoption of the new lease accounting guidance on the Corporation’s condensed consolidated statements of financial condition as of July 1, 2019:

(In Thousands)	June 30, 2019		Adjustments due to new lease guidance		July 1, 2019		March 31, 2020
Total assets	$	1,084,850	$	3,399	$	1,088,249	$	1,107,567
Total liabilities	$	964,209	$	3,704	$	967,913	$	984,409
Total equity	$	120,641	$	—	$	120,641	$	123,158

⁽¹⁾ ~~The combined statutory tax rate is net of the federal tax benefit for the state tax deduction.~~

The Corporation's effective tax rate may differ from the estimated statutory tax rates described above due to discrete items such as further adjustments to net deferred tax assets, excess tax benefits derived from stock option exercises and non-taxable earnings from bank owned life insurance, among other items.

Note ~~14:~~12: Subsequent ~~Event~~Events

On April 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Corporation announced that the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share. Shareholders of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s common stock at the close of business on May 21, ~~2019 will be~~2020 are entitled to receive the cash dividend. The cash dividend will be payable on June 11, ~~2019.~~2020.

On April 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Corporation announced that the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Board of Directors authorized ~~a one-year extension~~the repurchase of up to five percent of the ~~April 2018 stock repurchase plan. To date, a total of 23,748 shares of the Corporation's~~Corporation’s common stock, ~~have been purchased under~~or approximately 371,815 shares. The Corporation will purchase the ~~plan, leaving 349,252~~ shares ~~of the Corporation's common stock authorized for purchase~~ from time to time in the open market or inthrough privately negotiated transactions ~~prior~~over a one-year period depending on market conditions, the capital requirements of the Corporation, and available cash that can be allocated to the ~~expiration of the extension on April 26, 2020.~~stock repurchase program, among other considerations.

ITEM 2 – ~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General

Provident Financial Holdings, Inc., a Delaware corporation, was organized in January 1996 for the purpose of becoming the holding company of Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. ("the Bank") upon the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s conversion from a federal mutual to a federal stock savings bank ~~("Conversion"~~(“Conversion”). The Conversion was completed on June 27, 1996. The Corporation is regulated by the Federal Reserve Board ~~("FRB"~~(“FRB”). At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Corporation had total assets of ~~$1.12~~$1.11 billion, total deposits of ~~$876.9~~$835.8 million and total ~~stockholders'~~stockholders’ equity of ~~$121.2~~$123.2 million. The Corporation has not engaged in any significant activity other than holding the stock of the Bank. Accordingly, the information set forth in this report, including financial statements and related data, relates primarily to the Bank and its subsidiaries. As used in this report, the terms ~~"we," "our," "us,"~~“we,” “our,” “us,” and ~~"Corporation"~~“Corporation” refer to Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise.

The Bank, founded in 1956, is a federally chartered stock savings bank headquartered in Riverside, California. The Bank is regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ~~("OCC"~~(“OCC”), its primary federal regulator, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ~~("FDIC"~~(“FDIC”), the insurer of its deposits. The ~~Bank's~~Bank’s deposits are federally insured up to applicable limits by the FDIC. The Bank has been a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System since 1956.

The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation operates in a single business ~~consists of community banking activities and mortgage banking activities, conducted by Provident Bank and Provident Bank Mortgage ("PBM"), a division of~~segment through the Bank. ~~Community~~The Bank's activities include attracting deposits, offering banking ~~activities primarily consist of accepting deposits from customers within the communities surrounding the Bank's full service offices~~services and ~~investing those funds in~~originating and purchasing single-family, ~~loans,~~ multi-family, ~~loans,~~ commercial real estate, ~~loans,~~ construction ~~loans,~~and, to a lesser extent, other mortgage, commercial business ~~loans,~~and consumer ~~loans and other real estate~~ loans. ~~The Bank also offers business checking accounts, other business~~Deposits are collected primarily from 13 banking services, and services loans for others. Mortgage banking activities consist of the origination and sale of mortgage loans secured primarily by single-family residences. The Bank currently operates 14 retail/business banking officeslocations located in Riverside ~~County~~ and San Bernardino ~~County (commonly known as the Inland Empire). The Corporation's revenues~~counties in California. Loans are ~~derived principally from interest on its loans~~primarily originated and ~~investment securities~~purchased in Southern and ~~fees generated through its community banking and mortgage banking activities.~~Northern California. There are various risks inherent in the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s business including, among others, the

general business environment, interest rates, the California real estate market, the demand for loans, the prepayment of loans, the repurchase of loans previously sold to investors, the secondary market conditions to buy and sell loans, competitive conditions, legislative and regulatory changes, fraud and other risks.

On February 4, 2019, the Corporation announced that the Corporation's Board of Directors determined that it was in the long-term best interests of the Corporation to exit the operations of the Corporation's mortgage banking segment conducted through PBM.

The Corporation began to distribute quarterly cash dividends in the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~September 30, 2002. On January ~~29, 2019,~~28, 2020, the Corporation declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share for the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s shareholders of record at the close of business on February ~~19, 2019,~~18, 2020, which was paid on March ~~12, 2019.~~10, 2020. Future declarations or payments of dividends will be subject to the consideration of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Board of Directors, which will take into account the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s financial condition, results of operations, tax considerations, capital requirements, industry standards, legal restrictions, economic conditions and other factors, including the regulatory restrictions which affect the payment of dividends by the Bank to the Corporation. Under Delaware law, dividends may be paid either out of surplus or, if there is no surplus, out of net profits for the current fiscal year and/or the preceding fiscal year in which the dividend is declared.

On April 30, ~~2019,~~2020, the Corporation announced that the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.14 per share. Shareholders of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s common stock at the close of business on May 21, ~~2019~~2020 will be entitled to receive the cash dividend. The cash dividend will be payable on June 11, ~~2019.~~2020.

~~Management's~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is intended to assist in understanding the financial condition and results of operations of the Corporation. The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with the Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying selected Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Safe-Harbor Statement

Certain matters in this Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. This Form 10-Q contains statements that the Corporation believes are ~~"forward-looking~~“forward-looking statements."” These statements relate to the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s financial condition, liquidity, results of operations, plans, objectives, future performance or business. ~~You should not place undue reliance on these statements, as they are subject to risks and uncertainties.~~ When considering these forward-looking statements, you should keep in mind these risks and uncertainties, as well as any cautionary statements the Corporation may make. Moreover, you should treat these statements as speaking only as of the date they are made and based only on information then actually known to the Corporation. There are a number of important factors that could cause future results to differ materially from historical performance and these forward-looking statements. Factors which could cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to the following: the ~~possibility that~~effect of the ~~actual costs incurred from our exiting~~novel coronavirus of 2019 (“COVID-19”) pandemic, including on the ~~mortgage banking~~Corporation’s credit quality and business operations, as well as its impact on general economic and ~~the possibility that the actual changes in pre-tax losses~~financial market conditions and other uncertainties resulting from the ~~mortgage banking segment~~COVID-19 pandemic, such as the extent and our pre-tax income will be materially different from the estimated changes provided in this report; the possibility that our mortgage banking business may experience increased volatility in its revenues and earnings before the discontinuationduration of the ~~mortgage banking business,~~impact on public health, the U.S. and global economies, and consumer and corporate customers, including economic activity, employment levels and market liquidity; the credit risks of lending activities, including changes in the level and trend of loan delinquencies and charge-offs and changes in our allowance for loan losses and provision for loan losses that may be impacted by deterioration in the residential and commercial real estate markets and may lead to increased losses and non-performing assets and may result in our allowance for loan losses not being adequate to cover actual losses and require us to materially increase our reserve; changes in general economic conditions, either nationally or in our market areas; changes in the levels of general interest rates, and the relative differences between short and long term interest rates, deposit interest rates, our net interest margin and funding sources; uncertainty regarding the future of the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"), and the potential transition away from LIBOR toward new interest rate benchmarks; fluctuations in the demand for loans, the number of unsold homes, land and other properties and fluctuations in real estate values in our market areas; secondary market conditions for loans and our ability to purchase and sell loans in the secondary market; results of examinations of the Corporation by the FRB or of the Bank by the OCC or other regulatory authorities, including the possibility that any such regulatory authority may, among other things, require us to enter into a formal enforcement action or to increase our allowance for loan losses, write-down assets, change our regulatory capital

position or affect our ability to borrow funds or maintain or increase deposits, or impose additional requirements and restrictions on us, any of which could adversely affect our liquidity and earnings; legislative or regulatory changes that adversely affect our business including changes in regulatory policies and principles, including the interpretation of regulatory capital or other rules, including as a result of Basel III; the impact of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, California Consumer Privacy Act and the implementing regulations; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations or to respond to regulatory actions; adverse changes in the securities markets; our ability to attract and retain deposits; increases in premiums for deposit insurance; our ability to control operating costs and expenses; the use of estimates in determining fair value of certain of our assets, which estimates may prove to be incorrect and result in significant declines in valuation; difficulties in reducing risk associated with the loans on our balance sheet; staffing fluctuations in response to product demand or the implementation of corporate strategies that affect our workforce and potential associated charges; disruptions, security breaches, or other adverse events, failures or interruptions in, or attacks on, our information technology systems or on the third-party vendors who perform several of our critical processing functions; our ability to implement our branch expansion strategy; our ability to successfully integrate any assets, liabilities, customers, systems, and management personnel we have acquired or may in the future acquire into our operations and our ability to realize related revenue synergies and cost savings within expected time frames and any goodwill charges related thereto; our ability to manage loan delinquency rates; our ability to retain key members of our senior management team; costs and effects of litigation, including settlements and judgments; increased competitive pressures among financial services companies; changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits; the availability of resources to address changes in laws, rules, or regulations

or to respond to regulatory actions; our ability to pay dividends on our common stock; adverse changes in the securities markets; the inability of key third-party providers to perform their obligations to us; changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the financial institution regulatory agencies or the Financial Accounting Standards Board, including additional guidance and interpretation on accounting issues and details of the implementation of new accounting methods; war or terrorist activities; and other economic, competitive, governmental, regulatory, and technological factors affecting our operations, pricing, products and services including the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act of 2020 ("CARES Act") and other risks detailed in this report and in the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s other reports filed with or furnished to the SEC. These developments could have an adverse impact on our financial position and our results of operations. Forward-looking statements are based upon ~~management's~~management’s beliefs and assumptions at the time they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements included in this document or to update the reasons why actual results could differ from those contained in such statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking statements discussed in this document might not occur, and you should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations is based upon the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Corporation's critical accounting policies are described in the ~~Corporation's 2018~~Corporation’s 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, ~~2018~~2019 in the Critical Accounting Policies section of Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and in Note 1 - Organization and Significant Accounting Policies. There have been no significant changes during the nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 to the critical accounting policies as described in the ~~Corporation's 2018~~Corporation’s 2019 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

Executive Summary and Operating Strategy

Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B., established in 1956, is a financial services company committed to serving consumers and small to mid-sized businesses in the Inland Empire region of Southern California. The Bank conducts its business operations as Provident Bank ~~Provident Bank Mortgage, a division of the Bank,~~ and through its subsidiary, Provident Financial Corp. The business activities of the Corporation, primarily through the Bank and its subsidiary, consist of community ~~banking, mortgage~~ banking and, to a lesser degree, investment services for customers and trustee services on behalf of the Bank.

Community banking operations primarily consist of accepting deposits from customers within the communities surrounding the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s full service offices and investing those funds in single-family, multi-family and commercial real estate loans. Also, to a lesser extent, the Corporation makes construction, commercial business, consumer and other mortgage loans. The primary source of income in community banking is net interest income, which is the difference between the interest income earned on loans and investment securities, and the interest expense paid on interest-bearing deposits and borrowed funds. Additionally, certain fees are collected from borrowers and depositors, such as late payment charges, prepayment fees, returned check fees, deposit account service charges, ATM fees, IRA/KEOGH fees, safe deposit box fees, wire transfer fees and overdraft protection fees, among others.

During the next three years, subject to market conditions, the Corporation intends to improve its community banking business by moderately increasing total ~~assets;~~assets by increasing single-family, ~~mortgage loans and higher yielding loans (i.e.,~~ multi-family, commercial real estate, construction and commercial business ~~loans).~~loans. In addition, the Corporation intends to decrease the percentage of time deposits in its deposit base and to increase the percentage of lower cost checking and savings accounts. This strategy is intended to improve core revenue through a higher net interest margin and ultimately, coupled with the anticipated growth of ~~the Corporation,~~total assets, an increase in net interest income. While the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s long-term strategy is for moderate growth, management recognizes that growth may not occur as a result of weaknesses in general economic conditions. Because the length of the COVID-19 pandemic and the efficacy of the extraordinary measures being put in place to address its economic consequences are unknown, including the recent 150 basis point reductions in the targeted Federal Funds Rate, until the pandemic subsides, the Corporation expects its net interest income and net interest margin will be adversely affected in 2020 and possibly longer.

~~Mortgage banking~~Saleable single-family mortgage loan operations primarily consist of the origination and sale of mortgage loans secured by single-family residences. The primary sources of income in the saleable mortgage ~~banking~~loan operations are gain on sale of loans and certain fees collected from borrowers in connection with the loan origination process. On February 4, 2019, the Corporation announced that it was in the ~~long-term~~ best interests of the Corporation to ~~discontinue the operations of the Corporation's mortgage banking segment conducted through PBM.~~

This decision was reached after an analysis of current economic conditions and the current operating environment for the highly competitive mortgage banking business, including the significant decline in loan origination volume. The Corporation had been pursuing a strategy of improving the profitability of its mortgage banking business by significantly reducing operating expenses commensurate with the significant decline in loan origination volume while maintaining loan sale margins and prudent underwriting standards. However, based on the operating environment and market conditions for the foreseeable future, the Corporation determined that it would be unable to successfully execute that strategy within a reasonable period of time.

~~The Corporation plans to continue to originate~~scale back saleable single-family mortgage ~~loans for retention~~loan originations and improve on its balance sheet, primarily within its market area, the Inland Empire region of Southern California and purchase these loans consistent with its historical activity in this regard. Upon termination of PBM's mortgage banking operations, PBM will no longer be reported as a segment of the Corporation. The Corporation currently estimates that PBM's mortgage banking operations will end on or before June 30, 2019 and expects that the headcount in the Corporation will decrease by approximately 122 full time equivalent employees by that date.

~~As a result of exiting the mortgage banking business, the Corporation estimates:~~

quarterly net interest income from the mortgage banking segment to decline approximately $306,000 (net of funding costs) by the first quarter of fiscal 2020 from $306,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2019 due to the decrease in loans held for sale,

~~quarterly non-interest income from the mortgage banking segment to decline approximately $2.7 million by the first quarter of fiscal 2020 from $2.7 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2019,~~

~~quarterly non-interest expense from the mortgage banking segment to decrease approximately $4.6 million by the first quarter of fiscal 2020 from $4.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2019,~~

quarterly non-interest income from the community banking segment to increase approximately $272,000 to $1.2 million by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2020 from $906,000 in the second quarter of fiscal 2019 as a result of the discontinuation of inter-company charges to compensate PBM for originating loans held for investment and for servicing fees on loans sold on a servicing retained basis,

quarterly non-interest expense from the community banking segment to increase approximately $649,000 to $6.9 million by the end of the first quarter of fiscal 2020 from $6.3 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2019 as a result of retaining certain mortgage banking personnel to continue to originate and purchase single-family mortgage loans for retention on the Bank's balance sheet and discontinuation of the management fee allocation from the Bank to the mortgage banking segment,

~~the estimated fully phased in quarterly impact of these changes in fiscal 2020 will be~~efforts to increase the ~~pre-tax income by approximately $1.2 million per quarter in comparison to the second quarter~~volume of ~~fiscal 2019,~~

~~the Corporation will stop accepting~~portfolio single-family mortgage loan applications and loan locks from the mortgage banking segment early in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2019, as a result, revenues will decrease more quickly than expenses but the declines in each cannot be accurately forecast for the time period the Corporation is effecting the exit from the mortgage banking business, and

~~to stop operating its mortgage banking business as a defined segment with separate mortgage banking segment reporting prior to the first quarter of fiscal 2020.~~

~~The Corporation also estimates that it will:~~

incur total one-time costs of approximately $3.6 million to $4.0 million, which amounts include costs for severance, retention, personnel, premises, occupancy, depreciation, and costs related to termination of data processing and other contractual arrangements, and

~~have estimated cash outlays of approximately $3.5 million to $3.9 million of its total estimated one-time costs (consistent with the amounts above less depreciation).~~

~~Once the mortgage banking exit has been completed, the future operations of the Corporation will be much more consistent with the traditional community banking activities as described earlier.~~originations.

Investment services operations primarily consist of selling alternative investment products such as annuities and mutual funds to the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s depositors. Investment services and trustee services contribute a very small percentage of gross revenue.

Provident Financial Corp performs trustee services for the ~~Bank's~~Bank’s real estate secured loan transactions and has in the past held, and may in the future hold, real estate for investment.

There are a number of risks associated with the business activities of the Corporation, many of which are beyond the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s control, including: changes in accounting principles, laws, regulation, interest rates and the economy, among others. The Corporation attempts to mitigate many of these risks through prudent banking practices, such as interest rate risk management, credit risk management, operational risk management, and liquidity risk management. The California economic environment presents heightened risk for the Corporation primarily with respect to real estate values and loan delinquencies. Since the majority of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s loans are secured by real estate located within California, significant declines in the value of California real estate may also inhibit the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s ability to recover on defaulted loans by selling the underlying real estate.

COVID-19 Impact to the Corporation

The Corporation is actively monitoring and responding to the effects of the rapidly-changing COVID-19 pandemic. The health, safety and well-being of our customers, employees and communities are the Corporation’s top priorities. Centers of Disease Control (“CDC”) guidelines, as well as directives from federal, state, county and local officials, are being closely followed to make informed operational decisions.

During this unprecedented time, the Corporation is working diligently with its employees to implement CDC-advised health, hygiene and social distancing practices. To avoid service disruptions, most of our employees currently work from the Corporation’s premises and promote social distancing standards. To date, there have been no service disruptions. The Corporation’s Employee Assistance Program is provided at no cost for employees and family members seeking counseling services for mental health and emotional support needs. The Corporation also adheres to the Families First Coronavirus Response Act (FFCRA), which includes the Emergency Paid Sick Leave Act and the Emergency Family and Medical Leave Expansion.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, taking care of customers and providing uninterrupted access to services are top priorities for the Corporation. All of the Corporation’s banking centers are open for business with regular business hours while implementing CDC guidelines for social distancing and enhanced cleaning. Customers can also conduct their banking business using drive throughs, the online and mobile banking services, ATMs, and telephone banking.

On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was signed into law. Among other things, the CARES Act provides relief to borrowers, including the opportunity to defer loan payments while not negatively affecting their credit standing. For commercial and consumer customers, the Corporation has provided relief options, including payment deferrals and fee waivers.

All loans modified due to COVID-19 will be separately monitored and any request for continuation of relief beyond the initial modification will be reassessed at that time to determine if a further modification should be granted and if a downgrade in risk rating is appropriate.

As of April 30, 2020, the Corporation has processed and deemed eligible approximately 27 single-family forbearance requests, totaling $12.9 million or 1.4 percent of total loans, and approximately four multi-family, commercial real estate, and business loan requests, totaling $4.3 million or 0.6 percent of total loans.

After the payment deferral period, normal loan payments will once again become due and payable. The forbearance amount will be due and payable in full as a balloon payment at the end of the loan term or sooner if the loan becomes due and payable in full at an earlier date. We believe the steps we are taking are necessary to effectively manage our portfolio and assist our clients through the ongoing uncertainty surrounding the duration, impact and government response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

For customers that may need access to funds in their certificates of deposit to assist with living expenses during the COVID-19 pandemic, the Corporation is waiving early withdrawal penalties on a case by case basis. Overdraft and other fees are also waived on a case-by-case basis. We are cautious when paying overdrafts beyond the client's total deposit relationship, overdraft protection options or their overdraft coverage limits.

The Corporation anticipates that the COVID-19 pandemic will continue to impact our business in future periods in one or more of the following ways, among others:

◾	Higher provisions for certain commercial real estate loans may be incurred, especially to borrowers with tenants in industries, such as hospitality, travel, food service and restaurants and bars, and businesses providing physical services;

◾	Significantly lower market interest rates which may have a negative impact on variable rate loans indexed to LIBOR, U.S. treasury and prime indices and on deposit pricing, as interest rate adjustments typically lag the effect on the yield

earned on interest-earning assets because rates on many deposit accounts are decision-based, not tied to a specific market-based index, and are based on competition for deposits;

◾	Certain additional fees for deposit and loan products may be waived or reduced;

◾	Non-interest income may decline due to a decrease in fees earned as spending by debit card customers complying with “Stay at Home” requirements and who otherwise may be adversely affected by reductions in their personal income or job losses;

◾	Non-interest expenses related to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic may increase, including cleaning costs, supplies, equipment and other items; and

◾	Additional loan forbearance or modifications may occur and borrowers may default on their loans, which may necessitate further increases to the allowance for loan losses.

While the full impact of COVID-19 on the Corporation's future financial results is uncertain and not currently estimable, the Corporation believes that the impact could be materially adverse to our financial condition and results of operations depending on the length and severity of the economic downturn brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic.

Off-Balance Sheet Financing Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

Commitments and Derivative Financial Instruments. The Corporation is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, in the form of originating loans or providing funds under existing lines of credit, loan sale agreements to third parties and option contracts. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest-rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s exposure to credit loss, in the event of non-performance by the counterparty to these financial instruments, is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments. The Corporation uses the same credit policies in entering into financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. For a discussion on commitments and derivative financial instruments, see ~~Note 7~~Notes 6 and 10 of the Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Contractual Obligations. The following table summarizes the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s contractual obligations at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and the effect these obligations are expected to have on the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s liquidity and cash flows in future periods:

	Payments Due by Period
(In Thousands)	Less than 1 year		1 to less than 3 years		3 to 5 years		Over 5 years		Total
Operating obligations	$	1,780	$	2,870	$	567	$	110	$	5,327
Pension benefits	259		517		518		6,150		7,444
Time deposits	102,955		64,455		20,394		807		188,611
FHLB – San Francisco advances	22,964		54,794		51,577		10,046		139,381
FHLB – San Francisco letter of credit	10,000		—		—		—		10,000
FHLB – San Francisco MPF credit enhancement ⁽¹⁾	—		—		—		2,458		2,458
Total	$	137,958	$	122,636	$	73,056	$	19,571	$	353,221

Payments Due by Period
(In Thousands)
Less than
1 year

1 to less
than 3
years

3 to
5 years

Over
5 years
Total
Operating obligations $ 2,683 $ 3,744 $ 1,118 $ 570 $ 8,115
Pension benefits 253 505 505 6,282 7,545
Time deposits 117,104 72,065 23,725 719 213,613
FHLB – San Francisco advances 2,646 45,313 42,494 20,565 111,018
FHLB – San Francisco letter of credit 10,000 — — — 10,000
FHLB – San Francisco MPF credit enhancement ⁽¹⁾
— — — 2,458 2,458
Total $ 132,686 $ 121,627 $ 67,842 $ 30,594 $ 352,749

⁽¹⁾

Represents the potential ~~future~~maximum potential recourse obligation for loans previously sold by the Bank to the FHLB – San Francisco under its Mortgage Partnership Finance ~~("MPF"~~(“MPF”) program. As of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Bank serviced ~~$10.4~~$7.9 million of loans under this program. The estimated amounts by period are based on historical loss experience.

The expected obligation for time deposits and FHLB – San Francisco advances include anticipated interest accruals based on the respective contractual terms.

Comparison of Financial Condition at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018~~2019

Total assets ~~decreased $56.2~~increased $22.7 million, or ~~five~~two percent, to ~~$1.12~~$1.11 billion at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$1.18~~$1.08 billion at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily attributable to ~~decreases~~increases in loans held for investment and ~~loans held for sale, partly offset by increases in~~ cash and cash equivalents, ~~and~~partly offset by a decrease in investment securities.

Total cash and cash equivalents, primarily excess cash deposited with the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, increased ~~$18.2~~$13.6 million, or 4219 percent, to ~~$61.5~~$84.3 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$43.3~~$70.6 million at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The increase in the total cash and cash equivalents was primarily attributable to the ~~decreases~~pay downs of investment securities and the increase in borrowings, partly offset by the utilization of cash to fund the increase in loans held for ~~sale and loans held for investment, partly offset by the increase in investment securities and the payoff of borrowings and time deposits that matured during the first nine months of fiscal 2019.~~investment.

Investment securities (held to maturity and available for sale) ~~increased $13.5~~decreased $25.7 million, or 1426 percent, to ~~$108.8~~$74.3 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$95.3~~$100.1 million at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily the result of ~~investment security purchases, partly offset by~~ scheduled and accelerated principal payments on mortgage-backed securities during the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019.~~2020. For further analysis on investment securities, see Note 54 of the Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.

Loans held for investment ~~decreased $19.1~~increased $34.4 million, or ~~two~~four percent, to ~~$883.6~~$914.3 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$902.7~~$879.9 million at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, primarily due to a ~~$26.2 million decline in multi-family loans, partly offset by a $5.6~~$36.9 million increase in ~~commercial real estate~~multi-family loans. During the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, the Corporation originated ~~$93.8~~$88.3 million of loans held for investment, consisting primarily of ~~single-family,~~ multi-family and ~~commercial real estate~~single-family loans and also purchased ~~$26.2~~$115.6 million inof single-family ~~multi-family~~ and ~~commercial real estate~~multi-family loans held for ~~investment.~~investment that are located throughout California. Total loan principal payments during the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 were ~~$140.5~~$171.7 million, ~~down two~~up 22 percent from ~~$143.9~~$140.5 million during the comparable period in fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The single-family loans held for investment balance ~~was essentially unchanged~~ at ~~$314.8 million at both~~ March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018,~~2019 was $326.7 million and $325.0 million, respectively, and represented approximately 36 percent and 3537 percent of loans held for investment, respectively.

The tables below describe the geographic dispersion of gross real estate secured loans held for investment at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, as a percentage of the total dollar amount outstanding:

As of March 31, ~~2019~~2020:

	Inland Empire				Southern California⁽¹⁾				Other California				Other States				Total
Loan Category	Balance		%		Balance		%		Balance		%		Balance		%		Balance		%
Single-family	$	88,682	27	%	$	154,913	48	%	$	82,393	25	%	$	698	—	%	$	326,686	100	%
Multi-family	68,184		14	%	300,413		63	%	107,029		23	%	315		—	%	475,941		100	%
Commercial real estate	23,913		23	%	47,968		45	%	33,810		32	%	—		—	%	105,691		100	%
Construction	792		13	%	4,264		67	%	1,290		20	%	—		—	%	6,346		100	%
Total	$	181,571	20	%	$	507,558	55	%	$	224,522	25	%	$	1,013	—	%	$	914,664	100	%

(Dollars In Thousands)
Inland
Empire

Southern
California ⁽¹⁾

Other
California

Other
States
Total
Loan Category Balance % Balance % Balance % Balance % Balance %
Single-family $ 107,164 34 % $ 144,261 46 % $ 62,360 20 % $ 1,039 — % $ 314,824 100 %
Multi-family 71,357 16 % 275,087 61 % 103,039 23 % 329 — % 449,812 100 %
Commercial real estate 31,972 28 % 55,435 48 % 27,948 24 % — — % 115,355 100 %
Construction 295 7 % 3,397 82 % 447 11 % — — % 4,139 100 %
Other — — % — — % 167 100 % — — % 167 100 %
Total $ 210,788 24 % $ 478,1801 54 % $ 193,961 22 % $ 1,368 — % $ 884,297 100 %

⁽¹⁾	Other than the Inland Empire.

As of June 30, ~~2018~~2019:

	Inland Empire				Southern California⁽¹⁾				Other California				Other States				Total
Loan Category	Balance		%		Balance		%		Balance		%		Balance		%		Balance		%
Single-family	$	104,967	33	%	$	146,963	45	%	$	71,997	22	%	$	1,025	—	%	$	324,952	100	%
Multi-family	70,241		16	%	272,282		62	%	96,192		22	%	326		—	%	439,041		100	%
Commercial real estate	30,551		27	%	54,010		48	%	27,367		25	%	—		—	%	111,928		100	%
Construction	525		11	%	3,579		77	%	534		12	%	—		—	%	4,638		100	%
Other	—		—	%	—		—	%	167		100	%	—		—	%	167		100	%
Total	$	206,284	24	%	$	476,834	54	%	$	196,257	22	%	$	1,351	—	%	$	880,726	100	%

(Dollars In Thousands)
Inland
Empire

Southern
California ⁽¹⁾

Other
California

Other
States
Total
Loan Category Balance % Balance % Balance % Balance % Balance %
Single-family $ 110,510 35 % $ 149,261 48 % $ 53,960 17 % $ 1,077 — % $ 314,808 100 %
Multi-family 76,473 16 % 287,174 60 % 109,684 23 % 2,677 1 % 476,008 100 %
Commercial real estate 32,224 29 % 47,903 44 % 29,599 �� 27 % — — % 109,726 100 %
Construction 49 1 % 2,685 85 % 440 14 % — — % 3,174 100 %
Other — — % — — % 167 100 % — — % 167 100 %
Total $ 219,256 24 % $ 487,0231 54 % $ 193,850 21 % $ 3,754 1 % $ 903,883 100 %

⁽¹⁾	Other than the Inland Empire.

~~Loans held for sale~~Total deposits decreased ~~$65.8~~$5.4 million ~~or 68 percent,~~ to ~~$30.5~~$835.8 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$96.3~~$841.3 million at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Time deposits decreased $7.5 million, or four percent, to $185.6 million at March 31, 2020 from $193.1 million at June 30, 2019, while transaction accounts increased slightly to $650.2 million at March 31, 2020 from $648.1 million at June 30, 2019. The ~~decrease was~~percentage of time deposits to total deposits decreased to 22 percent at March 31, 2020 from 23 percent at June 30, 2019, primarily due to a ~~decrease~~managed run-off of higher cost time deposits consistent with the reduction in the Bank’s funding needs resulting from no loans originated for sale ~~attributable to the winding down of the mortgage banking operations and the timing difference between loan fundings and loan sale settlements. Total loans originated~~

~~for sale~~ during the ~~quarter ended March 31, 2019 was $110.7 million as compared to $241.6 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2018.~~first nine months of fiscal 2020.

Total ~~deposits decreased $30.7~~borrowings increased $30.0 million, or ~~three~~30 percent, to ~~$876.9~~$131.1 million at March 31, ~~2019 from $907.6~~2020 as compared to $101.1 million at June 30, ~~2018. Transaction accounts decreased $3.3 million to $666.7 million at March 31,~~ 2019, from $670.0 million at June 30, 2018, while time deposits decreased $27.4 million, or 12 percent, to $210.2 million at March 31, 2019 from $237.6 million at June 30, 2018 consistent with the Bank's strategy to decrease the percentage of time deposits in its deposit base.

~~Total borrowings decreased $25.1 million, or 20 percent, to $101.1 million at March 31, 2019 as compared to $126.2 million at June 30, 2018,~~ due to additional long-term borrowings obtained with a lower average cost during the ~~maturity~~first quarter of ~~short-term borrowings and an early payoff of a long-term borrowing.~~fiscal 2020. The borrowings were primarily comprised of long-term FHLB - San Francisco advances used for interest rate risk management purposes.

Total ~~stockholders'~~stockholders’ equity increased ~~$752,000,~~$2.5 million, or ~~one~~two percent, to ~~$121.2~~$123.2 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$120.5~~$120.6 million at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, primarily as a result of the year-to-date net income of ~~$3.6~~$6.1 million and ~~the amortization of~~ stock-based compensation ~~benefits during the first nine months~~ of ~~fiscal 2019,~~$933,000, partly offset by $3.1 million of quarterly cash dividends paid to shareholders and stock repurchases ~~from restricted~~of $1.3 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2020. The Corporation repurchased 66,041 shares of its common stock ~~recipients to fund their withholding tax obligations.~~during the nine months ended March 31, 2020 at an average cost of $19.43 per share.

Comparison of Operating Results for the ~~Quarters~~Quarter and Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018~~2019

The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s net ~~loss~~income for the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$151,000,~~$1.1 million, in contrast to ~~the~~ net ~~income~~loss of ~~$1.7 million~~$151,000 in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. Compared to the same quarter last year, the ~~decline~~increase was primarily attributable to ~~a $1.88 million decrease in the~~lower non-interest expenses (mainly from salaries and employee benefits expenses decreasing due to no saleable single-family loan originations this quarter), partly offset by lower non-interest income (mainly due to significantly lower gain on sale of ~~loans and a $484,000 increase in salaries and employee benefits expense, partly offset by the $189,000 benefit from income taxes resulting from the loss before taxes this quarter in contrast~~loans), higher provision for loan losses (mainly due to the ~~$667,000 provision~~COVID-19 pandemic) and lower net interest income. Earnings for ~~income taxes~~the quarter reflect the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic which resulted in a substantial reduction in business activity or the ~~same quarter last year (an $856,000 difference).~~closing of businesses in California.

For the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s net income was ~~$3.6~~$6.1 million, an increase of ~~$2.9~~$2.5 million, or ~~397~~68 percent, from ~~the net income of $731,000~~$3.6 million in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. Compared to the same period last year, the increase in earnings was primarily attributable to ~~(a)~~a decrease in non-interest expense, partly offset by a decrease in non-interest income in both cases reflecting the ~~one-time, non-cash, net tax charge~~scaling back of ~~$1.9 million from the net deferred tax assets revaluation required by the Tax Act consistent with the lower corporate federal income tax rate applied~~originations and sales of single-family loans and an increase in the ~~second quarter of fiscal 2018 (not replicated this fiscal year), (b) the $3.4 million litigation reserve~~provision for loan losses. The decrease in ~~the first nine months of fiscal 2018 (not replicated this fiscal year), (c)~~non-interest expense was mainly attributable to a ~~$1.8 million increase in net interest income and (d) a $1.9 million~~ decrease in salaries and employee benefits ~~expense~~expenses and ~~(e) the application of the statutory federal and state income tax rate of 29.56% this current period as compared to the blended tax rate of 35.86% in the same period last year; partly offset by~~ a ~~$5.7 million~~ decrease in ~~the gain on sale of loans.~~premises and occupancy expenses.

The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s efficiency ratio, defined as non-interest expense divided by the sum of net interest income and non-interest income, ~~increased~~improved to ~~103~~75 percent for the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from 87103 percent in the same period of fiscal ~~2018. However, for~~2019. For the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s efficiency ratio improved to 8971 percent from 9389 percent for the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019.

Return ~~(loss)~~ on average assets ~~decreased 64 basis points to (0.05)~~was 0.41 percent in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019 from 0.59~~2020, in contrast to (0.05) percent in the same period last year. ~~However for~~For the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, return on average assets was ~~0.42~~0.74 percent, up 3432 basis points from ~~0.08~~0.42 percent in the same period last year.

Return ~~(loss)~~ on average equity was ~~(0.49)~~3.70 percent in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019 as compared~~2020, in contrast to ~~5.76~~(0.49) percent in the same period last year. ~~However for~~For the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, return on average equity was ~~3.97~~6.64 percent as compared to ~~0.78~~3.97 percent for the same period last year.

Diluted earnings ~~(loss)~~ per share for the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 were ~~$(0.02), down 109 percent from $0.23~~$0.15, in contrast to diluted losses per share of $0.02 in the same period last year. ~~However for~~For the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, diluted earnings per share were ~~$0.48, up 433~~$0.80, a 67 percent increase from ~~$0.09~~$0.48 in the same period last year.

Net Interest Income:

For the Quarters Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Net interest income ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$488,000,~~$722,000, or ~~five~~eight percent, to ~~$9.6~~$8.9 million for the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019 as compared to~~2020 from $9.6 million in the same period in fiscal ~~2018,~~2019, as a result of a ~~higher~~lower net interest margin ~~partly offset by~~and, to a lesser extent, a lower average interest-earning asset balance. The net interest margin ~~increased 30~~decreased 23 basis points to ~~3.53~~3.30 percent in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~3.23~~3.53 percent in the same period of fiscal ~~2018,~~2019, primarily due to ~~an increase~~a decrease in the average yield on interest-earning ~~assets, partly offset by a slight increase in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.~~assets. The weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets ~~increased~~decreased by 3122 basis points to ~~4.09~~3.87 percent in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~3.78~~4.09 percent in the same quarter last year, ~~while~~and the weighted-average cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased by one basis point to ~~0.63~~0.64 percent for the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 as compared to ~~0.62~~0.63 percent in the same quarter last year. The ~~increase~~decrease in the average yield of interest-earning assets was primarily due to decreases in the average yield of loans receivable and interest-earning deposits, partly offset by an increase in the average yield ~~of all interest-earning assets resulting primarily from higher market interest rates, except FHLB – San Francisco stock.~~on investment securities. The average balance of interest-earning assets decreased ~~$41.4~~$11.3 million, or ~~four~~one percent, to ~~$1.09~~$1.08 billion in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$1.13~~$1.09 billion in the comparable period of fiscal ~~2018,~~2019, reflecting decreases in the average balance of investment securities and interest-earning deposits, partly offset by an increase in the average balance of loans receivable. The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities decreased by $11.1 million, or one percent, to $967.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 from $979.0 million in the same quarter last year primarily reflecting a decrease in the average balance of ~~loans receivable,~~interest-bearing deposits, partly offset by ~~increases~~an increase in the average balance of ~~investment securities~~borrowings.

Beginning in August 2019, the Federal Reserve reduced the targeted Federal Funds Rate by 25 basis points three times in 2019 and ~~interest-earning deposits.~~150 basis points during the current quarter to a range of 0.00% to 0.25% at March 31, 2020. The ~~average balance of interest-bearing liabilities decreased by $45.6 million, or four percent, to $979.0 million~~150 basis-point decrease in the ~~third quarter of fiscal 2019 from $1.02 billion~~targeted Federal Funds Rate in response to COVID-19 pandemic did not occur until late in the ~~same~~ quarter ~~last year.~~in March 2020, and the full effect of the lower interest rate environment had not yet been realized at quarter end. Furthermore, the effect of recent changes in the targeted Federal Funds Rate on the cost of funding liabilities typically lags the effect on the yield earned on interest-earning assets because rates on many deposit accounts are decision-based, not tied to a specific market-based index, and are based on competition for deposits while most interest-earning assets adjust earlier because they are tied to a specific market-based index. Because the length of the COVID-19 pandemic and the efficacy of the extraordinary measures being put in place to address its economic consequences are unknown, including the recent 150 basis point reductions in the targeted Federal Funds Rate, until the pandemic subsides, the Corporation expects its net interest income and net interest margin will be adversely affected in 2020 and possibly longer.

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Net interest income ~~increased $1.8 million,~~decreased by $689,000, or ~~seven~~two percent, to ~~$28.8~~$28.1 million for the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$27.0~~$28.8 million ~~for~~ the ~~comparable~~same period in fiscal ~~2018, due to~~2019, as a result of a lower average interest-earning asset balance, partly offset by a higher net interest margin, partly offset by a lower average interest-earning assets balance. The net interest margin was 3.45 percent in the first nine months of fiscal 2019, up 29 basis points from 3.16 percent in the same period of fiscal 2018, primarily due to an increase in the average yield on interest-earning assets, partly offset by a slight increase in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities. The net interest margin in the nine months of fiscal 2019 was augmented by $176,000 of previously unrecognized loan interest income resulting from the payoff of three non-performing loans and the $133,000 special cash dividend received on FHLB-San Francisco stock, which increased the net interest margin by approximately three basis points for the period. The weighted-average yield on interest-earning assets increased by 31 basis points to 4.03 percent, while the weighted-average cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased by two basis points to 0.64 percent for the first nine months of fiscal 2019 as compared to the same period last year.margin. The average balance of interest-earning assets decreased ~~$28.5~~$43.2 million, or ~~two~~four percent, to ~~$1.11~~$1.07 billion in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$1.14~~$1.11 billion in the comparable period of fiscal ~~2018,~~2019, primarily reflecting ~~a decrease~~decreases in the average balance of loans receivable, ~~partly offset by increases in the average balance of~~ investment securities and interest earning deposits. The average balance of interest-bearing liabilities decreased by ~~$28.9~~$42.7 million, or ~~three~~four percent, to ~~$1.00 billion~~$958.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$1.03~~$1.00 billion in the same period last ~~year.~~year primarily reflecting a decrease in the average balance of interest-bearing deposits, partly offset by an increase in the average balance of borrowings. The net interest margin was 3.51 percent in the first nine months of fiscal 2020, up six basis points from 3.45 percent in the same period of fiscal 2019, primarily due to an increase in the average yield on interest-earning assets, while the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities remained unchanged. The increase in the average yield of interest-earning assets was primarily due to increases in the average yield of investment securities and loans receivable, partly offset by decreases in the average yield on FHLB – San Francisco stock and interest-earning deposits.

Interest Income:

For the Quarters Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Total interest income ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$441,000,~~$703,000, or ~~four~~six percent, to ~~$11.1~~$10.4 million for the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 as compared to $11.1 million for the same quarter of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily due to ~~an increase~~decreases in interest income from loans receivable, investment securities and interest-earning deposits.

Interest income on loans receivable ~~increased $78,000,~~(including loans held for sale in the third quarter of fiscal 2019) decreased by $389,000, or ~~one~~four percent, to ~~$10.0~~$9.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019 as compared to~~2020 from $10.0 million in the same quarter of fiscal ~~2018. This increase~~2019. The decrease was ~~attributable~~due to a ~~higher~~lower average ~~loan~~ yield, ~~reflecting the rise in interest rates over the last year,~~ partly offset by a ~~lower~~higher average ~~loan~~ balance. The average loans receivable yield during the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019 increased 25~~2020 decreased 24 basis points to ~~4.38~~4.14 percent from ~~4.13~~4.38 percent during the same quarter last ~~year, primarily due to increases~~year. The decrease in the average yield on loans receivable was primarily attributable to loans repricing downward reflecting declines in the targeted Federal Funds Rate offset in part by the increase to $451,000 of ~~both loans held for investment~~net deferred loan costs that was recognized in interest income as a result of loan payoffs and ~~loans held for sale combined with a lower~~

~~percentage~~scheduled amortizations in the third quarter of ~~loans held for sale~~fiscal 2020 as compared to ~~total loans receivable.~~$179,000 of net deferred loan costs in the same quarter of fiscal 2019. The average balance of loans receivable ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$46.8~~$14.5 million, or ~~five~~two percent, to ~~$915.0~~$929.5 million for the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$961.8~~$915.0 million in the same quarter of fiscal ~~2018,~~2019, primarily due to a decrease in the average balance of loans held for sale attributable to the ~~winding down~~scaling back of saleable single-family mortgage loan originations, partly offset by an increase in the ~~mortgage banking operations and, to a lesser extent, a decrease in~~ average balance of loans held for investment.

~~Loans receivable is comprised of loans held for investment and loans held for sale.~~ The average balance of loans held for investment ~~decreased $13.1~~increased $54.0 million, or ~~one~~six percent, to ~~$875.5~~$929.5 million during the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$888.6~~$875.5 million in the same quarter of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The average yield on the loans held for investment ~~increased~~decreased by 2322 basis points to ~~4.36~~4.14 percent in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~4.13~~4.36 percent in the same quarter of fiscal ~~2018. The average balance of~~2019. There were no loans held for sale ~~also decreased $33.8 million, or 46 percent, to $39.5 million during~~in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 as compared to the average balance of $39.5 million with an average yield of 4.74 percent in the same quarter of fiscal 2019.

Interest income from ~~$73.3~~investment securities decreased $114,000, or 19 percent, to $478,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 from $592,000 for the same quarter of fiscal 2019. This decrease was attributable to a lower average balance, partly offset by a higher average yield. The average balance of investment securities decreased $23.3 million, or 23 percent, to $78.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 from $101.9 million in the same quarter of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The decrease in the average balance of investment securities was primarily the result of scheduled and accelerated principal payments on mortgage-backed securities. The average investment securities yield ~~on the loans held for sale~~ increased ~~by 61~~11 basis points to ~~4.74~~2.43 percent in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~4.13~~2.32 percent in the same quarter of fiscal ~~2018.~~

Interest income from investment securities increased $210,000, or 55 percent, to $592,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 from $382,000 for the same quarter of fiscal 2018. This increase was primarily attributable to a higher average yield. The average investment securities yield increased 78 basis points to 2.32 percent in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 from 1.54 percent in the same quarter of fiscal 2018.2019. The increase in the average investment securities yield was primarily attributable to a lower premium amortization between the ~~purchases of investment securities which had higher average yields than~~quarters ($99,000 vs. $181,000), partly offset by the ~~existing portfolio and the~~downward repricing of adjustable mortgage-backed securities to higher interest rates, partly offset by accelerated amortization of purchase premiums resulting from accelerated principal payments. The average balance of investment securities increased $2.5 million, or three percent, to $101.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 from $99.4 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2018. The increase in the average balance of investment securities was primarily the result of purchases of mortgage-backed securities, partly offset by scheduled and accelerated principal payments on mortgage-backed securities.

The FHLB – San Francisco cash dividend received in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 was $144,000, unchanged from the same quarter of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The average balance of FHLB – San Francisco stock in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019 increased $91,000, or one percent, to~~2020 remained unchanged at $8.2 million ~~from $8.1 million in~~as compared to the same quarter of fiscal ~~2018, attributable to a required stock purchase due to reduced borrowings of $91,000 in April 2018. As a result,~~2019 and the average yield ~~decreased to~~also remained unchanged at 7.03 percent in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 as compared to ~~7.10 percent in~~ the ~~comparable~~same quarter last year.

Interest income from interest-earning deposits, primarily cash deposited at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, was ~~$386,000~~$186,000 in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019, up 66~~2020, down 52 percent from ~~$233,000~~$386,000 in the same quarter of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily due to a ~~higher~~lower average ~~yield.~~yield and, to a lesser extent, a lower average balance. The average yield earned on interest-earning deposits ~~increased 89~~decreased 120 basis points to ~~2.40~~1.20 percent in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~1.51~~2.40 percent in the comparable quarter last year, due primarily to ~~the increases~~decreases in the targeted ~~federal funds rate~~Federal Funds Rate over ~~the~~ last year. The average balance of the interest-earning deposits in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$64.4~~$61.9 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$2.8~~$2.5 million or ~~five~~four percent, from ~~$61.6~~$64.4 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2018. The increase in the average balance of interest-earning deposits was primarily due to the decreases in loans held for investment and loans held for sale, partly offset by an increase in investment securities and decreases in deposits and borrowings.2019.

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Total interest income ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$1.8 million,~~$844,000, or ~~six~~three percent, to ~~$33.6~~$32.7 million for the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$31.8~~$33.6 million in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily due to decreases in interest income from loans receivable, interest-earning deposits and cash dividends received from FHLB – San Francisco stock, partly offset by an increase in interest income from ~~all interest-earning assets.~~investment securities.

Loans receivable interest income ~~increased $691,000,~~(including loans held for sale in the first nine months of fiscal 2019) decreased $499,000, or two percent, to ~~$30.5~~$30.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$29.8~~$30.5 million for the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~increase~~decrease was attributable to a ~~higher~~lower average loan ~~yield reflecting the rise in interest rates over the last year,~~balance, partly offset by a ~~lower~~higher average loan ~~balance~~yield in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 in comparison to the same period last year. The average balance of loans receivable decreased $19.1 million, or two percent, to $922.2 million for the first nine months of fiscal 2020 from $941.3 million in the same period of fiscal 2019. The average loan yield ~~including loans held for sale,~~ during the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 increased 29two basis points to ~~4.32~~4.34 percent from ~~4.03~~4.32 percent in the same period last year. The increase in the average ~~balance of~~

yield on loans receivable ~~including loans held for sale, decreased $45.7 million, or five percent,~~was primarily attributable to ~~$941.3 million for~~$623,000 of net deferred loan costs that were recognized in interest income as a result of loan payoffs and scheduled amortization and $48,000 of deferred interest payments that was recognized from one non-performing loan that was paid off in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 as compared to $823,000 of net deferred loan costs that were recognized in interest income as a result of loan payoffs and scheduled amortization and $176,000 of deferred interest payments that were recognized from ~~$987.0 million~~three non-performing loans that were paid off in the same period ~~of fiscal 2018.~~last year.

~~Loans receivable is comprised of loans held for investment and loans held for sale.~~ The average balance of loans held for investment ~~decreased $13.3~~increased $39.9 million, or ~~one~~five percent, to ~~$882.3~~$922.2 million during the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$895.6~~$882.3 million in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The average yield on the loans held for investment increased by 26four basis points to ~~4.30~~4.34 percent in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~4.04~~4.30 percent in the same period of fiscal ~~2018. The average balance of~~2019. There were no loans held for sale decreased by $32.4 million, or 35 percent, to $59.0 million during the first nine months of fiscal 2019 from $91.4 million in the same period of fiscal 2018. The average yield on the loans held for sale increased by 74 basis points to 4.71 percent in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019 from 3.97~~2020 as compared to the average balance of $59.0 million with an average yield of 4.71 percent in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019.

Interest income from investment securities increased ~~$423,000,~~$278,000, or 4420 percent, to ~~$1.4~~$1.7 million in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$958,000~~$1.4 million for the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. This increase was attributable to a higher average yield, ~~and, to~~partly offset by a ~~lesser extent, a higher~~lower average balance. The average investment securities yield increased 4760 basis points to ~~1.93~~2.53 percent in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~1.46~~1.93 percent in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The increase in the average investment securities yield was primarily attributable to a lower premium amortization between the periods ($326,000 vs. $692,000) and purchases of investment securities during the last 12 months which had higher average yields than the existing portfolio and the repricing of adjustable rate mortgage-backed securities to higher interest rates, partly offset by accelerated amortization of purchase premiums resulting from accelerated principal payments.portfolio. The average balance of investment securities ~~increased $7.8~~decreased $8.2 million, or nine percent, to ~~$95.5~~$87.3 million in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$87.7~~$95.5 million in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~increase~~decrease in the average balance of investment securities was primarily the result of ~~purchases of mortgage-backed securities, partly offset by~~ scheduled and accelerated principal payments on mortgage-backed securities, partly offset by purchases of mortgage-backed securities.

The FHLB – San Francisco cash dividend received in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$565,000, up 32~~$432,000, down 24 percent from ~~$428,000~~$565,000 in the same period of fiscal ~~2018,~~2019, primarily attributable to a special cash dividend of $133,000 received in ~~December 2018.~~the first nine months of fiscal 2019 and not replicated in the same period of fiscal 2020. As a result, the average yield ~~increased~~decreased to ~~9.19~~7.03 percent in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 as compared to ~~7.04~~9.19 percent in the comparable period last year.

Interest income from interest-earning deposits, primarily cash deposited at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, was ~~$1.1 million~~$621,000 in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019, up 88~~2020, down 44 percent from ~~$591,000~~$1.1 million in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~increase~~decrease was due to a ~~higher~~lower average yield and, to a lesser extent, a ~~higher~~lower average balance in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 as compared to the same period last year. The average yield ~~increased 84~~decreased 59 basis points to ~~2.20~~1.61 percent in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~1.36~~2.20 percent in the comparable period last year, due primarily to the ~~increases~~decreases in the targeted ~~federal funds rate~~Federal Funds Rate over ~~the~~ last year. The average balance of the interest-earning deposits in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$66.5~~$50.6 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$9.2~~$15.9 million or 1624 percent, from ~~$57.3~~$66.5 million in the same period of fiscal 2018. The increase in average balance of interest-earning deposits was primarily due to the decreases in loans held for investment and loans held for sale, partly offset by an increase in investment securities and a decrease in deposits.2019.

Interest Expense:

For the Quarters Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Total interest expense ~~decreased $47,000, or three percent to~~remained virtually unchanged at $1.5 million, inincreasing $19,000 for the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019 from $1.6 million in~~2020 as compared to the ~~comparable~~same quarter ~~of fiscal 2018.~~last year. This ~~decrease~~increase was attributable to higher borrowing expense, partly offset by lower ~~interest expenses on both deposits and borrowings.~~deposit expense.

Interest expense on deposits for the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$841,000~~$746,000 as compared to ~~$856,000~~$841,000 for the same period last year, a decrease of ~~$15,000,~~$95,000, or ~~two~~11 percent. The decrease in interest expense on deposits was ~~primarily~~ attributable to a lower average balance ~~partly offset by~~and a slightly ~~higher~~lower average cost of deposits. The average balance of deposits decreased ~~$38.7~~$36.4 million, or four percent, to ~~$873.3~~$836.9 million during the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$912.0 million during the same period last year. The decrease in the average balance was primarily attributable to decreases in time deposits and, to a lesser extent,~~

savings deposits, partly offset by an increase in checking and money market deposits. The average cost of deposits remained relatively stable, increasing only one basis point to 0.39 percent during the third quarter of fiscal 2019 from 0.38 percent during the same quarter last year. The increase in the average cost of deposits was attributable primarily to a higher average cost of time deposits, partly offset by a lower percentage of time deposits to the total deposit balance. Strategically, the Corporation has been promoting transaction accounts and competing less aggressively for time deposits. The average balance of transaction accounts to total deposits in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 was 75 percent, compared to 73 percent in the same period of fiscal 2018.

Interest expense on borrowings, consisting of FHLB – San Francisco advances, for the third quarter of fiscal 2019 decreased $32,000, or four percent, to $680,000 from $712,000 for the same period last year. The decrease in interest expense on borrowings was the result of a lower average balance, partly offset by a higher average cost. The average balance of borrowings decreased $6.8 million, or six percent, to $105.8 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2019 from $112.6 million during the same period last year, primarily due to the $10.0 million prepayment of long-term borrowings in February 2019. The average cost of borrowings increased five basis points to 2.61 percent for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 from 2.56 percent in the same quarter last year. The increase in the average cost of borrowings was primarily due to the prepayment of long-term borrowings with a lower interest rate in than the weighted average interest rate of all borrowings.

~~For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.~~ Total interest expense for the first nine months of fiscal 2019 decreased $36,000, or one percent, to $4.8 million as compared to the same period last year. This decrease was attributable to lower interest expenses on both, deposits and borrowings.

Interest expense on deposits for the first nine months of fiscal 2019 decreased $18,000, or one percent, to $2.6 million as compared to the same period last year. The slight decrease in interest expense on deposits was primarily attributable to a lower average balance, partly offset by a higher average cost of deposits. The average balance of deposits decreased $28.4 million, or three percent, to $888.7 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2019 from $917.1$873.3 million during the same period last year. The decrease in the average balance was primarily attributable to decreases in time deposits and, to a lesser extent, savings deposits, partly offset by an increase in checking and money market deposits. The average cost of deposits ~~increased one~~improved, decreasing by three basis ~~point~~points to 0.36 percent during the third quarter of fiscal 2020 from 0.39 percent during the ~~first nine months of fiscal 2019 from 0.38 percent during the~~ same ~~period~~quarter last year. The ~~increase~~decrease in the average cost of deposits was attributable primarily to a ~~higher~~lower percentage of time deposits to the total deposit balance and a two basis-point decrease in the average cost of time deposits. Strategically, the Corporation has been promoting transaction accounts and competing less aggressively for time deposits. The average balance of transaction accounts to total deposits in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 was 78 percent, compared to 75 percent in the same period of fiscal 2019.

Interest expense on borrowings, consisting primarily of FHLB – San Francisco advances, for the third quarter of fiscal 2020 increased $114,000, or 17 percent, to $794,000 from $680,000 for the same period last year. The increase in interest expense on borrowings was the result of a higher average balance, partly offset by a lower average cost. The average balance of borrowings increased $25.3 million, or 24 percent, to $131.1 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2020 from $105.8 million during the same period last year. The average cost of borrowings decreased 17 basis points to 2.44 percent for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 from 2.61 percent in the same quarter last year. The decrease in the average cost of borrowings was primarily due to new long-term borrowings obtained during the first quarter of fiscal 2020 with a lower interest rate than the weighted average interest rate of all other borrowings.

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. Total interest expense decreased $155,000, or three percent, to $4.6 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2020 from $4.8 million in the same period last year. This decrease was attributable primarily to lower deposit expense, partly offset by higher borrowing expense.

Interest expense on deposits for the first nine months of fiscal 2020 was $2.3 million as compared to $2.6 million in the same period last year, a decrease of $315,000 or 12 percent. The decrease in interest expense on deposits was primarily attributable to a lower average balance and, to a lesser extent, a lower average cost of deposits. The average balance of deposits decreased $54.9 million, or six percent, to $833.7 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2020 from $888.7 million during the same period last year. The decrease in the average balance was primarily attributable to a decrease in time deposits and, to a

lesser extent, savings deposits, partly offset by an increase in checking and money market deposits. The average cost of deposits decreased two basis points to 0.37 percent during the first nine months of fiscal 2020 from 0.39 percent during the same period last year. The decrease in the average cost of deposits was attributable primarily to a lower percentage of time deposits to the total deposit ~~balance.~~balance, partly offset by a two basis-point increase in the average cost of time deposits. The average balance of transaction accounts to total deposits in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 was 7478 percent, compared to 7274 percent in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019.

Interest expense on borrowings, consisting primarily of FHLB – San Francisco advances, for the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019 decreased $18,000,~~2020 increased $160,000, or ~~one~~seven percent, to $2.3 million from $2.2 million ~~as compared to~~in the same period last year. The ~~decrease~~increase in interest expense on borrowings was the result of a ~~lower~~higher average ~~cost and to a lesser extent,~~balance, partly offset by a lower average ~~balance.~~cost. The average balance of borrowings increased by $12.2 million, or 11 percent, to $124.6 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2020 from $112.4 million during the same period last year, primarily due to the new long-term borrowings during the first quarter of fiscal 2020 at a lower average cost. The average cost of borrowings decreased ~~one~~eight basis ~~point~~points to ~~2.56~~2.48 percent for the nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~2.57~~2.56 percent in the same period last year. ~~The average balance of borrowings decreased by $403,000 to $112.4 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2019 from $112.8 million during the same period last year.~~

The following tables present the average balance sheets for the ~~quarters~~quarter and nine months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ respectively:

Average Balance Sheets

	Quarter Ended March 31, 2020						Quarter Ended March 31, 2019
(Dollars In Thousands)	Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Cost		Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Cost
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net ⁽¹⁾	$	929,485	$	9,622	4.14	%	$	915,049	$	10,011	4.38	%
Investment securities	78,632		478		2.43	%	101,851		592		2.32	%
FHLB – San Francisco stock	8,199		144		7.03	%	8,199		144		7.03	%
Interest-earning deposits	61,900		186		1.20	%	64,390		386		2.40	%

Total interest-earning assets	1,078,216		10,430		3.87	%	1,089,489		11,133		4.09	%

Non interest-earning assets	31,942						30,228

Total assets	$	1,110,158					$	1,119,717

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking and money market accounts ⁽²⁾	$	391,458	$	106	0.11	%	$	382,294	$	102	0.11	%
Savings accounts	260,124		131		0.20	%	274,400		139		0.21	%
Time deposits	185,273		509		1.10	%	216,558		600		1.12	%

Total deposits	836,855		746		0.36	%	873,252		841		0.39	%

Borrowings	131,075		794		2.44	%	105,793		680		2.61	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities	967,930		1,540		0.64	%	979,045		1,521		0.63	%

Non interest-bearing liabilities	18,442						17,991

Total liabilities	986,372						997,036

Stockholders’ equity	123,786						122,681
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,110,158					$	1,119,717

Net interest income			$	8,890					$	9,612

Interest rate spread ⁽³⁾					3.23	%					3.46	%
Net interest margin ⁽⁴⁾					3.30	%					3.53	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities					111.39	%					111.28	%
Return (loss) on average assets					0.41	%					(0.05)	%
Return (loss) on average equity					3.70	%					(0.49)	%

Quarter Ended
March 31, 2019

Quarter Ended
March 31, 2018

(Dollars In Thousands)
Average
Balance
Interest
Yield/
Cost

Average
Balance
Interest
Yield/
Cost

Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net ⁽¹⁾
$ 915,049 $ 10,011 4.38 % $ 961,826 $ 9,933 4.13 %
Investment securities 101,851 592 2.32 % 99,390 382 1.54 %
FHLB – San Francisco stock 8,199 144 7.03 % 8,108 144 7.10 %
Interest-earning deposits 64,390 386 2.40 % 61,591 233 1.51 %

Total interest-earning assets 1,089,489 11,133 4.09 % 1,130,915 10,692 3.78 %

Non interest-earning assets 30,228 34,820

Total assets $ 1,119,717 $ 1,165,735

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking and money market accounts ⁽²⁾
$ 382,294 $ 102 0.11 % $ 370,346 $ 96 0.11 %
Savings accounts 274,400 139 0.21 % 293,579 147 0.20 %
Time deposits 216,558 600 1.12 % 248,104 613 1.00 %

Total deposits 873,252 841 0.39 % 912,029 856 0.38 %

Borrowings 105,793 680 2.61 % 112,625 712 2.56 %

Total interest-bearing liabilities 979,045 1,521 0.63 % 1,024,654 1,568 0.62 %

Non interest-bearing liabilities 17,991 20,804

Total liabilities 997,036 1,045,458

Stockholders' equity 122,681 120,277
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 1,119,717 $ 1,165,735

Net interest income $ 9,612 $ 9,124

Interest rate spread ⁽³⁾
3.46 % 3.16 %
Net interest margin ⁽⁴⁾
3.53 % 3.23 %
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to
average interest-bearing liabilities
111.28 % 110.37 %
Return (loss) on average assets (0.05 )% 0.59 %
Return (loss) on average equity (0.49 )% 5.76 %

⁽¹⁾

Includes loans held for sale foe the quarter ended March 31, 2019 and non-performing loans, as well as net deferred loan cost amortization of ~~$179~~$451 and ~~$120~~$179 for the ~~quarters~~quarter ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The average balance of loans held for sale was $0 and ~~2018,~~$39.5 million during the quarter ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

⁽²⁾	Includes the average balance of non interest-bearing checking accounts of ~~$83.1~~$85.6 million and ~~$78.9~~$83.1 million during the ~~quarters~~quarter ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

⁽³⁾	Represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on all interest-earning assets and the weighted-average rate on all interest-bearing liabilities.

⁽⁴⁾	Represents net interest income before provision (recovery) for loan losses as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2020						Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019
(Dollars In Thousands)	Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Cost		Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Cost
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net ⁽¹⁾	$	922,246	$	30,017	4.34	%	$	941,336	$	30,516	4.32	%
Investment securities	87,260		1,659		2.53	%	95,494		1,381		1.93	%
FHLB – San Francisco stock	8,199		432		7.03	%	8,199		565		9.19	%
Interest-earning deposits	50,642		621		1.61	%	66,498		1,111		2.20	%

Total interest-earning assets	1,068,347		32,729		4.08	%	1,111,527		33,573		4.03	%

Non interest-earning assets	31,815						30,711

Total assets	$	1,100,162					$	1,142,238

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking and money market accounts ⁽²⁾	$	387,017	$	333	0.11	%	$	379,882	$	327	0.11	%
Savings accounts	259,143		396		0.20	%	281,814		437		0.21	%
Time deposits	187,571		1,571		1.11	%	226,978		1,851		1.09	%

Total deposits	833,731		2,300		0.37	%	888,674		2,615		0.39	%

Borrowings	124,577		2,318		2.48	%	112,363		2,158		2.56	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities	958,308		4,618		0.64	%	1,001,037		4,773		0.64	%

Non interest-bearing liabilities	19,262						19,306

Total liabilities	977,570						1,020,343

Stockholders’ equity	122,592						121,895
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	1,100,162					$	1,142,238

Net interest income			$	28,111					$	28,800

Interest rate spread ⁽³⁾					3.44	%					3.39	%
Net interest margin ⁽⁴⁾					3.51	%					3.45	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities					111.48	%					111.04	%
Return on average assets					0.74	%					0.42	%
Return on average equity					6.64	%					3.97	%

Nine Months Ended
March 31, 2019

Nine Months Ended
March 31, 2018

(Dollars In Thousands)
Average
Balance
Interest
Yield/
Cost

Average
Balance
Interest
Yield/
Cost

Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net ⁽¹⁾
$ 941,336 $ 30,516 4.32 % $ 986,952 $ 29,825 4.03 %
Investment securities 95,494 1,381 1.93 % 87,710 958 1.46 %
FHLB – San Francisco stock 8,199 565 9.19 % 8,108 428 7.04 %
Interest-earning deposits 66,498 1,111 2.20 % 57,254 591 1.36 %

Total interest-earning assets 1,111,527 33,573 4.03 % 1,140,024 31,802 3.72 %

Non interest-earning assets 30,711 33,240

Total assets $ 1,142,238 $ 1,173,264

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking and money market accounts ⁽²⁾
$ 379,882 $ 327 0.11 % $ 372,413 $ 311 0.11 %
Savings accounts 281,814 437 0.21 % 290,065 445 0.20 %
Time deposits 226,978 1,851 1.09 % 254,653 1,877 0.98 %

Total deposits 888,674 2,615 0.39 % 917,131 2,633 0.38 %

Borrowings 112,363 2,158 2.56 % 112,766 2,176 2.57 %

Total interest-bearing liabilities 1,001,037 4,773 0.64 % 1,029,897 4,809 0.62 %

Non interest-bearing liabilities 19,306 19,174

Total liabilities 1,020,343 1,049,071

Stockholders' equity 121,895 124,193
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 1,142,238 $ 1,173,264

Net interest income $ 28,800 $ 26,993

Interest rate spread ⁽³⁾
3.39 % 3.10 %
Net interest margin ⁽⁴⁾
3.45 % 3.16 %
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to
average interest-bearing liabilities
111.04 % 110.69 %
Return on average assets 0.42 % 0.08 %
Return on average equity 3.97 % 0.78 %

⁽¹⁾

Includes loans held for sale for the nine months ended March 31, 2019 and non-performing loans, as well as net deferred loan cost amortization of ~~$823~~$623 and ~~$736~~$823 for the nine months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. The average balance of loans held for sale was $0 and ~~2018,~~$59.0 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

⁽²⁾	Includes the average balance of non interest-bearing checking accounts of ~~$82.7~~$83.7 million and ~~$79.1~~$82.7 million during the nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

⁽³⁾	Represents the difference between the weighted-average yield on all interest-earning assets and the weighted-average rate on all interest-bearing liabilities.

⁽⁴⁾	Represents net interest income before provision (recovery) for loan losses as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.

The following tables set forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on interest income and expense for the ~~quarters~~quarter and nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. Information is provided with respect to the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate), the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume) and the effects attributable to changes that cannot be allocated between rate and volume.

Rate/Volume Variance

	Quarter Ended March 31, 2020 Compared To Quarter Ended March 31, 2019 Increase (Decrease) Due to
(In Thousands)	Rate			Volume			Rate/ Volume			Net
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable ⁽¹⁾	$	(538	)	$	158		$	(9	)	$	(389	)
Investment securities	27			(135		)	(6		)	(114		)
FHLB – San Francisco stock	—			—			—			—
Interest-earning deposits	(192		)	(15		)	7			(200		)
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets	(703		)	8			(8		)	(703		)

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking and money market accounts	—			4			—			4
Savings accounts	(7		)	(1		)	—			(8		)
Time deposits	(6		)	(87		)	2			(91		)
Borrowings	(40		)	165			(11		)	114
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities	(53		)	81			(9		)	19
Net (decrease) increase in net interest income	$	(650	)	$	(73	)	$	1		$	(722	)

Quarter Ended March 31, 2019 Compared
To Quarter Ended March 31, 2018
Increase (Decrease) Due to

(In Thousands) Rate Volume
Rate/
Volume
Net
Interest-earning assets:
     Loans receivable ⁽¹⁾
$ 590 $ (483 ) $ (29 ) $ 78
     Investment securities 196 9 5 210
     FHLB – San Francisco stock (2 ) 2 — —
     Interest-earning deposits 136 11 6 153
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets 920 (461 ) (18 ) 441

Interest-bearing liabilities:
     Checking and money market accounts — 6 — 6
     Savings accounts 1 (9 ) — (8 )
     Time deposits 74 (78 ) (9 ) (13 )
     Borrowings 12 (43 ) (1 ) (32 )
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities 87 (124 ) (10 ) (47 )
Net increase (decrease) in net interest income $ 833 $ (337 ) $ (8 ) $ 488

⁽¹⁾	Includes loans held for sale for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 and non-performing loans. For purposes of calculating volume, rate and rate/volume variances, non-performing loans were included in the weighted-average balance outstanding.

Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019 Compared
To Nine Months Ended March 31, 2018
Increase (Decrease) Due to

(In Thousands) Rate Volume
Rate/
Volume
Net
Interest-earning assets:
     Loans receivable ⁽¹⁾
$ 2,169 $ (1,379 ) $ (99 ) $ 691
     Investment securities 311 85 27 423
     FHLB – San Francisco stock 131 5 1 137
     Interest-bearing deposits 368 94 58 520
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets 2,979 (1,195 ) (13 ) 1,771

Interest-bearing liabilities:
     Checking and money market accounts — 16 — 16
     Savings accounts 5 (12 ) (1 ) (8 )
     Time deposits 201 (204 ) (23 ) (26 )
     Borrowings (10 ) (8 ) — (18 )
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities 196 (208 ) (24 ) (36 )
Net increase (decrease) in net interest income $ 2,783 $ (987 ) $ 11 $ 1,807

	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2020 Compared To Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019 Increase (Decrease) Due to
(In Thousands)	Rate			Volume			Rate/ Volume			Net
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable ⁽¹⁾	$	123		$	(619	)	$	(3	)	$	(499	)
Investment securities	434			(119		)	(37		)	278
FHLB – San Francisco stock	(133		)	—			—			(133		)
Interest-bearing deposits	(298		)	(262		)	70			(490		)
Total net change in income on interest-earning assets	126			(1,000		)	30			(844		)

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking and money market accounts	—			6			—			6
Savings accounts	(7		)	(36		)	2			(41		)
Time deposits	34			(308		)	(6		)	(280		)
Borrowings	(69		)	236			(7		)	160
Total net change in expense on interest-bearing liabilities	(42		)	(102		)	(11		)	(155		)
Net increase (decrease) in net interest income	$	168		$	(898	)	$	41		$	(689	)

⁽¹⁾	Includes loans held for sale for the nine months ended March 31, 2019 and non-performing loans. For purposes of calculating volume, rate and rate/volume variances, non-performing loans were included in the weighted-average balance outstanding.

Provision (Recovery) for Loan Losses:

For the Quarters Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. During the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, the Corporation recorded a provision for loan losses of ~~$4,000, in contrast~~$874,000, as compared to a ~~recovery from the allowance for loan losses~~provision of ~~$505,000~~$4,000 in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~recovery from the~~increase in provision for loan losses during this quarter was primarily attributable to a qualitative component established in our allowance for loan losses ~~during the same quarter last year was primarily attributable~~methodology in response to the ~~improving risk profile~~deteriorating economic conditions and probable loan losses driven by the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the ~~loan portfolio as reflected in the asset quality ratios~~U.S. and ~~loan balances shifting to lower risk categories from higher risk categories.~~global economies. Non-performing loans, net of the allowance for loan losses and fair value adjustments ~~remained relatively unchanged at $6.1 million at both March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2018 but lower than the $6.8~~decreased 42 percent to $3.6 million at March 31, ~~2018.~~2020 from $6.2 million at June 30, 2019 and $6.1 million at March 31, 2019. Net loan recoveries in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 were $15,000 or 0.01 percent (annualized) of average loans receivable, ~~compared to net loan charge offs of $39,000 or 0.02 percent (annualized) of average loans receivable in~~unchanged from the same quarter of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. Total classified loans, net of the allowance for loan losses and fair value adjustments, were $15.1 million at March 31, 2020 as compared to $16.2 million at June 30, 2019 and $14.8 million at March 31, ~~2019 as compared to $14.9 million at June 30, 2018 and $11.1 million at March 31, 2018.~~2019. Classified loans net of the allowance for loan losses and fair value adjustments at March 31, 2020 were comprised of ~~$7.3 million and $7.5~~$11.4 million of loans in the special mention category and ~~$7.5~~$3.7 million of loans in the substandard category as compared to $8.6 million of loans in the special mention category and ~~$7.4~~$7.6 million of loans in the substandard category at ~~March 31, 2019 and~~ June 30, ~~2018, respectively.~~2019.

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. During the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, the Corporation recorded a ~~recovery from the allowance~~provision for loan losses of ~~$450,000,~~$671,000, as compared to a ~~$347,000~~ recovery ~~from the allowance for loan losses~~of $450,000 in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~recovery from the allowance~~provision for loan losses in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 was primarily attributable to ~~the decrease~~a qualitative component established in ~~loans held~~our allowance for ~~investment and the recoveries related~~loan losses methodology in response to the ~~payoff~~deteriorating economic conditions and probable loan losses driven by the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the ~~two non-performing loans during the first nine months of fiscal 2019.~~U.S. and global economies. Net loan recoveries in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 were ~~$145,000~~$63,000 or ~~(0.02)~~0.01 percent (annualized) of average loans receivable, ~~in contrast~~as compared to net loan ~~charge offs~~recoveries of ~~$161,000~~$145,000 or 0.02 percent (annualized) of average loans receivable in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019.

The allowance for loan losses was determined through quantitative and qualitative adjustments including the Bank's charge-off experience and reflects the impact on loans held for investment from the current general economic conditions of the U.S. and California ~~economies such as the improving unemployment rate and higher home prices in California.~~economies. See related discussion of ~~"Asset Quality" below.~~“Asset Quality.”

At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the allowance for loan losses was ~~$7.1~~$7.8 million, comprised of collectively evaluated allowances of ~~$6.9~~$7.7 million and individually evaluated allowances of ~~$132,000;~~$51,000; in comparison to the allowance for loan losses of ~~$7.4~~$7.1 million at June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, comprised of collectively evaluated allowances of ~~$7.2~~$7.0 million and individually evaluated allowances of ~~$157,000.~~$130,000. The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment was ~~0.79~~0.85 percent at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 as compared to ~~0.81~~0.80 percent at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Management considers, based on currently available information, the allowance for loan losses sufficient to absorb potential losses inherent in loans held for investment. For further analysis on the allowance for loan losses, see Note 65 of the Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. A further decline in national and local economic conditions, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic or other factors, could result in a material increase in the allowance for loan losses and may adversely affect the Corporation’s financial condition and results of operations.

Non-Interest Income:

For the Quarters Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Total non-interest income decreased ~~$2.1~~$2.0 million, or 4064 percent, to ~~$3.1~~$1.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from $5.2 million for the same period last year. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the net gain on sale of loans during the current quarter as compared to the comparable period last year.

The net gain on sale of loans decreased $1.9 million, or 53 percent, to $1.7 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2019 from $3.6 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2018 reflecting the impact of a lower loan sale volume, partly offset by a higher average loan sale margin. Total loan sale volume, which includes the net change in commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale, decreased $139.7 million or 59 percent to $95.8 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2019 from $235.5 million in the comparable quarter last year. The decrease in loan sale volume was attributable to the winding down of the mortgage banking operations. Refinance loans as a percentage of total loans originated by PBM during the third quarter of fiscal 2019 was 30 percent, down from 37 percent in the same quarter of fiscal 2018. Retail loans as a percentage of total loans originated for sale by PBM during the third quarter of fiscal 2019 were 65 percent, up from 59 percent in the same quarter of fiscal 2018. The average loan sale margin for PBM increased 26 basis points to 1.79 percent in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 from 1.53 percent in the same period of fiscal 2018. The increase in the average loan sale margin was the result of a higher percentage of retail loan production (which generally has higher loan sale margins) versus wholesale loan production and maintaining pricing discipline throughout the quarter. The gain on sale of loans includes an unfavorable fair-value adjustment on loans held for sale and derivative financial instruments (commitments to extend credit, commitments to sell loans, commitments to sell mortgage-backed securities, and option contracts) pursuant to ASC 815 and ASC 825 that amounted to a net loss of $778,000 in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 as compared to a net loss of $844,000 in the same period last year. The fair-value adjustment on loans held for sale and derivative financial instruments is consistent with the Bank's mortgage banking activity and the volatility of mortgage interest rates. As of March 31, 2019, the fair value of derivative financial instruments pursuant to ASC 815 and ASC 825 was $951,000, compared to $2.9 million at June 30, 2018 and $2.8 million at March 31, 2018.

~~For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.~~ ~~Total non-interest income decreased $6.1 million, or 35 percent, to $11.2 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2019 from $17.3~~$3.1 million for the same period last year. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the gain on sale of loans.

The net gain on sale of loans decreased ~~$5.7~~$1.7 million, or 4499 percent, to ~~$7.1~~a net gain of $14,000 for the third quarter of fiscal 2020 from a net gain of $1.7 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2019. The net gain in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 was primarily attributable to an accrual recovery of loan sale premium refunds from the early payoff of loans previously sold. There was no loan sale volume in the third quarter of fiscal 2020 consistent with the Corporation’s scaling back of the origination of saleable single-family mortgage loans, as compared to $95.8 million in the quarter ended March 31, 2019 with an average loan sale margin of 1.79 percent.

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2020 and 2019. Total non-interest income decreased $7.7 million, or 69 percent, to $3.5 million for the nine months ended March 31, 2020 from $11.2 million for the same period last year. The decrease was primarily attributable to a decrease in the gain on sale of loans.

The net gain on sale of loans decreased $7.2 million, or 102 percent, to a net loss of $115,000 for the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$12.8~~a net gain of $7.1 million in the same period of fiscal 2018 reflecting the impact of a lower loan sale volume, partly offset by a higher average loan sale margin. Total loan sale volume was $408.9 million in the first nine months ended March 31, 2019, down $506.5 million, or 55 percent, from $915.4 million in the comparable period last year.2019. The decrease in loan sale volume was attributable primarily to the winding down of the mortgage banking operations. Refinance loans as a percentage of total loans originated by PBM during the first nine months of fiscal 2019 were 29 percent, down from 41 percent in the same period of

fiscal 2018. Retail loans as a percentage of total loans originated for sale by PBM during the first nine months of fiscal 2019 were 64 percent, up from 56 percent in the same period of fiscal 2018. The average loan sale margin for PBM during the first nine months of fiscal 2019 was 1.73 percent, up 34 basis points from 1.39 percent for the same period of fiscal 2018. The increase in the average loan sale margin was the result of a higher percentage of retail loan production (which generally has higher loan sale margins) versus wholesale loan production and maintaining pricing discipline throughout the period. The gain on sale of loans includes an unfavorable fair-value adjustment on derivative financial instruments pursuant to ASC 815 and ASC 825, a net loss ~~of $1.9 million~~ in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 was primarily attributable to loan sale premium refunds from the early payoff of loans previously sold. There was no loan sale volume in the first nine months of fiscal 2020, as compared to ~~a net loss~~$408.9 million during the nine months ended March 31, 2019 with an average loan sale margin of ~~$2.2 million in the same period last year.~~1.73 percent.

Non-Interest Expense:

For the Quarters Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Total non-interest expense in the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$13.0~~$7.5 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$561,000,~~$5.5 million, or ~~five~~42 percent, as compared to ~~$12.4~~$13.0 million in the quarter ended March 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~increase~~decrease was primarily ~~a result~~attributable to scaling back the origination of ~~an increase~~saleable single-family mortgage loans resulting in significant reductions in salaries and employee benefits ~~expense.~~expenses due to lower incentive compensation and staff reductions and lower premises and occupancy expenses due to the closing of loan production offices, as well as reductions in other related expenses.

~~Total salaries~~59

Salaries and employee benefits expense ~~increased $484,000,~~decreased $4.3 million, or ~~five~~47 percent, to ~~$9.3~~$5.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$8.8~~$9.3 million in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~increase in~~decrease was due primarily to lower salaries and employee benefits expenses resulting from fewer employees and incentive payments consistent with the scaling back of saleable single-family mortgage loan originations. The salaries and employee benefits expense ~~was primarily attributable~~in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 includes approximately $4.3 million of salaries and employee benefits expenses related to the staffing associated with saleable single-family loan originations, which includes $1.5 million of one-time costs associated with staff reductions in mortgage banking operations and $674,000 in current costs associated with incentive compensation accruals, partly offset by lower variable compensation resulting from lower mortgage banking loan originations.reductions. Total loan originations and purchases ~~(including loans originated and purchased for investment and loans originated for sale)~~ decreased ~~$114.8~~$125.9 million, or 4381 percent, to ~~$154.7~~$28.8 million in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$269.5~~$154.7 million in the ~~comparable~~same quarter of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. Total full-time equivalent employees ~~in the mortgage banking division~~(“FTE”) were ~~107~~183 at March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, down 47115 FTE or 39 percent from ~~200~~298 FTE at March 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

On January 30, 2019, the Corporation announced that Bank will close its La Quinta Branch effective at the close of business on May 10, 2019. The Bank anticipates an annual operational cost savings of approximately $473,000, primarily in salaries and employee benefits expenses and premisesPremises and occupancy expenses ~~subsequent~~decreased $441,000, or 34 percent, to ~~the branch closure. Total one-time charges for the branch closure will be approximately $18,000.~~

~~On February 4, 2019, the Corporation announced that the Corporation's Board of Directors determined that it was~~$845,000 in the long-term best interests of the Corporation to exit the operations of the Corporation's mortgage banking segment conducted through PBM. The Corporation estimates that it will incur one-time costs of approximately $3.6 million to $4.0 million to complete the exit during the remainderthird quarter of fiscal 2019, which amounts include costs for severance, retention, personnel, premises, occupancy, depreciation, and costs related to termination of data processing and other contractual arrangements. As of March 31, 2019, the total one-time costs incurred were $1.6 million, comprised of $1.52020 from $1.3 million in ~~salaries and employee benefits expenses, $81,000~~the same quarter of fiscal 2019. The decrease in premises and occupancy expenses was due primarily to the closure of 10 loan production offices and ~~$13,000~~one retail banking center.

Other non-interest expenses decreased $324,000, or 29 percent, to $798,000 in ~~equipment expenses.~~the third quarter of fiscal 2020 from $1.1 million in the same quarter of fiscal 2019. The decrease in other non-interest expenses was primarily attributable to lower loan origination expenses consistent with the scaling back of saleable single-family loan originations.

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Total non-interest expense in the nine months ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~$35.6~~$22.3 million, a decrease of ~~$5.8~~$13.3 million or 1437 percent, as compared to ~~$41.4~~$35.6 million in the same period ended March 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in salaries and employee benefits expense, premises and inoccupancy expenses and other non-interest expense.

~~Total salaries~~Salaries and employee benefits expense decreased ~~$1.9~~$9.8 million, or ~~seven~~40 percent, to ~~$24.8~~$15.0 million in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$26.7~~$24.8 million in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. The decrease was due primarily ~~attributable~~ to lower salaries and employee benefits expenses resulting from fewer employees and incentive ~~compensation costs~~payments consistent with the scaling back of saleable single-family mortgage loan originations. The salaries and ~~PBM staff reductions~~employee benefits expense in the first nine months of fiscal 2019 includes approximately $10.6 million of salaries and employee benefits expenses related to ~~lower mortgage banking~~the staffing associated with saleable single-family loan originations, ~~attributable to the winding down~~which includes $1.5 million of ~~the mortgage banking operations, partly offset by~~ one-time costs associated with staff ~~reductions in mortgage banking operations and incentive compensation accruals.~~reductions. Total loan originations and purchases ~~(including loans originated and purchased for investment and loans originated for sale)~~ decreased ~~$500.0~~$369.5 million, or 4764 percent, to ~~$573.4~~$203.9 million in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$1.07 billion~~$573.4 million in the comparable period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019.

~~Total other non-interest~~Premises and occupancy expenses decreased ~~$3.8~~$1.3 million, or 5533 percent, to ~~$3.1~~$2.6 million in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$6.9~~$3.9 million in the same period of fiscal ~~2018.~~2019. Equipment expense decreased $478,000, or 36 percent, to $855,000 in the first nine months of fiscal 2020 from $1.3 million in the same period of fiscal 2019. The decrease in both premises and occupancy expenses and equipment expense was due primarily to the closure of 10 loan production offices and one retail banking center.

Deposit insurance premiums and regulatory assessments decreased $364,000, or 79 percent, to $97,000 in the first nine months of fiscal 2020 from $461,000 in the same period of fiscal 2019. The decrease was due primarily to a small bank assessment credit awarded by the FDIC in September 2019 which reduced assessment fees for the first nine months of fiscal 2020.

Other non-interest expenses decreased $892,000, or 29 percent, to $2.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2020 from $3.1 million in the same period of fiscal 2019. The decrease in other non-interest expenses was primarily attributable to ~~litigation~~lower loan origination expenses consistent with the scaling back of saleable single-family loan originations. In addition, a $296,000 partial reversion of a previously recognized legal settlement expense of $3.4 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2018, not replicated this current period. No additional contingencies exist regarding these legal matters although the settlement agreements remain subject to court approval and other customary conditions. For additional information see(see Part II, Item ~~1, "Legal Proceedings."~~1- Legal Proceedings) was recorded during the nine months ended March 31, 2020.

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes:

The income tax provision reflects accruals for taxes at the applicable rates for federal income tax and California franchise tax based upon reported pre-tax income, adjusted for the effect of all permanent differences between income for tax and financial reporting purposes, such as non-deductible stock-based compensation, earnings from bank-owned life insurance policies and certain California tax-exempt loans, among others. Therefore, there are fluctuations in the effective income tax rate from period to period based on the relationship of net permanent differences to income before tax.

For the Quarters Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s income tax ~~benefit~~provision was ~~$189,000~~$467,000 for the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, in contrast to ~~a $667,000~~an income tax ~~provision~~benefit of $189,000 in the same quarter last year (an $856,000 difference). The decrease was attributable to loss before taxes and a lower federal income tax rate in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 in comparison to income before taxes in the same quarter last year. Since the Corporation has a fiscal year end of June 30th, the reduced federal corporate income tax rate from the Tax Act for fiscal 2018 was the result of the application of a blended federal statutory tax rate of 28.06%, and is a flat 21% federal corporate income tax rate for fiscal 2019 and thereafter. The effective income tax rate for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 was 28.97% and ~~2018~~the effective income tax benefit for the quarter ended March 31, 2019 was 55.59% ~~and 27.79%, respectively. The higher effective tax rate in the third quarter of fiscal 2019 was due primarily to tax benefits resulting from stock-based compensation activities.~~. The Corporation believes that the effective income tax rate applied in the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 reflects its current income tax obligations.

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s provision for income taxes was ~~$1.2~~$2.6 million for the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019, down 52~~2020, up 106 percent from the ~~$2.5~~$1.2 million provision for income taxes in the same period last year. The ~~decrease in the provision for income taxes~~increase was ~~primarily~~ attributable to the one-time, non-cash, net tax charge of $1.9 million from the net deferred tax assets revaluation and the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate resulting from the Tax Act, partly offset by the higher income before income taxes ~~recorded~~ in the ~~second quarter~~first nine months of fiscal ~~2018.~~2020 in comparison to the same period last year. The effective income tax rate for the nine months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was 29.49% and ~~2018 was~~ 25.42% ~~and 77.56%~~, respectively. The Corporation believes that the effective income tax rate applied in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 reflects its current income tax obligations.

Asset Quality

Non-performing loans, net of the allowance for loan losses and fair value adjustments, consisting of loans with collateral located in California, ~~remained unchanged at $6.1~~was $3.6 million at ~~both~~ March 31, ~~2019~~2020, down 42 percent from $6.2 million at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Non-performing loans as a percentage of loans held for investment at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 was ~~0.69%~~0.40%, upimproving from ~~0.67%~~0.71% at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The non-performing loans at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 are comprised of 2016 single-family loans ($~~5.3~~3.6 million)~~, one construction loan ($745,000)~~ and one commercial business loan ($~~44,000)~~34,000). No interest accruals were made for loans that were past due 90 days or more or if the loans were deemed non-performing.

As of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, total restructured loans decreased ~~$601,000,~~$2.0 million, or 1253 percent, to ~~$4.6~~$1.8 million from ~~$5.2~~$3.8 million at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. At March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018, $2.7~~2019, $1.8 million and ~~$3.4~~$1.9 million of these restructured loans were classified as non-performing, respectively. As of March 31, ~~2019, $2.9 million,~~2020, $683,000, or 6339 percent, of the restructured loans have a current payment status, consistent with their modified payment terms; this compares to ~~$2.9~~$2.4 million, or 5663 percent, of restructured loans that had a current payment status, consistent with their modified payment terms as of June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

There was no real estate owned at both March 31, ~~2019 as compared to $906,000 at~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018 (two single-family properties located in California).~~2019.

Non-performing assets, which includes non-performing loans and real estate owned, if any, decreased ~~$848,000~~$2.6 million or 1242 percent to ~~$6.1~~$3.6 million or ~~0.55~~0.33 percent of total assets at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$7.0~~$6.2 million or ~~0.59~~0.57 percent of total assets at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. Restructured loans which are performing in accordance with their modified terms and are not otherwise classified non-accrual are not included in non-performing assets. For further analysis on non-performing loans and restructured loans, see Note 65 of the Notes to Unaudited Interim Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Occasionally, the Corporation is required to repurchase loans sold to Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae or other institutional investors if it is determined that such loans do not meet the credit requirements of the investor, or if one of the parties involved in the loan misrepresented pertinent facts, committed fraud, or if such loans were 90-days past due within 120 days of the loan funding date. During the first nine months of fiscal 2019, the Corporation repurchased five loans totaling $699,000, including two loans that were fully charged off ($25,000). In comparison, the Corporation repurchased two loans totaling $602,000 from investors during the first nine months of fiscal 2018. Additional repurchase requests may have been settled that did not result in the repurchase of the loan itself. The primary reasons for honoring the repurchase requests are borrower fraud, undisclosed liabilities on borrower applications, and documentation, verification and appraisal disputes. For the first nine months of fiscal 2019 and 2018, the Corporation recorded a $33,000 recovery and a $22,000 recovery from the recourse liability, respectively, and did not settle any claims. As of March 31, 2019, the total recourse reserve for loans sold that are subject to repurchase decreased to $250,000, as compared to $283,000 at both June 30, 2018 and March 31, 2018.

~~The following table shows the summary of the recourse liability for the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018:~~

A decline in real estate values subsequent to the time of origination of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s real estate secured loans could result in higher loan delinquency levels, foreclosures, provisions for loan losses and net charge-offs. Real estate values and real estate markets are beyond the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s control and are generally affected by changes in national, regional or local economic conditions and other factors. These factors include fluctuations in interest rates and the availability of loans to potential

purchasers, changes in tax laws and other governmental statutes, regulations and policies and acts of nature, such as earthquakes, fires and national disasters particular to California where substantially all of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s real estate collateral is located. If real estate values decline, ~~from the levels described in the following tables (which were derived at the time of loan origination),~~ the value of the real estate collateral securing the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s loans as set forth in the table could be significantly overstated. The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s ability to recover on defaulted loans by foreclosing and selling the real estate collateral would

then be diminished and it would be more likely to suffer losses on defaulted loans. The Corporation generally does not update the loan-to-value ratio ~~("LTV"~~(“LTV”) on its loans held for investment by obtaining new appraisals or broker price opinions (nor does the Corporation intend to do so in the future as a result of the costs and inefficiencies associated with completing the task) unless a specific loan has demonstrated deterioration or the Corporation receives a loan modification request from a borrower (in which case individually evaluated allowances are established, if required). Therefore, it is reasonable to assume that the LTV ratios disclosed in the following tables may be understated or overstated in comparison to their current LTV ratios as a result of their year of origination, the subsequent general decline or improvement in real estate values that has occurred and the specific location and condition of the individual properties. The Corporation has not quantified the current LTVs of its loans held for investment nor the impact the decline or improvement in real estate values has had on the original LTVs of its loans held for investment.

~~The following table describes certain credit risk characteristics of the Corporation's single-family, first trust deed, mortgage loans held for investment as of March 31, 2019:~~

(Dollars In Thousands)
Outstanding
Balance ⁽¹⁾

Weighted-
Average
FICO ⁽²⁾

Weighted-
Average
LTV ⁽³⁾

Weighted-
Average
Seasoning ⁽⁴⁾
Interest only $ 1,500 619 75% 1.21 years
Stated income ⁽⁵⁾
$ 56,323 733 58% 13.33 years
FICO less than or equal to 660 $ 7,656 638 65% 8.22 years
Over 30-year amortization $ 7,528 726 63% 13.63 years

⁽¹⁾	The outstanding balance presented on this table may overlap more than one category. Of the outstanding balance, $2.9 million of "stated income," $300 of "FICO less than or equal to 660," and $214 of "over 30-year amortization" balances were non-performing.

⁽²⁾

Based on borrower's FICO scores at the time of loan origination. The FICO score represents the creditworthiness of a borrower based on the borrower's credit history, as reported by an independent third party. A higher FICO score indicates a greater degree of creditworthiness. Bank regulators have issued guidance stating that a FICO score of 660 and below is indicative of a "subprime" borrower.

⁽³⁾	~~LTV is the ratio derived by dividing the current loan balance by the lower of the original appraised value or purchase price of the real estate collateral.~~

⁽⁴⁾	~~Seasoning describes the number of years since the funding date of the loan.~~

⁽⁵⁾	~~Stated income is defined as borrower stated income on his/her loan application which was not subject to verification during the loan origination process.~~

The following table summarizes the amortization schedule of the Corporation's interest only single-family, first trust deed, mortgage loans held for investment, including the percentage of those which are identified as non-performing or 30 – 89 days delinquent as of March 31, 2019:

(Dollars In Thousands) Balance
Non-Performing ⁽¹⁾

30 - 89 Days
Delinquent ⁽¹⁾

Fully amortize in the next 12 months $ 1,500 —% —%
Fully amortize between 1 year and 5 years — —% —%
Fully amortize after 5 years — —% —%
Total $ 1,500 —% —%

⁽¹⁾	~~As a percentage of each category.~~

The following table summarizes the interest rate reset (repricing) schedule of the Corporation's stated income single-family, first trust deed, mortgage loans held for investment, including the percentage of those which are identified as non-performing or 30 – 89 days delinquent as of March 31, 2019:

(Dollars In Thousands)
Balance ⁽¹⁾

Non-Performing ⁽¹⁾

30 - 89 Days
Delinquent ⁽¹⁾

Interest rate reset in the next 12 months $ 55,616 4% 1%
Interest rate reset between 1 year and 5 years — —% —%
Interest rate reset after 5 years 707 100% —%
Total $ 56,323 5% 1%

⁽¹⁾	~~As a percentage of each category.~~

The following table describes certain credit risk characteristics, geographic locations and the calendar year of loan origination of the Corporation's single-family, first trust deed, mortgage loans held for investment, at March 31, 2019:

Calendar Year of Origination
(Dollars In
Thousands)

2011 &
Prior

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

YTD
2019

Total

Loan balance (in
thousands)
$ 93,005 $ 1,937 $ 1,681 $ 5,127 $ 8,812 $ 28,554 $ 67,035 $ 81,516 $ 14,985 $ 302,652
Weighted-average
LTV ⁽¹⁾
58% 53% 40% 62% 68% 63% 72% 70% 68% 65%
Weighted-average
age (in years)
13.42 6.58 5.85 4.68 3.82 2.72 1.86 0.74 0.92 5.30
Weighted-average
FICO ⁽²⁾
730 757 758 754 746 752 739 743 769 741
Number of loans 347 10 18 16 13 56 104 140 26 730

Geographic
breakdown (%)

Inland Empire 37% 17% 56% 33% 18% 26% 33% 42% 9% 34%
Southern
California ⁽³⁾
51% 52% 25% 38% 57% 34% 45% 50% 29% 47%
Other California ⁽⁴⁾
11% 31% 19% 29% 25% 40% 22% 8% 62% 19%
Other States 1% —% —% —% —% —% —% —% —% —%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

⁽¹⁾	~~LTV is the ratio derived by dividing the current loan balance by the lower of the original appraised value or purchase price of the real estate collateral.~~

⁽²⁾	~~At time of loan origination.~~

⁽³⁾	~~Other than the Inland Empire.~~

⁽⁴⁾	~~Other than the Inland Empire and Southern California.~~

The following table summarizes the interest rate reset (repricing) schedule of the Corporation's single-family, first trust deed, mortgage loans held for investment, including the percentage of those which are identified as non-performing or 30 – 89 days delinquent as of March 31, 2019:

(Dollars In Thousands)
Balance ⁽¹⁾

Non-Performing ⁽¹⁾

30 - 89 Days
Delinquent ⁽¹⁾

Interest rate reset in the next 12 months $ 100,266 3% 1%
Interest rate reset between 1 year and 5 years 130,090 —% —%
Interest rate reset after 5 years 72,296 3% —%
Total $ 302,652 2% —%

⁽¹⁾	~~As a percentage of each category.~~

The following table describes certain credit risk characteristics, geographic locations and the calendar year of loan origination of the Corporation's multi-family loans held for investment, at March 31, 2019:

Calendar Year of Origination
(Dollars In Thousands)
2011 &
Prior

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

YTD
2019

Total

Loan balance (in
thousands)
$ 16,057 $ 9,816 $ 25,044 $ 49,349 $ 68,866 $ 110,780 $ 72,030 $ 76,332 $ 21,538 $ 449,812
Weighted-average LTV ⁽¹⁾
37% 48% 48% 49% 51% 47% 49% 45% 59% 48%
Weighted-average DCR ⁽²⁾
1.75x 1.90x 1.83x 1.70x 1.67x 1.67x 1.67x 1.57x 1.47x 1.66x
Weighted-average age (in
years)
13.02 6.54 5.63 4.74 3.70 2.75 1.81 0.83 0.07 3.12
Weighted-average FICO ⁽³⁾
727 745 767 768 753 762 751 757 750 756
Number of loans 40 13 44 74 114 136 116 93 25 655

Geographic breakdown
(%)

Inland Empire 34% —% 41% 16% 18% 11% 17% 12% 10% 16%
Southern California ⁽⁴⁾
56% 78% 46% 50% 60% 61% 64% 68% 68% 61%
Other California ⁽⁵⁾
8% 22% 13% 34% 22% 28% 19% 20% 22% 23%
Other States 2% —% —% —% —% —% —% —% —% —%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

⁽¹⁾	~~LTV is the ratio derived by dividing the current loan balance by the lower of the original appraised value or purchase price of the real estate collateral.~~

⁽²⁾	~~Debt Coverage Ratio ("DCR") at time of origination.~~

⁽³⁾	~~At time of loan origination.~~

⁽⁴⁾	~~Other than the Inland Empire.~~

⁽⁵⁾	~~Other than the Inland Empire and Southern California.~~

The following table summarizes the interest rate reset or maturity schedule of the Corporation's multi-family loans held for investment, including the percentage of those which are identified as non-performing, 30 – 89 days delinquent or not fully amortizing as of March 31, 2019:

(Dollars In Thousands) Balance
Non-
Performing ⁽¹⁾

30 - 89 Days
Delinquent

Percentage
Not Fully
Amortizing ⁽¹⁾
Interest rate reset or mature in the next 12 months $ 132,835 —% —% 7%
Interest rate reset or mature between 1 year and 5 years 302,422 —% —% 1%
Interest rate reset or mature after 5 years 14,555 —% —% —%
Total $ 449,812 —% —% 3%

⁽¹⁾	~~As a percentage of each category.~~

The following table describes certain credit risk characteristics, geographic locations and the calendar year of loan origination of the Corporation's commercial real estate loans held for investment, at March 31, 2019:

Calendar Year of Origination
(Dollars In Thousands)
2011 &
Prior

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

YTD
2019

Total ⁽⁵⁾⁽⁶⁾
Loan balance (in
thousands)
$ 537 $ 9,373 $ 7,679 $ 18,237 $ 19,278 $ 15,791 $ 19,366 $ 19,900 $ 5,194 $ 115,355
Weighted-average LTV ⁽¹⁾
36% 44% 48% 42% 39% 47% 42% 44% 42% 43%
Weighted-average DCR ⁽²⁾
1.38x 1.98x 1.65x 1.96x 1.8x 1.57x 1.82x 1.61x 1.45x 1.75x
Weighted-average age (in
years)
10.09 6.48 5.71 4.59 3.69 2.86 1.61 0.79 0.11 3.10
Weighted-average FICO ⁽²⁾
711 742 767 753 757 758 773 754 738 757
Number of loans 4 7 12 22 25 22 23 29 6 150

Geographic breakdown
(%):

Inland Empire 69% 78% 27% 41% 31% 11% 26% 10% —% 28%
Southern California ⁽³⁾
31% 22% 45% 44% 32% 65% 52% 55% 81% 48%
Other California ⁽⁴⁾
—% —% 28% 15% 37% 24% 22% 35% 19% 24%
Other States —% —% —% —% —% —% —% —% —% —%
Total 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

⁽¹⁾	~~LTV is the ratio derived by dividing the current loan balance by the lower of the original appraised value or purchase price of the real estate collateral.~~

⁽²⁾	~~At time of loan origination.~~

⁽³⁾	~~Other than the Inland Empire.~~

⁽⁴⁾	~~Other than the Inland Empire and Southern California.~~

⁽⁵⁾

Comprised of the following: $47.2 million in Mixed Use; $20.7 million in Office; $19.9 million in Retail; $8.6 million in Mobile Home Parks; $7.7 million in Warehouse; $4.3 million in Medical/Dental Office; $2.7 million in Mini-Storage; $1.7 million in Restaurant/Fast Food; $1.5 million in Light Industrial/Manufacturing and $1.1 million in Automotive – Non Gasoline.

⁽⁶⁾	~~Consisting of $108.9 million or 94.4 percent in investment properties and $6.5 million or 5.6 percent in owner occupied properties.~~

The following table summarizes the interest rate reset or maturity schedule of the Corporation's commercial real estate loans held for investment, including the percentage of those which are identified as non-performing, 30 – 89 days delinquent or not fully amortizing as of March 31, 2019:

(Dollars In Thousands) Balance
Non-
Performing ⁽¹⁾

30 - 89 Days
Delinquent

Percentage
Not Fully
Amortizing ⁽¹⁾

Interest rate reset or mature in the next 12 months $ 45,699 —% —% 83%
Interest rate reset or mature between 1 year and 5 years 69,656 —% —% 90%
Interest rate reset or mature after 5 years — —% —% —%
Total $ 115,355 —% —% 87%

⁽¹⁾	~~As a percentage of each category.~~

The following table sets forth information with respect to the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s non-performing assets, net of allowance for loan losses and fair value adjustments, at the dates indicated:

(In Thousands)	At March 31, 2020			At June 30, 2019
Loans on non-accrual status (excluding restructured loans):
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	$	1,875		$	3,315
Construction	—			971
Total	1,875			4,286

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more	—			—

Restructured loans on non-accrual status:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	1,726			1,891
Commercial business loans	34			41
Total	1,760			1,932

Total non-performing loans	3,635			6,218

Real estate owned, net	—			—
Total non-performing assets	$	3,635		$	6,218

Non-performing loans as a percentage of loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses	0.40		%	0.71		%

Non-performing loans as a percentage of total assets	0.33		%	0.57		%

Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets	0.33		%	0.57		%

(In Thousands)
At March 31,
2019

At June 30,
2018

Loans on non-accrual status (excluding restructured loans):
Mortgage loans:
     Single-family $ 2,657 $ 2,665
     Construction 745 —
     Total 3,402 2,665

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more — —

Restructured loans on non-accrual status:
Mortgage loans:
     Single-family 2,669 3,328
Commercial business loans 44 64
     Total 2,713 3,392

Total non-performing loans 6,115 6,057

Real estate owned, net — 906
Total non-performing assets $ 6,115 $ 6,963

Non-performing loans as a percentage of loans held for investment, net
   of allowance for loan losses
0.69 % 0.67 %

Non-performing loans as a percentage of total assets 0.55 % 0.52 %

Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets 0.55 % 0.59 %

~~The following table describes the non-performing loans, net of allowance for loan losses and fair value adjustments, by the calendar year of origination as of March 31, 2019:~~

Calendar Year of Origination
(In Thousands)
2011 &
Prior
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
YTD
2019
Total
Mortgage loans:
Single-family $ 3,775 $ 84 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 1,467 $ — $ — $ 5,326
Construction — — — — — — — 745 — 745
Commercial business
loans
44 — — — — — — — — 44
Total $ 3,819 $ 84 $ — $ — $ — $ — $ 1,467 $ 745 $ — $ 6,115

~~The following table describes the non-performing loans, net of allowance for loan losses and fair value adjustments, by the geographic location as of March 31, 2019:~~

(In Thousands) Inland Empire
Southern
California ⁽¹⁾

Other
California ⁽²⁾
Other States Total
Mortgage loans:
Single-family $ 1,892 $ 2,110 $ 1,324 $ — $ 5,326
Construction — 745 — — 745
Commercial business loans 44 — — — 44
Total $ 1,936 $ 2,855 $ 1,324 $ — $ 6,115

⁽¹⁾	~~Other than the Inland Empire.~~

⁽²⁾	~~Other than the Inland Empire and Southern California.~~

The following table summarizes classified assets, which is comprised of classified loans, net of allowance for loan losses and fair value adjustments, and real estate owned, if any, at the dates indicated:

	At March 31, 2020			At June 30, 2019
(Dollars In Thousands)	Balance		Count	Balance		Count
Special mention loans:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	$	5,954	15	$	3,795	13
Multi-family	3,799		3	3,864		3
Commercial real estate	—		—	927		1
Construction	1,671		1	—		—
Total special mention loans	11,424		19	8,586		17

Substandard loans:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	3,601		18	6,631		23
Construction	—		—	971		1
Commercial business loans	34		1	41		1
Total substandard loans	3,635		19	7,643		25

Total classified loans	15,059		38	16,229		42

Real estate owned	—		—	—		—

Total classified assets	$	15,059	38	$	16,229	42

At March 31,
2019

At June 30,
2018

(Dollars In Thousands) Balance Count Balance Count
Special mention loans:
Mortgage loans:
     Single-family $ 3,347 12 $ 2,584 8
     Multi-family 3,885 3 3,947 3
     Commercial real estate — — 940 1
          Total special mention loans 7,232 15 7,471 12

Substandard loans:
Mortgage loans:
     Single-family 6,751 23 7,391 24
     Construction 745 1 — —
     Commercial business loans 44 1 64 1
          Total substandard loans 7,540 25 7,455 25

Total classified loans 14,772 40 14,926 37

Real estate owned:
     Single-family — — 906 2
          Total real estate owned — — 906 2

Total classified assets $ 14,772 40 $ 15,832 39

Loan Volume Activities

The following table is provided to disclose details related to the volume of loans originated, purchased and sold for the ~~quarters~~quarter and nine months indicated:

	For the Quarters Ended March 31,							For the Nine Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)	2020			2019				2020				2019
Loans originated for sale:
Retail originations	$	—		$	72,353		$		—		$		287,399
Wholesale originations	—			38,353			—				166,045
Total loans originated for sale	—			110,706			—				453,444

Loans sold:
Servicing released	—			(134,264		)	—				(510,798			)
Servicing retained	—			(2,409		)	—				(5,193			)
Total loans sold	—			(136,673		)	—				(515,991			)

Loans originated for investment:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	9,654			6,862			25,221				48,258
Multi-family	10,390			9,523			44,661				27,678
Commercial real estate	5,570			4,040			14,468				12,520
Construction	774			1,970			3,983				5,313
Consumer loans	—			—			1				—
Total loans originated for investment	26,388			22,395			88,334				93,769

Loans purchased for investment:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	—			8,426			70,733				8,426
Multi-family	2,460			4,622			44,829				16,645
Commercial real estate	—			1,157			—				1,157
Total loans purchased for investment	2,460			21,606			115,562				26,228

Mortgage loan principal payments	(55,685		)	(36,456		)	(171,719			)	(140,548			)
(Decrease) increase in other items, net ⁽¹⁾	(585		)	(499		)	2,205				(1,831			)

Net (decrease) increase in loans held for investment and loans held for sale at fair value	$	(27,422	)	$	(18,921	)	$		34,382		$		(84,929	)

For the Quarters Ended
March 31,

For the Nine Months Ended
March 31,

(In Thousands) 2019 2018 2019 2018
Loans originated for sale:
   Retail originations $ 72,353 $ 129,816 $ 287,399 $ 526,904
   Wholesale originations 38,353 90,377 166,045 417,445
        Total loans originated for sale ⁽¹⁾
110,706 220,193 453,444 944,349

Loans sold:
    Servicing released (134,264 ) (220,532 ) (510,798 ) (945,715 )
    Servicing retained (2,409 ) (5,326 ) (5,193 ) (22,574 )
        Total loans sold ⁽²⁾
(136,673 ) (225,858 ) (515,991 ) (968,289 )

Loans originated for investment:
    Mortgage loans:
          Single-family 6,862 22,665 48,258 62,363
          Multi-family 9,523 18,612 27,678 40,279
          Commercial real estate 4,040 5,930 12,520 18,900
          Construction 1,970 2,050 5,313 4,459
    Consumer loans — — — 3
        Total loans originated for investment  ⁽³⁾
22,395 49,257 93,769 126,004

Loans purchased for investment:
    Mortgage loans:
          Single-family 8,426 — 8,426 —
          Multi-family 12,023 — 16,645 2,241
          Commercial real estate 1,157 — 1,157 868
Total loans purchased for investment ⁽³⁾
21,606 — 26,228 3,109

Mortgage loan principal payments (36,456 ) (43,163 ) (140,548 ) (143,914 )
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans — (959 ) — (1,659 )
(Decrease) increase in other items, net ⁽⁴⁾
(499 ) 1,955 (1,831 ) 2,923

Net (decrease) increase in loans held for investment and
loans held for sale at fair value
$ (18,921 ) $ 1,425 $ (84,929 ) $ (37,477 )

⁽¹⁾	~~Includes PBM loans originated for sale during the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 totaling $110.7 million, $220.2 million, $453.4 million and $944.3 million, respectively.~~

⁽²⁾	~~Includes PBM loans sold during the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 totaling $136.7 million, $225.9 million, $516.0 million and $968.3 million, respectively.~~

⁽³⁾	Includes PBM loans originated and purchased for investment during the quarters and nine months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 totaling $4.0 million, $20.6 million, $44.0 million and $58.4 million, respectively.

⁽⁴⁾	Includes net changes in undisbursed loan funds, deferred loan fees or costs, allowance for loan losses, fair value of loans held for investment, fair value of loans held for sale, advance payments of escrows and repurchases.

Loans that the Corporation has originated for sale are primarily sold on a servicing released basis. Clear ownership is conveyed to the investor by endorsing the original note in favor of the investor; transferring the servicing to a new servicer consistent with investor instructions; communicating the servicing transfer to the borrower as required by law; and sending the loan file and collateral instruments electronically to the investor contemporaneous with receiving the cash proceeds from the sale of the loan. Additionally, the Corporation registers the change of ownership in the mortgage electronic registration system known as MERS as required by the contractual terms of the loan sale agreement. Also, the Corporation retains an imaged copy of the entire loan file and collateral instruments as an abundance of caution in the event questions arise that can only be answered by reviewing the loan file. Additionally, the Corporation does not originate or sponsor mortgage-backed securities.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s primary sources of funds are deposits, ~~proceeds from the sale of loans originated for sale,~~ proceeds from principal and interest payments on loans, proceeds from the maturity and sale of investment securities, FHLB – San Francisco advances, access to the discount window facility at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and access to a federal funds facility with its correspondent bank. While maturities

and scheduled amortization of loans and investment securities are a relatively predictable source of funds, deposit flows, mortgage prepayments and loan sales are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

The primary investing activity of the Corporation is the origination and purchase of loans held for ~~investment and loans held for sale.~~investment. During the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018,~~2019, the Corporation originated and purchased ~~$573.4~~loans held for investment of $203.9 million and ~~$1.07 billion of loans, respectively. The total loans sold in the first nine months of fiscal 2019 and 2018 were $516.0 million and $968.3~~$120.0 million, respectively. At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Corporation had loan origination commitments totaling ~~$16.6~~$3.4 million, undisbursed lines of credit totaling $1.4 million and undisbursed construction loan funds totaling ~~$6.1~~$5.5 million. The Corporation anticipates that it will have sufficient funds available to meet its current loan commitments.

The ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s primary financing activity is gathering deposits. During the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, the net decrease in deposits was ~~$30.7~~$5.4 million or ~~three~~one percent, primarily due to ~~non-renewing scheduled maturities~~a decrease in time deposits. ~~The decrease in time deposits was consistent with the Corporation's operating strategy.~~ Time deposits decreased ~~$27.4~~$7.5 million, or 12four percent, to ~~$210.2~~$185.6 million at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~$237.6~~$193.1 million at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, time deposits with a principal amount of $250,000 or less and scheduled to mature in one year or less were ~~$93.5~~$74.5 million and total time deposits with a principal amount of more than $250,000 and scheduled to mature in one year or less were ~~$22.8~~$27.2 million. Historically, the Corporation has been able to retain a significant percentage of its time deposits as they mature.

The Corporation must maintain an adequate level of liquidity to ensure the availability of sufficient funds to support loan growth and deposit withdrawals, to satisfy financial commitments and to take advantage of investment opportunities. The Corporation generally maintains sufficient cash and cash equivalents to meet short-term liquidity needs. At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, total cash and cash equivalents were ~~$61.5~~$84.3 million, or ~~five~~eight percent of total assets. Depending on market conditions and the pricing of deposit products and FHLB – San Francisco advances, the Bank may rely on FHLB – San Francisco advances for part of its liquidity needs. As of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, total borrowings were ~~$101.1~~$131.1 million and the financing availability at FHLB – San Francisco was limited to 35 percent of total assets; the remaining borrowing facility available was ~~$280.9~~$244.1 million and the remaining available collateral was ~~$485.7~~$389.9 million. In addition, the Bank has secured ~~an $80.5~~a $47.4 million discount window facility at the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, collateralized by investment securities with a fair market value of ~~$85.6~~$50.4 million. As of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Bank also has a borrowing arrangement in the form of a federal funds facility with its correspondent bank for $17.0 million that matures on June 30, ~~2019~~2020 which the Bank intends to renew upon maturity. The Bank had no advances under its correspondent bank or discount window facility as of March 31, ~~2019.~~2020.

Regulations require thrifts to maintain adequate liquidity to assure safe and sound operations. The ~~Bank's~~Bank’s average liquidity ratio (defined as the ratio of average qualifying liquid assets to average deposits and borrowings) for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019 increased~~2020 decreased to ~~22.6~~14.8 percent from ~~14.9~~20.7 percent for the quarter ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

The Bank, as a federally-chartered, federally insured savings bank, is subject to the capital requirements established by the OCC. Under the OCC's capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank's assets, liabilities and certain off-balance-sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank's capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weighting and other factors.

At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Bank exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. The Bank was categorized "well-capitalized" at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 under the regulations of the OCC. As a bank holding company registered with the Federal Reserve, Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. is subject to the capital adequacy requirements of the Federal Reserve. For a bank holding company with less than $3.0 billion in assets, the capital guidelines apply on a bank only basis, and the Federal Reserve expects the holding ~~company's~~company’s subsidiary bank to be well capitalized under the prompt corrective action regulations. If Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. were subject to regulatory capital guidelines for bank holding companies with $3.0 billion or more in assets at March 31, 2019, Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. would have exceeded all regulatory capital requirements. The regulatory capital ratios calculated for Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. at March 31, 2019 were 10.81% for Tier 1 leverage-based capital, 18.32% for Tier 1 risk-based capital, 19.42% for total risk-based capital, and 18.32% for common equity Tier 1 ("CET1") capital ratio.

The Bank's actual and required minimum capital amounts and ratios at the dates indicated are as follows (dollars in thousands):

					Regulatory Requirements
	Actual				Minimum for Capital Adequacy Purposes ⁽¹⁾				Minimum to Be Well Capitalized
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio

Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B.:

As of March 31, 2020
Tier 1 leverage capital (to adjusted average assets)	$	114,967	10.36	%	$	44,398	4.00	%	$	55,498	5.00	%
CET1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	114,967	17.26	%	$	46,624	7.00	%	$	43,294	6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	114,967	17.26	%	$	56,615	8.50	%	$	53,285	8.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	122,867	18.45	%	$	69,936	10.50	%	$	66,606	10.00	%

As of June 30, 2019
Tier 1 leverage capital (to adjusted average assets)	$	115,009	10.50	%	$	43,824	4.00	%	$	54,779	5.00	%
CET1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	115,009	18.00	%	$	44,730	7.00	%	$	41,535	6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	115,009	18.00	%	$	54,314	8.50	%	$	51,119	8.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	122,225	19.13	%	$	67,094	10.50	%	$	63,899	10.00	%

Regulatory Requirements
Actual
Minimum for Capital
Adequacy Purposes⁽¹⁾

Minimum to Be
Well Capitalized

Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio

Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B.:

As of March 31, 2019
Tier 1 leverage capital (to adjusted average assets) $ 113,906 10.17 % $ 44,779 4.00 % $ 55,974 5.00 %
CET1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 113,906 17.24 % $ 46,240 7.00 % $ 42,937 6.50 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 113,906 17.24 % $ 56,148 8.50 % $ 52,845 8.00 %
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 121,137 18.34 % $ 69,359 10.50 % $ 66,057 10.00 %

As of June 30, 2018
Tier 1 leverage capital (to adjusted average assets) $ 116,369 9.96 % $ 46,716 4.00 % $ 58,394 5.00 %
CET1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 116,369 16.81 % $ 44,125 6.38 % $ 44,990 6.50 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 116,369 16.81 % $ 54,507 7.88 % $ 55,372 8.00 %
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 123,911 17.90 % $ 68,350 9.88 % $ 69,215 10.00 %

⁽¹⁾

The dollar amounts and ratios include the capital conservation buffer consisting of 2.50% ~~and 1.875%~~ of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum levels at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018, respectively, except the~~2019 for CET1 capital, Tier 1 ~~leverage~~ capital ~~dollar amounts~~ and ~~ratios.~~Total capital.

In addition to the minimum CET1, Tier 1 and ~~total~~Total capital ratios, the Bank is required to maintain a capital conservation buffer consisting of additional CET1 capital greater than 2.5% of risk-weighted assets above the required minimum levels in order to avoid limitations on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying discretionary ~~bonuses based on percentages of eligible retained income that could be utilized for such actions. As of~~bonuses. At March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the ~~Bank's capital conservation buffer~~Bank was ~~10.34% as filed~~ in ~~the Call Report~~compliance with ~~the OCC.~~this requirement.

The ability of the Corporation to pay dividends to stockholders depends primarily on the ability of the Bank to pay dividends to the Corporation. The Bank may not declare or pay a cash dividend if the effect thereof would cause its net worth to be reduced below the regulatory capital requirements imposed by federal regulation. In the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019,~~2020, the Bank paid a cash dividend of $7.5 million to the ~~Corporation;~~Corporation, while the Corporation paid $3.1 million of cash dividends to its shareholders.

Supplemental Information

	At March 31, 2019		At June 30, 2018		At March 31, 2018		At March 31, 2020	At June 30, 2019	At March 31, 2019

Loans serviced for others (in thousands)	$	123,049	$	128,409	$	128,060	$94,948	$120,236	$123,049

Book value per share	$	16.17	$	16.23	$	16.16	$16.56	$16.12	$16.17

ITEM 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

One of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s principal financial objectives is to achieve long-term profitability while reducing its exposure to fluctuating interest rates. The Corporation has sought to reduce the exposure of its earnings to changes in interest rates by attempting to manage the repricing mismatch between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The principal element in achieving this objective is to increase the interest-rate sensitivity of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s interest-earning assets by retaining for its portfolio new loan originations with interest rates subject to periodic adjustment to market ~~conditions and by selling fixed-rate, single-family mortgage loans.~~conditions. In addition, the Corporation maintains an investment portfolio, which is largely in U.S. government agency MBS and U.S. government sponsored enterprise MBS with contractual maturities of up to 30 years that reprice frequently or have a relatively short-average life. The Corporation relies on retail deposits as its primary source of funds while utilizing FHLB – San Francisco advances as a secondary source of funding. Management believes retail deposits, unlike brokered deposits, reduces the effects of interest rate fluctuations because they generally represent a more stable source of funds. As part of its interest rate risk management strategy, the Corporation promotes transaction accounts and time deposits with terms up to seven years.

Through the use of an internal interest rate risk model, the Corporation is able to analyze its interest rate risk exposure by measuring the change in net portfolio value ~~("NPV"~~(“NPV”) over a variety of interest rate scenarios. NPV is defined as the net present value of expected future cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts. The calculation is intended to illustrate the change in NPV that would occur in the event of an immediate change in interest rates of ~~-200,~~ -100, +100, +200 and +300 basis points ~~("bp"~~(“bp”) with no effect given to steps that management might take to counter the effect of the interest rate movement. ~~The current federal funds rate is 2.50 percent~~As of March 31, 2020, the targeted Federal Funds Rate range was 0.00% to 0.25%, making an immediate change of ~~-300~~-200 basis points or more improbable.

The following table is derived from the internal interest rate risk model and represents the NPV based on the indicated changes in interest rates as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 (dollars in thousands).

Basis Points ("bp")
Change in Rates

Net
Portfolio
Value

NPV
Change ⁽¹⁾

Portfolio
Value of
Assets

NPV as Percentage
of Portfolio Value
Assets ⁽²⁾

Sensitivity
Measure ⁽³⁾

+300bp $ 221,787 $ 98,304 $ 1,210,431 18.32% +740bp
+200bp $ 192,959 $ 69,476 $ 1,187,516 16.25% +533bp
+100bp $ 159,617 $ 36,134 $ 1,160,287 13.76% +284bp
0bp $ 123,483 $ — $ 1,130,483 10.92% 0bp
-100bp $ 113,761 $ (9,722 $ 1,121,186 10.15% -77bp
-200bp $ 127,904 $ 4,421 $ 1,135,758 11.26% +34bp

Basis Points ("bp") Change in Rates	Net Portfolio Value		NPV Change ⁽¹⁾			Portfolio Value of Assets		NPV as Percentage of Portfolio Value Assets ⁽²⁾	Sensitivity Measure ⁽³⁾
+300 bp	$	241,011	$	105,599		$	1,223,404	19.70%	+777 bp
+200 bp	$	213,906	$	78,494		$	1,201,918	17.80%	+587 bp
+100 bp	$	182,268	$	46,856		$	1,176,074	15.50%	+357 bp
0 bp	$	135,412	$	—		$	1,135,193	11.93%	0 bp
-100 bp	$	127,070	$	(8,342	)	$	1,125,416	11.29%	-64 bp

⁽¹⁾	Represents the increase (decrease) of the NPV at the indicated interest rate change in comparison to the NPV at March 31, ~~2019 ("~~2020 (“base ~~case"~~case”).

⁽²⁾	Derived from the NPV divided by the portfolio value of total assets.

⁽³⁾	Derived from the change in the NPV ratio from the base case amount assuming the indicated change in interest rates (expressed in basis points).

The following table is derived from the internal interest rate risk model and represents the change in the NPV at a -100 basis point rate shock at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

	At March 31, 2020	At June 30, 2019
	(-100 bp rate shock)	(-100 bp rate shock)
Pre-Shock NPV Ratio: NPV as a % of PV Assets	11.93%	11.80%
Post-Shock NPV Ratio: NPV as a % of PV Assets	11.29%	10.67%
Sensitivity Measure: Change in NPV Ratio	-64 bp	-113 bp

At March 31, 2019 At June 30, 2018
(-100 bp rate shock) (-100 bp rate shock)
Pre-Shock NPV Ratio: NPV as a % of PV Assets 10.92% 10.24%
Post-Shock NPV Ratio: NPV as a % of PV Assets 10.15% 9.62%
Sensitivity Measure: Change in NPV Ratio -77 bp -62 bp
67

The pre-shock NPV ratio increased 6813 basis points to ~~10.92~~11.93 percent at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~10.24~~11.80 percent at June 30, ~~2018~~2019 and the post-shock NPV ratio increased 5362 basis points to ~~10.15~~11.29 percent at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 from ~~9.62~~10.67 percent at June 30, ~~2018.~~2019. The increase of the NPV ratios was primarily attributable to net income in the first nine months of fiscal ~~2019~~2020 and ~~a higher net valuation of total assets~~the change in ~~comparison to total liabilities,~~interest rates, partly offset by a $7.5 million cash dividend distribution from the Bank to Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. in September ~~2018.~~2019.

As with any method of measuring interest rate risk, certain shortcomings are inherent in the method of analysis presented in the foregoing tables. For example, although certain assets and liabilities may have similar maturities or periods to repricing, they may react in different degrees to changes in market interest rates. Also, the interest rates on certain types of assets and liabilities may fluctuate in advance of changes in market interest rates, while interest rates on other types of assets and liabilities may lag behind changes in market interest rates. Additionally, certain assets, such as ARM loans, have features that restrict changes in interest rates on a short-term basis and over the life of the asset. Further, in the event of a change in interest rates, expected rates of prepayments on loans and early withdrawals from time deposits could likely deviate significantly from those assumed when calculating the results described in the tables above. It is also possible that, as a result of an interest rate increase, the higher mortgage payments required from ARM borrowers could result in an increase in delinquencies and defaults. ~~Changes in market interest rates may also affect the volume and profitability of the Corporation's mortgage banking operations.~~ Accordingly, the data presented in the tables in this section should not be relied upon as indicative of actual results in the event of changes in interest rates. Furthermore, the NPV presented in the foregoing tables is not intended to present the fair market value of the Corporation, nor does it represent amounts that would be available for distribution to shareholders in the event of the liquidation of the Corporation.

The Corporation measures and evaluates the potential effects of interest rate movements through an interest rate sensitivity "gap" analysis. Interest rate sensitivity reflects the potential effect on net interest income when there is movement in interest rates. For loans, securities and liabilities with contractual maturities, the table presents contractual repricing or scheduled maturity. For transaction accounts (checking, money market and savings deposits) that have no contractual maturity, the table presents estimated principal cash flows and, as applicable, the Corporation's historical experience, management's judgment and statistical analysis concerning their most likely withdrawal behaviors.

The following table represents the interest rate gap analysis of the Corporation's assets and liabilities as of March 31, ~~2019:~~2020:

			Term to Contractual Repricing, Estimated Repricing, or Contractual Maturity ⁽¹⁾
			As of March 31, 2020
(Dollars In Thousands)			12 months or less			Greater than 1 year to 3 years			Greater than 3 years to 5 years			Greater than 5 years or non-sensitive			Total

Repricing Assets:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	78,704		$	—		$	—		$	5,546		$	84,250
	Investment securities		23,996			—			—			50,314			74,310
	Loans held for investment		282,877			234,992			296,946			99,492			914,307
	FHLB - San Francisco stock		8,199			—			—			—			8,199
	Other assets		3,292			—			—			23,209			26,501
		Total assets	397,068			234,992			296,946			178,561			1,107,567

Repricing Liabilities and Equity:
	Checking deposits - non-interest bearing		—			—			—			86,585			86,585
	Checking deposits - interest bearing		40,558			81,117			81,117			67,597			270,389
	Savings deposits		52,332			104,664			104,663			—			261,659
	Money market deposits		15,788			15,787			—			—			31,575
	Time deposits		101,667			63,055			20,102			799			185,623
	Borrowings		20,000			51,063			50,007			10,000			131,070
	Other liabilities		339			—			—			17,169			17,508
	Stockholders' equity		—			—			—			123,158			123,158
		Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	230,684			315,686			255,889			305,308			1,107,567

Repricing gap positive (negative)			$	166,384		$	(80,694	)	$	41,057		$	(126,747	)	$	—
Cumulative repricing gap:
	Dollar amount		$	166,384		$	85,690		$	126,747		$	—		$	—
	Percent of total assets		15		%	8		%	11		%	—		%	—		%

Term to Contractual Repricing, Estimated Repricing, or Contractual
Maturity ⁽¹⁾

As of March 31, 2019
(Dollars In Thousands)
12 months or
less

Greater than
1 year to 3
years

Greater than
3 years to 5
years

Greater than
5 years or
non-sensitive
Total

Repricing Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 54,980 $ — $ — $ 6,478 $ 61,458
Investment securities 34,768 200 — 73,836 108,804
Loans held for investment 272,770 233,125 284,781 92,878 883,554
Loans held for sale 30,500 — — — 30,500
FHLB - San Francisco stock 8,199 — — — 8,199
Other assets 3,387 — — 23,493 26,880
Total assets 404,604 233,325 284,781 196,685 1,119,395

Repricing Liabilities and Equity:
Checking deposits - non-interest bearing — — — 90,875 90,875
Checking deposits - interest bearing 40,447 80,894 80,894 67,413 269,648
Savings deposits 54,394 108,788 108,789 — 271,971
Money market deposits 17,115 17,114 — — 34,229
Time deposits 116,331 69,668 23,446 716 210,161
Borrowings — 41,121 40,000 20,000 101,121
Other liabilities 335 — — 19,846 20,181
Stockholders' equity — — — 121,209 121,209
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity 228,622 317,585 253,129 320,059 1,119,395

Repricing gap positive (negative) $ 175,982 $ (84,260 ) $ 31,652 $ (123,374 ) $ —
Cumulative repricing gap:
Dollar amount $ 175,982 $ 91,722 $ 123,374 $ — $ —
Percent of total assets 16 % 8 % 11 % — % — %

⁽¹⁾ Cash and cash equivalents are presented as estimated repricing; investment securities and loans held for investment are presented as contractual maturities or contractual repricing (without consideration for prepayments); ~~loans held for sale and transaction accounts are presented as estimated repricing;~~ FHLB - San Francisco stock is presented as contractual repricing; transaction accounts (checking, savings and money market deposits) are presented as estimated repricing; while time deposits (without consideration for early withdrawals) and borrowings are presented as contractual maturities.

The static gap analysis shows a positive position in the ~~"Cumulative~~"cumulative repricing gap - dollar amount" category, indicating more assets are sensitive to repricing than liabilities. Management views non-interest bearing deposits to be the least sensitive to

changes in market interest rates and these accounts are therefore characterized as long-term funding. Interest-bearing checking deposits are considered more sensitive, followed by increased sensitivity for savings and money market deposits. For the purpose of calculating gap, a portion of these interest-bearing deposit balances are assumed to be subject to estimated repricing as follows: interest-bearing checking deposits at 15% per year, savings deposits at 20% per year and money market deposits at 50% in the first and second years.

The gap results presented above could vary substantially if different assumptions are used or if actual experience differs from the assumptions used in the preparation of the gap analysis. Furthermore, the gap analysis provides a static view of interest rate risk exposure at a specific point in time without taking into account redirection of cash flows activity and deposit fluctuations.

The extent to which the net interest margin will be impacted by changes in prevailing interest rates will depend on a number of factors, including how quickly interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities react to interest rate changes. It is not uncommon for rates on certain assets or liabilities to lag behind changes in the market rates of interest. Additionally, prepayments of loans and early withdrawals of certificates of deposit could cause interest sensitivities to vary. As a result, the relationship between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, as shown in the previous table, is only a general indicator of interest rate sensitivity and the effect of changing rates of interest on net interest income is likely to be different from that predicted solely on the basis of the interest rate sensitivity analysis set forth in the previous table.

The Corporation also models the sensitivity of net interest income for the 12-month period subsequent to any given month-end assuming a dynamic balance sheet accounting for, among other items:

◾	The Corporation’s current balance sheet and repricing characteristics;

~~The Corporation's current balance sheet and repricing characteristics;~~

◾	Forecast balance sheet growth consistent with the business plan;

~~Forecasted balance sheet growth consistent with the business plan;~~

◾	Current interest rates and yield curves and management estimates of projected interest rates;

~~Current interest rates and yield curves and management estimates of projected interest rates;~~

◾	Embedded options, interest rate floors, periodic caps and lifetime caps;

~~Embedded options, interest rate floors, periodic caps and lifetime caps;~~

◾	Repricing characteristics for market rate sensitive instruments;

~~Repricing characteristics for market rate sensitive instruments;~~

◾	Loan, investment, deposit and borrowing cash flows;

~~Loan, investment, deposit and borrowing cash flows;~~

◾	Loan prepayment estimates for each type of loan; and

~~Loan prepayment estimates for each type of loan; and~~

~~Immediate, permanent and parallel movements in interest rates of plus 300, 200 and 100 and minus 100 and 200 basis points.~~

◾	Immediate, permanent and parallel movements in interest rates of plus 300, 200 and 100 and minus 100 and 200 basis points.

The following table describes the results of the analysis at March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018.~~2019.

At March 31, 2019		At June 30, 2018
At March 31, 2020				At March 31, 2020	At June 30, 2019
Basis Point (bp) Change in Rates	Change in Net Interest Income	Basis Point (bp) Change in Rates	Change in Net Interest Income	Change in Net Interest Income	Basis Point (bp) Change in Rates	Change in Net Interest Income
+300 bp	6.50%	+300 bp	6.83%	6.84%	+300 bp	6.85%
+200 bp	6.04%	+200 bp	5.73%	2.43%	+200 bp	4.39%
+100 bp	5.00%	+100 bp	4.53%	(1.15)%	+100 bp	2.36%
-100 bp	(5.86)%	-100 bp	(3.98)%	(2.43)%	-100 bp	(3.63)%
-200 bp	(12.21)%	-200 bp	(10.61)%

At March 31, ~~2019~~2020 and June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, the Corporation was asset sensitive as its interest-earning assets at those dates are expected to reprice more quickly than its interest-bearing liabilities during the subsequent 12-month period. Therefore, in a rising interest rate environment, the model projects an increase in net interest income over the subsequent 12-month ~~period.~~period (except under the +100 basis point shock scenario at March 31, 2020). In a falling interest rate environment, the results project a decrease in net interest income over the subsequent 12-month period.

Management believes that the assumptions used to complete the analysis described in the table above are reasonable. However, past experience has shown that immediate, permanent and parallel movements in interest rates will not necessarily

occur. Additionally, while the analysis provides a tool to evaluate the projected net interest income to changes in interest rates, actual results may be substantially different if actual experience differs from the assumptions used to complete the analysis, particularly with respect to the 12-month business plan when asset growth is forecast. Therefore, the model results that the Corporation discloses should be thought of as a risk management tool to compare the trends of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s current disclosure to previous disclosures, over time, within the context of the actual performance of the treasury yield curve.

ITEM 4 – Controls and Procedures.

a) An evaluation of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Section 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ~~"Act"~~“Act”)) was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Disclosure Committee as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. In designing and evaluating the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Also, because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Corporation have been detected. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Based on their evaluation, the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, ~~2019~~2020 are effective, at the reasonable assurance level, in ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the Corporation in the reports it files or submits under the Act is (i) accumulated and communicated to the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s management (including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer) in a timely manner, and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the ~~SEC's~~SEC’s rules and forms.

b) There have been no changes in the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Act) that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting. The Corporation does not expect that its internal control over financial reporting will prevent all error and all fraud. A control procedure, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control procedure are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control procedures, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Corporation have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any control procedure is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control procedure, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

There have been no material changes in the legal proceedings previously disclosed in Part I, Item 3 of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, ~~2018,~~2019, except as follows.

On November 13, 2018, the presiding Court approved the motion for final approval of the settlement agreement in the two class and collective action lawsuits filed by Gina McKeen-Chaplin and Neal, respectively, against the Bank. The settlement funds have been distributed to the plaintiffs and plaintiff's counsel consistent with the settlement agreements. On April 8,July 24, 2019, ~~the presiding Court signed an order closing and dismissing the cases.~~

~~On December 20, 2018, counsel in the lawsuit known as Cannon vs. the Bank filed a Motion for Preliminary Approval of the Settlement in~~ the California Superior Court for the County of San ~~Bernardino. On April 12, 2019, this Court~~Bernardino, California granted ~~preliminary~~final approval of the settlement in the Cannon vs. Bank lawsuit. On July 26, 2019, the final order was signed by this court and ~~set~~on August 6, 2019, the Bank forwarded the settlement amount to the class administrator. The total settlement was reduced to $2.5 million from $2.8 million, resulting in a ~~tentative date for a hearing on final approval for July 24, 2019,~~$296,000 settlement expense recovery which ~~presumes~~was recognized in the ~~notice and claim process will be completed by then.~~first quarter of fiscal 2020.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

~~Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes in~~In light of recent developments relating to Coronavirus Disease 2019 (“COVID-19”), the Corporation is supplementing its risk factors ~~previously disclosed~~contained in ~~Part I,~~ Item 1A of ~~the Corporation's~~its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, ~~2018.~~2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 30, 2019. The following risk factor should be read in conjunction with the risk factors described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2019.

The ~~discontinuation~~COVID-19 pandemic has adversely impacted our ability to conduct business and is expected to adversely impact our financial results and those of our ~~mortgage~~customers. The ultimate impact will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including the scope and duration of the pandemic and actions taken by governmental authorities in response to the pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly adversely affected our operations and the way we provide banking ~~segment~~services to businesses and individuals, most of whom are currently under government issued stay-at-home orders. As an essential business, we continue to provide banking and financial services to our customers with in-person and drive-thru access available at the majority of our branch locations. In addition, we continue to provide access to banking and financial services through online banking, ATMs and by telephone. If the COVID-19 pandemic worsens it could limit or disrupt our ability to provide banking and financial services to our customers.

In response to the stay-at-home orders, some of our employees currently are working remotely to enable us to continue to provide banking services to our customers. Heightened cybersecurity, information security and operational risks may result from these remote work-from-home arrangements. We also could be adversely affected if key personnel or a significant number of employees were to become unavailable due to the effects and restrictions of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also rely upon our third-party vendors to conduct business and to process, record and monitor transactions. If any of these vendors are unable to continue to provide us with these services, it could negatively impact our ability to serve our customers. Although we have business continuity plans and other safeguards in place, there is no assurance that such plans and safeguards will be effective.

There is pervasive uncertainty surrounding the future economic conditions that will emerge in the months and years following the start of the pandemic. As a result, management is confronted with a significant and unfamiliar degree of uncertainty in estimating the impact of the pandemic on credit quality, revenues and asset values. To date, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in declines in loan demand and loan originations, deposit availability, market interest rates and negatively impacted many of our business and consumer borrower’s ability to make their loan payments. Because the length of the pandemic and the efficacy of the extraordinary measures being put in place to address its economic consequences are unknown, including recent reductions in the targeted Federal Funds Rate, until the pandemic subsides, we expect our net interest income and net interest margin will be adversely affected in the near term, if not longer. Many of our borrowers have become unemployed or may face unemployment, and certain businesses are at risk of insolvency as their revenues decline precipitously, especially in businesses related to travel, hospitality, leisure and physical personal services. Businesses may ultimately not reopen as there is a significant level of uncertainty regarding the level of economic activity that will return to our markets over time, the impact of governmental assistance, the speed of economic recovery, the resurgence of COVID-19 in subsequent seasons and changes to demographic and social norms that will take place.

The impact of the pandemic is expected to continue to adversely affect us during 2020 and possibly longer as the ability of many of our customers to make loan payments has been significantly affected. Although the Corporation makes estimates of loan losses related to the pandemic as part of its evaluation of the allowance for loan losses, such estimates involve significant judgment and are made in the context of significant uncertainty as to the impact the pandemic will have on the credit quality of our loan portfolio. It is likely that increased loan delinquencies, adversely classified loans and loan charge-offs will increase in the future as a result of the pandemic. Consistent with guidance provided by banking regulators, we have modified loans by providing various loan payment deferral options to our borrowers affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Notwithstanding these modifications, these borrowers may not be able to resume making full payments on their loans once the COVID-19 pandemic is

resolved. Any increases in the allowance for credit losses will result in a decrease in net income and, most likely, capital, and may have a material negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

~~On February 4, 2019,~~Even after the COVID-19 pandemic subsides, the U.S. economy will likely require some time to recover from its effects, the length of which is unknown, and during which we ~~announced the discontinuation of our mortgage banking segment conducted through Provident Bank Mortgage,~~may experience a ~~division of Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B. by June 30, 2019.~~recession. As a result, we ~~expect to incur one-time costs~~anticipate our business may be materially and adversely affected during this recovery. To the extent the effects of ~~approximately $3.6 million to $4.0 million during~~ the ~~remainder~~COVID-19 pandemic adversely impact our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of ~~fiscal 2019. It~~operations, it may ~~take longer than we expect to complete~~also have the ~~winding down~~effect of ~~this business and we may incur costs that exceed our estimated costs. Although we anticipate~~heightening many of the ~~elimination of quarterly pre-tax losses from~~other risks described in the ~~mortgage banking segment and further anticipate increases~~section entitled "Risk Factors" in our ~~pre-tax income of $1.2 million per quarter as a result of~~Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~discontinuation of the mortgage banking business, no assurance can be given as to when or whether we will realize these benefits.~~year ended June 30, 2019 and any subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The table below represents the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s purchases of its equity securities for the third quarter of fiscal ~~2019.~~2020.

Period
(a) Total
Number of
Shares Purchased

(b) Average
Price Paid
per Share

(c) Total Number of
Shares Purchased as
Part of Publicly
Announced Plan

(d) Maximum
Number of Shares
that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the
Plan ⁽¹⁾
January 1 – 31, 2019 — $ — — 373,000
February 1 – 28, 2019 11,941 $ 18.69 11,941 361,059
March 1 – 31, 2019 11,807 $ 20.05 11,807 349,252
Total 23,748 $ 19.36 23,748 349,252

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid per Share		(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plan	(d) Maximum Number of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plan ⁽¹⁾
January 1 – 31, 2020	1,263	$	22.13	1,263	300,453
February 1 – 29, 2020	20,148	$	21.28	20,148	280,305
March 1 – 31, 2020	25,345	$	16.95	25,345	254,960
Total	46,756	$	18.95	46,756	254,960

⁽¹⁾	Represents the remaining shares available for future purchases under the April 2018 stock repurchase plan.

During the quarter ~~and nine months~~ ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Corporation purchased ~~23,748~~46,756 shares of the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s common stock at an average cost of ~~$19.36~~$18.95 per share. For the nine months ended March 31, 2020, the Corporation purchased 66,041 shares of the Corporation’s common stock at an average cost of $19.43 per share. As of March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, a total of ~~23,748~~118,040 shares or ~~six~~32 percent of the shares authorized in the April 2018 stock repurchase plan ~~have been~~were purchased at an average cost of ~~$19.36~~$19.57 per share, leaving ~~349,252~~254,960 shares available for ~~future purchases.~~purchase until the plan expires on April 26, 2020. During the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, there were no stock options or restricted stock activity. For the ~~Corporation issued 11,250~~nine months ended March 31, 2020, a total of 16,250 shares of ~~common stock consistent the exercise of certain~~ stock options were exercised and ~~3,000~~a total of 8,000 shares of restricted ~~common~~stock were forfeited, while no shares of restricted stock vested. The ~~Company~~Corporation did not purchase any shares from recipients to fund their withholding tax obligations in the third quarter ~~of fiscal 2019. For the nine months ended March 31, 2019, the Corporation issued 31,250 shares of common stock consistent with the exercise of certain stock options~~ and ~~89,500 shares of restricted common stock vested. The Company purchased 21,071 shares at an average price of $18.28 per share from recipients to fund their withholding tax obligations in the~~ first nine months of fiscal ~~2019.~~2020. During the quarter and nine months ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, the Corporation did not sell any securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibits:

3.1 (a)	Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. as filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on November 24, 2009 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on November 9, 2010)

3.1 (b)	Amended and Restated Bylaws of Provident Financial Holdings, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 1, 2014)

~~10.1~~ 4.1	~~Employment Agreement with Craig G. Blunden~~Form of Certificate of Provident's Common Stock (incorporated by reference to ~~Exhibit 10.1 to~~ the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form ~~8-K dated December 19, 2005)~~ S-1 (333-2230) filed on March 11, 1996))

~~10.2~~	~~Post-Retirement Compensation Agreement with Craig G. Blunden (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Corporation's Form 8-K dated December 19, 2005)~~

~~10.3~~	~~Post-Retirement Compensation Agreement with Donavon P. Ternes (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Corporation's Form 8-K dated July 7, 2009)~~

~~10.4~~	Form of Severance Agreement with Deborah L. Hill, Robert "Scott" Ritter, Lilian Salter, Donavon P. Ternes, David S. Weiant and Gwendolyn L. Wertz (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the Corporation's Form 8-K dated February 24, 2012)

~~10.5~~	~~2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Corporation's proxy statement dated October 12, 2006)~~

~~10.6~~	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 in the Corporation's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006)

~~10.7~~	Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 in the Corporation's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006)

~~10.8~~	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for restricted shares awarded under the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 in the Corporation's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 2006)

~~10.9~~	~~2010 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Corporation's proxy statement dated October 28, 2010)~~

~~10.10~~	~~Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in the Corporation's Form 8-K dated November 30, 2010)~~

~~10.11~~	~~Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in the Corporation's Form 8-K dated November 30, 2010)~~

~~10.12~~	~~Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for restricted shares awarded under the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 in the Corporation's Form 8-K dated November 30, 2010)~~

~~10.13~~	~~2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Corporation's proxy statement dated October 24, 2013)~~

~~10.14~~	Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in the Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-192727) dated December 9, 2013)

~~10.15~~	Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement for options granted under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 in the Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-192727) dated December 9, 2013)

~~10.16~~	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement for restricted shares awarded under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 in the Corporation's Registration Statement on Form S-8 (333-192727) dated December 9, 2013)

~~31.1~~	~~Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~

~~31.2~~	~~Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~

~~32.1~~	~~Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~

~~32.2~~	~~Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~

~~101~~	The following materials from the Corporation's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition; (2) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations; (3) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (4) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity; (5) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (6) Selected Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~SIGNATURES~~

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	~~Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.~~



~~Date: May 9, 2019~~	~~/s/ Craig G. Blunden~~
	~~Craig G. Blunden~~
	~~Chairman and Chief Executive Officer~~ ~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~



~~Date: May 9, 2019~~	~~/s/ Donavon P. Ternes~~
	~~Donavon P. Ternes~~
	~~President, Chief Operating Officer and~~ ~~Chief Financial Officer~~ ~~(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)~~

~~Exhibit Index~~

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101	The following materials from the ~~Corporation's~~Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, ~~2019,~~2020, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (1) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition; (2) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations; (3) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive ~~Income;~~Income (Loss); (4) Condensed Consolidated Statements of ~~Stockholders'~~Stockholders’ Equity; (5) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; and (6) Selected Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

	Provident Financial Holdings, Inc.



Date: May 8, 2020	/s/ Craig G. Blunden
	Craig G. Blunden
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)



Date: May 8, 2020	/s/ Donavon P. Ternes
	Donavon P. Ternes
	President, Chief Operating Officer and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

	For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2019
(In Thousands)	Provident Bank			Provident Bank Mortgage			Consolidated Totals
Net interest income	$	9,431		$	181		$	9,612
Provision (recovery) for loan losses		74			(70	)		4
Net interest income, after provision (recovery) for loan losses		9,357			251			9,608

Non-interest income:
Loan servicing and other fees ⁽¹⁾		103			159			262
Gain (loss) on sale of loans, net ⁽²⁾		(1	)		1,720			1,719
Deposit account fees		471			—			471
Gain on sale and operations of real estate owned acquired in the settlement of loans, net		2			—			2
Card and processing fees		373			—			373
Other		223			2			225
Total non-interest income		1,171			1,881			3,052

Non-interest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		5,002			4,290			9,292
Premises and occupancy		847			439			1,286
Operating and administrative expenses		1,314			1,108			2,422
Total non-interest expense		7,163			5,837			13,000
Income (loss) before income taxes		3,365			(3,705	)		(340	)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		907			(1,096	)		(189	)
Net income (loss)	$	2,458		$	(2,609	)	$	(151	)
Total assets, end of period	$	1,088,716		$	30,679		$	1,119,395

	For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2018
(In Thousands)	Provident Bank			Provident Bank Mortgage			Consolidated Totals
Net interest income	$	8,750		$	374		$	9,124
Recovery from the allowance for loan losses		(505	)		—			(505	)
Net interest income, after recovery from the allowance for loan losses		9,255			374			9,629

Non-interest income:
Loan servicing and other fees ⁽¹⁾		313			180			493
Gain (loss) on sale of loans, net ⁽²⁾		(1	)		3,598			3,597
Deposit account fees		529			—			529
Loss on sale and operations of real estate owned acquired in the settlement of loans, net		(19	)		—			(19	)
Card and processing fees		372			—			372
Other		238			—			238
Total non-interest income		1,432			3,778			5,210

Non-interest expense:
Salaries and employee benefits		4,763			4,045			8,808
Premises and occupancy		842			413			1,255
Operating and administrative expenses		1,050			1,326			2,376
Total non-interest expense		6,655			5,784			12,439
Income (loss) before income taxes		4,032			(1,632	)		2,400
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		1,252			(585	)		667
Net income (loss)	$	2,780		$	(1,047	)	$	1,733
Total assets, end of period	$	1,086,437		$	90,165		$	1,176,602

	Quarter Ended March 31, 2018
(In Thousands)	Single- family			Multi- family			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Commercial Business			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance at beginning of period	$	3,303		$	3,295		$	933		$	504		$	32		$	8		$	8,075
Provision (recovery) for loan losses		(143	)		17			33			(410	)		(1	)		(1	)		(505	)
Recoveries		71			—			—			—			—			—			71
Charge-offs		(110	)		—			—			—			—			—			(110	)
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	3,121		$	3,312		$	966		$	94		$	31		$	7		$	7,531

Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	161		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	15		$	—		$	176
Collectively evaluated for impairment		2,960			3,312			966			94			16			7			7,355
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	3,121		$	3,312		$	966		$	94		$	31		$	7		$	7,531

Loans held for investment:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	7,929		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	73		$	—		$	8,002
Collectively evaluated for impairment		308,983			466,266			106,937			5,324			377			130			888,017
Total loans held for investment, gross	$	316,912		$	466,266		$	106,937		$	5,324		$	450		$	130		$	896,019
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment		0.98	%		0.71	%		0.90	%		1.77	%		6.89	%		5.38	%		0.84	%

	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2018
(In Thousands)	Single- family			Multi- family			Commercial Real Estate			Construction			Commercial Business			Consumer			Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Allowance at beginning of period	$	3,601		$	3,420		$	879		$	96		$	36		$	7		$	8,039
Provision (recovery) for loan losses		(319	)		(108	)		87			(2	)		(5	)		—			(347	)
Recoveries		203			—			—			—			—			—			203
Charge-offs		(364	)		—			—			—			—			—			(364	)
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	3,121		$	3,312		$	966		$	94		$	31		$	7		$	7,531

Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	161		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	15		$	—		$	176
Collectively evaluated for impairment		2,960			3,312			966			94			16			7			7,355
Allowance for loan losses, end of period	$	3,121		$	3,312		$	966		$	94		$	31		$	7		$	7,531

Loans held for investment:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	7,929		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	73		$	—		$	8,002
Collectively evaluated for impairment		308,983			466,266			106,937			5,324			377			130			888,017
Total loans held for investment, gross	$	316,912		$	466,266		$	106,937		$	5,324		$	450		$	130		$	896,019
Allowance for loan losses as a percentage of gross loans held for investment		0.98	%		0.71	%		0.90	%		1.77	%		6.89			5.38	%		0.84	%

(Dollars In Thousands)	Fair Value As of March 31, 2019		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Inputs	Range ⁽¹⁾ (Weighted Average)	Impact to Valuation from an Increase in Inputs ⁽²⁾

Assets:

Securities available - for sale: Private issue CMO	$	300	Market comparable pricing	Comparability adjustment	1.2% – 1.3% (1.2%)	Increase

Loans held for investment, at fair value	$	5,239	Relative value analysis	Broker quotes Credit risk factors	98.3% – 105.2% (101.1%) of par 1.2% - 100.0% (4.3%)	Increase Decrease

Non-performing loans	$	703	Discounted cash flow	Default rates	5.0%	Decrease
Non-performing loans	$	871	Relative value analysis	Loss severity	20.0% - 30.0% (21.3%)	Decrease

Mortgage servicing assets	$	456	Discounted cash flow	Prepayment speed (CPR) Discount rate	9.7% - 60.0% (21.7%) 9.0% - 10.5%(9.2%)	Decrease Decrease

Interest-only strips	$	18	Discounted cash flow	Prepayment speed (CPR) Discount rate	18.7% - 35.9% (34.3%) 9.0%	Decrease Decrease

Commitments to extend credit on loans to be held for sale	$	240	Relative value analysis	TBA-MBS broker quotes Fall-out ratio ⁽³⁾	99.0% – 103.4% (101.6%) of par 18.5% - 19.1% (18.6%)	Increase Decrease

Liabilities:

Mandatory loan sale commitments	$	7	Relative value analysis	TBA MBS broker quotes Roll-forward costs ⁽⁴⁾	102.3% - 105.7% (103.9%) of par 0.015%	Increase Increase

	For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2019
Options	Shares			Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000)
Outstanding at December 31, 2018		509,000		$	12.83
Granted		—		$	—
Exercised		(11,250	)	$	14.59
Forfeited		—		$	—
Outstanding at March 31, 2019		497,750		$	12.79		4.53		$	3,551
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2019		495,150		$	12.75		4.52		$	3,550
Exercisable at March 31, 2019		484,750		$	12.60		4.45		$	3,546

	For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2019
Unvested Shares	Shares			Weighted- Average Award Date Fair Value
Unvested at December 31, 2018		12,000		$	18.31
Granted		—		$	—
Vested		(3,000	)	$	18.90
Forfeited		—		$	—
Unvested at March 31, 2019		9,000		$	18.11
Expected to vest at March 31, 2019		7,200		$	18.11

Statutory Tax Rates	FY2019	FY2018
Federal Tax Rate	21.00%	28.06%
State Tax Rate	10.84%	10.84%
Combined Statutory Tax Rate ⁽¹⁾	29.56%	35.86%

(Dollars In Thousands)	Inland Empire					Southern California ⁽¹⁾					Other California					Other States					Total
Loan Category	Balance		%			Balance		%			Balance		%			Balance		%			Balance		%
Single-family	$	107,164		34	%	$	144,261		46	%	$	62,360		20	%	$	1,039		—	%	$	314,824		100	%
Multi-family		71,357		16	%		275,087		61	%		103,039		23	%		329		—	%		449,812		100	%
Commercial real estate		31,972		28	%		55,435		48	%		27,948		24	%		—		—	%		115,355		100	%
Construction		295		7	%		3,397		82	%		447		11	%		—		—	%		4,139		100	%
Other		—		—	%		—		—	%		167		100	%		—		—	%		167		100	%
Total	$	210,788		24	%	$	478,1801		54	%	$	193,961		22	%	$	1,368		—	%	$	884,297		100	%

	Quarter Ended March 31, 2019							Quarter Ended March 31, 2018
(Dollars In Thousands)	Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Cost			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Cost
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net ⁽¹⁾	$	915,049	$	10,011		4.38	%	$	961,826	$	9,933		4.13	%
Investment securities		101,851		592		2.32	%		99,390		382		1.54	%
FHLB – San Francisco stock		8,199		144		7.03	%		8,108		144		7.10	%
Interest-earning deposits		64,390		386		2.40	%		61,591		233		1.51	%

Total interest-earning assets		1,089,489		11,133		4.09	%		1,130,915		10,692		3.78	%

Non interest-earning assets		30,228							34,820

Total assets	$	1,119,717						$	1,165,735

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking and money market accounts ⁽²⁾	$	382,294	$	102		0.11	%	$	370,346	$	96		0.11	%
Savings accounts		274,400		139		0.21	%		293,579		147		0.20	%
Time deposits		216,558		600		1.12	%		248,104		613		1.00	%

Total deposits		873,252		841		0.39	%		912,029		856		0.38	%

Borrowings		105,793		680		2.61	%		112,625		712		2.56	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		979,045		1,521		0.63	%		1,024,654		1,568		0.62	%

Non interest-bearing liabilities		17,991							20,804

Total liabilities		997,036							1,045,458

Stockholders' equity		122,681							120,277
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,119,717						$	1,165,735

Net interest income			$	9,612						$	9,124

Interest rate spread ⁽³⁾						3.46	%						3.16	%
Net interest margin ⁽⁴⁾						3.53	%						3.23	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						111.28	%						110.37	%
Return (loss) on average assets						(0.05	)%						0.59	%
Return (loss) on average equity						(0.49	)%						5.76	%

	Nine Months Ended March 31, 2019							Nine Months Ended March 31, 2018
(Dollars In Thousands)	Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Cost			Average Balance		Interest		Yield/ Cost
Interest-earning assets:
Loans receivable, net ⁽¹⁾	$	941,336	$	30,516		4.32	%	$	986,952	$	29,825		4.03	%
Investment securities		95,494		1,381		1.93	%		87,710		958		1.46	%
FHLB – San Francisco stock		8,199		565		9.19	%		8,108		428		7.04	%
Interest-earning deposits		66,498		1,111		2.20	%		57,254		591		1.36	%

Total interest-earning assets		1,111,527		33,573		4.03	%		1,140,024		31,802		3.72	%

Non interest-earning assets		30,711							33,240

Total assets	$	1,142,238						$	1,173,264

Interest-bearing liabilities:
Checking and money market accounts ⁽²⁾	$	379,882	$	327		0.11	%	$	372,413	$	311		0.11	%
Savings accounts		281,814		437		0.21	%		290,065		445		0.20	%
Time deposits		226,978		1,851		1.09	%		254,653		1,877		0.98	%

Total deposits		888,674		2,615		0.39	%		917,131		2,633		0.38	%

Borrowings		112,363		2,158		2.56	%		112,766		2,176		2.57	%

Total interest-bearing liabilities		1,001,037		4,773		0.64	%		1,029,897		4,809		0.62	%

Non interest-bearing liabilities		19,306							19,174

Total liabilities		1,020,343							1,049,071

Stockholders' equity		121,895							124,193
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	1,142,238						$	1,173,264

Net interest income			$	28,800						$	26,993

Interest rate spread ⁽³⁾						3.39	%						3.10	%
Net interest margin ⁽⁴⁾						3.45	%						3.16	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities						111.04	%						110.69	%
Return on average assets						0.42	%						0.08	%
Return on average equity						3.97	%						0.78	%

(Dollars In Thousands)	Outstanding Balance ⁽¹⁾		Weighted- Average FICO ⁽²⁾		Weighted- Average LTV ⁽³⁾		Weighted- Average Seasoning ⁽⁴⁾
Interest only	$	1,500		619		75%	1.21 years
Stated income ⁽⁵⁾	$	56,323		733		58%	13.33 years
FICO less than or equal to 660	$	7,656		638		65%	8.22 years
Over 30-year amortization	$	7,528		726		63%	13.63 years

(Dollars In Thousands)	Balance		Non-Performing ⁽¹⁾		30 - 89 Days Delinquent ⁽¹⁾
Fully amortize in the next 12 months	$	1,500		—%		—%
Fully amortize between 1 year and 5 years		—		—%		—%
Fully amortize after 5 years		—		—%		—%
Total	$	1,500		—%		—%

(Dollars In Thousands)	Balance ⁽¹⁾		Non-Performing ⁽¹⁾		30 - 89 Days Delinquent ⁽¹⁾
Interest rate reset in the next 12 months	$	55,616		4%		1%
Interest rate reset between 1 year and 5 years		—		—%		—%
Interest rate reset after 5 years		707		100%		—%
Total	$	56,323		5%		1%

	Calendar Year of Origination
(Dollars In Thousands)	2011 & Prior		2012		2013		2014		2015		2016		2017		2018		YTD 2019		Total
Loan balance (in thousands)	$	93,005	$	1,937	$	1,681	$	5,127	$	8,812	$	28,554	$	67,035	$	81,516	$	14,985	$	302,652
Weighted-average LTV ⁽¹⁾		58%		53%		40%		62%		68%		63%		72%		70%		68%		65%
Weighted-average age (in years)		13.42		6.58		5.85		4.68		3.82		2.72		1.86		0.74		0.92		5.30
Weighted-average FICO ⁽²⁾		730		757		758		754		746		752		739		743		769		741
Number of loans		347		10		18		16		13		56		104		140		26		730

Geographic breakdown (%)
Inland Empire		37%		17%		56%		33%		18%		26%		33%		42%		9%		34%
Southern California ⁽³⁾		51%		52%		25%		38%		57%		34%		45%		50%		29%		47%
Other California ⁽⁴⁾		11%		31%		19%		29%		25%		40%		22%		8%		62%		19%
Other States		1%		—%		—%		—%		—%		—%		—%		—%		—%		—%
Total		100%		100%		100%		100%		100%		100%		100%		100%		100%		100%

(Dollars In Thousands)	Balance		Non- Performing ⁽¹⁾		30 - 89 Days Delinquent		Percentage Not Fully Amortizing ⁽¹⁾
Interest rate reset or mature in the next 12 months	$	132,835		—%		—%		7%
Interest rate reset or mature between 1 year and 5 years		302,422		—%		—%		1%
Interest rate reset or mature after 5 years		14,555		—%		—%		—%
Total	$	449,812		—%		—%		3%

(In Thousands)	At March 31, 2019			At June 30, 2018
Loans on non-accrual status (excluding restructured loans):
Mortgage loans:
Single-family	$	2,657		$	2,665
Construction		745			—
Total		3,402			2,665

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more		—			—

Restructured loans on non-accrual status:
Mortgage loans:
Single-family		2,669			3,328
Commercial business loans		44			64
Total		2,713			3,392

Total non-performing loans		6,115			6,057

Real estate owned, net		—			906
Total non-performing assets	$	6,115		$	6,963

Non-performing loans as a percentage of loans held for investment, net of allowance for loan losses		0.69	%		0.67	%

Non-performing loans as a percentage of total assets		0.55	%		0.52	%

Non-performing assets as a percentage of total assets		0.55	%		0.59	%

						Regulatory Requirements
	Actual					Minimum for Capital Adequacy Purposes⁽¹⁾					Minimum to Be Well Capitalized
	Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio			Amount		Ratio

Provident Savings Bank, F.S.B.:

As of March 31, 2019
Tier 1 leverage capital (to adjusted average assets)	$	113,906		10.17	%	$	44,779		4.00	%	$	55,974		5.00	%
CET1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	113,906		17.24	%	$	46,240		7.00	%	$	42,937		6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	113,906		17.24	%	$	56,148		8.50	%	$	52,845		8.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	121,137		18.34	%	$	69,359		10.50	%	$	66,057		10.00	%

As of June 30, 2018
Tier 1 leverage capital (to adjusted average assets)	$	116,369		9.96	%	$	46,716		4.00	%	$	58,394		5.00	%
CET1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	116,369		16.81	%	$	44,125		6.38	%	$	44,990		6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	116,369		16.81	%	$	54,507		7.88	%	$	55,372		8.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	$	123,911		17.90	%	$	68,350		9.88	%	$	69,215		10.00	%