SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
   
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2007June 30, 2008
Or
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from _________ to _________
Commission file number 001-07731
EMERSON RADIO CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
DELAWARE 22-3285224
 
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
9 Entin Road Parsippany, New Jersey 07054
 
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(973) 884-5800
 
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
(Former name, former address, and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.þ Yeso No
      Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
       
oLarge accelerated filero  Accelerated filero Accelerated filer  þNon-accelerated filer  o Smaller reporting company 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyþ
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).o Yesþ No
     Indicate the number of shares outstanding of common stock as of February 12,August 14, 2008: 27,129,832.
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
     
  3 
  3 
  12 
  17 
  17 
  1918 
  1918 
  1918 
  1918 
  2119 
  2119 
  2119 
  2119 
  2220 
EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION
EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION
EX-32: CERTIFICATIONS
EX-3.1: BYLAWS OF EMERSON RADIO CORP., AS AMENDED
 EX-31.1: CERTIFICATION
 EX-31.2: CERTIFICATION
 EX-32: CERTIFICATIONSCERTIFICATION

2


PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
EMERSON RADIO CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except earnings per share data)
                        
 Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended Three Months Ended
 December 31 December 31 June 30
 2007 2006 2007 2006 2008 2007
      
Net revenues
  
Net revenues $75,543 $89,339 $185,969 $244,168  $43,095 $52,603 
Net revenues-related party 246  370   13 85 
      
 75,789 89,339 186,339 244,168  43,108 52,688 
      
 
Costs and expenses:
  
Cost of sales 68,191 64,344 164,832 177,920  38,021 45,248 
Cost of sales-related party 232  232  
Cost of sales-related party purchases  12,148  33,090 
Other operating costs and expenses 1,434 1,330 4,778 4,355  1,131 1,796 
Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of non-cash compensation shown below) 7,623 5,402 17,907 16,208  4,828 4,977 
Acquisition costs incurred    21 
Non-cash compensation, net of recoveries 28 83  (159) 138  18 79 
      
 77,508 83,307 187,590 231,732  43,998 52,100 
      
Operating income (loss)
  (1,719) 6,032  (1,251) 12,436 
Gain on sale of building   854  
Gains on foreign exchange forward contracts 515  515  
Interest (expense), net  (76)  (457)  (72)  (564)
 
Operating (loss) income
  (890) 588 
Interest income, net 132 70 
Interest income-related party   163    163 
Realized/unrealized holding gains on trading securities 262  
      
Income (loss) before income taxes
  (1,280) 5,575 209 11,872 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (2,394) 1,880 1,937 3,792 
(Loss) income before income taxes and minority interest
  (496) 821 
Provision for income taxes 527 379 
Minority interest in loss of consolidated subsidiary 94  
      
Net income (loss)
 $1,114 $3,695 $(1,728) $8,080 
Net (loss) income
 $(929) $442 
      
Net income (loss) per share:
 
 
Net (loss) income per share:
 
Basic $.04 $0.14 $(.06) $0.30  $(0.03) $0.02 
Diluted $.04 $0.14 $(.06) $0.30  $(0.03) $0.02 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
  
Basic 27,130 27,097 27,125 27,080  27,130 27,115 
Diluted 27,136 27,117 27,125 27,121  27,130 27,141 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the interim
consolidated financial statements.

3


EMERSON RADIO CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except share data)
                
 December 31, 2007 March 31, 2007(A)  June 30, 2008 March 31, 2008(A) 
 (Unaudited)  (Unaudited) 
ASSETS
  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents $20,395 $1,851  $16,569 $14,444 
Restricted cash  3,000  2,000  
Foreign exchange forward contracts 279    134 
Accounts receivable (less allowances of $5,722 and $3,573, respectively) 26,470 19,375 
Accounts receivable (less allowances of $3,327 and $4,148, respectively) 21,562 17,289 
Other receivables 1,673 1,536  1,525 2,131 
Due from affiliates 797 24,690  179 765 
Net inventory 33,110 32,463 
Inventory, net 26,593 24,854 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 2,956 3,376  2,462 2,246 
Deferred tax assets 5,071 5,737  4,811 5,412 
          
Total current assets
 90,751 92,028  75,701 67,275 
Property, plant and equipment, net 1,474 2,492  1,863 1,902 
Trademarks and other intangible assets, net 285 311  273 279 
Investments in marketable securities 10,510 11,948 
Deferred tax assets 5,787 4,067  6,029 5,927 
Other assets 629 510  612 598 
          
Total assets
 $98,926 $99,408  $94,988 $87,929 
          
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
  
Current liabilities:  
Short-term borrowings $ $3,111 
Current maturities of long-term borrowings 73 146  $83 $82 
Accounts payable and other current liabilities 25,321 20,044  30,086 21,737 
Due to affiliates 11 102 
Accrued sales returns 924 1,191  706 872 
Income taxes payable 492 306  167 185 
Deferred tax liabilities  47 
          
Total current liabilities
 26,810 24,845  31,053 22,978 
Long-term borrowings 136 651  123 142 
Deferred tax liabilities 50 25  65 57 
Minority interest 39 133 
Shareholders’ equity:  
Preferred shares — 10,000,000 shares authorized; 3,677 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference of $3,677 3,310 3,310 
Common shares — $.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized; 52,965,797 shares issued at December 31, 2007; 52,945,797 shares issued at March 31, 2007; 27,129,832 shares outstanding at December 31, 2007 and 27,109,832 shares outstanding at March 31, 2007, respectively 529 529 
Preferred shares —10,000,000 shares authorized; 3,677 shares issued and outstanding; liquidation preference of $3,677 3,310 3,310 
Common shares — $.01 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized; 52,965,797 shares issued at June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008; 27,129,832 shares outstanding at June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2008 529 529 
Capital in excess of par value 117,263 117,371  117,263 117,245 
Accumulated other comprehensive losses  (82)  (82)  (82)  (82)
Accumulated deficit  (24,866)  (23,017)  (33,088)  (32,159)
Treasury stock, at cost, 25,835,965 shares  (24,224)  (24,224)  (24,224)  (24,224)
          
Total shareholders’ equity
 71,930 73,887  63,708 64,619 
          
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 $98,926 $99,408  $94,988 $87,929 
          
 
(A) Reference is made to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20072008 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in June 2007July 2008 and amended in July 2007.2008.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the interim consolidated financial statements.

4


EMERSON RADIO CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
                
 Nine Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
 December 31  June 30 
 2007 2006  2008 2007 
Cash flows from operating activities:  
Net income (loss) $(1,728) $8,080 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided (used) by operating activities: 
Net (loss) income $(929) $442 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: 
Minority interest  (94)  
Depreciation and amortization 620 701  227 202 
Non cash compensation  (159) 138  18 79 
Deferred tax expenses  (1,076) 2,445 
Deferred tax expense (benefit) 507 152 
Asset allowances, reserves and other 2,510 2,253   (1,843)  (2,088)
Gain on sale of building  (854)  
Write down of asset — molds 120  
Gains on foreign exchange forward contracts not settled  (279)  
Unrealized holding gains on trading securities  (262)  
Changes in assets and liabilities:  
Restricted cash 3,000    (2,000)  
Foreign exchange foreign contracts 134  
Accounts receivable  (11,986)  (4,325)  (3,318)  (7,961)
Other receivables  (137)  (263) 606  (99)
Due from affiliates 23,893  (22,605) 586 24,451 
Inventories 1,467  (7,861)  (1,017)  (11,285)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 420  (1,219)  (216)  (248)
Other assets  (181) 525   (35) 87 
Accounts payable and other current liabilities 5,277 3,929  8,349 20,100 
Due to affiliates  (91)  
Income taxes payable 65 1,309   (18) 91 
          
Net cash provided(used) by operating activities 20,972  (16,893)
Net cash provided by operating activities 604 23,923 
          
Cash flows from investing activities:  
Proceeds from sale of building 2,000  
Proceeds from partial calls on securities 1,700  
Additions to property and equipment  (741)  (225)  (161)  (126)
          
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities 1,259  (225) 1,539  (126)
          
Cash flows from financing activities:  
Short-term borrowings  (73) 31,894  1 4 
Repayments of short-term borrowings   (24,045)
Net borrowings under foreign bank facilities  (3,111) 2,886 
Net borrowings (repayments) under foreign bank facilities   (2,495)
Exercise of stock options 51 94   51 
Long-term borrowings 143,671 63,321  27,190 51,158 
Repayments of long-term borrowings  (144,225)  (63,487)  (27,209)  (51,201)
          
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities  (3,687) 10,663 
Net cash (used) by financing activities  (18)  (2,483)
          
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 18,544  (6,455)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 2,125 21,314 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 1,851 17,517  14,444 1,851 
          
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $20,395 $11,062  $16,569 $23,165 
          
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing and financing activities:
The Company has entered into certain capital lease agreements. For the ninethree month periods ended December 31,June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, the Company entered into agreements related to approximately $39$0 and $264$39 of equipment, respectively, which are excluded from the statement of cash flows as the transactions were non-cash in nature.
Cash paid during the period for:
                
Interest $410 $906  $29 $121 
Income taxes $5,200 $1,069  $20 $115 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the interim consolidated financial statements.

5


EMERSON RADIO CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1 BACKGROUND AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
     The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Emerson Radio Corp. (“Emerson”, consolidated the “Company”), which operates in the consumer electronics business. The consumer electronics business includes the design, sourcing, importing and marketing of a variety of consumer electronic products and the licensing of the “(EMERSON LOGO)” and H.H. Scott(R) trademarks for a variety of products domestically and internationally to certain licensees.
     The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary to present a fair statement of our consolidated financial position as of December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 and the results of operations for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2006.June 30, 2007. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The preparation of the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes; actual results could materially differ from those estimates. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and accordingly do not include all of the disclosures normally made in our annual consolidated financial statements. Accordingly, these unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20072008 (“fiscal 2007”2008”), included in our annual report on Form 10-K, as amended, for fiscal 2007.2008.
     Due to the seasonal nature of Emerson’s business, the results of operations for the three and nine month periodsperiod ended December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for any other interim period or for the full year ending March 31, 20082009 (“fiscal 2008”2009”).
     Certain reclassifications were made to conform the prior year’s financial statements to the current presentation.
Stock—Stock- Based Compensation
The Company accounts for all share based payments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“FAS”) No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” (“FAS 123R”). As a result, the Company has applied FAS 123R to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled. Compensation cost for the portion of awards for which the requisite service had not been rendered are being recognized as the requisite service is rendered (generally over the remaining option vesting period). The compensation cost for that portion of awards has been based on the grant-date fair value of those awards as calculated for pro forma disclosures under previously issued accounting standards. As a result of applying the provisions of FAS 123R, the Company has recorded compensation costs of $28,000$18,000 and $83,000$79,000 for the three months ended December 31,June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively. For the nine month period ended December 31, 2007, the Company recorded a recovery of compensation costs of $159,000, and for the nine month period ended December 31, 2006, the Company recorded compensation costs of $138,000.
NOTE 2 COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
     Comprehensive income for the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2006June 30,2007 is as follows (in thousands):
                 
  Three months ended Nine months ended
  December 31 December 31
 ��2007 2006 2007 2006
  (Unaudited)        
Net income (loss) $1,114  $3,695  $(1,728) $8,080 
Recognition of realized losses in net income           (2)
Change in unrealized loss on securities, net     (5)     (10)
     
Comprehensive income $1,114  $3,690  $(1,728) $8,068 
     
         
  Three months ended
  June 30
  2008 2007
     
Net (loss) income $(929) $442 
Unrealized holding gains arising during period  (31)   
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net income  31    
     
Comprehensive (loss) income $(929) $442 
     

6


NOTE 3 NET EARNINGS PER SHARE
     The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (in thousands, except per share amounts):
                        
 Three months ended Nine months ended Three months ended
 December 31 December 31 June 30
 2007 2006 2007 2006 2008 2007
 (Unaudited) (Unaudited)     
Numerator:
  
Net income (loss) for basic and diluted earnings per share $1,114 $3,695 $(1,728) $8,080 
Net (loss) income for basic and diluted earnings per share $(929) $442 
        
Denominator:
  
 
Denominator for basic earnings per share — weighted average shares 27,130 27,097 27,125 27,080 
Denominator for basic earnings per share – weighted average shares 27,130 27,115 
Effect of dilutive securities on denominator:  
Options and warrants 6 20  41   26 
        
Denominator for diluted earnings per share — weighted average shares and assumed conversions 27,136 27,117 27,125 27,121 
Denominator for diluted earnings per share – weighted average shares and assumed conversions 27,130 27,141 
        
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share $0.04 $0.14 $(0.06) $0.30 
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per share $(0.03) $0.02 
        
NOTE 4—4- SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
     Outstanding capital stock at December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 consisted of common stock and Series A convertible preferred stock. The Series A convertible preferred stock is non-voting, has no dividend preferences and has not been convertible since March 31, 2002; however, it retains a liquidation preference.
     At December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, Emerson had approximately 312,000212,000 options outstanding with exercise prices ranging from $1.00 to $3.23.
     In September 2003, the Company publicly announced the Emerson Radio Corp. common stock repurchase program. The program provides for share repurchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of Emerson’s outstanding common stock. No shares were repurchased in the three months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007. As of December 31, 2007, the Company has repurchased 1,267,623June 30, 2008, 732,377 shares under this program. No shares have been repurchasedremain available for repurchase under the program since June 14, 2005.established in September 2003. Repurchases of the Company’s shares are subject to certain conditions under Emerson’s banking facility.
     On October 7, 2003, in connection with a consulting arrangement, the Company granted 50,000 warrants with an exercise price of $5.00 per share. These warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option valuation model, which resulted in $90,500 being charged to earnings during fiscal 2004. As of December 31, 2007, these warrants had not been exercised.
     On August 1, 2004, in connection with a consulting agreement, the Company granted 50,000 warrants with immediate vesting and an exercise price of $3.00 per share with an expiration date of August 2009. These warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes valuation model, which resulted in $88,500 being charged to earnings during fiscal 2005. As of December 31, 2007, these warrants had not been exercised.
NOTE 5 INVENTORY
     Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the first-in, first-out method. As of December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2007,2008, inventories consisted of the following (in thousands):
                
 December 31, 2007 March 31, 2007 June 30, 2008 March 31, 2008
 (Unaudited)  (Unaudited) 
Finished goods $35,372 $36,839  $29,747 $28,730 
Less inventory allowances  (2,262)  (4,376)  (3,154)  (3,876)
      
Net inventory $33,110 $32,463  $26,593 $24,854 
      
NOTE 6 INCOME TAXES
     The Company has tax net operating loss carry forwards included in net deferred tax assets that are available to offset future taxable income and can be carried forward for 15 to 20 years. Although realization is not assured, management believes it is more likely than not that all of the net deferred tax assets will be realized through tax planning strategies available in future periods and through future profitable operating results. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be reduced or eliminated if certain tax planning strategies are not successfully executed or estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced. If management determines that the Company would not be able to realize all or part of the net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

7


     During the current quarter, the Company resolved all of the outstanding disputes which its predecessor had relating to franchise taxes, interest and penalties due and owing to the State of California for the tax years through and including the date that such predecessor ceased doing business. As a consequence of the settlement, Emerson reversed and recognized in the current quarter, a reduction of its tax provision of $1,041,826 which was previously accrued for such liability.
     In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation (“FIN”) No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”. FIN 48 establishes a single model to address accounting for uncertain tax positions. FIN 48 clarifies the accounting for income taxes by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold which a tax position is required to attain before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, measurement classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. Upon adoption of FIN 48, as of April 1, 2007, we recorded a net increase to accumulated deficit of $121,000, including approximately $68,000 related to accrued interest and penalties related to state income tax matters.
     As of April 1, 2007, the Company had $121,000$149,000 of unrecognized tax benefits related to state taxes. All of the unrecognized tax benefits could impact our effective tax rate if recognized.
     Estimated interest and penalties related to the underpayment of income taxes are classified as a component of income tax expense in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and totaled $16,000.Operations. Accrued interest and penalties were $80,000$49,000 as of December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 and are recognized in the balance sheet.

7


     TheOur effective tax rate for the respective three and nine months ended December 31, 2007 differs from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of the settlement made in relationdue to the California franchiseexpenses that are not deductible for federal income tax issue described in the second paragraph of this note. The effective tax rate for the respective threepurposes and nine months ended December 31, 2006 differs from the federal statutory rate primarily as a result of state income taxes.
     The Company is subject to examination and assessment by tax authorities in numerous jurisdictions. A summary of the Company’s open tax years is as follows as of December 31, 2007:June 30, 2008:
   
Jurisdiction Open tax years
U.S. federal 2003-20062004-2007
States with ongoing examinations 2003-2006
States without ongoing examinations2003-20062004-2007
     Based on the outcome of tax examinations or due to the expiration of statutes of limitations, it is reasonably possible that the unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions taken in previously filed returns may be different from the liabilities that have been recorded for these unrecognized tax benefits. As a result, the Company may be subject to additional tax expense.
     In May 2007, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) FIN 48-1 Definition of a Settlement in FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FSP(“FSP FIN 48-1)48-1”). FSP FIN 48-1 provides guidance on how to determine whether a tax position is effectively settled for the purpose of recognizing previously unrecognized tax benefits. FSP FIN 48-1 is effective retroactively to April 1, 2007. The implementation of this standard did not have a material impact on our consolidated balance sheets or statements of operations.
NOTE 7 RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
     From time to time, Emerson engages in business transactions with its controlling shareholder, The Grande Holdings Limited and its subsidiaries (“Grande”).  Set forth below is a summary of such transactions.  As of June 30, 2008, substantially all monies then currently due to Emerson from Grande have been paid in full.
Grande’s Purchase of Controlling Interest in Emerson.On December 5, 2005, The Grande Holdings Limited (“Grande”) purchased approximately 37% (10,000,000 shares) of the Company’s outstanding common stock (10,000,000 shares) from our former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Geoffrey P. Jurick. Since its initial purchase, Grande has increased its ownership of the Company’s common stock through open market and private purchases, including the purchase on September 21, 2007 from a former holder of more than five percent of Emerson’s common stock of 1,853,882 shares.  Grande beneficially owned approximately 57.6% of the Company’s common stock on December 31, 2007.June 30, 2008.
     License Agreement for Scott Brands.In October 2006,April 2008, Emerson entered into anterminated its agreement with a consumer electronics distributor, , APH (the “Licensee”), pursuant to which, among other things, Emerson had agreed to grant the Licensee a license to distribute and sell LCD televisions (“LCD sets”) in North America under Emerson’s “H.H. Scott” brand name. The licensee hasalso had a distributor relationship with Grande, a related party to Emerson. In the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2006, the Licensee began selling 32” and 37” LCD sets to a major United States based retailer. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement with the licensee, Emerson was paid a royaltyroyalties of $110,000 in March 2007 as a result of such sales through March 31, 2007. No sales of LCD televisions pursuantbearing the H.H. Scott name.
Unsecured Financial Assistance to this agreement occurred and no royalty was paid to Emerson under this agreement during the nine month period ended December 31, 2007.
Grande.During the third quarter of fiscal 2007, Emerson provided unsecured financial assistance to Capetronic Display Limited

8


(“Capetronic”), Nakamichi Corporation (“Nakamichi”), Akai Electric (China) Co. Ltd. (“Akai”), and Sansui Electric (China) Co. (“Sansui”), each of which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Grande, the manufacturer of the LCD sets, in the form of letters of credit and loans which aggregated approximately $22.0 million at December 31, 2006. In reviewing the documentation for certain of the letters of credit referred to above, Emerson determined that some of the parts for which letters of credit were opened were to be used for the manufacture of 27” and 42” television sets to be sold to the Licensee by Akai. Emerson had no direct or indirect interest in such sales, and Capetronic paid Emerson $57,000 as a fee for facilitating these transactions.
     As a result of the transactions described in the preceding paragraph, Emerson may have been deemed to be in breach of certain covenants contained in Emerson’s credit facility. The lender under the credit facility agreed to waive such breaches and Emerson and the lender negotiated an amendment to the credit facility. Emerson was required to pay $125,000 to the lender in connection with the amendment. Emerson charged this amount to Capetronic and $125,000 was paid to one of Emerson’s foreign subsidiaries on August 14, 2007 by Capetronic.
     On February 21, 2007, Capetronic, Nakamichi, Akai, and Sansui (collectively, the “Borrowers”), each of which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Grande, jointly and severally, issued a promissory note (the “Note”) in favor of the Company in the principal amount of $23,501,514. The principal amount of the Note represented the outstanding amount owed to the Company as of February 21, 2007, as a result of certain related party transactions entered into between the Company and the Borrowers described above, including interest that had accrued from the date of such related party transactions until the date of the Note. Simultaneously with the execution of the Note, Grande executed a guaranty (the “Guaranty”) in favor of the Company pursuant to which Grande guaranteed payment of all of the obligations of the Borrowers under the Note in accordance with the terms thereof.

8


     Interest on the unpaid principal balance of the Note accrued at a rate of 8.25% per annum, commencing on February 21, 2007, until all obligations under the Note were paid in full, subject to an automatic increase of 2% per annum in the event of default under the Note in accordance with the terms thereof. Payments of principal and interest under the Note were to be made in nine installments from April 1, 2007 through June 3, 2007 in such amounts and on such dates as set forth in the Note, with all amounts of interest due under the Note scheduled to be paid with the final installment.
     By June 3, 2007, all amounts due under the note were repaid. In February 2008, Emerson accepted a debit note from Capetronic for $4,604 resulting from a previous overpayment of the note.
     Product Sourcing Transactions.Since August 2006, Emerson has been providing to Sansui Sales PTE Ltd (“Sansui Sales”) and Akai Sales PTE Ltd (“Akai Sales”), both of which are subsidiaries of Grande, assistance with acquiring certain products for resale.sale. Emerson issues purchase orders to third-party suppliers who manufacture these products, and Emerson issues sales invoices to Sansui Sales’ and Akai Sales’ at gross amounts for these products. Financing is provided by Sansui Sales’ and Akai Sales’ customers in the form of transfer letters of credit to the suppliers, and goods are shipped directly from the suppliers to Sansui Sales’ and Akai Sales’ customers. Emerson recorded income totaling $100,000$13,000 and $85,000 for providing this service in the ninethree months ended DecemberJune 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively. On June 30, 2008 Akai Sales and Sansui Sales collectively paid Emerson the outstanding receivable of $134,000 as of March 31, 2007.2008 as well as $8,000 on current activity. Sansui Sales and Akai Sales collectively owe Emerson $126,000$5,000 at December 31, 2007 as a resultJune 30, 2008 related to current activity.
Sales of these transactions.
goods.In addition to the product sourcing transactions described in the preceding paragraph, Emerson has also purchased products on behalf of Sansui Sales and Akai Sales from third-party suppliers and sold these goods to Sansui Sales and Akai Sales. These transactions are similar to the transactions described in the preceding paragraph; however, instead of utilizing transfer letters of credit provided by Sansui Sales’ and Akai Sales’ customers, Emerson utilizes its own cash to pay Sansui Sales’ and Akai Sales’ suppliers (See Item 4.B “Changes in Internnal Control Over Financial Reporting”).suppliers. Emerson invoices Sansui Sales and Akai Sales an amount that is marked up between two and three percent from the cost of the product. In comparisonAkai Sales deducted $9,000 for storage charges from its June 30, 2008 settlement payment to similar direct import salesEmerson, which Emerson makes to third-party customers, the mark-up on these related party sales, despite the fact that Emerson does not incur a trademark royalty on these sales, cannot be consideredwas deemed to be in error by Emerson, which resulted in an outstanding balance owed to Emerson of $9,000 at arms length. Emerson recorded sales to Akai and Sansui of $241,000 in the nine months ended December 31, 2007. Sansui Sales and Akai Sales collectively owe Emerson $44,000 at December 31, 2007 on these sales. In addition,June 30, 2008. Emerson has outstanding liabilities with suppliers of product invoiced to Sansui Sales and Akai Sales totaling $41,000$3,000 at December 31, 2007.June 30, 2008.
     Leases and Other Real Estate Transactions.Effective January 1, 2006, we entered into a lease for office space in Hong Kong with Grande and an agreement for services in connection with this office space rental from Grande, which was extended through December 31, 2008, and which will expire at that date unless terminated earlier by either party upon three months prior written notice of termination by either party. We incurred rent expense with Grande of approximately $105,000 and $45,000 forUnder a new agreement commencing March 1, 2008, the three month periods ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.office space rented was increased from 7,810 square feet to 18,476 square feet. Rent expense with Grande was $185,000$119,000 and $158,000$35,000 for the nine month periodsthree months ended December 31,June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, and December 31, 2006, respectively. The amount of expense incurred with Grande for all other services in connection with this office space rental was approximately $58,000$20,000 and $61,000$7,000 for the fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2008, respectively. Emerson owed Grande $11,000 related to this activity at June 30, 2008.
     Emerson utilizes the services of Grande employees for certain administrative and executive functions. Grande pays Emerson’s quality assurance personnel in RMB in China on Emerson’s behalf for which Emerson subsequently pays a reimbursement to Grande. Payroll and travel expenses, including utilization of Grande employees as well as payroll and travel expenses paid on Emerson’s behalf and reimbursed to Grande, were $91,000 for each of the three month periodsmonths ended December 31,June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively. Emerson has a balance paid in advance to Grande of $7,000 related to this activity as of June 30, 2008.
     From May to October 2007, Emerson occupied office space in Shenzhen, China under a lease agreement with Akai AV Multimedia (Zhongshan) Co Ltd, an affiliate of Grande. Rent expense was $28,000 and December 31, 2006, respectively. The amount of expense incurred with Grande for all other servicesexpenses in connection with this office space rentalagreement were $15,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2007. The agreement was approximately $172,000 and $182,000 for the nine month periods ended December 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.not renewed.
     In May 2007 Emerson paid an initiala $10,000 commission to Vigers Hong Kong Ltd, (“Vigers”), a property agent and a subsidiary

9


of Grande, related to the sale of a building owned by Emerson to an unaffiliated buyer. Also, Emerson received a deposit of approximately $300,000 from the buyer on this date. The sale was concluded on September 27, 2007. An additional $10,000 commission was paid to Vigers by Emerson on the closing date of the sale of the property. Emerson received the balance of the purchase price of approximately $1,700,000 on September 27, 2007, the closing date of the sale.
     In June 2007 Emerson paid a one-time sales commission in the amount of $14,000 to an Executive Director of Grande Holdings, who is also Emerson’s President-International Sales and also a Director of Emerson. The commission was 50% of the net margin on a sale by Emerson to an unaffiliated customer.
Toy Musical Instruments.In May 2007, Emerson entered into an agreement with Goldmen Electronic Co. Ltd. (“Goldmen”), pursuant to which we agreed to pay $1,682,220 in exchange for Goldmen’s manufacture and delivery to us of musical instruments in order for us to meet our delivery requirements of these instruments in the first week of September 2007. In July 2007, we learned that Goldmen had filed for bankruptcy and was unable to manufacture the musical instruments we had ordered. Promptly after we learned of Goldmen’s bankruptcy, Capetronic agreed to manufacture the musical instruments on substantially the same terms and conditions, including the price, as Goldmen had agreed to manufacture them. Accordingly, on July 12, 2007, we paid Tomei Shoji Limited, an affiliate of Grande, $125,000 to acquire from Goldmen and deliver to Capetronic the molds and equipment necessary for Capetronic to manufacture the musical instruments. In July, 2007, Emerson made two upfront payments to Capetronic totaling $546,000 (not the $1,682,220 previously mistakenly being reported as having been advanced).$546,000. On July

9


20, 2007, Capetronic advised us that it was unable to manufacture the musical instruments for us because it did not have the requisite governmental licenses to do so. As of December 31, 2007,In June 2008, Capetronic repaid the $546,000 advance it received from Emerson in July 2007. Capetronic currently physically possesses theour musical instrument molds, owned by Emerson and owes to Emerson $546,000 for the upfront advances madewhich we wrote off in anticipation of Capetronic’s manufacture of the instruments. As a result of the above, Emerson has written the cost of the molds down to $0 at December 31, 2007.fiscal 2008.
Freight Forwarding Services.In June 2007, Emerson and Capetronic signed an agreement for Emerson to provide freight forwarding services to Capetronic, whereuponCapetronic. Under this agreement, Emerson will pay the costs of importation of Capetronic’s inventory on Capetronic’s behalf. Under the agreement, Emerson is alsobehalf, and to arrange for the inventory to be received at a port of entry, cleared through the United States Customs Service using Emerson’s regularly engaged broker, and transfer the inventory to a common carrier as arranged by Capetronic’s customer. If Capetronic’s customer has not madefailed to make such arrangements with a common carrier, Emerson isagreed to transfer the inventory to Emerson’s warehouse for storage or make other arrangements with a public warehouse. Following the transfer of Capetronic’s inventory, Emerson is required to provide Next Day delivery of all importation documents and bills of lading to Capetronic’s customer. Capetronic agreesagreed to reimburse Emerson for all costs incurred by Emerson in connection with the activity just described within thirty days of demand by Emerson, after which interest will accrue.accrues. As compensation, Capetronic agreesagreed to pay Emerson a service fee of 12% of the importation costs. Emerson billed Capetronic for the reimbursement of importation costs totaling $246,000 and a commission of $29,000. Capetronic paid Emerson $275,000 on November 14, 2007.
Other.Between August and December 2007, Emerson paid invoices and incurred charges for goods and services relating to the Hong Kong Electronics Fair of $153,069.00.$153,069. Portions of these charges totaling $87,353.18,$87,353, have been allocated and invoiced to affiliates of Grande in proportion to their respective share of space occupied and services rendered during the Electronics Fair as follows;follows: Nakamichi Corporation Ltd. $17,143.08,$17,143, Akai Sales PtePTE Ltd $44,495.48$44,495 and Sansui Sales PtePTE Ltd $25,714.62. All$25,715. Akai Sales and Sansui Sales collectively owed Emerson $70,210 in connection with the Hong Kong Electronics Fair as of March 31, 2008, for which they collectively paid $63,774 to Emerson on June 30, 2008. Akai Sales owes Emerson $6,436 for this activity as of June 30, 2008.
     Also related to the annual Hong Kong Electronics Fairs, Capetronic incurred charges and paid invoices on behalf of Emerson in the amount of $76,000 for which Emerson reimbursed Capetronic $48,000 in March 2008. Emerson paid Capetronic the remaining balance of $28,000 for these trade shows on June 30, 2008.
     In June 2007 Emerson paid a one-time sales commission in the amount of $14,000 to an Executive Director of Grande Holdings, who is also a Director of Emerson. The commission was 50% of the respective amounts have been classified as Duenet margin on a sale by Emerson to an unaffiliated customer.
     In January 2008, Grande transferred computer, office equipment, and furniture to Emerson for which Emerson paid $12,000, which represented the carrying amount of the assets on the books of Grande at the time of sale.
     In June 2008, Emerson paid Capetronic $160,000 for reimbursement of payroll and travel expenses paid on behalf of Emerson from Affiliates.October 2007 through May 2008. Also included in the payment was a reimbursement for expenses Capetronic paid on behalf of Emerson for a trade show.
NOTE 8 BORROWINGS
Short-term Borrowings
     During the third quarter of fiscalAt June 30, 2008 Emerson elected to cancel it’s foreign bank facilities. As a result, the $3.0 million in certificates of deposit at these banks to assure the availability of the credit facilities was returned.
     Atand March 31, 2007,2008 there were no short-term borrowings consisted of amounts outstanding under foreign bank facilities held by the Company’s foreign subsidiaries. Availability under the foreign bank facilities totaled $17.5 million prior to their cancellation in December 2007.
         
  December 31, 2007  March 31, 2007 
  (In thousands) 
  (Unaudited)     
Foreign bank loans $0  $3,111 
       
Short term borrowings $0  $3,111 
       
outstanding.
Long-term Borrowings
     As of December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 and March 31, 2007,2008, borrowings under long-term facilities consisted of the following:

10


                
 December 31, 2007 March 31, 2007  June 30, 2008 March 31, 2008 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
 (Unaudited)  (Unaudited)   
Mortgage payable $ $567 
Capitalized lease obligations and other 209 230  206 224 
     
 209 797 
Less current maturities  (73)  (146)  (83)  (82)
          
Long term debt and notes payable $136 $651  $123 $142 
          
     Credit Facility On December 23, 2005, Emerson entered into a $45.0 million Revolving Credit Agreement with Wachovia Bank. The loan agreement provides for a $45.0 million revolving line of credit for revolving loans subject to individual maximums which, in the aggregate, are not to exceed the lesser of $45.0 million or a “Borrowing Base” as defined in the loan agreement. The Borrowing Base amount is established by specified percentages of eligible accounts receivables and inventories and bears interest ranging from Prime (7.25%(5.00% as of December 31, 2007)June 30, 2008) plus 0.00% to 0.50% or, at Emerson’s election, the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR” which was 5.02%2.47% as of December 31, 2007)June 30, 2008) plus 1.25% to 2.25% depending on excess availability. Pursuant to the Revolving Credit

10


Agreement, Emerson is restricted from, among other things, paying certain cash dividends, and entering into certain transactions without the lender’s prior consent and is subject to certain leverage financial covenants. Amounts outstanding under the loan agreement are secured by substantially all of Emerson’s tangible assets.
     During the quarter ended September 30, 2006, Emerson amended its Revolving Credit Agreement with Wachovia Bank, National Association to finance its working capital requirements through October 31, 2006, primarily to ensure funding of the promotional item purchases totaling over $30.0 million. Under this amendment, Emerson’s line of credit was increased to $53 million from $45 million for this period, and its revolver commitments, letters of credit and inventory borrowing bases were increased. Emerson did not utilize the additional available funds during the amendment period, and this amendment expired at October 31, 2006.
     At December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, there were no borrowings outstanding under the facility.
     As of December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, the carrying value of this credit facility approximated fair value.
     As a result of the related party transactions entered into between Emerson and affiliates of Grande described in Note 7, Emerson may have been deemed to be in breach of certain covenants contained in Emerson’s credit facility, including a covenant restricting Emerson from lending money and from entering into related party transactions without the consent of its lender. The lender under the credit facility agreed to waive such breaches and Emerson and the lender negotiated an amendment to the credit facility. Under the amendment, (i) Emerson granted the lender a security interest in the $23 million Note and the Guaranty referred to in Note 7, (ii) a failure (following a 15 day cure period) by the borrowers to make payments to Emerson as required by the terms of the Note would be deemed a default under the credit facility, (iii) the number of field audits by the lender was increased from two to three each year and (iv) Emerson was required to pay $125,000 to the lender in connection with the amendment. All amounts due under the $23 million Note were repaid in full as of June 3, 2007. As of August 14, 2007 the amendment fee of $125,000 was repaid by Capetronic to Emerson.
NOTE 9 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
     There currently is pending against three directorsIn late July 2008, the Court of Chancery of the Company (Messrs. Ho, MaState of Delaware (the “Court”) entered an Order (the “Order”) consolidating for all purposes two previously disclosed derivative actions (the “Berkowitz” and Binney) a purported derivative action“Pinchuk” lawsuits) filed on the Company’sour behalf by twoagainst certain of its shareholders.our current and former directors.  The complaint, which has not yet been answered by the defendants, allegescomplaints in each of such actions alleged that the named defendants each of whom also is an executive officer of Grande Holdings, the Company’s controlling shareholder, violated their fiduciary duties to Emersonus in connection with a number of previously disclosed related party transactions with affiliates of Grande Holdings.Holdings, our controlling shareholder.  The Order also organizes counsel for the plaintiffs in the consolidated action, relieves the defendants of their obligation to answer the “Berkowitz” and “Pinchuk” complaints and contemplates the filing of a consolidated complaint as soon as practicable. The recovery, in such lawsuit, if any, in the consolidated action, will inure to Emerson’sour benefit.
     Except for the litigation matters described above, we are not currently a party to any legal proceedings other than litigation matters, in most cases involving ordinary and routine claims incidental to our business. We cannot estimate with certainty our ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to such pending litigation matters. However, we believe, based on our examination of such matters, that our ultimate liability will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
NOTE 10 — FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
     TheIn March 2007, the Company entered into fixed period foreign exchange forward contracts (between the U.S.US and Hong Kong dollar), based on economic and market conditions and solely for the purpose of speculative trading, (See “Other Events and Circumstances Pertaining to Liquidity” and Item 4.b “Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” ).not for the purpose of hedging other business opportunities. The contract terms are for fixed periods and at DecemberMarch 31, 2007,2008, the Company’s foreign exchange forward contracts had expiration dates that ranged from one to sixtwo months, with notional amounts of $11$10 million.
     At each balance sheet date the Company accounts for its foreign exchange forward contracts as a current asset with corresponding realized or unrealized gains and losses included in the income statement. Realized gains of $281,308$132,647 have been recorded as non-operating income in the three months ended June 30, 2008. Realized gains of $13,835 were recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2007.
     At June 30, 2008, all foreign exchange forward contracts have expired and unrealized gainsthe Company has not entered into any new contracts.
NOTE 11 – MARKETABLE SECURITIES:
     As of June 30, 2008, the Company has $12.2 million invested in trading securities, consisting entirely of auction rate securities (“ARS”). These securities have long-term nominal maturities for which interest rates are reset through a Dutch auction process at pre-determined calendar intervals; a process which had historically provided a liquid market for these securities. Interest continues to be paid by the issuers of these securities even through the continued liquidity issues experienced in the global credit and capital markets despite these ARS having multiple failed auctions. Based on an independent valuation and its internal analysis, the Company concluded that these securities had experienced an other-than-temporary decline in fair value and recorded an impairment charge of $1.95 million in fiscal 2008. These ARS have AAA/Aaa credit ratings as of June 30, 2008, and have been classified as long-term investments in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as a consequence of their uncertain liquidity.
     The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Accounting for Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), on April 1, 2008. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). The standard outlines a valuation framework and creates a fair value hierarchy in order to increase the consistency and comparability of fair value measurements and the related disclosures.

11


$233,547 have been recorded     Financial assets and liabilities are measured using inputs from the three levels of the fair value hierarchy. The three levels are as non-operating incomefollows:
Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at December 31, 2007. There were no foreign exchange forward contractsthe measurement date.
Level 2 inputs are other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (i.e., interest rates, yield curves, etc.), and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means (market corroborated inputs).
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that reflect our own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The Company would develop these inputs based on the best information available, including its own data.
             In accordance with the fair value hierarchy described above, the following table shows the fair value of our securities available for sale that are required to be measured at December 31, 2006.fair value as of June 30, 2008:
Fair Value Measurement at Reporting Date Using:
     
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) June 30, 2008 
Investments in marketable securities (classified as trading securities) $10,510 
    
Investments in marketable securities $10,510 
    
     The following table summarizes the changes in fair value for our Level 3 assets:
     
  Fair Value 
  Measurement of 
  Asset using Level 3 
  inputs 
  Trading Securities 
  non-current 
Principal amount invested $13,900 
Total gains (losses) (realized or unrealized):    
Unrealized – included in earnings at March 31, 2008  (1,952)
Balance at March 31, 2008  11,948 
Total gains (losses) (realized or unrealized):    
Realized – included in earnings at June 30, 2008  231 
Unrealized – included in earnings at June 30, 2008  31 
Redemptions of principal  (1,700)
    
Balance at June 30, 2008 $10,510 
    
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition
     The following discussion of our operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

12


     In the following discussions, most percentages and dollar amounts have been rounded to aid presentation. Accordingly, all amounts are approximations.
Forward-Looking Information
     This report contains forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
     Forward-looking statements include statements with respect to Emerson’s beliefs, plans, objectives, goals, expectations, anticipations, assumptions, estimates, intentions, and future performance, and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may be beyond Emerson’s control, and which may cause Emerson’s actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements.
     All statements other than statements of historical fact are statements that could be forward-looking statements. You can identify these forward-looking statements through Emerson’s use of words such as “may,” “will,” “can,” “anticipate,” “assume,” “should,” “indicate,” “would,” “believe,” “contemplate,” “expect,” “seek,” “estimate,” “continue,” “plan,” “project,” “predict,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “potential,” and other similar words and expressions of the future. These forward-looking statements may not be realized due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation:
  the loss of any of our key customers or reduction in the purchase of our products by any such customers;
 
  Ourour inability to maintain effective internal controls or the failure by our personnel to comply with such internal controls;
 
  the failure to maintain our relationships with our licensees and distributors or the failure to obtain new licensees or distribution relationships on favorable terms;
 
  our inability to anticipate market trends, enhance existing products or achieve market acceptance of new products;
 
  our dependence on a limited number of suppliers for our components and raw materials;
 
  our dependence on third party manufacturersparties to manufacture and deliver our products;
 
  the seasonality of our business, as well as changes in consumer spending and economic conditions;
 
  the failure of third party sales representatives to adequately promote, market and sell our products;
 
  our inability to protect our intellectual property;
 
  the effects of competition;
 
  changes in foreign laws and regulations and changes in the political and economic conditions in the foreign countries in which we operate;
 
  conflicts of interest that exist based on our relationship with Grande;
 
  the outcome of the Audit Committee’s review of our related party transactions and internal controls;
 
  changes in accounting policies, rules and practices; and
 
  the other factors listed under “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 20072008 and

12


other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).
     All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary notice. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report or the date of the document incorporated by reference into this report. We have no obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update, revise or correct any of the forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. We have expressed our expectations, beliefs and projections in good faith and we believe they have a reasonable basis. However, we cannot assure you that our expectations, beliefs or projections will result or be achieved or accomplished.

13


Company Filings
     We make available through our internet website free of charge our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, amendments to such reports and other filings made by us with the SEC, as soon as practicable after we electronically file such reports and filings with the SEC. Our website address iswww.emersonradio.com. The information contained in this website is not incorporated by reference in this report.
     Results of Operations
     We operate in one segment, the consumer electronics segment, as presented in the following Management’s Discussion and Analysis.
     The following table summarizes certain financial information for the three and nine month periods ended December 31,June 30, 2008 (fiscal 2009) and June 30, 2007 (fiscal 2008) and the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2006 (fiscal 2007) (in thousands):
                 
  Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
  December 31 December 31
  2007 2006 2007 2006
  (Unaudited)        
Net revenues $75,543  $89,339  $185,969  $244,168 
Net revenues — related party  246      370    
   
   75,789   89,339   186,339   244,168 
   
Cost of sales  68,191   64,344   164,832   177,920 
Cost of sales — related party  232      232    
Cost of sales — related party purchases     12,148      33,090 
Other operating costs  1,434   1,330   4,778   4,355 
Selling, general and administrative costs  7,623   5,402   17,907   16,208 
Acquisition costs incurred           21 
Non-cash compensation costs (recovered)  28   83   (159)  138 
     
Operating income (loss)  (1,719)  6,032   (1,251)  12,436 
Gain on sale of building        854    
Gains on foreign exchange forward contracts  515      515    
Interest (expense), net  (76)  (457)  (72)  (564)
Interest income — related party        163    
   
Income (loss) before income taxes  (1,280)  5,575   209   11,872 
Provision (benefit) for income taxes  (2,394)  1,880   1,937   3,792 
     
Net income (loss) $1,114  $3,695  $(1,728) $8,080 
     
         
  Three Months Ended
  June 30
  2008 2007
     
Net revenues $43,108  $52,688 
         
Cost of sales  38,021   45,248 
Other operating costs and expenses  1,131   1,796 
Selling, general and administrative costs  4,828   4,977 
Non-cash compensation costs  18   79 
     
Operating income (loss)  (890)  588 
Interest income, net  132   233 
Unrealized holding gains on trading securities  262    
     
Income (loss) before income taxes  (496)  821 
Provision for income taxes  527   379 
Minority interest in loss of consolidated subsidiary  94    
     
Net income (loss) $(929) $442 
     
Net Revenues — Net revenues for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2009 were $43.1 million as compared to $52.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal 2008, were $75.8 million as compared to $89.3 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2007, a decrease of $13.5$9.6 million or 15.1%. For the nine month period of fiscal 2008, net revenues were $186.3 million as compared to $244.2 million for the nine month period of fiscal 2007, a decrease of $57.9 million or 23.7%18.2%. Net revenues are comprised of Emerson(R) branded product sales, themed product sales and licensing revenues. Emerson(R) branded product sales are earned from the sale of products bearing the Emerson(R) or HH Scott(R) brand name; themed product sales represent products sold bearing a certain theme or character; and licensing revenues are derived from licensing the Emerson(R) and HH Scott(R) brand names to licensees for a fee. The major elements which contributed to the overall decrease in net revenues was comprised of:were as follows:
 i) Home appliances product sales increased $4.0 million, or 15.4%, to $30.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 as compared to $26.0 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Home appliance product sales consist of microwave ovens, wine coolers, small refrigerators, and toaster ovens;
ii)Emerson(R) branded products sales, of $67.2excluding home appliances products, were $10.3 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2009 as compared to $22.7 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2008, as compared to $60.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, an increase of $6.9 million, or 11.4%. Emerson(R) branded products sales were $169.4 million in the nine month period of fiscal 2008 as compared to $176.3 million in the nine month period of fiscal 2007, a decrease of $7.0$12.4 million, or 4.0%. The increase for the three month period54.6%, primarily resulted from increased sales in our home appliance product category, specifically microwave ovens, refrigerators and wine coolers. The nine month decrease resulted primarilyresulting from decreased sales volumes in several audio product lines and the Ipod(R) compatible product category, partially offset by an increases in the home appliance and clock radio categories;

13


ii)During the third quarter and nine months ended December 31, 2006 Emerson had promotional item sales to ESI International of $12.3 million and $33.1 million, respectively, associated with a major holiday promotion with one of our major customers. In addition to increasing net revenues, this promotional sale resulted in an increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities and accounts receivable of $20.6 million and $20.8 million, respectively, in the period ended September 30, 2006 as well as an increase in short term deposits of $28.8 million in the same period due to parts and inventory purchases related to this sale. In order to fund these purchases, short term borrowings through our revolving line of credit increased by $24.0 million for the period ended September 30, 2006. These short term borrowings were repaid in the three months ended December 31, 2006;category;
 
 iii) Themed product sales were $600,000 in the first quarter of $6.8fiscal 2009 compared to $2.2 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2008, compared to $15.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, a decrease of $8.2$1.6 million, or 54.6%. For the nine month period of fiscal 2008, themed product sales were $11.6 million as compared to $30.0 million for the nine month period of fiscal 2007, a decrease of $18.4 million or 61.3%. The decrease for the three and nine month periods was72.7%, primarily a result ofresulting from the discontinuance of Nickelodeon(R) themed products partially offset byand a shift in the sales volume and product mix of Mattel(R) themed products which began in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, which were dampened in the current quarter by a $2.9 million sales return allowance the Company recorded for a product return made by one long time distribution partner. The Company is reserving for the complete return, as it works to place the returned inventory elsewhere within its customer base;products;
 
 iv) Licensing revenues decreasedincreased approximately $122,000,$54,000, or 7.0%3.2%, to $1.6$1.8 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20082009 as compared to $1.7 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2007. For the nine month period of fiscal 2008, primarily due to our video licensing revenues increased $259,000, or 5.4%, to $5.0 million as compared to $4.8 million in the nine months of fiscal 2007. The decrease in comparative quarters as compared to the increase in the comparative nine month periods are due primarily to the mix in the portfolio of licensees. Emerson’s current licensees as of December 31, 2007, particularly the newer licensees added during the nine month period have delivered more licensing revenue than the previous licensees whom they have in some cases replaced.arrangements;
 
 v) Sales of a joint venture which was formed in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008 for the primary purpose of manufacturing, selling, distributing, and/or licensing audio and video equipment for the home and/or office had sales of $421,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009; and
vi)In the three and nine month periods ended December 31,June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, Emersonwe charged fees of $8,000$13,000 and $100,000,$85,000, respectively, to Sansui Sales PTE, Ltd (“Sansui Sales”) and Akai Sales PTE, Ltd, (“Akai Sales”), both of which are related parties to Emerson,us, for assistance in procuring their product. In the nine month period of fiscal 2008, Emerson charged commissions of $29,000 to Capetronic Displays, Ltd, which is a related party to Emerson, for importation assistance. As of December 31, 2007, Capetronic has repaid this commission to Emerson. In the three and nine month periods ended December 31, 2007, Emerson sold to Sansui Sales and Akai Sales $238,000 and $241,000 of Sansui- and Akai-branded product which it sourced on their behalf from third-party suppliers. See Note 7 “Related Party Transactions”. No related party revenue was recorded in the third quarter and nine month period of fiscal 2007.
Cost of Sales — In absolute terms, cost of sales decreased $8.1$7.2 million, or 10.5%15.9%, to $68.4$38.0 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20082009 as

14


compared to $76.5$45.2 million in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2007. In absolute terms, cost of sales was $165.1 million in the nine month period of fiscal 2008 as compared to $211.0 million in the nine months of fiscal 2007.2008. Cost of sales, as a percentage of net revenues, was 90.3%88.2% and 85.6%85.9% in the thirdfirst quarters of fiscal 20082009 and fiscal 2007, respectively, and 88.6% and 86.4% in the nine month periods of fiscal 2008, and fiscal 2007, respectively. Cost of sales as a percentage of sales revenues less license revenues increased to 92.2%92.0% in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20082009 from 87.3%88.8% in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2007. Cost of sales as a percentage of sales revenues less license revenues increased to 91.0% in the nine month period of fiscal 2008 from 88.1% in the nine month period of fiscal 2007. As a percentage of net revenues for the third quarter and nine month period of fiscal 2008, cost of sales associated with sales to Akai Sales PTE, Ltd and Sansui Sales PTE, Ltd, related parties, were 0.3% and 0.1% of total Emerson net revenues. As a percentage of net revenues for the third quarter and nine month period of fiscal 2007, cost of sales associated with purchases from Capetronic Displays Ltd, a related party, was 13.6% of total Emerson net revenues.2008. The decrease in cost of sales in absolute terms for the thirdfirst quarter and nine month period of fiscal 20082009 as compared to the same periodsfirst quarter of fiscal 20072008 was primarily related to the decrease in sales volume, an increase in reserves for sales returns, a decrease in inventory reserves,warehousing costs, and a decrease in royalty expense offset by an increase in writedownscosts of personnel in Asia involved in quality assurance in production of our product, inventory warehousing costs,overhead, and inventory overhead.reserves. The increase in cost of sales as a percentage of net revenues for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20082009 as compared to fiscal 20072008 resulted from lower margins in several audiothemed product categories as well as an increase in warehousingquality assurance costs. The increase in cost of sales as a percentage of net revenues for the nine months of fiscal 2008 as compared to fiscal 2007 resulted from lower margins in several audio categories offset byIn addition, a decrease in inventory costs due to a decreasereserves in inventory reserves. The decrease in inventory reservesthe first quarter of fiscal 2008 resulted primarily from the reduction of inventory levels of a discontinued themed-product line and returned, substandard goods which are not sold to retailers, which werehad been fully reserved in our previous quarter; however, there was an offsetting impact on margins for the reduction in themed-product line goods as a consequence.preceding quarter.
Gross profit margins continue to be subject to competitive pressures arising from pricing strategies associated with the categories of the consumer electronics market in which we compete. Our products are generally placed in the low-to-medium priced category of the market, which ishas a tendency to be highly competitive.
Other Operating Costs and Expenses — As a percentage of net revenues, other operating costs and expenses were 1.9%2.6% in the third

14


first quarter of fiscal 20082009 and 1.5%3.4% in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2007. For the nine month periods of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007, other operating costs, as a percentage of net revenues, were 2.6% and 1.8%, respectively.2008. In absolute terms, other operating costs and expenses increased $105,000,decreased $665,000, or 7.9%37.0%, to $1.4$1.1 million for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2009 as compared to $1.8 million in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 as compared to $1.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007. Also in absolute terms, other operating costs and expenses increased $423,000, or 9.7%, to $4.8 million for the nine month period of fiscal 2008 as compared to $4.4 million for the nine month period of fiscal 2007. For the third quarter of fiscal 2008 as compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2007, the increase in absolute terms was thea result of increased service costs. For the nine month period of fiscal 2008 as compared to the nine month period of fiscal 2007, the increase in absolute terms was the result of increased handling charges offset by lowerdecreased service costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (“S,G&A”) — S,G&A, as a percentage of net revenues, were 9.7%11.2% in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20082009 as compared to 6.0%9.4% in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2007.2008. S,G&A, in absolute terms, increased $2.0 million,decreased $150,000, or 36.7%3.0%, to $7.4$4.8 million for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20082009 as compared to $5.4$5.0 million for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2007.2008. The increasedecrease in S,G&A in absolute terms between the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2009 and first quarter of fiscal 2008 and third quarter of fiscal 2007 was primarily due to an increasea decrease in professional fees of $899,000 largely as a result of legal fees associated with related party transaction investigations, variable selling expenses of $666,000, salaries$320,000 and bonusesadvertising expenses of $282,000, accounts receivable reserves$228,000 offset by an increase in rent expense of $239,000,$165,000, legal fees of $132,000, employment agency fees of $67,000, and consulting fees including fees related to the Company’s Sarbanes-Oxley section 404 implementation of $146,000. These increases were slightly offset by a decrease in advertising expense of $132,000 mostly connected to inward licensing requirements. As a percentage of net revenues, SG&A were 9.5% in the nine month period of fiscal 2008 as compared to 6.6% in the nine month period of fiscal 2007. In absolute terms, SG&A increased $1.4 million, or 8.9%, to $17.7 million for the nine month period of fiscal 2008 as compared to $16.2 million for the nine month period of fiscal 2007. The increase in S,G&A in absolute terms between the nine month periods of fiscal 2008 and fiscal 2007 was primarily due to an increase in professional fees of $1.2 million, salaries and bonuses of $1.2 million, and variable selling expenses of $287,000. These increases were offset by adjustments to accounts receivable reserves of $434,000, severance pay in the first quarter of the prior fiscal year of $300,000, a gain on the sale of marketable securities of $205,000, and a decrease in amortization expense of $92,000.
Gain on sale of building — Emerson sold its office location in Macao to an unaffiliated buyer for approximately $2.0 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2008. The gain on the sale of this property was $854,000, net of a $20,000 commission paid to a related party.
Gains on foreign exchange forward contracts — Realized gains of $281,000 and unrealized gains of $234,000 have been recorded as non-operating income at December 31, 2007. There were no foreign exchange forward contracts at December 31, 2006.$52,000.
Non Cash Compensation Non cash compensation relates to stock options expense associated with the adoption of FAS 123(R) “Share-Based Payment.” For the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2008,2009, non-cash compensation expensescosts of $28,000$18,000 were recorded, as compared to $83,000$79,000 in non-cash compensation costs recorded for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2007. As a result of stock option forfeitures due to senior management and board of director changes over the past year, adjustments representing recovery of these non-cash compensation costs incurred in prior years of $159,000 were recorded in the nine month period of fiscal 2008, as compared to expense of $138,000 in the nine month period of fiscal 2007.2008.
Interest Income, (Expense), net — Interest expense,income, net, decreased $381,000 or 83.4%, to $76,000 (0.1%was $132,000 (0.3% of net revenues) in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20082009 as compared to $457,000 (0.5%$233,000 (0.4% of net revenues) in the third quarter of fiscal 2007. For the nine month period of fiscal 2008,, including interest income on a note receivable from a related party was $163,000.of $163,000, in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. See Note 7 — “Related Party Transactions.” Exclusive of this related party interest income, interest expense, net, was $72,000 (less than 0.1% of net revenues) for the nine month period of fiscal 2008 as compared to interest expense, net, of $564,000 (0.2% of net revenues) for the nine month period of fiscal 2007. Interest income for the nine month periodfirst quarter of fiscal 20072009 was primarily comprised of interest earned on the related party interestauction rate securities. Interest income as well asfor the first quarter of 2008 was earned on money market accounts.
Realized/Unrealized holding gains on trading securities – During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, we recorded unrealized holding losses of $1.95 million on our auction rate securities. Our valuation was estimated by comparing current value based on projected cash flows discounted to the present and taking into account interest.yields of similar illiquid instruments and assumptions about the extent of the failure of the auction process and the amount of discounts demanded in sales of comparable securities. In the first quarter of fiscal 2009, we recorded realized holding gains of $231,000 on redemptions and unrealized holding gains of $31,000 after evaluating our investments in these securities. See note 11 – Marketable Securities.
Provision for Income Taxes — In the second quarter of fiscal 2008, Emerson increased its estimated liability for California franchise taxes due and owing by its predecessor in the amount of $3.7 million. California franchise taxes are effectively tax on income and are recorded as such. In the third quarter of fiscal 2008, Emerson reduced its estimated liability by $1.0 million as a result of having resolved the matter. See Note 6 — “Income Taxes”. Separate from the decrease in the liability associated with California franchise taxes, ourOur provision for income taxes, which primarily represents the deferred tax charges associated with our profits in the United States, resulted in a benefit of $1.4 millionwas $527,000 for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2008,2009, or 1.8%1.2% of net revenues, as compared to a provision of $1.9 million$379,000 for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2007,2008, or 2.1%0.7% of net revenues. Separate from the California franchise tax paid on amounts due and owing by Emerson’s predecessor, we had a benefit for income taxes for the nine month period of fiscal 2008 of $719,000, or 0.4% of net revenues, as compared to a provision of $3.8 million, or 1.6% of net revenues, for the nine month period of fiscal 2007.
Net Income (Loss) As a result of the foregoing factors, Emerson recognizedour net income of $1.1 million (1.5% of net revenues)(loss) was $929,000 for the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 20082009 as compared to net income of $3.7 million (4.1%$442,000 (0.8% of net revenues) in the thirdfirst quarter of fiscal 2007. For the nine month period of fiscal 2008, our net (loss) was $1.7 million as compared to net income of $8.1 million for the nine month period of fiscal 2007.2008.

15


Liquidity and Capital Resources
     As of December 31, 2007, EmersonJune 30, 2008, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $20.4$16.6 million, compared to approximately $11.1$23.2 million at December 31, 2006.June 30, 2007. Working capital was $63.9decreased to $45.3 million at December 31, 2007 and $70.8June 30, 2008 as compared to $67.1 million at December 31, 2006.June 30, 2007. The increasedecrease in cash and cash equivalents of approximately $9.3$6.6 million was primarily due to increasesinvestments in cash provided by operating activities, the settlement of a receivable due from affiliatesecurities which have been classified as long-term and the sale of a building, partially offset by cash used for repayment of short-term debt, property and equipment additions, andpartially offset by a change in the paymentamount of taxes,restricted cash which has been pledged to assure the availability of credit facilities as described in the following paragraphs.
     Operating cash flow provided by continuing operating activities was approximately $21.0 million$604,000 for the ninethree months ended December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, resulting from increases in amounts payable for purchasing our products, which are settled primarily through the repayment to Emersonuse of financing provided to an affiliate in the prior fiscal year (see Note 7 — “Related Party Transactions”),letters of credit but also on open account, primarily offset by growth in accounts receivable inon our direct import sales, which represent sales under letter of credit arrangements, and the third quarteramount of fiscal 2008.restricted cash for balances pledged to assure the availability of credit facilities.
     Net cash provided by investing activities was $1.3$1.5 million for the ninethree months ended December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 and resulted primarily from the sale of a building in Macao,partial calls on our auction rate securities offset by purchases of showroom furniture and computer equipment for our US operations as well as tooling by a foreign subsidiary related to sourcing of product and molds delivered to Capetronic, a related party, to manufacture musical instruments (see Note 7).product.
     Net cash used by financing activities was $3.7 million$18,000 for the ninethree months ended December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, resulting primarily from the pay downrepayments of loans of a foreign subsidiary.long-term borrowings.
     On December 23, 2005, we entered into a $45.0 million Revolving Credit Agreement with Wachovia Bank. This credit facility provides for revolving loans subject to individual maximums which, in the aggregate, are not to exceed the lesser of $45.0 million or a “Borrowing Base” as defined in the loan agreement. The Borrowing Base amount is established by specified percentages of eligible accounts receivables and inventories and bears interest ranging from Prime plus 0.00% to 0.50% or, at our election, the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 1.25% to 2.25% depending on excess availability. Pursuant to the loan agreement, we are restricted from, among other things, paying certain cash dividends, and entering into certain transactions without the lender’s prior consent and are subject to certain leverage financial covenants. Borrowings under the loan agreement are secured by substantially all of our tangible assets.
     At December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, there were approximately $11.1$20.4 million of letters of credit outstanding under this facility. There were no borrowings outstanding at December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 under this facility. At December 31 2007,June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with the covenants on our credit facilities.
     At June 30, 2008 the Company deposited $2.0 million with Wachovia, to secure on a dollar for dollar basis, additional letter of credit availability. As such, this amount has been classified on the balance sheet as restricted cash.
As a result of Emerson electing to cancel its foreign bank facilities in December 2007, our foreign subsidiaries maintain no credit facilities as of December 31, 2007.
     At December 31, 2007, as a result of Emerson electing to cancel its foreign bank facilities, the requirement to maintain pledged deposits with foreign banks for our foreign subsidiaries was eliminated. As such, $3.0 million in certificates of deposit held at these banks have been returned.
     Short-Term Liquidity.Liquidity is impacted by seasonality in that Emerson generally records the majority of its annual sales in the quarters ending September and December. This requires Emerson to maintain higher inventory levels during the quarters ending June and September, therefore increasing the working capital needs during these periods. Additionally, Emerson receives the largest percentage of product returns in the quarter ending March. The higher level of returns during this period adversely impacts collection activity, and therefore liquidity. Management believes that continued sales margin improvement and the policies in place for returned products should continue to favorably impact cash flow. In the ninethree months ended December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, products representing approximately 27%36.5% of net revenues were imported directly to Emerson’s customers. This contributes significantly to Emerson’s liquidity in that this inventory does not need to be financed.

16


Emerson’s principal existing sources of cash are generated from operations and borrowings available under it’sits revolving credit facilities. As of December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, Emerson had $45$24.6 million of borrowing capacity available under it’sits $45.0 million revolving credit facilities, as there were $11.1$20.4 million of letters of credit outstanding, and no outstanding loans. Emerson believes that it’sits existing sources of cash, including cash flows generated from operations, will be sufficient to support existing operations over the next 12 months; however, management may decide to raise additional financing, which may include the issuance of equity securities, or the incurrence of additional debt, in connection with existing operations or if we elect to pursue acquisitions.
     The following summarizes obligations at December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 for the periods shown (in thousands):
                                        
 Payment due by period Payment due by period (1)
 Less than More than 5 Less than More than 5
 Total 1 year 1 — 3 years 3 — 5 years years Total 1 year 1 - 3 years 3 - 5 years years
         —          
Capital lease obligations $209 $73 $123 $13   $206 $83 $109 $14 $  — 
Lease-related party 204 204    
Leases- non-affiliate 5,386 1,718 2,836 832  
Operating lease obligations – related party 183 183    
Operating lease obligations – non-affiliate 4,494 1,753 2,437 304  
         —          
Total $5,799 $1,995 $2,959 $845   $4,883 $2,019 $2,546 $318 $ 
                    
(1)Amounts in the above table do not include a reserve of approximately $149,000 related to uncertain tax positions. The Company is not able to reasonably estimate when, if ever, these reserves would result in actual cash payments.
     There were no material capital expenditure commitments and no substantial commitments for purchase orders outside the normal purchase orders used to secure product as of December 31, 2007.June 30, 2008.
Other Events and Circumstances Pertaining to Liquidity
     The Company entered into foreign exchange forward contracts (denominated in U.S.US and Hong Kong dollar), based on economic and market conditions and solely for the purpose of speculative trading, (See “Note 10. Financial Instruments” and Item 4.b “Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting” ). The contract terms are for fixed periods and at DecemberMarch 31, 2007,2008, the Company’s foreign exchange forward contracts had expiration dates that ranged from one to sixtwo months, with notional amounts of $11$10 million.
     At each balance sheet date the Company accounts for its foreienforeign exchange forward contracts as a current asset with corresponding realized or unrealized gains and losses included in the income statement. Realized gains of $281,308 and unrealized gains of $233,547$132,647 have been recorded as non-operating income at December 31,in the three months ended June 30, 2008. Realized gains of $13, 835 were recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2007. There were no
     At June 30, 2008, all foreign exchange forward contracts to report at December 31, 2006.have expired and the Company has not entered into any new contracts.
Critical Accounting Policies
     For the ninethree month period ended December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, there were no significant changes to accounting policies from those reported in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.2008.
Inflation, Foreign Currency, and Interest Rates
     Neither inflation nor currency fluctuations had a significant effect on our results of operations during the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Our exposure to currency fluctuations has been minimized by the use of U.S. dollar denominated purchase orders. We purchase virtually all of our products from manufacturers located in China.
     The interest on any borrowings under our credit facilities would be based on the prime and LIBOR rate.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     There have been no significant changes from items disclosed in Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.2008.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a)Disclosure controls and procedures.

17


During fiscal 2007,the first three months of Fiscal 2008, our management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) related to the recording, processing, summarization and reporting of information in our reports that we file with the SEC.Securities and Exchange Commission. These disclosure controls and procedures have been designed to ensure that material information relating to us, including our

17


subsidiaries, is made known to our management, including these officers, by other of our employees, and that this information is recorded, processed, summarized, evaluated and reported, as applicable, within the time periods specified in the SEC’sSecurities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Due to the inherent limitations of control systems, not all misstatements may be detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. Our controls and procedures can only provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the above objectives have been met.
Based on their evaluation as of December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that for the reasons set forth below under “Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting”; our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) were notAct) are effective to reasonably ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SECSecurities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.forms and that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
Emerson has operated for many years under a system of internal controls governing the purchase and sale of inventory and the use of its credit facilities to support its working capital needs. This system was designed in order to insure participation by and coordination among employees involved in each of the major functional areas of Emerson, namely sales, procurement and finance both in the United States and in its Asian offices.
The process begins with a monthly sales meeting in the United States chaired by the President of Sales and attended by sales, treasury, sales planning and production scheduling personnel. At this meeting, sales projections, pipeline and forecasts for all customers and for all models are reviewed and the foundation for the Monthly Buy Package is established. Subsequent to the monthly sales meeting, a Monthly Buy Package is developed, including a schedule of production needs by month, model and quantity. This package is forwarded to the Director of Sales and the Director of the Corporate Treasury and, when approved, forwarded to the Macao office.
Experienced personnel in Macao then review and combine all buy packages received and schedule letters of credit and on-account buys with manufacturers covering production for the month necessary to fill outstanding orders and the likely needs of customers on a timely basis. The report from Macao is then sent for final approval to the Director of the Corporate Treasury and the Treasurer. This system of internal controls provides that no letter of credit may be authorized for issuance and no open account production is permitted to begin until this final approval is received.
Once approved by Treasury, the package is sent back to the Macao office for execution of the buy transactions. Orders are placed and letters of credit are issued as needed. The Macao office produces and forwards to the Treasury and Finance Departments a Daily Activity Report which includes, among other things, letter of credit number, dollar amount, model number, manufacturer and quantity produced. All information on the Daily Activity Report should be able to be traced back to and tie in with the original approved Buy Package. This information becomes the basis on which Emerson’s cash and credit line are managed on a daily basis.
Emerson’s primary domestic bank is notified of each letter of credit presented for payment and, when paid, the applicable item is removed from the Daily Activity Report. In summary, this system, which was developed over many years, was intended to ensure that every major function within the firm participates at every stage of the purchase, sale and finance process and that there is centralized and continuing monitoring of the Company’s liquidity position.
In two transactions described in Note 7 (Related Party Transactions) our financial statements included in this report on Form 10-Q, Emerson’s internal control process was bypassed. In the transaction involving the 42” plasma televisions, purchase orders were issued, letters of credit were authorized and funds were advanced as a deposit with Capetronic, an affiliate of Grande, with only minimal involvement from the Treasury, Sales or Finance Departments under Emerson’s system of internal control. In addition, the distributor to which Emerson sold the television sets remitted approximately 25% of the monies due to Capetronic rather than to Emerson which then received the funds at a later time. Documentation of the entire transaction was also deficient.
The same infirmities (other than the payment by the distributor to Capetronic rather than Emerson) are present in the transactions involving the H.H. Scott LCD sets. In addition, there is virtually no documentation available to Emerson setting forth its participation in the transactions beyond the detail information set forth in the issued Letters of Credit. However, the available information shows that some of the Company’s credit was utilized to fund transactions for the benefit of Grande affiliates and in which Emerson then had no financial interest whatsoever.

18


As described under Note 7 to our financial statements, during the quarter ended December 31, 2006, we and affiliates of Grande entered into a number of related party transactions that resulted in loans and letters of credit under our credit facility being issued for the benefit of affiliates of Grande. These loans were (i) subject to a repayment schedule that commenced on April 1, 2007 and ended on June 3, 2007 as set forth in the Note and (ii) guaranteed by Grande. All obligations under the Note were satisfied by June 3, 2007. The Company’s Audit Committee conducted an initial review of these transactions and concluded that these financing transactions (i) were not made on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral and return on investment, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with unrelated persons, and (ii) involved more than the normal risk of collectibility. In addition, the review of the transactions revealed material weaknesses in the Company’s internal controls. The deficiencies that were uncovered related to (i) one or more senior managers failing to follow the Company’s existing internal controls over purchases and sales of inventory and utilization of the Company’s credit facilities and (ii) the lack of documentation related to such related party transactions. These events have also raised concerns about the Company’s overall control environment. Although such events may not result in any adjustment to the Company’s financial statements, such events reflect material weaknesses with respect to the Company internal controls.
The Company’s Audit Committee has received from an independent investigator a report with respect to certain of the related party transactions entered into by the Company, including its subsidiaries, with affiliates of Grande Holdings from December 2005 to the present, and is continuing its independent review into such transactions.
As part of the Company’s remedial actions, on February 20, 2007, the Board of Directors appointed a committee of the Board of Directors comprised of Adrian Ma, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Greenfield Pitts, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Michael A.B. Binney, the Company’s President — International Operations, and Eduard Will, the Company’s former President — North American Operations and current Vice Chairman, to internally review and approve all related party transactions in an amount in excess of $500,000. Following review and approval by this newly formed committee, all such related party transactions are required to be reviewed and approved by the Company’s Audit Committee.
As part of its efforts to improve internal controls, the Company retained the consulting affiliate of a national accounting firm to assist it in its review of internal controls as mandated by SOX Section 404. In addition, on December 13, 2007, the Board of Directors adopted, and management is in the process of implementing, a series of governance and control policies and procedures designed to accomplish the same purpose.
In performing its normal quarterly review procedures, senior corporate financial management determined that personnel had authorized or permitted to occur, without the knowledge of or communication to senior corporate financial management, two foreign exchange transactions and a series of small related party transactions involving the sourcing for and subsequent sale of inventory to affiliates of Grande. The Company recognized modest amounts of profit from each of these transactions. For further information, see Note 10 “Financial Instruments”, “Other Events and Circumstances Pertaining to Liquidity” and Note 7 - “Related Party Transactions”.
Except as set forth above, thereThere have been no changes in our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter to which this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controlscontrol over financial reporting.
PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     There currently is pending against three directorsIn late July 2008, the Court of Chancery of the Company (Messrs. Ho, MaState of Delaware (the “Court”) entered an Order (the “Order”) consolidating for all purposes two previously disclosed derivative actions (the “Berkowitz” and Binney) a purported derivative action“Pinchuk” lawsuits) filed on the Company’sour behalf by twoagainst certain of its shareholders.our current and former directors.  The complaint, which has not yet been answered by the defendants, allegescomplaints in each of such actions alleged that the named defendants each of whom also is an executive officer of Grande Holdings, the Company’s controlling shareholder, violated their fiduciary duties to Emersonus in connection with a number of previously disclosed related party transactions with affiliates of Grande Holdings.Holdings, our controlling shareholder.  The Order also organizes counsel for the plaintiffs in the consolidated action, relieves the defendants of their obligation to answer the “Berkowitz” and “Pinchuk” complaints and contemplates the filing of a consolidated complaint as soon as practicable. The recovery, in such lawsuit, if any, in the consolidated action, will inure to Emerson’sour benefit.
     Except for the litigation matters described above, we are not currently a party to any legal proceedings other than litigation matters, in most cases involving ordinary and routine claims incidental to our business. We cannot estimate with certainty our ultimate legal and financial liability with respect to such pending litigation matters. However, we believe, based on our examination of such matters, that our ultimate liability will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     There were no changes in any risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007.2008.
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Share Repurchases:

19


     For the quarter ended December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, the Company did not repurchase any shares under Emerson Radio Corp.’s common stock share repurchase program. The share repurchase program was publicly announced in September 2003 to repurchase up to 2,000,000 shares of Emerson’s outstanding common stock. Share repurchases are made from time to time in open market transactions in such amounts as determined in the discretion of Emerson’s management within the guidelines set forth by Rule 10b-18 under the Securities Exchange Act. Prior to the December 31, 2007June 30, 2008 quarter, the Company repurchased 1,267,623 shares under this program. As of December 31, 2007,June 30, 2008, the maximum number of shares that are available to be repurchased under Emerson Radio Corp.’s common share repurchase program was 732,377. No shares have been repurchased under the program since June 14, 2005.

2018


ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
     (a) None
     (b) None
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
     The Annual Meeting of the Stockholders of the Company (the “Annual Meeting”) was held on December 13, 2007, at which time the stockholders of the Company elected the following individuals to serve as directors of the Company until the next annual meeting of stockholders of the Company and until their successors are duly elected and qualified: Michael A.B. Binney, W. Michael Driscoll, Christopher Ho, Adrian Ma, Mirzan Mahathir, David R. Peterson, Greenfield Pitts, Kareem E. Sethi, Eduard Will and Norbert R. Wirsching. There were 27,129,832 shares of capital stock of the Company outstanding and entitled to vote at the record date for the Annual Meeting. There were present at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, stockholders holding 26,047,528 shares of common stock of the Company, which represented approximately 96% of the total capital stock outstanding and entitled to vote.
          The matters voted upon at the Annual Meeting and the results of the voting at the Annual Meeting are set forth below:
          (i) With respect to the election of directors of the Company by the holders of common stock of the Company, the persons named below received the following number of votes:
         
  Votes Votes
Name For Withheld
Michael A.B. Binney  22,336,344   3,711,184 
W. Michael Driscoll  25,474,102   573,426 
Christopher Ho  22,337,184   3,710,344 
Adrian Ma  22,315,330   3,732,198 
Mirzan Mahathir  24,253,118   1,794,410 
David R. Peterson  24,262,181   1,785,347 
Greenfield Pitts  22,321,881   3,725,647 
Kareem E. Sethi  24,323,609   1,732,919 
Eduard Will  22,328,844   3,718,684 
Norbert R. Wirsching  25,480,565   566,963 
          (ii) With respect to the proposal to ratify the appointment of Moore Stephens P.C. to serve as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Company for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2008, the votes cast by the holders of common stock of the Company were as follows: 24,517,626 shares were voted in favor, 330,028 shares were voted against, and 1,199,873 shares abstained from voting on the proposal. There were no broker non-votes with respect to such proposal.None
ITEM 5. Other Information.
     None
ITEM 6. Exhibits.
 3.1Bylaws of Emerson Radio Corp., as amended.
 
31.1 Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
 
 
31.2 Certification of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
 
 
32 Certification of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
 
* filed herewith

2119


SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
     
 EMERSON RADIO CORP.
(Registrant)
 
 /s/ Adrian Ma  
Date: FebruaryAugust 14, 2008 Adrian Ma  
 Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
 
 
  
 /s/ Greenfield Pitts  
Date: FebruaryAugust 14, 2008 Greenfield Pitts  
 Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) 
 

2220