UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010


o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-32869

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware		~~01-0824791~~
(State or other jurisdiction of		~~(I.R.S. Employer~~
incorporation or organization)		01-0824791 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3190 Fairview Park Drive, Suite 700, Falls Church, Virginia 22042
(571) 722-0210
(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code,
of registrant’s principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yeso Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filero	Accelerated filerþ	Non-accelerated filero	Smaller reporting companyo
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yeso Noþ

As of ~~November 3, 2009,~~February 4, 2010, the registrant had ~~56,273,575~~56,285,726 shares of its Class A common stock outstanding.

Disclosure Regarding Forward-Looking Information

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains various forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Forward-looking statements, written, oral or otherwise made, represent our expectation or belief concerning future events. Without limiting the foregoing, the words “believes,” “thinks,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “expects” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties. Statements regarding the amount of our backlog, estimated remaining contract values and estimated total contract values are other examples of forward-looking statements. We caution that these statements are further qualified by important economic, competitive, governmental or internal and technological factors that could cause our business, strategy or actual results or events to differ materially, or otherwise, from those in the forward-looking statements. These factors, risks and uncertainties include, among others, the following: the future impact of acquisitions, joint ventures or teaming agreements; our substantial level of indebtedness; the outcome of any material litigation, government ~~or internal~~ investigation or other regulatory ~~matter;~~matters; policy and/or spending changes implemented by the Obama administration; termination or modification of key U.S. government contracts; changes in the demand for services that we ~~provide;~~provide or work awarded under our contracts, including without limitation, the Civilian Police, International Narcotics and Law Enforcement, Worldwide Personnel Protection Services (“WPPS”) and Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (“LOGCAP IV”) contracts; pursuit of new commercial business in the U.S. and abroad; activities of competitors; bid protests; changes in significant operating expenses; changes in availability of or cost of capital; general political, economic and business conditions in the United States (“U.S.”); acts of war or terrorist activities; variations in performance of financial markets; the inherent difficulties of estimating future contract revenue; changes in anticipated revenue from indefinite delivery, indefinite quantity contracts; changes in expected percentages of future revenue represented by fixed-price and time-and-materials contracts, including increased competition with respect to task orders subject to such contracts; and statements covering our business strategy, those described in “Risk Factors” and other risks detailed from time to time in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, such forward-looking statements do not purport to be predictions of future events or circumstances and therefore there can be no assurance that any forward-looking statement contained herein will prove to be accurate. We assume no obligation to update the forward-looking statements.

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION


ITEM 1.		FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Three Months Ended
	October 2, 2009			October 3, 2008			January 1, 2010			January 2, 2009

Revenue	$	821,372		$	779,151		$	914,970		$	792,327

Cost of services		(727,279	)		(696,519	)		(822,700	)		(704,210	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(31,304	)		(25,994	)		(32,350	)		(26,505	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(10,238	)		(10,005	)		(10,530	)		(10,029	)

Operating income		52,551			46,633			49,390			51,583
Interest expense		(13,691	)		(14,905	)		(13,655	)		(15,322	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(162	)		(4,443	)
Earnings from affiliates		1,527			1,523			1,278			1,319
Interest income		103			677			67			730
Other (loss)/income, net		(12	)		960
Other income (loss), net								285			(856	)

Income before income taxes		40,316			30,445			37,365			37,454
Provision for income taxes		(13,301	)		(9,131	)		(10,493	)		(11,639	)

Net income		27,015			21,314			26,872			25,815
Noncontrolling interests		(6,460	)		(8,443	)		(6,444	)		(6,062	)

Net income attributable to DynCorp International Inc.	$	20,555		$	12,871		$	20,428		$	19,753


Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.37		$	0.23
Basic earnings per share							$	0.36		$	0.35
Diluted earnings per share							$	0.36		$	0.34

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)


	For the Six Months Ended						For the Nine Months Ended
	October 2, 2009			October 3, 2008			January 1, 2010			January 2, 2009

Revenue	$	1,606,549		$	1,495,945		$	2,521,519		$	2,288,272

Cost of services		(1,426,372	)		(1,334,908	)		(2,249,072	)		(2,039,118	)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(54,742	)		(53,845	)		(87,092	)		(80,350	)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(20,383	)		(20,565	)		(30,913	)		(30,594	)

Operating income		105,052			86,627			154,442			138,210
Interest expense		(28,301	)		(29,120	)		(41,956	)		(44,442	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(146	)		(4,443	)		(146	)		(4,443	)
Earnings from affiliates		2,581			2,640			3,859			3,959
Interest income		442			1,021			509			1,751
Other (loss)/income, net		(241	)		1,665
Other income, net								44			809

Income before income taxes		79,387			58,390			116,752			95,844
Provision for income taxes		(25,928	)		(18,447	)		(36,421	)		(30,086	)

Net income		53,459			39,943			80,331			65,758
Noncontrolling interests		(12,259	)		(9,092	)		(18,703	)		(15,154	)

Net income attributable to DynCorp International Inc.	$	41,200		$	30,851		$	61,628		$	50,604


Basic and diluted earnings per share	$	0.73		$	0.54
Basic earnings per share							$	1.10		$	0.89
Diluted earnings per share							$	1.09		$	0.88

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands, except share data)


		As of							As of
		October 2, 2009			April 3, 2009				January 1, 2010			April 3, 2009
ASSETS	ASSETS							ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	132,084		$	200,222			$	67,082		$	200,222
Restricted cash			15,990			5,935				24,490			5,935
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $348 and $68, respectively			636,352			564,432
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $74 and $68, respectively										781,047			564,432
Prepaid expenses and other current assets			116,277			124,214				108,631			124,214

Total current assets	��		900,703			894,803				981,250			894,803
Property and equipment, net			54,166			18,338				54,518			18,338
Goodwill			420,180			420,180				448,356			420,180
Tradename			18,318			18,318				18,683			18,318
Other intangibles, net			125,377			142,719				127,973			142,719
Deferred income taxes			9,530			12,788				3,348			12,788
Other assets, net			30,177			32,068				32,378			32,068

Total assets		$	1,558,451		$	1,539,214			$	1,666,506		$	1,539,214

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY							LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt		$	14,137		$	30,540			$	29,137		$	30,540
Accounts payable			213,699			160,419				284,178			160,419
Accrued payroll and employee costs			113,275			137,993				121,825			137,993
Deferred income taxes			14,700			8,278				12,210			8,278
Other accrued liabilities			108,390			111,590				112,080			111,590
Income taxes payable			3,843			5,986				4,408			5,986

Total current liabilities			468,044			454,806				563,838			454,806
Long-term debt, less current portion			537,887			569,372				522,949			569,372
Other long-term liabilities			6,101			6,779				11,633			6,779

Total liabilities			1,012,032			1,030,957				1,098,420			1,030,957

Commitments and contingencies										—			—

Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value — 232,000,000 shares authorized; 57,000,000 shares issued and 56,273,575 and 56,306,800 shares outstanding, respectively			570			570
Additional paid-in capital			367,225			366,620
Common stock, $0.01 par value - 232,000,000 shares authorized; 57,000,000 shares issued and 56,285,726 and 56,306,800 shares outstanding, respectively										570			570
Additional paid in capital										367,228			366,620
Retained earnings			184,573			143,373				205,001			143,373
Treasury shares, 726,425 shares and 693,200 shares, respectively			(9,085	)		(8,618	)
Treasury shares, 714,274 shares and 693,200 shares, respectively										(8,948	)		(8,618	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(3,257	)		(4,424	)			(2,090	)		(4,424	)

Total shareholders’ equity attributable to DynCorp International Inc.			540,026			497,521				561,761			497,521
Noncontrolling interests			6,393			10,736				6,325			10,736

Total equity			546,419			508,257				568,086			508,257

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity		$	1,558,451		$	1,539,214			$	1,666,506		$	1,539,214

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Dollars in thousands)


							For the Nine Months Ended
	For the Six Months Ended						January 1, 2010			January 2, 2009
	October 2, 2009			October 3, 2008
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	53,459		$	39,943		$	80,331		$	65,758
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		20,979			21,087			31,736			31,388
Amortization of deferred loan costs		1,969			1,723			2,931			2,696
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		146			4,443			146			4,443
Recovery for losses on accounts receivable		(12	)		(173	)		(12	)		(283	)
Equity-based compensation		2,171			1,225
Equity based compensation								2,536			2,385
Loss on disposition of assets, net		453			—			(34	)		—
Earnings from affiliates		(2,581	)		(2,640	)		(3,859	)		(3,959	)
Distributions from affiliates		1,725			1,385			1,725			2,439
Deferred income taxes		13,540			(4,112	)		12,860			32,193
Other		195			(304	)		33			(772	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash		(10,055	)		7,326			(18,555	)		8,429
Accounts receivable		(71,908	)		(64,104	)		(208,696	)		(121,329	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		7,054			(26,070	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets								12,775			(20,711	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		21,519			54,096			105,354			68,957
Income taxes payable		(5,276	)		4,128			( 3,692	)		(1,439	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		33,378			37,953			15,579			70,195

Cash flows from investing activities
Cash paid for acquisition, net of cash acquired								(37,905	)		—
Purchase of property and equipment		(34,687	)		(2,303	)		(37,830	)		(3,407	)
Purchase of computer software		(1,635	)		(1,212	)		(1,615	)		(1,634	)
Change in cash restricted as collateral on letters of credit		—			(16,568	)		—			(15,160	)
Other		60			365
Other investing activities								60			(1,869	)

Net cash (used in) investing activities		(36,262	)		(19,718	)		(77,290	)		(22,070	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Borrowings on long-term debt		—			323,751			51,500			323,751
Payments on long-term debt		(48,626	)		(301,129	)		(100,126	)		(301,129	)
Purchases of treasury stock		(712	)		—			(712	)		—
Borrowings under other financing arrangements		—			16,158			—			4,299
Payments of deferred financing cost		13			(9,645	)		13			(9,834	)
Payments of dividends to noncontrolling interests		(15,936	)		—			(22,067	)		—
Other financing activities		7			30			(37	)		(11	)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(65,254	)		29,165			(71,429	)		17,076

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(68,138	)		47,400			(133,140	)		65,201
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		200,222			85,379			200,222			85,379

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	132,084		$	132,779		$	67,082		$	150,580

Income taxes paid, net of refunds	$	9,848		$	18,965		$	18,409		$	18,622
Interest paid	$	27,103		$	30,054		$	31,103		$	34,354
Non-cash investing activities	$	3,394		$	10,722		$	—		$	8,296
Non-cash dividends							$	1,047		$	—

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL INC.

UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

For the nine months ended January 2, 2009
(Dollars and ~~Shares~~shares in thousands)


														Accumulated			Total Shareholders’																					Other			Total Shareholders
						Additional								Other			Equity Attributable																					Accumulated			Equity Attributable
						Paid in		Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive			to DynCorp			Noncontrolling										Additional Paid			Retained			Treasury		Comprehensive			to DynCorp			Noncontrolling			Total
	Common Stock					Capital		Earnings			Shares			Income (Loss)			International Inc.			Interests			Total Equity			Common Stock				in Capital			Earnings			Shares		Income (Loss)			International lnc.			Interests			Equity
Balance at April 3, 2009		56,307		$	570	$	366,620	$	143,373		$	(8,618	)	$	(4,424	)	$	497,521		$	10,736		$	508,257

Balance at March 28, 2008																											57,000	$	570	$	357,026		$	73,603		$	—	$	(6,914	)	$	424,285		$	—		$	424,285
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income							—		53,459						—			53,459			—			53,459							—			65,758			—		—			65,758			—			65,758
Interest rate swap, net of tax							—		—			—			769			769			—			769							—			—			—		1,710			1,710			—			1,710
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax							—		—			—			398			398			—			398							—			—			—		(634	)		(634	)		—			(634	)

Comprehensive income							—		53,459			—			1,167			54,626			—			54,626							—			65,758			—		1,076			66,834			—			66,834
Noncontrolling interests									(12,259	)		—						(12,259	)					(12,259	)						—			(15,154	)		—		—			(15,154	)		—			(15,154	)

Comprehensive income attributable to DynCorp International Inc.									41,200			—			1,167			42,367			—			42,367							—			50,604			—		1,076			51,680			—			51,680
Net Income and comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests									—			—			—			—			12,259			12,259							—			—			—		—			—			15,154			15,154
Equity-based compensation																															575			—			—		—			575			—			575
Tax benefit associated with equity-based compensation																															(10	)		—			—		—			(10	)		—			(10	)
Sale of noncontrolling interests of DIFZ																															8,190			—			—		—			8,190			—			8,190
DIFZ financing, net of tax							189		—			—			—			189			—			189							106			—			—		—			106			—			106
Treasury share repurchases		(55	)				—		—			(712	)		—			(712	)		—			(712	)
Treasury shares issued to settle RSU liability		22					55		—			245			—			300			—			300
Equity-based compensation							354		—			—			—			354			—			354
Tax benefit reduction associated with equity-based compensation							7		—			—			—			7			—			7
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interests							—		—			—			—			—			(16,602	)		(16,602	)						—			—			—		—			—			(3,306	)		(3,306	)

Balance at October 2, 2009		56,274		$	570	$	367,225	$	184,573		$	(9,085	)	$	(3,257	)	$	540,026		$	6,393		$	546,419
Balance at January 2, 2009																											57,000	$	570	$	365,887		$	124,207		$	—	$	(5,838	)	$	484,826		$	11,848		$	496,674


																		Total Shareholders
															Accumulated			Equity Attributable
						Additional Paid			Retained			Treasury			Comprehensive			to DynCorp			Noncontrolling			Total
	Common Stock					in Capital			Earnings			Shares			Income (Loss)			International lnc.			Interests			Equity
Balance at April 3, 2009		56,307		$	570	$	366,620		$	143,373		$	(8,618	)	$	(4,424	)	$	497,521		$	10,736		$	508,257
Comprehensive income (loss):
Net income							—			80,331			—			—			80,331			—			80,331
Interest rate swap, net of tax							—			—			—			1,985			1,985			—			1,985
Currency translation adjustment, net of tax							—			—			—			349			349			—			349

Comprehensive income							—			80,331			—			2,334			82,665			—			82,665
Noncontrolling interests							—			(18,703	)		—			—			(18,703	)		—			(18,703	)

Comprehensive income attributable to DynCorp International Inc.							—			61,628			—			2,334			63,962			—			63,962
Net Income and comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interests							—			—			—			—			—			18,703			18,703
DIFZ financing, net of tax							298			—			—			—			298			—			298
Treasury shares repurchases		(21	)		—		—			—			(712	)		—			(712	)		—			(712	)
Treasury Shares issued to settle RSU liability							90			—			382			—			472			—			472
Equity-based compensation							257			—			—			—			257			—			257
Tax benefit associated with equity-based compensation							(37	)		—			—			—			(37	)		—			(37	)
Dividends declared to noncontrolling interests										—			—			—			—			(23,114	)		(23,114	)

Balance at January 1, 2010		56,286		$	570	$	367,228		$	205,001		$	(8,948	)	$	(2,090	)	$	561,761		$	6,325		$	568,086

DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1—Basis of Presentation and Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

DynCorp International Inc., through its subsidiaries, is a leading provider of specialized, mission-critical professional and support services for the U.S. military, non-military U.S. governmental agencies and foreign governments. Our specific global expertise is in law enforcement training and support, security services, base and logistics operations, construction management, aviation services and operations and linguist services. References herein to “DynCorp International”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “us” refer to DynCorp International Inc. and its subsidiaries unless otherwise stated or indicated by the context.

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and our domestic and foreign subsidiaries. These consolidated financial statements have been prepared, without audit, pursuant to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, we believe that all disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto included in the Company’s fiscal 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009.

We report our results on a 52/53 week fiscal year with the fiscal year ending on the Friday closest to March 31 of such year (April 2, 2010 for fiscal year 2010 which is a 52 week fiscal year). The three months ended January 1, 2010 was a 13-week period from October 3, 2009 to January 1, 2010. The three months ended January 2, 2009 was a 13-week period from ~~July~~October 4, ~~2009~~2008 to ~~October~~January 2, 2009. The ~~three~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008~~January 1, 2010 was a ~~13-week period from July 5, 2008 to October 3, 2008. The six months ended October 2, 2009 was a 26-week~~39-week period from April 4, 2009 to ~~October 2, 2009.~~January 1, 2010. The ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008~~January 2, 2009 was a ~~27-week~~40-week period from March 29, 2008 to ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009.

In the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary to fairly present our financial position at ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009, the results of operations for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, ~~and October 3, 2008,~~ and cash flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, ~~and October 3, 2008,~~ have been included. The results of operations for the three months and the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year or for any future periods. We use estimates and assumptions required for preparation of the financial statements. The estimates are primarily based on historical experience and business knowledge and are revised as circumstances change. However, actual results could differ from the estimates.

As a result of the implementation of the noncontrolling interest rules in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board Codification (“ASC”) 810 —Consolidation, certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation. This includes moving the $10.7 million noncontrolling interests balance (previously ~~“Minority Interest”~~“minority interest”) as of April 3, 2009 out of the mezzanine section of the balance sheet and into the equity section. Such reclassifications have no impact on previously reported net income attributable to DynCorp International Inc.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of both our domestic and foreign subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. Generally, investments in which we own a 20% to 50% ownership interest are accounted for by the equity method. These investments are in business entities in which we do not have control, but have the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies and are not the primary beneficiary as defined in ASC 810 —Consolidation. We have no investments in business entities of less than 20%.

We have ownership interests in three active joint ventures that are not consolidated into our financial statements as of ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, and are accounted for using the equity method. Economic rights in active joint ventures are indicated by the ownership percentages in the table listed below.


Contingency Response Services LLC	45.0	%
Babcock DynCorp Limited	44.0	%
Partnership for Temporary Housing LLC	40.0	%

The following table sets forth our ownership in joint ventures that are consolidated into our financial statements as of ~~October 2, 2009.~~January 1, 2010. For the entities ~~list~~listed below, we are the primary beneficiary as defined in ASC 810 —Consolidation.


Global Linguist Solutions LLC	51.0	%
DynCorp International FZ-LLC	50.0	%

Noncontrolling Interests

We hold various ownership interests in a number of joint ventures as disclosed in Note 1 to our fiscal 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009. We are required by GAAP to consolidate certain joint ventures for which we do not hold a 100% interest. We record the impact of our joint venture partners’ interests in these consolidated joint ventures as noncontrolling interests. Noncontrolling interests is presented on the face of the income statement as an increase or reduction in arriving at net income attributable to DynCorp International Inc. ~~The presentation of noncontrolling~~Noncontrolling interests on the balance sheet is located in the equity section.

Restricted ~~cash~~Cash

Restricted cash represents cash restricted by certain contracts in which advance payments are not available for use except to pay specified costs and vendors for work performed on the specific contract and cash restricted and invested as collateral as required by our letters of credit. Changes in restricted cash related to our contracts are included as operating activities whereas changes in restricted cash for funds invested as collateral are included as investing activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows.

Property and Equipment

Depreciation expense was ~~$1.0~~$0.9 million and ~~$0.7~~$0.8 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, ~~and October 3, 2008, respectively.~~including certain depreciation amounts classified as Cost of services. Depreciation expense was ~~$2.0~~$2.9 million and ~~$1.5~~$2.3 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, ~~and October 3, 2008, respectively.~~respectively, including certain depreciation amounts classified as Cost of services. Accumulated depreciation was ~~$9.2~~$10.1 million and $8.6 million at ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009, respectively.

Accounting Policies

There have been no material changes to our other significant accounting policies not disclosed above.

Accounting Developments

Pronouncements Implemented

In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements”, which is an amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51. Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into the Accounting Standards Codifications (“ASC”) 810 —Consolidation. ASC 810 covers several areas including (i) defining the way the noncontrolling interests should be presented in the financial statements and notes, (ii) clarifying that all transactions between a parent and subsidiary are to be accounted for as equity transactions if the parent retains its controlling financial interest in the subsidiary and (iii) requiring that a parent recognize a gain or loss in net income when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. This statement is effective for the fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008. We adopted this statement in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, which changed our presentation of noncontrolling interests on our consolidated statements of income, consolidated balance sheets, consolidated statements of cash flows and consolidated statements of shareholders’ equity. We have applied the newly codified noncontrolling interest rules in ASC 810 retrospectively to the presentation of our balance sheets, statements of income, statements of cash flows and statements of equity.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). This statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into the ASC 805 —Business Combinations. This topic area retains the fundamental requirements in SFAS No. 141 that the acquisition method of accounting (which SFAS No. 141 called the purchase method) be used for all business combinations and for an acquirer to be identified for each business combination. ASC 805 defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of one or more businesses in the business combination and establishes the acquisition date as the date that the acquirer achieves control. Additionally, ASC 805 requires an acquirer to recognize the assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree at the acquisition date, measured at their fair values as of that date, with limited exceptions specified in the statement. Furthermore, ASC 805 also requires acquisition related costs to be expensed as incurred. ASC 805 was adopted in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.

In December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF 07-1, “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements”. Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into the ASC 808 —Collaborative Arrangements. ASC 808 provides guidance for determining if a collaborative arrangement exists and establishes procedures for reporting revenue and costs generated from transactions with third parties, as well as between the parties within the collaborative arrangement, and provides guidance for financial statement disclosures of collaborative arrangements. ASC 808 became effective for us in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. The adoption of ASC 808 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations. We have included additional disclosure on a collaborative arrangement in Note 12.

In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. 142-3, “Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets” (“FSP No. 142-3”). Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into both ASC 350 —Intangiblesas well as ASC 275 —Risks and Uncertainties. This guidance amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS No. 142”). The applicable portions of the ASC are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We ~~will apply~~have applied the newly codified rules for any applicable events and transactions in fiscal year 2010.

In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities.” Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into ASC — 260Earnings Per Share. The codification provides that unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The FSP is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. The adoption of the newly codified rules in ASC 260 did not have a material impact on basic or diluted earnings per share.

In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS 141(R)-1 “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination that Arise from Contingencies” (“FSP FAS 141(R)-1”). Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into ASC 805 —Business Combinations. This clarifies guidance pertaining to contingencies. The updated guidance states that an acquirer shall recognize at fair value, at the acquisition date, an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency if the acquisition-date fair value of that asset or liability can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition-date fair value of an asset acquired or a liability assumed in a business combination that arises from a contingency cannot be determined during the measurement period, an asset or a liability shall be recognized at the acquisition date if both of the following criteria are met which are (i) information available before the end of the measurement period indicates that it is probable that an asset existed or that a liability had been incurred at the acquisition date and (ii) the amount of the asset or liability can be reasonably estimated. We ~~will apply the newly~~adopted this recently codified guidance in ASC 805 ~~for any applicable events and transactions~~ in ~~fiscal year 2010.~~connection with our acquisition of Phoenix Consulting Group, Inc. (“Phoenix”), as further described in Note 15.

In May 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Standards No. 165 “Subsequent Events (as amended)” (“SFAS No. 165”), which provides guidance on management’s assessment of subsequent events. Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into the ASC — 855Subsequent Events. The new guidance clarifies that management must evaluate, as of each reporting period, events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date through the date that the financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Management must perform its assessment for both interim and annual financial reporting periods. ASC 855 requires management to disclose, in addition to the disclosures in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Auditing Standards (“AU”) 560, the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether that is the date on which the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. ASC 855 is effective prospectively for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. We have adopted this guidance through enhanced disclosures for any applicable events and transactions as further described in Note ~~15.~~16.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, “FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles” (“SFAS No. 168”). Certain portions of this statement were incorporated into ASC 105 —Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This standard is effective for financial statements for interim or annual reporting periods ending after September 15, 2009. ASC 105 replaced SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“SFAS No. 162”), and establishes only two levels of GAAP, authoritative and non-authoritative. The codification is the source of authoritative, nongovernmental GAAP, except for rules and interpretive releases of the SEC, which are sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. All other non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the codification ~~will become~~became non-authoritative. As the codification was not intended to change or alter existing GAAP, it did not have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Pronouncements Not Yet Implemented

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Standards No. 167, “Amendments to FASB Interpretation 46(R)” (“SFAS No. 167”). SFAS No. 167 ~~will be~~was converted to Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 17 (“ASU-17”) and has been incorporated into ASC 810 -—Consolidationonce effective. This statement amends the guidance for (i) determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”), (ii) the determination of the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity, (iii) requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity and (iv) changes the disclosure requirements in FIN 46(R)-8. This ~~Statement~~statement is effective as of our first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting periods thereafter. We are currently evaluating the ~~future~~potential impact of the adoption of this new guidance to ~~SFAS No. 167 on~~ our financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2009-013, “Revenue Recognition Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements” (“~~ASU-12”~~ASU-13”). This update (i) removes the objective-and-reliable-evidence-of-fair-value criterion from the separation criteria used to determine whether an arrangement involving multiple deliverables contains more than one unit of accounting, (ii) replaces references to “fair value” with “selling price” to distinguish from the fair value measurements required under theFair Value Measurements and Disclosuresguidance, (iii) provides a hierarchy that entities must use to estimate the selling price, (iv) eliminates the use of the residual method for allocation, and (v) expands the ongoing disclosure requirements. The amendments in this update will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 and early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating the effect that adoption of this update will have on the company’s consolidated financial position and results of operations.

Note 2—Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per share are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and the effect of all dilutive common stock equivalents during each period.

As discussed in Note 1, we adopted ASC 260 during fiscal year 2010. Under ASC 260, common stock equivalents that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities and, therefore, are included in the computation of basic earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. As of ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, we did not have any common stock equivalents that contained non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents.

As of the period ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, our only common stock equivalents were restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance stock units (“PSUs”). Our RSUs and PSUs may be dilutive and included in diluted earnings per share calculations or anti-dilutive and excluded ~~as they are liability awards per~~from such calculations. For the ~~guidance in ASC 718 —~~~~Compensation — Stock Compensation~~.periods ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, we had no anti-dilutive units. The following table reconciles the numerators and denominators used in the computations of basic and diluted earnings per share:


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	October 2,		October 3,		October 2,		October 3,		For the Three Months Ended				For the Nine Months Ended
(Amounts in thousands, except per share data)	2009		2008		2009		2008		January 1, 2010		January 2, 2009		January 1, 2010		January 2, 2009
Numerator
Net income attributable to DynCorp International Inc.	$	20,555	$	12,871	$	41,200	$	30,851	$	20,428	$	19,753	$	61,628	$	50,604
Denominator
Weighted average common shares — basic		56,268		57,000		56,263		57,000		56,275		57,000		56,267		57,000
Weighted average affect of dilutive securities:

Restricted and performance stock units		—		61		33		40		226		437		169		324

Weighted average common shares-diluted		56,268		57,061		56,296		57,040		56,501		57,437		56,436		57,324


Basic earnings per share	$	0.37	$	0.23	$	0.73	$	0.54	$	0.36	$	0.35	$	1.10	$	0.89
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.37	$	0.23	$	0.73	$	0.54	$	0.36	$	0.34	$	1.09	$	0.88

April 3, 2009
Weighted
Average
Useful Life Gross Accumulated
(Amounts in thousands, except years) (Years) Carrying Value Amortization Net

Finite-lived intangible assets:
Customer-related intangible assets 8.5 $ 290,716 $ (155,142 ) $ 135,574
Other 5.5 15,351 (8,206 ) 7,145

$ 306,067 $ (163,348 ) $ 142,719

Indefinite-lived intangible assets — Tradename $ 18,318 $ — $ 18,318


	April 3, 2009
	Weighted
	Average
	Useful Life		Gross Carrying		Accumulated
(Amounts in thousands, except years)	(Years)		Value		Amortization			Net
Other intangibles, net
Finite lived intangible assets:
Customer related intangible assets		8.5	$	290,716	$	(155,142	)	$	135,574
Other		5.5		15,351		(8,206	)		7,145

			$	306,067	$	(163,348	)	$	142,719

Tradename
Indefinite lived intangible assets — Tradename		—	$	18,318	$	—		$	18,318

Amortization expense for ~~customer-related~~customer related and other intangibles was $9.8 million and $9.5 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, and ~~October 3, 2008, and $19.0~~$28.8 million and ~~$19.6~~$29.1 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, ~~and October 3, 2008,~~ respectively.

The following schedule outlines an estimate of future amortization based upon the finite-lived intangible assets owned at ~~October 2, 2009:~~January 1, 2010:


	Amortization		Amortization
	Expense
	(Dollars in
	thousands)
Six month period ended October 2, 2010	$	18,995
(Amounts in thousands)			Expense
Three month period ending April 2, 2010			$	9,879
Estimate for fiscal year 2011		33,926		35,644
Estimate for fiscal year 2012		23,248		24,857
Estimate for fiscal year 2013		19,480		20,971
Estimate for fiscal year 2014		8,282		9,605
Thereafter		21,446		27,382

Total			$	128,338

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, we paid ~~$2.2~~$2.4 million and ~~$4.1~~$6.5 million in net settlements and incurred ~~$2.2~~$2.0 million of expenses, of which ~~$1.9 million~~ was recorded to interest expense, and ~~$0.3 million was recorded to other (loss)/income and~~ incurred ~~$4.3~~$6.3 million of expenses, of which ~~$3.8~~$5.8 million was recorded to interest expense and $0.5 million was recorded to other (loss)/income, respectively.

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008,~~January 2, 2009, we paid ~~$1.5~~$0.9 million and ~~$3.1~~$4.0 million in net settlements and incurred ~~$1.1~~$1.0 million of expenses, which was recorded to interest expense, and incurred ~~$3.0~~$4.0 million in expenses of which ~~$2.6~~$3.6 million was recorded to interest expense and $0.4 million was recorded to other (loss)/income, respectively.

Amounts are reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings as net cash settlements occur, changes from quarterly derivative valuations are updated, new circumstances dictate the disqualification of hedge accounting and adjustments for cumulative ineffectiveness are recorded.

The fair values of our derivative instruments and the line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheet to which they were recorded as of ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

Fair Value at Fair Value at
Derivatives designated as hedges under ASC 815 Balance Sheet Location October 2, 2009 April 3, 2009
Interest Rate Swaps Other accrued liabilities $ 5,221 $ 5,259
Interest Rate Swaps Other long-term liabilities — 957

Total $ 5,221 $ 6,216


		Fair Value at		Fair Value at
Derivatives designated as hedges under ASC 815	Balance Sheet Location	January 1, 2010		April 3, 2009
Interest rate swaps	Other accrued liabilities	$	3,341	$	5,259
Interest rate swaps	Other long-term liabilities		—		957

Total		$	3,341	$	6,216


		Fair Value at		Fair Value at			Fair Value at		Fair Value at
Derivatives not designated as hedges under ASC 815	Balance Sheet Location	October 2, 2009		April 3, 2009		Balance Sheet Location	January 1, 2010		April 3, 2009
Interest Rate Swaps	Other accrued liabilities	$	964	$	893
Interest Rate Swaps	Other long-term liabilities		—		182
Interest rate swaps						Other accrued liabilities	$	613	$	893
Interest rate swaps						Other long-term liabilities		—		182

	Total	$	964	$	1,075
Total							$	613	$	1,075


Total Derivatives		$	6,185	$	7,291		$	3,954	$	7,291

The effects of our derivative instruments on other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and our Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED

ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME

IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES

(EFFECTIVE PORTION)

(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)

Change in OCI from

Gains (Losses)

Recognized in OCI

GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED

on Derivatives

ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME

IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES

Derivatives Designated as

(Effective Portion)

Line Item

(Effective Portion)

(EFFECTIVE PORTION)

(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)

Cash Flow Hedging

Three Months ended

Line Item in Statements

in Statements

Three Months ended

Line Item in Statements

Instruments under ASC 815

October 2, 2009

of Income

Amount

of Income

Amount

January 1, 2010

of Income

Amount

of Income

Amount

Interest rate derivatives

320

Interest expense

(1,854

)

Other (loss)/income, net

—

1,902

Interest expense

(2,022

)

Other (loss)/income, net

—

Total

320

(1,854

)

—

1,902

(2,022

)

—

The effects of our derivative instruments on ~~other~~ OCI and our Consolidated Statements of Income for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED

ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME

IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES

(EFFECTIVE PORTION)

(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)

Change in OCI from

Gains (Losses)

Recognized in OCI

GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED

on Derivatives

ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME

IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES

Derivatives Designated as

(Effective Portion)

Line Item

(Effective Portion)

(EFFECTIVE PORTION)

(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)

Cash Flow Hedging

Six Months ended

Line Item in Statements

in Statements

Nine Months ended

Line Item in Statements

Instruments under ASC 815

October 2, 2009

of Income

Amount

of Income

Amount

January 1, 2010

of Income

Amount

of Income

Amount

Interest rate derivatives

1,206

Interest expense

(3,754

)

Other (loss)/income net

—

3,109

Interest expense

(5,776

)

Other (loss)/income net

—

Total

1,206

(3,754

)

—

3,109

(5,776

)

—

The effects of our derivative instruments on OCI and our Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended ~~October 3, 2008~~January 2, 2009 are summarized as follows (in thousands):


				GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM				GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED
				ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME				IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES
				(EFFECTIVE PORTION)				(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)
	Change in OCI from Gains											Change in OCI from
	(Losses)											Gains (Losses)
	Recognized in OCI											Recognized in OCI			GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM				GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED
	on Derivatives											on Derivatives			ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME				IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES
Derivatives Designated as	(Effective Portion)							Line Item				(Effective Portion)			(EFFECTIVE PORTION)				(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)
Cash Flow Hedging	Three Months ended			Line Item in Statements				in Statements				Three months ended			Line Item in Statements				Line Item in Statements
Instruments under ASC 815	October 3, 2008			of Income	Amount			of Incomes	Amount			January 2, 2009			of Income	Amount			of Incomes	Amount
Interest rate derivatives	$	(56	)	Interest expense	$	(918	)	Interest expense	$	(152	)	$	(2,892	)	Interest expense	$	(980	)	Interest expense	$	9


Total	$	(56	)		$	(918	)		$	(152	)	$	(2,892	)		$	(980	)		$	9

The effects of our derivative instruments on OCI and our Consolidated Statements of Income for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008~~January 2, 2009 are summarized as follows (in thousands):

GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED

ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME

IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES

(EFFECTIVE PORTION)

(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)

Change in OCI from

Gains (Losses)

Recognized in OCI

GAINS (LOSSES) RECLASSIFIED FROM

GAINS (LOSSES) RECOGNIZED

on Derivatives

ACCUMULATED OCI INTO INCOME

IN INCOME ON DERIVATIVES

Derivatives Designated as

(Effective Portion)

Line Item

(Effective Portion)

(EFFECTIVE PORTION)

(INEFFECTIVE PORTION)

Cash Flow Hedging

Six Months ended

Line Item in Statements

in Statements

Nine months ended

Line Item in Statements

Instruments under ASC 815

October 3, 2008

of Income

Amount

of Incomes

Amount

January 2, 2009

of Income

Amount

of Incomes

Amount

Interest rate derivatives

5,571

Interest expense

(2,784

)

Interest expense

158

2,679

Interest expense

(3,764

)

Interest expense

167

Total

5,571

(2,784

)

158

2,679

(3,764

)

167

General Legal Matters

We are involved in various lawsuits and claims that have arisen in the normal course of business. In most cases, we have denied, or believe we have a basis to deny any liability. Related to these matters, we have recorded a reserve of approximately ~~$21.3~~$21.1 million as of ~~October 2, 2009.~~January 1, 2010. While it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of litigation and other matters discussed below, we believe that liabilities in excess of those recorded, if any, arising from such matters would not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, consolidated financial condition or liquidity over the long-term.

~~We have~~As previously disclosed, we identified certain payments made on our behalf by two subcontractors to expedite the issuance of a limited number of visas and licenses from a foreign ~~government~~government’s agencies that may raise compliance issues under the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. The payments, which we believe totaled approximately $300,000 in the aggregate, were made to sub-contractors in connection with servicing a single existing task order that the Company has with a U.S. government agency. We ~~have~~ retained outside counsel to investigate these payments. ~~We are in the process of evaluating our internal policies and procedures and are committed to improving our compliance procedures. During the past week,~~In November 2009, we voluntarily brought these matters to the attention of the U.S. Department of Justice and the ~~Securities~~SEC. We are cooperating with the government’s review of these matters. We are also continuing our evaluation of our internal policies and ~~Exchange Commission.~~procedures. We cannot predict the ultimate consequences of these matters at this time, nor can we reasonably estimate the potential liability, if any, related to these matters. However, based on the facts currently known, we do not believe that these matters will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flow. We have not recorded any reserves with respect to ~~this matter.~~these matters.

Pending litigation and claims

On May 14, 2008, a jury in the Eastern District of Virginia found against us in a case brought by a former subcontractor, Worldwide Network Services (“WWNS”), on two Department of State (“DoS”) contracts, in which WWNS alleged racial discrimination, tortuous interference and certain other claims. The jury awarded WWNS approximately $15.7 million in compensatory and punitive damages and awarded us approximately $0.2 million on a counterclaim. In addition to the jury award, the court awarded WWNS approximately $3.0 million in connection with certain contract claims. On September 22, 2008, WWNS was awarded approximately $1.8 million in attorneys’ fees. On February 2, 2009, we filed an appeal with respect to this matter. On September 22, 2009, the Court of Appeals heard oral arguments. We are awaiting the courts determination. As of ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, we believe we have adequate reserves recorded for this matter.

On December 4, 2006, December 29, 2006, March 14, 2007 and April 24, 2007, four lawsuits were served, seeking unspecified monetary damages against DynCorp International LLC and several of its former affiliates in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, concerning the spraying of narcotic plant crops along the Colombian border adjacent to Ecuador. Three of the lawsuits, filed on behalf of the Provinces of Esmeraldas, Sucumbíos, and Carchi in Ecuador, allege violations of Ecuadorian law, international law, and statutory and common law tort violations, including negligence, trespass, and nuisance. The fourth lawsuit, filed on behalf of citizens of the Ecuadorian provinces of Esmeraldas and Sucumbíos, alleges personal injury, various counts of negligence, trespass, battery, assault, intentional infliction of emotional distress, violations of the Alien Tort Claims Act and various violations of international law. The four lawsuits were consolidated, and based on our motion granted by the court, the case was subsequently transferred to the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. On March 26, 2008, a First Amended Consolidated Complaint was filed that identified 3,266 individual plaintiffs. As of January 12, 2010, 1,256 of the plaintiffs have been dismissed by court orders. The amended complaint does not demand any specific monetary damages; however, a court decision against us, although we believe to be remote, could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. The aerial spraying operations were and continue to be managed by us under a DoS contract in cooperation with the Colombian government. The DoS contract provides indemnification to us against third-party liabilities arising out of the contract, subject to available funding. The DoS has reimbursed us for all legal expenses to date.

A lawsuit filed on September 11, 2001, and amended on March 24, 2008, seeking unspecified damages on behalf of twenty-six residents of the Sucumbíos Province in Ecuador, was brought against our operating company and several of its former affiliates in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The action alleges violations of the laws of nations and United States treaties, negligence, emotional distress, nuisance, battery, trespass, strict liability, and medical monitoring arising from the spraying of herbicides near the Ecuador-Colombia border in connection with the performance of the DoS, International Narcotics and Law Enforcement contract for the eradication of narcotic plant crops in Colombia. As of January 12, 2010, fifteen of the plaintiffs have been dismissed by court order. The terms of the DoS contract provide that the DoS will indemnify our operating company against third-party liabilities arising out of the contract, subject to available funding. The DoS has reimbursed us for all legal expenses to date. We are also entitled to indemnification by Computer Sciences Corporation in connection with this lawsuit, subject to certain limitations. Additionally, any damage award would have to be apportioned between the other defendants and our operating company. We believe that the likelihood of an unfavorable judgment in this matter is remote and that, even if that were to occur, the judgment is unlikely to result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition as a result of the third party indemnification and apportionment of damages described above.

Arising out of the litigation described in the preceding two paragraphs, on September 22, 2008, we filed a separate lawsuit against our aviation insurance carriers seeking defense and coverage of the referenced claims. On November 9, 2009, the court granted our Partial Motion for Summary Judgment regarding the duty to defend. The carriers filed a motion for reargument, which has been fully briefed and is pending judgment. In a related action, the carriers filed a lawsuit against us on February 5, 2009, seeking rescission of certain aviation insurance policies based on an alleged misrepresentation by us concerning the existence of certain of the lawsuits relating to the eradication of narcotic plant crops. Since we filed an answer to the complaint, there has not been any significant activity.

U.S. Government Investigations

We also are occasionally the subject of investigations by various agencies of the U.S. government. Such investigations, whether related to our U.S. government contracts or conducted for other reasons, could result in administrative, civil or criminal liabilities, including repayments, fines or penalties being imposed upon us, or could lead to suspension or debarment from future U.S. government contracting.

On January 30, 2007, the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction (“SIGIR”) issued a report on one of our task orders concerning the Iraqi Police Training Program. Among other items, the report raises questions about our work to establish a residential camp in Baghdad to house training personnel. Specifically, the SIGIR report recommends that the DoS seek reimbursement of $4.2 million paid by the DoS to us for work that the SIGIR maintains was not contractually authorized. In addition, the SIGIR report recommends that the DoS request the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) to review two of our invoices totaling $19.1 million. On June 28, 2007, we received a letter from the DoS contracting officer requesting our repayment of approximately $4.0 million for work performed under this task order, which the letter claims was unauthorized. We responded to the DoS contracting officer in letters dated July 7, 2007 and September 4, 2007, explaining that the work for which we were paid by DoS was appropriately performed and denying DoS’ request for repayment of approximately $4.0 million. By letter dated April 30, 2008, the DoS contracting officer responded to our July 7, 2007 and September 4, 2007 correspondence by taking exception to the explanation set forth in our letters and reasserting the DoS’ request for a refund of approximately $4.0 million. On May 8, 2008, we replied to the DoS letter dated April 30, 2008 and provided additional support for our position.

On September 17, 2008, the U.S. Department of State Office of Inspector General (“OIG”) served us with a records subpoena for the production of documents relating to our Civilian Police Program in Iraq. Among other items, the subpoena seeks documents relating to our business dealings with a former subcontractor, Corporate Bank. We have been cooperating with the OIG’s investigation. In October 2009, we were notified by the Department of Justice that this investigation is being done in connection with aqui tamlitigation brought by a private individual on behalf of the U.S. government. The subject matter of this litigation is still under seal; therefore, we cannot assess its effects on our operating performance.

U.S. Government Audits

Our contracts are regularly audited by the DCAA and other government agencies. These agencies review our contract performance, cost structure and compliance with applicable laws, regulations and standards. The DCAA also reviews the adequacy of, and our compliance with, our internal control systems and policies, including our purchasing, property, estimating, compensation and management information systems. Any costs found to be improperly allocated to a specific contract will not be reimbursed. In addition, government contract payments received by us for allowable direct and indirect costs are subject to adjustment after audit by government auditors and repayment to the government if the payments exceed allowable costs as defined in the government contracts.

The Defense Contract Management Agency (“DCMA”) formally notified us of non-compliance with Cost Accounting Standard 403, Allocation of Home Office Expenses to Segments, on April 11, 2007. We issued a response to the DCMA on April 26, 2007 with a proposed solution to resolve the area of non-compliance, which related to the allocation of corporate general and administrative costs between our divisions. On August 13, 2007, the DCMA notified us that additional information would be necessary to justify the proposed solution. We issued responses on September 17, 2007, April 28, 2008 and September 10, 2009 and the matter is pending resolution. Based on facts currently known, we do not believe the matters described in this and the preceding paragraph will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

We are currently under audit by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) for employment taxes covering the calendar years 2005 through 2007. In the course of the audit process, the IRS has questioned our treatment of exempting from U.S. employment taxes all U.S. residents working abroad for a foreign subsidiary. While we believe our treatment with respect to employment taxes, for these employees, was appropriate, a negative outcome on this matter could result in a potential liability, including penalties, of approximately $113.8 million related to these calendar years.

Contract Matters

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 we terminated for cause a contract to build the Akwa Ibom International Airport for the State of Akwa Ibom in Nigeria. Consequently, we terminated certain subcontracts and purchase orders the customer advised us it did not want to assume. Based on our experience with this particular Nigerian state government customer, we believe it is likely the customer will challenge our termination of the contract for cause and initiate legal action against us. Our termination of certain subcontracts not assumed by the customer, including our actions to recover against advance payment and performance guarantees established by the subcontractors for our benefit is being challenged in certain instances. Although we believe our right to terminate this contract and such subcontracts was justified and permissible under the terms of the contracts, and we intend to rigorously contest any claims brought against us arising out of such terminations, if courts were to conclude that we were not entitled to terminate one or more of the contracts and damages were assessed against us, such damages could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

Note 9—Equity-Based Compensation

As of ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, we have outstanding equity-based compensation through the grant of Class B interests in DIV Holding LLC, the largest holder of our common stock and have granted restricted stock units and performance stock units under our 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2007 Plan”). All of our equity-based compensation is accounted for under ASC 718 —–Compensation-Stock Compensation. Under this method, we recorded equity-based compensation expense of ~~$1.3~~$0.3 million and ~~$1.4~~$1.2 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, ~~and October 3, 2008,~~ respectively, and ~~$2.2~~$2.5 million and ~~$1.2~~$2.4 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, ~~and October 3, 2008,~~ respectively.

Class B Equity

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, we had no new grants but had ~~one~~ forfeiture ~~event~~events in both the first quarter and third quarter of fiscal year 2010. Consequently, the fiscal year to date ~~expenses~~expense recognized ~~were~~for Class B activity was the result of the quarterly amortization from the graded vesting schedule, partially offset by the impact of the forfeited class B interests.

A summary of Class B activity during the first ~~six~~nine months of fiscal year 2010 is as follows:


	% Interest in			Grant Date			% Interest in			Grant Date
	DIV Holding			Fair Value			DIV Holding			Fair Value
Balance April 3, 2009		4.71	%	$	9,669			4.71	%	$	9,669
First quarter fiscal year 2010 forfeitures		(0.03	%)		(37	)		(0.03	%)		(37	)

Balance July 3, 2009		4.68	%	$	9,632			4.68	%	$	9,632

Second quarter fiscal year 2010 forfeitures		0.0	%		—			—			—

Balance October 2, 2009		4.68	%	$	9,632			4.68	%	$	9,632

Third quarter fiscal year 2010 forfeitures								(0.10	%)		(318	)
Balance January 1, 2010								4.58	%	$	9,314


April 3, 2009 vested		3.69	%	$	6,950			3.69	%	$	6,950
First quarter fiscal year 2010 vesting		0.04	%		174			0.04	%		174

July 3, 2009 vested		3.73	%	$	7,124			3.73	%	$	7,124

Second quarter fiscal year 2010 vesting		0.05	%		73			0.05	%		73

October 2, 2009 vested		3.78	%	$	7,197			3.78	%	$	7,197

Third quarter fiscal year 2010 vesting								0.20	%		702
January 1, 2010 vested								3.98	%	$	7,899


April 3, 2009 nonvested		1.02	%	$	2,718			1.02	%	$	2,719
July 3, 2009 nonvested								0.95	%	$	2,508
October 2, 2009 nonvested		0.90	%	$	2,436			0.90	%	$	2,435
January 1, 2010 nonvested								0.60	%	$	1,415

~~During the six months ended October 2, 2009, 37,500 RSU vested awards held by our CEO were settled by issuing 21,675 treasury shares,~~Assuming each grant outstanding as of January 1, 2010, net of ~~payroll withholding, with a~~estimated forfeitures, fully vests, we will recognize the related equity-based compensation expense as follows based on the value of ~~$0.3 million.~~these liability awards based on our closing stock price on January 1, 2010 (in thousands):


Three month fiscal period ending April 2, 2010	$	996
Fiscal year ending April 1, 2011		3,672
Fiscal year ending March 30, 2012 and thereafter		3,855

Total	$	8,523

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, one of our consolidated joint ventures, DIFZ, in which we have a 50% ownership interest, established a 2009 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “DIFZ Plan”). Under the DIFZ Plan, the joint venture can issue equity based awards to its employees. Although these awards are only paid in cash, the value of these awards is tied to our common stock. As such, these awards qualify as equity-based compensation under ASC 718. As of the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, the liabilities and expenses associated with the DIFZ Plan were not material.

In accordance with ASC 718 and our policy, we recognize compensation expense related to the RSUs and PSUs on a graded schedule over the requisite service period, net of estimated forfeitures. Compensation expense related to RSUs and PSUs was approximately $1.1 million for the three months ended October 2, 2009, and approximately $1.8 million for the six months ended October 2, 2009. Additionally, all RSUs and PSUs have been determined to be liability awards; therefore, the fair value of the RSUs and PSUs are re-measured at each financial reporting date as long as they remain liability awards. The estimated fair value of the RSUs and PSUs outstanding as of October 2, 2009, was approximately $13.0 million excluding the impact of estimated future forfeitures based on the closing market price of our stock on the grant date and was approximately $13.6 million excluding the impact of estimated future forfeitures based on the closing market price of our stock on October 2, 2009.

~~A summary of the combined RSU and PSU activity during the six months of fiscal year 2010 is as follows:~~

Weighted
Outstanding Average
Restricted Grant Date
Stock Units Fair Value

Outstanding, April 3, 2009 345,895 $ 16.71
Units granted 510,350 $ 16.89
Units forfeited (48,170 ) $ 16.40
Units vested and settled⁽¹⁾
(37,500 ) $ 15.74

Outstanding, October 2, 2009 770,575 $ 16.90


⁽¹⁾		~~During the six months ended October 2, 2009, 23,375 RSU awards, with a value of $0.4 million, vested but were not settled as of October 2, 2009. We expect to settle these shares in fiscal year 2010.~~

Assuming each grant outstanding as of October 2, 2009, net of estimated forfeitures, fully vests, we will recognize the related equity-based compensation expense as follows based on the value of these liability awards based on our closing stock price on October 2, 2009 (in thousands):

Six month fiscal period ended April 2, 2010 $ 2,217
Fiscal year ended April 1, 2011 3,846
Fiscal year ended March 30, 2012 and thereafter 4,619

Total $ 10,682

Note 10—Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions

The following tables present financial information of certain consolidated balance sheet captions (dollars in thousands).

Prepaid expenses and other current assets —Prepaid expenses and other current assets were:


	October 2,		April 3,
	2009		2009		January 1, 2010		April 3, 2009
Prepaid expenses	$	53,608	$	61,570	$	49,936	$	61,570
Inventories		16,971		10,840		11,989		10,840
Assets available for sale						3,517		—
Work-in-process		30,184		33,885		25,783		33,885
Joint venture receivables		5,125		2,491		7,834		2,491
Other current assets		10,389		15,428		9,572		15,428

Total	$	116,277	$	124,214	$	108,631	$	124,214

Amounts due from our unconsolidated joint ventures totaled ~~$5.1~~$7.8 million and $2.5 million as of ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009, respectively. These receivables are a result of items purchased and services rendered by us on behalf of our unconsolidated joint ventures. We have assessed these receivables as having minimal collection risk based on our historic experience with these joint ventures and our inherent influence through our ownership interest. The change in these receivables from April 3, 2009 to ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 resulted in a use of operating cash for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 of approximately ~~$2.6~~$5.3 million. The related revenue associated with our unconsolidated joint ventures totaled ~~$1.3~~$0.3 million and ~~$2.6~~$2.9 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, respectively, and ~~$11.4~~$2.1 million and ~~$14.1~~$16.1 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~and October 3, 2008,~~January 2, 2009, respectively. Additionally, we earned ~~$1.1~~$1.3 million and ~~$2.0~~$3.9 million in equity method income ~~from the Babcock joint venture~~ in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, respectively, and $1.3 million and ~~$2.4~~$4.0 million in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008,~~January 2, 2009, respectively.

As a result of the sale of 50% of our ownership interest in DIFZ ~~sale,~~in fiscal year 2009, we currently hold three promissory notes from our joint venture partner which had an aggregate initial value of $9.7 million as a result of the sales price. The notes are included in Prepaid expenses and other current assets and in Other assets on our consolidated balance sheet for the short and long-term portions, respectively. As of ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, the loan balance outstanding was ~~$8.6~~$8.4 million, reflecting the initial value plus accrued interest, less payments against the promissory notes.

Variable Interest Entities

Our population of variable interest entities, associated primary beneficiary assessments, and our joint venture ownership percentages have not changed from the information disclosed in our fiscal year 2009 ~~annual report.~~Annual Report. Additionally, Veritas Capital, the majority owner of DIV Holding, continues to be the majority owner of McNeil Technologies, our GLS partner. In the aggregate, our maximum exposure to losses as a result of our investment in VIEs consists of our ~~$9.5~~$8.2 million investment in unconsolidated subsidiaries, $7.8 million in receivables from our joint ventures, working capital funding to GLS as well as contingent liabilities that were neither probable nor reasonably estimable as of ~~October 2, 2009.~~January 1, 2010. While the amount of funding we provide to GLS can vary significantly due to timing of payments to vendors and collections from its customer, the average balance over the prior 12 months was approximately $22.9 million.

GLS assets and liabilities were ~~$147.7~~$136.6 million and ~~$108.3~~$103.3 million at ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, respectively, as compared to ~~$152.0~~$150.5 million and $129.6 million at April 3, 2009, respectively. Additionally, GLS revenue was ~~$198.4~~$177.5 million and ~~$396.7~~$574.2 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, respectively, as compared to ~~$201.3~~$199.0 million and ~~$319.7~~$518.7 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008,~~January 2, 2009, respectively.

DIFZ assets and liabilities were ~~$43.2~~$60.0 million and ~~$40.4~~$56.9 million, respectively, as of ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, as compared to $38.0 million and $36.5 million at April 3, 2009, respectively. Additionally, DIFZ revenue was ~~$99.4~~$105.8 million and ~~$194.0~~$299.7 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010, respectively; as compared to $28.2 million and $96.5 million for the three and nine months ended January 2, 2009, respectively. DIFZ revenue and costs are eliminated in consolidation.

Note 12—Collaborative Arrangement

We participate in a collaborative arrangement with two of our partners on the Logistics Civil Augmentation Program (“LOGCAP IV”). The purpose of this arrangement is to share some of the risks and rewards associated with this contract. We receive working capital contributions to mitigate the risks associated with the timing of cash inflows and outflows. We also share in the profits.

We account for this collaborative arrangement under ASC 808 —Collaborative Arrangements. We record revenue gross as the prime contractor. The cash inflows, outflows, as well as expenses incurred impact cost of services in the period realized or incurred. ~~The expenses incurred~~We shared total profits of $1.9 million and $2.6 million from ~~our profit sharing~~this collaborative arrangement ~~were not material~~ for the three ~~or six~~and nine months ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010, respectively. We shared total losses of $1.5 million and $2.6 million from this collaborative for the three and nine months January 2, 2009, respectively.

In December 2009, we removed one of our collaborative partners (see “Management’s Discussion and ~~October 3, 2008.~~Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Notable Events for the nine months ended January 1, 2010), which increased our LOGCAP IV profit sharing percentage from 40% to 70%.

Note 13—Segment Information

As discussed in Note 3, we have a new organizational realignment which resulted in three new operating segments. The purpose of the realignment is to support our transition, as we become an integrated global enterprise, by more closely aligning our organization with our strategic markets and continuing to streamline our infrastructure to facilitate growth. We believe this new structure better reflects our market focus and better positions us to achieve our goal of becoming the leading global government services provider and a high-performing integrated global enterprise.

The three segments are as follows:

Global Stabilization and Development Solutions, or GSDS segment provides a diverse collection of outsourced services, primarily to government agencies worldwide. GSDS consists of the International Civilian Police Program (“CivPol”) SBA, the Security & Mentoring SBA, the LOGCAP IV SBA, the Operations SBA, the Infrastructure SBA and the ~~Infrastructure~~Intelligence and Training Solutions SBA.

Global Platform Support Solutions, or GPSS segment provides a wide range of technical, engineering, logistics and maintenance support services primarily to government agencies worldwide. Additionally, GPSS provides services including drug eradication and host nation pilot and crew training. GPSS consists of the Aviation Life Cycle Support SBA, the Domestic Aviation Operations and Support SBA, the Field Service Operations SBA, the International Aviation Operations & Support SBA, the International Narcotics and Law Enforcement (“INL Air Wing”) SBA and the Land Systems SBA.

Global Linguist Solutions, or GLS segment provides rapid recruitment, deployment and on-site management of in-theatre interpreters and translators to the U.S. military for a wide range of foreign languages. GLS consists of the linguist service line SBA.

2425

The following is a summary of the financial information of the reportable segments reconciled to the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. All prior periods presented have been recast to reflect the new segment reporting.


	Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended
	October 2, 2009		October 3, 2008			January 1, 2010		January 2, 2009
Revenue
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	336,521	$	263,985		$	426,587	$	265,240
Global Platform Support Solutions		284,512		315,241			310,698		329,832
Global Linguist Solutions		198,393		201,305			177,457		198,951
Other/Elimination		1,946		(1,380	)		228		(1,696	)

Total revenue	$	821,372	$	779,151		$	914,970	$	792,327


Operating Income
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	20,386	$	1,036		$	13,355	$	19,003
Global Platform Support Solutions		19,813		28,284			24,104		22,618
Global Linguist Solutions		12,352		17,313			11,931		9,962

Total operating income	$	52,551	$	46,633		$	49,390	$	51,583


Depreciation and amortization
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	4,952	$	4,777		$	5,712	$	4,905
Global Platform Support Solutions		5,129		5,013			4,651		4,957
Global Linguist Solutions		157		215			167		167

Total depreciation and amortization	$	10,238	$	10,005		$	10,530	$	10,029

Note 14—Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

ASC 820 —–Fair Value Measurements and Disclosuresestablishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include:

~~Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;~~

~~Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and~~

~~Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.~~

	•		Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

	•		Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets that are either directly or indirectly observable; and

	•		Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions.

As of ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, we held certain assets and liabilities that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. These included cash equivalents (including restricted cash) ~~and~~, interest rate ~~derivatives.~~derivatives and contingent earn-out consideration from our acquisition of Phoenix. Cash equivalents consist of petty cash, cash in-bank and short-term, highly liquid, income-producing investments with original maturities of 90 days or less. Our interest rate derivatives, as further described in Note 7, consist of interest rate swap contracts. The fair values of the interest rate swap contracts are determined based on inputs that are readily available in public markets or can be derived from information available in publicly quoted markets. Therefore, we have categorized these interest rate swap contracts as Level 2. We have consistently applied these valuation techniques in all periods presented. The contingent earn-out consideration, as discussed in Note 15, relates to the consideration to be paid to the selling shareholders of Phoenix. The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement was determined using the weighted fiscal year 2010 forecasts discounted based on our weighted average cost of capital. As the valuation is based on internal models with inputs that are not observable, we have categorized the contingent earn-out consideration as Level 3.

Our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of ASC 820 at ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, were as follows:

~~Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using~~


	Book value of
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using									Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	financial		Quoted Prices in									Quoted Prices in
	assets/(liabilities)		Active Markets		Significant Other		Significant			Book value of financial		Active Markets for		Significant Other		Significant
	as of October 2,		for Identical		Observable Inputs		Unobservable			assets/(liabilities) as of		Identical Assets		Observable Inputs		Unobservable Inputs
(amounts in thousands)	2009		Assets (Level 1)		(Level 2)		Inputs (Level 3)			January 1, 2010		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
*Assets*
Cash equivalents⁽¹⁾	$	148,074	$	148,074	$	—	$	—		$	91,572	$	91,572	$	—	$	—

Total assets measured at fair value	$	148,074	$	148,074	$	—	$	—		$	91,572	$	91,572	$	—	$	—

*Liabilities*
Contingent earn-out consideration										$	2,778	$	—	$	—	$	2,778
Interest rate derivatives	$	6,185	$	—	$	6,185	$	—		$	3,954	$	—	$	3,954	$	—

Total liabilities measured at fair value	$	6,185	$	—	$	6,185	$	—		$	6,732	$	—	$	3,954	$	2,778

Note 15—Acquisition

On October 18, 2009, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of Phoenix, a leading provider of intelligence training, consultative and augmentation services to a wide range of U.S. government organizations. This acquisition is consistent with our goal of accelerating growth, expanding service offerings and penetrating new segments. It extends our ability to deliver compelling services to the intelligence community and national security clients. The Company funded the purchase price with cash on hand.

Phoenix has been incorporated into the GSDS operating segment as its own strategic business area representing a new service offering for the Company. Revenue since the acquisition totaled $5.2 million through January 1, 2010. The associated operating income has been immaterial.

The purchase price is comprised of the following three elements:


	Purchase
(Amounts in thousands)	Elements
Cash paid for acquisition at closing	$	38,573
Final working capital adjustment paid during the third quarter of fiscal year 2010		1,094
Fair value of contingent earn-out consideration payable in fiscal year 2011		2,707

Total purchase price	$	42,374

The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination pursuant to ASC 805 —Business Combinations.In accordance with ASC 805, the purchase price has been allocated to assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair value at the acquisition date. The following table represents the allocation of the purchase price to the acquired assets and liabilities and resulting goodwill (in thousands):


	Reconciliation
(Amounts in thousands)	to Goodwill
Total purchase price	$	42,374

Cash acquired		(1,762	)
Receivables		(5,674	)
Other assets		(4,326	)
Identifiable intangible assets		(12,352	)
Earn-out consideration liability		3,379
Other liabilities assumed		6,537

Goodwill	$	28,176

Management determined the purchase price allocations for the acquisition based on estimates of the fair values of the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed. We utilized recognized valuation techniques, including the income approach and cost approach for intangible assets and the cost approach for tangible assets.

The carrying amount of receivables approximates fair value as the acquired receivables are short-term in nature and have high probability of collection. There were no significant receivables determined to be uncollectable as of the date of the acquisition. Given that Phoenix only served the U.S. government, we believe the impact of any uncollected receivables would be immaterial to our consolidated financial statements.

The purchase price includes $4.4 million held in escrow for indemnification liabilities (as defined by the stock purchase agreement) of the seller, $3.4 million of which (less any amounts applied to claims) is expected to be released in March 2011. The final $1.0 million will be released in September 2013 (less any amount applied to claims). The seller’s indemnification obligations are not capped at the amount of the escrow. In accordance with the indemnification obligations set forth in the purchase agreement, we recorded an indemnification asset of $2.5 million related to an uncertain income tax position and a payroll tax liability.

Acquired intangible assets of $12.4 million consisted of customer relationships, non-compete agreements, training materials, software, and trade name. The amortization period for these intangible assets ranges from two to ten years. We recorded $0.3 in amortization during the three months ended January 1, 2009 covering the period of October 19, 2009 through January 1, 2010. The major classes of intangible assets are as follows:


	Weighted Average
(Amounts in thousands)	Useful Life		Amount
Customer relationships		7.5	$	2,827
Training materials		10		6,886
Software		10		2,046
Non-compete agreements		2		212
Tradename		5		381

			$	12,352

The goodwill arising from the acquisition consists largely of expectations that Phoenix extends our ability to deliver compelling services to national security clients and the intelligence community, which is consistent with our goal of accelerating growth, expanding service offerings and penetrating new segments. In addition, the acquisition is expected to strengthen the Company as a leading provider of specialized mission-critical services to civilian and military government agencies worldwide. The goodwill recognized is not deductible for tax purposes.

We recognized $0.7 million of acquisition related costs that were expensed in the second quarter in fiscal year 2010 and are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in our consolidated statements of income for the nine months ended January 1, 2010.

The Phoenix stock purchase agreement provides for earn-out payments ranging from a minimum of zero to a maximum of $5.0 million contingent upon the achievement of certain revenue and earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization targets for the calendar year ending December 31, 2010. The fair value of the contingent consideration arrangement was determined to be $3.4 million using the weighted fiscal year 2010 forecasts discounted based on our weighted average cost of capital. Subsequent changes in the fair value of the contingent earn-out liability will be recorded in earnings.

In addition to the purchase price, we agreed with the seller to pay $7.5 million into an escrow account for retention bonuses for key Phoenix employees. The retention bonuses will be paid upon completion of the individual retention periods ranging from March 2011 to October 2012. Additionally, termination without cause, termination by reason of death or disability or resignation for good reason will result in an accelerated retention payment. Alternatively, if the employee resigns or is terminated for cause prior to completion of the retention period he/she forfeits either all or a portion of their retention bonus. One retention employee was terminated without cause in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 which triggered a $1.7 million payment and related expense. The remainder of the deferred compensation expense will be amortized from periods ranging from 17 to 36 months after the acquisition date, the requisite vesting periods. The remaining $5.8 million is expected to be paid in March 2011.

Note 16—Subsequent Events

We evaluated subsequent events that occurred after the period end date through ~~November 9, 2009.~~February 8, 2010. We concluded that no subsequent events have occurred that require recognition on our financial statements for the three months or the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009.~~January 1, 2010. However, we determined that the acquisition of ~~Phoenix Consulting Group,~~Casals & Associates, Inc. (“Casals”) on ~~October 19, 2009~~January 22, 2010 merited additional disclosure.

On January 22, 2010, we acquired 100% of the stock of Casals, a private company that helps to achieve U.S. foreign policy and international development priorities assisting in the development of stable and democratic governments, implementing anti-corruption initiatives and aiding the growth of democratic public and civil institutions.

2629

~~Business Combination~~

On October 19, 2009, we acquired 100% of Phoenix Consulting Group, Inc. (“Phoenix”), which was a privately held company based in Arlington, Virginia. Phoenix is a leading provider of intelligence training, consultative and augmentation services to a wide range of U.S. government organizations. The acquisition broadens our service offerings into the intelligence community which is consistent with our goal of accelerating growth, expanding service offerings and penetrating new segments.

The total purchase price for ~~Phoenix~~Casals consists of a base purchase price of approximately ~~$46.0~~$5.9 million ~~(including an adjustment thereto made at closing based on estimated net working capital at closing),~~plus or minus a post-closing net working capital ~~adjustment and a potential contingent payment ranging from zero to $5 million.~~adjustment. The base purchase price, which was paid at the closing, ~~and~~was funded with cash on hand.

Through the post-closing net working capital adjustment, we will either pay or receive proceeds based on the final determination of net working capital at closing to the extent that the amount thereof is greater or less than ~~the~~ estimated net working capital at closing.

The base purchase price and the contingent consideration exclude (i) up to $1.5 million of contingent consideration to retain certain key employees that may be payable through fiscal year 2011 and (ii) acquisition related costs of approximately $0.5 million, which ~~are~~will be included in selling, general and administrative expenses.

The acquisition will be accounted for as a business purchase pursuant to ASC 805 —Business Combinations.In accordance with ASC 805, the purchase price will be allocated to assets and liabilities based on their estimated fair value at the acquisition date. The fair value of the contingent consideration at the acquisition date will be included in the purchase price allocation.

The goodwill arising from the acquisition consists largely of expectations that the addition of ~~Phoenix~~Casals extends our ability to deliver compelling services to the ~~intelligence communities and national security clients.~~international development community. The goodwill recognized is expected to be deductible for income tax purposes.

~~Phoenix~~Casals will be incorporated into the GSDS operating segment. The assets, liabilities, and results of operations of Casals are not expected to be material to our consolidated financial position or results or ~~operations in fiscal year 2010.~~operations.


ITEM 2.		MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto, and other data contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report. The following discussion and analysis should also be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements, and notes thereto, and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009. References to “DynCorp International”, the “Company”, “we”, “our”, or “us” refer to DynCorp International Inc. and its subsidiaries unless otherwise stated or indicated by context.

COMPANY OVERVIEW

We are a leading provider of specialized mission-critical professional and support services for the U.S. military, non-military U.S. governmental agencies and foreign governments. Our specific global expertise is in law enforcement training and support, security services, services to the intelligence community, base and logistics operations, construction management, aviation services and operations, and linguist services. We also provide logistics support for all our services, including those services provided under the recently-awarded LOGCAP IV contract. We have provided essential services to numerous U.S. government departments and agencies since 1951. Our current customers include the U.S. Department of Defense (“DoD”), the DoS, foreign governments, commercial customers and certain other U.S. federal, state and local government departments and agencies.

Global Stabilization and Development Solutions

GSDS provides a diverse collection of outsourced services primarily to government agencies worldwide. ~~As of October 2, 2009~~ GSDS includes ~~three~~four service offerings as described below:

Security & Training— This service offering is comprised of the following SBAs:

~~CivPol—~~CivPol — This SBA provides international policing and police training, judicial support, immigration support and base operations.

Security & Mentoring — This SBA provides senior advisors and mentors to foreign governmental agencies. In addition, it provides security and personal protection for diplomats and governmental senior officials.

Contingency Support and Operations— This service offering is comprised of the following SBAs:

LOGCAP IV — This SBA supports U.S. military operations and maintenance support, including but not limited to: construction services, facilities management, electrical power, water, sewage and waste management, laundry operations, food services and transportation motor pool operations.

Contingency Support & Operations — This SBA provides peace-keeping logistics support, humanitarian relief, weapons removal and abatement, worldwide contingency planning and other rapid response services. In addition, it offers inventory procurement and tracking services, property control, data entry and mobile repair services. Furthermore, this SBA provides facility and equipment maintenance and control and custodial and administrative services.

As discussed in Note 16 of this Quarterly Report, on January 22, 2010 we acquired Casals & Associates, Inc. (“Casals”), which will be consolidated within GSDS. Casals will operate within the contingency support and operations service offering. Under this line of business, Casals will (i) implement anti-corruption initiatives, (ii) aid the growth of democratic public and civil institutions, and (iii) act as a platform to further expand our services to the development and rule of law community. Since Casals was acquired after the quarter end, it is not included in our results of operations below.

Infrastructure— This service offering is comprised of a single SBA:

Infrastructure — This SBA provides civil, electrical, environmental and mechanical engineering and construction management services.

~~As discussed in Note 15 to our Financial Statements, we closed on~~Intelligence Training and Solutions— This service offering is comprised of a single SBA:

Intelligence Training & Solutions — This new SBA was created as a result of the acquisition of Phoenix Consulting Group Inc., which will be consolidated within the GSDS business unit. It will operate as the fourth service offering — Intelligence Training and Solutions. Under this service offering, we will (i)to provide proprietary training courses, management consulting and augmentation services to the intelligence ~~community and (ii) expand~~community. In addition, this SBA expands our services to the intelligence community and national security clients.

Global Platform Support Solutions

GPSS provides a wide range of technical, engineering, logistics and maintenance support services primarily to government agencies worldwide. Additionally, GPSS provides services including drug eradication and host nation pilot and crew training. GPSS includes two service offerings as described below:

Aviation— Our Aviation service offering provides a host of services that primarily features either aircraft maintenance or aircraft operations. This includes the following SBAs:

Aviation Life Cycle Support — Provides worldwide support of U.S. Army, Air Force and Navy fixed wing assets. Aircraft are deployed throughout the U.S., Europe, Asia, South America and the Middle East. This includes flight line and depot level maintenance consisting of scheduled and unscheduled events. Specific functions include repair, overhaul and procurement of components, and procurement of consumable materials and transportation of materials to and from the operating sites. In addition, the team is responsible for obsolescence engineering, quality control, inventory management, avionics upgrades and recovery of downed aircraft.

Field Service Operations — Provides worldwide maintenance, modification, repair, and logistics support on aircraft, weapons systems, and related support equipment to the DoD and other U.S. government agencies. Contract Field Teams (“CFT”) is the most significant program in our Field Service Operations SBA. ~~Our Company and its predecessors~~We have provided CFT services for over 58 years. This program deploys highly mobile, quick-response field teams to customer locations to supplement a customer’s workforce.

International Aviation Operations and Support — Provides aircraft fleet maintenance and modification services, ground vehicle maintenance and modification services, pilot and maintenance training, logistics support, air traffic control services, air transportation, base and depot operations, program management and engineering services. These services are provided internationally.

INL Air Wing — Conducts foreign assistance programs to reduce the flow of international narcotics.

Land Systems— This service offering is comprised of a single SBA:

Land Systems — This SBA provides maintenance, operations, support, life extension, engineering, marine services and program management services primarily for ground vehicles and docked ships. This includes the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected Vehicles Logistics Support (“MRAP”) contract.

Global Linguist Solutions

Global Linguist Solutions— This consolidated joint venture between DynCorp International Inc. and McNeil Technologies provides rapid recruitment, deployment and on-site management of in-theatre interpreters and translators to the U.S. military for a wide range of foreign languages. Our GLS operating segment is comprised of a single linguist service offering/SBA.

CURRENT OPERATING CONDITIONS AND OUTLOOK

There have been no material changes to the Company’s industry outlook, economic conditions, or internal strategy from those disclosed in the Company’s Form ~~10-Q~~10-K for the fiscal ~~period~~year ended ~~July~~April 3, 2009.

Notable Events for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010

~~LOGCAP IV task order in southern Afghanistan with an estimated value of approximately $600 million was awarded in July 2009 and began ramp-up activities in September 2009.~~

In September 2009, we were awarded a contract by the U.S. Air Force to provide aircraft maintenance support at Sheppard Air Force Base. The value of the contract is $31.2 million for the base period, and a potential maximum value of $230 million over seven years, if all options are exercised.

We were awarded a Worldwide Personal Protective Services (“WPPS”) task order that was originally expected to ramp up in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, but due to changes in customer requirements was delayed. Our current expectation is that we will begin performance on this program by the fourth fiscal quarter of 2010.

During the second quarter, we made a decision to purchase helicopters in support of our new WPPS air services task order. Given availability of customer assets to support this program, we mutually agreed to a task order modification under which the customer will now supply its own helicopters. As a result, we plan to utilize all but three of the purchased helicopter assets on other programs, some of which may be structured cost-reimbursable instead of fixed priced. We plan to sell the three helicopters that we do not intend to use on other programs.

We continue to encounter cost overruns in our Afghanistan construction projects, within our infrastructure service offering, due to significant challenges including the deteriorating security situation in and issues with getting equipment through customs in Afghanistan. Fiscal year 2010 second quarter results included a loss on Afghanistan construction of $5.3 million. We expect that our firm fixed-price Afghanistan construction contracts will continue to operate at a loss or at margins approaching zero over the contract terms. Accordingly, we do not expect to bid any similar firm fixed-price contracts without revised terms and conditions.

On the GLS program, we completed negotiations with the customer to modify our largest task order to include a ceiling for recoverable cost of $752 million, resulting in a cumulative reduction to revenue of $3.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010. In connection with these negotiations, we received indications from our customer that the next option period from December 2009 to December 2010 will be exercised.

	•		~~We signed~~The LOGCAP IV task order in southern Afghanistan with an ~~acquisition agreement~~estimated value of approximately $600 million was awarded in July 2009 and ramp-up activities began in September 2009.

	•		In September 2009, we were awarded a contract by the U.S. Air Force to provide aircraft maintenance support at Sheppard Air Force Base. The value of the contract is $31.2 million for the base period, and ~~subsequently closed~~a potential maximum value of $230 million over seven years, if all options are exercised. Operations started ramping up in October 2009.

	•		We were awarded a WPPS task order that was originally expected to ramp-up in the ~~acquisition~~second quarter of fiscal year 2010, but due to changes in customer requirements was delayed. Most of the services are now being delivered under the INL Air Wing program, which commenced in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010.

	•		During the second quarter, we purchased helicopters in support of our new WPPS air services task order. Given the availability of customer assets to support this program, we mutually agreed to a task order modification under which the customer will now supply its own helicopters. As a result, we plan to utilize all but three of the purchased helicopter assets on another program. We have sold one and plan to sell the remaining two helicopters that we do not intend to use in other programs.

	•		During the nine months ended January 1, 2010, we continued to encounter cost overruns in our Afghanistan construction projects, within our infrastructure service offering, due to significant challenges including the deteriorating security environment and issues with getting equipment through customs in Afghanistan. The nine months ended January 1, 2010 results included a loss on Afghanistan construction of $10.0 million, including $0.8 million related to the third fiscal quarter. We expect that our firm fixed-price Afghanistan construction contracts will continue to operate at a loss or at margins approaching zero over the contract terms. Accordingly, we do not expect to bid on any similar firm fixed-price contracts without revised terms and conditions.

	•		On the GLS program, we completed negotiations with the customer to modify our largest task order to include a ceiling for recoverable cost of $752 million, resulting in a cumulative reduction to revenue of approximately $6.0 million during the nine months ended January 1, 2010. In connection with these negotiations, our customer exercised another option under the task order covering a period from December 2009 to June 2010.

	•		We purchased Phoenix Consulting Group, Inc. on October 19, 2009. See Note 15 —-~~Subsequent Events~~Acquisitionfor additional information concerning this acquisition.

	•		We have historically participated in a collaborative arrangement with two other partners on LOGCAP IV. In November 2009, a U.S. grand jury indicted one of our collaborative partners, Agility, on charges of fraud and conspiracy alleging that it overcharged the U.S. Army on $8.5 billion worth of contracts to provide food to soldiers in Iraq, Kuwait and Jordan. Although Agility is associated with our LOGCAP IV collaborative arrangement, these allegations were in no way related to the work performed under LOGCAP IV. Effective December 16, 2009 we removed Agility as a collaborative partner on the LOGCAP IV contract and terminated the work under existing task orders. We have transitioned Agility’s responsibilities on our current task orders with no adverse affect to us.

	•		On December 16, 2009, we filed a pre-award protest with the Government Accountability Office (“GAO”) concerning the planned procurement of training and mentoring of police and government personnel in Afghanistan by the DoD through task orders issued by the U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command Counter-Narcoterrorism Technology Program Office (“CNTPO”). Under a CNTPO contract vehicle, we would be unable to bid on future CivPol task orders in Afghanistan. As we are the incumbent contractor currently performing the work, we believe it is in the customer’s best interest to allow us to bid on such work. We expect to learn the result of our bid protest in March 2010.

CONTRACT TYPES

Our business is performed under fixed-price, time-and-materials or cost-reimbursement contracts. Each contract type is described below.

•

Fixed-Price Type Contracts:In a fixed-price contract, the price is not subject to adjustment based on costs incurred, which can favorably or adversely impact our profitability depending upon our execution in performing the contracted service. Fixed-price contracts received by us include firm fixed-price, fixed-price with economic adjustment, and fixed-price incentive.


	•		Time-and-Materials Type Contracts:A time-and-materials type contract provides for acquiring supplies or services on the basis of direct labor hours at fixed hourly/daily rates plus materials at cost.


	•		Cost-Reimbursement Type Contracts:Cost-reimbursement type contracts provide for payment of allowable incurred costs, to the extent prescribed in the contract, plus a fixed-fee, award-fee or incentive-fee. Award-fees or incentive-fees are generally based upon various objective and subjective criteria, such as aircraft mission capability rates and meeting cost targets.

Any of these three types of contracts discussed above may be executed under an indefinite order indefinite quantity (“IDIQ”) contract, which are often awarded to multiple contractors. An IDIQ contract does not represent a firm order for services. Our CivPol, Field Teams, and LOGCAP IV programs are three examples of IDIQ contracts.

BACKLOG

We track backlog in order to assess our current business development effectiveness and to assist us in forecasting our future business needs and financial performance. Our backlog consists of funded and unfunded amounts under contracts. Funded backlog is equal to the amounts actually appropriated by a customer for payment of goods and services less actual revenue recognized as of the measurement date under that appropriation. Unfunded backlog is the actual dollar value of unexercised, priced contract options, and the unfunded portion of exercised contract options. Most of our U.S. government contracts allow the customer the option to extend the period of performance of a contract for a period of one or more years. These priced options may or may not be exercised at the sole discretion of the customer. It has been our experience that the customer has typically exercised contract options.

Firm funding for our contracts is usually made for one year at a time, with the remainder of the contract period consisting of a series of one-year options. Option periods are subject to the availability of funding for contract performance. The U.S. government is legally prohibited from ordering work under a contract in the absence of funding. Our historical experience has been that the government has typically funded the option periods of our contracts.

The following table sets forth our backlog as of the dates indicated (dollars in millions):


	October 2, 2009		April 3, 2009		January 1, 2010		April 3, 2009

Funded Backlog	$	1,809	$	1,431	$	1,686	$	1,431
Unfunded Backlog		4,867		4,867		4,451		4,867

Total Backlog	$	6,676	$	6,298	$	6,137	$	6,298

Our estimated remaining contract value represents total backlog plus management’s estimate of future revenue under IDIQ contracts for task or delivery orders that have not been awarded. Future revenue represents management’s estimate of revenue that will be recognized from future task or delivery orders through the end of the term of such IDIQ contracts and is based on our experience under such IDIQ contracts and our estimates as to future performance. Although we believe our estimates are reasonable, there can be no assurance that our existing contracts will result in actual revenue in any particular period or at all. Our estimated remaining contract value could vary or even change significantly depending upon various factors including government policies, government budgets and appropriations, the accuracy of our estimates of work to be performed under time-and-material contracts and whether we successfully compete with any multiple bidders in IDIQ contracts. As of ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009, our estimated remaining contract value was ~~$9.0~~$9.9 billion and $8.4 billion, respectively, ~~primarily~~ due to an increase in our estimated IDIQ contract revenue partially offset by a decline in backlog.

Consolidated — Three and ~~Six Months~~Nine months Ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 Compared to Three and ~~Six Months~~Nine months Ended ~~October 3, 2008~~January 2, 2009.

The following tables set forth, for the periods indicated, our consolidated results of operations, both in dollars and as a percentage of revenue:


	Three Months Ended										Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	October 2, 2009					October 3, 2008					January 1, 2010					January 2, 2009

Revenue	$	821,372		100.0	%	$	779,151		100.0	%	$	914,970		100.0	%	$	792,327		100.00	%
Cost of services		(727,279	)	(88.5	%)		(696,519	)	(89.4	%)		(822,700	)	(89.9	%)		(704,210	)	(88.9	%)
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(31,304	)	(3.8	%)		(25,994	)	(3.3	%)		(32,350	)	(3.5	%)		(26,505	)	(3.3	%)
Depreciation and amortization expense		(10,238	)	(1.2	%)		(10,005	)	(1.3	%)		(10,530	)	(1.2	%)		(10,029	)	(1.3	%)

Operating income		52,551		6.4	%		46,633		6.0	%		49,390		5.4	%		51,583		6.5	%
Interest expense		(13,691	)	(1.7	%)		(14,905	)	(1.9	%)		(13,655	)	(1.5	%)		(15,322	)	(2.0	%)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(162	)	(0.0	%)		(4,443	)	(0.6	%)
Earnings from affiliates		1,527		0.2	%		1,523		0.2	%		1,278		0.2	%		1,319		0.2	%
Interest income		103		0.0	%		677		0.1	%		67		0.0	%		730		0.1	%
Other (loss)/income, net		(12	)	(0.0	%)		960		0.1	%
Other income (loss), net												285		0.0	%		(856	)	(0.1	%)

Income before taxes		40,316		4.9	%		30,445		3.9	%		37,365		4.1	%		37,454		4.7	%
Provision for income taxes		(13,301	)	(1.6	%)		(9,131	)	(1.2	%)		(10,493	)	(1.2	%)		(11,639	)	(1.4	%)

Net income		27,015		3.3	%		21,314		2.7	%		26,872		2.9	%		25,815		3.3	%
Noncontrolling interests		(6,460	)	(0.8	%)		(8,443	)	(1.1	%)		(6,444	)	(0.7	%)		(6,062	)	(0.8	%)

Net income attributable to DynCorp International Inc.	$	20,555		2.5	%	$	12,871		1.7	%	$	20,428		2.2	%	$	19,753		2.5	%

Revenue —Revenue for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 increased by ~~$42.2~~$122.6 million, or ~~5.4%~~15.5%, and ~~$110.6~~$233.2 million, or ~~7.4%~~10.2%, respectively, as compared with revenue for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. From a three month perspective, revenue increased primarily due to the ~~ramp up~~ramp-up of the ~~Southern Afghanistan~~ LOGCAP IV ~~task order,~~program, partially offset by decreases in our Field Teams and CivPol programs. From a ~~six~~nine month perspective, the increase was primarily driven by the ~~ramp up~~ramp-up of the LOGCAP IV program ~~in both Kuwait~~ and ~~Afghanistan, including the contract award fee. Also impacting the increase was~~ the benefit of a full ~~six~~nine months of revenue from the Intelligence and Security Command (“INSCOM”) contract, including award ~~fee,~~fees, as compared to the INSCOM ramp-up period which occurred during the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. Our acquisition of Phoenix also contributed to our revenue growth for both the three and nine months ended January 1, 2010.

Cost of services —Costs of services are comprised of direct labor, direct material, subcontractor costs, other direct costs and overhead. Other direct costs include travel, supplies and other miscellaneous costs. Costs of services for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 increased by ~~$30.7~~$118.5 million, or ~~4.4%~~16.8%, and ~~$91.4~~$210.0 million, or ~~6.9%~~10.3%, respectively, as compared with the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008 and was primarily a result of revenue growth.~~January 2, 2009. As a percentage of revenue, costs of services ~~decreased~~increased to ~~88.5% and 88.8% for the three and six months ended October 2, 2009, respectively, as compared with 89.4%~~89.9% and 89.2% for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008,~~January 1, 2010, respectively, as compared with 88.9% and 89.1% for the three and nine months ended January 2, 2009, respectively. This ~~decrease~~increase was primarily driven by lower margins on our Field Teams and CivPol programs, an increase in revenue from cost-reimbursable type contracts as compared to fixed-priced contracts and the impact of the fee sharing arrangement with our collaborative partners on the LOGCAP IV program. Partially offsetting this cost increase was effective cost management efforts on certain programs in ~~the~~our GPSS segment, higher award fees inon the ~~GLS segment which have~~INSCOM contract that had no corresponding costs, and lower losses associated with Afghanistan construction, partially offset by lower margins associated with our Field Teams contracts due to increased competition, and lower margin on our LOGCAP IV program as a result of the fee sharing arrangement with our partners.construction.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) —SG&A primarily relates to functions such as management, legal, financial accounting, contracts and administration, human resources, management information systems, purchasing and business development. SG&A expenses for the three and nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 increased by ~~$5.3~~$5.8 million, or 22.1%, and $6.7 million, or 8.4%, respectively, as compared to the three and nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expenses ~~increased to 3.8%~~were 3.5% for the three months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 as compared to 3.3% for the three months ended ~~October 3, 2008, contributed in part~~January 2, 2009. SG&A expenses for the period were impacted by ~~increased legal~~severance costs ~~costs associated with~~incurred during the ~~filing~~third quarter of ~~a Form S-3 registration statement,~~fiscal year 2010, costs associated with our acquisition strategy, and higher business development costs incurred in support of our ~~growth strategy. SG&A expenses for the six months ended October 2, 2009 increased by $0.9 million as compared to the six months ended October 3, 2008.~~growth. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expenses ~~decreased to 3.4%~~were 3.5% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, ~~as compared~~primarily due to ~~3.6% for the six months ended October 3, 2008. This difference as a percentage of revenue was primarily the result of~~factors resulting in higher SG&A expenses above offset by our former CEO’s severance package incurred in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009.

Depreciation and amortization —Depreciation and amortization for the three and nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 increased by ~~$0.2~~$0.5 million, or ~~2.3%.~~5.0%, and $0.3 million, or 1.0%, respectively, as compared to the three and nine months ended January 2, 2009. This increase was primarily due to incremental depreciation and amortization associated with our technology transformation initiative, which began ~~ramping up in~~to ramp-up during the second quarter of fiscal year 2010. This investment to modernize and upgrade our IT systems will enable more efficient and effective utilization of IT applications, provide better redundancy and reliability, integrate systems that were previously disconnected and support future growth. ~~From a six month perspective, depreciation and~~Also impacting the increase was the amortization ~~expense had a $0.2 million decline primarily attributed to calculating depreciation and amortization over 26 weeks for~~of the ~~six months ended October 2, 2009, as compared to 27 weeks for the six months ended October 3, 2008.~~intangible assets we acquired in our purchase of Phoenix.

Interest expense —Interest expense for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 decreased by ~~$1.2~~$1.7 million, or ~~8.1%~~10.9%, and ~~$0.8~~$2.5 million, or ~~2.8%~~5.6%, respectively, as compared with the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. The interest expense incurred relates to our credit facility, senior subordinated notes, and amortization of deferred financing fees. The decrease in interest expense was primarily due to a lower principal balance stemming from the excess cash flow principal payment on the credit facility and repurchases of senior subordinated notes that occurred in fiscal year 2010. Also impacting the decrease was one less week of interest expense during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 as compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009.

Income tax expense— Our effective tax rate ~~increased~~decreased to ~~33.0%~~28% and ~~32.7%~~31.2% for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, respectively, as compared with ~~30.0%~~31.1% and ~~31.6%~~31.4% for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008,~~January 2, 2009, respectively. Our effective tax rate was impacted by our reduced full year outlook and the tax treatment of our GLS and DIFZ joint ventures, which are not consolidated for tax purposes but are instead taxed as partnerships under the Internal Revenue Code.

Results by Segment — Three Months Ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~October 3, 2008~~January 2, 2009

The following tables set forth the revenue and operating income for our GSDS, GPSS and GLS operating segments, both in dollars and as a percentage of our consolidated revenue and segment operating margin, for the three months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 as compared to the three months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009.


	For the Three Months Ended									For the Three Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	October 2, 2009				October 3, 2008					January 1, 2010				January 2, 2009
Revenue
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	336,521	41.0	%	$	263,985		33.9	%	$	426,587	46.6	%	$	265,240		33.5	%
Global Platform Support Solutions		284,512	34.6	%		315,241		40.5	%		310,698	34.0	%		329,832		41.6	%
Global Linguist Solutions		198,393	24.2	%		201,305		25.8	%		177,457	19.4	%		198,951		25.1	%
Other/elimination		1,946	0.2	%		(1,380	)	(0.2	%)		228	(0.0	%)		(1,696	)	(0.2	%)


Consolidated	$	821,372	100.0	%	$	779,151		100.0	%	$	914,970	100.0	%	$	792,327		100.0	%


Operating Income
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	20,386	6.1	%	$	1,036		0.4	%	$	13.355	3.1	%	$	19,003		7.2	%
Global Platform Support Solutions		19,813	7.0	%		28,284		9.0	%		24,104	7.8	%		22,618		6.9	%
Global Linguist Solutions		12,352	6.2	%		17,313		8.6	%		11,931	6.7	%		9,962		5.0	%


Consolidated	$	52,551	6.4	%	$	46,633		6.0	%	$	49,390	5.4	%	$	51,583		6.5	%

Global Stabilization and Development Solutions

Revenue —Revenue of ~~$336.5~~$426.6 million for the three months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 increased ~~$72.5~~$161.4 million, or ~~27.5%~~60.8%, as compared with the three months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of the following:

Security & Training: Revenue of ~~$183.4~~$179.2 million increased ~~$4.3~~$3.2 million, or ~~2.4%~~1.8%, primarily as a result of a scope increase in our WPPS security services task order in Iraq and a new WPPS security services task order in Pakistan. Also contributing to the increase was our new Multinational Security Transition Command-Iraq (“MNSTC-I”) program which launched after ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009 and scope increases on our CivPol program in Afghanistan. Partially offsetting the revenue generated by these programs was the ~~impact of a~~ decline in our ~~Civilian Police~~revenue earned under CivPol program ~~as a result of reductions~~ in ~~equipment purchases.~~Iraq. We expect ~~CivPol revenue~~this downward trend in Iraq to ~~increase during~~continue into the ~~remainder of fiscal year 2010 due to scope increases in Afghanistan.~~fourth quarter. In terms of the training mission going forward in Afghanistan, ~~we believe that operational oversight will transition to~~ the DoD inwill oversee the ~~not too distant future. The~~operations and is attempting to transition the contract vehicle for the police training ~~mission may also transfer~~from a DoS contract to a DoD ~~vehicle.~~contract, under which we are not a contract party. We have filed a pre-award protest with the GAO concerning the transition and related planned procurement of training and mentoring of police and government personnel in Afghanistan in order to allow us to continue bidding on this work post-transition. While the time table for a potential contract transition is not clear, we believe that our current task order, which ~~currently ends in February~~has been extended to July 2010, ~~can~~may be ~~extended.~~extended, pending the outcome of the protest. If ~~the contract~~our bid protest is ~~renewed, we believe that~~granted, we will ~~retain either all or a large portion of~~be able to compete to provide the services under ~~this contract;~~the new contract vehicle; however, ~~any material changes~~if our bid protest is unsuccessful, we will be unable to service the DoD contract ~~including, but not limited~~in fiscal year 2011, which is likely to ~~the governmental agency that administers the contract, the amount of government funding or the overall scope of services under the renewed program could~~ adversely affect our operating performance.

Contingency Support and Operations: Revenue of ~~$126.6~~$226.3 million increased ~~$65.5~~$161.1 million or ~~107.2%~~246.8%, primarily due to increases ~~from both the Kuwait and Afghanistan task orders~~ on our LOGCAP IV program. We expect future growth in this service offering to be primarily driven by the recently awarded Afghanistan South task order on our LOGCAP IV program that carries an annual revenue potential of approximately $600 million. Although we have started work on this program, due to the timing of the award and transition period, we do not expect to achieve, in fiscal year 2010, the full fiscal year revenue implied by the annual revenue potential of this program.

Infrastructure: Revenue of ~~$26.6~~$15.9 million ~~increased~~decreased by ~~$2.8~~$8.1 million, or ~~11.6%~~33.8%, primarily due to ~~increases from two separate~~the impact of our Afghanistan construction ~~projects that commenced after the beginning of fiscal year 2009.~~projects. We do not expect to bid on any similar fixed-price contracts in Afghanistan without revised terms and conditions. This may impact future revenue in this segment by limiting the construction opportunities available to us.

Intelligence Training and Solutions: Revenue of $5.2 million for the three months ended January 1, 2010 represents a partial quarter since the acquisition of Phoenix closed on October 19, 2009. We anticipate future increases in revenue as we look to leverage our investment in this new SBA through the pursuit of new contracts.

Operating Income —Operating income of ~~$20.4~~$13.4 million for the three months ended ~~October 2, 2009 increased $19.4~~January 1, 2010 decreased $5.6 million as compared with the three months ended ~~October 3, 2008. Prior period results were negatively affected by large losses~~January 2, 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a decline in operating income on our ~~Afghanistan construction programs.~~CivPol program resulting from scope reductions in Iraq which we expect to continue into the fourth quarter, and the shift from fixed price task orders to cost plus task orders in both Iraq and Afghanistan. Also contributing to the ~~increase~~decline was ~~an expansion in services on both~~the impact of acquisition related retention bonus, contingent compensation and intangible amortization expenses associated with our ~~WPPS programs in Iraq and Pakistan and our MNSTC-I program, and non-recurring revenue~~acquisition of ~~$5.8 million on our WPPS program.~~Phoenix. Partially offsetting ~~this increase~~the decline was ~~a decline in margins on CivPol resulting~~operating income stemming from the ~~final close out~~continued ramp-up of ~~several firm fixed price task orders in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. For the remainder of fiscal year 2010,~~LOGCAP IV operations. Going forward, we expect ~~an increase~~LOGCAP IV to become more profitable as a result of the change in ~~CivPol operating income due to scope increases~~our collaborative partners, as discussed in ~~Afghanistan.~~Note 12 of this Quarterly Report.

Global Platform Support Solutions

Revenue —Revenue of ~~$284.5~~$310.7 million for the three months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 decreased ~~$30.7~~$19.1 million, or ~~9.7%~~5.8%, as compared with the three months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. The decrease primarily resulted from the following:

Aviation: Revenue of ~~$249.5~~$274.6 million decreased ~~$24.8~~$15.3 million, or 9%5.3%, for the three months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, as compared to the three months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. The decrease was primarily driven by declines in ~~the~~our Field Service Operations (“FSO”) ~~business area~~programs of ~~$27.9~~$30.9 million. FSO revenue declined due to the completion of several CFT task orders, for which we did not win the re-competes due to additional competitors in this service ~~space.~~space bidding what we believe to be at zero margin or negative margin levels. While ~~the additional competition puts~~this current competitive environment has put downward pressure on fiscal year 2010 revenue, we do not believe ~~this~~the current situation is sustainable and will not limit our long-term opportunities under the CFT program. These declines were partially offset by ~~additional~~an increase in services ~~including a new task order as a subcontractor to provide aircraft maintenance to support~~on our INL Air Wing program in Afghanistan, the ~~Afghanistan air force through our Counter Narcotics Technical Program Office (“CNTPO”) program.~~ramp-up of the Sheppard Air Force base program and the WPPS aviation services contract. We also expect continued growth driven by ~~a recent~~our WPPS task order win to provide aircraft maintenance and air transportation services that is expected to ~~ramp up by~~ramp-up during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010. ~~This program was originally slated to ramp-up in the current quarter but was delayed due to a change in customer requirements.~~

Land Systems: Revenue of ~~$35.0~~$36.1 million decreased ~~$5.9~~$3.8 million, or ~~14.4%~~9.6%, for the three months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, as compared to the three months ended ~~October 3, 2008,~~January 2, 2009, primarily due to ~~a decrease in our General Maintenance Corps~~the wind-down of the Army Prepositioned Stocks (“~~GMC”~~APS-3”) program ~~partially offset by~~which has transitioned to a competitor as well as a reduction in services on the GMC program. Partially offsetting was the impact of MRAP revenue of $26.4 million which was up $3.2 million as compared to the three months ended January 2, 2009 due to an increase in ~~services associated with our MRAP program.~~services.

Operating Income —Operating income of ~~$19.8~~$24.1 million for the three months ended ~~October 2, 2009 decreased~~January 1, 2010 increased by ~~$8.5~~$1.5 million, or ~~30.0%~~6.7%, as compared with the three months ended ~~October 3, 2008. The decrease~~January 2, 2009. This was primarily ~~driven by lower gross profit of $5.6 million on our FSO programs resulting from completion of task orders and $3.4 million on our GMC program resulting from adjustments~~attributable to ~~the estimated contract value on the GMC program. SG&A costs increased primarily due to an increase in bid and proposal activity. Partially offsetting this was~~ better cost management in several key aviation programs such as our LCCS & INL Air Wing programs as well as ~~improved margins~~increased revenue on the high margin MRAP program. Partially offsetting this increase was lower gross profit of $4.6 million on our ~~INL Air Wing Program driven by effective cost management~~FSO programs resulting from increased competition and ~~favorable foreign currency rates.~~completion of task orders. Although we expect our MRAP program to continue to ~~be profitable~~have strong margins in fiscal year 2011, we expect lower gross profit on our MRAP program starting in fiscal year 2011 reflecting an adjusted rate structure on the next option period.

Global Linguist Solutions

Revenue —Revenue of ~~$198.4~~$177.5 million decreased ~~$2.9~~$21.5 million, or ~~1.4%~~10.8%, for the three months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, as compared to the three months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. The decrease is primarily attributable to a reduction in the number of linguists supporting troops in Iraq, a result of the troop draw-down in that country. This ~~quarter-over-quarter decrease~~decline was ~~primarily due~~offset by improved award fee performance as compared to the ~~timing of the award fee accrual~~comparable period in fiscal year 2009. We expect revenue to decline in the ~~second~~fourth quarter of fiscal year ~~2009, which represented the initial recognition of the award fee from the contract’s inception. Additionally, we completed negotiations with the customer~~2010, due to ~~modify our largest task order to include a ceiling for recoverable cost of $752 million, resulting~~further reductions in a cumulative reduction to revenue of $3.4 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2010. In connection with these negotiations, we received indications from our customer that the next option period from December 2009 to December 2010 will be exercised. During the quarter we also received better than expected award fee determinations from our customer which resulted in additional revenue in the period.linguist counts.

Operating Income —Operating income of ~~$12.4~~$11.9 million ~~decreased $5.0~~increased $2.0 million for the three months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, as compared to the three months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. This ~~decrease~~increase was primarily attributable to higher comparative award fees primarily due to performance on the ~~timing of the award fee accrual in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, which represented the initial recognition of the award fee from the contract’s inception.~~contract, offset by lower overall revenue. Operating income earned by GLS benefits net income attributable to DynCorp International Inc. by our 51% ownership of the joint venture.

Results by Segment — ~~Six Months~~Nine months Ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 as Compared to the ~~Six Months~~Nine months Ended ~~October 3, 2008~~January 2, 2009

The following tables set forth the revenue and operating income for our GSDS, GPSS and GLS operating segments, both in dollars and as a percentage of our consolidated revenue and segment operating margin, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 as compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009.


	For the Six Months Ended									For the Nine months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	October 2, 2009				October 3, 2008					January 1, 2010				January 2, 2009
Revenue
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	620,606	38.6	%	$	533,539		35.7	%	$	1,047,193	41.5	%	$	798,779		34.9	%
Global Platform Support Solutions		588,160	36.6	%		644,978		43.1	%		898,859	35.6	%		974,810		42.6	%
Global Linguist Solutions		396,748	24.7	%		319,727		21.4	%		574,205	22.8	%		518,678		22.7	%
Other/elimination		1,035	0.1	%		(2,299	)	(0.2	%)		1,262	0.1	%		(3,995	)	(0.2	%)


Consolidated	$	1,606,549	100.0	%	$	1,495,945		100.0	%	$	2,521,519	100.0	%	$	2,288,272		100.0	%


Operating Income
Global Stabilization and Development Solutions	$	36,278	5.9	%	$	24,006		4.5	%	$	49,633	4.7	%	$	43,009		5.4	%
Global Platform Support Solutions		45,710	7.8	%		44,027		6.8	%		69,814	7.8	%		66,645		6.8	%
Global Linguist Solutions		23,064	5.8	%		18,549		5.8	%		34,995	6.1	%		28,556		5.5	%


Consolidated	$	105,052	6.5	%	$	86,627		5.8	%	$	154,442	6.1	%	$	138,210		6.0	%

Global Stabilization and Development Solutions

Revenue —Revenue of ~~$620.6~~$1,047.2 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 increased ~~$87.1~~$248.4 million, or ~~16.3%~~31.1%, as compared with the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. The increase was primarily the result of the following:

Security & Training: Revenue of ~~$373.7~~$552.8 million increased ~~$18.3~~$21.5 million, or ~~5.2%~~4.0%, primarily as a result of a scope increase in our WPPS security services task order in Iraq and a new WPPS security services task order in Pakistan. Also contributing to the increase was our new MNSTC-I program which launched after ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. Partially offsetting this increase was a decline in our CivPol program as a result of reductions in equipment purchases. ~~However, we expect increases in CivPol revenue during the rest of fiscal year 2010 due to scope increases in Afghanistan.~~ In terms of the training mission going forward in Afghanistan, we believe that operational oversight ~~will~~may transition to the DoD to a contract under which we are not a contract party. See our discussion above in the ~~not too distant future. The contract vehicle~~three months ended January 1, 2010 for the police training mission may also transfer to a DoD vehicle. While the time table for a potential contract transition is not clear, we believe that our current task order, which currently ends in February 2010, can be extended. If the contract is renewed, we believe that we will retain either all or a large portion of the services underfurther details regarding this contract; however, any material changes to the contract, including, but not limited to, the governmental agency that administers the contract, the amount of government funding or the overall scope of services under the renewed program could adversely affect our operating performance.transition.

Contingency Support and Operations: Revenue of ~~$201.4~~$427.8 million increased ~~$92.2~~$253.3 million or ~~84.4%~~145.1%, primarily due to increases from the Kuwait task orders and ramp-up of our southern Afghanistan task orders on our LOGCAP IV program. We expect future growth in this service offering to be primarily driven by the recently awarded Afghanistan task order on our LOGCAP IV program that carries an annual revenue potential of approximately $600 million. Although we have started work on this program, due to the timing of the award and transition period, we do not expect to achieve in fiscal year 2010 the full fiscal year revenue implied by the annual revenue potential of this program.

Infrastructure: Revenue of ~~$45.5~~$61.4 million decreased by ~~$23.4~~$31.6 million, or ~~34.0%~~33.9%, primarily due to the wind-down of a large construction project in Afghanistan combined with the termination of an airport construction contract in Africa, which occurred in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009. These declines were offset in part by increases from two separate Afghanistan construction projects that commenced after the beginning of fiscal year 2009. We do not expect to bid on any similar fixed-price contracts in Afghanistan without revised terms and conditions. This may impact future revenue in this segment by limiting the construction opportunities available to us.

Operating Income —Operating income of ~~$36.3~~$49.6 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 increased ~~$12.3~~$6.6 million, or ~~51.4%~~15.4%, as compared with the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. Prior period results were negatively affected by large losses on our Afghanistan construction programs. Also contributing to the increase was an expansion in services on both our WPPS programs in Iraq and Pakistan and our MNSTC-I program, and non-recurring revenue of $5.8 million on our WPPS program. Partially offsetting this increase was lower profitability in our CivPol program as a result of the final close out of several firm fixed price task orders in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009. ~~For the remainder of fiscal year 2010, we expect an increase in CivPol operating income due to scope increases in Afghanistan.~~

Global Platform Support Solutions

Revenue —Revenue of ~~$588.2~~$898.9 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 decreased ~~$56.8~~$76.0 million, or ~~8.8%~~7.8%, as compared with the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. The decrease primarily resulted from the following:

Aviation: Revenue of ~~$514.8~~$789.5 million decreased ~~$59.7~~$75.0 million, or ~~10.4%~~8.7%, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, as compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. The decrease was primarily driven by declines in FSO programs of ~~$44.6~~$75.5 million and the ~~INL~~International Narcotics and Law Enforcement (“INL”) Air Wing program of ~~$37.8~~$27.4 million. FSO revenue declined due to the completion of several CFT task orders, for which we did not win the re-competes due to additional competitors in this service space. While this is putting downward pressure on fiscal year 2010 revenue, we do not believe this will limit our long-term opportunities under the CFT program. The revenue decline in INL Air Wing revenue was driven by non-recurring equipment sales and construction work in both Camp Alvarado and Camp Valdes in Afghanistan performed in fiscal year 2009. These declines were partially offset by additional services including a new task order as a subcontractor to provide aircraft maintenance to support the Afghanistan air force through our CNTPO program. We also expect continued growth driven by a recent WPPS task order win to provide aircraft maintenance and air transportation services that is expected to ~~ramp up~~ramp-up by the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010.

Land Systems: Revenue of ~~$73.4~~$109.4 million ~~increased $2.9~~decreased $1.0 million, or ~~4.1%~~0.9%, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, as compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008,~~January 2, 2009, primarily due to scope decreases on our GMC program, the wind-down of the APS-3 program, and non-recurring threat systems management work. Partially offsetting this was increased services associated with the MRAP contract, which generated ~~$49.8~~$76.1 million of revenue for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 as compared to ~~$35.3~~$58.6 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008. This was partially offset by a decrease in our GMC program.~~January 2, 2009.

Operating Income —Operating income of ~~$45.7~~$69.8 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 increased ~~$1.6~~$3.2 million, or ~~3.8%~~4.8%, as compared with the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. The increase was primarily driven by better cost management in several key aviation programs ~~improved cost management and favorable foreign currency rates in the~~including our Life Cycle Contractor Support & INL Air Wing ~~program, and~~programs as well as increased services under our MRAP program. This was partially offset due to lower gross profit on our FSO programs due to the loss of several CFT task orders and lower margins on some existing CFT task orders, which was a result of additional competitors in this service space. Also negatively impacting operating income was adjustments to the estimated contract value on the GMC program. Although we expect our MRAP program to continue to be profitable in fiscal year 2011, we expect lower gross profit on our MRAP program starting in fiscal year 2011, reflecting an adjusted rate structure on the next option period.

Global Linguist Solutions

Revenue of ~~$396.7~~$574.2 million increased ~~$77.0~~$55.5 million, or ~~24.1%~~10.7%, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, as compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. GLS revenue benefited from higher award fees as a result of improved performance, a higher ~~fill rates~~number of linguists as compared to the first ~~six~~nine months of fiscal year 2009 and a full ~~six~~nine months of performance during the ~~first half~~nine months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009 in which GLS was transitioning the contract from the prior provider.

Operating income of ~~$23.1~~$35.0 million increased ~~$4.5~~$6.4 million, or ~~24.2%~~22.5% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, as compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. This increase was primarily due to a full ~~six~~nine months of performance during the first ~~half~~nine months of fiscal year 2010 as compared to fiscal year 2009 in which GLS was transitioning the contract from the prior provider. The increase was also supported by higher award fees earned during the period, partially offset by the impact of the modification on the INSCOM contract. Operating income earned by GLS benefits net income attributable to DynCorp International Inc. by our 51% ownership of the joint venture.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash generated by operations and borrowings available under our credit facility are our primary sources of short-term liquidity. Based on our current level of operations, we believe our cash flow from operations and our available borrowings under our credit facility will be adequate to meet our liquidity needs for the foreseeable future. However, we cannot be assured that our business will generate sufficient cash flow from operations, or that future borrowings will be available to us under our credit facility in an amount sufficient to enable us to repay our indebtedness, including the senior subordinated notes, or to fund our other liquidity needs.

In the ~~second quarter~~first nine months of fiscal year 2010, we ~~capitalized~~purchased approximately ~~$42.6~~$43.1 million in helicopter assets of which ~~approximately $39.7~~$2.8 million ~~was paid in cash. Of these helicopter assets, $6.3~~have been sold or impaired and $3.5 million were classified as available for sale and included in ~~the~~ inventory. The remainder were classified as fixed assets and included in Property and equipment, net. These helicopter assets were originally purchased in support of a new program in our GPSS operating segment. Given availability of customer assets to support this program, we mutually agreed to a task order modification under which the customer will now supply its own helicopters. As a result, we plan to utilize the purchased helicopter assets on ~~other programs, some of which may be structured as cost-reimbursable instead of fixed priced.~~another program.

We expect ~~significant cash requirements from~~the following three areas of our business to require significant cash outlays during the remainder of fiscal year 2010: (i) the expansion of the LOGCAP IV ~~contract~~contract; (ii) the potential for one or more acquisitions and (iii) noncontrolling interest payments to our joint venture partners. Our ~~recent~~ win of ~~a new~~the LOGCAP IV task order in southern Afghanistan and the potential to win additional sizeable task orders later this fiscal year will produce demands for liquidity to fund growth on this program. We expect cash contributions from our LOGCAP IV collaborative ~~partners~~partner and timely cash collections on the project to support the liquidity needed on this program. In December 2009, we removed one of our collaborative partners reducing the potential contributions to fund the program but increasing our share of profits and retention of cash generated on the program.

WeDuring the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, we paid approximately ~~$46~~$47.1 million ~~on October 19, 2009~~ from cash on hand to acquire ~~Phoenix.~~Phoenix and fund related compensation arrangements. Aside from the maximum of $5 million of contingent consideration and compensation which may be payable in fiscal year 2011, we do not foresee the need to make significant capital investments into Phoenix and expect Phoenix to generate positive operating cash flows.

After the close of our fiscal third quarter, we paid approximately $5.9 million on January 22, 2010 from cash on hand to acquire Casals. Through a post-closing net working capital adjustment, we will either pay or receive proceeds based on the final determination of net working capital at closing to the extent that the amount thereof is greater or less than estimated net working capital at closing. We do not expect such adjustment to have a significant impact on our liquidity.

As we continue our acquisition strategy, we may need to borrow to fund larger acquisitions or multiple acquisitions.

Cash provided by operating activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 was ~~$33.4~~$15.6 million, as compared to ~~$38.0~~$70.2 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 3, 2008.~~January 2, 2009. Cash generated from operations in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 benefited from the combination of our continued profitable revenue growth but declined from ~~new contracts combined with seasonal payment cycles associated with our largest customers’ fiscal calendar, offset by~~the nine months ended January 2, 2009 due to changes in net working capital. The change in net working capital was primarily due to increases in accounts receivable and restricted cash. The increase in accounts receivable was due to an increase in ~~restricted cash~~revenue and ~~amounts spent on helicopter assets considered available for sale. Net of revenue growth, our accounts receivable collections efforts continued to be effective.~~an increase in Days Sales Outstanding (“DSO”), a key metric utilized by management to monitor collection efforts on accounts receivable, which was 6876 days at the end of the ~~second~~third quarter of fiscal year 2010, ~~consistent with~~compared to 69 days at the end of the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, above our expectation of high 60s to low 70s on an ongoing basis. This increase in DSO is from longer review cycles for our DoS invoices as well as a contractual payment term change on the CFT contract. This increase is expected to be temporary and not affect our ability to collect receivables.

~~We have~~

During April 2007 we entered into interest rate swap agreements to hedge our exposure to interest rate increases related to our credit facility. These agreements are more fully described in Note 7 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.

We are required, under certain circumstances as defined in our credit agreement, to use a percentage of excess cash generated from operations to reduce the outstanding principal of the term loans in the following year. Such payments are due near the end of the first quarter of the following fiscal year. We paid $23.4 million in June 2009 to satisfy our fiscal year 2009 requirement. The excess cash flow measurement is an annual requirement of the credit agreement.

In the ~~first two quarters of fiscal year~~nine months ended January 1, 2010, we repurchased $24.3 million of our senior subordinated notes. As of ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, $375.4 million of principal was outstanding under our senior subordinated notes. Our senior subordinated notes mature February 2013. Interest accrues on our senior subordinated notes and is payable semi-annually.

Debt Covenants and Other Matters

Our credit facility and senior subordinated notes contain various financial covenants, including minimum levels of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”), minimum interest and fixed charge coverage ratios, and maximum capital expenditures and total leverage ratio. Non-financial covenants restrict our ability to dispose of assets; incur additional indebtedness; prepay other indebtedness or amend certain debt instruments; pay dividends; create liens on assets; enter into sale and leaseback transactions; make investments, loans or advances; issue certain equity instruments; make acquisitions; engage in mergers or consolidations or engage in certain transactions with affiliates; and otherwise restrict certain corporate activities. We ~~had no instances of noncompliance~~were in compliance with ~~our~~the various financial and non-financial covenants set forth in our debt instruments at ~~October 2, 2009.~~January 1, 2010.

Our credit facility and senior subordinated notes contain specific covenant requirements which may limit our ability to make acquisitions or require us to obtain debt holder ~~approval.~~approval to do so. We may also be limited by our debt agreements as to the cumulative size of our acquisitions, the type of businesses we may purchase and the forecasted effects on our overall financial statements.

OFF BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, we did not have any off balance sheet arrangements as defined under SEC rules. We recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities at fair value in our consolidated balance sheets. Refer to Note 7 of our consolidated financial statements for additional disclosure on derivatives and Note 11 for additional disclosure on variable interest entities.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations are based on our consolidated financial statements and related footnotes contained within this Quarterly Report. Our more critical accounting policies used in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements were discussed in our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009, filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates from the information provided in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009.

The process of preparing financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions to determine certain of the assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are based upon what we believe is the best information available at the time of the estimates or assumptions. The estimates and assumptions could change materially as conditions within and beyond our control change. Accordingly, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

Based on an assessment of our accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, we believe that our consolidated financial statements provide a meaningful and fair perspective of our consolidated financial condition and results of operations.

Interim Goodwill Assessment

We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually and when an event occurs or circumstances change to suggest that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Our annual testing date is at the fiscal end of February of each fiscal year. We test goodwill for impairment by first comparing the book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units. If the fair value is less than the book value, we record impairment, if any, to the extent that the estimated fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value.

We estimate a portion of the fair value of our reporting units under the income approach by utilizing a discounted cash flow model based on several factors including balance sheet carrying values, historical results, our most recent forecasts, and other relevant quantitative and qualitative information. We discount the related cash flow forecasts using the weighted-average cost of capital method at the date of evaluation. We also use the market approach to estimate the remaining portion of our reporting unit valuation. This technique utilizes comparative market multiples in the valuation estimate. We have historically applied a 50%/50% weighting to each approach. While the income approach has the advantage of utilizing more company specific information, the market approach has the advantage of capturing market based transaction pricing. Significant changes in these forecasts, the discount rate selected, or the weighting of the income and market approach could affect the estimated fair value of one or more of our reporting units and could result in a goodwill impairment charge in a future period.

The combined estimated fair value of all of our reporting units from the weighted total of the market approach and income approach often results in a premium over our market capitalization, commonly referred to as a control premium. The calculated control premium percentage is evaluated and compared to an estimated acceptable ~~maximum~~midpoint percentage. In the event that the calculated control premium is above this maximum, a portion of the excess control premium is allocated to reduce the fair value of each reporting unit in order to further access whether any reporting units have incurred goodwill impairment. Assessing the acceptable control premium percentage requires judgment and is impacted by external factors such as observed control premiums from comparable transactions derived from the prices paid on recent publically disclosed acquisitions in our industry.

In determining whether an interim triggering event has occurred, management monitors (i) the actual performance of the business relative to the fair value assumptions used during our annual goodwill impairment test, (ii) significant changes to future expectations (iii) and our market capitalization, which is based on our average stock price and average common shares over a recent timeframe. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 2, 2009,~~January 1, 2010, we did not identify any triggering events which would require an update to our annual impairment test.

ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS

We have presented the information about accounting pronouncements not yet implemented in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report.


~~ITEM 3.~~		ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

There have been no material changes in market risk from the information provided in Part II, Item 7A, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009, filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009.


~~ITEM 4.~~		ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. In addition, the disclosure controls and procedures ensure that information required to be disclosed is accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer (“CEO”) and chief financial officer (“CFO”), allowing timely decisions regarding required disclosure. As of the last fiscal quarter covered by this report, based on an evaluation carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) under the Exchange Act of 1934), the CEO and CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION


~~ITEM 1.~~		ITEM 1. LEGAL MATTERS

Information related to various commitments and contingencies is described in Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements.


~~ITEM 1A.~~		ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in risk factors, except as noted below, from those described in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009, filed with the SEC on June 11, 2009.

If we fail to integrate the businesses we acquire or successfully manage the acquisition process, our business operations may be disrupted, stockholder value may be diluted, management attention may be diverted and our results of operations may be harmed.


~~ITEM 2.~~		~~UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS~~

We have recently acquired two complementary businesses. Additonally, our business strategy contemplates pursuing additional strategic acquisitions of complementary businesses and service lines. Acquistion transactions require substantial management resources and may disrupt our business and divert our management from other responsibilities. Acquisitions are accompanied by other risks, including:

~~Our Board~~

the difficulty of ~~Directors authorized~~integrating the operations and personnel of the acquired companies;

the inability of our management to maximize our financial and strategic position by the successful incorporation of acquired personnel into our service offerings;

we may not realize anticipated synergies or financial growth;

we may assume material liabilities that were not identified during due diligence, including potential regulatory penalties resulting from the acquisition target’s previous activities;

difficulty maintaining uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies, with respect to accounting matters and otherwise;

the potential loss of key employees of acquired companies;

the impairment of relationships with employees and customers as a result of changes in management and operational structure; and

acquisitions may require us to ~~repurchase up to $25.0 million per fiscal year~~invest significant amounts of our outstanding common stock and/or senior subordinated notes during fiscal years 2009 and 2010. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, we purchased 54,900 shares and $10 million of senior subordinated notes, including applicable fees, which utilized $10.7 million of our availability under the fiscal year 2010 portion of the authorization. During the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, we purchased $14.3 million of senior subordinated notes, which utilized almost all of the remaining availability except for a~~de minimusamount. Shares of common stock repurchased under this plan are held as treasury shares. Additionally, 21,675 of these shares were issued to our CEO to settle equity-based compensation liabilities~~cash resulting in ~~726,425 treasury shares as~~dilution of ~~October 2, 2009.~~stockholder value.


~~ITEM 3.~~		~~DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES~~

~~None.~~


~~ITEM 4.~~		~~SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS~~

~~Our Annual Meeting~~Any inability to successfully integrate the operations and personnel associated with an acquired business and/or service line may harm our business and results of ~~stockholders was held on July 14, 2009. The following is a tabulation of the voting of each proposal presented at the annual meeting.~~

~~Proposal 1: Election of two Class III directors to serve on the Board for terms of three years:~~

Nominee Votes For Votes Withheld Broker Non-Votes
Ramzi M. Musallam 46,129,690 9,069,013 —
Mark H. Ronald 54,564,955 633,748 —
operation.

4144

~~Proposal 2: Ratification of the selection of Deloitte and Touche LLP, and independent registered public accounting firm, as our independent auditors for fiscal year 2010:~~


~~Votes for:~~			~~55,176,103~~
~~Votes against:~~			~~19,295~~
~~Abstentions:~~			~~3,305~~
~~Broker non-votes:~~			—


~~ITEM 5.~~		~~OTHER INFORMATION~~ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.


~~ITEM 6.~~		ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES None. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS None. ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION None. ITEM 6. EXHIBITS


Exhibit
Number			Description

	~~1.1~~		~~Underwriting Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to DynCorp International Inc.’s~~ ~~Form S-3/A~~ ~~with the SEC on August 4, 2009)~~
	31.1	*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	31.2	*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	32.1	*	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	32.2	*	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


*		Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	DYNCORP INTERNATIONAL INC.
	/s/ Michael J. Thorne
	Michael J. Thorne
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer Date: ~~November 9, 2009~~February 8, 2010

4245


	Page

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Forward-Looking Statements

Item 1. Financial Statements

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income—Three Months Ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009 ~~and October 3, 2008~~		3

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income—~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009 ~~and October 3, 2008~~		4

Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheets—~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009		5

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows—~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009 ~~and October 3, 2008~~		6

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity—~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~October~~January 1, 2010 and January 2, ~~2009 and April 3,~~ 2009		7

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		8

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		2730

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		4043

Item 4. Controls and Procedures		4043

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Matters		4144

Item 1A. Risk Factors		4144

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		4145

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities		4145

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		4145

Item 5. Other Information		4245

Item 6. Exhibits		4245

Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2


(Dollars in thousands)	LCM/GSDS		ISS /GLS			MTSS/GPSS		Total		LCM/GSDS		ISS/GLS			MTSS/GPSS		Total
Goodwill balance as of April 3, 2009	$	39,935	$	300,094		$	80,151	$	420,180	$	39,935	$	300,094		$	80,151	$	420,180
Reallocation of goodwill		169,138		(300,094	)		130,956		—		169,138		(300,094	)		130,956		—
Phoenix acquisition											28,176		—			—		28,176

Goodwill balance as of October 2, 2009	$	209,073	$	—		$	211,107	$	420,180
Goodwill balance as of January 1, 2010										$	237,249	$	—		$	211,107	$	448,356


	Three Months Ended						Three Months Ended
	October 2,			October 3,
	2009			2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
(Amounts in thousands)							January 1, 2010			January 2, 2009
Current portion:
Federal	$	5,346		$	11,024		$	9,292		$	(27,825	)
State		676			842			781			(1,397	)
Foreign		1,968			1,271			1,100			1,046

		7,990			13,137
								11,173			(28,176	)

Deferred portion:
Federal		5,146			(3,874	)		(687	)		38,586
State		172			(130	)		(23	)		1,290
Foreign		(7	)		(2	)		30			(61	)

		5,311			(4,006	)		(680	)		39,815

Provision for income taxes	$	13,301		$	9,131		$	10,493		$	11,639


	Six Months Ended
	October 2,			October 3,
	2009			2008
	(Dollars in thousands)
Current portion:
Federal	$	8,509		$	20,610
State		1,069			1,650
Foreign		2,810			3,811

		12,388			26,071


Deferred portion:
Federal		13,105			(7,370	)
State		438			(246	)
Foreign		(3	)		(8	)

		13,540			(7,624	)


Provision for income taxes	$	25,928		$	18,447


	October 2,			April 3,
	2009			2009
	(Dollars in thousands)
(Amounts in thousands)							January 1, 2010			April 3, 2009
Term loans	$	176,637		$	200,000		$	176,637		$	200,000
9.5% Senior subordinated notes⁽¹⁾		375,387			399,912			375,449			399,912

		552,024			599,912
Total debt								552,086			599,912
Less current portion of long-term debt		(14,137	)		(30,540	)		(29,137	)		(30,540	)


Total long-term debt	$	537,887		$	569,372		$	522,949		$	569,372


(1)		This includes the impact of the discount which had a carrying value of ($0.8) million and ($1.0) million as of ~~October 2, 2009~~January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009, respectively.


*		Plus applicable margin (2.5% at ~~October 2, 2009)~~January 1, 2010).


		Three Months			Three Months
	AMOUNT OF GAIN OR (LOSS) RECOGNIZED IN	Ended			Ended
Derivatives not Designated	INCOME ON DERIVATE	October 2,			October 3,
as Hedging Instruments	Line Item in Statements	2009			2008
under ASC 815	of Income	Amount			Amount
Interest rate derivatives	Other (loss)/ income, net	$	(319	)	$	—


Total		$	(319	)	$	—


		Six Months			Six Months
	AMOUNT OF GAIN OR (LOSS) RECOGNIZED IN	Ended			Ended			AMOUNT OF GAIN OR (LOSS) RECOGNIZED	Three Months Ended		Three Months Ended
Derivatives not Designated	INCOME ON DERIVATE	October 2,			October 3,			IN INCOME ON DERIVATE	January 1, 2010		January 2, 2009
as Hedging Instruments	Line Item in Statements	2009			2008			Line Item in Statements
under ASC 815	of Income	Amount			Amount			of Income	Amount		Amount
Interest rate derivatives	Other (loss)/ income, net	$	(506	)	$	(404	)	Other (loss)/ income, net	$	11	$	—


Total		$	(506	)	$	(404	)		$	11	$	—


Six month period ending April 2, 2010	$	259
Three month period ending April 2, 2010			$	84
Fiscal year ending April 1, 2011		229		182
Fiscal year ending March 30, 2012 and thereafter		62		62

Total	$	550	$	328


				Weighted
	Outstanding			Average
	Restricted			Grant Date
	Stock Units			Fair Value
Outstanding, April 3, 2009		345,895		$	16.71
Units granted		607,050		$	17.05
Units forfeited		(86,970	)	$	16.83
Units vested and settled⁽¹⁾		(66,350	)	$	17.99

Outstanding, January 1, 2010		799,625		$	16.85


Six month fiscal period ended April 2, 2010	$	2,217
Fiscal year ended April 1, 2011		3,846
Fiscal year ended March 30, 2012 and thereafter		4,619

Total	$	10,682


⁽¹⁾		Includes RSUs accounted for as liability awards presented in Note 9.


⁽¹⁾		Corporate assets primarily include cash, deferred income taxes, and deferred debt issuance cost.


	Contingent Earn-Out
(amounts in thousands)	Consideration
Beginning balance	$	—
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) included in earnings (or changes in net assets)		71
Purchases, issuances, and settlements		2,707
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		—

Ending balance	$	2,778


The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings (or changes in net assets) attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date	$	71


Nominee	Votes For		Votes Withheld		Broker Non-Votes
Ramzi M. Musallam		46,129,690		9,069,013		—
Mark H. Ronald		54,564,955		633,748		—