UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2010

~~FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009~~


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: ~~0-50363~~001-33097

GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


MARYLAND		02-0681276
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
organization)

1521 WESTBRANCH DRIVE, SUITE 200
MCLEAN, VIRGINIA 22102
(Address of principal executive office)

(703) 287-5800
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yeso Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting ~~company (as defined~~company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange ~~Act).~~Act. (Check one):


Large ~~Accelerated Filer~~accelerated filero	Accelerated ~~Filer~~filerþ	~~Non-Accelerated Filer~~Non-accelerated filero	Smaller ~~Reporting Company~~reporting companyo.
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yeso Noþ .

The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding as of ~~October~~April 30, ~~2009~~2010 was ~~8,563,264.~~8,545,264.

GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008			March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
ASSETS
Real estate, at cost	$	389,699,961		$	390,562,138		$	391,095,912		$	390,753,892
Less: accumulated depreciation		31,754,201			24,757,576			36,502,598			34,111,952

Total real estate, net		357,945,760			365,804,562			354,593,314			356,641,940

Lease intangibles, net		28,962,361			31,533,843			27,250,453			28,177,461
Mortgage note receivable		10,000,000			10,000,000			10,000,000			10,000,000
Cash and cash equivalents		2,787,398			4,503,578			3,327,368			3,096,598
Restricted cash		3,049,099			2,677,561			2,957,263			2,633,538
Funds held in escrow		2,697,354			2,150,919			2,565,860			2,487,680
Deferred rent receivable		8,574,415			7,228,811			9,358,748			8,975,196
Deferred financing costs, net		3,344,509			4,383,446			2,913,702			3,136,055
Due from adviser (Refer to Note 2)		—			108,898
Prepaid expenses and other assets		920,787			707,167			1,653,392			1,716,905


TOTAL ASSETS	$	418,281,683		$	429,098,785		$	414,620,100		$	416,865,373


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES
Mortgage notes payable	$	253,372,911		$	255,111,173		$	252,117,127		$	252,761,651
Short-term loan and borrowings under line of credit		31,800,000			31,500,000			34,900,000			33,200,000
Deferred rent liability		2,558,299			3,147,472			2,970,159			3,213,195
Asset retirement obligation liability		2,268,997			2,190,192			2,342,891			2,305,644
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,417,884			2,673,787			1,618,406			2,086,741
Due to adviser (Refer to Note 2)		1,271,766			—			1,394,007			1,213,640
Obligation under capital lease		244,609			235,378			250,764			247,686
Rent received in advance, security deposits and funds held in escrow		4,026,157			3,745,523			3,922,738			3,386,274


Total Liabilities		296,960,623			298,603,525			299,516,092			298,414,831


STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Redeemable preferred stock, $0.001 par value; $25 liquidation preference; 2,300,000 shares authorized and 2,150,000 shares issued and outstanding		2,150			2,150
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 47,700,000 shares authorized and 8,563,264 shares issued and outstanding		8,563			8,563
Redeemable preferred stock, $0.001 par value; $25 liquidation preference; 2,300,000 shares authorized and 2,150,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively								2,150			2,150
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 47,700,000 shares authorized and 8,545,264 and 8,563,264 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively								8,545			8,563
Additional paid in capital		170,622,581			170,622,581			170,378,699			170,622,581
Notes receivable — employees		(2,551,601	)		(2,595,886	)
Notes receivable - employees								(2,261,555	)		(2,304,999	)
Distributions in excess of accumulated earnings		(46,760,633	)		(37,542,148	)		(53,023,831	)		(49,877,753	)


Total Stockholders’ Equity		121,321,060			130,495,260			115,104,008			118,450,542


TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	418,281,683		$	429,098,785		$	414,620,100		$	416,865,373

GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,						For the three months ended March 31,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
Operating revenues
Rental income	$	10,383,002		$	10,131,678		$	31,150,423		$	29,191,410		$	10,415,066		$	10,388,244
Interest income from mortgage note receivable		191,667			216,446			568,750			673,548			187,500			187,500
Tenant recovery revenue		82,425			83,144			247,593			253,495			82,410			82,432

Total operating revenues		10,657,094			10,431,268			31,966,766			30,118,453			10,684,976			10,658,176


Operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization		3,284,723			3,256,602			9,875,156			9,416,786			3,321,871			3,307,802
Property operating expenses		219,537			222,647			687,129			665,103			244,354			236,812
Due diligence expense		—			2,158			16,433			4,282			21,876			9,547
Base management fee (Refer to Note 2)		342,743			404,108			1,073,041			1,255,833			312,564			372,648
Incentive fee (Refer to Note 2)		835,003			793,787			2,433,945			2,300,286			846,192			786,289
Administration fee (Refer to Note 2)		293,075			238,241			774,636			724,978			231,884			224,354
Professional fees		105,368			117,857			466,529			362,584			175,610			235,198
Insurance		50,757			43,354			147,561			126,947
Directors fees		49,459			54,702			149,547			161,202
Stockholder related expenses		32,914			42,232			204,806			271,430
Insurance expense														56,325			48,678
Directors’ fees														49,418			49,702
Stockholder-related expenses														45,216			83,647
Asset retirement obligation expense		36,060			34,711			106,441			97,077			37,247			34,907
General and administrative		19,643			10,079			45,647			40,582			17,829			10,549

Total operating expenses before credit from Adviser		5,269,282			5,220,478			15,980,871			15,427,090			5,360,386			5,400,133


Credit to incentive fee		(200,264	)		(205,876	)		(564,968	)		(941,928	)		-			(235,081	)

Total operating expenses		5,069,018			5,014,602			15,415,903			14,485,162			5,360,386			5,165,052


Other income (expense)
Interest income from temporary investments		524			4,559			17,989			20,796			265			17,281
Interest income — employee loans		48,130			49,624			145,878			152,620
Interest income - employee loans														43,101			48,886
Other income		—			7,500			11,320			56,493			3,316			-
Interest expense		(4,521,848	)		(4,354,381	)		(13,443,405	)		(12,106,885	)		(4,284,939	)		(4,487,560	)

Total other expense		(4,473,194	)		(4,292,698	)		(13,268,218	)		(11,876,976	)		(4,238,257	)		(4,421,393	)


Income from continuing operations		1,114,882			1,123,968			3,282,645			3,756,315			1,086,333			1,071,731


Discontinued operations
Income from discontinued operations		4,070			17,591			42,823			21,392			-			17,838
Gain on sale of real estate		160,038			—			160,038			—

Total discontinued operations		164,108			17,591			202,861			21,392			-			17,838


Net income		1,278,990			1,141,559			3,485,506			3,777,707			1,086,333			1,089,569

Distributions attributable to preferred stock		(1,023,437	)		(1,023,437	)		(3,070,312	)		(3,070,312	)		(1,023,438	)		(1,023,437	)

Net income available to common stockholders	$	255,553		$	118,122		$	415,194		$	707,395		$	62,895		$	66,132


Earnings per weighted average common share — basic & diluted
Income from continuing operations (net of distributions attributable to preferred stock)	$	0.01		$	0.01		$	0.03		$	0.08		$	0.01		$	0.01
Discontinued operations		0.02			0.00			0.02			0.00			0.00			0.00


Net income available to common stockholders	$	0.03		$	0.01		$	0.05		$	0.08		$	0.01		$	0.01


Weighted average shares outstanding- basic & diluted		8,563,264			8,565,264			8,563,264			8,565,264			8,558,664			8,563,264

GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	For the nine months ended September 30,						For the three months ended March 31,
	2009			2008			2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	3,485,506		$	3,777,707		$	1,086,333		$	1,089,569
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations		9,885,571			9,435,690			3,321,871			3,314,100
Amortization of deferred financing costs		1,144,991			806,075			272,353			375,194
Amortization of deferred rent asset and liability		(399,052	)		(399,049	)
Amortization of deferred rent asset and liability, net								(179,662	)		(133,017	)
Accretion of obligation under capital lease		9,232			7,234			3,078			3,077
Asset retirement obligation expense, including discontinued operations		106,902			98,394			37,247			35,367
Gain on sale of real estate		(160,038	)		—
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets		(413,620	)		(110,382	)		(430,387	)		(17,218	)
Increase in deferred rent receivable		(1,564,298	)		(1,763,153	)		(446,926	)		(562,789	)
Increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and amount due adviser		124,761			182,694
(Decrease) increase in rent received in advance		(90,904	)		171,191
(Decrease) increase in accounts payable, accrued expenses, and amount due adviser								(287,968	)		113,028
Increase (decrease) in rent received in advance								212,739			(120,758	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		12,129,051			12,206,401			3,588,678			4,096,553


Cash flows from investing activities:
Real estate investments		(85,534	)		(48,935,032	)		(342,020	)		(54,308	)
Leasing commissions paid		(298,270	)		—			(4,217	)		-
Proceeds from sale of real estate		1,089,031			—
Receipts from lenders for reserves held in escrow		853,264			630,033			404,462			272,818
Payments to lenders for reserves held in escrow		(1,399,699	)		(1,216,896	)		(482,642	)		(471,355	)
Increase in restricted cash		(371,538	)		(723,464	)		(323,725	)		(1,102,902	)
Deposits on future acquisitions		—			(1,650,000	)
Deposits refunded or applied against real estate investments		200,000			1,750,000
Deposits refunded								250,000			200,000

Net cash used in investing activities		(12,746	)		(50,145,359	)		(498,142	)		(1,155,747	)


Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings under mortgage notes payable		—			48,015,000
Principal repayments on mortgage notes payable		(1,738,262	)		(1,171,849	)		(644,524	)		(590,881	)
Principal repayments on employee notes receivable		44,285			140,077			43,444			5,671
Borrowings from line of credit		49,700,000			62,600,000			4,200,000			28,000,000
Repayments on line of credit		(29,400,000	)		(56,800,000	)		(2,500,000	)		(9,200,000	)
Repayment of short-term loan		(20,000,000	)		—			-			(20,000,000	)
Receipts from tenants for reserves		2,541,657			1,746,804			525,330			1,471,309
Payments to tenants from reserves		(2,197,535	)		(1,555,146	)		(202,354	)		(378,940	)
Increase in security deposits		27,415			531,806			749			10,533
Payments for deferred financing costs		(106,054	)		(1,153,228	)		(50,000	)		(53,561	)
Distributions paid for common and preferred		(12,703,991	)		(12,706,239	)		(4,232,411	)		(4,234,665	)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(13,832,485	)		39,647,225
Net cash used in financing activities								(2,859,766	)		(4,970,534	)


Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,716,180	)		1,708,267
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents								230,770			(2,029,728	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		4,503,578			1,356,408			3,096,598			4,503,578


Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	2,787,398		$	3,064,675		$	3,327,368		$	2,473,850


NON-CASH INVESTING ACTIVITIES
NON-CASH OPERATING, INVESTING AND FINANCING INFORMATION

Increase in asset retirement obligation	$	—		$	245,195		$	-		$	245,196


Fixed rate debt assumed in connection with acquisitions	$	—		$	6,461,603		$	-		$	6,461,603


Forfeiture of common stock in satisfaction of employee note receivable							$	243,900		$	-

GLADSTONE COMMERCIAL CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
~~(Unaudited)~~

1. Organization and Significant Accounting Policies

Gladstone Commercial Corporation (the “Company”) ~~is a Maryland corporation that~~was incorporated on February 14, 2003 under the General Corporation Law of Maryland. The Company operates in a manner so as to qualify as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes and ~~was incorporated on February 14, 2003 under the General Corporation Law of Maryland,~~exists primarily for the purpose of engaging in the business of investing in real estate properties net leased to creditworthy entities and making mortgage loans to creditworthy entities. Subject to certain restrictions and limitations, the business of the Company is managed by Gladstone Management Corporation, a Delaware corporation (the “Adviser”).

Subsidiaries

The Company conducts substantially all of its operations through a subsidiary, Gladstone Commercial Limited Partnership, a Delaware limited partnership (the “Operating Partnership”). As the Company currently owns all of the general and limited partnership interests of the Operating Partnership through GCLP Business Trust I and II as ~~disclosed~~discussed in more detail below, the financial position and results of operations of the Operating Partnership ~~are consolidated with those of the Company.~~

Gladstone Commercial Partners, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Commercial Partners”) and a subsidiary of the Company, was organized to engage in any lawful act or activity for which a limited liability company may be organized in Delaware. Commercial Partners has the power to make and perform all contracts and to engage in all activities to carry out the purposes of the Company, and all other powers available to it as a limited liability company. As the Company currently owns all of the membership interests of Commercial Partners, the financial position and results of operations of Commercial Partners are consolidated with those of the Company.

Gladstone Commercial Lending, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Gladstone Commercial Lending”) and a subsidiary of the Company, was created to conduct all operations related to real estate mortgage loans of the Company. As the Operating Partnership currently owns all of the membership interests of Gladstone Commercial Lending, the financial position and results of operations of Gladstone Commercial Lending are consolidated with those of the Company.

Gladstone Commercial Advisers, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Commercial Advisers”) and a subsidiary of the Company, is a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”), which was created to collect all non-qualifying income related to the Company’s real estate portfolio. It is currently anticipated that this income will predominately consist of fees received by the Company related to the leasing of real estate. There have been no such fees earned to date. Since the Company owns 100% of the voting securities of Commercial Advisers, the financial position and results of operations of Commercial Advisers are consolidated with those of the Company.

GCLP Business Trust I and GCLP Business Trust II, ~~subsidiaries~~each a subsidiary and business trust of the Company, ~~each are business trusts~~were formed under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts on December 28, 2005. The Company transferred its 99% limited partnership interest in the Operating Partnership to GCLP Business Trust I in exchange for 100 trust shares. Commercial Partners transferred its 1% general partnership interest in the Operating Partnership to GCLP Business Trust II in exchange for 100 trust shares.

of normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair statement of financial statements for the interim period have been included. The interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2010.

Investments in Real Estate

The Company records investments in real estate at cost and capitalizes improvements and replacements when they extend the useful life or improve the efficiency of the asset. The Company expenses costs of repairs and maintenance as such costs are incurred. The Company computes depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life ofor 39 years for buildings and improvements, ~~five~~5 to ~~seven~~7 years for equipment and fixtures and the shorter of the useful life or the remaining lease term for tenant improvements and leasehold interests.

The Company accounts for its acquisitions of real estate in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, “Business Combinations,” which requires that the purchase price of real estate to be recorded at fair value and allocated to the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land, building, tenant improvements, long-term debt and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases, the value of unamortized lease origination costs, the value of tenant relationships and the value of capital lease obligations, based in each case on their fair values. ASC 805 also requires that all expenses related to the acquisition be expensed as incurred, rather than capitalized into the cost of the acquisition as had been the previous accounting.

Management’s estimates of value are made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis). Factors considered by ~~management~~Management in its analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions, and costs to execute similar leases. The Company also considers information obtained about each property as a result of its pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. In estimating carrying costs, ~~management~~Management also includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, which primarily range from nine to eighteen months, depending on specific local market conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction.

The Company allocates purchase price to the fair value of the tangible assets of an acquired property by valuing the property as if it were vacant. The “as-if-vacant” value is allocated to land, building, and tenant improvements based on ~~management’s~~Management’s determination of the relative fair values of these assets. Real estate depreciation expense on these tangible assets, including discontinued operations, was approximately $2.4 million and ~~$7.1~~$2.3 million for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~respectively, and approximately $2.3 million and $6.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,~~ respectively.

Above-market and below-market in-place lease values for owned properties are recorded based on the present value (using an interest rate which reflects the risks associated with the leases acquired) of the difference between (i) the contractual amounts to be paid pursuant to the in-place leases and (ii) ~~management’s~~Management’s estimate of fair market lease rates for the corresponding in-place leases, measured over a period equal to the remaining non-cancelable term of the lease. The capitalized above-market lease values, included in the accompanying balance sheet as part of deferred rent receivable, are amortized as a reduction of rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. Total amortization related to above-market lease values was approximately $63,000 ~~and $190,000~~ for ~~both~~each of the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and ~~2008, respectively.~~2009. The capitalized below-market lease values,

unamortized lease origination costs, and customer relationship intangible values, are allocated based on ~~management’s~~Management’s evaluation of the specific characteristics of each tenant’s lease and the Company’s overall relationship with that respective tenant. Characteristics to be considered by ~~management~~Management in allocating these values include the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and the Company’s expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors.

The value of in-place leases and unamortized lease origination costs are amortized to expense over the remaining term of the respective leases, which generally range from 10 to 15 years. The value of customer relationship intangibles, which is the benefit to the Company resulting from the likelihood of an existing tenant renewing its lease, are amortized to expense over the remaining term and any anticipated renewal periods in the respective leases, but in no event does the amortization period for intangible assets exceed the remaining depreciable life of the building. Should a tenant terminate its lease, the unamortized portion of the above-market and below-market lease values, in-place lease values, unamortized lease origination costs and customer relationship intangibles will be immediately charged to the related income or expense. Total amortization expense related to these intangible assets, including discontinued operations, was approximately $0.9 million ~~and $2.8 million~~ for ~~both~~each of the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008,~~ respectively.

Impairment

Investments in Real Estate

The Company accounts for the impairment of real estate in accordance with ASC 360-10-35, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” which requires that the Company periodically review the carrying value of each property to determine if circumstances that indicate impairment in the carrying value of the investment exist or that depreciation periods should be modified. If circumstances support the possibility of impairment, the Company prepares a projection of the undiscounted future cash flows, without interest charges, of the specific property and determines if the investment in such property is recoverable. If impairment is indicated, the carrying value of the property would be written down to its estimated fair value based on the Company’s best estimate of the property’s discounted future cash flows. There have been no impairments recognized on real estate assets in the Company’s history.

In light of current economic conditions, the Company performed an impairment analysis of its entire portfolio at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. In performing the analysis, the Company considered such factors as the tenants’ payment history and financial condition, the likelihood of lease renewal, business conditions in the industry in which the tenants operate and whether the carrying value of the real estate has decreased. The Company concluded that none of its properties were impaired, and will continue to monitor its portfolio for any indicators that may change this conclusion.

Provision for Loan Losses

The Company’s accounting policies require that it reflect in its financial statements an allowance for estimated credit losses with respect to mortgage loans that it has made based upon its evaluation of known and inherent risks associated with its private lending assets. Management reflects provisions for loan losses based upon its assessment of general market conditions, its internal risk management policies and credit risk rating system, industry loss experience, its assessment of the likelihood of delinquencies or defaults, and the value of the collateral underlying its investments. Actual losses, if any, could ultimately differ from these estimates. There have been no provisions for loan losses in the Company’s history.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all short-term, ~~highly liquid~~highly-liquid investments that are both readily convertible to cash and have a maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase to be cash ~~equivalents;~~equivalents, except that any such investments purchased with funds held in escrow or similar accounts are classified as restricted cash. Items classified as cash equivalents include money-market deposit accounts. All of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 were held in the custody of one financial institution, and the Company’s balance at times may exceed federally insurable limits.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash consists of security deposits and funds held in escrow for certain tenants. These funds will be released to the tenants upon completion of agreed upon tasks as specified in the lease agreements, mainly consisting of maintenance and repairs on the buildings, and ~~when~~upon receipt by the Company of evidence of insurance and tax ~~payments has been received by the Company.~~payments.

Funds Held in Escrow

Funds held in escrow consist of funds held by certain of the Company’s lenders for properties held as collateral by these lenders. These funds will be released to the Company upon completion of agreed upon tasks as specified in the mortgage agreements, mainly consisting of maintenance and repairs on the buildings, and when evidence of insurance and tax payments has been submitted to the lenders.

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs consist of costs incurred to obtain financing, including legal fees, origination fees and administrative fees. The costs are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method, which approximates the effective interest method over the term of the ~~financing secured.~~secured financing. The Company made payments of approximately ~~$2,000~~$50,000 and ~~$106,000~~$54,000 for deferred financing costs during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~respectively, and $1,097,000 and $1,153,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,~~ respectively. Total amortization expense related to deferred financing costs was approximately ~~$421,000~~$272,000 and ~~$1,145,000~~$375,000 for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~respectively, and $300,000 and $806,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,~~ respectively.

Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets

Prepaid expenses and other assets consist of accounts receivable, interest receivable, prepaid assets and deposits on real estate.

Obligation Under Capital Lease

In conjunction with the Company’s acquisition of a building in Fridley, Minnesota in February 2008, the Company acquired a ground lease on the parking lot of the building, which had a purchase obligation to acquire the land under the ground lease at the end of the term in April 2014 for $300,000. In accordance with ASC 840-10-25, “Leases,” the Company accounted for the ground lease as a capital lease and recorded the corresponding present value of the obligation under the capital lease. The Company recorded total interest expense related to the accretion of the capital lease obligation of approximately ~~$3,100 and $9,200~~$3,000 for each of the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009, respectively,~~March 31, 2010 and ~~approximately $3,100 and $7,200 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, respectively.~~2009.

along with the capitalized above-market lease values of certain acquired properties. Accordingly, the Company determines, in its judgment, to what extent the deferred rent receivable applicable to each specific tenant is ~~collectible.~~collectable. The Company reviews deferred rent receivable, as it relates to straight line rents, on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration the tenant’s payment history, the financial condition of the tenant, business conditions in the industry in which the tenant operates and economic conditions in the geographic area in which the property is located. In the event that the collectability of deferred rent with respect to any given tenant is in doubt, the Company records an allowance for ~~uncollectible~~uncollectable accounts or records a direct write-off of the specific rent receivable. No such reserves have been recorded as of ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

Management considers its loans and other lending investments to be held-for-investment. The Company reflects loans classified as long-term investments at amortized cost, less allowance for loan losses, acquisition premiums or discounts, and deferred loan fees. On occasion, the Company may acquire loans at small premiums or discounts based on the credit characteristics of such loans. These premiums or discounts are recognized as yield adjustments over the lives of the related loans. Loan origination fees, as well as direct loan origination costs, are also deferred and recognized over the lives of the related loans as yield adjustments. If loans with premiums, discounts, or loan origination fees are prepaid, the Company immediately recognizes the unamortized portion as a decrease or increase in the prepayment gain or loss. Interest income is recognized using the effective interest method applied on a loan-by-loan basis. Prepayment penalties or yield maintenance payments from borrowers are recognized as additional income when received.

Tenant recovery revenue includes payments from tenants as reimbursements for franchises taxes, management fees, insurance, and ground lease payments. The Company recognizes tenant recovery revenue in the same periods that it incurs the related expenses.

Income Taxes

The Company has operated and intends to continue to operate in a manner that will allow it to qualify as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and, accordingly, will not be subject to federal income taxes on amounts distributed to stockholders (except income from foreclosure property), provided that it distributes at least 90% of its REIT taxable income to its stockholders and meets certain other conditions. To the extent that the Company satisfies the distribution requirement but distributes less than 100% of its taxable income, the Company will be subject to federal corporate income tax on its undistributed income.

Commercial Advisers is a wholly-owned TRS that is subject to federal and state income taxes. Though Commercial Advisers has had no activity to date, the Company would account for any future income taxes in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740, “Income Taxes.” Under ASC 740-10-25, the Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

Segment Information

ASC 280, “Segment Reporting,” provides standards for public companies relating to the reporting of financial and descriptive information about their operating segments in financial statements. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker or decision making group in determining how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. Company ~~management~~Management is the chief decision making group. As discussed in Note 9, the Company’s operations are derived from two operating segments, one segment purchases real estate (land, buildings and other improvements), which is simultaneously leased to existing users, and the other segment originates mortgage loans and collects principal and interest payments.

Asset Retirement Obligations

ASC 410, “Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligation,” requires an entity to recognize a liability for a conditional asset retirement obligation when incurred if the liability can be reasonably estimated. ASC 410-20-20 clarifies that the term “Conditional Asset Retirement Obligation” refers to a legal obligation (pursuant to existing laws or by contract) to perform an asset retirement activity in which the timing and/or method of settlement are conditional on a future event that may or may not be within the control of the entity. ASC 410-20-25-6 clarifies when an entity would have sufficient information to reasonably estimate the fair value of an asset retirement obligation. The Company has accrued a liability and corresponding increase to the cost of the related properties for disposal related to all properties constructed prior to 1985 that have, or may have, asbestos present in the building. The Company accrued a liability during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of $245,195 related to properties acquired during the period, which reflected the present value of the future obligation. There ~~was~~were no ~~liability~~liabilities accrued during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 or 2009. The Company also recorded ~~expense,~~expenses, including discontinued operations, of approximately ~~$36,000~~$37,000 and ~~$107,000~~$35,000 during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~respectively, and approximately $35,000 and $98,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008,~~ respectively, related to the cumulative accretion of the obligation.

Real Estate Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

ASC 360-10, “Property, Plant, and Equipment,” requires that the results of operations of any properties which have been sold, or are held for sale, be presented as discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated financial statements in both current and prior periods presented. Income items related to held for sale properties are listed separately on the Company’s consolidated income statement. Real estate assets held for sale are measured at the lower of the carrying amount or the fair value, less the cost to sell, and are listed separately on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet. Once properties are listed as held for sale, no further depreciation is recorded.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

On July 1, 2009, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 168, “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles also known as ASC 105, “Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.”ASC 105 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification and identifies it as the single source of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements of non-governmental entities that are presented in conformity with GAAP. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become nonauthoritative. Following the Codification, the Board will not issue new standards in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue Accounting Standards Updates, which will update the Codification, provide background information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the Codification. GAAP was not intended to be changed as a result of the FASB’s Codification project, but it will change the way the guidance is organized and presented. ASC 105 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company adopted this pronouncement during the quarter ended September 30, 2009, and the adoption had no material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

ASC 805, “Business Combinations,” requires that the assets and liabilities of all business combinations be recorded at fair value, with limited exceptions. ASC 805-10-25-23 requires that all expenses related to the acquisition be expensed as incurred, rather than capitalized into the cost of the acquisition as had been the previous accounting. ASC 805 is effective on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual period subsequent to December 15, 2008. The Company adopted this pronouncement effective for the fiscal year beginning January 1, 2009, and the

adoption could have a significant impact on its results of operations because of the requirement to expense costs associated with acquisitions rather than capitalize the costs as has been done in the past. There was no significant impact from the adoption of this pronouncement during the nine months ended September 30, 2009, because there was limited activity during the period related to potential acquisitions.

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820-10 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The adoption had no impact on the Company’s results of operations.

ASC 820-10-35-15A, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” further clarifies the application of the standard in a market that is not active. More specifically, ASC 820-10-35-51E states that significant judgment should be applied to determine if observable data in a dislocated market represents forced liquidations or distressed sales and are not representative of fair value in an orderly transaction. ASC 820-10-35-55A provides further guidance that the use of a reporting entity’s own assumptions about future cash flows and appropriately risk-adjusted discount rates is acceptable when relevant observable inputs are not available. In addition, ASC 820-10-35-55B provides guidance on the level of reliance of broker quotes or pricing services when measuring fair value in a non active market stating that less reliance should be placed on a quote that does not reflect actual market transactions and a quote that is not a binding offer. The guidance is effective upon issuance for all financial statements that have not been issued and any changes in valuation techniques as a result of applying the guidance are accounted for as a change in accounting estimate. The Company adopted these pronouncements during the quarter ended December 31, 2008, and the adoption had no material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

ASC 820-10-35-51A, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures,” provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased when compared with normal market activity for the asset or liability. ASC 820-10-35-51E provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate when a transaction is not orderly. ASC 820-10-35-51D emphasizes that the fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction (not a forced liquidation or distressed sale) between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, and shall be applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted this pronouncement during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and the adoption had no material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

ASC 825-10-50, “Financial Instruments,” requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments for interim reporting periods of publicly traded companies as well as in annual financial statements, whether recognized or not recognized in the statement of financial position. The guidance in ASC 825-10-50 is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009. Early adoption is permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted this pronouncement during the quarter ended March 31, 2009, and the adoption had no material impact on the Company’s results of operations.

ASC 855-10-50, “Subsequent Events,” requires disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and defines the types of subsequent events that should be recognized or nonrecognized. ASC 855-10-50 is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company adopted this pronouncement during the quarter ended June 30, 2009, and the adoption had no material impact on the reporting of its subsequent events.

ASC 860, “Transfers and Servicing,” removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity (“QSPE”) and removes the exception from applying to variable interest entities that are QSPEs. This statement also clarifies the requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting. This statement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009, and is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. The Company ~~does not expect there to be an~~adopted this pronouncement during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and the adoption had no impact ~~from adopting this standard~~ on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

ASC 810-10-25-38, “Consolidation,” amends the consolidation guidance for variable-interest entities (“VIE”) and requires an enterprise to qualitatively assess the determination of the primary beneficiary ~~(or “consolidator”)~~ of a VIE based on whether the entity has the power to direct matters that most significantly impact the activities of the VIE, and had the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE. ASC 810 is effective for the Company’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2010. The Company ~~does not expect there to be an~~adopted this pronouncement during the quarter ended March 31, 2010, and the adoption had no impact ~~from adopting this standard~~ on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires ~~management~~Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts from prior years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. The Company’s property located in Norfolk, Virginia was classified as held for sale during

the quarter ended June 30, 2009 and, as a result, the results of operations related to this property for ~~2008~~all periods presented were reclassified from continuing operations to discontinued ~~operations.~~operations, see Note 5. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income or stockholders’ equity.

2. ~~Related Party~~Related-Party Transactions

The Company is externally managed pursuant to contractual arrangements with its Adviser and ~~a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Adviser,~~ Gladstone Administration, LLC (the “Administrator”), ~~under~~ which ~~its Adviser and Administrator~~collectively employ all of the Company’s personnel and pays their payroll, benefits, and general expenses directly. The Company has an advisory agreement with its Adviser (the “Advisory Agreement”) and an administration agreement with its Administrator (the “Administration Agreement”) ~~with its Administrator.~~. The management services and administrative fees under the Advisory and Administration Agreements are described below. As of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, approximately $1.4 million and $1.2 million were due to the Adviser.

Advisory Agreement

The Advisory Agreement provides for an annual base management fee equal to 2% of the Company’s total stockholders’ equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock (“common stockholders’ equity”), and an incentive fee based on funds from operations (“FFO”). For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded a base management fee of approximately ~~$343,000~~$313,000 and ~~$1,073,000, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded a base management fee of approximately $404,000 and $1,256,000,~~$373,000, respectively. For purposes of calculating the incentive fee, FFO includes any realized capital gains and capital losses, less any distributions paid on preferred stock, but FFO does not include any unrealized capital gains or losses. The incentive fee rewards the Adviser if the Company’s quarterly FFO, before giving effect to any incentive fee (“pre-incentive fee FFO”), exceeds 1.75%, or 7% annualized, (the “hurdle rate”) of total common stockholders’ ~~equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock.~~equity. The Adviser receives 100% of the amount of the pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds the hurdle rate, but is less than 2.1875% of the Company’s ~~pre-incentive fee FFO.~~common stockholders’ equity. The Adviser also receives an incentive fee of 20% of the amount of the Company’s pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds 2.1875%. of common stockholders’ equity.

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded an incentive fee of approximately ~~$835,000~~$846,000 and ~~$2,434,000,~~$786,000, respectively, offset by a credit related to an unconditional and irrevocable voluntary waiver issued by the Adviser of approximately ~~$200,000~~$0 and ~~$565,000,~~$235,000, respectively, ~~for~~resulting in a net incentive fee for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, of approximately ~~$635,000~~$846,000 and $1,869,000, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded an incentive fee of approximately $794,000 and $2,300,000, respectively, offset by a credit related

to an unconditional and irrevocable voluntary waiver issued by the Adviser of approximately $206,000 and $942,000, respectively, for a net incentive fee for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 of approximately $588,000 and $1,358,000,$551,000, respectively. The board of directors of the Company accepted the Adviser’s offer to waive on a quarterly basis a portion of the incentive fee for ~~both~~ the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 ~~and 2008in~~in order to support the current level of distributions to the Company’s stockholders. ~~These waivers were applied through September 30, 2009 and any waived fees~~This waiver may not be recouped by the Adviser in the future. There was no waiver to the incentive fee for the three months ended March 31, 2010.

Administration Agreement

Under the Administration Agreement, the Company pays ~~separately~~ for its allocable portion of the Administrator’s overhead expenses in performing its obligations including, but not limited to, rent for employees of the Administrator, and its allocable portion of the salaries and benefits expenses of its chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, internal counsel, treasurer, investor relations and their respective staffs. The Company’s allocable portion of expenses is derived by multiplying the Administrator’s total allocable expenses by the percentage of the Company’s total assets at the beginning of each quarter in comparison to the total assets of all companies managed by the Adviser under similar agreements. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded an administration fee of approximately ~~$293,000~~$232,000 and ~~$775,000, respectively, and for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Company recorded an administration fee of approximately $238,000 and $725,000,~~$224,000, respectively.

~~in February 2010. Except for the extension of the lease term, all other existing provisions of the lease, including the current rental rate, will remain the same during the extension period.~~

On May 19, 2009, the Company extended the lease on its property located in Eatontown, New Jersey for a period of 15 years, and the tenant has two options to extend the lease for additional periods of 5 years each. The lease was originally set to expire in August 2011, and will now expire in April 2024. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $540,000.

Future operating lease payments from tenants under non-cancelable leases, excluding tenant reimbursement of expenses, ~~and future operating lease payments for discontinued operations,~~ in effect at ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, were as follows:


	Tenant		Tenant
Year	Lease Payments		Lease Payments
Three months ending December 31, 2009	$	9,831,618
2010		38,819,446
Nine months ending December 31, 2010			$	29,150,926
2011		38,525,805		38,657,936
2012		38,614,845		38,751,645
2013		33,261,384		33,402,994
2014		29,025,909		29,172,473
2015				25,078,235
Thereafter	$	160,507,642		135,449,243

Estimated
Year Amortization Expense
Three months ending December 31, 2009 $ 1,363,565
2010 5,339,721
2011 4,875,279
2012 4,229,792
2013 2,292,544
2014 2,036,328
Thereafter $ 8,825,133
The following table summarizes the states in which the Company’s properties are located for leases in place as of March 31, 2010:


					Rental Revenue for
			Number of		the Period Ended		Annualized Base		% of Annualized
State	Square Feet		Leases		March 31, 2010		Rental Revenue		Base Rent
Ohio		1,185,411		11	$	1,867,614	$	7,470,456		17.9	%
Minnesota		547,800		3		1,302,876		5,211,504		12.5	%
North Carolina		695,876		6		948,585		3,794,340		9.1	%
Pennsylvania		623,375		4		763,241		3,052,964		7.3	%
Texas		188,178		4		588,963		2,355,852		5.7	%
Michigan		596,104		2		548,959		2,195,836		5.3	%
Illinois		164,131		2		546,504		2,186,016		5.2	%
Massachusetts		338,508		3		543,522		2,174,088		5.2	%
All Other States		1,964,776		15		3,304,802		13,219,208		31.8	%


Total		6,304,159		50	$	10,415,066	$	41,660,264		100	%

5. Real Estate Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

As of June 30, 2009, the Company classified its property located in Norfolk, Virginia as held for sale under the provisions of ASC 360-10, which requires that the results of operations of any properties which have been sold, or are held for sale, be presented as discontinued operations in the Company’s consolidated financial statements in both current and prior periods presented. The Company received an unsolicited offer from a buyer for this property. On July 17, 2009, the Company sold this property ~~located in Norfolk, Virginia~~ for $1.15 million, ~~for~~and recognized a gain on the sale of approximately $160,000.

~~In addition, on July 21, 2006, the Company sold its two Canadian properties and the Company continues to incur legal fees related to the dissolution of the remaining Canadian entities.~~ The table below summarizes the components of income from discontinued operations:


													For the three months ended March 31,
	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,						2010		2009
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Operating revenue	$	4,452		$	25,875		$	56,202		$	77,626		$	-	$	25,876

Operating expense		(382	)		(8,284	)		(13,379	)		(56,234	)		-		(8,038	)


Income from discontinued operations	$	4,070		$	17,591		$	42,823		$	21,392		$	-	$	17,838

6. Mortgage Note Receivable

On April 15, 2005, the Company originated a mortgage loan in the amount of $10.0 million, collateralized by an office building located in McLean, Virginia, where the Company’s Adviser and Administrator are subtenants in the building. This 12 year mortgage loan accrues interest at the greater of 7.5% per year or the one month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) rate plus 6.0% per year, with a ceiling of 10.0%. The mortgage loan is interest only for the first nine years of the term, with payments of principal commencing after the initial period. The balance of the principal and all interest remaining is due at the end of the 12 year term. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the interest rate was 7.5%.

The fair market value of the mortgage note receivable as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 was approximately ~~$9.5~~$9.3 million, as compared to the carrying value stated above of approximately $10.0 million. The fair market value is calculated based on a discounted cash flow analysis, using an interest rate based on ~~management’s~~Management’s estimate of the interest rate on a mortgage note receivable with comparable terms.

On July 20, 2009, the borrower on the Company’s mortgage loan signed a purchase agreement with a third party to sell the building. Currently, the sale is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2009. The Company signed a letter with its borrower agreeing that if the sale is completed, the Company will accept

~~full repayment of the mortgage loan at the time of sale along with any prepayment penalties associated with the early exit, which management estimates to be approximately $3.0 million.~~

7. Mortgage Notes Payable and Line of Credit ~~and Short-Term Loan~~

The Company’s mortgage notes payable and line of credit ~~and short-term loan~~ as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 are summarized below:


				Principal Balance Outstanding					Date of				Principal Balance Outstanding
	Date of								Issuance/	Principal	Stated Interest Rate at
	Issuance/	Principal	Stated Interest Rate at						Assumption	Maturity Date	March 31, 2010⁽¹⁾		March 31, 2010		December 31, 2009
	Assumption	Maturity Date	September 30, 2009⁽¹⁾	September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008
Fixed-Rate Mortgage Notes Payable:
	03/16/05	04/01/30	6.33%	$	2,901,378	$	2,948,753
	08/25/05	09/01/15	5.33%		21,172,666		21,399,644		03/16/05	04/01/30		6.33%	$	2,867,675	$	2,884,908
	09/12/05	09/01/15	5.21%		12,433,691		12,560,673		08/25/05	09/01/15		5.33%		21,011,020		21,093,917
	12/21/05	12/08/15	5.71%		19,056,322		19,241,117		09/12/05	09/01/15		5.21%		12,343,251		12,389,647
	02/21/06	12/01/13	5.91%		9,228,511		9,344,908		12/21/05	12/08/15		5.71%		18,923,663		18,991,934
	02/21/06	06/30/14	5.20%		19,207,834		19,472,740		02/21/06	12/01/13		5.91%		9,145,484		9,188,044
	03/29/06	04/01/16	5.92%		17,000,000		17,000,000		02/21/06	06/30/14		5.20%		19,020,790		19,116,277
	04/27/06	05/05/16	6.58%		14,080,170		14,281,616		03/29/06	04/01/16		5.92%		17,000,000		17,000,000
	11/22/06	12/01/16	5.76%		14,181,437		14,309,000		04/27/06	05/05/16		6.58%		13,935,975		14,009,918
	12/22/06	01/01/17	5.79%		21,672,370		21,846,000		11/22/06	12/01/16		5.76%		14,089,522		14,136,921
	02/08/07	03/01/17	6.00%		13,775,000		13,775,000		12/22/06	01/01/17		5.79%		21,533,427		21,605,106
	06/05/07	06/08/17	6.11%		14,240,000		14,240,000		02/08/07	03/01/17		6.00%		13,775,000		13,775,000
	09/06/07	12/11/15	5.81%		4,377,989		4,426,393		06/05/07	06/08/17		6.11%		14,240,000		14,240,000
	10/15/07	11/08/17	6.63%		15,701,935		15,828,612		09/06/07	12/11/15		5.81%		4,343,357		4,361,144
	08/29/08	06/01/16	6.80%		6,328,608		6,421,717		10/15/07	11/08/17		6.63%		15,609,132		15,657,330
	09/15/08	10/01/10⁽²⁾	6.85%		48,015,000		48,015,000		08/29/08	06/01/16		6.80%		6,263,831		6,296,505
									09/15/08	10/01/10⁽²⁾		6.85%		48,015,000		48,015,000


Total Fixed-Rate Mortgage Notes Payable:					253,372,911		255,111,173	Total Fixed-Rate Mortgage Notes Payable:						252,117,127		252,761,651


Variable-Rate Line of Credit:	12/29/06	12/29/09⁽³⁾	LIBOR + 1.9%		31,800,000		11,500,000		12/29/06	12/29/10		LIBOR + 1.9%		34,900,000		33,200,000


Variable-Rate Short-Term Loan:	12/21/07	06/20/09⁽⁴⁾	LIBOR + 2.75%		—		20,000,000


Total Mortgage Notes Payable, Line of Credit and Short-Term Loan				$	285,172,911	$	286,611,173	Total Mortgage Notes Payable, Line of Credit and Short-Term Loan					$	287,017,127	$	285,961,651

~~As long as the Company is in compliance with its covenants under the~~Company’s line of credit, the Company has the option to extend the line of credit for an additional year. The Company must notify KeyBank of its intention to exercise the renewal option 45 days prior to the maturity date and pay an extension fee of 0.20% of the total commitment outstanding at the date of notification.credit. The interest rate charged on the advances under the facility is based on the LIBOR, the prime rate or the federal funds rate, depending on market conditions, and adjusts periodically. The unused portion of the line of credit is subject to a fee of 0.15% per year. The Company’s ability to access this funding source is subject to the ~~Company continuing~~Company’s continued ability to meet customary lending requirements such as compliance with financial and operating covenants and ~~meeting~~satisfaction of certain lending limits. One such covenant requires the Company to limit its distributions to stockholders to 95% of its FFO less those ~~acquisition related~~acquisition-related costs that are required to be expensed under ASC 805. In addition, the maximum amount that the Company may draw under this agreement is based on a percentage of the value of properties pledged as collateral to the banks, which must meet agreed upon eligibility standards. ~~KeyBank has requested~~The maximum amount that the Company obtain updated appraisals for the properties pledged to the line of credit as borrowing base collateral in connection with the upcoming extension of the line of credit. If the aggregate value of the updated appraisals obtained is lower than the current aggregate value of appraisals, it would lower the amount of the Company’s borrowing base and reduce the amount the Company could borrow under its line of credit with that borrowing base. The Company ismay currently obtaining updated appraisals on its pledged properties, and does not believe that any change in the value of the properties will be significant enough to trigger a scenario whereby the Company would have to repay amounts currently outstanding under its line of credit; however, the receipt of updated appraisals may serve to reduce the current and future borrowing availability under the line of credit. In addition,draw under the Credit Agreement is approximately $45.1 million. Furthermore, those properties that are pledged as collateral to the banks are pledged through a perfected first priority lien in the equity interest of the special purpose entity (“SPE”) that owns the property. In addition the Operating Partnership, which is the entity that owns the SPEs, is precluded from transferring the SPEs or unconsolidated affiliates to the Company.

million outstanding pursuant to letters of credit at a weighted average interest rate of approximately 2.0%. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the remaining borrowing capacity available under the line of credit was approximately ~~$14.6~~$6.6 million. The Company’s ability to increase the availability under its line of credit is dependent upon its pledging additional properties as collateral. Traditionally, the Company has pledged new properties to its line of credit as it arranges for long-term mortgages for these pledged properties. Currently, only nine of the Company’s properties do not have long-term mortgages, and eight of those are pledged as collateral under its line of credit. Accordingly, the Company only has only one property which is unencumbered. The Company was in compliance with all covenants under the ~~line of credit~~Credit Agreement as of ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. The amount outstanding on the line of credit as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 approximates fair market value, because the debt is short-term and variable rate.

~~Short-Term Loan~~

OnThe Company’s line of credit matures in December ~~21, 2007,~~2010, and it is actively seeking to negotiate a renewal of the line of credit or to find replacement financing, though its ability to obtain replacement financing at the time of maturity could be constrained by current economic conditions affecting the credit markets generally. Consequently, no assurance can be given that we will be successful in renewing or replacing the line of credit with terms similar to the Company’s existing line of credit or at all. In the event that the Company ~~entered into~~is not able to obtain replacement financing for its credit facility on favorable terms, or at all, this could have a ~~$20.0 million unsecured short-term loan with KeyBank, which matured~~material adverse effect on ~~December 21, 2008. The Company exercised~~the Company’s liquidity, its ~~option~~ability to ~~extend~~make distributions to its stockholders and its ability to fund new investments. In the ~~term for an additional six months~~interim, in order to maintain sufficient liquidity and ~~on March 31, 2009,~~capital resources, the Company repaid in full the unsecured short-term loan, using proceeds from borrowings under its line of credit. The interest rate charged on the loan was based on the LIBOR, the prime rate or the federal funds rate, depending on market conditions,has and ~~adjusted periodically.~~will continue to evaluate all available financing options.

8. Stockholders’ Equity

The following table summarizes the changes in stockholders’ equity for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009:~~March 31, 2010:

Notes Distributions in
Capital in Receivable Excess of Total
Preferred Common Excess of From Sale of Accumulated Stockholders’
Stock Stock Par Value Common Stock Earnings Equity
Balance at December 31, 2008 $ 2,150 $ 8,563 $ 170,622,581 $ (2,595,886 ) $ (37,542,148 ) $ 130,495,260

Repayment of principal on notes receivable - employees — — — 44,285 — 44,285
Distributions declared to common and preferred stockholders — — — — (12,703,991 ) (12,703,991 )
Net income — — — — 3,485,506 3,485,506

Balance at September 30, 2009 $ 2,150 $ 8,563 $ 170,622,581 $ (2,551,601 ) $ (46,760,633 ) $ 121,321,060


									Notes			Distributions in
						Capital in			Receivable			Excess of			Total
	Preferred		Common			Excess of			From Sale of			Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Stock		Stock			Par Value			Common Stock			Earnings			Equity


Balance at December 31, 2009	$	2,150	$	8,563		$	170,622,581		$	(2,304,999	)	$	(49,877,753	)	$	118,450,542

Repayment of Principal on Notes Receivable		-		-			-			43,444			-			43,444

Distributions Declared to Common and Preferred Stockholders		-		-			-			-			(4,232,411	)		(4,232,411	)

Forfeiture of common stock in satisfaction of employee note receivable⁽¹⁾		-		(18	)		(243,882	)		-			-			(243,900	)

Net income		-		-			-			-			1,086,333			1,086,333


Balance at March 31, 2010	$	2,150	$	8,545		$	170,378,699		$	(2,261,555	)	$	(53,023,831	)	$	115,104,008

Distributions paid per common share for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $0.375 and $1.125 per share, respectively. Distributions paid per share of Series A Preferred Stock for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $0.48 and $1.45 per share, respectively. Distributions paid per share of Series B Preferred Stock for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were approximately $0.47 and $1.41 per share, respectively.


⁽¹⁾		On February 1, 2010, the maturity date of an employee stock option loan to a former employee of the Adviser was extended until August 2010. In connection with the extension of the loan, the recourse provision of the loan was removed and the former employee was granted the option to either repay the principal and interest in full or return the 18,000 shares pledged against the loan to the Company in full satisfaction of the loan. On March 8, 2010, the date that the market price of the pledged shares equaled the balance of the outstanding loan, the pledged shares were returned to the Company and the loan was deemed paid in full.

The following table is a summary of all outstanding notes issued to employees of the Adviser for the exercise of stock options:

1918


																			Outstanding
					Amount of		Outstanding Balance						Number of		Strike Price of		Amount of		Balance of		Outstanding Balance
	Number of Options		Strike Price of		Promissory Note		of Employee Loans		Maturity Date of	Interest Rate on			Options		Options		Promissory Note		Employee Loans		of Employee Loans at		Maturity Date	Interest Rate
Date Issued	Exercised		Options Exercised		Issued to Employees		at 9/30/09		Note	Note			Exercised		Exercised		Issued to Employees		at March 31, 2010		December 31, 2009		of Note	on Note

Sep 2004		25,000	$	15.00	$	375,000	$	360,007	Sep 2013		5.00	%		25,000	$	15.00	$	375,000	$	314,961	$	358,405	Sep 2013		5.00%
Apr 2006		12,422		16.10		199,994		199,994	Apr 2015		7.77	%		12,422		16.10		199,994		199,994		199,994	Apr 2015		7.77%
May 2006		50,000		16.85		842,500		842,500	May 2016		7.87	%		50,000		16.85		842,500		842,500		842,500	May 2016		7.87%
May 2006		15,000		16.10		241,500		241,500	May 2016		7.87	%		15,000		16.10		241,500		241,500		241,500	May 2016		7.87%
May 2006		2,000		16.10		32,200		32,200	May 2016		7.87	%		2,000		16.10		32,200		32,200		32,200	May 2016		7.87%
May 2006		2,000		16.10		32,200		32,200	May 2016		7.87	%		2,000		16.10		32,200		32,200		32,200	May 2016		7.87%
May 2006		2,000		15.00		30,000		30,000	May 2016		7.87	%		2,000		15.00		30,000		30,000		30,000	May 2016		7.87%
Oct 2006		12,000		16.10		193,200		193,200	Oct 2015		8.17	%		12,000		16.10		193,200		193,200		193,200	Oct 2015		8.17%
Nov 2006		25,000		15.00		375,000		375,000	Nov 2015		8.15	%		25,000		15.00		375,000		375,000		375,000	Nov 2015		8.15%
Dec 2006		25,000		15.00		375,000		245,000	Feb 2010		8.12	%


		170,422			$	2,696,594	$	2,551,601						145,422			$	2,321,594	$	2,261,555	$	2,304,999

As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2009 As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate
Leasing Lending Other Total Leasing Lending Other Total
Operating revenues $ 10,465,427 $ 191,667 $ — $ 10,657,094 $ 31,398,016 $ 568,750 $ — $ 31,966,766
Operating expenses (3,540,320 ) — (1,528,698 )⁽¹⁾ (5,069,018 ) (10,685,159 ) — (4,730,744 )⁽¹⁾ (15,415,903 )
Other expense (4,146,341 ) — (326,853 )⁽²⁾ (4,473,194 ) (12,343,000 ) — (925,218 )⁽²⁾ (13,268,218 )
Discontinued operations 164,108 — — 164,108 202,861 — — 202,861

Net income $ 2,942,874 $ 191,667 $ (1,855,551 ) $ 1,278,990 $ 8,572,718 $ 568,750 $ (5,655,962 ) $ 3,485,506

Total Assets $ 398,456,908 $ 10,062,500 $ 9,762,275 $ 418,281,683 $ 398,456,908 $ 10,062,500 $ 9,762,275 $ 418,281,683

2009:


																							As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2010
	As of and for the three months ended September 30, 2008											As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2008											Real Estate			Real Estate
	Real Estate			Real Estate								Real Estate			Real Estate								Leasing			Lending		Other				Total
	Leasing			Lending		Other			Total			Leasing			Lending		Other			Total
Operating revenues	$	10,214,822		$	216,446	$	—		$	10,431,268		$	29,444,905		$	673,548	$	—		$	30,118,453		$	10,497,476		$	187,500	$	-			$	10,684,976
Operating expenses		(3,516,118	)		—		(1,498,484	)⁽¹⁾		(5,014,602	)		(10,183,248	)		—		(4,301,914	)⁽¹⁾		(14,485,162	)		(3,625,348	)		-		(1,735,038	)	⁽¹⁾		(5,360,386	)
Other expense		(3,426,160	)		—		(866,538	)⁽²⁾		(4,292,698	)		(9,593,917	)		—		(2,283,059	)⁽²⁾		(11,876,976	)		(4,045,644	)		-		(192,613	)	⁽²⁾		(4,238,257	)

Discontinued operations		17,591			—		—			17,591			21,392			—		—			21,392			-			-		-				-

Net income	$	3,290,135		$	216,446	$	(2,365,022	)	$	1,141,559		$	9,689,132		$	673,548	$	(6,584,973	)	$	3,777,707		$	2,826,484		$	187,500	$	(1,927,651	)		$	1,086,333



Total Assets	$	409,461,178		$	10,070,714	$	10,751,163		$	430,283,055		$	409,461,178		$	10,070,714	$	10,751,163		$	430,283,055		$	396,795,468		$	10,064,583	$	7,760,049			$	414,620,100


~~Item 2.~~		~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

All statements contained herein, other than historical facts, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements may relate to, among other things, future events or our future performance or financial condition. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “might,” “believe,” “will,” “provided,” “anticipate,” “future,” “could,” “growth,” “plan,” “intend,” “expect,” “should,” “would,” “if,” “seek,” “possible,” “potential,” “likely” or the negative of such terms or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and, as such, speak only as of the date made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

All references to “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company” in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Report”) mean Gladstone Commercial Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries, except where it is made clear that the term means only Gladstone Commercial Corporation.

OVERVIEW

General

We were incorporated under the General Corporation ~~Laws~~Law of the State of Maryland on February 14, 2003, primarily for the purpose of investing in and owning net leased industrial and commercial real property and selectively making long-term industrial and commercial mortgage loans. Most of the portfolio of real estate that we currently own is leased to a wide cross section of tenants ranging from small businesses to large public companies, many of which are corporations that do not have publicly rated debt. We have ~~in the past~~historically entered into, and intend in the future to enter into, purchase agreements for real estate having triple net leases with terms of approximately 10 to 15 years and built in rental rate increases. Under a triple net lease, the tenant is required to pay all operating, maintenance and insurance costs and real estate taxes with respect to the leased property. We are actively communicating with buyout funds, real estate brokers and other third parties to locate properties for potential acquisition or to provide mortgage financing in an effort to build our portfolio. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, we owned 64 properties totaling approximately 6.3 million square feet, and had one mortgage loan outstanding. The total gross investment in these acquisitions, including the $10.0 million mortgage loan investment, was approximately ~~$442.7~~$444.2 million at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

Business Environment

The United States ~~remains~~is beginning to recover from the recession that it entered into during late 2007 though it continues to experience pervasive and fundamental disruptions in ~~a recession, and, as~~its financial markets. As a result, conditions within the ~~global~~U.S. credit markets generally and the U.S. real estate credit markets, in particular, continue to experience significant dislocation and stress. While we are beginning to see signs of economic ~~improvementand~~improvement and stabilization in both the equity and debt capital markets, ~~the debt~~these markets ~~are still difficult at best,~~remain challenging, and we do not know if adverse conditions will again intensify, ornor are we able to gauge the full extent to which the disruptions will affect us. ~~In addition,~~Additionally, economic conditions continue to ~~make it difficult~~disrupt our ability to price and finance new investment opportunities on attractive terms. We believe that it will betake some time ~~before~~for the United States ~~has recovered~~to fully recover from the ~~recession, and as~~recession. As a result, the continued weak economic conditions could still adversely impact the financial condition of one or more of our tenants, and therefore, could make a tenant bankruptcy and payment default on the related lease or loan more likely.

Currently, all of our properties are fully leased, and all of our tenants and our borrower are current and paying in accordance with their leases and loan, ~~respectively.~~respectively; however, we have three leases that expire in 2010, which comprise approximately 3.4% of our total annualized rental income. Two of these tenants have notified us that they will not renew their leases, and we are currently both seeking new tenants for and researching alternative uses for these properties. In addition, nowe have $48.0 million of balloon principal payments ~~are due~~maturing under one of our ~~mortgage notes payable until 2010, and~~long-term mortgages in 2010; however, the ~~only~~ mortgage ~~note that matures in 2010~~ has three annual extension options through 2013, which we currently intend to exercise. We have no other balloon principal payments due under any of our mortgages until 2013.

Our ability to make new investments is highly dependent upon our ability to procure external financing. Our principal sources of external financing ~~sources~~ generally include the issuance of equity securities, ~~the issuance of~~ long-term mortgages secured by properties, and borrowings under our line of credit. The market for long-term mortgages ~~continues to be frozen~~remains at a standstill, as the collateralized mortgage-backed securities, or CMBS, market has virtually

disappeared. With the closure of the CMBS market, many banks are not lending on commercial real estate as they are no longer able to sell these loans to the CMBS market and are not willing or able to keep these loans on their balance sheets. In addition, many banks have significantly curtailed their general lending practices, as they are having difficulty valuing the underlying real estate in this market. We are now only seeing banks ~~only~~ willing to issue medium-term mortgages, between two toand five years, aton substantially less favorable ~~terms. As a result,~~terms than were previously available. Consequently, we intend to focus on using medium-term mortgages to finance our real estate until the market for long-term mortgages returns. Our ability to increase the availability under our line of credit is dependent upon usour pledging additional properties as collateral. Traditionally, we have pledged new properties to the line of credit as we arrange for long-term mortgages for these pledged properties. Currently, only nine of our properties do not have long-term mortgages, and eight of those are pledged as collateral under our line of credit. Our line of credit matures in December ~~2009, however,~~2010, and we ~~intend~~are actively seeking to ~~exercise~~negotiate a renewal of the line of credit or find replacement financing this year. We are anticipating that the terms under a renewal or replacement line of credit will be less favorable then the terms under our ~~option to extend the term for an additional year, through December 2010.~~current line of credit.

On November 4, 2009, we entered into an Open Market Sale Agreement (the “Open Market Sale Agreement”) with Jefferies & Company, Inc. (“Jefferies”) under which we may, from time to time, offer and sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $25.0 million through Jefferies, or to Jefferies, for resale. To date, we have not sold any common stock under the Open Market Sale Agreemennt.IfIf we are able to raise additional equity capital in the near term, ~~in addition to continuing~~we will continue to invest in industrial and commercial real property ~~we will also seek to~~as well as expand our ~~investments~~investment portfolio in to other ~~categories~~real property sectors, such as retail and medical properties. ~~In addition,~~Furthermore, we ~~also~~ intend to expand our mortgage lending activity to include purchasing mortgage loans from banks and CMBS ~~pools.~~

~~However,~~pools, however, until we are able to raise debt or additional equity capital, our near-term strategy ~~has become somewhat dependent~~is contingent upon building the value of our existing portfolio of properties by renegotiating existing leases and making capital improvements to our properties. Capital improvements, however, will be limited to the extent we have available capital. We will continue to ~~review~~actively seek potential acquisitions, and we ~~intend to~~will continue our strategy of making conservative investments in properties that have existing financing ~~that we believe will weather~~sufficient to withstand the current ~~recession~~economic conditions, and that are likely to produce attractive long-term returns for our stockholders.

Recent Events

Financing Activities:

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, we had net borrowings under our line of credit of approximately ~~$20.3~~$1.7 million, with ~~$31.8~~$34.9 million outstanding at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. The proceeds from borrowings under the line of credit were used for working capital and to ~~pay off the $20.0 million unsecured short-term loan with KeyBank and~~ fund ~~other~~ capital improvements at certain of our properties.

Equity Activities:

On November 4, 2009, we entered into an open market sale agreement, or the Open Market Sale Agreement, with Jefferies & Company, Inc., or Jefferies, under which we may, from time to time, offer ~~and~~to sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $25.0 million ~~through Jefferies, or to Jefferies, for resale.~~

~~Leasing Activities:~~

~~On May 5, 2009, we extended~~on the lease with one of our tenants in our property located in Akron, Ohio for a period of six months. The lease was originally set to expire in August 2009, and will now expire in February 2010. Except for the extension of the lease term, all other existing provisions of the lease, including the current rental rate, will remain the same during the extension period.

On May 19, 2009, we extended the lease on our property located in Eatontown, New Jersey for a period of 15 years, and the tenant has two options to extend the lease for additional periods of 5 years each. The lease was originally set to expire in August 2011, and will now expire in April 2024. The lease provides for prescribed rent escalations over the life of the lease, with annualized straight line rents of approximately $540,000.open market

~~Dispositions:~~through Jefferies, as agent, or to Jefferies, as principal. To date, we have not sold any common stock under the Open Market Sale Agreement.

On ~~July 17,~~November 19, 2009, we ~~sold~~entered into a dealer manager agreement, or the Dealer Manager Agreement, with Halcyon Capital Markets, LLC, or Halcyon, pursuant to which Halcyon will act as our ~~property located~~dealer manager in ~~Norfolk, Virginia for $1.15 million, for a gain on~~connection with our continuous private offering of up to 3,333,333 shares of our newly designated senior common stock at $15.00 per share. On April 29, 2010, we issued 2,060 shares of senior common stock in our first closing of the ~~sale of approximately $160,000. The~~private offering. Net proceeds from the sale, after selling commissions and the dealer manager fee, were $27,675. The net proceeds from the sale of the senior common stock will be used for investment in additional properties and mortgage loans, to ~~pay down~~repay indebtedness, to potentially purchase shares of our ~~line of credit.~~preferred stock on the open market, or other general corporate purposes.

Industry Classifications

Gladstone Management Corporation, or our Adviser, seeks to diversify our portfolio to avoid dependence on any one particular tenant, geographic ~~location~~market or tenant industry. By diversifying our portfolio, our Adviser intends to reduce the adverse effect on our portfolio of a single under-performing investment or a downturn in any particular industry or geographic ~~region.~~market. Our largest tenant at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 comprised approximately 7.3% of our total rental income, and our largest concentration of properties was located in Ohio, which accounted for approximately ~~17.7%~~17.9% of our total rental income. The table below reflects the breakdown of our total rental income by tenant industry classification for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008,~~ respectively:


	September 30, 2009					September 30, 2008					March 31, 2010					March 31, 2009
			Percentage of					Percentage of					Percentage of					Percentage of
Industry Classification	Rental Income		Rental Income			Rental Income		Rental Income			Rental Income		Rental Income			Rental Income		Rental Income
Automobile	$	874,990		2.8	%	$	874,990		3.0	%	$	291,663		2.8	%	$	291,663		2.8	%
Beverage, Food & Tobacco		1,641,563		5.3	%		1,534,622		5.3	%		547,192		5.2	%		547,180		5.3	%
Buildings and Real Estate		1,519,251		4.9	%		1,507,099		5.2	%		506,417		4.9	%		506,417		4.9	%
Chemicals, Plastics & Rubber		2,395,845		7.7	%		1,655,620		5.7	%		782,534		7.5	%		802,204		7.7	%
Containers, Packaging & Glass		1,747,626		5.6	%		1,706,406		5.8	%		582,619		5.6	%		582,503		5.6	%
Diversified/Conglomerate Manufacturing		2,748,515		8.8	%		2,249,576		7.7	%		916,172		8.8	%		916,172		8.8	%
Diversified/Conglomerate Services		231,079		0.7	%		231,079		0.8	%		77,026		0.7	%		77,026		0.8	%
Electronics		4,624,341		14.8	%		4,624,341		15.8	%		1,541,448		14.8	%		1,541,447		14.9	%
Healthcare, Education & Childcare		4,609,061		14.8	%		4,182,663		14.3	%		1,536,353		14.8	%		1,536,353		14.8	%
Home & Office Furnishings		397,307		1.3	%		397,307		1.4	%		132,436		1.3	%		132,436		1.3	%
Insurance		542,150		1.7	%		542,150		1.9	%		180,717		1.7	%		180,717		1.7	%
Machinery		1,791,453		5.8	%		1,644,601		5.6	%		597,155		5.7	%		597,151		5.7	%
Oil & Gas		855,391		2.7	%		864,332		3.0	%		329,391		3.2	%		288,111		2.8	%
Personal & Non-Durable Consumer Products		1,016,041		3.3	%		1,016,380		3.5	%		338,681		3.2	%		338,680		3.3	%
Personal, Food & Miscellaneous Services		431,255		1.4	%		431,255		1.5	%		143,752		1.4	%		143,752		1.4	%
Printing & Publishing		1,639,363		5.3	%		1,644,212		5.6	%		549,669		5.3	%		544,845		5.3	%
Telecommunications		4,085,192		13.1	%		4,084,777		13.8	%		1,361,841		13.1	%		1,361,587		12.9	%

	$	31,150,423		100.0	%	$	29,191,410		100.0	%	$	10,415,066		100.0	%	$	10,388,244		100.0	%

Advisory and Administration Agreements

We are externally managed pursuant to contractual arrangements with our Adviser and our ~~Administrator, under which our~~Administrator. Our Adviser and Administrator ~~have directly employed~~employ all of our personnel and ~~paid~~pay their payroll, benefits, and general expenses directly. On January 1, 2007, we entered into an advisory agreement with our Adviser, which we refer to as the Advisory Agreement, and an administration agreement with our Administrator, which we refer to as the Administration Agreement.

Under the terms of the Advisory Agreement, we are responsible for all expenses incurred for our direct benefit. Examples of these expenses include legal, accounting, interest on short-term debt and mortgages, tax preparation, ~~directors~~directors’ and ~~officers~~officers’ insurance, stock transfer services, ~~stockholder related~~stockholder-related fees, consulting and related fees.

In addition, we are also responsible for all fees charged by third parties that are directly related to our business, which may include real estate brokerage fees, mortgage placement fees, lease-up fees and transaction structuring fees (although we may be able to pass some or all of such fees on to our tenants and borrowers).

During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008,~~ none of these expenses were incurred by us directly. The actual amount of such fees that we incur in the future will depend largely upon the aggregate costs of the properties that we acquire, the aggregate amount of mortgage loans that we make and the extent to which we are able to shift the burden of such fees to our tenants and borrowers. Accordingly, the amount of these fees that we will pay in the future is not determinable at this time.

Management Services and Fees under the Advisory Agreement

The Advisory Agreement provides for an annual base management fee equal to 2.0% of our total stockholders’ equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock, and for an incentive fee based on funds from operations, or FFO. Our Adviser does not charge acquisition or disposition fees when we acquire or dispose of properties as is common with other externally-advised REITs. Furthermore, there are no fees charged when our Adviser secures long or short-term credit or arranges mortgage loans on our properties.

For purposes of calculating the incentive fee, FFO includes any realized capital gains and capital losses, less any distributions paid on preferred stock, but FFO does not include any unrealized capital gains or losses. The incentive fee would reward our Adviser if our quarterly FFO, before giving effect to any incentive fee, or pre-incentive fee FFO, exceeds 1.75%, or the hurdle rate, of total stockholders’ equity, less the recorded value of any preferred stock. We pay our Adviser an incentive fee with respect to our pre-incentive fee FFO in each calendar quarter as follows:

	•		no incentive fee in any calendar quarter in which our pre-incentive fee FFO does not exceed the hurdle rate of 1.75% (7% annualized);

	•		100% of the amount of the pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds the hurdle rate, but is less than 2.1875% in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized); and

	•		20% of the amount of our pre-incentive fee FFO that exceeds 2.1875% in any calendar quarter (8.75% annualized).

Quarterly Incentive Fee Based on FFO

Pre-incentive fee FFO
(expressed as a percentage of total common stockholders’ equity)

Percentage of pre-incentive fee FFO allocated to incentive fee

The incentive fee may be reduced because of a covenant which exists in our line of credit ~~covenant~~agreement which limits distributions to our stockholders to 95% of FFO. In order to comply with this covenant, our board of directors accepted our Adviser’s offer to unconditionally, irrevocably and voluntarily waive on a quarterly basis a portion of the incentive fee for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009, ~~and 2008,~~ which allowed us to maintain the current level of distributions to our stockholders. These ~~waivers were applied through September 30, 2009 and any~~ waived fees may not be recouped by our Adviser in the future. There was no waiver to the incentive fee for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Our Adviser has indicated that it intends to continue to waive all or a portion of the incentive fee in order to support the current level of distributions to our ~~stockholders,~~stockholders; however, our Adviser is not required to issue any waiver, in whole or in part.

Administration Agreement

Under the Administration Agreement, we pay ~~separately~~ for our allocable portion of our Administrator’s overhead expenses inincurred while performing its obligations including, but not limited to, rent for employees of our Administrator, and our allocable portion of the salaries and benefits expenses of our chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, internal counsel, treasurer, investor relations and their respective staffs. Our allocable portion of expenses is derived by multiplying our Administrator’s total expenses by the percentage of our total assets at the beginning of each quarter in comparison to the total assets of all companies managed by our Adviser under similar agreements.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, or GAAP, requires ~~management~~Management to make judgments that are subjective in nature in order to make certain estimates and assumptions. Management relies on its experience, collects historical data and current market data, and analyzes this information in order to arrive at what it believes to be reasonable estimates. Under different conditions or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported related to the accounting policies described below. In addition, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment onregarding the use of assumptions as to future uncertainties, and as a result, actual results could materially differ from these estimates. A summary of all of our significant accounting policies is provided in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. Below is a summary of accounting polices involving estimates and assumptions that require complex, subjective or significant judgments in their application and that materially affect our results of operations.

Allocation of Purchase Price

When we acquire real estate, we allocate the purchase price, less any expenses related to the acquisition, to (i) the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land, building, tenant improvements, long-term debt and (ii) the identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases,

values. All expenses related to the acquisition are expensed as incurred, rather than capitalized into the cost of the acquisition as had been the previous accounting.

Management’s estimates of value are made using methods similar to those used by independent appraisers (e.g., discounted cash flow analysis). Factors considered by ~~management~~Management in its analysis include an estimate of carrying costs during hypothetical expected lease-up periods considering current market conditions and costs to execute similar leases. We also consider information obtained about each property as a result of our pre-acquisition due diligence, marketing and leasing activities in estimating the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets and liabilities acquired. In estimating carrying costs, ~~management~~Management also includes real estate taxes, insurance and other operating expenses and estimates of lost rentals at market rates during the hypothetical expected lease-up periods, which primarily range from 9 to 18 months, depending on specific local market conditions. Management also estimates costs to execute similar leases, including leasing commissions, legal and other related expenses to the extent that such costs are not already incurred in connection with a new lease origination as part of the transaction. Management also considers the nature and extent of our existing business relationships with the tenant, growth prospects for developing new business with the tenant, the tenant’s credit quality and Management’s expectations of lease renewals (including those existing under the terms of the lease agreement), among other factors. A change in any of the assumptions above, which are very subjective, could have a material impact on our results of operations.

The allocation of the purchase price directly affects the following in our consolidated financial statements:

	•		The amount of purchase price allocated to the various tangible and intangible assets on our balance sheet;

	•		The amounts allocated to the value of above-market and below-market lease values are amortized to rental income over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases. The amounts allocated to all other tangible and intangible assets are amortized to depreciation or amortization expense. Thus, depending on the amounts allocated between land and other depreciable assets, changes in the purchase price allocation among our assets could have a material impact on our FFO, which is used by many REIT investors to evaluate our operating performance; and

	•		The period of time ~~that~~over which tangible and intangible assets are depreciated ~~over~~ varies greatly, and thus, changes in the amounts allocated to these assets will have a direct impact on our results of operations. Intangible assets are generally amortized over the respective life of the leases, which normally range from 10 to 15 ~~years,~~years. Also, we depreciate our buildings over 39 years, ~~and land is~~but do not ~~depreciated.~~depreciate our land. These differences in timing could have a material impact on our results of operations.

Asset Impairment Evaluation

We periodically review the carrying value of each property to determine if circumstances that indicate impairment in the carrying value of the investment exist or that depreciation periods should be modified. In determining if impairment exists, ~~management~~Management considers such factors as our tenants’ payment history, the financial condition of our tenants, including calculating the current leverage ratios of tenants, the likelihood of lease renewal, business conditions in the industry in which our tenants operate and whether the carrying value of our real estate has decreased. If any of the factors above support the possibility of impairment, we prepare a projection of the undiscounted future cash flows, without interest charges, of the specific property and determine if the carrying amount in such property is recoverable. In preparing the projection of undiscounted future cash flows, we estimate the hold periods of the properties and cap rates using information that we obtain from market comparability studies and other comparable sources. If impairment is indicated, the carrying value of the property would be written down to its estimated fair value based on our best estimate of the property’s discounted future cash flows using assumptions or market participants. Any material changes to the estimates and assumptions used in this analysis could have a significant impact on our results of operations, as the changes would impact our determination of whether impairment is deemed to have occurred and the amount of impairment loss that we would recognize.

Using the methodology discussed above and in light of the current economic conditions discussed above in “Overview-Business Environment,” we performed an impairment analysis of our entire portfolio at ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. We concluded that none of our properties are currently impaired, and we will continue to monitor our portfolio for any indicators that may change our conclusion.

Provision for Loan Losses

Our accounting policies require that we reflect in our financial statements an allowance for estimated credit losses with respect to mortgage loans that we have made based upon our evaluation of known and inherent risks associated with our private lending assets. Management reflects provisions for loan losses based upon our assessment of general market conditions, our internal risk management policies and credit risk rating system, industry loss experience, our assessment of the likelihood of delinquencies or defaults, and the value of the collateral underlying our investments. Any material changes to the estimates and assumptions used in this analysis could have a significant impact on our results of operations. We did not make a loss allowance for our existing mortgage loan receivable as of ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as we believe the carrying value of the loan is fully ~~collectible.~~collectable.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Refer to Note 1 in the accompanying consolidated financial statements for a summary of all recently issued accounting pronouncements.

Results of Operations

Our weighted-average yield on ~~the~~our portfolio as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 was approximately 9.57%. The weighted-average yield on our portfolio is calculated by taking the annualized straight-line rents, reflected as rental income on our consolidated statements of operations, or mortgage interest payments, reflected as interest income from mortgage notes receivable on our consolidated statements of operations, of each acquisition or mortgage loan as a percentage of the acquisition or loan price, as applicable. The weighted-average yield does not ~~take into~~ account for the interest expense incurred on the ~~financings~~mortgages placed on our properties.

A comparison of our operating results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ is below:


	For the three months ended September 30,												For the nine months ended September 30,
										%															For the three months ended March 31,
	2009			2008			$ Change			Change			2009			2008			$ Change			% Change			2010			2009			$ Change			% Change
Operating revenues
Rental income	$	10,383,002		$	10,131,678		$	251,324			2	%	$	31,150,423		$	29,191,410		$	1,959,013			7	%	$	10,415,066		$	10,388,244		$	26,822			0	%
Interest income from mortgage notes receivable		191,667			216,446			(24,779	)		-11	%		568,750			673,548			(104,798	)		-16	%		187,500			187,500			-			0	%
Tenant recovery revenue		82,425			83,144			(719	)		-1	%		247,593			253,495			(5,902	)		-2	%		82,410			82,432			(22	)		0	%

Total operating revenues		10,657,094			10,431,268			225,826			2	%		31,966,766			30,118,453			1,848,313			6	%		10,684,976			10,658,176			26,800			0	%


Operating expenses
Depreciation and amortization		3,284,723			3,256,602			28,121			1	%		9,875,156			9,416,786			458,370			5	%		3,321,871			3,307,802			14,069			0	%
Property operating expenses		219,537			222,647			(3,110	)		-1	%		687,129			665,103			22,026			3	%		244,354			236,812			7,542			3	%
Due diligence expense		—			2,158			(2,158	)		-100	%		16,433			4,282			12,151			284	%		21,876			9,547			12,329			129	%
Base management fee		342,743			404,108			(61,365	)		-15	%		1,073,041			1,255,833			(182,792	)		-15	%		312,564			372,648			(60,084	)		-16	%
Incentive fee		835,003			793,787			41,216			5	%		2,433,945			2,300,286			133,659			6	%		846,192			786,289			59,903			8	%
Administration fee		293,075			238,241			54,834			23	%		774,636			724,978			49,658			7	%		231,884			224,354			7,530			3	%
Professional fees		105,368			117,857			(12,489	)		-11	%		466,529			362,584			103,945			29	%		175,610			235,198			(59,588	)		-25	%
Insurance		50,757			43,354			7,403			17	%		147,561			126,947			20,614			16	%
Directors fees		49,459			54,702			(5,243	)		-10	%		149,547			161,202			(11,655	)		-7	%
Stockholder related expense		32,914			42,232			(9,318	)		-22	%		204,806			271,430			(66,624	)		-25	%
Insurance expense																										56,325			48,678			7,647			16	%
Directors’ fees																										49,418			49,702			(284	)		-1	%
Stockholder-related expense																										45,216			83,647			(38,431	)		-46	%
Asset retirement obligation expense		36,060			34,711			1,349			4	%		106,441			97,077			9,364			10	%		37,247			34,907			2,340			7	%
General and administrative		19,643			10,079			9,564			95	%		45,647			40,582			5,065			12	%
General and administrative expenses																										17,829			10,549			7,280			69	%

Total operating expenses before credit from Adviser		5,269,282			5,220,478			48,804			1	%		15,980,871			15,427,090			553,781			4	%		5,360,386			5,400,133			(39,747	)		-1	%


Credit to incentive fee		(200,264	)		(205,876	)		5,612			-3	%		(564,968	)		(941,928	)		376,960			-40	%		-			(235,081	)		235,081			-100	%

Total operating expenses		5,069,018			5,014,602			54,416			1	%		15,415,903			14,485,162			930,741			6	%		5,360,386			5,165,052			195,334			4	%


Other income (expense)
Interest income from temporary investments		524			4,559			(4,035	)		-89	%		17,989			20,796			(2,807	)		-13	%		265			17,281			(17,016	)		-98	%
Interest income — employee loans		48,130			49,624			(1,494	)		-3	%		145,878			152,620			(6,742	)		-4	%
Interest income - employee loans																										43,101			48,886			(5,785	)		-12	%
Other income		—			7,500			(7,500	)		-100	%		11,320			56,493			(45,173	)		-80	%		3,316			-			3,316			100	%
Interest expense		(4,521,848	)		(4,354,381	)		(167,467	)		4	%		(13,443,405	)		(12,106,885	)		(1,336,520	)		11	%		(4,284,939	)		(4,487,560	)		202,621			-5	%

Total other expense		(4,473,194	)		(4,292,698	)		(180,496	)		4	%		(13,268,218	)		(11,876,976	)		(1,391,242	)		12	%		(4,238,257	)		(4,421,393	)		183,136			-4	%


Income from continuing operations		1,114,882			1,123,968			(9,086	)		-1	%		3,282,645			3,756,315			(473,670	)		-13	%		1,086,333			1,071,731			14,602			1	%


Discontinued operations
Income from discontinued operations		4,070			17,591			(13,521	)		-77	%		42,823			21,392			21,431			100	%		-			17,838			(17,838	)		-100	%
Gain on sale of real estate		160,038			—			160,038			100	%		160,038			—			160,038			100	%

Total discontinued operations		164,108			17,591			146,517			833	%		202,861			21,392			181,469			848	%		-			17,838			(17,838	)		-100	%


Net income		1,278,990			1,141,559			137,431			12	%		3,485,506			3,777,707			(292,201	)		-8	%		1,086,333			1,089,569			(3,236	)		0	%


Distributions attributable to preferred stock		(1,023,437	)		(1,023,437	)		—			0	%		(3,070,312	)		(3,070,312	)		—			0	%		(1,023,438	)		(1,023,437	)		(1	)		0	%


Net income available to common stockholders	$	255,553		$	118,122		$	137,431			116	%	$	415,194		$	707,395		$	(292,201	)		-41	%	$	62,895		$	66,132		$	(3,237	)		-5	%

Operating Revenues

Rental income ~~increased~~remained flat for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of the~~March 31, 2009, because no properties have been acquired ~~during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 that were held for the full nine-month period in 2009.~~since 2008.

Interest income from mortgage notes receivable ~~decreased~~remained flat for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, primarily~~March 31, 2009, because interest income on our mortgage loan is calculated based on a floor rate of 7.5% per year or the one month London Interbank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, ~~which~~rate plus 6.0% per year, and has ~~significantly decreased~~a ceiling rate of 10.0%. LIBOR plus the 6.0% spread has remained below the floor rate of 7.5% over the past ~~year.~~year, resulting in interest remaining flat.

Tenant recovery revenue ~~decreased slightly~~remained flat for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, primarily as a result of a decrease in the insurance premiums on some of our~~March 31, 2009, because no properties ~~in which the tenants reimburse us for insurance expense.~~have been acquired since 2008.

Operating Expenses

Depreciation and amortization expenses ~~increased during~~remained flat for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, as a result of the~~March 31, 2009, because no properties have been acquired ~~during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 that were held for the full nine-month period in 2009.~~since 2008.

Property operating expenses consist of franchise taxes, management fees, insurance, ground lease payments and overhead expenses paid on behalf of certain of our properties. Property operating expenses remained relatively flat during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008, and increased slightly for the nine months ended September 30,~~March 31, 2009, ~~as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2008, primarily~~ because ~~of an increase in franchise taxes paid in certain states coupled with repairs and maintenance performed at certain of our properties.~~no properties have been acquired since 2008.

Due diligence expense primarily consists of legal fees and fees incurred for third-party reports prepared during our due diligence work. ~~There was no due diligence expense incurred for the three months ended September 30, 2009.~~ Due diligence expenses increased for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, primarily because of legal fees incurred in connection with a potential acquisition that did not close during the quarter. Total due ~~to the~~diligence expenses remain relatively low; however, with our adoption of Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC, 805 “Business Combinations,” on January 1, 2009, ~~discussed in detail in Note 1 of the accompanying consolidated financial statements,~~ which requires ~~us to~~that we no longer capitalize due diligence costs into the price of the ~~acquisition.~~acquisition, we expect that our due diligence expense will increase significantly once we begin to acquire properties again.

The base management fee decreased for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, as a result of a decrease in total common stockholders’ equity, the main component of the calculation. Total common stockholders’ equity decreased because distributions to common stockholders for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 exceeded net income during the period by approximately ~~$6.1~~$2.1 million. The calculation of the base management fee is described in detail above under“~~-Advisory~~Advisory and Administration Agreements.”

The incentive fee increased for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, due to the increase in pre-incentive fee FFO ascaused by a ~~result~~decrease in certain of our ~~increased rental income discussed above,~~operating expenses, coupled with the decrease in total common stockholders’ equity. The calculation of the incentive fee is described in detail above under“~~-Advisory~~Advisory and Administration Agreements.”

The administration fee increased slightly for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, primarily as a result of an increase in our total assets in comparison to the total assets of all companies managed by our Adviser under similar agreements, ~~coupled with~~which was partially offset by a decrease in the ~~costs incurred by~~amount of the total expenses allocated from our Administrator ~~which are directly allocable to us, for~~during the ~~implementation of real estate software.~~quarter. The calculation of the ~~administrative~~administration fee is described in detail above under “-“Advisory and Administration Agreements.”

with our existing tenants during the three months ended March 31, 2009 that were incurred to a lesser extent during the three months ended March 31, 2010, coupled with tax research ~~on state tax issues incurred~~fees paid during ~~2009.~~2009, which were not paid during 2010.

Insurance expense consists of the premiums paid for directors’ and officers’ insurance, which is renewed annually each September. Insurance expense increased for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, because of an increase in the premiums for the period from September ~~2008~~2009 through September ~~2009.~~2010.

Directors’ fees ~~decreased~~remained flat during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, primarily~~March 31, 2009, as ~~a result of one of~~we made no changes to the ~~independent~~compensation paid to our non-employee directors ~~becoming an interested director in January 2008, and thus not being paid an annual stipend during 2009.~~for 2010.

~~Stockholder related~~Stockholder-related expense decreased for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, primarily as a result of decreased costs associated with printing and filing our proxy ~~materials.~~materials and annual report.

Asset retirement obligation expense increased for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, primarily as a result~~March 31, 2009, because of ~~a property acquired in March 2008, which was required to recognize an asset retirement liability, coupled with~~ the increase in the accretion of the expense over the term of the lease including renewal periods.

General and administrative expenses increased for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, primarily as a result of an increase in the amount of travel for site visits to our properties, coupled with an increase in bank service charges.

Other Income and Expense

Interest income from temporary investments decreased during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008,~~March 31, 2009, primarily because of lower interest rates earned on our money market accounts, ~~partially offset by~~coupled with interest received induring the three months ended March 31, 2009 from funds held on deposit for a prospective real estate acquisition, coupled with interest earned on amounts held in reserve accounts with our lenders.

Interest income on employee loans decreased during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009. This decrease was a result of loan payoffs made by employees during ~~2008,~~2009 and other principal repayments during the first quarter of 2010, coupled with a stock option loan to a former employee of our Adviser whereby interest on her loan is now recorded in other ~~partial principal repayments over the periods.~~income. The loan was paid in full in March 2010.

Other income ~~decreased~~increased during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008, primarily~~March 31, 2009, because ~~we no longer receive management fees~~of income earned on a stock option loan to a former employee of our Adviser. In connection with that employee’s termination of employment with our Adviser and the later amendment of the loan, the interest on the loan from ~~our tenant~~the date of termination, November 2009, is included in ~~our Burnsville, Minnesota property.~~other income on the consolidated statement of operations. The loan was paid in full in March 2010.

Interest expense ~~increased~~decreased for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009. This was primarily a result of a decrease in LIBOR from the first quarter of 2009, which reduced our interest expense under our line of credit, coupled with reduced interest expense on our long-term financings ~~which closed during 2008, that were held for the full period~~from amortizing principal payments made during 2009.

Discontinued Operations

Income from discontinued operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009 primarily relates to the property that we sold in July 2009, which was located in Norfolk, Virginia, including a gain on the sale of the property of approximately $160,000. This is partially offset by continuing expenses related to the two Canadian properties, which we sold in July 2006. TheVirginia.

~~expenses for the two Canadian properties relate to legal fees associated with the dissolution of the entities, which sold the properties.~~

Net Income Available to Common Stockholders

Net income available to common stockholders ~~increased~~remained relatively flat for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, as compared to the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2008. This increase was primarily a result of~~March 31, 2009 as we had minimal activity during the gain on sale of our property in Norfolk, Virginia coupled with the growth of our portfolio of investments in the past year and the corresponding increase in our revenues and the other events described above. This increase was partially offset by increased interest expense from the increased number of properties which have long-term financing.periods.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Future Capital Needs

At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, we had approximately ~~$2.8~~$3.3 million in cash and cash equivalents. We have ~~access to our existing line of credit with~~ an available borrowing capacity of ~~$14.6~~$6.6 million under our line of credit, and have obtained mortgages on 55 of our properties. WeAs of March 31, 2010, we had investments in 64 real properties for a net carrying value, including intangible assets, of approximately ~~$386.9~~$381.8 million and one mortgage loan receivable for $10.0 million.

As discussed in “Overview-Business Environment”above, while there have been improvements in the U.S. economy, we continue to be impacted by weak ~~economic~~capital market conditions, which have affected our ability to obtain additional mortgages, as well as our ability to borrow funds and issue equity securities, our principal sources of external financing. Until economic conditions recover and stabilize, we intend to fund our existing contractual obligations with our cash flows from operations and ~~borrowing~~with borrowings made against our existing line of credit. If economic conditions continue to improve, we are hopeful that we will be able to issue additional equity securities under our effective shelf registration statement, ~~in order~~including pursuant to our Open Market Sale Agreement, and through a private offering of our senior common stock. If we are able to raise significant equity capital, we would intend to use the proceeds to acquire additional properties, make mortgage loans, ~~purchase~~repurchase shares of our preferred stock on the open market or pay down ~~borrowing~~outstanding borrowings under our line of credit. ~~The~~

Our existing shelf registration statement permits us to issue, through one or more transactions, up to an aggregate sale price of $300.0 million in securities consisting of common or preferred stock, ~~all~~ of which $25.0 million was ~~available~~reserved for sales under our Open Market Sale Agreement, discussed below, as of ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. On November 4, 2009, we entered into ~~the~~an Open Market Sale Agreement with Jefferies under which we may, from time to time, offer and sell shares of our common stock with an aggregate sales price of up to $25.0 million through Jefferies, as agent, or to ~~Jefferies for resale,~~Jeffries, as principal, based upon our instructions (including any price, time or size limits or other customary parameters or conditions that we may impose)... Sales of shares of our common stock through Jefferies, if any, will be executed by means of ordinary brokers’ transactions on the NASDAQ Global Select Market or otherwise at market prices, in privately negotiated transactions, crosses or block transactions as may be agreed between us and Jefferies, including a combination of any of these transactions. We will pay Jefferies a commission ~~or allow a discount, as the case may be, in each case~~ equal to 2.0% of the gross sales proceeds of any common stock sold through Jefferies as agent under the Open Market Sale Agreement. To date, we have not sold any shares of our common stock under the Open Market Sale Agreement, and there is no guarantee that we will sell any common stock under such agreement in the future.

In addition, on November 19, 2009, we entered into a dealer manager agreement with Halcyon who will act as ~~discussed~~our dealer manager in “~~Overview~~-~~Business Environment”~~~~above, as~~connection with our continuous private offering of up to 3,333,333 shares of our newly designated senior common stock at $15.00 per share. This offering is only being made to accredited investors. On April 29, 2010, we issued 2,060 shares of senior common stock at a gross price per share of $15.00 in the first closing of senior common stock. The net proceeds from the sale of the senior common stock will be used for investment in additional properties and mortgage loans, to repay indebtedness, to potentially purchase shares of our preferred stock on the open market, or other general corporate purposes.

As banks ~~begin~~recommence their general lending ~~again~~practices, we intend to obtain mortgages on any additional acquired properties by collateralizing the mortgages with some or all of our real property or by borrowing against our existing line of credit. We may ~~also~~ use these funds for general corporate needs. If we are unable to make any required debt payments on any borrowings, our lenders could foreclose on the properties

collateralizing their loans, which could cause us to lose part or all of our investments in such properties. We dohave $48.0 million of balloon principal payments maturing under one of our long-term mortgages in 2010; however the mortgage has three annual extension options through 2013, which we currently intend to exercise. At the time of notification of extension of the $48.0 million loan, we are required to remit a fee of 0.25% of the outstanding principal balance and a certification to the lender that our aggregate debt service coverage ratio is not less than 1.2 and as of March 31, 2010 we were in compliance with this covenant. The interest rate for the extension periods will adjust based upon the 1-year swap rate at the time of extension and a fixed spread of 4.16% in the first year, 4.29% in the second year and 4.41% in the third year. Based upon the current 1-year swap rate, the adjusted interest rate would be less than the current rate on the mortgage loan, though this rate could increase prior to our delivery of the extension notice later this year. We have ~~any~~no other balloon principal payments due under any of our ~~long-term~~ mortgages until ~~2010, and the $48.0 million mortgage that matures in 2010 has three annual extension options through~~ 2013.

We also need sufficient capital to fund our distributions to stockholders, pay the debt service costs on our existing long-term mortgages, and fund our current operating costs. We may require credits to our management fees, issued from our Adviser, in order to meet these obligations, although our Adviser is under no obligation to provide such credits, in whole or in part.

Our line of credit is a material source to satisfy our long-term liquidity requirements. As our line of credit matures in December 2010, we are actively seeking to negotiate a renewal of the line of credit or to find replacement financing. The ability to renew or find other replacement financing is not guaranteed and the cost of any such financing could be substantially higher than current debt costs. We routinely review our liquidity

requirements, and, provided that we are able to obtain a renewal of our line of credit or a new source of financing, either of which we expect to be able to procure, we believe that our current cash flows from operations, coupled with ~~our current availability on~~ our line of credit, are sufficient to continue operations and pay distributions to our ~~stockholders..~~stockholders.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by operating activities during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 was approximately ~~$12.1~~$3.6 million as compared to net cash provided by operating activities of approximately ~~$12.2~~$4.1 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009. This decrease was primarily a result of an increase in the amount of the net incentive fee paid to our Adviser coupled with an increase in capitalized expenses associated with our ongoing equity offerings. A majority of cash from operating activities is generated from the rental payments that we receive from our tenants and from the interest payments that we receive from our borrower. We utilize this cash to fund our property-level operating expenses and use the excess cash primarily for debt and interest payments on our mortgage notes payable, interest payments on our line of credit, distributions to our stockholders, management fees to our Adviser, and other ~~entity level~~entity-level expenses.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 was approximately ~~$13,000,~~$500,000, which primarily consisted of tenant improvements performed at our properties located in Eatontown, New Jersey and Maple Heights, Ohio and net payments to lenders for reserves, as compared to net cash used in investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2009 of approximately $1.2 million, which primarily consisted of an increase in the amount of restricted cash and net payments to lenders for reserves and leasing commissions paid related to the extension of the lease for our property located in Eatontown, New Jersey, partially offset by the proceeds from the sale of our property located in Norfolk, Virginia, as compared to net cash used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of approximately $50.1 million, which primarily consisted of the purchase of six properties.reserves. We have not purchased any properties since August 2008 because of the lack of access to capital as discussed in “Overview-Business Environment”above, which has resulted in ~~the~~a significant decrease in the cash used in investing ~~activities from 2008 to 2009.~~activities.

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 was approximately $2.9 million, which primarily consisted of distributions paid to our stockholders and principal repayments on mortgage notes payable, partially offset by net borrowings on our line of credit. Net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was approximately ~~$13.8~~$5.0 million, which primarily

consisted of repayment of our short-term loan, ~~repayments on our line of credit,~~ principal repayments on mortgage notes payable and distributions paid to our stockholders, partially offset by borrowing on our line of credit. Net cash provided by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 was approximately $39.6 million, which primarily consisted of the proceeds from borrowings from mortgage notes payable, borrowings on our line of credit, partially offset by payments for deferred financing costs, principal repayments on mortgage notes payable, repayments on our line of credit and distributions paid to our stockholders.

Mortgage Notes Payable

As of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 we had 16 fixed-rate mortgage notes payable in the aggregate principal amount of approximately ~~$253.4~~$252.1 million, collateralized by a total of 55 properties with terms at issuance ranging from 2 years to 25 years. The weighted-average interest rate on the mortgage notes payable as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 was approximately 6.0%.

Line of Credit

We have a $50.0 million senior revolving credit agreement, or Credit Agreement, with a syndicate of banks led by KeyBank National Association, or KeyBank, which ~~mature~~matures on December 29, ~~2009; however, we intend to exercise~~2010. Currently, eight of our option to extend the line of credit through December 29, 2010. On June 30, 2009, we amended our Credit Agreement to reduce our commitment from $95.0 million to $50.0 million, in exchange for modifications to certain terms under the Credit Agreement. The definition of FFO was modified to exclude from the calculation of FFO acquisition related costs thatproperties are ~~required to be expensed under ASC 805. In addition, the aggregate amount we can issue under the Credit Agreement~~pledged as ~~letters of credit was reduced from $20.0 million to $10.5 million.~~

~~As long as we are in compliance with covenants~~collateral under our line of credit, we have the option to extend the line of credit for an additional year, and we currently intend to exercise this option. We must notify KeyBank of our intention to exercise the renewal option 45 days prior to the maturity date and pay an extension fee of 0.20% of the total commitment outstanding at the date of notification.credit. The interest rate charged on the advances under the facility is based on LIBOR, the prime rate or the federal funds rate, depending on market conditions, and adjusts periodically. The unused portion of the line of credit is subject to a fee of 0.15% per year. Our ability to access this funding source is subject to ~~us continuing~~our continued ability to meet customary lending requirements such as compliance with financial and operating covenants and our meeting certain lending limits. One such covenant requires us to limit distributions to our stockholders to 95% of our ~~funds from operations, or~~ FFO less those acquisition related costs that are required to be expensed under ASC 805. In addition, the maximum amount that we may draw under this agreement is based on a percentage of the value of properties pledged as collateral to the banks, which must meet agreed upon eligibility standards. ~~In addition~~The maximum amount that we may draw under the Credit Agreement is approximately $45.1 million. Furthermore, those properties that are pledged as collateral to the banks are pledged through a perfected first priority lien in the equity interest of the special purpose entity, ~~(“SPE”)~~or SPE, that owns the property. In addition, ~~the Operating~~Gladstone Commercial Limited Partnership, ~~which is the entity~~a Delaware limited partnership that owns the SPEs, or the Operating Partnership, is precluded from transferring the SPEs or unconsolidated affiliates to us.

If and when long-term mortgages are arranged for these pledged properties, the banks will release the properties from the line of credit and reduce the availability under the line of credit by the advanced amount of the ~~removed~~released property. Conversely, as we purchase new properties meeting the eligibility standards, we may pledge these new properties to obtain additional advances under this agreement. The availability under the line of credit will also be reduced by letters of credit used in the ordinary course of business. We may use the advances under the line of credit for both general corporate purposes and the acquisition of new investments. ~~As of September 30, 2009,~~

At March 31, 2010, there was ~~$31.8~~$34.9 million outstanding under the line of credit at an interest rate of approximately 2.2%, and approximately $3.6 million outstanding under letters of credit at a weighted average interest rate of approximately 2.0%. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the remaining borrowing capacity available under the line of credit was approximately ~~$14.6~~$6.6 million. Our ability to increase the availability under our line of credit is dependent upon our pledging additional properties as collateral. Traditionally, we have pledged new properties to the line of credit as we arrange for long-term mortgages for these pledged properties. Currently, only nine of our properties do not have long-term mortgages, and eight of those are pledged as collateral under our line of credit. Accordingly, we have only one property which is unencumbered. We were in compliance with all covenants under the Credit Agreement as of March 31, 2010.

As our line of credit asmatures in December 2010, we are actively seeking to negotiate a renewal of ~~September 30, 2009.~~

~~Short-Term Loan~~

~~On December 21, 2007,~~the line of credit or to find replacement financing, though our ability to obtain replacement financing at the time of maturity could be constrained by current economic conditions affecting the credit markets generally. Consequently, no assurance can be given that we entered into a $20.0 million unsecured short-term loan with KeyBank, which matured on December 20, 2008. We exercised our option to extend the term for an additional six months and, on March 31, 2009, we repaidwill be successful in ~~full the unsecured short-term loan, using proceeds from borrowings under~~renewing or replacing our line of ~~credit. The interest rate charged~~credit with terms similar to our existing line of credit or at all. In the event that we are not able to obtain replacement financing for our credit facility on favorable terms, or at all, this could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, our ability to make distributions to our stockholders and our ability to fund new

investments. In the ~~loan was based on LIBOR, the prime rate or the federal funds rate, depending on market conditions,~~interim, in order to maintain sufficient liquidity and ~~adjusted periodically.~~capital resources, we have and will continue to evaluate all available financing options.

Contractual Obligations

The following table reflects our ~~significant~~material contractual obligations as of ~~September 30, 2009:~~March 31, 2010:


											Payments Due by Period
	Payments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years		Total		Less than 1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Debt Obligations⁽¹⁾	$	285,172,911	$	34,397,254	$	53,728,980	$	32,256,072	$	164,790,605		287,017,127	$	85,373,365	$	6,037,099	$	32,207,473	$	163,399,190
Interest on Debt Obligations⁽²⁾		82,209,977		16,166,528		24,049,137		22,255,673		19,738,639		74,733,711		11,730,500		23,698,172		21,930,064		17,374,975
Capital Lease Obligations⁽³⁾		300,000		—		—		—		300,000		300,000		-		-		300,000		-
Operating Lease Obligations⁽⁴⁾		1,791,997		152,510		305,021		305,021		1,029,445		1,715,742		152,510		305,021		305,021		953,190

Total	$	369,474,885	$	50,716,292	$	78,083,138	$	54,816,766	$	185,858,689	$	363,766,580	$	97,256,375	$	30,040,292	$	54,742,558	$	181,727,355

Funds from Operations

The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, developed FFO as a relative non-GAAP supplemental measure of operating performance of an equity REIT, in order to recognize that income-producing real estate historically has not depreciated on the same basis determined under GAAP. FFO, as defined by NAREIT, is net income (computed in accordance with GAAP), excluding gains or losses from sales of property, plus depreciation and amortization of real estate assets, and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

FFO does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP, which, unlike FFO, generally reflects all cash effects of transactions and other events in the determination of net income, and should not be considered an alternative to net income as an indication of our performance or to cash flows from operations as a measure of liquidity or ability to make distributions. Comparison of FFO, using the NAREIT definition, to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs.

FFO available to common stockholders is FFO adjusted to subtract preferred share distributions. We believe that net income available to common stockholders is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO available to common stockholders.

Basic funds from operations per share, or Basic FFO per share, and diluted funds from operations per share, or Diluted FFO per share, is FFO available to common stockholders divided by the number of weighted average shares of common ~~shares~~stock outstanding and FFO available to common stockholders divided by the number of weighted average shares of common ~~shares~~stock outstanding on a diluted basis, respectively, during a period. We believe that FFO available to common stockholders, Basic FFO per share and Diluted FFO per share are useful to investors because they provide investors with a further context for evaluating our FFO results in the same manner that investors use net income and earnings per share, or EPS, in evaluating net income available to common stockholders. In addition, ~~since~~because most REITs provide FFO available to common stockholders, Basic FFO and Diluted FFO per share information to the investment community, we believe these are useful supplemental measures ~~for~~when comparing us to other REITs. We believe that net income is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to FFO, Basic EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Basic FFO per share, and that diluted EPS is the most directly comparable GAAP measure to Diluted FFO per share.

The following table provides a reconciliation of our FFO for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008,~~ to the most directly comparable GAAP measure, net income, and a computation of basic and diluted FFO per weighted average share of common ~~share~~stock and basic and diluted net income per weighted average share of common ~~share:~~stock:


	For the three months ended March 31,
	2010			2009
Net income	$	1,086,333		$	1,089,569
Less: Distributions attributable to preferred stock		(1,023,438	)		(1,023,437	)

Net income available to common stockholders		62,895			66,132

Add: Real estate depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations		3,321,871			3,314,100

FFO available to common stockholders	$	3,384,766		$	3,380,232


Weighted average shares outstanding - basic & diluted		8,558,664			8,563,264

Basic & diluted net income per weighted average share of common stock	$	0.01		$	0.01

Basic & diluted FFO per weighted average share of common stock	$	0.40		$	0.39


Distributions declared per share of common stock	$	0.375		$	0.375


Percentage of FFO paid per share of common stock		95	%		95	%

3537

~~Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk~~


Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk includes risks that arise from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices, equity prices and other market changes that affect market sensitive instruments. The primary risk that we believe we will be exposed to is interest rate risk. We currently own one variable rate loan receivable, certain of our leases contain escalations based on market interest rates, and the interest rate on our existing line of credit is variable. Although we seek to mitigate this risk by structuring such provisions of our loans and leases to contain a minimum interest rate or escalation rate, as applicable, these features do not eliminate this risk. We ~~are also exposed to the effects of interest rate changes as a result of the holding of our cash and cash equivalents in short-term, interest-bearing investments. We~~ have not entered into any derivative contracts to attempt to further manage our exposure to interest rate fluctuations.

To illustrate the potential impact of changes in interest rates on our net income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008,~~ we have performed the following analysis, which assumes that our balance sheet remains constant and that no further actions beyond a minimum interest rate or escalation rate are taken to alter our existing interest rate sensitivity.

The following table summarizes the impact of a 1% increase and 1% decrease in the one month LIBOR for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and ~~2008.~~2009.


	For the three months ended September 30,						For the nine months ended September 30,						For the three months ended March 31,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009
1% increase in the one month LIBOR

Rental & interest income	$	—		$	27,308		$	5		$	82,106		$	-		$	-

Interest expense		81,267			77,178			241,150			229,856			87,250			83,000


Net decrease	$	(81,267	)	$	(49,869	)	$	(241,145	)	$	(147,750	)	$	(87,250	)	$	(83,000	)


Net income available to common stockholders (as reported)	$	255,553		$	118,122		$	415,194		$	707,395		$	62,895		$	66,132
Net decrease as percentage of
Net income available to common stockholders (as reported)		-31.8	%		-42.2	%		-58.1	%		-20.9	%

Net decrease as percentage of Net income available to common stockholders (as reported)														-138.7	%		-125.5	%

1% decrease in the one month LIBOR

Rental & interest income	$	—		$	(24,779	)	$	—		$	(75,939	)	$	-		$	-

Interest expense	$	(81,267	)	$	(77,178	)	$	(241,150	)	$	(229,856	)	$	(87,250	)	$	(83,000	)


Net increase	$	81,267		$	52,399		$	241,150		$	153,917		$	87,250		$	83,000


Net income available to common stockholders	$	255,553		$	118,122		$	415,194		$	707,395		$	62,895		$	66,132
Net increase as percentage of
Net income available to common stockholders		31.8	%		44.4	%		58.1	%		21.8	%

Net increase as percentage of Net income available to common stockholders														138.7	%		125.5	%

financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and caps in order to mitigate the interest rate risk on a related financial instrument. We will not enter into derivative or interest rate transactions for speculative purposes.

In addition to changes in interest rates, the value of our real estate is subject to fluctuations based on changes in local and regional economic conditions and changes in the creditworthiness of lessees and borrowers, all of which may affect our ability to refinance debt if necessary.

~~Item 4. Controls and Procedures~~


Item 4.		Controls and Procedures

a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 in providing a reasonable level of assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in applicable SEC rules and forms, including providing a reasonable level of assurance that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of necessarily achieving the desired control objectives, and management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

b) Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

3839

PART II —– OTHER INFORMATION

~~Item 1. Legal Proceedings~~


Item 1.		Legal Proceedings

Neither we nor any of our subsidiaries are currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us or our subsidiaries.

~~Item 1A. Risk Factors~~


Item 1A.		Risk Factors

Our business is subject to certain risks and events that, if they occur, could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations and the trading price of our common stock. For a discussion of these risks, please refer to the ~~“Risk~~section captioned “Item 1A. Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 25, 2009. In connection with our preparation of this quarterly report, we have reviewed and considered these risk factors and have determined that the following risk factor should be read in connection with the existing risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009, filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 24, 2010.

~~Our real estate investments have a limited~~Recent healthcare reform legislation may affect our revenue and financial condition.

On March 23, 2010, the President signed into law the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010 and on March 30, 2010, the President signed into law the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act, which in part modified the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Together, the two Acts serve as the primary vehicle for comprehensive health care reform in the United States. The Acts are intended to reduce the number of individuals in the United States without health insurance and effect significant other changes to the ways in which health care is organized, delivered and reimbursed. The complexities and ramifications of the new legislation are significant, and will be implemented in a phased approach beginning in 2010 and concluding in 2018. At this time, the effects of health care reform and its impact on our business, our revenues and financial condition and those of are tenants are not yet known. Accordingly, the reform could adversely affect the cost of providing healthcare coverage generally and the financial success of our tenants and are concentrated in a limited number of industries, which subjects us to an increased risk of significant loss if any one of these tenants is unable to pay or if particular industries experience downturns.

As of September 30, 2009, we owned 64 properties and had 50 tenants in these properties, and our 5 largest tenants accounted for approximately 24.0% of our total rental income. A consequence of a limited number of tenants is that the aggregate returns we realize may be substantially adversely affected by the unfavorable performance of a small number of tenants. We do not have fixed guidelines for industry concentration and our investments could potentially be concentrated in relatively few industries. As of September 30, 2009, 14.8% of our total rental income was earned from tenants in the electronic industry, 14.8% of our total rental income was earned from tenants in the healthcare, education and childcare industry and 13.1% of our total rental income was earned from tenants in the telecommunications industry. As a result, a downturn in an industry in which we have invested a significant portion of our total assets could have a material adverse effect onconsequently us.

~~Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~


Item 2.		Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

~~Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities~~


Item 3.		Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

~~Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~

~~No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the three months ended September 30, 2009.~~


Item 4.		Removed and Reserved

~~Item 5. Other Information~~


Item 5.		Other Information

Not applicable.

3940

~~Item 6. Exhibits~~


Item 6.		Exhibits

Exhibit Index


Exhibit		Description of Document
3.1		~~Amended~~Articles of Amendment and ~~Restated~~Restatement to Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registration Statement on Form S - -11 (File No. 333-106024), filed ~~September~~June 11, 2003.

3.1.1		Articles of Amendment to Articles of ~~Amended~~Articles of Amendment and ~~Restated~~Restatement to Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.1 to the Form 10-Q (File No. 001-33097), filed July 30, 2009.

3.1.2		Articles Supplementary, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K (File No. 001-33097), filed March 19, 2010.

3.2		Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registration Statement on Form S-11 (File No. 333-106024), filed ~~September~~June 11, 2003.

3.2.1		First Amendment to Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 of the Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 000-50363), filed July 10, 2007.

4.1		Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of the 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 of Form 8-A 12G (File No. 000-50363), filed January 19, 2006.

4.2		Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of the 7.5% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.4 of Form 8-A 12B (File No. 000-50363), filed October 19, 2006.

4.3		Form of Certificate for 7.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Gladstone Commercial Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-A 12G (File No. 000-50363), filed January 19, 2006.

4.4		Form of Certificate for 7.5% Series B Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock of Gladstone Commercial Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Form 8-A 12B (File No. 000-50363), filed October 19, 2006.

4.5		Articles Supplementary Establishing and Fixing the Rights and Preferences of Senior Common Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8-K (File No. 001-33097), filed April 29, 2010.

10.1		Amendment to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of Gladstone Commercial Limited Partnership, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K (File No. 001-33097), filed April 29, 2010.

10.2		Gladstone Commercial Limited Partnership Schedule 4.2(a)(3) to First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership: Designation of Senior Common Units, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K (File No. 001-33097), filed April 29, 2010.

11		Computation of Per Share Earnings from Operations (included in the notes to the unaudited ~~consolidated~~ financial statements contained in this report).

12		Statements re: computation of ratios (filed herewith).


	September 30, 2009			December 31, 2008			March 31, 2010				December 31, 2009
Real estate:
Land	$	55,035,962	⁽¹⁾	$	55,226,042	⁽¹⁾	$	55,025,707		⁽¹⁾	$	55,025,707	⁽¹⁾
Building		324,843,293			325,515,390
Building and improvements								326,249,499				325,907,479
Tenant improvements		9,820,706			9,820,706			9,820,706				9,820,706
Accumulated depreciation		(31,754,201	)		(24,757,576	)	(36,502,598		)		(34,111,952		)

Real estate, net	$	357,945,760		$	365,804,562		$	354,593,314			$	356,641,940


											March 31, 2010					December 31, 2009
	September 30, 2009					December 31, 2008							Accumulated					Accumulated
			Accumulated					Accumulated			Lease Intangibles		Amortization			Lease Intangibles		Amortization
	Lease Intangibles		Amortization			Lease Intangibles		Amortization
In-place leases	$	15,935,445	$	(6,323,990	)	$	15,981,245	$	(5,079,343	)	$	15,935,445	$	(7,159,647	)	$	15,935,445	$	(6,741,817	)
Leasing costs		9,909,528		(3,618,782	)		9,662,731		(2,987,360	)		10,057,222		(4,049,312	)		10,053,004		(3,832,623	)
Customer relationships		17,136,501		(4,076,341	)		17,136,501		(3,179,931	)		17,136,501		(4,669,756	)		17,136,501		(4,373,049	)

	$	42,981,474	$	(14,019,113	)	$	42,780,477	$	(11,246,634	)	$	43,129,168	$	(15,878,715	)	$	43,124,950	$	(14,947,489	)


					Rental Revenue for
Year of Lease					the Period Ended		Annualized Base		% of Annualized
Expiration	Square Feet		Number of Leases		March 31, 2010		Rental Revenue		Base Rent

2010		215,581		3	$	352,423	$	1,409,692		3.4	%
2011		-		0		-		-		0.0	%
2012		479,982		3		1,107,401		4,429,604		10.6	%
2013		438,422		6		1,168,337		4,673,348		11.2	%
2014		614,132		5		770,549		3,082,196		7.4	%
2015		896,876		8		1,717,794		6,871,176		16.5	%
2016		898,257		5		1,048,793		4,195,172		10.1	%
2017		102,200		1		230,731		922,924		2.2	%
2018		59,894		1		67,010		268,040		0.6	%
2019+		2,598,815		18		3,952,028		15,808,112		38.0	%


Total		6,304,159		50	$	10,415,066	$	41,660,264		100	%


(1)		Debt obligations represent borrowings under our line of credit, which represents ~~$31.8~~$34.9 million of the debt obligation due in less than 1 year, and mortgage notes payable that were outstanding as of ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010. The line of credit matures in December ~~2009, and we expect to exercise our option to extend the term for an additional year.~~2010. The $48.0 million mortgage note issued in September 2008 matures in October 2010, and we expect to exercise our options to extend the term through October 2013.

(2)		Interest on debt obligations includes estimated interest on our borrowings under our line of credit. The balance and interest rate on our line of credit is variable, thus the amount of interest calculated for purposes of this table was based upon rates and balances as of ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

(3)		Capital lease obligations represent the obligation to purchase the land held under the ground lease on our property located in Fridley, Minnesota.

(4)		Operating lease obligations represent the ground lease payments due on our Tulsa, Oklahoma property. The lease expires in June 2021.


Exhibit		Description of Document
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to ~~section~~Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002.~~2002 (filed herewith).

~~31.2~~31 .2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to ~~section~~Section 302 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002.~~2002 (filed herewith).

~~32.1~~32 .1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to ~~section~~Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002.~~2002 (furnished herewith).

~~32.2~~32 .2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to ~~section~~Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of ~~2002.~~2002 (furnished herewith).


	PAGE
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009		3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~		4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~		5

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		6

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		22

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		3738

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		3839

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings		3940

Item 1A. Risk Factors		3940

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		3940

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		3940

Item 4. ~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~Removed and Reserved		3940

Item 5. Other Information		3940

Item 6. Exhibits		4041

SIGNATURES		4143
~~EX-31.1~~
~~EX-31.2~~
~~EX-32.1~~
~~EX-32.2~~


(1)		Includes land held under a capital lease carried at approximately $1.1 million.


	Estimated
Year	Amortization Expense
Nine months ending December 31, 2010		4,390,722
2011		5,203,812
2012		4,398,005
2013		2,326,052
2014		2,062,779
2015		1,699,607
Thereafter	$	7,169,476


⁽¹⁾		The weighted average interest rate on all debt outstanding at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 was approximately ~~5.61%~~5.57%.

⁽²⁾		This note has three annual extension options, which ~~extends~~gives us the ability to extend the term of the note until October 1, 2013.

⁽³⁾		~~The line of credit may be extended for a one-year period at the Company’s option, subject to certain conditions.~~

⁽⁴⁾		~~The short-term loan was repaid in full on March 31, 2009.~~


	Scheduled principal			Scheduled principal
Year	payments			payments
Three months ending December 31, 2009	$	715,713
2010		50,533,486	⁽¹⁾
Nine months ending December 31, 2010				$	49,925,983	⁽¹⁾
2011		2,799,601			2,795,411
2012		3,087,824			3,083,429
2013		11,828,375			11,840,020
2014		20,367,143			20,401,572
2015					54,102,017
Thereafter		164,040,769			109,968,695

	$	253,372,911		$	252,117,127


⁽¹⁾		The $48.0 million mortgage note issued in September 2008 matures in October 2010, and we expect to exercise our options to extend ~~through~~the maturity date until October 2013.


⁽¹⁾		Operating expenses includes base management fees, incentive fees, ~~adminstration~~administration fees, professional fees, insurance expense, directors fees, ~~stockholder related~~stockholder-related expenses and general and administrative expenses that are not practicable to allocate to either operating segment, thus it is included in the “other” column.

⁽²⁾		Other expense includes interest expense on the Company’s line of credit and short-term loan of ~~$375,507~~$239,292 and ~~$1,100,405~~$404,922 (which is net of interest income on temporary investments, interest income on employee loans and other income) for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009, ~~and 2008, respectively, and $1,100,405 and $2,512,968 for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,~~ respectively. It is not practicable to allocate the interest from the line of credit or the short-term loan to either operating segment, thus it is included in the “other” column.


	Gladstone Commercial Corporation
Date: ~~November 4, 2009~~May 3, 2010	By: ��	/s/ Danielle Jones
		Danielle Jones
		Chief Financial Officer