UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended~~September 30, 2009~~ March 31, 2010


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ~~______~~ to ~~______~~

Commission file number: 1-1169

THE TIMKEN COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


~~OHIO~~		~~34-0577130~~
OHIO (State or other jurisdiction of		34-0577130 (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

1835 Dueber Ave., SW, Canton, OH		44706-2798
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

330.438.3000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yeso Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “small reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yeso Noþ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.


Class		Outstanding at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010
Common Stock, without par value		~~96,846,164~~96,822,937 shares

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of ~~Proceeds.~~Proceeds

~~EX-10.1~~

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

THE TIMKEN COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statement of Income
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net sales $ 763,644 $ 1,336,352 $ 2,367,021 $ 3,942,848
Cost of products sold 634,082 954,812 1,957,473 2,968,817

Gross Profit
129,562 381,540 409,548 974,031

Selling, administrative and general expenses 107,244 176,491 358,699 517,568
Impairment and restructuring charges 19,613 2,379 84,074 7,442

Operating Income (Loss)
2,705 202,670 (33,225 ) 449,021

Interest expense (10,319 ) (11,003 ) (27,188 ) (33,375 )
Interest income 348 1,428 1,254 4,294
Other (expense) income, net (4,519 ) (3 ) 3,319 15,820

(Loss) Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes
(11,785 ) 193,092 (55,840 ) 435,760
Provision for income taxes 7,116 68,121 2,900 155,078

(Loss) Income From Continuing Operations
(18,901 ) 124,971 (58,740 ) 280,682

(Loss) Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (30,803 ) 6,539 (59,912 ) 26,099

Net (Loss) Income
(49,704 ) 131,510 (118,652 ) 306,781
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest 424 1,097 (4,877 ) 2,960

Net (Loss) Income Attributable to The Timken Company
$ (50,128 ) $ 130,413 $ (113,775 ) $ 303,821

Amounts Attributable to The Timken Company’s Common Shareholders:

(Loss) Income from continuing operations $ (19,325 ) $ 123,874 $ (53,863 ) $ 277,722
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations, net of income taxes (30,803 ) 6,539 (59,912 ) 26,099

Net (Loss) Income Attributable to The Timken Company
$ (50,128 ) $ 130,413 $ (113,775 ) $ 303,821

Net (Loss) Income per Common Share Attributable to The Timken Company Common Shareholders

(Loss) earnings per share —Continuing Operations
$ (0.20 ) $ 1.28 $ (0.56 ) $ 2.89
(Loss) earnings per share —Discontinued Operations
(0.32 ) 0.07 (0.62 ) 0.27

Basic (loss) earnings per share
$ (0.52 ) $ 1.35 $ (1.18 ) $ 3.16

Diluted (loss) earnings per share —Continuing Operations
$ (0.20 ) $ 1.28 $ (0.56 ) $ 2.87
Diluted (loss) earnings per share— Discontinued Operations
(0.32 ) 0.07 (0.62 ) 0.27

Diluted (loss) earnings per share
$ (0.52 ) $ 1.35 $ (1.18 ) $ 3.14

Dividends per share
$ 0.09 $ 0.18 $ 0.36 $ 0.52


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2010			2009
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Net sales	$	913,690		$	866,616
Cost of products sold		690,999			712,002

Gross Profit		222,691			154,614

Selling, administrative and general expenses		133,057			123,411
Impairment and restructuring charges		5,525			13,755

Operating Income		84,109			17,448

Interest expense		(9,558	)		(8,429	)
Interest income		559			366
Other (expense) income, net		(601	)		7,973

Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes		74,509			17,358
Provision for income taxes		45,854			18,793

Income (Loss) From Continuing Operations		28,655			(1,435	)

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		336			(3,643	)

Net Income (Loss)		28,991			(5,078	)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest		374			(5,948	)

Net Income Attributable to The Timken Company	$	28,617		$	870


Amounts Attributable to The Timken Company’s Common Shareholders:
Income from continuing operations	$	28,281		$	4,513
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes		336			(3,643	)

Net Income Attributable to The Timken Company	$	28,617		$	870


Net Income (Loss) per Common Share Attributable to The Timken Company Common Shareholders

Earnings per share —Continuing Operations	$	0.29		$	0.05
Earnings (loss) per share —Discontinued Operations		0.01			(0.04	)

Basic earnings per share	$	0.30		$	0.01


Diluted earnings per share —Continuing Operations	$	0.29		$	0.05
Diluted earnings (loss) per share — Discontinued Operations		0.01			(0.04	)

Diluted earnings per share	$	0.30		$	0.01


Dividends per share	$	0.09		$	0.18

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Balance Sheet


	(Unaudited)
	September 30,			December 31,			(Unaudited)
	2009			2008			March 31,			December 31,
							2010			2009
(Dollars in thousands)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	382,878		$	133,383		$	709,301		$	755,545
Restricted cash		248,158			—
Accounts receivable, less allowances: 2009 — $58,101; 2008 — $55,043		458,393			575,915
Accounts receivable, less allowances: 2010 — $34,103; 2009 — $41,605								489,054			411,226
Inventories, net		716,948			1,000,493			689,372			671,236
Deferred income taxes		69,633			83,438			60,877			61,508
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses		17,536			9,671			11,624			11,758
Current assets, discontinued operations		364,494			182,861
Other current assets		58,657			47,704			98,763			111,287

Total Current Assets		2,316,697			2,033,465			2,058,991			2,022,560

Property, Plant and Equipment — Net		1,425,960			1,516,972
Property, Plant and Equipment—Net								1,302,542			1,335,228

Other Assets
Goodwill		222,225			221,435			221,038			221,734
Other intangible assets		134,437			140,898			129,762			132,088
Deferred income taxes		310,928			314,960			236,144			248,551
Non-current assets, discontinued operations		—			269,625
Other non-current assets		47,774			38,695			39,637			46,732

Total Other Assets		715,364			985,613			626,581			649,105

Total Assets	$	4,458,021		$	4,536,050		$	3,988,114		$	4,006,893


LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Short-term debt	$	63,323		$	91,482		$	29,958		$	26,345
Accounts payable and other liabilities		352,558			423,523
Accounts payable								221,852			156,004
Salaries, wages and benefits		147,848			217,090			161,567			142,471
Income taxes payable		—			22,467
Deferred income taxes		5,060			5,131			9,199			9,233
Current liabilities, discontinued operations		44,181			21,512
Other current liabilities								163,734			189,345
Current portion of long-term debt		268,537			17,108			14,679			17,035

Total Current Liabilities		881,507			798,313			600,989			540,433

Non-Current Liabilities
Long-term debt		469,057			515,250			471,229			469,287
Accrued pension cost		786,545			830,019			579,449			690,889
Accrued postretirement benefits cost		611,743			613,045			601,419			604,250
Deferred income taxes		8,479			8,540			6,611			6,091
Non-current liabilities, discontinued operations		—			23,860
Other non-current liabilities		109,717			83,985			98,928			100,375

Total Non-Current Liabilities		1,985,541			2,074,699			1,757,636			1,870,892

Shareholders’ Equity
Class I and II Serial Preferred Stock without par value:
Authorized — 10,000,000 shares each class, none issued								—			—
Common stock without par value:
Authorized — 200,000,000 shares
Issued (including shares in treasury) (2009 — 97,020,355 shares; 2008 — 96,891,501 shares)
Issued (including shares in treasury) (2010 — 97,717,490 shares; 2009 — 97,034,033 shares)
Stated capital		53,064			53,064			53,064			53,064
Other paid-in capital		839,719			838,315			858,131			843,476
Earnings invested in the business		1,431,701			1,580,084			1,422,782			1,402,855
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(747,157	)		(819,633	)		(699,291	)		(717,113	)
Treasury shares at cost (2009 — 174,191 shares; 2008 — 344,948 shares)		(4,493	)		(11,586	)
Treasury shares at cost (2010 — 894,553 shares; 2009 — 179,963 shares)								(23,567	)		(4,698	)

Total Shareholders’ Equity		1,572,834			1,640,244			1,611,119			1,577,584

Noncontrolling Interest		18,139			22,794			18,370			17,984

Total Equity		1,590,973			1,663,038			1,629,489			1,595,568

Total Liabilities and Equity	$	4,458,021		$	4,536,050
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity							$	3,988,114		$	4,006,893

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						Three Months Ended
	2009			2008			March 31,
							2010			2009
(Dollars in thousands)
CASH PROVIDED (USED)
Operating Activities
Net (loss) income attributable to The Timken Company	$	(113,775	)	$	303,821
Loss (earnings) from discontinued operations		59,912			(26,099	)
Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest		(4,877	)		2,960
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net income attributable to The Timken Company							$	28,617		$	870
Net (income) loss from discontinued operations								(336	)		3,643
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest								374			(5,948	)
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		150,835			154,965			47,748			50,148
Impairment charges		36,142			52			—			3,795
Loss (gain) on disposals of property, plant and equipment		3,608			(14,935	)
Deferred income tax (benefit) provision		(886	)		20,490
Stock based compensation expense		11,561			13,171
Loss (gain) on sale of assets								941			(492	)
Deferred income tax provision								21,659			(254	)
Stock-based compensation expense								4,547			4,409
Pension and other postretirement expense		77,092			62,342			25,204			26,938
Pension and other postretirement benefit payments		(89,216	)		(55,783	)
Pension contributions and other postretirement benefit payments								(118,702	)		(14,720	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		128,359			(81,248	)		(82,134	)		55,429
Inventories		311,517			(213,384	)		(22,533	)		59,948
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(169,367	)		97,129			60,405			(133,863	)
Other — net		(9,862	)		(15,316	)		19,994			(20,165	)

Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities — Continuing Operations		391,043			248,165
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Operating Activities — Continuing Operations								(14,216	)		29,738
Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities — Discontinued Operations		33,272			60,691			336			3,388

Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities		424,315			308,856
Net Cash (Used) Provided by Operating Activities								(13,880	)		33,126

Investing Activities
Capital expenditures		(80,953	)		(176,250	)		(13,981	)		(32,710	)
Acquisitions								—			(42	)
Proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment		2,940			30,095			167			2,359
Acquisitions		(353	)		(57,178	)
Other		4,233			3,984			(1,261	)		1,332

Net Cash Used by Investing Activities — Continuing Operations		(74,133	)		(199,349	)		(15,075	)		(29,061	)
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities — Discontinued Operations		(1,534	)		(10,063	)		—			(509	)

Net Cash Used by Investing Activities		(75,667	)		(209,412	)		(15,075	)		(29,570	)

Financing Activities
Cash dividends paid to shareholders		(34,608	)		(50,083	)		(8,690	)		(17,424	)
Net proceeds from common share activity		654			16,879			8,250			1,648
Accounts receivable securitization financing borrowings		—			225,000
Accounts receivable securitization financing payments		—			(130,000	)
Purchase of treasury shares — net								(13,986	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		254,051			773,301			2,051			—
Payments on long-term debt		(53,378	)		(846,987	)		(2,471	)		(207	)
Short-term debt activity — net		(37,039	)		(852	)		4,119			6,241
Increase in restricted cash		(248,158	)		—

Net Cash Used by Financing Activities		(118,478	)		(12,742	)		(10,727	)		(9,742	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		19,325			(14,483	)		(6,562	)		(3,086	)

Increase In Cash and Cash Equivalents		249,495			72,219
Decrease In Cash and Cash Equivalents								(46,244	)		(9,272	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		133,383			42,884			755,545			133,383

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Period	$	382,878		$	115,103
Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Year							$	709,301		$	124,111

See accompanying Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

Note 1 — Basis of Presentation

The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) for The Timken Company (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and notes required by the accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) and disclosures considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008.~~2009. Certain amounts in the ~~2008~~2009 Consolidated Financial Statements ~~and notes~~ have been reclassified to conform to the ~~2009~~2010 presentation.

On July 29, 2009, the Company announced it had signed an agreement to sell the assets of its Needle Roller Bearings (NRB) operations to JTEKT Corporation. The financial results for the NRB operations have been reclassified to Discontinued Operations for all periods presented. Refer to Note 18 — Divestitures for further discussion.

During the ~~second~~first quarter of 2009, the Company ~~evaluated~~recorded two adjustments related to its 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements. Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest increased by $6,100 (after-tax) due to a correction of an error related to the ~~classification~~$18,385 goodwill impairment loss the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of ~~its investments held by~~2008 for the ~~Company’s operations~~Mobile Industries segment. In recording this goodwill impairment loss, the Company did not recognize that a portion of the loss related to two separate subsidiaries in India and ~~concluded~~South Africa of which the Company holds less than 100% ownership. In addition, income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes decreased by $3,400, or $0.04 per share, ($2,044 after-tax or $0.02 per share) due to a correction of an error related to $3,400 of in-process research and development costs that were recorded in other current assets with the anticipation of being paid for by a ~~large portion~~third-party. However, the Company subsequently realized that the balance could not be substantiated through a contract with a third party. As a result of these ~~investments should be considered Cash and cash equivalents on~~errors, the Company’s ~~Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company’s conclusion~~first quarter 2009 results were overstated by $4,056 (after-tax). Management concluded the effect of these adjustments was based on the short-term and highly-liquid nature of the investments. At December 31, 2008, the Company held $23,640 of investments, of which $17,077 has been reclassified from Other current assets to Cash and cash equivalents to conformimmaterial to the ~~2009 presentation for these investments.~~

~~Management has evaluated~~Company’s 2008 and ~~disclosed all material events occurring subsequent to the date of the~~first-quarter 2009 financial statements ~~up to November 9,~~as well as the full-year 2009 ~~the filing date of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.~~financial statements.

Note 2 — New Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued final accounting rules that established the Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) as a single source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as well as interpretive releases are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. The new accounting ~~rules established two levels of U.S. GAAP — authoritative and non-authoritative. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC~~guidance that amended the accounting and ~~reporting standards and was effective~~disclosure requirements for the Company beginning July 1, 2009. The Codification was not intended to change or alter existing U.S. GAAP, and as a result, the new accounting rules establishing the Accounting Standards Codification did not have an impact on the Company’s resultsconsolidation of ~~operations and financial condition.~~

In September 2006, the FASB issued new accounting rules concerning fair value measurements. The new accounting rules establish a framework for measuring fair value that is based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information to develop those assumptions. Additionally, the new rules expand the disclosures about fair value measurements to include separately disclosing the fair value measurements of assets or liabilities within each level of the fair value hierarchy. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008.variable interest entities. The implementation of the new accounting ~~rules for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,~~guidance related to variable interest entities, effective January 1, ~~2009, did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.~~

In December 2007, the FASB issued new accounting rules related to business combinations. The new accounting rules provide revised guidance on how acquirers recognize and measure the consideration transferred, identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, noncontrolling interest and goodwill acquired in a business combination. The new accounting rules expand required disclosures surrounding the nature and financial effects of business combinations. The new accounting rules are effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The implementation of the new accounting rules for business combinations, effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

~~Note 2 — New Accounting Pronouncements (continued)~~

In December 2007, the FASB issued new accounting rules on noncontrolling interests. The new accounting rules establish requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company (sometimes called “minority interests”) to be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. All changes in the parent’s ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions, and any noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. The new accounting rules on noncontrolling interests are effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements. The implementation of new accounting rules on noncontrolling interests, effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

In March 2008, the FASB issued new accounting rules about derivative instruments and hedging activities, which amended previous accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. The new accounting rules require entities to provide greater transparency through additional disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The new accounting rules are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The implementation of the new accounting rules on derivative instruments and hedging activities, effective January 1, 2009, expanded the disclosures on derivative instruments and related hedged items and did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. See Note 16 — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for the expanded disclosures.

In June 2008, the FASB issued new accounting rules on the two-class method of calculating earnings per share. The new accounting rules clarify that unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive nonforfeitable dividends are participating securities. The new accounting rules provide guidance on how to allocate earnings to participating securities and compute earnings per share using the two-class method. The new accounting rules are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The new accounting rules on the two-class method of calculating earnings per share did not have a material impact on the Company’s disclosure of earnings per share. See Note 10 — Earnings Per Share for the computation of earnings per share using the two-class method.

In December 2008, the FASB issued new accounting rules on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. The new accounting rules require the disclosure of additional information about investment allocation, fair values of major categories of assets, development of fair value measurements and concentrations of risk. These new accounting rules are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of the new accounting rules on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

In May 2009, the FASB issued new accounting rules for subsequent events. The new accounting rules establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The new accounting rules are effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 and were adopted by the Company in the second quarter of 2009. The adoption of the new accounting rules for subsequent events2010, did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Note 3 — Inventories


	September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008		March 31, 2010		December 31, 2009

Inventories:
Inventories, net:
Manufacturing supplies	$	64,140	$	71,756	$	56,187	$	53,022
Work in process and raw materials		278,267		413,273		298,652		269,075
Finished products		374,541		515,464		334,533		349,139

Inventories — net	$	716,948	$	1,000,493
Total Inventories, net					$	689,372	$	671,236

An actual valuation of the inventory under the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must be based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these calculations are subject to many factors beyond management’s control, annual results may differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. The LIFO reserve at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 was ~~$274,950~~$243,795 and ~~$298,195,~~$237,669, respectively. The Company’s ~~Steel segment~~ recognized an increase in its LIFO reserve of $6,126 during the first quarter of 2010 compared to a decrease in its LIFO reserve of ~~$4,130 and $20,318, respectively,~~$11,832 during the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2009 as a result of expected lower year-end inventory quantities and material costs, especially scrap steel costs.~~2009.

Note 4 — Property, Plant and Equipment

The components of property, plant and equipment ~~are~~were as follows:


	September 30,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008			2010			2009

Property, Plant and Equipment:
Land and buildings	$	622,843		$	606,255		$	594,881		$	611,670
Machinery and equipment		3,032,108			2,985,799			2,825,392			2,786,444

Subtotal		3,654,951			3,592,054			3,420,273			3,398,114
Less allowances for depreciation		(2,228,991	)		(2,075,082	)		(2,117,731	)		(2,062,886	)

Property, Plant and Equipment — net	$	1,425,960		$	1,516,972		$	1,302,542		$	1,335,228

At ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, machinery and equipment included approximately ~~$114,500~~$110,000 and ~~$120,400,~~$104,300, respectively, of capitalized software. Depreciation expense for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 was $45,250 and ~~2008 was $44,992 and $46,488, respectively. Depreciation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $139,552 and $138,721,~~$46,764, respectively. Depreciation expense on capitalized software for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2010 and 2009 ~~and 2008~~ was approximately ~~$5,600~~$5,300 and ~~$4,800,~~$5,000, respectively. ~~Depreciation expense on capitalized software for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was approximately $15,900 and $13,300, respectively.~~

With the exception of the net assets of the NRB operations, there were no assets held for sale at September 30, 2009. Assets held for sale were $7,020 at December 31, 2008 and primarily consisted of three buildings comprising the Company’s former office complex in Torrington, Connecticut. In January 2009, the Company sold one of these buildings and recognized a pretax gain of $1,322. During the second quarter of 2009, in anticipation of the loss that the Company expected to record upon completion of the sale of the remaining buildings comprising the office complex, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $6,376. The Company finalized the sale of these remaining buildings on July 20, 2009 and recognized an additional loss of $689.

On February 15, 2008, the Company completed the sale of its former seamless steel tube manufacturing facility located in Desford, England for approximately $28,400. The Company recognized a pretax gain of approximately $20,200 during the first quarter of 2008 and recorded the gain in Other income (expense), net in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Income.

Note 5 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009 are~~March 31, 2010 were as follows:


	Beginning Balance		Acquisitions		Other		Ending Balance		Beginning Balance		Acquisitions		Impairment		Other			Ending Balance

Segment:
Process Industries	$	49,810	$	—	$	78	$	49,888	$	49,505	$	—	$	—	$	(410	)	$	49,095
Aerospace and Defense		161,990		347		359		162,696		162,588		—		—		(286	)		162,302
Steel		9,635		6		—		9,641		9,641		—		—		—			9,641

Total	$	221,435	$	353	$	437	$	222,225	$	221,734	$	—	$	—	$	(696	)	$	221,038

~~Acquisitions represent opening balance sheet allocation adjustments for acquisitions completed in 2008.~~ Other primarily includes foreign currency translation adjustments.

Note 5 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (continued)

The following table displays intangible assets as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008:~~2009:



	As of September 30, 2009						As of December 31, 2008
													As of March 31, 2010						As of December 31, 2009
	Gross				Net		Gross				Net		Gross				Net		Gross				Net
	Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying
	Amount		Amortization		Amount		Amount		Amortization		Amount		Amount		Amortization		Amount		Amount		Amortization		Amount

Intangible assets subject to amortization:
Customer relationships	$	79,139	$	13,353	$	65,786	$	79,139	$	10,020	$	69,119	$	79,139	$	15,390	$	63,749	$	79,139	$	14,321	$	64,818
Engineering drawings		2,000		2,000		—		2,000		2,000		—		2,000		2,000		—		2,000		2,000		—
Know-how		2,123		917		1,206		2,123		785		1,338		2,099		938		1,161		2,110		917		1,193
Land-use rights		7,948		2,894		5,054		7,060		2,462		4,598		7,950		3,036		4,914		7,948		2,964		4,984
Patents		4,432		2,803		1,629		4,432		2,459		1,973		4,432		3,034		1,398		4,432		2,936		1,496
Technology use		35,000		3,471		31,529		35,000		2,048		32,952		35,000		4,418		30,582		35,000		3,944		31,056
Trademarks		6,565		4,960		1,605		6,632		4,670		1,962		6,463		4,998		1,465		6,597		5,023		1,574
PMA licenses		8,792		1,832		6,960		8,792		1,753		7,039		8,792		2,320		6,472		8,792		2,207		6,585
Non-compete agreements		2,710		1,092		1,618		2,710		493		2,217		2,710		1,377		1,333		2,710		1,200		1,510
Unpatented technology		7,625		5,159		2,466		7,625		4,655		2,970		7,625		5,519		2,106		7,625		5,338		2,287

	$	156,334	$	38,481	$	117,853	$	155,513	$	31,345	$	124,168	$	156,210	$	43,030	$	113,180	$	156,353	$	40,850	$	115,503

Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
Goodwill	$	222,225	$	—	$	222,225	$	221,435	$	—	$	221,435	$	221,038	$	—	$	221,038	$	221,734	$	—	$	221,734
Tradename		1,400		—		1,400		1,400		—		1,400		1,400		—		1,400		1,400		—		1,400
Land-use rights		—		—		—		146		—		146
Industrial license agreements		964		—		964		964		—		964		962		—		962		965		—		965
FAA air agency certificates		14,220		—		14,220		14,220		—		14,220		14,220		—		14,220		14,220		—		14,220

	$	238,809	$	—	$	238,809	$	238,165	$	—	$	238,165	$	237,620	$	—	$	237,620	$	238,319	$	—	$	238,319

Total intangible assets	$	395,143	$	38,481	$	356,662	$	393,678	$	31,345	$	362,333	$	393,830	$	43,030	$	350,800	$	394,672	$	40,850	$	353,822

Amortization expense for intangible assets was $2,375 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $3,153 and $3,483, respectively. Amortization expense for intangible assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $10,101 and $10,256, respectively.March 31, 2010. Amortization expense for intangible assets is estimated to be approximately ~~$13,400~~$11,400 for ~~2009; $11,400 in~~ 2010; $11,000 in 2011; $10,600 in ~~2012 and~~2012; $8,100 in ~~2013.~~2013 and $7,700 in 2014.

Note 6 ~~— Equity Investments~~

The Company’s investments in less than majority-owned companies in which it has the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for using the equity method except when they qualify as variable interest entities and are consolidated.

Equity investments are reviewed for impairment when circumstances (such as lower-than-expected financial performance or change in strategic direction) indicate that the carrying value of the investment may not be recoverable. If impairment does exist, the equity investment is written down to its fair value with a corresponding charge to the Consolidated Statement of Income. An impairment charge of $1,346 was recorded during the third quarter of 2009 relating to the Company’s equity investment in Endorsia.com International AB.

Investments accounted for under the equity method were $12,943 and $13,634 at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, and were reported in Other non-current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

~~Note 6 — Equity Investments (continued)~~

The Company’s Mobile Industries segment has a joint venture with Advanced Green Components, LLC (AGC). AGC is engaged in the business of converting steel to machined rings for tapered bearings and other related products. During the third quarter of 2006, AGC refinanced its long-term debt of $12,240. The Company guaranteed half of this obligation. The Company concluded the refinancing represented a reconsideration event to evaluate whether AGC was a variable interest entity. The Company concluded that AGC was a variable interest entity and that the Company was the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the Company consolidated AGC, effective September 30, 2006. At September 30, 2009, net assets of AGC were $910, primarily consisting of the following: inventory of $5,397; property, plant and equipment of $20,691; short-term and long-term debt of $18,050; and other non-current liabilities of $7,365. All of AGC’s assets are collateral for its obligations. Except for AGC’s indebtedness for which the Company is a guarantor, AGC’s creditors have no recourse to the general credit of the Company.

~~The Company has no other variable interest entities, other than AGC, for which it is a primary beneficiary.~~

~~Note 7~~ — Financing Arrangements

Short-term debt at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 was as follows:


	September 30,		December 31,		March 31,		December 31,
	2009		2008		2010		2009


Variable-rate lines of credit for certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries with various banks with interest rates ranging from 0.85% to 10.50%	$	63,323	$	91,482
Variable-rate lines of credit for certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries with various banks with interest rates ranging from 1.98% to 4.86% and 1.98% to 5.05% at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively					$	29,958	$	26,345

Short-term debt	$	63,323	$	91,482	$	29,958	$	26,345

The lines of credit for certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries provide for borrowings up to ~~$383,325.~~$303,875. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company had borrowings outstanding of ~~$63,323,~~$29,958, which reduced the availability under these facilities to ~~$320,002.~~$273,917.

Note 6 — Financing Arrangements (continued)

The Company has a ~~$175,000~~$100,000 Accounts Receivable Securitization Financing Agreement (Asset Securitization Agreement), ~~renewable every 364 days.~~which expires on November 15, 2010. Under the terms of the Asset Securitization Agreement, which expires on ~~December 18, 2009,~~November 15, 2010, the Company sells, on an ongoing basis, certain domestic trade receivables to Timken Receivables Corporation, a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary that in turn uses the trade receivables to secure borrowings, which are funded through a vehicle that issues commercial paper in the short-term market. Borrowings under ~~the~~this agreement are limited to certain borrowing base calculations. Any amounts outstanding under ~~this~~the Asset Securitization Agreement would be reported on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet in ~~Short-term~~short-term debt. ~~As of September 30, 2009, there were no outstanding borrowings under the Asset Securitization Agreement.~~ Although the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Asset Securitization Agreement as of ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, certain borrowing base limitations reduced the availability under the Asset Securitization Agreement to ~~$75,647.~~$97,096. The ~~yield on the commercial paper,~~cost of this credit facility, which is the commercial paper rate plus program fees, is considered a financing cost and is included in ~~Interest~~interest expense in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

~~Note 7 — Financing Arrangements (continued)~~

Long-term debt at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 was as follows:

September 30, December 31,
2009 2008

Fixed-rate Medium-Term Notes, Series A, due at various dates through May 2028, with interest rates ranging from 6.74% to 7.76% $ 175,000 $ 175,000
Fixed-rate Senior Unsecured Notes, due September 15, 2014, with an interest rate of 6.0% 249,658 —
Variable-rate State of Ohio Water Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025 (0.34% at September 30, 2009) 12,200 12,200
Variable-rate State of Ohio Air Quality Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025 (1.59% at September 30, 2009) 9,500 9,500
Variable-rate State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on June 1, 2033 (0.99% at September 30, 2009) 17,000 17,000
Variable-rate Unsecured Canadian Note — 47,104
Fixed-rate Senior Unsecured Notes, maturing on February 15, 2010 with an interest rate of 5.75% 250,993 252,357
Variable-rate credit facility with US Bank for Advanced Green Components, LLC, maturing on July 17, 2010 (2.32% at September 30, 2009) 12,240 12,240
Other 11,003 6,957

737,594 532,358
Less current maturities 268,537 17,108

Long-term debt $ 469,057 $ 515,250


	March 31,		December 31,
	2010		2009

Fixed-rate Medium-Term Notes, Series A, due at various dates through May 2028, with interest rates ranging from 6.74% to 7.76%	$	175,000	$	175,000
Fixed-rate Senior Unsecured Notes, due September 15, 2014, with an interest rate of 6.0%		249,697		249,680
Variable-rate State of Ohio Water Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025 (0.22% at March 31, 2010)		12,200		12,200
Variable-rate State of Ohio Air Quality Development Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on November 1, 2025 (0.24% at March 31, 2010)		9,500		9,500
Variable-rate State of Ohio Pollution Control Revenue Refunding Bonds, maturing on June 1, 2033 (0.24% at March 31, 2010)		17,000		17,000
Variable-rate credit facility with US Bank for Advanced Green Components, LLC, maturing on July 17, 2010 (1.35% at March 31, 2010)		6,120		6,120
Variable-rate credit facility with US Bank for Advanced Green Components, LLC, guaranteed by The Timken Company, maturing on July 17, 2010 (4.813% at March 31, 2010)		3,320		5,620
Other		13,071		11,202

		485,908		486,322
Less current maturities		14,679		17,035

Long-term debt	$	471,229	$	469,287

On September 9, 2009, the Company completed a public offering of $250,000 of fixed-rate 6.0% unsecured Senior Notes, due in 2014. The net proceeds from the sale of the notes ~~will be~~were used for the repayment of the Company’s fixed-rate 5.75% unsecured Senior Notes, ~~maturing~~which were due to mature on February 15, 2010.

On July 10, 2009, the Company entered into a new $500,000 ~~million~~ Amended and Restated Credit Agreement ~~(new Senior~~(Senior Credit Facility). At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility but had letters of credit outstanding totaling ~~$35,543,~~$32,163, which reduced the availability under the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility to ~~$464,457.~~$467,837. This ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility matures on July 10, 2012. Under the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility, the Company has three financial covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio, a consolidated interest coverage ratio and a consolidated minimum tangible net worth test. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company was in full compliance with the covenants under the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility.

~~In December 2005,~~Advanced Green Components, LLC (AGC) is a joint venture of the ~~Company entered into an unsecured loan in Canada. The Company repaid a portion of this loan in June 2009 and repaid the remaining balance on July 10, 2009.~~

Company. The Company is the guarantor of ~~$6,120~~$3,320 of AGC’s ~~$12,240 credit facility. Refer to Note 6 — Equity Investments for additional discussion. Effective as of July 17, 2009, AGC renewed its $12,240~~$9,440 credit facility with US ~~Bank for another 365 days. The Company continues to guarantee half of this obligation.~~Bank.

108

Note 87 — Product Warranty

The Company provides limited warranties on certain of its products. The Company accrues liabilities for warranty policies based upon specific claims and a review of historical warranty claim experience in accordance with accounting rules relating to contingent liabilities. The Company records and accounts for ~~contingencies established by the FASB.~~its warranty reserve based on specific claim incidents. Should the Company become aware of a specific potential warranty claim for which liability is probable and reasonably estimable, a specific charge is recorded and accounted for accordingly. Adjustments are made quarterly to the accruals as claim data and historical experience change.

The following is a rollforward of the warranty accruals for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and the twelve months ended December 31, ~~2008:~~2009:


	September 30,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008			2010			2009


Beginning balance, January 1	$	13,515		$	12,571		$	5,420		$	13,515
Expense		3,922			7,525			1,358			4,699
Payments		(9,209	)		(6,581	)		(783	)		(12,794	)

Ending balance	$	8,228		$	13,515		$	5,995		$	5,420

The product warranty accrual at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 was included in ~~Accounts payable and~~ other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.

Note 98 — Equity

Earnings Accumulated
Other Invested Other
Stated Paid-In in the Comprehensive Treasury Noncontrolling
Total Capital Capital Business Income Stock Interest

Balance at December 31, 2008 $ 1,663,038 $ 53,064 $ 838,315 $ 1,580,084 $ (819,633 ) $ (11,586 ) $ 22,794

Net loss (118,652 ) (113,775 ) (4,877 )

Foreign currency translation adjustment 54,341 54,341
Pension and postretirement liability adjustment (net of income tax of $12,949) 18,823 18,823
Unrealized loss on marketable securities (net of income tax of $41) (76 ) (61 ) (15 )
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments, net of reclassifications (627 ) (627 )

Total comprehensive loss (46,191 )
Capital investment of Timken XEMC (Hunan) Bearings Co. 1,000 1,000
Dividends declared to noncontrolling interest (763 ) (763 )
Dividends — $0.36 per share (34,608 ) (34,608 )
Issuance of 170,757 shares from treasury and 128,853 shares from authorized 8,497 1,404 7,093

Balance at September 30, 2009
$ 1,590,973 $ 53,064 $ 839,719 $ 1,431,701 $ (747,157 ) $ (4,493 ) $ 18,139


				The Timken Company Shareholders
								Earnings			Accumulated
						Other		Invested			Other
				Stated		Paid-In		in the			Comprehensive			Treasury			Noncontrolling
	Total			Capital		Capital		Business			Income			Stock			Interest

Balance at December 31, 2009	$	1,595,568		$	53,064	$	843,476	$	1,402,855		$	(717,113	)	$	(4,698	)	$	17,984


Net income		28,991							28,617									374

Foreign currency translation adjustment		(13,187	)									(13,187	)
Pension and postretirement liability adjustment (income tax benefit of $8,907)		29,419										29,421						(2	)
Unrealized loss on marketable securities (net of income tax of $28)		69										55						14
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments, net of reclassifications		1,533										1,533

Total comprehensive income		46,825
Dividends — $0.09 per share		(8,690	)						(8,690	)
Tax benefit from compensation		69					69
Stock-based compensation expense		4,547					4,547
Tender of 714,590 shares to treasury		(17,011	)				1,858								(18,869	)
Issuance of 683,457 shares from authorized		8,181					8,181

Balance at March 31, 2010	$	1,629,489		$	53,064	$	858,131	$	1,422,782		$	(699,291	)	$	(23,567	)	$	18,370

The total comprehensive loss for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2009 was ~~$5,663. The total comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $41,558 and $272,002, respectively.~~$39,688.

119

Note 109 — Earnings Per Share

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of the numerator and the denominator of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and ~~2008:~~2009:

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008

Numerator:
(Loss) income from continuing operations attributable to The Timken Company $ (19,325 ) $ 123,874 $ (53,863 ) $ 277,722
Less: distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested stock — (833 ) — (1,902 )

(Loss) income from continuing operations available to common shareholders for basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share $ (19,325 ) $ 123,041 $ (53,863 ) $ 275,820

Denominator:
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding — basic 96,176,091 95,878,978 96,111,847 95,574,420
Effect of dilutive options — 224,152 — 394,239

Weighted-average number of shares outstanding, assuming dilution of stock options 96,176,091 96,103,130 96,111,847 95,968,659

Basic (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations $ (0.20 ) $ 1.28 $ (0.56 ) $ 2.89

Diluted (loss) earnings per share from continuing operations $ (0.20 ) $ 1.28 $ (0.56 ) $ 2.87

In periods in which a net loss has occurred, as is the case for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the dilutive effect of stock options is not recognized and thus is not utilized in the calculation of dilutive earnings per share.


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2010		2009

Numerator:
Income from continuing operations attributable to The Timken Company	$	28,281	$	4,513
Less: distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to nonvested stock		115		31

Income from continuing operations available to common shareholders for basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share	$	28,166	$	4,482


Denominator:
Weighted average number of shares outstanding — basic		96,360,137		96,028,860
Effect of dilutive options		340,119		—

Weighted average number of shares outstanding, assuming dilution of stock options		96,700,256		96,028,860

Basic earnings per share from continuing operations	$	0.29	$	0.05

Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations	$	0.29	$	0.05

The exercise prices for certain stock options that the Company has awarded exceed the average market price of the Company’s common stock. Such stock options are antidilutive and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share. The antidilutive stock options outstanding were ~~40,350~~2,367,304 and ~~536,456, respectively, for~~4,938,146 during the ~~three months~~first quarter of 2010 and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2008.~~2009, respectively.

1210

Note 1110 — Segment Information

The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to certain items that management considers not representative of ongoing operations such as impairment and restructuring, manufacturing rationalization and integration costs, one-time gains and losses on disposal of non-strategic assets, allocated receipts ~~received~~ or payments made under the U.S. Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA) and gains and losses on the dissolution of subsidiaries).


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						Three Months Ended
	2009			2008			2009			2008			March 31,
													2010			2009

Net sales to external customers:
Mobile Industries	$	327,572		$	426,489		$	920,385		$	1,397,565		$	367,489		$	300,623
Process Industries		186,392			316,904			616,884			895,622			205,901			224,174
Aerospace and Defense		100,272			104,711			318,767			302,208			92,093			109,254
Steel		149,408			488,248			510,985			1,347,453			248,207			232,565

	$	763,644		$	1,336,352		$	2,367,021		$	3,942,848		$	913,690		$	866,616


Intersegment sales:
Process Industries	$	577		$	972		$	2,199		$	2,252		$	669		$	922
Steel		8,539			48,291			30,365			133,002			22,120			16,003

	$	9,116		$	49,263		$	32,564		$	135,254
													$	22,789		$	16,925

Segment EBIT, as adjusted:
Mobile Industries	$	13,745		$	8,684		$	(601	)	$	43,387		$	42,454		$	(2,345	)
Process Industries		16,081			73,296			94,626			180,929			26,939			43,492
Aerospace and Defense		19,114			9,819			55,955			24,036			12,801			18,108
Steel		(20,266	)		133,802			(60,435	)		267,499			19,902			(7,262	)

Total EBIT, as adjusted, for reportable segments		28,674			225,601			89,545			515,851		$	102,096		$	51,993

Unallocated corporate expense		(10,310	)		(19,024	)		(35,802	)		(54,724	)
Unallocated corporate expenses														(13,779	)		(12,317	)
Impairment and restructuring		(19,613	)		(2,379	)		(84,074	)		(7,442	)		(5,525	)		(13,755	)
Rationalization and integration charges		(1,488	)		48			(5,228	)		(3,447	)		(1,475	)		(1,465	)
(Loss) gain on sale of non-strategic assets, net of dissolution of subsidiary		(2,587	)		(558	)		(608	)		19,987
Other														(205	)		1,222
Interest expense		(10,319	)		(11,003	)		(27,188	)		(33,375	)		(9,558	)		(8,429	)
Interest income		348			1,428			1,254			4,294			559			366
Intersegment eliminations		3,510			(1,021	)		6,261			(5,384	)
Intersegment adjustments														2,396			(257	)

(Loss) Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes	$	(11,785	)	$	193,092		$	(55,840	)	$	435,760
Income from continuing operations before income taxes													$	74,509		$	17,358

Intersegment sales represent sales between the segments. These sales are eliminated ~~upon~~in consolidation.

~~The following table presents assets employed by segment for the periods ended September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:~~

September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008

Mobile Industries $ 1,575,195 $ 1,299,095
Process Industries 824,591 885,689
Aerospace and Defense 541,019 606,753
Steel 951,254 1,078,597
Corporate 201,468 213,430

$ 4,093,527 $ 4,083,564
Discontinued operations 364,494 452,486

$ 4,458,021 $ 4,536,050

1311

Note 1211 — Impairment and Restructuring Charges

Impairment and restructuring charges by segment ~~are~~were comprised of the following:

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009:~~March 31, 2010:

Mobile Process Aerospace and
Industries Industries Defense Steel Corporate Total

Impairment charges $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
Severance expense and related benefit costs 11,371 6,477 745 19 195 18,807
Exit costs 565 241 — — — 806

Total $ 11,936 $ 6,718 $ 745 $ 19 $ 195 $ 19,613

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2009:~~


	Mobile		Process		Aerospace and								Mobile		Process		Aerospace &
	Industries		Industries		Defense		Steel		Corporate		Total		Industries		Industries		Defense		Steel		Corporate		Total


Impairment charges	$	2,965	$	29,847	$	1,984	$	—	$	—	$	34,796	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Severance expense and related benefit costs		27,467		11,319		2,247		3,223		2,055		46,311		2,253		1,527		630		19		570		4,999
Exit costs		1,359		1,607		—		1		—		2,967		394		30		102		—		—		526

Total	$	31,791	$	42,773	$	4,231	$	3,224	$	2,055	$	84,074	$	2,647	$	1,557	$	732	$	19	$	570	$	5,525

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008:~~March 31, 2009:

Mobile Process Aerospace and
Industries Industries Defense Steel Corporate Total

Impairment charges $ — $ — $ — $ — $ — $ —
Severance expense and related benefit costs 588 (147 ) — — — 441
Exit costs 1,724 190 — 24 — 1,938

Total $ 2,312 $ 43 $ — $ 24 $ — $ 2,379

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2008:~~


	Mobile		Process			Aerospace and								Mobile		Process		Aerospace &
	Industries		Industries			Defense		Steel		Corporate		Total		Industries		Industries		Defense		Steel		Corporate		Total


Impairment charges	$	—	$	52		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	52	$	769	$	3,026	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	3,795
Severance expense and related benefit costs		3,805		(148	)		—		—		—		3,657		6,738		959		54		446		1,200		9,397
Exit costs		1,723		1,621			—		389		—		3,733		—		562		—		1		—		563

Total	$	5,528	$	1,525		$	—	$	389	$	—	$	7,442	$	7,507	$	4,547	$	54	$	447	$	1,200	$	13,755

~~Note 12 — Impairment and Restructuring Charges (continued)~~

Selling and Administrative Reductions

In March 2009, the Company announced the realignment of its organization to improve efficiency and reduce costs as a result of the economic downturn. The Company initially targeted pretax savings of approximately $30,000 to $40,000 in annual selling and administrative costs. In April 2009, in light of the Company’s revised forecast indicating significantly reduced sales and earnings for the year, the Company expanded the target to approximately $80,000. The implementation of these savings began inDuring the first quarter of ~~2009~~2010 and is expected to be significantly completed by the end of the fourth quarter of 2009, with full-year savings expected to be achieved in 2010. As the Company streamlines its operating structure, it expects to cut its sales and administrative associate workforce by up to 400 positions in 2009, incurring severance costs of approximately $15,000 to $20,000. During the first nine months of 2009, the Company ~~recognized $10,613~~recorded $1,348 and $2,307, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs related to this initiative ~~eliminating~~to eliminate approximately ~~270 associates.~~25 employees and 26 employees, respectively. Of the ~~$10,613~~$1,348 charge ~~for~~recorded during the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009, $4,524~~2010, $570 related to Corporate, $375 related to the Process Industries Segment, $292 related to the Mobile Industries segment, ~~$1,944 related to the Process Industries segment, $552~~$90 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment ~~$1,538~~and $21 related to the Steel segment. Of the $2,307 charge recorded during the first quarter of 2009, $1,200 related to Corporate, $472 related to the Mobile Industries segment, $446 related to the Steel segment, ~~and $2,055~~$180 related to ~~Corporate.~~the Process Industries segment and $9 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment.

Manufacturing Workforce Reductions

During the ~~third~~first quarter of 2010, the Company recorded $3,319 in severance and related benefit costs to eliminate approximately 60 associates to properly align its business as a result of the continued downturn in the economy and expected market demand. Of the $3,319 charge, $1,627 related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1,152 related to the Process Industries segment and $540 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment. During the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2009, the Company recorded ~~$13,555 and $28,819, respectively,~~$6,515 in severance and related benefit costs, including a curtailment of pension benefits of ~~$1,611 for the first nine months of 2009,~~$1,850, to eliminate approximately ~~3,000~~800 associates to properly align its business as a result of the ~~current~~continued downturn in the economy and expected market demand. Of the ~~$13,555~~$6,515 charge, ~~$10,268~~$5,709 related to the Mobile Industries segment, ~~$2,304~~$761 related to the Process Industries segment and ~~$983~~$45 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment. Of the $28,819 charge, $20,603 related to the Mobile Industries segment, $4,836 related to the Process Industries segment, $1,695 related to the Aerospace and Defense segment and $1,685 related to the Steel segment.

~~Bearings and Power Transmission Reorganization~~

In August 2007, the Company announced the realignment of its management structure. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company began to operate under two major business groups: the Steel Group and the Bearings and Power Transmission Group. The Bearings and Power Transmission Group includes three reportable segments: Mobile Industries, Process Industries and Aerospace and Defense. The Company realized pretax savings of approximately $18,000 in 2008 as a result of these changes. During the first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded $1,948 of severance and related benefit costs related to this initiative.

~~Torrington Campus~~

On July 20, 2009, the Company sold the remaining portion of its Torrington, Connecticut office complex. In anticipation of the loss that the Company expected to record upon completion of the sale of the office complex, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $6,376 during the second quarter of 2009. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded an additional loss of $689 in Other (expense) income, net on the sale of the remaining portion of this office complex.

Mobile Industries

In March 2007, the Company announced the ~~planned~~ closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The Company completed the closure of this ~~manufacturing~~ facility ~~was subsequently delayed~~on March 31, 2010. The Company expects to serve higher customer demand. However, with the current downturn in the economy, the Company believes it will close this facility before the end of 2010. This closure is targeted to deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $5,000, with expectedincur pretax costs of approximately $25,000 to $30,000, which includes restructuring costs and rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses. ~~Due to the delay in the closure of this manufacturing facility, the Company expects to realize the $5,000 of annual pretax savings by the end of 2010, once this facility closes.~~ Mobile Industries has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately ~~$21,978~~$25,292 as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 related to this closure. During the ~~third~~first quarter of 2010 and ~~first nine months of~~ 2009, the Company recorded ~~$1,322~~$312 and ~~$2,520,~~$557, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs ~~and exit costs of $699 and $1,467, respectively,~~ associated with the ~~planned~~ closure of the Company’s Sao Paulo, Brazil manufacturing facility. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded $611 and $1,613, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs and exit costs of $807 associated with the planned closure of the Company’s San Paulo, Brazil manufacturingthis facility.

In addition to the above charges, the Company recorded impairment charges of ~~$897~~$769 during the first quarter of 2009 related to an impairment of fixed assets at one of its facilities in France as a result of the carrying value of these assets exceeding expected future cash flows.

1512

Note 1211 — Impairment and Restructuring Charges (continued)

Process Industries

In May 2004, the Company announced plans to rationalize ~~its~~the Company’s three bearing plants in Canton, Ohio within the Process Industries segment. ~~This rationalization initiative is expected~~The Company expects to ~~deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $35,000 through streamlining operations and workforce reductions, with~~incur pretax costs of approximately $70,000 to $80,000 (including pretax cash costs of approximately ~~$45,000 to~~ $50,000), by the ~~end~~middle of ~~2009.~~2010.

~~The Company recorded exit costs of $241 during the third quarter of 2009 related to Process Industries’ rationalization plans.~~ During the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2009, the Company recorded impairment charges of ~~$27,651~~$3,026 and exit costs of ~~$1,607. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded exit costs of $190 and $1,621, respectively,~~$562 as a result of Process Industries’ rationalization plans. The significant impairment charge recorded during the first nine months of 2009 is a result of the rapid deterioration of the market sectors served by one of the rationalized plants, resulting in the carrying value of the fixed assets for this plant exceeding its estimated future cash flows and being written down to their fair value. The Company now expects to close this facility by the end of 2009. The Process Industries segment has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately $67,973 (including approximately $25,300 of pretax cash costs) through September 30, 2009 for these rationalization plans includingIncluding rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general ~~expenses. The~~expenses, the Process Industries segment has ~~realized~~incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately ~~$15,000 in annual pretax savings through September 30, 2009~~$69,761 as ~~a result~~ of March 31, 2010 for these ~~actions.~~

In October 2009, the Company announced the consolidation of its distribution centers in Bucyrus, Ohio and Spartanburg, South Carolina into a larger, leased facility in the region near the existing Spartanburg location. The closure of the Bucyrus Distribution Center will displace approximately 290 associates. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded $4,482 of severance and related benefit costs related to this closure.

~~Steel~~

In April 2007, the Company completed the closure of its seamless steel tube manufacturing facility located in Desford, England. The Company recorded $389 of exit costs during the first nine months of 2008 related to this action.rationalization plans.

The following is a rollforward of the consolidated restructuring accrual for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and the twelve months ended December 31, ~~2008:~~2009:


	September 30,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
	2009			2008			2010			2009


Beginning balance, January 1	$	17,021		$	19,062		$	33,967		$	17,021
Expense		47,667			12,709			5,525			55,598
Payments		(29,775	)		(14,750	)		(14,469	)		(38,652	)

Ending balance	$	34,913		$	17,021		$	25,023		$	33,967

The restructuring accrual at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 is included in ~~Accounts payable and~~ other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The ~~restructuring~~ accrual at ~~September 30, 2009 excludes costs related to the curtailment of pension benefit plans of $1,611. The accrual at September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 includes ~~$27,481~~$18,578 of severance and related benefits, with ~~the remainder of~~ the balance primarily representing environmental exit costs. The majority of the ~~$27,481~~$18,578 accrual relating to severance and related benefits is expected to be paid by the end of 2010. In addition to the restructuring accrual presented above, the Company has $1,846 of restructuring accruals at September 30, 2009 related to the NRB operations that will be retained by the Company. The expense related to these retained restructuring accruals has been reclassified to discontinued operations.

Note 1312 — Retirement and Postretirement Benefit Plans

The following table sets forth the net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s retirement and postretirement benefit plans. The amounts for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 are based on actuarial calculations prepared during ~~2008.~~2009. Consistent with prior years, these calculations will be updated later in the year. These updated calculations may result in different net periodic benefit cost for 2010. The net periodic benefit cost recorded for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 is the Company’s best estimate of ~~each~~the period’s proportionate share of the amounts to be recorded for the year ~~ended~~ending December 31, ~~2009.~~2010.


	Pension						Postretirement						Pension						Postretirement
	Three Months ended						Three Months ended						Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,						March 31,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009			2010			2009

Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	9,645		$	9,010		$	656		$	781		$	9,525		$	8,622		$	679		$	789
Interest cost		39,459			39,793			9,721			9,794			39,749			39,409			9,144			10,599
Expected return on plan assets		(48,526	)		(50,254	)		—			—			(49,290	)		(47,328	)		—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		2,880			3,143			(561	)		(544	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		8,984			7,247			934			900
Curtailment loss		2,811			—			3,399			—
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)														2,267			2,861			(385	)		(544	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss														12,204			9,444			1,312			1,256
Pension curtailments and settlements														—			1,850			—			—
Amortization of transition asset		(23	)		(23	)		—			—			(1	)		(20	)		—			—

Net periodic benefit cost	$	15,230		$	8,916		$	14,149		$	10,931		$	14,454		$	14,838		$	10,750		$	12,100

Pension Postretirement
Nine Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008

Components of net periodic benefit cost

Service cost $ 28,829 $ 27,107 $ 1,970 $ 2,344
Interest cost 117,605 120,047 29,162 30,511
Expected return on plan assets (144,771 ) (151,488 ) — —
Amortization of prior service cost 8,615 9,443 (1,684 ) (1,633 )
Recognized net actuarial loss 26,806 21,801 2,803 4,282
Curtailment loss 4,422 — 3,399 —
Amortization of transition asset (64 ) (72 ) — —

Net periodic benefit cost $ 41,442 $ 26,838 $ 35,650 $ 35,504

The net periodic benefit for defined benefit pension and postretirement plans retained by NRB are classified as discontinued operations. As a result of the pending sale of the NRB operations, the Company recognized a pretax curtailment loss of $2,811 for the pension benefit obligations and $3,399 for postretirement benefit obligations.

Note 1413 — Income Taxes


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,						March 31,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2010			2009


Provision for income taxes	$	7,116		$	68,121		$	2,900		$	155,078		$	45,854		$	18,793
Effective tax rate		(60.4	)%		35.3	%		(5.2	)%		35.6	%		61.5	%		108.3	%

The Company’s provision for income taxes in interim periods is computed in accordance with interim period income tax accounting rules by applying the appropriate annual effective tax rates to income or loss before income taxes for the period. In addition, non-recurring or discrete items, including interest on prior year tax liabilities, are recorded during the period in which they occur.

~~Note 14 — Income Taxes (continued)~~

The effective tax ~~rates on~~rate in the ~~pretax losses for the third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2009 were unfavorable relative to~~2010 was higher than the U.S. federal statutory tax rate primarily due to a $21,621 charge to income tax expense to record the deferred tax impact of the recently enacted U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (as amended), losses at certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded ~~as well as the net impact of discrete tax adjustments recorded during the periods.~~and U.S. state and local taxes. These ~~items~~increases were partially offset by the earnings in certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35% ~~and the net effect~~.

The first quarter of ~~other U.S. tax items. Application~~2009 resulted in $18,793 of ~~interim period~~ income tax ~~accounting rules has caused significant volatility in the 2009 quarterly effective tax rates. For the full year of 2009, the Company expects its~~expense, or an effective tax rate toof 108.3%. This tax rate was caused by an application of the interim period accounting rules for income taxes, as income tax expense on earnings from profitable affiliates exceeded tax benefits that could be ~~in the range of 25% to 30%.~~recorded on losses from unprofitable affiliates.

In the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009,~~2010, the Company recorded a $14,096 adjustment to other comprehensive income for deferred taxes on postretirement prescription drug benefits, specifically the employer subsidy provided by the U.S. government under the Medicare Part D program (the Medicare subsidy). During the first quarter of 2010, the Company determined it had provided deferred taxes on postretirement benefit plan accruals recorded through other comprehensive income net of the Medicare subsidy, rather than on a gross basis. The cumulative impact of this error resulted in a cumulative understatement of deferred tax assets totaling $14,096 and a corresponding understatement of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Management concluded the effect of the adjustment was not material to the Company’s ~~unrecognized tax benefits increased by $5,200. This increase represents an increase of $14,200 for tax positions related to~~ prior three fiscal years ~~offset by a decrease of $9,000 related to lapses in statutes of limitation. As of September 30,~~and first quarter 2010 financial statements, as well as the estimated full-year 2010 financial statements.

Note 14 — Divestitures

On December 31, 2009, the Company ~~had~~completed the sale of the assets of its Needle Roller Bearings (NRB) operations to JTEKT Corporation (JTEKT). The Company received approximately ~~$76,900~~$304 million in cash proceeds for these operations and retained certain receivables, subject to post-sale working capital adjustments. The NRB operations primarily serve the automotive original-equipment market sectors and manufacture highly engineered needle roller bearings, including an extensive range of ~~total gross unrecognized tax benefits. Included~~radial and thrust needle roller bearings bearing assemblies and loose needles for automotive and industrial applications. The NRB operations have facilities in the United States, Canada, Europe and China. Results for 2009 for the NRB operations are presented as discontinued operations.

Note 14 — Divestitures (continued)

The following results of operations for this ~~amount is approximately $38,200, which represents~~business have been treated as discontinued operations for all periods presented.


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2010			2009


Net sales	$	—		$	93,762
Cost of goods sold		—			96,250

Gross profit		—			(2,488	)
Selling, administrative and general expenses		—			15,584
Impairment and restructuring charges		—			989
Interest expense, net		—			21
Other (expense) income, net		—			(505	)

(Loss) before income taxes on operations		—			(19,587	)
Income tax benefit on operations		—			15,944
Gain on divestiture		777			—
Income tax expense on disposal		(441	)		—

Income (loss) from discontinued operations	$	336		$	(3,643	)

As of March 31, 2010, there were no assets or liabilities remaining from the ~~amount~~divestiture of ~~unrecognized tax benefits that would favorably impact~~ the ~~Company’s effective income tax rate in any future periods if such benefits were recognized.~~NRB operations. Working capital adjustments associated with the sale will be finalized during 2010.

Note 15 — Fair Value

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The FASB provides accounting rules that classify the inputs used to measure fair value into the following hierarchy:


Level 1 —		Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.


	Level 2 —		Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, or unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability.


	Level 3 —		Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of ~~September 30, 2009:~~March 31, 2010:


	Fair Value at September 30, 2009								Fair Value at March 31, 2010
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3

Assets:
Available-for-sale securities	$	6,035	$	6,035	$	—	$	—	$	7,286	$	7,286	$	—	$	—
Foreign currency hedges		627		—		627		—		4,490		—		4,490		—
Interest rate swaps		992		—		992		—

Total Assets	$	7,654	$	6,035	$	1,619	$	—	$	11,776	$	7,286	$	4,490	$	—

Liabilities:
Foreign currency hedges	$	7,159	$	—	$	7,159	$	—	$	7,710	$	—	$	7,710	$	—

Total Liabilities	$	7,159	$	—	$	7,159	$	—	$	7,710	$	—	$	7,710	$	—

The Company uses publicly available foreign currency forward and spot rates to measure the fair value of its foreign currency forward contracts. ~~The Company’s interest rate swaps are remeasured each period using observable market interest rates.~~

The Company does not believe it has significant concentrations of risk associated with the ~~counterparts~~counterparties to its financial instruments.

~~Note 15 — Fair Value (continued)~~Financial Instruments

~~The following table presents the fair value hierarchy for those assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September 30, 2009:~~

Fair Value at September 30, 2009 Total Gains
Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 (Losses)

Assets:

Long-lived assets held for sale $ 301,033 $ — $ — $ 301,033 $ (38,087 )
Long-lived assets held and used 3,537 — — 3,537 (32,515 )

Total Assets
$ 304,570 $ — $ — $ 304,570 $ (70,602 )

~~The following table presents the long-lived assets that have been adjusted to their fair value in the first nine months of 2009:~~

Carrying Fair Value Fair Value at
Value Adjustment Sept. 30, 2009

Long-lived assets held for sale:

Net assets of the NRB operations $ 334,728 $ (33,695 ) $ 301,033
Torrington campus office complex 4,392 (4,392 ) —

Total long-lived assets held for sale:
$ 339,120 $ (38,087 ) $ 301,033

Long-lived assets held and used:

Process Industries’ facilities $ 29,815 $ (27,652 ) $ 2,163
Torrington campus office complex 1,984 (1,984 ) —
Endorsia.com International AB 2,346 (1,346 ) 1,000
Other assets 1,907 (1,533 ) 374

Total long-lived assets held and used:
$ 36,052 $ (32,515 ) $ 3,537

In the first nine months of 2009, assets held for sale of $339,120 and assets held and used of $36,052 were written down to their fair value of $304,570 and impairment charges of $70,602 were included in earnings. During the third quarter, the net assets associated with the pending sale of the NRB business were reclassified to assets held for sale and adjusted for impairment and written down to their fair value of $301,033. In addition, the Company’s equity investment in Endorsia.com International AB was adjusted for impairment and written down to its fair value of $1,000.

Assets held for sale of $4,392 and assets held and used of $1,984, associated with the Company’s former Torrington campus office complex, were written down to zero and an impairment charge was recognized for the full amount. The Company recognized an impairment charge during the second quarter in anticipation of recognizing a loss on the sale of these assets sold on July 20, 2009. The Company subsequently sold the assets for a loss of $689.

Assets held and used associated with the rationalization of the Process Industries’ three Canton, Ohio bearing manufacturing facilities, with a carrying value of $29,815, were written down to their fair value of $2,163, resulting in an impairment charge of $27,652, which was included in earnings for the first nine months of 2009. In addition to the Torrington campus office complex and the rationalization of Process Industries’ facilities, a portion of assets held and used that were part of a larger group of assets and had a total carrying value of $1,907 were found to be impaired during the first nine months of 2009, resulting in an impairment charge of $1,533. A portion of these assets, with a carrying value of $128, were scrapped and written down to zero, while the remaining assets of $1,779 were written down to their fair value of $374.

With the exception of the assets held and used associated with the Torrington campus office complex, the estimated fair value was based on what the Company would receive for used machinery and equipment, if sold. Of the total impairment charge of $70,601 recognized in earnings during the first nine months of 2009, $3,923 was recognized in the first quarter of 2009, $31,707 was recognized in the second quarter of 2009 and $34,971 was recognized in the third quarter of 2009.

~~The Company has adopted the revisions to the FASB’s accounting rules regarding financial instruments.~~ The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, commercial paper, short-term borrowings and accounts payable are a reasonable estimate of their fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments. The fair value of the Company’s long-term fixed-rate debt, based on quoted market prices, was ~~$447,780~~$446,060 and ~~$339,640~~$440,090 at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, respectively. The carrying value of this debt was $454,089 and $430,610 at ~~such dates was $429,930~~March 31, 2010 and ~~$429,000~~December 31, 2009, respectively.

Note 16 — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company is exposed to certain risks relating to its ongoing business operations. The primary risks managed by using derivative instruments are commodity price risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, and interest rate risk. Forward contracts on various commodities are entered into to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of natural gas used in the Company’s manufacturing process. Forward contracts on various foreign currencies are entered into to manage the foreign currency exchange rate risk on forecasted revenue denominated in foreign currencies. Other forward exchange contracts on various foreign currencies are entered into to manage the foreign currency exchange rate risk associated with certain of the Company’s commitments denominated in foreign currencies. Interest rate swaps are entered into to manage interest rate risk associated with the Company’s fixed and floating-rate borrowings.

The Company designates certain foreign currency forward contracts as cash flow hedges of forecasted revenues, and certain interest rate hedges as fair value hedges of fixed-rate borrowings. The majority of the Company’s natural gas forward contracts are not subject to any hedge designation as they are considered within the normal purchases exemption.

The Company does not purchase or hold any derivative financial instruments for trading purposes.

As of ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company had ~~$208,204~~$264,415 of outstanding foreign currency forward contracts at notional value. The total notional value of foreign currency hedges as of December 31, ~~2008~~2009 was ~~$239,415.~~$248,035.

Note 16 — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)

Cash Flow Hedging Strategy

For certain derivative instruments that are designated as and qualify as cash flow hedges (i.e., hedging the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows that is attributable to a particular risk), the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. The remaining gain or loss on the derivative instrument in excess of the cumulative change in the present value of future cash flows of the hedged item, if any (i.e., the ineffective portion), or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness, are recognized in the Consolidated Statement of Income during the current period.

To protect against a reduction in the value of forecasted foreign currency cash flows resulting from export sales over the next year, the Company has instituted a foreign currency cash flow hedging program. The Company hedges portions of its forecasted intra-group revenue or expense denominated in foreign currencies with forward contracts. When the dollar strengthens significantly against the foreign currencies, the decline in the present value of future foreign currency revenue is offset by gains in the fair value of the forward contracts designated as hedges. Conversely, when the dollar weakens, the increase in the present value of future foreign currency cash flows is offset by losses in the fair value of the forward contracts.

Fair Value Hedging Strategy

For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as fair value hedges (i.e., hedging the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset or a liability or an identified portion thereof that is attributable to a particular risk), the gain or loss on the derivative instrument, as well as the offsetting loss or gain on the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, are recognized in the same line item associated with the hedged item (i.e., in “interest expense” when the hedged item is fixed-rate debt).

~~Note 16 — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)~~

The following table presents the fair value and location of all assets and liabilities associated with the Company’s hedging instruments within the unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet:


		Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives					Asset Derivatives				Liability Derivatives
	Balance Sheet	Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value		Balance Sheet	Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value		Fair Value
	Location	at 9/30/09		at 12/31/08		at 9/30/09		at 12/31/08		Location	at 3/31/10		at 12/31/09		at 3/31/10		at 12/31/09

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments

Foreign currency forward contracts	Other non-current liabilities	$	390	$	4,398	$	3,708	$	7,635	Other non-current liabilities	$	1,922	$	675	$	761	$	1,849
Interest rate swaps	Other non-current assets		992		2,357		—		—
Natural gas forward contracts	Other current assets		—		1,559		—		—

Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		$	1,382	$	8,314	$	3,708	$	7,635		$	1,922	$	675	$	761	$	1,849

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments (a)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

Foreign currency forward contracts	Other non-current assets/liabilities	$	237	$	1,786	$	3,451	$	3,218	Other non-current assets/liabilities	$	2,568	$	1,976	$	6,949	$	4,004


Total derivatives		$	1,619	$	10,100	$	7,159	$	10,853		$	4,490	$	2,651	$	7,710	$	5,853

Note 16 — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)

The following tables present the impact of derivative instruments and their location within the unaudited Consolidated Statement of Income:


		Amount of gain or (loss)						Amount of gain or (loss)
		recognized in income						recognized in
		on derivative						income on derivative							Amount of gain or (loss)
	Location of gain or	Three Months			Three Months			Nine Months			Nine Months			Location of gain or	recognized in income
Derivatives in fair value	(loss) recognized in	Ended			Ended			Ended			Ended			(loss) recognized in	on derivative
hedging relationships	income on derivative	Sept. 30, 2009			Sept. 30, 2008			Sept. 30, 2009			Sept. 30, 2008			income on derivative	March 31, 2010		March 31, 2009


Interest rate swaps	Interest expense	$	(776	)	$	203		$	(1,364	)	$	232		Interest expense	$	—	$	(706	)
Natural gas forward contracts	Other income (expense)		—			(627	)		(1,559	)		(1,075	)	Other (expense) income, net		—		(1,326	)

Total		$	(776	)	$	(424	)	$	(2,923	)	$	(843	)		$	—	$	(2,032	)


		Amount of gain or (loss)					Amount of gain or (loss)
		recognized in income					recognized in
		on derivative					income on derivative						Amount of gain or (loss)
Hedged items in	Location of gain or	Three Months		Three Months			Nine Months		Nine Months			Location of gain or	recognized in income
fair value hedge	(loss) recognized in	Ended		Ended			Ended		Ended
fair value hedging												(loss) recognized in	on derivative
relationships	income on derivative	Sept. 30, 2009		Sept. 30, 2008			Sept. 30, 2009		Sept. 30, 2008			income on derivative	March 31, 2010		March 31, 2009


Fixed-rate debt	Interest expense	$	776	$	(203	)	$	1,364	$	(232	)	Interest expense	$	—	$	706
Natural gas	Other income (expense)		—		1,075			1,185		1,075		Other (expense) income, net		—		1,106

Total		$	776	$	872		$	2,549	$	843			$	—	$	1,812


						Amount of gain or
	Amount of gain or (loss)					(loss) reclassified from
	recognized in OCI on					AOCI into income
	derivative					(effective portion)
	March 31,					March 31,
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships	2010		2009			2010		2009


Foreign currency forward contracts	$	1,554	$	(299	)	$	880	$	806

Total	$	1,554	$	(299	)	$	880	$	806


		Amount of gain or (loss)
		recognized in income on
Derivatives not	Location of gain or	derivative
designated as	(loss) recognized in	March 31,
hedging instruments	income on derivative	2010			2009


Foreign currency forward contracts	Cost of sales	$	(28	)	$	(88	)
Foreign currency forward contracts	Other (expense) income, net		(2,324	)		1,394

Total		$	(2,352	)	$	1,306

~~Note 16 — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (continued)~~

Amount of gain or
Amount of gain or (loss) (loss) reclassified from
recognized in OCI on AOCI into income
derivative (effective portion)
Three Months Ended Three Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships 2009 2008 2009 2008

Foreign currency forward contracts $ 662 $ (4,613 ) $ (1,631 ) $ (227 )

Total
$ 662 $ (4,613 ) $ (1,631 ) $ (227 )

Amount of gain or (loss)
Amount of gain or reclassified from AOCI
(loss) recognized in into income (effective
OCI on derivative portion)
Nine Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships 2009 2008 2009 2008

Foreign currency forward contracts $ 250 $ (4,761 ) $ (1,670 ) $ (200 )

Total
$ 250 $ (4,761 ) $ (1,670 ) $ (200 )

Amount of gain or (loss) Amount of gain or (loss)
recognized in income on recognized in income on
derivative derivative
Derivatives not Location of gain or Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
designated as (loss) recognized in September 30, September 30,
hedging instruments income on derivative 2009 2008 2009 2008

Foreign currency forward contracts Cost of sales $ 20 $ (29 ) $ 54 $ (5 )
Foreign currency forward contracts Other income (expense) (4,405 ) 658 (1,837 ) 924

Total
$ (4,385 ) $ 629 $ (1,783 ) $ 919

~~Note 17 — Prior Period Adjustments~~

During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded two adjustments related to its 2008 Consolidated Financial Statements. In the first quarter of 2009, Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest increased by $6,100 (after-tax) due to a correction of an error related to the $48,765 goodwill impairment loss the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the Mobile Industries segment. In recording the goodwill impairment loss in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company did not fully recognize that a portion of the goodwill impairment loss related to two separate subsidiaries in which the Company holds less than 100% ownership.

In addition, (Loss) Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes decreased by $3,400 ($2,044 after-tax) due to a correction of an error related to $3,400 of in-process research and development costs that were recorded in Other current assets with the anticipation of being paid for by a third-party. However, the Company subsequently realized that the balance could not be substantiated through a contract with a third-party.

As a result of these errors, the Company’s 2008 results were understated by $4,056, and the Company’s first quarter 2009 results were overstated by the same amount. Management of the Company concluded the effect of the first quarter adjustments was immaterial to the Company’s 2008 and first quarter 2009 financial statements, as well as the projected full-year 2009 financial statements.

~~Note~~ 18 ~~— Divestitures~~

On July 29, 2009, the Company announced it had signed an agreement to sell the assets of its NRB operations to JTEKT Corporation. Upon closing of the transaction, which is expected to occur by the end of 2009 subject to customary regulatory approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of other closing conditions, the Company will receive approximately $330,000 in cash proceeds for these operations (including certain receivables to be retained by the Company), subject to working capital adjustments. The NRB operations primarily serve the automotive original-equipment market sectors and manufacture highly engineered needle roller bearings, including an extensive range of radial and thrust needle roller bearings, as well as bearing assemblies and loose needles, for automotive and industrial applications. The NRB operations have facilities in the United States, Canada, Europe and China. The NRB operations had 2008 sales of approximately $620,000 and were previously included in the Company’s Mobile Industries, Process Industries and Aerospace and Defense reportable segments. The Mobile Industries segment accounted for approximately 80% of the 2008 sales of the NRB operations.

The results of operations were reclassified as Discontinued Operations during the third quarter of 2009 as the NRB operations met all the criteria for discontinued operations, including assets held for sale. Previous results for 2009 and 2008 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation under Discontinued Operations. The Company incurred a pretax impairment loss of $33,695 during the third quarter of 2009 as the projected proceeds from the sale of NRB operations were lower than the net book value of the net assets expected to be transferred as a result of sale of the NRB operations to JTEKT Corporation.

~~The following results of operations for this business have been treated as discontinued operations for all periods presented.~~

Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended
September 30, September 30,
2009 2008 2009 2008

Net sales $ 103,025 $ 146,332 $ 288,953 $ 510,055
Gross profit 13,112 25,215 4,087 88,005
Impairment and restructuring charges 48,592 950 53,790 563
(Loss) income from discontinued operations $ (30,803 ) $ 6,539 $ (59,912 ) $ 26,099

~~Note 18 — Divestitures (continued)~~

~~The following presentation shows the assets and liabilities of discontinued operations for the periods presented:~~

September 30, 2009 December 31, 2008

Assets:
Accounts receivable, net $ 25,799 $ 33,482
Inventories 114,827 145,201
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses 399 2,782
Other current assets 2,154 1,396
Property, plant and equipment — net 193,263 226,895
Goodwill — 8,614
Other intangible assets 26,638 32,806
Other non-current assets 1,414 1,310

Total assets, discontinued operations $ 364,494 $ 452,486

Liabilities:
Accounts payable and other liabilities $ 16,757 $ 19,907
Salaries, wages and benefits 1,680 1,605
Accrued pension cost 15,790 14,026
Deferred income taxes 1,848 1,848
Other non-current liabilities 8,106 7,986

Total liabilities, discontinued operations $ 44,181 $ 45,372

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income related to the net assets of the NRB operations included in the Company’s Equity at September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 was $19,280 and $9,944, respectively. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income was factored in when the Company recorded the impairment loss of $33,695.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

Introduction

The Timken Company is a leading global manufacturer of highly engineered anti-friction bearings and assemblies, high-quality alloy steels and aerospace power transmission systems as well as a provider of related products and services. The Company operates under two business groups: the Steel Group and the Bearings and Power Transmission Group. The Bearings and Power Transmission Group is composed of three operating segments: (1) Mobile Industries, (2) Process Industries and (3) Aerospace and Defense. These three operating segments and the Steel Group comprise the Company’s four reportable segments.

The Mobile Industries segment provides bearings, power transmission components and related products and services. Customers of the Mobile Industries segment include original equipment manufacturers and suppliers for passenger cars, light trucks, medium and heavy-duty trucks, rail cars, locomotives and agricultural, construction and mining equipment. Customers also include aftermarket distributors of automotive products. The Company’s strategy for the Mobile Industries segment is to improve financial performance byin the automotive and truck original-equipment markets while leveraging more attractive markets in the rail and off-highway sectors and in the aftermarket. This strategy could result in allocating assets to serve the most attractive market sectors and restructuring or exiting those businesses where adequate returns cannot be achieved over the long-term.

The Process Industries segment provides bearings, power transmission components and related products and services. Customers of the Process Industries segment include original equipment manufacturers of power transmission, energy and heavy industries machinery and equipment including rolling mills, cement and aggregate processing equipment, paper mills, sawmills, printing presses, cranes, hoists, drawbridges, wind energy turbines, gear drives, drilling equipment, coal conveyors and crushers and food processing equipment. Customers also include aftermarket distributors of products other than those for steel and automotive applications. The Company’s strategy for the Process Industries segment is to pursue growth in selected industrial market sectors, ~~and in~~including the aftermarket, and to achieve a leadership position in Asia. In December 2007, the Company announced the establishment of a joint venture, Timken XEMC (Hunan) Bearings Co., Ltd., to manufacture ultra-large-bore bearings for the growing Chinese wind energy market. In October 2008, the joint venture broke ground on a new wind energy plant to be built in China. Bearings produced at this facility are expected to be available in 2010. In October 2008, the Company announced that it would expand production at its Tyger River facility in Union, South Carolina to make ultra-large-bore bearings to serve wind-turbine manufacturers in North America.

The Aerospace and Defense segment manufactures bearings, helicopter transmission systems, rotor head assemblies, turbine engine components, gears and other precision flight-critical components for commercial and military aviation applications. The Aerospace and Defense segment also provides aftermarket services, including repair and overhaul of engines, transmissions and fuel controls, as well as aerospace bearing repair and component reconditioning. In addition, the Aerospace and Defense segment manufactures precision bearings, higher-level assemblies and sensors for ~~original~~ equipment manufacturers of health and positioning control equipment. The Company’s strategy for the Aerospace and Defense segment is to: (1) grow by adding power transmission parts, assemblies and services, utilizing a platform approach; (2) develop new aftermarket channels; and (3) ~~add core bearing capacity~~improve global capabilities through manufacturing initiatives in North America and China. In November 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of EXTEX Ltd. (EXTEX), located in Gilbert, Arizona. EXTEX is a leading designer and marketer of high-quality replacement engine parts for the aerospace aftermarket.initiatives.

The Steel segment manufactures more than 450 grades of carbon and alloy steel, which are produced in both solid and tubular sections with a variety of lengths and finishes. The Steel segment also manufactures custom-made steel products for both industrial and automotive applications. The Company’s strategy for the Steel segment is to ~~focus~~drive profitable growth by focusing on opportunities where the Company can offer differentiated capabilities while driving profitable growth. In November 2008, the Company opened a new small-bar steel rolling mill to expand its portfolio of differentiated steel products. The new mill enables the Company to competitively produce steel bars down to 1-inch diameter for use in power transmission and friction management applications for a variety of customers, including foreign automakers. In February 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of Boring Specialties, Inc. (BSI), a provider of a wide range of precision deep-hole oil and gas drilling and extraction products and services.capabilities.

In addition to specific segment initiatives, the Company has been making strategic investments in business processes and systems. Project O.N.E. is a multi-year program ~~which began~~launched in 2005 ~~designed~~ to improve the Company’s business processes and systems. ~~The~~In total, the Company expects to invest up to approximately ~~$210 million to~~ $220 million, which includes internal and external costs, to implement Project O.N.E. As of ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company has incurred costs of approximately ~~$209.1~~$211.4 million, of which approximately ~~$118.8~~$124.2 million have been capitalized to the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The total costs incurred were reduced from prior disclosure due to the removal of post-implementation expenses that were not part of the project. During 2008 and 2007, the Company completed the installation of Project O.N.E. for the majority of the Company’s domestic Bearings and Power Transmission Group operations and a major portion of its European operations. On April 1, 2009, the Company completed ~~the next~~an additional installation of Project O.N.E. for the majority of the Company’s remaining European operations as well as certain other facilities in North America and India. ~~With the completion of the April 2009 installation of Project O.N.E., approximately 80% of the Bearings and Power Transmission Group’s global sales flow through the new system.~~ The ~~next~~final installation of Project O.N.E. is expected to be completed in ~~April~~May 2010.

~~Management’s Discussion~~ With the completion of the May 2010 installation of Project O.N.E., approximately 90% of the Bearings and ~~Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)~~Power Transmission Group’s global sales will flow through the new system.

On ~~July 29,~~December 31, 2009, the Company ~~announced it had signed an agreement to sell~~completed the sale of the assets of its Needle Roller Bearings (NRB) operations to JTEKT ~~Corporation. Upon closing of the transaction, which is expected to occur by the end of 2009 subject to customary regulatory approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of other closing conditions, the~~Corporation (JTEKT). The Company ~~will receive~~received approximately ~~$330~~$304 million in cash proceeds for these operations ~~(including~~and retained certain receivables, ~~to be retained by the Company),~~ subject to post-sale working capital adjustments. The NRB operations manufacture ~~highly engineered~~ needle roller bearings, including ~~an extensive~~a range of radial and thrust needle roller bearings, as well as bearing assemblies and loose needles for automotive and industrial applications. The NRB operations ~~have facilities in the United States, Canada, Europe and China. The NRB operations~~ had ~~2008~~2009 sales of approximately ~~$620~~$407 million and approximately 80% of these sales were previously included in the Company’s Mobile Industries segment with the remainder included in the Process Industries and Aerospace and Defense reportable segments. ~~The Mobile Industries segment accounted~~Results for ~~approximately 80 percent of the 2008 sales of the NRB operations. The results of operations were reclassified as Discontinued Operations during the third quarter of~~ 2009 asfor the NRB operations ~~met all the criteria for~~are presented as discontinued ~~operations, including assets held for sale. Previous results for 2009 and 2008 have been reclassified to conform to the presentation under Discontinued Operations.~~operations. The Company incurred ~~a pretax impairment~~an after-tax loss of approximately $33.7 million during the third quarter of 2009 as the projected proceeds from the sale of NRB operations were lower than net book value of the net assets expected to be transferred as a result of sale of the NRB operations to JTEKT Corporation. Refer to Note 18 — Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.

~~Financial Overview~~

Overview:

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change % Change

(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share)
Net sales $ 763.6 $ 1,336.4 $ (572.8 ) (42.9 )%
(Loss) income from continuing operations (18.9 ) 125.0 (143.9 ) (115.1 )%
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (30.8 ) 6.5 (37.3 ) (573.8 )%
Income attributable to noncontrolling interest 0.4 1.1 (0.7 ) (63.6 )%
Net (loss) income attributable to The Timken Company (50.1 ) 130.4 (180.5 ) (138.4 )%

Diluted (loss) earnings per share:
Continuing operations $ (0.20 ) $ 1.28 $ (1.48 ) (115.6 )%
Discontinued operations (0.32 ) 0.07 (0.39 ) (557.1 )%
Diluted (loss) earnings per share $ (0.52 ) $ 1.35 $ (1.87 ) (138.7 )%
Average number of shares — diluted 96,176,091 96,103,130 — 0.1 %

YTD 2009 YTD 2008 $ Change % Change

(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share)
Net sales $ 2,367.0 $ 3,942.8 $ (1,575.8 ) (40.0 )%
(Loss) income from continuing operations (58.8 ) 280.7 (339.5 ) (120.9 )%
(Loss) income from discontinued operations (59.9 ) 26.1 (86.0 ) NM
(Loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest (4.9 ) 3.0 (7.9 ) (263.3 )%
Net (loss) income attributable to The Timken Company (113.8 ) 303.8 (417.6 ) (137.5 )%

Diluted (loss) earnings per share:
Continuing operations $ (0.56 ) $ 2.87 $ (3.43 ) (119.5 )%
Discontinued operations (0.62 ) 0.27 (0.89 ) (329.6 )%
Diluted (loss) earnings per share $ (1.18 ) $ 3.14 $ (4.32 ) (137.6 )%
Average number of shares — diluted 96,111,847 95,968,659 — 0.1 %

Net sales for the third quarter of 2009 were approximately $0.76 billion, compared to $1.34 billion in the third quarter of 2008, a decrease of 42.9%. Net sales for the first nine months of 2009 were approximately $2.37 billion, compared to $3.94 billion in the first nine months of 2008, a decrease of 40.0%. Sales were lower across all business segments for the third quarter of 2009. Sales for the first nine months of 2009 were lower across all business segments except for the Aerospace and Defense segment. The decrease in sales was primarily driven by lower volume and lower surcharges in the Steel segment, partially offset by the impact of favorable pricing.

The Company’s third quarter and first nine months results reflect the deterioration of most market sectors as a result of the current global economic downturn. The impact of lower volume and higher restructuring charges, as a result of actions taken to align the Company’s businesses with current demand, was partially offset by lower raw material costs and lower selling and administrative costs. Additionally, the Company’s results from continuing operations for the first nine months of 2008 reflected a pretax gain of $20.2$12.6 million on the sale of the ~~Company’s former seamless steel tube manufacturing facility located in Desford, England.~~NRB operations during the fourth quarter of 2009.

2619

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)


Overview:
	1Q 2010		1Q 2009			$ Change		% Change

(Dollars in millions, except earnings per share)
Net sales	$	913.7	$	866.6		$	47.1		5.4	%
Income (loss) from continuing operations		28.7		(1.4	)		30.1	NM
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		0.3		(3.6	)		3.9		108.3	%
Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest		0.4		(5.9	)		6.3		106.8	%
Net income attributable to The Timken Company		28.6		0.9			27.7	NM

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Continuing operations	$	0.29	$	0.05		$	0.24	NM
Discontinued operations		0.01		(0.04	)		0.05		125.0	%
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.30	$	0.01		$	0.29	NM
Average number of shares — diluted		96,700,256		96,028,860			—		0.7	%

The Timken Company reported net sales for the first quarter of 2010 of $913.7 million, compared to $866.6 million in the first quarter of 2009, an increase of 5.4%. Higher sales were driven by improved demand from automotive markets across the Mobile Industries and Steel segments, as well as higher surcharges, partially offset by lower sales in the Process Industries and Aerospace and Defense segments. For the first quarter of 2010, net income per diluted share was $0.30 compared to $0.01 per diluted share for the first quarter of 2009. Income from continuing operations per diluted share for the first quarter of 2010 was $0.29 compared to $0.05 per diluted share for the first quarter of 2009.

The Company’s first quarter results reflect the improvement in the mobile market sectors, higher surcharges, improved manufacturing performance and the favorable impact of restructuring initiatives, partially offset by lower demand from industrial and aerospace markets, higher LIFO expense and higher expense related to incentive compensation plans. Results for the first quarter of 2010 also reflect a one-time charge of $21.6 million to record the deferred tax impact of recently-enacted U.S. health care legislation.

Outlook

The Company’s outlook for ~~2009~~2010 reflects a modest improvement in the global economy following the deteriorating global economic climate that ~~is expected~~occurred throughout 2009. The Company expects sales in 2010 to ~~last through~~be approximately 20% to 25% higher than 2009, primarily driven by stronger sales volume and higher surcharges in the ~~remainder of~~Steel segment, as well as higher sales from the ~~year, impacting most of the Company’s market sectors. Lower sales, compared to 2008, are expected~~Mobile and Process Industries segments, offset by a slight decline in ~~all business segments except for~~ the Aerospace and Defense segment. ~~A significant portion of the decrease~~The Company expects to leverage increases in ~~Steel segment~~ sales ~~is expected to~~through improved operating performance and its 2009 cost reduction initiatives. The strengthening margins will be due to lower surcharges to recover raw material and energy costs, which were at historically high levels during the middle of 2008, but declined dramatically towards the end of 2008. The Company’s results will continue to reflect lower margins as a result of the lower volume and surcharges, partially offset by ~~improved pricing, lower raw material costs and lower selling, administrative and general expenses. In the first quarter of 2009, the Company announced that it planned~~higher expense related to eliminate approximately 400 sales and administrative salaried positions and implement other cost savings initiatives that are targeted to save approximately $80 million in annual selling and administrative expenses.incentive compensation plans.

The Company expects to continue to generate cash from operations ~~for the full year of 2009~~in 2010 as a result of ~~working capital reductions and lower income taxes, partially offset by~~ higher ~~pension contributions.~~earnings in 2010, compared to 2009. In addition, the Company expects to ~~reduce~~increase capital expenditures by approximately ~~50%~~20% in ~~2009,~~2010 compared to ~~2008.~~

~~The Statement~~2009. Pension contributions are also expected to increase to approximately $135 million in 2010, including over $100 million of ~~Income~~

Sales by Segment:

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)
Mobile Industries $ 327.6 $ 426.5 $ (98.9 ) (23.2 )%
Process Industries 186.4 316.9 (130.5 ) (41.2 )%
Aerospace and Defense 100.2 104.7 (4.5 ) (4.3 )%
Steel 149.4 488.3 (338.9 ) (69.4 )%

Total Company $ 763.6 $ 1,336.4 $ (572.8 ) (42.9 )%

YTD 2009 YTD 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)
Mobile Industries $ 920.4 $ 1,397.6 $ (477.2 ) (34.1 )%
Process Industries 616.9 895.6 (278.7 ) (31.1 )%
Aerospace and Defense 318.7 302.2 16.5 5.5 %
Steel 511.0 1,347.4 (836.4 ) (62.1 )%

Total Company $ 2,367.0 $ 3,942.8 $ (1,575.8 ) (40.0 )%

~~Net sales for the third quarter of 2009 decreased $572.8 million, or 42.9%,~~discretionary U.S. contributions, compared to ~~the third quarter of 2008, primarily due to lower volume of approximately $420~~$65 million ~~across all business segments, lower surcharges~~ in the Steel segment of approximately $215 million and the effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes of approximately $15 million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $55 million.

Net sales for the first nine months of 2009 decreased $1.58 billion, or 40.0%, compared to the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to lower volume of approximately $1.2 billion across all business segments, except for the Aerospace and Defense segment, lower surcharges in the Steel segment of approximately $475 million and the effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes of approximately $145 million. These decreases were partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $180 million.2009.

2720

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Gross Profit:

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)
Gross profit $ 129.6 $ 381.5 $ (251.9 ) (66.0 )%
Gross profit % to net sales 17.0 % 28.6 % — (1,160 ) bps
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold $ 1.0 $ 0.3 $ 0.7 NM

YTD 2009 YTD 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)
Gross profit $ 409.5 $ 974.0 $ (564.5 ) (58.0 )%
Gross profit % to net sales 17.3 % 24.7 % — (740 ) bps
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold $ 3.6 $ 1.8 $ 1.8 100.0 %

The Statement of Income

~~Gross profit decreased in~~


Sales by Segment:
	1Q 2010		1Q 2009		$ Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions, and exclude intersegment sales)
Mobile Industries	$	367.5	$	300.6	$	66.9			22.3	%
Process Industries		205.9		224.2		(18.3	)		(8.2	)%
Aerospace and Defense		92.1		109.3		(17.2	)		(15.7	)%
Steel		248.2		232.5		15.7			6.8	%

Total Company	$	913.7	$	866.6	$	47.1			5.4	%

Net sales for the ~~third~~first quarter of 2010 increased $47.1 million, or 5.4%, compared to the first quarter of 2009, ~~compared to the third quarter of 2008,~~primarily due to ~~the impact of lower sales~~higher volume ~~across most market sectors~~ of approximately ~~$190~~$30 million ~~lower surcharges in~~primarily across the Mobile Industries’ light vehicles market sector and the Steel business segment, higher surcharges of ~~$215~~$22 million and ~~higher manufacturing costs~~the effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes of approximately ~~$50~~$20 million, partially offset by ~~lower raw material costs of approximately $195 million, improved~~unfavorable pricing and sales mix of approximately ~~$20 million and lower logistics costs of approximately $30~~$25 million. The higher manufacturing costs were primarily driven by the Mobile Industries and Steel segments as a result of the underutilization of plant capacity. The lower raw material costs are primarily due to lower scrap steel costs as scrap steel and other raw material costs have fallen in 2009 from historically high levels in 2008.


Gross Profit:
	1Q 2010			1Q 2009			$ Change		Change

(Dollars in millions)
Gross profit	$	222.7		$	154.6		$	68.1		44.0	%
Gross profit % to net sales		24.4	%		17.8	%		—	660		bps
Rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold	$	1.2		$	1.2		$	—		0.0	%

Gross profit ~~decreased~~margin increased in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009,~~2010 compared to the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2008,~~2009 primarily due to ~~the impact of~~better manufacturing utilization and lower ~~sales volume across most market sectors of approximately $445 million, lower surcharges in the Steel segment of $475 million and higher~~ manufacturing costs of approximately ~~$250~~$45 million, the timing of surcharges of approximately $22 million and the impact of higher sales volume of approximately $10 million, partially offset by ~~lower raw material costs~~higher LIFO expense of ~~approximately $400 million, improved pricing and sales mix of approximately $145 million and lower logistics costs of approximately $85~~$18 million.

In the ~~third quarter~~first quarters of 2010 and ~~the first nine months of~~ 2009, rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold primarily related to the continued rationalization of Process Industries’ Canton, Ohio bearing manufacturing facilities. In the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, rationalization expenses included in cost of products sold primarily related to certain Mobile Industries’ domestic manufacturing facilities, the closure of the Company’s seamless steel tube manufacturing operations located in Desford, England and the continued rationalization of Process Industries’ Canton, Ohio bearing manufacturing facilities. Rationalization expenses in the ~~respective periods~~first quarter of 2010 primarily consisted of relocation of equipment. Rationalization expenses in the first quarter of 2009 ~~and 2008~~ primarily consisted of accelerated depreciation and relocation of equipment.


Selling, Administrative and General Expenses:													Selling, Administrative and General Expenses:

	3Q 2009			3Q 2008			$ Change			Change				1Q 2010			1Q 2009			$ Change			Change

(Dollars in millions)
Selling, administrative and general expenses	$	107.2		$	176.5		$	(69.3	)		(39.3	)%		$	133.1		$	123.4		$	9.7			7.9	%
Selling, administrative and general expenses % to net sales		14.0	%		13.2	%		—			80	bps			14.6	%		14.2	%		—		40		bps
Rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative and general expenses	$	0.5		$	(0.4	)	$	0.9		NM				$	0.2		$	0.3		$	(0.1	)		(33.3	)%



	YTD 2009			YTD 2008			$ Change			Change

(Dollars in millions)
Selling, administrative and general expenses	$	358.7		$	517.6		$	(158.9	)		(30.7	)%
Selling, administrative and general expenses % to net sales		15.2	%		13.1	%		—			210	bps
Rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative and general expenses	$	1.6		$	1.7		$	(0.1	)		(5.9	)%

The decrease in selling, administrative and general expenses in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, was primarily due to restructuring initiatives and lower discretionary spending on items such as travel and professional fees of approximately $45 million and lower performance-based compensation of approximately $20 million. The decreaseincrease in selling, administrative and general expenses in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009,~~2010, compared to the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2008,~~2009, was primarily due to ~~restructuring initiatives and lower discretionary spending on items such as travel and professional fees~~higher expense related to incentive compensation plans of approximately ~~$100~~$20 million, ~~lower performance-based compensation of approximately $40 million and lower bad debt expense~~partially offset by savings from restructuring initiatives of approximately $15 million.

2821

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

In the third quarter and first nine months of 2009, the rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative and general expenses primarily related to exit costs for associates exiting the Company. In the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, the rationalization expenses included in selling, administrative and general expenses primarily related to the rationalization of the Process Industries’ Canton, Ohio bearing facilities and costs associated with vacating the Torrington, Connecticut office complex.


Impairment and Restructuring Charges:								Impairment and Restructuring Charges:

	3Q 2009		3Q 2008		$ Change				1Q 2010		1Q 2009		$ Change

(Dollars in millions)
Impairment charges	$	—	$	—	$	—			$	—	$	3.8	$	(3.8	)
Severance and related benefit costs		18.8		0.5		18.3				5.0		9.4		(4.4	)
Exit costs		0.8		1.9		(1.1	)			0.5		0.6		(0.1	)

Total	$	19.6	$	2.4	$	17.2			$	5.5	$	13.8	$	(8.3	)



	YTD 2009		YTD 2008		$ Change

(Dollars in millions)
Impairment charges	$	34.8	$	0.1	$	34.7
Severance and related benefit costs		46.3		3.7		42.6
Exit costs		3.0		3.7		(0.7	)

Total	$	84.1	$	7.5	$	76.6

The following discussion explains the major impairment and restructuring charges recorded for the periods presented; however, it is not intended to reflect a comprehensive discussion of all amounts in the tables above. See Note 1211 — Impairment and Restructuring in the Notes to the Consolidated Financials for further details by segment.

Selling and Administrative ~~Cost~~ Reductions

In March 2009, the Company announced the realignment of its organization to improve efficiency and reduce costs as a result of the economic downturn. The Company had targeted pretax savings of approximately $30 million to $40 million in annual selling and administrative costs. In April 2009, in light of the Company’s revised forecast indicating significantly reduced sales and earnings for the year, the Company expanded the target to approximately $80 million. ~~The implementation of these savings began in the first quarter of 2009 and is expected to be substantially completed by the end of the fourth quarter of 2009, with full-year savings expected to be~~This target was achieved in 2010. As the Company streamlines its operating structure, it expects to cut up to 400 sales and administrative associate positions in 2009, incurring severance costs of approximately $15 million to $20 million.2009. During the first ~~nine months~~quarters of 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded ~~$10.6~~$1.3 million and $2.3 million, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs related to this initiative to eliminate approximately ~~270 associates.~~25 associates and 26 associates, respectively. Of the ~~$10.6~~$1.3 million charge ~~for~~recorded during the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2010, $0.6 million related to Corporate, $0.4 million related to the Process Industries segment and $0.3 million related to the Mobile Industries segment. Of the $2.3 million charge recorded during the first quarter of 2009, ~~$4.5~~$1.2 million related to Corporate, $0.5 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, ~~$1.9~~$0.4 million related to the Steel segment and $0.2 million related to the Process Industries segment. Overall, the Company has eliminated approximately 500 sales and administrative associates in 2009 and 2010 with a pretax savings of approximately $55 million.

Manufacturing Workforce Reductions

During the first quarter of 2010, the Company recorded $3.3 million in severance and related benefit costs to eliminate approximately 60 associates to properly align its business as a result of the continued downturn in the economy and expected market demand. Of the $3.3 million charge, $1.6 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $1.2 million related to the Process Industries segment ~~$0.6~~and $0.5 million related to the Aerospace and Defense ~~segment, $1.5 million related to the Steel segment and $2.1 million related to Corporate.~~

~~Manufacturing Workforce Reductions~~

segment. During the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of 2009, the Company recorded ~~$13.6~~$6.5 million ~~and $28.8 million, respectively,~~ in severance and related benefit costs, including a curtailment of pension benefits of ~~$1.6~~$1.8 million, ~~for the first nine months of 2009,~~ to eliminate approximately ~~3,000~~800 associates to properly align its business as a result of the ~~current~~continued downturn in the economy and expected market demand. Of the ~~$13.6~~$6.5 million charge, ~~$10.3~~$5.7 million related to the Mobile Industries segment ~~$2.3~~and $0.8 million related to the Process Industries ~~segment and $1.0 million related to the Aerospace and Defense~~ segment. Of the $28.8 million charge, $20.6 million related to the Mobile Industries segment, $4.8 million related to the Process Industries segment, $1.7 million related to the Aerospace and Defense segment and $1.7 million related to the Steel segment.

~~Bearings and Power Transmission Reorganization~~

In August 2007, the Company announced the realignment of its management structure. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company began to operate under two major business groups: the Steel Group and the Bearings and Power Transmission Group. The Bearings and Power Transmission Group includes three reportable segments: Mobile Industries, Process Industries and Aerospace and Defense. The Company realized pretax savings of approximately $18 million in 2008 as a result of these changes. During the first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded $1.9 million of severance and related benefit costs related to this initiative. The majority of the severance charge related to the Mobile segment.

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)~~

~~Torrington Campus~~

On July 20, 2009, the Company sold the remaining portion of its Torrington, Connecticut office complex. In anticipation of the loss that the Company expected to record upon completion of the sale of the office complex, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $6.4 million during the second quarter of 2009. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded an additional loss of approximately $0.7 million in Other (expense) income, net on the sale of the remaining portion of this office complex.

Mobile Industries

In March 2007, the Company announced the ~~planned~~ closure of its manufacturing facility in Sao Paulo, Brazil. The Company completed the closure of this ~~manufacturing~~ facility ~~was subsequently delayed to serve higher customer demand. However, with the current downturn in the economy, the Company believes it will close this facility before the end of~~on March 31, 2010. This closure is targeted to deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $5 million, with expected pretax costs of approximately $25 million to $30 million, which includes restructuring costs and rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses. ~~Due to the delay in the closure of this manufacturing facility, the~~The Company expects to realize the $5 million of annual pretax savings ~~before~~by the end of ~~2010, once this facility closes.~~2010. Mobile Industries has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately ~~$22.0~~$25.3 million as of ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 related to this closure. During the ~~third~~first quarter of 2010 and ~~first nine months of~~ 2009, the Company recorded ~~$1.3~~$0.3 million and ~~$2.5~~$0.6 million, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs ~~and exit costs of $0.7 million and $1.5 million, respectively,~~ associated with the planned closure of the Company’s Sao Paulo, Brazil manufacturing facility. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded $0.6 million and $1.6 million, respectively, of severance and related benefit costs and exit costs of $0.8 million associated with the planned closure of the Company’s Sao Paulo, Brazil manufacturing facility.

In addition to the above charges, the Company recorded impairment charges of ~~$0.9~~$0.8 million during the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2009 related to an impairment of fixed assets at one of its facilities in France as a result of the carrying value of these assets exceeding their expected future cash flows.

Process Industries

In May 2004, the Company announced plans to rationalize ~~its~~the Company’s three bearing plants in Canton, Ohio within the Process Industries segment. This rationalization initiative is expected to deliver annual pretax savings of approximately $35 million through streamlining operations and workforce reductions, with ~~expected~~ pretax costs of approximately $70 million to $80 million (including pretax cash costs of approximately $50 million), by the ~~end~~middle of ~~2009.~~

The Company recorded exit costs of $0.2 million during the third quarter of 2009 related to Process Industries’ rationalization plans. During the first nine months of 2009, the Company recorded impairment charges of $27.7 million and exit costs of $1.6 million. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, the Company recorded exit costs of $0.2 million and $1.6 million as a result of Process Industries’ rationalization plans. The significant impairment charge recorded during the first nine months of 2009 is a result of the rapid deterioration of the market sectors served by one of the rationalized plants resulting in the carrying value of the fixed assets for this plant exceeding their future cash flows. The Company expects to close this facility by the end of 2009. The Process Industries segment has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately $68.0 million (including approximately $25.3 million of pretax cash costs) as of September 30, 2009 for these rationalization plans, including rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses. As of September 30, 2009, the Process Industries segment has realized approximately $15 million in annual pretax savings.

In October 2009, the Company announced the consolidation of its distribution centers in Bucyrus, Ohio and Spartanburg, South Carolina into a larger, leased facility in the region surrounding the existing Spartanburg location. The closure of the Bucyrus Distribution Center will displace approximately 290 employees. During the third quarter of 2009, the Company recorded $4.5 million of severance and related benefit costs related to this closure.

~~Steel~~

In April 2007, the Company completed the closure of its seamless steel tube manufacturing facility located in Desford, England. The Company recorded $0.4 million of exit costs during the first nine months of 2008 related to this action.2010.

3022

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Rollforward of Restructuring Accruals:

Sept. 30, 2009 Dec. 31, 2008

(Dollars in millions)
Beginning balance, January 1 $ 17.0 $ 19.0
Expense 47.7 12.7
Payments (29.8 ) (14.7 )

Ending balance $ 34.9 $ 17.0

During the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded impairment charges of $3.0 million and exit costs of $0.6 million as a result of Process Industries’ rationalization plans. Including rationalization costs recorded in cost of products sold and selling, administrative and general expenses, the Process Industries segment has incurred cumulative pretax costs of approximately $69.8 million as of March 31, 2010 for these rationalization plans. As of March 31, 2010, the Process Industries segment has realized approximately $15 million in annual pretax savings.


Rollforward of Restructuring Accruals:
	March 31, 2010			Dec. 31, 2009

(Dollars in millions)
Beginning balance, January 1	$	34.0		$	17.0
Expense		5.5			55.6
Payments		(14.3	)		(38.6	)

Ending balance	$	25.2		$	34.0

The restructuring accrual at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008~~2009 is included in ~~Accounts payable and~~ other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The restructuring accrual at ~~September 30,~~December 31, 2009 excludes costs related to the curtailment of pension benefit plans of ~~$1.6~~$0.9 million. The accrual at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 includes ~~$27.5~~$18.8 million of severance and related benefits, with ~~the remainder of~~ the balance primarily representing environmental exit costs. The majority of the ~~$27.5~~$18.8 million accrual relating to severance and related benefits is expected to be paid by the ~~middle~~end of 2010. In addition to the restructuring accrual presented above, the Company has approximately $1.8 million of restructuring accruals at September 30, 2009 related to the NRB operations that will be retained by the Company. The expense related to these retained restructuring accruals has been reclassified to discontinued operations.


Interest Expense and Income:											Interest Expense and Income:

	3Q 2009		3Q 2008		$ Change			% Change				1Q 2010		1Q 2009		$ Change		% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Interest expense	$	10.3	$	11.0	$	(0.7	)		(6.4	)%		$	9.6	$	8.5	$	1.1		12.9	%
Interest income	$	0.3	$	1.4	$	(1.1	)		(78.6	)%		$	0.6	$	0.4	$	0.2		50.0	%



	YTD 2009		YTD 2008		$ Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Interest expense	$	27.2	$	33.4	$	(6.2	)		(18.6	)%
Interest income	$	1.3	$	4.3	$	(3.0	)		(69.8	)%

Interest expense for the ~~third quarter and~~ first nine months of 2009 decreased compared to the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, primarily due to lower average debt outstanding, which more than offset the impact of higher borrowing costs. Interest income for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 decreased compared to the same periods in the prior year primarily due to lower interest rates on invested cash balances.

Other Income and Expense:

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change % Change

(Dollars in millions)
(Loss) on divestitures of non-strategic assets $ (2.0 ) $ — $ (2.0 ) NM
(Loss) on dissolution of subsidiaries (0.6 ) (0.5 ) (0.1 ) (20.0 )%
Other (expense) income (1.9 ) 0.5 (2.4 ) NM

Other (expense) income, net $ (4.5 ) $ — $ (4.5 ) NM

YTD 2009 YTD 2008 $ Change % Change

(Dollars in millions)
(Loss) gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets $ (0.7 ) $ 20.5 $ (21.2 ) (103.4 )%
Gain (loss) on dissolution of subsidiaries 0.1 (0.5 ) 0.6 120.0 %
Other income (expense) 3.9 (4.2 ) 8.1 192.9 %

Other (expense) income, net $ 3.3 $ 15.8 $ (12.5 ) (79.1 )%

~~The loss on divestitures of non-strategic assets for the third~~ quarter of 2009 reflects an impairment loss on the Company’s joint venture, Endorsia.com International AB, of $1.3 million and a loss of $0.7 million on the sale of the remaining portion of the Company’s former office complex located in Torrington, Connecticut. For the first nine months of 2009, this impairment loss is offset by a gain of $0.6 million on the sale of the Company’s former office complex located in Torrington, Connecticut. The sale of the Torrington office complex occurred in two separate transactions; one in2010 increased compared to the first quarter of 2009, ~~resulting in a gain~~primarily due to the amortization of ~~$1.3 million~~deferred financing costs associated with the refinancing of the Company’s Senior Credit Facility and the ~~other~~issuance of $250 million of fixed-rate 6% unsecured Senior Notes in the third quarter of 2009 ~~resulting~~and lower capitalized interest, partially offset by lower interest expense at non-U.S. affiliates due to lower debt levels. Interest income for the first quarter of 2010 increased compared to the same period in the ~~loss of $0.7 million mentioned above.~~ prior year, due to higher invested cash balances.


Other Income and Expense:
	1Q 2010			1Q 2009		$ Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Other (expense) income, net:
(Loss) gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets	$	(0.3	)	$	1.2	$	(1.5	)		(125.0	)%
Other (expense) income		(0.3	)		6.8		(7.1	)		(104.4	)%

Other (expense) income, net	$	(0.6	)	$	8.0	$	(8.6	)		(107.5	)%

The gain on divestitures of non-strategic assets for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2008 primarily~~2009 related to the sale of one of the buildings at the Company’s former ~~seamless steel tube manufacturing facility~~office complex located in ~~Desford, England. In February 2008,~~Torrington, Connecticut.

For the ~~Company completed~~first quarter of 2010, other (expense) income primarily consisted of $1.0 million in losses on the ~~sale~~disposal of ~~this facility, resulting in a pretax gain~~fixed assets, partially offset by $0.7 million of ~~approximately $20.4 million.~~gains from equity investments. For the first quarter of 2009, other income (expense) primarily consisted of $6.8 million of foreign currency exchange gains.

3123

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

~~For~~


Income Tax Expense:
	1Q 2010			1Q 2009			$ Change		Change

(Dollars in millions)
Income Tax Expense:	$	45.9		$	18.8		$	27.1		144.1	%
Effective tax rate		61.5	%		108.3	%		—	(4,680		) bps

The decrease in the ~~third~~effective tax rate in the first quarter of 2010, compared to the first quarter of 2009, other (expense) income, net primarily consisted of $3.1 million of losses on the disposal of fixed assets, partially offset by capital gains of $0.4 million on the Company’s available-for-sale investments and $0.4 million of royalty income. For the third quarter of 2008, other (expense) income, net primarily consisted of $2.8 million of foreign currency exchange gains, offset by $1.2 million of donations and $1.1 million of losses on the disposal of fixed assets. For the first nine months of 2009, other (expense) income, net primarily consisted of $6.1 million of foreign currency exchange gains and royalty income of $1.1 million, partially offset by $4.9 million of losses on the disposal of fixed assets and $1.7 million of losses from equity investments. For the first nine months of 2008, other (expense) income, net primarily consisted of $4.9 million of losses on the disposal of fixed assets and $3.1 million of donations, partially offset by gains on equity investments of $1.6 million and $1.2 million of foreign currency exchange gains.

~~Income Tax Expense:~~

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change

(Dollars in millions)
Income tax expense $ 7.1 $ 68.1 $ (61.0 )
Effective tax rate (60.4 )% 35.3 % —

YTD 2009 YTD 2008 $ Change

(Dollars in millions)
Income tax expense $ 2.9 $ 155.1 $ (152.2 )
Effective tax rate (5.2 )% 35.6 % —

~~The effective tax rates in the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 were unfavorable relative to the same periods in 2008,~~was primarily due to ~~increased losses at certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded.~~

~~The effective tax rates on the pretax losses for the third quarter and first nine months of 2009 were unfavorable relative to the U.S. federal statutory tax rate primarily due to~~decreased losses at certain foreign subsidiaries where no tax benefit could be recorded, ~~as well as the~~utilization of certain foreign net ~~impact of discrete tax adjustments recorded during the periods. These items were partially offset by the~~operating losses and increased earnings in certain foreign jurisdictions where the effective tax rate is less than 35%. These benefits were partially offset by a $21.6 million charge to income tax expense to record the deferred tax impact of the recently-enacted U.S. Patient Protection and ~~the net effect of~~Affordable Care Act (as amended), higher U.S. state and local taxes and reductions in other U.S. tax ~~items. Application of interim period income tax accounting rules has caused significant volatility in~~benefits, including the ~~2009 quarterly effective tax rates. For the full year of~~research and development credit which expired on December 31, 2009.


Discontinued Operations:
	1Q 2010		1Q 2009			$ Change		% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Operating results, net of tax	$	—	$	(3.6	)	$	3.6		100.0	%
Gain on disposal, net of tax		0.3		—			0.3	NM

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	$	0.3	$	(3.6	)	$	3.9		108.3	%

In December 2009, the Company ~~expects its effective tax rate to be in~~completed the ~~range of 25% to 30%.~~

~~Discontinued Operations:~~

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change % Change

(Dollars in millions)
Operating results, net of tax $ (30.8 ) $ 6.5 (37.3 ) NM

YTD 2009 YTD 2008 $ Change $ Change

(Dollars in millions)

Operating results, net of tax $ (59.9 ) $ 26.1 (86.0 ) NM

~~In July 2009, the Company announced it had signed an agreement to sell the assets~~divestiture of its NRB operations to ~~JTEKT Corporation. The transaction is expected to close by~~JTEKT. Discontinued operations for the ~~end~~first quarter of 2009 ~~subject to customer regulatory approvals and the satisfaction and waiver of other closing conditions. Discontinued operations~~ represent the operating results, ~~of this business. In the third quarter of 2009, the results of operations,~~ net of tax, ~~were a loss~~ of ~~$30.8 million, compared to income of $6.5 million for~~these operations. In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008, primarily due to a deterioration~~2010, the Company recognized an adjustment of ~~the markets served by~~$0.3 million on disposal of the NRB operations. The third quarter of 2009 also reflects a pretax impairment loss of $33.7 million and pension curtailment of $6.2 million (a total of $25.1 million after-tax) as a result of the projected proceeds from the sale of NRB operations being lower than the net book value of the net assets expected to be transferred as a result of the sale of the NRB operations to JTEKT Corporation. The third quarter of 2009 also reflects other pretax severance and related benefit costs of $8.7 million. For the first nine months of 2009, the results of discontinued operations, net of tax, were a loss of $59.9 million, compared to income of $26.1 million for the third quarter of 2009, primarily due to a deterioration of the markets served by the NRB operations and charges recorded as a result of restructuring initiatives. Including the impairment loss recorded during the third quarter of 2009, the first nine months of 2009 include pretax impairment losses of $34.5 million, pretax pension curtailments of $6.2 million and other pretax charges related to severance and related benefits of $13.1 million. Refer to Note 1814 — Divestitures in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional discussion.

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)~~


Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest:
	1Q 2010		1Q 2009			$ Change		% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest	$	0.4	$	(5.9	)	$	6.3		106.8	%

Net ~~Income (Loss) Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest:~~

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change % Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest $ 0.4 $ 1.1 (0.7 ) (63.6 )%

YTD 2009 YTD 2008 $ Change $ Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interest $ (4.9 ) $ 3.0 (7.9 ) NM

On January 1, 2009, the Company implemented new accounting rules related to noncontrolling interests. The new accounting rules establish requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company (sometimes called “minority interests”) to be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. In addition, the new accounting rules require that net income (loss) attributable to parties other than the Company be separately reported on the Consolidated Statement of Income. In the third quarter of 2009, the net income attributable to noncontrolling interest decreased $0.7 million, compared to the third quarter of 2008, as a result of lower volume for subsidiaries in which the Company holds less than 100% ownership. For the first nine months of 2009, the net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interest was ~~a loss of $4.9 million, compared to~~ income of ~~$3.0~~$0.4 million for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2008.~~2010, compared to a loss of $5.9 million for the first quarter of 2009. In the first quarter of 2009, net income (loss) ~~income~~ attributable to noncontrolling interest increased by $6.1 million due to a correction of an error related to the ~~$48.8~~$18.4 million goodwill impairment loss the Company recorded in the fourth quarter of 2008 for the Mobile Industries segment. In recording the goodwill impairment loss in the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company did not ~~fully~~ recognize that a portion of the goodwill impairment loss related to two separate subsidiaries in India and South Africa of which the Company holds less than 100% ownership. As a result, the Company’s 2008 financial statements were understated by $6.1 million and the Company’s first quarter 2009 financial statements were overstated by $6.1 million. Management concluded the effect of the first quarter adjustment was not material to the Company’s 2008 and first quarter 2009 financial statements, as well as the ~~projected~~ full-year 2009 financial statements.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Business Segments:

The primary measurement used by management to measure the financial performance of each segment is adjusted EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes, excluding the effect of amounts related to certain items that management considers not representative of ongoing operations such as impairment and restructuring, manufacturing rationalization and integration charges, one-time gains or losses on disposal of non-strategic assets ~~allocated receipts received or payments made under the U.S. Continued Dumping and Subsidy Offset Act (CDSOA)~~ and gains and losses on the dissolution of subsidiaries). Refer to Note 1110 — Segment Information in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for the reconciliation of adjusted EBIT by segment to consolidated income before income taxes.

On July 29, 2009, the Company announced it had signed an agreement to sell the assets of its NRB operations to JTEKT Corporation. The financial results for the NRB operations have been reclassified to Discontinued Operations for all periods presented. Segment results for 2009 and 2008 have been reclassified to conform to the discontinued operations presentation.

~~Mobile Industries Segment:~~

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales $ 327.6 $ 426.5 $ (98.9 ) (23.2 )%
Adjusted EBIT $ 13.7 $ 8.7 $ 5.0 57.5 %
Adjusted EBIT margin 4.2 % 2.0 % — 220 bps

YTD 2009 YTD 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales $ 920.4 $ 1,397.6 $ (477.2 ) (34.1 )%
Adjusted EBIT (loss) $ (0.6 ) $ 43.4 $ (44.0 ) (101.4 )%
Adjusted EBIT (loss) margin (0.1 )% 3.1 % — (320 ) bps

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)~~

The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales ~~of the Mobile Industries~~for each segment ~~operations~~ reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of currency exchange rates. The effects of currency exchange rates are removed to allow investors and the Company to meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to period. The presentation would also remove the effects of acquisitions and divestitures on sales, but there were none in 2010 or 2009 other than the divestiture of the NRB operations, which is already reflected as discontinued operations. The year ~~2008~~2009 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are measured; as such, currency is assumed to be zero for ~~2008.~~2009.



Mobile Industries Segment:												Mobile Industries Segment:
	3Q 2009			3Q 2008		$ Change			Change				1Q 2010			1Q 2009			$ Change		Change

(Dollars in millions)
Net sales, including intersegment sales													$	367.5		$	300.6		$	66.9		22.3	%
Adjusted EBIT													$	42.5		$	(2.3	)	$	44.8	NM
Adjusted EBIT margin														11.6	%		(0.8	)%		—	1,240		bps

Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	327.6		$	426.5	$	(98.9	)		(23.2	)%
Currency		(9.3	)		—		(9.3	)	NM

Net sales, excluding the impact of currency	$	336.9		$	426.5	$	(89.6	)		(21.0	)%

YTD 2009 YTD 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales $ 920.4 $ 1,397.6 $ (477.2 ) (34.1 )%
Currency (75.7 ) — (75.7 ) NM

Net sales, excluding the impact of currency $ 996.1 $ 1,397.6 $ (401.5 ) (28.7 )%

The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Mobile Industries segment operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of currency exchange rates.



	1Q 2010		1Q 2009		$ Change		% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	367.5	$	300.6	$	66.9		22.3	%
Currency		11.7		—		11.7	NM

Net sales, excluding the impact of currency	$	355.8	$	300.6	$	55.2		18.4	%

The Mobile Industries segment’s net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes, ~~decreased 21.0%~~increased 18.4% for the ~~third~~first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009, primarily due to higher volume of approximately $55 million. The volume increases were seen across most market sectors led by a 66% increase in heavy truck, a 37% increase in light vehicles and a 39% increase from the automotive aftermarket. Adjusted EBIT was higher in the first quarter of 2010 compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008,~~2009, primarily due to ~~lower~~higher volume ~~of approximately $110 million, partially offset by improved pricing~~ and favorable sales mix of approximately $20 million. The lower volume was seen across all market sectors, led by a 55% decline in heavy truck demand and a 53% decline in global off-highway demand. Adjusted EBIT was higher in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008, primarily due to lower selling, administrative and general expense of approximately $35 million, improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $5 million, lower material costs of approximately $20 million and lower logistics costs of approximately $10 million, partially offset by the impact of underutilization of manufacturing capacity of approximately $35 million and ~~the impact of lower demand of $30 million. The lower selling, administrative and general expenses reflect actions taken by management to align business activities with market conditions.~~

The Mobile Industries segment’s net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes, decreased 28.7% for the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to lower volumebetter manufacturing utilization of approximately $435 million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $65 million. The lower volume was seen across all market sectors, led by a 31% decline in light vehicle demand, a 57% decline in heavy truck demand and a 45% decline in off-highway demand. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to the impact of underutilization of manufacturing capacity of approximately $140 million and the impact of lower demand of $80 million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $60 million, lower selling, administrative and general expenses of $85 million and lower logistics costs of approximately $40$15 million.

The Mobile Industries segment’s sales are expected to ~~decrease~~increase approximately 10% to 20% ~~to 25%~~percent in ~~the fourth quarter of 2009,~~2010, compared to ~~the fourth quarter of 2008,~~2009 full-year results, as demand is expected to ~~be down~~increase across ~~all~~most of the Mobile Industries’ market ~~sectors. These decreases are expected~~sectors, led by increases in global light-vehicle demand of approximately 20% and global heavy truck demand of approximately 30%. The Company also expects sales to ~~be partially offset by improved pricing.~~increase approximately 20% in its automotive distribution channel during 2010, compared to the full year of 2009. In addition, adjusted EBIT for the Mobile Industries segment is expected to ~~decrease~~increase significantly during ~~the fourth quarter of 2009,~~2010, compared to ~~the same period of the prior year, as lower demand is partially offset by improved pricing and lower selling, administrative and general expenses. In reaction~~2009, primarily due to the current and anticipated lower demand, the Mobile Industries segment reduced total employment levels by approximately 2,900 positions during the first nine months of 2009. The Company expects to continue to take actions in the Mobile Industries segment to properly align its business with market demand.higher sales volume.

3425

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

~~Process Industries Segment:~~

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales $ 187.0 $ 317.9 $ (130.9 ) (41.2 )%
Adjusted EBIT $ 16.1 $ 73.3 $ (57.2 ) (78.0 )%
Adjusted EBIT margin 8.6 % 23.1 % — (1,450 ) bps



Process Industries Segment:													Process Industries Segment:
	YTD 2009			YTD 2008			$ Change			Change				1Q 2010			1Q 2009			$ Change			Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	619.1		$	897.9		$	(278.8	)		(31.1	)%		$	206.6		$	225.1		$	(18.5	)		(8.2	)%
Adjusted EBIT	$	94.6		$	180.9		$	(86.3	)		(47.7	)%		$	26.9		$	43.5		$	(16.6	)		(38.2	)%
Adjusted EBIT margin		15.3	%		20.1	%		—		(480		) bps			13.0	%		19.3	%		—		(630		) bps

The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Process Industries segment operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove the effects of currency exchange rates. The effects of currency exchange rates are removed to allow investors and the Company to meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to period. The year 2008 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are measured; as such, currency is assumed to be zero for 2008.

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales $ 187.0 $ 317.9 $ (130.9 ) (41.2 )%
Currency (4.7 ) — (4.7 ) NM

Net sales, excluding the impact of currency $ 191.7 $ 317.9 $ (126.2 ) (39.7 )%



	YTD 2009			YTD 2008		$ Change			Change			1Q 2010		1Q 2009		$ Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	619.1		$	897.9	$	(278.8	)		(31.1	)%	$	206.6	$	225.1	$	(18.5	)		(8.2	)%
Currency		(39.3	)		—		(39.3	)	NM				8.5		—		8.5		NM

Net sales, excluding the impact of currency	$	658.4		$	897.9	$	(239.5	)		(26.7	)%	$	198.1	$	225.1	$	(27.0	)		(12.0	)%

The Process Industries segment’s net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes, decreased ~~39.7%~~12.0% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009,~~2010 compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower volume of approximately ~~$140 million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $15~~$30 million. The lower volume was seen across most market sectors, led by a ~~72%~~53% decline in ~~power transmission~~cement and aggregate processing equipment demand, a 34% decline in oil and gas demand and a ~~50%~~31% decline ~~experienced by~~in gear drive demand. In addition, the Company’s industrial distribution ~~channel.~~channel experienced a 10% decline in demand. These declines were partially offset by an increase in global wind energy market demand of 25%. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009~~2010 compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008,~~2009, primarily due to the impact of lower volumes of approximately ~~$70 million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $10 million.~~

The Process Industries segment’s net sales, excluding the effects of currency-rate changes, decreased 26.7% in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower volume of approximately $310 million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $65 million. The lower volume was seen across most market sectors, led by a 60% decline in power transmission, a 44% decline in heavy industry and a 51% decline experienced by the Company’s industrial distribution channel. Adjusted EBIT was lower in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to the impact of lower volumes of approximately $155 million, partially offset by improved pricing and favorable sales mix of approximately $75$15 million. The Company expects ~~lower Process Industries segment~~ sales and adjusted EBIT for the remainder of 2009, compared to the fourth quarter of 2008, due to significantly reduced demand across most Process Industries’ market sectors. In reaction to the current and anticipated lower demand, the Process Industries segment reduced total employment levels by approximately 1,300 positions during 2009. The Process Industries segment’s sales are expected to decrease approximately 30% to 35% during the fourth quarter of 2009 as compared to fourth quarter of 2008. The Company expects to continue to take actions in the Process Industries segment to ~~properly align its business with market demand.~~

~~Management’s Discussion~~increase approximately 5% for the full year of 2010 compared to 2009, as the industrial distribution channel strengthens during the second half of 2010. However, the Process Industries segment expects 2010 adjusted EBIT to be flat compared to the full year of 2009 despite the increased sales, primarily due to higher raw material costs and ~~Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)~~higher expense related to incentive compensation plans.

~~Aerospace and Defense Segment:~~

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales $ 100.3 $ 104.7 $ (4.4 ) (4.2 )%
Adjusted EBIT $ 19.1 $ 9.8 $ 9.3 94.9 %
Adjusted EBIT margin 19.0 % 9.4 % — 960 bps



Aerospace and Defense Segment:												Aerospace and Defense Segment:
	YTD 2009			YTD 2008			$ Change		Change				1Q 2010			1Q 2009			$ Change			Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	318.8		$	302.2		$	16.6		5.5	%		$	92.1		$	109.3		$	(17.2	)		(15.7	)%
Adjusted EBIT	$	56.0		$	24.0		$	32.0		133.3	%		$	12.8		$	18.1		$	(5.3	)		(29.3	)%
Adjusted EBIT margin		17.6	%		7.9	%		—	970		bps			13.9	%		16.6	%		—		(270		) bps

The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Aerospace and Defense segment operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove ~~the effects of acquisitions made in 2008 and~~ currency exchange rates. The effects of acquisitions and currency exchange rates are removed to allow investors and the Company to meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to period. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of EXTEX. Acquisitions in the current year represent the increase in sales, year over year, for this recent acquisition. The year 2008 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are measured; as such, currency is assumed to be zero for 2008.

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales $ 100.3 $ 104.7 $ (4.4 ) (4.2 )%
Acquisitions 3.4 — 3.4 NM
Currency (0.6 ) — (0.6 ) NM

Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency $ 97.5 $ 104.7 $ (7.2 ) (6.9 )%



	YTD 2009			YTD 2008		$ Change			Change			1Q 2010		1Q 2009		$ Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	318.8		$	302.2	$	16.6			5.5	%	$	92.1	$	109.3	$	(17.2	)		(15.7	)%
Acquisitions		9.2			—		9.2		NM
Currency		(4.0	)		—		(4.0	)	NM				0.7		—		0.7		NM

Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency	$	313.6		$	302.2	$	11.4			3.8	%
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency												$	91.4	$	109.3	$	(17.9	)		(16.4	)%

The Aerospace and Defense segment’s net sales, excluding the impact of ~~acquisitions and~~ currency-rate changes, decreased 6.9% in the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, as a result of reduced demand across commercial and civil aircraft markets, partially offset by continued strength of defense markets. Profitability for the third quarter of 2009, compared to the third quarter of 2008, improved approximately $9 million primarily due to structural profitability improvements and improved pricing.

~~The Aerospace and Defense segment’s net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency-rate changes, increased 3.8%~~16.4% in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009,~~2010, compared to the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2008, as~~2009, primarily due to a ~~result of improved pricing and favorable sales mix~~decrease in volume of approximately ~~$10~~$20 million. ~~Adjusted EBIT~~Volume was down across most key market sectors as the Aerospace and Defense segment continues to experience softening that began in the middle of the prior year. Profitability for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009,~~2010 compared to the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2008, improved~~2009 declined primarily due to ~~leveraging these increases in sales with improved manufacturing performance.~~lower volume. The Company expects the Aerospace and Defense segment to see a modest ~~increase~~declines in sales ~~for the full year of 2009,~~and adjusted EBIT in 2010, compared to 2008, as a result of the continued integration of the acquisition of The Purdy Corporation, acquired in October 2007, which has a strong defense-oriented profile, and the benefits from the inclusion of a full year of sales from the EXTEX acquisition. The Aerospace and Defense segment’s adjusted EBIT is expected to improve in 2009 from 2008, leveraging improved manufacturing performance and the integration of acquisitions. The Aerospace and Defense segment has reduced employment by approximately 400 associates during 2009, as a result of ~~profitability improvement initiatives.~~softer commercial and general aviation market sectors and flat defense market sectors.

3626

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Steel Segment:
3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales $ 157.9 $ 536.5 $ (378.6 ) (70.6 )%
Adjusted EBIT (loss) $ (20.3 ) $ 133.8 $ (154.1 ) (115.2 )%
Adjusted EBIT (loss) margin (12.9 )% 24.9 % — (3,780 ) bps



Steel Segment:													Steel Segment:
	YTD 2009			YTD 2008			$ Change			Change				1Q 2010			1Q 2009			$ Change		Change

(Dollars in millions)
Net sales, including intersegment sales														$	270.3		$	248.6		$	21.7		8.7	%
Adjusted EBIT														$	19.9		$	(7.3	)	$	27.2	NM
Adjusted EBIT margin															7.4	%		(2.9	)%		—	1,030		bps

Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	541.4		$	1,480.5		$	(939.1	)		(63.4	)%
Adjusted EBIT (loss)	$	(60.4	)	$	267.5		$	(327.9	)		(122.6	)%
Adjusted EBIT (loss) margin		(11.2	)%		18.1	%		—		(2,930		) bps

The presentation below reconciles the changes in net sales of the Steel segment operations reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP to net sales adjusted to remove ~~the effects of acquisitions made in 2008 and~~ currency exchange rates. The effects of acquisitions and currency exchange rates are removed to allow investors and the Company to meaningfully evaluate the percentage change in net sales on a comparable basis from period to period. During the first quarter of 2008, the Company completed the acquisition of the assets of BSI. Acquisitions in the current year represent the increase in sales, year over year, for only the first quarter period for this acquisition. The year 2008 represents the base year for which the effects of currency are measured; as such, currency is assumed to be zero for 2008.

3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales $ 157.9 $ 536.5 $ (378.6 ) (70.6 )%
Acquisitions — — — NM
Currency (1.6 ) — (1.6 ) NM

Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency $ 159.5 $ 536.5 $ (377.0 ) (70.3 )%



	YTD 2009			YTD 2008		$ Change			Change			1Q 2010		1Q 2009		$ Change		% Change

(Dollars in millions)

Net sales, including intersegment sales	$	541.4		$	1,480.5	$	(939.1	)		(63.4	)%	$	270.3	$	248.6	$	21.7		8.7	%
Acquisitions		7.5			—		7.5		NM
Currency		(5.2	)		—		(5.2	)	NM				0.4		—		0.4	NM

Net sales, excluding the impact of acquisitions and currency	$	539.1		$	1,480.5	$	(941.4	)		(63.6	)%
Net sales, excluding the impact of currency												$	269.9	$	248.6	$	21.3		8.6	%

The Steel segment’s net sales for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009,~~2010, excluding the effect of ~~acquisitions and~~ currency-rate changes, ~~decreased 70.3%~~increased 8.6% compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008~~2009 primarily due to ~~lower~~higher volume of approximately ~~$165~~$20 million, ~~across all~~primarily driven by the automotive market ~~sectors~~sector, and ~~lower~~higher surcharges in the ~~third~~first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009, ~~compared~~partially offset by unfavorable sales mix of approximately $20 million. Surcharges increased to ~~the third quarter of 2008. Surcharges decreased to $21.0~~$59.5 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009~~2010 from ~~$234.4~~$37.1 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008.~~2009. Surcharges are a pricing mechanism that the Company uses to recover scrap steel, energy and certain alloy costs, which are derived from published monthly indices. The average scrap index for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009~~2010 was ~~$311~~$416 per ton compared to ~~$759~~$219 per ton for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008.~~2009. Steel shipments for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009~~2010 were ~~132,306~~221,187 tons compared to ~~281,341~~202,309 tons for the ~~third~~first quarter 2009, an increase of ~~2008, a decrease of 53.0%~~9.3%. The Steel segment’s average selling price, including surcharges, was ~~$1,194~~$1,222 per ton for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009,~~2010 compared to an average selling price of ~~$1,907~~$1,229 per ton ~~for~~in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008.~~2009. The decrease in the average selling prices was primarily the result of ~~lower~~unfavorable sales mix, partially offset by higher surcharges. The ~~lower~~higher surcharges were the result of ~~lower~~higher market prices for certain input raw materials, especially scrap steel, ~~natural gas~~nickel and molybdenum.

The Steel segment’s adjusted EBIT ~~decreased $154.1~~increased $27.2 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of 2010 compared to the first quarter of 2009 ~~compared to the third quarter of 2008,~~ primarily due to ~~lower~~the timing of surcharges of ~~$213~~$22 million, ~~the impact of~~ lower ~~sales volume~~manufacturing costs of approximately ~~$85~~$20 million and the impact of higher sales volume of approximately $10 million, partially offset by the ~~underutilization~~impact of ~~capacity~~unfavorable sales mix of approximately $15 million ~~partially offset by lower raw material costs of approximately $165 million~~ and ~~lower~~higher LIFO ~~charges of $14 million.~~expense. In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009,~~2010, the Steel segment recognized LIFO ~~income~~expense of $4$0.3 million compared to LIFO income of ~~$18~~$12.4 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2008.~~2009. Raw material costs consumed in the manufacturing process, including scrap steel, alloys and energy, ~~decreased 77%~~increased 24% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009 compared to~~2010 over the ~~same~~comparable period in the prior year to an average cost of ~~$150 per ton.~~

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)~~

The Steel segment’s net sales for the first nine months of 2009, excluding the effects of acquisitions and currency-rate changes, decreased 63.6% compared to the first nine months of 2008 primarily due to lower volume of approximately $480 million across all market sectors and lower surcharges in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008. Surcharges decreased to $69.3 million in the first nine months of 2009 from $543.7 million in the first nine months of 2008. The average scrap index for the first nine months of 2009 was $243 per ton compared to $615 per ton for the first nine months of 2008. Steel shipments for the first nine months of 2009 were 444,411 tons, compared to 919,582 tons for the first nine months of 2008, a decrease of 52%. The Steel segment’s average selling price, including surcharges, was $1,218 per ton for the first nine months of 2009, compared to an average selling price of $1,610 per ton for the first nine months of 2008. The decrease in the average selling prices was primarily the result of lower surcharges. The lower surcharges were the result of lower prices for certain input raw materials, especially scrap steel, molybdenum, natural gas and nickel.

The Steel segment’s adjusted EBIT decreased $327.9 million in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008, primarily due to lower surcharges of $475 million, the impact of lower sales volume of approximately $225 million and the impact of the underutilization of capacity of approximately $90 million, partially offset by lower raw material costs of approximately $365 million and lower LIFO charges of $48 million. In the first nine months of 2009, the Steel segment recognized LIFO income of $20.3 million, compared to LIFO expense of $27.3 million in the first nine months of 2008. Raw material costs consumed in the manufacturing process, including scrap steel, alloys and energy, decreased 57% in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months in the prior year to an average cost of $247$388 per ton.

The Company expects the Steel segment to see a ~~50%~~60% to ~~60% decrease~~70% increase in sales for the remainder of ~~2009, compared to the fourth quarter of 2008,~~2010 due to ~~lower~~higher volume and ~~lower average selling prices. The lower average selling prices are driven by lower~~higher surcharges, as scrap steel and alloy prices have ~~fallen~~risen substantially from ~~historically high~~the low levels experienced in ~~2008.~~2009. The Company also expects ~~lower~~higher demand across most ~~market sectors,~~markets, primarily driven by ~~a 57% decline~~an 80% increase in ~~energy markets~~industrial market sectors and a ~~55% decline~~50% increase in ~~industrial markets.~~automotive market sectors. The Company expects the Steel segment’s adjusted EBIT to be significantly ~~lower~~higher in 2010, compared to a loss in 2009, primarily due to the ~~lower demand~~higher sales volume and ~~average selling prices, partially offset by lower raw material costs and related LIFO income.~~surcharges. Scrap ~~alloy and energy~~ costs are expected to increase in the ~~near term~~short-term from current levels ~~as global industrial production improves~~ and then level ~~off. As a result of lower projected year-end 2009 scrap costs~~off, as are alloy and other raw material costs, compared to year-end 2008, as well as lower quantities, the Steel segment expects to recognize approximately $25 million to $30 million in LIFO income for 2009. In light of the current market demands, the Steel segment reduced total employment levels by approximately 670 positions during the first nine months of 2009. The Company will continue to take actions in the Steel segment to properly align its business with market demand.energy costs.

Corporate Expense:
3Q 2009 3Q 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)

Corporate Expense $ 10.3 $ 19.0 $ (8.7 ) (45.8 )%
Corporate expense % to net sales 1.4 % 1.4 % — 0 bps

YTD 2009 YTD 2008 $ Change Change

(Dollars in millions)

Corporate Expense $ 35.8 $ 54.7 $ (18.9 ) (34.6 )%
Corporate expense % to net sales 1.5 % 1.4 % — 10 bps


Corporate:
	1Q 2010			1Q 2009			$ Change		Change

(Dollars in millions)
Corporate expenses	$	13.8		$	12.3		$	1.5		12.2	%
Corporate expenses % to net sales		1.5	%		1.4	%		—	10		bps

Corporate expenses ~~decreased~~increased for the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2009,~~2010 compared to the ~~third quarter and first nine months of 2008,~~same period in 2009 as a result of ~~lower performance-based~~higher expense related to incentive compensation ~~and~~plans, partially offset by the impact of restructuring initiatives.

3827

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

The Balance Sheet

Total assets as shown on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 decreased by ~~$78.3~~$18.8 million ~~from~~compared to December 31, ~~2008.~~2009. This decrease in 2010 was primarily due to lower cash and cash equivalents and lower plant, property ~~plant~~ and equipment, ~~and lower~~partially offset by higher working capital as a result of ~~lower volumes and capital expenditures in 2009, partially offset by cash proceeds from the issuance of new fixed-rate unsecured Senior Notes.~~higher volumes.


Current Assets:	Current Assets:											Current Assets:
		Sept. 30,		Dec. 31,									March 31,		Dec. 31
		2009		2008		$ Change			% Change				2010		2009		$ Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)

Cash and cash equivalents		$	382.9	$	133.4	$	249.5			187.0	%		$	709.3	$	755.5	$	(46.2	)		(6.1	)%
Restricted cash			248.2		—		248.2		NM
Accounts receivable, net			458.4		575.9		(117.5	)		(20.4	)%			489.1		411.2		77.9			18.9	%
Inventories, net			716.9		1,000.5		(283.6	)		(28.3	)%			689.4		671.2		18.2			2.7	%
Deferred income taxes			69.6		83.4		(13.8	)		(16.5	)%			60.9		61.5		(0.6	)		(1.0	)%
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses			17.5		9.7		7.8			80.4	%			11.6		11.8		(0.2	)		(1.7	)%
Current assets of discontinued operations			364.5		182.9		181.6			99.3	%
Other current assets			58.7		47.7		11.0			23.1	%			98.7		111.3		(12.6	)		(11.3	)%

Total current assets		$	2,316.7	$	2,033.5	$	283.2			13.9	%		$	2,059.0	$	2,022.5	$	36.5			1.8	%

Refer to the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for a discussion of the ~~increase~~decrease in cash and cash equivalents. Restricted cash represents the net proceeds received from the issuance of $250 million of fixed-rate 6.0% unsecured Senior Notes in September 2009, which will be used to redeem $250 million of fixed-rate 5.75% unsecured Senior Notes maturing in February 2010. Accounts receivable, net ~~decreased~~increased as a result of the ~~lower~~higher sales in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2009, as~~2010 compared to the fourth quarter of 2008. The decrease in inventories was primarily due to lower volume and the Company’s concerted effort to decrease inventory levels, as well as lower raw material costs, partially offset by the impact of foreign currency translation. Other current assets2009. Inventories increased primarily due to higher volume. The decrease in other current ~~year~~assets is primarily due to a decrease in net income taxes receivable ~~partially offset by the reduction of assets held for sale~~ as a result of the ~~sale of portions~~current-year provision for income taxes. This decrease was partially offset by a $6.5 million reclassification of the ~~Torrington campus. Current assets of discontinued operations increased due to the reclassification of~~Company’s investment in two joint ventures, Internacional Component Supply LTDA and Endorsia.com, from other non-current assets ~~related to NRB operations to current assets~~ as ~~a result of qualifying as~~these investments are considered assets held for ~~sale.~~sale at March 31, 2010.


Property, Plant and Equipment — Net:
Property, Plant and Equipment – Net:													Property, Plant and Equipment – Net:
	Sept. 30,			Dec. 31,										March 31,			Dec. 31,
	2009			2008			$ Change			% Change				2010			2009			$ Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)

Property, plant and equipment	$	3,655.0		$	3,592.1		$	62.9			1.8	%		$	3,420.2		$	3,398.1		$	22.1			0.7	%
Less: allowances for depreciation		(2,229.0	)		(2,075.1	)		(153.9	)		(7.4	)%			(2,117.7	)		(2,062.9	)		(54.8	)		(2.7	)%

Property, plant and equipment — net	$	1,426.0		$	1,517.0		$	(91.0	)		(6.0	)%		$	1,302.5		$	1,335.2		$	(32.7	)		(2.4	)%

The decrease in property, plant and equipment — net in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009~~2010 was primarily due to current-year depreciation expense exceeding capital ~~expenditures. In addition,~~expenditures and the impact of ~~asset impairments also reduced property, plant and equipment — net in the first nine months of 2009.~~foreign currency translation.

Other Assets:
Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
2009 2008 $ Change % Change

(Dollars in millions)

Goodwill $ 222.2 $ 221.4 $ 0.8 0.4 %
Other intangible assets 134.4 140.9 (6.5 ) (4.6 )%
Deferred income taxes 310.9 315.0 (4.1 ) (1.3 )%
Non-current assets of discontinued operations — 269.6 (269.6 ) (100.0 )%
Other non-current assets 47.8 38.7 9.1 23.5 %

Total other assets $ 715.3 $ 985.6 $ (270.3 ) (27.4 )%

The decrease in other intangible assets was primarily due to amortization expense recognized during the first nine months of 2009. The decrease in non-current assets is due to the reclassification of non-current assets related to the NRB operations to current assets, as well as the asset impairment loss recognized during the third quarter of 2009.


Other Assets:
	March 31,		Dec. 31,
	2010		2009		$ Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Goodwill	$	221.0	$	221.7	$	(0.7	)		(0.3	)%
Other intangible assets		129.8		132.1		(2.3	)		(1.7	)%
Deferred income taxes		236.2		248.6		(12.4	)		(5.0	)%
Other non-current assets		39.6		46.8		(7.2	)		(15.4	)%

Total other assets	$	626.6	$	649.2	$	(22.6	)		(3.5	)%

3928

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Current Liabilities:
Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
2009 2008 $ Change % Change

(Dollars in millions)
Short-term debt $ 63.3 $ 91.5 $ (28.2 ) (30.8 )%
Accounts payable and other liabilities 352.6 423.5 (70.9 ) (16.7 )%
Salaries, wages and benefits 147.8 217.1 (69.3 ) (31.9 )%
Income taxes payable — 22.5 (22.5 ) (100.0 )%
Deferred income taxes 5.0 5.1 (0.1 ) (2.0 )%
Current liabilities of discontinued operations 44.2 21.5 22.7 105.6 %
Current portion of long-term debt 268.6 17.1 251.5 NM

Total current liabilities $ 881.5 $ 798.3 $ 83.2 10.4 %

The decrease in other intangible assets was primarily due to current-year amortization. The decrease in deferred income taxes is primarily due to a reduction in deferred tax assets caused by the enactment of the U.S. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (as amended). Other non-current assets decreased as a result of the reclassification of the Company’s investment in two joint ventures, Internacional Component Supply LTDA and Endorsia.com, to other current assets as mentioned on the previous page.


Current Liabilities:
	March 31,		Dec. 31,
	2010		2009		$ Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Short-term debt	$	30.0	$	26.3	$	3.7			14.1	%
Accounts payable		221.9		156.0		65.9			42.2	%
Salaries, wages and benefits		161.5		142.5		19.0			13.3	%
Deferred income taxes		9.2		9.2		—			0.0	%
Other current liabilities		163.7		189.3		(25.6	)		(13.5	)%
Current portion of long-term debt		14.7		17.1		(2.4	)		(14.0	)%

Total current liabilities	$	601.0	$	540.4	$	60.6			11.2	%

The ~~decrease~~increase in short-term debt was primarily due to ~~lower~~increased net borrowings by the Company’s foreign subsidiaries under lines of credit due to ~~lower~~higher seasonal working capital requirements. The ~~decrease~~increase in accounts payable ~~and other liabilities~~ was primarily due to ~~lower~~higher volumes. The ~~decrease~~increase in accrued salaries, wages and benefits was the result of ~~the payout of 2008 performance-based compensation~~accruals for current-year incentive plans in the first quarter of ~~2009 and no accrued performance-based compensation for 2009.~~2010. The decrease in ~~income taxes payable was primarily due to income tax payments during the first nine months of 2009 and benefits recognized on the~~other current ~~consolidated pretax loss. The resulting receivable balance in income taxes payable was reclassified to Other current assets as of September 30, 2009. Current~~ liabilities of discontinued operations increased due to the reclassification of non-current liabilities related to NRB operations to current liabilities as a result of qualifying as assets held for sale. The increase in the current portion of long-term debt was due to the reclassification of the Company’s $250 million 5.75% fixed-rate unsecured Senior Notes, which mature in February 2010, from non-current liabilities to current liabilities.

Non-Current Liabilities:
Sept. 30, Dec. 31,
2009 2008 $ Change % Change

(Dollars in millions)
Long-term debt $ 469.1 $ 515.3 $ (46.2 ) (9.0 )%
Accrued pension cost 786.6 830.0 (43.4 ) (5.2 )%
Accrued postretirement benefits cost 611.7 613.0 (1.3 ) (0.2 )%
Deferred income taxes 8.5 8.5 — 0.0 %
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations — 23.9 (23.9 ) (100.0 )%
Other non-current liabilities 109.6 84.0 25.6 30.5 %

Total non-current liabilities $ 1,985.5 $ 2,074.7 $ (89.2 ) (4.3 )%

~~The decrease in long-term debt~~ was primarily due to the ~~payment~~payout of severance payments related to 2009 restructuring activities.


Non-Current Liabilities:
	March 31,		Dec. 31,
	2010		2009		$ Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Long-term debt	$	471.2	$	469.3	$	1.9			0.4	%
Accrued pension cost		579.4		690.9		(111.5	)		(16.1	)%
Accrued postretirement benefits cost		601.4		604.2		(2.8	)		(0.5	)%
Deferred income taxes		6.6		6.1		0.5			8.2	%
Other non-current liabilities		99.0		100.4		(1.4	)		(1.4	)%

Total non-current liabilities	$	1,757.6	$	1,870.9	$	(113.3	)		(6.1	)%

The decrease in accrued pension cost was primarily due to the Company’s ~~variable-rate unsecured Canadian note~~contribution of approximately $106 million of contributions to its defined benefit plans during the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2009. In addition, the Company issued $250 million of fixed-rated unsecured Senior Notes that will mature in September 2014. This issuance was offset in long-term debt by the reclassification of the Company’s $250 million fixed-rate unsecured Senior Notes, which mature in February 2010, to current liabilities. Accrued pension cost decreased primarily due to pension contributions to the Company’s defined benefit pension plans, partially offset by pension expense. The decrease in non-current liabilities is due to the reclassification of non-current liabilities related to the NRB operations to current liabilities. Other non-current liabilities increased due in part to an increase in the Company’s accruals for uncertain tax positions.2010.


Equity:
Shareholders’ Equity:													Shareholders’ Equity:
	Sept. 30,			Dec. 31,										March 31,			Dec. 31,
	2009			2008			$ Change			% Change				2010			2009			$ Change			% Change

(Dollars in millions)
Common stock	$	892.8		$	891.4		$	1.4			0.2	%		$	911.1		$	896.5		$	14.6			1.6	%
Earnings invested in the business		1,431.7			1,580.1			(148.4	)		(9.4	)%			1,422.8			1,402.9			19.9			1.4	%
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(747.1	)		(819.6	)		72.5			(8.8	)%			(699.3	)		(717.1	)		17.8			2.5	%
Treasury shares		(4.5	)		(11.6	)		7.1			(61.2	)%			(23.5	)		(4.7	)		(18.8	)	NM
Noncontrolling interest		18.1			22.8			(4.7	)		20.6	%			18.4			18.0			0.4			2.2	%

Total equity	$	1,591.0		$	1,663.1		$	(72.1	)		(4.3	)%
Total shareholders’ equity														$	1,629.5		$	1,595.6		$	33.9			2.1	%

4029

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Earnings invested in the business ~~decreased~~increased in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009~~2010 by a net ~~loss~~income of ~~$113.8~~$28.6 million, ~~and~~partially offset by dividends declared of ~~$34.6~~$8.7 million. The decrease in accumulated other comprehensive loss was primarily due to ~~the positive impact of foreign currency translation, partially offset by~~ the recognition of prior-year service costs and actuarial losses for defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit ~~plans. The increase~~plans and a $14.0 million prior period adjustment related to deferred taxes on post-retirement prescription drug benefits, specifically the employer subsidy provided by the U.S. government under Medicare Part D. Refer to Note 13 – Income taxes in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on the prior period adjustment. These decreases are partially offset by the foreign currency translation adjustment of ~~$54.3~~$13.2 million ~~was~~ due to the ~~weakening~~strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies, such as the ~~Brazilian real,~~Euro, the Romanian lei and the British ~~pound, the South African rand, the Czech Republic koruna and the Euro.~~pound. See “Foreign Currency” for further discussion regarding the impact of foreign currency translation. Treasury shares ~~decreased~~increased in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009~~2010 as a result of ~~utilizing these shares for the Company’s~~Company repurchasing stock ~~compensation plans. Noncontrolling interest decreased~~under its 2006 common stock purchase plan.


Cash Flows:
	March 31,			March 31,
	2010			2009			$ Change

(Dollars in millions)
Net cash (used) provided by operating activities	$	(13.8	)	$	33.1		$	(46.9	)
Net cash used by investing activities		(15.1	)		(29.6	)		14.5
Net cash used by financing activities		(10.7	)		(9.7	)		(1.0	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(6.6	)		(3.1	)		(3.5	)

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(46.2	)	$	(9.3	)	$	(36.9	)

Net cash from operating activities used cash of $13.8 million in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009~~2010 after providing cash of $33.1 million in the first quarter of 2009. The change in cash from operating activities was primarily due to ~~net losses attributable to noncontrolling interest.~~

Cash Flows:
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2009 2008 $ Change

(Dollars in millions)
Net cash provided by operating activities $ 424.3 $ 308.8 $ 115.5
Net cash used by investing activities (75.6 ) (209.4 ) 133.8
Net cash used by financing activities (118.5 ) (12.7 ) (105.8 )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 19.3 (14.5 ) 33.8

Increase in cash and cash equivalents $ 249.5 $ 72.2 $ 177.3

~~Net cash provided by operating activities increased from $308.8 million for the first nine months of 2008 to $424.3 million for the first nine months of 2009~~higher pension contributions and other postretirement benefit payments as ~~the result of higher~~well as lower cash provided by working capital items, particularly inventories and accounts receivable, partially offset by ~~lower~~higher net ~~income adjusted for impairment charges, higher defined benefit pension plan~~income. Pension contributions and ~~lower cash provided from discontinued operations. Inventories provided~~other postretirement benefit payments were $118.7 million for the first quarter of 2010, compared to $14.7 million for the first quarter of 2009. Accounts receivable used cash of ~~$311.5~~$82.1 million in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009~~2010 after ~~using~~providing cash of ~~$213.4~~$55.4 million in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2008. Accounts receivable provided~~2009. Inventories used cash of ~~$128.4~~$22.5 million in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009~~2010 after ~~using~~providing cash of ~~$81.2~~$59.9 million in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2008. Inventories~~2009. Accounts receivable and ~~accounts receivable provided cash~~inventories increased in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009~~2010 primarily due to ~~lower~~higher volumes ~~and~~compared to the ~~Company’s concerted effort~~first quarter of 2009. In addition, the increase in accounts receivable was partially offset by the collection of retained receivables from the sale of the NRB operations of approximately $30 million to ~~improve working capital.~~$35 million. Accounts payable and accrued expenses ~~including income taxes, were a net use of~~provided cash of ~~$169.4~~$60.4 million in the first quarter of 2010 after using cash of $133.9 million for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009 after providing cash of $97.1 million for the first nine months of 2008.~~2009. Net income ~~(including discontinued operations), adjusted for impairment charges, decreased $303.3~~increased $27.7 million in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009,~~2010 compared to the first nine months of 2008. Contributions to the Company’s defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit payments increased from $55.8 million for the first nine months of 2008 to $89.2 million for the first nine months of 2009. Cash flow from discontinued operations decreased from $60.7 million in the first nine months of 2008 to $33.3 million in the first nine monthsquarter of 2009.

The net cash used by investing activities of ~~$75.6~~$15.1 million for the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2009~~2010 decreased from the same period in ~~2008~~2009 primarily due to ~~lower~~an $18.2 million decrease in capital expenditures in the current year and lower acquisition activity, partially offset by lower proceeds from disposals of property, plant and equipment. Capital expenditures decreased $95.3 million in the first nine months of 2009, compared to the first nine months of 2008.year. The Company expects to ~~reduce~~increase capital expenditures by approximately ~~50%~~20% in ~~2009, compared to 2008 levels, in response to the current economic downturn. Cash used for acquisitions decreased $56.8 million in 2009,~~2010 compared to the same period in 2008, primarily due to the acquisition of the assets of BSI in 2008. Proceeds from the disposal of property, plant and equipment decreased $27.2 million primarily due to the sale of the Company’s former seamless steel tube manufacturing facility located in Desford, England for approximately $28.0 million during the first quarter of 2008.2009 level.

The net cash flows from financing activities used cash of ~~$118.5~~$10.7 million ~~during~~in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009~~2010 after using cash of ~~$12.7~~$9.7 million ~~during~~in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2008. The increased use of cash was primarily due to repayments of debt. The Company reduced its net borrowings, net of restricted cash, by $84.5 million during the first nine months of~~ 2009, in light of cash provided from operations and lower acquisition activity, as well as lower capital expenditures. In September 2009, the Company issued $250 million of fixed-rate unsecured Senior Notes. The net proceeds of $248.2 million was reclassified to restricted cash and will be used to redeem fixed-rate unsecured Senior Notes that mature in February 2010. In addition, net proceeds from common share activity decreased $16.2 million for the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008 as a result of ~~fewer exercises of~~ the Company’s ~~outstanding~~repurchase of $14.0 million of Company stock ~~options,~~during the first quarter of 2010. This use of cash was partially offset by lower cash dividends paid to shareholders ~~of $15.5 million in~~and higher net proceeds from stock option exercises during the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009,~~2010, compared to the first ~~nine months of 2008, as a result of the Company cutting its quarterly dividend beginning in the second~~ quarter of 2009.

4130

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~Total~~At March 31, 2010, cash and cash equivalents of $709.3 million exceeded total debt ~~was $801.0 million at September 30, 2009, compared to $623.9 million at~~of $515.9 million. At December 31, ~~2008. Net~~2009, cash and cash equivalents of $755.5 million exceeded total debt ~~was $169.9 million at September 30, 2009, compared to $490.5 million at December 31, 2008.~~of $512.7 million. The net debt to capital ratio was ~~9.6%~~a negative 13.5% and 17.9%, respectively, at ~~September 30, 2009, compared to 22.8% at~~March 31, 2010 and December 31, ~~2008.~~2009.

Reconciliation of total debt to net debt and the ratio of net debt to capital:


Net Debt:	Net Debt:							Net Debt:
		Sept. 30,			Dec. 31,				March 31,			Dec. 31,
		2009			2008				2010			2009

(Dollars in millions)
Short-term debt		$	63.3		$	91.5			$	30.0		$	26.3
Current portion of long-term debt			268.6			17.1				14.7			17.1
Long-term debt			469.1			515.3				471.2			469.3

Total debt			801.0			623.9				515.9			512.7
Less: cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash			(631.1	)		(133.4	)
Less: cash and cash equivalents										(709.3	)		(755.5	)

Net debt		$	169.9		$	490.5
Net (cash) debt									$	(193.4	)	$	(242.8	)


Ratio of Net Debt to Capital:	Ratio of Net Debt to Capital:							Ratio of Net Debt to Capital:
		Sept. 30,			Dec. 31,				March 31,			Dec. 31,
		2009			2008				2010			2009

(Dollars in millions)
Net debt		$	169.9		$	490.5
Net (cash) debt									$	(193.4	)	$	(242.8	)
Shareholders’ equity			1,591.0			1,663.1				1,629.5			1,595.6

Net debt + shareholders’ equity (capital)		$	1,760.9		$	2,153.6
Net (cash) debt + shareholders’ equity (capital)									$	1,436.1		$	1,352.8

Ratio of net debt to capital			9.6	%		22.8	%
Ratio of net (cash) debt to capital										(13.5	)%		(17.9	)%

The Company presents net (cash) debt because it believes net (cash) debt is more representative of the Company’s financial position.

At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its 364-day Asset Securitization Agreement (Asset Securitization), which provides for borrowings up to ~~$175~~$100 million, subject to certain borrowing base limitations, and is secured by certain domestic trade receivables of the Company. ~~As of September 30, 2009, although~~Although the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the Asset Securitization, as of March 31, 2010, certain borrowing base limitations reduced the availability under the Asset Securitization to ~~$75.6~~$97.1 million.

On July 10, 2009, the Company entered into a new $500 million Amended and Restated Credit Agreement. This new Senior Credit Facility replaces the former Senior Credit Facility, which was due to expire on June 30, 2010. The new Senior Credit Facility matures on July 10, 2012. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its ~~new~~$500 million Senior Credit Facility, but had letters of credit outstanding totaling ~~$35.5~~$32.2 million, which reduced the availability under the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility to ~~$464.5~~$467.8 million. The Senior Credit Facility matures on July 10, 2012. Under the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility, the Company has three financial covenants: a consolidated leverage ratio, a consolidated interest coverage ratio and a consolidated minimum tangible net worth test. At March 31, 2010, the Company was in full compliance with the covenants under the Senior Credit Facility and its other debt agreements. The maximum consolidated leverage ratio permitted under the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility ~~was 3.5~~is 3.75 to 1.0. As of ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio was ~~1.94~~1.32 to 1.0. The minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio permitted under the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility ~~was~~is 4.0 to 1.0. As of ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company’s consolidated interest coverage ratio was ~~7.56~~10.24 to 1.0. As of ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company’s consolidated tangible net worth exceeded the minimum required amount by a significant margin. Refer to Note ~~7 —~~6 – Financing Arrangements in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.

The interest rate under the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility is based on the Company’s consolidated leverage ratio. In addition, the Company ~~will pay~~pays a facility fee based on the consolidated leverage ratio multiplied by the aggregate commitments of all of the lenders under this agreement. Financing costs on the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility ~~will be~~are being amortized over the life of the new agreement and are expected to result in approximately $2.9 million in annual interest expense.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Other sources of liquidity include lines of credit for certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries, which provide for borrowings up to ~~$383.3~~$303.9 million. The majority of these lines are uncommitted. At ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company had borrowings outstanding of ~~$63.3~~$30.0 million, ~~against these lines,~~ which reduced the availability under these facilities to ~~$320~~$273.9 million.

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)~~

The Company expects that any cash requirements in excess of cash on hand and cash generated from operating activities will be met by the committed funds available under its Asset Securitization and the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility. The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations through at least the term of the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility.

The Company expects to remain in compliance with its debt covenants. However, the Company may need to limit its borrowings under the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility or other facilities in order to remain in compliance. As of ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company could have borrowed ~~up to an additional $432 million~~the full amounts available under the ~~new~~ Senior Credit Facility ~~or other facilities without violating~~and Asset Securitization Agreement, and would have still been in compliance with its debt covenants.

In September 2009, the Company issued $250 million of fixed-rated unsecured Senior Notes. These ~~new~~ Senior Notes, which mature in September 2014, bear interest at 6.0% per annum. The net proceeds from the sale of the ~~new~~ Senior Notes ~~will be~~were used in December 2009 to redeem fixed-rate unsecured Senior Notes maturing in February 2010. ~~The net proceeds from the sale of the new Senior Notes are classified as restricted cash on the balance sheet as of September 30, 2009.~~

The Company’s debt, including the new Senior Notes, is rated “Baa3,” by Moody’s Investor Services and “BBB-”“ by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services, both of which are considered ~~investment grade~~investment-grade credit ratings.

~~For the full year of 2009, the~~The Company expects to continue to generate cash from operations ~~due to lower working capital levels,~~ as ~~well as lower income taxes and reduced selling, administrative and general expenses.~~the Company experiences improved margins in 2010. In addition, the Company expects to ~~decrease~~increase capital expenditures by ~~50%~~approximately 20% in ~~2009,~~2010, compared to ~~2008.~~2009. The Company also expects to make approximately ~~$65~~$135 million in pension contributions in ~~2009,~~2010, compared to ~~$22.1~~$65 million in ~~2008.~~

~~The Company may take further actions~~2009, of which $106 million has been contributed to reduce expenses and preserve liquidity beyond the actions announced to-date as it reacts to economic and financial conditions. In addition, further actions may be taken to reduce expenses in order to optimize the size of the Company as a result of current and anticipated market demand. However, at this time these actions are not expected to have a material impact on the liquidity of the Company.

In addition, the Company expects to receive approximately $330 million in cash proceeds from the sale of the NRB operations (including certain receivables to be retained by the Company), subject to working capital adjustments. The sale of the NRB operations is expected to close by the end of 2009.date.

Financing Obligations and Other Commitments

The Company currently expects to make cash contributions of approximately $135 million, over $100 million of which is discretionary, to its global defined benefit pension plans ~~of approximately $65 million~~ in ~~2009.~~2010. During the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2009,~~2010, the Company has made ~~cash~~ contributions of approximately ~~$55~~$106 million to its defined ~~benefit~~ pension plans. Returns for the Company’s global defined benefit pension plan assets in ~~2008~~2009 were significantly ~~below~~above the expected rate of return assumption of 8.75 percent due to broad ~~declines~~increases in global equity markets. These ~~unfavorable~~favorable returns ~~negatively~~positively impacted the funded status of the plans at the end of ~~2008~~2009 and are expected to result in ~~significant~~lower pension expense and required pension contributions over the next several years. ~~The decrease~~However, the impact of these favorable returns will be offset by the impact of the lower discount rate for expense in ~~global defined benefit pension assets in 2008 is expected~~2010, compared to ~~increase pension expense by approximately $15 million in 2009 and may increase pension expense even further in years after~~ 2009. Returns for the Company’s U.S. defined benefit plan pension ~~plan~~ assets for the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2009~~2010 were approximately ~~20%~~4%, ~~primarily~~ due to the continued strong performance in the global equity markets.

During the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2009,~~2010, the Company ~~did not purchase any~~purchased 500,000 shares of ~~its~~ common stock ~~as authorized~~for approximately $14.0 million under the Company’s 2006 common stock purchase plan. This plan authorizes the Company to buy, in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions, up to four million shares of common stock, which are to be held as treasury shares and used for specified purposes, up to an aggregate of $180 million. The authorization expires on December 31, 2012.

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements with unconsolidated entities or other persons.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements:

In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued final accounting rules that established the Accounting Standards Codification as a single source of authoritative accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (U.S. GAAP) recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), as well as interpretive releases are also sources of authoritative U.S. GAAP for SEC registrants. The new accounting ~~rules established two levels of U.S. GAAP — authoritative and non authoritative. The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC~~guidance that amends the accounting and ~~reporting standards and was effective~~disclosure requirements for the ~~Company beginning July 1, 2009.~~consolidation of variable interest entities. The ~~Codification was not intended to change or alter existing U.S. GAAP, and as a result,~~implementation of the new accounting ~~rules establishing the Accounting Standards Codification did not have an impact on results of operations and financial condition.~~

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)~~

In September 2006, the FASB issued accounting rules concerning fair value measurements. The new accounting rules establish a framework for measuring fair value that is based on the assumptions market participants would use when pricing an asset or liability and establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the informationguidance related to develop those assumptions. Additionally, the new rules expand the disclosures about fair value measurements to include separately disclosing the fair value measurements of assets or liabilities within each level of the fair value hierarchy. In February 2008, the FASB delayed the effective date for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The implementation of new accounting rules for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities,variable interest entities, effective January 1, ~~2009,~~2010, did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

In December 2007, the FASB issued new accounting rules on noncontrolling interests. The new accounting rules establish requirements for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the Company (sometimes called “minority interests”) to be clearly identified, presented, and disclosed in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent’s equity. All changes in the parent’s ownership interests are required to be accounted for consistently as equity transactions and any noncontrolling equity investments in deconsolidated subsidiaries must be measured initially at fair value. The new accounting rules on noncontrolling interests are effective, on a prospective basis, for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. However, presentation and disclosure requirements must be retrospectively applied to comparative financial statements. The implementation of new accounting rules on noncontrolling interests, effective January 1, 2009, did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

In March 2008, the FASB issued new accounting rules about derivative instruments and hedging activities, which amended previous accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. The new accounting rules require entities to provide greater transparency through additional disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. The new accounting rules are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The implementation of the new accounting rules on derivative instruments and hedging activities, effective January 1, 2009, expanded the disclosures on derivative instruments and related hedged item and did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition. See Note 16 — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities for the expanded disclosures.

In May 2009, the FASB issued new accounting rules for subsequent events. The new accounting rules establish general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. The new accounting rules are effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009 and were adopted by the Company in the first quarter of 2009. The adoption of the new accounting rules for subsequent events did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

~~Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:~~

In December 2008, the FASB issued new accounting rules on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. The new accounting rules require the disclosure of additional information about investment allocation, fair values of major categories of assets, development of fair value measurements and concentrations of risk. The new accounting rules are effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of the new accounting rules on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

4432

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates:

The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the periods presented. The Company reviews its critical accounting policies throughout the year. Except for the following critical accounting ~~policies~~policy on Inventory, ~~and Goodwill,~~ the Company has concluded that there have been no changes to its critical accounting policies or estimates, as described in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008,~~2009, during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2009.~~March 31, 2010.

Inventory:

Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market, with approximately 48% valued by the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method and the remaining 52% valued by the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. The majority of the Company’s domestic inventories are valued by the LIFO method and all of the Company’s international (outside the United States) inventories are valued by the FIFO method. An actual valuation of the inventory under the LIFO method can be made only at the end of each year based on the inventory levels and costs at that time. Accordingly, interim LIFO calculations must be based on management’s estimates of expected year-end inventory levels and costs. Because these are subject to many factors beyond management’s control, annual results may differ from interim results as they are subject to the final year-end LIFO inventory valuation. The ~~Company’s Steel segment~~Company recognized ~~$20.3~~$6.1 million in LIFO ~~income~~expense for the ~~nine months~~first quarter ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, compared to LIFO ~~expense~~income of ~~$27.3~~$11.8 million for the ~~nine months~~first quarter ended ~~September 30, 2008.~~March 31, 2009. Based on current expectations of inventory levels and costs, the ~~Steel segment~~Company expects to recognize approximately ~~$25 million to $30~~$22 million in LIFO ~~income~~expense for the year ended December 31, ~~2009.~~2010. The expected ~~reduction~~increase in the LIFO reserve for ~~2009~~2010 is a result of ~~lower~~higher costs, especially scrap steel costs, as well as ~~lower inventory~~higher quantities. A 1.0% increase in costs would ~~reduce~~increase the current LIFO ~~income~~expense estimate for ~~2009~~2010 by ~~$1.5~~$4.2 million. A 1.0% increase in inventory quantities would ~~reduce~~increase the current LIFO ~~income~~expense estimate for ~~2009~~2010 by ~~$0.7~~$0.4 million.

~~Goodwill:~~

The Company tests goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment at least annually. The Company performs its annual impairment test during the fourth quarter after the annual forecasting process is completed. Furthermore, goodwill is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Each interim period, management of the Company assesses whether or not an indicator of impairment is present that would necessitate that a goodwill impairment analysis be performed in an interim period other than during the fourth quarter.

The goodwill impairment analysis is a two-step process. Step one compares the carrying amount of the reporting unit to its estimated fair value. To the extent that the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, step two is performed, where the reporting unit’s carrying value of goodwill is compared to the implied fair value of goodwill. To the extent that the carrying value of goodwill exceeds the implied fair value of goodwill, impairment exists and must be recognized.

The Company reviews goodwill for impairment at the reporting unit level. The Company’s reporting units are the same as its reportable segments: Mobile Industries, Process Industries, Aerospace and Defense and Steel. The Company prepares its goodwill impairment analysis by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit, using an income approach (a discounted cash flow model) as well as a market approach, with its carrying value. The income approach and the market approach are equally weighted in arriving at fair value, which the Company has applied consistently.

The discounted cash flow model requires several assumptions including future sales growth, EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes) margins and capital expenditures. The Company’s four reporting units each provide their forecast of results for the next three years. These forecasts are the basis for the information used in the discounted cash flow model. The discounted cash flow model also requires the use of a discount rate and a terminal revenue growth rate (the revenue growth rate for the period beyond the three years forecasted by the reporting units), as well as projections of future operating margins (for the period beyond the forecasted three years). During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company used a discount rate for each of its four reporting units ranging from 11% to 12% and a terminal revenue growth rate ranging from 2% to 3%. The difference in the discount rates and terminal revenue growth rates is based on the underlying markets and risks associated with each of the Company’s reporting units.

The market approach requires several assumptions including sales multiples and EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiples for comparable companies that operate in the same markets as the Company’s reporting units. During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company used sales multiples for its four reporting units ranging from 0.4 to 1.0 and EBITDA multiples ranging from 3.8 to 8.0. The difference in the sales multiples and the EBITDA multiples is due to the underlying markets associated with each of the Company’s reporting units.

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)~~

As a result of the goodwill impairment analysis performed during the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company recognized a goodwill impairment loss of $48.8 million for the Mobile Industries segment in its financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008. The fair value of each of the Company’s other reporting units exceeded its carrying value. As of December 31, 2008, the Company had $230.0 million of goodwill on its Consolidated Balance Sheet, of which $167.6 million was attributable to the Aerospace and Defense segment. See Note 8 — Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in the Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008 for carrying amount of goodwill by segment. The Aerospace and Defense segment is the only reporting unit in which the fair value of the reporting unit did not exceed the carrying value of the reporting unit by more than 10%. The fair value of this reporting unit was $445.9 million compared to a carrying value of $436.2 million. A 40 basis point increase in the discount rate would have resulted in the Aerospace and Defense segment failing step one of the goodwill impairment analysis, which would have required the completion of step two of the goodwill impairment analysis to arrive at a potential goodwill impairment loss. A 450 basis point decrease in the projected cash flows would have resulted in the Aerospace and Defense segment failing step one of the goodwill impairment analysis, which would have required the completion of step two of the goodwill impairment analysis to arrive at a potential goodwill impairment loss.

Other Matters:

Foreign Currency:

Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries are translated at the rate of exchange in effect on the balance sheet date; income and expenses are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the quarter. Related translation adjustments are reflected as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Foreign currency gains and losses resulting from transactions are included in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

Foreign currency exchange losses included in the Company’s operating results for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 were ~~$2.5~~$1.6 million, compared to a gain of ~~$2.4~~$7.6 million during the three months ended September 30, 2008. Foreign currency exchange gains included in the Company’s operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 were $2.9 million, compared to a gain of $0.9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2008.March 31, 2009. For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2009,~~March 31, 2010, the Company recorded a ~~positive~~negative non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of ~~$31.8~~$13.2 million that ~~increased~~decreased shareholders’ equity, compared to a negative non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of ~~$106.9~~$44.5 million that decreased shareholders’ equity for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2008. For the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company recorded a positive non-cash~~March 31, 2009. The foreign currency translation adjustment of $54.3 million that increased shareholders’ equity, compared to a negative non-cash foreign currency translation adjustment of $65.7 million that decreased shareholders’ equity in the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The foreign currency translation adjustments for the three months ~~and nine months~~ ended ~~September 30, 2009 were positively~~March 31, 2010 was negatively impacted by the ~~weakening~~strengthening of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies, such as the ~~Brazilian real,~~Euro, the Romanian lei and the British ~~pound, the South African rand, the Czech Republic koruna~~pound.

Management’s Discussion and ~~the Euro.~~

~~New Labor Contract:~~

~~On November 1, 2009, the Company reached a new four-year agreement with the United Steelworkers~~Analysis of ~~America. The contract went into effect immediately~~Financial Condition and ~~expires September 30, 2013. The new contract covers approximately 2,300 associates at the Company’s steel and bearing plants in the Canton, Ohio area.~~Results of Operations (continued)

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements set forth in this document (including the Company’s forecasts, beliefs and expectations) that are not historical in nature are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In particular, the Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains numerous forward-looking statements. The Company cautions readers that actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Company due to a variety of important factors, such as:

continued weakness in world economic conditions, including additional adverse effects from the global economic slowdown, terrorism or hostilities. This includes, but is not limited to, political risks associated with the potential instability of governments and legal systems in countries in which the Company or its customers conduct business, and changes in currency valuations;


b)		the effects of fluctuations in customer demand on sales, product mix and prices in the industries in which the Company operates. This includes the ability of the Company to respond to the rapid changes in customer demand, the effects of customer bankruptcies or liquidations, the impact of changes in industrial business cycles and whether conditions of fair trade continue in the U.S. markets;


c)		competitive factors, including changes in market penetration, increasing price competition by existing or new foreign and domestic competitors, the introduction of new products by existing and new competitors and new technology that may impact the way the Company’s products are sold or distributed;

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (continued)~~


d)		changes in operating costs. This includes: the effect of changes in the Company’s manufacturing processes; changes in costs associated with varying levels of operations and manufacturing capacity; higher cost and availability of raw materials and energy; the Company’s ability to mitigate the impact of fluctuations in raw materials and energy costs and the operation of the Company’s surcharge mechanism; changes in the expected costs associated with product warranty claims; changes resulting from inventory management and cost reduction initiatives and different levels of customer demands; the effects of unplanned work stoppages; and changes in the cost of labor and benefits;


e)		the success of the Company’s operating plans, including its ability to achieve the benefits from its ongoing continuous improvement and rationalization programs; the ability of acquired companies to achieve satisfactory operating results; and the Company’s ability to maintain appropriate relations with unions that represent Company associates in certain locations in order to avoid disruptions of business;


f)		unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments. This includes, but is not limited to, claims or problems related to intellectual property, product liability or warranty, environmental issues, and taxes;


g)		changes in worldwide financial markets, including availability of financing and interest rates to the extent they affect the Company’s ability to raise capital or increase the Company’s cost of funds, including the ability to refinance its unsecured notes, have an impact on the overall performance of the Company’s pension fund investments and/or cause changes in the global economy and financial markets which affect customer demand and the ability of customers to obtain financing to purchase the Company’s products or equipment which contains the Company’s products; and


h)		~~the Company’s ability to successfully complete the sale of its Needle Roller Bearings operations; and~~

those items identified under Item 1A. Risk Factors in this document ~~in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009~~ and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008.~~2009.

Additional risks relating to the Company’s business, the industries in which the Company operates or the Company’s common stock may be described from time to time in the Company’s filings with the SEC. All of these risk factors are difficult to predict, are subject to material uncertainties that may affect actual results and may be beyond the Company’s control.

Except as required by the federal securities laws, the Company undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

4734

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Refer to information appearing under the caption “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Form 10-Q. Furthermore, a discussion of market risk exposures is included in Part II, Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk, of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2008.~~2009. There have been no material changes in reported market risk since the inclusion of this discussion in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K referenced above.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

	(a)		Disclosure Controls and Procedures

			As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

	(b)		Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

			During the Company’s most recent fiscal quarter, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

4835

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a materially adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2008 and Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2009 and June 30,~~ 2009 included a detailed discussion of our risk factors. The information presented below amends and updates those risk factors and should be read in conjunction with the risk factors and information disclosed in the Form ~~10-K and the Forms 10-Q.~~

Continued weakness in either global economic conditions or in any of the industries in which our customers operate or sustained uncertainty in financial markets could adversely impact our revenues and profitability by reducing demand and margins.

Our results of operations may be materially affected by the conditions in the global economy generally and in global capital markets. The current global economic downturn has caused extreme volatility in the capital markets and in the end markets in which our customers operate. Our revenues may be negatively affected by continued reduced customer demand, additional changes in the product mix and negative pricing pressure in the industries in which we operate. Margins in those industries are highly sensitive to demand cycles, and our customers in those industries historically have tended to delay large capital projects, including expensive maintenance and upgrades, during economic downturns. As a result, our revenues and earnings are impacted by overall levels of industrial production.

Our results of operations may be materially affected by the conditions in the global financial markets. If an end user cannot obtain financing to purchase our products, either directly or indirectly contained in machinery or equipment, demand for our products will be reduced, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and earnings.

Certain automotive industry companies are experiencing significant financial downturns. While recent bankruptcies of certain automotive industry companies did not result in any material losses to the Company, if any other automotive industry customers become insolvent or file for bankruptcy, our ability to recover accounts receivable from that customer would be adversely affected and any payment we received during the preference period prior to a bankruptcy filing may be potentially recoverable by the bankruptcy estate. Furthermore, if certain of our automotive industry customers liquidate in bankruptcy, we may incur impairment charges relating to obsolete inventory and machinery and equipment. In addition, financial instability of certain companies that participate in the automotive industry supply chain could disrupt production in the industry. A disruption of production in the automotive industry could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and earnings.

~~We may incur further impairment and restructuring charges that could materially affect our profitability.~~

We have taken approximately $243 million in impairment and restructuring charges, during the last four years, for the Canton bearing operations, Mobile Industries segment, Bearings and Power Transmission Group and employment and other cost reduction initiatives. We expect to take additional charges in connection with the Canton bearing operations, the Mobile Industries segment, and the employment and cost reduction initiatives. Continued weakness in business or economic conditions, or changes in our business strategy, may result in additional restructuring programs and may require us to take additional charges in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our earnings.

~~The unprecedented conditions in the financial and credit markets may affect the availability and cost of credit.~~

The financial and credit markets are experiencing unprecedented levels of volatility and disruption, which has impacted the general availability of credit and resulted in significantly higher financing costs. If we are unable to obtain credit as we need it, our liquidity and ability to operate our business may be adversely impacted.10-K.

We may not be able to ~~maintain compliance with~~realize the ~~covenants contained~~anticipated benefits from, or successfully execute, Project O.N.E.

In 2005, we began implementing Project O.N.E., a multi-year program designed to improve business processes and systems to deliver enhanced customer service and financial performance. From 2007 to 2009, we completed the installation of Project O.N.E. in most of our Bearings & Power Transmission operations located in the United States, Europe and India. In May 2010, we began to implement Project O.N.E. in certain parts of our Aerospace & Defense segment and other manufacturing and distribution operations in Asia, Europe and Australia. If we are not successful in executing or operating under Project O.N.E., or if it fails to achieve the anticipated results, then our operations, margins, sales and reputation could be adversely affected.

Implementing, and operating under, Project O.N.E. will be complex and time-consuming, may be distracting to management and disruptive to our businesses, and may cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, our ~~debt agreement~~.

~~We reported~~businesses as a ~~net loss for the third quarter and first nine months~~result of ~~2009. The U.S. and global industrial manufacturing downturn deepened during 2009 and contributed to~~ a decrease in our sales and profitability. We cannot foresee whether our operations will generate sufficient revenue for us to attain profitability in the future, and we may not be able to reduce fixed costs sufficiently to improve our operating ratios.

In addition, our new Senior Credit Facility contains financial covenants that require us to achieve certain financial and operating results and maintain compliance with specified financial ratios. In particular, our new Senior Credit Facility contains requirements relating to a maximum consolidated leverage ratio, a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio and a minimum consolidated net worth. These covenants could, among other things, limit our ability to borrow against the new Senior Credit Facility or other facilities. Further, our ability to meet the financial covenants or requirements in our new Senior Credit Facility may be affected by events beyond our control, and we may not be able to satisfynumber of obstacles, such covenants and requirements. A breach of these covenants or our inability to comply with the financial ratios, tests or other restrictions could result in an event of default under our new Senior Credit Facility, which in turn could result in an event of default under the terms of our other indebtedness. Upon the occurrence of an event of default under our new Senior Credit Facility, after the expiration of any grace periods, the lenders could elect to declare all amounts outstanding under our new Senior Credit Facility, together with accrued interest, to be immediately due and payable. If this happens, our assets may not be sufficient to repay in full the payments due under that facility or our other indebtedness.

~~In addition, if we are unable to service our indebtedness or fund our operating costs, we will be forced to adopt alternative strategies that may include:~~as:

	•		~~further reducing~~the loss of key associates or ~~delaying capital expenditures;~~customers;

	•		~~seeking additional debt financing or equity capital, possibly at a higher cost~~the failure to ~~us or~~maintain the quality of customer service that we have ~~other terms that are less attractive to us than would otherwise be the case;~~historically provided;

	•		~~selling assets;~~the need to coordinate geographically diverse organizations; and

	•		~~restructuring or refinancing debt, which may increase further~~the resulting diversion of management’s attention from our ~~financing costs; or~~

	•		~~curtailing or eliminating certain activities.~~day-to-day business and the need to dedicate additional management personnel to address obstacles to the implementation of Project O.N.E.

~~Moreover,~~If we ~~may~~are not ~~be able~~successful in executing, or operating under, Project O.N.E., or if it fails to ~~implement any of these strategies on satisfactory terms, if at all.~~

~~Work stoppages or similar difficulties could significantly disrupt~~achieve the anticipated results, then our operations, ~~reduce our revenues~~margins, sales and ~~materially affect our earnings.~~

~~A work stoppage at one or more of our facilities~~reputation could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, if one or more of our customers were to experience a work stoppage, that customer would likely halt or limit purchases of our products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.be adversely affected.

5036

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Issuer of Purchases of Common Stock

The following table provides information about purchases by the Company during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2009~~March 31, 2010 of its common stock.

Total number Maximum
of shares number of
purchased as shares that
part of publicly may yet
Total number Average announced be purchased
of shares price paid plans or under the plans
Period purchased⁽¹⁾ per share⁽²⁾ programs or programs⁽³⁾

07/01/09 - 07/31/09 513 $ 17.32 — 4,000,000
08/01/09 - 08/31/09 815 20.64 — 4,000,000
09/01/09 - 09/30/09 393 21.58 — 4,000,000

Total 1,721 $ 19.87 — 4,000,000


					Total number		Maximum
					of shares		number of
					purchased as		shares that
					part of publicly		may yet
	Total number		Average		announced		be purchased
	of shares		price paid		plans or		under the plans
Period	purchased⁽¹⁾		per share⁽²⁾		programs		or programs⁽³⁾


1/1/10 - 1/31/10		10,539	$	24.09		—		4,000,000
2/1/10 - 2/28/10		91,639		23.62		—		4,000,000
3/1/10 - 3/31/10		504,724		27.97		500,000		3,500,000

Total		606,902	$	27.25		500,000		3,500,000


⁽¹⁾		~~Represents~~With respect to the shares purchased in January and February and 4,724 shares purchased in March, amounts present shares of the ~~company’s~~Company’s common stock that are owned and tendered by employees to exercise stock options, and to satisfy ~~tax~~ withholding obligations in connection with the exercise of stock options and vesting of restricted ~~shares and the exercise of stock options.~~shares.

⁽²⁾		For shares tendered in connection with the vesting of restricted shares, the average price paid per share is an average calculated using the daily high and low of the ~~company’s~~Company’s common stock as quoted on the New York Stock Exchange at the time of vesting. For shares tendered in connection with the exercise of stock options, the price paid is the real time trading stock price at the time the options are exercised.

⁽³⁾		Pursuant to the ~~company’s~~Company’s 2006 common stock purchase plan, the ~~company~~Company may purchase up to four million shares of common stock at an amount not to exceed $180 million in the aggregate. The ~~company~~Company may purchase shares under its 2006 common stock purchase plan until December 31, 2012. The Company may purchase shares from time to time in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The Company may make all or part of the purchases pursuant to accelerated share repurchases or Rule 1065-1 plans.

Item 6. Exhibits

	10.1		~~First Supplemental Indenture, dated as~~Form of ~~September 14, 2009,~~Performance Unit Agreement was filed on March 30, 2010 with Form 8-K (Commission File No. 1-1169) and incorporated herein by ~~and between The Timken Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee~~reference.

	12		Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

	31.1		Certification of James W. Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	31.2		Certification of Glenn A. Eisenberg, Executive Vice President —– Finance and Administration (principal financial officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32		Certifications of James W. Griffith, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Glenn A. Eisenberg, Executive Vice President —– Finance and Administration (principal financial officer) of The Timken Company, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

5137

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	THE TIMKEN COMPANY
Date ~~November 9, 2009~~May 5, 2010	By	/s/ James W. Griffith
		James W. Griffith
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

Date ~~November 9, 2009~~May 5, 2010	By	/s/ Glenn A. Eisenberg
		Glenn A. Eisenberg
		Executive Vice President — Finance and Administration (Principal Financial Officer)


	Fair Value at September 30, 2009								Total Gains
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		(Losses)

Assets:
Long-lived assets held for sale	$	301,033	$	—	$	—	$	301,033	$	(38,087	)
Long-lived assets held and used		3,537		—		—		3,537		(32,515	)

Total Assets	$	304,570	$	—	$	—	$	304,570	$	(70,602	)


	Carrying		Fair Value			Fair Value at
	Value		Adjustment			Sept. 30, 2009

Long-lived assets held for sale:
Net assets of the NRB operations	$	334,728	$	(33,695	)	$	301,033
Torrington campus office complex		4,392		(4,392	)		—

Total long-lived assets held for sale:	$	339,120	$	(38,087	)	$	301,033



Long-lived assets held and used:
Process Industries’ facilities	$	29,815	$	(27,652	)	$	2,163
Torrington campus office complex		1,984		(1,984	)		—
Endorsia.com International AB		2,346		(1,346	)		1,000
Other assets		1,907		(1,533	)		374

Total long-lived assets held and used:	$	36,052	$	(32,515	)	$	3,537


						Amount of gain or (loss)
	Amount of gain or					reclassified from AOCI
	(loss) recognized in					into income (effective
	OCI on derivative					portion)
	Nine Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships	2009		2008			2009			2008

Foreign currency forward contracts	$	250	$	(4,761	)	$	(1,670	)	$	(200	)

Total	$	250	$	(4,761	)	$	(1,670	)	$	(200	)


	September 30, 2009		December 31, 2008

Assets:
Accounts receivable, net	$	25,799	$	33,482
Inventories		114,827		145,201
Deferred charges and prepaid expenses		399		2,782
Other current assets		2,154		1,396
Property, plant and equipment — net		193,263		226,895
Goodwill		—		8,614
Other intangible assets		26,638		32,806
Other non-current assets		1,414		1,310

Total assets, discontinued operations	$	364,494	$	452,486

Liabilities:
Accounts payable and other liabilities	$	16,757	$	19,907
Salaries, wages and benefits		1,680		1,605
Accrued pension cost		15,790		14,026
Deferred income taxes		1,848		1,848
Other non-current liabilities		8,106		7,986

Total liabilities, discontinued operations	$	44,181	$	45,372


Rollforward of Restructuring Accruals:

	Sept. 30, 2009			Dec. 31, 2008

(Dollars in millions)
Beginning balance, January 1	$	17.0		$	19.0
Expense		47.7			12.7
Payments		(29.8	)		(14.7	)

Ending balance	$	34.9		$	17.0


Corporate Expense:
	3Q 2009			3Q 2008			$ Change			Change

(Dollars in millions)

Corporate Expense	$	10.3		$	19.0		$	(8.7	)		(45.8	)%
Corporate expense % to net sales		1.4	%		1.4	%		—		0		bps

Large accelerated filerþ

Accelerated filero

Non-accelerated filero

Smaller reporting companyo

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

~~Smaller reporting company~~ o