UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H (1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with the reduced disclosure format.

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED MARCH 31, 2003

OR

Commission file number: 333-100029

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
OF
NEW YORK
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:516/451-5300631/357-8920

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o    No ý

        As of April 30,October 31, 2003, the Registrantregistrant had 100,000 common shares, $25 par value, outstanding, all of which are held by Allstate Life Insurance Company.

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
March 31,September 30, 2003

2

PART 1.I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ItemITEM 1. Financial StatementsFINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

See notes to condensed financial statements.

31

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF FINANCIAL POSITION

See notes to condensed financial statements.

42

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

See notes to condensed financial statements.

53

ALLSTATE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK
NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)(Unaudited)

1.     Basis of Presentation

        The accompanying condensed financial statements include the accounts of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York (the "Company"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of Allstate Life Insurance Company ("ALIC"), which is wholly-owned by Allstate Insurance Company ("AIC"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of The Allstate Corporation (the "Corporation").

        The condensed financial statements and notes as of March 31,September 30, 2003, and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2003 and 2002 are unaudited. The condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. TheThese condensed financial statements and notes should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002. The results of operations for the interim periods should not be considered indicative of results to be expected for the full year.

        To conform to the 2003 and year-end 2002 presentations, certain amounts in the prior year's condensed financial statements have been reclassified.

        Non-cash investment exchanges and modifications, which primarily reflect refinancings of fixed income securities, totaled $5 thousandmillion for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2002. There were no non-cash investment exchanges and modifications for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2003.

Adopted accounting standard

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities"

        In November 2002,April 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued FASB Interpretation No. 45 ("FIN 45"), "Guarantor's Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others." FIN 45 requires that upon issuance of a guarantee or modification of a previously issued guarantee, the guarantor must recognize a liability for the fair value of the obligation it assumes under that guarantee. The provisions for initial recognition and measurement are effective on a prospective basis for guarantees that are issued or modified after December 31, 2002. The adoption of FIN 45 did not have a material impact on either the financial position or results of operations of the Company.

Pending accounting standard

        In April 2003, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting StandardsStandard ("SFAS") No. 149, "Amendment of Statement 133 on Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". The statement amends, clarifies and clarifiescodifies financial accounting and reporting for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and utilized for hedging activities under SFAS No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities". While this statement applies primarily to certain derivative contracts and embedded derivatives entered into or modified after June 30, 2003, it also codifies conclusions previously reached by the FASB at various dates on certain implementation issues. The Company is currently inimpact of adopting the process of evaluating the impactprovisions of this statement onwere not material to the Company's Condensed Statements of Operations andor Financial Position.

Exposure draftsPending accounting standards

Statement of Position 03-01

        OnIn July 31, 2002,2003, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants issued an exposure draft Statement of Position ("SOP") 03-01 entitled "Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for Certain Nontraditional Long-Duration Contracts and for Separate Accounts".Accounts." The accounting guidance contained in the proposed SOP applies to severaladdresses three areas: separate accounts presentation and valuation, accounting for sales inducements such as bonus interest, and the classification and valuation of the Company's products and product features.certain long duration liabilities. The proposed effective date of the SOP is for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2003, with earlier adoption encouraged. If adopted early, the provisions

        Based on management's review of the SOP, must be applied as of the beginning ofmost significant impact to the fiscal year. Accordingly, ifCompany is the SOP were adopted during an interim period of 2003, prior interim periods would be restated. A provision of the proposed SOP that requires the establishment of a liability in addition to the account balance for contracts and contract features that provide guaranteed death or other insurance benefits. The final SOP may also require a liability forbenefits and guaranteed income benefits. These liabilities areThis liability will be determined based on models that involve numerous estimates and subjective judgments, including those regarding expected market rates of return and volatility, contract surrender rates and mortality experience. The Company does not currently recognized byrecognize these liabilities. The Company is currently evaluating the provisions of the statement. The Company and their establishmentplans to adopt the provisions of the statement no later than January 1, 2004. The effect of adoption may have a material impact on the Condensed Statements of OperationsOperations. However, the amounts may vary based on market

64

depending on the market conditions at the time of adoption, butconditions. Adoption is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Condensed Statements of Financial Position.

Proposed standard

Emerging Issues Task Force Topic No. 03-01

        The Emerging Issues Task Force ("EITF") issueddiscussed Topic No. 03-01, "The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments", which attempts to define other-than-temporary impairment and highlight its application to investment securities accounted for under either the cost or equity method underboth SFAS No. 115, "Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities". and Accounting Principles Board ("APB") Opinion No. 18, "The Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stocks." The current issue summary, which has yet to be finalized, proposes that if, at the evaluation date, the fair value of an investment security is less than its carrying value then an impairment exists for which a determination must be made as to whether that impairment is other-than-temporary. The impairment would likely be considered other-than-temporary if the investment's carrying value exceeds its fair value for a period exceeding one year or more. If it is determined that an impairment is other-than-temporary, then an impairment loss should be recognized equal to the difference between the investment's carrying value and its fair value at the reporting date. TheIn recent deliberations, the EITF discussed different models to assess whether impairment is other-than-temporary for different types of investments (e.g. SFAS 115 marketable equity securities, SFAS 115 debt securities, and equity and cost method investments subject to APB Opinion No. 18). Due to the uncertainty of the final model or models that may be adopted, the estimated impact to the Company's Condensed Statements of Operations and Financial Position is presently not determinable until such time as a final consensus is reached.determinable.

2.     Reinsurance

        The Company purchases reinsurance to limit aggregate and single losses on large risks. The Company follows a comprehensive evaluation process involving credit scoring and capacity to select reinsurers. The Company continues to have primary liability as the direct insurer for risks reinsured. Estimating amounts of reinsurance recoverable is impacted by the uncertainties involved in the establishment of loss reserves. Failure of reinsurers to honor their obligations could result in losses to the Company. The Company cedes a portion of the mortality risk on certain term life policies with a pool of non-affiliated reinsurers. Additionally, the Company has a reinsurance agreement through which it primarily cedes re-investment related risk on its structured settlement annuities to ALIC. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company pays a premium to ALIC that varies with the aggregate structured settlement annuity reserve balance. In return, ALIC guarantees that the yield on the portion of the Company's investment portfolio that supports structured settlement annuity liabilities will not fall below contractually determined rates.

        Amounts recoverable from reinsurers are estimated based upon assumptions consistent with those used in establishing the liabilities related to the underlying reinsured contracts. No single reinsurer had a material obligation to the Company nor is the Company's business substantially dependent upon any reinsurance contract. The effects of reinsurance on premiums and contract charges are as follows:

75

        The effects of reinsurance on contract benefits are as follows:

        Excluded from the table above are premiums ceded to ALIC of $634$647 thousand, $602 thousand, $1.9 million and $576 thousand$1.8 million for the three monthsand nine month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively, under the terms of the structured settlement annuity reinsurance agreement.agreement described above. These premiums are recorded as investment expense and reflected in Net investment income.income in the Condensed Statements of Operations.

3.     Regulation, Legal Proceedings and Guarantees

Regulation

        The Company is subject to changing social, economic and regulatory conditions. State and federal regulatory initiatives and proceedings have varied and have included efforts to remove barriers preventing banks from engaging in the securities and insurance businesses, to change tax laws affecting the taxation of insurance companies and the tax treatment of either insurance products whichor competing non-insurance products that may impact the relative desirability of various personal investment products and to expand overall regulation. The ultimate changes and eventual effects, if any, of these initiatives are uncertain.

Legal proceedings

        TheLegal proceedings involving Allstate agencies and AIC may impact the Company, even when the Company is not directly involved because the Company sells its products through a variety of distribution channels including Allstate agencies. Consequently, information about the outcomemore significant of some legalthese proceedings that involve AIC regarding the Allstate agencies may have an impact on the Company.is provided below.

        AIC is defending various lawsuits involving worker classification issues. Examples of theseThese lawsuits include a number of putative class actions and one certified class action challenging the overtime exemption claimed by AIC under the Fair Labor Standards Act or state wage and hour laws. These class actions mirror similar lawsuits filed recently against other carriers in the industry and other employers. Another examplelawsuit involves the worker classification of staff working in agencies. In this putative class action, plaintiffs seek damages under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act ("ERISA") and the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act alleging that agency secretaries were terminated as employees by AIC and rehired by agencies thoughthrough outside staffing vendors for the purpose of avoiding the payment of employee benefits. A putative nationwide class action filed by former employee agents also includes a worker classification issue; these agents are challenging certain amendments to the Agents Pension Plan and are seeking to have exclusive agent independent contractors treated as employees for benefit purposes. AIC has been vigorously defending these and various other worker classification lawsuits. The outcome of these disputes is currently uncertain.

        AIC is also defending certain matters relating to its agency program reorganization announced in 1999. These matters include an investigation by the U.S. Department of Labor and a lawsuit filed in December 2001 by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ("EEOC") with respect to allegations of retaliation under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, the Americans with Disabilities Act and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. A putative nationwide class action has also been filed by

6

former employee agents alleging various violations of ERISA, breach of contract and age discrimination. AIC has been vigorously defending these lawsuits and other matters related to its agency program reorganization. In addition, AIC is defending certain matters relating to its life agency program reorganization announced in 2000. These matters

8

include an investigation by the EEOC with respect to allegations of age discrimination and retaliation. AIC is cooperating fully with the agency investigation and will continue to vigorously defend these and other claims related to the life agency program reorganization. The outcome of these disputes is currently uncertain.

        Various other legal and regulatory actions are currently pending that involve the Company and specific aspects of its conduct of business. Like other members of the insurance industry, the Company is the potential target of an increasing number of class action lawsuits and other types of litigation, some of which involve claims for substantial and/or indeterminate amounts (including punitive and treble damages) and the outcomes of which are unpredictable. This litigation is based on a variety of issues including insurance and claim settlement practices. However, at this time, based on their present status, it is the opinion of management that the ultimate liability, if any, in one or more of these other actions in excess of amounts currently reserved is not expected to have a material effect on the results of operations, liquidity or financial position of the Company.

Guarantees

        In the normal course of business, the Company provides standard indemnifications to counterparties in contracts in connection with numerous transactions, including indemnifications for breaches of representations and warranties, taxes and certain other liabilities, such as third party lawsuits. The indemnification clauses are often standard contractual terms and were entered into in the normal course of business based on an assessment that the risk of loss would be remote. The terms of the indemnifications vary in duration and nature. In many cases, the maximum obligation is not explicitly stated and the contingencies triggering the obligation to indemnify have not occurred and are not expected to occur. Because the obligated amounts of the indemnifications are not explicitly stated in many cases, the maximum amount of the obligation under such indemnifications is not determinable. Historically, the Company has not made any material payments pursuant to these obligations.

        In addition, the Company indemnifies its directors, officers non-officer employees and other individuals serving at the request of the Company as a director or officer to the extent provided in its charter and by-laws. Since these indemnifications are generally not subject to limitation with respect to duration or amount, the Company does not believe that it is possible to determine the maximum potential amount due under these indemnifications.

        The aggregate liability balance related to all guarantees was not material as of March 31,September 30, 2003.

97

4.     Other Comprehensive Income

        The components of other comprehensive income on a pretax and after-tax basis for the three months ended March 31, are as follows:

105.     Disposition of operations

        During the third quarter of 2003, the Company announced its intention to exit the Direct Response distribution business. Based on its decision to sell the business, the Company has recorded an estimated loss on the disposition of $4.3 million ($2.7 million, after-tax).

8

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS' REVIEW REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of
Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York:

        We have reviewed the accompanying condensed statement of financial position of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York (the "Company", an affiliate of The Allstate Corporation) as of March 31,September 30, 2003, and the related condensed statements of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 and the condensed statements of cash flows for the three-monthnine-month periods ended March 31,September 30, 2003 and 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.

        We conducted our reviewreviews in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

        Based on our review,reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

        We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the statement of financial position of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York as of December 31, 2002, and the related statements of operations and comprehensive income, shareholder's equity, and cash flows for the year then ended, not presented herein. In our report dated February 5, 2003, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed statement of financial position as of December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated statement of financial position from which it has been derived.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Chicago, Illinois
MayNovember 13, 2003

119

Item 2.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHTHREE-MONTH AND NINE-MONTH PERIODS ENDED MARCH 31,SEPTEMBER 30, 2003 AND 2002

The following discussion highlights significant factors influencing results of operations and changes in financial position of Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York (the "Company"). It should be read in conjunction with the condensed financial statements and related notes thereto found under Part I. Item 1. contained herein, and with the discussion, analysis, financial statements and notes thereto in Part I. Item 1. and Part II. Item 7. and Item 8. of the Allstate Life Insurance Company of New York Annual Report on Form 10-K for 2002. To conform to the 2003 and year-end 2002 presentation, certain prior year amounts have been reclassified.

Management has identified the Company as a single segment entity.

The following discussion uses some "non-GAAP" measures that are not based on generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). These non-GAAP measures are listed and reconciled to the most directly comparable GAAP measures near the end of this Item 2 under the heading "Non-GAAP and Operating Measures."

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        Summarized financial data and key operating measures as of and for the three months ended March 31, areis presented in the following table.

(1)

Realized capital gains and losses are reconciled in the following table:table on page 16.

REVENUES

        Total revenues increased 23.4% in the third quarter of 2003 compared to the third quarter of 2002, due to higher Net investment income and lower net realized capital losses. Total revenues rose 4.3% in the first nine months of 2003 compared to the first nine months of 2002. The increase was due to higher Net investment income, increased Contract charges and lower net realized capital losses partially offset by decreased Premiums and contract charges,from immediate annuities with life contingencies.

10

OPERATIONS

Premiums included in the Condensed Statements of Operations, represent GAAP premiums generated from traditional life, and other insurance products and immediate annuities with life contingencies, whichand other insurance products that have significant mortality or morbidity risk.

Contract charges are generated from interest-sensitive life products, variable annuities, fixed annuities and other investment products for which deposits are classified as contractholderContractholder funds or Separate Accounts liabilities. Contract charges are assessed against thethese contractholder account balancevalues for maintenance, administration, cost of insurance and surrender prior to the contractually specified dates. As a result, changes in Contractholder funds and Separate Accounts are considered in the evaluation of growth and as indicators of future levels of revenues.

12        The following table summarizes premiums and contract charges by product.

11

        The following table summarizes GAAP premiumsPremiums and contract charges.charges by distribution channel.

        Total GAAP premiums decreased 29.4%Premiums increased 5.2% to $16.3$14.2 million in the firstthird quarter of 2003 from $23.1$13.5 million in the firstthird quarter of 2002. This decrease was2002, due to decreased premiums onan increase in sales of immediate annuities with life contingencies. Consumer preferencesSales of immediate annuities with life contingencies fluctuate due to consumer preference as well as market and marketcompetitive conditions, which drive the level and mix of immediate annuities sold with or without life contingencies.

        Total Contract charges were $12.7 million in the third quarter of 2003 compared to $12.9 million in the third quarter of 2002. Higher fixed annuity contract charges were more than offset by a decline in variable annuities and interest-sensitive life insurance contract charges. The variable annuity daily average account values during the third quarter of 2003 were lower than the daily average account values during the third quarter of 2002, as poor equity market performance during the prior year and surrenders offset increases from new business and market appreciation since March of 2003.

        For the first nine months of 2003, Premiums and Contract charges decreased 20.1% compared to the first nine months of 2002. The decrease is due to decreased sales of immediate annuities with life contingencies resulting in volatility in reported revenues. Premiums from competitive market conditions and lower variable annuity contract charges from lower average account values, partially offset by slightly higher traditional life products increased 6.7%insurance premiums, and higher contract charges related to interest-sensitive life insurance and fixed annuities.

        Contractholder funds, included in the Condensed Statements of Financial Position represent interest-bearing liabilities arising from the sale of interest-sensitive life and fixed annuities. The balance of the Contractholder funds is equal to the cumulative deposits received and interest credited to the contractholder less cumulative contract maturities, surrenders, withdrawals and contract charges for mortality or administrative expenses.

12

        The following table shows the changes in Contractholder funds.

(1)

The fixed portion of variable annuity deposits are included in Fixed annuities.

        The increase in Contractholder funds of $138.4 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2003 as acompared to the $260.1 million increase during the same period in 2002 is the result of growthfixed annuity deposits in both periods partially offset by a decrease in new deposits to the fixed portion of variable annuities. Deposits for the fixed portion of variable annuities included in Contractholder funds decreased $107.9 million in the number of policies inforce from new business.

        Total contract charges increased 5.1% due to a 6.7% increase in contract charges on interest-sensitive life in the firstthird quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002.

        For the first nine months of 2003, the change in Contractholder funds compared to the first nine months of 2002 as a result ofreflects trends consistent with those for the three months ended September 30. Decreased deposits into variable annuity fixed account investment options and slightly higher cost of insurance charges from increased inforce business resulting from new sales. Contract charges earned on annuities remained stable as increased contract charges from fixedsurrenders and immediate annuitiesmaturities were offset by decreasedfixed annuity deposits and increased interest-sensitive life deposits from new business.

        Separate Accounts liabilities, included in the Condensed Statements of Financial Position, are legally segregated from the Company's general account assets and represent the contractholders' claims to the related Separate Accounts assets. Separate Accounts liabilities primarily arise from the sale of variable annuityannuities and variable life insurance. The balance of the Separate Accounts liabilities is equal to the cumulative deposits received plus the investment performance of the related assets less the cumulative contract surrenders, withdrawals, net transfers to/from the general account and cumulative contract charges as a result of surrenders and declines in account balances resulting from poor equity market performance during the prior twelve months, partially offset by new deposits.for mortality or administrative expenses.

13

        The following table summarizes GAAP premiums and contract charges by distribution channel.shows the changes in Separate Accounts.

        Premiums and deposits, an operating measure, by product are presented        Increases in Separate Accounts liabilities in the following table.

        Total Premiumsthird quarter and deposits decreased 0.5% to $190.0 million in the first quarter of 2003 from $191.0 million in the first quarter of 2002. Increased sales of fixed annuities for the quarter were offset by decreased sales of variable annuities due to the poor equity market conditions and decreased sales of immediate annuities as a result of competitive pricing in the New York market. Fixed annuity sales were driven by increased sales through financial institutions and new products such the Allstate® Treasury Linked Annuity.

14

        The following table summarizes Premiums and deposits by distribution channel.

        Premiums and deposits through Allstate agencies decreased 5.4% in the first quarternine months of 2003 compared to the same periods in the prior year were primarily driven by strong equity market performance resulting in improved investment results during both periods and lower transfers into the fixed account investment options and surrenders.

Net investment income increased 13.7% in the third quarter and 14.9% in the first quarternine months of 2002 driven primarily by decreased2003

13

compared to the same periods in the prior year. The increase in both periods was due to higher portfolio balances resulting from increased positive cash flows from product sales of variable annuitiesand deposits, partially offset by increased saleslower portfolio yields. The lower portfolio yields were primarily due to investment purchases of fixed annuities.income securities with interest rates lower than the current portfolio average. Investments as of September 30, 2003, excluding unrealized net capital gains on fixed income securities, increased 19.0% from September 30, 2002.

        OperatingAnalysis of net income a non-GAAP measure, is presented in the following table.

        Operating income decreased 16.7% to $8.5 million for the first quarter of 2003 compared to $10.2 million for the same period in 2002 as a lower mortality margin and increased Amortization of DAC more than offset increases in the investment margin.

Investment margin which represents the excess of investment income earned over interest credited to policyholders and contractholders and interest expense. Investment margin increased 25.1%41.5% in the firstthird quarter of 2003 compared to the same period in 2002. The increase is a result2002 and increased 30.4% in the first nine months of 22.9% higher portfolio balances at March 31, 2003 compared to March 31, 2002, excluding assets invested in Separate Accountsthe first nine months of 2002.    Growth and unrealized net capital gains on fixed income securities. The higher portfolio balance at March 31, 2003 is a result of product sales exceeding contract benefits, maturities, surrenders and withdrawals during the previous 12 months. The impact of the growth of the portfolio was partially offset by a decline in portfolio yields from lower market interest rates affecting the yield on the investment of cash flows from operations. Managementmanagement actions taken to reduce crediting rates on in-force contracts havewhere possible were partially offset by the impact of declining portfoliodecline in yields on the investment margin. However, investment margins on certain life-contingent contracts and other products with guaranteed crediting rates are compressed in a declining interest rate environment. This is due to the level and duration of the guaranteed rates on these products compared to the declining yield on invested assets supporting them. In addition, assets in the Company's portfolio that do not support specific products further compress thecapital, traditional and interest-sensitive life and certain investment margin in a decliningcontracts with fixed interest rate environment as they earn lower investment yields.crediting rates.

15

        The following table summarizes the annualized weighted average investment yield, interest crediting rates and investment spreads for the three months ended March 31.September 30.

14

        The following table summarizes the annualized weighted average investment yield, interest crediting rates and investment spreads for the nine months ended September 30.

        The decline in the weighted average investment spreads for the interest-sensitive life and immediate annuities were due to lower reinvestment yields than the portfolio average in both periods.

        The following table summarizes contractholderContractholder funds and the reserveReserve for life-contingent contract benefits associated with the weighted average investment yield and weighted average interest crediting rates at March 31.September 30.

        The following table summarizes investment margin by product group.