UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q


(Mark One) 
xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011March 31, 2012
 OR
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIESEXCHANGESECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from                             to                           

Commission File Number33-251256-D033-25126-D

MedefileMedeFile International, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada 85-0368333
State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization Identification No.)

301 Yamato Rd, SteSuite 1200
Boca Raton, FL  33431
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (781) 497-2900(561) 912-3393

Copies to:
Richard A. Friedman, Esq.
Jeff Cahlon, Esq.
Sichenzia Ross Friedman Ference LLP
61 Broadway, 32 nd Floor
New York, New York 10006
Phone: (212) 930-9700
Fax: (212) 930-9725


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ox No o
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   x Yes   o   No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 Large accelerated filero Accelerated filer
o
 Non-accelerated filero Smaller reporting company
x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes  o No x

Number of shares outstanding of registrant’s class of common stock, par value $0.0001 (the "Common Stock"“Common Stock”), as of AugustMay 15, 2011: 3,900,354,431.
2012: 52,920,494,067.
 
 
1
 



Explanatory Note

Medefile International, Inc. is not subject to the filing requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), and files reports with the SEC voluntarily. Medefile International, Inc. has filed all Exchange Act reports for the preceding 12 months.
2

Table of Contents

 Page
PART I 
  
FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
ITEM 1. Financial Statements.Statements
4
3-13
ITEM 2. ManagementManagement’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
Operations
14
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.
Risk
19
16
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures.
Procedures
19
16
  
PART II
20
  
OTHER INFORMATION
20
ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings.
Proceedings
20
17
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors.
Factors
20
17
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Proceeds
20
17
ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Securities
20
17
ITEM 4. Reserved.
Mine Safety Disclosures
20
17
ITEM 5. Other Information.
Information
20
17
ITEM 6. Exhibits.
Exhibits
21
17
Signatures
22
18





 
32
 


Item 1. Financial Statements.
Medefile International, Inc. 
Consolidated Balance Sheets 
       
  Unaudited    
  March 31,  December 31, 
Assets 2012  2011 
Current assets        
Cash $30,344  $198,173 
Accounts receivable, net  1,893   617 
Inventory  53,859   53,925 
Merchant services reserve  64,320   62,530 
Prepaid insurance  -   1,055 
Total current assets  150,416   316,300 
Website development, net of accumulated amortization  20,982   26,227 
Furniture and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation  7,927   10,278 
Intangibles  1,339   1,339 
Total assets $180,664  $354,144 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $200,589  $180,244 
Cash overdraft  -   - 
Deferred revenues  6,894   9,855 
Total Current Liabilities  207,483   190,099 
         
         
Stockholders' Equity        
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value: 10,000,000 authorized,        
no shares issued and outstanding  -   - 
Common stock, $.0001 par value: 75,000,000,000 authorized;        
4,019,830,281 and 3,958,258,852 shares issued and outstanding on        
March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively  401,983   395,826 
Common stock payable  -   24,000 
Additional paid in capital  18,046,851   17,986,149 
Accumulated deficit  (18,475,653)  (18,241,930)
Total stockholders' equity  (26,819)  164,045 
Total liability and stockholders' equity $180,664  $354,144 
         
         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements 
3
Medefile International, Inc. 
Consolidated Statements of Operations 
(Unaudited) 
       
  For the Three  For the Three 
  Months  Months 
  Ended  Ended 
  March 31,  March 31, 
  2012  2011 
Revenue $13,714  $132,102 
         
Cost of goods sold  66   63,475 
Gross profit  13,648   68,627 
         
Operating expenses        
Selling, general and administrative expenses  239,774   379,120 
Marketing expense  -   129,854 
Depreciation and amortization expense  7,597   7,846 
Total operating expenses  247,371   516,820 
         
Loss from operations  (233,723)  (448,193)
         
Other income (expenses)  -   - 
         
Loss before income tax  (233,723)  (448,193)
Provision for income tax  -   - 
Net loss $(233,723) $(448,193)
         
Net loss per share: basic and diluted $(0.00) $(0.00)
         
Weighted average share outstanding  3,977,538,217   3,450,021,410 
basic and diluted        
         
         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements 

MedeFile International, Inc
Condensed Balance Sheets

       
  Unaudited    
  June 30,  December 31, 
Assets 2011  2010 
Current assets      
Cash $311,975  $499,652 
Inventory  27,904   22,184 
Merchant services reserve  53,267   6,173 
Accounts receivable, net  2,810   2,468 
Prepaid Insurance  4,494   - 
Total current assets  400,450   530,477 
Website development, net of accumulated amortization  36,718   47,210 
Furniture and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation  15,251   20,364 
Investment  1,800   - 
Intangibles  1,339   1,339 
Total assets $455,558  $599,390 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $244,379  $310,325 
Cash overdraft  -   6,928 
Deferred revenues  6,721   9,575 
Total Current Liabilities  251,100   326,828 
         
         
Stockholders' Equity        
Preferred stock, $.0001 par value: 10,000 authorized,        
no shares issued and outstanding  -   - 
Common stock, $.0001 par value: 5,000,000,000 authorized;        
3,678,049,471 and 3,450,021,410 shares issued and outstanding on        
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively  367,805   345,002 
Common stock payable  159,000   - 
Additional paid in capital  16,951,638   16,090,116 
Accumulated deficit  (17,273,985)  (16,162,556)
Total stockholders' equity  204,458   272,562 
Total liability and stockholders' equity $455,558  $599,390 
         
         

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements


 
4
 
 
MedeFile International, Inc
Medefile International, Inc. 
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 
(Unaudited) 
  For the Three  For the Three 
  Months  Months 
  Ended  Ended 
  March 31,  March 31, 
  2012  2011 
Cash flows from operating activities      
Net loss $(233,723) $(448,193)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net        
cash used in operating activities        
Depreciation  2,352   7,847 
Amortization  5,245     
Stock based services  42,859   37,500 
         
Changes in operating assets and liabilities        
Accounts receivable  (1,276)  (1,523)
Inventory  66   1,766 
Prepaid insurance  1,055   - 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  20,344   62,943 
Merchant services reserve  (1,790)  (4,777)
Cash overdraft  -   7,019 
Deferred revenue  (2,961)  (2,036)
Net Cash used in operating activities  (167,829)  (339,454)
Cash flows from investing activities        
Investment      (1,800)
Net cash used in investing activities  -   (1,800)
Cash flow from financing activities        
Proceeds from common stock subscription  -   230,000 
Net cash provided by financing activities  -   230,000 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (167,829)  (111,254)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  198,173   499,652 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $30,344  $388,398 
         
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information        
Cash paid during period for        
Cash paid for interest $-  $- 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $- 
Cancellation of payroll liability to CEO $-  $116,000 
  
  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements 
Condensed Statements of Operations
(unaudited)

             
  For the Three  For the Three  For the Six  For the Six 
  Months  Months  Months  Months 
  Ended  Ended  Ended  Ended 
  June 30,  June 30,  June 30,  June 30, 
  2011  2010  2011  2010 
Revenue $187,740  $4,242  $319,842  $6,602 
                 
Cost of goods sold  90,267   -   153,741   - 
Gross profit  97,473   4,242   166,101   6,602 
                 
Operating expenses                
Selling, general and administrative expenses  442,085   101,135   821,205   180,309 
Maketing expense  310,867   -   440,721   - 
Depreciation and amortization expense  7,758   9,441   15,604   13,692 
Total operating expenses  760,710   110,576   1,277,530   194,001 
                 
Loss from operations  (663,237)  (106,334)  (1,111,429)  (187,399)
                 
Other expenses                
Interest expense  - note payable  -   (3,879)  -   (10,166)
Interest expense - related party note payable  -   (1,216,445)  -   (1,219,633)
Total other expenses  -   (1,220,324)  -   (1,229,799)
                 
Loss before income tax  (663,237)  (1,326,658)  (1,111,429)  (1,417,198)
Provision for income tax  -   -   -   - 
Net Loss $(663,237) $(1,326,658) $(1,111,429) $(1,417,198)
                 
Net loss per share: basic and diluted $(0.00) $(0.00) $(0.00) $(0.00)
                 
Weighted average share outstanding  3,584,124,074   1,463,021,410   3,517,124,825   1,463,021,410 
basic and diluted                
                 


The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements


 
5
 

MedeFile International, Inc
Consdensed Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)

       
  For the  For the 
  Six  Six 
  Months  Months 
  Ended  Ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2011  2010 
Cash flows from operating activities      
Net loss $(1,111,429) $(1,417,198)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net        
cash used in operating activities        
Depreciation  5,113   8,447 
Amortization  10,492   5,245 
Stock based services  139,643   - 
Warrant expense  25,682   - 
Interest expense  -   10,166 
Interest expense - related party  -   1,219,633 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities        
Accounts receivable  (342)  (2,976)
Inventory  (5,720)  (28,330)
Prepaid Insurance  (4,494)  - 
Deposits and other assets  -   14,465 
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities  50,054   (79,261)
Merchant services reserve  (47,094)  - 
Cash overdraft  (6,928)  (862)
Deferred revenue  (2,854)  5,079 
Net Cash used in operating activities  (947,877)  (265,592)
Cash flows from investing activities        
Investment  (1,800)  - 
Website development  -   (21,800)
Net cash used in investing activities  (1,800)  (21,800)
Cash flow from financing activities        
Proceeds from common stock subscription  159,000   1,000,000 
Proceeds from common stock sale  603,000   - 
Proceeds from note payable  -   340,842 
Net cash provided by financing activities  762,000   1,340,842 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (187,677)  1,053,450 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  499,652   1,513 
Cash and cash equvalents at end of period $311,975  $1,054,963 
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information        
Cash paid during period for        
Cash paid for interest $-  $- 
Cash paid for income taxes $-  $- 
Cancellation of payroll liability to CEO $116,000  $- 
Common stock issued for consulting services $165,325  $- 
Conversion of note payable and accrued interest $-  $900,000 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements 
         




6



Medefile International, Inc.
Notes to CondensedConsolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
 
 
1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS OPERATIONS

Basis of Presentation
 
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of MedefileMedeFile International Inc., a Nevada corporation (the "Company" or "Medefile"), have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete consolidated financial statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes should be read in conjunction with the Company's Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.201. In the opinion of management, these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments that are of a normal recurring nature and which are necessary to present fairly the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2011,March 31, 2012, and the results of operations and cash flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 and 2010.2011. The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire fiscal year.

Nature of Business Operations
 
MedefileMedeFile International, Inc., has developed and globally markets a proprietary, patient-centric, Internet-enabled Personal Health Record (iPHR) system for gathering, digitizing, maintaining, accessing and sharing an individual’s actual medical records. Medefile'sMedeFile's goal is to revolutionize the medical industry by bringing patient-centric digital technology to the business of medicine. MedefileMedeFile intends to accomplish its objective by providing individuals with a simple and secure way to access their lifetime of actual medical records in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Medefile'sMedeFile's products and services are designed to provide healthcare providers with the ability to reference their patient'spatients’ actual past medical records, thereby ensuring the most accurate treatment and services possible while simultaneously reducing redundant procedures.

Interoperable with most electronic medical record systems utilized by physician practices, clinics, hospitals and other care providers, the highly secure, feature-rich MedeFile iPHR solution has been designed to gather all of its members’ actual medical records on behalf of each member, and create a single, comprehensive Electronic Health Record (EHR). The member can access his/her records 24-hours a day, seven days a week – or authorize a third party user – on any web-enabled device (PC, cell phone, PDA, e-reader, et al), as well as the portable MedeFile flash drive/keychain or branded UBS-bracelet.

By subscribing to the MedeFile system, not only do members empower themselves to take control of their own health and well-being, they empower their healthcare providers to make sound and lifesaving decisions with the most accurate, up-to-date medical information available.  In addition, with MedeFile, members enjoy the peace of mind that comes from knowing that their medical records are protected from fire, natural disaster, document misplacement or the closing of a medical or dental practice.

MedeFile believes it enjoys a number of competitive advantages over other firms within the medical records marketplace, including:

●MedeFile has developed products and services geared to the patient, while containing the depth and breadth of information required by treating physicians and medical personnel.
●MedeFile does all the work of collecting and updating medical information on an ongoing basis; its dependence on the  patient taking action is minimal – particularly when compared to patient action required to support competing solutions.

●MedeFile provides a complete medical record. Other companies claim complete longitudinal records, but in reality only provide histories (usually completed by the member/patient), and are by no means complete or necessarily accurate records.
●MedeFile provides a coherent mix of services and products that are intended to affect the quality of healthcare by enabling the patient to manage and access the information normally retained by doctors and other care providers.
6

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared contemplating a continuation of the Company as a going concern. However, the Company has reported a net loss of $1,111,429$233,723 for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 and $2,492,310$2,079,374 for the year ended December 31, 20102011 and had an accumulated deficit of $17,273,985$18,475,653 as of June 30, 2011.March 31, 2012.  The Company has net negative working capital of $149,350$57,067 as of June 30, 2011.March 31, 2012.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The operating losses raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The Company's ability to obtain additional financing depends on the availability of its borrowing capacity, the success of its growth strategy and its future performance, each of which is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond the Company's control.
We will need additional investments in order to continue operations to cash flow break even. Additional investments are being sought, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain such investments. Financing transactions may include the issuance of equity or debt securities, obtaining credit facilities or other financing mechanisms.

However, the trading price of our common stock could make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of these financial statements, cash and cash equivalents includes highly liquid debt instruments with maturity of less than three months.
7
 
Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments and related items, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents. The Company places its cash and temporary cash investments with high credit quality institutions. At times, such investments may be in excess of the FDIC insurance limit.  Currently our operating account is not above the FDIC limit.

Advertising

The Company follows the policy of charging the costs of advertising to expense as incurred. The Company incurred advertising costs for the three months ended June 30,March 31, 2012 and 2011 and 2010 of approximately $6,500$0 and $0, respectively.  The Company incurred advertising costs for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 of approximately $6,500 and $2,568, respectively.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.
 
The Company records net deferred tax assets to the extent the Company believes these assets will more likely than not be realized. In making such determination, the Company considers all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and recent financial operations. A valuation allowance is established against deferred tax assets that do not meet the criteria for recognition. In the event the Company were to determine that it would be able to realize deferred income tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, the Company would make an adjustment to the valuation allowance which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
 
The Company follows the accounting guidance which provides that a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position may be recognized when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold at the effective date to be recognized initially and in subsequent periods. Also included is guidance on measurement, recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transitiontransition.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. When retired or otherwise disposed, the related carrying value and accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and the net difference less any amount realized from disposition, is reflected in earnings. Minor additions and renewals are expensed in the year incurred. Major additions and renewals are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives being 3three years up to 10ten years.
7

Trademark Costs

Trademark costs incurred in the registration and acquisition of trademarks and trademark rights are capitalized. These costs will be amortized over the legal life of the related trademark once the trademark is awarded. The Company performs an annual review of its identified intangible assets to determine if facts and circumstances exist which indicate that the useful life is shorter than originally estimated or that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable.

The Company expenses all software costs associated with the conceptual formulation and evaluation of alternatives until the application development stage has been reached. Costs to improve or support the technology are expensed as these costs are incurred.

Website Development

The Company's policy is to capitalize website development costs at original cost and amortize the balance over the life of the product.website.  The life of website is determined at completion of the project. The Company reviews the amounts capitalized for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of the assets may not be recoverable.

The Company expenses all development costs associated with the conceptual formulation and evaluation of alternatives until the application development stage has been reached. Costs to improve or support the technology are expensed as these costs are incurred.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates revenue from licensing the right to utilize its proprietary software for the storage and distribution of healthcare information to individuals and affinity groups. For revenue from product sales, the Company recognizes revenue based on four basic criteria which must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Determination of criteria (3) and (4) are based on management's judgments regarding the fixed nature of the selling prices of the products delivered and the collectability of those amounts. Provisions for discounts and rebates to customers, estimated returns and allowances, and other adjustments are provided for in the same period the related sales are recorded.
8

Deferred Revenue

The Company generally receives subscription fees for its services. From time to time, the Company will receive quarterly or annual subscriptions paid in advance and deferred revenue is recorded at that time. The deferred revenue is amortized into revenue on a pro- rata basis each month. Customers with quarterly or annual subscriptions may cancel their subscriptions and request a refund for future months' revenues at any time. Therefore, a liability is recorded to reflect the amounts that are potentially refundable.  As of June 30,At March 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company had $6,721 in deferred revenue.revenue totaled $6,894 and $7,539, respectively.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made in prior periods financial statements to conform to classifications used in the current period.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

InOn January 2010,1, 2012, the FASBCompany adopted changes issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-06: Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (topic 820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements..  This ASU requires additional disclosuresBoard (FASB) to conform existing guidance regarding significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2 of fair value measurements, including a descriptionmeasurement and disclosure between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. These changes both clarify the FASB’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement and disclosure requirements and amend certain principles or requirements for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The clarifying changes relate to the application of the reasonshighest and best use and valuation premise concepts, measuring the fair value of an instrument classified in a reporting entity’s shareholders’ equity, and disclosure of quantitative information about unobservable inputs used for the transfers.  Further, this ASU requires additional disclosures for the activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, requiringmeasurements. The amendments relate to measuring the fair value of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio; application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement; and additional disclosures concerning the valuation processes used and sensitivity of the fair value measurement to changes in unobservable inputs for those items categorized as Level 3, a reporting entity’s use of a nonfinancial asset in a way that differs from the asset’s highest and best use, and the categorization by level in the fair value hierarchy for items required to be measured at fair value for disclosure purposes only. Other than the additional disclosure requirements, the adoption of these changes had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted changes issued by the FASB to the presentation of information about purchases, sales, issuances,comprehensive income. These changes give an entity the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income, and settlementsthe components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements; the reconciliationoption to present components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity was eliminated. The items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income were not changed. Additionally, no changes were made to the calculation and presentation of earnings per share. Management elected to present the two-statement option. Other than the change in presentation, the adoption of these changes had no impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) released Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10 (“ASU 2011-10”), Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360): Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate—a Scope Clarification (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). ASU 2011-10 clarifies when a parent (reporting entity) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of default on the subsidiary’s nonrecourse debt, the reporting entity should apply the guidance for fair value measurements.  ThisReal Estate Sale (Subtopic 360-20). The provisions of ASU is2011-10 are effective for public companies for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years.  We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU, however, we do not expect the adoption of this ASU to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-20:, Receivables (Topic 310) Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses.  The ASU amends FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 310, Receivables, to improve the disclosures that an entity provides about the credit quality of its financing receivables and the related allowance for credit losses.  As a result of these amendments, an entity is required to disaggregate, by portfolio segment or class of financing receivables, certain existing disclosures and provide certain new disclosures about its financing receivables and related allowance for credit losses.  This ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December 15, 2010.  The adoption of this standard may require additional disclosures, but we do not expect the adoption to have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

On December 21, 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-29: Business Combinations (Topic 805) which impacts any public entity that enters into business combinations that are material on an individual or aggregate basis. The guidance specifies that if a public entity presents comparative financial statements, the entity should disclose revenues and earnings of the combined entity as though the business combination(s) that occurred during the year had occurred at the beginning of the prior annual period when preparing the pro forma financial information for both the current and prior reporting periods. The guidance also requires that pro forma disclosures be accompanied by a narrative description regarding the nature and amount of material, nonrecurring pro forma adjustments directly attributable to the business combination included in reported pro forma revenues and earnings. This guidance is effective for business combinations consummated in periods beginning after December 15, 2010.  We do not believe the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements

In April 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-02, “Receivables (Topic 310): A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring”. This amendment explains which modifications constitute troubled debt restructurings (“TDR”). Under the new guidance, the definition of a troubled debt restructuring remains essentially unchanged, and for a loan modification to be considered a TDR, certain basic criteria must still be met. For public companies, the new guidance is effective for interim and annual periodsyears, beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively2012. When adopted, ASU 2011-10 is not expected to restructuring occurring on or after the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Company does not expect that the guidance effective in future periods will have a materialmaterially impact on itsour consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, FASB issued ASU 2011-04 “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs.” The amendments in this update result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs. Consequently, the amendments change the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For many of the requirements, the Board does not intend for the amendments in this update to result in a change in the application of the requirements in Topic 820. Some of the amendments clarify the Board’s intent about the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. For public entities, the new guideline is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and should be applied prospectively. The Company does not expect that the guidance effective in future periods will have a material impact on its consolidatedthe financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASC Update No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (Topic 820): Presentation of Comprehensive Income. Update No. 2011-05 requires that net income, items of other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income be presented in one continuous statement or two separate consecutive statements. The amendments in this Update also require that reclassifications from other comprehensive income to net income be presented on the face of the financial statements. We are required to adopt Update No. 2011-05 for our first quarter ending March 31, 2012, with the exception of the presentation of reclassifications on the face of the financial statements, which has been deferred by the FASB under ASC Update No. 2011-12, Comprehensive Income (Topic 820): Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. The adoption of Update No. 2011-05 is not expected have a material impact the financial statements.

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) released Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-10 (“ASU 2011-10”), Property, Plant and Equipment (Topic 360): Derecognition of in Substance Real Estate—a Scope Clarification (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). ASU 2011-10 clarifies when a parent (reporting entity) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of default on the subsidiary’s nonrecourse debt, the reporting entity should apply the guidance for Real Estate Sale (Subtopic 360-20). The provisions of ASU 2011-10 are effective for public companies for fiscal years and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2012. When adopted, ASU 2011-10 is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements.

Net Loss andper Share
 
Basic and diluted loss per share amounts are computed based on net loss divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Outstanding optionsWarrants to purchase 5,640,000 common shares and warrants to purchase 10,175,000145,175,000 common shares were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because the assumed conversion and exercise would be anti-dilutive for the sixyear ending December 31, 2011.   Warrants to purchase 8,175,000 common shares and options to purchase 5,640,000 common shares were not included in the computation of diluted loss per share because the assumed conversion and exercise would be anti-dilutive for the three months ended June 30, 2011.  
9
March 31, 2012.

Management Estimates
 
The presentation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Stock BasedStock-Based Compensation
 
The Company accounts for all compensation related to stock, options or warrants using a fair value based method whereby compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. The Company uses the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the fair value of options and warrants issued to both employees and non-employees. Stock issued for compensation is valued using the market price of the stock on the date of the related agreementagreement.
9


2.  ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Due to the collection history of the Company, an allowance for doubtful accounts is not maintained.  Recognition of a specific uncollectible account is written directly against the invoice in accounts receivable and expensed in the current period.

3.   WEBSITE DEVELOPMENT

Website development consists of the following:

 
June 30,
 2011
  
December 31,
2010
  
March 31,
 2012
  December 31, 2011 
Website development $62,945  $62,946  $62,946  $62,946 
Accumulated amortization  (26,227)  (15,736)  (41,964)  (36,719)
Net website development $36,718  $47,210  $20,982  $26,227 

Amortization is calculated over a three-year period beginning in the second quarter of 2010.  Amortization expense for the three-three months ending June 30,ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and 2010 is $5,245 and $0, respectively.  Amortization expense for the six- months ending June 30, 2011 and 2010 is $10,491 and $5,245, respectively.

4. FURNITURE AND EQUIPMENT

Furniture and equipment consists of the following:
 
 
June 30,
2011
  
December 31,
2010
  March 31, 2012  
December 31,
2011
 
Computers and equipment
 $169,286  $169,286  $169,286  $169,286 
Furniture and fixtures
  38,618   38,618   38,618   38,618 
Subtotal
  207,904   207,904   207,904   207,904 
Less: accumulated depreciation
  (192,653)  (187,540   (199,977)  (197,626)
Net furniture and equipment
 $15,251  $20,364  $7,927  $10,278 
 
Depreciation is calculated by using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life.   Depreciation expense totaled $2,513$2,352 and $4,196$2,600 for the three months ended June 30,March 31, 2012 and 2011, and 2010, respectively.   Depreciation expense totaled $5,113 and $8,446 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
10

5. EQUITY

Common Stock
In June 2010, the Company accepted an agreement for an aggregate of 1,000,000,000 shares of its Common Stock for a per share purchase price of $0.001 per share (the “June Private Placement”).  The Company received aggregate proceeds of $1,000,000 from its June Private Placement.  The shares were unissued as of June 30, 2010 and are recorded through Common Stock Payable.  The shares were issued July 20, 2010.

During the first quarter 2011, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement forSecurities Purchase Agreement, pursuant to which the sale ofCompany sold 201,000,000 shares of Common Stockcommon stock at a purchase price of $0.003 per share.  Total proceeds from the sale of the Common Stockstock totaled $603,000.

On March 31, 2011, the Company issued 9,375,000 shares of Common Stockcommon stock for amounts due to consultant.  The shares had a market value of $37,500.

On May 6,April 29, 2011, the Company issued 7,653,061 shares of Common Stockcommon stock for amounts due to consultants.a consultant.  The shares had a market value of $32,143.

On May 13,11, 2011, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of Common Stockcommon stock for amounts due to consultants.  The shares had a market value of $70,000.
On May 24, 2010, Lyle Hauser, the son of the Company's then Chief Executive Officer, agreed to convert notes in the aggregate principal amount of $900,000 into an aggregate of 450,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock.  As of June 30, 2010, the conversion to common shares had not occurred.  The amount to be converted is reported in Common Stock Payable on the balance sheet.  The shares were issued on July 20, 2010.

During the first quarter 2011, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreementSecurities Purchase Agreement for the sale of 45,000,000 shares of Common Stockcommon stock at a purchase price of $0.003 per share.   The funds were received during the first quarter of 2011 and recorded as a stock payable in the amount of $135,000 as of June 30, 2011.  On July 8, 2011, 45,000,000 shares of Common Stockcommon stock were issued.

On June 3, 2011, the Company received $24,000 from proceeds from a securities purchase agreementSecurities Purchase Agreement for the purchase of 8,000,000 shares of Common Stock.common stock.  On March 15, 2012 the Company issued the 8,000,000 shares of common stock in accordance with the Securities Purchase Agreement and the shares of common stock were issued against the remaining balance in Stock Payable.
10
.
During the third quarter of 2011, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement pursuant to which it sold 177,304,960 shares of common stock at a purchase price of $0.00282

On August 1, 2011, the Company issued 11,029,421 shares of common stock for amounts due to consultant.  The shares had a market value of $33,088.

On November 1, 2011, the Company issued 46,875,000 shares of common stock is currently unissued and $24,000 is recorded asfor amounts due to consultants.  The shares had a market value of $42,187.50.

On March 1, 2012, the Company issued 53,571,429 shares of common stock payableto a consultant. The market value of the shares was $42,859,

Stock Options

2006 Incentive Stock Plan

In January 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company (the "Board") approved an Incentive Stock Plan, pursuant to which they have initially reserved 10,000,000 shares of common Stock for issuance. Under the 2006 Incentive Stock, the Board has granted an aggregate of 5,640,000 options to employees pursuant to certain employment agreement that are more fully described below:  As of December 31, 2011 all options have expired.

2008 Amended and Restated Incentive Stock Plan

In November 2008, theour Board of Directors adopted the 2008 Equity Incentive Plan and subsequently amended it in January 2009, June 2009 and July 2009 (the “2008 Plan”). The purpose of the 2008 Plan was to provide an incentive to attract and retain directors, officers, consultants, advisors and employees whose services are considered valuable, to encourage a sense of proprietorship and to stimulate an active interest of such persons into our development and financial success. Under the 2008 Plan, the Company is authorized to issue incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the United States Code, (the "code"), non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted stock and long term incentive awards. The 2008 Plan will be administered by theour Board of Directors until such time as such authority has been delegated to a committee of the Board.board of directors.

2010 Incentive Stock Plan

In December 2009, theour Board of Directors adopted the 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Plan”). The purpose of the 2010 Plan was to provide an incentive to attract and retain directors, officers, consultants, advisors and employees whose services are considered valuable, to encourage a sense of proprietorship and to stimulate an active interest of such persons into our development and financial success. Under the 2010 Plan, we are authorized to issue incentive stock options intended to qualify under Section 422 of the Code, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, performance shares, restricted stock and long term incentive awards. The 2010 Plan will be administered by theour Board of Directors until such time as such authority has been delegated to a committee of the Board.Board of Directors.

A summary of option activity under all Plans as of March 31, 2012, and changes during the period then ended are presented below:

  
 
Options
  Weighted-Average Exercise Price 
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
  5,640,000  $0.80 
Issued
  -   - 
Exercised
  5,640,000   0.80 
Forfeited or expired
  -   - 
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
  -  $0.00 
Issued
  -   - 
Expired
  -   - 
Forfeited
  -   - 
Outstanding at March 31, 2012
  -   - 
Non-vested at March 31, 2012
  -   - 
Exercisable at March 31, 2012
  -  $0.00 
 
 
 
11
 

A summary of option activity under all Plans as of June 30, 2010, and changes during the period then ended are presented below:

  
 
Options
  Weighted-Average Exercise Price 
Outstanding at December 31, 2009
  5,640,000  $0.80 
Issued
  -   - 
Exercised
  -   - 
Forfeited or expired
  -   - 
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
  5,640,000  $0.80 
Issued
  -   - 
Expired
  -   - 
Forfeited
  -   - 
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
  5,640,000   0.80 
Non-vested at June 30, 2011
  -   - 
Exercisable at June 30, 2011
  5,640,000  $0.80 

The options outstanding as of June 30, 2011 have been segregated for additional disclosure as follows:
 Options Outstanding Options Exercisable
   Weighted  
  WeightedAverage Weighted
Range of AverageRemaining Average
ExerciseNumberExerciseContractualNumberExercise
PriceOutstandingPriceLifeExercisablePrice
$0.80
5,640,000
$ 0.80
.50
5,640,000
$ 0.80

Stock-based compensation expense recognized during the period is based on the value of the portion of share-based payment awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period.  For the three and six monthsyears ended June 30,December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recorded no compensation expense related to options.

Warrants
  
In October 2007, theThe Company awarded 175,000 Common Stock warrants, at an exercise price of $0.56 per share, to former Board members at the quoted stock price on the effective date of the awards. The warrants have an expiration date of five years from the issue date and contain provisions for a cash exercise. The estimated value of the compensatory warrants granted to non-employees in exchange for services and financing expenses was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions:

Risk-free interest rate at grant date
  
4.75
%
Expected stock price volatility
  
155
%
Expected dividend payout
  
--
 
Expected option in life-years
  
5
 
 
On June 22, 2011, the Company awarded 10,000,000 Common Stock warrants, at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, to consultants for services at the quoted stock price on the effective date of the awards. The warrants have an expiration date of four years from the issue date and contain provisions for a cash exercise. The estimated value of the compensatory warrants granted to non-employees in exchange for services and financing expenses was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the following assumptions:assumptions listed below:

On July 28, 2011, the Company awarded 135,000,000 Common Stock Warrants, at an exercise price of $0.005 per share to consultants for services at the quoted stock price on the effective date of the awards.  The warrants have an expiration date of three years from the issue date and contain provisions for a cash exercise.  The estimated value of the compensatory warrants granted to non-employees in exchange for services was determined using the Black-Scholes pricing model and the assumptions listed below.
Risk-free interest rate at grant date
  
0.39
%
Expected stock price volatility
  
172.1
%
Expected dividend payout
  
--
 
Expected option in life-years
  
24
 

Warrant expense recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $25,682..Transactions involving warrants are summarized as follows:
 
  Number of Warrants  Weighted-Average Price Per Share 
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
  8,175,000  $.73 
Granted
  145,000,000   .01 
Exercised
  -     
Canceled or expired
  8,000,000   .73 
Outstanding at December 31, 2011
  145,175,000  $0.19 
Granted
  -   - 
Exercised
  -   - 
Canceled or expired
  -   - 
Outstanding at March 31, 2012
  145,175,000  $0.019 

 
 
12
 

 
Transactions involving warrants are summarized as follows:
Warrants Outstanding  Warrants Exercisable 
      Weighted        Weighted 
      Average  Weighted     Average 
      Remaining  Average     Remaining 
Exercise  Number  Contractual  Exercise  Number  Contractual 
Prices  Outstanding  Life (years)  Price  Exercisable  Life (years) 
 
$
0.56
   
175,000
   
1.25
  
$
0.56
   
175,000
   
1.25
 
  
0.005
   
135,000,000
   
2.50
   
0.005
   
135,000,000
   
2.50
 
  
0.01
   
10,000,000
   
3.50
   
0.01
   
10,000,000
   
3.50
 
      
145,175,000
   
2.56
  
$
0.56
   
145,175,000
   
2.56
 
 
  Number of Warrants  Weighted-Average Price Per Share 
Outstanding at December 31, 2010
  8,175,000  $.73 
Granted
  10,000,000   .01 
Exercised
  -   - 
Canceled or expired
  7,950,000   - 
Outstanding at June 30, 2011
  10,175,000  $0.019 


Warrants Outstanding  Warrants Exercisable 
      Weighted        Weighted 
      Average  Weighted     Average 
      Remaining  Average     Remaining 
Exercise  Number  Contractual  Exercise  Number  Contractual 
Prices  Outstanding  Life (years)  Price  Exercisable  Life (years) 
 
$
0.56
   
175,000
   
1.75
  
$
0.56
   
175,000
   
1.75
 
  
0.01
   
10,000,000
   
4.0
   
0.01
   
10,000,000
   
4.0
 
      
10,175,000
   
3.96
  
$
0.56
   
10,175,000
   
3.96
 

6. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On May 10, 2011, the Company and the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Kevin Hauser, executed an amendment, effective as of March 26, 2011, to the employment agreement dated December 10, 2008, by and between Mr. Hauser and the Company.  Mr. Hauser agreed to reduce the base salary payable to him pursuant to the employment agreement to $100,000 for the year ending December 31, 2010.  As a result, the Company recorded a cancellation of payroll expense due to Mr. Hauser during the first quarter of 2010 through additional paid in capital in the amount of $116,000.

7.  SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

DuringOn April 10, 2012, the first quarter 2011,Company filed a certificate of designation of Series B Preferred Stock (the “Series B Certificate of Designation”) with the Secretary of State of Nevada, pursuant to which 100,000 shares of the Company’s preferred stock were designated as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”).  Pursuant to the Series B Certificate of Designation, the Series B Preferred Stock:

●
Has a liquidation preference over the common stock equal to the stated value of $1.00 per share.
●
Votes as a single class with the common stock and entitles its holders, for each share of Series B Preferred Stock, to cast such number of votes equal to 0.00051% of the total number of votes entitled to be cast. Accordingly, a holder of all 100,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock will have the right to cast 51% of the total number of votes entitled to be cast.
●
Will automatically convert into common stock at a ratio of 10,000 shares of common stock for each share of Series B Preferred Stock, effective upon the Company’s filing of a certificate of amendment to its articles of incorporation, pursuant to which the Company’s number of authorized shares of common stock will increase to75,000,000,000.

On April 12, 2012, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement for(the “Purchase Agreement”) with Lyle Hauser (the “Preferred Stock Investor”). Lyle Hauser is the saleCompany’s largest shareholder and the brother of 45,000,000Kevin Hauser, the Company’s chief executive officer. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, on April 12, 2012, the Company sold 100,000 shares of CommonSeries B Preferred Stock at ato the Preferred Stock Investor for an aggregate purchase price of $0.003 per share.  Total proceeds from$100,000, and the saleCompany issued four-year warrants to purchase 1,000,000,000 shares of common stock to the Preferred Stock Investor with an exercise price of $0.0001. Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Preferred Stock Investor agreed to vote its shares of Series B Preferred Stock to approve an amendment to the Company’s articles of incorporation to increase the Company’s authorized shares of common stock to 75,000,000,000.

On April 13, 2012, the Preferred Stock Investor voted its 100,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock, representing 51% of the Common Stock totaled $135,000.  The funds were received duringvoting power of the first quarterCompany’s shareholders, to approve an amendment to the Company’s articles of 2011 and on July 8, 2011, 45,000,000incorporation to increase the Company’s number of authorized shares of Common Stock were issued.common stock to 75,000,000,000.

In July 2011,On April 18, 2012, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement forSecurities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with accredited investors (the “Investors”) pursuant to which, on April 18, 2012, the sale of 177,304,960Company sold 5,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock at acommon stock for an aggregate purchase price of $0.00282 per share.  Total proceeds from$500,000, and the saleCompany issued four-year warrants to purchase 5,000,000,000 shares of common stock to the Investors with an exercise price of $0.0001. The Investors were purchasers under the Company’s Securities Purchase Agreements entered into in July 2011.

On April 23, 2012, the Company issued an aggregate of 39,900,663,786 shares of common stock to certain shareholders of the Common Stock totaled $500,000.   OnCompany, in accordance with anti-dilution rights held by such shareholders, including 26,917,968,750 shares to Lyle Hauser, 8,160,000,000 shares to Kevin Hauser, and 4,822,695,036 shares to purchasers under Securities Purchase Agreements entered into by the Company in July 8, 2011,2011. Lyle Hauser is the 177,304,960 shares were issued.Company’s largest shareholder and the brother of Kevin Hauser, the Company’s chief executive officer.
 
 
13
 
 

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

It should be noted that this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations may contain "forward-looking statements." The terms "believe," "anticipate," "intend," "goal," "expect," and similar expressions may identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements represent the Company's current expectations or beliefs concerning future events. The matters covered by these statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements, including the Company's dependence on product introduction and customer acceptance of new products, the impact of competition and price erosion, as well as other risks and uncertainties. The foregoing list should not be construed as exhaustive, and the Company disclaims any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements, or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking information included herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a representation that the strategy, objectives or other plans of the Company will be achieved. The Company wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We undertake no duty to update this information. More information about potential factors that could affect our business and financial results is included in the section entitled "Risk Factors" of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20102011 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 1, 2011.16, 2012. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements provided in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.

OVERVIEW

Organizational History

On November 1, 2005, Bio-Solutions International, Inc. ("Bio-Solutions") entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the "Agreement") with OmniMed Acquisition Corp., (the "Aquirer")"Acquirer), a Nevada corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Bio-Solutions, OmniMed International, Inc., a Nevada corporation ("OmniMed"), and the shareholders of OmniMed (the "OmniMed Shareholders"). Pursuant to the Agreement, Bio-Solutions acquired all of the outstanding equity stock of OmniMed from the OmniMed Shareholders. As consideration for the acquisition of OmniMed, Bio-Solutions agreed to issue 9,894,900 shares of Bio-Solutions' common stock to the OmniMed Shareholders. These issuances were deemed to be exempt under rule 506 of Regulation D and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended since, among other things, the transaction did not involve a public offering, the investors were accredited investors and/or qualified institutional buyers, the investors had access to information about the company and their investment, the investors took the securities for investment and not resale, and the Company took appropriate measures to restrict the transfer of the securities.

As a result of the Agreement, the OmniMed Shareholders assumed control of Bio-Solutions. Effective November 21, 2005, Bio-Solutions changed its name to OmniMed International, Inc.  Effective January 17, 2006, OmniMed changed its name to MedeFile International, Inc. ("MedeFile" or the "Company").

Overview of Business

MedefileMedeFile International, Inc., through its Medefile,MedeFile, Inc. subsidiary, has developed and globally markets a proprietary, patient-centric, Internet-enabled Personal Health Record (iPHR) system for gathering, digitizing, maintaining, accessing and sharing an individual’s actual medical records. Our goal is to revolutionize the medical industry by bringing patient-centric digital technology to the business of medicine. We intend to accomplish its objective by providing individuals with a simple and secure way to access their lifetime of actual medical records in an efficient and cost-effective manner. Our products and services are designed to provide healthcare providers with the ability to reference their patient's actual past medical records, thereby ensuring the most accurate treatment and services possible while simultaneously reducing redundant procedures.

Interoperable with most electronic medical record systems utilized by physician practices, clinics, hospitals and other care providers, the highly secure, feature-rich MedeFile iPHR solution has been designed to gather all of its members’ actual medical records on behalf of each member, and create a single, comprehensive Electronic Health Record (EHR).  The member can access his/her records 24-hours a day, seven days a week – or authorize a third party user – on any web-enabled device (personal computer ("PC"),(PC, cell phone, PDA, e-reader, et al), as well as the portable MedeFile flash drive/keychain or branded UBS-bracelet.
 
By subscribing to the MedeFile system, not only do members empower themselves to take control of their own health and well-being, they empower their healthcare providers to make sound and lifesaving decisions with the most accurate, up-to-date medical information available.  In addition, with MedeFile, members enjoy the peace of mind that comes from knowing that their medical records are protected from fire, natural disaster, document misplacement or the closing of a medical or dental practice.
 
14
We believe we enjoy a number of direct, competitive advantages over others in the medical records marketplace:
 
●  We have developed products and services geared to the patient, while containing the depth and breadth of information required by treating physicians and medical personnel.
  
●  We do all the work of collecting and updating medical information on an ongoing basis; its dependence on the patient taking action is minimal – particularly when compared to patient action required to support competing solutions.
  
14

●  We provide a complete medical record.  Other companies claim complete longitudinal records, but in reality only provide histories (usually completed by the member/patient), and are by no means complete or necessarily accurate records.
  
●  We provide a coherent mix of services and products that are intended to affect the quality of healthcare by enabling the patient to manage and access the information normally retained by doctors and other care providers.
 
Industry Overview

Since the beginning of modern medicine, information about a patient's history, testing, treatment and care have been key factors in the provision and delivery of quality healthcare. Medical record information takes many forms, such as the patient's diagnosis, treatments, surgeries, medications, allergies, x-rays and test results. The usage of medical record information has dramatically increased over the past two decades due to factors such as the complex reimbursement structure in the United States healthcare system, an ever more litigious society, and increased patient awareness.
Every patient visit generates a medical record. Today, this information is largely contained in a paper-based patient medical record. A patient's medical records are usually stored in physicians' offices as well as other healthcare facilities the patient has visited. A record that tracks a patient's medical treatment over time is called a "longitudinal record".

In today's healthcare environment, access to hospital-based medical records by patients and other authorized parties (e.g., insurance companies, attorneys, etc.) is controlled by Release of Information (ROI) policies and procedures. ROI processes are based on the premise that patients have a right to access their medical records and that they must specifically designate any other party to whom their medical information can be released. ROI policies and procedures are based on the following laws and policies: the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), various state laws, and the policies and professional practice guidelines set forth by the American Health Information Management Association (AHIMA).

Congress passed the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) in 1996. The purpose of HIPAA is to prevent fraud in the healthcare industry and to protect confidential patient information. HIPPA standardizes and provides enforcement mechanisms for ROI rules and guidelines to protect personal healthcare information. HIPAA effects entities involved with electronic health care information--including health care providers, health plans, employers, public health authorities, life insurers, clearinghouses, billing agencies, information systems vendors, service organizations, universities, and even single-physician offices. The final version of the HIPAA Privacy regulations was issued in December 2000, and went into effect on April 14, 2001. A two-year "grace" period was included; enforcement of the HIPAA Privacy Rules began on April 14, 2003.
15
Overview of Products and Services

MedeFile

MedeFile is a Business-to-Business and a Business-to-Consumer subscription service. MedeFile is designed to create a "cradle to grave" longitudinal record for each of its members by retrieving and consolidating copies of their medical records. When the records are received, the MedeFile system consolidates them into a single medically correct format. The records are then stored in Medefile's MedeVault, a secure repository that can be accessed by MedeFile members 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Because of the unique security procedures incorporated into the MedeFile system through SecuroMed, the member is the only person to access or give permission to access their records.

A complete MedeFile file is comprised of copies of the member's medical records, as well as a Digital Health Profile, which is an overview of the patient's and his/her family's medical history. In addition, every MedeFile member receives a MedeDrive, an external USB drive which stores all of a patient's emergency medical information, as well as a copy of the member's MedeFile.

MedeFile's Emergency Medical Information (EMI) Card

Upon becoming a MedeFile member, each individual will receive a Membership / Emergency Medical Information (EMI) Card which contains instructions on how to contact MedeFile in order to retrieve the member's medical records.

The Digital Health Profile (DHP)

A part of a member's MedeFile is their Digital Health Profile ("DHP"). This form is completed by the patient in order to provide a summary of the patient's healthcare history which assists healthcare providers in understanding the patient's course of medical treatment. This document, along with Advanced Directives and medical record copies, complete the documents contained in the patient's MedeFile.

MedeDrive

The MedeDrive is an external USB drive which stores all of a patient's emergency medical information and their MedeFile which can be viewed on a personal computer. MedeDrive self loads its own viewer, so no special program or software is required. The MedeDrive easily plugs into any PC USB port on most Windows-based computers built in the last four years (Macintosh version is currently unavailable). The MedeDrive USB key can be updated easily and as frequently as the member desires at no additional cost.
MedeVault

The MedeVault is designed to serve as an electronic data and document repository that incorporates state-of-the-art security features in order to prevent unauthorized access to a patient's records. Access to the MedeVault is provided through an encrypted connection to a web service run by Medefile. This connection is provided by Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) technology.
Medefile Clinical Information Systems ("Medefile CIS")

Medefile CIS is a Business-to-Business professional consulting service that is designed to generate revenue from two primary sources: consulting engagements and product commissions.

Medefile CIS intends to offer a full range of HIPPA assessment and compliance services. The goal of Medefile CIS is to facilitate the transition to HIPAA compliance. In addition, Medefile CIS intends to offer services that will enable medical facilities to transition from paper-based medical records to electronic medical records. Medefile CIS plans to digitize medical facility offices and offer software to keep the records up-to-date, index the records, and make them queryable based on each facility's specific needs.
Medefile consulting engagements are generally fixed-price and fixed scope projects that also generate occasional time-and-materials income from ongoing support and training activities related to its services. In addition, Medefile CIS intends to resell technology from various vendors as needed and may incur commission revenue and revenue from the markup of these products.

Medefile CIS will offer several services, including the evaluation of the record keeping, security, and back office practices. After evaluation is complete, Medefile CIS staff will move forward to implement their own remediation plans for the client.  Other revenue streams may be created based on the licensing of the OmniViewer for the digitized records as well as the scanning software for those facilities wishing to implement a "go-forward" scanning system. Finally, the clients may be charged a contractual support fee for ongoing technical support and updates, which may be assessed on an annual basis.

MedeMinder

MedeMinder is MedeFile’s reminder service.  The member tells us when and where to call, and we automatically contact the member day or night with an appropriate reminder, spoken by real people. The member can even choose the voice they want to hear.  MedeMinder helps insure the member will not miss an appointment or forget to take their medication.
SecurMed

SecurMed is designed to serve as an authentication process that protects against any information being viewed by unauthorized persons.

Sales and Marketing

We intend to employ the following marketing strategies in order to generate awareness of our products and services: direct sales, direct mail, a public relations campaign, speaking engagements by our executive officers, participation in trade shows, and alliances and partnerships with third parties.

Our marketing strategy will target the following types of organizations: Health Maintenance Organizations, Preferred Provider Organizations, managed care organizations, insurance companies, unions, large groups of individuals such as AARP, large- and medium-sized corporations, nursing homes and Internet users.

In particular, the MedeFile service is designed to be sold in several distinct ways:

●
MedeFile Website - Through normal e-commerce mechanisms, patients may enroll in the service directly from the MedeFile website. Membership may be purchased on an annual basis and may be paid all at once, or over time at the patient's discretion.
16

●
Physician Referrals - Patients may enroll based on a doctor's referral. In the event that these physicians are also Medefile CIS customers, they may easily transfer their patients' information into the MedeFile system.

●
Large group offerings (e.g., AARP, trade unions) - Large, membership-driven organizations may offer the MedeFile system to their members at a discounted rate, which may be negotiated with us based on the size of the expected enrollment. An additional promotional advantage may be derived from the use of MedeFile through the website of the client organization, allowing members to access MedeFile using each organization's site.

●
Insurance companies - Similar to large group offerings identified above, insurance companies may offer the MedeFile service to their insured as a means to decrease the cost of medical care.

Technology

We use and continue to update the most advanced security measures available. Data transmitted between Web browsers and Web servers over the Internet using TCP/IP is generally susceptible to unauthorized interception. To protect sensitive data, the most common method of protection is data encryption. We use the industry standard Secure Sockets Layer (SSL), which is a mechanism to secure Internet traffic so that it cannot be intercepted. SSL utilizes digital certificates to verify the identity and integrity of a web site (such as MedeFile) and to protect the security of transactions by certifying their source and destination. 

Competition

There are other companies working in the medical information technology arena such as GE Healthcare, Bio-Imaging Technologies, and Cyber Records. Some competing companies offer a USB key for medical record storage, but require the customer to provide or "self-populate" the information to be stored. The information in a self-populated record is limited and is only as accurate as the individual's memory and understanding of their health condition. Other companies expect each customer to obtain their own medical records from their various healthcare providers. Some offer a CD-Rom for record storage. Usually, the CD-Rom cannot be updated with any changes to an individual's medical status or treatment. Therefore, a new CD-Rom needs to be obtained from that company in order for the individual to have the most current, accurate information regarding their health. There are companies that are solely web-based that do not provide the customer the capability to have a copy of their records. In this case, an internet connection is required to view stored documents. In addition, there are companies that do not concentrate on digitizing an individual's medical records but on converting medical facilities' records from paper to electronic format.

The advantage to being a MedeFile member is that we gather, consolidate, organize and securely store each member's actual medical records on their behalf. The MedeFile membership includes a Digital Health Profile (DHP) which contains the member's general health history, emergency contacts, doctor contacts, family medical history, allergies, medications, and current conditions. A MedeFile membership also includes a MedeDrive which easily plugs into any PC USB port on most Windows-based computers built in the last four years (Macintosh version is currently not available yet). The MedeDrive contains the member's emergency medical information that can be easily accessed by emergency care personnel, and the client's actual medical records which are stored in a secure area of the subscriber's MedeFile. The MedeDrive USB key can be updated easily and as frequently as the member desires at no additional cost.

Members

As of August 15, 2011, we had approximately 15,179 members. The Company’s marketing strategy includes issuing trial memberships on several levels.

Employees
From our inception through the period ended June 30, 2011, we have primarily relied on the services of outside consultants.  As of June 30, 2011, MedeFile had a total of ­­4 full time employees and 4 consultants.

We believe our relations with our employees are favorable.

Website Development

The Company has completed an extensive redesign of its website.  The site has been rebranded and made ready for search engine optimization (SEO).  During development, the Company used feedback from focus groups to make the site user friendly, intuitive and easy to use.  In addition, improvements have been made to help support direct response campaigns.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

COMPARISON OF THREE-MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30,ENDING MARCH 31, 2012 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDING MARCH 31, 2011 AND JUNE 30, 2010
17

Revenues

Revenues for the quarter ended June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 totaled $187,740$13,714 compared to revenues of $4,242$132,102 during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.   The increasedecrease in membership revenue is primarily related to an increasea decrease in the amount of members and medical record reimbursement revenue received from members. Medical record reimbursement revenue is a dollar for dollar reimbursement for charges from members'member’s doctors for sending updated medical records to MedeFile. The off-setting expense is charged to selling general and administrative expense.  The Company has increaseddecreased its marketing and advertising efforts and asthrough a previously used telemarketing campaign.  As a result, there has been a substantial increasedecrease in memberships over the previous period.  Revenues received from memberships are recognized through the period of the membership, and, therefore, revenue recognized represents a fraction of the membership in the quarter being reported.   

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 totaled $442,085, an increase$239,774, a decrease of $340,950$139,346 or approximately 337%36.8% compared to selling, general and administrative expenses of $101,135$379,120 for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.March 31, 2011. The overall increasedecrease in the total selling, general and administrative is primarily due to increaseddecreased costs associated with attracting new members, salesa previously used telemarketing campaign and business development expenses.
 
Marketing Expense

Marketing expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 totaled $310,867,$0, compared to $0$129,854 for the quarter ending June 30, 2010.March 31, 2012.  The increaseddecrease marketing expense was due to aggressivedecreased use of lead generation for new members.telemarketing efforts.  The Company reliesrelied on one source for generation of leads through the Company’s telemarketing efforts as our only source of generating leads to increase revenues.efforts.

Depreciation Expense
 
Depreciation expense totaled $2,512$2,352 for the quarter ended June 30 2011,March 31, 2012, compared to depreciation expense of $4,196$2,600 during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.March 31, 2012. The decrease in depreciation was due to some assets being fully depreciated.    

Amortization Expense

Amortization expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 totaled $5,245, compared to $5,245 for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.  Amortization expense is the expensing of the website development through May 2013.  Amortization began in the second quarter of 2010 and is expensed at $5,245 per quarter over a three-year period.

Interest Expense
Net interest expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 was $0, a decrease of $1,220,324 as compared to interest expense of $1,220,324 during the quarter ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was due to the Company paying of their debt obligations during the 2nd quarter of 2010

Net Loss

For the reasons stated above, our net loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 was $663,237, or $0 per share, a decrease of $663,421, compared to a net loss of $1,326,658, or $0 per share, during the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
COMPARISON OF SIX-MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2011 AND JUNE 30, 2010

Revenues

Revenues for the six-months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $319,842, compared to revenues of $6,602 during the six-months ended June 30, 2010.    The increase in membership revenue is primarily related to an increase in the amount of members and medical record reimbursement revenue received from members. Medical record reimbursement revenue is a dollar for dollar reimbursement for charges from members' doctors for sending updated medical records to Medefile. The off-setting expense is charged to selling general and administrative expense.  The Company has increased its marketing and advertising efforts, and as a result, there has been a substantial increase in memberships over the previous period.  Revenues received from memberships are expensed through the period of the membership, and, therefore, revenue recognized represents a fraction of the membership in the quarter being reported.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $821,205, an increase of $640,896 or approximately 355%, compared to selling, general and administrative expenses of $180,309 for the six months ended June 30, 2010. The overall increase in the total selling, general and administrative is primarily due to increased costs associated with attracting new members, sales and business development expenses.
18
Marketing Expense

Marketing expense for the six-months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $440,721, compared to $0 for the six-months ending June 30, 2010.  The increased marketing expense was due to aggressive lead generation for new members.  The Company relies on telemarketing efforts as our only source of generating leads to increase revenues.
Depreciation Expense
Depreciation expense totaled $5,114 for the six-months ended June 30 2011, compared to depreciation and amortization expense of $8,446 during the six-months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease in depreciation was due to some assets being fully depreciated.
Amortization Expense

Amortization expense for the six-months ended June 30, 2011 totaled $10,490, compared to $5,245 for the six-months ended June 30, 2010. ��Amortization expense is the expensing of website development through May 2013.  Amortization began in the second quarter of 2010 and is expensed at $5,245 per quarter over a three-year period.

Interest Expense
Net interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $0, a decrease of $1,229,799 as compared to interest expense of $1,229,799 during the six months ended June 30, 2010. The decrease was due to the Company paying off their debt obligations during the 2nd quarter of 2010

Net Loss

For the reasons stated above, our net loss for the six-months ended June 30, 2011 was $1,111,429,$233,723, or $0.00 per share, a decrease of $305,769,$214,470, compared to a net loss of $1,417,198,$448,193, or $0.00 per share, during the six-monthsquarter ended June 30, 2010.March 31, 2011.
15

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2011,March 31, 2012, we had cash and cash equivalents of $311,975,$30,344, inventory of $27,904,$53,859, merchant services reserve of $53,267,$64,320, and accounts receivable of $2,810 and prepaid insurance of $4,494.$1,893.  Net cash used in operating activities for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 was approximately $947,877.$167,829. Current liabilities of $251,100$207,483 consisted of $244,379$200,589 for accounts payable and accrued liabilities and deferred revenues of $6,721.$6,894. We have a net negative working capital of $149,350.$57,067.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared contemplating a continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has reported a net loss of $1,111,429$233,723 for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 and $2,492,310$2,079,374 for the year ended December 31, 20102011 and had an accumulated deficit of $17,273,985$18,475,653 as of June 30, 2011.March 31, 2012.  The Company has a net negative working capital of $149,350$57,067 as of June 30, 2011.March 31, 2012.

The Company currently estimates that it will require approximately $420,000 to continue its operations for the next twelve months.  Additional investments are being sought, but we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain such investments. Financing transactions may include the issuance of equity or debt securities, obtaining credit facilities, or other financing mechanisms. However, the trading price of our common stock and the downturn in the U.S. stock and debt markets could make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to collect significant amounts owed to us, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we will have to curtail our operations

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2011March 31, 2012 or as of the date of this report.
 
ItemITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As a Smaller Reporting Company as defined Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this Item 3.
ItemITEM 4. Controls and Procedures.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act are recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
19

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer); of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act). Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer) concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and which also are effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive and Financial Officer), to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
 
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the most recent quarter ended June 30, 2011,March 31, 2012, there has been no change in our internal control over  financial  reporting  (as defined in Rule  13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) ) that has materially affected,  or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
 

16

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.Proceedings

From time to time, the Company may become involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal course of business. We are not involved in any pending legal proceeding or litigation and, to the best of our knowledge, no governmental authority is contemplating any proceeding to which we are a party or to which any of our properties is subject, which would reasonably be likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.Factors

As a Smaller Reporting Company as defined Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and in item 10(f)(1) of Regulation S-K, we are electing scaled disclosure reporting obligations and therefore are not required to provide the information requested by this Item .
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.Proceeds

On May 6, 2011,March 21, 2012, the Company issued 7,653,06153,571,429 shares of Common Stockcommon stock for amounts due to consultants forinvestor relations services.
On May 12, 2011, In connection with the foregoing, the Company received $603,000 from proceeds from a securities purchase agreement for the purchase of 201,000,000 shares of Common Stock.
On May 13, 2011, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock for amounts due to consultants for services.
On June 3, 2011, the Company received $24,000 from proceeds from a securities purchase agreement for the purchase of 8,000,000 shares of Common Stock. The stock is currently unissued and $24,000 is recorded as a stock payable.

The shares of Common Stock were issued pursuant torelied on the exemption from registration inprovided by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and containfor transactions not involving a restrictive legend.public offering.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Securities

None.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.
Item 5. Other Information.Information

None. 
20
Item 6. Exhibits.
(a) Pursuant to Rule 601 of Regulation S-K, the following exhibits are included herein or incorporated by reference.Exhibits
 
Exhibit No.
31.1
Description
31.1
Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 and Rule 15d-14(a), promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
   
32.1
32.1
Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
EX-101.INSXBRL INSTANCE DOCUMENT
  
101.INS
EX-101.SCH
XBRL Instance Document**
TAXONOMY EXTENSION SCHEMA DOCUMENT
  
101.SCH
EX-101.CAL
XBRL Schema Document**
TAXONOMY EXTENSION CALCULATION LINKBASE
  
101.CAL
EX-101.DEF
Calculation Linkbase Document**
XBRL TAXONOMY EXTENSION DEFINITION LINKBASE
  
101.LAB
EX-101.LAB
XBRL Label Linkbase Document**
TAXONOMY EXTENSION LABELS LINKBASE
  
101.PRE
EX-101.PRE
XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document**
101.DEF
XBRL Definition Linkbase Document**
TAXONOMY EXTENSION PRESENTATION LINKBASE
* Filed herewith.
** Attached as Exhibit 101
17

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to this report are the following financial statements from the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2011 formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language):  (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) related notes to these financial statements tagged as blocks of text.  The XBRL-related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed “filed” or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and is not filed for purposes of Section 18requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liabilities of those sections.

21
SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 
 MEDEFILE INTERNATIONAL, INC. 
    
AugustMay 15, 20112012By:/s/ Kevin Hauser 
  Kevin Hauser 
  President, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal FinancialAccounting Officer) 
    
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
18
22