UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017



o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Transition Period From to

Commission File Number 001-13533

NOVATION COMPANIES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



Maryland (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		74-2830661 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



~~2114 Central Street,~~500 Grand Boulevard, Suite ~~600,~~201B, Kansas City, MO (Address of Principal Executive Office)		64108 (Zip Code)

Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (816) 237-7000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x oNo ox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes xo No ox

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated ~~filer”~~filer,” “smaller reporting company” and ~~“smaller reporting~~“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x Emerging growth company o



~~Large accelerated filer~~	~~Accelerated filer~~	~~Non-accelerated filer~~	~~Smaller reporting company~~
o	o	o	x

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

The number of shares of the Registrant's Common Stock outstanding on November ~~9, 2016~~16, 2017 was ~~92,844,907.~~95,590,178.

NOVATION COMPANIES, INC.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS



PART I	Financial Information

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	2
	~~Condensed Consolidated Statements of~~ and Comprehensive Income (Loss)	32
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Deficit	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	65

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2117

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2621

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	2621

PART II	Other Information	2722

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	2722

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	2823

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3023

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3023

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	3023

Item 5.	Other Information	3023

Item 6.	Exhibits	3124

	Signatures	3225

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

NOVATION COMPANIES, INC.

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


							As of
	September 30, 2016 (unaudited)			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2017 (unaudited)			December 31, 2016
Assets
Current Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,917		$	2,826		$	6,175		$	4,805
Marketable securities, current	17,388			17,500			9,175			9,943
Other current assets	809			1,119			373			644
Current assets of discontinued operations	448			1,843			424			447
Total current assets	33,562			23,288			16,147			15,839
Non-current Assets
Marketable securities, non-current	802			1,397			25,805			26,545
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation	142			358
Other assets	314			481			225			246
Non-current assets of discontinued operations	—			6,415
Total non-current assets	1,258			8,651			26,030			26,791
Total assets	$	34,820		$	31,939		$	42,177		$	42,630
Liabilities and Shareholders' Deficit
Liabilities
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	573		$	1,453
Current liabilities of discontinued operations	—			2,470
Total current liabilities	573			3,923
Current liabilities - accounts payable and accrued expenses							$	1,135		$	792
Non-current liabilities							72			71
Senior notes	—			88,385
Other liabilities	75			391
Non-current liabilities of discontinued operations	—			1,833
Total non-current liabilities	75			90,609
Total liabilities not subject to compromise	648			94,532			1,207			863
Liabilities subject to compromise	91,394			—			91,971			90,966
Total liabilities	92,042			94,532			93,178			91,829

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders' deficit:
Capital stock, $0.01 par value per share, 120,000,000 shares authorized:
Common stock, 92,844,907 and 92,748,753 shares issued and outstanding as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively	928			928
Common stock, 92,844,907 and 92,748,753 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively							928			928
Additional paid-in capital	744,863			744,575			744,882			744,873
Accumulated deficit	(808,657		)	(809,532		)	(805,426		)	(804,319		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income	5,644			1,436			8,615			9,319
Total shareholders' deficit	(57,222		)	(62,593		)	(51,001		)	(49,199		)
Total liabilities and shareholders' deficit	$	34,820		$	31,939		$	42,177		$	42,630

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOVATION COMPANIES, INC.

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(unaudited; in thousands, except share and per share amounts)


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Three Months Ended September 30,						For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016
Income and Revenues:
Income and revenues:
Interest income – mortgage securities	$	3,635		$	4,585		$	1,435		$	1,379		$	991		$	1,060
Total	3,635			4,585			1,435			1,379			991			1,060

General and administrative expenses	3,563			4,627			708			1,450			1,037			1,808
Total	3,563			4,627			708			1,450			1,037			1,808

Other income (loss)	1,449			(31		)	539			32
Other income													143			303
Reorganization items, net	1,326			—			1,326			—			(1,210		)	—
Interest expense	(1,914		)	(2,414		)	(181		)	(773		)	(1,007		)	(876		)

Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes	933			(2,487		)	2,411			(812		)
Income tax (benefit) expense, continuing operations	(19		)	2			(34		)	(105		)
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	952			(2,489		)	2,445			(707		)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	(77		)	(18,388		)	—			(6,532		)
Net income (loss)	$	875		$	(20,877	)	$	2,445		$	(7,239	)
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes													(2,120		)	(1,321		)
Income tax expense, continuing operations													7			5
Loss from continuing operations													(2,127		)	(1,326		)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes													1,020			(65		)
Net loss													(1,107		)	(1,391		)

Earnings (Loss) Per Share attributable to Novation:
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains realized upon the sale of securities													—			—
Change in unrealized gain on marketable securities – available-for-sale													(704		)	2,225
Total other comprehensive income (loss)													(704		)	2,225
Total comprehensive income (loss)													$	(1,811	)	$	834

Loss per share:
Basic	$	0.01		$	(0.23	)	$	0.03		$	(0.08	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)
Diluted	$	0.01		$	(0.23	)	$	0.03		$	(0.08	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)
Weighted average basic shares outstanding	91,345,504			91,103,880			92,180,484			91,187,345			92,780,250			91,758,041
Weighted average diluted shares outstanding	92,185,518			91,103,880			92,465,111			91,187,345			92,780,250			91,758,041

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOVATION COMPANIES, INC.

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)~~

~~(unaudited; in thousands)~~

For the Nine Months Ended
September 30, For the Three Months Ended
September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Net income (loss) $ 875
$ (20,877 ) $ 2,445
$ (7,239 )

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized gains realized upon the sale of securities (100 ) —
—
—
Change in unrealized gain on marketable securities – available-for-sale 4,308
(739 ) 1,084
(57 )
Total other comprehensive income (loss) 4,208
(739 ) 1,084
(57 )
Total comprehensive income (loss) $ 5,083
$ (21,616 ) $ 3,529

$ (7,296 )

~~See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

~~NOVATION COMPANIES, INC.~~DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

(unaudited; in thousands)

Common
Stock

Additional
Paid-in
Capital

Accumulated
Deficit

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income

Total
Shareholders’
Deficit
Balance, December 31, 2015 $ 928
$ 744,575
$ (809,532 ) $ 1,436
$ (62,593 )
Compensation recognized under stock compensation plans —
288
—
—
288
Net income —
—
875
—
875
Other comprehensive income —
—
—
4,208
4,208
Balance, September 30, 2016 $ 928
$ 744,863
$ (808,657 ) $ 5,644
$ (57,222 )



	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income			Total Shareholders’ Deficit
Balance, December 31, 2016	$	928	$	744,873	$	(804,319	)	$	9,319		$	(49,199	)
Compensation recognized under stock compensation plans	—		9		—			—			9
Net loss	—		—		(1,107		)	—			(1,107		)
Other comprehensive loss	—		—		—			(704		)	(704		)
Balance, March 31, 2017	$	928	$	744,882	$	(805,426	)	$	8,615		$	(51,001	)

Balance, December 31, 2014 $ 915
$ 743,919
$ (780,803 ) $ 2,619
$ (33,350 )
Compensation recognized under stock compensation plans —
479
—
—
479
Issuance of nonvested shares, 1,269,234 shares 13
(13 ) —
—
—
Net loss —
—
(20,877 ) —
(20,877 )
Other comprehensive loss —
—
—
(739 ) (739 )
Balance, September 30, 2015 $ 928
$ 744,385
$ (801,680 ) $ 1,880
$ (54,487 )

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.



Balance, December 31, 2015	$	928	$	744,575	$	(809,532	)	$	1,436	$	(62,593	)
Compensation recognized under stock compensation plans	—		141		—			—		141
Net loss	—		—		(1,391		)	—		(1,391		)
Other comprehensive income	—		—		—			2,225		2,225
Balance, March 31, 2016	$	928	$	744,716	$	(810,923	)	$	3,661	$	(61,618	)

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOVATION COMPANIES, INC.

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited; in thousands)



	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,107	)	$	(1,391	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	1,020			(65		)
Net loss from continuing operations	(2,127		)	(1,326		)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) operating activities:
Amortization of marketable securities, net	39			(76		)
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and senior debt premium	—			(18		)
Loss on disposal of fixed assets	—			2
Realized loss on sale of marketable securities	—			(4		)
Compensation recognized under stock compensation plans	9			116
Changes in:
Due from discontinued operations	1			(19		)
Other current assets and liabilities, net	271			(227		)
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities, net	22			5
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	1,370			119
Net cash used in operating activities of continuing operations	(415		)	(1,428		)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of discontinued operations	998			(1,653		)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	583			(3,081		)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities	765			9,334
Proceeds from paydowns of notes receivable	—			3
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary, net	—			7,642
Purchases of marketable securities	—			(12,672		)
Proceeds from restricted cash	—			368
Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations	765			4,675
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations	—			(159		)
Net cash provided by investing activities	765			4,516

Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash payments for contributions of capital to discontinued operations	—			(205		)
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations	—			(205		)
Net cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations	—			205
Net cash used in financing activities	—			—

Cash and cash equivalents, including discontinued operations:
Net increase	1,348			1,435
Beginning of period	5,000			3,178
End of period	$	6,348		$	4,613



Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for reorganization items	$	(1,244	)	$	—
Cash received (paid for) from income taxes, net	$	—		$	5
Cash received on mortgage securities - available-for-sale with no cost basis	$	904		$	962
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

For the Nine Months Ended
September 30,
2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ 875
$ (20,877 )
Net loss from discontinued operations (77 ) (18,388 )
Net income (loss) from continuing operations 952
(2,489 )

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) operating activities:
Amortization of marketable securities, net 25
244
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs and senior debt premium (2,399 ) 1,861
Adjustment to deferred debt issuance costs and senior debt premium (48 ) —
Deferred taxes —
(2 )
Provision for bad debt, net —
110
Loss on disposal and impairments of fixed assets 111
—
Realized gain on sale of marketable securities (100 ) —
Compensation recognized under stock compensation plans 264
479
Depreciation and amortization expense 86
113
Changes in:
Due from discontinued operations (30 ) (1,544 )
Other current assets and liabilities, net 260
(774 )
Other noncurrent assets and liabilities, net (201 ) (66 )
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 2,052
(920 )
Net cash from (used in) operating activities of continuing operations 972
(2,988 )
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations (1,919 ) (15,283 )
Net cash used in operating activities (947 ) (18,271 )

Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities 17,697
21,994
Proceeds from paydowns of notes receivable 21
—
Proceeds from sale of subsidiary, net 7,643
—
Purchases of marketable securities (12,707 ) —
Proceeds from restricted cash 368
—
Proceeds from sales of property and equipment 19
—
Purchases of property and equipment —
(4 )
Net cash provided by investing activities of continuing operations 13,041
21,990
Net cash used in investing activities of discontinued operations (159 ) (4,283 )
Net cash provided by investing activities 12,882
17,707

Cash flows from financing activities:
Cash payments for contributions of capital to discontinued operations (205 ) (18,080 )
Net cash used in financing activities of continuing operations (205 ) (18,080 )
Net cash provided by financing activities of discontinued operations 205
17,891
Net cash used in financing activities —
(189 )

Cash and cash equivalents, including discontinued operations:
Net increase (decrease) 11,935
(753 )
Beginning of period 3,178
5,654
End of period $ 15,113
$ 4,901

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid for reorganization items $ 426
$ —
Cash paid for interest —
663
Cash income taxes paid (received), net (12 ) 753

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOVATION COMPANIES, INC.

DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

As of and for the period ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 (Unaudited)

Note 1. Financial Statement Presentation

Description of Operations – Novation Companies, Inc. (the ~~“Company” or “Novation” or~~“Company,” “Novation,” “we” or “us”) ~~is in the process of~~has been implementing its strategy to acquire operating businesses or making other investments that generate taxable earnings. AsSee Note 2 for a description of the ~~date~~Company's bankruptcy reorganization and see Note 10 for a description of ~~these condensed consolidated financial statements,~~ the ~~Company has not yet identified any specific acquisition targets.~~Healthcare Staffing, Inc. ("HCS") Acquisition (as defined in Note 2) and the Note Refinancing (as defined in Note 2), which were completed after March 31, 2017.

Prior to 2016, Novation owned 100% of Corvisa LLC ("Corvisa"). On December 21, 2015, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (the ~~"Purchase~~"Corvisa Purchase Agreement") with Corvisa Services LLC ("Corvisa Services"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, and ShoreTel, Inc. ("ShoreTel"). Subject to the terms and conditions under the Corvisa Purchase Agreement, ShoreTel agreed to purchase all of the membership interests of ~~Corvisa. This transaction~~Corvisa (the "Corvisa Sale"). The Corvisa Sale closed on January 6, 2016. The operations of Corvisa have been classified as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Prior to 2015, the Company disposed of its ownership interests in StreetLinks LLC ("StreetLinks"), a national residential appraisal and mortgage real estate valuation management services company. Also prior to 2015, the Company sold a portion of the assets and conducted an orderly wind-down of Advent Financial Services LLC ("Advent"), a financial settlement services provider for professional tax preparers nationwide. See ~~Note 4~~ ~~to the condensed consolidated financial statements for additional information regarding the Company's divestiture activity.~~

Prior to 2008, the Company originated, purchased, securitized, sold, invested in and serviced residential nonconforming mortgage loans and mortgage securities. As a result of those activities, the Company holds mortgage securities that continue to be a source of its earnings and cash flow. See Note 54 and Note 97 ~~to the condensed consolidated financial statements~~ for additional information regarding these securities and the valuation thereof. Also as a result of those activities, the Company may, from time to time, receive indemnification and loan repurchase demands related to past sales of loans to securitization trusts and other third parties. See Note 86 ~~to the condensed consolidated financial statements~~ for additional information regarding these demands.

Liquidity and Going Concern – As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the Company had approximately ~~$14.9~~$6.2 million in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million of restricted cash, portions of which are included in the other current assets and other assets line items on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. In addition, the Company held approximately ~~$18.2~~$35.0 million in marketable securities, which consist of ~~$0.8~~$25.8 million in ~~corporate notes and bonds with a weighted average remaining maturity of 19 months as of September 30, 2016, $15.9~~agency mortgage-backed securities, $0.2 million of equity securities and ~~$1.5~~$9.0 million in mortgage ~~securities.~~securities as of March 31, 2017. The Company's marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and are included in the current and non-current marketable securities line items on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. For additional information regarding the Company's marketable securities, see the condensed consolidated statements of cash flow and Note 54 ~~to the condensed consolidated financial statements.~~.

As discussed in Note 75, the Company did not make the quarterly interest payments due on March 30, ~~June 30 and September 30,~~ 2016, totaling ~~$2.7~~$0.9 million, as required under the Company's three series of ~~Senior~~2011 Notes and three related Indentures (each as defined in Note 72). These interest payments were not made within 30 days after they became due and payable, and remain unpaid, such non-payment constituting events of default under the Indentures. The trustee under any Indenture or the holders of not less than 25% of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding ~~Senior~~2011 Notes issued pursuant to such Indenture, by notice in writing to the Company (and to the trustee if given by the holders), ~~may~~was able to declare the principal amount of all of the ~~Senior~~2011 Notes issued under such Indenture to be due and payable immediately. On May 9, 2016, the Company received a notice of acceleration with respect to the Series 1 ~~Senior~~2011 Notes and the Series 2 ~~Senior~~2011 Notes declaring all principal and unpaid interest immediately due and payable. A similar acceleration notice was received on June 6, 2016 with respect to the Series 3 ~~Senior~~2011 Notes. Because the Senior Notes are expected to be impacted by the bankruptcy reorganization process, the Company discontinued accrued interest on the notes after the date of the Bankruptcy Petitions (as defined below). As of ~~September 30,~~

~~2016~~March 31, 2017 the aggregate outstanding principal under the ~~Senior~~2011 Notes was $85.9 million, and the recorded aggregate interest liability was ~~$2.0~~$4.7 million.

~~The Company's available cash and other liquid assets are not sufficient to meet the demands of the holders of the Senior Notes.~~ As discussed in Note 2, ~~to the condensed consolidated financial statements,~~ the Company and three of its subsidiaries filed voluntary petitions (the “Bankruptcy Petitions”) for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland (the “Bankruptcy Court”). These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. ~~Management intends~~

We have taken action to ~~reorganize~~alleviate the substantial doubt raised by our historical operating results and ~~exit~~to satisfy expected liquidity needs that will arise within the ~~Chapter 11~~12 months from the issuance of these condensed consolidated financial statements. These actions included completing our Plan (as defined in Note 2), completing our Note Refinancing and acquiring an operating business, which is anticipated to be cash flow positive, each effective July 27, 2017. The terms of the 2017 Notes (as defined in Note 10), issued in exchange for the 2011 Notes in our Note Refinancing, allow the Company to obtain additional financing based on the accounts receivable and inventory of operating subsidiaries. The Company is aggressively pursuing such financing. Other actions the Company has taken include significantly reducing corporate overhead costs. Excluding the cost of reorganization, the Company has reduced compensation and other general and administrative expense by reducing staff, eliminating office space and paring back other administrative costs.

The Company acknowledges that it continues to face significant liquidity challenges. The cost of the bankruptcy proceedings have placed demands on the Company's liquidity resources. While no principal is due for many years on the 2017 Notes, the on-

going interest costs are significant and ~~will actively pursue negotiation with~~ the ~~holders~~rate is variable. If HCS and the Company's other investments do not perform as expected and/or we are unable to ~~modify or restructure the Senior Notes. However, there can~~obtain other funding sources, we may not be ~~no assurance that these efforts will be successful.~~able to meet financial obligations.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a basis that assumes the Company will continue as a going concern and contemplates the continuity of operations, realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business.

Financial Statement Presentation – The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the period. The Company uses estimates and judgments in establishing the fair value of its mortgage securities, assessing the recoverability of its long-lived assets, and accounting for income taxes, including the determination of the timing of the establishment or release of the valuation allowance related to the deferred tax asset balances and reserves for uncertain tax positions. While the condensed consolidated financial statements and footnotes reflect the best estimates and judgments of management at the time, actual results could differ significantly from those estimates.

Financial statements for the period following the Chapter 11 filing through the confirmation of a plan of reorganization distinguish transactions and events that are directly associated with the reorganization from the ongoing operations of the business. Accordingly, revenue, expenses, realized gains and losses and provision for losses directly associated with the reorganization or restructuring of the business are reported separately as Reorganization items, net, in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. The condensed consolidated balance sheet distinguishes pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise, pre-petition liabilities that are not subject to compromise and post-petition liabilities. Liabilities subject to comprise are reported at the amounts expected to be allowed, even if they may be settled for lesser amounts. In addition, cash used for reorganization items is disclosed separately in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company's condensed consolidated statement of cash flows includes a reclassification correction of $0.4 million from accretion of marketable securities to proceeds from sales and maturities of marketable securities. The reclassification was made to correct an error in that statement as previously presented.

Cash equivalents consist of liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value.

The condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company include the accounts of all wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company's condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited. In the opinion of management, all necessary adjustments have been made, which were of a normal and recurring nature, for a fair presentation of the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company's condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements of the Company and the notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~fiscal~~ year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 (the ~~"2015~~"2016 Form 10-K").

Note 2. Reorganization

On July 20, 2016, (the "Bankruptcy Petition Date"), Novation and three of its subsidiaries, NovaStar Mortgage LLC, NovaStar Mortgage Funding Corporation and 2114 Central LLC (collectively, the “Debtors”), filed the Bankruptcy Petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. The Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases (the “Chapter 11 Cases”) ~~are~~were being jointly administered under the case Novation Companies, Inc., et al, No. 16-19745-DER. The Debtors will continue to operate their businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. Beginning with the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016, the Company accounts for the bankruptcy in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 852, “Reorganizations.”

~~Pursuant to orders granted by the Bankruptcy Court, the Company obtained approval to, among other things, pay employee wages and benefits and continue with its existing cash management practices.~~ The Company ~~can conduct normal business activities~~ and ~~pay all associated obligations for the period following~~one of its bankruptcy filing, and is also authorized to pay and has paid pre-petition employee wages and benefits. During the Chapter 11 Cases, all transactions outside the ordinary course of business require the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court.

Generally, under the Bankruptcy Code, the filing of the Bankruptcy Petitions automatically enjoined, or stayed, the continuation of most judicial or administrative proceedings or filing of other actions against the Debtors or their property to recover, collect or secure a claim arising prior to the date of the Bankruptcy Petitions. Accordingly, creditors are generally stayed from taking any actions against the Debtors. Absent an order of the Bankruptcy Court, substantially all of the Debtors’ pre-petition liabilities are subject to discharge under the Bankruptcy Code.

Under the priority requirements established by the Bankruptcy Code, unless creditors agree otherwise, pre-petition liabilities to creditors and post-petition liabilities must be satisfied in full before the holders of the Company’s existing common stock are entitled to receive any distribution or retain any property under a plan of reorganization. The ultimate recovery to creditors and shareholders, if any, will not be determined until confirmation and implementation of a plan of reorganization or an alternative transaction. While the Company will seek to implement a plan of reorganization, the outcome of the Chapter 11 Cases remains

~~uncertain and, as a result, the Company cannot accurately estimate the amounts or value of distributions that creditors and shareholders may receive.~~

For the duration of the Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings, the Company’s operations and ability to develop and execute its business plan are subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with the Chapter 11 process. As a result of these risks and uncertainties, the number of the Company’s outstanding shares and shareholders, assets, liabilities, officers and directors could be significantly different following the outcome of the Chapter 11 Cases, and the description of the Company’s operations, assets and plans included herein may not accurately reflect its operations, assets and plans following the Chapter 11 process.

Subject to certain exceptions, under the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors may assume, assign, or reject certain executory contracts and unexpired leases subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court. Generally, the rejection of an executory contract or unexpired lease is treated as a pre-petition breach of such executory contract or unexpired lease and, subject to certain exceptions, relieves the Debtors of performing their future obligations under such executory contract or unexpired lease but entitles the contract counterparty or lessor to a pre-petition general unsecured claim for damages caused by such deemed breach. Counterparties to such rejected contracts or leases may assert unsecured claims in the Bankruptcy Court against the applicable Debtors’ estate for such damages. Generally, the assumption of an executory contract or unexpired lease requires the Debtors to cure existing monetary defaults under the executory contract or unexpired lease and provide adequate assurance of future performance. Accordingly, any description of an executory contract or unexpired lease with the Debtors in the interim financial statements, including where applicable a quantification of the Company’s obligations under any such executory contract or unexpired lease with the Debtors is qualified by any overriding rejection rights the Company has under the Bankruptcy Code. Further, nothing herein is or shall be deemed (i) an admission with respect to any claim amounts or calculations arising from the rejection of any executory contract or unexpired lease and the Debtors expressly preserve all of their rights with respect thereto, (ii) a waiver of any rights, claims, actions or defenses that the Company may have in respect of any given executory contract or unexpired leases or (iii) an affirmation by the Company to assume any given executory contract or unexpired lease.

There can be no assurances regarding the Company’s ability to successfully develop, confirm and consummate a plan of reorganization or any other plans of reorganization or alternative restructuring transactions.

~~On August 1, 2016, the United States Trustee for the District of Maryland appointed an official committee for unsecured creditors of all of the Debtors (the “UCC”).~~

~~On August 23, 2016, the Debtors~~subsidiaries subsequently filed with the Bankruptcy Court, ~~a Schedule of Assets~~ and Liabilities and Statement of Financial Affairs (collectively, the “Schedules and Statements”) setting forth, among other things, the assets and liabilities of the Debtors, subject to the assumptions filed in connection therewith. The Schedules and Statements may be subject to further amendment or modification after filing. Certain holders of pre-petition claims are required to file proofs of claim by the deadline for filing certain proofs of claims in the Debtors’ Chapter 11 Cases, which deadline is November 15, 2016, for pre-petition general unsecured claims and January 17, 2017, for governmental claims. Differences between amounts scheduled by the Debtors and claims by creditors will be investigated and resolved in connection with the claims resolution process. The ultimate number and amount of allowed claims is not presently known, nor can the ultimate recovery with respect to allowed claims be presently ascertained.

~~Under the Bankruptcy Code, we have the exclusive right to file~~amended, a plan of reorganization ~~under Chapter 11 through~~for the resolution of the outstanding claims against and ~~including November 17, 2016,~~interests pursuant to Section 1121(a) of the Bankruptcy Code (as amended and supplemented, the “Plan”) and a related disclosure statement. The Bankruptcy Court entered an order on June 12, 2017 confirming the Plan (the “Confirmation Order”) solely with respect to ~~solicit acceptances~~the Company, which provided that the effective date of ~~such plan through January 16, 2017.~~ the Plan will occur when all conditions precedent to effectiveness, as set forth in the Plan, have been satisfied or waived.

Two of the conditions to the effectiveness of the Plan were (i) the closing of the Company’s acquisition (the “HCS Acquisition”) of all of the capital stock of HCS as discussed in Note 10 and (ii) the restructuring (the “Note Refinancing”) of the Company’s outstanding Series 1 Notes, Series 2 Notes and Series 3 Notes (collectively, the “2011 Notes”), held by Taberna Preferred Funding I, Ltd. (“Taberna I”), Taberna Preferred Funding II, Ltd. (“Taberna II”) and Kodiak CDO I, Ltd. (“Kodiak” and, together with Taberna I and Taberna II, the “Noteholders”), issued pursuant to three Indentures, each dated as of March 22, 2011 (collectively, the “Indentures”), between the Company and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association. The HCS Acquisition and the Note Refinancing were completed on July 27, 2017, and are discussed in Note 10.

On ~~October 19, 2016,~~July 27, 2017, upon the completion of the HCS Acquisition and the Note Refinancing, and the satisfaction or waiver of all other conditions precedent to effectiveness, the effective date of the Plan occurred and the Company filed a motion to extend their exclusive right to file a plan(s) for an additional ninety days, through and including February 15, 2017 and solicit acceptances thereof through and including April 17, 2017, subject toNotice of Occurrence of Effective Date of the right to seek further extensions. The UCC filed an objection to the motion to extend the exclusive periods. At a hearing held on November 9, 2016, the Bankruptcy Court granted the Company’s motion and extended the exclusive periods for an additional ninety days.

We plan to emerge from our Chapter 11 Cases after we obtain approval from the Bankruptcy Court for a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. Among other things, a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization will determine the rights and satisfy the claims of our creditors and security holders. The terms and conditions of a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization will be determined through negotiationsPlan with ~~our stakeholders and, possibly, decisions by~~ the Bankruptcy Court. Under the absolute priority scheme established by the Bankruptcy Code, unless our creditors agree otherwise, all of our pre-petition liabilities and post-petition liabilities must be satisfied in full before thePlan, holders of ~~our~~ existing equity interests in the Company (i.e., the common ~~stock can receive any distribution or~~stock) retain any property under a plan of reorganization. The ultimate recovery to creditors and/or shareholders, if any, will not be determined until confirmation and implementation of a plan or plans of reorganization. We can give no assurance that any recovery or distribution of any amount will be made to any of our creditors or shareholders. Our plan of reorganization could result in any of the holders of our liabilities and/or securities, including our common stock, receiving no distribution on account of their interests and cancellation of their holdings. Moreover, a plan of reorganization can be confirmed, under the Bankruptcy Code, even if the holders of our common stock vote against the plan and even if the plan provides that the holders of our common stock receive no distribution on account of their equity interests.

The condensed consolidated financial statements presented here include amounts classified as “liabilities subject to compromise.” This amount represents estimates of known or potential pre-petition claims expected to be resolved in connection with our Chapter 11 proceedings. Additional amounts may be included in liabilities subject to compromise in future

periods if we elect to reject executory contracts and unexpired leases as part of our Chapter 11 Cases. Due to the uncertain nature of many of the potential claims, the magnitude of potential claims is not reasonably estimable at this time. Potential claims not currently included with liabilities subject to compromise in our consolidated balance sheets may be material. Differences between amounts we are reporting as liabilities subject to compromise in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and the amounts attributable to such matters claimed by our creditors or approved by the Bankruptcy Court may be material. We will continue to evaluate our liabilities throughout the Chapter 11 process and may make adjustments in future periods as necessary and appropriate. These adjustments may be material.

Under the Bankruptcy Code, we may assume, assign, or reject executory contracts and unexpired leases, subject to the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and other conditions. If we reject a contract or lease, such rejection generally is treated as a pre-petition breach of the contract or lease, subject to exceptions, relieves the Debtors of performing their future obligations under such contract or lease and entitles the counterparty thereto to a pre-petition general unsecured claim for damages caused by the breach. If we assume an executory contract or unexpired lease, we are generally required to cure any existing monetary defaults under the contract or lease and provide adequate assurance of future performance to the counterparty. Accordingly, any description of an executory contract or unexpired lease in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including any quantification of our obligations under any such contract or lease, is wholly qualified by the rejection rights we have under the Bankruptcy Code. Further, nothing herein is or shall be deemed an admission with respect to any claim amounts or calculations arising from the rejection of any executory contract or unexpired lease and we expressly preserve all of our rights with respect thereto. As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, liabilities subject to compromise include (in thousands):


Obligations under the Senior Notes (see Note 7), including accrued interest through the petition date	$	87,918
Liabilities associated with the discontinued operations of Advent	2,236
Obligations under the 2011 Notes (see Note 5), including accrued interest through the petition date			$	90,634
Liabilities associated with the discontinued operations of Advent Financial Services LLC			173
Claims and other liabilities related to operating leases	658		715
Income tax liabilities	300		315
Other	282		134
Liabilities subject to compromise	$	91,394	$	91,971

To the best of our knowledge, we ~~have~~ notified all of our known current or potential creditors that the Debtors have filed Chapter 11 Cases. In addition, on August 23, 2016, each of the Debtors filed the Schedules and Statements with the Bankruptcy Court. These documents set forth, among other things, the assets and liabilities of each of the Debtors, including executory contracts to which each of the Debtors is a party. The Schedules and Statements are subject to the qualifications and assumptions included therein, and ~~are~~were subject to amendment or modification as our Chapter 11 Cases ~~proceed.~~proceeded. Many of the claims identified in the Schedules and Statements are listed as disputed, contingent or unliquidated. In addition, there may be differences between the amounts for certain claims listed in the Schedules and Statements and the amounts claimed by our creditors. These differences ~~will be~~were investigated and resolved as part of our claims resolution process in our Chapter 11 Cases. Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure, creditors who wish to assert pre-petition claims against us and whose claim (i) is not listed in the Schedules and Statements or (ii) is listed in the Schedules and Statements as disputed, contingent, or unliquidated, must file a proof of claim with the Bankruptcy Court prior to the bar date set by the court. The bar dates are November 15, 2016, for non-governmental creditors, and January 17, 2017, for governmental creditors.

As of November 9, 2016, approximately $228.7 million in claims have been filed with the Bankruptcy Court against the Debtors by 9 claimants. We expect additional claims to be filed prior to the bar dates. In addition, creditors who have already filed claims may amend or modify their claims in ways we cannot now predict. The amounts of additional claims may be material. Similarly, amendments or modifications to claims already filed may be material. We will investigate and evaluate all claims in connection with our plan of reorganization. As part of the process, we will work to resolve differences in amounts scheduled by the Debtors and the amounts of claims filed by creditors, including through the filing of objections with the Bankruptcy Court where appropriate.

We have substantial tax net operating loss carryforwards and other tax attributes. Under the U.S. Internal Revenue Code (the "Code"), our ability to use these net operating losses and other tax attributes may be limited if we experience a change of control, as determined under the Code. Accordingly, we obtained an order from the Bankruptcy Court that is intended to protect our ability to use our tax attributes by imposing certain notice procedures and transfer restrictions on the trading of the Company’s common stock. In general, the order applies to any person or entity that, directly or indirectly, beneficially owns (or would beneficially own as a result of a proposed transfer) at least 4.5% of the Company’s common stock. Such persons are required to notify us and the Bankruptcy Court before effecting a transaction that might result in us losing the ability to use our tax attributes, and we have the right to seek an injunction to prevent the transaction if it might adversely affect our ability to use our tax attributes. Any purchase, sale or other transfer of our equity securities in violation of the restrictions of the order is null and void ab initio as an act in violation of a Bankruptcy Court order and would therefore confer no rights on a proposed transferee.

We have incurred ~~and will continue to incur~~ significant costs associated with our reorganization and the Chapter 11 proceedings. ~~We expect these~~These costs, which are being expensed as incurred, will significantly affect our results of ~~operations. In addition, a non-cash charge to write-off~~operations through the ~~unamortized debt issuance costs related to our Senior Notes is included in~~

~~“Reorganization items, net” as these debt instruments are expected to be impacted by~~effective date of the ~~bankruptcy reorganization process.~~Plan. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 reorganization items include (in thousands):


Adjustments to deferred debt issuance costs and senior debt premium	$	2,399
Professional fees	(763		)	$	(1,168	)
Adjustments to other liabilities for claims made or rejected contracts	(293		)	(33		)
Other	(17		)	(9		)
Reorganization items, net	$	1,326		$	(1,210	)

Note 3. ~~New Accounting Pronouncements~~

On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-15, which amends the guidance in ASC 230 on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The primary purpose of the ASU is to reduce the diversity in practice that has resulted from the lack of consistent principles on this topic. The ASU’s amendments add or clarify guidance on eight cash flow issues:

~~Debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs.~~

~~Settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing.~~

~~Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination.~~

~~Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims.~~

~~Proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies.~~

~~Distributions received from equity method investees.~~

~~Beneficial interests in securitization transactions.~~

~~Separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle.~~

For the Company, the new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Management has not determined if this guidance will have a significant impact on its financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 Leases, a new standard on accounting for leases. ASU 2016-02 introduces a lessee model that brings most leases on the balance sheet. The new standard also aligns many of the underlying principles of the new lessor model with those in ASC 606, the FASB’s new revenue recognition standard (e.g., those related to evaluating when profit can be recognized). Furthermore, this ASU addresses other concerns related to the current leases model. For example, this ASU eliminates the requirement in current GAAP for an entity to use bright-line tests in determining lease classification. The standard also requires lessors to increase the transparency of their exposure to changes in value of their residual assets and how they manage that exposure. The new model represents a wholesale change to lease accounting. As a result, entities will face significant implementation challenges during the transition period and beyond, such as those related to:

~~Applying judgment and estimating.~~

~~Managing the complexities of data collection, storage, and maintenance.~~

~~Enhancing information technology systems to ensure their ability to perform the calculations necessary for compliance with reporting requirements.~~

~~Refining internal controls and other business processes related to leases.~~

~~Determining whether debt covenants are likely to be affected and, if so, working with lenders to avoid violations; and~~

~~Addressing any income tax implications.~~

For the Company, the new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Management has not yet determined if this guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which amends the guidance in GAAP on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. Although the ASU retains many current requirements, it significantly revises an entity’s accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. This ASU also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. For Novation, the new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Management has not yet determined if this guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

~~Note 4.~~ Divestitures

Corvisa LLC ~~(Cloud SaaS Segment)~~

On December 21, 2015, the Company entered into the Corvisa Purchase Agreement with Corvisa Services and ShoreTel. Subject to the terms and conditions ~~under~~of the Corvisa Purchase Agreement, ShoreTel agreed to purchase 100% of the membership interests of Corvisa. The Corvisa ~~from Corvisa Services, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The transaction~~Sale closed on January 6, 2016. The aggregate consideration for the transaction ~~was~~included $8.4 million in cash, subject to a potential post-closing working capital ~~adjustment. At closing~~adjustment, of which $7.0 million was paid at the closing and the following was deposited in escrow: (i) $1.0 million for a period of twelve months to secure certain indemnification obligations of the Company; and (ii) $0.35 million to secure certain obligations of the Company in connection with the post-closing working capital adjustment.

In connection with the ~~transaction,~~Corvisa Sale, the Company and ShoreTel also ~~entered~~agreed to enter into a ~~transition services agreement~~Transition Services Agreement pursuant to which each of the Company and ShoreTel would provide the other with specified services for a transition period following the closing. ~~Cash~~The transition period ended in the second quarter of 2016, the cash flows associated with these services ~~are~~were not ~~significant. Other than finalizing the post-closing conditions as provided above,~~significant and the Company ~~will have~~has no continuing involvement with ~~Corvisa beyond the transition services.~~

During 2015, the Company incurred approximately $0.8 million in severance and related one-time termination benefits associated with this transaction. Approximately $0.1 million of this expense was included in current liabilities of discontinued operations at December 31, 2015. Also during 2015, the Company incurred $0.5 million of legal and audit fees related to this transaction. Due to the timing of the sale, no portion of these costs is reflected in the net loss from discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.Corvisa.

The Company recognized a gain on the transaction of $1.4 million during the first quarter of 2016, which is reflected in the ~~loss~~income (loss) from discontinued operations. The gain includes $0.7 million related to the post-closing working capital adjustment, which includes the release of the $0.35 million held in escrow and $0.3 million for the working capital adjustment, as calculated in accordance with the terms of the Purchase Agreement. Also included in discontinued operations during the first quarter of 2016 are transaction-related costs that were contingent upon the closing of the sale. These costs include approximately $0.3 million of earned bonus payments to a Corvisa executive, $1.0 million of advisory fees and $0.1 million of other transaction-related costs. During the first quarter of 2017, the Company received $1.0 million from the release of the indemnification escrow which was recorded as a gain and included in discontinued operations.

At ShoreTel’s request, the Company disposed of Corvisa’s third-party software implementation consulting business in December 2015. The Company sold the assets related exclusively to this business, including but not limited to customer contracts, computer hardware and marketing materials, to Canpango LLC (“Canpango”), which agreed to hire certain employees of the business, to assume Corvisa’s obligations under the customer contracts and to pay to the Company a portion of the business’s existing accounts receivable collected in the next ~~nine~~9 months, less associated collection costs. Canpango is led by a former employee of Corvisa and certain current and former employees of Corvisa have financial interests in Canpango. The sales price, assets and operations related exclusively to this business were not material to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~Prior to 2015, the Company disposed of its ownership interests in StreetLinks. Also prior to 2015, the Company sold a portion of the assets and conducted an orderly wind-down of Advent.~~

Results of Discontinued Operations

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2015, net loss from discontinued operations consists primarily of~~March 31, 2017 the net ~~operating losses of Corvisa and any necessary eliminations and~~ income ~~tax expense. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 the net loss~~ from discontinued operations consists of the ~~gain on~~release of the ~~sale of Corvisa, offset by transaction-related costs.~~indemnification escrow.

The results of the Company's discontinued operations are summarized below (in thousands):


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Three Months Ended September 30,					For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016		2015			2017		2016
Service fee income	$	—		$	2,557		$	—	$	877		$	—	$	—

Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes	$	(77	)	$	(18,388	)	$	—	$	(6,532	)	$	1,020	$	(65	)
Income tax expense (benefit)	—			—			—		—			—		—
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes	$	(77	)	$	(18,388	)	$	—	$	(6,532	)	$	1,020	$	(65	)

The assets and liabilities of discontinued operations as of September 30, 2016 relate entirely to Advent. As of September 30, 2016, the current liabilities of discontinued operations were comprised of unclaimed funds and fees withheld from Advent's business partners for various violations of Advent's compliance program. Unclaimed funds will be escheated to the applicable state in accordance with unclaimed property laws. Obligations relating to fees withheld from business partners will be resolved when claims are received or when the statute of limitations for the related contractual obligation expires. Noncurrent liabilities of discontinued operations consist of fees withheld from business partners for various violations of Advent's compliance program. The classification of these fees held as current versus noncurrent is dependent on the nature of the compliance violation and the tax year during which the violation occurred. The assets and liabilities of discontinued operations as of December 31, 2015 include the assets and liabilities of Advent and Corvisa. Because the obligations of the discontinued operations arose prior to the Company's Bankruptcy Petitions, the obligations of discontinued operations are classified as liabilities subject to compromise subsequent to the petition date.

The major classes of assets and liabilities of discontinued operations ~~as of September 30, 2016and December 31, 2015~~ are ~~detailed below (dollars in~~(in thousands).:


					As of
	September 30, 2016 (unaudited)		December 31, 2015		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Assets
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	196	$	352	$	173	$	195
Service fee receivable, net	—		282
Other	252		1,209		251		252
Total current assets	448		1,843		424		447
Non-Current Assets
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation	—		5,708
Other	—		707
Total non-current assets	—		6,415
Total assets	$	448	$	8,258	$	424	$	447

Liabilities
Current liabilities	$	—	$	2,470
Non-current liabilities	—		1,833
Liabilities subject to compromise	2,236		—		$	173	$	195
Total liabilities	$	2,236	$	4,303	$	173	$	195

Note 5.4. Marketable Securities

The following table presents certain information on the Company's portfolio of available-for-sale securities at ~~September 30, 2016~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2015~~(in thousands):


	As of September 30, 2016 (unaudited)									As of March 31, 2017 (unaudited)
			Gross Unrealized							Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Estimated Fair Value
Description of Securities	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Estimated Fair Value
Marketable securities, current
Mortgage securities										$	420	$	8,590	$	—		$	9,010
Equity securities	$	11,851	$	4,045	$	(7	)	$	15,889	112		59		(6		)	165
Mortgage securities	441		1,058		—			1,499
Total	$	12,292	$	5,103	$	(7	)	$	17,388	$	532	$	8,649	$	(6	)	$	9,175

Marketable securities, non-current
Corporate notes and bonds	$	254	$	548	$	—		$	802
Total	$	254	$	548	$	—		$	802
Agency mortgage-backed securities										$	25,834	$	15	$	(44	)	$	25,805

	As of December 31, 2015									As of December 31, 2016
			Gross Unrealized							Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized					Estimated Fair Value
Description of Securities	Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Estimated Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gains		Losses			Estimated Fair Value
Marketable securities, current
Corporate notes and bonds	$	15,517	$	—	$	(28	)	$	15,489
Mortgage securities	525		1,486		—			2,011		$	450	$	9,341	$	—		$	9,791
Equity securities										112		47		(7		)	152

Total	$	16,042	$	1,486	$	(28	)	$	17,500	$	562	$	9,388	$	(7	)	$	9,943

Marketable securities, non-current
Corporate notes and bonds	$	1,419	$	—	$	(22	)	$	1,397
Total	$	1,419	$	—	$	(22	)	$	1,397

Agency mortgage-backed securities										$	26,607	$	—	$	(62	)	$	26,545

Prior to ~~2008,~~2016, the Company originated, purchased, securitized, sold, invested in and serviced residential nonconforming mortgage loans and mortgage securities. As a result of those activities, the Company holds mortgage securities that continue to be a source of its earnings and cash flow. As of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016, these mortgage securities consisted entirely of the Company's investment in the residual securities issued by securitization trusts sponsored by the Company. Residual securities consist of interest-only, prepayment penalty and overcollateralization bonds.

There were no other-than-temporary impairments relating to available-for-sale securities for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and ~~2015. The weighted average remaining maturity of the Company’s short-term and long-term corporate notes and bonds at September 30, 2016 was 19 months.~~2016. Maturities of mortgage securities owned by the Company depend on repayment characteristics and experience of the underlying financial instruments. See Note 97 ~~to the condensed consolidated financial statements~~ for details on the Company's fair value methodology.

The following table relates to the securitizations where the Company retained an interest in the assets issued by the securitization trust (in thousands):

Size/Principal Outstanding (A) Assets on Balance Sheet (B) Liabilities on Balance Sheet Maximum Exposure to Loss(C) Year to Date Loss on Sale Year to Date Cash Flows (D)
September 30, 2016 $ 3,287,616
$ 1,499
$ —
$ 1,499
$ —
$ 3,719
December 31, 2015 3,601,468
2,011
—
2,011
—
6,287



	Size/Principal Outstanding (A)		Assets on Balance Sheet (B)		Liabilities on Balance Sheet		Maximum Exposure to Loss(C)		Year to Date Loss on Sale		Year to Date Cash Flows (D)
March 31, 2017	$	3,091,335	$	9,010	$	—	$	9,010	$	—	$	1,020
December 31, 2016	3,185,270		9,791		—		9,791		—		1,108


(A)	Size/Principal Outstanding reflects the estimated principal of the underlying assets held by the securitization trust.


(B)	Assets on balance sheet are securities issued by the entity and are recorded in the current marketable securities line item on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.


(C)	The maximum exposure to loss includes the assets held by the Company. The maximum exposure to loss assumes a total loss on the referenced assets held by the securitization trust.


(D)	Year to date cash flows are for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015~~, ~~respectively.~~respectively

~~Note 6. Property and Equipment, Net~~

All of the Company's property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The estimated useful lives of the Company's property and equipment are the lesser of 5 ~~years or remaining lease term for leasehold improvements,~~ 5 ~~years for furniture and fixtures,~~ 3 to 5 ~~years for office and computer equipment, and 1 to~~ 3 ~~years for software.~~

Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense. Major renewals and improvements are capitalized. Gains and losses on dispositions are credited or charged to earnings as incurred. Depreciation expense for property and equipment is not material. Office furniture with a carrying value of $94,000 was written down to its fair value of $20,000 on June 30, 2016, resulting in an impairment charge of $74,000.

~~The following table shows the Company's property and equipment (in thousands):~~

September 30, 2016 (unaudited) December 31,
2015
Furniture, fixtures and office equipment $ 73

$ 314
Leasehold improvement 317

402
Hardware and computer equipment 71

157
Software —

547
Total Cost 461

1,420
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization (319 )
(1,062 )
Property and equipment, net $ 142

$ 358

Note 7.5. Borrowings - 2011 Notes

~~Senior Notes.~~ ~~The~~As of March 31, 2017, the Company ~~has~~had outstanding three series of unsecured senior notes ~~(collectively,~~(referred to as the ~~"Senior~~"2011 Notes") pursuant to three separate indentures ~~(collectively,~~(referred to as the “Indentures”) with an aggregate principal balance of $85.9 million. The ~~Senior~~2011 Notes were created through an exchange of the Company's previously outstanding junior subordinated notes that occurred prior to 2015. This exchange was considered a modification of a debt instrument for accounting purposes. Through the Bankruptcy Petition ~~date,~~Date, the Company used the effective interest method to accrete from the principal balance as of the modification date to the carrying balance as of any reporting date. Under the effective interest method, significant changes in the rate at which a debt instrument accrues interest over its term can result in a recorded balance in excess of the aggregate principal balance of the debt instrument. As of the Bankruptcy Petition ~~date,~~Date, the Company charged off the entire difference between the contractual principal amount of the ~~Senior~~2011 Notes and their carrying value as these notes ~~are~~were expected to be impacted by the bankruptcy reorganization process.

The ~~Senior~~2011 Notes accrued interest at a rate of 1.0% per annum until January 1, 2016 and ~~since~~ then ~~have~~ accrued interest at a rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum (the “Full Rate”). Interest on the ~~Senior~~2011 Notes was payable on a quarterly basis and no principal payments were due until maturity on March 30, 2033. ~~However, the~~The Company did not make the quarterly interest payments due on March 30, ~~June 30 and September 30,~~ 2016 totaling ~~$2.7~~$0.9 million. These interest payments were not made within 30 days after they became due and payable, and remain unpaid, such non-payments constituting events of default under the Indentures. As a result, the ~~Senior~~2011 Notes ~~have been~~were classified as current ~~liabilities in the September 30, 2016 balance~~

~~sheet.~~liabilities. The trustee under any Indenture or the holders of not less than 25% of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding ~~Senior~~2011 Notes issued pursuant to such Indenture, by notice in writing to the Company (and to the trustee if given by the holders), ~~may~~was able to declare the principal amount of all the ~~Senior~~2011 Notes issued under such Indenture to be due and payable immediately. On May 9, 2016, the Company received a notice of acceleration with respect to the Series 1 ~~Senior~~2011 Notes and the Series 2 ~~Senior~~2011 Notes, declaring all principal and unpaid interest immediately due and payable. A similar acceleration notice was received on June 6, 2016 with respect to the Series 3 ~~Senior~~2011 Notes.

~~Because the Senior Notes are expected to be impacted by the bankruptcy reorganization process, the Company discontinued accrued interest on the notes after the Bankruptcy Petition date.~~ The aggregate outstanding principal under the ~~Senior~~2011 Notes iswas $85.9 million and the aggregate recorded interest liability is ~~$2.0~~$4.7 million. The principal and recorded unpaid interest are classified as liabilities subject to compromise in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet. Had the Company continued the accrual of interest on the Senior Notes, interest expense and accounts payable and accrued expenses would have been higher and net income lower by $0.7 million during the three and nine months periods ended September 30, 2016.

~~The Indentures contain certain restrictive covenants (the “Negative Covenants”) subject to certain exceptions~~As discussed in Note 10 on July 27, 2017 the ~~Indentures, including written consent of~~2011 Notes were exchanged for the holders of the Senior Notes. The Negative Covenants prohibit the Company and its subsidiaries, from among other things, incurring debt, permitting any lien upon any of its property or assets, making any cash dividend or distribution or liquidation payment, acquiring shares of the Company or its subsidiaries, making payment on debt securities of the Company that rank ~~pari passu~~ ~~or junior to the Senior~~2017 Notes ~~or disposing of any equity interest in certain subsidiaries or all or substantially all~~of the assets of certain subsidiaries unless certain conditions are met. The Negative Covenants remain in effect until the Company satisfies certain financial covenants (the “Financial Covenants”). Satisfaction of the Financial Covenants requires the Company to demonstrate on a consolidated basis that (1) its Tangible Net Worth is equal to or greater than ~~$40 million, and (2) either (a) the Interest Coverage Ratio is equal to or greater than~~ ~~1.35x, or (b) the Leverage Ratio is not greater than~~ ~~95%~~ ~~(each such term as~~(as defined in ~~the Indentures). The Negative Covenants, as defined above, were in effect as of~~ ~~September 30, 2016~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2015. Compliance with the Financial Covenants is required only when the Company seeks to take action prohibited by the Negative Covenants that has not been approved by the holders of the Senior Notes.~~

~~With respect to the Company's recent divestiture activity, which is discussed further in~~ Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the sale of a subsidiary is not prohibited by the Negative Covenants provided that the sale is at fair market value and the proceeds are reinvested in the Company. The Company was in compliance with the Negative Covenants as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and therefore the Company was under no obligation to comply with the Financial Covenants during these periods.

10).

Note 8.6. Commitments and Contingencies

~~Contingencies~~Contingencies. –Prior to ~~2008,~~2015, the Company originated, purchased, securitized, sold, invested in and serviced residential

nonconforming mortgage loans and mortgage securities. The Company has received indemnification and loan repurchase

demands with respect to alleged violations of representations and warranties (“defects”) and with respect to other alleged

misrepresentations and contractual commitments made in loan sale and securitization agreements. These demands have been

received substantially beginning in 2006 and have continued into ~~2016.~~recent years. Prior to the Company ceasing the origination of

loans in its mortgage lending business, it sold loans to securitization trusts and other third parties and agreed to repurchase

loans with material defects and to otherwise indemnify parties to these transactions. Beginning in 1997 and ending in 2007,

affiliates of the Company sold loans to securitization trusts and third parties with the potential of such obligations. The aggregate

original principal balance of these loans was ~~$43.1~~$43.1 billion at the time of sale or securitization. The remaining principal balance of

these loans is not available as these loans are serviced by third parties and may have been refinanced, sold or liquidated.

Claims to repurchase loans or to indemnify under securitization documents have not been acknowledged as valid by the

Company. In some cases, claims were made against affiliates of the Company that have ceased operations and have no or

limited assets. The Company has not repurchased any loans or made any such indemnification payments since 2010.

Historically, repurchases of loans or indemnification of losses where a loan defect has been alleged have been insignificant and

any future losses for alleged loan defects have not been deemed to be probable or reasonably estimable; therefore, the

Company has recorded no reserves related to these claims. The Company does not use internal groupings for purposes of

determining the status of these loans. The Company is unable to develop an estimate of the maximum potential amount of future

payments related to repurchase demands because the Company does not have access to information relating to loans sold and

securitized and the number or amount of claims deemed probable of assertion is not known nor is it reasonably ~~estimable.~~ estimated.

Further, the validity of claims received remains questionable. Also, considering that the Company completed its last sale or

securitization of loans during 2007, the Company believes that it will be difficult for a claimant to successfully validate any

additional repurchase demands. Management does not expect that the potential impact of claims will be material to the

Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~Legal Proceedings~~ Pending Litigation–. The Company is a party to various legal proceedings. Except as set forth below, these proceedings are of

an ordinary and routine nature. Any legal fees associated with these proceedings are expensed as incurred.

Although it is not possible to predict the outcome of any legal proceeding, in the opinion of management, other than the active

proceedings described in detail below, proceedings and actions against the Company should not, individually, or in the

aggregate, have a material effect on the Company's financial condition, operations orand liquidity. Furthermore, due to the

uncertainty of any potential loss as a result of pending litigation and due to the Company's belief that an adverse ruling is not

probable, the Company has not accrued a loss contingency related to the following matters in its condensed consolidated financial statements. However, a material outcome in one or more of the active proceedings described below could have a material impact on the results of operations in a particular quarter or fiscal year. See Note 2 ~~to condensed consolidated financial~~

~~statements~~ for a description of the impact of the ~~Company’s~~Company's Chapter 11 Cases on these proceedings. ~~The automatic stay provided by the Bankruptcy Code is currently in effect as to the defendants in these proceedings that are Debtors in the Chapter 11 Cases.~~

On May 21, 2008, a purported class action case was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, by

the New Jersey Carpenters' Health Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated. Defendants in the case included

NovaStar Mortgage Funding Corporation ~~(NMFC)~~(“NMFC”) and NovaStar Mortgage, Inc. ~~(NMI)~~("NMI"), wholly-owned subsidiaries of the

Company, and NMFC's individual directors, several securitization trusts sponsored by the Company (“affiliated defendants”) and

several unaffiliated investment banks and credit rating agencies. The case was removed to the United States District Court for

the Southern District of New York. On June 16, 2009, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. The plaintiff seeks monetary

damages, alleging that the defendants violated sections 11, 12 and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, by making

allegedly false statements regarding mortgage loans that served as collateral for securities purchased by the plaintiff and the

purported class members. On August 31, 2009, the Company filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiff's claims, which the court

granted on March 31, 2011, with leave to amend. The plaintiff filed a second amended complaint on May 16, 2011, and the

Company again filed a motion to dismiss. On March 29, 2012, the court dismissed the plaintiff's second amended complaint with

prejudice and without leave to replead. The plaintiff filed an appeal. On March 1, 2013, the appellate court reversed the judgment

of the lower court, which had dismissed the case. Also, the appellate court vacated the judgment of the lower court which had

held that the plaintiff lacked standing, even as a class representative, to sue on behalf of investors in securities in which plaintiff

had not invested, and the appellate court remanded the case back to the lower court for further proceedings. On April 23, 2013

the plaintiff filed its memorandum with the lower court seeking a reconsideration of the earlier dismissal of plaintiff's claims as to

five offerings in which plaintiff was not invested, and on February 5, 2015 the lower court granted plaintiff's motion for

reconsideration and vacated its earlier dismissal. ~~Given~~On March 8, 2017, the ~~stage~~affiliated defendants and all other parties executed an

agreement to settle the action, with the contribution of the ~~litigation,~~affiliated defendants to the settlement fund being paid by their

insurance carriers. The court certified a settlement class and granted preliminary approval to the settlement on May 10, 2017.

One member of the settlement class objected to the settlement and sought a stay of the final settlement approval hearing on the

ground that it did not receive notice of the settlement and had no opportunity to timely opt out of the class. After the court

rejected the motion for a stay, the objector filed an appeal and requested a stay of the district court proceedings pending

disposition of the appeal. The court of appeals denied the temporary stay of the district court proceedings pending a decision

on the objector’s request for a stay. Assuming the settlement is approved and completed, the Company ~~cannot provide an estimate of the range of any~~will incur no loss. The Company believes that the affiliated defendants have meritorious defenses to the case and, if the settlement is not approved, expects them to defend the case vigorously.

On June 20, 2011, the National Credit Union Administration Board, as liquidating agent of U.S. Central Federal Credit Union,

filed an action against NMFC and numerous other defendants in the United States District Court for the District of Kansas,

claiming that the defendants issued or underwrote residential mortgage-backed securities pursuant to allegedly false or

misleading registration statements, prospectuses, and/or prospectus supplements. On August 24, 2012, the plaintiff filed an

amended complaint making essentially the same claims against NMFC. NMFC filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint

which was denied on September 12, 2013. The defendants had claimed that the case should be dismissed based upon a statute

of limitations and sought an appeal of the court's denial of this defense. An interlocutory appeal of this issue was allowed, and on

August 27, 2013, the Tenth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s denial of defendants’ motion to dismiss the plaintiff’s claims as

being time barred; the appellate court held that the Extender Statute, 12 U.S.C. §1787(b)(14) applied to plaintiff’s claims. On

June 16, 2014, the United States Supreme Court granted a petition of NMFC and its co-defendants for certiorari, vacated the

ruling of the Tenth Circuit, and remanded the case back to that court for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s

decision in CTS Corp. v. Waldburger, 134 S. Ct. 2175 (2014). On August 19, 2014, the Tenth Circuit reaffirmed its prior decision,

and on October 2, 2014 the defendants filed a petition for writ of certiorari with the Supreme Court, which was denied. On March

22, 2016, NMFC filed motions for summary judgment, and plaintiff filed a motion for partial summary judgment. Those motions

remain pending. Given ~~the stage~~that plaintiff did not file a timely proof of ~~the litigation,~~claim in NMFC’s bankruptcy case, the Company ~~cannot provide an estimate of~~believes it is

likely that the ~~range of any loss.~~case will be dismissed. The Company believes that NMFC has meritorious defenses to the case and expects it to

defend the case ~~vigorously.~~vigorously in the event it proceeds.

On February 28, 2013 the Federal Housing Finance Agency, as conservator for the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ~~(Freddie~~

(Freddie Mac) and on behalf of the Trustee of the NovaStar Mortgage Funding Trust, Series 2007-1 (the “Trust”), a securitization

trust in which the Company retains a residual interest, filed a summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New

York, County of New York against the Company and ~~NMI, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.~~NMI. The notice provides that this is a breach of contract action with respect

to certain, unspecified mortgage loans and defendant's failure to repurchase such loans under the applicable agreements.

Plaintiff alleges that defendants, from the closing date of the transaction that created the Trust, were aware of the breach of the

representations and warranties made and failed to notice and cure such breaches, and due to the failure of defendants to cure

any breach, notice to defendants would have been futile. The summons with notice was not served until June 28, 2013. By letter

dated June 24, 2013, the Trustee of the Trust forwarded a notice from Freddie Mac alleging breaches of representations and

warranties with respect to 43 loans, as more fully set forth in included documentation. The 43 loans had an aggregate, original

principal balance of about $6.5 million. On August 19, 2013, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee, filed a

complaint identifying alleged breaches of representations and warranties with respect to seven loans that were included in the

earlier list of 43 loans. Plaintiff also generally alleged a trust-wide breach of representations and warranties by defendants with

respect to loans sold and transferred to the trust. Plaintiff seeks specific performance of repurchase obligations; compensatory,

consequential, recessionary and equitable damages for breach of contract; specific performance and damages for anticipatory

breach of contract; and indemnification (indemnification against NMI only). On October 9, 2013, the Company and NMI filed a

motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. This motion to dismiss was

withdrawn after plaintiff filed an amended complaint on

January 28, 2014, and on March 4, 2014 the Company and NMI filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. ~~That motion remains pending.~~ Given the

stage of the litigation, the Company cannot provide an estimate of the range of any loss. The Company believes that it has

meritorious defenses to the case and expects to defend the case vigorously.

Note 9.7. Fair Value Accounting

Fair Value Measurements

The Company's valuation techniques are based upon observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the Company's market assumptions. These two types of inputs create the following fair value hierarchy:

•

Level 1 –- Valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

•Level 2 –- Valuations based on observable inputs in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted interest or currency exchange rates.

•Level 3 –- Valuations based on significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, such as discounted cash flow methodologies based on internal cash flow forecasts.

The following tables present for each of the fair value hierarchy levels, the Company's assets and liabilities which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis ~~as of~~ ~~September 30, 2016~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2015~~ ~~(dollars in~~(in thousands):

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description Fair Value as of
September 30, 2016 (unaudited)
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash $ 1,832
$ 1,832
$ —
$ —
Money market funds 13,085
13,085
—
—
Marketable securities, current:
Equity securities 15,889
15,889
—
—
Mortgage securities 1,499
—
—
1,499
Marketable securities, non-current:
Corporate notes and bonds 802
802
—
—
Total $ 33,107
$ 31,608
$ —
$ 1,499



March 31, 2017
			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Marketable securities, current	$	9,175	$	165	$	—	$	9,010
Marketable securities, non-current	25,805		25,805		—		—
Total	$	34,980	$	25,970	$	—	$	9,010

Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description Fair Value as of December 31, 2015
Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)

Significant Other Observable Inputs
(Level 2)

Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents:
Cash $ 1,674
$ 1,674
$ —
$ —
Money market funds 1,152
1,152
—
—
Marketable securities, current:
Corporate notes and bonds 15,489
—
15,489
—
Mortgage securities 2,011
—
—
2,011
Marketable securities, non-current:
Corporate notes and bonds 1,397
—
1,397
—
Total $ 21,723
$ 2,826
$ 16,886
$ 2,011



December 31, 2016
			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
Description	Fair Value		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Marketable securities, current	9,943		152		—		9,791
Marketable securities, non-current	26,545		26,545		—		—
Total	$	36,488	$	26,697	$	—	$	9,791

Note 4 provides risk categories for the Company's marketable securities.

Valuation Methods and Processes

~~The~~When available, the Company determines the fair value of its ~~cash equivalents and~~ marketable securities ~~based on pricing from our service provider and~~using market prices from industry-standard independent data providers. ~~Such market~~Market prices may be quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1 inputs) or pricing determined using inputs other than quoted prices that are observable either directly or indirectly (Level 2 inputs), such as yield curve, volatility factors, credit spreads, default rates, loss severity, current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments or debt, broker and dealer quotes, as well as other relevant economic measures.

To the extent observable inputs are not available, as is the case with the Company's retained mortgage securities, the Company estimates fair value using present value techniques and generally does not have the option to choose other valuation methods for these securities. The methods and processes used to estimate the fair value of the Company's retained mortgage securities are discussed further below. There have been no significant changes to the Company's valuation ~~techniques during the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016~~.techniques. Accordingly, there have been no material changes to the ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements resulting from changes to our valuation ~~techniques during the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016~~.techniques.

The Company's marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at their estimated fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income. To the extent that the cost basis of the Company's marketable securities exceeds the fair value and the unrealized loss is considered to be other than temporary, an

impairment charge is recognized and the amount recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss is reclassified to earnings as a realized loss. The specific identification method is used in computing realized gains or losses.

Mortgage securities - ~~available-for-sale~~. ~~As discussed above and in~~ ~~Note 5~~available-for-sale. ~~to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the~~The Company's mortgage securities ~~– available-for-sale, are measured at fair value. These~~include traditional agency mortgage-backed securities, ~~are valued at each reporting date using significant unobservable inputs~~with valuations based on quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level ~~3) by discounting the expected cash flows.~~1).

~~An independent entity has been engaged to prepare projected cash flows and values of~~Additionally, mortgage securities include investments that were retained during the Company's ~~mortgage~~lending and securitization process, conducted prior to 2015. For these securities, ~~for each quarterly reporting period. Estimates, made by~~ the ~~Company's provider, for key assumptions, most notably the expected life of the security, are used in estimating future cash flows.~~

The most critical assumption used in estimating the value of the mortgage securities is the length of time the security will continue to provide cash flow. The loan servicer for the underlying mortgage loans, an independent party, retainsCompany maintains the right to ~~call our~~receive excess interest and other cash flow generated through the mortgage ~~securities~~loan securitization vehicle. The Company receives the difference between the interest on the mortgage loans and ~~therefore~~ the ~~decision~~interest paid to ~~call~~ the securitization is beyond the Company's control. In the event that were to occur, the mortgage securities would discontinue generating cash flows. For purposes of valuing the mortgage securities, the independent entity we have engaged to prepare the mortgage security valuations uses a 2-year time frame, after which it is assumed that the securities have been called. Given the long-term nature of the underlying mortgages, if the mortgage security is not called by the servicer, the cash flows could extend for many years, which would indicate a significantly higher value than the Company has recorded.

~~In addition to owning mortgage securities that represent excess interest, the~~bondholders. The Company also owns overcollateralization ~~(OC)~~("OC") classes of various ~~securities.~~securitization trusts. These OC bonds represent the difference in the principal of the underlying mortgage loans compared to the bonds sold to third parties. This extra collateral serves as a cushion for losses that ~~has~~have and may occur in the

underlying mortgage pool. The OC bonds may receive cash if and when it is determined that actual losses are less than expectations. As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the aggregate overcollateralization was approximately $27.0 million. The timing and amount of cash to be generated by the OC bonds is contingent upon the performance of the underlying mortgage loan collateral.

The independent loan servicer controls and manages the individual mortgage loans and therefore the Company has no control over the loan performance. ~~Because~~Collectively, these mortgage securities are identified by the Company as "retained mortgage securities," in order to distinguish them from the Company's traditional agency mortgage-backed securities.

Retained mortgage-backed securities are valued at each reporting date using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) by discounting the expected cash flows. An independent valuation specialist has been engaged to assist management in estimating cash flows and values for the Company's mortgage securities. It is the Company's responsibility for the overall resulting valuation.

The critical assumptions used in estimating the value of the mortgage securities include market interest rates, rate and severity of default, prepayment speeds and how long the security will continue to provide cash flow. To determine the assumptions, the Company and its independent valuation specialist rely primarily on historical results mortgage loan performance and appropriate general economic indicators. The Company continuously reviews the assumptions used and monitors the efforts of the independent valuation specialist. As a result of this review during the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company and its independent valuation specialist revised key assumptions, leading to an increase in the expected cash flow and estimated value of these ~~uncertainties,~~securities. The significant assumptions used in preparing the fair value estimates are:



	March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Weighted average:
Loss severity	49.6	%	49.6	%
Default rate	2.1	%	2.1	%
Prepayment speed	9.8	%	9.8	%
Servicer's optional redemption date	None		None

Management and its valuation specialist previously relied heavily on the general historical performance of non-prime mortgage loans in developing assumptions. Management and the valuation specialist believed that the overall performance of non-prime loans was a predictor for how the loans underlying the Company's retained mortgage securities would perform. However, market trends for housing prices, labor statistics and other economic factors have consistently improved for several years. The performance of the specific loans underlying the Company's retained mortgage securities is substantially better than that of non-prime loans in general. Sufficient time has passed to suggest that these trends are sustainable. Therefore, the revised assumptions used at December 31, 2016 rely more heavily on the specific loan performance. Better performance by the underlying mortgage loans generally results in more estimated cash flow and higher values for our retained mortgage securities. Furthermore, while management and its valuation specialist assumed that a reasonable servicer would exercise its optional redemption, this has not occurred and there is no indication it will occur. Therefore, we have revised the assumption regarding the time at which the servicer will exercise its option. This serves to extend the term over which the Company ~~maintains no~~expects to receive cash from the excess interest securities, which also results in higher estimate fair values.

The improving loan performance and therefore the changes in our assumptions resulted in a change in estimate of the value ~~for the OC bonds. The Company may~~of retained mortgage securities, resulting in an increase in marketable securities, current and other comprehensive income and a decrease in the ~~future place a~~total stockholders’ deficit by $8.2 million in 2016. Adjustments to assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis did not have a material impact on the ~~OC securities.~~earnings of continuing operations for any period presented.

The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the Company's mortgage securities – available-for-sale, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) ~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (dollars in~~(in thousands):


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2017			2016
Balance, beginning of period	$	2,011		$	3,381		$	9,791		$	2,011
Increases (decreases) to mortgage securities – available-for-sale:
Accretion of income (A)							86			98
Total proceeds from paydowns of securities (A)	(84		)	(84		)	(116		)	(145		)
Market value adjustment	(428		)	(802		)	(751		)	214
Net decrease to mortgage securities – available-for-sale	(512		)	(886		)	(781		)	167
Balance, end of period	$	1,499		$	2,495		$	9,010		$	2,178

(A) Cash received on mortgage securities with no cost basis was ~~$3.3~~$0.9 million and ~~$4.2~~$1.0 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016, ~~and 2015,~~ respectively.

~~Adjustments to assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring and nonrecurring basis did not have a material impact on the earnings of continuing operations for any period presented.~~

The following disclosure of the estimated fair value of financial instruments presents amounts that have been determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methodologies could have a material impact on the estimated fair value amounts. The fair value of short-term financial assets and liabilities, such as service fees receivable, notes receivable, and accounts payable and accrued expenses are not included in the following table as their carrying value approximates their fair value.

The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments are as follows ~~as of~~ ~~September 30, 2016~~ ~~and~~ ~~December 31, 2015~~(in thousands):


									As of
	As of September 30, 2016 (unaudited)				As of December 31, 2015				March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Financial assets:
Restricted cash	$	112	$	112	$	598	$	435
Marketable securities	18,190		18,190		18,897		18,897		$	34,980	$	34,980	$	36,488	$	36,488
Financial liabilities:
Senior notes	$	85,900	$	18,629	$	88,385	$	18,331

2011 Notes									$	85,937	$	24,864	$	85,937	$	23,349

For the items in the table above not measured at fair value in the statement of financial position but for which the fair value is disclosed, the fair value has been estimated using Level 3 methodologies, based on significant unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, such as discounted cash flow calculations based on internal cash flow forecasts. No assets or liabilities have been transferred between levels during any period presented.

~~Restricted cash~~. As of September 30, 2016, the fair value of restricted cash is not material to the financial statements taken as a whole and the fair value is assumed to be equal to carrying value. As of December 31, 2015, the fair value of restricted cash was estimated by discounting estimated future releases of the cash from restriction. Restricted cash is included in the other current assets and other assets line items in the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheets.

~~Senior notes.~~2011 Notes. The fair value is estimated by discounting future projected cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with the risks involved. The value of the ~~Senior~~2011 Notes was calculated assuming that the Company would be required to pay interest at

a rate of 1.0% per annum until January 2016, at which time the Company would be required to start paying the Full Rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum until maturity in March 2033. The three-month LIBOR used in the analysis was projected using a forward interest rate curve.

Note ~~10.~~8. Income Taxes

Prior to ~~2015,~~2016, the Company determined that it was no longer more likely than not that it will recognize a portion of its deferred tax assets. Therefore, as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the Company maintained a full valuation allowance against its net deferred tax assets of ~~$279.9~~$292.6 million and ~~$281.5~~$292.2 million, respectively. The Company's determination of the extent to which its deferred tax assets will be realized requires the exercise of significant judgment, based in part on business plans and expectations about future outcomes. In the event the actual results differ from these estimates in future periods, the Company may need to adjust the valuation allowance, which could materially impact our financial position and results of operations. The Company will continue to assess the need for a valuation allowance in future periods. Because of the full valuation allowance, the Company's effective tax rate is expected to be near 0% and therefore the consolidated income tax expense is not material for any period presented.

As of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the total gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was $0.3 ~~million and $0.4 million, respectively.~~million. This amount also represents the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits that would impact the effective tax rate in the respective periods. The Company does not anticipate a material reduction of the unrecognized tax benefits due to the lapse of the related statute of limitations in the next twelve months.

Note ~~11.~~9. Earnings (loss) Per Share

Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net earnings available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share include the effect of conversions of stock options and nonvested shares. The computations of basic and diluted earnings per share ~~for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015~~ (in thousands, except share and per share amounts) are as follows:


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Three Months Ended September 30,					For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016		2015			2017			2016
Numerator:
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	$	952		$	(2,489	)	$	2,445	$	(707	)
Net loss from discontinued operations	(77		)	(18,388		)	—		(6,532		)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	875		$	(20,877	)	$	2,445	$	(7,239	)

Net loss from continuing operations												$	(2,127	)	$	(1,326	)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations												1,020			(65		)
Net loss available to common shareholders												$	(1,107	)	$	(1,391	)
Denominator:
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic	91,345,504			91,103,880			92,180,484		91,187,345			92,780,250			91,758,041

Weighted average common shares outstanding – dilutive:
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic	91,345,504			91,103,880			92,180,484		91,187,345			92,780,250			91,758,041
Stock options	—			—			—		—			—			—
Nonvested shares	840,014			—			284,627		—			—			—
Weighted average common shares outstanding – dilutive	92,185,518			91,103,880			92,465,111		91,187,345			92,780,250			91,758,041

Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.01		$	(0.03	)	$	0.03	$	(0.01	)
Net loss from discontinued operations	—			(0.20		)	—		(0.07		)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	0.01		$	(0.23	)	$	0.03	$	(0.08	)
Net loss from continuing operations												$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)
Net income from discontinued operations												0.01			—
Net loss available to common shareholders												$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)

Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Net income (loss) from continuing operations	$	0.01		$	(0.03	)	$	0.03	$	(0.01	)
Net loss from discontinued operations	—			(0.20		)	—		(0.07		)
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders	$	0.01		$	(0.23	)	$	0.03	$	(0.08	)

Net loss from continuing operations												$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)
Net income from discontinued operations												0.01			—
Net loss income available to common shareholders												$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)

The following weighted-average options to purchase shares of common stock were outstanding during each period presented, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the calculated number of shares assumed to be repurchased was greater than the number of shares to be obtained upon exercise, therefore, the effect would be anti-dilutive (in thousands, except exercise prices):


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,				For the Three Months Ended September 30,				For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016		2015		2016		2015		2017		2016
Number of stock options	4,613		10,379		4,443		10,832		2,394		5,203
Weighted average exercise price of stock options	$	0.71	$	0.62	$	0.70	$	0.62	$	0.81	$	0.70

There were no options granted during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016. Option grants for~~March 31, 2017 or during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015 were not significant.~~

March 31, 2016. As of ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company had ~~no nonvested shares outstanding. As of September 30, 2015 there were 1.5~~0.1 million nonvested shares outstanding. ~~While~~

Note 10. Subsequent Events

Acquisition of Healthcare Staffing, Inc.On February 1, 2017, the ~~nonvested shares granted during 2016~~Company entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “HCS Purchase Agreement”) with Novation Holding, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“NHI”), HCS and ~~2015 vest one year~~Butler America, LLC, the owner of HCS (“Butler” and, together with HCS, the “Seller Parties”). Pursuant to the HCS Purchase Agreement, NHI agreed to purchase from Butler all of the outstanding capital stock of HCS for $24.0 million in cash, subject to terms and conditions as provided therein, including but not limited to the Company’s receipt of bankruptcy court approval for the

HCS Acquisition in its Chapter 11 case. The purchase price is subject to a potential working capital adjustment, based on HCS having $5.0 million of working capital at closing.

On July 27, 2017, in connection with the anticipated closing of the HCS Acquisition, the Company, NHI, HCS and Butler entered into a Closing Agreement, dated as of the same date (the “Closing Agreement”), relating to certain closing matters and the terms of the HCS Purchase Agreement. The Closing Agreement provided for the following: (i) eliminate the $240,000 indemnification escrow under the HCS Purchase Agreement; (ii) provide for NHI’s reimbursement to Butler of $100,000 in costs and expenses incurred by Butler in consideration for the delay in closing the HCS Acquisition; (iii) clarify the treatment of certain of HCS’s outstanding tax obligations; (iv) provide that an adjustment to the purchase price under the HCS Purchase Agreement will be made in connection with the calculation of final closing date net working capital of HCS only if there is a difference between such amount and the pre-closing estimate of greater than 3%; and (v) make certain other changes to the HCS Purchase Agreement.

On July 27, 2017, the Company and NHI completed the HCS Acquisition pursuant to the terms of the HCS Purchase Agreement and the Closing Agreement, as a result of which HCS became a wholly-owned subsidiary of NHI. The net purchase price was allocated as shown below (in thousands):



Cash	$	1,013
Accounts receivable	6,929
Property and equipment	568
Other assets	45
Intangible assets:
Customer relationships	6,041
Trademarks	906
Non-compete agreement	583
Goodwill	11,472
Liabilities assumed - accrued payroll and related liabilities	(3,411		)

Net assets acquired	$	24,146

The purchase price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and the liabilities assumed at their estimated fair values as of the acquisition date. The fair value measurements of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed were based on valuations involving significant unobservable inputs, or Level 3 in the valuation hierarchy. The allocation of the purchase price above to the assets and liabilities are based on our preliminary assessment and is subject to further review pending the completion of an appraisal of the assets and liabilities acquired.

The gross contractual amount of accounts receivable is $6.9 million, which was determined to approximate fair value. Goodwill and trademarks are considered indefinite-lived assets and are not subject to future amortization, but will be tested for impairment at least annually. Goodwill is comprised primarily of processes for services and knowhow, assembled workforces and other intangible assets that do not qualify for separate recognition. The full amount of goodwill is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. The amortization period for the intangibles for customer relationships and the non-compete agreement are seven and three years, respectively.

The Company incurred approximately $1.2 million in fees associated with the HCS Acquisition, including $0.9 million in investment advisor fees.

Note Refinancing On July 27, 2017, the Company entered into a Senior Secured Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of the same date (the “Note Purchase Agreement”), with NHI and HCS as guarantors (together with the Company, collectively, the “Credit Parties”), the Noteholders and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as collateral agent for the benefit of the Noteholders, to refinance $85,937,500 of principal indebtedness of the Company under the 2011 Notes. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, the Noteholders exchanged their 2011 Notes for new notes from the ~~date~~Company in the same aggregate principal amount (collectively, the “2017 Notes”) on the terms and conditions set forth therein.

The unpaid principal amounts of ~~grant,~~ the ~~nonvested shares granted~~2017 Notes bear interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum, payable quarterly in ~~prior years vest ratably over their original term~~arrears until maturity on March 30, 2033. The 2017 Notes generally rank senior in right of ~~six years.~~payment to any existing or future subordinated indebtedness of the Credit Parties. The Company may at any time upon 30 days’ notice to the Noteholders redeem all or part of the 2017 Notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of the principal amount redeemed plus any accrued and unpaid interest thereon.

Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, in connection with the Note Refinancing, the Company paid all overdue and unpaid accrued interest on the 2011 Notes in the agreed, reduced aggregate amount of $5,775,779, and paid $500,000 in fees and expenses incurred by the Noteholders.

The Note Purchase Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, including but not limited to certain financial covenants. The Note Purchase Agreement also contains customary events of default, including but not limited to payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other indebtedness, breaches of covenants and bankruptcy events. In the case of an event of default, the Noteholders may, among other remedies, accelerate the payment of all obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement and the 2017 Notes.

In connection with the Note Purchase Agreement, on July 27, 2017, the Credit Parties entered into a Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of the same date, pursuant to which each of the Credit Parties granted a first priority lien generally covering all of its assets, other than accounts receivable and inventory, for the benefit of the Noteholders, to secure the obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement and the 2017 Notes.

Revolving Credit Agreement On November 17, 2017, HCS entered into a Revolving Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of the same date (the “FNCC Credit Agreement”), with Federal National Payables, Inc. (d/b/a Federal National Commercial Credit) (“FNCC”) providing HCS with a line of credit of up to $5 million. Availability under the FNCC Credit Agreement is based on a formula tied to HCS’s eligible accounts receivable, and borrowings under the FNCC Credit Agreement bear interest at the prime rate plus 1.25%. The FNCC Credit Agreement also provides for customary origination and collateral monitoring fees payable to FNCC during its term. The initial term of the FNCC Credit Agreement expires on November 17, 2018, but it will be renewed automatically for consecutive one-year terms thereafter unless the FNCC Credit Agreement is terminated pursuant to its terms. The obligations of HCS under the FNCC Credit Agreement are secured by HCS’s inventory and accounts receivable.

The FNCC Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and affirmative and negative covenants, including but not limited to financial covenants. The FNCC Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default, including but not limited to payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other indebtedness, breaches of covenants and bankruptcy events. In the case of an event of default, FNCC may, among other remedies, accelerate payment of all obligations under the FNCC Credit Agreement.

In connection with the FNCC Credit Agreement, the Company and NHI, the sole stockholder of HCS, executed guaranties in favor of FNCC guaranteeing all of HCS’s obligations under the FNCC Credit Agreement.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this report regarding Novation Companies, Inc. and its business, that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). Forward-looking statements are those that predict or describe future events, do not relate solely to historical matters and include statements regarding management's beliefs, estimates, projections, and assumptions with respect to, among other things, our future operations, business plans and strategies, as well as industry and market conditions, all of which are subject to change at any time without notice. Words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “promise,” “plan,” and other expressions or words of similar meanings, as well as future or conditional auxiliary verbs such as “would,” “should,” “could,” or “may” are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. Actual results and operations for any future period may vary materially from those discussed herein. Some important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated include: ~~the disposition and results of our Chapter 11 Cases (as defined below), our ability to identify and acquire operating business or make other investments that generate taxable earnings;~~ decreases in cash flows from our mortgage securities; our ability to remain in compliance with the agreements governing our indebtedness; the outcome of litigation actions pending against us or other legal contingencies; our compliance with applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations; compliance with new accounting pronouncements; the impact of general economic conditions; and the risks that are from time to time included in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, as amended (the ~~"2015~~"2016 Form 10-K")~~, and this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.~~. Other factors not presently identified may also cause actual results to differ. This report speaks only as of its date and we expressly disclaim any duty to update the information herein except as required by federal securities laws.

Executive Overview

The following Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Operating Results (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with the preceding unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Novation Companies, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company,” ”Novation," “we,” “us,” or "our") and the notes thereto as well as the ~~2015~~2016 Form 10-K. The MD&A includes the following sections:

Corporate Overview ~~Background and Strategy~~ – a brief overview of our business ~~current strategy,~~ and significant recent events.

Critical Accounting Policies – an update, since December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, of our discussion of accounting policies that impact our financial ~~statements and involve a high degree of judgment or complexity and a discuss of the impact of new accounting standards.~~statements.

Results of Operations – an analysis of our results of operations for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015~~ as presented in our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources – an analysis of our cash flows and financial commitments.

~~Reorganization~~Corporate Overview

Through Healthcare Staffing, Inc. ("HCS"), our wholly-owned subsidiary which was acquired on July 27, 2017, we provide outsourced health care staffing and related services in the State of Georgia. Services are performed by expert staff on-site at client facilities. We also own a portfolio of mortgage securities which generate earnings to support on-going financial obligations. Our common stock, par value $0.01 per share, is traded on the OTC Pink marketplace of the OTC Markets Group, Inc. under the symbol “NOVC”.

Corvisa Sale. On January 6, 2016, the Company sold all of the membership interests of Corvisa LLC (“Corvisa”) to ShoreTel, Inc. (“ShoreTel”), pursuant to the terms and conditions of a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2015, by and among the Company, Corvisa Services LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, and ShoreTel. Additional details of this and related transactions are discussed in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Emergence from Bankruptcy. On July 20, 2016 (the “Bankruptcy Petition Date”), Novation and three of ~~our~~its subsidiaries ~~NovaStar Mortgage LLC, NovaStar Mortgage Funding Corporation and 2114 Central, LLC (collectively, the "Debtors"~~(the “Debtors”), filed voluntary petitions (the ~~"Bankruptcy Petitions"~~“Bankruptcy Petitions”) for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland (the ~~"Bankruptcy Court"~~“Bankruptcy Court”). ~~Our~~The Debtors’ Chapter 11 cases (the ~~"Chapter~~“Chapter 11 ~~Cases"~~Cases”) ~~are~~were being jointly administered under the case Novation Companies, Inc., et al, No. 16-19745-DER. ~~We will continue to operate our businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction~~The Company and one of its subsidiaries subsequently filed with the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Bankruptcy Court. Beginning with the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016, the Company accounts for the bankruptcy in accordance with the FASB ASC 852, “Reorganizations”. Under the Bankruptcy Code, we have the exclusive right to fileamended a plan of reorganization ~~under Chapter 11 through~~(the “Plan”) and ~~including November 17, 2016,~~a related disclosure statement. The Bankruptcy Court entered an order on June 12, 2017 confirming the Plan (the “Confirmation Order”) solely with respect to the Company, which provided that the effective date of the Plan will occur when all conditions precedent to effectiveness, as set forth in the Plan, have been satisfied or waived. Two of the conditions to the effectiveness of the Plan were (i) the closing of the HCS Acquisition (as defined below) and (ii) the closing of the Note Refinancing (as defined below). The HCS Acquisition and the Note Refinancing were completed on July 27, 2017. On July 27, 2017, upon the completion of the HCS Acquisition and the Note Refinancing, and the satisfaction or waiver of all other conditions precedent to ~~solicit acceptances~~effectiveness, the effective date of ~~such plan through January 16, 2016. On October 19, 2016,~~the Plan occurred and the Company filed a motion to extend their exclusive right to file a plan(s) for an additional 90 days, through and including February 15, 2017 and solicit acceptances thereof through and including April 17, 2017, subject toNotice of Occurrence of Effective Date of the ~~right to seek further extensions. The UCC filed an objection to the motion to extend the exclusive periods. At a hearing held on November 9, 2016,~~Plan with the Bankruptcy ~~Court granted~~Court. Under the ~~Company’s motion and extended~~Plan, holders of existing equity interests in the ~~exclusive periods for an additional ninety days.~~ Company (i.e., the common stock) retain their interests.

~~Pursuant to orders granted by~~Acquisition of Healthcare Staffing, Inc. On July 27, 2017, the ~~Bankruptcy Court, we obtained approval to, among other things, pay employee wages and benefits and continue with its existing cash management practices. The~~ Company ~~is able to conduct normal business activities and pay~~acquired all associated obligations for the period following its bankruptcy filing, and is also authorized to pay and has paid pre-petition employee wages and benefits. During the Chapter 11 Cases, all transactions outside the ordinary course of business require the prior approval of the ~~Bankruptcy Court.~~

~~For the duration~~outstanding capital stock of ~~our Chapter 11 Cases, our operations and ability to develop and execute our business plan are~~

~~subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with the Chapter 11 process. For example, negative events associated with~~

~~our Chapter 11 Cases could adversely affect our relationships with our service providers and other third parties and our ability to retain employees, which~~HCS from Butler America, LLC (“Butler”) for approximately $24.0 million in turn could adversely affect our operations and financial condition. For a description of these and other risks, please see Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” As a result of these risks and uncertainties, the number of our outstanding shares and shareholders, assets, liabilities, officers and directors could be significantly different following the outcome of the Chapter 11 Cases, and the description of our operations, assets and plans included in this quarterly report may not accurately reflect our operations, assets and plans following the Chapter 11 process. The significant recent events surrounding the Bankruptcy Petitions raise significant doubts about our ability to continue as a going concern. If we cannot continue as a going concern, adjustments to the carrying values and classification of our assets and liabilities and our reported income and expenses could be required and could be material.

As discussed in Notes 1 and 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements and in the Liquidity and Capital Resources section of this MD&A, the Company did not make the quarterly Senior Notes interest payments due on March 30, June 30 and September 30, 2016, totaling $2.7 million. These interest payments were not made within 30 days after they became due and payable, and remain unpaid, such non-payment constituting events of default under the Indentures. As a result, the Senior Notes have been classified as current liabilities in the September 30, 2016 balance sheet. On May 9, 2016, the Company received a notice of acceleration with respect to the Series 1 Senior Notes and the Series 2 Senior Notes, declaring all principal and unpaid interest immediately due and payable. A similar acceleration notice was received on June 6, 2016 with respect to the Series 3 Senior Notes. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below for additional discussion regarding the implications of default and acceleration under the Senior Notes.

~~Corvisa Sale~~

~~On December 21, 2015, the Company entered into a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement~~cash (the ~~"Purchase Agreement") with ShoreTel, Inc. ("ShoreTel"~~“HCS Acquisition”), pursuant to ~~which ShoreTel agreed to purchase all~~the terms and conditions of a Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of February 1, 2017 (as amended, the ~~membership interests of Corvisa LLC ("Corvisa"~~“HCS Purchase Agreement”) ~~from Corvisa Services LLC,~~, by and among the Company, Novation Holding, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“NHI”), HCS and Butler. The purchase price is subject to adjustment as provided in the HCS Purchase Agreement.

Note Refinancing. On July 27, 2017, the Company entered into a Senior Secured Note Purchase Agreement, dated as of the same date (the “Note Purchase Agreement”), with NHI and HCS as guarantors (together with the Company, collectively, the “Credit Parties”), Taberna Preferred Funding I, Ltd. (“Taberna I”), Taberna Preferred Funding II, Ltd. (“Taberna II”) and Kodiak CDO I, Ltd. (“Kodiak” and, together with Taberna I and Taberna II, the “Noteholders”) and Wilmington Savings Fund Society, FSB, as collateral agent for the benefit of the Noteholders, to refinance $85,937,500 of principal indebtedness of the Company under the Company’s Series 1 Notes, Series 2 Notes and Series 3 Notes (collectively, the “2011 Notes”) held by the Noteholders, issued pursuant to three Indentures, each dated as of March 22, 2011. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, the Noteholders exchanged their 2011 Notes for new notes from the Company in the same aggregate principal amount (collectively, the “2017 Notes”) on the terms and conditions set forth therein. The unpaid principal amounts of the ~~Purchase Agreement. This transaction closed~~2017 Notes bear interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears until maturity on ~~January 6, 2016. Additional details~~March 30, 2033. The 2017 Notes generally rank senior in right of ~~this and related transactions are discussed in~~ ~~Note 4~~payment to any existing or future subordinated indebtedness of the Credit Parties. The Company may at any time upon 30 days’ notice to the ~~condensed consolidated financial statements.~~Noteholders redeem all or part of the 2017 Notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of the principal amount redeemed plus any accrued and unpaid interest thereon. Pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement, in connection with the Note Refinancing, the Company paid all overdue and unpaid accrued interest on the 2011 Notes in the agreed, reduced aggregate amount of $5,775,779, and paid $500,000 in fees and expenses incurred by the Noteholders.

~~Corporate Overview~~

~~Our Business~~

The Company is continuing its strategy of seeking to acquire operating businesses or making other investments that generate taxable earnings. As part of its efforts to identify acquisition or investment targets, the Company may nominate individuals to public company board of directors as a way to fully evaluate these potential targets. As of the date the financial statements included in this report the Company has not yet identified any specific acquisition targets.

~~The key performance measures for executive management are:~~

~~maintaining and/or generating adequate liquidity to sustain us~~Financial Highlights and ~~allow us to take advantage of acquisition opportunities, and~~

~~generating taxable income and long-term value for our shareholders.~~

Key Performance Metrics.The following key performance metrics (in thousands, except per share amounts) are derived from our consolidated financial statements for the periods presented and should be read in conjunction with the more detailed information therein and with the disclosure included in this report under the heading “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

~~Table 1 – Summary of Financial Highlights and Key Performance Metrics (dollars in thousands; except per share amounts)~~


	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015			March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Cash and cash equivalents	$	14,917	$	2,826		$	6,175		$	4,805
Marketable securities	18,190		18,897			34,980			36,488

	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,					For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016		2015			2017			2016
Net income (loss) available to common shareholders, per diluted share	$	0.01	$	(0.23	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)

Critical Accounting Policies

In our ~~2015~~2016 Form 10-K, we disclose critical accounting policies that require management to use significant judgment or that require significant estimates. Management regularly reviews the selection and application of our critical accounting policies. ~~Other than as discussed below and in Note 3 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, there~~There have been no updates to the critical accounting policies ~~contained~~included in the ~~2015~~2016 Form 10-K.

~~Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements that May Impact Our Financial Statements~~

On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, which amends the guidance in ASC 230 on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the statement of cash flows. The primary purpose of the ASU is to reduce the diversity in practice that has resulted from the lack of consistent principles on this topic. The ASU’s amendments add or clarify guidance on eight cash flow issues:

~~Debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs.~~

~~Settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing.~~

~~Contingent consideration payments made after a business combination.~~

~~Proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims.~~

~~Proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies.~~

~~Distributions received from equity method investees.~~

~~Beneficial interests in securitization transactions.~~

~~Separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle.~~

~~Applying judgment and estimating.~~

~~Managing the complexities of data collection, storage, and maintenance.~~

~~Enhancing information technology systems to ensure their ability to perform the calculations necessary for compliance with reporting requirements.~~

~~Refining internal controls and other business processes related to leases.~~

~~Determining whether debt covenants are likely to be affected and, if so, working with lenders to avoid violations; and~~

~~Addressing any income tax implications.~~

For the Company, the new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Management has not determined if this guidance will have a significant impact on its financial statements.

On January 5, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01 Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, which amends the guidance in U.S. GAAP on the classification and measurement of financial instruments. Although this ASU retains many current requirements, it significantly revises an entity’s accounting related to (1) the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and (2) the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. This ASU also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. For Novation, the new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. Management has not determined if this guidance will have a significant impact on its financial statements.

Results of Operations for the Three Month Period Ending March 31, 2017 as Compared to March 31, 2016

Interest Income – Mortgage Securities

Interest income on the mortgage securities decreased to approximately ~~$3.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $4.6 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Interest income on the mortgage securities was unchanged at $1.4~~$1.0 million during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016 and 2015.~~March 31, 2017 compared to $1.1 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Fluctuations in the interest income received from our mortgage portfolio are typically due to factors beyond the Company's control, such as the performance of the underlying loan collateral, prepayment speeds, interest rates, etc. The Company expects interest income and cash flow from its mortgage securities generally to decline as the principal on the underlying loan collateral is paid, written down, or written off. However, the Company may experience periods of increased interest income, given the volatile nature of the underlying loan performance.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist of salaries, office costs, legal and professional expenses and other customary costs of corporate administration. Because of the recent divestitures (see Note 43 to the condensed consolidated financial statements) and given that our operations have been significantly reduced, management has been able to significantly reduce the amount of general and administrative expenses. These expenses have declined consistently as the Company has reduced staff and office administrative costs and related items. The future amount of general and administrative expenses will depend largely on corporate activities, professional fees associated with those activities and staffing needs based on the evolving business ~~strategy. However, management expects these expenses to generally remain low~~strategy, and ~~to decrease for~~will increase significantly following the ~~foreseeable future.~~closing of the HCS Acquisition.

Other Income

~~During the first quarter of 2016, the~~The Company ~~used available cash to acquire various equity~~invests in liquid marketable securities, including equities, corporate bonds and ~~fixed income securities as part of its strategy to generate taxable earnings.~~traditional mortgage-backed securities. Other income ~~for the three~~includes interest, dividends and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016 consists primarily of the interest, dividend, and other income received~~realized gains from ~~these securities. Fluctuations in the income~~this investing activity. Income received from these securities ~~are generally beyond the Company's control. Other income was not material for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.~~

~~Interest Expense~~

~~As discussed in~~ ~~Note 7~~ ~~to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company discontinued accruing interest~~is dependent on the ~~Senior Notes as the notes are subject to the reorganization process. As a result, interest expense was $1.9~~amount of investments, coupons/yield and market fluctuations. The Company recognized other income of approximately $0.1 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and ~~$2.4~~$0.3 million for the same period in ~~2015. Similarly, interest expense was~~2016. Subsequent to the HCS Acquisition, the Company has significantly less available funds to invest. Therefore, for the foreseeable future, income related to investments is expected to be significantly lower ~~when comparing~~than has been demonstrated in 2016 and 2017 to date.

Reorganization items, net

The Company has incurred significant costs associated with our reorganization and the Chapter 11 proceedings. These costs

are being expensed as incurred. In addition, a non-cash charge to write-off the unamortized debt issuance costs related to

our 2011 Notes is included in “Reorganization items, net” as these debt instruments are expected to be impacted by the

bankruptcy reorganization process. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 reorganization items totaled $1.2 million and includes primarily professional fees. See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

These costs will significantly affect our results of operations for the second quarter of 2017. However, we expect these

costs to decline significantly beginning in the third quarter following resolution of our Chapter 11 proceedings.

Interest Expense

Interest expense is comprised primarily of interest on the 2011 Notes, which is variable based on 3-month LIBOR. Interest expense increased to $1.0 million for the three month ~~periods~~period ended ~~September 30, 2016 and 2015 at $0.2~~March 31, 2017 from $0.9 million ~~and $0.8 million, respectively.~~for the three month period ended March 31, 2016. The increase is a result of an increase in LIBOR.

Income Tax Expense

~~The income~~Income tax expense was not material for any period presented.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, the Company had approximately ~~$14.9~~$6.2 million in unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and ~~$0.2~~$0.4 million of restricted cash, portions of which are included in the other current assets and other assets line items on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. In addition, the Company held approximately ~~$18.2~~$35.0 million in marketable securities, which consist of ~~$0.8 million in corporate notes and bonds with a weighted average remaining maturity of 19 months as of September 30, 2016, $15.9~~$0.2 million of equity securities and ~~$1.5~~$9.0 million in mortgage securities, which contributed approximately ~~$3.7~~$1.0 million in cash flows during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. The Company's marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and are included in the current and non-current marketable securities line items on the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. For additional information regarding the Company's marketable securities, see the condensed consolidated statements of cash flow and Note 54 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~financial statements. The Company's ongoing contractual obligations consist primarily~~As of March 31, 2017, the ~~Senior~~2011 Notes ~~(as defined below) and obligations under its operating lease agreements.~~

~~The Company has outstanding three series of unsecured senior notes (collectively, the "Senior Notes") pursuant to three separate indentures (collectively, the "Indentures") with~~had an aggregate principal balance of $85.9 million. The ~~Senior~~2011 Notes were created through an exchange of the Company's previously outstanding junior subordinated notes that occurred prior to 2015. This exchange was considered a modification of a debt instrument for accounting purposes. Through the Bankruptcy Petition Date, the Company used the effective interest method to accrete from the principal balance as of the modification date to the carrying balance as of any reporting date. Under the effective interest method, significant changes in the rate at which a debt instrument accrues interest over its term can result in a recorded balance in excess of the aggregate principal balance of the debt instrument. As of the Bankruptcy Petition Date, the Company charged off the entire difference between the contractual principal amount of the 2011 Notes and their carrying value as these notes are expected to be impacted by the Company's bankruptcy reorganization process.

The 2011 Notes accrued interest at a rate of 1.0% per annum until January 1, 2016 and ~~since~~ then ~~have~~ accrued interest at a rate of three-month LIBOR plus 3.5% per ~~annum (the “Full Rate”).~~annum. Interest on the ~~Senior~~2011 Notes was payable on a quarterly basis and no principal payments were due until maturity on March 30, 2033.

The ~~Company's available cash and other liquid assets are not sufficient to meet the demands of the holders of the~~

~~Senior Notes. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. As discussed~~

~~in “Reorganization” above and in~~ ~~Note 2~~ to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company filed for reorganization under the Bankruptcy Code in the Bankruptcy Court. As discussed in Notes 1 and 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company did not make the quarterly interest payments due on March 30, ~~June 30, 2016, and September 30,~~ 2016 totaling ~~$2.7 million, as required under the Senior Notes and related Indentures.~~$0.9 million. These interest payments were not made within 30 days after they became due and payable, and remain unpaid, such non-payments constituting events of default under the Indentures. ~~The trustee under any Indenture or~~As a result, the ~~holders of not less than 25% of the aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Senior~~2011 Notes issued pursuant to such Indenture, by notice in writing to the Company (and to the trustee if given by the holders), may declare the principal amount of all the Senior Notes issued under such Indenture to be due and payable immediately.were classified as current liabilities. On May 9, 2016, the Company received a notice of acceleration with respect to the Series 1 ~~Senior~~ Notes and the Series 2 ~~Senior~~ Notes, declaring all principal and unpaid interest immediately due and payable. A similar acceleration notice was received on June 6, 2016 with respect to the Series 3 ~~Senior~~ Notes. ~~The~~

On the Bankruptcy Petition Date, the aggregate outstanding principal under the ~~Senior~~2011 Notes iswas $85.9 million and the aggregate recorded ~~unpaid~~ interest isliability was $2.0 million. ~~The~~As of March 31, 2017, the principal and recorded unpaid interest ($4.7 million) are classified as liabilities subject to compromise in the Company's ~~condensed~~ consolidated balance sheet.

The ~~Indentures contain certain restrictive~~unpaid principal amounts of the 2017 Notes bear interest at a variable rate equal to LIBOR plus 3.5% per annum, payable quarterly in arrears until maturity on March 30, 2033. The 2017 Notes generally rank senior in right of payment to any existing or future subordinated indebtedness of the Credit Parties. The Company may at any time upon 30 days’ notice to the Noteholders redeem all or part of the 2017 Notes at a redemption price equal to 101% of the principal amount redeemed plus any accrued and unpaid interest thereon.

The Note Purchase Agreement contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, ~~(the “Negative Covenants”) subject~~including but not limited to certain ~~exceptions in~~financial covenants. The Note Purchase Agreement also contains customary events of default, including but not limited to payment defaults, cross defaults with certain other indebtedness, breaches of covenants and bankruptcy events. In the ~~Indentures, including written consent~~case of an event of default, the Noteholders may, among other remedies, accelerate the payment of all obligations under the Note Purchase Agreement and the 2017 Notes.

In connection with the Note Purchase Agreement, on July 27, 2017, the Credit Parties entered into a Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of the ~~holders~~same date, pursuant to which each of the ~~Senior Notes. The Negative Covenants prohibit the Company and its subsidiaries, from among other things, incurring debt, permitting any~~Credit Parties granted a first priority lien ~~upon any~~generally covering all of its ~~property or~~ assets, ~~making any cash dividend or distribution or liquidation payment, acquiring shares~~other than accounts receivable and inventory, for the benefit of the ~~Company or its subsidiaries, making payment on debt securities of~~Noteholders, to secure the ~~Company that rank~~ ~~pari passu~~ ~~or junior to~~obligations under the ~~Senior Notes, or disposing of any equity interest in certain subsidiaries or all or substantially all~~of the assets of certain subsidiaries unless certain conditions are met. The Negative Covenants remain in effect until the Company satisfies certain financial covenants (the “Financial Covenants”). Satisfaction of the Financial Covenants requires the Company to demonstrate on a consolidated basis that (1) its Tangible Net Worth is equal to or greater than $40 million, and (2) either (a) the Interest Coverage Ratio is equal to or greater than 1.35x, or (b) the Leverage Ratio is not greater than 95% (each such term as defined in the Indentures). The Negative Covenants, as defined above, were in effect as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015. Compliance with the Financial Covenants is required only when the Company seeks to take action prohibited by the Negative Covenants that has not been approved by the holders of the Senior Notes.

~~With respect to the Company's recent divestiture activity, which is discussed further in~~ Note 4 ~~to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the sale of a subsidiary is not prohibited by the Negative Covenants provided that the sale is at fair market value~~Purchase Agreement and the ~~proceeds are reinvested in the Company. The Company was in compliance with all Negative Covenants as of September 30, 2016.~~

~~As discussed in~~ ~~Note 8~~ to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company is also the subject of various legal proceedings, the outcomes of which are uncertain. We may also face demands in the future that are unknown to us today related to our legacy lending and servicing operations.

Based on current projections, the Company believes its existing liquid assets, as described above, and the ongoing cash flows from its mortgage securities portfolio will be sufficient to meet normal operating cash needs, which exclude the demands of the holders of the Senior Notes discussed above.2017 Notes.

Overview of Cash Flow for the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017

The following table provides a summary of our operating, investing and financing cash flows as taken from our condensed consolidated statements of cash ~~flows for the~~ ~~nine months ended September 30, 2016~~ ~~and 2015.~~flows.

~~Table 3 –~~ Summary of Operating, Investing and Financing Cash Flows ~~(dollars in~~(in thousands)


	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,						For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2017		2016
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:
Cash used in operating activities	$	(947	)	$	(18,680	)
Cash provided by (used in) operating activities							$	583	$	(3,081	)
Cash flows provided by investing activities	12,882			17,707			765		4,516
Cash flows used in financing activities of continuing operations	—			(189		)

Cash flows used in financing activities							—		—

Operating Activities

The ~~decrease~~increase in net cash flows from operating activities to $0.6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017 from $3.1 million used in operating activities ~~to $0.9 million~~ during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~ ~~from~~ ~~18.3 million~~ ~~during the nine months ended September 30,~~March 31, 2016 was driven primarily by the ~~sale~~significant reduction of ~~Corvisa, which dramatically decreased~~general and administrative expenses and the ~~Company's net loss~~change in accounts payable and ~~operating cash requirements.~~accrued expenses.

Investing Activities

The decrease in the net cash flows provided by investing activities is due primarily to proceeds from the sale of Corvisa and an increase in proceeds from the sale or maturity of marketable securities, which was offset by an increase in purchases of marketable securities.

Financing Activities

~~Cash flows used in~~We did not have any financing activities ~~were not significant~~ for any period presented.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the federal securities laws, including this report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(d)) as of the end of the period covered by this report and, based on such evaluation, concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of such date.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is a party to various legal proceedings. Except as set forth below, these proceedings are of an ordinary and

routine nature.

On May 21, 2008, a purported class action case was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, by

the New Jersey Carpenters' Health Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated. Defendants in the case included

NovaStar Mortgage Funding Corporation (“NMFC”) and NovaStar Mortgage, Inc. ("NMI"), a wholly-owned ~~subsidiary~~subsidiaries of the

Company, and ~~its~~NMFC's individual directors, several securitization trusts sponsored by the Company (“affiliated defendants”) and