UNITED STATES
                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                                    FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

[x][X]  QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
     ACT OF 1934

                  FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2006

                                       OR

[ ]  TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
     EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

                         COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 1-11848

                   REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED
             (EXACT NAME OF REGISTRANT AS SPECIFIED IN ITS CHARTER)

                                                       
             MISSOURI                                           43-1627032
   (STATE OR OTHER JURISDICTION                                (IRS EMPLOYER
OF INCORPORATION OR ORGANIZATION)                         IDENTIFICATION NUMBER)
1370 TIMBERLAKE MANOR PARKWAY CHESTERFIELD, MISSOURI 63017 (ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES) (636) 736-7439 (REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER, INCLUDING AREA CODE) INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT (1) HAS FILED ALL REPORTS REQUIRED TO BE FILED BY SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 DURING THE PRECEDING 12 MONTHS (OR FOR SUCH SHORTER PERIOD THAT THE REGISTRANT WAS REQUIRED TO FILE SUCH REPORTS), AND (2) HAS BEEN SUBJECT TO SUCH FILING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PAST 90 DAYS. YES X NO --- --- INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A LARGE ACCELERATED FILER, AN ACCELERATED FILER, OR A NON-ACCELERATED FILER. LARGE ACCELERATED FILER X ACCELERATED FILER NON-ACCELERATED FILER --- --- --- INDICATE BY CHECK MARK WHETHER THE REGISTRANT IS A SHELL COMPANY (AS DEFINED IN RULE 12B-212b-2 OF THE EXCHANGE ACT). YES NO X --- --- COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING ($.01 PAR VALUE) AS OF APRIL 30,JULY 31, 2006: 61,181,34961,223,901 SHARES. REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES TABLE OF CONTENTS
ITEM PAGE - ---- ---- PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION 1 Financial Statements Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) March 31,June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 3 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited) Three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2006 and 2005 4 Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) ThreeSix months ended March 31,June 30, 2006 and 2005 5 Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) 6 2 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 1112 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 2932 4 Controls and Procedures 2932 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION 1 Legal Proceedings 2933 1A Risk Factors 3033 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 3033 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 33 6 Exhibits 3033 Signatures 3134 Index to Exhibits 3235
2 REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
March 31,June 30, December 31, 2006 2005 ----------- ------------ (Dollars in thousands) ASSETS Fixed maturity securities: $ 6,781,908 $ 6,874,243 Available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost of $6,417,481$6,760,170 and $6,331,225 at March 31,June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively) $ 6,949,932 $ 6,874,243 Mortgage loans on real estate 669,368650,477 648,067 Policy loans 973,625982,199 987,442 Funds withheld at interest 3,612,1933,767,898 3,459,943 Short-term investments 44,54827,421 126,296 Other invested assets 195,5801,056,668 235,464 ----------- ----------- Total investments 12,277,22213,434,595 12,331,455 Cash and cash equivalents 430,740279,020 128,692 Accrued investment income 78,56081,367 62,498 Premiums receivable and other reinsurance balances 594,981687,291 573,145 Reinsurance ceded receivables 534,523555,336 541,944 Deferred policy acquisition costs 2,549,5532,674,888 2,465,630 Other assets 98,350104,170 90,502 ----------- ----------- Total assets $16,563,929$17,816,667 $16,193,866 =========== =========== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Future policy benefits $ 4,784,4245,040,664 $ 4,693,454 Interest sensitive contract liabilities 5,674,5545,806,953 5,503,528 Other policy claims and benefits 1,544,5001,665,071 1,529,298 Other reinsurance balances 231,532214,753 212,422 Deferred income taxes 630,515567,325 652,024 Other liabilities 255,265344,721 117,101 Short-term debt 100,00027,726 125,610 Long-term debt 699,683674,536 674,392 Collateral finance facility 850,272 -- Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust holding solely junior subordinated debentures of the Company 158,589158,625 158,553 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities 14,079,06215,350,646 13,666,382 Commitments and contingent liabilities (See Note 5) Stockholders' Equity: Preferred stock (par value $.01 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding) -- -- Common stock (par value $.01 per share; 140,000,000 shares authorized; 63,128,273 shares issued at March 31,June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005) 631 631 Warrants 66,915 66,915 Additional paid-in-capital 1,059,9671,064,125 1,053,814 Retained earnings 1,111,7851,169,910 1,048,215 Accumulated other comprehensive income: Accumulated currency translation adjustment, net of income taxes 83,090117,846 85,127 Unrealized appreciation of securities, net of income taxes 247,185130,936 361,815 ----------- ----------- Total stockholders' equity before treasury stock 2,569,5732,550,363 2,616,517 Less treasury shares held of 1,948,9361,940,109 and 2,052,316 at cost at March 31,June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively (84,706)(84,342) (89,033) ----------- ----------- Total stockholders' equity 2,484,8672,466,021 2,527,484 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $16,563,929$17,816,667 $16,193,866 =========== ===========
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited). 3 REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
Three months ended March 31, ----------------------------Six months ended June 30, June 30, ----------------------- ----------------------- 2006 2005 2006 2005 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (Dollars in thousands, except per share data) REVENUES: Net premiums $1,076,603 $ 992,442 $ 901,820931,354 $2,069,045 $1,833,174 Investment income, net of related expenses 186,941 157,053168,605 146,284 355,546 303,337 Investment related gains (losses), net 632 3,979(5,314) 12,950 (4,682) 16,929 Change in value of embedded derivatives 4,552 22,561(11,075) (19,917) (6,523) 2,644 Other revenues 14,530 10,80313,717 20,661 28,247 31,464 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total revenues 1,199,097 1,096,2161,242,536 1,091,332 2,441,633 2,187,548 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 811,513 738,053874,531 827,930 1,686,044 1,565,983 Interest credited 61,529 55,05344,732 38,615 106,261 93,668 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 151,804 143,976172,700 157,855 324,504 301,831 Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives 2,757 15,708(7,982) (13,604) (5,225) 2,104 Other operating expenses 46,527 33,00645,830 38,032 92,357 71,038 Interest expense 16,767 9,88515,014 9,895 31,781 19,780 Collateral finance facility expense 277 -- 277 -- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total benefits and expenses 1,090,897 995,6811,145,102 1,058,723 2,235,999 2,054,404 Income from continuing operations before income taxes 108,200 100,53597,434 32,609 205,634 133,144 Provision for income taxes 37,620 33,27133,645 7,449 71,265 40,720 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Income from continuing operations 70,580 67,26463,789 25,160 134,369 92,424 Discontinued operations: Loss from discontinued accident and health operations, net of income taxes (1,510) (707)(158) (3,343) (1,668) (4,050) ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income $ 69,07063,631 $ 66,55721,817 $ 132,701 $ 88,374 ========== ========== ========== ========== BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE: Income from continuing operations $ 1.151.04 $ 1.080.40 $ 2.20 $ 1.48 Discontinued operations (0.02) (0.02)0.00 (0.05) (0.03) (0.07) ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income $ 1.131.04 $ 1.060.35 $ 2.17 $ 1.41 ========== ========== ========== ========== DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE: Income from continuing operations $ 1.131.02 $ 1.050.39 $ 2.14 $ 1.45 Discontinued operations (0.03) (0.01) (0.05) (0.02) (0.06) ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Net income $ 1.101.01 $ 1.040.34 $ 2.12 $ 1.39 ========== ========== ========== ========== DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE $ 0.09 $ 0.09 $ 0.18 $ 0.18 ========== ========== ========== ==========
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited). 4 REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
ThreeSix months ended March 31, ----------------------June 30, ----------------------- 2006 2005 -------------------- --------- (Dollars in thousands) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net income $ 69,070132,701 $ 66,55788,374 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Change in: Accrued investment income (16,109) (18,160)(18,680) (22,584) Premiums receivable and other reinsurance balances (19,127) (20,258)(91,410) (72,993) Deferred policy acquisition costs (79,007) (60,503)(152,112) (156,899) Reinsurance ceded balances 7,421 (7,740)(13,392) (40,535) Future policy benefits, other policy claims and benefits, and other reinsurance balances 137,557 229,280384,937 447,292 Deferred income taxes 37,173 39,77226,061 95,349 Other assets and other liabilities, net 19,157 (39,828)58,886 (103,834) Amortization of net investment discounts and other (11,888) (5,256)(26,624) (16,275) Investment related gains,losses (gains), net (632) (3,982)4,682 (16,929) Other, net 8,435 1,148 ---------2,870 1,919 ----------- --------- Net cash provided by operating activities 152,050 181,030307,919 202,885 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Sales of fixed maturity securities - available for sale 505,016 376,380879,617 816,369 Maturities of fixed maturity securities - available for sale 25,200 18,983133,734 72,295 Purchases of fixed maturity securities - available for sale (610,412) (563,294)(1,273,922) (961,349) Cash invested in mortgage loans on real estate (34,364) (9,555)(46,189) (28,496) Cash invested in policy loans (8,579) (8,294) Cash invested in funds withheld at interest (9,103) (28,546)(29,765) (35,831) Principal payments on mortgage loans on real estate 12,874 5,14243,575 9,719 Principal payments on policy loans 13,822 --12,541 Change in short-term investments and other invested assets 117,960 (9,879) ---------(725,033) (23,042) ----------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in)used in investing activities 20,993 (210,769)(1,012,740) (146,088) CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Dividends to stockholders (5,500) (5,627) Purchases of treasury stock (194)(11,007) (11,262) Principal payments on debt (100,000) -- Exercise of stock options, 2,871 4,339net 2,933 4,913 Net proceeds from collateral finance facility 837,500 -- Net increase in securitized lending activities 108,400 28,45476,508 6,309 Excess deposits (payments) on universal life and other investment type policies and contracts 24,429 (12,918) ---------49,831 (47,402) ----------- --------- Net cash provided by financing activities 130,006 14,248855,765 (47,442) Effect of exchange rate changes (1,001) (1,582) ---------(616) (2,339) ----------- --------- Change in cash and cash equivalents 302,048 (17,073)150,328 7,016 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period 128,692 152,095 -------------------- --------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of period $ 430,740279,020 $ 135,022 =========159,111 =========== ========= Supplementary information: Cash paid for interest $ 4,56833,334 $ 4,19219,256 Cash paid (received) for income taxes, net of refunds $ (21,724)(12,931) $ 52,89477,805
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements (unaudited). 5 REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated ("RGA") and its subsidiaries (collectively, the "Company") have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the three-monthsix-month period ended March 31,June 30, 2006 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2006. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's 2005 Annual Report on Form 10-K ("2005 Annual Report") filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 27, 2006. The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company has reclassified the presentation of certain prior-period information, including all segment information, to conform to the 2006 presentation. 2. EARNINGS PER SHARE The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share on income from continuing operations (in thousands, except per share information):
THREE MONTHS ENDED --------------------- MARCH 31, MARCH 31,SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, JUNE 30, ------------------ ------------------ 2006 2005 --------- ---------2006 2005 ------- ------- -------- ------- Earnings: Income from continuing operations (numerator for basic and diluted calculations) $70,580 $67,264$63,789 $25,160 $134,369 $92,424 Shares: Weighted average outstanding shares (denominator for basic calculation) 61,138 62,55361,185 62,628 61,162 62,591 Equivalent shares from outstanding stock options 1,479 1,3011,524 1,136 1,501 1,215 ------- ------- -------- ------- Denominator for diluted calculation 62,617 63,85462,709 63,764 62,663 63,806 Earnings per share: Basic $ 1.151.04 $ 1.080.40 $ 2.20 $ 1.48 Diluted $ 1.131.02 $ 1.05 ------- -------0.39 $ 2.14 $ 1.45 ======= ======= ======== =======
The calculation of common equivalent shares does not include the impact of options or warrants having a strike or conversion price that exceeds the average stock price for the earnings period, as the result would be antidilutive. The calculation of common equivalent shares also excludes the impact of outstanding performance contingent shares, as the conditions necessary for their issuance have not been satisfied as of the end of the reporting period. For the three and six month periodperiods ended March 31,June 30, 2006, approximately 0.6 million stock options and 0.4 million performance contingent shares were excluded from the calculation. For the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2005, approximately 0.3 million stock options and 0.3 million performance contingent shares were excluded from the calculation. 6 3. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME The following schedule reflects the change in accumulated other comprehensive income (dollars in thousands):
THREE MONTHS ENDED --------------------- MARCH 31, MARCH 31,SIX MONTHS ENDED ----------------------------- ----------------------------- JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 --------- ---------JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- Net income $ 69,07063,631 $ 66,55721,817 $ 132,701 $ 88,374 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(expense), net of income tax: Unrealized gains (losses), net of reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income (114,630) (33,850)(116,249) 178,605 (230,879) 144,755 Foreign currency items (2,037) (8,399)34,756 (19,899) 32,719 (28,298) --------- -------- --------- -------- Comprehensive income (loss) $ (47,597)(17,862) $180,523 $ 24,308(65,459) $204,831 ========= ======== ========= ========
4. SEGMENT INFORMATION The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements accompanying the 2005 Annual Report. The Company measures segment performance primarily based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes. There are no intersegment reinsurance transactions and the Company does not have any material long-lived assets other than internally developed software. As of March 31,June 30, 2006, the carrying value of material internally developed software was approximately $16.4$16.1 million. Investment income is allocated to the segments based upon average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes. Effective January 1, 2006 the Company changed its method of allocating capital to its segments from a method based upon regulatory capital requirements to one based on underlying economic capital levels. The economic capital model is an internally developed risk capital model, the purpose of which is to measure the risk in the business and to provide a basis upon which capital is deployed. The economic capital model considers the unique and specific nature of the risks inherent in RGA's businesses. This is in contrast to the standardized regulatory risk based capital formula, which is not as refined in its risk calculations with respect to each of the Company's businesses. As a result of the economic capital allocation process, a portion of investment income and investment related gains (losses) is credited to the segments based on the level of allocated equity. In addition, the segments are charged for excess capital utilized above the allocated economic capital basis. This charge is included in policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses. The prior period segment results have been adjusted to conform to the new allocation methodology. Information related to total revenues, income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, and total assets of the Company for each reportable segment are summarized below (dollars in thousands).
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING TOTAL REVENUES OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, THREESIX MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, ---------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 ---------- ---------- -------- --------------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- U.S.TOTAL REVENUES U.S $ 765,552782,387 $ 721,362 $ 80,336 $ 68,496668,629 $1,547,939 $1,389,991 Canada 119,508 96,962 8,431 15,662126,230 100,912 245,738 197,874 Europe & South Africa 148,668 144,001 14,797 14,513149,587 135,363 298,255 279,364 Asia Pacific 147,634 122,714 6,614 2,910177,163 152,523 324,797 275,237 Corporate and& Other 17,735 11,177 (1,978) (1,046)7,169 33,905 24,904 45,082 ---------- ---------- -------- ------------------ ---------- Total $1,199,097 $1,096,216 $108,200 $100,535$1,242,536 $1,091,332 $2,441,633 $2,187,548 ========== ========== ======== ================== ==========
7
THREE MONTHS ENDED SIX MONTHS ENDED ----------------------------- ----------------------------- JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES U.S. $70,935 $27,262 $151,271 $ 95,758 Canada 11,074 10,797 19,505 26,459 Europe & South Africa 17,269 (6,844) 32,066 7,669 Asia Pacific 7,725 11,376 14,339 14,286 Corporate & Other (9,569) (9,982) (11,547) (11,028) ------- ------- -------- -------- Total $97,434 $32,609 $205,634 $133,144 ======= ======= ======== ========
TOTAL ASSETS -------------------------- MARCH 31,JUNE 30, DECEMBER 31, 2006 2005 ----------- ------------ U.S. $11,243,109$11,539,289 $11,049,424 Canada 1,987,2772,087,110 1,954,612 Europe & South Africa 999,4371,098,996 956,453 Asia Pacific 894,580919,901 873,230 Corporate and Other 1,439,5262,171,371 1,360,147 ----------- ----------- Total $16,563,929$17,816,667 $16,193,866 =========== ===========
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENT LIABILITIES The Company has commitments to fund investments in limited partnerships in the amount of $29.4$46.6 million at March 31,June 30, 2006. The Company anticipates that the majority of these amounts will be invested over the next five years, however, contractually these commitments could become due at the request of the counterparties. Investments in limited partnerships are carried at cost and are included in other invested assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company is currently a party to three arbitrations that involve its discontinued accident and health business, including personal accident business (which includes London market excess of loss business) and workers' compensation carve-out business. The Company is also party to one pending and one threatened arbitration related to its life reinsurance business. In addition, the Company has been joined in a suit filed against one of its ceding companies alleging wrongful denial of a life insurance claim. As of March 31,June 30, 2006, the parties involved in these actions have raised claims, or established reserves that may result in claims, in the amount of $32.0 million, which is $27.6$27.9 million in excess of the amounts held in reserve by the Company. The Company generally has little information regarding any reserves established by the ceding companies, and must rely on management estimates to establish policy claim liabilities. It is possible that any such reserves could be increased in the future. The Company believes it has substantial defenses upon which to contest these claims, including but not limited to misrepresentation and breach of contract by direct and indirect ceding companies. See Note 20, "Discontinued Operations" in the Company's consolidated financial statements accompanying the 2005 Annual Report for more information. Additionally, from time to time, the Company is subject to litigation related to employment-related matters in the normal course of its business. While it is difficult to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of the pending litigation or arbitrations or provide useful ranges of potential losses, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that their outcomes, after consideration of the provisions made in the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements, would not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position. However, it is possible that an adverse outcome could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated net income or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods. The Company has obtained letters of credit, issued by banks, in favor of various affiliated and unaffiliated insurance companies from which the Company assumes business. These letters of credit represent guarantees of performance under the reinsurance agreements and allow ceding companies to take statutory reserve credits. At March 31,June 30, 2006 8 and December 31, 2005, there were approximately $15.4$14.6 million and $17.4 million, respectively, of outstanding bank letters of credit in favor of third parties. Additionally, the Company utilizes letters of credit to secure reserve credits when it retrocedes business to its offshore subsidiaries, including RGA Americas Reinsurance Company, Ltd., RGA Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Ltd. and RGA Worldwide Reinsurance Company, Ltd. The Company cedes business to its offshore affiliates to help reduce the amount of regulatory capital required in certain jurisdictions, such as the U.S. and the United Kingdom. The capital required to support the business in the offshore affiliates reflects more realistic expectations than the original jurisdiction of the business, where capital requirements are often considered to be quite conservative. As of March 31,June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, $395.5$401.7 million and $439.8 million, respectively, in letters of credit from various banks were outstanding between the various subsidiaries of the Company. Applicable letter of credit fees and fees payable for the credit facility depend upon the Company's senior unsecured long-term debt rating. Fees associated with the Company's other letters of 8 credit are not fixed for periods in excess of one year and are based on the Company's ratings and the general availability of these instruments in the marketplace. RGA has issued guarantees to third parties on behalf of its subsidiaries' performance for the payment of amounts due under certain credit facilities, reinsurance treaties and an office lease obligation, whereby if a subsidiary fails to meet an obligation, RGA or one of its other subsidiaries will make a payment to fulfill the obligation. In limited circumstances, treaty guarantees are granted to ceding companies in order to provide them additional security, particularly in cases where RGA's subsidiary is relatively new, unrated, or not of a significant size relative to the ceding company. Liabilities supported by the treaty guarantees, before consideration for any legally offsetting amounts due from the guaranteed party, totaled $239.6$252.7 million and $256.2 million as of March 31,June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively, and are reflected on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets in future policy benefits. Potential guaranteed amounts of future payments will vary depending on production levels and underwriting results. Guarantees related to trust preferred securities and credit facilities provide additional security to third party banks should a subsidiary fail to make principal and/or interest payments when due. As of March 31,June 30, 2006, RGA's exposure related to these guarantees was $183.7$184.6 million. In addition, the Company indemnifies its directors and officers as provided in its charters and by-laws. Since this indemnity generally is not subject to limitation with respect to duration or amount, the Company does not believe that it is possible to determine the maximum potential amount due under this indemnity in the future. 6. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS The components of net periodic benefit costs were as follows (dollars in thousands):
Three months ended March 31, --------------------------------- Pension Benefits Other Benefits ---------------- --------------FOR THE THREE MONTHS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, ENDED JUNE 30, -------------------- ------------------ 2006 2005 2006 2005 ----- ----- ---- ---------- ------ (in thousands) DETERMINATION OF NET PERIODIC PENSION BENEFIT COST: Service cost $ 614423 $ 548 $179 $103475 $1,037 $1,023 Interest cost 477 382 156 99371 412 848 794 Expected rate of return on plan assets (347) (300)(411) (278) (758) (578) Amortization of prior service cost 6 6 15 15 Amortization of prior actuarial loss 78 137 184 177 ----- ----- ------ ------ Net periodic pension benefit cost $ 467 $ 752 $1,326 $1,431 ===== ===== ====== ====== NET PERIODIC OTHER BENEFITS COST: Service cost $ 180 $ 102 $ 359 $ 205 Interest cost 155 99 311 198 Expected return on plan assets -- -- -- -- Amortization of prior service cost 9 9-- -- -- -- Amortization of prior actuarial loss 106 40 66 1718 132 35 ----- ----- ---- ---------- ------ Net periodic benefitother benefits cost $ 859401 $ 679 $401 $219219 $ 802 $ 438 ===== ===== ==== ========== ======
9 The Company made no$3.8 million in pension contributions during the firstsecond quarter of 2006 and expects this to make second quarterbe the only contribution for the year. 7. COLLATERAL FINANCE FACILITY On June 28, 2006, contributions of $4.6 million. 7. FINANCING ACTIVITIES On March 3, 2006, RGA Australian Holdings PTY, LimitedRGA's subsidiary, Timberlake Financial, L.L.C. ("Australian Holdings"Timberlake Financial"), issued $850.0 million of Series A Floating Rate Insured Notes due June 2036 in a wholly-owned subsidiaryprivate placement. The notes were issued to fund the collateral requirements for statutory reserves required by the U.S. valuation of Life Policies Model Regulation (commonly referred to as Regulation XXX) on specified term life insurance policies reinsured by RGA Reinsurance Company. Proceeds from the notes have been deposited into a series of trust accounts that collateralize the notes and are not available to satisfy the general obligations of the Company, entered into a five-year credit agreement with a capacity of Australian $50.0 million (approximately $35.8 million).Company. Interest on borrowings is based on Australian Bank Bill short term ratesthe notes will accrue at an annual rate of 1-month LIBOR plus a base rate margin.margin, payable monthly. The base rate marginpayment of interest and fees payableprincipal on the notes is insured through a financial guaranty insurance policy with a third party. The notes represent senior, secured indebtedness of Timberlake Financial and its assets with no recourse to RGA or its other subsidiaries. Timberlake Financial will rely primarily upon the receipt of interest and principal payments on a surplus note and dividend payments from its wholly-owned subsidiary, Timberlake Reinsurance Company II ("Timberlake Re"), a South Carolina captive insurance company, to make payments of interest and principal on the notes. The ability of Timberlake Re to make interest and principal payments on the surplus note and dividend payments to Timberlake Financial is contingent upon South Carolina regulatory approval and the performance of specified term life insurance policies with guaranteed level premiums retroceded by RGA's subsidiary, RGA Reinsurance Company, to Timberlake Re. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 46(r), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities - An Interpretation of ARB No. 51," Timberlake Financial is considered to be a variable interest entity and the Company is deemed to hold the primary beneficial interest. As a result, Timberlake Financial has been consolidated in the Company's condensed financial statements. The Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets include the assets of Timberlake Financial recorded as fixed maturity investments and other invested assets, which consists of restricted cash and cash equivalents, with the liability for the credit facility depend uponnotes recorded as collateral finance facility. The Company's condensed consolidated statements of income include the Company's senior unsecured long-term debt rating. Australian Holdings immediately borrowed Australian $35.0 million underinvestment return of Timberlake Financial as investment income and the cost of the facility using the funds to repay the outstanding debt under a similar creditis reflected in collateral finance facility which expired in March 2006. As of March 31, 2006, the Company had Australian $35.0 million (approximately $25.1 million) outstanding under this new facility at an average interest rate of 6.20%. The credit agreement is unsecured but contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants customary for financings of this type.expense. 8. EQUITY BASED COMPENSATION Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(r), "Share-Based Payment" ("SFAS 123(r)"). SFAS 123(r) requires that the cost of all share-based transactions be recorded in the financial statements. The Company has been recording compensation cost for all equity-based grants or awards after January 1, 2003 consistent with the requirement of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS 148. Equity compensation 9 expense was $5.9$4.8 million and $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and $10.6 million and $3.5 million in the first quartersix months of 2006 and 2005, respectively. The adoption of SFAS 123(r) increased compensation expense recorded in the first quarter of 2006 by approximately $1.7 million, primarily related to unvested options from the 2002 grants, which were previously reported under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, and the acceleration of compensation expense for certain retirement eligible employees. Compensation cost associated with grants issued to retirement eligible employees prior to January 1, 2006 continues to be recognized over the nominal vesting period. In the first quarter of 2006, the company granted 336,725 incentive stock options at $47.47 weighted average per share and 144,097 performance contingent units ("PCUs") to employees. Additionally, non-employee directors were awarded a total of 4,800 shares of common stock. The remainder of the increase in compensation expense related to an increase in estimated shares required to settle PCUs granted in 2004 and the incremental expense from stock options and PCUs granted during the first quarter of 2006. As of March 31,June 30, 2006, the total compensation cost of non-vested awards not yet recognized in the financial statements was $28.1$24.3 million with various recognition periods over the next five years. The effect of applying the provisions of SFAS 123(r) on a pro forma basis to the comparable 2005 period did not have material effect on net income or earnings per share. 10 9. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In June, 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, treatment of interest and penalties, and disclosure of such positions. FIN 48 will be applied prospectively and will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effect, if any, of FIN 48 on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company prospectively adopted SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments" ("SFAS 155"). SFAS 155 amends SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133") and SFAS 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities".Liabilities." SFAS 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole, eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host, if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. In addition, among other changes, SFAS 155 (i) clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS 133; (ii) establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; (iii) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and (iv) eliminates the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity ("QSPE") from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial interest. The adoption of SFAS 155 did not have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements. In June 2005, the FASB cleared SFAS 133 Implementation Issue No. B38, "Embedded Derivatives: Evaluation of Net Settlement with Respect to the Settlement of a Debt Instrument through Exercise of an Embedded Put Option or Call Option" ("Issue B38") and SFAS 133 Implementation Issue No. B39, "Embedded Derivatives: Application of Paragraph 13(b) to Call Options That Are Exercisable Only by the Debtor" ("Issue B39"). Issue B38 clarified that the potential settlement of a debtor's obligation to a creditor occurring upon exercise of a put or call option meets the net settlement criteria of SFAS No. 133. Issue B39 clarified that an embedded call option, in which the underlying is an interest rate or interest rate index, that can accelerate the settlement of a debt host financial instrument should not be bifurcated and fair valued if the right to accelerate the settlement can be exercised only by the debtor (issuer/borrower) and the investor will recover substantially all of its initial net investment. Issues B38 and B39 which must be adopted as of the first day of the first fiscal quarter beginning after December 15, 2005. Issues B38 and B39 were adopted by the Company during the first quarter of 2006 and did not have a material effect on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements. In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")FASB issued SFAS No. 154, "Accounting Changes and Error Corrections, a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3" ("SFAS 154"). The statement requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements for corrections of errors or a voluntary change in accounting principle unless it is deemed impracticable. It also requires that a change in the method of depreciation, amortization, or depletion for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate rather than a change in accounting principle. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. SFAS 154 was adopted by the Company during the first quarter of 2006 and did not have a material effect on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements. 1011 ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OVERVIEW The Company's primary business is life reinsurance, which involves reinsuring life insurance policies that are often in force for the remaining lifetime of the underlying individuals insured, with premiums earned typically over a period of 10 to 30 years. Each year, however, a portion of the business under existing treaties terminates due to, among other things, lapses or surrenders of underlying policies, deaths of policyholders, and the exercise of recapture options by ceding companies. The Company derives revenues primarily from renewal premiums from existing reinsurance treaties, new business premiums from existing or new reinsurance treaties, income earned on invested assets, and fees earned from financial reinsurance transactions. The Company believes that industry trends have not changed materially from those discussed in its 2005 Annual Report. The Company's profitability primarily depends on the volume and amount of death claims incurred and its ability to adequately price the risks it assumes. While death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, claims become less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation from quarter to quarter and year to year. Effective July 1, 2003, the Company increased theThe maximum amount of coverage that itthe Company retains per life from $4 million tois $6 million. This increase does not affect business written prior to July 1, 2003. Claims in excess of this retention amount are retroceded to retrocessionaires; however, the Company remains fully liable to the ceding company for the entire amount of risk it assumes. The increase in the Company's retention limit from $4 million to $6 million reduces the amount of premiums it pays to retrocessionaires, but increases the maximum impact a single death claim can have on its results and therefore may result in additional volatility to its results from operations. The Company believes its sources of liquidity are sufficient to cover the potential increase in claims payments on both a short-term and long-term basis. The Company measures performance based on income or loss from continuing operations before income taxes for each of its five segments. The Company's U.S., Canada, Asia Pacific and Europe & South Africa operations provide traditional life reinsurance to clients. The Company's U.S. operations also provide asset-intensive and financial reinsurance products. The Company also provides insurers with critical illness reinsurance in its Canada, Asia Pacific and Europe & South Africa operations. Asia Pacific operations also provide financial reinsurance. The Corporate and Other segment results include the corporate investment activity, general corporate expenses, interest expense of RGA, operations of RGA Technology Partners, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary that develops and markets technology solutions, Argentine business in run-off and the provision for income taxes. The Company's discontinued accident and health operations are not reflected in its results from continuing operations. Effective January 1, 2006 the Company changed its method of allocating capital to its segments from a method based upon regulatory capital requirements to one based on underlying economic capital levels. The economic capital model is an internally developed risk capital model, the purpose of which is to measure the risk in the business and to provide a basis upon which capital is deployed. The economic capital model considers the unique and specific nature of the risks inherent in RGA's businesses. This is in contrast to the standardized regulatory risk based capital formula, which is not as refined in its risk calculations with respect to each of the Company's businesses. As a result of the economic capital allocation process, a portion of investment income and investment related gains (losses) is credited to the segments based on the level of allocated equity. In addition, the segments are charged for excess capital utilized above the allocated economic capital basis. This charge is included in policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses. The prior period segment results have been adjusted to conform to the new allocation methodology. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS Consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes increased $7.7$64.8 million, or 7.6%198.8%, and $72.5 million, or 54.4%, for the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006, compared to the first quarter of 2005,respectively. These increases were primarily due to goodimproved mortality results in the U.S. and Europe & South Africa segments, which experienced high claim levels in the comparable periods of 2005. These increases were offset in part by poor results due to adverse mortality experience in Canada. Consolidated net premiums increased $90.6$145.2 million, or 10.0%15.6%, and $235.9 million, or 12.9% during the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006.2006, respectively, due to growth in life reinsurance in force. Consolidated investment income, net of related expenses, increased $29.9$22.3 million, or 19.0%15.3%, and $52.2 million, or 17.2%, during the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006, respectively, primarily due to a larger invested asset base. Invested assets as of March 31,June 30, 2006 totaled $12.3$13.4 billion, a 11 13.4%20.1% increase over March 31,June 30, 2005. The increase 12 in invested assets is largely due to an $852.3 million increase in other invested assets related to the Company's collateral finance facility. While the Company's invested asset base has grown significantly since March 31,June 30, 2005, the average yield earned on investments, excluding funds withheld, increased only slightlydecreased from 5.75%5.99% during the firstsecond quarter of 2005 to 5.78%5.72% for the firstsecond quarter of 2006. The average yield will vary from quarter to quarter and year to year depending on a number of variables, including the prevailing interest rate and credit spread environment and changes in the mix of the underlying investments. Investment income and a portion of investment related gains (losses) are allocated to the segments based upon average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes. The effective tax rate on a consolidated basis was 34.8%34.5% for the firstsecond quarter of 2006, compared to 33.1%22.8% for the prior-year period. The prior-year period effective tax rate included the realizationutilization of a tax receivable againstloss carryforwards of $2.7 million, for which the Companyno prior financial statement benefit had initially established a valuation reserve.been taken. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES The Company's accounting policies are described in Note 2 in the 2005 Annual Report. The Company believes its most critical accounting policies include the capitalization and amortization of deferred acquisition costs ("DAC"); the establishment of liabilities for future policy benefits, other policy claims and benefits, including incurred but not reported claims; the valuation of investment impairments; and the establishment of arbitration or litigation reserves. The balances of these accounts are significant to the Company's financial position and require extensive use of assumptions and estimates, particularly related to the future performance of the underlying business. Additionally, for each of the Company's reinsurance contracts, it must determine if the contract provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk, in accordance with applicable accounting standards. The Company must review all contractual features, particularly those that may limit the amount of insurance risk to which the Company is subject or features that delay the timely reimbursement of claims. If the Company determines that the possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk will occur only under remote circumstances, it records the contract under a deposit method of accounting with the net amount receivable or payable reflected in premiums receivable and other reinsurance balances or other reinsurance liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Fees earned on the contracts are reflected as other revenues, as opposed to net premiums, on the condensed consolidated statements of income. Costs of acquiring new business, which vary with and are primarily related to the production of new business, have been deferred to the extent that such costs are deemed recoverable from future premiums or gross profits. Deferred policy acquisition costs reflect the Company's expectations about the future experience of the business in force and include commissions and allowances as well as certain costs of policy issuance and underwriting. Some of the factors that can affect the carrying value of DAC include mortality assumptions, interest spreads and policy lapse rates. The Company performs periodic tests to determine that DAC remains recoverable, and the cumulative amortization is re-estimated and, if necessary, adjusted by a cumulative charge or credit to current operations. Liabilities for future policy benefits under long-term life insurance policies (policy reserves) are computed based upon expected investment yields, mortality and withdrawal (lapse) rates, and other assumptions, including a provision for adverse deviation from expected claim levels. The Company primarily relies on its own valuation and administration systems to establish policy reserves. The policy reserves the Company establishes may differ from those established by the ceding companies due to the use of different mortality and other assumptions. However, the Company relies upon its clients to provide accurate data, including policy-level information, premiums and claims, which is the primary information used to establish reserves. The Company's administration departments work directly with its clients to help ensure information is submitted by them in accordance with the reinsurance contracts. Additionally, the Company performs periodic audits of the information provided by ceding companies. The Company establishes reserves for processing backlogs with a goal of clearing all backlogs within a ninety-day period. The backlogs are usually due to data errors the Company discovers or computer file compatibility issues, since much of the data reported to the Company is in electronic format and is uploaded to its computer systems. The Company periodically reviews actual historical experience and relative anticipated experience compared to the assumptions used to establish aggregate policy reserves. Further, the Company establishes premium deficiency reserves if actual and anticipated experience indicates that existing aggregate policy reserves, together with the present value of future gross premiums, are not sufficient to cover the present value of future benefits, settlement 13 and maintenance costs and to recover unamortized acquisition costs. The premium deficiency reserve is established 12 through a charge to income, as well as a reduction to unamortized acquisition costs and, to the extent there are no unamortized acquisition costs, an increase to future policy benefits. Because of the many assumptions and estimates used in establishing reserves and the long-term nature of the Company's reinsurance contracts, the reserving process, while based on actuarial science, is inherently uncertain. If the Company's assumptions, particularly on mortality, are inaccurate, its reserves may be inadequate to pay claims and there could be a material adverse effect on its results of operations and financial condition. Other policy claims and benefits include claims payable for incurred but not reported losses, which are determined using case-basis estimates and lag studies of past experience. These estimates are periodically reviewed and any adjustments to such estimates, if necessary, are reflected in current operations. The time lag from the date of the claim or death to the date when the ceding company reports the claim to the Company can vary significantly by ceding company and business segment, but averages around 3.0 months on a consolidated basis. The Company updates its analysis of incurred but not reported claims, including lag studies, on a periodic basis and adjusts its claim liabilities accordingly. The adjustments in a given period are generally not significant relative to the overall policy liabilities. The Company primarily invests in fixed maturity securities, and monitors these fixed maturity securities to determine potential impairments in value. With the Company's external investment managers, it evaluates its intent and ability to hold securities, along with factors such as the financial condition of the issuer, payment performance, the extent to which the market value has been below amortized cost, compliance with covenants, general market and industry sector conditions, and various other factors. Securities, based on management's judgments, with an other-than-temporary impairment in value are written down to management's estimate of fair value. Differences in experience compared with the assumptions and estimates utilized in the justification of the recoverability of DAC, in establishing reserves for future policy benefits and claim liabilities, or in the determination of other-than-temporary impairments to investment securities can have a material effect on the Company's results of operations and financial condition. The Company is currently a party to various litigation and arbitrations. While it is difficult to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of the pending litigation or arbitrations or even to provide useful ranges of potential losses, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that the outcomes of such litigation and arbitrations, after consideration of the provisions made in the Company's consolidated financial statements, would not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position. However, it is possible that an adverse outcome could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated net income or cash flows in a particular quarter or year. See Note 20, "Discontinued Operations" of the consolidated financial statements accompanying the 2005 Annual Report for more information. Further discussion and analysis of the three month results for 2006 compared to 2005 are presented by segment. Certain prior-year period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current-year presentation. Additionally, segment results for the prior-year period have been reclassified to conform to the economic capital process mentioned above. References to income before income taxes exclude the effects of discontinued operations. 1314 U.S. OPERATIONS U.S. operations consist of two major sub-segments: Traditional and Non-Traditional. The Traditional sub-segment primarily specializes in mortality-risk reinsurance. The Non-Traditional categorysub-segment consists of Asset-Intensive and Financial Reinsurance. FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2006 (IN THOUSANDS)
NON-TRADITIONAL ----------------------- TOTAL ASSET- FINANCIAL U.S. TRADITIONAL INTENSIVE REINSURANCE OPERATIONS ----------- --------- ----------- ---------- REVENUES: Net premiums $611,837$662,301 $ 1,4741,605 $ -- $613,311$663,906 Investment income, net of related expenses 71,042 70,897 (3) 141,93674,657 48,424 (152) 122,929 Investment related losses, net (1,229) (3,333)(2,506) (2,511) -- (4,562)(5,017) Change in value of embedded derivatives -- 4,552(11,075) -- 4,552(11,075) Other revenues (320) 3,289 7,346 10,315276 3,908 7,460 11,644 -------- --------------- ------ -------- Total revenues 681,330 76,879 7,343 765,552734,728 40,351 7,308 782,387 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 508,146 (869) 1 507,278545,640 727 -- 546,367 Interest credited 11,487 49,53711,796 31,930 -- 61,02443,726 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 82,172 16,395 2,334 100,901101,229 14,539 2,326 118,094 Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives -- 2,757(7,982) -- 2,757(7,982) Other operating expenses 10,126 1,776 1,354 13,2568,732 1,413 1,102 11,247 -------- --------------- ------ -------- Total benefits and expenses 611,931 69,596 3,689 685,216667,397 40,627 3,428 711,452 Income (loss) before income taxes $ 69,39967,331 $ 7,283 $3,654(276) $3,880 $ 80,33670,935 ======== =============== ====== ========
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2005 (IN THOUSANDS)
NON-TRADITIONAL ----------------------- TOTAL ASSET- FINANCIAL U.S. TRADITIONAL INTENSIVE REINSURANCE OPERATIONS ----------- --------- ----------- ---------- REVENUES: Net premiums $574,695 $ 1,117 $ -- $575,812 Investment income, net of related expenses 66,172 41,041 92 107,305 Investment related losses, net (2,633) (1,882) (5) (4,520) Change in value of embedded derivatives -- (19,917) -- (19,917) Other revenues 145 2,797 7,007 9,949 -------- -------- ------ -------- Total revenues 638,379 23,156 7,094 668,629 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 497,019 4,933 -- 501,952 Interest credited 14,303 23,730 -- 38,033 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 87,817 12,437 2,113 102,367 Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives -- (13,604) -- (13,604) Other operating expenses 10,038 1,236 1,345 12,619 -------- -------- ------ -------- Total benefits and expenses 609,177 28,732 3,458 641,367 Income (loss) before income taxes $ 29,202 $ (5,576) $3,636 $ 27,262 ======== ======== ====== ========
15 FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2006 (IN THOUSANDS)
NON-TRADITIONAL ----------------------- TOTAL ASSET- FINANCIAL U.S. TRADITIONAL INTENSIVE REINSURANCE OPERATIONS ----------- --------- ----------- ---------- REVENUES: Net premiums $1,274,138 $ 3,079 $ -- $1,277,217 Investment income, net of related expenses 145,699 119,321 (155) 264,865 Investment related losses, net (3,735) (5,844) -- (9,579) Change in value of embedded derivatives -- (6,523) -- (6,523) Other revenues (44) 7,197 14,806 21,959 ---------- -------- ------- ---------- Total revenues 1,416,058 117,230 14,651 1,547,939 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 1,053,786 (142) 1 1,053,645 Interest credited 23,283 81,467 -- 104,750 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 183,401 30,934 4,660 218,995 Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives -- (5,225) -- (5,225) Other operating expenses 18,858 3,189 2,456 24,503 ---------- -------- ------- ---------- Total benefits and expenses 1,279,328 110,223 7,117 1,396,668 Income before income taxes $ 136,730 $ 7,007 $ 7,534 $ 151,271 ========== ======== ======= ==========
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2005 (IN THOUSANDS)
NON-TRADITIONAL ----------------------- ASSET- FINANCIAL TOTAL TRADITIONAL INTENSIVE REINSURANCE U.S. ----------- --------- ----------- ---------- REVENUES: Net premiums $566,794$1,141,489 $ 1,2242,341 $ -- $568,018$1,143,830 Investment income, net of related expenses 63,325 56,654 70 120,049129,497 97,695 162 227,354 Investment related gains (losses), net (1,031) 3,516 (2) 2,483(3,664) 1,634 (7) (2,037) Change in value of embedded derivatives -- 22,5612,644 -- 22,5612,644 Other revenues 566 1,047 6,638 8,251711 3,844 13,645 18,200 ---------- -------- ------- ------ ------------------ Total revenues 629,654 85,002 6,706 721,3621,268,033 108,158 13,800 1,389,991 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 483,262 (1,684)980,281 3,249 2 481,580983,532 Interest credited 14,007 40,25128,310 63,981 -- 54,25892,291 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 73,638 13,687 1,961 89,286161,455 26,124 4,074 191,653 Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives -- 15,7082,104 -- 15,7082,104 Other operating expenses 9,259 1,338 1,437 12,03419,297 2,574 2,782 24,653 ---------- -------- ------- ------ ------------------ Total benefits and expenses 580,166 69,300 3,400 652,8661,189,343 98,032 6,858 1,294,233 Income (loss) before income taxes $ 49,488 $15,702 $3,30678,690 $ 68,49610,126 $ 6,942 $ 95,758 ========== ======== ======= ====== ==================
14 Income before income taxes for the U.S. operations segment totaled $80.3$70.9 million and $151.3 million for the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006, respectively, compared to $68.5$27.3 million and $95.8 million for the same periodperiods in the prior year. This increase in income can be primarily attributed to growth in total business in force and improved mortality experience overin the first quarterhalf of 2005.2006. Traditional Reinsurance The U.S. Traditional sub-segment provides life reinsurance to domestic clients for a variety of life products through yearly renewable term, coinsurance and modified coinsurance agreements. These reinsurance arrangements may be either facultative or automatic agreements. During the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006, this sub-segment added $47.9$41.7 billion and $89.6 billion of new business, respectively, compared to $36.0$48.3 billion and $84.3 16 billion during the same period in 2005. Management believes industry consolidation and the established practice of reinsuring mortality risks should continue to provide opportunities for growth. Income before income taxes for U.S. Traditional reinsurance increased 40.2%130.6% and 73.8% for the second quarter over the same prior-year period. Claims and other policy benefits, as a percentage of net premiums (loss ratios), were 83.1% for the first quarter of 2006 compared to 85.3% for the first threesix months of 2005. In addition, strongerthe 2006, respectively. Improved mortality experience in 2006 was the primary contributor to the overall growth in net income. Stronger premiums and higher investment income reflectalso contributed to the total increase in total business in force.net income. Net premiums for U.S. Traditional reinsurance increased 7.9%totaled $662.3 and $1,274.1 for the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006. ThisComparable prior-year amounts were $574.7 and $1,141.5, respectively. The 11.6% increase in year to date net premiums was driven primarily by the growth of total U.S. business in force, which totaled just over $1.1 trillion as of March 31,June 30, 2006, a 9.4%9.2% increase over the amount in force on March 31,as of June 30, 2005. Investment income and realized investment related gains and losses are allocated to the various operating segments based on average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes. Investment performance varies with the composition of investments and the relative allocation of capital to the operating segments. During the firstsecond quarter of 2006, investment income in the sub-segmentsegment totaled $71.0$74.7 million, a 12.2%12.8% increase over the same prior-year period. Year to date 2006, investment income grew 12.5% over the first six months of 2005. This increase can be primarily attributed to growth in the invested asset base. Mortality experience for the second quarter and the first threesix months of 2006 was in line with management's expectations, however,improved significantly over the same prior-year periods. Claims and other policy benefits, as previously mentioned, improved overa percentage of net premiums (loss ratios), were 82.4% for the second quarter and 82.7% for the first six months of 2006. The loss ratios for the comparative prior year.periods were 86.5% and 85.9%, respectively. Death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, but are less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation. Interest credited relates to amounts credited on cash value products, which have a significant mortality component. The amount of interest credited fluctuates in step with changes in deposit levels, cash surrender values and investment performance. Income before income taxes is affected by the spread between the investment income and the interest credited on the underlying products. Interest credited expense for the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006 totaled $11.5$11.8 million and $23.3 million, respectively, compared to $14.0$14.3 million and $28.3 million for the same periodperiods in 2005. The decrease is primarily the result of lower investment income earned onone treaty in which the assets supporting this business resultingcredited loan rate decreased from 5.7% in lower interest credited.2005 to 4.6% in 2006. Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses, as a percentage of net premiums, were 13.4%15.3% for the second quarter of 2006 and 14.4% for the first quartersix months of 2006 compared to 13.0%2006. Comparable ratios for the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2005.2005 were 15.3% and 14.1% respectively. Overall, while these ratios are expected to remain in a certain range, they may fluctuate from period to period due to varying allowance levels within coinsurance-type arrangements. In addition, the amortization pattern of previously capitalized amounts, which are subject to the form of the reinsurance agreement and the underlying insurance policies, may vary. Also,Additionally, the mix of first year coinsurance business versus yearly renewable term business can cause the percentage to fluctuate from period to period. Other operating expenses, as a percentage of net premiums, were 1.7%1.3% for the firstsecond quarter whichof 2006 and 1.5% year to date. This is reasonably consistent withslightly lower than the 1.6%1.7% reported quarter to date and year to date in same prior-year period.2005, primarily due to the continued premium growth in this segment. The expense ratio can fluctuate slightly from period to period, however, the size and maturity of the U.S. operations segment indicates it should remain relatively constant over the long term. Asset-Intensive Reinsurance The U.S. Asset-Intensive sub-segment assumes investment risk within underlying annuities and corporate-owned life insurance policies. Most of these agreements are coinsurance, coinsurance with funds withheld or modified coinsurance of non-mortality risks whereby the Company recognizes profits or losses primarily from the spread between the investment income earned and the interest credited on the underlying deposit liabilities. 15 In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 133 Implementation Issue No. B36, "Embedded Derivatives: Modified Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit Risk Exposures That Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor under Those Instruments" ("Issue B36"), 17 the Company recorded a change in value of embedded derivatives of $4.6$(11.1) million and $(6.5) million within revenues for the second quarter and $2.8first six months of 2006 respectively and $(8.0) million and $(5.2) million of related deferred acquisition costs. Comparable figures for 2005 were $22.6 million and $15.7 million, respectively. The Asset-Intensive sub-segment reported a loss before income taxes equal to $0.3 million for the second quarter of 2006 and income before income taxes of $7.3$7.0 million year to date. Compared to the prior year, income increased 95.1% over the second quarter, but decreased 30.8% from the first half of 2005. Investment related losses were the primary contributor to this decrease in income year over year. During the first half of 2006, the Company reported investment related losses of $(5.8) million relating to this segment compared to the $1.6 million of investment related gains recorded for the first half of 2005. The investment related losses were partially offset by higher interest rate spreads. Quarter over quarter, of 2006, a 53.6% decrease from the prior-year period. This decrease95.1% increase in income can be primarily attributed to investment related gains and losses which decreased from a net gain of $3.5 million in 2005 to a loss of $3.3 million in 2006. Strong investment spreads partially offset these losses. In addition, Issue B36 resulted in $5.1 million less ofbefore income in 2006 than 2005. Total revenues decreased $8.1 million or 9.6% from 2005 to 2006. Thistaxes is primarily the result of an $18.0 million decreaseincrease in the change in fair value of embedded derivatives and strong fund performance in various annuity contracts. Total revenues increased $17.2 million for the second quarter over quarter. In 2005,of 2006 and $9.1 million for the first six months of 2006. Contributing to this rise were an increase in investment income and an increase in the fair value of embedded derivatives. Investment income increased $7.4 and the fair value of embedded derivativederivatives increased due to$8.8 million from the tightening of credit spreads along with a significant increase in short-term rate yields. The spreads in the firstsecond quarter of 2006 also tightened, but not2005. Year to the same extent. In addition,date, investment income is up $21.6 million; however, this sub-segment reported a $6.8 million decrease in investment related gains and losses over prior quarter. These decreases were partiallyis offset by the change in the embedded derivatives, which is down $9.2 million from same prior-year period. The increase in investment income associated with a larger asset base.is primarily related to higher investment income earned on the funds withheld assets, however it is almost entirely offset by an increase in interest credited. The fair value of embedded derivatives is tied primarily to the movement in interest rates and credit spreads; therefore the value may fluctuate significantly. The average invested asset base supporting this segment grew from $3.7 billion in the firstsecond quarter of 2005 to $4.1$4.2 billion for the firstsecond quarter of 2006. The growth in the asset base is primarily driven by new business written on one existing annuity treaty. Invested assets outstanding as of March 31,June 30, 2006 were $4.1$4.3 billion, of which $2.6$2.7 billion were funds withheld at interest. Of the $2.6$2.7 billion of total funds withheld balance as of March 31June 30, 2006, 88.0%89.1% of the balance is associated with one client. Total benefits and expenses, which are comprised primarily of interest credited and policy acquisition costs, increased less than 1.0%41.4% from the firstsecond quarter of 2005.2005 and 12.4% year to date. Interest credited increased $8.2 million and $17.5 million for the second quarter and first six months of 2006, however this increase is primarily offset by the increase in investment income. The large decreasechange in the amortization of deferred acquisition expensescosts relating to Issue B36 was essentially offset by increases in both interest credited and policy acquisition costs. The rise in interest credited correlates withincreased $5.6 million over second quarter 2005, but decreased $7.3 million year to date. As stated above, significant fluctuations may occur as the increase in investment income, bothfair value of which are driven by the growthderivatives is tied primarily to the movements in the average asset base.interest rates and credit spreads affecting the underlying funds withheld investment portfolios. Financial Reinsurance The U.S. Financial Reinsurance sub-segment income consists primarily of net fees earned on financial reinsurance transactions. The majority of the financial reinsurance risks assumed by the Company are retroceded to other insurance companies. The fees earned from the assumption of the financial reinsurance contracts are reflected in other revenues, and the fees paid to retrocessionaires are reflected in policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses. Fees are also earned on brokered business in which the Company does not participate in the assumption of the financial reinsurance. This income is reflected in other revenues. Income before income taxes increased 10.5%6.7%, during the firstsecond quarter of 2006 and 8.5% for the first six months compared to the same periodperiods in 2005. The increase in income primarily relates to several new transactions that occurredwere executed in late 2005. At March 31,June 30, 2006 and 2005, the amount of reinsurance provided, as measured by pre-tax statutory surplus, was $1.8 billion.$1.84 billion and $1.77 billion respectively. The pre-tax statutory surplus includes all business assumed or brokered by the Company. Fees earned from this business can vary significantly depending on the size of the transactions and the timing of their completion and therefore can fluctuate from period to period. 18 CANADA OPERATIONS The Company conducts reinsurance business in Canada through RGA Life Reinsurance Company of Canada ("RGA Canada"), a wholly-owned subsidiary. RGA Canada assists clients with capital management activity and mortality risk management, and is primarily engaged in traditional individual life reinsurance, as well as group reinsurance and non-guaranteed critical illness products. 16
2006 2005 -------- ------- FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, (IN THOUSANDS)FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED ----------------------------- ----------------------------- (in thousands) JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- REVENUES: Net premiums $ 94,402 $73,75697,120 $ 76,854 $191,522 $150,610 Investment income, net of related expenses 25,305 22,53725,998 22,372 51,303 44,909 Investment related gains, (losses), net (199) 6352,345 1,667 2,146 2,302 Other revenues -- 34767 19 767 53 -------- --------------- -------- -------- Total revenues 119,508 96,962126,230 100,912 245,738 197,874 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 89,079 68,64595,449 74,252 184,528 142,897 Interest credited 205 357207 252 412 609 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 17,820 8,83815,769 11,992 33,589 20,830 Other operating expenses 3,973 3,4603,731 3,619 7,704 7,079 -------- --------------- -------- -------- Total benefits and expenses 111,077 81,300115,156 90,115 226,233 171,415 Income before income taxes $ 8,431 $15,66211,074 $ 10,797 $ 19,505 $ 26,459 ======== =============== ======== ========
Income before income taxes increased by $0.3 million or 2.6%, and decreased by $7.2$7.0 million or 46.2%26.3%, in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively. A stronger Canadian dollar resulted in an increase in income before income taxes of $1.1 million and $1.9 million in the second quarter and first six months of 2006. The decrease2006, respectively, as compared to 2005. Results in 2006 was primarily the result of lessreflect unfavorable mortality experience versus favorable mortality experience in the current period as well as a decrease in investment related gains of $0.8 million.2005. Net premiums increased by $20.6$20.3 million, or 28.0% in26.4%, and $40.9 million or 27.2% for the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006, from the prior-year quarter.respectively. The increase isincreases are primarily due to new business from new and existing treaties. Approximately $7.4$6.3 million of the premium increase in the second quarter, and $13.7 million in the first six months of 2006, represents the effect of two inforce creditor treaties which were executed in late 2005. In addition, a stronger Canadian dollar resulted in an increase in net premiums of $5.5$9.4 million and $14.9 million in the second quarter and first quarter insix months of 2006, respectively, as compared to 2005. Premium levels are significantly influenced by large transactions, mix of business and reporting practices of ceding companies and therefore can fluctuate from period to period. Net investment income increased $2.8$3.6 million, or 12.3%16.2%, and $6.4 million, or 14.2%, in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006, compared torespectively. A stronger Canadian dollar resulted in an increase in net investment income of $2.3 million and $3.9 million in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2005.2006, respectively. Investment income represents an allocation to the segments based upon average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support business volumes. Investment performance varies with the composition of investments and the relative allocation of capital to the operating segments. The increase in investment income was mainly the result of an increase in the allocated asset base due to growth in the underlying business volume and a stronger Canadian dollar, which resulted in an increase of $0.9 million. For the first quarter of 2006, the loss ratiovolume. Loss ratios for this segment was 94.4%were 98.3% and 96.3% in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively, compared to 93.1%96.6% and 94.9% in 2005.the comparable prior-year periods. Excluding creditor business, the loss ratioratios for this segment was 102.4%were 106.3% and 104.0% in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006, respectively, compared to 94.4%19 98.4% and 96.4% in the comparable prior-year period.periods. The higher loss ratioratios in 2006 isare primarily due to unfavorable mortality experience compared to the prior year, as well as the strengthening of the Canadian dollar. Historically, the loss ratio increased primarily as the result of several large permanent level premium in-force blocks assumed in 19981997 and 1997.1998. These blocks are mature blocks of permanent level premium business in which mortality as a percentage of net premiums is expected to be higher than the historical ratios. The nature of permanent level premium policies requires the Company to set up actuarial liabilities and invest the amounts received in excess of early-year mortality costs to fund claims in the later years when premiums, by design, continue to be level as compared to expected increasing mortality or claim costs. Claims and other policy benefits, as a percentage of net premiums and investment income were 74.4% during77.5% and 76.0% in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively, compared to 71.3%74.8% and 73.1% in 2005.the comparable prior-year periods. Death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, but are less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation. Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums totaled 18.9%16.2% and 17.5% in the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006, respectively, compared to 15.6% and 12.0%13.8% in 2005.the comparable prior-year periods. Excluding the impact of the stronger Canadian dollar and creditor business, policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums totaled 15.2%11.2% and 13.3% in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively, compared to 11.0%14.8% and 13.0% in 2005.the comparable prior-year periods. Overall, while these ratios are expected to remain in a certain range, they may fluctuate from period to period due to varying allowance levels.levels, significantly caused by the mix of first year coinsurance business versus yearly renewable term business. In addition, the amortization pattern of previously capitalized amounts, which are subject to the form of the reinsurance agreement and the underlying insurance 17 policies may vary. Also, the mix of first year coinsurance business versus yearly renewable term business can cause the percentage to fluctuate from period to period. Other operating expenses increased $0.5$0.1 million, or 14.8%3.1%, and $0.6 million or 8.8% in 2006. A strongerthe second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively. The increase in expenses is primarily due to the strengthening of the Canadian dollar resulted in an increase of $0.2 million.dollar. Other operating expenses as a percentage of net premiums totaled 4.2%3.8% and 4.0% in the second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively, compared to 4.7% in 2005.each of the comparable prior-year periods. EUROPE & SOUTH AFRICA OPERATIONS The Europe & South Africa segment has operations in India, Mexico, Spain, South Africa and the United Kingdom. The segment provides life reinsurance for a variety of products through yearly renewable term and coinsurance agreements, and reinsurance of accelerated critical illness coverage, which pays on the earlier of death or diagnosis of a pre-defined critical illness. Reinsurance agreements may be either facultative or automatic agreements covering primarily individual risks and in some markets, group risks.
2006 2005 -------- -------- FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, (IN THOUSANDS)FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED ----------------------------- ----------------------------- (in thousands) JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- REVENUES: Net premiums $145,151 $141,358$146,073 $132,972 $291,224 $274,330 Investment income, net of related expenses 3,392 2,5283,873 2,502 7,265 5,030 Investment related gains,losses, net 34 14(181) (180) (147) (166) Other revenues 91 101(178) 69 (87) 170 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total revenues 148,668 144,001149,587 135,363 298,255 279,364 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 105,646 96,332101,034 112,117 206,680 208,449 Interest credited 156 190 363346 553 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 19,257 27,13321,821 22,782 41,078 49,915 Other operating expenses 8,778 5,6609,307 7,118 18,085 12,778 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total benefits and expenses 133,871 129,488132,318 142,207 266,189 271,695 Income (loss) before income taxes $ 14,79717,269 $ 14,513 -------- --------(6,844) $ 32,066 $ 7,669 ======== ======== ======== ========
20 Income before income taxes was $14.8$17.3 million during the firstsecond quarter of 2006 as compared to $14.5a loss before income taxes of $6.8 million during the firstsecond quarter of 2005, and $32.1 million for the first six months of 2006 as compared to $7.7 million for the first six months of 2005. ThisThe increase for the second quarter and first six months of 2006 was primarily the result of favorable mortality experience in 2006 compared with adverse mortality experience in 2005 in the growthUK market. The increases in premiums and investment income before income taxes were partially offset partially by an increase in other operating expenses anddue to adverse foreign currency exchange fluctuations totaling approximately $0.3 million and $1.5 million during the second quarter and first six months of $1.2 million.2006, respectively. Net premiums increased $3.8$13.1 million, or 2.7%9.9%, during the firstsecond quarter ofcompared to the same period last year, and increased $16.9 million or 6.2% during the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period last year. This increase was primarily the result of new business from both existing and new treaties. Several foreign currencies, particularly the British pound, the euro, and the South African rand weakened against the U.S. dollar and adversely affected net premiums by approximately $9.7$1.8 million and $11.5 million for the current quarter. Also, asecond quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively. A significant portion of the net premiums were due to reinsurance of accelerated critical illness, primarily in the UK. Net premiums earned during the second quarter and first six months associated with critical illness coverage totaled $49.2$52.4 million and $101.6 million, respectively, compared to $49.3 million and $100.2 million in the first quarter of 2006 compared to $50.9 million in the first quarter of 2005.prior-year periods. Premium levels are significantly influenced by large transactions and reporting practices of ceding companies and therefore can fluctuate from period to period. Investment income increased $0.9$1.4 million for the firstsecond quarter ofcompared to the same period in 2005 and increased $2.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. This increase was primarily due to an increase in allocated investment income. Investment income and realized investment related gains and losses are allocated to the various operating segments based on average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes. Investment performance varies with the composition of investments and the relative allocation of capital to the operating segments. Loss ratios were 72.8% and 68.1%decreased from 84.3% for the first three monthssecond quarter of 2005 to 69.2% for the second quarter of 2006, and from 76.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 respectively.to 71.0% for the six months ended June 30, 2006. As mentioned above, favorable mortality experience in the UK market contributed to the decrease in the loss ratio. Death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, but are less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation. 18 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums were 13.3%14.9% in the firstsecond quarter of 2006 compared to 19.2%17.1% in the firstsecond quarter of 2005, and 14.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 18.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2005. These percentages fluctuate due to timing of client company reporting, variations in the mixture of business being reinsured and the relative maturity of the business. In addition, as the segment grows, renewal premiums, which have lower allowances than first-year premiums, represent a greater percentage of the total net premiums. Accordingly, the change in the mixture of business during the current quarter caused the loss ratio to slightly increase and caused the policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums to slightly decrease. Other operating expenses for the quarter increased to 6.0%from 5.4% of net premiums in 2005 to 6.4% in 2006, and for the first six months it increased from 4.0% in 2005.4.7% to 6.2%. This increase was due to higher costs associated with maintaining and supporting the increase in business over the past several years. The Company believes that sustained growth in net premiums should lessen the burden of start-up expenses and expansion costs over time. ASIA PACIFIC OPERATIONS The Asia Pacific segment has operations in Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan and mainland China. The principal types of reinsurance for this segment include life, critical care and illness, disability income, superannuation, and financial reinsurance. Superannuation is the Australian government mandated compulsory retirement savings program. Superannuation funds accumulate retirement funds for employees, and in addition, offer life and disability insurance coverage. Reinsurance agreements may be either facultative or automatic agreements covering primarily individual risks and in some markets, group risks. 21
2006 2005 -------- -------- FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, (IN THOUSANDS)FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED ----------------------------- ----------------------------- (in thousands) JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- REVENUES: Net premiums $139,213 $118,208$168,852 $145,018 $308,065 $263,226 Investment income, net of related expenses 6,496 4,7406,822 5,269 13,318 10,009 Investment related gains (losses), net 15 (47)(92) 101 (77) 54 Other revenues 1,910 (187)1,581 2,135 3,491 1,948 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total revenues 147,634 122,714177,163 152,523 324,797 275,237 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits 110,356 90,660131,866 110,617 242,222 201,277 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 22,005 24,47027,567 23,371 49,572 47,841 Other operating expenses 8,659 4,67410,005 7,159 18,664 11,833 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total benefits and expenses 141,020 119,804169,438 141,147 310,458 260,951 Income before income taxes $ 6,6147,725 $ 2,91011,376 $ 14,339 $ 14,286 ======== ======== ======== ========
Income before income taxes increaseddecreased $3.7 million, or 32.1%, during the firstsecond quarter of 2006, but remained relatively consistent for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the same periodperiods in 2005. The increase in income before income taxes was primarily the result of strong premium growth, and favorable results in certain significant markets, primarily Australia and Japan. The favorable results in Australia and Japan were partially offset by poor mortality results in Korea. Strong growth in Asia Pacific business volume correlated directly with an increase in investment income of $1.8 million from 2005 to 2006. A $2.1 million increase in other revenues for the segment also contributed to the increasedecrease in income before income taxes for the firstsecond quarter of 2006 was primarily the result of a higher claims level in the New Zealand market. Strong premium growth, particularly in Australia, Japan and Korea, and favorable overall results in certain markets, primarily Australia and Japan, partially offset the increased claims in New Zealand. Adverse foreign currency exchange fluctuations resulted in a decrease in income before income taxes totaling approximately $0.3 million and $1.0 million during the second quarter and first six months of 2006, respectively. Net premiums grew $23.8 million, or 16.4%, during the current quarter, and $44.8 million, or 17.0%, for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the same quarter in 2005. The increase in income before income taxes was partially offset by adverse foreign currency exchange fluctuations totaling approximately $0.6 million. Net premiums grew $21.0 million, or 17.8%, during the current quarter as compared to the same periodperiods in 2005. This premium growth was primarily the result of continued increases in the volume of business in Australia, Japan and Korea. Due to continued growth in its group business, premiums in Australia increased by $8.2$9.4 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2006, and $15.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the firstsame periods in 2005. Japan premium increased by $7.8 million in the second quarter of 2005.2006, and $12.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the same periods in 2005, primarily due to the growth of four significant clients. Korea's premium increased by $9.1 million in the second quarter of 2006, and $18.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same periods in 2005, primarily due to the growth in business with three significant clients. Premium levels are significantly influenced by large transactions and reporting practices of ceding companies and therefore can fluctuate from period to period. A portion of the premiums for the segment during the first quarter of each yearperiod presented is due to reinsurance of 19 critical illness as a stand alone benefit, or as an accelerated benefit on a life insurance policy. This coverage provides a benefit in the event of a death from, or the diagnosis of, a defined critical illness. Reinsurance of critical illness in the Asia Pacific operations is offered primarily in Australia and Korea. Premiums earned from this coverage totaled $11.7$23.2 million and $34.9 million during the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2006, respectively, compared to $19.9 million and $15.9$37.0 million during the second quarter and first quartersix months of 2005.2005, respectively. Foreign currencies in certain significant markets, particularly the Australian dollar and the Japanese Yen, began to weaken against the U.S. dollar during the first quarter of 2006. The overall effect of changes in local Asia Pacific segment currencies was a decrease in net premiums of approximately $5.8$3.0 million in the firstsecond quarter of 2006 and a decrease of approximately $8.8 million in net premiums for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the same periods in 2005. Net investment income increased $1.8$1.5 million in the current quarter compared to the prior-year quarter.quarter, and $3.3 22 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily due to growth in the invested assets in Australia, along with an increase in allocated investment income. Investment income and investment related gains and losses are allocated to the various operating segments based on average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes. Investment performance varies with the composition of investments and the relative allocation of capital to the operating segments. Other revenues increaseddecreased by $2.1$0.5 million for the firstsecond quarter of 2006, as compared to the same period in 2005, but increased by $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to the same period in 2005. The primary source of other revenues during the first quarter of 2006 washas been fees from three financial reinsurance treaties in the Japan market. Other revenue in the firstsecond quarter of 2005 includes the effectseffect of the recapture of a significant client treaty in Hong Kong. Loss ratios were 79.3%78.1% and 76.7%76.3% for the firstsecond quarter of 2006 and 2005, respectively, and 78.6% and 76.5% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and June 30, 2005, respectively. The current quarterincreased loss ratio was higher thanfor the comparable prior-year period primarilysecond quarter was due to adverse experience in New Zealand's disability income products in 2006. Also contributing to the loss ratio increase for the six month period was adverse mortality experience in Korea and to a lesser extent in New Zealand.during the first quarter of 2006. Loss ratios will fluctuate due to timing of client company reporting, variations in the mixture of business being reinsured and the relative maturity of the business. Death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, but are less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation. Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums were 15.8%16.3% during the firstsecond quarter of 2006, and 20.7%which is relatively consistent with the 16.1% ratio for the firstsecond quarter of 2005. The ratio of policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums will generally decline as the business matures, however, the percentage does fluctuate periodically due to timing of client company reporting and variations in the mixture of business being reinsured. Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums were 16.1% during the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to an 18.2% ratio for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The decline inratio for the first six months of 2005 was affected by increased amortization of deferred policy acquisition ratio between the first quarter of 2006 and the first quarter of 2005 is caused in part by a maturation of significant blocks of business in Korea. Allowances for renewal premium are generally lower than first year premium allowances. The comparison of the policy acquisition ratio between the first quarter of 2006 and the first quarter of 2005 is also affected by the amortization of a DAC balance of approximately $3.0 millioncosts associated with the recapture of a significant treaty in Hong Kong in the first quarter of 2005. Other operating expenses increased to 6.2%5.9% of net premiums in the current quarter, and 6.1% of net premiums for the six months ended June 30, 2006, from 4.0%4.9% and 4.5% in the comparable prior-year period.periods. The timing of premium flows and the level of costs associated with the entrance into and development of new markets in the growing Asia Pacific segment may cause other operating expenses as a percentage of net premiums to fluctuate over periods of time. CORPORATE AND OTHER OPERATIONS Corporate and Other revenues include investment income from invested assets not allocated to support segment operations and undeployed proceeds from the Company's capital raising efforts, in addition to unallocated realized capitalinvestment related gains orand losses. General corporateCorporate expenses consist of the offset to capital charges allocated to the operating segments within the policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses line item, unallocated overhead and executive costs, and interest expense related to debt and the $225.0 million of 5.75% Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable trust preferred securities. Additionally, the Corporate and Other Operations includes results from RGA Technology Partners, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary that develops and markets technology solutions for the insurance industry, the Company's Argentine privatized pension business, which is currently in run-off, and an insignificant amount of direct insurance operations in Argentina. 2023
2006 2005 ------- ------- FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, (IN THOUSANDS)FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED ----------------------------- ----------------------------- (in thousands) JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 JUNE 30, 2006 JUNE 30, 2005 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- REVENUES: Net premiums $ 365652 $ 480698 $ 1,017 $ 1,178 Investment income, net of related expenses 9,812 7,1998,983 8,836 18,795 16,035 Investment related gains (losses), net 5,344 894(2,369) 15,882 2,975 16,776 Other revenues 2,214 2,604(97) 8,489 2,117 11,093 -------- ------- --------------- -------- Total revenues 17,735 11,1777,169 33,905 24,904 45,082 BENEFITS AND EXPENSES: Claims and other policy benefits (846) 836(185) 28,992 (1,031) 29,828 Interest credited 110 75643 140 753 215 Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses (8,179) (5,751)(10,551) (2,657) (18,730) (8,408) Other operating expenses 11,861 7,17811,540 7,517 23,401 14,695 Interest expense 16,767 9,88515,014 9,895 31,781 19,780 Collateral finance facility expense 277 -- 277 -- -------- ------- --------------- -------- Total benefits and expenses 19,713 12,22316,738 43,887 36,451 56,110 Loss before income taxes $(1,978) $(1,046)$ (9,569) $(9,982) $(11,547) $(11,028) ======== ======= =============== ========
Loss before income taxes decreased $0.4 million and increased $0.9 million$0.5 during the first quarterthree and six month periods ended June 30, 2006, respectively. These variances are the net result of 2006 from $1.1 million during the same period in 2005. This increase was primarily due toreduced claims and other policy benefits, offset by increased interest expense and operating expenses largely offset by an increaseand a reduction in investment related gains. Investment income and investment related gains.gains are the result of an allocation to other segments based upon average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support their business volumes. The reduction in other revenues was attributable primarily to less favorable foreign currency adjustments. The reduction in claims and other policy benefits was due to a $24.0 million increase in the reserves associated with the reinsurance of Argentine pension accounts during the second quarter of 2005. The increase in interest expense is due to the issuance of $400 million in Junior Subordinated Debentures in the fourth quarter of 2005. The increase in operating expenses is largely due to additional expense related to equity based compensation plans. Investment income and investment related gains are the result of an allocation to other segments based upon average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support their business volumes. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS The discontinued accident and health division reported a loss, net of taxes, of $1.5$0.2 million for the firstsecond quarter of 2006 compared to a loss, net of taxes, of $0.7$3.3 million for the firstsecond quarter of 2005. As of March 31,June 30, 2006, amounts in dispute or subject to audit exceed the Company's reserves by approximately $23.5$23.8 million. The calculation of the claim reserve liability for the entire portfolio of accident and health business requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported claim reserve levels. Management must make estimates and assumptions based on historical loss experience, changes in the nature of the business, anticipated outcomes of claim disputes and claims for rescission, and projected future premium run-off, all of which may affect the level of the claim reserve liability. Due to the significant uncertainty associated with the run-off of this business, net income in future periods could be affected positively or negatively. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Holding Company RGA is a holding company whose primary uses of liquidity include, but are not limited to, the immediate capital needs of its operating companies associated with the Company's primary businesses, dividends paid by RGA to its shareholders, interest payments on its indebtedness, and repurchases of RGA common stock under a plan approved 24 by the board of directors. The primary sources of RGA's liquidity include proceeds from its capital raising efforts, interest income on undeployed corporate investments, interest income received on surplus notes with two operating subsidiaries, and dividends from operating subsidiaries. As the Company continues its expansion efforts, RGA will continue to be dependent on these sources of liquidity. The Company believes that it has sufficient liquidity to fund its cash needs under various scenarios that include the potential risk of the early recapture of a reinsurance treaty by the ceding company and significantly higher than expected death claims. Historically, the Company has generated positive net cash flows from operations. However, 21 in the event of significant unanticipated cash requirements beyond normal liquidity, the Company has multiple liquidity alternatives available based on market conditions and the amount and timing of the liquidity need. These options include borrowings under committed credit facilities, secured borrowings, the ability to issue long-term debt, capital securities or common equity and, if necessary, the sale of invested assets. Cash Flows The Company's net cash flows provided by operating activities for the three monthsperiods ended March 31,June 30, 2006 and 2005 were $152.1$307.9 million and $181.0$202.9 million, respectively. Cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of premiums received, claims paid, and working capital changes. The $29.0$105.0 million net decreaseincrease in operating cash flows during the first quartersix months of 2006 compared to the same period in 2005 was primarily a result of cash inflows related to premiums and investment income increasing more than cash outflows related to claims, acquisition costs, income taxes and other operating expenses increasing more than cash inflows related to premiums and investment income.expenses. Cash from premiums and investment income increased $103.7$217.4 million and $31.9$56.1 million, respectively, and was offset by higher operating cash outlays of $164.6$168.5 million during the current quarter.six month period. The Company believes the short-term cash requirements of its business operations will be sufficiently met by the positive cash flows generated. Additionally, the Company believes it maintains a high quality fixed maturity portfolio with positive liquidity characteristics. These securities are available for sale and could be sold if necessary to meet the Company's short and long-term obligations. Net cash provided by investing activities was $21.0 million in the first quarter of 2006 and net cash used in investing activities was $210.8$1.0 billion and $146.1 million in the first quartersix months of 2005.2006 and the comparable prior-year period, respectively. This change is primarily due to the increase in particular,other invested assets, which includes $852.3 million of restricted cash and cash equivalents, related to the Company's collateral finance facility. The sales and purchases of fixed maturity securities, are primarily related to the management of the Company's investment portfolios and the investment of excess cash generated by operating and financing activities. The majority of the cash generated by the change in short-term investments and other invested assets was used to repay the Company's $100 million Senior Notes in April 2006. Net cash provided by financing activities was $130.0 million and $14.2$855.8 million in the first quartersix months of 2006 and 2005, respectively.net cash used in financing activities was $47.4 million in the same period of 2005. This change was largely due to the proceeds from the Company's collateral finance facility and an increase in securitized lending activities which had a balancepartially offset by $100.0 million principal payments on debt. Also contributing to the change were excess deposits from universal life and other investment type policies and contracts of $108.4$49.8 million at March 31, 2006.during the current period compared to net withdrawals of $47.4 million in 2005. Debt and Preferred Securities As of March 31,June 30, 2006, the Company had $799.7$702.3 million in outstanding borrowings under its debt agreements and was in compliance with all covenants under those agreements. The Company maintains three revolving credit facilities. The Company's largest credit facility that expires in September 2010, is a syndicated credit facility with an overall capacity of $600.0 million.million that expires in September 2010. The overall capacity available for issuance of letters of credit is reduced by any cash borrowings made by the Company against this credit facility. The Company may borrow up to $300.0 million of cash under the facility. As of March 31,June 30, 2006 the Company's outstanding cash balance was $50.0 million under this credit facility, with an average interest rate of 5.16%5.64%. The Company's other credit facilities consist of a (pound)15.0L15.0 million credit facility that expires in May 2007 and an Australian $50.0 million credit facility that expires in MarchJune 2011. The Company's foreign denominated credit facilities had a combined outstanding balance of $51.1$53.7 million as of March 31,June 30, 2006. The average interest rate on all long-term debt outstanding, excluding the Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust holding solely junior subordinated debentures of the Company ("Trust Preferred Securities"), was 6.64%6.59%. Interest is expensed on the face amount, or $225 million, of the Trust Preferred Securities at a rate of 5.75%. 25 Collateral Finance Facility On June 28, 2006, RGA's subsidiary, Timberlake Financial, L.L.C. ("Timberlake Financial"), issued $850.0 million of Series A Floating Rate Insured Notes due June 2036 in a private placement. The notes were issued to fund the collateral requirements for statutory reserves required by the U.S. valuation of Life Policies Model Regulation (commonly referred to as Regulation XXX) on specified term life insurance policies reinsured by RGA Reinsurance Company. Proceeds from the notes have been deposited into a series of trust accounts that collateralize the notes and are not available to satisfy the general obligations of the Company. Interest on the notes will accrue at an annual rate of 1-month LIBOR plus a base rate margin, payable monthly. The payment of interest and principal on the notes is insured through a financial guaranty insurance policy with a third party. The notes represent senior, secured indebtedness of Timberlake Financial and its assets with no recourse to RGA or its other subsidiaries. Timberlake Financial will rely primarily upon the receipt of interest and principal payments on a surplus note and dividend payments from its wholly-owned subsidiary, Timberlake Reinsurance Company II ("Timberlake Re"), a South Carolina captive insurance company, to make payments of interest and principal on the notes. The ability of Timberlake Re to make interest and principal payments on the surplus note and dividend payments to Timberlake Financial is contingent upon South Carolina regulatory approval and the performance of specified term life insurance policies with guaranteed level premiums retroceded by RGA's subsidiary, RGA Reinsurance Company, to Timberlake Re. In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Interpretation No. 46(r), "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities - An Interpretation of ARB No. 51," Timberlake Financial is considered to be a variable interest entity and the Company is deemed to hold the primary beneficial interest. As a result, Timberlake Financial has been consolidated in the Company's condensed financial statements. The Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets include the assets of Timberlake Financial recorded as fixed maturity investments and other invested assets, which consists of restricted cash and cash equivalents, with the liability for the notes recorded as collateral finance facility. The Company's condensed consolidated statements of income include the investment return of Timberlake Financial as investment income and the cost of the facility is reflected in collateral finance facility expense. Asset / Liability Management The Company actively manages its assets using an approach that is intended to balance quality, diversification, asset/liability matching, liquidity and investment return. The goals of the investment process are to optimize after-tax, risk-adjusted investment income and after-tax, risk-adjusted total return while managing the assets and liabilities on a cash flow and duration basis. The Company has established target asset portfolios for each major insurance product, which represent the investment strategies intended to profitably fund its liabilities within acceptable risk parameters. These strategies include objectives for effective duration, yield curve sensitivity and convexity, liquidity, asset sector concentration and credit quality. 22 The Company's liquidity position (cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments) was $475.3$306.4 million and $255.0 million at March 31,June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Approximately $100 million of the cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2006 was used to repay the maturity of Senior Notes in April 2006. Liquidity needs are determined from valuation analyses conducted by operational units and are driven by product portfolios. Annual evaluations of demand liabilities and short-term liquid assets are designed to adjust specific portfolios, as well as their durations and maturities, in response to anticipated liquidity needs. The Company occasionally enters into sales of investment securities under agreements to repurchase the same securities to help manage its short-term liquidity requirements. These transactions are reported as collateralized financings and the repurchase obligation is a component ofsecuritized lending obligations within other liabilities. There were $108.4$76.5 million of these agreements outstanding at March 31,June 30, 2006 and there were no agreements outstanding at December 31, 2005. Future Liquidity and Capital Needs Based on the historic cash flows and the current financial results of the Company, subject to any dividend limitations which may be imposed by various insurance regulations, management believes RGA's cash flows from operating activities, together with undeployed proceeds from its capital raising efforts, including interest and investment income on those proceeds, interest income received on surplus notes with two operating subsidiaries, and its ability to raise funds in the capital markets, will be sufficient to enable RGA to make dividend payments to 26 its shareholders, to make interest payments on its senior indebtedness and junior subordinated notes, to repurchase RGA common stock under the plan approved by the board of directors, and to meet its other liquidity obligations. A general economic downturn or a downturn in the equity and other capital markets could adversely affect the market for many annuity and life insurance products. Because the Company obtains substantially all of its revenues through reinsurance arrangements that cover a portfolio of life insurance products, as well as annuities, its business would be harmed if the market for annuities or life insurance were adversely affected. INVESTMENTS The Company had total cash and invested assets of $12.7$13.7 billion and $11.0$11.3 billion at March 31,June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. All investments made by RGA and its subsidiaries conform to the qualitative and quantitative limits prescribed by the applicable jurisdiction's insurance laws and regulations. In addition, the Boards of Directors of the various operating companies periodically review the investment portfolios of their respective subsidiaries. RGA's Board of Directors also receives reports on material investment portfolios. The Company's investment strategy is to maintain a predominantly investment-grade, fixed maturity portfolio, to provide adequate liquidity for expected reinsurance obligations, and to maximize total return through prudent asset management. The Company's earned yield on invested assets, excluding funds withheld, was 5.78%5.72% during the firstsecond quarter of 2006, compared with 5.75%5.99% for the firstsecond quarter of 2005. See "Note 5 - INVESTMENTS"Investments" in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the 2005 Annual Report for additional information regarding the Company's investments. The Company's fixed maturity securities are invested primarily in commercial and industrial bonds, public utilities, U.S. and Canadian government securities, as well as mortgage- and asset-backed securities. As of March 31,June 30, 2006, approximately 96.9%96.8% of the Company's consolidated investment portfolio of fixed maturity securities was investment grade. Important factors in the selection of investments include diversification, quality, yield, total rate of return potential and call protection. The relative importance of these factors is determined by market conditions and the underlying product or portfolio characteristics. Cash equivalents are invested in high-grade money market instruments. The largest asset class in which fixed maturities were invested was in corporate securities, including commercial, industrial, finance and utility bonds, which represented approximately 57.9%57.8% of fixed maturity securities as of March 31,June 30, 2006 and had an average Standard and Poor's ("S&P") rating of "A-". Within the fixed maturity security portfolio, the Company holds approximately $120.9$137.2 million in asset-backed securities at March 31,June 30, 2006, which include credit card and automobile receivables, home equity loans, manufactured housing bonds and collateralized bond obligations. The Company's asset-backed securities are diversified by issuer and contain both floating and fixed rate securities. In addition to the risks associated with floating rate securities, principal risks in holding asset-backed securities are structural, credit and capital market risks. Structural risks include the securities' priority in the issuer's capital structure, the adequacy of and ability to realize proceeds from collateral, and the potential for prepayments. Credit risks include consumer or corporate credits such as credit card holders, equipment lessees, and corporate obligors. Capital market risks include general level of interest rates and the liquidity for these securities in the marketplace. 23 The Company monitors its fixed maturity securities to determine impairments in value and evaluates factors such as financial condition of the issuer, payment performance, the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been below amortized cost, compliance with covenants, general market conditions and industry sector, current intent and ability to hold securities and various other subjective factors. Based on management's judgment, securities determined to have an other-than-temporary impairment in value are written down to fair value. The Company recorded $0.2 million in other-than-temporary write-downs on fixed maturity securities for the six months ending June 30, 2006. The Company did not record other-than-temporary write-downs on fixed maturity securities for the threesix months ending March 31, 2006 or the three months ending March 31,June 30, 2005. During the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2006, the Company sold fixed maturity securities with a fair value of $284.8$472.1 million, which were below amortized cost, at a loss of $8.8$17.3 million. The following table presents the total gross unrealized losses for 8681,366 fixed maturity securities and equity securities as of March 31,June 30, 2006, where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by the indicated amount (in thousands): 27
AT MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2006 ---------------------------------------------------- Gross Unrealized Losses % of Total -------------------------- ---------- Less than 20% $114,680 100%$181,240 100.0% 20% or more for less than six months -- -- 20% or more for six months or greater -- -- -------- -------- Total $114,680 100%$181,240 100.0% ======== =====
While all of these securities are monitored for potential impairment, the Company's experience indicates that the first two categories do not present as great a risk of impairment, and often, fair values recover over time. These securities have generally been adversely affected by overall economic conditions, primarily an increase in the interest rate environment. 24 The following tables present the estimated fair values and gross unrealized losses for the 8681,366 fixed maturity securities and equity securities that have estimated fair values below amortized cost as of March 31,June 30, 2006. These investments are presented by class and grade of security, as well as the length of time the related market value has remained below amortized cost.
AS OF MARCH 31,JUNE 30, 2006 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN -------------------------------------------------------------------------- LESS THAN 12 MONTHS 12 MONTHS TOTAL ----------------------- ---------------------- ----------------------- Estimated--------------------------- --------------------------- Gross Gross Gross Estimated GrossUnrealized Estimated Gross Fair Unrealized Estimated Fair Unrealized (in thousands) Fair Unrealized Value Loss Value Loss Value Loss ---------- ---------- ----------------------- ---------- -------------- ---------- ---------- (in thousands) INVESTMENT GRADE SECURITIES: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL $1,044,948 $ 955,09847,523 $104,437 $ 35,0296,173 $1,149,385 $ 62,297 $ 3,495 $1,017,395 $ 38,52453,696 PUBLIC UTILITIES 354,309 11,980 3,063 151 357,372 12,131393,914 19,765 10,215 604 404,129 20,369 ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES 75,438 1,893 9,209 141 84,647 2,03472,966 1,927 19,726 641 92,692 2,568 CANADIAN AND CANADIAN PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENTS 100,091 2,057 1,637 49 101,728 2,106129,679 8,720 14,753 314 144,432 9,034 MORTGAGE-BACKED SECURITIES 1,142,796 29,438 122,421 4,359 1,265,217 33,7971,057,637 36,270 202,663 9,734 1,260,300 46,004 FINANCE 665,688 14,798 61,948 2,690 727,636 17,488808,312 25,415 82,704 4,593 891,016 30,008 U.S. GOVERNMENT AND AGENCIES 48,946 396 675 30 49,621 42639,755 552 672 33 40,427 585 STATE AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS 40,703 1,45139,539 2,603 -- -- 40,703 1,45139,539 2,603 FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS 96,324 755 4,314 10 100,638 765185,835 3,239 3,218 59 189,053 3,298 ---------- -------- -------- ------- ---------- -------- INVESTMENT GRADE SECURITIES 3,479,393 97,797 265,564 10,925 3,744,957 108,7223,772,585 146,014 438,388 22,151 4,210,973 168,165 ---------- -------- -------- ------- ---------- -------- NON-INVESTMENT GRADE SECURITIES: COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL 71,425 1,662 1,963 81 73,388 1,743113,872 4,978 1,966 74 115,838 5,052 FINANCE 6,947 311 1,895 146 8,842 4573,625 277 1,939 101 5,564 378 ASSET-BACKED SECURITIES 3,277 22 -- -- 3,277 22 PUBLIC UTILITIES 32,355 1,005 -- -- -- -- PUBLIC UTILITIES 27,256 474 -- -- 27,256 47432,355 1,005 ---------- -------- -------- ------- ---------- -------- NON-INVESTMENT GRADE SECURITIES 105,628 2,447 3,858 227 109,486 2,674153,129 6,282 3,905 175 157,034 6,457 ---------- -------- -------- ------- ---------- -------- TOTAL FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES $3,585,021 $100,244 $269,422 $11,152 $3,854,443 $111,396$3,925,714 $152,296 $442,293 $22,326 $4,368,007 $174,622 ========== ======== ======== ======= ========== ======== EQUITY SECURITIES $ 62,61492,292 $ 1,7904,528 $ 28,29530,738 $ 1,4942,090 $ 90,909123,030 $ 3,2846,618 ========== ======== ======== ======= ========== ========
28 The Company believes that the analysis of each security whose price has been below market for twelve months or longer indicates that the financial strength, liquidity, leverage, future outlook and/or recent management actions support the view that the security was not other-than-temporarily impaired as of March 31,June 30, 2006. The unrealized losses did not exceed 17.5%17.6% on an individual security basis and are primarily a result of rising interest rates, changes in credit spreads and the long-dated maturities of the securities. Additionally, each security whose price has been below market for twelve months or longer is investment grade. The Company's mortgage loan portfolio consists principally of investments in U.S.-based commercial offices and retail locations. The mortgage loan portfolio is diversified by geographic region and property type. All mortgage loans are performing and no valuation allowance has been established as of March 31,June 30, 2006. Policy loans present no credit risk because the amount of the loan cannot exceed the obligation due the ceding company upon the death of the insured or surrender of the underlying policy. The provisions of the treaties in force 25 and the underlying policies determine the policy loan interest rates. Because policy loans represent premature distributions of policy liabilities, they have the effect of reducing future disintermediation risk. In addition, the Company earns a spread between the interest rate earned on policy loans and the interest rate credited to corresponding liabilities. Funds withheld at interest comprised approximately 28.4%27.5% and 27.8% of the Company's cash and invested assets as of March 31,June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. For agreements written on a modified coinsurance basis and certain agreements written on a coinsurance basis, assets equal to the net statutory reserves are withheld and legally owned and managed by the ceding company, and are reflected as funds withheld at interest on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet. In the event of a ceding company's insolvency, the Company would need to assert a claim on the assets supporting its reserve liabilities. However, the risk of loss to the Company is mitigated by its ability to offset amounts it owes the ceding company for claims or allowances with amounts owed to the Company from the ceding company. Interest accrues to these assets at rates defined by the treaty terms. The Company is subject to the investment performance on the withheld assets, although it does not directly control them. These assets are primarily fixed maturity investment securities and pose risks similar to the fixed maturity securities the Company owns. To mitigate this risk, the Company helps set the investment guidelines followed by the ceding company and monitors compliance. Ceding companies with funds withheld at interest had a minimum A.M. Best rating of "A-". Other invested assets represented approximately 1.5%7.7% and 1.9% of the Company's cash and invested assets as of March 31,June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Other invested assets include common stock, preferred stocks, restricted cash and cash equivalents and limited partnership interests. The increase in other invested assets from December 31, 2005 was primarily due to the inclusion of $852.3 million of restricted cash and cash equivalents related to the Company's collateral finance facility at June 30, 2006. The Company did not record an other-than-temporary write-down on its investments in limited partnerships in the second quarter of 2006 or 2005. The Company recorded an other-than-temporary writedownwritedowns of $3.1 million and $1.3 million on its investments in limited partnerships due to losses in the underlying holdings during the first quarter ofsix months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS The following table displays the Company's contractual obligations that have materially changed since December 31, 2005 (in millions):
PAYMENT DUE BY PERIOD ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Less than Contractual Obligations: Total 1 Year 1 - 3 Years 4 - 5 Years After 5 Years - ------------------------ -------------- --------- ----------- ----------- --------------------------- Short-term debt, including interest $103.6 $103.6 $-- $-- $--$ 29.0 $ 29.0 $ -- $ -- $ -- Collateral finance facility, including interest 1,333.3 48.5 97.3 96.9 1,090.6 Life claims payable 931.1 931.1 -- -- -- Operating leases 33.4 6.2 9.4 6.5 11.3 Limited partnerships 46.6 46.6 -- -- -- Mortgage purchase commitments 10.8 10.831.2 31.2 -- -- -- ---------- ------ ----- ----- --------
29 The Company's insurance liabilities, including future policy benefits and interest-sensitive contract liabilities, represent future obligations, where the timing of payment is unknown because the payment depends on an insurable event, such as the death of an insured, or policyholder behavior, such as the surrender or lapse of a policy. These future obligations are established based primarily on actuarial principles and are reflected on the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet, but have been excluded from the table above due to the uncertain timing of payment. 26 MORTALITY RISK MANAGEMENT In the normal course of business, the Company seeks to limit its exposure to loss on any single insured and to recover a portion of benefits paid by ceding reinsurance to other insurance enterprises or reinsurers under excess coverage and coinsurance contracts. In the U.S., the Company retains a maximum of $6.0 million of coverage per individual life. In certain limited situations, due to the acquisition of in-force blocks of business, the Company has retained more than $6.0 million per individual policy. In total, there are 3629 such cases of over-retained policies, for amounts averaging $2.6$3.1 million over the Company's normal retention limit. The largest amount over retained on any one life is $13.1 million. For other countries, particularly those with higher risk factors or smaller books of business, the Company systematically reduces its retention. The Company has a number of retrocession arrangements whereby certain business in force is retroceded on an automatic or facultative basis. Generally, RGA's insurance subsidiaries retrocede amounts in excess of their retention to RGA Reinsurance Company ("RGA Reinsurance"), RGA Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Ltd., or RGA Americas Reinsurance Company, Ltd. Retrocessions are arranged through the Company's retrocession pools for amounts in excess of its retention. The Company also retrocedes most of its financial reinsurance business to other insurance companies to alleviate the strain on statutory surplus created by this business. For a majority of the retrocessionaires that are not rated, letters of credit or trust assets have been given as additional security in favor of RGA Reinsurance. In addition, the Company performs annual financial and in force reviews of its retrocessionaires to evaluate financial stability and performance. The Company has never experienced a material default in connection with retrocession arrangements, nor has it experienced any material difficulty in collecting claims recoverable from retrocessionaires; however, no assurance can be given as to the future performance of such retrocessionaires or as to the recoverability of any such claims. The Company maintains a catastrophe insurance program ("Program") that renews on August 13th of each year. The current Program began August 13, 2005, and covers events involving 10 or more insured deaths from a single occurrence. The Company retains the first $25 million in claims, the Program covers the next $50 million in claims, and the Company retains all claims in excess of $75 million. The Program covers only losses under U.S. guaranteed issue (corporate owned life insurance, bank owned life insurance, etc.) reinsurance programs and includes losses due to acts of terrorism, but excludes losses due to nuclear, chemical and/or biological events. The Program is insured by several insurance companies and Lloyd's Syndicates, with no single entity providing more than $10 million of coverage. COUNTERPARTY RISK In the normal course of business, the Company seeks to limit its exposure to reinsurance contracts by ceding a portion of the reinsurance to other insurance companies or reinsurers. Should a counterparty not be able to fulfill its obligation to the Company under a reinsurance agreement, the impact could be material to the Company's financial condition and results of operations. MARKET RISK Market risk is the risk of loss that may occur when fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates and equity and commodity prices change the value of a financial instrument. Both derivative and nonderivative financial instruments have market risk so the Company's risk management extends beyond derivatives to encompass all financial instruments held that are sensitive to market risk. The Company is primarily exposed to interest rate risk and foreign currency risk. Interest rate risk arises from many of the Company's primary activities, as the Company invests substantial funds in interest-sensitive assets and also has certain interest-sensitive contract liabilities. The Company manages interest rate risk and credit risk to maximize the return on the Company's capital effectively and to preserve the value 30 created by its business operations. As such, certain management monitoring processes are designed to minimize the impact of sudden and sustained changes in interest rates on fair value, cash flows, and net interest income. The Company is subject to foreign currency translation, transaction, and net income exposure. The Company generally does not hedge the foreign currency translation exposure related to its investment in foreign subsidiaries as it views these investments to be long-term. Translation differences resulting from translating foreign subsidiary balances to U.S. dollars are reflected in equity. The Company generally does not hedge the foreign currency 27 exposure of its subsidiaries transacting business in currencies other than their functional currency (transaction exposure). There has been no significant change in the Company's quantitative or qualitative aspects of market risk during the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2006 from that disclosed in the 2005 Annual Report. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS In June, 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation ("FIN") No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109" ("FIN 48"). FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, treatment of interest and penalties, and disclosure of such positions. FIN 48 will be applied prospectively and will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 31, 2006. The Company is currently evaluating the effect, if any, of FIN 48 on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2006, the Company prospectively adopted SFAS No. 155, "Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments" ("SFAS 155"). SFAS 155 amends SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities" ("SFAS 133") and SFAS 140, "Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities." SFAS 155 allows financial instruments that have embedded derivatives to be accounted for as a whole, eliminating the need to bifurcate the derivative from its host, if the holder elects to account for the whole instrument on a fair value basis. In addition, among other changes, SFAS 155 (i) clarifies which interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to the requirements of SFAS 133; (ii) establishes a requirement to evaluate interests in securitized financial assets to identify interests that are freestanding derivatives or that are hybrid financial instruments that contain an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; (iii) clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are not embedded derivatives; and (iv) eliminates the prohibition on a qualifying special-purpose entity ("QSPE") from holding a derivative financial instrument that pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial interest. The adoption of SFAS 155 did not have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements. In June 2005, the FASB cleared SFAS 133 Implementation Issue No. B38, "Embedded Derivatives: Evaluation of Net Settlement with Respect to the Settlement of a Debt Instrument through Exercise of an Embedded Put Option or Call Option" ("Issue B38") and SFAS 133 Implementation Issue No. B39, "Embedded Derivatives: Application of Paragraph 13(b) to Call Options That Are Exercisable Only by the Debtor" ("Issue B39"). Issue B38 clarified that the potential settlement of a debtor's obligation to a creditor occurring upon exercise of a put or call option meets the net settlement criteria of SFAS No. 133. Issue B39 clarified that an embedded call option, in which the underlying is an interest rate or interest rate index, that can accelerate the settlement of a debt host financial instrument should not be bifurcated and fair valued if the right to accelerate the settlement can be exercised only by the debtor (issuer/borrower) and the investor will recover substantially all of its initial net investment. Issues B38 and B39 which must be adopted as of the first day of the first fiscal quarter beginning after December 15, 2005. Issues B38 and B39 were adopted by the Company during the first quarter of 2006 and did not have a material effect on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements. In May 2005, the FASB issued SFAS 154. The statement requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements for correction of errors or a voluntary change in accounting principle unless it is deemed impracticable. It also requires that a change in the method of depreciation, amortization, or depletion for long-lived, non-financial assets be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate rather than a change in accounting principle. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes and corrections of errors made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. SFAS 154 was adopted by the Company during the first quarter of 2006 and did not have a material effect on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements. 31 FORWARD-LOOKING AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, among others, statements relating to projections of the strategies, earnings, revenues, income or loss, ratios, future financial performance, and growth potential of the Company. The words "intend," "expect," "project," "estimate," "predict," "anticipate," "should," "believe," and other similar expressions also are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. Future events and actual results, performance, and achievements could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying the forward-looking statements. Numerous important factors could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements including, without limitation, (1) adverse changes in mortality, morbidity or claims experience, (2) changes in the Company's financial strength and credit ratings or those of MetLife, Inc. ("MetLife"), the beneficial owner of a majority of the Company's common shares, or its subsidiaries, and the effect 28 of such changes on the Company's future results of operations and financial condition, (3) inadequate risk analysis and underwriting, (4) general economic conditions or a prolonged economic downturn affecting the demand for insurance and reinsurance in the Company's current and planned markets, (5) the availability and cost of collateral necessary for regulatory reserves and capital, (6) market or economic conditions that adversely affect the Company's ability to make timely sales of investment securities, (7) risks inherent in the Company's risk management and investment strategy, including changes in investment portfolio yields due to interest rate or credit quality changes, (8) fluctuations in U.S. or foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, or securities and real estate markets, (9) adverse litigation or arbitration results, (10) the adequacy of reserves, resources and accurate information relating to settlements, awards and terminated and discontinued lines of business, (11) the stability of and actions by governments and economies in the markets in which the Company operates, (12) competitive factors and competitors' responses to the Company's initiatives, (13) the success of the Company's clients, (14) successful execution of the Company's entry into new markets, (15) successful development and introduction of new products and distribution opportunities, (16) the Company's ability to successfully integrate and operate reinsurance business that the Company acquires, (17) regulatory action that may be taken by state Departments of Insurance with respect to the Company, MetLife, or its subsidiaries, (18) the Company's dependence on third parties, including those insurance companies and reinsurers to which the Company cedes some reinsurance, third-party investment managers and others, (19) the threat of natural disasters, catastrophes, terrorist attacks, epidemics or pandemics anywhere in the world where the Company or its clients do business, (20) changes in laws, regulations, and accounting standards applicable to the Company, its subsidiaries, or its business, (21) the effect of the Company's status as an insurance holding company and regulatory restrictions on its ability to pay principal of and interest on its debt obligations, and (22) other risks and uncertainties described in this document and in the Company's other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). Forward-looking statements should be evaluated together with the many risks and uncertainties that affect the Company's business, including those mentioned in this document and the cautionary statements described in the periodic reports the Company files with the SEC. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which they are made. The Company does not undertake any obligations to update these forward-looking statements, even though the Company's situation may change in the future. The Company qualifies all of its forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements, you are advised to see Item 1A Risk Factors of the 2005 Annual Report. ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK See "Item 2 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Market Risk" which is included herein. ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. 32 There was no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) during the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2006, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting. PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Company is currently a party to three arbitrations that involve its discontinued accident and health business, including personal accident business (which includes London market excess of loss business) and workers' compensation carve-out business. The Company is also party to one pending and one threatened arbitration related to its life reinsurance business. In addition, the Company has been joined in a suit filed against one of its ceding companies alleging wrongful denial of a life insurance claim. As of March 31,June 30, 2006, the parties involved in these actions have raised claims, or established reserves that may result in claims, in the amount of $32.0 million, which is $27.6$27.9 million in excess of the amounts held in reserve by the Company. The Company generally has little 29 information regarding any reserves established by the ceding companies, and must rely on management estimates to establish policy claim liabilities. It is possible that any such reserves could be increased in the future. The Company believes it has substantial defenses upon which to contest these claims, including but not limited to misrepresentation and breach of contract by direct and indirect ceding companies. See Note 20, "Discontinued Operations" in the Company's 2005 Annual Report for more information. Additionally, from time to time, the Company is subject to litigation related to employment-related matters in the normal course of its business. While it is not feasible to predict or determine the ultimate outcome of the pending litigation or arbitrations or provide reasonable ranges of potential losses, it is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that their outcomes, after consideration of the provisions made in the Company's consolidated financial statements, would not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position. However, it is possible that an adverse outcome could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on the Company's consolidated net income or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods. ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company's 2005 Annual Report. ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS Under a Board of Directors approved plan, the Company may purchase at its discretion up to $50 million of its common stock on the open market. As of March 31,June 30, 2006, the Company had purchased 225,500 shares of treasury stock under this program at an aggregate price of $6.6 million. All purchases were made during 2002. The Company generally uses treasury shares to support the future exercise of options granted under its stock option plans. ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS The Company's Annual Meeting of Shareholders was held on May 24, 2006. At the Annual Meeting, the following proposal was voted upon by the shareholders as indicated below: Election of the following Directors:
DIRECTORS VOTED FOR WITHHELD - --------- ---------- ---------- Stuart I. Greenbaum 54,431,121 1,050,670 Leland C. Launer, Jr. 43,888,273 11,593,518 Georgette A. Piligian 43,825,198 11,656,593
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS See index to exhibits. 3033 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated By: /s/ A. Greig Woodring ------------------------------------August 4, 2006 ---------------------------------------- A. Greig Woodring President & Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) May 5, 2006 By: /s/ Jack B. Lay ------------------------------------August 4, 2006 ---------------------------------------- Jack B. Lay Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) May 5, 2006 3134 INDEX TO EXHIBITS
Exhibit Number Description - ------- ----------- 3.1 Restated Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 30, 2004. 3.2 Bylaws of RGA, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2004. 10.1 Amendment No.2 dated as of June 22, 2006 to Credit Agreement dated as of September 29, 2005 among RGA and certain subsidiaries, as Account Parties, the financial institutions listed on the signature pages thereof, The Bank of New York, as Administrative Agent; Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent; and KeyBank National Association, Wachovia Bank, National Association, and Deutsche Bank, AG New York Branch, as Co-Documentation Agents. 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
3235