UNITED STATES SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

~~FORM~~ Form 10-Q


þ		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934


		For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2006

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the Transition period from to

~~For the Transition period from~~toCommission File Number 001-32373

~~Commission File Number 001-32373~~

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

(Exact name of registration as specified in its charter)


Nevada		27-0099920

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


3355 Las Vegas Boulevard South
Las Vegas, Nevada		~~89109~~

(Address of principal executive offices)		89109 (Zip Code)

(702) 414-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or ~~15 (d)~~15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ ~~Yes~~ Noo

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


~~Large accelerated filer~~þ		Large accelerated filer þAccelerated filero Non-accelerated filer o		~~Non-accelerated filer~~o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yeso Noþ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the Registrant’s classes of common stock, as of ~~May~~August 1, 2006.

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.


Class		Outstanding at ~~May~~August 1, 2006

Common Stock ($0.001 par value)		~~354,317,234~~354,365,124 shares

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

Table of Contents


~~Part I~~ ~~FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~

Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. ~~Financial Statements (unaudited)~~	Financial Statements (unaudited)


Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005	3	1


Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 and ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005	4	2


Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Three~~Six Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 and ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005	5	3


Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements		4	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		27

Item 3.		20

~~Item 3.~~ Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	45

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	34	46

Part II OTHER INFORMATION

Item ~~4. Controls and Procedures~~1.		35
Legal Proceedings	46

~~Part II~~ ~~OTHER INFORMATION~~Item 1A.	Risk Factors		47

Item ~~1. Legal Proceedings~~2.		36

~~Item 1A. Risk Factors~~		36

~~Item 2.~~ Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	47

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	36	47

Item 6.	Exhibits		48

Signatures
~~Item 6. Exhibits~~		37

~~Signatures~~		38	49
~~EX-31.1~~Ex-10.1
~~EX-31.2~~Ex-10.2
~~EX-32.1~~Ex-10.3
EX-10.4
Ex-31.1
Ex-31.2
Ex-32.1
EX-32.2

~~ITEM~~Item 1 — ~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~(In thousands, except share data)~~

March 31, December 31,
2006 2005
ASSETS

Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 317,277 $ 456,846
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 113,221 71,717
Accounts receivable, net 108,450 84,778
Inventories 10,645 9,967
Deferred income taxes 10,363 7,946
Prepaid expenses and other 18,175 13,452

Total current assets 578,131 644,706

Property and equipment, net 2,887,413 2,600,468
Deferred offering costs, net 28,956 30,973
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 577,425 571,143
Deferred income taxes 2,064 11,332
Other assets, net 23,345 21,117

$ 4,097,334 $ 3,879,739

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable $ 44,259 $ 34,803
Construction payables 182,750 163,932
Accrued interest payable 3,277 7,918
Other accrued liabilities 249,953 246,390
Income taxes payable 8,200 —
Current maturities of long-term debt 7,490 7,325

Total current liabilities 495,929 460,368

Other long-term liabilities 11,775 9,804
Deferred gain on sale of The Grand Canal Shops mall 67,263 68,129
Deferred rent from The Grand Canal Shops mall transaction 105,693 105,999
Long-term debt 1,679,846 1,625,901

2,360,506 2,270,201

Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 354,317,234 and 354,179,580 shares issued and outstanding 354 354
Capital in excess of par value 970,305 964,660
Deferred compensation — (150 )
Accumulated other comprehensive income 1,438 1,726
Retained earnings 764,731 642,948

1,736,828 1,609,538

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 4,097,334 $ 3,879,739

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations


		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,

		2006			2005			2006			2005

		(In thousands, except share and per share data)
		(Unaudited)
Revenues:
	Casino	$	378,462		$	274,808		$	753,844		$	540,594
	Rooms		89,654			83,983			180,792			170,060
	Food and beverage		44,023			34,698			95,839			78,187
	Convention, retail and other		29,276			24,354			64,281			52,808

			541,415			417,843			1,094,756			841,649
Less-promotional allowances			(24,408	)		(19,022	)		(47,385	)		(39,034	)

	Net revenues		517,007			398,821			1,047,371			802,615

Operating expenses:
	Casino		217,244			146,546			422,586			278,499
	Rooms		21,996			20,227			43,748			41,342
	Food and beverage		22,813			17,879			46,871			38,844
	Convention, retail and other		15,728			13,723			32,122			28,099
	Provision for doubtful accounts		3,321			782			8,310			4,168
	General and administrative		57,337			48,214			112,152			93,987
	Corporate expense		12,251			6,620			25,205			17,502
	Rental expense		3,803			3,682			7,510			7,387
	Pre-opening expense		4,354			504			6,573			504
	Development expense		7,861			5,562			17,029			10,737
	Depreciation and amortization		24,428			21,097			49,433			41,062
	(Gain) loss on disposal of assets		456			(158	)		1,537			1,005

			391,592			284,678			773,076			563,136

Operating income			125,415			114,143			274,295			239,479
Other income (expense):
	Interest income		15,018			7,133			25,232			14,527
	Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized		(23,685	)		(17,969	)		(45,100	)		(45,052	)
	Other income (expense)		(14	)		(1,291	)		150			(1,291	)
	Loss on early retirement of debt		—			(4,166	)		—			(137,000	)

Income before income taxes			116,734			97,850			254,577			70,663
Benefit (provision) for income taxes			(7,405	)		(11,421	)		(23,465	)		22,878

Net income		$	109,329		$	86,429		$	231,112		$	93,541

Basic earnings per share		$	0.31		$	0.24		$	0.65		$	0.26

Diluted earnings per share		$	0.31		$	0.24		$	0.65		$	0.26

Weighted average shares outstanding:
	Basic		354,255,635			354,160,692			354,227,600			354,160,692

	Diluted		355,259,487			354,795,833			354,803,220			354,853,970

~~(In thousands, except share and per share data)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2006 2005
Revenues:
Casino $ 375,382 $ 265,786
Rooms 91,138 86,077
Food and beverage 51,816 43,489
Convention, retail and other 35,005 28,454

553,341 423,806
Less-promotional allowances (22,977 ) (20,012 )

Net revenues 530,364 403,794

Operating expenses:
Casino 205,344 131,953
Rooms 21,753 21,115
Food and beverage 24,057 20,965
Convention, retail and other 16,395 14,376
Provision for doubtful accounts 4,989 3,386
General and administrative 54,812 45,773
Corporate expense 12,954 10,882
Rental expense 3,707 3,705
Pre-opening expense 2,219 —
Development expense 9,168 5,175
Depreciation and amortization 25,005 19,965
Loss on disposal of assets 1,081 1,163

381,484 278,458

Operating income 148,880 125,336

Other income (expense):
Interest income 10,214 7,394
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized (21,415 ) (27,083 )
Other income 164 —
Loss on early retirement of debt — (132,834 )

Income (loss) before income taxes 137,843 (27,187 )

Benefit (provision) for income taxes (16,060 ) 34,299

Net income $ 121,783 $ 7,112

Basic earnings per share $ 0.34 $ 0.02

Diluted earnings per share $ 0.34 $ 0.02

Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic 354,199,253 354,160,692

Diluted 354,592,597 355,029,968

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


			Six Months Ended
			June 30,

			2006			2005

			(Dollars in thousands)
			(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income			$	231,112		$	93,541
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
	Depreciation and amortization			49,433			41,062
	Amortization of deferred financing costs and original issue discount			4,634			5,010
	Amortization of deferred gain and rent			(2,345	)		(2,346	)
	Loss on early retirement of debt			—			137,000
	Loss on disposal of assets			1,537			1,005
	Stock-based compensation			5,724			—
	Provision for doubtful accounts			8,310			4,168
	Tax benefit from stock option exercises			(632	)		7,424
	Deferred income taxes			10,932			(30,302	)
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
		Accounts receivable		(10,471	)		(13,972	)
		Inventories		(853	)		(759	)
		Prepaid income taxes		(16,168	)		—
		Prepaid expenses and other		(205,612	)		(3,355	)
		Accounts payable		10,880			20,638
		Accrued interest payable		(601	)		(2,337	)
		Other accrued liabilities		11,301			26,750

Net cash provided by operating activities				97,181			283,527

Cash flows from investing activities:
Change in restricted cash				(1,034,881	)		(5,181	)
Capital expenditures				(730,475	)		(373,565	)

Net cash used in investing activities				(1,765,356	)		(378,746	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Dividends paid to shareholders				—			(21,052	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options				3,180			—
Tax benefit from stock option exercises				632			—
Repayments on 11% mortgage notes				—			(843,640	)
Proceeds from 6.375% senior notes, net of discount				—			247,722
Proceeds from senior secured credit facility-term B				—			305,000
Proceeds from Macao credit facility				1,325,000			—
Proceeds from senior secured credit facility-revolver				254,129			—
Proceeds from phase II mall construction loan				30,000			10,500
Proceeds from other long-term debt				75			—
Repayments on Venetian Intermediate credit facility				(50,000	)		—
Repayment on senior secured credit facility-revolver				(25,000	)		—
Repayments on Interface mortgage note payable				(2,807	)		(2,448	)
Repayments on FF&E credit facility				(1,800	)		(600	)
Repayments on Venetian Macao senior secured notes — tranche A				—			(75,000	)
Repayments on Venetian Macao senior secured notes — tranche B				—			(45,000	)
Repurchase premiums incurred in connection with refinancing transactions				—			(113,311	)
Transaction costs, initial public offering				—			(487	)
Payments of deferred financing costs				(41,056	)		(11,169	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities				1,492,353			(549,485	)

Effect of exchange rate on cash				975			—

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents				(174,847	)		(644,704	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period				456,846			1,294,898

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period			$	281,999		$	650,194

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash payments for interest			$	69,725		$	51,494

Cash payments for taxes			$	28,000		$	—

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Property and equipment acquisitions included in construction payables			$	231,702		$	163,932

~~(Dollars in thousands)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2006 2005
Cash flows from operating activities:

Net income $ 121,783 $ 7,112
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 25,005 19,965
Amortization of debt offering costs and original issue discount 2,074 2,723
Amortization of deferred revenue (1,172 ) (1,173 )
Loss on early retirement of debt — 132,834
Loss on disposal of assets 1,081 1,163
Stock-based compensation 2,862 —
Provision for doubtful accounts 4,989 3,386
Tax benefit from stock option exercises (632 ) 7,424
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable (28,661 ) (22,563 )
Inventories (678 ) (324 )
Prepaid expenses and other (6,857 ) (4,361 )
Deferred income taxes 6,851 (41,723 )
Accounts payable 9,456 (5,856 )
Accrued interest payable (4,641 ) (4,695 )
Other accrued liabilities 5,534 (14,789 )
Income taxes payable 8,832 —

Net cash provided by operating activities 145,826 79,123

Cash flows from investing activities:

Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents (47,786 ) (4,481 )
Capital expenditures (294,233 ) (152,164 )

Net cash used in investing activities (342,019 ) (156,645 )

Cash flows from financing activities:

Dividends paid to shareholders — (21,052 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 1,864 —
Tax benefit from stock option exercises 632 —
Repayments on 11% mortgage notes — (843,640 )
Proceeds from 6.375% senior notes, net of discount — 247,754
Proceeds from senior secured credit facility-term B — 305,000
Proceeds from senior secured credit facility-revolver 92,129 —
Proceeds from Phase II mall construction loan 14,000 —
Proceeds from other long-term debt 75 —
Repayments on Venetian Intermediate credit facility (50,000 ) —
Repayments on FF&E credit facility (1,200 ) —
Repayments on Interface mortgage note payable (951 ) (1,334 )
Repurchase premiums incurred in connection with refinancing transactions — (93,289 )
Transaction costs, initial public offering — (487 )
Payments of debt offering costs — (10,717 )

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 56,549 (417,765 )

Effect of exchange rate on cash 75 —

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (139,569 ) (495,287 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 456,846 1,294,898

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 317,277 $ 799,611

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

Cash payments for interest $ 31,905 $ 33,139

Non-cash investing and financing activities:

Property and equipment asset acquisitions included in construction payables $ 182,750 $ 89,501

Property and equipment acquisitions included in accounts payable $ — $ 1,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial ~~Statements~~statements.

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 — ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS OF COMPANY

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K of Las Vegas Sands Corp. and its subsidiaries (collectively the “Company”) for the year ended December 31, 2005. The year-end balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America. In addition, certain amounts in the 2005 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 2006 presentation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments and normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim period have been included. The interim results reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are not necessarily indicative of expected results for the full year.

Las Vegas Sands Corp. (“LVSC”) was incorporated in Nevada during August 2004 and completed an initial public offering of its common stock in December 2004. Immediately prior to the initial public offering LVSC acquired 100% of the capital stock of Las Vegas Sands, Inc., which was converted into a Nevada limited liability company, Las Vegas Sands, LLC (“LVSLLC”), in July 2005. The acquisition of LVSLLC by LVSC has been accounted for as a reorganization of entities under common control, in a manner similar to ~~pooling-of-interests.~~pooling-of-interests. LVSC is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “LVS.”

~~Las Vegas Properties~~


	*Las Vegas Properties*

The Company owns and operates The Venetian Resort Hotel Casino (“The Venetian”), a Renaissance Venice-themed resort situated on the Las Vegas Strip (the “Strip”). ~~The Venetian is located across from The Mirage and the Treasure Island Hotel and Casino and next to the Wynn Las Vegas Resort.~~ The Venetian includes the first all-suites hotel on the Strip with 4,027 suites; a gaming facility of approximately 116,000 square feet; an enclosed retail, dining and entertainment complex of approximately 440,000 net leasable square feet (the “Grand Canal Shops” or the “Mall”);, which was sold to a third party in ~~2004,~~2004; a meeting and conference facility of approximately 1.1 million square feet; and an expo and convention center of approximately 1.2 million square feet (“The Sands Expo Center”). The Company has commenced construction work on the site of The Palazzo Resort Hotel Casino (“The Palazzo”), a second resort similar in size to The Venetian, which is situated on a ~~14 acre~~14-acre site next to The Venetian and The Sands Expo Center and next to the Wynn Las Vegas Resort. The Palazzo is expected to consist of an all-suites,50-floor luxury hotel tower with approximately 3,025 suites, a gaming facility of approximately 105,000 square feet and an enclosed shopping, dining and entertainment complex of approximately 450,000 square feet, which the Company has contracted to sell to a third party.

~~Macao Projects~~


	*Macao Projects*

The Company also owns and operates The Sands Macao, a Las Vegas-style casino in Macao, China, which ~~was~~ opened on May 18, 2004. In addition to The Sands Macao, the Company is also constructing The Venetian Macao Resort Hotel Casino (“The Venetian Macao”), an approximately 3,000 all-suites hotel, casino, and convention center complex, with a Venetian-style theme similar to that of its Las Vegas property. Under its gaming subconcession in Macao, the Company was obligated to develop and open The Venetian Macao by June 2006 and a convention center by December 2006, and invest, or cause to be invested, at least 4.4 billion patacas (approximately $550.2 million at exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2006) in various development projects in Macao by June 2009. The Company has spent more than the required minimum amount.2006. In March 2006, the Company received an extension of the June and December 2006 construction deadlines for The Venetian Macao and the convention center to December 2007. The Company currently expects to open The Venetian Macao in mid-2007. If itthe Company fails to meet the December 2007 deadline and that deadline is not extended further, the Company could lose its right to continue to operate The Sands Macao or any other facilities developed under its Macao gaming subconcession and its investment to date in construction of The Venetian Macao could be lost. See Note 7 — Segment Information, for the total assets in Macao.

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~~(CONTINUED)~~— (Continued)

The Company commenced construction of The Venetian Macao prior to obtaining a land concession from the Macao government, which holds title to the land. The Company has applied to the Macao government for a land concession for a portion of the west side of the Cotai Strip^TMtm, including the site of The Venetian Macao. The land concession will require the Company to pay certain premiums and rent. The Company is currently in ~~negotiation~~negotiations with the Macao government over the cost of the land ~~concession. The Company~~concession and believes it will be successful in obtaining the land concession. ~~However,~~The Company expects to have the negotiations complete in the latter part of the third quarter or early part of the fourth quarter of 2006, at which point the Company will be required to pay the negotiated amount. The land premium will be amortized over an extended period of time. The initial term of the lease will be 25 years with unlimited10-year renewals at the Company’s option. The Company expects to use the funds from the new Macao credit facility (see Note 4) to make the portion of the land concession payments that will be due upon receipt of the provisional land grant and will finance the remaining portion through financing permitted by the Macao government and certain payment guarantees to be issued by commercial banks. Under the credit facility, the Company is required to secure the concession in order to fully draw against the facility. If the Company is unable to complete the negotiations within a specified period of time, it will not be able to draw any further funds from the Macao credit facility (see Note 4) in order to fund construction activities and it will have to seek additional financing. In the event the Company is unable to successfully conclude its negotiations with the Macao government with regard to the land underlying The Venetian Macao, the Company could lose all or a substantial part of its investment in the creation of the land and in constructing The Venetian Macao and would not be able to open and operate the facility as planned. See Note 7 — Segment Information, for the total assets in Macao.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~


	*Recent Accounting Pronouncements*

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Statement of Financial Standards (“SFAS”) No. ~~123(R),~~123R, “Share-Based Payment”, which supersedes Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”. This statement requires compensation costs related to stock-based payment transactions to be recognized in financial statements based on estimated fair values. This statement also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. ~~The provisions of this statement are effective as of the first annual reporting period that begins after January 1, 2006.~~ This statement requires ~~public~~companies entities to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). This cost ~~will be~~is being recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. This statement also addresses the accounting for the tax effects of stock-based compensation awards. The Company adopted this standard as of January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective application transition method. Under the modified prospective application transition method, the Company ~~will expense~~is expensing the cost of stock-based compensation awards issued after January 1, 2006 based on their fair values. Additionally, the Company ~~will recognize~~is recognizing compensation cost for the portion of awards outstanding on January 1, 2006, based on their previously calculated fair values, for which the requisite service has not been rendered as the requisite service is to be rendered on or after January 1, 2006. During the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, the Company recorded $2.9 million and $5.7 million respectively, of stock-based compensation expense. Previous periods have not been restated. See “Note 5 — Stock-Based Employee Compensation” for additional information.

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

benefit to ~~changes required by an accounting pronouncement if the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. This statement requires retrospective application~~be recognized for these purposes which are considered greater than 50% likely to ~~prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle. SFAS~~be sustained. FIN No. ~~154~~48 is effective for ~~accounting changes and corrections of errors made in~~ fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2005.~~2006. The ~~adoption on January 1, 2006~~Company is currently evaluating the impact of ~~SFAS No. 154 did not have a material effect~~this standard on the ~~Company’s~~condensed consolidated financial ~~position, results of operations or cash flows.~~statements.

NOTE 2 — STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND EARNINGS PER SHARE

Changes in stockholders’ equity for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 were as follows (in thousands):


Balance at December 31, 2005	$	1,609,538
Net income		231,112
Stock-based compensation		6,599
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		3,180
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options		632
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income		(914	)

Balance at June 30, 2006	$	1,850,147

Balance at December 31, 2005 $ 1,609,538
Net income 121,783
Stock-based compensation 3,299
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 1,864
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options 632
Change in accumulated other comprehensive income (288 )

Balance at March 31, 2006 $ 1,736,828

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)~~ At June 30, 2006, the accumulated other comprehensive income balance consisted solely of foreign currency translation adjustments. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, comprehensive income amounted to $108.7 million and $230.2 million, respectively.

The weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share consisted of the following:


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,

	2006		2005		2006		2005

Weighted-average common shares outstanding (used in the calculation of basic earnings per share)		354,255,635		354,160,692		354,227,600		354,160,692
Potential dilution from stock options and restricted stock		1,003,852		635,141		575,620		693,278

Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares (used in the calculations of diluted earnings per share)		355,259,487		354,795,833		354,803,220		354,853,970

Three Months Ended
March 31,
2006 2005
Weighted-average common shares outstanding (used in the calculation of basic earnings per share) 354,199,253 354,160,692
Potential dilution from stock options and restricted stock 393,344 869,276

Weighted-average common and common equivalent shares (used in the calculations of diluted earnings per share) 354,592,597 355,029,968

For the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, outstanding options to purchase ~~2,223,714~~432,500 shares and 2,057,894 shares of common stock, respectively, were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect was antidilutive. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, outstanding options to purchase 22,820 shares of common stock were not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because their effect was antidilutive.

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

NOTE 3 — PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):


	June 30,			December 31,
	2006			2005

Land and land improvements	$	201,896		$	202,285
Building and improvements		1,544,771			1,454,462
Equipment, furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements		370,615			351,219
Construction in progress		1,644,380			957,752

		3,761,662			2,965,718
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(414,332	)		(365,250	)

	$	3,347,330		$	2,600,468

March 31, December 31,
2006 2005
Land and land improvements $ 201,841 $ 202,285
Building and improvements 1,475,533 1,454,462
Equipment, furniture, fixtures and leasehold improvements 357,560 351,219
Construction in progress 1,242,459 957,752

3,277,393 2,965,718
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization (389,980 ) (365,250 )

$ 2,887,413 $ 2,600,468

During the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 and the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, the Company capitalized interest expense of ~~$8.3~~$20.9 million, $29.2 million, $5.0 million and ~~$4.1~~$9.1 million, respectively.

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)~~

NOTE 4 — LONG-TERM DEBT

Long-term debt consists of the following (in thousands):


	June 30,			December 31,
	2006			2005

Indebtedness of the Company and its Subsidiaries other than the Macao Subsidiaries:
Senior Secured Credit Facility — Term B and Term B delayed	$	1,170,000		$	1,170,000
Senior Secured Credit Facility — Revolving Facility		260,129			31,000
6.375% Senior Notes		248,039			247,925
The Sands Expo Center Mortgage Loan		92,794			95,601
Phase II Mall Construction Loan		58,500			28,500
FF&E Credit Facility and other		8,475			10,200
Indebtedness of the Macao Subsidiaries:
Macao Credit Facility — Term B		1,200,000			—
Macao Credit Facility — Local Term		100,000			—
Macao Credit Facility — Revolving Facility		25,000			—
Venetian Intermediate Credit Facility		—			50,000

		3,162,937			1,633,226
Less: current maturities		(6,138	)		(7,325	)

Total long-term debt	$	3,156,799		$	1,625,901

March 31, December 31,
2006 2005
Indebtedness of the Company and its Subsidiaries other than the Macao Subsidiaries:

Senior Secured Credit Facility — Term B $ 970,000 $ 970,000
Senior Secured Credit Facility — Term B delayed 200,000 200,000
Senior Secured Credit Facility — Revolving Facility 123,129 31,000
6.375% Senior Notes 247,982 247,925
Interface Mortgage Loan 94,650 95,601
Phase II Mall Construction Loan 42,500 28,500
FF&E Credit Facility and other 9,075 10,200

Indebtedness of the Macao Subsidiaries:

Venetian Intermediate Credit Facility — 50,000

1,687,336 1,633,226

Less: current maturities (7,490 ) (7,325 )

Total long-term debt $ 1,679,846 $ 1,625,901

On May 25, 2006, two subsidiaries of the Company, VML US Finance LLC (the “Borrower”) and Venetian Macau Limited, as guarantor, entered into a credit agreement (the “Macao Credit Facility”). The Macao Credit Facility consists of a $1.20 billion funded term B loan (the “Macao Term B Facility”), a $700.0 million delayed draw term B loan (the “Macao Term B Delayed Draw Facility”), a $100.0 million funded local currency term loan (the “Macao Local Term Facility”) and a $500.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Macao Revolving Facility”). As of June 30, 2006, $1.3 billion has been drawn under the Macao

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Term B Facility and Macao Local Term Facility and $25.0 million has been drawn under the Macao Revolving Facility. No amounts have been drawn under the Macao Term B Delayed Draw Facility as of June 30, 2006.

The indebtedness under the Macao Credit Facility is guaranteed by Venetian Macau Limited, Venetian Cotai Limited and certain of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries (the “Macao Guarantors”). The obligations under the Macao Credit Facility and the guarantees of the Macao Guarantors are secured by a first-priority security interest in substantially all of the Borrower’s and the Macao Guarantors’ assets, other than (1) capital stock of the Borrower and the Macao Guarantors, (2) assets securing permitted furniture, fixtures and equipment financings, (3) Venetian Macau Limited’s gaming subconcession contract and (4) certain other assets.

Borrowings under the Macao Credit Facility bear interest, at the Company’s option, at either an adjusted Eurodollar rate (or, in the case of the Macao Local Term Facility, adjusted HIBOR) or at an alternative base rate, plus a spread of 2.75% or 1.75%, respectively. These spreads will be decreased by 0.25% from the beginning of the first interest period following the substantial completion of The Venetian Macao.

The Macao Revolving Facility and the Macao Local Term Facility have a five year maturity. The Macao Term B Delayed Draw Facility and the Macao Term B Facility mature in six and seven years, respectively. The Macao Term B Delayed Draw Facility and the Macao Term B Facility are subject to nominal amortization for the first five and six years, respectively, with the remainder of the loans payable in four equal installments in the last year immediately preceding their respective maturity dates. Following the substantial completion of The Venetian Macao, the Macao Local Term Facility is subject to annual amortization in an amount of approximately $6.3 million per annum, with the remainder of the loan payable in four equal installments in the last year immediately preceding the maturity date.

The Macao Credit Facility contains affirmative and negative covenants customary for such financings, including, but not limited to, limitations on incurring additional liens, incurring additional indebtedness, making certain investments, paying dividends and other restricted payments, and acquiring and selling assets. The Macao Credit Facility also requires the Borrower and the Macao Guarantors to comply with financial covenants, including, but not limited to, minimum EBITDA for a period of time and, thereafter, ratios of EBITDA to interest expense and total indebtedness to EBITDA, as well as maximum capital expenditures. The Macao Credit Facility also contains events of default customary for such financings.

NOTE 5 — STOCK-BASED EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, which establishes accounting for equity instruments exchanged for employee services. Under the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the calculated fair value of the award, and is recognized over the employee’s requisite service period (generally the vesting period of the equity grant). Prior to January 1, 2006, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation to employees in accordance with APB No. 25 ~~“Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,”~~ and related interpretations. The Company also followed the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation”, as amended by SFAS 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based ~~Compensation—~~Compensation — Transition and Disclosure”. The Company elected to adopt the modified prospective application transition method as provided by SFAS No. 123R and, accordingly, financial statement amounts for the prior periods presented in this Form 10-Q have not been restated to reflect the fair value method of recording stock-based compensation.

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, the Company has two stock-based compensation plans. The board of directors has agreed not to grant any additional stock options under one of these plans and there were no options outstanding under it during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006. The second plan is described below. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the plans was $2.9 million for the three months

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, which is comprised of $2.6 million from stock options and $0.3 million from restricted stock. The compensation cost that has been charged against income for the plans was $5.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, which is comprised of $5.1 million from stock options and $0.6 million from restricted stock. The total income tax benefit recognized in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for stock-based compensation arrangements was $0.7 ~~million.~~million and $1.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively. Compensation cost associated with individuals responsible for construction activities was capitalized as part of property and equipment ~~was~~in the amount of $0.4 million and $0.9 million for the three and six months ended ~~March 31, 2006.~~June 30, 2006, respectively. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 was $0.01 and $0.02 lower, respectively, than if the Company had continued to account for stock-based compensation under APB No. 25.


	*Las Vegas Sands Corp. 2004 Equity Award Plan*

The purpose of the Company’s 2004 Equity Award Plan

~~The purpose of the 2004 Plan~~ (the “2004 Plan”) is to give the Company a competitive edge in attracting, retaining, and motivating employees, directors, officers and consultants and to provide the Company with a stock plan providing incentives directly related to increases in the value of its ~~stockholder value.~~common stock.

Administration.The Company’s compensation committee administers the 2004 Plan. Except in the case of awards to non-employee directors which are administered by the Company’s board of directors, the compensation committee has the authority to determine the terms and conditions of any agreements

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)~~

evidencing any awards granted under the 2004 Plan, and to adopt, alter and repeal rules, guidelines and practices relating to the 2004 Plan. The compensation committee has full discretion to administer and interpret the 2004 Plan, to adopt such rules, regulations, and procedures as it deems necessary or advisable and to determine, among other things, the time or times at which the awards may be exercised and whether and under what circumstances an award may be exercised. The compensation committee has formed a sub-committee to administer those portions of the 2004 Plan that require administration by directors meeting certain independence standards.

Eligibility.Any of the Company’s subsidiaries’ ~~or affiliates’ employees,~~, directors, officers or consultants are eligible for awards under the 2004 Plan. The compensation committee has the sole and complete authority to determine who will be granted an award under the 2004 Plan (except in the case of awards to non-employee directors, which are made by the board of directors).

Number of Shares Authorized.The 2004 Plan provides for an aggregate of 26,344,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to be available for awards. No participant may be granted awards of options, restricted stock and stock appreciation rights with respect to more than 3,000,000 shares of common stock in any one year. If any award is forfeited, or if any option terminates, expires, or lapses without being exercised, shares of the Company’s common stock subject to such award will again be available for future grant. If there is any change in the Company’s corporate capitalization, the compensation committee, in its sole discretion, may make substitutions or adjustments to the number of shares reserved for issuance under the 2004 Plan, the number of shares covered by awards then outstanding under the 2004 Plan, the limitations on awards under the 2004 Plan, the exercise price of outstanding options and such other equitable substitution or adjustments as it may determine appropriate.

The 2004 Plan has a term of ten years and no further awards may be granted after the expiration of the term.

Awards Available for Grant.The compensation committee may grant awards of nonqualified stock options, incentive (qualified) stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units, stock bonus awards, performance compensation awards or any combination of the foregoing. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, there were ~~22,035,097~~21,746,797 shares available for grant under the 2004 Plan.

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Stock option awards are granted with an exercise price equal to the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. The stock options generally vest based on four years of continuous service and have10-year contractual terms. Restricted stock awards generally vest over three years. Compensation cost for all stock option grants, which all have graded vesting, is net of estimated forfeitures and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the awards’ respective requisite service periods. The Company estimates the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatilities from a selection of companies from the Company’s peer group due to the Company’s lack of historical information. The Company used the simplified method for estimating expected option life, as the options qualify as “plain-vanilla” options. The risk-free interest rate for periods equal to the expected term of the stock option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant. The Company believes that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of the Company’s stock options granted during the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 and 2005.

The Company had previously adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, for disclosure purposes only. Had the Company accounted for the plan under the fair value method allowed by SFAS No. 123, the Company’s net income, and earnings per share would have been adjusted to the following pro forma amounts (dollars in thousands, except per share data):

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)~~

A summary of the status of the Company’s stock option plan is presented below:


						Weighted
				Weighted		Average
				Average		Remaining		Aggregate
				Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		Life (Years)		Value

Outstanding at January 1, 2006		2,097,960		$	29.83
Granted		2,616,794			47.47
Exercised		(107,715	)		30.32
Forfeited		(214,268	)		32.83

Outstanding at June 30, 2006		4,392,771		$	40.20		9.18	$	165,431,756

Exercisable at June 30, 2006		205,382		$	29.18		8.46	$	9,997,996

Weighted
Weighted Average
Average Remaining Aggregate
Exercise Contractual Intrinsic
Shares Price Life (Years) Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2006 2,097,960 29.83
Granted 2,184,294 43.72
Exercised (64,284 ) 29.00
Forfeited (65,609 ) 29.70

Outstanding at March 31, 2006 4,152,361 37.15 9.3 81,012,563

Exercisable at March 31, 2006 248,813 29.38 8.7 6,787,619

A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested restricted shares for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006:


				Weighted Average Grant
	Shares			Date Fair Value

Nonvested at January 1, 2006		8,088		$	37.09
Granted		77,829			44.00
Vested	��	(8,088	)		37.09
Forfeited		—			—

Nonvested at June 30, 2006		77,829		$	44.00

Weighted Average Grant
Shares Date Fair Value
Nonvested at January 1, 2006 8,088 $ 37.09
Granted 73,370 42.59
Vested — —
Forfeited — —

Nonvested at March 31, 2006 81,458 $ 42.04

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, there was ~~$44.9~~$48.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures of 8.0%, related to nonvested stock options and there was $2.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock. The stock option and restricted stock costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of ~~3.7~~3.6 years and ~~2.7~~2.4 years, respectively.

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

For the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, cash received from stock option exercises was ~~$1.9~~$1.3 million and $3.2 million, respectively, and the tax benefit realized for the tax deductions from those exercises totaled $0 and $0.6 ~~million.~~million, respectively. There were no stock option exercises for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005.

NOTE 6 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


	*Singapore Development*

In May 2006, the Company was selected by the Singapore government to build and operate an integrated resort called the Marina Bay Sands in Singapore, which will be a large integrated resort, including a casino. As a result of being selected to build the project, the Company is required to pay the Singapore government $1.20 billion Singapore dollars (approximately US$751.1 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2006) in premium payments for use of the land on which the resort will be built plus an additional $298.2 million Singapore dollars (approximately US$186.7 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2006) for various taxes and other fees. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had paid $300.0 million Singapore dollars (approximately US$187.8 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2006) related to the land premium payments. The ~~Palazzo Construction Litigation~~remaining amount due of approximately $1.20 billion Singapore dollars (approximately US$750.0 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2006) is due on August 24, 2006. The Company is currently in the process of obtaining bridge financing in the amount of $1.4 billion to cover the above payments as well as the initial development costs for the project.

At the time these remaining amounts are paid, the Company will enter into the development agreement, which will require the Company to construct and operate the Marina Bay Sands in accordance with the Company’s proposal for this integrated resort and in accordance with that agreement. Based on the proposal submitted by the Company to the Singapore government, the Company will develop and construct the Marina Bay Sands Resort for approximately $3.6 billion, inclusive of the land premium, taxes and other fees discussed above. Upon completion of the bridge financing, the Company will immediately focus its efforts on lining up long-term financing in an amount necessary to fund the construction of Marina Bay Sands.


	*The Palazzo Construction Litigation*

Lido Casino Resort, LLC (“Lido”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, ~~(“Lido”),~~ and its construction manager, Taylor International Corp. (“Taylor”), filed suit onin March ~~14,~~ 2006 in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada (the “District Court”) against Malcolm Drilling Company, Inc. (“Malcolm”), the contractor on The Palazzo project responsible for completing certain foundation work (the “District Court Case”). Lido and Taylor claim in the District Court Case that Malcolm was in default of its contract for performing defective work, failing to correct defective work, failing to complete its work and causing delay to the project. Malcolm responded by filing a Notice of a Lien with the Clerk of Clark County, onNevada in March ~~23,~~ 2006 in the amount of approximately $19.0 million (the “Lien”). OnIn April ~~11, 2006, as amended on April 26,~~ 2006, Lido and Taylor moved in the District Court Case to strike or, in the alternative, to reduce the amount of, the Lien, claiming, among other things, that the Lien was excessive asfor including claims for disruption and delay, which Lido and Taylor claim are not lienable under Nevada ~~law.~~law (the “Lien Motion”). Malcolm responded onin April ~~26,~~ 2006 by filing a complaint against Lido and Taylor in District Court inof Clark County, Nevada seeking to foreclose on the Lien against Taylor, claiming breach of contract, a cardinal change in the underlying contract, ~~and~~ unjust enrichment against Lido and Taylor and ~~claiming~~ bad faith and fraud against Taylor (the “State Court Case”)~~. Also on April 26, 2006, Malcolm~~, and simultaneously filed a motion in the District Court ~~case,~~Case, seeking

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)~~

to dismiss the District Court Case on abstention ~~grounds.~~grounds (the “Abstention Motion”). In response, in June 2006, Lido filed a motion to dismiss the State Court Case based on the principle of the “prior pending” District Court Case (the “Motion to Dismiss”). In June 2006, the Abstention Motion was granted in part by the United States District Court, the District Court Case was stayed pending the outcome of the Motion to Dismiss in the State Court Case and the Lien Motion was

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

denied without prejudice. Lido and Malcolm then entered into a stipulation under which Lido withdrew the Motion to Dismiss, and in July 2006 filed a replacement lien motion in the State Court Case. This matter is in the preliminary stages. Lido intends to defend itself against the claims pending in the State Court Case and to prosecute the District Court Case vigorously.

~~Litigation Relating to Macao Casino~~


	*Litigation Relating to Macao Casino*

The following disclosure summarizes our previous disclosure regarding this matter and discusses recent developments since the filing of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

On October 15, 2004, Richard Suen and Round Square Company Limited filed an action against Las Vegas Sands Corp., Las Vegas Sands Inc., Sheldon G. Adelson and William P. Weidner in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada, asserting a breach of an alleged agreement to pay a success fee of $5.0 million and 2.0% of the net profit from ~~our~~the Company’s Macao resort operations to the plaintiffs as well as other related claims. In March 2005, Las Vegas Sands Corp. was dismissed as a party without prejudice based on a stipulation to do so between the parties. On May 17, 2005, the plaintiffs filed their ~~First Amended Complaint.~~first amended complaint. On February 2, 2006, defendants filed a motion for partial summary judgment with respect to plaintiffs’ fraud claims against all the defendants. On March 16, 2006, an ~~Order~~order was filed by the ~~Court~~court granting defendants’ motion for partial summary judgment. Pursuant to the order filed March 16, 2006, ~~Order,~~ plaintiffs’ fraud claims set forth in the ~~First Amended Complaint~~first amended complaint were dismissed with prejudice as against all defendants. The ~~Order~~order also dismissed with prejudice the ~~First Amended Complaint~~first amended complaint against defendants Sheldon GG. Adelson and William P. Weidner. This action is in a preliminary stage and ~~our~~based upon the advice of legal counsel, management has ~~advised~~determined that based on proceedings to date, the probability of recovery by the plaintiffs is remote. We intend to defend this matter vigorously.

On January 26, 2006, Clive Basset Jones, Darryl Steven Turok a/(a/k/a Dax ~~Turok,~~Turok) and Cheong Jose Vai Chi a/(a/k/a Cliff ~~Cheong,~~Cheong), filed an action against Las Vegas Sands Corp., Las Vegas Sands, LLC, Venetian Venture Development, LLC and various unspecified individuals and companies in the District Court of Clark County, Nevada. The plaintiffs assert breach of an agreement to pay a success fee in an amount equal to 5% of the ownership interest in the entity that owns and operates the Macau SAR gaming ~~concession~~subconcession as well as other related claims. In April 2006, Las Vegas Sands Corp. was dismissed as a party without prejudice based on a stipulation to do so between the parties. Other than the complaint which has been filed, and our answer, there is currently no pending activity in the matter. This action is in a preliminary stage and ~~our~~based upon the advice of legal counsel, management has ~~advised~~determined that based on proceedings to date, the probability of recovery by the plaintiffs is remote. We intend to defend this matter vigorously.


	*Interface Nevada Litigation*

On October 17, 2003, Bear Stearns Funding, Inc. filed a lawsuit against our subsidiary, Interface Group-Nevada, Inc., the Company’s subsidiary that owns The Sands Expo Center. The plaintiff is seeking damages against Interface Group-Nevada for alleged breach of contract in the amount of approximately $1.5 million, plus interest and costs. The claim asserts that the amount is due as an agreed-upon additional fee in connection with Interface Group-Nevada’s prior $141.0 million mortgage loan, which was paid off in July 2004. Interface Group-Nevada has asserted six counter-claims against the plaintiff. The counterclaims against Bear Stearns allege that Bear Stearns’ sale of a subordinated component of the loan to a competitor constituted a breach of the loan agreement and a related agreement, that its transmission of information in connection with that sale constituted a misappropriation of Interface Group-Nevada’s trade secrets, and that it misrepresented to Interface Group-Nevada certain facts regarding the purchaser of the subordinated component. The counterclaims also allege that the Bear Stearns’ demand that Interface Group-Nevada purchase insurance not required by the loan agreement was motivated by Bear Stearns’ exclusion from participating in another financing, and that this action constituted a prima facie tort under New York law, and together with the other actions alleged in the counterclaims, constituted a breach of Bear Stearns’ duty of good faith and fair dealing. The counterclaims sought damages in an amount to be determined at trial but not less than $1.5 million, plus punitive damages of not less than $3.0 million on the fraud and prima facie tort causes

~~Other Litigation~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

of action. Plaintiff filed a motion for summary judgment on the complaint seeking (i) judgment on the complaint in the approximate amount of $1.5 million plus interest, costs and attorneys fees and (ii) dismissal of the counterclaims other than the two breach of contract counterclaims (the “Motion”). By Opinion and Order dated March 21, 2005, the Motion was denied in part and granted in part. The Court denied Bear Stearns’ motion for summary judgment on the complaint, granted Bear Stearns’ motion to dismiss the counterclaims alleging misappropriation of trade secrets, prima facie tort, and fraud, and granted the request to dismiss one of the two bases of the counterclaim alleging a breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing. This matter is now in the discovery phase. Pretrial discovery is largely complete and both Interface Group-Nevada and Bear Stearns have filed motions for summary judgment. The briefing on the motions is not yet complete. Interface Group-Nevada and its legal counsel are currently not able to determine the probability of the outcome of these matters.


	*Other Litigation*

The Company is involved in other litigation arising in the normal course of business. Management has made certain estimates for potential litigation costs based upon consultation with legal counsel. Actual results could differ from these estimates; however, in the opinion of management, such litigation and claims will not have a material effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

NOTE 7 — SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company reviews the results of operations based on the following geographic segments: (1) Las Vegas, which includes The Venetian, The Sands Expo and The Palazzo (currently under construction), and (2) Macao, which includes The Sands Macao, The Venetian Macao (currently under construction) and other development projects. Effective April 1, 2006, the Company changed its segments based upon changes in the information used by the chief operating decision maker to include The Sands Expo Center within the Las Vegas segment. The information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 has been reclassified to conform to the current presentation. The Company’s segment information is as follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,

	2006		2005		2006		2005

Net Revenues
Las Vegas	$	206,575	$	193,748	$	455,302	$	422,486
Macao		310,432		205,073		592,069		380,129

Total net revenues	$	517,007	$	398,821	$	1,047,371	$	802,615

Adjusted EBITDAR
Las Vegas	$	62,234	$	70,439	$	162,374	$	168,860
Macao		116,334		81,011		219,208		148,816

		178,568		151,450		381,582		317,676

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~~(CONTINUED)~~— (Continued)

~~NOTE 7 — SEGMENT INFORMATION~~

The Company reviews the results of operations based on the following distinct segments, which are The Venetian on the Strip, The Sands Expo Center in Las Vegas, and The Sands Macao in Macao. The Company’s segments are based on geographic locations (Las Vegas and Macao) or on the type of business (casino resort operations or convention operations). The Company’s segment information is as follows for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 (in thousands):

Three Months Ended March 31,
2006 2005
Net Revenues

The Venetian $ 226,640 $ 209,905
The Sands Macao 281,637 175,056
The Sands Expo Center 22,087 18,833

Total net revenues $ 530,364 $ 403,794

Adjusted EBITDA⁽¹⁾

The Venetian $ 87,704 $ 87,206
The Sands Macao 102,686 67,602
The Sands Expo Center 8,917 7,713

Total segment adjusted EBITDA 199,307 162,521

Other Operating Costs and Expenses

Corporate expense (12,954 ) (10,882 )
Depreciation and amortization (25,005 ) (19,965 )
Loss on disposal of assets (1,081 ) (1,163 )
Pre-opening expense (2,219 ) —
Development expense (9,168 ) (5,175 )

Operating income 148,880 125,336

Other Non-Operating Costs and Expenses

Interest income 10,214 7,394
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized (21,415 ) (27,083 )
Other income 164 —
Loss on early retirement of debt — (132,834 )
Benefit (provision) for income taxes (16,060 ) 34,299

Net income $ 121,783 $ 7,112


~~(1)~~		Adjusted EBITDA is earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization, pre-opening expense, development expense, other income, loss on disposal of assets, loss on early retirement of debt, and corporate expense. Adjusted EBITDA is used by management as the primary measure of operating performance of the Company’s properties and to compare the operating performance of the Company’s properties with those of its competitors.


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,

	2006			2005			2006			2005

Other Operating Costs and Expenses
Corporate expense		(12,251	)		(6,620	)		(25,205	)		(17,502	)
Rental expense		(3,803	)		(3,682	)		(7,510	)		(7,387	)
Depreciation and amortization		(24,428	)		(21,097	)		(49,433	)		(41,062	)
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets		(456	)		158			(1,537	)		(1,005	)
Pre-opening expense		(4,354	)		(504	)		(6,573	)		(504	)
Development expense		(7,861	)		(5,562	)		(17,029	)		(10,737	)

Operating income		125,415			114,143			274,295			239,479
Other Non-Operating Costs and Expenses
Interest income		15,018			7,133			25,232			14,527
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized		(23,685	)		(17,969	)		(45,100	)		(45,052	)
Other income (expense)		(14	)		(1,291	)		150			(1,291	)
Loss on early retirement of debt		—			(4,166	)		—			(137,000	)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		(7,405	)		(11,421	)		(23,465	)		22,878

Net income	$	109,329		$	86,429		$	231,112		$	93,541


			Six Months Ended
			June 30,

			2006		2005

Capital Expenditures
Las Vegas:
	The Venetian		$	58,720	$	53,066
	The Palazzo			203,703		172,188
Macao:
	The Sands Macao			41,192		29,835
	The Venetian Macao			406,839		118,476
	Other Development Projects			20,021		—

		Total capital expenditures	$	730,475	$	373,565

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~~(CONTINUED)~~— (Continued)

Three Months Ended March 31,
2006 2005
Capital Expenditures

The Venetian $ 22,394 $ 25,890
Macao Projects 196,034 48,614
The Palazzo 75,453 77,495
The Sands Expo Center 352 165

Total capital expenditures $ 294,233 $ 152,164

March 31, December 31,
2006 2005
Total Assets

Las Vegas Sands Corp $ 158,904 $ 307,679
The Venetian 2,051,958 2,004,427
Macao Projects 1,114,170 885,809
The Palazzo 690,841 605,320
The Sands Expo Center 81,461 76,504

Total consolidated assets $ 4,097,334 $ 3,879,739


			June 30,		December 31,
			2006		2005

Total Assets
Las Vegas Sands Corp.			$	139,159	$	307,679
Las Vegas:
	The Venetian			2,118,504		2,080,931
	The Palazzo			813,446		605,320
Macao:
	The Sands Macao			473,899		425,597
	The Venetian Macao			1,945,745		459,333
	Other Development Projects			250,088		879

		Total consolidated assets	$	5,740,841	$	3,879,739

NOTE 8 — CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING FINANCIAL INFORMATION

In accordance with Rule 3-10 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission, condensed consolidating financial information of the Company, the Guarantor Subsidiaries (as defined below) and the non-guarantor subsidiaries on a combined basis as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, and for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 and 2005, is as follows (in thousands).

LVSC is the obligor ofunder the 6.375% Senior ~~Notes.~~Notes issued by LVSC on February 10, 2005. LVSLLC, Venetian Casino Resort, LLC, Mall Intermediate Holding Company, LLC, Venetian Venture Development, LLC, Venetian Transport, LLC, Venetian Marketing, Inc., ~~Venetian Operating Company, LLC,~~ Lido Intermediate Holding Company, LLC and Lido Casino Resort, LLC (collectively, the “Guarantor Subsidiaries”) have jointly and severally guaranteed the 6.375% Senior Notes on a full and unconditional basis.

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. ~~AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

~~Note 8~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — ~~Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (continued)~~(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS
~~March 31,~~

June 30, 2006

Non- Consolidating/
Las Vegas Guarantor Guarantor Eliminating
Sands Corp. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Total

Cash and cash equivalents $ 72,053 $ 86,556 $ 158,668 $ — $ 317,277
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 50,521 — 62,700 — 113,221
Intercompany receivable 86,030 62,947 3,305 (152,282 ) —
Accounts receivable, net 138 103,465 4,847 — 108,450
Notes receivable 188,219 — — (188,219 ) —
Inventories — 8,895 1,750 — 10,645
Deferred income taxes 57 10,392 — (86 ) 10,363
Prepaid expenses 1,799 7,324 9,052 — 18,175

Total current assets 398,817 279,579 240,322 (340,587 ) 578,131

Property and equipment, net 37,990 1,814,384 1,035,039 — 2,887,413
Investment in subsidiaries 1,567,849 577,602 — (2,145,451 ) —
Deferred offering costs, net 1,285 25,166 2,505 — 28,956
Restricted cash and cash equivalents — 577,425 — — 577,425
Deferred income taxes — 4,248 2,834 (5,018 ) 2,064
Other assets, net 79 14,849 8,417 — 23,345

Total assets $ 2,006,020 $ 3,293,253 $ 1,289,117 $ (2,491,056 ) $ 4,097,334

Accounts payable $ 38 $ 22,722 $ 21,499 $ — $ 44,259
Construction payables — 59,480 123,270 — 182,750
Intercompany payables 496 45,742 106,044 (152,282 ) —
Accrued interest payable 1,992 711 574 — 3,277
Other accrued liabilities 3,463 116,164 130,326 — 249,953
Income taxes payable 8,200 — — — 8,200
Deferred income taxes — — 86 (86 ) —
Notes payable — — 188,219 (188,219 ) —
Current maturities of long-term debt — 2,400 5,090 — 7,490

Total current liabilities 14,189 247,219 575,108 (340,587 ) 495,929

Other long-term liabilities 2,003 178,456 4,272 — 184,731
Deferred income taxes 5,018 — — (5,018 ) —
Long-term debt 247,982 1,299,729 132,135 — 1,679,846

269,192 1,725,404 711,515 (345,605 ) 2,360,506

Stockholders’ equity 1,736,828 1,567,849 577,602 (2,145,451 ) 1,736,828

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 2,006,020 $ 3,293,253 $ 1,289,117 $ (2,491,056 ) $ 4,097,334


						Non-		Consolidating/
		Las Vegas		Guarantor		Guarantor		Eliminating
		Sands Corp.		Subsidiaries		Subsidiaries		Entries			Total

Cash and cash equivalents		$	19,236	$	77,678	$	185,085	$	—		$	281,999
Restricted cash			50,842		56,575		232,786		—			340,203
Intercompany receivable			214,128		10,353		—		(224,481	)		—
Accounts receivable, net			146		81,934		4,859		—			86,939
Inventories			—		8,968		1,852		—			10,820
Deferred income taxes			68		12,172		—		(117	)		12,123
Prepaid income taxes			16,800		—		—		—			16,800
Prepaid expenses and other			6,622		8,258		13,584		—			28,464

	Total current assets		307,842		255,938		438,166		(224,598	)		777,348
Property and equipment, net			44,087		1,937,840		1,365,403		—			3,347,330
Investment in subsidiaries			1,692,543		687,562		—		(2,380,105	)		—
Deferred financing costs, net			1,249		23,888		42,372		—			67,509
Restricted cash			—		527,697		809,084		—			1,336,781
Deferred income taxes			—		667		2,751		(3,418	)		—
Intercompany notes receivable			72,899		50,851		—		(123,750	)		—
Other assets, net			79		13,550		198,244		—			211,873

Total assets		$	2,118,699	$	3,497,993	$	2,856,020	$	(2,731,871	)	$	5,740,841

Accounts payable		$	139	$	23,936	$	21,608	$	—		$	45,683
Construction payables			—		56,575		175,127		—			231,702
Intercompany payables			—		—		224,481		(224,481	)		—
Accrued interest payable			5,977		430		910		—			7,317
Other accrued liabilities			4,873		108,782		140,863		—			254,518
Deferred income taxes			—		—		117		(117	)		—
Current maturities of long-term debt			—		1,800		4,338		—			6,138

	Total current liabilities		10,989		191,523		567,444		(224,598	)		545,358
Other long-term liabilities			2,329		177,198		5,233		—			184,760
Deferred income taxes			7,195		—		—		(3,418	)		3,777
Intercompany notes payable			—		—		123,750		(123,750	)		—
Long-term debt			248,039		1,436,729		1,472,031		—			3,156,799

Total liabilities			268,552		1,805,450		2,168,458		(351,766	)		3,890,694

Stockholders’ equity			1,850,147		1,692,543		687,562		(2,380,105	)		1,850,147

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	2,118,699	$	3,497,993	$	2,856,020	$	(2,731,871	)	$	5,740,841

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. ~~AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

~~Note 8~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — ~~Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (continued)~~(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEETS

December 31, 2005

Non- Consolidating/
Las Vegas Guarantor Guarantor Eliminating
Sands Corp. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Total

Cash and cash equivalents $ 202,196 $ 87,173 $ 167,477 $ — $ 456,846
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 50,052 3 21,662 — 71,717
Intercompany receivable 2,207 3,373 4,195 (9,775 ) —
Accounts receivable, net 245 81,204 3,329 — 84,778
Notes receivable 121,784 — — (121,784 ) —
Inventories — 8,584 1,383 — 9,967
Deferred income taxes 11,748 (2,871 ) (931 ) — 7,946
Prepaid expenses 436 6,141 6,875 — 13,452

Total current assets 388,668 183,607 203,990 (131,559 ) 644,706

Property and equipment, net 38,471 1,744,352 817,645 — 2,600,468
Investment in subsidiaries 1,441,500 480,619 — (1,922,119 ) —
Deferred offering costs, net 1,322 26,442 3,209 — 30,973
Restricted cash and cash equivalents — 571,143 — — 571,143
Deferred income taxes 3,130 5,852 2,350 — 11,332
Other assets, net 79 12,485 8,553 — 21,117

Total assets $ 1,873,170 $ 3,024,500 $ 1,035,747 $ (2,053,678 ) $ 3,879,739

Accounts payable $ 50 $ 20,614 $ 14,139 $ — $ 34,803
Construction payables — 54,234 109,698 — 163,932
Intercompany payables — — 9,775 (9,775 ) —
Accrued interest payable 5,977 1,157 784 — 7,918
Other accrued liabilities 8,053 116,029 122,308 — 246,390
Notes payable — — 121,784 (121,784 ) —
Current maturities of long-term debt — 2,400 4,925 — 7,325

Total current liabilities 14,080 194,434 383,413 (131,559 ) 460,368

Other long-term liabilities 1,627 179,766 2,539 — 183,932
Long-term debt 247,925 1,208,800 169,176 — 1,625,901

263,632 1,583,000 555,128 (131,559 ) 2,270,201

Stockholders’ equity 1,609,538 1,441,500 480,619 (1,922,119 ) 1,609,538

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 1,873,170 $ 3,024,500 $ 1,035,747 $ (2,053,678 ) $ 3,879,739


							Non-			Consolidating/
		Las Vegas		Guarantor			Guarantor			Eliminating
		Sands Corp.		Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Entries			Total

Cash and cash equivalents		$	202,196	$	87,173		$	167,477		$	—		$	456,846
Restricted cash			50,052		3			21,662			—			71,717
Intercompany receivable			2,207		3,373			4,195			(9,775	)		—
Accounts receivable, net			245		81,204			3,329			—			84,778
Intercompany notes receivable			121,784		—			—			(121,784	)		—
Inventories			—		8,584			1,383			—			9,967
Deferred income taxes			11,748		(2,871	)		(931	)		—			7,946
Prepaid expenses and other			436		6,141			6,875			—			13,452

	Total current assets		388,668		183,607			203,990			(131,559	)		644,706
Property and equipment, net			38,471		1,744,352			817,645			—			2,600,468
Investment in subsidiaries			1,441,500		480,619			—			(1,922,119	)		—
Deferred financing costs, net			1,322		26,442			3,209			—			30,973
Restricted cash			—		571,143			—			—			571,143
Deferred income taxes			3,130		5,852			2,350			—			11,332
Other assets, net			79		12,485			8,553			—			21,117

Total assets		$	1,873,170	$	3,024,500		$	1,035,747		$	(2,053,678	)	$	3,879,739

Accounts payable		$	50	$	20,614		$	14,139		$	—		$	34,803
Construction payables			—		54,234			109,698			—			163,932
Intercompany payables			—		—			9,775			(9,775	)		—
Accrued interest payable			5,977		1,157			784			—			7,918
Other accrued liabilities			8,053		116,029			122,308			—			246,390
Intercompany notes payable			—		—			121,784			(121,784	)		—
Current maturities of long-term debt			—		2,400			4,925			—			7,325

	Total current liabilities		14,080		194,434			383,413			(131,559	)		460,368
Other long-term liabilities			1,627		179,766			2,539			—			183,932
Long-term debt			247,925		1,208,800			169,176			—			1,625,901

Total liabilities			263,632		1,583,000			555,128			(131,559	)		2,270,201

Stockholders’ equity			1,609,538		1,441,500			480,619			(1,922,119	)		1,609,538

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	1,873,170	$	3,024,500		$	1,035,747		$	(2,053,678	)	$	3,879,739

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. ~~AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

~~Note 8~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — ~~Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (continued)~~(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006

Non- Consolidating/
Las Vegas Guarantor Guarantor Eliminating
Sands Corp. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Total

Revenues:
Casino $ — $ 97,136 $ 278,246 $ — $ 375,382
Rooms — 89,569 1,569 — 91,138
Food and beverage — 41,946 11,088 (1,218 ) 51,816
Convention, retail and other 6,597 12,347 23,061 (7,000 ) 35,005

Total revenues 6,597 240,998 313,964 (8,218 ) 553,341
Less-promotional allowances (190 ) (15,278 ) (7,509 ) — (22,977 )

Net revenues 6,407 225,720 306,455 (8,218 ) 530,364

Operating expenses:
Casino — 46,053 159,291 — 205,344
Rooms — 21,715 38 — 21,753
Food and beverage — 18,176 5,946 (65 ) 24,057
Convention, retail and other — 7,756 10,195 (1,556 ) 16,395
Provision for doubtful accounts — 4,739 250 — 4,989
General and administrative — 41,981 19,428 (6,597 ) 54,812
Corporate expense 12,825 — 129 — 12,954
Rental expense — 3,316 391 — 3,707
Pre-opening expense — 256 1,963 — 2,219
Development expense 340 — 8,828 — 9,168
Depreciation and amortization 516 15,942 8,547 — 25,005
Loss on disposal of assets — 12 1,069 — 1,081

13,681 159,946 216,075 (8,218 ) 381,484

Operating income (loss) (7,274 ) 65,774 90,380 — 148,880

Other income (expense):
Interest income 3,696 7,084 985 (1,551 ) 10,214
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized (445 ) (16,695 ) (5,826 ) 1,551 (21,415 )
Other income — 156 8 — 164
Income from equity investment in subsidiaries 120,852 84,574 — (205,426 ) —

Income before income taxes 116,829 140,893 85,547 (205,426 ) 137,843

Benefit (provision) for income taxes 4,954 (20,041 ) (973 ) — (16,060 )

Net income $ 121,783 $ 120,852 $ 84,574 $ (205,426 ) $ 121,783


								Non-			Consolidating/
		Las Vegas			Guarantor			Guarantor			Eliminating
		Sands Corp.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Entries			Total

Revenues:
	Casino	$	—		$	71,322		$	307,140		$	—		$	378,462
	Rooms		—			88,014			1,640			—			89,654
	Food and beverage		—			33,261			11,864			(1,102	)		44,023
	Convention, retail and other		7,489			13,390			16,805			(8,408	)		29,276

	Total revenues		7,489			205,987			337,449			(9,510	)		541,415
Less-promotional allowances			(166	)		(16,152	)		(8,090	)		—			(24,408	)

	Net revenues		7,323			189,835			329,359			(9,510	)		517,007

Operating expenses:
	Casino		—			43,485			173,877			(118	)		217,244
	Rooms		—			21,939			57			—			21,996
	Food and beverage		—			17,249			6,264			(700	)		22,813
	Convention, retail and other		—			8,863			8,028			(1,163	)		15,728
	Provision for doubtful accounts		—			3,542			(221	)		—			3,321
	General and administrative		—			43,084			21,782			(7,529	)		57,337
	Corporate expense		12,215			15			21			—			12,251
	Rental expense		—			3,545			258			—			3,803
	Pre-opening expense		—			171			4,183			—			4,354
	Development expense		777			38			7,046			—			7,861
	Depreciation and amortization		531			15,006			8,891			—			24,428
	Loss on disposal of assets		—			—			456			—			456

			13,523			156,937			230,642			(9,510	)		391,592

Operating income (loss)			(6,200	)		32,898			98,717			—			125,415
Other income (expense):
	Interest income		2,978			8,704			6,068			(2,732	)		15,018
	Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized		(8,031	)		(16,637	)		(1,749	)		2,732			(23,685	)
	Other income (expense)		(7	)		(15	)		8			—			(14	)
	Income from equity investment in subsidiaries		119,725			103,675			—			(223,400	)		—

Income before income taxes			108,465			128,625			103,044			(223,400	)		116,734
	Benefit (provision) for income taxes		864			(8,900	)		631			—			(7,405	)

Net income		$	109,329		$	119,725		$	103,675		$	(223,400	)	$	109,329

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. ~~AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

~~Note 8~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — ~~Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (continued)~~(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005

Non- Consolidating/
Las Vegas Guarantor Guarantor Eliminating
Sands Corp. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Total
Revenues:
Casino $ — $ 94,748 $ 171,038 $ — $ 265,786
Rooms — 85,429 648 — 86,077
Food and beverage — 36,201 8,237 (949 ) 43,489
Convention, retail and other 3,087 5,374 21,071 (1,078 ) 28,454

Total revenues 3,087 221,752 200,994 (2,027 ) 423,806
Less-promotional allowances (224 ) (13,799 ) (5,989 ) — (20,012 )

Net revenues 2,863 207,953 195,005 (2,027 ) 403,794

Operating expenses:
Casino — 40,909 91,044 — 131,953
Rooms — 21,069 46 — 21,115
Food and beverage — 17,156 3,850 (41 ) 20,965
Convention, retail and other — 6,617 9,145 (1,386 ) 14,376
Provision for doubtful accounts — 3,386 — — 3,386
General and administrative — 31,265 15,108 (600 ) 45,773
Corporate expense 10,792 — 90 — 10,882
Rental expense — 3,299 406 — 3,705
Pre-opening expense — — — — —
Development expense — 1,807 3,368 — 5,175
Depreciation and amortization — 12,940 7,025 — 19,965
Loss on disposal of assets — 1,163 — — 1,163

10,792 139,611 130,082 (2,027 ) 278,458

Operating income (loss) (7,929 ) 68,342 64,923 — 125,336

Other income (expense):
Interest income 2,823 4,363 1,769 (1,561 ) 7,394
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized (2,212 ) (20,215 ) (6,217 ) 1,561 (27,083 )
Loss on early retirement of debt — (132,834 ) — — (132,834 )
Income from equity investment in subsidiaries 4,260 58,973 — (63,233 ) —

Income (loss) before income taxes (3,058 ) (21,371 ) 60,475 (63,233 ) (27,187 )

Benefit (provision) for income taxes 10,170 25,631 (1,502 ) — 34,299

Net income $ 7,112 $ 4,260 $ 58,973 $ (63,233 ) $ 7,112


								Non-			Consolidating/
		Las Vegas			Guarantor			Guarantor			Eliminating
		Sands Corp.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Entries			Total

Revenues:
	Casino	$	—		$	73,719		$	201,089		$	—		$	274,808
	Rooms		—			82,981			1,002			—			83,983
	Food and beverage		—			28,574			6,853			(729	)		34,698
	Convention, retail and other		3,554			5,997			15,618			(815	)		24,354

	Total revenues		3,554			191,271			224,562			(1,544	)		417,843
Less-promotional allowances			(287	)		(13,448	)		(5,287	)		—			(19,022	)

	Net revenues		3,267			177,823			219,275			(1,544	)		398,821

Operating expenses:
	Casino		—			38,711			107,835			—			146,546
	Rooms		—			20,116			111			—			20,227
	Food and beverage		—			14,649			3,285			(55	)		17,879
	Convention, retail and other		—			7,112			7,500			(889	)		13,723
	Provision for doubtful accounts		—			659			123			—			782
	General and administrative		—			33,417			15,397			(600	)		48,214
	Corporate expense		6,619			—			1			—			6,620
	Rental expense		—			3,308			374			—			3,682
	Pre-opening expense		—			504			—			—			504
	Development expense		147			2,283			3,132			—			5,562
	Depreciation and amortization		—			13,850			7,247			—			21,097
	(Gain) loss on disposal of assets		—			(165	)		7			—			(158	)

			6,766			134,444			145,012			(1,544	)		284,678

Operating income (loss)			(3,499	)		43,379			74,263			—			114,143
Other income (expense):
	Interest income		2,766			4,110			2,281			(2,024	)		7,133
	Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized		(4,073	)		(10,507	)		(5,413	)		2,024			(17,969	)
	Other expense		—			(1,220	)		(71	)		—			(1,291	)
	Loss on early retirement of debt		—			—			(4,166	)		—			(4,166	)
	Income from equity investment in subsidiaries		89,999			66,859			—			(156,858	)		—

Income before income taxes			85,193			102,621			66,894			(156,858	)		97,850
	Benefit (provision) for income taxes		1,236			(12,622	)		(35	)		—			(11,421	)

Net income		$	86,429		$	89,999		$	66,859		$	(156,858	)	$	86,429

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. ~~AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

~~Note 8~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — ~~Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (continued)~~(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the six months ended June 30, 2006


								Non-			Consolidating/
		Las Vegas			Guarantor			Guarantor			Eliminating
		Sands Corp.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Entries			Total

Revenues:
	Casino	$	—		$	168,458		$	585,386		$	—		$	753,844
	Rooms		—			177,583			3,209			—			180,792
	Food and beverage		—			75,207			22,952			(2,320	)		95,839
	Convention, retail and other		14,086			25,737			39,866			(15,408	)		64,281

	Total revenues		14,086			446,985			651,413			(17,728	)		1,094,756
Less-promotional allowances			(356	)		(31,430	)		(15,599	)		—			(47,385	)

	Net revenues		13,730			415,555			635,814			(17,728	)		1,047,371

Operating expenses:
	Casino		—			89,538			333,166			(118	)		422,586
	Rooms		—			43,654			94			—			43,748
	Food and beverage		—			35,425			12,211			(765	)		46,871
	Convention, retail and other		—			16,619			18,222			(2,719	)		32,122
	Provision for doubtful accounts		—			8,281			29			—			8,310
	General and administrative		—			85,065			41,213			(14,126	)		112,152
	Corporate expense		25,040			15			150			—			25,205
	Rental expense		—			6,861			649			—			7,510
	Pre-opening expense		—			427			6,146			—			6,573
	Development expense		1,117			38			15,874			—			17,029
	Depreciation and amortization		1,047			30,948			17,438			—			49,433
	Loss on disposal of assets		—			12			1,525			—			1,537

			27,204			316,883			446,717			(17,728	)		773,076

Operating income (loss)			(13,474	)		98,672			189,097			—			274,295
Other income (expense):
	Interest income		6,674			15,788			7,053			(4,283	)		25,232
	Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized		(8,476	)		(33,332	)		(7,575	)		4,283			(45,100	)
	Other income (expense)		(7	)		141			16			—			150
	Income from equity investment in subsidiaries		240,577			188,249			—			(428,826	)		—

Income before income taxes			225,294			269,518			188,591			(428,826	)		254,577
	Benefit (provision) for income taxes		5,818			(28,941	)		(342	)		—			(23,465	)

Net income		$	231,112		$	240,577		$	188,249		$	(428,826	)	$	231,112

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the six months ended June 30, 2005


								Non-			Consolidating/
		Las Vegas			Guarantor			Guarantor			Eliminating
		Sands Corp.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Entries			Total

Revenues:
	Casino	$	—		$	168,467		$	372,127		$	—		$	540,594
	Rooms		—			168,410			1,650			—			170,060
	Food and beverage		—			64,775			15,090			(1,678	)		78,187
	Convention, retail and other		6,641			11,371			36,689			(1,893	)		52,808

	Total revenues		6,641			413,023			425,556			(3,571	)		841,649
Less-promotional allowances			(511	)		(27,247	)		(11,276	)		—			(39,034	)

	Net revenues		6,130			385,776			414,280			(3,571	)		802,615

Operating expenses:
	Casino		—			79,620			198,879			—			278,499
	Rooms		—			41,185			157			—			41,342
	Food and beverage		—			31,805			7,135			(96	)		38,844
	Convention, retail and other		—			13,729			16,645			(2,275	)		28,099
	Provision for doubtful accounts		—			4,045			123			—			4,168
	General and administrative		—			64,682			30,505			(1,200	)		93,987
	Corporate expense		17,411			—			91			—			17,502
	Rental expense		—			6,607			780			—			7,387
	Pre-opening expense		—			504			—			—			504
	Development expense		147			4,090			6,500			—			10,737
	Depreciation and amortization		—			26,790			14,272			—			41,062
	Loss on disposal of assets		—			998			7			—			1,005

			17,558			274,055			275,094			(3,571	)		563,136

Operating income (loss)			(11,428	)		111,721			139,186			—			239,479
Other income (expense):
	Interest income		5,589			8,473			4,050			(3,585	)		14,527
	Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized		(6,285	)		(30,722	)		(11,630	)		3,585			(45,052	)
	Other expense		—			(1,220	)		(71	)		—			(1,291	)
	Loss on early retirement of debt		—	��		(132,834	)		(4,166	)		—			(137,000	)
	Income from equity investment in subsidiaries		94,259			125,831			—			(220,090	)		—

Income before income taxes			82,135			81,249			127,369			(220,090	)		70,663
	Benefit (provision) for income taxes		11,406			13,010			(1,538	)		—			22,878

Net income		$	93,541		$	94,259		$	125,831		$	(220,090	)	$	93,541

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006

Non- Consolidating/
Las Vegas Guarantor Guarantor Eliminating
Sands Corp. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Total

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ (19,426 ) $ 55,386 $ 109,866 $ — $ 145,826

Cash flows from investing activities:
Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents (469 ) (6,279 ) (41,038 ) — (47,786 )
Capital expenditures (35 ) (84,818 ) (209,380 ) — (294,233 )
Notes receivable to subsidiaries (66,435 ) — — 66,435 —
Intercompany receivables to subsidiaries (39,818 ) (56,460 ) — 96,278 —
Capital contributions to subsidiaries (6,456 ) (8,649 ) — 15,105 —

Net cash used in investing activities (113,213 ) (156,206 ) (250,418 ) 177,818 (342,019 )

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from exercise of stock options 1,864 — — — 1,864
Tax benefit from stock option exercises 632 — — — 632
Capital contributions received — 6,456 8,649 (15,105 ) —
Borrowings from Las Vegas Sands Corp. — — 66,435 (66,435 ) —
Proceeds from senior secured credit facility-revolver — 92,129 — — 92,129
Proceeds from Phase II mall construction loan — — 14,000 — 14,000
Proceeds from other long-term debt — — 75 — 75
Repayments on Venetian Intermediate credit facility — — (50,000 ) — (50,000 )
Repayments on FF&E credit facility — (1,200 ) — — (1,200 )
Repayments on Interface mortgage note payable — — (951 ) — (951 )
Increase in intercompany payables — 2,818 93,460 (96,278 ) —

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 2,496 100,203 131,668 (177,818 ) 56,549

Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash — — 75 — 75

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents (130,143 ) (617 ) (8,809 ) — (139,569 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 202,196 87,173 167,477 — 456,846

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 72,053 $ 86,556 $ 158,668 $ — $ 317,277


								Non-			Consolidating/
		Las Vegas			Guarantor			Guarantor			Eliminating
		Sands Corp.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Entries			Total

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		$	(36,402	)	$	79,446		$	57,654		$	(3,517	)	$	97,181

Cash flows from investing activities:
	Change in restricted cash		(790	)		(13,126	)		(1,020,965	)		—			(1,034,881	)
	Capital expenditures		(6,663	)		(226,057	)		(497,755	)		—			(730,475	)
	Notes receivable to non-guarantor subsidiaries		(115,000	)		(75,000	)		—			190,000			—
	Repayment of notes receivable from non- guarantor subsidiaries		165,000			25,000			—			(190,000	)		—
	Intercompany receivable to Las Vegas Sands Corp.		—			(20,000	)		—			20,000			—
	Intercompany receivables to subsidiaries		(200,930	)		(3,517	)		—			204,447			—
	Capital contributions to subsidiaries		(11,987	)		(15,557	)		—			27,544			—

Net cash used in investing activities			(170,370	)		(328,257	)		(1,518,720	)		251,991			(1,765,356	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
	Proceeds from exercise of stock options		3,180			—			—			—			3,180
	Tax benefit from stock option exercises		632			—			—			—			632
	Capital contributions received		—			11,987			15,557			(27,544	)		—
	Borrowings from Las Vegas Sands Corp.		—			—			115,000			(115,000	)		—
	Borrowings from Guarantor Subsidiaries		20,000			—			75,000			(95,000	)		—
	Repayment on borrowings from Las Vegas Sands Corp.		—			—			(165,000	)		165,000			—
	Repayment on borrowings from Guarantor Subsidiaries		—			—			(25,000	)		25,000			—
	Proceeds from Macao credit facility		—			—			1,325,000			—			1,325,000
	Proceeds from senior secured credit facility-revolver		—			254,129			—			—			254,129
	Proceeds from phase II mall construction loan		—			—			30,000			—			30,000
	Proceeds from other long-term debt		—			—			75			—			75
	Repayments on Venetian Intermediate credit facility		—			—			(50,000	)		—			(50,000	)
	Repayment on senior secured credit facility-revolver		—			(25,000	)		—			—			(25,000	)
	Repayments on FF&E credit facility		—			(1,800	)		—			—			(1,800	)
	Repayments on Interface mortgage note payable		—			—			(2,807	)		—			(2,807	)
	Payments of deferred financing costs		—			—			(41,056	)		—			(41,056	)
	Increase in Intercompany payable		—			—			200,930			(200,930	)		—

Net cash provided by financing activities			23,812			239,316			1,477,699			(248,474	)		1,492,353

Effect of foreign exchange rate on cash			—			—			975			—			975

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents			(182,960	)		(9,495	)		17,608			—			(174,847	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			202,196			87,173			167,477			—			456,846

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	19,236		$	77,678		$	185,085		$	—		$	281,999

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP. ~~AND SUBSIDIARIES~~
~~Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)~~

~~Note 8~~NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — ~~Condensed Consolidating Financial Information (continued)~~(Continued)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005

Non- Consolidating/
Las Vegas Guarantor Guarantor Eliminating
Sands Corp. Subsidiaries Subsidiaries Entries Total
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities $ (6,366 ) $ 16,903 $ 68,586 $ — $ 79,123

Cash flows from investing activities:
Change in restricted cash and cash equivalents — (2,241 ) (2,240 ) — (4,481 )
Capital expenditures — (92,112 ) (60,052 ) — (152,164 )
Capital contributions to subsidiaries (558,570 ) (8,281 ) — 566,851 —
Intercompany payment for airplane transfer (40,000 ) 40,000 — — —

Net cash used in investing activities (598,570 ) (62,634 ) (62,292 ) 566,851 (156,645 )

Cash flows from financing activities:
Transaction cost, initial public offering (487 ) — — — (487 )
Dividends paid to shareholders — (21,052 ) — — (21,052 )
Capital contribution from Las Vegas Sands Corp. — 558,570 — (558,570 ) —
Capital contribution from Venetian Casino Resort LLC — — 8,281 (8,281 ) —
Repayments on 11% mortgage notes — (843,640 ) — — (843,640 )
Proceeds from 6.375% senior note, net of discount 247,754 — — — 247,754
Proceeds from senior secured credit facility-term B — 305,000 — — 305,000
Repayments on Interface mortgage note payable — — (1,334 ) — (1,334 )
Repurchase premiums incurred in connection with refinancing transactions — (93,289 ) — — (93,289 )
Payments of debt offering costs (1,158 ) (9,559 ) — — (10,717 )
Net change in intercompany accounts (5,577 ) 8,291 (2,714 ) — —

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 240,532 (95,679 ) 4,233 (566,851 ) (417,765 )

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents (364,404 ) (141,410 ) 10,527 — (495,287 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 744,927 388,338 161,633 — 1,294,898

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 380,523 $ 246,928 $ 172,160 $ — $ 799,611


								Non-			Consolidating/
		Las Vegas			Guarantor			Guarantor			Eliminating
		Sands Corp.			Subsidiaries			Subsidiaries			Entries			Total

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		$	(75,666	)	$	93,891		$	265,302		$	—		$	283,527

Cash flows from investing activities:
	Change in restricted cash		—			(4,838	)		(343	)		—			(5,181	)
	Capital expenditures		—			(202,193	)		(171,372	)		—			(373,565	)
	Capital contributions to subsidiaries		(558,570	)		(9,837	)		—			568,407			—
	Intercompany payment for airplane transfer		(40,000	)		40,000			—			—			—

Net cash used in investing activities			(598,570	)		(176,868	)		(171,715	)		568,407			(378,746	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
	Transaction cost, initial public offering		(487	)		—			—			—			(487	)
	Dividends paid to shareholders		—			(21,052	)		—			—			(21,052	)
	Capital contributions received		—			558,570			9,837			(568,407	)		—
	Dividend to Las Vegas Sands, Inc.		—			—			—			—			—
	Repayments on 11% mortgage notes		—			(843,640	)		—			—			(843,640	)
	Repayments on senior subordinated notes		—			—			—			—			—
	Proceeds from 6.375% senior note, net of discount		247,722			—			—			—			247,722
	Proceeds from senior secured credit facility-term B		—			305,000			—			—			305,000
	Proceeds from phase II mall construction loan		—			—			10,500			—			10,500
	Repayments on Venetian Macau senior secured notes — tranche A		—			—			(75,000	)		—			(75,000	)
	Repayments on Venetian Macau senior secured notes — tranche B		—			—			(45,000	)		—			(45,000	)
	Repayments on FF&E credit facility		—			(600	)		—			—			(600	)
	Repayments on Interface mortgage note payable		—			—			(2,448	)		—			(2,448	)
	Repurchase premiums incurred in connection with refinancing transactions		—			(113,311	)		—			—			(113,311	)
	Payments of deferred financing costs		(1,401	)		(9,755	)		(13	)		—			(11,169	)
	Net change in intercompany accounts		(3,356	)		4,189			(833	)		—			—

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities			242,478			(120,599	)		(102,957	)		(568,407	)		(549,485	)

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents			(431,758	)		(203,576	)		(9,370	)		—			(644,704	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period			744,927			388,338			161,633			—			1,294,898

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	313,169		$	184,762		$	152,263		$	—		$	650,194

LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.

~~ITEM~~Item 2—~~MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its entirety by, the condensed consolidated financial statements, and the notes thereto and other financial information included in this Form 10-Q. Certain statements in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are forward-looking statements. See “—Special Note Regarding ~~Forward—~~Forward — Looking Statements.”

General

We own and operate The Venetian Resort Hotel Casino (“The Venetian”) and The Sands Expo and Convention Center (“The Sands Expo Center”) in Las Vegas, Nevada and The Sands Macao Casino (“The Sands Macao”) in Macao, China. We are also developing two other casino resorts: The Palazzo Resort Hotel Casino (“The Palazzo”), which will be next to and connected with The Venetian and The Sands Expo Center, and The Venetian Macao Resort Hotel Casino (“The Venetian Macao”) in Macao, China.

We currently offer hotel, gaming, dining, entertainment, retail, ~~and~~ spa and other amenities at The Venetian, convention and trade show space at The Sands Expo Center and gaming, dining and VIP suites at The Sands Macao. Approximately ~~40.1%~~37.5% of our gross ~~revenues~~revenue at The Venetian for the first ~~three~~six months of 2006 was derived from gaming and ~~37.0%~~39.5% was derived from hotel rooms. The percentage of gaming revenue for The Venetian reflects the resort’s emphasis on the group convention and trade show business and the resulting higher occupancy and room rates during mid-week periods. Approximately ~~96.2%~~96.3% of The Sands Macao’s gross revenue for the first ~~three~~six months of 2006 was derived from gaming activities, with the remainder primarily derived from food and beverage services.


	*Las Vegas Projects*

The Palazzo is currently under construction and is expected to open during the summer of 2007. The Palazzo, a second resort similar in size to The Venetian, is situated on a14-acre site next to The Venetian and The Sands Expo Center and next to the Wynn Las Vegas Resort. The Palazzo is expected to consist of an all-suites, 50-floor luxury hotel tower with approximately 3,025 suites, a gaming facility of approximately 105,000 square feet and an enclosed shopping, dining and entertainment complex of approximately 450,000 square feet, which the Company has contracted to sell to a third party. The cost of The Palazzo could reach as high as $1.8 billion (exclusive of land), of which the mall (the “Phase II mall”) is expected to cost approximately $280.0 million (exclusive of certain incentive payments to executives made in July 2004). In addition, we expect that tenants will make significant additional capital expenditures to build out stores and restaurants to be located in The Palazzo. In connection with the sale of The Grand Canal Shops mall, we entered into an agreement with General Growth Partners (“GGP”), the purchaser of The Grand Canal Shops mall, to sell them the Phase II mall upon completion of construction. The purchase price that GGP has agreed to pay for the Phase II mall is the greater of (i) $250.0 million and (ii) the Phase II mall’s net operating income for months 19 through 30 of its operations divided by a capitalization rate. The capitalization rate is 6.0% on the first $38.0 million of net operating income and 8.0% on the net operating income above $38.0 million.


	*Macao Projects*

We are building The Venetian Macao, an approximately 3,000 all-suites hotel, casino and convention center complex, with a Venetian-style theme similar to that of The Venetian in Las Vegas. Under our gaming subconcession in Macao, we are obligated to develop and open The Venetian Macao and a convention center by December 2007. We currently expect to open The Venetian Macao in mid-2007. If we fail to meet the December 2007 deadline and that deadline is not extended further, we could lose our right to continue to operate The Sands Macao or any other facilities developed under our Macao gaming subconcession, and our investment to date in The Venetian Macao could be lost.

In addition, we are constructing The Venetian Macao on land for which we have not yet been granted a concession. The land concession will require us to pay certain premiums and rent. We are currently in negotiations with the Macao government over the cost of the land concession and believe we will be successful in obtaining the land concession. We expect to have the negotiations complete in the latter part of the third quarter or early part of the fourth quarter of 2006, at which point we will be required to pay the negotiated amount. The land premium will be amortized over an extended period of time. The initial term of the lease will be 25 years with unlimited 10-year renewals at the Company’s option. We expect to use the funds from the new Macao credit facility to make the portion of the land concession payments that will be due upon receipt of the provisional land grant and will finance the remaining portion through financing permitted by the Macao government and certain payment guarantees to be issued by commercial banks. Under the credit facility, the Company is required to secure the land concession in order to fully draw against the facility. If we are unable to complete the negotiations within a specified period of time, we will not be able to draw any further funds from the Macao credit facility in order to fund construction activities and we will have to seek additional financing. In the event we are unable to successfully conclude our negotiations with the Macao government with regard to the land underlying The Venetian Macao, we could lose all or a substantial part of our investment in the creation of the land and in constructing The Venetian Macao and would not be able to open and operate that facility as planned.

In addition, we broke ground in October 2005 on an expansion of The Sands Macao that will enhance the size and scope of the property and increase gaming capacity by more than 30.0%. Construction of The Venetian Macao and the expansion of The Sands Macao are progressing according to plan.

In connection with the development of The Venetian Macao, we are sponsoring a master plan for the development of multiple properties on the Cotai Strip^tm. We have submitted development plans to the Macao government for six casino-resort developments in addition to The Venetian Macao on an area of approximately 200 acres located on the Cotai Strip. The developments are expected to include hotels, exhibition and conference facilities, casinos, showrooms, shopping malls, spas, world-class restaurants and entertainment facilities and other attractions and amenities, as well as common public areas. The Company is in the early stages of developing these properties, including land preparation and certain foundation work. We plan to own and operate all of the casinos in these developments under our Macao gaming subconcession.

We intend to develop the other Cotai Strip properties as follows:

•

One of them is intended to be a Four Seasons hotel and casino, which will be adjacent to The Venetian Macao and is expected to ~~open during~~be a boutique hotel with 400 luxury hotel rooms, up to 800 Four Seasons-serviced vacation suites, distinctive dining experiences, a full service spa and other amenities, a 45,000 square foot casino and a 190,000 square foot mall with upscale retail offerings. We will own the summer of 2007. The cost of The Palazzo could reach as high as $1.8 billion (exclusive of land), of which the mall (the “Phase II mall”) is expected to cost approximately $280.0 million (exclusive of certain incentive payments to executives made in July 2004). In addition, we expect tenants will make significant additional capital expenditures to build out storeshotel and ~~restaurants in The Palazzo. In connection with the sale of The Grand Canal Shops mall, we~~vacation suites. We have entered into an ~~agreement with General Growth Partners (“GGP”),~~exclusive non-binding letter of intent and are currently negotiating definitive agreements under which Four Seasons Hotels Inc. will manage the ~~purchaser of~~hotel and vacation suites. The Grand Canal Shops mall, to construct and sell the Phase II mall. The purchase price that GGP has agreed to pay for the Phase II mall is the greater of (i) $250.0 million and (ii) the Phase II mall’s net operating income for months 19 through 30 of its operations divided by a capitalization rate. The capitalization rate is 6.0% up to $38.0 million of net operating income and 8.0% above $38.0 million.

~~Macao Projects~~

We are building The Venetian Macao, an approximately 3,000 all-suites hotel, casino and convention center complex, with a Venetian-style theme similar to that of our Las Vegas property. Under our gaming subconcession in Macao, we are obligated to develop and open The Venetian Macao and a convention center by December 2007. We are also obligated to invest at least 4.4 billion patacas (approximately $550.2 million at exchange rates in effect on March 31, 2006) in various development projects in Macao by June 2009. As of March 31, 2006, we had spent more than the required minimum amount. We currently expect to open The Venetian Macao in mid-2007. If we fail to meet the December 2007 deadline we could lose our right to continue to operate The Sands Macao or any other facilities development under our Macao gaming subconcession and our investment to date in The Venetian Macao could be lost. In addition, we are constructing The Venetian Macao on land for which we have not yet been granted a concession. If we do not obtain a land concession, we could forfeit all or a part of our investment in the site and construction of The Venetian Macao and would not be able to open and operate that facility as planned.

~~In addition, we broke ground in October 2005 on an expansion of The Sands Macao that will enhance the size and scope of the property and increase gaming capacity by more than 65.0%. Construction~~completion of The Venetian Macao and the ~~expansion~~Four Seasons is not dependent upon the Macao government’s overall approval of ~~The Sands Macao are progressing according~~our Cotai Strip master development plan.

•

One of them is intended to ~~plan. In connection~~include a two hotel complex with 1,500 luxury and mid-sized hotel rooms as part of its initial phase, luxury vacation suites, a casino and a retail shopping mall. We will own the entire development, and we have entered into a management agreement with Shangri-La Hotels and Resorts to manage the hotels and vacation suites under its Shangri-La and Traders brands.

•

One of ~~The Venetian Macao,~~them is intended to include a two-hotel complex with 1,500 luxury and mid-sized hotel rooms as part of its initial phase, luxury vacation suites, a casino and a retail shopping mall physically connected to the mall in the Shangri-La/ Traders hotel podium. We will own the entire development, and we are ~~sponsoring a master plan for~~negotiating with Starwood Hotel and Resorts to manage the ~~development of multiple properties on the Cotai Strip.~~

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~

hotels and vacation suites under its brands.

•

We have submitted development plans to the Macao government for six casino-resort developments in addition to The Venetian Macao on an area of approximately 200 acres on the Cotai Strip. The developments are expected to include hotels, exhibition and conference facilities, casinos, showrooms, shopping malls, spas, world-class restaurants and entertainment facilities and other attractions, as well as common public areas. We plan to own and operate all of the casinos in these developments under our Macao gaming subconcession.

~~We intend~~expect to develop ~~the~~and own two other Cotai Strip developments, ~~as follows:~~

	•		One of them is intended to be a Four Seasons hotel and casino, which will be adjacent to The Venetian Macao and is expected to be a boutique hotel with 400 luxury hotel rooms, up to 600 Four Seasons-serviced vacation suites, distinctive dining experiences, full service spas and other amenities, a 25,000 square foot casino and a 190,000 square foot mall with upscale retail offerings. We will own the hotel and vacation suites. We have entered into an exclusive nonbinding letter of intent and are currently negotiating definitive agreements under which Four Seasons Hotels Inc. will manage the hotel and vacation suites. The completion of The Venetian Macao and the Four Seasons is not dependent upon the Macao government’s overall approval of our Cotai Strip master development plan.

	•		One of them is intended to include a two hotel complex with 1,500 luxury and mid-sized hotel rooms, luxury vacation suites, a casino and a retail shopping mall. We will own the entire development, and we have entered into a management agreement with Shangri-La Hotels and Resorts to manage the hotels and vacation suites under its Shangri-La and Traders brands.

	•		One of them is intended to include a two-hotel complex with luxury and mid-sized hotel rooms, luxury vacation suites, a casino and a retail shopping mall physically connected to the mall in the Shangri-La/Traders hotel podium. We will own the entire development, and we are negotiating with Starwood Hotel and Resorts to manage the hotels and vacation suites under its brands.

	•		~~We expect to develop and own two other Cotai Strip developments,~~ each of which is intended to include a two-hotel complex with 1,500 luxury and mid-sized hotel rooms in their initial phases, luxury vacation suites, a casino and a retail shopping mall. We will own the entire development. We have entered into a non-binding agreement with Hilton Hotels to manage one of the hotel complexes and are in discussions with experienced and well-known hotel management companies to manage the hotel portions of the other resort for us under their brands.

	•		We have signed a non-binding memorandum of agreement with an independent developer for another Cotai Strip Development. We are currently negotiating definitive agreements pursuant to which we plan to partner with this developer to build a multi-hotel complex under several hotel brands.

~~We do not yet have all the Macao government approvals that we will need in order to develop the Cotai Strip developments.~~

We expect to make land premium payments relating to The Venetian Macao and other Macao properties under development in amounts to be determined. We currently estimate that the cost for The Venetian Macao will be approximately $2.3 billion (exclusive of land) and the cost for The Sands Macao expansion will be approximately $99.0 million. Venetian Macau Limited and its subsidiaries (“VML”) are finalizing commitments for a $2.5 billion senior secured credit facility to partially fund The Sands Macao expansion and the design, development, construction and pre-opening costs for The Venetian Macao, the Four Seasons Hotel and some of our other development projects on the Cotai Strip, and to pay related fees and expenses. We have ~~not yet finalized our estimate of the cost of our other Cotai Strip developments; however, we will need to arrange additional debt financing to finance those costs as well.~~

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~
entered into a non-binding agreements with Hilton Hotels and Fairmont Raffles to manage the hotel complexes under their respective brands.
• We have signed a non-binding memorandum of agreement with an independent developer for another Cotai Strip Development. We are currently negotiating definitive agreements pursuant to which we plan to partner with this developer to build a multi-hotel complex under several hotel brands.
      We do not yet have all the necessary Macao government approvals that we will need in order to develop these other Cotai Strip developments.
      We expect to make land premium payments relating to The Venetian Macao and other Macao properties under development in amounts that will be determined based on negotiations with the Macao government. We currently estimate that the cost of developing and building The Venetian Macao will be approximately $2.3 billion (exclusive of the land concession payment) and the cost for The Sands Macao expansion will be approximately $99.0 million for the expansion to increase gaming capacity and approximately $85.0 million for the hotel tower expansion. During May 2006, our subsidiary Venetian Macau Limited and its subsidiaries (“VML”) obtained a $2.5 billion credit facility to fund The Sands Macao expansion and partially fund the design, development, construction and pre-opening costs for The Venetian Macao, the Four Seasons Hotel and some of our other development projects on the Cotai Strip, and to pay related fees and expenses. We have not yet finalized our estimate of the cost of our other Cotai Strip developments; however, we will need to arrange additional debt financing to finance those costs as well.
Singapore Project
      In May 2006, we were selected by the Singapore government to build and operate an integrated resort called the Marina Bay Sands in Singapore, which will be a large integrated resort, including a casino. As a result of being selected to build the project, we are required to pay the Singapore government $1.20 billion Singapore dollars (approximately US$751.1 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2006) in premium payments for use of the land on which the resort will be built plus an additional $298.2 million Singapore dollars (approximately US$186.7 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2006) for various taxes and other fees. As of June 30, 2006, we had paid $300.0 million Singapore dollars (approximately US$187.8 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2006) related to the land premium payments. The remaining amount due of approximately $1.20 billion Singapore dollars (approximately US$750.0 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2006) is due on August 24, 2006. We are currently in the process of obtaining bridge financing in the amount of $1.4 billion to cover the above payments as well as the initial development costs for the project.
      At the time these remaining amounts are paid, we will enter into the development agreement, which will require us to construct and operate the Marina Bay Sands in accordance with the Company’s proposal for this integrated resort and in accordance with that agreement. Based on the proposal we submitted to the Singapore government, we will develop and construct the Marina Bay Sands Resort for approximately $3.6 billion, inclusive of the land premium, taxes and other fees discussed above. Upon completion of the bridge financing, the Company will immediately focus its efforts on lining up long-term financing in an amount necessary to fund the construction of Marina Bay Sands.
Other Development Projects
Following the Singapore government’s adoption of gaming legislation in 2005, we submitted a proposal to the Singapore government for a license to develop a large integrated resort, including a casino, in Singapore. There are currently three competing proposals for this resort/casino license. The Singapore government is expected to award this license in mid-2006.
We have entered into a non-binding agreement with the Zhuhai Municipal People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China to work with it to create a master plan for, and develop, a leisure and convention destination resort on Hengqin Island, located approximately one mile from the Cotai Strip. We are actively preparing preliminary design concepts for presentation to the government. This development is subject to a number of conditions, including receiving further governmental approvals.
On December 3, 2004, following the enactment of legislation legalizing slot machine gaming in Pennsylvania, we entered into a contribution agreement with Bethworks Now, LLC, the owner of an approximately 124 acre site located in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. We have submitted a proposal to obtain one mile from the Cotai Strip. We are actively preparing preliminary design concepts for presentation to the government. This development is subject to a number of conditions, including receiving further governmental approvals.
      On December 3, 2004, following the enactment of legislation legalizing slot machine gaming in Pennsylvania, we entered into a contribution agreement with Bethworks Now, LLC, the owner of an approximately 124-acre site located in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania. We have submitted a proposal to obtain one
29
of two “at large” gaming licenses currently available in Pennsylvania. There are several competing proposals for these licenses. If our proposal is accepted and a slot machine license under the new legislation is granted for the site, we intend to jointly own and develop the property for use as a casino complex including a hotel with meeting rooms and retail, restaurant, movie theater, office and other commercial spaces. The Bethlehem development is subject to a number of conditions, including obtaining the ~~gaming license.~~
We have also entered into agreements to develop and lease gaming and entertainment facilities with two prominent football clubs in the United Kingdom and are in discussions with several others to build entertainment and gaming facilities in major cities in the United Kingdom. There are several competing proposals for the single “regional” casino license currently authorized by statute. Our agreements to develop and lease gaming and entertainment facilities are subject to a number of conditions, including obtaining a gaming license.
We are currently exploring the possibility of operating casino resorts in additional Asian jurisdictions, the United States and Europe.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates those estimates, including those related to allowance for doubtful accounts and discounts, accruals for slot marketing points, self-insurance and litigation, asset impairment, stock-based compensation, and income taxes. We state these accounting policies in the notes to ~~the~~our consolidated financial statements and in relevant sections in this discussion and analysis. These estimates are based on historical information, information that is currently available to us and on various other assumptions that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could vary from those estimates and we may change our estimates and assumptions in future evaluations. Changes in these estimates and assumptions may have a material effect on our results of operations and financial condition. We believe that the critical accounting policies discussed below affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
~~Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Discounts~~
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Discounts
We maintain an allowance, or reserve, for doubtful accounts and discounts at our operating casino resorts, The Venetian and The Sands Macao. The provision for doubtful accounts, an operating expense, increases the allowance for doubtful accounts and discounts, while specific write-offs decrease the allowance for doubtful accounts and discounts. We regularly evaluate the allowance for doubtful accounts and discounts. At The Venetian, where credit or marker play is significant, we apply standard reserve percentages to aged account balances under a specified dollar amount and specifically analyze the collectibility of each account with a balance over the specified dollar amount, based upon the age of the account, the customer’s financial condition, collection history and any other known information. We also
22

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~
~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~

monitor regional and global economic conditions and forecasts to determine if reserve levels are adequate. At The Sands Macao, where credit or marker play is not significant, we apply a standard reserve percentage to aged account balances. The mix of credit play as a percentage of total casino play has decreased significantly since 2004 because The Sands Macao table games play is primarily cash play, while The Venetian credit table games play represents approximately ~~66.9%~~62.3% of total table games ~~play.~~play at The Venetian. Our allowance for doubtful accounts and discounts was ~~$53.8~~$56.0 million and $49.0 million, or ~~33.2%~~39.2% and 36.6% of gross accounts receivable, as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.

~~Self-Insurance and Slot Club Point Accruals~~


	*Self-Insurance and Slot Club Point Accruals*

We maintain accruals for health and workers compensation self-insurance and slot club point redemption, which are classified in other accrued liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. We determine the adequacy of these accruals by periodically evaluating the historical experience and projected trends related to these accruals and in consultation with outside actuarial experts for the self-insurance accruals. If such information indicates that the accruals are overstated or understated, or if business conditions indicate we should adjust the assumptions utilized, we will reduce or provide for additional accruals as appropriate.

~~Litigation Accrual~~


	*Litigation Accrual*

We are subject to various claims and legal actions. We estimate the accruals for these claims and legal actions in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 5, “Accounting for Contingencies,” and include such accruals in the other accrued liability category in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

~~Property and Equipment~~


	*Property and Equipment*

At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, we had net property and equipment of ~~$2.89~~$3.35 billion, representing ~~70.5%~~58.3% of our total assets. We depreciate property and equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives are based on the nature of the assets as well as current operating strategy and legal considerations such as contractual life. Future events, such as property expansions, property developments, new competition, or new regulations, could result in a change in the manner in which we use certain assets requiring a change in the estimated useful lives of such assets. In assessing the recoverability of the carrying value of property and equipment if events and circumstance warrant such an assessment, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors. If these estimates or the related assumptions change, we may be required to record an impairment loss for these assets. Such an impairment loss would be recognized as a non-cash component of operating income.

~~Stock-Based Compensation~~


	*Stock-Based Compensation*

SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment” requires the recognition of compensation expense in the condensed consolidated statements of operations related to the fair value of employee stock-based compensation. Determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires judgment, including estimating the expected term that stock options will be outstanding prior to exercise, the associated volatility and the expected dividends. Expected volatilities are based on the historical volatilities from a selection of companies from our peer group due to our lack of historical information. We used the simplified method for estimating expected option life, as the options qualify as “plain-vanilla” options. We believe that the valuation technique and the approach utilized to develop the underlying assumptions are appropriate in calculating the fair values of our stock options granted. Judgment is also required in estimating the amount of stock-based awards expected to be forfeited prior to vesting. If actual forfeitures differ significantly from these estimates, stock-based compensation expense could be materially impacted. Prior to adopting SFAS No. 123R, we applied Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related Interpretations, in accounting for its stock-based compensation plans. All employee stock options were granted at or above the grant date market price. Accordingly, no compensation cost was recognized for fixed stock option grants in prior periods.

Income Taxes

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~
~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~

~~Income Taxes~~

We are subject to income taxes in the United States, and in several states and foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. We account for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under SFAS No. 109, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on differences between financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates. SFAS No. 109 requires the recognition of deferred tax assets, net of any applicable valuation allowances, related to net operating loss carryforwards, tax credits and other temporary differences. The standard requires recognition of a future tax benefit to the extent that realization of such benefit is more likely than not; otherwise, a valuation allowance is applied.

Our income tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) and other tax authorities. While positions taken in tax returns are sometimes subject to uncertainty in the tax laws, we do not take such positions unless we have “substantial authority” to do so under the Internal Revenue Code and applicable regulations. We may take positions on our tax returns based on substantial authority that are not ultimately accepted by the IRS. The IRS is currently examining our federal income tax returns for the years ended December 31, 1998, 1999, and 2000.

We assess potential unfavorable outcomes based on the criteria of SFAS No. 5. We establish a tax reserve if an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the unfavorable outcome can be reasonably estimated. We assess the potential outcomes of tax uncertainties on a quarterly basis. In determining whether the probable criterion of SFAS No. 5 is met, we presume that the taxing authority will focus on the exposure and we assess the probable outcome of a particular issue based upon the relevant legal and technical merits. We also apply our judgment regarding the potential actions by the tax authorities and resolution through the settlement process.

We maintain required tax reserves until such time as the underlying issue is resolved. When actual results differ from reserve estimates, we will adjust the income tax provision and our tax reserves in the period resolved. For tax years that are examined by taxing authorities, we will adjust tax reserves in the year the tax examinations are settled. For tax years that are not examined by taxing authorities, we will adjust tax reserves in the year that the statute of limitations expires. Our estimate of the potential outcome for any uncertain tax issue is highly judgmental, and we believe we have adequately provided for any reasonable and foreseeable outcomes related to uncertain tax matters.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 123R, which supersedes APB Opinion No. 25. This statement requires compensation costs related to stock-based transactions to be recognized in financial statements. This statement also requires the benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost to be reported as a financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow. The provisions of this statement are effective as of the first annual reporting period that begins after January 1, 2006. This statement requires ~~public entities~~companies to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). This cost ~~will be~~is being recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. This statement also addresses the accounting for the tax effects of stock-based compensation awards. We adopted this standard as of January 1, 2006 using the modified prospective application; accordingly, prior periods have not been restated. Under the modified prospective application we ~~will expense~~are expensing the cost of stock-based compensation awards issued after January 1, 2006. Additionally, we ~~will recognize~~are recognizing compensation cost for the portion of awards outstanding on January 1, 2006 for which the requisite service has not been rendered as the requisite service is to be rendered on or after January 1, 2006. We have chosen to continue to use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to calculate the fair value of ~~its~~our stock ~~option grants.~~options. During the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, we recorded $2.9 million and $5.7 million of stock-based compensation ~~expense.~~expense, respectively. No amounts for stock-based compensation were recorded for the three and six months ended ~~March 31, 2006.~~June 30, 2005. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, there was ~~$44.9~~$48.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost, net of estimated forfeitures of 8.0%, related to nonvested stock options and there was $2.9 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested restricted stock. The stock option and restricted stock costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of ~~3.7~~3.6 years and ~~2.7~~2.4 years, respectively.

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~
~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~

In ~~May 2005,~~July 2006, the FASB issued ~~SFAS~~Interpretation (“FIN”) No. ~~154,~~48, “Accounting ~~Changes and Error Corrections—a replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and FASB Statement No. 3,”~~for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, which ~~changes the requirements for~~clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements in accordance with SFAS No. 109. FIN No. 48 provides guidance on the financial statement recognition and ~~reporting~~measurement of a ~~change~~tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting ~~principle. SFAS~~in interim periods, disclosures, and transition. FIN No. ~~154 applies~~48 will require entities to ~~all voluntary changes in accounting principle, as well as~~assess the likelihood that uncertain tax positions will be accepted by the applicable taxing authority and then measure the amount of benefit to ~~changes required by an accounting pronouncement if the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. This statement requires retrospective application~~be recognized for these purposes which are considered greater than 50% likely to ~~prior periods’ financial statements of changes in accounting principle. SFAS~~be sustained. FIN No. ~~154~~48 is effective for ~~accounting changes and corrections of errors made in~~ fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2005. The adoption on January 1, 2006~~2006. We are currently evaluating the impact of ~~SFAS No. 154 did not have a material effect~~this standard on our condensed consolidated financial ~~position, results of operations, or cash flows.~~statements.

Summary Financial Results

The following table summarizes our results of operations:

Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands, except for percentages)
Percent
2006 2005 Change
Net revenues $ 530,364 $ 403,794 31.3 %
Operating expenses 381,484 278,458 37.0 %
Operating income 148,880 125,336 18.8 %
Income (loss) before income taxes 137,843 (27,187 ) 607.0 %
Net income 121,783 7,112 1,612.4 %

Three Months Ended March 31,
Percent of Net Revenues
2006 2005
Operating expenses 71.9 % 69.0 %
Operating income 28.0 % 31.0 %
Income (loss) before income taxes 26.0 % -6.7 %
Net income 23.0 % 1.8 %

Three Months Ended June 30, Six Months Ended June 30,

Percent Percent
2006 2005 Change 2006 2005 Change

(In thousands, except for percentages) (In thousands, except for percentages)
Net revenues $ 517,007 $ 398,821 29.6% $ 1,047,371 $ 802,615 30.5%
Operating expenses 391,592 284,678 37.6% 773,076 563,136 37.3%
Operating income 125,415 114,143 9.9% 274,295 239,479 14.5%
Income before income taxes 116,734 97,850 19.3% 254,577 70,663 260.3%
Net income 109,329 86,429 26.5% 231,112 93,541 147.1%

Three Months Ended Six Months Ended
June, June,

2006 2005 2006 2005

Percent of Net Percent of Net
Revenues Revenues
Operating expenses 75.7% 71.4% 73.8% 70.2%
Operating income 24.3% 28.6% 26.2% 29.8%
Income before income taxes 22.6% 24.5% 24.3% 8.8%
Net income 21.1% 21.7% 22.1% 11.7%

Operating Results

~~Key operating revenue measurements~~


	*Key operating revenue measurements*

The Venetian’s operating revenue is dependent upon the volume of customers who stay at the hotel, which affects the price that can be charged for hotel rooms and the volume of table games and slot machine play. The Sands Macao is almost wholly dependent on casino customers that visit the casino on a daily basis. Hotel revenues are not expected to be material for The Sands Macao. Visitors to The Sands Macao arrive by ferry, automobile, airplane or helicopter from Hong Kong, cities in China, and other Southeast Asian cities in close proximity to Macao.

The following are the key measurements we use to evaluate operating revenue:

Hotel revenue measurements include hotel occupancy rate, which is the average percentage of available hotel rooms occupied during a period, and average daily room rate, which is the average price of occupied rooms per day. Revenue per available room represents a summary of hotel average daily room rates and occupancy. Because not all available rooms are occupied, average daily room rates are higher than revenue per available room.


	Hotel revenue measurements include hotel occupancy rate, which is the average percentage of available hotel rooms occupied during a period, and average daily room rate, which is the average price of occupied rooms per day. Revenue per available room represents a summary of hotel average daily room rates and occupancy. Because not all available rooms are occupied, average daily room rates are higher than revenue per available room.

	Casino revenue measurements for Las Vegas: Table games drop and slot handle are volume measurements. Win or hold percentage represents the percentage of drop or handle, respectively, that is won by the casino and recorded as casino revenue. Table games drop represents the sum of markers issued (credit instruments) less markers paid at the table, plus cash deposited in the table drop box. Slot handle is the gross amount wagered or coin placed into slot machines in aggregate for the period cited. Drop and handle are abbreviations for table games drop and slot handle. Based upon our mix of table games, our table games produce a statistical average table win percentage (calculated before discounts) as measured as a percentage of table game drop of 20.0% to 22.0%, and slot machines produce a statistical average slot machine win percentage (calculated before slot club cash incentives) as measured as a percentage of slot machine handle generally between 6.0% and 7.0%.

	Casino revenue measurements for Macao: We view Macao table games as being segregated into two groups, consistent with the Macao market’s convention: Rolling Chip play (all VIP play) and Non-Rolling Chip play (mostly non-VIP players). The volume measurement for Rolling Chip play is non-

33
negotiable gaming chips wagered. The volume measurement for Non-Rolling Chip play is table games drop as described above. Rolling Chip volume and Non-Rolling Chip volume are not equivalent because, since Rolling Chip volume is a measure of amounts wagered versus dropped, Rolling Chip volume is substantially higher than drop. Slot handle at The Sands Macao is the gross amount wagered or coins placed into slot machines in aggregate for the period cited.
      We view Rolling Chip table games win as a percentage of Rolling Chip volume and we view Non-Rolling Chip table games win as a percentage of drop. Win or hold percentage represents the percentage of Rolling Chip volume, Non-Rolling Chip drop or slot handle that is won by the casino and recorded as casino revenue. Based upon our mix of table games in Macao, our Rolling Chip table games win percentage (calculated before discounts and commissions) as measured as a percentage of Rolling Chip volume is expected to be 2.5% to 2.8% and our Non-Rolling Chip play table games are expected to produce a statistical average table win percentage as measured as a percentage of table game drop (before discounts and commissions) of 17.0% to 19.0%. Like in Las Vegas, our Macao slot machines produce a statistical average slot machine win percentage as measured as a percentage of slot machine handle of generally between 6.0% and 7.0%.
~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~
~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~
~~Casino revenue measurements for Las Vegas:~~Table games drop and slot handle are volume measurements. Win or hold percentage represents the percentage of drop or handle that is won by the casino and recorded as casino revenue. Table games drop represents the sum of markers issued (credit instruments) less markers paid at the table, plus cash deposited in the table drop box. Slot handle is the gross amount wagered or coin placed into slot machines in aggregate for the period cited. Drop and handle are abbreviations for table games drop and slot handle. Based upon our mix of table games, our table games produce a statistical average table win percentage (calculated before discounts) as measured as a percentage of table game drop of 20.0% to 22.0% and slot machines produce a statistical average slot machine win percentage (calculated before slot club cash incentives) as measured as a percentage of slot machine handle generally between 6.0% and 7.0%.
~~Casino revenue measurements for Macao:~~We view Macao table games as being segregated into two groups, consistent with the Macao market’s convention: Rolling Chip play (all VIP play) and Non-Rolling Chip play (mostly non-VIP players). The volume measurement for Rolling Chip play is non-negotiable gaming chips wagered. The volume measurement for Non-Rolling Chip is table games drop as described above. Rolling Chip volume and Non-Rolling Chip volume are not equivalent because, since Rolling Chip volume is a measure of amounts wagered versus dropped, Rolling Chip volume is substantially higher than drop. Slot handle at The Sands Macao is the gross amount wagered or coins placed into slot machines in aggregate for the period cited.
We view Rolling Chip table games win as a percentage of Rolling Chip volume and we view Non-Rolling Chip table games win as a percentage of drop. Win or hold percentage represents the percentage of Rolling Chip volume, Non-Rolling Chip drop or slot handle that is won by the casino and recorded as casino revenue. Based upon our mix of table games in Macao, our Rolling Chip table games win percentage (calculated before discounts and commissions) as measured as a percentage of Rolling Chip volume is expected to be 2.5% to 2.8% and our Non-Rolling Chip play table games are expected to produce a statistical average table win percentage as measured as a percentage of table game drop (before discounts and commissions) of 17.0% to 19.0%. Like in Las Vegas, our Macao slot machines produce a statistical average slot machine win percentage as measured as a percentage of slot machine handle of generally between 6.0% and 7.0%.
Actual win may vary from the statistical average. Generally, slot machine play at The Venetian and The Sands Macao is conducted on a cash ~~basis,~~basis. The Venetian’s table games revenue is approximately ~~66.9%~~62.3% from credit based guests wagering for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and The Sands Macao’s table game play is conducted primarily on a cash basis.
Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 compared to the Three Months Ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005
~~Operating Revenues~~
Operating Revenues
Our net revenues consisted of the following:

Three Months Ended June 30,

Percent
2006 2005 Change

(In thousands, except for percentages)
Net Revenues

Casino $ 378,462 $ 274,808 37.7 %
Rooms 89,654 83,983 6.8 %
Food and beverage 44,023 34,698 26.9 %
Convention, retail and other 29,276 24,354 20.2 %

541,415 417,843 29.6 %
Less — promotional allowances (24,408 ) (19,022 ) -28.3 %

Total net revenues $ 517,007 $ 398,821 29.6 %

Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands, except for percentages)
Percent
2006 2005 Change
Net Revenues

Casino $ 375,382 $ 265,786 41.2 %
Rooms 91,138 86,077 5.9 %
Food and beverage 51,816 43,489 19.1 %
Convention, retail and other 35,005 28,454 23.0 %

553,341 423,806 30.6 %
Less — promotional allowances (22,977 ) (20,012 ) -14.8 %

Total net revenues $ 530,364 $ 403,794 31.3 %

26
~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~
~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~
Consolidated net revenues were ~~$530.4~~$517.0 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, an increase of ~~$126.6~~$118.2 million compared to ~~$403.8~~$398.8 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The increase in net revenues was due primarily to an increase in casino revenue of ~~$109.6~~$103.7 million. This increase is primarily attributable to the growth of our casino operations at The Sands ~~Macao and the formal introduction of our Rolling Chip program in March 2005.~~Macao.
Casino revenues were ~~$375.4~~$378.5 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, an increase of ~~$109.6~~$103.7 million as compared to ~~$265.8~~$274.8 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. Of the increase, ~~$107.2~~$106.1 million was attributable to the growth of our casino operations at The Sands ~~Macao and the formal introduction of our Rolling Chip program in March 2005.~~Macao. For the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, table games drop (the Non-Rolling chip ~~segment)~~portion) at The Sands Macao increased ~~$203.6~~$121.0 million to $1.04 billion and the related win percentage increased ~~1.4~~2.1 percentage points to 18.6% as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. In addition, the Rolling Chip volume increased ~~$2.84~~$2.27 billion to $4.26 billion and the related win percentage increased from ~~2.1%~~2.6% to ~~2.5%~~3.0% as compared to the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, The Venetian’s casino revenues decreased $2.4 million to $71.3 million. Table games drop increased $1.0 million to $254.2 million; however,
34
the related win percentage dropped 1.0 percentage points to 17.6% as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2005. Slot handle at The Venetian increased from $496.0 million to $522.7 million; however, the related win percentage decreased from 6.8% to 6.2% as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2005. In our experience, average win percentages remain steady when measured over extended periods of time, but can vary considerably within shorter time periods as a result of the statistical variances that are associated with games of chance in which large amounts are wagered.
Room revenues for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 were ~~$91.1~~$89.7 million, an increase of ~~$5.0~~$5.7 million as compared to ~~$86.1~~$84.0 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The increase was attributable to the increase in average daily room rate from ~~$243~~$231 for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 to ~~$249~~$242 for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, as well as an increase in occupancy rate from ~~97.8%~~98.7% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 to ~~99.9%~~99.5% for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 at The Venetian. The Venetian generated revenue per available room of ~~$248~~$241 for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, as compared to ~~$237~~$228 for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The impact on revenues of the increase in the average daily room rate was partially offset by an increased percentage of rooms being occupied by groups at a slightly lower rate, which was driven by our strategy to emphasize The Venetian as a destination for tradeshows and groups, including filling our new meeting room space with group business.
Food and beverage revenues were ~~$51.8~~$44.0 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, an increase of ~~$8.3~~$9.3 million as compared to ~~$43.5~~$34.7 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily attributable to food and beverage revenues at The Venetian, which increased ~~$8.1~~$7.4 million due to increased hotel occupancy and banquet business ~~at the property.~~driven by our strategy discussed above.
Convention, retail and other revenues were ~~$35.0~~$29.3 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, an increase of ~~$6.5~~$4.9 million as compared to ~~$28.5~~$24.4 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The increase is primarily attributable to ~~$3.3~~$1.8 million of additional revenues from The Sands Expo Center ~~due to a strong quarter for conventions~~resulting from our strategy discussed above and ~~$2.1~~$1.7 million in revenues associated with the Blue Man Group performances, which began during the fourth quarter of 2005.
27
Operating Expenses
~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~
~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~
~~Operating Expenses~~
The breakdown of operating expenses is as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30,

Percent
2006 2005 Change

(In thousands, except for percentages)
Operating Expenses

Casino $ 217,244 $ 146,546 48.2 %
Rooms 21,996 20,227 8.7 %
Food and beverage 22,813 17,879 27.6 %
Convention, retail and other 15,728 13,723 14.6 %
Provision for doubtful accounts 3,321 782 324.7 %
General and administrative 57,337 48,214 18.9 %
Corporate expense 12,251 6,620 85.1 %
Rental expense 3,803 3,682 3.3 %
Pre-opening expense 4,354 504 763.9 %
Development expense 7,861 5,562 41.3 %
Depreciation and amortization 24,428 21,097 15.8 %
(Gain) loss on disposal of assets 456 (158 ) 388.6 %

Total operating expenses $ 391,592 $ 284,678 37.6 %

35

Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands, except for percentages)
Percent
2006 2005 Change
Operating Expenses

Casino $ 205,344 $ 131,953 55.6 %
Rooms 21,753 21,115 3.0 %
Food and beverage 24,057 20,965 14.7 %
Convention, retail and other 16,395 14,376 14.0 %
Provision for doubtful accounts 4,989 3,386 47.3 %
General and administrative 54,812 45,773 19.7 %
Corporate expense 12,954 10,882 19.0 %
Rental expense 3,707 3,705 0.1 %
Pre-opening expense 2,219 — —
Development expense 9,168 5,175 77.2 %
Depreciation and amortization 25,005 19,965 25.2 %
Loss on disposal of assets 1,081 1,163 -7.1 %

Total operating expenses $ 381,484 $ 278,458 37.0 %

Operating expenses were ~~$381.5~~$391.6 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, an increase of ~~$103.0~~$106.9 million as compared to ~~$278.5~~$284.7 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to the higher operating revenues and growth of our operating ~~businesses~~business in Macao and to a lesser extent in Las Vegas, ~~and Macao.~~as more fully described below.
Casino department expenses were ~~$205.3~~$217.2 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, an increase of ~~$73.3~~$70.7 million as compared to ~~$132.0~~$146.5 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily attributable to the additional casino expenses, including higher payroll and benefits, commissions, casino advertising and gross win taxes, related to the growth of our operations at The Sands ~~Macao and increased slot machine and table games volume at The Venetian.~~Macao. Of the ~~$73.3~~$70.7 million increase in casino expenses, ~~$51.9~~$47.9 million was due to the 39.0% gross win tax on casino revenues in Macao. Despite the higher gross win tax, casino operating margins at The Sands Macao are similar to those at The Venetian primarily because of lower labor, marketing and sales expenses in Macao. For the three months ended June 30, 2006, casino expenses at The Venetian were higher than in the prior year due to higher payroll and related benefit costs, resulting from increased headcount associated with our targeted investments at the property, which include the poker room and the Blue Man and Phantom of the Opera productions, and a spike in high dollar medical claims during the quarter. Food and beverage expense increased ~~$3.1~~$4.9 million, primarily related to the increased food and beverage revenue noted above.
The provision for doubtful accounts was ~~$5.0~~$3.3 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, compared to ~~$3.4~~$0.8 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The prior year amount includes a $1.8 million recovery that did not occur during the three months ended June 30, 2006. The amount of this provision can vary over short periods of time because of factors specific to the customers who owe us money from gaming activities at any given time. We believe that the amount of our provision for doubtful accounts in the future will depend upon the state of the economy, our credit standards, our risk assessments and the judgment of our employees responsible for granting credit.
General and administrative expenses were ~~$54.8~~$57.3 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, an increase of ~~$9.0~~$9.1 million as compared to ~~$45.8~~$48.2 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The increase was attributable to the growth of our operating businesses in Las Vegas and ~~Macao.~~Macao as discussed in the casino expense section above.
Corporate expense for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 was ~~$13.0~~$12.3 million, an increase of ~~$2.1~~$5.7 million as compared to ~~$10.9~~$6.6 million for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily attributable to ~~$4.4~~$4.6 million of corporate general and administrative costs as we ~~build~~increase our headcount in the corporate ~~infrastructure,~~area to support our continued expansion activities, and $1.1 million related to stock-based compensation recorded in connection with the adoption of SFAS No. 123R.
      Pre-opening and development expenses were $4.4 million and $7.9 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $0.5 million and $5.6 million, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Pre-opening expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2006 were primarily related to The Venetian Macao project and the casino expansion at The Sands Macao. We expect that pre-opening expense will increase as The Venetian Macao and The Palazzo projects approach their anticipated 2007 opening dates. The increase in development expenses was primarily related to our increased activities in Singapore, Macao, Pennsylvania and Europe.
      Depreciation and amortization expense for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $24.4 million, an increase of $3.3 million as compared to $21.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily the result of placing into service various assets at The Venetian since the second quarter of 2005, including the Blue Man Group Theater, new meeting rooms and the renovation of the pool deck.
36
Interest Expense
      The following table summarizes information related to interest expense on long-term debt:

Three Months Ended
June 30,

2006 2005

(In thousands, except for
percentages)
Interest cost $ 44,585 $ 23,001
Less: Capitalized interest (20,900 ) (5,032 )

Interest expense, net $ 23,685 $ 17,969

Cash paid for interest $ 37,820 $ 18,355
Average total debt balance $ 2,301,277 $ 1,503,242
Weighted average interest rate 7.8 % 4.8 %
      Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, was $23.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $5.7 million as compared to $18.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. Interest expense increased during the three months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2005 due to an increase in interest rates and an increase in our average long-term debt balances resulting primarily from the completion of the $2.50 billion Macao credit facility, in late May 2006, to support our expansion activities in Macao. We expect that the interest expense amount will continue to increase as our long-term debt balances and interest rates increase. This increase was offset by the capitalization of $20.9 million of interest during the three months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $5.0 million of capitalized interest during the three months ended June 30, 2005. We expect that the capitalized interest amount will continue to increase as The Venetian Macao and The Palazzo projects approach their anticipated 2007 opening dates.
Other Factors Effecting Earnings
      Interest income for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was $15.0 million, an increase of $7.9 million as compared to $7.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was attributable to an increase in interest rates and the increase in invested cash and cash equivalent balances, primarily from our borrowings under the Macao Credit Facility.
      Our effective income tax rate for the three months ended June 30, 2006 was 6.3%. The effective tax rate for the 2006 period was significantly lower than the United States federal statutory rate due primarily to a zero effective tax rate on our Macao net income as a result of an income tax holiday in Macao on gaming operations, which is set to expire at the end of 2008. The effective income tax rate was 11.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2005. The income tax rate was lower in the current quarter compared to the prior year quarter, primarily as a result of an increase in the mix of Macao income compared to US income.
37
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 compared to the Six Months Ended June 30, 2005
Operating Revenues
      Our net revenues consisted of the following:

Six Months Ended June 30,

Percent
2006 2005 Change

(In thousands, except for percentages)
Net Revenues

Casino $ 753,844 $ 540,594 39.4 %
Rooms 180,792 170,060 6.3 %
Food and beverage 95,839 78,187 22.6 %
Convention, retail and other 64,281 52,808 21.7 %

1,094,756 841,649 30.1 %
Less — promotional allowances (47,385 ) (39,034 ) -21.4 %

Total net revenues $ 1,047,371 $ 802,615 30.5 %

      Consolidated net revenues were $1.05 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $244.8 million compared to $802.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase in net revenues was due primarily to an increase in casino revenue of $213.2 million. This increase is primarily attributable to the growth of our casino operations at The Sands Macao and the formal introduction of our Rolling Chip program in March 2005.
      Casino revenues were $753.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $213.2 million as compared to $540.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. Of the increase, $213.3 million was attributable to the growth of our casino operations at The Sands Macao and the formal introduction of our Rolling Chip program in March 2005. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, table games drop (the Non-Rolling chip portion) at The Sands Macao increased $171.4 million to $2.10 billion and the related win percentage increased 3.1 percentage points to 18.6% as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005. In addition, the Rolling Chip volume increased $5.11 billion to $7.96 billion and the related win percentage increased from 2.5% to 2.8% as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, The Venetian’s casino revenues decreased $0.1 million to $168.5 million. Table games drop increased $55.3 million to $617.7 million; however, the related win percentage dropped 1.2 percentage points to 20.3% as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005. Slot handle at The Venetian increased from $1.00 billion to $1.05 billion; however, the related win percentage decreased from 6.5% to 6.3% as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005. In our experience, average win percentages remain steady when measured over extended periods of time, but can vary considerably within shorter time periods as a result of the statistical variances that are associated with games of chance in which large amounts are wagered.
      Room revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $180.8 million, an increase of $10.7 million as compared to $170.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was attributable to the increase in average daily room rate from $237 for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to $246 for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as well as an increase in occupancy rate from 98.3% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 to 99.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 at The Venetian. The Venetian generated revenue per available room of $245 for the six months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to $233 for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase in the average daily room rate was partially offset by an increased percentage of rooms being occupied by groups at a slightly lower rate, which was driven by our strategy to emphasize The Venetian as a destination for tradeshows and groups, including filling our new meeting room space with group business.
      Food and beverage revenues were $95.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $17.6 million as compared to $78.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily
38
attributable to food and beverage revenues at The Venetian, which increased $15.5 million due to increased hotel occupancy and banquet business at the property driven by our strategy discussed above.
      Convention, retail and other revenues were $64.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $11.5 million as compared to $52.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase is primarily attributable to $5.1 million of additional revenues from The Sands Expo Center resulting from our strategy discussed above and $3.8 million in revenues associated with the Blue Man Group performances, which began during the fourth quarter of 2005.
Operating Expenses
      The breakdown of operating expenses is as follows:

Six Months Ended June 30,

Percent
2006 2005 Change

(In thousands, except for percentages)
Operating Expenses

Casino $ 422,586 $ 278,499 51.7 %
Rooms 43,748 41,342 5.8 %
Food and beverage 46,871 38,844 20.7 %
Convention, retail and other 32,122 28,099 14.3 %
Provision for doubtful accounts 8,310 4,168 99.4 %
General and administrative 112,152 93,987 19.3 %
Corporate expense 25,205 17,502 44.0 %
Rental expense 7,510 7,387 1.7 %
Pre-opening expense 6,573 504 1,204.2 %
Development expense 17,029 10,737 58.6 %
Depreciation and amortization 49,433 41,062 20.4 %
Loss on disposal of assets 1,537 1,005 52.9 %

Total operating expenses $ 773,076 $ 563,136 37.3 %

      Operating expenses were $773.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $210.0 million as compared to $563.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to the higher operating revenues and growth of our operating businesses in Macao and to a lesser extent in Las Vegas, as more fully described below:
      Casino department expenses were $422.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $144.1 million as compared to $278.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily attributable to the additional casino expenses related to the growth of our operations at The Sands Macao and increased slot machine and table games volume at The Venetian. Of the $144.1 million increase in casino expenses, $99.7 million was due to the 39.0% gross win tax on casino revenues in Macao. Despite the higher gross win tax, casino operating margins at The Sands Macao are similar to those at The Venetian primarily because of lower labor, marketing and sales expenses in Macao. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, casino expenses at The Venetian were higher than in the prior year due to higher payroll and related benefit costs, resulting from increased headcount associated with our targeted investments at the property, which include the poker room and the Blue Man and Phantom of the Opera productions, and a spike in high dollar medical claims during the six months ended June 30, 2006. Food and beverage expense increased $8.0 million, primarily related to the increased food and beverage revenue noted above.
      The provision for doubtful accounts was $8.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, compared to $4.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The prior year amount includes a $1.8 million recovery that did not occur during the three months ended June 30, 2006. The amount of this provision can vary over
39
short periods of time because of factors specific to the customers who owe us money from gaming activities at any given time. We believe that the amount of our provision for doubtful accounts in the future will depend upon the state of the economy, our credit standards, our risk assessments and the judgment of our employees responsible for granting credit.
      General and administrative expenses were $112.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of $18.2 million as compared to $94.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was attributable to the growth of our operating businesses in Las Vegas and Macao as discussed in the casino section above.
      Corporate expense for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $25.2 million, an increase of $7.7 million as compared to $17.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily attributable to $9.3 million of corporate general and administrative costs as we increase our headcount in the corporate area to support our continued expansion activities, $1.3 million related to stock offering costs associated with a sale by certain trusts established for the benefit of our principal stockholder and his family in a secondary public offering of stock in March 2006 and ~~$1.1~~$2.1 million related to stock-based compensation recorded in connection
28
~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~
~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~
with the adoption of SFAS No. 123R, partially offset by a $5.0 million charitable contribution that was made in the first quarter of 2005 that did not recur in 2006.
Pre-opening and development expenses were ~~$2.2~~$6.6 million and ~~$9.2~~$17.0 million, respectively, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, compared to ~~$0.0~~$0.5 million and ~~$5.2~~$10.7 million, respectively, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. Pre-opening expenses for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 were primarily related to The Venetian Macao project and the ~~opening~~expansion of ~~the poker room at~~ The ~~Venetian.~~Sands Macao. We expect that pre-opening expense will increase as The Venetian Macao and The Palazzo projects approach their anticipated 2007 opening dates. The increase in development expenses was primarily related to our increased activities in Singapore, Macao, Pennsylvania, and ~~Pennsylvania.~~Europe.
Depreciation and amortization expense for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 was ~~$25.0~~$49.4 million, an increase of ~~$5.0~~$8.4 million as compared to ~~$20.0~~$41.0 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The increase was primarily the result of placing into service various assets at The Venetian since the ~~first~~second quarter of 2005, including the Blue Man Group Theater, new meeting rooms and the renovation of the pool deck.
~~Interest Expense~~
Interest Expense
The following table summarizes information related to interest expense on long-term debt:

Six Months Ended June 30,

2006 2005

(In thousands, except
for percentages)
Interest cost $ 74,313 $ 54,189
Less: Capitalized interest (29,213 ) (9,137 )

Interest expense, net $ 45,100 $ 45,052

Cash paid for interest $ 69,725 $ 51,494
Average total debt balance $ 1,978,690 $ 1,563,938
Weighted average interest rate 7.5 % 5.2 %

Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands, except for percentages)
2006 2005
Interest cost $ 29,728 $ 31,188
Less: Capitalized interest (8,313 ) (4,105 )

Interest expense, net $ 21,415 $ 27,083

Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized $ 31,905 $ 33,139
Average total debt balance $ 1,652,519 $ 1,625,309
Weighted average interest rate 7.1 % 7.7 %
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized, was ~~$21.4~~$45.1 million for each of the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 ~~a decrease of $5.7 million~~and June 30, 2005. Interest expense increased during the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to ~~$27.1 million for~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31, 2005.~~June 30, 2005 due to an increase in interest rates and an increase in our average long-term debt balances resulting primarily from the completion of the $2.50 billion Macao credit facility, in late May 2006, to support our expansion activities in Macao. We expect that the interest expense amount will continue to increase as our long-term debt balances and interest rates increase. This decrease is primarily attributable to the redemption of our subsidiaries’ 11% mortgage notes, which were replaced during the quarter ended March 31, 2005 with a combination of senior notes bearing interest at a rate of 6.375% and lower cost bank debt, and the redemption of Venetian Macau Limited’s $120.0 million floating rate notes during the second quarter of 2005. The decreaseincrease was ~~also due to~~offset by the capitalization of ~~$8.3~~$29.2 million of interest during the first ~~quarter~~six months of 2006 compared to ~~$4.1~~$9.1 million of
40
capitalized interest in the first ~~quarter~~six months of 2005. We expect that the capitalized interest amount will continue to increase as The Venetian Macao and The Palazzo projects approach their 2007 opening dates.
Other Factors Effecting Earnings
Interest income for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 was ~~$10.2~~$25.2 million, an increase of ~~$2.8~~$10.7 million as compared to ~~$7.4~~$14.5 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. The increase was ~~primarily~~ attributable to ~~the~~an increase in interest rates ~~that~~and the ~~Company’s~~increase in invested cash and cash equivalent balances, ~~were earning as compared to~~primarily from our borrowings under the ~~first quarter of 2005.~~Macao Credit Facility.
~~The loss on early retirement of debt of $132.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was the result of the redemption and repurchase of our subsidiaries’ 11% mortgage notes.~~
Our effective income tax rate for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 was ~~11.7%~~9.2%. The effective income tax rate for the 2006 period was significantly lower than the United States federal statutory rate due primarily
29
~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~
~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~
to a zero effective tax rate on our Macao net income as a result of an income tax holiday in Macao on gaming operations, which is set to expire at the end of 2008. The effective tax rate was ~~- -126.2%~~-32.4% for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005 primarily due to the tax benefit associated with the loss on early retirement of debt in the 2005 period, as well as the application of the aforementioned Macao income tax holiday.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Cash Flows — Summary
~~Cash Flows~~—~~Summary~~
Our cash flows consisted of the following:

Six Months Ended June 30,

2006 2005

(In thousands)
Net cash provided by operations $ 97,181 $ 283,527

Investing cash flows:
Capital expenditures (730,475 ) (373,565 )
Change in restricted cash (1,034,881 ) (5,181 )

Net cash used in investing activities (1,765,356 ) (378,746 )

Financing cash flows:
Dividends to shareholders — (21,052 )
Repayments of long-term debt (79,607 ) (966,688 )
Proceeds of long term-debt 1,609,204 563,222
Other (37,244 ) (124,967 )

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 1,492,353 (549,485 )

Effect of exchange rate on cash 975 —

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents $ (174,847 ) $ (644,704 )

Three Months Ended March 31,
(in thousands)
2006 2005
Net cash provided by operations $ 145,826 $ 79,123

Investing cash flows:
Capital expenditures (294,233 ) (152,164 )
Change in restricted cash (47,786 ) (4,481 )

Net cash used in investing activities (342,019 ) (156,645 )

Financing cash flows:
Dividends to shareholders — (21,052 )
Repayments of long-term debt (52,151 ) (844,974 )
Proceeds of long term-debt 106,204 552,754
Other 2,496 (104,493 )

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 56,549 (417,765 )

Effect of exchange rate on cash 75 —

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents $ (139,569 ) $ (495,287 )

Cash Flows — Operating Activities
~~Cash Flows — Operating Activities~~
The Venetian’s slot machine and retail hotel rooms businesses are generally conducted on a cash basis, its table games and group hotel businesses are conducted on a cash and credit basis and its banquet business is conducted primarily on a credit basis resulting in operating cash flows being generally affected by changes in operating income and accounts receivables. The Sands Macao table games and slot machine play is currently conducted primarily on a cash basis. ~~As of March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we held unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $317.2 million and $456.8 million, respectively.~~ Net cash provided by operating activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 was ~~$145.8~~$97.2 million, ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$66.7~~$186.3 million as compared with ~~$79.1~~$283.5 million for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2005. ~~Factors~~The main factor contributing to the ~~increase~~decrease in cash ~~flow~~flows provided by operating activities ~~were primarily an~~was a significant increase in prepaid expenses and other assets, primarily as a result of payments made to the ~~operating results at The~~Singapore government for deposits on the Marina Bay Sands ~~Macao and certain positive changes~~development project in ~~our working capital assets and liabilities.~~Singapore.
30
41
Cash Flows — Investing Activities
~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~
~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~
~~Cash Flows — Investing Activities~~
Capital expenditures for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 totaled ~~$294.2~~$730.5 million, including ~~$22.7~~$58.7 million on expansions, improvements and maintenance capital expenditures at The Venetian and The Sands Expo Center in Las Vegas; ~~$196.0~~$468.1 million for construction and development activities in Macao (including The Sands Macao and The Venetian Macao on the Cotai Strip); and ~~$75.5~~$203.7 million for The Palazzo.
Restricted cash increased ~~$47.8 million~~$1.03 billion for the six months ended June 30, 2006, primarily as a result of ~~depositing $37.0~~adding $984.2 million in anet restricted ~~account as part of~~cash and cash equivalents from the ~~Company’s application~~Macao Credit Facility to be used for ~~a gaming license in Singapore.~~Macao related construction.
~~Cash Flows — Financing Activities~~
Cash Flows — Financing Activities
For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, net cash flows provided from financing activities were ~~$56.5 million.~~$1.49 billion. The net increase was primarily attributable to the borrowing of ~~$92.1~~$1.33 billion under the Macao credit facility, $229.1 million from the senior secured revolving facility and ~~$14.0~~$30.0 million from the Phase II Mall Construction Loan, offset by the repayment of the $50.0 million credit facility of Venetian Venture Development Intermediate ~~credit facility.~~Limited.
Capital and Liquidity

As of June 30, 2006 and ~~Liquidity~~

December 31, 2005, we held unrestricted cash and cash equivalents of $282.0 million and $456.8 million, respectively. We expect to fund our operations, capital expenditures at The Venetian, The Sands Expo Center and The Sands Macao (other than The Sands Macao expansion ~~construction, The Palazzo, the Phase II mall, The Venetian Macao, our other Cotai Strip developments and related Cotai Strip infrastructure development and construction costs)~~construction) and debt service requirements from existing cash balances, operating cash flow and borrowings under our Las Vegas and Macao revolving credit ~~facility.~~facilities. We have a $450.0 million senior secured revolving credit facility in Las Vegas and a senior secured $500.0 million revolving credit facility in Macao for working capital needs, of which ~~$326.9~~$189.9 million ~~was~~and $475.0 million, respectively, were available as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006.

We have commenced construction of The Palazzo and plan to continue work on The Palazzo during 2006. We currently estimate that construction will be completed in the fall of 2007 and that our cost to develop and construct The Palazzo could reach as high as approximately $1.8 billion (exclusive of land), of which the Phase II mall is expected to cost approximately $280.0 million (exclusive of certain incentive payments to executives made in July 2004). In addition, we expect that tenants will make significant additional capital expenditures to build out stores and restaurants located in The Palazzo. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, we had paid ~~$581.5~~$710.1 million in design, development and construction costs for The Palazzo. We intend to use $361.8 million (plus the interest earnings) of the proceeds from the $970.0 million Term B Facility and $200.0 million from the Term B Delayed Draw Facility from the Senior Secured Credit Facility, ~~$221.5~~$191.5 million of proceeds from the Phase II Mall Construction Loan, cash on hand, borrowings under the Revolving Facility under the Senior Secured Credit Facility and operating cash flow to fund the development and construction costs for The Palazzo (including the Phase II mall) and to pay related fees and expenses.

We currently estimate that the cost for The Venetian Macao will be approximately $2.3 billion (exclusive of land) and that we will need to arrange additional debt financing to finance these costs. We have not yet finalized our estimate On May 25, 2006, two subsidiaries of the ~~cost of our other Cotai Strip developments. We are in the process of obtaining~~Company, VML US Finance LLC (the “Borrower”) and Venetian Macau Limited, as guarantor, entered into a ~~new $2.5 billion senior secured~~ credit ~~facility~~agreement (the “Macao Credit Facility”) for the ~~partial~~ funding of The Sands Macao expansion, and partial funding for the construction of The Venetian Macao and some ~~of our~~ other Cotai Strip developments. The ~~documentation for~~Macao Credit Facility consists of a $1.20 billion funded term B loan (the “Macao Term B Facility”), a $700.0 million delayed draw term B loan (the “Macao Term B Delayed Draw Facility”), a $100.0 million local currency term loan (the “Macao Local Term Facility”) and a $500.0 million revolving credit facility (the “Macao Revolving Facility”). As of June 30, 2006, $1.3 billion has been drawn under the ~~new facility is being finalized~~Macao Term B Facility and the ~~potential lenders are not yet legally committed to lend~~Macao Local Term Facility and $25.0 million has been drawn under the ~~funds. The credit facility is expected to close in May~~Macao Revolving Facility. No amounts have been drawn under the Macao Term B Delayed Draw Facility as of June 30, 2006. In addition, all of The Sands Macao’s cash flows are expected to be used to finance a portion of the construction of The Venetian Macao and certain other Macao developments. ~~Therefore,~~

We currently estimate that the cost of developing and building The Venetian Macao will be approximately $2.3 billion (exclusive of land); however, we ~~may need~~have not yet finalized our estimate of the costs of our other Cotai Strip developments. We will have to incur additional debt to finance The Venetian Macao, ~~and~~ other Macao developments and our Cotai Strip developments if The Sands Macao’s cash flows, existing cash balances, and available borrowings are not sufficient. ~~We also expect that our other Cotai Strip developments~~Under the Macao credit facility, the Company is required to secure the land concession in order to fully draw against the facility. If we are unable to complete The Venetian Macao land concession negotiations within a specified period of time, we will not be able to draw any further funds from the Macao credit facility in order to fund construction activities and we will have to seek additional financing.

In May 2006, the Company was selected by the Singapore government to build and operate the Marina Bay Integrated Resort (IR) in Singapore, which will be ~~financed~~a large integrated resort, including a casino. As a result of being selected to build the project, the Company is required to pay the Singapore government $1.20 billion Singapore dollars (approximately $751.1 million at exchange rates in ~~large part by additional debt.~~effect on June 30, 2006) in premiums for use of the land where the resort will be built and $298.2 million Singapore dollars (approximately $186.7 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2006) for various taxes and other fees. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had paid $300.0 million Singapore dollars (approximately $187.8 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2006) related to the land premium payments. The remaining amount of $1.20 billion Singapore dollars (approximately $751.1 million at exchange rates in effect on June 30, 2006) is due on August 24, 2006. The Company is currently in the process of obtaining bridge financing to cover the above payments as well as the initial development costs for the project.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any transactions with special purpose entities, nor have we engaged in any derivative transactions other than ~~straightforward~~simple interest rate caps. During 1997, we entered into ~~off-balance sheet~~operating lease arrangements with the HVAC provider. Under the terms of these energy service agreements, we will purchase HVAC energy and services over initial terms expiring in 2009 with an

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~

option to collectively extend the terms of these agreements for two consecutive five-year periods. We have fixed payment obligations due during the next twelve months of $6.8 million under the energy services agreements with the HVAC provider. The total remaining payment obligations under these arrangements was ~~$22.2~~$20.5 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, payable in equal monthly installments through July 1, 2009. We have the right to terminate the agreement based upon the failure of the HVAC provider to provide HVAC services. Upon the sale of The Grand Canal Shops mall on May 17, 2004, GGP assumed the responsibility for $1.6 million of annual payments to the HVAC provider. We have no other off-balance sheet arrangements.

Restrictions on Distributions

We are a parent company with limited business operations. Our main asset is the stock and membership interests of our subsidiaries. The debt instruments of Las Vegas Sands, LLC contain significant restrictions on the payment of dividends and distributions to us by Las Vegas Sands, LLC. In particular, the Senior Secured Credit Facility prohibits Las Vegas Sands, LLC from paying dividends or making distributions to us, or investing in us, with limited exceptions. Las Vegas Sands, LLC may ~~distribute~~make certain distributions to us up to cover taxes and certain reasonable and customary operating costs. In addition, Las Vegas Sands, LLC may make distributions to us in order to enable us to pay dividends on our common stock so long as construction of The Palazzo is substantially complete and certain financial leverage tests are satisfied, which distributions may not exceed $25.0 million or $50.0 million ~~in dividend payments in a~~during any twelve-month period ~~after the substantial completion of The Palazzo,~~ depending on ~~whether certain~~our financial ~~tests are met.~~leverage ratio at the time of such distributions.

In addition, the debt instrument of our subsidiary, Phase II Mall Subsidiary, LLC (the “Phase II Mall Subsidiary”), also restricts the payment of dividends and distributions to us. Subject to limited exceptions, the Phase II Mall Construction Loan prohibits the Phase II Mall Subsidiary from paying dividends or making distributions to us, or making investments in us, other than tax distributions and a limited basket amount.

The debt instruments of our subsidiaries, ~~also contain, and~~including the ~~proposed~~ new Macao credit facility for the construction of The Venetian Macao ~~is expected to~~ contain certain restrictions that, among other things, limit the ability of our company and/or certain subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, issue disqualified stock or equity interests, pay dividends or make other distributions, repurchase equity interests or certain indebtedness, create certain liens, enter into certain transactions with affiliates, enter into certain mergers or consolidations or sell our assets of our company without prior approval of the lenders or noteholders. Financial covenants included in our Senior Secured Credit Facility and our Macao credit facility include a minimum interest coverage ratio, a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum net worth covenant and maximum capital expenditure limitations.

Inflation

We believe that inflation and changing prices have not had a material impact on our net sales, revenues or income from continuing operations during the past year.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This report contains forward-looking statements that are made pursuant to the Safe Harbor Provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements include the discussions of our business strategies and expectations concerning future operations, margins, profitability, liquidity, and capital resources. In addition, in certain portions included in this report, the words: “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “seeks,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends” and similar expressions, as they relate to our company or its management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we believe that these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot assure you that any forward-looking statements will prove to be correct. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others, the risks associated with:


	•		general economic and business conditions which may impact levels of disposable income, consumer spending and pricing of hotel rooms;

	•		the uncertainty of tourist behavior related to spending and vacationing at casino resorts in Las Vegas and Macao;

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~ITEM 2 — MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued)~~


	•		disruptions or reductions in travel due to conflicts with Iraq and any future terrorist incidents;

	•		outbreaks of infectious diseases, such as severe acute respiratory syndrome or avian flu, in our market areas;

	•		our dependence upon three properties in two markets for all of our cash flow;

	•		new developments, construction and ventures, including The Palazzo, The Venetian Macao and other Cotai Strip ~~developments;~~developments, and the development in Singapore;

	•		the passage of new legislation and receipt of governmental approvals for our proposed developments in Macao, Singapore, the United Kingdom and other jurisdictions where we are planning to operate;

	•		our substantial leverage and debt service (including sensitivity to fluctuations in interest rates and other capital markets trends);

	•		our insurance coverage, including the risk that we have not obtained sufficient coverage against acts of terrorism or will only be able to obtain additional coverage at significantly increased rates;

	•		government regulation of the casino industry, including gaming license regulation, the legalization of gaming in certain domestic jurisdictions, including Native American reservations, and regulation of gaming on the Internet;

	•		increased competition and additional construction in Las Vegas, including recent and upcoming increases in hotel rooms, meeting and convention space and retail space;


	•		fluctuations in the demand for all-suites rooms, occupancy rates and average daily room rates in Las Vegas;

	•		the popularity of Las Vegas as a convention and trade show destination;

	•		new taxes or changes to existing tax rates;

	•		our ability to meet certain development deadlines in ~~Macao;~~Macao and Singapore;

	•		our ability to maintain our gaming subconcession in Macao;

	•		the completion of infrastructure projects in Macao;

	•		increased competition and other planned construction projects in Macao; and

	•		any future litigation.

All future written and verbal forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. New risks and uncertainties arise from time to time, and it is impossible for us to predict these events or how they may affect us. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We assume no obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this report as a result of new information, future events or developments, except as required by federal securities laws.

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~ITEM~~Item 3 — ~~QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices, such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates and commodity prices. Our primary exposure to market risk is interest rate risk associated with our long-term debt. We attempt to manage our interest rate risk by managing the mix of our long-term fixed-rate borrowings and variable rate borrowings, and by use of interest rate cap agreements. The ability to enter into interest rate cap agreements allows us to manage our interest rate risk associated with our variable rate debt. We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes and do not enter into derivative transactions that would be considered speculative positions. Our derivative financial instruments consist exclusively of interest rate cap agreements, which do not qualify for hedge accounting. Interest differentials resulting from these agreements are recorded on an accrual basis as an adjustment to interest expense.

To manage exposure to counterparty credit risk in interest rate cap agreements, we enter into agreements with highly rated institutions that can be expected to fully perform under the terms of such agreements. Frequently, these institutions are also members of the bank group providing our credit facilities, which management believes further minimizes the risk of nonperformance.

The table below provides information about our financial instruments that are sensitive to changes in interest rates. For debt obligations, the table presents notional amounts and weighted average interest rates by contractual maturity dates for the years ending ~~March 31:~~June 30:

Fair
2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Thereafter Total Value(1)
(dollars in millions)
LIABILITIES

Short-term debt

Variable rate $ 7.5 — — — — — $ 7.5 $ 7.5
Average interest rate (2) 8.5 % — — — — — 8.5 % 8.5 %
Long-term debt

Fixed rate — — — — — $ 250.0 $ 250.0 $ 241.9
Average interest rate (2) — — — — — 6.4 % 6.4 % 6.4 %
Variable rate — $ 140.2 $ 15.9 $ 134.9 $ 856.3 $ 284.5 $ 1,431.8 $ 1,431.8
Average interest rate (2) — 8.1 % 7.1 % 6.8 % 6.8 % 6.8 % 6.9 % 6.9 %
Cap Agreement (3)
— — — 0.8 — — 0.8 0.8
Average interest rate — — — — — — — —


																						Fair
	2007			2008			2009			2010			2011			Thereafter			Total			Value(1)

	(Dollars in millions)
LIABILITIES
Short-term debt
Variable rate	$	6.1			—			—			—			—			—		$	6.1		$	7.5
Average interest rate(2)		9.0	%		—			—			—			—			—			9.0	%		8.5	%
Long-term debt
Fixed rate		—			—			—			—			—		$	250.0		$	250.0		$	233.8
Average interest rate(2)		—			—			—			—			—			6.4	%		6.4	%		6.4	%
Variable rate		—		$	158.2		$	52.9		$	308.9		$	1,224.8		$	1,164.0		$	2,908.8		$	2,908.8
Average interest rate(2)		—			8.4	%		7.6	%		7.3	%		7.3	%		8.3	%		7.7	%		7.7	%
Cap Agreement(3)		—			—			—		$	1.1			—			—		$	1.1		$	1.1
Average interest rate		—			—			—			—			—			—			—			—


1.		The fair values are based on the borrowing rates currently available for debt instruments with similar terms and maturities and market quotes of our publicly traded debt.

2.		Based upon contractual interest rates for fixed rate indebtedness or current LIBOR rates for variable rate indebtedness.

3.		As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, we have ~~three~~four interest rate cap agreements with a fair value of ~~$0.8~~$1.1 million based on a quoted market value from the institution holding the agreement.

Borrowings under the Senior Secured Credit Facility bear interest at our election at either LIBOR plus 1.75% or the base rate plus 0.75% per annum, subject to downward adjustments based upon our credit rating. Borrowings under the $250.0 million Phase II Mall Construction Loan facility bear interest at our election at either a base rate plus 0.75% per annum or at LIBOR plus 1.75% per annum. Borrowings under the Interface Mortgage Loan bear interest at an interest rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.75%. Borrowings under the Macao Credit facility bear interest at our election, at either an adjusted Eurodollar rate (or in the case of the Local Term Loan, adjusted HIBOR) plus 2.75% per annum or at an alternative base rate plus 1.75% per annum, and is subject to a downward adjustment of 0.25% per annum from the beginning of the first interest period following the substantial completion of the Venetian Macao.

Foreign currency transaction gains and losses were not material to our results of operations for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006, but may be in future periods in relation to activity associated with our Macao subsidiaries. We do not hedge our exposure to foreign currency; however, we maintain a significant amount of our operating funds in the same currencies in which we have obligations thereby reducing our exposure to currency fluctuations.

See also “Liquidity and Capital Resources”.

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~ITEM~~Item 4—~~CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES~~Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Rules 13a-15(e) and15d-15(e)) of the Company as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2006 and have concluded that they are ~~effective.~~effective to provide reasonable assurance that the desired control objectives were achieved.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

Part II

OTHER INFORMATION

~~ITEM~~Item 1—~~LEGAL PROCEEDINGS~~Legal Proceedings

The Company is party to litigation matters and claims related to its operations. For more information, see the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 and “Part I –— Item 1 –— Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements –— Note 6 –— Commitments and Contingencies” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

~~ITEM~~Item 1A—~~RISK FACTORS~~Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

~~ITEM~~Item 2—~~UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Uses of Proceeds from Registered Securities

On December 20, 2004, we issued all of the 27,380,953 shares of our common stock we registered in an initial public offering at an offering price of $29.00 per share (Reg. No. 333-118827), effective December 14, 2004. The aggregate offering price of the common stock sold (including the exercise by the managing underwriters of their over-allotment option) resulted in gross proceeds of $794.0 million and net proceeds of approximately $738.7 million to us after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of $49.6 million and related offering expenses of $5.7 million none of which was paid to the underwriters. The managing underwriters for the offering were Goldman, Sachs & Co., Citigroup, JP Morgan, Lehman Brothers, Merrill Lynch & Co, UBS Investment Bank, and Jeffries & Company, Inc. None of the expenses we incurred in connection with the offering were direct or indirect payments to our directors, officers, general partners or their associates, to persons owning 10% or more of our equity securities or to our affiliates (collectively “Related Parties”).

During the first quarter of 2005, we used $327.3 million of the approximately $738.7 million in net proceeds from our initial public offering to redeem approximately $291.1 million in principal amount of the 11% mortgage notes issued by Las Vegas Sands, Inc. and Venetian Casino Resort, LLC and to pay $36.2 million in related premiums and accrued interest and expenses. During the second quarter of 2005, we used $70.0 million of the net proceeds to redeem the VML senior secured notes. None of the amounts paid to redeem the 11% mortgage notes or the VML senior secured notes were paid to Related Parties. In addition, during 2005, we used approximately $149.4 million (net of interest income) of the net proceeds for other general corporate purposes. During the first quarter of 2006, we used approximately $128.0 million of the net proceeds for other general corporate purposes, including an amount for a gaming license, which is recoverable

if the license is not awarded.

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~ During the second quarter of 2006, we used approximately $64.0 million of the net proceeds for other general corporate purposes, including an amount for a deposit on our development project in Singapore, which will be reimbursed when financing is obtained for the project. As of June 30, 2006, all of the net proceeds from the initial public offering had been used.

~~ITEM 6~~Item 4 —~~EXHIBITS~~Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The Company’s annual meeting of stockholders was held on June 7, 2006. At the annual meeting, votes were taken for: (1) the election of directors and (2) the ratification of the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The Company’s stockholders elected William P. Weidner and Michael A. Leven to serve on the Board of Directors as Class II directors for three-year terms, which will expire in 2009. The service of Charles D. Forman and Irwin A. Siegel as Class I directors and Sheldon G. Adelson, Irwin A. Chafetz and James L. Purcell as Class III directors continued after the meeting. Stockholders also ratified the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm.

The following tables provide details regarding the number of votes cast by the Company’s stockholders with respect to each of the matters indicated above.

Election of directors:


Nominees for Director	Votes For		Votes Withheld

William P. Weidner		322,274,733		22,449,967
Michael A. Leven		338,857,296		5,867,404

Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm:


Votes For		Votes Against		Abstentions		Broker Non-Votes

	344,655,041		47,743		21,915		0

Item 6 —Exhibits

List of Exhibits


Exhibit No.			Description of Document

	10.1		Credit Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2006, by and among VML US Finance LLC, Venetian Macau Limited, the financial institutions listed therein as lenders, The Bank of Nova Scotia, Banco Nacional Ultramarino, S.A., Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., Lehman Brothers Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.

	10.2		Disbursement Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2006, by and among VML US Finance LLC, Venetian Cotai Limited, Venetian Macau Limited and The Bank of Nova Scotia.

	10.3		Employment Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2006, among Las Vegas Sands Corp., Las Vegas Sands, LLC and Robert Rozek.

	10.4		Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 20, 2006 and effective as of June 8, 2006, to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2004, among Las Vegas Sands Corp., Las Vegas Sands, LLC and Scott D. Henry.

	31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	31.2
~~31.2~~		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.1
~~32.1~~		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Las Vegas Sands Corp. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.2
~~32.2~~		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Las Vegas Sands Corp. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.


	By:	/s/ Sheldon G. Adelson



		~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

~~May 10, 2006~~		~~By:~~	~~/s/ Sheldon G. Adelson~~ Sheldon G. Adelson
			Chairman of the Board and
	Chief Executive Officer

August 9, 2006


	By:	/s/ Robert P. Rozek



		~~Chief Executive Officer~~	Robert P. Rozek

~~May 10, 2006~~	~~By:~~	~~/s/ Scott Henry~~

		~~Scott Henry~~
		Senior Vice President and
		Chief Financial Officer

August 9, 2006

~~LAS VEGAS SANDS CORP.~~

EXHIBIT INDEX


Exhibit No.			Description of Document

	10.1		Credit Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2006, by and among VML US Finance LLC, Venetian Macau Limited, the financial institutions listed therein as lenders, The Bank of Nova Scotia, Banco Nacional Ultramarino, S.A., Sumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation, Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., Lehman Brothers Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.

	10.2		Disbursement Agreement, dated as of May 25, 2006, by and among VML US Finance LLC, Venetian Cotai Limited, Venetian Macau Limited and The Bank of Nova Scotia.

	10.3		Employment Agreement, dated as of June 1, 2006, among Las Vegas Sands Corp., Las Vegas Sands, LLC and Robert Rozek.

	10.4		Amendment No. 1, dated as of June 20, 2006 and effective as of June 8, 2006, to Employment Agreement, dated as of November 18, 2004, among Las Vegas Sands Corp., Las Vegas Sands, LLC and Scott D. Henry.

	31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	31.2
~~31.2~~		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.1
~~32.1~~		Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Las Vegas Sands Corp. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.2
~~32.2~~		Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Las Vegas Sands Corp. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2005
Net income, as reported	$	7,112
Less: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the Black Scholes option-pricing model, net of tax		(806	)

Pro forma net income	$	6,306

Basic earnings per share, as reported	$	0.02

Basic earnings per share, pro-forma	$	0.02

Diluted earnings per share, as reported	$	0.02

Diluted earnings per share, pro-forma	$	0.02


	March 31,		December 31,
	2006		2005
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	317,277	$	456,846
Restricted cash and cash equivalents		113,221		71,717
Accounts receivable, net		108,450		84,778
Inventories		10,645		9,967
Deferred income taxes		10,363		7,946
Prepaid expenses and other		18,175		13,452


Total current assets		578,131		644,706

Property and equipment, net		2,887,413		2,600,468
Deferred offering costs, net		28,956		30,973
Restricted cash and cash equivalents		577,425		571,143
Deferred income taxes		2,064		11,332
Other assets, net		23,345		21,117


	$	4,097,334	$	3,879,739


LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	44,259	$	34,803
Construction payables		182,750		163,932
Accrued interest payable		3,277		7,918
Other accrued liabilities		249,953		246,390
Income taxes payable		8,200		—
Current maturities of long-term debt		7,490		7,325


Total current liabilities		495,929		460,368

Other long-term liabilities		11,775		9,804
Deferred gain on sale of The Grand Canal Shops mall		67,263		68,129
Deferred rent from The Grand Canal Shops mall transaction		105,693		105,999
Long-term debt		1,679,846		1,625,901


		2,360,506		2,270,201


Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)

Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock, $.001 par value, 1,000,000,000 shares authorized, 354,317,234 and 354,179,580 shares issued and outstanding		354		354
Capital in excess of par value		970,305		964,660
Deferred compensation		—		(150	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		1,438		1,726
Retained earnings		764,731		642,948


		1,736,828		1,609,538


Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4,097,334	$	3,879,739


	Three Months Ended			Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2006			March 31, 2005
Weighted average volatility		31.61	%		35.29	%
Expected term (in years)		6.0			6.0
Risk-free rate		4.40	%		3.86	%
Expected dividends		—			—


	Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2005			June 30, 2005

Net income, as reported	$	86,429		$	93,541
Less: Stock-based employee compensation expense determined under the Black Scholes option-pricing model, net of tax		(818	)		(1,624	)

Pro forma net income	$	85,611		$	91,917

Basic earnings per share, as reported	$	0.24		$	0.26

Basic earnings per share, pro-forma	$	0.24		$	0.26

Diluted earnings per share, as reported	$	0.24		$	0.26

Diluted earnings per share, pro-forma	$	0.24		$	0.26


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2006			2005
Net Revenues
The Venetian	$	226,640		$	209,905
The Sands Macao		281,637			175,056
The Sands Expo Center		22,087			18,833


Total net revenues	$	530,364		$	403,794


Adjusted EBITDA⁽¹⁾
The Venetian	$	87,704		$	87,206
The Sands Macao		102,686			67,602
The Sands Expo Center		8,917			7,713

Total segment adjusted EBITDA		199,307			162,521


Other Operating Costs and Expenses
Corporate expense		(12,954	)		(10,882	)
Depreciation and amortization		(25,005	)		(19,965	)
Loss on disposal of assets		(1,081	)		(1,163	)
Pre-opening expense		(2,219	)		—
Development expense		(9,168	)		(5,175	)


Operating income		148,880			125,336

Other Non-Operating Costs and Expenses
Interest income		10,214			7,394
Interest expense, net of amounts capitalized		(21,415	)		(27,083	)
Other income		164			—
Loss on early retirement of debt		—			(132,834	)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		(16,060	)		34,299


Net income	$	121,783		$	7,112


		entered into a non-binding agreements with Hilton Hotels and Fairmont Raffles to manage the hotel complexes under their respective brands.

	•	We have signed a non-binding memorandum of agreement with an independent developer for another Cotai Strip Development. We are currently negotiating definitive agreements pursuant to which we plan to partner with this developer to build a multi-hotel complex under several hotel brands.


	*Other Development Projects* Following the Singapore government’s adoption of gaming legislation in 2005, we submitted a proposal to the Singapore government for a license to develop a large integrated resort, including a casino, in Singapore. There are currently three competing proposals for this resort/casino license. The Singapore government is expected to award this license in mid-2006.


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	(in thousands, except for percentages)
						Percent
	2006		2005			Change
Net revenues	$	530,364	$	403,794			31.3	%
Operating expenses		381,484		278,458			37.0	%
Operating income		148,880		125,336			18.8	%
Income (loss) before income taxes		137,843		(27,187	)		607.0	%
Net income		121,783		7,112			1,612.4	%


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Percent of Net Revenues
	2006			2005
Operating expenses		71.9	%		69.0	%
Operating income		28.0	%		31.0	%
Income (loss) before income taxes		26.0	%		-6.7	%
Net income		23.0	%		1.8	%


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
	June,				June,

	2006		2005		2006		2005

	Percent of Net				Percent of Net
	Revenues				Revenues
Operating expenses		75.7%		71.4%		73.8%		70.2%
Operating income		24.3%		28.6%		26.2%		29.8%
Income before income taxes		22.6%		24.5%		24.3%		8.8%
Net income		21.1%		21.7%		22.1%		11.7%


	negotiable gaming chips wagered. The volume measurement for Non-Rolling Chip play is table games drop as described above. Rolling Chip volume and Non-Rolling Chip volume are not equivalent because, since Rolling Chip volume is a measure of amounts wagered versus dropped, Rolling Chip volume is substantially higher than drop. Slot handle at The Sands Macao is the gross amount wagered or coins placed into slot machines in aggregate for the period cited.

	We view Rolling Chip table games win as a percentage of Rolling Chip volume and we view Non-Rolling Chip table games win as a percentage of drop. Win or hold percentage represents the percentage of Rolling Chip volume, Non-Rolling Chip drop or slot handle that is won by the casino and recorded as casino revenue. Based upon our mix of table games in Macao, our Rolling Chip table games win percentage (calculated before discounts and commissions) as measured as a percentage of Rolling Chip volume is expected to be 2.5% to 2.8% and our Non-Rolling Chip play table games are expected to produce a statistical average table win percentage as measured as a percentage of table game drop (before discounts and commissions) of 17.0% to 19.0%. Like in Las Vegas, our Macao slot machines produce a statistical average slot machine win percentage as measured as a percentage of slot machine handle of generally between 6.0% and 7.0%.


	Three Months Ended March 31,
	(in thousands)
	2006			2005
Net cash provided by operations	$	145,826		$	79,123


Investing cash flows:
Capital expenditures		(294,233	)		(152,164	)
Change in restricted cash		(47,786	)		(4,481	)


Net cash used in investing activities		(342,019	)		(156,645	)


Financing cash flows:
Dividends to shareholders		—			(21,052	)
Repayments of long-term debt		(52,151	)		(844,974	)
Proceeds of long term-debt		106,204			552,754
Other		2,496			(104,493	)


Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		56,549			(417,765	)


Effect of exchange rate on cash		75			—


Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(139,569	)	$	(495,287	)