UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

[X] X ]  QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period endedMarch 31,June 30, 2015

[  ]  TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from  _______________ to _____________________________to __________________

000-21777

(Commission File Number)

GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

British Columbia, CanadaNot Applicable
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification) No.)

2300 1066 West Hastings Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
V6E 3X2 Canada
(Address of principal executive offices)

Issuer’s telephone number, including area code:(778) 373-1557

Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report:N/A

Check whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes  [X]  No  [  ]

Check whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes  [X]  No  [  ]

Check whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer  [  ]  Accelerated filer  [X]  Non-accelerated filer  [  ]  Smaller reporting company  [  ]

Check whether the registrant is a shell company, as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Yes  [  ]  No  [X]

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date:
As of May 11,August 10, 2015the registrant’s outstandingoutstanding common stock consisted of 99,928,683 shares.


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
March 31,June 30, 2015

(US Dollars)

2


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Balance Sheets
(Unaudited - US dollars)

 March 31,  December 31,  June 30,  December 31, 
 2015  2014  2015  2014 
Assets            
Current assets:            
Cash (Note 7(i))$ 69,083,604 $ 91,407,644 
Cash (Note 7 (vii))$ 85,721,947 $ 91,407,644 
Receivables 34,501  52,136  31,729  52,136 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets 257,742  114,625  1,143,721`  114,625 
            
Total current assets 69,375,847  91,574,405  86,897,397  91,574,405 
Property (Note 2) 243,767  251,467  236,440  251,467 
Mineral property interests (Note 3) 61,353,090  37,138,134  82,330,623  37,138,134 
Reclamation financial assurance (Note 5) 553,343  553,329  902,382  553,329 
Total Assets$ 131,526,047 $ 129,517,335  170,366,842  129,517,335 
            
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity            
Current liabilities:            
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 7(i))$ 5,866,495 $ 3,309,476 $ 8,468,313 $ 3,309,476 
Interest payable (Note 7(ii) and (iii)) 415,892  320,721  374,545  320,721 
Closing fee payable (Note 7(iii)) -  250,000  -  250,000 
Notes payable (Note 7(iii)) 11,918,034  13,881,305  -  13,881,305 
Current portion of loan payable (Note 10) 931,828  222,839  1,347,120  222,839 
Derivative liability–convertible debenture (Note 7(ii)) 1,931,519  1,829,770  12,414  1,829,770 
Convertible debenture (Note 7(ii)) 6,823,493  6,649,967  7,749,036  6,649,967 
            
Total current liabilities 27,887,261  26,464,078  17,951,428  26,464,078 
Notes payable (Note 7 (iii)) 33,640,346  - 
Derivative liability – warrants (Note 7(iv)) 3,352,979  - 
Asset retirement obligations (Note 5) 624,142  624,142  902,382  624,142 
Loan payable (Note 10) 2,847,287  690,293  3,943,982  690,293 
            
Total Liabilities 31,358,690  27,778,513  59,791,117  27,778,513 
Temporary Equity            
Redeemable portion of non-controlling interest (Note 7(vi)) 22,718,963  22,833,645 
Redeemable portion of non-controlling interest (Note 7(vii)) 27,434,016  22,833,645 
Shareholders’ Equity            
Common shares, no par value, unlimited shares
authorized99,928,683 (2014 – 99,778,683) shares issued and
outstanding (Notes 4 and 7(i))
 62,860,443  62,709,015 
Additional paid-in capital (Note 7(vi)) 56,390,510  56,390,510 
Common shares, no par value, unlimited shares authorized 99,928,683 (2014 – 99,778,683) shares issued and outstanding (Notes 4 and 7(i)) 62,860,443  62,709,015 
Additional paid-in capital (Note 7(vii)) 56,390,510  56,390,510 
Deficit accumulated (75,881,003) (74,444,816) (77,260,267) (74,444,816)
            
Total shareholders’ equity attributable to GQM Ltd. 43,369,950  44,654,709  41,990,686  44,654,709 
Non-controlling interest (Note 7(vi)) 34,078,444  34,250,468 
Non-controlling interest (Note 7(vii)) 41,151,023  34,250,468 
            
Total Shareholders’ Equity 77,448,394  78,905,177  83,141,709  78,905,177 
            
Total Liabilities, Temporary Equity and Shareholders’ Equity$ 131,526,047 $ 129,517,335 $ 170,366,842 $ 129,517,335 

Basis of Presentation and Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (Note 1)
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)
Subsequent Events (Note 13)14)

Approved by the Directors:

Approved by the Directors:
H. Lutz Klingmann” Thomas M. Clay” Thomas M. Clay”Bryan A. Coates”
H. Lutz Klingmann, DirectorThomas M. Clay, Director
Chairman 
 See Accompanying Summary of Accounting Policies and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial StatementsBryan A. Coates, Director


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Income/(Loss) and Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
(Unaudited - US dollars)

  Three Months  Three Months 
  Ended  Ended 
  March 31, 2015  March 31, 2014 
       
General and administrative expenses (Notes 7 and 12)$ (739,533)$ (1,065,257)
Change in fair value of derivative liability including change in
      foreign exchange (Note 7(ii))
 (101,749) (5,747,376)
       
  (841,282) (6,812,633)
       
Interest expense (Note 7(v)) (947,753) (691,297)
Interest income 66,142  9,292 
Net and comprehensive
    income (loss) for the period
 (1,722,893) (7,494,638)
Add: Net and comprehensive loss attributable to the non-controlling
    interest for the period (Note 7(vi))
 286,706  - 
Net and comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Golden Queen Mining
    Co Ltd. for the period
$ (1,436,187)$ (7,494,638)
       
Income (loss) per share - basic (Note 9)$ (0.01)$ (0.08)
       
Income (loss) per share - diluted (Note 9)$ (0.01)$ (0.08)
       
       
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - basic 99,785,350  99,260,653 
       
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted 99,785,350  99,260,653 

See Accompanying Summary of Accounting Policies and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial
Statements


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, Non-controlling Interest and Redeemable Portion of Non-controlling Interest
(Unaudited - US dollars)

                       Redeemable 
              Total Shareholders’     Total  Portion of Non- 
  Common     Additional  Deficit  Equity attributable  Non-controlling  Shareholders’  controlling 
  Shares  Amount  Paid-in Capital  Accumulated  to GQM Ltd  Interest  Equity  Interest 
Balance, December 31, 2013 99,233,383 $ 62,289,402 $ 9,927,142 $ (65,975,612)$ 6,240,932 $ - $ 6,240,932 $ - 
Issuance of common shares
    for mineral property
 15,300  24,480  -  -  24,480  -  24,480  - 
Stock options exercised 530,000  395,133  (283,712) -  111,421  -  111,421  - 
Stock-based compensation -  -  233,672  -  233,672  -  233,672  - 
Dilution of ownership
    interest in subsidiary to
    non-controlling interest
 -  -  46,513,408  -  46,513,408  38,091,955  84,605,363  25,394,637 
Distributions to non- 
   controlling interest
 -  -  -  -  -  (3,000,000) (3,000,000) (2,000,000)
Net loss for the year -  -  -  (8,469,204) (8,469,204) (841,487) (9,310,691) (560,992)
                         
Balance, December 31, 2014 99,778,683 $ 62,709,015 $ 56,390,510 $ (74,444,816)$ 44,654,709 $ 34,250,468 $78,905,177  22,833,645 
Issuance of common shares
    as part of management
    agreement
 150,000  151,428  -  -  151,428  -  151,428  - 
Net loss for the period -  -  -  (1,436,187) (1,436,187) (172,024) (1,608,211) (114,682)
                         
Balance, March 31, 2015 99,928,683 $ 62,860,443 $ 56,390,510 $ (75,881,003)$ 43,369,950 $ 34,078,444 $77,448,394 $ 22,718,963 

See Accompanying Summary of Accounting Policies and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Condensed
Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash FlowsIncome/(Loss) and Comprehensive Income/(Loss)

(Unaudited - US dollars)

  Three Months  Three Months 
  Ended  Ended 
  March 31, 2015  March 31, 2014 
Operating activities:      
Net income (loss) for the period$ (1,722,893)$ (7,494,638)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash used in operating      
   activities:      
   Amortization and depreciation 7,700  9,327 
   Amortization of debt discount and interest accrual 934,342  691,297 
   Change in fair value of derivative liabilities including change in foreign
       exchange
 101,749  5,747,376 
   Shares for services (Note 12) 151,428  - 
   Stock-based compensation -  96,074 
   Unrealized foreign exchange (581,102) (179,506)
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
   Receivables 17,635  (11,582)
   Prepaid expenses and other current assets (143,117) 17,047 
   Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 132,611  107,920 
   Interest payable (250,000) - 
       
Cash used in operating activities (1,351,647) (1,016,685)
       
Investment activities:      
   Additions to mineral property interests (18,222,379) (3,087,272)
   Release (Purchase) of financial assurance (14) 15 
       
Cash used in investing activities (18,222,393) (3,087,257)
Financing activities:      
   Borrowing under short-term debt -  10,000,000 
   Repayment of short-term debt (2,500,000) - 
   Closing fees related to short-term debt (250,000) - 
   Issuance of common shares upon exercise of stock options -  12,721 
       
Cash (used in)/provided by financing activities (2,750,000) 10,012,721 
       
Net change in cash (22,324,040) 5,908,779 
Cash, Beginning balance 91,407,644  5,030,522 
Cash, Ending balance$ 69,083,604 $ 10,939,301 

Supplementary Disclosures of Cash Flow Information (Note 8)

  Three Months  Three Months  Six Months  Six Months 
  Ended  Ended  Ended  Ended 
  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014 
             
General and administrative expenses (Notes 8 and 12)$ (1,991,215)$ (2,081,950)$ (2,730,747)$ (3,147,208)
Change in fair value of derivative liability including change in foreign exchange (Notes 7(ii) and 7(iv)) 2,568,849  1,634,681  2,467,100  (4,112,695)
             
  577,634  (447,269) (263,647) (7,259,903)
Interest expense (Note 7(vi)) (1,070,111) (264,120) (2,017,864) (955,417)
             
Loss on extinguishment of debt (Note 7(iii)) (151,539) -  (151,539) - 
Closing fee (Note 7(iii)) (1,500,000) -  (1,500,000) - 
Interest income 52,383  5,546  118,525  14,838 
Net and comprehensive income (loss) for the period (2,091,633) (705,843) (3,814,525) (8,200,482)
Add: Net and comprehensive loss attributable to the non-controlling interest for the period (Note 7(vii)) 712,368  -  999,074  - 
             
Net and comprehensive income (loss) attributable to Golden Queen Mining Co Ltd. for the period$ (1,379,265)$ (705,843)$ (2,815,451)$ (8,200,482)
             
Earnings (Loss) per share – basic (Note 9)$ (0.01)$ (0.01)$ (0.03)$ (0.08)
             
             
Earnings (Loss) per share – diluted (Note 9)$ (0.01)$ (0.02)$ (0.03)$ (0.08)
             
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding -basic 99,928,683  99,619,562  99,857,412  99,441,099 
             
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding - diluted 99,928,683  109,418,434  99,857,412  99,441,099 

See Accompanying Summary of Accounting Policies and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial
Statements


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Shareholders’ Equity, Non-controlling Interest and Redeemable Portion of Non-controlling Interest
(Unaudited - US dollars)

              Total        Redeemable 
              Shareholders’     Total  Portion of Non- 
  Common     Additional  Deficit  Equity attributable  Non-controlling  Shareholders’  controlling 
  Shares  Amount  Paid-in Capital  Accumulated  to GQM Ltd  Interest  Equity  Interest 
Balance, December 31, 2013 99,233,383 $ 62,289,402 $ 9,927,142 $ (65,975,612)$ 6,240,932 $ - $ 6,240,932 $ - 
Issuance of common shares 
   for mineral property
 15,300  24,480  -  -  24,480  -  24,480  - 
Stock options exercised 530,000  395,133  (283,712) -  111,421  -  111,421  - 
Stock-based compensation -  -  233,672  -  233,672  -  233,672  - 
Dilution of ownership 
   interest in subsidiary to 
   non-controlling interest
 -  -  46,513,408  -  46,513,408  38,091,955  84,605,363  25,394,637 
Distributions to non- 
   controlling interest
 -  -  -  -  -  (3,000,000) (3,000,000) (2,000,000)
Net loss for the year -  -  -  (8,469,204) (8,469,204) (841,487) (9,310,691) (560,992)
                         
Balance, December 31, 2014 99,778,683 $ 62,709,015 $ 56,390,510 $ (74,444,816)$ 44,654,709 $ 34,250,468 $ 78,905,177 $ 22,833,645 
Issuance of common shares 
   as part of management agreement
 150,000  151,428  -  -  151,428  -  151,428  - 
Top-up contribution to non-
    controlling interest
 -  -  -  -  -  7,500,000  7,500,000  5,000,000 
Net loss for the period -  -  -  (2,815,451) (2,815,451) (599,445) (3,414,896) (399,629)
                         
Balance, June 30, 2015 99,928,683 $ 62,860,443 $ 56,390,510 $ (77,260,267)$ 41,990,686 $ 41,151,023 $ 83,141,709 $ 27,434,016 

See Accompanying Summary of Accounting Policies and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Condensed Consolidated Interim Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited - US dollars)

  Six Months  Six Months 
  Ended  Ended 
  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014 
Operating activities:      
Net income (loss) for the period$ (3,814,525)$ (8,200,482)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash used in operating activities:    
   Amortization and depreciation 15,027  18,223 
   Amortization of debt discount and interest accrual 1,973,307  955,417 
   Change in fair value of derivative liabilities including change in foreign exchange (2,467,100) 4,112,695 
   Shares for services (Note 7(i) and Note 12) 151,428  - 
   Stock-based compensation -  192,148 
   Loss on extinguishment of debt (Note 7(iii)) 151,539  - 
   Closing fee related to long-term debt 1,500,000  - 
   Unrealized foreign exchange (497,411) 18,369 
Changes in assets and liabilities:      
   Receivables 20,407  (14,752)
   Prepaid expenses and other current assets (1,029,096) (100,102)
   Accounts payable and accrued liabilities 597,434  203,275 
   Interest payable (797,945) - 
       
Cash used in operating activities (4,196,935) (2,815,209)
       
Investment activities:      
   Additions to mineral property interests (34,389,709) (7,250,113)
   Purchase of financial assurance (349,053) - 
       
Cash used in investing activities (34,738,762) (7,250,113)
Financing activities:      
   Top-up contribution 12,500,000  - 
   Borrowing under long-term debt 25,000,000  - 
   Repayment of short-term debt (2,500,000) - 
   Borrowing under short-term debt -  10,000,000 
   Closing fees related to short-term debt capitalized to the loan (250,000) - 
   Closing fees related to long-term debt (1,500,000) - 
   Issuance of common shares upon exercise of stock options -  111,421 
       
Cash provided by financing activities 33,250,000  10,111,421 
       
Net change in cash (5,685,697) 46,099 
Cash, Beginning balance 91,407,644  5,030,522 
       
Cash, Ending balance$ 85,721,947 $ 5,076,621 
       
 Supplementary Disclosures of Cash Flow Information (Note 8)      

See Accompanying Summary of Accounting Policies and Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

Nature of BusinessGolden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (“Golden Queen”, “GQM Ltd.” or the “Company”) is engaged in the development of the Soledad Mountain Project (“the Project”), located in the Mojave Mining District, Kern County, California. The Company originally used its wholly owned subsidiary, Golden Queen Mining Company, Inc. (“GQM Inc.”), to explore and develop the Project. On September 10, 2014, GQM Inc. was converted to a limited liability company, Golden Queen Mining Company, LLC (“GQM LLC”). The Company entered into a Joint Venture (the “JV”) agreementTransaction with Gauss LLC (“Gauss”) through its newly formed, wholly owned subsidiary, Golden Queen Mining Holdings, Inc. (“GQM Holdings”). The JVJoint Venture Transaction was completed on September 15, 2014. Upon completion of the JV,Joint Venture Transaction, both the Company, through GQM Holdings, and Gauss each owned, and continue to own, 50% of GQM LLC. In February 2015, the Company incorporated Golden Queen Mining Canada Ltd. (“GQM Canada”), a wholly-owned British Columbia subsidiary, to hold the Company’s interest in GQM Holdings.

Principles of ConsolidationThe Company consolidates all entities in which it can vote a majority of the outstanding voting stock. In addition, it consolidates entities which meet the definition of a variable interest entity for which it is the primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the party who has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and who has an obligation to absorb losses of the entity or a right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the entity. We consider special allocations of cash flows and preferences, if any, to determine amounts allocable to non-controlling interests. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

These condensed consolidated interim financial statements include the accounts of Golden Queen, a British Columbia corporation, its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Golden Queen Mining Canada Ltd. (“GQM Canada”), GQM Holdings, a US (State of California) corporation, and GQM LLC, a limited liability company in which Golden Queen has a 50% interest, through GQM Holdings. GQM LLC meets the definition of a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”). Golden Queen has determined it is the member of the related party group that is most closely associated with GQM LLC and, as a result, is the primary beneficiary who consolidates GQM LLC.

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”)The condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

CashFor purposes of balance sheet classification and the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with high quality financial institutions. At times, such cash deposits may be in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. To date, the Company has not experienced a loss or lack of access to its cash and cash equivalents. However, no assurance can be provided that access to the Company’s cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse economic conditions in the financial markets.

PropertyProperty is stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated service lives of the respective assets, which range from 0 to 30 years, as follows:

Rental properties30 years
LandNot depreciated

The Company has instituted a policy that all property and equipment acquired for an amount over $3,000 will be capitalized and all property and equipment purchased for under this threshold will be expensed as incurred.

Mineral PropertiesCosts related to the development of our mineral reserves are capitalized whenit has been determined an ore body can be economically developed. An ore body is determined to be economically minable based on proven and probable reserves and when appropriate permits are in place. Major mine development expenditures are capitalized, including primary development costs such as costs of building access roads, heap leach pads, processing facilities, and infrastructure development.

Costs for exploration, pre-production development, if and when applicable, and maintenance and repairs on capitalized property, plant and equipment are charged to operations as incurred. Exploration costs include those relating to activities carried out in search of previously unidentified mineral deposits. Pre-production development activities involve costs incurred in the exploration stage that may ultimately benefit production that are expensed due to the lack of evidence of economic development, which is necessary to demonstrate future recoverability of these expenses.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

Secondary development costs are incurred for preparation of an ore body for production in a specific ore block, stope or work area, providing a relatively short-lived benefit only to the mine area they relate to, and not to the ore body as a whole.

Drilling and related costs are either classified as exploration or secondary development, as defined above, and charged to operations as incurred, or capitalized, based on the following criteria:

Whether or not the costs are incurred to further define mineralization at and adjacent to existing reserve areas or intended to assist with mine planning within a reserve area;

Whether or not the drilling costs relate to an ore body that has been determined to be commercially mineable, and a decision has been made to put the ore body into commercial production; and

Whether or not at the time that the cost is incurred, the expenditure: (a) embodies a probable future benefit that involves a capacity, singly or in combination, with other assets to contribute directly or indirectly to future net cash inflows, (b) we can obtain the benefit and control others’ access to it, and (c) the transaction or event giving rise to our right to or control of the benefit has already occurred.

If all of these criteria are met, drilling and related costs are capitalized. Drilling costs not meeting all of these criteria are expensed as incurred. The following factors are considered in determining whether or not the criteria listed above have been met, and capitalization of drilling costs is appropriate:

Completion of a favourable economic study and mine plan for the ore body targeted;

Authorization of development of the ore body by management and/or the Board of Directors; and

All permitting and/or contractual requirements necessary for us to have the right to or control of the future benefit from the targeted ore body have been met.

Once production has commenced, capitalized costs will be depleted using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the proven and probable reserves. If mineral properties are subsequently abandoned or impaired, any capitalized costs will be charged to the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for that period.

We assess the carrying cost of our mineral properties for impairment whenever information or circumstances indicate the potential for impairment. Such evaluations compare estimated future net cash flows with our carrying costs and future obligations on an undiscounted basis. If it is determined that the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property, a write down to the estimated fair value is charged to the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the period. Where estimates of future net cash flows are not available and where other conditions suggest impairment, management assesses if the carrying value can be recovered.

Capitalized Interest For significant exploration and development projects, interest is capitalized as part of the historical cost of developing and constructing assets in accordance with ASC 835-20 ("capitalization of interest"). Interest is capitalized until the asset is ready for service. Capitalized interest is determined by multiplying the Company’s weighted-average borrowing cost on general debt by the average amount of qualifying costs incurred. Once an asset subject to interest capitalization is completed and placed in service, the associated capitalized interest is expensed through depletion or impairment. See Note 7(v)7(vi) - Amortization of Discount and Interest Expense.

Valuation of Long-lived AssetsAccounting standards require recognition of impairment of long-lived assets in the event the carrying value of such assets may not be recoverable. It requires that those long-lived assets to be disposed of by sale are to be measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost of sale whether or not reported in continuing operations or in discontinued operations. In accordance with the provisions of the accounting standard 360-10-35, the Company reviews the carrying value of its mineral properties on a regular basis. Estimated undiscounted future cash flows from the mineral properties are compared with the current carrying value in order to determine if impairment exists. Reductions to the carrying value, if necessary, are recorded to the extent the net book value of the property exceeds the estimate of future discounted cash flows or liquidation value.

Foreign Currency Translation The Company’s functional and reporting currency, the US dollar, is the primary economic currency. Assets and liabilities in foreign currencies are generally translated into US dollars at the exchange rate on the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at exchange rates on the date of the transaction. Where amounts denominated in a foreign currency are converted into US dollars by remittance or repayment, the realized exchange differences are included in other income. The exchange rates prevailing at March 31,June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were $1.27$1.25 and $1.16, and stated in Canadian dollars per one US dollar, respectively. The average rates of exchange during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014 were $1.24 and $1.10, stated in Canadian dollars per one US dollar, respectively.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

Earnings (Loss) Per ShareThe Company computes and discloses earnings (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, “Earnings per Share”, which requires dual presentation of basic earnings (loss) per share and diluted earnings (loss) per share on the face of all income statements presented for all entities with complex capital structures. Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed as net income (loss) attributed to the Company divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through stock options, warrants and convertible instruments. Net income attributable to any non-controlling interest is not included in the calculation of the basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share.

Reclamation Costs (Asset Retirement Obligations) The Company accrues the estimated costs associated with reclamation obligations in the period in which the liability is incurred or becomes determinable. Until such time that a project life is established or the Company begins capitalizing exploration expenditures when an ore body can be economically developed, the Company records the corresponding cost as an expense. The costs of future expenditures for reclamation are not discounted to their present value unless subject to a contractually obligated fixed payment schedule.

Future reclamation expenditures are difficult to estimate due to the early-stage nature of the Project, the uncertainties associated with defining the nature and extent of environmental disturbance, the application of laws and regulations by regulatory authorities and changes in reclamation requirements. The Company periodically reviews the provision for such reclamation costs as evidence indicating that the liabilities have potentially changed. Changes in estimates are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss) and Comprehensive Income (Loss) in the period an estimate is revised.

The Company is unable to determine the estimated timing of expenditures relating to reclamation accruals. It is reasonably possible that the ultimate cost of reclamation and remediation could change in the future and that changes to these estimates could have a material effect on future operating results as new information becomes known.

EstimatesThe preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates and judgements have been made by Management in several areas including the accounting for the joint venture transaction and determination of the temporary and permanent non-controlling interest (Note 7(vi)7(vii)), the recoverability of mineral properties expenditures (Note 3), reclamation reserves (Note 3)5), warrant liability (Note 7(iv)) and convertible debenture (Note 7(ii)). Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Fair Value of Financial InstrumentsThe carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, interest payable, closing fee payable and notes payablereclamation financial assurance approximate fair values because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these non-level 3 financial instruments. The fair value of the short-term and long-term loans payable approximates theapproximate their carrying valuevalues as the interest rates are based on the market rates as they were initiated during the quarter or just before December 31, 2014.Theand the previous two quarters. The market rates have remained steady for the loans payable during the past three quarters. The carrying value of the short and long term portions of the notes payable approximates their carrying value and have been estimated based on discounted cash flows using interest rates being offered for similar debt instruments. The carrying amount of the convertible debt instrument isand the notes payable are being recorded at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. As at March 31,June 30, 2015, the estimated fair value of the convertible debt using a discounted cash flow analysis based on an interest rate for a similar type of instrument without a conversion feature was $8,456,064$7,686,009 (December 31, 2014: $7,972,993). The fair value of the reclamation financial assurance approximates the carrying value due to its short term nature. The embedded derivativederivatives in connection with the convertible debenture isand the share purchase warrants are being recorded at itstheir fair valuevalues using an acceptable valuation model at each reporting period.

Income TaxesThe Company follows the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes whereby the deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences of differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. If it is determined that the realization of the future tax benefit is not more likely than not, the Company establishes a valuation allowance.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

Stock Option PlanThe Company’s current stock option plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Company in 2013 and approved by shareholders of the Company in 2013. The Plan provides a fixed number of 7,200,000 common shares of the Company that may be issued pursuant to the grant of stock options. The exercise price of stock options granted under the Plan shall be determined by the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”), but shall not be less than the volume-weighted, average trading price of the Company’s shares on the TSX for the five trading days immediately prior to the date of the grant. The expiry date of a stock option shall be the date so fixed by the Board subject to a maximum term of five years. The Plan provides that the expiry date of the vested portion of a stock optionsoption will terminate onbe the earlier of the expiry ofdate so fixed by the termBoard at the time the stock option is awarded and (i) 12 months from the early termination date an option holder dies, (ii) 12 months from(the “Early Termination Date”). The Early Termination Date will be the date the vested portion of a stock option expires following the option holder ceasesceasing to act asbe a director, employee or officerconsultant, as determined by the Board at the time of grant, or in the Company, or (iii) 12 months fromabsence thereof at any time prior to the datetime the option holder ceases to be employed,a director, employee or engaged as a consultant, byin accordance with and subject to the Company.provisions of the Plan. All options granted under the 2013 Plan will be subject to such vesting requirements as may be prescribed by the TSX, if applicable, or as may be imposed by the Board. A total of 750,000700,000 (December 31, 2014 – 750,000) common shares were issuable pursuant to such stock options as at March 31,June 30, 2015.

Stock-based CompensationCompensation costs are charged to the consolidated statements of income (loss) and comprehensive income (loss). Compensation costs for employees are amortized over the period from the grant date to the date the options vest. Compensation expense for non-employees is recognized immediately for past services and pro-rata for future services over the service provision period.

We account for stock-based compensation awards granted to non-employees in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 505-50,Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees, or ASC 505-50. Under ASC 505-50, we determine the fair value of the stock-based compensation awards granted as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. If the fair value of equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete.

The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of stock options at the date of grant. Option pricing models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected price volatility. Changes in these assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate.

Derivative Financial InstrumentsThe Company reviews the terms of its equity instruments and other financing arrangements to determine whether or not there are embedded derivative instruments that are required to be accounted for separately as a derivative financial instrument. Also, in connection with the issuance of financing instruments, the Company may issue freestanding options or warrants that may, depending on their terms, be accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, rather than as equity. The Company may also issue options or warrants to non-employees in connection with consulting or other services.

Derivative financial instruments are measured at their fair value. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to profit or loss. For simple warrant-based derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate fair value of the derivative instruments. For more complex derivative financial instruments, including warrants that do not have a fixed exercise price, the Company uses acceptable pricing models to estimate fair value of the derivative instrument.

The classification of derivative instruments, including whether or not such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is reassessed at the end of each reporting period. If reclassification is required, the fair value of the derivative instrument, as of the determination date, is reclassified. Any previous charges or credits to income for changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument are not reversed. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

New Accounting Policies

(i)Effective August 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards update (“ASU”) 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40 –Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The update essentially requires management of all entities, for annual and interim periods, to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:

1.

Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans).

2.

Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations.

3.

Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there issubstantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concernwithin one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:

1.

Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

2.

Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations.

3.

Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

This update will come into effect for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The Company is assessing the impact of this standard.

ii) In February, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02,Consolidation (Topic 810) – Amendments to the Consolidation Analysiswhich focuses on the consolidation evaluation for reporting organizations (public and private companies and not-for-profit organizations) that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. In addition to reducing the number of consolidation models from four to two, the new standard simplifies the standards and improves current GAAP by:

Placing more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest. A reporting organization may no longer have to consolidate a legal entity in certain circumstances based solely on its fee arrangement, when certain criteria are met.

Reducing the frequency of the application of related-party guidance when determining a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (VIE).

Changing consolidation conclusions for public and private companies in several industries that typically make use of limited partnerships or VIEs.

The ASU will be effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is assessing the impact of this standard.

iii) In April, 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) which focuses on simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs, the amendments in this update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this update.

The ASU will be effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is assessing the impact of this standard.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

1.

1. Basis of Presentation and Ability to Continue as a Going Concern

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements and notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, necessary to present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. and its consolidated subsidiaries. These unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with our audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes as set forth in our annual report filed on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as it may be amended from time to time.

The results of operations for the periods presented may not be indicative of those which may be expected for a full year. The unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in audited financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures are adequate for the information not to be misleading.

The Company has had no revenues from operations since inception and as at March 31,June 30, 2015 had a deficit of $75,881,003$77,260,267 (December 31, 2014 - $74,444,816) and working capital of $41,488,586$68,945,969 (December 31, 2014 –$65,110,327)- $65,110,327).

On June 9, 2014, theThe Company announced that it had entered into an agreement (the “JV”) with Gauss LLC (“Gauss”) for aand its 50% interest in the Project. On September 9, 2014, the Company’s shareholders approved the JV, which then closed on September 15, 2014. Pursuant to the JV, the Company’s wholly owned-owned subsidiary, Golden Queen Mining Co., Inc. (“GQM Inc.”) was converted into a limited liability company, GQM LLC. On closing of the JV, Gauss invested $110,000,000 into GQM LLC, and received 110,000 newly created membership units of GQM LLC to give it 50% ownership, with the Company retaining 50% interest in GQM LLC through its newly formed and wholly owned subsidiary GQM Holdings. The JV and thus the Project continues to be consolidated in the financial statements of Golden Queen.See Note 7 (vi) for complete details on the JV.The funds received from Gauss’ investment will help the Company move the Project through the development stage and into the production phase.

At the Project level, GQM LLC isare a going concern as it hasboth have sufficient funds to meet itstheir contractual obligations for the next twelve months. However, the assets of GQM LLC are not available to be used to satisfy the obligations of Golden Queen. Therefore, on a non-consolidated basis, the ability of Golden Queen to obtain financing for its ongoing activities and thus maintain solvency, or to fund its attributable portion of capital requirements under the joint venture, is dependent on equity market conditions, the market for precious metals, and the willingness of other parties to lend this entity money. Golden Queen

The Company however has a related party outstanding$37.5 million loan in the amount of $12,500,000 plus accrued interest that will come due in July 2015 and a related party convertible debenture in the amount of C$10,000,000 plus accrued interest that will also come due in July 2015. The Company has the option to settle the C$10,000,000 convertible debt by issuing common shares at maturity. The loan and the convertible debenture were provided by members of the Clay family, who are shareholders of the Company, members which include an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company.

maturing on December 8, 2016. Golden Queen, on a non-consolidated basis, currently does not have sufficient funds to repay the $12,500,000 loan at the issuance date of the consolidated financial statements.this loan. This raises substantial doubt about this entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

However, in order to secure the necessary funds to meet this upcoming obligation and mitigate the going concern uncertainty, management The Company is actively exploring severalevaluating its options, including debt financing and equity, offering. The Company recently filed a Form S-3 shelf prospectus into re-finance the U.S. (dated August 21, 2014) and a final short form shelf prospectus in Canada (dated March 18, 2015) in preparation for a potential equity raise. The Company is also in discussions with lenders to potentially secure debt financing that would allow the Company to repay the $12,500,000 loan. Management will review and assess all options available to find the most beneficial option to the Company and its shareholders. While Golden Queen has been successful in certain of these efforts in the past, there can be no assurance that future efforts will be successful.June 2015 Loan before or at maturity.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

These condensed consolidated interim financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
2.

Property


Property consists of:      
  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Land$ 109,600 $ 109,600 
Rental properties 324,566  324,566 
Property, cost 434,166  434,166 
Less accumulated depreciation (197,726) (182,699)
Property, net$ 236,440 $ 251,467 

3.

2. Property

Property consists of:

  March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Land$ 109,600 $ 109,600 
Rental properties 324,566  324,566 
Property, cost 434,166  434,166 
Less accumulated depreciation (190,399) (182,699)
Property, net$ 243,767 $ 251,467 

3. Mineral Property Interests

In July 2012, the Company received notice that it had met all the remaining major conditions of the conditional use permits for development of the Project and began capitalizing all development expenditures directly related to the Project. Prior to July 2012, all acquisition costs were expensed due to uncertainties around obtaining the necessary permits. Components of capitalized costs related to the mineral properties as of March 31,June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows:

 March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
            
Mineral property interest, land and claims$ 3,558,541 $ 3,299,319 $ 3,811,821 $ 3,299,319 
Deferred mine development costs 54,159,203  31,020,717  73,509,565  31,020,717 
Asset retirement costs 272,567  272,567  550,807  272,567 
Capitalized interest 3,114,200  2,412,015  3,997,182  2,412,015 
Capitalized depreciation 248,579  133,516  461,248  133,516 
      
Balance, end of the period$ 61,353,090 $ 37,138,134 $ 82,330,623 $ 37,138,134 


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

3.

Mineral Property Interests - Continued

As at March 31,June 30, 2015, included in deferred mine development costs are buildings and equipment with a total accumulated cost of $6,532,005$9,085,651 (December 31, 2014 - $2,424,635). Total additions during the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 were $4,107,371$2,553,646 and $6,661,016 (Three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2014 - $76,356)$107,228 and $183,585). During the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, depreciation of $115,063$212,669 and $327,732 (Three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2014 - $6,830)$14,270 and $21,100) relating to these assets was capitalized within deferred mine development.

The Company is capitalizing a portion of the interest expense related to the convertible debenture and loan in accordance with its accounting policy. See Note 7 (v)(vi) –Amortization of Discount and Interest Expense.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

4.

4. Share Capital

The Company’s common shares outstanding have no par value, and are voting shares with no preferences or rights attached to them.

Common shares - 2015

In March 2015, the Company issued 150,000 common shares to the President of the Company for achieving two of the three milestones outlined in his management agreement (See Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies). The common shares had a total fair value of $151,428 (Note 4)7(i)). The fair value was based on the market price on the date of issuance.

Common shares - 2014

In May 2014, 300,000 stock options were exercised and the Company issued 300,000 common shares at $0.21 per share for proceeds of $63,000. The total transferred to share capital from additional paid-in capital upon exercise of stock options was $160,592.

In April 2014, 170,000 stock options were exercised and the Company issued 170,000 common shares at $0.21 per share for proceeds of $35,700. The total transferred to share capital from additional paid-in capital upon exercise of stock options was $91,002.

In February 2014, the Company issued 15,300 common shares for mineral property interests with a total fair value of $24,480. The fair value was based on the market price on the date of issuance.

In February 2014, 60,000 stock options were exercised and the Company issued 60,000 common shares at $0.21 per share for proceeds of $12,721. The total transferred to share capital from additional paid-in capital upon exercise of stock options was $32,118.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

4.

Share Capital - Continued

Stock options

The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options granted. In accordance with the accounting standard for employees, the compensation expense is amortized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, which approximates the vesting period. Compensation expense for stock options granted to non-employees is amortized over the contract services period or, if none exists, from the date of grant until the options vest. Compensation associated with unvested options granted to non-employees is remeasured on each balance sheet date using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

The following is a summary of stock option activity during the threesix months ended March 31, 2015:June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014:

    Weighted 
    Average Exercise     Weighted Average
Exercise Price
 
 Shares  Price per Share  Shares  per Share 
Options outstanding, December 31, 2013 1,380,000 $0.87  1,380,000 $0.87 
Options exercised (60,000)$0.21  (530,000)$0.21 
Option outstanding, March 31, 2014 1,320,000 $0.90 
Options exercisable, March 31, 2014 820,000 $0.71 
Option outstanding, June 30, 2014 850,000 $1.27 
Options exercisable, June 30, 2014 650,000 $1.29 
Options forfeited (100,000)$1.16  (100,000)$1.16 
Options exercised (470,000)$0.21 
Options outstanding and exercisable      
December 31, 2014 and March 31, 2015 750,000 $1.29 
Option outstanding and exercisable, December 31, 2014750,000$1.29
Options expired (50,000)$1.22 
      
Options outstanding and exercisable, June 30, 2015 700,000 $1.30 

There were no stock options issued during the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 and March 31,June 30, 2014.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

4. Share Capital – Continued

During the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, the Company recognized $Nil and $Nil (Three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2014 - $96,074)$96,074 and $192,148) in stock-based compensation relating to employee stock options that have vesting terms.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized $233,672 (2013 - $475,263) in stock-based compensation relating to employee stock options that have vesting terms. This included a reversal of $46,245 (2013 - $Nil) in stock based compensation related to forfeited stock options.

As at March 31,June 30, 2015, the aggregate intrinsic value of the outstanding exercisable options was $Nil (December 31, 2014 - $Nil).

The total intrinsic value of 530,000 options exercised during 2014 was approximately $754,513. There were no options exercised in the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

Stock options – Continued

4.                  Share Capital – Continued

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at March 31,June 30, 2015:

      Weighted    
   Number  Average    
   Outstanding  Remaining    
 Expiry and  Contractual Life  Exercise 
 Date Exercisable  (Years)  Price 
           
 April 18, 2015 50,000  0.05 $1.22 
 November 11, 2015 200,000  0.62 $1.16 
 June 3, 2018 50,000  3.18 $1.16 
 September 3, 2018 150,000  3.43 $1.59 
 September 18, 2018 300,000  3.47 $1.26 
           
 Outstanding, March 31, 2015 750,000  2.45    
 Exercisable, March 31, 2015 750,000  2.45    
     Weighted    
  Number  Average    
  Outstanding  Remaining    
Expiry and  Contractual Life  Exercise 
Date Exercisable  (Years)  Price 
          
November 11, 2015 200,000  0.37  $1.16 
June 3, 2018 50,000  2.93  $1.16 
September 3, 2018 150,000  3.18  $1.59 
September 18, 2018 300,000  3.22  $1.26 
          
Outstanding, June 30, 2015 700,000  2.38    
Exercisable, June 30, 2015 700,000  2.38    

Share Purchase Warrants

During the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company granted 10,000,000 share purchase warrants. The following is a summary of the share purchase warrant activity:

June 30, 2015December 31, 2014
Balance, beginning of the period$ -$ -
Issued10,000,000-
Balance, end of the period$ 10,000,000$ -

     Weighted    
     Average    
     Remaining    
Expiry Number  Contractual Life  Exercise 
Date Outstanding  (Years)  Price 
          
June 8, 2020 10,000,000  4.94 $0.95 

5.

5. Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company is required to provide the Bureau of Land Management, the State Office of Mine Reclamation and Kern County with a revised reclamation cost estimate annually. The financial assurance is adjusted once the cost estimate is approved.

The Company’s provision for reclamation of the property is estimated each year by an independent consulting engineer. This estimate, once approved by state and county authorities, forms the basis for a cash deposit of reclamation financial assurance. The reclamation estimate for 2015 is $624,142 (December 31, 2014 - $624,142).

In addition to the above, the Company is required to obtain and maintain financial assurance for initiating and completing corrective action and remediation of a reasonably foreseeable release from the Project’s waste management units as required by the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (the “Regional Board”). The reclamation estimate for 2015 is $278,240 (December 31, 2014 - $Nil).

The Company has provided reclamation financial assurance to the Bureau of Land Management, the State and Kern County and a reasonably foreseeable release financial assurance to the Regional Board totaling $553,343 (2014$902,382 (December 31, 2014 - $553,329)$553,329; June 30, 2014 - $478,739). This deposit earns interest at 0.1% per annum and

The total asset retirement obligation as of June 30, 2015 is not available for working capital purposes.$902,382 (December 31, 2014 - $624,142; June 30, 2014 - $552,250).


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

5.

Asset Retirement Obligations – Continued

The Company estimated its asset retirement obligations based on its understanding of the requirements to reclaim and clean up theclean-up its property within the Project based on its activities and planned activities to date.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For During the Three Months Ended March 31,three and six months ended June 30, 2015,
(Unaudited - US dollars)

5. Asset Retirement Obligations - Continued

Management made the decision to capitalize all development expenditures directly related there was an increase of $278,240 to the Project in July 2012,retirement obligations as a result $Nil (Decembercompared with the year ended December 31, 2014- $71,892)2014, where $71,892 was capitalized to mineral property interests as the asset portion of the retirement obligation forobligation. The amount was capitalized as the three months ended March 31, 2015. Company is in the development stage and is capitalizing all of its development costs pursuant to our policy.

The following is a summary of asset retirement obligations:

   2015  2014 
 Balance, beginning of the period$ 624,142 $ 552,250 
 Changes in cash flow estimates -  71,892 
 Balance, end of the period$ 624,142 $ 624,142 
  June 30,  December 31, 
  2015  2014 
Balance, beginning of the period$ 624,142 $ 552,250 
Changes in cash flow estimates 278,240  71,892 
Balance, end of the period$ 902,382 $ 624,142 

6.

6. Commitments and Contingencies

Property rent payments (Advance minimum royalties)

The Company has acquired a number of mineral properties outright. It has acquired exclusive rights to explore, develop and mine other portions of the Project under various mining lease agreements with landowners.

The Company is required to make property rent payments related to its mining lease agreements with landholders, in the form of advance minimum royalties. The total property rent payments for the three and six month periodperiods ended March 31,June, 2015 were $10,000$50,167 and $60,167 (Three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2014 - $34,480$65,500 and $99,980 of which $24,480 related to common shares issued), and the Company is expected to make approximate payments of $150,000$140,000 in 2015 to various landowners under the existing lease agreements. The payments will cease if and when the Company goes into production and then begins paying royalty payments on production yields.

There are multiple third party landholders and the royalty amount due to each landholder over the life of the Project varies with each property.

Finder’s fee

The Company has agreed to issue 100,000 common shares as a finder’s fee in connection with certain property acquisitions upon commencement of commercial production of the Project. As of March 31,June 30, 2015, commercial production has not commenced and no shares have been issued.

Management agreement

In 2004, the Company entered into an agreement with the President of the Company to issue 300,000 bonus shares upon completion of certain milestones. Upon receipt by the Company of a bankable feasibility study and the decision to place the Property into commercial production (Achieved), a bonus of 150,000 (Issued) common shares would be issued. Upon commencement of commercial production on the Property, a further bonus of 150,000 common shares would be issued. In May 2010, the Company entered into an amendment to the agreement whereby the 300,000 bonus shares would alternatively be issuable upon a change of control transaction, or upon a sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets, having a value at or above C$1.00 per share of the Company, with a further 300,000 bonus shares being issuable in the event the change of control transaction or asset sale occurred at a value at or above C$1.50 per share. This amended agreement is for a term of three years and shall automatically renew for two years. The first of two milestones was reached during the first quarter of 2015 and as a result 150,000 bonus shares, valued at $151,428, were issued to H. Lutz Klingmann on March 27, 2015.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

6.

Commitments and Contingencies - Continued

In May 2015, the Company replaced the President’s management agreement with an employment agreement. In addition to the previously mentioned bonus shares issuable upon commencement of commercial production, included in the agreement with the President is a provision that if the President’s position is lost upon a change of control or within six months of a change of control the President would be entitled to a one-time payment equal to twice the annual salary C$438,000 total plus twice the annual bonus. The annual bonus is determined by the Board subsequent to a review of the President’s performance.

In 2013, the Company entered into an employment agreement with the Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Included in the agreement with the CFO is a provision that if the CFO’s position is lost upon a change of control or within six months of a change of control the CFO would be entitled to a one-time payment equal to twice the annual salary, C$300,000 total, plus twice the annual bonus. The annual bonus is determined by the Board subsequent to a review of the CFO’s performance.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

6. Commitments and Contingencies - Continued

Compliance with Environmental Regulations

The Company’s exploration and development activities are subject to laws and regulations controlling not only the exploration and mining of mineral properties, but also the effect of such activities on the environment. Compliance with such laws and regulations may necessitate additional capital outlays or affect the economics of a project, and cause changes or delays in the Company’s activities.

Mine Development Commitments

As of June 30, 2015, GQM LLC has entered into contracts for construction totaling approximately $59.2$58.0 million, as of March 31, 2015, of which $26.2 million had been paid as of March 31, 2015.remains to be paid. The major commitments relate to the construction of the crushing-screening plant for $18.1 million, the construction of the Phase 1, Stage 1 heap leach pad for $8.3 million, the construction of the conveying and stacking system for $8.2 million and work related to the Merrill-Crowe plant equipment for $7.1 million. The commitments are expected to be paid out in 2015. GQM LLC made approximately $4.0 million in additional construction commitments subsequent to June 30, 2015.

In addition, GQM LLC committed, as of March 31,June 30, 2015, to $16.2$16.6 million of Komatsu mobile mining equipment with Road Machinery LLC. The final terms of the mobile equipment financing were not known as of March 31, 2015. As of March 31,June 30, 2015, GQM LLC received the water truck, a motor grader, twothree dozers, and two articulated trucks and two excavators valued at approximately $4.6$6.8 million (Refer to(see Note 10 - Loan Payable). In addition, four mining trucks and two loaders were delivered and assembled on site in April. The Company paid a 10% deposit of $0.9 million in April and expects to finance the remaining purchase price when it officially takes possession of the equipment later this year.

GQM LLC made approximately $1.4 million inunaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for more details). Please refer to Subsequent Events – Note 14 for additional construction commitments entered into by the Company subsequent to March 31,June 30, 2015.

7.

7. Related Party Transactions

Except as noted elsewhere in these consolidated financial statements, related party transactions are disclosed as follows:

(i)

Consulting Fees

  

For the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, the Company paid $188,934$12,378 and $201,312 (Three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2014 - $45,027)$39,032 and $84,059) to Mr. H. Lutz Klingmann for services as President of the Company of which $Nil (December 31, 2014 - $Nil; March 31,June 30, 2014 - $15,287)$13,797) is payable as at March 31,June 30, 2015. Included in the consulting fees for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 was $151,428 (Three(Six months ended March 31,June 30, 2014 - $Nil) related to 150,000 bonus shares issued in accordance with the Mr. H. Lutz Klingmann’s management agreement (Refer to Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies)Contingencies of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements). On May 1, 2015 Mr. Klingmann became an employee of the Company and his salary, since that date, is included under corporate salary expenses.

  

During the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, the Company paid a total of $18,438 (Three months ended March 31, 2014$18,414 and $36,852 respectively (2014 - $11,624)$11,815 and $23,439, respectively) for regular director fees to the three independent directors and Thomas M. Clay. Thomas M.Mr. Clay did not receive directorsdirectors’ fees during the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2014.

(ii)

Convertible Debentures

On July 26, 2013, the Company entered into agreements to issue convertible debentures for aggregate proceeds of C$10,000,000 ($9,710,603), from a significant shareholder group. The convertible debentures are unsecured and bear interest at 2% per annum, calculated on the outstanding principal balance, payable annually. The principal amounts of the notes are convertible into shares of the Company at a price of C$1.03 per share for a period of two years. If the notes have not been converted by the holder prior to the maturity date, then the Company may convert them at the lower of C$1.03 or the market price as at the maturity date.



GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

7.

7. Related Party Transactions – Continued


(ii)(ii)

Convertible Debentures - Continued

The market price on the maturity date will be determined based on the volume- weighted average price of the shares traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the five trading days preceding the maturity date.
A total of C$7,500,000 of the offering was subscribed for by an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company. The Company agreed to pay the legal fees incurred by the lenders relating to this instrument which amounted to $10,049.

On July 26, 2013, the Company entered into agreements to issue convertible debentures for aggregate proceeds of C$10,000,000 ($9,710,603), from a significant shareholder group. The convertible debentures are unsecured and bear interest at 2% per annum, calculated on the outstanding principal balance, payable annually. The principal amounts of the notes are convertible into shares of the Company at a price of C$1.03 per share for a period of two years. If the notes have not been converted by the holder prior to the maturity date, then the Company may convert them at the lower of C$1.03 or the market price as at the maturity date. Subsequent to June 30, 2015, the convertible debenture was repaid. Refer to Subsequent Events – Note 14 for complete details.

The market price on the maturity date will be determined based on the volume- weighted average price of the shares traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the five trading days preceding the maturity date.

A total of C$7,500,000 of the offering was subscribed for by an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company. The Company agreed to pay the legal fees incurred by the lenders relating to this instrument which amounted to $10,049.

The conversion feature of the convertible debentures meets the definition of a derivative liability instrument because the conversion feature is denominated in a currency other than the Company’s functional currency as well as the fact the exercise price is not a fixed price as described above. Therefore, the conversion feature does not meet the “fixed-for-fixed” criteria outlined in ASC 815-40-15.

As a result, the conversion feature of the notes is required to be recorded as a derivative liability recorded at fair value and marked-to-market each period with the changes in fair value each period being charged or credited to income or loss.

The fair value of the derivative liability related to the conversion feature as at June 30, 2015 is $12,414 (December 31, 2014 - $1,829,770). The derivative liability was calculated using an acceptable option pricing valuation model with the following assumptions:

 20152014
Risk-free interest rate0.49% - 0.50%1.00% - 1.09%
Expected life of derivative liability0.07 - 0.32 years0.57 - 1.32 years
Expected volatility49.36% - 77.00%73.03% - 98.21%
Dividend rate0.00%0.00%

The changes in the derivative liability related to the conversion feature are as follows:

  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
       
Balance, beginning of the period$1,829,770 $2,833,987 
Change in fair value of derivative liability including foreign exchange (1,817,356) (1,004,217)
Balance, end of the period$12,414 $1,829,770 

The change in the convertible debentures is as follows:

  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Balance, beginning of the period$6,649,967 $4,642,620 
Discounted convertible debentures -  - 
Amortization of discount 1,590,551  2,510,611 
Foreign exchange (491,482) (503,264)
Balance, end of the period$7,749,036 $6,649,967 

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, in addition to the amortization of the discount on the convertible debenture, the Company incurred interest expense of $40,301 and $80,586, respectively (Three and six months ended June 30, 2014 - $45,799 and $91,516, respectively) based on the 2% per annum stated interest rate for a total amortization of discount and interest expense of $882,982 and $1,671,137 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 (Three and six months ended June 30, 2014 - $638,837 and $1,205,134, respectively). Interest payable relating to the convertible debenture as at June 30, 2015 was $145,378 (December 31, 2014 - $70,721).


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

7.

Related Party Transactions – Continued


(iii)

Notes Payable

On January 1, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement to secure a $10,000,000 loan (the “January Loan”). The January Loan was provided by members of the Clay family, who are shareholders of the Company, including $7,500,000 provided by an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company. The January Loan had a twelve-month term and an annual interest rate of 5%, payable on the maturity date.

The January Loan was repaid on a date that is less than 183 days before the maturity date. As a result, the Company paid the Lenders an additional charge in the amount that is equivalent to 5% of the principal amount, plus interest on the principal amount at the rate of 5% per annum accrued to the date the January Loan was repaid. The Company repaid $7,500,000 loan plus the $375,000 accrued interest and $375,000 additional charge on December 31, 2014. The remaining balance of the loan, $2,500,000, the accrued interest of $125,000 and the additional charge of $125,000, were paid on January 5, 2015. In total, the Company incurred $500,000 in interest expense and $500,000 in additional charge related to the January Loan.

On December 31, 2014 the Company also entered into a new loan (the “December Loan”) with the same parties for an amount of $12,500,000. The December Loan is due on demand on July 1, 2015 and bears an annual interest rate of 10% payable at the end of each quarter. The loan is guaranteed by GQM Holdings, and secured by a pledge of the Company's interests in GQM Canada, GQM Canada’s interest in GQM Holdings and GQM Holdings' 50% interest in GQM LLC. The Company also incurred a closing fee to secure the loan in the amount of $1,000,000, of which, $750,000 was paid on December 31, 2014 and the remaining $250,000 was paid on January 5, 2015. The Company agreed to pay the legal fees incurred by the lenders relating to this instrument which amounted to $90,916. The total legal fees paid for the transaction were $118,695. The Company also agreed to provide the lenders with the option for certain registration rights whereby the Company would bear the costs and responsibility of registering the lenders common shares for the purposes of disposition subsequent to July 1, 2015. The Company has determined it is unlikely the registration option would be exercised and therefore has not accrued any potential costs related to the registration of the common shares. The Company has presented these transaction costs as a contra liability as substantially all of these costs were paid to the lenders.

On June 8, 2015, the Company amended the December Loan to extend the maturity to December 8, 2016 and increasing the principal amount from $12,500,000 to $37,500,000 (the “June 2015 Loan”). The Company also issued 10,000,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable for a period of five years expiring June 8, 2020. The common share purchase warrants have an exercise price of $0.95. All other terms remained the same as the December Loan. The Company also incurred a closing fee to secure the loan in the amount of $1,500,000, all of which was paid on June 8, 2015. The Company agreed to pay the legal fees incurred by the lenders relating to this instrument which amounted to $46,408. The legal fees were expensed as the transaction met the definition of a debt extinguishment. The terms of the registration rights remains unchanged as does the Company’s assessment of the likelihood of the registration rights being exercised. As such, as of June 30, 2015, no accrual has been made for the potential costs related to the registration rights.

  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Balance, beginning of the period$ 13,881,305 $ - 
Fair value at inception 33,497,277  22,500,000 
Repayment of loans (2,500,000) (7,500,000)
Amortization of closing and legal fees 967,156  - 
Amortization of discount on the June Loan 143,069  - 
Extinguishment of the December Loan (12,500,000) - 
Loss on extinguishment of debt 151,539  - 
Capitalized closing fee and legal fees -  (1,118,695)
Balance, end of the period$ 33,640,346 $ 13,881,305 

Interest payable relating to the June 2015 Loan as at June 30, 2015 was $229,167 (December 31, 2014 - $250,000 – of which $125,000 was interest expense and $125,000 related to the additional charge for the January Loan).


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

7.

Related Party Transactions – Continued


(iv)

Share Purchase Warrants

On June 8, 2015 the Company issued 10,000,000 share purchase warrants to the Clay family in connection with the June 2015 Loan. The share purchase warrants are exercisable until June 8, 2020 at an exercise price of $0.95. Included in the June 2015 Loan agreement was an anti-dilution provision. If the Company were to complete a financing at a share price lower than the exercise price of the share purchase warrants, the exercise price of the share purchase warrants would be adjusted to match the price at which the financing was completed.

The share purchase warrants meet the definition of a derivative liability instrument as the exercise price is not a fixed price as described above. Therefore, the conversionsettlement feature does not meet the “fixed-for-fixed” criteria outlined in ASC 815-40-15.

  
As a result, the conversion feature of the notes is required to be recorded as a derivative liability recorded at fair value and marked-to-market each period with the changes in fair value each period being charged or credited to income or loss.

The fair value of the derivative liability related to the conversion featureshare purchase warrants as at March 31,June 30, 2015 is $1,931,519$3,352,979 (December 31, 2014 - $1,829,770)$Nil). The derivative liability was calculated using an acceptable option pricing valuation model with the following assumptions:


   2015  2014 
 Risk-free interest rate 0.50%  1.00% - 1.09% 
 Expected life of derivative liability 0.32 years  0.57 - 1.32 years 
 Expected volatility 77.00%  73.03 - 98.21% 
 Dividend rate 0.00%  0.00% 

The changes in the derivative liability related to the conversion feature are as follows:

   March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
        
 Balance, beginning of the period$ 1,829,770 $ 2,833,987 
 Change in fair value of derivative liability including
    foreign exchange
 101,749  (1,004,217)
 Balance, end of the period$ 1,931,519 $ 1,829,770 
 20152014
Risk-free interest rate0.81% - 1.02%-
Expected life of derivative liability4.94 - 5 years-
Expected volatility72.29% - 72.52%-
Dividend rate0.00%-

The change in the convertible debenturesderivative share purchase warrants is as follows:

   March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
 Balance, beginning of the period$ 6,649,967 $ 4,642,620 
 Discounted convertible debentures -  - 
 Amortization of discount 747,870  2,510,611 
 Foreign exchange (574,344) (503,264)
 Balance, end of the period$ 6,823,493 $ 6,649,967 


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

7. Related Party Transactions – Continued

(ii)

Convertible Debentures - Continued

  June 30, 2015

During the three months ended March 31, 2015, in addition to the amortization of the discount on the convertible debenture, the Company incurred interest expense of $40,285 (Three months ended March 31, 2014 - $45,717) based on the 2% per annum stated interest rate for a total amortization of discount and interest expense of $788,155 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (Three months ended March 31, 2014 - $566,297). Interest payable relating to the convertible debenture as at March 31, 2015 was $104,248 (December 31, 2014 - $70,721).

  December 31, 2014 
Balance, beginning of the period(iii)$

Notes Payable

 -
$ -
Fair value at inception4,002,723  

On January 1, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement to secure a $10,000,000 loan (the “January Loan”). The January Loan was provided by members of the Clay family, who are shareholders of the Company, including $7,500,000 provided by an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company. The January Loan had a twelve-month term and an annual interest rate of 5%, payable on the maturity date.

- 

The January Loan was repaid on a date that is less than 183 days before the maturity date. As a result, the Company paid the Lenders an additional chargeChange in the amount that is equivalent to 5% of the principal amount, plus interest on the principal amount at the rate of 5% per annum accrued to the date the January Loan was repaid. The Company repaid $7,500,000 loan plus the $375,000 accrued interest and $375,000 additional charge on December 31, 2014. The remaining balance of the loan, $2,500,000, the accrued interest of $125,000 and the additional charge of $125,000, were paid on January 5, 2015. In total, the Company incurred $500,000 in interest expense and $500,000 in additional charge related to the January Loan.

fair value
 (649,744)- 

On December 31, 2014 the Company also entered into a new loan (the “December Loan”) with the same parties for an amount of $12,500,000. The December Loan is due on demand on July 1, 2015 and bears an annual interest rate of 10% payable at theBalance, end of each quarter. The loan is guaranteed by GQM Holdings, and secured by a pledge of the Company's interests in GQM Canada, GQM Canada’s interest in GQM Holdings and GQM Holdings' 50% interest in GQM LLC. The Company also incurred a closing fee to secure the loan in the amount of $1,000,000, of which, $750,000 was paid on December 31, 2014 and the remaining $250,000 was paid on January 5, 2015. The Company agreed to pay the legal fees incurred by the lenders relating to this instrument which amounted to $90,916. The total legal fees paid for the transaction were $118,695. The Company has presented these transaction costs as a contra liability as substantially all of these costs were paid to the lenders.

period

   March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
 Balance, beginning of the period$ 13,881,305 $ - 
 Proceeds from loans -  22,500,000 
 Repayment of loans (2,500,000) (7,500,000)
 Amortization of closing and legal fees 536,729  - 
 Capitalized closing fee and legal fees -  (1,118,695)
 Balance, end of the period$ 11,918,034 $ 13,881,305 


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

7. Related Party Transactions – Continued

$ 3,352,979 (iv)$ -

(v)

Advance

  

In July 2014, GQM Inc. entered into a $10,000,000 short-term advance agreement (the “Advance”) with Leucadia and Auvergne (the(collectively, the “Lenders”), with the Company as guarantor. Leucadia provided $6,500,000 of the loan and Auvergne provided $3,500,000. The Advance had an interest rate of 10.0% per annum, compounded monthly. Auvergne is an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company. On closing of the joint venture transactionJoint Venture Transaction on September 15, 2014, GQM LLC applied part of the investment of $110,000,000 to repayment of principal and accrued interest on the $10,000,000 bridge loan advanced by the Lenders in July 2014. GQM LLC paid $209,607 in interest payment, including $73,632 paid to Auvergne on the July 2014 Advance, of which $45,264 was capitalized to mineral property interests.



GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

7.

Related Party Transactions – Continued


(v)(vi)

Amortization of Discounts and Interest Expense

  

The following table summarizes the amortization of discountdiscounts and interest on loanloans and convertible debentures as at March 31, 2015 and as at March 31, 2014.debentures:


   March 31, 2015  March 31, 2014 
        
 Interest expense related to the convertible debentures$ 40,285 $ 45,717 
 Interest expense related to the notes payable 311,644  125,000 
 Interest expense related to Komatsu Financial loans 13,411  - 
 Amortization of the convertible debentures 747,870  520,580 
 Amortization of the December 2014 loan closing fees 536,729  - 
        
 Amortization of discount and interest on loan and
convertible debentures
$ 1,649,939 $ 691,297 
  Three Months  Three Months  Six Months  Six Months 
  Ended  Ended  Ended  Ended 
  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014 
Interest expense related to the convertible debentures$ 40,301 $ 45,799 $ 80,586 $ 91,516 
Interest expense related to the January 2014 loans -  616,096  -  741,096 
Interest expense related to the December 2014 loans 236,301  -  547,945  - 
Interest expense related to the June 2015 loans 229,167  -  229,167  - 
Interest expense related to Komatsu Financial loans 31,146  -  44,558  - 
Amortization of debt discount on the convertible debentures 842,681  593,038  1,590,551  1,113,618 
Amortization of the December 2014 loan closing fees 430,427  -  967,155  - 
Amortization of the June 2015 loan discount 143,069  -  143,069  - 
Amortization of discount and interest on loan and convertible debentures$ 1,953,092 $ 1,254,933 $ 3,603,031 $ 1,946,230 

The Company’s loans were contracted to fund significant development costs. The Company capitalizes a portion of the interest expense as it related to funds borrowed to complete development activities at the Project site.

   March 31, 2015  March 31, 2014 
        
 Amortization of discounts and interest on loan,   
    advance and convertible debenture
$ 1,649,939 $ 691,297 
 Less: Interest costs capitalized (702,186) - 
Amortization of discounts and interest
expensed
$947,753$691,297
  Three Months  Three Months  Six Months  Six Months 
  Ended  Ended  Ended  Ended 
  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014 
Amortization of discounts and interest on loan, advance and convertible debenture$ 1,953,092 $ 1,254,933 $ 3,603,031 $ 1,946,230 
Less: Interest costs capitalized (882,983) (990,813) (1,585,167) (990,813)
Amortization of discounts and interest expensed$ 1,070,111 $ 264,120 $ 2,017,864 $ 955,417 

(vii)

(vi)Joint Venture Transaction

On September 15, 2014, the Company closed the JV with Gauss resulting in both parties owning a 50% interest in the Project. Pursuant to the JV, Golden Queen converted its wholly-owned subsidiary GQM Inc., the entity developing the Project, into a California limited liability company named GQM LLC. On closing of the transaction, Gauss acquired 50% of GQM LLC by investing $110 million cash in exchange for newly issued membership units of GQM LLC. GQ Holdings, a newly incorporated subsidiary of the Company, holds the other 50% of GQM LLC.

Gauss is a funding vehicle owned by entities controlled by Leucadia National Corporation (NYSE: LUK) (“Leucadia”) and certain members of the Clay family, a shareholder group which collectively owned approximately 27% of the issued and outstanding shares of Golden Queen (the “Clay Group”) at the time of the transaction. Gauss is owned 67.5% by Gauss Holdings LLC (“Gauss Holdings”, Leucadia’s investment entity) and 32.5% by Auvergne LLC (“Auvergne”, the Clay Group’s investment entity). Pursuant to the transaction, Leucadia was paid a transaction fee of $2,000,000 and $275,000 was paid to Auvergne through GQM LLC. The Company has adopted an accounting policy of expensing these transaction costs.

On September 15, 2014, the Company closed the Joint Venture Transaction with Gauss resulting in both parties owning a 50% interest in the Project. Pursuant to the Joint Venture Transaction, Golden Queen converted its wholly-owned subsidiary GQM Inc., the entity developing the Project, into a California limited liability company named GQM LLC. On closing of the transaction, Gauss acquired 50% of GQM LLC by investing $110 million cash in exchange for newly issued membership units of GQM LLC. GQ Holdings, a newly incorporated subsidiary of the Company, holds the other 50% of GQM LLC.



GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

7.

7. Related Party Transactions – Continued


(vi)(vii)

Joint Venture Transaction - Continued

  

Gauss is a funding vehicle owned by entities controlled by Leucadia National Corporation (NYSE: LUK) (“Leucadia”) and certain members of the Clay family, a shareholder group which collectively owned approximately 27% of the issued and outstanding shares of Golden Queen (the “Clay Group”) at the time of the transaction. Gauss is owned 67.5% by Gauss Holdings LLC (“Gauss Holdings”, Leucadia’s investment entity) and 32.5% by Auvergne LLC (“Auvergne”, the Clay Group’s investment entity). Pursuant to the transaction, Leucadia was paid a transaction fee of $2,000,000 and $275,000 was paid to Auvergne through GQM LLC. The Company has adopted an accounting policy of expensing these transaction costs.

 

Variable Interest Entity

  

In accordance with ASC 810-10-30, the Company has determined that GQM LLC meets the definition of a VIE and that the Company is part of a related party group that, in its entirety, would meet the definition of a primary beneficiary. Although no individual variable interest holder individually meets the definition of a primary beneficiary in the absence of the related party group, Golden Queen has determined it is considered the member of the related party group most closely associated with GQM LLC. As a result, the Company has consolidated 100% of the accounts of GQM LLC in these consolidated financial statements, while presenting a non-controlling interest portion representing the 50% interest of Gauss in GQM LLC on its balance sheet. A portion of the non-controlling interest has been presented as temporary equity on the Company’s balance sheet representing the initial value of the non-controlling interest that could potentially be redeemable by Gauss in the future. The net assets of GQM LLC as of March 31,June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows:


   March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
 Assets, GQM LLC$ 123,774,153 $ 118,937,371 
 Liabilities, GQM LLC (10,179,339) (4,769,144)
 Net assets, GQM LLC$ 113,594,814 $ 114,168,227 
  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Assets, GQM LLC$ 79,517,574 $ 118,937,371 
Liabilities, GQM LLC (14,690,770) (4,769,144)
Net assets, GQM LLC$ 64,826,804 $ 114,168,227 

Included in the assets above, is $64,508,799$71,275,286 (December 31, 2014 - $83,282,403) in cash held as at March 31,June 30, 2015. The cash in GQM LLC is directed specifically to fund capital expenditures required to take the Project to production and settle GQM LLC’s obligations. The liabilities of GQM LLC do not have recourse to the general credit of the primary beneficiary.

Non-Controlling Interest

In accordance with ASC 810, the Company has presented Gauss’ ownership in GQM LLC as a non-controlling interest amount on the balance sheet within the equity section. However, the Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement (“LLC Agreement”) contains terms within Section 12.5 that provides for the exit from the investment in GQM LLC for an initial member whose interest in GQM LLC becomes less than 20%. The following is a summary of the terms of the clause:

Pursuant to Section 12.5, if a member becomes less than a 20% interest holder, its remaining unit interest will (ultimately) be terminated through one of three events at the non-diluted member’s option within 60 days of the diluted member’s interest dropping below 20% (the “triggering event”):

 a.

Through conversion to a net smelter royalty (“NSR”) (in which case the conversion ratio is based on a pro rata percentage, determined on a linear basis, based on the following: 0-20% membership interest translates to 0-5% NSR) obligation of GQM LLC;

 b.

Through a buy-out (at fair value) by the non-diluted member; or

 c.

Through a sale process by which the diluted member’s interest is sold


If such sales process does not result in a binding offer acceptable to the non-diluted

If such sale process does not result in a binding offer acceptable to the non- diluted member within six months after the election by the non-diluted member, the sale process terminates and the non-diluted member has 15 days to choose between (a) and (b).

If the non-diluted member, does not make an election pursuantthe sale process terminates and the non-diluted member has 15 days to the above within 60 days, the diluted member may choose between (a) orand (b) above. If no election is made by the diluted member, option (a) is deemed to have been elected..

This clause in the JV constitutes contingent redeemable equity as outlined in Accounting Series Release No. 268 (“ASR 268”) and has been classified as temporary equity.



GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

7.

7. Related Party Transactions – Continued


(vi)(vii)

Joint Venture Transaction - Continued

  

Non-Controlling Interest - Continued

  

If the non-diluted member does not make an election pursuant to the above within 60 days, the diluted member may choose (a) or (b) above. If no election is made by the diluted member, option (a) is deemed to have been elected.

 

This clause in the Joint Venture Transaction constitutes contingent redeemable equity as outlined in Accounting Series Release No. 268 (“ASR 268”) and has been classified as temporary equity.

On initial recognition the amount of the temporary equity is calculated using the guidance that specifies that the initial measurement of redeemable instruments should be the carrying value. The amount allocated to temporary equity and the permanent equity on initial recognition is shown below. Temporary equity represents the amount of redeemable equity within Gauss’ ownership interest in the net assets of GQM LLC. The remaining 60% of their interest is considered permanent equity as it is not redeemable.


  September 15, 2014 
Net assets, GQM LLC before JVJoint Venture Transaction$ 16,973,184 
Investment by Gauss 110,000,000 
Net assets, GQM LLC after JVJoint Venture Transaction 126,973,184 
Gauss’ ownership percentage 50% 
Net assets of GQM LLC attributable to Gauss$ 63,486,592 
    
Allocation of non-controlling interest between permanent
equity and temporary equity:
  
 
Permanent non-controlling interest (60% of total non-
controlling interest)
$ 38,091,955 
Temporary non-controlling interest (40% of total non-
controlling interest)
$ 25,394,637 

Subsequent to the initial transaction, the carrying value of the non-controlling interest will be adjusted for net income and loss, distributions and distributionscontributions pursuant to ASC 810-10 based on the same percentage allocation used to calculate the initial book value of temporary equity.

   March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
 Net and comprehensive loss in GQM LLC$ (573,413)$ (2,804,957)
 Non-controlling interest percentage 50%  50% 
 Net and comprehensive loss attributable to non-
  controlling interest
 (286,706) (1,402,479)
 Net and comprehensive loss attributable to
   permanent non-controlling interest
$ (172,024)$ (841,487)
 Net and comprehensive loss attributable to      
    temporary non-controlling interest$ (114,682)$ (560,992)
  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Net and comprehensive loss in GQM LLC$ (1,998,148)$ (2,804,957)
Non-controlling interest percentage 50%  50% 
Net and comprehensive loss attributable to non- controlling interest (999,074) (1,402,479)
Net and comprehensive loss attributable to permanent non-controlling interest$ (599,445)$ (841,487)
Net and comprehensive loss attributable to temporary non-controlling interest$ (399,629)$ (560,992)


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

7. Related Party Transactions – Continued

7.  (vi)RelatedPartyTransactions –Continued

(vii)

Joint Venture Transaction - Continued

  

Non-Controlling Interest - Continued


   Permanent Non-  Temporary Non- 
   Controlling Interest  Controlling Interest 
        
Carrying value of non-controlling interest,
December 31, 2014
$34,250,468$22,833,645
 Net and comprehensive loss for the period (172,024) (114,682)
Carrying value of non-controlling interest ,
March 31, 2015
$34,078,444$22,718,963
  Permanent Non-  Temporary Non- 
  Controlling Interest  Controlling Interest 
Carrying value of non-controlling interest, December 31, 2014$ 34,250,468 $ 22,833,645 
Capital contribution 7,500,000  5,000,000 
Net and comprehensive loss for the period (599,445) (399,629)
Carrying value of non-controlling interest , June 30, 2015$ 41,151,023 $ 27,434,016 

   Permanent Non-  Temporary Non- 
   Controlling Interest  Controlling Interest 
        
Carrying value of non-controlling interest,
September 15, 2014
$38,091,955$25,394,637
 Distributions to non-controlling interests (3,000,000) (2,000,000)
 Net and comprehensive loss for the period (841,487) (560,992)
Carrying value of non-controlling interest ,
December 31, 2014
$34,250,468$22,833,645
  Permanent Non-  Temporary Non- 
  Controlling Interest  Controlling Interest 
Carrying value of non-controlling interest, September 15, 2014$ 38,091,955 $ 25,394,637 
Distributions to non-controlling interest (3,000,000) (2,000,000)
Net and comprehensive loss for the period (841,487) (560,992)
Carrying value of non-controlling interest , December 31, 2014$ 34,250,468 $ 22,833,645 

Dilution of Interest in Subsidiary

As a result of the JV transaction,Joint Venture Transaction, the Company’s interest in GQM LLC was diluted from 100% to 50% and ordinarily, the Company would recognize a charge on dilution. However, since the transaction was with a related party and the Company retained control, the excess has not been recognized in net income but rather has been recorded in equity as an increase to APIC based on guidance provided in ASC 810-10-55-4D and -4E.

  September 15, 2014 
Investment by Gauss$ 110,000,000 
Less:   
Initial carrying value of permanent equity (38,091,955)
Initial carrying value of temporary equity (25,394,637)
Effect of dilution of subsidiary recorded to APIC$ 46,513,408 

Management Agreement

GQM LLC is managed by a board of managers comprising an equal number of representatives of each of Gauss and GQ Holdings. The initial officers of GQM LLC arewere H. Lutz Klingmann as Chief Executive Officer, and Andrée St-Germain as Chief Financial Officer. Subsequent to June 30, 2015, the President of GQM LLC was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer of GQM LLC. A director of the Company was appointed to the GQM LLC Board of Managers as a nominee of the Company, replacing Mr. Klingmann. As long as a member of the Clay family holds greater that 25% of the Company, the Clay Group is entitled to appoint one of the Company’s representatives to the GQM LLC board of managers.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

7.

7. Related Party Transactions – Continued


(vi)(vii)

Joint Venture Transaction - Continued

  

Capital Contribution Agreement

Pursuant to the Joint Venture Transaction, GQ Holdings’ made a single capital contribution to GQM LLC of $12.5 million on June 15, 2015. Gauss funded an amount equal to GQM Holdings’ capital contribution to GQM LLC, and the aggregate amount of $25 million is anticipated to provide GQM LLC with the necessary funds to fully develop the Project. Both partners will maintain their 50% ownership of the Project.

Standby Commitment

Golden Queen also entered into a backstop guarantee agreement with Gauss (the “Backstop Agreement”) whereby, if the Company conducts a rights offering, Gauss has agreed to purchase, upon the terms set forth in the Backstop Agreement, any common shares which have not been acquired pursuant to the exercise of rights under the Rights Offering at a purchase price to be determined but not to exceed $1.10 per common share, up to a maximum amount of $45 million in the aggregate. In consideration for entering into the Backstop Agreement, on closing of the Joint Venture, the Company paid Leucadia and Auvergne a standby guarantee fee of $2,250,000, of which $731,250 was paid to Auvergne.

The Transaction Agreement and Backstop Agreement contemplated that the Company would file a registration statement in connection with the rights offering by October 15, 2014. The Company has decided not to proceed with a rights offering, and as a result the standby commitment has expired.

8.

Pursuant to the JV, GQ Holdings will have the right to make a single capital contribution to GQM LLCSupplementary Disclosures of between $15 million and $25 million (the “Top-Up Contribution”), with each such threshold to be reduced by 50% of the amount of any proceeds received by GQM LLC from any debt financing transaction. Pursuant to the JV Agreement, if the Company (through GQ Holdings) makes the Top-Up Contribution, Gauss is committed to fund an amount equal to the Top-Up Contribution to GQM LLC, and the aggregate amount of such contributions are anticipated to provide GQM LLC with the necessary funds to fully develop the Project. If the Company does not make the Top-Up Contribution, Gauss will be obligated to make up to a $40 million capital contribution to GQM LLC, in which case GQ Holdings’ ownership interest in GQM LLC will be diluted and GQ Holdings will surrender one of its board seats in GQM LLC. If Gauss makes the $40 million capital contribution, the Company will need to reassess whether the resulting dilution of its interest in the JV affects the accounting treatment of the variable interest entity and if consolidation of GQM LLC is still appropriate.

Standby CommitmentCash Flow Information

Golden Queen also entered into a backstop guarantee agreement with Gauss (the “Backstop Agreement”) whereby, if the Company conducts a rights offering, Gauss has agreed to purchase, upon the terms set forth in the Backstop Agreement, any common shares which have not been acquired pursuant to the exercise of rights under the Rights Offering at a purchase price to be determined but not to exceed $1.10 per common share, up to a maximum amount of $45 million in the aggregate. In consideration for entering into the Backstop Agreement, on closing of the Joint Venture, the Company paid Leucadia and Auvergne a standby guarantee fee of $2,250,000, of which $731,250 was paid to Auvergne.

The Transaction Agreement and Backstop Agreement contemplated that the Company would file a registration statement in connection with the rights offering by October 15, 2014, however, the Company is conducting a full review of available financing alternatives, and as a result, whether the Company will proceed with a possible rights offering (if any), and the size of any such rights offering, is not known at this time. The Company will not be subject to additional fees or expenses as a result of not filing a registration statement in connection with a rights offering.

8. Supplementary Disclosures of Cash Flow Information

 March 31, 2015  March 31, 2014  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014 
Cash paid during period for:            
Interest$ 260,498 $ - $ 589,553 $ - 
Income taxes$ - $ - $ - $ - 
Non-cash financing and investing activities:            
Stock-based compensation$ - $ 96,074 $ - $ 192,148 
Common shares issued as part of a management agreement$ 151,428 $ - $ 151,428 $ - 
Common shares issued for mineral property$ - $ 24,480 $ - $ 24,480 
Mineral property acquired through issuance of debt$ 2,865,983 $ - $ 4,377,970 $ - 
Mineral property expenditures included in accounts payable$ 5,521,461 $ 1,256,040 $ 7,658,456 $ 228,071 
Non-cash interest cost capitalized to mineral property interests$ 702,186 $ - $ 1,585,167 $ 990,813 
Non-cash amortization of discount and interest expense$ 934,342 $ 691,297 $ 1,973,307 $ 955,417 




GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

9. Earnings (Loss) Per Share

  Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 2015  March 31, 2014 
Numerator:      
Net income (loss) – numerator for basic EPS$ (1,436,187)$ (7,494,638)
Amortization of discount -  - 
Change in derivative liability – Convertible
   debentures
--
Numerator for diluted EPS$ (1,436,187)$ (7,494,638)
9.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

  Three Months    Three Months    Three Months    Three Months   
  Ended    Ended    Ended    Ended   
  June 30, 2015    June 30, 2014    June 30, 2015    June 30, 2014   
Numerator:            
Net income (loss) –            
numerator for basic EPS$ (1,379,265)$ (705,843)$ (2,815,451)$ (8,200,482)
Amortization of discount -  -  -  - 
Change in derivative liability – Convertible debentures -  (1,634,681) -  - 
Change in derivative – Warrants -  -  -  - 
             
Numerator for diluted EPS$ (1,379,265)$ (2,340,524)$ (2,815,451)$ (8,200,482)

 Three Months  Three Months  Six Months  Six Months 
 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended  Ended  Ended  Ended  Ended 
 March 31, 2015  March 31, 2014  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014 
Denominator:                  
Denominator for basic EPS 99,785,350  99,260,653  99,928,683  99,619,562  99,857,412  99,441,099 
Effect of dilutive securities:                  
Employee stock options -  -  -  90,134  -  - 
Convertible debenture -  -  -  9,708,738  -  - 
Warrants -          
Denominator for diluted EPS 99,785,350  99,260,653  99,928,683  109,418,434  99,857,412  99,441,099 
                  
Basic income(loss) per share$ (0.01)$ (0.08)
Basic earnings(loss) per share$ (0.01)$ (0.01)$ (0.03)$ (0.08)
Diluted loss per share$ (0.01)$ (0.08)$ (0.01)$ (0.02)$ (0.03)$ (0.08)

For the three monthsmonth periods ended March 31,June 30, 2015 750,000 (March 31,and 2014, – 820,000)700,000 and 150,000 options were not included above as their impact would be anti-dilutive. For the six month periods ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, 700,000 and 850,000 options were not included above as their impact would be anti-dilutive.

For the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, 10,000,000 and Nil (Three and six months ended June 30, 2014 – Nil and Nil) warrants were not included above as their impact would be anti-dilutive.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and for the six months ended June 30, 2014, the convertible debentures were not included above as their impact would be anti-dilutive. The convertible debenture was included in the calculation for the three months ended June 30, 2014.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

10.

10. Loan Payable

The Company entered into fourseven financing agreements with Komatsu Financial during the period for two crawler dozers, and two articulated trucks.trucks, two excavators and a wheeled dozer. The agreements are as follows:

  March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 

Motor Grader – Acquired on December 5, 2014 for a total
purchase price of $291,146 including financing fees. The loan is
payable over 4 years and carries an annual interest rate of 1.80%
and a monthly payment of $5,268, principal and interest.
The Company made a down payment of $47,335.

$ 229,082 $ 243,811 

 

      

Water Wagon – Acquired on November 6, 2014 for a total
purchase price of $815,374 including financing fees. The loan is
payable over 4 years and carries an annual interest rate of 2.99%
and a monthly payment of $15,109, principal and interest. The
Company made a down payment of $132,646.

 628,897  669,321 

 

      

Crawler Dozer (Small) – Acquired on February 17, 2015 for a
total purchase price of $822,750 including financing fees. The
loan is payable over 4 years and carries an annual interest rate of
2.99% and a monthly payment of $15,245, principal and interest.
The Company made a down payment of $133,875.

 675,347  - 

 

      

Crawler Dozer (Large) – Acquired on March 20, 2015 for a total
purchase price of $1,364,725 including financing fees. The loan
is payable over 4 years and carries an annual interest rate of
2.99% and a monthly payment of $25,287, principal and interest.
The Company made a down payment of $222,075.

 1,142,,650  - 

 

      

Two Articulated Trucks – Acquired on February 17, 2015 for a
total purchase price of $671,944 each including financing fees.
The loans are payable over 4 years and carries an annual interest
rate of 2.99% and monthly payments of $12,451 each, principal
and interest. The Company made a down payments of $109,325
for each truck.

 1,103,139  - 

      

Total loan balance

 3,779,115  913,132 

Less: Current portion of loan

 (931,828) (222,839)

      

Loan payable – Long-term portion

$ 2,847,287 $ 690,293 
   June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Motor Grader – Acquired on December 5, 2014 for a total purchase price of $291,146 including financing fees. The loan is payable over 4 years and carries an annual interest rate of 1.80% and a monthly payment of $5,268, principal and interest. The Company made a down payment of $47,335. $ 214,286 $ 243,811 
        
Water Wagon – Acquired on November 6, 2014 for a total purchase price of $815,374 including financing fees. The loan is payable over 4 years and carries an annual interest rate of 2.99% and a monthly payment of $15,109, principal and interest. The Company made a down payment of $132,646.  588,171  669,321 
        
Crawler Dozer (Small) – Acquired on February 17, 2015 for a total purchase price of $822,750 including financing fees. The loan is payable over 4 years and carries an annual interest rate of 2.99% and a monthly payment of $15,245, principal and interest. The Company made a down payment of $133,875.  634,559  - 
        
Crawler Dozer (Large) – Acquired on March 20, 2015 for a total purchase price of $1,364,725 including financing fees. The loan is payable over 4 years and carries an annual interest rate of 2.99% and a monthly payment of $25,287, principal and interest. The Company made a down payment of $222,075.  1,075,163  - 
        
Two Articulated Trucks – Acquired on February 17, 2015 for a total purchase price of $671,944 each including financing fees. The loans are payable over 4 years and carries an annual interest rate of 2.99% and monthly payments of $12,451 each, principal and interest. The Company made a down payments of $109,325 for each truck.  1,036,515  - 
        
Two Excavators – Acquired on April 23, 2015 and June 26, 2015 for a total purchase price of $992,541 and 280,843 respectively, including financing fees. The loans are payable over 4 years and carry an annual interest rate of 2.99% and 0.00% and monthly payments of $18,391 and $4,900 each, principal and interest. The Company made down payments of $161,487 and $45,658 for each truck.  1,033,557  - 
        
Wheeled Dozer – Acquired on June 26, 2015 for a total purchase price of $846,575 including financing fees. The loan is payable over 4 years and carries an annual interest rate of 2.99% and monthly payments of $15,687, principal and interest. The Company made a down payments of $137,725 for each truck.  708,850  - 
        
Total loan balance  5,291,102  913,132 
Less: Current portion of loan  (1,347,120) (222,839)
        
Loan payable – Long-term portion $ 3,943,982 $ 690,293 

The loan agreements are secured by the underlying assets.


GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

11.

11. Financial Instruments

Fair Value Measurements

All financial assets and financial liabilities are recorded at fair value on initial recognition. Transaction costs are expensed when they are incurred, unless they are directly attributable to the acquisition of qualifying assets, in which case they are added to the costs of those assets until such time as the assets are substantially ready for their intended use or sale.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1

Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

 

Level 2

Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;See Note 7 (ii )–(ii) – Convertible Debentures and Note 7 (iv) – Share Purchase Warrants for derivatives fair valued on a recurring basis and considered within level 2.The2. The fair value measurement of these financial instruments use observable inputs in option price models such as the binomial and the black- scholesblack-scholes valuation models.

 

Level 3

Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

Under fair value accounting, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. As of March 31,June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had embedded derivative liabilities in connection with the Convertible Debenture (Note 7(ii)) and the warrants issued to the Clay family (Note 7 (iv)).

12. General and Administrative Costs
12.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative costsexpenses are broken down as follows:

 Three Months Ended  Three Months Ended  Three Months  Three Months  Six Months  Six Months 
 March 31, 2015  March 31, 2014  Ended  Ended  Ended  Ended 
       June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014 
Audit & Accounting$ 95,386 $ 107,027 $ 275,368 $ 264,521 
Legal$ 245,922 $ 389,830  369,400  538,926  615,322  928,756 
Consulting fees (Note 4) 188,934  73,514 
Audit and accounting 179,983  157,494 
Office and miscellaneous 167,540  132,603 
Consulting fees 12,378  40,235  201,312  113,749 
Corporate salary 151,430  121,078  603,418  266,677  754,848  387,755 
Feasibility study 108,542  - 
Corporate expense 42,670  466,079  86,919  637,663 
Office 221,185  241,754  488,523  374,358 
Insurance 72,713  28,025  135,902  41,908 
Regulatory and licensing 65,486  45,237  45,468  26,220  110,954  71,457 
Insurance 63,189  13,883 
Environmental matters 56,720  17,093  56,720  17,093 
Foreign exchange 94,424  196,168  (467,088) 21,532 
Stock-based compensation -  96,074  -  192,148 
Pre-production costs 56,666  -  354,840  -  420,250  - 
Corporate expense 44,249  171,584 
Public relations & promotion 29,104  38,596  22,613  57,672  51,717  96,268 
Stock-based compensation -  96,074 
Foreign exchange loss/(gain) (561,512) (174,636)
                  
Total General and Administrative Costs$ 739,533 $ 1,065,257 
Total$ 1,991,215 $ 2,081,950 $ 2,730,747 $ 3,147,208 

13.

Comparative Figures

Certain comparative figures have been reclassified to conform with the financial statement presentation adopted for the current year.



GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Interim Financial Statements
For the ThreeSix Months Ended March 31,June 30, 2015
(Unaudited - US dollars)

14.

13. Subsequent Events

Subsequent to March 31,June 30, 2015, mobile mining equipment was delivered to site.GQM LLC took possession of two loaders and four 100 ton haul trucks, valued at $9.6 million. Shortly after receivingtaking possession of the equipment, the Company paid $0.6 million in sales tax. The 10% deposit of $0.9 million had already been paid during the second quarter of 2015. The remaining $8.1 million will be financed over 48 months at an interest rate of 4.24%.

Subsequent to June 30, 2015, GQM LLC took possession of a dozer, valued at $0.2 million, which representedmillion. Shortly after taking possession of the equipment, the Company paid $17,550 in sales tax and made a 10% deposit.deposit of $23,400. The remaining $0.8$0.2 million will be financed over 48 months at an interest rate of 2.99%.

In addition, four mining trucksOn July 24, 2015, the Company repaid its C$10.0 million ($7.7 million) convertible debenture and two loaders were deliveredaccrued interest of C$200,000 ($153,500).

On August 10, 2015, the President and assembled on site in April.Chief Executive Officer of the Company stepped down. The current Chairman of the Company assumed the role of Interim Chief Executive Officer. The Company paidalso appointed the President and Chief Executive Officer of GQM LLC to the position of Chief Operating Officer. The Company and the former President and Chief Executive Officer entered into a 10% depositseparation agreement as of $0.9 million in April and expects to financeAugust 10, 2015, which provides for the remaining purchase price when it officially takes possessiontermination of the equipment later this year.employment agreement and an agreement for the Company to pay six month’s salary commencing from the date of termination. The separation agreement also confirms that as a result of the termination of the employment agreement, the 150,000 bonus shares that were to be issued upon reaching the commencement of production, will no longer be issuable as that milestone was not met as at the date of termination of the employment agreement.


Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

The following discussion of the operating results and financial condition of Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. (“Golden Queen”, “Company”, “we”, “our” or the “Company”“us”) is as at May 11,August 10, 2015 and should be read in conjunction with the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements of the Company for the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2015 and the notes thereto.

The information in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and all amounts herein are in U.S. dollars unless otherwise noted.

The Soledad Mountain Project

Overview

The Company is developing a gold-silver, open pit, heap leach operation on its fully-permitted Soledad Mountain property, located just outside the town of Mojave in Kern County in southern California. The Soledad Mountain Project (the “Project”) will use conventional open pit mining methods and the cyanide heap leach and Merrill-Crowe processes to recover gold and silver from crushed, agglomerated ore.

The Company closed a joint venture transaction (the “Joint Venture Transaction”) with Gauss LLC (“Gauss”) pursuant to which it sold 50% of its ownership in the Project for an investment of $110 million in September 2014. Gauss is a funding vehicle owned by entities controlled by Leucadia National Corporation (NYSE: LUK) (“Leucadia”) and certain members of the Clay family, a shareholder group which, at the time of the Joint Venture Transaction, collectively owned approximately 27% of the issued and outstanding shares of Golden Queen (the “Clay Group”). Gauss is owned 67.5% by Gauss Holdings LLC (“Gauss Holdings”, Leucadia’s investment entity) and 32.5% by Auvergne LLC (the(“Auvergne”, the Clay Group’s investment entity).

Golden Queen Mining Co., Inc. (“GQM Inc.”), a California corporation and the wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, was converted into a limited liability company, Golden Queen Mining Company, LLC (“GQM LLC”) on September 10, 2014 in preparation for the formation of the Joint Venture Transaction.Venture. Golden Queen Mining Holdings (“GQ Holdings”), the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, now owns a 50% interest in GQM LLC and Gauss holds the remaining 50%.

On June 15, 2015, GQ Holdings and Gauss LLC each made a single capital contribution of $12.5 million to GQM LLC, for an aggregate contribution of $25 million.

The Company started construction of infrastructure-related items during the third quarter of 2013 and expects commissioning of the processing facilities in late 2015.

Please refer to the Company’s Form 10-K dated March 16, 2015 for information on the Project and the Joint Venture Transaction.

Construction of Infrastructure and Project Facilities

Construction continuedprogressed on site and proceeded smoothly with no incidents to report during the firstsecond quarter and to date in the secondthird quarter of 2015.

The construction of the assay laboratory was completedequipped in March. Equipment has been purchasedJune and is being installed. We expect to have a fully operational laboratorycommissioned in mid-May;late July;

Construction of key footings for the crushing-screening plant is progressing well.has been completed. Construction of the “Fine Ore Bin” Hilfiker retaining wall as completed in July. Structural steel and equipment for the primary crusher section of the crushing-screening plant has been delivered;delivered and construction is underway;

Delivery of theThe high-pressure grinding roll or HPGR, the key comminution equipment in the crushing- screeningcrushing-screening plant, is expectedscheduled to be delivered to site in July;August;

The erection of the overland conveyor started in April. Equipmentsteel and equipment for the other components of the conveying and stacking system have been delivered. The assembly is being delivered on schedule;well underway;

3



Construction of the footings for the Merrill-Crowe plant is under wayhas been completed and deliveryerection of the Merrill-Crowe plant building is scheduled for June;progressing. Structural steel and equipment has been delivered;

Site grading of the Phase 1, Stage 1 heap-leach pad, the overflow pond and the solution conveyance channel has been completed. The lower, low permeability, clay-tailings layer has been placed in the overflow pond and the synthetic, impervious liner has been laid;

The lower, low permeability, clay-tailings layer is currently being placed on the Phase 1, Stage 1 heap leach pad;

3



A sub-contractor has mobilized a portable crushing-screening plant to site and this plant is being used to crush the overliner material for the Phase 1, Stage 1 heap leach pad;pad. The placement of the overliner is 80% completed at this time;

 

Construction of the power distribution and water supply infrastructure is 90%75% complete;

TwelveThere have been 16 pieces of Komatsu mobile mining equipment including four 100 ton haul trucks, two loaders, two 40 ton haul trucks, two excavators, four dozers, a water truck and a grader are nowdelivered on site and thismost of the equipment is currently being used in the mining operation;operations;

Road Machinery LLC, the Komatsu dealer in southern California, is developing a facility in Mojave to be able to provide maintenance support for the mobile mining equipment;

Robert C. Walish, Jr. was appointed to the position of President and Chief Executive Officer of GQM LLC. Mr. Walish was most recently the General Manager of the SCM Franke Operation of KGHM International, formerly QuadraFNX, located in northern Chile, where he was responsible for mining, processing and administration of a four million pound per month open-pit copper mining, heap-leach and SX-EW operation;

There are now 2332 full-time employees in Mojave with an expected increase to approximately 50 full-time employees in the near term. The management team is also in place. The contractors’ combined workforce varies from 50 to 75 depending upon the particular projects that are being worked on.

Please refer toCash used in Investing Activities below for further details on the work done on site.

February 2015 Technical Report and Updated Feasibility Study

The Company engaged Mine Development Associates (“MDA”) in 2014 to update the Project's geological model from first principles and to provide updated mineral resource estimates. The Company also engaged Norwest Corporation (“Norwest”) and Kappes, Cassiday & Associates (“KCA”) to update the mineral reserve estimates and prepare a feasibility study and economic analysis based upon current information. The updated mineral resource and reserve estimates and results of the feasibility study were disclosed in a news release on February 10, 2015. The Company filed a technical report pursuant to National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (“NI 43-101”) titled “Soledad Mountain Technical Report and Updated Feasibility Study” with an effective date of February 25, 2015 (the “Technical Report”) on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) on February 27, 2015 and with the U.S. Securities And Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on March 2, 2015. The Technical Report was prepared by Carl E. Defilippi of KCA, Sean Ennis of Norwest, Michael M. Gustin of MDA and Peter Ronning of New Caledonian Geological Consulting, each of whom areis a Qualified PersonsPerson and independent of the Company pursuant to NI 43-101.

The updated feasibility study highlights include :include:
(expressed on a 100% Basis)

Life of mine average annual production of 74k oz of gold and 781k oz of silver during full production Years 2-11;

Total production of 807k oz of gold and 8.3mm oz of silver;

Stripping ratio of 3.41:1 (waste tons : ore tons);

First quartile total cash costs net of by-products of $518/oz of gold (including royalties, California fees, property taxes, off-site refining charges and reclamation financial assurance) and of $558/oz of gold including sustaining capital costs;

Pre-production capital costs of approximately $144mm in-line with the capital costs update provided in March 2014: $99.3mm in pre-productionconstruction capital costs, $15mm contingency, $10.5mm in working capital and financial assurance cost estimate and $19.2mm for the mobile mining equipment. The mobile mining equipment is being financed through Komatsu Financial;

Base case after-tax net present value (5% discount rate) of $214mm with a gold price of $1,250/oz and a silver price of $17/oz; and

Base case after-tax IRR of 28.3% with a gold price of $1,250/oz and a silver price of $17/oz.

4


Please refer to the Company’s news release dated February 10, 2015 and Form 10-K dated March 16, 2015 for further details on the 2015 technical reportTechnical Report and updated feasibility study.

2015 Drill Program

The Company has completed an infill drill program within the first two phases of mining, which was announced in a news release dated March 16, 2015. Drilling started on February 9 and 4,400m of reverse-circulation drilling has been completed. A total of 3,334 samples was sent to a laboratory in Reno, Nevada. The main purpose of the drill program was to increase GQM LLC’s understanding of the North-West pit and Main pit Phase 1 mineralization. We will commence detailed mine planning for the first two phases of mining once the results have been analyzed.

4


The Center for Biodiversity Petition to List the Mojave Shoulderband Snail as an Endangered Species

On January 31, 2014, the Center for Biological Diversity (the “CBD”(“CBD”) filed an emergency petition (the "Petition") with the United States Fish and Wildlife Service ("USFWS") asking the USFWS to list the MojaveMohave Shoulderband snail as a threatened or endangered species. Citing a report published more than 80 years ago, the Petition claims that the snail exists in only three places, and that most of the snail habitat occurs on Soledad Mountain, where the Company is developing the Project.

The Company worked with its environmental and legal advisors to prepare a detailed response to the petition, which was filed with the USFWS on March 31, 2014. The Company’s response is available on the Company’s website at www.goldenqueen.com.

On April 22, 2014, the Company learned that the USFWS had determined that there is no emergency to justify listing the Mohave Shoulderband snail as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended. The USFWS reviewed the petition filed by the CBD and concluded that there was no imminent threat to the snail that would cause them to believe an emergency listing was required.

Even though an emergency listing was not warranted, the USFWS is required by the Endangered Species Act to continue processing the listing petition.Petition. On April 10, 2015, the USFWS announced the commencement of a 60-day public comment period as part of its decision to study the merits of the assertions made in the Petition. As of the date of August 10, no update has been provided. As the USFWS statesstated in its notice, taking this step does not mean that a listing will be justified at the end of the 12-month study period.

The Project has received all necessary regulatory approvals. The decision by the USFWS to proceed with a study does not affect the Project’s regulatory approvals or prevent the Project from moving forward.

Other Legal Matters

National Labor Relations Board

During the second quarter of 2014, the Company filed a complaint with the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB”) against the Building and Construction Trades Council of Kern, Inyo, and Mono Counties (the “Union”). The complaint was in response to action taken by the Union related to a 1997 project labor agreement (the “PLA”) that the Company believes is not applicable to the current Project and, in any event, unenforceable under federal labor law.

The NLRB informed the Company that the NLRB’s General Counsel had found in favor of the Company in the above matter in early October 2014. The NLRB has issued a Complaintcomplaint against the Union with the NLRB in the role of prosecutor. In the case the NLRB Region 31 will be acting as a representative of the NLRB General Counsel and will be prosecuting this unfair labor practice charge against the Union.

A Field Attorney for the NLRB reported that he had his first substantive conversation with legal counsel for the Union on December 4, 2014. The Field Attorney explored the possibility of a settlement whereby the Union would agree not to enforce the 1997 PLA. Legal counsel for the Union indicated that they were not interested in a settlement because the Unions believed that the PLA was lawful and enforceable. The Field Attorney then asked the Company’s legal counsel about the possibility of a “non-Board” settlement, meaning a settlement between the Company and the Union. Our legal counsel’s response was that we had made several attempts to settle this issue and a likelihood of a settlement at this point was low.

A hearing withbefore a United States Administrative Law Judge was held in Los Angeles from June 24 to June 26, 2015. The various parties that attended the NLRB originally scheduled for February 2,hearing are preparing briefs that are due to be submitted to the Judge on or before September 18th, 2015 has now been set for June 22, 2015.

Complaint on Alleged Short-swing Trading Profits

5


We received notice that a complaint was filed on April 22, 2015 in United States District Court, District of Massachusetts seeking recovery pursuant Section 16(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), of alleged short-swing trading profits. The complaint was filed by Ryan T. Darby, as plaintiff, and named Landon T. Clay, a shareholder of the Company (“Clay”), and the Company as defendants, anddefendants. The plaintiff alleges that Mr. Clay realized short-swing profits in connection with transactions in Company securities within a six month periods.months. There can be no assurance that the Company will receive any funds as a result of this suit. Although the Company is only a nominal defendant in this action, time and money may be required to resolve it. The Company is unable to predict the timing or outcome of this litigation. Each of Mr. Clay and the Company believes that the allegations are without merit and intend to vigorously defend against the claims.

5In conjunction with the June 2015 Loan, as defined elsewhere herein, the Company agreed to indemnify the Clay Group and their affiliates for up to $350,000 in legal expenses (not damages) incurred in defense of complaints brought against the lenders and their affiliates by shareholders of the Company under Section 16 of the Exchange Act. The legal fees reimbursed by the Company currently amount to $16,638. Please refer to theTransaction with Related Parties section for further details on the June 2015 Loan.


Results of Operations

The following are the results of operations for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, and the corresponding periodperiods ended March 31,June 30, 2014.

The Company had no revenue from operations.operations during the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.

The Company incurred general and administrative expenses of $739,533$1,991,215 and $2,730,747 during the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 as compared to $1,065,257$2,081,950 and $3,147,208 for the same periodperiods in 2014. Costs were lower by $325,724$90,735 and $416,461 for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 when compared with the same periodperiods in 2014. The reasons for the variance in costs are highlighted below.

The following significant general and administrative expenses were incurred during the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 with a comparison to costs incurred during the same period in 2014:

$245,922754,848 (2014 - $389,830)$387,755) for corporate salary. This increase is related to the addition of administrative personnel in Mojave as the Project is advancing towards production. Also included are 2014 bonuses for H. Lutz Klingmann, as CEO of the Company, and Andrée St-Germain, CFO of the Company, of C$45,000 and C$37,500, respectively. Corporate salary expenses also include a signing bonus for GQM LLC’s newly appointed President. The Company also started accruing for a construction bonus to be paid to employees upon successful completion of the construction and commissioning of the facilities.

$615,322 (2014 - $928,756) for legal expenses. The legal expenses for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2014 included significant legal costs related to the Joint Venture Transaction. The Company incurred minimal legal costs related to the Joint Venture Transaction during the six months ended June 30, 2015. The legal expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 also included significant legal costs related to the response to the Petition (please refer toThe Center forBiodiversity Petition to List the Mojave MohaveShoulderband Snail as an Endangered Speciesabove for further details). The Company incurred minimal legal costs related to the Petition during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

 

$188,934488,523 (2014 - $73,514)$374,358) for office expenses. The increase in office expenses in 2015 is mainly due to one-time costs related to the feasibility study completed during the first quarter of 2015.

$420,250 (2014 - $Nil) for pre-production expenses. The Company commenced pre-production mining activities in March 2015 and has incurred expenditures that were not previously incurred.

$201,312 (2014 - $113,749) for consulting fees. The increase is the result of the issuance of 150,000 bonus common shares valued at $151,428 to H. Lutz Klingmann, theas President of the Company, pursuant to his consulting service agreement. Please refer to theTransactions with Related Partiessection below for further details. On May 1, 2015 H. Lutz Klingmann became an employee of the Company, and since that date his salary is included under corporate salary expenses.

6



$135,902 (2014 - $41,908) for insurance expenses. The insurance expense increase is related to the general increase in corporate and site activities. Enhanced insurance coverage is required as the Project is advancing towards production.

 

$179,983 (2014 - $157,494) for audit, tax and accounting fees. The current period increase is the result of higher costs associated with the 2014 year-end audit completed in the first quarter of 2015. With the increase in overall corporate activity, the amount of work required to complete the financial statements audit and the internal control over financial reporting audit increased as compared to the prior period. The current period fees also include fees associated with the audit of the Company’s 50%-owned subsidiary GQM LLC.

$108,542110,954 (2014 - $Nil) for feasibility study costs. These expenses are one-time costs related to the feasibility study completed during the first quarter of 2015.

$167,540 (2014 - $132,603) for office expense. The Company incurred greater costs during the first quarter of 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014 due to costs related to an overall increase in activity on site, including items such as office supplies, computers and software, repairs and maintenance, operating supplies and travel, meals and accommodations.

$65,486 (2014 - $45,237)$71,457) for regulatory fees and licenses. The increase is due to an overall increase of corporate activities.

 

$63,189 (2014 - $13,883) for insurance expenses. The insurance expense increase is related to the general increase in corporate and site activities.

 

$56,666 (2014 - $Nil) for pre-production expenses. The Company commenced pre-production activities in March 2015 and has incurred expenditures that were not previously.

$44,24986,919 (2014 - $171,584)$637,663) for corporate expenses. The Company incurred significantly higher costs related to project financing during the first quarter ofsix months ended on June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2015. The Company also incurred significantly higher recruitment fees during the first quarter of 2014 as compared to the same period in 2015.

The following significant general and administrative expenses were incurred during the three month ended June 30, 2015 with a comparison to costs incurred during the same period in 2014:

$603,418 (2014 - $266,677) for corporate salary expenses. This increase is related to the addition of administrative personnel in Mojave as the Project is advancing towards production. Also included are 2014 bonuses for H. Lutz Klingmann, as CEO of the Company, and Andrée St-Germain, CFO of the Company, of C$45,000 and C$37,500, respectively. Corporate salary expenses also include a signing bonus for GQM LLC’s newly appointed President. The Company also started accruing for a construction bonus to be paid to employees upon successful completion of the construction and commissioning of the facilities.

$369,400 (2014 - $538,926) for legal expenses. The legal expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2014 included significant legal costs related to the Joint Venture Transaction. The Company incurred minimal legal costs related to the Joint Venture Transaction during the three months ended June 30, 2015.

$354,840 (2014 - $Nil) for pre-production mining expenses. The Company commenced pre-production mining activities in March 2015 and has incurred expenditures that were not previously incurred.

$221,185 (2014 - $241,754) for office expenses. The Company incurred greater costs during the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the same period in 2015 mostly due to costs related to opening the Mojave office in 2014, such as office supplies. This was partially off-set by an increase of general costs in 2015, such as vehicle expenses, resulting from an increase of activity in Mojave.

$72,713 (2014 - $28,025) for insurance expenses. The insurance expense increase is related to the general increase in corporate and site activities. Enhanced insurance coverage is required as the Project is advancing towards production.

$42,670 (2014 - $466,079) for corporate expenses. The corporate expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2014 included significant corporate expenses related to the Joint Venture Transaction. The Company did not incur corporate expenses related to the Joint Venture Transaction during the three months ended June 30, 2015.

$12,378 (2014 - $40,235) for consulting fees. The decrease in consulting fees is related to the status change of H. Lutz Klingmann, as Company’s President and CEO. On May 1, 2015 H. Lutz Klingmann became an employee of the Company, and since that date his salary is included under corporate salary expenses.

The Company experienced an unrealized foreign exchange loss of $94,424 and a gain of $561,512$467,088 during the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, respectively, as compared with $174,636a loss of $196,168 and $21,532 for the same periodperiods in 2014. The unrealized gain was mostly related to the convertible debentures, which are denominated in Canadian dollars.dollars while the Company’s functional currency is the US dollar. The exchange rate, stated in Canadian dollars per one US dollar, moved from $1.16 as of December 31, 2014 to $1.25 on June 30, 2015.

6


For the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, the Company incurred a total interest expense of $1,649,939 (Three$1,070,111 and $2,017,864, respectively (three months ended March 31,June 30, 2014 - $691,297)$264,120, six months ended June 30, 2014 - $955,417) related to its various loans and its convertible debentures. The increase was mainly due to the amortization of the discounts and the interest payable related to the convertible debentures and the December 2014 loan. Please refer to theTransaction with Related Parties section for a complete breakdown of the interest expense as there was a portion of the interest capitalized to mineral property interests.

7


The amount of the Company’s derivative liability includes the convertible debentures and the warrants issued in conjunction with the June 2015 Loan. The Company recorded a slight increasedecrease in the derivative liability including foreign exchange of $101,749$2,568,849 as a result of an increasea decrease in the Company’s share price during the quarterthree months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to an increasea decrease of $5,747,376$1,634,681 for the same quarter in 2014. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded a decrease in the derivative liability including foreign exchange of $2,467,100, of which $1,817,356 relates to the convertible debentures and $649,744 relates to the share purchase warrants, as a result of a decrease in the Company’s share price during the six months ended June 30, 2015 as compared to an increase of $4,112,695 for the same period in 2014, all of which is related to the convertible debentures. The derivative liability as of March 31,June 30, 2015 and as of March 31,June 30, 2014 is the result of the convertible debenture having a conversion price denominated in Canadian dollars as well as the fact that the final conversion price is not fixed. These derivative liability changes are a non-cash item and were recorded in accordance with accounting pronouncement ASC 850-40-15. Refer to Note 7 of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for a detailed analysis of the changes in fair value of the derivative liability.

Interest income of $66,142$52,383 (2014 - $9,292)$5,546) was higher during the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 as compared with the same period in 2014 due to higher cash balances in 2015. For the six months ended June 30, 2015, interest income was $118,525 (2014 - $14,838), significantly higher than the same period in 2014 due to higher cash balances. Interest rates remained low during the quarter and are projected to remain low for the remainder of 2015 at least.2015.

The Company recorded a net and comprehensive loss of $1,436,187 *$1,379,265* and $2,815,451* (or $0.01 and $0.03) loss per basic share) during the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 respectively, as compared to net and comprehensive loss of $7,494,638$705,843 and $8,200,482 (or $0.01 and $0.08 loss per basic share) during the same periodperiods of 2014. The difference between the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 and 2014 is mainly due to an increase of interest expenses and closing fees paid during the second quarter of 2015. The difference between the six months ended June 30, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2014 is mainly due to the significant increase in the derivative liability recorded during the firstsecond quarter of 2014, (see above).higher general and administrative expenses during the second quarter of 2014, partly off-set by higher interest expenses during the second quarter of 2015.

* - Net income (loss) for the period attributable to the Company.

Summary of Quarterly Results

Results for the eight most recent quarters are set out in the table below:

Results for the quarter endedon: March 31, 2015  Dec. 31, 2014  Sept. 30, 2014  June 30, 2014 
Results for the quarter ended June 30, 2015  March 31, 2015  Dec. 31, 2014  Sept. 30, 2014 
on:            
Item$ $ $ $  $  $  $  $ 
Revenue Nil  Nil  Nil  Nil  Nil  Nil  Nil  Nil 
Net income (loss) for the quarter (1,436,187)* 1,543,120*  (1,811,843)* (705,843) (1,379,265)* (1,436,186)* 1,543,120*  (1,811,843)*
Basic net income (loss) per share (0.01) 0.02  (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) 0.02  (0.02)
Diluted net income (loss) per share (0.01) 0.00  (0.02) (0.01) (0.01) (0.01) 0.00  (0.02)

Results for the quarter endedon: March 31, 2014  Dec. 31, 2013  Sept. 30, 2013  June 30, 2013 
Results for the quarter ended June 30, 2014  March 31, 2014  Dec. 31, 2013  Sept. 30, 2013 
on:            
Item$  $  $ $  $  $  $  $ 
Revenue Nil  Nil  Nil  Nil  Nil  Nil  Nil  Nil 
Net income (loss) for the quarter (7,494,638) 1,221,564  (637,744) 1,226,780  (705,843) (7,494,638) 1,221,564  (637,744)
Basic net income (loss) per share (0.08) 0.02  (0.01) 0.01  (0.01) (0.08) 0.02  (0.01)
Diluted net income (loss) per share (0.08) (0.01) (0.01) (0.00) (0.02) (0.08) (0.01) (0.01)

* - Net income (loss) for the period attributable to the Company.

8


For the quarters illustrated in the above table, the main reason for the significant fluctuations in the net income (loss) between periods has been the result of the fluctuations in the Company’s derivative liabilities. For fiscal 2015, the Company experienced a loss related to its derivative liabilities in the amount of $101,749 (2014 – Loss of $5,747,376) in the first quarter whereas it recorded a gain of $2,568,849 (2014 – Gain of $1,634,681) during the second quarter. The second quarter gain was however off-set by higher interest expenses and a one-time closing fee of $1,500,000 paid in connection with the June 2015 Loan. For fiscal 2014, the Company experienced a significant loss related to its derivative liabilities in the amount of $5,747,376 (2013 – Gain of $611,949) in the first quarter whereas the second, third and fourth quarters of 2014 resulted in gains of $1,634,681 (2013 – Gain of $1,672,861), $2,861,314 (2013 – Gain of $475,862) and $2,255,598 (2013 – Gain of $2,624,988), respectively. The Company’s derivative liabilities are a function of the Company’s stock price against the instruments strike price. As the stock price rises, the derivative liabilities increase resulting in the Company recognizing losses. When the stock price decreases, the Company recognizes gains. In addition to the derivative liabilities, the Company also incurred in 2014 a commitment fee of $2,250,000 (2013 - $Nil) and a joint venture transactionJoint Venture Transaction fee of $2,750,000 (2013 - $Nil) in the third quarter of fiscal 2014 that were meaningful contributing factors to the significant loss recognized in that quarter. Both fees were one-time fees not previously incurred in priorearlier quarters or to be incurred in future quarters.

7


In general, the results of operations can vary from quarter to quarter depending upon the nature, timing and cost of activities undertaken during the quarter, whether or not the Company incurs gains or losses on foreign exchange or grants stock options, and the movements in its derivative liability.

Please refer to theResults of Operationssection above for the results of operations for the three month periodand six months ended on March 31,June 30, 2015.

Reclamation Financial AssuranceAsset Retirement Obligation

The Company has provided reclamation financial assurance to the Bureau of Land Management, the State and Kern County and a reasonably foreseeable release financial assurance to the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (the “Regional Board”) totaling $553,343$902,382 (December 31, 2014 - $553,329; MarchJune 30, 2014 - $478,739).

The total asset retirement obligation as of June 30, 2015 is $902,382 (December 31, 2014 - $478,727). This deposit earns interest at 0.1% per annum and is not available for working capital purposes. The increase in the deposit in$624,142; June 30, 2014 was to ensure the reclamation financial assurance covers the asset retirement obligation for 2014.

The Company estimates that reclamation financial assurance will increase to $624,142 in 2015 based upon the anticipated work done on site in 2015 and recorded this anticipated obligation as at December 31, 2014. The Company expects that the estimate will be approved by the Kern County Engineering, Surveying & Permit Services Department in the second quarter of 2015 and submitted to the State Office of Mine Reclamation for approval.- $552,250).

The Company estimated its asset retirement obligations based on its understanding of the requirements to reclaim and clean-up its property based on its activities to date. During the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, there were no changeswas an increase of $278,240 to the retirement obligations as compared with the year ended December 31, 2014, where $71,892 was capitalized to mineral property interests as the asset portion of the retirement obligation. The amount was capitalized as the Company is in the development stage and is capitalizing all of its development costs pursuant to our policy.

Reclamation Financial Assurance

The total asset retirement obligation asCompany has provided reclamation financial assurance to the Bureau of March 31, 2015 isLand Management, the State and Kern County totaling $624,142 (December 31, 2014 - $624,142; March 31,$553,329; June 30, 2014 - $552,250)$478,739). PriorThis deposit earns interest at 0.2% per annum and is not available for working capital purposes. The increase in the deposit in 2015 was to 2013,ensure the reclamation financial assurance covers the asset retirement obligation for 2015.

The financial assurance increased to $624,142 in 2015 based upon the anticipated work done on site in 2015 and recorded this anticipated obligation as at December 31, 2014. The estimate was expensed.submitted to the State Office of Mine Reclamation for review and was subsequently approved by the Kern County Engineering, Surveying & Permit Services Department.

Reasonably Foreseeable Release Financial Assurance

In addition to the above, the Company is required to obtain and maintain financial assurance for initiating and completing corrective action and remediation of a reasonably foreseeable release from the Project’s waste management units as required by the Lahontan Regional Water Quality Control Board (the “Regional Board”). The reclamation estimate for 2015 is $278,240 (December 31, 2014 - $Nil).

Property Rent Payments

9


The Company continues to make property rent payments to landholders and paid $10,000$60,167 in cash for the three month periodsix months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, as compared to $10,000$75,500 in cash and $24,480 in common shares of the Company during the same period in 2014. The overall payments during the year are expected to decrease from approximately $184,000 in fiscal 2014 to approximately $150,000$140,000 in 2015.fiscal 2015 as the Company has been buying back royalty interests. The Company is in ongoing discussions with landholders and has made offers to buy back royalty interests. As of March 31,June 30, 2015, $494,266$544,432 paid in property rental payments was capitalized to mineral properties.

Mine Development Commitments

As of June 30, 2015, GQM LLC has entered into contracts for construction totaling approximately $59.2$58.0 million as of March 31, 2015, of which $26.2 million had been paid as of March 31, 2015.remains to be paid. The major commitments relate to the construction of the crushing-screening plant for $18.1 million, the construction of the Phase 1, Stage 1 heap leach pad for $8.3 million, the construction of the conveying and stacking system for $8.2 million and work related to the Merrill-Crowe plant equipment for $7.1 million. The commitments are expected to be paid out in 2015. GQM LLC made approximately $4.0 million in additional construction commitments subsequent to June 30, 2015.

In addition, GQM LLC committed, as of March 31,June 30, 2015, to $16.2$16.6 million of Komatsu mobile mining equipment with Road Machinery LLC. The final terms of the mobile equipment financing were not known as of March 31, 2015. As of March 31,June 30, 2015, GQM LLC received the water truck, a motor grader, twothree dozers, and two articulated trucks and two excavators valued at approximately $4.6$6.8 million (see Note 10 of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for more details). In addition, four mining trucks and two loaders were delivered and assembled on site in April. The Company paid a 10% deposit of $0.9 million in April and expectsPlease refer to finance the remaining purchase price when it officially takes possessionNote 14 of the equipment later this year.

GQM LLC made approximately $1.4 million inunaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for additional construction commitments entered into by the Company subsequent to March 31,June 30, 2015.

8


GQM LLC’s contractual obligations as of March 31,June 30, 2015 are shown in the table below:

Payments DuePayments Due by Period
Contractual Obligations*TotalLess than 1year1-3 years3-5 yearsMore than5 yearsTotalLess than 1
year
1-3 years3-5 yearsMore than5
years
Long-term debt obligations (Komatsu Financial loans)$3,779,115$931,828$1,947,042$900,245-
Long-term debt obligations$5,291,102$1,347,119$2,849,660$1,094,322-
(Komatsu Financial loans) 
Capital lease obligations--
Operating lease obligations--
Purchase obligations (see above)$ 33,049,402-$26,232,017-
Asset retirement obligations$624,142-$624,142$902,382-$902,382
Other long-term liabilities--
Total$37,452,659$33,981,230$1,947,042$900,245$624,142$32,425,501$27,579,136$2,849,660$1,094,322$902,382

*Obligations shown in table above are for GQM LLC. As of March 31,June 30, 2015, the Company’s obligations also include a C$10 million convertible debenture and the $37.5 million June 2015 Loan. The convertible debenture is due in July 2015 (Paid subsequent to June 30, 2015) and the June 2015 Loan is due in December 2014 $12.5 million loan. These obligations are due within one year.2016. Please refer to theTransactions with Related Parties section for complete details.

Off-balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company has no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Stock Option Plan

The Company’s current stock option plan (the “Plan”) was adopted by the Company in 2013 and approved by shareholders of the Company in 2013. The Company also adopted a house keeping amendment to the plan on April 27, 2015 to clarify the procedure for fixing the earlier termination date of stock options. The Plan provides a fixed number of 7,200,000 common shares of the Company that may be issued pursuant to the grant of stock options. The exercise price of stock options granted under the Plan shall be determined by the Company’s board of directors (the “Board”), but shall not be less than the volume-weighted, average trading price of the Company’s shares on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) for the five trading days immediately prior to the date of the grant. The expiry date of a stock option shall be the date so fixed by the Board subject to a maximum term of five years. The Plan provides that the expiry date of the vested portion of a stock optionsoption will terminate onbe the earlier of the expiry ofdate so fixed by the termBoard at the time the stock option is awarded and (i) 12 months from the early termination date an option holder dies, (ii) 12 months from the date from(the “Early Termination Date”). The Early Termination Date will be the date the vested portion of a stock option expires following the option holder ceasesceasing to act asbe a director, employee or officerconsultant, as determined by the Board at the time of grant, or in the Company, or (iii) 12 months fromabsence thereof at any time prior to the datetime the option holder ceases to be employed,a director, employee or engaged as a consultant, byin accordance with and subject to the Company.provisions of the Plan. All options granted under the 2013 Plan will be subject to such vesting requirements as may be prescribed by the TSX, if applicable, or as may be imposed by the Board.

10


The Company granted 50,000 stock options to a consultant of the Company on April 19, 2010. The options are exercisable at a price of $1.22 per share for a period of 5 years from the date of grant.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2013, the Company granted 300,000 options to an officer of the Company, on June 3, 2013. The options are exercisable at a price of $1.16 for a period of five years from the date of grant and vest over a period of 18 months with 100,000 vesting in 6, 12 and 18 months respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2014, the officer resigned and as a result, 100,000 unvested stock options were forfeited. The remaining 200,000 remain outstanding with an accelerated expiration date of November 11, 2015. The Company also granted 50,000 stock options to a consultant of the Company on June 3, 2013. The options are exercisable at a price of $1.16 for a period of five years from the date of grant and vest immediately.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2013, the Company granted 300,000 options to Ms. Andrée St-Germain, the Company’s new Chief Financial Officer, on September 18, 2013. The options are exercisable at a price of $1.26 for a period of five years from the date of grant and vest over a period of 12 months with 100,000 vesting on the date of grant, 100,000 vesting in 6 and 12 months respectively. The Company also granted 150,000 stock options to the Company’s independent directors on September 4, 2013. The options are exercisable at a price of $1.59 for a period of five years from the date of grant and vest immediately.

The Company did not grant options during the quarters ended December 31, 2013, March 31, 2014, June 30, 2014, September 30, 2014, December 31, 2014, and March 31, 2015 and June 30, 2015.

9


A total of 750,000 (750,000700,000 (700,000 exercisable) (December 31, 2014 – 750,000 (750,000 exercisable); March 31,June 30, 2014 – 1,320,000 (1,320,000850,000 (650,000 exercisable)) common shares were issuable pursuant to such stock options as at March 31,June 30, 2015.

Transactions with Related Parties

Except as noted elsewhere in these condensed consolidated interim financial statements, related party transactions are disclosed as follows:

(i)

Consulting Fees

For the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, the Company paid $188,934 (Three months ended March 31, 2014$12,378 and $201,312 respectively (2014 - $45,027)$39,032 and $84,059) to Mr. H. Lutz Klingmann for services as President of the Company of which $Nil (December 31, 2014 - $Nil; March 31,June 30, 2014 - $15,287)$13,797) is payable as at March 31,June 30, 2015. Included in the consulting fees for the threesix months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 was $151,428 (Three(six months ended March 31,June 30, 2014 - $Nil) related to 150,000 bonus shares issued in accordance with the Mr. H. Lutz Klingmann’s management agreement (Refer to Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements). On May 1, 2015 Mr. Klingmann became an employee of the Company and his salary, since that date, is included under corporate salary expenses.

During the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, the Company paid a total of $18,438 (Three months ended March 31, 2014$18,414 and $36,852 respectively (2014 - $11,624)$11,815 and $23,439, respectively) for regular director fees to the three independent directors and Thomas M. Clay. Thomas M.Mr. Clay did not receive directorsdirectors’ fees during the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2014.

(ii)

Convertible Debentures

On July 26, 2013, the Company entered into agreements to issue convertible debentures for aggregate proceeds of C$10,000,000 ($9,710,603), from a significant shareholder group. The convertible debentures are unsecured and bear interest at 2% per annum, calculated on the outstanding principal balance, payable annually. The principal amounts of the notes are convertible into shares of the Company at a price of C$1.03 per share for a period of two years. If the notes have not been converted by the holder prior to the maturity date, then the Company may convert them at the lower of C$1.03 or the market price as at the maturity date.

The market price on the maturity date will be determined based on the volume- weighted average price of the shares traded on the Toronto Stock Exchange for the five trading days preceding the maturity date.

11


A total of C$7,500,000 of the offering was subscribed for by an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company. The Company agreed to pay the legal fees incurred by the lenders relating to this instrument which amounted to $10,049.

The conversion feature of the convertible debentures meets the definition of a derivative liability instrument because the conversion feature is denominated in a currency other than the Company’s functional currency as well as the fact the exercise price is not a fixed price as described above. Therefore, the conversion feature does not meet the “fixed-for-fixed” criteria outlined in ASC 815-40-15.

As a result, the conversion feature of the notes is required to be recorded as a derivative liability recorded at fair value and marked-to-market each period with the changes in fair value each period being charged or credited to income or loss.

The fair value of the derivative liability related to the conversion feature as at MarchJune 30, 2015 is $12,414 (March 31, 2015 is $1,931,519 (December- $1,931,519; December 31, 2014 - $1,829,770). The derivative liability was calculated using an acceptable option pricing valuation model with the following assumptions:

  20152014
 Risk-free interest rate0.50%1.00% - 1.09%
 Expected life of derivative liability0.32 years0.57 - 1.32 years
 Expected volatility77.00%73.03 - 98.21%
 Dividend rate0.00%0.00%

10


 20152014
Risk-free interest rate0.49% - 0.50%1.00% - 1.09%
Expected life of derivative liability0.07 – 0.32 years0.57 – 1.32 years
Expected volatility49.36% - 77.00%73.03 – 98.21%
Dividend rate0.00%0.00%

The changes in the derivative liability related to the conversion feature are as follows:

   March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
        
 Balance, beginning of the period$ 1,829,770 $ 2,833,987 
 Change in fair value of derivative liability including foreign exchange 101,749  (1,004,217)
 Balance, end of the period$ 1,931,519 $ 1,829,770 
  June 20, 2015  December 31, 2014 
       
Balance, beginning of the period$ 1,829,770 $ 2,833,987 
Change in fair value of derivative liability including
    foreign exchange
 (1,817,356) (1,004,217)
Balance, end of the period$ 12,414 $ 1,829,770 

  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Balance, beginning of the period$ 6,649,967 $ 4,642,620 
Discounted convertible debentures -  - 
Amortization of discount 1,590,551  2,510,611 
Foreign exchange (491,482) (503,264)
Balance, end of the period$ 7,749,036 $ 6,649,967 

The change in the convertible debentures is as follows:

   March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
 Balance, beginning of the period$ 6,649,967 $ 4,642,620 
 Discounted convertible debentures -  - 
 Amortization of discount 747,870  2,510,611 
 Foreign exchange (574,344) (503,264)
 Balance, end of the period$ 6,823,493 $ 6,649,967 

During the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, in addition to the amortization of the discount on the convertible debenture, the Company incurred interest expense of $40,285 (Three$40,301 and $80,586, respectively (three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2014 - $45,717)$45,799 and $91,516 respectively) based on the 2% per annum stated interest rate for a total amortization of discount and interest expense of $788,155$882,982 and 1,671,137 for the three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 (Three(three and six months ended March 31,June 30, 2014 - $566,297)$638,837 and $1,205,134 respectively). Interest payable relating to the convertible debenture as at March 31,June 30, 2015 was $104,248$144,549 (December 31, 2014 - $70,721). As the convertible derivative matures, the amortization of the discount increases and as such, the total interest expense increases month-to-month and quarter-to-quarter.

Subsequent to June 30, 2015, the convertible debenture was repaid. Refer to Note 14 – Subsequent Events of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for the six months ended June 30, 2015 for complete details

12



(iii)

Notes Payable

On January 1, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement to secure a $10,000,000 loan (the “January Loan”). The January Loan was provided by members of the Clay family, who are shareholders of the Company, including $7,500,000 provided by an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company. The January Loan had a twelve-month term and an annual interest rate of 5%, payable on the maturity date.

The January Loan was repaid on a date that was less than 183 days before the maturity date. As a result, the Company paid the Lenders an additional charge in the amount that is equivalent to 5% of the principal amount, plus interest on the principal amount at the rate of 5% per annum accrued to the date the January Loan was repaid. The Company repaid the $7,500,000 loan plus the $375,000 accrued interest and $375,000 additional charge on December 31, 2014. The remaining balance of the loan, $2,500,000, the accrued interest of $125,000 and the additional charge of $125,000, were paid on January 5, 2015. In total, the Company incurred $500,000 in interest expense and $500,000 in additional charge related to the January Loan.

On December 31, 2014 the Company also entered into a new loan (the “December Loan”) with the same parties for an amount of $12,500,000. The December Loan iswas due on demand on July 1, 2015 and bearswith an annual interest rate of 10% payable at the end of each quarter. The loan iswas guaranteed by GQM Holdings, and secured by a pledge of the Company's interests in GQM Canada, GQM Canada’s interest in GQM Holdings and GQM Holdings' 50% interest in GQM LLC. The Company also incurred a closing fee to secure the loan in the amount of $1,000,000, of which, $750,000 was paid on December 31, 2014 and the remaining $250,000 was paid on January 5, 2015. The Company agreed to pay the legal fees incurred by the lenders relating to this instrument, which amounted to $90,916. The total legal fees paid for the transaction were $118,695.

The Company also agreed to provide the lenders with the option for certain registration rights whereby the Company would bear the costs and responsibility of registering the lenders common shares for the purposes of disposition subsequent to July 1, 2015. The Company has determined it is unlikely the registration option would be exercised and therefore has not accrued any potential costs related to the registration of the common shares. The Company has presented these transaction costs as a contra liability as substantially all of these costs were paid to the lenders.

11On June 8, 2015, the Company amended the December Loan to extend the maturity to December 8, 2016 and increasing the principal amount from $12,500,000 to $37,500,000 (the “June 2015 Loan”). The Company also issued 10,000,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable for a period of five years expiring June 8, 2020. The common share purchase warrants have an exercise price of $0.95. All other terms remained the same as the December Loan. The Company also incurred a closing fee to secure the loan in the amount of $1,500,000, all of which was paid on June 8, 2015. The Company agreed to pay the legal fees incurred by the lenders relating to this instrument which amounted to $46,408. The legal fees were expensed as the transaction met the definition of a debt extinguishment. The terms of the registration rights remains unchanged as does the Company’s assessment of the likelihood of the registration rights being exercised. As such, as of June 30, 2015, no accrual has been made for the potential costs related to the registration rights.



   March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
 Balance, beginning of the period$ 13,881,305 $ - 
 Proceeds from loans -  22,500,000 
 Repayment of loans (2,500,000) (7,500,000)
 Amortization of closing and legal fees 536,729    
 Capitalized closing fee and legal fees -  (1,118,695)
 Balance, end of the period$ 11,918,034 $ 13,881,305 
  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Balance, beginning of the period$ 13,881,305 $ - 
Fair value at inception 33,497,277  22,500,000 
Repayment of loans (2,500,000) (7,500,000)
Amortization of closing and legal fees 967,156  - 
Amortization of discount on the June Loan 143,069  - 
Extinguishment of the December Loan (12,500,000) - 
Loss on extinguishment of debt 151,539  - 
Capitalized closing fee and legal fees -  (1,118,695)
Balance, end of the period$ 33,640,346 $ 13,881,305 

(iv)

Share Purchase Warrants

13


On June 8, 2015 the Company issued 10 million share purchase warrants to the Clay family in connection with the June 2015 Loan. The share purchase warrants are exercisable until June 8, 2020 at an exercise price of $0.95. Included in the June 2015 Loan agreement was an anti-dilution provision with respect to the share purchase warrants. If the Company were to complete a financing at a share price lower than the exercise price of the share purchase warrants, the exercise price of the share purchase warrants would be adjusted to match the price at which the financing was completed.

The share purchase warrants meet the definition of a derivative liability instrument as the exercise price is not a fixed price as described above. Therefore, the settlement feature does not meet the “fixed-for-fixed” criteria outlined in ASC 815-40-15.

The fair value of the derivative liability related to the share purchase warrants as at June 30, 2015 is $3,352,979 (December 31, 2014 - $Nil). The derivative liability at inception and at period end, was calculated using an acceptable option pricing valuation model with the following assumptions:

 20152014
Risk-free interest rate0.81% - 1.02%-
Expected life of derivative liability4.94 - 5 years-
Expected volatility72.29% - 72.52%-
Dividend rate0.00%-

The change in the derivative share purchase warrants is as follows:

June 30, 2015December 31, 2014
Balance, beginning of the period$ -$ -
Fair value at inception4,002,723-
Change in fair value(649,744)-
Balance, end of the period$ 3,352,979$ -

(v)

Advance

In July 2014, GQM Inc. entered into a $10,000,000 short-term advance agreement (the “Advance”) with Leucadia and Auvergne (the(collectively, the “Lenders”), with the Company as guarantor. Leucadia provided $6,500,000 of the loan and Auvergne provided $3,500,000. The Advance had an interest rate of 10.0% per annum, compounded monthly. Auvergne is an investment vehicle managed by Thomas M. Clay, a Director and insider of the Company. On closing of the joint venture transactionJoint Venture Transaction on September 15, 2014, GQM LLC applied part of the investment of $110,000,000 to repayment of principal and accrued interest on the $10,000,000 bridge loan advanced by the Lenders in July 2014. GQM LLC paid $209,607 in interest payment, including $73,632 paid to Auvergne on the July 2014 Advance, of which $45,264 was capitalized to mineral property interests.

(v)(vi)

Amortization of Discounts and Interest Expense

The following table summarizes the amortization of discount and interest on loan and convertible debentures as at March 31,June 30, 2015 and as at March 31,June 30, 2014.

   March 31, 2015  March 31, 2014 
        
 Interest expense related to the convertible debentures$ 40,285 $ 45,717 
 Interest expense related to notes payable (311,644) 125,000 
 Interest expense related to Komatsu Financial loans 13,411  - 
 Amortization of the convertible debentures 747,870  520,580 
 Amortization of the December 2014 loan closing fees 536,729  - 
        
 Amortization of discount and interest on loan and convertible debentures$1,649,939$691,297
  Three Months  Three Months  Six Months  Six Months 
  Ended  Ended  Ended  Ended 
  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014 
Interest expense related to the
convertible debentures
$ 40,301 $ 45,799 $ 80,586 $ 91,516 
Interest expense related to the
January 2014 loans
 -  616,096  -  741,096 
Interest expense related to the
December 2014 loans
 236,301  -  547,945  - 
Interest expense related to the
June 2015 loans
 229,167  -  229,167  - 
Interest expense related to
Komatsu Financial loans
 31,146  -  44,558  - 
Amortization of the convertible
debentures
 842,681  593,038  1,590,551  1,113,618 
Amortization of the December
2014 loan closing fees
 430,427  -  967,155  - 
Amortization of the June 2015
loan discount
 143,069  -  143,069  - 
Amortization of discount and
interest on loan and convertible
debentures
$ 1,953,092 $ 1,254,933 $ 3,603,031 $ 1,946,230 

14



The Company’s loans were contracted to fund significant development costs. The Company capitalizes a portion of the interest expense as it related to funds borrowed to complete development activities at the Project site.

   March 31, 2015  March 31, 2014 
        
 Amortization of discounts and interest on loan, advance and convertible debenture$ 1,649,939 $ 691,297 
 Less: Interest costs capitalized (702,186) - 
 Amortization of discounts and interest expensed$ 947,753 $ 691,297 
  Three Months  Three Months  Six Months  Six Months 
  Ended  Ended  Ended  Ended 
  June 30, 2015  June 30, 2014  June 30, 2015  June 30,  2014 
Amortization of discounts
and interest on loan, advance
and convertible debenture
$ 1,953,092 $ 1,254,933 $ 3,603,031 $ 1,946,230 
Less: Interest costs
capitalized
 (882,981) (990,813) (1,585,167) (990,813)
Amortization of discounts
and interest expensed
$ 1,070,111 $ 264,120 $ 2,017,864 $ 955,417 

(vi)(vii)

Joint Venture Transaction

On September 15, 2014, the Company closed the JVJoint Venture Transaction with Gauss resulting in both parties owning a 50% interest in the Project. Pursuant to the JV,Joint Venture Transaction, Golden Queen converted its wholly-owned subsidiary GQM Inc., the entity developing the Project, into a California limited liability company named GQM LLC. On closing of the transaction, Gauss acquired 50% of GQM LLC by investing $110 million cash in exchange for newly issued membership units of GQM LLC. GQ Holdings, a newly incorporated subsidiary of the Company, holds the other 50% of GQM LLC.

12


Gauss is a funding vehicle owned by entities controlled by Leucadia National Corporation (NYSE: LUK) (“Leucadia”) and certain members of the Clay family, a shareholder group which collectively owned approximately 27%of the issued and outstanding shares of Golden Queen (the “Clay Group”) at the time of the transaction. Gauss is owned 67.5% by Gauss Holdings LLC (“Gauss Holdings”, Leucadia’s investment entity) and 32.5% by Auvergne LLC (“Auvergne”, the Clay Group’s investment entity).Auvergne. Pursuant to the transaction, Leucadia was paid a transaction fee of $2,000,000 and $275,000 was paid to Auvergne through GQM LLC. The Company has adopted an accounting policy of expensing these transaction costs.

Variable Interest Entity(“VIE”)

In accordance with ASC 810-10-30, the Company has determined that GQM LLC meets the definition of a VIE and that the Company is part of a related party group that, in its entirety, would meet the definition of a primary beneficiary. Although no individual variable interest holder individually meets the definition of a primary beneficiary in the absence of the related party group, Golden Queen has determined it is considered the member of the related party group most closely associated with GQM LLC. As a result, the Company has consolidated 100% of the accounts of GQM LLC in these consolidated financial statements, while presenting a non-controlling interest portion representing the 50% interest of Gauss in GQM LLC on its balance sheet. A portion of the non-controlling interest has been presented as temporary equity on the Company’s balance sheet representing the initial value of the non-controlling interest that could potentially be redeemable by Gauss in the future. The net assets of GQM LLC as of March 31,June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are as follows:

   March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
 Assets, GQM LLC$ 123,774,153 $ 118,937,371 
 Liabilities, GQM LLC (10,179,339) (4,769,144)
 Net assets, GQM LLC$ 113,594,814 $ 114,168,227 
  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Assets, GQM LLC$ 79,517,574 $ 118,937,371 
Liabilities, GQM LLC (14,690,770) (4,769,144)
Net assets, GQM LLC$ 64,826,804 $ 114,168,227 

15



Included in the assets above, is $64,508,799$71,275,286 (December 31, 2014 - $83,282,403) in cash held as at MarchJune 30, 2015. The decrease in cash since December 31, 2015.2014 is the result of construction expenditures, partly off-set by the proceeds from the June 2015 capital contributions from GQ Holdings and Gauss, totaling $25,000,000. The cash in GQM LLC is directed specifically to fund capital expenditures required to take the Project to production and settle GQM LLC’s obligations. The liabilities of GQM LLC do not have recourse to the general credit of the primary beneficiary.

Non-Controlling Interest

In accordance with ASC 810, the Company has presented Gauss’ ownership in GQM LLC as a non-controlling interest amount on the balance sheet within the equity section. However, the Amended and Restated Limited

Liability Company Agreement (“LLC Agreement”) contains terms within Section 12.5 that provides for the exit from the investment in GQM LLC for an initial member whose interest in GQM LLC becomes less than 20%. The following is a summary of the terms of the clause:

Pursuant to Section 12.5, if a member becomes less than a 20% interest holder, its remaining unit interest will (ultimately) be terminated through one of three events at the non-diluted member’s option within 60 days of the diluted member’s interest dropping below 20% (the “triggering event”):

 a.

Through conversion to a net smelter royalty (“NSR”) (in which case the conversion ratio is based on a pro rata percentage, determined on a linear basis, based on the following: 0- 20%0-20% membership interest translates to 0-5% NSR) obligation of GQM LLC;

 b.

Through a buy-out (at fair value) by the non-diluted member; or

 c.

Through a sale process by which the diluted member’s interest is sold


If such sale process does not result in a binding offer acceptable to the non-dilutednon- diluted member within six months after the election by the non-diluted member, the sale process terminates and the non-diluted member has 15 days to choose between (a) and (b).

If the non-diluted member does not make an election pursuant to the above within 60 days, the diluted member may choose (a) or (b) above. If no election is made by the diluted member, option (a) is deemed to have been elected.

This clause in the JVJoint Venture Transaction constitutes contingent redeemable equity as outlined in Accounting Series Release No. 268 (“ASR 268”) and has been classified as temporary equity.

13


On initial recognition the amount of the temporary equity is calculated using the guidance that specifies that the initial measurement of redeemable instruments should be the carrying value. The amount allocated to temporary equity and the permanent equity on initial recognition is shown below. Temporary equity represents the amount of redeemable equity within Gauss’ ownership interest in the net assets of GQM LLC. The remaining 60% of their interest is considered permanent equity as it is not redeemable.

  September 15, 2014 
Net assets, GQM LLC before JVJoint Venture Transaction$ 16,973,184 
Investment by Gauss 110,000,000 
Net assets, GQM LLC after JVJoint Venture Transaction 126,973,184 
Gauss’ ownership percentage 50% 
Net assets of GQM LLC attributable to Gauss$ 63,486,592 
    
Allocation of non-controlling interest between permanent
      equity and temporary equity:
  
Permanent non-controlling interest (60% of total non-
      controlling interest)
$ 38,091,955 
Temporary non-controlling interest (40% of total non-
      controlling interest)
$ 25,394,637 

Subsequent to the initial transaction, the carrying value of the non-controlling interest will be adjusted for net income and loss and distributions pursuant to ASC 810-10 based on the same percentage allocation used to calculate the initial book value of temporary equity.

   March 31, 2015  December 31, 2014 
 Net and comprehensive loss in GQM LLC$ (573,413)$ (2,804,957)
 Non-controlling interest percentage 50%  50% 
 Net and comprehensive loss attributable to non- controlling interest (286,706) (1,402,479)
 Net and comprehensive loss attributable to permanent non-controlling interest$ (172,024)$ (841,487)
 Net and comprehensive loss attributable to temporary non-controlling interest$ (114,682)$ (560,992)

Non-Controlling Interest - Continued

   Permanent Non-  Temporary Non- 
   Controlling Interest  Controlling Interest 
        
 Carrying value of non-controlling interest, December 31, 2014$ 34,250,468 $ 22,833,645 
 Net and comprehensive loss for the period (172,024) (114,682)
 Carrying value of non-controlling interest , March 31, 2015$ 34,078,444 $ 22,718,963 

   Permanent Non-  Temporary Non- 
   Controlling Interest  Controlling Interest 
        
 Carrying value of non-controlling interest, September 15, 2014$ 38,091,955 $ 25,394,637 
 Distributions to non-controlling interests (3,000,000) (2,000,000)
 Net and comprehensive loss for the period (841,487) (560,992)
 Carrying value of non-controlling interest , December 31, 2014$ 34,250,468 $ 22,833,645 

1416



  June 30, 2015  December 31, 2014 
Net and comprehensive loss in GQM LLC$ (1,998,148)$ (2,804,957)
Non-controlling interest percentage 50%  50% 
Net and comprehensive loss attributable to non-
    controlling interest
 (999,074) (1,402,479)
Net and comprehensive loss attributable to
    permanent non-controlling interest
$ (599,445)$ (841,487)
Net and comprehensive loss attributable to
    temporary non-controlling interest
$ (399,629)$ (560,992)

  Permanent Non-  Temporary Non- 
  Controlling Interest  Controlling Interest 
Carrying value of non-controlling interest,
December 31, 2014
$ 34,250,468 $ 22,833,645 
Capital contribution 7,500,000  5,000,000 
Net and comprehensive loss for the period (599,445) (399,629)
Carrying value of non-controlling interest ,
June 30, 2015
$ 41,151,023 $ 27,434,016 

  Permanent Non-  Temporary Non- 
  Controlling Interest  Controlling Interest 
       
Carrying value of non-controlling interest,
September 15, 2014
$ 38,091,955 $ 25,394,637 
Distributions to non-controlling interests (3,000,000) (2,000,000)
Net and comprehensive loss for the period (841,487) (560,992)
Carrying value of non-controlling interest ,
December 31, 2014
$ 34,250,468 $ 22,833,645 

Dilution of Interest in Subsidiary

As a result of the JV transaction,Joint Venture Transaction, the Company’s interest in GQM LLC was diluted from 100% to 50% and ordinarily, the Company would recognize a charge on dilution. However, since the transaction was with a related party and the Company retained control, the excess has not been recognized in net income but rather has been recorded in equity as an increase to APIC based on guidance provided in ASC 810-10-55-4D and -4E.

  September 15, 2014 
Investment by Gauss$ 110,000,000 
Less:   
Initial carrying value of permanent equity (38,091,955)
Initial carrying value of temporary equity (25,394,637)
Effect of dilution of subsidiary recorded to APIC$ 46,513,408 

Management Agreement

GQM LLC is managed by a board of managers comprising an equal number of representatives of each of Gauss and GQGQM Holdings. The initial officers of GQM LLC arewere H. Lutz Klingmann as Chief Executive Officer, and Andrée St-Germain as Chief Financial Officer. Subsequent to June 30, 2015, the President of GQM LLC was appointed as Chief Executive Officer of GQM LLC. A director of the Company was appointed to the GQM LLC Board of Managers as a nominee of the Company, replacing Mr. Klingmann. As long as a member of the Clay family holds greater that 25% of the Company, the Clay Group is entitled to appoint one of the Company’s representatives to the GQM

LLC board of managers.

17


Capital Contribution Agreement

Pursuant to the JV,Joint Venture Transaction, GQ Holdings will have the right to makemade a single capital contribution to GQM LLC of between $15$12.5 million and $25 million (the “Top-Up Contribution”), with each such threshold to be reduced by 50% of the amount of any proceeds received by GQM LLC from any debt financing transaction. Pursuant to the JV Agreement, if the Company (through GQ Holdings) makes the Top-Up Contribution,on June 15, 2015. Gauss is committed to fundalso funded an amount equal to the Top-Up ContributionGQ Holding capital contribution to GQM LLC, and the aggregate amount of such contributions are$25 million is anticipated to provide GQM LLC with the necessary funds to fully develop the Project. If the Company does not make the Top-Up Contribution, GaussBoth partners will be obligated to make up to a $40 million capital contribution to GQM LLC, in which case GQ Holdings’maintain their 50% ownership interest in GQM LLC will be diluted and GQ Holdings will surrender one of its board seats in GQM LLC. If Gauss makes the $40 million capital contribution, the Company will need to reassess whether the resulting dilution of its interest in the JV affects the accounting treatment of the variable interest entity and if consolidation of GQM LLC is still appropriate.Project.

Standby Commitment

Golden Queen also entered into a backstop guarantee agreement with Gauss (the “Backstop Agreement”) whereby, if the Company conducts a rights offering, Gauss has agreed to purchase, upon the terms set forth in the Backstop Agreement, any common shares which have not been acquired pursuant to the exercise of rights under the Rights Offering at a purchase price to be determined but not to exceed $1.10 per common share, up to a maximum amount of $45 million in the aggregate. In consideration for entering into the Backstop Agreement, on closing of the Joint Venture, the Company paid Leucadia and Auvergne a standby guarantee fee of $2,250,000, of which $731,250 was paid to Auvergne.

The Transaction Agreement and Backstop Agreement contemplated that the Company would file a registration statement in connection with the rights offering by October 15, 2014, however, the2014. The Company is conductinghas decided not to proceed with a full review of available financing alternatives,rights offering, and as a result whether the Company will proceed with a possible rights offering (if any), and the size of any such rights offering, is not known at this time. The Company will not be subject to additional fees or expenses as a result of not filing a registration statement in connection with a rights offering.standby commitment has expired.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, interest payable, closing fee payable and notes payablereclamation financial assurance approximate fair values because of the immediate or short-term maturity of these non-level 3 financial instruments. The fair value of the short-term and long-term loans payable approximates theapproximate their carrying valuevalues as the interest rates are based on the market rates as they were initiated during the quarter or just before December 31, 2014.Theand the previous two quarters. The market rates have remained steady for the loans payable during the past three quarters. The carrying value of the short and long term portions of the notes payable approximates their carrying value and have been estimated based on discounted cash flows using interest rates being offered for similar debt instruments. The carrying amount of the convertible debt instrument isand the notes payable are being recorded at amortized cost using the effective interest rate method. As at March 31,June 30, 2015, the estimated fair value of the convertible debt using a discounted cash flow analysis based on an interest rate for a similar type of instrument without a conversion feature was $8,456,064. The fair value of the reclamation financial assurance approximates the carrying value due to its short term nature.$7,686,009 (December 31, 2014: $7,972,993). The embedded derivativederivatives in connection with the convertible debenture isand the share purchase warrants are being recorded at itstheir fair valuevalues using an acceptable valuation model at each reporting period.

15


Please refer also to the note on fair value of derivative liability underResults of Operations above for more information.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company and GQM Holdings (100%-owned by the Company) held $4,574,805$14,446,661 in cash on March 31,June 30, 2015 as compared to $10,939,301$5,076,621 on March 31,June 30, 2014. The decreaseincrease in cash is due to corporate and project-related expenditures, and repayment of the $10 million January 2014proceeds from the June 2015 Loan, partly off-set by proceeds from the $12.5 million December 2014 Loan.capital contribution paid to GQM LLC. It is expected that the cash held by the Company will fund the Company’s corporate expenses until the start of production in late 2015 or early 2016. The only near term commitment of the Company, other than $237,184$169,941 in accounts payable as of March 31,June 30, 2015, is the $12.5 million December 2014 Loan, which will mature in July 2015. The Company also has outstanding convertible debenturesdebenture in the principal amount of C$10 million maturing and payable in July 2015 unless otherwise converted.and accrued interest. The Company holds the right to decide whether or not to convert or pay back the debenture. It is not known at this time if the Companyconvertible debenture was repaid on July 24, 2015 for a total of $7.7 million (C$10 million), including, $153,500 (C$200,000) of accrued interest. The June 2015 Loan will decide to convert or to pay back the debentures.mature in December 2016.

The Company’s 50%-owned subsidiary, GQM LLC, held $64,508,799$71,275,286 in cash as of March 31,June 30, 2015. The cash will be used to fund capital expenditures required to take the Project to production. GQM LLC has entered into contracts for construction totaling approximately $59.2$58.0 million as at March 31,June 30, 2015, of which $26.2 million had beenremains to be paid as of March 31,June 30, 2015. The major commitments relate to the construction of the crushing-screening plant for $18.1 million, the construction of the Phase 1, Stage 1 heap leach pad for $8.3 million, the construction of the conveying and stacking system for $8.2 million and work related to the Merrill-Crowe plant equipment for $7.1 million. The commitments are expected to be paid out in 2015 with the cash on hand. The capital expenditures significantly increased in the first quarter of 2015 as the Company started full construction. The trend will continue until the Company reaches the commissioning phase in late 2015. It is expected that the current cash on hand will fund capital expenditures and working capital needs until the third quarter of 2015. The remaining capital expenditures, estimated to be between $30 million and $40 million will be shared by the joint venture partners.Project reaches positive cash flow. The portion related to mobile mining equipment will be financed through loans with Komatsu Financial. The Company is evaluating various financing options

18


GQM LLC has committed to fund its attributable remaining capitalall the major turn-key projects. Remaining expenditures including debtmostly relate to engineering work, site support, pre-production related expenses, labour, maintenance, spare parts and equity.commissioning related expenses.

Cash used in Operating Activities:

Cash used to fund operating activities, including general and administrative expenses such as legal fees, accounting, taxation and auditing fees, corporate expenses, office expenses and corporate salary was $1,351,647 (Three months ended March 31, 2014 - $ 1,016,685)$4,196,935 (2014 -$2,815,209) for the three monthsix months period ended March 31,June 30, 2015. The increase in cash used in operating activities is the result ofmostly due to an increase in overall corporate activity. With the Company preparing the Project for production, the corporate expenses, officeprepaid expenses and corporate salaries significantly increased. In addition, the Company paid $125,000 in accrued interest and a $125,000 additional charge related to the January 2014 Loan this quarter.payable.

In July 2012, the Company received notice that it had met all the remaining major conditions of the conditional use permits for development of the Project. As a result, Management made the decision to begin capitalizing all development expenditures directly related to the Project (please refer toCash used inInvesting Activities below for further details on 2015 project expenditures). Prior to July 2012, all Project-related expenditures were written off due to uncertainties around obtaining the necessary permits. In 2012, cash was used mainly for the ongoing development of the Project. Major expenditures included consulting engineering fees, costs incurred for ongoing sampling and analysis of groundwater, legal fees and consulting fees incurred to prepare a NI 43-101 Technical Report.

These expenditures are now being treated as investing activities since 2012 as the Company is preparing the Project for production.

16


Cash used in Investing Activities:

The Company began capitalizing all development expenditures directly related to the Project in July 2012. Prior to July 2012, all Project-related expenditures were written off due to uncertainties around obtaining the necessary approvals for proceeding with the Project.

Cash used in investing activities totaled $18,222,393$34,738,762 during the three month period ended March 31, 2015 (Threesix months ended March 31, 2014June 30, 2015 (2014 - $3,087,257)$7,250,113). The increase is due to the increased level of activity on site.

The development costs incurred/capitalized, by the Company totalled $18,222,379 (Three$34,389,709 (2014 - $7,250,113) for the six months ended March 31, 2014 - $3,087,272) for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, which was an increase of $15,135,107$27,139,596 as compared to the same period in 2014. See Note 8 – Supplementary Disclosures of Cash Flow Information in the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for non-cash adjustments to mineral property interest investing activities. There was a significant increase in activity on site during the first quarterhalf 2015 due to the initiation of full construction in the fourth quarter of 2014. The following is a breakdown of significant development costs incurred during the three month periodsix months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 as compared with the same period in 2014:

$5,200,79511,057,941 (2014 - $Nil)$1,360,426) in costs related to the construction of the crushing-screening plant. Approximately $1 million was paid as a progress payment on the high pressure grinding rolls or HPGR.HPGR during the six months ended June 30, 2015. The remainingremainder was spent on progress payments for the equipment, the construction of the Hilfiker wall, concrete foundations and concrete foundations.steel erection.

 

$665,379 (2014 - $Nil) for the purchase of Komatsu mobile mining equipment. GQM LLC received two dozers and two articulated trucks in the first quarter of 2015. The equipment was financed through loans with Komatsu Financial.

$3,084,0416,489,477 (2014 - $22,158)$52,771) in costs related to the construction of the Phase 1, Stage 1 heap leach pad. The contractor started the preparation of the heap leach pad in early 2015 and site grading was completed in March. Mixing of the historical tailings and natural clay from a deposit along Mojave Tropico Road was completed in May and the mix has been used for the lower, impervious liner for the events pond, the solution conveying channel and for the heap leach pad. The installation of the impermeable liner for the events pond, the solution conveying channel and for the heap leach pad was completed in June. The installation of the over- liner commenced in May.

 

$2,749,5054,791,454 (2014 - $Nil) in costs related to the construction of the Merrill-Crowe plant. The pump box was essentially completed during the first quarter. All equipment has been ordered and the supporting steel is being fabricated in Mexico. The construction of the footings started in May and the building was delivered in May.

19



$3,149,198 (2014 - $Nil) in costs related to the construction of the conveying and stacking system. GQM LLC entered into a turn-key contract for the conveying and stacking system during the fourth quarter of 2014. Progress payments were made during the first quarterand second quarters of 2015. The equipment was delivered in April and May and the assembly was initiated shortly thereafter.

 

$2,512,373 (2014 - $Nil) in costs related to the construction of the Merrill-Crowe plant. Approximately $1.8 million in progress payments were made on plant equipment with the remainder spent on the Merrill-Crowe plant building and for the construction of the pump box.

$1,131,9022,220,389 (2014 - $640,222)$1,262,356) in engineering and consulting costs. Engineering costs mostly comprised of engineering and project management costs related to the crushing-screening plant.

 

$1,073,7611,852,610 (2014 - $Nil)$54,568) in costs related to the water supply and water storage infrastructure. The five water storage tanks were delivered during the first quarter. Production well PW-4 was drilled in June.

 

$935,9941,703,913 (2014 - $85,414)$233,194) related to costs to prepare the power supply for the site. Power poles were erected during the first quarter. Nine transformers were delivered in June.

 

$702,1861,585,167 (2014 - $Nil)$990,813) in interest expense capitalized to mineral property interests.

 

$76,0231,532,920 (2014 - $1,096,743)$Nil) in site preparation costs. Site preparation costs decreased becauserelated to the site preparation is nearly completeassay laboratory. The construction of the assay laboratory was essentially completed during the first quarter of 2015. The laboratory was subsequently equipped during the second quarter of 2015. Ventilation balancing, mechanical equipment installation and the construction has advanced.electrical hook-ups were completed in June.

 

$245,535919,470 (2014 - $605,626)$Nil) for the purchase of Komatsu mobile mining equipment. GQM LLC received two dozers and two articulated trucks in costs related to the constructionfirst quarter of 2015. Two excavators and one dozer were subsequently received in the second quarter of 2015. GQM LLC paid the sales tax and 10% deposit upon delivery. The remaining of the workshop and warehouse. The decrease is attributable to the fact that construction of the workshop and warehouse is essentially complete.purchase costs was financed through loans with Komatsu Financial.

The Company, through GQM LLC, continued its work on the Project as described inConstruction of Infrastructure and Project Facilitiesabove. Construction is advancing smoothly and is approximately 40%65% complete. All turn-key projects have been awarded to independent contractors.

Workshop-Warehouse: This project was completed on time and on budget in 2014. The workshop-warehouse was fully equipped with the necessary lubrication equipment, compressor, work bencheswork-benches and a waste oil storage tank in February. Work onFebruary 2015. Construction of four offices constructed on the floor above the warehouse was completed in March. We received approval for early occupancy of both the workshop-warehouse and the assay laboratory in April. Both buildings are not currentlyThe workshop-warehouse is fully functional and is now being used.

17


Assay Laboratory: The construction started in the fourth quarter of 2014 and was completed on time and on budget during the first quarter of 2015. We received approval for early occupancy of the assay laboratory in April. The laboratory was equipped during the second quarter of 2015 and ventilation balancing, mechanical equipment installation and electrical hookups were completed in June. The laboratory was ordered and we expect to have a fully operational assay laboratory by mid-May.commissioned in July.

Water Supply & Water Storage: The construction of the basic water supply infrastructure for the Project is well under way.has been completed. The electrical installations at water well PW-1 were completed in March and water supply from the well is now fully automated. WeFive water storage tanks were delivered during the second quarter and the construction of the foundations will start drillingbe completed during the third quarter. The backup production water well (PW-4) was drilled, equipped and tested in mid-May. Delivery of fiveJune and the connection to the mine water storage tankssupply infrastructure is expected in late May.to be completed during the third quarter.

Power Supply: Construction of the site-wide power distribution system is advancing rapidlyhas essentially been completed and all power poles have been set. Foundations for the primary sub-station will be constructed in late May.August. Nine transformers were ordereddelivered in October 2014 and delivery is expected in late May.June. We expect to connect to the Southern California Edison power linegrid in July.two phases in August and September.

Crushing-Screening Plant: The Hilfiker wall was completed in February, on time and slightly below budget. Construction of the footings and construction of a retaining wall in the primary crusher area was completed in April. Structural steel and equipment for the primary crusher will behas been delivered in late May. This turn-key projectto site and steel erection is expected to be completed in September.underway. The order for the high pressure grinding roll or HPGR was placed with ThyssenKrupp Industrial Solutions (USA), Inc. in the third quarter of 2014. We expect to receive2014 and the HPGR onis expected to be delivered to site in July, slightly aheadAugust. Detailed designs for the HPGR area including foundations were completed in May. Construction of schedule.a second Hilfiker wall in the HPGR area was started in June and completed mid-July. Construction of the footings to support the HPGR has been completed.

20


Heap Leach Pad Phase 1/Stage 1: The contractor startedearthmoving phase of the preparationPhase 1, Stage 1 heap-leach pad, the events pond and the solution conveying channel were completed during the first quarter. Mixing of the historical tailings and natural clay from a deposit along Mojave Tropico Road was completed in May and the mix has been used to construct the lower, impervious liner for the events pond, the solution conveying channel and for the heap leach pad. The synthetic upper liner was placed in the events pond and solution collection ditch in May and the upper synthetic linerwas placed on the heap leach pad in early 2015. Site grading was completed in March.May and June. A sub-contractor mobilized a portable crushing-screening plant to site and over-liner material is being crushed and placed on the heap leach pad. This turn-key project is expected to be completed in August.

Merrill-Crowe plant: The contract for the equipment was awarded during the fourth quarter of 2014 and the contract for the Merrill-Crowe plant building was awarded in January 2015. The contractor has placed orders for the equipment and the supporting steel is being fabricated in Mexico. The building is on order. Excavation for construction of the footings was completed in April. Basic construction of the pump box was completed in March. Construction of the footings is under way and will be completed in August. The building has been delivered and erection of the building has started. This turn-key project is expected to be completed in October.November.

Stacking and Conveying System: The erection of the overland conveyor started in April. Equipment for the otherand structural steel components of the conveying and stacking system is beingwere delivered on schedule.during the second quarter and the assembly started shortly thereafter. This turn-key project is expected to be completed in September.

Cash from Financing Activities:

Cash used in investingfrom financing activities totaled $2,750,000$33,250,000 during the three month period ended March 31, 2015 (Threesix months ended March 31, 2014 –June 30, 2015 (2014 - proceeds of $10,012,721)$10,111,421)). The significant increase is due to the June 2015 Loan incremental proceeds of $25,000,000 and Gauss LLC’s $12,500,000 capital contribution to GQM LLC. The remaining balance of the January 2014 Loan, $2,500,000 and closing fees of $250,000 on the December 2014 Loan were paid during the first quarter of 2015. The Company also paid closing fees of $1,500,000 in conjunction with the June 2015 Loan.

On January 1, 2014, the Company entered into the $10,000,000 January Loan. The January Loan had a twelve-monthtwelvemonth term and an annual interest rate of 5%, payable on the maturity date. The Company repaid $7,500,000 of the loan on December 31, 2014. The remaining balance of the loan, $2,500,000 was repaid on January 5, 2015 (please seeTransactions with Related Parties above for more information).

On June 8, 2015, the Company amended the December Loan to extend the maturity to December 8, 2016 and increasing the principal amount from $12,500,000 to $37,500,000 (the “June Loan”). The Company also issued 10,000,000 common share purchase warrants exercisable for a period of five years expiring June 8, 2020. The common share purchase warrants have an exercise price of $0.95. All other terms remained the same as the December Loan. The Company also incurred a closing fee to secure the loan in the amount of $1,500,000, all of which was paid on June 8, 2015. The Company agreed to pay the legal fees incurred by the lenders relating to this instrument which amounted to $46,408. The total legal fees were expensed as the transaction met the definition of a debt extinguishment.

Working Capital:

As at March 31,June 30, 2015, the Company, on a consolidated basis, had current assets of $69,375,847$86,897,397 (December 31, 2014 - $91,574,405; March 31,June 30, 2014 - $11,010,573)$5,268,212) and current liabilities of $27,887,261$17,951,428 (December 31, 2014 - $26,464,078; March 31,June 30, 2014 - $12,150,352)$12,788,240) or working capital of $41,488,586$68,945,969 (December 31, 2014 –$65,110,327; March 31,- $65,110,327; June 30, 2014 - working capital deficiency of $1,139,779)$7,520,028). The increase in working capitalcurrent assets from March 31,June 30, 2014 is the result of amounts advanced in connection withproceeds from the Joint Venture Transaction and the June 2015 loan, partially off-set by project-related expenditures. The decrease is current liabilities is the result of the extension of the December 2014 Loan with the June 2015 Loan, partly off-set by an increase in mobile equipment loans at the Joint Venture level and an increase in accounts payable.

The CompanyGQM LLC will use its cash on hand for ongoing construction work on site (refer toConstruction of Infrastructure and Project Facilities above), and for detailed engineering of facilities forworking capital related expenditures until the Project reaches positive cash flows.

Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd will use its cash for buying back royalty interests, for additional land purchases,general corporate expenditures such as accounting fees, legal fees, interest expense and for legal, accounting and regulatory fees.corporate salary expenses.

18


Please refer also toOutlookbelow.

The Company is evaluating various options for financing its Joint Venture obligations and repaying its debt obligations, including debt, equity and other alternatives.21


Outstanding Share Data

The number of shares issued and outstanding and the fully diluted share position are set out in the table below:

ItemNo. of Shares No. of Shares 
Shares issued and outstanding on December 31, 201499,778,683 
Shares issued and outstanding on March 31, 201599,928,683 
Shares issued for mineral propertiesNil Nil 
Shares issued pursuant to the exercise of stock optionsNil Nil 
Shares issued pursuant to a management agreement *150,000 
Shares issued and outstanding on March 31, 201599,928,683Exercise PriceExpiry Date
Shares issued and outstanding on June 30, 201599,928,683Exercise PriceExpiry Date
Director and consultants stock options
750,000
UStd.16 to
UStd.59
From 04/18/15
to 09/18/18
700,000td.16 to td.59From 11/11/15
to 09/18/18
Shares to be issued as a finder’s fee100,000Not Applicable100,000Not Applicable
Additional bonus shares issuable to H. Lutz Klingmann150,000Not Applicable
Fully diluted on March 31, 2015100,928,683 
Expired stock options(50,000)$1.2204/18/2015
Shares to be issued on conversion of convertible
debentures**
9,708,736

Lower of Ctd.03
or market price on
maturity date**
07/25/15

Fully diluted on May 11, 2015110,587,419 
Fully diluted on June 30, 2015100,728,683 
Shares to be issued on exercise of warrants10,000,000$0.9506/08/20
Fully diluted on August 10, 2015110,728,683 
The company has an unlimited authorized share capital

*150,000 bonus common shares were issued on March 27, 2015 to H. Lutz Klingmann, the President of the Company, pursuant to his management agreement. Refer to Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for further details on H. Lutz Klingmann’s management agreement.
** The principal amounts of the convertible debentures, being an aggregate of C$10,000,000, are convertible into shares of the Company at a price of C$1.03 per share for a period of two years. If the convertible debentures have not been converted by the holder prior to the maturity date, then either the Company or the holder may convert them at the lower of C$1.03 or the market price as at the maturity date. The market price on the maturity date will be determined based on the volume weighted average price of the shares as traded on the TSX for the five trading days preceding the maturity date.

Outlook

The estimated capital costs, including contingency, working capital and mining equipment, are $144 million.

The net proceeds from the Joint Venture Transaction will be applied to the continued development of the Project. It is expected that the current cash on hand will fund capital expenditures and working capital needs until the third quarter of 2015. The remaining capital expenditures, estimated to be between $30 million and $40 million will be shared by the Joint Venture partners.Project reaches positive cash flows from production. The portion related to mobile mining equipment will be financed through loans with Komatsu.

The Company is evaluating various financing options, including debt and equity, to fund its attributable remaining capital expenditures. The $12.5 million December Loan will also mature in July 2015 and the Company will need to raise the capital required to retire the loan and accrued interest. The Company also has outstanding convertible debentures in the principal amount of C$10 million maturing and payable in July 2015, unless otherwise converted. The Company holds the right to decide whether to convert or pay back the debenture. It is not known at this time if the Company will decide the convert or to pay back the debentures.

Construction is advancing smoothly and has progressed to a 40%65% completion rate; all turn-key projects have been awarded to independent contractors. The Company expects commissioning of the processing facilities in late 2015.

Recent developments include:

We will start drilling backup production water well PW-4 in mid-May. Delivery of five water storage tanks is expected in late May.

19



The equipment for the overland conveyor has been delivered and our contractor is in the process of erecting the overland conveyor.

The Merrill-Crowe plant equipment has been ordered and the supporting steel is being fabricated in Mexico. The building is on order, the excavation of the footings was completed in April and the construction of the footings will be completed in late May.

The earthmoving phase of the Phase 1, Stage 1 heap-leach pad, the events pond and the solution conveying channel has been completed. A sub-contractor to our prime contractor has mobilized a portable crushing- screening plant to site and overliner material is being crushed and stockpiled.

Construction of footings in the primary and secondary crusher sections of the crushing-screening plant has essentially been completed. Structural steel and equipment for the primary crusher section will be delivered by mid-May.

The primary mobile mining equipment, two rubber-tired loaders and four 100 ton haulage trucks, have been delivered to site and assembled.

It is not expected that GQM LLC will hedge any of its gold or silver production.

The Company is evaluating its options, including debt and equity, to re-finance the June 2015 Loan which matures on December 8, 2016.

The ability of the Company to develop a mine on the property is subject to numerous risks, certain of which are disclosed in the Company’s latest Form 10-K filing with the SEC, dated March 16, 2015. Readers should evaluate the Company’s prospects in light of these and other risk factors.

Mineral Properties

In July 2012, the Company received notice that it had met all remaining major conditions of the conditional use permits for the Project. As a result, Managementmanagement made the decision to begin capitalizing all development expenditures related to the Project while all other expenses not related to the development of the project continue to be expensed as incurred. Refer also to Note 3 Mineral PropertiesProperty Interests of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for a more detailed discussion.

Subsequent Events

Subsequent to March 31,June 30, 2015, mobile mining equipment was delivered to site.GQM LLC took possession of two loaders and four 100 ton haul trucks, valued at $9.6 million. Shortly after receivingtaking possession of the equipment, the Company paid $0.6 million in sales tax. The 10% deposit of $0.9 million had already been paid during the second quarter of 2015. The remaining $8.1 million will be financed over 48 months at an interest rate of 4.24%.

Subsequent to June 30, 2015, GQM LLC took possession of a dozer, valued at $0.2 million, which representedmillion. Shortly after taking possession of the equipment, the Company paid $17,550 in sales tax and made a 10% deposit.deposit of $23,400. The remaining $0.8$0.2 million will be financed over 48 months at an interest rate of 2.99%.

In addition, four mining trucks22


On July 24, 2015, the Company repaid its C$10.0 million ($7.7 million) convertible debenture and two loaders were deliveredaccrued interest of C$200,000 ($153,500).

On August 10, 2015, the President and assembled on site in April.Chief Executive Officer of the Company stepped down. The current Chairman of the Company assumed the role of Interim Chief Executive Officer. The Company paidalso appointed the President and Chief Executive Officer of GQM LLC to the position of Chief Operating Officer. The Company and the former President and Chief Executive Officer entered into a 10% depositseparation agreement as of $0.9 million in April and expects to financeAugust 10, 2015, which provides for the remaining purchase price when it officially takes possessiontermination of the equipment later this year.employment agreement and an agreement for the Company to pay six month’s salary commencing from the date of termination. The separation agreement also confirms that as a result of the termination of the employment agreement, the 150,000 bonus shares that were to be issued upon reaching the commencement of production, will no longer be issuable as that milestone was not met as at the date of termination of the employment agreement.

Application of Critical Accounting Estimates

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. Because a precise determination of many assets and liabilities is dependent upon future events, the preparation of financial statements for a period necessarily involves the use of estimates which have been made using careful judgment.

The financial statements have, in management’s opinion, been properly prepared within reasonable limits of materiality and within the framework of the significant accounting policies summarized below:

Mineral Property and Exploration Costs

Costs related to the development of our mineral reserves are capitalized whenit has been determined an ore body can be economically developed. An ore body is determined to be economically minable based on proven and probable reserves and when appropriate permits are in place. Major mine development expenditures are capitalized, including primary development costs such as costs of building access roads, heap leach pads, processing facilities, and infrastructure development.

Costs for exploration, pre-production development, if and when applicable, and maintenance and repairs on capitalized property, plant and equipment are charged to operations as incurred. Exploration costs include those relating to activities carried out in search of previously unidentified mineral deposits. Pre-production development activities involve costs incurred in the exploration stage that may ultimately benefit production that are expensed due to the lack of evidence of economic development, which is necessary to demonstrate future recoverability of these expenses. Secondary development costs are incurred for preparation of an ore body for production in a specific ore block, stope or work area, providing a relatively short-lived benefit only to the mine area they relate to, and not to the ore body as a whole.

20


Drilling and related costs are either classified as exploration or secondary development, as defined above, and charged to operations as incurred, or capitalized, based on the following criteria:

Whether or not the costs are incurred to further define mineralization at and adjacent to existing reserve areas or intended to assist with mine planning within a reserve area;

Whether or not the drilling costs relate to an ore body that has been determined to be commercially mineable, and a decision has been made to put the ore body into commercial production; and

Whether or not at the time that the cost is incurred, the expenditure: (a) embodies a probable future benefit that involves a capacity, singly or in combination, with other assets to contribute directly or indirectly to future net cash inflows, (b) we can obtain the benefit and control others’ access to it, and (c) the transaction or event giving rise to our right to or control of the benefit has already occurred.

If all of these criteria are met, drilling and related costs are capitalized. Drilling costs not meeting all of these criteria are expensed as incurred. The following factors are considered in determining whether or not the criteria listed above have been met, and capitalization of drilling costs is appropriate:

Completion of a favourable economic study and mine plan for the ore body targeted;

Authorization of development of the ore body by management and/or the Board of Directors; and

All permitting and/or contractual requirements necessary for us to have the right to or control of the future benefit from the targeted ore body have been met.

23


Once production has commenced, capitalized costs will be depleted using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the proven and probable reserves. If mineral properties are subsequently abandoned or impaired, any capitalized costs will be charged to the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for that period.

We assess the carrying cost of our mineral properties for impairment whenever information or circumstances indicate the potential for impairment. Such evaluations compare estimated future net cash flows with our carrying costs and future obligations on an undiscounted basis. If it is determined that the future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying value of the property, a write down to the estimated fair value is charged to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the period. Where estimates of future net cash flows are not available and where other conditions suggest impairment, management assesses if the carrying value can be recovered.

Proceeds received under option agreements and/or earn-in agreements are recorded as a cost recovery against the carrying value of the underlying project until the carrying value is reduced to zero. Any proceeds received in excess of the carrying value of the project are recorded as a realized gain in the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss).

Capitalized Interest

For significant exploration and development projects, interest is capitalized as part of the historical cost of developing and constructing assets in accordance with ASC 835-20 ("capitalization of interest"). Interest is capitalized until the asset is ready for service. Capitalized interest is determined by multiplying the Company’s weighted-average borrowing cost on general debt by the average amount of qualifying costs incurred. Once an asset subject to interest capitalization is completed and placed in service, the associated capitalized interest is expensed through depletion or impairment. See Note 7(v)7(vi) of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements.

Non-controlling Interest

Non-controlling interest consists of equity in GQM LLC not attributable, directly or indirectly, to Golden Queen. GQM LLC meets the definition of a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”). Golden Queen has determined it is the member of the related party group that is most closely associated with GQM LLC and, as a result, is the primary beneficiary who consolidates GQM LLC. The non-controlling interest has been classified into two categories; permanent equity and temporary equity.

Non-controlling interests in temporary equity represent the estimated portion of non-controlling interest that could potentially be convertible through either a conversion of the non-controlling interest into a net smelter royalty obligation of GQM LLC or a buy-out of the non-controlling interest at fair value by the Company. The convertible portion of non-controlling interest recorded in temporary equity is initially recorded at the carrying value and then adjusted for net income or loss and distributions attributable to the temporary equity.

21


The non-controlling interest in permanent equity represents the portion of the non-controlling interest that is not convertible. Please refer to Note 7(vi)7(vii) of the unaudited condensed consolidated interim financial statements for complete details of how the transaction has been accounted for.

Asset Retirement ObligationsDerivative Liabilities

GQM LLC’s provision for reclamationDerivative liabilities consist of the property is estimated each year by an independent consulting engineer. This estimate, once approved by stateCompany’s convertible debentures and county authorities, forms the basis for a cash depositderivative liabilities related to support the reclamation financial assurance mechanism. GQM LLC estimated its asset retirement obligations based on its understanding of the requirements to reclaim and clean-up its property based on its activities to date. As a result, GQM LLC has recorded an asset retirement obligation of $624,142.

GQM LLC has provided reclamation financial assurance to the Bureau of Land Management, the State of California and Kern County totaling $553,343.

Derivative Liabilitiestheir share purchase warrants.

If the Company’s convertible debentures have not been converted by the holder prior to the maturity date, then either the Company or the holder may convert them at the lower of C$1.03 or the market price as at the maturity date. The convertible debentures were required to be accounted for as separate derivative liabilities due to this possible variability in conversion price.

The share purchase warrants issued by the Company are exercisable at $0.95 per share purchase warrant for a period of five years. They are required to be accounted for as a separate derivative liability due to an anti-dilution clause that could potentially result in the exercise price being reduced.

24


These liabilities were required to be measured at fair value. These instruments were adjusted to reflect fair value at each period end. Any increase or decrease in the fair value was recorded in results of operations as change in fair value of derivative liabilities. In determining the appropriate fair value, we used the Binomial pricing model.

New Accounting Policies

(i)Effective August 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards update (“ASU”) 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40 –Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The update essentially requires management of all entities, for annual and interim periods, to evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issued.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:

1.

Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans).

2.

Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations.

3.

Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there issubstantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concernwithin one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:

1.

Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

2.

Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations.

3.

Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

22


This update will come into effect for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The Company is assessing the impact of this standard.

ii) In February 18, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02,Consolidation (Topic 810) Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis whichfocuseswhichfocuses on the consolidation evaluation for reporting organizations (public and private companies and not-for-profit organizations) that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. In addition to reducing the number of consolidation models from four to two, the new standard simplifies the standards and improves current GAAP by:

Placing more emphasis on risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest. A reporting organization may no longer have to consolidate a legal entity in certain circumstances based solely on its fee arrangement, when certain criteria are met.

Reducing the frequency of the application of related-party guidance when determining a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity (VIE).

Changing consolidation conclusions for public and private companies in several industries that typically make use of limited partnerships or VIEs.

The ASU will be effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is assessing the impact of this standard.

iii) In April, 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) which focuses on simplifying the presentation of debt issuance costs, the amendments in this update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this update.

25


The ASU will be effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2015, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company is assessing the impact of this standard.

Qualified Person and Caution With Respect to Forward-looking Statements

Mr. H. Lutz Klingmann, P.Eng., the President of the Company, is a qualified person for the purposes of NI 43-101 and has reviewed and approved the technical information in this Form 10-Q.

This Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements, which relate to the intent, belief and current expectations of the Company’s management, as well as assumptions and parameters used in the feasibility study referenced in this report. These forward-looking statements are based upon numerous assumptions that involve risks and uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements. Such factors include among other things the receipt and compliance with the terms of required approvals and permits, the costs of and availability of sufficient capital to fund the projects to be undertaken by the Company and commodity prices. In addition, projected mining results, including quantity of ore, grade, production rates, and recovery rates, are subject to numerous risks normally associated with mining activity of the nature described in this report and in the feasibility study, and as a result actual results may differ substantially from projected results. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date the statements were made.

Caution to U.S. Investors

Management advises U.S. investors that while the terms “measured resources”, “indicated resources” and “inferred resources” are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the SEC does not recognize these terms. U.S. investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the material in the mineral resource categories will be converted into mineral reserves. References to such terms are contained in the Company’s Form 10-K and other publicly available filings. We further advise U.S. investors that the mineral reserve estimates disclosed in this report have been prepared in accordance with Canadian regulations and may not qualify as “reserves” under the SEC Industry Guide 7. Accordingly, information concerning mineral resources and reserves set forth herein may not be comparable with information presented by companies using only U.S. standards in their public disclosure.

23


Additional Information

Further information on Golden Queen Mining Co. Ltd. is available on the SEDAR web site atwww.sedar.com and on the Company’s web site atwww.goldenqueen.com.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.Risk

Interest Rate Risk

The Company holds 90%96% of its cash in bank deposit accounts with a single major financial institution. The interest rates received on these balances may fluctuate with changes in economic conditions. Based on the average cash balances during the quarter ended March 31,June 30, 2015, a 1% decrease in interest rates would have reduced the interest income for the period by a trivial amount.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Certain purchases of labour are denominated in Canadian dollars. As a result, currency exchange fluctuations may impact the costs of our operations. Specifically, the appreciation of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar may result in an increase in the Canadian operating expenses in U.S. dollar terms. As of March 31,June 30, 2015, the Company maintained the majority of its cash balance in U.S. dollars. The Company currently does not engage in any currency hedging activities.

Commodity Price Risk

The Company’s primary business activity is the development of the open pit, gold and silver, heap leach project on the Property. Decreases in the price of either of these metals from current levels has the potential to negatively impact the Company’s ability to secure significant additional financing required to develop the Project into an operating mine. We do not currently engage in hedging transactions and we have no hedged mineral resources.

We do not currently engage in hedging transactions and we have no hedged mineral resources.26


Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

TimelyEvaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The term “disclosure controls and procedures” is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the “Exchange Act. These rules refer to the controls and other procedures of a company that are designed to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the required time periods. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. It is management’s responsibility to establish and maintain adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company.disclosure controls and procedures.

As of March 31, 2015, ourOur Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, and our external Sarbanes-Oxley consultants carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon this evaluationOther than as noted below, as of June 30, 2015, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effectiveoperating effectively.

The due date under U.S. federal securities laws for filing information with respect to ensureItems 10 through 14 of our Form 10-K for the December 2014 year end was April 30, 2015 unless the information was contained in a proxy statement filed by that date. The Company did not file a proxy statement by April 30, 2015, and filed an amended Form 10-K on May 6, 2015 to include information we are requiredwith respect to disclose inItems 10 through 14. As a result, the reports we file or submit underCompany’s amendment to its Form 10-K was not made on a timely basis. The late filing arose as a result of a communication error with staff concerning the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarizedfiling of the proxy statement. Management has implemented procedures to specify a person responsible for communication of SEC filing dates with company staff members and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.internal redundancy to its filing date scheduling system for SEC filings.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a15(f) of the Exchange Act), which is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.

Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2015, using criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Using this framework, management concluded that we have maintained effective internal control over financial reporting.

Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. Because of its inherent limitations, any system of disclosure control or internal control over financial reporting, no matter how well designed, may not prevent or detect misstatements due to the possibility that a control can be circumvented or overridden or that misstatements due to error or fraud may occur that are not detected. Also,These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of control. Further, because of changes in conditions, internal control effectiveness may vary over time.

24


Management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2015, using criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and concluded that we have maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2015, based on these criteria.

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as required by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15(d)-15(e) as of the end of the reporting period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, including controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us is accumulated and communicated to our management (including our CEO and CFO), were effective as of March 31, 2015, in assuring them in a timely manner that material information required to be disclosed in this report has been properly recorded, processed, summarized and reported.

Changes in Internal Control

There were no material changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) during the three month periodquarter ended March 31, 2015.June 30, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Fraud Analysis

The Company is committed to preventing fraud and corruption and is developing an anti-fraud culture. To achieve this goal, the Company has committed to the following:

27



1.

Developing and maintaining effective controls to prevent fraud;

2.

Ensuring that if fraud occurs a vigorous and prompt investigation takes place;

3.

Taking appropriate disciplinary and legal actions;

4.

Reviewing systems and procedures to prevent similar frauds;

5.

Investigating whether there has been a failure in supervision and take appropriate disciplinary action if supervisory failures occurred; and

6.

Recording and reporting all discovered cases fraud.

The following policies have been developed to support the Company’s goals:

Insider Trading Policy
Managing Confidential Information Policy
Whistleblower Policy
Anti-corruption Policy

All policies can be viewed in full on the Company’s website atwww.goldenqueen.com

For the three month periodand six months ended March 31,June 30, 2015 and year ended December 31, 2014, there were no reported instances of fraud.

2528


PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

See “The Center for Biodiversity Petition to List the Mojave Shoulderband Snail as an Endangered Species” and “Other Legal Matters” contained in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-Q.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There are no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Form 10-K for the fiscal period ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the SEC on March 16, 2015.

Item 5. Mine Safety Disclosures

GQM LLC is the operator of the Project, which is located in Mojave in Kern County, California. The Company and GQM LLC have no mine safety violations to report.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit
No.
Description of ExhibitManner of Filing

3.1

Notice of Articles

Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.03 to the Form S-3 of
the Company, filed with the SEC
on August 21, 2014

3.2

Articles

Incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.2 to the Form 8-K of the
Company, filed with the SEC on
September 2, 2010

10.1

Employment Agreement between the Company and H. Lutz Klingmann dated May 1, 2015

Filed herewith

10.1

10.2

AmendmentAmended and Restated Term Loan Agreement dated June 8, 2015 among the Company, The Landon T. Clay 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated March 6, 2009, EHT, LLC, Harris Clay and The Clay Family 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated April 14, 2009

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of the Company, filed with the SEC on June 9, 2015

10.3

Amended and Restated Guaranty dated June 8, 2015 among Golden Queen Mining Holdings Inc., Golden Queen Mining Canada Ltd., The Landon T. Clay 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated March 6, 2009, EHT, LLC, Harris Clay and The Clay Family 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated April 14, 2009

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K of the Company, filed with the SEC on June 9, 2015

10.4

Amended and Restated Pledge Agreement betweendated June 8, 2015 among the Company, Golden Queen Mining Holdings Inc., Golden Queen Mining Canada Ltd., The Landon T. Clay 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated March 6, 2009, EHT, LLC, Harris Clay and Jonathan C.The Clay dated February 27,Family 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated April 14, 2009

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K of the Company, filed with the SEC on June 9, 2015

10.5

Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated June 8, 2015 among the Company, The Landon T. Clay 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated March 6, 2009, EHT, LLC, Harris Clay and The Clay Family 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated April 14, 2009

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 8-K of the Company, filed with the SEC on June 9, 2015

29


Filed herewith

10.6

Amended and Restated Option Agreement dated June 8, 2015 among Gauss LLC, Gauss Holdings LLC, Auvergne, LLC, The Landon T. Clay 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated March 6, 2009, EHT, LLC, Harris Clay, The Clay Family 2009 Irrevocable Trust Dated April 14, 2009, Golden Queen Mining Canada Ltd. and Golden Queen Mining Holdings Inc.

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 8-K of the Company, filed with the SEC on June 9, 2015

10.7

Indemnity Agreement between the Company and the Clay Family Holders dated June 8, 2015

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Form 8-K of the Company, filed with the SEC on June 9, 2015

10.8

Form of Share Purchase Warrants of the Company dated June 8, 2015

Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Form 8-K of the Company, filed with the SEC on June 9, 2015

31.1

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed herewith

31.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed herewith

32.1

Section 1350 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer

Filed herewith

32.2

Section 1350 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer

Filed herewith

101

Financial Statements from the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the three months ended March 31,June 30, 2015, formatted in XBRL

Filed herewith

2630


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 11,August 10, 2015
 

GOLDEN QUEEN MINING CO. LTD.

 

(Registrant)

   
   
   
 By:       /s/ H. Lutz Klingmann

/s/ Thomas M. Clay

  H. Lutz KlingmannThomas M. Clay
  Principal Executive Officer
   
   
   
 By:         /s/

/s/ Andrée St-Germain

  Andrée St-Germain
  Principal Financial Officer

2731