SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
| |
x☒ | Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2017 |
or |
for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019
or
|
| |
¨☐ | Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
| for the transition period from to |
Commission file number 001-14431
American States Water CompanyCompany
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
| | | | |
| California | | 95-4676679 |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| 630 E. Foothill Blvd | San Dimas | CA | | 91773-1212 |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(909) (909) 394-3600
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Not Applicable
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Commission file number 001-12008
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
|
| | | | |
| Title of each class | | Trading symbol | | Name of each exchange on which registered |
| Common shares | | AWR | | New York Stock Exchange |
Golden State Water CompanyCompany
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
| | | | |
| California | | 95-1243678 |
| (State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) | | (IRS Employer Identification No.) |
| 630 E. Foothill Blvd | San Dimas | CA | | 91773-1212 |
| (Address of Principal Executive Offices) | | (Zip Code) |
(909) (909) 394-3600
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Not Applicable
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
| | | | | |
| American States Water Company | Yes | Yes x
| | No | ¨ |
| Golden State Water Company | Yes | Yes x
| | No | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files).
|
| | | | | |
| American States Water Company | Yes | Yes x
| | No | ¨ |
| Golden State Water Company | Yes | Yes x
| | No | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
American States Water Company |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | x | | Accelerated filer | ¨
| | AcceleratedNon-accelerated filer
| ¨ | | Non-accelerated filer ¨
Smaller reporting company | ☐ | | Smaller reportingEmerging growth company¨
| ☐ |
Golden State Water Company |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | | Accelerated filer | ¨
| | AcceleratedNon-accelerated filer¨
| x | | Non-accelerated filer x
Smaller reporting company | ☐ | | Smaller reportingEmerging growth company¨
| ☐ |
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.¨
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)
|
| | | | | | |
| American States Water Company | | Yes¨ | ☐ | | No | x |
| Golden State Water Company | | Yes¨ | ☐ | | No | x |
As of November 1, 2017,August 2, 2019, the number of Common Shares outstanding of American States Water Company was 36,679,17536,831,867 shares. As of November 1, 2017,August 2, 2019, all of the 146165 outstanding Common Shares of Golden State Water Company were owned by American States Water Company.
Golden State Water Company meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction (H)(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form, in part, with the reduced disclosure format for Golden State Water Company.
AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY
and
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
PART I
Item 1. Financial Statements
General
The basic financial statements included herein have been prepared by Registrant, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring items and estimates necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim period have been made.
It is suggested that these financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto in the latest Annual Report on Form 10-K of American States Water Company and its wholly owned subsidiary, Golden State Water Company.
Filing Format
American States Water Company (“AWR”) is the parent company of Golden State Water Company (“GSWC”) and American States Utility Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("ASUS").
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q is a combined report being filed by two separate Registrants: AWR and GSWC. For more information, please see Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and the heading entitled "General" in "Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." References in this report to “Registrant” are to AWR and GSWC collectively, unless otherwise specified. GSWC makes no representations as to the information contained in this report other than with respect to itself.
Forward-Looking Information
This Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated herein contain forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the “safe harbor” from liability established by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are based on current estimates, expectations and projections about future events and assumptions regarding these events and include statements regarding management’s goals, beliefs, plans or current expectations, taking into account the information currently available to management. Forward-looking statements are not statements of historical facts. For example, when we use words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “plan,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “may” and other words that convey uncertainty of future events or outcomes, we are making forward-looking statements. We are not able to predict all the factors that may affect future results. We caution you that any forward-looking statements made by us are not guarantees of future performance and the actual results may differ materially from those in our forward-looking statements. Some of the factors that could cause future results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by our forward-looking statements or from historical results, include, but are not limited to:
the outcome of pending and future regulatory, legislative or other proceedings, investigations or audits, including decisions in GSWC's general rate cases and the results of independent audits of GSWC's construction contracting procurement practices or other independent audits of our costs;
changes in the policies and procedures of the California Public Utilities Commission ("CPUC");
timeliness of CPUC action on GSWC rates;
availability of GSWC's water supplies, which may be adversely affected by drought,increases in the frequency and duration of droughts, changes in weather patterns, in the West, contamination, and court decisions or other governmental actions restricting the use of water from the Colorado River, the California State Water Project, and/or pumping of groundwater;
liabilities of GSWC associated with the inherent risks of damage to private property and injuries to employees and the public if our or their property should come into contact with electrical current or equipment;
the breakdown or failure of equipment at GSWC's electric division if those failures result in fires or unplanned electric outages, and whether GSWC will be subject to investigations, penalties, liabilities to customers or other third parties or other costs in connection with such events;
the potential of strict liability for damages caused by GSWC's property or equipment, even if GSWC was not negligent in the operation and maintenance of that property or equipment, under a doctrine known as inverse condemnation;
the impact of storms, high winds, earthquakes, floods, mudslides, drought, wildfires and similar natural disasters, contamination or acts of terrorism or vandalism, that affect water quality and/or supply, affect customer demand, that damage or disrupt facilities, operations or information technology systems owned by us, our customers or third parties on
whom we rely or that damage the property of our customers or other third parties or cause bodily injury resulting in liabilities that we may be unable to recover from insurance, other third parties and/or the U.S. government or that the CPUC or the courts do not permit us to recover from ratepayers;
the impact on water utility operations during high fire threat conditions as a result of the Public Safety Power Shutdown program authorized by the CPUC and implemented by the electric utilities that serve GSWC facilities throughout the state;
increases in the cost of obtaining insurance or in uninsured losses that may not be recovered in rates, or under our contracts with the U.S. government, including increases due to difficulties in obtaining insurance for certain risks, such as wildfires and earthquakes in California;
increases in costs to reduce the risks associated with the increasing frequency of severe weather, including to improve the resiliency and reliability of our water production and delivery facilities and systems, and our electric transmission and distribution lines;
increases in service disruptions if severe weather and wildfires or threats of wildfire become more frequent as predicted by some scientists who study climate change;
our ability to efficiently manage GSWC capital expenditures and operating and maintenance expenses within CPUC authorized levels and timely recover our costs through rates;
the impact of opposition to GSWC rate increases on our ability to recover our costs through rates, including costs associated with construction and costs associated with damages to our property and that of pipelinesothers and injuries to connect to alternative sourcespersons arising out of water, new wells to replace wells that are no longer in service (or are otherwise inadequate to meet the needs of GSWC's customers), and other facilities to conserve or reclaim water;
more extreme weather events;
the impact of opposition by GSWC customers to conservation rate increases associated with tiered rate structuresdesign, including more stringent water-use restrictions if drought in California persists due to climate change, as well as potential future restrictions on water use mandated in California, which decreasesmay decrease adopted usage and increasesincrease customer rates;
the impact of opposition by GSWC's water and electric customers to rate increases if service is disrupted as the result of a Public Safety Power Shutdown program;
the impact of condemnation actions on future GSWC revenues and other aspects of our business if we do not receive adequate compensation for the assets acquired,taken, or recovery of all charges associated with the condemnation of thesesuch assets, andas well as the impact on future revenues if we are no longer entitled to any portion of the revenues generated from thesesuch assets;
liabilities of GSWC associated with the inherent risks of damage to private property and injuries to employees and the public if they should come into contact with electrical current or equipment, including through downed power lines or equipment malfunctions, or if safe construction and maintenance work sites are not maintained;
our ability to forecast the costs of maintaining GSWC’s aging water and electric infrastructure;
our ability to recover increases in permitting costs and costs associated with negotiating and complying with the terms of our franchise agreements with cities and counties and other demands made upon us by the cities and counties in which GSWC operates;
changes in accounting valuations and estimates, including changes resulting from our assessment of anticipated recovery of GSWC's regulatory assets, settlement of liabilities and revenues subject to refund or regulatory disallowances and the timing of such recovery, and the amounts set aside for uncollectible accounts receivable, inventory obsolescence, pensionspension and post-retirement liabilities, taxes and uninsured losses and claims, including general liability and workers' compensation claims;
changes in environmental laws, health and safety laws, and water and wastewaterrecycled water quality requirements, and increases in costs associated with complying with these laws and requirements, including costs associated with GSWC's upgrading and building new water treatment plants, GSWC's disposing of residuals from our water treatment plants, more stringent rules regarding pipeline repairs and installation, handling and storing hazardous chemicals, compliance monitoringupgrading electrical equipment to make it more resistant to extreme weather events, removal of vegetation near power lines, compliance-monitoring activities and GSWC's securing alternative water supplies of water when necessary;
our ability to obtain adequate, reliable and cost-effective supplies of chemicals, electricity, fuel, water and other raw materials that are needed for our water and wastewater operations;
our ability to attract, retain, train, motivate, develop and transition key employees;
our ability to recover the costs associated with theany contamination of GSWC’s groundwater supplies from parties responsible for the contamination or through the ratemaking process, and the time and expense incurred by us in obtaining recovery of such costs;
the breakdown or failure of equipment at GSWC's electric division that can cause fires and unplanned electric outages, and whether GSWC will be subject to investigations, penalties, and other costs in connection with such events;
adequacy of ourGSWC's electric division's power supplies and the extent to which we can manage and respond to the volatility of electricity and natural gas prices;
ourGSWC's electric division's ability to comply with the CPUC’s renewable energy procurement requirements;
changes in GSWCGSWC's long-term customer demand due to changes in customer usage patterns as a result of conservation efforts, regulatory changes affecting demand such as mandatory restrictions on water use, new landscaping or irrigation requirements, recycling of water by customers or purchase of recycled water supplied by other parties, unanticipated population growth or decline, changes in climate conditions, general economic and financial market conditions and cost increases, which may impact our long-term operating revenues if we are unable to secure rate increases if growth in the residential customer base does not occur to the extent necessaryan amount sufficient to offset the decline in per-customer residential usage or GSWC's customer base declines as a result of condemnation actions or the use of recycled or reclaimed water from other third-party sources;
reduced demand;
changes in accounting treatment for regulated utilities;
effects of changes in, or interpretations of, tax laws, rates or policies;
changes in estimates used in ASUS’s cost-to-cost method for revenue recognition under the percentage of completion method of accounting for certain construction activities;
termination, in whole or in part, of one or more of ourASUS's military utility privatization contracts to provide water and/or wastewater services at military bases for the convenience of the U.S. government or for default;
suspension or debarment of ASUS for a period of time from contracting with the government due to violations of laws or regulations in connection with military utility privatization activities;
delays by the U.S. government in making timely payments to ASUS for water and/or wastewater services or construction activities at military bases because of fiscal uncertainties over the funding of the U.S. government or otherwise;
delays in ASUS obtaining economic price or equitable adjustments to our prices on one or more of our contracts to provide water and/or wastewater services at military bases;
disallowance of costs on any of ourASUS's contracts to provide water and/or wastewater services at military bases because of audits, cost reviews or investigations by contracting agencies;
inaccurate assumptions used by ASUS in preparing bids in our contracted services business or negotiating periodic price adjustments;
business;
failure of the wastewater systems that we operateASUS operates on military bases resulting in untreated wastewater or contaminants spilling into nearby properties, streams or rivers;
rivers, a risk which may increase if flooding and rainfall become more frequent or severe as a result of climate change;
failure to comply with the terms of our military privatization contracts;
failure of any of our subcontractors to perform services for usASUS in accordance with the terms of our military privatization contracts;
competition for new military privatization contracts;
issues with the implementation, maintenance or upgrading of our information technology systems;
general economic conditions which may impact our ability to recover infrastructure investments and operating costs from customers;
explosions, fires, accidents, mechanical breakdowns, the disruption of information technology and telecommunication systems, human error and similar events that may occur while operating and maintaining water and electric systems in California or operating and maintaining water and wastewater systems on military bases under varying geographic conditions;
the impact of storms, earthquakes, floods, mudslides, drought, wildfires, disease and similar natural disasters, or acts of terrorism or vandalism, that affect customer demand or that damage or disrupt facilities, operations or information technology systems owned by us, our customers or third parties on whom we rely;
potential costs, lost revenues, or other consequences resulting from misappropriation of assets or sensitive information, corruption of data, or operational disruption due to a cyber-attack or other cyber incident;
increases in the cost of obtaining insurance or in uninsured losses that may not be recovered in rates, or under our contracts with the U.S. government, including increases due to difficulties in obtaining insurance for certain risks, such as wildfires and earthquakes in California;
restrictive covenants in our debt instruments or changes to our credit ratings on current or future debt that may increase our financing costs or affect our ability to borrow or make payments on our debt; and
our ability to access capital markets and other sources of credit in a timely manner on acceptable terms.
Please consider our forward-looking statements in light of these risks (which are more fully disclosed in our 20162018 Annual Report on Form 10-K) as you read this Form 10-Q. We qualify all our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.
AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
(Unaudited)
| | | (in thousands) | | September 30,
2017 | | December 31, 2016 | | June 30,
2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| Property, Plant and Equipment | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Regulated utility plant, at cost | | $ | 1,699,631 |
| | $ | 1,670,238 |
| | $ | 1,898,157 |
| | $ | 1,832,336 |
|
| Non-utility property, at cost | | 14,826 |
| | 13,441 |
| | 30,201 |
| | 25,829 |
|
| Total | | 1,714,457 |
| | 1,683,679 |
| | 1,928,358 |
| | 1,858,165 |
|
| Less - Accumulated depreciation | | (532,841 | ) | | (532,753 | ) | | (572,695 | ) | | (561,855 | ) |
| Net property, plant and equipment | | 1,181,616 |
| | 1,150,926 |
| | 1,355,663 |
| | 1,296,310 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other Property and Investments | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Goodwill | | 1,116 |
| | 1,116 |
| | 1,116 |
| | 1,116 |
|
| Other property and investments | | 23,346 |
| | 20,836 |
| | 27,312 |
| | 25,356 |
|
| Total other property and investments | | 24,462 |
| | 21,952 |
| | 28,428 |
| | 26,472 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Current Assets | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | | 6,661 |
| | 436 |
| | 1,516 |
| | 7,141 |
|
| Accounts receivable — customers (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $770 in 2017 and $702 in 2016) | | 29,392 |
| | 19,993 |
| |
| Accounts receivable — customers (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $845 in 2019 and $892 in 2018) | | | 24,245 |
| | 23,395 |
|
| Unbilled receivable | | 25,833 |
| | 24,391 |
| | 18,064 |
| | 23,588 |
|
| Receivable from the U.S. government | | 7,112 |
| | 8,467 |
| | 20,949 |
| | 21,543 |
|
| Other accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $219 in 2017 and $62 in 2016) | | 4,945 |
| | 3,151 |
| |
| Other accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $59 in 2019 and 2018) | | | 3,065 |
| | 3,103 |
|
| Income taxes receivable | | 74 |
| | 17,867 |
| | 1,545 |
| | 2,164 |
|
| Materials and supplies, at average cost | | 5,377 |
| | 4,294 |
| | 6,189 |
| | 5,775 |
|
| Regulatory assets — current | | 27,385 |
| | 43,296 |
| | 13,671 |
| | 16,527 |
|
| Prepayments and other current assets | | 5,248 |
| | 3,735 |
| | 7,005 |
| | 6,063 |
|
| Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on contracts | | 34,636 |
| | 41,245 |
| |
| Contract assets | | | 25,776 |
| | 22,169 |
|
| Total current assets | | 146,663 |
| | 166,875 |
| | 122,025 |
| | 131,468 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Regulatory and Other Assets | | |
| | |
| |
| Regulatory assets | | 103,521 |
| | 102,985 |
| |
| Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on contracts | | 21,720 |
| | 22,687 |
| |
| Other Assets | | | |
| | |
|
| Receivable from the U.S. government | | | 38,910 |
| | 39,583 |
|
| Contract assets | | | 5,781 |
| | 2,278 |
|
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | | | 11,058 |
| | — |
|
| Other | | 8,504 |
| | 5,068 |
| | 5,418 |
| | 5,322 |
|
| Total regulatory and other assets | | 133,745 |
| | 130,740 |
| | 61,167 |
| | 47,183 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total Assets | | $ | 1,486,486 |
| | $ | 1,470,493 |
| | $ | 1,567,283 |
| | $ | 1,501,433 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
(Unaudited)
| | | (in thousands) | | September 30,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 | |
| (in thousands, except number of shares) | | | June 30,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| Capitalization | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Common shares, no par value | | | | | | | | |
| Authorized: 60,000,000 shares | | | | | | | | |
| Outstanding: 36,679,175 shares in 2017 and 36,571,360 shares in 2016 | | $ | 249,468 |
| | $ | 247,232 |
| |
| Outstanding: 36,831,696 shares in 2019 and 36,757,842 shares in 2018 | | | $ | 254,969 |
| | $ | 253,689 |
|
| Earnings reinvested in the business | | 276,344 |
| | 247,065 |
| | 323,818 |
| | 304,534 |
|
| Total common shareholders’ equity | | 525,812 |
| | 494,297 |
| | 578,787 |
| | 558,223 |
|
| Long-term debt | | 320,949 |
| | 320,981 |
| | 281,014 |
| | 281,087 |
|
| Total capitalization | | 846,761 |
| | 815,278 |
| | 859,801 |
| | 839,310 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Current Liabilities | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Notes payable to bank | | 46,000 |
| | 90,000 |
| |
| Long-term debt — current | | 333 |
| | 330 |
| | 339 |
| | 40,320 |
|
| Accounts payable | | 53,804 |
| | 43,724 |
| | 55,645 |
| | 59,532 |
|
| Income taxes payable | | 6,013 |
| | 149 |
| | 3,104 |
| | 360 |
|
| Accrued other taxes | | 9,195 |
| | 9,112 |
| | 8,140 |
| | 10,094 |
|
| Accrued employee expenses | | 11,211 |
| | 12,304 |
| | 12,363 |
| | 13,842 |
|
| Accrued interest | | 6,576 |
| | 3,864 |
| | 3,109 |
| | 3,865 |
|
| Unrealized loss on purchased power contracts | | 3,837 |
| | 4,901 |
| | 267 |
| | 311 |
|
| Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on contracts | | 2,466 |
| | 2,263 |
| |
| Contract liabilities | | | 11,564 |
| | 7,530 |
|
| Operating lease liabilities | | | 1,808 |
| | — |
|
| Other | | 12,434 |
| | 11,297 |
| | 10,007 |
| | 10,731 |
|
| Total current liabilities | | 151,869 |
| | 177,944 |
| | 106,346 |
| | 146,585 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other Credits | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Notes payable to bank | | | 185,500 |
| | 95,500 |
|
| Advances for construction | | 67,438 |
| | 69,722 |
| | 63,582 |
| | 66,305 |
|
| Contributions in aid of construction - net | | 123,569 |
| | 120,518 |
| | 128,898 |
| | 124,385 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | | 234,719 |
| | 224,530 |
| | 114,418 |
| | 114,216 |
|
| Regulatory liabilities | | | 26,955 |
| | 44,867 |
|
| Unamortized investment tax credits | | 1,453 |
| | 1,529 |
| | 1,331 |
| | 1,367 |
|
| Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits | | 46,868 |
| | 49,856 |
| | 59,889 |
| | 57,636 |
|
| Operating lease liabilities | | | 9,548 |
| | — |
|
| Other | | 13,809 |
| | 11,116 |
| | 11,015 |
| | 11,262 |
|
| Total other credits | | 487,856 |
| | 477,271 |
| | 601,136 |
| | 515,538 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8) | |
|
| |
|
| |
| Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9) | | |
|
| |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total Capitalization and Liabilities | | $ | 1,486,486 |
| | $ | 1,470,493 |
| | $ | 1,567,283 |
| | $ | 1,501,433 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED
ENDED SEPTEMBERJUNE 30, 20172019 AND 20162018
(Unaudited)
| | | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Three months ended June 30, |
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Operating Revenues | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Water | | $ | 91,919 |
| | $ | 90,617 |
| | $ | 88,140 |
| | $ | 76,733 |
|
| Electric | | 7,994 |
| | 8,146 |
| | 7,408 |
| | 7,841 |
|
| Contracted services | | 24,505 |
| | 25,043 |
| | 29,099 |
| | 22,327 |
|
| Total operating revenues | | 124,418 |
| | 123,806 |
| | 124,647 |
| | 106,901 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Water purchased | | 20,576 |
| | 19,631 |
| | 18,762 |
| | 16,608 |
|
| Power purchased for pumping | | 2,913 |
| | 2,988 |
| | 1,982 |
| | 2,231 |
|
| Groundwater production assessment | | 5,870 |
| | 4,482 |
| | 4,640 |
| | 4,534 |
|
| Power purchased for resale | | 2,439 |
| | 2,394 |
| | 2,391 |
| | 2,384 |
|
| Supply cost balancing accounts | | (4,621 | ) | | (4,213 | ) | | 1,207 |
| | (2,029 | ) |
| Other operation | | 7,657 |
| | 7,448 |
| | 7,708 |
| | 7,782 |
|
| Administrative and general | | 21,790 |
| | 19,768 |
| | 19,529 |
| | 20,213 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 9,854 |
| | 9,486 |
| | 6,655 |
| | 10,010 |
|
| Maintenance | | 3,222 |
| | 4,203 |
| | 3,053 |
| | 3,670 |
|
| Property and other taxes | | 4,475 |
| | 4,317 |
| | 4,870 |
| | 4,372 |
|
| ASUS construction | | 11,693 |
| | 13,685 |
| | 14,532 |
| | 11,576 |
|
| Gain on sale of assets | | (17 | ) | | — |
| | (112 | ) | | (18 | ) |
| Total operating expenses | | 85,851 |
| | 84,189 |
| | 85,217 |
| | 81,333 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Income | | 38,567 |
| | 39,617 |
| | 39,430 |
| | 25,568 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other Income and Expenses | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest expense | | (5,775 | ) | | (5,730 | ) | | (6,282 | ) | | (6,048 | ) |
| Interest income | | 321 |
| | 206 |
| | 876 |
| | 636 |
|
| Other, net | | 401 |
| | 254 |
| | 591 |
| | 579 |
|
| Total other income and expenses, net | | (5,053 | ) | | (5,270 | ) | | (4,815 | ) | | (4,833 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income before income tax expense | | 33,514 |
| | 34,347 |
| | 34,615 |
| | 20,735 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income tax expense | | 12,508 |
| | 12,708 |
| | 7,831 |
| | 4,387 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income | | $ | 21,006 |
| | $ | 21,639 |
| | $ | 26,784 |
| | $ | 16,348 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding | | 36,659 |
| | 36,561 |
| | 36,804 |
| | 36,733 |
|
| Basic Earnings Per Common Share | | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.44 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted Average Number of Diluted Shares | | 36,856 |
| | 36,762 |
| | 36,963 |
| | 36,912 |
|
| Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share | | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.44 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends Declared Per Common Share | | $ | 0.255 |
| | $ | 0.224 |
| | $ | 0.275 |
| | $ | 0.255 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE NINESIX MONTHS ENDED
ENDED SEPTEMBERJUNE 30, 20172019 AND 20162018
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, |
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Operating Revenues | | |
| | |
|
| Water | | $ | 239,057 |
| | $ | 237,987 |
|
| Electric | | 26,108 |
| | 26,420 |
|
| Contracted services | | 71,258 |
| | 64,880 |
|
| Total operating revenues | | 336,423 |
| | 329,287 |
|
| | | | | |
| Operating Expenses | | |
| | |
|
| Water purchased | | 50,619 |
| | 49,265 |
|
| Power purchased for pumping | | 6,667 |
| | 6,752 |
|
| Groundwater production assessment | | 14,176 |
| | 11,150 |
|
| Power purchased for resale | | 7,847 |
| | 7,481 |
|
| Supply cost balancing accounts | | (11,663 | ) | | (10,145 | ) |
| Other operation | | 21,989 |
| | 21,331 |
|
| Administrative and general | | 62,534 |
| | 61,829 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 29,184 |
| | 28,878 |
|
| Maintenance | | 10,292 |
| | 11,908 |
|
| Property and other taxes | | 13,386 |
| | 12,863 |
|
| ASUS construction | | 34,589 |
| | 35,351 |
|
| Gain on sale of assets | | (8,318 | ) | | — |
|
| Total operating expenses | | 231,302 |
| | 236,663 |
|
| | | | | |
| Operating Income | | 105,121 |
| | 92,624 |
|
| | | | | |
| Other Income and Expenses | | |
| | |
|
| Interest expense | | (17,606 | ) | | (16,956 | ) |
| Interest income | | 1,200 |
| | 568 |
|
| Other, net | | 1,454 |
| | 872 |
|
| Total other income and expenses, net | | (14,952 | ) | | (15,516 | ) |
| | | | | |
| Income before income tax expense | | 90,169 |
| | 77,108 |
|
| | | | | |
| Income tax expense | | 33,670 |
| | 28,577 |
|
| | | | | |
| Net Income | | $ | 56,499 |
| | $ | 48,531 |
|
| | | | | |
| Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding | | 36,625 |
| | 36,546 |
|
| Basic Earnings Per Common Share | | $ | 1.53 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
|
| | | | | |
| Weighted Average Number of Diluted Shares | | 36,813 |
| | 36,743 |
|
| Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share | | $ | 1.53 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
|
| | | | | |
| Dividends Declared Per Common Share | | $ | 0.739 |
| | $ | 0.672 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, |
| (in thousands) | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | | |
| | |
|
| Net income | | $ | 56,499 |
| | $ | 48,531 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | |
| | |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 29,365 |
| | 29,080 |
|
| Provision for doubtful accounts | | 720 |
| | 420 |
|
| Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | | 9,004 |
| | 11,295 |
|
| Stock-based compensation expense | | 2,303 |
| | 1,965 |
|
| Gain on sale of assets | | (8,318 | ) | | — |
|
| Other — net | | (802 | ) | | (360 | ) |
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | |
| | |
|
| Accounts receivable — customers | | (10,683 | ) | | (4,471 | ) |
| Unbilled receivable | | (1,442 | ) | | (1,139 | ) |
| Other accounts receivable | | (1,951 | ) | | 36 |
|
| Receivables from the U.S. government | | 1,355 |
| | (3,623 | ) |
| Materials and supplies | | (1,083 | ) | | 682 |
|
| Prepayments and other assets | | (1,401 | ) | | (1,149 | ) |
| Costs and estimated earnings in excess of billings on contracts | | 7,576 |
| | (8,274 | ) |
| Regulatory assets | | 10,344 |
| | (13,823 | ) |
| Accounts payable | | 5,337 |
| | (1,545 | ) |
| Income taxes receivable/payable | | 23,657 |
| | 16,653 |
|
| Billings in excess of costs and estimated earnings on contracts | | 203 |
| | 1,777 |
|
| Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefits | | (2,285 | ) | | (1,529 | ) |
| Other liabilities | | 1,831 |
| | 2,983 |
|
| Net cash provided | | 120,229 |
| | 77,509 |
|
| | | | | |
| Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | |
| | |
|
| Capital expenditures | | (77,896 | ) | | (99,907 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of assets | | 34,324 |
| | — |
|
| Other investing activities | | (1,299 | ) | | (1,448 | ) |
| Net cash used | | (44,871 | ) | | (101,355 | ) |
| | | | | |
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | |
| | |
|
| Proceeds from stock option exercises | | 884 |
| | 210 |
|
| Receipt of advances for and contributions in aid of construction | | 6,132 |
| | 2,902 |
|
| Refunds on advances for construction | | (3,477 | ) | | (3,449 | ) |
| Retirement or repayments of long-term debt | | (320 | ) | | (305 | ) |
| Net change in notes payable to banks | | (44,000 | ) | | 49,000 |
|
| Dividends paid | | (27,064 | ) | | (24,558 | ) |
| Other financing activities | | (1,288 | ) | | (1,529 | ) |
| Net cash (used) provided | | (69,133 | ) | | 22,271 |
|
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | 6,225 |
| | (1,575 | ) |
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | 436 |
| | 4,364 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 6,661 |
| | $ | 2,789 |
|
| | | | | |
| Non-cash transactions: | | | | |
| Accrued payables for investment in utility plant | | $ | 21,978 |
| | $ | 19,843 |
|
| Property installed by developers and conveyed | | $ | 1,796 |
| | $ | 4,853 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | | September 30,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| Utility Plant | | |
| | |
|
| Utility plant, at cost | | $ | 1,699,631 |
| | $ | 1,670,238 |
|
| Less - Accumulated depreciation | | (524,288 | ) | | (524,927 | ) |
| Net utility plant | | 1,175,343 |
| | 1,145,311 |
|
| | | | | |
| Other Property and Investments | | 21,232 |
| | 18,719 |
|
| | | | | |
| Current Assets | | |
| | |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | | 6,254 |
| | 209 |
|
| Accounts receivable-customers (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $770 in 2017 and $702 in 2016) | | 29,392 |
| | 19,993 |
|
| Unbilled receivable | | 20,838 |
| | 17,700 |
|
| Other accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $59 in 2017 and 2016) | | 3,617 |
| | 1,959 |
|
| Income taxes receivable from Parent | | — |
| | 21,856 |
|
| Materials and supplies, at average cost | | 4,615 |
| | 3,724 |
|
| Regulatory assets — current | | 27,385 |
| | 43,296 |
|
| Prepayments and other current assets | | 4,594 |
| | 3,520 |
|
| Total current assets | | 96,695 |
| | 112,257 |
|
| | | | | |
| Regulatory and Other Assets | | |
| | |
|
| Regulatory assets | | 103,521 |
| | 102,985 |
|
| Other | | 8,407 |
| | 4,906 |
|
| Total regulatory and other assets | | 111,928 |
| | 107,891 |
|
| | | | | |
| Total Assets | | $ | 1,405,198 |
| | $ | 1,384,178 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | | September 30,
2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| Capitalization | | |
| | |
|
| Common Shares, no par value: | | | | |
| Authorized: 1,000 shares | | | | |
| Outstanding: 146 shares in 2017 and 2016 | | $ | 241,684 |
| | $ | 240,482 |
|
| Earnings reinvested in the business | | 234,299 |
| | 206,288 |
|
| Total common shareholder’s equity | | 475,983 |
| | 446,770 |
|
| Long-term debt | | 320,949 |
| | 320,981 |
|
| Total capitalization | | 796,932 |
| | 767,751 |
|
| | | | | |
| Current Liabilities | | |
| | |
|
| Inter-company payable | | 29,103 |
| | 61,726 |
|
| Long-term debt — current | | 333 |
| | 330 |
|
| Accounts payable | | 45,415 |
| | 34,648 |
|
| Income taxes payable to Parent | | 1,136 |
| | — |
|
| Accrued other taxes | | 9,078 |
| | 8,870 |
|
| Accrued employee expenses | | 9,809 |
| | 10,983 |
|
| Accrued interest | | 6,305 |
| | 3,588 |
|
| Unrealized loss on purchased power contracts | | 3,837 |
| | 4,901 |
|
| Other | | 12,088 |
| | 10,925 |
|
| Total current liabilities | | 117,104 |
| | 135,971 |
|
| | | | | |
| Other Credits | | |
| | |
|
| Advances for construction | | 67,438 |
| | 69,722 |
|
| Contributions in aid of construction — net | | 123,569 |
| | 120,518 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | | 238,110 |
| | 227,798 |
|
| Unamortized investment tax credits | | 1,453 |
| | 1,529 |
|
| Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits | | 46,868 |
| | 49,856 |
|
| Other | | 13,724 |
| | 11,033 |
|
| Total other credits | | 491,162 |
| | 480,456 |
|
| | | | | |
| Commitments and Contingencies (Note 8) | |
|
| |
|
|
| | | | | |
| Total Capitalization and Liabilities | | $ | 1,405,198 |
| | $ | 1,384,178 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE THREE MONTHS
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017 AND 2016
(Unaudited)
| | | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (in thousands) | | 2017 | | 2016 | |
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Operating Revenues | | | | | | |
| | |
|
| Water | | $ | 91,919 |
| | $ | 90,617 |
| | $ | 152,863 |
| | $ | 141,145 |
|
| Electric | | 7,994 |
| | 8,146 |
| | 18,037 |
| | 17,673 |
|
| Contracted services | | | 55,480 |
| | 42,811 |
|
| Total operating revenues | | 99,913 |
| | 98,763 |
| | 226,380 |
| | 201,629 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses | | | | | | |
| | |
|
| Water purchased | | 20,576 |
| | 19,631 |
| | 31,902 |
| | 30,215 |
|
| Power purchased for pumping | | 2,913 |
| | 2,988 |
| | 3,520 |
| | 3,924 |
|
| Groundwater production assessment | | 5,870 |
| | 4,482 |
| | 8,386 |
| | 9,185 |
|
| Power purchased for resale | | 2,439 |
| | 2,394 |
| | 6,095 |
| | 5,792 |
|
| Supply cost balancing accounts | | (4,621 | ) | | (4,213 | ) | | (165 | ) | | (5,898 | ) |
| Other operation | | 6,493 |
| | 6,604 |
| | 16,279 |
| | 15,770 |
|
| Administrative and general | | 16,847 |
| | 15,833 |
| | 41,201 |
| | 40,506 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 9,509 |
| | 9,240 |
| | 17,487 |
| | 19,676 |
|
| Maintenance | | 2,692 |
| | 3,644 |
| | 5,619 |
| | 7,499 |
|
| Property and other taxes | | 4,144 |
| | 4,018 |
| | 9,766 |
| | 9,171 |
|
| ASUS construction | | | 26,777 |
| | 21,548 |
|
| Gain on sale of assets | | (17 | ) | | — |
| | (112 | ) | | (18 | ) |
| Total operating expenses | | 66,845 |
| | 64,621 |
| | 166,755 |
| | 157,370 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Income | | 33,068 |
| | 34,142 |
| | 59,625 |
| | 44,259 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other Income and Expenses | | | | | | |
| | |
|
| Interest expense | | (5,638 | ) | | (5,673 | ) | | (12,599 | ) | | (11,971 | ) |
| Interest income | | 318 |
| | 200 |
| | 1,818 |
| | 1,172 |
|
| Other, net | | 401 |
| | 255 |
| | 1,933 |
| | 621 |
|
| Total other income and expenses, net | | (4,919 | ) | | (5,218 | ) | | (8,848 | ) | | (10,178 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income before income tax expense | | 28,149 |
| | 28,924 |
| | 50,777 |
| | 34,081 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income tax expense | | 10,813 |
| | 11,041 |
| | 11,141 |
| | 6,951 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income | | $ | 17,336 |
| | $ | 17,883 |
| | $ | 39,636 |
| | $ | 27,130 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding | | | 36,788 |
| | 36,723 |
|
| Basic Earnings Per Common Share | | | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 0.74 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Weighted Average Number of Diluted Shares | | | 36,942 |
| | 36,896 |
|
| Fully Diluted Earnings Per Common Share | | | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
|
| | | | | | |
| Dividends Declared Per Common Share | | | $ | 0.550 |
| | $ | 0.510 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2019
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 |
| | | Common Shares | | Reinvested | | |
| | | Number | | | | Earnings | | |
| | | of | | | | in the | | |
| (in thousands) | | Shares | | Amount | | Business | | Total |
| Balances at December 31, 2018 | | 36,758 |
| | $ | 253,689 |
| | $ | 304,534 |
| | $ | 558,223 |
|
| Add: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net income | | | | | | 12,852 |
| | 12,852 |
|
| Exercise of stock options and other issuances of Common Shares | | 37 | | 75 |
| | | | 75 |
|
| Stock-based compensation, net of taxes paid from shares withheld from employees related to net share settlements (Note 4) | | | | 463 |
| | | | 463 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | 70 |
| | | | 70 |
|
| Deduct: | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends on Common Shares | | | | | | 10,113 |
| | 10,113 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | | | 70 |
| | 70 |
|
| Balances at March 31, 2019 | | 36,795 |
| | $ | 254,297 |
| | $ | 307,203 |
| | $ | 561,500 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Add: | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | 26,784 |
| | 26,784 |
|
| Exercise of stock options and other issuances of Common Shares | | 37 |
| | 291 |
| | | | 291 |
|
| Stock-based compensation, net of taxes paid from shares withheld from employees related to net share settlements (Note 4) | | | | 331 |
| | | | 331 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | 50 |
| | | | 50 |
|
| Deduct: | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends on Common Shares | | | | | | 10,119 |
| | 10,119 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | | | 50 |
| | 50 |
|
| Balances at June 30, 2019 | | 36,832 |
| | $ | 254,969 |
| | $ | 323,818 |
| | $ | 578,787 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN COMMON SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2018
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
| | | Common Shares | | Reinvested | | |
| | | Number | | | | Earnings | | |
| | | of | | | | in the | | |
| (in thousands) | | Shares | | Amount | | Business | | Total |
| Balances at December 31, 2017 | | 36,681 |
| | $ | 250,124 |
| | $ | 279,821 |
| | $ | 529,945 |
|
| Add: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net income | | | | | | 10,782 |
| | 10,782 |
|
| Exercise of stock options and other issuances of Common Shares | | 52 | | 340 |
| | | | 340 |
|
| Taxes paid from shares withheld from employees related to net share settlements, net of stock-based compensation (Note 4) | | | | (181 | ) | | | | (181 | ) |
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | 56 |
| | | | 56 |
|
| Deduct: | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends on Common Shares | | | | | | 9,362 |
| | 9,362 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | | | 56 |
| | 56 |
|
| Balances at March 31, 2018 | | 36,733 |
| | $ | 250,339 |
| | $ | 281,185 |
| | $ | 531,524 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Add: | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | 16,348 |
| | 16,348 |
|
| Stock-based compensation, net of taxes paid from shares withheld from employees related to net share settlements (Note 4) | | | | 705 |
| | | | 705 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | 48 |
| | | | 48 |
|
| Deduct: | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends on Common Shares | | | | | | 9,367 |
| | 9,367 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | | | 48 |
| | 48 |
|
| Balances at June 30, 2018 | | 36,733 |
| | $ | 251,092 |
| | $ | 288,118 |
| | $ | 539,210 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2019 AND 2018
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Six Months Ended
June 30, |
| (in thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | | |
| | |
|
| Net income | | $ | 39,636 |
| | $ | 27,130 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | |
| | |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 17,640 |
| | 19,797 |
|
| Provision for doubtful accounts | | 281 |
| | 322 |
|
| Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | | (1,703 | ) | | (1,565 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation expense | | 2,179 |
| | 1,637 |
|
| Gain on sale of assets | | (112 | ) | | (18 | ) |
| Gain on investments held in a trust | | (2,187 | ) | | (97 | ) |
| Other — net | | 130 |
| | 136 |
|
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | |
| | |
|
| Accounts receivable — customers | | (1,129 | ) | | (835 | ) |
| Unbilled receivable | | 5,524 |
| | 1,730 |
|
| Other accounts receivable | | 36 |
| | 3,612 |
|
| Receivables from the U.S. government | | (2,909 | ) | | (14,507 | ) |
| Materials and supplies | | (414 | ) | | (569 | ) |
| Prepayments and other assets | | 1,901 |
| | (1,171 | ) |
| Contract assets | | (2,934 | ) | | 12,631 |
|
| Regulatory assets | | (13,932 | ) | | 12,240 |
|
| Accounts payable | | 83 |
| | (3,473 | ) |
| Income taxes receivable/payable | | 3,363 |
| | 4,820 |
|
| Contract liabilities | | 4,034 |
| | 3,132 |
|
| Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits | | 3,116 |
| | 2,495 |
|
| Other liabilities | | (7,936 | ) | | (2,376 | ) |
| Net cash provided | | 44,667 |
| | 65,071 |
|
| | | | | |
| Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | |
| | |
|
| Capital expenditures | | (81,155 | ) | | (58,782 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of assets | | 102 |
| | 29 |
|
| Other investing activities | | 184 |
| | 98 |
|
| Net cash used | | (80,869 | ) | | (58,655 | ) |
| | | | | |
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | |
| | |
|
| Proceeds from stock option exercises | | 366 |
| | 340 |
|
| Receipt of advances for and contributions in aid of construction | | 6,290 |
| | 3,343 |
|
| Refunds on advances for construction | | (4,074 | ) | | (2,616 | ) |
| Retirement or repayments of long-term debt | | (40,200 | ) | | (197 | ) |
| Net change in notes payable to banks | | 90,000 |
| | 18,000 |
|
| Dividends paid | | (20,232 | ) | | (18,729 | ) |
| Other financing activities | | (1,573 | ) | | (1,214 | ) |
| Net cash provided (used) | | 30,577 |
| | (1,073 | ) |
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | (5,625 | ) | | 5,343 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | 7,141 |
| | 214 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 1,516 |
| | $ | 5,557 |
|
| | | | | |
| Non-cash transactions: | | | | |
| Accrued payables for investment in utility plant | | $ | 23,433 |
| | $ | 16,016 |
|
| Property installed by developers and conveyed | | $ | 1,241 |
| | $ | 929 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
ASSETS
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands) | | June 30,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| Utility Plant | | |
| | |
|
| Utility plant, at cost | | $ | 1,898,157 |
| | $ | 1,832,336 |
|
| Less - Accumulated depreciation | | (560,733 | ) | | (551,244 | ) |
| Net utility plant | | 1,337,424 |
| | 1,281,092 |
|
| | | | | |
| Other Property and Investments | | 25,225 |
| | 23,263 |
|
| | | | | |
| Current Assets | | |
| | |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents | | 541 |
| | 4,187 |
|
| Accounts receivable-customers (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $845 in 2019 and $892 in 2018) | | 24,245 |
| | 23,395 |
|
| Unbilled receivable | | 17,234 |
| | 17,892 |
|
| Other accounts receivable (less allowance for doubtful accounts of $59 in 2019 and 2018) | | 1,890 |
| | 1,959 |
|
| Income taxes receivable from Parent | | — |
| | 5,617 |
|
| Materials and supplies, at average cost | | 5,032 |
| | 4,797 |
|
| Regulatory assets — current | | 13,671 |
| | 16,527 |
|
| Prepayments and other current assets | | 5,586 |
| | 5,275 |
|
| Total current assets | | 68,199 |
| | 79,649 |
|
| | | | | |
| Other Assets | | |
| | |
|
| Operating lease right-of-use assets | | 10,432 |
| | — |
|
| Other | | 5,319 |
| | 5,218 |
|
| Total other assets | | 15,751 |
| | 5,218 |
|
| | | | | |
| Total Assets | | $ | 1,446,599 |
| | $ | 1,389,222 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
BALANCE SHEETS
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| (in thousands, except number of shares) | | June 30,
2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| Capitalization | | |
| | |
|
| Common Shares, no par value: | | | | |
| Authorized: 1,000 shares | | | | |
| Outstanding: 165 shares in 2019 and 2018 | | $ | 293,345 |
| | $ | 292,412 |
|
| Earnings reinvested in the business | | 222,179 |
| | 211,163 |
|
| Total common shareholder’s equity | | 515,524 |
| | 503,575 |
|
| Long-term debt | | 281,014 |
| | 281,087 |
|
| Total capitalization | | 796,538 |
| | 784,662 |
|
| | | | | |
| Current Liabilities | | |
| | |
|
| Long-term debt — current | | 339 |
| | 40,320 |
|
| Accounts payable | | 47,022 |
| | 47,865 |
|
| Accrued other taxes | | 7,886 |
| | 9,911 |
|
| Accrued employee expenses | | 10,708 |
| | 11,910 |
|
| Accrued interest | | 2,809 |
| | 3,550 |
|
| Income taxes payable to Parent | | 276 |
| | — |
|
| Unrealized loss on purchased power contracts | | 267 |
| | 311 |
|
| Operating lease liabilities | | 1,484 |
| | — |
|
| Other | | 9,399 |
| | 9,432 |
|
| Total current liabilities | | 80,190 |
| | 123,299 |
|
| | | | | |
| Other Credits | | |
| | |
|
| Intercompany payable to Parent | | 151,289 |
| | 57,289 |
|
| Advances for construction | | 63,582 |
| | 66,305 |
|
| Contributions in aid of construction — net | | 128,898 |
| | 124,385 |
|
| Deferred income taxes | | 117,733 |
| | 118,241 |
|
| Regulatory liabilities | | 26,955 |
| | 44,867 |
|
| Unamortized investment tax credits | | 1,331 |
| | 1,367 |
|
| Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits | | 59,889 |
| | 57,636 |
|
| Operating lease liabilities | | 9,283 |
| | — |
|
| Other | | 10,911 |
| | 11,171 |
|
| Total other credits | | 569,871 |
| | 481,261 |
|
| | | | | |
| Commitments and Contingencies (Note 9) | |
|
| |
|
|
| | | | | |
| Total Capitalization and Liabilities | | $ | 1,446,599 |
| | $ | 1,389,222 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE NINETHREE MONTHS ENDED
ENDED SEPTEMBERJUNE 30, 20172019 AND 20162018
(Unaudited)
| | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, | | Three Months Ended June 30, |
| (in thousands) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Operating Revenues | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| Water | | $ | 239,057 |
| | $ | 237,987 |
| | $ | 88,140 |
| | $ | 76,733 |
|
| Electric | | 26,108 |
| | 26,420 |
| | 7,408 |
| | 7,841 |
|
| Total operating revenues | | 265,165 |
| | 264,407 |
| | 95,548 |
| | 84,574 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Expenses | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| Water purchased | | 50,619 |
| | 49,265 |
| | 18,762 |
| | 16,608 |
|
| Power purchased for pumping | | 6,667 |
| | 6,752 |
| | 1,982 |
| | 2,231 |
|
| Groundwater production assessment | | 14,176 |
| | 11,150 |
| | 4,640 |
| | 4,534 |
|
| Power purchased for resale | | 7,847 |
| | 7,481 |
| | 2,391 |
| | 2,384 |
|
| Supply cost balancing accounts | | (11,663 | ) | | (10,145 | ) | | 1,207 |
| | (2,029 | ) |
| Other operation | | 18,142 |
| | 18,843 |
| | 6,054 |
| | 6,419 |
|
| Administrative and general | | 48,152 |
| | 49,348 |
| | 13,678 |
| | 15,178 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 28,341 |
| | 28,117 |
| | 6,006 |
| | 9,430 |
|
| Maintenance | | 8,662 |
| | 10,426 |
| | 2,452 |
| | 3,170 |
|
| Property and other taxes | | 12,316 |
| | 11,828 |
| | 4,422 |
| | 4,004 |
|
| Gain on sale of assets | | (8,318 | ) | | — |
| | (83 | ) | | — |
|
| Total operating expenses | | 174,941 |
| | 183,065 |
| | 61,511 |
| | 61,929 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Income | | 90,224 |
| | 81,342 |
| | 34,037 |
| | 22,645 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Other Income and Expenses | | |
| | |
| | | | |
| Interest expense | | (17,170 | ) | | (16,829 | ) | | (6,001 | ) | | (5,857 | ) |
| Interest income | | 1,175 |
| | 560 |
| | 543 |
| | 457 |
|
| Other, net | | 1,454 |
| | 667 |
| | 545 |
| | 617 |
|
| Total other income and expenses, net | | (14,541 | ) | | (15,602 | ) | | (4,913 | ) | | (4,783 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income before income tax expense | | 75,683 |
| | 65,740 |
| | 29,124 |
| | 17,862 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Income tax expense | | 29,235 |
| | 25,203 |
| | 6,826 |
| | 4,214 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net Income | | $ | 46,448 |
| | $ | 40,537 |
| | $ | 22,298 |
| | $ | 13,648 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED
JUNE 30, 2019 AND 2018
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (in thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Operating Revenues | | | | |
| Water | | $ | 152,863 |
| | $ | 141,145 |
|
| Electric | | 18,037 |
| | 17,673 |
|
| Total operating revenues | | 170,900 |
| | 158,818 |
|
| | | | | |
| Operating Expenses | | | | |
| Water purchased | | 31,902 |
| | 30,215 |
|
| Power purchased for pumping | | 3,520 |
| | 3,924 |
|
| Groundwater production assessment | | 8,386 |
| | 9,185 |
|
| Power purchased for resale | | 6,095 |
| | 5,792 |
|
| Supply cost balancing accounts | | (165 | ) | | (5,898 | ) |
| Other operation | | 12,914 |
| | 12,853 |
|
| Administrative and general | | 29,772 |
| | 30,326 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 15,995 |
| | 18,764 |
|
| Maintenance | | 4,365 |
| | 6,325 |
|
| Property and other taxes | | 8,835 |
| | 8,390 |
|
| Gain on sale of assets | | (83 | ) | | — |
|
| Total operating expenses | | 121,536 |
| | 119,876 |
|
| | | | | |
| Operating Income | | 49,364 |
| | 38,942 |
|
| | | | | |
| Other Income and Expenses | | | | |
| Interest expense | | (11,999 | ) | | (11,616 | ) |
| Interest income | | 951 |
| | 837 |
|
| Other, net | | 1,950 |
| | 704 |
|
| Total other income and expenses, net | | (9,098 | ) | | (10,075 | ) |
| | | | | |
| Income before income tax expense | | 40,266 |
| | 28,867 |
|
| | | | | |
| Income tax expense | | 8,946 |
| | 6,329 |
|
| | | | | |
| Net Income | | $ | 31,320 |
| | $ | 22,538 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2019
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 |
| | | Common Shares | | Reinvested | | |
| | | Number | | | | Earnings | | |
| | | of | | | | in the | | |
| (in thousands, except number of shares) | | Shares | | Amount | | Business | | Total |
| Balances at December 31, 2018 | | 165 |
| | $ | 292,412 |
| | $ | 211,163 |
| | $ | 503,575 |
|
| Add: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net income | | | | | | 9,022 |
| | 9,022 |
|
| Stock-based compensation, net of taxes paid from shares withheld from employees related to net share settlements (Note 4) | | | | 572 |
| | | | 572 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | 60 |
| | | | 60 |
|
| Deduct: | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends on Common Shares | | | | | | 10,100 |
| | 10,100 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | | | 60 |
| | 60 |
|
| Balances at March 31, 2019 | | 165 |
| | $ | 293,044 |
| | $ | 210,025 |
| | $ | 503,069 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Add: | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | 22,298 |
| | 22,298 |
|
| Stock-based compensation, net of taxes paid from shares withheld from employees related to net share settlements (Note 4) | | | | 257 |
| | | | 257 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | 44 |
| | | | 44 |
|
| Deduct: | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Dividends on Common Shares | | | | | | 10,100 |
| | 10,100 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | | | 44 |
| | 44 |
|
| Balances at June 30, 2019 | | 165 |
| | $ | 293,345 |
| | $ | 222,179 |
| | $ | 515,524 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES
IN COMMON SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
FOR THE THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2018
(Unaudited)
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
| | | Common Shares | | Reinvested | | |
| | | Number | | | | Earnings | | |
| | | of | | | | in the | | |
| (in thousands, except number of shares) | | Shares | | Amount | | Business | | Total |
| Balances at December 31, 2017 | | 146 | | $ | 242,181 |
| | $ | 232,193 |
| | $ | 474,374 |
|
| Add: | | | | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net income | | | | | | 8,890 |
| | 8,890 |
|
| Taxes paid from shares withheld from employees related to net share settlements, net of stock-based compensation (Note 4) | | | | (266 | ) | | | | (266 | ) |
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | 49 |
| | | | 49 |
|
| Deduct: | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends on Common Shares | | | | | | 9,380 |
| | 9,380 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | | | 49 |
| | 49 |
|
| Balances at March 31, 2018 | | 146 | | 241,964 |
| | 231,654 |
| | 473,618 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Add: | | | | | | | | |
| Net income | | | | | | 13,648 |
| | 13,648 |
|
| Stock-based compensation, net of taxes paid from shares withheld from employees related to net share settlements (Note 4) | | | | 640 |
| | | | 640 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | 41 |
| | | | 41 |
|
| Deduct: | | | | | | | | |
| Dividends on Common Shares | | | | | | 9,370 |
| | 9,370 |
|
| Dividend equivalent rights on stock-based awards not paid in cash | | | | | | 41 |
| | 41 |
|
| Balance at June 30, 2018 | | 146 | | $ | 242,645 |
| | $ | 235,891 |
| | $ | 478,536 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR THE NINESIX MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBERJUNE 30, 20172019 AND 20162018
(Unaudited)
| | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, | | Six Months Ended
June 30, |
| (in thousands) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Cash Flows From Operating Activities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Net income | | $ | 46,448 |
| | $ | 40,537 |
| | $ | 31,320 |
| | $ | 22,538 |
|
| Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Depreciation and amortization | | 28,522 |
| | 28,319 |
| | 16,150 |
| | 18,885 |
|
| Provision for doubtful accounts | | 563 |
| | 431 |
| | 279 |
| | 331 |
|
| Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits | | 9,139 |
| | 10,782 |
| | (2,432 | ) | | (2,192 | ) |
| Stock-based compensation expense | | 1,970 |
| | 1,672 |
| | 1,952 |
| | 1,326 |
|
| Gain on sale of assets | | (8,318 | ) | | — |
| |
| Gain on sale of property | | | (83 | ) | | — |
|
| Gain on investments held in a trust | | | (2,187 | ) | | (97 | ) |
| Other — net | | (866 | ) | | (367 | ) | | 147 |
| | 176 |
|
| Changes in assets and liabilities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Accounts receivable — customers | | (10,683 | ) | | (4,471 | ) | | (1,129 | ) | | (835 | ) |
| Unbilled receivable | | (3,138 | ) | | (1,941 | ) | | 658 |
| | 745 |
|
| Other accounts receivable | | (1,658 | ) | | 212 |
| | 69 |
| | 2,830 |
|
| Materials and supplies | | (891 | ) | | 724 |
| | (235 | ) | | (107 | ) |
| Prepayments and other assets | | (976 | ) | | (1,143 | ) | | 2,135 |
| | (460 | ) |
| Regulatory assets | | 10,344 |
| | (13,823 | ) | | (13,932 | ) | | 12,240 |
|
| Accounts payable | | 5,999 |
| | 1,920 |
| | 3,127 |
| | (2,310 | ) |
| Inter-company receivable/payable | | (623 | ) | | (933 | ) | |
| Intercompany receivable/payable | | | — |
| | 26 |
|
| Income taxes receivable/payable from/to Parent | | 22,992 |
| | 12,863 |
| | 5,893 |
| | 7,606 |
|
| Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefits | | (2,285 | ) | | (1,529 | ) | |
| Accrued pension and other postretirement benefits | | | 3,116 |
| | 2,495 |
|
| Other liabilities | | 1,905 |
| | 2,991 |
| | (6,607 | ) | | (2,603 | ) |
| Net cash provided | | 98,444 |
| | 76,244 |
| | 38,241 |
| | 60,594 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Cash Flows From Investing Activities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Capital expenditures | | (76,373 | ) | | (98,161 | ) | | (76,660 | ) | | (53,510 | ) |
| Proceeds from sale of assets | | 34,324 |
| | — |
| | 83 |
| | — |
|
| Other investing activities | | (1,299 | ) | | (1,484 | ) | | 184 |
| | 98 |
|
| Net cash used | | (43,348 | ) | | (99,645 | ) | | (76,393 | ) | | (53,412 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Cash Flows From Financing Activities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Receipt of advances for and contributions in aid of construction | | 6,132 |
| | 2,902 |
| | 6,290 |
| | 3,343 |
|
| Refunds on advances for construction | | (3,477 | ) | | (3,449 | ) | | (4,074 | ) | | (2,616 | ) |
| Retirement or repayments of long-term debt | | (320 | ) | | (305 | ) | | (40,200 | ) | | (197 | ) |
| Net change in inter-company borrowings | | (32,000 | ) | | 42,000 |
| |
| Net change in intercompany borrowings | | | 94,000 |
| | 15,000 |
|
| Dividends paid | | (18,300 | ) | | (16,600 | ) | | (20,200 | ) | | (18,750 | ) |
| Other financing activities | | (1,086 | ) | | (1,301 | ) | | (1,310 | ) | | (1,053 | ) |
| Net cash (used) provided | | (49,051 | ) | | 23,247 |
| |
| Net cash provided (used) | | | 34,506 |
| | (4,273 | ) |
| | | | | | | | | |
| Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents | | 6,045 |
| | (154 | ) | |
| Net change in cash and cash equivalents | | | (3,646 | ) | | 2,909 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | | 209 |
| | 2,501 |
| | 4,187 |
| | 214 |
|
| Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | | $ | 6,254 |
| | $ | 2,347 |
| | $ | 541 |
| | $ | 3,123 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Non-cash transactions: | | | | | | | | |
| Accrued payables for investment in utility plant | | $ | 21,975 |
| | $ | 19,843 |
| | $ | 23,433 |
| | $ | 16,016 |
|
| Property installed by developers and conveyed | | $ | 1,796 |
| | $ | 4,853 |
| | $ | 1,241 |
| | $ | 929 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements
AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
AND
GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Nature of Operations: American States Water Company (“AWR”) is the parent company of Golden State Water Company (“GSWC”) and American States Utility Services, Inc. (“ASUS”) (and its subsidiaries, Fort Bliss Water Services Company (“FBWS”), Terrapin Utility Services, Inc. (“TUS”), Old Dominion Utility Services, Inc. (“ODUS”), Palmetto State Utility Services, Inc. (“PSUS”), Old North Utility Services, Inc. (“ONUS”), and Emerald Coast Utility Services, Inc. ("ECUS"), and Fort Riley Utility Services, Inc. ("FRUS")). The subsidiaries of ASUS are collectively referred to as the “Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries.”
GSWC is a public utility engaged principally in the purchase, production, distribution and sale of water in California serving approximately 259,000 customers.260,000 customer connections. GSWC also distributes electricity in several San Bernardino County mountain communities in California serving approximately 24,000 customers customer connections through its Bear Valley Electric Service (“BVES”) division. Although GSWC has a diversified base of residential, industrial and other customers, revenues derived from commercial and residential water customers accounted for approximately 90% of total water revenues during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. The California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) regulates GSWC’s water and electric businesses in matters including properties, rates, services, facilities and transactions by GSWC with its affiliates. AWR’sGSWC filed applications with the CPUC and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in December 2018 and July 2019, respectively, to transfer the assets and operating income are primarily thoseliabilities of GSWC.the BVES division of GSWC to Bear Valley Electric Service, Inc., a newly created separate legal entity and stand-alone subsidiary of AWR. This reorganization plan is subject to regulatory approvals and, if approved, is not expected to result in a substantive change to AWR's operations and business segments. The CPUC has scheduled to issue a final decision by the end of 2019.
ASUS, through its wholly owned subsidiaries, operates, maintains and performs construction activities (including renewal and replacement capital work) on water and/or wastewater systems at various United StatesU.S. military bases pursuant to 50-year firm fixed-price contracts. These contracts are subject to annual economic price adjustments and modifications for changes in circumstances, changes in laws and regulations and additions to the contract value for new construction of facilities at the military bases.
On September 29, 2017, ASUS was awarded a new 50-year contract by the U.S. government to operate, maintain, and provide construction management services for the water distribution and wastewater collection and treatment facilities at Fort Riley, a United States Army installation located in Kansas. The initial value of the contract is approximately $601 million over the 50-year period and is subject to annual economic price adjustments. This initial value is also subject to adjustment based on the results of a joint inventory of assets to be performed during the transition period. ASUS will assume operations at Fort Riley following the completion of a six-to-twelve-month transition period.
There is no direct regulatory oversight by the CPUC over AWR or the operations, rates or services provided by ASUS or any of its wholly owned subsidiaries.
Basis of Presentation: The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto are presented in a combined report filed by two separate Registrants: AWR and GSWC. References in this report to “Registrant” are to AWR and GSWC, collectively, unless otherwise specified.
AWR owns all of the outstanding Common Sharescommon shares of GSWC and ASUS. ASUS owns all of the outstanding Common Sharescommon stock of the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements of AWR include the accounts of AWR and its subsidiaries, all of which are wholly owned. These financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Inter-companyAmerica ("GAAP"). Intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in the AWR consolidated financial statements.
The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Registrant, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). The December 31, 20162018 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP") in the United States of America.GAAP. The preparation of the consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal, recurring items and estimates necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods have been made. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162018 filed with the SEC.
GSWC's Related Party Transactions: GSWC and ASUS provide and/or receive various support services to and from their parent, AWR, and among themselves. GSWC also allocates certain corporate office administrative and general costs to its affiliate, ASUS, using allocation factors approved by the CPUC. GSWC allocated corporate office administrative and general costs to ASUS of approximately $1.3 million and $1.0 million during each of the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, and approximately $3.0$2.4 million and $2.0 million during each of the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016. In addition, AWR has a $150.0 million syndicated credit facility.2018, respectively. AWR borrows under thisa credit facility, which expires in May 2023, and provides funds to its subsidiaries, GSWC and ASUS, in support of their operations. In March 2019, AWR amended this credit facility to increase its borrowing capacity from $150.0 million to $200.0 million. As of September
June 30, 2017,2019, there was $46.0$185.5 millionoutstanding under this facility. The interest rate charged to GSWC and ASUS is sufficient to cover AWR’s interest expense under the credit facility.
GSWC Long-Term Debt:In October 2015,March 2019, GSWC repaid $40.0 million of its 6.70% senior note, which matured in that month. GSWC increased its intercompany borrowings from AWR issued interest-bearing promissory notes (the "Notes")parent to fund the repayment of this note. GSWC intends to issue up to $115.0 million of long-term debt by the end of 2019 and ASUS for $40 millionuse the proceeds to reduce its intercompany borrowings and $10 million, respectively, which expire on May 23, 2018. Under the terms of these Notes,to partially fund capital expenditures. AWR may borrowparent intends to use any debt financing proceeds from GSWC and ASUS amounts up to $40 million and $10 million, respectively, for working capital purposes. AWR agrees to pay any unpaid principaldown the amounts outstanding under these notes, plus accrued interest. As of September 30, 2017 and 2016, there were no amounts outstanding under these notes.its credit facility.
Sales and Use Taxes: GSWC bills certain sales and use taxes levied by state or local governments to its customers. Included in these sales and use taxes are franchise fees, which GSWC pays to various municipalities (based on ordinances adopted by these municipalities) in order to use public rights of way for utility purposes. GSWC bills these franchise fees to its customers based on a CPUC-authorized rate for each ratemaking area as applicable. These franchise fees, which are required to be paid regardless of GSWC’s ability to collect them from its customers, are accounted for on a gross basis. GSWC’s franchise fees billed to customers and recorded as operating revenue were approximately $1.0 million and $1.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $2.8 million and $3.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. When GSWC acts as an agent, and a tax is not required to be remitted if it is not collected from customers, the tax is accounted for on a net basis.
Depending on the states in which their operations are conducted, the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries are also subject to certain state non-income tax assessments generally computed on a “gross receipts” or “gross revenues” basis. These non-income tax assessments are required to be paid regardless of whether the U.S. government reimburses these assessments under the 50-year contracts. The non-income tax assessments are accounted for on a gross basis and totaled $55,000 and $62,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $177,000 and $209,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in 2019
In MarchFebruary 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standard Update 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which amends a new lease accounting standard, Leases (Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. Under842), which replaces the newprior lease guidance, the tax effects related to share-based payments at settlement (or expiration) are required to be recorded through the income statement rather than through equity, therefore increasing the volatility of income tax expense. The new standard also removed the requirement to delay recognition of a windfall tax benefit until an employer reduces its current taxes payable. It also permits entities to make an accounting policy election for the impact of forfeitures on the recognition of expense for shared-based payment awards. Income tax benefits in excess of compensation costs or tax deficiencies for share-based compensation are recorded to the income tax provision, instead of to shareholders' equity, which can impact the effective tax rate. Registrant adopted the new standard effective January 1, 2017 (see Note 6). On a prospective basis, the excess tax benefits are classified as an operating activity along with other income tax cash flows on the statement of cash flows.
In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standard Update 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Under this guidance, an entity recognizes revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what the entity expects in exchange for the goods or services. The guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and adoption is not permitted earlier than 2017. The guidance allows entities to select one of two methods of adoption, either the full retrospective approach, meaning the guidance would be applied to all periods presented, or modified retrospective approach, meaning the cumulative effect of applying the guidance to prior periods would be recognized as an adjustment to opening retained earnings at January 1, 2018, and requires certain additional disclosures. Registrant intends to use the modified retrospective approach beginning January 1, 2018. Management continues to assess all potential impacts of the standard, and to-date has not identified any material impact on earnings or material impacts on how Registrant recognizes revenue. The previously disclosed issue regarding contributions in aid of construction (CIAC) has been resolved, subject to finalization of implementation guidance. GSWC does not expect CIAC to be in the scope of the guidance and, therefore, will continue to record CIAC as liabilities and as a reduction to rate base. The guidance will also require enhanced disclosures, including a disaggregated revenue disclosure from contracts with customers. Some revenue arrangements which meet the definition of alternative revenue programs under ASC 980 Regulated Operations, such as GSWC's Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism and Base Revenue Requirement Adjustment Mechanisms, are excluded from the
scope of the new standard and, therefore, will be disclosed separately from revenues from contracts with customers under the new guidance.
In February 2016, the FASB issued a new lease accounting standard, Leases (ASC 842)(ASC 840). Under the new guidance,standard, lessees will recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). For income statement purposes, leases will be classified as either operating or finance. Operating leases will result in straight-line expense while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern. Registrant adopted the new lease accounting standard as of January 1, 2019 and did not adjust comparative periods for it. There was no cumulative-effect impact to the opening balance of retained earnings as a result of this adoption. Registrant elected the practical expedient under ASU 2018-01 Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842 and did not review existing easements entered into prior to January 1, 2019. Leases with terms of twelve months or less were not recorded on the balance sheet. The standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. Management has not yet determined the effectadoption of the standardnew lease guidance did not have a material impact on Registrant's financial statements.results of operations or liquidity, but resulted in the recognition of operating lease liabilities and operating lease right-of-use assets on its balance sheets. The adoption of this guidance as of January 1, 2019 resulted in the recognition of $7.6 million in right-of-use assets and $8.0 million in operating lease liabilities (see Note 10).
In March 2017,August 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715)("ASU") 2018-15-Intangibles-Goodwill and Other-Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Improving Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. Under this ASU, entities that enter into cloud computing service arrangements are required to apply existing internal-use software guidance to determine which implementation costs are eligible for capitalization. Under that guidance, implementation costs are capitalized or expensed depending on the Presentationnature of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost, which changes the financial statement presentation for the costs of defined benefit pension plans and other retirement benefits. Under current GAAP, the components of net benefit cost for retirement plans (such as service cost, interest cost, expected return on assets, and the amortization of various deferred items),project stage during which they are aggregated as operating costs forincurred. Registrant adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2019. This accounting change did not have a significant impact on Registrant's financial statement presentation purposes. Under the new guidance, the service cost component will continuestatements.
Accounting Pronouncements to be presented as operating costs, while all other componentsAdopted in Future Periods
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of net benefit cost will be presented outsideCredit Losses on Financial Instruments, and issued further guidance in November 2018 and May 2019, related to the impairment of operating income.financial instruments, effective January 1, 2020. The new guidance also limits any capitalizationprovides an impairment model, known as the current expected credit loss model, which is based on expected credit losses rather than incurred losses over the remaining life of net periodic benefitsmost financial assets measured at amortized cost, to the service cost component. The new guidance is effective for annualincluding trade and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted.other receivables. Registrant is currently evaluating the impact of this new standard on its financial statements,guidance and to-date has not identified a material impact on its consolidated financial statements. Registrant will adopt the standard beginning in 2018.
In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230)
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which is intended to reduce diversity in practice in how certain transactions are classified in the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is permitted. Registrant does not expect the adoption of this new standard to have a significant impact on its cash flow statements.
In May 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2017-10, Service Concession Arrangements (Topic 853): Determining the Customer of the Operation Services, which addresses the accounting for a service concession arrangement. A service concession arrangement is an arrangement between a grantor and an operating entity for which the terms provide that the operating entity will operate the grantor’s infrastructure (such as water and wastewater facilities) for a specified period of time. Under this guidance, revenue from service concession arrangements will be accounted for in accordance with Topic 605 on revenue recognition, or Topic 606 on revenue from contracts with customers, as applicable. In addition, the infrastructure that is the subject of a service concession arrangement will not be recognized as property, plant, and equipment of the operating entity. For Registrant, the effective date of this new guidance will be January 1, 2018, the same date that Registrant will adopt the provisions under Topic 606. Registrant doesdo not expect the adoption of the guidance will have a material impact on its financial statements.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14-Compensation-Retirement Benefits-Defined Benefit Plans-General (Subtopic 715-20): Disclosure Framework-Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans. This ASU removes disclosures to pension plans and other post-retirement benefit plans that no longer are considered cost beneficial, clarifies the specific disclosure requirements and adds disclosure requirements deemed relevant. This ASU is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2020 and will be applied by Registrant on a retrospective basis to all periods presented. Registrant is still evaluating the ASU and has not yet determined the effect on the Company's financial statements.
Note 2 — Revenues
Most of Registrant's revenues are derived from contracts with customers, including tariff-based revenues from its regulated utilities. ASUS's 50-year firm fixed-price contracts with the U.S. government are considered service concession arrangements under ASC 853 Service Concession Arrangements. Accordingly, the services under these contracts are accounted for under Topic 606 Revenue from Contracts with Customers and the water and/or wastewater systems are not recorded as Property, Plant and Equipment on Registrant’s balance sheet.
Although GSWC has a diversified base of residential, commercial, industrial and other customers, revenues derived from residential and commercial customers generally account for approximately 90% and 85% of total water and electric revenues, respectively. The vast majority of ASUS's revenues are with the U.S. government. For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, disaggregated revenues from contracts with customers by segment were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, | | Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (dollar in thousands) | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Water: | | | | | | | |
| Tariff-based revenues | $ | 76,876 |
| | $ | 70,251 |
| | $ | 136,451 |
| | $ | 136,026 |
|
| Surcharges (cost-recovery activities) | 763 |
| | 728 |
| | 1,054 |
| | 1,521 |
|
| Other | 461 |
| | 453 |
| | 920 |
| | 895 |
|
| Water revenues from contracts with customers | 78,100 |
| | 71,432 |
| | 138,425 |
| | 138,442 |
|
| WRAM under-collection (alternative revenue program) | 10,040 |
| | 5,301 |
| | 14,438 |
| | 2,703 |
|
| Total water revenues | 88,140 |
| | 76,733 |
| | 152,863 |
| | 141,145 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Electric: | | | | | | | |
| Tariff-based revenues | 7,698 |
| | 7,795 |
| | 18,964 |
| | 17,814 |
|
| Surcharges (cost-recovery activities) | 43 |
| | 63 |
| | 97 |
| | 110 |
|
| Electric revenues from contracts with customers | 7,741 |
| | 7,858 |
| | 19,061 |
| | 17,924 |
|
| BRRAM over-collection (alternative revenue program) | (333 | ) | | (17 | ) | | (1,024 | ) | | (251 | ) |
| Total electric revenues | 7,408 |
| | 7,841 |
| | 18,037 |
| | 17,673 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Contracted services: | | | | | | | |
| Water | 14,620 |
| | 14,233 |
| | 27,975 |
| | 27,233 |
|
| Wastewater | 14,479 |
| | 8,094 |
| | 27,505 |
| | 15,578 |
|
| Contracted services revenues from contracts with customers | 29,099 |
| | 22,327 |
| | 55,480 |
| | 42,811 |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| Total revenues | $ | 124,647 |
| | $ | 106,901 |
| | $ | 226,380 |
| | $ | 201,629 |
|
The opening and closing balances of the receivable from the U.S. government, contract assets and contract liabilities from contracts with customers, which related entirely to have a significant impactASUS, were as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| (dollar in thousands) | | June 30, 2019 | | January 1, 2019 |
| | | | | |
| Receivable from the U.S. government | | $ | 59,859 |
| | $ | 61,126 |
|
| Contract assets | | $ | 31,557 |
| | $ | 24,447 |
|
| Contract liabilities | | $ | 11,564 |
| | $ | 7,530 |
|
Contract Assets - Contract assets are those of ASUS and consist of unbilled revenues recognized from work-in-progress construction projects, where the right to payment is conditional on its consolidated financial statements.something other than the passage of time. The classification of this asset as current or noncurrent is based on the timing of when ASUS expects to bill these amounts.
Contract Liabilities - Contract liabilities are those of ASUS and consist of billings in excess of revenue recognized. The classification of this liability as current or noncurrent is based on the timing of when ASUS expects to recognize revenue.
Revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, which was included in contract liabilities at the beginning of the period were $1.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively. Contracted services revenues recognized during the three months ended June 30, 2019 from performance obligations satisfied in previous periods were not material.
As of June 30, 2019, Registrant's aggregate remaining performance obligations, which are entirely for the contracted services segment, were $3.2 billion. Registrant expects to recognize revenue on these remaining performance obligations over the remaining term of each of the 50-year contracts, which range from 35 to 49 years. Each of the contracts with the U.S. government is subject to termination, in whole or in part, prior to the end of its 50-year term for convenience of the U.S. government.
Note 23 — Regulatory Matters
In accordance with accounting principles for rate-regulated enterprises, Registrant records regulatory assets, which represent probable future recovery of costs from customers through the ratemaking process, and regulatory liabilities, which represent probable future refunds that are to be credited to customers through the ratemaking process. At SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, Registrant had approximately $55.7 million of regulatory assets,liabilities, net of regulatory liabilities,assets, not accruing carrying costs. Of this amount, $26.1(i) $80.7 million of regulatory liabilities are excess deferred income taxes arising from the lower federal income tax rate due to the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("Tax Act") enacted in December 2017 that are expected to be refunded to customers, (ii) $14.2 million of regulatory liabilities are from flowed-through deferred income taxes, (iii) $35.3 million of regulatory assets relates to the underfunded position in Registrant's pension and other post-retirement obligations $3.8 million(not including the two-way pension balancing accounts), and (iv) $267,000 of regulatory assets relates to a memorandum account authorized by the CPUC to track unrealized gains and losses on BVES's purchase power contracts over the term of the contracts, and $21.2 million relates to deferred income taxes representing accelerated tax benefits flowed through to customers, which will be included in rates concurrently with recognitioncontracts. The remainder of the associated future tax expense. The remainderregulatory assets relates to other items that do not provide for or incur carrying costs.
Regulatory assets represent costs incurred by GSWC for which it has received or expects to receive rate recovery in the future. In determining the probability of costs being recognized in other periods, GSWC considers regulatory rules and decisions, past practices, and other facts or circumstances that would indicate if recovery is probable. If the CPUC determines that a portion of GSWC’s assets are not recoverable in customer rates, GSWC must determine if it has suffered an asset impairment requiringthat requires it to write down the asset's value. Regulatory assets are offset against regulatory liabilities within each ratemaking area. Amounts expected to be collected or refunded in the next 12twelve months have been classified as current assets and current liabilities by ratemaking area. Regulatory assets, less regulatory liabilities, included in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
|
| | | | | | | | |
| (dollars in thousands) | | June 30,
2019 | | December 31,
2018 |
| GSWC | | | | |
| Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism and Modified Cost Balancing Account | | $ | 30,522 |
| | $ | 17,763 |
|
| Costs deferred for future recovery on Aerojet case | | 9,166 |
| | 9,516 |
|
| Pensions and other post-retirement obligations (Note 8) | | 32,444 |
| | 33,124 |
|
| Derivative unrealized loss (Note 5) | | 267 |
| | 311 |
|
| Low income rate assistance balancing accounts | | 1,787 |
| | 2,784 |
|
| General rate case memorandum accounts | | 8,025 |
| | 5,054 |
|
| Excess deferred income taxes | | (80,690 | ) | | (81,465 | ) |
| Flow-through taxes, net | | (14,160 | ) | | (15,273 | ) |
| Other regulatory assets | | 17,700 |
| | 15,656 |
|
| Tax Cuts and Jobs Act memorandum accounts | | (8,987 | ) | | (8,293 | ) |
| Various refunds to customers | | (9,358 | ) | | (7,517 | ) |
| Total | | $ | (13,284 | ) | | $ | (28,340 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | |
| (dollars in thousands) | | September 30,
2017 | | December 31,
2016 |
| GSWC | | | | |
| Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism, net of Modified Cost Balancing Account | | $ | 40,230 |
| | $ | 47,340 |
|
| Costs deferred for future recovery on Aerojet case | | 10,983 |
| | 11,820 |
|
| Pensions and other post-retirement obligations (Note 7) | | 24,944 |
| | 28,118 |
|
| Derivative unrealized loss (Note 4) | | 3,837 |
| | 4,901 |
|
| Flow-through taxes, net (Note 6) | | 21,231 |
| | 20,134 |
|
| Low income rate assistance balancing accounts | | 6,779 |
| | 8,272 |
|
| General rate case memorandum accounts | | 12,369 |
| | 13,929 |
|
| Other regulatory assets | | 15,322 |
| | 17,633 |
|
| Various refunds to customers | | (4,789 | ) | | (5,866 | ) |
| Total | | $ | 130,906 |
| | $ | 146,281 |
|
Regulatory matters are discussed in the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162018 filed with the SEC. The discussion below focuses on significant matters and developments since December 31, 20162018.
Alternative-Revenue Programs:
GSWC records the difference between what it bills its water customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC using the Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism (“WRAM”("WRAM") and Modified Cost Balancing Account (“MCBA”) accounts approved by the CPUC. The over- or under-collection of the WRAM is aggregated with the MCBA over- or under-collection for the corresponding ratemaking area and bears interest at the current 90-day commercial paper rate.
GSWC has implemented surcharges to recover its WRAM/MCBA balancesThe change in net regulatory liabilities as of June 30, 2019 as compared to December 31, 2016. For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, surcharges (net of surcredits) of approximately $11.4 million and $6.5 million, respectively, were billed2018 is mainly due to customers to recover previously incurred under-collectionsan increase in the WRAM/MCBA accounts. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, surcharges (net of surcredits) of approximately $24.8 million and $12.9 million, respectively, were billed to customers. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, GSWC recorded additional under-collections in the WRAM/MCBA accounts of $19.5 million due to higher than adopted supply costs as well as lower than adopted customer water usage. As of September 30, 2017, GSWC had an aggregated regulatory asset of $40.2 million which is comprised of a $20.0 million under-collection balance in the WRAM and MCBA accounts andas a $20.2 million under-collectionresult of a decrease in the MCBA accounts.water customer usage.
As required by the accounting guidance for alternative revenue programs, GSWC is required to collect its WRAM balances, net of its MCBA, within 24 months following the year in which an under-collection is recorded in order to recognize such amounts as revenue. The recovery periods for the majority of GSWC's WRAM/MCBA balances are primarily within 12 to 24 months; however,months. GSWC has implemented surcharges to recover its WRAM/MCBA balances as of December 31, 2015 there2018. For the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, surcharges (net of surcredits) of approximately $832,000 and $5.6 million, respectively, were some ratemaking areas that had recovery periods relatedbilled to the 2015 WRAM balances that were greater than 24 months. As a result, during the fourth quarter of 2015, GSWC did not record $1.4 million of the 2015 WRAM under-collection balance as revenue. This amount has been recognized as revenuecustomers to recover previously incurred under-collections in the periodsWRAM/MCBA accounts. For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, surcharges (net of surcredits) of approximately $3.6 million and $9.8 million, respectively, were billed to customers to recover previously incurred under-collections in the WRAM/MCBA accounts. During the six months ended June 30, 2019, GSWC recorded additional net under-collections in the WRAM/MCBA accounts of approximately $16.4 million due to lower-than-adopted water usage, as well as higher-than-adopted supply costs currently in billed customer rates.As of June 30, 2019, GSWC had an aggregated regulatory asset of $30.5 million, which it was determinedis comprised of a $19.7 million under-collection in the amounts would be collected within 24 months. Approximately $450,000WRAM accounts and $910,000 ofa $10.8 million under-collection in the 2015 WRAM balance was recognized during the first nine months of 2017 and during the year ended December 31, 2016, respectively. MCBA accounts.
Water General Rate Case:Case Filings and Other Matters:
Water Segment:
In December 2016, the CPUC issuedJuly 2017, GSWC filed a decision in GSWC's water general rate case application for all of its water ratemaking areasregions and the general office to determine new rates for the years 2016, 2017 and 2018. The new2019 - 2021. On May 30, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on GSWC's water general rate case with rates approved were retroactive to January 1, 2016. However, because2019. Among other things, the final decision approves in its entirety a settlement agreement that had been entered into between GSWC and the CPUC’s Public Advocates Office in August 2018. As a result, the final decision authorizes GSWC to invest approximately $334.5 million in capital expenditures over the rate cycle. The $334.5 million of delaysinfrastructure investment includes $20.4 million of capital projects to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when those projects are completed.
As a result of the May 2019 CPUC decision, GSWC implemented new water rates on June 8, 2019. Due to the delay in issuingreceiving a final decision by the CPUC, ordered GSWCbilled water revenues up to bypass implementing 2016June 8, 2019 were based on 2018 adopted rates. The new rates are retroactive to January 1, 2019 and, to implement 2017 rates afteras a result, the correctioncumulative retroactive impact of minor rate calculations in the December 2016 decision, which the CPUC completed withdecision was recorded during the issuancesecond quarter of a final decision in March 2017. A net revenue shortfall of $9.92019, primarily affecting water revenues, supply costs and depreciation expense. Accordingly, GSWC added approximately $5.6 million to the general rate case memorandum accounts regulatory asset representing the rate difference between interim rates and final rates authorized by the CPUC in March 2017 that were retroactive to January 1, 2016,2019. Surcharges will be implemented to recover the retroactive rate difference over approximately 12 - 24 months. The final decision also approved the recovery of previously incurred costs that were being tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts, which resulted in a reduction to administrative and general expense of approximately $1.1 million, which was approvedalso recorded during the second quarter of 2019.
In December 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("Tax Act") was signed into federal law. The provisions of this major tax reform were generally effective January 1, 2018. The most significant provisions of the Tax Act impacting GSWC was the reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% and the elimination of bonus depreciation for recoveryregulated utilities. Pursuant to a CPUC directive, the 2018 impact of the Tax Act on the water adopted revenue requirement was tracked in a memorandum account effective January 1, 2018. On July 1, 2018, new lower water rates, which incorporated the new federal income tax rate, were implemented for all water ratemaking areas. As a result of receiving the May 2019 CPUC final decision on the water general rate case, in July 2019 GSWC filed with the CPUC to refund $7.2 million of over-collections recorded in this tax memorandum account as a one-time surcredit once approved.
Electric Segment:
In May 2017, GSWC filed its electric general rate case application with the CPUC to determine new electric rates for the years 2018 through 2021. In November 2018, GSWC and the Public Advocates Office filed a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between the two parties resolving all issues in connection with the general rate case. On July 16, 2019, the assigned Administrative Law Judge issued a proposed decision ("PD") on the general rate case. The PD approves the November 2018 settlement agreement in its entirety, which among other things, extends the rate cycle by one year (new rates will be effective for 2018-2022). Because of the delay in finalizing the electric general rate case, billed electric revenues during the first six months of 2019, and all of 2018, were based on 2017 adopted rates pending a final decision by the CPUC in August 2017. CPUC-approved surchargesthe rate case application. When approved by the CPUC, the new rates will be retroactive to January 1, 2018 and retroactive adjustments will be recorded accordingly. A final decision is expected during the third or fourth quarter of 2019.
On July 12, 2019, the Governor of California signed Assembly Bill No. 1054 (“AB 1054”), the provisions of which took effect immediately. Among other things, AB 1054 provides a framework for electrical corporations to recover this shortfall were implemented on September 1, 2017 with amortization periods ranging between 12 - 36 months for GSWC's various water ratemaking areas.
Other Regulatory Matters:
Formal Complaint Filed withcosts and expenses arising from a covered wildfire, as defined, and to allow cost recovery from ratepayers in particular circumstances. The bill also establishes a Wildfire Fund to pay eligible claims arising from a covered wildfire under certain circumstances. The Wildfire Fund is expected to be funded partially by electrical corporation shareholders, and partly by ratepayers. If the CPUC
In June 2016, a third party filed a formal complaint with the CPUC against GSWC about a water main break that occurred in 2014 causing damageCompany decides to a commercial building. Repairs to the building have been delayed for a variety of reasons, including a dispute and litigation between two of GSWC's insurance carriers regarding their respective coverage obligations, as well as questions as to the nature and extent of the building’s damage and the costs associated therewith. The complaint filed with the CPUC requests, among other things, that the CPUC investigate the main break, the damage to the commercial building and the delay of its repairs, and order GSWC to complete repairs immediately. In September 2017, the CPUC dismissed the complaint on the grounds that the CPUC lacks jurisdiction to impose monetary damages for injuries to property, as requested by the third party, and the third party lacks standing with respect to the property as it is not the owner of the damaged property.
Previously, the owners of the commercial building filed suit in Ventura County Superior Court against GSWC for damages to the building. On September 11, 2017, the Ventura County Superior Court issued a statement of decision in favor of the plaintiffs, and awarded damages to the plaintiffsparticipate in the amount of $2.6 million. In October 2017, the Court held a hearing and also awarded the plaintiffs attorneys’ fees in the amount of approximately $895,000. GSWC believesWildfire Fund, it has sufficient insurance coverageuntil September 10, 2019 to covermake the judgment and attorney fees totaling $3.5 million entered by the Court in this lawsuit. However, GSWC cannot predict the final outcome of the dispute and litigation between its insurers.initial contribution. At this time, GSWC doesa decision has not believe the final outcome will materially affect GSWC's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
been made.
Note 34 — Earnings per Share/Capital Stock
In accordance with the accounting guidance for participating securities and earnings per share (“EPS”), Registrant uses the “two-class” method of computing EPS. The “two-class” method is an earnings allocation formula that determines EPS for each class of common stock and participating security. AWR has participating securities related to restricted stock units that earn dividend equivalents on an equal basis with AWR’s Common Shares, and that have been issued under AWR's Stock Incentive Plansstock incentive plans for employees and the Non-Employee Directors Stock Plans.non-employee directors stock plans. In applying the “two-class” method, undistributed earnings are allocated to both common shares and participating securities.
The following is a reconciliation of Registrant’s net income and weighted average Common Shares outstanding used for calculating basic net income per share:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic: | | For The Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended
June 30, |
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Net income | | $ | 26,784 |
| | $ | 16,348 |
| | $ | 39,636 |
| | $ | 27,130 |
|
| Less: (a) Distributed earnings to common shareholders | | 10,119 |
| | 9,367 |
| | 20,232 |
| | 18,729 |
|
| Distributed earnings to participating securities | | 46 |
| | 51 |
| | 88 |
| | 96 |
|
| Undistributed earnings | | 16,619 |
| | 6,930 |
| | 19,316 |
| | 8,305 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| (b) Undistributed earnings allocated to common shareholders | | 16,543 |
| | 6,894 |
| | 19,232 |
| | 8,263 |
|
| Undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities | | 76 |
| | 36 |
| | 84 |
| | 42 |
|
| Total income available to common shareholders, basic (a)+(b) | | $ | 26,662 |
| | $ | 16,261 |
| | $ | 39,464 |
| | $ | 26,992 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average Common Shares outstanding, basic | | 36,804 |
| | 36,733 |
| | 36,788 |
| | 36,723 |
|
| Basic earnings per Common Share | | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.44 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 0.74 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic: | | For The Three Months Ended September 30, | | For The Nine Months Ended
September 30, |
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Net income | | $ | 21,006 |
| | $ | 21,639 |
| | 56,499 |
| | 48,531 |
|
| Less: (a) Distributed earnings to common shareholders | | 9,349 |
| | 8,189 |
| | 27,064 |
| | 24,558 |
|
| Distributed earnings to participating securities | | 50 |
| | 48 |
| | 139 |
| | 141 |
|
| Undistributed earnings | | 11,607 |
| | 13,402 |
| | 29,296 |
| | 23,832 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| (b) Undistributed earnings allocated to common shareholders | | 11,546 |
| | 13,323 |
| | 29,147 |
| | 23,696 |
|
| Undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities | | 61 |
| | 79 |
| | 149 |
| | 136 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Total income available to common shareholders, basic (a)+(b) | | $ | 20,895 |
| | $ | 21,512 |
| | $ | 56,211 |
| | $ | 48,254 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average Common Shares outstanding, basic | | 36,659 |
| | 36,561 |
| | 36,625 |
| | 36,546 |
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per Common Share | | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 1.53 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
|
Diluted EPS is based upon the weighted average number of Common Shares, including both outstanding shares and shares potentially issuable in connection with stock options and restricted stock units granted under AWR’s Stock Incentive Plansstock incentive plans for employees and the Non-Employee Directors Stock Plans,non-employee directors stock plans, and net income. At SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, there were 70,70211,556 and 138,06047,792 options outstanding, respectively, under these Plans.plans. At SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, there were also 195,457170,372 and 216,733204,909 restricted stock units outstanding, respectively, including performance shares awarded to officers of the Registrant.
The following is a reconciliation of Registrant’s net income and weighted average Common Shares outstanding for calculating diluted net income per share:
| | | Diluted: | | For The Three Months Ended September 30, | | For The Nine Months Ended
September 30, | | For The Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended
June 30, |
| (in thousands, except per share amounts) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Common shareholders earnings, basic | | $ | 20,895 |
| | $ | 21,512 |
| | $ | 56,211 |
| | $ | 48,254 |
| | $ | 26,662 |
| | $ | 16,261 |
| | $ | 39,464 |
| | $ | 26,992 |
|
| Undistributed earnings for dilutive stock-based awards | | 61 |
| | 79 |
| | 149 |
| | 136 |
| | 75 |
| | 36 |
| | 84 |
| | 42 |
|
| Total common shareholders earnings, diluted | | $ | 20,956 |
| | $ | 21,591 |
| | $ | 56,360 |
| | $ | 48,390 |
| | $ | 26,737 |
| | $ | 16,297 |
| | $ | 39,548 |
| | $ | 27,034 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Weighted average common shares outstanding, basic | | 36,659 |
| | 36,561 |
| | 36,625 |
| | 36,546 |
| | 36,804 |
| | 36,733 |
| | 36,788 |
| | 36,723 |
|
| Stock-based compensation (1) | | 197 |
| | 201 |
| | 188 |
| | 197 |
| | 159 |
| | 179 |
| | 154 |
| | 173 |
|
| Weighted average common shares outstanding, diluted | | 36,856 |
| | 36,762 |
| | 36,813 |
| | 36,743 |
| | 36,963 |
| | 36,912 |
| | 36,942 |
| | 36,896 |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Diluted earnings per Common Share | | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | 1.53 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
| | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.44 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
|
(1)In applying the treasury stock method of reflecting the dilutive effect of outstanding stock-based compensation in the calculation of diluted EPS, 70,70211,556 and 138,06047,792 stock options at SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, were deemed to be outstanding in accordance with accounting guidance on earnings per share. All of the 195,457170,372 and 216,733204,909 restricted stock units at SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, were included in the calculation of diluted EPS for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016.2018.
No stock options outstanding at SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 had an exercise price greater than the average market price of AWR’s Common Shares for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2019. There were no stock options outstanding at SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 or 20162018 that were anti-dilutive.
During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, AWR issued 107,81573,854 and 67,83252,712 common shares, for approximately $884,000$366,000 and $210,000,$340,000, respectively, under Registrant’s Common Share Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan, the 401(k) Plan, the 2000, 2008 and 2016 Stock Incentive Plans,stock incentive plans for employees, and the 2003non-employee directors stock plans.
During the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2013 Non-Employee Directors Stock Plans.
2018, AWR paid $1.6 million and $1.2 million, respectively, to taxing authorities on employees' behalf for shares withheld related to net share settlements. During the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, GSWC paid $1.3 million and $1.1 million, respectively, to taxing authorities on employees' behalf for shares withheld related to net share settlements. These payments are included in the stock-based compensation caption of the statements of equity.
During the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, AWR paid quarterly dividends of approximately $9.3$10.1 million, or $0.275 per share, and $9.4 million, or $0.255 per share, and $8.2 million, or $0.224 per share, respectively. During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, AWR paid quarterly dividends to shareholders of approximately $27.1$20.2 million, or $0.739$0.550 per share, and $24.6$18.7 million, or $0.672$0.51 per share, respectively.
During the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, GSWC paid dividends of $10.1 million and $9.4 million respectively, to AWR. During the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, GSWC paid dividends of $20.2 million and $18.8 million respectively, to AWR.
Note 45 — Derivative Instruments
Derivative financial instruments are used to manage exposure to commodity price risk. Commodity price risk represents the potential impact that can be caused by a change in the market value of a commodity.GSWC's electric division, BVES, purchases power under long-term contracts at a fixed cost depending on the amount of power and the period during which the power is purchased under such contracts. In December 2014, the CPUC approved an application that allowed BVES to immediately execute newenter into long-term purchased power contracts with energy providers.providers, which BVES executed in December 2014. BVES began taking power under these long-term contracts effective January 1, 2015 at a fixed cost over three-three and five-year terms.five year terms depending on the amount of power and period during which the power is purchased under the contracts.
The long-term contracts executed in December 2014 are subject to the accounting guidance for derivatives and require mark-to-market derivative accounting. Among other things, the CPUC also authorized GSWCBVES to establish a regulatory asset and liability memorandum account to offset the mark-to-market entries required by the accounting guidance. Accordingly, all unrealized gains and losses generated from the purchased power contracts executed in December 2014 are deferred on a monthly basis into a non-interest bearing regulatory memorandum account that tracks the changes in fair value of the derivative throughout the term of the contract. As a result, these unrealized gains and losses do not impact GSWC’s earnings. The three year contract expired on December 31, 2017, and the five year term contract expires in November 2019. Registrant has received preliminary bids for new purchase power contracts and has filed an application with the CPUC to authorize GSWC to proceed with final bidding and selection. A final decision from the CPUC, as well as the execution of new purchase power contracts, is expected by the end of 2019. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, there was a $3.8 million$267,000 unrealized loss in the memorandum account for the purchased power contracts as a result of a drop in energy prices. The notional volume of derivatives remaining under these long-term contracts as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 was approximately 245,00044,064 megawatt hours.
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements applies to all financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured and reported on a fair value basis. Under the accounting guidance, GSWC makes fair value measurements that are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; or
Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).
To value the contracts, Registrant applies the Black-76 model, utilizing various inputs that include quoted market prices for energy over the duration of the contracts. The market prices used to determine the fair value for this derivative instrument were estimated based on independent sources such as broker quotes and publications that are not observable in or corroborated by the market. Registrant received one broker quote to determine the fair value of its derivative instruments. When such inputs have a significant impact on the measurement of fair value, the instruments are categorized as Level 3. Accordingly, the valuation of the derivatives on Registrant’s purchased power contract has been classified as Level 3 for all periods presented.
The following table presents changes in the fair value of GSWC’s Level 3 derivatives for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016:2018:
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | For The Three Months Ended June 30, | | For the Six Months Ended June 30, |
| (dollars in thousands) | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Fair value at beginning of the period | | $ | (336 | ) | | $ | (2,625 | ) | | $ | (311 | ) | | $ | (2,941 | ) |
| Unrealized gain on purchased power contracts | | 69 |
| | 915 |
| | 44 |
| | 1,231 |
|
| Fair value at end of the period | | $ | (267 | ) | | $ | (1,710 | ) | | $ | (267 | ) | | $ | (1,710 | ) |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | For The Three Months Ended September 30, | | For The Nine Months Ended
September 30, |
| (dollars in thousands) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Fair value at beginning of the period | | $ | (4,493 | ) | | $ | (4,933 | ) | | $ | (4,901 | ) | | $ | (7,053 | ) |
| Unrealized gain (loss) on purchased power contracts | | 656 |
| | (648 | ) | | 1,064 |
| | 1,472 |
|
| Fair value at end of the period | | $ | (3,837 | ) | | $ | (5,581 | ) | | $ | (3,837 | ) | | $ | (5,581 | ) |
Note 56 — Fair Value of Financial Instruments
For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and short-term debt, the carrying amount is assumed to approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.
Investments held in a Rabbi Trust for the supplemental executive retirement plan ("SERP") are measured at fair value and totaled $14.8$18.5 million as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2019. All equity investments in the Rabbi Trust are Level 1 investments in mutual funds. The investments held in the Rabbi Trust are included in Other"Other Property and InvestmentsInvestments" on Registrant's balance sheets.
The table below estimates the fair value of long-term debt held by GSWC. The fair values as of SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and December 31, 20162018 were determined using rates for similar financial instruments of the same duration utilizing Level 2 methods and assumptions. The interest rates used for the SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 valuation decreased slightly as compared to December 31, 2016,2018, increasing the fair value of long-term debt as of SeptemberJune 30, 2017.2019 after taking into account the repayment of $40.0 million of GSWC's 6.70% senior note in March 2019. Changes in the assumptions will produce different results.
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | June 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| (dollars in thousands) | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
| Financial liabilities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Long-term debt—GSWC (1) | | $ | 284,778 |
| | $ | 372,745 |
| | $ | 324,978 |
| | $ | 387,889 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | September 30, 2017 | | December 31, 2016 |
| (dollars in thousands) | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value | | Carrying Amount | | Fair Value |
| Financial liabilities: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
Long-term debt—GSWC (1) | | $ | 325,275 |
| | $ | 423,841 |
| | $ | 325,582 |
| | $ | 423,124 |
|
___________________
(1) Excludes debt issuance costs and redemption premiums.
Note 67 — Income Taxes
On December 22, 2017, the Tax Act was signed into federal law. The provisions of this major tax reform were generally effective January 1, 2018. Among its significant provisions, the Tax Act reduced the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% and eliminated bonus depreciation for regulated utilities. AWR's consolidated effective income tax rate (“ETR”) was 37.3%22.6% and 37.0%21.2% for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, and was 37.3%21.9% and 37.1%20.4% for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. AWR’s ETR increased slightly during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 primarily due to the increase in GSWC's ETR. GSWC's ETR was 38.4%23.4% and 38.2%23.6% for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, and was 38.6%22.2% and 38.3%21.9% for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. GSWC'sAWR’s ETR increased because of higher state unitary taxes at AWR (parent).
The AWR and also deviatedGSWC effective tax rates differ from the federal statutory tax rate primarily due to (i) state taxes, (ii) permanent differences, including the excess tax benefits from share-based payments, which were reflected in the income statements and resulted in a reduction to income tax expense during the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, (iii) the continuing amortization of the excess deferred income tax liability that commenced upon the lowering of the federal tax rate, and (iv) differences between book and taxable income that are treated as flow-through adjustments in accordance with regulatory requirements (principally from plant, rate case,rate-case, and compensation-related items)compensation expenses).
As a regulated utility, GSWC treats certain temporary differences as flow-through adjustments in computing its income tax provisionexpense consistent with the income tax approach approved by the CPUC for ratemaking purposes.method used in its CPUC-jurisdiction ratemaking. Flow-through adjustmentsitems either increase or decrease tax expense in one period, with an offsetting decrease or increase occurring in another period. Giving effect to these temporary differences as flow-through adjustments typically results in a greater variance betweenand thus impact the ETR and the statutory federal income tax rate in any given period than would otherwise exist if GSWC were not required to account for its income taxes as a regulated enterprise.
Change in Accounting Guidance:
Effective January 1, 2017, Registrant adopted the new accounting standard addressing share-based payments (see Note 1). Under the new guidance, the tax effects related to share-based payments are required to be recorded through the income statement. Previously, tax benefits in excess of compensation cost ("windfalls") were recorded directly to equity and tax deficiencies ("shortfalls") were recorded to equity to the extent of any pool of windfall tax benefits from prior awards, with the remainder recognized in income tax expense. AWR and GSWC adopted the guidance effective January 1, 2017 and, therefore, all excess tax benefits resulting from share-based payments during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 were reflected in the income statements. For the three months ended September 30, 2017, this change reduced income tax expense by approximately $279,000 and $288,000 for AWR and GSWC, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the reduction to income tax expense was approximately $1,019,000 and $989,000 for AWR and GSWC, respectively.
ETR.
Note 78 — Employee Benefit Plans
The components of net periodic benefit costs before allocation to the overhead pool, for Registrant’s pension plan, postretirement plan and SERP for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016 are2018 were as follows: | | | | | For The Three Months Ended September 30, | | For The Three Months Ended June 30, |
| | | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits | | SERP | | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits | | SERP |
| (dollars in thousands) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Components of Net Periodic Benefits Cost: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Service cost | | $ | 1,250 |
| | $ | 1,274 |
| | $ | 53 |
| | $ | 68 |
| | $ | 232 |
| | $ | 200 |
| | $ | 986 |
| | $ | 1,269 |
| | $ | 53 |
| | $ | 57 |
| | $ | 298 |
| | $ | 274 |
|
| Interest cost | | 1,976 |
| | 1,978 |
| | 73 |
| | 97 |
| | 223 |
| | 186 |
| | 2,133 |
| | 1,903 |
| | 80 |
| | 72 |
| | 267 |
| | 222 |
|
| Expected return on plan assets | | (2,428 | ) | | (2,457 | ) | | (107 | ) | | (122 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (2,595 | ) | | (2,795 | ) | | (112 | ) | | (123 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Amortization of prior service cost (benefit) | | — |
| | 12 |
| | — |
| | (9 | ) | | 3 |
| | 6 |
| |
| Amortization of prior service cost | | | 109 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss | | 231 |
| | 228 |
| | (242 | ) | | (150 | ) | | 194 |
| | 73 |
| | 351 |
| | 283 |
| | (150 | ) | | (182 | ) | | 118 |
| | 262 |
|
| Net periodic pension cost under accounting standards | | 1,029 |
| | 1,035 |
| | (223 | ) | | (116 | ) | | 652 |
| | 465 |
| |
| Regulatory adjustment — deferred | | 266 |
| | 221 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Net periodic benefits costs under accounting standards | | | 984 |
| | 660 |
| | (129 | ) | | (176 | ) | | 683 |
| | 758 |
|
| Regulatory adjustment - deferred | | | (342 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total expense recognized, before surcharges and allocation to overhead pool | | $ | 1,295 |
| | $ | 1,256 |
| | $ | (223 | ) | | $ | (116 | ) | | $ | 652 |
| | $ | 465 |
| | $ | 642 |
| | $ | 660 |
| | $ | (129 | ) | | $ | (176 | ) | | $ | 683 |
| | $ | 758 |
|
| | | | | For The Nine Months Ended September 30, | | For The Six Months Ended June 30, |
| | | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits | | SERP | | Pension Benefits | | Other Postretirement Benefits | | SERP |
| (dollars in thousands) | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2017 | | 2016 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Components of Net Periodic Benefits Cost: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Service cost | | $ | 3,750 |
| | $ | 3,822 |
| | $ | 171 |
| | $ | 204 |
| | $ | 696 |
| | $ | 600 |
| | $ | 2,220 |
| | $ | 2,670 |
| | $ | 106 |
| | $ | 114 |
| | $ | 596 |
| | $ | 548 |
|
| Interest cost | | 5,928 |
| | 5,934 |
| | 243 |
| | 291 |
| | 669 |
| | 558 |
| | 4,264 |
| | 3,824 |
| | 160 |
| | 144 |
| | 534 |
| | 444 |
|
| Expected return on plan assets | | (7,278 | ) | | (7,377 | ) | | (351 | ) | | (366 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | (5,188 | ) | | (5,586 | ) | | (224 | ) | | (246 | ) | | — |
| | — |
|
| Amortization of prior service cost (benefit) | | — |
| | 36 |
| | — |
| | (27 | ) | | 9 |
| | 18 |
| |
| Amortization of prior service cost | | | 218 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Amortization of actuarial (gain) loss | | 693 |
| | 684 |
| | (582 | ) | | (450 | ) | | 582 |
| | 219 |
| | 710 |
| | 628 |
| | (300 | ) | | (364 | ) | | 236 |
| | 524 |
|
| Net periodic pension cost under accounting standards | | 3,093 |
| | 3,099 |
| | (519 | ) | | (348 | ) | | 1,956 |
| | 1,395 |
| |
| Regulatory adjustment — deferred | | 791 |
| | 644 |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| |
| Net periodic benefits costs under accounting standards | | | 2,224 |
| | 1,536 |
| | (258 | ) | | (352 | ) | | 1,366 |
| | 1,516 |
|
| Regulatory adjustment - deferred | | | (342 | ) | | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total expense recognized, before surcharges and allocation to overhead pool | | $ | 3,884 |
| | $ | 3,743 |
| | $ | (519 | ) | | $ | (348 | ) | | $ | 1,956 |
| | $ | 1,395 |
| | $ | 1,882 |
| | $ | 1,536 |
| | $ | (258 | ) | | $ | (352 | ) | | $ | 1,366 |
| | $ | 1,516 |
|
Registrant contributed $6.5expects to contribute, at least, approximately $3.9 million to its pension plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.
Regulatory Adjustment:2019.
As authorized by the CPUC in the most recent water and electric general rate case decisions, GSWC utilizes two-way balancing accounts for its water and electric regions and the general office to track differences between the forecasted annual pension expenses in rates, or expected to be in rates, and the actual annual expense recorded by GSWC in accordance with the accounting guidance for pension costs. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, GSWC had a total of $1.1$2.9 million over-collection in the two-way pension balancing accounts included as part of the pension regulatory asset (Note 2)3).
Note 89 — Contingencies and Gain on Sale of Assets
Condemnation of Properties:
The laws of the State of California provide for the acquisition of public utility property by governmental agencies through their power of eminent domain, also known as condemnation, where doing so is necessary and in the public interest. In addition, these laws provide that the owner of utility property (i) may contest whether the condemnation is necessary and in the public interest, and (ii) is entitled to receive the fair market value of its property if the property is ultimately taken.
Claremont System:
In December 2014, the City of Claremont, California (“Claremont”) filed an eminent-domain action against GSWC to condemn GSWC's Claremont water system. In December 2016, the County of Los Angeles Superior Court (the “Court”) issued a decision rejecting Claremont’s attempt to take over GSWC’s Claremont water system. In February 2017, the Court further ordered that GSWC was entitled to recover $7.6 million (“Judgment Amount”) of its litigation expenses and related defense costs from Claremont. During the first quarter of 2017, Claremont appealed both decisions.
In October 2017, GSWC and Claremont entered into a settlement agreement whereby Claremont agreed to drop its appeals and to pay $2.0 million on or before December 31, 2017 to GSWC as partial satisfaction of the Judgment Amount plus interest accrued through the end of 2017. Upon receipt of the $2.0 million, which is expected during the fourth quarter of 2017 pursuant to the settlement agreement, GSWC will reflect this $2.0 million payment as a reduction to operating expenses. Furthermore, quarterly interest-only payments calculated on the unpaid Judgment Amount of $5.9 million are to be made by Claremont to GSWC over the next 12 years. If Claremont (i) makes its initial payment of $2.0 million and all of the quarterly payments as required, and (ii) does not take formal action to condemn GSWC's Claremont water system before December 31, 2029, GSWC will waive payment of the unpaid Judgment Amount. However, if Claremont were to take formal action within the next 12 years or miss any of the required payments specified in the settlement agreement, the unpaid Judgment Amount and any unpaid accrued interest would immediately become due and payable. At this time, GSWC is unable to predict the actions that Claremont will take over the next 12 years. GSWC serves approximately 11,000 customers in Claremont.
Ojai Water System and Gain on Sale of Assets:
On April 12, 2017, the Board of Directors of Casitas Municipal Water District (“Casitas”) approved a settlement agreement with GSWC, and a group of citizens referred to as Ojai Friends of Locally Owned Water (“Ojai FLOW”), to resolve the eminent domain action and other litigation brought by Casitas and Ojai FLOW against GSWC. In accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement, on June 8, 2017 Casitas acquired the operating assets of GSWC’s 2,900-connection Ojai water system by eminent domain for $34.3 million in cash, including payments for customer receivables and regulatory assets, and Casitas and Ojai FLOW dismissed all claims against GSWC. As a result of this transaction, GSWC recorded a pretax gain of $8.3 million on the sale of the Ojai water system during the second quarter of 2017. The proceeds received from this transaction were used to repay a portion of GSWC’s short-term borrowings. On June 8, 2017, the closing date of the transaction, the assets and liabilities related to the Ojai water system acquired and assumed by Casitas were as follows:
|
| | | | |
| Assets and Liabilities Sold: | | |
| (dollars in thousands) | | As of June 8, 2017 |
| | | |
| Net utility plant, including construction work in progress | | $ | 22,256 |
|
| Accounts receivable | | 721 |
|
| Regulatory assets | | 3,944 |
|
| Assets sold | | $ | 26,921 |
|
| | | |
| Advances for construction | | $ | (366 | ) |
| Contributions in aid of construction — net | | (532 | ) |
| Liabilities directly associated with assets sold | | $ | (898 | ) |
Environmental Clean-Up and Remediation:
GSWC has been involved in environmental remediation and cleanup at a plant site ("Chadron Plant") that contained an underground storage tank which was used to store gasoline for its vehicles. This tank was removed from the ground in July 1990 along with the dispenser and ancillary piping. Since then, GSWC has been involved in various remediation activities at this site. Analysis indicates that off-site monitoring wells may be necessary to document effectiveness of remediation.
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, the total amount spent to clean-upclean up and remediate GSWC’s plant facility was approximately $5.2$6.2 million, of which $1.5 million has been paid by the State of California Underground Storage Tank Fund. Amounts paid by
GSWC have been included in rate base and approved by the CPUC for recovery. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, GSWC has a regulatory asset and an accrued liability for the estimated additional cost of $1.4$1.3 million to complete the cleanup at the site. The estimate includes costs for two years of continued activities of groundwater cleanup and monitoring, future soil treatment and site-closure-related activities. The ultimate cost may vary as there are many unknowns in remediation of underground gasoline spills and this is an estimate based on currently available information. Management also believes it is probable that the estimated additional costs will continue to be approved in rate base by the CPUC.
Other Litigation:
Registrant is also subject to other ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business, some of which may include claims for compensatory and punitive damages. Management believes that rate recovery, proper insurance coverage and reserves are in place to insure against, among other things, property, general liability, employment, and workers’ compensation claims incurred in the ordinary course of business. Insurance coverage may not cover certain claims involving punitive damages. However, Registrant does not believe the outcome from any pending suits or administrative proceedings will have a material effect on Registrant's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Note 10 — Leases
The adoption of the new lease guidance (see Note 1) effective January 1, 2019 did not have a material impact on Registrant's results of operations or liquidity, but resulted in the recognition of operating lease liabilities and operating lease right-of-use assets on its balance sheets. Right-of-use ("ROU") assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the estimated present value of lease payments over the lease term. As of June 30, 2019, Registrant has right-of-use assets of $11.1 million, short-term operating lease liabilities of $1.8 million and long-term operating lease liabilities of $9.5 million.
Significant assumptions and judgments made as part of the adoption of this new lease standard include determining (i) whether a contract contains a lease, (ii) whether a contract involves an identified asset, and (iii) which party to the contract directs the use of the asset. The discount rates used to calculate the present value of lease payments were determined based on hypothetical borrowing rates available to Registrant over terms similar to the lease terms.
Registrant’s leases consist of real estate and equipment leases. Most of these are GSWC's leases. Most of Registrant's leases require fixed lease payments. Some real estate leases have escalation payments which depend on an index. Variable lease costs have not been material. Lease terms used to measure the lease liability include options to extend the lease if the option is reasonably certain to be exercised. Lease and non-lease components were combined to measure lease liabilities. Registrant also has a real estate lease that have not yet commenced as of June 30, 2019. This lease will create additional operating right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities of approximately $2.2 million upon possession of the office space later in 2019.
GSWC's long-term debt includes $28.0 million of 9.56% private placement notes, which require GSWC to maintain a total indebtedness to capitalization ratio of less than 0.6667-to-1. The indebtedness, as defined in the note agreement, includes any lease liabilities required to be recorded under GAAP. As of June 30, 2019, GSWC had a total indebtedness (including GSWC's lease liabilities) to capitalization ratio of 0.46-to-1. None of the other covenants or restrictions contained in Registrant's long-term debt agreements were affected by the adoption of the new lease standard.
Registrant's supplemental lease information for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 is as follows (in thousands, except for weighted average data):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 |
| | | | |
| Operating lease costs | $ | 761 |
| | $ | 1,559 |
|
| Short-term lease costs | $ | 106 |
| | $ | 180 |
|
| | | | |
| Weighted average remaining lease term (in years) | 7.81 |
| | 7.81 |
|
| Weighted-average discount rate | 3.4 | % | | 3.4 | % |
| | | | |
| Non-cash transactions | | | |
| Lease liabilities arising from obtaining right-of-use assets | $ | 6,730 |
| | $ | 14,698 |
|
During the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, Registrant’s consolidated rent expense was approximately $630,000 and $567,000, respectively, and was approximately $1.3 million and $1.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Registrant has entered into several new office leases during 2019. Registrant’s future minimum payments under long-term non-cancelable operating leases are as follows (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | |
| | June 30, 2019 | | December 31, 2018 |
| 2019 (July through December 2019 as of June 30, 2019) | $ | 1,370 |
| | $ | 2,818 |
|
| 2020 | 2,293 |
| | 2,530 |
|
| 2021 | 2,122 |
| | 1,497 |
|
| 2022 | 1,795 |
| | 1,007 |
|
| 2023 | 1,337 |
| | 546 |
|
| Thereafter | 4,615 |
| | 605 |
|
| Total lease payments | 13,532 |
| | $ | 9,003 |
|
| Less: imputed interest | 2,176 |
| | |
| Total lease obligations | 11,356 |
| | |
| Less: current obligations | 1,808 |
| | |
| Long-term lease obligations | $ | 9,548 |
| | |
There is no material difference between the consolidated operations of AWR and the operations of GSWC in regard to the future minimum payments under long-term non-cancelable operating leases.
Note 911 — Business Segments
AWR has three reportable segments, water, electric and contracted services, whereas GSWC has two segments, water and electric. On a stand-alone basis, AWR has no material assets other than its equity investments in its subsidiaries.
subsidiaries and note receivables therefrom, and deferred taxes.
All activities of GSWC, a rate-regulated utility, are geographically located within California. Activities of ASUS and its subsidiaries are conducted in California, Georgia, Florida, Kansas, Maryland, New Mexico, North Carolina, South Carolina, Texas and Virginia. In September 2017, ASUS was awarded a new 50-year contract by the U.S. government for water and wastewater operations at Fort Riley located in Kansas. ASUS will assume operations at Fort Riley following the completion of a six-to-twelve-month transition period. Each of ASUS’s wholly owned subsidiaries is regulated, if applicable, by the state in which the subsidiary primarily conducts water and/or wastewater operations. Fees charged for operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement services are based upon the terms of the contracts with the U.S. government, which have been filed, as appropriate, with the commissions in the states in which ASUS’s subsidiaries are incorporated.
The tables below set forth information relating to GSWC’s operating segments, ASUS and its subsidiaries and other matters. Total assets by segment are not presented below, as certain of Registrant’s assets are not tracked by segment. The utility plant amounts are net of respective accumulated provisions for depreciation. Capital additions reflect capital expenditures paid in cash, and exclude U.S. government- and third-party contractor-funded capital expenditures for ASUS and property installed by developers and conveyed to GSWC. |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As Of And For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2019 |
| | | GSWC | | | | AWR | | Consolidated |
| (dollars in thousands) | | Water | | Electric | | ASUS | | Parent | | AWR |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 88,140 |
| | $ | 7,408 |
| | $ | 29,099 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 124,647 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | | 33,259 |
| | 778 |
| | 5,395 |
| | (2 | ) | | 39,430 |
|
| Interest expense, net | | 5,112 |
| | 346 |
| | (219 | ) | | 167 |
| | 5,406 |
|
| Utility plant | | 1,273,962 |
| | 63,462 |
| | 18,239 |
| | — |
| | 1,355,663 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense (1) | | 5,405 |
| | 601 |
| | 649 |
| | — |
| | 6,655 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | 6,812 |
| | 14 |
| | 1,300 |
| | (295 | ) | | 7,831 |
|
| Capital additions | | 36,293 |
| | 1,254 |
| | 3,046 |
| | — |
| | 40,593 |
|
| | | | | As Of And For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2017 | | As Of And For The Three Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
| | | GSWC | | | | AWR | | Consolidated | | GSWC | | | | AWR | | Consolidated |
| (dollars in thousands) | | Water | | Electric | | ASUS | | Parent | | AWR | | Water | | Electric | | ASUS | | Parent | | AWR |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 91,919 |
| | $ | 7,994 |
| | $ | 24,505 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 124,418 |
| | $ | 76,733 |
| | $ | 7,841 |
| | $ | 22,327 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 106,901 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | | 31,473 |
| | 1,595 |
| | 5,502 |
| | (3 | ) | | 38,567 |
| | 21,244 |
| | 1,401 |
| | 2,925 |
| | (2 | ) | | 25,568 |
|
| Interest expense, net | | 4,974 |
| | 346 |
| | 58 |
| | 76 |
| | 5,454 |
| | 5,047 |
| | 353 |
| | (71 | ) | | 83 |
| | 5,412 |
|
| Utility plant | | 1,117,674 |
| | 57,669 |
| | 6,273 |
| | — |
| | 1,181,616 |
| | 1,166,867 |
| | 60,504 |
| | 11,418 |
| | — |
| | 1,238,789 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense (1) | | 8,972 |
| | 537 |
| | 345 |
| | — |
| | 9,854 |
| | 8,866 |
| | 564 |
| | 580 |
| | — |
| | 10,010 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | 10,544 |
| | 269 |
| | 1,944 |
| | (249 | ) | | 12,508 |
| | 3,909 |
| | 305 |
| | 705 |
| | (532 | ) | | 4,387 |
|
| Capital additions | | 30,536 |
| | 559 |
| | 905 |
| | — |
| | 32,000 |
| | 24,768 |
| | 1,150 |
| | 2,500 |
| | — |
| | 28,418 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As Of And For The Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 |
| | | GSWC | | | | AWR | | Consolidated |
| (dollars in thousands) | | Water | | Electric | | ASUS | | Parent | | AWR |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 152,863 |
| | $ | 18,037 |
| | $ | 55,480 |
| |
|
| | $ | 226,380 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | | 46,525 |
| | 2,839 |
| | 10,265 |
| | (4 | ) | | 59,625 |
|
| Interest expense, net | | 10,349 |
| | 699 |
| | (580 | ) | | 313 |
| | 10,781 |
|
| Utility plant | | 1,273,962 |
| | 63,462 |
| | 18,239 |
| | — |
| | 1,355,663 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense (1) | | 14,794 |
| | 1,201 |
| | 1,492 |
| | — |
| | 17,487 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | 8,485 |
| | 461 |
| | 2,425 |
| | (230 | ) | | 11,141 |
|
| Capital additions | | 74,672 |
| | 1,988 |
| | 4,495 |
| | — |
| | 81,155 |
|
| | | | | As Of And For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2016 | | As Of And For The Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 |
| | | GSWC | | | | AWR | | Consolidated | | GSWC | | | | AWR | | Consolidated |
| (dollars in thousands) | | Water | | Electric | | ASUS | | Parent | | AWR | | Water | | Electric | | ASUS | | Parent | | AWR |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 90,617 |
| | $ | 8,146 |
| | $ | 25,043 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 123,806 |
| | $ | 141,145 |
| | $ | 17,673 |
| | $ | 42,811 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 201,629 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | | 32,642 |
| | 1,500 |
| | 5,487 |
| | (12 | ) | | 39,617 |
| | 35,302 |
| | 3,640 |
| | 5,322 |
| | (5 | ) | | 44,259 |
|
| Interest expense, net | | 5,145 |
| | 328 |
| | 12 |
| | 39 |
| | 5,524 |
| | 10,056 |
| | 723 |
| | (137 | ) | | 157 |
| | 10,799 |
|
| Utility plant | | 1,068,048 |
| | 54,880 |
| | 5,660 |
| | — |
| | 1,128,588 |
| | 1,166,867 |
| | 60,504 |
| | 11,418 |
| | — |
| | 1,238,789 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense (1) | | 8,734 |
| | 506 |
| | 246 |
| | — |
| | 9,486 |
| | 17,635 |
| | 1,129 |
| | 912 |
| | — |
| | 19,676 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | 10,575 |
| | 466 |
| | 1,951 |
| | (284 | ) | | 12,708 |
| | 5,558 |
| | 771 |
| | 1,259 |
| | (637 | ) | | 6,951 |
|
| Capital additions | | 32,655 |
| | 1,290 |
| | 628 |
| | — |
| | 34,573 |
| | 51,386 |
| | 2,124 |
| | 5,272 |
| | — |
| | 58,782 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As Of And For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 |
| | | GSWC | | | | AWR | | Consolidated |
| (dollars in thousands) | | Water | | Electric | | ASUS | | Parent | | AWR |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 239,057 |
| | $ | 26,108 |
| | $ | 71,258 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 336,423 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | | 84,289 |
| | 5,935 |
| | 14,907 |
| | (10 | ) | | 105,121 |
|
| Interest expense, net | | 14,924 |
| | 1,071 |
| | 214 |
| | 197 |
| | 16,406 |
|
| Utility plant | | 1,117,674 |
| | 57,669 |
| | 6,273 |
| | — |
| | 1,181,616 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense (1) | | 26,731 |
| | 1,610 |
| | 843 |
| | — |
| | 29,184 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | 27,739 |
| | 1,496 |
| | 5,152 |
| | (717 | ) | | 33,670 |
|
| Capital additions | | 74,113 |
| | 2,260 |
| | 1,523 |
| | — |
| | 77,896 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| | | As Of And For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016 |
| | | GSWC | | | | AWR | | Consolidated |
| (dollars in thousands) | | Water | | Electric | | ASUS | | Parent | | AWR |
| Operating revenues | | $ | 237,987 |
| | $ | 26,420 |
| | $ | 64,880 |
| | $ | — |
| | $ | 329,287 |
|
| Operating income (loss) | | 76,502 |
| | 4,840 |
| | 11,298 |
| | (16 | ) | | 92,624 |
|
| Interest expense, net | | 15,272 |
| | 997 |
| | 29 |
| | 90 |
| | 16,388 |
|
| Utility plant | | 1,068,048 |
| | 54,880 |
| | 5,660 |
| | — |
| | 1,128,588 |
|
| Depreciation and amortization expense (1) | | 26,597 |
| | 1,520 |
| | 761 |
| | — |
| | 28,878 |
|
| Income tax expense (benefit) | | 23,528 |
| | 1,675 |
| | 4,029 |
| | (655 | ) | | 28,577 |
|
| Capital additions | | 93,189 |
| | 4,972 |
| | 1,746 |
| | — |
| | 99,907 |
|
(1)Depreciation computed on GSWC’s transportation equipment is recorded in other operating expenses and totaled $61,000 $96,000
and $68,000$61,000 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively, and $181,000$154,000 and $202,000$121,000 for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.
The following table reconciles total utility plant (a key figure for ratemaking) to total consolidated assets (in thousands):
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | June 30, |
| | | 2019 | | 2018 |
| Total utility plant | | $ | 1,355,663 |
| | $ | 1,238,789 |
|
| Other assets | | 211,620 |
| | 202,333 |
|
| Total consolidated assets | | $ | 1,567,283 |
| | $ | 1,441,122 |
|
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | September 30, |
| | | 2017 | | 2016 |
| Total utility plant | | $ | 1,181,616 |
| | $ | 1,128,588 |
|
| Other assets | | 304,870 |
| | 311,798 |
|
| Total consolidated assets | | $ | 1,486,486 |
| | $ | 1,440,386 |
|
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
General
The following discussion and analysis provides information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets, and where necessary, includes specific references to AWR’s individual segments and/or its subsidiaries: GSWCsubsidiaries (GSWC and ASUS and its subsidiaries. subsidiaries), and AWR (parent) where applicable.
Included in the following analysis is a discussion of water and electric gross margins. Water and electric gross margins are computed by subtracting total supply costs from total revenues. Registrant uses these gross margins as important measures in evaluating its operating results. Registrant believes these measures are useful internal benchmarks in evaluating the performance of GSWC.
The discussions and tables included in the following analysis also present Registrant’s operations in terms of earnings per share by business segment. segment, which equals each business segment’s earnings divided by the company’s weighted average number of diluted shares. Furthermore, the retroactive impact related to the first quarter of 2019 resulting from the CPUC's final decision on the water general rate case issued in May 2019 has been excluded when communicating the water segment’s second quarter results to help facilitate comparisons of the company’s performance from period to period.
Registrant believes that the disclosure of earnings per share by business segment providesand the adjustment to the water segment's earnings for the second quarter of 2019 that related to the first quarter of 2019 provide investors with clarity surrounding the performance of its different services. Registrant reviews these measurements regularly and compares them to historical periods and to its operating budget. TheseHowever, these measures, which are not presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"), may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other entities and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income or earnings per share, which are determined in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of water and electric gross margins to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is included in the table under the section titled “Operating Expenses: Supply Costs.” Reconciliations A reconciliation to AWR’s diluted earnings per share areis included in the discussionsdiscussion under the sections titled “Summary of ThirdSecond Quarter Results by Segment” and “Summary of Year-to-Date Results by Segment.”
Overview
Factors affecting our financial performance are summarized under Forward-Looking Information.and under “Risk Factors” in our Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2018.
Water and Electric Segments:
GSWC's revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned primarily through delivering potable water to homes and businesses in California and the delivery of electricity in the Big Bear area of San Bernardino County, California. Rates charged to GSWC customers are determined by the CPUC. These rates are intended to allow recovery of operating costs and a reasonable rate of return on capital. GSWC plans to continue to seek additional rate increases in future years from the CPUC to recover operating and supply costs and receive reasonable returns on invested capital. Capital expenditures in future years at GSWC are expected to remain at higher levels than depreciation expense. When necessary, GSWC obtains funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank borrowings.
General Rate Case and Changes in Rates for 2016 and 2017Filings:
Water Segment:
In December 2016,July 2017, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all of its water regions and the general office to determine new rates for the years 2019 - 2021. On May 30, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision inon GSWC's water general rate case with rates retroactive to January 1, 2019. Among other things, the final decision approves in its entirety an August 2018 settlement agreement that had been entered into between GSWC and the CPUC’s Public Advocates Office. As a result, the final decision authorizes GSWC to invest approximately $334.5 million over the rate cycle. The $334.5 million of infrastructure investment includes $20.4 million of capital projects to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when those projects are completed.
Excluding the advice letter project revenues, the new rates approved will increase the water gross margin for 2019 by approximately $7.1 million, adjusted for updated inflation index values since the August 2018 settlement, as compared to the 2018 adopted water gross margin. The 2019 water revenue requirement has been reduced to reflect a decrease of approximately $7.0 million in depreciation expense, compared to the adopted 2018 depreciation expense, due to a reduction in the overall composite depreciation rates based on a revised study filed in the general rate case. The decrease in depreciation expense lowers the water gross margin, and is offset by a corresponding decrease in depreciation expense, resulting in no impact to net earnings. In addition, the 2019 water revenue requirement includes a decrease of approximately $2.2 million for excess deferred tax refunds as a result of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which setshas a corresponding decrease in income tax expense and also results in no
impact to net earnings. Had depreciation remained the same as the 2018 adopted amount and there were no excess deferred tax refunds that lowered the 2019 revenue requirement, the water gross margin for 2019 would have increased by approximately $16.3 million.
As result of the May 2019 CPUC final decision, GSWC implemented new water rates on June 8, 2019. Due to the delay in receiving a final decision by the CPUC, billed water revenues up to June 8, 2019 were based on 2018 adopted rates. Because the new rates are retroactive to January 1, 2019, the cumulative retroactive impact of the CPUC decision was recorded during the second quarter of 2019, including approximately $0.08 per share related to the first quarter of 2019. The final decision also approved the recovery of previously incurred costs that were being tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts, which resulted in a reduction to administrative and general expense of approximately $1.1 million, or $0.02 per share, which was also recorded during the second quarter of 2019. The final decision also allows for potential additional water revenue increases in 2020 and 2021 of approximately $9.6 million and $12.0 million, respectively, subject to the results of an earnings test and changes to the forecasted inflationary index values.
Electric Segment:
In May 2017, GSWC filed its electric general rate case application with the CPUC to determine new electric rates for the years 2016 - 2018.2018 through 2021. In November 2018, GSWC and the Public Advocates Office filed a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between the two parties resolving all issues in connection with the general rate case.
On July 16, 2019, the assigned Administrative Law Judge issued a proposed decision on the electric general rate case. The 2016 ratesproposed decision approves the settlement agreement in its entirety. Among other things, the settlement incorporates a previous stipulation in the case, which authorizes a new return on equity for GSWC's electric segment of 9.60%, as compared to its previously authorized return of 9.95%. The stipulation also included a capital structure and debt cost that is consistent with those approved by the CPUC in March 2018 in connection with GSWC's water segment cost of capital proceeding. Furthermore, the decision were retroactivesettlement (i) extends the rate cycle by one year (new rates will be effective for 2018-2022); (ii) increases the electric gross margin for 2018 by approximately $2.0 million compared to January 1, 2016. the 2017 adopted electric gross margin, adjusted for tax reform; (iii) authorizes BVES to construct all the capital projects requested in its application and provides additional funding for the fifth year added to the rate cycle, which total approximately $44 million of capital projects over the 5-year rate cycle; and (iv) increases the adopted electric gross margin by $1.2 million for each of the years 2019 and 2020, by $1.1 million in 2021, and by $1.0 million in 2022 (the rate increases for 2019 – 2022 are not subject to an earnings test).
Because of the delay in issuing a decision,finalizing the CPUC ordered GSWC to bypass implementing 2016electric general rate case, billed electric revenues during 2018 and the first six months of 2019 were based on 2017 adopted rates, and to implement 2017 rates after the correction of minor rate calculations in the December 2016 decision. The CPUC issuedpending a final decision by the CPUC in March 2017 withthis rate case application. Had the corrected rate calculations. The revenue shortfall due to differences between the actualnew rates charged in 2016 and early 2017 while the decision was still pending, and the rates adopted in the final decision are being recovered through a rate surcharge. Thesettlement agreement been in place as of January 1, 2018, pretax income for the electric segment would have increased by approximately $2.0 million, or $0.04 per share, for the full year ended December 31, 2018, and by approximately $1.7 million, or approximately $0.03 per share, for the first six months of 2019. When approved, the new 2017 rates which are effective andwill be retroactive to January 1, 2017, were implemented in April 2017. The new rates2018 and adopted supply costs are expected to increaseretroactive adjustments for 2019 will be recorded accordingly, as well as the adopted water gross margin in 2017 by approximately $3.3$2.0 million, as compared to 2016, excluding the increaseor $0.04 per share, related to GSWC's Ojai water system, which was sold in June 2017 (see discussion below).
The water gross margin recorded through September 30, 2016 reflected GSWC's position in the then pending water general rate case, which assumed the CPUC would adopt GSWC’s litigated positions in its entirety related to capital expenditure requests and executive compensation. The2018. A final decision authorized 87% of GSWC’s capital requests in customer rates, and allowed only a portion of its executive incentive program. Whenis expected during the initial decision was issued in December 2016 with new rates retroactive to January 1, 2016, GSWC recorded a cumulative downward adjustment of $5.2 million to the water gross margin in thethird or fourth quarter of 2016 related2019.
California Assembly Bill No. 1054
On July 12, 2019, the Governor of California signed Assembly Bill No. 1054 (“AB 1054”), the provisions of which took effect immediately. Among other things, AB 1054 provides a framework for electrical corporations to recover costs and expenses arising from a covered wildfire, as defined, and to allow cost recovery from ratepayers in particular circumstances. The bill also establishes a Wildfire Fund to pay eligible claims arising from a covered wildfire under certain circumstances. The Wildfire Fund is expected to be funded partially by electrical corporation shareholders, and partly by ratepayers. If the first three quartersCompany decides to participate in the Wildfire Fund, it has until September 10, 2019 to make the initial contribution. At this time, a decision has not been made.
Contracted Services Segment:
ASUS's revenues, operating income and cash flows are earned by providing water and/or wastewater services, including operation and maintenance services and construction of 2016. Approximately $2.0 million of this amount would have loweredfacilities at the water gross margin during the three months ended September 30, 2016 had the CPUC decision been issued on time.
Ojai Water System
On April 12, 2017, the Board of Directors of Casitas Municipal Water District (“Casitas”) approved a settlement agreement with GSWC and a group of citizens referredand/or wastewater systems at various military installations, pursuant to as Ojai Friends of Locally Owned Water (“Ojai FLOW”), to resolve the eminent domain action and other litigation brought by Casitas and Ojai FLOW against GSWC. In accordance with the terms of the settlement agreement, on June 8, 2017 Casitas acquired the operating assets of GSWC’s 2,900-connection Ojai water system by eminent domain50-year firm fixed-price contracts. The contract price for $34.3 million in cash, including payments for customer receivables and regulatory assets, and Casitas and Ojai FLOW dismissed all claims against GSWC. As a result of the transaction, GSWC recorded a pretax gain of $8.3 million, or $0.13 per share, on the sale of the Ojai water system during the second quarter of 2017. The proceeds received from this transaction were used to repay a portion of GSWC’s short-term borrowings. Management is evaluating the long-term useeach of these proceeds.
New Privatization Contract Award
On September 29, 2017, ASUS was awarded a50-year contracts is subject to annual economic price adjustments. Additional revenues generated by contract operations are primarily dependent on new 50-yearconstruction activities under contract bymodifications with the U.S. government to operate, maintain,or agreements with other third-party prime contractors.
Fort Riley:
On July 1, 2018, ASUS assumed the operation, maintenance and provide construction management services forof the water distribution and wastewater collection and treatment facilities at Fort Riley, a United States Army installation located in Kansas. The initial value of the contract is approximately $601 million over the 50-year period and is subject to annual economic price adjustments. This initial value is also subject to adjustment based on
the results of a joint inventory of assets to be performed. ASUS will assume operations at Fort Riley following the completion of a six-to-twelve-month transition period currently underway.
Eglin Air Force Base (“Eglin”)
On June 15, 2017, ASUS assumed operations of the water and wastewater systems at Eglin in FloridaKansas, after completing a transition period and a detailed joint inventory study. The value of the 50-year contract is approximately $702 million. The contract is subject to annual economic price adjustments.
Summary of ThirdSecond Quarter Results by Segment
The table below sets forth the thirdsecond quarter diluted earnings per share by business segment:
| | | | | Diluted Earnings per Share | | Diluted Earnings per Share |
| | | Three Months Ended | | | | Three Months Ended | | |
| | | 9/30/2017 | | 9/30/2016 | | CHANGE | | 6/30/2019 | | 6/30/2018 | | CHANGE |
| Water | | $ | 0.44 |
| | $ | 0.47 |
| | $ | (0.03 | ) | |
| Water, excluding retroactive impact of CPUC decision on general rate case | | | $ | 0.51 |
| | $ | 0.35 |
| | $ | 0.16 |
|
| Electric | | 0.03 |
| | 0.02 |
| | 0.01 |
| | 0.01 |
| | 0.02 |
| | (0.01 | ) |
| Contracted services | | 0.10 |
| | 0.10 |
| | — |
| | 0.12 |
| | 0.06 |
| | 0.06 |
|
| AWR (parent) | | | — |
| | 0.01 |
| | (0.01 | ) |
| Consolidated diluted earnings per share, adjusted | | | 0.64 |
| | 0.44 |
| | 0.20 |
|
| Retroactive impact of CPUC decision in the water rate case for Q1 2019 | | | 0.08 |
| | — |
| | 0.08 |
|
| Consolidated diluted earnings per share, as reported | | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | (0.02 | ) | | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.44 |
| | $ | 0.28 |
|
Water Segment:
For the three months ended September 30, 2017, diluted earnings per share from the water segment decreased by $0.03 to $0.44 per share as compared to the same periodAs previously discussed, in 2016. Impacting the quarter-over-quarter comparison was a decrease in the water gross margin of $2.0 million, or $0.03 per share, that was not reflected in the results for the three months ended September 30, 2016 due to the delay byMay 2019, the CPUC in issuingissued a decision on the water general rate case, as previously discussed. In addition, surcharges were implemented in 2017 to recover previously incurred costs approved by the CPUC as part of the final decision on the water general rate case, issuedwhich will set new rates for 2019 through 2021. Since the new rates were retroactive to January 1, 2019, the impact of the new water rates for the first three months of 2018 is reflected in March 2017. the results for the second quarter of 2019. Of the water segment's $0.59 recorded earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2019, $0.08 per share related to the first three months of 2019, which is shown on a separate line in the table above.
Excluding the $0.08 per share retroactive impact of the general rate case related to the first quarter of 2019, diluted earnings from GSWC’s water operations for the three months ended June 30, 2019 were $0.51 per share. Included in the $0.51 per share was the recording of a $1.1 million reduction to administrative and general expense, positively impacting earnings by $0.02 per share, to reflect the recovery of costs previously expensed as incurred and tracked in memorandum accounts, which were approved in the May 2019 CPUC final decision. The following items also effected the comparability between the two periods (excluding the impact of billed surcharges, which have no impact to earnings):
An increase in revenues andthe water gross margin totaling $1.9 million from these surcharges wasincreased earnings by approximately $0.07 per share largely as a result of the May 2019 CPUC decision on the general rate case, which approved new water rates and adopted supply costs for 2019. As previously discussed, the 2019 water revenue requirement has also been reduced to reflect a decrease in depreciation expense, due to a reduction in the overall composite depreciation rates based on a revised study filed in the general rate case. The decrease in depreciation expense lowers the water gross margin, and is offset by a corresponding increasedecrease in operating expenses (primarily administrative and general)depreciation expense as discussed below, resulting in no impact to net earnings for the three months ended September 30, 2017.
Excluding the impact of the items discussed above, diluted earnings from the water segment for the quarter were unchanged as compared to the same period in 2016. There was anAn overall decrease in operating expenses (excluding supply costs) resulting mainly from, which positively impacted earnings by $0.06 per share mostly due to lower depreciation, maintenance costs as well asand administrative and general expenses. As discussed previously, the lower legal expenses relateddepreciation expense is reflected in the new revenue requirement approved in the general rate case. The decrease in maintenance expense was due, in part, to condemnation matters astiming of maintenance activity compared to the same period in 2016. There was also CPUC-approved2018. Maintenance expense is expected to increase during the second year rate increases effective January 1, 2017. These increases to earnings were mostly offset by lower water earnings as a resulthalf of the cessation of Ojai operations in June 2017, as well as a higher effective income tax rate2019 as compared to the third quarterfirst half of 2016.2019. The decrease in administrative and general expenses was due, in part, to timing differences related to the recognition of stock-based compensation expense, as well as lower outside services costs.
Electric Segment:
ForAn increase in the gains generated during the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, diluted2019 on Registrant's investments held to fund a retirement benefit plan due to market conditions, increasing water earnings from the electric segment increased by $0.01 per share, as compared to the same period of 2018.
Electric Segment:
Forthe three months ended June 30, 2019, diluted earnings from the electric segment were $0.01 per share as compared to $0.02 per share for the same period in 20162018. The decrease in earnings was largely due primarily to an increase in operating expenses without an increase in customer base rates due to delays in finalizing the pending electric general rate case. Because of the delay, billed electric revenues during the first six months of 2019, and all of 2018, were based on 2017 adopted rates, pending a lower effective income tax rate resulting from differences between book and taxable income that are treated as flow-through adjustmentsfinal decision by the CPUC in accordance with regulatory requirements (primarily related to plant,the rate case and compensation-related items). Flow-through adjustments increase or decrease tax expenseapplication, which will be retroactive to January 1, 2018.
As previously discussed, in one period, with an offsetting decrease or increase in another period.
In March 2016,July 2019, the CPUCassigned Administrative Law Judge issued a proposed decision granting a request filed by GSWC to deferon the nextelectric general rate case filing ofapproving a settlement agreement in its Bear Valley Electric Service ("BVES") division by one year. GSWC filed this general rate case in May 2017 forentirety. Had the new rates in years 2018 through 2021. Adopted base revenuesthe settlement agreement been approved by the CPUC and in place as of January 1, 2019, pretax income at the electric segment would have been higher by approximately $712,000, or $0.01 per share, for 2017 are based on 2016 adopted base revenues, adjusted forthe second quarter of 2019. This amount will be recorded when a change inCPUC decision is issued, along with $0.02 per share related to the general office allocation as stipulated in the CPUC's final decision on the water general rate case.first quarter of 2019 and $0.04 per share related to 2018.
Contracted Services Segment:
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 and 2016,2019, diluted earnings per share from the contracted services segment were $0.10$0.12 per share.share as compared to $0.06 per share for the same period in 2018 due, in part, to the commencement of operations at Fort Riley in July 2018. There was also an increase in management fee revenue for the third quarter of 2017fees and construction activity at several other military bases due to the successful resolution of various price adjustments and asset transfers during 2016 and 2017, and the revenue generated from Eglin since assuming the operation of its water and wastewater systems on June 15, 2017. Thisan overall increase in management fee revenue was offset by lower construction activity, andrespectively.
AWR (parent):
For the three months ended June 30, 2019, diluted earnings at AWR (parent) decreased $0.01 per share due primarily to higher operating expenses as compared to the third quarter of 2016.
state unitary taxes.
Summary of Year-to-Date Results by Segment
The table below sets forth the year-to-date diluted earnings per share by business segment:segment. | | | | | Diluted Earnings per Share | | Diluted Earnings per Share |
| | | Nine Months Ended | | | | Six Months Ended | | |
| | | 9/30/2017 | | 9/30/2016 | | CHANGE | | 6/30/2019 | | 6/30/2018 | | CHANGE |
| Water | | $ | 1.17 |
| | $ | 1.04 |
| | $ | 0.13 |
| | $ | 0.80 |
| | $ | 0.55 |
| | $ | 0.25 |
|
| Electric | | 0.09 |
| | 0.06 |
| | 0.03 |
| | 0.05 |
| | 0.06 |
| | (0.01 | ) |
| Contracted services | | 0.26 |
| | 0.20 |
| | 0.06 |
| | 0.22 |
| | 0.11 |
| | 0.11 |
|
| AWR (parent) | | 0.01 |
| | 0.02 |
| | (0.01 | ) | | — |
| | 0.01 |
| | (0.01 | ) |
| Consolidated diluted earnings per share, as reported | | $ | 1.53 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
| | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
| | $ | 0.34 |
|
Water Segment:
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, dilutedDiluted earnings per share from the water segment for the six months ended June 30, 2019 increased by $0.13 to $1.17$0.25 per share as compared to the same period in 20162018 largely due in large part, to the recognitionapproval of a pretax gain of $8.3the water general rate case in May 2019. Also, included in the earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2019 was the $1.1 million or $0.13reduction to administrative and general expense, positively impacting earnings by $0.02 per share, onto reflect the saleCPUC's approval for recovery of GSWC's Ojaicosts previously expensed as incurred and tracked in memorandum accounts. Excluding this $0.02 per share impact, diluted earnings per share from the water system insegment for the six months ended June 2017. Furthermore,30, 2019 increased by $0.23 per share due to the following two items related to other periods impacted the comparability of the results for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 which, when netted, negatively impacted the reported results through September 30, 2017 compared to 2016 by approximately $3.7 million, or $0.06 per share:(excluding billed surcharges):
A decreaseAn increase in the water gross margin of $5.2 million, or $0.08$0.11 per share, was not reflected in the results for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to the delayas a result of new rates authorized by the CPUC in issuing aCPUC's final decision on the water general rate case. When the decision was issued in December 2016 with new ratescase and retroactive to January 1, 2016, a cumulative downward adjustment of $5.2 million was recorded2019.
An overall decrease in operating expenses (excluding supply costs), positively impacting earnings by $0.07 per share due, in large part, to lower depreciation resulting from lower authorized composite rates recently approved in the water general rate case. The decrease in depreciation expense from lower composite rates also lowers the adopted water gross margin, resulting in no impact to net earnings. There was also a decrease in maintenance expense, which is expected to increase during the fourth quartersecond half of 2016, which related2019 as compared to the first three quartershalf of 2016.2019.
In February 2017, the CPUC approved recoveryAn increase in interest and other income, net of incremental costs relatedinterest expense, of $0.04 per share, due to California's drought state of emergency, which were previously expensed. As a result of this approval,higher gains generated during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 GSWC recorded2019 on Registrant's investments held to fund a regulatory assetretirement benefit plan, as compared to the same period of 2018 due to market conditions.
Changes in the effective income tax rate resulting from certain flow-through taxes and a corresponding increasepermanent items for the six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to pretaxthe same period in 2018, increased earnings of $1.5 million, or $0.02at the water segment by approximately $0.01 per share, of which $1.2 million was reflected as a reduction to other operation expenses and approximately $260,000 as additional revenue.share.
ExcludingElectric Segment:
For the impact of the items discussed above and a $3.1 million increase in billed surcharges which have no impact to earnings,six months ended June 30, 2019, diluted earnings from the waterelectric segment for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased by $0.06decreased $0.01 per share as compared to the same period in 2016.2018. The following items impacted the comparability between the two periods:
A decrease in earnings was largely due to an increase in operating expenses (excluding supply costs) of $3.2 million, or $0.05 per share, due mostly to lower legal expenses related to condemnation matters, as well as lower maintenance costs.
Anwithout an increase in interest and other income of $1.1 million, or $0.02 per share,customer base rates due to amounts collected from developersdelays in finalizing the pending electric general rate case. Because of the delay, billed electric revenues during the first six months of 2019, and all of 2018, were based on certain outstanding balances owed to GSWC and higher gains recorded on investments as compared to 2016.
A higher effective income tax rate, negatively impacting earnings2017 adopted rates, pending a final decision by $0.01 per share, resulting from differences between book and taxable income that are treated as flow-through adjustmentsthe CPUC in accordance with regulatory requirements (primarily plant,the rate case and compensation-related items).
An increaseapplication, which will be retroactive to January 1, 2018. Had the new rates in the water margin generated from CPUC-approved second year rate increases was largely offsetsettlement agreement been approved by the cessationCPUC and in place as of Ojai operations in June 2017.
Electric Segment:
Forthe nine months ended September 30, 2017, diluted earnings fromJanuary 1, 2019, pretax income at the electric segment were $0.09 per share as compared to $0.06would have been higher by approximately $1.7 million, or $0.03 per share, for the same period in 2016. Operating expenses (other than supply costs) decreased by $1.6 million primarily duefirst six months of 2019. This amount will be recorded when a final CPUC decision is issued, along with $0.04 per share related to additional costs incurred in 2016 in response to power outages caused by severe winter storms experienced in January 2016, lower regulatory costs, and lower costs associated with a solar power program approved by the CPUC. There was also a decrease in the effective income tax rate for the electric segment as compared to the same period in 2016 resulting from flow-through items as previously discussed. A lower electric gross margin was due to a downward adjustment to the revenue requirement, with a corresponding decrease in the allocation of general office expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings.2018.
Contracted Services Segment:
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, diluted earnings per share from the contracted services segment increased by $0.06 to $0.26were $0.22 per share as compared to $0.11 per share for the same period in 2016. There was an increase2018 due, in management fees frompart, to the successful resolutioncommencement of various price adjustments and asset transfers received during 2016 and 2017, including approximately $1.0 million, or $0.02 per share, of retroactive management fees recordedoperations at Fort Riley in 2017 which related to periods prior to 2017, as well as a higher direct construction margin resulting primarily from improved cost efficiencies.July 2018. There was also an increase in management fees and construction revenues generated from the operationsactivity at Eglin, which began in June 2017. These increases to earnings were partially offset by higher operation costsseveral other military bases due to Eglin's transition activitiesthe successful resolution of various price adjustments and joint inventory study, as well as increasesan overall increase in laborconstruction activity, respectively.
AWR (parent):
For the six months ended June 30, 2019 diluted earnings at AWR (parent) decreased $0.01 per share due primarily to higher state unitary taxes.
The following discussion and outside services costs relatedanalysis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 provides information on AWR’s consolidated operations and assets and, where necessary, includes specific references to business developmentAWR’s individual segments and compliance.subsidiaries: GSWC and ASUS and its subsidiaries.
Consolidated Results of Operations — Three Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 20162018 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts): | | | | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019 | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| OPERATING REVENUES | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Water | | $ | 91,919 |
| | $ | 90,617 |
| | $ | 1,302 |
| | 1.4 | % | | $ | 88,140 |
| | $ | 76,733 |
| | $ | 11,407 |
| | 14.9 | % |
| Electric | | 7,994 |
| | 8,146 |
| | (152 | ) | | (1.9 | )% | | 7,408 |
| | 7,841 |
| | (433 | ) | | (5.5 | )% |
| Contracted services | | 24,505 |
| | 25,043 |
| | (538 | ) | | (2.1 | )% | | 29,099 |
| | 22,327 |
| | 6,772 |
| | 30.3 | % |
| Total operating revenues | | 124,418 |
| | 123,806 |
| | 612 |
| | 0.5 | % | | 124,647 |
| | 106,901 |
| | 17,746 |
| | 16.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| OPERATING EXPENSES | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Water purchased | | 20,576 |
| | 19,631 |
| | 945 |
| | 4.8 | % | | 18,762 |
| | 16,608 |
| | 2,154 |
| | 13.0 | % |
| Power purchased for pumping | | 2,913 |
| | 2,988 |
| | (75 | ) | | (2.5 | )% | | 1,982 |
| | 2,231 |
| | (249 | ) | | (11.2 | )% |
| Groundwater production assessment | | 5,870 |
| | 4,482 |
| | 1,388 |
| | 31.0 | % | | 4,640 |
| | 4,534 |
| | 106 |
| | 2.3 | % |
| Power purchased for resale | | 2,439 |
| | 2,394 |
| | 45 |
| | 1.9 | % | | 2,391 |
| | 2,384 |
| | 7 |
| | 0.3 | % |
| Supply cost balancing accounts | | (4,621 | ) | | (4,213 | ) | | (408 | ) | | 9.7 | % | | 1,207 |
| | (2,029 | ) | | 3,236 |
| | (159.5 | )% |
| Other operation | | 7,657 |
| | 7,448 |
| | 209 |
| | 2.8 | % | | 7,708 |
| | 7,782 |
| | (74 | ) | | (1.0 | )% |
| Administrative and general | | 21,790 |
| | 19,768 |
| | 2,022 |
| | 10.2 | % | | 19,529 |
| | 20,213 |
| | (684 | ) | | (3.4 | )% |
| Depreciation and amortization | | 9,854 |
| | 9,486 |
| | 368 |
| | 3.9 | % | | 6,655 |
| | 10,010 |
| | (3,355 | ) | | (33.5 | )% |
| Maintenance | | 3,222 |
| | 4,203 |
| | (981 | ) | | (23.3 | )% | | 3,053 |
| | 3,670 |
| | (617 | ) | | (16.8 | )% |
| Property and other taxes | | 4,475 |
| | 4,317 |
| | 158 |
| | 3.7 | % | | 4,870 |
| | 4,372 |
| | 498 |
| | 11.4 | % |
| ASUS construction | | 11,693 |
| | 13,685 |
| | (1,992 | ) | | (14.6 | )% | | 14,532 |
| | 11,576 |
| | 2,956 |
| | 25.5 | % |
| Gain on sale of assets | | (17 | ) | | — |
| | (17 | ) | | — | % | | (112 | ) | | (18 | ) | | (94 | ) | | * |
|
| Total operating expenses | | 85,851 |
| | 84,189 |
| | 1,662 |
| | 2.0 | % | | 85,217 |
| | 81,333 |
| | 3,884 |
| | 4.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| OPERATING INCOME | | 38,567 |
| | 39,617 |
| | (1,050 | ) | | (2.7 | )% | | 39,430 |
| | 25,568 |
| | 13,862 |
| | 54.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest expense | | (5,775 | ) | | (5,730 | ) | | (45 | ) | | 0.8 | % | | (6,282 | ) | | (6,048 | ) | | (234 | ) | | 3.9 | % |
| Interest income | | 321 |
| | 206 |
| | 115 |
| | 55.8 | % | | 876 |
| | 636 |
| | 240 |
| | 37.7 | % |
| Other, net | | 401 |
| | 254 |
| | 147 |
| | 57.9 | % | | 591 |
| | 579 |
| | 12 |
| | 2.1 | % |
| | | (5,053 | ) | | (5,270 | ) | | 217 |
| | (4.1 | )% | | (4,815 | ) | | (4,833 | ) | | 18 |
| | (0.4 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE | | 33,514 |
| | 34,347 |
| | (833 | ) | | (2.4 | )% | | 34,615 |
| | 20,735 |
| | 13,880 |
| | 66.9 | % |
| Income tax expense | | 12,508 |
| | 12,708 |
| | (200 | ) | | (1.6 | )% | | 7,831 |
| | 4,387 |
| | 3,444 |
| | 78.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| NET INCOME | | $ | 21,006 |
| | $ | 21,639 |
| | $ | (633 | ) | | (2.9 | )% | | $ | 26,784 |
| | $ | 16,348 |
| | $ | 10,436 |
| | 63.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Basic earnings per Common Share | | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | (0.02 | ) | | (3.4 | )% | | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.44 |
| | $ | 0.28 |
| | 63.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Fully diluted earnings per Common Share | | $ | 0.57 |
| | $ | 0.59 |
| | $ | (0.02 | ) | | (3.4 | )% | | $ | 0.72 |
| | $ | 0.44 |
| | $ | 0.28 |
| | 63.6 | % |
* not meaningful
Operating Revenues:
General
RegistrantGSWC relies upon approvals by the CPUC of rate increases to recover operating expenses and to provide for a return on invested and borrowed capital used to fund utility plant for GSWC. Registrant relies on economic price and equitable adjustments by the U.S. government in order to recover operating expenses and provide a profit margin for ASUS. If adequate rate relief or adjustments are not granted in a timely manner, currentCurrent operating revenues and earnings can be negatively impacted.impacted if the Military Privatization Subsidiaries do not receive adequate rate relief or adjustments in a timely manner. ASUS’s earnings are also impacted by the level of additional construction projects at the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries, which may or may not continue at current levels in future periods.
Water
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, revenues from water operations increased $1.3$11.4 million to $91.9$88.1 million as compared to the same period in 2016. The increase was2018 due primarily to CPUC-approved second-year rate increases effectivenew water rates approved in the May 2019 CPUC decision, which was retroactive to January 1, 2017, as well as2019. As a $1.9 million increase in CPUC-approved surcharges to recover previously incurred costs. The new surcharges implemented during 2017 were offset by a corresponding increase in operating expenses (primarily administrative and general) totaling $1.9 million, resulting in noresult, the cumulative retroactive impact to earnings. Furthermore, in July 2017,of the CPUC approveddecision was recorded during the second quarter of 2019. Approximately $3.4 million of the $88.1 million in revenues recorded in the second quarter of 2019 relates to the first quarter of 2019. There were also revenue increases related to CPUC-approved rate increases implemented for certain rate-making areasin July of 2018 to specifically cover increases in supply costs experienced in these areas. This increase in revenue is mostlymost ratemaking areas, which were largely offset by a corresponding increase in supply costs, resulting in an insignificant changeimmaterial impact to the water gross margin.
Partially offsetting the increases discussed above was the cessation of Ojai operations due to the sale of the water system in June 2017, as well as a decrease in water revenues of approximately $1.0 million that was not reflected in the results for the three months ended September 30, 2016 due to the delay by the CPUC in issuing a decision on the water general rate case. As previously discussed in the "Overview" section, the water gross margin recorded through September 30, 2016 reflected GSWC's litigated positions in the then pending water general rate case, which assumed the CPUC would adopt GSWC’s positions in their entirety. When the decision was issued in December 2016 with new rates retroactive to January 1, 2016, GSWC recorded a cumulative downward adjustment of $5.2 million to the water gross margin in the fourth quarter of 2016 related to the first three quarters of 2016. Of this amount, $2.0 million related to the third quarter of 2016, which would have decreased revenues by $1.0 million and increased supply costs by $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2016 had the CPUC decision been issued on time.earnings.
Billed water consumption for the thirdsecond quarter of 2017 increased2019 decreased by approximately 5.6%5% as compared to the same period in 2016.2018 due to wet weather conditions experienced in late 2018 and early 2019. In general, changes in consumption do not have a significant impact on recorded revenues due to the CPUC-approved Water Revenue Adjustment Mechanism ("WRAM") accounts in place at all but one small rate-making area. However, under the accounting guidance for alternative revenue programs such as the WRAM, significant decreases in consumption may impact the timing of when revenues are recorded. GSWC records the difference between what it bills its water customers and that which is authorized by the CPUC in the WRAM accounts as regulatory assets or liabilities.
Electric
Electric
In 2016, the CPUC granted BVES's request to defer the filing ofGSWC filed its next electric general rate case toin May 2017 setting newfor rates in years 2018 through 2021. AsPending a result, adopted basefinal CPUC decision on the general rate case, year-to-date billed revenues through June 30, 2019 and for 2017 areall of 2018, have been based on 20162017 adopted base revenues adjusted forrates. On July 16, 2019, the change inassigned Administrative Law Judge issued a proposed decision on the general office allocation approved by the CPUC in the waterelectric general rate case. Forcase, approving a November 2018 settlement agreement in its entirety. Once approved, the three months ended September 30, 2017, revenues from electric operations decreased slightlygeneral rate case will be retroactive to $8.0 million as compared to $8.1 million for the same period in 2016 due, in part, to the downward adjustment in the revenue requirement for 2017 with a corresponding and offsetting reduction in the general office allocation. This decrease in revenues was partially offset by rate increases generated from advice letter capital projects approved by the CPUC during 2016 and 2017.January 1, 2018.
Billed electric usage during the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 was mostly unchanged2019 increased by approximately 2% as compared to the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2018. Due to the CPUC-approved Base Revenue Requirement Adjustment Mechanism ("BRRAM"), which adjusts certain revenues to adopted levels authorized by the CPUC, changes in usage do not have a significant impact on earnings.
Contracted Services
Revenues from contracted services are composed of construction revenues (including renewal and replacements) and management fees for operating and maintaining the water and/or wastewater systems at various military bases. For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, revenues from contracted services decreased $538,000increased $6.8 million to $24.5$29.1 million as compared to $25.0$22.3 million for the same period in 2016 due primarily to lower construction activities. This decrease construction was partially
offset by an increase in management fee revenues2018 largely due to the successful resolutioncommencement of various price adjustmentsoperations at Fort Riley in July 2018. There were also increases in management fees and asset transfers received during 2016 and 2017.
construction activity at several other military bases.
ASUS subsidiaries continue to enter into U.S. government-awarded contract modifications and agreements with third-party prime contractors for new construction projects at the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries. During the first nine months of 2017, ASUS was awarded $20.1 million in new construction projects, the majority of which are expected to be completed through 2018. During 2016, ASUS was awarded approximately $24.0 million in new construction projects, the majority of which have, or are expected to be completed, through 2017. Earnings and cash flows from modifications to the original 50-year contracts with the U.S. government and agreements with third-party prime contractors for additional construction projects may or may not continue in future periods.
Operating Expenses:
Supply Costs
Supply costs for the water segment consist of purchased water, purchased power for pumping, groundwater production assessments and changes in the water supply cost balancing accounts. Supply costs for the electric segment consist of purchased power for resale, the cost of natural gas used by BVES’s generating unit, the cost of renewable energy credits and changes in the electric supply cost balancing account. Water and electric gross margins are computed by subtracting total supply costs from total revenues. Registrant uses these gross margins and related percentages as an important measure in evaluating its operating results. Registrant believes these measures are useful internal benchmarks in evaluating the utility business performance within its water and electric segments. Registrant reviews these measurements regularly and compares them to historical periods and to its operating budget. However, these measures, which are not presented in accordance with GAAP, may not be comparable to
similarly titled measures used by other entities, and should not be considered as an alternative to operating income, which is determined in accordance with GAAP.
Total supply costs comprise the largest segment of total operating expenses. Supply costs accounted for approximately 31.7%34.0% and 30.0%29.2% of total operating expenses for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.
The table below provides the amountamounts (in thousands) of increases (decreases) and percent changes in water and electric revenues, supply costs and gross margin during the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016 (dollar amounts2018. There was a slight decrease in thousands):surcharges recorded in water revenues to recover previously incurred costs, which did not impact water earnings. Surcharges to recover previously incurred costs are recorded to revenues when billed to customers and are offset by a corresponding amount in operating expenses (primarily administrative and general), resulting in no impact to earnings.
| | | | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019 | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
WATER OPERATING REVENUES (1) | | $ | 91,919 |
| | $ | 90,617 |
| | $ | 1,302 |
| | 1.4 | % | | $ | 88,140 |
| | $ | 76,733 |
| | $ | 11,407 |
| | 14.9 | % |
| WATER SUPPLY COSTS: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Water purchased (1) | | $ | 20,576 |
| | $ | 19,631 |
| | $ | 945 |
| | 4.8 | % | | $ | 18,762 |
| | $ | 16,608 |
| | $ | 2,154 |
| | 13.0 | % |
| Power purchased for pumping (1) | | 2,913 |
| | 2,988 |
| | (75 | ) | | (2.5 | )% | | 1,982 |
| | 2,231 |
| | (249 | ) | | (11.2 | )% |
| Groundwater production assessment (1) | | 5,870 |
| | 4,482 |
| | 1,388 |
| | 31.0 | % | | 4,640 |
| | 4,534 |
| | 106 |
| | 2.3 | % |
| Water supply cost balancing accounts (1) | | (5,245 | ) | | (4,843 | ) | | (402 | ) | | 8.3 | % | | 691 |
| | (2,471 | ) | | 3,162 |
| | (128.0 | )% |
| TOTAL WATER SUPPLY COSTS | | $ | 24,114 |
| | $ | 22,258 |
| | $ | 1,856 |
| | 8.3 | % | | $ | 26,075 |
| | $ | 20,902 |
| | $ | 5,173 |
| | 24.7 | % |
| WATER GROSS MARGIN (2) | | $ | 67,805 |
| | $ | 68,359 |
| | $ | (554 | ) | | (0.8 | )% | | $ | 62,065 |
| | $ | 55,831 |
| | $ | 6,234 |
| | 11.2 | % |
| | |
| | | |
| | |
| | |
| | | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ELECTRIC OPERATING REVENUES (1) | | $ | 7,994 |
| | $ | 8,146 |
| | $ | (152 | ) | | (1.9 | )% | | $ | 7,408 |
| | $ | 7,841 |
| | $ | (433 | ) | | (5.5 | )% |
| ELECTRIC SUPPLY COSTS: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Power purchased for resale (1) | | $ | 2,439 |
| | $ | 2,394 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | 1.9 | % | | $ | 2,391 |
| | $ | 2,384 |
| | $ | 7 |
| | 0.3 | % |
| Electric supply cost balancing accounts (1) | | 624 |
| | 630 |
| | (6 | ) | | (1.0 | )% | | 516 |
| | 442 |
| | 74 |
| | 16.7 | % |
| TOTAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY COSTS | | $ | 3,063 |
| | $ | 3,024 |
| | $ | 39 |
| | 1.3 | % | | $ | 2,907 |
| | $ | 2,826 |
| | $ | 81 |
| | 2.9 | % |
| ELECTRIC GROSS MARGIN (2) | | $ | 4,931 |
| | $ | 5,122 |
| | $ | (191 | ) | | (3.7 | )% | | $ | 4,501 |
| | $ | 5,015 |
| | $ | (514 | ) | | (10.2 | )% |
| | | | | | |
| | |
| |
(1)As reported on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income, except for supply cost balancing accounts. The sum of water and electric supply cost balancing accounts in the table above are shown onin AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and
totaled $(4,621,000)$1,207,000 and $(4,213,000)$(2,029,000) for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. Revenues include surcharges, which increase both revenues and operating expenses by corresponding amounts, thus having no net earnings impact.
(2)Water and electric gross margins do not include any depreciation and amortization, maintenance, administrative and general, property or other taxes or other operation expenses.
Two of the principal factors affecting water supply costs are the amount of water produced and the source of the water. Generally, the variable cost of producing water from wells is less than the cost of water purchased from wholesale suppliers. Under the CPUC-approved Modified Cost Balancing Account ("MCBA"), GSWC tracks adopted and actual expense levels for purchased water, power purchased for pumping and pump taxes. GSWC records the variances (which include the effects of changes in both rate and volume) between adopted and actual purchased water, purchased power, and pump tax expenses. GSWC recovers from, or refunds to, customers the amount of such variances. GSWC tracks these variances individually for each water ratemaking area.
The overall actual percentagepercentages of purchased water for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 was 46%2019 and 2018 were approximately 45% and 40%, respectively, as compared to the authorized adopted percentagepercentages of 31%.36% and 29% for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The higher actual percentage of purchased water as compared to the adopted percentage resulted from an increase ina higher volume of purchased water as part of GSWC's supply mixcosts due to several wells being out of service.
Purchased water costs for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 increased to $20.6$18.8 million as compared to $19.6$16.6 million for the same period in 2016 primarily2018. The decrease in power purchased for pumping was due to an increase in wholesalea higher mix of purchased water rates as well as an increase in water purchased as part of GSWC's water supply mix.
compared to pumped water. Groundwater production assessments increased $1.4 million due to an increaseincreased rates charged to GSWC, partially offset by a decrease in pump tax rates and pump taxes paid for water storage rightscustomer usage as compared to the same period in 2016.2018.
The under-collectionbalance in the water supply cost balancing account increased $402,000by $3.2 million to an over-collection balance during the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 20162019 mainly due to higher purchasedupdated adopted supply cost expenses from the approved water general rate case. This increase includes a $1.7 million increase, which relates to the first quarter of 2019 to reflect new adopted supply costs as comparedretroactive to January 1, 2019, with a corresponding and offsetting increase in adopted water supply costs.revenues, resulting in no impact to earnings.
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30,2017 2019 and 2016,2018, the cost of power purchased for resale to BVES's customers was $2.4 million$2.4 million. The over-collection in the electric supply cost balancing account increased as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2018 due to a decrease in the average price per megawatt-hour ("MWh"). The average price per MWh, including fixed costs, increaseddecreased from $69.87$85.17 for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162018 to $73.81$79.34 for the same period in 2017. The over-collection in the electric supply cost balancing account decreased slightly due to the increase in the average price per MWh.2019.
Other Operation
The primary components of other operation expenses for GSWC include payroll, materials and supplies, chemicals and water treatment costs and outside service costs of operating the regulated water systems, including the costs associated with water transmission and distribution, pumping, water quality, meter reading, billing, and operations of district offices.offices as well as the electric system. Registrant’s contracted services operations incur many of the same types of expenses as well. For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30,20172019 and 20162018, other operation expenses by business segment consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands): | | | | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019 | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 5,817 |
| | $ | 5,847 |
| | $ | (30 | ) | | (0.5 | )% | | $ | 5,433 |
| | $ | 5,765 |
| | $ | (332 | ) | | (5.8 | )% |
| Electric Services | | 676 |
| | 757 |
| | (81 | ) | | (10.7 | )% | | 621 |
| | 654 |
| | (33 | ) | | (5.0 | )% |
| Contracted Services | | 1,164 |
| | 844 |
| | 320 |
| | 37.9 | % | | 1,654 |
| | 1,363 |
| | 291 |
| | 21.3 | % |
| Total other operation | | $ | 7,657 |
| | $ | 7,448 |
| | $ | 209 |
| | 2.8 | % | | $ | 7,708 |
| | $ | 7,782 |
| | $ | (74 | ) | | (1.0 | )% |
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, other operation expense at the water segment decreased primarily due to lower water treatment and conservation costs. For the three months ended June 30, 2019, total other operation expenses for the contracted services segment increased mainly due primarily to an increase in bad debt reserve for work previously performed for another prime contractor, as well as costs associated with the commencement of operations at Eglin in June 2017.
Fort Riley on July 1, 2018.
Administrative and General
Administrative and general expenses include payroll related to administrative and general functions, all employee-related benefits, insurance expenses, outside legal and consulting fees, regulatory utility commissionregulatory-utility-commission expenses, expenses associated with being a public company and general corporate expenses charged to expense accounts. For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30,20172019 and 20162018, administrative and general expenses by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019 | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 15,158 |
| | $ | 13,851 |
| | $ | 1,307 |
| | 9.4 | % | | $ | 11,685 |
| | $ | 13,329 |
| | $ | (1,644 | ) | | (12.3 | )% |
| Electric Services | | 1,689 |
| | 1,982 |
| | (293 | ) | | (14.8 | )% | | 1,993 |
| | 1,849 |
| | 144 |
| | 7.8 | % |
| Contracted Services | | 4,940 |
| | 3,926 |
| | 1,014 |
| | 25.8 | % | | 5,849 |
| | 5,033 |
| | 816 |
| | 16.2 | % |
| AWR (parent) | | 3 |
| | 9 |
| | (6 | ) | | (66.7 | )% | | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — | % |
| Total administrative and general | | $ | 21,790 |
| | $ | 19,768 |
| | $ | 2,022 |
| | 10.2 | % | | $ | 19,529 |
| | $ | 20,213 |
| | $ | (684 | ) | | (3.4 | )% |
Surcharges were implementedFor the three months ended June 30, 2019, administrative and general expenses at the water segment decreased $1.6 million, which includes a $1.1 million reduction to reflect the CPUC's approval in 2017 to recoverMay 2018 for recovery of previously incurred administrative and generalcosts approved by the CPUC as part of the final decision on the water general rate case issuedthat were being tracked in March 2017. A $1.7 million increase in revenues and water gross margin from these surcharges was offset by a corresponding increaseCPUC-authorized memorandum accounts. The decrease in administrative and general expenses was also due to reflectdecreases in employee-related compensation and outside service costs. The decrease in employee-related compensation was due, in part, to timing differences related to the recoveryrecognition of these costs, resulting in no impact to earnings.stock-based compensation expense.
Excluding the increase in billed surcharges discussed above, which have no impact on earnings, duringFor the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019, the increase in administrative and general expenses for the watercontracted services segment decreased by approximately $400,000was due primarily to lower legal expenses related to condemnation matters as comparedhigher labor and labor-related costs largely due to the same periodcommencement of operations at Fort Riley in 2016.July 2018, and a greater proportion of shared services cost allocated to ASUS pursuant to the general rate case settlement.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, administrative2019 and general expenses for the electric segment decreased by $293,000 due to lower regulatory costs, as well as a lower allocation of general office expenses as compared to the same period in 2016. The lower allocation of general office expenses has also been reflected in the electric revenue requirement.
For the three months ended September 30, 2017, administrative and general expenses for contracted services increased by $1.0 million due primarily to an increase in labor and other employee-related benefits, as well as costs associated with the commencement of operations at Eglin in June 2017.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016,2018, depreciation and amortization by business segment consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019 | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 8,972 |
| | $ | 8,734 |
| | $ | 238 |
| | 2.7 | % | | $ | 5,405 |
| | $ | 8,866 |
| | $ | (3,461 | ) | | (39.0 | )% |
| Electric Services | | 537 |
| | 506 |
| | 31 |
| | 6.1 | % | | 601 |
| | 564 |
| | 37 |
| | 6.6 | % |
| Contracted Services | | 345 |
| | 246 |
| | 99 |
| | 40.2 | % | | 649 |
| | 580 |
| | 69 |
| | 11.9 | % |
| Total depreciation and amortization | | $ | 9,854 |
| | $ | 9,486 |
| | $ | 368 |
| | 3.9 | % | | $ | 6,655 |
| | $ | 10,010 |
| | $ | (3,355 | ) | | (33.5 | )% |
The increaseMay 2019 CPUC final decision in the water general rate case approved lower overall composite depreciation rates based on a revised depreciation study. The new composite rates are retroactive to January 1, 2019 and, as a result, the cumulative retroactive impact of the CPUC decision was recorded during the second quarter of 2019. The $5.4 million in depreciation expense duringat the water segment includes a reduction of approximately $1.7 million, which relates to the first three months ended September 30, 2017of 2019. The decrease in composite depreciation rates lowers the water gross margin, and is offset by a corresponding decrease in depreciation expense, resulting in no impact to net earnings. The decrease in depreciation expense resulting from the new composite rates was due primarily topartially offset by increased depreciation from additions to utility plant, partially offset by retirements recorded for the fourth quarter of 2016 and the first nine months of 2017, as well as the sale of the Ojai utility assets in June 2017.
plant.
Maintenance
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30,2017 2019 and 2016,2018, maintenance expense by business segment consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019 | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 2,513 |
| | $ | 3,521 |
| | $ | (1,008 | ) | | (28.6 | )% | | $ | 2,195 |
| | $ | 2,878 |
| | $ | (683 | ) | | (23.7 | )% |
| Electric Services | | 179 |
| | 123 |
| | 56 |
| | 45.5 | % | | 257 |
| | 292 |
| | (35 | ) | | (12.0 | )% |
| Contracted Services | | 530 |
| | 559 |
| | (29 | ) | | (5.2 | )% | | 601 |
| | 500 |
| | 101 |
| | 20.2 | % |
| Total maintenance | | $ | 3,222 |
| | $ | 4,203 |
| | $ | (981 | ) | | (23.3 | )% | | $ | 3,053 |
| | $ | 3,670 |
| | $ | (617 | ) | | (16.8 | )% |
Maintenance expense for water servicesoverall decreased by $1.0 millionprimarily due to an overall lower level of planned and unplanned maintenance at the water segment as compared to the same period in 2017,2018. Maintenance expense at the water segment is expected to increase during the second half of 2019 as well ascompared to the timingfirst half of planned2019. For the three months ended June 30, 2019, maintenance activities.
expense for the contracted services segment increased mainly due to the commencement of operations at Fort Riley on July 1, 2018.
Property and Other Taxes
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, property and other taxes by business segment consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019 | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 3,887 |
| | $ | 3,767 |
| | $ | 120 |
| | 3.2 | % | | $ | 4,171 |
| | $ | 3,749 |
| | $ | 422 |
| | 11.3 | % |
| Electric Services | | 257 |
| | 251 |
| | 6 |
| | 2.4 | % | | 251 |
| | 255 |
| | (4 | ) | | (1.6 | )% |
| Contracted Services | | 331 |
| | 299 |
| | 32 |
| | 10.7 | % | | 448 |
| | 368 |
| | 80 |
| | 21.7 | % |
| Total property and other taxes | | $ | 4,475 |
| | $ | 4,317 |
| | $ | 158 |
| | 3.7 | % | | $ | 4,870 |
| | $ | 4,372 |
| | $ | 498 |
| | 11.4 | % |
Property and other taxes increased overall by $158,000 during the three months ended September 30, 2017 due, primarilyin part, to capital additions.additions at the water segment. There was also an increase in local franchise fees paid to various municipalities and counties, which are derived based on revenues and utility plant. With the approval of the new water rate case, the increase in franchise fees is reflected in the newly adopted revenue requirement.
ASUS Construction
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30,2017, 2019, construction expenses for contracted services were $11.7$14.5 million,, decreasing $2.0 increasing $3.0 million compared to the same period in 20162018 due to loweran overall increase in construction activity.
activity, including the commencement of operations at Fort Riley.
Interest Expense
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, interest expense by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019 | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 5,290 |
| | $ | 5,343 |
| | $ | (53 | ) | | (1.0 | )% | | $ | 5,628 |
| | $ | 5,491 |
| | $ | 137 |
| | 2.5 | % |
| Electric Services | | 348 |
| | 330 |
| | 18 |
| | 5.5 | % | | 373 |
| | 366 |
| | 7 |
| | 1.9 | % |
| Contracted Services | | 62 |
| | 18 |
| | 44 |
| | 244.4 | % | | 115 |
| | 107 |
| | 8 |
| | 7.5 | % |
| AWR (parent) | | 75 |
| | 39 |
| | 36 |
| | 92.3 | % | | 166 |
| | 84 |
| | 82 |
| | 97.6 | % |
| Total interest expense | | $ | 5,775 |
| | $ | 5,730 |
| | $ | 45 |
| | 0.8 | % | | $ | 6,282 |
| | $ | 6,048 |
| | $ | 234 |
| | 3.9 | % |
The overall increase in interest expense is due to higher average borrowings as well as higher interest rates on the revolving credit facility as compared to 2018. In March 2019, AWR exercised an option in the credit facility to increase its borrowing capacity from $150.0 million to $200.0 million. Borrowings made during 2019 were used to repay $40.0 million of GSWC's 6.70% senior note, which matured in March 2019, as well as to fund a portion of GSWC's capital expenditures.
Interest Income
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30,2017 2019 and 2016,2018, interest income by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019 | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 316 |
| | $ | 198 |
| | $ | 118 |
| | 59.6 | % | | $ | 516 |
| | $ | 444 |
| | $ | 72 |
| | 16.2 | % |
| Electric Services | | 2 |
| | 2 |
| | — |
| | — | % | | 27 |
| | 13 |
| | 14 |
| | 107.7 | % |
| Contracted Services | | 4 |
| | 6 |
| | (2 | ) | | (33.3 | )% | | 334 |
| | 178 |
| | 156 |
| | 87.6 | % |
| AWR (parent) | | (1 | ) | | — |
| | (1 | ) | | — | % | | (1 | ) | | 1 |
| | (2 | ) | | (200.0 | )% |
| Total interest income | | $ | 321 |
| | $ | 206 |
| | $ | 115 |
| | 55.8 | % | | $ | 876 |
| | $ | 636 |
| | $ | 240 |
| | 37.7 | % |
The increase in interest income during the three months ended June 30, 2019 was largely due to interest income recognized on certain initial construction projects performed by the contracted services segment at Fort Riley during the three months ended June 30, 2019, as well as interest related to the collection of certain amounts from developers previously owed to GSWC.
Other, net
For the three months ended June 30, 2017,2019, other income increased by $147,000 due primarilywas relatively flat compared to higherthe same period in 2018. The increase in gains recorded on the Company's investments held for a retirement benefit plan because of recent market conditions as compared to the same period in 2016.2018, were mostly offset by an increase in the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit costs related to Registrant's defined benefit pension plan and other retirement benefits. However, as a result of GSWC's pension balancing account authorized by the CPUC, changes in net periodic benefit costs are mostly offset by corresponding changes in revenues, having no material impact to earnings.
Income Tax Expense
For the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, income tax expense by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Three Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019 | | Three Months Ended
June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 10,544 |
| | $ | 10,575 |
| | $ | (31 | ) | | (0.3 | )% | | $ | 6,812 |
| | $ | 3,909 |
| | $ | 2,903 |
| | 74.3 | % |
| Electric Services | | 269 |
| | 466 |
| | (197 | ) | | (42.3 | )% | | 14 |
| | 305 |
| | (291 | ) | | (95.4 | )% |
| Contracted Services | | 1,944 |
| | 1,951 |
| | (7 | ) | | (0.4 | )% | | 1,300 |
| | 705 |
| | 595 |
| | 84.4 | % |
| AWR (parent) | | (249 | ) | | (284 | ) | | 35 |
| | (12.3 | )% | | (295 | ) | | (532 | ) | | 237 |
| | (44.5 | )% |
| Total income tax expense | | $ | 12,508 |
| | $ | 12,708 |
| | $ | (200 | ) | | (1.6 | )% | | $ | 7,831 |
| | $ | 4,387 |
| | $ | 3,444 |
| | 78.5 | % |
Consolidated income tax expense for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 decreased2019 increased by $200,000$3.4 million due primarily to a decreasean increase in pretax income.income, largely due to the retroactive impact of the water general rate case. AWR's consolidated effective income tax rate ("ETR") was 37.3%22.6% and 21.2% for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 as compared to 37.0%2019 and 2018, respectively, and GSWC's ETR was 23.4% and 23.6% for the three months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016. The2019 and 2018, respectively. AWR's consolidated ETR increased primarily as a resultbecause of increases in the ETRhigher state unitary taxes at GSWC, which was 38.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to 38.2% applicable to the three months ended September 30, 2016. The change in GSWC's ETR was due primarily to differences between book and taxable income that are treated as flow-through adjustments in accordance with regulatory requirements (primarily related to plant, rate case and compensation-related items)AWR (parent). Flow-through adjustments increase or decrease tax expense in one period, with an offsetting decrease or increase in another period.
Consolidated Results of Operations — NineSix Months Ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 20162018 (amounts in thousands, except per share amounts): | | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| OPERATING REVENUES | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Water | | $ | 239,057 |
| | $ | 237,987 |
| | $ | 1,070 |
| | 0.4 | % | | $ | 152,863 |
| | $ | 141,145 |
| | $ | 11,718 |
| | 8.3 | % |
| Electric | | 26,108 |
| | 26,420 |
| | (312 | ) | | (1.2 | )% | | 18,037 |
| | 17,673 |
| | 364 |
| | 2.1 | % |
| Contracted services | | 71,258 |
| | 64,880 |
| | 6,378 |
| | 9.8 | % | | 55,480 |
| | 42,811 |
| | 12,669 |
| | 29.6 | % |
| Total operating revenues | | 336,423 |
| | 329,287 |
| | 7,136 |
| | 2.2 | % | | 226,380 |
| | 201,629 |
| | 24,751 |
| | 12.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| OPERATING EXPENSES | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Water purchased | | 50,619 |
| | 49,265 |
| | 1,354 |
| | 2.7 | % | | 31,902 |
| | 30,215 |
| | 1,687 |
| | 5.6 | % |
| Power purchased for pumping | | 6,667 |
| | 6,752 |
| | (85 | ) | | (1.3 | )% | | 3,520 |
| | 3,924 |
| | (404 | ) | | (10.3 | )% |
| Groundwater production assessment | | 14,176 |
| | 11,150 |
| | 3,026 |
| | 27.1 | % | | 8,386 |
| | 9,185 |
| | (799 | ) | | (8.7 | )% |
| Power purchased for resale | | 7,847 |
| | 7,481 |
| | 366 |
| | 4.9 | % | | 6,095 |
| | 5,792 |
| | 303 |
| | 5.2 | % |
| Supply cost balancing accounts | | (11,663 | ) | | (10,145 | ) | | (1,518 | ) | | 15.0 | % | | (165 | ) | | (5,898 | ) | | 5,733 |
| | (97.2 | )% |
| Other operation | | 21,989 |
| | 21,331 |
| | 658 |
| | 3.1 | % | | 16,279 |
| | 15,770 |
| | 509 |
| | 3.2 | % |
| Administrative and general | | 62,534 |
| | 61,829 |
| | 705 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 41,201 |
| | 40,506 |
| | 695 |
| | 1.7 | % |
| Depreciation and amortization | | 29,184 |
| | 28,878 |
| | 306 |
| | 1.1 | % | | 17,487 |
| | 19,676 |
| | (2,189 | ) | | (11.1 | )% |
| Maintenance | | 10,292 |
| | 11,908 |
| | (1,616 | ) | | (13.6 | )% | | 5,619 |
| | 7,499 |
| | (1,880 | ) | | (25.1 | )% |
| Property and other taxes | | 13,386 |
| | 12,863 |
| | 523 |
| | 4.1 | % | | 9,766 |
| | 9,171 |
| | 595 |
| | 6.5 | % |
| ASUS construction | | 34,589 |
| | 35,351 |
| | (762 | ) | | (2.2 | )% | | 26,777 |
| | 21,548 |
| | 5,229 |
| | 24.3 | % |
| Gain on sale of assets | | (8,318 | ) | | — |
| | (8,318 | ) | | — | % | | (112 | ) | | (18 | ) | | (94 | ) | | * |
|
| Total operating expenses | | 231,302 |
| | 236,663 |
| | (5,361 | ) | | (2.3 | )% | | 166,755 |
| | 157,370 |
| | 9,385 |
| | 6.0 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| OPERATING INCOME | | 105,121 |
| | 92,624 |
| | 12,497 |
| | 13.5 | % | | 59,625 |
| | 44,259 |
| | 15,366 |
| | 34.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Interest expense | | (17,606 | ) | | (16,956 | ) | | (650 | ) | | 3.8 | % | | (12,599 | ) | | (11,971 | ) | | (628 | ) | | 5.2 | % |
| Interest income | | 1,200 |
| | 568 |
| | 632 |
| | 111.3 | % | | 1,818 |
| | 1,172 |
| | 646 |
| | 55.1 | % |
| Other, net | | 1,454 |
| | 872 |
| | 582 |
| | 66.7 | % | | 1,933 |
| | 621 |
| | 1,312 |
| | 211.3 | % |
| | | (14,952 | ) | | (15,516 | ) | | 564 |
| | (3.6 | )% | | (8,848 | ) | | (10,178 | ) | | 1,330 |
| | (13.1 | )% |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE | | 90,169 |
| | 77,108 |
| | 13,061 |
| | 16.9 | % | | 50,777 |
| | 34,081 |
| | 16,696 |
| | 49.0 | % |
| Income tax expense | | 33,670 |
| | 28,577 |
| | 5,093 |
| | 17.8 | % | | 11,141 |
| | 6,951 |
| | 4,190 |
| | 60.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| NET INCOME | | $ | 56,499 |
| | $ | 48,531 |
| | $ | 7,968 |
| | 16.4 | % | | $ | 39,636 |
| | $ | 27,130 |
| | $ | 12,506 |
| | 46.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Basic earnings per Common Share | | $ | 1.53 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
| | 15.9 | % | | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 0.74 |
| | $ | 33.00 |
| | 44.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Fully diluted earnings per Common Share | | $ | 1.53 |
| | $ | 1.32 |
| | $ | 0.21 |
| | 15.9 | % | | $ | 1.07 |
| | $ | 0.73 |
| | $ | 34.00 |
| | 46.6 | % |
* not meaningful
Operating Revenues:
Water
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, revenues from water operations increased $1.1$11.7 million to $239.1$152.9 million as compared to the same period in 2016 primarily due to second-year rate increases2018 as a result of new CPUC-approved water rates effective January 1, 2017, and2019 as part of the May 2019 general rate case final decision. There were also revenue increases related to CPUC-approved rate increases implemented in July of 2018 to specifically cover increases in supply costs experienced in certain rate-making areas. The increases related to supply costs aremost ratemaking areas, which were largely offset by a corresponding increase in supply costs, resulting in an insignificant changeimmaterial impact to earnings. These increases were partially offset by the water gross margin. Furthermore, thereexpiration of various surcharges that were also new surcharges implemented during 2017in place to recover previously incurred costs, whichcosts. The decrease in surcharge revenues was offset by a corresponding increasedecrease in operating expenses (primarily administrative and general) totaling $3.1 million, but resulted, also resulting in no impact to earnings.
The increases in water revenue discussed above were largely offset by the cessation of Ojai operations in June 2017, as well as a decrease in water revenues of approximately $2.6 million that was not reflected in the results for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due to the delay by the CPUC in issuing a decision on the water general rate case. As previously discussed in the "Overview" section, the water gross margin recorded through September 30, 2016 reflected GSWC's litigated positions in the then pending water general rate case, which assumed the CPUC would adopt GSWC’s positions in their entirety. When the decision was issued in December 2016 with new rates retroactive to January 1, 2016, a cumulative downward adjustment of $5.2 million to the water gross margin was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2016 related to the first three quarters of 2016. The $5.2 million downward adjustment would have decreased revenues by $2.6 million and increased supply costs by $2.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 had the CPUC decision been issued on time.
Billed water consumption for the first ninesix months of 2017 increased 2.5%2019 decreased approximately 10% as compared to the same period in 2016.2018. Changes in consumption generally do not have a significant impact on revenues due to the WRAM.
Electric
Adopted base revenues for 2017 are based on 2016 adopted base revenues, adjusted for the change in the general office allocation. For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, revenues from electric operations were $26.1$18.0 million as compared to $26.4$17.7 million for the same period in 2016 due to the downward adjustment in the revenue requirement for 2017 with2018. Pending a corresponding and offsetting reduction in the general office allocation as stipulated in the CPUC's final decision on the waterelectric general rate case. There was alsocase, which will be retroactive to January 1, 2018 once a decrease due tofinal CPUC decision is received, year-to-date billed revenues through June 30, 2019 and for all of 2018, have been based on 2017 adopted rates. On July 16, 2019, the recognition of approximately $300,000assigned Administrative Law Judge issued a proposed decision on the electric general rate case approving the November 2018 settlement agreement in BRRAM revenuesits entirety. A final decision is expected during the nine months ended September 30, 2016 that had previously been deferred. There was no similar item in 2017. These decreases were partially offset by rate increases generated from advice letter capital projects approved by the CPUC during 2016 and 2017.third or fourth quarter of 2019.
Billed electric usage increased by approximately 1%7% during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.2018. Due to the CPUC-approved BRRAM,Base Revenue Requirement Adjustment Mechanism, which adjusts certain revenues to adopted levels authorized by the CPUC, changes in usage do not have a significant impact on earnings.
Contracted Services
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, revenues from contracted services increased $6.4$12.7 million to $71.3$55.5 million as compared to $64.9$42.8 million for the same period in 20162018 due largelyprimarily to an increase in management fees resulting from the successful resolution of several price adjustments and asset transfers during 2016 and 2017, including the third price redetermination for Fort Bragg in June 2017. This third price redetermination was retroactive to March 2016, resulting in $1.0 million in management fees recorded in 2017 related to periods prior to 2017. There were also management fees and construction revenues related to Eglin, which ASUS began operating in June 2017. Finally, there was an overall increase in construction activities duringrevenue, as well as the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same periodcommencement of operations at Fort Riley in 2016.
July 2018.
Operating Expenses:
Supply Costs
Total supply costs comprise the largest segment of total operating expenses. Supply costs accounted for approximately 29.2%29.8% and 27.3%27.5% of total operating expenses for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively.
The table below provides the amount of increases (decreases) and percent changes in water and electric revenues, supply costs and gross margin during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 20162018 (dollar amounts in thousands):. There was a decrease in surcharges of $466,000 recorded in water revenues, which did not impact water earnings. Surcharges are recorded to revenues when billed to customers and are offset by a corresponding increase in operating expenses (primarily administrative and general), resulting in no impact to earnings.
| | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| WATER OPERATING REVENUES (1) | | $ | 239,057 |
| | $ | 237,987 |
| | $ | 1,070 |
| | 0.4 | % | | $ | 152,863 |
| | $ | 141,145 |
| | $ | 11,718 |
| | 8.3 | % |
| WATER SUPPLY COSTS: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Water purchased (1) | | $ | 50,619 |
| | $ | 49,265 |
| | $ | 1,354 |
| | 2.7 | % | | $ | 31,902 |
| | $ | 30,215 |
| | $ | 1,687 |
| | 5.6 | % |
| Power purchased for pumping (1) | | 6,667 |
| | 6,752 |
| | (85 | ) | | (1.3 | )% | | 3,520 |
| | 3,924 |
| | (404 | ) | | (10.3 | )% |
| Groundwater production assessment (1) | | 14,176 |
| | 11,150 |
| | 3,026 |
| | 27.1 | % | | 8,386 |
| | 9,185 |
| | (799 | ) | | (8.7 | )% |
| Water supply cost balancing accounts (1) | | (13,785 | ) | | (12,420 | ) | | (1,365 | ) | | 11.0 | % | | (1,428 | ) | | (6,839 | ) | | 5,411 |
| | (79.1 | )% |
| TOTAL WATER SUPPLY COSTS | | $ | 57,677 |
| | $ | 54,747 |
| | $ | 2,930 |
| | 5.4 | % | | $ | 42,380 |
| | $ | 36,485 |
| | $ | 5,895 |
| | 16.2 | % |
| WATER GROSS MARGIN (2) | | $ | 181,380 |
| | $ | 183,240 |
| | $ | (1,860 | ) | | (1.0 | )% | | $ | 110,483 |
| | $ | 104,660 |
| | $ | 5,823 |
| | 5.6 | % |
| | | | | | |
| | |
| | | | | | |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| ELECTRIC OPERATING REVENUES (1) | | $ | 26,108 |
| | $ | 26,420 |
| | $ | (312 | ) | | (1.2 | )% | | $ | 18,037 |
| | $ | 17,673 |
| | $ | 364 |
| | 2.1 | % |
| ELECTRIC SUPPLY COSTS: | | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
|
| Power purchased for resale (1) | | $ | 7,847 |
| | $ | 7,481 |
| | $ | 366 |
| | 4.9 | % | | $ | 6,095 |
| | 5,792 |
| | $ | 303 |
| | 5.2 | % |
| Electric supply cost balancing accounts (1) | | 2,122 |
| | 2,275 |
| | (153 | ) | | (6.7 | )% | | 1,263 |
| | 941 |
| | 322 |
| | 34.2 | % |
| TOTAL ELECTRIC SUPPLY COSTS | | $ | 9,969 |
| | $ | 9,756 |
| | $ | 213 |
| | 2.2 | % | | $ | 7,358 |
| | $ | 6,733 |
| | $ | 625 |
| | 9.3 | % |
| ELECTRIC GROSS MARGIN (2) | | $ | 16,139 |
| | $ | 16,664 |
| | $ | (525 | ) | | (3.2 | )% | | $ | 10,679 |
| | $ | 10,940 |
| | $ | (261 | ) | | (2.4 | )% |
| | | | | | |
| | |
| |
(1)As reported on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income, except for supply cost balancing accounts. The sum of water and electric supply cost balancing accounts in the table above are shown on AWR’s Consolidated Statements of Income and totaled $(11,663,000)$(165,000) and $(10,145,000)$(5,898,000) for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, respectively. Revenues include surcharges, which increase both revenues and operating expenses by corresponding amounts, thus having no net earnings impact.
(2)Water and electric gross margins do not include any depreciation and amortization, maintenance, administrative and general, property or other taxes or other operation expenses.
The overall actual percentagepercentages of purchased water for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017 was 41%2019 and 2018 were 44% and 40%, respectively, as compared to the adopted percentage of approximately 29%.35% and 27% for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The higher actual percentages of purchased water as compared to adopted percentages resulted primarily from several wells being out of service.
Purchased water costs for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 increased to $50.6$31.9 million as compared to $49.3$30.2 million for the same period in 2016,2018 primarily due to an increase in wholesale water rates as well as an increasecosts, partially offset by a decrease in customer usage.
For the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, power purchased waterfor pumping decreased by $404,000 due to several wells being outa higher mix of service,purchased water as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, groundwaterpumped water. Groundwater production assessments increased $3.0 milliondecreased $799,000 due to an increasea decrease in the amount of water pumped, partially offset by higher pump tax rates and pump taxes paid for water storage rights during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to the same period in 2016.2018.
The under-collection in the water supply cost balancing account increased $1.4decreased $5.4 million during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to the same period in 20162018 mainly due to updated adopted supply cost amounts from the higher purchased water costs as well as higher groundwater production assessments as compared to adoptedgeneral rate case, resulting in a lower under-collection in the water supply costs.cost balancing account.
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, the cost of power purchased for resale to BVES's customers increased by $366,000$303,000 to $7.8$6.1 million as compared to $7.5$5.8 million for the same period in 20162018 due primarily to an increase in the average price per MWh. The average price per MWh, including fixed costs, increased from $69.54$78.50 for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162018 to $74.17$81.24 for the same period in 2017.2019. The over-collection in the electric supply cost balancing account decreasedincreased by $153,000$322,000 due primarily to an increase in electric customer usage, partially offset by the increase in the weighted average price per MWh.
Other Operation
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, other operation expenses by business segment consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands): | | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 16,100 |
| | $ | 16,294 |
| | $ | (194 | ) | | (1.2 | )% | | $ | 11,478 |
| | $ | 11,487 |
| | $ | (9 | ) | | (0.1 | )% |
| Electric Services | | 2,042 |
| | 2,549 |
| | (507 | ) | | (19.9 | )% | | 1,436 |
| | 1,366 |
| | 70 |
| | 5.1 | % |
| Contracted Services | | 3,847 |
| | 2,488 |
| | 1,359 |
| | 54.6 | % | | 3,365 |
| | 2,917 |
| | 448 |
| | 15.4 | % |
| Total other operation | | $ | 21,989 |
| | $ | 21,331 |
| | $ | 658 |
| | 3.1 | % | | $ | 16,279 |
| | $ | 15,770 |
| | $ | 509 |
| | 3.2 | % |
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, total overall other operation expenses for the water segment decreased by $194,000 as compared to the same period in 2016 due, in large part, to the CPUC's approval in February 2017 for recovery of a memorandum account, which tracked incremental drought-related costs incurred in 2015 and 2016 during the drought state of emergency in California. As a result of the CPUC's approval, GSWC recorded a $1.2 million regulatory asset with a corresponding reduction in other operation expenses during the first quarter of 2017. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 there was also a $205,000 increase in surcharges billed to customers, with a corresponding increase in other operation expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings. Excluding the impact of these two items, other operation expenses for the water segment increased by $801,000 due to increases in: (i) labor costs, (ii) annual public water system fees paid to the state of California, and (iii) bad debt expense.
Other operation expenses at the electric segment were lower due primarily to costs incurred in the first quartercommencement of 2016 in response to power outages caused by severe winter storms experienced in January 2016. There were no similar costs incurred during the first nine months of 2017.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, total other operation expenses for the contracted services segment increased mainly due to transition costs incurred at Eglin, including costs for a joint inventory study of Eglin's water system infrastructure conducted with the U.S. government. In accordance with the 50-year contract with the U.S. government, ASUS received revenues to help cover some of the costs of the transition at Eglin. ASUS assumed operations at Eglin in June 2017, which further increased other operation expenses in 2017.Fort Riley on July 1, 2018.
Administrative and General
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, administrative and general expenses by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands): | | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 42,948 |
| | $ | 42,877 |
| | $ | 71 |
| | 0.2 | % | | $ | 25,617 |
| | $ | 26,565 |
| | $ | (948 | ) | | (3.6 | )% |
| Electric Services | | 5,204 |
| | 6,471 |
| | (1,267 | ) | | (19.6 | )% | | 4,155 |
| | 3,761 |
| | 394 |
| | 10.5 | % |
| Contracted Services | | 14,374 |
| | 12,465 |
| | 1,909 |
| | 15.3 | % | | 11,425 |
| | 10,175 |
| | 1,250 |
| | 12.3 | % |
| AWR (parent) | | 8 |
| | 16 |
| | (8 | ) | | (50.0 | )% | | 4 |
| | 5 |
| | (1 | ) | | (20.0 | )% |
| Total administrative and general | | $ | 62,534 |
| | $ | 61,829 |
| | $ | 705 |
| | 1.1 | % | | $ | 41,201 |
| | $ | 40,506 |
| | $ | 695 |
| | 1.7 | % |
DuringFor the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, $2.9 million in surcharges were implemented in 2017 to recover previously incurred administrative and general approved by the CPUC, increasing revenues and water gross margin with a corresponding increase in administrative and general expenses, resulting in no impact to earnings.
Excluding the impact of surcharges, for the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, administrative and general expenses at the water segment decreased by $2.8 million mainly due to lower legala $1.1 million reduction to reflect the CPUC's approval for recovery of previously incurred costs that were being tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts. Excluding this reduction as well as a $352,000 decrease in surcharges billed during the six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the same period of 2018, administrative and general costs at the water segment increased by $525,000 due primarily to higher employee-related compensation and other benefits. As previously discussed, surcharges are recorded in revenue with a corresponding and offsetting amount recorded to administrative and general expenses, having no impact on earnings.
For the six months ended June 30, 2019, administrative and general expenses at the electric segment increased due to costs related to condemnation activities. This decrease was partially offset by increases in labor and employee-related benefits, regulatory expenses and insurance-related costsoutside services as compared to the same period in 2016. Legal and outside services costs tend to fluctuate and are expected to continue to fluctuate.2018.
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017, administrative and general expenses for electric services decreased by $1.3 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2016 due primarily to decreases in: (i) the allocation of general office expenses, (ii) regulatory expenses, and (iii) costs associated with a solar-initiative program approved by the CPUC. The lower allocation of general office expenses has also been reflected in the electric revenue requirement.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,2019, administrative and general expenses for contracted services increased by $1.9$1.3 million as compared to the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20162018 due primarily to an increase in labor and other employee- related benefits, and outside serviceslabor-related costs related to new business development and compliance. Expenses in 2017 were also higher due tofrom the commencement of operations at Eglin in June 2017.
Fort Riley as of July 1, 2018, and a greater allocation of shared services costs pursuant to the final water rate case.
Depreciation and Amortization
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, depreciation and amortization by business segment consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 26,731 |
| | $ | 26,597 |
| | $ | 134 |
| | 0.5 | % | | $ | 14,794 |
| | $ | 17,635 |
| | $ | (2,841 | ) | | (16.1 | )% |
| Electric Services | | 1,610 |
| | 1,520 |
| | 90 |
| | 5.9 | % | | 1,201 |
| | 1,129 |
| | 72 |
| | 6.4 | % |
| Contracted Services | | 843 |
| | 761 |
| | 82 |
| | 10.8 | % | | 1,492 |
| | 912 |
| | 580 |
| | 63.6 | % |
| Total depreciation and amortization | | $ | 29,184 |
| | $ | 28,878 |
| | $ | 306 |
| | 1.1 | % | | $ | 17,487 |
| | $ | 19,676 |
| | $ | (2,189 | ) | | (11.1 | )% |
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, depreciation and amortization expense increasedfor water services decreased due to lower overall composite depreciation rates approved in the water general rate case. The decrease in depreciation expense was partially offset by additions to utility plant. The decrease in composite depreciation rates lowers the water gross margin, and is offset by a corresponding decrease in depreciation expense, resulting in no impact to net earnings. The increase in depreciation for the contracted services segment was due primarily to vehicle and other equipment additions to utility plant, partially offset by retirements recorded during the fourth quarter of 2016 and first nine months of 2017, as well as the sale of the Ojai utility assets in June 2017.fixed assets.
Maintenance
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, maintenance expense by business segment consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 8,111 |
| | $ | 9,954 |
| | $ | (1,843 | ) | | (18.5 | )% | | $ | 3,854 |
| | $ | 5,815 |
| | $ | (1,961 | ) | | (33.7 | )% |
| Electric Services | | 551 |
| | 472 |
| | 79 |
| | 16.7 | % | | 511 |
| | 510 |
| | 1 |
| | 0.2 | % |
| Contracted Services | | 1,630 |
| | 1,482 |
| | 148 |
| | 10.0 | % | | 1,254 |
| | 1,174 |
| | 80 |
| | 6.8 | % |
| Total maintenance | | $ | 10,292 |
| | $ | 11,908 |
| | $ | (1,616 | ) | | (13.6 | )% | | $ | 5,619 |
| | $ | 7,499 |
| | $ | (1,880 | ) | | (25.1 | )% |
Maintenance expense for water services decreased by $1.8 million due to an overalla lower level of planned and unplanned maintenance as compared to the same period in 2017,2018. Maintenance expense at the water segment is expected to increase during the second half of 2019 as well ascompared to the timingfirst half of planned maintenance activities.
2019.
Property and Other Taxes
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, property and other taxes by business segment consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 11,517 |
| | $ | 11,022 |
| | $ | 495 |
| | 4.5 | % | | $ | 8,298 |
| | $ | 7,856 |
| | $ | 442 |
| | 5.6 | % |
| Electric Services | | 799 |
| | 806 |
| | (7 | ) | | (0.9 | )% | | 537 |
| | 534 |
| | 3 |
| | 0.6 | % |
| Contracted Services | | 1,070 |
| | 1,035 |
| | 35 |
| | 3.4 | % | | 931 |
| | 781 |
| | 150 |
| | 19.2 | % |
| Total property and other taxes | | $ | 13,386 |
| | $ | 12,863 |
| | $ | 523 |
| | 4.1 | % | | $ | 9,766 |
| | $ | 9,171 |
| | $ | 595 |
| | 6.5 | % |
Property and other taxes increased overall by $523,000 during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 due primarily to capital additions.
additions and associated higher assessed property values.
ASUS Construction
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, construction expenses for contracted services were $34.6$26.8 million, decreasing $762,000increasing $5.2 million compared to the same period in 2016 largely2018 due to improved cost efficiencies, partially offset by an increase in overall construction activity.
Gain on Sale of Assets
In June 2017, GSWC completedactivity as compared to the sale of its Ojai water system to Casitas for $34.3 million, resultingsame period in a pretax gain of $8.3 million on the sale of assets.
2018.
Interest Expense
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, interest expense by business segment, including AWR (parent) consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 16,092 |
| | $ | 15,821 |
| | $ | 271 |
| | 1.7 | % | | $ | 11,245 |
| | $ | 10,880 |
| | $ | 365 |
| | 3.4 | % |
| Electric Services | | 1,078 |
| | 1,008 |
| | 70 |
| | 6.9 | % | | 754 |
| | 736 |
| | 18 |
| | 2.4 | % |
| Contracted Services | | 228 |
| | 37 |
| | 191 |
| | 516.2 | % | | 289 |
| | 198 |
| | 91 |
| | 46.0 | % |
| AWR (parent) | | 208 |
| | 90 |
| | 118 |
| | 131.1 | % | | 311 |
| | 157 |
| | 154 |
| | 98.1 | % |
| Total interest expense | | $ | 17,606 |
| | $ | 16,956 |
| | $ | 650 |
| | 3.8 | % | | $ | 12,599 |
| | $ | 11,971 |
| | $ | 628 |
| | 5.2 | % |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2017,The overall increase in interest expense increased $650,000is due largely to higher average borrowings as well as higher interest rates on the revolving credit facility as compared to 2018. In March 2019, AWR exercised an option in the first nine months of 2016. The proceeds received in June 2017credit facility to increase its borrowing capacity from the completed sale of GSWC's Ojai system$150.0 million to $200.0 million. Borrowings made during 2019 were used to repay $40.0 million of GSWC's 6.70% senior note, which matured in March 2019, as well as to fund a portion of these borrowings.GSWC's capital expenditures.
Interest Income
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, interest income by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 1,168 |
| | $ | 549 |
| | $ | 619 |
| | 112.8 | % | | $ | 896 |
| | $ | 824 |
| | $ | 72 |
| | 8.7 | % |
| Electric Services | | 7 |
| | 11 |
| | (4 | ) | | (36.4 | )% | | 55 |
| | 13 |
| | 42 |
| | 323.1 | % |
| Contracted Services | | 14 |
| | 8 |
| | 6 |
| | 75.0 | % | | 869 |
| | 335 |
| | 534 |
| | 159.4 | % |
| AWR (parent) | | 11 |
| | — |
| | 11 |
| | — | % | | (2 | ) | | — |
| | (2 | ) | | N/A |
|
| Total interest income | | $ | 1,200 |
| | $ | 568 |
| | $ | 632 |
| | 111.3 | % | | $ | 1,818 |
| | $ | 1,172 |
| | $ | 646 |
| | 55.1 | % |
The increase in interest income isfor contracted services during the six months ended June 30, 2019, was largely due to the collection of certain amounts from developers previously owed to GSWC, as well as an increase in interest income related to regulatory assets.recognized on certain initial construction projects performed at Fort Riley.
Other, net
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, other income increased by $582,000$1.3 million due primarily to higher gains on investments due to recent market conditions, as compared to the same period in 2016.
2018, partially offset by an increase in the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit costs related to Registrant's defined benefit pension plans and other retirement benefits as compared to the same period in 2018. As previously discussed, as a result of GSWC's pension balancing account authorized by the CPUC, changes in net periodic benefit costs are mostly offset by corresponding changes in revenues, having no material impact to earnings.
Income Tax Expense
For the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 and 2016,2018, income tax expense by business segment, including AWR (parent), consisted of the following (dollar amounts in thousands):
| | | | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2017 | | Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2016 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2019 | | Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 | | $ CHANGE | | % CHANGE |
| Water Services | | $ | 27,739 |
| | $ | 23,528 |
| | $ | 4,211 |
| | 17.9 | % | | $ | 8,485 |
| | $ | 5,558 |
| | $ | 2,927 |
| | 52.7 | % |
| Electric Services | | 1,496 |
| | 1,675 |
| | (179 | ) | | (10.7 | )% | | 461 |
| | 771 |
| | (310 | ) | | (40.2 | )% |
| Contracted Services | | 5,152 |
| | 4,029 |
| | 1,123 |
| | 27.9 | % | | 2,425 |
| | 1,259 |
| | 1,166 |
| | 92.6 | % |
| AWR (parent) | | (717 | ) | | (655 | ) | | (62 | ) | | 9.5 | % | | (230 | ) | | (637 | ) | | 407 |
| | (63.9 | )% |
| Total income tax expense | | $ | 33,670 |
| | $ | 28,577 |
| | $ | 5,093 |
| | 17.8 | % | | $ | 11,141 |
| | $ | 6,951 |
| | $ | 4,190 |
| | 60.3 | % |
Consolidated income tax expense for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 increased by approximately $5.1 million due primarily to an increase in pretax income, which included the pretax gain recognized on the sale of GSWC's Ojai water system in June 2017.income. AWR's consolidated ETR was 37.3%increased to 21.9% for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to 37.1%20.4% for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2016.
2018. GSWC's ETR during the six months ended June 30, 2019 was 22.2% as compared to 21.9% for the six months ended June 30, 2018.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Critical accounting policies and estimates are those that are important to the portrayal of AWR’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, and require the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments of AWR’s management. The need to make estimates about the effect of items that are uncertain is what makes these judgments difficult, subjective and/or complex. Management makes subjective judgments about the accounting and regulatory treatment of many items. These judgments are based on AWR’s historical experience, terms of existing contracts, AWR’s observance of trends in the industry, and information available from other outside sources, as appropriate. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
The critical accounting policies used in the preparation of the Registrant’s financial statements that it believes affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements presented in this report are described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018. There have been no material changes to Registrant’s critical accounting policies. Registrant adopted the new lease guidance beginning January 1, 2019 as further described in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
AWR
Registrant’s regulated business is capital intensive and requires considerable capital resources. A portion of these capital resources is provided by internally generated cash flows from operations. AWR anticipates that interest expense will increase due to the need for additional external capital to fund its construction program and increases in market interest rates. AWR believes that costs associated with capital used to fund construction at GSWC will continue to be recovered through water and electric rates charged to customers. AWR funds its operating expenses and pays dividends on its outstanding Common Shares primarily through dividends from its wholly owned subsidiaries. The ability of GSWC to pay dividends to AWR is restricted by California law. Under these restrictions, approximately $234.3$222.2 million was available on SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 to pay dividends to AWR.
The ability of ASUS to pay dividends to AWR is also restricted by California law and by the ability of its subsidiaries to pay dividends to it.
When necessary, Registrant obtains funds from external sources in the capital markets and through bank borrowings. Access to external financing on reasonable terms depends on the credit ratings of AWR and GSWC and current business conditions, including that of the water utility industry in general as well as conditions in the debt or equity capital markets. AWR also has access toborrows under a $150.0 million revolving credit facility, which expires in May 2018. Management expects to extend this facility prior to its expiration date. AWR borrows under this facility2023, and provides funds to its subsidiaries, GSWC and ASUS, in support of their operations. Any amounts owedIn March 2019, AWR amended this credit facility to AWR for borrowings by GSWC under this facility are included in inter-company payables on GSWC’s balance sheet. The interest rate chargedincrease its borrowing capacity from $150.0 million to GSWC and ASUS is sufficient to cover AWR’s interest expense under the credit facility.$200.0 million. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, there were $46.0$185.5 million in borrowings outstanding under this facility and $6.3 million$940,000 of letters of credit outstanding. As of SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, AWR had $97.7$13.6 million available to borrow under the credit facility. GSWC intends to issue up to $115.0 million of long-term debt by the end of 2019 and use the proceeds to reduce its intercompany borrowings and to partially fund capital expenditures. AWR parent intends to use any debt financing proceeds from GSWC to pay down the amounts outstanding under its credit facility.
During the six months ended June 30, 2019, GSWC incurred $70.7 million in company-funded capital expenditures. During 2019, Registrant's company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $115 - $125 million.
In May 2017,April 2019, Standard and Poor’s Global Ratings (“S&P”) reaffirmedaffirmed an A+ credit rating with a stable outlook on both AWR and GSWC. S&P’s debt ratings range from AAA (highest possible) to D (obligation is in default). In December 2016,January 2019, Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's") affirmed its A2 rating with a stablepositive outlook for GSWC. Securities ratings are not recommendations to buy, sell or hold a security, and are subject to change or withdrawal at any time by the rating agency.agencies. Registrant believes that AWR’s sound capital structure and A+ credit rating, combined with its financial discipline, will enable AWR to access the debt and equity markets. However, unpredictable financial market conditions in the future may limit its access or impact the timing of when to access the market, in which case Registrant may choose to temporarily reduce its capital spending. During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, GSWC incurred $79.7 million in company-funded capital expenditures. During 2017, Registrant's company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $110 - $120 million. If needed, GSWC may issue long-term debt depending on market conditions. The proceeds from any debt issuance would be used
AWR’s ability to pay down short-term borrowings and fund a portion of capital expenditures. Furthermore, the proceeds of approximately $34.3 millioncash dividends on its Common Shares outstanding depends primarily upon cash flows from the sale of GSWC's Ojai water system were used to repay a portion of GSWC’s short-term borrowings. Management is evaluating the long-term use of these proceeds.
its subsidiaries. AWR intends to continue paying quarterly cash dividends on or about March 1, June 1, September 1 and December 1, subject to earnings and financial conditions, regulatory requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. Registrant has paid common dividends for over 80 consecutive years. On OctoberJuly 30, 2017,2019, AWR's Board of Directors approved a fourth10.9% increase in the third quarter dividend, of $0.255from $0.275 per share to $0.305 per share on AWR's Common Shares. Dividends on the Common Shares will be payablepaid on December 1, 2017September 3, 2019 to shareholders of record at the close of business on NovemberAugust 15, 2017.
2019.
Registrant's current liabilities may at times exceed its current assets. Management believes that internally generated funds along with borrowings from AWR's credit facility are adequate to provide sufficient capital to maintain normal operations and to meet its capital and financing requirements.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Cash flows from operating activities have generally provided sufficient cash to fund operating requirements, including a portion of construction expenditures at GSWC and construction expenses at ASUS, and to pay dividends. Registrant’s future cash flows from operating activities are expected to be affected by a number of factors, including utility regulation; changes in tax law; maintenance expenses; inflation; compliance with environmental, health and safety standards; production costs; customer growth; per customerper-customer usage of water and electricity; weather and seasonality; conservation efforts; compliance with local governmental requirements, including mandatory restrictions on water use; and required cash contributions to pension and post-retirement plans. Future cash flows from contracted services subsidiaries will depend on new business activities, existing operations, the construction of new and/or replacement infrastructure at military bases, timely economic price and equitable adjustment of prices, and timely collection of payments from the U.S. government and other prime contractors operating at the military bases.
The lower federal tax rate and the elimination of bonus depreciation brought about by 2017's Tax Cuts and Jobs Act ("Tax Act") are expected to reduce Registrant's cash flows from operating activities, and result in higher financing costs arising from an increased need to raise debt and/or equity.
ASUS funds its operating expenses primarily through internal operating sources, which include U.S. government funding under 50-year contracts for operations and maintenance costs and construction activities, as well as investments by, or loans from, AWR. ASUS, in turn, provides funding to its subsidiaries. ASUS's subsidiaries may also from time to time provide funding to ASUS or its subsidiaries.
Cash flows from operating activities are primarily generated by net income, adjusted for non-cash expenses such as depreciation and amortization, and deferred income taxes. Cash generated by operations varies during the year. Net cash provided by operating activities of Registrant was $120.2$44.7 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to $77.5$65.1 million for the same period in 2016.2018. There was an increasea decrease in operating cash flow for GSWCreceipts due to lower water customer usage, the delay in receiving a decision on the water general rate case and the expiration of various CPUC-approved surcharges implemented during 2017related to recover previously incurred costs, as well as federal income tax refunds receivedGSWC’s regulatory accounts. The decrease in 2017. The increasewater customer usage increases the under-collection balance in operating cash flow was also due to the timing of billing of and cash receiptsWRAM regulatory asset, which will be filed in the future for construction work at military bases during the nine months ended September 30, 2017. The billings (and cash receipts) for this construction work generally occur at completion of the work or in accordance with a billing schedule contractually agreed to with the U.S. government and/or other prime contractors. Thus, cash flow from construction-related activities may fluctuate from period to period with such fluctuations representing timing differences of when the work is being performed and when the cash is received for payment of the work.recovery. The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the changeschange in net cash provided by operating activities.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net cash used in investing activities was $44.9$80.9 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to $101.4$58.7 million for the same period in 2016. Cash paid for2018, due to an increase in capital expenditures were partially offset by $34.3 million in cash proceeds generated fromduring the salefirst six months of GSWC's Ojai water system.2019. Registrant invests capital to provide essential services to its regulated customer base, while working with its regulators to have the opportunity to earn a fair rate of return on investment. Registrant’s infrastructure investment plan consists of both infrastructure renewal programs where(where infrastructure is replaced, as needed,needed) and major capital investment projects where(where new water treatment, supply and delivery facilities are constructed.constructed). GSWC may also be required from time to time to relocate existing infrastructure in order to accommodate local infrastructure improvement projects. Projected capital expenditures and other investments are subject to periodic review and revision.
ASUS funds its operating expenses primarily through internal operating sources, which include U.S. government funding under 50-year contracts for operations and maintenance costs and construction activities, as well as investments by, or loans from, AWR. ASUS, in turn, provides funding to its subsidiaries.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Registrant’s financing activities include primarily: (i) the sale proceeds from the issuance of Common Shares and stock option exercises and the repurchase of Common Shares;Shares, (ii) the issuance and repayment of long-term debt and notes payable to banks;banks, and (iii) the payment of dividends on Common Shares. In order to finance new infrastructure, Registrant also receives customer advances (net of refunds) for, and contributions in aid of, construction. Short-term borrowingsBorrowings on Registrant's credit facility are used to fund capital expenditures until long-term financing is arranged.
Net cash provided by financing activities was $30.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to cash used in financing activities was $69.1of $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to net cash provided of $22.3 million forduring the same period in 2016.2018. This decreaseincrease in cash from financing activities was due to the use of the Ojai sale proceeds, as well as cash generated from operating activities, to repay a portion of short-terman increase in borrowings from Registrant's revolving credit facility during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017. Management is evaluating the long-term use2019. The increased borrowings were used to repay $40.0 million of the Ojai proceeds.
GSWC's 6.70% senior note, which matured in March 2019, and to fund a portion of capital expenditures.
GSWC
GSWC funds its operating expenses, payments on its debt, and dividends on its outstanding common shares, and a portion of its construction expenditures through internal sources. Internal sources of cash flow are provided primarily by retention of a portion of earnings from operating activities. Internal cash generation is influenced by factors such as weather patterns, conservation efforts, environmental regulation, litigation, changes in tax law and deferred taxes, changes in supply costs and regulatory decisions affecting GSWC’s ability to recover these supply costs, timing of rate relief, increases in maintenance expenses and capital expenditures, surcharges authorized by the CPUC to enable GSWC to recover expenses previously incurred from customers, and CPUC requirements to refund amounts previously charged to customers.
GSWC may, at times, utilize external sources, including equity investments and short-term borrowings from AWR, and long-term debt to help fund a portion of its construction expenditures. Management is reviewing options to obtain additional financing, which include issuing additional GSWC long-term debt of up to $115.0 million by the end of 2019. GSWC intends to use the proceeds from any additional debt issuances to reduce its intercompany borrowings and to partially fund capital expenditures. AWR parent intends to use any debt financing proceeds from GSWC to pay down the amounts outstanding under its credit facility.
In addition, GSWC receives advances and contributions from customers, home buildershomebuilders and real estate developers to fund construction necessary to extend service to new areas. Advances for construction are generally refundable at a rate of 2.5% in equal annual installments over 40 years. Amounts whichthat are no longer subject to refund are reclassified to contributions in aid of construction. Utility plant funded by advances and contributions is excluded from rate base. Generally, GSWC amortizes contributions in aid of construction at the same composite rate of depreciation for the related property.
Cash generated from operating activities is expected to increase during the second half of 2019 due to new water rates and surcharges implemented on June 8, 2019 as a result of the CPUC final decision on the water general rate case issued in May 2019. In addition, surcharges to recover the rate difference between billed water revenues through June 8, 2019 and final rates authorized by the CPUC, which are retroactive to January 1, 2019, are expected to be filed with the CPUC by August 30, 2019.
In December 2017, the Tax Act was signed into federal law. The provisions of this major tax reform were generally effective January 1, 2018. The most significant provisions of the Tax Act impacting GSWC was the reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% and the elimination of bonus depreciation for regulated utilities. Pursuant to a CPUC directive, the 2018 impact of the Tax Act on the water adopted revenue requirement was tracked in a memorandum account effective January 1, 2018. On July 1, 2018, new lower water rates, which incorporate the new federal income tax rate, were implemented for all water ratemaking areas. As a result of receiving the May 2019 CPUC final decision on the water general rate case, in July 2019 GSWC filed with the CPUC to refund $7.2 million of over-collections recorded in this memorandum account as a one-time surcredit.
As is often the case with public utilities, GSWC’s current liabilities may at times exceed its current assets. Management believes that internally generated funds along with the proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, borrowings from AWR and common shareCommon Share issuances to AWR will be adequate to provide sufficient capital to enable GSWC to maintain normal operations and to meet its capital and financing requirements pending recovery of costs in rates.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net cash provided by operating activities was $98.4$38.2 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to $76.2$60.6 million for the same period in 2016.2018. There was an increasea decrease in operating cash flow for GSWCreceipts due to lower water customer usage, the delay in receiving a decision on the water general rate case and the expiration of various CPUC-approved surcharges implemented during 2017related to recover previously incurred costs, as well as federal income tax refunds receivedGSWC’s regulatory accounts. The decrease in 2017.water customer usage increases the under-collection balance in the WRAM regulatory asset, which will be filed in the future for recovery. The timing of cash receipts and disbursements related to other working capital items also affected the change in net cash provided by operating activities.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Net cash used in investing activities was $43.3$76.4 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20172019 as compared to $99.6$53.4 million for the same period in 2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, cash2018. Cash used for capital expenditures was $76.4$76.7 million which was partially offset by cash proceeds received fromfor the sale of GSWC's Ojai water system.six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to $53.5 million during the same period in 2018. During 2017,2019, GSWC's company-funded capital expenditures are estimated to be approximately $110$115 - $120$125 million.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Net cash used in financing activities was $49.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 as compared to net cash provided by financing activities was $34.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to cash used of $23.2$4.3 million for the same period in 2016. This decrease2018. The increase in cash from financing activities was due to an increase in intercompany borrowings during the use of the Ojai sale proceeds, as well as cash generated from operating activities,six months ended June 30, 2019 used to repay $40.0 million of GSWC's 6.70% senior note, which matured in March 2019, and to fund a portion of inter-company short-term borrowings during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.GSWC's capital expenditures.
Contractual Obligations and Other Commitments
Registrant has various contractual obligations, which are recorded as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements. Other items, such as certain purchase commitments, and operating leases are not recognized as liabilities in the consolidated financial statements but are required to be disclosed.
In addition to contractual maturities, Registrant has certain debt instruments that contain an annual sinking fund or other principal payments. Registrant believes that it will be able to refinance debt instruments at their maturity through public issuance, or private placement, of debt or equity. Annual payments to service debt are generally made from cash flows from operations.
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Contractual Obligations, Commitments and Off BalanceOff-Balance Sheet Arrangements” section of the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20162018 for a detailed discussion of contractual obligations and other commitments. In March 2019, GSWC repaid $40 million of its 6.70% senior note. Effective January 1, 2019, Registrant adopted the new lease standard as further described in Note 10 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Contracted Services
Under the terms of the current and futureits utility privatization contracts with the U.S. government, each contract's price is subject to an economic price adjustment (“EPA”) on an annual basis. In the event that ASUS (i) is managing more assets at specific military bases than were included in the U.S. government’s request for proposal, (ii) is managing assets that are in substandard condition as compared to what was disclosed in the request for proposal, (iii) prudently incurs costs not contemplated under the terms of the utility privatization contract, and/or (iv) becomes subject to new regulatory requirements, such as more stringent water-quality standards, ASUS is permitted to file, and has filed, requests for equitable adjustment (“REAs”REA”). The timely filing for and receipt of EPAs and/or REAs continues to be critical in order for the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries to recover increasing costs of operating and maintaining, and renewing and replacing the water and/or wastewater systems at the military bases it serves.
Under the Budget Control Act of 2011 (the “Act”“2011 Act”), substantial automatic spending cuts, known as "sequestration," have impacted the expected levels of Department of Defense budgeting. The Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries have not experienced any earnings impact to their existing operations and maintenance and renewal and replacement services, as utility privatization contracts are an "excepted service" within the 2011 Act. While the ongoing effects of sequestration have been mitigated through the passage of a continuing resolution for the fiscal year 20182019 Department of Defense budget, similar issues may arise as part of fiscal uncertainty and/or future debt-ceiling limits imposed by Congress. However, any future impact on ASUS and its operations through the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries will likely be limited to (a) the timing of funding to pay for services rendered, (b) delays in the processing of EPAs and/or REAs, (c) the timing of the issuance of contract modifications for new construction work not already funded by the U.S. government, and/or (d) delays in the solicitation for and/or awarding of new contracts under the Department of Defense utility privatization program.
At times, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (“DCAA”) and/or the Defense Contract Management Agency (“DCMA”) may, at the request of a contracting officer, perform audits/reviews of contractors for compliance with certain government guidance and regulations, such as the Federal Acquisition Regulations and Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplements. Certain audit/review findings, such as system deficiencies for government-contract-business-system requirements, may result in delays in the timing of resolution of filings submitted to and/or the ability to file new proposals with the U.S. government.
Below is a summary of price redetermination, EPA and REA filings and other matters for the Military Utility Privatization Subsidiaries.
FBWS - The EPA for Fort Bliss for the contract year beginning October 1, 2017 was submitted to the government in the third quarter of 2017.
TUS - The EPA filing for Andrews Air Force Base, covering the period February 2017 through January 2018, was approved by the government in the third quarter of 2017 and provides for an annualized inflationary increase in operations and maintenance (“O&M”) and renewal and replacement (“R&R”) fees.
ODUS - The EPA filing for the Fort Lee privatization contract in Virginia, covering the one-year period beginning February 2017, and the EPA for the other bases that ODUS operates in Virginia, covering the one-year period beginning April 2017 were approved by the government in the third quarter of 2017. Both filings provide for an annualized inflationary increase in O&M and R&R fees.
PSUS - The EPA filing for Fort Jackson for the one-year period beginning February 2017 was approved by the government in the first quarter of 2017 and provides for an annualized increase in both O&M and R&R fees.
ONUS - The third price redetermination with a conversion to an EPA filing mechanism for Fort Bragg, covering the period March 2016 through February 2017, together with an EPA filing for the one-year period beginning March 2017, was approved in the second quarter of 2017. A modification implementing the settlement is expected in the fourth quarter of 2017.
ECUS - ASUS assumed the operation of the water and wastewater systems at Eglin Air Force Base as of June 15, 2017. The value of this contract is approximately $702 million over its 50-year term.
New Privatization Contract Award
On September 29, 2017, ASUS was awarded a new 50-year contract by the U.S. government to operate, maintain, and provide construction management services for the water distribution and wastewater collection and treatment facilities at Fort Riley, a United States Army installation located in Kansas. The initial value of the contract is approximately $601 million over the 50-year period and is subject to annual economic price adjustments. This initial value is also subject to adjustment based on the results of a joint inventory of assets to be performed during the transition period. ASUS will assume operations at Fort Riley following the completion of a six-to-twelve-month transition period currently underway.
Regulatory Matters
Cost of Capital Proceeding for Water Regions
In early April 2017, GSWC filed its water cost of capital application with the CPUC. The application filed with the CPUC recommends an overall weighted return on rate base of 9.11%, including an updated cost of debt of 6.6% and a return on equity ("ROE") of 11%. The current authorized return on rate base is 8.34%, including an ROE of 9.43%. A decision on the application is scheduled to be received by the end of 2017 and to become effective January 1, 2018.
Water General Rate Case and Changes in Rates for 2016 and 2017Filings:
In December 2016, the CPUC issued a decision in the water general rate case for GSWC. The 2016 rates approved by the CPUC in the decision were retroactive to January 1, 2016. However, because of the delay in issuing a decision, the CPUC ordered GSWC to bypass implementing 2016 rates and to implement 2017 rates after the correction of minor rate calculations in the December 2016 decision. The CPUC completed the corrections and subsequently issued a final decision in March 2017. The new 2017 rates are effective retroactive to January 1, 2017 and were implemented in April 2017. In July 2017, GSWC filed with the CPUC for recovery of $9.9 million in revenue shortfall, representing the net differences between the actual rates billed from January 2016 through April 2017 and the new rates adopted in the final decision. In September 2017, GSWC implemented surcharges to recover this revenue shortfall over a 12- to 36-month amortization period.
Pending General Rate Case FilingsWater Segment:
In July 2017, GSWC filed a general rate case application for all of its water regions and the general office. This general rate case willoffice to determine new water rates for the years 2019 2020 and- 2021. On May 30, 2019, the CPUC issued a final decision on GSWC's water general rate case with rates retroactive to January 1, 2019. Among other things, GSWC's requested capital budgetsthe final decision approves in this application averageits entirety an August 2018 settlement agreement that had been entered into between GSWC and the CPUC’s Public Advocates Office. As a result, the final decision authorizes GSWC to invest approximately $125$334.5 million per year forover the three-year rate cycle. AThe $334.5 million of infrastructure investment includes $20.4 million of capital projects to be filed for revenue recovery through advice letters when those projects are completed.
Excluding the advice letter project revenues, the new rates approved will increase the water gross margin for 2019 by approximately $7.1 million, adjusted for updated inflation index values since the August 2018 settlement, as compared to the 2018 adopted water gross margin. The 2019 water revenue requirement has been reduced to reflect a decrease of approximately $7.0 million in depreciation expense, compared to the adopted 2018 depreciation expense, due to a reduction in the overall composite depreciation rates based on a revised study filed in the general rate case. The decrease in depreciation expense lowers the water gross margin, and is offset by a corresponding decrease in depreciation expense, resulting in no impact to net earnings. In addition, the 2019 water revenue requirement includes a decrease of approximately $2.2 million for excess deferred tax refunds as a result of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, with a corresponding decrease in income tax expense resulting in no impact to net earnings. Had depreciation expense remained the same as the 2018 adopted amount and there were no excess deferred tax refunds that lowered the 2019 revenue requirement, the water gross margin for 2019 would have increased by approximately $16.3 million.
As result of the May 2019 CPUC final decision, GSWC implemented new water rates on June 8, 2019. The new rates are retroactive to January 1, 2019. Due to the delay in receiving a final decision by the CPUC, billed water revenues up to June 8, 2019 were based on 2018 adopted rates. Because the new rates are retroactive to January 1, 2019, the cumulative retroactive impact of the CPUC decision was recorded during the second quarter of 2019. The final decision also approved the recovery of previously incurred costs that were being tracked in CPUC-authorized memorandum accounts. Surcharges to recover the rate difference between billed water revenues through June 8, 2019, and final rates authorized by the CPUC, retroactive to January 1, 2019, are expected to be filed with the CPUC by August 30, 2019.
In December 2017, the Tax Act was signed into federal law and was generally effective January 1, 2018. The most significant provisions of the Tax Act impacting GSWC was the reduction of the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to
21% and the elimination of bonus depreciation for regulated utilities. Pursuant to a CPUC directive, the 2018 impact of the Tax Act on the water adopted revenue requirement was tracked in a memorandum account effective January 1, 2018. On July 1, 2018, new lower water rates, which incorporate the new federal income tax rate, were implemented for all water ratemaking areas. As a result of receiving the May 2019 CPUC final decision on the water general rate case, is scheduledin July 2019 GSWC filed with the CPUC to refund $7.2 million of over-collections recorded in this memorandum account.
The final decision also allows for potential additional water revenue increases in 2020 and 2021 of approximately $9.6 million and $12.0 million, respectively, subject to the fourth quarterresults of 2018 with new ratesan earnings test and changes to become effective January 1, 2019.the forecasted inflationary index values.
OnElectric Segment:
In May 1, 2017, GSWC filed its electric general rate case application with the CPUC. This general rate case willCPUC to determine new electric rates for the years 2018 through 2021. A finalIn November 2018, GSWC and the Public Advocates Office filed a joint motion to adopt a settlement agreement between the two parties resolving all issues in connection with the general rate case.
On July 16, 2019, the assigned Administrative Law Judge issued a proposed decision ("PD") on the electric general rate case. The PD approves the settlement agreement in its entirety. Among other things, the settlement incorporates a previous stipulation in the case, which authorizes a new return on equity for GSWC's electric segment of 9.60%, as compared to its previously authorized return of 9.95%. The stipulation also included a capital structure and debt cost consistent with those approved by the CPUC in March 2018 in connection with GSWC's water segment cost of capital proceeding. Furthermore, the settlement (i) extends the rate cycle by one year (new rates will be effective for 2018-2022); (ii) increases the electric gross margin for 2018 by approximately $2.0 million compared to the 2017 adopted electric gross margin, adjusted for tax reform; (iii) authorizes BVES to construct all the capital projects requested in its application and provides additional funding for the fifth year added to the rate cycle, which total approximately $44 million of capital projects over the 5-year rate cycle; and (iv) increases the adopted electric gross margin by $1.2 million for each of the years 2019 and 2020, by $1.1 million in 2021, and by $1.0 million in 2022. The rate increases for 2019 – 2022 are not subject to an earnings test.
Because of the delay in finalizing the electric general rate case, is expectedbilled electric revenues during 2018 and the first six months of 2019 were based on 2017 adopted rates, pending a final decision by the CPUC in this rate case application. Had the new rates in the settlement agreement been in place as of January 1, 2018, withpretax income for the electric segment would have increased by approximately $2.0 million, or $0.04 per share, for the full year ended December 31, 2018, and by approximately $1.7 million, or approximately $0.03 per share, for the first six months of 2019. When approved, the new rates effectivewill be retroactive to January 1, 2018. A final decision is expected during the third or fourth quarter of 2019.
Application to Transfer Electric Utility Operations to New Subsidiary:
Other Regulatory Matters
Formal Complaint FiledGSWC filed applications with the CPUC
and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission in December 2018 and July 2019, respectively, to transfer the assets and liabilities of the BVES division of GSWC to Bear Valley Electric Service, Inc., a newly created separate legal entity and stand-alone subsidiary of AWR. Due to the differences in operations, regulations, and risks, management believes a separate electric legal entity and stand-alone subsidiary of AWR is in the best interests of customers, employees, and the communities served. This reorganization plan is subject to regulatory approvals and, if approved, is not expected to result in a substantive change to AWR's operations and business segments. In June 2016, a third partyFebruary 2019, the City of Big Bear Lake filed a formal complaintprotest to the application. GSWC has filed reply comments with the CPUC. The CPUC against GSWC abouthas scheduled to issue a water main break that occurred in 2014 causing damage to a commercial building. Repairs tofinal decision on this matter by the building have been delayed for a varietyend of reasons, including a dispute and litigation between two2019.
California Assembly Bill No. 1054
On July 12, 2019, the Governor of GSWC's insurance carriers regarding their respective coverage obligations, as well as questions as toCalifornia signed Assembly Bill No. 1054 (“AB 1054”), the nature and extentprovisions of the building’s damage and the costs associated therewith. The complaint filed with the CPUC requests, amongwhich took effect immediately. Among other things, thatAB 1054 provides a framework for electrical corporations to recover costs and expenses arising from a covered wildfire, as defined, and to allow cost recovery from ratepayers in particular circumstances. The bill also establishes a Wildfire Fund to pay eligible claims arising from a covered wildfire under certain circumstances. The Wildfire Fund is expected to be funded partially by electrical corporation shareholders, and partly by ratepayers. If the CPUC investigate the main break, the damageCompany decides to the commercial building and the delay of its repairs, and order GSWC to complete repairs immediately. In September 2017, the CPUC dismissed the complaint on the grounds that the CPUC lacks jurisdiction to impose monetary damages for injuries to property, as requested by the third party, and the third party lacks standing with respect to the property as it is not the owner of the damaged property.
Previously, the owners of the commercial building filed suit in Ventura County Superior Court against GSWC for damages to the building. On September 11, 2017, the Ventura County Superior Court issued a statement of decision in favor of the plaintiffs, and awarded damages to the plaintiffsparticipate in the amount of $2.6 million. In October 2017, the Court held a hearing and also awarded the plaintiffs attorneys’ fees in the amount of approximately $895,000. GSWC believesWildfire Fund, it has sufficient insurance coverageuntil September 10, 2019 to covermake the judgment and attorney fees totaling $3.5 million entered by the Court in this lawsuit. However, GSWC cannot predict the final outcome of the dispute and litigation between its insurers.initial contribution. At this time, GSWC doesa decision has not believe the final outcome will materially affect GSWC's consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.been made.
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Regulatory Matters” section of the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 20162018 for a detailed discussion of other regulatory matters.
Environmental Matters
AWR’s subsidiaries are subject to stringent environmental regulations, including the 1996 amendments to the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act.
GSWC is required to comply with the safe drinking water standards established by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“US EPA”) and the Division of Drinking Water ("DDW"), under the State Water Resources Control Board (“SWRCB”). The US EPA regulates contaminants that may have adverse health effects that are known or likely to occur at levels of public health concern, and the regulation of which will provide a meaningful opportunity for health risk reduction. The DDW, acting on behalf of the US EPA, administers the US EPA’s program in California. Similar state agencies administer these rules in the other states in which Registrant operates.
GSWC currently tests its water supplies and water systems according to, among other things, pursuant to requirements listed in the Federal Safe Drinking Water Act (“SDWA”). In compliance with the SDWA and to assure a safe drinking water supply to its customers, GSWC has incurred operating costs for testing to determine the levels, if any, of the constituents in its sources of supply and additional expense to treat contaminants in order to meet the federal and state maximum contaminant level standards and consumer demands. GSWC expects to incur additional capital costs as well as increased operating costs to maintain or improve the quality of water delivered to its customers in light of anticipated stress on water resources associated with watershed and aquifer pollution, as well as to meet future water quality standards. The CPUC ratemaking process provides GSWC with the opportunity to recover prudently incurred capital and operating costs in future filings associated with achieving water quality standards. Management believes that such incurred and expected future costs shouldwill be authorized for recovery by the CPUC.
Drinking Water Notifications Levels:
In July 2018, DDW issued drinking water notification levels for certain fluorinated organic chemicals used to make certain fabrics and other materials, and used in various industrial processes. These chemicals are referred to as perfluoroalkyl substances (e.g., PFOA and PFOS). Notification levels are non-regulatory, health-based advisory levels established for contaminants in drinking water for which maximum contaminant levels have not been established. The US EPA has also established health advisory levels for these compounds. Notification to consumers is required when the advisory levels or notification levels are exceeded. GSWC is in the process of collecting and analyzing samples for perfluoroalkyl substances from certain groundwater wells identified by DDW. The final results of the sampling is anticipated to be available by third quarter of 2019.
Lead Testing in Schools:
In January 2017, the California State Water Resources Control Board - Division of Drinking Water (DDW) issued a permit amendment that required all community water systems to test the schools in their service area for lead, if sampling is requested in writing by the institution’s officials. In addition, California Assembly passed a bill (AB-746) in October 2017, which required all community water systems that serve a school site of a local educational agency with a building constructed before January 1, 2010, to test for lead in the potable water system of the school site on or before July 1, 2019. GSWC has been working extensively with the schools in its service areas for the last several months. As a result of concerted outreach to the schools, GSWC has completed lead sampling at all schools in its service area as of June 30, 2019, with the exception of one school district in the Bell-Bell Gardens system. DDW has been notified regarding the lack of response from this school district.
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Environmental Matters” section of the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 20162018 for a discussion of environmental matters applicable to GSWC and ASUS and its subsidiaries.
Water Supply
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—California Drought” section of the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year-ended December 31, 20162018 for a detailed discussion of water supply issues. The discussion below focuses on significant matters and changes since December 31, 2016.2018.
California Drought Impact:
In April 2017,May 2018, the Governor of California ended the drought state of emergency in most of California in response to significantly improved water supply conditions resulting from substantial rainfall and snowpack in late 2016 and 2017. On the same date, the SWRCB and related state agencies released a plan to establishLegislature passed two bills that provide a framework for long-term waterwater-use efficiency standards.standards and drought planning and resiliency. The plan includes continued bans on wasteful practicesinitial steps for implementing this legislation have been laid out in a summary document by the California Department of Water Resources ("DWR") and outlines the SWRCB’s vision for continued
implementation of the Governor’s executive order on water conservation. Both the SWRCB and State Legislature are expected to act on the Governor’s executive order inWater Resources Control Board ("SWRCB"). Over the next year.
The SWRCB had taken various actions to help ensure reducedseveral years, State agencies, water usage throughout the State during a drought emergency declaration,suppliers and to track reductions by larger urban water suppliers. GSWC filed appropriate drought contingency plans, or Staged Mandatory Water Conservation and Rationing Plans, with the CPUCother entities will be working to meet the SWRCB requirements.requirements and timeliness of plan implementation. A notable milestone is the establishment of an indoor water use standard of 55 gallons per capita per day (gpcd) until 2025, at which time the standard may be reduced to 52.5 gpcd or a new standard as recommend by DWR.
California's recent period of multi-year drought resulted in reduced recharge to the state's groundwater basins. GSWC utilizes groundwater from numerous groundwater basins throughout the state. Several of these basins, especially smaller basins,
experienced lower groundwater levels because of the drought. Several of GSWC's service areas rely on groundwater as their only source of supply. Given the critical nature of the groundwater levels in theCalifornia’s Central Coast area, GSWC implemented mandatory water restrictions in certain service areas, moving to higher stages of the Staged Mandatory Water Conservation and Rationing Plan for those areas.in accordance with CPUC procedures. In the event of water supply shortages beyond the mandated reductions,locally available supply, GSWC would need to transport additional water from other areas, increasing the cost of water supply. GSWC
The 2017-2018 water year was a dry year, with rainfall in northern California being below normal levels. However, precipitation to date in 2019 has ended implementationbeen above normal levels, with northern Sierra snowpack at 165% of the Staged Mandatory Water Conservation and Rationing Plan in all of its service areas.
average. As of October 31, 2017,July 30, 2019, the U.S. Drought Monitor estimated zerothat 4 percent of California ranks “Abnormally Dry” with no parts of the State ranked in “Drought.” This is in comparison to July 2018 when approximately 86 percent of the State was considered “Abnormally Dry,” and 45 percent was in the rank of “Severe Drought” and approximately 8 percent continued in the rank of “Moderate Drought,” which is a significant improvement from October 2016 when approximately 62 percent of California was ranked “SevereModerate Drought.”
Metropolitan Water District/ State Water Project:
GSWC supplements groundwater production with wholesale purchases from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California ("MWD") member agencies. Water supplies available to the MWD through the State Water Project ("SWP") vary from year to year based on several factors. Every year, the California Department of Water Resources ("DWR") establishes the SWP allocation for water deliveries to state water contractors. DWR generally establishes a percentage allocation of delivery requests based on a number ofseveral factors, including weather patterns, snow-pack levels, reservoir levels and biological diversion restrictions. The SWP is a major source of water for the MWD. In April 2017, theFebruary 2019, DWR set an initial SWP delivery allocation was increased to 85at 35 percent of requested orders as a result of improved hydrologic conditions in Northern California.requests for the 2019 calendar year. However, DWR increased the allocation to 70 percent on March 20, 2019 due to higher than normal precipitation and snow pack.
New Accounting Pronouncements
Registrant is subject to newly issued requirements as well as changes in existing requirements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Differences in financial reporting between periods for GSWC could occur unless and until the CPUC approves such changes for conformity through regulatory proceedings. See Note 1 of the Unaudited Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Registrant is exposed to certain market risks, including fluctuations in interest rates, commodity price risk, primarily relating to changes in the market price of electricity at BVES,GSWC's electric division, and other economic conditions. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in prevailing market rates and prices.
The quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk are discussed in Item 7A-Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk, contained in Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.2018.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we have carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness, as of the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this report, of the design and operation of our “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated by the SEC under the Exchange Act. Based upon that evaluation, the CEO and the CFO concluded that disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of such fiscal quarter, were adequate and effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 2017,2019, that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In December 2014, the City of Claremont, California (“Claremont”) filed an eminent-domain action against GSWC to condemn GSWC's Claremont water system. In December 2016, the County of Los Angeles Superior Court (the “Court”) issued a decision rejecting Claremont’s attempt to take over GSWC’s Claremont water system. In February 2017, the Court further ordered that GSWC is entitled to recover $7.6 million (“Judgment Amount”) of its litigation expenses and related defense costs from Claremont. During the first quarter of 2017, Claremont appealed both decisions.
In October 2017, GSWC and Claremont entered into a settlement agreement whereby Claremont agreed to drop its appeals and to pay $2.0 million on or before December 31, 2017 to GSWC as partial satisfaction of the Judgment Amount plus interest accrued through the end of 2017. Upon receipt of the $2.0 million, which is expected during the fourth quarter of 2017 pursuant to the settlement agreement, GSWC will reflect this $2.0 million payment as a reduction to operating expenses. Furthermore, quarterly interest-only payments calculated on the unpaid Judgment Amount of $5.9 million are to be made by Claremont to GSWC over the next 12 years. If Claremont (i) makes its initial payment of $2.0 million and all of the quarterly payments as required, and (ii) does not take formal action to condemn GSWC's Claremont water system before December 31, 2029, GSWC will waive payment of the unpaid Judgment Amount. However, if Claremont were to take formal action within the next 12 years or miss any of the required payments specified in the settlement agreement, the unpaid Judgment Amount and any unpaid accrued interest would immediately become due and payable. At this time, GSWC is unable to predict the actions that Claremont will take over the next 12 years. GSWC serves approximately 11,000 customers in Claremont.
Registrant is subject to ordinary routine litigation incidental to its business, some of which may include claims for compensatory and punitive damages. Other than those disclosed in this Form 10-Q and in Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, no otherNo legal proceedings are pending, which are believed to be material. Management believes that rate recovery, proper insurance coverage and reserves are in place to insure against, among other things, property, general liability, employment, and workers’ compensation claims incurred in the ordinary course of business. Insurance coverage may not cover certain claims involving punitive damages.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There have been no significant changes in the risk factors disclosed in our 20162018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The shareholders of AWR have approved the material features of all equity compensation plans under which AWR directly issues equity securities. The following table provides information about repurchases of Common Shares by AWR during the thirdsecond quarter of 20172019: |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1) | | Maximum Number
of Shares That May
Yet Be Purchased
under the Plans or
Programs (3) |
| July 1 – 31, 2017 | | 14,118 |
| | $ | 47.17 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| August 1 – 31, 2017 | | 53,172 |
| | $ | 49.52 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| September 1 – 30, 2017 | | 43,027 |
| | $ | 49.09 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | | 110,317 |
| (2) | $ | 49.05 |
| | — |
| | |
|
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | Average Price Paid per Share | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1) | | Maximum Number
of Shares That May
Yet Be Purchased
under the Plans or
Programs (1)(3) |
| April 1 – 30, 2019 | | 12,450 |
| | $ | 70.18 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| May 1 – 31, 2019 | | 447 |
| | $ | 72.88 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| June 1 – 30, 2019 | | 13,595 |
| | $ | 73.57 |
| | — |
| | — |
|
| Total | | 26,492 |
| (2) | $ | 71.96 |
| | — |
| | |
(1) None of the common shares were purchased pursuant to any publicly announced stock repurchase program.
(2)Of this amount, 103,22522,226 Common Shares were acquired on the open market for employees pursuant to the Company's 401(k) plan and the remainder was acquired on the open market for participants in the Common Share Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan.
(3) Neither the 401(k) plan nor the Common Share Purchase and Dividend Reinvestment Plan contain a maximum number of common shares that may be purchased in the open market.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosure
Not applicable
Item 5. Other Information
(a) On October 30, 2017, AWR's Board of Directors approved a fourth quarter dividend of $0.255 per share on AWR's Common Shares. Dividends on the Common Shares will be payable on December 1, 2017 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 15, 2017.
| |
| (a) | On July 30, 2019, AWR's Board of Directors approved a third quarter dividend of $0.305 per share on AWR's Common Shares. Dividends on the Common Shares will be paid on September 3, 2019 to shareholders of record at the close of business on August 15, 2019. |
| |
| (b) | There have been no material changes during the second quarter of 2019 to the procedures by which shareholders may nominate persons to the Board of Directors of AWR. |
(b) There have been no material changes during the third quarter of 2017 to the procedures by which shareholders may nominate persons to the Board of Directors of AWR.
Item 6. Exhibits
(a) The following documents are filed as Exhibits to this report:
|
| | |
| 3.1 | | |
| | | |
| 3.2 | | |
| | | |
| 3.3 | | |
| | | |
| 3.4 | | |
| | | |
| 4.1 | | |
| | | |
| 4.2 | | |
| | |
4.3 | | |
| | |
4.4 | | |
| | | |
| 10.1 | | Second Sublease dated October 5, 1984 between Golden State Water Company and Three Valleys Municipal Water District incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-2, Registration No. 33-5151 |
| | | |
| 10.2 | | Note Agreement dated as of May 15, 1991 between Golden State Water Company and Transamerica Occidental Life Insurance Company incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Form 10-Q with respect to the quarter ended June 30, 1991 (File No. 1-14431) |
| | | |
| 10.3 | | Schedule of omitted Note Agreements, dated May 15, 1991, between Golden State Water Company and Transamerica Annuity Life Insurance Company, and Golden State Water Company and First Colony Life Insurance Company incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Form 10-Q with respect to the quarter ended June 30, 1991 (File No. 1-14431) |
| | | |
| 10.4 | | |
| | | |
| 10.5 | | Agreement for Financing Capital Improvement dated as of June 2, 1992 between Golden State Water Company and Three Valleys Municipal Water District incorporated herein by reference to Registrant's Form 10-K with respect to the year ended December 31, 1992 (File No. 1-14431) |
| | | |
| 10.6 | | |
| | | |
| 10.7 | | |
| | | |
| 10.8 | | |
| | | |
| 10.9 | | |
| | | |
| 10.10 | | |
| | |
| | | |
| 10.11 | | |
|
| | |
| | |
10.12 | | |
| | | |
10.1310.12 | | |
| | | |
10.1410.13 | | |
| | |
10.15 | | |
| | |
10.16 | | |
| | |
10.17 | | |
| | |
10.18 | | |
|
| | |
| | | |
10.1910.14 | | |
| | | |
10.2010.15 | | |
| | | |
10.2110.16 | | |
| | | |
10.2210.17 | | |
| | | |
10.2310.18 | | |
| | | |
10.2410.19 | | |
| | | |
10.2510.20 | | |
| | | |
10.2610.21 | | |
| | | |
10.2710.22 | | |
| | | |
10.2810.23 | | |
| | | |
10.2910.24 | | |
| | |
10.30 | | |
| | | |
10.3110.25 | | |
| | | |
10.3210.26 | | |
| | |
10.33 | | |
| | |
|
| | |
10.34 | | |
| | |
10.35 | | |
| | | |
10.3610.27 | | |
| | | |
10.3710.28 | | |
| | |
| 10.29 | | |
| | |
| 10.30 | | |
| | |
| 10.31 | | |
| | | |
10.3810.32 | | |
| | |
10.39 | | |
| | | |
| 31.1 | | |
| | | |
| 31.1.1 | | |
| | | |
| 31.2 | | |
| | | |
| 31.2.1 | | |
| | | |
| 32.1 | | |
| | | |
|
| | |
| 32.2 | | |
| | | |
| 101.INS | | XBRL Instance Document (3)- the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document. |
| | | |
| 101.SCH | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema (3) |
| | | |
| 101.CAL | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase (3) |
| | | |
| 101.DEF | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase (3) |
| | | |
| 101.LAB | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase (3) |
| | | |
| 101.PRE | | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase (3) |
| | |
(1)Filed concurrently herewith
(2)Management contract or compensatory arrangement
(3)Furnished concurrently herewith
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized and as its principal financial officer.
|
| | | |
| | | | AMERICAN STATES WATER COMPANY (“AWR”): |
| | | | |
| | | By: | /s/ EVA G. TANG |
| | | | Eva G. Tang |
| | | | Senior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial |
| | | | Officer, Corporate Secretary and Treasurer |
| | | | |
| | | | GOLDEN STATE WATER COMPANY (“GSWC”): |
| | | | |
| | | By: | /s/ EVA G. TANG |
| | | | Eva G. Tang |
| | | | Senior Vice President-Finance, Chief Financial |
| | | | Officer and Secretary |
| | | | |
| | | Date: | November 6, 2017August 5, 2019 |