Table of Contents


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x

Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020

Or

¨

Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ________ to ___________


Commission File No. 0-23047

SIGA Technologies, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

13-3864870

Delaware13-3864870

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

(IRS Employer Identification. No.)

incorporation or organization)

27

31 East 62nd Street

10065

New York, NY

(zip code)

(Address of principal executive offices)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 672-9100

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

common stock, $.0001 par value

SIGA

The Nasdaq Global Market



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨.

☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨.

☐.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitionthe definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”,filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer x

Non-accelerated filer ¨

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company ¨

Emerging growth company ¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No x.

☒.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes x No ¨.


☐.

As of NovemberMay 1, 20172020, the registrant had outstanding 78,908,92981,047,424 shares of common stock, par value $.0001, per shareshare.

SIGA

SIGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q


Table of Contents

Page No.

Page No.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION


Item 1 - Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

SIGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)

  

March 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

ASSETS

        

Current assets

        

Cash and cash equivalents

 $77,377,300  $65,249,072 

Restricted cash and cash equivalents, short-term

  -   95,737,862 

Accounts receivable

  1,685,642   4,167,996 

Inventory

  16,342,014   9,652,855 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  2,617,852   5,234,000 

Total current assets

  98,022,808   180,041,785 
         

Property, plant and equipment, net

  2,500,641   2,618,303 

Deferred tax assets, net

  16,304,697   14,151,002 

Goodwill

  898,334   898,334 

Other assets

  847,983   856,766 

Total assets

 $118,574,463  $198,566,190 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

        

Current liabilities

        

Accounts payable

 $4,765,817  $3,054,032 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

  16,658,698   8,636,911 
Total debt, current  -   80,044,866 

Total current liabilities

  21,424,515   91,735,809 

Warrant liability

  6,132,947   6,116,882 

Other liabilities

  2,874,879   2,929,743 

Total liabilities

  30,432,341   100,782,434 

Commitments and contingencies

        

Stockholders’ equity

        

Common stock ($.0001 par value, 600,000,000 shares authorized, 81,047,424 and 81,269,868 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively)

  8,105   8,127 

Additional paid-in capital

  221,057,307   220,808,037 

Accumulated deficit

  (132,923,290)  (123,032,408)

Total stockholders’ equity

  88,142,122   97,783,756 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 $118,574,463  $198,566,190 

 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
ASSETS   
Current assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$25,798,125
 $28,701,824
Restricted cash and cash equivalents, short-term10,408,810
 10,138,890
Accounts receivable612,166
 3,154,370
Inventory2,983,249
 26,209,964
Prepaid expenses and other current assets1,092,396
 954,426
Total current assets$40,894,746
 $69,159,474
    
Property, plant and equipment, net119,735
 299,477
Restricted cash and cash equivalents, long-term9,430,016
 17,333,332
Deferred costs96,741,244
 72,649,277
Goodwill898,334
 898,334
Other assets642,083
 642,083
Total assets$148,726,158
 $160,981,977
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIENCY   
Current liabilities   
Accounts payable$1,362,331
 $2,517,072
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities4,320,994
 4,584,752
Warrant liability7,355,033
 6,727,409
Total current liabilities13,038,358
 13,829,233
Deferred revenue377,447,093
 367,483,905
Deferred income tax liability, net306,449
 286,066
Other liabilities844,407
 247,989
Long-term debt69,916,765
 66,553,053
Total liabilities461,553,072
 448,400,246
     Commitments and Contingencies
 
Stockholders’ deficiency   
Common stock ($.0001 par value, 600,000,000 shares authorized, 78,908,929 and 78,692,612 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017, and December 31, 2016, respectively)7,890
 7,869
Additional paid-in capital214,238,249
 213,714,154
Accumulated deficit(527,073,053) (501,140,292)
Total stockholders’ deficiency(312,826,914) (287,418,269)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficiency$148,726,158
 $160,981,977

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


SIGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSSINCOME (LOSS) (UNAUDITED)

  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Revenues

        

Product sales and supportive services

 $113,009  $7,142,400 

Research and development

  2,506,756   3,316,684 

Total revenues

  2,619,765   10,459,084 
         

Operating expenses

        

Cost of sales and supportive services

  109,094   915,367 

Selling, general and administrative

  3,176,024   3,166,566 

Research and development

  3,150,105   3,997,281 

Patent expenses

  182,597   187,916 

Total operating expenses

  6,617,820   8,267,130 

Operating (loss) income

  (3,998,055)  2,191,954 

(Loss) gain from change in fair value of warrant liability

  (16,065)  3,136,265 
Loss on extinguishment of Term Loan  (4,981,461)  - 

Interest expense

  (3,016,817)  (3,928,418)

Other income, net

  412,363   736,129 

(Loss) income before income taxes

  (11,600,035)  2,135,930 

Benefit (provision) for income taxes

  2,702,506   (506,153)

Net and comprehensive (loss) income

 $(8,897,529) $1,629,777 

Basic (loss) income per share

 $(0.11) $0.02 

Diluted (loss) per share

 $(0.11)��$(0.02)

Weighted average shares outstanding: basic

  81,240,105   80,913,320 

Weighted average shares outstanding: diluted

  81,240,105   82,139,108 
 Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Revenues       
Research and development$1,390,254
 $4,658,355
 $10,856,601
 $7,829,402
        
Operating expenses       
Selling, general and administrative3,093,926
 2,855,255
 9,022,039
 9,276,507
Research and development2,470,835
 6,068,567
 13,899,162
 11,553,469
Patent expenses250,857
 230,246
 688,471
 689,651
Lease termination1,225,421
 
 1,225,421
 
Interest on PharmAthene liability
 3,566,451
 
 10,716,276
Total operating expenses7,041,039
 12,720,519
 24,835,093
 32,235,903
Operating loss(5,650,785) (8,062,164) (13,978,492) (24,406,501)
Interest expense(3,737,175) (94,776) (10,995,900) (104,991)
Loss from change in fair value of warrant liabilities(295,771) (1,121,530) (627,624) (1,121,530)
Other income, net2,021
 30,756
 11,818
 100,556
Reorganization items, net
 
 
 (3,716,902)
   Loss before income taxes(9,681,710) (9,247,714) (25,590,198) (29,249,368)
(Provision)/Benefit for income taxes(134,668) 4,072
 (342,563) (8,692)
Net and comprehensive loss$(9,816,378) $(9,243,642) $(25,932,761) $(29,258,060)
        
Loss per share: basic and diluted$(0.12) $(0.17) $(0.33) $(0.54)
Weighted average shares outstanding: basic and diluted78,908,929
 54,284,296
 78,842,611
 54,205,354

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


SIGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

        

Net (loss)/income

 $(8,897,529) $1,629,777 

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss)/income to net cash provided by operating activities:

        

Depreciation and other amortization

  133,163   137,724 

Loss/(gain) on change in fair value of warrant liability

  16,065   (3,136,265)

Stock-based compensation

  259,016   408,894 

Deferred income taxes, net

  (2,153,695)  505,678 
Loss on extinguishment of Term Loan  4,981,461   - 

Non-cash interest expense

  887,132   1,108,916 

Changes in assets and liabilities:

        

Accounts receivable

  2,482,354   (2,140,821)

Inventory

  (4,086,487)  891,133 

Prepaid expenses and other assets

  22,259   508,400 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities

  (1,624,681)  (1,181,885)

Deferred revenue

  11,303,389   1,277,828 

Net cash provided by operating activities

  3,322,447   9,379 

Cash flows from investing activities:

        

Capital expenditures

  (15,501)  (8,951)

Net cash used in investing activities

  (15,501)  (8,951)

Cash flows from financing activities:

        

Payment of employee tax obligations for common stock tendered

  (9,746)  (56,590)
Repurchase of common stock  (993,375)  - 
Repayment of Term Loan  (85,913,459)  - 

Net cash used in financing activities

  (86,916,580)  (56,590)

Net (decrease)/increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

  (83,609,634)  (56,162)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at the beginning of period

  160,986,934   180,396,910 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period

 $77,377,300  $180,340,748 
         

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash activities:

        

Conversion of warrants to common stock

 $-  $1,172,801 

Issuance of common stock upon cashless exercise

 $-  $118,500 

 Nine months ended September 30,
 2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:   
Net loss$(25,932,761) $(29,258,060)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:   
Depreciation and other amortization105,212
 130,704
Loss on change in fair value of warrant liability627,624
 1,121,530
Lease termination1,225,421
 
Stock-based compensation773,671
 521,666
            Deferred income taxes, net20,383
 16,246
Write down of inventory, net536,000
 
Non-cash interest expense3,363,712
 
Interest expense on term loan - paid with restricted cash7,633,396
 
Changes in assets and liabilities:   
                     Accounts receivable2,542,204
 (35,070,347)
                     Inventory22,690,715
 (5,304,431)
                     Deferred costs(24,091,967) (21,452,562)
                     Prepaid expenses and other current assets(137,970) (1,835,322)
                     Other assets
 1,347,437
                     Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities(1,719,229) 385,680
                     PharmAthene liability
 93,654,855
                     Liabilities subject to compromise
 (206,972,170)
                     Deferred revenue9,963,188
 111,865,203
                     Other liabilities(199,501) (63,171)
 Net cash used in operating activities(2,599,902) (90,912,742)
Cash flows from investing activities:   
              Capital expenditures(54,242) (10,997)
                    Net cash used in investing activities(54,242) (10,997)
Cash flows from financing activities:   
                    Net proceeds from exercise of warrants and options27,497
 
                    Buy back of stock options(84,000) 
              Payments associated with loan agreement and rights offering

 (1,294,501)
                    Payment of employee tax obligations for common stock tendered(193,052) 
               Net cash used in financing activities(249,555) (1,294,501)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(2,903,699) (92,218,240)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period28,701,824
 112,711,028
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$25,798,125
 $20,492,788
    
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:   
Cash interest paid on term loan from restricted cash$7,633,396
 $
Fair value of warrant, at issuance date, in connection with loan agreement and recorded as warrant liability


 (5,832,624)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

4

SIGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)


1..Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, included in the 20162019 Annual Report on Form 10-K. All terms used but not defined elsewhere herein have the meaning ascribed to them in the Company’s 20162019 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2017.5, 2020. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal and recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair statement of the results of the interim periods presented have been included. The 20162019 year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data waswere derived from the audited financial statements but doesdo not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year.


Closing

2. Summary of Chapter 11 Case


On April 12, 2016,Significant Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

All of the Company’s revenue is derived from long-term contracts that span multiple years. The Company accounts for revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”). A contract’s transaction price is allocated to distinct performance obligations and recognized as revenue when, or as, a performance obligation is satisfied. As of March 31, 2020, the Company's active performance obligations, for the contracts outlined in Note 3, consist of the following: five performance obligations relate to research and development services; one relates to manufacture and delivery of product; and one is associated with storage of product. The aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations was $47.0 million as of March 31, 2020. Remaining performance obligations represent the transaction price for which work has not been performed and excludes unexercised contract options.

Contract Balances

The timing of revenue recognition, billings and cash collections may result in billed accounts receivable, unbilled receivables (contract assets) and customer advances and deposits (contract liabilities) in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Generally, amounts are billed as work progresses in accordance with agreed-upon contractual terms either at periodic intervals (monthly) or upon achievement of contractual milestones. Under typical payment terms of fixed price arrangements, the customer pays the Company emergedeither performance-based payments or progress payments. For the Company’s cost-type arrangements, the customer generally pays the Company for its actual costs incurred, as well as its allocated overhead and G&A costs. Such payments occur within a short period of time from chapter 11billing. When the Company receives consideration, or such consideration is unconditionally due, prior to transferring goods or services to the customer under the terms of a sales contract, the Company records deferred revenue, which represents a contract liability. During the three months ended March 31, 2020, the Company recognized revenue of $0.1 million that was included in deferred revenue at the beginning of the Bankruptcy Code whenperiod.

Restricted Cash and Cash Equivalents

On March 13, 2020, the Company's planCompany repaid its Term Loan and restrictions on certain cash accounts were removed.  Prior to the repayment of reorganization (the “Plan”) became effective, andthe Term Loan, there were restrictions on December 22, 2016 the Company's chapter 11 case was closed by the Bankruptcy Court.certain cash accounts. Under the Plan, the Company fully paid all of its claims. The Company did not apply the provision of fresh start accounting as ownership of existing sharesterms of the Company's common stock remained unaltered by the Plan.


Prior to April, 12 2016, the effective date of the Plan, the Company was operating its business as a “debtor-in-possession.” The Company had filed on September 16, 2014 a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”) chapter 11 Case Number 14-12623 (SHL). The chapter 11 case preserved the Company's ability to satisfy its commitments under the BARDA ContractLoan Agreement (as defined in Note 3) and preserved its operations, which likely would have been jeopardized by the enforcement of a judgment stemmingbelow), net cash proceeds from the Company's litigation with PharmAthene, Inc. (“PharmAthene”Priority Review Voucher ("PRV") (see “PharmAthene Litigation” below)sale on October 31, 2018 were restricted and were held in a reserve account (as required under the Loan Agreement related to the Term Loan). While operatingCash and cash equivalents held in the reserve account were available to pay interest, fees and principal related to the Term Loan. See Note 8 for additional information. Prior to the second quarter of 2019, there was also a reserve account for certain proceeds of the Term Loan. This account was also restricted. Amounts in this reserve account were primarily used to pay interest on the Loan Agreement. This reserve account was closed in the second quarter 2019. 

The following tables reconcile cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash per the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows to the condensed consolidated balance sheet for each respective period:

  

As of

 
  

March 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $77,377,300  $65,249,072 

Restricted cash-short term

     95,737,862 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash $77,377,300  $160,986,934 

  

March 31, 2019

  

December 31, 2018

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $102,085,215  $100,652,809 

Restricted cash-short term

  11,461,290   11,452,078 

Restricted cash-long term

  66,794,243   68,292,023 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

 $180,340,748  $180,396,910 

5

Repurchase of shares

When shares recognized as equity are repurchased, the amount of the consideration paid, which includes directly attributable costs, is recognized as a debtor-in-possession under chapter 11,deduction from equity. The excess of the purchase price above par value of repurchased shares that are retired is presented as an increase to accumulated deficit (or a reduction of retained earnings, if any).

3. Procurement Contracts and Research Agreements

19C BARDA Contract 

On September 10, 2018, the Company pursued an appealentered into a contract with the U.S. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority ("BARDA") pursuant to which SIGA agreed to deliver up to 1,488,000 courses of oral TPOXX® to the U.S. Strategic National Stockpile ("Strategic Stockpile"), and to manufacture and deliver to the Strategic Stockpile, or store as vendor-managed inventory, up to 212,000 courses of the Delaware Courtintravenous (IV) formulation of Chancery Final OrderTPOXX® ("IV TPOXX®"). Additionally, the contract includes funding from BARDA for advanced development of IV TPOXX®, post-marketing activities for oral and Judgment, without havingIV TPOXX®, and procurement activities. As of April 29, 2020, the contract with BARDA (as amended, modified, or supplemented from time to post a bond.


PharmAthene Litigation

time, the "19C BARDA Contract") contemplates up to approximately $602.5 million of payments, of which approximately $51.7 million of payments are included within the base period of performance of five years, approximately $127.1 million of payments are related to exercised options and up to approximately $423.7 million of payments are currently specified as unexercised options. BARDA may choose in its sole discretion when, or whether, to exercise any of the unexercised options. The period of performance for options is up to ten years from the date of entry into the 19C BARDA Contract and such options could be exercised at any time during the contract term, including during the base period of performance. On November 16, 2016,May 20, 2019, an option for the Company satisfiedmanufacture and delivery of 363,070 courses of oral TPOXX® was modified to divide it into four procurement-related options. One of the Outstanding Judgment (as definedfour modified procurement-related options provides for the payment of $11.2 million for the procurement of raw materials to be used in the manufacture of at least Note 11363,070) owed courses of oral TPOXX®. This option was exercised simultaneously with the aforementioned modification. Each of the other three options individually specifies the delivery of approximately 121,000 courses of oral TPOXX® for consideration of approximately $33.8 million. These options were exercised on April 29, 2020. In total, the four options under the May 2019 modification provide for the purchase of raw material for and the manufacture and delivery of 363,070 courses of oral TPOXX® for consideration of approximately $112.5 million. The option modification did not change the overall total potential value of the 19C BARDA Contract, nor did it change the total amount to PharmAthenebe paid in connection with the Company's litigationmanufacture and delivery of oral TPOXX® courses.

The base period of performance specifies potential payments of approximately $51.7 million for the following activities: payments of approximately $11.1 million for the delivery of approximately 35,700 courses of oral TPOXX® to the Strategic Stockpile; payments of $8.0 million for the manufacture of 20,000 courses of final drug product of IV TPOXX® ("IV FDP"), of which $3.2 million of payments are related to the manufacture of bulk drug substance ("IV BDS") to be used in the manufacture of IV FDP; payments of approximately $32.0 million to fund advanced development of IV TPOXX®; and payments of approximately $0.6 million for supportive procurement activities. As of March 31, 2020, the Company had received $11.1 million for the successful delivery of approximately 35,700 courses of oral TPOXX® to the Strategic Stockpile, $3.2 million for the manufacture of IV BDS and $4.7 million for other base period activities. IV BDS is expected to be used for the manufacture of 20,000 courses of IV FDP. The $3.2 million received for the manufacture of IV BDS has been recorded as deferred revenue as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019; such amount is expected to be recognized as revenue when IV TPOXX® containing such IV BDS is delivered to the Strategic Stockpile or placed in vendor-managed inventory.

The options that have been exercised to date provide for additional potential payments up to approximately $127.1 million. There are exercised options for the following activities: payments up to $11.2 million for the procurement of raw materials to be used in the manufacture of at least 363,070 courses of oral TPOXX®, payments up to $101.3 million for the delivery of up to 363,070 courses of oral TPOXX®; and, payments of up to $14.6 million for funding of post-marketing activities for oral TPOXX®, of which, $2.3 million had been received as of March 31, 2020. The $11.2 million received for the procurement of raw materials has been recorded as deferred revenue as of March 31, 2020; such amount is expected to be recognized as revenue when oral TPOXX® formulated with PharmAthene. Insuch materials is delivered to the Strategic Stockpile or placed in vendor-managed inventory.

Unexercised options specify potential payments up to approximately $423.7 million in total PharmAthene was(if all such options are exercised). There are options for the following activities: payments of up to $337.7 million for the delivery of up to approximately 1,089,000 courses of oral TPOXX® to the Strategic Stockpile; payments of up to $76.8 million for the manufacture of up to 192,000 courses of IV FDP, of which up to $30.7 million of payments would be paid $217.0upon the manufacture of IV BDS to be used in the manufacture of IV FDP; payments of up to approximately $3.6 million to fund post-marketing activities for IV TPOXX®; and payments of up to approximately $5.6 million for supportive procurement activities.

The options related to IV TPOXX® are divided into two primary manufacturing steps. There are options related to the manufacture of bulk drug substance (“IV BDS Options”), and there are corresponding options (for the same number of IV courses) for the manufacture of final drug product (“IV FDP Options”). BARDA may choose to exercise any, all, or none of these options in its sole discretion. The 19C BARDA Contract includes: three separate IV BDS Options, each providing for the bulk drug substance equivalent of 64,000 courses of IV TPOXX®; and three separate IV FDP Options, each providing for 64,000 courses of final drug product of IV TPOXX®. BARDA has the sole discretion as to whether to simultaneously exercise IV BDS Options and IV FDP Options, or whether to make independent exercise decisions. If BARDA decides to only exercise IV BDS Options, then the Company would receive payments up to $30.7 million; alternatively, if BARDA decides to exercise both IV BDS Options and IV FDP Options, then the Company would receive payments up to $76.8 million. For each set of options relating to a specific group of courses (for instance, the IV BDS and IV FDP options that reference the same 64,000 courses), BARDA has the option to independently purchase IV BDS or IV FDP.

Revenues in connection with the Outstanding Judgment. See Note 1119C BARDA Contract are recognized either over time for additional detailsor at a point in time. Performance obligations related to this litigation.product delivery generate revenue at a point in time. Other performance obligations under the 19C BARDA Contract generate revenue over time. For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized revenues of $2.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, on an over time basis. In contrast, revenue recognized for product delivery, and therefore at a point in time, for the three months ended March 31, 2019was $7.1 million. There was no revenue recognized at a point in time during the three months ended March 31, 2020.

6


Liquidity

2011 BARDA Contract

On May 13, 2011, the Company signed a contract with BARDA pursuant to which BARDA agreed to buy from the Company 1.7 million courses of oral TPOXX®. Additionally, the Company agreed to contribute to BARDA 300,000 courses at no additional cost to BARDA.

The accompanying consolidated financial statementscontract with BARDA (as amended, modified, or supplemented from time to time the "2011 BARDA Contract") includes a base contract, as modified, ("2011 Base Contract") as well as options. The 2011 Base Contract specifies approximately $508.4 million of payments (including exercised options), of which, as of March 31, 2020, $459.8 million has been received by the Company for the manufacture and delivery of 1.7 million courses of oral TPOXX® and $45.1 million has been received for certain reimbursements in connection with development and supportive activities. Approximately $3.5 million remains eligible to be received in the future for reimbursements of development and supportive activities.

For courses of oral TPOXX® that have been prepared assumingphysically delivered to the Strategic Stockpile under the 2011 BARDA Contract, there are product replacement obligations, including: (i) a product replacement obligation in the event that the Company will continue asfinal version of oral TPOXX® approved by the FDA was different from any courses of oral TPOXX® that had been delivered to the Strategic Stockpile (the “FDA Approval Replacement Obligation”); (ii) a going concern and contemplate the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilitiesproduct replacement obligation, at no cost to BARDA, in the normal courseevent that oral TPOXX® is recalled or deemed to be recalled for any reason; and (iii) a product replacement obligation in the event that oral TPOXX® does not meet any specified label claims. On July 13, 2018, the FDA approved oral TPOXX® for the treatment of business. The Company is not entitled to receive any additional procurement-related payments under the current BARDA Contract (Note 3) if and until U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of TPOXX® has been achieved,smallpox and there is no difference between the approved product and courses of TPOXX® which have been delivered to the U.S. Strategic National Stockpile (Strategic Stockpile). Upon meeting these requirements, the Company is entitled to a $41 million hold back payment under the BARDA Contract. Based on a targeted New Drug Application (NDA) filing for TPOXX® by the end of 2017, it is currently anticipated that the Company will be eligible to receive the $41 million hold back payment in the second half of 2018.


In the event that the Company does not receive a substantial portion of the hold back payment, or other substantial cash inflows, by October of 2018, then, based on currently forecasted operating costs, the Company will require additional sources of funding to continue operations and prevent an event of default under its term loan (Note 8). In this case, the Company would seek to increase cash liquidity by: raising proceeds through a financing, entering into a new contract for TPOXX® or any other product, a sale of assets, or the modification of the existing BARDA Contract; significantly reducing its operating expenses; or modifying the terms of the Loan Agreement. There can be no assurance that TPOXX® will receive FDA approval on a timely basis, if at all, or that there will be no difference between the approved product and courses of TPOXX® which have been delivered to the Strategic Stockpile. Furthermore, there can be no assurance thatAs such, the Company would be able to increase cash liquidity, if needed, through a financing, a new contract for TPOXX® or any other product, a sale of assets, the modificationpossibility of the existingFDA Approval Replacement Obligation resulting in any future replacements of product within the Strategic Stockpile is remote.

The 2011 BARDA Contract or a significant reduction ofincludes options. On July 30, 2018, the 2011 BARDA Contract was modified and BARDA exercised its operating expenses or operations, or that the lenders would agreeoption relating to modify the term loan


agreement, if needed. Because of these uncertainties, substantial doubt exists about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for one year from the financial statement issuance date.

2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in Part I of this ASU change the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. The amendments in Part II of this ASU recharacterize the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented as pending content in the Codification, to a scope exception. Those amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business entities, the amendments in Part I of this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2017-11 will have on its consolidated financial statements.

On May 10, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Scope of Modification Accounting.The guidance clarifies when to account for a change to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award as a modification. Under the new guidance, modification accounting is required only if the fair value, the vesting conditions, or the classification of the award (as equity or liability) changes as a result of the change in terms or conditions. The standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 13, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company believes the adoption of ASU 2017-09 will not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On January 26, 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. A goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. All other goodwill impairment guidance will remain largely unchanged. Entities will continue to have the option to perform a qualitative assessment to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary. The same one-step impairment test will be applied to goodwill at all reporting units, even those with zero or negative carrying amounts. The revised guidance will be applied prospectively, and is effective for calendar year ends in 2020. Early adoption is permitted for any impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Company believes the adoption of ASU 2017-04 will not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On November 17, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, a consensus of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force. The new standard requires that the statement of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Entities will also be required to reconcile such total to amounts on the balance sheet and disclose the nature of the restrictions. The standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. The Company believes the adoption of ASU 2016-18 will have a significant impact due to the fact the Company will reflect sources and uses of restricted cash and cash equivalents in the consolidated statement of cash flows and provide a reconciliation of restricted cash balances.

On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), a consensus of the FASB’s Emerging Issues Task Force. The new guidance is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. The standard is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, provided that all of the amendments are adopted in the same period. The guidance requires application using a retrospective transition method. The Company believes the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB amended the existing accounting standards for stock-based compensation, ASU 2016-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The amendments impact several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, expected forfeitures, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The Company adopted the amendments in the first quarter of 2017. Prior to adoption of ASU 2016-09, tax attributes related to stock option windfall deductions were not recorded until they resulted in a reduction of cash tax payable. As of December 31, 2016, the excluded windfall deductions for federal and state purposes were $1.6 million. Upon adoption of ASU 2016-09, the Company recognized the excluded windfall deductions as a deferred tax asset with a corresponding offset to the related valuation allowance.

In respect of the forfeiture policy election, we will continue to estimate the number of awards expected to be forfeited.

On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842), which relates to the accounting for leasing transactions. This standard requires a lessee to record on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leases with lease terms of more than 12 months. In addition, this standard requires both lessees and lessors to disclose certain key information about lease transactions. This standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that ASU 2016-02 will have on its consolidated financial statements. Based upon its current evaluation, the Company believes that the majority of its leases which primarily consist of facility leases will be capitalized on its balance sheet.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU No. 2014-09 supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific revenue recognition guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Accounting Standards Codification. Additionally, this update supersedes some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, Revenue Recognition-Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. It is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted for the first interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company expects to adopt this standard when it becomes effective in the first quarter of 2018 using the modified retrospective method. Any adjustment upon adoption will be recorded as an accumulated adjustment due to a change in accounting in the stockholders’ deficiency section. The Company has determined that revenue connected with courses delivered to BARDA and related services, milestones and advance payments (activities in combination that constitute one performance obligation), will be recognized at a point in time when the product is delivered. The Company has determined that revenue associated with this performance obligation is subject to a constraint. The Company does not expect revenue to be recognized in connection with these activities upon the adoption of this standard because the constraint of FDA approval of TPOXX is not expected to be satisfied prior to the adoption date of this standard in early 2018. As such,aforementioned 84-month expiry for oral TPOXX® for which the Company does not expect adoption of this standard to have an impact onwas paid $50.0 million in August 2018. With the timing of revenue recognition foroption exercise, the above-mentioned activities. Separately,2011 BARDA Contract was modified so that the Company has determined that revenue for performance obligations associated with R&D activities will be recognized over time. With respect to these R&D activities, the Company expects to finalize the quantitative impact assessment upon the filing of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2017.

3. Procurement Contract and Research Agreements
Procurement Contract
On May 13, 2011 the Company signed a contract with the U.S. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”) pursuant to which SIGA agreed to deliver two million courses of TPOXX® to the Strategic Stockpile. The contract with BARDA (as modified, the “BARDA Contract”) is worth approximately $472.3 million, including $409.8 million related to the manufacture and delivery of 1.7 million courses of TPOXX® and $62.5 million of potential reimbursements connected to development and supportive activities (the “Base Contract”).

Under the Base Contract BARDA has agreed to buy from the Company 1.7 million courses of TPOXX®. Additionally, the Company is required to contribute to BARDA 300,000 courses at no additional cost to BARDA. A total of 2.0 million courses of TPOXX® is required to be delivered to the Strategic Stockpile in order for the Company to be eligible to receive the $40.9 million hold back payment (see description of hold back payment below).

For courses of TPOXX® that are physically delivered to the Strategic Stockpile, the Company has replacement obligations, at no cost to BARDA, in the event that the final version of TPOXX® approvedincreased by the FDA is different from any courses of TPOXX® that have been delivered to the Strategic Stockpile or$50.0 million. Remaining options, if TPOXX® does not meet any specified label claims, fails release testing or does not meet the 38-month expiry period (from time of delivery to the Strategic Stockpile), or if TPOXX® is recalled or deemed to be recalled for any reason.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company has received $368.9 million under the Base Contract related to the manufacture and physical delivery of courses of TPOXX®. Included in this amount are a $41.0 million advance payment in 2011 for the completion of certain planning and preparatory activities related to the Base Contract, a $12.3 million milestone payment in 2012 for the completion of the product labeling strategy for TPOXX®, an $8.2 million milestone payment in 2013 for the completion of the commercial validation campaign for TPOXX®, the $20.5 million milestone payment in 2016 for submission of documentation to BARDA indicating that data covering the first 100 subjects enrolled in the phase III pivotal safety study had been submitted to and reviewed by a Data and Safety Monitoring Board (“DSMB”) and that such DSMB had recommended continuation of the safety study, as well as submission of the final pivotal rabbit efficacy study report to the FDA, and $286.9 million of payments

for physical deliveries of TPOXX® to the Strategic Stockpile beginning in 2013.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company is eligible under the Base Contract to receive a $40.9 million hold back payment, which represents an approximate 10% hold back on the $409.8 million of total payments related to the manufacture and delivery of 1.7 million courses of TPOXX® under the Base Contract. The $40.9 million hold back payment would be triggered by FDA approval of TPOXX®, as long as the Company has cumulatively delivered 2.0 million courses of TPOXX® to the Strategic Stockpile and the Company does not have a continuing product replacement obligation to BARDA.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company has delivered 2.0 million courses of TPOXX® to the Strategic Stockpile. Courses delivered are at a dosage of 600 mg administered twice per day (1,200 mg per day). Courses delivered to the Strategic Stockpile are currently subject to a product replacement obligation.

Starting in 2015, product deliveries of TPOXX® have been at a provisional dosage of 600 mg administered twice per day (1,200 mg per day). This was a change from the provisional dosage that was in effect when product deliveriesall were made in 2013 and 2014 (600 mg per day). In 2013 and 2014, the provisional dosage of courses delivered to the Strategic Stockpile was 600 mg administered once a day. The change in the provisional dosage was based on FDA guidance received by the Company in 2014, subsequent to the delivery of 1.3 million courses of TPOXX®. Based on the current provisional dosage of 600 mg administered twice per day (1,200 mg per day), the Company supplemented previously delivered courses of TPOXX®, at no cost to BARDA, with additional dosages so that all of the courses previously delivered to BARDA are now at the current provisional dosage. In February 2016, the FDA confirmed (through dose concurrence) its earlier dosage guidance of 600 mg administered twice per day (1,200 mg per day).

In addition to the Base Contract, the BARDA Contract also separately contains $122.7 million of remaining options that, if exercised by BARDA:BARDA, would result in a $50.0 million paymentaggregate payments to the Company in the event of FDA approval for extension to 84-month expiry for TPOXX® (from 38-month expiry as required in the Base Contract); would fund$72.7 million, including up to $58.3 million of funding for development and supportive activities such as work on a smallpoxpost-exposure prophylaxis ("PEP") indication for TPOXX®; and/or would fund $14.4 million of funding for production-related activities related to warm-basewarm base manufacturing. BARDA may choose, in its sole discretion not to exercise any or all of the unexercised options. In 2015, BARDA exercised two options related to extending the indication of the drug to the geriatric and pediatric populations. The stated value of thesethose exercises was minimal. BARDA may choose not to exercise additional options in the future. Options are exercisable by BARDA at its sole discretion. BARDA has indicated that it will evaluate, after the FDA’s review and evaluation of stability data, the Company's request that BARDA exercise the option for the $50.0 million payment to the Company in the event of FDA approval of 84-month expiry for TPOXX®.

immaterial.

The 2011 BARDA Contract expires in September 2020.


The

Revenues in connection with the 2011 BARDA Contract isare recognized either over time or at a multiple deliverable arrangement comprising delivery of courses and covered research and development activities. The BARDA Contract provides certain product replacement rights with respect to delivered courses. For this reason, recognition of revenue that might otherwise occur upon delivery of courses is expected to be deferred until the Company’spoint in time. Performance obligations related to potential replacement of delivered courses are satisfied. The Company assessedproduct delivery generate revenue at a point in time. Remaining performance obligations under the selling price for each of2011 BARDA Contract generate revenue over time. For the aforementioned deliverables - researchthree months ended March 31, 2020 and development activities and drug product. The selling price of certain reimbursed research and development services was determined by reference to existing and past research and development grants and contracts between2019, the Company and various government agencies. The selling price of drug product was determined by reference to other companies’ sales of drug products such as antiviral therapeutics, orphan drugs and drugs with potential life-saving impact similar to TPOXX®, including products delivered to the Strategic Stockpile.


The Company has recognized revenue for reimbursement of certain BARDA Contract research and development services. Cash inflows related to delivery of courses are recorded as deferred revenue. In addition, direct costs incurred by the Company to fulfill the delivery of courses including the supplementing of courses previously delivered under the BARDA Contract are being deferred and will be recognized as expenses over the same period that the related deferred revenue is recognized as revenue.

As of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, deferred direct costs under the BARDA Contract of approximately $96.4$0.1 million and $72.2$0.1 million, respectively, are includedon an over time basis. There was no revenue recognized for product delivery and therefore at a point in deferred costs ontime for either the consolidated balance sheets. As of September 30, 2017, the Company recorded $377.4 million of deferred revenue. Deferred revenue has been recorded for the delivery of courses of TPOXX® to the Strategic Stockpile and certain supportive services provided as part of the BARDA Contract. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, revenue from reimbursed research and development under the BARDA Contract was $641,000 and $8.3 million, respectively.


March 31, 2020or 2019.

Research Agreements and Grants

The Company obtains funding fromhas an R&D program for IV TPOXX®. This program is funded by the contracts19C BARDA Contract and grants it obtains from various agencies of the U.S. Government to support its research anda development activities. Currently, the Company has one contract with an expiration dateBARDA (“IV Formulation R&D Contract”). The IV Formulation R&D Contract has a period of performance that terminates on December 30, 2020 and one grant with an expiration date2020. As of April 30, 2018, which in combination provideMarch 31, 2020, the IV Formulation R&D Contract provides for potential future aggregate research and development funding for specific projects of approximately $15.4$2.6 million. During

Revenues in connection with the IV Formulation R&D Contract are recognized over time. For the three months ended March 31, 2017,2020 and 2019, the Company recognized revenue of $0.4 million and $1.9 million, respectively, under this contract. 

In July 2019, the Company was awarded a multi-year research contract valued at a total of $19.5 million, with an initial award of $12.4 million, from the United States Department of Defense ("DoD") to support work in pursuit of a potential label expansion for oral TPOXX® that would include post-exposure prophylaxis ("PEP") of smallpox (such work known as the "PEP Label Expansion Program" and the contract was amendedreferred to increaseas the available funding for"PEP Label Expansion R&D Contract"). The term of the R&D program relatedinitial award is five years. In February 2020, the DoD increased the value of the award to the IV formulationtotal contract value of TPOXX® by$19.5 million. As of March 31, 2020 the PEP Label Expansion R&D Contract provides for future aggregate research and development funding under the initial award of approximately $10.1$19.2 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, the Company, under the PEP Label Expansion R&D Contract, recognized revenue of less than $0.1 million on an over time basis.

Contracts and to extend the end date of the period of performance from June 30, 2020 to December 30, 2020.


The funded amount includes,grants include, among other things, options that may or may not be exercised at the U.S. Government’s discretion. Moreover, the contractcontracts and grantgrants contain customary terms and conditions including the U.S. Government’s right to terminate or restructure a contract or grant for convenience at any time. As such, we may not be ableeligible to utilizereceive all available funds under the contract and/or grant.funds.



4.

4.Inventory


Due

Inventory includes costs related to the deferralmanufacture of revenue under the BARDA Contract (see Note 3 for additional information), amounts that would be otherwise recorded as cost of goods sold for delivered courses are recorded as deferred costs on the balance sheet. The value of inventory represents the costs incurred to manufacture TPOXX®.


Inventory consisted of the following:

  

As of

 
  

March 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 
Raw materials $2,602,672  $- 

Work in-process

  12,779,944   8,693,457 

Finished goods

  959,398   959,398 

Inventory

 $16,342,014  $9,652,855 

 As of
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Work in-process$2,025,445
 $18,916,084
Finished goods957,804
 7,293,880
Inventory$2,983,249
 $26,209,964

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, research and development expenses include net inventory-related losses of approximately $0 and $536,000, respectively. The $536,000 loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 relates to a $686,000 inventory write-down, partially offset by credits received from contract manufacturing organizations (CMO”) in connection with the inventory write-down.

5.

5.Property, Plant and Equipment


Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following: 

  

As of

 
  

March 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Leasehold improvements

 $2,420,028  $2,420,028 

Computer equipment

  617,298   601,797 

Furniture and fixtures

  377,859   377,859 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

  2,944,932   2,944,932 
   6,360,117   6,344,616 

Less - accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (3,859,476)  (3,726,313)

Property, plant and equipment, net

 $2,500,641  $2,618,303 
 As of
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Leasehold improvements$2,420,028
 $2,542,044
Computer equipment655,880
 770,479
Furniture and fixtures363,588
 455,220
 3,439,496
 3,767,743
Less - accumulated depreciation(3,319,761) (3,468,266)
Property, plant and equipment, net$119,735
 $299,477

Depreciation and amortization expense on property, plant, and equipment was $29,375$133,163 and $42,660$137,724 for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 and 2016, respectively, and was $105,212 and $130,704 for nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,2019, respectively. In connection with the lease termination discussed in Note 12, the Company wrote off $129,000 of leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017.


6.

6.Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities


Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consisted of the following:

  

As of

 
  

March 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Compensation

 $955,494  $2,966,139 

Deferred revenue

  13,601,728   2,298,341 

Interest payable

     977,724 

Lease liability, current portion

  427,064   419,709 

Research and development vendor costs

  231,832   707,685 

Professional fees

  401,073   288,707 

Vacation

  340,242   256,402 

Other

  701,265   722,204 

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities

 $16,658,698  $8,636,911 

 As of
 September 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Bonus$1,676,745
 $2,357,194
Professional fees661,194
 481,641
Vacation333,675
 262,664
Other (primarily R&D vendors and CMOs)1,649,380
 1,483,253
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities$4,320,994
 $4,584,752

7..Financial Instruments

2016 Warrant

On September 2, 2016, in connection with the entry into the Loan Agreement (see Note 8 for additional information), the Company issued a warrant (the Warrant“Warrant”) to the Lender to purchase a number of shares of the Company’s common stock equal to $4.0 million divided by the lower of (i) $2.29 per share and (ii) the subscription price paid in connection with the Rights Offering. The Warrant provides for weighted average anti-dilution protection and is exercisable in whole or in part for ten (10) years from the date of issuance. The per share subscription price paid was $1.50 in connection with the Rights Offering; accordingly, the exercise price of the Warrant has beenwas set at $1.50 per share.


share, and there were 2.7 million shares underlying the Warrant. Subsequent to partial exercises of the Warrant, there are approximately 1.5 million shares underlying the Warrant as of March 31, 2020.

The Company accounted for the Warrant in accordance with the authoritative guidance which requires that free-standing derivative financial instruments with certain anti-dilution and cash settlement features be classified as assets or liabilities at the time of the transaction, and recorded at their fair value. Any changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments are reported in earnings or loss as long as the derivative contracts are classified as assets or liabilities. Accordingly, theThe Company classified the Warrant as a liability and reportedreports the change in fair value in the statement of operations.


On September 2, 2016, the issuance date

As of the Warrant,March 31, 2020, the fair value of the liability classified Warrant was $5.8 million.$6.1 million. The Company applied a Monte Carlo Simulation-model to calculate the fair value of the liability classifiedliability-classified Warrant was calculated using the following assumptions: risk free interest rate of 1.60%0.50%; no dividend yield; an expected life of 10 years;6.42 years; and a volatility factor of 80%75%.

8. The Company compared the Monte Carlo simulation model calculation to a Black-Scholes model calculation. These models generated substantially equal fair values for the Warrant. As such,Debt

On March 13, 2020, the Company utilized a Black-Scholes model for September 30, 2017 to determine the fair value of the Warrant.



As of September 30, 2017, the fair value of the Warrant was $7.4 million. A Black Scholes model was applied to calculate the fair value of the liability classified Warrant using the following assumptions: risk free interest rate of 2.29%; no dividend yield; an expected life of 8.92 years; and a volatility factor of 80%.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded a loss of $295,771 and $627,624, respectively as a result of the change in fair value of the liability classified Warrant.

Rights Offering
On November 16, 2016, the Company completed a rights offering (the “Rights Offering”), pursuant to which it raised approximately $35.3 million in gross proceeds through the sale of 23,523,195 shares of its common stock. The Rights Offering was made pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 and declared effective by the SEC on October 21, 2016. As part of the Rights Offering, each stockholder of the Company received a subscription right for each share of common stock owned as of the record date of October 12, 2016. Each subscription right entitled its holder to invest $0.65 towards the purchase of shares of the Company's common stock at a subscription price equal to the lower of $1.50 or 85% of the volume weighted average price of Company shares during market hours on the expiration date of the Rights Offering. The Rights Offering expired on November 8, 2016. Through basic subscriptions and oversubscriptions, the Rights Offering was fully subscribed. The subscription price was set at $1.50. The Company used the net proceeds of the Rights Offering, together with proceeds fromvoluntarily prepaid the Loan Agreement in an approximate aggregate amount of $87.2 million.  The prepayment was made from restricted cash, including $80.0 million in respect of outstanding principal of the Term Loan, $4.0 million that was payable upon the repayment of the Loan Agreement, approximately $1.2 million of accrued interest, and cash on hand, to fully satisfy PharmAthene's claim under the plana prepayment premium amount of reorganization.

Rights Offering - Backstop Agreement
On October 13, 2016, in connection with the Rights Offering as discussed above,approximately $1.9 million.  The prepayment was made upon the Company enteredand the Lender agreeing to and entering into an investment agreement or “backstop agreement”,customary mutual releases reflecting that, subject to such prepayment in accordance with an affiliate of MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated (“M&F”), and certain other backstop parties (the “Backstop Parties”). Under the terms of the backstop agreement,Loan Agreement, all of the Backstop Parties agreed to purchase, pursuant toobligations under the Loan Agreement were released, discharged and satisfied in full.  Upon such prepayment and release, the Loan Agreement was terminated. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, the Company recognized approximately $5.0 million of a separate private placement, a numberloss on the extinguishment of shares of common stock equalthe Term Loan related to the numbers of shares that were not subscribed for inremaining unamortized discount and the Rights Offering. The backstop agreement provided that the subscription price for the Backstop Parties would be equal to the subscription price applicable to all shareholders under the Rights Offering. Because the Rights Offering was fully subscribed, the Backstop Parties were not required to draw on such commitment. The Company issued 708,530 shares to Backstop Parties, of which approximately 565,000 shares were received by M&F, in payment of the five percent backstop fee ($1,764,240) payable to the Backstop Parties in connection with the backstop agreement. When shares were issued to the Backstop Parties in payment of the backstop fee, the stock price of SIGA common stock was $2.49 per share (the closing price of the Company’s common stock on November 16, 2016). The fair value of the shares issued in satisfaction of the backstop fee was expensed to the income statement in the fourth quarter of 2016. There are no remaining payment obligations to the Backstop Parties under the Backstop Agreement.

8. Debt

prepayment premium.

On September 2, 2016, the Company entered into a loan and security agreement (as amended from time to time, the “Loan Agreement”) with OCM Strategic Credit SIGTEC Holdings, LLC (“Lender”), pursuant to which the Company received $80.0 million (the "Term Loan") (less fees and other items) on November 16, 2016 having satisfied certain pre-conditions. Such $80.0 million had been placed in an escrow account on September 30, 2016 (the “Escrow Funding Date”). Prior to the Escrow Release Date (November 16, 2016), the Company did not have access to, or any ownership interest in, the escrow account. Until the Escrow Release Date occurred, the Company did not have an obligation to make any payments under the Loan Agreement, no security was granted under the Loan Agreement and no affirmative or negative covenants or events of default were effective under the Loan Agreement. Amounts were held in the escrow account until the satisfaction of certain conditions including the closing of the Rights Offering on November 16, 2016. As part of the satisfaction of the PharmAthenea litigation claim, funds were released from the escrow account (the date on which such transfer occurred, the “Escrow Release Date”).


The Loan Agreement provides for a first-priority senior secured term loan facility in the aggregate principal amount of $80.0 million (the “Term Loan”), of which (i) $25.0 million was placed in a reserve account (the “Reserve Account”) only to be utilized to pay interest on the Term Loan as it becomes due; (ii) an additional $5.0 million was also placed in the Reserve Account and up to the full amount of such $5.0 million may be withdrawn after June 30, 2018 upon the satisfaction of certain conditions, provided that any of such amount is required to fund any interest to the extent any interest in excess of the aforementioned $25.0 million is due and owing and any of such $5.0 million remains in the Reserve Account; and (iii) $50.0 million (net of fees and expenses then due and owing to the Lender) was paid to PharmAthene as part of the final payment to satisfy the PharmAthene claim. Interest on the Term Loan iswas at a per annum rate equal to the Adjusted LIBOR rate plus 11.5%, subject to adjustments as set forth in the Loan Agreement. At September 30, 2017, the effective interest rate on the Term Loan, which includes interest payments and accretion of unamortized costs and fees, was 18.6%. The Company incurred approximately $3.7 million of interest expense during the three months ended September 30, 2017, of which $2.6 million was paid from restricted cash and the remaining $1.1 million accreted to the Term Loan balance. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company incurred approximately $11.0

million of interest expense, of which $7.6 million was paid from restricted cash and the remaining $3.4 million accreted to the Term Loan balance.

The Term Loan shall maturehad a maturity date on the earliest to occur of (i) the four yearfour-year anniversary of the Escrow Release Date, and (ii) the acceleration of certain obligations pursuant to the Loan Agreement. At maturity, $80.0 million of principal will be repaid, and an additional $4.0 million will be paid (see below). Prior to maturity, there are no scheduled principal payments.


Through the three and one-half year anniversary (May 17, 2020) of the Escrow Release Date, any prepayment of the Term Loan iswas subject to a make-whole provision in which interest payments related to the prepaid amount arewere due (subject to a discount of treasury rate plus 0.50%).


  Upon repayment of the Term Loan, an additional $4.0 million payment was required.  Such payment had been accreting to the Term Loan balance since the Escrow Release Date.

In connection with the Term Loan, the Company has granted the Lender a lien on and security interest in allissuance of the Company’s right, title and interest in substantially all of the Company’s tangible and intangible assets, including all intellectual property.


The Loan Agreement contains customary representations and warranties and customary affirmative and negative covenants. These covenants, among other things, require a minimum cash balance throughout the term of the Term Loan and the achievement of regulatory milestones by certain dates, and contain certain limitations on the ability of the Company to incur unreimbursed research and development expenditures over a certain threshold, make capital expenditures over a certain threshold, incur indebtedness, dispose of assets outside of the ordinary course of business and enter into certain merger or consolidation transactions. The aforementioned minimum cash requirement is $10.0 million for the remainder of 2017 and will reduce to $5.0 million for 2018 until the earlier of (i) December 31, 2018 and (ii) 45 days after FDA approval of TPOXX®; thereafter, the minimum cash requirement will be $20.0 million.

The Loan Agreement includes customary events of default, including, among others: (i) non-payment of amounts due thereunder, (ii) the material inaccuracy of representations or warranties made thereunder, (iii) non-compliance with covenants thereunder, (iv) non-payment of amounts due under, or the acceleration of, other material indebtedness of the Company and (v) bankruptcy or insolvency events. Upon the occurrence and during the continuance of an event of default under the Loan Agreement, the interest rate may increase by 2.00% per annum above the rate of interest otherwise in effect, and the Lenders would be entitled to accelerate the maturity of the Company’s outstanding obligations thereunder.

As of September 30, 2017, the Company is in compliance with the Loan Agreement covenants.

In connection with the Loan Agreement, the Company incurred $8.2 million of costs (including interest on amounts held in the escrow account between September 30, 2016 and November 15, 2016). Furthermore, an additional $4.0 million will becomewas payable when principalupon repayment of the Term Loan is repaid.principal. As part of the Company's entry into the Loan Agreement, the Company issued the Warrant (see Note 10) with a fair market value of $5.8 million. The fair value of the Warrant, as well as costs related to the Term Loan issuance, were recorded as deductions to the Term Loan balance on the Balance Sheet. These amounts arewere being amortized using the effective interest methodon a straight-line basis over the life of the related Term Loan. The $4.0 million that will be paid when principal is repaid is being accreted toCompany compared the Term Loan balance each quarter on a per diem basis. Asamortization under the effective interest method with the straight-line basis and determined the results were not materially different. 


9.

9.Fair Value of Financial Instruments


The carrying value of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and cash equivalents,accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses and other current liabilities approximates fair value due to the relatively short maturity of these instruments. Common stock warrants which are classified as liabilitiesa liability are recorded at their fair market value as of each reporting period.


The measurement of fair value requires the use of techniques based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. The inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:


Level 1 – Quoted prices for identical instruments in active markets.


Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations where inputs are observable or where significant value drivers are observable.


Level 3 – Instruments where significant value drivers are unobservable to third parties.



The Company uses model-derived valuations where certain inputs are unobservable to third parties to determine the fair value of certain common stock warrants on a recurring basis and classifyclassifies such liability classifiedliability-classified warrants in Level 3. As described in Note 7, the fair value of the liability classified warrant was $7.4$6.1 million at September 30, 2017.


At September 30, 2017, the fair value of the debt was $73.2 million and the carrying value of the debt was $69.9 million. The Company used a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of the debt by applying a discount rate to future payments expected to be made as set forth in the Loan Agreement.  The fair value of the loan was measured using level 3 inputs.  The discount rate was determined using market participant assumptions.  This valuation required significant judgment. 

March 31, 2020.

There were no transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020.

As of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, the Company had approximately $58.7 million and $56.7 million, respectively, of cash equivalents classified as Level 1 financial instruments. There were no Level 2 financial instruments as of March 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had approximately $5.6 million and $90.0 million of restricted cash equivalents classified as Level 1 and Level 2 financial instruments, respectively. 

The following table presents changes in the liability classifiedliability-classified warrant measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs:

  

Fair Value Measurements of Level 3 liability-classified warrant

 

Warrant liability at December 31, 2019

 $6,116,882 

Increase in fair value of warrant liability

  16,065 

Exercise of warrants

   

Warrant liability at March 31, 2020

 $6,132,947 


 Fair Value Measurements of Level 3 liability classified warrant
Warrant liability at December 31, 2016$6,727,409
Increase in fair value of warrant liability627,624
Warrant liability at September 30, 2017$7,355,033

10..Per Share Data

The Company computes, presents and discloses earnings per share in accordance with the authoritative guidance which specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings per share of entities with publicly held common stock or potential common stock. The objective of basic EPS is to measure the performance of an entity over the reporting period by dividing income (loss) by the weighted average shares outstanding. The objective of diluted EPS is consistent with that of basic EPS, except that it also gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period.

The following is a reconciliation of the basic and diluted loss per share computation: 

  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Net (loss)/income for basic earnings per share

 $(8,897,529) $1,629,777 

Less: Change in fair value of warrants

     (3,136,265)

Net (loss)/income, adjusted for change in fair value of warrants for diluted earnings per share

 $(8,897,529) $(1,506,488)

Weighted-average shares

  81,240,105   80,913,320 

Effect of potential common shares

     1,225,788 

Weighted-average shares: diluted

  81,240,105   82,139,108 

(Loss)/income per share: basic

 $(0.11) $0.02 

(Loss) per share: diluted

 $(0.11) $(0.02)

For the three months ended March 31, 2019, the diluted earnings per share calculation reflects the effect of the assumed exercise of outstanding warrants and any corresponding elimination of the impact included in operating results from the change in fair value of the warrants. Weighted-average diluted shares include the dilutive effect of warrants. The dilutive effect of warrants is calculated based on the average share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method.

The Company incurred losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 and 2016 and aslosses adjusted for the change in the fair value of warrants for the three months ended March 31, 2019. As a result, the equity instruments listed below arewere excluded from the calculation of diluted earningsincome (loss) per share as the effect of the exercise, conversion or vesting of such instruments would be anti-dilutive. The weighted average number of equity instruments excluded consistsconsisted of:

  

Three Months Ended March 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Stock options

  280,835   377,011 

Stock-settled stock appreciation rights

     6,756 

Restricted stock units

  236,848   509,411 

Warrants

  1,547,296    
 Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30, 
 2017 2016 2017 2016 
Stock Options1,200,123
 1,756,967
 1,485,466
 1,802,277
 
Stock-Settled Stock Appreciation Rights360,031
 360,031
 360,031
 360,125
 
Restricted Stock Units1,472,001
 586,675
(1)1,371,364
 603,427
 
Warrants2,690,950
 840,579
(2)2,690,950
 282,238
(2)

The appreciation of each stock-settled stock appreciation right was capped at a determined maximum value. As a result, the weighted average number shown in the table above for stock-settled stock appreciation rights reflectsreflected the weighted average maximum number of shares that could be issued.



(1) Included 313,337 restricted stock units that had vested but had not converted into common stock.
(2) For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, the weighted average number of shares that could be purchased with the Warrant issued on September 2, 2016.

11. . Commitments and Contingencies

After several years of proceedings in litigation initiated by PharmAthene in 2006, the Delaware Court of Chancery on August 8, 2014 issued an opinion and order in which it determined, among other things, that PharmAthene was entitled to a lump sum damages award for its lost profits including interest and fees, based on SIGA’s contract with BARDA for the purchase of 2.0 million courses of TPOXX® which was allegedly anticipated as of December 2006. On September 16, 2014, as a consequence of SIGA’s chapter 11 filing, the legal proceedings with PharmAthene were stayed (see Note 1), except that the parties agreed by stipulation approved by the Court on October 8, 2014 that the litigation could proceed. On January 15, 2015, the Delaware Court of Chancery entered its Final Order and Judgment (the Final Order and Judgment) awarding PharmAthene approximately $195.0 million, including pre-judgment interest up to January 15, 2015 (the “Outstanding Judgment”). On December 23, 2015 the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the Outstanding Judgment. Pursuant to the Final Order and Judgment, SIGA also was liable to PharmAthene for $30,663.89 per day in post-judgment interest. On a series of dates up to and including a final payment on November 16, 2016, the Company paid PharmAthene an aggregate of $217.0 million to fully satisfy the Outstanding Judgment, including post-judgment interest, in accordance with the bankruptcy plan of reorganization.


From time to time, we may be involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations and proceedings arising from the ordinary course of our business, collections claims, breach of contract claims, labor and employment claims, tax and other matters. Although such claims, suits, investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the resolution of such current pending matters, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flow. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of legal costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.

Purchase Commitments

In the course of our business, the Company regularly enters into agreements with third party organizations to provide contract manufacturing services and research and development services. Under these agreements, the Company issues purchase orders which obligate the Company to pay a specified price when agreed-upon services are performed. Commitments under the purchase orders do not exceed our planned commercial and research and development needs. As of  March 31, 2020, the Company had approximately $22.5 million of purchase commitments.


12.

12.Related Party Transactions


Board of Directors and Outside Counsel

A member of the Company’s Board of Directors is a member ofpartner at the Company’s outside counsel. During the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 and 2016,2019, the Company incurred expenses of $82,000 and $528,000, respectively, related to services provided by the outside counsel. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred expenses of $298,000 and $1,066,000, respectively,$117,000 and $113,000, respectively, related to services provided by the outside counsel. On September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 the Company’s outstanding payables and accrued expenses included an approximate $78,000 liability to the outside counsel.

Board of Directors-Consulting Agreement

On October 13, 2018, the Company, entered into a consulting agreement with Dr. Eric A. Rose, a member, and former Executive Chairman, of the Company’s Board of Directors. Under the agreement, the consulting services will include assisting the Company on expanded indications for TPOXX® and other business development opportunities as requested by the Company. The term of the agreement is for two years, with compensation for such services at an annual rate of $200,000. During the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company incurred $50,000 related to services under this agreement. As of March 31, 2020, the Company’s outstanding payables and accrued expenses included a $76,000$50,000 liability to the outside counsel.


Rights Offering-Backstop Agreement
On October 13, 2016, in connectionassociated with the Rights Offering as discussed above, the Company entered into the Backstop Agreement with an affiliate of M&F and the other Backstop Parties. Under the terms of the Backstop Agreement, the Backstop Parties agreed to purchase, pursuant to a separate private placement, a number of shares of common stock equal to the numbers of shares that would have not been subscribed for in the Rights Offering. The Backstop Agreement provided that the subscription price for the Backstop Parties would be equal to the subscription price applicable to all shareholders under the Rights Offering. Because the Rights Offering was fully subscribed, the Backstop Parties were not required to draw on such commitment. The Company issued 708,530 shares to Backstop Parties, of which approximately 565,000 shares were received by M&F, in payment of the five percent backstop fee ($1,764,240) payable to the Backstop Parties in connection with the backstopthis agreement. When shares were issued to the Backstop Parties in payment of the backstop fee, the stock price of SIGA common stock was $2.49 per share (the closing price of the Company’s common stock on November 16, 2016). The fair value of the shares issued in satisfaction of the backstop fee was expensed to the income statement in 2016. There are no remaining payment obligations to the Backstop Parties under the Backstop Agreement.

Real Estate Leases

On May 26, 2017, the Company and MacAndrews & Forbes Incorporated (“M&F”) entered into a ten-year Office Lease agreement (the “New HQ Lease”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to lease 3,200 square feet at 2731 East 62nd Street, New York, New York. The Company is utilizing premises leased under the New HQ Lease as its new corporate headquarters. The Company's rental obligations consist of a fixed rent of $25,333 per month in the first sixty-three months of the term, subject to a rent abatement for the first six months of the term. From the first day of the sixty-fourth month of the term through the expiration or earlier termination of the lease, the Company's rental obligations consist of a fixed rent of $29,333 per month. In addition to the fixed rent, the Company will pay a facility fee in consideration of the landlord making available certain ancillary services, commencing on the first anniversary of entry into the lease. The facility fee will be $3,333 per month for the second year of the term and increasing by five percent each year thereafter, to $4,925 per month in the final year of the term.


On July 31, 2017, the Company and M&F entered into a Termination of Sublease Agreement (the “Old HQ Sublease Termination Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company and M&F agreed to terminate the sublease dated January 9, 2013 for 6,676 square feet of rental square footage located at 660 Madison Avenue, Suite 1700, New York, New York (such sublease being the Old“Old HQ SubleaseSublease” and the location being the Old HQ“Old HQ”).


Effectiveness of the Old HQ Sublease Termination Agreement was conditioned upon the commencement of a sublease for the Old HQ between M&F and a new subtenant (the “Replacement M&F Sublease”), which occurred on August 2, 2017. The Old HQ Sublease Termination Agreement obligates the Company to pay, on a monthly basis, an amount equal to the discrepancy (the “Rent Discrepancy”) between the sum of certain operating expenses and taxes (“Additional Rent”) and fixed rent and Additional Rent (as defined below) under the Old HQ Overlease (as defined below)overlease between M&F and the landlord at 660 Madison Avenue and the sum of Additional Rent and fixed rent and Additional Rent under the Replacement M&F Sublease. Under the Old HQ Sublease Termination Agreement, the Company and M&F release each other from any liability under the Old HQ Sublease.


Under the Old HQ Sublease, the Company was obligated to pay fixed rent of approximately $60,000 per month until August 2018 and approximately $63,400 per month thereafter until the Old HQ Sublease expiration date of August 31, 2020. Additionally, the Company was obligated to pay certain operating expenses and taxes (“("Additional Rent”Rent"), such Additional Rent being specified in the overlease between M&F and the landlord at 660 Madison Avenue (the “Old"Old HQ Overlease”Overlease").



Under the Replacement M&F Sublease, the subtenant’s rental obligations arewere excused for the first two (2) months of the lease term (“Rent Concession PeriodPeriod”). Thereafter, the subtenant iswas obligated to pay fixed rent of $36,996 per month for the first twelve (12) months, and is obligated to pay $37,831 per month for the next 12 months, and $38,665 per month until the scheduled expiration of the Replacement M&F Sublease on August 24, 2020. In addition to fixed rent, the subtenant is also obligated to pay, pursuant to the Replacement M&F Sublease, a portion of the Additional Rent specified in the Old HQ Overlease.


For the time period between August 2, 2017 and August 31, 2020 (the expiration date of the Old HQ Sublease), the Company estimates that it will pay a total of approximately $0.9 million combined in fixed rent and additional amounts payable under the New HQ Lease and a total of approximately $1.1 million in Rent Discrepancy under the Old HQ Sublease Termination Agreement, for a cumulative total of $2.0 million. In contrast, fixed rent and estimated Additional Rent under the Old HQ Sublease, for the aforementioned time period, would have been a total of approximately $2.4 million if each of the New HQ Lease, Replacement M&F Sublease and Old HQ Sublease Termination Agreement had not been entered into by each of the parties thereto. Because amounts such as operating expenses and taxes may vary, the foregoing totals can only be estimated at this time and are subject to change.


As a result of the above-mentioned transactions, the Company has discontinued usage of Old HQ in the third quarter of 2017. As such, during the three monthsyear ended September 30,December 31, 2017 the Company recorded a loss of approximately $1.1 million in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (ASC(“ASC”) 420, Exit or Disposal Obligations. This loss primarily represented the discounted value of estimated Rent Discrepancy payments to occur in the future, and included costs related to the termination of the old HQ Sublease. The Company also wrote-off approximately $0.1 million of leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures related to the Old HQ.


13.Income Taxes 

The following table summarizes activity relatingCompany’s provision for income taxes consists of federal and state taxes, as applicable, in amounts necessary to align the Company’s year-to-date tax provision with the effective rate that it expects to achieve for the full year. Each quarter the Company updates its estimate of the annual effective tax rate and records cumulative adjustments as necessary.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was enacted in response to the liabilityCOVID-19 pandemic.  Under ASC 740, the effects of changes in tax rates and laws are recognized in the period which the new legislation is enacted.  The CARES Act made various tax law changes including among other things (i) increased the limitation under IRC Section 163(j) for 2019 and 2020 to permit additional expensing of interest (ii) enacted a technical correction so that wasqualified improvement property can be immediately expensed under IRC Section 168(k) and (iii) made modifications to the federal net operating loss rules including permitting federal net operating losses incurred in 2018, 2019, and 2020 to be carried back to the five preceding taxable years in order to generate a refund of previously paid income taxes (iv) enhanced recoverability of AMT tax credit carryforwards. As a result of the CARES Act, the Company recorded a discrete income tax benefit of approximately $19,000 related to a reduction in 2019 state and local taxes as a result of increased deductions and recorded a balance sheet reclassification to reflect an income tax receivable of $0.7 million related to the lease termination:accelerated recoverability of AMT credit carryforwards with a corresponding reduction to the Company’s deferred tax assets.

For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, we incurred pre-tax (loss)/income of ($11.6) million and $2.1 million, respectively, and a corresponding income tax benefit (provision) of $2.7 million and ($0.5) million, respectively. 

The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was 23.3% compared to 23.7% in the comparable prior period. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 differs from the U.S. statutory rate of 21% primarily as a result of non-deductible executive compensation under IRC Section 162(m) and a non-taxable adjustment for the fair market value of the Warrant.


14. Equity

The tables below present changes in stockholders' equity for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019.

  

Common Stock

  

Additional Paid-in

  

Accumulated

  

Other Comprehensive

  Total Stockholders' 
  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Capital

  

Deficit

  

Income

  

Equity

 

Balances at December 31, 2019

  81,269,868  $8,127  $220,808,037  $(123,032,408) $  $97,783,756 
Net loss            (8,897,529)     (8,897,529)

Repurchase of common stock

  (225,094)  (22)     (993,353)     (993,375)

Payment of common stock tendered for employee stock-based compensation tax obligations

  (1,892)     (9,746)        (9,746)

Issuance of common stock upon vesting of RSUs

  4,542                - 

Stock-based compensation

        259,016         259,016 

Balances at March 31, 2020

  81,047,424  $8,105  $221,057,307  $(132,923,290) $  $88,142,122 

  

Common Stock

  

Additional Paid-in

  

Accumulated

  

Other Comprehensive

  

Total Stockholders'

 
  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Capital

  

Deficit

  

Income

  

Equity

 

Balances at December 31, 2018

  80,763,350  $8,076  $218,697,872  $(115,791,261) $  $102,914,687 

Net income

           1,629,777      1,629,777 

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options

  9,769   1   (1)         

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock-settled appreciation rights

  16,771   2   (2)         

Issuance of common stock upon exercise of warrants

  159,782   16   1,172,785         1,172,801 

Payment of common stock tendered for employee stock-based compensation tax obligations

  (8,148)  (1)  (56,589)        (56,590)

Stock-based compensation

        408,894         408,894 

Balances at March 31, 2019

 $80,941,524  $8,094  $220,222,959  $(114,161,484) $  $106,069,569 
 Lease Termination liability
Balance at December 31, 2016$
Charges (recorded in the quarter ended September 30)1,096,648
Cash payments, net of sublease income(206,457)
Balance at September 30, 2017$890,191

As

On March 5, 2020, the Company announced that the board of September 30, 2017, approximately $0.6directors had authorized a share repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $50 million of the Company's common stock through December 31, 2021.  The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including: exercise of procurement options under government contracts; alternative opportunities for strategic uses of cash; the stock price of the Company’s common stock; market conditions; and other corporate liquidity requirements and priorities.  Repurchases under the program may be made from time to time at the Company’s discretion in open market transactions, through block trades, in privately negotiated transactions, and pursuant to any trading plan that may be adopted by the Company’s management in accordance with Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise. During the three-month period ended March 31, 2020, the Company repurchased 225,094 shares of common stock for approximately $1 million.

15. Leases

The Company leases its Corvallis, Oregon, facilities and office space under an operating lease terminationwhich was signed on November 3, 2017 and commenced on January 1, 2018. The initial term of this lease was to expire on December 31, 2019 after which the Company has two successive renewal options; one for two years and the other for three years. In the second quarter of 2019, the Company exercised the first renewal option, which extended the lease expiration date to December 31, 2021.

On May 26, 2017 the Company and M&F entered into a ten-year office lease agreement (the “New HQ Lease”), pursuant to which the Company agreed to lease 3,200 square feet in New York, New York. The Company is utilizing premises leased under the New HQ Lease as its corporate headquarters. The Company has no leases that qualify as finance leases.

Operating lease costs totaled $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities from operating cash flows was $0.1 million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of March 31, 2020, the weighted-average remaining lease term of the Company’s operating leases was 6.10 years while the weighted-average discount rate was 4.53%.

Future undiscounted cash flows under operating leases as of March 31, 2020 are expected to be as follows:

2020

 $396,034 

2021

  600,362 

2022

  368,467 

2023

  402,078 

2024

  404,258 

Thereafter

  982,880 

Total undiscounted cash flows under leases

  3,154,079 

Less: Imputed interest

  (449,481)

Present value of lease liabilities

 $2,704,598 

As of March 31, 2020, approximately $2.3 million of the lease liability is included in otherOther liabilities on the Condensed Consolidated Balance sheet.


13.Income Taxes

ASC 740, Income Taxes requires that a valuation allowance be established when it is more likely than notthat all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized. A review of all available positive and negative evidence needs to be considered, including the company's performance, the market environment in which the company operates, the utilization of past tax credits, length of carryback and carryforward periods, existing contracts, and unsettled circumstances that, if unfavorably resolved, would adversely affect future operations and profit levels in the future years. Based on the available evidence, the Company continues to conclude that its deferred tax assets are not realizable on a more-likely-than-not basis.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company recorded an income tax provision of $134,668 and $342,563, respectively, on a pre-tax loss of $9.7 million and $25.6 million, respectively. The effective tax rate differs from the statutory rate as no income tax benefit was recorded for current year operating losses due to the Company’s assessment regarding tax realizability of its deferred tax asset.

14. Reorganization Items, net:

Reorganization items represent expenses in connectioncondensed consolidated balance sheet with the chapter 11 case. For the nine months ended September, 30 2016, reorganization items consistedcurrent portion included in accrued expenses.


  Nine months ended September 30,
  2016
Legal fees $1,951,381
Professional fees 1,732,521
Trustee fees $33,000
Total $3,716,902

Subsequent to the Effective Date of the Plan, expenses directly attributable to the implementation of the Plan are reported in selling, general and administrative expenses. During the
nine months ended September, 30 2016, the Company paid approximately  $4.6 million for reorganization items.

Item 2.2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements and other financial information appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and other parts of this Quarterly Report contain forward-looking information that involves risks and uncertainties.

Overview

We are a commercial-stage pharmaceutical company specializing infocused on the developmenthealth security market. Health security comprises countermeasures for biological, chemical, radiological and commercialization of solutionsnuclear attacks (biodefense market), vaccines and therapies for serious unmet medical needsemerging infectious diseases, and biothreats.health preparedness. Our lead product is an oral formulation of TPOXX® (“oral TPOXX®”), an orally administered antiviral drug for the treatment of human smallpox disease caused by variola virus.

COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused significant societal and economic disruption.  Such disruption, and the associated risks and costs, are expected to continue for an indeterminate period of time.  Given the uncertain future course of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the uncertain scale and scope of its future impact, the Company is continually reviewing business and financial risks related to the pandemic and seeking coordination with its government partners with respect to the performance of current and future government contracts.  Additionally, the Company is coordinating with service providers and vendors, in particular CMOs that targets orthopoxvirus infections, including smallpox. While TPOXX® is not yet approved as safe or effectiveconstitute our supply chain, to review actions and risks caused by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration, it is a novel small-molecule drug that is being deliveredCOVID-19 pandemic.

As of the filing date of this document, the Company has not identified or been notified by government customers of impediments to the Strategic National Stockpilecontinued full performance of their government contracts. Additionally, the Company’s supply chain for the manufacture of TPOXX® has remained operational without material disruption to TPOXX®-related manufacture, and in the ordinary course of operations, the supply chain has secured sufficient raw materials to support the ultimate manufacture and product delivery of at least 363,000 courses of oral TPOXX® (number of courses specified in April 2020 option exercise under Project Bioshield.


Closingthe 19C BARDA Contract). With regard to day-to-day operations, the COVID-19 pandemic has slowed the daily pace of Chapter 11 Case

On April 12, 2016,execution of government contracts, as government staff overseeing SIGA contracts have been involved directly or indirectly in the federal government’s response to the pandemic, which has diverted government staff time normally directed toward contract matters involving SIGA. With respect to research and development activities, the Company emerged from chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code when the Company's plan of reorganization (the “Plan”) became effective, and on December 22, 2016 the Company's chapter 11 case was closed by the Bankruptcy Court. Under the Plan, the Company fully paid all of its claims. The Company did not apply the provisions of fresh start accounting as ownership of existing shares of the Company's common stock remained unaltered by the Plan.

Prior to April 12, 2016, the effective date of the Plan, the Company was operating its business as a “debtor-in-possession.” The Company had filed on September 16, 2014 a voluntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”) chapter 11 Case Number 14-12623 (SHL). The chapter 11 case preserved the Company's ability to satisfy its commitments under the BARDA Contract (as defined in Note 3 to the financial statements) and preserved its operations, which likely would have been jeopardized by the enforcement of a judgment stemming from the Company's litigation with PharmAthene, Inc. (“PharmAthene”) (see “PharmAthene Litigation” below). While operating as a debtor-in-possession under chapter 11, the Company pursued an appeal of the Delaware Court of Chancery Final Order and Judgment, without having to post a bond.
PharmAthene Litigation
On November 16, 2016, the Company satisfied the Outstanding Judgment (as defined in Note 11 to the financial statements) owed to PharmAthenedoes expect delays in connection with certain research and development activities, such as those that involve clinical trials.  The Company does not currently expect any pandemic-related delays in research and development to have a material adverse impact on the Company's litigation with PharmAthene. In total, PharmAthene was paid $217.0 millionfinancial condition or annual financial results of the Company, or its long-term performance, but cannot give assurances as to the extent of the impact at this time. 

Overall, the COVID-19 pandemic has not adversely affected the liquidity position of the Company, nor is it currently expected to have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or financial results of the Company.  The pandemic has resulted in connectionalmost all of our employees working from home; however, the shift in location for employees has not had a material adverse impact on the day-to-day operations of the Company. If the negative effect of the COVID-19 pandemic is prolonged, there could be risks to our business and cash flows.

BARDA Contracts-TPOXX®

19C BARDA Contract 

On September 10, 2018, the Company entered into a contract with the Outstanding Judgment. See Note 11U.S. Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority ("BARDA") pursuant to the financial statements for additional details relatedwhich SIGA agreed to this litigation.

Liquidity

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and contemplate the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company is not entitleddeliver up to receive any additional procurement-related payments under the current BARDA Contract (Note 31,488,000) if

and until U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of TPOXX® has been achieved, and there is no difference between the approved product and courses of oral TPOXX® which have been delivered to the U.S. Strategic National Stockpile (("Strategic StockpileStockpile"). Upon meeting these requirements, the Company is entitled, and to a $41 million hold back payment under the BARDA Contract. Based on a targeted New Drug Application (NDA) filing for TPOXX® by the end of 2017, it is currently anticipated that the Company will be eligible to receive the $41 million hold back payment in the second half of 2018.

In the event that the Company does not receive a substantial portion of the hold back payment, or other substantial cash inflows, by October of 2018, then, based on currently forecasted operating costs, the Company will require additional sources of funding to continue operationsmanufacture and prevent an event of default under the Term Loan (Note 8). In this case, the Company would seek to increase cash liquidity by: raising proceeds through a financing, entering into a new contract for TPOXX® or any other product, a sale of assets, or the modification of the existing BARDA Contract; significantly reducing its operating expenses; or modifying the terms of the Loan Agreement. There can be no assurance that TPOXX® will receive FDA approval on a timely basis, if at all, or that there will be no difference between the approved product and courses of TPOXX® which have been delivereddeliver to the Strategic Stockpile. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that the Company would be ableStockpile, or store as vendor-managed inventory, up to increase cash liquidity, if needed, through a financing, a new contract for TPOXX® or any other product, a sale of assets, the modification212,000 courses of the existingintravenous (IV) formulation of TPOXX® ("IV TPOXX®"). Additionally, the contract includes funding from BARDA for advanced development of IV TPOXX®, post-marketing activities for oral and IV TPOXX®, and procurement activities. As of April 29, 2020, the contract with BARDA (as amended, modified, or supplemented from time to time, the "19C BARDA Contract") contemplates up to approximately $602.5 million of payments, of which approximately $51.7 million of payments are included within the base period of performance of five years, approximately $127.1 million of payments are related to exercised options and up to approximately $423.7 million of payments are currently specified as unexercised options. BARDA may choose in its sole discretion when, or whether, to exercise any of the unexercised options. The period of performance for options is up to ten years from the date of entry into the 19C BARDA Contract or a significant reductionand such options could be exercised at any time during the contract term, including during the base period of its operating expenses or operations, or that the lenders would agree to modify the Term Loan Agreement, if needed. Because of these conditions, substantial doubt exists about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concernwithin one year after the financial statement issuance date.

Lead Product-TPOXX®

performance. On May 13, 2011, SIGA signed20, 2019, an option for the manufacture and delivery of 363,070 courses of oral TPOXX® was modified to divide it into four procurement-related options. One of the four modified procurement-related options provides for the payment of $11.2 million for the procurement of raw materials to be used in the manufacture of at least 363,070 courses of oral TPOXX®. This option was exercised simultaneously with the aforementioned modification. Each of the other three options individually specifies the delivery of approximately 121,000 courses of oral TPOXX® for consideration of approximately $33.8 million. These options were exercised on April 29, 2020. In total, the four options under the May 2019 modification provide for the purchase of raw material for and the manufacture and delivery of 363,070 courses of oral TPOXX® for consideration of approximately $112.5 million. The option modification did not change the overall total potential value of the 19C BARDA Contract, pursuantnor did it change the total amount to which we agreed to deliver twobe paid in connection with the manufacture and delivery of oral TPOXX® courses.
The base period of performance specifies potential payments of approximately $51.7 million for the following activities: payments of approximately $11.1 million for the delivery of approximately 35,700 courses of oral TPOXX® to the Strategic Stockpile. The BARDA Contract is worth approximately $472.3 million, including $409.8Stockpile; payments of $8.0 million for the manufacture of 20,000 courses of final drug product of IV TPOXX® ("IV FDP"), of which $3.2 million of payments are related to the manufacture of bulk drug substance ("IV BDS") to be used in the manufacture of IV FDP; payments of approximately $32.0 million to fund advanced development of IV TPOXX®; and payments of approximately $0.6 million for supportive procurement activities. As of March 31, 2020, the Company had received $11.1 million for the successful delivery of 1.7 millionapproximately 35,700 courses of oral TPOXX® and $62.5 million of potential reimbursements related to development and supportive activities (the “Base Contract”). Under the Base Contract, BARDA has agreed to buy from SIGA 1.7 million courses of TPOXX®. Additionally, SIGA is required to contribute to BARDA 300,000 courses at no additional cost to BARDA.

In addition to the Base Contract, the BARDA Contract also contains various remaining options that, if exercisable by BARDA: would result in a $50.0 million payment to the Company in the event of FDA approval for extension to 84-month expiry for TPOXX® (from 38-month expiry as required in the Base Contract); would fund up to $58.3 million of development and supportive activities such as work on a smallpox prophylaxis indication for TPOXX®; and/or would fund $14.4 million of production-related activities related to warm-base manufacturing. In 2015, BARDA exercised two options related to extending the indication of the drug to the geriatric and pediatric populations. The stated value of these exercises was minimal. BARDA may choose not to exercise additional options in the future. Options are exercisable by BARDA at its sole discretion. BARDA has indicated that it will evaluate, after the FDA's review and evaluation of stability data, the Company's request that BARDA exercise the option for the $50.0 million payment to the Company in the event of FDA approval of 84-month expiry for TPOXX®.

The BARDA Contract expires in September 2020.    

For courses of TPOXX® that are physically delivered to the Strategic Stockpile, $3.2 million for the Company has replacement obligations, at no costmanufacture of IV BDS and $4.7 million for other base period activities. IV BDS is expected to BARDA, inbe used for the event thatmanufacture of 20,000 courses of IV FDP. The $3.2 million received for the final versionmanufacture of TPOXX® approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) is different from any course of TPOXX® thatIV BDS has been recorded as deferred revenue as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019; such amount is expected to be recognized as revenue when IV TPOXX® containing such IV BDS is delivered to the Strategic Stockpile or if TPOXX® does not meet any specific label claims, fails release testing or does not meetplaced in vendor-managed inventory.

The options that have been exercised to date provide for additional potential payments up to approximately $127.1 million. There are exercised options for the 38-month expiry period (from timefollowing activities: payments up to $11.2 million for the procurement of delivery to the Strategic Stockpile), or if TPOXX® is recalled or deemedraw materials to be recalledused in the manufacture of at least 363,070 courses of oral TPOXX®, payments up to $101.3 million for any reason.

We believethe delivery of up to 363,070 courses of oral TPOXX®; and, payments of up to $14.6 million for funding of post-marketing activities for oral TPOXX®, of which, $2.3 million had been received as of March 31, 2020. The $11.2 million received for the procurement of raw materials has been recorded as deferred revenue as of March 31, 2020; such amount is among the first new small-molecule drugsexpected to be recognized as revenue when oral TPOXX® formulated with such materials is delivered to the Strategic Stockpile or placed in vendor-managed inventory.

Unexercised options specify potential payments up to approximately $423.7 million in total (if all such options are exercised). There are options for the following activities: payments of up to $337.7 million for the delivery of up to approximately 1,089,000 courses of oral TPOXX® to the Strategic Stockpile; payments of up to $76.8 million for the manufacture of up to 192,000 courses of IV FDP, of which up to $30.7 million of payments would be paid upon the manufacture of IV BDS to be used in the manufacture of IV FDP; payments of up to approximately $3.6 million to fund post-marketing activities for IV TPOXX®; and payments of up to approximately $5.6 million for supportive procurement activities.

The options related to IV TPOXX® are divided into two primary manufacturing steps. There are options related to the manufacture of bulk drug substance (“IV BDS Options”), and there are corresponding options (for the same number of IV courses) for the manufacture of final drug product (“IV FDP Options”). BARDA may choose to exercise any, all, or none of these options in its sole discretion. The 19C BARDA Contract includes: three separate IV BDS Options, each providing for the bulk drug substance equivalent of 64,000 courses of IV TPOXX®; and three separate IV FDP Options, each providing for 64,000 courses of final drug product of IV TPOXX®. BARDA has the sole discretion as to whether to simultaneously exercise IV BDS Options and IV FDP Options, or whether to make independent exercise decisions. If BARDA decides to only exercise IV BDS Options, then the Company would receive payments up to $30.7 million; alternatively, if BARDA decides to exercise both IV BDS Options and IV FDP Options, then the Company would receive payments up to $76.8 million. For each set of options relating to a specific group of courses (for instance, the IV BDS and IV FDP options that reference the same 64,000 courses), BARDA has the option to independently purchase IV BDS or IV FDP.
Revenues in connection with the 19C BARDA Contract are recognized either over time or at a point in time. Performance obligations related to product delivery generate revenue at a point in time. Other performance obligations under Project BioShield.the 19C BARDA Contract generate revenue over time. For the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, the Company recognized revenues of $2.1 million and $1.3 million, respectively, on an over time basis. In contrast, revenue recognized for product delivery, and therefore at a point in time, for the three months ended March 31, 2019was $7.1 million. There was no revenue recognized at a point in time during the three months ended March 31, 2020.

Research Agreements and Grants

The Company has an R&D program for IV TPOXX®. This program is funded by the 19C BARDA Contract and a separate development contract with BARDA ("IV Formulation R&D Contract"). The IV Formulation R&D Contract has a period of performance that terminates on December 30, 2020. As of March 31, 2020, the IV Formulation R&D Contract provides for future aggregate research and development funding of approximately $2.6 million. See Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements regarding the 19C BARDA Contract.

In July 2019, the Company was awarded a multi-year research contract valued at a total of $19.5 million, with an investigational productinitial award of $12.4 million, from the United States Department of Defense ("DoD") to support work in pursuit of a potential label expansion for oral TPOXX® that is not currently approved by FDA as a treatmentwould include post-exposure prophylaxis ("PEP") of smallpox (such work known as the "PEP Label Expansion Program" and the contract referred to as the "PEP Label Expansion R&D Contract"). The term of the initial award is five years. In February 2020, the DoD increased the value of the award to the total contract value of $19.5 million. As of March 31, 2020 the PEP Label Expansion R&D Contract provides for future aggregate research and development funding under the award, as modified, of approximately $19.2 million. 

Contracts and grants include, among other things, options that may or may not be exercised at the U.S. Government’s discretion. Moreover, contracts and grants contain customary terms and conditions including the U.S. Government’s right to terminate or restructure a contract or grant for convenience at any other indication. FDAtime. As such, we may not be eligible to receive all available funds.

International Promotion of Oral TPOXX®

On April 3, 2020, the Company announced that the Canadian Department of National Defence (the “CDND”) awarded a contract (the "Canadian Contract") to Meridian Medical Technologies, Inc., a Pfizer Company ("Meridian"), pursuant to which the CDND will purchase up to 15,325 courses of oral TPOXX® over four years for a total value of $14.3 million, with an initial purchase of 2,500 courses for $2.3 million and remaining purchases, at the option of the CDND, expected to occur after regulatory approval of oral TPOXX® in Canada. Meridian is the CDND's counterparty under the Canadian Contract, and SIGA is responsible for manufacture and delivery of any oral TPOXX® purchased thereunder.  The contract award was coordinated between SIGA and Meridian under the international promotion agreement (the "International Promotion Agreement") that was entered into by the parties on June 3, 2019.

Under the terms of the International Promotion Agreement, Meridian was granted exclusive rights to market, advertise, promote, offer for sale, or sell oral TPOXX® in a field of use specified in the International Promotion Agreement in all geographic regions except for the United States and South Korea (the “Territory”), and Meridian has designatedagreed not to commercialize any competing product, as defined in the International Promotion Agreement, in the specified field of use in the Territory. SIGA will retain ownership, intellectual property, distribution and supply rights and regulatory responsibilities in connection with TPOXX®, and, in the United States and South Korean markets, will also retain sales and marketing rights with respect to oral TPOXX®. SIGA’s consent shall be required for “fast-track” status, creatingthe entry into any sales arrangement pursuant to the International Promotion Agreement.

The fee Meridian retains pursuant to the International Promotion Agreement will be a pathspecified percentage of the collected proceeds of sales of oral TPOXX® net of certain expenses, for expedited FDA reviewyears in which customer invoiced amounts net of such expenses are less than or equal to a specified threshold, and eventual regulatory approval.a higher specified percentage of such collected net proceeds for years in which such net invoiced amounts exceed the specified threshold.

16

Critical Accounting Estimates

The methods, estimates and judgments we use in applying our accounting policies have a significant impact on the results we report in our condensed consolidated financial statements, which we discuss under the heading “Results of Operations” following this section of our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. Some of our accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates of matters that are inherently uncertain. Information regarding our critical accounting policies and estimates appears in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 as filed on March 5, 2020. Our most critical accounting estimates include revenue recognition, the valuation of stock-based awards including options and warrants granted or issued by the Company revenue recognition,and income taxes, and realization of deferred tax assets.


taxes.

Results of Operations


2019, revenues from product sales and supportive services were $0.1 million and $7.1 million, respectively. Such revenues in 2019 were associated with the delivery of approximately 23,000 courses of oral TPOXX® to the Strategic Stockpile under the 19C BARDA Contract. There were no product deliveries for the three months ended March 31, 2020.

Revenues from research and development contracts and grantsactivities for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 and 2016,2019, were $1.4$2.5 million and $4.7$3.3 million, respectively. The decrease in revenue of approximately $3.3$0.8 million, or 70%24%, primarily reflects a decrease in revenues from our federal contracts supporting the development of TPOXX. Revenues from federal contracts supportingIV TPOXX® because the scope of development activities related to IV TPOXX® has decreased. This decrease was partially offset by an increase of approximately $1.0 million associated with oral TPOXX®. Revenue in connection with the development of TPOXX have decreasedoral TPOXX® has increased because the numberscope of development activities related to oral TPOXX® has increased.

Cost of sales and scalesupportive services for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, were $0.1 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Such costs in 2019 were associated with the delivery of studies that were activeapproximately 23,000 courses of oral TPOXX® during the quarter have decreased in comparison to the prior year.


Revenues from research and development contracts and grants for ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019.

Selling, general and 2016, were $10.9 million and $7.8 million, respectively. The increase in revenue of approximately $3.1 million, or 39%, is attributable to an increase in revenues from our federal contracts supporting the development of TPOXX. Revenues from federal contracts supporting the development of TPOXX have increased for the nine-month period because the number and scale of studies that were active in the early part of 2017 had increased in comparison to the corresponding period in the prior year.


Selling, General and Administrativeadministrative (“SG&A”) expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 and 2016,2019, were $3.1in each case $3.2 million. With expenses approximately flat over comparable periods, increases in insurance expenses of $0.1 million and $2.9 million, respectively, reflecting an increase of approximately $239,000, or 8%. The increase is primarily attributable to a $445,000 increase in employee compensation expense, partiallywere offset by an $82,000a comparable decrease in corporate governance expenses, which were elevated in the third quarter of 2016 due to strategic initiatives in connection with the final resolution of the PharmAthene litigation,professional service fees.

Research and decreases in a broad array of corporate expenses. The increase in employee compensation expense is primarily due to an increase in senior management headcount.


SG&Adevelopment (“R&D”) expenses for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 and 2016,2019 were $9.0$3.2 million and $9.3$4.0 million, respectively, reflecting a decrease of approximately $254,000,$0.8 million, or 3%21%. The decrease is primarily attributable to a $2.0 million decrease in professional service fees, partially offset by a $1.9 million increase in employee compensation expense. The decrease in professional service fees is primarily due to the final resolution of the PharmAthene litigation, which has resulted in a decrease in legal fees. The increase in employee compensation expense is primarily due to an increase in senior management headcount.

Research and Development (“R&D”) expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were $2.5 million and $6.1 million, respectively, reflecting a decrease of approximately $3.6 million, or 59%. The decrease is attributable to a $3.3 million decrease in direct vendor-related expenses supporting the development of TPOXX.

R&D expenses for nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were $13.9 million and $11.6 million, respectively, reflectingIV TPOXX® partially offset by an increase of approximately $2.3 million or 20%. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase of $2.1 million in direct vendor-related expenses supporting the development of TPOXX, and a net expenseoral TPOXX®.

17


Lease termination expense

In connection with the voluntary repayment of the Term Loan on March 13, 2020, we recognized a loss on the extinguishment of the Term Loan of approximately $5.0 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was approximately $1.2 million. This expense relates to the Old HQ Sublease Termination Agreement. See Note 12 to the financial statements for additional information.


Interest expense on the PharmAthene liability for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $3.6 million and $7.4 million, respectively. These amounts represented interest expense related to post-judgment interest on the Delaware Court of Chancery Final Order and Judgment. On November 16, 2016, we fully paid the PharmAthene liability, and thus there was no interest expense on the PharmAthene liability for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. See Note 11 to the financial statements for additional information.

March 31, 2020.

Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 and 2019 was $3.7$3.0 million and $11.0$3.9 million, respectively. Interest expenseThe $3.0 million of interest for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $95,000March 31, 2020 includes $0.9 million of accretion of unamortized costs and $105,000, respectively. Interest expense in 2017 represents interest accrued onfees (prior to repayment of the Term Loan.Loan). The $11.0$3.9 million of interest expense for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 includes a $7.6 million cash payment from restricted cash, and $3.4$1.1 million of accretion of unamortized costs and fees related to the Term Loan balance.


Reorganization expenses

Changes in the fair value of the liability-classified warrant to acquire common stock were recorded within the income statement. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, we recorded a loss of approximately $16,000. For the three months ended March 31, 2019, we recorded a gain of approximately $3.1 million reflecting a decrease in the fair value of the liability-classified warrant primarily due to the decrease in our stock price. 

Other income of $0.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were $0March 31, 2020 reflects interest income on the Company's cash and $3.7 million, respectively. These expenses were incurredcash equivalent balances held in connection with the chapter 11 case. See Note 1 to the financial statements for additional information.


restricted and unrestricted accounts.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2020 and 2019, we incurred pre-tax losses(loss)/income of $9.7$(11.6) million and $25.6$2.1 million, respectively, and a corresponding income tax expensebenefit (provision) of $135,000$2.7 million and $343,000,($0.5) million, respectively. The effective tax rate during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 and 2019 was (1.4)%23.3% and (1.3) %,23.7%, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the periods ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 and 2019 differs from the statutory rate primarily as no income tax benefit was recordeda result of non-deductible executive compensation under IRC Section 162(m) and a non-taxable adjustment for current year operating losses due to the Company’s assessment regarding tax realizabilityfair market value of its deferred tax assets. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, we incurred pre-tax losses of $9.2 million and $29.2 million and corresponding income tax benefit/(expense) of approximately $4,000 and $(8,700), respectively.


Warrant. 

Liquidity and Capital Resources


As of September 30, 2017,March 31, 2020, we had $25.8$77.4 million in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents compared with $28.7$65.2 million at December 31, 2016. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had $19.82019. Additionally, in comparison to $95.7 million of restricted cash and cash equivalents compared with $27.5 million at December 31, 2016.2019, there was no restricted cash as of March 31, 2020 given that the Term Loan was repaid in March 2020.  The restricted cash is utilizedwas available to pay interest, fees and principal related to the Term Loan. The Company voluntarily prepaid the Term Loan on March 13, 2020 in an approximately aggregate amount of $87.2 million, including accrued interest. Upon repayment of the Term Loan, there are no restrictions on the use of our cash and cash equivalents.

Operating Activities

We prepare our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows using the indirect method. Under this method, we reconcile net (loss) income to cash flows from operating activities by adjusting net (loss) income for those items that impact net income (loss) but may not result in actual cash receipts or payments during the period. These reconciling items include but are not limited to stock-based compensation, loss on the extinguishment of the Term Loan, deferred income taxes, non-cash interest expense and changes in the fair value of our warrant liability, gains and losses from various transactions and changes in the condensed consolidated balance sheet for working capital from the beginning to the end of the period.

Net cash provided by operations for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019 was $3.3 million and less than $0.1 million, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2020, we incurred $2.1 million of cash interest expense on the Term Loan, as it becomes due and $5.0used approximately $3.2 million in support of ordinary course working capital (accounts receivable, accounts payable, prepaids, among other items). Additionally, cash was used for customary operating activities. These cash uses were partially offset by the restricted cash may be withdrawn after June 30, 2018 uponreceipt of approximately $11.2 million from BARDA in connection with the satisfactionprocurement of certain conditions. See Note 8 to the financial statements for additional information.


The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern and contemplate the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. See Note 1 to the financial statements for a detailed explanation of the Company's liquidity.

Operating Activities
Net cash used in operationsraw materials for the ninemanufacture of at least 363,070 courses of oral TPOXX®. For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $2.6 million and $90.9 million, respectively.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,March 31, 2019, we received $8.5approximately $7.1 million from BARDA for product delivery, whichdelivery. This receipt was largely offset by recurringnet operating costs and $4.8 million of payments to contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”) for the manufacture and related support of TPOXX®. Cash usage in 2016 was primarily related to: $115 million of payments made to PharmAthene (to be applied against the PharmAthene liability); $7.5 million of interest payments that were made to PharmAthene during the nine months ended September, 30 2016; recurring operating costs; costs attendant to the Loan Agreement and Rights Offering, and the administration of the chapter 11 case; pre-petition claim payments; $23 million of payments to CMOs for the manufacture and related support of TPOXX®. These amounts were partially offset by $74.3approximately $2.8 million of cash received from BARDA for product deliveries of TPOXX® and achieving a milestone underinterest expense on the BARDA contract.  

Term Loan. 

Investing Activities

For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 and 20162019, we used cash usagein the amounts of approximately $54,000$15,501 and $11,000,$8,951, respectively, related tofor capital expenditures.


Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was $86.9 million, which was attributable to our voluntary prepayment of the Term Loan, of which approximately $85.9 million is recorded as a financing activity, and our repurchase of 0.2 million shares of common stock for approximately $1.0 million. Net cash used by financing activities for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2019 was approximately $250,000. Cash was used$56,590, which is attributable to repurchase $193,000the payment of tax obligations for employee common stock to meet minimum statutory tax withholding requirements for restricted shares issued to employees and to buy back $84,000 of options at intrinsic value. During the nine months ended September, 30 2016, we paid approximately $1.3 million in connection with the Term Loan and Rights Offering; both of which were completed in November 2016.


tendered. 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

18

Recently Issued Accounting Standards


For discussion regarding the impact of accounting standards that were recently issued but not yet effective, on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements, as well as those standards that were adopted, see Note 2, Recently Issues Summary of Significant Accounting Standards,Policies, of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


Safe Harbor Statement


Certain statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including certain statements contained in “Business” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995,1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including statements relating to the progress of SIGA’s development programs and time linestimelines for bringing products to market, delivering products to the U.S. Strategic National Stockpile and the enforceability of the 2011 BARDA Contract.Contract and the 19C BARDA Contract (each as defined previously, and collectively, the "BARDA Contracts") with BARDA. The words or phrases “can be,” “expects,” “may affect,” “may depend,” “believes,” “estimate,” “project” and similar words and phrases are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements are subject to various known and unknown risks and uncertainties and SIGA cautions you that any forward-looking information provided by or on behalf of SIGA is not a guarantee of future performance. SIGA’s actual results could differ materially from those anticipated by such forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, some of which are beyond SIGA’s control, including, but not limited to, (i) the risk that BARDA elects, in its sole discretion as permitted under the BARDA Contracts, not to exercise all, or any, of the remaining unexercised options under those contracts, (ii) the risk that SIGA may not complete performance under the BARDA Contracts on schedule or in accordance with contractual terms, (iii) the risk that the BARDA Contracts are modified or canceled at the request or requirement of the U.S. government, (iv) the risk that the nascent international biodefense market does not develop to a degree that allows SIGA to successfully market TPOXX® internationally, (v) the risk that potential products, including potential alternative uses or formulations of TPOXX® that appear promising to SIGA or its collaborators, cannot be shown to be efficacious or safe in subsequent pre-clinical or clinical trials, (ii)(vi) the risk that SIGA or its collaborators will not obtain appropriate or necessary governmental approvals to market these or other potential products (iii) the risk that SIGA may not be able to obtain anticipated funding for its development projects or other needed funding, including from anticipated governmental contracts and grants (iv) the risk that SIGA may not complete performance under the BARDA Contract on schedule or in accordance with contractual terms, (v)uses, (vii) the risk that SIGA may not be able to secure or enforce sufficient legal rights in its products, including intellectual property protection, (vi)(viii) the risk that any challenge to SIGA’s patent and other property rights, if adversely determined, could affect SIGA’s business and, even if determined favorably, could be costly, (vii)(ix) the risk that regulatory requirements applicable to SIGA’s products may result in the need for further or additional testing or documentation that will delay or prevent seeking or obtaining needed approvals to market these products, (viii) the risk that one or more protests could be filed and upheld in whole or in part or other governmental action taken, in either case leading to a delay of performance under the BARDA Contract or other governmental contracts, (ix) the risk that the BARDA Contract is modified or canceled at the request or requirement of the U.S. government, (x) the risk that the volatile and competitive nature of the biotechnology industry may hamper SIGA’s efforts to develop or market its products, (xi) the risk that changes in domestic andor foreign economic and market conditions may affect SIGA��sSIGA’s ability to advance its research or may affect its products adversely, (xii) the effect of federal, state, and foreign regulation, including drug regulation and international trade regulation, on SIGA’s businesses, (xiii) the risk that the COVID-19 pandemic could impact SIGA’s operations by disrupting SIGA’s supply chain for the manufacture of TPOXX®, causing delays in SIGA’s research and development activities, causing delays or the re-allocation of funding in connection with SIGA’s government contracts, or diverting the attention of government staff overseeing SIGA’s government contracts and (xiv) the risk that the U.S. Government'sgovernment’s responses (including inaction) to the national andor global economic situation or infectious disease such as COVID-19 may affect SIGA'sSIGA’s business adversely, as well as the risks and (xiv)uncertainties included in Item 1A “Risk Factors” on Form 10-K for the risk that some amounts received and recorded as deferred revenue ultimately many not be recognized as revenue.fiscal year ended December 31, 2019. All such forward-looking statements are current only as of the date on which such statements were made. SIGA does not undertake any obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which any such statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.


More detailed information about SIGA and risk factors that may affect the realization of forward-looking statements, including the forward-looking statements in thisthe presentation, is set forth in SIGA’sSIGA's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and SIGA’sSIGA's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,2019, and in other documents that SIGA has filed with the SEC. SIGA urges investors and security holders to read those documents free of charge at the SEC’sSEC's Web site at http://www.sec.gov. In addition, our website can be found on the internet at www.siga.com. The website contains information about us and our operations. Copies of each of our filings with the SEC on Form 10-K, Form 10-Q, and Form 8-K, and all amendments to those reports, can be viewed and downloaded free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports and amendments are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. To view the reports, access www.siga.com, click on “Investor Relations” and “Financial Information.” The information contained on, or that may be accessed through, our website or any social media accounts associated with us or our personnel is not incorporated by reference into, and is not a part of, this report. Forward-looking statements are current only as of the date on which such statements were made, and except for our ongoing obligations under the United States of America federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise.


Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our investment portfolio includes cash and cash equivalents. Our main investment objectives are the preservation of investment capital and the maximization of after-tax returns on our investment portfolio.capital. We believe that our investment policy is conservative, both in the duration of our investments and the credit quality of the investments we hold. We do not utilize derivative financial instruments, derivative commodity instruments or other market risk sensitive instruments, positions or transactions to manage exposure to interest rate changes. As such, we believe that, the securities we hold are subject to market risk, changes in the financial standing of the issuer of such securities and our interest income is sensitive to changes in the general level of U.S. interest rates. Additionally, we are also subject to the risk of rising  LIBOR rates; in the event that the minimum rate among one-month, two-month, three-month and six-month LIBOR rates (“minimum LIBOR rate”) is above 1%, then the interest rate charged on the Term Loan could increase materially depending on the magnitude of any increase in LIBOR rates.  For every increase of 0.50% in the minimum LIBOR rate (e.g. an increase from a LIBOR rate of 1.25% to 1.75%), annual interest payments on the


Term Loan would increase by $405,556.  Furthermore, we are subject to the impact of stock price fluctuations of our common stock in that we have a liability classifiedliability-classified warrant in which 2.71.5 million shares of SIGA common stock can be purchased at a strike price of $1.50.$1.50 per share. For every $1 increase in the stock price of SIGA, the intrinsic value of the liability classifiedliability-classified warrant will increase by $2.7approximately $1.5 million.

Item 4.4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2017.March 31, 2020. The term “disclosure controls and procedures” is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Management recognizes that any disclosure controls and procedures no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives and management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 at a reasonable level of assurance.


Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2017March 31, 2020 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 


Item 1.1.Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we may be involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations and proceedings arising from the ordinary course of our business, collections claims, breach of contract claims, labor and employment claims, tax and other matters. Although such claims, suits, investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the resolution of such current pending matters, if any, will not have a material adverse effect on our business, condensed consolidated financial position, or results of operations or cash flow. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us because of legal costs, diversion of management resources and other factors.


Item 1A.1A. Risk Factors

Our results of operations and financial conditionscondition are subject to numerous risks and uncertainties described in our 20162019 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.


.

Item 2.2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


None.

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period

 

Total Number of Shares Purchased

  

Average Price Paid per Share

  

Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Program

  

Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Program

 

January 1, 2020 to January 31, 2020

  -  $-   -  $- 

February 1, 2020 to February 29, 2020

  -   -   -   - 

March 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020

  225,094   4.41   225,094   49,006,625 
   225,094  $4.41   225,094  $49,006,625 

On March 5, 2020, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had authorized a share repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase, from time to time, up to an aggregate of $50 million of the Company’s common stock through December 31, 2021. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors, including: exercise of procurement options under government contracts; alternative opportunities for strategic uses of cash; the stock price of the Company’s common stock; market conditions; and other corporate liquidity requirements and priorities. Prior to executing any repurchases under this program, the Company’s current term loan needed to be fully repaid or its terms needed to be amended to allow for share repurchases. 

Item 3.3. Defaults upon Senior Securities


None.


Item 4.4.Mine Safety Disclosures


No disclosure is required pursuant to this item.


Item 5.5. Other Information

No disclosure is required pursuant to this item.

20

Item 6.6.Exhibits

Exhibit No.

Description

10.1Amendment of Solicitation/Modification of Contract 0004, dated February 4, 2020, to Agreement, dated September 10, 2018 by and between SIGA and the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (certain portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to Rule 601(b)(10) of Regulation S-K. The omitted information is (i) not material and (ii) would likely cause competitive harm to the registrant if publicly disclosed)
Exhibit
No.
Description

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

Amendment to Credit Agreement dated August 29, 2017
Commercial Lease Agreement for Corvallis, Oregon date November 3, 2017
101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

21


SIGA TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Registrant)

Date:

November 7, 2017

May 6, 2020

By:

/s/ Daniel J. Luckshire

Daniel J. Luckshire

Executive Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer and

Principal Accounting Officer)


25
22