UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
   
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended January 1,April 2, 2011
OR
   
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Transition Period From ________ to ________
Commission File Number: 1-9929
Insteel Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
North Carolina 56-0674867
   
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
   
1373 Boggs Drive, Mount Airy, North Carolina 27030
   
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (336) 786-2141
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
   
Yesþ Noo
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yeso Noo
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
       
Large accelerated filero Accelerated filerþ Non-accelerated filero Smaller reporting companyo
    (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  
     Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
   
Yeso Noþ
     The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock as of February 7,April 25, 2011 was 17,579,037.17,614,100.
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
     
     
    
  3 
  4 
  5 
  6 
  7 
     
  18 
     
  2628 
     
  2728 
     
     
  2729 
     
  2729 
     
  2829 
     
  2830 
     
  2931 
     
  3032 
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2

2


PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.Financial Statements
Item 1. Financial Statements
INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands except for per share data)
(Unaudited)
                        
 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 
 January 1, January 2,  April 2, April 3, April 2, April 3, 
 2011 2010  2011 2010 2011 2010 
Net sales $52,306 $41,201  $86,933 $52,268 $139,239 $93,469 
Cost of sales 52,441 37,526  75,330 46,049 127,771 83,575 
Inventory write-downs  1,933     1,933 
            �� 
Gross profit (loss)  (135) 1,742 
Gross profit 11,603 6,219 11,468 7,961 
Selling, general and administrative expense 4,168 3,742  4,523 4,182 8,691 7,924 
Restructuring charges 2,213  6,603  
Acquisition costs 2,750   768  3,518  
Restructuring charges 4,390  
Bargain purchase gain  (500)   (500)  
Other income, net  (13)  (153)  (56)  (97)  (69)  (250)
Interest expense 151 148  253 147 404 295 
Interest income  (13)  (12)  (6)  (14)  (19)  (26)
              
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes  (11,568)  (1,983)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes 4,408 2,001  (7,160) 18 
Income taxes  (3,940)  (860) 1,789 357  (2,151)  (503)
              
Loss from continuing operations  (7,628)  (1,123)
Loss from discontinued operations net of income taxes of $ - and ($8)   (13)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations 2,619 1,644  (5,009) 521 
Loss from discontinued operations net of income taxes of $ - , ($6), $ - and ($14)   (10)   (23)
              
Net loss $(7,628) $(1,136)
Net earnings (loss) $2,619 $1,634 $(5,009) $498 
              
  
Per share amounts:  
Basic:  
Loss from continuing operations $(0.44) $(0.07)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations $0.15 $0.09 $(0.29) $0.03 
Loss from discontinued operations        
              
Net loss $(0.44) $(0.07)
Net earnings (loss) $0.15 $0.09 $(0.29) $0.03 
              
  
Diluted:  
Loss from continuing operations $(0.44) $(0.07)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations $0.15 $0.09 $(0.29) $0.03 
Loss from discontinued operations        
              
Net loss $(0.44) $(0.07)
Net earnings (loss) $0.15 $0.09 $(0.29) $0.03 
              
  
Cash dividends declared $0.03 $0.03  $0.03 $0.03 $0.06 $0.06 
              
  
Weighted average shares outstanding  
Basic 17,511 17,410  17,551 17,458 17,531 17,434 
              
Diluted 17,511 17,410  17,802 17,647 17,531 17,643 
              
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3


INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
                
 (Unaudited)    (Unaudited)   
 January 1, October 2,  April 2, October 2, 
 2011 2010  2011 2010 
Assets
  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents $2,787 $45,935  $3,893 $45,935 
Accounts receivable, net 22,356 24,970  37,418 24,970 
Inventories, net 61,062 43,919  61,717 43,919 
Prepaid expenses and other 4,961 3,931 
Other current assets 4,930 3,931 
          
Total current assets 91,166 118,755  107,958 118,755 
Property, plant and equipment, net 91,521 58,653  93,169 58,653 
Other assets 7,583 5,097  5,770 5,097 
          
Total assets $190,270 $182,505  $206,897 $182,505 
          
  
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
  
Current liabilities:  
Accounts payable $22,342 $20,689  $35,870 $20,689 
Accrued expenses 8,316 5,929  8,555 5,929 
Current portion of long-term debt 675   675  
Current liabilities of discontinued operations  210   210 
          
Total current liabilities 31,333 26,828  45,100 26,828 
Long-term debt 12,825   12,825  
Other liabilities 5,852 7,521  5,970 7,521 
Long-term liabilities of discontinued operations  280   280 
Commitments and contingencies  
Shareholders’ equity:  
Common stock 17,579 17,579  17,614 17,579 
Additional paid-in capital 46,489 45,950  47,105 45,950 
Retained earnings 78,501 86,656  80,592 86,656 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (2,309)  (2,309)  (2,309)  (2,309)
          
Total shareholders’ equity 140,260 147,876  143,002 147,876 
          
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $190,270 $182,505  $206,897 $182,505 
          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

4


INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
                
 Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
 January 1, January 2,  April 2, April 3, 
 2011 2010  2011 2010 
Cash Flows From Operating Activities:
  
Net loss $(7,628) $(1,136)
Net earnings (loss) $(5,009) $498 
Loss from discontinued operations  13   23 
          
Loss from continuing operations  (7,628)  (1,123)
Adjustments to reconcile loss from continuing operations to net cash used for operating
activities of continuing operations:
 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations  (5,009) 521 
Adjustments to reconcile earnings (loss) from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations: 
Depreciation and amortization 2,054 1,715  4,553 3,458 
Amortization of capitalized financing costs 20 125  40 249 
Stock-based compensation expense 539 487  1,182 1,103 
Asset impairment charges 2,868  3,451  
Inventory write-downs  1,933   1,933 
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation   (11)  (81)  (3)
Loss on sale of property, plant and equipment  11  16 11 
Deferred income taxes  (3,969)  (345)  (2,276)  (217)
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance over premiums paid  (248)  
Gain from life insurance proceeds  (357)  
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies over premiums paid  (298)  (284)
Net changes in assets and liabilities (net of assets and liabilities acquired):  
Accounts receivable, net 2,614 3,513   (12,448)  (1,922)
Inventories 3,442  (1,840) 2,787 4,449 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  (4,038)  (14,525) 9,360  (4,076)
Other changes  (745) 289   (878) 14,258 
          
Total adjustments 2,537  (8,648) 5,051 18,959 
          
Net cash used for operating activities — continuing operations  (5,091)  (9,771)
Net cash provided by operating activities — continuing operations 42 19,480 
Net cash used for operating activities — discontinued operations   (29)   (40)
          
Net cash used for operating activities  (5,091)  (9,800)
Net cash provided by operating activities 42 19,440 
          
  
Cash Flows From Investing Activities:
  
Acquisition of business  (37,588)    (37,308)  
Capital expenditures  (506)  (327)  (4,902)  (902)
Proceeds from life insurance claims 1,063  
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equiment 18  
Increase in cash surrender value of life insurance policies   (111)  (425)  (410)
          
Net cash used for investing activities — continuing operations  (38,094)  (438)  (41,554)  (1,312)
          
Net cash used for investing activities  (38,094)  (438)  (41,554)  (1,312)
          
  
Cash Flows From Financing Activities:
  
Proceeds from long-term debt 109 52  5,908 150 
Principal payments on long-term debt  (109)  (52)  (5,908)  (150)
Cash received from exercise of stock options  17  13 84 
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation  11  81 3 
Cash dividends paid   (526)  (527)  (1,053)
Other 37  (32)  (97)  (1)
          
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities — continuing operations 37  (530)
Net cash used for financing activities — continuing operations  (530)  (967)
          
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities 37  (530)
Net cash used for financing activities  (530)  (967)
          
  
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (43,148)  (10,768)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (42,042) 17,161 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 45,935 35,102  45,935 35,102 
          
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $2,787 $24,334  $3,893 $52,263 
          
  
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
  
Cash paid during the period for:  
Interest $36 $24  $66 $46 
Income taxes 709   760 2 
Non-cash investing and financing activities:  
Purchases of property, plant and equipment in accounts payable 73 92  441 98 
Declaration of cash dividends to be paid 527   527  
Restricted stock surrendered for withholding taxes payable  7  86 52 
Note payable issued as consideration for business acquired 13,500   13,500  
Post-closing purchase price adjustment for business acquired 500  
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

5


INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
                                                
 Accumulated    Accumulated   
 Additional Other Total  Additional Other Total 
 Common Stock Paid-In Retained Comprehensive Shareholders’  Common Stock Paid-In Retained Comprehensive Shareholders’ 
 Shares Amount Capital Earnings Loss Equity  Shares Amount Capital Earnings Loss Equity 
Balance at October 2, 2010 17,579 $17,579 $45,950 $86,656 $(2,309) $147,876  17,579 $17,579 $45,950 $86,656 $(2,309) $147,876 
                          
Comprehensive loss:  
Net loss  (7,628)  (7,628)  (5,009)  (5,009)
      
Comprehensive loss  (7,628)  (5,009)
Stock options exercised 12 12 1 13 
Vesting of restricted stock units 30 30  (30)  
Compensation expense associated with stock-based plans 539 539  1,182 1,182 
Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation 81 81 
Restricted stock surrendered for withholding taxes payable  (7)  (7)  (79)  (86)
Cash dividends declared  (527)  (527)  (1,055)  (1,055)
                          
Balance at January 1, 2011 17,579 $17,579 $46,489 $78,501 $(2,309) $140,260 
Balance at April 2, 2011 17,614 $17,614 $47,105 $80,592 $(2,309) $143,002 
                          
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

6


INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) Basis of Presentation
     The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of Insteel Industries, Inc. (“we,” “us,” “our,” “the Company” or “Insteel”) have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in the audited financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. The October 2, 2010 consolidated balance sheet was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. These financial statements should therefore be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2010 included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.
     The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of results for these interim periods. The results of operations for the three-monthsix-month period ended January 1,April 2, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending October 1, 2011 or future periods.
     On November 19, 2010, the Company purchased certain of the assets and assumed certain of the liabilities of Ivy Steel and Wire, Inc. (“Ivy”) (see Note 143 to the consolidated financial statements).
     The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and has concluded that there are no significant events that occurred subsequent to the balance sheet date but prior to the filing of this report that would have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.
(2) Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an update that clarifies the guidance provided in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805,Business Combinations, regarding the disclosure requirements for the pro forma presentation of revenue and earnings related to a business combination. The Company elected to early adopt this guidance during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.
(3) Business Combination
     On November 19, 2010, the Company purchased certain of the assets and assumed certain of the liabilities of Ivy for a preliminary purchase price of approximately $51.1 million, consisting of $37.6 million of cash and a $13.5 million secured subordinated promissory note payable to Ivy (see Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements)(the “Ivy Acquisition”). Subsequent to the date of the Ivy Acquisition, the Company recorded $780,000 of post-closing adjustments which reduced the final adjusted purchase price to $50.3 million.
     Ivy was one of the nation’s largest producers of welded wire reinforcement and wire products for concrete construction applications. The Company believes the addition of Ivy’s facilities will enhance the Company’s competitiveness in its Northeast, Midwest and Florida markets, in addition to providing a platform to serve the West Coast markets more effectively. The assets purchased included Ivy’s production facilities in Arizona, Florida, Missouri and Pennsylvania; production equipment in Texas; and certain related inventories. In addition, the Company assumed certain of Ivy’s accounts payable and employee benefit obligations.
     Following is a summary of the Company’s final allocation of the adjusted purchase price to the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of the Ivy Acquisition:

7


     
(In thousands)    
Assets acquired:    
Inventories $20,585 
Property, plant and equipment  37,211 
    
Total assets acquired $57,796 
    
     
Liabilities assumed:    
Accounts payable $6,263 
Accrued expenses  725 
    
Total liabilities assumed  6,988 
    
Net assets acquired  50,808 
Purchase price  50,308 
    
Bargain purchase gain $500 
    
     Accounting standards require that when the fair value of the net assets acquired exceeds the purchase price, resulting in a bargain purchase gain, the acquirer must reassess the reasonableness of the values assigned to all of the assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration transferred. The Company has performed such a reassessment and has concluded that the values assigned for the Ivy Acquisition are reasonable. Consequently, the Company has recorded a $500,000 bargain purchase gain on the Ivy Acquisition.
     The Ivy Acquisition was accounted for as a business purchase pursuant to ASC Topic 805,Business Combinations. Acquisition and integration costs are not included as components of consideration transferred, but are accounted for as expenses in the period in which the costs are incurred (See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements).
     Following the Ivy Acquisition, net sales for the Ivy facilities for the three- and six-month periods ended April 2, 2011 were approximately $18.9 million and $23.4 million, respectively. The actual amount of net sales specifically attributable to the Ivy Acquisition, however, cannot be quantified due to the integration actions that have been taken by the Company involving the transfer of business between the former Ivy facilities and the Company’s existing facilities. The Company has determined that the presentation of Ivy’s earnings for the three- and six-month periods ended April 2, 2011 is impractical due to the integration of Ivy’s operations into the Company following the Ivy Acquisition.
     The following unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information reflects the combined results of operations of the Company had the Ivy Acquisition occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2010. The pro forma information reflects certain adjustments related to the Ivy Acquisition, including adjusted depreciation expense based on the fair value of the assets acquired, interest expense related to the secured subordinated promissory note and an appropriate adjustment in the current period for the acquisition-related costs. The pro forma information does not reflect any operating efficiencies or potential cost savings which may result from the Ivy Acquisition. Accordingly, this pro forma information is for illustrative purposes and is not intended to represent or be indicative of the actual results of operations of the combined company that may have been achieved had the Ivy Acquisition occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2010, nor is it intended to represent or be indicative of future results of operations. The pro forma combined results of operations for the current and comparative prior year periods are as follows:
                 
  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  April 2,  April 3,  April 2,  April 3, 
(In thousands) 2011  2010  2011  2010 
Net sales $86,933  $75,023  $155,950  $135,378 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes  4,671   (2,848)  (6,400)  (13,452)
Net earnings (loss)  2,775   (1,886)  (4,436)  (8,366)
(4) Restructuring Charges and Acquisition Costs
Restructuring charges.Subsequent to the Ivy Acquisition, the Company elected to proceed with the consolidation of certain of its welded wire reinforcement operations to reduce its operating costs, including the closure of facilities in Wilmington, Delaware and Houston, Texas. These actions were in response to the close proximity of Ivy’s facilities in Hazleton, Pennsylvania and Houston, Texas to the Company’s existing facilities in Wilmington, Delaware and Dayton, Texas. The Houston plant closure was completed in December 2010 and the Wilmington plant closure is expected to be completed by the end of April 2011.

8


     Following is a summary of the restructuring activities and associated costs that were incurred during the six-month period ended April 2, 2011:
                     
  Severance             
  and other  Asset  Facility  Equipment    
(In thousands) employee costs  impairment  closure costs  relocation  Total 
Restructuring charges $979  $2,868  $533  $10  $4,390 
Cash payments  (310)     (75)  (10)  (395)
Non-cash charges     (2,868)        (2,868)
                
Liability as of January 1, 2011 $669  $  $458  $  $1,127 
                
Restructuring charges  1,176   584   224   229   2,213 
Cash payments  (1,486)     (367)  (145)  (1,998)
Non-cash charges     (584)        (584)
                
Liability as of April 2, 2011 $359  $  $315  $84  $758 
                
     As of April 2, 2011, the Company recorded a liability of $758,000 on its consolidated balance sheet for restructuring liabilities, including $84,000 in accounts payable and $674,000 in accrued expenses. The Company currently expects to incur approximately $1.0 million of additional restructuring charges for equipment relocation and employee separation costs over the remainder of the current fiscal year and that substantially all of the cash payments related to the restructuring charges will be made before the end of the current fiscal year.
Acquisition costs.During the three- and six-month periods ended April 2, 2011, the Company recorded $768,000 and $3.5 million, respectively, of acquisition-related costs associated with the Ivy Acquisition for advisory, accounting, legal and other professional fees. The Company does not expect to incur any additional acquisition costs related to the Ivy Acquisition over the remainder of the fiscal year.
(5) Fair Value Measurements
     Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The authoritative guidance for fair value measurements establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that encourages an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets.
Level 3 — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities, including certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

7


     As of January 1,April 2, 2011, the Company held financial assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The financial assets held by the Company and the fair value hierarchy used to determine their fair values are as follows:
                        
 Quoted Prices    Quoted Prices   
 in Active Observable  in Active Observable 
 Markets Inputs  Markets Inputs 
(In thousands) Total (Level 1) (Level 2)  Total (Level 1) (Level 2) 
Current assets:  
Cash equivalents $3,732 $3,732 $  $3,621 $3,621 $ 
  
Other assets:  
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies 4,736  4,736  4,634  4,634 
              
Total $8,468 $3,732 $4,736  $8,255 $3,621 $4,634 
              

9


     Cash equivalents, which include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less, are classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The carrying amount of the Company’s cash equivalents, which consist of investments in money market funds, approximates fair value due to their short maturities. Cash surrender value of life insurance policies are classified as Level 2. The fair value of the life insurance policies was determined by the underwriting insurance company’s valuation models and represents the guaranteed value the Company would receive upon surrender of these policies as of January 1,April 2, 2011.
     As of January 1,April 2, 2011, the Company had no nonfinancial assets that are required to be measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis other than the assets and liabilities acquired from Ivy (see Note 143 to the consolidated financial statements) that were acquired at fair value. The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximatesapproximate fair value due to the short-term maturities of these financial instruments. The Company believes that the carrying amount of the $13.5 million secured subordinated promissory note approximates fair value based on comparable debt with similar terms, conditions and proximity to the issue date, which would be considered a level 2 input.
(4)(6) Discontinued Operations
     In April 2006, the Company decided to exit the industrial wire business with the closure of its Fredericksburg, Virginia facility, which manufactured tire bead wire and other industrial wire for commercial and industrial applications. The Company’s decision was based on the weakening in the business outlook for the facility and the expected continuation of difficult market conditions and reduced operating levels. Manufacturing activities at the Virginia facility ceased in June 2006 and the Company has liquidated the remaining assets of the business.business in fiscal 2010. The results of operations and related non-recurring closure costs associated with the industrial wire business have been reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.the prior year period.
     Liabilities of discontinued operations as of January 1, 2011 and October 2, 2010 are as follows:
            
 January 1, October 2,  October 2, 
(In thousands) 2011 2010  2010 
Liabilities:
  
Current liabilities:  
Accrued expenses $ $210  $210 
        
Total current liabilities  210  210 
Other liabilities  280  280 
        
Total liabilities $ $490  $490 
        
(5)(7) Stock-Based Compensation
     Under the Company’s equity incentive plans, employees and directors may be granted stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units and performance awards. As of January 1,April 2, 2011, there were 409,000286,000 shares available for future grants under the plans.

8


     Stock option awards.Under the Company’s equity incentive plans, employees and directors may be granted options to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock at the fair market value on the date of the grant. Options granted under these plans generally vest over three years and expire ten years from the date of the grant. Compensation expense and excess tax benefitsdeficiencies (benefits) associated with stock options for the three-monththree- and six-month periods ended January 1,April 2, 2011 and January 2,April 3, 2010 are as follows:
                        
 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 
 January 1, January 2,  April 2, April 3, April 2, April 3, 
(in thousands) 2011 2010 
(In thousands) 2011 2010 2011 2010 
Stock options:  
Compensation expense $227 $213  $280 $268 $507 $481 
Excess tax benefits  11 
Excess tax deficiencies (benefits)  (81) 8  (81)  (3)
     As of January 1,April 2, 2011, the remaining unamortized compensation cost related to unvested stock option awards was $654,000,$803,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.241.30 years.
     The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using a Monte Carlo valuation model based upon assumptions that are evaluated and revised, as necessary, to reflect market conditions and actual historical experience.

10


The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant. The dividend yield is calculated based on the Company’s annual dividend as of the option grant date. The expected volatility is derived using a term structure based on historical volatility and the volatility implied by exchange-traded options on the Company’s common stock. The expected term for options is based on the results of a Monte Carlo simulation model, using the model’s estimated fair value as an input to the Black-Scholes-Merton model, and then solving for the expected term. There were no
     The estimated fair value of stock option grantsoptions granted during the three-monththree- and six-month periods ended January 1,April 2, 2011 and January 2, 2010.April 3, 2010 was $5.86 and $4.62, respectively, based on the following assumptions:
         
  Six Months Ended 
  April 2,  April 3, 
  2011  2010 
Risk-free interest rate  2.40%  2.69%
Dividend yield  0.97%  1.29%
Expected volatility  56.49%  60.68%
Expected term (in years)  5.11   5.71 
     The following table summarizes stock option activity for the three-monthsix-month period ended January 1,April 2, 2011:
                                                   
 Contractual Aggregate  Contractual Aggregate 
 Options Exercise Price Per Share Term - Intrinsic  Options Exercise Price Per Share Term - Intrinsic 
 Outstanding Weighted Weighted Value  Outstanding Weighted Weighted Value 
 (in thousands) Range Average Average (in thousands)  (in thousands) Range Average Average (in thousands) 
Outstanding at October 2, 2010 847 $0.18   - $20.27 $10.63  847 $0.18 - $20.27 $10.63 
Granted     -    77 12.43 - 12.43 12.43 
Expired     -      -   
Exercised     -     (12) 1.06 - 1.06 1.06 
      
Outstanding at January 1, 2011 847 0.18   - 20.27 10.63 7.09 years $2,797 
Outstanding at April 2, 2011 912 0.18 - 20.27 10.91 7.19 years $3,737 
  
Vested and anticipated to vest in the future at January 1, 2011 828 10.64 7.06 years 2,734 
Vested and anticipated to vest in the future at April 2, 2011 894 10.91 7.16 years 3,665 
  
Exercisable at January 1, 2011 461 11.28 5.78 years 1,530 
Exercisable at April 2, 2011 571 11.16 6.11 years 2,372 
     Restricted stock awards.Under the Company’s equity incentive plans, employees and directors may be granted restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) which are valued based upon the fair market value on the date of the grant. Restricted stock granted under these plans generally vests one to three years from the date of the grant. There were no restricted stock grants during the three-monththree- and six-month periods ended January 1,April 2, 2011 and January 2,April 3, 2010. Amortization expense for restricted stock for the three-monththree- and six-month periods ended January 1,April 2, 2011 and January 2,April 3, 2010 is as follows:
                        
 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 
 January 1, January 2,  April 2, April 3, April 2, April 3, 
(In thousands) 2011 2010  2011 2010 2011 2010 
Amortization expense $66 $130  $50 $139 $116 $269 
     As of January 1,April 2, 2011, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested restricted stock awards was $100,000,$50,000, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 0.540.38 years.

9

     During the six-month periods ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, 40,580 and 26,620 shares, respectively, of employee restricted stock awards vested. Upon vesting, employees have the option of remitting payment for the minimum tax obligation to the Company or net-share settling such that the Company will withhold shares with a value equivalent to the respective employee’s minimum tax obligation. A total of 6,757 and 5,225 shares were withheld during the six-month periods ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively, to satisfy employees’ minimum tax obligations.


     The following table summarizes restricted stock activity during the three-monthsix-month period ended January 1,April 2, 2011:

11


                
 Weighted  Weighted 
 Restricted Average  Restricted Average 
 Stock Awards Grant Date  Stock Awards Grant Date 
(Share amounts in thousands) Outstanding Fair Value  Outstanding Fair Value 
Balance, October 2, 2010 67 $13.37  67 $13.37 
Granted      
Released     (40) 11.15 
      
Balance, January 1, 2011 67 $13.37 
Balance, April 2, 2011 27 $16.69 
      
     Restricted stock units.On January 21, 2009, the Executive Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved a change in the equity compensation program such that awards of restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to employees and directors would be made in lieu of awards of restricted stock. RSUs granted under these plans are valued based upon the fair market value on the date of the grant and provide for a dividend equivalent payment which is included in compensation expense. The vesting period for RSUs is generally one to three years from the date of the grant. RSUs do not have voting rights. There were no RSU grants duringand amortization expense for the three-monththree- and six-month periods ended January 1,April 2, 2011 and January 2, 2010. Amortization expense for RSUs for the three-month periods ended January 1, 2011 and January 2,April 3, 2010, isrespectively, are as follows:
                        
 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 
 January 1, January 2,  April 2, April 3, April 2, April 3, 
(In thousands) 2011 2010  2011 2010 2011 2010 
Restricted stock unit grants: 
Units 52 78 52 78 
Market value $652 $732 $652 $732 
Amortization expense $246 $144  313 209 559 353 
     As of January 1,April 2, 2011, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested RSUs was $929,000,$1.2 million, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average vesting period of 1.611.59 years.
     The following table summarizes RSU activity during the three-monthsix-month period ended January 1,April 2, 2011:
                
 Weighted  Weighted 
 Restricted Average  Restricted Average 
 Stock Units Grant Date  Stock Units Grant Date 
(Unit amounts in thousands) Outstanding Fair Value  Outstanding Fair Value 
Balance, October 2, 2010 239 $9.23  239 $9.23 
Granted    52 12.43 
Released     (30) 9.39 
      
Balance, January 1, 2011 239 $9.23 
Balance, April 2, 2011 261 $9.85 
      
(6)(8) Income Taxes
     The Company has recorded the following amounts for deferred income taxes and accrued income taxes on its consolidated balance sheet as of January 1,April 2, 2011: a current deferred tax asset (net of valuation allowance) of $2.6 million in prepaid expenses and other current assets, a non-current deferred tax asset (net of valuation allowance) of $2.2$0.5 million in other assets, accrued non-current income taxes payable of $54,000$55,000 in other liabilities, and income taxes receivable of $1.3$1.4 million in prepaid expenses and other.other current assets. As of January 1,April 2, 2011, the Company has $27.4$27.3 million of gross state operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”) that begin to expire in 2017, but principally expire in 2017 to 2030. The Company has also recorded deferred tax assets for various state tax credits of $300,000, which will begin to expire in 2014 and principally expire in 2014 to 2019. The effective income tax rate for the three-month period ended January 1,April 2, 2011 was 34.1%40.6% compared with 43.4%17.8% in the same year-ago period as a result of the establishment of a valuation allowance against certain state NOLs and tax credits during the current year period and changes in permanent book versus tax differences primarily related to stock-based compensation.together with a $500,000 increase in the tax refund received in the prior year as the result of changes in the federal tax regulations regarding the carryback of net operating losses.
     The realization of the Company’s deferred income tax assets is entirely dependent upon the Company’s ability to generate future taxable income in applicable jurisdictions. GAAP requires that the Company periodically assess the need to establish a valuation allowance against its deferred income tax assets to the extent that it no longer believes it is more likely than not they will be fully utilized. As of January 1,April 2, 2011 and October 2, 2010, the Company recorded a valuation allowance of $728,000$697,000 and $461,000, respectively, pertaining to various state NOLs and tax credits that were not expected to be utilized.

12


The valuation allowance established by the Company is subject to periodic review and adjustment based on changes in facts and circumstances and would be reduced should the Company utilize the state NOLs and tax credits against which an allowance had been provided or determine that such utilization is more likely than not. The increase in the valuation

10


allowance for the three-monthsix-month period ended January 1,April 2, 2011 is primarily due to a change in the Company’s expectations regarding the future realization of deferred tax assets related to certain state NOLs and tax credits.
     The Company has established contingency reserves for material, known tax exposures, including potential tax audit adjustments. The Company’s tax reserves reflect management’s judgment as to the estimated liabilities that would be incurred in connection with the resolution of these matters. As of January 1,April 2, 2011, the Company had approximately $10,000$9,000 of gross unrecognized tax benefits classified in prepaid expenses and other current assets and $33,000 of gross unrecognized tax benefits classified as other liabilities on its consolidated balance sheet, of which $32,000,$31,000, if recognized, would reduce its income tax rate in future periods. The Company anticipates the gross unrecognized tax benefit of $10,000$9,000 will be resolved during the next twelve months.
     The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. TheAs of April 2, 2011, the Company had accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2011 of $81,000.$80,000.
     The Company files U.S. federal income tax returns as well as state and local income tax returns in various jurisdictions. Federal and various state tax returns filed by the Company subsequent to fiscal year 2006 remain subject to examination together with certain state tax returns filed by the Company subsequent to fiscal year 2003. The Company’s 2007 fiscal year return is currently under examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). Additionally, the IRS is conducting a Joint Committee Review of the 2009 fiscal year return.
(7)(9) Employee Benefit Plans
     Retirement plans.The Company has one defined benefit pension plan, the Insteel Wire Products Company Retirement Income Plan for Hourly Employees, Wilmington, Delaware (the “Delaware Plan”). The Delaware Plan provides benefits for eligible employees based primarily upon years of service and compensation levels. The Delaware Plan was frozen effective September 30, 2008 whereby participants will no longer earn additional service benefits. The Company’s funding policy is to contribute amounts at least equal to those required by law. The Company made a contribution of $68,000contributions totaling $343,000 and $411,000 to the Delaware Plan during the three-month periodthree- and six-month periods ended January 1,April 2, 2011, respectively, and expects to contribute an additional $100,000$67,000 during the remainder of the current fiscal year.
     In February 2011, as part of the planned closure of the Wilmington, Delaware facility, the Company amended the Delaware Plan granting certain participants additional service credit. The amendment resulted in a one-time charge of $306,000 that has been included within the restructuring charges for the three- and six-month periods ended April 2, 2011.
     Net periodic pension costs and related components for the Delaware Plan for the three-monththree- and six-month periods ended January 1,April 2, 2011 and January 2,April 3, 2010 are as follows:
                        
 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 
 January 1, January 2,  April 2, April 3, April 2, April 3, 
(In thousands) 2011 2010  2011 2010 2011 2010 
Interest cost $48 $52  $48 $52 $96 $104 
Expected return on plan assets  (52)  (50)  (52)  (50)  (104)  (100)
Recognized net actuarial loss 58 49  58 49 116 98 
              
Net periodic pension cost $54 $51  $54 $51 $108 $102 
              
     Supplemental employee retirement plan.The Company maintains supplemental employee retirement plans (each, a “SERP”) with certain of its employees (each, a “Participant”). Under the SERPs, if the Participant remains in continuous service with the Company for a period of at least 30 years, the Company will pay to the Participant a supplemental retirement benefit for the 15-year period following the Participant’s retirement equal to 50% of the Participant’s highest average annual base salary for five consecutive years in the 10-year period preceding the Participant’s retirement. If the Participant retires prior to the later of age 65 or the completion of 30 years of continuous service with the Company, but has completed at least 10 years of continuous service with the Company, the amount of the supplemental retirement benefit will be reduced by 1/360th for each month short of 30 years that the Participant was employed by the Company.

1113


     Net periodic benefit costs and related components for the SERPs for the three-monththree- and six-month periods ended January 1,April 2, 2011 and January 2,April 3, 2010 are as follows:
                        
 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 
 January 1, January 2,  April 2, April 3, April 2, April 3, 
(In thousands) 2011 2010  2011 2010 2011 2010 
Service cost $44 $41  $44 $41 $88 $82 
Interest cost 71 70  71 70 142 140 
Amortization of prior service cost 65 64  65 64 130 128 
              
Net periodic benefit cost $180 $175  $180 $175 $360 $350 
              
(8)(10) Long-Term Debt
     Revolving Credit Facility.On June 2, 2010, the Company and each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) which amends and restates in its entirety the previous agreement pertaining to its revolving credit facility that had been in effect since January 2006. The Credit Agreement, which matures on June 2, 2015, provides the Company with up to $75.0 million of financing on the credit facility to supplement its operating cash flow and fund its working capital, capital expenditure, general corporate and growth requirements. As of January 1,April 2, 2011, no borrowings were outstanding on the credit facility, $57.7$70.7 million of additional borrowing capacity was available and outstanding letters of credit totaled $919,000.$1.1 million.
     Advances under the credit facility are limited to the lesser of the revolving credit commitment or a borrowing base amount that is calculated based upon a percentage of eligible receivables and inventories. Interest rates on the revolver are based upon (1) an index rate that is established at the highest of the prime rate, 0.50% plus the federal funds rate or the LIBOR rate plus the excess of the then-applicable margin for LIBOR loans over the then-applicable margin for index rate loans, or (2) at the election of the Company, a LIBOR rate, plus in either case, an applicable interest rate margin. The applicable interest rate margins are adjusted on a quarterly basis based upon the amount of excess availability on the revolver within the range of 0.75% - 1.50% for index rate loans and 2.25% — 3.00% for LIBOR loans. In addition, the applicable interest rate margins would be increased by 2.00% upon the occurrence of certain events of default provided for in the Credit Agreement. Based on the Company’s excess availability as of January 1,April 2, 2011, the applicable interest rate margins on the revolver were 0.75% for index rate loans and 2.25% for LIBOR loans.
     The Company’s ability to borrow available amounts under the revolving credit facility will be restricted or eliminated in the event of certain covenant breaches, events of default or if the Company is unable to make certain representations and warranties provided for in the Credit Agreement.
     Financial Covenants
     The terms of the Credit Agreement require the Company to maintain a Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (as defined in the Credit Agreement) of not less than 1.10 at the end of each fiscal quarter for the twelve-month period then ended when the amount of excess availability on the revolving credit facility is less than $10.0 million. As of January 1,April 2, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of the financial covenants under the Credit Agreement.
     Negative Covenants
     In addition, the terms of the Credit Agreement restrict the Company’s ability to, among other things: engage in certain business combinations or divestitures; make investments in or loans to third parties, unless certain conditions are met with respect to such investments or loans; pay cash dividends or repurchase shares of the Company’s stock subject to certain minimum borrowing availability requirements; incur or assume indebtedness; issue securities; enter into certain transactions with affiliates of the Company; or permit liens to encumber the Company’s property and assets. As of January 1,April 2, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of the negative covenants under the Credit Agreement.
     Events of Default
     Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, an event of default will occur with respect to the Company upon the occurrence of, among other things: defaults or breaches under the loan documents, subject in certain cases to cure periods; defaults or breaches by the Company or any of its subsidiaries under any agreement resulting in the acceleration of amounts

12


above certain thresholds or payment defaults above certain thresholds; certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency with

14


respect to the Company; certain entries of judgment against the Company or any of its subsidiaries, which are not covered by insurance; or a change of control of the Company.
     Amortization of capitalized financing costs associated with the credit facility was $20,000 and $125,000 for the three-month periods ended January 1,April 2, 2011 and JanuaryApril 3, 2010, respectively, and $40,000 and $249,000 for the six-month periods ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively. Accumulated amortization of capitalized financing costs was $4.0 million as of January 1,April 2, 2011 and October 2, 2010.
     Subordinated Note.As part of the consideration for purchasing certain of the assets of Ivy Acquisition, on November 19, 2010 (the “Ivy Acquisition” — see(see Note 143 to the consolidated financial statements) the Company entered into a $13.5 million secured subordinated promissory note (the “Note”) payable to Ivy over five years. The Note requires semi-annual interest payments in arrears, and annual principal payments payable on November 19th of each year during the period 2011 — 2015. The Note bears interest on the unpaid principal balance at a fixed rate of 6.00% per annum and is collateralized by certain of the real property and equipment acquired from Ivy. Based on the terms of the Note, the Company expects to make cash payments of approximately $405,000 for interest and no principal payments during fiscal 2011. As of January 1,April 2, 2011, $675,000 of the outstanding balance on the Note is recorded as the current portion of long-term debt on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.
     As of January 1,April 2, 2011, the aggregate maturities of the Note are as follows:
     
Fiscal years(s) (In thousands) 
2012 $675 
2013  675 
2014  675 
2015  5,737 
2016  5,738 
    
Total future maturities $13,500 
Less: Current portion  (675)
    
  $12,825 
    
     The scheduled principal payments will become immediately due and payable together with interest in the event of certain covenant breaches, events of default or if the Company is unable to make certain representations and warranties provided for in the Note. Additionally, there are certain non-financial covenants associated with the Note that require the Company to effect its corporate existence and all material rights and grant a perfected, first priority security interest in all of the real and personal property representing collateral for the Note. The terms of the Note provide that an event of default will occur with respect to the Company upon the occurrence of, among other things: defaults or breaches under the loan document, subject in certain cases to cure periods; certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency with respect to the Company; or a change of control of the Company. As of January 1,April 2, 2011, the Company was in compliance with all of the covenants under the Note.
(9)(11) Earnings (Loss) Per Share
     Effective October 4, 2009, the Company adopted certain provisions of ASC Topic 260,Earnings Per Share, which requires unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends (whether paid or unpaid) to be treated as participating securities and included in the computation of basic earnings per share. The Company’s participating securities are its unvested restricted stock awards. As required under the provisions that were adopted, prior periods have been retrospectively adjusted. Because the Company’s unvested RSAs do not contractually participate in its losses, the Company has not allocated such losses to the unvested RSAs in computing basic earnings per share, using the two-class method, for the three-monthsix-month periods ended January 1, 2011 and JanuaryApril 2, 2010.2011.

13


     The computationcomputations of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share attributable to common shareholders for the three-monththree- and six-month periods ended January 1,April 2, 2011 and January 2,April 3, 2010 isare as follows:

15


                        
 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 
 January 1, January 2,  April 2, April 3, April 2, April 3, 
(In thousands except per share amounts) 2011 2010  2011 2010 2011 2010 
Loss from continuing operations $(7,628) $(1,123)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations $2,619 $1,644 $(5,009) $521 
Less allocation to participating securities     (7)  (8)   
              
Available to Insteel common shareholders $(7,628) $(1,123) $2,612 $1,636 $(5,009) $521 
              
  
Loss from discontinued operations net of income taxes $ $(13) $ $(10) $ $(23)
Less allocation to participating securities        
              
Available to Insteel common shareholders $ $(13) $ $(10) $ $(23)
              
  
Net loss $(7,628) $(1,136)
Net earnings (loss) $2,619 $1,634 $(5,009) $498 
Less allocation to participating securities     (7)  (8)   
              
Available to Insteel common shareholders $(7,628) $(1,136) $2,612 $1,626 $(5,009) $498 
              
  
Basic weighted average shares outstanding 17,511 17,410  17,551 17,458 17,531 17,434 
Dilutive effect of stock-based compensation    251 189  209 
              
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding 17,511 17,410  17,802 17,647 17,531 17,643 
              
  
Per share basic:  
Loss from continuing operations $(0.44) $(0.07)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations $0.15 $0.09 $(0.29) $0.03 
Loss from discontinued operations        
              
Net loss $(0.44) $(0.07)
Net earnings (loss) $0.15 $0.09 $(0.29) $0.03 
              
  
Per share diluted:  
Loss from continuing operations $(0.44) $(0.07)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations $0.15 $0.09 $(0.29) $0.03 
Loss from discontinued operations        
              
Net loss $(0.44) $(0.07)
Net earnings (loss) $0.15 $0.09 $(0.29) $0.03 
              
     Options and RSUs representing 697,000444,000 and 365,000628,000 shares for the three-month periods ended January 1,April 2, 2011 and January 2,April 3, 2010, respectively, were antidilutive and were not included in the diluted EPSearnings per share calculation. Options and RSUs representing 570,000 and 496,000 shares for the six-month periods ended April 2, 2011 and April 3, 2010, respectively, were antidilutive and were not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation. Options, RSAs and RSUs representing 189,000 and 229,000220,000 shares for the three-month periodssix-month period ended January 1,April 2, 2011 and January 2, 2010, respectively, were not included in the diluted EPSearnings per share calculation due to the net losses that were incurred.
(10)(12) Share Repurchases
     On November 18, 2008, the Company’s board of directors approved a new share repurchase authorization to buy back up to $25.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions (the “New Authorization”). Repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors. The Company is not obligated to acquire any particular amount of common stock and the program may be commenced or suspended at any time at the Company’s discretion without prior notice. The New Authorization continues in effect until terminated by the Board of Directors. As of January 1,April 2, 2011, there was $24.9$24.8 million remaining available for future share repurchases under this authorization. No purchasesDuring the three- and six-month periods ended April 2, 2011, the Company repurchased $86,000 or 6,757 shares of its common stock were made duringunder the three-month period ended January 1, 2011.repurchase program through restricted stock net-share settlements. During the three-month periodthree- and six-month periods ended January 2,April 3, 2010, the Company repurchased $6,400$45,000 or 5524,673 shares and $51,000 or 5,225 shares, respectively, of its common stock through restricted stock net-share settlements.

1416


(11)(13) Other Financial Data
     Balance sheet information:
                
�� January 1, October 2, 
 April 2, October 2, 
(In thousands) 2011 2010  2011 2010 
Accounts receivable, net:  
Accounts receivable $24,484 $27,266  $38,244 $27,266 
Less allowance for doubtful accounts  (2,128)  (2,296)  (826)  (2,296)
          
Total $22,356 $24,970  $37,418 $24,970 
          
  
Inventories, net:  
Raw materials $35,062 $23,817  $30,951 $23,817 
Work in process 4,347 1,899  4,170 1,899 
Finished goods 21,653 18,203  26,596 18,203 
          
Total $61,062 $43,919  $61,717 $43,919 
          
  
Prepaid expenses and other: 
Other current assets: 
Current deferred tax asset $2,603 $2,612  $2,603 $2,612 
Income taxes receivable 1,336 547  1,369 547 
Capitalized financing costs, net 82 82  82 82 
Other 940 690  876 690 
          
Total $4,961 $3,931  $4,930 $3,931 
          
  
Other assets:  
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies, net of loans $542 and $505 $4,736 $4,525  $4,634 $4,525 
Non-current deferred tax assets 2,199   507  
Capitalized financing costs, net 280 300  259 300 
Other 368 272  370 272 
          
Total $7,583 $5,097  $5,770 $5,097 
          
  
Property, plant and equipment, net:  
Land and land improvements $9,496 $5,571  $9,507 $5,571 
Buildings 42,793 32,433  43,166 32,433 
Machinery and equipment 118,004 97,813  117,606 97,813 
Construction in progress 682 239  4,276 239 
          
 170,975 136,056  174,555 136,056 
Less accumulated depreciation  (79,454)  (77,403)  (81,386)  (77,403)
          
Total $91,521 $58,653  $93,169 $58,653 
          
  
Accrued expenses:  
Salaries, wages and related expenses $2,037 $1,210  $2,113 $1,210 
Pension plan 1,249 1,263  1,266 1,263 
Deferred revenues 1,164 321 
Restructuring 674  
Dividends payable 527  
Customer rebates 524 506 
Worker’s compensation 490 683 
Property taxes 906 846  434 846 
Restructuring 662  
Customer rebates 631 506 
Interest 297  
Legal settlement 600 600   600 
Dividends payable 527  
Worker’s compensation 524 683 
Interest 95  
Deferred revenues  321 
Other 1,085 500  1,066 500 
          
Total $8,316 $5,929  $8,555 $5,929 
          
  
Other liabilities:  
Deferred compensation $5,798 $5,688  $5,915 $5,688 
Deferred income taxes  1,778   1,778 
Other 54 55  55 55 
          
Total $5,852 $7,521  $5,970 $7,521 
          

1517


(12)(14) Business Segment Information
     Following the Company’s exit from the industrial wire business (see Note 46 to the consolidated financial statements), the Company’s operations are entirely focused on the manufacture and marketing of concrete reinforcing products for the concrete construction industry. The Company’s concrete reinforcing products consist of welded wire reinforcement and PC strand. Based on the criteria specified in ASC Topic 280,Segment Reporting, the Company has one reportable segment. The results of operations for the industrial wire products business have been reported as discontinued operations for allthe prior year periods presented.
(13)(15) Contingencies
     Legal proceedings.On November 19, 2007, Dwyidag Systems International, Inc (“DSI”) filed a third-party lawsuit in the Ohio Court of Claims alleging that certain epoxy-coated strand sold by the Company to DSI in 2002, and supplied by DSI to the Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”) for a bridge project, was defective. The third-party action sought recovery of any damages which could have been assessed against DSI in the action filed against it by ODOT, which allegedly could have been in excess of $8.3 million, plus $2.7 million in damages allegedly incurred by DSI. In 2009, the Ohio court granted the Company’s motion for summary judgment as to the third-party claim against it on the grounds that the statute of limitations had expired, but DSI filed an interlocutory appeal of that ruling. In addition, the Company previously filed a lawsuit against DSI in the North Carolina Superior Court in Surry County seeking recovery of $1.4 million (plus interest) owed for other products sold by the Company to DSI, which action was removed by DSI to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.
     On October 7, 2010, the Company participated in a structured mediation with ODOT and DSI which led to settlement of all of the above legal matters. The parties dismissed the action in the Middle District of North Carolina on December 23, 2010, and the Ohio Court of Claims action was dismissed on January 21, 2011. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, which was approved by the Ohio Court of Claims on January 5, 2011, the parties have released each other from all liability arising out of the sale of strand for the bridge project. In connection with the settlement, the Company reserved the remaining outstanding balance that it was owed by DSI and agreed to make a cash payment of $600,000 to ODOT. TheDuring the current quarter, the Company believespaid $600,000 to ODOT and wrote off the DSI receivables against the previously established reserve. The resolution of this matter will enable ithas enabled the Company to reinstate theits commercial relationship with DSI that had existed prior to the initiation of the legal proceedings. The Company’s fourth quarter fiscal 2010 results reflect a pre-tax charge of $1.5 million relating to the net effect of the settlement.
     The Company is also involved in other lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including commercial, environmental and employment matters, which arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company does not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
(14) Business Combination
     On November 19, 2010, the Company purchased certain of the assets and assumed certain of the liabilities of Ivy for a preliminary purchase price of approximately $51.1 million, consisting of $37.6 million of cash and a $13.5 million secured subordinated promissory note payable to Ivy (see Note 8 to the consolidated financial statements). Subsequent to the date of the Ivy Acquisition, the Company recorded a post-closing working capital adjustment of $280,000, which reduced the purchase price to $50.8 million, subject to certain additional post-closing adjustments.
     Ivy was one of the nation’s largest producers of welded wire reinforcement and wire products for concrete construction applications. The Company believes the addition of Ivy’s facilities will enhance the Company’s competitiveness in its Northeast, Midwest and Florida markets, in addition to providing a platform to serve the West Coast markets more effectively. The assets purchased included Ivy’s production facilities in Arizona, Florida, Missouri and Pennsylvania; production equipment in Texas; and certain related inventories. In addition, the Company assumed certain of Ivy’s accounts payable and employee benefit obligations. The purchase price and the fair values assigned to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are subject to adjustment. The Company expects to finalize the valuations and complete the purchase price allocation as soon as practicable, but no later than one year from the acquisition date.

16


     Following is a summary of the Company’s preliminary allocation of the adjusted purchase price to the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the date of the Ivy Acquisition:
     
(In thousands)    
Assets acquired:    
Inventories $20,585 
Property, plant and equipment  37,211 
    
Total assets acquired $57,796 
    
     
Liabilities assumed:    
Accounts payable $6,263 
Accrued expenses  725 
    
Total liabilities assumed $6,988 
    
Net assets acquired $50,808 
    
     The acquisition was accounted for as a business purchase pursuant to ASC Topic 805,Business Combinations. Acquisition and integration costs are not included as components of consideration transferred, but are accounted for as expenses in the period in which the costs are incurred (See Note 15 to the consolidated financial statements).
     For the three-month period ended January 1, 2011, net sales for the Ivy facilities were approximately $4.5 million following the acquisition. The actual amount of net sales specifically attributable to the Ivy Acquisition, however, cannot be quantified due to the integration activities that commenced following the Ivy Acquisition involving the transfer of business between the former Ivy facilities and the Company’s existing facilities. The Company has determined that the presentation of Ivy’s earnings for the three-month period ended January 1, 2011 is impractical due to the integration of Ivy’s operations into the Company following the acquisition.
     The following unaudited supplemental pro forma financial information reflects the combined results of operations of the Company had the Ivy Acquisition occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2010. The pro forma information reflects certain adjustments related to the Ivy Acquisition, including adjusted depreciation expense based on the fair value of the assets acquired, interest expense related to the secured subordinated promissory note payable and an appropriate adjustment in the current period for the acquisition-related costs. The pro forma information does not reflect any operating efficiencies or potential cost savings which may result from the Ivy Acquisition. Accordingly, this pro forma information is for illustrative purposes and is not intended to represent or be indicative of the actual results of operations of the combined company that may have been achieved had the Ivy Acquisition occurred at the beginning of fiscal 2010, nor is it intended to represent or be indicative of future results of operations. The pro forma combined results of operations for the current and comparative prior year period are as follows:
         
  Three Months Ended 
  January 1,  January 2, 
(In thousands) 2011  2010 
Net sales $69,017  $60,355 
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes  11,071   10,604 
Net loss  7,211   6,480 
(15) Restructuring Charges and Acquisition Costs
Restructuring charges.Subsequent to the Ivy Acquisition, the Company’s management elected to proceed with the consolidation of certain of its welded wire operations, including the closure of facilities in Wilmington, Delaware and Houston, Texas, to reduce its operating costs. These actions were in response to the close proximity of Ivy’s facilities to the Company’s existing facilities in Hazleton, Pennsylvania and Dayton, Texas. The Houston plant closure was completed in December 2010 and the Wilmington plant closure is expected to be completed before the end of March 2011.
     During the three-month period ended January 1, 2011, the Company recorded $4.4 million of restructuring charges including $2.9 million for impairment charges related to the plant closures and the decommissioning of equipment, $1.0 million for employee separation costs associated with the plant closures and other staffing reductions, and $500,000 for the future lease obligations for the closed Houston facility. Substantially all of the cash payments related to these charges are expected to be made before the end of the current fiscal year.
     As of January 1, 2011, the Company recorded a liability of $1.1 million on the consolidated balance sheet for restructuring liabilities, including $465,000 in accounts payable and $662,000 in accrued expenses.

17


     Following is a summary of the restructuring activities and associated costs that were incurred during the three-month period ended January 1, 2011:
                     
  Severance             
  and other  Asset  Lease  Other    
(In thousands) employee costs  impairment  termination  costs  Total 
Restructuring charges $979  $2,868  $533  $10  $4,390 
Cash payments  (310)      (75)  (10)  (395)
Non-cash charges     (2,868)        (2,868)
                
Liability as of January 1, 2011 $669  $  $458  $  $1,127 
                
     The Company currently expects to incur approximately $2.0 million of additional restructuring charges for equipment relocation and employee separation costs over the remainder of the current fiscal year and that all cash payments related to the restructuring charges will be made before the end of the current fiscal year.
Acquisition costs.During the three-month period ended January 1, 2011, the Company recorded $2.8 million of acquisition-related costs associated with the Ivy Acquisition for advisory, accounting, legal and other professional fees. The Company currently expects to incur approximately $400,000 of additional costs related to the Ivy Acquisition over the remainder of the current fiscal year and that all cash payments related to the Ivy Acquisition costs will be made before the end of the current fiscal year.
Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
     This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, particularly under the caption “Outlook” below. When used in this report, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “estimates,” “intends,” “may,” “should” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, and we can provide no assurances that such plans, intentions or expectations will be implemented or achieved. All forward-looking statements are based on information that is current as of the date of this report. Many of these risks and uncertainties are discussed in detail, and where appropriate, updated in our periodic and other reports and statements, in particular under the caption “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 2010, filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. You should carefully review these risks and uncertainties.
     All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. All forward-looking statements speak only to the respective dates on which such statements are made and we do not undertake and specifically decline any obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect any future events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except as may be required by law.

18


     ��It is not possible to anticipate and list all risks and uncertainties that may affect our future operations or financial performance; however, they would include, but are not limited to, the following:
  potential difficulties that may be encountered in integrating the Ivy Acquisition into our existing business;
 
  potential difficulties in realizing synergies, including reduced operating costs, with respect to the Ivy Acquisition and the cessation of operations at the Houston, Texas and Wilmington, Delaware facilities;facility;
 
  competitive and customer responses to our expanded business following the Ivy Acquisition;
 
  general economic and competitive conditions in the markets in which we operate;
 
  credit market conditions and the relative availability of financing for us, our customers and the construction industry as a whole;
 
  the continuation of reduced spending for nonresidential construction, particularly commercial construction, and the impact on demand for our products;
 
  the timing of the resolution of a new multi-year federal transportation funding authorization and the magnitude of the infrastructure-related funding provided for that requires the use of our products;

18


  the severity and duration of the downturn in residential construction activity and the impact on those portions of our business that are correlated with the housing sector;
 
  the cyclical nature of the steel and building material industries;
 
  fluctuations in the cost and availability of our primary raw material, hot-rolled steel wire rod, from domestic and foreign suppliers;
 
  competitive pricing pressures and our ability to raise selling prices in order to recover increases in wire rod costs;
 
  changes in United States (“U.S.”) or foreign trade policy affecting imports or exports of steel wire rod or our products;
 
  unanticipated changes in customer demand, order patterns and inventory levels;
 
  the impact of weak demand and reduced capacity utilization levels on our unit manufacturing costs;
 
  our ability to further develop the market for engineered structural mesh (“ESM”) and expand our shipments of ESM;
 
  legal, environmental, economic or regulatory developments that significantly impact our operating costs;
 
  unanticipated plant outages, equipment failures or labor difficulties;
 
  continued escalation in certain of our operating costs; and
 
  the “Risk Factors” discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 2010 and in other filings that we make with the SEC.
Overview
     Insteel Industries, Inc. is one of the nation’s largest manufacturers of steel wire reinforcing products for concrete construction applications. We manufacture and market PC strand and welded wire reinforcement, including ESM, concrete pipe reinforcement and standard welded wire reinforcement. Our products are sold primarily to manufacturers of concrete products that are used in nonresidential construction. We market our products through sales representatives who are our employees and through a sales agent.employees. Our products are sold nationwide as well as into Canada, Mexico, and Central and South America, and delivered primarily by truck, using common or contract carriers. Our business strategy is focused on: (1) achieving leadership positions in our markets; (2) operating as the lowest cost producer; and (3) pursuing growth opportunities within our core businesses that further our penetration of current markets served or expand our geographic reach.
     On November 19, 2010, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary, Insteel Wire Products Company, purchased certain of the assets of Ivy for approximately $50.8$50.3 million, after giving effect to the post-closing working capital adjustment and subject to certain additional post-closing adjustments. Ivy was one of the nation’s largest producers of welded wire reinforcement and wire products for concrete construction applications (see Note 143 to the consolidated financial statements). Among other assets, we acquired certain of Ivy’s inventories and its production facilities located in Hazleton, Pennsylvania; Jacksonville, Florida; Kingman, Arizona; and St. Joseph, Missouri, in addition to the production equipment located at the Houston, Texas facility. We also entered into a short-term sublease with Ivy for the Houston, Texas facility. Subsequent to the acquisition, we elected to proceed with the consolidation of certain of our welded

19


wire reinforcement operations to reduce operating costs, including the closure of facilities in Wilmington, Delaware and Houston, Texas. These actions were in response to the close proximity of Ivy’s facilities in Hazleton, Pennsylvania and Houston, Texas to our existing facilities in Wilmington, Delaware and Dayton, Texas.
     Following our exit from the industrial wire business (see Note 46 to the consolidated financial statements), our operations are entirely focused on the manufacture and marketing of concrete reinforcing products. The results of operations for the industrial wire products business have been reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

19


Results of Operations
Statements of Operations – Selected Data
(Dollars in thousands)
                                    
 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended Six Months Ended 
 January 1, January 2,  April 2, April 3, April 2, April 3, 
 2011 Change 2010  2011 Change 2010 2011 Change 2010 
Net sales $52,306  27.0% $41,201  $86,933  66.3% $52,268 $139,239  49.0% $93,469 
Gross profit (loss)  (135) N/M 1,742 
Gross profit 11,603  86.6% 6,219 11,468  44.1% 7,961 
Percentage of net sales
  (0.3%)  4.2%  13.3%  11.9%  8.2%  8.5%
Selling, general and administrative expense $4,168  11.4% $3,742  $4,523  8.2% $4,182 $8,691  9.7% $7,924 
Percentage of net sales
  8.0%  9.1%  5.2%  8.0%  6.2%  8.5%
Restructuring charges $2,213 N/M $ $6,603 N/M $ 
Acquisition costs $2,750 N/M $  768 N/M  3,518 N/M  
Restructuring charges 4,390 N/M  
Bargain purchase gain  (500) N/M   (500) N/M  
Interest expense 151  2.0% 148  253  72.1% 147 404  36.9% 295 
Interest income  (13) N/M  (12)  (6)  (57.1%)  (14)  (19)  (26.9%)  (26)
Effective income tax rate  34.1%  43.4%  40.6%  17.8%  30.0% N/M 
Loss from continuing operations $(7,628) N/M $(1,123)
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations $2,619  59.3% $1,644 $(5,009) N/M $521 
Loss from discontinued operations  N/M  (13)  N/M  (10)  N/M  (23)
Net loss  (7,628) N/M  (1,136)
Net earnings (loss) 2,619  60.3% 1,634  (5,009) N/M 498 
 
“N/M” = not meaningful
FirstSecond Quarter of Fiscal 2011 Compared to FirstSecond Quarter of Fiscal 2010
Net Sales
     Net sales for the firstsecond quarter of 2011 increased 27.0%66.3% to $52.3$86.9 million from $41.2$52.3 million in the same year-ago period. Shipments for the quarter increased 15.9%42.6% and average selling prices increased 9.5%16.7% from the prior year levels. The year-over-year increase in shipments resulted fromwas primarily due to the addition of the Ivy facilities together with higher sales at our existing facilities.in the current fiscal year. The increase in sales foraverage selling prices was driven by price increases that were implemented during the current period is relativeyear quarter to recover higher raw material costs. Sales for both periods reflect severely depressed volumes indue to the prior year quarter resulting from thecontinuation of recessionary conditions in the economy and reduced level of construction activity.industry.
Gross Profit (Loss)
     The gross lossGross profit for the firstsecond quarter of 2011 was $135,000,$11.6 million, or (0.3%)13.3% of net sales, compared with gross profit of $1.7$6.2 million, or 4.2%11.9% of net sales, in the same year-ago period. The gross profit in the prior year quarter included a pre-tax charge of $1.9 million for inventory write-downs to reduce the carrying value of inventory to the lower of cost or market. The gross loss incurred during the current year periodyear-over-year improvement was primarily due to reducedhigher spreads between average selling prices and raw material costs drivenand the addition of the Ivy facilities in the current fiscal year. Gross profit for both periods was unfavorably impacted by the weak market conditions and competitive pricing pressures,depressed shipment volumes and elevated unit conversion costs resulting from the seasonal slowdown and extended downtime at our facilities. Gross margins were also unfavorably impacted by the sale of the higher cost inventory acquired from Ivy that was valued at fair value in accordance with purchase accounting requirements.reduced operating schedules.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
     Selling, general and administrative expense (“SG&A expense”) for the firstsecond quarter of 2011 increased 11.4%8.2% to $4.5 million, or 5.2% of net sales from $4.2 million, or 8.0% of net sales from $3.7 million, or 9.1% of net sales in the same year-ago period primarily due to increases in staffing costs ($239,000)355,000) and other transition-related costs ($71,000)80,000) largely related to the Ivy Acquisition together withand higher stock-based compensation

20


travel expense ($52,000)115,000). These increases were partially offset by a net gain on the settlement of life insurance policies ($357,000) and a reduction in legal expenses ($130,000)100,000) primarily due to the prior year costs associated with the PC strand trade cases.
Acquisition Costs
     Acquisition costs of $2.8 million were incurred during the first quarter of 2011 for advisory, accounting, legal and other professional fees directly related to the Ivy Acquisition. The accounting requirements for business combinations require

20


that acquisition costs be expensed in the period in which they are incurred. We currently expect to incur approximately $400,000 of additional costs related to the Ivy Acquisition over the remainder of the fiscal year.
Restructuring Charges
     Restructuring charges of $4.4$2.2 million were recorded during the firstsecond quarter of 2011 including $2.9 million for impairment charges related to plant closures and the decommissioning of equipment, $1.0$1.2 million for employee separation costs associated with plant closures and other staffing reductions, $583,000 for impairment charges related to plant closures and $500,000the decommissioning of equipment, $229,000 for the future lease obligationsequipment relocation costs and $224,000 for the closed Houston facility.facility closure costs. The plant closure costs were associated with the planned consolidation of our Texas and Northeast operations, which involves the closure of facilities in Houston, Texas and Wilmington, Delaware, and relocation of the manufacturing to plants in Dayton, Texas and Hazelton,Hazleton, Pennsylvania, respectively. The employee separation costs were related to the plant closures and staffing reductions that were implemented across our sales, administration and manufacturing support functions to address the redundancies resulting from the Ivy Acquisition.Acquisition and in connection with the plant closures. We currently expect to incur approximately $2.0$1.0 million of additional restructuring charges for equipment relocation and employee separation costs over the remainder of the fiscal year.
Acquisition Costs
     Acquisition costs of $768,000 were incurred during the second quarter of 2011 for advisory, accounting, legal and other professional fees directly related to the Ivy Acquisition. The accounting requirements for business combinations require that acquisition costs be expensed in the period in which they are incurred. We do not expect to incur any additional acquisition costs related to the Ivy Acquisition over the remainder of the fiscal year.
Bargain Purchase Gain
     A bargain purchase gain of $500,000 was recorded during the second quarter of 2011 based on the excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired in the Ivy Acquisition over the purchase price.
Interest Expense
     Interest expense for the firstsecond quarter of 2011 remained relatively unchanged comparedincreased $106,000 or 72.1% to $253,000 from $147,000 in the same year-ago period asprimarily due to the additional interest expense related to the new secured subordinated promissory note associated with the Ivy Acquisition, which was partially offset by lower amortization of capitalized financing costs.
Income Taxes
     The effective income tax rate for the firstsecond quarter of 2011 decreasedincreased to 34.1%40.6% from 43.4%17.8% in the same year-ago period as a result of changes in permanent book versus tax differences. Our effective income tax rate for the prior year period was reduced by a $500,000 increase in a tax refund as the result of changes in the federal tax regulations regarding the carryback of net operating losses together with changes in permanent book versus tax differences largely related to lower non-deductible life insurance expense.
Earnings From Continuing Operations
     Earnings from continuing operations for the second quarter of 2011 was $2.6 million, or $0.15 per share compared to $1.6 million, or $0.09 per share in the same year-ago period primarily due to the increase in gross profit, which was partially offset by the restructuring charges and acquisition costs incurred in connection with the Ivy Acquisition.
Loss From Discontinued Operations
     The $10,000 loss from discontinued operations in the prior year period, which did not have an effect on the net loss per share, resulted from facility-related costs associated with the real estate held for sale of the discontinued industrial wire business that was sold during the fourth quarter of 2010.
Net Earnings
     The net earnings for the second quarter of 2011 were $2.6 million, or $0.15 per share, compared to $1.6 million, or $0.09 per share, in the same year-ago period primarily due to the increase in gross profit partially offset by the restructuring charges and acquisition costs incurred in connection with the Ivy Acquisition.

21


First Half of Fiscal 2011 Compared to First Half of Fiscal 2010
Net Sales
     Net sales for the first half of 2011 increased 49.0% to $139.2 million from $93.5 million in the same year-ago period. Shipments for the period increased 30.8% while average selling prices for the period increased 13.9% from the prior year levels. The increase in shipments was primarily due to the addition of the Ivy facilities in the current fiscal year. The increase in average selling prices was driven by price increases that were implemented during the current period to recover higher raw material costs. Sales for both periods reflect severely depressed volumes due to the continuation of recessionary conditions in the construction industry.
Gross Profit
     Gross profit for the first half of 2011 was $11.5 million, or 8.2% of net sales, compared to $8.0 million, or 8.5% of net sales, in the same year-ago period. Gross profit for the current year period was unfavorably impacted by the sale of the higher cost inventory acquired from Ivy that was valued at fair value in accordance with purchase accounting requirements. Gross profit for the prior year period includes a pre-tax charge of $1.9 million for inventory write-downs to reduce the carrying value of inventory to the lower of cost or market. Gross profit for both periods was unfavorably impacted by depressed shipment volumes and elevated unit conversion costs resulting from reduced operating schedules.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
     SG&A expense for the first half of 2011 increased 9.7% to $8.7 million, or 6.2% of net sales from $7.9 million, or 8.5% of net sales in the same year-ago period. The increase was primarily due to increases in staffing ($593,000) and other transition-related costs ($153,000) largely related to the Ivy Acquisition together with higher travel expense ($139,000), payroll taxes ($127,000) and stock-based compensation ($101,000). These increases were partially offset by a net gain on the settlement of life insurance policies ($357,000) and a reduction in legal expenses ($234,000) primarily due to the prior year costs associated with the PC strand trade cases.
Restructuring Charges
     Restructuring charges of $6.6 million were recorded during the first half of 2011, including $3.4 million for impairment charges related to plant closures and the decommissioning of equipment, $2.2 million for employee separation costs associated with plant closures and other staffing reductions, $533,000 for the future lease obligations associated with the closed Houston facility, $239,000 for equipment relocation costs and $224,000 for facility closure costs. The plant closure costs were associated with the consolidation of our Texas and Northeast operations, which involves the closure of facilities in Houston, Texas and Wilmington, Delaware, and relocation of the manufacturing to plants in Dayton, Texas and Hazleton, Pennsylvania, respectively. The employee separation costs were related to the staffing reductions that were implemented across our sales, administration and manufacturing support functions to address the redundancies resulting from the Ivy Acquisition and in connection with the plant closures. We currently expect to incur approximately $1.0 million of additional restructuring charges for equipment relocation and employee separation costs over the remainder of the fiscal year.
Acquisition Costs
     Acquisition costs of $3.5 million were incurred during the first half of 2011 for advisory, accounting, legal and other professional fees directly related to the Ivy Acquisition. The accounting requirements for business combinations require that acquisition costs be expensed in the period in which they are incurred. We do not expect to incur any additional acquisition costs related to the Ivy Acquisition over the remainder of the fiscal year.
Bargain Purchase Gain
     A bargain purchase gain of $500,000 was recorded during the first half of 2011 based on the excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired in the Ivy Acquisition over the purchase price.
Interest Expense
     Interest expense for the first half of 2011 increased $109,000 or 36.9% to $404,000 from $295,000 in the same year-ago period. The increase was primarily due to the interest related to the new secured subordinated promissory note associated with the Ivy Acquisition, which was partially offset by lower amortization of capitalized financing costs.

22


Income Taxes
     Our effective income tax rate for the first half of 2011 was 30.0% and reflects the establishment of a valuation allowance against certain state net operating losses and state tax credits that we do not expect to realize andtogether with changes in permanent book versus tax differences. Our effective income tax rate for the prior year period was reduced by a $500,000 increase in a tax refund as the result of changes in the federal tax regulations regarding the carryback of net operating losses together with changes in permanent book versus tax differences primarilylargely related to stock-based compensation.lower non-deductible life insurance expense.
LossEarnings (Loss) From Continuing Operations
     The loss from continuing operations for the first quarterhalf of 2011 was $7.6$5.0 million, or $0.44$0.29 per share compared to $1.1 million,with earnings of $521,000, or $0.07$0.03 per share in the same year-ago period primarily due to the reduction in gross profit together with therestructuring charges and acquisition costs and restructuring charges associatedincurred in connection with the Ivy Acquisition.Acquisition, which were partially offset by the increase in gross profit.
Loss From Discontinued Operations
     There were no earnings orThe $23,000 loss from discontinued operations for the first quarter of 2011 compared with a $13,000 loss in the same year-agoprior year period, which had nodid not have an effect on the net loss per share, for either period. The prior year loss resulted from facility-related costs associated with the real estate held for sale of the discontinued industrial wire business whichthat was sold during the fourth quarter of 2010.
Net LossEarnings (Loss)
     The net loss for the first quarterhalf of 2011 was $7.6$5.0 million, or $0.44$0.29 per share compared to $1.1 million,with earnings of $498,000, or $0.07$0.03 per share in the same year-ago period primarily due to the reduction in gross profit together with therestructuring charges and acquisition costs and restructuring charges associatedincurred in connection with the Ivy Acquisition.Acquisition, which were partially offset by the increase in gross profit.

21


Liquidity and Capital Resources
Selected Financial Data
(Dollars in thousands)
Cash Flow Analysis
                
 Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
 January 1, January 2,  April 2, April 3, 
 2011 2010  2011 2010 
Net cash used for operating activities of continuing operations $(5,091) $(9,771)
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations $42 $19,480 
Net cash used for investing activities  (38,094)  (438)  (41,554)  (1,312)
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities 37  (530)
Net cash used for financing activities  (530)  (967)
  
Net cash used for operating activities of discontinued operations   (29)   (40)
  
Working capital 59,833 82,101  62,858 84,614 
Long-term debt 12,825   12,825  
Percentage of total capital
  8.4%    8.2%  
Shareholders’ equity $140,260 $145,894  $143,002 $147,647 
Percentage of total capital
  91.6%  100.0%  91.8%  100.0%
Total capital (total long-term debt + shareholders’ equity) $153,085 $145,894  $155,827 $147,647 
     Operating activities of continuing operations used $5.1 millionprovided $42,000 of cash during the first quarterhalf of 2011 compared to $9.8$19.5 million during the same period last yearyear. The year-over-year change was primarily due to the year-over-yearprior year receipt of a $13.3 million income tax refund associated with the carryback of net operating losses, the current year loss of $5.0 million and the change in deferred taxes. The current year loss includes a pre-tax charge of $3.5 million for asset impairment charges related to restructuring activities and the prior year earnings include a pre-tax charge of $1.9 million for inventory write-downs. The net working capital components of accounts receivable, inventories, and accounts payable and accrued expenses which provided $2.0 millionused $301,000 in the current year while using $12.9compared to $1.5 million in the same period lastprior year. The cash providedused by net working capital in the current year quarter was largely due to a decreasethe $12.5 million increase in accounts receivable resulting fromas a result of the usual seasonal declineincreases in shipments and selling prices, which was partially offset by a reduction$2.8 million decrease in inventories due to lowerinventory and an $9.4 million increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses resulting from higher raw material purchases. The cash used by net working capital in the prior year quarter was largely due to a $14.5the $4.1 million decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses resulting fromprimarily related to reduced raw

23


material purchases which was partially offset by a $3.5and the $4.4 million decrease in accounts receivable due to the seasonal decline in shipments. The year-over-year improvement in the net working capital components was partially offset by the increase in our current period loss and the change in deferred taxes. Shouldinventories (excluding the impact and duration of the current recessionary conditions in the construction sector persist, we$1.9 million of inventory write-downs) resulting from higher shipments. We may elect to make additional adjustments in our operating activities should the current recessionary conditions in our construction end market persist, which could materially impact our cash requirements. While a downturn in the level of construction activity adversely affects sales to our customers, it generally reduces our working capital requirements.
     Investing activities used $38.1$41.6 million of cash during the first quarterhalf of 2011 compared to $438,000$1.3 million during the same period last year. The increase in cash used was primarily related to the Ivy Acquisition.Acquisition and an increase in capital expenditures to $4.9 million in the current year compared to $0.9 million in the prior year. Capital expenditures are expected to total less than $10.0 million for fiscal 2011. Our investing activities are largely discretionary, which gives us the ability to significantly curtail future outlays should future business conditions warrant that such actions be taken.
     Financing activities provided $37,000used $530,000 of cash during the first quarterhalf of 2011 while using $530,000compared to $967,000 during the same period last year. The year-over-year change was primarily due to the inclusion of two quarterly cash dividend that was paid duringpayments in the prior year quarter.compared with one in the current year.
Credit Facilities
     On June 2, 2010, we and each of our wholly-owned subsidiaries entered into the Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) which amends and restates in its entirety the previous agreement pertaining to our revolving credit facility that had been in effect since January 2006. The Credit Agreement, which matures on June 2, 2015, provides us with up to $75.0 million of financing on the credit facility to supplement our operating cash flow and fund our working capital, capital expenditure, general corporate and growth requirements. As of January 1,April 2, 2011, no borrowings were outstanding on the credit facility, $57.7$70.7 million of additional borrowing capacity was available and outstanding letters of credit totaled $919,000.$1.1 million.
     As part of the consideration for purchasing certain assets of Ivy on November 19, 2010 (See Note 143 to the consolidated financial statements), the Company entered into a $13.5 million secured subordinated promissory note (the “Note”) payable to Ivy over five years. The Note requires semi-annual interest payments in arrears, and annual principal payments payable on November 19th of each year during the period 2011 - 2015. The Note bears interest on the unpaid principal balance at a fixed rate of 6.00% per annum and is collateralized by certain of the real property and equipment

22


acquired from Ivy. Based on the terms of the Note, the Company expects to make cash payments of approximately $405,000 for interest and no principal payments during fiscal 2011.
     We believe that, in the absence of significant unanticipated cash demands, cash and cash equivalents, and net cash generated by operating activities will be sufficient to satisfy our expected requirements for working capital, capital expenditures, dividends, principal and interest payments on the Note and share repurchases, if any. We also expect to have access to the amounts available under our revolving credit facility as required. However, further deterioration in general economicof market conditions and in the construction sector could result in additional reductions in demand from our customers, which would likely reduce our operating cash flows. Our operating cash flows could also be unfavorably impacted by unanticipated cash requirements arising in connection with the Ivy Acquisition. Under such circumstances, we may need to curtail capital and operating expenditures, delay or restrict share repurchases, cease dividend payments and/or realign our working capital requirements.
     Should we determine, at any time, that we require additional short-term liquidity, we would evaluate the alternative sources of financing that are potentially available to provide such funding. There can be no assurance that any such financing, if pursued, would be obtained, or if obtained, would be adequate or on terms acceptable to us. However, we believe that our strong balance sheet, flexible capital structure and borrowing capacity available to us under our revolving credit facility position us to meet our anticipated liquidity requirements for the foreseeable future.
Seasonality and Cyclicality
     Demand in our markets is both seasonal and cyclical, driven by the level of construction activity, but can also be impacted by fluctuations in the inventory positions of our customers. From a seasonal standpoint, the highest level of sales within the year typically occurs when weather conditions are the most conducive to construction activity. As a result, sales and profitability are usually higher in the third and fourth quarters of the fiscal year and lower in the first and second quarters. From a cyclical standpoint, the level of construction activity tends to be correlated with general economic conditions although there can be significant differences between the relative performance of the nonresidential versus residential construction sectors for extended periods.

24


Impact of Inflation
     We are subject to inflationary risks arising from fluctuations in the market prices for our primary raw material, hot-rolled steel wire rod, and, to a much lesser extent, freight, energy and other consumables that are used in our manufacturing processes. We have generally been able to adjust our selling prices to pass through increases in these costs or offset them through various cost reduction and productivity improvement initiatives. However, our ability to raise our selling prices depends on market conditions and competitive dynamics, and there may be periods during which we are unable to fully recover increases in our costs. During 2010, our ability to fully recover higher wire rod prices was mitigated by competitive pricing pressures resulting from the ongoing weakness in demand. DuringSince December 2010, wire rod prices have risen due to the first quarterescalation in the cost of 2011, inflation did not have a materialscrap and other raw materials for wire rod producers and increased demand from non-construction applications, and could continue to trend higher. The timing and magnitude of any future increases in the prices for wire rod and the impact on selling prices for our sales or earnings.products is uncertain at this time.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
     We do not have any material transactions, arrangements, obligations (including contingent obligations), or other relationships with unconsolidated entities or other persons, as defined by Item 303(a)(4) of Regulation S-K of the SEC, that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future impact on our financial condition, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, capital resources or significant components of revenues or expenses.
Contractual Obligations
     Except forwith respect to the debt maturity schedule described in Note (see Note 810 to our consolidated financial statements herein, for the debt maturity schedule), there have been no material changes in our contractual obligations and commitments as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K as of October 2, 2010 other than those which occur in the ordinary course of business.
Critical Accounting Policies
     Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on these financial statements. The preparation of our financial statements requires the application of accounting policies in addition to certain

23


estimates and judgments based on current available information, actuarial estimates, historical results and other assumptions believed to be reasonable. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
     Following is a discussion of our most critical accounting policies, which are those that are both important to the depiction of our financial condition and results of operations and that require judgments, assumptions and estimates.
     Revenue recognition.We recognize revenue from product sales when products are shipped and risk of loss and title has passed to the customer. Sales taxes collected from customers are recorded on a net basis and are thus excluded from revenue.
     Concentration of credit risk.Financial instruments that subject us to concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and cash equivalents and trade accounts receivable. Our cash is concentrated primarily at one financial institution, which at times exceeds federally insured limits. We are exposed to credit risk in the event of default by institutions in which our cash and cash equivalents are held and by customers to the extent of the amounts recorded on the balance sheet. We invest excess cash primarily in money market funds, which are highly liquid securities that bear minimal risk.
     Most of our accounts receivable are due from customers that are located in the U.S. and we generally require no collateral depending upon the creditworthiness of the account. We provide an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon our assessment of the credit risk of specific customers, historical trends and other information. There is no disproportionate concentration of credit risk.
     Allowance for doubtful accounts.We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the potential inability of our customers to make required payments on outstanding balances owed to us. Significant management judgments and estimates are used in establishing the allowances. These judgments and estimates consider such factors as customers’ financial position, cash flows and payment history as well as current and expected business conditions. It is reasonably likely that actual collections will differ from our estimates, which may result in increases or decreases in the allowances. Adjustments to the allowances may also be required if there are significant changes in the financial condition of our customers.

25


     Inventory valuation.We periodically evaluate the carrying value of our inventory. This evaluation includes assessing the adequacy of allowances to cover losses in the normal course of operations, providing for excess and obsolete inventory, and ensuring that inventory is valued at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value. Our evaluation considers such factors as the cost of inventory, future demand, our historical experience and market conditions. In assessing the realization of inventory values, we are required to make judgments and estimates regarding future market conditions. Because of the subjective nature of these judgments and estimates, it is reasonably likely that actual outcomes will differ from our estimates. Adjustments to these reserves may be required if actual market conditions for our products are substantially different than the assumptions underlying our estimates.
     Self insurance.We are self-insured for certain losses relating to medical and workers’ compensation claims. Self-insurance claims filed and claims incurred but not reported are accrued based upon management’s estimates of the discounted ultimate cost for uninsured claims incurred using actuarial assumptions followed in the insurance industry and historical experience. These estimates are subject to a high degree of variability based upon future inflation rates, litigation trends, changes in benefit levels and claim settlement patterns. Because of uncertainties related to these factors as well as the possibility of changes in the underlying facts and circumstances, future adjustments to these reserves may be required.
     Litigation.From time to time, we may be involved in claims, lawsuits and other proceedings. Such matters involve uncertainty as to the eventual outcomes and the potential losses that we may ultimately incur. We record expenses for litigation when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. We estimate the probability of such losses based on the advice of legal counsel, the outcome of similar litigation, the status of the lawsuits and other factors. Due to the numerous factors that enter into these judgments and assumptions, it is reasonably likely that actual outcomes will differ from our estimates. We monitor our potential exposure to these contingencies on a regular basis and may adjust our estimates as additional information becomes available or as there are significant developments.
     Assumptions for employee benefit plans.We have two defined employee benefit plans: the Insteel Wire Products Company Retirement Income Plan for Hourly Employees, Wilmington, Delaware (the “Delaware Plan”) and the supplemental employee retirement plans (each, a “SERP”). We recognize net periodic pension costs and value pension assets or liabilities based on certain actuarial assumptions, principally the assumed discount rate and the assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets.

24


     The discount rates we utilize for determining net periodic pension costs and the related benefit obligations for our plans are based, in part, on current interest rates earned on long-term bonds that receive one of the two highest ratings assigned by recognized rating agencies. Our discount rate assumptions are adjusted as of each valuation date to reflect current interest rates on such long-term bonds. The discount rates are used to determine the actuarial present value of the benefit obligations as of the valuation date as well as the interest component of the net periodic pension cost for the following year.
     The assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets for the Delaware Plan represents the estimated average rate of return expected to be earned on the funds invested or to be invested in the plan’s assets to fund the benefit payments inherent in the projected benefit obligations. Unlike the discount rate, which is adjusted each year based on changes in current long-term interest rates, the assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets will not necessarily change based upon the actual short-term performance of the plan assets in any given year. The amount of net periodic pension cost that is recorded each year for the plan is based on the assumed long-term rate of return on plan assets and the actual fair value of the plan assets as of the beginning of the year. We regularly review our actual asset allocation and, when appropriate, rebalance the investments in the plan to more accurately reflect the targeted allocation.
     For 2010, the assumed long-term rate of return utilized for plan assets of the Delaware Plan was 8%. We currently expect to use the same assumed rate for the long-term return on plan assets in 2011. In determining the appropriateness of this assumption, we considered the historical rate of return of the plan assets, the current and projected asset mix, our investment objectives and information provided by our third-party investment advisors.
     The projected benefit obligations and net periodic pension cost for the Delaware Plan are based in part on expected increases in future compensation levels. Our assumption for the expected increase in future compensation levels is based upon our average historical experience and management’s intentions regarding future compensation increases, which generally approximates average long-term inflation rates.
     Assumed discount rates and rates of return on plan assets are reevaluated annually. Changes in these assumptions can result in the recognition of materially different pension costs over different periods and materially different asset and liability amounts in our consolidated financial statements. A reduction in the assumed discount rate generally results in an actuarial loss, as the actuarially-determined present value of estimated future benefit payments will increase. Conversely, an

26


increase in the assumed discount rate generally results in an actuarial gain. In addition, an actual return on plan assets for a given year that is greater than the assumed return on plan assets results in an actuarial gain, while an actual return on plan assets that is less than the assumed return results in an actuarial loss. Other actual outcomes that differ from previous assumptions, such as individuals living longer or shorter lives than assumed in the mortality tables that are also used to determine the actuarially-determined present value of estimated future benefit payments, changes in such mortality tables themselves or plan amendments will also result in actuarial losses or gains. Under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, actuarial gains and losses are deferred and amortized into income over future periods based upon the expected average remaining service life of the active plan participants (for plans for which benefits are still being earned by active employees) or the average remaining life expectancy of the inactive participants (for plans for which benefits are not still being earned by active employees). However, any actuarial gains generated in future periods reduce the negative amortization effect of any cumulative unamortized actuarial losses, while any actuarial losses generated in future periods reduce the favorable amortization effect of any cumulative unamortized actuarial gains.
     The amounts recognized as net periodic pension cost and as pension assets or liabilities are based upon the actuarial assumptions discussed above. We believe that all of the actuarial assumptions used for determining the net periodic pension costs and pension assets or liabilities related to the Delaware Plan are reasonable and appropriate. The funding requirements for the Delaware Plan are based upon applicable regulations, and will generally differ from the amount of pension cost recognized for financial reporting purposes. No contributions were required to be made to the Delaware Plan in the prior year.
     In February 2011, as part of the planned closure of the Wilmington, Delaware facility, we amended the Delaware Plan granting certain participants additional service credit. The amendment resulted in a one-time charge of $306,000 that has been included within the restructuring charges for the three- and six-month periods ended April 2, 2011. We currently expect net periodic pension costs for both plans to total $935,000$1.0 million during 2011. Cash contributions to the Delaware Planplans during 2011 are expected to total $168,000 during 2011. Contributions to$478,000 for the SERPs are expected to totalDelaware Plan and $244,000 during 2011,for the SERPs, matching the required benefit payments.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
     In December 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an update that clarified the guidance provided in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805,Business Combinations, regarding the disclosure requirements for the pro forma presentation of revenue and earnings related to a business combination. We elected to early adopt this guidance during the first quarter of fiscal 2011.

25


Outlook
     Our visibility for business conditions through the remainder of fiscal 2011 is clouded by the continued uncertainty regarding future economic conditions and the prospects for a pronounced recovery in the employmenteconomy and in the job market, the availability of financing in the credit markets and the timing and magnitude of the next federal transportation funding authorization. We expect nonresidential construction, our primary demand driver, to remain at depressed levels particularly for commercial projects which have been the most severely impacted by the economic downturn. We believe the favorable impact from the infrastructure-related funding provided for under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act has largely been mitigated by the project mix, which is skewed towards pavement resurfacing and repairs that do not require the use of our products together with reduced spending at the state and local government level. We expect that residential construction will remain weak, but gradually improve over the course of the year, favorably impacting shipments to customers that have greater exposure to the housing sector.
     In spite of the ongoing weakness in market conditions, prices for our primary raw material, hot-rolled steel wire rod, have spiked higher since December 2010 driven by the sharp escalation in scrap costs for steel producers. Although we have announced price increases for our products to recover these additional costs, the net impact on margins is uncertain at this time.
     In response to the challenges facing us, we will continue to focus on the operational fundamentals of our business: closely managing and controlling our expenses; aligning our production schedules with demand in a proactive manner as there are changes in market conditions to minimize our cash operating costs; and pursuing further improvements in the productivity and effectiveness of all of our manufacturing, selling and administrative activities. As we move into the second half of the year, we expect the contributions from the Ivy Acquisition will begin to have a favorable financial impactincrease through the realization of the anticipated operational synergies and the completion of our transition and integration activities. As market conditions improve, we also expect gradually increasing contributions from the substantial investments we have made in our facilities in the form of reduced operating costs and additional capacity to support future growth (see “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking

27


Statements” and “Risk Factors”). In addition, we will continue to evaluate further potential acquisitions in our existing businesses that furtherexpand our penetration in currentof markets servedwe currently serve or expand our geographic footprint.
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
     Our cash flows and earnings are subject to fluctuations resulting from changes in commodity prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. We manage our exposure to these market risks through internally established policies and procedures and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of derivative financial instruments. We do not use financial instruments for trading purposes and we are not a party to any leveraged derivatives. We monitor our underlying market risk exposures on an ongoing basis and believe that we can modify or adapt our hedging strategies as necessary.
Commodity Prices
     We are subject to significant fluctuations in the cost and availability of our primary raw material, hot-rolled steel wire rod, which we purchase from both domestic and foreign suppliers. We negotiate quantities and pricing for both domestic and foreign steel wire rod purchases for varying periods (most recently monthly for domestic suppliers), depending upon market conditions, to manage our exposure to price fluctuations and to ensure adequate availability of material consistent with our requirements. We do not use derivative commodity instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in prices as such instruments are not currently available for steel wire rod. Our ability to acquire steel wire rod from foreign sources on favorable terms is impacted by fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, foreign taxes, duties, tariffs and other trade actions. Although changes in wire rod costs and our selling prices may be correlated over extended periods of time, depending upon market conditions and competitive dynamics, there may be periods during which we are unable to fully recover increased wire rod costs through higher selling prices, which would reduce our gross profit and cash flow from operations. Additionally, should wire rod costs decline, our financial results may be negatively impacted if the selling prices for our products decrease to an even greater degree and to the extent that we are consuming higher cost material from inventory. Based on our shipments and average wire rod cost reflected in cost of sales for the first quartersix months of fiscal 2011, a 10% increase in the price of steel wire rod would have resulted in a $3.7$9.0 million decrease in our pre-tax earnings for the quartersix months ended January 1,April 2, 2011 (assuming there was not a corresponding change in our selling prices).
Interest Rates
     Although the interest rate on our Note is fixed and we did not have any balances outstanding on our revolving credit facility as of January 1,April 2, 2011, future borrowings under the facility would be sensitive to changes in interest rates.

26


Foreign Exchange Exposure
     We have not typically hedged foreign currency exposures related to transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. dollars, as such transactions have not been material historically. We will occasionally hedge firm commitments for certain equipment purchases that are denominated in foreign currencies. The decision to hedge any such transactions is made by us on a case-by-case basis. There were no forward contracts outstanding as of January 1,April 2, 2011.
Item 4.Controls and Procedures
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
     We have conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of January 1,April 2, 2011. This evaluation was conducted under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer. Based upon that evaluation, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Commission’s rules and forms. Further, we concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
     There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended January 1,April 2, 2011 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

28


PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.Legal Proceedings
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
     On November 19, 2007, Dwyidag Systems International, Inc (“DSI”) filed a third-party lawsuit in the Ohio Court of Claims alleging that certain epoxy-coated strand sold by us to DSI in 2002, and supplied by DSI to the Ohio Department of Transportation (“ODOT”) for a bridge project, was defective. The third-party action sought recovery of any damages which could have been assessed against DSI in the action filed against it by ODOT, which allegedly could have been in excess of $8.3 million, plus $2.7 million in damages allegedly incurred by DSI. In 2009, the Ohio court granted our motion for summary judgment as to the third-party claim against it on the grounds that the statute of limitations had expired, but DSI filed an interlocutory appeal of that ruling. In addition, we previously filed a lawsuit against DSI in the North Carolina Superior Court in Surry County seeking recovery of $1.4 million (plus interest) owed for other products sold by us to DSI, which action was removed by DSI to the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina.
     On October 7, 2010, we participated in a structured mediation with ODOT and DSI which led to settlement of all of the above legal matters. The parties dismissed the action in the Middle District of North Carolina on December 23, 2010, and the Ohio Court of Claims action was dismissed on January 21, 2011. Pursuant to the settlement agreement, which was approved by the Ohio Court of Claims on January 5, 2011, the parties have released each other from all liability arising out of the sale of strand for the bridge project. In connection with the settlement, we reserved the remaining outstanding balance that was owed to us by DSI and agreed to make a cash payment of $600,000 to ODOT. We believeDuring the current quarter, we paid $600,000 to ODOT and wrote off the DSI receivables against the previously established reserve. The resolution of this matter will enablehas enabled us to reinstate theour commercial relationship with DSI that had existed prior to the initiation of the legal proceedings. Our fourth quarter fiscal 2010 results reflect a pre-tax charge of $1.5 million relating to the net effect of the settlement.
     We are also involved in other lawsuits, claims, investigations and proceedings, including commercial, environmental and employment matters, which arise in the ordinary course of business. We do not expect that the ultimate costs to resolve these matters will have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Item 1A.Risk Factors
Item 1A. Risk Factors
     There were no material changes during the quarter ended January 1,April 2, 2011 from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A., “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 2, 2010. You should carefully consider these factors in addition to the other information set forth in this report which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks and uncertainties described in this report and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 2, 2010, as well as other reports and statements that we file with the SEC, are not the only risks and uncertainties facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

27


Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
     On November 18, 2008, our Board of Directors approved a new share repurchase authorization to buy back up to $25.0 million of our outstanding common stock in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions (the “New Authorization”). The New Authorization replaces the previous authorization to repurchase up to $25.0 million of our common stock, which was scheduled to expire on December 5, 2008. Repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements and other factors. We are not obligated to acquire any particular amount of common stock and the program may be commenced or suspended at any time at our discretion without prior notice. The New Authorization continues in effect until terminated by the Board of Directors. As of January 1,April 2, 2011, there was $24.9$24.8 million remaining available for future share repurchases under this authorization. We did not repurchase anyDuring the three- and six-month periods ended April 2, 2011, we repurchased $86,000 or 6,757 shares of our common stock under the repurchase program through restricted stock net-share settlements. During the three- and six-month periods ended April 3, 2010, we repurchased $45,000 or otherwise4,673 shares and $51,000 or 5,225 shares, respectively, of our common stock through restricted stock net-share settlements.

29


     The following table summarizes our repurchases of common stock during the three-month periodquarter ended January 1, 2011.April 2, 2011:
                                
          Total Number of    
          Shares Purchased as  Maximum Number (or Approximate 
          Part of Publicly  Dollar Value) of Shares That May Yet 
  Total Number of  Average Price  Announced Plan or  Be Purchased Under the Plan or 
(In thousands except per share amounts) Shares Purchased  Paid per Share  Program  Program 
January 2, 2011 - February 5, 2011          $24,897(1)
February 6, 2011 - March 5, 2011 (2)  6,757  $12.60   6,757   24,812(1)
March 6, 2011 - April 2, 2011           24,812(1)
        ��      
Total  6,757       6,757   24,812(1)
               
Item 6.(1) ExhibitsUnder the $25.0 million share repurchase authorization announced on November 18, 2008, which continues in effect until terminated by the Board of Directors.
(2)Represents 6,757 shares surrendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations upon the vesting of restricted stock awards.
Item 6. Exhibits
   
10.110.4 Asset PurchaseSecond Amended and Restated Credit Agreement betweendated as of June 2, 2010, among Insteel Wire Products Company, as Borrower; Insteel Industries, Inc., as a Credit Party; Intercontinental Metals Corporation, as a Credit Party; and Ivy Steel & Wire, Inc. datedGeneral Electric Capital Corporation, as of November 19, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010).
10.2Subordinated Secured Term Note dated as of November 19, 2010, madeAgent and delivered by Insteel Wire Products Company in favor of Ivy Steel & Wire, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010).
31.1Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

28


SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
Registrant
Date: February 8, 2011 By:  /s/ Michael C. Gazmarian  
Michael C. Gazmarian 
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Financial Officer) 

29


EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
NumberDescription
10.1Asset Purchase Agreement between Insteel Wire Products Company and Ivy Steel & Wire, Inc. dated as of November 19, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010).
10.2Subordinated Secured Term Note dated as of November 19, 2010, made and delivered by Insteel Wire Products Company in favor of Ivy Steel & Wire, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 22, 2010).Lender.
   
31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
   
32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

30


SIGNATURES
     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
INSTEEL INDUSTRIES, INC.
Registrant
Date: April 26, 2011 By:  /s/ Michael C. Gazmarian  
Michael C. Gazmarian 
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
(Duly Authorized Officer and
Principal Financial Officer) 

31


EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
NumberDescription
10.4Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 2, 2010, among Insteel Wire Products Company, as Borrower; Insteel Industries, Inc., as a Credit Party; Intercontinental Metals Corporation, as a Credit Party; and General Electric Capital Corporation, as Agent and Lender.
31.1Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32