UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
((Mark One)
   
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31,June 30, 2010
or
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from                    to                    
Commission File Number 1-584
FERRO CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Ohio
(State of Corporation)
 34-0217820
(IRS Employer Identification No.)
   
1000 Lakeside Avenue
Cleveland, OH

(Address of Principal executive offices)
 
44114
(Zip Code)
216-641-8580
(Telephone Number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YESþ NOo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YESo NOo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
       
Large accelerated filero Accelerated filerþ Non-accelerated filero
Smaller reporting companyo
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting companyo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). YESo NOþ
At March 31,June 30, 2010, there were 86,129,13786,129,962 shares of Ferro Common Stock, par value $1.00, outstanding.
 
 

 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
     
 
     
 Page 3
     
 Page 1720
     
 Page 2331
     
 Page 2432
     
 
     
 Page 2533
     
 Page 2533
     
 Page 2533
     
 Page 2533
     
 Page 2533
     
 Page 2533
     
 Page 2533
     
Exhibit 10.1
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2

 

2


PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Item 1.Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Ferro Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations
                        
 Three months ended  Three months ended Six months ended 
 March 31,  June 30, June 30, 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 (Dollars in thousands,  (Dollars in thousands, 
 except per share amounts)  except per share amounts) 
Net sales
 $492,865 $357,809  $543,485 $399,277 $1,036,350 $757,086 
Cost of sales 385,931 302,563  421,155 334,048 807,086 636,611 
              
Gross profit 106,934 55,246  122,330 65,229 229,264 120,475 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 70,948 68,128  69,852 62,480 140,800 130,608 
Impairment charges 2,202     2,202  
Restructuring charges 11,130 1,398  21,205  (309) 32,335 1,089 
Other expense (income):  
Interest expense 12,911 11,174  13,766 17,190 26,677 28,364 
Interest earned  (331)  (268)  (133)  (205)  (464)  (473)
Foreign currency losses, net 3,548 1,829 
Foreign currency (gains) losses, net  (302) 1,100 3,246 2,929 
Miscellaneous (income) expense, net  (1,251) 533   (3,571) 321  (4,822) 854 
              
Income (loss) before income taxes
 7,777  (27,548) 21,513  (15,348) 29,290  (42,896)
Income tax expense (benefit) 8,589  (7,819) 13,919  (4,276) 22,508  (12,095)
              
Loss from continuing operations
  (812)  (19,729)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
 7,594  (11,072) 6,782  (30,801)
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes   (242)   (116)   (358)
              
Net loss
  (812)  (19,971)
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests  (744) 364 
Net income (loss)
 7,594  (11,188) 6,782  (31,159)
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests 494 620  (250) 984 
              
Net loss attributable to Ferro Corporation
  (68)  (20,335)
Net income (loss) attributable to Ferro Corporation
 7,100  (11,808) 7,032  (32,143)
Dividends on preferred stock  (165)  (171)  (165)  (199)  (330)  (370)
              
Net loss attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders
 $(233) $(20,506)
Net income (loss) attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders
 $6,935 $(12,007) $6,702 $(32,513)
              
  
Amounts attributable to Ferro Corporation:
  
Loss from continuing operations, net of tax $(68) $(20,093)
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax $7,100 $(11,692) $7,032 $(31,785)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax   (242)   (116)   (358)
              
 $(68) $(20,335) $7,100 $(11,808) $7,032 $(32,143)
              
  
Per common share data
  
Basic and diluted loss attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders: 
Basic and diluted income (loss) attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders: 
From continuing operations $ $(0.46) $0.08 $(0.27) $0.08 $(0.72)
From discontinued operations        (0.01)
              
 $ $(0.46) $0.08 $(0.27) $0.08 $(0.73)
              
  
Cash dividends declared $ $0.01  $ $ $ $0.01 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3


Ferro Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
                
 March 31, December 31,  June 30, December 31, 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
ASSETSASSETS ASSETS
Current assets
  
Cash and cash equivalents $17,694 $18,507  $29,732 $18,507 
Accounts and trade notes receivable, net 316,980 285,638  320,711 285,638 
Inventories 194,370 180,700  197,788 180,700 
Deposits for precious metals 106,874 112,434  55,808 112,434 
Deferred income taxes 19,473 19,618  19,277 19,618 
Other receivables 34,849 27,795  39,460 27,795 
Other current assets 8,191 7,180  6,416 7,180 
          
Total current assets 698,431 651,872  669,192 651,872 
Other assets
  
Property, plant and equipment, net 411,470 432,405  384,940 432,405 
Goodwill 220,318 221,044  216,326 221,044 
Amortizable intangible assets, net 10,297 10,610  12,443 10,610 
Deferred income taxes 130,283 133,705  132,249 133,705 
Other non-current assets 71,653 76,719  66,277 76,719 
          
Total assets $1,542,452 $1,526,355  $1,481,427 $1,526,355 
          
  
LIABILITIES AND EQUITYLIABILITIES AND EQUITY LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
  
Loans payable and current portion of long-term debt $23,234 $24,737  $5,066 $24,737 
Accounts payable 214,815 196,038  206,172 196,038 
Income taxes 11,649 7,241  21,937 7,241 
Accrued payrolls 30,657 20,894  30,581 20,894 
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities 70,014 72,039  92,940 72,039 
          
Total current liabilities 350,369 320,949  356,696 320,949 
Other liabilities
  
Long-term debt, less current portion 400,071 398,720  347,707 398,720 
Postretirement and pension liabilities 201,471 203,743  198,606 203,743 
Deferred income taxes 1,821 1,124  1,286 1,124 
Other non-current liabilities 29,254 31,897  26,342 31,897 
          
Total liabilities 982,986 956,433  930,637 956,433 
Series A convertible preferred stock (approximates redemption value) 9,427 9,427  9,427 9,427 
Equity
  
Ferro Corporation shareholders’ equity:  
Common stock 93,436 93,436  93,436 93,436 
Paid-in capital 329,290 331,376  330,388 331,376 
Retained earnings 356,895 357,128  363,830 357,128 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (70,373)  (60,147)  (87,085)  (60,147)
Common shares in treasury, at cost  (168,735)  (171,567)  (168,729)  (171,567)
          
Total Ferro Corporation shareholders’ equity 540,513 550,226  531,840 550,226 
Noncontrolling interests 9,526 10,269  9,523 10,269 
          
Total equity 550,039 560,495  541,363 560,495 
          
Total liabilities and equity $1,542,452 $1,526,355  $1,481,427 $1,526,355 
          
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4


Ferro Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
                                  
 Ferro Corporation Shareholders      Ferro Corporation Shareholders     
 Accumulated      Accumulated     
 Other      Other     
 Common Shares Comprehensive Non-    Common Shares Comprehensive Non-   
 in Treasury Common Paid-in Retained Income controlling Total  in Treasury Common Paid-in Retained Income controlling Total 
 Shares Amount Stock Capital Earnings (Loss) Interests Equity  Shares Amount Stock Capital Earnings (Loss) Interests Equity 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Balances at December 31, 2008
 8,432 $(197,524) $52,323 $178,420 $401,186 $(98,436) $9,755 $345,724  8,432 $(197,524) $52,323 $178,420 $401,186 $(98,436) $9,755 $345,724 
Net (loss) income  (20,335) 364  (19,971)  (32,143) 984  (31,159)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:  
Foreign currency translation  (17,668) 4  (17,664) 4,977  (4) 4,973 
Postretirement benefit liabilities 1,797 20 1,817  661 661 
Raw material commodity swaps 424 424  559 559 
Interest rate swaps 406 406  2,125 2,125 
                                  
Total comprehensive loss  (34,988)  (22,841)
Cash dividends:  
Common  (437)  (437)  (437)  (437)
Preferred  (171)  (171)  (199)  (199)
Income tax benefit 1 1  1 1 
Stock-based compensation transactions  (1,197) 25,416  (22,993) 2,423   (1,059) 25,586  (22,295) 3,291 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests  (1,275)  (1,275)
                                  
Balances at March 31, 2009
 7,235 $(172,108) $52,323 $155,428 $380,243 $(113,477) $10,143 $312,552 
Balances at June 30, 2009
 7,373 $(171,938) $52,323 $156,126 $368,407 $(90,114) $9,460 $324,264 
                                  
  
Balances at December 31, 2009
 7,375 $(171,567) $93,436 $331,376 $357,128 $(60,147) $10,269 $560,495  7,375 $(171,567) $93,436 $331,376 $357,128 $(60,147) $10,269 $560,495 
Net (loss) income  (68)  (744)  (812)
Other comprehensive income (loss),net of tax: 
Net income (loss) 7,032  (250) 6,782 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax: 
Foreign currency translation  (11,011) 1  (11,010)  (25,726) 31  (25,695)
Postretirement benefit liabilities 168 168   (3,035)  (3,035)
Raw material commodity swaps  (107)  (107)  (107)  (107)
Interest rate swaps 724 724  1,930 1,930 
                                  
Total comprehensive loss  (11,037)  (20,125)
Cash dividends:  
Preferred  (165)  (165)  (330)  (330)
Stock-based compensation transactions  (68) 2,832  (2,086) 746   (70) 2,838  (988) 1,850 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests  (527)  (527)
                                  
Balances at March 31, 2010
 7,307 $(168,735) $93,436 $329,290 $356,895 $(70,373) $9,526 $550,039 
Balances at June 30, 2010
 7,305 $(168,729) $93,436 $330,388 $363,830 $(87,085) $9,523 $541,363 
                                  
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5


Ferro Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                
 Three months ended  Six months ended 
 March 31,  June 30, 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Cash flows from operating activities
  
Net loss $(812) $(19,971)
Depreciation and amortization 20,176 18,609 
Precious metals deposits 5,560  (65,472)
Accounts and trade notes receivable  (39,470) 16,677 
Inventories  (18,397) 46,596 
Accounts payable 25,172  (67,001)
Other changes in current assets and liabilities, net  (429)  (9,470)
Other adjustments, net 15,804 2,738 
     
Net cash provided by (used for) continuing operations 7,604  (77,294)
Net cash used for discontinued operations   (245)
     
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities 7,604  (77,539) $91,772 $(40,486)
Cash flows from investing activities
  
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment  (8,623)  (2,621)  (16,298)  (22,969)
Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses 469 45 
Proceeds from business combination 5,887  
Proceeds from sale of assets 317 72 
          
Net cash used for investing activities  (8,154)  (2,576)  (10,094)  (22,897)
Cash flows from financing activities
  
Net (repayments) borrowings under loans payable  (1,181) 964   (18,787) 28,945 
Proceeds from revolving credit facility 146,100 280,249  205,140 434,624 
Principal payments on revolving credit facility  (145,200)  (186,654)  (206,840)  (384,727)
Principal payments on term loan facility   (762)  (50,000)  (1,525)
Debt issue costs   (8,105)   (9,367)
Cash dividends paid  (165)  (608)  (330)  (636)
Other financing activities 252 117  974 2,135 
          
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities  (194) 85,201   (69,843) 69,449 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  (69)  (206)  (610) 1,235 
          
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents
  (813) 4,880 
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
 11,225 7,301 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 18,507 10,191  18,507 10,191 
          
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
 $17,694 $15,071  $29,732 $17,492 
          
  
Cash paid during the period for:  
Interest $13,279 $13,555  $20,766 $25,792 
Income taxes $5,505 $3,895  $9,830 $5,635 
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

6


Ferro Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
Ferro Corporation (“Ferro,” “we,” “us” or “the Company”) prepared these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Ferro Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the timing and amount of assets, liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses reported and disclosed. Actual amounts could differ from our estimates. In our opinion, we made all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation, and those adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless otherwise noted. Due to differing business conditions, our various initiatives, and some seasonality, the results for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative of the results expected in subsequent quarters or for the full year.
2. Accounting Standards Adopted in the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2010
On January 1, 2010, we adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-16,Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, (“ASU 2009-16”), which is codified inFASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (“ASC”) Topic 860, Transfers and Servicing. This pronouncement provides guidance for derecognition of transferred financial assets. Adoption of ASU 2009-16 had no effect on our consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2010, we adopted ASU 2009-17,Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, (“ASU 2009-17”), which is codified in ASC Topic 810, Consolidations. This pronouncement amends the consolidation guidance that applies to variable interest entities. Adoption of ASU 2009-17 did not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2010, we adopted most of the provisions of ASU 2010-06,Improving Disclosures About Fair Value Measurements, (“ASU 2010-06”), which is codified in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements, and Topic 715, Compensation — Retirement Benefits. The remaining provisions arewill be effective for our fiscal year that begins January 1, 2011. This pronouncement expands disclosures about fair value measurements. Adoption of ASU 2010-06 did not and will not have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.
3. Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13,Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, (“ASU 2009-13”), which is codified in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. This pronouncement applies to all deliverables in contractual arrangements in which a vendor will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13 is2010-17,Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method, (“ASU 2010-17”), which defines a milestone and determines when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. These pronouncements are codified in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and will be effective for our fiscal year that begins January 1, 2011. ASU 2009-13These pronouncements may be applied prospectively or retrospectively, and early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact that adoption of ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2010-17 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

 

7


4. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
                
 March 31, December 31,  June 30, December 31, 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Raw materials $60,909 $54,481  $64,810 $54,481 
Work in process 40,294 37,449  40,240 37,449 
Finished goods 93,167 88,770  92,738 88,770 
          
Total $194,370 $180,700  $197,788 $180,700 
          
In the production of some of our products, we use precious metals, some of which we obtain from financial institutions under consignment agreements with terms of one year or less. The financial institutions retain ownership of the precious metals and charge us fees based on the amounts we consign. These fees were $1.1$1.3 million and $1.3$1.2 million for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $2.4 million and $2.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and were charged to cost of sales. We had on hand precious metals owned by participants in our precious metals program of $118.9$63.9 million at March 31,June 30, 2010, and $101.4 million at December 31, 2009, measured at fair value based on market prices for identical assets. In 2009, several participants in our precious metals program renewed their requirement for us to deliver cash collateral to secure our obligations arising under the consignment agreements. We had delivered $106.9$55.8 million at March 31,June 30, 2010, and $112.4 million at December 31, 2009, in cash collateral to those financial institutions.
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is reported net of accumulated depreciation of $641.3$629.4 million at March 31,June 30, 2010, and $643.9 million at December 31, 2009. Unpaid capital expenditure liabilities, which are noncash investing activities, were $6.0$6.1 million at March 31,June 30, 2010, and $11.4$9.3 million at March 31,June 30, 2009.
In the first quarter of 2010, we discontinued manufacturing activities at our Limoges, France, plant, which indicated a possible impairment of the plant’s real estate assets. We estimated the fair value of these assets at $4.0 million based upon a third partythird-party purchase offer (a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy) and recorded $2.2 million of impairment charges.
In the second quarter of 2010, we initiated restructuring activities at our Uden, Netherlands, facility. The restructuring action and planned closure of this facility triggered an impairment of the carrying values of the facility’s property, plant and equipment. We estimated the fair value of these assets primarily based on third-party appraisals (a Level 3 measurement within the fair value hierarchy) and recorded an impairment of $2.3 million as part of the restructuring charges.
6. Financing and Long-term Debt
Loans payable and current portion of long-term debt consisted of the following:
                
 March 31, December 31,  June 30, December 31, 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Loans payable to banks $7,157 $5,891  $4,230 $5,891 
Accounts receivable asset securitization program 15,096 17,762   17,762 
Current portion of long-term debt 981 1,084  836 1,084 
          
Total $23,234 $24,737  $5,066 $24,737 
          

 

8


Long-term debt consisted of the following:
                
 March 31, December 31,  June 30, December 31, 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
$172.5 million 6.50% Convertible Senior Notes, net of unamortized discounts $157,810 $156,896  $158,745 $156,896 
Revolving credit facility 2,600 1,700   1,700 
Term loan facility 231,385 231,385  181,385 231,385 
Capitalized lease obligations 5,867 5,669  5,374 5,669 
Other notes 3,390 4,154  3,039 4,154 
          
 401,052 399,804  348,543 399,804 
Less current portion  (981)  (1,084)  (836)  (1,084)
          
Total $400,071 $398,720  $347,707 $398,720 
          
In June 2010, we made an early principal payment of $50 million on our outstanding term loans and wrote off $1.5 million of related unamortized fees.
We have an asset securitization program for Ferro’s U.S. trade accounts receivable. In June 2010, we extended the maturity of that facility until May 2011. We maintain several international programs to sell trade accounts receivable to financial institutions. Ferro had received net proceeds under the international programs of $8.7$2.6 million at March 31,June 30, 2010, and $10.3 million at December 31, 2009, for outstanding receivables.
7. Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of the following assets and liabilities meeting the definition of a financial instrument approximate their fair values due to the short period to maturity of the instruments:
Cash and cash equivalents;
Notes receivable;
Deposits;
Miscellaneous receivables; and
Short-term loans payable to banks.
Long-term Debt
The following financial instruments are measured at fair value for disclosure purposes:
                                
 March 31, 2010 December 31, 2009  June 30, 2010 December 31, 2009 
 Carrying Fair Carrying Fair  Carrying Fair Carrying Fair 
 Amount Value Amount Value  Amount Value Amount Value 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
$172.5 million 6.50% Convertible Senior Notes $157,810 $168,619 $156,896 $157,191  $158,745 $164,608 $156,896 $157,191 
Revolving credit facility 2,600 2,619 1,700 1,747    1,700 1,747 
Term loan facility 231,385 239,586 231,385 237,047  181,385 185,910 231,385 237,047 
Other notes 3,390 2,517 4,154 3,084  3,039 2,256 4,154 3,084 
The fair values of the Convertible Notes are based on a third party’s estimated bid price. The fair values of the revolving credit facility, the term loan facility, and the other long-term notes are based on the present value of expected future cash flows and assumptions about current interest rates and the creditworthiness of the Company that market participants would use in pricing the debt.

 

9


Derivative Instruments
All derivative instruments are recognized as either assets or liabilities at fair value. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (“OCI”) and reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) into earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings. For derivatives that are not designated as hedges, the gain or loss on the derivative is recognized in current earnings.
Interest rate swaps.To reduce our exposure to interest rate changes on variable-rate debt, we entered into interest rate swap agreements in 2007. These swaps effectively converted $150 million of our variable-rate term loan facility to a fixed rate through June 2011. These swaps are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges. The fair value of these swaps is based on the present value of expected future cash flows, which reflects assumptions about current interest rates and the creditworthiness of the Company that market participants would use in pricing the swaps. The estimated net amount of existing losses at March 31,June 30, 2010, that is expected to be recognized in earnings within the next twelve months is $7.6$6.5 million.
Foreign currency forward contracts.We manage foreign currency risks principally by entering into forward contracts to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on transactions. These forward contracts are not formally designated as hedges. The fair value of these contracts is based on market prices for comparable contracts. We had foreign currency forward contracts with a notional amount of $200.1$170.4 million at March 31,June 30, 2010, and $178.9 million at December 31, 2009.
The following table presents the fair value of derivative instruments on our consolidated balance sheets:
                      
 March 31, December 31,    June 30, December 31,  
 2010 2009 Balance Sheet Location  2010 2009 Balance Sheet Location
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands)  
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
   
Liability derivatives:   
Interest rate swaps $(8,393) $(9,516) Other non-current liabilities $(6,527) $(9,516) Other non-current liabilities
           
   
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
   
Asset derivatives:   
Foreign currency forward contracts $1,800 $899 Other receivables $4,650 $899 Other receivables
           
   
Liability derivatives:   
Foreign currency forward contracts $(390) $(176) Other receivables $(571) $(176) Other receivables
           

10


The inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are classified into the following categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
The classifications within the fair value hierarchy of these financial instruments were as follows:
                                        
 March 31, 2010 December 31,  June 30, 2010 December 31, 
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 2009  Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total 2009 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Assets
  
Foreign currency forward contracts $ 1,410 $ $1,410 $723  $ 4,079 $ $4,079 $723 
                      
  
Liabilities
  
Interest rate swaps $ $(8,393) $ $(8,393) $(9,516) $ $(6,527) $ $(6,527) $(9,516)
                      

10


The following table presents the effect of derivative instruments on our consolidated financial performance for the threesix months ended March 31:June 30:
                                        
 Amount of Loss    Amount of Loss   
 Amount of Loss Reclassified from AOCI Location of Loss  Amount of (Loss) Gain Reclassified from AOCI Location of Gain (Loss) 
 Recognized in OCI into Income Reclassified from  Recognized in OCI into Income Reclassified from 
 2010 2009 2010 2009 AOCI into Income  2010 2009 2010 2009 AOCI into Income 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands)   
Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships:
  
Interest rate swaps $(866) $(906) $(1,989) $(1,536) Interest expense $(996) $119 $(3,985) $(3,180) Interest expense
                  
                        
 Amount of Gain    Amount of Gain (Loss)   
 Recognized in Income Location of  Recognized in Income   
 2010 2009 Gain in Income  2010 2009 Location of Gain (Loss) in Income 
 (Dollars in thousands)    (Dollars in thousands)   
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments:
  
Foreign currency forward contracts $11,427 $567 Foreign currency losses, net $14,684 $(4,089) Foreign currency losses, net
          
8. Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2010, was $8.6$22.5 million, or 110.4%76.9% of pre-tax income. In the prior-year period, we recorded an income tax benefit of $7.8$12.1 million, or 28.0%28.2% of the pre-tax loss. The increase in the effective tax rate resulted primarily resulted from not recognizing a $4.2 million benefit on losses incurred in the Netherlands and Portugal as a consequence of full valuation allowances in both jurisdictions and a $1.5 million tax charge for the elimination of future tax deductions related to Medicare Part D subsidies as a result of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed into law in the U.S. during the first quarter of 2010.2010, a charge of $1.8 million for valuation allowances recorded in the current quarter on deferred assets in Italy, and not recognizing a $9.0 million tax benefit on current losses incurred in jurisdictions with full valuation allowances. Going forward we will continue to monitor both positive and negative evidence in determining whether valuation allowances need to be established or released.

11


9. Contingent Liabilities
In May 2004, the Company was named in an indirect purchaser class action lawsuit seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief relating to alleged violations of the antitrust laws by the Company and others participating in the plastics additives industry. In August 2005, the Company was named in another indirect purchaser class action. In June 2008, the Company was named in four more indirect purchaser class action lawsuits. All of these cases contain similar allegations. The Company intends to vigorously defend these six civil actions, which are all in their early stages. As a result, the Company cannot determine the outcome of these lawsuits at this time.
There are various other lawsuits and claims pending against the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. We do not currently expect the ultimate liabilities, if any, and expenses related to such lawsuits and claims to materially affect the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.

11


10. Retirement Benefits
Information concerning net periodic benefit costs of our U.S. pension plans (including our unfunded nonqualified plans), non-U.S. pension plans, and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans for the three months ended March 31June 30 is as follows:
                                                
 U.S. Pension Plans Non-U.S. Pension Plans Other Benefit Plans  U.S. Pension Plans Non-U.S. Pension Plans Other Benefit Plans 
 2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 2010 2009 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Components of net periodic cost:  
Service cost $7 $7 $882 $1,003 $ $4  $7 $8 $834 $1,045 $ $3 
Interest cost 5,156 5,236 2,735 2,484 607 719  5,156 5,236 2,517 2,612 607 720 
Expected return on plan assets  (4,491)  (3,863)  (1,899)  (1,662)     (4,491)  (3,864)  (1,759)  (1,751)   
Amortization of prior service cost 24 24 147  (97)  (399)  (437) 24 25  (121)  (101)  (399)  (437)
Net amortization and deferral 3,456 3,845  (132) 246  (43)   3,456 3,845 193 260  (43)  
Curtailment and settlement effects    (726)        (3,839)    
                          
Net periodic benefit cost $4,152 $5,249 $1,007 $1,974 $165 $286  $4,152 $5,250 $(2,175) $2,065 $165 $286 
                          
The change inInformation concerning net periodic costbenefit costs of our U.S. pension plans (including our unfunded nonqualified plans), non-U.S. pension plans, and postretirement health care and life insurance benefit plans for the six months ended June 30 is due primarilyas follows:
                         
  U.S. Pension Plans  Non-U.S. Pension Plans  Other Benefit Plans 
  2010  2009  2010  2009  2010  2009 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Components of net periodic cost:                        
Service cost $14  $15  $1,716  $2,048  $  $7 
Interest cost  10,312   10,472   5,252   5,096   1,214   1,439 
Expected return on plan assets  (8,982)  (7,727)  (3,658)  (3,413)      
Amortization of prior service cost  48   49   (253)  (198)  (798)  (874)
Net amortization and deferral  6,912   7,690   340   506   (86)   
Curtailment and settlement effects        (4,565)         
                   
Net periodic benefit cost $8,304  $10,499  $(1,168) $4,039  $330  $572 
                   
In the second quarter of 2010, we recognized a $2.5 million curtailment gain related to our restructuring activities in the Netherlands, a $1.5 million settlement gain fromrelated to our restructuring activities in France, and a $0.2 million settlement loss related to the settlementtransfer of certainsome pension obligations to another company in Japan whereGermany. In the first quarter of 2010, we recognized a $0.7 million settlement gain due to the transfer of some pension obligations and related assets were transferred to a defined contribution plan.plan in Japan. In addition, the improvement through December 2009 in the valuation of pension investments increased the amount of our expected return on plan assets and lowered the amount of amortization of our unrecognized net actuarial losses.

12


11. Stock-Based Compensation
On April 30, 2010, our shareholders approved the 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), which was adopted by the Board of Directors on February 26, 2010, subject to such approval. The Plan’s purpose is to promote the Company’s long-term financial interests and growth by attracting, retaining and motivating high quality key employees and directors and aligning their interests with those of its shareholders. The Plan reserves 5,000,000 shares of common stock to be issued for grants of several different types of long-term incentives including stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, performance shares, other common-stock-based awards, and dividend equivalent rights. As of June 30, 2010, no grants had been made under the Plan.
The 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Previous Plan”) was replaced by the Plan, and no future grants may be made under the Previous Plan. However, any outstanding awards or grants made under the Previous Plan will continue until the end of their specified terms.
The stock-based compensation transactiontransactions in equity consisted of the following for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2010:
                        
 Common Shares    Common Shares   
 in Treasury Paid-in  in Treasury Paid-in 
 Shares Amount Capital  Shares Amount Capital 
 (In thousands)  (In thousands) 
Stock options  (13) $370 $83   (16) $422 $570 
Deferred stock units  (34) 832  (730)  (34) 832  (554)
Restricted shares  (132) 3,242  (3,074)  (131) 3,232  (2,792)
Performance shares, net 111  (995) 1,018  111  (995) 1,135 
Directors’ deferred compensation   (617) 617    (653) 653 
Preferred stock conversions        
              
Total  (68) $2,832 $(2,086)  (70) $2,838 $(988)
              
12. Restructuring and Cost Reduction Programs
During the first quarterhalf of 2010, we continued several restructuring programs and initiated new programs across a number of our business segments with the objectives of leveraging our global scale, realigning and lowering our cost structure and optimizing capacity utilization. The programs are primarily associated with our European operations. Management continues to evaluate our business, and therefore, there may be supplemental provisions for new plan initiatives as well as changes in estimates to amounts previously recorded, as payments are made or actions are completed.

12


To date, we have made substantial progress on the restructuring activities, including exiting manufacturing facilities and eliminating positions. TotalFor the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, total charges resulting from these activities were $12.1$34.2 million and $1.5$4.8 million, for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, of which $1.0$1.9 million and $0.1$3.7 million, respectively, were recorded in cost of sales as they relate to accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed, and the remaining $11.1$32.3 million and $1.4$1.1 million, respectively, were reported as restructuring charges.

13


The following restructuring programs had significant activities in the first quarterhalf of 2010:
Restructuring Program in Limoges, France
In the first quarter of 2010, we discontinued manufacturing activities at our Color and& Glass Performance Materials facility in Limoges, France. We expect the restructuring action will be completed by the end of 2010. When the restructuring is completed,2010, at which time the Limoges site will be closed.
As previously disclosed, we expect to eliminate approximately 125 positions as a result of thethis restructuring. We expect to record pre-tax charges of approximately $29 million related to the actions. The expected charges include approximately $18 million for employee severance, approximately $7 million in site cleanup and other costs, and approximately $4 million in asset write-offs.
As of December 31, 2009, we had eliminated 55 employee positions at the Limoges, France, facility.positions. We had incurred approximately $9.3 million in total charges, including $0.6 million related to accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed, $6.9 million for employee severance,severances, and $1.8 million in other related costs.
InDuring the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2010, this restructuring program resulted in the elimination of 19we eliminated 46 additional employee positions at the Limoges, France, facility. In that three month period, wepositions. We incurred approximately $3.5$11.6 million related to this restructuring effort, of which $0.6in total charges, including $1.2 million was recorded in cost of sales as it relatesrelated to accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed. The remaining $2.9$10.4 million, including $2.6$10.9 million for employee severanceseverances and $0.3$0.9 million in other exit costs, partially offset by a $1.4 million pension settlement credit, was reported as restructuring charges.
Restructuring Program in Castanheira do Ribatejo, Portugal
In March 2010, we initiated restructuring activities at our Castanheira do Ribatejo Portugal, facility.facility in Portugal. We plan to discontinue all operations and close the facility atby the end of 2010. Currently,2010 manufacturing operations for our Color and& Glass Performance Materials and Specialty Plastics businesses operatelocated at this facility. Certain production capacity will be transferred to other European locations.
As a result of thethese restructuring actions, we expect to eliminate approximately 126 employee positions. We expect to record pre-tax charges of approximately $14 million related to the actions. The expected charges include approximately $8 million for employee severance, approximately $2 million in site cleanup and other costs, and approximately $4 million in asset write-offs.
As of March 31, 2010,During the restructuring activity had eliminatedsix months ended June 30, positions. In the three-month period ended March 31, 2010, we eliminated 33 employee positions. We incurred approximately $7.2$7.5 million in total restructuring charges, at this facility, of which $0.2 million was recorded in cost of sales as it relates to accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed. The remaining $7.0$7.3 million, including $6.8 million for employee severance and $0.2$0.5 million in other costs, was reported as restructuring charges.

 

1314


Restructuring Program in Rotterdam, Netherlands
In April 2010, we initiated additional restructuring actions to reduce costs related to the Company’s European Specialty Plastics manufacturing. As a result of this action, plastics manufacturing in Rotterdam, Netherlands, will be consolidated into our existing operations in Almazora, Spain, and the Rotterdam plant will be closed.
As a result of these restructuring actions, we expect to eliminate approximately 44 positions. We expect to record pre-tax charges of approximately $6 million related to the actions. The expected charges include approximately $6 million for employee severance and approximately $3 million in site cleanup and other exit costs, partially offset by a pension curtailment gain of approximately $3 million.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we eliminated 38 employee positions. We incurred approximately $3.3 million in total charges, of which $0.2 million was recorded in cost of sales as it relates to accelerated depreciation of assets to be disposed. The remaining $3.1 million, including $4.9 million for employee severance and $0.6 million in other costs, partially offset by a $2.4 million pension curtailment credit, was reported as restructuring charges.
Restructuring Program in Uden, Netherlands
In May 2010 after consulting with workers’ representatives, we initiated restructuring actions to reduce costs related to the Company’s European dielectrics manufacturing, which is part of our Electronic Materials business. As a result of this action, dielectrics products that are currently manufactured in Uden, Netherlands, will be transferred to other locations, and the Uden plant will be closed.
As a result of these restructuring actions, we expect to eliminate approximately 120 positions. We expect to record pre-tax charges of approximately $13 million related to the actions. The expected charges include approximately $9 million for employee severance and approximately $4 million in site cleanup and other exit costs. The restructuring actions are expected to be completed by the end of 2010.
During the six months ended June 30, 2010, we eliminated 3 employee positions. We incurred approximately $9.8 million in total charges, including $7.4 million for employee severance and $2.4 million in other costs primarily related to asset impairment. These costs were reported as restructuring charges.

15


The activities and accruals related to our restructuring and cost reduction programs were as follows:
             
  Employee  Other    
  Severance  Costs  Total 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Balance at December 31, 2009 $3,081  $1,518  $4,599 
Gross restructuring charges  10,327   990   11,317 
Reserve adjustments     (187)  (187)
          
Net restructuring charges  10,327   803   11,130 
Cash payments  (4,796)  (796)  (5,592)
Currency translation adjustment  32   (86)  (54)
          
Balance at March 31, 2010 $8,644  $1,439  $10,083 
          
                 
  Employee  Other  Asset    
  Severance  Costs  Impairment  Total 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Balance at December 31, 2009 $3,081  $1,518  $  $4,599 
Restructuring charges  31,014   (1,021)  2,342   32,335 
Cash payments  (13,125)  (2,321)     (15,446)
Currency translation adjustment  (1,096)  (218)     (1,314)
Non-cash items     3,853   (2,342)  1,511 
             
Balance at June 30, 2010 $19,874  $1,811  $  $21,685 
             
13. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
                 
  Three months ended  Six months ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2010  2009  2010  2009 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Net income (loss) $7,594  $(11,188) $6,782  $(31,159)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:                
Foreign currency translation  (14,685)  22,637   (25,695)  4,973 
Postretirement benefit liabilities  (3,203)  (1,156)  (3,035)  661 
Raw material commodity swaps     135   (107)  559 
Interest rate swaps  1,206   1,719   1,930   2,125 
             
Total comprehensive (loss) income  (9,088)  12,147   (20,125)  (22,841)
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests  524   592   (219)  980 
             
Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to Ferro Corporation $(9,612) $11,555  $(19,906) $(23,821)
             

16


14. Per Share Amounts from Continuing Operations
Details of the calculation of basic and diluted loss per share are shown below:
         
  Three months ended 
  March 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (In thousands, 
  except per share amounts) 
Basic loss per share computation:
        
Net loss attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders $(233) $(20,506)
Adjustment for loss from discontinued operations     242 
       
  $(233) $(20,264)
       
         
Weighted-average common shares outstanding  85,836   44,366 
         
Basic loss per share from continuing operations attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders $  $(0.46)
       
         
Diluted loss per share computation:
        
Net loss attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders $(233) $(20,506)
Adjustment for loss from discontinued operations     242 
Plus: Convertible preferred stock      
       
  $(233) $(20,264)
       
         
Weighted-average common shares outstanding  85,836   44,366 
Assumed exercise of stock options      
Assumed satisfaction of deferred stock unit conditions      
Assumed satisfaction of restricted share conditions      
Assumed conversion of convertible notes      
Assumed conversion of convertible preferred stock      
       
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding  85,836   44,366 
       
         
Diluted loss per share from continuing operations attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders $  $(0.46)
       

14


14. Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The components of comprehensive income (loss) were as follows:
         
  Three months ended 
  March 31, 
  2010  2009 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Net loss $(812) $(19,971)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:        
Foreign currency translation  (11,010)  (17,664)
Postretirement benefit liabilities  168   1,817 
Raw material commodity swaps  (107)  424 
Interest rate swaps  724   406 
       
Total comprehensive loss  (11,037)  (34,988)
Less: Comprehensive (loss) income attributable to noncontrolling interests  (743)  388 
       
Comprehensive loss attributable to Ferro Corporation $(10,294) $(35,376)
       
                 
  Three months ended  Six months ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2010  2009  2010  2009 
  (In thousands, 
  except per share amounts) 
Basic income (loss) per share computation:
                
Net income (loss) attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders $6,935  $(12,007) $6,702  $(32,513)
Adjustment for loss from discontinued operations     116      358 
             
  $6,935  $(11,891) $6,702  $(32,155)
             
                 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding  85,783   44,701   85,809   44,533 
                 
Basic income (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders $0.08  $(0.27) $0.08  $(0.72)
             
                 
Diluted income (loss) per share computation:
                
Net income (loss) attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders $6,935  $(12,007) $6,702  $(32,513)
Adjustment for loss from discontinued operations     116      358 
Plus: Convertible preferred stock            
             
  $6,935  $(11,891) $6,702  $(32,155)
             
                 
Weighted-average common shares outstanding  85,783   44,701   85,809   44,533 
Assumed exercise of stock options  212      225    
Assumed satisfaction of deferred stock unit conditions  88      71    
Assumed satisfaction of restricted share conditions  347      325    
Assumed conversion of convertible notes            
Assumed conversion of convertible preferred stock            
             
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding  86,430   44,701   86,430   44,533 
             
                 
Diluted income (loss) per share from continuing operations attributable to Ferro Corporation common shareholders $0.08  $(0.27) $0.08  $(0.72)
             
15. Reporting for Segments
The Company has six reportable segments: Electronic Materials, Performance Coatings, Electronic Materials, Color and Glass Performance Materials, Polymer Additives, Specialty Plastics and Pharmaceuticals. We have combined our Tile Coating Systems and Porcelain Enamel business units into one reportable segment, Performance Coatings, because of their similar economic and operating characteristics.
The accounting policies of our segments are consistent with those described for our consolidated financial statements in the summary of significant accounting policies contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. We measure segment income for internal reporting purposes as income from continuing operations before unallocated corporate expenses, impairment charges, restructuring charges, other expense (income) items such as interest expense, and income tax expense. Unallocated corporate expenses primarily consist of corporate employment costs and professional services.

17


Net sales to external customers by segment are presented in the table below. Sales between segments were not material.
                        
 Three months ended  Three months ended Six months ended 
 March 31,  June 30, June 30, 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Electronic Materials $147,233 $82,489  $174,528 $100,570 $321,761 $183,059 
Performance Coatings 128,191 108,588  142,137 117,333 270,328 225,921 
Color and Glass Performance Materials 99,332 67,416  97,697 76,350 197,029 143,766 
Polymer Additives 74,476 59,447  79,664 62,998 154,140 122,445 
Specialty Plastics 38,373 34,859  43,359 36,934 81,732 71,793 
Pharmaceuticals 5,260 5,010  6,100 5,092 11,360 10,102 
              
Total net sales $492,865 $357,809  $543,485 $399,277 $1,036,350 $757,086 
              

15


Each segment’s income (loss) and reconciliations to income (loss) before taxes from continuing operations follow:
                        
 Three months ended  Three months ended Six months ended 
 March 31,  June 30, June 30, 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 2010 2009 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Electronic Materials $28,482 $2,417  $37,397 $6,387 $65,879 $8,804 
Performance Coatings 9,482  (599) 14,422 6,225 23,904 5,626 
Color and Glass Performance Materials 7,283  (2,455) 9,982 2,223 17,265  (232)
Polymer Additives 3,991 1,889  2,836 1,588 6,827 3,477 
Specialty Plastics 1,819 1,462  3,503 2,709 5,322 4,171 
Pharmaceuticals 125 113   (271) 214  (146) 327 
              
Total segment income 51,182 2,827  67,869 19,346 119,051 22,173 
Unallocated corporate expenses 15,196 15,709  15,391 16,597 30,587 32,306 
Impairment charges 2,202     2,202  
Restructuring charges 11,130 1,398  21,205  (309) 32,335 1,089 
Interest expense 12,911 11,174  13,766 17,190 26,677 28,364 
Other expense, net 1,966 2,094 
Other (income) expense, net  (4,006) 1,216  (2,040) 3,310 
              
Income (loss) before income taxes from continuing operations $7,777 $(27,548) $21,513 $(15,348) $29,290 $(42,896)
              
16. Subsequent EventBusiness Combination
On April 20,30, 2010, we announced additional European restructuring initiatives that would discontinue manufacturingFerro Corporation and Heraeus of plastics productsHanau, Germany, acquired from each other certain business lines concerning decoration materials for ceramic and glass products. We acquired Heraeus’ ceramic color business, which advances our position in Rotterdam, Netherlands. This action represents an additional stepthe ceramic colors industry, while Heraeus acquired assets related to our business operations in consolidationprecious metal preparations and lustres for the decoration of European plastics production into our manufacturing siteglass, ceramics, porcelain and tiles. Ferro recognized a pre-tax gain of $7.8 million consisting of a $5.6 million gain from remeasuring to fair value the assets transferred to Heraeus and a $5.6 million bargain purchase gain from the fair value of the net assets acquired exceeding the fair value of the consideration transferred, less a $3.4 million write-off of related goodwill. The gain is included in Almazora, Spain. The consolidation will result in a staffing reduction of approximately 44 positions in manufacturing and supporting functions. Operations will be concluded atmiscellaneous income, net, for the site during the quarterthree months ended June 30, 2010.

18


We expect
The following table summarizes the consideration transferred to record chargesHeraeus and the amounts of approximately $6 millionthe assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:
     
  (Dollars in 
  thousands) 
Fair value of consideration transferred
    
Inventories $1,089 
Property, plant and equipment  164 
Amortizable intangible assets  5,417 
    
  $6,670 
    
     
Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed
    
Cash $5,887 
Accounts receivable  1,399 
Inventories  3,676 
Property, plant and equipment  700 
Amortizable intangible assets  2,544 
Current liabilities  (1,895)
    
  $12,311 
    
The final determination of fair values and certain working capital, pension liability, and net asset adjustments have not been finalized due to the recent closing date, but any adjustments are not expected to be material.
Changes in the three-monthsCompany’s revenues and earnings from this business combination for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, and changes in the Company’s revenues and earnings as if this business combination had occurred on January 1, 2009, are immaterial.
17. Miscellaneous Income and Expense
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, miscellaneous income and expense includes a gain of $7.8 million as a result of a business combination, in which Ferro Corporation and Heraeus acquired from each other certain business lines related to the costsdecoration materials for ceramic and glass products, and a charge of the restructuring. The charges include approximately $6$3.5 million in severance costs, $2 million in sitefor an increased reserve for environmental remediation activities and other charges of $1 million, partially offset bycosts related to a pension curtailment gain of approximately $3 million.non-operating facility in Brazil.

 

1619


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Customer demand improved inincreased during the first2010 second quarter as worldwide markets continuedreflecting a continuing, gradual recovery from the economic downturn in 2009. Demand has improved sequentially in each quarter since the low point experienced during the first quarter of 2009, but remains below the peak levels of mid-2008.2009.
Net sales increased by 38%36% in the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2010, compared with the prior-year period. The primary driver of the increased sales was higher sales volume, including increased volume of precious metals. Increased sales volume contributed approximately 2330 percentage points of the increased sales. Changes in product mix and prices contributed an additional 128 percentage points to the sales increase, while changes in foreign currency exchange rates increasedreduced sales by approximately 32 percentage points. Compared toSales increased in all regions, compared with the prior-year quarter, sales increased in each segment.quarter.
Raw material costs, in aggregate, increased slightlyby approximately $14 million in the first quarter compared with costs in the prior-year period.second quarter of 2009. Changes in product pricing fully offset the increased raw materialsmaterial costs.
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense increased compared withdeclined as a percentage of sales from the prior-year period, primarily as a resultquarter while increasing in total dollars. The primary drivers of the resumption ofincrease in SG&A expense were increased incentive compensation expenseaccruals and higher special charges that were primarily related to manufacturing rationalization projects. Increased SG&A expense was partially offset by lower compensation and benefit expense due to reduced staffing.
An asset impairment charge was recordedRestructuring charges were $21.2 million for the quarter, compared with a small net benefit in the 2010 firstsecond quarter related to a change inof 2009. The charges were primarily the fair value of property at a manufacturing site involved in our restructuring activities.
Restructuring expenses increased, primarily as a result of manufacturing consolidationrestructuring initiatives in Europe, including projects that will result in closing manufacturing operations at sites in the closing of plants in PortugalNetherlands and France. Restructuring expenses are expected to continue during 2010 as we complete a number of projects that are intended to lower manufacturing costs and reduce SG&A expense.
Interest expense increased indeclined during the three months ended March 31, 2010,second quarter compared with the first three monthssecond quarter of 2009. During the 2010 second quarter, higherlower average borrowing levels were the primary driver of the lower interest expense with additional contribution from lower average interest ratesrates. These benefits were largelypartially offset by lower average borrowings. Increasedhigher amortization of fees and discounts wasdiscounts. The 2010 second quarter interest expense also included a primary contributornoncash write-off of unamortized fees and expenses related to a pay down of $50 million of our term loan debt.
As a part of our miscellaneous income and expense for the higher interest expense.
Compared to the prior-year period,second quarter, we recorded a reducednet gain related to a business combination involving the acquisition of a decorative colors business in Germany. In addition, we recorded a charge for an increased reserve for environment remediation costs related to a non-operating facility in Brazil.
We recorded income from continuing operations during the second quarter, compared with a loss from continuing operations in the first quarter of 2010 largelyprior-year period as a result of increased gross profit, a gain on the business combination related to decorative colors and lower interest expense. These improvements were partially offset by higher restructuring and impairment charges, increased SG&A expense, higher interestincome tax expense and higher income taxSG&A expense.
Outlook
Customer demand has gradually improved since early 2009, and our net sales and manufacturing volume have increased from their low point in the first quarter of 2009. Demand for our products is expected to improve induring 2010 compared with 2009, leading to an increase in net sales. It is expected that sales will befor the year. We expect our 2010 quarterly sales to reflect a pattern consistent with our historical seasonality with higher sales in the first half of 2010 thanthe year compared with the second half. The reduction in sales in the second half, consistent with our normal historical patterns.final six months of the year is normally primarily the result of reduced sales during August in Europe, when the traditional period of vacations reduces customer demand, and reduced sales of building-related materials in the final three months of the year as construction activity declines.
We expect to record restructuring charges associated with our current and future restructuring programs including programs funded by our 2009 equity offering.during the remaining months of 2010. The restructuring programs are intended to further rationalize our manufacturing operations in Europe, align our worldwide operations to the current customer demand, and lower our selling, general and administrativeSG&A expense. We expect the resulting lower cost of goods sold and SG&A expense will further reduce our fixed costs and improve profitability, assuming a fixed sales level and a constant product mix.
Subsequent to June 30, 2010, we signed an agreement to purchase a newly constructed manufacturing plant for frits and glazes in Fayoum, Egypt. The acquisition will allow us to cost-effectively serve the growing tile manufacturing market in Egypt, the Middle East and North Africa. The closing of the transaction is subject to governmental approvals and the satisfaction or waiver of other customary closing conditions. Closing is expected in the third quarter of 2010.

20


Factors that could adversely affect our future financial performance are described under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

17


Results of Operations
Comparison of the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2010 and 2009
                
                 Three months ended     
 Three months ended      June 30,     
 March 31,      2010 2009 $ Change % Change 
 2010 2009 $ Change % Change  (Dollars in thousands, 
 (Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)  except per share amounts) 
Net sales
 $492,865 $357,809 $135,056  37.7% $543,485 $399,277 $144,208  36.1%
Cost of sales 385,931 302,563 83,368  27.6% 421,155 334,048 87,107  26.1%
              
Gross profit 106,934 55,246 51,688  93.6% 122,330 65,229 57,101  87.5%
Gross profit percentage  21.7%  15.4%   22.5%  16.3% 
Selling, general and administrative expenses 70,948 68,128 2,820  4.1% 69,852 62,480 7,372  11.8%
Impairment charges 2,202  2,202  
Restructuring charges 11,130 1,398 9,732  696.1% 21,205  (309) 21,514 
Other expense (income):  
Interest expense 12,911 11,174 1,737  15.5% 13,766 17,190  (3,424) 
Interest earned  (331)  (268)  (63)  23.5%  (133)  (205) 72 
Foreign currency losses, net 3,548 1,829 1,719  94.0%
Foreign currency (gains) losses, net  (302) 1,100  (1,402) 
Miscellaneous (income) expense, net  (1,251) 533  (1,784)  (334.7%)  (3,571) 321  (3,892) 
              
Income (loss) before income taxes
 7,777  (27,548) 35,325  (128.2%) 21,513  (15,348) 36,861 
Income tax expense (benefit) 8,589  (7,819) 16,408  (209.8%) 13,919  (4,276) 18,195 
              
Loss from continuing operations
  (812)  (19,729) 18,917  (95.9%)
Income (loss) from continuing operations
 7,594  (11,072) 18,666 
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes   (242) 242  (100.0%)   (116) 116 
              
Net loss
 $(812) $(19,971) $19,159  (95.9%)
Net income (loss)
 $7,594 $(11,188) $18,782 
              
  
Diluted loss per share
 $ $(0.46) $0.46  (100.0%)
Diluted income (loss) per share
 $0.08 $(0.27) $0.35 
              
Net sales increased by 38%36% in the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2010, as customer demand partially recovered followingcontinued to recover from the worldwide economic downturn in 2009. Increased sales volume compared towith the prior-year periodsecond quarter of 2009 was the primary driver of the increased net sales, accounting for 2330 percentage points of the overall sales increase. Changes in product prices and mix accounted for approximately 128 percentage points of the increased sales. In addition, changes in foreign currency exchange rates contributedreduced sales growth by approximately 32 percentage points to the sales growth.points. The changes in sales volume, product mix and prices include the effects of increased sales of precious metals. Higher precious metal sales contributed approximately 1210 percentage points to the overall sales increase duringin the 2010 second quarter.
Gross profit increased as a result of the higher net sales and due to cost reduction actions taken during prior periods, including staffing reductions, plant closures and restructuring actions.restructurings. As a result, gross profit percentage increased to 21.7%22.5% from 15.4%16.3% in the firstsecond quarter of 2009. Charges, primarilyincluding accelerated depreciation related toand severance costs associated with manufacturing rationalization activities, reduced gross profit by approximately $1.6$2.5 million during the first three months of 2010.2010 second quarter. Charges primarily related to manufacturing rationalization activities reduced the 2009 second quarter gross profit by approximately $3.7 million.
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense increased by $2.8$7.4 million in the 2010 second quarter compared with the prior-year period. SG&A expense declined to 12.9% of net sales in the second quarter of 2010, compared with 15.6% of net sales in the second quarter of 2009. An increase in accruals for incentive compensation was a primary driver of the increased SG&A spending. The 2010 second quarter SG&A expense included $5.6 million in special charges, including costs related to expense reduction actions, manufacturing rationalization projects and corporate development expenses. In the 2009 second quarter, SG&A expense included special charges of $3.0 million primarily related to expense reduction initiatives and manufacturing rationalization related charges.

21


Restructuring charges were $21.2 million in the second quarter compared with a net benefit of $0.3 million in the prior-year period. The primary drivers of the charges were previously announced restructuring projects related to closing a plant in Limoges, France, in our Color and Glass Performance Materials business; closing a dielectrics manufacturing site in Uden, the Netherlands in our Electronic Materials business; and closing a Specialty Plastics manufacturing site in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Approximately $20.7 million of the second-quarter restructuring charges were related to employee severance costs.
Interest expense declined by $3.4 million during the second quarter, compared with the prior-year period, largely as a result of lower average borrowing levels. Lower average interest rates also contributed to the decline in interest expense. The decrease in interest expense was partially offset by higher amortization of fees and a noncash charge to write off $1.5 million in unamortized fees related to a $50 million pay down of our term loan debt during the 2010 second quarter.
We manage currency risks in a wide variety of foreign currencies principally by entering into forward contracts to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on transactions arising from international trade. The carrying values of these contracts are adjusted to market value and the resulting gains or losses are charged to income or expense in the period.
As part of our miscellaneous income and expense in the second quarter, we recorded a net pre-tax gain of $7.8 million as a result of a business combination in which Ferro Corporation and Heraeus of Hanau, Germany, acquired from each other certain business lines related to decoration materials for ceramic and glass products. Also included in miscellaneous income and expense for the second quarter was a charge of $3.5 million for an increased reserve for environmental remediation costs related to a non-operating facility in Brazil.
During the second quarter of 2010, income tax expense was $13.9 million, or 64.7% of pre-tax income. In the prior-year period, we recorded an income tax benefit of $4.3 million, or 28% of the pre-tax loss. The increase in the effective tax rate primarily resulted from a charge of $1.8 million for valuations allowances recorded on deferred tax assets in Italy and not recognizing a $4.8 million tax benefit on current losses incurred in jurisdictions with full valuation allowances.

22


In the 2010 second quarter we recorded income from continuing operations of $7.6 million, compared with a loss of $11.1 million in the prior-year period. The improved income was primarily the result of higher gross profit, the gain on a business combination related to ceramic colors and reduced interest expense, partly offset by higher restructuring charges, increased SG&A expense and higher income tax expense.
                 
  Three months ended       
  June 30,       
  2010  2009  $ Change  % Change 
  (Dollars in thousands)    
Segment Sales
                
Electronic Materials $174,528  $100,570  $73,958   73.5%
Performance Coatings  142,137   117,333   24,804   21.1%
Color and Glass Performance Materials  97,697   76,350   21,347   28.0%
Polymer Additives  79,664   62,998   16,666   26.5%
Specialty Plastics  43,359   36,934   6,425   17.4%
Pharmaceuticals  6,100   5,092   1,008   19.8%
              
Total segment sales $543,485  $399,277  $144,208   36.1%
              
                 
Segment Operating Income (Loss)
                
Electronic Materials $37,397  $6,387  $31,010   485.5%
Performance Coatings  14,422   6,225   8,197   131.7%
Color and Glass Performance Materials  9,982   2,223   7,759   349.0%
Polymer Additives  2,836   1,588   1,248   78.6%
Specialty Plastics  3,503   2,709   794   29.3%
Pharmaceuticals  (271)  214   (485)  NM 
              
Total segment operating income $67,869  $19,346  $48,523   250.8%
              
NM — Not meaningful
Electronic Materials Segment Results.Sales increased in Electronic Materials in all product areas, led by higher sales of conductive pastes and powders. Higher sales volume accounted for approximately $57 million of the sales growth, and changes in product mix and prices contributed an additional $17 million in increased sales. An increase of $38 million in precious metal sales, reflecting both volume and pricing, contributed to the overall sales increase. The sales growth was primarily driven by products manufactured in and shipped from the United States. Operating income increased due to a $32 million increase in gross profit that was partially offset by a $1 million increase in SG&A expense. The higher gross profit was largely due to higher sales volume.
Performance Coatings Segment Results.Sales increased in Performance Coatings primarily as a result of increased sales volume. Higher sales volume contributed approximately $28 million to sales growth in the quarter. Changes in product pricing contributed an additional $2 million to sales growth and changes in foreign currency exchange rates reduced sales by approximately $5 million. Sales increased in all regions. Operating income increased as a result of a $12 million increase in gross profit that was partially offset by a $4 million increase in SG&A expense. The increase in gross profit was primarily the result of increased sales volume and higher prices, partially offset by higher raw material costs.
Color and Glass Performance Materials Segment Results.Sales increased in Color and Glass Performance Materials due to higher sales volume and changes in product pricing and mix. Increased sales volume accounted for approximately $19 million of the quarterly sales growth and changes in product pricing and mix contributed an additional $5 million to the increased sales. Partially offsetting this growth was a reduction in sales of approximately $3 million due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Sales growth occurred in Europe, the United States and Asia-Pacific compared with the prior-year quarter. Operating income increased as a result of a $10 million increase in gross profit resulting from higher sales volume and the benefits of manufacturing restructuring. The increase in gross profit was partially offset by a $2 million increase in SG&A expense. The increase in gross profit was primarily due to the benefits from higher sales volume.

23


Polymer Additives Segment Results.Sales increased in Polymer Additives as a result of higher sales volume, with additional contributions from product pricing and mix. Increased sales volume contributed approximately $12 million to the sales growth and changes in product pricing and mix accounted for an additional $6 million in growth. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates reduced sales by approximately $2 million. Sales growth was generated primarily from the United States and Europe, the principal markets for our polymer additives products. Operating income increased as a result of a $3 million increase in gross profit that was partially offset by a $2 million increase in SG&A expense. The increase in gross profit was primarily the result of higher sales volume and product pricing, partially offset by higher raw material costs.
Specialty Plastics Segment Results.Sales increased in Specialty Plastics due to both changes in product mix and price as well as increased sales volume. Changes in product pricing and mix increased sales by approximately $4 million and increased sales volume contributed an additional $3 million to the overall growth. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates reduced sales by approximately $1 million. Sales growth was primarily from the United States. Operating income increased as a result of a $0.3 million increase in gross profit and a $0.5 million reduction in SG&A expense.
Pharmaceuticals Segment Results.Sales increased in the Pharmaceuticals business primarily as a result of product mix changes. The business recorded a segment loss compared with income in the prior-year quarter due to a reduction of $0.1 million in gross profit and an increase of $0.4 million in SG&A expense.
                 
  Three months ended       
  June 30,       
  2010  2009  $ Change  % Change 
  (Dollars in thousands)    
Geographic Revenues
                
United States $277,003  $180,963  $96,040   53.1%
International  266,482   218,314   48,168   22.1%
              
Total $543,485  $399,277  $144,208   36.1%
              
Sales growth was recorded in all regions compared with the prior-year quarter. Sales of products increased in the United States, Europe-Middle East-Africa, Asia-Pacific and Latin America. In the 2010 second quarter, sales of products in the United States were 51% of total sales, compared with 45% in the second quarter of 2009. The increase in international sales was driven by higher sales in the Europe-Middle East-North Africa region. Sales recorded in each region include products exported to customers that are located in other regions.

24


Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
                 
  Six months ended       
  June 30,       
  2010  2009  $ Change  % Change 
  (Dollars in thousands,    
  except per share amounts)    
Net sales
 $1,036,350  $757,086  $279,264   36.9%
Cost of sales  807,086   636,611   170,475   26.8%
              
Gross profit  229,264   120,475   108,789   90.3%
Gross profit percentage  22.1%  15.9%        
Selling, general and administrative expenses  140,800   130,608   10,192   7.8%
Impairment charges  2,202      2,202     
Restructuring charges  32,335   1,089   31,246     
Other expense (income):                
Interest expense  26,677   28,364   (1,687)    
Interest earned  (464)  (473)  9     
Foreign currency losses, net  3,246   2,929   317     
Miscellaneous (income) expense, net  (4,822)  854   (5,676)    
              
Income (loss) before income taxes
  29,290   (42,896)  72,186     
Income tax expense (benefit)  22,508   (12,095)  34,603     
              
Income (loss) from continuing operations
  6,782   (30,801)  37,583     
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of income taxes     (358)  358     
              
Net income (loss)
 $6,782  $(31,159) $37,941     
              
                 
Diluted income (loss) per share
 $0.08  $(0.73) $0.81     
              
Net sales for the six months ended June 30, 2010, increased by 37% compared with the first half of 2009. The primary driver of the sales growth was increased sales volume, accounting for approximately 26 percentage points of the overall sales increase. Changes in product prices and mix accounted for approximately 10 percentage points of the sales increase. In addition, changes in foreign currency exchange rates added less than one percentage point to sales growth. The changes in sales volume, product mix and prices include the effects of increased sales of precious metals. Higher precious metal sales contributed approximately 11 percentage points to the overall sales increase during the first half of 2010.
Gross profit increased as a result of higher net sales and due to cost reduction actions taken during prior periods, including staffing reductions, plant closures and restructuring actions. As a result, gross profit percentage increased to 22.1% in the 2010 first half, compared with 15.9% in the first six months of 2009. Charges, including accelerated depreciation and severance costs associated with manufacturing rationalization activities, reduced gross profit by approximately $4.2 million during the first half of 2010. Gross profit was reduced by charges of $3.7 million during the first half of 2009, primarily related to accelerated depreciation and other costs of manufacturing rationalization activities.
Selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expense increased by $10.2 million in the first three monthshalf of 2010 compared with the first quarterhalf of 2009. SG&A expense was 14.4%declined to 13.6% of net sales down from 19.0% of salesin the first half, compared with 17.3% in the prior-year period. The increase was largely due to a resumptionprimary drivers of performance-basedincreased SG&A expense during the first six months of the year were increased incentive compensation accruals in 2010, compared with no incentive compensation expense in the first quarter of 2009, and higher special charges. SG&A expense inDuring the first threesix months of 2010, $8.0 million in charges were included in SG&A expense, primarily related to severance and other costs related to expense reduction actions, manufacturing rationalization projects, and corporate development activities. During the first half of 2009, SG&A expense included charges of $2.4$4.3 million primarily related to severance charges related to staffing reductionsexpense reduction initiatives and corporate development activities. SG&A expense in the first quarter of 2009 included charges of $1.3 million, primarily from corporate development activities and expenses related to manufacturing rationalization activities.related charges.

 

1825


An asset impairment charge of $2.2 million was recorded in the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2010, related to a reduction in fair value of property at our manufacturing site in Limoges, France. The site is being closed as part of a restructuring initiative.
Restructuring charges increased to $32.3 million during the first half of 2010, driven primarily by $9.7the costs of our European manufacturing rationalization. The largest contributors to the charges in the 2010 first half were previously announced restructuring initiatives involving the closure of a plant in France, two manufacturing sites in the Netherlands, and an additional manufacturing location in Portugal. Approximately $31.0 million of the restructuring charges were related to employee severance costs.
Interest expense declined by $1.7 million in the first quarterhalf of 2010 compared with the prior yearprior-year period. Manufacturing consolidation projectsThe reduction was largely driven by a decline in Portugal and France were the primary contributors to the restructuring charges in the quarter. Both of these projects will result in closing manufacturing sites and consolidating production to our existing facilities in Spain. The restructuring charges for the quarter include $10.3 million in employee severance costs and $0.8 million in other restructuring costs.
Interest expense increased by $1.7 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010, compared with the first three months of 2009. During the quarter, higher average interest rates were largely offset by lower average borrowings. Increasedborrowing levels. Higher amortization of fees and discounts was a driveroffset some of the higher interestbenefit of lower average borrowings. Interest expense in the first three monthshalf of 2010.2010 included a $1.5 million noncash write-off of fees related to a $50 million paydown of our term loan debt during the period.
We manage currency risks in a wide variety of foreign currencies principally by entering into forward contracts to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on transactions arising from international trade. The carrying values of these contracts are adjusted to market value and the resulting gains or losses are charged to income or expense in the period. Foreign currency translation losses in the first threesix months of 2010 included a write-down of approximately $2.6 million related to receivables affected by a devaluation of the Venezuelan currency.
As part of our miscellaneous income and expense in the first six months of 2010, we recorded a net pre-tax gain of $7.8 million as a result of a business combination in which Ferro Corporation and Heraeus of Hanau, Germany acquired from each other certain business lines related to decoration materials for ceramic and glass products. Also included in miscellaneous income and expense for the first half of 2010 was a charge of $3.5 million for an increased reserve for environmental remediation costs related to a non-operating facility in Brazil.
During the first quarterhalf of 2010, we recognized income tax expense of $8.6was $22.5 million, or 110%76.9% of pre-tax income. In the prior-year period,first six months of 2009, we recorded an income tax benefit of $7.8$12.1 million, or 28% of the pre-tax loss. The increase in the effective tax rate primarily resulted from not recognizing a $4.2 million benefit on losses incurred in the Netherlands and Portugal as a consequence of full valuation allowances in both jurisdictions and a $1.5 million tax charge for the elimination of future tax deductions related to Medicare Part D subsidies as a result of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed into law in the U.S. during the first quarterhalf of 2010.
Compared2010, a charge of $1.8 million for valuation allowances recorded in the current period on deferred assets in Italy, and not recognizing a $9.0 million benefit on current losses incurred in jurisdictions with the first quarter of 2009, we recorded a reduced lossfull valuation allowances.

26


Income from continuing operations was $6.8 million in the first threehalf of 2010, compared with a loss of $30.8 million during the first six months of 2010,2009. The improved income was primarily as athe result of higher gross profits,profit and the gain on a business combination related to ceramic colors, partially offset by higher restructuring charges, increased restructuring and impairment charges,income tax expense, higher SG&A expense increased interest expense, and increased income tax expense.an impairment charge.
                                
 Three months ended      Six months ended     
 March 31,      June 30,     
 2010 2009 $ Change % Change  2010 2009 $ Change % Change 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands)   
Segment Sales
  
Electronic Materials $147,233 $82,489 $64,744  78.5% $321,761 $183,059 $138,702  75.8%
Performance Coatings 128,191 108,588 19,603  18.1% 270,328 225,921 44,407  19.7%
Color and Glass Performance Materials 99,332 67,416 31,916  47.3% 197,029 143,766 53,263  37.0%
Polymer Additives 74,476 59,447 15,029  25.3% 154,140 122,445 31,695  25.9%
Specialty Plastics 38,373 34,859 3,514  10.1% 81,732 71,793 9,939  13.8%
Pharmaceuticals 5,260 5,010 250  5.0% 11,360 10,102 1,258  12.5%
              
Total segment sales $492,865 $357,809 $135,056  37.7% $1,036,350 $757,086 $279,264  36.9%
              
  
Segment Operating Income (Loss)
  
Electronic Materials $28,482 $2,417 $26,065  1,078.4% $65,879 $8,804 $57,075  648.3%
Performance Coatings 9,482  (599) 10,081 NM  23,904 5,626 18,278  324.9%
Color and Glass Performance Materials 7,283  (2,455) 9,738 NM  17,265  (232) 17,497 NM 
Polymer Additives 3,991 1,889 2,102  111.3% 6,827 3,477 3,350  96.3%
Specialty Plastics 1,819 1,462 357  24.4% 5,322 4,171 1,151  27.6%
Pharmaceuticals 125 113 12  10.6%  (146) 327  (473) NM 
              
Total segment operating income $51,182 $2,827 $48,355  1,710.5% $119,051 $22,173 $96,878  436.9%
              
 
NM — Not meaningful

19


Electronic Materials Segment Results.Sales increased in Electronic Materials in all product areas, includingled by higher sales of conductive pastes and powders. HigherIncreased sales volume contributedaccounted for approximately $38$88 million of the sales increase for the first six months of 2010. Changes in product pricing and mix contributed an additional $49 million to sales growth and changes in product mix and prices accounted for an additional $26 million in increased sales. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates contributed an additional $1accounted for $2 million to the overall sales increase.in growth. An increase in precious metal sales of $41$74 million, reflecting changes in both volume and pricing, contributed to the overall sales increase. The costs of precious metals are generally passed through to our customers with minimal gross profit contribution. Sales growth in the first half of 2010 was the result of increased in all three principal markets for our electronic material products: Asia-Pacific,sales of products shipped from the United States, Europe and Europe.Asia-Pacific. Operating income increased due to a $25$57 million increase in gross profit and a $1 million decline in SG&A expense.profit. The increase in gross profit was principally due toprimarily the result of higher sales volume.
Performance Coatings Segment Results.Sales increased in Performance Coatings primarily due toas a result of higher sales volume, as well as changes in product prices and improved product mix. Highervolume. Increased sales volume accounted forcontributed approximately $12 million of the increased in sales. Changes in product prices and mix were responsible for an additional $6$39 million of the sales increase.growth for the first six months of 2010. In addition, changes in product pricing and mix added approximately $4 million to the first six months sales growth. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates increased sales bycontributed approximately $1 million. Sales increased in all regions compared with the prior-year quarter.million to sales growth. Operating profitincome increased due to ana $24 million increase of $12 million in gross profit, driven by increased sales volume and changes in product pricing and mix. Partially offsetting the improved gross profit was an increase of $2.4$6 million in SG&A expense, compared with the prior-year quarter.period. The increase in gross profit was primarily the result of higher sales volume, increased product pricing and lower manufacturing costs, partially offset by higher raw material costs.
Color and Glass Performance Materials Segment Results.Sales increased in Color and Glass Performance Materials primarily as a result ofdue to increased sales volume.volume and changes in product pricing and mix. Increased sales volume was responsibleaccounted for approximately $20$40 million of the higher sales.sales increase in the first six months of 2010. Changes in product pricespricing and mix contributed an additional $10$13 million to the sales increase, and changes in foreign exchange rates accounted for approximately $2 million of the increase in sales.increase. Sales increased in all regions.regions compared with the prior-year period. Operating income increased due to an $11a $21 million increase in gross profit that was partially offset by a $1$4 million increase in SG&A expense. The increase in gross profit was driven byprimarily due to the positive effectsbenefits of higher sales volume.

27


Polymer Additives Segment Results.Sales increased in Polymer Additives primarily as a result of higher sales volume. Increased sales volume accounted forcontributed approximately $15$26 million to sales growth in the first half of the higher sales, offset by changes2010. Changes in product pricespricing and mix that reduced sales by approximately $1 million. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates contributed an additional $1 million to the sales increase. The sales increase$6 million. Sales growth was primarily ingenerated from the United States and Europe, the principal markets for our polymer additives products.Europe. Operating income increased due to ana $4 million increase of approximately $1 million in gross profit, primarily driven by increased sales volume and a $1 millionmanufacturing cost reduction in SG&A expense, compared to the prior-year quarter.initiatives. The increase in gross profit was primarily the result oflargely due to higher sales volumes and increased sales volume, and the lower SG&A expense was drivenproduct pricing, partially offset by staffing reductions accomplished in prior periods.higher raw material costs.
Specialty Plastics Segment Results.Sales increased in Specialty Plastics primarily due toas a result of increased sales volume.volume as well as changes in product pricing and mix. Increased sales volume accounted for approximately $2$5 million in increasedof the sales increase and changes in foreign currency exchange rates were responsible for an additional $1 million in sales. Changes in product mixpricing and pricesmix contributed an additional $1$5 million to the increased sales.overall sales growth. Sales increasedgrowth was the strongest in the United States, and Europe.with additional growth from sales in Europe, compared with the prior-year period. Operating income increased primarily as a result of a $1 million reduction inlower SG&A expense, partially offset by a $0.6 million decline in gross profit. The reduction in SG&A expense wasexpenses driven by reduced staffing.expense-reduction initiatives in prior periods.
Pharmaceuticals Segment Results.Sales were nearly unchangedincreased in Pharmaceuticals.Pharmaceuticals as a result of changes in product mix. Operating profit also was nearly unchanged forincome declined primarily as the quarter.result of higher SG&A expense.
                                
 Three months ended      Six months ended     
 March 31,      June 30,     
 2010 2009 $ Change % Change  2010 2009 $ Change % Change 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands)   
Geographic Revenues
  
United States $240,487 $170,054 $70,433  41.4% $517,490 $351,017 $166,473  47.4%
International 252,378 187,755 64,623  34.4% 518,860 406,069 112,791  27.8%
              
Total $492,865 $357,809 $135,056  37.7% $1,036,350 $757,086 $279,264  36.9%
              
Sales of products fromincreased in all regions increased during the first threesix months of 2010 as customer demand improved fromcompared with the depressed levels recorded in the first quarter of 2009. In the 2010 first quarter, sales inprior-year period. Sales were nearly evenly split between the United States were 49% of total sales, compared with 48% in the first quarter of 2009.and international locations. The increase in international sales was driven by higher sales in Europe, Asia-Pacific and Latin America.the Europe-Middle East-North Africa region. Sales in Asia-Pacificthe United States grew at the fastest rate.rate during the first six months of 2010. Sales recorded in each region include products exported to customers that are located in other regions.

20


Summary of Cash Flows for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2010 and 2009
                                
 Three months ended      Six months ended     
 March 31,      June 30,     
 2010 2009 $ Change % Change  2010 2009 $ Change % Change 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands)   
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities $7,604 $(77,539) $85,143  (109.8%) $91,772 $(40,486) $132,258  (326.7%)
Net cash used for investing activities  (8,154)  (2,576)  (5,578)  216.5%  (10,094)  (22,897) 12,803  (55.9%)
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities  (194) 85,201  (85,395)  (100.2%)  (69,843) 69,449  (139,292)  (200.6%)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents  (69)  (206) 137  (66.5%)  (610) 1,235  (1,845)  (149.4%)
              
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents $(813) $4,880 $(5,693)  (116.7%)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents $11,225 $7,301 $3,924  53.7%
              
Details of net cash provided by (used for) operating activities for the six months ended June 30 were as follows:
         
  2010  2009 
  (Dollars in thousands) 
Cash flows from operating activities
        
Net income (loss) $6,782  $(31,159)
Depreciation and amortization  41,251   41,353 
Precious metals deposits  56,626   (80,426)
Accounts and trade notes receivable  (55,751)  3,743 
Inventories  (26,853)  75,512 
Accounts payable  27,142   (37,894)
Other changes in current assets and liabilities, net  16,895   (15,781)
Other adjustments, net  25,680   4,527 
       
Net cash provided by (used for) continuing operations  91,772   (40,125)
Net cash used for discontinued operations     (361)
       
Net cash provided by (used for) operating activities $91,772  $(40,486)
       

28


Cash flows from operating activities increased by $85.1$132.3 million in the first threesix months of 2010 compared with the prior-year period. Year-over-year cash flows from operating activities increased $92.2$137.1 million due to changes in precious metal deposits, $65.0 million due to changes in accounts payable, $71.0 million primarily due to funding requirements in 2009 for precious metal deposits, and $19.2$37.9 million due to higher net income. Partially offsetting these effects, year-over-year cash flows from operating activities decreased $65.0$102.4 million due to changes in inventories and $56.1$59.5 million due to changes in accounts and trade notes receivable. Accounts payable, inventories, and accounts and trade notes receivable increased in the first threesix months of 2010 in response to improved customer demand as worldwide markets continued to recover from the economic downturn in 2009.
Cash flows from investing activities decreased $5.6increased $12.8 million in the first threesix months of 2010 compared with the prior-year period. Capital expenditures increaseddecreased to $8.6$16.3 million in the first quarterhalf of 2010 from $2.6$23.0 million in the first quarterhalf of 2009, when capital spending was tightly controlled due to2009. In the economic downturn.first half of 2010, we had net proceeds of $5.9 million in connection with our business combination with Heraeus.
Cash flows from financing activities decreased $85.4$139.3 million in the first threesix months of 2010 compared with the prior-year period. In the first quarterhalf of 2009, borrowings2010, net repayments under our revolving credit facilityfacilities increased by $92.7$147.8 million, while in the first half of 2009, debt issuance costs related to a new asset securitization facility and an amendment of our revolving credit and term loan facility were $8.1$9.4 million.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
International Receivable Sales Programs.We maintain several international programs to sell trade accounts receivable to financial institutions. Ferro had received net proceeds under the international programs of $8.7$2.6 million at March 31,June 30, 2010, and $10.3 million at December 31, 2009, for outstanding receivables.
Liquidity Requirements
Our liquidity requirements primarily include debt service, purchase commitments, labor costs, working capital requirements, restructuring expenditures, capital investments, precious metals cash collateral requirements, and postretirement obligations. We expect to meet these requirements in the long term through cash provided by operating activities and availability under replacement credit facilities or other financing arrangements. Cash flows from operating activities are primarily driven by earnings before noncash charges and changes in working capital needs. In the first quarterhalf of 2010, cash flows from operating activities were generally sufficient to fund our investing activities, primarily capital expenditures for property plant and equipment. We had $224.5borrowing capacity of $258.1 million at March 31,June 30, 2010, and $202.4 million at December 31, 2009, available under various credit facilities, primarily our revolving credit facility. To enhance liquidity, we have taken actions that include a variety of restructuring activities and suspension of dividend payments on our common stock.

21


Our level of debt, debt service requirements, and ability to access credit markets could have important consequences to our business operations and uses of cash flows. The credit shortage in the global capital markets has not prohibited us from accessing the capital markets, but it has increased our cost of borrowing.markets. We issued the 6.50% Convertible Senior Notes in the third quarter of 2008, amended our Revolving Credit and Term Loan Facility in the first and fourth quarters of 2009, replaced our expiring asset securitization facility in the second quarter of 2009 and extended its maturity in the second quarter of 2010, sold 41 million shares of common stock in the fourth quarter of 2009.2009, and made an early principal payment of $50 million on our term loans in the second quarter of 2010. In addition, financial market conditions and access to credit hashave improved over the last several quarters, evidenced by the number of financing transactions consummated in the credit markets and the pricing of these offerings.
We may from time to time seek to retire or repurchase our outstanding debt through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

29


Recent difficulties
Difficulties experienced in global capital markets could affect the ability or willingness of counterparties to perform under our various lines of credit, receivable sales programs, forward contracts, and precious metal lease programs. These counterparties are major, reputable, multinational institutions, all having investment-grade credit ratings, except for one, which is not rated. Accordingly, we do not anticipate counterparty default. However, an interruption in access to external financing could adversely affect our business prospects and financial condition.
We assess on an ongoing basis our portfolio of businesses, as well as our financial and capital structure, to ensure that we have sufficient capital and liquidity to meet our strategic objectives. As part of this process, from time to time we evaluate the possible divestiture of businesses that are not critical to our core strategic objectives and, where appropriate, pursue the sale of such businesses. We also evaluate and pursue acquisition opportunities that we believe will enhance our strategic position. We generallyGenerally, we publicly announce publicly divestiture and acquisition transactions only when we have entered into definitive agreements relating to those transactions.
Critical Accounting Policies and Their Application
There are no material changes to our critical accounting policies described in “Critical Accounting Policies” within Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13,Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, (“ASU 2009-13”), which is codified in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition. This pronouncement applies to all deliverables in contractual arrangements in which a vendor will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. In April 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2009-13 is2010-17,Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method, (“ASU 2010-17”), which defines a milestone and determines when it may be appropriate to apply the milestone method of revenue recognition for research or development transactions. These pronouncements are codified in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and are effective for our fiscal year that begins January 1, 2011. ASU 2009-13These pronouncements may be applied prospectively or retrospectively, and early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact that adoption of ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2010-17 may have on our consolidated financial statements.
Risk Factors
Certain statements contained here and in future filings with the SEC reflect the Company’s expectations with respect to future performance and constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are subject to a variety of uncertainties, unknown risks and other factors concerning the Company’s operations and business environment, which are difficult to predict and are beyond the control of the Company. Factors that could adversely affect our future financial performance are described under the heading “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

 

2230


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The primary objective of the following information is to provide forward-looking quantitative and qualitative information about our exposure to instruments that are sensitive to fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates, and costs of raw materials and energy.rates.
Our exposure to interest rate risk arises from our debt portfolio. We manage this risk by controlling the mix of fixed versus variable-rate debt after considering the interest rate environment and expected future cash flows. To reduce our exposure to interest rate changes on variable-rate debt, we entered into interest rate swap agreements. These swaps effectively convert a portion of our variable-rate debt to a fixed rate. Our objective is to limit variability in earnings, cash flows and overall borrowing costs caused by changes in interest rates, while preserving operating flexibility.
We operate internationally and enter into transactions denominated in foreign currencies. These transactions expose us to gains and losses arising from exchange rate movements between the dates foreign currencies are recorded and the dates they are settled. We manage this risk by entering into forward currency contracts that offset these gains and losses.
The notional amounts, net carrying amounts of assets (liabilities), and fair values associated with our exposure to these market risks and sensitivity analyses about potential gains (losses) resulting from hypothetical changes in market rates are presented below:
                
 March 31, December 31,  June 30, December 31, 
 2010 2009  2010 2009 
 (Dollars in thousands)  (Dollars in thousands) 
Variable-rate debt and utilization of accounts receivable sales programs:  
Change in annual interest expense from 1% change in interest rates $1,150 $1,170  $383 $1,170 
Fixed-rate debt:  
Carrying amount 161,200 161,050  161,784 161,050 
Fair value 171,136 160,275  166,864 160,275 
Change in fair value from 1% increase in interest rate  (4,922)  (4,814)  (4,468)  (4,814)
Change in fair value from 1% decrease in interest rate 5,104 5,000  4,621 5,000 
Interest rate swaps:  
Notional amount 150,000 150,000  150,000 150,000 
Carrying amount and fair value  (8,393)  (9,516)  (6,527)  (9,516)
Change in fair value from 1% increase in interest rate 1,878 2,226  1,501 2,226 
Change in fair value from 1% decrease in interest rate  (1,905)  (2,263)  (1,520)  (2,263)
Foreign currency forward contracts:  
Notional amount 200,139 178,922  170,361 178,922 
Carrying amount and fair value 1,410 723  4,079 723 
Change in fair value from 10% appreciation of U.S. dollar 7,202 5,571  5,037 5,571 
Change in fair value from 10% depreciation of U.S. dollar  (8,802)  (6,809)  (6,157)  (6,809)

 

2331


Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Item 4.Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Ferro is committed to maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in its Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, Ferro has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures. The evaluation examined those disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31,June 30, 2010, the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31,June 30, 2010.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the firstsecond quarter of 2010, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

2432


PART II — OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Item 1.Legal Proceedings
As previously disclosed, on May 6, 2004, the Company was named in an indirect purchaser class action in California seeking monetary damages and injunctive relief relating to alleged violations of the antitrust laws by the Company and others participating in the plastics additives industry (Competition Collision Center, LLC v. Crompton Corporation, et al., Superior Court of the State of California for the City and County of San Francisco, Case No. CGC-040431278); on August 4, 2005, the Company was named in another indirect purchaser class action lawsuit (In Re Indirect Purchaser, Plastic Additives Litigation, D.R. Ward Construction, et al., v. Rohm & Haas Company, et al., Case No. 2:05-CV-04157-LDD, MDL No. 1684, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Pennsylvania); and in June 2008, the Company was named in four more indirect purchaser class action lawsuits. All of these cases contain similar allegations. The four indirect purchaser cases filed in 2008 have been transferred to the Eastern District of Pennsylvania (Defren v. Rohm & Haas Company, et al., Case No. 2:08-CV-03702-LDD (filed June 12, 2008); Zebrowski v. Rohm & Haas Company, et al., Case No. 2:08-CV-04161-LDD (filed June 23, 2008); Burg v. Rohm & Haas Company, et al., Case No. 2:08-CV-04162-LDD (filed June 30, 2008); Miller v. Rohm & Haas Company, et al., Case No. 2:08-CV-03701-LDD (filed June 18, 2008)). The Company intends to vigorously defend these six civil actions, which are all in their early stages. As a result, the Company cannot determine the outcome of these lawsuits at this time.
As previously disclosed, for the year ended December 31, 2007, the Company submitted deviation reports required by the Title V air emission permit issued under the New Jersey Air Pollution Control Act (the “Title V Air Permit”), which contained numerous deviations from the standards required by the Title V Air Permit at our South Plainfield, New Jersey, facility. In November 2009, the Company entered a settlement agreement with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, pursuant to which the Company performed $100,000 worth of supplemental environmental projects in the community during 2009 and will make quarterly cash payments totaling $300,000 in 2010.
There are various other lawsuits and claims pending against the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries. We do not currently expect the ultimate liabilities, if any, and expenses related to such lawsuits and claims to materially affect the consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows of the Company.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Item 1A.Risk Factors
There were no material changes to the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
As previously disclosed, our senior credit facility prohibits us from paying dividends on our common stock.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. (Removed and Reserved)
Item 4.(Removed and Reserved)
Item 5. Other Information
Item 5.Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
Item 6.Exhibits
The exhibits listed in the attached Exhibit Index are the exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

 

2533


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
     



Date: July 26, 2010 

FERRO CORPORATION
(Registrant)

 
 
Date: April 27, 2010 
/s/ James F. Kirsch   
 James F. Kirsch  
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
 
   
Date: April 27,July 26, 2010   
 /s/ Sallie B. BaileyThomas R. Miklich   
 Sallie B. BaileyThomas R. Miklich  
 Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) 
 

 

2634


     
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following exhibits are filed with this report or are incorporated here by reference to a prior filing in accordance with Rule 12b-32 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
Exhibit:
     
 3  Articles of incorporation and by-laws
     
 3.1  Eleventh Amended Articles of Incorporation. (Reference is made to Exhibit 4.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 5, 2008, which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.)
     
 3.2  Certificate of Amendment to the Eleventh Amended Articles of Incorporation of Ferro Corporation filed with the Ohio Secretary of State on December 29, 1994. (Reference is made to Exhibit 4.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 5, 2008, which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.)
     
 3.3  Certificate of Amendment to the Eleventh Amended Articles of Incorporation of Ferro Corporation filed with the Ohio Secretary of State on June 23, 1998. (Reference is made to Exhibit 4.3 to Ferro Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 5, 2008, which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.)
     
 3.4  Ferro Corporation Code of Regulations. (Reference is made to Exhibit 4.4 to Ferro Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 5, 2008, which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.)
     
 4  Instruments defining rights of security holders, including indentures
     
 4.1  Senior Indenture, dated as of March 5, 2008, by and between Ferro Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association. (Reference is made to Exhibit 4.5 to Ferro Corporation’s Registration Statement on Form S-3, filed March 5, 2008, which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.)
     
 4.2  First Supplemental Indenture, dated August 19, 2008, by and between Ferro Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association (with Form of 6.50% Convertible Senior Note due 2013). (Reference is made to Exhibit 4.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 19, 2008, which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.)
     
    The Company agrees, upon request, to furnish to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission a copy of any instrument authorizing long-term debt that does not authorize debt in excess of 10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
     
 10.1Amendment No. 1, dated as of February 4, 2010, to Receivables Purchase Agreement among Ferro Finance Corporation, Ferro Corporation, certain purchasers from time to time party thereto and Wachovia Bank, National Association.
10.2Amendment No. 2, dated as of May 1, 2010, to Receivables Purchase Agreement among Ferro Finance Corporation, Ferro Corporation, certain purchasers from time to time party thereto and Wachovia Bank, National Association. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.2 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 2, 2010, which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.)
10.3Amendment No. 3, dated June 1, 2010, to Receivables Purchase Agreement among Ferro Finance Corporation, Ferro Corporation, certain purchasers from time to time party thereto and Wachovia Bank, National Association. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 2, 2010, which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.)

35


10.4Ferro Corporation 2010 Long-Term Incentive Plan. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 6, 2010, which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.)
10.5Ferro Corporation Executive Separation Policy. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro Corporation’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 28, 2010, which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.)
31.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
     
 31.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a).
     
 32.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350.
     
 32.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350.

 

2736