1
                                  UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             Washington, D.C. 20549

                                    Form 10-Q

              [X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                For the quarterly period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998

                                       or

              [ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)
                     of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
                  For the transition period from _____ to _____

                         Commission File Number: 1-12058

                BURLINGTON RESOURCES COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUST
             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


            Delaware                                  76-6088828
  (State or other jurisdiction                     (I.R.S. Employer
       of incorporation or                        Identification No.)
          organization)

                                NationsBank, N.A.
                               NationsBank Plaza
                           901 Main Street, Suite 1700
                               Dallas, Texas 75202
                    (Address of principal executive offices)
                                   (Zip code)

                                 (214) 508-2304
              (Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

            Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [x] No [ ]

            Number of units of beneficial interest outstanding at August 1,October 23, 
1998: 8,800,000


   2




                         PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1.     Financial Statements.

            The condensed financial statements included herein have been
prepared by NationsBank, N.A. (as, as successor to NationsBank of Texas, N.A.), as
Trustee (the "Trustee") of Burlington Resources Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust (the
"Trust"), pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in
annual financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such
rules and regulations, although the Trustee believes that the disclosures are
adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The condensed
financial statements of the Trust presented herein are unaudited, except for
balances as of December 31, 1997, and therefore are subject to year-end
adjustments. It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read
in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto in the Trust's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997. The December
31, 1997 balance sheet is derived from the audited balance sheet of that date.
In the opinion of the Trustee, all adjustments necessary to present fairly the
assets, liabilities and trust corpus of the Trust as of JuneSeptember 30, 1998, the
distributable income for the three month and sixnine month periods ended JuneSeptember
30, 1998 and 1997 and the changes in trust corpus for the sixnine month periods
ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and 1997, have been included. The distributable income
for such interim periods is not necessarily indicative of the distributable
income for the full year.

            The condensed financial statements as of JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and for
the three month and sixnine month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and 1997,
included herein, have been reviewed by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent
certified public accountants, as stated in their report appearing herein.


                                        2

   3

                         Independent Accountants' Report


NationsBank, N.A.,
 as Trustee of Burlington Resources
 Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed statement of assets, liabilities and
trust corpus of the Burlington Resources Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust as of
JuneSeptember 30, 1998, and the related condensed statements of distributable income
for the three month and sixnine month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and 1997 and
changes in trust corpus for the sixnine month periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and
1997. These condensed financial statements are the responsibility of the
Trustee.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial
data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting
matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance
with generally accepted auditing standards, the objective of which is the
expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole.
Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

As described in Note 2 to the condensed financial statements, these condensed
financial statements have been prepared on a modified cash basis of accounting,
which is a comprehensive basis of accounting other than generally accepted
accounting principles.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should
be made to such condensed financial statements for them to be in conformity with
the basis of accounting described in Note 2.

We have previously audited, in accordance with generally accepted auditing
standards, the statement of assets, liabilities and trust corpus of Burlington
Resources Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust as of December 31, 1997, and the related
statements of distributable income and changes in trust corpus for the year then
ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 27, 1998, we
expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion,
the information set forth in the accompanying condensed statement of assets,
liabilities and trust corpus as of December 31, 1997, is fairly stated, in all
material respects, in relation to the statement of assets, liabilities and trust
corpus from which it has been derived.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
    Dallas, Texas

August 10,November 6, 1998

                                        3

   4
BURLINGTON RESOURCES COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUST

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS, LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS



JuneSeptember 30, December 31, 1998 1997 ----------- ----------- (unaudited) ASSETS Cash and cash equivalents $ 16,65455,626 $ 50,819 Royalty interests in gas properties (less accumulated amortization of $96,090,795$100,947,315 at JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and $86,861,742 at December 31, 1997) 84,309,20579,452,685 93,538,258 ----------- ----------- TOTAL ASSETS $84,325,859$79,508,311 $93,589,077 =========== =========== LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS Trust expenses payable $ 126,505106,352 $ 104,149 Trust corpus - 8,800,000 units of beneficial interest authorized, issued and outstanding 84,199,35479,401,959 93,484,928 ----------- ----------- TOTAL LIABILITIES AND TRUST CORPUS $84,325,859$79,508,311 $93,589,077 =========== ===========
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. 4 5 BURLINGTON RESOURCES COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUST CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
FOR FOR THE THREE THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MONTHS ENDED JuneSeptember 30, 1998 JuneSeptember 30, 1997 ------------- ------------------------------- ------------------ Royalty income $ 2,028,5022,026,429 $ 1,618,7991,987,036 Interest income 5,750 3,912 ----------- ----------- 2,034,252 1,622,7115,488 5,237 ------------ ------------ 2,031,917 1,992,273 General and administrative expenses (222,080) (222,234) ----------- -----------(122,856) (120,391) ------------ ------------ Distributable income $ 1,812,1721,909,061 $ 1,400,477 =========== ===========1,871,882 ============ ============ Distributable income per unit (8,800,000 units) $ .22 $ .21 $ .16 =========== ======================= ============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. 5 6 BURLINGTON RESOURCES COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUST CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF DISTRIBUTABLE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
FOR FOR THE SIXNINE THE SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED MONTHS ENDED JuneSeptember 30, 1998 JuneSeptember 30, 1997 ------------- ------------------------------- ------------------ Royalty income $ 3,452,8565,479,285 $ 3,090,7195,077,755 Interest income 10,199 7,589 ----------- ----------- 3,463,055 3,098,30815,686 12,826 --------------- --------------- 5,494,971 5,090,581 General and administrative expenses (408,273) (418,520) ----------- -----------(531,129) (538,911) --------------- --------------- Distributable income $ 3,054,7824,963,842 $ 2,679,788 =========== ===========4,551,670 =============== =============== Distributable income per unit (8,800,000 units) $ .35.56 $ .30 =========== ===========.52 =============== ===============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. 6 7 BURLINGTON RESOURCES COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUST CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN TRUST CORPUS (UNAUDITED)
FOR FOR THE SIXNINE THE SIXNINE MONTHS ENDED MONTHS ENDED JuneSeptember 30, 1998 JuneSeptember 30, 1997 ------------- ---------------------------- --------------- Trust corpus, beginning of period $ 93,484,928 $ 107,328,165 Amortization of royalty interest (9,229,053) (8,030,508)(14,085,573) (11,737,658) Distributable income 3,054,781 2,679,7884,963,842 4,551,670 Distributions to unitholders (3,111,302) (2,715,387) ------------- -------------(4,961,238) (4,527,269) --------------- --------------- Trust corpus, end of period $ 84,199,35479,401,959 $ 99,262,058 ============= =============95,614,908 =============== =============== Distributions per unit (8,800,000 units) $ .35.56 $ .31 ============= =============.51 =============== ===============
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. 7 8 BURLINGTON RESOURCES COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUST NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) 1. TRUST ORGANIZATION AND PROVISIONS Burlington Resources Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust (the "Trust") was formed as a Delaware business trust pursuant to the terms of the Trust Agreement of Burlington Resources Coal Seam Gas Royalty Trust (the "Trust Agreement") entered into effective as of May 1, 1993 by and among Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company, a Delaware corporation ("BROG"), as trustor, Burlington Resources Inc., a Delaware corporation ("Burlington Resources"), and NationsBank, N.A. (as successor to NationsBank of Texas, N.A.), a national banking association (the "Trustee"), and Mellon Bank (DE) National Association, a national banking association (the "Delaware Trustee"), as trustees. The trustees are independent financial institutions. Effective January 1, 1996, Meridian Oil Production Inc. ("MOPI") was merged with and into Meridian Oil Inc. ("MOI"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Burlington Resources. Effective July 11, 1996, MOI changed its name to Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company and Meridian Oil Trading Inc. ("MOTI") and Meridian Oil Gathering Inc. ("MOGI"), both affiliates of MOI, changed their names to Burlington Resources Trading Inc. ("BRTI") and Burlington Resources Gathering Inc. ("BRGI"), respectively. Accordingly, with regard to the period prior to the date of such name changes, references in this Form 10-Q to BROG refer to MOPI, references to BRTI refer to MOTI and references to BRGI refer to MOGI. The Trust is a grantor trust formed to acquire and hold certain net profits interests (the "Royalty Interests") in BROG's interest in the Fruitland coal formation underlying the Northeast Blanco Unit in the San Juan Basin of New Mexico (the "Underlying Properties"). The Trust was initially created by the filing of a Certificate of Trust with the Secretary of State of Delaware on May 5, 1993. In accordance with the Trust Agreement, BROG contributed $1,000 as the initial trust corpus of the Trust. On June 17, 1993, the Royalty Interests were conveyed to the Trust by BROG pursuant to the Net Profits Interest Conveyance (the "Conveyance") dated effective as of May 1, 1993, in consideration for all 8,800,000 authorized units of beneficial interest ("Units") in the Trust. BROG transferred its Units by dividend to its parent, Burlington Resources, Inc., which sold such Units to the public at $20.50 per Unit through various underwriters in June 1993 (the "Public Offering") . All of the production attributable to the Underlying Properties is from the Fruitland coal formation and currently constitutes "coal seam" gas that entitles the owners of such production, provided certain requirements are met, to tax credits pursuant to Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Royalty income to the Trust is attributable to the sale of depleting assets. All of the Underlying Properties burdened by the NPI (as hereinafter defined) consist of producing properties. Accordingly, the proved reserves attributable to BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties are expected to decline substantially during the term of the Trust and a portion of each cash distribution made by the Trust will, therefore, be analogous to a return of capital. Accordingly, cash yields attributable to the Units are expected to decline over the term of the Trust. 8 9 The Trustee has all powers to collect and distribute proceeds received by the Trust and to pay Trust liabilities and expenses. The Delaware Trustee has only such powers as are set forth in the Trust Agreement or are required by law and is not empowered to otherwise manage or take part in the business of the Trust. The Royalty Interests are passive in nature and neither the Delaware Trustee nor the Trustee has any control over or any responsibility relating to the operation of the Underlying Properties or BROG's interest therein. The Trust will terminate no later than December 31, 2012, subject to earlier termination under certain circumstances described in the Trust Agreement (the "Termination Date"). Cancellation of the Trust will occur on or following the Termination Date when all Trust assets have been sold and the net proceeds thereof are distributed to the holders of the Units ("Unitholders"). As reported in the Trust's Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 25, 1998 (the "Form 8-K") with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), on September 17, 1998, San Juan Partners L.L.C. and certain affiliated parties including EnCap Energy Capital Fund III, L.P., EnCap Energy Capital Fund III-B, Inc., ECIC Corporation, EnCap Energy Partners, L.P., First Union Investors, Inc., Andover Group, Inc., Charles T. McCord III, O'Sullivan Oil & Gas Company, Inc., Christopher P. Scully, Scott W. Smith Funding, L.L.C., and John V. Whiting (collectively, "San Juan"), filed an Amendment No. 22 (the "San Juan Amendment") to the Schedule 13D filed by San Juan with the SEC on January 20, 1998 with respect to San Juan's ownership of Units. As stated in the San Juan Amendment, San Juan's purpose in acquiring its Units is to pursue the termination of the Trust, resulting in a liquidation of the Trust's assets and a distribution of available proceeds therefrom to the holders of Units ("Unitholders"). Because termination of the Trust requires the affirmative vote in favor of termination by the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding Units, San Juan indicated in the San Juan Amendment that it might seek to obtain the requisite vote by (i) acquiring additional Units or (ii) seeking consents from a limited number of other Unitholders, such that San Juan will own or have the right to vote at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding Units. Since the date of the Amendment, San Juan has acquired through a series of open market transactions additional Units resulting in aggregate holdings, as disclosed in an Amendment No. 25 to San Juan's 13D filed by San Juan with the SEC on October 6, 1998, of 5,867,968 Units, constituting approximately 66.68% of the total number of Units issued and outstanding as of such date. As described in the San Juan Amendment, pursuant to the terms of the Trust Agreement, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1993, and described in the Form 10-K under "Item 1 - Description of the Trust Termination and Liquidation," the Trust may terminate prior to January 1, 2003, only upon the affirmative vote in favor of termination of the trust by the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding Units. Pursuant to the Trust Agreement, a meeting of the Unitholders may be called by the holders of at least 10% of the then outstanding Units. The Trust is required to provide 9 10 Unitholders written notice of any such meeting no less than 20 nor more than 60 days in advance thereof. At such meeting, if the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the Units vote in favor of terminating the Trust, the Trustee will commence the liquidation process, and the Trust will continue until all of the assets of the Trust are liquidated and the Trust's affairs are wound up. On October 29, 1998, the Trustee received written notice from San Juan that San Juan was taking action to call a meeting of Unitholders for the purpose of voting on a proposal by San Juan to terminate the Trust and certain related matters. According to the San Juan Amendment, San Juan intends to vote any and all Units it owns or over which it has voting control in favor of termination of the Trust at such meeting. Assuming San Juan does in fact so vote such Units, the termination and wind up of the Trust pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Trust Agreement will occur. The only assets of the Trust, other than cash and cash equivalents being held for the payment of expenses and liabilities and for distribution to Unitholders, are the Royalty Interests. The Royalty Interests consist primarily of a net profits interest (the "NPI") in BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties. The NPI generally entitles the Trust to receive 95 percent of the NPI Net Proceeds, as defined below. The Royalty Interests also include a 20 percent interest in the Infill Net Proceeds, as defined below, from the sale of production if well spacing rules are effectively modified and additional wells are drilled on producing drilling blocks in the Northeast Blanco Unit ("Infill Wells") during the term of the Trust. With respect to the NPI, the term "NPI Net Proceeds" generally means the aggregate proceeds attributable to BROG's net revenue interest in the Underlying Properties (excluding the proceeds, if any, from Infill Wells) calculated at the price paid by BRTI at any one of four central delivery points in the Northeast Blanco Unit gathering system or either of two wellhead delivery points (collectively, the "Central Gathering Point") for the entitled volume of gas produced and sold from BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties less BROG's working interest share of (i) property, production and related taxes (including severance taxes); (ii) lease operating expenses; (iii) capital costs (if paid after January 1, 1994); (iv) royalties, if any, required to be paid that are based on the value of Section 29 tax credits attributable to such working interest share; and (v) interest on the unrecovered portion, if any, of the foregoing costs at a rate equal to the base rate (compounded quarterly) as announced from time to time by Citibank, N.A. ("Citibank's Base Rate"). The term "Infill Net Proceeds" generally means the aggregate proceeds attributable to BROG's net revenue interest calculated at the price paid by BRTI at the Central Gathering Point for the entitled volume of gas produced and sold from BROG's interest in any Infill Wells less BROG's working interest share of (a) property, production and related taxes (including severance taxes) on such Infill Wells; (b) lease operating expenses with respect to such Infill Wells; (c) capital costs with respect to such Infill Wells; and (d) interest on the unrecovered portion, if any, of the foregoing costs at Citibank's Base Rate. The complete definitions of NPI Net Proceeds and Infill Net Proceeds are set forth in the Conveyance. The definitions, formulas and accounting procedures and other terms governing the computation of the Royalty Interests are set forth in the Conveyance. 10 11 Because of the passive nature of the Trust and the restrictions and limitations on the powers and activities of the Trustee contained in the Trust Agreement, the Trustee does not consider any of the officers and employees of the Trustee to be "officers" or "executive officers" 9 10 of the Trust as such terms are defined under the applicable rules and regulations adopted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. 2. BASIS OF ACCOUNTING The financial statements of the Trust are prepared on a modified cash basis and are not intended to present financial position and results of operations in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Preparation of the Trust's financial statements on such basis includes the following: - - Royalty income and interest income are recorded in the period in which amounts are received by the Trust rather than in the months of production. - - General and administrative expenses recorded are based on liabilities paid and cash reserves established out of cash received. - - Amortization of the Royalty Interests is calculated on a unit-of- productionunit-of-production basis and charged directly to trust corpus when revenues are received. - - Distributions to Unitholders are recorded when declared by the Trustee (see Note 4). The financial statements of the Trust differ from financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP because royalty income is not accrued in the period of production, general and administrative expenses recorded are based on liabilities paid and cash reserves established rather than on an accrual basis, and amortization of the Royalty Interests is not charged against operating results. The net amount of royalty interests in gas properties is limited to the sum of the future net cash flows attributable to the Trust's gas reserves at year end using current unescalated product prices plus the estimated future Section 29 credits for federal income tax purposes. If the net cost of royalty interests in gas properties exceeds this amount,exceed the aggregate of these amounts, an impairment provision will beis recorded and charged to the trust corpus. 10 11 3. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES The Trust is a grantor trust for Federal income tax purposes. As a grantor trust, the Trust will not be required to pay Federal or state income taxes. Accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been made in these condensed financial statements. 11 12 Because the Trust will be treated as a grantor trust, and because a Unitholder will be treated as directly owning an interest in the Royalty Interests, each Unitholder will be taxed directly on his per Unit share of income attributable to the Royalty Interests consistent with the Unitholder's method of accounting and without regard to the taxable year or accounting method employed by the Trust. Production from coal seam gas wells drilled after December 31, 1979 and prior to January 1, 1993, qualifies for the Federal income tax credit for producing nonconventional fuels under Section 29 of the Internal Revenue Code. This tax credit is calculated annually based on each year's qualified production through the year 2002. Such credit, based on the Unitholder's pro rata share of qualifying production, may not reduce his regular tax liability (after the foreign tax credit and certain other non-refundable credits) below his alternative minimum tax. Any part of the Section 29 credit not allowed for the tax year solely because of this limitation is subject to certain carryover provisions. The Trustee is provided Section 29 tax credit information related to Trust Properties by BROG. In 1997, the Tax Court upheld the IRS position that nonconventional fuel such as coal seam gas does not qualify for the Section 29 credit unless the producer received a formal certification from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC). The FERC's certification authority expired effective January 1, 1993. Many producers believe that wells meeting the certification requirements are eligible for the Section 29 credit regardless of FERC certification. However, this position is not in accordance with the IRS position or the decision of the Tax Court. The court decision is on appeal and it is not possible to predict the likely outcome. In the event the appeal is not successful, the ability of the Trust to realize the carrying value of its reserves and the ability of the Unitholders to utilize allocated Section 29 credits could be in question with respect to any uncertificated wells. However, the Trustee has been advised by BROG that certification of the wells producing from the Underlying Properties has been received. Each Unitholder should consult his tax advisor regarding Trust tax compliance matters. 4. DISTRIBUTIONS TO UNITHOLDERS The Trustee determines for each quarter the amount of cash available for distribution to Unitholders. Such amount (the "Quarterly Distribution Amount") is an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the cash received by the Trust, on or before the last business day before the 50th day following the end of each calendar quarter from the Royalty Interests attributable to production during such quarter, plus, with certain exceptions, any other cash receipts of the Trust during such quarter, over the liabilities of the Trust paid during such quarter, subject to adjustments for changes made by the Trustee during such quarter in any cash reserves established for the payment of contingent or future obligations of the Trust. The Quarterly Distribution Amount for each quarter is payable to Unitholders of record 11 12 on the 63rd day following the end of such calendar quarter unless such day is not a business day in which case the record date is the next business day thereafter. The Trustee distributes the Quarterly Distribution Amount on or prior to the 75th day after the end of each calendar quarter 12 13 to each person who was a Unitholder of record on the associated record date, together with interest estimated to be earned on such amount from the date of receipt thereof by the Trustee to the payment date. The Royalty Interests may be sold under certain circumstances and will be sold following termination of the Trust. A special distribution will be made of undistributed net sales proceeds and other amounts received by the Trust aggregating in excess of $10,000,000 (a "Special Distribution Amount"). The record date for a Special Distribution Amount will be the 15th day following receipt of amounts aggregating a Special Distribution Amount by the Trust (unless such day is not a business day in which case the record date will be the next business day thereafter) unless such day is within 10 days prior to the record date for a Quarterly Distribution Amount in which case the record date will be the date as is established for the next Quarterly Distribution Amount. Distribution to Unitholders of a Special Distribution Amount will be made no later than 15 days after the Special Distribution Amount record date. (See Note 1 regarding the discussion of the proposed liquidation of the Trust.) 5. CONTINGENCIES Production attributable to BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties is generally sold pursuant to a gas purchase contract between BROG and BRTI. The gas purchase contract provides certain protections for BRTI in the form of price credits and for Unitholders when the applicable Blanco Hub Spot Price falls below $1.65 per MMBtu and provides certain benefits for BRIT when the Blanco Hub Spot Price exceeds $2.10 per MMBtu. The gas purchase contract also provides that the price paid for gas by BRTI is reduced by the amount of gathering and/or transportation charges, taxes, treating and processing costs and all other costs payable in connection with such services from the central gathering point to main line delivery paid by BRTI. The Blanco Hub Spot Price was above $1.65 per MMBtu during 1997 except for March and April of 1997, and was also above such price throughout the first, second and third quarters of 1998 except for the month of September. The price remained above $1.65 per MMBtu for October 1998. Historically, the Blanco Hub Spot Price has periodically been below $1.65 per MMBtu, however, pursuant to the terms of the gas purchase contract, in those months in which such price was below $1.65 per MMBtu, BRTI continued to purchase gas attributable to BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties at the $1.60 per MMBtu minimum purchase price, less deductible costs paid by BRTI, established by the gas purchase contract; and BRTI received a price credit from BROG for each MMBtu of natural gas so purchased by BRTI equal to the difference between the $1.60 per MMBtu purchase price and the applicable index price (which price is equal to 97 percent of the applicable Blanco Hub Spot Price). With the Blanco Hub Spot Price above $1.65 per MMBtu during April, May and June 1998, royalty income otherwise receivable by the Trust during the third quarter of 1998 was reduced due to partial recoupment of the aggregate price credits. Approximately $632,000 of price credits were recouped by BRTI due to the higher Blanco Hub Spot Prices in April, May and June of 1998. BRTI estimates that as of 13 14 June 30, 1998, BRTI had aggregate price credits of approximately $4.3 million of which the Trust's 95 percent interest was approximately $4.1 million. The entitlement of BRTI to recoup the price credits means that if and when the applicable Blanco Hub Spot Price is above $1.65 per MMBtu, future royalty income paid to the Trust will be reduced until such time as all accrued and unrecouped price credits have been recovered by BRTI. As was the case in the third quarter of 1998, reduced royalty income correspondingly reduces cash distributions to Unitholders. 14 15 Item 2. Trustee's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations The Trust makes quarterly cash distributions to holders of units of beneficial interest ("Units") in the Trust ("Unitholders"). The only assets of the Trust, other than cash and cash equivalents being held for the payment of expenses and liabilities and for distribution to Unitholders, are certain net profits interests (the "Royalty Interests") in certain proved coal seam gas properties located in the Fruitland coal formation underlying the Northeast Blanco Unit in the San Juan Basin of New Mexico (the "Underlying Properties"). The Royalty Interests owned by the Trust burden the net revenue interest in the Underlying Properties that is owned by Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company ("BROG") and not the Trust. Effective January 1, 1996, Meridian Oil Production Inc. ("MOPI") was merged with and into Meridian Oil Inc. ("MOI"), a wholly- ownedwholly-owned subsidiary of Burlington Resources. Effective July 11, 1996, MOI changed its name to Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Company and Meridian Oil Trading Inc. ("MOTI") and Meridian Oil Gathering Inc. ("MOGI"), both affiliates of MOI, changed their names to Burlington Resources Trading Inc. ("BRTI") and Burlington Resources Gathering Inc. ("BRGI"), respectively. Accordingly, with regard to the period prior to the date of such name changes, references in this Form 10-Q to BROG refer to MOPI, references to BRTI refer to MOTI and references to BRGI refer to MOGI. Distributable income of the Trust consists of the excess of royalty income plus interest income over the general and administrative expenses of the Trust. Upon receipt by the Trust, royalty income is invested in short-term investments in accordance with the Trust Agreement (as defined in Note 1 to the condensed financial statements of the Trust appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q ("Note 1")) until its subsequent distribution to Unitholders. 12 13 The amount of distributable income of the Trust for any quarter may differ from the amount of cash available for distribution to Unitholders in such quarter due to differences in the treatment of the expenses of the Trust in the determination of those amounts. The condensed financial statements of the Trust are prepared on a modified cash basis pursuant to which the expenses of the Trust are recognized when paid or reserves are established for them. Consequently, the reported distributable income of the Trust for any quarter is determined by deducting from the income received by the Trust the amount of expenses paid by the Trust during such quarter. The amount of cash available for distribution to Unitholders, however, is determined in accordance with the provisions of the Trust Agreement and reflects the income actually received by the Trust less the amount of expenses actually paid by the Trust and adjustment for changes in reserves for unpaid liabilities. See Note 4 to the condensed financial statements of the Trust appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q for additional information regarding the determination of the amount of cash available for distribution to Unitholders. 15 16 Three Months and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 Compared to Three Months and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997 Royalty income received by the Trust in a given calendar quarter generally consists of 95% of the NPI Net Proceeds (as defined in Note 1) during the preceding calendar quarter. Royalty income for the secondthird quarter of 1998 amounted to $2,028,502$2,026,429 as compared to $1,618,799$1,987,036 for the same quarter in 1997. For the nine months ended September 30, 1998, royalty income received by the Trust amounted to $5,479,285 as compared to $5,077,755 received for the same period in 1997. Gas production related to the royalty income received by the Trust in the secondthird quarter of 1998 was 3.03.2 Bcf compared to 2.62.5 Bcf for the same quarter in 1997. The higher gas production in the secondthird quarter of 1998 as compared to the same period in 1997 is largely the result of improved looped gas gathering systems installedcapital improvements made during 1997 which in 1997. Theturn were slightly offset by the natural decline of production from the coal seam formation. In addition, the increase in royalty income to the Trust in the secondthird quarter of 1998 as compared to the same period in 1997 reflects the aforementioned increase in production although suchand a small increase was partially offset by deductionsin the net price received for the recoupment of price credits as described herein below.gas produced. The average net price for gas after consideration of costs in the secondthird quarter of 1998 was $.96/Mcf$1.08/MMBtu compared to $1.00/Mcf$1.03/MMBtu in the secondthird quarter of 1997. Royalty Income for the six month period ended June 30, 1998 was $3,452,856 compared to $3,090,719 for the same period in 1997. The higher revenue for the six month period ended June 30, 1998 compared to the same period June 30, 1997 is the result of the increased production as discussed above. Costs deducted to determine the net proceeds received include production taxes, which are calculated on gross proceeds, operating costs and certain capital costs. Production tax fluctuations are in correlation to changes in royalty proceeds and operating costs and have remained relatively stable. During the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998, approximately $436,000$370,000 was charged against the gross proceeds of the Trust relating to the installation of low pressure separators, the recavitation of wells and the expansion of the current gas gathering system.other improvements. Capital costs of this nature are allowed under the Conveyance Agreement. Interest income for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 was $5,750$5,488 as compared to $3,912$5,237 for the same quarter in 1997 due to more funds available for investment.1997. Interest income for the six month periodnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 was $10,199$15,686 as compared to $7,589$12,826 for the same period for 1997. These increases are due to increased funds available for investment as a result of increased royalty income as discussed above. General and administrative expenses, which did not vary significantly from the periods presented, are primarily related to administrative services provided to the Trust. The general and administrative expenses during the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 amounted to $222,080$122,856 compared to $222,234$120,391 for the same quarter in 1997. The generalGeneral and 13 14 administrative expenses for the sixnine month period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 were $408,273$531,129 as compared to $418,520$538,911 for the same period for 1997. Distributable income for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 was $1,812,173$1,909,061 or $.22 per Unit compared to $1,871,882 or $.21 per Unit for the third quarter of 1997. Distributable income for the nine month period ended September 30, 1998 was $4,963,842 as compared to $1,400,477 or $.16 per Unit$4,551,670 for the second quarter ofsame period for 1997. The Trust made a distribution on June 12,September 11, 1998 of $.210321$.210220 per Unit to Unitholders of record on June 2,September 1, 1998. Distributable Income for the six month period ended June 30, 1998 was $3,054,782 compared to $2,679,788 for the same period in 1997.16 17 Royalty income to the Trust is attributable to the sale of depleting assets. All of the Underlying Properties burdened by the NPI consist of producing properties. Accordingly, the proved reserves attributable to BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties are expected to decline substantially during the term of the Trust and a portion of each cash distribution made by the Trust will, therefore, be analogous to a return of capital. Accordingly, cash yields attributable to the Units are expected to decline over the term of the Trust. Royalty income received by the Trust in a given calendar quarter will generally reflect the proceeds from the sale of gas produced from the Underlying Properties during the preceding quarter. Accordingly, the royalty income included in distributable income for the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 was based on production volumes and natural gas prices for the period JanuaryApril 1, 1998 through March 31,June 30, 1998 in accordance with the terms of the conveyance of the Royalty Interests to the Trust, as shown in the table below. The production volumes included in the table below are actual net production volumes from BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties, and not for production attributable to the Trust's Royalty Interests.
For the For the Three Months Three Months Ended Ended March 31,June 30, 1998 March 31,June 30, 1997 -------------- --------------------------- ------------- Production (Bcf)(1)............................. 3.197 2.749.................... 3.317 2.603 Production (Trillion Btu)(2).................... 2.836 2.477........... 2.906 2.344 Average Inside FERC Price ($/MMBtu)(3)................................................ $ 1.951.94 $ 2.711.82 BROG Average Entitled Price Received ($/MMBtu)(4).............................. $ 1.08 $ 1.091.14
(1) Billion Cubic Feet of natural gas. (2) Trillion British Thermal Units. (3) The posted index price (Inside FERC) of spot gas delivered to pipelines. (4) Average Inside FERC Price less allowable deductions. Production attributable to BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties is generally sold pursuant to a gas purchase contract between BROG and BRTI. The gas purchase contract 14 15 provides certain protections for BRTI in the form of price credits and for Unitholders when the applicable Blanco Hub Spot Price falls below $1.65 per MMBtu and provides certain benefits for BRTI when the Blanco Hub Spot Price exceeds $2.10 per MMBtu. The gas purchase contract also provides that the price paid for gas by BRTI is reduced by the amount of gathering and/or transportation charges, taxes, treating and processing costs and all other costs payable in connection with such services from the central gathering point to main line delivery paid by BRTI. 17 18 The Blanco Hub Spot Price was above $1.65 per MMBtu during 1997 except for March and April of 1997, and was also above such price throughout the first, second and secondthird quarters of 1998.1998 except for the month of September. The price remained above $1.65 per MMBtu for JulyOctober 1998. Historically, the Blanco Hub Spot Price has periodically been below $1.65 per MMBtu, however, pursuant to the terms of the gas purchase contract, in those months in which such price was below $1.65 per MMBtu, BRTI continued to purchase gas attributable to BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties at the $1.60 per MMBtu minimum purchase price, less deductible costs paid by BRTI, established by the gas purchase contract; and BRTI received a price credit from BROG for each MMBtu of natural gas so purchased by BRTI equal to the difference between the $1.60 per MMBtu purchase price and the applicable index price (which price is equal to 97 percent of the applicable Blanco Hub Spot Price). With the Blanco Hub Spot Price above $1.65 per MMBtu during January, FebruaryApril, May and MarchJune of 1998, royalty income otherwise receivable by the Trust during secondthe third quarter of 1998 was reduced due to partial recoupment of the aggregate price credits. Approximately $611,000$632,000 of price credits were recouped by BRTI due to the higher Blanco Hub Spot Prices in January, FebruaryApril, May and MarchJune of 1998. BRTI estimates that as of June 30, 1998, BRTI had aggregate price credits of approximately $4.3 million of which the Trust's 95 percent interest was approximately $4.1 million. The entitlement of BRTI to recoup the price credits means that if and when the applicable Blanco Hub Spot Price is above $1.65 per MMBtu, future royalty income paid to the Trust will be reduced until such time as all accrued and unrecouped price credits have been recovered by BRTI. As was the case in the secondthird quarter of 1998, reduced royalty income correspondingly reduces cash distributions to Unitholders. The information in this Form 10-Q concerning production and prices relating to BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties is based on information prepared and furnished by BROG to the Trustee. The Trustee has no control over and no responsibility relating to the operation of the Underlying Properties. Year 2000 Many existing computer programs use only two digits to identify a year in the date field. These programs were designed and developed without considering the impact of the upcoming change in the century. If not corrected, many computer applications could fail or create erroneous results by or at the Year 2000. The Year 2000 issue affects virtually all companies and organizations. If a company or organization does not successfully address its Year 2000 issues, it may face material adverse consequences. 15The Trustee has identified the General Ledger/Accounts Payable System as its primary system that is vulnerable to the Year 2000 issue. The Trust selected a system that has been warranted to be Year 2000 compliant and completed the installation of the new system at the beginning of 1998. The cost of the system was approximately $6,000. To date the Trustee has incurred no other costs in connection with its efforts to identify, assess, remediate and test the Trust's systems for Year 2000 compliance. 18 1619 The Trustee is in the process of identifying and assessing other information technology ("IT") systems used in connection with the Trust as well as other systems, for Year 2000 compliance. Non-IT systems are generally more difficult to assess because they often contain embedded technology that may be subject to Year 2000 problems. The total cost of the Trustee's Year 2000 efforts is expected to be approximately $10,000 (including the $6,000 referred to above), all of which will be incurred and paid during the last quarter of 1998 and the first quarter of 1999. Of this amount, the Trustee expects to pay $4,000 for identification and assessment of affected systems. The Trustee has additionally identified those vendors it believes could have an impact on its day-to-day operations if their operations were interrupted as a result of Year 2000 problems. The Trustee has developed a questionnaire regarding the vendor's Year 2000 status. These vendors, consisting primarily of BROG and NationsBank, N.A., will be contacted before January 1, 1999 to determine their Year 2000 status. The Trustee has no reason to believe that its vendors will not be Year 2000 compliant. In the event the Trustee learns that a vendor's system will not be Year 2000 compliant, the Trustee will assess the potential risk and develop contingency plans at that time. The Trust is relianta passive entity with no business operations, and the IT systems employed by the Trustee in connection with its duties on behalf of the performanceTrust are less extensive than the systems employed by many business entities. The Trust has no formal IT budget, and the Trustee does not anticipate making any other significant expenditures relating to the Trustee's IT systems used in connection with Trust during 1998 or 1999. Thus, the expenditures expected to be made in connection with the Year 2000 efforts described above will represent substantially all of the Trustee's IT-related expenditures on behalf of the Trust during 1998 and 1999. These expenses will be expensed within the financial statements of the Trust. Because the royalty interests held by the Trust are fixed, the Trustee is dependent upon the third parties (primarily BROG and third party vendorsNationsBank, N.A.) that hold operating interests with respect thereto for the receipt of Royaltyroyalty income. Thus, if any such third party failed to deliver royalty income, payment of expenses and disbursement of distributablethe Trustee would have available no alternative source for such income. The Trustee believes that the worst case scenario would be the failure by the Trustee and one or more third parties who pay royalties to the Trust to identify or remediate Year 2000 problems on a timely basis, which could cause the Trustee to be unable to make required distributions to Unitholders. Such inability could result in the incurrence by the Trust of interest charges or other liabilities to Unitholders. The Trustee believes that in the event of a failure of any of its internal systems it would be able to replace such systems in a relatively short period of time, relying on internal resources of NationsBank, N.A., which serves as the Trustee, although there can providebe no assurance asthat such replacement would not be costly or that it would be completed without resulting in a significant delay in the distributions to whether BROGUnitholders. With respect to a failure by a third party to deliver royalty income on a timely basis, the Trustee believes that it would have no control over 19 20 the efforts of such third party to correct the problems, and significant delays in the receipt of royalty income could result. The Trust will utilize both internal and external resources to achieve Year 2000 compliance. The Trustee estimates that its identification and assessment activities are approximately 80% complete. It expects that all of its Year 2000 efforts related to the Trust's internal systems will be completed by the end of the first quarter of 1999. However, there can be no guarantee that the Trustee will be able to identify all potential Year 2000 problems or to fully remediate all Year 2000 problems identified on a timely basis. There also can be no assurance that the systems of third party vendors on which the Trust relies will successfully addressbe timely remediated. The failure by the Trustee or any such third party to fully remediate its Year 2000 issue. Any failure by BROG or any of the third party vendors to successfully address the Year 2000 issueproblems on a timely basis could have a material adverse impactaffect on the TrustTrustee's ability to account for and its Unitholders.make timely distribution of the Trust's distributable income. Certain of the statements made above regarding the Trustee's Year 2000 program are forward-looking statements, and there can be no assurance that the Trustee will be able to achieve Year 2000 compliance in the manner and by the dates indicated. Forward-Looking Statements This report on Form 10-Q includes "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements other than statements of historical fact included in this Form 10-Q, including, without limitation, statements contained in this "Trustee's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" regarding the Trust's financial position and industry conditions, are forward-looking statements. Although the Trustee believes that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. Not applicable. 1620 1721 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION Item 5. Other Information. Unit AcquisitionsExpected Unitholder Proposal to Terminate the Trust As reported in the Trust's Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 25, 1998 (the "Form 8-K") with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), on September 17, 1998, San Juan Partners L.L.C. and certain affiliated parties including EnCap Energy Capital Fund III, L.P., EnCap Energy Capital Fund III-B, Inc., ECIC Corporation, EnCap Energy Partners, L.P., First Union Investors, Inc., Andover Group, Inc., Charles T. McCord III, O'Sullivan Oil & Gas Company, Inc., Christopher P. Scully, Scott W. Smith Funding, L.L.C., and John V. Whiting, (collectively "San Juan") filed an Amendment No. 22 (the "San Juan Amendment") to the Schedule 13D filed by Certain Beneficial Owners OnSan Juan with the SEC on January 20, 1998 those certain parties listedwith respect to San Juan's ownership of Units. As previously reported in the Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners table (the "Ownership Table") set forth in Item 12 of the Trust's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year endedending December 31, 1997 (the "1997"Form 10-K") under "Item 12-- Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management" and in the Trust's Quarterly Report on Form 10-K") (such parties, collectively, "San Juan") filed a Schedule 14D-1 with10-Q for the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") in connection withquarter ending March 31, 1998 under "Item 5-- Other Matters", on January 20, 1998, San Juan initiated a tender offer to purchase exactly (and not less than) 5,446,860 of the Units. TheSan Juan failed to receive tender acceptances for the minimum number of Units required by the tender offer, and consequently the tender offer expired pursuantaccording to its terms on February 17, 1998. According to Schedule 13D filings made by San Juan with the Commission, followingFollowing the expiration of itsthe tender offer and through the date of the Amendment, San Juan had acquired through a series of open market and privately negotiated transactions additional Units resulting in aggregate holdings, as disclosed in the San Juan Amendment, as of September 17, 1998, of 5,331,468 Units, constituting approximately 60.58% of the total number of Units issued and outstanding. As stated in the San Juan Amendment, San Juan's purpose in acquiring its Units is to pursue the termination of the Trust, resulting in a liquidation of the Trust's assets and a distribution of available proceeds therefrom to the holders of Units ("Unitholders"). Because, as described below, termination of the Trust requires the affirmative vote in favor of termination by the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding Units, San Juan indicated in the San Juan Amendment that it might seek to obtain the requisite vote by (i) acquiring additional Units or (ii) seeking consents from a limited number of other Unitholders, such that San Juan will own or have the right to vote at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding Units. Since the date of the Amendment, San Juan has acquired through a series of open market transactions additional Units resulting in totalaggregate holdings, as of July 10, 1998, of 5,331,468 Units, representing approximately 60.58% of all outstanding Units. Accordingdisclosed in an Amendment No. 25 to the Offer to PurchaseSan Juan's 13D filed by San Juan with the SEC on October 6, 1998, of 5,867,968 Units, constituting approximately 66.68% of the total number of Units issued and outstanding as an exhibitof such date. 21 22 As described in the San Juan Amendment, pursuant to its Schedule 14D-1,the terms of the Trust Agreement, filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1993, and described in the Form 10-K under "Item 1 -- Description of the Trust Termination and Liquidation", the Trust may terminate prior to January 1, 2003, only upon the affirmative vote in favor of termination of the trust by the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the outstanding Units. Pursuant to the Trust Agreement, a meeting of the Unitholders may be called by the holders of at least 10% of the then outstanding Units. The Trust is required to provide Unitholders written notice of any such meeting no less than 20 nor more than 60 days in advance thereof. At such meeting, if the holders of at least 66 2/3% of the Units vote in favor of terminating the Trust, the Trustee will commence the liquidation process, and the Trust will continue until all of the assets of the Trust are liquidated and the Trust's affairs are wound up. On October 29, 1998, the Trustee received written notice from San Juan that San Juan was taking action to call a meeting of Unitholders for the purpose of voting on a proposal by San Juan's tender offer was to acquire 67% of the outstanding Units so that it could affect a voteJuan to terminate the Trust causingand certain related matters. According to the San Juan Amendment, San Juan intends to vote any and all Units it owns or over which it has voting control in favor of termination of the Trust at such meeting. Assuming San Juan does in fact so vote such Units, the termination and wind up of the Trust pursuant to the terms and provisions of the Trust Agreement will occur. Also as described in the Form 8-K, the San Juan Amendment states that a letter of intent (the "Letter of Intent") was entered into on September 17, 1998, by and among San Juan and BROG. As described in the Amendment, the Letter of Intent contemplates the entry by San Juan and BROG into a definitive agreement whereby San Juan would purchase from BROG (i) certain interests of BROG in and to the Fruitland coal formation in the Northeast Blanco Hub Unit, including, without limitation, certain interests in leases covering lands burdened by the Trust's Net Profits Interest (as defined in the Form 10-K) to the Trust (the "Trust Interest"), (ii) certain other interests in other leases covering lands in the Northeast Blanco Hub Unit (the "Non-Trust Interest") and (iii) associated rights and obligations of BROG and its affiliates in the Trust, including all of Burlington Resources duties, obligations and rights under and pursuant to the Trust Agreement. Among the rights under the Trust Agreement which would be assigned to San Juan pursuant to the Letter of Intent are BROG's preferential rights to purchase the remaining Royalty Interests in the event of the termination and liquidation of the Trust, including the right to submit an initial bid on the Trust assets to the Trustee and the right to either match or top the highest bid received for the Trust assets in the liquidation process. These rights are set forth in Sections 9.03(c) and (e) of the Trust Agreement and described in the Form 10-K under "Item 1 -- Description of the Trust Termination and Liquidation." According to the San Juan Amendment, the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Letter of Intent will occur only after the termination of the Trust pursuant to an affirmative vote of Unitholders satisfying the requirements of Sections 9.02 and 9.03 of the Trust Agreement, and is subject to various other conditions. As disclosed by an Amendment No. 26 to San Juan's 13D dated October 21, 1998, on such date San Juan and BROG entered into a definitive Purchase and Sale Agreement of substantially the terms and effect as contemplated by the letter of intent. 22 23 In connection with San Juan's proposal to terminate the Trust, the Trust engaged Netherland Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum engineers, to prepare updated reports on the Trust's assetsestimated reserves and a resulting distributionestimated future revenues and on the Trusts estimated Section 29 tax credits attributable to Unitholders.the Royalty Interests. These reports are included as Exhibit 99.1 and Exhibit 99.2, respectively, to this Form 10-Q. The cost of preparing such reports was borne by San Juan and not the Trust. Unitholders are advised to consult the 1997 Form 10-K, particularly "Item 1--Description of8-K and the Trust--Terminationabove referenced filings by San Juan and Liquidation"the exhibits thereto for additional information in this regard. Merger of Trustee Effective May 6, 1998, NationsBank of Texas, N.A., of Dallas, Texas, merged with NationsBank, N.A., of Charlotte, North Carolina. NationsBank, N.A., as survivor ofregarding the merger, has assumed by operation of law all rights, properties and interests of NationsBank of Texas, N.A., including all rights and interests as trustee, executor or administrator or in other fiduciary capacities, in the same manner and to the same extent as such rights, properties and interests were held by NationsBank of Texas, N.A. at the time of the merger. In accordance with applicable law and the provisions of the Trust Agreement, NationsBank, N.A., as successor to NationsBank of Texas, N.A., now serves as Trustee of the Trust. NationsBank, N.A. is performing such functions through its Dallas, Texas, branch office, which is the former principal office of NationsBank of Texas, N.A.foregoing. Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K. (a) Exhibit No. Description ----------- -----------23 Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. 27 Financial Data Schedule 99.1 Reserve Report, dated November 9, 1998, on the estimated reserves, estimated future net revenues and discounted future net revenues attributable to the Royalty Interests and BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties as of August 31, 1998, prepared by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum engineers. 99.2 Report, dated November 10, 1998, on the estimated Section 29 Tax credits attributable to the Royalty Interests as of August 31, 1998, prepared by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum engineers. (b) Reports on Form 8-K. No reportsThe Trust filed a report on Form 8-K were filed duringwith the quarter for whichSecurities and Exchange Commission on September 25, 1998. The items reported in the Form 8-K are described under "Item 5 -- Other Information -- Expected Unitholder Proposal to Terminate the Trust" in this report is filed. 17Form 10-Q. 23 1824 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. BURLINGTON RESOURCES COAL SEAM GAS ROYALTY TRUST By: NationsBank,NATIONSBANK, N.A., Trustee By: /s/ Ron Hooper --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Ron Hooper Vice President Date: August 12,November 16, 1998 (The Trust has no directors or executive officers.) 1824 1925 INDEX TO EXHIBITS
EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION - -------Exhibit No. Description ----------- ----------- 23 Consent of Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc. 27 Financial Data Schedule 99.1 Reserve Report, dated November 9, 1998, on the estimated reserves, estimated future net revenues and discounted future net revenues attributable to the Royalty Interests and BROG's interest in the Underlying Properties as of August 31, 1998, prepared by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum engineers. 99.2 Report, dated November 10, 1998, on the estimated Section 29 Tax credits attributable to the Royalty Interests as of August 31, 1998, prepared by Netherland, Sewell & Associates, Inc., independent petroleum engineers.