- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                       SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

                             WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

                              -----------------------------------------------

                                    FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

         [X]    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                       THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998

                                          OR

         [ ]     TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
                        THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROMFor the transition period from ___________ TOto _____________

                           COMMISSION FILE NO.Commission File No. 33-7591

                              OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION
                      (AN ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION)--------------------

                          Oglethorpe Power Corporation
                      (An Electric Membership Corporation)

             (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


                 GEORGIAGeorgia                                       58-1211925
       ------------------------------                       ------------------
      (State or other jurisdiction of                        (I.R.S. employer
      incorporation or organization)                       identification no.)


          POST OFFICE BOXPost Office Box 1349
        2100 EAST EXCHANGE PLACE
                TUCKER, GEORGIAEast Exchange Place
             Tucker, Georgia                                   30085-1349
  ---------------------------------------                      ----------
  (Address of principal executive offices)                     (Zip Code)


Registrant's telephone number, including area code   (770) 270-7600


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X/X/     No ---      ---/ /
                                             ----       ----

         Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. THE REGISTRANT IS A
MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION AND HAS NO AUTHORIZED OR OUTSTANDING EQUITY SECURITIES.The Registrant is a
membership corporation and has no authorized or outstanding equity securities.

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------





                          OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION

                     INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q
                    FOR THE QUARTER ENDED JUNESEPTEMBER 30, 1998

PAGE NO.Page No. -------- PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements Condensed Balance Sheets as of JuneSeptember 30, 1998 (Unaudited) and December 31, 1997 3 Condensed Statements of Revenues and Expenses and Comprehensive Margin (Unaudited) for the Three Months and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and 1997 5 Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) for the SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and 1997 6 Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements 7 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 8 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION Item 5. Other Information 15 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 1517 SIGNATURES 1618
2 PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION ITEMItem 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS JUNEFinancial Statements Oglethorpe Power Corporation Condensed Balance Sheets September 30, , 1998 AND DECEMBERand December 31, 1997 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ (dollars in thousands) 1998 1997 ASSETSAssets (Unaudited) ------------------------- ELECTRIC PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST:Electric plant, at original cost: In service $4,901,207$4,900,356 $4,910,067 Less: Accumulated provision for depreciation (1,466,079)(1,496,228) (1,412,287) ---------- ---------- 3,435,1283,404,128 3,497,780 Nuclear fuel, at amortized cost 85,40083,310 90,423 Construction work in progress 15,42517,410 13,578 ---------- ---------- 3,535,9533,504,848 3,601,781 ---------- ---------- INVESTMENTS AND FUNDS:Investments and funds: Decommissioning fund, at market 116,877107,699 105,817 Deposit on Rocky Mountain transactions, at cost 53,93654,845 52,176 Bond, reserve and construction funds, at market 32,72832,934 33,160 Investment in associated organizations, at cost 15,66815,597 15,940 Other, at cost 4,6454,940 4,641 ---------- ---------- 223,854216,015 211,734 ---------- ---------- CURRENT ASSETS:Current assets: Cash and temporary cash investments, at cost 48,19871,905 63,215 Other short-term investments, at market 100,493103,586 97,022 Receivables 183,158127,242 105,993 Inventories, at average cost 74,53774,916 65,528 Prepayments and other current assets 14,72520,501 12,530 ---------- ---------- 421,111398,150 344,288 ---------- ---------- DEFERRED CHARGES:Deferred charges: Premium and loss on reacquired debt, being amortized 215,551211,136 196,583 Deferred amortization of Scherer leasehold 97,87298,657 96,303 Deferred debt expense, being amortized 16,93516,842 15,345 Other 40,53539,462 43,823 ---------- ---------- 370,893366,097 352,054 ---------- ---------- $4,551,811$4,485,110 $4,509,857 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. 3 OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS JUNEOglethorpe Power Corporation Condensed Balance Sheets September 30, 1998 AND DECEMBERand December 31, 1997 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (dollars in thousands) 1998 1997 EQUITY AND LIABILITIESEquity and Liabilities (Unaudited) ------------------------- CAPITALIZATION:Capitalization: Patronage capital and membership fees (including unrealized gain (loss) of $489$2,854 at JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and ($107) at December 31, 1997 on available-for-sale securities) $ 340,322$342,775 $ 330,509 Long-term debt 3,203,4903,183,280 3,258,046 Obligation under capital leases 285,518283,958 288,638 Obligation under Rocky Mountain transactions 53,93654,845 52,176 ---------- ---------- 3,883,266--------- --------- 3,864,858 3,929,369 ---------- ---------- CURRENT LIABILITIES:--------- --------- Current liabilities: Long-term debt and capital leases due within one year 93,70696,483 89,556 Notes payable 3,982 -- Accounts payable 124,88369,785 51,103 Accrued interest 9,78514,415 12,961 Accrued and withheld taxes 11,19917,154 517 Other current liabilities 3,9354,742 8,428 ---------- ---------- 243,508--------- --------- 206,561 162,565 ---------- ---------- DEFERRED CREDITS AND OTHER LIABILITIES:--------- --------- Deferred credits and other liabilities: Gain on sale of plant, being amortized 59,51958,900 60,756 Net benefit of Rocky Mountain transactions, being amortized 90,78289,986 92,375 Net benefit of sale of income tax benefits, being amortized 30,03528,032 34,039 Accumulated deferred income taxes 63,117 63,117 Decommissioning reserve 154,745146,122 142,354 Other 26,83927,534 25,282 ---------- ---------- 425,037--------- --------- 413,691 417,923 ---------- ---------- $4,551,811--------- --------- $4,485,110 $4,509,857 ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------- --------- --------- ---------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. 4 OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES AND COMPREHENSIVE MARGIN (UNAUDITED) FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNEOglethorpe Power Corporation Condensed Statements of Revenues and Expenses and Comprehensive Margin (Unaudited) For the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 ANDand 1997 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (dollars in thousands) Three Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 1997 1998 1997 -------------------------------- ------------------------------- OPERATING REVENUES:Operating revenues: Sales to Members $297,014 $230,180 $528,957 $487,211$ 331,361 $ 280,503 $ 860,317 $ 767,714 Sales to non-Members 19,713 12,696 23,037 27,150 -------- -------- -------- --------14,414 6,076 37,451 33,226 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total operating revenues 316,727 242,876 551,994 514,361 -------- -------- -------- -------- OPERATING EXPENSES:345,775 286,579 897,768 800,940 --------- --------- --------- --------- Operating expenses: Fuel 48,978 46,704 88,845 91,59355,680 61,206 144,525 152,799 Production 48,486 42,195 95,417 91,04949,996 43,418 145,413 134,490 Purchased power 130,141 62,321 184,705 120,311153,202 95,038 337,907 215,350 Depreciation and amortization 31,077 30,142 62,199 66,38131,074 30,154 93,273 96,534 Other operating expenses - 91 - 5,786 -------- -------- -------- -------- TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES 258,682 181,453 431,166 375,120 -------- -------- -------- -------- OPERATING MARGIN 58,045 61,423 120,828 139,241 -------- -------- -------- -------- OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)-- 10 -- 5,775 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total operating expenses 289,952 229,826 721,118 604,948 --------- --------- --------- --------- Operating margin 55,823 56,753 176,650 195,992 --------- --------- --------- --------- Other income (expense): Interest income 8,273 6,320 16,113 13,7545,742 7,247 21,856 21,002 Amortization of net benefit of sale of income tax benefits 2,799 2,799 5,596 5,5968,396 8,396 Allowance for equity funds used during construction 9 (35) 3119 32 49 81 Other 788 2,061 913 3,568 -------- -------- -------- -------- TOTAL OTHER INCOME 11,869 11,145 22,653 22,967 -------- -------- -------- -------- INTEREST CHARGES:786 457 1,699 4,025 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total other income 9,346 10,535 32,000 33,504 --------- --------- --------- --------- Interest charges: Interest on long-term-debt and other obligations 68,397 67,251 134,541 147,80765,256 68,488 199,797 216,294 Allowance for debt funds used during construction (73) (193) (278) (545) -------- -------- -------- -------- NET INTEREST CHARGES 68,324 67,058 134,263 147,262 -------- -------- -------- -------- NET MARGIN 1,590 5,510 9,218 14,946(173) (328) (452) (873) --------- --------- --------- --------- Net interest charges 65,083 68,160 199,345 215,421 --------- --------- --------- --------- Net margin (loss) 86 (872) 9,305 14,075 Net change in unrealized gain (loss) on available-for sale securities 367 489 596 (458) -------- -------- -------- -------- COMPREHENSIVE MARGIN $1,957 $5,999 $9,814 $14,488 -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- -------- --------2,366 787 2,961 329 --------- --------- --------- --------- Comprehensive margin $ 2,452 ($ 85) $ 12,266 $ 14,404 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. 5 OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED) FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNEOglethorpe Power Corporation Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 1998 ANDand 1997 - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- (dollars in thousands) 1998 1997 --------- --------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:Cash flows from operating activities: Net margin $ 9,2189,305 $ 14,946 ------------ ---------- ADJUSTMENTS TO RECONCILE NET MARGIN TO NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES:14,075 --------- --------- Adjustments to reconcile net margin to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 88,771 99,558136,151 139,190 Net benefit of Rocky Mountain transactions - 23,266-- 22,470 Deferred gain from Corporate Restructuring --- 4,670 Allowance for equity funds used during construction (31) (49) (81) Amortization of deferred gains (1,237) (1,204)(1,856) (1,823) Amortization of net benefit of sale of income tax benefits (5,596) (5,596) Deferred income taxes - (1,660)(8,396) (8,396) Other 8,501 1,307 CHANGE IN NET CURRENT ASSETS, EXCLUDING LONG-TERM DEBT DUE WITHIN ONE YEAR, NOTES PAYABLE AND DEFERRED MARGINS TO BE REFUNDED WITHIN ONE YEAR:9,991 3,268 Change in net current assets, excluding long-term debt and capital leases due within one year and notes payable: Receivables (77,165) (6,815)(21,249) (4,290) Inventories (9,009) (5,063)(9,388) 9,972 Prepayments and other current assets (2,195 2,062(7,971) (8,176) Accounts payable 73,780 7,49518,682 11,403 Accrued interest (3,176) (7,816)1,454 (2,251) Accrued and withheld taxes 10,682 9,22016,637 14,860 Other current liabilities (4,493) 2,869 ------------ ---------- TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS 78,832 122,244 ------------ ---------- NET CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES 88,050 137,190 ------------ ---------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:(3,686) 1,683 --------- --------- Total adjustments 130,320 182,499 --------- --------- Net cash provided by operating activities 139,625 196,574 --------- --------- Cash flows from investing activities: Property additions (15,786) (39,386)(25,779) (49,942) Net proceeds from bond, reserve and construction funds 572 21,3781,143 21,616 Decrease (increase) in investment in associated organizations 272 (16)343 (28) Increase in other short-term investments (3,015) (2,395)(4,520) (4,306) Increase in decommissioning fund (7,631) (4,521)(8,988) (7,709) Net cash received in Corporate Restructuring - 20,175 Other - 3,320 ------------ ---------- NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES (25,588) (1,445) ------------ ---------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Debt-- 23,495 --------- --------- Net cash used in investing activities (37,801) (16,874) --------- --------- Cash flows from financing activities: Long-term debt proceeds, net (27,491) 111,306 Debt(5,556) 100,404 Long-term debt payments (51,224) (286,397)(68,931) (302,617) Premium paid on refinancing of debt (24,041) -- Increase in notes payable 3,982 -- Retirement of patronage capital --- (48,863) Other 1,236 (3,042) ------------ ---------- NET CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES (77,479) (226,996) ------------ ---------- NET DECREASE IN CASH AND TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS (15,017) (91,251) CASH AND TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD1,412 (1,426) --------- --------- Net cash used in financing activities (93,134) (252,502) --------- --------- Net increase (decrease) in cash and temporary cash investments 8,690 (72,802) Cash and temporary cash investments at beginning of period 63,215 132,783 ------------ ---------- CASH AND TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS AT END OF PERIOD--------- --------- Cash and temporary cash investments at end of period $ 48,19871,905 $ 41,532 ------------ ---------- ------------ ---------- CASH PAID FOR:59,981 --------- --------- --------- --------- Cash paid for: Interest (net of amounts capitalized) $ 123,020177,396 $ 145,392202,400 Income taxes --- 830
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements. 6 OGLETHORPE POWER CORPORATION NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNEOglethorpe Power Corporation Notes to Condensed Financial Statements September 30, 1998 ANDand 1997 (A) The condensed financial statements included herein have been prepared by Oglethorpe Power Corporation (Oglethorpe), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In the opinion of management, the information furnished herein reflects all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) and estimates necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the results for the periods ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and 1997. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such SEC rules and regulations, although Oglethorpe believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. It is suggested that these condensed financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto included in Oglethorpe's latest Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC. Certain amounts for 1997 have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. (B) In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." The standard requires that all derivative instruments be recognized as assets or liabilities and be measured at fair value. Oglethorpe is required to adopt SFAS No. 133 by January 1, 2000. Oglethorpe is currently assessing the impact that adoption of SFAS No. 133 will have on results of operations and financial condition and is undecided as to the date the standard will be adopted. (C) As discussed in Notes 1 and 2 of Notes to Financial Statements included in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, Oglethorpe entered into long-term lease transactions for its 74.6% undivided ownership interest in the Rocky Mountain Pumped Storage Hydroelectric Project (Rocky Mountain). Under the terms of these transactions, Oglethorpe leased the facility to three institutional investors for the useful life of the facility, who in turn leased it back to Oglethorpe for a term of 30 years, through a wholly owned subsidiary of Oglethorpe, Rocky Mountain Leasing Corporation. The assets of Rocky Mountain Leasing Corporation are not available to pay creditors of Oglethorpe or its affiliates. 7 ITEMItem 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS GENERALManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations General LEM POWER MARKETER ARRANGEMENTSPower Marketer Arrangements As previously reported, in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, Oglethorpe entered into long-term power marketer arrangements effective January 1, 1997 for approximately 50% of the load requirements of its 39 retail electric distribution cooperative members (the Members) with LG&E Energy Marketing Inc. (LEM), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of LG&E Power Inc., a Delaware corporation (LPI), and of LG&E Energy Corp. (LG&E), which is a diversified energy services company headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky. In July 1998, LG&E recently announced that it iswas discontinuing its merchant energy trading and sales business and associated gas gathering and processing business and, as a result, recorded an after-tax loss on discontinued operations of $225 million in the second quarter of 1998. LG&E stated that the loss on discontinued operations results primarily from several fixed-price energy marketing agreements, including the agreements between LEM and Oglethorpe. Oglethorpe has two agreements with LEM. One involves the load requirements of 37 of the 39 Members and has a term extending through 2011, with Oglethorpe and LEM having the right to terminate the agreement beginning in 2002 and 2005, respectively. The other agreement involves the load requirements of the other two Members and has a term extending through 1999. Under the agreements, LEM is obligated to deliver, and Oglethorpe is obligated to take, approximately 50% of the load requirements of the participating Members. LEM has access to 50% of the output of Oglethorpe's existing generating facilities and power purchase arrangements for its use. At the request of LEM, the parties are in negotiations regardinghave discussed the future of these arrangements. LEM also has raised a dispute relatinginitiated the contractually defined binding arbitration process as to certain load projections provided by Oglethorpe to LEM in connection with the execution of the larger of the two agreements. Oglethorpe continues to receive power under the LEM agreements and believes the agreements are enforceable against LEM and LG&E (with respect to the agreement relating to the 37 Members) and LPI (with respect to the agreement relating to the other two Members). Ultimately,Even so, given LG&E's announced intention to discontinue its merchant energy trading and sales business, instead of performing itself, LEM could, pay Oglethorpe an amount to terminate the agreements or assign the agreements to another entity with the approvalconsent of Oglethorpe and the Rural Utilities Service.Service, make alternative arrangements, including assigning performance to an acceptable third party, or otherwise make Oglethorpe whole from any damages incurred as a result of termination. Oglethorpe believes that LEM, LG&E and LPI have the ability, financial and otherwise, to perform their obligations under these agreements. The current uncertainty relating to the LEM arrangements does not adversely affect Oglethorpe's ability to meet its Members' load requirements but could, in the future, affect the sources and prices for such power. If LEM, LG&E and LPI were to cease to perform their obligations under the LEM agreements or the LEM agreements arewere to be terminated, Oglethorpe expects to be able to serve its Members' needs through its existing owned and purchased capacity, supplemented by additional capacity either purchased in the wholesale market, or constructed or otherwise acquired. The absenceTermination of 8 the LEM agreements would however eliminate a source of power at contractually fixed prices and thus would introduce additional uncertainty regarding future power costs and Member rates. Oglethorpe's management does not expect the ultimate resolution of the LEM arrangements will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition or results of operations. 8 PEAKING POWER RESOURCES Although the existing long-term power marketer arrangements with LEM and Morgan Stanley Capital Group (Morgan Stanley) were designed to provide a substantial portion of the Members' load requirements during their contract terms,Peaking Power Resources As previously reported, Oglethorpe has forecasted that peakthe need for additional capacity to meet the peaking requirements of its Members. Recently, Oglethorpe has signed options to buy additional peaking power and has also arranged for the Members would exceed purchases under these arrangements over the next several yearsconstruction of a 220-megawatt, natural gas-fired combustion turbine (Smarr CT) to be located in Smarr, Georgia. The Smarr CT is being constructed by Siemens Power Corporation and has issued a request for proposals for an aggregate of 100 MWis expected to 1,100 MW to supply these additional requirements. This action was previously reported in Oglethorpe's 1997 Annual Report of Form 10-K. Oglethorpe entered into short-term contractsbe operational for the summer of 1998 and also has and is purchasing additional power on1999. The Smarr CT will be owned by a new entity, Smarr EMC, which will be owned by 36 of the open market for this period. As widely reported, peak demand and prices for power in the open market have recently hit unprecedented highs.39 Members of Oglethorpe. Oglethorpe has made and is making power purchases in the open market which have significantly increased its purchased power costs, as discussed below. Oglethorpe is continuing to evaluate alternatives for meeting its peak requirements. It expects to sign additional contracts for peaking power and may also constructcontract for or otherwise acquire additional capacity. RESULTS OF OPERATIONSSale of EnerVision, Inc. As discussed in Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997, in connection with the Corporate Restructuring, Oglethorpe created a wholly owned subsidiary, EnerVision, Inc., Tailored Energy Solutions (EnerVision), to which it transferred its marketing services business. On October 15, 1998, the senior associates of EnerVision purchased the company from Oglethorpe. EnerVision plans to continue to serve the Georgia electric cooperatives and also plans to expand its services to clients nationwide. The sale of EnerVision did not have a material effect on Oglethorpe's financial condition or results of operations. Results of Operations For the Three Months and SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and 1997 As reported in its 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Oglethorpe and the Members completed a corporate restructuring (the Corporate Restructuring) on March 11, 1997, in which Oglethorpe was divided into three specialized operating companies. Oglethorpe now operates the power supply business, Georgia Transmission Corporation (GTC) operates the transmission business and Georgia System Operations Corporation (GSOC) operates the system operations business. The Condensed Statement of Revenues and Expenses and Comprehensive Margin for the three months and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 reflects Oglethorpe's operations solely as a power supply company, whereas the Condensed Statement of Revenues and Expenses and Comprehensive Margin for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997 reflects Oglethorpe's operations as a combined power supply, transmission and system operations company through March 31, 1997, and operations solely as a power supply company thereafter. Although the Corporate Restructuring was completed on March 11, 1997, pursuant to the restructuring agreement among Oglethorpe, GTC and GSOC, all transmission-related and systems operations-related revenues were assigned to Oglethorpe, and all transmission-related and systems operations-related costs were paid or reimbursed by Oglethorpe during the period March 11, 1997 through March 31, 1997. Decreases 9 in depreciation and amortization, other operating expenses, operating margin, net interest charges and net margin from 1997 to 1998 are primarily attributable to the Corporate Restructuring. See Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 for a pro forma presentation of the Statement of Revenues and Expenses for the year ended December 31, 1997, reflecting the exclusion of the transmission and system operations businesses, as though the Corporate Restructuring had occurred at the beginning of 1997 (Note 11 of Notes to Financial Statements). OPERATING REVENUESOperating Revenues Revenues from sales to Members for the three months and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 were 29.0% 9 18.1% and 8.6%12.1% higher compared to the same periods of 1997. While capacity revenues from Members for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 compared to the same period of 1997 were reduced due to the removal of capacity revenues relating to the transmission business, this effect was more than offset by a significant increase in energy revenues from sales to Members. Such energy revenues were 93.5%38.2% higher for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 compared to the same period of 1997 and 49.6%44.3% higher for the six-monthnine-month period compared to 1997. Megawatt-hour (MWh) sales to the Members were 28.5%13.9% and 18.0%16.3% higher in the current three-month and six-monthnine-month periods compared to the same periods of 1997 due to unusuallyprolonged hot weather in late May and Juneduring the summer months of 1998. Consequently, Oglethorpe's average energy revenue per MWh from sales to Members for the three-month and six-monthnine-month periods were 50.5%21.4% and 26.7%24.1% higher in 1998 compared to 1997. This increase resulted primarily from higher purchased power costs as discussed below under "Operating Expenses". Sales to non-Members were primarily from energy sales to other utilities and power marketers, and, in 1997, pursuant to contractual arrangements with Georgia Power Company (GPC). The following table summarizes the amounts of non-Member revenues from these sources for the three months and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 and 1997:
Three Months SixNine Months Ended JuneSeptember 30, Ended JuneSeptember 30, ------------------ ------------------ 1998 1997 1998 1997 ---- ---- ---- ---- (dollars in thousands) Sales to other utilities $11,189 $ 5,629 $13,4149,212 $ 9,6635,021 $22,626 $14,691 Sales to power marketers 8,524 2,304 9,623 2,736 GPC - Power5,202 772 14,825 3,508 GPC-Power supply arrangements 0 4,763283 0 12,56512,847 ITS transmission agreements 0 0 2,186 0 2,180 ------- ------- ------- ------- Total $19,713 $12,696 $23,037 $27,150$14,414 $ 6,076 $37,451 $33,226 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Sales to other utilities represent sales made directly by Oglethorpe. Oglethorpe sells for its own account any energy in excess of the portion of its resources dedicated to Morgan Stanley Capital Group Inc. (Morgan Stanley) that is not scheduled by Morgan Stanley pursuant to its power marketer arrangement. Sales to other utilities were higher for the three-month and nine-month periods of 1998 10 compared to 1997 partly due to capacity revenues received under an agreement entered into with Alabama Electric Cooperative to sell 100 MW of capacity for the period June 1998 through December 2005 and partly due to higher energy prices experienced in the wholesale electricity markets during the summer months of 1998. Under the LEM and Morgan Stanley power marketer arrangements, sales to the power marketers represented the net energy transmitted on behalf of LEM and Morgan Stanley off-system on a daily basis from Oglethorpe's total resources. Such energy was sold to LEM and Morgan Stanley at Oglethorpe's cost, with certain limited adjustments set forth in the arrangements. The volume of sales to power marketers depends primarily on the power marketers' decisions for servicing their load requirements. The revenues from power supply arrangements with GPC were derived in 1997 from energy sales arising from dispatch situations whereby GPC caused Plant Wansley to be operated when Oglethorpe's system did not require all of its contractual entitlement to the generation. These revenues compensated Oglethorpe for its costs because, under the operating agreement (before it was amended), Oglethorpe was responsible for its share of fuel costs any time a unit operated. With the commencement of the separate dispatch of Plant Wansley as of May 1, 1997, this type of sale to GPC ended. 10 Another source of non-Member revenues in 1997 was payments received from GPC for use of the Integrated Transmission System (ITS) and related transmission interfaces. GPC compensated Oglethorpe to the extent that Oglethorpe's percentage of investment in the ITS exceeded its percentage use of the system. In such case, Oglethorpe was entitled to income as compensation for the use of its investment by the other ITS participants. As a result of the Corporate Restructuring, all of the revenues in this category have been GTC's revenues since April 1, 1997. OPERATING EXPENSESOperating Expenses Operating expenses were 42.6%26.2% and 14.9%19.2% higher in the three months and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 compared to the same periods of 1997. For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 depreciation and amortization and other operating expenses were lower due to the elimination of these expenses relating to the transmission business assumed by GTC in connection with the Corporate Restructuring. However, the changes in fuel, production and purchased power expenses did not result from the Corporate Restructuring. Production expenses were 15.2% higher for the third quarter 1998 compared to the same period of 1997. This increase primarily resulted from higher operations and maintenance costs at the various generation facilities. Purchased power costs for the three months and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 were 108.8%61.2% and 53.5%56.9% higher compared to the same periods of 1997. Purchased power capacity costs for the three months and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 were 10.4%12.3% and 10.6%12.5% lower than the same periods of 1997. ThisThese savings were primarily as a result of the elimination, effective September 1, 1997, of anothera 250-megawatt component block under the Block Power Sale Agreement between Oglethorpe and GPC. Effective September 1, 1998, Oglethorpe eliminated another 250-megawatt 11 component block. Purchased power energy costs for the three-month and six-monthnine-month periods of 1998 were 275.1%103.4% and 143.0%121.4% higher compared to the same periods of 1997 primarily as a result of significant price increases experienced in the wholesale electricity markets combined with higher volume of purchased MWhs. A total of 111.6%27.2% and 60.3%44.1% more MWhs were purchased in three-month and six-monthnine-month periods of 1998 compared to the same periods of 1997 due to unusuallyprolonged hot weather in late May and Juneduring the summer months of 1998. The average cost of purchased power energy per MWh for the three-month and six-monthnine-month periods were 77.2%59.9% and 51.6%53.7% higher in 1998 compared to 1997. The increasedhigher volumes of purchased MWhs utilized to serve Member load that was not contractually provided by the power marketers resulted in a significant increase in the average MWh cost of energy to the Members. Other operating expenses for 1997 reflect expenses for the power delivery portion of the business which was subsequently transferred to GTC in connection with the Corporate Restructuring. OTHER INCOME Other Income Total other income for the three months and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 varied slightly compared to the same periods of 1997. For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1997, the caption "Other" reflected a margin of approximately $1.7$1.3 million related to Oglethorpe's marketing support services business which was subsequently transferred to EnerVision. As discussed in "General--Sale of EnerVision, Inc." above, EnerVision was purchased from Oglethorpe by its senior associates on October 15, 1998. For the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998, EnerVision'sthe caption "Other" includes no net margin was approximately $93,000. See Oglethorpe's Annual Report on Form 10-K foror loss from the fiscal year ended December 31, 1997 for further discussionresults of operations and sale of EnerVision. INTEREST CHARGESInterest Charges Net interest charges for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 decreased compared to the same period of 1997 primarily due to the debt assumed by GTC in connection with the Corporate Restructuring. 11 NET MARGIN AND COMPREHENSIVE MARGINNet Margin and Comprehensive Margin Oglethorpe's net margin (loss) for the three months and sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 was $1.6 million$86,000 and $9.2$9.3 million, respectively, compared to $5.5 million$(872,000) and $14.9$14.1 million for the same periods of 1997. Since Oglethorpe's margin requirement is based on a ratio applied to interest charges, the reduction in interest charges resulting from the Corporate Restructuring also reduced Oglethorpe's margin requirement effective April 1, 1997. Such margin earned by Oglethorpe from the transmission and system operations functions during the first three months of 1997 was $2.3 million. The net loss for the third quarter of 1997 was the result of a capacity charge adjustment in August 1997 to return $4 million of year-to-date margins in excess of the Indenture requirements. The net margin achieved for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 is consistent with the 1998 margin requirement. AsThe margin requirement for 1998 is approximately $1 million lower than budgeted due to lower interest charges resulting from the refinancing of June 30, 1997, Oglethorpe's year-to-date net margin was in excess$430 million of the Indenture requirements. Subsequently, the Oglethorpe Board of Directors reduced capacity charges to the Members for August 1997 by $4 million to return the excess.Federal Financing Bank (FFB) debt. Comprehensive margin is now reported on the Condensed Statement of Revenues and Expenses, consistent with Statement No. 130, "Reporting Comprehensive Income", issued by the Financial 12 Accounting Standards Board. This Statement requires the reporting of all components of changes in equity on the Statement of Revenues and Expenses. For Oglethorpe, the only additional item being reported is the net change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments in available-for-sale securities. FINANCIAL CONDITIONFinancial Condition Total assets and total equity plus liabilities as of JuneSeptember 30, 1998 were $4.5 billion which was $42$25 million moreless than the total at December 31, 1997 due primarily to increase in receivables. ASSETSdepreciation of electric plant. Assets Property additions for the sixnine months ended JuneSeptember 30, 1998 totaled $15.8$25.8 million primarily for purchases of nuclear fuel and for additions, replacements and improvements to existing generation facilities. The increase in the decommissioning investment fundcash is a result of cash provided from operations exceeding financing and the decommissioning reserve resulted from earningsinvesting uses, including property additions noted above and debt service activities of the fund. An amount equal to the earnings of the fund was accrued as an increase to the decommissioning reserve. The decrease in cash resulted primarily fromwhich $23.1 million in premiums were paid to the Federal Financing Bank (FFB) resulting fromFFB in conjunction with the refinancing of $430 million of debt. The increase in receivables resulted from significantly higher energy costs billed to Members at JuneSeptember 30, 1998 compared to the receivable balance from the Members at December 31, 1997. Inventories increased primarily as a result of the coal inventories for Plants Scherer and Wansley returning to more normal levels at JuneSeptember 30, 1998 compared to lower 1997 year-end levels caused by problems associated with rail transportation. The increase in prepaymentsPrepayments and other current assets isincreased primarily due to a $5.8 million increase in estimated payments to GPC for Plant Hatch operations and maintenance costs for October 1998 compared to the resultestimate paid for January 1998. The increase related to a planned refueling outage and costs to increase the actual and licensed thermal output of $1.9 million in energy option contracts purchased forHatch Units No. 1 and being utilized to serve load during the summer of 1998.No. 2. The increase in premium and loss on reacquired debt resulted from the above-mentioned refinancing premiums paid to FFB. Equity and Liabilities Notes payable represent commercial paper issued by Oglethorpe as interim financing for costs incurred in construction of the FFB. 12 EQUITY AND LIABILITIESSmarr CT. Although Oglethorpe is providing interim financing, the facility will be owned by Smarr EMC. Oglethorpe will be reimbursed by Smarr EMC for all construction costs incurred prior to transfer of ownership, and, accordingly, has recorded all expenditures as a receivable from Smarr EMC. For further discussion of this generation facility see "General--Peaking Power Resources" above. Accounts payable increased due to the volume of purchased power activity in JuneSeptember 1998 compared to December 1997. 13 Accrued and withheld taxes increased as a result of the normal monthly accruals of property taxes, which are generally paid in the fourth quarter of the year. The decrease in other current liabilities primarily resulted from $3.0$2.3 million improvement in negative book cash balances at JuneSeptember 30, 1998 compared to 1997 year-end. MISCELLANEOUS YEARMiscellaneous Year 2000 ISSUE Oglethorpe is heavily dependent upon complex computer systems for all phases of operations.Issue Background The Year 2000 issue, which is common to most corporations, concerns the ability of certain software and databases to properly recognize date sensitive information related to the Year 2000 and thereafter. Oglethorpe is heavily dependent upon complex computer systems for all phases of power supply operations. Oglethorpe's operations include both information technology (IT) systems, such as billing systems, financial accounting systems, and human resource/payroll systems, as well as non-IT systems, such as those relating to operations of the Rocky Mountain Pumped Storage Hydroelectric Facility (Rocky Mountain), generation substations and Oglethorpe's headquarters facilities that may have embedded microprocessors. Management recognizes the seriousness of the Year 2000 issue and believes it has implementeddedicated adequate resources to address the issue. As part of its business alliance with Oglethorpe, Intellisource Services Solutions is providing administration of Oglethorpe's Year 2000 program. Oglethorpe's Board of Directors and its audit committee are monitoring this issue through periodic updates from project management. Project Phases Oglethorpe has developed and is implementing a detailed strategy to prevent any material disruption to operations and, to date, has examined most of its computer systems. Inoperations. Phase I began in April 1997 and 1998, resourcesincluded an inventory and assessment of potential Year 2000 issues. Substantially all IT and non-IT systems were committed,assessed during this phase which concluded in the fall of 1997. Phase II began in the fall of 1997 and includes remediation and testing was performedof all inventoried IT and corrective action was begunnon-IT systems. Remediation and testing efforts for all inventoried internally developed systems applications are expected to modify the affected information systems. It is anticipated that Oglethorpe may spend up to approximately $1 million to upgrade those internalbe completed by December 31, 1998. Externally purchased systems, including those relatingfinancial accounting systems, procurement and materials management systems and human resource/payroll systems are currently being evaluated for possible upgrade or replacement in 1999. Remediation and testing efforts for systems at Rocky Mountain are expected to Rocky Mountain. To date, Oglethorpe has spent approximately $300,000 on this effort. Oglethorpe expects thatbe completed by the yearMarch 31, 1999. Phase III began recently and includes contingency planning and an assessment of Year 2000 or before itreadiness of material third parties, including Oglethorpe's Members, GTC, GSOC, GPC, power marketers and vendors. This phase will have modified its systems, to the extent it considers necessary, to process years that beginbe on-going throughout 1998 and 1999. 14 Relationships with "20".Third Parties GTC and GSOC have also implemented a detailed strategy to ensure Year 2000 compliance.compliance of the systems utilized in their transmission and systems control operations. The Year 2000 compliance plans for Oglethorpe, has recently initiatedGTC and GSOC were jointly developed and are being implemented on the same schedule, as described above. Oglethorpe is in the process of gathering information from the Members regarding their Year 2000 readiness. Based on this information, Oglethorpe will implement a follow-up program to determinemonitor the status ofMembers' Year 2000 readiness of other third parties with whom Oglethorpe has material relationships. Oglethorpe has not initiatedcompliance and will further assess any program which directly addresses this issue with the 39 Members, although such effort is taking place throughimpact on Oglethorpe's risks and contingency planning. During 1998, Georgia Electric Membership Corporation (the Members' trade association) and Intellisource Services Solutions. The Southern Company (Southern) is performingSolutions have conducted workshops for the Members and have assisted some Members in their Year 2000 due diligence efforts on all generation plants which are operatedplanning by Southern's subsidiary, GPC.providing information for their use in this process. All of Oglethorpe's co-owned generating plants, except Rocky Mountain, are operated by GPC on behalf of itself as a co-owner and as agent for the other co-owners. TotalThe Southern Company (Southern) is performing Year 2000 remediation and testing on all generation plants which are operated by Southern's subsidiary, GPC. Southern estimates that total costs related to Southern'sits project on behalf of the GPC operatedGPC-operated plants are estimated towill be approximately $33$38 million, of which approximately $4$4.5 million is expected to be billed to Oglethorpe based on its ownership share of thethese generation plants. To date, Oglethorpe has paid approximately $1$1.5 million for this project. Remaining costs will be expensed primarily in 1998 and 1999. ImplementationSouthern reports that its Year 2000 program for the Georgia-based generating plants is scheduled to be completed by June 1999. Southern is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and, in accordance therewith, files reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. During Phase III of its program, Oglethorpe plans to assess the Year 2000 readiness of other significant third parties, including power marketers, other utilities and vendors of materials and services. This information will allow Oglethorpe to perform contingency planning, including assessing the need to identify alternative vendors. Project Costs In addition to the $4.5 million expected to be paid to GPC, Oglethorpe currently estimates costs of approximately $665,000 to upgrade its internal systems, including those relating to Rocky Mountain. To date, Oglethorpe has spent approximately $350,000 of the estimated $665,000 on schedule. Althoughthis effort. In addition, Oglethorpe will likely replace its current procurement and financial systems during 1999 to improve functionality and to avoid Year 2000 remediation efforts on those existing systems. The estimated cost of replacing these two systems is approximately $3.2 million. Oglethorpe's policy is to expense as incurred the degreemaintenance and modification costs of success of thisexisting software, including those associated with the Year 2000 project, on these generation plants cannot be determined at this time, GPCand to capitalize and amortize over its useful life the cost of new software. 15 Risk Assessment Oglethorpe has stated that it believes there will be no significant effect onimplemented a detailed process to minimize the plants' operations. Although Oglethorpepossibility of power supply interruptions related to Year 2000 challenges and expects that its IT and non-IT systems willto be in compliance by December 31, 1999. The most reasonably likely worst case scenario could involve service interruptions to Oglethorpe's Members and the yearMembers' retail consumers. These scenarios include the loss of a generating unit or a source of purchased power, or a disruption in transmission and distribution services by GTC or the Members. Because Oglethorpe is taking prudent steps to prepare for the Year 2000 challenges, it expects any interruptions in power supply to be isolated and short in duration. However, because of material relationships with third parties, it is too early to fully assess the impactpossibility of service interruptions to the ultimate retail consumers. There is also risk to the Members of billing and other business system failures and of some reduction in net margin caused by interruptions in service and reduced electrical demand by consumers because of their Year 2000 issue will haveissues. Oglethorpe has not fully assessed the impact of these risks on its financial condition or results of operations. 13 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED RISKSContingency Planning Oglethorpe recently began developing contingency plans for its IT and non-IT systems. This contingency planning process will also focus on non-compliance by material third parties with the goal of keeping any service interruptions to a minimum and of short duration. Forward-Looking Statements and Associated Risks This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements, including statements regarding, among other things, (i) anticipated trends in Oglethorpe's business, (ii) Oglethorpe's future power supply resources and arrangements and (iii) other management issues such as the Year 2000 issue. These forward-looking statements are based largely on Oglethorpe's current expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond Oglethorpe's control. For certain factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by these forward-looking statements, see Oglethorpe's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K in "CERTAIN FACTORS AFFECTING THE ELECTRIC UTILITY INDUSTRY" in Item 1 and "Competition" in Item 7. In light of these risks and uncertainties, there can be no assurance that events anticipated by the forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report will in fact transpire. 1416 PART II - OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION Jack L. King, age 58, was named as PresidentItem 6. Exhibits and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of Oglethorpe effective July 15, 1998. Mr. King replaces T. D. Kilgore who announced his resignationReports on June 29, 1998, to take a Senior Vice President position with Carolina Power and Light Company in Raleigh, North Carolina. Mr. King has a total of 29 years of utility experience in all phases of utility operations. Until last year, he was President of the Control Systems Division of Scientific-Atlanta, Inc. From 1987 to 1994, Mr. King was employed by Entergy Corporation, as Executive Vice President-Operations and as President of Entergy Enterprises. From 1966 to 1987, he held several management positions with Arkansas Power & Light, including Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. King's previous Board participation included GTC, Arkansas Power & Light, Mississippi Power & Light, Louisiana Power & Light, New Orleans Public Service Inc., Entergy Enterprises, System Fuels, Inc., First Pacific Networks, Entergy Systems and Services, Entergy Power, Inc., Entergy Argentina S. A., Entergy Power Development Corp. and Entergy S. A. Mr. King has a Bachelor of Science degree and Master of Science degree in Electrical Engineering from the University of Arkansas and has completed the Advanced Management Program at the Harvard Graduate School of Business. Mr. King is also serving as President and Chief Executive Officer and a Director of both GTC and GSOC. ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORMForm 8-K (a) EXHIBITS
Exhibits Number Description - ------ ----------- 27.1 Financial Data Schedule (for SEC use only).
(b) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K A reportReports on Form 8-K regarding the resignation of T. D. Kilgore as President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of Oglethorpe wasNo reports on Form 8-K were filed by Oglethorpe on Junefor the quarter ended September 30, 1998. 1517 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. Oglethorpe Power Corporation (An Electric Membership Corporation) Date: August 14,November 13, 1998 By: /s/ Jack L. King ------------------------------------------------------------------- Jack L. King President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) Date: August 14,November 13, 1998 /s/ Mac F. Oglesby ------------------------------------------------------------------- Mac F. Oglesby Treasurer and Director (Principal Financial Officer) Date: August 14,November 13, 1998 /s/ Thomas A. Smith -------------------------------------------------------------------- Thomas A. Smith Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal(Chief Financial Officer) Date: August 14,November 13, 1998 /s/ Robert D. Steele -------------------------------------------------------------------- Robert D. Steele Controller (Chief Accounting Officer) 1618