Table of ContentsQuickLinks

-- Click here to rapidly navigate through this document

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)  

ý

 

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008


or

o

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                             to                             

Commission File No. 0-14680

GENZYME CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Massachusetts
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 06-1047163
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

500 Kendall Street
Cambridge, Massachusetts

(Address of principal executive offices)

 

02142

(Zip Code)

(617) 252-7500
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)


        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ý    No o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ý Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
 Smaller reporting company o

        Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o    No ý

        Number of shares of Genzyme Stock outstanding as of JulyOctober 31, 2008: 268,653,485270,519,673


Table of Contents

NOTE REGARDING REFERENCES TO OUR COMMON STOCK

        Throughout this Form 10-Q, the words "we," "us," "our" and "Genzyme" refer to Genzyme Corporation as a whole, and "our board of directors" refers to the board of directors of Genzyme Corporation. We have one outstanding series of common stock, which we refer to as "Genzyme Stock.Stock" or "our common stock."

NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

        This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding:




Table of Contents

        These statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, and our actual results may differ materially from those that are described in this report. These risks and uncertainties include:




Table of Contents

        We have included more detailed descriptions of these and other risks and uncertainties under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Genzyme Corporation and Subsidiaries' Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Risk Factors," in Part I., Item 2. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. We encourage you to read those descriptions carefully. We caution investors not to place substantial reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report. These statements, like all statements in this report, speak only as of the date of this report (unless another date is indicated), and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the statements in light of future developments.

NOTE REGARDING INCORPORATION BY REFERENCE

        The United States Securities and Exchange Commission, commonly referred to as the SEC, allows us to disclose important information to you by referring you to other documents we have filed with them. The information that we refer you to is "incorporated by reference" into this Form 10-Q. Please read that information.

NOTE REGARDING TRADEMARKS

        Genzyme®, Cerezyme®, Ceredase®, Fabrazyme®, Thyrogen®, Myozyme®, Renagel®, Renvela®, Campath®, Clolar®, Evoltra®, Thymoglobulin®, Synvisc®, Sepra®, Seprafilm®, Carticel®, Epicel®, MACI®, Hylaform®, Cholestagel® and Hectorol® are registered trademarks, and Cholestagel™, Mozobil™, Lymphoglobuline™ and Synvisc-One™ are trademarks, of Genzyme or its subsidiaries. WelChol® is a registered trademark of Sankyo Pharma, Inc. Aldurazyme® is a registered trademark of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC. All rights reserved.


Table of Contents


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q, JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 2008

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
  
 PAGE NO. 

PART I.

 

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

  6 

ITEM 1.

 

Financial Statements

  6 

 

Unaudited, Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Three and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 and 2007

  6 

 

Unaudited, Consolidated Balance Sheets as of JuneSeptember 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007

  7 

 

Unaudited, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 and 2007

  8 

 

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements

  9 

ITEM 2.

 

Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

  3031 

ITEM 3.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

  7075 

ITEM 4.

 

Controls and Procedures

  7176 

PART II.

 

OTHER INFORMATION

  71
76
 

ITEM 1.

 

Legal Proceedings

  7176 

ITEM 1A.

 

Risk Factors

  7276 

ITEM 2.

 

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

  7277 

ITEM 4.6.

 

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersExhibits

  7277 

ITEM 6.

ExhibitsSignatures

  73

Signatures

7478 

Table of Contents

PART I.    FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)



 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 


 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Revenues:

Revenues:

 

Revenues:

 

Net product sales

 $1,071,801 $845,482 $2,078,069 $1,643,672 

Net product sales

 $1,058,296 $867,682 $3,136,365 $2,511,354 

Net service sales

 90,622 82,475 176,486 158,356 

Net service sales

 92,586 83,177 269,072 241,533 

Research and development revenue

 8,711 5,462 16,640 14,574 

Research and development revenue

 9,402 9,300 26,042 23,874 
                   
 

Total revenues

 1,171,134 933,419 2,271,195 1,816,602  

Total revenues

 1,160,284 960,159 3,431,479 2,776,761 
                   

Operating costs and expenses:

Operating costs and expenses:

 

Operating costs and expenses:

 

Cost of products sold

 241,343 163,252 458,082 317,976 

Cost of products sold

 225,691 190,475 683,773 508,451 

Cost of services sold

 58,987 54,346 114,561 102,085 

Cost of services sold

 59,517 54,137 174,078 156,222 

Selling, general and administrative

 347,305 339,480 665,691 608,501 

Selling, general and administrative

 331,170 270,306 996,861 878,807 

Research and development

 381,861 198,442 644,658 364,562 

Research and development

 305,242 175,800 949,900 540,362 

Amortization of intangibles

 55,605 49,465 111,263 99,482 

Amortization of intangibles

 55,295 49,819 166,558 149,301 
                   
 

Total operating costs and expenses

 1,085,101 804,985 1,994,255 1,492,606  

Total operating costs and expenses

 976,915 740,537 2,971,170 2,233,143 
                   

Operating income

Operating income

 86,033 128,434 276,940 323,996 

Operating income

 183,369 219,622 460,309 543,618 
                   

Other income (expenses):

Other income (expenses):

 

Other income (expenses):

 

Equity in income of equity method investments

  5,945 188 11,557 

Equity in income (loss) of equity method investments

  (12,648) 188 (1,091)

Minority interest

 563 15 1,026 3,927 

Minority interest

 566 5 1,592 3,932 

Gains on investments in equity securities, net

 9,153 143 9,928 12,931 

Gain (loss) on investments in equity securities, net

 (14,129) 1,105 (4,201) 14,036 

Other

 19 (278) (141) (803)

Other

 (699) 913 (840) 110 

Investment income

 13,352 17,246 28,222 33,465 

Investment income

 11,793 18,222 40,015 51,687 

Interest expense

 (1,149) (3,621) (2,804) (7,809)

Interest expense

 (792) (1,474) (3,596) (9,283)
                   
 

Total other income

 21,938 19,450 36,419 53,268  

Total other income (expenses)

 (3,261) 6,123 33,158 59,391 
                   

Income before income taxes

Income before income taxes

 107,971 147,884 313,359 377,264 

Income before income taxes

 180,108 225,745 493,467 603,009 

Provision for income taxes

Provision for income taxes

 (38,407) (64,090) (98,524) (135,283)

Provision for income taxes

 (60,512) (66,432) (159,036) (201,715)
                   

Net income

Net income

 $69,564 $83,794 $214,835 $241,981 

Net income

 $119,596 $159,313 $334,431 $401,294 
                   

Net income per share:

Net income per share:

 

Net income per share:

 

Basic

 $0.26 $0.32 $0.80 $0.92 

Basic

 $0.44 $0.61 $1.25 $1.52 
                   

Diluted

 $0.25 $0.31 $0.77 $0.88 

Diluted

 $0.42 $0.58 $1.19 $1.45 
                   

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

Basic

 266,904 263,911 267,127 263,693 

Basic

 269,176 262,775 267,767 263,387 
                   

Diluted

 284,262 280,564 285,028 280,244 

Diluted

 288,179 279,206 286,003 279,898 
                   

Comprehensive income, net of tax:

 

Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:

 

Net income

Net income

 $69,564 $83,794 $214,835 $241,981 

Net income

 $119,596 $159,313 $334,431 $401,294 
                   

Other comprehensive income (loss):

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 (3,981) 8,636 105,673 21,246 

Foreign currency translation adjustments

 (172,636) 76,836 (66,963) 98,082 
                   

Pension liability adjustments, net of tax

 (7) (464) 71 (266)

Pension liability adjustments, net of tax

 2,019 (274) 2,090 (540)
                   

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities, net of tax:

 

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities, net of tax:

 
 

Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period

 806 (4,601) 4,711 (2,732) 

Unrealized gains (losses) arising during the period

 475 7,450 5,186 12,812 
 

Reclassification adjustments for gains (losses) included in net income

 (5,628) 398 (5,898) 246  

Reclassification adjustments for losses included in net income

 (141) (991) (6,039) (8,839)
                   
 

Unrealized losses on securities, net of tax

 (4,822) (4,203) (1,187) (2,486) 

Unrealized gains (losses) on securities, net of tax

 334 6,459 (853) 3,973 
                   

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 (8,810) 3,969 104,557 18,494 

Other comprehensive income (loss)

 (170,283) 83,021 (65,726) 101,515 
                   

Comprehensive income

 $60,754 $87,763 $319,392 $260,475 

Comprehensive income (loss)

Comprehensive income (loss)

 $(50,687)$242,334 $268,705 $502,809 
                   

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited, consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except par value amounts)



 June 30,
2008
 December 31,
2007
 
 September 30,
2008
 December 31,
2007
 

ASSETS

ASSETS

 

ASSETS

 

Current assets:

Current assets:

 

Current assets:

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $693,687 $867,012 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $918,736 $867,012 

Short-term investments

 67,688 80,445 

Short-term investments

 76,570 80,445 

Accounts receivable, net

 1,066,478 904,101 

Accounts receivable, net

 1,013,534 904,101 

Inventories

 472,538 439,115 

Inventories

 442,899 439,115 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 170,711 154,183 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 200,666 154,183 

Deferred tax assets

 158,728 164,341 

Deferred tax assets

 157,701 164,341 
           
 

Total current assets

 2,629,830 2,609,197  

Total current assets

 2,810,106 2,609,197 

Property, plant and equipment, net

Property, plant and equipment, net

 2,212,044 1,968,402 

Property, plant and equipment, net

 2,268,854 1,968,402 

Long-term investments

Long-term investments

 493,119 512,937 

Long-term investments

 477,943 512,937 

Goodwill

Goodwill

 1,404,070 1,403,828 

Goodwill

 1,403,570 1,403,828 

Other intangible assets, net

Other intangible assets, net

 1,990,162 1,555,652 

Other intangible assets, net

 1,935,034 1,555,652 

Deferred tax assets

Deferred tax assets

 270,750 95,664 

Deferred tax assets

 331,370 95,664 

Investments in equity securities

Investments in equity securities

 162,930 89,181 

Investments in equity securities

 169,678 89,181 

Other noncurrent assets

Other noncurrent assets

 19,947 66,880 

Other noncurrent assets

 19,030 66,880 
           
 

Total assets

 $9,182,852 $8,301,741  

Total assets

 $9,415,585 $8,301,741 
           

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

Current liabilities:

Current liabilities:

 

Current liabilities:

 

Accounts payable

 $117,180 $128,380 

Accounts payable

 $120,729 $128,380 

Accrued expenses

 636,205 645,645 

Accrued expenses

 640,023 645,645 

Income taxes payable

 23,166 18,479 

Income taxes payable

  18,479 

Deferred revenue

 18,732 13,277 

Deferred revenue

 17,850 13,277 

Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 696,860 696,625 

Current portion of long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 697,426 696,625 
           
 

Total current liabilities

 1,492,143 1,502,406  

Total current liabilities

 1,476,028 1,502,406 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 109,157 113,748 

Long-term debt and capital lease obligations

 125,348 113,748 

Deferred revenue—noncurrent

Deferred revenue—noncurrent

 14,783 16,662 

Deferred revenue—noncurrent

 14,312 16,662 

Other noncurrent liabilities

Other noncurrent liabilities

 525,365 55,988 

Other noncurrent liabilities

 564,013 55,988 
           
 

Total liabilities

 2,141,448 1,688,804  

Total liabilities

 2,179,701 1,688,804 
           

Commitments and contingencies

Commitments and contingencies

 

Commitments and contingencies

 

Stockholders' equity:

Stockholders' equity:

 

Stockholders' equity:

 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value

   

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value

   

Common stock, $0.01 par value

 2,670 2,660 

Common stock, $0.01 par value

 2,703 2,660 

Additional paid-in capital

 5,491,727 5,385,154 

Additional paid-in capital

 5,736,675 5,385,154 

Notes receivable from stockholders

 (13,178) (15,670)

Notes receivable from stockholders

 (12,992) (15,670)

Accumulated earnings

 1,041,550 826,715 

Accumulated earnings

 1,161,146 826,715 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 518,635 414,078 

Accumulated other comprehensive income

 348,352 414,078 
           
 

Total stockholders' equity

 7,041,404 6,612,937  

Total stockholders' equity

 7,235,884 6,612,937 
           
 

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $9,182,852 $8,301,741  

Total liabilities and stockholders' equity

 $9,415,585 $8,301,741 
           

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited, consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited, amounts in thousands)



 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 


 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

Cash Flows from Operating Activities:

 

Net income

 $214,835 $241,981 

Net income

 $334,431 $401,294 

Reconciliation of net income to cash flows from operating activities:

 

Reconciliation of net income to cash flows from operating activities:

 
 

Depreciation and amortization

 183,119 162,827  

Depreciation and amortization

 276,042 246,556 
 

Stock-based compensation

 96,952 102,023  

Stock-based compensation

 143,141 146,441 
 

Provision for bad debts

 5,844 4,569  

Provision for bad debts

 9,065 7,045 
 

Equity in income of equity method investments

 (188) (11,557) 

Equity in (income) loss of equity method investments

 (188) 1,091 
 

Minority interest

  (3,927) 

Minority interest

 (1,592) (3,932)
 

Gains on investments in equity securities, net

 (9,928) (12,931) 

(Gains) losses on investments in equity securities, net

 4,201 (14,036)
 

Deferred income tax benefit

 (172,813) (55,026) 

Deferred income tax benefit

 (236,307) (81,629)
 

Tax benefit from employee stock-based compensation

 25,645 8,349  

Tax benefit from employee stock-based compensation

 57,149 12,459 
 

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

 (8,647) (565) 

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

 (17,470) (1,229)
 

Other

 2,175 3,048  

Other

 4,716 5,585 
 

Increase (decrease) in cash from working capital changes (excluding impact of acquired assets and assumed liabilities):

  

Increase (decrease) in cash from working capital changes (excluding impact of acquired assets and assumed liabilities):

 
 

Accounts receivable

 (98,174) (71,660) 

Accounts receivable

 (99,579) (103,285)
 

Inventories

 (4,812) (47,312) 

Inventories

 (12,651) (32,559)
 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 (15,295) (1,589) 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

 (7,107) (16,790)
 

Income taxes payable

 13,288 (11,496) 

Income taxes payable

 (20,061) (17,419)
 

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue

 (52,692) 69,434  

Accounts payable, accrued expenses and deferred revenue

 275 61,235 
           
 

Cash flows from operating activities

 179,309 376,168  

Cash flows from operating activities

 434,065 610,827 
           

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

Cash Flows from Investing Activities:

 

Purchases of investments

 (289,129) (412,067)

Purchases of investments

 (382,954) (602,451)

Sales and maturities of investments

 319,758 496,986 

Sales and maturities of investments

 412,690 796,612 

Purchases of equity securities

 (81,472) (19,945)

Purchases of equity securities

 (87,695) (20,362)

Proceeds from sales of investments in equity securities

 16,169 19,277 

Proceeds from sales of investments in equity securities

 16,519 20,712 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 (251,785) (180,041)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 (433,987) (281,309)

Distributions from equity method investments

 6,595 10,900 

Acquisition of Bioenvision

 (16,561) (72,229)

Purchases of other intangible assets

 (75,400) (27,618)

Distributions from equity method investments, net

 5,995 17,100 

Other

 2,571 891 

Payment of note receivable from Dyax Corp. 

  7,771 
     

Purchases of other intangible assets

 (82,898) (45,821)
 

Cash flows from investing activities

 (352,693) (111,617)

Other

 5,161 658 
           
 

Cash flows from investing activities

 (563,730) (179,319)
     

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

Cash Flows from Financing Activities:

 

Proceeds from issuance of our common stock

 127,008 68,174 

Proceeds from issuance of our common stock

 294,603 100,276 

Repurchases of our common stock

 (143,012) (63,430)

Repurchases of our common stock

 (143,012) (181,210)

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

 8,647 565 

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

 17,470 1,229 

Payments of debt and capital lease obligations

 (3,886) (3,356)

Payments of debt and capital lease obligations

 (5,281) (4,606)

Increase in bank overdrafts

 29,309 15,935 

Increase in bank overdrafts

 20,889 19,259 

Payments of notes receivable from stockholders

 2,770  

Payments of notes receivable from stockholders

 2,770  

Minority interest contributions

  4,136 

Minority interest contributions

 1,244 4,136 

Other

 34 2,474 

Other

 (1,160) 3,525 
           
 

Cash flows from financing activities

 20,870 24,498  

Cash flows from financing activities

 187,523 (57,391)
           

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 
(20,811

)
 
10,222
 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

 (6,134) (16,423)
           

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

 (173,325) 299,271 

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

 51,724 357,694 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 867,012 492,170 

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

 867,012 492,170 
           

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $693,687 $791,441 

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

 $918,736 $849,864 
           

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash transactions:

Supplemental disclosures of non-cash transactions:

 

Long-Term Debt—Note 11

     

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited, consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements

1.    Description of Business

        We are a global biotechnology company dedicated to making a major impact on the lives of people with serious diseases. Our broad product and service portfolio is focused on rare disorders, renal diseases, orthopaedics, organ transplant, diagnostic and predictive testing, and cancer. We are organized into six financial reporting units, which we also consider to be our reporting segments:

        We report the activities of our diagnostic products, bulk pharmaceuticals and cardiovascular business units under the caption "Other." We report our corporate, general and administrative operations and corporate science activities under the caption "Corporate."

        Effective January 1, 2008, as a result of changes in how we review our business, certain general and administrative expenses, which were formerly allocated amongst our reporting segments and Other, are now allocated to Corporate.

        As a result of our acquisition of Bioenvision in October 2007, our Oncology business unit, which was formerly reported combined with "Other,"Other, now meets the criteria for disclosure as a separate reporting segment. We have revised our 2007 segment disclosures to conform to our 2008 presentation.


Table of Contents


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2.    Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

        Our unaudited, consolidated financial statements for each period include the statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), balance sheets and statements of cash flows for our operations taken as a whole. We have eliminated all intercompany items and transactions in consolidation. We prepare our unaudited, consolidated financial statements following the requirements of the SEC for interim reporting. As permitted under these rules, we condense or omit certain footnotes and other financial information that are normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

        These financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments that we consider necessary for the fair presentation of our financial condition and results of operations. Since these are interim financial statements, you should also read our audited, consolidated financial statements and notes included in our 2007 Form 10-K. Revenues, expenses, assets and liabilities can vary from quarter to quarter. Therefore, the results and trends in these interim financial statements may not be indicative of results for future periods.

        Our unaudited, consolidated financial statements for each period include the accounts of our wholly owned and majority owned subsidiaries. As a result of our adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Interpretation No., or FIN, 46R, "Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities," we also consolidate certain variable interest entities for which we are the primary beneficiary. For consolidated subsidiaries in which we have less than a 100% interest, we record minority interest in our consolidated statements of operations for the ownership interest of the minority owner. We use the equity method of accounting to account for our investments in entities in which we have a substantial ownership interest (20% to 50%) which do not fall in the scope of FIN 46R, or over which we exercise significant influence. Our consolidated net income includes our share of the earnings or losses of these entities.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted in 2008

         FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No., or FAS, 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115."    Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted FAS 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115," which permits, but does not require, entities to irrevocably elect to measure certain financial instruments and other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Unrealizedbasis, with subsequent unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected should be recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.as changes in fair value occur. In adopting FAS 159, we did not elect to measure any new assets or liabilities at their respective fair values and, therefore, the adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on our results of operations andor financial position.

         EITF Issue No. 07-1, "Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements."    In December 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, of the FASB reached a consensus on Issue No. 07-1, "Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements." The EITF concluded on the definition of a collaborative arrangement and that revenues and costs incurred with third parties in connection with collaborative arrangements would be presented gross or net based on the criteria in EITF 99-19 and other accounting literature. Companies are also required to disclose the nature and purpose of collaborative arrangements along with the accounting policies and the classification and amounts attributable to transactions related to the arrangements. EITF 07-1 is effective January 1, 2009 and we will apply it retrospectively to all


Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2.    Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


periods presented for all collaborative arrangements existing as of the effective date. We are evaluating the impact, if any, that EITF 07-1 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

EITF, Issue No. 07-3, "Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities."    In June 2007, the FASB ratified the EITF consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 07-3, "Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities," which provides guidance forrequires that nonrefundable prepaymentsadvanced payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities and directs that such payments should be deferred and capitalized. Such amounts should be recognized as an expense as the goods are delivered or the related services are performed, or until it is no longer expected that the goods will be delivered or the services rendered. EITF Issue No. 07-3 was effective for us beginning



GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2.    Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


January 1, 2008 and we applied it prospectively to new contracts we entered into on or after that date. The implementation of EITF Issue No. 07-3 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

         FASB Staff Position No., or FSP, 157-3, "Determining Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a Market That Is Not Active."    In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3, which clarified how the fair value of a financial asset is determined when the market for that financial asset is inactive. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including for prior periods for which financial statements had not been issued. The implementation of FSP 157-3 did not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.

Effective in 2009

         EITF Issue No. 07-1, "Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements."    In December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-1, which defines collaborative arrangements and establishes reporting requirements for transactions between participants in a collaborative arrangement and between participants in the arrangement and third parties, including the appropriate income statement presentation and classification of, and the required disclosures related to, these arrangements. EITF Issue No. 07-1 is effective January 1, 2009 and we will apply it retrospectively to all periods presented for all collaborative arrangements existing as of the effective date. We are evaluating the impact, if any, that EITF Issue No. 07-1 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

         FAS 141 (revised141(revised 2007), or FAS 141R, "Business Combinations."    In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations," or FAS 141R, which replaces FAS 141, "Business Combinations." FAS 141R retains the underlying conceptsfundamental concept of FAS 141 in that all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisitionpurchase method of accounting but changes a numberand introduces new requirements for the recognition and measurement of significant aspects of applying this method. Acquisitionassets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests. Under FAS 141R, acquisition costs will generally be expensed as incurred; noncontrolling interestsincurred and restructuring costs will be valued at fair value atexpensed subsequent to the acquisition date; in-process research and development, ordate. IPR&D will be recorded at fair valuecapitalized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset at the acquisition date; restructuring costs associated withdate and will either be amortized over the life of the related product or written off as a business combination will generally be expensed subsequentcharge to earnings if the acquisition date; and changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense.project is subsequently abandoned or becomes impaired. FAS 141R is effective for us on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date isoccurring on or after January 1, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the effects if any, that FAS 141R will have on our consolidated financial statements.

         FAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51."    In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51," which establishes new accounting and reporting standards that require the ownershipfor noncontrolling interests, in subsidiaries not held by the parent to be clearly identified, labeled and presented in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent's equity. FAS 160 also requiresformerly known as minority interests, including the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, commonly referredchanges in parent's ownership interest and the valuation of any retained noncontrolling equity investment when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. FAS 160 requires noncontrolling interests to asbe reclassified from the minorityliabilities section or the mezzanine section between liabilities and equity to the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet and to be reported separately from the parent's equity. In addition, FAS 160 requires the results from operations attributed to the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presenteddisclosed separately from those of the parent on the face of the consolidated statement of income. Changes in a parent's ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest must be accounted for consistently, and when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary must be initially measured at fair value. The gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary is measured using the fair value of any noncontrolling equity investment. FAS 160 also requires entities to provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners.operations. FAS 160 is effective for us January 1, 2009 and adoption is prospective only. However, upon adoption, presentation and disclosure requirements described above must be applied retrospectively for all periods presented in our


Table of Contents


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2.    Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


periods presented in our consolidated financial statements. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that FAS 160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

FASB Staff Position, or         FSP No. 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157."    In accordance withFebruary 2008, the provisions ofFASB issued FSP No. 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157," we electedwhich allowed us to defer the implementation of FAS 157, "Fair Value Measurements," as it relates to our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are recognized and disclosed at fair value in our consolidated financial statements on a nonrecurring basis, until January 1, 2009. We are evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of FAS 157, for those assets and liabilities within the scope of FSP No. FAS 157-2, will have on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity. We did not have any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities that would be recognized or disclosed on a recurring basis as of JuneSeptember 30, 2008.

         FAS No. 161, "Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133."    In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133," which amends and expands the disclosure requirements of FAS 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instrumentsderivative instruments and Hedging Activities."hedging activities. FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. FAS 161 is effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that FAS 161 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

         FSP No. 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets."    In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets." FSP No. 142-3which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS 142, "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets".Assets." This change is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS 142 and the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FAS 141R and other generally accepted accounting principles. The requirement for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date and the disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that FSP No. 142-3 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

         FASEITF Issue No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities."    In MayJune 2008, the FASB issued FAS 162, "The HierarchyEITF Issue No. 03-6-1, which clarifies that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends, whether paid or unpaid, participate in undistributed earnings with common stockholders. Awards of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." FAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principlesthis nature are considered participating securities and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparationtwo-class method of financial statements. FAS 162computing basic and diluted earnings per share must be applied. EITF Issue No. 03-6-1 is effective 60 days followingfor us on January 1, 2009 with retrospective application. We do not expect the SEC's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." The implementation of this standard will notEITF Issue No. 03-6-1 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

         EITF Issue No. 07-5, "Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock."    In June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-5, which provides that an entity should use a two step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument's contingent exercise



GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

2.    Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)


and settlement provisions. It also clarifies the impact of foreign currency denominated strike prices and market-based employee stock option valuation instruments on the evaluation. EITF Issue No. 07-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that EITF Issue No. 07-5 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

3.    Fair Value Measurements

        A significant number of our financial instruments are carried at fair value. These assets and liabilities include:


Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

3.    Fair Value Measurements (Continued)


Fair Value Measurement—Definition and Hierarchy

        Effective January 1, 2008, we implemented FAS 157 "Fair Value Measurements," for our financial assets and liabilities that are re-measured and reported at fair value at each reporting period. The adoption of FAS 157 tofor our financial assets and liabilities did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

        FAS 157 provides a framework for measuring fair value and requires expanded disclosures regarding fair value measurements. FAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the "exit price") in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, FAS 157 permits the use of various valuation approaches, including market, income and cost approaches. FAS 157 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the observable inputs be used when available.

        The fair value hierarchy is broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs. We have categorized our fixed income, derivatives and equity securities within the hierarchy as follows:



GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

3.    Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

Valuation Techniques

        Fair value is a market-based measure considered from the perspective of a market participant who would buy the asset or assume the liability rather than our own specific measure. All of our fixed income securities are priced by our custodial agent and nationally known pricing vendors, using a variety of daily data sources, largely readily-available market data and broker quotes. To validate these prices, we compare the fair market values of our fixed income investments using market data from observable and corroborated sources. We also perform the fair value calculations for our derivative and equity securities using market data from observable and corroborated sources. In periods of market inactivity, the observability of prices and inputs may be reduced for manycertain instruments. This condition could cause an instrument to be reclassified from Level 1 to Level 2 or from Level 2 to Level 3.


Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

3.    Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

        The following table sets forth our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis as of JuneSeptember 30, 2008 (amounts in thousands):

DescriptionDescription Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Description Total Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 

Fixed income investments(1):

 Cash equivalents: Money market funds $498,111 $498,111 $ $  Cash equivalents: Money market funds/other $702,745 $702,745 $ $ 
                    

 

Short-term investments:

 

U.S. agency notes

 
8,388
 
 
8,388
 
  

Short-term investments:

 

U.S. Treasury notes

 
3,563
 
3,563
 
 
 

 Corporate notes—global 59,300  59,300   U.S. agency notes 10,605  10,605  
           Corporate notes—global 62,402  62,402  

 Total 67,688  67,688            
           Total 76,570 3,563 73,007  

 

Long-term investments:

 

U.S. Treasury notes

 
105,243
 
105,243
 
 
           

 U.S. agency notes 170,613  170,613   

Long-term investments:

 

U.S. Treasury notes

 
113,684
 
113,684
 
 
 

 Corporate notes—global 217,263  217,263   U.S. agency notes 148,691  148,691  
           Corporate notes—global 215,568  215,568  

 Total 493,119 105,243 387,876            
           Total 477,943 113,684 364,259  

 Total fixed
income
investments
  1,058,918 603,354 455,564            
           Total fixed
income
investments
  1,257,258 819,992 437,266  
          

Derivatives:

 

Foreign exchange contracts(2)

  
(4,824

)
 
 
(4,824

)
 
  

Foreign exchange contracts(2)

  
1,475
 
 
1,475
 
 
                    

Equity holdings:

 

Publicly-traded equity securities(1)

  
57,224
 
57,224
 
 
 

Equity holdings(1):

 

Publicly-traded equity securities

  
63,591
 
63,591
 
 
 
                    

Total assets and (liabilities) at fair value

 $1,111,318 $660,578 $450,740 $ 

Total assets (liabilities) at fair value

Total assets (liabilities) at fair value

 $1,322,324 $883,583 $438,741 $ 
                    

(1)
Changes in the fair value of our fixed income investments and investments in publicly-traded equity securities are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), a component of stockholders' equity, in our consolidated balance sheets. In the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded a charge of $5.3 million to write down our investments in certain venture capital funds, which we account for using the cost method of accounting, because we considered them to be other than temporarily impaired. Our determination of the impairment charge was made using Level 3 measurements under FAS 157. Subsequent to September 30, 2008, these investments continue to be accounted for under the cost method of accounting and are subject to our ongoing reviews for impairment.


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

3.    Fair Value Measurements (Continued)

(2)
As of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, the aggregate fair value of our foreign exchange contracts was an unrealized lossgain of $4.8$1.5 million, which we recorded as an increase to accruedprepaid expenses and other current assets in our consolidated balance sheets as of that date. Changes in the fair value of our forward foreign exchange contracts are recorded in unrealized foreign exchange gains and losses, a component of selling, general and administrative expenses, or SG&A, in our consolidated statements of operations.

        The carrying amounts reflected in our consolidated balance sheets for cash, accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities.


Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

4.    Net Income Per Share

        The following table sets forth our computation of basic and diluted net income per common share (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):



 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 


 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Net income—basic

Net income—basic

 $69,564 $83,794 $214,835 $241,981 

Net income—basic

 $119,596 $159,313 $334,431 $401,294 

Effect of dilutive securities:

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

Interest expense and debt fee amortization, net of tax, related to our 1.25% convertible senior notes

 1,886 1,887 3,772 3,772 

Interest expense and debt fee amortization, net of tax, related to our 1.25% convertible senior notes

 1,885 1,886 5,658 5,658 
                   

Net income—diluted

Net income—diluted

 $71,450 $85,681 $218,607 $245,753 

Net income—diluted

 $121,481 $161,199 $340,089 $406,952 
                   

Shares used in computing net income per common share—basic

Shares used in computing net income per common share—basic

 
266,904
 
263,911
 
267,127
 
263,693
 

Shares used in computing net income per common share—basic

 
269,176
 
262,775
 
267,767
 
263,387
 

Effect of dilutive securities:

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

Effect of dilutive securities:

 

Shares issuable upon the assumed conversion of our 1.25% convertible senior notes

 9,686 9,686 9,686 9,686 

Shares issuable upon the assumed conversion of our 1.25% convertible senior notes

 9,686 9,686 9,686 9,686 

Stock options(1)

 7,123 6,906 7,712 6,829 

Stock options(1)

 8,081 6,584 7,665 6,747 

Restricted stock units(2)

 538 50 491 25 

Restricted stock units (RSUs)(2)

 871 150 618 67 

Warrants and stock purchase rights

 11 11 12 11 

Other

 365 11 267 11 
                   
 

Dilutive potential common shares

 17,358 16,653 17,901 16,551  

Dilutive potential common shares

 19,003 16,431 18,236 16,511 
                   

Shares used in computing net income per common share—diluted(1,2)

 284,262 280,564 285,028 280,244 

Shares used in computing net income per common share—diluted(1)

Shares used in computing net income per common share—diluted(1)

 288,179 279,206 286,003 279,898 
                   

Net income per common share:

Net income per common share:

 

Net income per common share:

 

Basic

 $0.26 $0.32 $0.80 $0.92 

Basic

 $0.44 $0.61 $1.25 $1.52 
                   

Diluted

 $0.25 $0.31 $0.77 $0.88 

Diluted

 $0.42 $0.58 $1.19 $1.45 
                   

(1)
We did not include the securities described in the following table in the computation of diluted earnings per share because these securities were anti-dilutive during the corresponding period (amounts in thousands):

  
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  
 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 

Shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options

  4,258  15,053  3,120  14,268 
  
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
  
 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 

Shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options

  3,123  17,689  3,121  15,408 
(2)
We began issuing restricted stock units, or RSUs, under our 2004 Equity Incentive Plan inIn May 2007, in connection with our2008, we completed a general equity grant program.to eligible employees, 85% of whom received grants consisting entirely of RSUs.

Table of Contents


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

5.    Mergers and Acquisitions

Bioenvision

        Effective October 23, 2007, we completed our acquisition of Bioenvision through the culmination of a two steptwo-step process consisting of a tender offer completed in July 2007, and a merger approved in October 2007. We paid gross consideration of $349.9 million in cash, including $345.4 million for the outstanding shares of Bioenvision Commoncommon and Series A Preferred Stockpreferred stock and options to purchase shares of Bioenvision Common Stock,common stock, and approximately $5 million for acquisition costs. The acquisition of Bioenvision provided us with the rights to clofarabine outside North America.

        In connection with the merger, holders of 2,880,000 shares of Bioenvision Common Stock,common stock, representing less than 5% of the outstanding shares of Bioenvision Common Stockcommon stock on an as-converted basis immediately before the merger became effective, submitted written demands for appraisal of their shares and elected not to accept the $5.60 per share merger consideration. We referreferred to these stockholdersholders as dissenting stockholders. We obtained ownershipdissenters. In September 2008, the appraisal demand was resolved with substantially all of the dissenting shares and accounteddissenters for a total of $16.6 million in cash, consisting of the merger based on 100% ownership of Bioenvision. In October 2007, we accrued $16.1 million in our consolidated balance sheets, which represented our estimate of the price to be paid to the dissenting shareholders upon resolution of their appraisal demand.all other Bioenvision stockholders, plus interest accrued.

        The purchase price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values at the date of acquisition. The excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed amounted to $85.3 million, which was allocated to goodwill. We expectanticipate that substantially all of the amount allocated to goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes.

        The allocation of purchase price remains subject to potential adjustments, including adjustments for liabilities associated with certain exit and tax restructuring activities. We recorded immaterial adjustments to the purchase price in the first half ofnine months ended September 30, 2008.

Purchase of In-Process Research and Development

        We did not complete any acquisitions in the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008. In connection with certain acquisitions that we completed between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007, we acquired various IPR&D projects. The following table sets forth the significant IPR&D projects for the companies and certain assets we acquired between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007 (amounts in millions):

Company/Assets Acquired
 Purchase
Price
 IPR&D Programs Acquired Discount Rate
Used in
Estimating
Cash Flows
 Year of
Expected
Launch
 

Bioenvision (2007)

 $349.9 $125.5 Evoltra (clofarabine)(1,2)  17% 2008-2010 
               

AnorMED Inc. (2006)

 
$

589.2
 
$

526.8
26.1
 

Mozobil (stem cell transplant)(3)
AMD070 (HIV)(4)

  
15
15

%
%
 
2009-2014
 
               

    $552.9         
               
Company Acquired
 Purchase
Price
 IPR&D Programs Acquired Discount Rate
Used in
Estimating
Cash Flows
 Year of
Expected
Launch
 

Bioenvision (2007)

 $349.9 $125.5 Clolar/Evoltra (clofarabine)(1,2)  17% 2009-2013 
               

AnorMED Inc. (AnorMED) (2006)

 
$

589.2
 
$

526.8
26.1
 

Mozobil (stem cell transplant)(3)
AMD070 (HIV)(4)

  
15
15

%
%
 
2009-2014
 
               

    $552.9         
               

(1)
IPR&D charges totaled $125.5 million related to the acquisition of Bioenvision, of which $106.4 million was charged to IPR&D and $19.1 million was charged to equity in income (loss) of equity method investments.


Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

5.    Mergers and Acquisitions (Continued)

(2)
Clofarabine, which is approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia, or ALL, is marketed under the name Clolar in North and South America and as Evoltra elsewhere in the world. The IPR&D projects for Clolarclofarabine are related to the development of the product for the treatment of other medical diseases.


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

5.    Mergers and Acquisitions (Continued)

(3)
In June 2008, we submitted marketing applications for Mozobil in the United States and Europe. We expect to launch Mozobil in these regions during the first half of 2009, following regulatory approval.

(4)
Year of expected launch is not provided for AMD070 at this time because we are assessing our future plans for this program.

Exit Activities

        In connection with severalour acquisitions of our acquisitions,AnorMED and Bioenvision, we initiated integration plans to consolidate and restructure certain functions and operations, including the relocation and termination of certain personnel of these acquired entities and the closure of certain of the acquired entities' leased facilities. These costs have been recognized as liabilities in accordance with EITF Issue No. 95-3, "Recognition of Liabilities in Connection with a Purchase or Business Combination," and are subject to potential adjustments as certain exit activities are confirmed or refined. The following table summarizes the liabilities established for exit activities related to these acquisitions (amounts in thousands):



 Employee
Related
Benefits
 Closure of
Leased
Facilities
 Other
Exit
Activities
 Total
Exit
Activities
 
 Employee
Related
Benefits
 Closure of
Leased
Facilities
 Other
Exit
Activities
 Total
Exit
Activities
 

Balance at December 31, 2006

Balance at December 31, 2006

 $6,105 $24 $ $6,129 

Balance at December 31, 2006

 $6,105 $24 $ $6,129 

Acquisition(1)

 2,601  70 2,671 

Acquisition(1)

 2,601  70 2,671 

Revision of estimates

 (931) 2,593  1,662 

Revision of estimates

 (931) 2,593  1,662 

Payments

 (5,602) (453)  (6,055)

Payments

 (5,602) (453)  (6,055)
                   

Balance at December 31, 2007

Balance at December 31, 2007

 2,173 2,164 70 4,407 

Balance at December 31, 2007

 2,173 2,164 70 4,407 

Revision of estimates

 (182)   (182)

Revision of estimates

 (182)   (182)

Payments

 (1,654) (384) (70) (2,108)

Payments

 (1,834) (530) (70) (2,434)
                   

Balance at June 30, 2008(2)

 $337 $1,780 $ $2,117 

Balance at September 30, 2008(2)

Balance at September 30, 2008(2)

 $157 $1,634 $ $1,791 
                   

(1)
Represents amounts accrued for employee related benefits and other exit activities resulting from our acquisition of Bioenvision. We completed payment of these benefits and other exit activities in June 2008.

(2)
We expect to pay employee benefits related to our acquisition of AnorMED through 2008 and payments related to the closing of thea leased facility through 2012.

Pro Forma Financial Summary

        The following pro forma financial summary is presented as if the acquisition of Bioenvision had been completed as of January 1, 2007. These pro forma combined results are not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have occurred had the acquisition been consummated on that date, or of the future operations of the combined entities. Material nonrecurring charges related to the


Table of Contents


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

5.    Mergers and Acquisitions (Continued)


acquisition of Bioenvision, such as IPR&D charges of $125.5 million, are included in the following pro forma financial summary as of January 1, 2007 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):



 Three Months Ended
June 30, 2007
 Six Months Ended
June 30, 2007
 
 Three Months Ended
September 30, 2007
 Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2007
 

Total revenues

Total revenues

 $937,437 $1,822,742 

Total revenues

 $964,776 $2,787,518 
           

Net income

Net income

 $76,192 $116,965 

Net income

 $154,055 $271,020 
           

Net income per share:

Net income per share:

 

Net income per share:

 

Basic

 $0.29 $0.44 

Basic

 $0.59 $1.03 
           

Diluted

 $0.28 $0.43 

Diluted

 $0.56 $0.99 
           

Weighted average shares outstanding:

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

Weighted average shares outstanding:

 

Basic

 263,911 263,693 

Basic

 262,775 263,387 
           

Diluted

 280,564 280,244 

Diluted

 279,206 279,898 
           

6.    Strategic Transactions

        We classify nonrefundable fees paid outside of a business combination for the acquisition or licensing of products that have not received regulatory approval and have no future alternative use as research and development expense.

Strategic Alliance with Osiris Therapeutics, Inc.

        In October 2008, we entered into a strategic alliance with Osiris Therapeutics, Inc., or Osiris, whereby we obtained an exclusive license to develop and commercialize Prochymal and Chondrogen, mesenchymal stem cell products, outside of the United States and Canada. Osiris will commercialize Prochymal and Chondrogen in the United States and Canada. We will pay Osiris a nonrefundable upfront payment of $75.0 million by November 21, 2008, and an additional $55.0 million nonrefundable upfront license fee on July 1, 2009, both of which will be charged to research and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations during the fourth quarter of 2008.

        Osiris will be responsible for completing, at its own expense, all clinical trials of Prochymal for the treatment of GvHD and Crohn's disease, both of which are in phase 3 trials, and clinical trials of Prochymal and Chondrogen through phase 2 for all other indications. Osiris will be responsible for 60% and we will be responsible for 40% of the clinical trial costs for phase 3 and 4 clinical trials of Prochymal (other than for the treatment of GvHD and Crohn's disease) and Chondrogen. Osiris is eligible to receive:



GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

6.    Strategic Transactions (Continued)

Osiris is also eligible to receive tiered, double-digit royalties from us on sales of Prochymal and Chondrogen outside of the United States and Canada.

Collaboration with PTC Therapeutics, Inc.

        On July 15, 2008, we entered into a collaboration agreement with PTC Therapeutics, Inc., or PTC, to develop and commercialize PTC124, PTC's novel oral therapy in late-stage development for the treatment of nonsense-mutation-mediated Duchenne muscular dystrophy, or DMD, and nonsense-mutation-mediated cystic fibrosis, or CF. Under the terms of the agreement, PTC will commercialize PTC124 in the United States and Canada, and we will commercialize the treatment in all other countries. In connection with the collaboration agreement, we paid PTC a nonrefundable upfront payment of $100.0 million, which we recorded as a charge to research and development expense for our Therapeutics segment in our consolidated statements of operations in July 2008. We classify nonrefundable fees paid outside of a business combination for the acquisition or licensing of products that have not received regulatory approval and have no future alternative use as research and development expense. PTC will conduct and be responsible for the phase 2b trial of PTC124 in DMD, the phase 2b trial of PTC124 in CF and two proof-of-concept studies in other indications to be determined. Once these four studies have been completed, we and PTC will share research and development costs for PTC124 equally. We and PTC will each bear the sales and marketing and other costs associated with the commercialization of PTC124 in our respective territories. PTC is eligible to receive up to $337.0 million in milestone payments as follows:

PTC is also eligible to receive tiered, double-digit royalties from sales of PTC124 outside of the United States and Canada.


Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

6.    Strategic Transactions (Continued)

Strategic Alliance with Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

        On January 7, 2008, we entered into a strategic alliance with Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., or Isis, whereby we obtained an exclusive, worldwide license to develop and commercialize mipomersen, a lipid-lowering drug targeting apolipoprotein B-100, which is currently being developed for the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia, or FH, an inherited disorder that causes exceptionally high levels of LDL-cholesterol. In February 2008, we made a nonrefundable payment to Isis of $150.0 million, of which $80.1 million was recorded as an investment in equity securities in our consolidated balance sheets based on the fair value of the five million shares of Isis common stock we acquired in connection with the transaction, and the remaining $69.9 million was allocated to the mipomersen license, which had not reached technological feasibility and did not have alternative future use. We recorded the $69.9 million license fee as a charge to research and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations in the first quarter of 2008. We classify nonrefundable fees paid outside of a business combination for the acquisition or licensing of products that have not received regulatory approval and have no future alternative use as research and development expense.three months ended March 31, 2008.

        In June 2008, we finalized the terms of our license and collaboration agreement with Isis and paid Isis an additional $175.0 million upfront nonrefundable license fee, which we recorded as a charge to research and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations in June 2008. Under the terms of the agreement, Isis will contribute up to the first $125.0 million in funding for the



GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

6.    Strategic Transactions (Continued)


development of mipomersen and, thereafter, we and Isis will share development costs for mipomersen equally. The initial funding commitment by Isis and shared development funding willwould end when the mipomersen program is profitable. In the event the research and development of mipomersen is terminated prior to Isis completing their funding obligation, we are not entitled to any refund of our $175.0 million upfront payment. Accordingly, the $175.0 million was recorded as research and development expense in June 2008. Isis is eligible to receive up to $750.0 million in commercial milestone payments and up to $825.0 million in development and regulatory milestone payments.

        We will be responsible for funding sales and marketing expenses until mipomersen revenues are sufficient to cover such costs. Profits on mipomersen initially will be allocated 70% to us and 30% to Isis. The profit ratio willwould be adjusted on a sliding scale if and as annual revenues for mipomersen ramp up to $2.0 billion, at which point we willwould share profits equally with Isis. The results of our mipomersen program are included in the results of our cardiovascular business unit, which are reported under the caption "Other" in our segment disclosures.

7.    Inventories



 June 30,
2008
 December 31,
2007
 
 September 30,
2008
 December 31,
2007
 


 (Amounts in thousands)
 
 (Amounts in thousands)
 

Raw materials

Raw materials

 $105,931 $120,409 

Raw materials

 $95,904 $120,409 

Work-in-process

Work-in-process

 147,408 130,812 

Work-in-process

 135,290 130,812 

Finished goods

Finished goods

 219,199 187,894 

Finished goods

 211,705 187,894 
           

Total

 $472,538 $439,115 

Total

 $442,899 $439,115 
           

        In JulyWe capitalize inventory produced for commercial sale, which may result in the capitalization of inventory prior to regulatory approval. If a product is not approved for sale, it would result in the write off of the inventory and a charge to earnings. Our total inventories at September 30, 2008 we wrote off one lotincluded $9.4 million of Thymoglobulin, valued at approximately $5Myozyme and $4.9 million due to a filter failureof Campath inventory, produced at our fill-finishmanufacturing facility in Waterford, Ireland.


Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)Belgium, that have not yet been approved for sale.

8.    Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

Goodwill

        The following table contains the change in our goodwill during the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 (amounts in thousands):


 As of
December 31,
2007
 Adjustments As of
June 30,
2008
  As of
December 31,
2007
 Adjustments As of
September 30,
2008
 

Renal

 $303,951 $ $303,951  $303,951 $ $303,951 

Therapeutics

 355,494  355,494  355,494  355,494 

Transplant

 163,061  163,061  163,061  163,061 

Biosurgery

 7,585  7,585  7,585  7,585 

Oncology

 530,909 477 531,386  530,909 478 531,387 

Other

 42,828 (235) 42,593  42,828 (736) 42,092 
              

Goodwill

 $1,403,828 $242 $1,404,070  $1,403,828 $(258)$1,403,570 
              


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

8.    Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Continued)

        We are required to perform impairment tests related to our goodwill under FAS 142 annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances suggest that the carrying value of an intangible asset may not be recoverable. We completed the required annual impairment tests for our $1.4 billion of net goodwill in the third quarter of 2008 and determined that no impairment charges were required.

Other Intangible Assets

        The following table contains information about our other intangible assets for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):



 As of June 30, 2008 As of December 31, 2007 
 As of September 30, 2008 As of December 31, 2007 


 Gross
Other
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Other
Intangible
Assets
 Gross
Other
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Other
Intangible
Assets
 
 Gross
Other
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Other
Intangible
Assets
 Gross
Other
Intangible
Assets
 Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Other
Intangible
Assets
 

Technology(1)

Technology(1)

 $2,162,028 $(626,643)$1,535,385 $1,680,190 $(545,817)$1,134,373 

Technology(1)

 $2,160,328 $(666,450)$1,493,878 $1,680,190 $(545,817)$1,134,373 

Patents

Patents

 194,560 (113,088) 81,472 194,560 (104,413) 90,147 

Patents

 194,560 (117,426) 77,134 194,560 (104,413) 90,147 

Trademarks

Trademarks

 60,623 (39,498) 21,125 60,634 (36,787) 23,847 

Trademarks

 60,610 (40,851) 19,759 60,634 (36,787) 23,847 

License fees

License fees

 90,871 (33,410) 57,461 90,237 (28,833) 61,404 

License fees

 90,504 (35,432) 55,072 90,237 (28,833) 61,404 

Distribution rights(2)

Distribution rights(2)

 382,976 (147,356) 235,620 307,260 (125,678) 181,582 

Distribution rights(2)

 391,530 (157,929) 233,601 307,260 (125,678) 181,582 

Customer lists(3)

Customer lists(3)

 88,754 (29,924) 58,830 97,031 (33,209) 63,822 

Customer lists(3)

 87,704 (32,281) 55,423 97,031 (33,209) 63,822 

Other

Other

 2,054 (1,785) 269 2,050 (1,573) 477 

Other

 2,045 (1,878) 167 2,050 (1,573) 477 
                           

Total

 $2,981,866 $(991,704)$1,990,162 $2,431,962 $(876,310)$1,555,652 

Total

 $2,987,281 $(1,052,247)$1,935,034 $2,431,962 $(876,310)$1,555,652 
                           

(1)
Effective January 1, 2008, reflects the consolidation of the results of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC at fair value in accordance with FIN 46R, including $480.5 million for the fair value of the manufacturing and commercialization rights to Aldurazyme, net of $12.0$18.0 million of related accumulated amortization. This intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-linedstraight-line basis over a period of 20 years.

(2)
Includes an additional $75.7$84.3 million of other intangible assets resulting from additional payments made or accrued in the first half ofnine months ended September 30, 2008 in connection with our reacquisition of the Synvisc sales and marketing rights from Wyeth, including a $60.0 million milestone payment recorded in May 2008.

(3)
Reflects the write off, during the first quarter ofthree months ended March 31, 2008, of $8.3 million of fully amortized customer lists assigned to our Genetics reporting unit.

All of our other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives.


Table of Contents


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

8.    Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets (Continued)

        All of our other intangible assets are amortized over their estimated useful lives.

The estimated future amortization expense for our other intangible assets for the remainder of fiscal year 2008, the four succeeding fiscal years and thereafter is as follows (amounts in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,
 Estimated
Amortization
Expense(1,2)
  Estimated
Amortization
Expense(1,2)
 

2008 (remaining six months)

 $113,413 

2008 (remaining three months)

 $57,884 

2009

 228,835  228,887 

2010

 242,005  241,794 

2011

 259,820  259,922 

2012

 200,754  200,776 

Thereafter

 567,645  568,166 

(1)
Includes estimated future amortization expense for the Synvisc distribution rights based on the forecasted respective future sales of Synvisc and the resulting future contingent payments we will be required to make to Wyeth, and for the Myozyme patent and technology rights pursuant to a license agreement with Synpac based on forecasted future sales of Myozyme and the potential milestone payments we willmay be required to make to Synpac related to future anticipated regulatory approvals.Synpac. These contingent payments will be recorded as intangible assets when the payments are accrued. Estimated future amortization expense also includes estimated future amortization expense for other arrangements involving contingent payments.

(2)
Excludes future amortization expense related to the $480.5 million of technology recorded effective January 1, 2008, related to our consolidation of the results of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC, because such amortization is entirely offset by the corresponding amortization of a noncurrent liability related to the consolidation of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC.

Table of Contents


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

9.    Investments in Equity Securities

        We recorded the following gains (losses) on investments in equity securities, net of charges for impairment of investments, for the periods presented (amounts in thousands):

 
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Gross gains on investments in equity securities:

             
 

Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Sirtris)

 $10,304 $ $10,304 $ 
 

Therapeutic Human Polyclonals, Inc. (THP)

        10,848 
 

Other

  138  143  913  2,083 
          
  

Total

  10,442  143  11,217  12,931 

Less: charge for impairment of investment

  (1,289)   (1,289)  
          

Gains on investments in equity securities, net

 $9,153 $143 $9,928 $12,931 
          
 
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Gross gains (losses) on investments in equity securities:

             
 

Sirtris Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Sirtris)

 $ $ $10,304 $ 
 

Therapeutic Human Polyclonals, Inc. (THP)

  1,042    1,042  10,848 
 

Other

  (9,861) 1,105  (8,948) 3,188 
          
  

Total

  (8,819) 1,105  2,398  14,036 

Less: charges for impairment of investments

  (5,310)   (6,599)  
          

Gains (losses) on investments in equity securities, net

 $(14,129)$1,105 $(4,201)$14,036 
          

        In the fourth quarter of 2007, we purchased an exclusive option to acquire equity of a private company for $10.0 million in cash. We terminated the option agreement prior to the deadline for exercise and, as a result, we recorded a charge of $10.0 million in the third quarter of 2008 to write off the purchase price of the option. We also recorded a charge of $5.3 million in the third quarter of 2008 to write down our investments in certain venture capital funds to fair value.

        In the second quarter of 2008, we recorded a $10.3 million gain resulting from the liquidation of our investment in the common stock of Sirtris for net cash proceeds of $14.8 million.

        In March 2007, we recorded a $10.8 million gain in connection with the sale of our entire investment in the capital stock of THP, which had a zero cost basis, for net cash proceeds of $10.8 million.

        At JuneSeptember 30, 2008, our stockholders' equity includes $28.8$32.7 million of unrealized gains and $2.6$0.1 million of unrealized losses related to our strategic investments in equity securities.

10.    Joint Venture with BioMarin

        WeIn 1998, we and BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., or BioMarin, formed BioMarin/Genzyme LLC to develop and commercialize Aldurazyme, a recombinant form of the human enzyme alpha-L-iduronidase, used to treat an LSD known as mucopolysaccharidosis I, or MPS I. Prior to January 1, 2008, we recorded our portion of the results of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC in equity in income (loss) of equity method investments in our consolidated statements of operations. Our portion of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC's net income was $6.5$8.2 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2007 and $12.6$20.8 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2007.

        Condensed financial information for BioMarin/Genzyme LLC is summarized below for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 (amounts in thousands):

 
 Three Months Ended
June 30, 2007
 Six Months Ended
June 30, 2007
 

Revenue

 $29,127 $55,948 

Gross margin

  22,434  42,957 

Operating expenses

  (9,560) (18,034)

Net income

  13,016  25,237 

Table of Contents


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

10.    Joint Venture with BioMarin (Continued)

        Condensed financial information for BioMarin/Genzyme LLC is summarized below for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007 (amounts in thousands):

 
 Three Months Ended
September 30, 2007
 Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2007
 

Revenue

 $32,322 $88,270 

Gross margin

  25,284  68,241 

Operating expenses

  (8,709) (26,743)

Net income

  16,793  42,029 

        Effective January 1, 2008, we restructured our relationship with BioMarin/Genzyme LLC regarding the manufacturing and commercialization of Aldurazyme by entering into several new agreements. BioMarin/Genzyme LLC will no longer engageengages in commercial activities related to Aldurazyme and will solely:

Under the restructured relationship, BioMarin/Genzyme LLC has licensed all intellectual property related to Aldurazyme and other collaboration products on a royalty-free basis to BioMarin and us. BioMarin holds the manufacturing rights and we hold the global marketing rights. We are required to pay BioMarin a tiered payment ranging from 39.5% to 50% of worldwide net product sales of Aldurazyme.

        As a result of the restructuring of our relationship with BioMarin/Genzyme LLC, effective January 1, 2008, in accordance with the provisions of FIN 46R, we began consolidating the results of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC. Upon consolidation of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC, we recorded the assets and liabilities of the joint venture in our consolidated balance sheets at fair value. The value of the intellectual property of the joint venture of approximately $480.5 million was recorded as an intangible asset in our consolidated balance sheets and will be amortized over a useful life of 20 years. As this intellectual property has been outlicensed from the joint venture to BioMarin and us for no consideration, a noncurrent liability was recorded for an amount equal to the negative value of these licenses. The noncurrent liability is being amortized over a period of 20 years. We recorded BioMarin's portion of the joint venture's losses, the amount of which was not significant for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as minority interest in our consolidated statements of operations.

11.    Long-Term Debt

1.25% Convertible Senior Notes

        In October 2008, we notified the holders of our $690.0 million in principal of 1.25% convertible senior notes that we plan to redeem the notes on December 1, 2008 using available cash. The notes will be redeemed for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued interest unless they are converted, at the option of the noteholders, into shares of our common stock on or before November 25, 2008, at a conversion price of $71.24 per share.



GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

11.    Long-Term Debt (Continued)

Revolving Credit Facility

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, no amounts were outstanding under our five-year $350.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility.facility, which matures on July 14, 2011. The terms of this credit facility include various covenants, including financial covenants, that require us to meet minimum interest coverage ratios and maximum leverage ratios. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, we were in compliance with these covenants.

Mortgage

        In July 2008, we purchased land and a manufacturing facility we formerly leased in Framingham, Massachusetts, for an aggregate purchase price of $38.9 million, including fees. We paid $20.8 million ofin cash and assumed the remaining $18.1 million in principal outstanding under the existing mortgage for the facility, which bears interest at 5.57% annually and is due in May 2020. We will allocateallocated the purchase price to the fair value of the acquired land and buildings in our consolidated balance sheets asin July 2008, of July 31, 2008.


Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Noteswhich $20.6 million was allocated to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)land and $18.3 million was allocated to buildings.

12.    Stockholders' Equity

Stock Repurchase

        During the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, we repurchased and retired an additional 1,000,000did not repurchase any shares of our common stock at an average price of $69.78 per share for a total of $69.8 million in cash, including fees.under our stock repurchase program. Since June 2007, when we first began repurchasing shares of our common stock under this program, we have repurchased a cumulative total of 5,500,000 shares of our common stock at an average price of $68.09 per share for a total of $374.6 million in cash, including fees. We recorded the repurchases in our consolidated balance sheets as a reduction to our common stock account for the par value of the repurchased shares and as a reduction to our additional paid-in capital account.



GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

12.    Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

Stock-Based Compensation Expense, Net of Estimated Forfeitures

        We allocated pre-tax stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, based on the functional cost center of each employee as follows (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):



 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 


 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Pre-tax stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, charged to:

Pre-tax stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, charged to:

 

Pre-tax stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, charged to:

 

Cost of products and services sold(1)

 $(6,311)$(6,865)$(12,825)$(12,761)

Cost of products and services sold(1)

 $(6,926)$(5,779)$(19,751)$(18,540)

Selling, general and administrative expense

 (31,904) (35,248) (54,793) (57,747)

Selling, general and administrative expense

 (24,222) (25,091) (79,015) (82,838)

Research and development expense

 (16,092) (19,143) (28,677) (31,455)

Research and development expense

 (14,645) (13,518) (43,322) (44,973)
                   
 

Total

 (54,307) (61,256) (96,295) (101,963) 

Total

 (45,793) (44,388) (142,088) (146,351)

Less: tax benefit from stock options

Less: tax benefit from stock options

 16,834 18,703 29,371 31,135 

Less: tax benefit from stock options

 14,025 14,093 43,396 45,228 
                   
 

Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax

 $(37,473)$(42,553)$(66,924)$(70,828) 

Total stock-based compensation expense, net of tax

 $(31,768)$(30,295)$(98,692)$(101,123)
                   

Effect per common share:

Effect per common share:

 

Effect per common share:

 

Basic

 $(0.14)$(0.16)$(0.26)$(0.27)

Basic

 $(0.12)$(0.12)$(0.37)$(0.38)
                   

Diluted

 $(0.13)$(0.15)$(0.23)$(0.25)

Diluted

 $(0.11)$(0.11)$(0.35)$(0.36)
                   

(1)
We also capitalized the following amounts of stock-based compensation expense to inventory, all of which is attributable to participating employees that support our manufacturing operations (amounts in thousands):

  
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  
 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 

Stock-based compensation expense capitalized to inventory

 $3,875 $4,957 $6,996 $7,839 
  
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
  
 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 

Stock-based compensation expense capitalized to inventory

 $3,486 $2,484 $10,482 $10,323 

Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

12.    Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

        We amortize stock-based compensation expense capitalized to inventory based on inventory turns.

        At JuneSeptember 30, 2008, there was $329.6$289.5 million of pre-tax stock-based compensation expense, net of estimated forfeitures, related to unvested awards not yet recognized whichthat is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.42.2 years.

Notes Receivable from Stockholders

        In connection with our acquisition of Biomatrix, we assumed notes receivable from five former employees, directors and consultants of Biomatrix, who we refer to as the Makers of the notes. The notes are full-recourse promissory notes that accrue interest at rates ranging from 5.30% to 7.18% and mature at various dates from May 2007 through September 2009. As of June 30, 2008, there was a total of $13.2 million outstanding for these notes, including $8.1 million of principal and $5.1 million of accrued interest. Of these amounts, a total of $8.0 million of principal and $4.7 million of accrued interest is attributable to one Maker. We record the amount of principal and interest outstanding under the notes in stockholders' equity because the notes were originally received in exchange for the issuance of Biomatrix common stock, which was subsequently converted into Genzyme Stock.



GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

12.    Stockholders' Equity (Continued)

        DuringAs of September 30, 2008, there was a total of $13.0 million of principal and interest outstanding for these notes, of which a total of $12.8 was attributable to one Maker, the second quartermajority of which was past due.

        In October 2008, we received a total of $2.8$10.1 million of cash from this Maker, including $0.3 million for the reimbursement of collection costs, and shares of Genzyme stockStock valued at $0.3$1.7 million from three of the Makers as payment in full of theirthe past due amounts. Two notes including accrued interest. A totalremain outstanding, both of $11.5 millionwhich mature in 2009. The amount of principal and accrued interest has come due underfor the remaining notes but hasis not yet been repaid, all due from one Maker. We are pursuing collection of this past due amount and the notes will continue to accrue interest until the outstanding principal and accrued interest have been repaid.material.

13.    Commitments and Contingencies

        We periodically become subject to legal proceedings and claims arising in connection with our business.

        In April 2005, Church & Dwight Co., Inc., or Church & Dwight, filed a suit in U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey against Abbott Laboratories, or Abbott, claiming that certain over-the-counter pregnancy tests distributed by Abbott between 1999 and 2003 infringed upon patents owned by Church & Dwight. During part of this period, a portion of the test kits distributed by Abbott were manufactured by Wyntek Diagnostics, Inc., or Wyntek, which had agreed to indemnify Abbott for patent infringement related costs and damages for these products. In 2002, we acquired Wyntek and assumed the obligations under this agreement. In June 2008, the court issued a ruling awarding Church & Dwight approximately $29 million in damages based on a jury finding of willful infringement by Abbott. This award has not yet been entered as a final ruling. Abbott will have 60 days from the final entry of this award to file an appeal. Because multiple parties, including Abbott, manufactured infringing product for Abbott during this period, any responsibility that we may have for indemnifying Abbott is only for a portion of its costs and damages related to this case. We currently are disputing with Abbott the percentage of infringing product that was supplied by us and may in the future assert additional claims that, if successful, would reduce or relieve us of any liability.

        Through June 30, 2003, we had three outstanding series of common stock, which we referred to as tracking stocks; Genzyme General Stock (which we now refer to as Genzyme Stock), Biosurgery Stock


Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

13.    Commitments and Contingencies (Continued)


and Molecular Oncology Stock. On August 6, 2007, we reached an agreement in principle to settle for $64.0 million, lawsuits related to our 2003 exchange of Genzyme Stock for Biosurgery Stock. As a result, we recorded a liability for the settlement payment of $64.0 million as a charge to SG&A in our consolidated statements of operations in June 2007, which we subsequently paid in August 2007. The court approved the settlement in October 2007. We have submitted claims to our insurers for reimbursement of portions of the expenses incurred in connection with these cases; the insurers have purported to deny coverage, and therefore, we have not recorded a receivable for any potential recovery from our insurers. We intend to vigorously pursue our rights with respect to insurance coverage and to the extent we are successful, we will record the recovery in our consolidated statements of operations.

        We periodically become subject to legal proceedings and claims arising in connection with our business. Although we cannot predict the outcome of these additional proceedings and claims, we do not believe the ultimate resolution of any of these existing matters would have a material adverse affect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.



GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

14.    Provision for Income Taxes


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 

 2008 2007 2008 2007  2008 2007 2008 2007 

 (Amounts in thousands)
  (Amounts in thousands)
 

Provision for income taxes

 $38,407 $64,090 $98,524 $135,283  $60,512 $66,432 $159,036 $201,715 

Effective tax rate

 36% 43% 31% 36% 34% 29% 32% 33%

        Our effective tax rate for all periods presented varies from the U.S. statutory tax rate as a result of:


        In addition, during the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded net tax benefits of $10.1 million, principally related to a change in our estimate of the amount of foreign production income for the prior year. Our effective tax rate for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 was also impacted by the settlement of IRS audits for the tax years 2004 to 2005. WeDuring the first half of 2008, we recorded a $4.3total of $5.1 million of tax benefitbenefits to our income tax provision reflecting the settlement of various issues. In conjunction with those settlements, we reduced our tax reserves by $4.9 million and recorded current and deferred tax benefits for the remaining portion of the settlement amounts.

        We are currently under IRS audit for the tax years 2006 to 2007 and various states for the tax years 1999 to 2005. We believe that we have provided sufficiently for all audit exposures. Settlement of these audits or the expiration of the statute of limitations on the assessment of income taxes for any tax


Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

14.    Provision for Income Taxes (Continued)


year may result in an adjustment of future tax provisions. Any such adjustment would be recorded upon the effective settlement of the audit or expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.

15.    Segment Information

        In accordance with FAS 131, "Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information," we present segment information in a manner consistent with the method we use to report this information to our management. Applying FAS 131, we have six reporting segments as described above in Note 1.,1, "Description of Business," to these consolidated financial statements. Effective January 1, 2008, as a result of changes in how we review our business, certain general and administrative expenses, which were formerly allocated amongst our reporting segments and Other, are now allocated to Corporate. We have revised our 2007 segment presentation to conform to our 2008 presentation.



GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

15.    Segment Information (Continued)

        We have provided information concerning the operations of these reportable segments in the following tables (amounts in thousands):

 
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Revenues:

             
 

Renal

 $199,419 $172,249 $397,189 $337,926 
 

Therapeutics(1)

  611,935  464,749  1,180,628  894,266 
 

Transplant

  47,843  43,424  93,773  84,701 
 

Biosurgery

  131,215  107,889  242,877  206,282 
 

Genetics

  78,534  73,714  152,863  139,872 
 

Oncology

  33,324  17,430  62,372  39,879 
 

Other

  68,407  53,564  140,653  112,973 
 

Corporate

  457  400  840  703 
          
  

Total

 $1,171,134 $933,419 $2,271,195 $1,816,602 
          

Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

15.    Segment Information (Continued)

 
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Income (loss) before income taxes:

             
 

Renal

 $88,170 $72,757 $181,445 $137,760 
 

Therapeutics(1)

  378,199  292,025  743,409  589,999 
 

Transplant

  (11,496) (7,127) (19,410) (10,325)
 

Biosurgery

  28,670  18,968  47,456  31,835 
 

Genetics

  3,620  11,965  7,729  15,769 
 

Oncology(2)

  (26,666) (12,826) (51,651) (19,712)
 

Other(2,3)

  (175,599) (224) (240,578) 1,415 
 

Corporate(4)

  (176,927) (227,654) (355,041) (369,477)
          
  

Total

 $107,971 $147,884 $313,359 $377,264 
          
 
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Revenues:

             
 

Renal

 $204,817 $184,424 $602,006 $522,350 
 

Therapeutics(1)

  599,329  471,351  1,779,957  1,365,617 
 

Transplant

  47,860  42,881  141,633  127,582 
 

Biosurgery

  122,962  106,146  365,839  312,428 
 

Genetics

  82,058  73,050  234,921  212,922 
 

Oncology

  33,978  22,730  96,350  62,609 
 

Other

  68,895  59,111  209,548  172,084 
 

Corporate

  385  466  1,225  1,169 
          
  

Total

 $1,160,284 $960,159 $3,431,479 $2,776,761 
          

Income (loss) before income taxes:

             
 

Renal

 $91,398 $81,171 $272,843 $218,931 
 

Therapeutics(1,2)

  271,878  315,098  1,015,287  905,096 
 

Transplant

  (14,360) (18,211) (33,770) (28,536)
 

Biosurgery

  23,454  18,991  70,910  50,826 
 

Genetics

  3,025  4,371  10,754  20,140 
 

Oncology(3)

  (24,694) (33,728) (76,345) (53,440)
 

Other(4)

  4,010  1,620  (236,568) 3,035 
 

Corporate(5)

  (174,603) (143,567) (529,644) (513,043)
          
  

Total

 $180,108 $225,745 $493,467 $603,009 
          

(1)
Effective January 1, 2008, as a result of our restructured relationship with BioMarin/Genzyme LLC, instead of sharing all costs and profits of Aldurazyme equally with BioMarin, we began to record all sales of, and cost of sales and SG&A related to, Aldurazyme.

(2)
Includes a charge of $100.0 million recorded in July 2008 for a nonrefundable upfront fee we paid to PTC related to our collaboration agreement with PTC to develop and commercialize PTC124 for the treatment of nonsense-mutation-mediated DMD and nonsense-mutation-mediated CF.

(3)
The results of operations of acquired companies and assets and the amortization expense related to acquired intangible assets are included in segment results beginning on the date of acquisition.

(3)(4)
Includes a chargecharges of $175.0 million recorded in June 2008 and a charge of $69.9 million recorded in February 2008 representing license fees paid to Isis for the exclusive, worldwide rights to mipomersen, which we recorded to research and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations. These charges were incurred by our cardiovascular business unit which had minimal revenues and expenses excluding this charge.

(4)(5)
Loss before income taxes for Corporate includesIncludes our corporate, general and administrative and corporate science activities, all of our stock-based compensation expense, as well as gains (losses) on investments in equity securities, net


GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)

15.    Segment Information (Continued)

        We provide information concerning the assets of our reportable segments in the following table (amounts in thousands):

 
 June 30,
2008
 December 31,
2007
 

Segment Assets(1):

       
 

Renal

 $1,462,292 $1,468,428 
 

Therapeutics(2)

  1,829,763  1,230,128 
 

Transplant

  435,234  415,903 
 

Biosurgery

  515,357  458,412 
 

Genetics

  172,853  148,787 
 

Oncology

  939,637  940,097 
 

Other

  238,972  246,496 
 

Corporate(3)

  3,588,744  3,393,490 
      
  

Total

 $9,182,852 $8,301,741 
      
 
 September 30,
2008
 December 31,
2007
 

Segment Assets(1):

       
 

Renal

 $1,387,762 $1,468,428 
 

Therapeutics(2)

  1,772,381  1,230,128 
 

Transplant

  424,746  415,903 
 

Biosurgery

  506,203  458,412 
 

Genetics

  184,429  148,787 
 

Oncology

  925,792  940,097 
 

Other

  232,539  246,496 
 

Corporate(3)

  3,981,733  3,393,490 
      
  

Total

 $9,415,585 $8,301,741 
      

(1)
Assets for our six reporting segments and Other include primarily accounts receivable, inventory and certain fixed and intangible assets, including goodwill.

(2)
Includes the consolidation of the results of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC at fair value, including $480.5 million of additional technology recorded in the first quarter of 2008 for the fair value of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC's manufacturing and commercialization rights to Aldurazyme, net of $12.0$18.0 million of related accumulated amortization.

(3)
Includes the assets related to our corporate, general and administrative operations, and corporate science activities that we do not allocate to a particular segment. Segment assets for Corporate consist of the following (amounts in thousands):



 June 30,
2008
 December 31,
2007
 
 September 30,
2008
 December 31,
2007
 

Cash, cash equivalents, short- and long-term investments in debt securities

Cash, cash equivalents, short- and long-term investments in debt securities

 $1,254,495 $1,460,394 

Cash, cash equivalents, short- and long-term investments in debt securities

 $1,473,249 $1,460,394 

Deferred tax assets, net

Deferred tax assets, net

 429,478 260,005 

Deferred tax assets, net

 489,071 260,005 

Property, plant & equipment, net

Property, plant & equipment, net

 1,407,459 1,240,992 

Property, plant & equipment, net

 1,484,523 1,240,992 

Investments in equity securities

Investments in equity securities

 162,930 89,181 

Investments in equity securities

 169,678 89,181 

Other assets

Other assets

 334,382 342,918 

Other assets

 365,212 342,918 
           

Total

 $3,588,744 $3,393,490 

Total

 $3,981,733 $3,393,490 
           

Table of Contents

ITEM 2.    MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES' FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        When reviewing the discussion below, you should keep in mind the substantial risks and uncertainties that characterize our business. In particular, we encourage you to review the risks and uncertainties described under the heading "Risk Factors" below. These risks and uncertainties could cause actual results to differ materially from those forecasted in forward-looking statements or implied by past results and trends. Forward-looking statements are statements that attempt to project or anticipate future developments in our business; we encourage you to review the examples of forward-looking statements under "Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements" at the beginning of this report. These statements, like all statements in this report, speak only as of the date of this report (unless another date is indicated), and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the statements in light of future developments.

INTRODUCTION

        We are a global biotechnology company dedicated to making a major impact on the lives of people with serious diseases. Our broad product and service portfolio is focused on rare disorders, renal diseases, orthopaedics, organ transplant, diagnostic and predictive testing, and cancer. We are organized into six financial reporting units, which we also consider to be our reporting segments:

        We report the activities of our diagnostic products, bulk pharmaceuticals and cardiovascular business units under the caption "Other." We report our corporate, general and administrative operations and corporate science activities under the caption "Corporate."


        Effective January 1, 2008, as a result of a change in how we review our business, certain general and administrative expenses which were formerly allocated amongst our reporting segments and Other, are now allocated to Corporate.


Table of Contents

        As a result of our acquisition of Bioenvision in October 2007, our Oncology business unit, which was formerly reported combined with "Other," now meets the criteria for disclosure as a separate reporting segment. We have revised our 2007 segment disclosures to conform to our 2008 presentation.

MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

        The following acquisitions were accounted for as business combinations and, accordingly, we have included their results of operations in our consolidated statements of operations from the date of acquisition.

Diagnostic Assets of Diagnostic Chemicals Limited

        On December 3, 2007, we acquired certain diagnostic assets from Diagnostic Chemicals Limited, or DCL, a privately-held diagnostics and biopharmaceutical company, including DCL's line of over 50 formulated clinical chemistry reagents and their diagnostics operations in Prince Edward Island, Canada and Connecticut. We paid consideration of $53.8 million in cash.

Bioenvision

        Effective October 23, 2007, we completed our acquisition of Bioenvision through the culmination of a two steptwo-step process consisting of a tender offer completed in July 2007, and a merger approved in October 2007. We paid gross consideration of $349.9 million in cash, including $345.4 million for the outstanding shares of Bioenvision Commoncommon and Series A Preferred Stockpreferred stock and options to purchase shares of Bioenvision Common Stock,common stock, and approximately $5 million for acquisition costs. Net consideration was $304.7 million as we acquired Bioenvision's cash and cash equivalents totaling $45.2 million.

        Bioenvision was focused on the acquisition, development and marketing of compounds and technologies for the treatment of cancer, autoimmune disease and infection. The acquisition of Bioenvision providesprovided us with the rights to clofarabine outside North America. We currently market clofarabine in the United States and Canada under the brand name Clolar for relapsed and refractory pediatric ALL patients. In Europe, we co-developed clofarabine with Bioenvision and, prior to the acquisition, Bioenvision had been marketing the product under the brand name Evoltra, alsoClofarabine, which is approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory pediatric ALL, patients.is marketed under the name Clolar in North and South America and as Evoltra elsewhere in the world. We are developing clofarabine for diseases with significantly larger patient populations, including use as a first-line therapy for the treatment of adult AML.acute myelogenous leukemia, or AML, in adults. Clofarabine has been granted orphan drug status for the treatment of ALL and AML in both the United States and the European Union.

STRATEGIC TRANSACTIONS

        We classify nonrefundable fees paid outside of a business combination for the acquisition or licensing of products that have not received regulatory approval and have no future alternative use as research and development expense.

Strategic Alliance with Osiris

        In October 2008, we entered into a strategic alliance with Osiris, whereby we obtained an exclusive license to develop and commercialize Prochymal and Chondrogen, mesenchymal stem cell products, outside of the United States and Canada. Osiris will commercialize Prochymal and Chondrogen in the United States and Canada. We will pay Osiris a nonrefundable upfront payment of $75.0 million by November 21, 2008 and an additional $55.0 million nonrefundable upfront license fee on July 1, 2009,



both of which will be charged to research and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations during the fourth quarter of 2008.

        Osiris will be responsible for completing, at its own expense, all clinical trials of Prochymal for the treatment of GvHD and Crohn's disease, both of which are in phase 3 trials, and clinical trials of Prochymal and Chondrogen through phase 2 for all other indications. Osiris will be responsible for 60% and we will be responsible for 40% of the clinical trial costs for phase 3 and 4 clinical trials of Prochymal (other than for the treatment of GvHD and Crohn's disease) and Chondrogen. Osiris is eligible to receive:

Osiris is also eligible to receive tiered, double-digit royalties from sales of Prochymal and Chondrogen outside of the United States and Canada.

Collaboration with PTC

        On July 15, 2008, we entered into a collaboration agreement with PTC to develop and commercialize PTC124, PTC's novel oral therapy in late-stage development for the treatment of nonsense-mutation-mediated DMD and nonsense-mutation-mediated CF. Under the terms of the agreement, PTC will commercialize PTC124 in the United States and Canada, and we will commercialize the treatment in all other countries. In connection with the collaboration agreement, we paid PTC a nonrefundable upfront payment of $100.0 million, which we recorded as a charge to research and development expense for our Therapeutics segment in our consolidated statements of operations in July 2008. We classify nonrefundable fees paid outside of a business combination for the acquisition or licensing of products that have not received regulatory approval and have no future alternative use as research and development expense. PTC will conduct and be responsible for the phase 2b trial of PTC124 in DMD, the phase 2b trial of PTC124 in CF and two proof-of-concept studies in other indications to be determined. Once these four studies have been completed, we and PTC will share research and development costs for


Table of Contents


PTC124 equally. We and PTC will each bear the sales and marketing and other costs associated with the commercialization of PTC124 in our respective territories. PTC is eligible to receive up to $337.0 million in milestone payments as follows:

PTC is also eligible to receive tiered, double-digit royalties from sales of PTC124 outside of the United States and Canada.

Strategic Alliance with Isis

        On January 7, 2008, we entered into a strategic alliance with Isis, whereby we obtained an exclusive, worldwide license to develop and commercialize mipomersen, a lipid-lowering drug targeting apolipoprotein B-100, which is currently being developed for the treatment of FH, an inherited disorder that causes exceptionally high levels of LDL-cholesterol. In February 2008, we made a nonrefundable payment to Isis of $150.0 million, of which $80.1 million was recorded as an investment in equity securities in our consolidated balance sheets based on the fair value of the five million shares



of Isis common stock we acquired in connection with the transaction and the remaining $69.9 million was allocated to the mipomersen license, which had not reached technological feasibility and did not have alternative future use. We recorded the $69.9 million license fee as a charge to research and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations in the first quarter of 2008. We classify nonrefundable fees paid outside of a business combination for the acquisition or licensing of products that have not received regulatory approval and have no future alternative use as research and development expense.

        In June 2008, we finalized the terms of our license and collaboration agreement with Isis and paid Isis an additional $175.0 million upfront nonrefundable license fee, which we recorded as a charge to research and development expense in our consolidated statements of operations in June 2008. Under the terms of the agreement, Isis will contribute up to the first $125.0 million in funding for the development of mipomersen and, thereafter, we and Isis will share development costs for mipomersen equally. The initial funding commitment by Isis and shared development funding willwould end when the mipomersen program is profitable. In the event the research and development of mipomersen is terminated prior to Isis completing their funding obligation, we are not entitled to any refund of our $175.0 million upfront payment. Accordingly, the $175.0 million was recorded as research and development expense in June 2008. Isis is eligible to receive up to $750.0 million in commercial milestone payments and up to $825.0 million in development and regulatory milestone payments.

        We will be responsible for funding sales and marketing expenses until mipomersen revenues are sufficient to cover such costs. Profits on mipomersen initially will be allocated 70% to us and 30% to Isis. The profit ratio willwould be adjusted on a sliding scale if and as annual revenues for mipomersen ramp up to $2.0 billion, at which point we willwould share profits equally with Isis. The results of our mipomersen program will be included in the results of our cardiovascular business unit, which are reported under the caption "Other" in our segment disclosures.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND SIGNIFICANT JUDGMENTS AND ESTIMATES

        Our critical accounting policies and significant judgments and estimates are set forth under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Genzyme Corporation and Subsidiaries' Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates" in Exhibit 13 to our 2007 Form 10-K. There have been no significant changes to our critical accounting policies or significant judgments and estimates since December 31, 2007.

        During the third quarter of 2008, we completed the required annual impairment tests for our $1.4 billion of net goodwill and determined that no impairment charge was required.

        Additional


Table of Contents


information regarding our provisions and estimates for our product sales allowances, sales allowance reserves and accruals, and distributor fees, and the key assumptions we use to determine the fair value assigned to in-process research and developmentIPR&D are included below.

Revenue Recognition

Product Sales Allowances

        Sales of many biotechnology products in the United States are subject to increased pricing pressure from managed care groups, institutions, government agencies, and other groups seeking discounts. We and other biotechnology companies in the U.S. market are also required to provide statutorily defined rebates and discounts to various U.S. government agencies in order to participate in the Medicaid program and other government-funded programs. In most international markets, we operate in an environment where governments may, and in some cases have, mandated cost-containment programs, placed restrictions on physician prescription levels and patient reimbursements, emphasized greater use of generic drugs and enacted across-the-board price cuts as methods to control costs. The sensitivity of our estimates can vary by program, type of customer and geographic location. Estimates associated with Medicaid and other government allowances may become subject to adjustment in a subsequent period.


        We record product sales net of the following significant categories of product sales allowances:


Table of Contents

        Our provisions for product sales allowances reduced gross product sales as follows (amounts in thousands):



 Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 


 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 


 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Product sales allowances:

Product sales allowances:

 

Product sales allowances:

 

Contractual adjustments

 $107,095 $101,396 6%$209,014 $186,191 12%

Contractual adjustments

 $153,799 $106,807 44%$362,813 $292,998 24%

Discounts

 5,503 4,779 15% 11,008 9,193 20%

Discounts

 5,655 5,296 7% 16,663 14,489 15%

Sales returns

 4,917 5,705 (14)% 11,668 7,422 57%

Sales returns

 8,434 1,826 >100% 20,102 9,248 >100%
                           
 

Total product sales allowances

 $117,515 $111,880 5%$231,690 $202,806 14% 

Total product sales allowances

 $167,888 $113,929 47%$399,578 $316,735 26%
                           

Total gross product sales

Total gross product sales

 $1,189,317 $957,362 24%$2,309,759 $1,846,478 25%

Total gross product sales

 $1,226,184 $981,611 25%$3,535,943 $2,828,089 25%
                           

Total product sales allowances as a percent of total gross product sales

Total product sales allowances as a percent of total gross product sales

 10% 12%   10% 11%   

Total product sales allowances as a percent of total gross product sales

 14% 12%   11% 11%   

        Total product sales allowances increased $5.6$54.0 million, or 5%47%, for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, and $28.9$82.8 million, or 14%26%, for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, primarily due to an increase in overall gross product sales and to a lesser extent, changes in rebate rates orand product mix. The decreaseincrease in sales returns allowances for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same



period of 2007, is primarily due to increased sales returns allowances for our Renal segment due to a Renagel price increase in August 2008 and revisions to our estimates of the volume of product returns for Hectorol. The increase in sales returns allowances for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, is primarily due to a slight decrease inprice increases and increased estimates for the volume of product returns for our Renal, segment. The increase in sales returns allowances for the six months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, is primarily due to increased estimates for the volume of product returns for our Transplant Biosurgery and RenalBiosurgery segments.

        Total estimated product sales allowance reserves and accruals in our consolidated balance sheets increased 6%27% to approximately $164$198 million as of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to approximately $155 million as of December 31, 2007, primarily due to increased product sales.sales and changes in the timing of certain payments. Our actual results have not differed materially from amounts recorded. The annual variation has been less than 0.5% of total product sales for each of the last three years.

Distributor Fees

        EITF Issue No. 01-9, "Accounting for Consideration given by a Vendor to a Customer (including a Reseller of a Vendor's Products)" specifies that cash consideration (including a sales incentive) given by a vendor to a customer is presumed to be a reduction of the selling prices of the vendor's products or services and, therefore, should be characterized as a reduction of revenue. We include such fees in contractual adjustments, which are recorded as a reduction to product sales. That presumption is overcome and the consideration should be characterized as a cost incurred if, and to the extent that, both of the following conditions are met:

        We record fees paid to our distributors for services as a charge to SG&A, a component of operating expenses, only if the criteria set forth above are met. The following table sets forth the


Table of Contents


distributor fees recorded as a reduction to product sales and charged to SG&A (amounts in thousands):

 
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Distributor fees:

             
 

Included in contractual adjustments and recorded as a reduction to product sales

 $1,611 $3,198 $6,019 $6,290 
 

Charged to SG&A

  3,569  3,458  6,520  6,434 
          
  

Total distributor fees

 $5,180 $6,656 $12,539 $12,724 
          
 
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Distributor fees:

             
 

Included in contractual adjustments and recorded as a reduction to product sales

 $3,437 $2,948 $9,723 $9,238 
 

Charged to SG&A

  3,519  3,210  10,039  9,644 
          
  

Total distributor fees

 $6,956 $6,158 $19,762 $18,882 
          

        Total distributor fees decreased $1.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, primarily due to decreased estimates for distributor fees for our Renal segment.

In-Process Research and Development

        In-process research and development represents the fair value assigned to incomplete technologies that we acquire, which at the time of acquisition have not reached technological feasibility and have no alternative future use. The fair value of such technologies is expensed upon acquisition. A technology is considered to have an alternative future use if it is probable that the acquirer will use the asset in its current, incomplete state as it existed at the acquisition date, the asset will be used in another research and development project that has not yet commenced, and economic benefit is anticipated from that use. If a technology is determined to have an alternative future use, then the fair value of the program would be recorded as an asset on the balance sheet rather than expensed. None of the incomplete technology programs we have acquired through our business combinations have reached technological feasibility nor had an alternative future use and, therefore, the fair value of those programs was



expensed on the acquisition date. Substantial additional research and development will be required before any of our acquired programs reach technological feasibility. In addition, once research is completed, each underlying product candidate will need to complete a series of clinical trials and receive regulatory approvals prior to commercialization.

        Charges for in-process research and development acquired through business combinations, which we refer to as IPR&D, are classified in our consolidated statements of operations within the line item Purchase of In-Process Research and Development. Conversely, nonrefundable fees paid outside of a business combination for the acquisition or licensing of products that have not received regulatory approval and have no future alternative use are classified in our consolidated statements of operations within the line item Research and Development.

        Management assumes responsibility for determining the valuation of the acquired IPR&D programs. The fair value assigned to IPR&D for each acquisition is estimated by discounting, to present value, the future cash flows expected from the programs since the date of our acquisition. Accordingly, such cash flows reflect our estimates of revenues, costs of sales, operating expenses and income taxes from the acquired IPR&D programs based on the following factors:


Table of Contents

        The discount rates used are commensurate with the uncertainties associated with the economic estimates described above. The resulting discounted future cash flows are then probability-adjusted to reflect the different stages of development, the time and resources needed to complete the development of the product and the risks of advancement through the product approval process. In estimating the future cash flows, we also consider the tangible and intangible assets required for successful exploitation of the technology resulting from the purchased IPR&D programs and adjust future cash flows for a charge reflecting the contribution to value of these assets. Such contributory tangible and intangible assets may include, but are not limited to, working capital, fixed assets, assembled workforce, customer relationships, patents, trademarks, and core technology.

        Use of different estimates and judgments could yield materially different results in our analysis and could result in materially different asset values and IPR&D expense. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully develop and complete the acquired IPR&D programs and profitably commercialize the underlying product candidates before our competitors develop and commercialize products for the same indications. Moreover, if certain of the acquired IPR&D programs fail, are abandoned during development, or do not receive regulatory approval, then we may not realize the future cash flows we have estimated and recorded as IPR&D on the acquisition date, and we may also not recover the research and development investment made since the acquisition to further develop that program. If such circumstances were to occur, our future operating results could be materially adversely impacted.


        We have included additional information on the nature, timing and estimated costs necessary to complete our acquired IPR&D programs and the key assumptions used to determine the fair value of specific IPR&D programs under the caption "Purchase of In-Process Research and Development" in this "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

        The following discussion summarizes the key factors our management believes are necessary for an understanding of our consolidated financial statements.

REVENUES

        The components of our total revenues are described in the following table (amounts in thousands):



 Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 


 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 


 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Product revenue

Product revenue

 $1,071,801 $845,482 27%$2,078,069 $1,643,672 26%

Product revenue

 $1,058,296 $867,682 22%$3,136,365 $2,511,354 25%

Service revenue

Service revenue

 90,622 82,475 10% 176,486 158,356 11%

Service revenue

 92,586 83,177 11% 269,072 241,533 11%
                           

Total product and service revenue

 1,162,423 927,957 25% 2,254,555 1,802,028 25%

Total product and service revenue

 1,150,882 950,859 21% 3,405,437 2,752,887 24%

Research and development revenue

Research and development revenue

 8,711 5,462 59% 16,640 14,574 14%

Research and development revenue

 9,402 9,300 1% 26,042 23,874 9%
                           

Total revenues

 $1,171,134 $933,419 25%$2,271,195 $1,816,602 25%

Total revenues

 $1,160,284 $960,159 21%$3,431,479 $2,776,761 24%
                           

Table of Contents

Product Revenue

        We derive product revenue from sales of:


        The following table sets forth our product revenue on a reporting segment basis (amounts in thousands):



 Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 


 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 


 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Renal:

Renal:

 

Renal:

 

Renagel/Renvela (including sales of bulk sevelamer)

 $168,567 $144,954 16%$337,261 $282,338 19%

Renagel/Renvela (including sales of bulk sevelamer)

 $170,992 $154,159 11%$508,253 $436,497 16%

Hectorol

 30,852 27,295 13% 59,928 55,588 8%

Hectorol

 33,825 30,265 12% 93,753 85,853 9%
                           
 

Total Renal

 199,419 172,249 16% 397,189 337,926 18% 

Total Renal

 204,817 184,424 11% 602,006 522,350 15%
                           

Therapeutics:

Therapeutics:

 

Therapeutics:

 

Cerezyme

 319,360 282,979 13% 623,663 546,770 14%

Cerezyme

 309,280 286,071 8% 932,943 832,841 12%

Fabrazyme

 126,608 104,349 21% 243,083 205,013 19%

Fabrazyme

 125,619 104,610 20% 368,702 309,623 19%

Thyrogen

 39,448 29,540 34% 73,233 55,878 31%

Thyrogen

 38,153 26,828 42% 111,386 82,706 35%

Myozyme

 77,222 46,745 65% 144,546 84,664 71%

Myozyme

 76,663 53,568 43% 221,209 138,232 60%

Aldurazyme

 38,667  N/A 75,506  N/A 

Aldurazyme

 38,236  N/A 113,742  N/A 

Other Therapeutics

 10,437 705 >100% 20,209 872 >100%

Other Therapeutics

 11,367 153 >100% 31,576 1,025 >100%
                           
 

Total Therapeutics

 611,742 464,318 32% 1,180,240 893,197 32% 

Total Therapeutics

 599,318 471,230 27% 1,779,558 1,364,427 30%
                           

Transplant:

Transplant:

 

Transplant:

 

Thymoglobulin/Lymphoglobuline

 45,592 41,376 10% 89,265 80,818 10%

Thymoglobulin/Lymphoglobuline

 45,492 41,036 11% 134,757 121,854 11%

Other Transplant

 2,251 2,048 10% 4,508 3,703 22%

Other Transplant

 2,368 1,845 28% 6,876 5,548 24%
                           
 

Total Transplant

 47,843 43,424 10% 93,773 84,521 11% 

Total Transplant

 47,860 42,881 12% 141,633 127,402 11%
                           

Biosurgery:

Biosurgery:

 

Biosurgery:

 

Synvisc/Synvisc-One

 70,927 64,863 9% 127,069 118,459 7%

Synvisc/Synvisc-One

 67,513 61,175 10% 194,582 179,634 8%

Sepra products

 34,780 25,076 39% 65,384 48,191 36%

Sepra products

 33,001 26,381 25% 98,385 74,572 32%

Other Biosurgery

 13,392 8,386 60% 26,973 18,958 42%

Other Biosurgery

 11,859 7,107 67% 38,832 26,065 49%
                           
 

Total Biosurgery

 119,099 98,325 21% 219,426 185,608 18% 

Total Biosurgery

 112,373 94,663 19% 331,799 280,271 18%
                           

Oncology

Oncology

 25,939 14,574 78% 48,220 31,271 54%

Oncology

 25,828 16,131 60% 74,048 47,402 56%
                           

Other product revenue

Other product revenue

 67,759 52,592 29% 139,221 111,149 25%

Other product revenue

 68,100 58,353 17% 207,321 169,502 22%
                           
 

Total product revenues

 $1,071,801 $845,482 27%$2,078,069 $1,643,672 26% 

Total product revenues

 $1,058,296 $867,682 22%$3,136,365 $2,511,354 25%
                           

Table of Contents

Renal

        On October 22, 2007, the FDA granted marketing approval for Renvela, a second generation buffered form of Renagel for the control of serum phosphorus in patients with chronic kidney disease, or CKD, on dialysis. In March 2008, we launched Renvela for dialysis patients in the United States and the product is now included in most U.S. health plan formularies. We are currently pursuing regulatory approvals for Renvela in Europe, South America and other international markets.

        Sales of Renagel/Renvela, including sales of bulk sevelamer, increased 16%11% to $168.6$171.0 million for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007. Renagel price increases2007, primarily due to the addition of $9.1 million of revenue from sales of Renvela in the United States, for which there was no similar amount in Aprilthe same period of 2007, accounted for $4.7and a $7.7 million increase in sales of the additional revenue, while increased end-user demand worldwide accounted for $11.4 millionRenagel, including sales of additional revenue.bulk sevelamer. The strengthening of foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, against the U.S. dollar, for the three months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, positively impacted Renagel revenue by $9.1 million.$5.5 million and increased end-user demand accounted for an additional $2.9 million of revenue. A Renagel price increase in the United States in August 2008 did not have a material impact on Renagel revenue for the period. Sales of Renagel/



Renvela, including sales of bulk sevelamer, were 14%15% of our total revenuerevenues for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to 16% for the same period of 2007.

        Sales of Renagel/Renvela, including sales of bulk sevelamer, increased 19%16% to $337.3$508.3 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007.2007, primarily due to the addition of $14.5 million of revenue from sales of Renvela in the United States, for which there was no similar amount in the same period of 2007, and a $57.3 million increase in sales of Renagel, including sales of bulk sevelamer. Increased end-user demand accounted for $26.1 million of the additional revenue and a Renagel price increasesincrease in the United States in April 2007 accounted for $11.2$9.9 million of the additional revenue, while increased end-user demand worldwide accounted for $23.0 million of additionalRenagel revenue. The strengthening of foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, against the U.S. dollar, for the six months ended June 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, positively impacted Renagel revenue by $17.7$23.2 million. Sales of Renagel/Renvela, including sales of bulk sevelamer, were 15% of our total revenuerevenues for the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to 16% for the same period of 2007.

        On October 22, 2007, the FDA granted marketing approval for Renvela, a second-generation buffered form of Renagel for the control of serum phosphorus in patients with CKD on dialysis. In March 2008, we launched Renvela for dialysis patients in the United States and the product is now included in more than 85% of health plan formularies. Sales of Renvela in the United States were $0.8 million for the three months ended and $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008. We are currently pursuing regulatory approvals in Europe, South America and in other international markets.

        In October 2007, an FDA advisory committee voted to recommend that the agency extend the indications for phosphate binders to include pre-dialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia. We are engaged in discussions withIn June 2008, we and two other companies submitted a position paper to the FDA regarding the expansionexpanded use of phosphate binders. We received a written response from the product's labelingFDA and we are in the process of providing the additional information requested. We anticipate that this indication will be added to include CKD patients with hyperphosphatemia who have not progressed to dialysis.Renvela's label by the middle of 2009. In addition, we expect to file for approval of a powder form of Renvela that may make it easier for patients to comply with their prescribed treatment program. While Renagel will remain available for a period of time, our long-term goal is to transition all patients to Renvela.

        Sales of Hectorol increased 13%12% to $30.9$33.8 million for the three months ended and 8%9% to $59.9$93.8 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to $27.3 million and $55.6 million for the same periods of 2007, primarily due to higher end-user demand.Hectorol price increases in the third quarter of 2007 and second quarter of 2008, which accounted for $3.1 million for the three months ended and $6.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of the additional revenue.

        We expect sales of Renagel/Renvela and Hectorol to continue to increase, driven primarily by growing patient access to these products, including through the Medicare Part D program in the United States, and the continued adoption of the products by nephrologists worldwide. Adoption rates for Renagel/Renvela are expected to trend favorably as a result of the recent introduction of Renvela in the U.S. market, anticipation of athe potential label expansion to include hyperphosphatemic patients who are not on dialysis, and the introduction of a powder formulation expected in the first half of 2009. Adoption rates for Hectorol are expected to trend favorably as a result of growth ofin the CKD market and the anticipated launch of a 1 mg capsule form of Hectorol in the first half of 2009. In addition, we expect adoption rates to increase for both Renagel/Renvela and Hectorol as thea result of our recent expansion and redeployment of our Renal sales force.

        Renagel/Renvela and Hectorol compete with several other marketed products and our future sales may be impacted negatively by these products. Both Renagel and Hectorol are also are subjects of Abbreviated New Drug Applications, (ANDAs)or ANDAs, containing "Paragraph IV certifications," which is the


Table of Contents


filing a generic drug manufacturer uses to challenge one or more patents in order to seek U.S. regulatory approval to market a generic version of a drug prior to the expiration date of those patents.

        In the case of Renagel, the ANDA Paragraph IV certification relates only to one of our Renagel patents, namely our patent that covers features of our tablet dosage form. This patent expires in 2020. The2020, and the ANDA applicant has alleged that its generic tabletproposed product would not infringe our tablet dosage formthat patent. We reviewed the Paragraph IV certification and did not initiate patent but we have not yet received sufficient information frominfringement litigation within the ANDA applicant to assess the merits of this position.45-day statutory period. The ANDA does not contain a Paragraph IV certification with respect to our Renagel pharmaceutical composition and medical use patent estate, which protect the product and its approved indications until 2014.


        In the case of Hectorol, the ANDA applicant has submitted a Paragraph IV certification alleging the invalidity of our patent related to the use of Hectorol to treat hyperparathyroidism secondary to end-stage renal disease (which patent expires in 2014), and alleging non-infringement of our patent claimingcovering our highly purified form of Hectorol (which patent expires in 2021). We initiated patent infringement litigation in February 2008. We believe that our patents are valid, and have not yet received sufficient information from the ANDA application to assessare currently assessing the merits of itsthe ANDA applicant's non-infringement allegation.positions.

        If either of the ANDA filers or any other generic drug manufacturer were to receive approval to sell a generic version of Renagel or Hectorol, our revenues from those products would be adversely affected. In addition, our ability to continue to increase sales of Renagel/Renvela and Hectorol will depend on many other factors, including our ability to optimize dosing and improve patient compliance with Renagel/Renvela dosing, the availability of reimbursement from third-party payors and the extent of coverage, including under the Medicare Part D program. Also, the accuracy of our estimates of fluctuations in the payor mix and our ability to effectively manage wholesaler inventories and the levels of compliance with the inventory management programs we implemented for Renagel/Renvela and Hectorol with our wholesalers could impact the revenue from our Renal reporting segment that we record from period to period.

Therapeutics

        Therapeutics product revenue increased 32%27% to $611.7$599.3 million for the three months ended and 32%30% to $1.2$1.8 billion for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, due to continued growth in sales of Cerezyme, Fabrazyme and Myozyme and the inclusion of Aldurazyme sales in our results of operations beginning inon January 1, 2008. As a result of our restructured relationship with BioMarin and BioMarin/Genzyme LLC regarding the manufacturing, marketing and sale of Aldurazyme, effective January 1, 2008, we began to record all sales of Aldurazyme.

        Sales of Cerezyme increased 13%8% to $319.4$309.3 million for the three months ended and 14%12% to $623.7$932.9 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007,2007. This is primarily attributable to our continued identification of new Gaucher disease patients, particularly in international markets. Through October 2007, our price for Cerezyme had remained consistent from period to period. Effective November 1, 2007, weWe implemented a 3% price increase for Cerezyme in the United States in November 2007 and a 4% price increase for Cerezyme.Cerezyme in the United States in August 2008. These price increases accounted for $1.9 million for the three months ended and $9.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of the additional Cerezyme revenue. Although we expect Cerezyme to continue to be a substantial contributor to our total revenues in the future, it is a mature product and as a result, we do not expect that the current new patient growth trend willto continue. The strengthening of foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, against the U.S. dollar, positively impacted Cerezyme revenue by $19.2$11.9 million for the three months ended and $36.5$48.3 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007.

        Sales of Fabrazyme increased 21%20% to $126.6$125.6 million for the three months ended and 19% to $243.1$368.7 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, is primarily attributabledue to increased patient identification worldwide as Fabrazyme is introduced into new markets. We implemented a 3% price increase for Fabrazyme in the United States in November 2007 which did not haveand a significant impact on4% price increase for Fabrazyme revenuein the United States in August 2008. These price increases accounted for $2.2 million for the three and six months ended


Table and $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 of Contents


June 30, 2008.the additional Fabrazyme revenue. The strengthening of foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, against the U.S. dollar, positively impacted Fabrazyme revenue by $8.3$4.4 million for the three months ended and $15.8by $20.3 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007.


        Sales of Myozyme were $77.2increased 43% to $76.7 million for the three months ended and $144.560% to $221.2 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to $46.7$53.6 million and $84.7$138.2 million for the same periods of 2007. We launched Myozyme in the United States in May 2006, in Europe a month later and in Canada in September 2006. We are introducing Myozyme on a country-by-country basis in the European Union, as pricing and reimbursement approvals are obtained. Myozyme has received orphan drug designation in both the United States, which provides seven years of market exclusivity, and in the European Union, which provides ten years of market exclusivity. In April 2007, Myozyme was approved for commercial sale in Japan and subsequently, in June 2007, we launched the product uponin Japan after receipt of marketing and reimbursement approval.approvals. We expect to file for approval in several additional countries inby the second halfend of 2008. The strengthening of foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, against the U.S. dollar, positively impacted Myozyme revenue by $4.5$3.4 million for the three months ended and $7.9$11.4 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007.

        We currently manufacture Myozyme (alglucosidase alfa) in the United States at the 160 liter bioreactor, or 160L, scale at our manufacturing facility in Framingham, Massachusetts and at the 2000L scale at our manufacturing facility in Allston, Massachusetts. We have begun Myozyme fill-finish at our 2000L facility in Waterford, Ireland. We have approval to sell Myozyme manufactured at the 160L scale in the United States and Myozyme produced at the 2000L scale has been approved for sale in more than 40 countries outside the United States.

        In October 2007, we submitted an application to the FDA seeking approval of Myozymealglucosidase alfa produced at the 2000L scale to meet the expected demand for the product in the U.S. market going forward. In April 2008, the FDA concluded that Myozymealglucosidase alfa produced at the 160L scale and at the 2000L scale should be classified as two different products because of differences in the carbohydrate structures of the molecules. As a result, the FDA has required us to submit a separate Biologics License Application, or BLA, to gain U.S. approval for alglucosidase alfa (Myozyme) produced at the 2000L scale. The FDA proposed that we initiate a rolling BLA review process by submitting results from our Late Onset Treatment Study, or LOTS study, for Myozyme because the Myozyme used in that study was produced at the 2000L scale. We had already been in the process of preparing the results of that study for submission to the FDA to fulfill a post-marketing commitment. The LOTS study, which met its co-primary efficacy endpoints, was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of Myozyme in juvenile and adult patients with Pompe disease. In May 2008, we submitted the BLA for alglucosidase alfa (Myozyme) produced at the 2000L scale to the FDA. In October 2008, the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee affirmed by a vote of 16 to 1 that our Late Onset Treatment Study, or LOTS study, established the clinical effectiveness of alglucosidase alfa produced at the 2000L scale. We expect the FDA to give the BLA priority review and to act on the applicationBLA by the end ofNovember 29, 2008. We anticipate that this process will culminate in the availability of two commercial versions of Myozymealglucosidase alfa in the United States: one produced at the 160L scale and the other produced at the 2000L scale. ThisThe decision by the FDA to treat alglucosidase alfa produced using the 160L and 2000L scale processes as separate products will negatively impact our anticipated 2008 Myozyme revenue growth by approximately $45 million and becausesince we will continue to provide Myozyme at no cost to some patients through a clinical access program, we anticipate that costs related to Myozyme in 2008 will be approximately $8-$10$8 to $10 million more than originally expected. We expect demand for Myozyme to continue to grow and expect to begin providing U.S. patients with commercial 2000L product during the first quarter of 2009. In the meantime, we are continuing our efforts to optimize supply for the U.S. market.

        To meet the global demand for Myozyme, we are working to secure approval from the EMEA to produce Myozyme at our 4000 liter bioreactor, or 4000L scale manufacturing facility in Belgium. We are conductinghave successfully completed the required three consecutive process validation runs for Myozyme produced at the 4000L scale whichand we expect to complete in 2008 and subsequently file for EMEA approval. We expect European authorities will approve Myozyme production atapproval of the 4000L scale at our Belgium manufacturing facilityproduction in January 2009. We anticipate EMEA approval during the first half of 2009.


Table Approval of Contents


4000L scale production will be necessary to meet the anticipated global demand for Myozyme. Product supply of Myozyme in 2009 is expected to be particularlyremain tight until production at the 4000L scale at this facilityprocess is approved.

        Effective January 1, 2008, we, BioMarin and BioMarin/Genzyme LLC restructured our relationship regarding the manufacturing, marketing and sale of Aldurazyme and entered into several new agreements. BioMarin will continuecontinues to manufacture Aldurazyme. We will continue to purchase Aldurazyme exclusively from BioMarin and globally market and sell the product. Effective January 1, 2008, instead of sharing all costs and profits of Aldurazyme equally, we began to record all sales of Aldurazyme and



began paying BioMarin a tiered payment ranging from approximately 39.5% to 50% of worldwide net product sales of Aldurazyme. Aldurazyme product revenue was $38.7$38.2 million for the three months ended and $75.5$113.7 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008. Prior to January 1, 2008, we were commercializing Aldurazyme on behalf of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC we were commercializing Aldurazyme in the United States, Canada, the European Union, Latin America and the Asia-Pacific regions and continuing to launch Aldurazyme on a country-by-country basis as pricing and reimbursement approvals were obtained. BioMarin/Genzyme LLC's Aldurazyme product revenue recorded by BioMarin/Genzyme LLC was $29.1$32.3 million for the three months ended and $55.9$88.3 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2007. We implemented a 3% price increase for Aldurazyme in the United States in November 2007 and a 4% price increase for Aldurazyme in the United States in August 2008, which did not have a significant impact on Aldurazyme revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. The increaseincreases in Aldurazyme sales of $9.5$5.9 million for the three months ended and $19.6$25.5 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, are primarily attributable to increased patient identification worldwide as Aldurazyme was introduced into new markets. We have applications for marketing approval for Aldurazyme currently pending in several countries in Latin America, Central and Eastern Europe and the Asia-Pacific regions.

        Salesregion. The strengthening of Thyrogen increased 34% to $39.4foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, against the U.S. dollar, positively impacted Aldurazyme revenue by $1.7 million for the three months ended and 31% to $73.2$6.6 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007.

        Sales of Thyrogen increased 42% to $38.2 million for the three months ended and 35% to $111.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007. We implemented a 9.7% price increases of approximately 10%increase for Thyrogen in the United States in April 2007 and a 15% price increase for Thyrogen in the United States in March 20082008. These price increases accounted for additional revenue of $2.8$3.1 million for the three months ended and $4.2$7.3 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 whileof additional Thyrogen revenue. In addition, worldwide volume growth, driven by a significant increase in the use of the product in thyroid remnant ablation procedures, positively impacted salesThyrogen revenue by $5.9$8.3 million for the three months ended and $10.0$18.3 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008. The strengthening of foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, against the U.S. dollar, positively impacted Thyrogen revenue by $2.0$0.9 million for the three months ended and $3.9by $4.8 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007. In December 2007 we received FDA approval for the use of Thyrogen in thyroid cancer remnant ablation procedures.

Transplant

        Transplant product revenue increased 10%12% to $47.8$47.9 million for the three months ended and 11% to $93.8$141.6 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007. This was primarily due to a $4.3$2.1 million increase for the three months ended and a $9.7$13.7 million increase for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 in Thymoglobulin revenue as a result of an 11% increase in the worldwide average sales price of Thymoglobulin. In addition, sales of Thymoglobulin increased $2.7$2.8 million for the three months ended and $4.0$4.9 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, due to an increase in sales volume resulting from increased utilization of Thymoglobulin in transplant procedures worldwide. The strengthening of foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, against the U.S. dollar, positively impacted Transplant product revenue by $1.1 million for the three months ended and $5.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007.

        In March 2008 we recalled one lot, and in April 2008 we recalled an additional three lots, and in September 2008 we recalled one other lot of Thymoglobulin that no longer met our specifications for product appearance. The value of the product returned as a result of these recalls was not significant. We expect to recall additional lots this year for the same reason, although most of the product will likely be consumed prior to a recall being necessary. In July 2008, we wrote off one lot of Thymoglobulin, valued at approximately $5 million, due to a filter failure at our fill-finish facility in Waterford, Ireland. We will continue to closely monitor our Thymoglobulin inventory levels and have increased production in an effort to maintain adequate supply


Table of Contents


levels throughout the remainder of 2008. We have begun construction ofConstruction is underway on a new manufacturing plant for Thymoglobulin in Lyon, France to support the anticipated long-term growthdemand for the product. Regulatory approvals of the product.facility are expected beginning in 2010, and production at this plant is expected to commence in 2011.

Biosurgery

        Biosurgery product revenue increased 21%19% to $119.1$112.4 million for the three months ended and 18% to $219.4$331.8 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007. Seprafilm revenue increased $8.2$6.7 million for the three months ended and $14.9$21.6 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, primarily due to greater penetration of the product into the United States, Japanese and European markets.markets and expanded use of Seprafilm in C-sections and gynecological procedures. The strengthening of foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, against the U.S. dollar, positively impacted Biosurgery product revenue by $1.5 million for the three months ended and $6.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007.

        We received approval to market Synvisc-One, a single injection regimen, in the European Union in December 2007. In November 2007, we received a letter from the FDA requesting additional analysis and data regarding our marketing application for Synvisc-One in the United States. We responded to the FDA's letter in June 2008 and we currently expect regulatory action on our marketing application will be the subject of an FDA advisory committee meeting in December when the panel is expected to discuss the clinical data we submitted to support the approval and labeling of the product. The FDA is expected to act on the application by the end ofDecember 23, 2008. We also plan on pursuing marketing approvals for Synvisc-One in Canada, Asia and Latin America.

        The combined revenues of Synvisc/Synvisc-One increased 9%10% to $70.9$67.5 million for the three months ended and 7%8% to $127.1$194.6 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, primarily due to an expanded sales and marketing investment and the initiation of direct sales of the product in Latin America.

        Other Biosurgery product revenue increased 60%67% to $13.4$11.9 million for the three months ended and 42%49% to $27.0$38.8 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, primarily due to $4.6$2.0 million of revenue for the three months ended and $7.1$8.3 million of revenue for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, related to a dermal filler we are developing with and manufacturing for sale to Mentor Corporation or Mentor.for which there were no comparable amounts in the same periods of 2007.

Oncology

        Oncology product revenue increased 78%60% to $25.9$25.8 million for the three months ended and 54%56% to $48.2$74.0 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, primarily due to the addition of sales of Clolarclofarabine outside of North America, which rights we acquired in connection with our acquisition of Bioenvision in October 2007. Clofarabine, which is approved for the treatment of relapsed or refractory pediatric ALL, is marketed under the name Clolar in North and South America and as Evoltra elsewhere in the world.

        We are developing the intravenous formulation of clofarabine for new indications, including first-line and relapsed or refractory adult AML. We expect to submit a supplemental BLA this year to expand Clolar's U.S. labeling to include adult AML. FDA action is expected by the middle of 2009. A similar submission in Europe is expected during the first half of 2009. We are also developing an oral formulation of clofarabine and have initiated clinical trials for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome, or MDS. Clofarabine has been granted orphan drug status for the treatment of ALL and AML in both the United States and the European Union.


        In September 2007, the FDA approved expanded labeling for Campath to include first-line treatment of patients with B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia, or B-CLL, significantly increasing the number of patients eligible to receive the product. In December 2007, we received European approval for this expanded indication as well.

        We are developing the intravenous formulation of Clolar for significantly larger indications, including first-line and relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia, or AML, in adults. We are also developing an oral formulation of Clolar and have initiated clinical trials for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome, or MDS. Clolar has been granted orphan drug status for the treatment of ALL and AML in both the United States and European Union.

Other Product Revenue

        Other product revenue increased 29%17% to $67.8$68.1 million for the three months ended and 25%22% to $139.2$207.3 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, primarily due to:


Table of Contents

Service Revenue

        We derive service revenue primarily from the following sources:


        The following table sets forth our service revenue on a segment basis (amounts in thousands):



 Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 


 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 


 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Therapeutics

Therapeutics

 $167 $ N/A $343 $ N/A 

Therapeutics

 $ $ N/A $343 $ N/A 

Biosurgery

Biosurgery

 11,298 8,338 36% 22,030 17,700 24%

Biosurgery

 9,928 9,786 1% 31,958 27,486 16%

Genetics

Genetics

 78,534 73,714 7% 152,863 139,872 9%

Genetics

 82,058 73,050 12% 234,921 212,922 10%

Oncology

Oncology

 424 346 23% 834 628 33%

Oncology

 424 269 58% 1,258 897 40%

Other

Other

 199 77 >100% 416 156 >100%

Other

 176 72 >100% 592 228 >100%
                           

Total service revenue

 $90,622 $82,475 10%$176,486 $158,356 11%

Total service revenue

 $92,586 $83,177 11%$269,072 $241,533 11%
                           

        Service revenue attributable to our Biosurgery reporting segment increased 36%1% to $11.3$9.9 million for the three months ended and 24%16% to $22.0$32.0 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007. The increases were primarily due to higher demand for Epicel and MACI.

        Service revenue attributable to our Genetics reporting segment increased 7%12% to $78.5$82.1 million for the three months ended and 9%10% to $152.9$234.9 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007. The increases were primarily attributable to continued growth in revenue from our genetic testing and prenatal screening services and the increase in demand for certain testing services for patients diagnosed with cancer.

        The strengthening of foreign currencies against the U.S. dollar for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, did not have a significant impact on service revenue.


Table of Contents

International Product and Service Revenue

        A substantial portion of our revenue is generated outside of the United States. The following table provides information regarding the change in international product and service revenue as a percentage of total product and service revenue during the periods presented (amounts in thousands):


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
  
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 

 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
  Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 

 2008 2007 2008 2007  2008 2007 2008 2007 

International product and service revenue

 $623,237 $439,897 42%$1,187,364 $850,916 40% $578,744 $451,881 28%$1,770,426 $1,302,797 36%

% of total product and service revenue

 54% 47%   53% 47%    50% 48%   52% 47%   

        The 42%28% increase, to $623.2$578.7 million, in international product and service revenue for the three months ended and the 40%36% increase, to $1.2$1.8 billion, for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, is primarily due to an $107.7a $68.5 million increase for the three month periodmonths ended and a $197.3$265.7 million increase for the six month periodnine months ended September 30, 2008 in the combined international sales of Renagel, Cerezyme, Fabrazyme and Myozyme, primarily due to an increase in the number of patients using these products in the European Union, South America and the Asia-Pacific rim. In addition, duein 2008 we began to record worldwide Aldurazyme revenue and revenue for clofarabine sold outside North America. Due to the restructured relationship with BioMarin/Genzyme LLC, we began to record Aldurazyme revenue effective January 1, 2008. Revenue generated outside the United States for Aldurazyme was $31.5$30.3 million for the three months ended and $61.2$91.5 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, which had been recorded as joint venture revenue by



BioMarin/Genzyme LLC in 2007. In October 2007, as a result of our acquisition of Bioenvision, we began selling Clolar/Evoltra for the treatment of relapsed or refractory pediatric ALL outside of North America. Revenue generated outside the United States for Clolar/Evoltra was $8.5 million for the three months ended and $21.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. There were no comparable amounts for the same periods of 2007.

        International product and service revenue as a percentage of total product and service revenue increased due primarily to the addition of revenue generated outside the United States for Aldurazyme and clofarabine. We began recording clofarabine revenue outside the United States as a result of our acquisition of Bioenvision in October 2007, which provided us with the exclusive, worldwide rights to clofarabine.

        The strengthening of foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, against the U.S. dollar, primarily the Euro, positively impacted total product and service revenue by $51.9$30.7 million for the three months ended and $98.5$129.2 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007.

Research and Development Revenue

        The following table sets forth our research and development revenue on a segment basis (amounts in thousands):



 Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 


 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 


 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Therapeutics

Therapeutics

 $26 $431 (94)%$45 $1,069 (96)%

Therapeutics

 $11 $121 (91)%$56 $1,190 (95)%

Transplant

Transplant

   N/A  180 (100)%

Transplant

   N/A  180 (100)%

Biosurgery

Biosurgery

 818 1,226 (33)% 1,421 2,974 (52)%

Biosurgery

 661 1,697 (61)% 2,082 4,671 (55)%

Oncology

Oncology

 6,961 2,510 >100% 13,318 7,980 67%

Oncology

 7,726 6,330 22% 21,044 14,310 47%

Other

Other

 464 896 (48)% 1,031 1,669 (38)%

Other

 625 686 (9)% 1,656 2,355 (30)%

Corporate

Corporate

 442 399 11% 825 702 18%

Corporate

 379 466 (19)% 1,204 1,168 3%
                           

Total research and development revenue

 $8,711 $5,462 59%$16,640 $14,574 14%

Total research and development revenue

 $9,402 $9,300 1%$26,042 $23,874 9%
                           

Table of Contents

        Total research and development revenue increased by $3.2$0.1 million for the three months ended and $2.1$2.2 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, primarily due to increases in revenue recognized by our Oncology reporting segment due to higher development activity for Campath,alemtuzumab under our collaboration with Bayer, particularly in the multiple sclerosis development program.


MARGINS

        The components of our total margins are described in the following table (amounts in thousands):


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
  
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 

 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
  Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 

 2008 2007 2008 2007  2008 2007 2008 2007 

Product margin

 $830,458 $682,230 22%$1,619,987 $1,325,696 22% $832,605 $677,207 23%$2,452,592 $2,002,903 22%

% of total product revenue

 77% 81%   78% 81%    79% 78%   78% 80%   

Service margin

 $31,635 $28,129 12%$61,925 $56,271 10% $33,069 $29,040 14%$94,994 $85,311 11%

% of total service revenue

 35% 34%   35% 36%    36% 35%   35% 35%   

Total product and service margin

 $862,093 $710,359 21%$1,681,912 $1,381,967 22% $865,674 $706,247 23%$2,547,586 $2,088,214 22%

% of total product and service revenue

 74% 77%   75% 77%    75% 74%   75% 76%   

Product Margin

        Our overall product margin increased $148.2$155.4 million, or 22%23%, for the three months ended and $294.3$449.7 million, or 22%, for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007. This is primarily due to:

        These increases in product margin were partially offset by the unfavorableThere was also a $31.9 million favorable effect of exchange rates of $10.3 million for the three months ended and $19.8$110.6 million for the sixnine months ended June 30, 2008 due to the weakening of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies, primarily the Euro.

        Total product margin as a percentage of total product revenue for the three and six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, due to the strengthening of foreign currencies, primarily the Euro, against the U.S. dollar.

        Total product margin as a percentage of product revenue increased for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, due to a decrease in manufacturing-related charges recorded to write off finished lots of Thymoglobulin that did not meet product specifications for saleable product from $11.8 million recorded in September 2007 to $4.8 million recorded in September 2008. Total product margin as a percentage of product revenue decreased for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, due to the increase in sales of Myozyme and the addition of Aldurazyme to the results, both of which have lower than average margins, and to higher unit costs for Cerezyme and Fabrazyme.Fabrazyme, offset by the decrease in manufacturing-related charges recorded.


        For purposes of this discussion, the amortization of product related intangible assets is included in amortization expense and, as a result, is excluded from cost of products sold and the determination of product margins.


Table of Contents

Service Margin

        Our overall service margin increased $3.5$4.0 million, or 12%14%, for the three months ended and $5.7$9.7 million, or 10%11%, for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007. The increases were primarily attributable to increases in revenuesrevenue from our genetic testing and prenatal screening services.services and the increase in demand for certain testing services for patients diagnosed with cancer.

        Total service margin as a percent of total service revenue increased by 1% for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, due to an increase in EpicelMACI and Carticel revenue. Total service margin as a percent of total service revenue decreased by 1%was consistent for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 as compared to the same period of 2007, primarily due to an increase in Carticel and MACI unit costs.2007.

OPERATING EXPENSES

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

        Effective January 1, 2008, as a result of changes in how we review our business, certain general and administrative expenses which were formerly allocated amongst our reporting segments and Other, are now allocated to Corporate. We have revised our 2007 segment disclosures to conform to our 2008 presentation.

        The following table provides information regarding the change in SG&A during the periods presented (amounts in thousands):


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
  
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 

 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
  Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 

 2008 2007 2008 2007  2008 2007 2008 2007 

Selling, general and administrative expenses

 $347,305 $339,480 2%$665,691 $608,501 9% $331,170 $270,306 23%$996,861 $878,807 13%

% of total revenue

 30% 36%   29% 33%    29% 28%   29% 32%   

        SG&A increased by $7.8$60.9 million for the three months ended and $57.2$118.1 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, primarily due to spending increases of:




Table of Contents


        These increases were partially offset by a decrease in SG&A for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 for Corporate because we recorded a $64.0 million charge in June 2007 for the settlement of the litigation related to the consolidation of our former tracking stocks for which there was no comparable amount recorded in 2008.

Research and Development Expenses

        The following table provides information regarding the change in research and development expenses during the periods presented (amounts in thousands):


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
  
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 

 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
  Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 

 2008 2007 2008 2007  2008 2007 2008 2007 

Research and development expenses

 $381,861 $198,442 92%$644,658 $364,562 77% $305,242 $175,800 74%$949,900 $540,362 76%

% of total revenue

 33% 21%   28% 20%    26% 18%   28% 19%   

        Research and development expenses increased $183.4$129.4 million for the three months ended and $280.1$409.5 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, primarily due to:



Table of Contents

        These increases were partially offset by spending decreases of:


Amortization of Intangibles

        The following table provides information regarding the change in amortization of intangibles expense during the periods presented (amounts in thousands):


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
  
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 

 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
  Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 

 2008 2007 2008 2007  2008 2007 2008 2007 

Amortization of intangibles

 $55,605 $49,465 12%$111,263 $99,482 12% $55,295 $49,819 11%$166,558 $149,301 12%

% of total revenue

 5% 5%   5% 5%    5% 5%   5% 5%   

        Amortization of intangibles expense increased by $6.1$5.5 million for the three months ended and $11.8$17.3 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007, primarily due to the acquisition of technology in connection with our acquisition of Bioenvision in October 2007 and the acquisition of customer lists and trademarks in connection with our acquisition of thecertain diagnostic assets offrom DCL in December 2007.

        As discussed in Note 8., "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," to our consolidated financial statements included in this report, we calculate amortization expense for the Synvisc sales and marketing rights we reacquired from Wyeth and the Myozyme patent and technology rights pursuant to a licensing agreement with Synpac by taking into account forecasted future sales of the products, and the resulting estimated future contingent payments we will be required to make. As a result, we expect amortization of intangibles expense to fluctuate over the next five years based on these future contingent payments.

Purchase of In-Process Research and Development

        We did not complete any acquisitions in the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008. In connection with certain of our acquisitions we completed between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007, we have


Table of Contents


have acquired various IPR&D projects. The following table sets forth IPR&D projects for companies and certain assets we have acquired between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2007 (amounts in millions):

Company/Assets Acquired
 Purchase
Price
 IPR&D Programs Acquired Discount Rate
Used in
Estimating
Cash
Flows
 Year of
Expected
Launch
 Estimated
Cost to
Complete
 
Company Acquired
 Purchase
Price
 IPR&D Programs Acquired Discount Rate
Used in
Estimating
Cash
Flows
 Year of
Expected
Launch
 Estimated
Cost to
Complete
 

Bioenvision (2007)

 $349.9 $125.5 

Evoltra (clofarabine)(1,2)

 17% 2008-2010 $41  $349.9 $125.5 

Clolar/Evoltra (clofarabine)(1,2)

 17% 2009-2013 $35.3 
      

AnorMED (2006)

 $589.2 $526.8 

Mozobil (stem cell transplant)(3)

 15% 2009-2014 $125  $589.2 $526.8 

Mozobil (stem cell transplant)(3)

 15% 2009-2014 $125 

   26.1 

AMD070 (HIV)(4)

 15%  $    26.1 

AMD070 (HIV)(4)

 15%  $ 
      

   $552.9    $552.9       
      

(1)
IPR&D charges totaled $125.5 million related to the acquisition of Bioenvision, of which $106.4 million was charged to IPR&D and $19.1 million was charged to equity in income (loss) of equity method investments.

(2)
Clofarabine, which is approved for the treatment of relapsed and refractory pediatric ALL, is marketed under the name Clolar in North and South America and as Evoltra elsewhere in the world. The IPR&D projects for Clolarclofarabine are related to the development of these productsthe product for the treatment of other medical diseases.

(3)
In June 2008, we submitted marketing applications for Mozobil in the United States and Europe. We expect to launch Mozobil in those regions during the first half of 2009, following regulatory approval.

(4)
Year of expected launch and estimated cost to complete data is not provided for AMD070 at this time because we are assessing our future plans for this program.

OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES



 Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
 
 
Three Months Ended
September 30,
  
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30,
  
 


 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 Increase/
(Decrease)
% Change
 


 2008 2007 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 


 (Amounts in thousands)
 
 (Amounts in thousands)
 

Equity in income of equity method investments

 $ $5,945 (100)%$188 $11,557 (98)%

Equity in income (loss) of equity method investments

Equity in income (loss) of equity method investments

 $ $(12,648) (100)%$188 $(1,091) >(100)%

Minority interest

Minority interest

 563 15 >100% 1,026 3,927 (74)%

Minority interest

 566 5 >100% 1,592 3,932 (60)%

Gains on investments in equity securities, net

 9,153 143 >100% 9,928 12,931 (23)%

Gains (losses) on investments in equity securities, net

Gains (losses) on investments in equity securities, net

 (14,129) 1,105 >(100)% (4,201) 14,036 >(100)%

Other

Other

 19 (278) >(100)% (141) (803) (82)%

Other

 (699) 913 >(100)% (840) 110 >(100)%

Investment income

Investment income

 13,352 17,246 (23)% 28,222 33,465 (16)%

Investment income

 11,793 18,222 (35)% 40,015 51,687 (23)%

Interest expense

Interest expense

 (1,149) (3,621) (68)% (2,804) (7,809) (64)%

Interest expense

 (792) (1,474) (46)% (3,596) (9,283) (61)%
                           

Total other income

 $21,938 $19,450 13%$36,419 $53,268 (32)%

Total other income (expenses)

 $(3,261)$6,123 >(100)%$33,158 $59,391 (44)%
                           

Equity in Income (Loss) of Equity Method Investments

        Under this caption, we record our portion of the results of our joint venture with Medtronic, Inc., or Medtronic, and our investment in Peptimmune, Inc., or Peptimmune, and for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2007, our portion of the results of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC. Also under this caption, for the period from July 10, 2007 through September 30, 2007, we recorded our portion of the results of our investment in Bioenvision, which we subsequently acquired in October 2007.


        Equity in incomeloss of equity method investments decreased by $12.6 million, or 100%, for the three months ended and 98%$1.3 million, or more than 100%, for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same periods of 2007,2007. These decreases are primarily due to $20.5 million of charges in the restructuringthree months ended September 30, 2007 related to our investment in Bioenvision common stock, including a $19.1 million charge for IPR&D, representing our proportionate share of the relationship withfair value of the IPR&D programs of Bioenvision for which there are no comparable amounts in the same periods of 2008 because we completed our acquisition of Bioenvision in October 2007. These charges were offset in part by our portion of the net income from BioMarin/Genzyme LLC. BeginningLLC of $8.2 million for the three months ended and $20.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, for which there are no comparable amounts in the same periods of 2008, since, beginning January 1, 2008, as a result of our restructured relationship with BioMarin, we no longer account for BioMarin/Genzyme LLC using the equity method of accounting.


Table of Contents

Minority Interest

        As a result of the restructuring of our relationship with BioMarin/Genzyme LLC, effective January 1, 2008, in accordance with the provisions of FIN 46R, we began consolidating the results of BioMarin/Genzyme LLC. We recorded BioMarin's portion of this joint venture's income for the three and sixnine months ended as of JuneSeptember 30, 2008 as minority interest in our consolidated statementstatements of operations, for that period, the amounts of which were not significant.

        As a result of our application of FIN 46R, prior to October 15, 2007, we consolidated the results of Excigen Inc., or Excigen, and, prior to February 20, 2007, Dyax-Genzyme LLC. On February 20, 2007, we agreed with Dyax to terminate our participation and interest in Dyax-Genzyme LLC. We recorded Dyax's portion of this joint venture's losses as minority interest in our consolidated statements of operations through February 20, 2007. The results of Excigen were not significant for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 and 2007.

Gains (Losses) on Investments in Equity Securities, Net

        We recorded the following gains (losses) on investments in equity securities, net of charges for impairment of investments, duringfor the periods presented (amounts in thousands):

 
 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Gross gains on investments in equity securities:

             
 

Sirtris

 $10,304 $ $10,304 $ 
 

THP

        10,848 
 

Other

  138  143  913  2,083 
          
  

Total

  10,442  143  11,217  12,931 

Less: charge for impairment of investment

  (1,289)   (1,289)  
          

Gains on investments in equity securities, net

 $9,153 $143 $9,928 $12,931 
          
 
 Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 
 
 2008 2007 2008 2007 

Gross gains (losses) on investments in equity securities:

             
 

Sirtris

 $ $ $10,304 $ 
 

THP

  1,042    1,042  10,848 
 

Other

  (9,861) 1,105  (8,948) 3,188 
          
  

Total

  (8,819) 1,105  2,398  14,036 

Less: charges for impairment of investments

  (5,310)   (6,599)  
          

Gains (losses) on investments in equity securities, net

 $(14,129)$1,105 $(4,201)$14,036 
          

        In the fourth quarter of 2007, we purchased an exclusive option to acquire equity of a private company for $10.0 million in cash. We terminated the option agreement prior to the deadline for exercise and, as a result, we recorded a charge of $10.0 million in the third quarter of 2008 to write off the purchase price of the option. We also recorded a charge of $5.3 million in the third quarter of 2008 to write down our investments in certain venture capital funds to fair value.

        In the second quarter of 2008, we recorded a $10.3 million gain resulting from the liquidation of our investment in the common stock of Sirtris for net cash proceeds of $14.8 million.


        In March 2007, we recorded a $10.8 million gain in connection with the sale of our entire investment in the capital stock of THP, which had a zero cost basis, for net cash proceeds of $10.8 million.

        At JuneSeptember 30, 2008, our stockholders' equity includes $28.8$32.7 million of unrealized gains and $2.6$0.1 million of unrealized losses related to our strategic investments in equity securities.

Investment Income

        Our investment income decreased 23%35% to $13.4$11.8 million for the three months ended and 16%23% to $28.2$40.0 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to $17.2$18.2 million and $33.5$51.7 million for the same periods of 2007, primarily due to a decrease in our average portfolio yield and lower balances for international cash, partially offset by higher domestic average cash balances.in each period.

Interest Expense

        Our interest expense decreased 68%46% to $1.1$0.8 million for the three months ended and 64%61% to $2.8$3.6 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to $3.6$1.5 million and $7.8$9.3 million for the same periods of 2007, primarily due to a $1.2$1.5 million decreaseincrease in capitalized interest expense for the three months ended and $2.6$3.9 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 20082008. In addition, there was a $1.7 million decrease in interest expense related to asset retirement


Table of Contents


obligations and a $1.3 million increase forin the threenine months ended and $2.4 million for the six months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, in capitalized interest.as compared to the same period of 2007.

Provision for Income Taxes


 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  Three Months Ended
September 30,
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 

 2008 2007 2008 2007  2008 2007 2008 2007 

 (Amounts in thousands)
  (Amounts in thousands)
 

Provision for income taxes

 $38,407 $64,090 $98,524 $135,283  $60,512 $66,432 $159,036 $201,715 

Effective tax rate

 36% 43% 31% 36% 34% 29% 32% 33%

        Our effective tax rate for all periods presented varies from the U.S. statutory tax rate as a result of:

        In addition, during the three months ended September 30, 2008, we recorded net tax benefits of $10.1 million, principally related to a change in our estimate of the amount of foreign production income in the prior year. Our effective tax rate for the three and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 was also impacted by the settlement of IRS audits for the tax years 2004 to 2005. WeDuring the first half of 2008, we recorded a $4.3total of $5.1 million of tax benefitbenefits to our income tax provision reflecting the settlement of various issues. In conjunction with those settlements, we reduced our tax reserves by $4.9 million and recorded current and deferred tax benefits for the remaining portion of the settlement amounts.


        We are currently under IRS audit for the tax years 2006 to 2007 and various states for the tax years 1999 to 2005. We believe that we have provided sufficiently for all audit exposures. Settlement of these audits or the expiration of the statute of limitations on the assessment of income taxes for any tax year may result in an adjustment of future tax provisions. Any such adjustment would be recorded upon the effective settlement of the audit or expiration of the applicable statute of limitations.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

        We continue to generate cash from operations. We had cash, cash equivalents and short- and long-term investments of $1.25$1.47 billion at Juneboth September 30, 2008 and $1.46 billion at December 31, 2007.

        The following is a summary of our statements of cash flows for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 and 2007.


Table of Contents

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

        Cash flows from operating activities are as follows (amounts in thousands):



 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 


 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 

Cash flows from operating activities:

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

 

Net income

Net income

 $214,835 $241,981 

Net income

 $334,431 $401,294 

Non-cash charges

Non-cash charges

 241,953 196,810 

Non-cash charges

 238,757 318,351 

Decrease in cash from working capital changes (excluding impact of acquired assets and assumed liabilities)

Decrease in cash from working capital changes (excluding impact of acquired assets and assumed liabilities)

 (277,480) (62,623)

Decrease in cash from working capital changes (excluding impact of acquired assets and assumed liabilities)

 (139,123) (108,818)
           

Cash flows from operating activities

 $179,308 $376,168 

Cash flows from operating activities

 $434,065 $610,827 
           

        Cash provided by operating activities decreased $196.9by $176.8 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, primarily driven by by:

        The net increasedecrease in non-cash charges for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to the same period of 2007, is primarily attributable to:
to an increase in deferred income tax benefits of $154.7 million, offset by:


Cash Flows from Investing Activities

        Cash flows from investing activities are as follows (amounts in thousands):

 
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 
 2008 2007 

Cash flows from investing activities:

       

Net sales of investments, excluding investments in equity securities

 $30,629 $84,919 

Net purchases of investments in equity securities

  (65,303) (668)

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

  (251,785) (180,041)

Distributions from equity method investments

  6,595  10,900 

Purchases of other intangible assets

  (75,400) (27,618)

Other investing activities

  2,572  891 
      
 

Cash flows from investing activities

 $(352,692)$(111,617)
      

For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, net purchases of investments in equity securities, purchases of other intangible assets, and capital expenditures and settlement of the appraisal demand with



substantially all of the Bioenvision dissenters accounted for significant cash outlays for investing activities. During the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, we used:


Table of Contents

These cash outlays were partially offset by $16.2$16.5 million of net cash proceeds from the sale of investments in equity securities and $6.6 million of cash distributions from BioMarin/Genzyme LLC.securities.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

        Cash flows from financing activities are as follows (amounts in thousands):



 Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 Nine Months Ended
September 30,
 


 2008 2007 
 2008 2007 

Cash flows from financing activities:

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

Cash flows from financing activities:

 

Proceeds from issuance of our common stock

Proceeds from issuance of our common stock

 $127,008 $68,174 

Proceeds from issuance of our common stock

 $294,603 $100,276 

Repurchases of our common stock

Repurchases of our common stock

 (143,012) (63,430)

Repurchases of our common stock

 (143,012) (181,210)

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

 8,647 565 

Excess tax benefits from stock-based compensation

 17,470 1,229 

Payments of debt and capital lease obligations

Payments of debt and capital lease obligations

 (3,886) (3,356)

Payments of debt and capital lease obligations

 (5,281) (4,606)

Increase in bank overdrafts

Increase in bank overdrafts

 29,309 15,935 

Increase in bank overdrafts

 20,889 19,259 

Payments of notes receivable from stockholders

Payments of notes receivable from stockholders

 2,770  

Payments of notes receivable from stockholders

 2,770  

Minority interest contributions

Minority interest contributions

  4,136 

Minority interest contributions

 1,244 4,136 

Other financing activities

Other financing activities

 34 2,474 

Other financing activities

 (1,160) 3,525 
           

Cash flows from financing activities

 $20,870 $24,498 

Cash flows from financing activities

 $187,523 $(57,391)
           

        In May 2007, our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to an aggregate maximum amount of $1.5 billion or 20,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock over three years, beginning in June 2007. The repurchases are being made from time to time and can be effectuated through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, transactions structured through investment banking institutions, or by other means, subject to management's discretion and as permitted by securities laws and other legal requirements. During the sixthree months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, we did not repurchase any shares of our common stock under our stock repurchase program. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we repurchased an additional 2,000,000 shares of our common stock at an average price of $71.49 per share for a total of $143.0 million in cash, including fees. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, we have repurchased a cumulative total of 5,500,000 shares of our common stock at an average price of $68.09 per share for a total of $374.6 million in cash, including fees.


Revolving Credit Facility

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, no amounts were outstanding under our five year, $350.0 million senior unsecured revolving credit facility.facility, which expires on July 14, 2011. The terms of this credit facility include various covenants, including financial covenants that require us to meet minimum interest coverage ratios and maximum leverage ratios. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, we were in compliance with these covenants.

Contractual Obligations

        The disclosure of payments we have committed to make under our contractual obligations is set forth under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Genzyme Corporation and Subsidiaries' Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources" in Exhibit 13 to our 2007 Form 10-K. As of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, there have been no material changes to our contractual obligations since December 31, 2007 except the following:


Table of Contents

Financial Position

        We believe that our available cash, investments and cash flows from operations will be sufficient to fund our planned operations and capital requirements for the foreseeable future. Although we currently have substantial cash resources and positive cash flow, we have used or intend to use substantial portions of our available cash and may make additional borrowings for:

        Our cash reserves may be further reduced to pay principal and interest on the $690.0 million in principal under our 1.25% convertible senior notes due December 1, 2023. TheWe plan to redeem all $690.0 million in principal of these notes are initially convertible into Genzyme Stock at a conversion price of approximately $71.24 per share. Holders of the notes may require us to repurchase all or any part of the notes for cash, common stock, or a combination, at our option, on December 1, 2008 2013 or 2018, at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of theusing available cash. The notes plus accrued and unpaid interest through the date prior to the date of repurchase. Additionally, upon a change of control, each holder may require us to repurchase, at 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued interest, all or a portion of the holder's notes for cash. On or after December 1, 2008, we may redeemwill be redeemed for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued interest all or partunless they are converted, at the option of the noteholders, into shares of our common stock on or before November 25, 2008, at a conversion price of $71.24 per share. If our common stock is trading below the conversion price on and before November 25, 2008, we expect that the noteholders will choose to redeem their notes that have not been previously converted or repurchased.for cash.


        In addition, we have several outstanding legal proceedings. Involvement in investigations and litigation can be expensive and a court may ultimately require that we pay expenses and damages. As a result of legal proceedings, we may also may be required to pay fees to a holder of proprietary rights in order to continue certain operations.

        To satisfy theseRecently, the general economic, global capital and credit market conditions in the United States and other commitments,parts of the world have deteriorated significantly and have adversely affected access to capital and increased the cost of capital. However, we maycontinue to believe that our available cash, investments and cash flow from operations, together with our revolving credit facility and other available debt financing, will be adequate to meet our operating, investing and financing needs in the foreseeable future. We currently do not rely on short-term borrowing to fund our operations and, as a result, we do not believe that existing global capital and credit market conditions will have a significant impact on our near-term liquidity. We are closely monitoring our liquidity as well as the condition of these markets. If these conditions continue or become worse, our future cost of debt and equity capital and our future access to obtain additional financing.capital markets could be adversely affected. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain any additional financing in the future or extend any existing financing arrangement, or obtain eitherarrangements on favorable terms.terms or at all.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

        We do not use special purpose entities or other off-balance sheet financing arrangements. We enter into guarantees in the ordinary course of business related to the guarantee of our own performance and the performance of our subsidiaries. In addition, we have joint ventures and certain other arrangements that are focused on the research, development and commercialization of products. Entities falling within the scope of FIN 46R are included in our consolidated statements of operations if we qualify as the primary beneficiary. Entities not subject to consolidation under FIN 46R are accounted for under the equity method of accounting if our ownership percent exceeds 20% or if we exercise significant influence over the entity. We account for our portion of the results of these entities in the line item "Equity in income of equity method investments" in our consolidated statements of


Table of Contents


operations. We also acquire companies in which we agree to pay contingent consideration based on attaining certain thresholds.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Adopted in 2008

         FAS 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115."    Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted FAS 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115," which permits, but does not require, entities to irrevocably elect to measure certain financial instruments and other assets and liabilities at fair value on an instrument-by-instrument basis. Unrealizedbasis, with subsequent unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected should be recognized in earnings at each subsequent reporting date.as changes in fair value occur. In adopting FAS 159, we did not elect to measure any new assets or liabilities at their respective fair values and, therefore, the adoption of FAS 159 did not have an impact on our results of operations andor financial position.

         EITF Issue No. 07-1, "Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements."    In December 2007, the Emerging Issues Task Force, or EITF, of the FASB reached a consensus on Issue No. 07-1, "Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements." The EITF concluded on the definition of a collaborative arrangement and that revenues and costs incurred with third parties in connection with collaborative arrangements would be presented gross or net based on the criteria in EITF 99-19 and other accounting literature. Companies are also required to disclose the nature and purpose of collaborative arrangements along with the accounting policies and the classification and amounts of significant financial-statement amounts related to the arrangements. EITF 07-1 will become effective for us January 1, 2009 and will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented for all collaborative arrangements existing as of the effective date. We are evaluating the impact, if any, this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

         EITF Issue No. 07-3, "Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities."    In June 2007, the FASB ratified the EITF consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 07-3, "Accounting for Nonrefundable Advance Payments for Goods or Services Received for Use in Future Research and Development Activities," which provides guidance forrequires that nonrefundable prepaymentsadvanced payments for goods or services that will be used or rendered for future research and development activities and directs that such payments should be deferred and capitalized. Such amounts should be recognized as an expense as the goods are delivered or the related services are performed, or until it is no longer expected that the goods will be delivered or the services rendered. EITF Issue No. 07-3 was effective for us beginning January 1, 2008 and we applied it prospectively to new contracts we entered into on or after that date. The implementation of this standardEITF Issue No. 07-3 did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


         FSP 157-3, "Determining Fair Value of a Financial Asset in a Market That Is Not Active."    In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-3, which clarified how the fair value of a financial asset is determined when the market for that financial asset is inactive. FSP 157-3 was effective upon issuance, including for prior periods for which financial statements had not been issued. The implementation of FSP 157-3 did not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.

Effective in 2009

         EITF Issue No. 07-1, "Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements."    In December 2007, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-1, which defines collaborative arrangements and establishes reporting requirements for transactions between participants in a collaborative arrangement and between participants in the arrangement and third parties, including the appropriate income statement presentation and classification of, and the required disclosures related to, these arrangements. EITF Issue No. 07-1 is effective January 1, 2009 and we will apply it retrospectively to all periods presented for all collaborative arrangements existing as of the effective date. We are evaluating the impact, if any, that EITF Issue No. 07-1 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

         FAS 141 (revised 2007),141R, "Business Combinations."    In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 141 (revised 2007), "Business Combinations," or FAS 141R, which replaces FAS 141, "Business Combinations."141. FAS 141R retains the underlying conceptsfundamental concept of FAS 141 in that all business combinations are still required to be accounted for at fair value under the acquisitionpurchase method of accounting but changes a numberand introduces new requirements for the recognition and measurement of significant aspects of applying this method. Acquisitionassets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests. Under FAS 141R, acquisition costs will generally be expensed as incurred; noncontrolling interestsincurred and restructuring costs will be valued at fair value atexpensed subsequent to the acquisition date;date. IPR&D will be recorded at fair valuecapitalized as an indefinite-lived intangible asset at the acquisition date; restructuring costs associated withdate and will either be amortized over the life of the related product or written off as a business combination will generally be expensed subsequentcharge to earnings if the acquisition date; and changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and income tax uncertainties after the acquisition date generally will affect income tax expense.project is subsequently abandoned or becomes impaired. FAS 141R is effective for us on a prospective basis for all business combinations for which the acquisition date isoccurring on or after January 1, 2009. Early adoption is not permitted. We are currently evaluating the effects if any, that FAS 141R will have on our consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents

         FAS No. 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51."    In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 160, "Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51," which establishes new accounting and reporting standards that require the ownershipfor noncontrolling interests, in subsidiaries not held by the parent to be clearly identified, labeled and presented in the consolidated statement of financial position within equity, but separate from the parent's equity. FAS 160 also requiresformerly known as minority interests, including the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, commonly referredchanges in parent's ownership interest and the valuation of any retained noncontrolling equity investment when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. FAS 160 requires noncontrolling interests to asbe reclassified from the minorityliabilities section or the mezzanine section between liabilities and equity to the equity section of the consolidated balance sheet and to be reported separately from the parent's equity. In addition, FAS 160 requires the results from operations attributed to the noncontrolling interest to be clearly identified and presenteddisclosed separately from those of the parent on the face of the consolidated statement of income. Changes in a parent's ownership interest while the parent retains its controlling financial interest must be accounted for consistently, and when a subsidiary is deconsolidated, any retained noncontrolling equity investment in the former subsidiary must be initially measured at fair value. The gain or loss on the deconsolidation of the subsidiary is measured using the fair value of any noncontrolling equity investment. FAS 160 also requires entities to provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owners.operations. FAS 160 is effective for us January 1, 2009 and adoption is prospective only. However, upon adoption, presentation and disclosure requirements described above must be applied retrospectively for all periods presented in our consolidated financial statements. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that FAS 160 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

         FSP No. 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157."    In accordance withFebruary 2008, the provisions ofFASB issued FSP No. 157-2, "Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157," we electedwhich allowed us to defer the implementation of FAS 157 as it relates to our non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities that are recognized and disclosed at fair value in our consolidated financial statements on a nonrecurring basis, until January 1, 2009. We are evaluating the impact, if any, the adoption of FAS 157, for those assets and liabilities within the scope of FSP No. 157-2, will have on our financial position, results of operations and liquidity. We did not have any non-financial assets or non-financial liabilities that would be recognized or disclosed on a recurring basis as of JuneSeptember 30, 2008.


         FAS No. 161, "Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133."    In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, "Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133," which amends and expands the disclosure requirements of FAS 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instrumentsderivative instruments and Hedging Activities."hedging activities. FAS 161 requires qualitative disclosures about objectives and strategies for using derivatives, quantitative disclosures about fair value amounts of gains and losses on derivative instruments, and disclosures about credit-risk-related contingent features in derivative agreements. FAS 161 is effective prospectively for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that FAS 161 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

         FSP No. 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets."    In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. 142-3, "Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets." FSP No. 142-3which amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS 142. This change is intended to improve the consistency between the useful life of a recognized intangible asset under FAS 142 "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets."the period of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the asset under FAS 141R and other generally accepted accounting principles. The requirement for determining useful lives must be applied prospectively to intangible assets acquired after the effective date and the disclosure requirements must be applied prospectively to all intangible assets recognized as of, and subsequent to, the effective date. FSP No. 142-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that FSP No. 142-3 will have on our consolidated financial statements.

         FASEITF Issue No. 162, "The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.03-6-1, "Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities."    In MayJune 2008, the FASB issued FAS 162, "The HierarchyEITF Issue No. 03-6-1, which clarifies that all outstanding unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends, whether paid or unpaid, participate in undistributed earnings with common stockholders. Awards of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." FAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principlesthis nature are considered participating securities and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparationtwo-class method of financial statements. FAS 162computing basic and diluted earnings per share must be applied. EITF Issue No. 03-6-1 is effective 60 days followingfor us on January 1, 2009 with retrospective application. We do not expect the SEC's approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, "The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles." The implementation of this standard will notEITF Issue No. 03-6-1 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position and results of operations.

         EITF Issue No. 07-5, "Determining Whether an Instrument (or an Embedded Feature) Is Indexed to an Entity's Own Stock."    In June 2008, the FASB ratified EITF Issue No. 07-5, which provides that an entity should use a two step approach to evaluate whether an equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded feature) is indexed to its own stock, including evaluating the instrument's contingent exercise and settlement provisions. It also clarifies the impact of foreign currency denominated strike prices and market-based employee stock option valuation instruments on the evaluation. EITF Issue No. 07-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. We are currently evaluating the effects, if any, that EITF Issue No. 07-5 will have on our consolidated financial statements.


Table of Contents


RISK FACTORS

        Our future operating results could differ materially from the results described in this report due to the risks and uncertainties related to our business, including those discussed below.

If we fail to increase sales of several existing products and services, we will not meet our financial goals.

        Over the next few years, our success will depend substantially on our ability to increase revenue from our existing products and services. These products and services include Renagel/Renvela, Synvisc, Synvisc-One, Fabrazyme, Myozyme, Aldurazyme, Hectorol, Thymoglobulin, Thyrogen, Clolar,Clolar/Evoltra, Campath, Aldurazyme and diagnostic testing services. Our ability to increase sales will depend on a number of factors, including:

        Part of our growth strategy involves conducting additional clinical trials to support approval of expanded uses of some of our products, including ClolarClolar/Evoltra and alemtuzumab, pursuing marketing approval for our products in new jurisdictions and developing next generation products, such as Synvisc-One and Genz-112638. The success of this component of our growth strategy will depend on the outcome of these additional clinical trials, the content and timing of our submissions to regulatory authorities and whether and when those authorities determine to grant approvals.

        Because the healthcare industry is extremely competitive and regulatory requirements are rigorous, we spend substantial funds marketing our products and attempting to expand approved uses for them. These expenditures depress near-term profitability with no assurance that the expenditures will generate future profits that justify the expenditures.

Our future success will depend on our ability to effectively develop and market our products and services against those of our competitors.

        The human healthcare products and services industry is extremely competitive. Other organizations, including pharmaceutical, biotechnology, device and diagnostic testing companies, have developed and are developing products and services to compete with our products, services, and product candidates. If healthcare providers, patients or payors prefer these competitive products or services or these competitive



products or services have superior safety, efficacy, pricing or


Table of Contents


reimbursement characteristics, we will have difficulty maintaining or increasing the sales of our products and services.

        Renagel/Renvela primarily competes with two other products approved in the United States for the control of elevated phosphorus levels in patients with chronic kidney failure on hemodialysis. Fresenius Medical Care markets PhosLo®, a calcium-based phosphate binder. Shire Pharmaceuticals Group plc, or Shire, markets Fosrenol®, a non-calcium based phosphate binder. In 2007, Amgen, Inc. acquired Ilypsa and its product candidate, ILY101 (now AMG 223), a polymeric phosphate binder that completed a phase 2 trial in CKD patients on dialysis. Amgen is currently conducting a Phasephase 2b study. Outside the United States, Renagel/Renvela also compete with calcium-based phosphate binders and Fosrenol. Renagel also competes with over-the-counter calcium carbonate products such as TUMS® and metal-based options such as aluminum and magnesium.

        UCB S.A. has developed Zavesca®, a small molecule drug for the treatment of Gaucher disease, the disease addressed by Cerezyme. Zavesca, sold by Actelion Ltd., has been approved in the United States, European Union and Israel as an oral therapy for use in patients with mild to moderate Type 1 Gaucher disease for whom enzyme replacement therapy is unsuitable. In addition, Shire reported top-line data from a phase 1/2 clinical trial for its gene-activated glucocerebrosidase program, also to treat Gaucher disease, and initiated phase 3 studies in July 2007. Protalix Biotherapeutics Ltd. initiated a phase 3 trial for a plant-derived enzyme replacement therapy to treat Gaucher disease in the third quarter of 2007. Amicus Therapeutics, Inc., or Amicus, is conducting phase 2 trials for oral chaperone medication to treat Gaucher disease. We are also aware of other development efforts aimed at treating Gaucher disease.

        Outside the United States, Shire is marketing Replagal™, a competitive enzyme replacement therapy for Fabry disease which is the disease addressed by Fabrazyme. In addition, while Fabrazyme has received orphan drug designation, which provides us with seven years of market exclusivity for the product in the United States, other companies may seek to overcome our market exclusivity and, if successful, compete with Fabrazyme in the United States. Amicus has completed phase 2 trials for an oral chaperone medication to treat Fabry disease and plans to meetis in discussions with the FDA and EMEA to discussregarding the conduct of phase 3 clinical trials. We are aware of other development efforts aimed at treating Fabry disease.

        Current competition for Synvisc and Synvisc-One includes Supartz®, a product manufactured by Seikagaku Corporation that is sold in the United States by Smith & Nephew Orthopaedics and in Japan by Kaken Pharmaceutical Co. under the name Artz®; Hyalgan®, produced by Fidia Farmaceutici S.p.A. and marketed in the United States by Sanofi-Aventis; Orthovisc®, produced by Anika Therapeutics, Inc., and marketed in the United States by Johnson & Johnson's Mitek division and marketed outside the United States through distributors; Euflexxa™, a product manufactured and sold by Ferring Pharmaceuticals and marketed by Ferring in the United States and Europe; and Durolane®, manufactured by Q-Med AB and distributed outside the United States by Smith & Nephew Orthopedics. Durolane and Euflexxa are produced by bacterial fermentation, which may provide these products a competitive advantage over avian-sourced Synvisc and Synvisc-One. We are aware of various viscosupplementation products on the market or in development, but are unaware of any products that have physical properties of viscosity, elasticity or molecular weight comparable to those of Synvisc and Synvisc-One. Furthermore, several companies market products that are not viscosupplementation products but which are designed to relieve the pain associated with osteoarthritis. Synvisc and Synvisc-One will have difficulty competing with any of these products to the extent the competitive products have a similar safety profile and are considered more efficacious, less burdensome to administer or more cost-effective.

        Myozyme has marketing exclusivity in the United States until 2013 and in the European Union until 2016 due to its orphan drug status.status, although companies may seek to overcome the associated



marketing exclusivity. Amicus Therapeutics has completed two phase 1 clinical studies for a small molecule treatment for Pompe disease and initiated a phase 2 clinical trial in June 2008.


Table of Contents

        Several companies market products that, like Thymoglobulin, are used for the prevention and treatment of acute rejection in renal transplant. These products include Novartis' Simulect® and Roche's ZENAPAX®. Competition in the acute transplant rejection market is driven largely by product efficacy due to the potential decreased long-term survival of transplanted organs as the result of an acute organ rejection episode.

        The examples above are illustrative and not exhaustive. Almost all of our products and services face competition. Furthermore, the field of biotechnology is characterized by significant and rapid technological change. Discoveries by others may make our products or services obsolete. For example, competitors may develop approaches to treating LSDs that are more effective, convenient or less expensive than our products and product candidates. Because a significant portion of our revenue is derived from products that address this class of diseases and a substantial portion of our expenditures is devoted to developing new therapies for this class of diseases, such a development would have a material negative impact on our results of operations.

If we fail to obtain and maintain adequate levels of reimbursement for our products and services from third party payors, the commercial potential of our products and services will be significantly limited.

        A substantial portion of our domestic and international revenue comes from payments by third party payors, including government health administration authorities and private health insurers. Governments and other third party payors may not provide adequate insurance coverage or reimbursement for our products and services, which could impair our financial results.

        Third party payors are increasingly scrutinizing pharmaceutical budgets and healthcare expenses and are attempting to contain healthcare costs by:

        Efforts by third party payors to reduce costs could decrease demand for our products and services. In addition, in certain countries, including countries in the European Union and Canada, the coverage of prescription drugs, pricing and levels of reimbursement are subject to governmental control. Therefore, we may be unable to negotiate coverage, pricing and/or reimbursement on terms that are favorable to us. Government health administration authorities may also rely on analyses of the cost-effectiveness of certain therapeutic products in determining whether to provide reimbursement for such products. Our ability to obtain satisfactory pricing and reimbursement may depend in part on whether our products, the cost of some of which is high in comparison to other therapeutic products, are viewed as cost-effective.

        Furthermore, governmental regulatory bodies, such as the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), may from time-to-time make unilateral changes to reimbursement rates for our products and services. These changes could reduce our revenue by causing healthcare providers to be



less willing to use our products and services. Although we actively seek to assure that any initiatives that are undertaken by regulatory agencies involving reimbursement for our products and services do not have an adverse impact on us, we may not always be successful in these efforts.


Table of Contents

The development of new biotechnology products involves a lengthy and complex process, and we may be unable to commercialize any of the products we are currently developing.

        We have numerous products under development and devote considerable resources to research and development, including clinical trials.

        Before we can commercialize our development-stage product candidates, we will need to:

        This process involves a high degree of risk and takes many years. Our product development efforts with respect to a product candidate may fail for many reasons, including:

        Few research and development projects result in commercial products, and success in preclinical studies or early clinical trials often is not replicated in later studies. For example, in our phase 3 trial known as the Polymer Alternative for CDAD Treatment (PACT) study, tolevamer did not meet its primary endpoint. In our pivotal study of hylastan for treatment of patients with osteoarthritis of the knee, hylastan did not meet its primary endpoint. We may decide to abandon development of a product or service candidate at any time or we may be required to expend considerable resources repeating clinical trials or conducting additional trials, either of which would increase costs of development and delay any revenue from those programs.

        Our efforts to expand the approved indications for our products, and to gain marketing approval in new jurisdictions and to develop next generation products also may fail. These expansion efforts are subject to many of the risks associated with completely new products and, accordingly, we may fail to recoup the investments we make pursuing these strategies.


Our financial results are dependent on sales of Cerezyme.

        Sales of Cerezyme, our enzyme-replacement product for patients with Gaucher disease, totaled $623.7$932.9 million for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008, representing approximately 27% of our total revenue. Because our business is dependent on Cerezyme, negative trends in revenue from this product could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and cause the value of our securities to decline. We will lose revenue if alternative treatments gain commercial acceptance, if our marketing activities are restricted, or if coverage, pricing or reimbursement is limited. In addition, the patient population with Gaucher disease is not large. Because a significant percentage of that population


Table of Contents


already uses Cerezyme, opportunities for future sales growth are constrained. Furthermore, changes in the methods for treating patients with Gaucher disease, including treatment protocols that combine Cerezyme with other therapeutic products or reduce the amount of Cerezyme prescribed, could limit growth, or result in a decline, in Cerezyme sales.

We may encounter substantial difficulties managing our growth.

        Several risks are inherent to our plans to grow our business. Achieving our goals will require substantial investments in research and development, sales and marketing, and facilities. For example, we have spent considerable resources building and seeking regulatory approvals for our manufacturing plants. We cannot assure you that these facilities will prove sufficient to meet demand for our products or that we will not have excess capacity at these facilities. In addition, building our facilities is expensive, and our ability to recover these costs will depend on increased revenue from the products produced at the facilities.

        We produce relatively small amounts of material for research and development activities and pre-clinical trials. Even if a product candidate receives all necessary approvals for commercialization, we may not be able to successfully scale-up production of the product material at a reasonable cost or at all and we may not receive manufacturing approvals in sufficient time to meet product demand. For example, the FDA has concluded that Myozymealglucosidase alfa produced in our 2000 liter bioreactors is a different product than Myozymealglucosidase alfa produced in our 160 liter bioreactors and has therefore required us to submit a separate BLA for the 2000 liter product. This delay in receipt of FDA approval has had an adverse effect on our revenues and earnings and will continue to have an adverse effect until we receive regulatory approval. In addition, to meet the global demand for Myozyme, we are working to secure EMEA approval of Myozyme produced at our 4000 liter bioreactor scale manufacturing plant in Belgium. Product supply will beof Myozyme is expected to remain tight until the Belgian plant4000 liter process is approved, and delay in securing approval would have an adverse effect on our revenues and earnings.

        If we are able to increase sales of our products, we may have difficulty managing inventory levels. Marketing new therapies is a complicated process, and gauging future demand is difficult. With Renagel, for example, we have encountered problems in the past managing inventory levels at wholesalers. Comparable problems may arise with any of our products, particularly during market introduction.

        Growth in our business may also contribute to fluctuations in our operating results, which may cause the price of our securities to decline. Our revenue may fluctuate due to many factors, including changes in:


        We may also experience fluctuations in our quarterly results due to price changes and sales incentives. For example, purchasers of our products, particularly wholesalers, may increase purchase orders in anticipation of a price increase and reduce order levels following the price increase. We occasionally offer sales incentives and promotional discounts on some of our products and services that could have a similar impact. In addition, some of our products, including Synvisc, are subject to seasonal fluctuation in demand.


Table of Contents

Our operating results and financial position may be negatively impacted when we attempt to grow through business combination transactions.

        We may encounter problems assimilating operations acquired in business combination transactions. These transactions often entail the assumption of unknown liabilities, the loss of key employees, and the diversion of management attention. Furthermore, in any business combination, including our acquisition of Bioenvision, there is a substantial risk that we will fail to realize the benefits we anticipated when we decided to undertake the transaction. We have in the past taken significant charges for impaired goodwill and for impaired assets acquired in business combination transactions. We may be required to take similar charges in the future. We enter into most such transactions with an expectation that an acquired business will enhance the long-term strength of our business. These transactions, however, often depress our earnings in the near-term and the expected long-term benefits may never be realized. Business combination transactions also deplete cash resources and some may require us to issue substantial equity or incur significant debt.

Manufacturing problems may cause product launch delays, inventory shortages, recalls and unanticipated costs.

        In order to generate revenue from our approved products, we must be able to produce sufficient quantities of the products. Many of our products are difficult to manufacture. Our products that are biologics, for example, require product characterization steps that are more onerous than those required for most chemical pharmaceuticals. Accordingly, we employ multiple steps to attempt to control the manufacturing processes. Minor deviations in these manufacturing processes could result in unacceptable changes in the products that result in lot failures, product recalls, product liability claims and insufficient inventory. For example, we have experienced manufacturing issues with Thymoglobulin that resulted in write-offs or recalls of lots that went out of specification prior to expiry.

        Certain of the raw materials required in the commercial manufacturing and the formulation of our products are derived from biological sources, including mammalian sources and human plasma. Such raw materials may be difficult to procure and subject to contamination or recall. Also, some countries in which we market our products may restrict the use of certain biologically derived substances in the manufacture of drugs. A material shortage, contamination, recall, or restriction ofon the use of certain biologically derived substances in the manufacture of our products could adversely impact or disrupt our commercial manufacturing of our products or could result in a mandated withdrawal of our products from markets. This too, in turn, could adversely affect our ability to satisfy demand for our products, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results.

        In addition, we may only be able to produce some of our products at a very limited number of facilities and, in some cases, we rely on third parties to formulate and manufacture our products. For example, we manufacture all of our Cerezyme and a portion of our Fabrazyme and Myozyme products at our facility in Allston, Massachusetts. A number of factors could cause production interruptions at our facilities or the facilities of our third party providers, including equipment malfunctions, labor problems, raw material shortages, natural disasters, power outages, terrorist activities, or disruptions in the operations of our suppliers.


        Manufacturing is also subject to extensive government regulation. Regulatory authorities must approve the facilities in which human healthcare products are produced and those facilities are subject to ongoing inspections. In addition, changes in manufacturing processes may require additional regulatory approvals. Obtaining and maintaining these regulatory approvals could cause us to incur significant additional costs and lose revenue. Furthermore, any third party we use to manufacture, fill-finish or package our products to be sold must also be licensed by the applicable regulatory authorities. As a result, alternative third party providers may not be readily available on a timely basis.


TableOur international sales and operating expenses are subject to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

        A significant portion of Contentsour business is conducted in currencies other than our reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. We recognize foreign currency gains or losses arising from our operations in the period in which we incur those gains or losses. As a result, currency fluctuations among the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which we do business have caused foreign currency translation gains and losses in the past and will likely do so in the future. Because of the number of currencies involved, the variability of currency exposures and the potential volatility of currency exchange rates, we may suffer significant foreign currency translation losses in the future due to the effect of exchange rate fluctuations.

Guidelines and recommendations published by various organizations can reduce the use of our products.

        Professional societies, practice management groups, private health/science foundations, and organizations involved in various diseases may publish guidelines or recommendations to the healthcare and patient communities from time to time. Recommendations of government agencies or these other groups/organizations may relate to such matters as usage, dosage, route of administration, cost-effectiveness, and use of related therapies. Organizations like these have in the past made recommendations about our products and products of our competitors. Recommendations or guidelines that are followed by patients and healthcare providers could result in decreased use of our products. The perception by the investment community or shareholdersstockholders that recommendations or guidelines will result in decreased use of our products could adversely affect prevailing market price for our common stock. In addition, our success also depends on our ability to educate patients and healthcare providers about our products and their uses. If these education efforts are not effective, then we may not be able to increase the sales of our existing products or successfully introduce new products to the market.

We rely on third parties to provide us with materials and services in connection with the manufacture of our products.products and the performance of our services.

        Some materials necessary for commercial production of our products, including specialty chemicals and components necessary for manufacture, fill-finish and packaging, are provided by unaffiliated third party suppliers. In some cases, such materials are specifically cited in our marketing applicationapplications with regulatory authorities so that they must be obtained from that specific source unless and until the applicable authority approves another supplier. In addition, there may only be one available source for a particular chemical or component. For example, we acquire polyalylamine (PAA), used in the manufacture of Renagel, Renvela, Cholestagel and WelChol, from Cambrex Charles City, Inc., the only source for this material currently qualified in our FDA drug applications for these products. Our suppliers also may be subject to FDA regulations or the regulations of other governmental agencies outside the United States regarding manufacturing practices. We may be unable to manufacture our products or to perform our services in a timely manner or at all if these third party suppliers were to cease or interrupt production or otherwise fail to supply sufficient quantities of these materials or products to us for any reason, including due to regulatory requirements or actions, adverse financial developments at or affecting the supplier, or labor shortages or disputes.


        We also source some of our manufacturing, fill-finish, packaging and distribution operations to third party contractors. The manufacture of products, fill-finish, packaging and distribution of our products requires successful coordination among these third party providers and Genzyme. Our inability to coordinate these efforts, the inability of a third party contractor to secure sufficient source materials, the lack of capacity available at a third party contractor or any other problems with the operations of a third party contractor could require us to delay shipment of saleable products, recall products previously shipped or could impair our ability to supply products at all. This could increase our costs, cause us to lose revenue or market share and damage our reputation.

Government regulation imposes significant costs and restrictions on the development and commercialization of our products and services.

        Our success will depend on our ability to satisfy regulatory requirements. We may not receive required regulatory approvals on a timely basis or at all. Government agencies heavily regulate the production and sale of healthcare products and the provision of healthcare services. In particular, the FDA and comparable regulatory agencies in foreign jurisdictions must approve human therapeutic and diagnostic products before they are marketed, as well as the facilities in which they are made. This approval process can involve lengthy and detailed laboratory and clinical testing, sampling activities and other costly and time-consuming procedures. Several biotechnology companies have failed to obtain


Table of Contents


regulatory approvals because regulatory agencies were not satisfied with the structure or conduct of clinical trials. Similar problems could delay or prevent us from obtaining approvals. Furthermore, regulatory authorities, including the FDA, may not agree with our interpretations of our clinical trial data, which could delay, limit or prevent regulatory approvals.

        Therapies that have received regulatory approval for commercial sale may continue to face regulatory difficulties. If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, regulatory authorities could take actions against us, including:


        Furthermore, the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory agencies may require post-marketing clinical trials or patient outcome studies. We have agreed with the FDA, for example, to a number of post-marketing commitments as a condition to U.S. marketing approval for Fabrazyme, Aldurazyme, Myozyme and Clolar. In addition, regulatory agencies subject a marketed therapy, its manufacturer and the manufacturer's facilities to continual review and periodic inspections. The discovery of previously unknown problems with a therapy or the facility or process used to produce the therapy could prompt a regulatory authority to impose restrictions on us, or could cause us to voluntarily adopt such restrictions, including withdrawal of one or more of our products or services from the market. For example, we received a warning letter from the FDA in September 2007 that addressesaddressed certain of our manufacturing procedures in our Thymoglobulin production facility in Lyon, France. The FDA has


accepted our response to the warning letter and we continue to work to optimize our processes at this plant.

If regulatory authorities fail to approve pending applications in a timely matter, our results of operations will suffer.

        We expect regulatory action on several matters during the next 12 months. We, for example, anticipate regulatory action on our marketing applications for alglucosidase alfa produced at the 2000L scale in the United States and for Myozyme produced at the 4000L scale in Europe; our marketing applications for Mozobil in the United States and Europe; the expansion of labeling for clofarabine to include the treatment of adults with AML in the United States and Europe; our marketing application for Renvela in Europe and a label expansion of Renvela in the United States to include the treatment of CKD; and our marketing application for Synvisc-One in the United States.

        Regulatory authorities denying or delaying these approvals would adversely impact our projected revenue and income growth. A regulatory authority may deny or delay an approval due to its assessment of the data we supply. A regulatory authority, for instance, may not believe that we have adequately established a product's risk-benefit profile or adequately addressed negative safety signals. Clinical data are subject to varied interpretations, and regulatory authorities may disagree with our assessments of our data. In any such case, a regulatory authority could insist that we provide additional data, which could substantially delay or even prevent commercialization efforts, particularly if we are required to conduct additional pre-approval clinical studies. In addition, the FDA has failed to respond to companies by their Prescription Drug User Fee Act response dates, which failure causes a delay in the approval process. We have confronted delays in marketing in the United States for alglucosidase alfa produced at the 2000L scale, which has harmed our financial results, and we could face additional delays with this product or other products. Adverse events in clinical trials have resulted in regulatory problems for several drug candidates and our product candidates are susceptible to similar risks.

We may incur substantial costs as a result of litigation or other proceedings.

        A third party may sue us or one of our strategic collaborators for infringing the third party's patent or other intellectual property rights. Likewise, we or one of our strategic collaborators may sue to enforce intellectual property rights or to determine the scope and validity of third party proprietary rights. If we do not prevail in this type of litigation, we or our strategic collaborators may be required to:

        We are also currently involved in litigation matters and investigations that do not involve intellectual property claims and may be subject to additional actions in the future. For example, the federal government, state governments and private payors are investigating and have begun to file


Table of Contents


actions against numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, including Genzyme, alleging that the companies have overstated prices in order to inflate reimbursement rates. Domestic and international enforcement authorities also have instituted actions under healthcare "fraud and abuse" laws, including anti-kickback and false claims statutes. Moreover, individuals who use our products or services, including our diagnostic products and genetic testing services, sometimes bring product and professional liability claims against us or our subsidiaries.


        Some of our products are prescribed by physicians for uses not approved by the FDA or comparable regulatory agencies outside the United States. Although physicians may lawfully prescribe our products for off-label uses, any promotion by us of off-label uses would be unlawful. Some of our practices intended to make physicians aware of off-label uses of our products without engaging in off-label promotion could nonetheless be construed as off-label promotion. Although we have policies and procedures in place designed to help assure ongoing compliance with regulatory requirements regarding off-label promotion, some non-compliant actions may nonetheless occur. Regulatory authorities could take enforcement action against us if they believe we are promoting, or have promoted, our products for off-label use.

        We have only limited amounts of insurance, which may not provide coverage to offset a negative judgment or a settlement payment. We may be unable to obtain additional insurance in the future, or we may be unable to do so on favorable terms. Our insurers may dispute our claims for coverage. For example, we have submitted claims to our insurers for reimbursement of portions of the expenses incurred in connection with the litigation and settlement related to the consolidation of our tracking stock and are seeking coverage for the settlement. The insurers have purported to deny coverage. Any additional insurance we do obtain may not provide adequate coverage against any asserted claims.

        Regardless of merit or eventual outcome, investigations and litigation can result in:

Our international sales, clinical activities, manufacturing and other operations are subject to the economic, political, legal and business environments of the countries in which we do business, and our failure to operate successfully or adapt to changes in these environments could cause our international sales and operations to be limited or disrupted.

        Our international operations accounted for approximately 53%52% of our consolidated product and service revenues for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008. We expect that international product and service sales will continue to account for a significant percentage of our revenues for the foreseeable future. In addition, we have direct investments in a number of subsidiaries outside of the United States. Our international sales and operations could be limited or disrupted, and the value of our direct investments may be diminished, by any of the following:


Table of Contents


        Our operations and marketing practices are also subject to regulation and scrutiny by the governments of the countries in which we operate. In addition, the United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act prohibits U.S. companies and their representatives from offering, promising, authorizing or making payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business abroad. Failure to comply with domestic or foreign laws could result in various adverse consequences, including possible delay in the approval or refusal to approve a product, recalls, seizures, withdrawal of an approved product from the market, and/or the imposition of civil or criminal sanctions.

Our international sales and operating expenses are subject to fluctuations in currency exchange rates.

        A significant portion of our business is conducted in currencies other than our reporting currency, the U.S. dollar. We recognize foreign currency gains or losses arising from our operations in the period in which we incur those gains or losses. As a result, currency fluctuations among the U.S. dollar and the currencies in which we do business have caused foreign currency translation gains and losses in the past and will likely do so in the future. Because of the number of currencies involved, the variability of currency exposures and the potential volatility of currency exchange rates, we may suffer significant foreign currency translation losses in the future due to the effect of exchange rate fluctuations.

We may fail to adequately protect our proprietary technology, which would allow competitors or others to take advantage of our research and development efforts.

        Our long-term success largely depends on our ability to market technologically competitive products. If we fail to obtain or maintain adequate intellectual property protection in the United States or abroad, we may not be able to prevent third parties from using our proprietary technologies. Our currently pending or future patent applications may not result in issued patents. Patent applications are confidential for 18 months following their filing, and because third parties may have filed patent applications for technology covered by our pending patent applications without us being aware of those applications, our patent applications may not have priority over patent applications of others. In addition, our issued patents may not contain claims sufficiently broad to protect us against third parties with similar technologies or products, or provide us with any competitive advantage. If a third party initiates litigation regarding our patents, our collaborators' patents, or those patents for which we have license rights, and is successful, a court could declare our patents invalid or unenforceable or limit the scope of coverage of those patents. Governmental patent offices and courts have not consistently treated the breadth of claims allowed in biotechnology patents. If patent offices or the courts begin to allow or interpret claims more broadly, the incidence and cost of patent interference proceedings and


Table of Contents


the risk of infringement litigation will likely increase. On the other hand, if patent offices or the courts begin to allow or interpret claims more narrowly, the value of our proprietary rights may be reduced. Any changes in, or unexpected interpretations of, the patent laws may adversely affect our ability to enforce our patent position.

        We also rely upon trade secrets, proprietary know-how, and continuing technological innovation to remain competitive. We attempt to protect this information with security measures, including the use of confidentiality agreements with employees, consultants, and corporate collaborators. These individuals may breach these agreements and any remedies available to us may be insufficient to compensate for our damages. Furthermore, our trade secrets, know-how and other technology may otherwise become known or be independently discovered by our competitors.

Some of our products may face competition from lower cost generic or follow-on products.

        Some of our drug products, for example Renagel, Renvela, Clolar and Hectorol, are approved under the provisions of the United States Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act that render them susceptible to potential competition from generic manufacturers via the Abbreviated New Drug Application (ANDA) procedure. Generic manufacturers pursuing ANDA approval are not required to conduct



costly and time-consuming clinical trials to establish the safety and efficacy of their products; rather, they are permitted to rely on the innovator's data regarding safety and efficacy. Thus, generic manufacturers can sell their products at prices much lower than those charged by the innovative pharmaceutical or biotechnology companies who have incurred substantial expenses associated with the research and development of the drug product.

        The ANDA procedure includes provisions allowing generic manufacturers to challenge the effectiveness of the innovator's patent protection long prior to the generic manufacturer actually commercializing their products—the so-called "Paragraph IV" certification procedure. In recent years, generic manufacturers have used Paragraph IV certifications extensively to challenge patents on a wide array of innovative pharmaceuticals, and we expect this trend to continue and to implicate drug products with even relatively small totalmodest revenues.

        Other of our products, including Cerezyme, Fabrazyme, Aldurazyme, Myozyme and Campath (so-called "biotech drugs") are not currently considered susceptible to an abbreviated approval procedure, either due to current United States law or FDA practice in approving biologic products. However, the United States Congress is expected to continue to explore, and ultimately enact, legislation that would establish a procedure for the FDA to accept ANDA-like abbreviated applications for the approval of "follow-on," "biosimilar" or "comparable" biotech drugs. Such legislation has already been adopted in the European Union.

        Both Renagel and Hectorol are subjects of ANDAs containing Paragraph IV certifications. In the case of Renagel, the ANDA Paragraph IV certification relates only to one of our Renagel patents, namely our patent that covers features of our tablet dosage form. This patent expires in 2020. The2020, and the ANDA applicant has alleged that its generic tabletproposed product would not infringe our tablet dosage formthat patent. We reviewed the Paragraph IV certification and did not initiate patent but we have not yet received sufficient information fromlitigation within the ANDA applicant to assess the merits of this position.45-day statutory period. The ANDA does not contain a Paragraph IV certification with respect to our Renagel pharmaceutical composition and medical use patent estate, which protect the product and its approved indications until 2014. Because the last of our composition of matter patents expire in 2014, we would expect Renagel to be subject to competition beginning in 2014.

        In the case of Hectorol, the ANDA applicant has submitted a Paragraph IV certification alleging the invalidity of our patent related to the use of Hectorol to treat hyperparathyroidism secondary to end-stage renal disease (which patent expires in 2014), and alleging non-infringement of our patent claiming our highly purified form of Hectorol (which patent expires in 2021). We initiated patent infringement litigation in February 2008. We believe that our


Table of Contents


patents are valid and have not yet received sufficient information from the ANDA application to assessare currently assessing the merits of itsthe ANDA applicant's non-infringement allegation.positions.

        Other of our products, including Cerezyme, Fabrazyme, Aldurazyme, Myozyme and Campath (so-called "biotech drugs") are not currently considered susceptible to an abbreviated approval procedure, either due to current United States law or FDA practice in approving biologic products. However, the United States Congress is expected to continue to explore, and ultimately enact, legislation that would establish a procedure for the FDA to accept ANDA-like abbreviated applications for the approval of "follow-on," "biosimilar" or "comparable" biotech drugs. Such legislation has already been adopted in the European Union.

        If either of the ANDA filers or any other generic manufacturer were to receive approval to sell a generic or follow-on version of one of our products, that product would become subject to increased competition and our revenues for that product would be adversely affected.

We may be required to license technology from competitors or others in order to develop and commercialize some of our products and services, and it is uncertain whether these licenses would be available.

        Third party patents may cover some of the products or services that we or our strategic partners are developing or producing. A patent is entitled to a presumption of validity and accordingly, we face significant hurdles in any challenge to a patent. In addition, even if we are successful in challenging the validity of a patent, the challenge itself may be expensive and require significant management attention.

        To the extent valid third party patent rights cover our products or services, we or our strategic collaborators would be required to seek licenses from the holders of these patents in order to manufacture, use or sell these products and services, and payments under them would reduce our



profits from these products and services. We may not be able to obtain these licenses on favorable terms, or at all. If we fail to obtain a required license or are unable to alter the design of our technology to fall outside the scope of a third party patent, we may be unable to market some of our products and services, which would limit our profitability.

Importation of products may lower the prices we receive for our products.

        In the United States and abroad, many of our products are subject to competition from lower-priced versions of our products and competing products from other countries where government price controls or other market dynamics result in lower prices for such products. Our products that require a prescription in the United States may be available to consumers in markets such as Canada, Mexico, Taiwan and the Middle East without a prescription, which may cause consumers to further seek out these products in these lower priced markets. The ability of patients and other customers to obtain these lower priced imports has grown significantly as a result of the Internet, an expansion of pharmacies in Canada and elsewhere that target American purchasers, an increase in U.S.-based businesses affiliated with these Canadian pharmacies marketing to American purchasers and other factors. Most of these foreign imports are illegal under current United States law. However, the volume of imports continues to rise due to the limited enforcement resources of the FDA and the United States Customs Service, and there is increased political pressure to permit such imports as a mechanism for expanding access to lower-priced medicines. The importation of lower-priced versions of our products into the United States and other markets adversely affects our profitability. This impact could become more significant in the future.

Legislative or regulatory changes may adversely impact our business.

        The United States government and other governments have shown significant interest in pursuing healthcare reform. Any government-adopted reform measures could adversely impact:

        New laws, regulations and judicial decisions, or new interpretations of existing laws, regulations and decisions, that relate to healthcare availability, methods of delivery or payment for products and services, or sales, marketing or pricing may cause our revenue to decline, and we may need to revise our research and development programs.


Table of Contents

        On September 27, 2007, the Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act of 2007 (the "FDAAA") was enacted, giving the FDA enhanced post-market authority, including the authority to require post-marketing studies and clinical trials, labeling changes based on new safety information, and compliance with risk evaluations and mitigation strategies approved by the FDA. The FDA's exercise of its new authority could result in delays or increased costs during the period of product development, clinical trials and regulatory review and approval, increased costs to assure compliance with new post-approval regulatory requirements, and potential restrictions on the sale of approved products.

If our strategic alliances are unsuccessful, our operating results will be negatively impacted.

        Several of our strategic initiatives involve alliances with other biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies. The success of these arrangements is largely dependent on technology and other intellectual property contributed by our strategic partners or the resources, efforts, and skills of our partners. Disputes and difficulties in such relationships are common, often due to conflicting priorities or conflicts of interest. Merger and acquisition activity may exacerbate these conflicts. The benefits of these alliances are reduced or eliminated when strategic partners:



        Furthermore, payments we make under these arrangements may exacerbate fluctuations in our financial results. In addition, under some of our strategic alliances, we make upfront and milestone payments well in advance of commercialization of products with no assurance that we will ever recoup these payments. We also may make equity investments in our strategic partners, as we did with Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. in February 2008 and RenaMed Biologics, Inc., or RenaMed, in June 2005. Our strategic equity investments are subject to market fluctuations, access to capital and other business events, such as initial public offerings, the completion of clinical trials and regulatory approvals, which can impact the value of these investments. For example, in October 2006, RenaMed suspended clinical trials of its renal assist device which was being developed to treat patients with acute renal failure, causing us to write off our entire investment in RenaMed. If any of our other strategic equity investments decline in value and remain below cost for an extended duration, we may incur additional charges.

We may require significant additional financing, which may not be available to us on favorable terms, if at all.

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, we had $1.25$1.5 billion in cash, cash equivalents and short- and long-term investments, excluding our investments in equity securities.

        We intend to use substantial portions of our available cash for:


Table of Contents

        WeOur cash reserves may likely be further reduce available cash reservesreduced to pay principal and interest on outstanding debt, includingthe $690.0 million in principal under our 1.25% convertible senior notes due December 1, 2023. We plan to redeem all $690.0 million in principal of 1.25% convertible senior notes.these notes on December 1, 2008 using available cash. The notes will be redeemed for cash at 100% of the principal amount of the notes plus accrued interest unless they are converted, at the option of the noteholders, into shares of our common stock on or before November 25, 2008, at a conversion price of $71.24 per share. If our common stock is trading below the conversion price on and before November 25, 2008, we expect that the noteholders will choose to redeem their notes for cash.

        To satisfy our cash requirements,In addition, we have several outstanding legal proceedings. Involvement in investigations and litigation can be expensive and a court may ultimately require that we pay expenses and damages. As a



result of legal proceedings, we may also be required to pay fees to a holder of proprietary rights in order to continue certain operations.

        Recently, the general economic, global capital and credit market conditions in the United States and other parts of the world have deteriorated significantly and have adversely affected access to obtain additional financing.capital and increased the cost of capital. However, we continue to believe that our available cash, investments and cash flow from operations, together with our revolving credit facility and other available debt financing, will be adequate to meet our operating, investing and financing needs in the foreseeable future. We maycurrently do not rely on short-term borrowing to fund our operations and, as a result, we do not believe that existing global capital and credit market conditions will have a significant impact on our near-term liquidity. We are closely monitoring our liquidity as well as the condition of these markets. If these conditions continue or become worse, our future cost of debt and equity capital and our future access to capital markets could be unableadversely affected. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain any additional financing in the future or extend any existing financing arrangements on favorable terms, or at all or on terms that we or our investors consider favorable.all.

Our level of indebtedness may harm our financial condition and results of operations.

        As of June 30, 2008, we had $696.8 million of outstanding indebtedness, excluding capital leases. We may incur additional indebtedness in the future. Our level of indebtedness will have several important effects on our future financial condition and results of operations, including:

        Our ability to make payments and interest on our outstanding and future indebtedness depends upon our future operating results and financial condition.

ITEM 3.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market Risk

        We are exposed to potential loss from exposure to market risks represented principally by changes in foreign exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices. At JuneSeptember 30, 2008, we held derivative contracts in the form of foreign exchange forward contracts. We also held a number of other financial instruments, including investments in marketable securities and we had debt securities outstanding. We do not hold derivatives or other financial instruments for speculative purposes.

Equity Price Risk

        We hold investments in a limited number of U.S. and European equity securities. We estimated the potential loss in fair value due to a 10% decrease in the equity prices of each marketable security held at JuneSeptember 30, 2008 to be $5.7 million, as compared to $6.5 million at December 31, 2007. This estimate assumes no change in foreign exchange rates from quarter-end spot rates and excludes any potential risk associated with securities that do not have a readily determinable market value.

Interest Rate Risk

        We are exposed to potential loss due to changes in interest rates. Our principal interest rate exposure is to changes in U.S. interest rates. Instruments with interest rate risk include short- and long-term investments in fixed income securities. Other exposures to interest rate risk include the fair value of fixed rate convertible debt and other fixed rate debt. To estimate the potential loss due to changes in interest rates, we performed a sensitivity analysis using the instantaneous adverse change in interest rates of 100 basis points across the yield curve.


Table of Contents

        We used the following assumptions in preparing the sensitivity analysis for our convertible bonds:


        On this basis, we estimate the potential loss in fair value that would result from a hypothetical 1% (100 basis points) decrease in interest rates to be $2.7$1.4 million as of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, as compared to $3.3 million as of December 31, 2007.


Foreign Exchange Risk

        As a result of our worldwide operations, we may face exposure to adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates, primarily to the Euro, British Pound and Japanese Yen. Exposures to currency fluctuations that result from sales of our products in foreign markets are partially offset by the impact of currency fluctuations on our international expenses. We use forward foreign exchange contracts to further reduce our exposure to changes in exchange rates, primarily to offset the earnings effect from intercompany short-term foreign currency assets and liabilities. We also hold a limited amount of foreign cash and foreign currency denominated equity securities.

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, we estimated the potential loss in fair value of our foreign currency contracts foreign cash, and foreign equity holdings that would result from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in exchange rates to be $71.2$23.8 million, as compared to $36.2 million as of December 31, 2007. The change from the prior period is due to an increasea decrease in our net foreign currency contracts. Since the contracts hedge mainly transactional exchange exposures, any changes in the fair values of the contracts would be offset by changes in the underlying values of the hedged items.

ITEM 4.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

        As of JuneSeptember 30, 2008, we evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")). Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of JuneSeptember 30, 2008.

        There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

        We periodically become subject to legal proceedings and claims arising in connection with our business. Although we cannot predict the outcome of these additional proceedings and claims, we do not believe the ultimate resolution of any of these existing matters would have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.


Table of Contents


ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS

        We incorporate by reference our disclosure related to risk factors which is set forth under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Genzyme Corporation and Subsidiaries' Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Risk Factors" in Part I., Item 2. of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.



ITEM 2.    UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

        The following table provides information about our repurchases of our equity securities during the quarter ended JuneSeptember 30, 2008:

Period
 Total
Number
of Shares
Purchased
 Average
Price
Paid
per
Share
 Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
 Approximate
Dollar Value
of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs
 

April 1, 2008-April 30, 2008

       $1,195,296,813.47 

May 1, 2008-May 31, 2008

  1,000,000 $69.78  1,000,000 $1,125,521,738.47 

June 1, 2008-June 30, 2008

        $1,125,521,738.47 
            
 

Total

  1,000,000(1)$69.78(2) 1,000,000    
            
Period
 Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
 Average
Price
Paid per
Share
 Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
Programs
 Approximate
Dollar Value
of Shares that
May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the
Plans or
Programs
 

July 1, 2008-July 31, 2008

  2,336(1)$78.97   $1,125,521,738.47 

August 1, 2008-August 31, 2008

        1,125,521,738.47 

September 1, 2008-September 30, 2008

        1,125,521,738.47 
            

Total

  2,336 $78.97      
            

(1)
In May 2007,Represents shares surrendered to us by employees who used Genzyme Stock that they otherwise owned to pay the exercise price of their stock options. The shares used to satisfy the exercise price of stock options are not considered part of the publicly announced stock repurchase program approved by our board of directors authorized a stock repurchase program to repurchase up to an aggregate maximum amount of $1.5 billion or 20,000,000 shares of our outstanding common stock over three years. During the second quarter of fiscal 2008, we repurchased 1,000,000 shares of our common stock under this program for $69.8 million of cash, including fees.

(2)
Represents the weighted average price paid per share for repurchases of our common stock made during the second quarter of fiscal 2008.in May 2007.

ITEM 4.    SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

        We held our annual meeting of shareholders on May 22, 2008. We have set forth below the results of the voting on proposals submitted to our shareholders for a vote at the annual meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes were counted for determining a quorum, but were not treated as votes cast on any of the proposals.

        a.     A proposal to re-elect five directors, each for a one-year term:

 
 Number of Votes  
 
 
 Number of
Broker Non-Votes
 
Nominee
 For Against Abstain 

Douglas A. Berthiaume

  218,770,394  5,631,336  2,688,606  7 

Gail K. Boudreaux

  223,421,741  1,058,804  2,609,794  4 

Robert J. Carpenter

  218,814,032  5,593,529  2,682,776  6 

Charles L. Cooney

  218,809,678  5,580,163  2,700,495  7 

Richard F. Syron

  130,586,444  93,697,045  2,806,841  13 

        The number of votes cast in favor of each nominee exceeded the number of votes cast against each nominee and therefore each was reelected as a director of Genzyme. The terms of office of Victor J. Dzau, M.D., Senator Connie Mack III and Henri A. Termeer continued after the annual meeting.


Table of Contents

        b.     A proposal to amend the 2004 Equity Incentive Plan by increasing the number of shares of common stock covered by the plan by 2,250,000 shares;

Number of
Votes for
 Number of
Votes Against
 Number of
Votes Abstaining
 Number of
Broker Non-Votes
 
 177,441,327  21,932,661  2,208,390  25,507,965 

        The number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceeded the number of votes cast against it, and therefore the proposal was adopted.

        c.     A proposal to amend the 2007 Director Equity Plan to specify the automatic grant provisions under the plan;

Number of
Votes for
 Number of
Votes Against
 Number of
Votes Abstaining
 Number of
Broker Non-Votes
 
 183,333,706  15,991,677  2,256,996  25,507,964 

        The number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceeded the number of votes cast against it, and therefore the proposal was adopted.

        d.     A proposal to ratify the audit committee's selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP as our independent auditors for 2008;

Number of
Votes for
 Number of
Votes Against
 Number of
Votes Abstaining
 Number of
Broker Non-Votes
 
 221,211,634  3,641,708  2,236,996  5
 

        The number of votes cast in favor of the proposal exceeded the number of votes cast against it, and therefore the proposal was adopted.

ITEM 6.    EXHIBITS

(a)
Exhibits

        See the Exhibit Index following the signature page to this report on Form 10-Q.


Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

        Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

GENZYME CORPORATION

Dated: November 7, 2008


By:


/s/ MICHAEL S. WYZGA  
    GENZYME CORPORATION

Dated: August 8, 2008




By:


/s/ 
MICHAEL S. WYZGA

Michael S. Wyzga
Executive Vice President, Finance, Chief
Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer

Table of Contents

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

FORM 10-Q, JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 2008

EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NO.
 DESCRIPTION
*3.1 Restated Articles of Organization of Genzyme, as amended. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Genzyme's Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2006.
*3.2 By-laws of Genzyme, as amended. Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Genzyme's Form 8-K filed May 25, 2007.
*10.12004 Equity Incentive Plan. Filed as Appendix A to Genzyme's Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders filed April 10, 2008.
*10.22007 Director Equity Plan. Filed as Appendix B to Genzyme's Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A for the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders filed April 10, 2008.
10.3Form of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement for grants under Genzyme's 2007 Director Equity Plan. Filed herewith.
10.4Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement for grants under Genzyme's 2007 Director Equity Plan. Filed herewith.
10.5Forms of Non-Statutory Stock Option Agreement for grants to executive officers under Genzyme's 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. Filed herewith.
10.6Forms of Incentive Stock Option Agreement for grants to executive officers under Genzyme's 2001 Equity Incentive Plan. Filed herewith.
**10.7License and Co-Development Agreement between Genzyme and Isis Pharmaceuticals, Inc. dated June 24, 2008. Filed herewith.
31.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
31.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Filed herewith.
32.1 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Furnished herewith.
32.2 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Furnished herewith.

*
Indicates exhibit previously filed with the SEC and incorporated herein by reference. Exhibits filed with Forms 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, 8-A or Schedule 14A of Genzyme Corporation were filed under Commission File No. 0-14680.

**
Confidential treatment has been requested for the redacted portions of Exhibit 10.7.



QuickLinks

GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES FORM 10-Q, SEPTEMBER 30, 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss) (Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited, amounts in thousands, except par value amounts)
GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited, amounts in thousands)
GENZYME CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES Notes to Unaudited, Consolidated Financial Statements
RISK FACTORS
SIGNATURES
EXHIBIT INDEX