(A Development Stage Company)

Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity/(Deficiency)

For the six months ended June 30, 2012

(Unaudited)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.statements 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

PowerVerde, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31,June 30, 2012

Note 1 – Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with instructions for Form 10-Q, include all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) which are necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested that these condensed consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the Annual Report of PowerVerde, Inc. (“PowerVerde,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) as of and for the year ended December 31, 2011. The results of operations for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012, are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year or for future periods. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PowerVerde, Inc., formerly known as Vyrex Corporation (the "Company"), and PowerVerde Systems, Inc., formerly known as PowerVerde, Inc., its wholly-owned subsidiary. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Note 2 – Going Concern

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has had recurring operating losses and negative cash flows from operations. Those factors, as well as uncertainty in securing additional funds for continued operations, create an uncertainty about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Note 3 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Development Stage Company

The Company is a development stage company as defined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 915, “Development Stage Entities.” The Company is devoting substantially all of its present efforts to establish a new business and none of its planned principal operations have commenced. All losses accumulated since inception have been considered as part of the Company’s development stage activities.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consist of balances due from sales and royalties. The Company monitors accounts receivable and provides allowances when considered necessary. At March 31,June 30, 2012, accounts receivable were considered to be fully collectible. Accordingly, no allowance for doubtful accounts was provided.

Revenue Recognition

Sales revenues and associated cost of sales are recognized when title of the goods sold pass to the buyer, when shipped and when accounts receivable are determined to be reasonably collectable. Certain sales agreements also require installation and training by PowerVerde once goods are received and accepted by the customer.

Licensing and royalty revenue from royalty agreements is recognized in accordance with the terms of the specific agreement.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Expenditures for major betterments and additions are capitalized, while replacement, maintenance and repairs, which do not extend the lives of the respective assets, are expensed as incurred.

Intellectual Property and Goodwill

The Company reviews intangible assets with finite lives for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. The Company uses an estimate of the undiscounted cash flows over the remaining life of its long-lived assets, or related group of assets where applicable, in measuring whether the assets to be held and used will be realizable. In the event of impairment, the Company would discount the futureutilize a discounted cash flows using its then estimated incremental borrowing rateflow analysis to determine an estimate of the amount of the impairment.

Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The impairment analysis involves a two step process. Step one involves the comparison of the fair value of the reporting unit to which goodwill relates (the Company’s enterprise value) to the carrying value of the reporting unit. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, there is no impairment. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the reporting unit, the Company determines the implied fair value of goodwill and records an impairment charge for any excess of the carrying value of goodwill over its implied fair value.

For those reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts, an entity must evaluate whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, regardless of the mathematical results of the Step 1 test.  In making that determination, the entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors that could impact the amount of goodwill.

Stock-based Compensation

The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718Share-Based Payments. The Company has used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options on the date of grant.

Common Stock Purchase Warrants

The Company accounts for common stock purchase warrants in accordance with ASC Topic 815- 40, Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (“ASC 815-40”). Based on the provisions of ASC 815- 40, the Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement, or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company), or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).

Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes

The Company applies the accounting standard regarding “Accounting for Uncertain Tax Positions” which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements, and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement process for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The standard also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

Based on our evaluation, we have concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions requiring recognition in our consolidated financial statements. Our evaluation was performed for the tax years ended December 31, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011, the tax years which remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions as of March 31,June 30, 2012.

We may from time to time be assessed interest or penalties by major tax jurisdictions, although any such assessments historically have been minimal and immaterial to our financial results. In the event we have received an assessment for interest and/or penalties, it has been classified in the consolidated financial statements as selling, general and administrative expense.

Research and Development Costs

The Company’s research and development costs are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Financial Instruments and Fair Values

The fair value of a financial instrument represents the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties, other than in a forced or liquidation sale. Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based upon relevant market information about the financial instrument.

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and other assets approximates fair value due to the short-term maturities of these instruments.

The fair values of all other financial instruments, including debt, approximate their book values as the instruments are short-term in nature or contain market rates of interest.

Reclassifications

Certain reclassifications have been made to conform prior period’s presentation to the current period’s presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.

Note 4 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2011-11 “Disclosures about offsetting Assets and Liabilities” requiring additional disclosure about offsetting and related arrangements. ASU 2011-11 is effective retrospectively for periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2011-11 will not have a material impact on the Company’s future financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02-Testing Indefinite- Lived Intangible Assets Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”) in order to reduce the cost and complexity of performing an impairment test for indefinite-lived intangible assets by simplifying how an entity tests those assets for impairment and to improve consistency in impairment testing guidance. The new guidance allows an entity the option to make a qualitative assessment about the likelihood that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired to determine whether it should perform a quantitative impairment test. ASU 2012-02 becomes effective for the Company on October 1, 2012, and earlier adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of the guidance to have a material impact on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

Note 5 – Acquisition

On March 30, 2012, the Company purchased 100% of the membership interests of Cornerstone Conservation Group LLC (“Cornerstone”) pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the “Agreement”). Cornerstone’s main asset is its proprietary Combined Cooling, Heating and Power (“CCHP”) technology, which utilizes waste heat from commercial and residential heating, ventilation air conditioning and refrigeration (“HVACR”) systems. Cornerstone also has substantial experience and technology relating to geothermal or ground source heat pumps. The Company also moved its operations to a 5,000 square foot facility owned by one of the sellers in Scottsdale Arizona. The Company has been using the facility rent-freerent free on a short-termshort term basis but expects to negotiate a lease on fair market terms.

In consideration for the 100% membership interests in Cornerstone, the Company issued 2,260,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (valued at $1.37 per share, the closing price on March 30, 2012) to the selling members of Cornerstone and issued to the sellers fully vested three–year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock as follows:

The estimated fair value of the total warrants issued in connection with the acquisition of Cornerstone was $201,000 which was calculated using the Black-Scholes option valuation method with the following assumptions: a risk free interest rate of 1.04 percent, an estimated volatility of 79.1 percent and no dividend yield.  The total present value of all consideration expected to be paid as part of this agreement was $3,297,200.

The following summarizes the fair values of the assets acquired:

The assets acquired were recorded at preliminary estimates of fair values determined by management, based on information currently available and on current assumptions as to future operations, and are subject to change upon the completion of acquisition accounting, including the finalization of asset valuations.

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, amortization expense and accumulated amortization of the intangible asset- intellectual property was $54,953.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of the Company and Cornerstone as if the acquisition had occurred as of January 1, 2012. The pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of what the financial position or results of operations actually would have been had the acquisition been completed as of January 1, 2012. In addition, the unaudited pro forma financial information is not indicative of, nor does it purport to project, the future financial position or operating results of PowerVerde. The unaudited pro forma financial information excludes acquisition and integration costs and does not give effect to any estimated and potential cost savings or other operating efficiencies that could result from the acquisition.

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS INFORMATION

Note 6 – Property and Equipment

A summary of property and equipment at March 31,June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 is as follows:

The amounts charged to operations for depreciation for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $1,913$3,515 and $1,680,$3,743, respectively. Depreciation expense from inception through March 31,June 30, 2012 was $22,434.$24,036.

Note 7 – Stockholders’ Equity

Warrants

In 2008, the Company issued warrants to purchase 250,000 and 50,000 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock at exercise prices of $1.50 and $2.30 per share, respectively. The warrants expired on various dates through November 2011. At March 31,June 30, 2012, 218,500 of these warrants had expired and 81,500 were exercised.

During March through December 2010, the Company issued warrants to purchase 439,999 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share in association with stock subscription agreements. These warrants expire on various dates through December 2013. As of March 31,June 30, 2012, noneall of these warrants were exercised or had expired.outstanding.

During January through December 2011, the Company issued warrants to purchase 2,000,000 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share in association with stock subscription agreements. These warrants expire on various dates through June 2014. As of March 31,June 30, 2012, noneall of these warrants were exercised or had expired.outstanding.

The Company issued warrants on June 3, 2011 to various persons, including affiliates of the Company, for services provided to the Company. These warrants covered the purchase of 1,855,000 unregistered shares of the Company’s stock at an exercise price of $1.05 per share with a five-year term. These share-based payments have been accounted for in accordance with ASC 815-40 using the Black Scholes warrant pricing model to determine the fair value of each warrant. As of June 30, 2012, all of these warrants were outstanding.

On February 3, 2012, The Company issued warrants to purchase 500,000 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $1.00$3.00 per share with a five-year term for settlement of certain disputed amounts (See Note 9). These share-based payments have been accounted for in accordance with ASC 815-40 using the Black-Scholes warrant pricing model to determine the fair value of each warrant. As of June 30, 2012, all of these warrants were outstanding.

In connection with the acquisition of Cornerstone (See Note 5), on March 30, 2012, the Company issued warrants to purchase 300,000 unregistered shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $2.00 to $4.00 per share. These warrants expire at various dates through December 2017. As of June 30, 2012, all of these warrants were outstanding.

During the second quarter of 2012, the Company issued warrants to purchase 335,000 unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $3.00 per share in association with stock subscription agreements. These warrants expire on various dates through June 2015. As of June 30, 2012, all of these warrants were outstanding.

Expenses related to warrants issued in conjunction with settlement of certain disputes for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011 were $262,700 and $0, respectively.

A summary of warrants issued, exercised and expired during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 is as follows:

The weighted average grant date fair value of warrants issued during the threesix month period ended March 31,June 30, 2012 amounted to $0.52 to $0.77 per warrant. The fair value of each warrant granted as compensation for services was determined using the Black-Scholes warrant pricing model and the following assumptions:

The expected term of warrants granted is based on the contractual terms of the agreement and represents the period of time that warrants granted are expected to be outstanding.

The warrant shares referred to above are unregistered shares of the Company’s stock and are restricted from trading as defined under Rule 144 of the United States Securities Act of 1933.

Private Placement of Common Stock

In February 2012, the Company raised gross proceeds of $500,000 through the private placement of 500,000 shares of its common stock to accredited investors at $1.00 per share. The private placement was undertaken pursuant to the Agreement between the Company and Newton as disclosed in Note 9, below.

In the second quarter of 2012, the Company raised gross proceeds of $335,000 through the private placement of 335,000 unregistered shares of common stock to accredited investors at $1.00 per share. Each investor received a three-year warrant to purchase shares of common stock at $3.00 per share for a number of shares equal to the number of shares purchased by the investor in this offering. The Company paid a 10% commission on the gross proceeds of this offering to its placement agent.

Treasury Shares

On April 7, 2011, 4,500,000 shares of the Company’s stock were surrendered to Treasury in exchange for a $200,000 interest-free note payable due in April 2013. The note payable is reported as note payable to related party on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. In accordance with GAAP, the Company has discounted this obligation at an imputed rate of 8%. The balance at March 31,June 30, 2012 was $184,632.$188,349.

In April 2012, the Company purchased 100,000 shares of common stock from an affiliate at a price of $.25 per share. Of the $25,000 purchase price, $14,000 was paid in 2011 and the balance in April 2012. The shares have been held as treasury stock from the date of closing.

In May 2012, the Company purchased 450,000 shares of its common stock from an affiliate at a price of $0.20 per share. Of the $90,000 purchase price, $10,000 was paid at closing and the balance is payable $10,000 per month through January 2013. The payable has a balance of $70,000 at June 30, 2012 and is included in “Payable to related parties” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. The shares have been held as treasury stock from the date of closing.

Preferred Shares

The Company has 50,000,000 shares of authorized, $0.0001 par value preferred stock. At March 31,June 30, 2012, no shares had been issued.

Note 8 – Stock Options

Stock option activity for the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2012, is summarized as follows:

Total stock option compensation for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $131,454 for each of the periods.$233,454 and $284,454 respectively. Remaining stock option compensation of $335,454$233,454 will be recognized through the remainder of 2012.

Note 9 –9– Commitments and Contingencies

On September 29, 2011, the Company entered into a license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Newton.Newton Investments BV. Pursuant to the License Agreement, Newton will, for a period of 10 years, hold the exclusive manufacturing and distribution rights for the Systems in the 27 countries which are currently members of the European Union, subject to Newton’s achieving minimum sales of at least 100 Systems per year beginning in the second year of the License Agreement, payment of a royalty equal to 20% of the gross sales price of each System sold, and other terms and conditions set forth in the License Agreement.

In the first quarter of 2012, the Company raised $500,000 exclusively from accredited European investors (including

$275,000 $275,000 from a Newton affiliate) pursuant to a private placement of 500,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.00 per share. There was no warrant issued pursuant to this round; however, simultaneously Newton affiliates received three-year warrants to purchase 500,000 shares at $1.00 per share in connectionconnections with the settlement of certain claims by and between the Company and Newton.

Note 10- Related Party Transactions

During the six month periods ended June 30, 2012, and 2011, the Company received services for primarily research and development from an affiliate in the amount of $138,382 and $95,219, respectively. As of June 30, 2012, and December 31, 2011, the Company owed $131, 805 and $31,174, respectively to this affiliate.

Note 10.11- Subsequent Events.

In April 2012, the Company purchased 100,000 shares of common stock from a company owned by its Director and cofounder Fred Barker at a price of $.25 per share. Of the $25,000 purchase price, $14,000 was paid in 2011 and the balance in April 2012. The shares will be held as treasury stock from the date of closing.

In May 2012, the Company purchased 450,000 shares of its common stock from Mr. Barker at a price of $0.20 per share. Of the $90,000 purchase price, $10,000 was paid at closing and the balance is payable $10,000 per month through January 2013. The shares will be held as treasury stock from the date of closing.

In the secondthird quarter of 2012, the Company raised gross proceeds of $335,000$71,000 through the private placement of 335,00071,000 unregistered shares of common stock to accredited investors at $1.00 per share. Each investor received a three-year warrant to purchase shares of common stock at $3.00 per share for a number of shares equal to the number of shares purchased by the investor in this offering. The Company paid a 10% commission on the gross proceeds of this offering to its placement agent.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward Looking Statements

Readers are cautioned that the statements in this Report that are not descriptions of historical facts may be forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. This Report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Such forward-looking statements are based on the beliefs of our management, as well as on assumptions made by and information currently available to us as of the date of this Report. When used in this Report, the words “plan,” “will,” “may,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. Although we believe these statements are reasonable, actual actions, operations and results could differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements as a result of the risk factors included in our 2011 Annual Report, or other factors. We must caution, however, that this list of factors may not be exhaustive and that these or other factors, many of which are outside of our control, could have a material adverse effect on us and our ability to achieve our objectives. All forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements set forth above.

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere herein.

Critical Accounting Policies

The condensed consolidated financial statements of PowerVerde, Inc. are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that effect the amounts reported in the financial statements and related notes. Future events and their effects cannot be determined with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect its more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Sales revenues and associated cost of sales are recognized when title of the goods sold pass to the buyer, when shipped, and when accounts receivable are determined to be reasonably collectable. Certain sales agreements also require installation and training by PowerVerde once goods are received and accepted by the customer. The Company does not consider these agreements multiple elements arrangements as defined by ASC 605-25Revenue Recognition , as the Company does not offer installation or training as services separate from the sale of its products, at this time, and therefore a “best estimate of selling price” or individual pricing in accordance with ASC 605-25 is undeterminable. The Company defers all revenues and costs of sales until the agreement is 100% complete.

Licensing and royalty revenue from royalty agreements is recognized in accordance with the terms of the specific agreement.

Stock-based Compensation

We account for share-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718Share-Based Payments. We have used the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the fair value of stock options on the date of grant.

Common Stock Purchase Warrants

The Company accounts for common stock purchase warrants in accordance with ASC Topic 815-40,Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (“ASC 815-40”). Based on the provisions of ASC 815-40, the Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement, or (ii) gives the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company), or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).

Overview

From January 1991 until October 2005, the Company devoted substantially all of its efforts and resources to research and development related to its unsuccessful Biotech Business, in particular the study of biological oxidation and antioxidation directed to the development of potential therapeutic products for the treatment of various diseases and conditions. In the most recent years, the Company’s research focused mainly on targeted antioxidant therapeutics and nutraceuticals. The Company is a development stage company, has generated only limited revenue from product sales and has relied primarily on equity financing, licensing revenues, and various debt instruments for its working capital. The Company has been unprofitable since its inception.

Following the cessation of material Biotech Business operations in October 2005, the Company turned its primary focus to seeking an appropriate merger partner for its public shell. This resulted in the February 2008 merger with Vyrex (the “Merger”). In March 2009, we assigned our Biotech IP to an investor in exchange for his agreement to pay all future expenses relating to the Biotech IP and to pay us 20% of any net proceeds received from sale and/or licensing of the Biotech IP. We do not expect this arrangement to generate material revenues.

Since the Merger, we have focused on the development, testing and commercialization of our electric power systems, in particular, their applicability to thermal and natural gas pipeline operations. Our business is subject to significant risks, including the risks inherent in our research and development efforts, uncertainties associated with obtaining and enforcing patents and intense competition.

Except as specifically noted to the contrary, the following discussion relates only to PowerVerde since, as a result of the Merger, the only historical financial statements presented for the Company in periods following the Merger are those of the operating entity, PowerVerde.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2012, as Compared to Three Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2011

Since inception, we have focused on the development, testing and commercialization of our clean energy electric power generation systems. We had no material revenues in the second quarter of 2012 and 2011. In the 2012 second quarter, our revenues of $29,922 came solely from Biotech IP licensing fees. In the 2011 second quarter, our revenues of $20,553 consisted of Biotech IP licensing fees of $13,332 and $7,221 in revenues from our current business. In both years, we had substantial expenses due to our ongoing research and development activities and efforts to commercialize our systems, as well as substantial administrative expenses associated with our status as a public company. Our research and development expenses decreased by $63,478 (17.7%) in the second quarter of 2012 as compared to 2011, and our general and administrative expenses decreased by $631,070 (69.9%) in the same period. Our higher expenses in the second quarter of 2011 were due to the cost of establishing and developing our relationship with our European distributor, Newton Investments B.V. (“Newton”) and our intensive research and development activities in that period, which more than offset our increased expenses in the second quarter of 2012 arising from our hiring of key personnel from Cornerstone Conservation Group LLC (“Cornerstone”), whose complementary intellectual property we acquired in the first quarter of 2012. Our net loss was $540,479 in the second quarter of 2012, a 56.8% decrease from the net loss of $1,250,761 in the second quarter of 2011. The substantial decrease in our net loss in the second quarter of 2012 was due to our unusually high expenses in the comparable 2011 period and our vigorous cost control efforts. Substantial net losses will continue until we are able to successfully commercialize and market our systems, as to which there can be no assurance. 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2012, as Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2011

Since inception, we have focused on the development, testing and commercialization of our clean energy electric power generation systems. We had no material revenues in the first quartersix months of 2012 and 2011. In the first six months of 2012, our revenues of $44,357 came solely from Biotech IP licensing fees. In the first six months of 2011, — just $14,435 and $10,438 inour revenues of $30,991 consisted of Biotech IP licensing fees respectively.of $23,770 and $7,221 in revenues from our current business. In both years, we had substantial expenses due to our ongoing research and development activities and efforts to commercialize our systems, as well as substantial administrative expenses associated with our status as a public company. Our research and development expenses increased by $114,249 (57.1%$313,472 (56.1%) in the first quartersix months of 2012 as compared to 2011, and our general and administrative expenses increaseddecreased by $255,420 (111.8%$638,350 (56.4%). These increases were in the same period. The increase in research and development expenses was due primarily to our substantially increased scaleacquisition of operations to develop, test and commercialize our systems and our efforts to further develop our relationship with our European distributor, Newton Investments B.V. (“Newton”). We incurred substantially increased expenses in 2012 for employee/consultant compensation, including the value of stock-based compensation vested and warrants issued, as well as for travel expenses. These increased expenses were due in large part to the addition to our team of key personnel from Cornerstone Conservation Group LLC (“Cornerstone”), whose complementary intellectual property we acquired in the first quarter of 2012. Our net lossThe increase in research and development was $787,484also due to the warrants issued in the first quarter of 2012 to settle certain disputed amounts with Newton with an estimated fair value of $262,700. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was due to our extraordinary expenses in the second quarter of 2011 in connection with the establishment and development of our relationship with Newton, which more than offset our increased compensation expenses in the second quarter of 2012 arising from our hiring of key Cornerstone personnel. Our net loss was $1,327,963 in the first six months of 2012, a 99.6% increase over19.3% decrease from the net loss of $394,510$1,645,271 in the first quartersix months of 2011. The substantial increasedecrease in our net loss in the first six months of 2012 was due to our unusually high expenses in the comparable 2011 period and our vigorous efforts to develop and commercialize our technology and products and implement our business plan, which included the Cornerstone acquisition.cost control efforts. Substantial net losses will continue until we are able to successfully commercialize and market our products,systems, as to which there can be no assurance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have financed our operations since inception through the sale of debt and equity securities. As of March 31,June 30, 2012, we had a working capital deficit of $66,370$446,427 compared to a working capital deficit of $128,598 at December 31, 2011.

During the first quarter of 2012, we raised gross proceeds of $500,000 through the private placement of 500,000 unregistered shares of our common stock to accredited investors at $1.00 per share. We paid a 10% commission on the gross proceeds of this offering to our placement agent, Martinez-Ayme Securities.

In the second quarter of 2012, we raised gross proceeds of $335,000 through the private placement of 335,000 unregistered shares of our common stock to accredited investors at $1.00 per share. Each investor received a three-year warrant to purchase shares of our common stock at $3.00 per share for a number of shares equal to the number of shares purchased by the investor in this offering. We paid a 10% commission on the gross proceeds of this offering to our placement agent, Martinez-Ayme Securities.

In the third quarter of 2012, we raised gross proceeds of $71,000 through the private placement of 71,000 unregistered shares of common stock to accredited investors at $1.00 per share. Each investor received a three-year warrant to purchase shares of common stock at $3.00 per share for a number of shares equal to the number of shares purchased by the investor in this offering. We paid a 10% commission on the gross proceeds of this offering to its placement agent.

We believe that our current level of working capital will be sufficient to sustain our current operations through at least approximately the next two months. However, we continue to seek more funding from private equity investors, as we will need to raise substantial additional capital in order to finance our plan of operations. There can be no assurance that we will be able to raise the necessary funds. If we do not raise the necessary funds, we will be forced to cease operations.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Not applicable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including the Chief Executive Officer and President, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Report. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no significant changes in internal control over financial reporting during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2012 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the 2011 Annual Report. Please refer to that section for disclosure regarding the risks and uncertainties related to our business.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

In the first quarter of 2012, we raised $500,000 exclusively from accredited European investors (including $275,000 from a Newton affiliate) pursuant to a private placement of $500,000 shares of common stock at a price of $1.00 per share. There was no warrant issued pursuant to this round; however, simultaneously Newton affiliates received three-year warrants to purchase 500,000 shares at $1.00 per share in connection with the settlement of certain claims by and between the Company and Newton.

In the second quarter of 2012, we raised gross proceeds of $335,000 through the private placement of 335,000 unregistered shares of our common stock to accredited investors at $1.00 per share. Each investor received a three-year warrant to purchase shares of our common stock at $3.00 per share for a number of shares equal to the number of shares purchased by the investor in this offering. We paid a 10% commission on the gross proceeds of this offering to our placement agent, Martinez-Ayme Securities.

In Marchthe third quarter of 2012, in connection with our acquisitionwe raised gross proceeds of 100%$71,000 through the private placement of the membership interests of Cornerstone Conservation Group LLC, we issued 2,260,00071,000 unregistered shares of common stock and fully vestedto accredited investors at $1.00 per share. Each investor received a three-year warrantswarrant to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock at prices ranging from $2.00-$4.00$3.00 per share. See Note 5share for a number of Notesshares equal to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.the number of shares purchased by the investor in this offering. The Company paid a 10% commission on the gross proceeds of this offering to its placement agent.

The foregoing issuances were made pursuant to the private offering exemption from registration provided in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. All proceeds of these sales were used for working capital.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

In April 2012, we purchased 100,000 shares of our common stock from a company owned by our Director and cofounder Fred Barker at a price of $.25 per share. Of the $25,000 purchase price, $14,000 was paid in 2011 and the balance in April 2012. The shares will behave been held as treasury stock from the date of closing.

In May 2012, we purchased 450,000 shares of our common stock from Mr. Barker at a price of $0.20 per share. Of the $90,000 purchase price, $10,000 was paid at closing and the balance is payable $10,000 per month through January 2013. The balance owed at June 30, 2012 is $70,000. The shares will behave been held as treasury stock from the date of closing.

Item 6. Exhibits.

(a) Exhibits

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Exhibit Index