UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

   
(Mark One)
 [x]QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period endedJanuary 31,April 30, 2003

OR

   
 [  ]TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from           to

Commission file Number1-8929

ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED


(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Delaware
94-1369354

(State or other jurisdiction of94-1369354

(IRS Employer
incorporation or organization) (IRS Employer
Identification No.)

160 Pacific Avenue, Suite 222, San Francisco, California 94111


160 Pacific Avenue, Suite 222, San Francisco, California94111

(Address of principal executive offices)    (Zip(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:415/733-4000

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:415/733-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [x] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes [  ] No [x]

Number of shares of common stock outstanding as of February 28,May 31, 2003: 48,939,828.49,218,144.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Stockholders
Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURES
CERTIFICATIONS
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit 10.784.1
Exhibit 99.1
Exhibit 99.2


ABM Industries Incorporated


Form 10-Q
For the three months and six months ended January 31,April 30, 2003

Table of Contents

     
    Page
    
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION  
Item 1 Financial Statements (Unaudited) 2
  Notes to Financial Statements 7
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 1214
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 2332
Item 4 Controls and Procedures 2332
PART II 
OTHER INFORMATION
  
Item 4 Submission of Matters to a Vote of Stockholders33
Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 2433
Signatures   34
25Certifications 35

1


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)

ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except share amounts)

                
 January 31, October 31, April 30, October 31,
 2003 2002 2003 2002
 
 
 
 
ASSETS
ASSETS
 
ASSETS
 
Current assets
Current assets
 
Current assets
 
Cash and cash equivalents $11,152 $19,427 Cash and cash equivalents $10,515 $19,427 
Trade accounts receivable, net 319,225 318,376 Trade accounts receivable, net 326,167 318,376 
Inventories 29,465 30,055 Inventories 29,437 30,055 
Deferred income taxes 29,460 30,002 Deferred income taxes 30,467 30,002 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 42,785 39,925 Prepaid expenses and other current assets 44,434 39,925 
 
 
   
 
 
 Total current assets 432,087 437,785  Total current assets 441,020 437,785 
 
 
   
 
 
Investments and long-term receivables
Investments and long-term receivables
 14,394 14,952 
Investments and long-term receivables
 13,809 14,952 
Property, plant and equipment, at cost
Property, plant and equipment, at cost
 
Property, plant and equipment, at cost
 
Land and buildings 5,118 5,114 Land and buildings 5,055 5,114 
Transportation equipment 14,296 14,245 Transportation equipment 15,099 14,245 
Machinery and other equipment 75,400 73,001 Machinery and other equipment 74,325 73,001 
Leasehold improvements 14,640 14,428 Leasehold improvements 13,911 14,428 
 
 
   
 
 
 109,454 106,788   108,390 106,788 
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  (72,959)  (70,522)Less accumulated depreciation and amortization  (73,046)  (70,522)
 
 
   
 
 
 Property, plant and equipment, net 36,495 36,266  Property, plant and equipment, net 35,344 36,266 
 
 
   
 
 
Goodwill
Goodwill
 181,216 167,916 
Goodwill
 185,540 167,916 
Deferred income taxes
Deferred income taxes
 34,860 33,542 
Deferred income taxes
 35,432 33,542 
Other assets
Other assets
 18,421 14,478 
Other assets
 18,745 14,478 
 
 
   
 
 
Total assetsTotal assets $717,473 $704,939 Total assets $729,890 $704,939 
 
 
   
 
 

(Continued)

2


ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands except share amounts)

                
 January 31, October 31, April 30, October 31,
 2003 2002 2003 2002
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
Current liabilities
Current liabilities
 
Current liabilities
 
Trade accounts payable $48,725 $51,585 Trade accounts payable $42,567 $51,585 
Income taxes payable 8,947 6,579 Income taxes payable 7,847 6,579 
Accrued liabilities   Accrued liabilities: 
 Compensation 58,977 62,412  Compensation 69,070 62,412 
 Taxes – other than income 17,997 13,923  Taxes - other than income 16,501 13,923 
 Insurance claims 51,105 50,969  Insurance claims 52,949 50,969 
 Other 57,018 41,622  Other 57,862 41,622 
 
 
   
 
 
 Total current liabilities 242,769 227,090  Total current liabilities 246,796 227,090 
Retirement plans
Retirement plans
 23,670 23,791 
Retirement plans
 24,003 23,791 
Insurance claims
Insurance claims
 69,021 67,388 
Insurance claims
 68,623 67,388 
 
 
   
 
 
 Total liabilities 335,460 318,269  Total liabilities 339,422 318,269 
 
 
   
 
 
Stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity
 
Stockholders’ equity
 
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 500,000 shares authorized; none issued   Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 500,000 shares authorized; none issued   
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 50,840,000 and 50,397,000 shares issued at January 31, 2003 and October 31, 2002, respectively 508 504 Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized; 51,145,000 and 50,397,000 shares issued at April 30, 2003 and October 31, 2002, respectively 512 504 
Additional paid-in capital 156,073 151,135 Additional paid-in capital 159,233 151,135 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (789)  (789)Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (720)  (789)
Retained earnings 259,150 259,452 Retained earnings 264,372 259,452 
Cost of treasury stock (2,000,000 and 1,400,000 shares at January 31, 2003 and October 31, 2002, respectively)  (32,929)  (23,632)Cost of treasury stock (2,000,000 and 1,400,000 shares at April 30, 2003 and October 31, 2002, respectively)  (32,929)  (23,632)
 
 
   
 
 
 Total stockholders’ equity 382,013 386,670  Total stockholders’ equity 390,468 386,670 
 
 
   
 
 
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equityTotal liabilities and stockholders’ equity $717,473 $704,939 Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $729,890 $704,939 
 
 
   
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

3


ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31, 2003 AND 2002

(In thousands except per share amounts)

                  
 Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
          April 30, April 30,
 2003 2002 2003 2002 2003 2002
 
 
 
 
 
 
Revenues
Revenues
 
Revenues
 
Sales and other income $580,626 $527,552  Sales and other income $589,829 $525,850 $1,170,455 $1,053,402 
Expenses
 �� 
 Gain on insurance claim  4,300  4,300 
   
 
 
 
 
 Total revenues 589,829 530,150 1,170,455 1,057,702 
   
 
 
 
 
Expenses
 
Operating expenses and cost of goods sold 526,383 474,783  Operating expenses and cost of goods sold 526,613 468,563 1,052,996 943,346 
Selling, general and administrative 47,606 39,616  Selling, general and administrative 47,460 38,791 95,066 78,407 
Interest 125 265  Interest 178 232 303 497 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
 Total expenses 574,114 514,664  Total expenses 574,251 507,586 1,148,365 1,022,250 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
Income before income taxesIncome before income taxes 6,512 12,888 Income before income taxes 15,578 22,564 22,090 35,452 
Income taxesIncome taxes 2,174 4,897 Income taxes 5,686 8,575 7,860 13,472 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
Net income
Net income
 $4,338 $7,991 
Net income
 $9,892 $13,989 $14,230 $21,980 
 
 
    
 
 
 
 
Net income per common share
Net income per common share
 
Net income per common share
 
Basic $0.09 $0.16  Basic $0.20 $0.28 $0.29 $0.45 
Diluted $0.09 $0.16  Diluted $0.20 $0.27 $0.29 $0.43 
Average common and common equivalent shares
Average common and common equivalent shares
 
Average common and common equivalent shares
 
Basic 49,053 48,966  Basic 48,994 49,256 49,023 49,110 
Diluted 49,972 50,678  Diluted 49,877 51,494 49,925 51,086 
Dividends paid per common share
 $0.095 $0.090 
Dividends per common share
Dividends per common share
 $0.095 $0.090 $0.190 $0.180 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

4


ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREESIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31,APRIL 30, 2003 AND 2002

(In thousands)

                
 2003 2002 2003 2002
 
 
 
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
Cash flows from operating activities:
 
Cash received from customers $577,066 $541,251 Cash received from customers $1,157,025 $1,071,987 
Other operating cash receipts 819 1,044 Other operating cash receipts 1,702 7,353 
Interest received 360 176 Interest received 521 303 
Cash paid to suppliers and employees  (560,193)  (529,559)Cash paid to suppliers and employees  (1,127,297)  (1,025,220)
Interest paid  (39)  (296)Interest paid  (193)  (614)
Income taxes paid  (199)  (155)Income taxes paid  (8,515)  (13,498)
 
 
   
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities 17,814 12,461 Net cash provided by operating activities 23,243 40,311 
 
 
   
 
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
Cash flows from investing activities:
 
Additions to property, plant and equipment  (2,670)  (2,181)Additions to property, plant and equipment  (5,572)  (3,880)
Proceeds from sale of assets 211 346 Proceeds from sale of assets 400 603 
Decrease (increase) in investments and long-term receivables 558  (515)Decrease in investments and long-term receivables 1,143 156 
Purchase of businesses  (14,810)  (3,226)Purchase of businesses  (17,193)  (11,577)
 
 
   
 
 
Net cash used in investing activities  (16,711)  (5,576)Net cash used in investing activities  (21,222)  (14,698)
 
 
   
 
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
Cash flows from financing activities:
 
Common stock issued 4,559 3,987 Common stock issued 7,674 9,740 
Common stock purchases  (9,297)  Common stock purchases  (9,297)  (16,670)
Dividends paid  (4,640)  (4,415)Dividends paid  (9,310)  (8,878)
Increase in bank overdraft  8,986 Increase in bank overdraft  1,687 
Repayments of long-term borrowings   (10,877)Repayments of long-term borrowings   (11,819)
 
 
   
 
 
Net cash used in financing activities  (9,378)  (2,319)Net cash used in financing activities  (10,933)  (25,940)
 
 
   
 
 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents  (8,275) 4,566 
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalentsNet decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (8,912)  (327)
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of periodCash and cash equivalents beginning of period 19,427 3,052 Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period 19,427 3,052 
 
 
   
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
 $11,152 $7,618 
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
 $10,515 $2,725 
 
 
   
 
 

(Continued)

5


ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE THREESIX MONTHS ENDED JANUARY 31,APRIL 30, 2003 AND 2002

(In thousands)

                 
 2003 2002 2003 2002
 
 
 
 
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
Reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
Net incomeNet income $4,338 $7,991 Net income $14,230 $21,980 
Adjustments:Adjustments: Adjustments: 
Depreciation and intangible amortization 3,620 3,834 Depreciation and intangible amortization 7,440 7,642 
Provision for bad debts 1,534 551 Provision for bad debts 3,369 2,123 
Gain on sale of assets  (28)  (68)Gain on sale of assets  (81)  (157)
(Increase) decrease in deferred income taxes  (776) 223 (Increase) decrease in deferred income taxes  (2,355) 531 
(Increase) decrease in trade accounts receivable  (2,353) 14,985 (Increase) decrease in trade accounts receivable  (11,126) 22,098 
Decrease (increase) in inventories 590  (1,603)Decrease (increase) in inventories 633  (3,528)
Increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets  (2,161)  (1,549)(Increase) decrease in prepaid expenses and other current assets  (3,744) 1,900 
(Increase) decrease in other assets  (4,005) 534 (Increase) decrease in other assets  (4,626) 126 
Increase in income taxes payable 2,751 4,520 Increase in income taxes payable 1,700  (557)
(Decrease) increase in retirement plans accrual  (121) 329 Increase in retirement plan accrual 212 413 
Increase in insurance claims liability 1,769 1,552 Increase in insurance claims liability 3,215 2,199 
Increase (decrease) in trade accounts payable and other accrued liabilities 12,656  (18,838)Increase (decrease) in trade accounts payable and other accrued liabilities 14,376  (14,459)
 
 
   
 
 
Total adjustments to net incomeTotal adjustments to net income 13,476 4,470 Total adjustments to net income 9,013 18,331 
 
 
   
 
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities
 $17,814 $12,461 
Net cash provided by operating activities
 $23,243 $40,311 
 
 
   
 
 
Supplemental data:
Supplemental data:
 
Supplemental data:
 
Non-cash investing activities:Non-cash investing activities: Non-cash investing activities: 
Common stock issued for net assets of business acquired $ $1,371 Common stock issued for net assets of business acquired $ $1,371 
 
 
   
 
 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.

6


ABM INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. General

     In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all material adjustments which are necessary to present fairly ABM Industries Incorporated and subsidiaries (the Company) financial position as of January 31,April 30, 2003, and the results of operations for the three and six months then ended, and cash flows for the threesix months then ended. These adjustments are of a normal, recurring nature.

     These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2002, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

2. Net Income per Common Share

     The Company has reported its earnings in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” Basic net income per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, including common stock equivalents. The calculation of net income per common share is as follows:

                 
  Three months ended Six months ended
(In thousands except April 30, April 30,
per share amounts) 2003 2002 2003 2002
  
 
 
 
Net income available to common stockholders $9,892  $13,989  $14,230  $21,980 
   
   
   
   
 
Average common shares outstanding - - basic  48,994   49,256   49,023   49,110 
Effect of dilutive securities:                
Stock options  883   2,238   902   1,976 
   
   
   
   
 
Average common shares outstanding - - diluted  49,877   51,494   49,925   51,086 
   
   
   
   
 
Net income per common share - basic $0.20  $0.28  $0.29  $0.45 
Net income per common share - diluted $0.20  $0.27  $0.29  $0.43 

     For purposes of computing diluted net income per common share, weighted average common share equivalents do not include stock

7


options with an exercise price that exceeds the average fair market value of the Company’s common stock for the period (i.e., “out-of-the-money” options). On April 30, 2003 and 2002, options to purchase common shares of 4.3 million and 0.4 million at a weighted average exercise price of $15.85 and $18.36, respectively, were excluded from the computation.

3.Stock-Based Compensation – Adoption of Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsStandard No. 148

     In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure.” SFAS No. 148 amends SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” to provide for alternative methods of transition to SFAS No. 123 and amends disclosure provisions. The Statement is effective for financial statements for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The Company continues to account for stock-based employee compensation plans using the intrinsic value method under the recognition and measurement principles of Accounting Principles Board (APB) Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees” but, and has adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS 148 effective November 1, 2002. The Company’s application of APB Opinion No. 25 generally does not result in compensation cost because the exercise price of the options is equal to the fair value of the stock at the grant date. Under the intrinsic value method, if the fair value of the stock is greater than the exercise price at grant date, the excess is amortized to compensation expense over the estimated service life of the recipient. No stock-based employee compensation cost is reflected in net income for the quartersthree and six months ended January 31,April 30, 2003 and 2002 as all options granted since October 31, 1995 had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. The following table illustrates the effect on net income and earnings per share if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to all employee options granted, modified, or settled after October 31, 1995 using the retroactive restatement method:

78


the retroactive restatement method (in thousands except per share amounts):

          
   Three months
   ended January 31,
   2003 2002
   
 
Net income, as reported $4,338  $7,991 
Add :Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax effects, included in net income      
Deduct :Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax effects, that would have been included in net income if the fair value method had been applied  1,079   1,022 
   
   
 
Net income, pro forma $3,259  $6,969 
   
   
 
Net income per common share - basic, as reported $0.09  $0.16 
Net income per common share - basic, pro forma $0.07  $0.14 
Net income per common share - diluted, as reported $0.09  $0.16 
Net income per common share - diluted, pro forma $0.07  $0.14 
                  
   Three months ended Six months ended
(In thousands except April 30, April 30,
per share amounts) 2003 2002 2003 2002
  
 
 
 
Net income, as reported $9,892  $13,989  $14,230  $21,980 
Add:Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax effect, included in net income           
Deduct:Stock-based employee compensation cost, net of tax effect, that would have been included in net income if the fair value method had been applied 1,054   1,052   2,133   2,074 
   
   
   
   
 
Net income, pro forma $8,838  $12,937  $12,097  $19,906 
   
   
   
   
 
Net income per common share - basic,                
 as reported $0.20  $0.28  $0.29  $0.45 
 pro forma $0.18  $0.26  $0.25  $0.41 
Net income per common share - diluted,                
 as reported $0.20  $0.27  $0.29  $0.43 
 pro forma $0.18  $0.25  $0.24  $0.39 

3.Treasury Stock

     On September 16, 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding stock at any time through December 31, 2001. On December 17, 2001, the Board of Directors extended this authorization until December 31, 2002. On December 10, 2002, the Board of Directors extended this authorization through January 31, 2003. As of October 31, 2002, the Company had purchased 1,400,000 shares at a cost of $23,632,000 (an average price per share of $16.88). In the three months ended January 31, 2003, the Company purchased the remaining 600,000 shares at a cost of $9,297,000 (an average price per share of $15.50).

     On March 11, 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors further authorized the purchase of up to 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s outstanding stock at any time through December 31, 2003.

4. Revenue Presentation - Adoption of Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 01-14

     In January 2002, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) released Issue No. 01-14, “Income Statement Characterization of Reimbursements Received for Out-of-Pocket Expenses Incurred,” which the Company adopted in fiscal 2002. For the Company’s Parking segment this pronouncement requires both revenues and expenses be recognized, in equal amounts, for costs directly reimbursed from its managed parking lot clients. Previously, expenses directly

8


reimbursed under managed parking lot agreements were netted against the reimbursement received. EITF No. 01-14 did not change the income statement presentation of revenues and expenses of any other segments. Amounts have been reclassified to conform to the presentation of these reimbursed expenses in all prior periods presented. Adoption of the pronouncement resulted in an increase in total revenues and total costs and expenses in equal amounts of $53,705,000$51.5 million and $51,576,000$49.0 million for the three months ended January 31,April 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, and $105.2 million and $100.6 million for the six months ended April 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This presentation change had no impact on operating profits or net income.

5.Goodwill and Other Intangibles
9


5. Goodwill and Other Intangibles

     The changes in the carrying amount of goodwill (in thousands) for the threesix months ended January 31,April 30, 2003 are as follows (acquisitions are discussed in Note 9)6):

(In thousands)

                              
 Balance as of Balance as of Balance as of Balance as of
 October 31, Earnout January 31, October 31, April 30,
Segment 2002 Acquisitions Payments 2003 2002 Acquisitions Earnouts 2003

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Janitorial $108,698 $12,650 $425 $121,773  $108,698 $12,965 $2,539 $124,202 
Parking 27,271  163 27,434  27,271 1,627 431 29,329 
Engineering 2,174   2,174  2,174   2,174 
Security 7,213  45 7,258  7,213  45 7,258 
Lighting 16,701  17 16,718  16,701  17 16,718 
Elevator 3,907   3,907  3,907   3,907 
Other 1,952   1,952  1,952   1,952 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 $167,916 $12,650 $650 $181,216  $167,916 $14,592 $3,032 $185,540 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 

     As of January 31,April 30, 2003 and October 31, 2002, all intangible assets other than goodwill, consisting principally of contract rights with a net book value of $4,030,000$4.2 million and $4,059,000,$4.1 million, respectively, were included in other assets and are being amortized over the contract periods. Amortization expense for intangible assets other than goodwill was $262,000$0.3 million for each of the three month periods ended April 30, 2003 and $263,0002002, and $0.6 million and $0.5 million for the threesix months ended January 31,April 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively. The remaining amortization period for intangible assets other than goodwill ranges from 11 months1 to 14 years. The weighted average remaining life is 8 years.

6.Net Income per Common Share

     The Company has reported its earnings in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share.” Basic net income per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period, including common stock equivalents. The calculation of net income per common share is as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):

9


          
   Three months
   ended January 31,
   2003 2002
   
 
Net income available to common stockholders $4,338  $7,991 
   
   
 
Average common shares outstanding - basic  49,053   48,966 
Effect of dilutive securities:        
 Stock options  919   1,712 
   
   
 
Average common shares outstanding - diluted  49,972   50,678 
   
   
 
Net income per common share - basic $0.09  $0.16 
Net income per common share - diluted $0.09  $0.16 

     For purposes of computing diluted net income per common share, weighted average common share equivalents do not include stock options with an exercise price that exceeds the average fair market value of the Company’s common stock for the period (i.e., “out-of-the-money” options). On January 31, 2003 and 2002, options to purchase common shares of 3,061,000 and 2,223,0005 years at a weighted average exercise price of $16.29 and $16.09, respectively, were excluded from the computation.

7.Debt

     The Company has a $150,000,000 syndicated line of credit which will expire July 1, 2005. Under the terms of this unsecured revolving credit facility, no compensating balances are required and the interest rate is determined at the time of borrowing based on the London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) plus a spread of .875% to 1.25% or, for overnight borrowings, at the prime rate plus a spread of .00% to .25%. The spread for LIBOR and prime borrowings is based on the Company’s leverage ratio. The facility calls for a commitment fee payable quarterly, in arrears, of .175% based on the average, daily, unused portion. For purposes of this calculation, irrevocable standby letters of credit issued in conjunction with the Company’s self-insurance program and parking business plus cash borrowings are considered to be outstanding amounts. As of January 31, 2003, the total outstanding amount under this facility was $120,507,000 in the form of standby letters of credit. The provisions of the credit facility require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and limit outside borrowings. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of January 31,April 30, 2003.

8.Comprehensive Income (Loss)

     Comprehensive income consists of net income and other related gains and losses affecting stockholders’ equity that, under generally accepted accounting principles, are excluded from net

10


income. For the Company, such other comprehensive income items consist of unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses. Comprehensive income for the three months ended January 31, 2003 and 2002 approximated net income.

9.6. Acquisitions

     All acquisitions have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting. Operations of the companies and businesses acquired have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from their respective dates of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over fair value of the net assets acquired is generally included in goodwill. Most purchase agreements provide for contingent payments based on the annual pretax income for subsequent periods ranging generally from two to five years. Any such future payments are generally capitalized as goodwill when paid. Cash paid for acquisitions, including down payments and contingent amounts based on subsequent earnings, was $14,810,000$17.2 million and $3,226,000$11.6 million in the threesix months ended January 31, April 30,

10


2003 and 2002, respectively. In addition, shares of common stock with a fair market value of $1,371,000$1.4 million at the date of issuance were issued in the first quartersix months of 2002, which was the final payment under the contingent payment provisions of a 1997 acquisition.

     On January 31, 2003, the Company acquired the commercial self-performingself-performed janitorial cleaning operations of Horizon National Commercial Services, LLC, a provider of janitorial services based in Red Bank, New Jersey. Assets acquired by the Company include key customer accounts in the eastern, mid-western and south central United States. The total adjusted acquisition cost was $14,679,000,$14.7 million, which included the assumption of payroll related liabilities totaling $269,000.$0.2 million. Of the total adjusted acquisition cost, $12,650,000$13.0 million was allocated to goodwill and $2,029,000$1.7 million to fixed and other assets.assets at the time of acquisition.

     On April 30, 2003, the Company acquired selected assets of Valet Parking Service, a provider of parking services based in Culver City, California. The purchase price allocation is subjecttotal acquisition cost included a cash down payment of $1.6 million, most of which was allocated to change within ninety daysgoodwill, plus annual contingent payments of $0.3 million for the three years subsequent to the acquisition date, if specified levels of variable gross profits from the closing date.acquired operations are maintained.

     The operating results generated from this acquisitionthese acquisitions will be included in the consolidated financial results of the Company effective February 1, 2003.from the respective dates of acquisition. Due to the relative size of this acquisition,these acquisitions, pro forma information is not included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

     During the threesix months ended January 31,April 30, 2003, contingent payments totaling $650,000$3.0 million were made on earlier acquisitions as provided by the respective purchase agreements. All amounts paid were added to goodwill.

117. Debt


10.Segment Information

     Under SFAS No. 131 criteria,     In April 2003, the Company has six reportable segments: Janitorial, Parking, Engineering, Security, Lighting, and Elevator. All other services are included inincreased the “Other” segment. Corporate expenses are not allocated.

          
   Three months ended January 31,
   2003 2002
   
 
   (In thousands)
Sales and Other Income:
        
 Janitorial $330,852  $286,800 
 Parking  94,415   89,486 
 Engineering  45,627   43,670 
 Security  37,789   32,163 
 Lighting  33,146   32,567 
 Elevator  28,182   26,493 
 Other  10,484   16,156 
 Corporate  131   217 
   
   
 
  $580,626  $527,552 
   
   
 
Operating Profit:
        
 Janitorial $7,807  $10,843 
 Parking  590   1,048 
 Engineering  2,030   2,321 
 Security  1,342   1,195 
 Lighting  680   1,909 
 Elevator  951   916 
 Other  (123)  698 
 Corporate Expenses  (6,640)  (5,777)
   
   
 
 
Operating Profit
 6,637   13,153 
 Interest Expense  (125)  (265)
   
   
 
 Income Before Income Taxes $6,512  $12,888 
   
   
 

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Financial Condition

     Funds provided from operations and bank borrowings have historically been the sources for meeting working capital requirements, financing capital expenditures and acquisitions, and paying cash dividends. Management believes that funds from these sources will remain available and adequately serve the Company’s liquidity needs. The Company has a $150 millionamount of its syndicated line of credit, which will expire July 1, 2005. Under the terms of this unsecured revolving credit facility,2005, to $250 million. As amended, no compensating balances are required under the facility and the interest rate is determined at the time of borrowing based on the London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) plus a

12


spread of .875% to 1.25%1.50% or, for overnight borrowings, at the prime rate plus a spread of .00% to .25% or, for overnight to one week, at the interbank offered rate (IBOR) plus a spread of .875% to 1.50%. The spread for LIBOR, PRIME and primeIBOR borrowings is based on the Company’s leverage ratio. The facility calls for a commitment fee payable quarterly, in arrears, of .200%, as amended, based on

11


the average, daily, unused portion. For purposes of this calculation, irrevocable standby letters of credit issued primarily in conjunction with the Company’s self-insurance program plus cash borrowings are considered to be outstanding amounts. As of January 31,April 30, 2003, the total outstanding amount outstanding under this facility was $120.5 million in the form of standby letters of credit. The provisions of the credit facility require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and limit outside borrowings. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of January 31,April 30, 2003.

     During8. Comprehensive Income (Loss)

     Comprehensive income consists of net income and other related gains and losses affecting stockholders’ equity that, under generally accepted accounting principles, are excluded from net income. For the Company, such other comprehensive income items consist of unrealized foreign currency translation gains and losses. Comprehensive income for the three and six months ended January 31,April 30, 2003 and 2002 operating activities generatedapproximated net cash of $17.8 million and $12.5 million, respectively. Operating cash flows increased primarily due to higher revenues and greater collections in the first quarter of 2003, compared to the first quarter of 2002. Additionally, accrued liabilities were higher as of January 31, 2003 compared to October 31, 2002 mainly due to the timing of recurring expense payments.income.

     Net cash used in investing activities was $16.7 million in the three months ended January 31, 2003, compared to $5.6 million in the same period of 2002. The increase is primarily due to the acquisition of the commercial self-performing janitorial cleaning operations from Horizon National Commercial Services in January 2003.

     Net cash used in financing activities was $9.4 million in the three months ended January 31, 2003, compared to $2.3 million in the three months ended January 31, 2002. The change is principally due to the purchase of 0.6 million shares of the Company’s stock as discussed below.9. Treasury Stock

     On September 16, 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 2.0 million shares of the Company’s outstanding stock at any time through December 31, 2001. On December 17, 2001, the Board of Directors extended this authorization untilthrough December 31, 2002. On2002 and on December 10, 2002, the Board of Directors extended this authorization was extended through January 31, 2003. As of October 31, 2002, the Company had purchased 1.4 million shares at a cost of $23.6 million (an average price per share of $16.88). In the three months ended January 31, 2003, the Company purchased the remaining 0.6 million shares at a cost of $9.3 million (an average price per share of $15.50).

     On March 11, 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors further authorized the purchase of up to 2.0 million shares of the Company’s outstanding stock at any time through December 31, 2003. The Company did not purchase any shares in the three months ended April 30, 2003.

10. Segment Information

     Under SFAS No. 131 criteria, Janitorial, Parking, Engineering, Security, Lighting, and Elevator are reportable segments. All other services are included in the “Other” segment. Corporate expenses are not allocated.

12


                   
    Three months ended Six months ended
    April 30, April 30,
(In thousands) 2003 2002 2003 2002

 
 
 
 
Sales and Other Income:
                
 Janitorial $343,505  $284,229  $674,357  $571,029 
 Parking  91,659   88,353   186,074   177,839 
 Engineering  43,945   42,667   89,572   86,337 
 Security  39,008   34,631   76,797   66,794 
 Lighting  33,577   32,071   66,723   64,638 
 Elevator  27,292   28,234   55,474   54,727 
 Other  10,741   15,532   21,225   31,688 
 Corporate  102   133   233   350 
    
   
   
   
 
  $589,829  $525,850  $1,170,455  $1,053,402 
    
   
   
   
 
Operating Profit:
                
 Janitorial $15,570  $16,327  $23,377  $27,170 
 Parking  1,022   1,783   1,612   2,831 
 Engineering  2,586   2,339   4,616   4,660 
 Security  1,160   1,065   2,502   2,260 
 Lighting  1,813   2,095   2,493   4,004 
 Elevator  1,043   608   1,994   1,524 
 Other  70   74   (53)  772 
 Corporate expense  (7,508)  (5,795)  (14,148)  (11,572)
    
   
   
   
 
  
Operating Profit
  15,756   18,496   22,393   31,649 
 Gain on insurance claim     4,300      4,300 
 Interest expense  (178)  (232)  (303)  (497)
    
   
   
   
 
 Income before income taxes $15,578  $22,564  $22,090  $35,452 
    
   
   
   
 

11. Contingencies

     In September 1999, a former employee filed a gender discrimination lawsuit against the Company. On May 19, 2003, a Washington state court jury awarded $4 million in damages, plus plaintiff’s costs, to the former employee. The Company will ask the Superior Court, State of Washington, County of Spokane, to set aside the jury verdict and will appeal if the court denies that request. Although there can be no assurance that the Company will prevail in this matter, the Company believes that the verdict against the Company was inconsistent with the law and facts of the case and that it will be reversed upon appeal. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any liability in its financial statements associated with the jury award.

13


Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Financial Condition

     Funds provided from operations and bank borrowings have historically been the sources for meeting working capital requirements, financing capital expenditures and acquisitions, and paying cash dividends. Management believes that funds from these sources will remain available and adequately serve the Company’s liquidity needs. In April 2003, the Company increased the amount of its syndicated line of credit, which will expire July 1, 2005, to $250 million. As amended, no compensating balances are required under the facility and the interest rate is determined at the time of borrowing based on the London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) plus a spread of .875% to 1.50% or, for overnight borrowings, at the prime rate plus a spread of .00% to .25% or, for overnight to one week, at the interbank offered rate (IBOR) plus a spread of      .875% to 1.50%. The spread for LIBOR, PRIME and IBOR borrowings is based on the Company’s leverage ratio. The facility calls for a commitment fee payable quarterly, in arrears, of .200%, as amended, based on the average, daily, unused portion. For purposes of this calculation, irrevocable standby letters of credit issued primarily in conjunction with the Company’s self-insurance program plus cash borrowings are considered to be outstanding amounts. As of April 30, 2003, the total outstanding amount under this facility was $120.5 million in the form of standby letters of credit. The provisions of the credit facility require the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and limit outside borrowings. The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of April 30, 2003.

     During the six months ended April 30, 2003 and 2002, operating activities generated net cash of $23.2 million and $40.3 million, respectively. Cash from operations for the six months ended April 30, 2002 included the receipt of the initial payment of $6.5 million from the September 11th insurance claim. Cash from operations decreased primarily due to greater collection of outstanding accounts receivable balances during the first half of 2002 compared to the first half of 2003, higher insurance premium payments, and effect of the timing of other recurring expense payments.

     Net cash used in investing activities was $21.2 million in the six months ended April 30, 2003, compared to $14.7 million in the same period of 2002. The increase is primarily due to the acquisition of the commercial self-performed janitorial cleaning operations from Horizon National Commercial Services in January 2003.

14


     Net cash used in financing activities was $10.9 million in the six months ended April 30, 2003, compared to $25.9 million in the six months ended April 30, 2002. The change is principally due to the net effect of no long-term borrowings and repayments in the first six months of 2003, compared to $11.8 million of repayments of long-term borrowings in the first six months of 2002, and the use of $9.3 million to purchase the Company’s stock in the first half of 2003, compared to $16.7 million in the first half of the prior year.

     On September 16, 2001, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 2.0 million shares of the Company’s outstanding stock at any time through December 31, 2001. On December 17, 2001, the Board of Directors extended this authorization through December 31, 2002 and on December 10, 2002, this authorization was extended through January 31, 2003. As of October 31, 2002, the Company had purchased 1.4 million shares at a cost of $23.6 million (an average price per share of $16.88). In the three months ended January 31, 2003, the Company purchased the remaining 0.6 million shares at a cost of $9.3 million (an average price per share of $15.50).

     On March 11, 2003, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the purchase of up to 2.0 million shares of the Company’s outstanding stock at any time through December 31, 2003. The Company did not purchase any shares in the three months ended April 30, 2003.

     At January 31,April 30, 2003, working capital was $189.3$194.2 million, compared to $210.7 million at October 31, 2002. The $21.4$16.5 million decline is primarily due to higher accrued liabilities as of January 31,April 30, 2003 compared to October 31, 2002 mainly due to the timing of recurring expense payments. The largest component of working capital consists of trade accounts receivable that totaled $319.2$326.2 million at January 31,April 30, 2003, compared to $318.4 million at October 31, 2002. These amounts were net of allowances for doubtful

13


accounts of $6.2$6.4 million and $6.6 million at January 31,April 30, 2003 and October 31, 2002, respectively. As of January 31,April 30, 2003, accounts receivable that were over 90 days past due had decreased slightly$6.7 million to $41.4$34.9 million (13.0%(10.7% of the total net outstanding) from $41.6 million (13.1% of the total net outstanding) at October 31, 2002, primarily due to continued increased collection efforts.

     The Company self-insures certain insurable risks such as general liability, automobile property damage, and workers’ compensation. Commercial umbrella policies are obtained to provide for $150 million of coverage above the self-insured retention limits (i.e., deductible). As of November 1, 2002, substantially all of the self-insured retentions increased from $0.5 million to $1.0

15


$1.0 million. Effective April 14, 2003, the deductible for California workers’ compensation insurance increased to $2.0 million per occurrence due to general insurance market conditions. This recent increase in retention will be taken into consideration during this year’s actuarial review of the reserves. While the increased self-insured retention increases the Company’s risk associated with workers’ compensation liabilities, during the entire history of the Company’s self-insurance program, few claims have exceeded $1.0 million. Despite the increased retention, the price of the 2003 umbrella policies is significantly higher than 2002 and this higher price has been factored into the self-insurance rates charged by the Company to its divisions in 2003. The Company annually retains an outside actuary to review the adequacy of its self-insurance claim reserves.

Insurance Claims Related to the Destruction of the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11, 2001

     The Company had commercial insurance policies covering business interruption, property damage and other losses related to this tragic incident. As previously reported by the Company, the World Trade Center complex in New York was the Company’s largest single job-site with annual sales of approximately $75 million (3% of ABM’s consolidated sales for 2001). The Company has been working withprovided its insurance carrier, Zurich Insurance, in providing claim information regarding the lost business income and, as described further below, has substantially settled the property portion of the claim. In December 2001, Zurich filed a Declaratory Judgment Action in the Southern District of New York claiming the loss of the business profit falls under the policy’s Contingent Business Interruption Sub-limitcontingent business interruption sub-limit of $10 million. On June 2, 2003, the court ruled in favor of Zurich. Based on a review of the policy and consultation with legal counsel and other specialists, the Company believescontinues to believe that its business interruption claim does not fall under the $10 million sub-limit on contingent business interruption.interruption and, therefore, the Company will appeal the judge’s decision. Zurich’s filing does not impact any other aspects of the claim. As of October 31, 2002, Zurich paid two partial settlements totaling $13.3 million, of which $10 million is for business interruption and $3.3 million for property damage. The Company realized a pretax gain of $10 million in 2002 on the proceeds received. There have been no additional settlements or legal developments in the three months ended January 31, 2003.

     Under the guidance published by the Emerging Issues Task Force of the Financial Accounting Standards Board “Accounting for the

14


Impact of the Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001,” the Company has not recognized future amounts it expects to recover from its business interruption insurance as income. Any gain from insurance proceeds is considered a contingent gain and, under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” can only be recognized as income in the period when any and all contingencies for that portion of the insurance claim have been resolved.

Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

     The Company is contractually obligated to make future payments under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. As of January 31,April 30, 2003, future contractual payments are as follows:

16


(In thousands)

                                    
(In thousands) Payments Due By Period
 Payments Due By Period

 
 
Contractual Less than 1 - 3 4 - 5 After 5 Less than 1 - 2 4 - 5 After 5
Obligations Total 1 year years years years Total 1 year years years years

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Operating Leases  $190,346  $47,872  $56,345  $30,106  $56,023  $194,915 $46,942 $59,708 $33,187 $55,078 
  
   
   
   
   
  
 
 
 
 

     Additionally, the Company has the following commercial commitments:

(In thousands)

                            
(In thousands) Amounts of Commitment Expiration Per Period

 
 Amounts of Commitment Expiration Per Period
 Total  
Commercial Amounts Less than 1 - 3 4 - 5 After 5 Less than 1 - 2 4 - 5 After 5
Commitments Committed 1 year years years years Total 1 year years years years

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Standby Letters of Credit $120,507 $120,507     $120,507 $120,507    
Financial Responsibility Bonds 1,883 1,883     4,160 4,160    
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 
Total $122,390 $122,390     $124,667 $124,667    
 
 
 
 
 
  
 
 
 
 
 

Acquisitions

     The operating results of businesses acquired have been included in the accompanying consolidated financial statements from their respective dates of acquisition. Acquisitions made during the first quartersix months of 2003 are discussed in Note 96 to the consolidated financial statements.

Results of Operations

     The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company. All information in the discussion and references to the years and quarters are based on the Company’s fiscal year and firstsecond quarter which ended on October 31 and January 31,April 30, respectively.

15


Three Months Ended January 31,April 30, 2003 vs. Three Months Ended January 31,April 30, 2002

     Net income for the firstsecond quarter of 2003 was $4.3$9.9 million ($0.090.20 per diluted share), a decrease of $3.7$4.1 million or 45.7%29.3% from the net income of $8.0$14.0 million ($0.160.27 per diluted share) for the firstsecond quarter of 2002. Pretax income for the second quarter of 2002 included a gain of $4.3 million from an initial payment of $6.5 million from the September 11 insurance claim. Declines in operating profits from the Janitorial segment, primarily the

17


Northeast region,and Northwest regions, Lighting Parking and EngineeringParking segments as well as higher Corporate expenses accounted for the decrease in net income. The pretax operating loss from the Northeast region for the first quarter of 2003 was $4.6 million, compared to $0.4 million of operating profit for the same period last year. Operating profits for Lighting were $0.7 million and $1.9 million for the first quarter of 2003 and 2002, respectively. Partially offsetting the declines were operating profits totaling $2.8$2.7 million from acquisitions that did not impact results until after January 31,April 30, 2002, namely: Lakeside Building Maintenance Triumph Security Corporation, Triumph Cleaning Corporation(Lakeside) and Foulke Associates, Inc.the commercial self-performed janitorial cleaning operations from Horizon National Commercial Services (Horizon).

     Sales and other income (hereinafter called sales) for the firstsecond quarter of 2003 of $580.6$589.8 million increased by $53.0$63.9 million or 10.1%12.2% from $527.6$525.9 million for the firstsecond quarter of 2002. The increase is primarily due to $50.0$57.4 million in sales from acquisitions that did not impact results until after January 31,April 30, 2002. The remainder of the increase was attributable to new business, partially offset by the impact of contract terminations and declines in sales due to increased vacancies.real estate vacancies and decreased capital project work and extra services as customers tightened their budgets.

     As a percentage of sales, operating expenses and cost of goods sold were 90.7%89.3% for the firstsecond quarter of 2003, compared to 90.0%89.1% for the firstsecond quarter of 2002. Consequently, as a percentage of sales, the Company’s gross profit (sales minus operating expenses and cost of goods sold) of 9.3%10.7% in the firstsecond quarter of 2003 was lower than the gross profit of 10.0%10.9% for the second quarter of 2002. The decline was due primarily to lower margins on new business, declines in sales from higher margin business due to increased vacancies, and higher reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses from existing managed parking lot clients for which Parking had no margin benefit. Additionally, operating expenses for the second quarter of 2003 included higher insurance costs that could not be fully absorbed through increased pricing.

     Selling, general and administrative expenses for the second quarter of 2003 were $47.5 million compared to $38.8 million for the corresponding three months of 2002. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was due primarily to $4.3 million of selling, general and administrative expenses related to the Lakeside and Horizon acquisitions that did not impact results until after the second quarter of 2002. Additionally, corporate expenses for the first quarter of 2003 included higher directors and officers’ insurance costs and professional fees. As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 8.0% for the three months ended April 30, 2003 from 7.4% for the same period in 2002.

     Interest expense, which includes loan amortization and commitment fees for the revolving credit facility, was $0.18 million for the second quarter of 2003 compared to $0.23 million for the same period in 2002. The decrease was primarily due to

18


lower borrowings and interest rates during the second quarter of 2003, compared to the same period in 2002.

     The effective federal and state income tax rate was 36.5% for the second quarter of 2003, compared to 38.0% for the second quarter of 2002. The lower effective tax rate was primarily due to the impact of a lower estimated state tax rate and a higher proportional benefit from the same level of estimated federal tax credits applied to a lower level of pretax income.

19


Segment Information

     Under SFAS No. 131 criteria, Janitorial, Parking, Engineering, Security, Lighting, and Elevator are reportable segments. All other services are included in the “Other” segment. Corporate expenses are not allocated.

           
    Three months ended
    April 30,
(In thousands) 2003 2002

 
 
Sales and Other Income:
        
 Janitorial $343,505  $284,229 
 Parking  91,659   88,353 
 Engineering  43,945   42,667 
 Security  39,008   34,631 
 Lighting  33,577   32,071 
 Elevator  27,292   28,234 
 Other  10,741   15,532 
 Corporate  102   133 
    
   
 
  $589,829  $525,850 
    
   
 
Operating Profit:
        
 Janitorial $15,570  $16,327 
 Parking  1,022   1,783 
 Engineering  2,586   2,339 
 Security  1,160   1,065 
 Lighting  1,813   2,095 
 Elevator  1,043   608 
 Other  70   74 
 Corporate expense  (7,508)  (5,795)
    
   
 
  
Operating Profit
  15,756   18,496 
 Gain on insurance claim     4,300 
 Interest expense  (178)  (232)
    
   
 
 Income before income taxes $15,578  $22,564 
    
   
 

     The results of operations from the Company’s segments for the three months ended April��30, 2003, compared to the same period in 2002, are more fully described below.

     Sales for Janitorial were $59.3 million or 20.9% higher in the second quarter of 2003 than the same quarter of 2002, primarily due to the $57.4 million contribution from Lakeside acquired on July 12, 2002 and Horizon acquired on January 31, 2003. The remainder of the increase was attributable to new business, partially offset by the termination of unprofitable jobs in the Northeast and Southeast regions, the termination of a major contract due to collection issues in the Northwest region, declines in sales from existing contracts due to increased vacancies and decreased tag work or extra services as customers tightened their budgets. Operating profits in the second quarter of 2003 were $0.8 million

20


or 4.6% lower than the same period in 2002 primarily due to the $3.5 million decline in operating profits in almost all regions, particularly in the Northeast and Northwest regions, partially offset by $2.7 million of operating profit from Lakeside and Horizon. Competitive pressures, particularly from non-union companies, led to the pricing of new business at lower margins and prevented most regions of Janitorial from passing on the full amount of the insurance rate increase for 2003.

     The decline in operating profits in the Northwest region of Janitorial was due to the loss of a major contract and higher legal fees primarily due to a gender discrimination lawsuit filed against the Company by a former employee. On May 19, 2003, a Washington state court jury awarded $4 million in damages, plus plaintiff’s costs, to the former employee which the Company will appeal. The Company believes that the verdict was inconsistent with the law and facts of the case and that it will be reversed upon appeal. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any liability in its financial statements associated with the jury award.

     The decline in operating profits in the Northeast region of Janitorial was primarily due to new business competitively priced at lower margins and a decline in sales from higher margin business due to increased vacancies.

     Parking sales increased by $3.3 million or 3.7%, while its operating profits decreased by $0.8 million or 42.7% during the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002. The decrease in operating profits was primarily due to the adverse effect of the war against Iraq and fear of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on sales at airport and hotel facilities, increased insurance costs which could not be fully absorbed through increased pricing, and start-up costs incurred at the San Jose Airport. Of the $3.3 million sales increase, $2.5 million represented higher reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses from existing managed parking lot clients for which Parking had no margin benefit. The remainder of the sales increase was generated by net new business, partially offset by the decline in sales from the hi-tech areas of San Francisco and Seattle where the economic downturn resulted in high office building vacancies, the loss of a major contract in Seattle, and the decline in sales at airport and hotel facilities.

     Sales for Engineering increased $1.3 million or 3.0% from the second quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of 2003 due to new business. Operating profits increased by $0.2 million or 10.6% from the second quarter of 2002 to the second quarter of 2003 primarily due to increased business and the savings from the delay in replacing a vacant sales position.

21


     Security sales increased $4.4 million or 12.6% in the second quarter of 2003 compared the second quarter of 2002, primarily due to an increase of $1.6 million in the sales contributed by the operations acquired from Foulke Security on February 28, 2002, and the award of a national contract from Equity Office Properties on March 1, 2003, which contributed $1.8 million in sales in the second quarter of 2003. The remainder of the sales increase was generated by net new business throughout the country. Operating profits increased by only $0.1 million or 8.9% despite the significant increase in sales due to new business competitively bid at lower margins and start-up costs incurred in the second quarter of 2003 related to the new jobs acquired from Equity Office Properties.

     Lighting sales increased $1.5 million or 4.7% and gross profit margins improved during the second quarter of 2003 compared to the second quarter of 2002, however, operating profits decreased $0.3 million or 13.5% primarily due to higher selling, general and administrative expenses. The increase in sales was primarily due to increased project work partially offset by the termination of certain national contracts during the second quarter of 2003. Higher bad debt provision due to increased customer bankruptcies and the cost of hiring additional branch managers contributed to the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses during the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002.

     Sales for Elevator decreased by $0.9 million or 3.3% in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002, primarily due to reduced modernization sales in the Philadelphia and Chicago branches. Operating profits increased by $0.4 million or 71.5% for the second quarter of 2003, compared to the corresponding quarter of 2002, primarily due to accrued losses on unprofitable modernization contracts that were completed in 2003 but impacted 2002 results.

     Sales for the Other segment, which is comprised of CommAir Mechanical Services and ABM Facility Services, were down $4.8 million or 30.8% for the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period of 2002. The Other segment produced a profit of $70,000 in the second quarter of 2003 compared to $74,000 in the same period last year. Operating profits for the second quarter of 2002 included a $0.5 million write-down of work-in-progress. The lower sales and operating profits for the second quarter of 2003 were primarily due to decreased capital project work as customers tightened their budgets and ABM Facility Services’ loss of the Consolidated Freightways account in September 2002 after it declared bankruptcy.

     Corporate expenses increased by $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2003 compared to the same period of 2002. The increase

22


was due to higher premiums paid for directors and officers’ liability insurance and higher professional fees including expenses related to the due diligence performed for a proposed acquisition that was not completed.

Six Months Ended April 30, 2003 vs. Six Months Ended April 30, 2002

     Net income for the first half of 2003 was $14.2 million ($0.29 per diluted share), a decrease of $7.8 million or 35.3% from the net income of $22.0 million ($0.43 per diluted share) for the first half of 2002. Pretax income for the first half of 2002 included a gain of $4.3 million from an initial payment of $6.5 million from the September 11th insurance claim. Declines in operating profits from the Janitorial segment, primarily the Northeast and Northwest regions, Lighting and Parking segments as well as higher Corporate expenses accounted for the decrease in net income. Partially offsetting the declines were operating profits totaling $5.3 million from the Lakeside and Horizon acquisitions that did not impact results until after April 30, 2002.

     Sales and other income (hereinafter called sales) for the first half of 2003 of $1,170.5 million increased by $117.1 million or 11.1% from $1,053.4 million for the first half of 2002. The increase is primarily due to $100.5 million in sales from acquisitions that did not impact results until after April 30, 2002. The remainder of the increase was attributable to new business, partially offset by the impact of contract terminations and declines in sales due to increased vacancies and decreased project work and extra services as customers tightened their budgets.

     As a percentage of sales, operating expenses and cost of goods sold were 90.0% for the first half of 2003, compared to 89.6% for the first half of 2002. Consequently, as a percentage of sales, the Company’s gross profit of 10.0% in the first half of 2003 was lower than the gross profit of 10.4% for the first half of 2002. The decline was due primarily to lower margins on new business, delays in planned terminations of unprofitable contracts in the Northeast region of Janitorial, higher labor costs in Lighting,a decline in sales from higher margin business due to increased vacancies, and higher reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses from existing managed parking lot clients for which Parking had no margin benefit. Additionally, operating expenses for the first quarterhalf of 2003 included higher insurance costs whichthat could not be fully absorbed through increased pricing.

     Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first quarterhalf of 2003 were $47.6$95.1 million compared to $39.6$78.4 million for the corresponding three monthsperiod of 2002. The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was due primarily to $3.3

16


$7.4 million of selling, general and administrative expenses related to Lakeside

23


and Horizon acquisitions that did not impact results until after the first quarterhalf of 2002. The Northeast region of Janitorial contributed $1.0$1.4 million to the increase primarily as a result of higher legal expenses and costs associated with implementing management changes in the region. Additionally, the first quarterhalf of 2003 reflects a $1.0$1.2 million increase in bad debt expense as well as higher employer contributions to the Company’s 401(k) plan, which was enhanced effective January 1, 2002. Furthermore, corporate expenses for the first quarterhalf of 2003 included higher directors and officers’ insurance costs and professional fees. As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 8.2%8.1% for the threesix months ended January 31,April 30, 2003 from 7.5%7.4% for the same period in 2002.

     Interest expense, which includes loan amortization and commitment fees for the revolving credit facility, was $0.1$0.3 million for the first quarterhalf of 2003 compared to $0.3$0.5 million for the same period in 2002. The decrease was primarily due to lower borrowings and interest rates during the first quarterhalf of 2003, compared to the same period in 2002.

     The effective federal and state income tax rate was 33.4%35.6% for the first quarterhalf of 2003, compared to 38.0% for the first quarterhalf of 2002. The lower effective tax rate was mostly due to the impact of a lower estimated state tax rate and a higher proportional benefit from the same level of estimated federal tax credits applied to a lower level of pretax income.

Segment Information

     Under SFAS No. 131 criteria, Janitorial, Parking, Engineering, Security, Lighting, and Elevator are reportable segments. All other services are included in the “Other” segment. Corporate expenses are not allocated.

24


           
    Six months ended
    April 30,
(In thousands) 2003 2002
  
 
Sales and Other Income:
        
 Janitorial $674,357  $571,029 
 Parking  186,074   177,839 
 Engineering  89,572   86,337 
 Security  76,797   66,794 
 Lighting  66,723   64,638 
 Elevator  55,474   54,727 
 Other  21,225   31,688 
 Corporate  233   350 
    
   
 
  $1,170,455  $1,053,402 
    
   
 
Operating Profit:
        
 Janitorial $23,377  $27,170 
 Parking  1,612   2,831 
 Engineering  4,616   4,660 
 Security  2,502   2,260 
 Lighting  2,493   4,004 
 Elevator  1,994   1,524 
 Other  (53)  772 
 Corporate expense  (14,148)  (11,572)
    
   
 
  
Operating Profit
  22,393   31,649 
 Gain on insurance claim     4,300 
 Interest expense  (303)  (497)
    
   
 
 Income before income taxes $22,090  $35,452 
    
   
 

The results of operations from the Company’s segments for the threesix months ended January 31,April 30, 2003, compared to the same period in 2002, are more fully described below. The sales and operating profits of the segments are set forth in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements.

     Sales for Janitorial were $44.1$103.3 million or 15.4%18.1% higher in the first quarterhalf of 2003 than the same quarterhalf of 2002, primarily due to the $43.1$100.5 million contribution from Lakeside Building Maintenance acquired inon July 2002.12, 2002 and Horizon acquired on January 31, 2003. The remainder of the increase was attributable to new business, partially offset by the termination of unprofitable jobs in the Northeast and Southeast regions and the termination of a major contract due to collection issues in the Northwest region, declines in sales from higher marginexisting contracts due to increased vacancies.vacancies and decreased tag work or extra services as customers tightened their budgets. Operating profits in the first quarterhalf of 2003 were $3.0$3.8 million or 28.0%14.0% lower than the same period in 2002 primarily due to the $5.0$6.3 million and $1.1 million decline in operating profits in the Northeast region,and Northwest regions, respectively, which was partially offset by $2.6$5.3 million of operating profit from Lakeside Building Maintenance.and Horizon. Additionally, operating expenses included higher insurance costs which could not be fully absorbed through increased pricing.

1725


     The decline in operating profits in the Northwest region of Janitorial was due to the loss of a major contract and higher legal fees primarily due to a gender discrimination lawsuit filed against the Company by a former employee. On May 19, 2003, a Washington state court jury awarded $4 million in damages, plus plaintiff’s costs, to the former employee which the Company will appeal. The Company believes that the verdict was inconsistent with the law and facts of the case and that it will be reversed upon appeal. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any liability in its financial statements associated with the jury award.

     The decline in operating profits in the Northeast region of Janitorial, especially in New York City, was primarily impacted bydue to new business competitively priced at lower margins and a decline in sales from higher labor costs,margin business due to increased vacancies, delays in planned terminations of unprofitable contracts, and bad weather in the first quarter of 2003. Further, first quarter 2002 results for New York City operations benefited from the extra clean-up work performed following the September 1111th attacks. While such additional work has substantially diminished, higher labor costs continued in the first quarter of 2003 as displaced senior workers from the World Trade Center related accounts replaced less senior lower wage employees assigned to existing jobs. Additionally, the region’s operating profits for the first quarterhalf of 2003 included higher unused sick leave payments, legal fees related to a lawsuit in connection with the collection of outstanding amounts from a large former customer, and costs associated with implementing management changes in this region.

     Parking sales increased by $4.9$8.2 million or 5.5%4.6%, while its operating profits decreased by $0.5$1.2 million or 43.7%43.1% during the first quartersix months of 2003 compared to the first quartersix months of 20022002. The decrease in operating profits was primarily due to increased insurance costs which could not be fully absorbed through increased pricing.pricing, the adverse effect of the war against Iraq and fear of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) on sales at airport and hotel facilities, and start-up costs incurred at the San Jose Airport. Of the $4.9$8.2 million sales increase, $2.1$4.7 million represented higher reimbursements for out-of-pocket expenses from existing managed parking lot clients for which Parking had no margin benefit. The remainder of the sales increase was generated by net new business, that commenced after January 31, 2002, partially offset by the decline in sales from the hi-tech areas of San Francisco and Seattle where the economic downturn resulted in high office building vacancies. Althoughvacancies, the new contracts generated higherloss of a major contract in Seattle, and the decline in sales due to competitive pressures, they were priced at lower margins which further contributed to the reduced operating profits.airport and hotel facilities.

     Sales for Engineering increased $2.0$3.2 million or 4.5%3.7% from the first quarterhalf of 2002 to the first quarterhalf of 2003 due to new business. Operating profits decreased by $0.3 million$44,000 or 12.5%0.9% from the first quarterhalf of 2002 to the first quarterhalf of 2003, primarily due to a settlement with a competitor firm on a bid-related issue, difficulty in passing along insurance increases to customers, and consulting costs associated with a study to assist Engineering to expand into

26


new markets and broaden the scope of its services.services, partially offset by the savings from the delay in replacing a vacant sales position.

     Security sales increased $5.6$10.0 million or 17.5%15.0% in the first half of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002, primarily due to an increase of $8.8 million in the sales contributed by the acquisitions ofoperations acquired from Triumph Security on January 26, 2002 and Foulke Security on February 28, 2002 totaling $6.6 million. Partially offsetting2002. Furthermore, the salesaward of a national contract from acquisitions was the decreaseEquity Office Properties on March 1, 2003 contributed $1.8 million in tag sales or sales in addition to the contractual fees, in the first quartersix months of 2003 compared to the first quarter of 2002, which experienced unusually high tag sales due to heightened security after the September 11 terrorist attack.2003. Operating profits increased by only $0.1$0.2 million or 12.3%10.7% despite the significant increase in sales due to higher labornew business competitively bid at lower margins, and insurance costs.

18


start-up costs incurred in the second half of 2003 related to the new jobs acquired from Equity Office Properties.

     Lighting sales increased $0.6$2.1 million or 1.8%3.2% and gross profit margins improved during the first quarterhalf of 2003 compared to the first quarterhalf of 2002, with a $1.2but operating profits decreased $1.5 million or 64.4% decrease in operating profits37.7% primarily due to higher labor costsselling, general and administrative expenses particularly in the Northeast and North Central regions. Sales were about flat as contracts lost were replaced by contracts with much lower margins further contributing to the reduced operating profits. A number of newer national contracts in fact operated at a loss as a result of aggressive pricing which did not take into account higher labor costs demanded by covering a wider geographic area of service. These contracts are currently being reviewed for a price adjustment negotiation or a thirty-day cancellation. The Northeast and North Central regions changed the management of several branches and incurred higher labor-related costs due to training and double management during the transition. Declinedecline in operating profits was partially offset by a $0.3 million gain recognized in the first quarter of 2003 related to the early termination of a contract. Increase in sales was primarily due to increased project work, partially offset by the termination of certain national contracts during the first half of 2003. The Northeast and North Central regions changed management as well as hired additional managers in several branches and incurred higher labor-related costs due to training and double management during the transition.

     Sales for Elevator increased by $1.7$0.7 million or 6.4%1.4% in the first quarterhalf of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002, primarily due to increased repair business and operatingservice extras, or work generating fees in addition to the regular contractual fee. Operating profits increased by $35,000$0.5 million or 3.8%30.8% for the first quarterhalf of 2003, compared to the corresponding quarterperiod of 2002, primarily due to increased repair andaccrued losses on unprofitable modernization business. Partially offsetting the operating profits from new business was the labor cost for an extra work weekcontracts that were completed in Elevator’s accounting cycle for the first quarter of 2003.2003 but impacted 2002 results.

     Sales for the Other segment which is comprised of CommAir Mechanical Services and ABM Facility Services, were down $5.7$10.5 million or 35.1%33.0% for the first quarter.half. The Other segment produced a loss of $0.1 million$53,000 in the first quarterhalf of 2003 compared to a profit of $0.7$0.8 million in the same period last year. The lower revenues and operating profits for the quarter were primarily due to fewer projectsdecreased capital project work as customers tightened their budgets and ABM Facility Services’ loss of the Consolidated Freightways account in September 2002 after it declared bankruptcy.

     The increase in27


     Corporate expenses amounted to $0.9increased by $2.6 million in the first quarterhalf of 2003 compared to the same period of 2002. The increase was due to higher premiums paid for directors and officers’ liability insurance, as well ashigher professional fees including expenses related to the due diligence performed for a proposed acquisition that was not completed, and increased expenses related to the use of outside counsel while in the process of hiring a Corporate General Counsel. The new General Counsel was hired on May 1, 2003.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

     In July 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS No. 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are

19


incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. Examples of costs covered by the standard include lease termination costs and certain employee severance costs that are associated with a restructuring, discontinued operation, plant closing, or other exit or disposal activity. SFAS No.146 replaces EITF Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring).” SFAS No. 146 is to be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. Management does not expect this statement to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

     In November 2002, FASB issued Financial Interpretation No. (FIN) 45, “Guarantor’s Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others.” FIN 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee, the guarantor must disclose and recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. The initial recognition and measurement requirement of FIN 45 is effective for guarantees issued or modified after December 31, 2002 while the disclosure requirements are effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2002. At January 31,April 30, 2003, the Company has no guarantees to disclose under FIN 45.

     In January 2003, FASB issued FIN 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities,” an interpretation of ARB No. 51. FIN 46 addresses the consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities as defined in the interpretation. FIN 46 applies immediately to variable interests in variable interest entities created after January 31, 2003; and for the first fiscal year or interim period beginning after June 15, 2003 for variable interest entities in which an enterprise holds a variable interest that it acquired before February 1, 2003. Analysis of the Company’s interest in variable interest entities at April 30, 2003 indicates

28


that no consolidation will be required. The application of FIN 46 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

     The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires the Company to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to self-insurance reserves, allowance for doubtful accounts, valuation allowance for the net deferred income tax asset, contingencies and litigation liabilities. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience, independent valuations, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

     The Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements.

     Self-Insurance Reserves:Certain insurable risks such as general liability, automobile property damage and workers’ compensation are self-insured by the Company. However, the Company has umbrella insurance coverage for certain risk exposures subject

20


to specified limits. Accruals for claims under the Company’s self-insurance program are recorded on a claim-incurred basis. The Company uses an independent actuarial firm to annually evaluate and estimate the range of the Company’s claim costs and liabilities. The Company accrues the minimum amount of the actuarial range of exposure. Using the annual actuarial report, management develops annual insurance costs for each division, expressed as a rate per $100 of exposure (labor and revenue) to estimate insurance costs on a quarterly basis. Additionally, management monitors new claims and claim development to assess the adequacy of the insurance reserves. The estimated future charge is intended to reflect the recent experience and trends. If the number of claims incurred were to increase, or the severity of the claims were to increase, the Company may be required to record an additional expense for self-insurance liabilities.

     Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:The Company’s accounts receivable arise from services provided to its customers and are generally due and payable on terms varying from the receipt of invoice to net thirty days. The Company estimates an allowance for accounts it does not consider collectible. Changes in the financial

29


condition of the customer or adverse development in negotiations or legal proceedings to obtain payment could result in the actual loss exceeding the estimated allowance.

     Deferred Income Tax Asset Valuation Allowance:Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between the amount of assets and liabilities recognized for financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes. If management determines it is more likely than not that the net deferred tax asset will be realized, no valuation allowance is recorded. At January 31,April 30, 2003, the net deferred tax asset was $64.3$65.9 million and no valuation allowance was recorded. Should future income be less than anticipated, the net deferred tax asset may not be recoverable.

     Contingencies and Litigation:ABM and certain of its subsidiaries have been named defendants in certain litigationlitigations arising in the ordinary course of business including certain environmental matters. When a loss is probable and estimable the Company records the estimated loss. The actual loss may be greater than estimated or litigation where the outcome was not considered probable may result in a loss.

Environmental Matters

     The nature of the Company’s operations, primarily services, would not ordinarily involve it in environmental contamination. However, the Company’s operations are subject to various federal, state and/or local laws regulating the discharge of materials into

21


the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment, such as discharge into soil, water and air, and the generation, handling, storage, transportation and disposal of waste and hazardous substances. These laws generally have the effect of increasing costs and potential liabilities associated with the conduct of the Company’s operations, although historically they have not had a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows or its results of operations.operations, or cash flows.

     The Company is currently involved in fivethree proceedings relating to environmental matters: one involving alleged potential soil and groundwater contamination at a Company facility in Florida; one involving alleged potential soil contamination at a former Company facility in Arizona; one involving alleged potential soil and groundwater contamination at a former dry-cleaning facility leased by the Company in Nevada; one involving alleged potential soil contamination at a former parking facility leased by the Company in Washington; and one involving alleged potential soil and groundwater contamination at a third party recycling center in Southern California. While it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, based on information currently available, management believes that none of these matters, individually or in the aggregate, are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, cash flows, or results of operations. Threeoperations, or cash flows.

30


Two of the fivethree proceedings are subject to ongoing settlement negotiations and a reserve of $0.5 million has been set aside for the potential liability. The liability related to the other two claimsclaim is neither probable nor estimable, hence no accruals haveaccrual has been made related to these matters.this matter.

     Two other proceedings relating to environmental matters that existed at January 31, 2003 were resolved in the second quarter of 2003. A settlement agreement was executed and a payment of $0.1 million was made for one proceeding, which involved alleged potential soil contamination at a former parking facility leased by the Company in Washington. The other proceeding involving alleged potential soil and groundwater contamination at a Company facility in Florida was resolved and does not require any further action.

Safe Harbor Statement

     Cautionary Safe Harbor Disclosure for Forward Looking Statements under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Because of the factors set forth below, as well as other variables affecting the Company’s operating results, past financial performance should not be considered a reliable indicator of future performance, and investors should not use historical trends to anticipate results or trends in future periods. The statements contained herein which are not historical facts are forward-looking statements that are subject to meaningful risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to: (1) significant decreases in commercial real estate occupancy, resulting in reduced demand and pricing pressures on building maintenance and other facility services in the Company’s major markets, (2) inability to pass through cost increases in a timely manner, or at all, or to reduce expenses when sales decline, (3) loss or bankruptcy of one or more of the Company’s major customers, which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to collect its accounts receivable or recover its deferred costs as well as having an adverse impact on future revenue, (4) major collective bargaining issues that may

22


cause loss of revenues or cost increases that non-union companiescompetitors can use to their advantage in gaining market share, (5) significant shortfalls in adding additional customers in existing and new territories and markets, (6) inability to successfully integrate acquisitions into the Company, (7) a protracted slowdown in the Company’s acquisition activities, (7)(8) legislation or other governmental action that severely impacts one or more of the Company’s lines of business, such as price controls that could restrict price increases, or the unrecovered cost of any universal employer-paid health insurance, as well as government investigations that adversely affect the Company, (8)(9) reduction or revocation of the Company’s line of credit, which would increase interest expense or the cost of capital, (9)(10) cancellation or nonrenewal of the Company’s primary insurance policies, as many customers contract out services based

31


on the contractor’s ability to provide adequate insurance coverage and limits, (10)(11) catastrophic uninsured or underinsured claims against the Company, the inability of the Company’s insurance carriers to pay otherwise insured claims, or inadequacy in the Company’s reserve for self-insured claims, (11)(12) inability to employ entry level personnel at competitive wage rates due to labor shortages, (12)(13) resignation, termination, death or disability of one or more of the Company’s key executives, which could adversely affect customer retention and day-to-day management of the Company, (13) inability to successfully integrate acquisitions into the Company, and (14) other material factors that are disclosed from time to time in the Company’s public filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, such as reports on Forms 8-K 10-K and 10-Q.10-K.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

     The Company does not issue or invest in financial instruments or their derivatives for trading or speculative purposes. The operations of the Company are conducted primarily in the United States, and, as such, are not subject to material foreign currency exchange rate risk. The Company has no outstanding debt. Although the Company had over $11$3 million in cash and cash equivalents at January 31,April 30, 2003, market rate risk associated with falling interest rates in the United States is not material.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

     (a)       Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.ABM’s chief executive officer and ABM’s chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Rules 13a-14(c) and 15d-14(c) as of a date (the “Evaluation Date”) within 90 days prior to the filing date of this Form 10-Q, have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were adequate and designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company including its

23


consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities.

     (b)     Changes in internal controls.There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or, to the Company’s knowledge, in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the Evaluation Date.

32


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Stockholders

     a)     The Annual Meeting of Stockholders was held on March 11, 2003.

     b)     The following directors were elected by a vote of stockholders: Linda L. Chavez, Theodore T. Rosenberg, Henrik C. Slipsager, and William W. Steele. Linda L. Chavez, Theodore T. Rosenberg, and Henrik C. Slipsager will serve for a term ending at the annual meeting in the year 2006. William W. Steele will serve for a term ending at the annual meeting in the year 2004.

          The following directors remained in office: Luke S. Helms, Maryellen C. Herringer, Charles T. Horngren, Henry L. Kotkins, Jr., and Martinn H. Mandles.

     c)     The following matters were voted upon at the meeting:

     (1)     Proposal 1 - Election of Directors.

         
Nominee For Withheld

 
 
Linda L. Chavez  39,453,954   3,540,423 
Theodore T. Rosenberg  41,555,391   1,438,986 
Henrik C. Slipsager  40,175,655   2,818,722 
William W. Steele  40,977,911   2,016,466 

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)Exhibits:

   
(a)Exhibits:
   
 Exhibit 10.784.1     -Credit Agreement dated as of June 28, 2002, among ABM Industries Incorporated, various financial institutions and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, as amended through April 23, 2003
 - -Corporate Executive Employment Agreement with James P. McClure as of November 1, 2002
 
 Exhibit 99.1- -Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
 
 Exhibit 99.2- -Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

(b)Reports on Form 8-K: No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended January 31,April 30, 2003.

2433


SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

   
  ABM Industries Incorporated
 
March 12,June 11, 2003 /s/ George B. Sundby

George B. Sundby

Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Principal Financial Officer
 
March 12,June 11, 2003 /s/ Maria Placida Y. de la Peña

Maria Placida Y. de la Peña

Vice President and Controller
Chief Accounting Officer

2534


CERTIFICATIONS

I, Henrik C. Slipsager, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ABM Industries Incorporated;
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

   
March 12,June 11, 2003 /s/ Henrik C. Slipsager

Henrik C. Slipsager
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)

2635


I, George B. Sundby, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ABM Industries Incorporated;
 
2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this quarterly report;
 
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this quarterly report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this quarterly report;
 
4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have:

 a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;
 
 b) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this quarterly report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
 
 c) presented in this quarterly report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

 a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
 
 b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal controls; and

6. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have indicated in this quarterly report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

   
March 12,June 11, 2003 /s/ George B. Sundby
  
  George B. Sundby
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

2736


EXHIBIT INDEX

   
Exhibit No. Description

 
10.784.1 Corporate Executive EmploymentCredit Agreement with James P. McCluredated as of November 1,June 28, 2002, among ABM Industries Incorporated, various financial institutions and Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent, as amended through April 23, 2003
   
99.1 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
99.2 Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002