UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
---------------
FORM 10-Q
---------------
(MARK ONE)
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2003
OR
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM _________ TO ________.
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-6903
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE 75-0225040
(State of Incorporation) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2525 STEMMONS FREEWAY
DALLAS, TEXAS 75207-2401
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code (214) 631-4420
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS
REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. YES [X] NoNO [ ].
INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS AN ACCELERATED FILER (AS
DEFINED IN RULE 12B-212b-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT). YES [X] NO [ ]
AT APRIL 30,JULY 31, 2003 THERE WERE 45,972,96446,234,558 SHARES OF THE REGISTRANT'S COMMON
STOCK OUTSTANDING.
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CAPTION PAGE
--------------------------------------------------------------------- ----
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1 Financial Statements ...............................................Statements.......................................... 3
Item 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations ................................ 13Operations........................... 15
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk ......... 17Risk.... 21
Item 4 Controls and Procedures ............................................ 18Procedures....................................... 21
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1 Legal Proceedings .................................................. 19Proceedings............................................. 22
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders ................ 19Holders........... 22
Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K ................................... 19
SIGNATURES ........................................................................... 21
CERTIFICATIONS ....................................................................... 228-K.............................. 23
SIGNATURES.......................................................................... 24
CERTIFICATIONS...................................................................... 26
2
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTSTATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30,
2003 2002
------------- --------------------- --------
(UNAUDITED)
(IN MILLIONS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
Revenues .........................................Revenues............................................ $ 289.1365.8 $ 384.3366.0
Operating costs:
Cost of revenues ............................... 261.0 348.0revenues.................................. 315.1 322.1
Selling, engineering and administrative
expenses ..................................... 39.5 40.5
------------- -------------
300.5 388.5
------------- -------------expenses........................................ 40.3 40.7
-------- --------
355.4 362.8
-------- --------
Operating loss ................................... (11.4) (4.2)profit.................................... 10.4 3.2
Other (income) expense:
Interest income ................................ (0.1)income................................... (0.2) (0.3)
Interest expense ............................... 9.5 7.0expense.................................. 8.4 10.3
Other, net ..................................... (0.8) 0.5
------------- -------------
8.6 7.2
------------- -------------
Lossnet........................................ (2.6) 0.9
-------- --------
5.6 10.9
-------- --------
Income (loss) before income taxes ......................... (20.0) (11.4)taxes................... 4.8 (7.7)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes:
Current ........................................ (3.7) (25.0)
Deferred ....................................... (1.8) 22.2
------------- -------------
(5.5) (2.8)
------------- -------------Current........................................... (8.4) (16.3)
Deferred.......................................... 9.7 14.3
-------- --------
1.3 (2.0)
-------- --------
Net loss .........................................income (loss)................................... $ (14.5)3.5 $ (8.6)
============= =============(5.7)
======== ========
Net lossincome (loss) per common share:
Basic ..........................................Basic............................................. $ (0.32)0.08 $ (0.19)
============= =============
Diluted ........................................(0.13)
======== ========
Diluted........................................... $ (0.32)0.08 $ (0.19)
============= =============(0.13)
======== ========
Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic ..........................................Basic............................................. 45.5 44.4
Diluted ........................................ 45.5
44.4Diluted........................................... 45.6 45.5
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSTATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
MARCH 31, DECEMBER 31,SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,
2003 2002
------------ -------------------- --------
(UNAUDITED)
(IN MILLIONS)MILLIONS EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
ASSETS
CashRevenues............................................ $ 654.9 $ 750.3
Operating costs:
Cost of revenues.................................. 576.1 670.1
Selling, engineering and cash equivalents ..................................administrative
expenses........................................ 79.8 81.2
-------- --------
655.9 751.3
-------- --------
Operating loss...................................... (1.0) (1.0)
Other (income) expense:
Interest income................................... (0.3) (0.6)
Interest expense.................................. 17.9 17.3
Other, net........................................ (3.4) 1.4
-------- --------
14.2 18.1
-------- --------
Loss before income taxes............................ (15.2) (19.1)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes:
Current........................................... (12.1) (41.3)
Deferred.......................................... 7.9 36.5
-------- --------
(4.2) (4.8)
-------- --------
Net loss............................................ $ 45.3(11.0) $ 19.1
Receivables, net(14.3)
======== ========
Net loss per common share:
Basic............................................. $ (0.24) $ (0.32)
======== ========
Diluted........................................... $ (0.24) $ (0.32)
======== ========
Weighted average number of allowance .............................. 152.8 168.2
Income tax receivable ...................................... 3.8 50.0
Inventories:
Raw materials and supplies ............................. 113.3 115.9
Work in process ........................................ 42.5 42.3
Finished goods ......................................... 51.8 55.1
------------ ------------
207.6 213.3
Property, plant and equipment, at cost ..................... 1,616.1 1,551.8
Less accumulated depreciation .............................. (624.0) (604.4)
------------ ------------
992.1 947.4
Goodwill ................................................... 413.2 411.3
Other assets ............................................... 122.5 133.6
------------ ------------
$ 1,937.3 $ 1,942.9
============ ============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities ................... 399.7 396.0
Debt ....................................................... 496.2 488.9
Other liabilities .......................................... 55.4 56.4
------------ ------------
951.3 941.3
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred Stock - 1.5 shares authorized and unissued ..... -- --
Common stock -- shares issued and outstanding at
March 31, 2003-- 50.9; at December 31, 2002 -- 50.9 .... 50.9 50.9
Capital in excess of par value ........................... 441.2 442.1
Retained earnings ........................................ 655.3 672.6
Accumulated other comprehensive loss ..................... (34.0) (34.9)
Treasury stock (5.0 shares at March 31, 2003 and 5.0
shares at December 31, 2002) .......................... (127.4) (129.1)
------------ ------------
986.0 1,001.6
------------ ------------
$ 1,937.3 $ 1,942.9
============ ============outstanding:
Basic............................................. 45.5 44.5
Diluted........................................... 45.5 44.5
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTBALANCE SHEETS
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
2003 2002
---------- -----------
(UNAUDITED)
(IN MILLIONS)
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents............................... $ 71.9 $ 19.1
Receivables, net of allowance........................... 208.7 168.2
Income tax receivable................................... 4.6 50.0
Inventories:
Raw materials and supplies.......................... 125.8 115.9
Work in process..................................... 44.8 42.3
Finished goods...................................... 48.5 55.1
----------- ----------
219.1 213.3
Property, plant and equipment, at cost.................. 1,693.8 1,551.8
Less accumulated depreciation........................... (679.2) (604.4)
----------- ----------
1,014.6 947.4
Goodwill................................................ 413.2 411.3
Other assets............................................ 119.9 133.6
----------- ----------
$ 2,052.0 $ 1,942.9
=========== ==========
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities................ $ 419.5 $ 396.0
Debt.................................................... 491.9 488.9
Other liabilities....................................... 90.1 56.4
----------- ----------
1,001.5 941.3
Series B redeemable convertible preferred
stock, no par value, $0.1 liquidation value............ 57.6 --
Stockholders' equity:
Preferred stock - 1.5 shares authorized and
unissued............................................. -- --
Common stock -- shares issued and outstanding at
June 30, 2003-50.9; at December 31, 2002 -- 50.9.... 50.9 50.9
Capital in excess of par value........................ 437.4 442.1
Retained earnings..................................... 656.0 672.6
Accumulated other comprehensive loss.................. (32.6) (34.9)
Treasury stock (4.7 shares at June 30, 2003 and 5.0
shares at December 31, 2002)....................... (118.8) (129.1)
----------- ----------
992.9 1,001.6
----------- ----------
$ 2,052.0 $ 1,942.9
=========== ==========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS CASH FLOWS
THREESIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,
----------------------------JUNE 30,
2003 2002
------------ -------------------- ---------
(UNAUDITED)
(IN MILLIONS)
Operating activities:
Net loss .......................................................................loss...................................................................... $ (14.5)(11.0) $ (8.6)(14.3)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided
(required) by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization .............................................. 21.8 22.0amortization............................................. 42.8 42.0
Deferred income taxes ..................................................... (1.8) 22.2taxes..................................................... 7.9 36.5
Gain on sale of property, plant, equipment and
other assets ........................................................... (1.4) (0.2)
Other ..................................................................... (0.6) (0.3)assets.......................................................... (4.4) (0.4)
Other..................................................................... 1.7 1.4
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of effects
from acquisitions and unusual charges:
Decreaseliabilities:
(Increase) decrease in receivables ............................................ 15.4 14.7receivables................................ (40.5) 22.8
Decrease (increase) in tax receivables ............................. 46.2 (13.0)
Decreasereceivable............................. 45.4 (32.1)
(Increase) decrease in inventories ............................................ 5.7 13.3inventories................................ (5.8) 30.5
Decrease in other assets ........................................... 10.9 7.0assets.......................................... 13.0 14.7
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities .... 4.8 (37.3)liabilities... 23.5 (39.5)
Increase (decrease) in other liabilities ........................... 1.1 (3.1)
------------ ------------liabilities.......................... 14.6 (8.1)
-------- ---------
Total adjustments ................................................. 102.1 25.3
------------ ------------adjustments................................................ 98.2 67.8
-------- ---------
Net cash provided by operating activities ........................................ 87.6 16.7activities..................................... 87.2 53.5
-------- ---------
Investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, equipment and other assets .............. 2.5 1.5assets............. 31.9 2.2
Capital expenditures - lease subsidiary ........................................ (65.5) (20.4)subsidiary....................................... (112.6) (54.2)
Capital expenditures - other ................................................... (2.9) (9.0)
------------ ------------other.................................................. (8.6) (12.1)
-------- ---------
Net cash required by investing activities ...................................... (65.9) (27.9)activities..................................... (89.3) (64.1)
-------- ---------
Financing activities:
Issuance of common stock .......................................................stock...................................................... -- 31.331.2
Issuance of redeemable preferred stock........................................ 57.6 --
Payments to retire debt ........................................................ (67.5) (188.7)debt....................................................... (105.2) (380.4)
Proceeds from issuance of debt ................................................. 74.8 170.0debt................................................ 108.2 359.0
Dividends paid ................................................................. (2.8) (8.0)
------------ ------------paid................................................................ (5.7) (10.8)
-------- ---------
Net cash provided by financing activities ...................................... 4.5 4.6
------------ ------------activities..................................... 54.9 (1.0)
-------- ---------
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents ............................. 26.2 (6.6)equivalents............................ 52.8 (11.6)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period .................................period................................ 19.1 22.2
------------ -------------------- ---------
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period .......................................period...................................... $ 45.371.9 $ 15.6
============ ============10.6
======== =========
Interest paid for the quarterssix months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 and 2002 was $11.5$15.9 and
$4.9,$10.8, respectively. Taxes received, net of payments made, for the quarterssix months
ended March 31,June 30, 2003 and 2002 were $47.3$45.5 and $7.7,$7.1, respectively.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
56
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
COMMON COMMON CAPITAL ACCUMULATED
SHARES STOCK IN EXCESS OTHER TREASURY TOTAL
(100,000,000 $1.00 PAR OF PAR RETAINED COMPREHENSIVE TREASURY STOCK AT STOCKHOLDERS'
AUTHORIZED) VALUE VALUE EARNINGS LOSS SHARES COST EQUITY
------------ --------- --------- -------- ------------- ---------- -------- -------------
(IN MILLIONS EXPECTEXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA)
Balance at December 31,
2002 .....................2002................................. 50,940,351 $ 50.9 $ 442.1 $ 672.6 $ (34.9) (5,040,709) $ (129.1) $ 1,001.6
Net loss .................loss............................. -- -- -- (14.5)(11.0) -- -- -- (14.5)(11.0)
Currency translation
adjustments ............adjustments........................ -- -- -- -- 0.42.8 -- -- 0.42.8
Unrealized gainloss on
derivative financial
instruments ............instruments........................ -- -- -- -- 0.5(0.5) -- -- 0.5(0.5)
---------
Comprehensive net loss ... (13.6).............. (8.7)
Cash dividends ($0.060.12
per share) ...................................... -- -- -- (2.8)(5.6) -- -- -- (2.8)
Other ....................(5.6)
Other................................ -- -- (0.9)(4.7) -- -- 49,500 1.7 0.8
----------- --------- ---------333,093 10.3 5.6
---------- ------ -------- ---------------- ------- ---------- -------- ---------
Balance at March 31,June 30, 2003 ................ 50,940,351 $ 50.9 $ 441.2437.4 $ 655.3656.0 $ (34.0) (4,991,209)(32.6) (4,707,616) $ (127.4)(118.8) $ 986.0
=========== ========= =========992.9
========== ====== ======== ================ ======= ========== ======== =========
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
67
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The foregoing consolidated financial statements are unaudited and have been
prepared from the books and records of Trinity Industries, Inc. ("Trinity" or
the "Company"). In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting only
of normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the
financial position of the Company as of March 31,June 30, 2003 and the results of
operations and cash flows for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2003 and
2002, and cash-flows for the six month period ended March 31,June 30, 2003 and 2002, in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, have been made.
Because of seasonal and other factors, the results of operations for the
three-month periodand six-month periods ended March 31,June 30, 2003 may not be indicative of
expected results of operations for the year ending December 31, 2003. These
interim financial statements and notes are condensed as permitted by the
instructions to Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the audited
consolidated financial statements of the Company included in its Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2002.
NOTE 2. UNUSUAL CHARGES
Restructuring reserve activity for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 was:
RESERVES RESERVES
DECEMBER 31, RECLASSIFI- MARCH 31,JUNE 30,
2002 PAYMENT CATIONS 2003
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------
(in millions)------- ----------- --------
(IN MILLIONS)
Property, plant & equipment
-- write-downs to net realizable value ...............shut down costs ..................... $ 4.6 $ 0.20.3 $ (4.3) $ --
$ 4.4
Environmental liabilities ..............................liabilities................. 10.6 0.5 (10.1) --
-- 10.6
Severance costs ........................................costs........................... 0.6 0.10.4 (0.2) -- 0.5
Adverse jury verdict ...................................verdict...................... 14.8 0.1 (14.7) --
-- 14.8
Other ..................................................Other..................................... 0.4 -- (0.2) 0.2
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------(0.4) --
------- ------ ----------- ------
$ 31.0 $ 0.31.3 $ (0.2)(29.7) $ 30.5
============ ============ ------------ ============--
======= ====== ======= ======
The lawsuit representing the adverse jury verdict was resolved during the
three-month period ended June 30, 2003 for $9.9 million. This amount was paid in
July 2003 and the balance of the restructuring reserve was reclassified to the
Company's litigation reserves. The restructuring reserves related to
environmental liabilities were reclassified to the Company's environmental
reserves. Amounts for shut down costs, severance costs and other have been
reclassified to other accrued liabilities. None of the reclassifications
impacted operating profit.
NOTE 3. SEGMENT INFORMATION
The Company reports operating results in the following business segments:
(1) the Trinity Rail group, which manufactures and sells railcars and component
parts; (2) the Construction Products group, which manufactures and sells highway
guardrail and safety products, concrete and aggregate, girders and beams used in
the construction of highway and railway bridges, and weld fittings used in
pressure piping systems; (3) the Inland Barge group, which manufactures and
sells barges and related products for inland waterway services; (4) the
Industrial Products group, which manufactures and sells container heads and
pressure and non-pressure containers for the storage and transportation of
liquefied gases and other liquid and dry products; and (5) the Trinity Railcar
Leasing and Management Services group, which provides services such as fleet
management and leasing. Finally, All Other includes the Company's captive
insurance and transportation companies, structural towers, and other peripheral
businesses.
Sales and related profits from Trinity Rail group to Trinity Railcar
Leasing and Management Services group are recorded in Trinity Rail group and
eliminated in consolidation. Sales of railcars from the lease fleet are included
in the Trinity Railcar Leasing and Management Services group segment. Sales
among groups are recorded at prices comparable to those charged external
customers.
78
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2003
REVENUES OPERATING
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROFIT
OUTSIDE INTERSEGMENT TOTAL (LOSS)
--------- ------------ ------------ ------------ --------------------- ---------
(IN MILLIONS)
Trinity Rail Group .....................Group......................... $ 84.0106.8 $ 65.147.9 $ 149.1154.7 $ (10.3)(6.1)
Construction Products Group ............ 103.4Group................ 132.2 0.1 103.5 3.1132.3 15.3
Inland Barge Group ..................... 44.1Group......................... 43.2 -- 44.1 (0.8)43.2 1.0
Industrial Products Group ..............Group.................. 27.7 0.8 28.5 --1.6
Trinity Railcar Leasing and
Management Services Group ............ 28.5Group................ 54.3 -- 28.5 8.654.3 12.6
All Other .............................. 1.4 5.9 7.3 (0.9)Other.................................. 1.6 6.1 7.7 (2.1)
Eliminations & Corporate
Items ................................Items.................................... -- (71.9) (71.9) (11.1)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------(54.9) (54.9) (11.9)
--------- -------- --------- --------
Consolidated Total .....................Total......................... $ 289.1365.8 $ -- $ 289.1365.8 $ (11.4)
============ ============ ============ ============10.4
========= ======== ========= ========
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2002
REVENUES OPERATING
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PROFIT
OUTSIDE INTERSEGMENT TOTAL (LOSS)
--------- ------------ ------------ ------------ -------------------- ---------
(IN MILLIONS)
Trinity Rail Group .........................Group......................... $ 150.6101.1 $ 20.538.3 $ 171.1139.4 $ (12.2)(12.8)
Construction Products Group ................. 112.6 0.5 113.1 7.5Group................ 146.0 0.2 146.2 17.2
Inland Barge Group .......................... 61.2Group......................... 57.9 -- 61.2 1.957.9 1.1
Industrial Products Group ................... 30.7 0.6 31.3 0.9Group.................. 32.4 0.5 32.9 (1.6)
Trinity Railcar Leasing and Management
Services Group ............................ 26.7Group........................... 26.9 -- 26.726.9 7.1
All Other ................................... 2.5 6.7 9.2 (2.9)Other.................................. 1.7 6.5 8.2 (0.9)
Eliminations & Corporate Items ..............Items............. -- (28.3) (28.3) (6.5)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------(45.5) (45.5) (6.9)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total ..........................Total......................... $ 384.3366.0 $ -- $ 384.3366.0 $ (4.2)
============ ============ ============ ============3.2
======== ======== ======== ========
8SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003
REVENUES OPERATING
--------------------------------------- PROFIT
OUTSIDE INTERSEGMENT TOTAL (LOSS)
--------- ------------ --------- ---------
(IN MILLIONS)
Trinity Rail Group......................... $ 190.8 $ 113.0 $ 303.8 $ (16.4)
Construction Products Group................ 235.6 0.2 235.8 18.4
Inland Barge Group......................... 87.3 -- 87.3 0.2
Industrial Products Group.................. 55.4 1.6 57.0 1.6
Trinity Railcar Leasing and
Management Services Group................ 82.8 -- 82.8 21.2
All Other.................................. 3.0 12.0 15.0 (3.0)
Eliminations & Corporate
Items.................................... -- (126.8) (126.8) (23.0)
--------- -------- --------- --------
Consolidated Total......................... $ 654.9 $ -- $ 654.9 $ (1.0)
========= ======== ========= ========
9
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
REVENUES OPERATING
--------------------------------------- PROFIT
OUTSIDE INTERSEGMENT TOTAL (LOSS)
--------- ------------ --------- ---------
(IN MILLIONS)
Trinity Rail Group......................... $ 251.7 $ 58.8 $ 310.5 $ (25.0)
Construction Products Group................ 258.6 0.7 259.3 24.7
Inland Barge Group......................... 119.1 -- 119.1 3.0
Industrial Products Group.................. 63.1 1.1 64.2 (0.7)
Trinity Railcar Leasing and Management
Services Group........................... 53.6 -- 53.6 14.2
All Other.................................. 4.2 13.2 17.4 (3.8)
Eliminations & Corporate Items............. -- (73.8) (73.8) (13.4)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Consolidated Total......................... $ 750.3 $ -- $ 750.3 $ (1.0)
======== ======== ======== ========
NOTE 4. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
The Company has elected to apply the accounting provisions of
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees," (APB No. 25) and its interpretations and, accordingly, no
compensation cost has been recorded for the stock options. The effect of
computing compensation cost in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 123, "Accounting for Stock Based Compensation," and the weighted average
fair value of options granted during the quarterthree and six months ended March 31,June 30,
2003 and 2002 using the Black-Scholes option pricing method are shown in the
accompanying table.
THREE MONTHS THREEENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
ENDED
MARCH 31, MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2003 JUNE 30, 2002 ------------ ------------JUNE 30, 2003 JUNE 30, 2002
------------- ------------- ------------- -------------
Pro forma (in millions):
Net loss,income (loss), as reported .....................reported............ $ (14.5)3.5 $ (8.6)(5.7) $ (11.0) $ (14.3)
Deduct: Total stock based employee
compensation expense determined
under fair value based method for
all awards, net of related income
tax effects ............................. (1.2) (1.2)
------------ ------------effects............................ (0.8) (1.1) ( 2.0) (2.3)
---------- --------- ---------- ----------
Pro forma net loss ..........................income (loss) .............. $ (15.7)2.7 $ (9.8)
============ ============(6.8) $ (13.0) $ (16.6)
========== ========= ========== ==========
Per diluted share ...........................share......................... $ (0.35)0.06 $ (0.22)
============ ============(0.15) $ ( 0.29) $ (0.37)
========== ========= ========== ==========
Net lossincome (loss) per diluted share -
as reported ....reported............................. $ 0.08 $ (0.13) $ ( 0.24) $ (0.32)
========== ========= ========== ==========
10
Note 5. Property, Plant and Equipment
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
2003 2002
---- ----
(IN MILLIONS)
Corporate/Manufacturing:
Property, plant and equipment............ $ (0.19)
============ ============954.5 $ 901.8
Accumulated depreciation................. (559.4) (493.6)
-------- ----------
395.1 408.2
-------- ----------
Leasing:
Equipment on lease....................... $ 739.3 $ 650.0
Accumulated depreciation................. (119.8) (110.8)
-------- ----------
619.5 539.2
-------- ----------
$1,014.6 $ 947.4
======== ==========
NOTE 5.6. WARRANTIES
The Company provides for the estimated cost of product warranties at the
time revenue is recognized and assesses the adequacy of the resulting reserves
on a quarterly basis. As of March 31,June 30, 2003, the change in the accruals for
warranties since December 31 was as follows:
MARCH 31,
--------------------------------THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, JUNE 30,
-------- --------
2003 2002 -------------- --------------2003 2002
---- ---- ---- ----
(IN MILLIONS)
Beginning balance ........balance............. $ 22.0 $ 16.4 $ 20.8 $ 18.1
Additions ................Additions..................... 2.2 4.8 3.6
Reductions ............... (3.6) (5.3)
-------------- --------------7.0 8.4
Reductions.................... (2.7) (5.4) (6.3) (10.7)
-------- -------- -------- --------
Ending balance ...........balance................ $ 22.021.5 $ 16.4
============== ==============15.8 $ 21.5 $ 15.8
======== ======== ======== ========
NOTE 6.7. DEBT
JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31,
2003 2002
---- ----
(IN MILLIONS)
Corporate/Manufacturing:
Revolving commitment..................... $ -- $ 48.0
Term commitment.......................... 148.5 149.3
Other.................................... 5.6 6.4
-------- ----------
154.1 203.7
-------- ----------
Leasing:
Equipment trust certificates............. $ 170.0 $ 171.4
Warehouse facility....................... 167.8 113.8
-------- ----------
337.8 285.2
-------- ----------
$ 491.9 $ 488.9
======== ==========
In June 2002, the Company completed a secured credit agreement for $425
million. The agreement includes a $275 million 3-year revolving commitment and a
$150 million 5-year term commitment. The agreement calls for quarterly payments
of principal on the term debt in the amount of $375 thousand beginning September
30, 2002 through June 30, 2006 and quarterly payments of $36.0 million beginning
on September 30, 2006 through the maturity date. Amounts borrowed under the
revolving commitment bear interest at LIBOR plus 2.00%, (there were no borrowings
on March 31,June 30, 2003). Effective July 2, 2003 the interest rate on the revolving
credit commitment was LIBOR plus 2.25%. Amounts borrowed under the term
commitment bear interest at LIBOR plus 3.25% (4.81%(4.61% at March 31,June 30, 2003). A portion of theThe
Company's accounts receivable and inventory and a portion of its property, plant
and equipment secure the agreement. The agreement limits the amount of capital
expenditures related to the Company's leasing business, requires maintenance of
ratios related to interest coverage, leverage, asset coverage, and minimum net
worth, and restricts the amount of dividend payments. At March 31,June 30, 2003, $148.9
9
$148.5
million was borrowed under this agreement and $193.9 million was available under
the facility.agreement. At March 31,June 30, 2003, the most
restrictive of the debt covenants based on trailing twelve month calculations as
defined by the debt agreements allow approximately $81.1$97.4 million
11
additional principal and approximately $11.3$14.7 million additional annual interest
expense. The most significant factor in the Company's debt covenant calculations
is earnings for the immediately preceding twelve months.
In June 2002 Trinity Industries Leasing Company ("TILC") through a newly
formed, wholly owned business trust entered into a $200 million non-recourse
warehouse facility to finance or refinance railcars acquired or owned by TILC.
Specific railcars and the underlying leases secure the facility. Advances under
the facility may not exceed 75% of the fair market value of the eligible
railcars securing the facility less any excluded assets as defined by the agreement. Advances under the
facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.375% (2.59%(2.695% at March
31,June 30, 2003). TheTILC
extended the facility expiresfrom June 2003 to August 2003 and advances under the
facility, if not renewed, are repayable in six-month increments with the final
payment due December 2004.February, 2005. At March 31,June 30, 2003, $29.2$32.2 million was available under
this facility. The Company is currently in discussions with long-term lenders to
provide permanent financing for the amount currently outstanding under the
facility, which is expected to be completed in September 2003 and to renew the
warehouse facility for future financings or refinancings of railcars acquired or owned by TILC.
Terms and conditions of other debt are described in the Annual Report.
Principal payments on total debt due during the next five years as of March 31,June
30, 2003 are (in millions) for the remaining ninesix months of 2003 - $60.1;$1.2; 2004 -
$115.4;$114.0; 2005 - $41.9;$97.9; 2006 - $83.2; 2007 - $115.7; and $79.9 thereafter.
NOTE 7.8. SALE/LEASEBACK FINANCING
During the nine months ended December 31, 2001, the Company completed an
off balance sheet financing arrangement for $199.0 million in railcars. Trinity
sold the railcars to an independent trust. The trust financed the purchase of
the railcars with $151.3 million in debt and $47.7 million in equity provided by
large independent financial institutions. The equity investor in the trust has
the risk of ownership of the assets in the trust except for the $6.5 million of
cash collateral discussed herein. Trinity has made no guarantees with respect to
amounts at risk. An independent trustee for the trust has the authority for the
appointment of the railcar fleet manager. Trinity, through a newly formed,
wholly owned qualified subsidiary, leased railcars from the trust and subleased
the railcars to independent third party customers.
Under the terms of the operating lease agreement, Trinity has the option to
purchase the railcars from the trust at the end of sixteen yearsin 2017 at a predetermined, fixed price.
Trinity also has an option to purchase the railcars at the end of the lease
agreement in 2023 at the then fair market value of the railcars. At the
expiration of the operating lease agreement, Trinity has no further obligation
or ownership interest in the assets of the trust.there under.
Included in the Company's accompanying consolidated balance sheet are cash
and company-owned railcars totaling $33.1$29.8 million which are in the qualified
subsidiary and pledged as collateral for the duration of the lease obligations
to the trust and additional $6.5$6.6 million of cash which is pledged as collateral
for the equity investor's investment. Trinity, under the terms of a servicing
and remarketing agreement, will endeavor, consistent with customary commercial
practice as would be used by a prudent person, to maintain railcars under lease
for the benefit of the trust. Trinity also receives management fees under the
terms of the agreement. Certain ratios must be maintained in order for excess
cash flow, as defined, from the lease to third parties, to be available to
Trinity.
The sale of the railcars by Trinity to the trust was accounted for as a
sale/leaseback transaction. No revenue or profit was recorded at the time of the
transaction and all profit was deferred and is being amortized over the term of
the operating lease. Neither the assets, the liabilities, nor equity of the
trust are reflected on the balance sheet of Trinity.
NOTE 8.9. DEPOSIT AGREEMENT
The Company has a deposit agreement with Altos Hornos de Mexico, SA de C.V.
("AHMSA") whichthat provides for funds to be deposited with AHMSA whichthat are then used
along with other funds from the Company to purchase steel from AHMSA. As of March 31,June
30, 2003, total funds on deposit including interest due amounted to
approximately $31.8$29.2 million. Since May 1999 AHMSA has been operating under a
judicial declaration of suspension of payments,
10
which under applicable Mexican
law, allows companies in Mexico to (1) seek a debt restructuring agreement with
their creditors in an orderly fashion; (2) continue their operations; and (3)
avoid declaration of bankruptcy and liquidation of assets. The Company's
understanding of Mexican law is that all funds on deposit are required to be
returned to the Company regardless of whether the supplier is able to operate
under the declaration of suspension of payments. Trinity reduced $3.6$3.4 million of
this deposit through inventory purchases in the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2003. The
timing of future reductions of the deposit balance will depend on the rate of
future steel purchases.
12
NOTE 9.10. SERIES B REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK
In June 2003 the Company issued 600 shares of Series B Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock (Series B preferred stock). Each share of Series B
preferred stock has an initial liquidation value of $100,000 per share. The
liquidation value, plus accrued but unpaid dividends, is payable on June 25,
2008, the mandatory redemption date, at the option of the Company in cash or in
shares of common stock valued at 90% of the then current market price of the
Company's common stock. Each share of Series B preferred stock may be converted
at any time at the option of the holder into shares of the Company's common
stock, based on the initial conversion price of $22.46 per share, which is
equivalent to 4,452 shares of common stock for each $100,000 initial liquidation
preference. Holders of the Series B preferred stock are entitled to receive
dividends payable semi-annually, on July 1 and January 1 of each year, beginning
January 1, 2004 at an annual rate of 4.5% of the liquidation preference. The
Company may, at its option, pay dividends either in cash or in shares of the
Company's common stock at the then current market price. The holders of shares
of Series B preferred stock are entitled to vote with the holders of the common
stock on an as-if converted basis on all matters brought before the
stockholders. The Series B preferred stock has been classified outside the
Stockholders' Equity section because there is not absolute assurance that the
number of authorized and unissued common shares would be adequate to redeem the
Series B preferred stock. At June 30, 2003, the number of shares authorized and
unissued would be adequate to redeem the Series B preferred stock as long as the
market value of the Company's common stock was at least $1.37 per share.
NOTE 11. OTHER, NET
Other (income) expense consists of the following items (in millions):
THREE MONTHS ENDED
MARCH 31,
----------------------------Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June 30, June 30,
-------- --------
2003 2002 ------------ ------------2003 2002
---- ---- ---- ----
Gain on sale of property, plant
and equipment .............equipment.................. $ (1.4)(3.0) $ (0.2) $ (4.4) $ (0.4)
Foreign exchange
transactions .................... 0.1 0.2transactions.................... (0.1) 0.8 -- 1.0
Loss on equity investments .....................investments........ 0.5 0.7
Other .............................0.3 1.0 1.0
Other............................. -- -- -- (0.2)
------------ ------------------ ------ ------ ------
Other, net ...................... $ (0.8)(2.6) $ 0.5
============ ============0.9 $ (3.4) $ 1.4
====== ====== ====== ======
NOTE 10.12. CONTINGENCIES
The Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, included in the
Inland Barge Group, Trinity Marine
Products, Inc. ("TMP"), and certain material suppliers and others, are
co-defendants in fivesix separate lawsuits filed by Florida Marine Transporters, Inc. ("FMT")a number of plaintiffs on
May 15, 2002, J. Russell Flowers,
Inc. ("Flowers") on October 7, 2002, ACF Barge Acceptance I, LLC ("ACF") on
December 4, 2002, Marquette Transportation Company and Iowa Fleeting Services,
Inc. ("Marquette") on March 7, 2003, and Waxler Transportation Company, Inc.
("Waxler") on April 7, 2003. The FMT, ACF, Marquette and Waxler cases are
pending in the 25th Judicial District Court in Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana,
and the Flowers case is pending in the U.S. District Court, Northern District of
Mississippi in Greenville, Mississippi.various dates. In the Waxlerone case, the plaintiff has petitioned the court for
certification of a class. If a class, action is
certified by the court,which would increase the total number of barges
involved in the litigation
will increase.litigation. Absent certification of a class in the Waxlerthat case, these
fivesix separate suits involve 2248 tank barges sold at an approximate average price
of $1.5$1.4 million, and 140 hopper barges sold at an approximate average price of
$280,000. Each of the cases setsets forth allegations pertaining to damages arising
from alleged defects in coating materials supplied by a co-defendant and
workmanship by TMP. The plaintiffs seek both compensatory and punitive damages
and/or recision of the barge purchase contracts. Independent experts
investigating the claims have expressed the opinion that technical arguments
presented by the plaintiffs in the litigation are without merit. Two of the
five plaintiffs owe TMP approximately $10.9$11.2 million, of which $5.2$6.7 million is past
due, related to contracts for barges not involved in the litigation. TMP is in the process of
filinghas
filed suit and a claim for collection of the past due amount.
In March 2003, a jury awarded $163.7 million to an independent contractor's
employee who died following an accident while working at the site
of a Company subsidiary's
aggregate mining operation. The presiding judge in the case has requested the parties mediate pending entry ofentered a final
judgement. The
trial court retainsjudgment in the authority to reduce or vacate the award,amount of $33.9 million (inclusive of fees, costs and the
Company's subsidiary intends to appeal if necessary. Management believesjudgment
interest). It is expected that
the amounts not covered by insurance in this case will not be material to the
Company's financial position.appealed. Management believes
losses in excess of $3.0 million are covered by insurance.
The Company is also involved in other claims and lawsuits incidental to its
business. As a matter of course the Company will have settlement discussions
from time to time with various plaintiffs. Based on information currently available, it is management's opinion
that the ultimate outcome of litigatedall current litigation and other claims, through settlement or otherwise,including
settlements, in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company's overall financial condition for purposes of financial reporting.
However, resolution of certain claims or lawsuits by settlement or otherwise
could have a significant impact on the operating results of the
13
reporting period in which such resolution occurs.
11
The Company is subject to federal, state, local, and foreign laws and
regulations relating to the environment and to work places.workplaces. The Company believes
that it is currently in substantial compliance with such laws and the
regulations promulgated thereunder.
The Company is involved in various proceedings relating to environmental
matters. The Company has provided reserves amounting to $18.1$19.4 million to cover
probable and estimable liabilities of the Company with respect to such
investigations and cleanup activities, taking into account currently available
information and the Company's contractual rights of indemnification. However,
estimates of future response costs are necessarily imprecise. Accordingly, there
can be no assurance that the Company will not become involved in future
litigation or other proceedings or, if the Company were found to be responsible
or liable in any litigation or proceeding, that such costs would not be material
to the Company.
NOTE 11.13. NET INCOME (LOSS) PER SHARE
Diluted net income per common share is based on the weighted average shares
outstanding plus the assumed exercisedilutive impact of dilutive stock options less the
number of treasury shares assumed to be purchased from the proceeds using the
average market price of Trinity's commonand Series B preferred
stock. Basic net income per common share is based on the weighted average number
of common shares outstanding for the period. The numerator for both basic net
income (loss) per common share and diluted net income (loss) per common share is
net income (loss). Dividends attributable to the Series B preferred stock were
immaterial. The difference between the denominator in the basic calculation and
the denominator in the diluted calculation isfor the three months ended June 30,
2003 was attributable to the effect of employee stock options. Employee stock
options were antidilutive for all other periods presented. The Series B
preferred stock was antidilutive and therefore not considered in the diluted net
income (loss) per common share calculation.
NOTE 12.14. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 143 "Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations" (SFAS 143). SFAS 143 addresses financial accounting and
reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived
assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal
obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets that result from
the acquisition, construction, development and/or the normal operations of a
long-lived asset, except for certain obligations of lessees. SFAS 143 is
effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June
15, 2002. The Company adopted SFAS 143 on January 1, 2003 and it did not have a
material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 146, "Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities" (SFAS 146). SFAS 146 nullifies
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3 "Liability Recognition for Certain
Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including
Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)." SFAS 146 applies to costs
associated with an exit activity that does not involve an entity newly acquired
in a business combination or with a disposal activity covered by SFAS 144. SFAS
146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after
December 31, 2002, with earlier application encouraged. The Company adopted SFAS
146 and while it did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial
statements it will impact the timing of charges, which could impact the
comparability of results among reporting periods.
During January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 "Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities" (FIN 46). The consolidation requirements of FIN
46 apply immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31,
2003 and apply to existing variable interest entities in the first fiscal year
or interim periods beginning after June 15, 2003. Until now, one company
generally has included another entity in its consolidated financial statements
only if it controlled the entity through voting interests. Interpretation 46
requires a variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that
company is subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest
entity's activities or entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual
returns or both. A company that consolidates a variable interest entity is
called the primary beneficiary of that entity. Certain of the disclosure
requirements apply in all financial statements issued after January 31, 2003,
regardless of when the variable interest entity was established. The Company is
evaluating whether or not it would be designated the primary beneficiary of the
independent trust which purchases railcars from the Company in a sale/leaseback
transaction as described in Note 7.8. Currently, the Company believes that it is
not the primary beneficiary and therefore will not be required to consolidate
the Trust.
12In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 150, "Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity" (SFAS
150). SFAS 150 establishes standards for how a company classifies and measures
in its statement of financial position certain financial instruments with
characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that a company
classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an
asset in some circumstances) because that financial instrument embodies an
obligation of the issuer. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments
entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the
beginning of the first period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does
not expect the provisions of this statement to have a significant impact on the
statement of financial position.
14
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS.
GENERAL
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the unaudited
consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere
in this document.
Trinity is one of the nation's leading diversified industrial companies
providing a variety of products and services for the transportation, industrial,
construction, and energy sectors of the marketplace.
In March 2003, Trinity terminated its previously announced agreement to
sell its railcar repair business. Trinity will continue to operate its existing
network of repair facilities.
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2003 COMPARED WITH THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2002
- -- RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues decreased $95.2 million to $289.1were $365.8 million for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2003
compared to $384.3$366.0 million for the three months ended March
31, 2002,June 30, 2002. Increased
railcar sales and lease revenue were offset by a decrease of 24.8%. The decline in revenues was due to the reduction
in railcar revenue due to product mix, a reductiondemand in the construction products
and all other
groups due to exiting several lines of business and general market
declines, offset by an increase in leasing revenues resulting from an increase
in the lease fleet.segments.
The following table reconciles the revenue amounts discussed under each
segment with the consolidated total revenues shown in the Selected Financial
Data (in millions).
THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2003 THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2002
------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
REVENUES REVENUES
------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------
OUTSIDE INTERSEGMENT TOTAL OUTSIDE INTERSEGMENT TOTAL
------- ------------ ------- ------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ -------------------
Trinity Rail Group ................Group.............. $ 84.0106.8 $ 65.147.9 $ 149.1154.7 $ 150.6101.1 $ 20.538.3 $ 171.1139.4
Construction Products Group ....... 103.4Group..... 132.2 0.1 103.5 112.6 0.5 113.1132.3 146.0 0.2 146.2
Inland Barge Group ................ 44.1Group.............. 43.2 -- 44.1 61.243.2 57.9 -- 61.257.9
Industrial Products Group .........Group....... 27.7 0.8 28.5 30.7 0.6 31.332.4 0.5 32.9
Trinity Railcar Leasing and
Management Services Group ......... 28.5Group..... 54.3 -- 28.5 26.754.3 26.9 -- 26.726.9
All Other ......................... 1.4 5.9 7.3 2.5 6.7 9.2Other....................... 1.6 6.1 7.7 1.7 6.5 8.2
Eliminations & Corporate Items ....Items.. -- (71.9) (71.9)(54.9) (54.9) -- (28.3) (28.3)
------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------(45.5) (45.5)
------- -------- ------- ------- -------- -------
Consolidated Total ................Total.............. $ 289.1365.8 $ -- $ 289.1365.8 $ 384.3366.0 $ -- $ 384.3
============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============366.0
======= ======== ======= ======= ======== =======
Operating lossprofit increased $7.2 million to $11.4$10.4 million for the three
months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 compared to $4.2$3.2 million for the same period in 2002.
This was primarily due to a decrease in revenues due to lower unitincreased railcar sales and competitive pricing pressures, the implementation of a new financial system,
and the impact of under absorbed overhead costs offset slightly by a decrease in
selling, engineering and administrative expenses.lease operations. During
the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company signed a managed services contract
to implement a new financial system and to outsource certain accounting and
processing activities. While expected to produce overall savings in future
years, this project is expected to increaseresult in incremental selling, engineering
and administrative costs in 2003 byof approximately fifteen$9.6 million or $0.15 cents
per share compared to the prior year. During the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2003 the
Company's incremental costs were approximately $2.6 million or $.04 per share.
Selling, engineering and administrative expensesInterest expense decreased $1.0$1.9 million to $39.5$8.4 million for the three
months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 compared to $40.5
million for the comparable period in 2002, a decrease of 2.5%. The decrease
primarily consisted of the benefits of the Company's cost reduction efforts
including lower headcounts offset by the incremental costs associated with the
implementation of the new financial system.
Interest expense, net of interest income, increased $2.7 million to $9.4
million for the three months ended March 31, 2003 compared to $6.7$10.3 million for the same period in
2002, an increasea decrease of 40.3%18.4%. This increaseThe decrease was dueprimarily attributable to higher
averagethe charge
off of $1.3 million in debt levelsissuance costs in the prior quarter and slightly higherlower
interest rates.
13
Other, net was income of $0.8$2.6 million for the three months ended March 31,June 30,
2003 compared to expense of $0.5$0.9 million for the comparable period in 2002. The
increase was due to a larger amount of gains on sale of property, plant and
equipment in 2003 and foreign currency losses in 2002.
The current year effective tax rate of 27.5% was due to the currentabsence of tax
benefits on certain foreign losses.
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2003 was $3.5 million, or
$0.08 per diluted share as compared to a net loss of $5.7 million, or a loss of
$0.13 per diluted share, for the same period in 2002.
TRINITY RAIL GROUP
THREE MONTHS
ENDED
JUNE 30,
------------------
2003 2002
------- -------
(IN MILLIONS)
Revenues............................................. $ 154.7 $ 139.4
Operating loss....................................... $ (6.1) $ (12.8)
Operating loss margin................................ (3.9)% (9.2)%
Railcar units shipped in North America increased 56.6% to approximately
1,500 cars during the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to the same
period lastin 2002. Revenues increased 11.0% for the three months ended June 30,
2003 compared to the same
15
period in 2002 due to the product mix of units sold in North America. Railcar
units shipped in Europe increased by 28.9% to approximately 600 units. Operating
margins improved due to improved efficiencies from the increase in volume and
collection of previously reserved amounts.
In the three months ended June 30, 2003 railcar sales to Trinity Industries
Leasing Company included in the Rail Group results were $45.9 million compared
to $37.0 million in the comparable period in 2002 with profit of $3.7 million
compared to $1.4 million for the same period in 2002. Sales to Trinity
Industries Leasing Company and related profits are eliminated in consolidation.
CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS GROUP
THREE MONTHS
ENDED
JUNE 30,
------------------
2003 2002
------- -------
(IN MILLIONS)
Revenues............................................. $ 132.3 $ 146.2
Operating profit..................................... $ 15.3 $ 17.2
Operating profit margin.............................. 11.6% 11.8%
Revenues declined 9.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared to
the same period in 2002. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to
a lower demand in Highway Safety and Fittings products along with reduced
production in the Structural Bridge group, partially offset by improvements in
the Concrete and Aggregates group due to strong demand and good weather.
Operating profit margin decreased slightly as a result of reduced volume and
competitive pricing pressures.
INLAND BARGE GROUP
THREE MONTHS
ENDED
JUNE 30,
------------------
2003 2002
------- -------
(IN MILLIONS)
Revenues.......................................... $ 43.2 $ 57.9
Operating profit.................................. $ 1.0 $ 1.1
Operating profit margin........................... 2.3% 1.9%
Revenues decreased 25.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared
to the same period in 2002. This was primarily due to a decrease in hopper barge
sales. Operating profit remained relatively constant compared to the prior
year's quarter at $1.0 million for the current quarter. This was primarily due
to the reduction in hopper barge volume offset by reduced overhead costs for the
quarter. Barge litigation costs were $0.8 and $0.9 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS GROUP
THREE MONTHS
ENDED
JUNE 30,
------------------
2003 2002
------- -------
(IN MILLIONS)
Revenues........................................... $ 28.5 $ 32.9
Operating profit (loss)............................ $ 1.6 $ (1.6)
Operating profit (loss) margin..................... 5.6% (4.9)%
Revenues declined 13.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2003 compared
to the same period in 2002. The decline in revenues was primarily due to the
sale of the cold-forming heads business in the United States. The increase in
operating profit was primarily due to the establishment of a $2.2 million
allowance for bad debt in the prior year as well as an improvement of margins in
the US LPG business.
16
TRINITY RAILCAR LEASING AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP
THREE MONTHS
ENDED
JUNE 30,
------------------
2003 2002
------- -------
(IN MILLIONS)
Revenues....................................... $ 54.3 $ 26.9
Operating profit............................... $ 12.6 $ 7.1
Operating profit margin........................ 23.2% 26.4%
Revenues increased $27.4 million to $54.3 million in the current quarter.
This increase was primarily due to railcar sales and an increase in rental
revenues from additions to the lease fleet. Revenues from the sale of railcars
from the lease fleet were $25.4 million in the three months ended June 30, 2003
and $0.3 million in the same period in 2002. Operating profit increased $5.5
million to $12.6 million in the current quarter. Operating profits on the sale
of railcars from the lease fleet were $3.1 million, including recognition of
deferred manufacturing profit, in the current quarter and $0.1 million for the
prior year. Profit also increased due to the growth in the lease fleet,
partially offset by an increase in operating and administrative expenses due to
regulatory mandated repairs and railroad charges.
ALL OTHER
Revenues in All Other decreased primarily due to a decline in the
structural tower business. Operating loss was $2.1 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2003, and $0.9 million in the same period in 2002. The increase
in the operating loss is primarily due to costs associated with non-operating
plants.
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 COMPARED WITH SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002 -
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Revenues decreased $95.4 million to $654.9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2003 compared to $750.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2002,
a decrease of 12.7%. The decrease in revenues was due to a reduction in rail car
sales to third parties, offset by an increase in railcar sales from the leasing
fleet and increased leasing revenues due to growth in the lease fleet.
The following table reconciles the revenue amounts discussed under each
segment with the consolidated total revenues shown in the Selected Financial
Data (in millions).
SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2003 SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2002
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
REVENUES REVENUES
------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------
OUTSIDE INTERSEGMENT TOTAL OUTSIDE INTERSEGMENT TOTAL
------- ------------ ------- ------- ------------ -------
Trinity Rail Group............... $ 190.8 $ 113.0 $ 303.8 $ 251.7 $ 58.8 $ 310.5
Construction Products Group...... 235.6 0.2 235.8 258.6 0.7 259.3
Inland Barge Group............... 87.3 -- 87.3 119.1 -- 119.1
Industrial Products Group........ 55.4 1.6 57.0 63.1 1.1 64.2
Trinity Railcar Leasing and
Management Services Group........ 82.8 -- 82.8 53.6 -- 53.6
All Other........................ 3.0 12.0 15.0 4.2 13.2 17.4
Eliminations & Corporate Items... -- (126.8) (126.8) -- (73.8) (73.8)
------- -------- ------- ------- -------- -------
Consolidated Total............... $ 654.9 $ -- $ 654.9 $ 750.3 $ -- $ 750.3
======= ======== ======= ======= ======== =======
Operating loss was $1.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2003 and
for the same period in 2002. For the six months ended June 30, 2003 compared to
the same period in 2002, operating loss was impacted by the decrease in revenues
as described above for the period, competitive pricing pressures, the
implementation of a new financial system, and the impact of under absorbed
overhead costs. During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Company signed a
managed services contract to implement a new financial system and to outsource
certain accounting and processing activities. During the six month period ended
June 30, 2003 the Company's incremental costs were approximately $5.2 million or
$.08 per share.
Interest expense increased $0.6 million to $17.9 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2003 compared to $17.3 million for the same period in 2002. This
increase was due to higher average debt levels and higher interest rates for the
six-month period, offset by the charge off of $1.3 million in debt issuance
costs in the prior six months.
Other, net was income of $3.4 million for the six months ended June 30,
2003 compared to expense of $1.4 million for the comparable period in 2002. The
income in 2003 was due to a larger amount of gains on sale of property, plant
and equipment and
17
foreign currency losses in 2002.
The current year effective tax rate of 27.5% was due to the absence of tax
benefits on certain foreign losses.
Net loss for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 was $14.5$11.0 million, or $0.32$0.24
per diluted share as compared to a net loss of $8.6$14.3 million, or $0.19$0.32 per
diluted share, for the same period in 20022002.
TRINITY RAIL GROUP
THREESIX MONTHS
ENDED
MARCH 31,
-----------------------------JUNE 30,
-------------------
2003 2002
------------ ------------------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
Revenues ..................... $ 149.1 $ 171.1Revenues............................................. $303.8 $310.5
Operating loss....................................... $(16.4) $(25.0)
Operating loss ............... $ (10.3) $ (12.2)
Operating loss margin ........ (6.9)margin................................ (5.4)% (7.1)(8.1)%
Railcar units shipped in North America increased 37.1%45.6% to approximately
1,7003,200 cars during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 compared to the same period
in 2002. Revenues declined 12.9%showed a slight decline of 2.2% for the threesix months ended March 31,June
30, 2003 compared to the same period in 2002 due to the product mix of units
sold in North America. Railcar units shipped in Europe decreased by 23.9% towere approximately 460 units.1,080
units for both periods. A reduction in the repair business also contributed to
the year over year decline in revenues. Operating margins improved slightly due
to improved efficiencies from an increase in North American volume.
As of June 30, 2003, the North American backlog increased 240% to
approximately 10,600 cars as compared to the same period last year. With a
current European backlog of 2,250 cars, total backlog was 12,850 cars.
In the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 railcar sales to Trinity Industries
Leasing Company included in the Rail Group results were $64.3$110.2 million compared
to $20.4$57.4 million in the comparable period in 2002 with profit of $3.9$7.6 million
compared to $0.9$2.3 million for the same period in 2002. Sales to Trinity
Industries Leasing Company and related profits are eliminated in consolidation.
CONSTRUCTION PRODUCTS GROUP
THREESIX MONTHS
ENDED
MARCH 31,
----------------------------JUNE 30,
-------------------
2003 2002
------------ ------------------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
Revenues .....................Revenues............................................. $235.8 $259.3
Operating profit..................................... $ 103.518.4 $ 113.124.7
Operating profit ............. $ 3.1 $ 7.5
Operating profit margin ...... 3.0% 6.6%margin.............................. 7.8% 9.5%
Revenues declined 8.5%9.1% for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 compared to
the same period in 2002. The decrease in revenues was primarily attributable to
exiting certain non-core product lines since the first quarter of 2002, a
loss of working days due to weather,lower
demand in Highway Safety products, and reduced volume and competitive pricing
pressures in the fittings business. Operating profit margin decreased as a
result of the increased costs associated with fuel and insurance, exiting
non-core product lines, reduced volume and competitive pricing pressures, partially offset by
a reduction in expenses due to efficiency improvements.
14
INLAND BARGE GROUP
THREESIX MONTHS
ENDED
MARCH 31,
-----------------------------JUNE 30,
-------------------
2003 2002
------------ ------------------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
Revenues ........................Revenues............................................. $ 44.187.3 $119.1
Operating profit..................................... $ 61.20.2 $ 3.0
Operating profit ................ $ (0.8) $ 1.9
Operating profit margin ......... (1.8)% 3.1%margin.............................. 0.2% 2.5%
Revenues decreased 27.9%26.7% for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 compared to
the same period in 2002. This was primarily due to a decrease in hopper barge
sales. Duringsales as a result of the current quarter 77 hopper barges were delivered
versus 145 during the same quarter of 2002, a 46.9% decrease or $14.9 million of
revenue. Due to weather conditions, two fewer tank barges were delivereddownturn in the current quarter comprising the remaining decrease in revenues.hopper barge market. Operating profit
decreased $2.7$2.8 million to a lossprofit of $0.8$0.2 million for the current quarter. This
declinechange was primarily due to the decreasedecline in the hopper barge volumes partially
18
offset by lower operating costs. Barge litigation costs were $1.4 and tank barge units
produced, unabsorbed overhead costs resulting from lower production levels and
expenses related to barge corrosion issues ($0.6$1.2
million for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 versus $0.3 million for the same quarter last year).and 2002, respectively.
INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTS GROUP
THREESIX MONTHS
ENDED
MARCH 31,
---------------------------JUNE 30,
-------------------
2003 2002
------------ ------------------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
Revenues ...............................Revenues........................................... $ 28.557.0 $ 31.364.2
Operating profit (loss) ............................................ $ --1.6 $ 0.9(0.7)
Operating profit (loss) margin ......... --% 2.9%margin..................... 2.8% (1.1%)
Revenues declined 8.9%11.2% for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 compared to
the same period in 2002. The decline in revenues was primarily due to reduced
head sales, lower average pricing on certain Mexico products, offset by improved
salesthe sale
of tanks and truck tanks.the cold-forming heads business in the United States. The declineincrease in
operating profit was primarily due to reduced salesthe establishment of a $2.2 million
allowance for bad debt in the head division, lower average pricing on certain
Mexico products, partially offset by improvedprior year as well as an improvement in margins on Mexico truck tanks.in
the US LPG business.
TRINITY RAILCAR LEASING AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES GROUP
THREESIX MONTHS
ENDED
MARCH 31,
----------------------------JUNE 30,
-------------------
2003 2002
------------ ------------------ ------
(IN MILLIONS)
Revenues ...............................Revenues........................................... $ 28.582.8 $ 26.753.6
Operating profit................................... $ 21.2 $ 14.2
Operating profit ....................... $ 8.6 $ 7.1
Operating profit margin ................ 30.2% 26.6%margin............................ 25.6% 26.5%
Revenues increased 6.7%$29.2 million to $28.5$82.8 million infor the current quarter.six-month period
ended June 30, 2003. This increase was primarily due to railcar sales and an
increase in rental revenues from additionsdue to growth in the lease fleet. Included in the
results of this group are revenues from the sale of railcars from the lease
fleet of $0.8$26.2 million in the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 and $1.0$1.3 million in
the same period in 2002. Operating profit increased $1.5$7.0 million to $8.6$21.2
million in the current quarter. This increase was
15
primarily due to the additions to the lease fleet, partially offset by an
increase in operating and administrative expenses due to regulatory mandated
repairs and railroad charges. Operating profits on the sale of railcars from
the lease fleet, including recognition of deferred manufacturing profit, were
$0.1$3.2 million for both quarters.the six months ended June 30, 2003 and $0.2 million for the
same period in 2002. Profits also increased due to growth in the lease fleet.
ALL OTHER
Revenues in All Other decreased to $7.3 million in the three months ended
March 31, 2003 from $9.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2002. This
was primarily due to a decline in the
structural tower business. Operating loss was $0.9$3.0 million for the threesix months
ended March 31,June 30, 2003, and $2.9$3.8 million in the same period in 2002. The decrease
in the operating loss was primarily due to the sale of inventory in the
structural tower business.business offset by costs associated with the non-operating
plants
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Net cash provided by operating activities for the threesix months ended March
31,June 30,
2003 increased to $87.6$87.2 million compared to $16.7$53.5 million for the same period in
2002. This was due to the collection of a $47.6$48.5 million tax refund, a
decreasean increase
in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $23.5 million, and an increase in
other liabilities of $14.6 million offset by an increase in inventory and
accounts receivable of $21.1$46.3 million offset byand a net loss in the current period.
Capital expenditures for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2003 were $68.4$121.2 million,
of which $65.5$112.6 million waswere for additions to the lease subsidiary. This
compares to $29.4$66.3 million of capital expenditures for the same period last year,
of which $20.4$54.2 million was for additions to the lease subsidiary. Proceeds from
the sale of property, plant and equipment were $2.5$31.9 million for the threesix months
ended March 31,June 30, 2003 composed primarily of the sale of non-operatingrailcars from the lease
fleet and other assets, compared to $1.5$2.2 million for the same period in 2002.
In June 2002 TILC through a newly formed, wholly owned business trust
entered into a $200 million non-recourse warehouse facility to finance or
refinance railcars acquired or
owned by TILC. Specific railcars and the underlying leases secure the facility.
Advances under the facility may not exceed 75% of the fair market value of the
eligible railcars securing the facility less
any excluded assets as defined by the agreement. Advances
under the facility bear interest at LIBOR plus 1.375% (2.59%(2.695% at March 31,June 30, 2003).
TheTILC extended the facility expiresfrom June 2003 to August 2003 and advances under the
facility, if not renewed, are repayable in six-month increments with the final
payment due December 2004.February
19
2005. At March 31,June 30, 2003, $29.2$32.2 million was available under this facility. The
Company is currently in discussions with long-term lenders to provide permanent
financing for the amount currently outstanding under the facility which is
expected to be completed in September 2003 and to renew the warehouse facility
for future financings or refinancings of railcars acquired or owned by TILC.
In June 2003 the Company issued 600 shares of Series B Redeemable
Convertible Preferred Stock. Each share of Series B preferred stock has an
initial liquidation value of $100,000 per share. The Company can make no assurances that permanent financing willliquidation value, plus
accrued but unpaid dividends, is payable on June 25, 2008, the mandatory
redemption date, at our option in cash or in shares of common stock valued at
90% of the then current market price of our common stock. Each share of Series B
preferred stock may be obtained.
On April 1, 2003, Moody's Investors Service announced that it had placedconverted at any time at the Company's credit rating under review for a possible downgrade. Ifoption of the Company's credit rating is downgraded, it would result in a 1/4% increase in the
Company's interest rateholder into
shares of our common stock, based on the revolving commitment. If further downgrades by
any credit agency wereinitial conversion price of $22.46 per
share, which is equivalent to occur,4,452 shares of common stock for each $100,000
initial liquidation preference. Holders of the interestSeries B preferred stock are
entitled to receive dividends payable semi-annually, on July 1 and January 1 of
each year, beginning January 1, 2004 at an annual rate of 4.5% of the
liquidation preference. We may, at our option, pay dividends either in cash or
in shares of our common stock at the then current market price. The holders of
shares of Series B preferred stock are entitled to vote with the holders of the
common stock on an as-if converted basis on all matters brought before the
Company's credit
facilities would not increase further.stockholders.
We expect to finance future operating requirements with cash flows from
operations and, depending on market conditions, debt and/or privately or
publicly placed equity.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
As of March 31,June 30, 2003 other commercial commitments related to letters of
credit have increased to $114.3$117.5 million from $110.2 million as of December 31,
2002. Other commercial commitments that relate to operating leases under
sales/leaseback transactions were basically unchanged.
RECENT PRONOUNCEMENTS
In June 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 143 "Accounting for Asset
Retirement Obligations: (SFAS 143). SFAS 143 addresses financial accounting and
reporting for obligations associated with the retirement of tangible long-lived
assets and the associated asset retirement costs. It applies to legal
obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets, except for
certain obligations of lessees. SFAS 143 is effective for financial statements
issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Company adopted SFAS
143 on January 1, 2003 and it did not have a material effect on its consolidated
financial statements.
In June 2002, the FASB issued Statement No. 146, "Accounting for Costs
Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities" (SFAS 146). SFAS 146 nullifies
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3 "Liability Recognition for
16
Certain Employee Termination Benefits and other Costs to Exit an Activity
(including Certain Costs Incurred in an Restructuring)." SFAS 146 applies to
costs associated with an exit activity that does not involve an entity newly
acquired in a business combination or with a disposal activity covered by SFAS
144. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated
after December 31, 2002, with earlier application encouraged. The Company
adopted SFAS 146 and while it did not have a material impact on its consolidated
financial statements it will impact the timing of charges, which could impact
the comparability of results among reporting periods.
During January 2003, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 46 "Consolidation
of Variable Interest Entities"Entities (FIN 46). The consolidation requirements of FIN 46
apply immediately to variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003
and apply to existing variable interest entities in the first fiscal year or
interim periods beginning after June 15, 2003. Until now, one company generally
has included another entity in its consolidated financial statements only if it
controlled the entity through voting interests. Interpretation 46 requires a
variable interest entity to be consolidated by a company if that company is
subject to a majority of the risk of loss from the variable interest entity's
activities or entitled to receive a majority of the entity's residual returns or
both. A company that consolidates a variable interest entity is called the
primary beneficiary of that entity. Certain of the disclosure requirements apply
in all financial statementsstatement issued after January 31, 2003, regardless of when the
variable interest entity was established. The Company is evaluating whether or
not itis would be designated the primary beneficiary of the independent trust
which purchases railcars from the Company in a sale/leaseback transaction as
described in Note 7. Currently, the Company believes that it is not the primary
beneficiary and therefore will not be required to consolidate the Trust.
In May 2003, the FASB issued Statement No. 150, "Accounting for Certain
Financial Instruments with Characteristics of both Liabilities and Equity" (SFAS
150). SFAS 150 establishes standards for how a company classifies and measures
in its statement of financial position certain financial instruments with
characteristics of both liabilities and equity. It requires that a company
classify a financial instrument that is within its scope as a liability (or an
asset in some circumstances) because that financial instrument embodies an
obligation of the issuer. SFAS 150 is effective for financial instruments
entered into or modified after May 31, 2003, and otherwise is effective at the
beginning of the first period beginning after June 15, 2003. The Company does
not expect the provisions of this statement to have a significant impact on the
statement of financial position.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS. This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Any statements contained herein that are not
historical facts are forward-looking statements and involve risks and
uncertainties. These forward-looking statements include expectations, beliefs,
plans, objectives, future financial performance, estimates, projections, goals
and forecasts. Potential factors, which could cause our actual results of
operations to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements,
include:
oinclude among others:
- - market conditions and demand for our products;
o- - the cyclical nature of both the railcar and barge industries;
o abnormal periods of inclement- - variations in weather in areas where construction products are sold and used;
o- - the timing of introduction of new products;
o20
- - the timing of customer orders;
o- - price erosion;
ochanges;
- - changes in mix of products sold;
o- - the extent of utilization of manufacturing capacity;
o- - availability and costs of component parts, supplies and raw materials;
o price- - competition and other competitive factors;
o- - changing technologies;
o- - steel prices;
o- - interest rates and capital costs;
o- - funding and renewal of our leasing warehouse facility;
- - taxes;
o- - the stability of the governments and political and business conditions in
certain foreign countries, particularly Mexico and Romania;
o- - changes in import and export quotas and regulations;
o- - business conditions in emerging economies;
- - results of litigation; and
o- - legal, regulatory and environmental issues.
Any forward-looking statement speaks only as of the date on which such
statement is made. Trinity undertakes no obligation to update any
forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on
which such statement is made.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
There has been no material change in our market risks since December 31,
2002.
17
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
The Company maintains controls and procedures designed to ensure that it is
able to collect the information it is required to disclose in the reports it
files with the SEC, and to process, summarize, and disclose this information
within the time periods specified in the rules of the SEC. The Company's Chief
Executive and Chief Financial Officers are responsible for establishing and
maintaining these procedures and, as required by the rules of the SEC, evaluate
their effectiveness. Based on their evaluation of the Company's disclosure
controls and procedures which took place as of a date within 90 daysthe end of the filing date ofperiod covered by
this report, the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers believe that these
procedures are effective to ensure that the Company is able to collect, process
and disclose the information it is required to disclose in the reports it files
with the SEC within the required time periods.
INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Company maintains a system of internal controls designed to provide
reasonable assurance that: transactions are executed in accordance with
management's general or specific authorization; transactions are recorded as
necessary (1) to permit preparation of financial statements in conformity with
generally accepted accounting principals,principles, and (2) to maintain accountability for
assets; access to assets is permitted only in accordance with management's
general or specific authorization; and the recorded accountability for assets is
compared with the existing assets at reasonable intervals and appropriate action
is taken with respect to any differences.
Since the date of the most recent evaluation of the Company's internal
controls by the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officers, there have been no
significant changes in such controls or in other factors that could have
significantly affected those controls, including any corrective actions with
regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
1821
PART II
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, included in the
Inland Barge Group, Trinity Marine
Products, Inc. ("TMP") and certain material suppliers and others, are
co-defendants in fivesix separate lawsuits filed by Florida Marine Transporters,
Inc. ("FMT") on May 15, 2002, J. Russell Flowers, Inc. ("Flowers") on October 7,
2002, ACF Barge Acceptance I, LLC ("ACF") on December 4, 2002, Marquette
Transportation Company and Iowa Fleeting Services, Inc. ("Marquette") on March
7, 2003, and Waxler Transportation Company, Inc. ("Waxler") on April 7, 2003 and
LeBeouf Bros. Towing ("LeBeouf") on July 3, 2003. The FMT, ACF, Marquette,
Waxler and WaxlerLeBeouf cases are pending in the 25th Judicial District Court in
Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana, and the Flowers case is pending in the U.S.
District Court, Northern District of Mississippi in Greenville, Mississippi. In
the Waxler case, the plaintiff has petitioned the court for certification of a
class. If a class, action is
certified by the court,which would increase the total number of barges involved in the
litigation
will increase.litigation. Absent certification of a class in the Waxler case, these fivesix
separate suits involve 2248 tank barges sold at an approximate average price of
$1.5$1.4 million, and 140 hopper barges sold at an approximate average price of
$280,000. Each of the cases set forth allegations pertaining to damages arising
from alleged defects in coating materials supplied by a co-defendant and
workmanship by TMP. The plaintiffs seek both compensatory and punitive damages
and/or recision of the barge purchase contracts. Independent experts
investigating the claims have expressed the opinion that technical arguments
presented by the plaintiffs in the litigation are without merit. Two of the fivesix
plaintiffs owe TMP approximately $10.9$11.2 million, of which $5.2$6.7 million is past
due, related to contracts for barges not involved in the litigation. TMP is in the process of
filinghas
filed suit and a claim for collection of the past due amount.amounts.
In March 2003, a jury awarded $163.7 million to an independent contractor's
employee who died following an accident while working at a Company subsidiary's
aggregate mining operation. The presiding judge in the case has requested the parties mediate pending entry ofentered a final
judgement. The trial
court retains the authority to reduce or vacate the award,judgment of $33.9 million (inclusive of fees, costs and the Company's
subsidiary intends to appeal if necessary. Management believesjudgment interest). It
is expected that the amounts
not covered by insurance in this case will not be material to the Company's
financial position.appealed. The Company believes losses in
excess of $3.0 million are covered by insurance.
The Company is also involved in other claims and lawsuits incidental to its
business. As a matter of course the Company will have settlement discussions
from time to time with various plaintiffs. Based on information currently available, it is management's opinion
that the ultimate outcome of litigatedall current litigation and other claims, through settlement or otherwise,including
settlements, in the aggregate will not have a material adverse effect on the
Company's overall financial condition for purposes of financial reporting.
However, resolution of certain claims or lawsuits by settlement or otherwise
could have a significant impact on the operating results of the reporting period
in which such resolution occurs.
ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
NoneAt the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held May 12, 2003, stockholders
elected eight incumbent directors for a one-year term (Proposal 1) and approved
ratification of Ernst & Young LLP as independent auditors for the year ending
December 31, 2003 (Proposal 2). The vote tabulation follows for each proposal:
Proposal 1 - Election of Directors
Nominee For Withheld
------- --- --------
David W. Biegler 38,580,094 256,723
Craig J. Duchossois 33,867,663 4,969,154
Ronald J. Gafford 38,579,809 257,008
Barry J. Galt 38,570,302 266,515
Clifford J. Grum 38,576,850 259,967
Jess T. Hay 34,419,663 4,417,154
Diana S. Natalicio 38,576,834 259,983
Timothy R. Wallace 38,553,517 283,300
Proposal 2 - Independent Auditors
For Against Abstentions
--- ------- -----------
38,530,706 276,115 29,996
22
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) Exhibits.
Exhibit Number Description
10.11.2 Amendment No. 3 to Deferred Plan for Directors
Fees, dated April 1, 2003. *
99.1-------------- -----------
31.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.X.C., Section 1350,
as adoptedof Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
Section 906302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.231.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification by Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* Management compensatory plan arrangement.
Notice: A copy32.2 Certification by Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18
U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of Exhibits omitted from the reproduction will be
furnished upon written request to Neil Shoop, Treasurer, Trinity
Industries, Inc., P.O. Box 568887, Dallas, Texas 75356-8887. We may
impose a reasonable fee for our expense in connection with providing
the above-referenced Exhibits.
19
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K during the quarter ended June 30, 2003
(1) Trinity filed aA Current Report on Form 8-K dated March 31,was filed on April 2, 2003,
reporting, under
Item 5, press release to clarifyclarifying issues regardingraised under a jury award in Beaumont,
Texas. Pursuant to Form 8-K:
(i) under Item 7, theTexas and attaching a news release dated March 31, 2003.
(2) A Current Report on Form 8-K was filed on May 12, 2003, under
Item 9, reporting operating results for the three months ended
March 31, 2003, and attaching a news release dated May 7, 2003
and script of conference call of May 8, 2003.
(3) A Current Report on Form 8-K was filed.
20filed on June 25, 2003, under
Item 5, reporting a sale of preferred stock and attaching the
Certificate of Designations of Series B Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock of Trinity Industries, Inc; the Purchase
Agreement dated as of June 25, 2003; the opinion of Haynes and
Boone, LLP regarding the legality of the Securities; the
computation of Ratio of Earnings to fixed charges; and the Press
Release dated June 25, 2003.
23
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TRINITY INDUSTRIES, INC. By /s/ JIM S. IVY
Registrant
Jim S. Ivy
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
May 8,August 7, 2003
21
CERTIFICATION
I, Timothy R. Wallace, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, certify
that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trinity
Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state material facts
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in
this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls;
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 8, 2003
/s/ Timothy R. Wallace
Timothy R. Wallace
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
22
CERTIFICATION
I, Jim S. Ivy, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Trinity
Industries, Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state material facts
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances
under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to
the period covered by this quarterly report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial
information included in this quarterly report, fairly presents in all
material respects the financial condition, results of operations and
cash flows of the registrant as of and for the periods presented in
this quarterly report;
4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for
establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and
we have:
a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure
that material information relating to the registrant,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us
by others within those entities, particularly during the
period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure
controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to
the filing date of this quarterly report (the "Evaluation
Date"); and
c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the
effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based
on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;
5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based
on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the
audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons
performing the equivalent function):
a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of
internal controls which could adversely affect the
registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report
financial data and have identified for the registrant's
auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management
or other employees who have a significant role in the
registrant's internal controls;
6. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have indicated in this
quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in
internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation,
including any corrective actions with regard to significant
deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Date: May 8, 2003
s/ Jim S. Ivy
Jim S. Ivy
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
2324
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number Description
-------------- -----------
10.11.2 Amendment No. 3 to Deferred Plan for Directors
Fees, dated April 1, 2003. *
99.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.X.C., Section 1350,
as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.2EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION
- -------------- -----------
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
* Management compensatory plan arrangement.32.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C., Section 1350, as adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
25