UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to _________

Commission File Number: 001-16577

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter).



Michigan		38-3150651
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

5151 Corporate Drive, Troy, Michigan		48098-2639
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip code)

(248) 312-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Not applicable

(Former name, former address and formal fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý No ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ý No ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated ~~filer"~~filer," "smaller reporting company," and ~~"smaller reporting~~"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):



Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	ý
Non-accelerated filer	o (Do not check if smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	¨
		Emerging growth company	¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act ¨.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No ý.

As of ~~November~~May 4, ~~2016~~2017, ~~56,606,499~~57,060,689 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, were issued and outstanding.

FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC.

FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTER ENDED ~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2016~~MARCH 31, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS




PART I. – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition – ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2015~~2016 (unaudited)	432
	Consolidated Statements of Operations – For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015~~ (unaudited)	533
	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income – For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015~~ (unaudited)	634
	Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity – For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015~~ (unaudited)	634
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows – For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and 2016 ~~and 2015~~ (unaudited)	835
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Note 1 - Basis of Presentation	936
	Note 2 - Investment Securities	936
	Note 3 - Loans Held-for-Sale	1138
	Note 4 - Loans Held-for-Investment	1239
	Note 5 - Loans With Government Guarantees	2146
	Note 6 - Variable Interest Entities ("VIEs")	2146
	Note 7 - Mortgage Servicing Rights	2246
	Note 8 - Derivative Financial Instruments	2348
	Note 9 - ~~Debt~~Borrowings	2751
	Note 10 - Representation and Warranty Reserve	2953
	Note 11 - Warrants and Restricted Stock Units	2953
	Note 12 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	2954
	Note 13 - Earnings Per Share	3055
	Note 14 - Income Taxes	3155
	Note 15 - Regulatory Matters	3156
	Note 16 - Legal Proceeding, Contingencies, and Commitments	3257
	Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements	3459
	Note 18 - Segment Information	4569
	Note 19 - Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements	4971

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	514
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	9174
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	9174

~~FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC.~~

~~FORM 10-Q~~

~~FOR THE QUARTER ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2016~~

~~TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued)~~



PART II. – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	9275
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	9275
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	9275
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	9275
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	9275
Item 5.	Other Information	9275
Item 6.	Exhibits	9275

SIGNATURES		9376

GLOSSARY OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

The following list of abbreviations and acronyms are provided as a tool for the reader and may be used throughout this Report, including the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes:



Term	Definition	Term	Definition
AFS	Available for Sale	HELOC	Home Equity Lines of Credit
Agencies	Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, and Government National Mortgage Association, Collectively	HPI	Housing Price Index
ALCO	Asset Liability Committee	HTM	Held to Maturity
ALLL	Allowance for Loan & Lease Losses	LIBOR	London Interbank Offered Rate
AOCI	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	LHFI	Loans Held-for-Investment
ASU	Accounting Standards Update	LHFS	Loans Held-for-Sale
Basel III	Basel Committee on Banking Supervision Third Basel Accord	LTV	Loan-to-Value
C&I	Commercial and Industrial	Management	Flagstar Bancorp’s Management
CDARS	Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service	MBIA	MBIA Insurance Corporation
CFPB	Consumer Financial Protection Bureau	MBS	Mortgage-Backed Securities
CLTV	Combined Loan to Value	MD&A	Management's Discussion and Analysis
Common Stock	Common Shares	MSR	Mortgage Servicing Rights
CRE	Commercial Real Estate	N/A	Not Applicable
DFAST	Dodd-Frank Stress Test	NYSE	New York Stock Exchange
DOJ	United States Department of Justice	OCC	Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
DTA	Deferred Tax Asset	OFHEO	Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight
EVE	Economic Value of Equity	OTTI	Other-Than-Temporary-Impairment
Fannie Mae/FNMA	Federal National Mortgage Association	QTL	Qualified Thrift Lending
FASB	Financial Accounting Standards Board	RWA	Risk Weighted Assets
FDIC	Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation	SEC	Securities and Exchange Commission
FHA	Federal Housing Administration	TARP	Troubled Asset Relief Program
FHLB	Federal Home Loan Bank	TDR	Trouble Debt Restructuring
FICO	Fair Isaac Corporation	UPB	Unpaid Principal Balance
FRB	Federal Reserve Bank	U.S. Treasury	United States Department of Treasury
Freddie Mac	Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation	VIE	Variable Interest Entities
FTE	Full Time Employees	XBRL	eXtensible Business Reporting Language
GAAP	United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following is Management's Discussion and Analysis of the financial condition and results of operations of Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. for the first quarter of 2017, which should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes set forth in Item 1 of this Form 10-Q and Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.'s 2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to statements included within the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. These statements are based on the current beliefs and expectations of our management. Actual results may differ from those set forth in forward-looking statements. See Forward-Looking Statements on page 31 of this Form 10-Q and Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors of Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.'s 2016 Annual Report or Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. Additional information about Flagstar can be found on our website at www.flagstar.com.

Where we say "we," "us," "our," the "Company" or "Flagstar," we usually mean Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. However, in some cases, a reference to "we," "us," "our," the "Company" or "Flagstar" will include our wholly-owned subsidiary Flagstar Bank, FSB (the "Bank"). See the Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms on page 3 for definitions used throughout this Form 10-Q.

Introduction

We are a Michigan-based savings and loan holding company founded in 1993. Our business is primarily conducted through our principal subsidiary, the Bank, a federally chartered stock savings bank founded in 1987. Based on our assets at March 31, 2017, we are one of the largest banks headquartered in Michigan, providing commercial, small business, and consumer banking services. At March 31, 2017, we had 2,948 full-time equivalent employees inclusive of account executives and loan officers. Our common stock is listed on the NYSE under the symbol "FBC." We are considered a controlled company for NYSE purposes, because MP Thrift Investments, L.P. held approximately 62.4 percent of our common stock as of March 31, 2017.

Our banking network emphasizes the delivery of a complete set of banking and mortgage products and services and we distinguish ourselves by crafting specialized solutions for our customers, local delivery, customer service and competitive product pricing. At March 31, 2017, we operated 99 full services banking branches throughout Michigan's major markets where we offer a full set of banking products to consumer, commercial, and government customers.

We have a unique, relationship-based business model of a leading Michigan-based bank leveraging a national mortgage business which, itself, leverages the bank. We believe our strong position and focus on service creates a significant competitive advantage in the markets in which we compete. The disciplined management team we have assembled is focused on developing substantial and attractive growth opportunities that generate profitable operations with significant operating leverage. We believe our lower risk profile and strong capital level positions us to better exploit the opportunities that our business model yields and deliver attractive shareholder returns over the long term.

We are a national mortgage originator and utilize multiple origination channels including correspondent, broker, distributed retail, and direct to consumer. We also service and subservice mortgage loans for others on a fee for service basis and may also collect ancillary fees, such as late fees and earn income through the use of noninterest bearing escrow deposits. These escrow deposit accounts and amounts received from servicing loans generate company controlled deposits which offer a stable, low cost, long-term source of funding.

Operating Segments

Our operations are conducted through three operating segments: Community Banking, Mortgage Originations, Mortgage Servicing. Additionally, our Other segment includes the remaining reported activities. For financial information and additional details regarding each of these operating segments, please see MD&A - Operating Segments and Note 18 - Segment Information, which are incorporated herein by reference.

Selected Financial Ratios

(Dollars in millions, except share data)



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
Selected Ratios:
Interest rate spread	2.49		%	2.50		%
Net interest margin	2.67		%	2.66		%
Return on average assets	0.76		%	1.16		%
Return on average equity	7.88		%	10.08		%
Return on average common equity	7.88		%	12.15		%
Equity/assets ratio (average for the period)	9.59		%	11.52		%
Efficiency ratio	76.8		%	74.5		%
Bancorp Tier 1 leverage (to adjusted tangible assets) (1)	9.31		%	11.04		%
Bank Tier 1 leverage (to adjusted tangible assets)	10.74		%	11.43		%
Average Balances:
Average common shares outstanding	56,921,605			56,513,715
Average fully diluted shares outstanding	58,072,563			57,600,984
Average interest earning assets	$	12,343		$	11,871
Average interest paying liabilities	$	10,319		$	9,823
Average stockholders' equity	$	1,346		$	1,561



	March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Selected Statistics:
Book value per common share	$	24.03		$	23.50
Number of common shares outstanding	57,043,565			56,824,802
Equity-to-assets ratio	8.92		%	9.50		%
Common equity-to-assets ratio	8.92		%	9.50		%
Mortgage rate lock commitments (fallout-adjusted) (2)	$	5,996		$	6,091
Mortgage loans sold and securitized	$	4,484		$	8,422
Number of banking centers	99			99
Number of FTE	2,948			2,886


(1)	Basel III transitional.


(2)	Fallout adjusted refers to mortgage rate lock commitments which are adjusted by a percentage of mortgage loans in the pipeline that are not expected to close based on previous historical experience and the level of interest rates.

Executive Overview

The first quarter 2017 resulted in solid earnings of $27 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, despite facing the headwinds of seasonality and higher interest rates in our mortgage business. Our Community Bank continued to be a solid contributor to net interest income where strong growth in commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and mortgage loans partially overcame a decline in warehouse loans. Asset quality remained strong with nonperforming loans declining to $28 million, the lowest reported in over 20 years. We also saw continued growth in retail deposits at an attractive funding level.

We saw strong returns on the mortgage servicing rights we hold, reflecting the stronger market we are seeing in this interest rate environment. Benefiting from these market conditions, we continued to execute our strategy to reduce MSRs given the requirements of Basel III. In the first quarter, we sold $65 million of our mortgage servicing rights. In the second quarter, we have entered into pending bulk sales of an additional $195 million of mortgage servicing rights under contract at an approximately break-even price, including transaction costs. We have retained servicing on approximately 80 percent of the total MSR sale amount.

We recently announced two acquisitions that will support our position as a national leader in the mortgage industry. First was the purchase of the delegated correspondent business of Stearns Lending. This was an opportunistic acquisition that allows us to become a top five player in this channel. Second was our agreement to purchase certain assets of Opes Advisors, a high-quality retail mortgage originator, which we expect to close in the second quarter. This pending acquisition dovetails nicely with our interest in growing our retail mortgage channel.

We remain committed to continuing to grow our Community Bank and solidifying our position as an industry leader in mortgage banking. Looking ahead, we believe we are well positioned to benefit from a stronger economy, a stronger housing market and the pivot to a stronger purchase mortgage market.

Earnings Performance



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income	$	83	$	79
Provision (benefit) for loan losses	3		(13		)
Total noninterest income	100		105
Total noninterest expense	140		137
Provision for income taxes	13		21
Net income	$	27	$	39
Income per share
Basic	$	0.47	$	0.56
Diluted	$	0.46	$	0.54

Our net income decreased $12 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. Net interest income increased $4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase was primarily driven by strong commercial loan growth as a result of our strategic initiative to grow the Community Bank and improve margins by continuing to add higher margin loans within all portfolios. This is highlighted by an increase in the average balances of our commercial and industrial and commercial real estate portfolios, which were up 35 percent and 60 percent, respectively. This improvement in net interest income was more than offset by an increase in provision for loan losses and lower noninterest income.

In the first quarter 2017, our provision approximated net charge-offs as compared to a 2016 first quarter benefit which resulted from a release of reserves driven by a decrease in residential first mortgage loans primarily due to the sales of $787 million UPB of performing first residential loans and $96 million UPB of nonperforming, TDR and non-agency residential mortgage loans. This first quarter 2016 sales resulted in a $9 million gain on sale.

Net Interest Income

The following table presents, on a consolidated basis, interest income from average assets and liabilities, expressed in dollars and yields:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017						2016
	Average Balance		Interest		Annualized Yield/ Rate		Average Balance		Interest		Annualized Yield/ Rate
	(Dollars in millions)
Interest-Earning Assets
Loans held-for-sale	$	3,286	$	32	3.87	%	$	2,909	$	28	3.81	%
Loans held-for-investment
Consumer loans (1)	2,857		26		3.60	%	3,314		29		3.52	%
Commercial loans (1)	2,782		29		4.19	%	2,354		23		3.91	%
Total loans held-for-investment	5,639		55		3.89	%	5,668		52		3.68	%
Loans with government guarantees	342		4		4.61	%	475		4		3.05	%
Investment securities	3,012		19		2.51	%	2,692		17		2.51	%
Interest-earning deposits	64		—		0.86	%	127		—		0.52	%
Total interest-earning assets	12,343		110		3.55	%	11,871		101		3.39	%
Other assets	1,700						1,672
Total assets	$	14,043					$	13,543
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Retail deposits
Demand deposits	$	507	$	—	0.18	%	$	445	$	—	0.13	%
Savings deposits	3,928		7		0.76	%	3,722		7		0.79	%
Money market deposits	276		1		0.46	%	243		—		0.36	%
Certificates of deposit	1,073		3		1.06	%	856		2		0.92	%
Total retail deposits	5,784		11		0.75	%	5,266		9		0.74	%
Government deposits
Demand deposits	235		—		0.39	%	256		—		0.39	%
Savings deposits	459		1		0.52	%	419		1		0.52	%
Certificates of deposit	318		—		0.63	%	412		1		0.47	%
Total government deposits	1,012		1		0.52	%	1,087		2		0.47	%
Wholesale deposits and other	8		—		0.39	%	—		—		—	%
Total interest-bearing deposits	6,804		12		0.72	%	6,353		11		0.69	%
Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other	1,822		3		0.73	%	1,662		2		0.38	%
Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances	1,200		6		1.87	%	1,560		7		1.86	%
Other long-term debt	493		6		5.04	%	248		2		3.22	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	10,319		27		1.06	%	9,823		22		0.89	%
Noninterest-bearing deposits (2)	1,991						1,697
Other liabilities	387						462
Stockholders’ equity	1,346						1,561
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	14,043					$	13,543
Net interest-earning assets	$	2,024					$	2,048
Net interest income			$	83					$	79
Interest rate spread (3)					2.49	%					2.50	%
Net interest margin (4)					2.67	%					2.66	%
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities					119.6	%					120.9	%


(1)	Consumer loans include: residential first mortgage, second mortgage, HELOC, and other consumer loans. Commercial loans include: commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and warehouse lending loans. Includes nonaccrual loans, for further information relating to nonaccrual loans, see Note 4 - Loans Held-for-Investment.


(2)	Includes noninterest-bearing company controlled deposits that arise due to the servicing of loans for others.


(3)	Interest rate spread is the difference between rates of interest earned on interest-earning assets and rates of interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities.


(4)	Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

Rate/Volume Analysis

The following table presents the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for the components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that are presented in the preceding table. The table below distinguishes between the changes related to average outstanding balances (changes in volume while holding the initial rate constant) and the changes related to average interest rates (changes in average rates while holding the initial balance constant). The rate/volume variances are allocated to variances due to rate.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017 Versus 2016 Increase (Decrease) Due to:
	Rate		Volume			Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Interest-Earning Assets
Loans held-for-sale	$	—	$	4		$	4
Loans held-for-investment
Consumer loans (1)	1		(4		)	(3		)
Commercial loans (2)	3		3			6
Total loans held-for-investment	4		(1		)	3
Loans with government guarantees	1		(1		)	—
Investment securities	—		2			2
Interest-earning deposits	—		—			—
Total interest-earning assets	$	5	$	4		$	9
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Retail deposits
Demand deposits	$	—	$	—		$	—
Savings deposits	—		—			—
Money market deposits	—		1			1
Certificates of deposit	—		1			1
Total retail deposits	—		2			2
Government deposits
Demand deposits	—		—			—
Savings deposits	—		—			—
Certificates of deposits	—		(1		)	(1		)
Total government deposits	—		(1		)	(1		)
Wholesale deposits and other	—		—			—
Total interest-bearing deposits	—		1			1
Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other	1		—			1
Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances	—		(1		)	(1		)
Other long-term debt	2		2			4
Total interest-bearing liabilities	3		2			5
Change in net interest income	$	2	$	2		$	4


(1)	Consumer loans include residential first mortgage, second mortgage, HELOC, and other consumer loans.


(2)	Commercial loans include commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and warehouse lending.

Comparison to Prior Year Quarter

Net interest income increased $4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, primarily driven by an increase in average rates and growth in interest-earning assets. This was partially offset by an increase in average rate and average balance of interest-bearing debt due to the issuance of $250 million of 6.125 percent senior notes ("2021 Senior Notes"), which occurred in the third quarter of 2016. Our net interest margin for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was 2.67 percent, compared to 2.66 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The net 1 basis point increase was driven by mix, resulting from us shifting from lower yielding residential mortgage loans to higher yielding

commercial loans, which was further positively impacted by an increase in market rates. This improvement was partially offset by the issuance of our 2021 Senior Notes in the third quarter 2016.

For the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016, average LHFS increased $377 million primarily due to extending turn times while the combined $748 million increase in average commercial loans and average investment securities was consistent with our strategy to grow the community bank and enhance the yield on our interest earning assets. Declines in average consumer loans and loans with government guarantees were the result of sales that occurred throughout 2016.

Average interest bearing liabilities increased $496 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase was driven by a $451 million increase in average total deposits and the issuance of our 2021 Senior Notes, partially offset by lower FHLB advances.

Provision (Benefit) for Loan Losses

Comparison to Prior Year Quarter

The provision (benefit) for loan losses was a provision of $3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to a benefit of $13 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the $3 million provision approximated net charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The $13 million benefit during the three months ended March 31, 2016, resulted primarily from a release of reserves driven by a decrease in residential first mortgage loans due to the sale of $787 million UPB of performing residential first mortgage loans and $96 million UPB of nonperforming, TDR and non-agency residential mortgage loans.

Net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2017 decreased to $4 million, compared to $12 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, net charge-offs included $2 million and $3 million associated with loans with government guarantees, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2017, net charge-offs included $1 million associated with the sale or transfer of $106 million UPB of nonperforming, performing, and jumbo loans, compared to $6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016 associated with the sale or transfer of $96 million of nonperforming, TDR and non-agency loans. As a percentage of the average LHFI, net charge-offs for the three months ended March 31, 2017 decreased to 0.27 percent from 0.86 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2016. Excluding the charge-offs associated with loan sales or transfers and loans with government guarantees, net charge-offs as a percentage of the average LHFI were 0.07 percent during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to 0.20 percent during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

For further information on the provision for loan losses see MD&A - Allowance for Loan Losses.

Noninterest Income

The following tables provide information on our noninterest income along with additional details related to our net gain on loan sales and other mortgage metrics:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Net gain on loan sales	$	48	$	75
Loan fees and charges	15		15
Deposit fees and charges	4		6
Loan administration income	5		6
Net (loss) return on mortgage servicing rights	14		(6		)
Representation and warranty benefit	4		2
Other noninterest income	10		7
Total noninterest income	$	100	$	105



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017			March 31, 2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Mortgage rate lock commitments (fallout-adjusted) (1)	$	5,996		$	6,863
Net margin on mortgage rate lock commitments (fallout-adjusted) (1) (2)	0.80		%	0.96		%
Gain on loan sales LHFS + net (loss) return on the MSR	$	62		$	60
Residential loans serviced (number of accounts - 000's) (3)	393			354
Capitalized value of MSRs	1.10		%	1.06		%
Mortgage loans sold and securitized	4,484			6,948
Net margin on loans sold and securitized	1.06		%	0.94		%


(1)	Fallout adjusted refers to mortgage rate lock commitments which are adjusted by a percentage of mortgage loans in the pipeline that are not expected to close based on our historical experience and the level of interest rates.


(2)	Gain on sale margin is based on net gain on loan sales related to LHFS to fallout-adjusted mortgage rate lock commitments.


(3)	Includes serviced for own loan portfolio, serviced for others and subserviced for others loans.

Comparison to Prior Year Quarter

Total noninterest income decreased $5 million in the first quarter 2017, compared to the same period in 2016.

Net gain on loan sales decreased $27 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to $867 million in lower fallout-adjusted locks, driven by lower refinance activity as a result of higher rates, partially offset by improved purchase volume. The net gain on loan sales margin decreased 16 basis points primarily driven by our decision to extend turn times on LHFS which benefits net interest income during periods of lower loan production. The decrease in net gain on loan sales was also attributed to increased loan sales occurring in the first quarter 2016 that resulted in a $9 million gain on loan sale.

Net return on MSRs was $14 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to a loss of $6 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The $20 million increase was primarily driven by the higher interest rate environment we experienced in the first quarter of 2017 which resulted in lower prepayments, lower prepayment assumptions and favorable fair value adjustments driven by other improved market pricing indicators.

Representation and warranty benefit was $4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to a benefit of $2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The representation and warranty reserve was reduced by $4 million in the first quarter 2017, reflecting a continued improvement in risk trends and lower repurchase pipeline which was only $6 million as of March 31, 2017.

Noninterest Expense

The following table sets forth the components of our noninterest expense:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Compensation and benefits	$	72		$	68
Commissions	10			10
Occupancy and equipment	22			22
Loan processing expense	12			12
Legal and professional expense	7			9
Other noninterest expense	17			16
Total noninterest expense	$	140		$	137
Efficiency ratio	76.8		%	74.5		%

Comparison to Prior Year Quarter

Noninterest expense increased $3 million to $140 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $137 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016. An increase in compensation and benefits was the primary driver of the change, driven by an increase in headcount to support both growth in Community Banking and an acquisition completed in the first quarter of 2017.

Provision (benefit) for Income Taxes

Our provision for income taxes for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was $13 million, compared to a provision of $21 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2017 was 33.1 percent, compared to 34.3 percent for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Our effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2017 differs from the combined federal and state statutory tax rate primarily due to non-taxable bank owned life insurance and other tax-exempt earnings, partially offset by nondeductible expenses.

For further information, see Note 14 - Income Taxes.

OPERATING SEGMENTS

Overview

For detail on each segment's objectives, strategies, and priorities, please read this section in conjunction with Note 18 - Segment Information, and other sections for a full understanding of our consolidated financial performance.

The net income (loss) by operating segment is presented in the following table:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Community Banking	$	6		$	18
Mortgage Originations	26			23
Mortgage Servicing	(5		)	(5		)
Other	—			3
Total net income	$	27		$	39

Community Banking

Comparison to Prior Year Quarter

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Community Banking segment reported net income of $6 million, compared to $18 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The provision for loans losses totaled $2 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to a benefit of $13 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The $15 million increase in provision for loan losses primarily resulted from first quarter 2016 sales of residential first mortgage loans. Other noninterest income decreased $7 million primarily due to a decline in net gain on loan sales. These were partially offset by a $7 million decrease in provision for income taxes, along with an increase in net interest income of $4 million primarily due to an increase in deposit spread in addition to loan growth.

Mortgage Originations

Comparison to Prior Year Quarter

The Mortgage Originations segment net income increased $3 million to $26 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $23 million in the three months ended March 31, 2016. The increase was primarily due to $20 million higher net return on the MSRs driven by the higher interest rate environment we experienced in the first quarter of 2017 which resulted in lower prepayments, lower prepayment assumptions and favorable fair value adjustments driven by other improved market pricing indicators. The increase was partially offset by a $19 million decrease in net gain on loan sales primarily due to an $867 million decrease in fallout-adjusted locks and a 16 basis point decrease in margin resulting from competitive factors and the impact of extending turn times on LHFS.

Mortgage Servicing

Comparison to Prior Year Quarter

The Mortgage Servicing segment reported a net loss of $5 million for both the three months ended March 31, 2017, and for the three months ended March 31, 2016. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we had an increase in other noninterest income primarily due to an increase in fees resulting from a higher number of loans serviced, offset by an increase in asset resolution expense and an increase in compensation and benefits expense driven by higher headcount.

Other

Comparison to Prior Year Quarter

For the three months ended March 31, 2017, the Other segment net income was less than $1 million, as compared to net income of $3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease was primarily due to a reduction in net interest income, as a result of interest expense due to our issuance of our 2021 Senior Notes, which occurred in the third quarter of 2016.

RISK MANAGEMENT

Like all financial services companies, we engage in business activities and assume the related risks. The risks we are subject to in the normal course of business, include, but are not limited to, credit, regulatory compliance, legal, reputation, liquidity, market, operational, and strategic. We have made significant investments in our risk management activities which are focused on ensuring we properly identify, measure and manage such risks across the entire enterprise to maintain safety and soundness and maximize profitability. We hold capital to protect from the risk of unexpected loss.

A comprehensive discussion of risks affecting us can be found in the Risk Factors section included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. Some of the more significant processes used to manage and control credit, liquidity, market, and operational risks are described in the following paragraphs.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is the risk of loss to us arising from an obligor’s inability or failure to meet contractual payment or performance terms. Like other financial services institutions, we make loans, extend credit, purchase securities, and enter into financial derivative contracts, all of which have related credit risk. The majority of our credit risk is associated with lending activities, as the acceptance and management of credit risk is central to profitable lending.

Loans held-for-investment

Loans held-for-investment decreased from $6.1 billion at December 31, 2016, to $6.0 billion at March 31, 2017. For the period, growth in our commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and consumer loan portfolios was more than offset by a $397 million decline in warehouse loans which was the result of seasonality and a lower mortgage market driven by a reduction in refinance volume partially offset by higher purchase volume.

For further information relating to the LHFI, see Note 4 - Loans Held-for-Investment.

Residential first mortgage loans. We originate or purchase various types of conforming and non-conforming fixed and adjustable rate loans underwritten using Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines for the purpose of purchasing or refinancing owner occupied and second home properties. The LTV requirements vary depending on occupancy, property type, loan amount, and FICO. Loans with LTVs exceeding 80 percent are required to obtain mortgage insurance.

At March 31, 2017, the largest geographic concentrations of our residential first mortgage loans in our held-for-investment portfolio were in California, Michigan, and Florida, which represented 56 percent of such loans outstanding.

The following table identifies our residential first LHFI mortgages by major category:



	Unpaid Principal Balance (1)		Average Note Rate		Average Original FICO Score	Average Current FICO Score (2)	Weighted Average Maturity (months) (3)	Average Original LTV Ratio		Housing Price Index LTV, as recalculated (4)
	(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2017
Amortizing (5)	$	2,375	3.47	%	757	758	322	64.9	%	55.8	%
Interest-only (5)(6)	68		3.83	%	763	764	331	57.8	%	45.4	%
Total residential first mortgage loans	$	2,443	3.48	%	757	759	322	64.8	%	55.5	%

December 31, 2016
Amortizing (5)	$	2,244	3.45	%	756	757	321	65.5	%	56.1	%
Interest-only (5)(6)	69		3.65	%	762	761	326	58.6	%	47.5	%
Total residential first mortgage loans	$	2,313	3.45	%	756	757	321	65.3	%	55.8	%


(1)	Unpaid principal balance, net of write downs, does not include premiums or discounts.


(2)	Current FICO scores updated as of February 28, 2017, where available, or most recent credit score.


(3)	Measured in months, weighted average remaining months to maturity.


(4)	The HPI LTV is updated from the original LTV based on Metropolitan Statistical Area-level, OFHEO data as of December 31, 2016.


(5)	Includes 3, 5, and 7 year adjustable rate mortgages along with fixed rate mortgages.


(6)	Includes only those loans that are currently in the interest-only phase of repayment. Loans originated as interest-only that are now amortizing are included in amortizing loans.

Second mortgage loans/HELOANs. The second mortgage loans require full documentation and are underwritten and priced to ensure high credit quality and loan profitability. Our current allowable debt-to-income ratio for approval of second mortgages is capped at 43 percent. We currently limit the maximum CLTV to 89.99 percent and FICO scores to a minimum of 660. Current fixed rate loans are available with terms up to 15 years.

Home Equity Line of Credit loans. HELOC loans require full documentation and are underwritten and priced to ensure high credit quality and loan profitability. Underwriting guidelines for our HELOC originations have been established to attract higher credit quality loans with long-term profitability. HELOC loans are adjustable-rate loans that contain a 10-year interest-only draw period followed by a 20-year amortizing period. We also offer HELOC loans for a term period of five to 15 years to repay. Generally, the minimum FICO is 660, maximum CLTV up to 89.99 percent, and the maximum debt-to-income ratio is 45 percent.

Commercial loans held-for-investment. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we have continued to grow our commercial loan portfolio. Our Community Banking segment includes relationships with relationship managers throughout Michigan's major markets. Our commercial LHFI totaled $3.1 billion at March 31, 2017 and $3.3 billion at December 31, 2016. The portfolio consists of three loan types: commercial and industrial (includes direct finance leases), CRE, and warehouse, each of which is discussed in more detail below.

Commercial and industrial loans. Commercial and industrial LHFI facilities typically include lines of credit and term loans to middle market businesses for use in normal business operations to finance working capital, equipment and capital purchases, acquisition and expansion projects. This portfolio includes unsecured home builder loans of $69 million at March 31, 2017. We lend to customers with a history of profitability and a long-term business model. Generally, leverage is limited to a ratio of 3 times and the minimum debt service coverage is 1.20. Most of our C&I loans earn interest at a variable rate and we offer our customers the ability to enter into interest rate swaps.

Commercial real estate loans. Our commercial real estate LHFI portfolio is comprised of loans that are collateralized by diversified real estate properties intended to be income-producing in the normal course of business. Our commercial real

estate lending relationships are primarily based in the Midwest. Generally, the maximum LTV is 80 percent, or 85 percent for owner-occupied real estate and debt service coverage of 1.20 to 1.35 times. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, our commercial real estate LHFI portfolio grew $138 million to a balance of $1.4 billion. This portfolio also includes owner occupied real estate loans, in addition to secured home builder loans. In 2016, we launched a national home builder finance program to grow our balance sheet, increase commercial deposits and develop incremental revenue through our retail purchase mortgage channel. We had $202 million of secured home builder loans outstanding at March 31, 2017.

The following table presents our total unpaid principal balance (net of write downs) of CRE LHFI by borrower's geographic concentration and collateral type at March 31, 2017:



	State
	Michigan			Florida			Colorado			California			Other			Total (1)
	(Dollars in millions)
Collateral Type
Office	$	193		$	—		$	—		$	19		$	—		$	212
Retail	154			34			—			9			12			209
Single family residence, which includes land	48			31			45			1			76			201
Apartments	130			6			—			—			54			190
Industrial	120			—			—			25			4			149
Hotel/motel	72			—			—			—			35			107
Parking garage/Lot	63			—			—			—			—			63
Land - residential development	13			14			25			—			10			62
Shopping center	36			—			—			—			6			42
Senior living facility	37			—			—			—			—			37
Non Profit	31			—			—			—			—			31
Marina	24			—			—			—			—			24
Special Purposes and all other (2)	40			1			—			14			23			78
Total	$	961		$	86		$	70		$	68		$	220		$	1,405
Percent	68.4		%	6.1		%	5.0		%	4.8		%	15.7		%	100.0		%


(1)	Unpaid principal balance, net of write downs, does not include premiums or discounts. Includes $243 million of commercial owner occupied real estate loans at March 31, 2017.


(2)	Special purpose and all other primarily includes: condominiums, movie theaters, land (vacant), nursing home, and charter schools, etc.

Warehouse lending. We also offer warehouse lines of credit to other mortgage lenders. These allow the lender to fund the closing of residential first mortgage loans. Each extension or draw-down on the line is collateralized by mortgage loans being funded and is paid off once the loan is sold to an outside investor or retained within the Bank. Underlying mortgage loans are predominantly originated using the agencies' underwriting standards. The guideline for debt to tangible net worth is 15 to 1. Despite the contraction in warehouse lending which occurred in the first quarter 2017, we are continuing to focus on increasing market share in the warehouse lending market through our strategic initiative to increase lending to customers who originate loans they then sell to outside third party investors. We have a national platform with relationship managers covering both coasts and a large Michigan based sales team. The aggregate committed amount of adjustable-rate warehouse lines of credit granted to other mortgage lenders at March 31, 2017 was $2.5 billion, of which $0.8 billion was outstanding, compared to $2.9 billion at December 31, 2016, of which $1.2 billion was outstanding.

Credit Quality

Management considers a number of qualitative and quantitative factors in assessing the level of our ALLL. For further information see MD&A - Allowance for Loan Losses. As illustrated in the following tables, trends in certain credit quality characteristics such as nonperforming loans and past due statistics remain very strong and continue to show improvement. This is predominantly a result of run-off and sales of legacy portfolios that included nonperforming and TDR loans which have been replaced by new loans with strong credit characteristics.

The following table sets forth certain information about our nonperforming assets as of the end of each of the last five quarters:



	March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016			September 30, 2016			June 30, 2016			March 31, 2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Nonperforming LHFI	$	17		$	22		$	23		$	23		$	27
Nonperforming TDRs	5			8			8			6			6
Nonperforming TDRs at inception but performing for less than six months	6			10			9			15			20
Total nonperforming LHFI (1)	28			40			40			44			53
Real estate and other nonperforming assets, net	13			14			15			19			14
Nonperforming assets held-for-investment, net	$	41		$	54		$	55		$	63		$	67

Nonperforming assets to total assets	0.27		%	0.39		%	0.39		%	0.46		%	0.49		%
Nonperforming LHFI to LHFI	0.47		%	0.67		%	0.63		%	0.76		%	0.95		%
ALLL to LHFI (2)	2.37		%	2.37		%	2.30		%	2.62		%	2.93		%
ALLL to LHFI and loans with government guarantees (2)	2.25		%	2.23		%	2.16		%	2.43		%	2.70		%
Net charge-offs to LHFI ratio (annualized) (2)	0.27		%	0.13		%	0.51		%	0.62		%	0.86		%
Nonperforming assets to LHFI and repossessed assets	0.69		%	0.90		%	0.87		%	1.09		%	1.20		%
Nonperforming assets to Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets) + ALLL (3)	2.90		%	3.93		%	4.03		%	3.79		%	4.15		%


(1)	Does not include nonperforming LHFS of $21 million, $6 million, $5 million, $5 million and $6 million at March 31, 2017, December 31, 2016, September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016 and March 31, 2016, respectively.


(2)	Excludes loans carried under the fair value option.


(3)	Refer to MD&A - Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures for calculation of ratio.

Past due loans held-for-investment

The following table sets forth information regarding past due LHFI at the dates listed:



	30 – 59 Days Past Due		60 – 89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater Past Due (1)		Total Past Due
	(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2017
Consumer Loans
Residential First Mortgage	$	3	$	1	$	26	$	30
Second Mortgage	—		—		1		1
HELOC	1		—		1		2
Other Consumer	—		—		—		—
Total Consumer Loans	$	4	$	1	$	28	$	33
December 31, 2016
Consumer Loans	$	6	$	—	$	29	$	35
Residential First Mortgage	—		1		4		5
Second Mortgage	1		1		7		9
HELOC	1		—		—		1
Total Loans	$	8	$	2	$	40	$	50


(1)	Includes performing nonaccrual loans that are less than 90 days delinquent and for which interest cannot be accrued.

At March 31, 2017, we had $33 million of past due (payment of principal or interest is 30 days past the scheduled payment date) LHFI. Of those past due loans, $28 million loans were nonperforming bringing the level of nonperforming loans at March 31, 2017 to the lowest we’ve reported in over 20 years. At December 31, 2016, we had $50 million of past due LHFI. Of those past due loans, $40 million loans were nonperforming. The decrease from December 31, 2016 to March 31, 2017 was primarily due to improved asset quality and the sale or transfer of nonperforming loans.

Early stage delinquencies remained low with the 30 to 59 days past due loans decreasing to $4 million at March 31, 2017, compared to $8 million at December 31, 2016, primarily driven by improved asset quality growth.

The ratio of nonperforming loans to LHFI decreased to 0.47 percent at March 31, 2017 from 0.67 percent at December 31, 2016.

Consumer loans. As of March 31, 2017, nonperforming consumer loans decreased $12 million from December 31, 2016, primarily due to the sale or transfer of nonperforming loans and the continued improvement in our overall credit quality. Net charge-offs in consumer loans totaled $4 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $12 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016, due to the charge-offs of $1 million and $6 million related to the sale or transfer of loans during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.

Commercial loans. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no nonperforming commercial loans. There were no net charge-offs of commercial loans for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016.

Troubled debt restructurings (held-for-investment)

Troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") are modified loans in which a borrower demonstrates financial difficulties and for which a concession has been granted. The decrease of $26 million in our total TDR loans at March 31, 2017, compared to December 31, 2016 was primarily due to the sale of nonperforming loans during the three months ended March 31, 2017. Nonperforming TDRs were 54.0 percent and 44.2 percent of total nonperforming loans at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Nonperforming TDRs are included in nonaccrual loans. TDRs remain in nonperforming status until a borrower has made at least six consecutive months of payments under the modified terms. Performing TDRs are excluded from nonaccrual loans because it is reasonably assured that all contractual principal and interest due under the restructured terms will be collected. Within consumer nonperforming loans, residential first mortgage TDRs were 65.8 percent of residential first mortgage nonperforming loans at March 31, 2017, compared to 37.4 percent at December 31, 2016.

The following table sets forth a summary of TDRs by performing status and activity during each of the years presented:



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Performing
Beginning balance	$	67		$	101
Additions	1			5
Transfer to nonperforming TDR	(1		)	(2		)
Transfer from nonperforming TDR	—			2
Principal repayments	—			(1		)
Reductions (1)	(19		)	(30		)
Ending balance (2)(3)	$	48		$	75
Nonperforming
Beginning balance	$	18		$	35
Additions	—			4
Transfer from performing TDR	1			2
Transfer to performing TDR	—			(2		)
Principal repayments	—			—
Reductions (1)	(8		)	(13		)
Ending balance (2)(4)	$	11		$	26


(1)	Includes loans paid in full or otherwise settled, sold or charged-off.


(2)	Consumer loans include residential first mortgage, second mortgage, HELOC and other consumer loans. The ALLL on consumer TDR loans totaled $8 million and $9 million at March 31, 2017 and 2016.


(3)	There were no commercial TDRs at March 31, 2017 and 2016.


(4)	There were no commercial TDRs at March 31, 2017.

Allowance for Loan Losses

The ALLL represents management's estimate of probable losses that are inherent in our LHFI portfolio but which have not yet been realized. The consumer loan portfolio includes residential first mortgages, second mortgages, HELOC, and other consumer loans. The commercial loan portfolio includes CRE, C&I and warehouse lending. For further information, see Note 4 - Loans Held-for-Investment.

The ALLL decreased $1 million to $141 million at March 31, 2017, compared to $142 million at December 31, 2016. The decrease from December 31, 2016 was driven by improved asset quality and low sustained levels of charge-offs, partially offset by volume mix, which included growth in commercial loans.

The ALLL as a percentage of LHFI remained at 2.4 percent as of March 31, 2017, no change from 2.4 percent as of December 31, 2016. At March 31, 2017, we had a 2.9 percent allowance coverage of our consumer loan portfolio. The commercial loan ALLL coverage ratio was 1.9 percent at March 31, 2017, reflecting the continued growth in the portfolio, along with the continued strong credit quality.

The following tables set forth certain information regarding the allocation of our ALLL to each loan category:



	March 31, 2017
	Loans Held-for-Investment		Percent of Portfolio		Allowance Amount		Allowance as a Percent of Loan Portfolio
	(Dollars in millions)
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	$	2,456	41.3	%	$	61	2.5	%
Second mortgage	82		1.4	%	7		8.5	%
HELOC	289		4.9	%	14		4.8	%
Other	26		0.5	%	1		3.8	%
Total consumer loans	2,853		48.1	%	83		2.9	%
Commercial loans
Commercial real estate	1,399		23.5	%	32		2.3	%
Commercial and industrial	854		14.3	%	20		2.3	%
Warehouse lending	840		14.1	%	6		0.7	%
Total commercial loans	3,093		51.9	%	58		1.9	%
Total consumer and commercial loans (1)	$	5,946	100.0	%	$	141	2.4	%


(1)	Excludes loans carried under the fair value option.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Beginning balance	$	142		$	187
Provision (benefit) for loan losses	3			(13		)
Charge-offs
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	(4		)	(11		)
Second mortgage	—			(1		)
HELOC	—			(1		)
Other consumer	(1		)	(1		)
Total consumer loans	(5		)	(14		)
Commercial loans
Total commercial loans	—			—
Total charge offs	(5		)	(14		)
Recoveries
Consumer loans
HELOC	—			1
Other consumer	1			1
Total consumer loans	1			2
Commercial loans
Total commercial loans	—			—
Total recoveries	1			2
Charge-offs, net of recoveries	(4		)	(12		)
Ending balance	$	141		$	162
Net charge-off to LHFI ratio (1)	0.27		%	0.86		%
Net charge-off ratio, adjusted (1)(2)	0.07		%	0.20		%


(1)	Excludes loans carried under the fair value option.


(2)	Excludes charge-offs of $1 million and $6 million related to the transfer and subsequent sale of loans during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively. Also excludes charge-offs related to loans with government guarantees of $2 million and $3 million during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.

Market Risk

Market risk is the risk of reduced earnings and or declines in the net market value of the balance sheet primarily due to changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates, or equity prices. We do not have any material foreign currency exchange risk or equity price risk. The primary market risk is interest rate risk and results from timing differences in the repricing of our assets and liabilities, changes in the relationships between rate indices, and the potential exercise of explicit or embedded options.

Interest rate risk is monitored by the ALCO, which is composed of our executive officers and other members of management, in accordance with policies approved by our board of directors. In determining the appropriate level of interest rate risk, the ALCO considers the impact projected interest rate scenarios have on earnings and capital, liquidity, business strategies, and other factors. The ALCO meets monthly or as deemed necessary to review, among other things, the sensitivity of assets and liabilities to interest rate changes, the book and fair values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses, purchase and sale activity, LHFS and commitments to originate loans, and the maturities of investments, borrowings and time deposits.

Financial instruments used to manage interest rate risk include derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and forward sales commitments. For further information, see Note 8 - Derivative Financial Instruments and Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements. All of our derivatives are accounted for at fair market value. All mortgage loan production originated for sale is accounted for on a fair value basis.

To effectively measure and manage interest rate risk, sensitivity analysis is used to determine the impact on earnings and the net market value of the balance sheet across various interest rate scenarios, balance sheet trends, and strategies. From these simulations, interest rate risk is quantified and appropriate strategies are developed and implemented. Additionally, duration and net interest income sensitivity measures are utilized when they provide added value to the overall interest rate risk management process. The overall interest rate risk position and strategies are reviewed by executive management and the board of directors on an ongoing basis. However, management has the latitude to increase interest rate sensitivity within certain limits if, in management's judgment, the increase will enhance profitability.

Net interest income simulation analysis provides estimated net interest income of the current balance sheet across alternative interest rate scenarios. The net interest income analysis measures the sensitivity of interest sensitive earnings over a 12 month time horizon. The analysis holds the current balance sheet values constant and does not take into account management intervention. The net interest income simulation demonstrates the level of interest rate risk inherent in the existing balance sheet.

The following table is a summary of the changes in our net interest income that are projected to result from hypothetical changes in market interest rates. The interest rate scenarios presented in the table include interest rates as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 and rates in those periods adjusted by instantaneous parallel rate changes plus or minus 200 basis points. The minus 200 basis point shock scenario is a flattener scenario as rates are floored at zero given the current interest rate levels.



March 31, 2017
Scenario	Net interest income		$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in millions)
200	$	373	$	13		3.7	%
Constant	359		—			—	%
(200)	301		(58		)	(16.1	)%
December 31, 2016
Scenario	Net interest income		$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in millions)
200	$	321	$	19		6.3	%
Constant	301		—			—	%
(200)	245		(57		)	(18.9	)%

At March 31, 2017, the $58 million increase in the net interest income in the constant scenario as compared to December 31, 2016, was primarily driven by the increased size of balance sheet.

We have also projected the potential impact to net interest income in a hypothetical interest rate scenario as of March 31, 2017. When increasing short-term interest rates instantaneously by 100 basis points and holding the longer term interest rates unchanged, the decrease to net interest income over a 12-month and 24-month period based on our balance sheet as of March 31, 2017 is a loss of $42 million and $52 million, respectively.

In the net interest income simulation, our balance sheet exhibits slight asset sensitivity. When interest rates rise our interest income increases. Conversely when interest rates fall our interest income decreases. The net interest income simulation measures the interest rate risk of the balance sheet over a short period of time, typically 12 months. An additional analysis is completed that measures the interest rate risk over an extended period of time. The EVE analysis provides a fair value of the balance sheet in alternative interest rate scenarios. The EVE analysis does not take into account management intervention and assumes the new rate environment is constant and the change is instantaneous.

The following table is a summary of the changes in our EVE that are projected to result from hypothetical changes in market interest rates. EVE is the market value of assets, less the market value of liabilities, adjusted for the market value of off-balance sheet instruments. The interest rate scenarios presented in the table include interest rates at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and is adjusted by instantaneous parallel rate changes upward to 300 basis points and downward to 100 basis points. The scenarios are not comparable due to differences in the interest rate environments, including the absolute level of rates and the shape of the yield curve. Each rate scenario reflects unique prepayment, repricing, and reinvestment assumptions. Management derives these assumptions by considering published market prepayment expectations, the repricing characteristics of individual instruments or groups of similar instruments, our historical experience, and our asset and liability management strategy. Further, this analysis assumes that certain instruments would not be affected by the changes in interest rates or would be partially affected due to the characteristics of the instruments.

Further, as this framework evaluates risks to the current statement of financial condition only, changes to the volumes and pricing of new business opportunities that can be expected in the different interest rate outcomes are not incorporated in this analytical framework. For instance, analysis of our history suggests that declining interest rate levels are associated with higher loan production volumes at higher levels of profitability. While this "natural business hedge" historically offsets most, if not all, of the identified risks associated with declining interest rate scenarios, these factors fall outside of the EVE framework. Further, there can be no assurance that this natural business hedge would positively affect the EVE in the same manner and to the same extent as in the past.

There are limitations inherent in any methodology used to estimate the exposure to changes in market interest rates. It is not possible to fully model the market risk in instruments with leverage, option, or prepayment risks. Also, we are affected by basis risk, which is the difference in repricing characteristics of similar term rate indices. As such, this analysis is not intended to be a precise forecast of the effect a change in market interest rates would have on us.

If EVE increases in any interest rate scenario, that would indicate an increasing direction for the margin in that hypothetical rate scenario. A perfectly matched balance sheet would possess no change in the EVE, no matter what the rate scenario. The following table presents the EVE in the stated interest rate scenarios:



March 31, 2017										December 31, 2016
Scenario	EVE		EVE%		$ Change			% Change		Scenario	EVE		EVE%		$ Change			% Change
	(Dollars in millions)										(Dollars in millions)
300	$	1,891	12.5	%	$	(139	)	(6.8	)%	300	$	1,927	13.9	%	$	(173	)	(8.2	)%
200	1,961		12.9	%	(69		)	(3.4	)%	200	2,005		14.4	%	(95		)	(4.5	)%
100	2,020		13.3	%	(10		)	(0.5	)%	100	2,073		14.9	%	(28		)	(1.3	)%
Current	2,030		13.4	%	—			—	%	Current	2,100		15.1	%	—			—	%
(100)	1,984		13.1	%	(46		)	(2.3	)%	(100)	2,067		14.9	%	(33		)	(1.6	)%

Our balance sheet exhibits sensitivity in a rising interest rate scenario as the EVE decreases. The decrease in EVE is the result of the amount of liabilities that would be expected to reprice exceeding the amount of assets repriced in the up to 200 scenario. The (100) is a flattener scenario as shorter term rates are unable to decrease 100 basis points due to the absolute level of rates. Therefore, the yields of the longer term variable rate assets decrease by the full 100 basis points, but the liabilities repricing to shorter term rates decrease to less than 100 basis points, leading to a reduction in EVE.

Mortgage Origination

We utilize multiple production channels to originate or acquire mortgage loans on a national scale to generate high returns on equity capital. This helps grow the servicing business and provides stable, low cost funding for the Community Bank segment. We continue to leverage technology to streamline the mortgage origination process, thereby bringing service and convenience to borrowers and correspondents. We also continue to make available to our customers various web-based tools that facilitate the mortgage loan process through each of our production channels. We will continue to seek new ways to expand our relationships with borrowers and correspondents to provide the necessary capital and liquidity to grow mortgage servicing and the Community Bank segment.

We are a leading national originator of mortgage loans based on our residential first mortgage loan originations. The following tables disclose residential first mortgage loan originations by channel, type and mix for each respective period:



	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2017		March 31, 2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Correspondent	$	4,455	$	4,761
Broker	1,041		1,270
Retail	407		312
Total	$	5,903	$	6,343
Purchase originations	$	3,057	$	2,688
Refinance originations	2,846		3,655
Total	$	5,903	$	6,343
Conventional	$	2,959	$	3,799
Government	1,690		1,525
Jumbo	1,254		1,019
Total	$	5,903	$	6,343

Correspondent. In the correspondent channels, an unaffiliated bank or mortgage company completes the loan paperwork and also funds the loan at closing. After the bank or mortgage company has funded the transaction, we purchase the loan at an agreed upon price. We perform a full review of each loan, whether purchased in bulk or not, purchasing only those loans that were originated in accordance with our underwriting guidelines. Correspondents apply to the Bank and may be approved for delegated underwriting authority. Delegate correspondents assume the risks associated with the underwriting of the loan and earn more on loans sold compared to non-delegated correspondents. Non-delegated correspondents earn commissions and administrative fees for closing and funding loans which are then underwritten by the Bank. We have active correspondent relationships with 1,038 companies located in all 50 states, ranking us as the fourth largest correspondent lender.

Broker. In a broker transaction, an unaffiliated mortgage broker completes several steps of the loan origination process including the loan paperwork, but the loans are underwritten by us on a loan-level basis to our underwriting standards and we fund and close the loan in the Bank's name, thereby becoming the lender of record. We are the eighth largest sub-servicer of mortgage loans nationwide with 674 active mortgage broker relationships located in all 50 states.

Retail. In our retail channel, loans are originated through our nationwide network of stand-alone home loan centers. At

March 31, 2017, we maintained 43 retail locations in 23 states. In a direct-to-consumer lending transaction, loans are originated through our Community Bank segment banking centers and from a national direct-to-consumer call center, both of which may leverage our existing customer relationships. When loans are originated on a retail basis, most aspects of the lending process are completed internally, including the origination documentation (inclusive of customer disclosures), as well as the funding of the transactions. Our centralized loan processing provides efficiencies and allows lending sales staff to focus on business development.

The majority of our total loan originations during the year ended March 31, 2017 represented mortgage loans that were collateralized by residential first mortgages on single-family residences and were eligible for sale to the Agencies. In addition, we originate or purchase residential first mortgage loans, other consumer loans, and commercial loans for our LHFI portfolios. Our revenues include noninterest income from sales of residential first mortgages to the Agencies, net interest income, and revenue from servicing of loans for others.

Our Mortgage Origination segment provides us with a large number of customer relationships through our servicing of loans sold to the Agencies and those loans we retain. These relationships, along with our banking customer relationships, provide us an opportunity to cross-sell a full line of consumer financial products which include mortgage refinancing, HELOC, and other consumer loans.

We primarily utilize borrowings from the FHLB to fund our mortgage LHFS and our warehouse lending portfolio. The FHLB provides funding on a fully collateralized basis to us. Our borrowing capacity with the FHLB is a function of the amount of eligible collateral pledged, which includes residential first mortgage loans, home equity lines of credit, commercial real estate loans.

Loans held-for-sale

The majority of our mortgage loans originated as LHFS are sold into the secondary market by securitizing the loans into agency mortgage backed securities or on a whole loan basis. Sales of loans totaled $4.5 billion, or 75.8 percent of originations during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to $6.9 billion, or 109.4 percent of originations during the three months ended March 31, 2016. The decrease in sales volume and percentage of originations during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016, was primarily due to the company slowing deliveries to the Agencies to better optimize profitability. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, turn times on LHFS were an average of 67 days compared to an average of 39 days during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

As of March 31, 2017, we had outstanding commitments to sell $7.0 billion of mortgage loans. Generally, these commitments are funded within 120 days. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, consumer LHFS totaled $4.5 billion and $3.2 billion, respectively, which are primarily residential mortgage loans. For further information on LHFS, see Note 3 - Loans Held-for-Sale.

Mortgage Servicing

We are a top 25 national mortgage servicer. The Mortgage Servicing segment services and subservices mortgage loans for others on a fee for service basis and may also collect ancillary fees and earn income through the use of noninterest bearing escrows. Revenue for those serviced and subserviced loans is earned on a contractual fee basis, with the fees varying based on our responsibilities and the status of the underlying loans. The Mortgage Servicing segment provides servicing of residential mortgages for our own LHFI portfolio in the Community Banking segment for which it earns revenue via an intercompany service fee allocation.

The following table presents the unpaid principal balance (net of write downs) of residential loans serviced and the number of accounts associated with those loans.



	March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
	Amount		Number of accounts	Amount		Number of accounts
	(Dollars in millions)
Residential loan servicing
Serviced for own loan portfolio (1)	$	7,369	33,766	$	5,816	29,244
Serviced for others	26,763		116,965	31,207		133,270
Subserviced for others (2)	48,940		242,445	43,127		220,075
Total residential loans serviced	$	83,072	393,176	$	80,150	382,589


(1)	Includes LHFI (residential first mortgage, second mortgage, and HELOC), LHFS (residential first mortgage), loans with government guarantees and repossessed assets.


(2)	Includes temporary short-term subservicing performed as a result of sales of servicing-released MSRs. Includes repossessed assets.

Mortgage servicing rights

At March 31, 2017, MSRs at fair value decreased $40 million to $295 million, compared to $335 million at December 31, 2016, primarily due to bulk MSR sales of $5.8 billion UPB in underlying loans, partially offset by additions from loan sales where we retained servicing. As of March 31, 2017, we have pending MSR sales with a fair value of $195 million expected to close in the second quarter of 2017.

The principal balance of the loans underlying our total MSRs was $26.8 billion at March 31, 2017, compared to $31.2 billion at December 31, 2016, the decrease is primarily attributable to bulk MSR sales in the first quarter 2017, partially offset by loan sales where we retained servicing.

For further information, see Note 7 - Mortgage Servicing Rights.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the risk that we will not have sufficient funds to meet current and future cash flow needs as they become due. The liquidity of a financial institution reflects our ability to meet loan requests, to accommodate possible outflows in deposits and to take advantage of interest rate and market opportunities. The ability of a financial institution to meet current financial obligations is a function of the balance sheet structure, the ability to liquidate assets, and access to various sources of funds.

We primarily originate agency-eligible LHFS and therefore the majority of new residential first mortgage loan originations are readily convertible to cash, either by selling them as part of our monthly agency sales, private party whole loan sales, or by pledging them to the FHLB of Indianapolis and borrowing against them. We use the FHLB of Indianapolis as a significant source for funding our residential mortgage banking business due to our flexibility in terms of being able to borrow or repay borrowings as daily cash needs require.

We have arrangements with the FRB of Chicago to borrow as appropriate from its discount window. The discount window is a borrowing facility that is intended to be used only for short-term liquidity needs arising from special or unusual circumstances. The amount we are allowed to borrow is based on the lendable value of the collateral that we provide. To collateralize the line, we pledge investment securities and loans that are eligible based on FRB of Chicago guidelines.

The amount we can borrow, or the value we receive for the assets pledged to our liquidity providers, varies based on the amount and type of pledged collateral as well as the perceived market value of the assets and the "haircut" of the market value of the assets. That value is sensitive to the pricing and policies of our liquidity providers and can change with little or no notice.

Our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows shows cash used in operating activities of $5.2 billion and $1.9 billion for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. This primarily reflects our mortgage operations and is a reflection of the manner in which we execute certain loan sales for which the cash outflow is considered an operating activity and the corresponding cash inflow is considered an investing activity. For the period ending March 31, 2017, operating cash flows declined primarily due to our election to extend the amount of time we hold mortgage backed securities related to our LHFS portfolio.

As governed and defined by our internal liquidity policy, we maintain adequate excess liquidity levels appropriate to cover unanticipated liquidity needs. In addition to this liquidity, we also maintain targeted minimum levels of unused collateralized borrowing capacity as another cushion against unexpected liquidity needs. Each business day, we forecast 90 days of daily cash needs. This allows us to determine our projected near term daily cash fluctuations and also to plan and adjust, if necessary, future activities. As a result, in an adverse environment, we would be able to make adjustments to operations as required to meet the liquidity needs of our business, including adjusting deposit rates to increase deposits, planning for additional FHLB borrowings, accelerating sales of LHFS (agencies and/or private), selling LHFI or investment securities, borrowing through the use of repurchase agreements, reducing originations, making changes to warehouse funding facilities, or borrowing from the discount window.

Our liquidity position is continuously monitored and adjustments are made to the balance between sources and uses of funds as deemed appropriate. We balance the liquidity of our loan assets to our available funding sources. Our LHFI portfolio is funded with stable core deposits whereas our warehouse and LHFS may be funded with FHLB borrowings.

Management is not aware of any events that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our liquidity, capital resources or operations.

Parent Company Liquidity

stockholders, capital contributions to the Bank and operating expenses. At March 31, 2017 the Company held $107 million of cash at the Bank.

The OCC regulates all capital distributions made by the Bank, directly or indirectly, to the holding company, including dividend payments. A subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, such as the Bank, must file a notice or application with the OCC at least 30 days prior to each proposed capital distribution. Whether an application is required is based on a number of factors including whether the institution qualifies for expedited treatment under the OCC rules and regulations or if the total amount of all capital distributions (including each proposed capital distribution) for the applicable calendar year exceeds net income for that year to date plus the retained net income for the preceding two years. In addition, as a subsidiary of

a savings and loan holding company, the Bank must receive approval from the FRB before declaring any dividends. Additional restrictions on dividends apply if the Bank fails the QTL test.

For further information and restrictions related to the Bank's payment of dividends, see MD&A - Capital and Regulatory Risk.

Deposits

Our deposits consist of three primary categories: retail deposits, government deposits, and company controlled deposits. The composition of our deposits was as follows:



	March 31, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Balance		Yield/Rate		% of Deposits		Balance		Yield/Rate		% of Deposits
	(Dollars in millions)
Retail deposits
Branch retail deposits
Demand deposit accounts	$	876	0.05	%	10.1	%	$	852	0.05	%	9.7	%
Savings accounts	3,901		0.75	%	45.1	%	3,824		0.77	%	43.5	%
Money market demand accounts	134		0.14	%	1.6	%	138		0.14	%	1.6	%
Certificates of deposit/CDARS (1)	1,083		1.06	%	12.5	%	1,055		1.04	%	12.0	%
Total branch retail deposits	5,994		0.69	%	69.3	%	5,869		0.70	%	66.7	%
Commercial retail deposits
Demand deposit accounts	317		0.16	%	3.7	%	282		0.16	%	3.2	%
Savings accounts	70		0.63	%	0.8	%	63		0.62	%	0.7	%
Money market demand accounts	105		0.76	%	1.2	%	109		0.77	%	1.2	%
Certificates of deposit/CDARS (1)	1		1.59	%	—	%	1		1.58	%	—	%
Total commercial retail deposits	493		0.36	%	5.7	%	455		0.37	%	5.1	%
Total retail deposits	$	6,487	0.67	%	75.0	%	$	6,324	0.67	%	71.9	%
Government deposits
Demand deposit accounts	$	247	0.39	%	2.9	%	$	250	0.39	%	2.8	%
Savings accounts	449		0.52	%	5.2	%	451		0.52	%	5.1	%
Certificates of deposit/CDARS (1)	307		0.80	%	3.6	%	329		0.74	%	3.7	%
Total government deposits (2)	1,003		0.57	%	11.7	%	1,030		0.56	%	11.7	%
Wholesale deposits	10		0.60	%	0.1	%	—		—	%	—	%
Company controlled deposits (3)	1,145		—	%	13.2	%	1,446		—	%	16.4	%
Total deposits (4)	$	8,645	0.57	%	100.0	%	$	8,800	0.55	%	100.0	%


(1)	The aggregate amount of certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of $100,000 was approximately $1 billion at both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.


(2)	Government deposits include funds from municipalities and schools.


(3)	These accounts represent a portion of the investor custodial accounts and escrows controlled by us in connection with loans serviced for others and that have been placed on deposit with the Bank.


(4)	The aggregate amount of deposits with a balance over $250,000 was approximately $3.9 billion and $4.0 billion at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

Total deposits decreased $155 million, or 1.8 percent at March 31, 2017, compared to December 31, 2016, primarily due to a decrease in company controlled deposits.

We continue to focus on increasing our core deposit which includes demand deposits, savings and money market accounts that provides a lower cost funding source to the Bank. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, our core deposits increased $135 million primarily driven by growth in retail savings accounts.

We utilize local governmental agencies, and other public units, as an additional source for deposit funding. As a

Michigan bank, we are not required to hold collateral against our government deposits from Michigan municipalities as they are covered by the Michigan Business and Growth Fund. This results in higher margins earned on these deposits which can be used to fund higher yielding commercial loans. Government deposit accounts include $307 million of certificates of deposit with maturities typically less than one year and $696 million in checking and savings accounts at March 31, 2017.

Company controlled deposits arise due to our servicing or sub-servicing of loans for others and represent the portion of the investor custodial accounts on deposit with the Bank. Certain deposits require us to reimburse the owner for the spread on these funds. This cost is a component of net loan administration income. During the three months ended March 31, 2017, these deposits decreased $301 million, primarily due to timing of seasonal tax payments.

We participate in the CDARS program, through which certain customer CDs are exchanged for CDs of similar amounts from other participating banks. This gives customers the potential to receive FDIC insurance up to $50 million. At March 31, 2017, we had $234 million of total CDs enrolled in the CDARS program. The total CDARS balances increased $3 million at March 31, 2017 from December 31, 2016.

Borrowings

The FHLB provides loans, also referred to as advances, on a fully collateralized basis, to savings banks and other member financial institutions. We are currently authorized through a resolution of our board of directors to apply for advances from the FHLB using approved loan types as collateral. At March 31, 2017, we had the authority and approval from the FHLB to utilize a line of credit of up to $7.0 billion and we may access that line to the extent that collateral is provided. At March 31, 2017, we had $4.4 billion of advances outstanding and an additional $847 million of collateralized borrowing capacity available at the FHLB. At March 31, 2017, we pledged collateral to the Federal Reserve Discount Window amounting to $477 million with a lendable value of $454 million. At December 31, 2016, we pledged collateral to the Federal Reserve Discount Window amounting to $496 million with a lendable value of $474 million. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had no borrowings outstanding against this line of credit.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances. FHLB advances increased $1.4 billion to $4.4 billion at March 31, 2017 from $3.0 billion at December 31, 2016. We rely upon advances from the FHLB as a source of funding for the origination or purchase of loans for sale in the secondary market and for providing duration specific short-term and long-term financing. The outstanding balance of FHLB advances fluctuates from time to time depending on our current inventory of mortgage LHFS and the availability of lower cost funding sources. Our portfolio includes short-term fixed rate advances, long-term LIBOR adjustable advances, and long-term fixed rate advances. Interest rates on the LIBOR index advances reset every three months and the advances may be prepaid without penalty, with notification, at scheduled three-month intervals after an initial 12-month lockout period.

For further information relating to FHLB advances, see Note 9 - Borrowings.

Debt. As part of our overall capital strategy, we previously raised capital through the issuance of junior subordinated notes to our special purpose trusts formed for the offerings, which issued preferred stock (trust preferred securities). The trust preferred securities are callable by us at any time. Interest is payable on a quarterly basis; however, we may defer interest payments for up to 20 quarters without default or penalty.

On July 11, 2016, we issued $250 million of 2021 Senior Notes which mature on July 15, 2021. The proceeds from these notes were used to bring current and redeem our outstanding Series C Preferred Stock.

Prior to June 15, 2021, we may redeem some or all of the 2021 Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100 percent of the aggregate principal amount of the 2021 Senior Notes to be redeemed or the sum of the present values of the remaining scheduled payments plus, in each case, accrued and unpaid interest.

For further information relating to long-term debt, see Note 9 - Borrowings.

Operational Risk

Operational risk is the risk of loss due to human error; inadequate or failed internal systems and controls; violations of, or noncompliance with, laws, rules and regulations, prescribed practices, or ethical standards; and external influences such as market conditions, fraudulent activities, disasters, and security risks. We continuously strive to strengthen our system of internal controls to ensure compliance with laws, rules, and regulations, and to improve the oversight of our operational risk. We evaluate internal systems, processes, and controls to mitigate loss from cyber-attacks and, to date, have not experienced any material losses. The goal of this framework is to implement effective operational risk techniques and strategies, minimize operational and fraud losses, and enhance our overall performance.

Loans with government guarantees

Our loans with government guarantees portfolio totaled $322 million at March 31, 2017. Repossessed assets and the associated claims related to loans with government guarantees recorded in other assets totaled $119 million. At December 31, 2016, our loans with government guarantees portfolio totaled $365 million and repossessed assets and the associated claims related to loans with government guarantees which were recorded in other assets totaled $135 million. The balance of this portfolio decreased at March 31, 2017, primarily due to loans with government guarantees being transferred to LHFS and resold. The decline in repurchased assets and the associated claims related to loans with government guarantees was primarily due to loan liquidations.

Substantially all of these loans continue to be insured or guaranteed by the FHA or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and management believes that the reimbursement process is proceeding appropriately. Nonperforming repurchased loans in this portfolio earn interest at a rate based upon the 10-year U.S. Treasury note rate from the time the underlying loan becomes delinquent, which is not paid by the FHA until claimed. Certain loans within our portfolio may be subject to indemnifications and insurance limits which exposes us to limited credit risk. In the first quarter of 2017, we experienced net charge-offs of $2 million and have reserved for the remaining risks within other assets and as a component of our ALLL on residential first mortgages. These charge-offs arise due to insurance limits on VA insured loans and FHA property foreclosure and preservation requirements that may result in a loss of the guarantee.

For further information, see Note 5 - Loans with Government Guarantees.

Representation and warranty reserve

When we sell mortgage loans, we make customary representations and warranties to the purchasers, including sponsored securitization trusts and their insurers (primarily Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac).

The $4 million benefit from the provision adjustment recorded to representation and warranty reserve expense during the three months ended March 31, 2017, was primarily due to ongoing refinements in our assumptions to reflect repurchase experience related to recent vintages along with reduction in reserve estimates associated with indemnification agreements with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, we had $3 million in Fannie Mae new repurchase demands and $3 million in Freddie Mac new repurchase demands. These amounts are down as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2016 when we had $7 million in Fannie Mae new repurchase demands and $6 million in Freddie Mac new repurchase demands. The total UPB of 2009 and later vintage loans, which are subject to the representation and warranty reserve, sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac was $186 million and $166 million at March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.

For further information on Representation and Warranty Reserve, see Note 10 - Representation and Warranty Reserve.

Capital and Regulatory Risk

Under the OCC's capital distribution regulations, a savings bank that is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company must either notify or seek approval from the OCC of a capital distribution at least 30 days prior to the declaration of a dividend or the approval by the board of directors of the proposed capital distribution. The 30-day period allows the OCC to determine whether the distribution would not be advisable. Also, under Federal Reserve requirements, the Bank must provide a 30-day notice to the Federal Reserve prior to declaring or paying dividends. In addition, under the Supervisory Agreement, the Company agreed to request prior non-objection of the Federal Reserve to pay dividends or other capital distributions. We seek to manage our capital levels and overall business in a manner which we consider to be prudent and work with our regulators to

ensure that our capital levels are appropriate considering our risk profile and evaluation of the capital levels maintained by peer institutions.

In the first quarter 2017, we paid dividends of $48 million from the Bank to the Bancorp. To support the on-going debt service and other Bancorp expenses, we also intend to reduce our Bancorp double leverage and debt to equity ratios to be more consistent with such ratios at other mid-sized banks, which would likely require further dividend payments from the Bank to the Bancorp for the foreseeable future.

Consent Orders

On September 29, 2014, the Bank entered into a Consent Order with the CFPB. The Consent Order relates to alleged violations of federal consumer financial laws arising from the Bank’s residential first mortgage loan loss mitigation practices and default servicing operations dating back to 2011. Under the terms of the Consent Order, the Bank paid $28 million for borrower remediation and $10 million in civil money penalties. The settlement does not involve any admission of wrongdoing on the part of the Bank or our employees, directors, officers, or agents. For further information and a complete description of all of the terms of the Consent Order, please refer to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2014.

Supervisory Agreement

On January 28, 2010, we became subject to the Supervisory Agreement, which will remain in effect until terminated, modified, or suspended in writing by the Federal Reserve. The failure to comply with the Supervisory Agreement could result in the initiation of further enforcement action by the Federal Reserve, including the imposition of further operating restrictions, and could result in additional enforcement actions against us. We have taken actions which we believe are appropriate to comply with, and intend to maintain compliance with, all of the requirements of the Supervisory Agreement. For further information and a complete description of all of the terms of the Supervisory Agreement, please refer to the copy of the Supervisory Agreement filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2010 and as an exhibit to our 2016 Form 10-K filed on March 13, 2017.

Department of Justice Settlement Agreement

On February 24, 2012, the Bank entered into a Settlement Agreement with the DOJ under which we made an initial payment of $15 million and agreed to make future payments totaling $118 million in annual increments of up to $25 million upon meeting all of the following conditions which are evaluated quarterly and include: (a) the reversal of the DTA valuation allowance, which occurred at the end of 2013; (b) the repayment of the Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (the "TARP Preferred"), which occurred in July 2016; and (c) our Bank has a Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio of 11 percent or greater. Additionally, if the Bank or Bancorp become party to a business combination in which the Bank and Bancorp represent less than 33.3 percent of the resulting company’s assets, annual payments would commence twelve months after the date of that business combination. Further, should all conditions for payment be satisfied, an annual payment under the settlement agreement would be made, and any further payments would be made only so long as such conditions are satisfied at the time required for such further payments.

Within six months of satisfying the conditions specified above, the Bank would make an additional payment, to occur no more frequently than annually, provided that doing so would not violate any material banking regulatory requirement or the OCC does not object in writing. Consistent with our business and regulatory requirements, Flagstar shall seek in good faith to fulfill the conditions, and will not undertake any conduct or fail to take any action the purpose of which is to frustrate or delay our ability to fulfill any of the conditions.

Future annual payments of $25 million or the final payment of the remaining balance under the Settlement Agreement could be required if the Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of the Bank meets or exceeds 11 percent. The combination of (a) future dividends from the Bank to Bancorp and (b) continued growth in earning assets at the Bank are expected to continue to limit the growth rate of the Bank’s Tier 1 Leverage Ratio, which could have an impact on the timing of expected cash flows under the Settlement Agreement.

The Settlement Agreement meets the definition of a financial instrument for which we elected the fair value option. The fair value of the liability is subject to significant uncertainty and is impacted by forecasted estimates of equity, earnings, timing and amount of dividends and growth of the balance sheet and their related impacts on forecasted Tier 1 Capital. We consider the assumptions a market participant would make to transfer the liability and evaluate multiple possible outcomes and our estimates of the likelihood of these outcomes, which may change over time.

Regulatory Capital Composition - Transition

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, we must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. We are currently subject to regulatory capital rules issued by U.S. banking regulators.

Effective January 1, 2015, we became subject to the Basel III rules, which include certain transition provisions. Capital deductions to the Company's MSRs and deferred tax assets are recognized in 20 percent annual increments, and will be fully recognized as of January 1, 2018. When presented on a fully phased-in basis, capital, risk-weighted assets, and the capital ratios assume all regulatory capital adjustments and deductions are fully recognized. At March 31, 2017, the Company and the Bank were subject to the transitional phase-in limitation on deductions related to MSRs and certain deferred tax assets. The annual incremental change in the deductions due to the increase in the transitional phase-in from 60 percent in 2016 to 80 percent in 2017 reduced our regulatory capital ratios. These transitional phase in amounts increase to 100 percent in 2018.

Effective January 1, 2016, we became subject to the capital conservation buffer under the Basel III rules, subjecting a banking organization to certain limitations on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers if the organization does not maintain a capital conservation buffer above the minimum risk based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer for 2017 must be greater than 1.25 percent in order to not be subject to limitations. The Company and the Bank had a capital conservation buffer of 7.8 percent and 10.2 percent, respectively as of March 31, 2017. When fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, the capital conservation buffer must be greater than 2.5 percent.

Dodd-Frank Act Section 171, commonly known as the Collins Amendment, grandfathered the regulatory treatment of hybrid securities, such as trust preferred securities issued prior to May 9, 2010, for banks or holding companies with less than $15 billion in total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2009.

At March 31, 2017, we were considered "well-capitalized" for regulatory purposes. The following tables show the regulatory capital ratios as of the dates indicated:



	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in millions)
Bancorp
Tier 1 leverage (to adjusted tangible assets)	$	1,277	9.31	%	$	1,256	8.88	%
Total adjusted tangible asset base (1)	13,716				14,149
Tier 1 capital (to RWA)	$	1,277	14.70	%	$	1,256	15.12	%
Common equity Tier 1 (to RWA)	1,071		12.32	%	1,084		13.06	%
Total risk-based capital (to RWA)	1,389		15.98	%	1,363		16.41	%
Risk-weighted asset base (1)	$	8,689			$	8,305



	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in millions)
Bank
Tier 1 leverage (to adjusted tangible assets)	$	1,477	10.74	%	$	1,491	10.52	%
Total adjusted tangible asset base (1)	13,754				14,177
Tier 1 capital (to RWA)	$	1,477	16.93	%	$	1,491	17.90	%
Common equity Tier 1 (to RWA)	1,477		16.93	%	1,491		17.90	%
Total risk-based capital (to RWA)	1,588		18.20	%	1,598		19.18	%
Risk-weighted asset base (1)	$	8,726			$	8,332


(1)	Based on adjusted total assets for purposes of Tier 1 leverage capital and risk-weighted assets for purposes Tier 1, common equity Tier 1, and total risk-based capital.

Our Tier 1 leverage ratio increased at March 31, 2017, compared to December 31, 2016, primarily as a result of earnings offset by an increase in the deductions related to DTAs and MSRs due to the change in transitional phase-in limitation from 60 percent at December 31, 2016 to 80 percent at March 31, 2017.

Banks with assets greater than $10 billion are required to submit a DFAST under the final rules established by their primary regulator. DFAST requires banks to project results over a nine-quarter planning horizon under three scenarios (baseline, adverse, and severely adverse) published by the Federal Reserve and to show that the bank would exceed regulatory minimum capital standards for the Tier 1 leverage ratio, Tier 1 common ratio, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and the Total risk-based capital ratio under all of these scenarios. We are not subject to the Federal Reserve’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review program.

Certain regulatory capital ratios for the Bank and the Company are shown in the following table:



	Regulatory Minimums		Regulatory Minimums to be Well-Capitalized		Bank		Bancorp
March 31, 2017
Basel III Ratios (transitional)
Common equity Tier I capital ratio	4.50	%	6.50	%	16.93	%	12.32	%
Tier I leverage ratio	4.00	%	5.00	%	10.74	%	9.31	%
Basel III Ratios (fully phased-in) (1)
Common equity Tier I capital ratio	4.50	%	6.50	%	15.77	%	10.79	%
Tier I leverage ratio	4.00	%	5.00	%	10.35	%	8.75	%


(1)	Refer to MD&A - Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures.

The impact under the fully phased in Basel III rules to our Tier 1 leverage ratio is mostly driven by the treatment that MSRs receive under Basel III. Once fully phased in, the Basel III capital rules will significantly reduce the allowable amount of the fair value of MSRs included in Tier 1 capital. At March 31, 2017, we had $295 million of MSRs, representing 23.1 percent of Tier 1 capital. Our ratio of MSRs to Tier 1 capital was 26.7 percent at December 31, 2016. Over the long term, we plan to continue to reduce our MSRs to Tier 1 ratio, taking into consideration market conditions to guide our pace of MSR reduction.

Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

In addition to results presented in accordance with GAAP, this report includes non-GAAP financial measures such as the estimated fully implemented Basel III capital levels and ratios. We believe these non-GAAP financial measures provide additional information that is useful to investors in helping to understand the underlying performance and trends of the Company.

Non-GAAP financial measures have inherent limitations, which are not required to be uniformly applied and are not audited. Readers should be aware of these limitations and should be cautious with respect to the use of such measures. To mitigate these limitations, we have practices in place to ensure that these measures are calculated using the appropriate GAAP or regulatory components in their entirety and to ensure that our performance is properly reflected to facilitate consistent period-to-period comparisons. Our method of calculating these non-GAAP measures may differ from methods used by other companies. Although we believe the non-GAAP financial measures disclosed in this report enhance investors' understanding of our business and performance, these non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation, or as a substitute for those financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Where non-GAAP financial measures are used, the most directly comparable GAAP or regulatory financial measure, as well as the reconciliation to the most directly comparable GAAP or regulatory financial measure, can be found in this report.

Nonperforming assets / Tier 1 + Allowance for Loan Losses. The ratio of nonperforming assets to Tier 1 and ALLL divides the total level of nonperforming LHFI assets by Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets), as defined by bank regulations, plus ALLL. We believe these measurements are meaningful measures of capital adequacy used by investors, regulators, management and others to evaluate the adequacy of capital in comparison to other companies within the industry.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Nonperforming assets / Tier 1 capital + ALLL
Nonperforming assets	$	41		$	67
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted total assets)	1,277			1,453
Allowance for loan losses	141			162
Tier 1 capital + ALLL	$	1,418		$	1,615
Nonperforming assets / Tier 1 capital + ALLL	2.90		%	4.15		%

Basel III (transitional) to Basel III (fully phased-in) reconciliation. On January 1, 2015, the Basel III rules became effective, subject to transition provisions primarily related to regulatory deductions and adjustments impacting common equity Tier 1 capital and Tier 1 capital. When fully phased-in, Basel III, will increase capital requirements through higher minimum capital levels as well as through increases in risk-weights for certain exposures. Additionally, the final Basel III rules place greater emphasis on common equity. In October 2013, the OCC and Federal Reserve released final rules detailing the U.S. implementation of Basel III and the application of the risk-based and leverage capital rules to top-tier savings and loan holding companies. We have transitioned to the Basel III framework beginning in January 2015 and are subject to a phase-in period extending through 2018. Accordingly, the calculations provided below and on the previous page, are estimates. These measures are considered to be non-GAAP financial measures because they are not formally defined by GAAP and the Basel III implementation regulations. The Common Equity Tier 1, Tier 1, Total Capital and Leverage ratios will not be fully phased-in until January 1, 2018 and the Capital Conservation buffer will not be fully phased-in until January 1, 2019. The regulations are subject to change as clarifying guidance becomes available and the calculations currently include our interpretations of the requirements including informal feedback received through the regulatory process. Other entities may calculate the Basel III ratios differently from ours based on their interpretation of the guidelines. Since analysts and banking regulators may assess our capital adequacy using the Basel III framework, we believe that it is useful to provide investors information enabling them to assess our capital adequacy on the same basis.



	Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)			Tier 1 Leverage (to Adjusted Tangible Assets)			Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets			Total Risk-Based Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets)
	(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2017
Flagstar Bancorp
Regulatory capital – Basel III (transitional) to Basel III (fully phased-in)
Basel III (transitional)	$	1,071		$	1,277		$	1,277		$	1,389
Increased deductions related to deferred tax assets, MSRs, and other capital components	(119		)	(85		)	(85		)	(83		)
Basel III (fully phased-in) capital	$	952		$	1,192		$	1,192		$	1,306
Risk-weighted assets – Basel III (transitional) to Basel III (fully phased-in)
Basel III assets (transitional)	$	8,689		$	13,716		$	8,689		$	8,689
Net change in assets	131			(85		)	131			131
Basel III (fully phased-in) assets	$	8,820		$	13,631		$	8,820		$	8,820
Capital ratios
Basel III (transitional)	12.32		%	9.31		%	14.70		%	15.98		%
Basel III (fully phased-in)	10.79		%	8.75		%	13.52		%	14.81		%



	Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)			Tier 1 Leverage (to Adjusted Tangible Assets)			Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets			Total Risk-Based Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
	(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2017
Flagstar Bank
Regulatory capital – Basel III (transitional) to Basel III (fully phased-in)
Basel III (transitional)	$	1,477		$	1,477		$	1,477		$	1,588
Increased deductions related to deferred tax assets, MSRs, and other capital components	(60		)	(60		)	(60		)	(56		)
Basel III (fully phased-in) capital	$	1,417		$	1,417		$	1,417		$	1,532
Risk-weighted assets – Basel III (transitional) to Basel III (fully phased-in)
Basel III assets (transitional)	$	8,726		$	13,754		$	8,726		$	8,726
Net change in assets	262			(60		)	262			262
Basel III (fully phased-in) assets	$	8,988		$	13,694		$	8,988		$	8,988
Capital ratios
Basel III (transitional)	16.93		%	10.74		%	16.93		%	18.20		%
Basel III (fully phased-in)	15.77		%	10.35		%	15.77		%	17.04		%

Critical Accounting Estimates

Various elements of our accounting policies, by their nature, are subject to estimation techniques, valuation assumptions and other subjective assessments. Certain accounting policies that, due to the judgment, estimates and assumptions in those policies are critical to an understanding of our Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements herein. These policies relate to: (a) the determination of our ALLL; and (b) fair value measurements. We believe the judgment, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes, in Item 1, are appropriate given the factual circumstances at the time. However, given the sensitivity of our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes, in Item 1, herein, to these critical accounting policies, the use of other judgments, estimates and assumptions could result in material differences in our results of operations and/or financial condition. For further information on our critical accounting policies, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, which is available on our website, flagstar.com, under the Investor Relations section, or on the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission, at sec.gov.

FORWARD – LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to statements included within the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. In addition, Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. may make forward-looking statements in our other documents filed with or furnished to the SEC, and our management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others.

Generally, forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent management’s beliefs regarding future events. Such statements may be identified by words such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, plan, estimate, may increase, may fluctuate, and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as will, should, would and could. Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Actual results and capital and other financial conditions may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors, including without limitation the precautionary statements included within each individual business’ discussion and analysis of our results of operations and the risk factors listed and described in Item 1A to Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and Item 1A to Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which are incorporated by reference herein, for further information on these and other factors affecting us.

Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. speak only as to the date they are made, and we do not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statements were made.

Item 1. Financial Statements

Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition

(In millions, except share data)


	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			March 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
	(Unaudited)						(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Assets
Cash	$	76		$	54		$	72		$	84
Interest-earning deposits	98			154			89			74
Total cash and cash equivalents	174			208			161			158
Investment securities available-for-sale	1,115			1,294			1,650			1,480
Investment securities held-to-maturity	1,156			1,268			1,048			1,093
Loans held-for-sale ($3,352 and $2,541 measured at fair value, respectively)	3,393			2,576
Loans held-for-investment ($80 and $111 measured at fair value, respectively)	6,290			6,352
Loans held-for-sale ($4,511 and $3,145 measured at fair value, respectively)							4,543			3,177
Loans held-for-investment ($13 and $72 measured at fair value, respectively)							5,959			6,065
Loans with government guarantees	404			485			322			365
Less: allowance for loan losses	(143		)	(187		)	(141		)	(142		)
Total loans held-for-investment and loans with government guarantees, net	6,551			6,650			6,140			6,288
Mortgage servicing rights	302			296			295			335
Net deferred tax asset							273			286
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	172			170			201			180
Premises and equipment, net	271			250			277			275
Net deferred tax asset	305			364
Other assets	834			639			773			781
Total assets	$	14,273		$	13,715		$	15,361		$	14,053
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Noninterest bearing deposits	$	2,544		$	1,574		$	1,831		$	2,077
Interest bearing deposits	6,827			6,361			6,814			6,723
Total deposits	9,371			7,935			8,645			8,800
Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other	905			2,116
Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances							3,186			1,780
Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances	1,577			1,425			1,200			1,200
Other long-term debt	493			247			493			493
Representation and warranty reserve	32			40			23			27
Other liabilities ($60 and $84 measured at fair value, respectively)	609			423
Other liabilities ($60 and $60 measured at fair value, respectively)							443			417
Total liabilities	12,987			12,186			13,990			12,717
Stockholders’ Equity
Preferred stock $0.01 par value, liquidation value $1,000 per share, 25,000,000 shares authorized; 0 and 266,657 issued and outstanding, respectively	—			267
Common stock $0.01 par value, 70,000,000 shares authorized; 56,597,271 and 56,483,258 shares issued and outstanding, respectively	1			1
Common stock $0.01 par value, 70,000,000 shares authorized; 57,043,565 and 56,824,802 shares issued and outstanding, respectively							1			1
Additional paid in capital	1,494			1,486			1,510			1,503
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income	(20		)	2			(6		)	(7		)
Accumulated deficit	(189		)	(227		)	(134		)	(161		)
Total stockholders’ equity	1,286			1,529			1,371			1,336
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	14,273		$	13,715		$	15,361		$	14,053

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (In millions, except per share data)	Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (In millions, except per share data)												Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (In millions, except per share data)

													Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						2017		2016
	2016			2015			2016			2015			(Unaudited)
Interest Income	(Unaudited)
Loans	$	90		$	77		$	256		$	216		$	91	$	84
Investment securities	16			14			50			43			19		17
Interest-earning deposits and other	—			—			—			1
Total interest income	106			91			306			260			110		101
Interest Expense
Deposits	12			10			34			30			12		11
Short-term debt	1			2			4			2
Long-term debt	7			4			22			11
Other debt	6			2			10			6
Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other													3		2
Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances													6		7
Other long-term debt													6		2
Total interest expense	26			18			70			49			27		22
Net interest income	80			73			236			211			83		79
Provision (benefit) for loan losses	7			(1		)	(9		)	(18		)	3		(13		)
Net interest income after provision (benefit) for loan losses	73			74			245			229			80		92
Noninterest Income
Net gain on loan sales	94			68			259			242			48		75
Loan fees and charges	22			17			56			53			15		15
Deposit fees and charges	5			7			17			19			4		6
Loan administration income	4			8			14			19			5		6
Net (loss) return on mortgage servicing rights	(11		)	12			(21		)	19
Net (loss) gain on sale of assets	—			1			(2		)	(1		)
Representation and warranty benefit	6			6			12			13
Net return (loss) on mortgage servicing rights													14		(6		)
Representation and warranty (provision) benefit													4		2
Other noninterest income	36			9			54			9			10		7
Total noninterest income	156			128			389			373			100		105
Noninterest Expense
Compensation and benefits	69			58			203			178			72		68
Commissions	16			10			40			31			10		10
Occupancy and equipment	21			20			64			60			22		22
Asset resolution	2			—			6			13
Federal insurance premiums	3			6			9			18
Loan processing expense	13			14			40			40			12		12
Legal and professional expense	5			10			20			27			7		9
Other noninterest expense	13			13			36			40			17		16
Total noninterest expense	142			131			418			407			140		137
Income before income taxes	87			71			216			195			40		60
Provision for income taxes	30			24			73			70
Provision (benefit) for income taxes													13		21
Net income	$	57		$	47		$	143		$	125		$	27	$	39
Income per share
Net income per share
Basic	$	0.98		$	0.70		$	2.21		$	1.82		$	0.47	$	0.56
Diluted	$	0.96		$	0.69		$	2.16		$	1.80		$	0.46	$	0.54
Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic	56,580,238			56,436,026			56,556,188			56,419,354			56,921,605		56,513,715
Diluted	57,933,806			57,207,503			57,727,262			57,050,789			58,072,563		57,600,984

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In millions)

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
(Unaudited)
Net income $ 57
$ 47
$ 143
$ 125
Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Investment securities
Unrealized gain (loss) (net of tax effect $1, ($5), ($10) and ($5), respectively) (1 ) 9
17
9
Less: Reclassification of net (gain) on sale (net of tax effect $2, $0, $3 and $0, respectively) (3 ) —
(5 ) —
Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities, net of tax (4 ) 9
12
9
Derivatives and hedging activities
Unrealized gain (loss) (net of tax effect $0, $2, $23 and $2, respectively) —
(5 ) (44 ) (5 )
Less: Reclassification of net loss (gain) on derivative instruments (net of tax effect ($2), $0, ($6) and $0, respectively) 3
—
10
—
Net change in derivatives and hedging activities, net of tax 3
(5 ) (34 ) (5 )
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax (1 ) 4
(22 ) 4
Comprehensive income $ 56
$ 51
$ 121
$ 129



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
	(Unaudited)
Net income	$	27	$	39
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
Investment securities	—		15
Derivatives and hedging activities	1		(28		)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax	1		(13		)
Comprehensive income	$	28	$	26

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(In millions, except share data)


	Preferred Stock					Common Stock														Preferred Stock			Common Stock
	Number of Shares Outstanding		Amount of Preferred Stock			Number of Shares Outstanding	Amount of Common Stock		Additional Paid in Capital		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)			Total Stockholders’ Equity			Number of Shares Outstanding	Amount of Preferred Stock		Number of Shares Outstanding	Amount of Common Stock		Additional Paid in Capital		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)			Total Stockholders’ Equity
Balance at December 31, 2014	266,657		$	267		56,332,307	$	1	$	1,482	$	8		$	(385	)	$	1,373
(Unaudited)
Net income	—		—			—	—		—		—			125			125
Total other comprehensive income	—		—			—	—		—		4			—			4
Stock-based compensation	—		—			103,719	—		2		—			—			2
Balance at September 30, 2015	266,657		$	267		56,436,026	$	1	$	1,484	$	12		$	(260	)	$	1,504
Balance at December 31, 2015	266,657		$	267		56,483,258	$	1	$	1,486	$	2		$	(227	)	$	1,529		266,657	$	267	56,483,258	$	1	$	1,486	$	2		$	(227	)	$	1,529
(Unaudited)
Net income	—		—			—	—		—		—			143			143			—	—		—	—		—		—			39			39
Total other comprehensive loss	—		—			—	—		—		(22		)	—			(22		)
Preferred stock redemption	(266,657	)	(267		)	—	—		—		—			—			(267		)
Dividends on preferred stock	—		—			—	—		—		—			(105		)	(105		)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)																				—	—		—	—		—		(13		)	—			(13		)
Stock-based compensation	—		—			114,013	—		8		—			—			8			—	—		74,637	—		3		—			—			3
Balance at September 30, 2016	—		$	—		56,597,271	$	1	$	1,494	$	(20	)	$	(189	)	$	1,286
Balance at March 31, 2016																				266,657	$	267	56,557,895	$	1	$	1,489	$	(11	)	$	(188	)	$	1,558
Balance at December 31, 2016																				—	$	—	56,824,802	$	1	$	1,503	$	(7	)	$	(161	)	$	1,336
(Unaudited)
Net income																				—	—		—	—		—		—			27			27
Total other comprehensive income (loss)																				—	—		—	—		—		1			—			1
Warrant exercise																				—	—		154,313	—		4		—			—			4
Stock-based compensation																				—	—		64,450	—		3		—			—			3
Balance at March 31, 2017																				—	$	—	57,043,565	$	1	$	1,510	$	(6	)	$	(134	)	$	1,371

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015
(Unaudited)
Operating Activities
Net income $ 143
$ 125
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:
(Benefit) provision for loan losses (9 ) (18 )
Representation and warranty (benefit) provision (12 ) (13 )
Depreciation and amortization 24
17
Deferred income taxes 59
68
Net gain on loan and asset sales (257 ) (241 )
Change in fair value and other non-cash changes (268 ) (231 )
Proceeds from sales of loans held-for-sale ("HFS") 14,097
15,247
Origination, premium paid and purchase of loans, net of principal repayments (23,826 ) (22,180 )
Decrease (increase) in accrued interest receivable 1
(6 )
(Increase) decrease in other assets, excluding purchase of other investments (104 ) 155
Increase in other liabilities 24
10
Net cash used in operating activities (10,128 ) (7,067 )
Investing Activities
Proceeds from sale of available for sale securities including loans that have been securitized 10,876
6,603
Collection of principal on investment securities available-for-sale ("AFS") 116
185
Purchase of investment securities available-for-sale and other (203 ) (783 )
Collection of principal on investment securities held-to-maturity ("HTM") 126
38
Purchase of investment securities HTM (15 ) (10 )
Proceeds received from the sale of held-for-investment loans ("HFI") 228
788
Origination and purchase of loans HFI, net of principal repayments (1,297 ) (2,249 )
Purchase of bank owned life insurance (85 ) (175 )
Proceeds from the disposition of repossessed assets 14
19
Net (purchase) redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank stock (2 ) 42
Acquisitions of premises and equipment, net of proceeds (44 ) (28 )
Proceeds from the sale of mortgage servicing rights 35
183
Net cash provided by investing activities 9,749
4,613
Financing Activities
Net increase in deposit accounts 1,436
1,068
Net change in short-term FHLB borrowings and other short-term debt (1,211 ) —
Proceeds from long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other debt 395
22,235
Repayment of long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances —
(20,725 )
Repayment of long-term debt —
(55 )
Net receipt (disbursement) of payments of loans serviced for others 91
(23 )
Preferred stock dividends (105 ) —
Redemption of preferred stock (267 ) —
Net receipt of escrow payments 6
13
Net cash provided by financing activities 345
2,513
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents (34 ) 59
Beginning cash and cash equivalents 208
136
Ending cash and cash equivalents $ 174
$ 195
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Interest paid on deposits and other borrowings $ 89
$ 42
Income tax payments $ 3
$ 3
Non-cash reclassification of investment securities AFS to HTM $ —
$ 1,136
Non-cash reclassification of loans originated HFI to loans HFS $ 1,331
$ 1,113
Non-cash reclassification of mortgage loans originated HFS to HFI $ 2
$ 30
Non-cash reclassification of mortgage loans HFS to AFS securities $ 10,588
$ 6,617
Mortgage servicing rights resulting from sale or securitization of loans $ 173
$ 220
Non-cash reclassification of loans with government guarantee to other assets $ —
$ 373

Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (In millions)

	Three Months Ended
	2017			2016
	(Unaudited)
Operating Activities
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(5,224	)	$	(1,874	)
Investing Activities
Proceeds from sale of AFS securities including loans that have been securitized	$	3,973		$	2,672
Collection of principal on investment securities AFS	52			30
Purchase of investment securities AFS and other	(214		)	(27		)
Collection of principal on investment securities HTM	45			30
Purchase of investment securities HTM and other	—			(15		)
Proceeds received from the sale of LHFI	34			75
Net Origination, purchase, and principal repayments of LFFI	14			(188		)
Purchase of bank owned life insurance	—			(85		)
Net purchase of FHLB stock	(21		)	(2		)
Acquisition of premises and equipment, net of proceeds	(17		)	(12		)
Proceeds from the sale of MSRs	50			1
Other, net	(47		)	5
Net cash provided by investing activities	$	3,869		$	2,484
Financing Activities
Net change in deposit accounts	$	(155	)	$	534
Net change in short term FHLB borrowings and other short term debt	1,406			(866		)
Proceeds from long term FHLB Advances	—			200
Net receipt of payments of loans serviced for others	100			44
Net receipt (disbursement) of escrow payments	7			(6		)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities	$	1,358		$	(94	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	3			516
Beginning cash and cash equivalents	158			208
Ending cash and cash equivalents	$	161		$	724
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Non-cash reclassification of loans originated LHFI to LHFS	$	106		$	901
Non-cash reclassification of LHFS to AFS securities	$	3,973		$	2,672
MSRs resulting from sale or securitization of loans	$	21		$	57
Operating section supplemental disclosures
Cash proceeds from sales of LHFS	$	610		$	4,585
Origination, premium paid and purchase of LHFS, net of principal repayments	$	(5,768	)	$	(6,304	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1 –- Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements of Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. ("Flagstar," or the "Company"), including its wholly owned principal subsidiary, Flagstar Bank, FSB (the "Bank"), have been prepared using U.S. generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") for interim financial statements. Where we say "we," "us," "our," the "Company" or ~~"our,~~"Flagstar," we usually mean Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. However, in some cases, a reference to "we," "us," "our," the "Company" or ~~"our"~~"Flagstar" will include our ~~wholly owned~~wholly-owned subsidiary Flagstar Bank, FSB (the "Bank").

These consolidated financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by GAAP for a full year presentation and certain disclosures have been condensed or omitted in accordance with rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). These interim financial statements are unaudited and include, in our opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods indicated, which are not necessarily indicative of results which may be expected for the full year. These consolidated financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, which is available on our website, at flagstar.com, and on the SEC website, at sec.gov. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Subsequent to March 31, 2017, we have entered into pending bulk sales of $195 million of mortgage servicing rights. The servicing of these loans will be retained on approximately 80 percent of the total MSR sale amount. We do not expect any material adverse impact to the Consolidated Statement of Operations resulting from these sales.

Note 2 –- Investment Securities

As of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016, investment securities were comprised of the following:


	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
	(Dollars in millions)									(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2016
March 31, 2017
Available-for-sale securities
Agency - Commercial										$	535	$	2	$	(5	)	$	532
Agency - Residential										1,077		1		(15		)	1,063
Municipal obligations										36		—		—			36
Corporate debt obligations										19		—		—			19
Total available-for-sale securities (1)										$	1,667	$	3	$	(20	)	$	1,650
Held-to-maturity securities
Agency - Commercial										$	573	$	1	$	(6	)	$	568
Agency - Residential										475		—		(5		)	470
Total held-to-maturity securities (1)										$	1,048	$	1	$	(11	)	$	1,038
December 31, 2016
Available-for-sale securities
Agency - Commercial	$	500	$	10	$	—		$	510	$	551	$	2	$	(5	)	$	548
Agency - Residential	563		10		—			573		913		1		(16		)	898
Municipal obligations	32		—		—			32		34		—		—			34
Total available-for-sale securities (1)	$	1,095	$	20	$	—		$	1,115	$	1,498	$	3	$	(21	)	$	1,480
Held-to-maturity securities
Agency - Commercial	$	619	$	9	$	—		$	628	$	595	$	—	$	(6	)	$	589
Agency - Residential	537		12		—			549		498		1		(4		)	495
Total held-to-maturity securities (1)	$	1,156	$	21	$	—		$	1,177	$	1,093	$	1	$	(10	)	$	1,084
December 31, 2015
Available-for-sale securities
Agency - Commercial	$	766	$	3	$	(3	)	$	766
Agency - Residential	514		2		(2		)	514
Municipal obligations	14		—		—			14
Total available-for-sale securities (1)	$	1,294	$	5	$	(5	)	$	1,294
Held-to-maturity securities
Agency - Commercial	$	634	$	—	$	(2	)	$	632
Agency - Residential	634		—		(4		)	630
Total held-to-maturity securities (1)	$	1,268	$	—	$	(6	)	$	1,262


(1)	There were no securities of a single issuer, which are not governmental or government-sponsored, that exceeded 10 percent of stockholders’ equity at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 or December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

~~Credit related declines in the available-for-sale~~We evaluate AFS and ~~held-to-maturity~~HTM investment securities ~~that are determined to be~~for other than temporary ~~are reported as~~impairment on a ~~separate component of noninterest income within the Consolidated Statement of Operations.~~quarterly basis. An ~~impaired investment security~~OTTI is considered to ~~be other than temporary if~~have occurred when the fair value of a debt security is below its amortized costs and we (1) ~~we intend~~have the intent to sell the ~~security;~~security, (2) ~~it is~~will more likely than not ~~we will~~ be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost, ~~basis;~~ or (3) ~~the present value of expected cash flows is~~do not ~~sufficient~~expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security. Investments that have an OTTI are written down through a charge to earnings for the amount representing the credit loss on the security. Gains and losses related to all ~~contractually required principal and interest payments.~~

~~We evaluate our securities portfolio each quarter to determine if any security is considered to be~~ other ~~than temporarily impaired. In making this evaluation, management considers its ability and intent to hold securities to recover current market losses.~~factors are recognized in other comprehensive income (loss). During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, ~~and September 30, 2015,~~ we had no ~~other than temporary impairments.~~OTTI losses.

Available-for-sale securities

Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value, with unrealized gains and ~~unrealized~~ losses, to the extent they are temporary in nature, reported as a component of other comprehensive income.

We purchased ~~$136 million and $203~~$222 million of ~~available-for-sale~~AFS securities, which included U.S. government sponsored agency ~~mortgage-backed securities~~MBS, corporate debt obligations, and municipal obligations during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2016, respectively.~~March 31, 2017. We purchased ~~$59 million and $783~~$27 million of ~~available-for-sale~~AFS securities, which included U.S. government sponsored agencies comprised of ~~mortgage-backed securities, collateralized mortgage~~MBS and municipal obligations during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2015, respectively. During the third quarter 2015, we subsequently transferred $462 million of the securities purchased to held-to-maturity investments.~~March 31, 2016.

Gains (losses) on sales of ~~available-for-sale~~AFS securities are reported in other noninterest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, there were $115 million and $290 million, respectively, in sales of available-for-sale securities, which did not include those related to mortgage loans that had been securitized for sale in the normal course of business. These sales resulted in a realized gain of $3 million and $4 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively. During both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 thereThere were no sales of ~~available-for-sale~~AFS securities during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, except those related to mortgage loans that had been securitized for sale in the normal course of business.

Held-to-maturity securities

Investment securities ~~held-to-maturity~~HTM are carried at amortized cost and adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts using the interest method. Unrealized losses are not recorded to the extent they are temporary in nature.

Transfers of investment securities into the ~~held-to-maturity~~HTM category from the ~~available-for-sale~~AFS category are accounted for at fair value on the date of transfer. ~~The related unrealized gain, net~~There were no such transfers during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016.

There were no purchases of ~~tax that was included in~~HTM securities during the ~~transfer is retained in other comprehensive income amortizing as an adjustment to interest income over the remaining life of the securities.~~three months ended March 31, 2017. During the ~~third quarter 2015,~~three months ended March 31, 2016, we transferred $1.1 billion of available-for-sale securities to held-to-maturity securities at a premium of $8 million, reflecting our intent and ability to hold those securities to maturity. The related $5purchased $15 million of unrealized holding gain, net of tax, that was included in the transfer is retained in other comprehensive income (loss) and is being amortized as an adjustment to interest income over the remaining life of theHTM securities. There were no ~~gains or losses recognized as a result~~sales of ~~this transfer.~~

~~We purchased zero and $15 million of held-to-maturity securities, which included U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed~~HTM securities during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2016, respectively. During both the three~~March 31, 2017 and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2015, we purchased $10 million of held-to-maturity securities.~~March 31, 2016.

~~Gains (losses) on sales of held-to-maturity~~Reverse repurchase agreements

For securities ~~are reported~~subject to reverse repurchase agreements, we record a receivable for the cash paid and any accrued interest, which is included in other ~~noninterest income in~~assets on the Consolidated Statements of ~~Operations. During both~~Financial Condition. Securities held by a custodian from counterparties under reverse repurchase agreements are not recognized on the ~~three~~Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition unless the counterparty defaults. The securities pledged as collateral under reverse repurchase transactions typically are U.S. Treasury securities or government sponsored agency MBS. In general, the securities transferred can be sold, re-pledged or otherwise used by the party in possession. The fair value of collateral under reverse repurchase agreements is monitored on an ongoing basis, and ~~nine months ended September 30,~~if necessary, additional collateral is obtained in accordance with the agreement. At March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had $50 million and ~~September 30, 2015, there were no sales~~zero, respectively, of ~~held-to-maturity securities. During both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, there were no maturities and $25 million of maturities in held-to-maturity~~ securities ~~respectively.~~subject to a reverse repurchase agreements.

The following table summarizes, by duration, the unrealized loss positions on investment securities:


	Unrealized Loss Position with Duration 12 Months and Over					Unrealized Loss Position with Duration Under 12 Months						Unrealized Loss Position with Duration 12 Months and Over					Unrealized Loss Position with Duration Under 12 Months
	Fair Value		Number of Securities	Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Number of Securities	Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Number of Securities	Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Number of Securities	Unrealized Loss
												(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2017
Type of Security	(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2016
Available-for-sale securities
Agency - Commercial	$	6	1	$	—	$	—	—	$	—		$	6	1	$	—	$	335	30	$	(5	)
Agency - Residential	—		—	—		75		6	—			—		—	—		873		56	(16		)
Municipal obligations	—		—	$	—	1		1	—			—		—	—		17		9	—
Held-to-maturity securities
Agency - Commercial	$	—	—	$	—	$	20	2	$	—		$	—	—	$	—	$	474	30	$	(6	)
Agency - Residential	—		—	—		19		2	—			—		—	—		380		47	(5		)
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2016
Available-for-sale securities
Agency - Commercial	$	—	—	$	—	$	482	27	$	(3	)	$	6	1	$	—	$	345	29	$	(5	)
Agency - Residential	8		2	—		224		15	(2		)	—		—	—		748		55	(16		)
Municipal obligations												—		—	—		17		8	—
Held-to-maturity securities
Agency - Commercial	$	—	—	$	—	$	471	27	$	(2	)	$	—	—	$	—	$	528	34	$	(6	)
Agency - Residential	—		—	—		547		50	(4		)	—		—	—		385		43	(4		)

The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities ~~at September 30, 2016,~~ are presented below by contractual maturity:


	Investment Securities Available-for-Sale						Investment Securities Held-to-maturity						March 31, 2017
	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield		Investment Securities Available-for-Sale						Investment Securities Held-to-maturity
September 30, 2016	(Dollars in millions)						(Dollars in millions)
													Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Weighted Average Yield
													(Dollars in millions)
Due after one year through five years	$	18	$	18	3.94	%	$	—	$	—	—	%	$	18	$	18	3.67	%	$	—	$	—	—	%
Due after five years through 10 years	7		7		2.64	%	61		63		2.50	%	18		18		4.40	%	61		61		2.50	%
Due after 10 years	1,070		1,090		2.45	%	1,095		1,114		2.40	%	1,631		1,614		2.31	%	987		977		2.42	%
Total	$	1,095	$	1,115			$	1,156	$	1,177			$	1,667	$	1,650			$	1,048	$	1,038

We pledge investment securities, primarily agency collateralized and municipal taxable ~~and agency collateralized~~ mortgage obligations, to collateralize lines of credit and/or borrowings. At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we had pledged investment securities of ~~$918~~$842 million compared to ~~$14~~$879 million at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

Note 3 –- Loans Held-for-Sale

The majority of our mortgage loans originated as ~~loans held-for-sale~~LHFS are sold into the secondary market by securitizing the loans into agency mortgage backed securities or on a whole loan ~~basis or by securitizing the loans and selling the securities.~~basis. At ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015, loans held-for-sale~~2016, LHFS totaled ~~$3.4~~$4.5 billion and ~~$2.6~~$3.2 billion, respectively. For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we had net gains on loan sales associated with ~~loans held-for-sale, excluding the gains from the sale~~LHFS of ~~mortgage loans transferred from loans held-for-investment, of $94~~$48 million ~~and $244 million, respectively,~~ as compared to ~~$68 million and $242~~$75 million during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2015, respectively.~~March 31, 2016.

At ~~September 30, 2016~~both March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015, $40~~2016, $32 million ~~and $35 million, respectively,~~ of ~~loans held-for-sale~~LHFS were recorded at lower of cost or fair value. The remainder of the loans in the portfolio are recorded at fair value as we have elected the fair value option for such loans.

Note 4 –- Loans Held-for-Investment

Loans held-for-investment are summarized as follows:


	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(Dollars in millions)				(Dollars in millions)
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	$	2,136	$	3,100	$	2,463	$	2,327
Second mortgage	127		135		86		126
HELOC	326		384		290		317
Other	30		31		27		28
Total consumer loans	2,619		3,650		2,866		2,798
Commercial loans
Commercial real estate (1)	1,168		814		1,399		1,261
Commercial and industrial	708		552		854		769
Warehouse lending	1,795		1,336		840		1,237
Total commercial loans	3,671		2,702		3,093		3,267
Total loans held-for-investment	$	6,290	$	6,352	$	5,959	$	6,065


(1)	Includes ~~$252~~$243 million and ~~$188~~$245 million of owner occupied commercial real estate loans at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2017, we transferred $2residential second mortgage loans with unpaid principal balances totaling $72 million ~~and $30 million, respectively, of loans~~to held-for-sale, ~~to loans held-for-investment, based~~ upon a change in our intent. We have entered into an agreement to sell these loans which are expected to settle in the second quarter 2017.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we sold nonperforming, TDR and non-agency loans with unpaid principal balances of ~~$110~~$10 million. Upon a change in our intent, the loans were transferred to ~~held-for-sale~~LHFS and subsequently sold resulting in a ~~loss on sale~~gain of $2less than $1 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, which is recorded in net ~~loss~~gain on ~~sale of assets~~loan sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. ~~The loans sold also resulted in a charge-off of $8 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~

Also, during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we sold performing residential first mortgage loans with unpaid principal balances of ~~$1.2 billion.~~$24 million. Upon a change in our intent, the loans were transferred to ~~held-for-sale~~LHFS and subsequently sold resulting in a gain of ~~$14~~less than $1 million, which is recorded in net gain on loan sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, we sold ~~or transferred interest-only residential first mortgage~~nonperforming, TDR and non-agency loans with unpaid principal balances totaling ~~$600 million, along with $420 million of nonperforming troubled debt restructuring ("TDR") and non-agency first mortgage loans.~~$96 million. Upon a change in our intent, the loans were transferred to ~~held-for-sale~~LHFS and subsequently sold resulting in a ~~net~~ loss on sale of ~~less than $1~~$2 million, which is recorded in net gain on loan sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. A portion of the general ALLL associated with these loans was reduced, resulting in a $6 million reduction in allowance.

Also during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015. The~~March 31, 2016, we sold performing residential first mortgage loans with UPB of $787 million. Upon a change in our intent, the loans were transferred to LHFS and subsequently sold ~~also resulted~~resulting in a ~~charge-off~~gain of ~~$67 million.~~$9 million, which was recorded in net gain on loan sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016, we purchased jumbo residential first mortgage loans with an unpaid principal balance of ~~$150 million and a premium of $1 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we purchased $197 million of home equity lines of credit ("HELOC") loans with a premium of $7~~$147 million.

We have pledged certain ~~loans held-for-investment, loans held-for-sale,~~LHFI, LHFS, and loans with government guarantees to collateralize lines of credit and/or borrowings with the ~~Federal Reserve Bank~~FHLB of ~~Chicago~~Indianapolis and the ~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~FRB of ~~Indianapolis.~~Chicago. At ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, we had pledged loans of ~~$5.6~~$6.8 billion and ~~$5.8~~$5.3 billion, respectively.

Allowance for Loan Losses

We determine the ~~appropriate~~ estimate of the ~~allowance for loan losses~~ALLL on at least a quarterly basis. Refer to Note 1 ~~"Description~~- Description of Business, Basis of Presentation, and Summary of Significant Accounting ~~Policies"~~Policies to the consolidated financial statements in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, for a description of the methodology. The ~~all~~

~~owance for loan losses,~~ALLL, other than for loans that have

been identified for individual evaluation for impairment, is determined on a loan pool basis by grouping loan types with common risk characteristics to determine our best estimate of incurred losses.

The ~~allowance for loan losses~~changes in ALLL, by class of loan, are summarized in the following table:

Residential
First
Mortgage (1)

Second
Mortgage
HELOC
Other
Consumer

Commercial
Real Estate

Commercial
and Industrial

Warehouse
Lending
Total
(Dollars in millions)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Beginning balance allowance for loan losses $ 81
$ 10
$ 20
$ 1
$ 19
$ 11
$ 8
$ 150
Charge-offs (2) (7 ) —
(1 ) (1 ) —
—
—
(9 )
Recoveries —
—
1
1
—
—
—
2
Provision (benefit) (3) (4 ) (1 ) (4 ) —
6
3
—
—
Ending balance allowance for loan losses $ 70
$ 9
$ 16
$ 1
$ 25
$ 14
$ 8
$ 143
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Beginning balance allowance for loan losses $ 151
$ 14
$ 25
$ 1
$ 15
$ 12
$ 4
$ 222
Charge-offs (2) (21 ) (1 ) (1 ) (1 ) —
(3 ) —
(27 )
Recoveries 1
1
—
1
—
—
—
3
Provision (benefit) (2 ) (1 ) (1 ) —
(2 ) 5
—
(1 )
Ending balance allowance for loan losses $ 129
$ 13

$ 23

$ 1

$ 13

$ 14

$ 4

$ 197

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Beginning balance allowance for loan losses $ 116
$ 11
$ 21
$ 2
$ 18
$ 13
$ 6
$ 187
Charge-offs (2) (26 ) (2 ) (2 ) (3 ) —
—
—
(33 )
Recoveries 1
1
1
2
—
—
—
5
Provision (benefit) (3) (21 ) (1 ) (4 ) —
7
1
2
(16 )
Ending balance allowance for loan losses $ 70
$ 9
$ 16
$ 1
$ 25
$ 14
$ 8
$ 143
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Beginning balance allowance for loan losses $ 234
$ 12
$ 19
$ 1
$ 17
$ 11
$ 3
$ 297
Charge-offs (2) (80 ) (2 ) (2 ) (3 ) —
(3 ) —
(90 )
Recoveries 3
1
—
2
2
—
—
8
Provision (benefit) (28 ) 2
6
1
(6 ) 6
1
(18 )
Ending balance allowance for loan losses $ 129
$ 13
$ 23
$ 1
$ 13
$ 14
$ 4
$ 197



	Residential First Mortgage (1)			Second Mortgage			HELOC			Other Consumer			Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial			Warehouse Lending			Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Beginning balance ALLL	$	65		$	8		$	16		$	1		$	28	$	17		$	7		$	142
Charge-offs (2)	(4		)	—			—			(1		)	—		—			—			(5		)
Recoveries	—			—			—			1			—		—			—			1
Provision (benefit)	—			(1		)	(2		)	—			4		3			(1		)	3
Ending balance ALLL	$	61		$	7		$	14		$	1		$	32	$	20		$	6		$	141
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Beginning balance ALLL	$	116		$	11		$	21		$	2		$	18	$	13		$	6		$	187
Charge-offs (2)	(11		)	(1		)	(1		)	(1		)	—		—			—			(14		)
Recoveries	—			—			1			1			—		—			—			2
Provision (benefit)	(10		)	—			(1		)	—			1		(3		)	—			(13		)
Ending balance ALLL	$	95		$	10		$	20		$	2		$	19	$	10		$	6		$	162


(1)	Includes allowance and charge-offs related to loans with government guarantees.

(2)

Includes charge-offs of ~~zero~~$1 million and ~~$16~~$6 million related to the transfer and subsequent sale of loans during the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, ~~and September 30, 2015, respectively, and $8 million and $67 million related to the sale of loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015,~~ respectively. Also includes charge-offs related to loans with government guarantees of $6$2 million and ~~$13~~$3 million during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, respectively.


~~(3)~~	Does not include $7 million provision for loan losses recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations to reserve for repossessed loans with government guarantees during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The ~~loans held-for-investment and allowance for loan losses~~method of evaluation, by class of loan, is summarized in the following table:

Residential
First
Mortgage (1)

Second
Mortgage
HELOC
Other
Consumer

Commercial
Real Estate

Commercial
and Industrial

Warehouse
Lending
Total
(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2016
Loans held-for-investment
Individually evaluated $ 42
$ 26
$ 4
$ —
$ —
$ 1
$ —
$ 73
Collectively evaluated (2) 2,087
60
291
30
1,168
707
1,795
6,138
Total loans $ 2,129
$ 86

$ 295

$ 30

$ 1,168

$ 708

$ 1,795

$ 6,211
Allowance for loan losses
Individually evaluated $ 7
$ 6
$ 1
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ 14
Collectively evaluated (2) 63
3
15
1
25
14
8
129
Total allowance for loan losses $ 70
$ 9

$ 16

$ 1

$ 25

$ 14

$ 8

$ 143

December 31, 2015
Loans held-for-investment
Individually evaluated $ 87
$ 28
$ 3
$ —
$ —
$ 2
$ —
$ 120
Collectively evaluated (2) 3,007
65
318
31
814
550
1,336
6,121
Total loans $ 3,094
$ 93
$ 321
$ 31
$ 814
$ 552
$ 1,336
$ 6,241
Allowance for loan losses
Individually evaluated $ 12
$ 6
$ 1
$ 1
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ 20
Collectively evaluated (2) 104
5
20
1
18
13
6
167
Total allowance for loan losses $ 116
$ 11
$ 21
$ 2
$ 18
$ 13
$ 6
$ 187



	Residential First Mortgage (1)		Second Mortgage		HELOC		Other Consumer		Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Warehouse Lending		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2017
Loans held-for-investment (2)
Individually evaluated	$	36	$	24	$	3	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	63
Collectively evaluated	2,420		58		286		26		1,399		854		840		5,883
Total loans	$	2,456	$	82	$	289	$	26	$	1,399	$	854	$	840	$	5,946
Allowance for loan losses (2)
Individually evaluated	$	4	$	5	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	11
Collectively evaluated	57		2		12		1		32		20		6		130
Total allowance for loan losses	$	61	$	7	$	14	$	1	$	32	$	20	$	6	$	141

December 31, 2016
Loans held-for-investment (2)
Individually evaluated	$	46	$	26	$	3	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	75
Collectively evaluated	2,274		59		290		28		1,261		769		1,237		5,918
Total loans	$	2,320	$	85	$	293	$	28	$	1,261	$	769	$	1,237	$	5,993
Allowance for loan losses (2)
Individually evaluated	$	5	$	6	$	2	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	13
Collectively evaluated	60		2		14		1		28		17		7		129
Total allowance for loan losses	$	65	$	8	$	16	$	1	$	28	$	17	$	7	$	142


(1)	Includes allowance related to loans with government guarantees.


(2)	Excludes loans carried under the fair value option.

The following table sets forth the ~~loans held-for-investment~~LHFI aging analysis ~~as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015,~~ of past due and current loans:


	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater Past Due (1)		Total Past Due		Current		Total Investment Loans		30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater Past Due (1)		Total Past Due		Current		Total Investment Loans
	(Dollars in millions)												(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2016
March 31, 2017
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	$	4	$	1	$	29	$	34	$	2,102	$	2,136	$	3	$	1	$	26	$	30	$	2,433	$	2,463
Second mortgage	—		—		4		4		123		127		—		—		1		1		85		86
HELOC	1		—		7		8		318		326		1		—		1		2		288		290
Other	1		1		—		2		28		30		—		—		—		—		27		27
Total consumer loans	6		2		40		48		2,571		2,619		4		1		28		33		2,833		2,866
Commercial loans
Commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		1,168		1,168		—		—		—		—		1,399		1,399
Commercial and industrial	—		—		—		—		708		708		—		—		—		—		854		854
Warehouse lending	—		—		—		—		1,795		1,795		—		—		—		—		840		840
Total commercial loans	—		—		—		—		3,671		3,671		—		—		—		—		3,093		3,093
Total loans (2)	$	6	$	2	$	40	$	48	$	6,242	$	6,290	$	4	$	1	$	28	$	33	$	5,926	$	5,959
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2016
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	$	7	$	3	$	53	$	63	$	3,037	$	3,100	$	6	$	—	$	29	$	35	$	2,292	$	2,327
Second mortgage	—		—		2		2		133		135		—		1		4		5		121		126
HELOC	2		1		9		12		372		384		1		1		7		9		308		317
Other	1		—		—		1		30		31		1		—		—		1		27		28
Total consumer loans	10		4		64		78		3,572		3,650		8		2		40		50		2,748		2,798
Commercial loans
Commercial real estate	—		—		—		—		814		814		—		—		—		—		1,261		1,261
Commercial and industrial	—		—		2		2		550		552		—		—		—		—		769		769
Warehouse lending	—		—		—		—		1,336		1,336		—		—		—		—		1,237		1,237
Total commercial loans	—		—		2		2		2,700		2,702		—		—		—		—		3,267		3,267
Total loans (2)	$	10	$	4	$	66	$	80	$	6,272	$	6,352	$	8	$	2	$	40	$	50	$	6,015	$	6,065


(1)	Includes loans 90 days or greater past due and performing nonaccrual loans that are less than 90 days past ~~due, which have been placed on nonaccrual.~~due.


(2)	Includes ~~$12~~$3 million and ~~$10~~$13 million of loans 90 days or greater past due, accounted for under the fair value option at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

~~For all classes within the consumer and commercial loan portfolio, loans~~Loans are ~~placed on nonaccrual status~~considered to be past due when any ~~portion~~payment of principal or interest is 30 days past the scheduled payment date. While it is the goal of management to collect on loans, we attempt to work out a satisfactory repayment schedule or modification with past due borrowers and will undertake foreclosure proceedings if the delinquency is not satisfactorily resolved. Our practices regarding past due loans are designed to both assist borrowers in meeting their contractual obligations and minimize losses incurred by the bank.

We cease the accrual of interest on all classes of consumer and commercial loans once they become 90 days past due, ~~(or are determined~~or when doubt exists as to ~~be impaired), or earlier when we become aware of information indicating that~~the ultimate collection of principal ~~and~~or interest ~~is in doubt.~~(classified as nonaccrual or nonperforming loans). When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, the accrued interest income is ~~reversed. Loans~~reversed and may only return to accrual status when principal and interest become current and are anticipated to be fully collectible.

Interest income is recognized on nonaccrual loans using a cash basis method. Interest that would have been accrued on impaired loans totaled $1 million ~~and $2 million~~ during both the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2016, respectively,~~March 31, 2017 and ~~$1 million and $4 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.~~March 31, 2016. At ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, we had no loans 90 days past due and still ~~accruing.~~accruing interest.

Troubled Debt Restructuring

We may modify certain loans in both our consumer and commercial loan portfolios to retain customers or to maximize collection of the outstanding loan balance. We have programs designed to assist borrowers by extending payment dates or reducing the borrower's contractual payments. All loan modifications are made on a case-by-case basis. Our standards relating to loan modifications consider, among other factors, minimum verified income requirements, cash flow analysis, and collateral valuations. TDRs result in those instances in which a borrower demonstrates financial difficulty and for which a concession has been granted, which includes reductions of interest rate, extensions of amortization period, principal and/or interest forgiveness and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral. These loans are classified as nonperforming TDRs if the loan was nonperforming prior to the restructuring, or based upon the results of a contemporaneous credit evaluation. Such loans will continue on nonaccrual status until the borrower has established a willingness and ability to make the restructured payments for at least six months, after which they will be classified as performing TDRs and begin to accrue interest. Performing and nonperforming TDRs remain impaired as interest and principal will not be received in accordance with the original contractual terms of the loan agreement.

Some loan modifications classified as TDRs may not ultimately result in the full collection of principal and interest, as modified, but may give rise to potential incremental losses. We measure impairments using a discounted cash flow method for performing TDRs and measure impairment based on collateral values for ~~re-defaulted~~nonperforming TDRs.

The following table provides a summary of TDRs ~~outstanding~~ by type and performing status:

TDRs
Performing Nonperforming Total
September 30, 2016 (Dollars in millions)
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage $ 23
$ 10
$ 33
Second mortgage 33
3
36
HELOC 14
4
18
Total consumer loans 70
17
87
Commercial loans
Commercial and industrial 1
—
1
Total commercial loans 1
—
1
Total TDRs (1)(2)
$ 71
$ 17
$ 88

December 31, 2015
Consumer loans

Residential first mortgage $ 49
$ 27
$ 76
Second mortgage 32
1
33
HELOC 20
7
27
Total TDRs (1)(2)
$ 101
$ 35
$ 136



	TDRs
	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2017
Consumer loans (1)
Residential first mortgage	$	20	$	10	$	30
Second mortgage	26		1		27
HELOC	2		—		2
Total TDRs (2)	$	48	$	11	$	59
December 31, 2016
Consumer loans (1)
Residential first mortgage	$	22	$	11	$	33
Second mortgage	35		4		39
HELOC	10		3		13
Total TDRs (2)	$	67	$	18	$	85


(1)	The ~~allowance for loan losses~~ALLL on consumer TDR loans totaled ~~$11~~$8 million and ~~$15~~$9 million at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.


(2)	Includes ~~$26~~$1 million and ~~$32~~$25 million of TDR loans accounted for under the fair value option at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

The following table provides a summary of newly modified ~~TDRs during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015.~~TDRs:


	New TDRs								New TDRs
	Number of Accounts	Pre-Modification Unpaid Principal Balance		Post-Modification Unpaid Principal Balance (1)		Increase in Allowance at Modification			Number of Accounts	Pre-Modification Unpaid Principal Balance		Post-Modification Unpaid Principal Balance (1)		Increase in Allowance at Modification
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016		(Dollars in millions)
Residential first mortgages	1	$	—	$	—	$	—
Second mortgages	16	1		1		—
HELOC (2)(3)	1	—		—		—
Total TDR loans	18	$	1	$	1	$	—
										(Dollars in millions)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Residential first mortgages	48	$	13	$	14	$	—		2	$	—	$	—	$	—
Second mortgages	15	1		1		—			9	1		1		—
HELOC (2)	46	4		4		—			5	—		—		—
Total TDR loans	109	$	18	$	19	$	—		16	$	1	$	1	$	—

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Residential first mortgages	17	$	3	$	4	$	—		13	$	2	$	3	$	—
Second mortgages	42	2		2		—			21	1		1		—
HELOC (2)(3)	86	6		5		—
Commercial and industrial	1	2		1		—
HELOC (2)									65	4		3		—
Commercial and Industrial									1	2		1		—
Total TDR loans	146	$	13	$	12	$	—		100	$	9	$	8	$	—

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Residential first mortgages	239	$	66	$	65	$	(1	)
Second mortgages	83	4		3		—
HELOC (2)(3)	204	12		11		—
Other consumer	3	—		—		—
Total TDR loans	529	$	82	$	79	$	(1	)


(1)	Post-modification balances include past due amounts that are capitalized at modification date.


(2)	HELOC post-modification unpaid principal balance reflects write downs.


~~(3)~~	~~Includes loans carried at the fair value option.~~

~~The following table provides a summary of TDR loans~~There were no TDRs that were modified ~~within~~in the previous 12 months, which have subsequently defaulted during the three months ended March 31, 2017, as compared to one residential first mortgage loan and four HELOC loans which subsequently defaulted during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016, ~~and 2015.~~with a UPB of less than $1 million. All TDR classes within the consumer and commercial ~~loan~~ portfolios are considered subsequently defaulted when ~~they are~~ greater than 90 days past due. There was no increase or decrease in the allowance associated with these TDRs at subsequent default. Subsequent default is defined as a payment re-defaulted within 12 months of the restructuring date.



	~~TDRs that were modified in the previous 12 months,~~ ~~which have subsequently defaulted~~
	~~Number of~~ ~~Accounts~~	~~Unpaid Principal Balance~~		~~Increase in Allowance at Subsequent Default~~
~~Three Months Ended September 30, 2016~~	~~(Dollars in millions)~~
~~HELOC~~ ~~(1)~~	3	$	—	$	—
~~Total TDR loans~~	3	$	—	$	—
~~Three Months Ended September 30, 2015~~
~~Residential first mortgages~~	1	$	—	$	—
~~Total TDR loans~~	1	$	—	$	—
~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016~~
~~Residential first mortgages~~	1	$	—	$	—
~~HELOC~~ ~~(1)~~	7	—		—
~~Total TDR loans~~	8	$	—	$	—
~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015~~
~~Residential first mortgages~~	1	$	—	$	—
~~Second mortgages~~	1	—		—
~~Total TDR loans~~	2	$	—	$	—


~~(1)~~	~~HELOC post-modification unpaid principal balance reflects write downs.~~

Impaired Loans

Loans are considered impaired if it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement or when any portion of principal or interest is 90 days past due. The following table presents individually evaluated impaired loans and the associated allowance:


	September 30, 2016						December 31, 2015						March 31, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Net Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
	(Dollars in millions)												(Dollars in millions)
With no related allowance recorded
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	$	2	$	1	$	—	$	20	$	20	$	—	$	11	$	12	$	—	$	6	$	6	$	—
Commercial loans
Commercial and industrial	1		1		—		5		2		—
	$	3	$	2	$	—	$	25	$	22	$	—
Total consumer loans with no related allowance recorded													$	11	$	12	$	—	$	6	$	6	$	—
With an allowance recorded
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	$	40	$	41	$	7	$	65	$	67	$	12	$	24	$	24	$	4	$	40	$	40	$	5
Second mortgage	26		26		6		28		28		6		24		24		5		26		26		6
HELOC	4		4		2		3		3		1		3		3		2		3		3		2
Other consumer	—		—		—		—		—		1
Total consumer loans with an allowance recorded													$	51	$	51	$	11	$	69	$	69	$	13
	$	70	$	71	$	15	$	96	$	98	$	20
Total
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	$	42	$	42	$	7	$	85	$	87	$	12	$	35	$	36	$	4	$	46	$	46	$	5
Second mortgage	26		26		6		28		28		6		24		24		5		26		26		6
HELOC	4		4		2		3		3		1		3		3		2		3		3		2
Other consumer	—		—		—		—		—		1
Commercial loans
Commercial and industrial	1		1		—		5		2		—
Total impaired loans	$	73	$	73	$	15	$	121	$	120	$	20	$	62	$	63	$	11	$	75	$	75	$	13

The following table presents average impaired loans and the interest income recognized:


	Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,								Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016				2015				2016				2015				2017				2016
	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
	(Dollars in millions)																(Dollars in millions)
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	$	43	$	—	$	96	$	1	$	55	$	1	$	172	$	4	$	42	$	—	$	74	$	1
Second mortgage	25		—		29		—		26		1		30		—		25		1		27		—
HELOC	5		—		15		—		5		—		6		—		3		—		4		—
Commercial loans
Commercial and industrial	1		—		2		—		2		—		1		—		—		—		5		—
Total impaired loans	$	74	$	—	$	142	$	1	$	88	$	2	$	209	$	4	$	70	$	1	$	110	$	1

Credit Quality

We utilize an internal risk rating system in accordance with the Rating Credit Risk booklet of the Comptroller's Handbook, April 2011 and the Uniform Retail Credit classification and Account Management Policy issued June 20, 2000 by the Federal Financial Institution Examination Council ("FFIEC") which is applied to all consumer and commercial loans. Descriptions of our internal risk ratings as they relate to credit quality follow the ratings used by the U.S. bank regulatory agencies as listed below.

Pass. Pass assets are not impaired nor do they have any known deficiencies that could impact the quality of the asset.

Watch. Watch assets are defined as pass rated assets that exhibit elevated risk characteristics or other factors that deserve management’s close attention and increased monitoring. However, the asset does not exhibit a potential or well-defined weakness that would warrant a downgrade to criticized or adverse classification.

Special mention. Assets identified as special mention possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving management's close attention. Special mention assets have a potential weakness or pose an unwarranted financial risk that, if not corrected, could weaken the assets and increase risk in the future. Special mention assets are criticized, but do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

Substandard. Assets identified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. For HELOC loans and other consumer loans, we evaluate credit quality based on the aging and status of payment activity and any other known credit characteristics that call into question full repayment of the asset. Nonperforming loans are classified as either substandard, doubtful or loss.

Doubtful. An asset classified as doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in one classified substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable. A doubtful asset has a high probability of total or substantial loss, but because of specific pending events that may strengthen the asset, its classification as loss is deferred. Doubtful borrowers are usually in default, lack adequate liquidity or capital, and lack the resources necessary to remain an operating entity. Pending events can include mergers, acquisitions, liquidations, capital injections, the perfection of liens on additional collateral, the valuation of collateral, and refinancing. Generally, pending events should be resolved within a relatively short period and the ratings will be adjusted based on the new information. Because of high probability of loss, non-accrual accounting treatment is required for doubtful assets.

Loss. An asset classified as loss is considered uncollectible and of such little value that the continuance as a bankable asset is not warranted. This classification does not mean that an asset has absolutely no recovery or salvage value, but, rather that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this basically worthless asset even though partial recovery may be affected in the future.

Commercial Loans

Management conducts periodic examinations which serve as an independent verification of the accuracy of the ratings assigned. Loan grades are based on different factors within the borrowing relationship: entity sales, debt service coverage, debt/total net worth, liquidity, balance sheet and income statement trends, management experience, business stability, financing structure, ~~of the deal,~~ and financial reporting requirements. The underlying collateral is also rated based on the specific type of collateral and corresponding ~~loan-to-value ("LTV").~~LTV. The combination of the borrower and collateral risk ratings result in the final rating for the borrowing relationship.

Consumer Loans

The same rating principles are used for consumer and commercial loans, but the principles are applied differently for consumer loans. Consumer loans consist of open and closed end loans extended to individuals for household, family, and other personal expenditures, and includes consumer loans, and loans to individuals secured by their personal residence, including first mortgage, home equity, and home improvement loans. Because consumer loans are usually relatively small-balance, homogeneous exposures, consumer loans are rated primarily on payment performance. Payment performance is a proxy for the strength of repayment capacity and loans are generally classified based on their payment status rather than by an individual review of each loan.

In accordance with regulatory guidance, we assign risk ratings to consumer loans in the following manner:

•Consumer loans are classified as Watch once the loan becomes 60 days past due.

•Open and closed-end consumer loans 90 days or more past due are classified Substandard.



	March 31, 2017
	Pass		Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Total Loans
	(Dollars in millions)
Consumer Loans
Residential First Mortgage	$	2,414	$	21	$	—	$	28	$	2,463
Second Mortgage	60		25		—		1		86
HELOC	286		3		—		1		290
Other Consumer	27		—		—		—		27
Total Consumer Loans	$	2,787	$	49	$	—	$	30	$	2,866

Commercial Loans
Commercial Real Estate	$	1,357	$	34	$	—	$	8	$	1,399
Commercial and Industrial	769		58		9		18		854
Warehouse	813		27		—		—		840
Total Commercial Loans	$	2,939	$	119	$	9	$	26	$	3,093

Commercial Credit Loans
Commercial Real
Estate

Commercial and
Industrial
Warehouse
Total
Commercial
September 30, 2016 (Dollars in millions)
Grade
Pass $ 1,122
$ 654
$ 1,659
$ 3,435
Watch 37
20
86
143
Special mention 3
33
50
86
Substandard 6
1
—
7
Total loans $ 1,168
$ 708
$ 1,795
$ 3,671

December 31, 2015
Grade
Pass $ 766
$ 492
$ 1,181
$ 2,439
Watch 42
30
155
227
Special mention 2
21
—
23
Substandard 4
9
—
13
Total loans $ 814
$ 552
$ 1,336
$ 2,702

Consumer Credit Loans
Residential First
Mortgage

Second
Mortgage
HELOC Other Consumer Total
September 30, 2016 (Dollars in millions)
Grade
Pass $ 2,081
$ 90
$ 305
$ 29
$ 2,505
Watch 24
33
14
1
72
Substandard 31
4
7
—
42
Total loans $ 2,136
$ 127
$ 326
$ 30
$ 2,619

December 31, 2015
Grade
Pass $ 2,993
$ 101
$ 353
$ 31
$ 3,478
Watch 49
32
22
—
103
Substandard 58
2
9
—
69
Total loans $ 3,100
$ 135
$ 384
$ 31
$ 3,650



	December 31, 2016
	Pass		Watch		Special Mention		Substandard		Total Loans
	(Dollars in millions)
Consumer Loans
Residential First Mortgage	$	2,273	$	23	$	—	$	31	$	2,327
Second Mortgage	87		35		—		4		126
HELOC	299		11		—		7		317
Other Consumer	28		—		—		—		28
Total Consumer Loans	$	2,687	$	69	$	—	$	42	$	2,798

Commercial Loans
Commercial Real Estate	$	1,225	$	27	$	3	$	6	$	1,261
Commercial and Industrial	678		59		21		11		769
Warehouse	1,168		16		53		—		1,237
Total Commercial Loans	$	3,071	$	102	$	77	$	17	$	3,267

Note 5 –- Loans with Government Guarantees

Substantially all loans with government guarantees are insured or guaranteed by the ~~Federal Housing Administration ("FHA")~~FHA and U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. FHA loans earn interest at a rate based upon the 10-year U.S. Treasury note rate at the time the underlying loan becomes delinquent, which is not paid by the FHA until claimed. Certain loans within our portfolio may be subject to indemnifications and insurance limits which exposes us to limited credit risk. We have reserved for these risks within other assets and as a component of our ~~allowance for loan losses~~ALLL on residential first mortgages.

At ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, loans with government guarantees totaled ~~$404~~$322 million and ~~$485 million, respectively.~~ $365 million.

At ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively, repossessed assets and the associated claims recorded in other assets totaled ~~$152~~$119 million and ~~$210 million, respectively.~~$135 million.

Note 6 –- Variable Interest Entities ("VIEs")

In 2015, we executed clean-up calls of the FSTAR 2005-1 and FSTAR 2006-2 long-term debt associated with the HELOC securitization trusts. As a result, the FSTAR 2005-1 and FSTAR 2006-2 HELOC securitization trusts were dissolved and weWe have no consolidated VIEs as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015.~~2016.

We have a continuing involvement, but are not the primary beneficiary for one unconsolidated VIE related to the FSTAR 2007-1 mortgage securitization trust. In accordance with the settlement agreement with MBIA, ~~Insurance Corporation ("MBIA"),~~ there is no further recourse to us related to FSTAR 2007-1, unless MBIA fails to meet their obligations. At ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, the FSTAR 2007-1 mortgage securitization trust included ~~2,608~~2,320 loans and ~~3,061~~2,453 loans, respectively, with an aggregate principal balance of ~~$96~~$82 million and ~~$117~~$89 million, respectively.

Note 7 –- Mortgage Servicing Rights

We have investments in ~~mortgage servicing rights ("MSRs")~~MSRs that result from the sale of loans to the secondary market for which we retain the servicing. The primary risk associated with MSRs is the potential reduction in fair value as a result of higher than anticipated prepayments due to loan refinancing prompted, in part, by declining interest rates or government intervention. Conversely, these assets generally increase in value in a rising interest rate environment to the extent that prepayments are slower than anticipated. We utilize derivatives as economic hedges to offset changes in the fair value of the MSRs resulting from the actual or anticipated changes in prepayments stemming from changing interest rate environments. There is also a risk of valuation decline due to higher than expected increases in default rates, which we do not believe can be effectively managed using derivatives. For further information, See Note 8 ~~of the Notes to the Consolidated~~- Derivative Financial ~~Statements, herein, for further information~~Instruments, regarding the derivative instruments utilized to manage our MSR risks.

Changes in the carrying value of residential first mortgage MSRs, accounted for at fair value, were as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)												(Dollars in millions)
Balance at beginning of period	$	301		$	317		$	296		$	258		$	335		$	296
Additions from loans sold with servicing retained	51			74			173			220			21			57
Reductions from sales	(17		)	(73		)	(41		)	(144		)	(65		)	(24		)
Changes in fair value due to (1)
Decrease in MSR due to pay-offs, pay-downs and run-off	(19		)	(9		)	(45		)	(34		)	(6		)	(11		)
Changes in estimates of fair value (2)	(14		)	(15		)	(81		)	(6		)	10			(37		)
Fair value of MSRs at end of period	$	302		$	294		$	302		$	294
Balance at end of period													$	295		$	281


(1)	Changes in fair value are included within net return (loss) ~~return~~ on ~~mortgage servicing rights~~MSRs on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.


(2)	Represents estimated MSR value change resulting primarily from market-driven changes.

The following table summarizes the hypothetical effect on the fair value of servicing rights ~~carried at fair value~~ using adverse changes of 10 percent and 20 percent to the weighted average of certain significant assumptions used in valuing these ~~assets:~~assets. The significant assumptions used in the fair value measurement of the MSRs are option adjusted spread and prepayment rate. Significant increases (decreases) in both of these assumptions in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.


	September 30, 2016							December 31, 2015							March 31, 2017							December 31, 2016
				Fair value impact due to							Fair value impact due to							Fair value after							Fair value after
	Actual			10% adverse change		20% adverse change		Actual			10% adverse change		20% adverse change		Actual			10% adverse change		20% adverse change		Actual			10% adverse change		20% adverse change
				(Dollars in millions)											(Dollars in millions)
Option adjusted spread	9.20		%	$	295	$	288	8.24		%	$	287	$	279	6.56		%	$	289	$	284	7.78		%	$	326	$	318
Constant prepayment rate	15.68		%	290		280		12.63		%	285		275		9.00		%	285		277		16.68		%	322		311
Weighted average cost to service per loan	$	70.75		299		295		$	71.86		292		288		$	68.04		292		288		$	68.18		330		326

The sensitivity calculations above are hypothetical and should not be considered to be predictive of future performance. Changes in fair value based on adverse changes in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated because the relationship of the change in assumption to the change in fair value may not be linear. To isolate the effect of the specified

change, the fair value shock analysis is consistent with the identified adverse change, while holding all other assumptions constant. In practice, a change in one assumption generally impacts other assumptions, which may either magnify or counteract the effect of the change.

~~See Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, herein, for~~ For further fair value disclosures relating to ~~mortgage servicing rights.~~MSRs, see Note 17 - Fair Value Measurements.

Contractual servicing and subservicing fees. Contractual servicing and subservicing fees, including late fees and other ancillary income are presented below. Contractual servicing fees are included within net (loss) return on ~~mortgage servicing rights~~MSRs on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Contractual subservicing fees including late fees and other ancillary income are included within loan administration income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Subservicing fee income is recorded for fees earned, net of third party subservicing costs, for loans subserviced.

The following table summarizes income and fees associated with contractual servicing rights:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)												(Dollars in millions)
Income on mortgage servicing rights
Servicing fees, ancillary income and late fees (1)	$	22		$	18		$	60		$	52		$	20		$	17
Changes in fair value ~~(2)~~	(33		)	(24		)	(126		)	(38		)	4			(48		)
Gain on MSR derivatives (3)	(1		)	15			44			10
(Loss) gain on MSR derivatives (2)													(8		)	26
Net transaction costs	1			3			1			(5		)	(2		)	(1		)
Total (loss) return, included in net return on mortgage servicing rights	$	(11	)	$	12		$	(21	)	$	19
Total net return (loss) on mortgage servicing rights													$	14		$	(6	)


(1)	Servicing fees are recorded on the accrual basis. Ancillary income and late fees are recorded on a cash basis.


(2)	~~Includes a $2 million gain related to the sale of MSRs during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.~~


~~(3)~~	Changes in the derivatives utilized as economic hedges to offset changes in fair value of the MSRs.

The following table summarizes income and fees associated with our mortgage loans subserviced:

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Income on mortgage loans subserviced
Subservicing fees, ancillary income and late fees (1)
$ 7
$ 8
$ 21
$ 24
Other servicing charges (3 ) —
(7 ) (5 )
Total income, included in loan administration $ 4
$ 8
$ 14
$ 19



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Income (expenses) on mortgage loans subserviced
Servicing fees, ancillary income and late fees (1)	$	8		$	8
Other servicing charges	(2		)	(2		)
Total income on mortgage loans subserviced, included in loan administration	$	6		$	6


(1)	Servicing fees are recorded on the accrual basis. Ancillary income and late fees are recorded on cash basis.

Note 8 –- Derivative Financial Instruments

Derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair value in other assets and other liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition after taking into account the effects of legally enforceable bilateral collateral and master netting agreements. We are exposed to non-performance risk by the counterparties to our various derivative financial instruments. ~~We believe that the non-performance risk inherent in all our derivative contracts is minimal based on credit standards and the collateral provisions of the derivative agreements.~~ A majority of our derivatives are centrally cleared through a Central Counterparty Clearing House or consist of residential mortgage interest rate lock commitments further limiting our exposure to non-performance risk. We believe that the non-performance risk inherent in our remaining derivative contracts is minimal based on credit standards and the collateral provisions of the derivative agreements.

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: We maintain a derivative portfolio of interest rate swaps, futures and forward commitments used to manage exposure to changes in interest rates, MSR asset values and to meet the needs of customers. We also enter into interest rate lock commitments, which are commitments to originate mortgage loans whereby the interest rate on the loan is determined prior to funding and the customers have locked into that interest rate. Market risk on interest rate lock commitments and mortgage ~~loans held-for-sale~~LHFS is managed using corresponding forward sale commitments.

Changes in fair value of derivatives not designated as hedging instruments are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Income.

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: We have designated certain interest rate swaps as cash flow hedges of certain interest rate payments of our variable-rate ~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~FHLB advances.

Changes in the fair value of derivatives designated as cash flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition and reclassified into interest expense in the same period in which the hedge transaction is recognized in earnings. At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we had ~~$37~~$2 million (net-of-tax) ~~recorded~~ of unrealized ~~losses~~gains on derivatives classified as cash flow hedges recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), compared to $3$1 million at December 31, ~~2015.~~2016. The estimated amount to be reclassified from other comprehensive income into earnings during the next 12 months represents $7$4 million of losses (net-of-tax).

Derivatives that are designated in hedging relationships are assessed for effectiveness using regression analysis at inception and throughout the hedge period. All hedge relationships were and are expected to be highly effective as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017. Cash flows and the profit impact associated with designated hedges are reported in the same category as the underlying hedged item.

The notional amount, estimated fair value and maturity of our derivative financial instruments were as follows:



	March 31, 2017 (1)
	Notional Amount		Fair Value (2)		Expiration Dates
	(Dollars in millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Assets
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances	$	200	$	—	2024
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances	$	630	$	1	2023-2026
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Assets
Futures	$	2,190	$	1	2017-2019
Mortgage backed securities forwards	699		3		2017
Rate lock commitments	4,627		41		2017
Interest rate swaps and swaptions	2,629		32		2017-2047
Total derivative assets	$	10,145	$	77
Liabilities
Futures	$	198	$	—	2018-2021
Mortgage backed securities forwards	6,269		38		2017
Rate lock commitments	77		—		2017
Interest rate swaps	602		3		2017-2027
Total derivative liabilities	$	7,146	$	41
	December 31, 2016
	Notional Amount		Fair Value (2)		Expiration Dates
	(Dollars in millions)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Assets
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances	$	600	$	20	2023-2026
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances	$	230	$	1	2025-2026
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Assets
Futures	$	4,621	$	2	2017-2020
Mortgage backed securities forwards	3,776		43		2017
Rate lock commitments	3,517		24		2017
Interest rate swaps and swaptions	2,231		35		2017-2033
Total derivative assets	$	14,145	$	104
Liabilities
Futures	$	134	$	—	2017
Mortgage backed securities forwards	1,893		11		2017
Rate lock commitments	598		6		2017
Interest rate swaps	1,129		37		2017-2047
Total derivative liabilities	$	3,754	$	54


(1)	At March 31, 2017, variation margin pledged to or received from a Central Counterparty Clearing House to cover the prior day’s fair value of open positions is considered settlement of the derivative position for accounting purposes. At December 31, 2016, variation margin was not recognized as settlement.


(2)	Derivative assets and liabilities are included in other assets and other liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, respectively.

The following tables present the derivatives subject to a master netting arrangement, including the cash pledged as collateral:



			Gross Amounts Netted in the Statement of Financial Position		Net Amount Presented in the Statement of Financial Position		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position
	Gross Amount		Gross Amounts Netted in the Statement of Financial Position		Net Amount Presented in the Statement of Financial Position		Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral
	(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2017
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances (1)	$	1	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	28

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Assets
Futures	$	1	$	—	$	1	$	—	$	—
Mortgage backed securities forwards	3		—		3		—		—
Interest rate swaps and swaptions (1)	32		—		32		—		37
Total derivative assets	$	36	$	—	$	36	$	—	$	37

Liabilities
Mortgage backed securities forwards	38		—		38		—		36
Interest rate swaps and swaptions (1)	3		—		3		—		14
Total derivative liabilities	$	41	$	—	$	41	$	—	$	50

December 31, 2016
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Assets
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances (1)	$	20	$	1	$	19	$	—	$	—
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances (1)	$	1	$	1	$	—	$	—	$	33

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Assets
Futures	$	2	$	—	$	2	$	—	$	—
Mortgage-backed securities forwards	43		$	—	43		$	—	44
Interest rate swaps and swaptions (1)	35		—		35		—		30
Total derivative assets	$	80	$	—	$	80	$	—	$	74

Liabilities
Futures	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1
Mortgage-backed securities forwards	11		—		11		—		—
Interest rate swaps and swaptions (1)	37		—		37		—		20
Total derivative liabilities	$	48	$	—	$	48	$	—	$	21

(1)

At March 31, 2017, variation margin pledged to or received from a Central Counterparty Clearing House to cover the prior day’s fair value of open positions is considered settlement of the derivative position for accounting purposes. At December 31, 2016, variation margin was not recognized as settlement and we had an additional $15 million in variation margin in excess of the amounts disclosed above.

We pledged a total of $78 million of cash collateral to counterparties and had an obligation to return cash of $37 million at March 31, 2017 for derivative activities. We pledged a total of $54 million of cash collateral to counterparties and had an obligation to return cash of $74 million at December 31, 2016 for derivative activities. The net cash pledged is included in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

The net gain (loss) recognized in income on derivative instruments, net of the impact of offsetting positions, were as follows:

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
Location of Gain/(Loss) 2016 2015 2016 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
U.S. Treasury, swap and euro dollar futures Net (loss) return on mortgage servicing rights $ 4
$ 3
$ 8
$ 6
Interest rate swaps and swaptions Net (loss) return on mortgage servicing rights (7 ) 10
21
2
Mortgage backed securities forwards Net (loss) return on mortgage servicing rights 2
2
15
2
Rate lock commitments and forward agency and loan sales Net gain on loan sales 15
(24 ) 14
(4 )
Rate lock commitments Other noninterest income —
1
1
(1 )
Interest rate swaps Other noninterest income 2
2
3
2
Total derivative (loss) gain $ 16
$ (6 ) $ 62
$ 7

~~The notional amount, estimated fair value and maturity of our derivative financial instruments were as follows:~~

Notional Amount

Fair Value

Expiration Dates
(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2016
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Assets
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances $ 200
$ 3
2026
Liabilities (1)

Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances $ 825
$ 55
2023-2025
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Assets (2)

U.S. Treasury, swap and euro dollar futures $ 5,450
$ 1
2016-2019
Mortgage backed securities forwards 1,317
2
2016
Rate lock commitments 6,357
63
2016
       Interest rate swaps and swaptions 2,273
53
2016-2046
Total derivative assets $ 15,397
$ 119

Liabilities (1)

U.S. Treasury, swap and euro dollar futures $ 635
$ —
2019-2020
Mortgage backed securities forwards 5,849
24
2016
       Rate lock commitments 87
—
2016
Interest rate swaps 558
17
2016-2026
Total derivative liabilities $ 7,129
$ 41

December 31, 2015
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Liabilities (1)

Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances $ 825
$ 4
2023-2025
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Assets (2)

U.S. Treasury, swap and euro dollar futures $ 1,892
$ —
2016-2019
Mortgage backed securities forwards 1,931
7
2016
Rate lock commitments 3,593
26
2016
       Interest rate swaps and swaptions 1,554
25
2016-2035
Total derivative assets $ 8,970
$ 58

Liabilities (1)

U.S. Treasury, swap and euro dollar futures $ 768
$ 1
2016-2019
Mortgage backed securities forwards 2,655
6
2016
       Rate lock commitments 168
—
2016
Interest rate swaps 422
7
2016-2025
Total derivative liabilities $ 4,013
$ 14



		Three Months Ended March 31,
		2017			2016
		(Dollars in millions)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:	Location of Gain/(Loss)
Futures	Net return (loss) on mortgage servicing rights	$	—		$	3
Interest rate swaps and swaptions	Net return (loss) on mortgage servicing rights	(8		)	15
Mortgage-backed securities forwards	Net return (loss) on mortgage servicing rights	—			8
Rate lock commitments and forward agency and loan sales	Net (loss) gain on loan sales	(49		)	5
Rate lock commitments	Other noninterest income	—			1
Interest rate swaps (1)	Other noninterest income	—			2
Total derivative (loss) gain		$	(57	)	$	34


(1)	~~Derivative liabilities are included in other liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.~~Includes customer-initiated commercial interest rate swaps.


~~(2)~~	~~Derivative assets are included in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.~~

~~The following tables present the derivatives subject to a master netting arrangement, including the cash pledged as collateral:~~

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statement of Financial Position
Gross Amount Gross Amounts Netted in the Statement of Financial Position Net Amount Presented in the Statement of Financial Position Financial Instruments Cash Collateral
(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2016
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Assets
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances (1)
$ 3
$ 3
$ —
$ —
$ —
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances (1)
$ 55
$ 3
$ 52
$ —
$ 34

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Assets
U.S. Treasury, swap and euro dollar futures $ 1
$ —
$ 1
$ —
$ —
Mortgage backed securities forwards 2
—
2
—
—
Interest rate swaps and swaptions (1)
53
—
53
—
24
        Total derivative assets $ 56
$ —
$ 56
$ —
$ 24

Liabilities
U.S. Treasury, swap and euro dollar futures $ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ 2
Mortgage backed securities forwards 24
—
24
—
41
Interest rate swaps and swaptions (1)
17
—
17
—
7
        Total derivative liabilities $ 41
$ —
$ 41
$ —
$ 50

December 31, 2015
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Liabilities
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances $ 4
$ —
$ 4
$ —
$ 19

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Assets
Mortgage backed securities forwards $ 7
$ —
$ 7
$ —
$ 4
Interest rate swaps and swaptions (1)
25
—
25
—
10
        Total derivative assets $ 32
$ —
$ 32
$ —
$ 14

Liabilities
U.S. Treasury, swap and euro dollar futures $ 1
$ —
$ 1
$ —
$ 2
Mortgage backed securities forwards 6
—
6
—
8
Interest rate swaps and swaptions (1)
7
—
7
—
12
        Total derivative liabilities $ 14
$ —
$ 14
$ —
$ 22


~~(1)~~	Additional funds are pledged to a central counterparty clearing house in the amount of $56 million as of September 30, 2016 and $7 million as of December 31, 2015 to maintain initial margin requirements. This collateral is in addition to the amount required to be maintained for potential market changes shown in the cash collateral column above.

We pledged a total of $84 million of cash collateral to counterparties and had an obligation to return cash of $24 million at September 30, 2016 for derivative activities. We pledged a total of $41 million of cash collateral to counterparties and had an obligation to return cash of $14 million at December 31, 2015 for derivative activities. The net cash pledged is restricted and is included in other assets on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

Note 9 ~~– Debt~~- Borrowings

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances ~~and other~~

The following is a breakdown of our ~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~FHLB advances ~~and other short-term debt~~ outstanding:

September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Amount Rate Amount Rate
(Dollars in millions)
Short-term adjustable rate (1)
$ 20
0.67 % $ —
— %
Short-term fixed rate term advances 865
0.37 % 2,116
0.32 %
Other short-term (2)
20
0.55 % —
— %
Total Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other $ 905
$ 2,116

Long-term LIBOR adjustable advances 1,025
0.94 % 825
0.70 %
Long-term fixed rate advances (3)
552
1.44 % 600
1.37 %
Total Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances $ 1,577
$ 1,425

Total Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other $ 2,482
$ 3,541



	March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	Amount		Rate		Amount		Rate
	(Dollars in millions)
Short-term fixed rate term advances	$	3,186	0.87	%	$	1,780	0.62	%
Total Short-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances	3,186				1,780
Long-term LIBOR adjustable advances	1,025		1.27	%	1,025		1.12	%
Long-term fixed rate advances (1)	175		1.12	%	175		1.12	%
Total Long-term Federal Home Loan Bank advances	1,200				1,200
Total Federal Home Loan Bank advances	$	4,386			$	2,980


(1)	~~Includes short-term adjustable rate federal funds line of credit.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Other short-term debt consists of borrowings that settle through the Federal Reserve Bank.~~


~~(3)~~	Includes the current portion of fixed rate advances of ~~$125~~$175 million and ~~$175~~$50 million at ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

We settled ~~$375~~$250 million in long-term fixed rate ~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~FHLB advances during the fourth quarter ~~2015, which resulted in a gain on extinguishment of debt of $3 million, included in other noninterest income.~~2016.

We are required to maintain a minimum amount of qualifying collateral. In the event of default, the ~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~FHLB advance is similar to a secured borrowing, whereby the ~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~FHLB has the right to sell the pledged collateral to settle the fair value of the outstanding advances.

At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we had the authority and approval from the ~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~FHLB to utilize a line of credit of up to $7.0 billion and we may access that line to the extent that collateral is provided. At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, we had ~~$2.5~~$4.4 billion of advances outstanding and an additional ~~$2.0 billion~~$847 million of collateralized borrowing capacity available at the ~~Federal Home Loan Bank.~~FHLB. The advances can be collateralized by non-delinquent single-family residential first mortgage loans, loans with government guarantees, certain other loans and investment securities.

At ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, $1.0 billion of the outstanding advances were adjustable rate, with interest rates that reset every three months and are based on the three-month LIBOR index. ~~Interest rates on these advances reset every three months and the~~The advances may be prepaid without penalty, with notification at scheduled three month intervals after an initial 12 month lockout ~~period.~~period which begins on the date of settlement. The outstanding advances included $830 million in a cash flow hedge relationship as discussed in Note 8 - Derivative Financial Instruments.

The following table contains detailed information on our ~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~FHLB advances and other borrowings:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)												(Dollars in millions)
Maximum outstanding at any month end	$	3,182		$	2,127		$	3,557		$	2,198		$	4,386		$	3,557
Average outstanding balance	2,649			1,798			2,777			1,610			3,022			3,222
Average remaining borrowing capacity	1,626			1,738			1,106			1,711			1,673			704
Weighted average interest rate	1.26		%	1.17		%	1.25		%	1.05		%	1.18		%	1.10		%

The following table outlines the maturity dates of our ~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~FHLB advances and other ~~final maturity dates as of September 30, 2016:~~borrowings:


	September 30, 2016		March 31, 2017
	(Dollars in millions)		(Dollars in millions)
2016	$	1,030
2017	50		$	3,236
2018	125		125
2019	—		—
2020			—
Thereafter	1,277		1,025
Total	$	2,482	$	4,386

Parent Company Senior Notes and Trust Preferred Securities

The following table presents long-term ~~debt:~~debt, net of debt issuance costs:


									March 31, 2017				December 31, 2016
	September 30, 2016				December 31, 2015				Amount		Interest Rate		Amount		Interest Rate
	(Dollars in millions)								(Dollars in millions)
Senior Notes
Senior notes, matures 2021	$	246	6.125	%	$	—			$	246	6.125	%	$	246	6.125	%
Trust Preferred Securities
Floating Three Month LIBOR
Plus 3.25%, matures 2032	$	26	4.11	%	$	26	3.85	%	$	26	4.40	%	$	26	4.25	%
Plus 3.25%, matures 2033	26		3.93	%	26		3.57	%	26		4.27	%	26		4.13	%
Plus 3.25%, matures 2033	26		3.88	%	26		3.85	%	26		4.40	%	26		4.25	%
Plus 2.00%, matures 2035	26		2.68	%	26		2.32	%	26		3.02	%	26		2.88	%
Plus 2.00%, matures 2035	26		2.68	%	26		2.32	%	26		3.02	%	26		2.88	%
Plus 1.75%, matures 2035	51		2.60	%	51		2.26	%	51		2.88	%	51		2.71	%
Plus 1.50%, matures 2035	25		2.18	%	25		1.82	%	25		2.52	%	25		2.38	%
Plus 1.45%, matures 2037	25		2.30	%	25		1.96	%	25		2.58	%	25		2.41	%
Plus 2.50%, matures 2037	16		3.35	%	16		3.01	%	16		3.63	%	16		3.46	%
Total Trust Preferred Securities	$	247			$	247			247				247
Total long-term debt	$	493			$	247
Total other long-term debt									$	493			$	493

Senior Notes

On July 11, 2016, we issued $250 million of senior notes (“2021 Senior Notes”) which mature on July 15, 2021. The proceeds from these notes were used to bring dividends current and redeem our outstanding Series C Preferred Stock. The notes are unsecured and rank equally and ratably with the unsecured senior indebtedness of Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.

Prior to June 15, 2021, we may redeem some or all of the 2021 Senior Notes at a redemption price equal to the greater of 100 percent of the aggregate principal amount of the notes to be redeemed or the sum of the present values of the remaining

scheduled payments discounted to the redemption date on a semi-annual basis using a discount rate equal to the Treasury Rate plus 0.50 percent, plus, in each case accrued and unpaid interest.

Trust Preferred Securities

We sponsor nine trust subsidiaries, which issued preferred stock to third party investors. We issued trust preferred securities to those trusts, which we have included in long-term ~~debt which~~debt. The trust preferred securities are the sole assets of ~~the~~those trusts.

The trust preferred securities are callable by us at any time. Interest is payable quarterly; however, we may defer interest payments for up to 20 quarters without default or penalty. ~~In January 2012,~~As of March 31, 2017, we ~~exercised our contractual rights to defer interest payments. On July 14, 2016, we ended the deferral and made a $34 million payment to bring current our previously~~had no deferred ~~interest as of that date.~~interest.

Note 10 - Representation and Warranty Reserve

At the time a loan is sold, an estimate of the fair value of the guarantee associated with the mortgage loans is recorded in the representation and warranty reserve in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition which reduces the net gain on loan sales in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Subsequent to the sale, the liability is re-measured on an ongoing basis based on an estimate of probable losses. Changes in the estimate are recorded in the representation and warranty ~~provision (benefit)~~(provision) benefit on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The following table shows the activity impacting the representation and warranty reserve:

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Balance, beginning of period $ 36
$ 48
$ 40
$ 53
Provision (benefit)
Gain on sale reduction for representation and warranty liability 1
2
4
6
Representation and warranty provision (benefit) (6 ) (6 ) (12 ) (13 )
Total (5 ) (4 ) (8 ) (7 )
Charge-offs, net 1
1
—
(1 )
Balance, end of period $ 32
$ 45
$ 32
$ 45

Due to our sustained low level of charge-offs and a lower level of demands received, we have reduced our estimate of probable losses related to our representation and warranty liability as of September 30, 2016 compared to September 30, 2015.



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Balance at beginning of period	$	27		$	40
Provision (benefit)
Gain on sale reduction for representation and warranty liability	—			2
Representation and warranty provision (benefit)	(4		)	(2		)
Total	(4		)	—
Balance at end of period	$	23		$	40

Note 11 —- Warrants and Restricted Stock Units

May Investor Warrant

We granted warrants (the "May Investor Warrants") on January 30, 2009 under anti-dilution provisions applicable to certain investors (the "May Investors") in our May 2008 private placement capital raise.

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, 32,721~~237,627 May Investor Warrants were exercised during the three months ended March 31, 2017, resulting in the issuance of ~~21,068~~154,313 shares of Common Stock. ~~The May Investors held warrants to purchase 583,240 shares at an exercise price of $10.00 at September 30, 2016.~~

~~The~~There are no remaining May Investor Warrants ~~do not meet the definition~~outstanding as of ~~a contract that is indexed~~March 31, 2017.

At March 31, 2017, due to ~~our own stock under U.S. GAAP. Therefore, the~~all remaining May Investor Warrants are classified as other liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition and are measured at fair value. Warrant liabilities are valued using a Black Scholes model and are classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. Significant observable inputs include share price, expected volatility, a risk free rate and an expected life. The warrants are accounted for under the equity method.

~~At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015,~~being exercised, the liability from May Investors Warrants amounted to ~~$10 million and $8 million, respectively. See~~zero. At December 31, 2016, the liability was $4 million. For further information, see Note 17 ~~of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, herein, for further recurring fair value disclosures.~~- Fair Value Measurements.

TARP Warrant

On January 30, 2009, in conjunction with the sale of 266,657 shares of Series C fixed rate cumulative non-convertible perpetual preferred stock ("Series C Preferred Stock"), for $267 million, we issued a warrant to purchase up to approximately 645,138 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $62.00 per share (the "Warrant") ~~for $267 million.~~.

The Warrant is exercisable through January 30, 2019 and remains ~~outstanding subsequent to~~outstanding.

Restricted Stock Units

We had stock-based compensation expense of $4 million for the ~~redemption of TARP, which occurred during the third quarter 2016.~~ three months ended March 31, 2017.

The following table summarizes restricted stock activity:



	Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Shares		Weighted — Average Grant-Date Fair Value per Share
Restricted Stock
Non-vested balance at beginning of period	1,461,910		$	17.68
Granted	85,892		26.60
Vested	(79,712	)	21.34
Canceled and forfeited	(2,197	)	22.19
Non-vested balance at end of period	1,465,893		$	18.00

Note 12 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table sets forth the components in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ~~for each type of investment securities available-for-sale, investment securities held-to-maturity, and cash flow hedges:~~:

Held-to-Maturity Securities Available-for-Sale Securities Cash Flow Hedges Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Net of Tax
(Dollars in millions)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) ("AOCI")
Balance at December 31, 2015, net of tax $ 5
$ —
$ (3 ) $ 2
Net unrealized loss, net of tax —
17
(44 ) (27 )
Reclassifications out of AOCI (1 ) (4 ) 10
5
Balance at September 30, 2016, net of tax
$ 4
$ 13
$ (37 ) $ (20 )

Balance at December 31, 2014, net of tax $ —
$ 8
$ —
$ 8
Net unrealized gain, net of tax —
9
(5 ) 4
Transfer of net unrealized loss from AFS to HTM 5
(5 ) —
—
Balance at September 30, 2015, net of tax $ 5
$ 12
$ (5 ) $ 12



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)
Investment securities
Beginning balance	$	(8	)	$	5
Unrealized gain (loss)	—			24
Less: Tax (benefit) provision	—			9
Net unrealized gain (loss)	—			15
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	—			15
Ending balance	$	(8	)	$	20

Cash Flow Hedges
Beginning balance	$	1		$	(3	)
Unrealized gain (loss)	2			(48		)
Less: Tax (benefit) provision	1			(16		)
Net unrealized gain (loss)	1			(32		)
Reclassifications out of AOCI (1)	—			4
Less: Tax (benefit) provision	—			—
Net unrealized gain (loss) reclassified out of AOCI	—			4
Other comprehensive income/(loss), net of tax	1			(28		)
Ending balance	$	2		$	(31	)


(1)	Reclassifications are reported in other noninterest income on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

Note 13 –- Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share, excluding dilution, is computed by dividing earnings ~~available~~applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised and converted into common stock or resulted in the issuance of common stock that could then share in our earnings.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share of common stock:

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
(Dollars in millions, except share data)

Net income $ 57
$ 47
$ 143
$ 125
Deferred cumulative preferred stock dividends (2 ) (8 ) (18 ) (22 )
Net income applicable to common stockholders $ 55
$ 39
$ 125
$ 103
Weighted average shares
Weighted average common shares outstanding 56,580,238
56,436,026
56,556,188
56,419,354
Effect of dilutive securities
May Investor warrants 364,791
339,478
339,893
290,840
Stock-based awards 988,777
431,999
831,181
340,595
Weighted average diluted common shares 57,933,806
57,207,503
57,727,262
57,050,789
Earnings per common share
Basic earnings per common share $ 0.98
$ 0.70
$ 2.21
$ 1.82
Effect of dilutive securities
May Investor warrants —
—
(0.02 ) (0.01 )
Stock-based awards (0.02 ) (0.01 ) (0.03 ) (0.01 )
Diluted earnings per share $ 0.96
$ 0.69
$ 2.16
$ 1.80

~~On July 29, 2016, we completed the previously announced $267 million redemption of our Series C Preferred Stock. This transaction reduced stockholders equity by approximately $372 million with a$267 million reduction in Preferred Stock and a $105 million reduction related to the payment of deferred dividends.~~



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions, except share data)
Net income	$	27		$	39
Deferred cumulative preferred stock dividends	—			(8		)
Net income applicable to common stockholders	$	27		$	31
Weighted average shares
Weighted average common shares outstanding	56,921,605			56,513,715
Effect of dilutive securities
May Investor Warrants	49,149			305,219
Stock-based awards	1,101,809			782,050
Weighted average diluted common shares	58,072,563			57,600,984
Earnings per common share
Basic earnings per common share	$	0.47		$	0.56
Effect of dilutive securities
May Investor Warrants	—			—
Stock-based awards	(0.01		)	(0.02		)
Diluted earnings per common share	$	0.46		$	0.54

Under the terms of the Series C Preferred Stock the Company ~~was able~~elected to defer payments of ~~dividends. We elected to defer dividend payments~~preferred stock dividends beginning with the February 2012 dividend. Although, while being deferred, the impact was not included in quarterly net income from continuing operations, the deferral ~~still impacted~~did impact net income applicable to common stock for the purpose of calculating earnings per share, as shown above. On July 29, 2016, we completed the previously announced $267 million redemption of our Series C Preferred Stock.

Note 14 –- Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes in interim periods requires us to make a best estimate of the effective tax rate expected to be applicable for the full year. This estimated effective tax rate is then applied to interim consolidated pre-tax operating income to determine the interim provision for income taxes.


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015			2016			2015			2017			2016
	(Dollars in millions)												(Dollars in millions)
Provision for income taxes	$	30		$	24		$	73		$	70		$	13		$	21
Effective tax provision rate	34.3		%	34.4		%	33.8		%	36.0		%	33.1		%	34.3		%

We believe that it is unlikely that the unrecognized tax benefits will change by a material amount during the next 12 months. We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in provision for income taxes.

Note 15 —- Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Capital

We, along with the Bank, must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that could have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements. On January 1, 2015, the Basel III rules became effective and include transition provisions through 2018.

To be categorized as "well-capitalized," the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum tangible capital, Tier 1 capital, common equity Tier 1, and total capital ratios as set forth in the table below. We, along with the Bank, are considered "well-capitalized" at both ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015. There have been no conditions or events that management believes have changed our or the Bank’s category.~~2016.

The following ~~table shows~~tables present the regulatory capital ratios as of the dates indicated:


Bancorp	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions				Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in millions)												(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2016
March 31, 2017
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)	$	1,225	8.88	%	N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		$	1,277	9.31	%	N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted tangible assets)	1,225		8.88	%	$	552	4.00	%	$	690	5.00	%	1,277		9.31	%	$	549	4.00	%	$	686	5.00	%
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to RWA)	1,056		12.04	%	395		4.50	%	570		6.50	%	1,071		12.32	%	391		4.50	%	565		6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	1,225		13.98	%	526		6.00	%	701		8.00	%	1,277		14.70	%	521		6.00	%	695		8.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	1,338		15.26	%	701		8.00	%	877		10.00	%	1,389		15.98	%	695		8.00	%	869		10.00	%
December 31, 2015
December 31, 2016
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)	$	1,435	11.51	%	N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A		$	1,256	8.88	%	N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted tangible assets)	1,435		11.51	%	$	499	4.0	%	$	624	5.0	%	1,256		8.88	%	$	566	4.0	%	$	707	5.0	%
Common equity Tier 1 capital (to RWA)	1,065		14.09	%	340		4.5	%	491		6.5	%	1,084		13.06	%	374		4.5	%	540		6.5	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	1,435		18.98	%	454		6.0	%	605		8.0	%	1,256		15.12	%	498		6.0	%	664		8.0	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	1,534		20.28	%	605		8.0	%	756		10.0	%	1,363		16.41	%	664		8.0	%	830		10.0	%

N/A - Not applicable



Bank	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
	(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2017
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)	$	1,477	10.74	%	N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted tangible assets)	1,477		10.74	%	$	550	4.00	%	$	688	5.00	%
Common equity tier 1 capital (to RWA)	1,477		16.93	%	393		4.50	%	567		6.50	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	1,477		16.93	%	524		6.00	%	698		8.00	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	1,588		18.20	%	698		8.00	%	873		10.00	%
December 31, 2016
Tangible capital (to tangible assets)	$	1,491	10.52	%	N/A		N/A		N/A		N/A
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted tangible assets)	1,491		10.52	%	$	567	4.0	%	$	709	5.0	%
Common equity tier 1 capital (to RWA)	1,491		17.90	%	375		4.5	%	542		6.5	%
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets)	1,491		17.90	%	500		6.0	%	667		8.0	%
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets)	1,598		19.18	%	667		8.0	%	833		10.0	%

N/A - Not applicable

Bank Actual For Capital Adequacy Purposes Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2016
Tangible capital (to tangible assets) $ 1,459
10.55 % N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted tangible assets) 1,459
10.55 % $ 553
4.00 % $ 691
5.00 %
Common equity tier 1 capital (to RWA) 1,459
16.59 % 396
4.50 % 572
6.50 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) 1,459
16.59 % 528
6.00 % 704
8.00 %
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) 1,571
17.87 % 704
8.00 % 879
10.00 %
December 31, 2015
Tangible capital (to tangible assets) $ 1,472
11.79 % N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Tier 1 capital (to adjusted tangible assets) 1,472
11.79 % $ 500
4.0 % $ 625
5.0 %
Common equity tier 1 capital (to RWA) 1,472
19.42 % 341
4.5 % 493
6.5 %
Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) 1,472
19.42 % 455
6.0 % 607
8.0 %
Total capital (to risk-weighted assets) 1,570
20.71 % 607
8.0 % 758
10.0 %

~~N/A - Not applicable~~

Note 16 –- Legal Proceedings, Contingencies and Commitments

Legal Proceedings

We and our subsidiaries are subject to various pending or threatened legal proceedings arising out of the normal course of business operations. In addition, the Bank is routinely named in civil actions throughout the country by borrowers and former borrowers relating to the origination, purchase, sale, and servicing of mortgage loans. From time to time, governmental agencies also conduct investigations or examinations of various mortgage-related practices of the Bank. In the course of such investigations or examinations, the Bank cooperates with such agencies and provides information as requested.

We assess the liabilities and loss contingencies in connection with ~~such~~ pending or threatened legal and regulatory proceedings on at least a quarterly basis and establish accruals when we believe it is probable that a loss may be incurred and that the amount of such loss can be reasonably estimated. Once established, litigation accruals are adjusted, as appropriate, in light of additional information.

Management does not believe that the amount of any reasonably possible losses in excess of any amounts accrued with respect to ongoing proceedings or any other known claims will be material to our financial statements, or that the ultimate outcome of these actions will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

DOJ litigation settlement

In 2012, the Bank entered into a Settlement Agreement with the ~~United States Department of Justice ("DOJ")~~DOJ which meets the definition of a financial liability (the "DOJ Liability").

In accordance with the Settlement Agreement, we made an initial payment of $15 million and agreed to make future annual payments totaling $118 million. The Settlement Agreement provides that the Bank will make annual payments in increments of up to $25 million towards the $118 million still due upon meeting all conditions which are evaluated quarterly and include: (a) the reversal of the ~~deferred tax asset~~DTA valuation allowance, which occurred at the end of 2013; (b) the repayment of the Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (the "TARP Preferred"), which occurred in the ~~current~~third quarter ~~(or, in the absence~~ of ~~repayment, adjusting our Bank Tier 1 Capital Ratio for any unextinguished TARP Preferred);~~2016; (c) our Bank’s Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio is 11 percent or more. Additionally, if the Bank and Bancorp become party to a business combination in which the Bank or Bancorp represent less than 33.3 percent of the resulting company’s assets, such annual payments must commence twelve months after the date of that business combination.

fulfill the conditions, and will not undertake any conduct or fail to take any action the purpose of which is to frustrate or delay our ability to fulfill any of the above conditions.

We elected to account for the DOJ Liability under the fair value option. To determine the fair value, we utilize a discounted cash flow model. Key assumptions for the discounted cash flow model include using a discount rate as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 of ~~7.2~~8.6 percent; probability weightings of multiple cash flow scenarios and possible outcomes which contemplate the above conditions and estimates of forecasted net income, size of the balance sheet, capital levels, dividends and their impact on the timing of cash payments and the assumptions we believe a market participant would make to transfer the liability. The fair value of the DOJ Liability was $60 million ~~and $84 million~~ at ~~September 30, 2016~~both March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015, respectively.~~

The lower value resulted from a change in the expectation as to the timing of payments to the DOJ as a result of a $200 million dividend from the Bank to the Bancorp and the issuance of $250 million in Senior Notes, both of which occurred in July 2016, to a) bring current the interest payments on our trust preferred securities, b) become current on our deferred interest and dividends related to our TARP Preferred and c) repay our TARP Preferred. To support the on-going debt service and other Bancorp expenses, we also intend to reduce our Bancorp double leverage and debt to equity ratios to be more consistent with such ratios at other mid-sized banks, which would likely require further dividend payments from the Bank to the Bancorp for the foreseeable future.2016.

Other litigation accruals

At ~~September 30, 2016~~both March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, excluding the fair value liability relating to the DOJ litigation settlement, our total accrual for contingent liabilities, ~~and~~ settled litigation and regulatory matters was ~~$6 million and $2 million, respectively.~~$3 million.

Commitments

A summary of the contractual amount of significant commitments is as follows:


	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
	(Dollars in millions)				(Dollars in millions)
Commitments to extend credit
Mortgage loans interest-rate lock commitments	$	6,503	$	3,792	$	4,704	$	4,115
Warehouse loan commitments					1,623		1,670
Commercial and industrial commitments					521		424
Other commercial commitments					774		651
HELOC commitments	295		150		183		179
Other consumer commitments	9		22		37		57
Warehouse loan commitments	1,123		871
Standby and commercial letters of credit	24		13		37		30
Commercial and industrial commitments	165		151
Other commercial commitments	851		497

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend. Since many of these commitments expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash flow requirements. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. We evaluate each customer's credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by us, upon extension of credit is based on management's credit evaluation of the counterparties.

We enter into mortgage interest-rate lock commitments with our customers. These commitments are considered to be derivative instruments and changes in the fair value of these commitments are recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition in other assets. Further discussion on derivative instruments is included in Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, herein.

We have unfunded commitments under our contractual arrangement with the HELOC borrowers. Commitments to extend, originate or purchase credit are primarily lines of credit to consumers and have specified rates and maturity dates. Many of these commitments also have adverse change clauses, which allow us to cancel the commitment due to deterioration in the borrowers’ creditworthiness.

Other consumer commitments are conditional commitments issued to accommodate the financial needs of customers. The commitments are under various terms to lend funds to consumers, which include revolving credit agreements, term loan commitments and short-term borrowing agreements.

Warehouse loan commitments are lines of credit provided to mortgage originators to fund loans they originate and then sell. The proceeds of the sale of the loans are used to repay the draw on the line used to fund the loans.

Standby and commercial letters of credit are conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party, while commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate commerce and typically result in the commitment being drawn on when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and the third party.

Commercial and industrial and other commercial commitments are conditional commitments issued under various terms to lend funds to business and other entities. These commitments include revolving credit agreements, term loan commitments and short-term borrowing agreements. Many of these loan commitments have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of these commitments are expected to expire without being funded, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements.

These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk beyond the amount recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition. Our exposure to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. We utilize the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as we do for balance sheet instruments. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is not a violation of any condition established in the contract. The types of credit we extend are as follows:

Mortgage loan interest-rate lock commitments. We enter into mortgage interest-rate lock commitments with our customers. These commitments are considered to be derivative instruments and the fair value of these commitments is recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition in other assets. For further information, see Note 8 - Derivative Financial Instruments.

Warehouse loan commitments. Lines of credit provided to mortgage originators to fund loans they originate and then sell. The proceeds of the sale of the loans are used to repay the draw on the line used to fund the loans.

Commercial and industrial and other commercial commitments. Conditional commitments issued under various terms to lend funds to business and other entities. These commitments include revolving credit agreements, term loan commitments and short-term borrowing agreements. Many of these loan commitments have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of these commitments are expected to expire without being funded, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements.

HELOC commitments. Commitments to extend, originate or purchase credit are primarily lines of credit to consumers and have specified rates and maturity dates. Many of these commitments also have adverse change clauses, which allow us to cancel the commitment due to deterioration in the borrowers’ creditworthiness and due to a decline in the collateral value.

Other consumer commitments. Conditional commitments issued to accommodate the financial needs of customers. The commitments are under various terms to lend funds to consumers, which include revolving credit agreements, term loan commitments and short-term borrowing agreements.

Standby and commercial letters of credit. Conditional commitments issued to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally are contingent upon the failure of the customer to perform according to the terms of the underlying contract with the third party, while commercial letters of credit are issued specifically to facilitate commerce and typically result in the commitment being drawn on when the underlying transaction is consummated between the customer and the third party.

We maintain a reserve for the estimate of probable credit losses inherent in unfunded commitments to extend credit. Unfunded commitments to extend credit include unfunded loans with available balances, new commitments to lend that are not yet funded, and standby and commercial letters of credit. ~~The~~A reserve balance of $3 million, ~~and $2 million for September 30, 2016~~at March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015, respectively,~~2016, is reflected in other liabilities on the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition.

As of March 31, 2017, we have made commitments to sell $65 million of our MSR assets with sub-servicing retained. These sales are expected to close in the second quarter of 2017.

Note 17 –- Fair Value Measurements

We utilize fair value measurements to record or disclose the fair value on certain assets and liabilities. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability through an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The determination of fair values of financial instruments often requires the use of estimates. In cases where quoted market values in an active market are not available, we use present value techniques and other valuation methods to estimate the fair values of our financial instruments. These valuation models rely on market-based parameters when available, such as interest rate yield curves or credit spreads. Unobservable inputs may be based on management's judgment, assumptions and estimates related to credit quality, our future earnings, interest rates and other relevant inputs. These valuation methods require considerable judgment and the resulting estimates of fair value can be significantly affected by the assumptions made and methods used. Refer to Note 2422 - Fair Value Measurements to the consolidated financial statements of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016, for a description of our valuation methodologies and information about the fair value hierarchy.

Valuation Hierarchy

U.S. GAAP establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements. The hierarchy is based on the transparency of the inputs used in the valuation process with the highest priority given to quoted prices available in active markets and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs where no active market exists, as discussed below.

Level 1 - Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets in which we can participate as of the measurement date;

Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, and other inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that reflect our own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

A financial instrument's categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input within the valuation hierarchy that is significant to the overall fair value measurement. Transfers between levels of the fair value hierarchy are recognized at the end of the reporting period.

Assets and ~~liabilities measured~~Liabilities Measured at ~~fair value~~Fair Value on a ~~recurring basis.~~Recurring Basis.

The following tables present the financial instruments carried at fair value as of ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, by caption on the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition and by level in the valuation hierarchy.

Level 1 Level 2 Level 3
Total Fair
Value
September 30, 2016 (Dollars in millions)
Investment securities available-for-sale
Agency - Commercial $ —
$ 510
$ —
$ 510
Agency - Residential —
573
—
573
Municipal obligations —
32
—
32
Loans held-for-sale
Residential first mortgage loans —
3,352
—
3,352
Loans held-for-investment
Residential first mortgage loans —
8
—
8
Second mortgage loans —
—
41
41
HELOC loans —
—
31
31
Mortgage servicing rights —
—
302
302
Derivative assets
Rate lock commitments —
—
63
63
U.S. Treasury, swap and euro dollar futures 1
—
—
1
Mortgage backed securities forwards —
2
—
2
Interest rate swaps and swaptions —
53
—
53
Total derivative assets 1
55
63
119
Total assets at fair value $ 1
$ 4,530
$ 437
$ 4,968
Derivative liabilities
Interest rate swap on FHLB advances $ —
$ (52 ) $ —
$ (52 )
Mortgage backed securities forwards —
(24 ) —
(24 )
Interest rate swaps and swaptions —
(17 ) —
(17 )
Total derivative liabilities —
(93 ) —
(93 )
Warrant liabilities —
(10 ) —
(10 )
DOJ litigation settlement —
—
(60 ) (60 )
Total liabilities at fair value $ —
$ (103 ) $ (60 ) $ (163 )


	Level 1			Level 2			Level 3			Total Fair Value			March 31, 2017
December 31, 2015	(Dollars in millions)
													Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Total Fair Value
													(Dollars in millions)
Investment securities available-for-sale
Agency - Commercial	$	—		$	766		$	—		$	766		$	—	$	532		$	—		$	532
Agency - Residential	—			514			—			514			—		1,063			—			1,063
Municipal obligations	—			14			—			14			—		36			—			36
Corporate debt obligations													—		19			—			19
Loans held-for-sale
Residential first mortgage loans	—			2,541			—			2,541			—		4,458			—			4,458
Second mortgage loans													—		—			39			39
HELOC loans													—		—			14			14
Loans held-for-investment
Residential first mortgage loans	—			6			—			6			—		8			—			8
Second mortgage loans	—			—			42			42			—		—			4			4
HELOC loans	—			—			64			64			—		—			1			1
Mortgage servicing rights	—			—			296			296			—		—			295			295
Derivative assets
Rate lock commitments	—			—			26			26
Mortgage backed securities forwards	—			7			—			7
Rate lock commitments (fallout-adjusted)													—		—			41			41
Futures													1		—			—			1
Mortgage-backed securities forwards													—		3			—			3
Interest rate swaps and swaptions	—			25			—			25			—		32			—			32
Total derivative assets	—			32			26			58
Total assets at fair value	$	—		$	3,873		$	428		$	4,301		$	1	$	6,151		$	394		$	6,546
Derivative liabilities
U.S. Treasury, swap and euro dollar futures	$	(1	)	$	—		$	—		$	(1	)
Interest rate swap on FHLB advances (net)													$	—	$	(1	)	$	—		$	(1	)
Mortgage backed securities forwards	—			(6		)	—			(6		)	—		(38		)	—			(38		)
Interest rate swap on FHLB advances	—			(4		)	—			(4		)
Interest rate swaps	—			(7		)	—			(7		)	—		(3		)	—			(3		)
Total derivative liabilities	(1		)	(17		)	—			(18		)
Warrant liabilities	—			(8		)	—			(8		)
DOJ litigation settlement	—			—			(84		)	(84		)	—		—			(60		)	(60		)
Total liabilities at fair value	$	(1	)	$	(25	)	$	(84	)	$	(110	)	$	—	$	(42	)	$	(60	)	$	(102	)

~~We had~~



	December 31, 2016
	Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Total Fair Value
	(Dollars in millions)
Investment securities available-for-sale
Agency - Commercial	$	—	$	548		$	—		$	548
Agency - Residential	—		898			—			898
Municipal obligations	—		34			—			34
Loans held-for-sale
Residential first mortgage loans	—		3,145			—			3,145
Loans held-for-investment
Residential first mortgage loans	—		7			—			7
Second mortgage loans	—		—			41			41
HELOC loans	—		—			24			24
Mortgage servicing rights	—		—			335			335
Derivative assets
Rate lock commitments (fallout-adjusted)	—		—			24			24
Futures	2		—			—			2
Mortgage backed securities forwards	—		43			—			43
Interest rate swaps and swaptions	—		35			—			35
Interest rate swaps on FHLB advances (net)	—		19			—			19
Total assets at fair value	$	2	$	4,729		$	424		$	5,155
Derivative liabilities
Rate lock commitments (fallout-adjusted)	$	—	$	—		$	(6	)	$	(6	)
Mortgage backed securities forwards	—		(11		)	—			(11		)
Interest rate swaps	—		(37		)	—			(37		)
Warrant liabilities	—		(4		)	—			(4		)
DOJ litigation settlement	—		—			(60		)	(60		)
Total liabilities at fair value	$	—	$	(52	)	$	(66	)	$	(118	)

There were no transfers ~~of assets or liabilities recorded at fair value~~ between ~~fair value levels~~Level 1 and Level 2 during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016 and 2015.~~March 31, 2017.

Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs

The tables below include a roll forward of the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition amounts (including the change in fair value) for financial instruments classified by us within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy:



				Recorded in Earnings					Recorded in OCI
	Balance at Beginning of Period			Total Unrealized Gains / (Losses)			Total Realized Gains / (Losses)		Total Unrealized Gains / (Losses)		Purchases / Originations		Sales			Settlements			Transfers In (Out)			Balance at End of Period
	(Dollars in millions)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
Assets
Loans held-for-sale
Second mortgage loans	$	—		$	4		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	35		$	39
HELOC loans	—			(3		)	—		—		—		—			—			17			14
Loans held-for-investment
Second mortgage loans	41			—			—		—		—		—			(2		)	(35		)	4
HELOC loans	24			1			—		—		—		—			(4		)	(20		)	1
Mortgage servicing rights	335			4			—		—		21		(65		)	—			—			295
Rate lock commitments (net) (1)	18			16			—		—		53		—			—			(46		)	41
Totals	$	418		$	22		$	—	$	—	$	74	$	(65	)	$	(6	)	$	(49	)	$	394
Liabilities
DOJ litigation settlement	$	(60	)	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(60	)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
Assets
Loans held-for-investment
Second mortgage loans	$	42		$	1		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	(3	)	$	—		$	40
HELOC loans	64			—			—		—		—		—			(9		)	—			55
Mortgage servicing rights	296			(48		)	—		—		57		(24		)	—			—			281
Rate lock commitments (1)	26			62			—		—		68		—			—			(95		)	61
Totals	$	428		$	15		$	—	$	—	$	125	$	(24	)	$	(12	)	$	(95	)	$	437
Liabilities
DOJ litigation settlement	$	(84	)	$	—		$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	(84	)


(1)	Rate lock commitments are reported on a fallout adjusted basis. Transfers out of Level 3 represent the settlement value of the commitments that are transferred to LHFS, which are classified as Level 2 assets.

We utilized swaptions ~~swap and euro dollars~~ futures, forward agency and loan sales and interest rate swaps to manage the risk associated with ~~mortgage servicing rights~~MSRs and rate lock commitments. Gains and losses for individual lines in the tables do not reflect the effect of our risk management activities related to such level 3 instruments.

~~Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs~~

The tables below include a roll forward of the Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition amounts for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 (including the change in fair value) for financial instruments classified by us within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy:

Recorded in Earnings Recorded in OCI
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
Total Unrealized Gains / (Losses) Total Realized Gains / (Losses) Total Unrealized Gains / (Losses) Purchases / Originations Sales Settlements Transfers In (Out)
Balance at
End of
Period
Assets (Dollars in millions)
Loans held-for-investment
Second mortgage loans $ 38
$ (2 ) $ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ (3 ) $ 8
$ 41
HELOC loans 44
6
—
—
—
—
(11 ) (8 ) 31
Mortgage servicing rights 301
(33 ) —
—
51
(17 ) —
—
302
Totals
$ 383
$ (29 ) $ —
$ —
$ 51
$ (17 ) $ (14 ) $ —
$ 374
Liabilities
DOJ litigation settlement $ (84 ) $ 24
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ (60 )
Derivative financial instruments (net)
Rate lock commitments $ 82
$ 33
$ —
$ —
$ 116
$ (150 ) $ (18 ) $ —
$ 63

Three Months Ended September 30, 2015
Assets
Other investments $ 100
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ 100
Loans held-for-investment
Second mortgage loans 48
—
—
—
—
—
(3 ) —
45
HELOC loans 93
2
—
—
—
—
(15 ) —
80
Mortgage servicing rights 317
(24 ) —
—
74
(73 ) —
—
294
Totals $ 558
$ (22 ) $ —
$ —
$ 74
$ (73 ) $ (18 ) $ —
$ 519
Liabilities
Long-term debt $ (36 ) $ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ 4
$ —
$ (32 )
DOJ litigation settlement (84 ) —
—
—
—
—
—
—
(84 )
Totals $ (120 ) $ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ 4
$ —
$ (116 )
Derivative financial instruments (net)
Rate lock commitments $ 30
$ 53
$ —
$ —
$ 81
$ (104 ) $ (16 ) $ —
$ 44

Recorded in Earnings Recorded in OCI
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Balance at
Beginning of
Period
Total Unrealized Gains / (Losses) Total Realized Gains / (Losses) Total Unrealized Gains / (Losses) Purchases / Originations Sales Settlements Transfers In (Out)
Balance at
End of
Period
Assets (Dollars in millions)
Loans held-for-investment
Second mortgage loans $ 42
$ (1 ) $ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ (8 ) 8
41
HELOC loans 64
3
—
—
—
—
(28 ) (8 ) 31
Mortgage servicing rights 296
(126 ) —
—
173
(41 ) —
—
302
Totals $ 402
$ (124 ) $ —
$ —
$ 173
$ (41 ) $ (36 ) $ —
$ 374
Liabilities
DOJ litigation $ (84 ) $ 24
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
—
$ (60 )
Derivative financial instruments (net)
Rate lock commitments $ 26
$ 153
$ —
$ —
$ 303
$ (371 ) $ (48 ) $ —
$ 63

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Assets
Other investments $ 100
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ —
$ 100
Investment securities available-for-sale
Municipal obligation 2
—
—
—
—
—
(2 ) —
—
Loans held-for-investment
Second mortgage loans 53
2
1
—
—
—
(11 ) —
45
HELOC loans 132
(4 ) —
—
—
—
(48 ) —
80
Mortgage servicing rights 258
(40 ) —
—
220
(144 ) —
—
294
Totals $ 545
$ (42 ) $ 1
$ —
$ 220
$ (144 ) $ (61 ) $ —
$ 519
Liabilities
Long-term debt $ (84 ) $ —
$ (3 ) $ —
$ —
$ 24
$ 31
$ —
$ (32 )
DOJ litigation (82 ) (2 ) —
—
—
—
—
—
(84 )
Totals $ (166 ) $ (2 ) $ (3 ) $ —
$ —
$ 24
$ 31
$ —
$ (116 )
Derivative financial instruments (net)
Rate lock commitments $ 31
$ 60
$ —
$ —
$ 272
$ (276 ) $ (43 ) $ —
$ 44

The following tables present the quantitative information about recurring level 3 fair value financial instruments and the fair value measurements as ~~of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:~~of:


	Fair Value			Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)	Fair Value			Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
September 30, 2016	(Dollars in millions)
							(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2017
Assets
Loans held-for-sale
Second mortgage loans							$	39		Discounted cash flows	Discount rate Constant prepayment rate Constant default rate	10.2% - 15.3% (12.8%) 12.0% - 18.0% (15.0%) 3.0% - 4.5% (3.7%)
HELOC loans							$	14		Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	5.8% - 8.7% (7.2%)
Loans held-for-investment
Second mortgage loans	$	41		Discounted cash flows	Discount rate Constant prepayment rate Constant default rate	8.0% - 12.0% (10.0%) 10.9% - 16.4% (13.6%) 2.7% - 4.1% (3.4%)	$	4		Discounted cash flows	Discount rate Constant prepayment rate Constant default rate	10.2% - 15.3% (12.8%) 12.0% - 18.0% (15.0%) 3.0% - 4.5% (3.7%)
HELOC loans	$	31		Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	6.6% - 9.9% (8.2%)	$	1		Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	5.8% - 8.7% (7.2%)
Mortgage servicing rights	$	302		Discounted cash flows	Option adjusted spread Constant prepayment rate Weighted average cost to service per loan	7.4% - 11.0% (9.2%) 12.8% - 18.5% (15.7%) $57 - $85 ($71)	$	295		Discounted cash flows	Option adjusted spread Constant prepayment rate Weighted average cost to service per loan	5.3% - 7.9% (6.6%) 7.3% - 10.7% (9.0%) $54 - $82 ($68)
Rate lock commitments (net)							$	41		Consensus pricing	Origination pull-through rate	65.5% - 98.3% (81.9%)
Liabilities
DOJ litigation settlement	$	(60	)	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	5.7% - 8.5% (7.1%)	$	(60	)	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate Asset growth rate	6.9% - 10.4% (8.6%) 1.0% - 18.1% (3.7%)
Derivative financial instruments
Rate lock commitments	$	63		Consensus pricing	Origination pull-through rate	66.6% - 99.9% (83.3%)


	Fair Value			Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)	Fair Value			Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
December 31, 2015	(Dollars in millions)
							(Dollars in millions)
December 31, 2016
Assets
Second mortgage loans	$	42		Discounted cash flows	Discount rate Constant prepayment rate Constant default rate	7.2% - 10.8% (9.0%)13.5% - 20.2% (16.9%) 2.6% - 4.0% (3.3%)	$	41		Discounted cash flows	Discount rate Constant prepayment rate Constant default rate	8.1% - 12.2% (10.2%) 16.3% - 24.4% (20.3%) 2.7% - 4.1% (3.7%)
HELOC loans	$	64		Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	6.8% - 10.1% (8.4%)	$	24		Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	6.0% - 9.0% (7.5%)
Mortgage servicing rights	$	296		Discounted cash flows	Option adjusted spread Constant prepayment rate Weighted average cost to service per loan	6.6% - 9.9% (8.2%) 10.3% - 14.8% (12.6%) $57 - $86 ($72)	$	335		Discounted cash flows	Option adjusted spread Constant prepayment rate Weighted average cost to service per loan	6.2% - 9.3% (7.8%) 13.9% - 19.2% (16.7%) $55 - $82 ($68)
Rate lock commitments (net)							$	18		Consensus pricing	Origination pull-through rate	66.9% - 100.0% (83.6%)
Liabilities
DOJ litigation settlement	$	(84	)	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate	4.9% - 9.5% (7.2%)	$	(60	)	Discounted cash flows	Discount rate Asset growth rate	6.6% - 9.8% (8.2%) 4.2% - 11.6% (7.9%)
Derivative financial instruments
Rate lock commitments	$	26		Consensus pricing	Origination pull-through rate	67.6% - 101.5% (84.6%)

Recurring Significant Unobservable Inputs

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the second mortgage loans are discount rates, constant prepayment rates, and default rates. The constant prepayment and default rates are based on a 12 month historical average. Significant increases (decreases) in the discount rate in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Increases (decreases) in prepay rates in isolation result in a higher (lower) fair value and increases (decreases) in default rates in isolation result in a lower (higher) fair value.

~~The~~ HELOC loans, formerly included in the FSTAR 2005-1 and FSTAR 2006-1 securitization trusts, are valued utilizing a loan-level discounted cash flow model which projects expected cash flows given three potential outcomes: (1) paid-in-full at scheduled maturity, (2) default at scheduled maturity (foreclosure), and (3) modification at scheduled maturity into an amortizing HELOC. Loans are placed into the potential outcome buckets based on their underlying current delinquency, FICO scores and property CLTV all of which are unobservable inputs. Estimated cash flows are then discounted back using an unobservable discount rate. Loans within the loan portfolios contain FICO scores with a minimum of ~~447,~~437, maximum of ~~816,~~ 809,

and a weighted average of ~~665.~~650. For the loans, increases (decreases) in the discount rate, in isolation, would lower (higher) the fair value measurement.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the MSRs are option adjusted spreads, prepayment rates, and cost to service. Significant increases (decreases) in all three assumptions in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement. Additionally, the key economic assumptions used in determining the fair value of MSRs capitalized ~~during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 periods~~ were as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016		2015		2016		2015		2017		2016
Weighted average life (in years)	6.7		7.9		6.9		7.9		6.7		7.3
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	13.4	%	11.0	%	13.5	%	11.2	%	11.0	%	13.8	%
Weighted average option adjusted spread	11.8	%	8.9	%	9.5	%	8.7	%	9.7	%	7.3	%

The key economic assumptions reflected in the overall fair value of the entire portfolio of MSRs were as follows:


	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015		March 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Weighted average life (in years)	6.0		7.3		6.6		6.6
Weighted average constant prepayment rate	15.7	%	12.6	%	9.0	%	16.7	%
Weighted average option adjusted spread	9.2	%	8.2	%	6.5	%	7.8	%

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the DOJ litigation settlement is the discount ~~rate.~~rate and asset growth rate, in addition to those discussed in Note 16 - Legal Proceedings, Contingencies and Commitments. Significant increases (decreases) in the discount rate or asset growth rate in isolation could result in a marginally lower (higher) fair value measurement. For further information on the fair value inputs related to the DOJ litigation, see Note 16 ~~of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, herein.~~- Legal Proceedings, Contingencies, and Commitments.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the rate lock commitments is the pull through rate. The pull through rate is a statistical analysis of our actual rate lock fallout history to determine the sensitivity of the residential mortgage loan pipeline compared to interest rate changes and other deterministic values. New market prices are applied based on updated loan characteristics and new fallout ratios (i.e., the inverse of the pull through rate) are applied accordingly. Significant increases (decreases) in the pull through rate in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

We also have assets that under certain conditions are subject to measurement at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. These assets are measured at the lower of cost or market and had a fair value below cost at the end of the period as summarized below:

Total (1)
Level 2 Level 3
(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2016
Loans held-for-sale (2)
$ 10
$ 10
$ —
Impaired loans held-for-investment (3)

Residential first mortgage loans 22
—
22
Commercial and industrial loans 1
—
1
Repossessed assets (4)
15
—
15
Totals $ 48
$ 10
$ 38
December 31, 2015
Loans held-for-sale (2)
$ 8
$ 8
$ —
Impaired loans held-for-investment (3)

Residential first mortgage loans 40
—
40
Commercial real estate loans 2
—
2
Repossessed assets (4)
17
—
17
Totals
$ 67
$ 8
$ 59



	Total (1)		Level 2		Level 3		Gains/(Losses)
	(Dollars in millions)
March 31, 2017
Loans held-for-sale (2)	$	10	$	10	$	—	$	(2	)
Impaired loans held-for-investment (2)
Residential first mortgage loans	12		—		12		(3		)
Repossessed assets (3)	13		—		13		—
Totals	$	35	$	10	$	25	$	(5	)
December 31, 2016
Loans held-for-sale (2)	$	9	$	9	$	—	$	(2	)
Impaired loans held-for-investment (2)
Residential first mortgage loans	25		—		25		(28		)
Repossessed assets (3)	14		—		14		(2		)
Totals	$	48	$	9	$	39	$	(32	)


(1)	The fair values are ~~obtained~~determined at various dates during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2016~~March 31, 2017 and the year ended December 31, ~~2015,~~2016, respectively.

(2)

~~We recorded less than $1 million in~~Gains/(losses) reflect fair value ~~losses~~adjustments on ~~loans held-for-sale~~assets for which we did not elect the fair value option (included in interest income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations) during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to less than $1 million in fair value losses on loans held-for-sale during both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.option.


(3)	We recorded $11 million and $31 million in fair value losses on impaired loans (included in provision (benefit) for loan losses on Consolidated Statements of Operations) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to $20 million and $76 million in fair value losses on impaired loans during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.

~~(4)~~

~~We recorded zero and $2 million in losses related to~~Gains/(losses) reflect write downs of repossessed assets based on the estimated fair value of the specific assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, and recognized net gain of $1 million and $2 million on sales of repossessed assets (both write downs and net gains/losses are included in assets resolution expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations) during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016. We recorded $1 million and $2 million in losses related to write downs of repossessed assets based on the estimated fair value of the specific assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, and recognized a net gain of $1 million and $2 million on sales of repossessed assets during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively.assets.

The following tables present the quantitative information about nonrecurring level 3 fair value financial instruments and the fair value ~~measurements as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:~~measurements:

Fair Value Valuation Technique Unobservable Input Range (Weighted Average)
September 30, 2016 (Dollars in millions)
Impaired loans held-for-investment
Residential first mortgage loans $ 22
Fair value of collateral Loss severity discount 23% - 28% (25.6%)
Commercial and industrial loans $ 1
Fair value of collateral Loss severity discount 50% - 55% (53.4%)
Repossessed assets $ 15
Fair value of collateral Loss severity discount 35% - 98% (61.7%)

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input

Range (Weighted Average)

Fair Value

Valuation Technique

Unobservable Input

Range (Weighted Average)

December 31, 2015

(Dollars in millions)

March 31, 2017

Impaired loans held-for-investment

Residential first mortgage loans

Fair value of collateral

Loss severity discount

35% - 45% (35.2%)

Fair value of collateral

Loss severity discount

35% - 45% (38.6%)

Commercial real estate loans

Fair value of collateral

Loss severity discount

45% - 55% (50.1%)

Repossessed assets

Fair value of collateral

Loss severity discount

16% - 100% (48.7%)

Fair value of collateral

Loss severity discount

13% - 100% (72.4%)

December 31, 2016

Impaired loans held-for-investment

Residential first mortgage loans

Fair value of collateral

Loss severity discount

22% - 40% (29.5%)

Repossessed assets

Fair value of collateral

Loss severity discount

22% - 100% (69.5%)

Nonrecurring Significant Unobservable Inputs

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the impaired loans and repossessed assets are appraisals or other third-party price evaluations which incorporate measures such as recent sales prices for comparable properties.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following table presents the carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments that are carried either at fair value, cost, or amortized cost:


	September 30, 2016														March 31, 2017
				Estimated Fair Value														Estimated Fair Value
	Carrying Value			Total			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3			Carrying Value			Total			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3
	(Dollars in millions)														(Dollars in millions)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	174		$	174		$	174	$	—		$	—		$	161		$	161		$	161	$	—		$	—
Investment securities available-for-sale	1,115			1,115			—		1,115			—			1,650			1,650			—		1,650			—
Investment securities held-to-maturity	1,156			1,177			—		1,177			—			1,048			1,038			—		1,038			—
Reverse repurchase agreement															50			50					50
Loans held-for-sale	3,393			3,394			—		3,394			—			4,543			4,544			—		4,492			52
Loans held-for-investment															5,959			5,899			—		8			5,891
Loans with government guarantees	404			391			—		391			—			322			311			—		311			—
Loans held-for-investment, net	6,147			6,134			—		8			6,126
Mortgage servicing rights															295			295			—		—			295
Federal Home Loan Bank stock															201			201			—		201			—
Bank owned life insurance															273			273			—		273			—
Repossessed assets	15			15			—		—			15			13			13			—		—			13
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	172			172			—		172			—
Mortgage servicing rights	302			302			—		—			302
Bank owned life insurance	269			269			—		269			—
Other assets, foreclosure claims	152			152			—		152			—			119			119			—		119			—
Derivative financial instruments, assets	119			119			1		55			63			77			77			1		35			41
Liabilities
Retail deposits
Demand deposits and savings accounts	$	(5,204	)	$	(4,961	)	$	—	$	(4,961	)	$	—		$	(5,403	)	$	(5,065	)	$	—	$	(5,065	)	$	—
Certificates of deposit	(1,083		)	(1,095		)	—		(1,095		)	—			(1,084		)	(1,088		)	—		(1,088		)	—
Wholesale deposits															(10		)	(10		)	—		(10		)	—
Government deposits	(1,176		)	(1,158		)	—		(1,158		)	—			(1,003		)	(982		)	—		(982		)	—
Company controlled deposits	(1,908		)	(1,839		)	—		(1,839		)	—			(1,145		)	(1,073		)	—		(1,073		)	—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	(2,482		)	(2,450		)	—		(2,450		)	—			(4,386		)	(4,373		)	—		(4,373		)	—
Other long-term debt	(493		)	(257		)	—		(257		)	—
Warrant liabilities	(10		)	(10		)	—		(10		)	—
Long-term debt															(493		)	(376		)	—		(376		)	—
DOJ litigation settlement	(60		)	(60		)	—		—			(60		)	(60		)	(60		)	—		—			(60		)
Derivative financial instruments, liabilities	(93		)	(93		)	—		(93		)	—			(42		)	(42		)	—		(42		)	—


	December 31, 2015															December 31, 2016
				Estimated Fair Value															Estimated Fair Value
	Carrying Value			Total			Level 1			Level 2			Level 3			Carrying Value			Total			Level 1			Level 2			Level 3
	(Dollars in millions)															(Dollars in millions)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	208		$	208		$	208		$	—		$	—		$	158		$	158		$	158		$	—		$	—
Investment securities available-for-sale	1,294			1,294			—			1,294			—			1,480			1,480			—			1,480			—
Investment securities held-to-maturity	1,268			1,262			—			1,262			—			1,093			1,084			—			1,084			—
Loans held-for-sale	2,576			2,578			—			2,578			—			3,177			3,178			—			3,178			—
Loans held-for-investment																6,065			5,998			—			7			5,991
Loans with government guarantees	485			469			—			469			—			365			354			—			354			—
Loans held-for-investment, net	6,165			6,121			—			6			6,115
Mortgage servicing rights																335			335			—			—			335
Federal Home Loan Bank stock																180			180			—			180			—
Bank owned life insurance																271			271			—			271			—
Repossessed assets	17			17			—			—			17			14			14			—			—			14
Federal Home Loan Bank stock	170			170			—			170			—
Mortgage servicing rights	296			296			—			—			296
Bank owned life insurance	178			178			—			178			—
Other assets, foreclosure claims	210			210			—			210			—			135			135			—			135			—
Derivative financial instruments, assets	58			58			7			25			26			123			123			45			54			24
Liabilities
Retail deposits
Demand deposits and savings accounts	$	(5,008	)	$	(4,744	)	$	—		$	(4,744	)	$	—		$	(5,268	)	$	(4,956	)	$	—		$	(4,956	)	$	—
Certificates of deposit	(826		)	(833		)	—			(833		)	—			(1,056		)	(1,062		)	—			(1,062		)	—
Government deposits	(1,062		)	(1,045		)	—			(1,045		)	—			(1,030		)	(1,011		)	—			(1,011		)	—
Company controlled deposits	(1,039		)	(947		)	—			(947		)	—			(1,446		)	(1,371		)	—			(1,371		)	—
Federal Home Loan Bank advances	(3,541		)	(3,543		)	—			(3,543		)	—			(2,980		)	(2,964		)	—			(2,964		)	—
Long-term debt	(247		)	(89		)	—			(89		)	—			(493		)	(277		)	—			(277		)	—
Warrant liabilities	(8		)	(8		)	—			(8		)	—			(4		)	(4		)	—			(4		)	—
DOJ litigation settlement	(84		)	(84		)	—			—			(84		)	(60		)	(60		)	—			—			(60		)
Derivative financial instruments, liabilities	(18		)	(18		)	(1		)	(17		)	—			(54		)	(54		)	(11		)	(37		)	(6		)

The methods and assumptions used by us in estimating fair value of financial instruments which are required for disclosure only, are as follows:

Cash and cash equivalents. Due to their short-term nature, the carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents approximates fair value.

Investment securities held-to-maturity. Fair values are generated using market inputs, where possible, including quoted prices (the closing price in an exchange market), bid prices (the price at which a buyer stands ready to purchase), and other market information.

Loans held-for-investment. The fair value is estimated using internally developed discounted cash flow models using market interest rate inputs as well as management’s best estimate of spreads for similar collateral.

Loans with government guarantees. The fair value is estimated by using internally developed discounted cash flow models using market interest rate inputs as well as management’s best estimate of spreads for similar collateral.

~~Loans held-for-investment.~~ ~~The fair value is estimated using internally developed discounted cash flow models using market interest rate inputs as well as management’s best estimate of spreads for similar collateral.~~

Federal Home Loan Bank stock. No secondary market exists for ~~Federal Home Loan Bank~~FHLB stock. The stock is bought and sold at par by the ~~Federal Home Loan Bank.~~FHLB. Management believes that the recorded value equals the fair value.

Bank owned life insurance. The fair value of bank owned life insurance policies is based on the cash surrender values of the policies as reported by the insurance companies.

Other assets, foreclosure claims. The fair value of foreclosure claims with government guarantees approximates the carrying amount.

Deposit accounts. The fair value of deposits with no defined maturity is estimated based on a discounted cash flow model that incorporates current market rates for similar products and expected attrition. The fair value of fixed-maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the rates currently offered for certificates of deposit with similar remaining maturities.

Federal Home Loan Bank advances. Rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of the existing debt.

Long-term debt. The fair value of the long-term debt is estimated based on a discounted cash flow model that incorporates current borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Fair Value Option

We elected the fair value option for certain items as discussed throughout the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements to mitigate a divergence between accounting losses and economic exposure. Interest income on ~~loans held-for-sale~~LHFS is accrued on the principal outstanding primarily using the "simple-interest" method.

The following table reflects the change in fair value included in earnings of financial instruments for which the fair value option has been elected:


													Three Months Ended March 31,
		Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,						2017		2016
		2016		2015			2016			2015			(Dollars in millions)
Assets	Assets	(Dollars in millions)
Loans held-for-sale	Loans held-for-sale
	Net gain on loan sales	$	151	$	134		$	440		$	276
Net gain on loan sales													$	53	$	144
Loans held-for-investment	Loans held-for-investment
	Interest income on loans	$	—	$	1		$	(2	)	$	4
	Other noninterest income	—		(1		)	—			(35		)
Liabilities
Long-term debt
	Other noninterest income	$	—	$	3		$	—		$	28
Litigation settlement
	Other noninterest income	$	24	$	—		$	24		$	2
	Other noninterest (expense)	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	(2	)
Interest income on loans													$	1	$	—

The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate fair value and aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding ~~as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015~~ for assets and liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected:


		September 30, 2016										December 31, 2015									March 31, 2017									December 31, 2016
		(Dollars in millions)																			Unpaid Principal Balance			Fair Value			Fair Value Over / (Under) Unpaid Principal Balance			Unpaid Principal Balance			Fair Value			Fair Value Over / (Under) Unpaid Principal Balance
		Unpaid Principal Balance			Fair Value			Fair Value Over / (Under) Unpaid Principal Balance			Unpaid Principal Balance				Fair Value			Fair Value Over / (Under) Unpaid Principal Balance			(Dollars in millions)									(Dollars in millions)
Assets	Assets
	Nonaccrual loans
	Loans held-for-sale	$	2		$	2		$	—			$	1		$	—		$	(1	)
Nonaccrual loans
Loans held-for-sale																					$	16		$	8		$	(8	)	$	2		$	2		$	—
Loans held-for-investment	Loans held-for-investment	18			12			(6		)		21			10			(11		)	6			4			(2		)	19			13			(6		)
Total nonaccrual loans	Total nonaccrual loans	$	20		$	14		$	(6	)		$	22		$	10		$	(12	)	$	22		$	12		$	(10	)	$	21		$	15		$	(6	)
Other performing loans	Other performing loans
Loans held-for-sale	Loans held-for-sale	$	3,217		$	3,350		$	133			$	2,451		$	2,541		$	90		$	4,362		$	4,503		$	141		$	3,103		$	3,143		$	40
Loans held-for-investment	Loans held-for-investment	81			68			(13		)		112			101			(11		)	10			9			(1		)	72			59			(13		)
Total other performing loans	Total other performing loans	$	3,298		$	3,418		$	120			$	2,563		$	2,642		$	79		$	4,372		$	4,512		$	140		$	3,175		$	3,202		$	27
Total loans	Total loans
Loans held-for-sale	Loans held-for-sale	$	3,219		$	3,352		$	133			$	2,452		$	2,541		$	89		$	4,378		$	4,511		$	133		$	3,105		$	3,145		$	40
Loans held-for-investment	Loans held-for-investment	99			80			(19		)		133			111			(22		)	16			13			(3		)	91			72			(19		)
Total loans	Total loans	$	3,318		$	3,432		$	114			$	2,585		$	2,652		$	67		$	4,394		$	4,524		$	130		$	3,196		$	3,217		$	21
Liabilities	Liabilities
Litigation settlement (1)	Litigation settlement (1)	$	(118	)	$	(60	)	$	58			$	(118	)	$	(84	)	$	34		$	(118	)	$	(60	)	$	58		$	(118	)	$	(60	)	$	58


(1)	We are obligated to pay $118 million in installment payments upon meeting certain performance conditions.

Note 18 –- Segment Information

Our operations are conducted through ~~four~~three operating segments: Community Banking, Mortgage Originations, and

Mortgage ~~Servicing, Community Banking and~~Servicing. The Other ~~which~~segment includes the remaining reported activities. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise that engage in business activity from which revenues are earned and expenses incurred for which discrete financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by executive management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The operating segments have been determined based on the products and services offered and reflect the manner in which financial information is currently evaluated by management. Each segment operates under the same banking charter, but is reported on a segmented basis for this report. Each of the operating segments is complementary to each other and because of the interrelationships of the segments, the information presented is not indicative of how the segments would perform if they operated as independent entities.

Effective January 1, ~~2016,~~2017, activity related to Loans with Government Guarantees, was moved from the Mortgage Servicing segment to the Mortgage Originations segment and we ~~reorganized our reportable~~began to allocate the tax provision at a segment level. Prior to this change, the tax provision was reflected in the Other segment. The statutory federal tax rate is used for Community Banking, Mortgage Originations, and Mortgage Servicing segments ~~to align~~ with ~~our new management reporting structure~~the difference between the statutory rate and ~~to align with our long-term strategy.~~the effective tax rate held in the Other segment. Prior period segment financial information, related to both changes, has been recast to conform to the current presentation. ~~Prior~~

The Community Banking segment originates loans, provides deposits and fee based services to ~~the reorganization, representation~~consumer, business, and ~~warranty reserves were reported in the Mortgage Servicing segment~~mortgage lending customers through its Branch Banking, Business Banking and ~~the MSR asset~~Commercial Banking, Government Banking, Warehouse Lending and ~~associated costs were reported in the~~LHFI Portfolio groups. Products offered through these groups include checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit, consumer loans, commercial loans, commercial real estate loans, equipment finance and leasing, home builder finance loans and warehouse lines of credit. Other ~~segment. As a result of this change, representation~~financial services available include consumer and ~~warranty reserves,~~corporate card services, customized treasury management solutions, merchant services and capital markets services such as ~~well as the MSR asset and associated costs are now reported in the Mortgage Originations segment.~~loan syndications.

The Mortgage Originations segment originates, acquires and sells one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. The origination and acquisition of mortgage loans comprises the majority of the lending activity. Mortgage loans are originated through home loan centers, national call centers, the Internet and unaffiliated banks and mortgage banking and brokerage

companies, where the net interest income and the gains from sales associated with these loans are recognized in the Mortgage Originations segment.

The Mortgage Servicing segment services and ~~sub-services~~subservices mortgage loans, on a fee basis, for others. Also, the Mortgage Servicing segment services, on a fee basis, residential LHFI mortgages ~~held-for-investment~~held by the Community Banking segment and ~~mortgage servicing rights~~MSRs held by the Mortgage Originations segment. The Mortgage Servicing segment may also collect ancillary fees, such as late fees, and earns income through the use of noninterest-bearing escrows.

The Community Banking segment originates loans, provides deposits and fee based services to consumer, business, and mortgage lending customers through its Branch Banking, Business Banking and Commercial Banking, Government Banking, Warehouse Lending and Held-for-Investment Portfolio groups. Products offered through these teams include checking accounts, savings accounts, money market accounts, certificates of deposit, consumer loans, commercial loans, home builder finance loans and warehouse lines of credit. Other financial services available to consumer and commercial customers include lines of credit, revolving credit, customized treasury management solutions, equipment leasing, inventory, and accounts receivable lending and capital markets services such as interest rate risk protection products.

The Other segment includes the treasury functions, funding revenue associated with stockholders' equity, the impact of interest rate risk management, the impact of balance sheet funding activities, and miscellaneous other expenses of a corporate nature. Treasury functions include administering the investment securities portfolios, balance sheet funding, and interest rate risk management. In addition, the Other segment includes revenue and expenses related to treasury and corporate assets and liabilities and equity not directly assigned or allocated to the Mortgage Originations, Mortgage Servicing or Community Banking operating segments.

Revenues are comprised of net interest income (before the provision (benefit) for loan losses) and noninterest income. Noninterest expenses are fully allocated to each operating segment. Allocation methodologies may be subject to periodic adjustment as the internal management accounting system is revised and the business or product lines within the segments change.

The following tables present financial information by business segment for the periods indicated:


																Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2016															Community Banking			Mortgage Originations			Mortgage Servicing			Other			Total
	Mortgage Originations			Mortgage Servicing			Community Banking			Other			Total			(Dollars in millions)
Summary of Operations	(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income	$	21		$	10		$	54		$	(5	)	$	80		$	51		$	30		$	5		$	(3	)	$	83
Net gain on loan sales	95			—			(1		)	—			94
Net gain (loss) on loan sales																(2		)	50			—			—			48
Representation and warranty benefit	6			—			—			—			6			—			4			—			—			4
Other noninterest income	4			13			8			31			56			8			22			14			4			48
Total net interest income and noninterest income	126			23			61			26			236			57			106			19			1			183
(Provision) benefit for loan losses	—			—			(7		)	—			(7		)	(2		)	(2		)	—			1			(3		)
Asset resolution	—			(2		)	—			—			(2		)
Depreciation and amortization expense	(2		)	—			(1		)	(5		)	(8		)	(2		)	(2		)	(1		)	(4		)	(9		)
Other noninterest expense	(64		)	(25		)	(43		)	—			(132		)	(44		)	(62		)	(25		)	—			(131		)
Total noninterest expense	(66		)	(27		)	(44		)	(5		)	(142		)	(46		)	(64		)	(26		)	(4		)	(140		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	60			(4		)	10			21			87			9			40			(7		)	(2		)	40
Provision for income taxes	—			—			—			30			30
Provision (benefit) for income taxes																3			14			(2		)	(2		)	13
Net income (loss)	$	60		$	(4	)	$	10		$	(9	)	$	57		$	6		$	26		$	(5	)	$	—		$	27
Intersegment revenue	$	(1	)	$	5		$	—		$	(4	)	$	—		$	(1	)	$	—		$	5		$	(4	)	$	—

Average balances
Loans held-for-sale	$	3,400		$	—		$	16		$	—		$	3,416		$	20		$	3,266		$	—		$	—		$	3,286
Loans with government guarantees	—			432			—			—			432			—			342			—			—			342
Loans held-for-investment	5			—			5,843			—			5,848			5,605			5			—			29			5,639
Total assets	4,238			623			5,904			3,383			14,148			5,675			4,602			40			3,726			14,043
Deposits	—			1,853			7,273			—			9,126			7,455			—			1,340			—			8,795


																Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
	Three Months Ended September 30, 2015															Community Banking			Mortgage Originations			Mortgage Servicing			Other			Total
	Mortgage Originations			Mortgage Servicing			Community Banking			Other			Total			(Dollars in millions)
Summary of Operations	(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income	$	18		$	3		$	45		$	7		$	73		$	47		$	22		$	4		$	6		$	79
Net gain on loan sales	72			—			(4		)	—			68
Net gain (loss) on loan sales																6			69			—			—			$	75
Representation and warranty benefit	6			—			—			—			6			—			2			—			—			$	2
Other noninterest income	26			15			11			2			54			7			3			14			4			$	28
Total net interest income and noninterest income	122			18			52			9			201			60			96			18			10			184
(Provision) benefit for loan losses	—			—			1			—			1			13			—			—			—			13
Depreciation and amortization expense	(1		)	(1		)	(1		)	(3		)	(6		)	(2		)	(1		)	(1		)	(3		)	(7		)
Other noninterest expense	(56		)	(27		)	(39		)	(3		)	(125		)	(43		)	(60		)	(24		)	(3		)	(130		)
Total noninterest expense	(57		)	(28		)	(40		)	(6		)	(131		)	(45		)	(61		)	(25		)	(6		)	(137		)
Income (loss) before income taxes	65			(10		)	13			3			71			28			35			(7		)	4			60
Provision for income taxes	—			—			—			24			24
Provision (benefit) for income taxes																10			12			(2		)	1			21
Net income (loss)	$	65		$	(10	)	$	13		$	(21	)	$	47		$	18		$	23		$	(5	)	$	3		$	39
Intersegment revenue	$	3		$	5		$	(4	)	$	(4	)	$	—		$	(1	)	$	—		$	6		$	(5	)	$	—

Average balances
Loans held-for-sale	$	2,179		$	—		$	21		$	—		$	2,200		$	178		$	2,731		$	—		$	—		$	2,909
Loans with government guarantees	—			547			—			—			547			—			475			—			—			475
Loans held-for-investment	4			—			5,348			60			5,412			5,657			11			—			—			5,668
Total assets	2,709			860			5,336			3,400			12,305			5,837			4,033			42			3,631			13,543
Deposits	—			1,487			6,773			—			8,260			6,893			—			1,157			—			8,050

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
Mortgage Origination Mortgage Servicing Community Banking Other Total
Summary of Operations (Dollars in millions)
Net interest income $ 61
$ 23
$ 150
$ 2
$ 236
Net gain (loss) on loan sales 251
—
8
—
259
Representation and warranty benefit 12
—
—
—
12
Other noninterest income (loss) 17
39
21
41
118
Total net interest income and noninterest income 341
62
179
43
625
(Provision) benefit for loan losses —
—
9
—
9
Asset resolution —
(6 ) —
—
(6 )
Depreciation and amortization expense (4 ) (2 ) (5 ) (12 ) (23 )
Other noninterest expense (182 ) (70 ) (131 ) (6 ) (389 )
Total noninterest expense (186 ) (78 ) (136 ) (18 ) (418 )
Income (loss) before income taxes 155
(16 ) 52
25
216
Provision for income taxes —
—
—
73
73
Net income (loss) $ 155
$ (16 ) $ 52
$ (48 ) $ 143
Intersegment revenue $ 1
$ 16
$ (1 ) $ (16 ) $ —

Average balances
Loans held-for-sale $ 2,988
$ —
$ 83
$ —
$ 3,071
Loans with government guarantees —
450
—
—
450
Loans held-for-investment 6
—
5,689
—
5,695
Total assets 3,688
676
5,798
3,549
13,711
Deposits —
1,523
7,080
—
8,603

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015
Mortgage Origination Mortgage Servicing Community Banking Other Total
Summary of Operations (Dollars in millions)
Net interest income $ 52
$ 10
$ 126
$ 23
$ 211
Net gain (loss) on loan sales 255
—
(13 ) —
242
Representation and warranty benefit 13
—
—
—
13
Other noninterest income 60
42
19
(3 ) 118
Total net interest income and noninterest income 380
52
132
20
584
(Provision) benefit for loan losses —
—
18
—
18
Asset resolution —
(12 ) (1 ) —
(13 )
Depreciation and amortization expense (2 ) (2 ) (4 ) (9 ) (17 )
Other noninterest expense (174 ) (80 ) (116 ) (7 ) (377 )
Total noninterest expense (176 ) (94 ) (121 ) (16 ) (407 )
Income (loss) before income taxes 204
(42 ) 29
4
195
Provision for income taxes —
—
—
70
70
Net income (loss) $ 204
$ (42 ) $ 29
$ (66 ) $ 125
Intersegment revenue $ 9
$ 13
$ (13 ) $ (9 ) $ —

Average balances
Loans held-for-sale $ 2,052
$ —
$ 36
$ —
$ 2,088
Loans with government guarantees —
679
—
—
679
Loans held-for-investment 3
—
4,786
96
4,885
Total assets 2,555
1,004
4,753
3,351
11,663
Deposits —
1,189
6,602
—
7,791

Note 19 –- Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

~~Statement~~We adopted the following accounting standard updates (ASU) during the first quarter of ~~Cash Flows~~ - ~~In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement~~2017, none of ~~Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. This amendment addresses eight issues~~ which current GAAP does not include specific guidance or is unclear, pertaining to: Debt Prepayment or Debt Extinguishment Costs, Settlement of Zero-Coupon Debt Instruments, Contingent Consideration Payments Made after a Business Combination, Proceeds from the Settlement of Insurance Claims, Proceeds from the Settlement of Corporate-Owned or Bank-Owned Life Insurance Policies, Distributions Received from Equity Method Investees, Beneficial Interest in Securitization Transactions, and Separately Identifiable Cash Flows and Application of the Predominance Principle. ASU 2016-16 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating this guidance and does not expect this guidance to havehad a material impact onto our ~~Consolidated Financial Statements.~~financial statements:



Standard	Description	Effective Date
ASU 2016-17	Consolidation (Topic 810): Interests Held Through Related Parties That are Under Common Control	January 1, 2017
ASU 2016-09	Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting	January 1, 2017
ASU 2016-07	Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting	January 1, 2017
ASU 2016-06	Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments	January 1, 2017
ASU 2016-05	Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Effect of Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Relationships	January 1, 2017

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Adopted

The following ASUs have been issued and are expected to result in a significant change to our significant accounting policies and/or have a significant financial impact:

Credit Losses - In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326). The ASU alters the current method for recognizing credit losses within the reserve account. Currently, an institution uses the incurred loss method, the new guidance ~~will require the allowance~~requires financial assets to be ~~recorded~~presented at the net amount expected to be collected (i.e., net of expected credit losses). The measurement of expected credit losses should be based on ~~day one for~~relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the ~~contractual term~~collectability of the ~~financial asset.~~reported amount. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. ~~Management~~We have established an internal steering committee to lead the implementation efforts. The steering committee is in the process of evaluating control and process framework, data, model, and resource requirements and areas where modifications will be required. We are currently evaluating ~~this guidance and~~ the impact itadoption of the guidance will have on our Consolidated Financial ~~Statements.~~Statements, but highlight that any impact will be contingent upon the underlying characteristics of the affected portfolio and macroeconomic and internal forecasts at adoption date.

~~Stock Compensation~~ - In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. The amendments in ASU 2016-09 affect all entities that issue share-based payment awards to their employees. The areas for simplification in ASU 2016-09 involve several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating this guidance and does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~Derivatives and Hedging~~ - In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-06, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815) - Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments. The amendments in ASU 2016-06 clarify the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. An entity performing the assessment under the amendments in ASU 2016-06 is required to assess the embedded call (put) options solely in accordance with the four-step decision sequence. ASU 2016-06 is effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016 and early adoption is permitted. This guidance is not expected to have a material impact upon adoption on our Consolidated Financial Statements, but disclosures to the Notes thereto will be updated per the requirements.

Leases - In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842): Section A - Leases: Amendments to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, Section B - Conforming Amendments Related to Leases: Amendment to the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, Section C - Background Information and Basis For Conclusions. Lessees will need to recognize ~~almost~~substantially all leases on their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and a lease liability. For income statement purposes, the FASB retained a dual model, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or finance. Classification will be based on criteria that are largely similar to those applied in current lease accounting. ASU 2016-02 is effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2019~~2018 and early adoption is permitted. The guidance in ASU 2016-02 supersedes Topic 840, Leases. ~~Management is currently evaluating this guidance~~Upon adoption and ~~does~~implementation, we expect to gross up assets and liabilities due to the recognition of lease liabilities and right of use assets associated with the underlying lease contracts. While we do not expect ~~this~~the adoption of the guidance to have a material impact on our Consolidated ~~Financial Statements.~~

~~Financial Instruments~~ - ~~In January 2016,~~Statements of Operations given our current inventory of leases, review is ongoing and we will continue to evaluate the ~~FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement~~impact to the Consolidated Statements of Financial ~~Assets~~Condition and ~~Financial Liabilities. The new standard significantly revises an entity’s accounting related~~ to the classification and measurement of investments in equity securities and the presentation of certain fair value changes for financial liabilities measured at fair value. It also amends certain disclosure requirements associated with the fair value of financial instruments. ASU 2016-01 is effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is permitted. Management is currently evaluating this guidance and does not expect this guidance to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements, if any.capital.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers - In May 2014, ~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB")~~FASB issued ~~Accounting Standards Update ("ASU")~~ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)." Under the amended guidance, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration ~~to which the entity expects to be entitled~~ in exchange for those goods or services. The FASB has voted to approve a year deferral of the effective date from January 1, 2017 to January 1, ~~2018, while allowing for early adoption.~~2018. In April 2016, the FASB clarified the following two aspects: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12 Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients, to provide a limited number of changes to its revenue recognition standard. The amendments clarify the assessment of the likelihood that revenue will be collected from a contract, the guidance for presenting sales taxes and similar taxes, and the timing for measuring customer payments that are not in cash. The amendment also ~~says~~specifies that a contract should be considered complete if all, or substantially all, of its revenue has been collected prior to making the transition to the new standard. In addition, the update clarifies the disclosure requirements for ~~businesses and other organizations that make the~~ transition to the new standard by adjusting amounts from prior reporting periods. ~~The effects have~~In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20 Technical Corrections and Improvement to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. We expect to implement the revenue recognition guidance in the first quarter of 2018 utilizing the cumulative-effect approach. Our implementation of the guidance will include creation of an inventory of revenue contracts and assessing whether the recognition of revenue associated with each contract will be ~~disclosed for prior periods that were adjusted. Management is currently evaluating~~impacted by the new guidance, particularly related to certain fees. Lease contracts and financial instruments, which include loans and securities, are excluded from the scope of this ~~guidance and does~~standard. Therefore, we do not ~~expect this~~anticipate the implementation of the revenue recognition guidance to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial ~~Statements; however, changes to disclosures in the Notes thereto will be required.~~



~~ITEM 2.~~	~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~

Where we say "we," "us," or "our," we usually mean Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. However, in some cases, a reference to "we," "us," or "our" will include our wholly owned subsidiary Flagstar Bank, FSB (the "Bank").

~~FORWARD – LOOKING STATEMENTS~~

Certain statements in this Form 10-Q, including but not limited to statements included within the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, are "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, as amended. In addition, Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. also may make forward-looking statements in our other documents filed with or furnished to the SEC, and our management may make forward-looking statements orally to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others.

Generally, forward-looking statements are not based on historical facts but instead represent management’s beliefs regarding future events. Such statements may be identified by words such as believe, expect, anticipate, intend, plan, estimate, may increase, may fluctuate, and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as will, should, would and could. Such statements are based on management’s current expectations and are subject to risks, uncertainties and changes in circumstances. Actual results and capital and other financial conditions may differ materially from those included in these statements due to a variety of factors, including without limitation the precautionary statements included within each individual business’ discussion and analysis of our results of operations and the risk factors listed and described in Item 1A to Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and Item 1A to Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which are incorporated by reference herein, for further information on these and other factors affecting us.

~~General~~

We are a Michigan-based savings and loan holding company founded in 1993. Our business is primarily conducted through our principal subsidiary, the Bank, a federally chartered stock savings bank founded in 1987. At September 30, 2016, based on our assets, we are one of the largest banks headquartered in Michigan, providing commercial, small business, and consumer banking services. We have three major operating segments: Community Banking, Mortgage Originations, and Mortgage Servicing. Through these lines of business, we emphasize the delivery of a complete set of mortgage and banking products and services and are distinguished by local delivery, customer service and product pricing. Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") under the symbol "FBC." We are considered a controlled company for NYSE purposes, because MP Thrift Investments, L.P. ("MP Thrift") held approximately 62.9 percent of our common stock as of September 30, 2016.

Effective January 1, 2016, we reorganized our reportable segments to align with our new management reporting structure and to align with our long-term strategy. Prior period segment financial information has been recast to conform to 2016 presentation. Prior to the reorganization, representation and warranty reserves were reported in the Mortgage Servicing segment and the MSR asset and associated costs were reported in the Other segment. As a result of this change, representation and warranty reserves, as well as the MSR asset and associated costs are now reported in the Mortgage Originations segment.

Our Community Banking segment provides deposits and fee based services to consumer, business, and mortgage lending customers through our Branch Banking, Business Banking, Commercial Banking, Government Banking, Warehouse Lending and Held-for-Investment Portfolio groups. We maintain a portfolio of commercial and industrial, commercial real estate and builder finance loans with our commercial customers and we originate or purchase residential mortgage loans through referrals from our branches, consumer direct call center and our website, flagstar.com. At September 30, 2016, we operated 99 branches in Michigan. We leverage the customer relationships we have gained throughout our branch network to cross-sell products to existing customers and increase our customer base. In 2016, we also began to offer new MSR lending and equipment finance lease products.

Through our Mortgage Origination segment, we originate or purchase residential mortgage loans throughout the country and sell them into securitization pools, primarily to Federal National Mortgage Association ("Fannie Mae"), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation ("Freddie Mac") and the Government National Mortgage Association ("Ginnie Mae") (collectively, the "Agencies") or as whole loans. In addition, we originate or purchase residential first mortgage loans and other consumer loans, and commercial loans to our held-for-investment loan portfolios. Our revenues include net interest income, income from banking services we provide to customers, and noninterest income from sales of residential first mortgage loans to the Agencies, and the servicing of loans for others. The combination of our retail, broker and correspondent channels gives us broad access to customers across diverse geographies to originate, fulfill, sell and service our residential mortgage loan products.

The majority of our total loan originations during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 represented mortgage loans that were collateralized by residential first mortgages on single-family residences and were eligible for sale to the Agencies. At September 30, 2016, we originated or purchased residential mortgage loans in all 50 states, the U.S. Virgin Islands, and the District of Columbia through relationships with 556 mortgage brokers and 729 correspondents. At September 30, 2016, we also operated 31 retail locations located in 21 states, which primarily originate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans as part of our Mortgage Originations segment. In addition, we originate other consumer and commercial loans through our Community Banking segment. We continue to expand existing business lines, such as our distributed retail and direct-to-consumer mortgage origination businesses.

Our Mortgage Servicing segment services and subservices mortgage loans for others on a fee for service basis and may also collect ancillary fees, such as late fees and earn income through the use of noninterest bearing escrows. Revenue on our subserviced loans is earned on a contractual fee basis, with the fees varying based on the status of the underlying loans.

~~At September 30, 2016, we had 2,881 full-time equivalent employees inclusive of account executives and loan officers.~~

~~Critical Accounting Policies~~

accounting for income taxes; and (d) the determination of our representation and warranty reserve. We believe the judgment, estimates and assumptions used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes, in Item 1, are appropriate given the factual circumstances at the time. However, given the sensitivity of our Consolidated Financial Statements and the Notes, in Item 1, herein, to these critical accounting policies, the use of other judgments, estimates and assumptions could result in material differences in our results of operations and/or financial condition. For further information on our critical accounting policies, please refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, which is available on our website, flagstar.com, under the Investor Relations section, or on the website of the Securities and Exchange Commission, at sec.gov.

~~Selected Financial Ratios~~

~~(Dollars in millions, except share data)~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Mortgage loans originated (1)
$ 9,198
$ 7,876
$ 23,880
$ 23,578
Mortgage loans sold and securitized $ 8,723
$ 7,318
$ 23,611
$ 21,143
Interest rate spread 2.36 % 2.56 % 2.43 % 2.59 %
Net interest margin 2.58 % 2.75 % 2.62 % 2.76 %
Average common shares outstanding 56,580,238
56,436,026
56,556,188
56,419,354
Average fully diluted shares outstanding 57,933,806
57,207,503
57,727,262
57,050,789
Average interest earning assets $ 12,318
$ 10,693
$ 11,944
$ 10,165
Average interest paying liabilities $ 9,773
$ 8,354
$ 9,600
$ 8,044
Average stockholders' equity $ 1,379
$ 1,510
$ 1,515
$ 1,466
Return on average assets 1.61 % 1.52 % 1.40 % 1.43 %
Return on average equity 16.53 % 12.41 % 12.59 % 11.36 %
Return on average common equity 17.45 % 15.08 % 14.52 % 13.88 %
Efficiency ratio 59.9 % 65.0 % 66.9 % 69.6 %
Equity-to-assets ratio (average for the period) 9.75 % 12.27 % 11.05 % 12.56 %
Charge-offs to average LHFI (2)
0.51 % 1.84 % 0.66 % 2.34 %
Charge-offs to average LHFI, adjusted (2)(3)
0.15 % 0.61 % 0.15 % 0.43 %

September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015
Book value per common share $ 22.72
$ 22.33
$ 21.91
Number of common shares outstanding 56,597,271
56,483,258
56,436,026
Mortgage loans serviced for others $ 31,372
$ 26,145
$ 26,306
Mortgage loans subserviced for others $ 38,801
$ 40,244
$ 42,282
Weighted average service fee (basis points) 28.1
27.7
28.3
Capitalized value of mortgage servicing rights 0.96 % 1.13 % 1.12 %
Mortgage servicing rights to Tier 1 capital 24.60 % 20.63 % 21.10 %
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to LHFI (2)
2.30 % 3.00 % 3.66 %
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to LHFI and loans with government guarantees (2)
2.16 % 2.78 % 3.34 %
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets 0.39 % 0.61 % 0.64 %
Equity-to-assets ratio 9.01 % 11.14 % 12.01 %
Common equity-to-assets ratio 9.01 % 9.20 % 9.88 %
Tier 1 leverage ratio (to adjusted total assets) 8.88 % 11.51 % 11.65 %
Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio (to risk-weighted assets) 12.04 % 14.09 % 14.93 %
Total risk-based capital ratio (to risk-weighted assets) 15.26 % 20.28 % 21.64 %
Number of bank branches 99
99
99
Number of FTE employees 2,881
2,713
2,677


~~(1)~~	~~Includes residential first mortgage and second mortgage loans.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Excludes loans carried under the fair value option.~~

~~(3)~~

Excludes charge-offs of zero and $16 million related to the sale of loans during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively, and $8 million and $67 million related to the transfer and subsequent sale of loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively. Also excludes charge-offs related to loans with government guarantees of $6 million and $13 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

~~Summary of Operations~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Net interest income $ 80
$ 73
$ 236
$ 211
Provision (benefit) for loan losses 7
(1 ) (9 ) (18 )
Total noninterest income 156
128
389
373
Total noninterest expense 142
131
418
407
Provision for income taxes 30
24
73
70
Net income $ 57
$ 47
$ 143
$ 125
Income per share:
Basic $ 0.98
$ 0.70
$ 2.21
$ 1.82
Diluted $ 0.96
$ 0.69
$ 2.16
$ 1.80

Our net income increased $10 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to a $28 million improvement in noninterest income, driven by higher net gain on loan sales, while a decrease in fair value of the DOJ settlement liability was offset by higher loss on mortgage servicing rights. The noninterest income improvement was primarily offset by higher performance driven expenses and provision for income taxes.

Net income increased $18 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase was primarily driven by a $25 million increase in net interest income and $16 million increase in noninterest income partially offset by higher performance driven expenses and a lower benefit for loan losses. Net interest income increased as a result of asset growth and our strategic initiative to replace lower credit quality assets with higher quality residential and commercial loans. As a result of this initiative, we grew average interest earning assets by 19 percent from $10.2 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to $11.9 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Within noninterest income, net gain on loan sales increased $17 million while a decrease in fair value of the DOJ settlement liability was offset by a higher loss on mortgage servicing rights driven by low interest rates which result in higher prepayments and a more competitive market.

~~Net Interest Income~~

~~The following tables present on a consolidated basis interest income from average assets and liabilities, expressed in dollars and yields:~~

Three Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015

Average
Balance
Interest
Annualized
Yield/
Rate

Average
Balance
Interest
Annualized
Yield/
Rate
(Dollars in millions)
Interest-Earning Assets
Loans held-for-sale $ 3,416
$ 30
3.51 % $ 2,200
$ 22
3.94 %
Loans held-for-investment
Consumer loans (1)
2,580
23
3.52 % 3,367
30
3.67 %
Commercial loans (1)
3,268
33
3.96 % 2,045
20
3.80 %
Loans held-for-investment 5,848
56
3.77 % 5,412
50
3.72 %
Loans with government guarantees 432
4
3.88 % 547
5
3.37 %
Investment securities 2,516
16
2.55 % 2,313
14
2.50 %
Interest-earning deposits 106
—
0.48 % 221
—
0.53 %
Total interest-earning assets 12,318
106
3.42 % 10,693
91
3.42 %
Other assets 1,830
1,612

Total assets $ 14,148
$ 12,305

Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Retail deposits
Demand deposits $ 509
$ —
0.20 % $ 429
$ —
0.14 %
Savings deposits
3,751
8
0.77 % 3,732
8
0.84 %
Money market deposits 250
—
0.41 % 262
—
0.33 %
Certificates of deposit 1,071
3
1.05 % 785
2
0.80 %
Total retail deposits 5,581
11
0.75 % 5,208
10
0.75 %
Government deposits
Demand deposits 243
—
0.39 % 286
—
0.39 %
Savings deposits 478
1
0.52 % 445
1
0.52 %
Certificates of deposit 355
—
0.52 % 335
—
0.40 %
Total government deposits 1,076
1
0.49 % 1,066
1
0.45 %
Total deposits 6,657
12
0.71 % 6,274
11
0.70 %
Short-term debt 1,073
1
0.44 % 12
—
4.50 %
Long-term debt 1,576
7
1.81 % 1,786
5
1.17 %
Other debt 467
6
4.86 % 282
2
2.53 %
Total interest-bearing liabilities 9,773
26
1.06 % 8,354
18
0.86 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits (2) 2,469
1,986

Other liabilities 527
455

Stockholders’ equity 1,379
1,510

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 14,148
$ 12,305

Net interest-earning assets $ 2,545
$ 2,339

Net interest income $ 80
$ 73

Interest rate spread (3)
2.36 % 2.56 %
Net interest margin (4)
2.58 % 2.75 %
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities 126.0 % 128.0 %


~~(1)~~	Consumer loans include: residential first mortgage, second mortgage, HELOC, and other consumer loans. Commercial loans include: commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and warehouse lending loans.


~~(2)~~	~~Includes company controlled deposits that arise due to the servicing of loans for others.~~


~~(3)~~	~~Interest rate spread is the difference between rates of interest earned on interest-earning assets and rates of interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities.~~


~~(4)~~	~~Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.~~

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015

Average
Balance
Interest
Annualized
Yield/
Rate

Average
Balance
Interest
Annualized
Yield/
Rate
(Dollars in millions)
Interest-Earning Assets
Loans held-for-sale $ 3,071
$ 83
3.64 % $ 2,088
$ 61
3.91 %
Loans held-for-investment

Consumer loans (1)
2,879
76
3.51 % 2,968
83
3.75 %
Commercial loans (1)
2,816
84
3.94 % 1,917
57
3.92 %
Loans held-for-investment 5,695
160
3.72 % 4,885
140
3.82 %
Loans with government guarantees 450
12
3.40 % 679
15
2.86 %
Investment securities 2,589
50
2.58 % 2,260
43
2.54 %
Interest-earning deposits 139
1
0.50 % 253
1
0.50 %
Total interest-earning assets 11,944
306
3.40 % 10,165
260
3.41 %
Other assets 1,767
1,498

Total assets $ 13,711
$ 11,663

Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Retail deposits
Demand deposits $ 479
$ 1
0.17 % $ 428
$ —
0.14 %
Savings deposits
3,720
21
0.78 % 3,683
22
0.81 %
Money market deposits 285
1
0.44 % 253
1
0.28 %
Certificates of deposit 789
7
1.21 % 778
4
0.73 %
Total retail deposits 5,273
30
0.77 % 5,142
27
0.72 %
Government deposits
Demand deposits 234
1
0.39 % 241
1
0.39 %
Savings deposits 432
2
0.52 % 406
1
0.52 %
Certificates of deposit 563
1
0.35 % 341
1
0.36 %
Total government deposits 1,229
4
0.42 % 988
3
0.44 %
Total deposits 6,502
34
0.70 % 6,130
30
0.67 %
Short-term debt 1,190
4
0.41 % 15
—
1.28 %
Long-term debt 1,587
22
1.88 % 1,595
13
1.05 %
Other debt 321
10
4.05 % 304
6
2.44 %
Total interest-bearing liabilities 9,600
70
0.97 % 8,044
49
0.81 %
Noninterest-bearing deposits (2) 2,101
1,661

Other liabilities 495
492

Stockholders’ equity 1,515
1,466

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity $ 13,711
$ 11,663

Net interest-earning assets $ 2,344
$ 2,121

Net interest income $ 236
$ 211

Interest rate spread (3)
2.43 % 2.59 %
Net interest margin (4)
2.62 % 2.76 %
Ratio of average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities 124.4 % 126.4 %


~~(1)~~	Consumer loans include: residential first mortgage, second mortgage, HELOC, and other consumer loans. Commercial loans include: commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and warehouse lending loans.


~~(2)~~	~~Includes company controlled deposits that arise due to the servicing of loans for others.~~


~~(3)~~	~~Interest rate spread is the difference between rates of interest earned on interest-earning assets and rates of interest paid on interest-bearing liabilities.~~


~~(4)~~	~~Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.~~

~~Comparison to Prior Year Quarter~~

Net interest income increased $7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily due to growth in interest earning assets, partially offset by a decrease in net interest margin driven by a lower interest rate environment.

Our net interest margin for the three months ended September 30, 2016 was 2.58 percent, compared to 2.75 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease from 2015 was driven primarily by higher interest rates on fixed rate long term debt used to match-fund our longer duration asset growth and increased interest expense on senior debt issued in conjunction with the TARP redemption.

Interest income increased $15 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily driven by higher average loans held-for-sale and loans held-for-investment partially offset by lower interest rates on loans held-for-sale. Average loans held-for-sale increased $1.2 billion or 55.3 percent compared to the same period in 2015, primarily due to slower deliveries of saleable mortgage loans to the Agencies during the three months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015. Average loans held-for-investment for the three months ended September 30, 2016, increased $0.4 billion or 8.1 percent, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2015. This was primarily due to a continued shift in mix, consistent with our strategy, of $1.3 billion in average balance of high quality, higher yielding commercial loans and corresponding decrease of $0.8 billion in average balance of primarily lower yielding residential first mortgage loans.

Interest expense increased $8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily driven by higher interest rates from longer term fixed rate debt taken to match-fund our longer duration asset growth and interest expense as a result of the senior debt issued in conjunction with the TARP redemption. Also impacting the increase was a $383 million increase in interest-bearing deposits driven by growth in deposits which has been used to fund our loan growth.

~~Comparison to Prior Year to Date~~

Net interest income increased $25 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily driven by continued growth in interest earning assets partially offset by a decrease in the net interest margin driven by a lower interest rate environment and issuance of senior debt used for TARP redemption.

Our net interest margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 2.62 percent, compared to 2.76 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 was driven by higher interest rates from longer term fixed rate debt taken to match-fund our longer duration asset growth, interest expense on senior debt issued for TARP redemption and lower interest rate environment experience in 2016, partially offset from a rotation of lower spread residential mortgage loans into higher spread commercial loans.

Interest income increased $46 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily driven by higher average loans held-for-sale and loans held-for-investment partially offset by lower interest rates. Average loans held-for-sale increased $1.0 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily due to an increase in average volume, partially offset by a decrease in average yield resulting from a more competitive pricing market. Average loans held-for-investment increased $0.8 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily due to growth in warehouse, commercial and HELOC loans, partially offset by a decrease in average yield from more competitive pricing in the residential and consumer markets.

Interest expense increased $21 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015, primarily driven by an increase in the average balance and higher rates on debt to match-fund our longer duration asset growth. Also impacting the increase was a $4 million increase due to $372 million higher average interest-bearing deposits for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015 and a $4 million increase in interest expense as a result of the senior debt issued in conjunction with the TARP redemption.

~~Rate/Volume Analysis~~

The following tables present the dollar amount of changes in interest income and interest expense for the components of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that are presented in the preceding table. The table below distinguishes between the changes related to average outstanding balances (changes in volume while holding the initial rate constant) and the changes related to average interest rates (changes in average rates while holding the initial balance constant). The rate/volume variances are allocated to variances due to rate.

Three Months Ended September 30,

2016 Versus 2015 Increase (Decrease)
Due to:
Rate Volume Total
(Dollars in millions)
Interest-Earning Assets
Loans held-for-sale $ (4 ) $ 12
$ 8
Loans held-for-investment
Consumer loans (1)
(1 ) (6 ) (7 )
Commercial loans (2)
2
11
13
Total loans held-for-investment 1
5
6
Loans with government guarantees —
(1 ) (1 )
Investment securities (4 ) 6
2
Total other interest-earning assets $ (7 ) $ 22
$ 15
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Retail deposits
Certificates of deposit $ —
$ 1
$ 1
Total deposits —
1
1
Short-term debt (15 ) 16
1
Long-term debt 3
(1 ) 2
Other debt 3
1
4
Total interest-bearing liabilities $ (9 ) $ 17
$ 8
Change in net interest income $ 2
$ 5
$ 7


~~(1)~~	~~Consumer loans include residential first mortgage, second mortgage, HELOC, and other consumer loans.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Commercial loans include commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and warehouse lending.~~

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2016 Versus 2015 Increase (Decrease)
Due to:
Rate Volume Total
(Dollars in millions)
Interest-Earning Assets
Loans held-for-sale $ (7 ) $ 29
$ 22
Loans held-for-investment
Consumer loans (1)
(5 ) (2 ) (7 )
Commercial loans (2)
1
26
27
Total loans held-for-investment (4 ) 24
20
Loans with government guarantees 2
(5 ) (3 )
Investment securities (88 ) 95
7
Total other interest-earning assets $ (97 ) $ 143
$ 46
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Retail deposits
Demand deposits $ —
$ 1
$ 1
Savings deposits (1 ) —
(1 )
Certificates of deposit 2
1
3
Total retail deposits 1
2
3
Government deposits
Savings deposits —
1
1
Total government deposits —
1
1
Total deposits 1
3
4
Short-term debt (49 ) 53
4
Long-term debt 9
—
9
Other debt 4
—
4
Total interest-bearing liabilities $ (35 ) $ 56
$ 21
Change in net interest income $ (62 ) $ 87
$ 25


~~(1)~~	~~Consumer loans include residential first mortgage, second mortgage, HELOC, and other consumer loans.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Commercial loans include commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and warehouse lending.~~

~~Provision (Benefit) for Loan Losses~~

~~Comparison to Prior Year Quarter~~

The provision (benefit) for loan losses was a provision of $7 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to a benefit of $1 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015. During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the $7 million provision was largely to reserve for repossessed loans with government guarantees. During the three months ended September 30, 2015, the benefit for loan losses included charge-offs of $24 million and net originations of $5 million offset by a release of reserves of $30 million related to loan sales.

Net charge-offs for the three months ended September 30, 2016 decreased to $7 million, compared to $24 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. For the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, net charge-offs included $6 million and zero of net charge-offs associated with loans with government guarantees, respectively. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, net charge-offs included $16 million associated with the sale or transfer of $233 million unpaid principal balance of interest-only and non-agency loans. As a percentage of the average loans held-for-investment, net charge-offs for the three months ended September 30, 2016 decreased to 0.51 percent from 1.84 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2015. Excluding the charge-offs associated with loan sales or transfers and loans with government guarantees, net charge-offs as a percentage of the average loans held-for-investment were 0.15 percent during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to 0.61 percent during the three months ended September 30, 2015.

~~Comparison to Prior Year to Date~~

The provision (benefit) for loan losses was a benefit of $9 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to an $18 million benefit during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The $9 million benefit resulted primarily from the sale of $1.2 billion unpaid principal balance of performing residential first mortgage loans and $110 million of unpaid principal balance of nonperforming, TDR and non-agency loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the provision (benefit) for loan losses included a net reduction in the allowance for loan losses relating to several loan sales, including a net reduction in the allowance relating to interest-only residential first mortgage loans, partially offset by an increase related to the growth in average loans held-for-investment loan portfolio.

Net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased to $28 million, compared to $82 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, net charge-offs included $8 million associated with the sale of $110 million unpaid principal balance of nonperforming, TDR and non-agency loans and $13 million of net charge-offs associated with loans with government guarantees. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net charge-offs included $67 million associated with the sale or transfer of interest-only residential first mortgage loans with unpaid principal balances totaling $600 million, along with $420 million of nonperforming, TDR and non-agency first mortgage loans. As a percentage of the average loans held-for-investment, net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 decreased to 0.66 percent from 2.34 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. Excluding the charge-offs associated with loan sales or transfers and loans with government guarantees, net charge-offs as a percentage of the average loans held-for-investment were 0.15 percent during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to 0.43 percent during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

~~See the section captioned "Allowance for Loan Losses" in this discussion for further analysis of the provision (benefit) for loan losses.~~

~~Noninterest Income~~

~~The following table sets forth the components of our noninterest income:~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Net gain on loan sales $ 94
$ 68
$ 259
$ 242
Loan fees and charges 22
17
56
53
Deposit fees and charges 5
7
17
19
Loan administration income 4
8
14
19
Net (loss) return on mortgage servicing rights (11 ) 12
(21 ) 19
Net (loss) gain on sale of assets —
1
(2 ) (1 )
Representation and warranty benefit 6
6
12
13
Other noninterest income 36
9
54
9
Total noninterest income $ 156
$ 128
$ 389
$ 373

~~The following loans held-for-sale table provides information on our net gain on loan sales reported in our consolidated financial statements and loans sold within the period:~~

Three Months Ended
September 30,
2016 June 30,
2016 March 31,
2016 December 31,
2015 September 30,
2015
(Dollars in millions)
Mortgage rate lock commitments (fallout-adjusted) (1)
$ 8,291
$ 8,127
$ 6,863
$ 5,027
$ 6,495
Net margin on mortgage rate lock commitments (fallout-adjusted) (1) (2)
1.13 % 1.04 % 0.96 % 0.92 % 1.05 %
Net gain on loan sales on HFS $ 94
$ 85
$ 66
$ 46
$ 68
Net (loss) return on the mortgage servicing rights $ (11 ) $ (4 ) $ (6 ) $ 9
$ 12
Gain on loan sales HFS + net (loss) return on the MSR $ 83
$ 81
$ 60
$ 55
$ 80
Residential loans serviced (number of accounts - 000's) (3)
366
358
340
361
369
Capitalized value of mortgage servicing rights 0.96 % 0.99 % 1.06 % 1.13 % 1.12 %
Mortgage loans sold and securitized 8,723 7,940 6,948 5,164 7,318
Net margin on loan sales 1.08 % 1.07 % 0.94 % 0.90 % 0.93 %


~~(1)~~	Fallout adjusted refers to mortgage rate lock commitments which are adjusted by a percentage of mortgage loans in the pipeline that are not expected to close based on our historical experience and the level of interest rates.


~~(2)~~	~~Gain on sale margin is based on net gain on loan sales related to held-for-sale loans to fallout-adjusted mortgage rate lock commitments.~~


~~(3)~~	~~Includes serviced for own loan portfolio, serviced for others and subserviced for others loans.~~

~~Comparison to Prior Year Quarter~~

~~Total noninterest income was $156 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016, which was a $28 million increase from $128 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015.~~

Net gain on loan sales increased $26 million to $94 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $68 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to higher fallout-adjusted locks which increased to $8.3 billion during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $6.5 billion in the three months ended September 30, 2015 driven by a low interest rate environment in the third quarter of 2016. The fallout-adjusted net margin on mortgage rate lock commitments, excluding loans held-for-investment, increased 8 basis points to 1.13 percent during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to 1.05 percent for the three months ended September 30, 2015.

For the three months ended September 30, 2016, loan fees and charges increased $5 million to $22 million, as compared to $17 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase in loan fees and charges during the three months ended September 30, 2016, primarily reflects higher mortgage loan closings.

For the three months ended September 30, 2016, loan administration income decreased $4 million to $4 million, as compared to $8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in fees charged on loans serviced for others.

Net loss on mortgage servicing rights was $11 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to a return of $12 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015. The $23 million decrease was primarily due to higher prepayments and higher prepayment assumptions resulting in changes in fair value related to sales including a $7 million change associated with pending MSR sales with a fair value of $50 million expected to close in the fourth quarter 2016.

Other noninterest income increased $27 million to $36 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase was almost entirely due to a $24 million reduction in the fair value of the Company's DOJ settlement liability. The reduction of the DOJ liability was a result of a change in the expectation as to the timing of payments.

~~Comparison to Prior Year to Date~~

~~Total noninterest income was $389 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, which was a $16 million increase from $373 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.~~

Net gain on loan sales increased $17 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, as compared to the same period in 2015. The increase was primarily due to higher fallout-adjusted lock volume and a $14 million gain resulting from the sale of performing loans held-for-investment, partially offset by lower margin. The fallout-adjusted net margin on mortgage rate lock commitments, excluding loans held-for-investment decreased 13 basis points to 1.05 percent during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to 1.18 percent for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

Loan fees and charges increased $3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $56 million, as compared to $53 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase is primarily due to higher mortgage loan closings.

Loan administration income decreased $5 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 to $14 million, as compared to $19 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in fee revenue from loans subserviced for others.

Net loss on mortgage servicing rights was $21 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to a return of $19 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The $40 million decrease was primarily due to higher prepayments and a decrease in fair value driven by pending MSR sales.

Other noninterest income increased $45 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to the benefit related to the decrease in the fair value of the DOJ settlement liability, gain on sale of available-for-sale investment securities and income earned on our bank owned life insurance whose average balances increased along with lower adjustments related to assets and liabilities held at fair value.

~~Noninterest Expense~~

~~The following table sets forth the components of our noninterest expense:~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Compensation and benefits $ 69
$ 58
$ 203
$ 178
Commissions 16
10
40
31
Occupancy and equipment 21
20
64
60
Asset resolution 2
—
6
13
Federal insurance premiums 3
6
9
18
Loan processing expense 13
14
40
40
Legal and professional expense 5
10
20
27
Other noninterest expense 13
13
36
40
Total noninterest expense $ 142
$ 131
$ 418
$ 407
Efficiency ratio 59.9 % 65.0 % 66.9 % 69.6 %

~~Comparison to Prior Year Quarter~~

Noninterest expense increased $11 million to $142 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $131 million during the three months ended September 30, 2015. The increase was primarily driven by investment in new strategic initiatives, higher stock compensation expense and increased business activity, primarily offset by a decrease in legal and professional expense.

~~Comparison to Prior Year to Date~~

Noninterest expense was $418 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and $407 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The increase was primarily due to a $25 million increase in compensation and benefits, and $9 million in commissions driven by investment in new strategic initiatives, higher stock compensation expense and increased business activity. This increase was partially offset by a $9 million decrease in federal insurance premiums due to an improvement in our risk profile along with a $7 million decrease in asset resolution expense primarily due to a decrease in default servicing and foreclosure costs and a $7 million decrease in legal and professional expense.

Other noninterest expense decreased $4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015, primarily driven by lower litigation settlement expenses. Additionally, in the second quarter 2016, we had a litigation settlement expense of $6 million related to the settlement of a class action lawsuit during the period which was offset by a favorable settlement with a vendor for which we were the plaintiff.

~~Provision for Income Taxes~~

Our provision for income taxes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was $30 million and $73 million, respectively, compared to a provision of $24 million and $70 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. Our effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 was 34.3 percent and 33.8 percent, respectively, compared to 34.4 percent and 36.0 percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. The effective rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 differs from the combined federal and state statutory tax rate primarily due to benefits associated with state tax settlements and non-taxable bank owned life insurance earnings, partially offset by an increase in warrant expense and other nondeductible expenses.

~~For further information relating to income taxes, see Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, herein.~~

~~OPERATING SEGMENTS~~

~~Overview~~

For detail on each segment's objectives, strategies, and priorities, please read this section in conjunction with Note 18 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, herein, for a full understanding of our consolidated financial performance.

Effective January 1, 2016, we reorganized our reportable segments to align with our new management reporting structure and to align with our long-term strategy. All prior periods were reclassified to be consistent with the current presentation. Prior to the reorganization, representation and warranty reserves were reported in the Mortgage Servicing segment and the MSR asset and associated costs were reported in the Other segment. As a result of this change, representation and warranty reserves, as well as the MSR asset and associated costs are now reported in the Mortgage Originations segment.

~~The net income (loss) by operating segment is presented in the following table:~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Mortgage Originations $ 60
$ 65
$ 155
$ 204
Mortgage Servicing (4 ) (10 ) (16 ) (42 )
Community Banking 10
13
52
29
Other (9 ) (21 ) (48 ) (66 )
Total net income $ 57
$ 47
$ 143
$ 125

~~Mortgage Originations~~

~~Comparison to Prior Year Quarter~~

The Mortgage Originations segment net income decreased $5 million to $60 million during the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to $65 million in the three months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily due to a $23 million lower net return on MSRs resulting from increased runoff related to lower interest rates, primarily offset by a $24 million increase in net gain on loan sales resulting from a $1.5 billion increase in fallout-adjusted locks and a higher margin.

~~Comparison to Prior Year to Date~~

The Mortgage Originations segment reported net income of $155 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to net income of $204 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The decrease was primarily driven by $40 million lower net return on MSRs resulting from increased runoff related to lower interest rates and increased expectations for prepayments, as well as $7 million higher commissions related to higher mortgage originations.

~~Mortgage Servicing~~

~~Comparison to Prior Year Quarter~~

The Mortgage Servicing segment reported a net loss of $4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $10 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The $6 million improvement was primarily due to a $6 million increase in interest income on company controlled deposits as a result of higher average balances and a decrease in loan processing expense.

~~Comparison to Prior Year to Date~~

The Mortgage Servicing segment reported a net loss of $16 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to a net loss of $42 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The $26 million improvement was primarily due to $13 million increase in interest income on company controlled deposits resulting from higher average balances, a $6 million decrease in asset resolution expense and a decrease in loan processing expense.

~~Community Banking~~

~~Comparison to Prior Year Quarter~~

During the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Community Banking segment reported net income of $10 million, compared to $13 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The $3 million decrease in net income was primarily due to an increase of $10 million in net interest income due to growth in warehouse, commercial, and home builder finance loan balances, partially offset by a higher provision expense on higher loan balances and charge-offs.

~~Comparison to Prior Year to Date~~

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Community Banking segment reported net income of $52 million, compared to $29 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The $23 million increase in net income was primarily due to a $24 million increase in net interest income resulting from growth in our warehouse, commercial, and home builder finance loan balances. In addition, we had a net gain on loan sales of $21 million which was primarily driven by the sale of performing residential first mortgage loans out of the held-for-investment portfolio during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. These increases were primarily offset by a $15 million increase in other noninterest expenses and a $9 million ~~increase in provision for loan losses.~~

~~Other~~

~~Comparison to Prior Year Quarter~~

For the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Other segment net loss was $9 million, as compared to a net loss of $21 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015. The $12 million improvement was primarily due to an increase in noninterest income due to a $24 million decrease in the fair value of the DOJ settlement liability, partially offset by an increase in interest expenses on higher average outstanding FHLB advances and senior debt issued for TARP redemption.

~~Comparison to Prior Year to Date~~

For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, the Other segment net loss was $48 million compared to $66 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. The $18 million improvement was primarily due to an increase in noninterest income due to a $24 million decrease in the fair value of the DOJ settlement liability, primarily offset by higher average outstanding FHLB advances and senior debt issued for TARP redemption.

~~RISK MANAGEMENT~~

Like all financial services companies, we engage in certain business activities and assume the related risks. The risks we are subject to, in the normal course of business, include, but are not limited to, credit, regulatory compliance, legal, reputation, liquidity, market, operational and strategic. Our risk management activities are focused on ensuring we properly identify, measure, and manage such risks across the entire enterprise to maintain safety and soundness and maximize profitability. We hold capital to protect from the risk of unexpected loss.

A comprehensive discussion of risk management and capital matters affecting us can be found in the Risk Factors section included in Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Some of the more significant processes used to manage and control credit, liquidity, market, operational and capital risks are described in the following paragraphs.

~~Credit Risk~~

~~Mortgage Originations~~

Our Mortgage Originations segment originates, acquires and sells one-to-four family residential mortgage loans. We sell substantially all of the residential mortgage loans we produce into the secondary market on a whole loan basis or securitizing the loans into mortgage-backed securities with the Agencies. We utilize production channels to originate or acquire mortgage loans and each production channel originates mortgage loan products which are underwritten to the same standards. We expect to continue to leverage technology to streamline the mortgage origination process, thereby bringing service and convenience to brokers and correspondents. We also continue to make available to our customers various web-based tools that facilitate the mortgage loan origination process through each of our production channels. Brokers and correspondents are able to register and lock loans, check the status of inventory, deliver documents in electronic format, generate closing documents, and request funds through the Internet. Funding for our Mortgage Originations segment is provided primarily by deposits held in our Community Banking segment and borrowings.

~~Correspondent.~~ In a correspondent transaction, an unaffiliated bank or mortgage company completes the loan paperwork and also supplies the funding for the loan at closing. After the bank or mortgage company has funded the transaction, we purchase the loan at a market price. We perform a full review of each loan, whether purchased in bulk or not, purchasing only those that were originated in accordance with our underwriting guidelines. We have active correspondent relationships with 729 companies, including banks, credit unions and mortgage companies located in all 50 states.

~~Broker.~~ In a broker transaction, an unaffiliated bank or mortgage brokerage company completes several steps of the loan origination process including the loan paperwork, but the loans are underwritten on a loan-level basis to our underwriting standards and we supply the funding for the loan at closing (also known as "table funding") thereby becoming the lender of record. Currently, we have active broker relationships with 556 mortgage brokers, credit unions and mortgage brokerage companies located in all 50 states.

~~Retail.~~ Our retail channel combines two business lines, home lending and direct-to-consumer. In a home lending transaction, loans are originated through our nationwide network of stand-alone home loan centers. At September 30, 2016, we maintained 31 retail locations in 21 states. In a direct-to-consumer lending transaction, loans are originated through our Community Banking segment banking centers and from a national direct-to-consumer call center. When loans are originated on a retail basis, most aspects of the lending process are completed internally, including the origination documentation (inclusive of customer disclosures), as well as the funding of the transactions. Our centralized loan processing provides efficiencies and allows lending sales staff to focus on originations.

Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Correspondent $ 6,994
$ 6,200
$ 4,761
$ 4,115
$ 5,584
Broker 1,555
1,625
1,270
1,406
1,930
Retail 643
496
312
294
353
Total $ 9,192
$ 8,321
$ 6,343
$ 5,815
$ 7,867

Purchase originations $ 3,898
$ 3,837
$ 2,688
$ 2,875
$ 4,357
Refinance originations 5,294
4,484
3,655
2,940
3,510
Total $ 9,192
$ 8,321
$ 6,343
$ 5,815
$ 7,867

Conventional $ 5,062
$ 4,763
$ 3,799
$ 3,351
$ 4,452
Government 2,328
2,060
1,525
1,416
1,908
Jumbo 1,802
1,498
1,019
1,048
1,507
Total $ 9,192
$ 8,321
$ 6,343
$ 5,815
$ 7,867

~~Mortgage Servicing~~

The Mortgage Servicing segment services and subservices mortgage loans for others on a fee for service basis and may also collect ancillary fees and earn income through the use of noninterest bearing escrows. The Mortgage Servicing segment services residential mortgages for our own held-for-investment loan portfolio in the Community Banking segment for which it earns revenue via an intercompany service fee allocation. The segment also services and subservices loans for others, which primarily includes servicing Agency loans. Revenue for those serviced and subserviced loans is earned on a contractual fee basis, with the fees varying based on our responsibilities and the status of the underlying loans.

The following table presents the unpaid principal balance (net of write downs) of residential loans serviced and the number of accounts associated with those loans. We are a top 25 mortgage servicer in the nation.

September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Amount Number of accounts Amount Number of accounts
(Dollars in millions)
Residential loan servicing
Serviced for own loan portfolio (1)
$ 5,645
29,052
$ 6,088
30,683
Serviced for others 31,372
138,711
26,145
118,662
Subserviced for others (2)
38,801
198,400
40,244
211,740
Total residential loans serviced (2)
$ 75,818
366,163
$ 72,477
361,085


~~(1)~~	~~Includes loans held-for-investment (residential first mortgage, second mortgage, and HELOC), loans held-for-sale (residential first mortgage), loans with government guarantees and repossessed assets.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Does not include temporary short-term subservicing performed as a result of sales of servicing-released mortgage servicing rights. Includes repossessed assets.~~

~~Loans held-for-investment~~

Loans held-for-investment decreased from $6.4 billion at December 31, 2015, to $6.3 billion at September 30, 2016. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in performing residential first mortgage loans from loan sales of $1.2 billion unpaid principal balance resulting from a change in management's intent, partially offset by an increase in our higher spread, relationship-based commercial loan portfolio.

~~For further information relating to the concentration of credit of our loans held-for-investment, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, herein.~~

~~Residential first mortgage loans.~~ We originate or purchase various types of conforming and non-conforming fixed and adjustable rate loans underwritten using Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines for the purpose of purchasing or refinancing owner occupied and second home properties. The LTV requirements vary depending on occupancy, property type, loan amount, and FICO. Loans with LTVs exceeding 80 percent are required to obtain mortgage insurance.

At September 30, 2016, the largest geographic concentrations of our residential first mortgage loans in our held-for-investment portfolio were in California, Michigan and Florida, which represented 54.3 percent of such loans outstanding.

~~The following table identifies our held-for-investment residential mortgages by major category, at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:~~

Unpaid Principal Balance (1)
Average Note Rate Average Original FICO Score
Average Current FICO Score (2)
Weighted Average Maturity (months) Average Original LTV Ratio
Housing Price Index LTV, as recalculated (3)
September 30, 2016 (Dollars in millions)
Residential first mortgage loans
Amortizing $ 2,040
3.47 % 754
755
319
66.2 % 56.8 %
Interest-only (4)
70
3.67 % 758
761
324
59.4 % 50.0 %
Other (5)
10
3.55 % 710
727
259
68.8 % 58.2 %
Total residential first mortgage loans $ 2,120
3.47 % 754
755
319
66.0 % 56.6 %

December 31, 2015
Residential first mortgage loans
Amortizing $ 2,999
3.52 % 752
752
304
68.3 % 62.5 %
Interest-only (4)
64
3.48 % 753
755
320
62.0 % 55.1 %
Other (5)
13
3.29 % 710
728
268
69.0 % 62.1 %
Total residential first mortgage loans $ 3,076
3.52 % 752
752
304
68.2 % 62.4 %


~~(1)~~	~~Unpaid principal balance, net of write downs, does not include premiums or discounts.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Current FICO scores obtained at various times during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~


~~(3)~~	~~The HPI LTV is updated from the original LTV based on Metropolitan Statistical Area-level, Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight~~ ("~~OFHEO") data as of June 30, 2016.~~


~~(4)~~	~~Includes only those loans that are currently in the interest-only phase of repayment. Loans originated as interest-only that are now amortizing are included in amortizing loans.~~


~~(5)~~	~~Primarily Option ARMs.~~

~~The following table identifies our residential first mortgage loans held-for-investment by major category, at September 30, 2016:~~

September 30, 2016
Unpaid Principal Balance (1)
Average Note Rate Average Original FICO Score
Average Current FICO Score (2)
Weighted Average Maturity (months) Average Original LTV Ratio
Housing Price Index LTV, as recalculated (3)
(Dollars in millions)
Residential first mortgage loans
Amortizing
3/1 ARM $ 55
3.95 % 706
710
215
75.7 % 53.9 %
5/1 ARM 733
3.18 % 758
758
314
62.9 % 52.8 %
7/1 ARM 872
3.28 % 766
766
348
65.2 % 58.6 %
Other ARM 130
3.46 % 744
751
330
73.7 % 53.7 %
Fixed mortgage loans 250
4.85 % 717
713
254
73.4 % 63.8 %
Total amortizing 2,040
3.47 % 754
755
319
66.2 % 56.8 %
Interest-only
3/1 ARM 1
3.28 % 616
687
254
69.0 % 62.5 %
5/1 ARM 9
3.28 % 733
724
266
69.6 % 76.0 %
7/1 ARM 1
3.21 % 694
723
244
53.4 % 51.3 %
Other ARM 53
3.43 % 771
776
343
55.6 % 41.8 %
Other interest-only 6
6.50 % 711
705
266
77.2 % 81.2 %
Interest-only (4)
70
3.67 % 758
761
324
59.4 % 50.0 %
Other (5)
10
3.55 % 710
727
259
68.8 % 58.2 %
Total residential first mortgage loans $ 2,120
3.47 % 754
755
319
66.0 % 56.6 %


~~(1)~~	~~Unpaid principal balance, net of write downs, does not include premiums or discounts.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Current FICO scores obtained at various times during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~


~~(3)~~	~~The HPI LTV is updated from the original LTV based on Metropolitan Statistical Area-level OFHEO data as of June 30, 2016.~~


~~(4)~~	~~Includes only those loans that are currently in the interest-only phase of repayment. Loans originated as interest-only that are now amortizing are included in amortizing loans.~~


~~(5)~~	~~Primarily Option ARMs.~~

~~Adjustable-rate mortgage loans.~~ Adjustable rate mortgage ("ARM") loans held-for-investment were originated using Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guidelines as a base framework, and the debt-to-income ratio guidelines and documentation typically followed the automated underwriting system guidelines. Our underwriting guidelines were designed with the intent to minimize layered risk. The maximum ratios allowable for purposes of both the LTV ratio and the combined loan-to-value ("CLTV") ratio, which includes second mortgages on the same collateral, was 95 percent, but subordinate (or second mortgage) financing was not allowed over a 95 percent LTV ratio. At a 95 percent LTV ratio with private mortgage insurance, the minimum acceptable FICO score, or the "floor," was 620, and at lower LTV ratio levels, the FICO floor was also 620.

Set forth below as of September 30, 2016, are the amounts of the ARM loans in our held-for-investment loan portfolio with interest rate reset dates in the periods noted. As noted in the above table, loans may reset more than once over a three-year period and nonperforming loans do not reset while in the nonperforming status. Accordingly, the table below may include the same loans in more than one period. In addition, the table below excludes purchased loan portfolios.

1^st Quarter

2^nd Quarter

3^rd Quarter

4^th Quarter
(Dollars in millions)
2016 (1)
N/A N/A N/A $ 105
2017 $ 113
$ 118
$ 121
114
2018 115
122
124
116
Later years (2)
347
575
863
850

~~N/A - Not applicable~~


~~(1)~~	~~Reflects loans that have reset through September 30, 2016.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Later years reflect one reset period per loan.~~

~~Second mortgage loans.~~ The majority of second mortgages we currently originate are closed in conjunction with the closing of the residential first mortgages originated by us. We generally require the same levels of documentation and ratios as with our residential first mortgages. Our current allowable debt-to-income ratio for approval of second mortgages is capped at 43 percent. We currently limit the maximum CLTV to 80 percent and FICO scores to a minimum of 680. Current fixed rate loans are available with terms up to 15 years. The second mortgage loans require full documentation and are underwritten and priced to ensure high credit quality and loan profitability.

~~Home Equity Line of Credit loans.~~ Underwriting guidelines for our HELOC originations have been established to attract higher credit quality loans with long-term profitability. The minimum FICO is 680, maximum CLTV up to 89 percent, and the maximum debt-to-income ratio is 43 percent. HELOCs are adjustable-rate loans that generally contain a 10-year interest-only draw period followed by a 20-year amortizing period. We also offer HELOC loans for a term period of five to 15 years to repay. The minimum FICO is 680, maximum CLTV up to 89 percent, and the maximum debt-to-income ratio is 43 percent. Included in HELOC loans are interest-only loans. At September 30, 2016, the unpaid principal balance of our interest-only mortgage loans was $70 million.

~~Commercial loans held-for-investment.~~ During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we have continued to grow our longer term commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans. Our Business and Commercial Banking group includes relationships with relationship managers primarily throughout Michigan's major markets. Our commercial loans held-for-investment totaled $3.7 billion at September 30, 2016 and $2.7 billion at ~~December 31, 2015. The portfolio consists of three loan types: commercial real estate, commercial and industrial, and warehouse loans, each of which is discussed in more detail below.~~

~~The following table identifies the commercial loans held-for-investment portfolio by loan type and selected criteria at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:~~

Commercial Loans Held-for-Investment
September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Balance Average Note Rate Balance Average Note Rate
(Dollars in millions)
Commercial real estate loans:
Fixed rate $ 55
4.8 % $ 52
4.9 %
Adjustable rate 1,118
3.2 % 769
2.8 %
Total commercial real estate loans (1)
1,173
821

Net deferred fees and other (5 ) (7 )
Total commercial real estate loans, net $ 1,168
$ 814

Commercial and industrial loans:
Fixed rate $ 86
4.2 % $ 44
4.7 %
Adjustable rate 629
3.8 % 512
3.0 %
Total commercial and industrial loans 715
556

Net deferred fees and other (7 ) (4 )
Total commercial and industrial loans, net $ 708
$ 552

Warehouse loans:
Adjustable rate $ 1,835
3.4 % $ 1,367
3.4 %
Net deferred fees and other (41 ) (31 )
Total warehouse loans, net $ 1,794
$ 1,336

Total commercial loans:
Fixed rate $ 141
4.4 % $ 96
4.8 %
Adjustable rate 3,582
3.4 % 2,648
3.1 %
Total commercial loans 3,723
2,744

Net deferred fees and other (53 ) (42 )
Total commercial loans, net $ 3,670
$ 2,702


~~(1)~~	~~Includes $252 million and $188 million, respectively, of commercial owner occupied real estate loans at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015.~~

~~Commercial real estate loans.~~ Our commercial real estate held-for-investment loan portfolio is comprised of loans that are collateralized by real estate properties intended to be income-producing in the normal course of business. This portfolio also includes owner occupied real estate loans, in addition to secured home builder loans.

The following table discloses our total unpaid principal balance (net of write downs) of commercial real estate held-for-investment loans by borrower geographic concentration and collateral type at September 30, 2016:

State
Collateral Type Michigan Florida California Other Total (1)
(Dollars in millions)
Office $ 188
$ —
$ 7
$ —
$ 195
Retail 126
33
9
20
188
Apartments 130
—
—
42
172
Industrial 131
—
25
4
160
Single family residence, which includes land 44
21
—
53
118
Hotel/motel 62
—
—
—
62
Parking Garage/Lot 58
—
—
—
58
Special Purpose 49
1
1
—
51
Senior living facility 42
—
—
—
42
Shopping Center 36
—
—
4
40
Non Profit 32
—
—
—
32
Other 15
8
12
20
55
Total $ 913
$ 63
$ 54
$ 143
$ 1,173
Percent 77.8 % 5.4 % 4.6 % 12.2 % 100.0 %


~~(1)~~	~~Unpaid principal balance, net of write downs, does not include premiums or discounts.~~

~~Includes $252 million of commercial owner occupied real estate loans at September 30, 2016.~~

~~Commercial and industrial loans.~~ Commercial and industrial held-for-investment loan facilities typically include lines of credit and term loans to small and middle market businesses for use in normal business operations to finance working capital needs, equipment purchases, and expansion projects. Most of our commercial and industrial loans earn interest at a variable rate and we offer our customers the ability to enter into interest rate swaps for which we offset our risk by entering into offsetting market trades.

~~Warehouse lending.~~ We also offer warehouse lines of credit to other mortgage lenders. These allow the lender to fund the closing of residential first mortgage loans. Each extension or draw-down on the line is collateralized by mortgage loans being funded and is paid off once the underlying loan is sold to an outside investor which may be ourselves. Underlying mortgage loans are predominately originated using the agencies' underwriting standards. We believe we are increasing market share in the warehouse lending market through our strategic initiative to increase lending to customers who originate loans they then sell to outside third party investors. The aggregate committed amount of adjustable rate warehouse lines of credit granted to other mortgage lenders at September 30, 2016 was $2.7 billion, of which $1.8 billion was outstanding, compared to $2.2 billion at December 31, 2015, of which $1.3 billion was outstanding.

~~Credit Quality~~

Management considers a number of qualitative and quantitative factors in assessing the level of our allowance for loan losses. See the section captioned "Allowance for Loan Losses" in this discussion. As illustrated in the following tables, trends in certain credit quality characteristics such as nonperforming loans and past due statistics continue to show improvement. This is predominantly a result of the nonperforming and TDR loan sales, as well as run off of the legacy portfolios and the addition of new loans with strong credit characteristics to the held-for-investment portfolio.Statements.

The following ~~table sets forth certain information about our nonperforming assets as of the end of each of the last five quarters:~~

~~NONPERFORMING LOANS AND ASSETS~~

September 30,
2016 June 30,
2016 March 31,
2016 December 31,
2015 September 30,
2015
(Dollars in millions)
Nonperforming loans held-for-investment $ 23
$ 23
$ 27
$ 31
$ 37
Nonperforming TDRs 8
6
6
7
6
Nonperforming TDRs at inception but performing for less than six months 9
15
20
28
20
Total nonperforming loans held-for-investment (1)
40
44
53
66
63
Real estate and other nonperforming assets 15
19
14
17
17
Nonperforming assets held-for-investment, net $ 55
$ 63
$ 67
$ 83
$ 80
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets 0.39 % 0.46 % 0.49 % 0.61 % 0.64 %
Ratio of nonperforming loans held-for-investment to loans held-for-investment 0.63 % 0.76 % 0.95 % 1.05 % 1.15 %
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to loans held-for-investment (2)
2.30 % 2.62 % 2.93 % 3.00 % 3.66 %
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to LHFI and loans with government guarantees (2) 2.16 % 2.43 % 2.70 % 2.78 % 3.34 %
Ratio of net charge-offs to average loans held-for-investment (annualized) (2)
0.51 % 0.62 % 0.86 % 0.62 % 1.84 %
Ratio of nonperforming assets to loans held-for-investment and repossessed assets 0.87 % 1.09 % 1.20 % 1.32 % 1.45 %
Ratio of nonperforming assets to Tier 1 capital + allowance for loan losses 4.03 % 3.79 % 4.15 % 5.12 % 5.03 %


~~(1)~~	Does not include nonperforming loans held-for-sale of $5 million, $5 million, $6 million, $12 million and $14 million at September 30, 2016, June 30, 2016, March 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and September 30, 2015, respectively.


~~(2)~~	~~Excludes loans carried under the fair value option.~~

~~Past due loans held-for-investment~~

For all portfolios within the consumer and commercial loan portfolio, loans are placed on nonaccrual status when any portion of principal or interest is 90 days past due (or nonperforming), or earlier when we become aware of information indicating that collection of principal and interest is in doubt. While it is the goal of management to collect on loans, we attempt to work out a satisfactory repayment schedule or modification with past due borrowers and will undertake foreclosure proceedings if the delinquency is not satisfactorily resolved. Our practices regarding past due loans are designed to both assist borrowers in meeting their contractual obligations and minimize losses incurred by the Bank. When a loan is placed on nonaccrual status, the accrued interest income is reversed. Loans return to accrual status when principal and interest become currentASUs have been issued and are anticipated to be fully collectible. At September 30, 2016, we had $48 million of past due loans held-for-investment. Of those past due loans, $40 million were nonperforming. At December 31, 2015, we had $80 million of past due loans held-for-investment. Of those past due loans, $66 million were nonperforming. The decrease from December 31, 2015 to September 30, 2016 was primarily due to improved asset quality and the sale of nonperforming residential first mortgage loans.

~~Consumer loans.~~ As of September 30, 2016, nonperforming consumer loans decreased from December 31, 2015, primarily due to the sale of nonperforming residential first mortgage loans. Net charge-offs in consumer loans totaled $7 million and $28 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016, respectively, compared to $21 million and $81 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, primarily due to the charge-offs of $8 million and $67 million related to the sale or transfer of loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively.

~~Commercial loans.~~ As of September 30, 2016, there were no nonperforming commercial loans, compared to $2 million at December 31, 2015. There were no net charge-offs in commercial loans for the nine months ended September 30, 2016, compared to recoveries of $2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

~~The following table sets forth information regarding past due loans held-for-investment at the dates listed:~~

Days Past Due September 30,
2016 December 31,
2015
(Dollars in millions)
30 – 59 days
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage $ 4
$ 7
HELOC 1
2
Other 1
1
Total 30-59 days past due 6
10
60 – 89 days
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage
1
3
HELOC —
1
Other 1
—
Total 60-89 days past due 2
4
90 days or greater
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage 29
53
Second mortgage 4
2
HELOC 7
9
Commercial loans
Commercial and industrial —
2
Total 90 days or greater past due (1)
40
66
Total past due loans $ 48
$ 80


~~(1)~~	~~Includes performing nonaccrual loans that are less than 90 days delinquent and for which interest cannot be accrued.~~

The $32 million decrease in total past due loans at September 30, 2016, compared to December 31, 2015 was primarily due to improved asset quality coupled with the sale of $20 million of nonperforming residential first mortgage loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The 30 to 59 days past due loans decreased to $6 million at September 30, 2016, compared to $10 million at December 31, 2015, primarily driven by improved asset quality.

~~The following table sets forth information regarding loans held-for-investment and nonperforming loans (i.e., 90 days or greater past due loans) as to which we have ceased accruing interest:~~

September 30, 2016

Loans
Held-for-Investment

Nonaccrual
Loans

As a % of
Loan
Specified
Portfolio

As a % of
Nonaccrual
Loans
(Dollars in millions)
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage $ 2,136
$ 29
1.4 % 72.5 %
Second mortgage 127
4
3.1 % 10.0 %
HELOC 326
7
2.1 % 17.5 %
Other consumer 30
—
— % — %
Total consumer loans 2,619
40
1.5 % 100.0 %
Commercial loans
Commercial real estate 1,168
—
— % — %
Commercial and industrial 708
—
— % — %
Warehouse lending 1,795
—
— % — %
Total commercial loans 3,671
—
— % — %
Total loans (1)
$ 6,290
$ 40
0.6 % 100.0 %
Less allowance for loan losses (143 )
Total loans held-for-investment, net $ 6,147


~~(1)~~	~~Includes~~ ~~$12 million~~ ~~of nonaccrual loans carried under the fair value option at September 30, 2016.~~

~~Troubled debt restructurings (held-for-investment)~~

~~The following table provides a summary of TDRs by performing status:~~

TDRs Held-for-Investment
Performing Nonperforming Total
(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2016
Consumer loans (1)
$ 70
$ 17
$ 87
Commercial loans (2)
1
—
1
Total TDRs $ 71
$ 17
$ 88
December 31, 2015
Consumer loans (1)
$ 101
$ 35
$ 136
Total TDRs $ 101
$ 35
$ 136


~~(1)~~	Consumer loans include: residential first mortgage, second mortgage, HELOC and other consumer loans. The allowance for loan losses on consumer TDR loans totaled $11 million and $15 million at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.


~~(2)~~	~~Commercial loans include: commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and warehouse loans.~~

Troubled debt restructurings ("TDRs") are modified loans in which a borrower demonstrates financial difficulties and for which a concession has been granted. The decrease of $48 million in our total TDR loans at September 30, 2016, compared to December 31, 2015 was primarily due to the sale of TDR loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. Nonperforming TDRs were 42.5 percent and 53.4 percent of total nonperforming loans at September 30, 2016 and ~~December 31, 2015, respectively.~~

Nonperforming TDRs are included in nonaccrual loans. TDRs remain in nonperforming status until a borrower has made at least six consecutive months of payments under the modified terms. Performing TDRs are excluded from nonaccrual loans because it is reasonably assured that all contractual principal and interest due under the restructured terms will be collected. Within consumer nonperforming loans, residential first mortgage TDRs were 35 percent of residential first mortgage nonperforming loans at September 30, 2016, compared to 51 percent at December 31, 2015.

~~The following table sets forth the activity during each of the periods presented with respect to performing TDRs and nonperforming TDRs:~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
Performing (Dollars in millions)
Beginning balance $ 73
$ 108
$ 101
$ 362
    Additions —
16
7
67
Transfer to nonperforming TDR (1 ) (7 ) (7 ) (12 )
Transfer from nonperforming TDR 6
—
11
1
    Principal repayments (1 ) (1 ) (3 ) (3 )
    Reductions (1)
(6 ) (19 ) (38 ) (318 )
Ending balance $ 71
$ 97
$ 71
$ 97
Nonperforming
Beginning balance $ 21
$ 24
$ 35
$ 46
    Additions —
3
5
13
    Transfer from performing TDR 1
7
7
12
    Transfer to performing TDR (6 ) —
(11 ) (1 )
    Principal repayments (1 ) —
(1 ) —
    Reductions (1)
2
(8 ) (18 ) (44 )
Ending balance $ 17
$ 26
$ 17
$ 26


~~(1)~~	~~Includes loans paid in full or otherwise settled, sold or charged-off.~~

~~Allowance for Loan Losses~~

~~The allowance for loan losses represents management's estimate of probable losses that are inherent in our loans held-for-investment portfolio but which have~~ not yet been realized. The consumer loan portfolio includes residential first mortgages, second mortgages, HELOC, and other consumer loans. The commercial loan portfolio includes commercial real estate, commercial and industrial and warehouse lending. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information.

~~The allowance for loan losses decreased $44 million to~~ ~~$143 million~~ at September 30, 2016, compared to $187 million at December 31, 2015. The decrease from December 31, 2015 was primarily driven by a decrease in the amount of residential first mortgage loans as a result of sales along with the sale of $110 million unpaid principal balance of nonperforming, TDR and non-agency loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans held-for-investment decreased to 2.3 percent as of September 30, 2016 from 3.0 percent as of December 31, 2015. At September 30, 2016, we had a 3.8 percent allowance coverage of our consumer loan portfolio. The commercial loan allowance for loan losses coverage ratio was 1.3 percent at September 30, 2016, reflecting the percentage of warehouse loans in the portfolio and improved level of overall quality.

~~The following tables set forth certain information regarding the allocation of our allowance for loan losses to each loan category:~~

September 30, 2016

Loans
Held-for-Investment

Percent
of
Portfolio

Allowance
Amount
Allowance as a Percent of Loan Portfolio
(Dollars in millions)
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage (1)
$ 2,136
33.9 % $ 70
3.3 %
Second mortgage 127
2.0 % 9
7.1 %
HELOC 326
5.2 % 16
4.9 %
Other 30
0.5 % 1
3.3 %
Total consumer loans 2,619
41.6 % 96
3.7 %
Commercial loans
Commercial real estate 1,168
18.6 % 25
2.1 %
Commercial and industrial 708
11.3 % 14
2.0 %
Warehouse lending 1,795
28.5 % 8
0.4 %
Total commercial loans 3,671
58.4 % 47
1.3 %
Total consumer and commercial loans (2)
$ 6,290
100.0 % $ 143
2.3 %


~~(1)~~	~~Includes the allowance related to loans with government guarantees.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Excludes loans carried under the fair value option.~~

~~ACTIVITY IN THE ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES~~

Three Months Ended September 30, Nine Months Ended September 30,
2016 2015 2016 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Beginning balance $ 150
$ 222
$ 187
$ 297
Provision (benefit) for loan losses (3)
—
(1 ) (16 ) (18 )
Charge-offs
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage (7 ) (21 ) (26 ) (80 )
Second mortgage —
(1 ) (2 ) (2 )
HELOC (1 ) (1 ) (2 ) (2 )
Other consumer (1 ) (1 ) (3 ) (3 )
Total consumer loans (9 ) (24 ) (33 ) (87 )
Commercial loans
Commercial real estate —
—
—
—
Commercial and industrial —
(3 ) —
(3 )
Warehouse lending —
—
—
—
Total commercial loans —
(3 ) —
(3 )
Total charge offs (9 ) (27 ) (33 ) (90 )
Recoveries
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage —
1
1
3
Second mortgage —
1
1
1
HELOC 1
—
1
—
Other consumer 1
1
2
2
Total consumer loans 2
3
5
6
Commercial loans
Commercial real estate —
—
—
2
Total recoveries 2
3
5
8
Charge-offs, net of recoveries (7 ) (24 ) (28 ) (82 )

Ending balance $ 143
$ 197
$ 143
$ 197
Net charge-off to LHFI ratio (1)
0.51 % 1.84 % 0.66 % 2.34 %
Net charge-off ratio, adjusted (1) (2)
0.15 % 0.61 % 0.15 % 0.43 %


~~(1)~~	~~Excludes loans carried under the fair value option.~~

~~(2)~~

Excludes charge-offs of zero and $16 million related to the sale or transfer of loans during the three months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively, and $8 million and $67 million related to the transfer and subsequent sale of loans during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and September 30, 2015, respectively. Also excludes charge-offs related to loans with government guarantees of $6 million and $13 million during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.


~~(3)~~	Does not include $7 million provision for loan losses recorded in the Consolidated Statements of Operations to reserve for repossessed loans with government guarantees during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016.

~~Liquidity Risk~~

We primarily originate Agency-eligible loans held-for-sale and therefore the majority of new residential first mortgage loan originations are readily convertible to cash, either by selling them as part of our monthly Agency sales, private party whole loan sales, or by pledging them to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis and borrowing against them. We use the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis as a significant source for funding our residential mortgage banking business due to our flexibility in terms of being able to borrow or repay borrowings as daily cash needs require.

Our principal uses of funds include loan originations and operating expenses. At September 30, 2016, we had outstanding rate-lock commitments of $6.5 billion, compared to $3.8 billion at December 31, 2015. The increase in rate-lock commitments was driven by the lower interest rate environment at September 30, 2016. Total commitments were $9.0 billion at September 30, 2016 and $5.5 billion at December 31, 2015. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on commitments.

In addition to operating expenses at a particular level of mortgage originations, our cash flows are fairly predictable and relate primarily to the funding of cash outflows to originate or purchase residential first mortgages and cash inflows from sales of those residential first mortgages. Our mortgage warehouse funding line of business also generates cash flows as funds are extended to correspondent relationships to close new loans. Those loans are repaid when the correspondent sells the loan. Other material cash flows relate to growing our commercial lines of business and the loans we service for others and consist primarily of monthly principal, interest, taxes and insurance escrow payments.

Our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows shows cash used in operating activities of $10.1 billion and $7.1 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively. This primarily reflects our mortgage operations and is a reflection of the manner in which we execute certain loan sales for which the cash outflow is included in operating activities and the corresponding cash inflow is included in the investing section.

As governed and defined by our internal liquidity policy, we maintain adequate excess liquidity levels appropriate to cover unanticipated liquidity needs. In addition to this liquidity, we also maintain targeted minimum levels of unused collateralized borrowing capacity as another cushion against unexpected liquidity needs. Each business day, we forecast 90 days of daily cash needs. This allows us to determine our projected near term daily cash fluctuations and also to plan and adjust, if necessary, future activities. As a result, in an adverse environment, we would be able to make adjustments to operations as required to meet the liquidity needs of our business, including adjusting deposit rates to increase deposits, planning for additional Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings, accelerating sales of loans held-for-sale (agencies and/or private), selling loans held-for-investment or securities, borrowing through the use of repurchase agreements, reducing originations, making changes to warehouse funding facilities, or borrowing from the discount window.

Our liquidity position is continuously monitored and adjustments are made to the balance between sources and uses of funds as deemed appropriate. Management is not aware of any events that are reasonably likelyexpected to have a material ~~adverse effect~~impact on our ~~liquidity, capital resources or operations.~~

~~Parent Company Liquidity~~

The Company obtains its liquidity from multiple sources, including dividends from the Bank and the issuance of debt and equity securities. The primary uses of the Company's liquidity are debt service, dividends to common and preferred stockholders, capital contributions to the Bank and operating expenses. The Company's most liquid assets are cash it holds at the Bank and interest-bearing demand accounts at correspondent banks, all of which totaled $73 million at September 30, 2016.

The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency ("OCC") regulates all capital distributions made by the Bank, directly or indirectly, to the holding company, including dividend payments. A subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, such as the Bank, must file a notice or application with the OCC at least 30 days prior to each proposed capital distribution. Whether an application is required is based on a number of factors including whether the institution qualifies for expedited treatment under the OCC rules and regulations or if the total amount of all capital distributions (including each proposed capital distribution) for the applicable calendar year exceeds net income for that year to date plus the retained net income for the preceding two years. Under the Consent Order, the Bank may not pay a dividend or make a capital distribution if it is not in compliance with its approved capital plan or would not remain in compliance after making the dividend or capital distribution, and the Bank must receive OCC approval under the generally applicable application or notice requirements. In addition, as a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company, the Bank must receive approval from the Federal Reserve Bank ("FRB") before declaring any dividends. Additional restrictions on dividends apply if the Bank fails the Qualified Thrift Lending ("QTL") test. We anticipate that as long as we remain under the consent order, we will be required to obtain approval from the OCC prior to any capital distribution.

~~For additional details and restrictions related to the Bank’s payment of dividends, refer to the Capital section of Management’s discussion and analysis within this form 10-Q.~~

~~Deposits~~

Our deposits consist of three primary categories: retail deposits, government deposits, and company controlled deposits. Total deposits increased $1.4 billion, or 18 percent at September 30, 2016, compared to December 31, 2015, primarily due to increases in company controlled deposits.

We have continued to focus on increasing our core deposit accounts such as branch and commercial demand deposits, savings and money market accounts. These core deposits provide a lower cost funding source to the Bank. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, our core deposits increased $196 million primarily driven by growth in commercial demand deposits, partially offset by a decline in retail money market demand accounts.

We utilize local governmental agencies, and other public units, as an additional source for deposit funding. These deposit accounts include $372 million of certificates of deposit with maturities typically less than one year and $804 million in checking and savings accounts at September 30, 2016.

Company controlled deposits arise due to our servicing of loans for others and represent the portion of the investor custodial accounts on deposit with the Bank. Certain deposits require us to reimburse the owner for the spread on these funds. This cost is a component of net loan administration income. During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, these deposits increased $869 million, primarily due to taxes not yet paid out.

We participate in the Certificates of Deposit Account Registry Service ("CDARS") program, through which certain customer certificates of deposit ("CD") are exchanged for CDs of similar amounts from other participating banks. This gives customers the potential to receive FDIC insurance up to $50 million. At September 30, 2016, we had $249 million of total CDs enrolled in the CDARS program.

~~The composition of our deposits was as follows:~~

September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Balance Yield/Rate % of Deposits Balance Yield/Rate % of Deposits
Retail deposits
Branch retail deposits
Demand deposit accounts $ 830
0.05 % 8.9 % $ 797
0.07 % 10.0 %
Savings accounts 3,745
0.77 % 40.0 % 3,717
0.79 % 46.8 %
Money market demand accounts 142
0.14 % 1.5 % 163
0.15 % 2.1 %
Certificates of deposit/CDARS (1)
1,075
1.03 % 11.5 % 811
0.86 % 10.2 %
Total branch retail deposits 5,792
0.70 % 61.8 % 5,488
0.68 % 69.2 %
Commercial retail deposits
Demand deposit accounts 287
0.16 % 3.1 % 194
0.41 % 2.4 %
Savings accounts 49
0.52 % 0.5 % 34
0.56 % 0.4 %
Money market demand accounts 151
0.78 % 1.6 % 104
0.76 % 1.3 %
Certificates of deposit/CDARS (1)
8
1.25 % 0.1 % 14
1.03 % 0.2 %
Total commercial retail deposits 495
0.41 % 5.3 % 346
0.55 % 4.3 %
Total retail deposits subtotal $ 6,287
0.68 % 67.1 % $ 5,834
0.67 % 73.5 %
Government deposits
Demand deposit accounts $ 273
0.39 % 2.9 % $ 302
0.39 % 3.8 %
Savings accounts 531
0.53 % 5.7 % 363
0.51 % 4.6 %
Certificates of deposit/CDARS (1)
372
0.70 % 4.0 % 397
0.55 % 5.0 %
Total government deposits (2)
1,176
0.55 % 12.5 % 1,062
0.49 % 13.4 %
Company controlled deposits (3)
1,908
— % 20.4 % 1,039
— % 13.1 %
Total deposits (4)
$ 9,371
0.52 % 100.0 % $ 7,935
0.56 % 100.0 %


~~(1)~~	~~The aggregate amount of certificates of deposit with a minimum denomination of $100,000 was approximately $1.1 billion and $0.9 billion at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.~~


~~(2)~~	~~Government deposits include funds from municipalities and schools.~~


~~(3)~~	These accounts represent a portion of the investor custodial accounts and escrows controlled by us in connection with loans serviced, or subserviced for others and that have been placed on deposit with the Bank.


~~(4)~~	~~The aggregate amount of deposits with a balance over $250,000 was approximately $3.7 billion and $3.4 billion at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.~~

~~Borrowings~~

The Federal Home Loan Bank provides loans, also referred to as advances, on a fully collateralized basis, to savings banks and other member financial institutions. We are currently authorized through a resolution of our board of directors to apply for advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank using approved loan types as collateral. At September 30, 2016, we had the authority and approval from the Federal Home Loan Bank to utilize a line of credit of up to $7.0 billion and we may access that line to the extent that collateral is provided. At September 30, 2016, we had $2.5 billion of advances outstanding and an additional $2.0 billion of collateralized borrowing capacity available at the Federal Home Loan Bank.

We have arrangements with the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago to borrow, as appropriate, from its discount window. The discount window is a borrowing facility that is intended to be used only for short-term liquidity needs arising from special or unusual circumstances. The amount we are allowed to borrow is based on the lendable value of the collateral that we provide. To collateralize the line, we pledge commercial and industrial loans that are eligible based on Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago guidelines. At September 30, 2016, we had pledged commercial and industrial loans amounting to $517 million with a lendable value of $508 million. At December 31, 2015, we had pledged commercial and industrial loans amounting to $75 million with a lendable value of $45 million. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had no borrowings outstanding against this line of credit. We also have access to overnight borrowings from various counterparty banks that settle through the Federal Reserve Bank. At September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had $20 million and no borrowings outstanding on these short-term borrowings, respectively.

~~Federal Home Loan Bank advances.~~ ~~Federal Home Loan Bank advances decreased $1,079 million to $2,462 million at September 30, 2016 from $3,541 million at December 31, 2015. We rely upon advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank~~

as a source of funding for the origination or purchase of loans for sale in the secondary market and for providing duration specific short-term and long-term financing. The outstanding balance of Federal Home Loan Bank advances fluctuates from time to time depending on our current inventory of mortgage loans held-for-sale and the availability of lower cost funding sources. Our portfolio includes short-term fixed and variable rate advances, long-term LIBOR adjustable advances, and long-term fixed rate advances. Interest rates on the LIBOR index advances reset every three-months and the advances may be prepaid without penalty, with notification, at scheduled three-month intervals after an initial 12-month lockout period.

~~Debt.~~ As part of our overall capital strategy, we previously raised capital through the issuance of junior subordinated notes to our special purpose trusts formed for the offerings, which issued preferred stock (trust preferred securities). The junior subordinated notes are callable by us at any time. Interest is payable on a quarterly basis; however, we may defer interest payments for up to 20 quarters without default or penalty. In January, 2012, we exercised our contractual right to defer regularly scheduled quarterly payments of interest. On July 14, 2016, we ended the deferral and made a $34 million payment to bring current our previously deferred interest as of that date.

We issued $250 million of 2021 senior notes on July 11, 2016 (“2021 Senior Notes”). The proceeds from these notes were used to bring current and redeem our outstanding Series C Preferred Stock. The notes will be effectively subordinated to Flagstar Bancorp, Inc.’s secured indebtedness.

~~See Note 9 of the Notes to the~~ Consolidated Financial Statements ~~for further information about Federal Home Loan Bank advances and other long-term debt.~~

~~Market Risk~~

~~Market risk is the risk of reduced earnings and~~ and/or declines in the net market value of the balance sheet primarily due to changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates, or equity prices. We do not have any material foreign currency exchange risk or equity price risk. The primary market risk is interest rate risk and results from timing differences in the repricing of our assets and liabilities, changes in the relationships between rate indices, and the potential exercise of explicit or embedded options.

Interest rate risk is monitored by the asset liability committee ("ALCO"), which is composed of our executive officers and other members of management, in accordance with policies approved by our board of directors. In determining the appropriate level of interest rate risk, the ALCO considers the impact projected interest rate scenarios have on earnings and capital, liquidity, business strategies, and other factors. The ALCO meets monthly or as deemed necessary to review, among other things, the sensitivity of assets and liabilities to interest rate changes, the book and fair values of assets and liabilities, unrealized gains and losses, purchase and sale activity, loans held-for-sale and commitments to originate loans, and the maturities of investments, borrowings and time deposits.

~~Financial instruments used to manage interest rate risk include derivative financial instruments such as interest rate swaps and forward sales commitments. Further discussion of the use of and the~~significant accounting for derivative instruments is included in Notes 8 and 17 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. All of our derivatives are accounted for at fair market value. All mortgage loan production originated for sale is accounted for on a fair value basis.

The following table is a summary of the changes in our net interest income that are projected to result from hypothetical changes in market interest rates. The interest rate scenarios presented in the table include interest rates as of September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 and adjusted by instantaneous parallel rate changes plus or minus 200 basis points. The minus 200 basis point shock scenario is a flattener scenario as rates are floored at zero given the current interest rate levels.

September 30, 2016
Scenario Net interest income $ Change % Change
(Dollars in millions)
200 $ 356
$ 52
17.0 %
Constant 304
—
— %
(200) 256
(48 ) (16.0 )%
December 31, 2015
Scenario Net interest income $ Change % Change
(Dollars in millions)
200 $ 312
$ 6
2.0 %
Constant 306
—
— %
(200) 258
(48 ) (16.0 )%

At September 30, 2016, the $2 million decline in the net interest margin in the constant scenario as compared to December 31, 2015, was primarily driven by a decreased yield on other investments and consumer loans.

We have also projected the potential impact to net interest income in a hypothetical "bear flattener" interest rate scenario as of September 30, 2016. When increasing short-term interest rates instantaneously by 100 basis points and holding the longer term interest rates unchanged, the decrease to net interest income over a 12-month and 24-month period based on our forecasted balance sheet is a loss of $21 million and $27 million, respectively.

In the net interest income simulation, our balance sheet exhibits slight asset sensitivity. When interest rates rise our interest income increases, conversely when interest rates fall our interest income decreases. The net interest income simulation measures the interest rate risk of the balance sheet over a short period of time, typically 12 months. An additional analysis is completed that measures the interest rate risk over an extended period of time. The Economic Value of Equity ("EVE") analysis provides a fair value of the balance sheet in alternative interest rate scenarios. The EVE analysis does not take into account management intervention and assumes the new rate environment is constant and the change is instantaneous.

The following table is a summary of the changes in our EVE that are projected to result from hypothetical changes in market interest rates. EVE is the market value of assets, less the market value of liabilities, adjusted for the market value of off-balance sheet instruments. The interest rate scenarios presented in the table include interest rates at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, and as adjusted by instantaneous parallel rate changes upward to 300 basis points and downward to 100 basis points. The scenarios are not comparable due to differences in the interest rate environments, including the absolute level of rates and the shape of the yield curve. Each rate scenario reflects unique prepayment, repricing, and reinvestment assumptions. Management derives these assumptions by considering published market prepayment expectations, the repricing characteristics of individual instruments or groups of similar instruments, our historical experience, and our asset and liability management strategy. Further, this analysis assumes that certain instruments would not be affected by the changes in interest rates or would be partially affected due to the characteristics of the instruments.

Further, as this framework evaluates risks to the current statement of financial condition only, changes to the volumes and pricing of new business opportunities that can be expected in the different interest rate outcomes are not incorporated in this analytical framework. For instance, analysis of our history suggests that declining interest rate levels are associated with higher loan production volumes at higher levels of profitability. While this "natural business hedge" historically offsets most, if not all, of the identified risks associated with declining interest rate scenarios, these factors fall outside of the EVE framework. Further, there can be no assurance that this natural business hedge would positively affect the economic value of equity in the same manner and to the same extent as in the past.

September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Scenario EVE EVE% $ Change % Change Scenario EVE EVE% $ Change % Change
(Dollars in millions) (Dollars in millions)
300 $ 1,998
14.1 % $ (4 ) (0.2 )% 300 $ 1,788
14.6 % $ (247 ) (12.1 )%
200 2,030
14.3 % 27
1.4 % 200 1,889
14.9 % (146 ) (7.2 )%
100 2,043
14.4 % 41
2.0 % 100 1,978
15.1 % (57 ) (2.8 )%
Current 2,002
14.1 % —
— % Current 2,035
15.0 % —
— %
(100) 1,879
13.2 % (123 ) (6.2 )% (100) 2,001
14.7 % (34 ) (1.7 )%

~~Mortgage servicing rights~~

At September 30, 2016, MSRs at fair value increased $6 million to $302 million, compared to $296 million at December 31, 2015, primarily due to additions from loan sales where we retained servicing, partially offset by actual and pending MSR sales and higher prepayments.

Once fully phased in, the Basel III capital rules will significantly reduce the allowable amount of the fair value of MSRs included in Tier 1 capital. Our ratio of MSRs to Tier 1 capital was 24.6 percent and 20.6 percent at September 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. As of September 30, 2016, we have pending MSR sales with a fair value of $50 million expected to close in the fourth quarter 2016. These sales represent nearly all of the Company's remaining Ginnie Mae MSRs and will significantly reduce the mortgage servicing asset as we work to prepare for Basel III final phase-in capital requirements as discussed above.

~~The principal balance of the loans underlying our total MSRs was $31.4 billion at September 30, 2016, compared to $26.1 billion at~~ ~~December 31, 2015, primarily attributable to an increase in servicing loan volume, partially offset by loan payoffs and MSR sales of $12.7 billion in underlying loans.~~

~~For further information relating to the mortgage servicing rights, see Note 7 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, herein.~~

~~Operational Risk~~

~~Loans with government guarantees~~

The amount of loans with government guarantees totaled $404 million at September 30, 2016 and the loans which we have not yet repurchased but had the unilateral right to repurchase totaled $21 million and were classified as loans with government guarantees. At ~~December 31, 2015~~, loans with government guarantees totaled $485 million and those loans which we had not yet repurchased but had the unilateral right to repurchase totaled $9 million and were classified as loans with government guarantees. The balance of this portfolio decreased at September 30, 2016, primarily due to loans with government guarantees transferred to held-for-sale and loan liquidations, partially offset by an increase in repurchased loans.

Substantially all of these loans continue to be insured or guaranteed by the Federal Housing Administration ("FHA") or the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and management believes that the reimbursement process is proceeding appropriately. These repurchased loans earn interest at a statutory rate, which varies for each loan, but is based on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note rate at the time the loan becomes greater than 60 days delinquent. Certain loans within our portfolio may be subject to indemnifications and insurance limits which exposes us to limited credit risk. We have reserved for these risks within other assets and as a component of our allowance for loan losses on residential first mortgages.

~~For further information on loans with government guarantees, see Note 5 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, herein.~~

~~Representation and warranty reserve~~

~~When we sell mortgage loans, we make customary representations and warranties to the purchasers, including sponsored securitization trusts and their insurers (primarily Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac).~~

During the nine months ended September 30, 2016, we had $14 million in Fannie Mae new repurchase demands and $10 million in Freddie Mac new repurchase demands. These amounts are down as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2015 when we had $75 million in Fannie Mae new repurchase demands and $23 million in Freddie Mac new repurchase demands.policies:



Standard	Description	Effective Date
ASU 2017-08	Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20): Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities	January 1, 2019
ASU 2017-07

~~The following table summarizes the trends with respect to key model attributes and assumptions for estimating the representation and warranty reserve:~~

September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
(Dollars in millions)
UPB of loans sold (1)
$ 176,870
$ 162,301
Losses expected from put-backs (percent of loans sold) (2)
0.03 % 0.03 %

Compensation - Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost		January 1, 2018
~~(1)~~ASU 2017-06	~~Includes original unpaid principal balance of 2009~~	Plan Accounting - Defined Benefit Pension Plans (Topic 960), Defined Contribution Pension Plans (Topic 962), Health and ~~later vintage loans sold to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through September 30, 2016.~~

Welfare Benefit Plans (Topic 965): Employee Benefit Plan Master Trust Reporting		January 1, 2019
~~(2)~~ASU 2017-05	~~Estimated losses~~	Other Income - Gains and Losses from ~~expected repurchases to be made (post appeal loss).~~

~~See Note 10 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.~~

~~Capital~~

Under the capital distribution regulations, a savings bank that is a subsidiary of a savings and loan holding company must either notify or seek approval from the OCC of a capital distribution at least 30 days prior to the declaration of a dividend or the approval by the board of directors of the proposed capital distribution. The 30-day period allows the OCC to determine whether the distribution would not be advisable. Because we are under the Consent Order, we currently must seek approval from the OCC prior to making a capital distribution from the Bank. Also, under Federal Reserve requirements, the Bank must provide a 30-day notice to the Federal Reserve prior to declaring or paying dividends. In addition, under the Supervisory Agreement, the Company agreed to request prior non-objection of the Federal Reserve to pay dividends or other capital distributions. We seek to manage our capital levels and overall business in a manner which we consider to be prudent and work with our regulators to ensure that our capital levels are appropriate considering our risk profile and evaluation of the capital levels maintained by peer institutions.

~~Consent Orders~~

Effective October 23, 2012, the Bank's board of directors executed a Stipulation and Consent (the "Stipulation"), accepting the issuance of a Consent Order (the "Consent Order") by the OCC. The Consent Order replaced the supervisory agreement entered into between the Bank and the Office of Thrift Supervision (the "OTS") on January 27, 2010, which the OCC terminated simultaneous with issuance of the Consent Order. For further information and a complete description of all of the terms of the Consent Order, please refer to the copy of the Consent Order filed with the SEC as an exhibit to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 24, 2012.

On September 29, 2014, the Bank entered into a Consent Order with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the "CFPB"). The Consent Order relates to alleged violations of federal consumer financial laws arising from the Bank’s residential

first mortgage loan loss mitigation practices and default servicing operations dating back to 2011. Under the terms of the Consent Order, the Bank paid $28 million for borrower remediation and $10 million in civil money penalties. The settlement does not involve any admission of wrongdoing on the part of the Bank or our employees, directors, officers, or agents. For further information and a complete description of all of the terms of the Consent Order, please refer to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 29, 2014.

~~Supervisory Agreement~~

~~Department of Justice Settlement Agreement~~

On February 24, 2012, the Bank entered into a Settlement Agreement with the Department of Justice ("DOJ") under which we made an initial payment of $15 million and agreed to make future payments totaling $118 million in annual increments of up to $25 million upon meeting all of the following conditions which are evaluated quarterly and include: (a) the reversal of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which occurred at the end of 2013; (b) the repayment of the Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series C (the "TARP Preferred") (or, in the absence of a redemption, adjusting our Bank Tier 1 Capital Ratio for any unextinguished TARP Preferred); and (c) our Bank’s Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio is 11 percent or more. Additionally, if the Bank or Bancorp become party to a business combination in which the Bank or Bancorp represent less than 33.3 percent of the resulting company’s assets, annual payments would commence twelve months after the date of that business combination. Further, should all conditions for payment be satisfied, an annual payment under the settlement agreement would be made, and any further payments would be made only so long as such conditions are satisfied at the time required for such further payments.

In July 2016, we paid a $200 million dividend from the Bank to the Bancorp and issued $250 million in Senior Notes to a) bring current the interest payments on our trust preferred securities, b) become current on our deferred interest and dividends related to our TARP Preferred and c) repay our TARP Preferred. To support the on-going debt service and other Bancorp expenses, we also intend to reduce our Bancorp double leverage and debt to equity ratios to be more consistent with such ratios at other mid-sized banks, which would likely require further dividend payments from the Bank to the Bancorp for the foreseeable future.

Future annual payments of $25 million or the final payment of the remaining balance under the Settlement Agreement could be required if the Tier 1 Leverage Ratio of the Bank meets or exceeds 11 percent after adjusting for any outstanding TARP Preferred. Following the TARP Preferred redemption, which included a $200 million dividend from the Bank to Bancorp, the Bank’s Tier 1 Leverage Ratio is less than 11 percent. The combination of (a) future dividends from the Bank to Bancorp and (b) continued growth in earning assets at the Bank are expected to continue to limit the growth rate of the Bank’s Tier 1 Leverage Ratio, which could have an impact on the timing of expected cash flows under the Settlement Agreement.

~~Regulatory Capital Composition - Transition~~

capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of our assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Our capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators about components, risk weightings, and other factors. We are currently subject to regulatory capital rules issued by U.S. banking regulators

Effective January 1, 2015, we became subject to the Basel III rules, which include certain transition provisions. Capital deductions related to the Company's MSRs and deferred tax assets are recognized in 20 percent annual increments, and will be fully recognized as of January 1, 2018. When presented on a fully phased-in basis, capital, risk-weighted assets, and the capital ratios assume all regulatory capital adjustments and deductions are fully recognized. As of September 30, 2016, the Company and the Bank were subject to the transitional phase-in limitation on deductions related to MSRs and certain deferred tax assets. The annual incremental change in the deductions due to the increase in the transitional phase-in from 40 percent in 2015 to 60 percent in 2016 reduced our regulatory capital ratios.

Effective January 1, 2016, we became subject to the capital conservation buffer under the Basel III rules, subjecting a banking organization to certain limitations on capital distributions and discretionary bonus payments to executive officers if the organization does not maintain a capital conservation buffer above the minimum risk based capital requirements. The capital conservation buffer for 2016 must be greater than 0.625 percent in order to not be subject to limitations. The Company and the Bank had a capital conservation buffer of 7.3 percent and 9.9 percent, respectively as of September 30, 2016. When fully phased-in on January 1, 2019, the capital conservation buffer must be greater than 2.5 percent and will effectively increase the minimum common equity Tier 1 capital ratio to 7.0 percent, the minimum Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio to 8.5 percent and the minimum total risk-based capital ratio to 10.5 percent.

The new regulations grandfather the regulatory capital treatment of hybrid debt and equity securities, such as trust preferred securities issued prior to May 19, 2010, for banks or holding companies with less than $15.0 billion in total consolidated assets as of December 31, 2009.

~~At September 30, 2016, we were considered "well-capitalized" for regulatory purposes. The following tables show the regulatory capital ratios as of the dates indicated:~~

Bancorp September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
(Dollars in millions)
Tier 1 leverage (to adjusted tangible assets) $ 1,225
8.88 % $ 1,435
11.51 %
Total adjusted tangible asset base (1)
13,798
12,474

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 1,225
13.98 % $ 1,435
18.98 %
Common equity Tier 1 (to RWA)
1,056
12.04 % 1,065
14.09 %
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets) 1,338
15.26 % 1,534
20.28 %
Risk-weighted asset base (1)
$ 8,767
$ 7,561

Bank September 30, 2016 December 31, 2015
Amount Ratio Amount Ratio
(Dollars in millions)
Tier 1 leverage (to adjusted tangible assets) $ 1,459
10.55 % $ 1,472
11.79 %
Total adjusted tangible asset base (1)
13,824
12,491

Tier 1 capital (to risk-weighted assets) $ 1,459
16.59 % $ 1,472
19.42 %
Common equity Tier 1 (to RWA)
1,459
16.59 % 1,472
19.42 %
Total risk-based capital (to risk-weighted assets) 1,571
17.87 % 1,570
20.71 %
Risk-weighted asset base (1)
$ 8,794
$ 7,582

the De-recognition of Non-financial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset De-recognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Non-financial Assets		January 1, 2018
~~(1)~~ASU 2017-04	~~Based on adjusted total assets~~	Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for ~~purposes~~Goodwill Impairment	January 1, 2020
ASU 2017-01		Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of ~~Tier~~a Business	January 1, ~~leverage capital~~2018
ASU 2016-18		Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash	January 1, 2018
ASU 2016-16		Income Taxes (Topic 740): Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory	January 1, 2018
ASU 2016-15		Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and ~~risk-weighted assets~~Cash Payments	January 1, 2018
ASU 2016-04		Liabilities - Extinguishment of Liabilities (Subtopic 504-20): Recognition of Breakage for ~~purposes Tier1, common equity Tier~~Certain Prepaid Stored-Value Products	January 1, 2018
ASU 2016-01		Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and ~~total risk-based capital.~~Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities	January 1, 2018

Our Tier 1 leverage ratio for the Corporation and the Bank decreased at September 30, 2016, compared to December 31, 2015, primarily as a result of transactions related to the payoff of TARP, the payment of TARP dividends in arrears, along with an increase in the deductions related to DTAs and MSRs due to the change in the transitional phase-in limitation from 40 percent at December 31, 2015 to 60 percent at September 30, 2016.

Banks with assets greater than $10 billion are required to submit a Dodd-Frank stress test ("DFAST") under the final rules established by their primary regulator. DFAST requires banks to project results over a nine-quarter planning horizon under three scenarios (baseline, adverse, and severely adverse) published by the Federal Reserve and to show that the bank would exceed regulatory minimum capital standards for the Tier 1 leverage ratio, Tier 1 common ratio, Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio, and the Total risk-based capital ratio under all of these scenarios. We are not subject to the Federal Reserve’s Comprehensive Capital Analysis and Review ("CCAR") program.

~~Certain regulatory capital ratios for the Bank and the Company as of September 30, 2016 are shown in the following table:~~

September 30, 2016 Regulatory Minimums Regulatory Minimums to be Well-Capitalized Bank Bancorp

Basel III Ratios (transitional)
Common equity Tier I capital ratio 4.50 % 6.50 % 16.59 % 12.04 %
Tier I leverage ratio 4.00 % 5.00 % 10.55 % 8.88 %

Basel III Ratios (fully phased-in) (1)

Common equity Tier I capital ratio 4.50 % 6.50 % 15.01 % 9.47 %
Tier I leverage ratio 4.00 % 5.00 % 9.84 % 7.87 %


~~(1)~~	~~See "Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures."~~

The impact to our Tier 1 leverage ratio is mostly driven by the treatment that mortgage servicing rights receive under Basel III. Over the long term, we plan to continue to reduce our mortgage servicing rights to Tier 1 ratio, taking into consideration market conditions to guide our pace of MSR reduction. At September 30, 2016, we had $302 million of mortgage servicing rights, representing 24.6 percent of Tier 1 capital. We will continue to look for opportunities to reduce our mortgage servicing rights exposure over time.

~~Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures~~

~~Basel III (transitional) to Basel III (fully phased-in) reconciliation.~~ On January 1, 2015, the Basel III rules became effective, subject to transition provisions primarily related to regulatory deductions and adjustments impacting common equity Tier 1 capital and Tier 1 capital. When fully phased-in, Basel III, will increase capital requirements through higher minimum capital levels as well as through increases in risk-weights for certain exposures. Additionally, the final Basel III rules place greater emphasis on common equity. In October 2013, the OCC and Federal Reserve released final rules detailing the U.S. implementation of Basel III and the application of the risk-based and leverage capital rules to top-tier savings and loan holding companies. We have transitioned to the Basel III framework beginning in January 2015 and are subject to a phase-in period extending through 2018. Accordingly, the calculations provided below are estimates. These measures are considered to be non-GAAP financial measures because they are not formally defined by GAAP and the Basel III implementation regulations. The Common Equity Tier 1, Tier 1, Total Capital and Leverage ratios will not be fully phased-in until January 1, 2018 and the Capital Conservation buffer will not be fully phased-in until January 1, 2019. The regulations are subject to change as

clarifying guidance becomes available and the calculations currently include our interpretations of the requirements including informal feedback received through the regulatory process. Other entities may calculate the Basel III ratios differently from ours based on their interpretation of the guidelines. Since analysts and banking regulators may assess our capital adequacy using the Basel III framework, we believe that it is useful to provide investors information enabling them to assess our capital adequacy on the same basis.

September 30, 2016 Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Tier 1 Leverage (to Adjusted Tangible Assets) (1)
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets Total Risk-Based Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Flagstar Bancorp
(Dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Regulatory capital – Basel III (transitional) to Basel III (fully phased-in)
Basel III (transitional) $ 1,056
$ 1,225
$ 1,225
$ 1,338
Increased deductions related to deferred tax assets, mortgage servicing rights, and other capital components (222 ) (151 ) (151 ) (150 )
Basel III (fully phased-in) capital $ 834
$ 1,074
$ 1,074
$ 1,188
Risk-weighted assets – Basel III (transitional) to Basel III (fully phased-in)
Basel III assets (transitional) $ 8,767
$ 13,798
$ 8,767
$ 8,767
Net change in assets 36
(152 ) 36
36
Basel III (fully phased-in) assets $ 8,803
$ 13,646
$ 8,803
$ 8,803
Capital ratios
Basel III (transitional) 12.04 % 8.88 % 13.98 % 15.26 %
Basel III (fully phased-in) 9.47 % 7.87 % 12.20 % 13.49 %

September 30, 2016 Common Equity Tier 1 (to Risk Weighted Assets)
Tier 1 Leverage (to Adjusted Tangible Assets) (1)
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets Total Risk-Based Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets)
Flagstar Bank
(Dollars in millions)
(unaudited)
Regulatory capital – Basel III (transitional) to Basel III (fully phased-in)
Basel III (transitional) $ 1,459
$ 1,459
$ 1,459
$ 1,571
Increased deductions related to deferred tax assets, mortgage servicing rights, and other capital components (110 ) (110 ) (110 ) (107 )
Basel III (fully phased-in) capital $ 1,349
$ 1,349
$ 1,349
$ 1,464
Risk-weighted assets – Basel III (transitional) to Basel III (fully phased-in)
Basel III assets (transitional) $ 8,794
$ 13,824
$ 8,794
$ 8,794
Net change in assets 195
(110 ) 195
195
Basel III (fully phased-in) assets $ 8,989
$ 13,714
$ 8,989
$ 8,989
Capital ratios
Basel III (transitional) 16.59 % 10.55 % 16.59 % 17.87 %
Basel III (fully phased-in) 15.01 % 9.84 % 15.01 % 16.29 %

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

A discussion regarding our management of market risk is included in "Market Risk" in this report in "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

(a)

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended ("Exchange Act"), an evaluation was performed by the Company’s management, including our principal executive and financial officers, regarding the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the principal executive and financial officers have concluded that our current disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Commission's rules and forms as of ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017.


(b)	Changes in Internal Controls. There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(d) of the Exchange Act) during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company is party to legal proceedings incidental to its business. ~~See "Legal proceedings" under~~For further information, see Note 16 ~~of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1 Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.~~- Legal Proceedings, Contingencies and Commitments.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The Company believes that there have been no material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in response to Item 1A to Part I of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Sale of Unregistered Securities

The Company made no sales of unregistered securities during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company made no purchases of its equity securities during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2016.~~March 31, 2017.

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

The Company had no defaults on senior securities.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None.

Item 5. Other Information


~~(a)~~	~~None.~~

None.

Item 6. Exhibits



Exhibit No.		Description

3.1		Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 16, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2		Sixth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-Q, dated November 7, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).

11		Statement regarding computation of per share earnings is incorporated by reference to Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements.

31.1		Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.1		Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Executive Officer

32.2		Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Financial Officer

101		Financial statements from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.




		FLAGSTAR BANCORP, INC.
		Registrant

Date:	~~November 7, 2016~~May 8, 2017	/s/ Alessandro DiNello
		Alessandro DiNello
		President and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

		/s/ James K. Ciroli
		James K. Ciroli
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX



Exhibit No.		Description

3.1		Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Flagstar Bancorp, Inc. (previously filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K, dated March 16, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2		Sixth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company (previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-Q, dated November 7, 2016, and incorporated herein by reference).

11		Statement regarding computation of per share earnings is incorporated by reference to Note 13 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in Item 1. Financial Statements.

31.1		Section 302 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2		Section 302 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

32.1		Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Executive Officer

32.2		Section 906 Certification, as furnished by the Chief Financial Officer

101		Financial statements from Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2016,~~March 31, 2017, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.

9477



Commercial Credit Loans	Commercial Real Estate		Commercial and Industrial		Warehouse		Total Commercial
September 30, 2016	(Dollars in millions)
Grade
Pass	$	1,122	$	654	$	1,659	$	3,435
Watch	37		20		86		143
Special mention	3		33		50		86
Substandard	6		1		—		7
Total loans	$	1,168	$	708	$	1,795	$	3,671

December 31, 2015
Grade
Pass	$	766	$	492	$	1,181	$	2,439
Watch	42		30		155		227
Special mention	2		21		—		23
Substandard	4		9		—		13
Total loans	$	814	$	552	$	1,336	$	2,702



Consumer Credit Loans	Residential First Mortgage		Second Mortgage		HELOC		Other Consumer		Total
September 30, 2016	(Dollars in millions)
Grade
Pass	$	2,081	$	90	$	305	$	29	$	2,505
Watch	24		33		14		1		72
Substandard	31		4		7		—		42
Total loans	$	2,136	$	127	$	326	$	30	$	2,619

December 31, 2015
Grade
Pass	$	2,993	$	101	$	353	$	31	$	3,478
Watch	49		32		22		—		103
Substandard	58		2		9		—		69
Total loans	$	3,100	$	135	$	384	$	31	$	3,650



	September 30, 2016			December 31, 2015			September 30, 2015
Book value per common share	$	22.72		$	22.33		$	21.91
Number of common shares outstanding	56,597,271			56,483,258			56,436,026
Mortgage loans serviced for others	$	31,372		$	26,145		$	26,306
Mortgage loans subserviced for others	$	38,801		$	40,244		$	42,282
Weighted average service fee (basis points)	28.1			27.7			28.3
Capitalized value of mortgage servicing rights	0.96		%	1.13		%	1.12		%
Mortgage servicing rights to Tier 1 capital	24.60		%	20.63		%	21.10		%
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to LHFI (2)	2.30		%	3.00		%	3.66		%
Ratio of allowance for loan losses to LHFI and loans with government guarantees (2)	2.16		%	2.78		%	3.34		%
Ratio of nonperforming assets to total assets	0.39		%	0.61		%	0.64		%
Equity-to-assets ratio	9.01		%	11.14		%	12.01		%
Common equity-to-assets ratio	9.01		%	9.20		%	9.88		%
Tier 1 leverage ratio (to adjusted total assets)	8.88		%	11.51		%	11.65		%
Common equity Tier 1 capital ratio (to risk-weighted assets)	12.04		%	14.09		%	14.93		%
Total risk-based capital ratio (to risk-weighted assets)	15.26		%	20.28		%	21.64		%
Number of bank branches	99			99			99
Number of FTE employees	2,881			2,713			2,677



	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2016 Versus 2015 Increase (Decrease) Due to:
	Rate			Volume			Total
	(Dollars in millions)
Interest-Earning Assets
Loans held-for-sale	$	(4	)	$	12		$	8
Loans held-for-investment
Consumer loans (1)	(1		)	(6		)	(7		)
Commercial loans (2)	2			11			13
Total loans held-for-investment	1			5			6
Loans with government guarantees	—			(1		)	(1		)
Investment securities	(4		)	6			2
Total other interest-earning assets	$	(7	)	$	22		$	15
Interest-Bearing Liabilities
Retail deposits
Certificates of deposit	$	—		$	1		$	1
Total deposits	—			1			1
Short-term debt	(15		)	16			1
Long-term debt	3			(1		)	2
Other debt	3			1			4
Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	(9	)	$	17		$	8
Change in net interest income	$	2		$	5		$	7



	Three Months Ended
	September 30, 2016		June 30, 2016		March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015		September 30, 2015
	(Dollars in millions)
Correspondent	$	6,994	$	6,200	$	4,761	$	4,115	$	5,584
Broker	1,555		1,625		1,270		1,406		1,930
Retail	643		496		312		294		353
Total	$	9,192	$	8,321	$	6,343	$	5,815	$	7,867

Purchase originations	$	3,898	$	3,837	$	2,688	$	2,875	$	4,357
Refinance originations	5,294		4,484		3,655		2,940		3,510
Total	$	9,192	$	8,321	$	6,343	$	5,815	$	7,867

Conventional	$	5,062	$	4,763	$	3,799	$	3,351	$	4,452
Government	2,328		2,060		1,525		1,416		1,908
Jumbo	1,802		1,498		1,019		1,048		1,507
Total	$	9,192	$	8,321	$	6,343	$	5,815	$	7,867



	1^st Quarter		2^nd Quarter		3^rd Quarter		4^th Quarter
	(Dollars in millions)
2016 (1)	N/A		N/A		N/A		$	105
2017	$	113	$	118	$	121	114
2018	115		122		124		116
Later years (2)	347		575		863		850



Commercial Loans Held-for-Investment
	September 30, 2016					December 31, 2015
	Balance			Average Note Rate		Balance			Average Note Rate
	(Dollars in millions)
Commercial real estate loans:
Fixed rate	$	55		4.8	%	$	52		4.9	%
Adjustable rate	1,118			3.2	%	769			2.8	%
Total commercial real estate loans (1)	1,173					821
Net deferred fees and other	(5		)			(7		)
Total commercial real estate loans, net	$	1,168				$	814
Commercial and industrial loans:
Fixed rate	$	86		4.2	%	$	44		4.7	%
Adjustable rate	629			3.8	%	512			3.0	%
Total commercial and industrial loans	715					556
Net deferred fees and other	(7		)			(4		)
Total commercial and industrial loans, net	$	708				$	552
Warehouse loans:
Adjustable rate	$	1,835		3.4	%	$	1,367		3.4	%
Net deferred fees and other	(41		)			(31		)
Total warehouse loans, net	$	1,794				$	1,336
Total commercial loans:
Fixed rate	$	141		4.4	%	$	96		4.8	%
Adjustable rate	3,582			3.4	%	2,648			3.1	%
Total commercial loans	3,723					2,744
Net deferred fees and other	(53		)			(42		)
Total commercial loans, net	$	3,670				$	2,702



Days Past Due	September 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
	(Dollars in millions)
30 – 59 days
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	$	4	$	7
HELOC	1		2
Other	1		1
Total 30-59 days past due	6		10
60 – 89 days
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	1		3
HELOC	—		1
Other	1		—
Total 60-89 days past due	2		4
90 days or greater
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	29		53
Second mortgage	4		2
HELOC	7		9
Commercial loans
Commercial and industrial	—		2
Total 90 days or greater past due (1)	40		66
Total past due loans	$	48	$	80



	September 30, 2016
	Loans Held-for-Investment			Nonaccrual Loans		As a % of Loan Specified Portfolio		As a % of Nonaccrual Loans
	(Dollars in millions)
Consumer loans
Residential first mortgage	$	2,136		$	29	1.4	%	72.5	%
Second mortgage	127			4		3.1	%	10.0	%
HELOC	326			7		2.1	%	17.5	%
Other consumer	30			—		—	%	—	%
Total consumer loans	2,619			40		1.5	%	100.0	%
Commercial loans
Commercial real estate	1,168			—		—	%	—	%
Commercial and industrial	708			—		—	%	—	%
Warehouse lending	1,795			—		—	%	—	%
Total commercial loans	3,671			—		—	%	—	%
Total loans (1)	$	6,290		$	40	0.6	%	100.0	%
Less allowance for loan losses	(143		)
Total loans held-for-investment, net	$	6,147



	TDRs Held-for-Investment
	Performing		Nonperforming		Total
	(Dollars in millions)
September 30, 2016
Consumer loans (1)	$	70	$	17	$	87
Commercial loans (2)	1		—		1
Total TDRs	$	71	$	17	$	88
December 31, 2015
Consumer loans (1)	$	101	$	35	$	136
Total TDRs	$	101	$	35	$	136