UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

	or

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the Transition Period from to

Commission File Number: 0-29174

LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Canton of Vaud, Switzerland

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation or organization)

None

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

Logitech International S.A.

Apples, Switzerland

c/o Logitech Inc.

6505 Kaiser Drive

Fremont, California 94555

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

(510) 795-8500

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o¨ No o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer x	Accelerated filer o¨
Non-accelerated filero (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)¨	Smaller reporting company o¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).Yes o¨ No x

As of ~~July 24,~~October 30, 2009, there were ~~180,265,278~~175,385,728 shares of the Registrant’s share capital outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		~~Page~~
Part I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	43

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2425

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	38 42

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	4044

Part II	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	4145

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	41 45

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	48 53

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	53

Item 6.	Exhibit Index	4955

Signatures		5056

Exhibits

In this document, unless otherwise indicated, references to the “Company” or “Logitech” are to Logitech International S.A., its consolidated subsidiaries and predecessor entities. Unless otherwise specified, all references to U.S. dollar, dollar or $ are to the United States dollar, the legal currency of the United States of America. All references to CHF are to the Swiss franc, the legal currency of Switzerland.

Logitech, the Logitech logo, and the Logitech products referred to herein are either the trademarks or the registered trademarks of Logitech. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

	Financial Statement Description	Page

•	Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008	43

•	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009	54

•	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008	65

•	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008	76

•	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	87

LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

Three months ended
June 30,
2009 2008
(Unaudited)
Net sales $ 326,110 $ 508,711
Cost of goods sold 248,288 335,139
Gross profit 77,822 173,572
Operating expenses:
Marketing and selling 58,938 77,280
Research and development 31,360 33,259
General and administrative 21,181 33,309
Restructuring charges 1,449 -
Total operating expenses 112,928 143,848
Operating income (loss) (35,106 ) 29,724
Interest income, net 592 2,552
Other income (expense), net 802 561
Income (loss) before income taxes (33,712 ) 32,837
Provision for income taxes 3,653 3,531
Net income (loss) $ (37,365 ) $ 29,306

Net income (loss) per share:
Basic $ (0.21 ) $ 0.16
Diluted $ (0.21 ) $ 0.16

Shares used to compute net income (loss) per share:
Basic 179,751 179,046
Diluted 179,751 184,692

	Three months ended						Six months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
	(Unaudited)

Net sales	$	498,093		$	664,707		$	824,203		$	1,173,418
Cost of goods sold		346,305			436,633			594,593			771,772
Gross profit		151,788			228,074			229,610			401,646
Operating expenses:
Marketing and selling		68,835			84,740			127,773			162,020
Research and development		31,825			33,351			63,185			66,610
General and administrative		23,739			29,620			44,920			62,929
Restructuring charges		45			-			1,494			-
Total operating expenses		124,444			147,711			237,372			291,559
Operating income (loss)		27,344			80,363			(7,762	)		110,087
Interest income, net		639			2,775			1,231			5,327
Other expense, net		(1,438	)		(853	)		(636	)		(292	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		26,545			82,285			(7,167	)		115,122
Provision for income taxes		5,802			9,974			9,455			13,505
Net income (loss)	$	20,743		$	72,311		$	(16,622	)	$	101,617

Net income (loss) per share:
Basic	$	0.12		$	0.41		$	(0.09	)	$	0.57
Diluted	$	0.11		$	0.39		$	(0.09	)	$	0.55

Shares used to compute net income (loss) per share:
Basic		178,395			178,630			179,058			178,835
Diluted		180,989			183,509			179,058			184,154

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)


		June 30,			March 31,				September 30,			March 31,
		2009			2009				2009			2009
		(Unaudited)							(Unaudited)
ASSETS	ASSETS							ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	567,417		$	492,759			$	524,844		$	492,759
Short-term investments			-			1,637				-			1,637
Accounts receivable			168,768			213,929				259,776			213,929
Inventories			235,509			233,467				239,904			233,467
Other current assets			54,054			56,884				60,104			56,884
Total current assets			1,025,748			998,676				1,084,628			998,676
Property, plant and equipment			101,203			104,132				97,664			104,132
Goodwill			242,874			242,909				243,108			242,909
Other intangible assets			29,776			32,109				27,505			32,109
Other assets			47,280			43,704				49,092			43,704
Total assets		$	1,446,881		$	1,421,530			$	1,501,997		$	1,421,530


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY	LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY							LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		$	204,497		$	157,798			$	291,661		$	157,798
Accrued liabilities			133,388			131,496				154,529			131,496
Total current liabilities			337,885			289,294				446,190			289,294
Other liabilities			137,773			134,528				142,370			134,528
Total liabilities			475,658			423,822				588,560			423,822

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders' equity:
Shares, par value CHF 0.25 - 191,606,620 issued and authorized
and 50,000,000 conditionally authorized at June 30, 2009 and
and 50,000,000 conditionally authorized at September 30, 2009 and
March 31, 2009			33,370			33,370				33,370			33,370
Additional paid-in capital			35,863			45,012				24,091			45,012
Less shares in treasury, at cost, 11,446,776 at June 30, 2009
Less shares in treasury, at cost, 16,281,115 at September 30, 2009
and 12,124,078 at March 31, 2009			(321,940	)		(341,454	)			(395,995	)		(341,454	)
Retained earnings			1,304,296			1,341,661				1,325,039			1,341,661
Accumulated other comprehensive loss			(80,366	)		(80,881	)			(73,068	)		(80,881	)
Total shareholders' equity			971,223			997,708				913,437			997,708
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity		$	1,446,881		$	1,421,530			$	1,501,997		$	1,421,530

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	Six months ended
	September 30,
	2009			2008
	(Unaudited)

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(16,622	)	$	101,617
Non-cash items included in net income (loss):
Depreciation		26,057			22,501
Amortization of other intangible assets		4,603			3,470
Share-based compensation expense related to options, RSUs and
purchase rights		11,166			11,710
Write-down of investments		-			979
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		(1,346	)		(6,032	)
Loss (gain) on cash surrender value of life insurance policies		(402	)		363
Deferred income taxes and other		(274	)		3,434
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(39,896	)		(99,553	)
Inventories		(1,011	)		(83,760	)
Other assets		(8,585	)		(13,611	)
Accounts payable		130,803			118,930
Accrued liabilities		28,407			23,359
Net cash provided by operating activities		132,900			83,407

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment		(18,144	)		(25,047	)
Proceeds from cash surrender of life insurance policies		813			-
Acquisitions and investments, net of cash acquired		(200	)		(31,832	)
Premiums paid on cash surrender value life insurance policies		-			(427	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(17,531	)		(57,306	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Purchases of treasury shares		(101,267	)		(76,017	)
Proceeds from sale of shares upon exercise of options and purchase rights		12,972			22,355
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		1,346			6,032
Net cash used in financing activities		(86,949	)		(47,630	)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		3,665			(5,592	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		32,085			(27,121	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		492,759			482,352
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	524,844		$	455,231

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~CASH FLOWS~~CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands)

(Unaudited)

Three months ended
June 30,
2009 2008
(Unaudited)
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss) $ (37,365 ) $ 29,306
Non-cash items included in net income (loss):
Depreciation 11,477 10,595
Amortization of other intangible assets 2,333 1,605
Share-based compensation expense related to options and purchase rights 5,409 5,888
Write-down of investments - 575
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation (288 ) (4,085 )
Loss on cash surrender value of life insurance policies 384 313
Deferred income taxes and other (568 ) (174 )
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 46,433 34,068
Inventories 317 (28,971 )
Other assets 1,142 (4,488 )
Accounts payable 45,066 12,820
Accrued liabilities 1,195 (13,845 )
Net cash provided by operating activities 75,535 43,607
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property, plant and equipment (7,702 ) (10,628 )
Premiums paid on cash surrender value life insurance policies - (55 )
Net cash used in investing activities (7,702 ) (10,683 )
Cash flows from financing activities:
Purchases of treasury shares - (49,017 )
Proceeds from sale of shares upon exercise of options and purchase rights 4,399 10,900
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation 288 4,085
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 4,687 (34,032 )
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 2,138 (224 )
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 74,658 (1,332 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 492,759 482,352
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 567,417 $ 481,020

																	Accumulated
					Additional												other
	Registered shares				paid-in			Treasury shares						Retained			comprehensive
	Shares		Amount		capital			Shares			Amount			earnings			loss			Total
March 31, 2008		191,606	$	33,370	$	49,821			12,431		$	(338,293	)	$	1,234,629		$	(19,483	)	$	960,044
Net income		-		-		-			-			-			101,617			-			101,617
Cumulative translation
adjustment		-		-		-			-			-			-			(13,772	)		(13,772	)
Minimum pension liability adjustment		-		-		-			-			-			-			148			148
Unrealized gain on investment		-		-		-			-			-			-			457			457
Total comprehensive income																					88,450
Tax benefit from exercise of
stock options		-		-		6,527			-			-			-			-			6,527
Purchase of treasury shares		-		-		-			2,603			(76,017	)		-			-			(76,017	)
Sale of shares upon exercise of
options and purchase rights		-		-		(18,375	)		(1,876	)		40,730			-			-			22,355
Share-based compensation expense
related to employee stock options
and stock purchase rights		-		-		11,824			-			-			-			-			11,824
September 30, 2008		191,606	$	33,370	$	49,797			13,158		$	(373,580	)	$	1,336,246		$	(32,650	)	$	1,013,183

March 31, 2009		191,606	$	33,370	$	45,012			12,124		$	(341,454	)	$	1,341,661		$	(80,881	)	$	997,708
Net loss		-		-		-			-			-			(16,622	)					(16,622	)
Cumulative translation
adjustment		-		-		-			-			-			-			12,046			12,046
Minimum pension liability adjustment		-		-		-			-			-			-			30			30
Net deferred hedging loss		-		-		-			-			-			-			(4,263	)		(4,263	)
Total comprehensive loss																					(8,809	)
Purchase of treasury shares		-		-		-			5,838			(101,267	)		-			-			(101,267	)
Tax benefit from exercise of
stock options		-		-		1,811			-			-			-			-			1,811
Sale of shares upon exercise of
options and purchase rights		-		-		(33,754	)		(1,681	)		46,726			-			-			12,972
Share-based compensation expense
related to employee stock options,
RSUs and stock purchase rights		-		-		11,022			-			-			-			-			11,022
September 30, 2009		191,606	$	33,370	$	24,091			16,281		$	(395,995	)	$	1,325,039		$	(73,068	)	$	913,437

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.

~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY~~

~~(In thousands)~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Accumulated
Additional other
Registered shares paid-in Treasury shares Retained comprehensive
Shares Amount capital Shares Amount earnings loss Total
March 31, 2008 191,606 $ 33,370 $ 49,821 12,431 $ (338,293 ) $ 1,234,629 $ (19,483 ) $ 960,044
Net income - - - - - 29,306 - 29,306
Cumulative translation adjustment
- - - - - - (1,382 ) (1,382 )
Minimum pension liability adjustment - - - - - - 104 104
Total comprehensive income 28,028
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
- - 2,331 - - - - 2,331
Purchase of treasury shares - - 1,552 (49,017 ) (49,017 )
Sale of shares upon exercise of options and purchase rights
- - (10,424 ) (1,059 ) 21,324 - - 10,900
Share-based compensation expense related to employee stock options and stock purchase rights
- - 5,826 - - - - 5,826
June 30, 2008 191,606 $ 33,370 $ 47,554 12,924 $ (365,986 ) $ 1,263,935 $ (20,761 ) $ 958,112

March 31, 2009 191,606 $ 33,370 $ 45,012 12,124 $ (341,454 ) $ 1,341,661 $ (80,881 ) $ 997,708
Net loss - - - - - (37,365 ) - (37,365 )
Cumulative translation adjustment - - - - - - 6,484 6,484
Minimum pension liability adjustment - - - - - - (441 ) (441 )
Net deferred hedging loss - - - - - - (5,528 ) (5,528 )
Total comprehensive loss (36,850 )
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options
- - 784 - - - - 784
Sale of shares upon exercise of options and purchase rights
- - (15,115 ) (677 ) 19,514 - - 4,399
Share-based compensation expense related to employee stock options, RSUs and stock purchase rights
- - 5,182 - - - - 5,182
June 30, 2009 191,606 $ 33,370 $ 35,863 11,447 $ (321,940 ) $ 1,304,296 $ (80,366 ) $ 971,223

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.~~

~~LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.~~

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Note 1 — The Company

Logitech International S.A. is a global leader in peripherals for personal computers and other digital platforms, developing and marketing innovative products in PC navigation, Internet communications, digital music, home-entertainment control, video security, interactive gaming and wireless devices. For the PC, the Company’s products include mice, trackballs, keyboards, gaming controllers, multimedia speakers, headsets, webcams and 3D control devices. For digital music devices, the Company’s products include speakers, headphones, earphones and custom in-ear monitors. For gaming consoles, the Company offers a range of controllers and other accessories. In addition, Logitech offers wireless music solutions for the home, advanced remote controls for home entertainment systems and PC-based video security systems for a home or small business. The Company generates revenues from sales of its products to a worldwide network of retail distributors and resellers and to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). The Company’s sales to its retail channels comprise the large majority of its revenues.

Logitech was founded in Switzerland in 1981, and Logitech International S.A. has been the parent holding company of Logitech since 1988. Logitech International S.A. is a Swiss holding company with its registered office in Apples, Switzerland, which conducts its business through subsidiaries in the Americas, Europe, Middle East, Africa (“EMEA”) and Asia Pacific. Shares of Logitech International S.A. are listed on both the Nasdaq Global Select Market, under the trading symbol LOGI, and the SIX Swiss Exchange, under the trading symbol LOGN.

Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Logitech and its subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and therefore do not include all the information required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. They should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009 included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Net loss for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 includes $2.2 million in pretax charges related to restructuring accruals, bonus accruals, and ~~revenue-related~~revenue related adjustments from fiscal year 2009. We reviewed the accounting errors utilizing SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 99, Materiality ~~(“SAB 99”)~~ and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108, Effects of Prior Year Misstatements on Current Year Financial Statements ~~(“SAB 108”)~~, and determined the impact of ~~the~~ errors to be immaterial to the current and prior quarterly and annual periods.

Certain prior year financial statement amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation with no impact on previously reported net income.

Subsequent events were evaluated through the time of filing this Form 10-Q with the SEC on ~~August 10,~~November 4, 2009 and are disclosed as applicable in the notes to the consolidated financial statements.

In the opinion of management, these financial statements include all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods presented. Operating results for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending March 31, 2010 or any future periods.

Fiscal Year

The Company’s fiscal year ends on March 31. Interim quarters are thirteen-week periods, each ending on a Friday. For purposes of presentation, the Company has indicated its quarterly periods as ending on the month end.

Changes in Significant Accounting Policies

There have been no substantial changes in our significant accounting policies during the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared with the significant accounting policies described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. Although these estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions that may impact the Company in the future, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~June~~October 2009, the ~~FASB issued Statement of~~ Financial Accounting Standards ~~No. 168,~~ ~~The~~Board (“FASB”) published FASB Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-14, Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements, to provide guidance for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. Under this guidance, tangible products containing software components and non-software components that function together to deliver the product’s essential functionality are excluded from the software revenue guidance in Accounting Standards Codification ~~and~~(“ASC”) Subtopic 985-605, Software-Revenue Recognition. In addition, hardware components of a tangible product containing software components are always excluded from the ~~Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles~~ (“SFAS 168”). SFAS 168 will become the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB as applicable to nongovernmental entities. On the effective date of this Statement, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. This statementsoftware revenue guidance. ASU 2009-14 is effective for ~~financial statements issued~~revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the appropriate timing for ~~interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. We will adopt this standard in~~ the ~~second quarter of fiscal year 2009. The~~ adoption of ~~SFAS 168 will not have an~~ASU 2009-14 and its potential impact on the Company’s ~~results of operations,~~consolidated financial ~~condition or cash flows.~~statements.

In October 2009, the FASB published ASU 2009-13, Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services separately rather than as a combined unit. This guidance amends the criteria in Subtopic 605-25, Revenue Recognition--Multiple-Element Arrangements, to establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable, based on vendor specific objective evidence, acceptable third party evidence, or estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, the disclosures required for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements are expanded. ASU 2009-13 is effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the appropriate timing for the adoption of ASU 2009-13 and its potential impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

Note 3 — Net Income (Loss) per Share

The computations of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share for the Company were as follows (in thousands except per share amounts):

						Three months ended				Six months ended
	Three months ended					September 30,				September 30,
	June 30,					2009		2008		2009			2008
	2009			2008
Net income (loss)	$	(37,365	)	$	29,306	$	20,743	$	72,311	$	(16,622	)	$	101,617
									.
Weighted average shares - basic		179,751			179,046		178,395		178,630		179,058			178,835
Effect of potentially dilutive stock options and stock purchase rights		-			5,646
Effect of potentially dilutive stock options
and stock purchase rights							2,594		4,879		-			5,319
Weighted average shares - diluted		179,751			184,692		180,989		183,509		179,058			184,154

Net income (loss) per share - basic	$	(0.21	)	$	0.16	$	0.12	$	0.41	$	(0.09	)	$	0.57
Net income (loss) per share - diluted	$	(0.21	)	$	0.16	$	0.11	$	0.39	$	(0.09	)	$	0.55

~~During the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, 11,504,963 and 4,420,950 share~~ Share equivalents attributable to outstanding stock options and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) of 9,961,610 and 4,997,925 for the three months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 and 4,635,060 for the six months ended September 30, 2008 were excluded from the calculation of diluted net income ~~(loss)~~ per share because the combined exercise price, average unamortized fair value and assumed tax benefits upon exercise of these options and RSUs were greater than the average market price of the Company’s shares, and therefore their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive. Potentially dilutive share equivalents were ~~also excluded from~~not considered in the computation of diluted net loss per share for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 because their inclusion in calculating a net loss per share would have been anti-dilutive.

Employee equity share options, non-vested shares and similar equity instruments granted by the Company are treated as potential shares in computing diluted net income per share. Diluted shares outstanding include the dilutive effect of in-the-money options which is calculated based on the average share price for each fiscal period using the treasury stock method. Under the treasury stock method, the amount that the employee must pay for exercising stock options, the amount of compensation cost for future service that the Company has not yet recognized, and the amount of tax impact that would be recorded in additional paid-in capital when the award becomes deductible are assumed to be used to repurchase shares.

Note 4 — Fair Value Measurements

The Company considers fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Company utilizes the following three-level fair value hierarchy to establish the priorities of the inputs used to measure fair value:

·	Level 1 – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 – Observable inputs other than quoted market prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

·	Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. This includes certain pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques that use significant unobservable inputs.

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, classified by the level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Cash and cash equivalents	$	567,417	$	-	$	-	$	524,844	$	-	$	-
Investment securities		-		-		1,637		-		-		1,637
Foreign exchange derivative assets		146						954		-		-
Total assets at fair value	$	567,563	$	-	$	1,637	$	525,798	$	-	$	1,637

Foreign exchange derivative liabilities	$	3,499	$	-	$	-	$	2,162	$	-	$	-
Total liabilities at fair value	$	3,499	$	-	$	-	$	2,162	$	-	$	-

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of March 31, 2009, classified by the level within the fair value hierarchy (in thousands):


	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Cash and cash equivalents	$	492,759	$	-	$	-
Investment securities		-		-		1,637
Foreign exchange derivative assets		208		-		-
Total assets at fair value	$	492,967	$	-	$	1,637
Foreign exchange derivative liabilities	$	1,849	$	-	$	-
Total liabilities at fair value	$	1,849	$	-	$	-

Notes 5 and 14 describe the inputs and valuation techniques used to determine fair value.

Note 5 — Cash and Cash Equivalents and Investment Securities

Cash and cash equivalents consist of bank demand deposits and time deposits. The time deposits have terms of less than 30 days. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost, which is equivalent to fair value.

The Company’s investment securities portfolio as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 consisted of auction rate securities collateralized by residential and commercial mortgages. The investment securities are classified as available-for-sale and are reported at estimated fair value. Auction rate securities generally have maturity dates greater than 10 years, with interest rates that typically reset through an auction every 28 days. All our ~~investments~~investment securities as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 have maturity dates in excess of 10 years. Since August 2007, auctions for these investments have failed. Consequently, the investments are not currently liquid and the Company will not be able to realize the proceeds, if any, from these investments until a future auction of these investments is successful or a buyer is found outside of the auction process. ~~During the three months ended June 30, 2009, management decided~~Management has determined that sale or realization of proceeds from the sale of these investment securities is not expected within the Company’s normal operating cycle of one year, and hence the investment securities were reclassified to non-current assets ~~effective~~as of June 30, 2009.

The fair value of our auction rate securities is determined by estimating the values of the underlying collateral using published mortgage indices or interest rate spreads for comparably-rated collateral and applying discounted cash flow or option pricing methods to the estimated collateral value. The mortgage indices and spreads are adjusted for factors such as the issuance date of the auction rate security and the rating of the underlying assets. In addition, inputs to the valuation methods include factors such as the timing and amount of cash flow streams, the default risk underlying the collateral, discount rates, and overall capital market liquidity. Such adjustments indicate the inputs fall within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents the change in fair value of the Company’s investment securities during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2009 and 2008:~~2009:

June 30,
2009 2008
Beginning balance $ 1,637 $ 3,940
Write-down of investments - (576 )
Ending balance $ 1,637 $ 3,364

Balance as of March 31, 2009	$	1,637
Unrealized loss		-
Balance as of June 30, 2009		1,637
Unrealized loss		-
Balance as of September 30, 2009	$	1,637

The par value of our investment securities portfolio at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 was $47.5 million. The write-down of investments recorded in other income (expense), net related to the other-than-temporary decline in the estimated fair value of these investments due to declines in the residential mortgage markets.

Note 6 — Balance Sheet Components

The following provides ~~a breakout~~the components of certain balance sheet ~~components~~amounts (in thousands):

	September 30,			March 31,
	2009			2009

Accounts receivable:
Accounts receivable	$	383,611		$	339,903
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(6,398	)		(6,705	)
Allowance for returns		(14,216	)		(25,470	)
Cooperative marketing arrangements		(50,267	)		(41,082	)
Customer incentive programs		(43,457	)		(40,369	)
Price protection		(9,497	)		(12,348	)
	$	259,776		$	213,929
Inventories:
Raw materials	$	36,747		$	30,959
Work-in-process		3			19
Finished goods		203,154			202,489
	$	239,904		$	233,467
Other current assets:
Tax and VAT refund receivables	$	21,956		$	17,275
Deferred taxes		22,855			25,546
Prepaid expenses and other		15,293			14,063
	$	60,104		$	56,884
Property, plant and equipment:
Plant and buildings	$	59,009		$	56,211
Equipment		113,305			108,779
Computer equipment		55,138			49,532
Computer software		64,055			60,259
		291,507			274,781
Less: accumulated depreciation		(210,027	)		(188,371	)
		81,480			86,410
Construction-in-progress		13,058			14,708
Land		3,126			3,014
	$	97,664		$	104,132
Other assets:
Deferred taxes	$	31,251		$	27,718
Cash surrender value of life insurance contracts		10,275			10,685
Investment securities		1,637			-
Deposits and other		5,929			5,301
	$	49,092		$	43,704
Accrued liabilities:
Accrued marketing expenses	$	25,940		$	21,984
Accrued personnel expenses		52,452			34,373
Income taxes payable - current		5,950			6,828
Accrued freight and duty		13,050			9,048
Accrued restructuring		423			3,794
Other accrued liabilities		56,714			55,469
	$	154,529		$	131,496
Long-term liabilities:
Income taxes payable - non-current	$	109,386		$	101,463
Obligation for management deferred compensation		9,788			10,499
Defined benefit pension plan liability		20,477			19,822
Other long-term liabilities		2,719			2,744
	$	142,370		$	134,528

June 30, March 31,
2009 2009
Accounts receivable:
Accounts receivable $ 278,894 $ 339,903
Allowance for doubtful accounts (5,957 ) (6,705 )
Allowance for returns (18,140 ) (25,470 )
Cooperative marketing arrangements (38,022 ) (41,082 )
Customer incentive programs (41,599 ) (40,369 )
Price protection (6,408 ) (12,348 )
$ 168,768 $ 213,929
Inventories:
Raw materials $ 29,116 $ 30,959
Work-in-process 26 19
Finished goods 206,367 202,489
$ 235,509 $ 233,467
Other current assets:
Tax and VAT refund receivables $ 17,743 $ 17,275
Deferred taxes 24,441 25,546
Prepaid expenses and other 11,870 14,063
$ 54,054 $ 56,884
Property, plant and equipment:
Plant and buildings $ 57,612 $ 56,211
Equipment 113,194 108,779
Computer equipment 53,596 49,532
Computer software 60,009 60,259
284,411 274,781
Less: accumulated depreciation (198,344 ) (188,371 )
86,067 86,410
Construction-in-progress 12,054 14,708
Land 3,082 3,014
$ 101,203 $ 104,132
Other assets:
Deferred taxes $ 29,686 $ 27,718
Cash surrender value of life insurance contracts 10,302 10,685
Investment securities 1,637 -
Deposits and other 5,655 5,301
$ 47,280 $ 43,704
Accrued liabilities:
Accrued marketing expenses $ 20,403 $ 21,984
Accrued personnel expenses 40,433 34,373
Income taxes payable - current 5,077 6,828
Accrued freight and duty 10,178 9,048
Accrued restructuring 1,081 3,794
Other accrued liabilities 56,216 55,469
$ 133,388 $ 131,496
Long-term liabilities:
Income taxes payable - non-current $ 104,901 $ 101,463
Obligation for management deferred compensation 9,383 10,499
Defined benefit pension plan liability 20,641 19,822
Other long-term liabilities 2,848 2,744
$ 137,773 $ 134,528

The following table presents the changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):

	September 30,
	2009			2008
Balance as of March 31, 2009	$	6,705		$	2,497
Bad debt expense		(1,194	)		821
Write-offs net of recoveries		446			(161	)
Balance as of June 30, 2009	$	5,957		$	3,157
Bad debt expense		599			20
Write-offs net of recoveries		(158	)		(369	)
Balance as of September 30, 2009	$	6,398		$	2,808

June 30,
2009 2008
Beginning balance $ 6,705 $ 2,497
Bad debt expense
(1,194 ) 821
Write-offs net of recoveries
446 (161 )
Ending balance $ 5,957 $ 3,157

Note 7 ~~—Other~~—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

The following table summarizes the activity in the Company’s goodwill account during the six months ended September 30, 2009 (in thousands):

Balance as of March 31, 2009	$	242,909
Additions		199
Balance as of September 30, 2009	$	243,108

Additions to goodwill represented an adjustment related to our acquisition of Ultimate Ears.

The Company’s acquired other intangible assets subject to amortization were as follows (in thousands):

															September 30, 2009							March 31, 2009
	June 30, 2009							March 31, 2009							Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying		Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying
	Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying		Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Net Carrying		Amount		Amortization			Amount		Amount		Amortization			Amount
	Amount		Amortization			Amount		Amount		Amortization			Amount
Trademark/tradename	$	24,434	$	(18,960	)	$	5,474	$	24,398	$	(18,559	)	$	5,839	$	24,472	$	(19,333	)	$	5,139	$	24,398	$	(18,559	)	$	5,839
Technology		49,268		(28,310	)		20,958		49,268		(26,598	)		22,670		49,267		(30,009	)		19,258		49,268		(26,598	)		22,670
Customer contracts		7,049		(3,705	)		3,344		7,018		(3,418	)		3,600		7,018		(3,910	)		3,108		7,018		(3,418	)		3,600
	$	80,751	$	(50,975	)	$	29,776	$	80,684	$	(48,575	)	$	32,109	$	80,757	$	(53,252	)	$	27,505	$	80,684	$	(48,575	)	$	32,109

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, changes in the gross carrying value of other intangible assets related to foreign currency translation adjustments.

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, amortization expense for other intangibles was $2.2 million and $1.9 million. For the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, amortization expense for other intangible assets was ~~$2.3~~$4.6 million and ~~$1.6~~$3.5 million. The Company expects that amortization expense for the ~~nine-month~~six-month period ending March 31, 2010 will be ~~$6.5~~$4.2 million, and annual amortization expense for fiscal years 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 will be $8.5 million, $7.6 million, ~~$5.0~~$5 million and $2.2 million.

Note 8 — Financing Arrangements

The Company had several uncommitted, unsecured bank lines of credit aggregating ~~$141.0~~$143.2 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2009. There are no financial covenants under these lines of credit with which the Company must comply. At ~~June~~September 30, 2009, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under these lines of credit.

Note 9 — Shareholders’ Equity

Share Repurchases

During the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company had the following approved share buyback program in place (in thousands):

Date of Announcement			Approved Buyback Amount			Expiration Date		Completion Date				Amount Remaining				Approved Buyback Amount			Expiration Date		Completion Date				Amount Remaining
June 2007	June 2007		$	250,000		June 2010			-			$	125,746			$	250,000		June 2010			-			$	24,985

In September 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a share buyback program which authorizes the Company to invest up to $250 million to purchase its own shares. The September 2008 program is subject to the approval of the Swiss Takeover Board and the completion of the current share buyback program of $250 million.

During the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company repurchased shares under its share buyback program as follows (in thousands):

		Three months ended June 30, (1)								Three months ended September 30, (1)								Six months ended September 30, (1)
		2009				2008
Date of Announcement		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
Date of										2009				2008				2009				2008
Announcement										Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount
June 2007	June 2007		-	$	-		1,552	$	49,017		5,838	$	101,267		1,051	$	27,000		5,838	$	101,267		2,603	$	76,017
			-	$	-		1,552	$	49,017

(1) Represents the amount in U.S. dollars, calculated based on exchange rates on the repurchase dates.

During the period from July 29, 2009 to August 6, 2009, the Company resumed the repurchase of its shares under the June 2007 share repurchase program and repurchased 2.3 million shares on the open market for $38.9 million, calculated based on exchange rates on the repurchase dates.

Note 10 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows (in thousands):


	September 30,			March 31,
	2009			2009
Cumulative translation adjustment	$	(54,353	)	$	(66,399	)
Pension liability adjustments, net of tax of $990 and $990		(15,092	)		(15,122	)
Unrealized gain on investment		424			424
Net deferred hedging gains (losses)		(4,047	)		216
	$	(73,068	)	$	(80,881	)

June 30, March 31,
2009 2009
Cumulative translation adjustment $ (59,915 ) $ (66,399 )
Pension liability adjustments, net of tax of $990 and $990 (15,563 ) (15,122 )
Unrealized gain on investments 424 424
Net deferred hedging gains (5,312 ) 216
$ (80,366 ) $ (80,881 )

Note 11 — Restructuring

In January 2009, Logitech initiated a restructuring plan (“2009 Restructuring Plan”) in order to reduce operating expenses and improve financial results in response to deteriorating global economic conditions. We completed a majority of the restructuring activity during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009. Restructuring activities primarily consisted of a reduction in salaried workforce, abandonment of projects, and facilities closures. All charges related to the 2009 Restructuring Plan are presented as restructuring charges in our consolidated statements of operations.

The following table summarizes restructuring related activities during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 (in thousands):

	Total			Termination Benefits			Contract Termination Costs			Other
Balance at March 31, 2009	$	3,794		$	3,779		$	15		$	-
Charges		1,449			1,366			83			-
Cash payments		(4,245	)		(4,220	)		(25	)		-
Other		(8	)		(4	)		(4	)		-
Foreign exchange		91			91			-			-
Balance at June 30, 2009	$	1,081		$	1,012		$	69		$	-
Charges		45			(22	)		9			58
Cash payments		(718	)		(698	)		(20	)		-
Other		(4	)		63			-			(67	)
Foreign exchange		19			19			-			-
Balance at September 30, 2009	$	423		$	374		$	58		$	(9	)

Total Termination Benefits Contract Termination Costs
Balance at March 31, 2009 $ 3,794 $ 3,779 $ 15
Charges 1,449 1,366 83
Cash payments (4,245 ) (4,220 ) (25 )
Other (8 ) (4 ) (4 )
Foreign exchange 91 91 -
Balance at June 30, 2009 $ 1,081 $ 1,012 $ 69

Termination benefits incurred pursuant to the 2009 Restructuring Plan are calculated based on regional benefit practices and local statutory requirements. Contract termination costs relate to exit costs associated with the closure of existing facilities.

The Company recorded a total of $22.0 million in restructuring charges in the period from January 1, 2009 to ~~June~~September 30, 2009, which included $17.8 million for termination benefits, $0.5 million for asset impairments, $0.3 million for contract termination costs and $3.4 million for other charges, primarily consisting of pension curtailment and settlement costs. In addition, we expect to record approximately ~~$2.0~~$0.6 million in contract termination costs during the remainder of fiscal year 2010. We expect to complete the restructuring in fiscal year 2010.

Note 12 — Employee Benefit Plans

Employee Share Purchase Plans and Stock Option Plans

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, the Company offers the 2006 Employee Share Purchase Plan (Non-U.S.) (“2006 ESPP”), the 1996 Employee Share Purchase Plan (U.S.) (“1996 ESPP”), and the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. Share-based awards granted to employees and directors include stock options, ~~performance~~ RSUs granted under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan and share purchase rights granted under the 2006 ESPP and 1996 ESPP. Shares issued to employees as a result of purchases or exercises under these plans are generally issued from shares held in treasury.

The following table summarizes the share-based compensation expense and related tax benefit included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands).

						Three months ended				Six months ended
						September 30,				September 30,
		Three months ended June 30,				2009		2008		2009		2008
		2009		2008
Cost of goods sold		$	798	$	731	$	628	$	669	$	1,426	$	1,400
Share-based compensation expense included in gross profit			798		731		628		669		1,426		1,400

Operating expenses:
Marketing and selling			1,759		1,849		2,154		1,989		3,913		3,838
Research and development			842		962		1,068		1,147		1,909		2,109
General and administrative			2,010		2,346		1,908		2,018		3,918		4,363
Share-based compensation expense included in
operating expenses			4,611		5,157
Share-based compensation expense included in operating expenses							5,130		5,154		9,740		10,310
Total share-based compensation expense related to employee	Total share-based compensation expense related to employee					Total share-based compensation expense related to employee
stock options, RSUs and employee stock purchases			5,409		5,888		5,758		5,823		11,166		11,710
Tax benefit			384		957		449		1,241		833		2,198
Share-based compensation expense related to employee stock						Share-based compensation expense related to employee stock
options, RSUs and employee stock purchases, net of tax		$	5,025	$	4,931	$	5,309	$	4,582	$	10,333	$	9,512

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, ~~$0.5~~$0.6 million and ~~$0.7~~$0.8 million of share-based compensation cost was capitalized to inventory. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, total compensation cost related to non-vested stock options not yet recognized was ~~$37.7~~$45 million, which is expected to be recognized over the next 3334 months on a weighted-average basis.

The fair value of employee stock options granted and shares purchased under the Company’s employee purchase plans was estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing valuation model applying the following assumptions and values:

													Three Months Ended September 30,												Six Months Ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended June 30,												Purchase Plans						Stock Option Plans						Purchase Plans						Stock Option Plans
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008
	Purchase Plans						Stock Option Plans
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%		0	%
Expected life	6 months			6 months			3.9 years			3.6 years			6 months			6 months			3.9 years			3.7 years			6 months			6 months			3.9 years			3.7 years
Expected volatility		78	%		49	%		46	%		34	%		71	%		41	%		48	%		35	%		71	%		45	%		48	%		34	%
Risk-free interest rate		0.31	%		2.80	%		1.60	%		2.00	%		0.21	%		1.96	%		2.18	%		2.97	%		0.21	%		2.38	%		2.13	%		2.31	%

The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and future expectations of dividend payouts. The Company has not paid dividends since 1996.

The expected option life represents the weighted-average period the stock options or purchase offerings are expected to remain outstanding. The expected life is based on historical settlement rates, which the Company believes are most representative of future exercise and post-vesting termination behaviors.

Expected share price volatility is based on historical volatility using daily prices over the term of past options or purchase offerings. The Company considers historical share price volatility as most representative of future stock option volatility. The risk-free interest rate assumptions are based upon the implied yield of U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues appropriate for the term of the Company’s stock options or purchase offerings.

The Company estimates forfeitures at the time of grant and revises those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company uses historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and records share-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.

The following table represents the weighted average grant-date fair values of options granted and the expected forfeiture rates:

	Three Months Ended June 30,													Three Months Ended September 30,												Six Months Ended September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008				Purchase Plans						Stock Option Plans						Purchase Plans						Stock Option Plans
	Purchase Plans						Stock Option Plans							2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008			2009			2008
Weighted average grant-date fair value of options granted	$	3.48		$	8.87		$	3.94		$	8.10
Expected forfeitures		0	%		0	%		10	%		7	%			0	%		0	%		10	%		7	%		0	%		0	%		10	%		7	%
Weighted average grant-date													Weighted average grant-date
fair value of options granted														$	4.20		$	7.01		$	14.10		$	7.39		$	4.20		$	7.94		$	13.87		$	7.87

A summary of activity under the stock option plans is as follows (in thousands, except per share data; exercise prices are weighted averages):

											Three Months ended September 30,										Six Months ended September 30,
	Three Months ended June 30,										2009					2008					2009					2008
	2009					2008					Number			Exercise Price		Number			Exercise Price		Number			Exercise Price		Number			Exercise Price
	Number			Exercise Price		Number			Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of period		18,897		$	18		17,952		$	17		17,751		$	18		17,033		$	18		18,897		$	18		17,952		$	17
Granted		189		$	11		307		$	29		2,200		$	14		146		$	25		2,389		$	14		452		$	28
Exercised		(669	)	$	7		(1,052	)	$	10		(365	)	$	9		(492	)	$	9		(1,034	)	$	7		(1,544	)	$	10
Cancelled or expired		(666	)	$	24		(175	)	$	23		(456	)	$	22		(101	)	$	26		(1,122	)	$	23		(276	)	$	24
Outstanding, end of period		17,751		$	18		17,032		$	18		19,130		$	18		16,586		$	18		19,130		$	18		16,584		$	18

Exercisable, end of period		10,524		$	15		9,732		$	12		10,029		$	15		10,357		$	12		10,029		$	15		10,357		$	12

The total pretax intrinsic value of options exercised during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 was ~~$4.8~~$3.1 million and ~~$21.4~~$ 7.8 million and the tax benefit realized for the tax deduction from options exercised during those periods was ~~$0.6~~$0.7 million and ~~$5.2~~$2.6 million. The total pretax intrinsic value of options exercised during the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was $7.9 million and $29.2 million and the tax benefit realized for the tax deduction from options exercised during those periods was $1.3 million and $7.8 million. The total fair value of options vested as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 was ~~$56.5~~$54.1 million and ~~$42.7~~$44.5 million.

During ~~fiscal year~~the three months ended September 30, 2009, the Company granted time-based RSUs to employees and board members pursuant to the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. The time-based RSUs vest ratably over service periods of four years for employees and one year for non-executive board members. The Company estimates the fair value of these RSUs based on the share market price on the date of grant. Compensation expense related to time-based RSUs is recognized over the vesting period and is included in the total share-based compensation expense disclosed above. As of September 30, 2009, total compensation cost related to time-based RSUs not yet recognized was $3.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over the next 45 months.

The Company has also granted performance RSUs to certain senior company executives pursuant to the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan. The RSUs vest at the end of two years from the grant date upon meeting certain share price performance criteria measured against market conditions. ~~The Company did not grant any RSUs during the three months ended June 30, 2009.~~

Compensation expense related to these RSUs is recognized over the two year ~~vesting~~performance period and is included in the total share-based compensation expense disclosed above. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, total compensation cost related to performance RSUs not yet recognized was ~~$1.5~~$3.0 million, which is expected to be recognized over the next 1521 months.

The fair value of performance RSUs granted was estimated using the Monte-Carlo simulation method applying the following assumptions:

~~Dividend yield~~		0	%
~~Expected life~~	~~2 years~~
~~Expected volatility~~		41	%
~~Risk-free interest rate~~		~~1.82~~	%

	FY 2009 Grants			FY 2010 Grants
Dividend yield		0	%		0	%
Expected life	2 years			2 years
Expected volatility		41	%		58	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.82	%		1.11	%

The dividend yield assumption is based on the Company’s history and future expectations of dividend payouts. The expected life of performance RSUs is the service period at the end of which the RSUs will ~~vest.~~vest if the minimum performance is achieved. The volatility assumption is based on the actual volatility of Logitech’s daily closing share price over a look-back period of two years. The risk free interest rate is derived from the yield on U.S. Treasury Bonds for a two year term.

Defined Contribution Plans

Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries have defined contribution employee benefit plans covering all or a portion of their employees. Contributions to these plans are discretionary for certain plans and are based on specified or statutory requirements for others. The charges to expense for these plans for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 were ~~$1.7~~$1.9 million and ~~$2.3~~$2.0 million and during the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were $3.5 million and $4.3 million.

Defined Benefit Plans

Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries sponsor defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of their employees. Retirement benefits are provided based on employees’ years of service and earnings, or in accordance with applicable employee benefit regulations. The Company’s practice is to fund amounts sufficient to meet the requirements set forth in the applicable employee benefit and tax regulations.

The net periodic benefit cost for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows (in thousands):

							Three months ended						Six months ended
	Three months ended						September 30,						September 30,
	June 30,						2009			2008			2009			2008
	2009			2008
Service cost	$	838		$	634		$	874		$	614		$	1,712		$	1,248
Interest cost		322			385			352			373			674			758
Expected return on plan assets		(266	)		(396	)		(320	)		(383	)		(586	)		(779	)
Amortization of net transition obligation		1			1			1			1			2			2
Amortization of net prior service cost		34			-			34			-			68			-
Recognized net actuarial loss		225			115			189			112			414			227
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1,154		$	739		$	1,130		$	717		$	2,284		$	1,456

Note 13 — Income Taxes

The Company is incorporated in Switzerland but operates in various countries with differing tax laws and rates. Further, a portion of the Company’s income before taxes and the provision for income taxes are generated outside of Switzerland. ~~In prior periods, Logitech’s~~Prior to the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company’s effective tax rate was calculated using an estimate of its annual pre-tax income. Due to the impact of the ~~recent~~ economic downturn, management has determined that a reliable estimate of its annual pre-tax income and related annual effective ~~income~~ tax rate cannot be made. Therefore, Logitech used the actual year-to-date effective income tax rate for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, the income tax provision was ~~$3.7~~$5.8 million and ~~$3.5~~$10.0 million based on effective income tax rates of ~~10.8%~~21.9% and 12.1%. For the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the income tax provision was $9.5 million and $13.5 million based on effective income tax rates of 131.9% of net loss and ~~10.8%~~11.7% of net income. The change in effective tax rates for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with the same periods in 2008 is primarily due to the mix of income and losses in the various tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits and related accrued interest and penalties due to uncertain tax positions was ~~$111.7~~$116.2 million and $108.2 million, of which ~~$89.5~~$91.9 million and $88.1 million would affect the effective tax rate if recognized.

The Company continues to recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions in income tax expense. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009, the Company had approximately ~~$11.1~~$11.6 million and $10.7 million of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions.

~~The provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 included a $0.4 million and $1.0 million tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense.~~

The change in effective tax rate from a tax expense of 10.8% of net income in the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to a tax expense of 10.8% of the net loss in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 is primarily due to the mix of income and losses in the various tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

~~On October 3, 2008,~~ ~~The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008~~, which contains the Tax Extenders and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008, was enacted into law by the U.S. Congress. Under the Act, the research tax credit was retroactively extended for amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2007 and before January 1, 2010. As a result, income tax expense for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 reflected a $0.2 million tax benefit for research tax credits.

On February 20, 2009, California budget legislation was enacted that will affect the methodology used by corporate taxpayers to apportion income to California. These changes will become effective for the Company's fiscal year ending March 31, 2012. The Company believes that these changes will not have a material impact on its results of operations or financial condition.

The Company files Swiss and foreign tax returns. For all these tax returns, the Company is generally not subject to tax examinations for years prior to 1999. In fiscal year 2009, the Internal Revenue Service initiated an examination of the Company’s U.S. subsidiary for fiscal year 2006. At this time it is not possible to estimate the potential impact that the examination may have on income tax expense.

Although timing of the resolution or closure on audits is highly uncertain, the Company does not believe it is reasonably possible that the unrecognized tax benefits would materially change in the next 12 months.

Note 14 — Derivative Financial Instruments – Foreign Exchange Hedging

Cash Flow Hedges

The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge against exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to its subsidiaries’ forecasted inventory purchases. The primary risk managed by using derivative instruments is the foreign currency exchange rate risk. The Company has designated these derivatives as cash flow hedges. These hedging contracts generally mature within six months. Gains and losses in the fair value of the effective portion of the hedges are deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged inventory purchases are sold, at which time the gains or losses are reclassified to cost of goods sold. The Company assesses the effectiveness of the hedges by comparing changes in the spot rate of the currency underlying the forward contract with changes in the spot rate of the currency in which the forecasted transaction will be consummated. If the underlying transaction being hedged fails to occur or if a portion of the hedge does not generate offsetting changes in the foreign currency exposure of forecasted inventory purchases, the Company immediately recognizes the gain or loss on the associated financial instrument in other income (expense). Such losses were immaterial during the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The notional amounts of foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding related to forecasted inventory purchases were ~~$54.7~~$60.5 million ~~(41.1~~(42.2 million euros) at ~~June~~September 30, 2009. There were no such contracts outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2008. The notional amount represents the future cash flows under contracts to purchase foreign currencies.

Other Derivatives

The Company also enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the short-term effects of foreign currency fluctuations on certain foreign currency receivables or payables. These forward contracts generally mature within one to three months. The Company may also enter into foreign exchange swap contracts to economically extend the terms of its foreign exchange forward contracts. The primary risk managed by using forward and swap contracts is the foreign currency exchange rate risk. The gains or losses on foreign exchange forward contracts are recognized in earnings based on the changes in fair value.

The notional amounts of foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 relating to foreign currency receivables or payables were ~~$10.7~~$19.3 million and ~~$9.3~~$15.0 million. Open forward contracts as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 consisted of contracts in British pounds and Canadian dollars to purchase euros and U.S. dollars at a future date at a pre-determined exchange rate. The notional amounts of foreign exchange swap contracts outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 were ~~$28.8~~$26.1 million and $19.1 million. Swap contracts outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 consisted of contracts in Mexican pesos, Japanese yen, Canadian dollars and British pounds.

The fair value of all our foreign exchange forward contracts and foreign exchange swap contracts is determined based on quoted foreign exchange forward rates. Quoted foreign exchange forward rates are observable inputs that are classified as Level 1 within the fair value hierarchy.

The following table presents the fair values of the Company’s derivative instruments and their locations on the Balance Sheet as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 (in thousands):

	Asset Derivatives			Liability Derivatives
	Location	Fair Value		Location	Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments:
Cash Flow Hedges	Other assets	$	-	Other liabilities	$	1,424
			-			1,424

Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments:
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts	Other assets		715	Other liabilities		-
Foreign Exchange Swap Contracts	Other assets		239	Other liabilities		738
			954			738
		$	954		$	2,162

Asset Derivatives Liability Derivatives
Location Fair Value Location Fair Value
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:

Cash Flow Hedges Other assets $ - Other liabilities $ 3,176
- 3,176

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts Other assets 45 Other liabilities 291
Foreign Exchange Swap Contracts Other assets 101 Other liabilities 32
146 323

$ 146 $ 3,499

The following table presents the amounts of gains and losses on the Company’s derivative instruments for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and their locations on its Financial Statements (in thousands):

	Net amount of gain (loss) deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss			Location of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income	Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income		Location of gain (loss) recognized in income immediately	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income immediately			Net amount of gain (loss) deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss		Location of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income	Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income			Location of gain (loss) recognized in income immediately	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income immediately

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments:
Cash Flow Hedges	$	(5,528	)	Cost of goods sold	$	1,430	Other income/expense	$	(31	)	$	1,264	Cost of goods sold	$	(3,373	)	Other income/expense	$	6
		(5,528	)			1,430			(31	)		1,264			(3,373	)			6

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments:
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts		-				-	Other income/expense		(246	)		-			-		Other income/expense		387
Foreign Exchange Swap Contracts		-				-	Other income/expense		69			-			-		Other income/expense		(669	)
		-				-			(177	)		-			-				(282	)
											$	1,264		$	(3,373	)		$	(276	)
	$	(5,528	)		$	1,430		$	(208	)

The following table presents the amounts of gains and losses on the Company’s derivative instruments for the six months ended September 30, 2009 and their locations on its Financial Statements (in thousands):

	Net amount of gain (loss) deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss			Location of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income	Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss into income			Location of gain (loss) recognized in income immediately	Amount of gain (loss) recognized in income immediately
Derivatives designated as hedging
instruments:
Cash Flow Hedges	$	(4,263	)	Cost of goods sold	$	(1,943	)	Other income/expense	$	(31	)
		(4,263	)			(1,943	)			(31	)

Derivatives not designated as hedging
instruments:
Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts		-				-		Other income/expense		(158	)
Foreign Exchange Swap Contracts		-				-		Other income/expense		(1,944	)
		-				-				(2,102	)
	$	(4,263	)		$	(1,943	)		$	(2,133	)

2021

Note 15 — Commitments and Contingencies

The Company leases facilities under operating leases, certain of which require it to pay property taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. Operating leases for facilities are generally renewable at the Company’s option and usually include escalation clauses linked to inflation. Total future minimum annual rentals under non-cancelable operating leases at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 amounted to ~~$60.4~~$49.0 million.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2009, fixed purchase commitments for capital expenditures amounted to ~~$9.5~~$9.9 million, and primarily related to commitments for manufacturing equipment, tooling, computer software and computer hardware. Also, the Company has commitments for inventory purchases made in the normal course of business to original design manufacturers, contract manufacturers and other suppliers. At ~~June~~September 30, 2009, fixed purchase commitments for inventory amounted to ~~$132.3~~$148.0 million, which are expected to be fulfilled by December 31, 2009. The Company also had other commitments totaling ~~$31.3~~$43.0 million for consulting services, marketing arrangements, advertising and other services. Although open purchase orders are considered enforceable and legally binding, the terms generally allow the Company the option to reschedule and adjust its requirements based on the business needs prior to delivery of goods or performance of services.

The Company has guaranteed the purchase obligations of some of its contract manufacturers and original design manufacturers to certain component suppliers. These guarantees generally have a term of one year and are automatically extended for one or more years as long as a liability exists. The amount of the purchase obligations of these manufacturers varies over time, and therefore the amounts subject to Logitech’s guarantees similarly vary. At ~~June~~September 30, 2009, ~~the amount of~~there were no outstanding guaranteed purchase ~~obligations was approximately $0.5 million.~~obligations. The maximum total potential future payments under ~~four~~three of the ~~five~~four guarantee arrangements is limited to ~~$32.8~~$30.8 million. The ~~fifth~~fourth guarantee is limited to purchases of specified components from the named supplier. The Company does not believe, based on historical experience and information currently available, that it is probable that any amounts will be required to be paid under these guarantee arrangements.

Logitech International S.A., the parent holding company, has guaranteed certain contingent liabilities of various subsidiaries related to specific transactions occurring in the normal course of business. The maximum amount of the guarantees was ~~$5.1~~$5.2 million as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, ~~$5.1~~$5.2 million was outstanding under these guarantees. The parent holding company has also guaranteed the purchases of one of its subsidiaries. The guarantee does not specify a maximum amount. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, there were no outstanding amounts under this guarantee.

Logitech indemnifies some of its suppliers and customers for losses arising from matters such as intellectual property rights and product safety defects, subject to certain restrictions. The scope of these indemnities varies, but in some instances, includes indemnification for damages and expenses, including reasonable attorneys’ fees. No amounts have been accrued for indemnification provisions at ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The Company does not believe, based on historical experience and information currently available, that it is probable that any amounts will be required to be paid under its indemnification arrangements.

In December 2006, the Company acquired Slim Devices, Inc., a privately held company specializing in network-based audio systems for digital music. The purchase agreement provides for a possible performance-based payment, payable in the first calendar quarter of 2010. The performance-based payment is based on net revenues from the sale of products and services in calendar year 2009 derived from Slim Devices’ technology. The maximum performance-based payment is $89.5 million, and no payment is due if the applicable net revenues total ~~$40~~$40.0 million or less. The total performance-based payment amount, if any, will be recorded in goodwill and will not be final until the end of calendar year 2009. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, no amounts were payable towards performance-based payments under our acquisition agreement.

In November 2007, the Company acquired WiLife, Inc., a privately held company that manufactures PC-based video cameras for self-monitoring a home or a small business. The purchase agreement provides for a possible performance-based payment, payable in the first calendar quarter of 2011. The performance-based payment is based on net revenues attributed to WiLife during calendar 2010. No payment is due if the applicable net revenues total ~~$40~~$40.0 million or less. The maximum performance-based payment is $64.0 million. The total performance-based payment amount, if any, will be recorded in goodwill and will not be known until the end of calendar year 2010.

The Company is involved in a number of lawsuits and claims relating to commercial matters that arise in the normal course of business. The Company believes these lawsuits and claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend against them. However, there can be no assurances that its defenses will be successful, or that any judgment or settlement in any of these lawsuits would not have a material adverse impact on the Company's business, financial condition and results of operations. The Company’s accruals for lawsuits and claims as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 were not material.

Note 16 — Segment Information

The Company operates in one operating segment, which is the design, manufacturing and marketing of personal peripherals for personal computers and other digital platforms. Geographic net sales information in the table below is based on the location of the selling entity. Long-lived assets, primarily fixed assets, are reported below based on the location of the asset.

Retail and OEM net sales to unaffiliated customers by geographic region were as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended				Six months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008
EMEA	$	229,394	$	309,815	$	354,547	$	512,878
Americas		177,526		233,818		297,941		436,767
Asia Pacific		91,173		121,074		171,715		223,773
Total net sales	$	498,093	$	664,707	$	824,203	$	1,173,418

Three months ended June 30,

2009 2008
EMEA $ 125,152 $ 203,063
Americas 120,415 202,948
Asia Pacific 80,543 102,700
Total net sales $ 326,110 $ 508,711

NoThe United States and Germany each represented more than 10% of the Company’s total consolidated net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2009, and no single country other than the United States represented more than 10% of the Company’s total consolidated net sales for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 or the three and six months ended September 30, 2008. One customer group represented ~~10%~~14% and 15% of net sales in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 and one customer group represented 13% and 15% of net sales in the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008.

Net sales by product family were as follows (in thousands):

					Three months ended				Six months ended
	Three months ended June 30,				September 30,				September 30,
	2009		2008		2009		2008		2009		2008
Retail - Pointing Devices	$	90,236	$	146,358	$	130,611	$	178,089	$	220,847	$	324,446
Retail - Keyboards & Desktops		58,009		94,955		79,906		111,073		137,915		206,029
Retail - Audio		72,120		83,218		121,001		116,812		193,121		200,030
Retail - Video		42,814		57,188		58,263		70,288		101,077		127,477
Retail - Gaming		17,149		30,510		28,493		39,030		45,642		69,539
Retail - Remotes		3,438		26,939		24,428		28,924		27,866		55,863
OEM		42,344		69,543		55,391		120,491		97,735		190,034
Total net sales	$	326,110	$	508,711	$	498,093	$	664,707	$	824,203	$	1,173,418

Long-lived assets by geographic region were as follows (in thousands):

	June 30,		March 31,		September 30,		March 31,
	2009		2009		2009		2009
EMEA	$	13,418	$	13,947	$	13,034	$	13,947
Americas		38,212		40,093		39,882		40,093
Asia Pacific		53,150		53,541		48,554		53,541
Total long-lived assets	$	104,780	$	107,581	$	101,470	$	107,581

Long-lived assets in China and the United States each represented more than 10% of the Company’s total consolidated long-lived assets at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009.

2324

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion in conjunction with the interim unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements include, among other things, statements regarding current or future general economic conditions, trends in consumer demand for our products, plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations, our current or future revenue mix, potential promotional actions, our competitive position, the impact of new product introductions and product innovation on future performance, the financial condition of our suppliers and customers, or our anticipated costs and expenses. Forward-looking statements also include, among others, those statements including the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes” and similar language. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause our results to differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those discussed in the section titled “Risk Factors” in Part II, Item 1A of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. You should carefully review the risks described in other documents we file from time to time with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including the Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Current Reports on Form 8-K that we file in fiscal year 2010 and our fiscal year 2009 Form 10-K, which was filed on June 1, 2009, which discuss our business in greater detail. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to the forward-looking statements or reflect events or circumstances after the date of this document.

Overview of Our Company

Logitech is a global leader in personal peripherals for computers and other digital platforms. We develop and market innovative products in PC navigation, Internet communications, digital music, home-entertainment control, video security, interactive gaming and wireless devices. Our products combine essential core technologies, continuing innovation, award-winning industrial design and excellent value.

For the PC, our products include mice, trackballs, keyboards, interactive gaming devices, multimedia speakers, headsets, webcams, 3D control devices and notebook stands. For digital music devices, our products include speakers, headphones, earphones, custom in-ear monitors and network music systems. For gaming consoles, we offer a range of gaming controllers, including racing wheels, wireless guitar and drum controllers, and microphones, as well as other accessories. In addition, we offer wireless music solutions for the home, advanced remote controls for home entertainment systems and PC-based video security systems for a home or small business.

We sell our products to a network of distributors and resellers (“retail”) and to original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”). Our worldwide retail network includes wholesale distributors, consumer electronics retailers, mass merchandisers, specialty electronics stores, computer and telecommunications stores, value-added resellers and online merchants. Our sales to our retail channels were ~~87%~~88% and ~~86%~~84% of our net sales for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008. The large majority of our revenues are derived from sales of our products for use by consumers.

Our markets are extremely competitive and characterized by short product life cycles, frequent new product introductions, rapidly changing technology, evolving customer demands, and aggressive promotional and pricing practices. We believe that the current global economic downturn has further increased competition in our markets, as competitors with larger financial resources, such as Microsoft, Sony and others, seek to gain market share by discounting prices or offering more favorable terms to customers, and competitors with smaller financial resources also discount prices or engage in other promotional practices in order to maintain their market share.

2425

We believe continued investment in product research and development is critical to driving the innovation required to strengthen our competitive advantage. We are committed to identifying and meeting current and future customer trends with new and improved product technologies, as well as leveraging the value of the Logitech brand from a competitive, channel partner and consumer experience perspective. We believe innovation and product quality are important to gaining market acceptance and maintaining market leadership.

The broadening of our product lines has been primarily organic, but we have also grown as a result of a limited number of acquisitions that expanded our business into new product categories. We continually evaluate our product offerings and our strategic direction in light of the current global economic weakness, changing consumer trends, and the evolving nature of the interface between the consumer and the digital world.

Summary of Financial Results

~~The global economic recession, which began to affect our financial results in the three months ended December 31, 2008, continued to have a negative impact on sales.~~ Our total net sales (retail and OEM) for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 decreased ~~36% to $326.1 million compared with total net sales of $508.7 million in the same period in the prior fiscal year, with retail sales declining 35%~~25% and OEM sales declining 39%. Retail units sold decreased 23% compared with the prior year, and OEM units sold decreased 33%. Retail sales in our Americas, Europe-Middle East-Africa (“EMEA”) and Asia Pacific regions declined 37%, 39% and 24% in the three months ended June 30, 200930% compared with the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008.

Retail sales ~~of all product lines~~ decreased ~~during~~26% in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared with the same period in the prior ~~fiscal year. Our gross margin for~~year, and were down 19% in the three months ended September 30, 2009. Although the global economic recession continues to affect our retail sales, the impact has lessened from the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2009, when retail sales declined ~~to 23.9%~~35% compared with ~~34.1%~~the same period in the prior fiscal year. Retail units sold in the three months and six months ended September 30, 2009 decreased 14% and 18% compared with the prior year.

OEM sales decreased 54% and 49% in the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with the same periods in the prior fiscal year. OEM units sold decreased 40% and 37% in the same ~~period~~periods. The substantial decline in OEM sales was related to console microphones, which sold well in the prior fiscal year, but have reached the latter stages of the typical gaming sales cycle in the current fiscal year.

Retail sales in our Europe-Middle East-Africa (“EMEA”), Americas and Asia Pacific regions decreased 30%, 21% and 25% in the six months ended September 30, 2009, and 24%, 5% and 28% in the three months ended September 30, 2009, compared with the three and six months ended September 30, 2008.

Our gross margins for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 were 30.5% and 27.9% compared with 34.3% and 34.2% in the same periods of the prior fiscal year. Net ~~loss~~income for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 was ~~$37.4~~$20.7 million, and net loss for the six months ended September 30, 2009 was $16.6 million, compared with net income of ~~$29.3~~$72.3 million and $101.6 million in the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008. ~~Net loss for the three months ended June 30, 2009 included the negative impact of $1.1 million~~The return to profitability in ~~additional costs, net of taxes, related to the restructuring plan initiated in January 2009.~~

As previously disclosed in the Form 12b-25 filed by the Company on August 6, 2009, we recently uncovered customer commitments made by sales associates in our Asia Pacific region. These commitments for customer program allowances were not accrued in our preliminary results of operations for the quarter ended June 30, 2009 which were announced on July 22, 2009. We conducted a review in order to determine the amounts to accrue related to these customer program allowances. We have completed our review and have made an adjustment to our preliminary results of operations announced on July 22, 2009 to reduce our net revenue for the quarter by $1.8 million and increase our cost of goods sold by $0.4 million. As a result, we are taking actions to reinforce our control measures for our sales representatives in our Asia Pacific region.

~~Trends in Our Business~~

Most of our revenue comes from sales to our retail channels, which resell to consumers and other retailers. As a result, our customers’ demand for our products depends in substantial part on trends in consumer confidence and consumer spending. Thus, as current and expected consumer demand declines, our net sales generally decline at a similar rate. However, we believe that consumer demand for our products during the past two quarters, as reflected in sell-through data, has not declined as much as may appear based on the decline in our net sales. This trend began in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009. In response to lower consumer demand and in some cases we believe combined with our customers' working capital constraints, many of our customers began to lower the inventory levels of our products that they maintain. To achieve these lower inventory levels, our customers purchased products from us at a lower rate than our products were sold through by our retailer customers to consumers and by our distributor customers to retailers, resulting in a greater impact on our net sales than the decline in consumer demand. However, sell-through data is subject to limitations due to collection methods and the third-party nature of the data, and thus may not be an entirely accurate indicator of actual consumer demand for our products. In addition, the customers supplying sell-through data vary by geographic region and from period to period, but typically represent a majority of our retail sales. We expect the trend of customer sales lower than sell-through to continue at least through the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 aswas primarily the result of the improvement in gross margin over the preceding fiscal quarter and our customers continue to reduce their inventory levels. We believe that once our customers’ inventory levels have been aligned with the current and expected consumer demand, our net sales to customers will more closely match sell-through.continuing cost reduction efforts.

2526

Trends in Our Business

We have a large and varied portfolio of product lines, grouped in several product families. Within and subject to the recent general trend of decreasing total sales ~~and profitability~~ caused by ~~deteriorating general~~the global economic ~~conditions,~~recession, we believe that normal increases or decreases in the retail sales level of a product family are dependent on the innovation we have designed into the product, customer acceptance of the product line, the popularity of the digital platforms the product line relates to, competitive activity in the product family, and the prices at which products are available. Historically, sales of individual product lines rise and fall over time, causing our overall product mix to shift both between and within product lines, and we expect these types of trends to continue under all economic conditions.

We have historically targeted peripherals for the PC platform, a market that is dynamically changing as a result of the declining popularity of desktop PCs and the increasing popularity of notebook PCs and mobile devices, such as netbooks, mobile phones and smaller form factor devices with computing or web surfing capabilities. In our retail channels, notebook PCs and mobile devices are sold by retailers without peripherals. We believe this creates opportunities to sell products to consumers to help make their devices more productive and comfortable. However, consumer acceptance and demand for peripherals for use with smaller form factor computing devices such as ~~netbooks~~notebook PCs and mobile devices is still uncertain. ~~In particular, the~~The increasing popularity of notebook PCs and mobile devices may result in a decreased demand by consumers for keyboards ~~desktops~~ and speakers, which could negatively affect our sales of these products. The increasing popularity of mobile devices has coincided with a steadily decreasing average sales price for computing devices, including for desktop and notebook PCs. As a result, there is a risk that the demand for those of our products that have a relatively high average sales price in relation to the price of a desktop or notebook PC will decline. We believe our future sales growth will be significantly affected by our ability to develop sales and innovations in our current products for notebook PCs and other mobile devices, as well as for emerging product categories which are not PC-dependent.

In ~~addition, in~~ our OEM channel, the shift away from desktop PCs has adversely affected our sales of OEM mice, which are sold with name-brand desktop PCs. Our OEM mice sales have historically made up the bulk of our OEM sales, and our OEM sales accounted for ~~15%~~12% and ~~13%~~16% of total revenues during ~~fiscal years~~the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008. We expect the trend of slowing OEM mice sales to continue. Our OEM sales were growing in fiscal year 2008 despite the decline in sales of mice due to our sales of microphones for use with particular game titles for gaming consoles. However, these sales ~~are tied to~~have declined as the ~~title distributor agreeing to distribute our microphone with their~~ game ~~and to~~titles have reached the ~~popularity~~latter stages of the ~~particular game title.~~typical gaming cycle. We believe future OEM sales growth depends on the development of new game titles or other products, consumers’ ~~gaming~~ purchase activity, and ~~the~~ manufacturers’ ~~decision~~decisions to combine our products with theirs, none of which is assured to occur.

Most of our revenue comes from sales to our retail channels, which resell to consumers and other retailers. As a result, our customers’ demand for our products depends in substantial part on trends in consumer confidence and consumer spending, as well as the levels of inventory which our customers choose to maintain. We use sell-through data, which represents the rate at which our products are sold through by our retailer customers to consumers and by our distributor customers to retailers, to indicate consumer demand for our products. However, sell-through data is subject to limitations due to collection methods and the third-party nature of the data, and thus may not be an entirely accurate indicator of actual consumer demand for our products. In addition, the customers supplying sell-through data vary by geographic region and from period to period, but typically represent a majority of our retail sales. In the last quarter of fiscal year 2009 and the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, our net sales declined faster than consumer demand as reflected in sell-through data, as our customers decreased their inventory levels by purchasing products from us at a lower rate than our products were sold through by our retailer customers to consumers and by our distributor customers to retailers. In the second quarter of fiscal year 2010, we believe most of our customers’ inventory levels have been substantially aligned with current and expected consumer demand in the EMEA and Americas regions. We anticipate alignment in the Asia Pacific region to be completed in the next fiscal quarter.

Although our financial results are reported in U.S. dollars, ~~nearly~~approximately half of our sales are made in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, such as the euro, British pound, Chinese renminbi and Japanese yen. Our product costs are primarily in U.S. dollars and Chinese renminbi. Our operating expenses are incurred in U.S. dollars, euros, Swiss francs, Taiwanese dollars, Chinese renminbi and, to a lesser extent, 25 other currencies. In previous years, our pricing strategy generally included, among other factors, raising or lowering selling prices in other currencies over time to avoid disparity with U.S. dollar prices and to respond to currency-driven competitive pricing actions. InTo the ~~current global economic downturn, our ability to manage local currency selling prices in response to changes in~~extent that the U.S. dollar ~~has been reduced because~~significantly increases or decreases in value relative to the currencies in which our sales and operating expenses are denominated, the reported dollar amounts of ~~weak consumer spending. We have chosen to prioritize sustaining~~our sales and ~~gaining market share in~~expenses may decrease or increase. In the six months ended September 30, 2009, the impact of foreign currency exchange rates on our ~~product lines, rather than managing short-term exchange rate fluctuations.~~results of operations was not material.

Our gross margins vary with the mix of products sold, competitive activity, product life cycle, new product introductions, unit volumes, commodity and supply chain costs, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations, geographic sales mix, and the complexity and functionality of new product introductions. Changes in consumer demand affect the need for us to undertake promotional efforts, such as cooperative marketing arrangements, customer incentive programs or price protection, which alters our product gross margins. Gross margins declined in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, compared with the same period in the prior fiscal year, due to product mix, increased promotional efforts in response to lower consumer demand and the effect on net sales of foreign currency rate fluctuations. Gross margin improved in the three months ended September 30, 2009 compared with the three months ended June 30, 2009, indicating decreasing promotional pressures.

Logitech is incorporated in Switzerland but operates in various countries with differing tax laws and rates. A portion of our income before taxes and the provision for income taxes are generated outside of Switzerland. Therefore, our effective tax rate depends on the amount of profits generated in each of the various tax jurisdictions in which we operate. For the six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the income tax provision was $9.5 million and $13.5 million based on effective income tax rates of 131.9% of net loss and 11.7% of net income. The change in effective tax rate ~~from a tax expense of 10.8% of net income in~~for the ~~first quarter of fiscal year~~six months ended September 30, 2009 ~~to a tax expense of 10.8% of the net loss in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010~~and 2008 is primarily due to the mix of income and losses in the various tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates. We expect future effective tax rates to fluctuate for similar reasons.

In the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, we implemented a restructuring plan which included a reduction in Logitech’s salaried workforce and other actions aimed at reducing operating expenses. We incurred $20.5 million in pre-tax restructuring charges in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 and ~~$1.4~~$1.5 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 related to employee termination costs, contract termination costs and other associated costs. We expect to incur an additional $2$0.6 million inor less related ~~charges~~to contract termination and associated costs in the ~~following~~remaining quarters of fiscal year 2010. The restructuring plan is expected to generate annual personnel cost savings beginning in fiscal year 2010 of $50 million, and approximately $50 million additional variable cost savings through efforts to limit production costs and operating expenses. The size and timing of future restructuring charges and cost savings are estimates subject to significant future economic, competitive and other uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that we will fully realize the anticipated future results. In the event that the current economic conditions significantly worsen, additional restructuring measures may be required in the future.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) requires the Company to make judgments, estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, net sales and expenses, and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

We consider an accounting estimate critical if it: (i) requires management to make judgments and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain; and (ii) is important to an understanding of Logitech’s financial condition and operating results.

We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Although these estimates are based on management’s best knowledge of current events and actions that may impact the Company in the future, actual results could differ from those estimates. Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these critical accounting estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors.

There have been no significant changes during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 to the nature of the critical accounting estimates disclosed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In October 2009, the FASB published ASU 2009-13, Multiple Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, which addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services separately rather than as a combined unit. This guidance amends the criteria in Subtopic 605-25, Revenue Recognition--Multiple-Element Arrangements, to establish a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of ~~operations,~~a deliverable, based on vendor specific objective evidence, acceptable third party evidence, or estimates. This guidance also eliminates the residual method of allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. In addition, the disclosures required for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements are expanded. ASU 2009-13 is effective for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the appropriate timing for the adoption of ASU 2009-13 and its potential impact on the Company’s consolidated financial ~~condition or cash flows.~~statements and disclosures.

Results of Operations

~~Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2008~~

Net Sales

Net sales by channel ~~and product family~~ for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in thousands):

Three Months Ended June 30,
2009 2008 Change %
Net sales by channel:
Retail $ 283,766 $ 439,168 (35 %)
OEM 42,344 69,543 (39 %)
    Total net sales
$ 326,110 $ 508,711 (36 %)

Net sales by product family:
    Retail - Pointing Devices
$ 90,236 $ 146,358 (38 %)
    Retail - Keyboards & Desktops
58,009 94,955 (39 %)
    Retail - Audio
72,120 83,218 (13 %)
    Retail - Video
42,814 57,188 (25 %)
    Retail - Gaming
17,149 30,510 (44 %)
    Retail - Remotes
3,438 26,939 (87 %)
    OEM
42,344 69,543 (39 %)
    Total net sales
$ 326,110 $ 508,711 (36 %)

	Three months ended September 30,							Six months ended September 30,
	2009		2008		Change %			2009		2008		Change %
Net sales by channel:
Retail	$	442,702	$	544,216		(19	%)	$	726,468	$	983,384		(26	%)
OEM		55,391		120,491		(54	%)		97,735		190,034		(49	%)
Total net sales	$	498,093	$	664,707		(25	%)	$	824,203	$	1,173,418		(30	%)

The decline in retail sales for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with 2008 was primarily due to consumers’ reluctance to spend, their buying preference for lower-price products and their strong response to promotions, as well as our customers’ alignment of inventory levels with consumer demand, all factors which are attributable to the global economic downturn. Retail units sold declined 14% and 18% in the three and six months ended September 30, 2009, reflecting consumers’ inclination towards Logitech’s value-priced products.

The significant decline in OEM sales for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with 2008 was attributable to the popularity of our console microphones in 2008, which in 2009 have reached the latter stages of the typical gaming sales cycle. The quarter over prior year quarter OEM sales decline is expected to continue in the three months ended December 31, 2009.

Approximately 51% and 52% of the Company’s total net sales were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar in the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with approximately 58% in both the three and six months ended September 30, 2008. If foreign currency exchange rates had been the same in the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, our total sales decline would have been 24% and 28% instead of 25% and 30%.

Retail Sales by Region

The following table presents the change in retail sales by region for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with the three and six months ended September 30, 2008.

	Three months ended			Six months ended
	September 30, 2009			September 30, 2008
Change in retail sales by region:
EMEA		(24	%)		(30	%)
Americas		(5	%)		(21	%)
Asia Pacific		(28	%)		(25	%)
Total net sales		(19	%)		(26	%)

For the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with 2008, the EMEA region experienced sales decreases in all product families, as the effects of the global economic downturn continued. Based on retail sell-through data for the three month period, we believe our EMEA channel partners were achieving improved alignment between their inventory levels and consumer demand. If foreign currency exchange rates had been the same in the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the EMEA region sales declines would have been 21% and 25%.

The Americas region had modest positive sales growth for the three months ended September 30, 2009 in the audio and remotes product families. For the six months ended September 30, 2009, retail sales in the Americas region declined over the prior year in all product families. Retail sell-through for the three month period in the Americas region reflected improved alignment of our channel partners’ inventory levels with consumer demand. Foreign currency exchange rates had no significant effect on retail sales in the Americas region.

Retail sales in the Asia Pacific region declined in all product families except audio during the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with the same period in the prior fiscal year. Sell-through data for the three month period in the Asia Pacific region indicated continued weakness in consumer demand and further efforts by our channel partners related to inventory management. If foreign currency exchange rates had been the same in the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008, the Asia Pacific region sales declines would have been 29% and 26%.

Net Sales by Product Family

Net sales by product family during the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,							Six months ended September 30,
	2009		2008		Change %			2009		2008		Change %
Net sales by product family:
Retail - Pointing Devices	$	130,611	$	178,089		(27	%)	$	220,847	$	324,446		(32	%)
Retail - Keyboards & Desktops		79,906		111,073		(28	%)		137,915		206,029		(33	%)
Retail - Audio		121,001		116,812		4	%		193,121		200,030		(3	%)
Retail - Video		58,263		70,288		(17	%)		101,077		127,477		(21	%)
Retail - Gaming		28,493		39,030		(27	%)		45,642		69,539		(34	%)
Retail - Remotes		24,428		28,924		(16	%)		27,866		55,863		(50	%)
OEM		55,391		120,491		(54	%)		97,735		190,034		(49	%)
Total net sales	$	498,093	$	664,707		(25	%)	$	824,203	$	1,173,418		(30	%)

Logitech’s Pointing Devices product family includes our mice, trackballs and other pointing devices. Keyboards and desktops (mouse and keyboard combined) include cordless and corded keyboards and desktops. Audio includes speakers and headset products for the PC, the home, and mobile entertainment platforms and wireless music systems. Our video product family is comprised of PC webcams and WiLife video security systems. Gaming includes console and PC gaming peripherals. The Remotes product family is comprised of our advanced remote controls. Net sales reflect accruals for product returns, cooperative marketing arrangements, customer incentive programs and price protection.

~~The decline~~Retail-Pointing Devices

Retail units of our pointing devices decreased 17% and 24% in ~~retail sales for~~ the ~~quarter~~three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared with the ~~quarter ended June 30, 2008 was primarily attributable to the global economic downturn, which resulted~~same periods in ~~consumers’ reluctance to spend, their buying preference for lower-price products, their strong response to aggressive promotions,~~2008. Sales of cordless mice decreased 26% and ~~our channel partners’ efforts to manage inventory levels in line with declining consumer demand. All product family~~30%, and units decreased 8% and 14%. Sales of corded mice decreased 31% and 35%, and units decreased 21% and 29%.

Retail-Keyboards and Desktops

Retail unit sales ~~declines described in the following paragraphs are a reflection~~ of ~~the impact of these factors. We also believe that sell-through of our products from our retailer customers to consumers~~keyboards and ~~from our distributor customers to retailers has not declined as much as our net sales to customers.~~

~~OEM sales declined as our popular console microphones reached the latter stages of the typical gaming sales cycle.~~

~~Approximately 46% of the Company’s total net sales were denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar~~desktops decreased 24% in the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 26% during the six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with ~~approximately 41% in the three months ended June 30, 2008. If foreign currency exchange rates had been~~ the same ~~in the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, our total sales decline would have been 33% instead of 36%.~~

~~Retail Pointing Devices.~~ ~~Retail sales of the Company’s pointing devices decreased 38% and units decreased 32% in the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared with the same period~~periods in the prior fiscal year. Sales of cordless mice decreased 36% while units decreased only 19%, reflecting consumer preference for the value segment of the product family. Our Nano mice, such as the V450 Nano Cordless Laser mouse, produced sales increases. Sales of corded mice decreased 41% and units decreased 39%.

~~Retail Keyboards and Desktops.~~ ~~Sales of keyboards and desktops decreased 39% and units decreased 28% during the quarter ended June 30, 2009 as compared with the same quarter last~~ year. Cordless keyboards and desktops sales declined ~~51%~~34% and 42%, with units decreasing ~~35%~~17% and 25%. Sales of corded keyboards and desktops decreased ~~24%~~23% and units decreased ~~28%.~~29% in both the three months and six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with the prior year.

Retail ~~Audio.~~Audio

Retail unit sales of our audio ~~sales decreased 13%~~products increased 9% in the three months and 7% in the six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with ~~a 6% increase in units. The declines of 27% in PC speaker sales and 16% in digital~~the prior fiscal year. Digital music speaker sales ~~during~~increased 47% in the three month period and 20% in the six month period, with units increasing 74% and 35%, based on the popularity of our Pure-Fi Anywhere speakers. PC headsets increased 14% in dollars and 13% in units in the quarter ~~ended June 30, 2009 were partially offset~~and 15% in dollars and units in the six months compared with the prior year, led by ~~a 16% increase in sales of our PC headset line. Sales of our~~the new G35 Surround Sound headset. Our Ultimate Ears line of in-ear monitors and earphones also made a positive contribution to ~~retail audio sales.~~sales in both the three and six month periods.

Retail ~~Video.~~Video

Video unit sales declined ~~25% while units went down 15% during~~5% and 9% in the ~~quarter~~three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared with the ~~same period in the~~ prior fiscal year. ~~Our value-priced QuickCam Connect for Skype and~~While products such as our Quickcam ~~Communicate webcams had positive sales increases over the prior year, while~~Pro 9000 sold well, our ~~much~~ higher-priced WiLife video monitoring products struggled in the current price-conscious market.

Retail ~~Gaming.~~ Retail sales of our gaming peripherals decreased 44% while units decreased 39% in the three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared with the same period in the prior fiscal year. Console gaming sales declined 70% withoutGaming

Without the support of new or growing game ~~titles.~~titles, retail unit sales of our gaming peripherals decreased 37% and 38% in the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with the same period in 2008. PC gaming sales decreased 24% and 23%, in the three and six months, with ~~lower~~units decreasing 35% and 34%. Console gaming sales ~~of all products.~~declined 57% and 40% in the same periods, with units decreasing 42% and 45%.

Retail ~~Remotes.~~Remotes

Retail remote unit sales ~~dropped 87%~~decreased 36% and ~~units declined 52% during~~43% in the ~~quarter~~three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared with 2008, reflecting consumers’ reluctance to purchase discretionary, premium-segment ~~products.~~

~~Retail Regional Performance.~~ ~~Sales in~~products, as well as our ~~EMEA, Americas and Asia Pacific regions decreased by 39%, 37% and 24%,~~customers’ alignment of inventory levels with ~~declines in all product families in all regions. The retail sales decreases were driven by the global economic downturn, as reflected in declining~~ consumer demand ~~a highly promotional environment, and our channel partners’ efforts to manage inventory levels in line with the declining demand. If foreign currency exchange rates had been the same~~.

OEM

OEM unit sales dropped 40% in the three months and 37% in the six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 ~~and~~compared with the same period in 2008, due to the ~~sales declines would have been 32%~~decline in ~~EMEA and 25% in Asia Pacific.~~

~~OEM.~~ ~~Sales of OEM products decreased 39% and units decreased 33%, as our~~ sales of ~~console~~our microphones, which have reached the latter stages of the typical gaming ~~product~~ sales cycle. ~~OEM mice sales decreased 22%, reflecting the market decline in PC sales.~~

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 was as follows (in thousands):

										Three months ended September 30,									Six months ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended June 30,									2009			2008			Change			2009			2008			Change
	2009			2008			Change %
Net sales	$	326,110		$	508,711			(36	%)	$	498,093		$	664,707			(25	%)	$	824,203		$	1,173,418			(30	%)
Cost of goods sold		248,288			335,139			(26	%)		346,305			436,633			(21	%)		594,593			771,772			(23	%)
Gross profit	$	77,822		$	173,572			(55	%)	$	151,788		$	228,074			(33	%)	$	229,610		$	401,646			(43	%)
Gross margin		23.9	%		34.1	%					30.5	%		34.3	%		(11	%)		27.9	%		34.2	%		(18	%)

Gross profit consists of net sales, less cost of goods sold which includes materials, direct labor and related overhead costs, costs of manufacturing facilities, costs of purchasing components from outside suppliers, distribution costs and write-down of inventories.

Gross profit declined ~~55%~~33% and 43% in the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared with the same period in the prior fiscal year. The ~~decline~~declines in gross margin ~~was~~for both the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 were primarily due to lower net sales, a shift in product mix ~~towards lower margin~~both between and within product categories, ~~increased promotional efforts to maintain demand and market share,~~ and the effect on net sales of the stronger U.S. dollar compared with the prior fiscal year. ~~Promotional efforts include contractual customer marketing and sales incentive programs, volume and consumer rebates and price protection programs, which impact our net sales and gross margin.~~

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and September 30, 2008 were as follows (in thousands):

										Three months ended September 30,									Six months ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended June 30,									2009			2008			Change			2009			2008			Change
	2009			2008			Change %
Marketing and selling	$	58,938		$	77,280			(24	%)	$	68,835		$	84,740			(19	%)	$	127,773		$	162,020			(21	%)
% of net sales		18	%		15	%					14	%		13	%					16	%		14	%
Research and development		31,360			33,259			(6	%)		31,825			33,351			(5	%)		63,185			66,610			(5	%)
% of net sales		10	%		7	%					6	%		5	%					8	%		6	%
General and administrative		21,181			33,309			(36	%)		23,739			29,620			(20	%)		44,920			62,929			(29	%)
% of net sales		6	%		7	%					5	%		4	%					5	%		5	%
Restructuring		1,449			-			-
Restructuring charges											45			-						1,494			-
% of net sales		0	%		0	%					0	%		0	%					0	%		0	%
Total operating expenses	$	112,928		$	143,848			(21	%)	$	124,444		$	147,711			(16	%)	$	237,372		$	291,559			(19	%)

Marketing and Selling

Marketing and selling expense consists of personnel and related overhead costs, corporate and product marketing, promotions, advertising, trade shows, customer and technical support and facilities costs.

Marketing and selling expenses decreased ~~24%~~19% and 21% in the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 ~~partly due to a 13% reduction in headcount~~ compared with the same period in the prior fiscal ~~year.~~year partly due to a 14% reduction in headcount. Travel expenses ~~advertising, marketing development funds and public relations expenses~~ also decreased, ~~compared with the prior year,~~ reflecting the reduction in headcount and cost management efforts. ~~Trade show~~Advertising expenses in the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 were lower due to a major ad campaign and brand initiative that occurred in the prior year. Marketing development funds, trade shows and consumer promotion expenses ~~were higher~~decreased in the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2008~~2009 compared with the ~~current~~prior year, ~~period,~~ due to the alignment of promotional expenditures with current sales levels and targeted product promotion activities which occurred in the prior year. If foreign currency exchange rates had been the same in the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, the decrease in marketing and selling expenses would have been ~~19%~~17% and 18% instead of ~~24%~~19% and 21%.

Research and Development

Research and development expense consists of personnel and related overhead costs, contractors and outside consultants, supplies and materials, equipment depreciation and facilities costs, all associated with the design and development of new products and enhancements of existing products.

The 6%5% reduction in research and development expense for both the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared with the same period in the prior year reflects ~~an 8%~~a 10% reduction in headcount combined with lower travel expenses as a result of our cost management efforts. The decline in research and development expense is smaller than the declines in marketing and selling or general and administrative due to our commitment to continued investment in product innovation. If foreign currency exchange rates had been the same in the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, the decrease in research and development expenses would have been 3% instead of 6%5%.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expense consists primarily of personnel and related overhead and facilities costs for the finance, information systems, executive, human resources and legal functions.

General and administrative expense declined ~~36% primarily due to the 30% reduction in headcount~~20% and 29% in the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 compared with the same period in the prior fiscal ~~year.~~year primarily due to the 28% reduction in headcount. Decreases in consulting, travel and ~~travel~~occupancy expenses resulting from lower headcount and cost management efforts also contributed to the decline. The decrease in general and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2009 would not have changed if foreign currency exchange rates had been the same as the three months ended September 30, 2008. If foreign currency exchange rates had been the same in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008, the decrease in general and administrative expenses would have been ~~35%~~28% instead of ~~36%~~29%.

Restructuring Charges

Restructuring charges consist of termination benefits, asset impairment charges, contract termination costs and other charges associated with the restructuring plan initiated in January 2009. We completed a majority of the restructuring activity during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, incurring costs of ~~$20.5 million.~~$22.0 million in the period from January 1, 2009 to September 30, 2009. We expect to complete the restructuring by the end of fiscal year 2010, and record approximately $0.6 million in additional contract termination costs.

The following table summarizes restructuring related activities during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 (in thousands):

	Total			Termination Benefits			Contract Termination Costs			Total			Termination Benefits			Contract Termination Costs			Other
Balance at March 31, 2009	$	3,794		$	3,779		$	15		$	3,794		$	3,779		$	15		$	-
Charges		1,449			1,366			83			1,449			1,366			83			-
Cash payments		(4,245	)		(4,220	)		(25	)		(4,245	)		(4,220	)		(25	)		-
Other		(8	)		(4	)		(4	)		(8	)		(4	)		(4	)		-
Foreign exchange		91			91			-			91			91			-			-
Balance at June 30, 2009	$	1,081		$	1,012		$	69		$	1,081		$	1,012		$	69		$	-
Charges											45			(22	)		9			58
Cash payments											(718	)		(698	)		(20	)		-
Other											(4	)		63			-			(67	)
Foreign exchange											19			19			-			-
Balance at September 30, 2009										$	423		$	374		$	58		$	(9	)

~~We expect to record approximately $2.0 million in contract termination costs during the remainder of fiscal year 2010. We expect to complete the restructuring in fiscal year 2010.~~

Interest Income, Net

Interest income and expense for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in thousands):

										Three months ended September 30,									Six months ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended June 30,									2009			2008			Change			2009			2008			Change
	2009			2008			Change %
Interest income	$	594		$	2,680			(78	%)	$	650		$	2,777			(77	%)	$	1,244		$	5,457			(77	%)
Interest expense		(2	)		(128	)		98	%		(11	)		(2	)		(450	%)		(13	)		(130	)		90	%
Interest income, net	$	592		$	2,552			(77	%)	$	639		$	2,775			(77	%)	$	1,231		$	5,327			(77	%)

Interest income was lower for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 despite higher invested balances due to significantly lower interest rates compared with the prior year.

3134

Other ~~Income,~~Expense, Net

Other income and expense for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,									Three months ended September 30,									Six months ended September 30,
	2009			2008			Change %			2009			2008			Change			2009			2008			Change
Foreign currency exchange gains, net	$	1,138		$	1,391			(18	%)

Foreign currency exchange gains
(losses), net										$	(2,275	)	$	(220	)		934	%	$	(1,138	)	$	1,171			(197	%)
Insurance investment income (loss)											786			(50	)		(1672	%)		404			(365	)		(211	%)
Write-down of investments		-			(575	)		(100	%)		-			(403	)		(100	%)		-			(978	)		(100	%)
Other, net		(336	)		(255	)		32	%		51			(180	)		(128	%)		98			(120	)		(181	%)
Other income, net	$	802		$	561			43	%
Other expense, net										$	(1,438	)	$	(853	)		69	%	$	(636	)	$	(292	)		117	%

The ~~decline~~increase in foreign currency exchange ~~gains~~losses in the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 resulted ~~primarily~~ from higher losses experienced on ~~foreign exchange forward and swap~~balances denominated in currencies other than the functional currency of a particular subsidiary.

Insurance investment income or loss represents changes in the cash surrender value of Company-owned life insurance contracts ~~which are intended~~related to ~~reduce~~a management deferred compensation plan offered by one of the ~~short-term effects of foreign currency fluctuations on foreign currency receivables or payables.~~Company’s subsidiaries.

During the ~~quarter~~three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008, we recorded an unrealized ~~loss~~losses of ~~$0.6~~$0.4 million and $1.0 million related to an other-than-temporary ~~decline~~declines in the estimated fair value of our ~~short-term investments.~~auction-rate investment securities.

Provision for Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes and effective tax rates for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in thousands):

							Three months ended September 30,									Six months ended September 30,
	Three Months Ended June 30,						2009			2008			Change			2009			2008			Change
	2009			2008
Provision for income taxes	$	3,653		$	3,531		$	5,802		$	9,974			(42	%)	$	9,455		$	13,505			(30	%)
Effective income tax rate		(10.8	%)		10.8	%		21.9	%		12.1	%					(131.9	%)		11.7	%

The provision for income taxes consists of income and withholding taxes. Logitech operates in multiple jurisdictions and its profits are taxed pursuant to tax laws of these jurisdictions. The Company’s effective income tax rate may be affected by changes in tax laws or interpretations of tax laws in any given jurisdiction, utilization of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, changes in geographical mix of income and expense, and changes in management’s assessment of matters such as the ability to realize deferred tax assets.

~~In prior periods, our~~Prior to the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company’s effective tax rate was calculated using an estimate of ~~our~~its annual pre-tax income. Due to the impact of the economic downturn, management has determined that a reliable estimate of ~~our~~its annual pre-tax income and related annual effective tax rate cannot be made. Therefore, ~~we have~~Logitech used the actual year-to-date effective income tax rate for the three and six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009.

~~On October 3, 2008,~~ ~~The Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008, which contains the~~ ~~Tax Extenders and Alternative Minimum Tax Relief Act of 2008~~, was enacted into law by the U.S. Congress. Under the Act, the research tax credit was retroactively extended for amounts paid or incurred after December 31, 2007 and before January 1, 2010. As a result, income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 reflected a tax benefit of $0.2 million related to research tax credits.

~~The provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 included a $0.4 million and $1.0 million tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense.~~

The change in effective tax ~~rate from a tax expense of 10.8% of net income~~rates for the three and six months ended September 30, 2009 compared with the same periods in ~~the first quarter of fiscal year 2009 to a tax expense of 10.8% of the net loss in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010~~2008 is primarily due to the mix of income and losses in the various tax jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Balances, Available Borrowings, and Capital Resources

At ~~June~~September 30, 2009, net working capital was ~~$687.9~~$638.4 million, compared with $709.4 million at March 31, 2009. Although cash balances increased ~~substantially~~ over March 31, 2009, working capital decreased due to ~~lower accounts receivable, reflecting lower net sales in the three months ended June 30, 2009, and~~ higher accounts payable, as production ~~increases~~increased in preparation for ~~new product launches in the second quarter, as well as~~ the holiday selling season.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, operating activities generated cash of ~~$75.5~~$132.9 million. Our largest sources of operating cash flows were ~~cash collections from our customers and~~ increased accounts ~~payable.~~payable and accrued liabilities. We invested ~~$7.7~~$18.1 million during the ~~quarter~~six months ended September 30, 2009 in capital expenditures for tooling costs, computer hardware, and software. Net cash ~~provided by~~used in financing activities was ~~$4.7~~$86.9 million, primarily due to the purchase of treasury stock, offset in part by proceeds from employee stock purchases and the exercise of stock ~~options and employee stock purchases.~~options.

At ~~June~~September 30, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of ~~$567.4~~$524.8 million and investment securities of $1.6 million. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost, which is equivalent to fair value. Investment securities are carried at fair value, determined by estimating the value of the underlying collateral using published mortgage indices or interest rate spreads for comparably rated collateral and applying discounted cash flow or option pricing methods to the estimated value. The Company considers the inputs used to measure the fair value of its investment securities as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, Logitech’s management decided that sale or realization of proceeds from the sale of these investment securities is not expected within the Company’s normal operating cycle of one year, and hence the securities were reclassified from short-term investments to non-current assets. Further changes in the fair value of these investment securities would not materially affect the Company’s liquidity or capital resources.

The Company has credit lines with several European and Asian banks totaling ~~$141.0~~$143.2 million as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009. As is common for businesses in European and Asian countries, these credit lines are uncommitted and unsecured. Despite the lack of formal commitments from the banks, we believe that these lines of credit will continue to be made available because of our long-standing relationships with these banks. At ~~June~~September 30, 2009, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under these lines of credit. There are no financial covenants under these lines of credit with which the Company must comply.

The Company has financed its operating and capital requirements primarily through cash flow from operations and, to a lesser extent, from capital markets and bank borrowings. The Company’s normal short-term liquidity and long-term capital resource requirements are provided from three sources: cash flow generated from operations, cash and cash equivalents on hand, and borrowings, as needed, under our credit facilities.

Based upon our available cash balances and credit lines, and the trend of our historical cash flow generation, we believe we have sufficient liquidity to fund operations for the foreseeable future.

Cash Flow from Operating Activities

The following table presents selected financial information and statistics as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,						September 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Accounts receivable, net	$	168,768		$	338,493		$	259,776		$	467,499
Inventories		235,509			274,460			239,904			323,673
Working capital		687,863			722,301			638,438			744,976
Days sales in accounts receivable (DSO) (1)	47 days			60 days			47 days			63 days
Inventory turnover (ITO) (2)		4.2	x		4.9	x		5.8	x		5.4	x
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	75,535		$	43,607		$	132,900		$	83,407

(1)	DSO is determined using ending accounts receivable as of the most recent quarter-end and net sales for the most recent quarter.

(2)	ITO is determined using ending inventories and annualized cost of goods sold (based on the most recent quarterly cost of goods sold).

Net cash provided by operating activities increased to ~~$75.5~~$132.9 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, from ~~$43.6~~$83.4 million for the same period in the prior year. The increased cash flow resulted from ~~higher collections from our customers,~~ lower inventory levels and increased accounts payable.

DSO for the ~~quarter~~three months ended September 30, 2009 was 1316 days lower than the same period in the prior year, primarily due to lower sales levels resulting from the economic downturn. Typical payment terms require customers to pay for product sales generally within 30 to 60 days. However, terms may vary by customer type, by country and by selling season. Extended payment terms are sometimes offered to a limited number of customers during the second and third fiscal quarters. The Company does not modify payment terms on existing receivables, but may offer discounts for early payment.

Inventory turns for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 ~~were slightly lower than in~~improved over the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2008, as we reduced inventory levels in line with the weak demand environment and our channel partners’ efforts to reduce their inventory.

Cash Flow from Investing Activities

Cash flows from investing activities during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 were as follows (in thousands):

	Six months ended September 30,
	2009			2008
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	$	(18,144	)	$	(25,047	)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired		(200	)		(31,832	)
Proceeds from cash surrender of life insurance policies		813			-
Premiums paid on cash surrender value life insurance policies		-			(427	)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(17,531	)	$	(57,306	)

Three months ended June 30,
2009 2008
Purchases of property, plant and equipment $ (7,702 ) $ (10,628 )
Premiums paid on cash surrender value life insurance policies - (55 )
Net cash used in investing activities
$ (7,702 ) $ (10,683 )

Our capital expenditures during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 were principally for computer hardware and software purchases ~~machinery and equipment,~~ and normal expenditures for tooling. Purchasing activity was lower in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, as we focused our cash outlays on critical capital needs.

In the six months ended September 30, 2008, we acquired the Ultimate Ears companies for $31.8 million.

Cash Flow from Financing Activities

The following tables present information on our cash flows from financing activities, including information on our share repurchases during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands except per share amounts):


	Six months ended September 30,
	2009			2008
Purchases of treasury shares	$	(101,267	)	$	(76,017	)
Proceeds from sale of shares upon exercise of options and purchase rights		12,972			22,355
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		1,346			6,032
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(86,949	)	$	(47,630	)

	Six months ended September 30,
		2009			2008
Number of shares repurchased		5,838			2,603
Value of shares repurchased	$	101,267		$	76,017
Average price per share	$	17.35		$	29.20

Three months ended June 30,
2009 2008
Purchases of treasury shares $ - $ (49,017 )
Proceeds from sale of shares upon exercise of options and purchase rights 4,399 10,900
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation 288 4,085
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
$ 4,687 $ (34,032 )

Three months ended June 30,

2009

2008

Number of shares repurchased - 1,552
Value of shares repurchased $ - $ 49,017
Average price per share $ - $ 31.58

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, ~~cash of $4.4~~we repurchased 5.8 million ~~was provided by~~shares for $101.3 million under the Company’s June 2007 buyback program. The sale of shares upon exercise of options and purchase rights pursuant to the Company’s stock ~~plans.~~plans realized $13.0 million. Tax benefits recognized on the exercise of share-based payment awards provided ~~$0.3~~$1.3 million. ~~No share repurchases were made in~~

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June 30, 2009, in order to maximize our cash position in light of the current economic environment.~~

~~During the three months ended June~~September 30, 2008, we repurchased ~~1.6~~2.6 million shares for ~~$49.0~~$76.0 million under our June 2007 buyback program. The sale of shares upon exercise of options realized ~~$10.9~~$22.4 million. In addition, cash of ~~$4.1~~$6.0 million was provided by tax benefits recognized on the exercise of share-based payment awards.

Cash Outlook

We have financed our operations and capital requirements primarily through cash flow from operations and, to a lesser extent, capital markets and bank borrowings. Our working capital requirements and capital expenditures may increase to support future expansion of Logitech operations. Future acquisitions or expansion of our operations may be significant and may require the use of cash. In addition, continued deterioration of global economic conditions could adversely affect our operations and may also require the use of cash.

In June 2007, we announced the approval by our Board of Directors of a share buyback program authorizing the repurchase of up to $250 million of our shares. The approved amount remaining under the June 2007 program at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 was ~~$125.7~~$25 million. The program expires in June 2010. We lowered our share repurchase activity beginning in the second half of fiscal year 2009 in order to maximize our cash position. ~~During the period from~~Beginning July 29, ~~2009 to August 6,~~ 2009, the Company resumed the repurchase of its shares under the June 2007 share repurchase program and repurchased ~~2.3~~5.8 million shares on the open market for ~~$38.9~~$101.3 million, calculated based on exchange rates on the repurchase dates.

In September 2008, our Board of Directors approved a new share buyback program, which authorizes the Company to invest up to $250 million to purchase its own shares. The September 2008 program is subject to the approval of the Swiss Takeover Board and the completion of our current share buyback program of $250 million.

In January 2009, Logitech initiated a restructuring plan in order to reduce operating expenses and improve financial results in response to deteriorating global economic conditions. We incurred pre-tax restructuring charges of $20.5 million and ~~$1.4~~$1.5 million in the three months ended March 31, 2009 and ~~June~~the six months ended September 30, 2009. We expect to incur up to ~~$2.0~~$0.6 million additional restructuring costs during the remainder of fiscal year 2010. The restructuring plan is expected to generate annual personnel cost savings beginning in fiscal year 2010 of approximately $50 million, and approximately $50 million additional variable cost savings through efforts to limit production costs and operating expenses. The size and timing of future restructuring charges and cost savings are estimates subject to significant future economic, competitive and other uncertainties, and there can be no assurance that we will fully realize the anticipated future results. If economic conditions were to significantly worsen, further actions to reduce costs might be required.

In November 2007, the Company acquired WiLife, Inc., a privately held company that manufactures PC-based video cameras for self-monitoring a home or a small business. The purchase agreement provides for a possible performance-based payment, payable in the first calendar quarter of 2011. The performance-based payment is based on net revenues attributed to WiLife during calendar year 2010. No payment is due if the applicable net revenues total ~~$40~~$40.0 million or less. The maximum performance-based payment is $64.0 million. The total performance-based payment amount, if any, will be recorded in goodwill and will not be known until the end of calendar year 2010.

In fiscal year 2009, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service initiated an examination of the Company’s U.S. subsidiary for fiscal year 2006. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, the Company is not able to estimate the potential future liability, if any, which may result from this examination.

Other contractual obligations and commitments of the Company which require cash are described in the following sections.

Over the past several years, we have generated positive cash flow from our operating activities, including cash from operations of $200.6 million in fiscal year 2009 and ~~$75.5~~$132.9 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. Despite the uncertain economic environment, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents, cash flow generated from operations, and available borrowings under our bank lines of credit will be sufficient to fund our operations for the foreseeable future.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2009, the Company’s outstanding contractual obligations and commitments included the following (in thousands), in addition to the performance based payments we may have to make as part of our acquisition agreements described above:

June 30, 2009
Operating leases $ 60,397
Purchase commitments - inventory 132,301
Purchase obligations - capital expenditures 9,510
Purchase obligations - operating expenses 31,304
Income taxes payable - non-current 104,901
Obligation for management deferred compensation 9,383
Defined benefit pension plan liability 24,494
Other long-term liabilities 2,848
Total contractual obligations and commitments
$ 375,138

	September 30, 2009
Operating leases	$	48,993
Purchase commitments - inventory		148,092
Purchase obligations - capital expenditures		9,930
Purchase obligations - operating expenses		43,093
Income taxes payable - non-current		109,386
Obligation for management deferred compensation		9,788
Defined benefit pension plan liability		20,477
Other long-term liabilities		2,719
Total contractual obligations and commitments	$	392,478

The Company leases facilities under operating leases, certain of which require it to pay property taxes, insurance and maintenance costs. Operating leases for facilities are generally renewable at the Company’s option and usually include escalation clauses linked to inflation. The ~~increase in the amount of future payments under our operating leases from March 31, 2009 was primarily due to a new lease for a research facility in Switzerland. The~~ remaining terms on our non-cancelable operating leases expire in various years through 2027.

Commitments for inventory purchases are made in the normal course of business to original design manufacturers, contract manufacturers and other suppliers, and are expected to be fulfilled by December 31, 2009. Purchase obligations for future capital expenditures support product development activities and ongoing and expanded operations. At ~~June~~September 30, 2009, these purchase obligations primarily related to commitments for manufacturing equipment and tooling. Purchase obligations for operating expenses related to consulting, marketing arrangements, advertising and other services. Although open purchase commitments are considered enforceable and legally binding, the terms generally allow us the option to reschedule and adjust our requirements based on business needs prior to the delivery of the purchases.

The non-current income taxes payable relates to the net unrecognized tax benefits and related accrued interest and penalties of uncertain tax positions. We are unable make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period in which a cash settlement may be made with the tax authorities.

For further detail about our contractual obligations and commitments, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has not entered into any transactions with unconsolidated entities whereby we have financial guarantees, subordinated retained interests, derivative instruments or other contingent arrangements that expose us to material continuing risks, contingent liabilities, or any other obligation under a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to the Company.

Guarantees

Indemnifications

ITEM 3. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

Market risk represents the potential for loss due to adverse changes in the fair value of financial instruments. As a global concern, the Company faces exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates and interest rates. These exposures may change over time as business practices evolve and could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial results.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rates

The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk as it transacts business in multiple foreign currencies, including exposure related to anticipated sales, anticipated purchases and assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. Logitech transacts business in over 30 currencies worldwide, of which the most significant to operations are the Chinese renminbi (“CNY”), Japanese yen, euro, British pound, Taiwanese dollar, Canadian dollar and Mexican peso. The functional currency of the Company’s operations is primarily the U.S. dollar. To a lesser extent, certain operations use the euro, Swiss franc, Japanese yen or the local currency of the country as their functional currencies. Accordingly, unrealized foreign currency gains or losses resulting from the translation of net assets or liabilities denominated in foreign currencies to the U.S. dollar are accumulated in the cumulative translation adjustment component of other comprehensive income in shareholders’ equity.

The table below provides information about the Company’s underlying transactions that are sensitive to foreign exchange rate changes, primarily assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the functional currency, where the net exposure is greater than $0.5 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The table below represents the U.S. dollar impact on earnings of a 10% appreciation and a 10% depreciation of the functional currency as compared with the transaction currency (in thousands):

Functional Currency	Transaction Currency	Net Exposed Long (Short) Currency Position			FX Gain (Loss) From 10% Appreciation of Functional Currency			FX Gain (Loss) From 10% Depreciation of Functional Currency			Transaction Currency	Net Exposed Long (Short) Currency Position			FX Gain (Loss) From 10% Appreciation of Functional Currency			FX Gain (Loss) From 10% Depreciation of Functional Currency
U.S. dollar	Chinese renminbi	$	92,848		$	(8,441	)	$	10,316		Chinese renminbi	$	38,740		$	(3,522	)	$	4,304
euro											British pound		22,651			(2,059	)		2,517
Taiwanese dollar											U.S. dollar		11,590			(1,054	)		1,288
Japanese yen	U.S. dollar		(26,153	)		2,378			(2,906	)	U.S. dollar		(14,226	)		1,293			(1,581	)
Euro	British pound		15,836			(1,440	)		1,760
Taiwanese dollar	U.S. dollar		10,268			(933	)		1,141
U.S. dollar	Canadian dollar		8,313			(756	)		924		Canadian dollar		10,360			(942	)		1,151
Mexican peso	U.S. dollar		(7,784	)		708			(865	)	U.S. dollar		(8,543	)		777			(949	)
Euro	Swedish krona		(1,520	)		138			(169	)
Euro	Utd. Arab Emir. Dirham		1,101			(100	)		122
Euro	U.S. dollar		(1,041	)		95			(116	)
Croatian kuna	Euro		(549	)		50			(61	)
Australian dollar	U.S. dollar		532			(48	)		59
Swiss franc											euro		(3,287	)		299			(365	)
euro											Swedish krona		(2,330	)		212			(259	)
euro											U.S. dollar		(1,273	)		116			(141	)
euro											Utd. Arab Emir. dirham		893			(81	)		99
U.S. dollar											Hong Kong dollar		(860	)		78			(96	)
euro											Czech koruna		(693	)		63			(77	)
euro											Polish zloty		(640	)		58			(71	)
U.S. dollar											Swiss franc		551			(50	)		61
		$	91,851		$	(8,349	)	$	10,205			$	52,933		$	(4,812	)	$	5,881

Long currency positions represent net assets being held in the transaction currency while short currency positions represent net liabilities being held in the transaction currency.

3842

The Company’s principal manufacturing operations are located in China, with much of its component and raw material costs transacted in CNY. However, the functional currency of its Chinese operating subsidiary is the U.S. dollar as its sales and trade receivables are transacted in U.S. dollars. To hedge against any potential significant appreciation of the CNY, the Company holds a portion of its cash investments in CNY-denominated deposit accounts. At ~~June~~September 30, 2009, net assets held in CNY totaled ~~$92.8~~$39 million. The Company continues to evaluate the level of net assets held in CNY relative to component and raw material purchases and interest rates on cash equivalents.

The Company enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to hedge against exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates related to its subsidiaries’ forecasted inventory purchases. The Company has designated these derivatives as cash flow hedges. Logitech does not use derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. These hedging contracts generally mature within six months, and are denominated in the same currency as the underlying transactions. Gains and losses in the fair value of the effective portion of the hedges are deferred as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss until the hedged inventory purchases are sold, at which time the gains or losses are reclassified to cost of goods sold. The notional amounts of foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding related to forecasted inventory purchases were ~~$54.7~~$60.5 million ~~(41.1~~(42.2 million euros) at ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The notional amount represents the future cash flows under contracts to purchase foreign currencies. Deferred realized losses of ~~$2.2~~$2.6 million are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss at ~~June~~September 30, 2009, and are expected to be reclassified to cost of goods sold when the related inventory is sold. Deferred unrealized losses of ~~$3.1~~$1.4 million related to open cash flow hedges are also recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and will be revalued in future periods until the related inventory is sold, at which time the resulting gains or losses will be reclassified to cost of good sold.

The Company also enters into foreign exchange forward contracts to reduce the short-term effects of foreign currency fluctuations on certain foreign currency receivables or payables. These forward contracts generally mature within one to three months. The Company may also enter into foreign exchange swap contracts to economically extend the terms of its foreign exchange forward contracts. The gains or losses on foreign exchange forward contracts are recognized in earnings based on the changes in fair value.

The notional amounts of foreign exchange forward contracts outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 relating to foreign currency receivables or payables were ~~$10.7~~$19.3 million. Open forward contracts as of ~~June~~September 30, 2009 consisted of contracts in British pounds and Canadian dollars to purchase euros and U.S. dollars at a future date at a pre-determined exchange rate. The notional amounts of foreign exchange swap contracts outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 were ~~$28.8~~$26.1 million. Swap contracts outstanding at ~~June~~September 30, 2009 consisted of contracts in Mexican pesos, Japanese yen, Canadian dollars and British pounds.

If the U.S. dollar had appreciated by 10% compared with the hedged foreign currency, an unrealized gain of ~~$8.6~~$7.3 million in our forward foreign exchange contract portfolio would have occurred. If the U.S. dollar had depreciated by 10% compared with the hedged foreign currency, an ~~$8.0~~$11.8 million unrealized loss in our forward foreign exchange contract portfolio would have occurred.

Interest Rates

Changes in interest rates could impact the Company’s anticipated interest income on its cash equivalents and investment securities and interest expense on variable rate short-term debt. The Company prepared sensitivity analyses of its interest rate exposures to assess the impact of hypothetical changes in interest rates. Based on the results of these analyses, a 100 basis point decrease or increase in interest rates from the ~~June~~September 30, 2009 and March 31, 2009 period end rates would not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations or cash flows.

3943

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Logitech’s Chief Executive Officer and ~~acting~~ Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Disclosure controls are controls and procedures designed to reasonably assure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls are also designed to reasonably assure that this information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the ~~acting~~ Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the fiscal quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

4044

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, we become involved in claims and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of our business. We are currently subject to several such claims and a small number of legal proceedings. We presently do not believe that the resolution of these claims and legal proceedings will have a material impact on our results of operations or financial condition.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

~~Adverse~~The strength and timing of the anticipated improvement of our business is uncertain, and economic conditions have and could continue to significantly harm our operating results.

The global ~~deterioration~~economic recession has had a significant negative impact on our business. We anticipate that our business and operating results will improve, in part as a result of the steps we have taken in response to general economic ~~conditions, particularly in retail consumer markets,~~conditions. However, the strength and precise timing of the anticipated improvement of our business is uncertain. In addition, the recession may continue to have the following negative effects on our business, operating results, and financial condition:

·	Reduced sales to our customers, reflecting current and anticipated lower end-user consumer demand for our products as well as a shift in consumer buying patterns toward lower-priced products.

·	Reduced sales to ~~our~~those customers ~~as they~~that continue to lower their required inventory levels.

·	~~Increased risk~~Risk of further customer bankruptcy or business failures, resulting in lower sales levels and increases in bad debt write-offs and receivables reserves.

·	Higher costs for customer incentive programs, cooperative marketing arrangements and price protection used to stimulate demand, which lowers our net sales.

·	Increased downward pressure on our product prices as we lower prices to stimulate demand or reduce inventory, or as competitors lower prices to gain market share in slow-growing or shrinking markets.

·	Product returns in excess of our historical experience rate, resulting in higher returns reserves rates.

·	~~Reduced cash flow due to customer delays or failures in receivables payments.~~

·	~~Increased risk~~Risk of excess and obsolete inventories.

·	Financial distress or bankruptcy of key suppliers, resulting in insufficient product quantities to meet demand for particular products.

·	~~Increased risk~~Risk of counterparty failures due to ~~the~~ continuing stress on financial institutions, which may negatively impact cash, cash equivalents and investment securities.

~~The continuing~~If our business does not improve as we expect, or if global economic ~~recession could have a significant negative impact on~~conditions deteriorate, our ~~business,~~ operating ~~results, and financial condition, producing~~ results in a given quarter could be below the expectations of financial analysts and investors, which could cause the price of our shares to decline.

Our operating results are difficult to predict and fluctuations in results may cause volatility in the price of our shares.

Our revenues and profitability are difficult to predict due to the nature of the markets in which we compete and for many other reasons, including the following:

Our operating results are highly dependent on the volume and timing of orders received during the quarter, which are difficult to forecast. Customers generally order on an as-needed basis and we typically do not obtain firm, long-term purchase commitments from our customers. As a result, our revenues in any quarter depend primarily on orders booked and shipped in that quarter.

·	A significant portion of our quarterly retail sales typically occurs in the last weeks of each quarter, further increasing the difficulty in predicting quarterly revenues and profitability.

We must incur a large portion of our costs in advance of sales orders, because we must plan research and production, order components, buy tooling equipment, and enter into development, sales and marketing, and other operating commitments prior to obtaining firm commitments from our customers. This makes it difficult for us to rapidly adjust our costs during the quarter in response to a revenue shortfall, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Fluctuations in currency exchange rates can impact our revenues, expenses and profitability because we report our financial statements in U.S. dollars, whereas a significant portion of our revenues and expenses are in other currencies. We attempt to adjust product prices over time to offset the impact of currency movements. However, the weakness in consumer spending caused by the current global economic recession has limited our ability to increase local currency selling prices, which has negatively affected and may continue to negatively affect our ability to offset the impact of currency fluctuations.

Because our operating results are difficult to predict, our results may be below the expectations of financial analysts and investors, which could cause the price of our shares to decline.

If we fail to successfully innovate in our current and emerging product categories, our business and operating results could suffer.

The personal peripherals industry is characterized by short product life cycles, frequent new product introductions, rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards. As a result, we must continually innovate in our current and emerging product categories, introduce new products and technologies, and enhance existing products in order to remain competitive.

The success of our products depends on several factors, including our ability to:

·	identify new feature or product opportunities;

·	anticipate technology, market trends and consumer demands;

·	develop innovative and reliable new products and enhancements in a cost-effective and timely manner; and

·	distinguish our products from those of our competitors.

If we do not execute on these factors successfully, products that we introduce or technologies or standards that we adopt may not gain widespread commercial acceptance, and our business and operating results could suffer. In addition, if we do not continue to distinguish our products, particularly our retail products, through distinctive, technologically advanced features, designs, and services, as well as continue to build and strengthen our brand recognition and our access to distribution channels, our business could be harmed.

Our gross margins can vary significantly depending on multiple factors, which can result in unanticipated fluctuations in our operating results.

Our gross margins can vary due to consumer demand, competition, product life cycle, new product introductions, unit volumes, commodity and supply chain costs, geographic sales mix, foreign currency exchange rates, and the complexity and functionality of new product innovations. In particular, if we are not able to introduce new products in a timely manner at the product cost we expect, or if consumer demand for our products is less than we anticipate, or if there are product pricing, marketing and other initiatives by our competitors to which we need to react that lower our margins, then our overall gross margin will be less than we project. For example, in the second half of fiscal year 2009 and the first ~~quarter~~half of fiscal year 2010, ~~growing~~ economic uncertainty caused our customers to reduce purchases of our products below what we had forecasted, and also led us to increase our customer incentives to stimulate demand, which significantly lowered our overall gross margin.

In addition, our gross margins may vary significantly by product line, sales geography and customer type, as well as within product lines. When the mix of products sold shifts from higher margin product lines to lower margin product lines, to lower margin sales geographies, or to lower margin products within product lines, our overall gross margins and our profitability may be adversely affected.

The impact of these factors on gross margins can create unanticipated fluctuations in our operating results, which may cause volatility in the price of our shares.

If we do not compete effectively, demand for our products could decline and our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Our industry is intensely competitive. It is characterized by short product life cycles, continual performance enhancements, and rapid adoption of technological and product advancements by competitors in our retail market, and price sensitivity in the OEM market. We are experiencing aggressive price competition and other promotional activities from our primary competitors and from less-established brands in response to declining consumer demand in both the retail and OEM markets. In addition, our competitors may offer customers terms and conditions which may be more favorable than our terms and conditions and may require us to take actions to increase our customer incentive programs, which could impact our revenues and operating margins.

In recent years, we have expanded the categories of products we sell, and entered new markets, such as the ~~market~~markets for streaming media devices and for home or small business video security systems. We remain alert to opportunities in new categories and markets. As we do so, we are confronting new competitors, many of which have more experience in the categories or markets and have greater marketing resources and brand name recognition than we have. In addition, because of the continuing convergence of the markets for computing devices and consumer electronics, we expect greater competition in the future from well-established consumer electronics companies in our developing categories, as well as in future categories we might enter. Many of these companies, such as Microsoft Corporation, Cisco Systems, Sony and others, have greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources than we have.

Microsoft is a leading producer of operating systems and applications with which our mice, keyboards and webcams are designed to operate. In addition, Microsoft has significantly greater financial, technical, sales, marketing and other resources than Logitech, as well as greater name recognition and a larger customer base. As a result, Microsoft may be able to improve the functionality of its own peripherals to correspond with ongoing enhancements to its operating systems and software applications before we are able to make such improvements. This ability could provide Microsoft with significant lead-time advantages. In addition, Microsoft may be able to offer pricing advantages on bundled hardware and software products that we may not be able to offer, and may be financially positioned to exert significant downward pressure on product prices and upward pressure on promotional incentives in order to gain market share.

Pointing Devices, Keyboards and Desktops. Microsoft is our main competitor in the mice, keyboard and desktop product lines. We also experience competition and pricing pressure for corded and cordless mice and desktops from less-established brands, which has impacted our market share in some sales geographies and which could potentially further impact our market share. The notebook peripheral category is also an area where we face aggressive pricing and promotions, as well as new competitors that have broader notebook product offerings than we do.

Video. Our competitors for PC Web cameras include Microsoft, Creative Labs and Philips. We are encountering aggressive pricing practices and promotions on a worldwide basis, which have impacted our revenues and margins. The worldwide market for PC webcams has been very competitive, and as a result, pricing practices and promotions by our competitors have become more aggressive.

Audio. Competitors in audio devices vary by product line. In the PC, mobile entertainment and communication platform speaker business, competitors include Plantronics and its Altec Lansing subsidiary, Creative Labs, and Bose Corporation. In the PC headset and microphone business, our main competitors include Plantronics and its Altec Lansing subsidiary. We have expanded our audio product portfolio to include network-based audio systems for digital music, an emerging market with several small competitors as well as larger established consumer electronics companies, like Sony and Philips.

Gaming. Competitors for our interactive entertainment products include Intec, Pelican Accessories, Mad Catz and its Saitek subsidiary. Our controllers for PlayStation also compete against controllers offered by Sony.

Remotes. Our competitors for remotes include, among others, Philips, Universal Remote, Universal Electronics, RCA and Sony. We expect that the growth in recent years in consumer demand for personal peripheral devices for home entertainment systems will likely result in increased competition.

If we do not compete effectively, demand for our products could decline, our gross margin could decrease, we could lose market share and our revenues could decline.

If we do not successfully innovate and market products for notebook PCs and mobile devices, our business and results of operations may suffer.

In our retail channels, notebook PCs and mobile devices are sold by retailers without peripherals. We believe this creates opportunities to sell products to consumers to help make their devices more productive and comfortable. However, consumer acceptance and demand for peripherals for use with smaller form factor computing devices such as notebook PCs and mobile devices is still uncertain. ~~In addition, the~~The increasing popularity of notebook PCs and mobile devices may result in a decreased demand by consumers for keyboards and speakers, which could negatively affect our sales of these products. The increasing popularity of mobile devices has coincided with a steadily decreasing average sales price for computing devices, including for desktop and notebook PCs. As a result, there is a risk that the demand for those of our products that have a relatively high average sales price in relation to the price of a desktop or notebook PC will decline. If we do not successfully innovate and market products designed for notebook PCs and other mobile devices, or if general consumer demand for peripherals for use with notebook PCs and mobile devices does not increase, our business and results of operations could be significantly harmed.

If we do not accurately forecast product demand, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

We use our forecasts of product demand to make decisions regarding investments of our resources and production levels of our products. Although we receive forecasts from our customers, many are not obligated to purchase the forecasted demand. Also, actual sales volumes for individual products in our retail distribution channel can be volatile due to changes in consumer preferences and other reasons. In addition, our retail products have short product life cycles, so a failure to accurately predict high demand for a product can result in lost sales that we may not recover in subsequent periods, or higher product costs if we meet demand by paying higher costs for materials, production and delivery. We could also frustrate our customers and lose shelf space. Our failure to predict low demand for a product can result in excess inventory, lower cash flows and lower margins if we are required to reduce product prices in order to reduce inventories.

Over the past few years, we have expanded the number and types of products we sell, and the geographic markets in which we sell them, and we will endeavor to further expand our product portfolio and sales reach. The growth of our product portfolio and our sales markets has increased the difficulty of accurately forecasting product demand.

We have experienced large differences between our forecasts and actual demand for our products and expect differences to arise in the future. If we do not accurately predict product demand, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Our business depends in part on access to third-party platforms or technologies, and if the access is withdrawn, denied, or is not available on terms acceptable to us, or if the platforms or technologies change without notice to us, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Our product portfolio includes products designed for use with third-party platforms, such as ~~the~~ Apple iPod, Microsoft Xbox, Sony PlayStation, and Nintendo Wii. Our business in these categories relies on our access to the platforms of third parties, which can be withdrawn, denied or not be available on terms acceptable to us.

Our access to third-party platforms may require paying a royalty, which lowers our product margins, or may otherwise be on terms that are not acceptable to us. In addition, the third-party platforms or technologies used to interact with our product portfolio can change without prior notice to us, which can result in our having excess inventory or lower margins.

If we are unable to access third-party platforms or technologies, or if our access is withdrawn, denied, or is not available on terms acceptable to us, or if the platforms or technologies change without notice to us, our business and operating results could be adversely affected.

Our principal manufacturing operations and third-party contract manufacturers are located in China, which exposes us to risks associated with doing business in that country.

Our principal manufacturing operations and third-party contract manufacturers are located in China. Our manufacturing operations in Suzhou, China could be severely impacted by changes in the interpretation and enforcement of legal standards, by strains on China’s ~~energy,~~ transportation, communications, trade, public health and other infrastructures, by conflicts, embargoes, disagreements or increased tensions ~~or escalation of hostilities~~ between China and Taiwan, by labor unrest, and by other trade customs and practices that are dissimilar to those in the United States and Europe. Interpretation and enforcement of China’s laws and regulations continue to evolve and we expect differences in interpretation and enforcement to continue in the foreseeable future.

Further, we may be exposed to fluctuations in the value of the Chinese renminbi (“CNY”), the local currency of China. Significant future appreciation of the CNY could increase our component and other raw material costs, as well as our labor costs, and could adversely affect our financial results.

We purchase key components and products from a limited number of sources, and our business and operating results could be harmed if supply were delayed or constrained or if there were shortages of required components.

We purchase certain products and key components from a limited number of sources. If the supply of these products or key components, such as micro-controllers and optical sensors, were to be delayed or constrained, or if one or more of our single-source suppliers goes out of business as a result of adverse global economic conditions, we might be unable to find a new supplier on acceptable terms, or at all, and our product shipments to our customers could be delayed, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

Lead times for materials, components and products ordered by us or by our contract manufacturers can vary significantly and depend on factors such as contract terms, demand for a component, and supplier capacity. From time to time, we have experienced component shortages and extended lead times on semiconductors, such as micro-controllers and optical sensors, and base metals used in our products. Shortages or interruptions in the supply of components or subcontracted products, or our inability to procure these components or products from alternate sources at acceptable prices in a timely manner, could delay shipment of our products or increase our production costs, which could adversely affect our business and operating results.

If we do not successfully coordinate the worldwide manufacturing and distribution of our products, we could lose sales.

Our business requires us to coordinate the manufacture and distribution of our products over much of the world. We rely on third parties to manufacture many of our products, manage centralized distribution centers, and transport our products. If we do not successfully coordinate the timely manufacturing and distribution of our products, we may have insufficient supply of products to meet customer demand and we could lose sales, or we may experience a build-up in inventory.

A significant portion of our quarterly retail orders and product deliveries generally occur in the last weeks of the fiscal quarter. This places pressure on our supply chain and could adversely impact our revenues and profitability if we are unable to successfully fulfill customer orders in the quarter.

We conduct operations in a number of countries and the effect of business, legal and political risks associated with international operations could significantly harm us.

We conduct operations in a number of countries. There are risks inherent in doing business in international markets, including:

·	difficulties in staffing and managing international operations;

·	compliance with laws and regulations, including environmental and tax laws, which vary from country to country and over time, increasing the costs of compliance and potential risks of non-compliance;

·	exposure to political and financial instability, leading to currency exchange losses and collection difficulties or other losses;

·	exposure to fluctuations in the value of local currencies;

·	difficulties or increased costs in establishing sales and distribution channels in unfamiliar markets, with their own market characteristics and competition, particularly in Latin America, Eastern Europe and Asia;

·	changes in value-added tax (“VAT”) or VAT reimbursement;

·	imposition of currency exchange controls; and

·	delays from customs brokers or government agencies.

Any of these risks could significantly harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

We may be unable to protect our proprietary rights. Unauthorized use of our technology may result in the development of products that compete with our products.

Our future success depends in part on our proprietary technology, technical know-how and other intellectual property. We rely on a combination of patent, trade secret, copyright, trademark and other intellectual property laws, and confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions such as nondisclosure terms and licenses, to protect our intellectual property.

We hold various United States patents and pending applications, together with corresponding patents and pending applications from other countries. It is possible that any patent owned by us will be invalidated, deemed unenforceable, circumvented or challenged, that the patent rights granted will not provide competitive advantages to us, or that any of our pending or future patent applications will not be granted. In addition, other intellectual property laws or our confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions may not adequately protect our intellectual property. Also, others may independently develop similar technology, duplicate our products, or design around our patents or other intellectual property rights. Unauthorized parties have copied and may in the future attempt to copy aspects of our products or to obtain and use information that we regard as proprietary. Any of these events could significantly harm our business, financial condition and operating results.

Product quality issues could adversely affect our reputation and could impact our operating results.

The market for our products is characterized by rapidly changing technology and evolving industry standards. To remain competitive, we must continually introduce new products and technologies. The products that we sell could contain defects in design or manufacture. Defects could also occur in the products or components that are supplied to us. There can be no assurance we will be able to detect and remedy all defects in the hardware and software we sell. Failure to do so could result in product recalls, product redesign efforts, lost revenue, loss of reputation, and significant warranty and other expenses to remedy.

Our effective tax rates may increase in the future, which could adversely affect our net income.

We operate in multiple jurisdictions and our profits are taxed pursuant to the tax laws of these jurisdictions. Our effective tax rate may be affected by changes in or interpretations of tax laws in any given jurisdiction, utilization of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, changes in geographical allocation of income and expense, and changes in management’s assessment of matters such as the realizability of deferred tax assets. In the past, we have experienced fluctuations in our effective income tax rate. Our effective income tax rate in a given fiscal year reflects a variety of factors that may not be present in the succeeding fiscal year or years. There is no assurance that our effective income tax rate will not change in future periods. We are currently subject to ongoing audits in various jurisdictions and a material assessment by a governing tax authority could adversely affect our profitability. If our effective tax rate increases in future periods, our net income could be adversely affected.

We may not fully realize the anticipated positive impacts to future financial results from the restructuring announced in January 2009.

In the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009, we implemented a restructuring which reduced Logitech’s salaried workforce globally by 515 employees, in addition to other actions aimed at reducing operating expenses. The restructuring plan is expected to generate annual personnel cost savings beginning in fiscal year 2010 of approximately $50 million, and approximately $50 million additional variable cost savings through efforts to limit production costs and operating expenses.

Our ability to achieve the anticipated variable cost savings and other benefits from this restructuring within the expected time frame is subject to many estimates and assumptions, and may vary materially based on factors such as negotiations with third parties and operational requirements. These estimates and assumptions are subject to significant economic, competitive and other uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. There can be no assurance that we will fully realize the anticipated positive impacts to future financial results from this restructuring. In the event that the current economic conditions significantly worsen, further restructuring measures may be required in the future.

If our estimates and assumptions are incorrect or if other unforeseen events occur, we may not achieve the cost savings expected in fiscal year 2010 and beyond, and our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Share Repurchases

The following table sets forth certain information related to purchases made by Logitech of its equity securities (in thousands, except share and per share amounts):

Total Number Approximate
of Shares
Dollar Value of

Purchased as
Shares That May

Part of Yet Be
Total Number Publicly Purchased
of Shares Average Price Paid Per Share Announced Under the
Period Purchased in USD in CHF Programs Programs
April 1, 2009 - April 30, 2009 - $ - CHF - - $ 125,746
May 1, 2009 - May 31, 2009 - $ - CHF - - 125,746
June 1, 2009 - June 30, 2009 - $ - CHF - - 125,746
Total - $ - CHF - -

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as a Part of Publicly Announced Programs	Approximate Dollar Value of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under the Programs
Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	in USD	in CHF
July, 2009	-	-	-	-	$126,025
August, 2009	3,325	$16.82	CHF 17.99	3,325	70,224
September, 2009	2,513	$18.04	CHF 19.09	2,513	24,985
Total	5,838	$17.35	CHF 18.46	5,838

The repurchases were made pursuant to the share buyback program of $250 million approved in June 2007, ~~program~~which is in effect until the 2010 Annual General Meeting, unless concluded earlier or discontinued.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

We held our Annual General Meeting of Shareholders on September 1, 2009. At the meeting, our shareholders voted on the following seven proposals and cast their votes as follows:

Proposal 1: Approval of the Annual Report, the Compensation Report, the consolidated financial statements and the statutory financial statements of Logitech International S.A. for fiscal year 2009

For	Against	Abstain	Non-Votes
72,127,983	98,994	1,594,013	0
99.86%	0.14%	N/A	N/A

Proposal 2: Advisory vote on compensation philosophy, policies and practices

For	Against	Abstain	Non-Votes
71,315,314	1,985,103	520,573	0
97.29%	2.71%	N/A	N/A

Proposal 3: Appropriation of retained earnings without payment of a dividend

For	Against	Abstain	Non-Votes
72,071,718	1,610,655	137,792	0
97.81%	2.19%	N/A	N/A

Proposal 4: Increase of the number of shares available for issuance under the 2006 Stock Incentive Plan

For	Against	Abstain	Non-Votes
44,569,727	19,941,905	324,835	8,983,198
69.09%	30.91%	N/A	N/A

Proposal 5: Release of the Board of Directors and Executive Officers for activities during fiscal year 2009

For	Against	Abstain	Non-Votes
61,685,410	553,066	380,718	0
99.11%	0.89%	N/A	N/A

Proposal 6.1: Re-election of Mr. Erh-Hsun Chang

For	Against	Abstain	Non-Votes
73,141,310	323,905	353,927	0
99.56%	0.44%	N/A	N/A

Proposal 6.2: Re-election of Mr. Kee-Lock Chua

For	Against	Abstain	Non-Votes
73,224,332	241,795	353,015	0
99.67%	0.33%	N/A	N/A

Proposal 7: Re-election of PricewaterhouseCoopers SA as auditors

For	Against	Abstain	Non-Votes
73,495,104	199,124	124,914	0
99.73%	0.27%	N/A	N/A

4854

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit Index

Exhibit No.	Description

10.1	Representative form of Stock Option Agreement for non-executive Board members under the Logitech International S.A. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan

10.2	Representative form of Stock Option Agreement for employees, including executive officers, under the Logitech International S.A. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan

10.3	Representative form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for non-executive Board members under the Logitech International S.A. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan

10.4	Representative form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement for executive officers under the Logitech International S.A. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan

10.5	Compensation terms for non-executive Board members for the September 2009 - September 2010 Board Year

10.14.1	Executive Officer ~~Base Salary~~base salary, duties and authority under ~~Form~~form of ~~Employment Agreements~~employment agreements dated December 3, 2008

31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive ~~Officer.~~Officer

31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of ~~acting~~ Chief Financial ~~Officer.~~Officer

32.1	Section 1350 Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and ~~acting~~ Chief Financial ~~Officer.~~Officer**

This exhibit is furnished herewith, but not deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to liability under that section. Such certifications will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we explicitly incorporate them by reference.

4955

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LOGITECH INTERNATIONAL S.A.


	/s/ Gerald P. Quindlen
	Gerald P. Quindlen President and Chief Executive Officer


	/s/ ~~Thomas E. Fergoda~~Erik K. Bardman
	~~Thomas E. Fergoda~~Erik K. Bardman Senior Vice President of Finance and ~~Corporate Controller~~Chief Financial Officer

~~August 10,~~

November 4, 2009

	June 30, 2009
Operating leases	$	60,397
Purchase commitments - inventory		132,301
Purchase obligations - capital expenditures		9,510
Purchase obligations - operating expenses		31,304
Income taxes payable - non-current		104,901
Obligation for management deferred compensation		9,383
Defined benefit pension plan liability		24,494
Other long-term liabilities		2,848
Total contractual obligations and commitments	$	375,138

							Total Number		Approximate
							of Shares		Dollar Value of
							Purchased as		Shares That May
							Part of		Yet Be
	Total Number						Publicly		Purchased
	of Shares		Average Price Paid Per Share				Announced		Under the
Period	Purchased		in USD			in CHF	Programs		Programs
April 1, 2009 - April 30, 2009		-	$	-	CHF	-		-	$	125,746
May 1, 2009 - May 31, 2009		-	$	-	CHF	-		-		125,746
June 1, 2009 - June 30, 2009		-	$	-	CHF	-		-		125,746
Total		-	$	-	CHF	-		-