UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q



(Mark One)

~~(Mark One)~~
þ x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the quarterly period ended ~~July 30, 2010~~April 29, 2011
Or OR
o
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to .

Commission ~~File Number:~~file number: 0-17017

Dell Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		74-2487834
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

One Dell Way,

Round Rock, Texas 78682

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

1-800-BUY-DELL

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~registrant~~registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þR No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 ofRegulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þR No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” inRule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer þR		Accelerated filer o
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined inRule 12b-2 of the ~~Exchange~~ Act). Yes o No þR

As of the close of business on ~~August 20, 2010, 1,944,708,225~~May 19, 2011, 1,887,169,853 shares of common stock, par value $.01 per share, were outstanding.

Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report includes “forward-looking statements.” The words “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” ~~“aim”~~“aim,” “seek” and similar expressions as they relate to us or our management are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. All statements by us regarding our expected financial position, revenues, cash flows and other operating results, business strategy, legal proceedings and similar matters are forward-looking statements. Our expectations expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements may not turn out to be correct. Our results could be materially different from our expectations because of various risks, including the risks discussed in “Part I —- Item 1A —- Risk ~~Factors”~~Factors" of our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended January ~~29, 2010 and in our subsequently filed SEC reports.~~28, 2011. Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date onas of which such statement is made, and, except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances, including unanticipated events, after the date as of which such statement iswas made.

~~INDEX~~

Table of Contents


		~~Page~~

~~PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~
				Page
*~~Item 1. Financial Statements~~*PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1.		Financial Statements
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position at ~~July 30, 2010~~April 29, 2011 (unaudited), and January ~~29, 2010~~28, 2011				1

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011(unaudited) and April 30, 2010 (unaudited)~~, and July 31, 2009 (unaudited)~~				2

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011 (unaudited) and April 30, 2010 (unaudited)~~, and July 31, 2009 (unaudited)~~				3

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)				4
	Item 2.
*~~Item 2. Management’s~~Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations*			29	27
	Item 3.
*~~Item 3.~~ Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk*	43
	43 Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	44
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

*Item ~~4. Controls and Procedures~~*1.	Legal Proceedings		43	45
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	45
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	45
	Item 6.	Exhibits	46

	Signatures		46
	Exhibit Index		47
~~PART II - OTHER INFORMATION~~
		Exhibits
	*~~Item 1. Legal Proceedings~~*EX-3.1			45

*~~Item 1A. Risk Factors~~*EX-12.1			45

*~~Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~* EX-31.1			46
	EX-31.2
				EX-32.1
	*~~Item 6. Exhibits~~*EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
				46	EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
	~~EX-3.1~~EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
	~~EX-3.2~~EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
	~~EX-12.1~~EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
	~~EX-31.1~~EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
~~EX-31.2~~
~~EX-32.1~~

Table of Contents

PART I

ITEM 1 — FINANCIAL ~~INFORMATION~~STATEMENTS


*~~ITEM 1.~~*	*~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~*

DELL INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

(in millions)

July 30,
January 29,
2010 2010
(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 11,694 $ 10,635
Short-term investments 744 373
Accounts receivable, net 6,565 5,837
Financing receivables, net 3,272 2,706
Inventories, net 1,372 1,051
Other current assets 3,562 3,643

Total current assets 27,209 24,245
Property, plant, and equipment, net 1,980 2,181
Investments 633 781
Long-term financing receivables, net 622 332
Goodwill 4,264 4,074
Purchased intangible assets, net 1,638 1,694
Other non-current assets 294 345

Total assets $ 36,640 $ 33,652

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt $ 1,627 $ 663
Accounts payable 12,465 11,373
Accrued and other 3,812 3,884
Short-term deferred services revenue 3,009 3,040

Total current liabilities 20,913 18,960
Long-term debt 3,623 3,417
Long-term deferred services revenue 3,311 3,029
Other non-current liabilities 2,632 2,605

Total liabilities 30,479 28,011

Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock and capital in excess of $.01 par value; shares authorized: 7,000; shares issued: 3,365 and 3,351, respectively;
shares outstanding: 1,945 and 1,957, respectively 11,608 11,472
Treasury stock at cost: 945 shares and 919 shares, respectively (28,304 ) (27,904 )
Retained earnings 22,984 22,110
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (127 ) (37 )

Total stockholders’ equity 6,161 5,641

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 36,640 $ 33,652



	April 29, 2011			January 28, 2011
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,061		$	13,913
Short-term investments	418			452
Accounts receivable, net	6,196			6,493
Short-term financing receivables, net	3,205			3,643
Inventories, net	1,276			1,301
Other current assets	3,217			3,219
Total current assets	28,373			29,021
Property, plant, and equipment, net	1,987			1,953
Investments	762			704
Long-term financing receivables, net	1,123			799
Goodwill	5,406			4,365
Purchased intangible assets, net	1,941			1,495
Other non-current assets	196			262
Total assets	$	39,788		$	38,599

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Short-term debt	$	816		$	851
Accounts payable	10,442			11,293
Accrued and other	3,590			4,181
Short-term deferred services revenue	3,282			3,158
Total current liabilities	18,130			19,483
Long-term debt	6,794			5,146
Long-term deferred services revenue	3,608			3,518
Other non-current liabilities	2,886			2,686
Total liabilities	31,418			30,833
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock and capital in excess of $.01 par value; shares authorized: 7,000; shares issued: 3,381 and 3,369, respectively; shares outstanding: 1,899 and 1,918, respectively	11,900			11,797
Treasury stock at cost: 1,007 and 976 shares, respectively	(29,154		)	(28,704		)
Retained earnings	25,689			24,744
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	(65		)	(71		)
Total stockholders’ equity	8,370			7,766
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	39,788		$	38,599

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in millions, except per share amounts; unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011			April 30, 2010
Net revenue:
Products	$	12,059		$	12,086
Services, including software related	2,958			2,788
Total net revenue	15,017			14,874
Cost of net revenue:
Products	9,436			10,385
Services, including software related	2,149			1,973
Total cost of net revenue	11,585			12,358
Gross margin	3,432			2,516
Operating expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative	2,025			1,830
Research, development, and engineering	195			167
Total operating expenses	2,220			1,997
Operating income	1,212			519
Interest and other, net	(42		)	(68		)
Income before income taxes	1,170			451
Income tax provision	225			110
Net income	$	945		$	341
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.50		$	0.17
Diluted	$	0.49		$	0.17
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic	1,908			1,961
Diluted	1,923			1,973

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in millions; unaudited)



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011			April 30, 2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	945		$	341
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	216			247
Stock-based compensation	99			76
Effects of exchange rate changes on monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies	—			30
Deferred income taxes	(63		)	(31		)
Provision for doubtful accounts — including financing receivables	47			122
Other	(5		)	—
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
Accounts receivable	471			(119		)
Financing receivables	21			(208		)
Inventories	38			(132		)
Other assets	110			69
Accounts payable	(925		)	22
Deferred services revenue	191			72
Accrued and other liabilities	(680		)	(251		)
Change in cash from operating activities	465			238
Cash flows from investing activities:
Investments:
Purchases	(240		)	(350		)
Maturities and sales	222			169
Capital expenditures	(137		)	(46		)
Proceeds from sale of facility and land	12			—
Collections on purchased financing receivables	67			—
Acquisitions, net of cash received	(1,473		)	(133		)
Change in cash from investing activities	(1,549		)	(360		)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repurchase of common stock	(450		)	(200		)
Issuance of common stock under employee plans	10			7
Issuance of commercial paper (maturity 90 days or less), net	—			234
Proceeds from debt	1,930			268
Repayments of debt	(323		)	(566		)
Other	3			3
Change in cash from financing activities	1,170			(254		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	62			(4		)
Change in cash and cash equivalents	148			(380		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of the period	13,913			10,635
Cash and cash equivalents at end of the period	$	14,061		$	10,255

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME~~

~~(in millions, except per share amounts; unaudited)~~

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30,
July 31,
July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009
Net revenue:
Products $ 12,645 $ 10,623 $ 24,731 $ 20,855
Services, including software related 2,889 2,141 5,677 4,251

Total net revenue 15,534 12,764 30,408 25,106

Cost of net revenue:
Products 10,931 8,978 21,316 17,764
Services, including software related 2,017 1,395 3,990 2,783

Total cost of net revenue 12,948 10,373 25,306 20,547

Gross margin 2,586 2,391 5,102 4,559

Operating expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative 1,679 1,571 3,509 3,184
Research, development, and engineering 162 149 329 290

Total operating expenses 1,841 1,720 3,838 3,474

Operating income 745 671 1,264 1,085

Interest and other, net (49 ) (42 ) (117 ) (44 )

Income before income taxes 696 629 1,147 1,041

Income tax provision 151 157 261 279

Net income $ 545 $ 472 $ 886 $ 762

Earnings per share:
Basic $ 0.28 $ 0.24 $ 0.45 $ 0.39

Diluted $ 0.28 $ 0.24 $ 0.45 $ 0.39

Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic 1,952 1,955 1,956 1,952
Diluted 1,960 1,960 1,967 1,956

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

~~DELL INC.~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS~~

~~(in millions; unaudited)~~

Six Months Ended
July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income $ 886 $ 762
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 511 402
Stock-based compensation 156 146
Effects of exchange rate changes on monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies 37 26
Deferred income taxes (55 ) (140 )
Provision for doubtful accounts - including financing receivables 217 210
Other 4 19
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects from acquisitions:
Accounts receivable (896 ) (593 )
Financing receivables (413 ) (379 )
Inventories (318 ) 29
Other assets 36 (24 )
Accounts payable 1,131 1,318
Deferred services revenue 265 44
Accrued and other liabilities 12 17

Change in cash from operating activities 1,573 1,837

Cash flows from investing activities:
Investments:
Purchases (1,063 ) (776 )
Maturities and sales 838 982
Capital expenditures (191 ) (179 )
Proceeds from sale of facility and land 18 16
Acquisition of business, net of cash received (222 ) (3 )

Change in cash from investing activities (620 ) 40

Cash flows from financing activities:
Repurchase of common stock (400 ) -
Issuance of common stock under employee plans 9 -
Issuance (repayment) of commercial paper (maturity 90 days or less), net 724 (100 )
Proceeds from debt 609 1,491
Repayments of debt (819 ) (12 )
Other 2 -

Change in cash from financing activities 125 1,379

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents (19 ) 91

Change in cash and cash equivalents 1,059 3,347
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 10,635 8,352

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 11,694 $ 11,699

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

~~DELL INC.~~

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 — BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Basis of Presentation —

The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of Dell Inc. (individually and together with its consolidated subsidiaries, ~~“Dell”~~"Dell") should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying Notes filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission ~~(“SEC”~~("SEC") in ~~Dell’s~~Dell's Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended January ~~29, 2010.~~28, 2011 ("Fiscal 2011"). The accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ~~(“GAAP”~~("GAAP"). In the opinion of management, the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to fairly state the financial position of Dell and its consolidated subsidiaries at ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011, the results of its operations, ~~for the three and six months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009,~~ and its cash flows for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011, and April 30, ~~2010, and July 31, 2009.~~

2010.

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in ~~Dell’s~~Dell's Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates. The results of operations for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011, and April 30, 2010, and ~~July 31, 2009, and its~~the cash flows for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011, and April 30, 2010, ~~and July 31, 2009,~~ are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full ~~year.~~fiscal year or for any other fiscal period.

Dell's fiscal year is the 52 or 53 week period ending on the Friday nearest January 31. The fiscal year ending February 3, 2012 ("Fiscal 2012") will be a 53 week period.

Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

~~Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables —~~In September 2009, the Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) reached consensus on two issues which affects the timing of revenue recognition. The first consensus changes the level of evidence of standalone selling price required to separate deliverables in a multiple deliverable revenue arrangement by allowing a company to make its best estimate of the selling price (“ESP”) of deliverables when more objective evidence of selling price is not available and eliminates the use of the residual method. The consensus applies to multiple deliverable revenue arrangements that are not accounted for under other accounting pronouncements and retains the use of vendor specific objective evidence of selling price (“VSOE”) if available and third-party evidence of selling price (“TPE”), when VSOE is unavailable. The second consensus excludes sales of tangible products that contain essential software elements, that is, software enabled devices, from the scope of revenue recognition requirements for software arrangements. Dell elected to early adopt this accounting guidance at the beginning of the first quarter of Fiscal 2011 on a prospective basis for applicable transactions originating or materially modified after January 29, 2010.

Dell’s multiple deliverable arrangements generally include hardware products that are sold with services such as extended warranty services, installation, maintenance, and other services contracts. The nature and terms of these multiple deliverable arrangements will vary based on the customized needs of Dell’s customers. Maintenance, support, and other services are generally delivered according to the terms of the arrangement after the initial sale of hardware or software. Dell’s service contracts may include a combination of services arrangements including deployment, asset recovery, recycling, IT outsourcing, consulting, applications development, applications maintenance, and business process services. These service contracts may include provisions for cancellation, termination, refunds, or service level adjustments. These contract provisions would not have a significant impact on recognized revenue as Dell generally recognizes revenue for these contracts as the services are performed.

The adoption of the new guidance on multiple deliverable arrangements did not change the manner in which Dell accounts for its multiple deliverable arrangements as Dell did not use the residual method for the majority of its offerings and its services offerings are generally sold on a standalone basis where evidence of selling price is available. Most of Dell’s products and services qualify as separate units of accounting. Prior to the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell allocated revenue from multiple-element arrangements to the multiple elements based on the relative fair value of each element, which was generally based on the relative sales price of each element when sold separately. Because selling price is generally available based on standalone sales, Dell has limited application of

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

TPE, as determined by comparison of pricing for products and services to the pricing of similar products and services as offered by Dell or its competitors in standalone sales to similarly situated customers. Thus, the adoption of this consensus had no impact on Dell’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the first and second quarters of Fiscal 2011, or the year ended January 29, 2010.

Pursuant to the new guidance on revenue recognition for software enabled products, certain Dell storage products are no longer included in the scope of the software revenue recognition guidance. Prior to the new guidance, Dell established fair value for Post Contract Customer Support (“PCS”) for these products, based on VSOE and used the residual method to allocate revenue to the delivered elements. Under the new guidance, the revenue for what was previously deemed PCS is now considered part of a multiple element arrangement. As such, any discount is allocated to all elements based on the relative selling price of both delivered and undelivered elements. The impact of applying this consensus was not material to Dell’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the first and second quarters of Fiscal 2011, or the year ended January 29, 2010.

~~As new products are introduced in future periods, Dell may be required to use TPE or ESP, depending on the specific facts at the time.~~

~~Variable Interest Entities and Transfers of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities~~ — The pronouncement on transfers of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities removes the concept of a qualifying special-purpose entity and removes the exception from applying variable interest entity accounting to qualifying special-purpose entities. The pronouncement on variable interest entities requires an entity to perform an ongoing analysis to determine whether the entity’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. The pronouncements were effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2009. Dell adopted the pronouncements at the beginning of the first quarter of Fiscal 2011. The adoption of these two pronouncements resulted in Dell’s consolidation of its two qualifying special purpose entities. See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the impact of the consolidation.

~~Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements~~

Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses— In July 2010, ~~FASB~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued a new pronouncement that requires enhanced disclosures regarding the nature of credit risk inherent in an ~~entity’s~~entity's portfolio of financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed, and the changes and reasons for those changes in the allowance for credit losses. The new disclosures ~~will~~ require information for both the financing receivables and the related allowance for credit losses at more disaggregated levels. Disclosures related to information as of the end of a reporting period ~~will become~~became effective for Dell in ~~the fourth quarter of~~ Fiscal 2011. Specific disclosures regarding activities that occur during a reporting period ~~such as the disaggregated rollforward disclosures, will be~~are now required for Dell beginning in the first quarter of ~~Fiscal~~the fiscal year ending February 3, 2012. As these changes relate only ~~relate~~ to disclosures, they ~~will~~did not have an impact on ~~Dell’s~~Dell's consolidated financial results. See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information on Dell's disclosures relating to the credit quality of its financing receivables.

~~Reclassifications~~

NOTE 2 — ~~To maintain comparability among the periods presented, Dell has revised the presentation~~INVENTORIES



	April 29, 2011		January 28, 2011
	(in millions)
Inventories:
Production materials	$	731	$	593
Work-in-process	171		232
Finished goods	374		476
Total	$	1,276	$	1,301

Table of certain prior period amounts reported within cash flows from operating activities presented in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The revision had no impact on the total change in cash from operating activities.Contents

DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

~~NOTE 2 — INVENTORIES~~

July 30,
January 29,
2010 2010
(in millions)
Inventories:

Production materials $ 673 $ 487
Work-in-process 199 168
Finished goods 500 396

Inventories $ 1,372 $ 1,051

NOTE 3 — FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The following table presents ~~Dell’s~~Dell's hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011, and January ~~29, 2010:~~28, 2011:

July 30, 2010 January 29, 2010
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Quoted
Quoted

Prices
Prices

in Active
Significant
in Active
Significant

Markets for
Other
Significant
Markets for
Other
Significant

Identical
Observable
Unobservable
Identical
Observable
Unobservable

Assets Inputs Inputs Assets Inputs Inputs
(in millions)
Assets:

Cash equivalents:

Commercial paper $ - $ 549 $ - $ 549 $ - $ 197 $ - $ 197
U.S. government and agencies - 82 - 82 - - - -
Debt securities:
U.S. government and agencies - 55 - 55 - 66 - 66
U.S. corporate - 545 31 576 - 553 30 583
International corporate - 630 - 630 - 391 - 391
State and municipal governments - - - - - 2 - 2
Equity and other securities - 96 - 96 - 90 - 90
Retained interest - - - - - - 151 151
Derivative instruments - 120 - 120 - 96 - 96

Total assets $ - $ 2,077 $ 31 $ 2,108 $ - $ 1,395 $ 181 $ 1,576

Liabilities:

Derivative instruments $ - $ 37 $ - $ 37 $ - $ 12 $ - $ 12

Total liabilities $ - $ 37 $ - $ 37 $ - $ 12 $ - $ 12

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~



	April 29, 2011								January 28, 2011
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs				Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
							(in millions)
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Money market funds	$	9,579	$	—	$	—	$	9,579	$	6,261	$	—	$	—	$	6,261
Commercial paper	—		1,390		—		1,390		—		2,945		—		2,945
U.S. government and agencies	—		16		—		16		—		1,699		—		1,699
Debt Securities:
U.S. government and agencies	—		27		—		27		—		79		—		79
U.S. corporate	—		524		34		558		—		464		32		496
International corporate	—		466		—		466		—		457		—		457
Equity and other securities	—		113		—		113		—		109		—		109
Derivative instruments	—		60		—		60		—		27		—		27
Total assets	$	9,579	$	2,596	$	34	$	12,209	$	6,261	$	5,780	$	32	$	12,073
Liabilities:
Derivative instruments	$	—	$	159	$	—	$	159	$	—	$	28	$	—	$	28
Total liabilities	$	—	$	159	$	—	$	159	$	—	$	28	$	—	$	28

The following section describes the valuation methodologies Dell uses to measure financial instruments at fair value:

Cash Equivalents — - The majority of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's cash equivalents in the above table consists of money market funds, commercial paper, including corporate and asset-backed commercial paper, and U.S. government and agencies, all with original maturities of less than ~~ninety~~90 days and ~~are~~ valued at fair value which approximates cost. The ~~valuation is~~valuations of these securities are based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets, when available, or pricing models whereby all significant inputs are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data. When quoted prices are not available, Dell utilizes a pricing service to assist in obtaining fair value ~~pricing for the majority of this investment portfolio.~~pricing. Dell conducts reviews on a quarterly basis to verify pricing, assess liquidity, and determine if significant inputs have changed that would impact the fair value hierarchy disclosure.

Debt Securities — - The majority of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's debt securities consists of various fixed income securities such as U.S. government and agencies, and U.S. and international ~~corporate, and state and municipal bonds. This portfolio~~corporate. Dell utilizes a pricing service to assist management in measuring fair value pricing for the majority of ~~investments~~this investment portfolio. Valuation is ~~valued~~ based on ~~model driven valuations~~pricing models whereby all significant inputs, including benchmark yields, reported trades, broker-dealer quotes, issue spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers and other market related data,are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset. ~~Dell utilizes a pricing service to assist management in obtaining fair value pricing for the majority of this investment portfolio. Pricing for securities is based on proprietary models, and inputs~~Inputs are documented in accordance with the fair value measurements hierarchy. Dell conducts reviews on a quarterly basis to verify pricing, assess liquidity, and determine if significant valuation inputs have changed that would impact the fair value hierarchy disclosure. The Level 3 position as of ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011, and January ~~29, 2010,~~28, 2011, represents a convertible debt security that Dell was unable to corroborate with observable market data. The investment is valued at cost plus accrued interest as this is ~~management’s~~management's best estimate of fair value.

Equity and Other Securities — -The majority of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's investments in equity and other securities consists of various mutual funds held in ~~Dell’s~~Dell's Deferred Compensation Plan. The valuation of these securities is based on pricing models whereby all significant inputs are observable or can be derived from or corroborated by observable market data.

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

~~Retained Interest~~ — The fair value of the retained interest was determined using a discounted cash flow model. Significant assumptions to the model include pool credit losses, payment rates, and discount rates. These assumptions are supported by both historical experience and anticipated trends relative to the particular receivable pool. Retained interest in securitized receivables was included in financing receivables, short-term and long-term, on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell consolidated its previously unconsolidated special purpose entities and as result, the retained interest as of January 29, 2010, was eliminated. See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about the consolidation of Dell’s previously unconsolidated special purpose entities.NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

Derivative Instruments ~~— Dell’s~~ - Dell's derivative financial instruments consist primarily of foreign currency forward and purchased option contracts, and interest rate swaps. The fair value of the portfolio is ~~valued~~determined using ~~internal~~valuation models based on market observable inputs, including interest rate curves, forward and spot prices for currencies, and implied volatilities.Credit risk is factored into the fair value calculation of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's derivative instrument portfolio. For interest rate derivative instruments, credit risk is determined at the contract levelwith the use of credit default spreads of either Dell, ifwhen in a net liability position, or the relevant counterparty, when in a net asset position. For foreign exchange derivative instruments, credit risk is determined in a similar manner, except that the credit default spread is applied based on the net position of eachcounterparty with the use of the appropriate credit default spreads.

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~The following table shows a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the respective periods:~~

Three Months Ended
July 30, 2010 July 31, 2009
Retained
U.S.
Retained
U.S.

Interest Corporate Total Interest Corporate Total
(in millions)
Balance at beginning of the period $ - $ 30 $ 30 $ 504 $ 28 $ 532
Net unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings^(a)
- 1 1 17 1 18
Issuances and settlements - - - 100 - 100
Transfers out of Level 3^(b)
- - - (502 ) - (502 )

Balance at end of period $ - $ 31 $ 31 $ 119 $ 29 $ 148

Six Months Ended
July 30, 2010 July 31, 2009
Retained
U.S.
Retained
U.S.

Interest Corporate Total Interest Corporate Total
(in millions)
Balance at beginning of period $ 151 $ 30 $ 181 $ 396 $ 27 $ 423
Net unrealized gains (losses) included in earnings^(a)
- 1 1 8 2 10
Issuances and settlements - - - 217 - 217
Transfers out of Level 3^(b)
(151 ) - (151 ) (502 ) - (502 )

Balance at end of period $ - $ 31 $ 31 $ 119 $ 29 $ 148


~~(a)~~		~~The unrealized gains and losses on U.S. corporate represent accrued interest for assets that were still held at July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009.~~


~~(b)~~		~~Represents transfers out resulting from the SPE consolidation. See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on retained interest.~~

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis — - Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and therefore are not included in the recurring fair value table above. The assets consist primarily of investments accounted for under the cost method and ~~nonfinancial~~non-financial assets such as goodwill and intangible assets. Investments accounted for under the cost method included in equity and other securities, ~~were approximately $20~~approximate $16 million and ~~$22~~$15 million, on ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011, and January ~~29, 2010,~~28, 2011, respectively. Goodwill and intangible assets are measured at fair value initially and subsequently when there is an indicator of impairment and the impairment is recognized. No impairment charges of goodwill and intangible assets were recorded for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July 30, 2010.~~April 29, 2011. See Note 9 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about goodwill and intangible assets.

~~DELL INC.~~

Table of Contents
DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 4 — INVESTMENTS

The following table summarizes, by major security type, the fair value and amortized cost of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's investments. All debt security investments with remaining maturities in excess of one year and substantially all equity and other securities are recorded as long-term investments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

July 30, 2010 January 29, 2010
Fair
Unrealized
Unrealized
Fair
Unrealized
Unrealized
Value Cost Gain (Loss) Value Cost Gain (Loss)
(in millions)
Investments:

U.S. government and agencies $ 55 $ 55 $ - $ - $ 65 $ 65 $ - $ -
U.S. corporate 375 375 - - 233 232 1 -
International corporate 314 314 - - 75 75 - -

Total short-term investments 744 744 - - 373 372 1 -

U.S. government and agencies - - - - 1 1 - -
U.S. corporate 201 201 1 (1 ) 350 349 2 (1 )
International corporate 316 316 1 (1 ) 316 316 1 (1 )
State and municipal governments - - - - 2 2 - -
Equity and other securities 116 116 - - 112 112 - -

Total long-term investments 633 633 2 (2 ) 781 780 3 (2 )

Total investments $ 1,377 $ 1,377 $ 2 $ (2 ) $ 1,154 $ 1,152 $ 4 $ (2 )



	April 29, 2011									January 28, 2011
	Fair Value		Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized (Loss)			Fair Value		Cost		Unrealized Gain		Unrealized (Loss)
	(in millions)
Investments:
U.S. government and agencies	$	7	$	7	$	—	$	—		$	58	$	58	$	—	$	—
U.S. corporate	252		252		—		—			254		253		1		—
International corporate	159		159		—		—			140		140		—		—
Total short-term investments	418		418		—		—			452		451		1		—

U.S. government and agencies	20		20		—		—			21		20		1		—
U.S. corporate	306		306		1		(1		)	242		243		—		(1		)
International corporate	307		306		1		—			317		317		—		—
Equity and other securities	129		129		—		—			124		124		—		—
Total long-term investments	762		761		2		(1		)	704		704		1		(1		)
Total investments	$	1,180	$	1,179	$	2	$	(1	)	$	1,156	$	1,155	$	2	$	(1	)

~~Dell’s~~Dell's investments in debt securities are classified asavailable-for-sale. Equity and other securities primarily relate to investments held in ~~Dell’s~~Dell's Deferred Compensation Plan, which are classified as trading securities. Both of these classes of securities are reported at fair value using the specific identification method. All other investments are initially recorded at cost and reduced for any impairment losses. The fair value of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's portfolio is affected primarily by interest rate movements rather than credit and liquidity risks.Most of Dell's investments in debt securities have contractual maturities of less than five years.

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

At July 30, 2010, Dell had 81 debt securities that were in a loss position with total unrealized losses of $2 million and a corresponding fair value of $395 million. Dell reviews its investment portfolio quarterly to determine if any investment is~~other-than-temporarily~~ ~~impaired. Another-than-temporary~~ impairment (“OTTI”) loss is recognized in earnings if Dell has the intent to sell the debt security, or if it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. However, if Dell does not expect to sell a debt security, it still evaluates expected cash flows to be received and determines if a credit loss exists. In the event of a credit loss, only the amount of impairment associated with the credit loss is recognized in earnings. Amounts relating to factors other than credit losses are recorded in other comprehensive income. As of July 30, 2010, Dell evaluated debt securities classified as~~available-for-sale~~ ~~for OTTI and the existence of credit losses and concluded no such losses should be recognized for the six months ended July 30, 2010.~~

~~DELL INC.~~

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 5 — FINANCIAL SERVICES

Dell Financial Services L.L.C.

Dell offers or arranges various financing options and services for its business and consumer customers in the U.S. through Dell Financial Services L.L.C. (“DFS”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dell. ~~DFS’s~~DFS's key activities include the origination, collection, and servicing of customer receivables related to the purchase of Dell products and services. New financing originations, which represent the amounts of financing provided to customers for equipment and related software and services through DFS, were approximately ~~$1 billion during~~$800 million and $900 million, for the three months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011, and April 30, 2010, respectively.

In April 2011, Dell announced its intent to acquire Dell Financial Services Canada Limited. from CIT Group Inc. ("CIT"), as well as CIT Vendor Finance's Dell-related assets and ~~July 31, 2009,~~sales and ~~$1.9 billion during~~servicing functions in Europe. Dell expects to close the ~~six months ended July 30, 2010,~~acquisition in Canada in the second quarter of Fiscal 2012 and ~~July 31, 2009.~~the acquisition in Europe in Fiscal 2013 subject to customary closing conditions.

Dell transfers certain customer financing receivables to special purpose entities (“SPEs”). The SPEs are bankruptcy remote legal entities with separate assets and liabilities. The purpose of the SPEs is to facilitate the funding of customer receivables in the capital markets. These SPEs have entered into financing arrangements with multi-seller conduits that, in turn, issue asset-backed debt securities in the capital markets. ~~Dell’s~~Dell's risk of loss related to securitized receivables is limited to the amount of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's right to receive collections for assets securitized exceeding the amount required to pay interest, principal, and other fees and ~~expenses.~~expenses related to the asset-backed securities. Dell provides credit enhancement to the securitization in the form of over-collateralization. ~~Prior to Fiscal 2011,~~These SPEs meet the ~~SPE that funds revolving loans was consolidated, and the two SPEs that fund fixed-term leases and loans were not consolidated. In accordance with the new accounting guidance on~~definition of a variable interest ~~entities (“VIEs”),~~entity and ~~transfers of financial assets and extinguishment of financial liabilities,~~ Dell has determined that it is the primary beneficiary of these ~~two~~ SPEs ~~would be~~and has consolidated ~~as of the beginning of Fiscal 2011.~~them in Dell's condensed consolidated financial statements. The primary factors in this determination were the obligation to absorb losses due to the interest Dell retains in the assets transferred to the SPEs in the form of over-collateralization, and the power to direct activities through the servicing role performed by Dell. Dell recorded the assets and liabilities at their carrying amount as of the beginning of Fiscal 2011, with a cumulative effect adjustment of $13 million to the opening balance of retained earnings in Fiscal 2011.

~~Dell’s~~Dell's securitization programs contain standard structural features related to the performance of the securitized receivables. These structural features include defined credit losses, delinquencies, average credit scores, and excess collections above or below specified levels. In the event one or more of these criteria are not met and Dell is unable to restructure the program, no further funding of receivables will be permitted and the timing of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's expected cash flows from over-collateralization will be delayed. At ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011, these criteria were met.

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

Financing Receivables

The following table summarizes the components of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's financing ~~receivables:~~receivables segregated by portfolio segment:



	April 29, 2011									January 28, 2011
	Revolving			Fixed-term			Total			Revolving			Fixed-term			Total
	(in millions)
Financing Receivables, net:
Customer receivables, gross	$	2,200		$	2,031		$	4,231		$	2,396		$	1,992		$	4,388
Allowances for losses	(191		)	(26		)	(217		)	(214		)	(27		)	(241		)
Customer receivables, net	2,009			2,005			4,014			2,182			1,965			4,147
Residual interest	—			314			314			—			295			295
Financing receivables, net	$	2,009		$	2,319		$	4,328		$	2,182		$	2,260		$	4,442
Short-term	$	2,009		$	1,196		$	3,205		$	2,182		$	1,461		$	3,643
Long-term	—			1,123			1,123			—			799			799
Financing receivables, net	$	2,009		$	2,319		$	4,328		$	2,182		$	2,260		$	4,442

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

July 30,
January 29,
2010 2010
(in millions)
Financing receivables, net:

Customer receivables:
Revolving loans, gross $ 1,976 $ 2,046
Fixed-term leases and loans, gross 1,938 824

Customer receivables, gross 3,914 2,870
Allowance for losses (277 ) (237 )

Customer receivables, net 3,637 2,633
Residual interest 257 254
Retained interest - 151

Financing receivables, net $ 3,894 $ 3,038

Short-term $ 3,272 $ 2,706
Long-term 622 332

Financing receivables, net $ 3,894 $ 3,038

Customer receivables consist of all receivables which are either owned by Dell and included in the consolidated financial statements or held by nonconsolidated securitization SPEs in prior periods. In prior periods, Dell had a retained interest in the customer receivables held in nonconsolidated securitization SPEs. The pro forma table below shows what customer receivables would have been if the nonconsolidated securitization SPEs were consolidated as of January 29, 2010:

July 30,
January 29,
2010
2010
(Pro forma)
(in millions)
Customer receivables, gross:

Consolidated receivables $ 3,914 $ 2,870
Receivables in previously nonconsolidated SPEs - 774

Customer receivables, gross $ 3,914 $ 3,644

Customer receivables 60 days or more delinquent $ 125 $ 138

~~DELL INC.~~

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

Included in financing receivables, net, are receivables that are held by consolidated ~~VIEs~~variable interest entities ("VIEs") as shown in the table below:


	July 30,		January 29,
	2010		2010		April 29, 2011		January 28, 2011
	(in millions)				(in millions)
Financing receivables held by consolidated VIEs, net:
Short-term, net	$	1,068	$	277	$	936	$	1,087
Long-term, net		239		-	437		262

Financing receivables held by consolidated VIEs, net	$	1,307	$	277	$	1,373	$	1,349

The following table summarizes the changes in the allowance for financing receivable losses for the ~~three and six months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009:~~

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30,
July 31,
July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009
(in millions)
Allowances for losses:

Balance at beginning of period $ 285 $ 154 $ 237 $ 149
Incremental allowance due to VIE consolidation - - 16 -
Expense charged to income statement 62 55 150 96
Principal charge-offs (57 ) (30 ) (103 ) (60 )
Interest charge-offs (13 ) (6 ) (23 ) (12 )

Balance at end of period $ 277 $ 173 $ 277 $ 173

respective periods:

Three Months Ended
April 29, 2011 April 30, 2010
Revolving Fixed-term Total Revolving Fixed-term Total
(in millions)
Allowance for financing receivable losses:
Balance at the beginning of period $ 214 $ 27 $ 241 $ 224 $ 13 $ 237
Incremental allowance due to VIE consolidation — — — — 16 16
Principal charge-offs (58 ) (2 ) (60 ) (49 ) (6 ) (55 )
Interest charge-offs (11 ) — (11 ) (6 ) — (6 )
Recoveries 19 1 20 5 — 5
Provision charged to income statement 27 — 27 82 6 88
Balance at end of period $ 191 $ 26 $ 217 $ 256 $ 29 $ 285

9
Table of Contents
DELL INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)

The following table summarizes the aging of Dell's customer receivables, gross, including accrued interest, as of April 29, 2011 and January 28, 2011 segregated by class:
April 29, 2011 January 28, 2011
Current Past Due 1 — 90 Days Past Due > 90 Days Total Current Past Due 1 — 90 Days Past Due > 90 Days Total
(in millions)
Revolving — Consumer
Owned since inception $ 1,254 $ 118 $ 40 $ 1,412 $ 1,302 $ 153 $ 48 $ 1,503
Purchased 389 58 23 470 447 88 35 570
Revolving — SMB
Owned since inception 253 20 5 278 246 26 5 277
Purchased 32 6 2 40 34 9 3 46
Fixed-term —
Large Enterprise

Owned since inception 1,154 25 6 1,185 1,077 47 7 1,131
Fixed-term — Public
Owned since inception 423 17 2 442 463 12 1 476
Fixed-term — SMB
Owned since inception 395 7 2 404 371 11 3 385
Total customer receivables, gross $ 3,900 $ 251 $ 80 $ 4,231 $ 3,940 $ 346 $ 102 $ 4,388
The following tables summarize customer receivables, gross, including accrued interest by credit quality indicator segregated by class as of April 29, 2011 and January 28, 2011. For revolving loans to consumers, Dell makes credit decisions based on propriety scorecards which include the customer's credit history, payment history, credit usage, and other FICO-related elements. For Commercial customers, an internal grading system is utilized that assigns a credit level score based on a number of considerations including liquidity, operating performance and industry outlook. These credit level scores range from one to sixteen for Public and Large Enterprise customers, and from one to six for small and medium ("SMB") customers. The categories shown in the tables below segregate between the relative degrees of credit risk within that segment and product set. As loss experience varies substantially between financial products and customer segments, the credit quality categories cannot be compared between the different classes. The credit quality indicators for Consumer accounts are as of each quarter end date. Commercial accounts are generally updated on a periodic basis.
April 29, 2011 January 28, 2011
FICO 720+ FICO 660 to 719 FICO < 660 Total FICO 720+ FICO 660 to 719 FICO < 660 Total
(in millions)
Revolving — Consumer
Owned since inception $ 229 $ 397 $ 786 $ 1,412 $ 251 $ 415 $ 837 $ 1,503
Purchased $ 43 $ 108 $ 319 $ 470 $ 50 $ 127 $ 393 $ 570
For the revolving consumer receivables in the above table, the FICO 720+ category includes prime accounts which are generally higher credit quality, FICO 660 to 719 includes near-prime accounts and represents the mid-tier accounts, and FICO scores below 660 are generally sub-prime and represent lower credit quality accounts.

10
Table of Contents
DELL INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)

April 29, 2011 January 28, 2011
Investment Non-Investment Sub-Standard Total Investment Non-Investment Sub-Standard Total
(in millions)
Fixed-term —
Large Enterprise

Owned since inception $ 874 $ 189 $ 122 $ 1,185 $ 806 $ 166 $ 159 $ 1,131
Fixed-term — Public
Owned since inception $ 402 $ 32 $ 8 $ 442 $ 438 $ 30 $ 8 $ 476
For the Large Enterprise and Public commercial receivables shown above, Dell's internal credit level scoring has been aggregated to their most comparable external commercial rating agency equivalents. Investment grade accounts are generally of the highest credit quality, non-investment grade represents middle quality accounts, and sub-standard represents the lowest quality accounts.
April 29, 2011 January 28, 2011
Higher Mid Lower Total Higher Mid Lower Total
(in millions)
Revolving — SMB
Owned since inception $ 105 $ 85 $ 88 $ 278 $ 108 $ 85 $ 84 $ 277
Purchased $ 14 $ 21 $ 5 $ 40 $ 16 $ 24 $ 6 $ 46
Fixed-term — SMB
Owned since inception $ 40 $ 128 $ 236 $ 404 $ 62 $ 129 $ 194 $ 385
For SMB receivables in the above table, the Higher category includes Dell's top two internal credit quality levels, which generally have the lowest loss experience, Mid includes credit levels three and four, and Lower includes Dell's bottom two credit levels, which experience higher loss rates. The revolving product is sold primarily to small business customers and the fixed-term products are more weighted toward medium-sized businesses. Although both fixed-term and revolving products rely on a six-level internal rating system, the grading criteria and classifications are different as the loss performance varies between these products and customer sets. Therefore, the credit levels are not comparable between the SMB fixed-term and revolving classes.

Customer Receivables

The following is the description of the components of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's customer receivables:

Revolving loans — Revolving loans offered under private label credit financing programs provide qualified customers with a revolving credit line for the purchase of products and services offered by Dell. Revolving loans bear interest at a variable annual percentage rate that is tied to the prime rate. Based on historical payment patterns, revolving loan transactions are typically repaid within 12 months on average. Revolving loans are included in short-term financing receivables. From time to time, account holders may have the opportunity to finance their Dell purchases with special programs during which, if the outstanding balance is paid in full by a specific date, no interest is charged. These special programs generally range from 6 to 12 months. At April 29, 2011, and January 28, 2011, receivables under these special programs were $340 million and $398 million, respectively.


	—	Revolving loans offered under private label credit financing programs provide qualified customers with a revolving credit line for the purchase of products and services offered by Dell. Revolving loans bear interest at a variable annual percentage rate that is tied to the prime rate. Based on historical payment patterns, revolving loan transactions are typically repaid within 12 months. Revolving loans are included in short-term financing receivables. From time to time, account holders may have the opportunity to finance their Dell purchases with special programs during which, if the outstanding balance is paid in full by a specific date, no interest is charged. These special programs generally range from six to 12 months. At July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, receivables under these special programs were $381 million and $442 million, respectively.

	—	Dell enters into sales-type lease arrangements with customers who desire lease financing. Leases with business customers have fixed terms of generally two to four years. Future maturities of minimum lease payments at July 30, 2010 for Dell are as follows: Fiscal 2011 — $502 million; Fiscal 2012 — $667 million; Fiscal 2013 — $377 million; Fiscal 2014 and beyond — $75 million. Fixed-term loans are offered to qualified small businesses, large commercial accounts, governmental organizations, and educational entities.

~~DELL INC.~~

Sales-type leases — Dell enters into sales-type lease arrangements with customers who desire lease financing. Leases with business customers have fixed terms of generally two to four years. Future maturities of minimum lease payments at April 29, 2011 were as follows: Fiscal 2012 - $724 million; Fiscal 2013 - $696 million; Fiscal 2014 - $332 million; Fiscal 2015 and beyond - $61 million. Fixed-term loans are offered to qualified small businesses, large commercial accounts, governmental organizations, and educational entities.

Table of Contents
DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans
Purchased Credit-Impaired (“PCI”) loans are acquired loans for which it is probable that Dell will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. During the third quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell purchased a portfolio of revolving loan receivables from CIT Group Inc. that consisted of revolving Dell customer account balances that met the definition of PCI loans as Dell does not expect to collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. At April 29, 2011, the outstanding balance of these receivables, including principal and accrued interest, was $489 million and the carrying amount was $294 million.
The excess of cash flows expected to be collected over the carrying value of PCI loans is referred to as the accretable yield and is accreted into interest income using the effective yield method based on the expected future cash flows over the estimated lives of the PCI loans. Due to improved expectations of the amount of expected cash flows and higher recoveries, Dell increased the accretable yield associated with these PCI loans by $35 million during the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, which will be amortized over the remaining life of the loans.
The following table shows activity for the accretable yield on the PCI loans for the three months ended April 29, 2011:
Three Months Ended
April 29,
2011
(in millions)
Accretable Yield:
Balance at beginning of period $ 137
Additions/ Purchases —
Accretion (21 )
Prospective yield adjustment 35
Balance at end of period $ 151

Residual Interest

Dell retains a residual interest in equipment leased under its fixed-term lease programs. The amount of the residual interest is established at the inception of the lease based upon estimates of the value of the equipment at the end of the lease term using historical studies, industry data, and futurevalue-at-risk demand valuation methods. On a quarterly basis, Dell assesses the carrying amount of its recorded residual values for impairment. Anticipated declines in specific future residual values that are considered to beother-than-temporary are recorded ~~currently~~ in earnings.

Asset Securitizations

During the first quarters of Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, $499 million and $496 million of customer receivables, respectively, were funded via securitization through SPEs. The programs are effective for 12 month periods and subject to an annual renewal process.


	—	~~The gross balance of securitized receivables reported off-balance sheet as of January~~ The structured financing debt related to the fixed-term lease and loan, and revolving loan securitization programs was $1.2 billion and $1.0 billion as of April 29, 2010, was $774 million, and the associated debt was $624 million. As discussed above, as of the beginning of Fiscal 2011, all previously nonconsolidated qualified special purpose entities were consolidated. Upon consolidation of these customer receivables and associated debt at the beginning of Fiscal 2011, Dell’s retained interest in securitized receivables of $151 million at January 29, 2010, was eliminated. A $13 million decrease to beginning retained earnings for Fiscal 2011 was recorded as a cumulative effect adjustment due to adoption of the new accounting guidance.

	—	During the second quarters of Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, $524 million and $262 million of customer receivables, respectively, were funded via securitization through SPEs. During the six months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009, $1 billion and $495 million, respectively, of customer receivables were funded via securitization through SPEs.

	—	The structured financing debt related to the fixed-term lease and loan, and revolving loan securitization programs was $918 million and $788 million as of July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, respectively. This includes $624 million at January 29, 2010, held by nonconsolidated SPEs. The debt is collateralized solely by the financing receivables in the programs. The debt has a variable interest rate and an average duration of 12 to 36 months based on the terms of the underlying financing receivables. The maximum debt capacity related to the securitization programs is $1.1 billion. See Note 6 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the structured financing debt.

	—	~~During the first half of Fiscal~~ 2011, and January 28, 2011, respectively. The debt is collateralized solely by the financing receivables in the programs. The debt has a variable interest rate and an average duration of 12 to 36 months based on the terms of the underlying financing receivables. The total debt capacity related to the securitization programs is $1.4 billion. See Note 6 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding the structured financing debt. During Fiscal 2011, Dell entered into interest rate swap agreements to effectively convert a portion of the structured financing debt from a floating rate to a fixed rate. The interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting treatment as cash flow ~~hedges. See Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about interest rate swaps.~~

~~Retained Interest~~

Prior to adopting the new accounting guidance on VIEs and transfers of financial assets and extinguishment of financial liabilities, certain transfers of financial assets to nonconsolidated qualified SPEs were accounted for as a sale. Upon the sale of the customer receivables to the SPEs, Dell recognized a gain on the sale and retained a residual beneficial interest in the pool of assets sold, referred to as retained interest. The retained interest represented Dell’s right to receive collections for assets securitized exceeding the amount required to pay interest, principal, and other fees and expenses.

Retained interest was stated at the present value of the estimated net beneficial cash flows after payment of all senior interests. Dell valued the retained interest at the time of each receivable transfer and at the end of each reporting period. The fair value of the retained interest was determined using a discounted cash flow model with various key assumptions, including payment rates, credit losses, discount rates, and the remaining life of the receivables sold. These assumptions were supported by both Dell’s historical experience and anticipated trends relative to the particular receivable pool. The key valuation assumptions for retained interest could have been affected by many factors, including repayment terms and the credit quality of receivables securitized.

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~The following table summarizes the activity in retained interest for the three and six months ended July 31, 2009:~~

Three Months
Six Months
Ended Ended
July 31,
July 31,
2009 2009
(in millions)
Retained interest:

Retained interest at beginning of period $ 504 $ 396
Issuances 125 252
Distributions from conduits (25 ) (35 )
Net accretion 14 24
Change in fair value for the period 3 (16 )
Impact of special purpose entity consolidation (502 ) (502 )

Retained interest at end of period $ 119 $ 119

~~The table below summarizes the key assumptions used to measure the fair value of the retained interest at time of transfer during the three months ended July 31, 2009:~~

Weighted Average Key Assumptions
Monthly

Payment
Credit
Discount

Rates Losses Rates Life
(lifetime) (annualized) (months)
Time of transfer valuation of retained interest 5% 1% 12% 19

~~The charge-off statistics for securitized leases and loans held by nonconsolidated special purpose entities are:~~


	—	Net principal charge-offs on securitized receivables were $30 million for the three months ended July 31, 2009, which when annualized represents 8.8% of the average outstanding securitized financing receivable balance for the period.

	—	Net principal charge-offs on securitized receivables were $66 million for the six months ended July 31, 2009, which when annualized represents 9.7% of the average outstanding securitized financing receivable balance for the period.

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~NOTE 6 — BORROWINGS~~

~~The following table summarizes Dell’s outstanding debt at:~~

July 30,
January 29,
2010 2010
(in millions)
Long-Term Debt

Notes:

$400 million issued on June 10, 2009, at 3.375% due June 2012 (“2012 Notes”) with interest payable June 15 and December 15
(includes hedge accounting adjustments) $ 404 $ 401
$600 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 4.70% due April 2013 (“2013 Notes”) with interest payable April 15 and October 15
(includes hedge accounting adjustments) 613 599
$500 million issued on April 1, 2009, at 5.625% due April 2014 (“2014 Notes”) with interest payable April 15 and October 15 500 500
$500 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 5.65% due April 2018 (“2018 Notes”) with interest payable April 15 and October 15 499 499
$600 million issued on June 10, 2009, at 5.875% due June 2019 (“2019 Notes”) with interest payable June 15 and December 15 600 600
$400 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 6.50% due April 2038 (“2038 Notes”) with interest payable April 15 and October 15 400 400
Senior Debentures

$300 million issued on April 3, 1998, at 7.10% due April 2028 with interest payable April 15 and October 15 (includes the impact of interest rate swap terminations) 392 394
Other

India term loan: entered into on October 15, 2009, at 8.9% due October 2011 with interest payable monthly 23 24
Structured financing debt 192 -

Total long-term debt 3,623 3,417

Short-Term Debt

Commercial paper 900 496
Structured financing debt 726 164
Other 1 3

Total short-term debt 1,627 663

Total debt $ 5,250 $ 4,080

The estimated fair value of total debt at July 30, 2010, was approximately $5.5 billion. The fair values of the India term loan, structured financing debt, commercial paper, and other short-term debt approximate their carrying values. The carrying value of the Senior Debentures includes an unamortized amount related to the termination of interest rate swap agreements in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2009, which were previously designated as hedges of the debt.

During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011 and fourth quarter of Fiscal 2010, Dell entered into interest rate swap agreements to effectively convert the fixed rates of the 2012 Notes and 2013 Notes to floating rates. The floating

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~rates are based on six-month or three-month LIBOR plus a fixed rate. The interest rate swaps qualified for hedge accounting treatment as fair value~~ hedges. See Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about interest rate swaps.

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 6 — BORROWINGS

The following table summarizes Dell's outstanding debt at the dates indicated:



	April 29, 2011		January 28, 2011
	(in millions)
Long-Term Debt
Notes
$400 million issued on June 10, 2009, at 3.375% due June 2012 (“2012 Notes”) with interest payable June 15 and December 15 (includes impact of interest rate swap terminations)	$	400	$	400
$600 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 4.70% due April 2013 (“2013A Notes”) with interest payable April 15 and October 15 (includes impact of interest rate swap terminations)	608		609
$500 million issued on September 7, 2010, at 1.40% due September 2013 (“2013B Notes”) with interest payable March 10 and September 10	499		499
$500 million issued on April 1, 2009, at 5.625% due April 2014 (“2014A Notes”) with interest payable April 15 and October 15	500		500
$300 million issued on March 28, 2011, with a floating rate due April 2014 (“2014B Notes”) with interest payable January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1	300		—
$400 million issued on March 28, 2011, at 2.10% due April 2014 (“2014C Notes”) with interest payable April 1 and October 1	400		—
$700 million issued on September 7, 2010, at 2.30% due September 2015 (“2015 Notes”) with interest payable March 10 and September 10	700		700
$400 million issued on March 28, 2011, at 3.10% due April 2016 (“2016 Notes”) with interest payable April 1 and October 1	400		—
$500 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 5.65% due April 2018 (“2018 Notes”) with interest payable April 15 and October 15	499		499
$600 million issued on June 10, 2009, at 5.875% due June 2019 (“2019 Notes”) with interest payable June 15 and December 15	600		600
$400 million issued on March 28, 2011, at 4.625% due April 2021 (“2021 Notes”) with interest payable April 1 and October 1	398		—
$400 million issued on April 17, 2008, at 6.50% due April 2038 (“2038 Notes”) with interest payable April 15 and October 15	400		400
$300 million issued on September 7, 2010, at 5.40% due September 2040 (“2040 Notes”) with interest payable March 10 and September 10	300		300
Senior Debentures
$300 million issued on April 3, 1998 at 7.10% due April 2028 with interest payable April 15 and October 15 (includes the impact of interest rate swap terminations) ("Senior Debentures")	388		389
Other
Structured financing debt	402		250
Total long-term debt	6,794		5,146
Short-Term Debt
Structured financing debt	815		850
Other	1		1
Total short-term debt	816		851
Total debt	$	7,610	$	5,997

During the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, Dell issued the 2014B Notes, the 2014C Notes, the 2016 Notes and the 2021 Notes (collectively, the “Issued Notes”) under an automatic shelf registration statement that was filed in November 2008 and subsequently amended in March 2011. The net proceeds from the Issued Notes, after payment of expenses, were approximately $1.5 billion. The Issued Notes are unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with Dell's existing and future unsecured senior indebtedness. The Issued Notes effectively rank junior to all indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade payables, of Dell's subsidiaries. The Issued Notes were issued pursuant to a Supplemental Indenture dated March 31, 2011,

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

between Dell and a trustee, with terms and conditions substantially the same as those governing the Notes outstanding as of January 28, 2011 (such outstanding Notes, together with the Issued Notes, the "Notes").

The estimated fair value of total debt at April 29, 2011, was approximately $7.8 billion. The fair values of the structured financing debt, and other short-term debt approximate their carrying values as their interest rates vary with the market. The carrying value of the senior debentures, the 2012 Notes, and the 2013A Notes includes an unamortized amount related to the termination of interest rate swap agreements, which were previously designated as hedges of the debt. See Note 7 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information about interest rate swaps.

Structured Financing Debt — As of April 29, 2011, Dell had $1.2 billion outstanding in structured financing related debt primarily through the fixed term lease and loan, and revolving loan securitization programs. The weighted average interest rate for short-term structured financing debt for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 was 0.4%. See Note 5 and Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on structured financing debt and interest rate swap agreements that hedge a portion of that debt.

Commercial Paper — Dell has $3.0 billion in senior unsecured revolving credit facilities, primarily to support a $2.0 billion commercial paper program. As of April 29, 2011 and January 28, 2011, there was no outstanding commercial paper.

On April 15, 2011, Dell replaced the five-year $1.0 billion credit facility expiring on June 1, 2011, with a four-year $2.0 billion credit facility that will expire on April 15, 2015. Dell's remaining credit facility for $1.0 billion will expire on April 2, 2013. There were no outstanding advances under the revolving credit facilities as of April 29, 2011.

The indentures governing the Notes, the ~~Senior Debentures,~~senior debentures, and the structured financing debt contain customary events of default, including failure to make required payments, failure to comply with certain agreements or covenants, and certain events of bankruptcy and insolvency. The indentures also contain covenants limiting ~~Dell’s~~Dell's ability to create certain liens; enter intosale-and-lease back transactions; and consolidate or merge with, or convey, transfer or lease all or substantially all of its assets to, another person. ~~As of July 30, 2010, there were no events of default with respect to the Notes, the Senior Debentures, or the structured financing debt.~~

~~Structured Financing Debt~~— ~~As of July 30, 2010, Dell had $918 million outstanding in structured financing related debt through the fixed term lease and loan and~~The senior unsecured revolving loan securitization programs. See Note 5 and Note 7 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion on structured financing debt and its related interest rate swap agreements.

~~Commercial Paper —~~During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell entered into a new agreement to expand its commercial paper program from $1.5 billion to $2 billion. At July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, there was $900 million and $496 million, respectively, outstanding under the commercial paper program. The weighted-average interest rate on these outstanding short-term borrowings was 0.23% and 0.24%, respectively.

During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell expanded the revolving credit facilities from $1.5 billion to $2 billion. Dell’s $2 billion in credit facilities consist of two agreements with $1 billion expiring on June 1, 2011 and the remaining $1 billion expiring on April 2, 2013. The credit facilities require compliance with conditions that must be satisfied prior to any borrowing, as well as ongoing compliance with specified affirmative and negative covenants, including maintenance of a minimum interest coverage ratio. ~~As of July 30, 2010, there were no events of default and~~ Dell was in compliance with ~~its minimum interest coverage ratio covenant. Amounts outstanding under the facilities may be accelerated for events of default, including failure to pay principal or interest, breaches of~~all financial covenants ~~or non-payment of judgments or debt obligations. There were no outstanding advances under the related revolving credit facilities~~ as of ~~July 30, 2010.~~April 29, 2011.

NOTE 7 — DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

Derivative Instruments

As part of its risk management strategy, Dell uses derivative instruments, primarily forward contracts and purchased options, to hedge certain foreign currency exposures and interest rate swaps to manage the exposure of its debt portfolio to interest rate risk. ~~Dell’s~~Dell's objective is to offset gains and losses resulting from these exposures with gains and losses on the derivative contracts used to hedge the exposures, thereby reducing volatility of earnings and protecting fair values of assets and liabilities. Dell ~~applies~~assesses hedge ~~accounting based upon~~effectiveness both at the ~~criteria established by accounting guidance for~~onset of the hedge and at regular intervals throughout the life of the derivative ~~instruments~~ and ~~hedging activities, including designation~~recognizes any ineffective portion of ~~its derivatives~~the hedge, as ~~fair value hedges or cash flow hedges and~~well as amounts not included in the assessment of ~~hedge effectiveness. Dell records all derivatives~~effectiveness, in ~~its Condensed Consolidated Statements~~earnings as a component of ~~Financial Position at fair value.~~interest and other, net.

Foreign Exchange Risk

~~Cash Flow Hedges~~

Dell uses a combination of forward contracts and purchased options designated as cash flow hedges to protect against the foreign currency exchange rate risks inherent in its forecasted transactions denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The risk of loss associated with purchased options is limited to premium amounts paid for the option contracts. The risk of loss associated with forward contracts is equal to the exchange rate differential from the time the contract is entered into until the time it is settled. The majority of these contracts typically expire in 12 months or less.

Dell assessed hedge ineffectiveness for cash flow hedges for the three months ended April 29, 2011 and determined that it was not material. During the three months ended April 29, 2011, Dell did not discontinue any cash flow hedges that had a material impact on Dell's results of operations, as substantially all forecasted foreign currency transactions were realized in Dell's actual results.

In addition, Dell uses forward contracts to hedge monetary assets and liabilities, primarily receivables and payables, denominated in a foreign currency. These contracts generally expire in three months or less, are considered economic hedges and are not designated. The change in the fair value of these instruments represents a natural hedge as their gains and losses

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

offset the changes in the underlying fair value of the monetary assets and liabilities due to movements in currency exchange rates. Dell recognized gains of $42 million and $17 million during the three months ended April 29, 2011 and April 30, 2010, respectively, for the change in fair value of these foreign currency forward contracts.

Interest Rate Risk

Dell uses interest rate swaps ~~designated as cash flow hedges~~ to hedge the variability in cash flows related to the interest rate payments on structured financing debt. The interest rate swaps economically convert the variable rate on the structured financing debt to a fixed interest rate to match the underlying fixed rate being received on fixed term customer leases and loans. The duration of these contracts typically ranges from 30 to 42 months.

~~For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, Dell records the effective portion~~ Certain of ~~the gain or loss on the derivative instrument in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and reclassifies~~ these amounts into earnings in the period during which the hedged transaction is recognized in earnings. Dell reports the effective portion of cash flow hedges in the same financial statement line item within earnings as the changes in value of the hedged item.

~~For derivative instruments~~swaps are designated as cash flow hedges, Dell assesses hedge effectiveness both at the onset of the hedge and at regular intervals throughout the life of the derivative. Dell measures hedge ineffectiveness by comparing the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedge contract with the cumulative change in the fair value of the hedged item, both of which are based on forward rates. Dell recognizes any ineffective portion of the hedge, as well as amounts not included in the assessment of effectiveness, in earnings as a component of interest and other, net.hedges. Hedge ineffectiveness for interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges was not material for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July 30, 2010. During~~April 29, 2011.

The amount of change in fair value recognized in interest and other, net, for interest rate hedges was not material for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011 and April 30, 2010.

Periodically, Dell also uses interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges to modify the market risk exposures in connection with long-term debt to achieve primarily LIBOR-based floating interest expense. Dell did not ~~discontinue~~have any ~~cash flow~~interest rate contracts designated as fair value hedges ~~that~~at April 29, 2011. During Fiscal 2011, Dell had ainterest rate swap agreements associated with its 2012 Notes and 2013A Notes, which were terminated in the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2011. Hedge ineffectiveness for interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges was not material ~~impact on Dell’s results of operations. Substantially all forecasted foreign currency transactions were realized in Dell’s actual results.~~for the three months ended April 30, 2010.

Notional Amounts of Outstanding Derivative Instruments

The notional amounts of Dell's outstanding derivative instruments are summarized as follows:



	April 29, 2011		January 28, 2011
	(in millions)
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Designated as hedging instruments	$	5,266	$	5,364
Non-designated as hedging instruments	318		250
Total	$	5,584	$	5,614

Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as hedging instruments	$	643	$	625
Non-designated as hedging instruments	130		145
Total	$	773	$	770

Derivative Instruments Additional Information

The aggregate unrealized net gain or loss for interest rate swaps and foreign currency exchange contracts, recorded as a component of comprehensive income, for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011 and April 30, 2010, was ~~$127 million and $114 million, respectively.~~

~~Fair Value Hedges~~

Dell enters into interest rate swaps designated as fair value hedges to manage the exposure of its debt portfolio to interest rate risk. Dell issues long-term debt in U.S. dollars based on market conditions at the time of financing. Dell uses interest rate swaps to modify the market risk exposures in connection with the debt to achieve primarily U.S. dollar LIBOR-based floating interest expense. As of July 30, 2010, the interest rate swaps hedge all interest rate exposure on the 2012 and 2013 Notes. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the value of the derivative and underlying hedged item are recognized in interest and other, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income in the current period.

As of July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, the total notional amount of the interest rate swaps was $1 billion and $200 million, respectively. During the three and six months ended July 30, 2010, the fair value change of the interest rate contracts, and offsetting adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged debt resulted in a $4 million gain and a $5 million gain to interest and other, net, respectively. During the three and six months ended July 30, 2010, fair value adjustments increased the carrying amount of the hedged fixed-rate debt outstanding by $14 million and $17 million, respectively. Dell did not have any fair value hedges during the six months ended July 31, 2009.

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income~~

Gain (Loss)

Recognized

in Accumulated
Location of Gain (Loss)
Gain (Loss)

Derivatives in
OCI, Net
Reclassified
Reclassified
Location of Gain (Loss)
Gain (Loss)
Cash Flow
of Tax, on
from Accumulated
from Accumulated
Recognized in Income
Recognized in
Hedging
Derivatives
OCI into Income
OCI into Income
on Derivative
Income on Derivative
Relationships (Effective Portion) (Effective Portion) (Effective Portion) (Ineffective Portion) (Ineffective Portion)
(in millions)

For the three months ended July 30, 2010
Foreign exchange Total net revenue $ 77
contracts $ (60 ) Total cost of net revenue (10 )
Interest rate contracts 1 Interest and other, net - Interest and other, net $ -

Total $ (59 ) $ 67 $ -

For the three months ended July 31, 2009
Foreign exchange Total net revenue $ (147 )
contracts $ (289 ) Total cost of net revenue (23 ) Interest and other, net $ -

Total $ (289 ) $ (170 ) $ -

For the six months ended July 30, 2010
Foreign exchange Total net revenue $ 123
contracts $ (19 ) Total cost of net revenue (28 )
Interest rate contracts 1 Interest and other, net - Interest and other, net $ -

Total $ (18 ) $ 95 $ -

For the six months ended July 31, 2009
Foreign exchange Total net revenue $ 74
contracts $ (413 ) Total cost of net revenue (10 ) Interest and other, net $ -

Total $ (413 ) $ 64 $ -

As of July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, the total notional amount of foreign currency option and forward contracts designated as cash flow hedges was $5.2 billion and $4.2 billion, respectively. As of July 30, 2010, the total notional amount of interest rate contracts designated as cash flow hedges was $507 million. As of July 30, 2010, the total notional amount of interest rate contracts not designated as hedges was $194 million.

~~Other Derivative Instruments~~

Dell uses forward contracts to hedge monetary assets and liabilities, primarily receivables and payables, denominated in a foreign currency. The change in the fair value of these instruments represents a natural hedge as their gains and losses offset the changes in the underlying fair value of the monetary assets and liabilities due to movements in currency exchange rates. These contracts generally expire in three months or less. These contracts are considered economic hedges and are not designated as hedges under derivative instruments and hedging activities accounting, and therefore, the change in the instrument’s fair value is recognized currently in earnings as a component of interest and other, net. Dell recognized a gain of $41 million and a loss of ~~$72~~$68 million ~~with respect to its foreign currency forward contracts, during the second quarters of Fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively,~~ and a ~~$59~~$13 million gain, ~~and a $26 million loss during the six months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009,~~ respectively. ~~As of July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, the total notional amount of other foreign currency forward contracts not designated as hedges was $396 million and $20 million, respectively.~~

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~Derivative Instruments Additional Information~~

Cash flows from derivative instruments are presented in the same category in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as the cash flows from the intended hedged items or the economic hedges.

While Dell has foreign exchange derivative contracts in more than 20 currencies, the majority of the notional amounts are denominated in the Euro, British Pound, Japanese Yen, Canadian Dollar, and Australian Dollar.

Dell presents its foreign exchange derivative instruments on a net basis in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position due to the right of offset by its counterparties under master netting arrangements. The fair values of foreign exchange and interest rate derivative instruments presented on a gross basis for the period are as follows:

July 30, 2010
Other
Other
Other
Other

Current
Non-Current
Current
Non-Current
Total
Assets Assets Liabilities Liabilities Fair Value
(in millions)
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position $ 158 $ 3 $ 42 $ - $ 203
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position (149 ) - (68 ) (1 ) (218 )
Interest rate contracts in an asset position - 23 - - 23
Interest rate contracts in a liability position - - - (4 ) (4 )

Net asset (liability) 9 26 (26 ) (5 ) 4

Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position 103 - 18 - 121
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position (18 ) - (22 ) - (40 )
Interest rate contracts in a liability position - - - (2 ) (2 )

Net asset (liability) 85 - (4 ) (2 ) 79

Total derivatives at fair value $ 94 $ 26 $ (30 ) $ (7 ) $ 83

January 29, 2010
Other
Other
Other
Other

Current
Non-Current
Current
Non-Current
Total
Assets Assets Liabilities Liabilities Fair Value
(in millions)
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments

Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position $ 181 $ 5 $ - $ - $ 186
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position (80 ) - (9 ) - (89 )
Interest rate contracts in an asset position - 1 - - 1

Net asset (liability) 101 6 (9 ) - 98

Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments

Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position 63 - 2 - 65
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position (74 ) - (5 ) - (79 )

Net asset (liability) (11 ) - (3 ) - (14 )

Total derivatives at fair value $ 90 $ 6 $ (12 ) $ - $ 84

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

Dell has reviewed the existence and nature of credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative trading agreements with its counterparties. Certain agreements contain clauses ~~whereby~~under which if ~~Dell’s~~Dell's credit ratings were to fall below investment grade upon a change of control of Dell, counterparties would have the right to terminate those derivative contracts under which Dell is in a net liability position. As of ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011, there ~~have~~had been no such triggering events.

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
Derivatives in
Cash Flow
Hedging Relationships

Gain (Loss)
Recognized
in Accumulated
OCI, Net
of Tax, on
Derivatives
(Effective Portion)

Location of Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)

Gain (Loss)
Reclassified
from Accumulated
OCI into Income
(Effective Portion)
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion) Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)
(in millions)
For the three months ended April 29, 2011
Total net revenue $ (156 )
Foreign exchange contracts $ (242 ) Total cost of net revenue (18 )
Interest rate contracts — Interest and other, net — Interest and other, net $ —
Total $ (242 ) $ (174 ) $ —

For the three months ended April 30, 2010
Total net revenue $ 46
Foreign exchange contracts $ 40 Total cost of net revenue (18 ) Interest and other, net $ 1
Total $ 40 $ 28 $ 1

16
Table of Contents
DELL INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position
Dell presents its foreign exchange derivative instruments on a net basis in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position due to the right of offset by its counterparties under master netting arrangements. The fair value of those derivative instruments presented on a gross basis as of each date indicated below is as follows:
April 29, 2011

Other Current
Assets

Other Non-
Current Assets

Other Current
Liabilities

Other Non-Current
Liabilities

Total
Fair Value
(in millions)
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position $ 26 $ 1 $ 49 $ — $ 76
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position (59 ) — (224 ) — (283 )
Interest rate contracts in a liability position — — — (2 ) (2 )
Net asset (liability) (33 ) 1 (175 ) (2 ) (209 )
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position 101 — 59 — 160
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position (9 ) — (40 ) — (49 )
Interest rate contracts in a liability position — — — (1 ) (1 )
Net asset (liability) 92 — 19 (1 ) 110
Total derivatives at fair value $ 59 $ 1 $ (156 ) $ (3 ) $ (99 )

January 28, 2011

Other Current
Assets

Other Non-
Current Assets

Other Current
Liabilities

Other Non-Current
Liabilities

Total
Fair Value
(in millions)
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position $ 81 $ 1 $ 34 $ — $ 116
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position (86 ) — (59 ) — (145 )
Interest rate contracts in a liability position — — — (2 ) (2 )
Net asset (liability) (5 ) 1 (25 ) (2 ) (31 )
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position 52 — 15 — 67
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position (21 ) — (15 ) — (36 )
Interest rate contracts in a liability position — — — (1 ) (1 )
Net asset (liability) 31 — — (1 ) 30
Total derivatives at fair value $ 26 $ 1 $ (25 ) $ (3 ) $ (1 )

17
Table of Contents
DELL INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)

NOTE 8 — ACQUISITIONS

During the three months ended April 29, 2011, Dell completed ~~three~~two acquisitions, ~~during the first half~~ of ~~Fiscal 2011, Kace Networks,~~Compellent Technologies, Inc. ~~(“KACE”), Ocarina Networks Inc. (“Ocarina”~~("Compellent"), and ~~Scalent Systems~~SecureWorks Inc. ~~(“Scalent”~~("SecureWorks") ~~for a~~, and paid total purchase consideration of approximately ~~$275 million~~$1.5 billion in ~~cash. KACE is a systems management appliance company with solutions tailored to~~cash for all the ~~requirements~~outstanding shares of ~~mid-sized businesses. KACE is being integrated primarily into Dell’s Small and Medium Business and Public segments. Ocarina~~these companies. Compellent is a provider of ~~de-duplication~~virtual storage solutions for enterprise and ~~content-aware compression across storage product lines. Scalent~~cloud computing environments, and SecureWorks is a global provider of ~~scalable~~information security services. Both Compellent and ~~efficient data center infrastructure software. Ocarina and Scalent~~SecureWorks will be integrated into ~~Dell’s~~Dell's Commercial segments.

Dell has recorded these acquisitions using the acquisition method of accounting and recorded their respective assets and liabilities at fair value at the date of acquisition. The ~~excesses~~excess of the purchase prices over the estimated fair values ~~were~~was recorded as goodwill. Any changes in the estimated fair values of the net assets recorded for these acquisitions prior to the finalization of more detailed analyses, but not to exceed one year from the date of acquisition, will change the amount of the purchase prices allocable to goodwill. Specifically, Dell’s acquisition of Ocarina was completed on July 29, 2010, one day prior to the end of the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. As such, the purchase price allocations for this transaction are preliminary estimates, which are subject to change within the measurement period. The primary area of the purchase price allocation not yet finalized relates to the fair value of intangible assets acquired. Any subsequent changes to the purchase price allocations that are material to ~~Dell’s~~Dell's consolidated financial results will be adjusted retroactively. Dell recorded approximately ~~$181 million~~$1 billion in goodwill ~~and $110~~related to these acquisitions, which primarily represents synergies associated with combining these companies with Dell to provide Dell's customers with a broader range of IT solutions. This goodwill is not deductible for tax purposes. Dell also recorded $537 million in intangible assets related to these ~~acquisitions. The goodwill related to these~~ acquisitions, ~~is not deductible for tax purposes.~~which consist primarily of purchased technology and customer relationships. In conjunction with these acquisitions, Dell will incur ~~$45~~$99 million in compensation-related expenses that will be expensed over a period of ~~one~~up to ~~three~~four years. There was no contingent consideration related to these acquisitions.

Dell has not presented pro forma results of operations for ~~KACE, Ocarina, or Scalent~~the foregoing acquisitions because ~~these acquisitions~~they are not material to ~~Dell’s~~Dell's consolidated results of operations, financial position, or cash ~~flows.~~flows on either an individual or an aggregate basis.

NOTE 9 — GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

~~Goodwill~~

Goodwill allocated to ~~Dell’s~~Dell's business segments as of ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011, and January ~~29, 2010,~~28, 2011, and changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:



	Large Enterprise		Public		Small and Medium Business		Consumer		Total
	(in millions)
Balance at January 28, 2011	$	1,424	$	2,164	$	476	$	301	$	4,365
Goodwill acquired during the period	596		290		153		—		1,039
Adjustments	2		—		—		—		2
Balance at April 29, 2011	$	2,022	$	2,454	$	629	$	301	$	5,406

Small and

Large
Medium

Enterprise Public Business Consumer Total
(in millions)
Balance at January 29, 2010 $ 1,361 $ 2,026 $ 389 $ 298 $ 4,074
Goodwill acquired during the period 58 70 53 - 181
Adjustments 1 5 - 3 9

Balance at July 30, 2010 $ 1,420 $ 2,101 $ 442 $ 301 $ 4,264

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

Goodwill ~~and indefinite-lived intangibles are~~is tested annually during the second fiscal quarter and whenever events or circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred. If the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its fair value, estimated based on discounted cash flow analyses, an impairment charge would be recorded. ~~During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, Dell evaluated goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles for potential triggering events that could indicate impairment.~~ Based on the results of ~~its evaluation, Dell determined that~~the annual impairment tests, no impairment of goodwill ~~and indefinite-lived intangible assets~~ existed at July 30, 2010. Further, no triggering events have transpired since July 30, 2010, that would indicate a potential impairment of goodwill as of April 29, 2011. Dell does not have any accumulated goodwill impairment charges as of ~~July 30, 2010.~~April 29, 2011. The goodwill adjustments are primarily the result of foreign currency fluctuations.

During the three months ended April 29, 2011, Dell recorded additions to intangible assets of $537 million related to Dell's Fiscal 2012 business acquisitions.

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 10 — WARRANTY AND DEFERRED EXTENDED WARRANTY REVENUE

Dell records liabilities for its standard limited warranties at the time of sale for the estimated costs that may be incurred. The liability for standard warranties is included in accrued and other current and other non-current liabilities on ~~Dell’s~~the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Revenue from the sale of extended warranties is recognized over the term of the contract or when the service is completed, and the costs associated with these contracts are recognized as incurred. Deferred extended warranty revenue is included in deferred services revenue on ~~Dell’s~~the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position. Changes in ~~Dell’s~~Dell's liabilities for standard limited warranties and deferred services revenue related to extended warranties are presented in the following tables:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30,
July 31,
July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009
(in millions)
Warranty liability

Warranty liability at beginning of period $ 927 $ 1,032 $ 912 $ 1,035
Costs accrued for new warranty contracts and changes in estimates for pre-existing warranties^{(a), (b)}
298 193 608 487
Services obligations honored (249 ) (253 ) (544 ) (550 )

Warranty liability at end of period $ 976 $ 972 $ 976 $ 972

Current portion $ 652 $ 501 $ 652 $ 501
Non-current portion 324 471 324 471

Warranty liability at end of period $ 976 $ 972 $ 976 $ 972

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30,
July 31,
July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009
(in millions)
Deferred extended warranty revenue:

Deferred extended warranty revenue at beginning of period $ 5,971 $ 5,576 $ 5,910 $ 5,587
Revenue deferred for new extended warranties^(b)
973 950 1,855 1,699
Revenue recognized (835 ) (758 ) (1,656 ) (1,518 )

Deferred extended warranty revenue at end of period $ 6,109 $ 5,768 $ 6,109 $ 5,768

Current portion $ 2,835 $ 2,730 $ 2,835 $ 2,730
Non-current portion 3,274 3,038 3,274 3,038

Deferred extended warranty revenue at end of period $ 6,109 $ 5,768 $ 6,109 $ 5,768



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011			April 30, 2010
	(in millions)
Warranty liability:
Warranty liability at beginning of period	$	895		$	912
Costs accrued for new warranty contracts and changes in estimates for pre-existing warranties^(a)(b)	293			310
Service obligations honored	(257		)	(295		)
Warranty liability at end of period	$	931		$	927
Current portion	$	620		$	626
Non-current portion	311			301
Warranty liability at end of period	$	931		$	927

	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011			April 30, 2010
	(in millions)
Deferred extended warranty revenue:
Deferred extended warranty revenue at beginning of period	$	6,416		$	5,910
Revenue deferred for new extended warranties^(b)	1,068			882
Revenue recognized	(895		)	(821		)
Deferred extended warranty revenue at end of period	$	6,589		$	5,971
Current portion	$	3,060		$	2,809
Non-current portion	3,529			3,162
Deferred extended warranty revenue at end of period	$	6,589		$	5,971

____________________


^(a)		Changes in cost estimates related to pre-existing warranties are aggregated with accruals for new standard warranty contracts. ~~Dell’s~~Dell's warranty liability process does not differentiate between estimates made for pre-existing warranties and new warranty obligations.


^(b)		Includes the impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

~~NOTE 11 — SEVERANCE AND FACILITY ACTIONS~~

During Fiscal 2010 and Fiscal 2009, Dell completed a series of individual cost reduction and facility exit activities designed to enhance operating efficiency and to reduce costs. Dell continued to incur costs related to these activities during the first and second quarters of Fiscal 2011. As of July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, the accruals related to these various cost reductions and efficiency actions were $53 million and $105 million, respectively, and are included in accrued and other liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position.

~~The following table sets forth the activity related to Dell’s severance and facility actions liability:~~

Three Months Ended
July 30, 2010 July 31, 2009
Severance
Facility
Severance
Facility

Costs Actions Total Costs Actions Total
(in millions)
Balance at the beginning of period $ 49 $ 30 $ 79 $ 173 $ 10 $ 183
Severance and facility charges to provision 12 - 12 62 4 66
Cash paid (32 ) (2 ) (34 ) (65 ) (1 ) (66 )
Other adjustments^(a)
(3 ) (1 ) (4 ) 4 1 5

Balance at the end of the period $ 26 $ 27 $ 53 $ 174 $ 14 $ 188

Six Months Ended
July 30, 2010 July 31, 2009
Severance
Facility
Severance
Facility

Costs Actions Total Costs Actions Total
(in millions)
Balance at the beginning of period $ 78 $ 27 $ 105 $ 88 $ 10 $ 98
Severance and facility charges to provision 32 7 39 237 4 241
Cash paid (80 ) (6 ) (86 ) (155 ) (1 ) (156 )
Other adjustments^(a)
(4 ) (1 ) (5 ) 4 1 5

Balance at the end of the period $ 26 $ 27 $ 53 $ 174 $ 14 $ 188


~~(a)~~		~~Other adjustments relate primarily to foreign currency translation adjustments.~~

~~Severance and facility action charges for the three and six months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009 are composed of the following:~~

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30,
July 31,
July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009
(in millions)
Severance and facility charges to provision $ 12 $ 66 $ 39 $ 241
Accelerated depreciation and other facility charges 12 21 42 31

Total severance and facility action costs $ 24 $ 87 $ 81 $ 272

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

Severance and facility action charges are included in cost of net revenue, selling, general and administrative expenses, and research, development, and engineering in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income as follows:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30,
July 31,
July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009
(in millions)
Severance and facility action costs:

Cost of revenue $ 14 $ 14 $ 43 $ 79
Selling, general, and administrative 9 71 34 191
Research, development, and engineering 1 2 4 2

Total severance and facility action costs $ 24 $ 87 $ 81 $ 272

NOTE 1211 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

~~Restricted Cash~~ — As of July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, Dell had restricted cash in the amount of $171 million and $147 million, respectively, included in other current assets. These balances primarily relate to an agreement between DFS and CIT Group Inc., which requires Dell to maintain escrow cash accounts that are held as recourse reserves for credit losses, performance fee deposits related to Dell’s private label credit card, and deferred servicing revenue, as well as amounts maintained in escrow accounts related to our recent acquisitions.

Legal Matters— Dell is involved in various claims, suits, assessments, investigations, and legal proceedings that arise from~~time-to-time~~ time to time in the ordinary course of its business, including those identified below, consisting of matters involving consumer, antitrust, tax, intellectual property, and other issues on a global basis.

Dell accrues a liability when it believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that it can reasonably estimate the amount of the loss. Dell reviews these accruals at least quarterly and adjusts them to reflect ongoing negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other relevant information. To the extent new information is obtained and Dell's views on the probable outcomes of claims, suits, assessments, investigations, or legal proceedings change, changes in Dell's accrued liabilities would be recorded in the period in which such determination is made. For some matters, the amount of liability is not probable or the amount cannot be reasonably estimated and therefore accruals have not been made. However, where a liability is reasonably possible and material, such matters have been disclosed. The following is a discussion of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's significant on-going legal matters and other proceedings:

~~Investigations~~SEC Investigation and Related ~~Litigation~~ —Settlements - In August 2005, the SEC initiated an inquiry into certain of ~~Dell’s~~Dell's accounting and financial reporting matters and requested that Dell provide certain documents. The SEC expanded that inquiry in June 2006 and entered a formal order of investigation in October 2006. In August 2006, because of potential issues identified in the course of responding to the ~~SEC’s~~SEC's requests for information, ~~Dell’s~~Dell's Audit Committee, on the recommendation of management and in consultation with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, ~~Dell’s~~Dell's independent registered public accounting firm, initiated an independent investigation into certain accounting and financial reporting matters, which was completed in the third quarter of Fiscal 2008. Dell subsequently restated its annual and interim financial statements for Fiscal 2003, Fiscal 2004, Fiscal 2005, Fiscal 2006, and the first quarter of Fiscal 2007.

On July 22, 2010, Dell reached a settlement with the SEC resolving the ~~SEC’s~~SEC's investigation into ~~Dell’s~~Dell's disclosures and alleged omissions prior to Fiscal 2008 regarding certain aspects of its commercial relationship with Intel Corporation (“Intel”) and into separate accounting and financial reporting matters. The SEC agreed to settlements with both the company and Michael Dell, who serves as the ~~company’s~~company's Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The company and Mr. Dell entered into the settlements without admitting or denying the allegations in the ~~SEC’s~~SEC's complaint, as is consistent with ~~standard~~common SEC practice.

Under its settlement, the company consented to a permanent injunction against future violations of antifraud provisions, non-scienter (negligence) based fraud provisions and other non-fraud based provisions related to reporting, the maintenance of accurate books and records, and internal accounting controls under Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”), Sections 10(b), 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

~~“Exchange~~ “Exchange Act”) andRules 10b-5, 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 under the Exchange Act. The company also agreed to perform, and has initiated, certain undertakings, including retaining and working with an independent consultant, to enhance its disclosure processes, practices and controls. Pursuant to the settlement terms, the company expects to have completed or implemented these undertakings within 36 months after court approval of the settlement on October 13, 2010. In addition, the company paid into an escrow account a civil monetary penalty of ~~$100~~$100 million and discharged the liability during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011.

The ~~SEC’s~~SEC's allegations with respect to Mr. Dell and his settlement ~~are~~were limited to the alleged failure to provide adequate disclosures with respect to the ~~company’s~~company's commercial relationship with Intel prior to Fiscal 2008. Mr. ~~Dell’s~~Dell's settlement ~~does~~did not involve any of the separate accounting fraud charges that were settled by the company. Moreover, Mr. ~~Dell’s~~Dell's settlement iswas limited to claims in which only negligence, and not fraudulent intent, is required to establish liability, as well as secondary liability claims for other non-fraud charges.

Under his settlement, Mr. Dell consented to a permanent injunction against future violations of these negligence-based provisions and other non-fraud based provisions related to periodic reporting. Specifically, Mr. Dell consented to be enjoined from violating Sections 17(a)(2) and (3) of the Securities Act andRule 13a-14 under the Exchange Act and from aiding and abetting violations of Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act andRules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 under the Exchange Act. In addition, Mr. Dell agreed to a civil monetary penalty of ~~$4 million.~~$4 million. The settlement does not include any restrictions on Mr. ~~Dell’s~~Dell's continued service as an officer or director of the company.

The independent directors of the Board of Directors unanimously ~~have~~ determined that it is in the best interests of Dell and its stockholders that Mr. Dell continue to serve as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the company.

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

The settlements with the company and Mr. Dell ~~are subject to approval~~were approved by the U.S. District Court for the District of ~~Columbia.~~Columbia on October 13, 2010.

Securities Litigation — - Four putative securities class actions filed between September 13, 2006, and January 31, 2007, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Austin Division, against Dell and certain of its current and former directors and officers were consolidated as In re Dell Securities Litigation, and a lead plaintiff was appointed by the court. The lead plaintiff asserted claims under Sections 10(b), 20(a), and 20A of the Exchange Act based on alleged false and misleading disclosures or omissions regarding ~~Dell’s~~Dell's financial statements, governmental investigations, internal controls, known battery problems and business model, and based on ~~insiders’~~insiders' sales of Dell securities. This action also included ~~Dell’s~~Dell's independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, as a defendant. On October 6, 2008, the court dismissed all of the ~~plaintiff’s~~plaintiff's claims with prejudice and without leave to amend. On November 3, 2008, the plaintiff appealed the dismissal of Dell and the officer defendants to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. The appeal was fully briefed, and oral argument on the appeal was heard by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals on September 1, 2009. On November 20, 2009, the parties to the appeal entered into a written settlement agreement whereby Dell would pay ~~$40~~$40 million to the proposed class and the plaintiff would dismiss the pending litigation. The settlement was preliminarily approved by the District Court on December 21, 2009. The settlement was subject to certain conditions, including opt-outs from the proposed class not exceeding a specified percentage and final approval by the District Court. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, the original opt-out period in the notice approved by the District Court expired without the specified percentage being exceeded. The District Court subsequently granted final approval for the settlement and entered a final judgment on July 20, 2010. Dell paid ~~$40~~$40 million into an escrow account to satisfy this settlement and discharged the liability during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. Certain objectors to the settlement have filed notices of appeal to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals with regard to approval of the settlement. While there can be no assurances with respect to litigation, ~~we believe~~Dell believes it is unlikely that the settlement will be overturned on appeal.

Copyright Levies - In many European Union (“EU”) member countries, there are requirements to collect and remit levies to collecting societies based on sales of certain devices. These levies apply to Dell and others in the industry. The amount of levies is generally based upon the number of products sold and the per-product amounts of the levies. Levies are intended to compensate copyright holders for “fair use” copying of copyrighted materials. The collecting societies then distribute the levies to copyright holders. Some EU member countries that do not yet have levies on digital devices are expected to implement similar legislation to enable them to extend existing levy schemes, while some other EU member countries are expected to limit the scope of levy schemes and their applicability in the digital hardware environment. Dell, other companies and various industry associations have opposed the extension of levies to the digital environment and have advocated alternative models of compensation to rights holders. As described below, there are multiple proceedings involving Dell or its competitors in certain EU member countries, where plaintiffs are seeking to impose or modify levies upon equipment (such as multifunction devices, phones, personal computers (“PCs”) and printers), alleging that these devices enable copying of copyrighted materials. Even if Dell is not a party to all these proceedings, the decisions could impact Dell's business and the amount of copyright levies Dell may be required to collect. These various proceedings also challenge whether the levy schemes in those countries comply with EU law.

There are multiple proceedings in Germany that could impact Dell's obligation to collect and remit levies in Germany. In July 2004, VG Wort, a German collecting society, filed a lawsuit against Hewlett-Packard Company (“HP”) in the Stuttgart Civil Court seeking copyright levies on printers. On December 22, 2004, the court held that HP was liable for payments regarding all printers using ASCII code sold in Germany. HP appealed the decision and after an intermediary ruling upholding the trial court's decision, the German Federal Supreme Court (“GFSC”) in December 2007 issued a judgment that printers are not subject to levies under the German copyright law that was in effect until December 31, 2007. Based upon the GFSC's ruling, Dell concluded there was no obligation for Dell to collect or accrue levies for printers sold by it prior to December 31, 2007. VG Wort filed a claim with the German Constitutional Court (“GCC”) challenging the GFSC's ruling that printers are not subject to levies. On September 21, 2010, the GCC revoked the GFSC decision and referred the case back to the GFSC to determine if the ruling gave due credit to the copyright owner's property rights under the German Constitution and whether the GFSC should have referred the case to the European Court of Justice (“ECJ”). The GFSC has indicated it will issue its decision in this case in July 2011. Dell believes that the GFSC can decide to refer the case to the ECJ, confirm its prior decision, or conclude that printers are subject to levies under German law. Dell has not accrued any liability in this matter, as Dell does not believe there is a probable and estimable claim.

Table of Contents

DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

Similarly, in September 2003, VG Wort filed a lawsuit against Fujitsu Siemens Computer GmbH ("FSC") in the Munich Civil Court in Munich, Germany seeking levies on PCs. On December 23, 2004, the Munich Civil Court held that PCs are subject to a levy and that FSC must pay €12 plus compound interest for each PC sold in Germany since March 2001. FSC appealed this decision and after an intermediary ruling upholding the decision, the GFSC in October 2008 issued a judgment that PCs were not photocopiers within the meaning of the German copyright law that was in effect until December 31, 2007 and, therefore, not subject to the levies on photocopiers established by that law. VG Wort filed a claim with the GCC challenging that ruling. In January 2011, as in the HP case above, the GCC revoked the GFSC decision and referred the case back to the GFSC to determine if the ruling gave due credit to the copyright owner's property rights under the German Constitution and whether the GFSC should have referred the case to the European Court of Justice. Dell believes that the GFSC can decide to refer the case to the ECJ, confirm its prior decision, or conclude that PCs are subject to levies under German law. Dell has not accrued any liability in this matter, as Dell does not believe there is a probable and estimable claim.
In a separate matter, on December 29, 2005, Zentralstelle Für private Überspielungrechte (“ZPÜ”), a joint association of various German collecting societies, instituted arbitration proceedings against Dell's German subsidiary before the Board of Arbitration at the German Patent and Trademark Office in Munich, and subsequently filed a lawsuit in the German Regional Court in Munich on February 21, 2008, seeking levies to be paid on each PC sold by Dell in Germany through the end of calendar year 2007. On December 23, 2009, ZPÜ and the German industry association, BCH, reached a settlement regarding audio-video copyright levy litigation (with levies ranging from €3.15 to €13.65 per unit). Dell joined this settlement on February 23, 2010 and has paid the amounts due thereunder. However, because the settlement agreement expired on December 31, 2010, the amount of levies payable after calendar year 2010, as well as Dell's ability to recover such amounts through increased prices, remain uncertain.
Additionally, there are proceedings in Spain to which Dell is not a party, but that could impact Dell's obligation to collect and remit levies across the EU. In March 2006, Sociedad General de Autores y Editores de Espana (“SGAE”), a Spanish collecting society, sued Padawan SL ("Padawan"), a company unaffiliated with Dell, in the Commercial Court number four of Barcelona in Spain claiming that Padawan owed levies on the CD-Rs, CD-RWs, DVD-Rs, and MP3 players sold by Padawan. In June 2007, the trial court upheld SGAE's claim and ordered Padawan to pay specified levies. Padawan appealed the decision to the Audiencia Provincial de Barcelona, which stayed the proceedings in order to refer the case to the ECJ. The ECJ considered the interpretation of the term “fair compensation” under the European Copyright Directive (“Directive”). On October 21, 2010, the ECJ issued its decision and outlined how fair compensation should be considered under the Directive by the EU member states. The ECJ stated that fair compensation must be calculated based on the harm caused to the authors of protected works by private copying. The ECJ also stated that the indiscriminate application of the private copying levy to devices not made available to private users and clearly reserved for uses other than private copying is incompatible with the Directive. The matter was referred back to the Spanish court to determine whether the Spanish copyright levy scheme is compatible with the Directive based on the guidance provided by the ECJ. And in March 2011, the Appeals Court of Barcelona decided in the industry's favor, noting that the indiscriminate payment of copyright levies does not comply with EU law. The case can be appealed to the Supreme Court of Spain. It is unclear at this time what the effect of this decision will be on copyright levies in Spain and the other EU member states. Dell continues to collect and remit levies in Spain and other EU countries where it has determined that based on local law it is probable that Dell has an obligation.
The ultimate resolution of these matters and the associated financial impact to Dell, if any, including the number of units potentially affected, the amount of levies imposed, and the ability of Dell to recover such amounts remains uncertain at this time. Should the courts determine there is liability for previous units shipped beyond what Dell has collected or accrued, Dell would be liable for such incremental amounts. Recovery would only be possible on future collections related to future shipments.
Sharp Corporation v Dell Inc. - Sharp Corporation (“Sharp”) filed a suit against Dell in October 2008 for trademark infringement, unfair competition and dilution in the U.S. District Court in the State of New Jersey. Sharp alleges that it is the owner of the “SHARP” mark and that this mark and related marks are used in connection with Sharp's sale of a wide variety of electrical and consumer electronic products. Sharp alleges that Dell has infringed the “SHARP” mark by using the “UltraSharp” and “Dell UltraSharp” marks to promote, advertise and sell computer monitors and notebook computers, from 2002 to the present. Sharp alleges that Dell's use of “UltraSharp” has and will continue to

22
Table of Contents
DELL INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)

cause actual consumer confusion regarding the source of “UltraSharp.” In addition, Sharp has asserted a claim for dilution of its SHARP marks on the alleged ground that Dell's use of DELL UltraSharp and UltraSharp has weakened the distinctive value of its marks. Sharp seeks damages measured by Dell's profits made from the sale of DELL UltraSharp products, treble damages, punitive damages, costs and attorneys' fees. Sharp also seeks a permanent injunction precluding the use of Dell's allegedly infringing “UltraSharp” mark. Dell disputes the claims and is vigorously defending the case. Trial in this matter is currently scheduled for June 2011. The ultimate resolution of this matter and the associated financial impact to Dell, if any, remains uncertain at this time.
Chad Brazil and Steven Seick v Dell Inc. - Chad Brazil and Steven Seick filed a class action suit against Dell in March 2007 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. The plaintiffs allege that Dell advertised discounts on its products from false “regular” prices, in violation of California law. The plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, disgorgement of profits from the alleged false advertising, injunctive relief, punitive damages and attorneys' fees. In December 2010, the District Court certified a class consisting of all California residents who had purchased certain products advertised with a former sales price on the consumer segment of Dell's website during an approximately four year period between March 2003 and June 2007. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, the plaintiffs and Dell reached a classwide settlement in principle regarding the dispute on terms that are not material to the company, however, the settlement is still subject to submission and approval by the District Court.
Convolve Inc. v Dell Inc. - Convolve, Inc. sued Dell, Western Digital Corporation (“Western Digital”), Hitachi Global Storage Technologies, Inc., and Hitachi Ltd. (collectively “Hitachi”) on June 18, 2008 in the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division, alleging that the defendants infringe United States Patent No. 4,916,635 (entitled “Shaping Command Inputs to Minimize Unwanted Dynamics”) and United States Patent No. 6,314,473 (entitled “System for Removing Selected Unwanted Frequencies in Accordance with Altered Settings in a User Interface of a Data Storage Device”). Western Digital and Hitachi are hard drive suppliers of Dell. This case is scheduled to go to trial in July 2011. Plaintiff seeks damages for each product with an allegedly infringing hard drive sold by Dell, plus exemplary damages for allegedly willful infringement. Dell disputes the plaintiff's damages calculations and also disputes the validity of the patents. Dell further disputes that it infringes the patents, and will assert all of these defenses at trial. The ultimate resolution of this matter and the associated financial impact to Dell, if any, remain uncertain at this time.

Other Litigation — - The various legal proceedings in which Dell is involved include commercial litigation and a variety of patent suits. In some of these cases, Dell is the sole defendant. More often, particularly ~~with~~in the patent suits, Dell is one of a number of defendants in the electronics and technology industries. Dell is actively defending a number of patent infringement suits, and several pending claims are in various stages of evaluations. While the number of patent cases has grown over time, ~~we do~~Dell does not currently anticipate that any of these matters will have a material ~~impact~~adverse effect on ~~Dell’s~~Dell's business, financial condition, or results of ~~operation.~~

~~Other Matters~~ — Dell recently became aware of instances in which certain peripheral product sales made to U.S. federal government customers under Dell’s General Services Administration (“GSA”) Schedule 70 Contract were not compliant with contract requirements implementing the Trade Agreements Act. Dell is currently investigating the matter and has self-reported the discovery to GSA’s Office of the Inspector General. Non-compliance could lead to contract claims; termination for default; civiloperations, or criminal penalties; double or treble damages; and possibly debarment or suspension from sales to the U.S. federal government. The matter is in the preliminary stages and Dell cannot currently predict the resolution of this matter. No liabilities have been recorded as Dell is currently unable to estimate any potential liability at this time.

cash flows.

While Dell does not expect that the ultimate outcomes in these proceedings or matters, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on its business, financial position, results of operations, or cash flows, the results and timing of the ultimate resolutions of these various proceedings and matters are inherently unpredictable. Whether the outcome of any claim, suit, assessment, investigation, or legal proceeding, individually or collectively, could have a material adverse effect on ~~Dell’s~~Dell's business, financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows will depend on a number of variables, including the nature, timing, and amount of any associated expenses, amounts paid in settlement, damages or other remedies or consequences. ~~Dell accrues a liability when it believes that it is both probable that a liability has been incurred and that it can reasonably estimate the amount~~

Table of the loss. Dell reviews these accruals at least quarterly and adjusts them to reflect ongoing negotiations, settlements, rulings, advice of legal counsel, and other relevant information. To the extent new information is obtained and Dell’s views on the probable outcomes of claims, suits, assessments, investigations, or legal proceedings change, changes in Dell’s accrued liabilities would be recorded in the period in which such determination is made.Contents

DELL INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)

(unaudited)

NOTE 1312 — COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

The following table summarizes comprehensive income for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011 and April 30, ~~2010, and July 31, 2009:~~

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30,
July 31,
July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009
(in millions)
Comprehensive income

Net income $ 545 $ 472 $ 886 $ 762
Change related to hedging instruments, net (127 ) (119 ) (114 ) (477 )
Change related to marketable securities, net (1 ) 3 (2 ) 3
Foreign currency translation adjustments (8 ) (26 ) 26 (34 )

Comprehensive income $ 409 $ 330 $ 796 $ 254

~~DELL INC.~~
2010:

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011			April 30, 2010
Comprehensive Income	(in millions)
Net Income	$	945		$	341
Change related to hedging instruments, net	(68		)	13
Change related to marketable securities, net	—			(1		)
Foreign currency translation adjustments	74			34
Comprehensive Income	$	951		$	387

NOTE 1413 — INCOME AND OTHER TAXES

~~Dell’s~~Dell's effective income tax rate was ~~21.7%~~19.2% and 24.4% for the ~~second quarter~~first quarters of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 and ~~22.8% for the six months ended July 30, 2010, as compared to 25.0% and 26.8% for the three months and six months ended July 31, 2009,~~Fiscal 2011, respectively. The year-over-year decrease in ~~Dell’s~~Dell's effective income tax rate for the ~~three and six months ended July 30, 2010,~~first quarter of Fiscal 2012, was primarily ~~due~~attributable to an increase in the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, as compared to the ~~favorable effective settlement~~first quarter of ~~a tax audit~~Fiscal 2011, in ~~a foreign jurisdiction, finalization of certain advanced pricing agreements with foreign jurisdictions, and also Dell’s geographical distribution~~the proportion of taxable ~~income.~~income attributable to lower tax jurisdictions. The differences between the estimated effective income tax rates and the U.S. federal statutory rate of ~~35%~~35.0% principally ~~resulted~~result from ~~Dell’s~~Dell's geographical distribution of taxable income and differences between the book and tax treatment of certain items. The income tax rate for future quarters of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 will be impacted by the actual mix of jurisdictions in which income is generated.

Dell is currently under income tax audits in various jurisdictions, including the United States. The tax periods open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions to which Dell is subject include fiscal years 1997 through ~~2010.~~2011. As a result of these audits, Dell maintains ongoing discussions and negotiations relating to tax matters with the taxing authorities in these various jurisdictions. ~~Dell’s~~Dell's U.S. federal income tax returns for fiscal years 2007 through 2009 are currently under ~~examination. The~~examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) ~~has~~. The IRS issued a Revenue ~~Agent’s~~Agent's Report for fiscal years 2004 through 2006 proposing certain assessments primarily related to transfer pricing matters. Dell disagrees with certain of the proposed assessments and has contested them through the IRS administrative appeals procedures. ~~Since March 2010, three meetings between Dell and~~The IRS has recently remanded the ~~IRS Appeals Division have been held. Dell anticipates that~~audit for the ~~appeals process will involve additional meetings and could take an extended period of time~~tax years 2004 through 2006 back to ~~resolve.~~examination for further review. Dell believes that it has provided adequate reserves related to all matters contained in tax periods open to examination. However, should Dell experience an unfavorable outcome in the IRS matter, such an outcome could have a material impact on its results of operations, financial position, and cash flows. Although the timing of income tax audit resolutions and negotiations with taxing authorities is highly uncertain, Dell does not anticipate a significant change to the total amount of unrecognized income tax benefits ~~for all matters~~ within the next 12 months.

Dell takes certain non-income tax positions in the jurisdictions in which it operates and has received certain non-income tax assessments from various jurisdictions. These jurisdictions include Brazil, where Dell is in litigation with a state government over the proper application of transactional taxes to warranties related to the sale of computers. Dell has also negotiated certain tax incentives with the state that can be used to offset potential tax liabilities should the courts rule against it. The incentives are based upon the number of jobs Dell maintains within the state. Dell is currently on appeal for this case and has pledged its manufacturing facility in Hortolandia, Brazil to the government. Dell does not expect the outcome of this case to have a material impact to its consolidated financial statements.

Dell believes its positions in these non-income tax litigation matters are supportable, that a liability is not probable, and that it will ultimately prevail. In the normal course of business, ~~Dell’s~~Dell's positions and conclusions related to its non-income taxes could be challenged and assessments may be made. To the extent new information is obtained and ~~Dell’s~~Dell's views on its positions, probable outcomes of assessments, or litigation change, changes in estimates to ~~Dell’s~~Dell's accrued liabilities would be recorded in the period in which such determination is made.

Table of Contents
DELL INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)

NOTE 1514 — EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted-average effect of all common shares issued and outstanding and is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming exercise or conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding. Dell excludes equity instruments from the calculation of diluted earnings per share if the effect of including such instruments is anti-dilutive. Accordingly, certain stock-based incentive awards have been excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share totaling ~~203~~167 million ~~shares~~ and ~~232~~204 million common shares for the ~~second~~first quarters of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 and Fiscal ~~2010, respectively; and 203 million and 239 million shares for the six months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009,~~2011, respectively.

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011, and April 30, 2010 ~~and July 31, 2009:~~:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30,
July 31,
July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009
(in millions, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income $ 545 $ 472 $ 886 $ 762

Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic 1,952 1,955 1,956 1,952
Effect of dilutive options, restricted stock units, restricted stock, and other 8 5 11 4

Diluted 1,960 1,960 1,967 1,956

Earnings per share:
Basic $ 0.28 $ 0.24 $ 0.45 $ 0.39
Diluted $ 0.28 $ 0.24 $ 0.45 $ 0.39



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011		April 30, 2010
	(in millions, except per share amounts)
Numerator:
Net income	$	945	$	341
Denominator:
Weighted-average shares outstanding:
Basic	1,908		1,961
Effect of dilutive options, restricted stock units, restricted stock, and other	15		12
Diluted	1,923		1,973
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.50	$	0.17
Diluted	$	0.49	$	0.17

25
Table of Contents
DELL INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(unaudited)

NOTE 1615 — SEGMENT INFORMATION

~~Dell’s~~Dell's four global business segments are Large Enterprise, Public, Small and Medium Business (“SMB”), and Consumer. Large Enterprise includes sales of IT infrastructure and service solutions to large global and national corporate customers. Public includes sales to educational institutions, governments, health care organizations, and law enforcement agencies, among others. SMB includes sales of complete IT solutions to small and medium-sized businesses. Consumer includes sales to individual consumers and retailers around the world.

The business segments disclosed in the accompanying Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements are based on this organizational structure and information reviewed by ~~Dell’s~~Dell's management to evaluate the business segment results. ~~Dell’s~~Dell's measure of segment operating income for management reporting purposes excludes severance and facility closure expenses, broad based long-term incentives, acquisition-related charges, amortization of intangibles, ~~acquisition-related charges,~~ and the settlements for the SEC investigation as well as the securities litigation class action lawsuit that were incurred during the first quarter of Fiscal 2011.

~~DELL INC.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)~~

~~(unaudited)~~

The following table presents net revenue by ~~Dell’s~~Dell's reportable global segments as well as a reconciliation of consolidated segment operating income to ~~Dell’s~~Dell's consolidated operating income:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30,
July 31,
July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009
(in millions)
Net revenue:

Large Enterprise $ 4,549 $ 3,285 $ 8,795 $ 6,685
Public 4,580 3,798 8,436 6,969
Small and Medium Business 3,535 2,820 7,059 5,787
Consumer 2,870 2,861 6,118 5,665

Net revenue $ 15,534 $ 12,764 $ 30,408 $ 25,106

Consolidated operating income:

Large Enterprise $ 288 $ 172 $ 571 $ 364
Public 369 383 667 676
Small and Medium Business 323 246 636 476
Consumer (21 ) 89 (4 ) 88

Consolidated segment operating income 959 890 1,870 1,604

Severance and facility actions (24 ) (87 ) (81 ) (272 )
Broad based long-term incentives^(a)
(87 ) (92 ) (174 ) (168 )
Amortization of intangible assets (87 ) (40 ) (175 ) (79 )
Acquisition-related costs^(b)
(16 ) - (36 ) -
Other^(c)
- - (140 ) -

Consolidated operating income $ 745 $ 671 $ 1,264 $ 1,085



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011			April 30, 2010
	(in millions)
Net revenue:
Large Enterprise	$	4,477		$	4,246
Public	3,767			3,856
Small and Medium Business	3,768			3,524
Consumer	3,005			3,248
Total	$	15,017		$	14,874
Consolidated operating income:
Large Enterprise	$	504		$	283
Public	370			298
Small and Medium Business	463			313
Consumer	136			17
Consolidated segment operating income	1,473			911
Severance and facility actions	(19		)	(57		)
Broad based long-term incentives^(a)	(97		)	(87		)
Amortization of intangible assets	(92		)	(88		)
Acquisition-related costs^(a)(b)	(53		)	(20		)
Other^(c)	—			(140		)
Total	$	1,212		$	519

____________________


(a)		Broad based, long-term incentives ~~include~~includes stock-based compensation, ~~and other long-term incentives that~~but excludes stock-based compensation related to acquisitions, which are ~~not allocated to Dell’s global segments.~~included in acquisition-related costs.


(b)		Acquisition-related ~~charges~~costs consist primarily of retention payments, integration costs, and ~~consulting fees.~~other costs.


(c)		Other includes the ~~$100~~$100 million settlement for the SEC investigation and a ~~$40~~$40 million settlement for a securities litigation ~~lawsuit.~~lawsuit that were both incurred in the first quarter of Fiscal 2011.

~~NOTE 17 — SUBSEQUENT EVENT~~

~~In August 2010, Dell made an offer to acquire 3Par Inc. (“3PAR”), a global provider~~26

Table of storage solutions optimized for the cloud environment. The acquisition of 3PAR is anticipated to enhance Dell’s storage portfolio and provide Dell’s customers with solutions at every storage tier. Subsequent to Dell’s offer to acquire, 3PAR received a competing offer and Dell responded by increasing its original offer to approximately $1.6 billion, net of 3PAR’s cash. Dell cannot predict the outcome of this matter at this time.Contents

ITEM 2.2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~SPECIAL NOTE:~~ All percentage amounts and ratios were calculated using the underlying data in thousands. Our fiscal year is the 52 or 53 week period ending on the Friday nearest January 31. Unless the context indicates otherwise, references in this management’s discussion and analysis to “we,” “us,” “our” and “Dell” mean Dell Inc. and our consolidated subsidiaries. This management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended January ~~29, 2010,~~28, 2011, and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in that report.

~~OVERVIEW~~

INTRODUCTION

We are a leading integrated technology solutions provider in the IT industry. We built our reputation through listening to customers and developing solutions that meet customer needs. We are focused on providing long-term value creation through the delivery of customized solutions that make technology more efficient, more accessible, and ~~easy~~easier to use. Customer needs are increasingly being defined by how ~~customers~~they use technology rather than where they use it, which is why our businesses are globally organized. Our four global business segments are Large Enterprise, Public, Small and Medium Business (“SMB”), and Consumer. We also refer to our Large Enterprise, Public, and SMB segments as “Commercial.” Our globally organized business units reflect the impact of globalization on our customer base.

We are committed to delivering efficient and flexible IT solutions for the virtual era. Our focus is on three key solutions domains:

Next generation computing solutions and intelligent data management

Services, security and cloud computing, and

End user computing

Next generation computing solutions, intelligent data management, services, security and cloud computing are all part of our enterprise solutions and services business, which has contributed to improvements in our operating margins in recent quarters. Our enterprise solutions products include servers, ~~and~~ networking, and storage ~~products. Client~~ products and our services are grouped into three categories based on similar demand, economic and delivery profiles: transactional; outsourcing; and project-based. We are also focused on end user computing by developing higher valued capabilities for our client products, which include our mobility and desktop PC products. ~~Our services include~~We have been focusing on improving the profitability of our client products by creating a ~~broad range~~flexible value chain to improve execution and we will continue to focus on simplifying our product offerings. The majority of ~~configurable~~our products are now produced by contract manufacturers. We believe developing flexible and efficient IT solutions will provide higher recurring revenue streams and ~~business services, including infrastructure technology, consulting and applications, and business process services.~~margin opportunities over time.

~~Our recent~~We supplement organic growth with a disciplined acquisition ~~of Kace Networks, Inc, Scalent Systems Inc., and Ocarina Networks Inc., and our continued integration of Perot Systems Corporation (“Perot Systems”) have enabled us to~~program targeting businesses that will expand our portfolio of enterprise solutions and services offerings. ~~The comparability~~We emphasize acquisitions of companies with portfolios that we can leverage with our global customer base and distribution. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, we acquired Compellent Technologies, Inc. ("Compellent"), a global provider of virtual storage solutions for enterprise and cloud computing environments, and SecureWorks Inc. ("SecureWorks"), a global provider of information security services. See Note 8 - Acquisitions in Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Part I — Item 1 — Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for additional information about our acquisitions. In addition, during the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, we announced our intent to acquire Dell Financial Services Canada Limited, a CIT Vendor Finance and Dell partnership, as well as CIT Vendor Finance's Dell-related assets and sales and servicing functions in Europe.

Presentation of Supplemental Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In this management's discussion and analysis, we use supplemental measures of our performance, which are derived from our consolidated financial information but which are not presented in our consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). These financial measures, which are considered “non-GAAP financial measures” under SEC rules, include our non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP net income, and non-GAAP earnings per share. See “Results of Operations — Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for information about our use of these non-GAAP financial measures, including our reasons for including the measures, material limitations with respect to the usefulness of the measures, and a reconciliation of each non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Consolidated Operations

The following table summarizes our consolidated results of operations for the ~~second quarter~~three months ended April 29, 2011, and ~~first six months~~April 30, 2010:



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011						April 30, 2010
	Dollars		% of Revenue		% Change		Dollars		% of Revenue
	(in millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
Net revenue:
Products	$	12,059	80.3	%	—	%	$	12,086	81.3	%
Services, including software related	2,958		19.7	%	6	%	2,788		18.7	%
Total net revenue	$	15,017	100.0	%	1	%	$	14,874	100	%
Gross margin:
Products	$	2,623	21.8	%	54	%	$	1,701	14.1	%
Services, including software related	809		27.3	%	(1	)%	815		29.2	%
Total gross margin	$	3,432	22.9	%	36	%	$	2,516	16.9	%
Operating expenses	$	2,220	14.8	%	11	%	$	1,997	13.4	%
Operating income	$	1,212	8.1	%	134	%	$	519	3.5	%
Net income	$	945	6.3	%	177	%	$	341	2.3	%
Earnings per share — diluted	$	0.49	N/A		188	%	$	0.17	N/A

Other Financial Information ^(a)
Non-GAAP gross margin	$	3,511	23.4	%	34	%	$	2,614	17.6	%
Non-GAAP operating expenses	$	2,135	14.2	%	19	%	$	1,790	12.0	%
Non-GAAP operating income	$	1,376	9.2	%	67	%	$	824	5.5	%
Non-GAAP net income	$	1,050	7.0	%	80	%	$	584	3.9	%
Non-GAAP earnings per share - diluted	$	0.55	N/A		83	%	$	0.30	N/A

_____________________

(a)Non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP net income, and non-GAAP earnings per share are not measurements of ~~Fiscal 2011 compared~~financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. See “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below for information about these non-GAAP financial measures, including our reasons for including the ~~same periods in Fiscal 2010 are impacted by~~measures, material limitations with respect to the ~~acquisitions we have made since~~usefulness of the ~~second~~measures, and a reconciliation of each non-GAAP financial measure to the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure.

Overview

For the first quarter of Fiscal 2010, primarily Perot Systems. See our Services discussion under “Revenue by Product and Services Categories” below for a comparison of Dell’s services revenue for the first half of Fiscal 2011 to the prior year’s results of Dell services and Perot Systems.

~~CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

~~The following table summarizes the results of our operations for the three and six months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009:~~

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30, 2010 July 31, 2009 July 30, 2010 July 31, 2009
% of
%
% of
% of
%
% of
Dollars Revenue Change Dollars Revenue Dollars Revenue Change Dollars Revenue
(in millions, except per share amounts and percentages)
Net revenue
Products $ 12,645 81.4% 19% $ 10,623 83.2% $ 24,731 81.3% 19% $ 20,855 83.1%
Services, including software related 2,889 18.6% 35% 2,141 16.8% 5,677 18.7% 34% 4,251 16.9%

Total net revenue $ 15,534 100.0% 22% $ 12,764 100.0% $ 30,408 100.0% 21% $ 25,106 100.0%
Gross margin
Products $ 1,714 13.6% 4% $ 1,645 15.5% $ 3,415 13.8% 10% $ 3,091 14.8%
Services, including software related 872 30.2% 17% 746 34.8% 1,687 29.7% 15% 1,468 34.5%

Total gross margin $ 2,586 16.6% 8% $ 2,391 18.7% $ 5,102 16.8% 12% $ 4,559 18.2%
Operating expenses $ 1,841 11.8% 7% $ 1,720 13.5% $ 3,838 12.6% 10% $ 3,474 13.8%
Operating income $ 745 4.8% 11% $ 671 5.2% $ 1,264 4.2% 16% $ 1,085 4.3%
Net income $ 545 3.5% 16% $ 472 3.7% $ 886 2.9% 16% $ 762 3.0%
Earnings per share diluted $ 0.28 N/A 17% $ 0.24 N/A $ 0.45 N/A 15% $ 0.39 N/A

~~In the second quarter of Fiscal 2011,~~2012, our total net revenue increased ~~22%~~1% year-over-year with slight increases ~~across all~~in our ~~Commercial~~Large Enterprise and SMB segments ~~while~~largely offset by decreases in our Public and Consumer segments. The net revenue ~~remained flat. Revenue from~~of our Commercial segments increased ~~28%~~3% year-over-year, ~~with Large Enterprise~~ and ~~SMB leading the increase. Our Commercial segments generated~~represented approximately ~~82%~~80% of our total net revenue ~~during~~for the ~~second~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011. We continue to see indications of strengthening~~2012. The recovery in the economy during recent quarters helped maintain demand ~~primarily~~ from our Large Enterprise and SMB customers ~~due to~~as the corporate refresh cycle ~~that is being experienced across~~continued. Our Public customers continue to be challenged by budgetary constraints on public spending, particularly in the ~~industry, while demand~~U.S. and European regions. Demand from our ~~Public and~~ Consumer customers ~~is showing signs of softening. For~~softened in the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2011,~~2012, though profitability improved.

Our consolidated operating income increased 134% year-over-year, and all our ~~total net revenue increased 21%, with revenue~~segments reported increases in operating income. Operating income from our Commercial segments increased 50%, while Consumer operating income increased from $17 million to $136 million. The improved profitability of our Commercial business was largely driven by significant margin improvements from our client products, which include mobility and desktop products. Our Commercial segments also saw improved margin percentages for our enterprise solutions products, which include our servers, networking, and storage offerings. Our Consumer ~~segments increasing 25% and 8%, respectively,year-over-year~~ ~~for the same period.~~

segment experienced improved profitability primarily from our client products. We will ~~continue to focus~~remain focused on profitability by continuing our efforts ~~on providing~~to provide IT solutions to our customers in areas such as ~~servers~~enterprise solutions and ~~networking, storage,~~services, and ~~services. The revenue generated from these categories of~~will continue to utilize our ~~Commercial segments, including~~flexible supply chain and pricing discipline in seeking to enhance the ~~contributions from Perot Systems, grew a combined 43% and 42%year-over-year,~~ during the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, respectively. We believe these solutions are customized to the needs of users, easy to use, and affordable. We will also seek to improve our client product business by simplifying our product offerings, developing next generation capabilities, and enhancing the online buying experience for our customers. Our cost reduction activities over the past several quarters are improving our profitability ~~and operating leverage as revenue growth returns. We expect that the benefits of our strategy will carry throughout Fiscal 2011.~~

~~Revenue~~28

Table of Contents

of all our products.

Revenue

Product Revenue — Product revenue ~~increased~~was flat year-over-year ~~by 19%~~ for the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and first half~~ of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. Our product revenue performance was ~~primarily~~ attributable to ~~improved~~softening customer demand, ~~as result~~particularly for our Public and Consumer segments. See "Revenue by Product and Services Categories" for further information regarding the average selling prices of ~~increased global IT spending from~~ our ~~Commercial customers across all product categories.~~products.

Services Revenue, including software related— Services revenue, including software related increasedyear-over-year by ~~35%~~6% for the ~~second~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011 and 34% for the first half of Fiscal 2011.~~2012. Our services revenue performance was attributable to a ~~57%~~5% year-over-year increase in services revenue and an increase of 6%9% in software related services revenue ~~during~~for the ~~second~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011. For~~2012.

During the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2011, services and software related services~~2012, revenue ~~increased 55% and 4%, respectively. The increase in services revenue was primarily due to our acquisition of Perot Systems, which was integrated into our Public and Large Enterprise segments.~~

~~Revenue~~ from the U.S. ~~increased 17%~~decreased 5% to $7.4 billion and ~~19% during the second quarter and first half~~represented 49% of ~~Fiscal 2011, respectively, over the same periods last year.~~total net revenue. Revenue from outside the U.S. increased 7% to $7.6 billion and represented ~~approximately 47%~~51% of total net revenue. Non-U.S. revenue ~~for the second quarter~~excluding Western Europe, Canada and ~~first half~~Japan grew 17% year-over-year to 27% of ~~Fiscal 2011, and grew 28% and 24%year-over-year~~ ~~for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, respectively.~~total net revenue. Revenue from Brazil, Russia, India, and China, ~~(“BRIC”)~~which we refer to as "BRIC," increased ~~52% and 56%~~18% year-over-year, on a combined basis, for the ~~second quarter and~~ first ~~half of Fiscal 2011, respectively. Revenue from BRIC combined has been increasing sequentially since the fourth~~ quarter of Fiscal ~~2009~~2012. The increase in revenue from BRIC was driven by sales in China and ~~represented 12.0%~~India, while revenue from Russia and Brazil has softened in comparison to prior quarters. Total revenue from BRIC increased to 14% of our total net revenue for the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2011 compared to 9.4% in~~2012 over 12% for the prior year. We are continuing to expand into these and other emerging countries that represent the vast majority of the ~~world’s~~world's population, tailor solutions to meet specific regional needs, and enhance relationships to provide customer choice and flexibility.

We manage our business on a U.S. dollar basis and utilize a comprehensive hedging strategy intended to mitigate the impact of foreign currency volatility over time. As a result of our hedging programs, the impact of currency movements was not material to our total net revenue for the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and first half~~ of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012.

~~Gross Margin~~Japan

On March 11, 2011, the northeast region of Japan sustained extensive damage from a severe earthquake and tsunami that has impacted Japan's infrastructure as well as its economy. We do not have any manufacturing facilities in Japan and our operations have not been significantly affected by the damage. Revenue from Japan represented less than 5% of our total net revenue for Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010 and was not significantly impacted by the event for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012. Although certain components used in our products are produced by Japanese manufacturers, our preliminary assessment indicates that our supply chain to date has not been significantly impacted by this event. We will continue to monitor the situation.

Gross Margin

Products — During the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and first half~~ of Fiscal ~~2011, products~~2012, our product gross ~~margin~~margins increased in absolute dollarsyear-over-year ~~while~~ and in gross margin percentage. Product gross margin percentage decreased 190 basis points and 100 basis points, respectively. The decrease in gross margin percentage was primarily a result of component cost pressures that we were not able to completely offset through pricing actions. Our client products were particularly impacted by this trend. Late inincreased from 14.1% for the ~~second~~first quarter of Fiscal 2011 ~~we observed indications~~to 21.8% for the first quarter of ~~moderating~~Fiscal 2012. Decreasing component ~~cost trends, which, depending on~~costs, improved pricing discipline, better sales and supply chain execution, and a shift in mix to more differentiated products with higher margins contributed to the ~~pricing environment, may provide for~~year-over-year increase in product gross margin ~~improvement~~percentage for all our segments. We have created a flexible supply chain that has improved our supply chain execution and we have simplified our product offerings. Additionally, in the second half of Fiscal ~~2011.~~2011, we began to benefit from decreasing component costs, particularly for memory and displays. We expect that this favorable component cost environment will moderate in the second and third quarters of Fiscal 2012.

Services, including software related — During the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and first half~~ of Fiscal ~~2011,~~2012, our services gross margin ~~increased~~decreased in absolute dollars ~~compared to the prior year, though our~~and in gross margin percentage ~~decreased. The decrease in~~from the first quarter of Fiscal 2011. Services gross margin ~~percentage~~decreased from 29.2% for the first quarter of Fiscal 2011 to 27.3% for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012. Our gross margin rate for services, including software related, ~~was primarily due to a higher mix of stand-alone services. Our services, including software related gross margin rate~~ is driven by our transactional services, which consist primarily of our extended warranty sales, ~~the total effect of which was~~ offset by lower margin categories such as ~~software, consulting,~~outsourcing and ~~managed~~project-related services. ~~Our extended warranty~~The year-over-year decrease in services ~~are more profitable because we sell extended warranty offerings directly~~gross margin was driven by decreases in gross margin percentage from transaction and project-based services due to ~~customers instead~~temporary cost pressures.

Total gross margin for the first quarter of ~~selling through~~Fiscal 2012 increased 36% to $3.4 billion on a ~~distribution channel. We have~~GAAP basis and 34% to $3.5 billion on a ~~service support structure that allows us to favorably manage our fixed costs.~~

~~We will continue to invest in initiatives that align our new~~non-GAAP basis from the first quarter of Fiscal 2011. Gross margin on a GAAP basis for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 and ~~existing products and services with customers’ needs, particularly for enterprise products and solutions. As we shift our focus more to enterprise solutions and services, we believe~~Fiscal 2011 includes the ~~improved mix~~effects of ~~higher margin sales will positively impact our gross margins over time.~~

~~Severance and Facility Actions~~

~~Due to our continued migration towards a more variable cost manufacturing model, we continue to incur certain~~amortization of intangible assets, severance and facility action costs, ~~though~~and acquisition-related charges. As set forth in the reconciliation under "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below, these ~~costs have decreased~~items are excluded from the ~~prior year. During~~calculation of non-GAAP gross margin for the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and first half~~ of Fiscal ~~2011,~~2012 and Fiscal 2011. Amortization of intangible assets included in gross margin increased 4% to $71 million for the ~~cost of these actions was $24 million and $81 million, respectively, of which $14 million and $43 million, respectively, affected gross margin. For the second~~first quarter ~~and first six months~~ of Fiscal ~~2010,~~2012. Amortization of intangibles is

Table of Contents

primarily related to the intangible assets related to our acquisition of Perot Systems Corporation ("Perot Systems") in Fiscal 2010. Severance and facility action costs included in gross margin decreased 82% to $5 million during the first quarter of Fiscal 2012. The decrease in severance and facility action costs was due to a decrease in cost ~~of these actions was $87 million and $272 million, respectively, of which $14 million and $79 million, respectively, affected gross margin. While we~~reduction activities from Fiscal 2011. We believe that we have substantially completed ~~a significant portion of~~ our manufacturing transformation, weand do not expect to ~~implement~~incur significant additional ~~cost reduction measures depending on a number of factors, including end-user demand and~~costs related to these activities. However, we may incur severance costs in the ~~continued simplification of our supply and logistics chain. Additional cost reduction measures may include selected headcount reductions,~~future as ~~well as~~they relate to other cost reduction programs. See Note 11 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Part I — Item 1 — Financial Statements” for additional information on severance and facility action costs.acquisitions.

Vendor Rebate Programs

Our gross margin is affected by our ability to achieve ~~favorable~~competitive pricing with our vendors and contract manufacturers, including through our negotiation of a variety of vendor rebate programs to achieve lower net

costs for the various components we include in our products. Under these programs, vendors provide us with rebates or other discounts from the list prices for the components, which are generally elements of their pricing strategy. Vendor rebate programs are only one element of the costs we negotiate for our product components. We account for ~~these~~ rebates and other discounts as a reduction in cost of net revenue. Our total net cost includes supplier list prices ~~as well as the~~reduced by vendor rebates and other discounts. We manage our costs on a total net cost basis.

The terms and conditions of our vendor rebate programs are largely based on product volumes and are generally not long-term in nature, but instead are typically negotiated at the beginning of each quarter. Because of the fluid nature of these ongoing negotiations, which reflect changes in the competitive environment, the timing and amount of rebates and other discounts we receive under the programs may vary from period to period. Since we manage our component costs on a total net cost basis, any fluctuations in the timing and amount of rebates and other discounts we receive from vendors may not necessarily result in material changes to our gross margin. We monitor our component costs and seek to address the effects of any changes to terms that might arise under our vendor rebate ~~programs, to minimize the potential impact on our business.~~programs. Our gross ~~margin was~~margins for the first quarters of Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 were not materially affected by any changes to the terms of our vendor rebate programs, ~~for the second quarter or first six months of Fiscal 2011,~~ as the amounts we received under these programs were generally stable relative to our ~~aggregate product~~total net cost. We are not aware of any significant programmatic changes to vendor pricing and rebate programs that will impact our results in the near term. These discounts and rebates are allocated to the segments based on a variety of factors, including strategic initiatives to drive certain programs.

Operating Expenses

Our cost reduction activities over the past several quarters are improving operating leverage as revenue growth is returning. Our operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue declined 170 basis points and 120 basis points~~year-over-year~~ ~~during the second quarter and first six months of Fiscal 2011, respectively.~~ The following table ~~summarizes~~presents information regarding our operating expenses for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011, and April 30, ~~2010, and July 31, 2009:~~2010:



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011						April 30, 2010
	Dollars		% of Revenue		% Change		Dollars		% of Revenue
	(in millions, except percentages)
Operating expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative	$	2,025	13.5	%	11	%	$	1,830	12.3	%
Research, development, and engineering	195		1.3	%	17	%	167		1.1	%
Total operating expenses	$	2,220	14.8	%	11	%	$	1,997	13.4	%

Other Financial Information
Non-GAAP operating expenses ^(a)	$	2,135	14.2	%	19	%	$	1,790	12.0	%

_______________________

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30, 2010 July 31, 2009 July 30, 2010 July 31, 2009
% of
%
% of
% of
%
% of
Dollars Revenue Change Dollars Revenue Dollars Revenue Change Dollars Revenue
(in millions, except percentages)
Operating expenses

Selling, general, and administrative $ 1,679 10.8% 7% $ 1,571 12.3% $ 3,509 11.5% 10% $ 3,184 12.7%
Research, development, and engineering 162 1.0% 9% 149 1.2% 329 1.1% 13% 290 1.1%

Operating expenses $ 1,841 11.8% 7% $ 1,720 13.5% $ 3,838 12.6% 10% $ 3,474 13.8%

^(a)For a reconciliation of non-GAAP operating expenses to operating expenses prepared in accordance with GAAP, see “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below.

•

~~Selling, General, and Administrative~~

Selling, General, and Administrative — ~~During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, selling, general and administrative (“SG&A”) expenses increasedyear-over-year,~~ while SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily attributable to increases in compensation-related expenses of approximately $116 million due to an increase in headcount resulting from our acquisitions. SG&A expenses related to headcount and infrastructure reductions through our on-going cost optimization efforts were $9 million for the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 compared to $71 million for the same period in the prior year. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, we also had a~~year-over-year~~ increase of $30 million related to advertising and promotion costs. SG&A expenses for the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 also included approximately $15 million of costs related to our acquisitions, which includes costs incurred for recent acquisitions as well as integrations costs related to Perot Systems.

During the first ~~six months~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2011,~~ 2012, selling, general, and administrative ("SG&A&A") expenses increased~~year-over-year,~~ ~~while SG&A expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased.~~ year-over-year. The increase in SG&A expenses was primarily attributable to increases in compensation-related expenses, ofadvertising, and promotional expenses. Compensation-related expenses, excluding severance-related expenses, increased approximately ~~$224~~$239 million due to an increase in headcount ~~resulting from~~of approximately 10% and an increase in performance-based compensation expense, which is tied to revenue and operating income growth and to

Table of Contents

cash flow targets. Our headcount increase was primarily due to our ~~acquisitions.~~acquisitions and new hires relating to our strategic initiatives to increase the number of sales specialists for our enterprise solutions and services offerings. We also experienced a year-over-year increase of $37 million in advertising and promotional expenses. In addition, higher SG&A expenses ~~related to headcount~~reflected increases in acquisition-related expenses, which were offset in part by decreases in severance and ~~infrastructure reductions through our on-going cost optimization efforts were $34 million for~~facility action costs discussed below.

Research, Development, and Engineering — During the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012, research, development, and engineering (“RD&E”) expenses were 1.3% of revenue compared to ~~$191 million for the same period~~1.1% in the prior year. ~~SG&A~~We manage our research, development, and engineering spending by targeting those innovations and products that we believe are most valuable to our customers and by relying upon the capabilities of our strategic relationships. We are increasing our focus on research and development and will continue to shift our investment in RD&E activities to support our initiatives to grow our enterprise solutions and services offerings.

Total operating expenses for the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal 2012 increased 11% to $2.2 billion on a GAAP basis and 19% to $2.1 billion on a non-GAAP basis from the first quarter of Fiscal 2011. Operating expenses on a GAAP basis for the first quarters of Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 ~~also included approximately $34 million in~~includes severance and facility charges, amortization of intangible assets, and acquisition-related charges. ~~In addition, during~~For the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, ~~Dell recorded~~operating expenses on a GAAP basis also includes $100 million ~~charge~~we incurred for our settlement of the SEC investigation and a $40 million charge for a securities litigation class action lawsuit that was filed against Dell during Fiscal 2007. See ~~Note 12 to~~"Note 11 of Notes to Condensed

Consolidated Financial Statements included in ~~“Part~~Part I — - Item 1 — - Financial ~~Statements”~~Statements" for ~~more information~~a discussion of our prior year settlement of the SEC investigation. As set forth in the reconciliation under “Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below, non-GAAP operating expenses for the first quarters of Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011 excludes the effects of these severance and facility action costs, amortization of intangible assets, and acquisition-related charges, and, for Fiscal 2011, the settlements referred to above. Amortization of intangibles and acquisition-related charges included in operating expenses increased 8% to $21 million and 163% to $50 million, respectively, compared to Fiscal 2011. The increases for amortization of intangibles and acquisition-related charges are primarily related to the business acquisitions completed in the first quarter of Fiscal 2012. Consistent with the discussion on ~~legal matters.~~severance and facility action costs in the gross margin section above, severance and facility action costs included in operating expenses decreased year-over-year by 51% to $14 million for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012.

•

~~Research, Development, and Engineering~~ — During the second quarter and first six months of Fiscal 2011, research, development and engineering (“RD&E”) expenses remained approximately 1% of revenue, consistent with the prior year. We manage our research, development, and engineering spending by targeting those innovations and products that we believe are most valuable to our customers and by relying upon the capabilities of our strategic relationships. We will continue to invest in RD&E activities to support our growth and to provide for new, competitive products.

Operating and Net Income

Operating Income — During the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, operating income increased 134% to $1.2 billion on a GAAP basis and 67% to $1.4 billion on a non-GAAP basis from the first quarter of Fiscal 2011. The increases were primarily attributable to the improved gross margins discussed above.

Net Income — During the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, net income increased 177% to $945 million on a GAAP basis and 80% to $1,050 million on a non-GAAP basis from Fiscal 2011. Net income was positively impacted by increases in operating income and a lower effective income tax rate. In addition, on a GAAP basis, Interest and Other, net decreased favorably by 38% for Fiscal 2012. See “Income and Other Taxes” and “Interest and Other, net” below for a discussion of our effective tax rates and interest and other, net.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We use non-GAAP financial measures in this report as performance measures to supplement the financial information we present on a GAAP basis. We believe that excluding certain items from our GAAP results allows our management and investors to better understand our consolidated financial performance from period to period and in relationship to the operating results of our segments, as our management does not believe that the excluded items are reflective of our underlying operating performance. We also believe that excluding certain items from our GAAP results allows our management to better project our future consolidated financial performance because our forecasts are developed at a level of detail different from that used to prepare GAAP-based financial measures. Moreover, we believe the non-GAAP financial measures provide investors with useful information to help them evaluate our operating results by facilitating an enhanced understanding of our underlying operating performance and enabling them to make more meaningful period to period comparisons.

The non-GAAP financial measures presented in this report include non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating expenses, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP net income and non-GAAP earnings per share. These non-GAAP financial measures, as defined by us, represent the comparable GAAP financial measures adjusted to exclude primarily the following items: acquisition-related charges; amortization of purchased intangible assets related to acquisitions; severance and facility action costs; and amounts for the settlement of the SEC investigation, as well as the settlement of a securities litigation matter, which were incurred during the first quarter of Fiscal 2011. We provide below more detail regarding each of these items and our reasons for excluding the items. In future periods, we expect that we may again exclude such items and may incur income

Table of Contents

and expenses similar to these excluded items. Accordingly, the exclusion of these items and other similar items in our non-GAAP presentation should not be interpreted as implying that the items are non-recurring, infrequent, or unusual.

There are limitations to the use of the non-GAAP financial measures presented in this report. Our non-GAAP financial measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies. Other companies, including companies in our industry, may calculate the non-GAAP financial measures differently than we do, limiting the usefulness of those measures for comparative purposes. In addition, items such as amortization of purchased intangible assets represent the loss in value of intangible assets over time. The expense associated with this loss in value is not included in the non-GAAP financial measures and such measures, therefore, do not reflect the full economic effect of such loss. Further, items such as severance and facility action costs and acquisition expenses that are excluded from the non-GAAP financial measures can have a material impact on earnings. Our management compensates for the foregoing limitations by relying on our GAAP results and using non-GAAP financial measures supplementally or for projections when comparable GAAP financial measures are not available. The non-GAAP financial measures are not meant to be considered as indicators of performance in isolation from or as substitutes for gross margin, operating expenses, operating income, net income, and earnings per share prepared in accordance with GAAP, and should be read only in conjunction with financial information presented on a GAAP basis. We provide below reconciliations of each non-GAAP financial measure to its most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, and encourage you to review the reconciliations in conjunction with the presentation of the non-GAAP financial measures for each respective period.


•	~~Operating Income~~ — During the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, operating income increased 11% and 16%, respectively. The increases were primarily due to increases in gross margin dollars of 8% and 12% for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, respectively. A 7% and 10%~~year-over-year~~ increase in operating expenses during the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, respectively, negatively impacted operating income, while operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue decreased during the same periods.

•	~~Net Income~~ ~~— For the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, net income increasedyear-over-year~~ for both periods by 16% to $545 million and $886 million, respectively. Net income was positively impacted by increases in operating income and a lower effective tax rate for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011. The lower effective tax rates were offset by higher interest expenses. See “Income and Other Taxes” and “Interest and Other, net” sections below for discussions of our effective tax rates and interest and other, net.

The following is a summary of the costs and other items excluded from the most comparable GAAP financial measures to calculate the non-GAAP financial measures presented in this management's discussion and analysis:

Acquisition-related Costs — Acquisition-related charges are expensed as incurred and consist primarily of retention payments, integration costs, and other costs. Retention payments include stock-based compensation and cash incentives awarded to employees, which are recognized over the vesting period. Integration costs include incremental business costs that are primarily attributable to the acquisition of Perot Systems during the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2010 and are being incurred during the integration period. These costs primarily include IT costs related to the integration of IT systems and processes, costs related to the integration of Perot Systems employees, costs related to full-time employees who are working on the integration, and consulting expenses. Acquisition-related charges are inconsistent in amount and are significantly impacted by the timing and nature of acquisitions. Therefore, although we may incur these types of expenses in connection with future acquisitions, we believe eliminating acquisition-related charges for purposes of calculating the non-GAAP financial measures facilitates a more meaningful evaluation of our current operating performance and comparisons to our past operating performance.

Amortization of Intangible Assets — Amortization of purchased intangible assets consists primarily of amortization of customer relationships, customer lists, acquired technology, trade names, and non-compete covenants purchased in connection with business acquisitions. We incur charges relating to the amortization of these intangibles, and those charges are included in our consolidated financial statements. Amortization charges for our purchased intangible assets are inconsistent in amount from period to period and are significantly impacted by the timing and magnitude of our acquisitions. Consequently, we exclude these charges for purposes of calculating the non-GAAP financial measures to facilitate a more meaningful evaluation of our current operating performance and comparisons to Dell's past operating performance.

Severance and Facility Actions — Severance and facility action costs primarily relate to facilities charges, including accelerated depreciation and severance and benefits for employees terminated pursuant to actions taken as part of a comprehensive review of costs, including certain employee cost synergies realized through our strategic acquisitions. While we expect to continue to incur severance and facility costs with any new cost reduction activities, we exclude these severance and facility action costs for purposes of calculating the non-GAAP financial measures because we believe that these historical costs do not reflect expected future operating expenses and do not contribute to a meaningful evaluation of our current operating performance or comparisons to our past operating performance.

Other Fees and Settlements — We also adjust our GAAP results for certain fees and settlements. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, we recorded a $100 million settlement amount for the SEC investigation into certain of Dell's accounting and financial matters, which was initiated in 2005, and incurred $40 million for a securities litigation class action lawsuit that was filed against us during Fiscal 2007. We are excluding these settlements from the operating results for the first quarter of Fiscal 2011 for the purpose of calculating the non-GAAP financial measures because we believe these fees and settlements, while not unusual, are outside our ordinary course of business and do not contribute to a meaningful evaluation of our current operating performance.

32
Table of Contents

Aggregate Adjustment for Income Taxes — The aggregate adjustment for income taxes is the estimated combined income tax effect for the adjustments mentioned above. The tax effects are determined based on the jurisdictions where the adjustments were incurred.
The table below presents a reconciliation of our non-GAAP financial measures to the most comparable GAAP measure for the three months ended April 29, 2011, and April 30, 2010:
Three Months Ended
April 29, 2011 % Change April 30, 2010
(in millions, except percentages)
GAAP gross margin $ 3,432 36 % $ 2,516
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Amortization of intangibles 71 68
Severance and facility actions 5 29
Acquisition-related 3 1
Non-GAAP gross margin $ 3,511 34 % $ 2,614

GAAP operating expenses $ 2,220 11 % $ 1,997
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Amortization of intangibles (21 ) (20 )
Severance and facility actions (14 ) (28 )
Acquisition-related (50 ) (19 )
Other fees and settlements — (140 )
Non-GAAP operating expenses $ 2,135 19 % $ 1,790

GAAP operating income $ 1,212 134 % $ 519
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Amortization of intangibles 92 88
Severance and facility actions 19 57
Acquisition-related 53 20
Other fees and settlements — 140
Non-GAAP operating income $ 1,376 67 % $ 824

GAAP net income $ 945 177 % $ 341
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Amortization of intangibles 92 88
Severance and facility actions 19 57
Acquisition-related 53 20
Other fees and settlements — 140
Aggregate adjustment for income taxes (59 ) (62 )
Non-GAAP net income $ 1,050 80 % $ 584

GAAP earnings per share - diluted $ 0.49 188 % $ 0.17
Non-GAAP adjustments per share - diluted 0.06 0.13
Non-GAAP earnings per share - diluted $ 0.55 83 % $ 0.30

33
Table of Contents

Three Months Ended
April 29, 2011 April 30, 2010
Percentage of Total Net Revenue
GAAP gross margin 22.9 % 16.9 %
Non-GAAP adjustments 0.5 % 0.7 %
Non-GAAP gross margin 23.4 % 17.6 %

GAAP operating expenses 14.8 % 13.4 %
Non-GAAP adjustments (0.6 )% (1.4 )%
Non-GAAP operating expenses 14.2 % 12.0 %

GAAP operating income 8.1 % 3.5 %
Non-GAAP adjustments 1.1 % 2.0 %
Non-GAAP operating income 9.2 % 5.5 %

GAAP net income 6.3 % 2.3 %
Non-GAAP adjustments 0.7 % 1.6 %
Non-GAAP net income 7.0 % 3.9 %

34
Table of Contents

Segment Discussion

Our four global business segments are Large Enterprise, Public, Small and Medium Business, and Consumer.

Severance and facility action expenses, broad based long-term incentive expenses, amortization of purchased intangible assets costs, acquisition-related expenses, and charges related to our settlement of the SEC investigation as well as a securities litigation class action lawsuit that were incurred during the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, are not allocated to the reporting segments as management does not believe that these items are reflective of the underlying operating performance of the reporting segments. These costs totaled ~~$214~~$261 million and ~~$606~~$392 million for the ~~second quarter and~~ first ~~half~~quarters of Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, respectively. ~~For the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2010, these costs totaled $219 million and $519 million, respectively. See~~

See Note 1615 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Part I— Item 1— Financial Statements” for additional ~~information~~information and reconciliation of segment revenue and operating income to consolidated revenue and operating income.

The following table ~~summarizes~~presents our net revenue and operating income by our reportable global segments:



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011						April 30, 2010
	Dollars		% of Revenue^(a)		% Change		Dollars		% of Revenue^(a)
	(in millions, except percentages)
Large Enterprise
Net revenue	$	4,477	30	%	5	%	$	4,246	28	%
Operating income	$	504	11	%	78	%	$	283	7	%
Public
Net revenue	$	3,767	25	%	(2	)%	$	3,856	26	%
Operating income	$	370	10	%	24	%	$	298	8	%
Small and Medium Business
Net revenue	$	3,768	25	%	7	%	$	3,524	24	%
Operating income	$	463	12	%	48	%	$	313	9	%
Consumer
Net revenue	$	3,005	20	%	(7	)%	$	3,248	22	%
Operating income	$	136	5	%	685	%	$	17	1	%

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30, 2010 July 31, 2009 July 30, 2010 July 31, 2009
% of
%
% of
% of
%
% of
Dollars Revenue^(a) Change Dollars Revenue^(a) Dollars Revenue^(a) Change Dollars Revenue^(a)
(in millions, except percentages)
Large Enterprise
Net revenue $ 4,549 29% 38% $ 3,285 26% $ 8,795 29% 32% $ 6,685 27%
Operating income 288 6% 68% 172 5% 571 7% 57% 364 5%
Public
Net revenue $ 4,580 30% 21% $ 3,798 30% $ 8,436 28% 21% $ 6,969 28%
Operating income 369 8% (4% ) 383 10% 667 8% (1% ) 676 10%
Small and Medium Business
Net revenue $ 3,535 23% 25% $ 2,820 22% $ 7,059 23% 22% $ 5,787 23%
Operating income 323 9% 32% 246 9% 636 9% 34% 476 8%
Consumer
Net revenue $ 2,870 18% 0% $ 2,861 22% $ 6,118 20% 8% $ 5,665 22%
Operating income (loss) (21 ) (1% ) (124% ) 89 3% (4 ) 0% (105% ) 88 2%

_______________________


^(a)		Operating income percentage of revenue is stated in relation to the respective segment.

•

~~Large Enterprise~~ —~~Theyear-over-year~~ increase in Large Enterprise’s revenue for the second quarter of Fiscal 2010 was mainly attributable to improved demand. Many of our customers who delayed or canceled IT projects as a result of the economic slowdown have resumed IT spending. Large Enterprise experienced~~year-over-year~~ increases in revenue across all product lines during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. Revenue from servers and networking and services increased 54% and 56%, respectively. The increase in services revenue was largely due to the integration of Perot Systems. Demand for our client products also increased, with mobility and desktop PC revenue increasing 51% and 35%~~year-over-year,~~ ~~respectively. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, Large Enterprise’s revenue increasedyear-over-year~~ ~~across all regions.~~

Large Enterprise — Revenue for Large Enterprise increased year-over-year for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 across all product lines , except for storage and desktop revenue, which declined 30% and 1%, respectively. The decrease in storage revenue was primarily due to a decrease in the sale of third-party storage products as we shift towards more Dell-branded storage solutions. Revenue from servers and networking and services increased 6% and 7%, respectively. Mobility revenue increased 16% and software and peripherals increased 11% year-over-year for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, Large Enterprise's revenue increased overall across non-US regions, while revenue from the U.S. decreased slightly.

During the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2011, all product~~2012, operating income as a percentage of net revenue increased 460 basis points year-over-year to 11.3%. The increase was primarily attributable to improvements in gross margin for our products. The increase in gross margins was partially offset by an increase in operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue, primarily due to increased selling and ~~services categories~~marketing costs.

Public — During the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, Public experienced ~~increases~~an overall decrease in ~~revenue.~~revenue that was primarily driven by year-over-year decreases in revenue from mobility and desktop products of 6% and 13%, respectively. Revenue from servers and networking increased ~~57%~~9% year-over-year, while storage revenue decreased 6%. Revenue from services, and software and peripherals increased 2% and 6% year-over-year, respectively. The decline in Public's revenue was primarily driven by decreases in the U.S. and the Europe, Middle East, and African regions, which we refer to as "EMEA,"

Table of Contents

due to continuing budgetary constraints on public spending.

Public's operating income percentage increased 210 basis points to 9.8% for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 due to improved gross margin percentages for our products, which were partially offset by increases in operating expenses as a percentage of revenue, primarily due to increases in selling and marketing costs.

Small and Medium Business — During the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, SMB experienced a year-over-year increase in revenue with increases across all product and services categories, although revenue increases for mobility and desktop products were slight. Servers and networking, and storage revenue increased ~~50% primarily as result of the integration of Perot Systems.~~19% and 7% year-over-year, respectively. Revenue from mobility and desktop PCs increased ~~31%~~1% and ~~28%~~2% year-over-year, respectively, while software and peripherals revenue increased 11% year-over-year. The improved demand environment was a major contributor to the increase in revenue for all product categories. Services revenue increased 16% year-over-year. For the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, SMB revenue experienced year-over-year growth across the Americas and Asia Pacific Japan, or "APJ", while SMB revenue from EMEA remained flat. ~~respectively.~~

~~During the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, operating~~Operating income percentage increased ~~110~~340 basis points~~year-over-year~~ to 6.3% and 6.5%, respectively, mostly driven by tighter spending controls and revenue increases that resulted in operating expenses decreasing as a percentage of net revenue, offset by a decrease in gross margin percentage, resulting from component cost pressures and the product pricing environment.

•

~~Public~~ —~~During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, Public experienced ayear-over-year~~ increase in revenue across all product and service categories. Services contributed the largest increase, with a 116% increase in revenue over the prior year. The increase in services revenue was primarily a result of our integration of Perot Systems. Revenue from servers and networking and desktop PCs had double digit~~year-over-year~~ increases of 12% and 10%, respectively. Public’s revenue grew during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 across all regions, though demand from U.S. state and local governments and our Europe-based Public customers was muted due to fiscal budget constraints.

~~Public’syear-over-year~~ increase in revenue across all product and service categories for the first half of Fiscal 2011 was consistent with the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. Revenue from services increased 119% as a result of our integration of Perot, while revenue from servers and networking increased 14%~~year-over-year.~~

For the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, operating income percentage decreased 210 basis points and 180 basis points, respectively, from the same periods last year to 8.0% and 7.9%, respectively. Operating income percentage was negatively impacted by a~~year-over-year~~ decrease in gross margin percentage as our services portfolio mix shifted to lower margin categories due to the integration of Perot Systems. Operating expenses as a percentage of net revenue for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011 were relatively consistent with the same periods of Fiscal 2010.

•

~~Small and Medium Business~~ —~~During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, SMB experienced ayear-over-year~~ increase in revenue with double digit percentage increases across all product categories. The revenue growth was led by 32% and 29% increases in mobility and desktop PCs revenue, respectively, and a 28% increase in servers and networking revenue. The improved demand environment was a major contributor to the increase in revenue for SMB. SMB revenue experienced~~year-over-year~~ ~~growth across all regions during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, while our BRIC revenue grew 63%year-over-year.~~

SMB revenue also increased for all product and service categories for the first half of Fiscal 2011. Revenue from desktop PCs and mobility products had the greatest dollar increases, with each increasing 25%~~year-over-year.~~ ~~Revenue from servers and networking and software and peripherals increased 28% and 16%, respectively.~~

~~For the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, operating income percentage increased 40 basis points and 80 basis points, respectively,year-over-year~~ ~~to 9.1% and 9.0%, respectively.~~12.3%. The increase in operating income percentage ~~for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011~~ was ~~largely due~~attributable to improved ~~demand and tighter spending controls that resulted~~gross margins for our products, which were partially offset by an increase in operating expenses ~~decreasing~~ as a percentage of revenue ~~offset by a decrease in gross margin percentage~~ due to ~~the~~ higher ~~mix of client products sold~~selling and marketing costs.

Consumer — Consumer's revenue decreased 7% year-over-year during the ~~periods.~~

•

~~Consumer~~ —~~Consumer’s revenue remained flatyear-over-year~~ ~~during the second~~first quarter ~~of Fiscal 201l as all relevant product and service categories, except for Consumer mobility products, experiencedyear-over-year~~ ~~declines. Consumer mobility revenue increased by 9%year-over-year~~ while revenue from desktop PCs decreased 8% during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. The continuing shift in consumer preference from desktops to notebooks has contributed to continued revenue mix shifts to mobility products. Partially offsetting the increase in mobility products revenue for the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 was a decrease of 21% in software and peripherals revenue, which was largely due to a $53 million transaction in the second quarter of Fiscal 2010, in which a vendor purchased our contractual right to share in future revenues from product renewals sold by the vendor. We did not have a similar transaction during the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. At a country level, our U.S. revenue decreased 15%~~year-over-year~~ ~~for the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 due to softer demand, while ournon-U.S.~~ ~~regions experienced 21% revenue growth. Revenue from BRIC grew 68%year-over-year~~ for the second quarter of Fiscal 2011. We expanded our global retail presence over the prior year and now reach approximately 66,000 retail locations worldwide, compared to 40,000 at the end of the second quarter of Fiscal 2010. Our global retail expansion has increased our customer base.

~~During the first half~~ of Fiscal ~~2011, Consumer’s revenue grew 8% largely due to an increase in mobility revenue of 17%, which was offset in part by decreases in revenue~~2012. Revenue from all ~~other~~ product and services ~~categories.~~categories decreased year-over-year for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, except mobility products, which had a slight increase of 2% year-over-year. Revenue from desktop PCs decreased by 26% due to a decline in desktop PC units of 20%. Average selling prices for Consumer mobility and desktop PCs decreased 6% and 7% year-over-year, respectively, during the first quarter of Fiscal 2012. Consumer services decreased 6% year-over-year and software and peripherals revenue decreased 27% for the same period. We continue to see a shift in sales mix from direct to retail sales, which typically have lower attach rates for services and software and peripherals. At a country level, our U.S. Consumer revenue decreased 7%21% year-over-year due to softer demand, while our non-U.S. regions in aggregate experienced 6% revenue growth. Revenue from BRIC grew 26% year-over-year for the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2011, while our BRIC revenue grew 80%.~~2012.

For the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and first half~~ of Fiscal ~~2011, Consumer’s~~2012, Consumer's operating income percentage ~~decreased approximately 380 and 170~~increased 400 basis points ~~respectively,~~year-over-year to ~~negative 0.7% and negative 0.1%,~~4.5%. The ~~decrease~~increase in operating income percentage was largely attributable to ~~decreases~~an increase in gross margin percentage. Consumer gross margin ~~decreased~~increased due to ~~fluctuations~~a shift in ~~component prices that were not offset by selling prices,~~product mix to higher value client products, which ~~resulted in decreased~~generate more favorable gross margins, ~~for all~~as well as year-over-year increases in profitability from our ~~Consumer product categories.~~customer financing arrangements. Operating expenses as a percentage of revenue ~~decreased during~~increased slightly year-over-year due to increased selling and marketing costs.

For the second quarter ~~and first half~~ of Fiscal ~~2011 as compared~~2012, we expect to ~~the same periods~~see stronger spending from our Public customers and above average seasonal increases in ~~Fiscal 2010, even though operating expenses remained relatively flatyear-over-year.~~ ~~During the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, we combined~~revenue from our SMB and Consumer and SMB under a single leadership team to reduce overall costs, though we are continuing to manage and report the two segments separately. As we work to improve profitability, we continue to monetize aspects of the consumer business model with arrangements with vendors and suppliers, such as revenue sharing arrangements, which we believecustomers. Our gross margins will continue to ~~contribute to and improve Consumer’s operating income over time, although such impacts may not~~ be ~~linear.~~impacted by changes in commodity prices. We expect the ~~operating income percentage for Consumer~~current favorable commodity price environment to ~~improve~~moderate over the next two quarters. We expect to balance the ~~1% to 2% range~~effects of changes in the ~~near term, as we balance profitability~~commodity cost environment with ~~growth.~~pricing discipline, and continue to execute our move to more differentiated and higher value products.

Table of Contents

Revenue by Product and Services Categories

We design, develop, manufacture, market, sell, and support a wide range of products that in many cases are customized to individual customer requirements. Our products are organized between enterprise and client categories. Our enterprise products include servers and networking, and storage products. Client products include mobility and desktop PC products. Our services include a broad range of configurable IT and business services, including infrastructure technology, consulting and applications, and ~~business process~~product-related support services. We also offer software and peripheral products.

The following table summarizes our net revenue by product and ~~service~~services categories for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011, and April 30, ~~2010, and July 31, 2009:~~2010:


	Three Months Ended										Six Months Ended
	July 30, 2010						July 31, 2009				July 30, 2010						July 31, 2009				Three Months Ended
			% of		%				% of				% of		%				% of		April 29, 2011						April 30, 2010
	Dollars		Revenue		Change		Dollars		Revenue		Dollars		Revenue		Change		Dollars		Revenue		Dollars		% of Revenue		% Change		Dollars		% of Revenue
							(in millions, except percentages)														(in millions, except percentages)
Net revenue:
Enterprise products:
Enterprise solutions and services:
Enterprise solutions:
Servers and networking	$	1,890		12%		35%	$	1,403		11%	$	3,675		12%		37%	$	2,689		11%	$	1,973	13	%	11	%	$	1,785	12	%
Storage		624		4%		13%		551		4%		1,178		4%		9%		1,085		4%	481		3	%	(13	)%	554		4	%
Services		1,915		12%		57%		1,218		10%		3,806		12%		55%		2,456		10%	1,984		13	%	5	%	1,891		13	%
Software and peripherals		2,535		17%		6%		2,382		19%		5,031		17%		9%		4,628		18%	2,567		17	%	3	%	2,496		17	%
Client products:
Client:
Mobility		4,700		30%		21%		3,891		30%		9,263		30%		19%		7,766		31%	4,716		32	%	3	%	4,563		30	%
Desktop PCs		3,870		25%		17%		3,319		26%		7,455		25%		15%		6,482		26%	3,296		22	%	(8	)%	3,585		24	%

Net revenue	$	15,534		100%		22%	$	12,764		100%	$	30,408		100%		21%	$	25,106		100%

Total net revenue																					$	15,017	100	%	1	%	$	14,874	100	%

Enterprise Solutions and Services

▪Enterprise Solutions:

Servers and Networking — The ~~increases~~increase in our ~~server~~servers and networking revenue ~~during~~for the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and~~of Fiscal 2012, over the first ~~of half~~quarter of Fiscal 2011 ~~as compared~~was due to a shift towards more differentiated products that command higher selling prices. During the ~~same periods~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2010 were due to demand improvements across all Commercial segments and all regions. During the second quarter and first six months of Fiscal 2011, unit shipments increased 15% and 22%year-over-year,~~ ~~respectively, and~~2012, average selling prices increased ~~17% and 12%~~16%, while units sold decreased 5%.

~~year-over-year,~~Storage ~~respectively, driven by improved product mix toward our new product lines. Our cloud computing servers were considerable contributors to theyear-over-year~~ ~~increase~~ — Storage revenue decreased 13% for the ~~second quarter and~~ first ~~half of Fiscal 2011. During the second~~ quarter of Fiscal ~~2011,~~2012. The decrease in Storage revenue was primarily due to an anticipated decline in the sale of third-party storage products as we ~~introduced~~shift towards selling more Dell-branded storage products such as our ~~PowerEdge R815~~EqualLogic, PowerVault, and ~~PowerEdge R715 efficient data center~~recently added Compellent products. Revenue from Dell-branded storage products ~~which use the AMD Opteron~~^tm ~~6100 series processors.~~increased 11% year-over-year. We ~~also introduced our PowerConnect J-series of network offerings.~~

~~Storage~~ ~~— During the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, all our Commercial segments hadyear-over-year~~ ~~increases in storage revenue. Dell EqualLogic~~^tm ~~continues to perform strongly, withyear-over-year~~ ~~revenue growth of 63% and 69% for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, respectively. We are shifting~~believe that we will generate higher margins as we shift towards more Dell-branded ~~and co-branded~~ storage offerings, which generally can be sold with service ~~solutions and provide increased margin opportunity. During~~solutions. Our acquisition of Compellent during the ~~second~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011, we introduced~~2012 will expand our ~~Dell EqualLogic PS6000XVS~~enterprise and ~~Dell EqualLogic PS6010XVS~~cloud storage ~~arrays with enhancements to improve density and performance, as well as our PowerVault MD 3200 and PowerVault MD3200i storage arrays targeted forsmall-to-medium~~offerings. ~~sized businesses.~~

▪

Services — Services revenue increased 5% for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, which was mostly driven by an increase in transactional revenue. Our estimated services backlog as of April 29, 2011, and April 30, 2010, was $14.1 billion and $13.9 billion, respectively. We provide information regarding services backlog because we believe it provides useful trend information regarding changes in the size of our services business over time. Services backlog, as defined by us, includes deferred services revenue and contracted services backlog. Deferred services revenue, which consists primarily of our extended warranties, was $6.9 billion and $6.1 billion as of April 29, 2011, and April 30, 2010, respectively. Estimated contracted services backlog, which is primarily related to our outsourcing services business, was $7.2 billion and $7.7 billion, as of April 29, 2011, and April 30, 2010, respectively. See "Part II — Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Results of Operations — Revenue by Product and Services Categories — Services ” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended January 28, 2011 for more information on our services

Table of Contents

backlog calculation.

~~Services~~ ~~— Services offerings include infrastructure technology, consulting and applications, and business process services. Services revenue increased by $697 million and $1.35 billion~~

~~year-over-year~~ during the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, respectively, with revenue from Perot Systems contributing a large proportion of the increase. Perot Systems reported revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, of $628 million and $1.2 billion, respectively. Combining the results of Perot Systems revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, with Dell Services revenue for the three and six months ended July 31, 2009, does not take into

consideration intercompany charges nor anticipated synergies or other effects of the integration of Perot Systems. Perot Systems’ June 30, 2009, results are presented for informational purposes only and are not indicative of the results that actually would have occurred if the acquisition had been completed at the beginning of Fiscal 2010, nor are they indicative of future results.

The integration of Perot Systems primarily impacts our Public and Large Enterprise segments. We continue to view services as a strategic growth opportunity and will continue to invest in our offerings and resources focused on increasing our solutions sales. The dynamics of our services business will continue to change as we integrate Perot Systems. With Perot Systems, we have extended our services business further into infrastructure business process outsourcing, consulting, and application development as well as our overall customer base. We also anticipate expanding our existing managed and modular services businesses.

~~Our deferred service revenue balance increased 7.4%year-over-year~~ ~~to $6.3 billion at July 30, 2010, primarily due to an increase in up-sell service offerings.~~

Software and Peripherals — Revenue from sales of software and peripherals (“S&P”) is derived from sales of Dell-branded printers, monitors (not sold with systems), projectors, keyboards, mice, docking stations, and a multitude of third-party peripherals, including ~~LCD~~ televisions, cameras, stand-alone software sales and related support services, and other products. The 3% year-over-year increase in S&P revenue for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 was driven by ~~overall customer unit shipment~~ increases ~~due to improvements~~ in ~~demand~~revenue from the sale of electronics and peripherals and software, which was partially offset by a decrease in revenue from imaging products. Revenue from displays ~~and electronics, which experienced a combined~~were flat year-over-year ~~revenue increase of 17% and 18%~~ for the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and first half~~ of Fiscal ~~2011, respectively.~~2012.

Software revenue from our S&P line of business, which includes stand-alone sales of software license fees and related post-contract customer support, is ~~included~~reported in services revenue, including software related on ~~the~~our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income. Software and related support services revenue represented ~~34%~~33% and ~~43%~~32% of services revenue, including software related ~~during~~for the ~~second~~first quarters of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 and Fiscal ~~2010, respectively, and 33% and 42% for the first half of Fiscal~~ 2011, ~~and Fiscal 2010,~~ respectively.

Client

▪

~~Mobility~~ — Revenue from mobility products (which include notebook computers, mobile workstations, and smartphones) increased during the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011 across all operating segments due to demand improvements. Mobility units increased 21% and 24%Mobility — Revenue from mobility products (which include notebook computers, mobile workstations, and smartphones) increased 3% during the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, which was primarily driven by our Large Enterprise segment and partially offset by a decrease in our Public segment. Revenue from our SMB and Consumer customers was relatively flat year-over-year for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012. Mobility units increased 6%, while average selling prices decreased slightly by 2% for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012. The increase in mobility revenue is primarily driven by our Latitude and XPS notebooks. for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, respectively. Average selling prices were flat for the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 and decreased 4% for the first half of Fiscal 2011, due to a shift in product mix to lower priced mobility product offerings. During the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, overall, Commercial mobility revenue increased 30% and 21%~~year-over-year,~~ respectively, and Consumer increased 9% and 17%, respectively. The increase in Commercial mobility is driven by increases in demand for our Latitude and Vostro notebooks. We believe the on-going demand trend towards mobility products will continue, and we plan to address this demand by expanding our product platforms to cover broader feature sets and price bands. During the second quarter of Fiscal 2011, we introduced additional models to our Inspiron family of notebooks.

▪

Desktop PCs — During the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, revenue from desktop PCs (which include desktop computer systems and fixed workstations) decreased as units sold for desktop PCs decreased by 7%. The average selling price for our desktop computers decreased slightly by 2% year-over-year. Revenue from our Large Enterprise and SMB customers were relatively flat year-over-year, while our Public and Consumer businesses experienced 13% and 26% decreases, respectively. We are continuing to see rising end-user demand for mobility products, which moderates the demand for desktop PCs.

~~Desktop PCs~~ — During the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, revenue from desktop PCs (which include desktop computer systems and fixed workstations) increased as unit demand for desktop PCs increased by 12% during both periods. The average selling price for our desktop computers increased slightly by 4% and 3%~~year-over-year~~ ~~for the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, respectively. The increase in unit demand was driven by our Large Enterprise and SMB customers, with 24% and 27% increasesyear-over-year,~~ respectively, for the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 and 26% and 24%, respectively, for the first half of Fiscal 2011. In the consumer marketplace, we are continuing to see rising end-user demand for mobility products, which moderates the demand for desktop PCs. For the second quarter and first half of Fiscal 2011, unit demand from our Consumer customers for desktop PCs declined 9% and 6%, respectively, while mobility units increased 11% and 20%~~year-over-year,~~ ~~respectively. We experiencedyear-over-year~~ ~~increases in demand for all our commercial lines of desktop PCs and fixed work stations including our Optiplex, and Vostro, desktops and Precision fixed work stations.~~

Interest and Other, ~~Net~~net

The following table provides a detailed presentation of interest and other, net for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~July~~April 29, 2011, and April 30, 2010 ~~and July 31, 2009:~~:

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
July 30,
July 31,
July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009 2010 2009
(in millions)
Interest and other, net:

Investment income, primarily interest $ 11 $ 15 $ 19 $ 36
Gains on investments, net 3 - 3 1
Interest expense (46 ) (39 ) (93 ) (68 )
Foreign exchange (7 ) (26 ) (37 ) (26 )
Other (10 ) 8 (9 ) 13

Interest and other, net $ (49 ) $ (42 ) $ (117 ) $ (44 )



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011			April 30, 2010
	(in millions)
Interest and other, net:
Investment income, primarily interest	$	17		$	8
Gains (losses) on investments, net	1			—
Interest expense	(62		)	(47		)
Foreign exchange	—			(30		)
Other	2			1
Interest and other, net	$	(42	)	$	(68	)

We continued to maintain a portfolio of instruments with ~~shorter~~short maturities, which typically carry lower market yields. ~~Market yields on short-term instruments declinedyear-over-year~~ ~~for~~For the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and first half~~ of Fiscal ~~2011, resulting in lower~~2012, our investment ~~income.~~income increased over the prior year, primarily due to higher average cash balances with higher average yields.

Theyear-over-year increase in interest expense for the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and first half~~ of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 was due to higher debt levels, which increased to ~~$5.3~~$7.6 billion as of ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011, from ~~$3.4~~$4.7 billion as of ~~July 31, 2009.~~April 30, 2010.

Theyear-over-year ~~change~~ decrease in foreign exchange expense for the ~~second~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011, as compared to the same period in the prior year,~~2012 was primarily due to revaluation ~~of certain~~gains from unhedged ~~foreign currency balances. For~~currencies and a decrease in the ~~first half~~cost of ~~Fiscal 2011 as compared to 2010, foreign exchange increased due to higher costs associated with~~ the hedging ~~program resulting from currency volatility.~~program.

Table of Contents

Income and Other Taxes

Our effective ~~income~~ tax rate was ~~21.7%~~19.2% and ~~25.0%~~24.4% for the ~~second quarter~~first quarters of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 and Fiscal ~~2010, respectively. For the first half of Fiscal~~ 2011, ~~and Fiscal 2010, our effective income tax rate was 22.8% and 26.8%,~~ respectively. The ~~decreases~~decrease in our effective income tax rate for the ~~second~~first quarter ~~and first half~~ of Fiscal 2011 were primarily due to the favorable effective settlement of a tax audit in a foreign jurisdiction, finalization of certain advanced pricing agreements with foreign jurisdictions, and also Dell’s geographical distribution of taxable income. For Fiscal 2011, we estimate our effective annual tax rate, including the effect of this favorable settlement, to be approximately 25%. In2012 from the first quarter of Fiscal 2011 ~~we forecasted our effective annual tax rate to be 27%. The decrease in the forecasted effective annual tax rate is~~was primarily due to an increase in the ~~favorable outcome~~proportion of ~~the foreign audits and advanced pricing agreements as mentioned above.~~taxable income attributable to lower tax jurisdictions during Fiscal 2012. The ~~difference~~differences between ~~the estimated~~our effective ~~income~~ tax rate and the U.S. federal statutory rate of 35% principally ~~results~~resulted from our geographical distribution of taxable income and permanent differences between the book and tax treatment of certain items. ~~The income~~Our foreign earnings are generally taxed at lower rates than in the U.S. We continue to assess our business model and its impact in various tax ~~rate for future quarters of Fiscal 2011 will be impacted by the actual mix of jurisdictions in which income is generated.~~jurisdictions.

We take certain non-income tax positions in the jurisdictions in which we operate and have received certain non-income tax assessments from some of these jurisdictions. ~~We are also involved in related non-income tax litigation matters in various jurisdictions.~~ These jurisdictions include Brazil, where we are in litigation with ~~the~~a state government over the proper application of transactional taxes to warranties ~~and software~~ related to the sale of ~~computers, as well as over~~computers. See Note 13 of the ~~appropriate use~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Part I - Item 1 - Financial Statements ” for additional information on these income tax related matters.

LEGAL MATTERS

Several of ~~state statutory incentives~~our vendors have been involved in legal actions initiated by their customers, including us, that relate to ~~reduce~~these vendors' past pricing practices. In the ~~transactional taxes. Tax litigation in Brazil has historically taken multiple years~~past, we have received settlements relating to ~~resolve. While~~these legal actions and we ~~believe we will ultimately prevail~~may receive additional settlements in the ~~Brazilian courts, we have also negotiated certain tax incentives with the state that can be used~~future relating to ~~offset potential tax liabilities should the courts rule against us. The incentives are based upon the number~~such currently unresolved actions. See Note 11 of jobs we maintain within the state. We have, as expected, received adverse rulings from the tax administrative court level, and will appeal. In conjunction with these appeals, we have pledged our manufacturing facilityNotes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in ~~Hortolandia, Brazil to the government and have provided a bank guarantee to begin the appeal process within the judicial courts.~~

We continue to believe our positions are supportable, a liability is not probable, that we will ultimately prevail, and that a risk of disruption to our Brazilian manufacturing operations is remote. In the normal course of business, our positions and conclusions“Part I - Item 1 - Financial Statements” for additional information on other litigation related to our non-income taxes could be challenged and assessments may be made. To the extent new information is obtained and our views on our positions, probable outcomes of assessments, or litigation change, changes in estimates to our accrued liabilities would be recorded in the period in which the determination is made.matters.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

We sell products and services directly to customers and through a variety of sales channels, including a retail ~~distribution network.~~distribution. At ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011, our ~~gross~~ accounts receivable, ~~balance~~net was ~~$6.7~~$6.2 billion, ~~an increase of 12%~~a 5% decrease from our balance at January ~~29, 2010. The increase~~28, 2011. This decrease in accounts receivable was primarily ~~attributable~~due to ~~our Commercial~~a slight decrease in revenue ~~growth during the first half of Fiscal 2011.~~quarter-over-quarter. We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to cover receivables that may be deemed uncollectible. The allowance for losses is based on specific identifiable customer accounts that are deemed at risk and a general provision based on historical bad debt experience. As of ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011 and January ~~29, 2010,~~28, 2011, the allowance for doubtful accounts was ~~$93~~$95 million and ~~$115~~$96 million, respectively. ~~Our allowance has declined as a percentage of accounts receivable over the prior year due to improved aging of balances and better loss experiences.~~ Based on our assessment, we believe ~~that~~ we are adequately reserved for expected credit losses. We monitor the aging of our accounts receivable and continue to take actions to reduce our exposure to credit losses.

DELL FINANCIAL SERVICES AND FINANCING RECEIVABLES

DFS offers a wide range of financial services in the U.S., including originating, collecting, and servicing customer receivables related to the purchase of Dell products. To support the financing needs of our customers internationally, we have aligned with a select number of third-party financial services companies. In April 2011, we announced our intent to acquire Dell Financial Services Canada Limited. from CIT Group Inc., as well as CIT Vendor Finance's Dell-related assets and sales and servicing functions in Europe. The acquisition of these assets will enable global expansion of Dell's direct finance model. Subject to customary closing conditions, we expect to close the acquisition in Canada in the second quarter of Fiscal 2012 and the acquisition in Europe in Fiscal 2013. CIT Vendor Finance is currently a Dell financing partner operating on behalf of Dell Financial Services in more than 25 countries and will continue to support Dell for the transition periods in Canada and Europe. CIT Vendor Finance will also continue to provide financing programs with Dell in select countries around the world beyond these transactions, including programs in Latin America.

~~FINANCING RECEIVABLES~~The results of DFS are included in the business segment where the customer receivable was originated. Due to improving economic conditions and portfolio performance, DFS's contribution to operating profitability has increased for all of our business segments.

At ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011 and January ~~29, 2010,~~28, 2011, our net financing receivables balances were ~~$3.9~~$4.3 billion and ~~$3.0~~$4.4 billion, respectively. ~~The increase was primarily the result of the consolidation of two previously nonconsolidated qualifying special purpose entities (“SPEs”) as discussed below.~~ We expect some growth in financing receivables to continue throughout Fiscal ~~2011.~~2012. To manage the expected growth in financing receivables, we will continue to balance the use of our own working capital and other sources of liquidity, including securitization programs. Starting in the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, CIT Group Inc. (“CIT”), formerly a joint venture partner of Dell Financial Services L.L.C. (“DFS”), our wholly-owned subsidiary, is no longer funding DFS financing receivables.

~~During the first half of Fiscal 2011,~~We have securitization programs to fund revolving loans and fixed-term leases and loans through consolidated special purpose entities ("SPEs"), which we ~~continued to~~account for as secured borrowings. We transfer certain customer financing receivables to these SPEs ~~in securitization transactions. The~~whose purpose ~~of the SPEs~~ is to facilitate the funding of customer receivables through financing arrangements with multi-seller

Table of Contents

conduits that issue asset-backed debt securities in the capital markets. WeDuring the first quarters of Fiscal 2012 and Fiscal 2011, we transferred ~~$524~~$499 million and ~~$262~~$496 million, respectively, to these ~~SPEs during the three months ended July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009, and $1 billion and $495 million during the first half of Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2010, respectively.~~SPEs. Our risk of loss related to these securitized receivables is limited to the amount of our over-collateralization in the transferred pool of receivables. We have a securitization program to fund revolving loans through a consolidated SPE, which we account for as a secured borrowing. Additionally, as of January 29, 2010, the two SPEs that funded fixed-term leases and loans were not consolidated. Asrecently replaced one of the ~~beginning of the first quarter of Fiscal~~fixed-term lease and loan programs in May 2011, we adopted the new accounting guidance that requires us to apply variable interest entity accounting to these special purpose entities and therefore, consolidated the two remaining nonconsolidated SPEs. The impact of the adoptionwhich resulted in ~~a decrease to beginning retained earnings~~better pricing for ~~Fiscal~~this program. At April 29, 2011 of $13 million. There was no impact to our results of operations or our cash flows upon adoption of the new accounting guidance. Starting in the first quarter of Fiscal 2011, we account for these fixed-term securitization programs as secured borrowings. At July 30, 2010, and January ~~29, 2010,~~28, 2011, the structured financing debt related to all of our secured borrowing securitization programs was ~~$918 million~~$1.2 billion and ~~$164 million,~~$1.0 billion, respectively, and the carrying amount of the corresponding financing receivables was $1.4 billion and $1.3 billion, ~~and $0.3 billion,~~ respectively.

We maintain an allowance to cover expected financing receivable credit losses and we evaluate credit loss expectations based on our total portfolio. For the ~~periods~~three months ended ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011 and January ~~29, 2010,~~28, 2011, the ~~annualized~~net principal charge-off rate for our total portfolio was ~~6.7%~~5.3%, and ~~8.2%~~6.5%, respectively. The allowance for losses is determined based on various factors, including historical and anticipated experience, past due receivables, receivable type, and customer risk profile. At ~~July 30, 2010,~~April 29, 2011 and January ~~29, 2010,~~28, 2011, the allowance for

financing receivable losses was ~~$277~~$217 million and ~~$237~~$241 million, respectively. In general, we are seeing improving loss rates associated with our financing receivables as the economy has stabilized. We have an extensive process to manage our exposure to customer risk, including active management of credit lines and our collection activities. The ~~increase~~credit quality mix of our financing receivables has improved in ~~the allowance is primarily~~recent years due to our underwriting actions and as the ~~incremental allowance from the consolidation~~mix of ~~variable interest entities and an additional allowance related to assets that were included~~high quality commercial accounts in ~~a qualified special purpose entity and consolidated during the second quarter of Fiscal 2010, which have liquidated slower than we originally anticipated.~~our portfolio has increased. Based on our assessment of the customer financing receivables, we believe that we are adequately reserved.

The Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility, and Disclosure Act of 2009 was signed into U.S. law on May 22, 2009, and has affected the consumer financing provided by DFS. Commercial credit is unaffected by the changes in law. A majority of the provisions of the law are now in effect. This Act imposed new restrictions on credit card companies in the areas of marketing, servicing, and pricing of consumer credit accounts. The changes have not substantially altered how consumer credit is offered to our customers or how their accounts are serviced. We do not feel that the impact of these changes is material to Dell’s financial results.

See Note 5 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Part I — Item 1 — Financial Statements” for additional information about our financing ~~receivables.~~receivables and the associated allowance.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

~~With the consolidation of our previously nonconsolidated special purpose entities, we no longer~~We do not have any off-balance sheet financing arrangements.

LIQUIDITY, ~~AND~~ CAPITAL COMMITMENTS, AND CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS

Current Market Conditions

We regularly monitor economic conditions and associated impacts on the financial markets and our business. Though there ~~were signs of~~has been improvement in the global economic environment ~~during the first half of Fiscal 2011,~~in recent quarters, we continue to be cautious given the volatility associated with currency markets, international sovereign economies, and other economic indicators. We continue to evaluate the financial health of our supplier base, carefully manage customer credit, diversify counterparty risk, and monitor the concentration risk of our cash and cash equivalents balances globally. ~~Additionally, we maintain a conservative investment portfolio with shorter duration and high quality assets.~~

We monitor credit risk associated with our financial counterparties using various market credit risk indicators such as credit ratings issued by nationally recognized rating agencies and changes in market credit default swap levels. We perform periodic evaluations of our positions with these counterparties and may limit exposure to any one counterparty in accordance with our policies. We monitor and manage these activities depending on current and expected market developments.

See “Part I— Item 1A— Risk Factors” in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended January ~~29, 2010,~~28, 2011, for further discussion of risks associated with ~~instability in the financial markets as well as~~ our use of counterparties. ~~We believe that no significant concentration of credit risk exists for our investments.~~ The impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of any credit adjustments related to these counterparties has been immaterial.

Liquidity

~~Liquidity~~

~~We ended the second quarter of Fiscal 2011 with $13.1 billion in cash, cash equivalents, and investments compared to $12.7 billion at the end of the second quarter of Fiscal 2010.~~ Cash generated from operations is our primary source of operating liquidity and we believe that internally generated cash flows are sufficient to support day-to-day business operations. ~~We have an active~~Our working capital management team ~~that~~actively monitors the efficiency of our balance sheet ~~by evaluating liquidity~~ under various macroeconomic and competitive scenarios. These scenarios quantify risks to the financial statements and provide a basis for actions necessary to ensure adequate liquidity, both domestically and ~~internationally.~~internationally, to support our acquisition and investment strategy, share repurchase activity and other corporate needs. We utilize external capital sources, such as long-term notes and ~~other term debt, commercial paper, or~~ structured financing arrangements, and short-term borrowings, consisting primarily of commercial paper, to supplement our internally generated sources of liquidity as necessary. ~~In addition, we~~We have a currently effective shelf registration statement filed with the SEC for the issuance of an

~~indeterminate amount~~debt securities. The current shelf registration will terminate during the second quarter of ~~debt securities which~~Fiscal 2012 and we ~~have used and expect~~intend to ~~use~~replace the shelf registration prior to its termination to allow us to continue to issue debt ~~securities before its expiration or replacement during~~securities. During the first quarter of Fiscal ~~2012. We have continued to have access to the capital markets in~~2012, we issued $1.5 billion principal amount of notes with terms that are consistent with our recent ~~periods. Any future disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in those markets may result in higher funding costs for us and adversely affect our ability to obtain funds.~~note issuances. We intend to maintain ~~the~~ appropriate debt levels based upon cash flow expectations, the overall cost of capital, cash requirements for operations, and discretionary spending, including for acquisitions and share repurchases. Due to the overall strength of our financial position, we believe that we will have adequate access to capital

Table of Contents

markets. Any future disruptions, uncertainty or volatility in those markets may result in higher funding costs for us and could adversely affect our ability to obtain funds.

At April 29, 2011, we had $15.2 billion in total cash, cash equivalents, and investments. Our cash balances are held in numerous locations throughout the world, ~~including substantial amounts held~~most of which are outside of the U.S. While our U.S. cash balances do fluctuate, we typically operate with 10% - 20% of our cash balances held domestically. Demands on our domestic cash have increased as a result of our strategic initiatives. We fund these initiatives through a balance of internally generated cash, external sources of capital, which include our $2.0 billion commercial paper program, and, when advantageous, access to foreign cash in a tax efficient manner. Where local regulations limit an efficient intercompany transfer of amounts held outside of the U.S., we will continue to utilize these funds for local liquidity needs. Under current law, balances available to be repatriated ~~back~~ to the U.S. would be subject to U.S. federal income taxes, less applicable foreign tax credits. We have provided for the U.S. federal tax liability on these amounts for financial statement purposes, except for foreign earnings that are considered permanently reinvested outside of the U.S. We utilize a variety of tax planning and financing strategies with the objective of having our worldwide cash available in the locations where it is needed. Ournon-U.S. domiciled cash and investments are generally denominated in the U.S. ~~dollar.~~

Dollar.

The following table contains a summary of our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the respective periods:


	Six Months Ended
	July 30,			July 31,		Three Months Ended
	2010			2009		April 29, 2011			April 30, 2010
	(in millions)					(in millions)
Net change in cash from:
Operating activities	$	1,573		$	1,837	$	465		$	238
Investing activities		(620	)		40	(1,549		)	(360		)
Financing activities		125			1,379	1,170			(254		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(19	)		91	62			(4		)

Change in cash and cash equivalents	$	1,059		$	3,347	$	148		$	(380	)

Operating Activities — Operating cash flows for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 increased compared to the prior year. The ~~decrease~~increase in operating cash flows was ~~primarily led~~driven by ~~less favorable changes~~year-over-year increases in ~~working capital during the first half of Fiscal 2010, the effects of~~net income and deferred services revenue, which were partially offset by ~~the increase~~a net unfavorable change in ~~net income and deferred revenue.~~working capital. See “Key Performance Metrics” below for ~~additional~~ discussion of our cash conversion cycle.

Investing Activities —Investing activities consist of the net of maturities and sales and purchases of investments; net capital expenditures for property, plant, and equipment; principal cash flows related to purchased financing receivables; and net cash used to fund strategic acquisitions. ~~During~~Cash used in investing activities during the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2011, net~~2012 was $1.5 billion compared to cash used ~~for investment activities was $225 million, as compared to a net cash sourced~~ of ~~$206~~$360 million during the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2010~~2011. The year-over-year increase in cash used in investing activities for the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 was mainly due to ~~a shift from cash equivalents to short-term investments.~~higher acquisition spending. Cash used to fund strategic acquisitions, net of cash acquired, was approximately ~~$222~~$1.5 billion during the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 compared to approximately $133 million during the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal 2011. Our Fiscal 2012 acquisitions consisted of SecureWorks and Compellent , while our first quarter Fiscal 2011 acquisitions consisted primarily ~~related to the acquisition~~ of ~~KACE and Ocarina, compared to $3 million during the first half of Fiscal 2010.~~Kace Networks, Inc.

Financing Activities — Financing activities primarily consist of proceeds and repayments from borrowings and the repurchase of our common stock. Theyear-over-year ~~decrease~~ increase in cash provided by financing activities for the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 was mainly due to the net proceeds from issuance of long-term debt of $1.5 ~~billion~~billion. We did not issue any debt during the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2010. We had $3.3 billion in principal of long-term notes outstanding as of July 30, 2010, and July 31, 2009.~~2011. During the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2011,~~2012, net cash provided by proceeds from ~~the issuance of commercial paper and~~ structured financing ~~debt~~programs was ~~$514 million. We repurchased 26~~$116 million ~~shares for $400~~compared to $35 million during the first ~~half~~quarter of Fiscal ~~2011 and we expect to repurchase shares throughout~~2011. We had net repayments of $86 million from commercial paper during the ~~remainder~~first quarter of ~~the fiscal year.~~Fiscal 2011. We did not ~~repurchase~~issue or repay any ~~shares~~commercial paper during the first ~~half of Fiscal 2010.~~

~~During the second~~ quarter of Fiscal 2012. We had $6.3 billion principal amount of long-term notes and senior debentures outstanding as of April 29, 2011, ~~we entered into a new agreement~~compared to ~~expand our commercial paper program~~$3.3 billion as of April 30, 2010. Offsetting the net proceeds from debt was cash used for the repurchase of 31 million shares of common stock for $450 million during the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 compared to ~~$2 billion.~~ $200 million used for the repurchase of 12 million shares in the first quarter of Fiscal 2011.

We have $2$3 billion of senior unsecured revolving credit facilities ~~supporting the~~primarily to support our $2 billion commercial

paper program. ~~Our~~We entered into a new senior unsecured revolving credit facility during the first quarter of Fiscal 2012 for an increased amount of $2 billion, ~~of credit facilities consist of two agreements, with~~which will expire on April 15, 2015. We terminated the $1 billion ~~expiring on June 1, 2011, and~~credit facility that was set to expire in the second quarter of Fiscal 2012. The remaining $1 billion ~~expiring~~credit facility will expire on April 2, 2013. As of April

~~During the first half~~41

Table of ~~Fiscal~~Contents

29, 2011, we issued commercial paper with original maturities of less than 90 days and we continue to be active in the commercial paper market by issuing short-term borrowings to augment our liquidity as needed. As of July 30, 2010, we had $900 milliondid not have any amounts outstanding under the commercial paper ~~program. We did not have any commercial paper outstanding~~program compared to $410 million as of ~~July 31, 2009.~~

April 30, 2010.

We issued structured financing-related debt to fund our financing receivables as previously discussed in the “Financing Receivables” section above. The total debt capacity of our securitization programs is ~~$1.1 billion. As of July 30, 2010,~~$1.4 billion, and we had ~~$918 million~~$1.2 billion in outstanding structured ~~financing-related debt. In connection with the annual renewal process~~financing securitization debt as of our securitization programs, we are currently evaluating changes in the U.S. bank regulatory environment and potential impacts to our securitization activities. Depending on market conditions, we may introduce additional banking partners or expand capacity under our existing programs. As we negotiate these annual renewals, which will begin in October 2010, management will continue to assess the costs and benefits of continuing to use securitization programs to fund our receivables. We do not currently foresee significant challenges in the renewal process and we expect to be able to continue to offer or arrange financing to our customers.

April 29, 2011.

See Note 6 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements under “Part I — Item 1 — Financial Statements” for further discussion of our debt.

Key Performance Metrics — Our cash conversion cycle for the ~~six months~~fiscal quarter ended ~~July 30, 2010, improved~~April 29, 2011 contracted from the ~~six months~~fiscal quarter ended ~~July 31, 2009.~~April 30, 2010. Our business model allows us to maintain an efficient cash conversion cycle, which compares favorably with that of others in our industry.

The following table presents the components of our cash conversion cycle ~~at July~~for the three months ended April 29, 2011, and April 30, ~~2010, and July 31, 2009:~~2010:



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011		April 30, 2010
Days of sales outstanding^(a)	40		38
Days of supply in inventory^(b)	10		9
Days in accounts payable^(c)	(81	)	(83	)
Cash conversion cycle	(31	)	(36	)

July 30,
July 31,
2010 2009
Days of sales outstanding^(a)
41 42
Days of supply in inventory^(b)
10 7
Days in accounts payable^(c)
(87 ) (84 )

Cash conversion cycle (36 ) (35 )

_____________________


(a)		Days of sales outstanding (“DSO”) calculates the average collection period of our receivables. DSO is based on the ending net trade receivables and the most recent quarterly revenue for each period. DSO also includes the effect of product costs related to customer shipments not yet recognized as revenue that are classified in other current assets. DSO is calculated by adding accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, and customer shipments in transit and dividing that sum by average net revenue per day for the current quarter (90 days). At ~~July~~April 29, 2011, and April 30, 2010 ~~and July 31, 2009,~~, DSO and days of customer shipments not yet recognized were 3837 and 3 days, and 3835 and 43 days, respectively.


(b)		Days of supply in inventory (“DSI”) measures the average number of days from procurement to sale of our ~~product.~~products. DSI is based on ending inventory and most recent quarterly cost of sales for each period. DSI is calculated by dividing inventory by average cost of goods sold per day for the current quarter (90 days).


(c)		Days in accounts payable (“DPO”) calculates the average number of days our payables remain outstanding before payment. DPO is based on ending accounts payable and most recent quarterly cost of sales for each period. DPO is calculated by dividing accounts payable by average cost of goods sold per day for the current quarter (90 days).

~~Our cash conversion cycle improved one~~The five day ~~at July 30, 2010,~~contraction from ~~July 31, 2009,~~the prior year was driven by a ~~three~~two day ~~improvement~~increase in ~~DPO and~~DSO, a one day increase in DSI and a two day decrease in ~~DSO, which was partially offset by a three day~~DPO year-over-year. The increase in DSI. The improvement in DPO from July 31, 2009, was attributable to our ongoing transition to contract manufacturing, further standardization of vendor agreements, and timing of supplier purchases and payments during the first half of Fiscal 2011 as compared to the same period of Fiscal 2010. The decrease in DSO from ~~July 31, 2009 is consistent with the revenue~~April 30, 2010, was due to growth ~~we experienced over the prior year.~~in our commercial business, which typically has longer payment terms. The slight increase in DSI from ~~July 31, 2009,~~April 30, 2010, was primarily attributable to an increase in strategic purchases of materials ~~purchases~~ and finished goods inventory. The two day decrease in DPO was due to the timing of supplier purchases and payments.

We defer the cost of revenue associated with customer shipments not yet recognized as revenue until ~~they~~these shipments are delivered. These deferred costs are included in our reported DSO because we believe this reporting results in a more accurate presentation of our DSO and cash conversion cycle. These deferred costs are recorded in other current assets in our Condensed Consolidated Statements of Financial Position and totaled ~~$556~~$497 million and ~~$537~~$465 million, at ~~July~~April 29, 2011, and April 30, 2010, ~~and July 31, 2009,~~ respectively.

We believe that we can generate cash flow from operations in excess of net income over the long term and can operate our cash conversion cycle ~~at negative mid-thirty days or better.~~in the mid-negative 30 day range.

Capital Commitments

Share Repurchase Program — We have a share repurchase program that authorizes us to purchase shares of our common stock through a systematic program of open market purchases in order to increase shareholder value and manage dilution resulting from shares issued under our equity compensation plans. However, we do not currently have a policy that requires the repurchase of common stock to offset share-based compensation arrangements. For more information regarding share repurchases, see “Part II — Item 2 — Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.”

Capital Expenditures — During the ~~three months~~first quarters of Fiscal 2012 and ~~six months ended July 30, 2010,~~Fiscal 2011, we spent ~~$145~~$137 million and ~~$191~~$46 million, respectively, on property, plant, and equipment primarily in connection with our global expansion efforts and infrastructure

Table of Contents

investments made to support future growth. ~~We spent $99 million and $179 million for the three and six months ended July 31, 2009, respectively on property, plant, and equipment.~~ Product demand, product mix, and the increased use of contract manufacturers, as well as ongoing investments in operating and information technology infrastructure, influence the level and prioritization of our capital expenditures. ~~Total~~Aggregate capital expenditures for Fiscal ~~2011,~~2012, which will be primarily related to infrastructure investments and strategic initiatives, are currently expected to total approximately ~~$500~~$700 million to $750 million. These expenditures ~~are expected to~~will be primarily funded from our cash flows from operating activities.

~~Restricted Cash~~ — As of July 30, 2010, and January 29, 2010, we have restricted cash in the amount of $171 million and $147 million, respectively, included in other current assets. These balances primarily relate to an agreement between DFS and CIT which requires us to maintain escrow cash accounts that are held as recourse reserves for credit losses, performance fee deposits related to our private label credit card, and deferred servicing revenue, as well as amounts maintained in escrow accounts related to our recent acquisitions.

RECENTLY ISSUED AND ADOPTED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See Note 1 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Part I— Item 1 —Financial Statements” for a description of recently issued and adopted accounting pronouncements, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on our results of operations, financial position, and cash flows.


*~~ITEM 3.~~*	*ITEM 3. — QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK*

For a description of ~~our~~ market risks, see “Part II — Item 7 — Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Market Risk” in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended January ~~29, 2010.~~28, 2011. Our exposure to market risks has not changed materially from the description in the Annual Report onForm 10-K.


*~~ITEM 4.~~*	*~~CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES~~*

Table of Contents

ITEM 4 — CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

This ~~Report~~report includes the certifications of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer required byRule 13a-14 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the ~~“Exchange Act”~~"Exchange Act"). See Exhibits 31.1 and ~~31.2 to this report.~~31.2. This Item 4 includes information concerning the controls and control evaluations referred to in those certifications.

~~EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES~~

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures —

Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined inRules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the ~~chief executive officer~~Chief Executive Officer and the ~~chief financial officer,~~Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

In connection with the preparation of this ~~Report,~~report, our management, under the supervision and with the participation of ~~the~~our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~July 30, 2010.~~April 29, 2011. Based on that evaluation, our ~~Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have~~management has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of ~~July 30, 2010.~~April 29, 2011.

SEC Settlement Undertakings — - As part of our settlement of an SEC investigation into certain disclosure, accounting and financial reporting matters described under the caption “Legal Matters” in Note 1211 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Part I —- Item 1 —- Financial Statements,” we have consented to perform the following undertakings related to our disclosure processes, practices and controls:


	•	For a minimum period of three years, enhance our disclosure review committee (“DRC”) processes by having qualified outside securities counsel attend all DRC meetings and review all of our SEC periodic filings prior to filing.

	•	Within 30 days after court approval of the settlement, retain an independent consultant not unacceptable to the SEC staff to review and evaluate our disclosure processes, practices and controls and to recommend changes designed to improve those processes, practices and controls, and, within 90 days after issuance of the independent consultant’s report containing such review, evaluation and recommendations, which will be due within 120 days, adopt and implement all recommendations contained in the report.

	•	For a minimum period of three years, provide annual training reasonably designed to minimize the possibility of future violations of the disclosure requirements of the federal securities laws, with a focus on disclosures required in management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, for (1) members of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors; (2) members of the DRC; (3) our senior officers; (4) our internal disclosure counsel; (5) personnel in our internal audit department that perform assurance services; (6) all persons required to certify in our filings with the SEC that such filings make adequate disclosure under the federal securities laws; and (7) all other persons employed by us who have responsibility for the review of our filings with the SEC.

For a minimum period of three years, enhance our disclosure review committee (“DRC”) processes by having qualified outside securities counsel attend all DRC meetings and review all of our SEC periodic filings prior to filing.

Retain an independent consultant not unacceptable to the SEC staff to review and evaluate our disclosure processes, practices and controls and to recommend changes designed to improve those processes, practices and controls, and, within 90 days after issuance of the independent consultant's report containing such review, evaluation and recommendations, which was issued in the first quarter of Fiscal 2012, adopt and implement all recommendations contained in the report.

For a minimum period of three years, provide annual training reasonably designed to minimize the possibility of future violations of the disclosure requirements of the federal securities laws, with a focus on disclosures required in management's discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, for (1) members of the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors; (2) members of the DRC; (3) our senior officers; (4) our internal disclosure counsel; (5) personnel in our internal audit department that perform assurance services; (6) all persons required to certify in our filings with the SEC that such filings make adequate disclosure under the federal securities laws; and (7) all other persons employed by us who have responsibility for the review of our filings with the SEC.

We will be required to certify to the SEC staff that we have complied with the foregoing undertakings.

We have initiated ~~action~~actions to perform each of the foregoing undertakings.

~~CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING~~Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the ~~second~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION


*~~ITEM 1.~~*	*ITEM 1 — LEGAL PROCEEDINGS*

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the information set forth under the caption “Legal Matters” in Note 1211 of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in “Part I — Item 1 — Financial ~~Statements,”~~Statements” and is incorporated herein by ~~reference into this Item 1 of Part II of this report.~~reference.

Additional information on ~~Dell’s~~Dell's commitments and contingencies can be found in ~~Dell’s~~Dell's Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended January ~~29, 2010.~~28, 2011.

ITEM ~~1A.~~1A — RISK FACTORS

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, the factors discussed in ~~“Part~~"Part I — Item 1A — Risk ~~Factors”~~Factors" in our Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended January ~~29, 2010,~~28, 2011, could materially affect our business, financial condition, or operating results. The risks described in our Annual Report onForm 10-K and our subsequent SEC reports are not the only risks facing us. There are additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial that may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, or operating results.

~~In addition to the risks described in our Annual Report onForm 10-K,~~ ~~the following risk may adversely affect our business, financial condition, or operating results:~~ITEM 2 — UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

We are subject to the risk of temporary suspension or debarment from contracting with U.S. federal, state and local governments as a result of settlements of an SEC investigation by our company and our Chairman and CEO.

As part of settlements of an SEC investigation into certain disclosure, accounting and financial reporting matters, we and our Chairman and CEO consented, without admitting or denying the SEC’s allegations, to a permanent injunction against future violations of certain provisions of the federal securities laws. The existence and terms of such injunctions may adversely affect our business under contracts with U.S. federal, state and local governments. The procurement regulations of federal governmental agencies and many state and local governments with which we do business generally vest those governments with broad discretion to suspend or debar companies from product and services contracts for periods of generally up to three years if the governments determine that companies do not prospectively qualify as responsible contracting parties. The various levels of government could also require us to operate under special reporting and other compliance measures, which could increase our costs of performance under the applicable contracts.


*~~ITEM 2.~~*	*~~UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS~~*

PURCHASES OF COMMON STOCK

Share Repurchase Program

We have a share repurchase program that authorizes us to purchase shares of common stock in order to increase shareholder value and manage dilution resulting from shares issued under our equity compensation plans. However, we do not currently have a policy that requires the repurchase of common stock in conjunction with share-based payment arrangements. The following table sets forth information regarding our repurchases or acquisitions of common stock during the ~~second~~first quarter of Fiscal ~~2011~~2012 and the remaining authorized amount ~~for~~of future purchases under our share repurchase program:

Total
Approximate
Number of
Dollar Value
Shares
of Shares That
Purchased
May Yet Be
as Part of
Purchased
Total
Weighted
Publicly
Under the
Number of
Average
Announced
Announced
Shares
Price Paid
Plans or
Plans or
Period Purchased^(a) per Share Programs^(b) Programs^(b)
(in millions, except average price paid per share)

May 1, 2010, through May 28, 2010 - $ - - $ 4,343
May 29, 2010, through June 25, 2010 14 $ 13.87 14 $ 4,143
June 26, 2010, through July 30, 2010 - $ - - $ 4,143

Total 14 $ 13.87 14



	Total Number of Shares Purchased ^(a)	Weighted Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs ^(b)	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs ^(b)
Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased ^(a)	Weighted Average Price Paid per Share
	(in millions, except average price paid per share)
Repurchases from January 29, 2011 through February 25, 2011	11	$	14.27	11	$	3,582
Repurchases from February 26, 2011 through March 25, 2011	6	$	15.36	6	$	3,493
Repurchases from March 26, 2011 through April 29, 2011	14	$	14.72	14	$	3,293
Total	31	$	14.68	31

_____________________

(a) Includes 1,858 shares withheld to cover employee tax obligations for restricted stock awards vested during the quarter ended April 29, 2011 at an average price of $15.69 per share.

(b) On December 4, 2007, we publicly announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a share repurchase program for up to $10.0 billion of our common stock over an unspecified amount of time.


~~(a)~~		~~Includes 3,645 shares withheld to cover employee tax obligations for restricted stock awards vested during quarter ended July 30, 2010 at an average price of $13.39 per share.~~


~~(b)~~		~~On December 4, 2007, we publicly announced that our Board of Directors had authorized a share repurchase program for up to $10 billion of our common stock over an unspecified amount of time.~~


*~~ITEM 6.~~*	*~~EXHIBITS~~*

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibits — See Index to Exhibits below following the signature page to this report.

~~SIGNATURE~~SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.



	DELL INC.

~~Date: August 26, 2010~~	By:	/s/ THOMAS W. SWEET

		Thomas W. Sweet
		Vice President, Corporate Finance and
		Chief Accounting Officer
		(On behalf of ~~the~~ registrant and as principal accounting officer)

Date: May 26, 2011

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS



Exhibit No.			Description of Exhibit
3.1	†	—	Restated Certificate of Incorporation
3.2		—	Restated Bylaws, as amended and effective as of August 16, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Dell's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended July 30, 2010, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.1		—	Indenture, dated as of April 27, 1998, between Dell Computer Corporation and Chase Bank of Texas, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 28, 1998, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.2		—	Officers' Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture establishing the terms of Dell's 7.10% Senior Debentures Due 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 28, 1998, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.3		—	Form of Dell's 7.10% Senior Debentures Due 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 28, 1998, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.4		—	Indenture, dated as of April 17, 2008, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A. (formerly The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A.), as trustee (including the form of notes) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 17, 2008, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.5		—	Indenture, dated as of April 6, 2009, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 6, 2009, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.6		—	First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 6, 2009, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 6, 2009, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.7		—	Form of 5.625% Notes due 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 6, 2009, Commission File No. 0‑17017)
4.8		—	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated June 15, 2009, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 15, 2009, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.9		—	Form of 3.375% Notes due 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 15, 2009, Commission File No. 0‑17017)
4.10		—	Form of 5.875% Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 15, 2009, Commission File No. 0‑17017)
4.11		—	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated September 10, 2010, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 10, 2010, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.12		—	Form of 1.40% Notes due 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 10, 2010, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.13		—	Form of 2.30% Notes due 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 10, 2010, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.14		—	Form of 5.40% Notes due 2040 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 10, 2010, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.15		—	Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated March 31, 2011, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 31, 2011, Commission File No. 0-17017)

Table of Contents



Exhibit No.				Description of Exhibit
4.16			—	Form of Floating Rate Notes due 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 31, 2011, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.17			—	Form of 2.100% Notes due 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 31, 2011, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.18			—	Form of 3.100% Notes due 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 31, 2011, Commission File No. 0-17017)
4.19			—	Form of 4.625% Notes due 2021 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5 of Dell's Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 31, 2011, Commission File No. 0-17017)
12.1	†		—	Computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges
31.1	†		—	Certification of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	†		—	Certification of Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	††		—	Certifications of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101	.INS§		—	XBRL Instance Document
101	.SCH§		—	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101	.CAL§		—	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101	.LAB§		—	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101	.PRE§		—	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101	.DEF§		—	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
		~~principal accounting officer)~~

~~INDEX TO EXHIBITS~~

Exhibit

No. Description of Exhibit
3 .1† — Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended
3 .2† — Restated Bylaws, as amended and effective as of August 16, 2010
4 .1 — Indenture, dated as of April 27, 1998, between Dell Computer Corporation and Chase Bank of Texas, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 28, 1998, Commission FileNo. 0-17017)
4 .2 — Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture establishing the terms of Dell’s 7.10% Senior Debentures Due 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 28, 1998, Commission FileNo. 0-17017)
4 .3 — Form of Dell’s 7.10% Senior Debentures Due 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 28, 1998, Commission FileNo. 0-17017)
4 .4 — Indenture, dated as of April 17, 2008, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of notes) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 17, 2008, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
4 .5 — Indenture, dated April 6, 2009, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 6, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
4 .6 — First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 6, 2009, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 6, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
4 .7 — Form of 5.625% Notes due 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 6, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
4 .8 — Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2009, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed June 15, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
4 .9 — Form of 3.375% Notes due 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed June 15, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
4 .10 — Form of 5.875% Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed June 15, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
12 .1† — Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
31 .1† — Certification of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31 .2† — Certification of Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32 .1†† — Certifications of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002


†		Filed with this report.

††	Furnished with this report.
§		Furnished with this report. In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.


	July 30, 2010								January 29, 2010
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
	Quoted								Quoted
	Prices								Prices
	in Active		Significant						in Active		Significant
	Markets for		Other		Significant				Markets for		Other		Significant
	Identical		Observable		Unobservable				Identical		Observable		Unobservable
	Assets		Inputs		Inputs				Assets		Inputs		Inputs
	(in millions)
Assets:
Cash equivalents:
Commercial paper	$	-	$	549	$	-	$	549	$	-	$	197	$	-	$	197
U.S. government and agencies		-		82		-		82		-		-		-		-
Debt securities:
U.S. government and agencies		-		55		-		55		-		66		-		66
U.S. corporate		-		545		31		576		-		553		30		583
International corporate		-		630		-		630		-		391		-		391
State and municipal governments		-		-		-		-		-		2		-		2
Equity and other securities		-		96		-		96		-		90		-		90
Retained interest		-		-		-		-		-		-		151		151
Derivative instruments		-		120		-		120		-		96		-		96

Total assets	$	-	$	2,077	$	31	$	2,108	$	-	$	1,395	$	181	$	1,576

Liabilities:
Derivative instruments	$	-	$	37	$	-	$	37	$	-	$	12	$	-	$	12

Total liabilities	$	-	$	37	$	-	$	37	$	-	$	12	$	-	$	12


	July 30, 2010									January 29, 2010
	Fair				Unrealized		Unrealized			Fair				Unrealized		Unrealized
	Value		Cost		Gain		(Loss)			Value		Cost		Gain		(Loss)
	(in millions)
Investments:
U.S. government and agencies	$	55	$	55	$	-	$	-		$	65	$	65	$	-	$	-
U.S. corporate		375		375		-		-			233		232		1		-
International corporate		314		314		-		-			75		75		-		-

Total short-term investments		744		744		-		-			373		372		1		-

U.S. government and agencies		-		-		-		-			1		1		-		-
U.S. corporate		201		201		1		(1	)		350		349		2		(1	)
International corporate		316		316		1		(1	)		316		316		1		(1	)
State and municipal governments		-		-		-		-			2		2		-		-
Equity and other securities		116		116		-		-			112		112		-		-

Total long-term investments		633		633		2		(2	)		781		780		3		(2	)

Total investments	$	1,377	$	1,377	$	2	$	(2	)	$	1,154	$	1,152	$	4	$	(2	)



	April 29, 2011								January 28, 2011
	Current		Past Due 1 — 90 Days		Past Due > 90 Days		Total		Current		Past Due 1 — 90 Days		Past Due > 90 Days		Total
	(in millions)
Revolving — Consumer
Owned since inception	$	1,254	$	118	$	40	$	1,412	$	1,302	$	153	$	48	$	1,503
Purchased	389		58		23		470		447		88		35		570
Revolving — SMB
Owned since inception	253		20		5		278		246		26		5		277
Purchased	32		6		2		40		34		9		3		46
Fixed-term — Large Enterprise
Owned since inception	1,154		25		6		1,185		1,077		47		7		1,131
Fixed-term — Public
Owned since inception	423		17		2		442		463		12		1		476
Fixed-term — SMB
Owned since inception	395		7		2		404		371		11		3		385
Total customer receivables, gross	$	3,900	$	251	$	80	$	4,231	$	3,940	$	346	$	102	$	4,388



	April 29, 2011								January 28, 2011
	FICO 720+		FICO 660 to 719		FICO < 660		Total		FICO 720+		FICO 660 to 719		FICO < 660		Total
	(in millions)
Revolving — Consumer
Owned since inception	$	229	$	397	$	786	$	1,412	$	251	$	415	$	837	$	1,503
Purchased	$	43	$	108	$	319	$	470	$	50	$	127	$	393	$	570



	April 29, 2011								January 28, 2011
	Investment		Non-Investment		Sub-Standard		Total		Investment		Non-Investment		Sub-Standard		Total
	(in millions)
Fixed-term — Large Enterprise
Owned since inception	$	874	$	189	$	122	$	1,185	$	806	$	166	$	159	$	1,131
Fixed-term — Public
Owned since inception	$	402	$	32	$	8	$	442	$	438	$	30	$	8	$	476



	April 29, 2011								January 28, 2011
	Higher		Mid		Lower		Total		Higher		Mid		Lower		Total
	(in millions)
Revolving — SMB
Owned since inception	$	105	$	85	$	88	$	278	$	108	$	85	$	84	$	277
Purchased	$	14	$	21	$	5	$	40	$	16	$	24	$	6	$	46
Fixed-term — SMB
Owned since inception	$	40	$	128	$	236	$	404	$	62	$	129	$	194	$	385


	Three Months			Six Months
	Ended			Ended
	July 31,			July 31,
	2009			2009
	(in millions)
Retained interest:
Retained interest at beginning of period	$	504		$	396
Issuances		125			252
Distributions from conduits		(25	)		(35	)
Net accretion		14			24
Change in fair value for the period		3			(16	)
Impact of special purpose entity consolidation		(502	)		(502	)

Retained interest at end of period	$	119		$	119


	Gain (Loss)
	Recognized
	in Accumulated			Location of Gain (Loss)	Gain (Loss)
Derivatives in	OCI, Net			Reclassified	Reclassified			Location of Gain (Loss)	Gain (Loss)
Cash Flow	of Tax, on			from Accumulated	from Accumulated			Recognized in Income	Recognized in
Hedging	Derivatives			OCI into Income	OCI into Income			on Derivative	Income on Derivative
Relationships	(Effective Portion)			(Effective Portion)	(Effective Portion)			(Ineffective Portion)	(Ineffective Portion)
(in millions)

For the three months ended July 30, 2010
Foreign exchange				Total net revenue	$	77
contracts	$	(60	)	Total cost of net revenue		(10	)
Interest rate contracts		1		Interest and other, net		-		Interest and other, net	$	-

Total	$	(59	)		$	67			$	-


For the three months ended July 31, 2009
Foreign exchange				Total net revenue	$	(147	)
contracts	$	(289	)	Total cost of net revenue		(23	)	Interest and other, net	$	-

Total	$	(289	)		$	(170	)		$	-


For the six months ended July 30, 2010
Foreign exchange				Total net revenue	$	123
contracts	$	(19	)	Total cost of net revenue		(28	)
Interest rate contracts		1		Interest and other, net		-		Interest and other, net	$	-

Total	$	(18	)		$	95			$	-


For the six months ended July 31, 2009
Foreign exchange				Total net revenue	$	74
contracts	$	(413	)	Total cost of net revenue		(10	)	Interest and other, net	$	-

Total	$	(413	)		$	64			$	-



Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationships	Gain (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated OCI, Net of Tax, on Derivatives (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)	Gain (Loss) Reclassified from Accumulated OCI into Income (Effective Portion)			Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)	Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)
(in millions)
For the three months ended April 29, 2011
				Total net revenue	$	(156	)
Foreign exchange contracts	$	(242	)	Total cost of net revenue	(18		)
Interest rate contracts	—			Interest and other, net	—			Interest and other, net	$	—
Total	$	(242	)		$	(174	)		$	—


For the three months ended April 30, 2010
				Total net revenue	$	46
Foreign exchange contracts	$	40		Total cost of net revenue	(18		)	Interest and other, net	$	1
Total	$	40			$	28			$	1



	April 29, 2011
	Other Current Assets			Other Non- Current Assets		Other Current Liabilities			Other Non-Current Liabilities			Total Fair Value
				(in millions)
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position	$	26		$	1	$	49		$	—		$	76
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position	(59		)	—		(224		)	—			(283		)
Interest rate contracts in a liability position	—			—		—			(2		)	(2		)
Net asset (liability)	(33		)	1		(175		)	(2		)	(209		)
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position	101			—		59			—			160
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position	(9		)	—		(40		)	—			(49		)
Interest rate contracts in a liability position	—			—		—			(1		)	(1		)
Net asset (liability)	92			—		19			(1		)	110
Total derivatives at fair value	$	59		$	1	$	(156	)	$	(3	)	$	(99	)

	January 28, 2011
	Other Current Assets			Other Non- Current Assets		Other Current Liabilities			Other Non-Current Liabilities			Total Fair Value
				(in millions)
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position	$	81		$	1	$	34		$	—		$	116
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position	(86		)	—		(59		)	—			(145		)
Interest rate contracts in a liability position	—			—		—			(2		)	(2		)
Net asset (liability)	(5		)	1		(25		)	(2		)	(31		)
Derivatives not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Foreign exchange contracts in an asset position	52			—		15			—			67
Foreign exchange contracts in a liability position	(21		)	—		(15		)	—			(36		)
Interest rate contracts in a liability position	—			—		—			(1		)	(1		)
Net asset (liability)	31			—		—			(1		)	30
Total derivatives at fair value	$	26		$	1	$	(25	)	$	(3	)	$	(1	)


					Small and
	Large				Medium
	Enterprise		Public		Business		Consumer		Total
	(in millions)
Balance at January 29, 2010	$	1,361	$	2,026	$	389	$	298	$	4,074
Goodwill acquired during the period		58		70		53		-		181
Adjustments		1		5		-		3		9

Balance at July 30, 2010	$	1,420	$	2,101	$	442	$	301	$	4,264



	Three Months Ended
	April 29, 2011			% Change		April 30, 2010
	(in millions, except percentages)
GAAP gross margin	$	3,432		36	%	$	2,516
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Amortization of intangibles	71					68
Severance and facility actions	5					29
Acquisition-related	3					1
Non-GAAP gross margin	$	3,511		34	%	$	2,614

GAAP operating expenses	$	2,220		11	%	$	1,997
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Amortization of intangibles	(21		)			(20		)
Severance and facility actions	(14		)			(28		)
Acquisition-related	(50		)			(19		)
Other fees and settlements	—					(140		)
Non-GAAP operating expenses	$	2,135		19	%	$	1,790

GAAP operating income	$	1,212		134	%	$	519
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Amortization of intangibles	92					88
Severance and facility actions	19					57
Acquisition-related	53					20
Other fees and settlements	—					140
Non-GAAP operating income	$	1,376		67	%	$	824

GAAP net income	$	945		177	%	$	341
Non-GAAP adjustments:
Amortization of intangibles	92					88
Severance and facility actions	19					57
Acquisition-related	53					20
Other fees and settlements	—					140
Aggregate adjustment for income taxes	(59		)			(62		)
Non-GAAP net income	$	1,050		80	%	$	584

GAAP earnings per share - diluted	$	0.49		188	%	$	0.17
Non-GAAP adjustments per share - diluted	0.06					0.13
Non-GAAP earnings per share - diluted	$	0.55		83	%	$	0.30


					Total		Approximate
					Number of		Dollar Value
					Shares		of Shares That
					Purchased		May Yet Be
					as Part of		Purchased
	Total		Weighted		Publicly		Under the
	Number of		Average		Announced		Announced
	Shares		Price Paid		Plans or		Plans or
Period	Purchased^(a)		per Share		Programs^(b)		Programs^(b)
	(in millions, except average price paid per share)

May 1, 2010, through May 28, 2010		-	$	-		-	$	4,343
May 29, 2010, through June 25, 2010		14	$	13.87		14	$	4,143
June 26, 2010, through July 30, 2010		-	$	-		-	$	4,143

Total		14	$	13.87		14


Exhibit
No.				Description of Exhibit
	3	.1†	—	Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended
	3	.2†	—	Restated Bylaws, as amended and effective as of August 16, 2010
	4	.1	—	Indenture, dated as of April 27, 1998, between Dell Computer Corporation and Chase Bank of Texas, National Association (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 28, 1998, Commission FileNo. 0-17017)
	4	.2	—	Officers’ Certificate pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture establishing the terms of Dell’s 7.10% Senior Debentures Due 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.4 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 28, 1998, Commission FileNo. 0-17017)
	4	.3	—	Form of Dell’s 7.10% Senior Debentures Due 2028 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.6 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 28, 1998, Commission FileNo. 0-17017)
	4	.4	—	Indenture, dated as of April 17, 2008, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (including the form of notes) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 17, 2008, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
	4	.5	—	Indenture, dated April 6, 2009, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 6, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
	4	.6	—	First Supplemental Indenture, dated April 6, 2009, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 6, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
	4	.7	—	Form of 5.625% Notes due 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed April 6, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
	4	.8	—	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 15, 2009, between Dell Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed June 15, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
	4	.9	—	Form of 3.375% Notes due 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed June 15, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
	4	.10	—	Form of 5.875% Notes due 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 of Dell’s Current Report onForm 8-K filed June 15, 2009, Commission fileNo. 0-17017)
	12	.1†	—	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
	31	.1†	—	Certification of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	31	.2†	—	Certification of Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant toRule 13a-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
	32	.1††	—	Certifications of Michael S. Dell, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Brian T. Gladden, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002