UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008



o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 1-11848

REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)


MISSOURI		~~43-1627032~~
(State or other jurisdiction		~~(IRS employer~~
of incorporation or organization)		43-1627032 (IRS employer identification number)

1370 Timberlake Manor Parkway
Chesterfield, Missouri 63017
(Address of principal executive offices)
(636) 736-7000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yesþ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a ~~non-accelerated filer.~~smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

~~Large accelerated filer~~þ
Large accelerated filerþ Accelerated filero~~Non-accelerated filer~~o Non-accelerated filero Smaller reporting companyo
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). YesoNoþ

Common stock outstanding ($.01 par value) as of ~~October 31, 2007: 62,001,463~~April 30, 2008: 62,281,408 shares.

REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)


	September 30,			December 31,			March 31,			December 31,
	2007			2006			2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Assets
Fixed maturity securities:
Available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost of $8,605,635 and $7,867,932 at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively)	$	8,933,291		$	8,372,173
Available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost of $9,139,814 and $8,916,692 at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively)							$	9,387,094		$	9,397,916
Mortgage loans on real estate		827,298			735,618			812,539			831,557
Policy loans		1,018,215			1,015,394			1,039,464			1,059,439
Funds withheld at interest		4,653,590			4,129,078			4,650,948			4,749,496
Short-term investments		153,757			140,281			46,336			75,062
Other invested assets		274,914			220,356			389,437			284,220

Total investments		15,861,065			14,612,900			16,325,818			16,397,690
Cash and cash equivalents		451,027			160,428			304,083			404,351
Accrued investment income		121,510			68,292			103,755			77,537
Premiums receivable and other reinsurance balances		763,599			695,307			766,970			717,228
Reinsurance ceded receivables		688,821			563,570			758,977			722,313
Deferred policy acquisition costs		3,076,574			2,808,053			3,369,316			3,161,951
Other assets		136,751			128,287			183,589			116,939

Total assets	$	21,099,347		$	19,036,837		$	21,812,508		$	21,598,009


Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Future policy benefits	$	6,127,566		$	5,315,428		$	6,449,039		$	6,333,177
Interest sensitive contract liabilities		6,564,305			6,212,278
Interest-sensitive contract liabilities								6,657,546			6,657,061
Other policy claims and benefits		2,050,378			1,826,831			2,196,089			2,055,274
Other reinsurance balances		141,635			145,926			240,137			201,614
Deferred income taxes		635,575			828,848			707,963			760,633
Other liabilities		604,144			177,490			567,854			465,358
Short-term debt		30,710			29,384			—			29,773
Long-term debt		895,992			676,165			925,893			896,065
Collateral finance facility		850,256			850,402			850,210			850,361
Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust holding solely junior subordinated debentures of the Company		158,819			158,701			158,904			158,861

Total liabilities		18,059,380			16,221,453			18,753,635			18,408,177

Commitments and contingent liabilities (See Note 5)
Commitments and contingent liabilities (See Note 7)

Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock (par value $.01 per share; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding)		—			—			—			—
Common stock (par value $.01 per share; 140,000,000 shares authorized; 63,128,273 shares issued at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006)		631			631
Common stock (par value $.01 per share; 140,000,000 shares authorized; 63,128,273 shares issued at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007)								631			631
Warrants		66,915			66,915			66,915			66,915
Additional paid-in-capital		1,094,966			1,081,433			1,112,977			1,103,956
Retained earnings		1,482,970			1,307,743			1,556,127			1,540,122
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
Accumulated currency translation adjustment, net of income taxes		238,267			109,067			203,662			221,987
Unrealized appreciation of securities, net of income taxes		217,961			335,581			167,174			313,170
Pension and postretirement benefits, net of income taxes		(11,849	)		(11,297	)		(8,199	)		(8,351	)

Total stockholders’ equity before treasury stock		3,089,861			2,890,073			3,099,287			3,238,430
Less treasury shares held of 1,129,184 and 1,717,722 at cost at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively		(49,894	)		(74,689	)
Less treasury shares held of 893,575 and 1,096,775 at cost at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively								(40,414	)		(48,598	)

Total stockholders’ equity		3,039,967			2,815,384			3,058,873			3,189,832

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	21,099,347		$	19,036,837		$	21,812,508		$	21,598,009

REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2007			2006			2007			2006			2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)												(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
Revenues
Revenues:
Net premiums	$	1,227,907		$	1,076,191		$	3,561,003		$	3,145,236		$	1,298,065		$	1,125,450
Investment income, net of related expenses		190,458			183,357			681,103			538,903			199,526			215,743
Investment related losses, net		(9,138	)		(125	)		(24,714	)		(4,807	)		(155,260	)		(5,646	)
Change in value of embedded derivatives		(52,975	)		4,272			(57,263	)		(2,251	)
Other revenues		22,089			18,788			61,637			47,035			17,936			19,102

Total revenues		1,378,341			1,282,483			4,221,766			3,724,116			1,360,267			1,354,649
Benefits and Expenses:
Claims and other policy benefits		1,006,864			846,908			2,890,012			2,532,952			1,119,512			902,810
Interest credited		30,475			43,582			205,193			149,843			73,897			61,066
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses		178,244			188,731			542,679			513,235			16,262			182,981
Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives		(39,163	)		2,886			(42,601	)		(2,339	)
Other operating expenses		57,284			54,568			169,325			146,925			63,340			55,422
Interest expense		9,860			15,103			53,545			46,884			23,094			20,453
Collateral finance facility expense		13,047			13,136			38,940			13,413			7,474			12,687

Total benefits and expenses		1,256,611			1,164,914			3,857,093			3,400,913			1,303,579			1,235,419
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		121,730			117,569			364,673			323,203			56,688			119,230
Provision for income taxes		40,932			41,995			127,901			113,260			20,099			42,293

Income from continuing operations		80,798			75,574			236,772			209,943			36,589			76,937
Discontinued operations:
Loss from discontinued accident and health operations, net of income taxes		(4,277	)		(1,539	)		(6,524	)		(3,207	)		(5,084	)		(685	)

Net income	$	76,521		$	74,035		$	230,248		$	206,736		$	31,505		$	76,252


Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.30		$	1.23		$	3.83		$	3.43		$	0.59		$	1.25
Discontinued operations		(0.07	)		(0.02	)		(0.10	)		(0.05	)		(0.08	)		(0.01	)

Net income	$	1.23		$	1.21		$	3.73		$	3.38		$	0.51		$	1.24


Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations	$	1.26		$	1.20		$	3.69		$	3.34		$	0.57		$	1.20
Discontinued operations		(0.07	)		(0.03	)		(0.10	)		(0.05	)		(0.08	)		(0.01	)

Net income	$	1.19		$	1.17		$	3.59		$	3.29		$	0.49		$	1.19


Dividends declared per share	$	0.09		$	0.09		$	0.27		$	0.27		$	0.09		$	0.09

REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Nine months ended
	September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2007			2006			2008			2007
	(Dollars in thousands)						(Dollars in thousands)
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$	230,248		$	206,736		$	31,505		$	76,252
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Change in:
Accrued investment income		(52,044	)		(40,120	)		(26,493	)		(23,467	)
Premiums receivable and other reinsurance balances		(38,713	)		(37,955	)		(49,386	)		38,673
Deferred policy acquisition costs		(173,596	)		(197,550	)		(204,731	)		(30,186	)
Reinsurance ceded balances		(125,251	)		(9,889	)		(36,664	)		(16,657	)
Future policy benefits, other policy claims and benefits, and other reinsurance balances		641,536			455,242			330,732			183,149
Deferred income taxes		25,198			97,806			43,762			37,264
Other assets and other liabilities, net								(48,290	)		17,056
Amortization of net investment premiums, discounts and other								(23,199	)		(9,551	)
Investment related losses, net								155,260			5,646
Loss on reinsurance embedded derivative								14,347			—
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangement		(2,832	)		—			(3,547	)		(1,387	)
Other assets and other liabilities, net		110,478			48,957
Amortization of net investment discounts and other		(54,321	)		(40,525	)
Investment related losses, net		24,714			4,807
Other, net		15,720			2,991			5,219			8,306

Net cash provided by operating activities		601,137			490,500			188,515			285,098

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Sales of fixed maturity securities - available for sale		1,886,028			1,216,753
Maturities of fixed maturity securities - available for sale		109,806			78,042
Purchases of fixed maturity securities - available for sale		(2,336,861	)		(2,604,214	)
Sales of fixed maturity securities available-for-sale								575,587			465,349
Maturities of fixed maturity securities available-for-sale								53,521			37,556
Purchases of fixed maturity securities available-for-sale								(832,146	)		(795,437	)
Cash invested in mortgage loans on real estate		(141,320	)		(73,567	)		—			(27,023	)
Cash invested in policy loans		(8,750	)		(8,581	)
Cash invested in funds withheld at interest		(69,705	)		(43,871	)		(26,946	)		(23,114	)
Net increase in securitized lending activities		62,589			88,618
Net increase on securitized lending activities								21,267			47,548
Principal payments on mortgage loans on real estate		44,392			51,543			18,799			11,147
Principal payments on policy loans		5,929			31,739			19,975			47
Change in short-term investments and other invested assets		(95,560	)		96,421			(76,318	)		(98,434	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(543,452	)		(1,167,117	)		(246,261	)		(382,361	)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Dividends to stockholders		(16,676	)		(16,517	)		(5,585	)		(5,530	)
Proceeds from long-term debt issuance		295,311			—			—			295,311
Principal payments on debt		—			(100,000	)
Net repayments under credit agreements		(78,871	)		—			—			(30,000	)
Net proceeds from collateral finance facility		—			837,500
Purchases of treasury stock		(3,611	)		—			(3,093	)		(3,611	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangement		2,832			—			3,547			1,387
Exercise of stock options, net		12,544			7,582			1,489			4,093
Excess deposits on universal life and other investment type policies and contracts		15,089			64,755
Net change in payables for securities sold under agreements to repurchase								31,912			—
Excess payments on universal life and other investment type policies and contracts								(70,750	)		(10,363	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		226,618			793,320
Effect of exchange rate changes		6,296			(811	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities								(42,480	)		251,287
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash								(42	)		770

Change in cash and cash equivalents		290,599			115,892			(100,268	)		154,794
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		160,428			128,692			404,351			160,428

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	451,027		$	244,584		$	304,083		$	315,222


Supplementary information:
Cash paid for interest	$	78,119		$	51,805		$	20,824		$	16,902
Cash paid (received) for income taxes, net of refunds	$	20,821		$	(12,980	)
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds							$	12,095		$	2,107

REINSURANCE GROUP OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated (“RGA”) and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”) have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the ~~nine-month~~three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s ~~2006~~2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K (“~~2006~~2007 Annual Report”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February ~~26, 2007.~~28, 2008.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company has reclassified the presentation of certain prior-period information to conform to the ~~2007~~2008 presentation.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. In compliance with SFAS No. 157, the Company has categorized its financial instruments, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three level hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3).

If the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the category level is based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

In accordance with SFAS 157, assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the condensed consolidated balance sheets are categorized as follows:

	Level 1.	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

	Level 2.	Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities other than quoted prices in Level 1; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assts or liabilities.

	Level 3.	Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation.

See Note 5 — “Fair Value Disclosures” for further details on the Company’s assets and liabilities recorded at fair value as of March 31, 2008.

5. Fair Value Disclosures

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, which defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. SFAS 157, among other things, requires the Company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The Company’s adoption of SFAS 157 resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $3.9 million, included in interest credited, related primarily to the decrease in the fair value of liability embedded derivatives associated with equity-indexed annuity products primarily from the incorporation of nonperformance risk, also referred to as the Company’s own credit risk, into the fair value calculation.

SFAS 157 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. SFAS 157 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:


Level 1		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include investment securities and derivative contracts that are traded in exchange markets.

Level 2		Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include investment securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments and derivative contracts whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category primarily includes U.S. and foreign corporate securities, Canadian and Canadian provincial government securities, and residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, among others. Most of these securities are valued based on prices provided by third party pricing services with inputs that are market observable.

Level 3		Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the related assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. For invested assets, this category generally includes U.S. and foreign corporate securities (primarily private placements), asset-backed securities (including those with exposure to subprime mortgages), and to a lesser extent, certain residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities, among others. Certain investment securities are priced via independent, non-binding, broker quotes which utilize inputs that may be difficult to corroborate with observable market data. Such securities are classified in Level 3. Additionally, the Company’s embedded derivatives, all of which are associated with reinsurance treaties, are classified in Level 3 since their values include significant unobservable inputs associated with actuarial assumptions regarding policyholder behavior. Embedded derivatives are reported with the host instruments on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

As required by SFAS 157, when inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. For example, a Level 3 fair value measurement may include inputs that are observable (Levels 1 and 2) and unobservable (Level 3). Therefore, gains and losses for such assets and liabilities categorized within Level 3 may include changes in fair value that are attributable to both observable inputs (Levels 1 and 2) and unobservable inputs (Level 3).

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below(dollars in thousands).

March 31, 2008
Fair Value Measurements Using:
Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3

Assets:
Fixed maturity securities — available-for-sale:
U.S. corporate securities $ 3,313,092 $ — $ 2,487,590 $ 825,502
Canadian and Canadian provincial governments 2,113,830 — 2,087,069 26,761
Residential mortgage-backed securities 1,325,631 — 1,235,210 90,421
Foreign corporate securities 1,081,715 1,895 985,762 94,058
Asset-backed securities 446,031 — 114,375 331,656
Commercial mortgage-backed securities 686,678 — 628,144 58,534
U.S. government and agencies securities 3,656 3,497 159 —
State and political subdivision securities 64,074 7,692 — 56,382
Other foreign government securities 352,387 117,128 209,407 25,852

Total fixed maturity securities — available-for-sale 9,387,094 130,212 7,747,716 1,509,166
Funds withheld at interest — embedded derivatives (233,618 ) — — (233,618 )
Other invested assets — equity securities 163,721 113,748 29,771 20,202
Other invested assets — derivatives 10,243 — 10,243 —
Reinsurance ceded receivable — embedded derivatives 78,216 — — 78,216

Total $ 9,405,656 $ 243,960 $ 7,787,730 $ 1,373,966

Liabilities:
Interest sensitive contract liabilities — embedded derivatives $ (585,572 ) $ — $ — $ (585,572 )
Other liabilities — derivatives (301 ) — (301 ) —

Total $ (585,873 ) $ — $ (301 ) $ (585,572 )

The table below presents a reconciliation for all assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the three months ended March 31, 2008(dollars in thousands).

Total Fair Value Measurements for the three months ended March 31, 2008
Total gains/losses
(realized/unrealized) included in:
Purchases,
Balance Other issuances Transfers Balance
January 1, comprehensive and in and/or March 31,
2008 Earnings income disposals out of Level 3 2008

Assets:
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale $ 1,500,054 $ (7,110 ) $ (36,121 ) $ 71,283 $ (18,940 ) $ 1,509,166
Funds withheld at interest — embedded derivatives (85,090 ) (148,528 ) — — — (233,618 )
Other invested assets — equity securities 13,950 1 (479 ) 6,730 — 20,202
Reinsurance ceded receivable — embedded derivatives 68,298 6,045 — 3,873 — 78,216

Total $ 1,497,212 $ (149,592 ) $ (36,600 ) $ 81,886 $ (18,940 ) $ 1,373,966

Liabilities:
Interest sensitive contract liabilities — embedded derivatives $ (531,160 ) $ (43,678 ) $ — $ (10,734 ) $ — $ (585,572 )

Total $ (531,160 ) $ (43,678 ) $ — $ (10,734 ) $ — $ (585,572 )

The table below summarizes gains and losses due to changes in fair value, including both realized and unrealized gains and losses, recorded in earnings for Level 3 assets and liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 2008(dollars in thousands).

Total Gains and Losses
Classification of gains/losses (realized/unrealized) included in earnings for the three months
ended March 31, 2008
Policy
acquisition
Investment Investment Claims costs and
income, net related & other other
of related gains Other policy insurance
expenses (losses), net revenues benefits Interest credited expenses Total

Assets:
Fixed maturity
securities —
available-for-sale $ (188 ) $ (6,922 ) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ (7,110 )
Funds withheld at interest — embedded derivatives — (148,528 ) — — — — (148,528 )
Other invested assets — equity securities 1 — — — — — 1
Reinsurance ceded receivable — embedded derivatives — — — — — 6,045 6,045

Total $ (187 ) $ (155,450 ) $ — $ — $ — $ 6,045 $ (149,592 )

Liabilities:
Interest sensitive contract liabilities — embedded derivatives $ — $ (6,487 ) $ — $ 451 $ (37,642 ) $ — $ (43,678 )

Total $ — $ (6,487 ) $ — $ 451 $ (37,642 ) $ — $ (43,678 )

The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains or losses recorded in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2008 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that are still held at March 31, 2008(dollars in thousands).

Changes in Unrealized Gains and Losses
Changes in unrealized gains/losses relating to assets and liabilities still held at the reporting
date for the three months ended March 31, 2008
Policy
acquisition
Investment Investment Claims costs
income, net related & other and other
of related gains Other policy Interest insurance
expenses (losses), net revenues benefits credited expenses Total
Assets:
Fixed maturity securities — available-for-sale $ (198 ) $ (1,979 ) $ — $ — $ — $ — $ (2,177 )
Funds withheld at interest — embedded derivatives — (148,528 ) — — — — (148,528 )
Other invested assets — equity securities 1 — — — — — 1
Reinsurance ceded receivable — embedded derivatives — — — — — 7,811 7,811

Total $ (197 ) $ (150,507 ) $ — $ — $ — $ 7,811 $ (142,893 )

Liabilities:
Interest sensitive contract liabilities — embedded derivatives $ — $ (6,487 ) $ — $ 71 $ (53,245 ) $ — $ (59,661 )

Total $ — $ (6,487 ) $ — $ 71 $ (53,245 ) $ — $ (59,661 )

4.6. Segment Information

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements accompanying the ~~2006~~2007 Annual Report. The Company measures segment performance primarily based on profit or loss from operations before income taxes. There are no intersegment reinsurance transactions and the Company does not have any material long-lived assets other than internally developed software. Investment income is allocated to the segments based upon average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes.

The Company allocates capital to its segments based on an internally developed risk capital model, the purpose of which is to measure the risk in the business and to provide a basis upon which capital is deployed. The economic capital model considers the unique and specific nature of the risks inherent in the Company’s businesses. As a result of the economic capital allocation process, a portion of investment income and investment related gains ~~(losses)~~and losses are credited to the segments based on the level of allocated equity. In addition, the segments are charged for excess capital utilized above the allocated economic capital basis. This charge is included in policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses.

Information related to total revenues, income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes, and total assets of the Company for each reportable segment are summarized below(dollars in thousands).

Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
2007 2006 2007 2006

Total revenues

U.S. $ 764,724 $ 791,050 $ 2,531,787 $ 2,338,989
Canada 157,447 131,861 442,925 377,599
Europe & South Africa 175,437 150,094 520,156 448,349
Asia Pacific 251,348 186,783 658,270 511,580
Corporate & Other 29,385 22,695 68,628 47,599

Total $ 1,378,341 $ 1,282,483 $ 4,221,766 $ 3,724,116

~~2007~~March 31, 2008 and December 31, ~~2006,~~2007, there were approximately ~~$21.5~~$24.0 million and ~~$19.4~~$22.6 million, respectively, of outstanding bank letters of credit in favor of third parties. Additionally, the Company utilizes letters of credit to secure reserve credits when it retrocedes business to its offshore subsidiaries, including RGA Americas Reinsurance Company, Ltd., ~~and~~ RGA Reinsurance Company (Barbados) Ltd. and RGA Worldwide Reinsurance Company, Ltd. The Company cedes business to its offshore affiliates to help reduce the amount of regulatory capital required in certain jurisdictions, such as the U.S. and the United Kingdom. The capital required to support the business in the offshore affiliates reflects more realistic expectations than the original jurisdiction of the business, where capital requirements are often considered to be quite conservative. As of ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 and December 31, ~~2006, $360.3~~2007, $411.6 million and ~~$437.7~~$459.6 million, respectively, in letters of credit from various banks were outstanding between the various subsidiaries of the Company. ~~On September 24, 2007 the~~The Company ~~entered into~~maintains a ~~five-year,~~ syndicated revolving credit facility with an overall capacity of $750.0 million, ~~replacing its $600.0 million five-year revolving credit facility,~~ which ~~was~~is scheduled to mature in September ~~2010.~~2012. The Company may borrow cash and may obtain letters of credit in multiple currencies under ~~the new~~this facility. As of ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, the Company had ~~$305.0~~$358.0 million in issued, but undrawn, letters of credit under this ~~new~~ facility, which is included in the total above. Applicable letter of credit fees and fees payable for the credit facility depend upon the Company’s senior unsecured long-term debt rating. Fees associated with the Company’s other letters of credit are not fixed for periods in excess of one year and are based on the Company’s ratings and the general availability of these instruments in the marketplace.

RGA has issued guarantees to third parties on behalf of its subsidiaries’ performance for the payment of amounts due under certain credit facilities, reinsurance treaties and an office lease ~~obligations,~~obligation, whereby if a subsidiary fails to meet an obligation, RGA or one of its other subsidiaries will make a payment to fulfill the obligation. In limited circumstances, treaty guarantees are granted to ceding companies in order to provide them additional security, particularly in cases where RGA’s subsidiary is relatively new, unrated, or not of a significant size. Liabilities supported by the treaty guarantees, before consideration for any legally offsetting amounts due from the guaranteed party, totaled ~~$314.8~~$324.9 million and ~~$276.5~~$325.1 million as of ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 and December 31, ~~2006,~~2007, respectively, and are reflected on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets in future policy benefits. Potential guaranteed amounts of future payments will vary depending on production levels and underwriting results. Guarantees related to trust preferred securities and credit facilities provide additional security to third parties should a subsidiary fail to make principal and/or interest payments when due. As of ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, RGA’s exposure related to these guarantees was ~~$158.8~~$158.9 million.

In addition, the Company indemnifies its directors and officers as provided in its charters and by-laws. Since this indemnity generally is not subject to limitation with respect to duration or amount, the Company does not believe that it is possible to determine the maximum potential amount due under this indemnity in the future.

6.8. Employee Benefit Plans

The components of net periodic benefit costs were as follows(dollars in thousands):

Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
2007 2006 2007 2006

Net periodic pension benefit cost:

Service cost $ 806 $ 518 $ 2,077 $ 1,555
Interest cost 424 425 1,274 1,273
Expected return on plan assets (469 ) (379 ) (1,407 ) (1,137 )
Amortization of prior service cost 70 7 244 22
Amortization of prior actuarial (gain) loss 51 91 120 275

Net periodic pension benefit cost $ 882 $ 662 $ 2,308 $ 1,988

Three months ended March 31,
Pension Benefits Other Benefits
2008 2007 2008 2007

Determination of net periodic benefit cost:

Service cost $ 819 $ 799 $ 158 $ 206
Interest cost 586 592 145 190
Expected rate of return on plan assets (469 ) (455 ) — —
Amortization of prior service cost 7 95 — —
Amortization of prior actuarial loss 72 113 35 84

Net periodic benefit cost $ 1,015 $ 1,144 $ 338 $ 480

The Company made no pension contributions during the first quarter of 2008 and expects to make total contributions of approximately $2.0 million in 2008.

912

Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
2007 2006 2007 2006

Net periodic other benefits cost:

Service cost $ 71 $ 156 $ 214 $ 515
Interest cost 135 163 404 474
Expected return on plan assets — — — —
Amortization of prior service cost 7 — 19 —
Amortization of prior actuarial (gain) loss 40 77 122 209

Net periodic other benefits cost $ 253 $ 396 $ 759 $ 1,198

~~The Company made $1.9 million in pension contributions during the second quarter of 2007 and expects this to be the only contribution for the year.~~

~~7. Financing Activities~~

On September 24, 2007 the Company entered into a five-year, syndicated revolving credit facility with an overall capacity of $750.0 million, replacing its $600.0 million five-year revolving credit facility, which was scheduled to mature in September 2010. The Company may borrow cash and may obtain letters of credit in multiple currencies under the new facility. The credit facility may be increased, at the Company’s election, to provide for up to an additional $100 million of borrowings and letters of credit. Interest on borrowings is based either on the prime, federal funds or LIBOR rates plus a base rate margin defined in the agreement. Fees payable for the credit facility depend upon the Company’s senior unsecured long-term debt rating. As of September 30, 2007, the Company had no cash borrowings outstanding and $305.0 million in issued, but undrawn, letters of credit under this new facility. The credit agreement is unsecured but contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants customary for financings of this type.

On March 6, 2007, RGA issued 5.625% Senior Notes due March 15, 2017 with a face amount of $300.0 million. These senior notes have been registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The net proceeds from the offering were approximately $295.3 million, a portion of which were used to pay down $50.0 million of indebtedness under a U.S. bank credit facility. The remaining net proceeds are designated for general corporate purposes. Capitalized issue costs were approximately $2.6 million.

8.9. Equity Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (“SFAS”) No. 123(r), “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(r)”). SFAS 123(r) requires that the cost of all share-based transactions be recorded in the financial statements. The Company has been recording compensation cost for all equity-based grants or awards after January 1, 2003 consistent with the requirement of SFAS No. 123 “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, as amended by SFAS 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure — An Amendment of SFAS No. 123”. Equity compensation expense was ~~$3.8~~$5.4 million and ~~$4.5 million in the third quarter of 2007 and 2006, respectively, and $13.3 million and $15.2~~$6.6 million in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2007~~2008 and ~~2006,~~2007, respectively. In the first quarter of ~~2007,~~2008, the Company granted ~~0.3~~0.4 million incentive stock options at ~~$59.63~~$56.03 weighted average per share and ~~0.1~~0.2 million performance contingent units (“PCUs”) to employees. Additionally, non-employee directors were granted a total of 4,800 shares of common stock. As of ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, 1.8 million share options at $32.41 weighted average per share were vested and exercisable with a remaining weighted average exercise period of 4.1 years. As of March 31, 2008, the total compensation cost of non-vested awards not yet recognized in the financial statements was ~~$15.9 million with various recognition periods~~$23.9 million. It is estimated that these costs will vest over ~~the next five~~a weighted average period of 2.1 years.

9.10. New Accounting Standards

~~Effective January 1, 2007~~In March 2008, the ~~Company adopted~~ Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ~~Interpretation (“FIN”)~~issued SFAS No. ~~48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes~~161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities — ~~an interpretation~~An Amendment of FASB Statement No. ~~109”~~133” (“~~FIN 48”~~SFAS 161”). ~~FIN 48 clarifies the accounting~~SFAS 161 requires enhanced qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for ~~uncertainty~~using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of and gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in ~~income tax recognized in a company’s~~derivative agreements. SFAS 161 is effective for financial statements. FIN 48 requires companies to determine whether it is “more likely than not” that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities before any part of the benefit can be recorded in

~~the financial statements. It also provides guidance on the recognition, measurement~~statements issued for fiscal years and classification of income tax uncertainties, along with any related interest and penalties. Previously recorded income tax benefits that no longer meet this standard are required to be charged to earnings in the period that such determination is made.

As a result of implementation of FIN 48, the Company recognized a $17.3 million increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits, a $5.3 million increase in the interest liability for unrecognized tax benefits, and a corresponding reduction to the January 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings of $22.6 million. The Company’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits upon adoption of FIN 48 was $196.3 million.interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company reclassified, at adoption, $9.1 million of current tax liabilities to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits. The Company also reclassified, at adoption, $169.9 million of deferred income tax liabilities to the liability for unrecognized tax benefits for tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is ~~highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of~~currently evaluating the impact of deferred tax accounting, other than interest and penalties, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of January 1, 2007 that would affect the effective tax rate if recognized was $26.4 million. The Company also had $29.8 million of accrued interest, as of January 1, 2007. The Company classifies interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense, while penalties are included within income tax expense.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and non U.S. jurisdictions. With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2003.

As of September 30, 2007, the Company’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $196.3 million, which is unchanged from the amount recorded as of the date of adoption. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefit included that would affect the effective tax rate, if recognized, was approximately $25.7 million, a decrease of approximately $0.7 million from the amount recorded as of the date of adoption. The net decrease was primarily due to tax issues that were effectively settled in the current quarter. As a result of these settlements, items within the liability for unrecognized tax benefits were reclassified to current and deferred taxes, as applicable.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits and unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 is as follows:

Unrecognized Tax Benefits That,
Total Unrecognized If Recognized Would Affect the
(dollars in millions) Tax Benefits Effective Tax Rate

Balance at January 1, 2007 (date of adoption) $ 196.3 $ 26.4
Additions for tax positions of prior years — —
Reductions for tax positions of prior years (5.8 ) (6.5 )
Additions for tax positions of current year 5.8 5.8
Reductions for tax positions of current year — —
Settlements with tax authorities — —

Balance at September 30, 2007 $ 196.3 $ 25.7

During the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recognized a decrease of $9.4 million and $0.7 million, respectively, in interest expense. As of September 30, 2007, the Company had $29.1 million of accrued interest related to unrecognized tax benefits. The net decrease of approximately $0.7 million from the date of adoption resulted from the resolution of effectively settled tax issues in the current quarter.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 06-5. This issue, titled “Accounting for the Purchases of Life Insurance - Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4”, clarified that the amount of the DAC receivable beyond one year generally must be discounted to present value under Accounting Principles Board

~~Opinion 21. The adoption of EITF Issue 06-05 did not have a material impact~~SFAS 161 on ~~the Company’s~~its condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~Effective January 1, 2007,~~In February 2008, the ~~Company adopted Statement~~FASB issued Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 140-3, “Accounting for Transfers of ~~Position~~Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions” (“~~SOP”) 05-1, “Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts” (“SOP 05-1”~~FSP 140-3”). ~~SOP 05-1~~FSP 140-3 provides guidance ~~on accounting by insurance enterprises~~ for ~~DAC on internal replacements~~evaluating whether to account for a transfer of ~~insurance~~a financial asset and investment contracts other than those specifically described in SFAS No. 97, “Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Long-Duration Contracts and for Realized Gains and Losses from the Sale of Investments”. SOP 05-1 defines an internal replacementrepurchase financing as a ~~modification in product benefits, features, rights,~~single transaction or ~~coverages that occurs by the exchange of a contract for a new contract, or by amendment, endorsement, or rider to a contract, or by the election of a feature or coverage within a contract. SOP 05-1~~as two separate transactions. FSP 140-3 is effective prospectively for ~~internal replacements occurring in~~financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of FSP 140-3 on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations — A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 141” (“SFAS 141(r)”) and SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — An Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 141(r) establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures certain items in a business combination, as well as disclosures about the nature and financial effects of a business combination. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards surrounding noncontrolling interest, or minority interests, which are the portions of equity in a subsidiary not attributable, directly or indirectly, to a parent. The pronouncements are effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, ~~2006. In addition, in February 2007,~~2008 and apply prospectively to business combinations. Presentation and disclosure requirements related to noncontrolling interests must be retrospectively applied. The Company is currently evaluating the ~~American Institute~~impact of ~~Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) issued related Technical Practice Aids (“TPAs”) to provide further clarification~~SFAS 141(r) on its accounting for future acquisitions and the impact of ~~SOP 05-1. The TPAs are effective concurrently with the adoption of the SOP. The adoption of SOP 05-1 and related TPAs did not have a material impact~~SFAS 160 on ~~the Company’s~~its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits all entities the option to measure most financial instruments and certain other items at fair value at specified election dates and to report related unrealized gains and losses in earnings. The fair value option will generally be applied on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is generally an irrevocable election. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company ~~is evaluating which eligible financial instruments, if any, it will~~did not elect to ~~account for at~~apply the fair value option available under SFAS 159 ~~and the related impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated~~for any of its eligible financial ~~statements.~~

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. The pronouncement is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The guidance in SFAS 157 will be applied prospectively with certain exceptions. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of SFAS 157 on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.instruments.

1213

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Overview

The Company’s primary business is life reinsurance, which involves reinsuring life insurance policies that are often in force for the remaining lifetime of the underlying individuals insured, with premiums earned typically over a period of 10 to 30 years. Each year, however, a portion of the business under existing treaties terminates due to, among other things, lapses or surrenders of underlying policies, deaths of policyholders, and the exercise of recapture options by ceding companies.

The Company derives revenues primarily from renewal premiums from existing reinsurance treaties, new business premiums from existing or new reinsurance treaties, income earned on invested assets, and fees earned from financial reinsurance transactions. The Company believes that industry trends have not changed materially from those discussed in its ~~2006~~2007 Annual Report.

The Company’s profitability primarily depends on the volume and amount of death claims incurred and its ability to adequately price the risks it assumes. While death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of ~~many~~ years, claims become less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation from quarter to quarter and year to year. The maximum amount of coverage the Company retains per life is $6$8.0 million. Claims in excess of this retention amount are retroceded to retrocessionaires; however, the Company remains fully liable to the ceding company for the entire amount of risk it assumes. The Company believes its sources of liquidity are sufficient to cover potential claims payments on both a short-term and long-term basis.

The Company measures performance based on income or loss from continuing operations before income taxes for each of its five segments. The Company’s U.S., Canada, Europe & South Africa and Asia Pacific operations provide traditional life reinsurance to clients. The Company’s U.S. operations also provide asset-intensive and financial reinsurance products. The Company also provides insurers with critical illness reinsurance in its Canada, Europe & South Africa and Asia Pacific operations. Asia Pacific operations also provide financial reinsurance. The Corporate and Other segment results include the corporate investment activity, general corporate expenses, interest expense of RGA, operations of RGA Technology Partners, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary that develops and markets technology solutions for the insurance industry, Argentine privatized pension business in run-off, investment income and expense associated with the Company’s collateral finance facility and the provision for income taxes. The Company’s discontinued accident and health operations are not reflected in its results from continuing operations.

The Company allocates capital to its segments based on an internally developed risk capital model, the purpose of which is to measure the risk in the business and to provide a basis upon which capital is deployed. The economic capital model considers the unique and specific nature of the risks inherent in RGA’s businesses. As a result of the economic capital allocation process, a portion of investment income and investment related gains ~~(losses)~~and losses are credited to the segments based on the level of allocated equity. In addition, the segments are charged for excess capital utilized above the allocated economic capital basis. This charge is included in policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses.

Results of Operations

Consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes ~~increased $4.2~~decreased $62.5 million, or ~~3.5%~~52.5%, in the first quarter of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease in income can be largely attributed to unfavorable mortality experience in the U.S. and ~~$41.5 million, or 12.8%, for the third quarter~~Europe & South Africa segments and ~~first nine months of 2007, respectively, primarily~~unrealized loss due to ~~increased~~an unfavorable change in the value of embedded derivatives within the U.S. segment due to the impact of widening credit spreads in the U.S. debt markets.

The unrealized loss due to an unfavorable change in value of embedded derivatives is primarily related to reinsurance treaties written on a modified coinsurance or funds withheld basis and subject to the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 133 Implementation Issue No. B36, “Embedded Derivatives: Modified Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit Risk Exposures That Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor under Those Instruments” (“Issue B36”). Additionally, changes in risk free rates used in the present value calculations of embedded derivatives associated with equity-indexed annuity treaties (“EIAs”) negatively affected income before income taxes. Unfavorable changes in these two types of embedded derivatives, after adjustment for deferred acquisition costs and retrocession, resulted in a decrease in consolidated income from continuing operations before income taxes of approximately $47.5 million in the first quarter of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. These fluctuations do not affect current cash flows, crediting rates or spread performance on the underlying treaties. Therefore, Company management believes it is helpful to distinguish between the effects of changes in these embedded derivatives and

the primary factors that drive profitability of the underlying treaties, namely investment income, fee income, and interest credited. Additionally, over the expected life of the underlying treaties, management expects the cumulative effect of the embedded derivatives to be immaterial.

Offsetting these negative income items in the first quarter was an increase in premium levels in all ~~segments. Also, contributing to these increases were improved~~segments and favorable mortality experience in the Canada ~~segment partially offset by adverse mortality experience in the Europe~~ and ~~South Africa segment.~~Asia Pacific segments. Favorable foreign currency exchange fluctuations resulted in an increase to income from continuing operations before income taxes totaling approximately ~~$5.3 million and $6.8~~$7.1 million for the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively.~~ 2008.

Consolidated net premiums increased ~~$151.7~~$172.6 million, or ~~14.1%~~15.3%, ~~and $415.8 million, or 13.2%, during~~in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007, ~~respectively,~~ due to growth in life reinsurance in force. Consolidated assumed insurance in force increased to $2.2 trillion for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 from $2.0 trillion for quarter ended March 31, 2007. Assumed new business production for the first quarter of 2008 totaled $76.4 billion compared to $61.8 billion in the same period in 2007. Foreign currency fluctuations favorably affected net premiums by approximately ~~$33.4 million and $67.7~~$46.5 million in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively, as compared to the same periods in 2006.~~2008.

Consolidated investment income, net of related expenses, ~~increased $7.1~~decreased $16.2 million, or ~~3.9%, and $142.2 million, or 26.4%,~~7.5% during the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively,~~2008 primarily due to market value changes related to the Company’s funds withheld at interest investment related to the reinsurance of certain equity indexed

annuity products, which are substantially offset by a corresponding change in interest credited to policyholder account balances resulting in a negligible effect on net income. Also offsetting the decrease in investment income was a larger invested asset base and a higher effective investment portfolio yield. Invested assets as of ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 totaled ~~$15.9~~$16.3 billion, a ~~12.4%~~7.3% increase over ~~September 30, 2006. A portion of the increase in invested assets is related to the Company’s investment of the net proceeds from the issuance of senior notes in~~ March 31, 2007. The average yield earned on investments, excluding funds withheld, increased ~~slightly from 5.79%~~to 6.06% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2006 to 6.00%~~2008 from 5.93% for the ~~third~~first quarter of 2007. The average yield will vary from quarter to quarter and year to year depending on a number of variables, including the prevailing interest rate and credit spread environment, ~~and~~ changes in the mix of the underlying investments, and the timing of dividends and distributions on certain investments. ~~Net investment~~

Investment related losses, ~~totaled $24.7~~net increased $149.6 million ~~for~~in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2007 which includes $4.7~~2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. This increase is primarily due to a $148.5 million loss in ~~other-than-temporary write-downs on fixed maturity securities and a $10.5 million foreign currency translation loss~~the aforementioned embedded derivatives related to ~~the Company’s decision to sell its direct insurance operations in Argentina. The Company does not expect the ultimate sale of that subsidiary to generate a material financial impact.~~Issue B36. Investment income and ~~a portion of~~ investment related gains ~~(losses)~~and losses are allocated to the operating segments based upon average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes.

Income before income taxes was negatively affected by a decrease, net of deferred acquisition costs, in the value of embedded derivatives associated with modified coinsurance arrangements due to the impact of widening credit spreads in the U.S. debt markets. The net effect on income before income taxes for the third quarter and first nine months of 2007 was a decrease of $13.8 million and $14.7 million, respectively.

The effective tax rate on a consolidated basis was ~~33.6% for the third quarter and 35.1%~~35.5% for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2007, compared to 35.7%~~2008 and ~~35.0% for the comparable prior-year periods. The~~2007. These effective tax rates ~~for the third quarter and first nine months of 2007~~ were affected by the ongoing application of ~~FIN 48.~~FASB issued Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109”.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s accounting policies are described in Note 2 in the ~~2006~~2007 Annual Report. The Company believes its most critical accounting policies include the capitalization and amortization of deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”); the establishment of liabilities for future policy benefits, other policy claims and benefits, including incurred but not reported claims; the valuation of investments, derivatives and investment ~~impairments;~~impairments, if any; accounting for income taxes; and the establishment of arbitration or litigation reserves. The balances of these accounts are significant to the Company’s financial position and require extensive use of assumptions and estimates, particularly related to the future performance of the underlying business.

Additionally, for each of the Company’s reinsurance contracts, it must determine if the contract provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk, in accordance with applicable accounting standards. The Company must review all contractual features, particularly those that may limit the amount of insurance risk to which the Company is subject or features that delay the timely reimbursement of claims. If the Company determines that the possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk will occur only under remote circumstances, it records the contract under a deposit method of accounting with the net amount receivable or payable reflected in premiums receivable and other reinsurance balances or other reinsurance liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Fees earned on the contracts are reflected as other revenues, as opposed to net premiums, on the condensed consolidated statements of income.

Costs of acquiring new business, which vary with and are primarily related to the production of new business, have been deferred to the extent that such costs are deemed recoverable from future premiums or gross profits. Deferred policy acquisition costs reflect the Company’s expectations about the future experience of the business in force and include commissions and allowances as well as certain costs of policy issuance and underwriting. Some of the factors that can affect

claims, which is the primary information used to establish reserves. The Company’s administration departments work directly with its clients to help ensure information is submitted by them in accordance with the reinsurance contracts. Additionally, the Company performs periodic audits of the information provided by ceding companies. The Company establishes reserves for processing backlogs with a goal of clearing all backlogs within a ninety-day period. The backlogs are usually due to data errors the Company discovers or computer file compatibility issues, since much of the data reported to the Company is in electronic format and is uploaded to its computer systems.

The Company periodically reviews actual historical experience and relative anticipated experience compared to the assumptions used to establish aggregate policy reserves. Further, the Company establishes premium deficiency reserves if actual and anticipated experience indicates that existing aggregate policy reserves, together with the present value of future gross premiums, are not sufficient to cover the present value of future benefits, settlement and maintenance costs and to recover unamortized acquisition costs. The premium deficiency reserve is established through a charge to income, as well as a reduction to unamortized acquisition costs and, to the extent there are no unamortized acquisition costs, an increase to future policy benefits. Because of the many assumptions and estimates used in establishing reserves and the long-term nature of the Company’s reinsurance contracts, the reserving process, while based on actuarial science, is inherently uncertain. If the Company’s assumptions, particularly on mortality, are inaccurate, its reserves may be inadequate to pay claims and there could be a material adverse effect on its results of operations and financial condition.

Other policy claims and benefits include claims payable for incurred but not reported losses, which are determined using case-basis estimates and lag studies of past experience. These estimates are periodically reviewed and any adjustments to such estimates, if necessary, are reflected in current operations. The time lag from the date of the claim or death to the date when the ceding company reports the claim to the Company can be several months and can vary significantly by ceding company and business segment. The Company updates its analysis of incurred but not reported claims, including lag studies, on a periodic basis and adjusts its claim liabilities accordingly. The adjustments in a given period are generally not significant relative to the overall policy liabilities.

The Company primarily invests in fixed maturity securities and monitors these fixed maturity securities to determine potential impairments in value. With the Company’s external investment managers, it evaluates its intent and ability to hold securities, along with factors such as the financial condition of the issuer, payment performance, the extent to which the market value has been below amortized cost, compliance with covenants, general market and industry sector conditions, and various other factors. Securities, based on management’s judgments, with an other-than-temporary impairment in value are written down to management’s estimate of fair value.

Differences in experience compared with the assumptions and estimates utilized in the justification of the recoverability of DAC, in establishing reserves for future policy benefits and claim liabilities, or in the determination of other-than-temporary impairments to investment securities can have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition.

Income taxes represent the net amount of income taxes that the Company expects to pay to or receive from various taxing jurisdictions in connection with its operations. The Company provides for federal, state and foreign income taxes currently payable, as well as those deferred due to temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities. The Company’s accounting for income taxes represents management’s best estimate of various events and transactions.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities are measured at the balance sheet date using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The realization of deferred tax assets depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward periods under the tax law in the applicable tax jurisdiction.

Valuation allowances are established when management determines, based on available information, that it is ~~currently~~more likely than not that deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Significant judgment is required in determining whether valuation allowances should be established as well as the amount of such allowances. When making such determination, consideration is given to, among other things, the following:

(i)		future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards;

(ii)		future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences;

(iii)		taxable income in prior carryback years; and

(iv)		tax planning strategies.

The Company may be required to change its provision for income taxes in certain circumstances. Examples of such circumstances include when the ultimate deductibility of certain items is challenged by taxing authorities or when estimates used in determining valuation allowances on deferred tax assets significantly change or when receipt of new information indicates the need for adjustment in valuation allowances. Additionally, future events such as changes in tax legislation could have an impact on the provision for income tax and the effective tax rate. Any such changes could significantly affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements in the period these changes occur.

In accordance with SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), valuation techniques used for assets and embedded derivative liabilities accounted for at fair value are generally categorized into three types:

Market Approach. Market approach valuation techniques use prices and other relevant information from market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. Valuation techniques consistent with the market approach include comparables and matrix pricing. Comparables use market multiples, which might lie in ranges with a different multiple for each comparable. The selection of where within the range the appropriate multiple falls requires judgment, considering both quantitative and qualitative factors specific to the measurement. Matrix pricing is a mathematical technique used principally to value certain securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but comparing the securities to benchmark or comparable securities.

Income Approach. Income approach valuation techniques convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount, or a discounted amount. These techniques rely on current expectations of future amounts. Examples of income approach valuation techniques include present value techniques, option-pricing models and binomial or lattice models that incorporate present value techniques.

Cost Approach. Cost approach valuation techniques are based upon the amount that, at present, would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset, or the current replacement cost. That is, from the perspective of a market participant (seller), the price that would be received for the asset is determined based on the cost to a market participant (buyer) to acquire or construct a substitute asset of comparable utility.

The three approaches described within SFAS 157 are consistent with generally accepted valuation methodologies. While all three approaches are not applicable to all assets or liabilities accounted for at fair value, where appropriate and possible, one or more valuation techniques may be used. The selection of the valuation method(s) to apply considers the definition of an exit price and the nature of the asset or liability being valued and significant expertise and judgment is required. For assets and liabilities accounted for at fair value, valuation techniques are generally a combination of the market and income approaches. For the quarter ended March 31, 2008, the application of valuation techniques applied to similar assets and liabilities has been consistent. Changes in interest rates, including credit spreads and the Company’s own credit risk, can have a significant impact on the fair value calculations. Additionally, changes in the actuarial assumptions regarding policyholder behavior may result in significant fluctuations in embedded derivative liabilities associated with equity-indexed annuity reinsurance treaties.

Level 3 assets were 14.6% of total assets measured at fair value and Level 3 liabilities were 99.9% of total liabilities measured at fair value as of March 31, 2008. Transfers in and out of Level 3 for the period ended March 31, 2008 were not significant. Please refer to Note 5 – “Fair Value Disclosures” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the Company’s assets and liabilities recorded at fair value as of March 31, 2008.

The Company at times is a party to various litigation and arbitrations. ~~While it is difficult to~~The Company cannot predict or determine the ultimate outcome of ~~the~~any pending litigation or arbitrations or even to provide useful ranges of potential ~~losses, it~~losses. It is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that the outcomes of such litigation and arbitrations, after consideration of the

U.S. OPERATIONS

U.S. operations consist of two major sub-segments: Traditional and Non-Traditional. The Traditional sub-segment primarily specializes in mortality-risk reinsurance. The Non-Traditional sub-segment consists of Asset-Intensive and Financial Reinsurance.

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 (dollars in thousands)


	Traditional			Non-Traditional						Total						Non-Traditional						Total
				Asset-			Financial			U.S.						Asset-			Financial			U.S.
				Intensive			Reinsurance			Operations			Traditional			Intensive			Reinsurance			Operations

Revenues:
Net premiums	$	690,388		$	1,555		$	—		$	691,943		$	725,393		$	1,663		$	—		$	727,056
Investment income, net of related expenses		89,221			28,870			(9	)		118,082			97,431			25,031			40			122,502
Investment related losses, net		(5,457	)		(5,409	)		(2	)		(10,868	)		(2,508	)		(149,554	)		(1	)		(152,063	)
Change in value of embedded derivatives		—			(52,975	)		—			(52,975	)
Other revenues		242			11,095			7,205			18,542			60			11,495			2,744			14,299

Total revenues		774,394			(16,864	)		7,194			764,724			820,376			(111,365	)		2,783			711,794

Benefits and expenses:
Claims and other policy benefits		572,871			2,280			—			575,151			651,850			185			—			652,035
Interest credited		14,845			15,457			—			30,302			14,790			58,968			—			73,758
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses		99,759			16,283			1,831			117,873			86,050			(131,750	)		198			(45,502	)
Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives		—			(39,163	)		—			(39,163	)
Other operating expenses		11,631			1,757			1,021			14,409			13,238			2,334			646			16,218

Total benefits and expenses		699,106			(3,386	)		2,852			698,572			765,928			(70,263	)		844			696,509

Income (loss) before income taxes	$	75,288		$	(13,478	)	$	4,342		$	66,152		$	54,448		$	(41,102	)	$	1,939		$	15,285

~~For the nine months ended September 30,~~March 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands)

Traditional Non-Traditional Total
Asset- Financial U.S.
Intensive Reinsurance Operations

Revenues:

Net premiums $ 2,078,560 $ 4,779 $ — $ 2,083,339
Investment income, net of related expenses 261,300 214,141 110 475,551
Investment related losses, net (10,292 ) (7,336 ) (9 ) (17,637 )
Change in value of embedded derivatives — (57,263 ) — (57,263 )
Other revenues 648 28,209 18,940 47,797

Total revenues 2,330,216 182,530 19,041 2,531,787

Benefits and expenses:

Claims and other policy benefits 1,710,076 6,250 1 1,716,327
Interest credited 43,694 159,939 — 203,633
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 300,946 58,764 6,026 365,736
Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives — (42,601 ) — (42,601 )
Other operating expenses 35,103 5,083 2,962 43,148

Total benefits and expenses 2,089,819 187,435 8,989 2,286,243

Income (loss) before income taxes $ 240,397 $ (4,905 ) $ 10,052 $ 245,544

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 (dollars in thousands)~~


	Traditional			Non-Traditional						Total						Non-Traditional				Total
				Asset-			Financial			U.S.						Asset-		Financial		U.S.
				Intensive			Reinsurance			Operations			Traditional			Intensive		Reinsurance		Operations

Revenues:
Net premiums	$	1,920,667		$	4,638		$	—		$	1,925,305		$	669,419		$	1,626	$	—	$	671,045
Investment income, net of related expenses		222,599			167,794			(162	)		390,231			84,928			67,952		20		152,900
Investment related gains (losses), net		(3,535	)		(7,842	)		4			(11,373	)		(338	)		2,055		—		1,717
Change in value of embedded derivatives		—			(2,251	)		—			(2,251	)
Other revenues		227			14,460			22,390			37,077			106			7,424		5,889		13,419

Total revenues		2,139,958			176,799			22,232			2,338,989			754,115			79,057		5,909		839,081

Benefits and expenses:
Claims and other policy benefits		1,568,045			927			4			1,568,976			542,586			4,523		1		547,110
Interest credited		35,620			112,291			—			147,911			14,270			46,158		—		60,428
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses		292,614			48,578			7,052			348,244			99,380			22,293		2,194		123,867
Change in deferred acquisition costs associated with change in value of embedded derivatives		—			(2,339	)		—			(2,339	)
Other operating expenses		31,192			5,058			3,874			40,124			11,868			1,621		1,010		14,499

Total benefits and expenses		1,927,471			164,515			10,930			2,102,916			668,104			74,595		3,205		745,904

Income before income taxes	$	212,487		$	12,284		$	11,302		$	236,073		$	86,011		$	4,462	$	2,704	$	93,177

~~2007 compared to the prior year.~~2007. Offsetting these negative income ~~impacts~~items was overall growth in total business in force as evidenced by the increase in ~~premium both~~net premiums quarter over quarter, increased investment income and ~~year over year.~~certain favorable reserve adjustments recognized in the Traditional sub-segment.

Traditional Reinsurance

The U.S. Traditional sub-segment provides life reinsurance to domestic clients for a variety of life products through yearly renewable term, coinsurance and modified coinsurance agreements. These reinsurance arrangements may be either facultative or automatic agreements. During the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007,~~2008, this sub-segment added new business production of ~~$36.5 billion and $120.9~~$34.7 billion, measured by face amount of insurance in force, ~~respectively,~~ compared to ~~$43.1~~$40.2 billion ~~and $132.7 billion during~~as of the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2006.~~2007. Management believes industry consolidation and the established practice of reinsuring mortality risks should continue to provide opportunities for growth.

Income before income taxes for the U.S. Traditional ~~reinsurance~~sub-segment decreased ~~$0.5~~$31.6 million, or ~~0.6% quarter over quarter and increased $27.9 million, or 13.1% year over year. In~~36.7%, in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007, this sub-segment experienced less favorable~~2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to adverse mortality ~~than~~experience in the ~~third~~first quarter of 2006. In addition, investment related losses increased $5.7 million. Year-to-date stronger premiums and higher investment income were the primary contributors to the increase in net income, offset in part by higher mortality and higher investment related losses.2008.

Net premiums for the U.S. Traditional ~~reinsurance totaled $690.4~~sub-segment increased $56.0 million, ~~and $2,078.6 million for~~or 8.4%, in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. ~~Comparable prior-year numbers were $646.5 million and $1,920.7 million, respectively. The 8.2%~~This increase in ~~year to date~~ net premiums was driven primarily by the growth of total U.S. Traditional business in force, which totaled just over $1.2 trillion of face amount as of ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008. This represents a 5.9% increase over the amount in force on ~~September 30, 2006.~~March 31, 2007.

Net investment income increased $12.5 million, or 14.7%, in the first quarter of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. This increase can be attributed to growth in the invested asset base and increased portfolio return. Investment income and investment related gains and losses are allocated to the various operating segments based on average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes. Investment performance varies with the composition of investments and the relative allocation of capital to the operating segments. During the third quarter of 2007, investment income in the sub-segment totaled $89.2 million, a 16.0% increase over the same period in the prior year. Year to date 2007, investment income grew 17.4% over the first nine months of 2006. This increase can be primarily attributed to growth in the invested asset base. Higher investment related losses both quarter over quarter and year over year are generally the result of the Company selling securities at lower book yields and reinvesting in higher book yielding securities. This strategy results in investment losses at the time of sale, but should generate higher future investment income.

Mortality experience for the third quarter and the first nine months of 2007, while unfavorable compared to the same prior-year periods, was within management expectations. The negative variance is mainly the result of the very favorable mortality experience seen in 2006 coupled with this sub-segment’s mix of yearly renewable term versus coinsurance business, which could cause the loss ratio to fluctuate from period to period. Claims and other policy benefits as a percentage of net premiums ~~(loss ratios)~~(“loss ratios”) were ~~83.0% for the third quarter and 82.3% for~~89.9% in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2008, compared to 81.1% in 2007. The higher loss ~~ratios for~~ratio in 2008 is due to very unfavorable mortality experience compared to the ~~same prior-year periods~~prior year. Increases in the total claim count and the level of large claims were ~~79.5% and 81.6%, respectively. Death~~major contributors to claims ~~are~~being approximately $50.0 million higher than expected. Although reasonably ~~predictable~~predicable over a period of ~~many~~ years, ~~but~~death claims are ~~less predictable~~volatile over shorter ~~periods~~periods. Management has completed an extensive review of the level and ~~are subject~~mix of claims and views recent experience as normal volatility that is inherent in the business.

Interest credited expense increased $0.5 million, or 3.6%, in the first quarter of 2008, as compared to ~~significant fluctuation.~~

the same period in 2007. The increase is the result of one treaty that had a slight increase in its asset base with a credited loan rate remaining constant at 5.6% for 2007 and 2008. Interest credited relates to amounts credited on cash value products, which have a significant mortality component. The amount of interest credited fluctuates in step with changes in deposit levels, cash surrender values and investment performance. Income before income taxes is affected by the spread between the investment income and the interest credited on the underlying products. Interest credited expense for the third quarter and first nine months of 2007 totaled $14.8 million and $43.7 million, respectively, compared to $12.3 million and $35.6 million for the same periods in 2006. The increase is primarily the result of one treaty in which the credited loan rate increased from 4.6% in 2006 to 5.6% in 2007 based on an increase in the related market index. A corresponding increase in investment income offset this additional expense.

Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums were ~~14.4% for~~11.9% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007 and 14.5% for the first nine months of~~2008, compared to 14.8% in 2007. ~~Comparable ratios for the third quarter and first nine months of 2006 were 16.9% and 15.2%, respectively.~~ Overall, while these ratios are expected to remain in a ~~certain~~predictable range, they may fluctuate from period to period due to varying allowance levels within coinsurance-type arrangements. In addition, the amortization pattern of previously capitalized amounts, which are subject to the form

Asset-Intensive Reinsurance

The U.S. Asset-Intensive sub-segment assumes investment risk within underlying annuities and corporate-owned life insurance policies. Most of these agreements are coinsurance, coinsurance with funds withheld or modified coinsurance of non-mortality risks whereby the Company recognizes profits or losses primarily from the spread between the investment income earned and the interest credited on the underlying deposit liabilities.

This sub-segment reported a loss before income taxes of $41.1 million for the first quarter of 2008 compared to income of $4.5 million for the first quarter of 2007. The unrealized loss due to an unfavorable change in the value of embedded derivatives, after adjustment for deferred acquisition costs under Issue B36; combined with the negative impact of changes in risk free rates used in the present value calculations of embedded derivatives associated with EIAs, contributed $46.8 million to the loss in 2008 and $0.7 million to the income in 2007.

In accordance with the provisions of ~~SFAS No. 133 Implementation~~ Issue ~~No.~~ B36, “Embedded Derivatives: Modified Coinsurance Arrangements and Debt Instruments That Incorporate Credit Risk Exposures That Are Unrelated or Only Partially Related to the Creditworthiness of the Obligor under Those Instruments” (“Issue B36”), the Company recorded a gross change in value of embedded derivatives of ~~$(53.0)~~$(148.5) million ~~and $(57.3) million within revenues~~ for the ~~third~~first quarter of 2008, within investment related losses, net. The amount represents a non-cash, unrealized change in value and ~~first nine months of 2007, respectively, and $(39.2) million and $(42.6)~~was somewhat offset by $(115.9) million of related deferred acquisition ~~costs.~~costs for a total net contribution of $32.6 million to the loss before income taxes. Significant fluctuations may occur as the fair value of the embedded derivatives is tied primarily to the movements in credit spreads. During the quarter, management estimates the weighted average asset credit spreads widened by approximately ~~0.30%.~~0.71 %. This was ~~partially~~somewhat offset by a decrease in risk free ~~interest rates (swap curve)~~rate of approximately ~~0.10%.~~0.44 %. Additionally, the Company uses risk free rates, in accordance with FAS 157, to discount the fair value of estimated future equity option purchases associated with its reinsurance of EIAs (a component of the embedded derivative), which increased the fair value of the embedded derivative liability. The impact from the change in risk free rates is an increase in gross embedded liability of $64.5 million, which was recorded as expense within interest credited. This increase was partially offset by $(50.4) million of related deferred acquisition costs and retrocession, for a net contribution of $14.1 million to the loss before income taxes. These fluctuations ~~have no impact on~~do not affect current cash flows, crediting rates or ~~interest spreads~~spread performance on the underlying treaties. Therefore, Company management believes it is helpful to distinguish between the effects of ~~Issue B36~~changes in these embedded derivatives and the primary factors that drive profitability of the underlying treaties, namely investment income, fee income, and interest credited. Additionally, over the expected life of the underlying treaties, management expects the cumulative effect of the impact of changes in risk free rates used in the present value calculations of embedded derivatives associated with EIAs and Issue B36 to be immaterial.

~~The Asset-Intensive sub-segment reported a loss before income taxes equal to $13.5 million for~~Excluding the ~~third quarter~~impact of ~~2007~~changes in risk free rates and ~~$4.9 million year to date. Comparable figures for 2006 were income~~credit spreads used in the present value calculations of ~~$5.3 million~~embedded derivatives associated with EIAs and ~~$12.3 million, respectively. Of the $18.8 million decrease quarter over quarter,~~ Issue B36, ~~contributed $15.2 million. The remaining $3.6 million can be primarily attributed to an increase in investment related losses. The year over year decrease in~~ income before income taxes increased $1.9 million, or 52.4%, in the first quarter of ~~$17.2~~2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. The increase can be attributed to continued growth in business and improved mortality experience in a single universal life treaty for the comparable periods. These gains were partially offset by poor performance in equity markets and the widening of credit spreads.

Total revenues, which are comprised primarily of investment income and investment related losses, net, decreased $190.4 million ~~includes $14.8~~in the first quarter of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. The losses associated with embedded derivatives subject to Issue B36, which are included in investment related losses, net, represented $151.4 million of the decrease. Excluding the losses ~~relating~~associated with embedded derivatives subject to Issue ~~B36. The remaining $2.4~~B36, revenue decreased $39.0 million, is primarily ~~the result of higher benefits~~ due to ~~an increase~~a drop in ~~benefit claims~~investment income related to option income on a ~~single premium universal life reinsurance treaty offset in part by an increase in mortality and expense fees earned on a new variable annuity treaty.~~

Revenues totaled $(16.9) million and $182.5 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2007, respectively, resulting in a decrease of $76.4 million quarter over quarter and an increase of $5.7 million year over year. Issue B36 related revenues declined $57.2 million and $55.0 in the third quarter and first nine months of 2007 compared to same year prior periods. Excluding Issue B36, total revenues decreased $19.2 million for the quarter and increased $60.7 million for the year. This drop in revenue quarter over quarter can be primarily attributed to a 40.4% decline in investment income. A significant portion of this variance is the result of market value changes related to the Company’s funds withheld ~~at interest investment associated with the reinsurance of equity indexed annuity products.~~treaty. This decrease is partially offset by a corresponding decrease in interest credited, with minimal impact on income before taxes. Year to date revenue growth can be attributed to higher mortality and expense charges earned on a variable annuity reinsurance treaty as well as an increase in investment income due to a growing asset base. The investment income growth is somewhat offset by the negative market value changes in funds withheld at interest mentioned above.credited.

The average invested asset base supporting this sub-segment grew ~~from $4.3~~to $4.8 billion in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2006 to $4.8~~2008 from $4.6 billion ~~for~~in the ~~third~~first quarter of 2007. The growth in the asset base is primarily driven by new business written on one existing equity indexed annuity treaty. Invested assets outstanding were $4.7 billion as of ~~September 30, 2007 were $4.8~~March 31, 2008 and 2007. As of March 31, 2008 the invested asset base is slightly lower than the average as the outstanding balance reflects a drop in option value since the end of 2007. As of March 31, 2008, $3.4 billion of ~~which $3.5 billion~~the invested assets were funds withheld at ~~interest. Of the $3.5 billion~~interest of ~~total funds withheld balance as of September 30, 2007, 91.1% of the balance~~which 90.8% is associated with one client. As of March 31, 2007, $3.2 billion of the invested assets were funds withheld balance of which 90.7% of the balance was associated with one client.

expenses decreased $41.0 million. This decrease is primarily due to a decrease in decreased expenses of $15.7 million for the third quarter and increased expenses of $63.2 million for the first nine months, respectively, excluding Issue B36. The majority of the change in benefits and expenses relates to interest ~~credited expense, which declined $15.4 million and increased $47.6 million quarter over quarter and year over year, respectively.~~credited. As mentioned above, a large part of this ~~variance~~decrease relates to market value changes in certain equity indexed annuity products and is offset in investment income. ~~Also contributing to the increase in benefits and expenses year over year is an increase in benefit claims on a single premium universal life reinsurance treaty in the first quarter of 2007.~~

Financial Reinsurance

The U.S. Financial Reinsurance sub-segment income consists primarily of net fees earned on financial reinsurance transactions. The majority of the financial reinsurance risks are assumed by the Company and retroceded to other insurance companies or brokered business in which the company ~~does not participate in the assumption of~~assumes little risk. The fees earned from ~~the assumption of the~~ financial reinsurance contracts are reflected in other revenues, and the fees paid to retrocessionaires are reflected in policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses. Fees earned on brokered business are reflected in other revenues.

Income before income taxes ~~increased $0.6~~decreased $0.8 million, or 28.3%, in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and decreased $1.3 million for the first nine months~~ of ~~2007~~2008, as compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2006. In 2006, both the domestic~~2007. At March 31, 2008 and ~~a portion of various Asia Pacific financial reinsurance treaties were reflected in this segment. Beginning in~~ 2007, the Asia Pacific-based treaties are included with the Company’s Asia Pacific segment with reimbursement to the U.S. segment for costs incurred by U.S. personnel. The current quarter earnings benefited by $1.0 million due to a recapture associated with one large treaty.

~~At September 30, 2007 and 2006,~~ the amount of reinsurance provided, as measured by pre-tax statutory surplus, was $0.5 billion and ~~$1.8~~$1.1 billion, respectively. ~~This~~The decrease in reinsurance provided is aprimarily the result of ~~the aforementioned change in reporting for Asia Pacific-based treaties and~~ the recapture of one ~~large treaty.~~treaty which totaled $0.5 billion at the end of first quarter 2007. The pre-tax statutory surplus amounts indicated include all business assumed or brokered by the Company in the U.S. Fees earned from this business can vary significantly depending on the size of the transactions and the timing of their completion and therefore can fluctuate from period to period.

CANADA OPERATIONS

The Company conducts reinsurance business in Canada through RGA Life Reinsurance Company of Canada (“RGA Canada”), a wholly-owned subsidiary. RGA Canada assists clients with capital management activity and mortality and morbidity risk management, and is primarily engaged in traditional individual life reinsurance, as well as creditor, critical illness, and group life and health reinsurance. Creditor insurance covers the outstanding balance on personal, mortgage or commercial loans in the event of death, disability or critical illness and is generally shorter in duration than traditional life insurance.

For the three months ended March 31, (dollars in thousands)


	For the three months ended					For the nine months ended				2008			2007
	September 30,					September 30,
(dollars in thousands)	2007		2006			2007		2006

Revenues:
Net premiums	$	123,676	$	103,316		$	345,748	$	294,838	$	138,992		$	99,492
Investment income, net of related expenses		31,057		27,578			89,852		78,881		36,033			26,432
Investment related gains, net		2,713		1,419			7,145		3,565
Investment related gains (losses), net											(4,085	)		2,784
Other revenues		1		(452	)		180		315		13			86

Total revenues		157,447		131,861			442,925		377,599		170,953			128,794

Benefits and expenses:
Claims and other policy benefits		106,416		95,854			303,231		280,382		115,271			91,148
Interest credited		170		211			541		623		139			186
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses		23,118		18,146			62,937		51,735		26,426			18,476
Other operating expenses		4,945		4,188			14,182		11,892		5,446			3,950

Total benefits and expenses		134,649		118,399			380,891		344,632		147,282			113,760

Income before income taxes	$	22,798	$	13,462		$	62,034	$	32,967	$	23,671		$	15,034

Income before income taxes increased by ~~$9.3~~$8.6 million, or ~~69.4%, and $29.1 million or 88.2%~~57.4%, in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively. These increases were primarily~~2008, as compared to the ~~result of higher premium volume, favorable mortality experience~~same period in ~~the current periods and an increase of $3.6 million in investment related gains for the first nine months.~~2007. Strength in the Canadian dollar resulted in an increase to income before income taxes totaling approximately ~~$1.9~~$4.7 million for the first quarter of 2008. The remaining increase in 2008 was primarily the result of higher premium volume, favorable mortality experience in the current period offset by a decrease of $6.9 million in investment related gains and ~~$2.0 million during the third quarter and first nine months of 2007, respectively.~~losses, net.

Net premiums increased by ~~$20.4~~$39.5 million, or ~~19.7%~~39.7%, ~~and $50.9 million or 17.3%~~ in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and~~of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. A stronger Canadian dollar resulted in an increase in net premiums of approximately $19.8 million in the first ~~nine months of 2007, respectively.~~quarter 2008 compared to 2007. The remaining increase is primarily due to new business from both new and existing treaties. In addition, an increase in premium from creditor treaties contributed ~~$6.4~~$9.1 million ~~and $19.7 million of the premium increase~~ in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively.~~2008. Creditor and group life and health premiums represented ~~18.0%~~19.5% and ~~14.4%~~18.2% of net premiums in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of 2008 and 2007, ~~and 2006,~~ respectively. A stronger Canadian dollar resulted in an increase in net premiums of approximately $8.4 million and $9.5 million in the third quarter and first nine months of 2007, respectively, as compared to 2006. Premium levels ~~are~~can be significantly influenced by large transactions, mix of business and reporting practices of ceding companies and therefore ~~can~~may fluctuate from period to period.

Net investment income increased ~~$3.5~~$9.6 million, or ~~12.6%~~36.3%, ~~and $11.0 million or 13.9%~~ in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively.~~2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. A stronger Canadian dollar resulted in an increase in net investment income of approximately ~~$2.2 million and $2.5~~$5.2 million in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively.~~2008. Investment income and investment related gains and losses are allocated to the segments based upon average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes. Investment performance varies with the composition of investments and the relative allocation of capital to the operating segments. The increase in investment income was mainly the result of an increase in the allocated asset base due to growth in the underlying business volume.

Loss ratios for this segment were ~~86.0% and 87.7%~~82.9% in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively,~~2008, compared to ~~92.8% and 95.1%~~91.6% in ~~the comparable prior-year periods. During 2006 and 2005, the Company entered into three significant creditor reinsurance treaties.~~2007. The loss ratios on ~~this type of~~creditor reinsurance business are normally lower than traditional reinsurance, ~~however,~~while allowances are normally higher as a percentage of premiums. Loss ratios for creditor business were 40.7% in the first quarter of 2008, compared to 49.7% in 2007. Excluding creditor business, the loss ~~ratios~~ratio for this segment ~~were 96.2% and 97.1%~~was 93.2% in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively,~~2008, compared to ~~100.4% and 102.6%~~100.9% in ~~the comparable prior-year periods.~~2007. The lower loss ~~ratios~~ratio in ~~2007 are~~2008 is primarily due to favorable mortality experience compared to the prior year. Historically, the loss ratio increased primarily as the result of several large permanent level premium ~~in-force~~in force blocks assumed in 1997 and 1998. These blocks are mature blocks of permanent level premium business in which mortality as a percentage of net premiums

is expected to be higher than historical ratios. The nature of permanent level premium policies requires the Company to set up actuarial liabilities and invest the amounts received in excess of early-year mortality costs to fund claims in the later years when premiums, by design, continue to be level as compared to expected increasing mortality or claim costs. Claims and other policy benefits, as a percentage of net premiums and investment income ~~were 68.8% and 69.6%~~was 65.9% in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively,~~2008, compared to ~~73.2% and 75.0%~~72.4% in ~~the comparable prior-year periods. Death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, but are less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation.~~2007.

Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums ~~totaled 18.7% and 18.2%~~were 19.0% in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively,~~2008, compared to ~~17.6%~~18.6% in 2007. Policy acquisition costs and ~~17.5%~~other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums for creditor business were 49.3% in the ~~comparable prior-year periods.~~first quarter of 2008, compared to 44.1% in 2007. Excluding creditor business, policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums ~~totaled 11.1% and~~were 11.6% in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively,~~2008, compared to ~~12.0% and 12.6%~~12.9% in ~~the comparable prior-year periods.~~2007. Overall, while these ratios are expected to remain in a ~~certain~~predictable range, they may fluctuate from period to period due to varying allowance levels, significantly caused by the mix of first year coinsurance business versus yearly renewable term business. In addition, the amortization pattern of previously capitalized amounts, which are subject to the form of the reinsurance agreement and the underlying insurance policies, may vary.

Other operating expenses increased ~~$0.8~~$1.5 million, or ~~18.1%, and $2.3 million, or 19.3%~~37.9%, in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively.~~2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. A stronger Canadian dollar resulted in an increase in other operating expenses of $0.7 million in 2008. Other operating expenses as a percentage of net premiums ~~totaled 4.0% and 4.1%~~were 3.9% in the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively,~~2008, compared to ~~4.1% and~~ 4.0% in ~~the comparable prior-year periods.~~2007.

EUROPE & SOUTH AFRICA OPERATIONS

The Europe & South Africa segment has operations in France, Germany, ~~France,~~ India, Italy, Mexico, Poland, Spain, South Africa and the United Kingdom (“UK”). The segment provides life reinsurance for a variety of products through yearly renewable term and coinsurance agreements, and reinsurance of critical illness coverage. Reinsurance agreements may be either facultative or automatic agreements covering primarily individual risks and in some markets, group risks.

For the three months ended For the nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
(dollars in thousands) 2007 2006 2007 2006

Revenues:

Net premiums $ 170,774 $ 145,769 $ 503,366 $ 436,993
Investment income, net of related expenses 5,569 4,210 18,446 11,475
Investment related losses, net (863 ) (91 ) (1,717 ) (238 )
Other revenues (43 ) 206 61 119

Total revenues 175,437 150,094 520,156 448,349

Benefits and expenses:

Claims and other policy benefits 127,281 101,492 370,263 308,172
Interest credited 3 133 1,019 479
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 22,592 28,110 65,781 69,188
Other operating expenses 13,872 11,546 38,434 29,631

Total benefits and expenses 163,748 141,281 475,497 407,470

Income before income taxes $ 11,689 $ 8,813 $ 44,659 $ 40,879

For the three months ended March 31, (dollars in thousands)

~~Income before income taxes was $11.7 million in the third quarter of 2007 as compared to $8.8 million for the third quarter of 2006, and $44.7 million for the first nine~~

2008 2007

Revenues:

Net premiums $ 189,196 $ 167,796
Investment income, net of related expenses 7,551 5,774
Investment related gains (losses), net 745 (224 )
Other revenues 60 131

Total revenues 197,552 173,477

Benefits and expenses:

Claims and other policy benefits 158,535 114,154
Interest credited — 452
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 17,230 26,060
Other operating expenses 15,744 11,687

Total benefits and expenses 191,509 152,353

Income before income taxes $ 6,043 $ 21,124

~~months~~Income before income taxes decreased by $15.1 million, or 71.4%, in the first quarter of ~~2006.~~2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. The ~~increase for the third quarter~~decrease was primarily due to ~~an increase in the volume of premiums over the prior year~~adverse claims experience partially offset by ~~adverse mortality experience for~~increased net premiums and decreased policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007~~2008 compared to the ~~prior year. The nine month increase~~same period in 2007 over 2006 was due to growth in net premiums and investment income which was partially offset by adverse mortality experience and an increase in the investment related losses for the first nine months of 2007 compared to 2006.2007. Favorable foreign currency exchange fluctuations resulted in an increase to income before income taxes totaling approximately ~~$1.4 million and $1.8~~$0.7 million for the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively.~~2008.

~~Europe & South Africa net~~Net premiums increased ~~$25.0~~$21.4 million, or ~~17.2%~~12.8%, in the ~~third~~first quarter of 2008, as compared to the same period in ~~2006, and increased $66.4 million or 15.2% during the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006.~~2007. This increase was primarily the result of new business from both ~~existing~~new and ~~new~~existing treaties. During the ~~third~~first quarter, ~~and for the first nine months of 2007,~~ several foreign currencies, particularly the British pound and the euro strengthened against the U.S. dollar and increased net premiums by approximately ~~$11.4 million and $30.6 million for the third quarter and first nine months of 2007, respectively, over the prior year.~~$4.2 million. A significant portion of the net premiums ~~was due~~for the segment, in each period presented, relates to reinsurance of critical illness coverage, primarily in the UK. This coverage provides a benefit in the event of the diagnosis of a pre-defined critical illness. Net premiums earned from ~~policies including~~ this coverage totaled ~~$59.6~~$60.4 million ~~and $174.5 million during~~for the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively,~~2008, as compared to ~~$54.5~~$57.0 million ~~and $156.1 million in~~for the ~~comparable prior-year periods.~~first quarter of 2007. Premium levels are significantly influenced by large transactions and reporting practices of ceding companies and therefore can fluctuate from period to period.

~~Investment~~Net investment income increased ~~$1.4~~$1.8 million, ~~for~~or 30.8%, in the ~~third~~first quarter of 2008, as compared to the same period in ~~2006 and increased $7.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. These increases were~~2007. This increase was primarily due to an increase in allocated investment income. Investment income and investment related gains and losses are allocated to the various operating segments based on average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes. Investment performance varies with the composition of investments and the relative allocation of capital to the operating segments.

Loss ratios for this segment were ~~74.5% and 69.6% for~~83.8% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007 and 2006, respectively, and 73.6% and 70.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively.~~2008, compared to 68.0% in 2007. The increase in the loss ~~ratios is~~ratio for the first quarter of 2008 was primarily due ~~primarily~~ to ~~favorable~~unfavorable claims experience in the UK ~~during 2006. Death claims are reasonably predictable over a~~and South Africa, while the prior period ~~of many years, but are less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation.~~reflected favorable mortality experience.

Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums were ~~13.2%~~9.1% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007~~2008, as compared to ~~19.3%~~15.5% in ~~the third quarter of 2006, and 13.1% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to 15.8% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.~~2007. These percentages fluctuate due to timing of client company reporting, variations in the mixture of business being reinsured and the relative maturity of the business. In addition, as the segment grows, renewal premiums, which have lower allowances than first-year premiums, represent a greater percentage of the total net premiums.

Other operating expenses increased $4.1 million, or 34.7%, as compared to ~~8.1%~~the same period in 2007. Other operating expenses as a percentage of net premiums totaled 8.3% in the ~~current~~first quarter ~~and 7.6%~~ of ~~net premiums for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, up from 7.9% and 6.8%~~2008, compared to 7.0% in ~~the comparable prior-year periods. These increases were~~2007. This increase was due to higher costs associated with maintaining and supporting the segment’s increase in business over the past several years and the Company’s recent expansion into ~~Central~~central Europe. The Company believes that sustained growth in net premiums should lessen the burden of start-up expenses and expansion costs over time.

ASIA PACIFIC OPERATIONS

The Asia Pacific segment has operations in Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, New Zealand, South Korea, Taiwan and mainland China. The principal types of reinsurance for this segment include life, critical illness, disability income, superannuation, and financial reinsurance. Superannuation is the Australian government mandated compulsory retirement savings program. Superannuation funds accumulate retirement funds for employees, and in addition, offer life and disability insurance coverage. Reinsurance agreements may be either facultative or automatic agreements covering primarily individual risks and in some markets, group risks.

For the three months ended March 31, (dollars in thousands)

2008 2007

Revenues:

Net premiums $ 240,935 $ 186,838
Investment income, net of related expenses 11,414 8,663
Investment related gains (losses), net 514 (71 )
Other revenues 2,552 1,827

Total revenues 255,415 197,257

Benefits and expenses:

Claims and other policy benefits 193,669 150,483
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 28,081 24,614
Other operating expenses 15,102 11,828

Total benefits and expenses 236,852 186,925

Income before income taxes $ 18,563 $ 10,332

For the three months ended For the nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
(dollars in thousands) 2007 2006 2007 2006

Revenues:

Net premiums $ 240,476 $ 178,550 $ 626,285 $ 486,615
Investment income, net of related expenses 9,134 7,036 26,407 20,354
Investment related losses, net (367 ) (46 ) (937 ) (123 )
Other revenues 2,105 1,243 6,515 4,734

Total revenues 251,348 186,783 658,270 511,580

Benefits and expenses:

Claims and other policy benefits 197,827 134,177 499,974 376,399
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses 22,833 20,658 75,620 70,230
Other operating expenses 13,448 11,570 39,495 30,234

Total benefits and expenses 234,108 166,405 615,089 476,863

Income before income taxes $ 17,240 $ 20,378 $ 43,181 $ 34,717

Income before income taxes ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$3.1~~$8.2 million, or 79.7%, in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007 and increased by $8.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007,~~2008, as compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2006. Very favorable mortality in the third quarter of 2006 led to a challenging comparison to the current quarter, which also experienced modestly favorable mortality experience.~~2007. Favorable results from operations throughout the segment, primarily due to increased net premiums, contributed to the increase in income before income taxes for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2007~~2008, compared to the same period in ~~2006.~~2007. Favorable foreign currency exchange fluctuations resulted in an increase to income before income taxes totaling approximately ~~$1.5 million and $2.4~~$2.2 million for the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and first nine months~~ of ~~2007, respectively.~~2008.

Net premiums grew ~~$61.9~~$54.1 million, or ~~34.7%~~29.0%, ~~during~~in the ~~current~~first quarter ~~and $139.7 million, or 28.7%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2007,~~of 2008, as compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2006.~~2007. This premium growth was due to increased net premiums in all offices but primarily the result of increases in the volume of business in Australia, Japan and Korea. Premiums in Australia increased by ~~$13.2~~$22.8 million in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007, and $42.8~~2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. Premiums in Japan increased by $13.0 million ~~for~~in the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2007,~~first quarter of 2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. Premiums in Korea increased by $7.0 million in the first quarter of 2008, as compared to the same periods in 2006. Premiums in Japan increased by $8.8 million in the third quarter of 2007, and $51.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same periods in 2006. Premiums in Korea increased by $22.5 million in the third quarter of 2007, and $27.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same periods in 2006.2007. Premium levels are significantly influenced by large transactions and reporting practices of ceding companies and can fluctuate from period to period.

Foreign currencies in certain significant markets, particularly the Australian and New Zealand dollars and the Japanese yen, have strengthened against the U.S. dollar during the first three months of 2008 compared to 2007. The overall effect of changes in local Asia Pacific segment currencies was an increase in net premiums of approximately $22.4 million for the first quarter of 2008 when compared to the same quarter in 2007.

A portion of the net premiums for the segment, in each period presented, ~~represents~~relates to reinsurance of critical illness coverage. This coverage provides a benefit in the event of the diagnosis of a pre-defined critical illness. Reinsurance of critical illness in the Asia Pacific operations is offered primarily in South Korea, Australia and Hong Kong. Net premiums earned from this coverage totaled $35.0 million and $90.9 million during the third quarter and first nine months of 2007, respectively, compared to $12.6 million and $47.4 million during the third quarter and first nine months of 2006, respectively. Foreign currencies in certain significant markets, particularly the Australian and New Zealand dollars, have strengthened against the U.S. dollar during the first nine months of 2007. The overall effect of changes in local Asia Pacific segment currencies was an increase in net premiums of approximately $13.6 million and $27.6$35.5 million for the ~~third~~first quarter ~~and~~of 2008, as compared to $34.3 million for the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2007, respectively.~~2007.

Net investment income increased ~~$2.1~~$2.8 million, or 31.8%, in the ~~current~~first quarter of 2008, as compared to the ~~prior-year quarter, and $6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2006.~~same period in 2007. This increase was primarily due to ~~growth~~an increase in ~~the invested assets in Australia.~~allocated investment income. Investment income and investment related gains and losses are allocated to the various operating segments based on average assets and related capital

levels deemed appropriate to support the segment business volumes. Investment performance varies with the composition of investments and the relative allocation of capital to the operating segments.

Other revenues increased by ~~$0.9~~$0.7 million, ~~for~~or 39.7%, in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007,~~2008, as compared to the same period in ~~2006, and increased by $1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the same period in 2006.~~2007. The primary source of other revenues ~~in 2007 and 2006 has been~~are fees from financial reinsurance ~~treaties. Prior to~~treaties in Japan. At March 31, 2008 and 2007, ~~a portion~~the amount of reinsurance assumed from client companies, as measured by pre-tax statutory surplus, was $0.7 billion. Fees earned from this business can vary significantly depending on the size of the ~~fee income generated by certain Asia Pacific financial reinsurance treaties was reflected in~~transactions and the ~~U.S. financial reinsurance segment. Beginning in 2007, all~~timing of ~~the fee income~~their completion and therefore can fluctuate from ~~the Asia Pacific-based financial reinsurance treaties is included within the Asia Pacific segment with reimbursement~~period to ~~the U.S. segment for costs incurred by U.S. personnel.~~period.

Loss ratios for this segment were ~~82.3% and 75.1% for~~80.4% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007 and 2006, respectively, and 79.8% and 77.4% for~~2008, compared to 80.5% in 2007. The slight decrease in the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2007 and September 30, 2006, respectively. The increased~~ loss ratio for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007~~2008 was largely due to more favorable mortality ~~experience in 2006.~~experience. Loss ratios will fluctuate due to timing of client company reporting, variations in the mixture of business being reinsured and the relative maturity of the business. ~~Death claims are reasonably predictable over a period of many years, but are less predictable over shorter periods and are subject to significant fluctuation.~~

Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums were ~~9.5% during~~11.7% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007,~~2008, as compared to 11.6% for the third quarter of 2006. Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums were 12.1% during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as compared to 14.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2006.13.2% in 2007. The ratio of policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses as a percentage of net premiums will generally decline as the business matures, however, the percentage does fluctuate periodically due to timing of client company reporting and variations in the mixture of business being reinsured.

Other operating expenses ~~decreased~~increased $3.3 million, or 27.7%, as compared to ~~5.6%~~the same period on 2007. Operating expenses as a percentage of net premiums remained stable at 6.3% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007, as compared to 6.5% for the third quarter of 2006. Operating expenses were 6.3% of net premiums for the nine months ended September 30, 2007~~2008 and ~~6.2% in the comparable prior-year period.~~2007. The timing of premium flows and the level of costs associated with the entrance into and development of new markets in the growing Asia Pacific segment may cause other operating expenses as a percentage of net premiums to fluctuate over periods of time.

CORPORATE AND OTHER

Corporate and Other revenues include investment income from invested assets not allocated to support segment operations and undeployed proceeds from the Company’s capital raising efforts, in addition to unallocated investment related gains and losses. Corporate expenses consist of the offset to capital charges allocated to the operating segments within the policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses line item, unallocated overhead and executive costs, and interest expense related to debt and the $225.0 million of 5.75% Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable trust preferred securities. Additionally, Corporate and Other includes results from RGA Technology Partners, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary that

For the three months ended For the nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
(dollars in thousands) 2007 2006 2007 2006

Revenues:

Net premiums $ 1,038 $ 468 $ 2,265 $ 1,485
Investment income, net of related expenses 26,616 19,167 70,847 37,962
Investment related gains (losses), net 247 387 (11,568 ) 3,362
Other revenues 1,484 2,673 7,084 4,790

Total revenues 29,385 22,695 68,628 47,599

Benefits and expenses:

Claims and other policy benefits 189 54 217 (977 )
Interest credited — 77 — 830
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses (8,172 ) (7,432 ) (27,395 ) (26,162 )
Other operating expenses 10,610 11,643 34,066 35,044
Interest expense 9,860 15,103 53,545 46,884
Collateral finance facility expense 13,047 13,136 38,940 13,413

Total benefits and expenses 25,534 32,581 99,373 69,032

Income (loss) before income taxes $ 3,851 $ (9,886 ) $ (30,745 ) $ (21,433 )

facility and an insignificant amount of direct insurance operations in Argentina.

~~Income before income taxes was $3.9 million for~~For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2007, compared to a loss~~March 31, (dollars in thousands)

2008 2007

Revenues:

Net premiums $ 1,886 $ 279
Investment income, net of related expenses 22,026 21,974
Investment related losses, net (371 ) (9,852 )
Other revenues 1,012 3,639

Total revenues 24,553 16,040

Benefits and expenses:

Claims and other policy benefits 2 (85 )
Policy acquisition costs and other insurance expenses (9,973 ) (10,036 )
Other operating expenses 10,830 13,458
Interest expense 23,094 20,453
Collateral finance facility expense 7,474 12,687

Total benefits and expenses 31,427 36,477

Loss before income taxes $ (6,874 ) $ (20,437 )

Loss before income taxes ~~of $9.9~~decreased $13.6 million, or 66.4%, in the ~~comparable prior-year period. The loss before income taxes increased $9.3 million for the~~ first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2007~~2008, as compared to the ~~prior year. The increase~~same period in ~~income before taxes for the third quarter~~2007. This decrease is primarily due to lower interest expense combined with additional investment income, while the increase in the loss before income taxes for the first nine months is primarily due to an increase in investment related losses. Thea $9.5 million decrease in interest expense for the third quarter is due to the reversal of $9.4 million in accrued interest expense associated with certain tax positions, which were favorably resolved during the quarter, as required under FIN 48. The increase in investment income for the third quarter is largely due to the investment of the proceeds from the issuance of $300 million in senior notes in March 2007. Contributing to the increase in investment income in the first nine months of 2007 is the impact of the Company’s investment of the proceeds from its collateral finance facility in June 2006, which is largely offset by the recognition of collateral finance facility expense. Investment income and investment related gains are the result of an allocation to other segments based upon average assets and related capital levels deemed appropriate to support their business volumes. The increase in investment related losses, ~~for~~net, a $5.2 million decrease in collateral finance facility expense and a $2.6 million decrease in other operating expenses, offset by a $2.6 million decrease in other income and a $2.6 million increase in interest expense.

Total revenues increased $8.5 million, or 53.1%, in the first ~~nine months~~quarter of ~~2007 is~~2008, as compared to the same period in 2007. This increase was due to a $9.5 million decrease in investment related losses, net, primarily due to the recognition of a $10.5 million currency translation loss in the first quarter of 2007 related to the Company’s decision to sell its direct insurance operations in Argentina. ~~The~~This increase was partially offset by a $2.6 million decrease in other income primarily due to lower returns on company owned life insurance policies.

Total benefits and expenses decreased $5.1 million, or 13.8%, in the first quarter of 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. This decrease was primarily due to a $5.2 million decrease in collateral finance facility expense due to substantially reduced variable interest rates in the current quarter. Other operating expenses decreased $2.6 million in 2008 primarily related to a decrease in equity based compensation but was offset by a $2.6 million increase in interest expense ~~for the nine months is largely related~~due to the issuance of ~~the aforementioned $300~~$300.0 million in senior ~~notes.~~notes in March 2007.

Discontinued Operations

The discontinued accident and health operations reported a loss, net of taxes, of ~~$4.3~~$5.1 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007~~2008 compared to a loss, net of taxes, of ~~$1.5~~$0.7 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2006. During~~2007. The loss in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2007,~~2008 was due to the settlement of a disputed claim in which the Company ~~commuted approximately $24.9~~paid $5.8 million in excess of ~~its obligations associated with its discontinued accident and health operations contributing $3.0 million to~~ the ~~loss for the period. As of September 30, 2007 amounts~~amount held in ~~dispute or subject to audit exceed the Company’s reserves by approximately $18.6 million.~~reserve. The calculation of the claim reserve liability for the entire portfolio of accident and health business requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported claim reserve levels. Management must make estimates and assumptions based on historical loss experience, changes in the nature of the business, anticipated outcomes of claim disputes and claims for rescission, and projected future premium run-off, all of which may affect the level of the claim reserve liability. Due to the ~~significant~~ uncertainty associated with the remaining run-off of this business, future claims settlements and other expenses, net income in future periods could be affected positively or negatively.

subsidiaries. As the Company continues its expansion efforts, RGA will continue to be dependent on these sources of liquidity.

The Company believes that it has sufficient liquidity to fund its cash needs under various scenarios that include the potential risk of the early recapture of a reinsurance treaty by the ceding company and significantly higher than expected death claims. Historically, the Company has generated positive net cash flows from operations. However, in the event of significant unanticipated cash requirements beyond normal liquidity, the Company has multiple liquidity alternatives available based on market conditions and the amount and timing of the liquidity need. These options include borrowings under committed credit facilities, secured borrowings, the ability to issue long-term debt, capital securities or common equity and, if necessary, the sale of invested assets.

Cash Flows

The Company’s net cash flows provided by operating activities for the periods ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2008 and 2007 ~~and 2006~~ were ~~$601.1~~$188.5 million and ~~$490.5~~$285.1 million, respectively. Cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of premiums received, claims paid, and working capital changes. The ~~$110.6~~$96.6 million net ~~increase~~decrease in operating cash flows ~~for~~during the ~~nine~~three months of ~~2007~~2008 compared to the same period in ~~2006~~2007 was primarily a result of ~~cash inflows related to premiums and investment income increasing more than~~ cash outflows related to claims, acquisition costs, income taxes and other operating ~~expenses.~~expenses increasing more than cash inflows related to premiums and investment income. Cash from premiums and investment income increased ~~$415.0~~$84.5 million and ~~$130.3~~decreased $19.2 million, respectively, ~~and~~but was more than offset by higher operating cash outlays of ~~$434.7~~$161.9 million for the current ~~nine~~three month period. The Company believes the short-term cash requirements of its business operations will be sufficiently met by the positive cash flows generated. Additionally, the Company believes it maintains a high quality fixed maturity portfolio ~~with positive liquidity characteristics. These securities are available for sale and could be sold~~that is saleable, if necessary, to meet the Company’s short- and long-term obligations.

Net cash used in investing activities was ~~$543.5~~$246.3 million and ~~$1,167.1~~$382.4 million in the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2007~~2008 and the comparable prior-year period, respectively. This decrease is largely related to the investment in 2007 of ~~the net proceeds from the Company’s collateral finance facility in 2006 partially offset by the investment~~$295.3 million of the net proceeds from the Company’s issuance of senior notes in March 2007. The sales and purchases of fixed maturity securities are related to the management of the Company’s investment portfolios and the investment of excess cash generated by operating and financing activities.

Net cash used in financing activities was $42.5 million in the first three months of 2008 and net cash provided by financing activities was ~~$226.6 million and $793.3~~$251.3 million in the ~~first nine months~~same period of ~~2007 and 2006, respectively. This change was due primarily to net proceeds from the Company’s collateral finance facility~~2007. Changes in ~~2006 partially offset by $100.0 million principal payments on debt in the same year. Net~~ cash provided by (used in) financing activities ~~in 2007 includes $295.3 million~~primarily relate to the issuance of ~~the net proceeds from~~equity or debt securities, borrowings or payments under the Company’s ~~issuance of senior notes in March 2007, partially offset by a $78.9 million decrease in the net borrowings under revolving~~existing credit ~~agreements. Also contributing to the decline was a decrease in~~agreements, treasury stock activity and excess deposits ~~on universal life and other investment type policies and contracts of $49.7 million.~~(payments) under investment-type contracts.

Debt and Preferred Securities

As of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company had ~~$926.7~~$925.9 million and $925.8 million, respectively, in outstanding borrowings under its debt agreements and was in compliance with all covenants under those agreements.

~~On September 24, 2007 the~~The Company ~~entered into~~maintains three revolving credit facilities. The largest is a ~~five-year,~~ syndicated ~~revolving~~ credit facility with an overall capacity of $750.0 million ~~replacing its $600.0 million five-year revolving credit facility, which was scheduled to mature~~that expires in September ~~2010.~~2012. The Company may borrow cash and may obtain letters of credit in multiple currencies under ~~the new~~this facility. Interest on borrowings is based either on the prime, federal funds or LIBOR rates plus a base rate margin defined in the agreement. Fees payable for the credit facility depend upon the Company’s senior

~~unsecured long-term debt rating.~~ As of ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, the Company had no cash borrowings outstanding and ~~$305.0~~$358.0 million in issued, but undrawn, letters of credit under this ~~new~~ facility. ~~The credit agreement is unsecured but contains affirmative, negative and financial covenants customary for financings of this type.~~ The Company’s other credit facilities consist of a £15.0 million credit facility that expires in May ~~2008,~~2009, with an outstanding balance of ~~$30.7~~$29.8 million as of ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, and an A$50.0 million Australian credit facility that expires in ~~June~~March 2011, with no outstanding balance as of ~~September 30, 2007.~~

As of ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, the average interest rate on all long-term and short-term debt outstanding, excluding the Company-obligated mandatorily redeemable preferred securities of subsidiary trust holding solely junior subordinated debentures of the Company (“Trust Preferred Securities”), was 6.37%. Interest is expensed on the face amount, or $225 million, of the Trust Preferred Securities at a rate of 5.75%.

Collateral Finance Facility

In June 2006, RGA’s subsidiary, Timberlake Financial, L.L.C. (“Timberlake Financial”), issued $850.0 million of Series A Floating Rate Insured Notes due June 2036 in a private placement. The notes were issued to fund the collateral requirements for statutory reserves required by the U.S. ~~valuation~~Valuation of Life Policies Model Regulation (commonly referred to as Regulation XXX) on specified term life insurance policies reinsured by RGA Reinsurance ~~Company.~~Company (“RGA Reinsurance”). Proceeds from the notes, along with a ~~$112.7~~$112.8 million direct investment by the Company, have been deposited into a series of trust accounts that collateralize the notes and are not available to satisfy the general obligations of the Company. Interest on the

notes will accrue at an annual rate of 1-month LIBOR plus a base rate margin, payable monthly. The payment of interest and principal on the notes is insured by a monoline insurance company through a financial guaranty insurance ~~policy with a third party.~~policy. The notes represent senior, secured indebtedness of Timberlake Financial ~~with no~~without legal recourse to RGA or its other subsidiaries. Timberlake Financial will rely primarily upon the receipt of interest and principal payments on a surplus note and dividend payments from its wholly-owned subsidiary, Timberlake Reinsurance Company II (“Timberlake Re”), a South Carolina captive insurance company, to make payments of interest and principal on the notes. The ability of Timberlake Re to make interest and principal payments on the surplus note and dividend payments to Timberlake Financial is contingent upon South Carolina regulatory approval and the performance of specified term life insurance policies with guaranteed level premiums retroceded by RGA’s subsidiary, RGA Reinsurance, ~~Company,~~ to Timberlake Re.

Asset / Liability Management

The Company actively manages its assets using an approach that is intended to balance quality, diversification, asset/liability matching, liquidity and investment return. The goals of the investment process are to optimize after-tax, risk-adjusted investment income and after-tax, risk-adjusted total return while managing the assets and liabilities on a cash flow and duration basis.

The Company has established target asset portfolios for each major insurance product, which represent the investment strategies intended to profitably fund its liabilities within acceptable risk parameters. These strategies include objectives for effective duration, yield curve sensitivity and convexity, liquidity, asset sector concentration and credit quality.

The Company’s liquidity position (cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments) was ~~$604.8~~$350.4 million and ~~$300.7~~$479.4 million at ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 and December 31, ~~2006,~~2007, respectively. The ~~increase~~decrease in the Company’s liquidity position from December 31, ~~2006~~2007 is primarily due to the timing of ~~third~~first quarter investment activity. Liquidity needs are determined from valuation analyses conducted by operational units and are driven by product portfolios. Periodic evaluations of demand liabilities and short-term liquid assets are designed to adjust specific portfolios, as well as their durations and maturities, in response to anticipated liquidity needs.

The Company ~~occasionally enters~~has entered into sales of investment securities under agreements to repurchase the same securities. These arrangements are used for purposes of short-term financing. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, the book value of securities subject to ~~increase~~these agreements, and included in fixed maturity securities was $62.0 million and $30.1 million, while the ~~Company’s earned yield on invested assets. These transactions~~repurchase obligations of $62.0 million and $30.1 million were reported in other liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position. The Company also occasionally enters into arrangements to purchase securities under agreements to resell the same securities. Amounts outstanding, if any, are reported in cash and cash equivalents. These agreements are primarily used as ~~securitized~~

~~lending obligations within~~yield enhancement alternatives to other ~~liabilities.~~cash equivalent investments. There ~~were $62.6 million of these agreements outstanding at September 30, 2007 and there~~ were no agreements outstanding at March 31, 2008 and December 31, ~~2006.~~2007. Further, the Company often enters into securities lending agreements whereby certain securities are loaned to third parties, primarily major brokerage firms, in order to earn additional yield. The Company requires a minimum of 102% of the fair value of the loaned securities as collateral in the form of either cash or securities held by the Company or a trust. The cash collateral is reported in cash and the offsetting collateral re-payment obligation is reported in other liabilities. The Company had securities lending agreements outstanding of $21.3 million at March 31, 2008. There were no securities lending agreements outstanding at December 31, 2007.

RGA Reinsurance is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Des Moines (“FHLB”) and holds $11.8 million of common stock of the FHLB, which is included in other invested assets on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets. RGA Reinsurance occasionally enters into funding agreements with the FHLB but had no outstanding funding agreements with the FHLB at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

Future Liquidity and Capital Needs

Based on the historic cash flows and the current financial results of the Company, subject to any dividend limitations which may be imposed by various insurance regulations, management believes RGA’s cash flows from operating activities, together with undeployed proceeds from its capital raising efforts, including interest and investment income on those proceeds, interest income received on surplus notes with two operating subsidiaries, and its ability to raise funds in the capital markets, will be sufficient to enable RGA to make dividend payments to its shareholders, to make interest payments on its senior indebtedness, trust preferred securities and junior subordinated notes, repurchase RGA common stock under the board of director approved plan and meet its other obligations.

A general economic downturn or a downturn in the equity and other capital markets could adversely affect the market for many annuity and life insurance products. Because the Company obtains substantially all of its revenues through reinsurance

arrangements that cover a portfolio of life insurance products, as well as annuities, its business would be harmed if the market for annuities or life insurance were adversely affected.

Investments

The Company had total cash and invested assets of ~~$16.3~~$16.6 billion and ~~$14.8~~$16.8 billion at ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 and December 31, ~~2006, respectively.~~ 2007, respectively, as illustrated below (dollars in thousands):

March 31, 2008 December 31, 2007
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale $ 9,387,094 $ 9,397,916
Mortgage loans on real estate 812,539 831,557
Policy loans 1,039,464 1,059,439
Funds withheld at interest 4,650,948 4,749,496
Short-term investments 46,336 75,062
Other invested assets 389,437 284,220
Cash and cash equivalents 304,083 404,351

Total cash and invested assets $ 16,629,901 $ 16,802,041

The following table presents consolidated invested assets, net investment income and investment yield, excluding funds withheld. Funds withheld assets are primarily associated with the reinsurance of annuity contracts on which the Company earns a spread. Fluctuations in the yield on funds withheld assets are generally offset by a corresponding adjustment to the interest credited on the liabilities (dollars in thousands).

March 31,
Increase/
2008 2007 (Decrease)
Average invested assets at amortized cost $ 11,539,433 $ 10,252,317 12.6 %
Net investment income 170,899 148,820 14.8 %

Investment yield (ratio of net investment income to average invested assets) 6.06 % 5.93 % 13 bps

All investments ~~made~~held by RGA and its subsidiaries ~~conform~~are monitored for conformance to the qualitative and quantitative limits prescribed by the applicable jurisdiction’s insurance laws and regulations. In addition, the operating companies’ boards of directors ~~of the various operating companies~~ periodically review ~~the investment portfolios of~~ their respective ~~subsidiaries. RGA’s board of directors also receives reports on material~~ investment portfolios. The Company’s investment strategy is to maintain a predominantly investment-grade, fixed maturity portfolio, to provide adequate liquidity for expected reinsurance obligations, and to maximize total return through prudent asset management. The Company’s ~~earned yield~~asset/liability duration matching differs between operating segments. Based on Canadian reserve requirements, a portion of the Canadian liabilities is strictly matched with long-duration Canadian assets, with the remaining assets invested ~~assets, excluding funds withheld, was 6.00% in~~to maximize the ~~third quarter~~total rate of ~~2007, compared with 5.79%~~return, given the characteristics of the corresponding liabilities and Company liquidity needs. The duration of the Canadian portfolio exceeds twenty years. The duration for all the ~~third quarter of 2006.~~Company’s portfolios when consolidated range between eight and ten years. See ~~“Note~~Note 4 ~~— Investments”~~– “Investments” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of the ~~2006~~2007 Annual Report for additional information regarding the Company’s investments.

The Company’s fixed maturity securities are invested primarily in commercial and industrial bonds, public utilities, U.S. and Canadian government securities, as well as mortgage- and asset-backed securities. As of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, approximately 97.1% and 97.2%, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated investment portfolio of fixed maturity securities was investment grade. Important factors in the selection of investments include diversification, quality, yield, total rate of return potential and call protection. The relative importance of these factors is determined by market conditions and the underlying product or portfolio characteristics. Cash equivalents are invested in high-grade money market instruments. The largest asset class in which fixed maturities were invested was in corporate securities, including commercial, industrial, finance and utility bonds, which represented approximately ~~54.8%~~46.8% of fixed maturity securities as of ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008, compared to 46.5% at December 31, 2007. Corporate securities are diversified by sector, with the majority in finance,

commercial and ~~had an~~industrial bonds. The average Standard ~~and~~& Poor’s (“S&P”) rating of ~~“A”~~the Company’s corporate securities was “A-“ at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

The fair value of publicly traded fixed maturity securities are based upon quoted market prices or estimates from independent pricing services with oversight from the Company. Private placement fixed maturity securities fair values are based on the credit quality and duration of marketable securities deemed comparable by the Company’s investment advisor, which may be of another issuer. The NAIC assigns securities quality ratings and uniform valuations called “NAIC Designations” which are used by insurers when preparing their annual statements. The NAIC assigns designations to publicly traded as well as privately placed securities. The designations assigned by the NAIC range from class 1 to class 6, with designations in classes 1 and 2 generally considered investment grade (BBB or higher rating agency designation). NAIC designations in classes 3 through 6 are generally considered below investment grade (BB or lower rating agency designation).

As of March 31, 2008, the Company classified approximately 16.1% of its fixed maturity securities in the Level 3 category in accordance with SFAS 157 (refer to Note 5 – “Fair Value Disclosures” in the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information). These securities primarily consist of private placement corporate securities with an inactive trading market and securities for which the Company relies on broker quotes to determine fair value. Additionally, the Company has included asset-backed securities with subprime exposure in the Level 3 category due to the current market uncertainty associated with these securities.

The quality of the Company’s available-for-sale fixed maturity securities portfolio, as measured at fair value and by the percentage of fixed maturity securities invested in various ratings categories, relative to the entire available-for-sale fixed maturity security portfolio, at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 was as follows (dollars in thousands):

March 31, 2008 December 31, 2007
NAIC Rating Agency Amortized Estimated % of Amortized Estimated % of
Designation Designation Cost Fair Value Total Cost Fair Value Total
1 AAA/AA/A $ 7,127,035 $ 7,436,088 79.2 % $ 7,022,497 $ 7,521,177 80.0 %
2 BBB 1,725,432 1,676,870 17.8 % 1,628,431 1,617,983 17.2 %
3 BB 222,209 214,105 2.3 % 201,868 198,487 2.1 %
4 B 48,225 43,989 0.5 % 47,013 43,680 0.5 %
5 CCC and lower 16,860 15,987 0.2 % 16,800 16,502 0.2 %
6 In or near default 53 55 — 83 87 —

Total $ 9,139,814 $ 9,387,094 100.0 % $ 8,916,692 $ 9,397,916 100.0 %

Within the fixed maturity security portfolio, the Company held approximately $1.3 billion and $1.4 billion in residential mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, which include agency-issued pass-through securities, collateralized mortgage obligations guaranteed or otherwise supported by the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, Federal National Mortgage Association, or the Government National Mortgage Association. As of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, almost all of these securities were investment-grade. Additionally, the Company held $686.7 million and $645.2 million in investment-grade commercial mortgage-backed securities at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The principal risks inherent in holding mortgage-backed securities are prepayment and extension risks, which will affect the timing of when cash will be received and are dependent on the level of mortgage interest rates. Prepayment risk is the unexpected increase in principal payments, primarily as a result of owner refinancing. Extension risk relates to the unexpected slowdown in principal payments. In addition, mortgage-backed securities face default risk should the borrower be unable to pay the contractual interest or principal on their obligation. The Company monitors its mortgage-backed securities to mitigate exposure to the cash flow uncertainties associated with these risks.

Within the fixed maturity security portfolio, the Company held approximately $446.0 million and $464.3 million in asset-backed securities at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, which include credit card and automobile receivables, home equity loans, manufactured housing bonds and collateralized bond obligations. The Company’s asset-backed securities are diversified by issuer and contain both floating and fixed rate securities. The Company owns floating rate securities that represent approximately ~~19.0%~~19.8% and 19.2% of the total fixed maturity securities at ~~September 30, 2007.~~March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. These investments have a higher degree of income variability than the other fixed income

holdings in the portfolio due to the floating rate nature of the interest payments. The Company holds these investments to match specific floating rate liabilities primarily reflected in the condensed consolidated balance sheets as collateral finance facility.

Within the fixed maturity security portfolio, the Company holds approximately $463.9 million in asset-backed securities at September 30, 2007, which include credit card and automobile receivables, home equity loans, manufactured housing bonds and collateralized bond obligations. The Company’s asset-backed securities are diversified by issuer and contain both floating and fixed rate securities. In addition to the risks associated with floating rate securities, principal risks in holding asset-backed securities are structural, credit and capital market risks. Structural risks include the securities’ priority in the issuer’s capital structure, the adequacy of and ability to realize proceeds from collateral, and the potential for prepayments. Credit risks include consumer or corporate credits such as credit card holders, equipment lessees, and corporate obligors. Capital market risks include general level of interest rates and the liquidity for these securities in the marketplace.

As of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the Company held investments in securities with subprime mortgage exposure with an amortized ~~cost~~costs totaling ~~$270.4~~$255.4 million and an$267.7 million, and estimated fair ~~value~~values of ~~$255.0 million.~~$221.6 million and $246.8 million, respectively. Those amounts include exposure to subprime mortgages

through securities held directly in the Company’s investment portfolios within asset-backed securities, as well as securities backing the Company’s funds withheld at interest investment. The securities are highly rated with a weighted average S&P credit ~~rating~~ratings of ~~“AA”.~~approximately “AA+” at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Additionally, the Company has largely avoided investing in securities originated in the second half of 2005 and beyond, which management believes was a period of lessened underwriting quality. The majority of the Company’s holdings are originations from 2005 and prior periods. In light of the high credit quality of the portfolio, the Company does not expect to realize any material losses despite the recent increase in default rates and market concern over future performance of this asset class. Additionally, the recent series of rating agency downgrades of securities in this sector did not significantly affect the Company’s exposure as the Company experienced only one downgrade within its portfolio of securities. The following ~~table presents a summary of~~tables summarize the securities by rating and underwriting year at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 (dollars in thousands):

S&P Rating Amortized Cost Fair Value % of Fair Value
AAA $ 117,789 $ 115,212 45.3 %
AA 110,002 102,557 40.2 %
A 41,430 36,075 14.1 %
BBB 1,215 1,121 0.4 %

Total $ 270,436 $ 254,965 100.0 %

March 31, 2008
AAA AA A
Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value
2003 & Prior $ 16,021 $ 16,258 $ 1,487 $ 1,396 $ 3,684 $ 3,272
2004 15,262 13,175 33,731 27,870 16,147 14,687
2005 52,295 47,580 52,680 46,487 21,595 15,846
2006 13,718 11,371 — — — —
2007 11,436 9,885 — — 10,501 8,332

Total $ 108,732 $ 98,269 $ 87,898 $ 75,753 $ 51,927 $ 42,137

BBB Below Investment Grade Total
Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value
2003 & Prior $ 1,188 $ 1,052 $ — $ — $ 22,380 $ 21,978
2004 — — — — 65,140 55,732
2005 2,555 1,269 — — 129,125 111,182
2006 3,137 3,146 — — 16,855 14,517
2007 — — — — 21,937 18,217

Total $ 6,880 $ 5,467 $ — $ — $ 255,437 $ 221,626

December 31, 2007
AAA AA A
Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value
2003 & Prior $ 16,520 $ 16,531 $ 2,111 $ 1,910 $ 3,749 $ 3,246
2004 26,520 26,286 33,757 31,465 16,151 14,614
2005 41,638 40,190 60,233 55,041 21,593 18,140
2006 13,964 11,957 5,002 3,763 — —
2007 20,274 18,351 — — — —

Total $ 118,916 $ 113,315 $ 101,103 $ 92,179 $ 41,493 $ 36,000

BBB Below Investment Grade Total
Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value Amortized Cost Fair Value
2003 & Prior $ 1,186 $ 1,046 $ — $ — $ 23,566 $ 22,733
2004 — — — — 76,428 72,365
2005 5,026 4,250 — — 128,490 117,621
2006 — — — — 18,966 15,720
2007 — — — — 20,274 18,351

Total $ 6,212 $ 5,296 $ — $ — $ 267,724 $ 246,790

The Company’s fixed maturity and funds withheld portfolios include approximately $655.6 million in amortized cost of securities that are insured by various financial guarantors, or less than five percent of consolidated investments. The securities are diversified between municipal bonds and asset-backed securities with well diversified collateral pools. The Company invests in insured collateralized debt obligation (“CDO”) structures backing subprime investments of approximately $0.7 million at March 31, 2008. The insured securities are primarily investment grade without the benefit of the insurance provided by the financial guarantor and therefore the Company does not expect to incur significant realized losses as a result of the recent financial difficulties encountered by several of the financial guarantors. In addition to the insured securities, the Company held investment-grade securities issued by four of the financial guarantors totaling $21.9 million in amortized cost.

The Company monitors its fixed maturity securities to determine impairments in value and evaluates factors such as financial condition of the issuer, payment performance, the length of time and the extent to which the market value has been below amortized cost, compliance with covenants, general market conditions and industry sector, current intent and ability to hold securities and various other subjective factors. Based on management’s judgment, securities determined to have an other-than-temporary impairment in value are written down to fair value. The Company recorded ~~$4.7~~$5.2 million in other-than-temporary write-downs on fixed maturity securities for the ~~nine~~three months ~~ending September 30, 2007.~~ended March 31, 2008. The Company recorded ~~$1.1~~$0.6 million in other-than-temporary write-downs on fixed maturity securities for the ~~nine~~three months ~~ending September 30, 2006.~~ended March 31, 2007. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2008 and 2007, the Company sold fixed maturity securities and equity securities with a fair values of $141.3 million and $238.8 million at losses of $8.9 million and $6.1 million, respectively, or at 94.1% and 97.5% of book value, ~~of $910.1 million, which were below amortized cost, at a loss of $32.1 million.~~respectively. Generally, such losses are insignificant in relation to the cost basis of the investment and are largely due to changes in interest rates from the time the security was purchased. The securities are classified as available-for-sale in order to meet the Company’s operational and other cash flow requirements. The Company does not engage in short-term buying and selling of securities to generate gains or losses.

The following table presents the total gross unrealized losses for ~~1,302~~1,290 and 1,105 fixed maturity securities and equity securities as of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, where the estimated fair value had declined and remained below amortized cost by the indicated amount (dollars in thousands):

As of March 31, 2008
Equal to or greater than
Less than 12 months 12 months Total
Gross Gross Gross
Estimated Fair Unrealized Estimated Unrealized Estimated Fair Unrealized
(dollars in thousands) Value Loss Fair Value Loss Value Loss
Investment grade securities:

U.S. corporate securities
$ 1,364,148 $ 105,669 $ 506,480 $ 47,912 $ 1,870,628 $ 153,581
Canadian and Canadian provincial governments
144,448 2,924 25,089 1,258 169,537 4,182
Residential mortgage-backed securities
389,755 16,616 167,342 10,276 557,097 26,892
Foreign corporate securities
396,425 34,494 171,394 11,633 567,819 46,127
Asset-backed securities
271,240 37,976 93,824 12,040 365,064 50,016
Commercial mortgage-backed securities
473,862 40,214 44,599 3,111 518,461 43,325
State and political subdivisions
25,820 2,035 11,554 3,302 37,374 5,337
Other foreign government securities
95,418 1,321 57,301 1,765 152,719 3,086

Investment grade securities
$ 3,161,116 241,249 1,077,583 91,297 4,238,699 332,546

Non-investment grade securities:

U.S. corporate securities
131,232 12,660 34,045 2,228 165,277 14,888
Asset-backed securities
1,330 2 — — 1,330 2
Foreign corporate securities
10,051 1,885 3,420 237 13,471 2,122

Non-investment grade securities
142,613 14,547 37,465 2,465 180,078 17,012

Total fixed maturity securities
$ 3,303,729 $ 255,796 $ 1,115,048 $ 93,762 $ 4,418,777 $ 349,558

Equity securities
$ 124,771 $ 20,286 $ 7,061 $ 1,457 $ 131,832 $ 21,743

Total number of securities in an unrealized loss position
912 378 1,290


	As of September 30, 2007												As of December 31, 2007
	Equal to or greater than																Equal to or greater than
	Less than 12 months				12 months				Total				Less than 12 months				12 months				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross				Gross				Gross				Gross
	Estimated Fair		Unrealized		Estimated Fair		Unrealized		Estimated Fair		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized
(dollars in thousands)	Value		Loss		Value		Loss		Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss
Investment grade securities:
Commercial and industrial	$	647,958	$	22,218	$	346,806	$	14,616	$	994,764	$	36,834
Public utilities		263,391		8,341		98,250		5,937		361,641		14,278
U.S. corporate securities													$	1,185,664	$	63,368	$	487,626	$	25,541	$	1,673,290	$	88,909
Canadian and Canadian provincial governments														78,045		1,077		4,313		86		82,358		1,163
Residential mortgage-backed securities														299,655		5,473		348,632		6,743		648,287		12,216
Foreign corporate securities														293,783		17,880		155,445		5,995		449,228		23,875
Asset-backed securities		335,899		13,580		58,127		3,625		394,026		17,205		341,337		24,958		72,445		5,722		413,782		30,680
Canadian and Canadian provincial governments		237,113		13,273		—		—		237,113		13,273
Mortgage-backed securities		993,463		16,379		402,377		9,993		1,395,840		26,372
Finance		1,068,813		38,418		97,160		3,761		1,165,973		42,179
Commercial mortgage-backed securities														110,097		4,499		46,647		588		156,744		5,087
U.S. government and agencies		—		—		695		7		695		7		700		1		—		—		700		1
State and political subdivisions		29,924		672		17,258		564		47,182		1,236		27,265		605		14,518		339		41,783		944
Foreign governments		195,966		5,045		—		—		195,966		5,045
Other foreign government securities														127,397		1,635		75,354		2,878		202,751		4,513

Investment grade securities		3,772,527		117,926		1,020,673		38,503		4,793,200		156,429		2,463,943		119,496		1,204,980		47,892		3,668,923		167,388


Non-investment grade securities:
Commercial and industrial		74,954		3,045		31,987		1,418		106,941		4,463
Finance		9,141		1,393		—		—		9,141		1,393
Public utilities		22,049		529		1,531		36		23,580		565
U.S. corporate securities														106,842		6,044		30,105		1,727		136,947		7,771
Asset-backed securities														1,996		776		—		—		1,996		776
Foreign corporate securities														9,692		1,930		3,524		165		13,216		2,095

Non-investment grade securities		106,144		4,967		33,518		1,454		139,662		6,421		118,530		8,750		33,629		1,892		152,159		10,642

Total fixed maturity securities	$	3,878,671	$	122,893	$	1,054,191	$	39,957	$	4,932,862	$	162,850	$	2,582,473	$	128,246	$	1,238,609	$	49,784	$	3,821,082	$	178,030

Equity securities	$	104,895	$	8,486	$	15,211	$	1,538	$	120,106	$	10,024	$	83,166	$	16,764	$	19,073	$	3,421	$	102,239	$	20,185

Total number of securities in an unrealized loss position														691				414				1,105

treaty terms. The Company is subject to the investment performance on the withheld assets, although it does not directly control them. These assets are primarily fixed maturity investment securities and pose risks similar to the fixed maturity securities the Company owns. The underlying portfolios also include options related to equity indexed annuity products. The market value changes associated with these investments ~~has~~have caused some volatility in reported investment income. This is largely offset by a corresponding change in interest credited, with minimal impact on income before taxes. To mitigate risk, the Company helps set the investment guidelines followed by the ceding company and monitors compliance. Ceding companies with funds withheld at interest had ~~a minimum A.M. Best~~an average rating of ~~“A”.~~“A+” at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007. Certain ceding companies maintain segregated portfolios for the benefit of the Company.

Other invested assets represented approximately ~~1.7%~~2.3% and ~~1.5%~~1.7% of the Company’s cash and invested assets as of ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 and December 31, ~~2006,~~2007, respectively. Other invested assets include ~~common stock,~~derivative contracts, equity securities, preferred stocks, ~~restricted cash and cash equivalents~~structured loans and limited partnership interests. The Company did not record an other-than-temporary write-down on its investments in limited partnerships in the first ~~nine~~three months of 2008 or 2007. ~~The Company recorded other-than-temporary writedowns of $3.1 million on its investments in limited partnerships in the nine months ended September 30, 2006.~~

Contractual Obligations

~~Future policy benefits and other policy claims and benefits increased since~~Since December 31, ~~2006 by $3,459.7 million and $223.6 million, respectively, to $26,102.2 million and $2,050.4 million at September 30,~~ 2007, ~~respectively. The Company’s commitment to fund limited partnerships has increased since December 31, 2006 by $78.0 million to $110.7 million at September 30, 2007. Additionally,~~the value of the Company’s obligation for ~~long-term debt,~~collateral finance facility, including interest, ~~increased primarily~~decreased by $229.4 million due to substantially reduced variable interest rates in the ~~March 2007 issuance of senior notes~~current quarter as previously discussed. There were no other material changes in the Company’s contractual obligations from that reported in the ~~2006~~2007 Annual Report.

Mortality Risk Management

In the event that mortality or morbidity experience develops in excess of expectations, some reinsurance treaties allow for increases to future premium rates. Other treaties include experience refund provisions, which may also help reduce RGA’s mortality risk. In the normal course of business, the Company seeks to limit its exposure to loss on any single insured and to recover a portion of ~~benefits~~claims paid by ceding reinsurance to other insurance enterprises or retrocessionaires under excess coverage and coinsurance contracts. In the U.S., the Company retains a maximum of ~~$6.0~~$8.0 million of coverage per individual life. In certain limited situations, due to the acquisition of in force blocks of business, the Company has retained more than ~~$6.0~~$8.0 million per individual policy. In total, there are 4622 such cases of over-retained policies, for amounts averaging ~~$2.7~~$1.7 million over the Company’s normal retention limit. The largest amount ~~over retained~~over-retained on any one life is ~~$12.1~~$10.1 million. The Company has mitigated the risk related to the over-retained policies by entering into one-year agreements with other reinsurers that commenced in September and October of 2007. For other countries, particularly those with higher risk factors or smaller books of business, the Company systematically reduces its retention. The Company has a number of retrocession arrangements whereby certain business in force is retroceded on an automatic or facultative basis.

The Company maintains a catastrophe insurance program (“Program”) that renews on September 7th of each year. The current Program began September 7, 2007, and covers events involving 10 or more insured deaths from a single occurrence. The Company retains the first $10 million in claims, the Program covers the next $40 million in claims, and the Company retains all claims in excess of $50 million. The Program covers reinsurance programs ~~world-wide~~worldwide and includes losses due to acts of terrorism, including terrorism losses due to nuclear, chemical and/or biological events. The Program excludes losses from earthquakes occurring in ~~California.~~California and also excludes losses from pandemics. The Program is insured by nine insurance companies and Lloyd’s Syndicates, with no single entity providing more than $10 million of coverage.

Counterparty Risk

In the normal course of business, the Company seeks to limit its exposure to reinsurance contracts by ceding a portion of the reinsurance to other insurance companies or reinsurers. Should a counterparty not be able to fulfill its obligation to the

rated, letters of credit or trust assets have been given as additional security in favor of RGA Reinsurance. In addition, the Company performs annual financial and in force reviews of its retrocessionaires to evaluate financial stability and performance.

The Company has never experienced a material default in connection with retrocession arrangements, nor has it experienced any material difficulty in collecting claims recoverable from retrocessionaires; however, no assurance can be given as to the future performance of such retrocessionaires or as to the recoverability of any such claims.

The Company relies upon its clients to provide timely, accurate information. The Company may experience volatility in its earnings as a result of erroneous or untimely reporting from its clients. The Company works closely with its clients and monitors this risk in an effort to minimize its exposure.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss that may occur when fluctuations in interest and currency exchange rates and equity and commodity prices change the value of a financial instrument. ~~Both~~Since both derivative and nonderivative financial instruments have market risk, so the Company’s risk management extends beyond derivatives to encompass all financial instruments ~~held that are sensitive to market risk.~~held. The Company is primarily exposed to interest rate risk and foreign currency risk.

Interest rate risk arises from many of the Company’s primary activities, as the Company invests substantial funds in interest-sensitive assets and also has certain interest-sensitive contract liabilities. The Company manages interest rate risk and credit risk to maximize the return on the Company’s capital effectively and to preserve the value created by its business operations. As such, certain management monitoring processes are designed to minimize the impact of sudden and sustained changes in interest rates on fair value, cash flows, and ~~net~~ interest income.

The Company is subject to foreign currency translation, transaction, and net income exposure. The Company ~~generally does not~~manages its exposure to currency principally by matching invested assets with the underlying reinsurance liabilities to the extent possible. The Company has in place a net investment hedge ~~the foreign currency translation exposure related to~~of a portion of its investment in ~~foreign subsidiaries as it views these investments to be long-term.~~Canada operations. Translation differences resulting from translating foreign subsidiary balances to U.S. dollars are reflected in ~~equity.~~stockholders’ equity on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The Company generally does not hedge the foreign currency exposure of its subsidiaries transacting business in currencies other than their functional currency (transaction exposure). The majority of the Company’s foreign currency transactions are denominated in Australian dollars, British pounds, Canadian dollars, Japanese yen, Korean won, the South African rand and euros.

There has been no significant change in the Company’s quantitative or qualitative aspects of market risk during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2007~~March 31, 2008 from that disclosed in the ~~2006~~2007 Annual Report.

New Accounting Standards

In February 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 140-3, “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and ~~penalties, the disallowance~~Repurchase Financing Transactions” (“FSP 140-3”). FSP 140-3 provides guidance for evaluating whether to account for a transfer of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefitsa financial asset and repurchase financing as ~~of January 1, 2007 that would affect the effective tax rate if recognized was $26.4 million. The Company also had $29.8 million of accrued interest,~~a single transaction or as ~~of January 1, 2007. The Company classifies interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense, while penalties are included within income tax expense.~~two separate transactions. FSP 140-3 is

3335

effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company ~~files income tax returns in~~is currently evaluating the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and non U.S. jurisdictions. With a few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2003.

Asimpact of September 30, 2007, the Company’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $196.3 million, which is unchanged from the amount recorded as of the date of adoption. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefit included that would affect the effective tax rate, if recognized, was approximately $25.7 million, a decrease of approximately $0.7 million from the amount recorded as of the date of adoption. The net decrease was primarily due to tax issues that were effectively settled in the current quarter. As a result of these settlements, items within the liability for unrecognized tax benefits were reclassified to current and deferred taxes, as applicable.

Effective January 1, 2007, the Company adopted the provisions of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) Issue 06-5. This issue, titled “Accounting for the Purchases of Life Insurance — Determining the Amount That Could Be Realized in Accordance with FASB Technical Bulletin No. 85-4”, clarified that the amount of the DAC receivable beyond one year generally must be discounted to present value under Accounting Principles Board Opinion 21. The adoption of EITF Issue 06-05 did not have a material impactFSP 140-3 on ~~the Company’s~~its condensed consolidated financial statements.

Effective January 1, ~~2007,~~2008, the Company adopted Statement of Position (“SOP”) 05-1, “Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges of Insurance Contracts” (“SOP 05-1”). SOP 05-1 provides guidance on accounting by insurance enterprises for DAC on internal replacements of insurance and investment contracts other than those specifically described in SFAS No. ~~97, “Accounting~~157. SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and ~~Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Long-Duration Contracts and for Realized Gains and Losses~~requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. The adoption of SFAS 157 resulted in a pre-tax gain of approximately $3.9 million, included in interest credited, related primarily to the decrease in the fair value of liability embedded derivatives associated with equity-indexed annuity products primarily from the ~~Sale~~incorporation of ~~Investments”~~nonperformance risk, also referred to as the Company’s own credit risk, into the fair value calculation.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), “Business Combinations — A Replacement of FASB Statement No. 141” (“SFAS 141(r)”) and SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — An Amendment of ARB No. 51” (“SFAS 160”). ~~SOP 05-1 defines~~SFAS 141(r) establishes principles and requirements for how an ~~internal replacement~~acquirer recognizes and measures certain items in a business combination, as ~~a modification in product benefits, features, rights, or coverages that occurs by~~well as disclosures about the ~~exchange~~nature and financial effects of a ~~contract for~~business combination. SFAS 160 establishes accounting and reporting standards surrounding noncontrolling interest, or minority interests, which are the portions of equity in a ~~new contract,~~subsidiary not attributable, directly or ~~by amendment, endorsement, or rider~~indirectly, to a ~~contract, or by the election of a feature or coverage within a contract. SOP 05-1 is~~parent. The pronouncements are effective for ~~internal replacements occurring in~~ fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, ~~2006. In addition, in February 2007,~~2008 and apply prospectively to business combinations. Presentation and disclosure requirements related to noncontrolling interests must be retrospectively applied. The Company is currently evaluating the ~~American Institute~~impact of ~~Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”) issued related Technical Practice Aids (“TPAs”) to provide further clarification~~SFAS 141(r) on its accounting for future acquisitions and the impact of ~~SOP 05-1. The TPAs are effective concurrently with the adoption of the SOP. The adoption of SOP 05-1 and related TPAs did not have a material impact~~SFAS 160 on ~~the Company’s~~its condensed consolidated financial statements.

Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, among others, statements relating to projections of the strategies, earnings, revenues, income or loss, ratios, future financial performance, and growth potential of the Company. The words “intend,” “expect,” “project,” “estimate,” “predict,” “anticipate,” “should,” “believe,” and other similar expressions also are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified. Future events and actual results, performance, and achievements could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by, or underlying the forward-looking statements.

Numerous important factors could cause actual results and events to differ materially from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements including, without limitation, (1) adverse changes in mortality, morbidity, lapsation or claims experience, (2) changes in the Company’s financial strength and credit ratings or those of MetLife, Inc. (“MetLife”), the beneficial owner of a majority of the Company’s common shares, or its subsidiaries, and the effect of such changes on the Company’s future results of operations and financial condition, (3) inadequate risk analysis and underwriting, (4) general economic conditions or a prolonged economic downturn affecting the demand for insurance and reinsurance in the Company’s current and planned markets, (5) the availability and cost of collateral necessary for regulatory reserves and capital, (6) market or economic conditions that adversely affect the Company’s ability to make timely sales of investment securities, (7) risks inherent in the Company’s risk management and investment strategy, including changes in investment portfolio yields due to interest rate or credit quality changes, (8) fluctuations in U.S. or foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates, or securities and real estate markets, (9) adverse litigation or arbitration results, (10) the adequacy of reserves, resources and accurate information relating to settlements, awards and terminated and discontinued lines of business, (11) the stability of and actions by governments and economies in the markets in which the Company operates, (12) competitive factors and competitors’ responses to the Company’s initiatives, (13) the success of the Company’s clients, (14) successful execution of the Company’s entry into new markets, (15) successful development and introduction of new products and distribution opportunities, (16) the Company’s ability to successfully integrate and operate reinsurance business that the Company acquires, (17) regulatory action that may be taken by state Departments of Insurance with respect to the Company, MetLife, or its subsidiaries, (18) the Company’s dependence on third parties, including those insurance companies and reinsurers to which the Company cedes some reinsurance, third-party investment managers and others, (19) the threat of

even though the Company’s situation may change in the future. The Company qualifies all of its forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements. For a discussion of these risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking statements, you are advised to see Item 1A Risk Factors of the ~~2006~~2007 Annual Report.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

See “Item 2 —– Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations —– Market Risk” which is included herein.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II -— OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is currently a party to three arbitrations that involve its discontinued accident and health business, including personal accident business (which includes London market excess of loss business) and workers’ compensation carve-out business. The Company is also party to a threatened arbitration related to its life reinsurance business. As of ~~September 30, 2007,~~March 31, 2008, the ~~parties~~party involved in ~~these actions have~~this action has raised ~~claims, or established reserves that may result in claims,~~a claim in the amount of ~~$24.3~~$4.9 million, which is ~~$23.5~~$4.9 million in excess of the ~~amounts~~amount held in reserve by the Company. The Company generally has little information regarding any reserves established by the ceding companies, and must rely on management estimates to establish policy claim liabilities. It is possible that any such reserves could be increased in the future. The Company believes it has substantial defenses upon which to contest ~~these claims,~~this claim, including but not limited to misrepresentation and breach of contract by direct and indirect ceding companies. ~~See Note 20, “Discontinued Operations” in the Company’s consolidated financial statements accompanying the 2006 Annual Report for more information.~~ Additionally, from time to time, the Company is subject to litigation related to employment-related matters in the normal course of its business. The Company cannot predict or determine the ultimate outcome of the pending litigation or arbitrations or provide useful ranges of potential losses. It is the opinion of management, after consultation with counsel, that their outcomes, after consideration of the provisions made in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements, would not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position. However, it is possible that an adverse outcome could, from time to time, have a material adverse effect on the Company’s consolidated net income in a particular ~~quarter or year.~~reporting period.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s ~~2006~~2007 Annual Report.


	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006

Net income	$	76,521		$	74,035		$	230,248		$	206,736
Accumulated other comprehensive income (expense), net of income tax:
Unrealized gains (losses), net of reclassification adjustment for losses, net included in net income		13,853			233,060			(117,620	)		2,181
Foreign currency items		56,311			(1,502	)		129,200			31,217
Pension and postretirement benefit adjustments		(239	)		—			(552	)		—

Comprehensive income	$	146,446		$	305,593		$	241,276		$	240,134


	Three months ended
	March 31, 2008			March 31, 2007

Net income	$	31,505		$	76,252
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax:
Unrealized gains (losses), net of reclassification adjustment for gains (losses) included in net income		(145,996	)		4,643
Currency translation adjustments		(18,325	)		14,057
Unrealized pension and postretirement benefit adjustment		152			(30	)

Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(132,664	)	$	94,922


	Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated
~~By:~~	~~/s/ A. Greig Woodring November 2, 2007~~
	~~A. Greig Woodring~~
	By:	/s/ A. Greig Woodring	May 2, 2008

		A. Greig Woodring
		President & Chief Executive Officer ~~(Principal Executive Officer)~~
		(Principal Executive Officer)

	By:	/s/ Jack B. Lay ~~November~~	May 2, ~~2007~~2008
	~~Jack B. Lay~~
		Jack B. Lay
		Senior Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)


Exhibit
Number		Description
3.1		Restated Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 30, 2004.

3.2		Bylaws of RGA, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 6, 2004.

~~10.1~~		Credit Agreement, dated as of September 24, 2007, by and among Reinsurance Group of America, Incorporated and certain of its subsidiaries, the lenders named therein, Bank of America, N.A., as administrative agent, swing line lender and L/C Issuer, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as syndication agent, ABN Amro Bank, N.V., The Bank of New York, The Bank of Tokyo — Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd. New York Branch and KeyBank National Association, as co-documentation agents, and Banc of America Securities LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as co-lead arrangers and joint book managers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 24, 2007 (File No. 1-11848), filed September 27, 2007.

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


	March 31, 2008
				Fair Value Measurements Using:
	Total			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3

Assets:
Fixed maturity securities — available-for-sale:
U.S. corporate securities	$	3,313,092		$	—	$	2,487,590		$	825,502
Canadian and Canadian provincial governments		2,113,830			—		2,087,069			26,761
Residential mortgage-backed securities		1,325,631			—		1,235,210			90,421
Foreign corporate securities		1,081,715			1,895		985,762			94,058
Asset-backed securities		446,031			—		114,375			331,656
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		686,678			—		628,144			58,534
U.S. government and agencies securities		3,656			3,497		159			—
State and political subdivision securities		64,074			7,692		—			56,382
Other foreign government securities		352,387			117,128		209,407			25,852

Total fixed maturity securities — available-for-sale		9,387,094			130,212		7,747,716			1,509,166
Funds withheld at interest — embedded derivatives		(233,618	)		—		—			(233,618	)
Other invested assets — equity securities		163,721			113,748		29,771			20,202
Other invested assets — derivatives		10,243			—		10,243			—
Reinsurance ceded receivable — embedded derivatives		78,216			—		—			78,216

Total	$	9,405,656		$	243,960	$	7,787,730		$	1,373,966


Liabilities:
Interest sensitive contract liabilities — embedded derivatives	$	(585,572	)	$	—	$	—		$	(585,572	)
Other liabilities — derivatives		(301	)		—		(301	)		—

Total	$	(585,873	)	$	—	$	(301	)	$	(585,572	)


	Total Fair Value Measurements for the three months ended March 31, 2008
				Total gains/losses
				(realized/unrealized) included in:
										Purchases,
	Balance						Other			issuances			Transfers			Balance
	January 1,						comprehensive			and			in and/or			March 31,
	2008			Earnings			income			disposals			out of Level 3			2008

Assets:
Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale	$	1,500,054		$	(7,110	)	$	(36,121	)	$	71,283		$	(18,940	)	$	1,509,166
Funds withheld at interest — embedded derivatives		(85,090	)		(148,528	)		—			—			—			(233,618	)
Other invested assets — equity securities		13,950			1			(479	)		6,730			—			20,202
Reinsurance ceded receivable — embedded derivatives		68,298			6,045			—			3,873			—			78,216

Total	$	1,497,212		$	(149,592	)	$	(36,600	)	$	81,886		$	(18,940	)	$	1,373,966


Liabilities:
Interest sensitive contract liabilities — embedded derivatives	$	(531,160	)	$	(43,678	)	$	—		$	(10,734	)	$	—		$	(585,572	)

Total	$	(531,160	)	$	(43,678	)	$	—		$	(10,734	)	$	—		$	(585,572	)


	Total Gains and Losses
	Classification of gains/losses (realized/unrealized) included in earnings for the three months
	ended March 31, 2008
														Policy
														acquisition
	Investment			Investment					Claims					costs and
	income, net			related					& other					other
	of related			gains			Other		policy					insurance
	expenses			(losses), net			revenues		benefits		Interest credited			expenses		Total

Assets:
Fixed maturity securities — available-for-sale	$	(188	)	$	(6,922	)	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(7,110	)
Funds withheld at interest — embedded derivatives		—			(148,528	)		—		—		—			—		(148,528	)
Other invested assets — equity securities		1			—			—		—		—			—		1
Reinsurance ceded receivable — embedded derivatives		—			—			—		—		—			6,045		6,045

Total	$	(187	)	$	(155,450	)	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	6,045	$	(149,592	)


Liabilities:
Interest sensitive contract liabilities — embedded derivatives	$	—		$	(6,487	)	$	—	$	451	$	(37,642	)	$	—	$	(43,678	)

Total	$	—		$	(6,487	)	$	—	$	451	$	(37,642	)	$	—	$	(43,678	)


The table below summarizes changes in unrealized gains or losses recorded in earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2008 for Level 3 assets and liabilities that are still held at March 31, 2008(dollars in thousands).

	Changes in Unrealized Gains and Losses
	Changes in unrealized gains/losses relating to assets and liabilities still held at the reporting
	date for the three months ended March 31, 2008
														Policy
														acquisition
	Investment			Investment					Claims					costs
	income, net			related					& other					and other
	of related			gains			Other		policy		Interest			insurance
	expenses			(losses), net			revenues		benefits		credited			expenses		Total
Assets:
Fixed maturity securities — available-for-sale	$	(198	)	$	(1,979	)	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	(2,177	)
Funds withheld at interest — embedded derivatives		—			(148,528	)		—		—		—			—		(148,528	)
Other invested assets — equity securities		1			—			—		—		—			—		1
Reinsurance ceded receivable — embedded derivatives		—			—			—		—		—			7,811		7,811

Total	$	(197	)	$	(150,507	)	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	7,811	$	(142,893	)


Liabilities:
Interest sensitive contract liabilities — embedded derivatives	$	—		$	(6,487	)	$	—	$	71	$	(53,245	)	$	—	$	(59,661	)

Total	$	—		$	(6,487	)	$	—	$	71	$	(53,245	)	$	—	$	(59,661	)


	Three months ended					Nine months ended										Income (loss) from continuing
	September 30,					September 30,						Total revenues				operations before income taxes
	2007		2006			2007			2006			Three months ended March 31,				Three months ended March 31,
												2008		2007		2008			2007
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes

U.S.	$	66,152	$	84,802		$	245,544		$	236,073		$	711,794	$	839,081	$	15,285		$	93,177
Canada		22,798		13,462			62,034			32,967			170,953		128,794		23,671			15,034
Europe & South Africa		11,689		8,813			44,659			40,879			197,552		173,477		6,043			21,124
Asia Pacific		17,240		20,378			43,181			34,717			255,415		197,257		18,563			10,332
Corporate & Other		3,851		(9,886	)		(30,745	)		(21,433	)
Corporate and Other													24,553		16,040		(6,874	)		(20,437	)

Total	$	121,730	$	117,569		$	364,673		$	323,203		$	1,360,267	$	1,354,649	$	56,688		$	119,230


	Three months ended March 31,
	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	2008			2007			2008		2007

Determination of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	819		$	799		$	158	$	206
Interest cost		586			592			145		190
Expected rate of return on plan assets		(469	)		(455	)		—		—
Amortization of prior service cost		7			95			—		—
Amortization of prior actuarial loss		72			113			35		84

Net periodic benefit cost	$	1,015		$	1,144		$	338	$	480


				Unrecognized Tax Benefits That,
	Total Unrecognized			If Recognized Would Affect the
(dollars in millions)	Tax Benefits			Effective Tax Rate

Balance at January 1, 2007 (date of adoption)	$	196.3		$	26.4
Additions for tax positions of prior years		—			—
Reductions for tax positions of prior years		(5.8	)		(6.5	)
Additions for tax positions of current year		5.8			5.8
Reductions for tax positions of current year		—			—
Settlements with tax authorities		—			—

Balance at September 30, 2007	$	196.3		$	25.7


	March 31, 2008		December 31, 2007
Fixed maturity securities, available-for-sale	$	9,387,094	$	9,397,916
Mortgage loans on real estate		812,539		831,557
Policy loans		1,039,464		1,059,439
Funds withheld at interest		4,650,948		4,749,496
Short-term investments		46,336		75,062
Other invested assets		389,437		284,220
Cash and cash equivalents		304,083		404,351

Total cash and invested assets	$	16,629,901	$	16,802,041


	March 31,
							Increase/
	2008			2007			(Decrease)
Average invested assets at amortized cost	$	11,539,433		$	10,252,317			12.6	%
Net investment income		170,899			148,820			14.8	%

Investment yield (ratio of net investment income to average invested assets)		6.06	%		5.93	%	13		bps


			March 31, 2008							December 31, 2007
NAIC		Rating Agency	Amortized		Estimated		% of			Amortized		Estimated		% of
Designation		Designation	Cost		Fair Value		Total			Cost		Fair Value		Total
	1	AAA/AA/A	$	7,127,035	$	7,436,088		79.2	%	$	7,022,497	$	7,521,177		80.0	%
	2	BBB		1,725,432		1,676,870		17.8	%		1,628,431		1,617,983		17.2	%
	3	BB		222,209		214,105		2.3	%		201,868		198,487		2.1	%
	4	B		48,225		43,989		0.5	%		47,013		43,680		0.5	%
	5	CCC and lower		16,860		15,987		0.2	%		16,800		16,502		0.2	%
	6	In or near default		53		55		—			83		87		—

		Total	$	9,139,814	$	9,387,094		100.0	%	$	8,916,692	$	9,397,916		100.0	%


S&P Rating	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		% of Fair Value
AAA	$	117,789	$	115,212		45.3	%
AA		110,002		102,557		40.2	%
A		41,430		36,075		14.1	%
BBB		1,215		1,121		0.4	%

Total	$	270,436	$	254,965		100.0	%


	As of March 31, 2008
					Equal to or greater than
	Less than 12 months				12 months				Total
			Gross				Gross				Gross
	Estimated Fair		Unrealized		Estimated		Unrealized		Estimated Fair		Unrealized
(dollars in thousands)	Value		Loss		Fair Value		Loss		Value		Loss
Investment grade securities:
U.S. corporate securities	$	1,364,148	$	105,669	$	506,480	$	47,912	$	1,870,628	$	153,581
Canadian and Canadian provincial governments		144,448		2,924		25,089		1,258		169,537		4,182
Residential mortgage-backed securities		389,755		16,616		167,342		10,276		557,097		26,892
Foreign corporate securities		396,425		34,494		171,394		11,633		567,819		46,127
Asset-backed securities		271,240		37,976		93,824		12,040		365,064		50,016
Commercial mortgage-backed securities		473,862		40,214		44,599		3,111		518,461		43,325
State and political subdivisions		25,820		2,035		11,554		3,302		37,374		5,337
Other foreign government securities		95,418		1,321		57,301		1,765		152,719		3,086

Investment grade securities	$	3,161,116		241,249		1,077,583		91,297		4,238,699		332,546


Non-investment grade securities:
U.S. corporate securities		131,232		12,660		34,045		2,228		165,277		14,888
Asset-backed securities		1,330		2		—		—		1,330		2
Foreign corporate securities		10,051		1,885		3,420		237		13,471		2,122

Non-investment grade securities		142,613		14,547		37,465		2,465		180,078		17,012

Total fixed maturity securities	$	3,303,729	$	255,796	$	1,115,048	$	93,762	$	4,418,777	$	349,558

Equity securities	$	124,771	$	20,286	$	7,061	$	1,457	$	131,832	$	21,743

Total number of securities in an unrealized loss position		912				378				1,290


(1)		In February 2008 the Company net settled – issuing 217,375 shares from treasury and repurchasing from recipients 56,129 shares in settlement of income tax withholding requirements incurred by the recipients of an equity incentive award.

Large accelerated filerþ

Accelerated filero~~Non-accelerated filer~~o

Non-accelerated filero

Smaller reporting companyo

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)