UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

 
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006March 31, 2007
��
OR
 
 
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number: 000-27945

asilogo
ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware
 
75-2900905
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)


16250 Dallas Parkway, Suite 100, Dallas, Texas
 
75248
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: 972-250-0945

16250 Dallas Parkway, Suite 205 Dallas, TexasN/A
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x   No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).Large accelerated filer o  Accelerated filer  o     Non-Accelerated filer x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o   No x

At November 9, 2006May 11, 2007 there were approximately 22,508,17022,600,510 shares of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. common stock outstanding.
 





ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2006March 31, 2007


 
PART I. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Page
   
   
   
   
   
 
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
 
   
   
   



-1-


ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
(000's omitted, except par value and share amounts)
 
  
  
September 30,
 
December 31,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
  
(Unaudited)
   
ASSETS
     
Current assets:     
Cash and cash equivalents $2,278 $3,221 
Trade accounts receivable, net  4,351  5,108 
Other receivables  175  171 
Receivable from affiliates  53  85 
Inventories  2,837  2,826 
Prepaid expenses  681  452 
Total current assets  10,375  11,863 
Property and equipment, net  1,085  1,223 
Goodwill  7,299  7,299 
Other intangible assets  178  426 
Equity method investments  663  1,086 
Other assets  275  101 
Total assets
 
$
19,875
 
$
21,998
 
        
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
       
Current liabilities:       
Accounts payable $3,544 $3,456 
Accrued liabilities  2,305  2,852 
Notes payable, current  6,074  1,049 
Total current liabilities  11,923  7,357 
Notes payable, long-term  4,336  10,874 
Minority interests  922  694 
Total liabilities
  
17,181
  
18,925
 
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 7 & 8)       
        
Stockholders' equity:       
Common stock, $0.0001 par value:       
Authorized shares--50,000,000       
Issued and outstanding shares--22,461,295 and 22,180,900   
at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.  2  2 
Additional paid-in capital  60,173  60,078 
Deferred compensation  (30) (66)
Accumulated deficit  (57,451) (56,941)
Total stockholders' equity
  
2,694
  
3,073
 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
 
$
19,875
 
$
21,998
 
        
See accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 
(000's omitted, except par value and share amounts)
 
      
  
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
  
2007
 
2006
 
  
(Unaudited)
   
ASSETS
 
      
Cash and cash equivalents $2,091 $2,686 
Trade accounts receivable, net  4,622  5,339 
Other receivables  100  387 
Receivable from affiliates  63  66 
Inventories, net  3,096  2,832 
Prepaid expenses  621  637 
Total current assets  10,593  11,947 
Property and equipment, net  978  1,019 
Goodwill  7,299  7,299 
Other intangible assets  13  95 
Equity method investments  353  419 
Other assets  257  260 
Total assets
 
$
19,493
 
$
21,039
 
        
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
        
Accounts payable $1,865 $2,293 
Accrued liabilities  2,702  3,634 
Notes payable, current  2,380  6,106 
Total current liabilities  6,947  12,033 
Notes payable, long-term  6,814  3,824 
Minority interests  955  947 
Total liabilities
  
14,716
  
16,804
 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)       
        
Stockholders' equity:       
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized; 22,549,836 and 22,508,170 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively
  2  2 
Additional paid-in capital  60,195  60,176 
Deferred compensation  (20) (25)
Accumulated deficit  (55,400) (55,918)
Total stockholders' equity
  
4,777
  
4,235
 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
 
$
19,493
 
$
21,039
 
        
See accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


-2-



 
ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
 
(000's omitted, except share and per share amounts)
(000's omitted, except share and per share amounts)
 
(000's omitted, except share and per share amounts)
 
(Unaudited)
(Unaudited)
 
(Unaudited)
 
         
 
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
      
 
September 30,
 
September 30,
  
Three Months Ended
 
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
  
March 31,
 
   
(Restated)
   
(Restated)
  
2007
 
2006
 
Revenue:              
Healthcare $10,012 $9,559 $29,972 $29,276  $10,772 $9,961 
Real estate advisory services  1,971  2,464  8,504  8,593   3,885  3,664 
  11,983  12,023  38,476  37,869   14,657  13,625 
Cost of sales:                    
Healthcare  6,929  6,468  21,061  19,795   7,127  6,931 
Real estate advisory services  1,130  1,423  5,071  5,254   2,514  2,124 
  8,059  7,891  26,132  25,049   9,641  9,055 
Gross profit  3,924  4,132  12,344  12,820   5,016  4,570 
                    
Operating expenses:                    
Selling, general and administrative expenses  3,739  4,087  11,835  12,343   4,026  4,191 
Non-cash stock compensation  33  23  51  58   5  9 
Depreciation and amortization  183  174  534  496   166  158 
Total operating expenses  3,955  4,284  12,420  12,897   4,197  4,358 
Operating loss  (31) (152) (76) (77)
Operating income  819  212 
Equity in income (losses) of equity method investees  (66) (95)
Other income  1  6 
Interest income (expense), net  (166) (184)
Income (loss) before minority interest and income tax provision  588  (61)
Minority interest  (8) (27)
Income tax provision  (62) (54)
Net income (loss) $518 $(142)
                    
Equity in losses of equity method investees  (84) (75) (300) (211)
Other income  140  20  344  58 
Interest expense, net  (199) (198) (579) (564)
Loss before minority interest and income tax provision  (174) (405) (611) (794)
Minority interest loss / (income) allocation  -  -  (31) 29 
Income tax provision  13  47  98  125 
Loss from continuing operations  (187) (452) (740) (890)
             
Discontinued operations  -  (230) 230  (230)
             
Net loss $(187)$(682)$(510)$(1,120)
             
Basic net loss per share             
Continuing operations  (0.01) (0.02) (0.03) (0.04)
Discontinued operations  -  (0.01) 0.01  (0.01)
 $(0.01)$(0.03)$(0.02)$(0.05)
Diluted net loss per share             
Continuing operations  (0.01) (0.02) (0.03) (0.04)
Discontinued operations  -  (0.01) 0.01  (0.01)
Basic net income (loss) per share $0.02 $(0.01)
Diluted net income (loss) per share $0.02 $(0.01)
 $(0.01)$(0.03)$(0.02)$(0.05)       
                    
Average common shares outstanding, basic  22,454,628  22,014,233  22,436,456  21,970,900   22,549,836  22,258,173 
Average common shares outstanding, diluted  22,454,628  22,014,233  22,436,456  21,970,900   22,731,325  22,782,735 
       
See accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.



-3-



ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
 
ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
(000's omitted)
(000's omitted)
 
(000's omitted)
 
(Unaudited)
 
     
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2006
 
2005
  
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
   
(Restated)
  
2007
 
2006
 
Operating Activities
      
 (Unaudited)
 
 (Unaudited)
 
Net loss $(510)$(1,120)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:       
     
Net income (loss) $518 $(142)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash       
provided by (used in) operating activities:       
Provision for doubtful accounts  397  324   70  44 
Depreciation and amortization  534  496   166  158 
Deferred compensation amortization  51  58   5  9 
Issuance of stock in lieu of directors fees  32  -   19  8 
Non-cash equity in losses (income) of equity method investees:       
Non-cash equity in losses (income) of equity method investees      
Fairways Frisco, LP  373  442   97  130 
Ampco Partners  (73) - 
Income from early extinguishment of debt  (100) - 
Loss on sale of property and equipment  7  1 
Ampco Partners, Ltd.  (31) - 
Fairways 03 New Jersey, LP  -  (35)
Minority interest  31  (29)  8  27 
Discontinued operations  (230) 230 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:             
Accounts receivable  360  1,145   647  145 
Inventories  (11) (294)  (264) (41)
Prepaid expenses and other assets  (375) 43   308  (2)
Accounts payable  88  554   (428) (859)
Accrued liabilities  (547) (906)  (932) (274)
Net cash provided by continuing operations  27  944 
Net cash provided by discontinued operations  230  (230)
Net cash provided by operating activities  257  714 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  183  (832)
              
Investing Activities
              
       
Distributions from limited partnerships  85  85   -  24 
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment  6  -   -  (80)
Purchases of property and equipment  (161) (854)  (42) - 
Distributions to limited partners  (33) - 
Investment in limited partnerships  -  (1,065)
Net cash used in investing activities  (103) (1,834)  (42) (56)
              
See accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements   
Financing Activities
       
       
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options  -  48 
Payments on notes payable  (4,934) (1,085)
Proceeds from notes payable  4,198  150 
Net cash used in financing activities  (736) (887)
       
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (595) (1,775)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year  2,686  3,221 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $2,091 $1,446 
       
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
       
Cash paid for income taxes $31 $47 
Cash paid for interest on notes payable $160 $157 

See accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.
-4-



ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
 
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 
(000's omitted)
 
(Unaudited)
 
      
  
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
    
(Restated)
 
Financing Activities
     
Proceeds from exercise of common stock options  48  24 
Proceeds from sale of limited partnership interests  230  230 
Payments on notes payable  (2,360) (412)
Proceeds from notes payable  985  255 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  (1,097) 97 
        
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents  (943) (1,023)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period $3,221 $1,868 
        
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $2,278 $845 
       
Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
       
Cash paid for income taxes $137 $201 
Cash paid for interest on notes payable $565 $593 
Noncash investing activities:
       
Indemnification liability recorded $- $220 
Noncash financing activities:
     
Partnership distributions applied to note payable $38 $- 
        
See accompanying notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements   





-5-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



1.
Basis of Presentation

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included herein reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which in the opinion of management are necessary to fairly state Ascendant Solutions, Inc.’s (“Ascendant Solutions” or the “Company”) consolidated financial position, consolidated results of operations and consolidated cash flows for the periods presented. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20052006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The consolidated results of operations for the three and nine month periodsquarter ended September 30, 2006March 31, 2007 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any subsequent quarter or for the entire fiscal year ending December 31, 2006.2007. The December 31, 20052006 consolidated balance sheet was derived from audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Terms not otherwise defined herein shall have the meaning given to them in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20052006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Restatement

The Company previously restated its condensed consolidated financial statements included herein to reflect a change in the accounting for its investment in Fairways Frisco, L.P.(“Fairways Frisco”) from the cost method to the equity method of accounting. As of September 30, 2005, the Company owned approximately 15% of the limited partnership interests in Fairways Frisco. The Company originally used the cost method to account for its investment in Fairways Frisco because it believed its investment was minor, it had no influence over the operations or financial policies of Fairways Frisco and it has no obligation to fund the operating losses or debts of Fairways Frisco. However, under EITF Topic D-46, the SEC considers all investments of greater than 3 to 5 percent in real estate limited partnerships to be more than minor, and therefore must be accounted for under the equity method.

The restatement records the Company’s equity in the net loss of Fairways Frisco for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005 as a reduction of its investment on the accompanying condensed balance sheet and as a loss from equity method investments in the accompanying condensed statements of operations.

This adjustment had no impact on the net change in cash and cash equivalents for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005. The adjustment also has no impact on the Company’s obligations to fund any operating losses or debts of Fairways Frisco. The Company is not obligated under the Fairways Frisco limited partnership agreement to fund any operating losses or debts of Fairways Frisco.

The following is a summary of the changes to the condensed consolidated financial statements:

  
As of September 30, 2005
 
  Restated Previously 
  Amount Reported 
      
Balance Sheet:
     
Equity method investments $1,168,000 $1,610,000 
Total assets  19,627,000  20,069,000 
Total stockholders' equity  1,841,000  2,283,000 
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity  19,627,000  20,069,000 


-6-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



          
  
Three Months Ended September 30, 2005
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
 
  Restated Previously Restated Previously 
  Amount Reported Amount Reported 
Statement of Operations:
         
Investment income $- $97,000 $- $290,000 
Equity in income (losses) of equity method investees  (75,000) -  (211,000) - 
Other income  20,000  -  58,000  - 
Net loss  (682,000) (530,000) (1,120,000) (678,000)
Basic net loss per share $(0.03)$(0.02)$(0.05)$(0.03)
Diluted net loss per share $(0.03)$(0.02)$(0.05)$(0.03)

      
  
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005
 
  Restated Previously 
  Amount Reported 
Statement of Cash Flows:
     
Net loss $(1,120,000)$(678,000)
Loss from equity method investments  442,000  - 

2.
Description of Business

Ascendant Solutions is a diversified financial services company which is seeking to or has invested in or acquired, healthcare, manufacturing, distribution or service companies. The Company also conducts various real estate activities, performing real estate advisory services for corporate clients, and, through an affiliate, purchases real estate assets, as a principal investor.

The following is a summary of the Company’s identifiable business segments, consolidated subsidiaries and their related business activities:

Business Segment
 
Subsidiaries
 
Principal Business Activity
     
Healthcare Dougherty’s Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries (“DHI”) Healthcare products and services provided through retail pharmacies, including specialty compounding pharmacy services and home infusion therapy centers
     
Real estate advisory services 
CRESA Partners of Orange County, L.P.,
ASDS of Orange County, Inc.,
CRESA Capital Markets Group, L.P.
 Tenant representation, lease management services, capital markets advisory services and strategic real estate advisory services
     
Corporate & other 
Ascendant Solutions, Inc.,
ASE Investments Corporation
 Corporate administration, investments in Ampco Partners, Ltd., Fairways Frisco, L.P. and Fairways 03 New Jersey, L.P.

During 2002, the Company made its first investments, and it has continued to make additional investments and acquisitions throughout 2003, 2004 and 2005.

-7--5-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



A summary of the Company’s investment and acquisition activity is shown in the table below:

Date
 
Entity
 
Business Segment
 
Transaction Description
 
%
Ownership
         
April 2002 Ampco Partners, Ltd Corporate & other Investment in a non-sparking, non-magnetic safety tool manufacturing company 10%
         
August 2002 VTE, L.P. Corporate & other Investment to acquire early stage online electronic ticket exchange company 23%
         
October 2002 
CRESA Capital Markets Group, L.P.,
ASE Investments Corporation
 Real estate advisory services Investment to form real estate capital markets and strategic advisory services companies 80%
         
November 2003 Fairways 03 New Jersey, L.P. Corporate & other Investment in a single tenant office building 20%
         
March 2004 Dougherty’s Holdings, Inc. and Subsidiaries Healthcare Acquisition of specialty pharmacies and therapy infusion centers 100%
         
April 2004 Fairways 36864, L.P. Corporate & other Investment in commercial real estate properties 24.75%
         
May 2004 
CRESA Partners of Orange County, L.P.,
ASDS of Orange County, Inc.
 Real estate advisory services Acquisition of tenant representation and other real estate advisory services company 99%
         
December 2004 Fairways Frisco, L.P. Corporate & other Investment in a mixed-use real estate development 
9%8.87%1

1 The Company was the initial limited partner in Fairways Frisco, L.P. (“Fairways Frisco”), which obtained a 50% ownership interest in the Frisco Square Partnerships on December 31, 2004. Fairways Frisco L.P. subsequently sold additional limited partnership interests and the Company now owns approximately 9%8.87% of Fairways Frisco, L.P. In April 2007, the general partner of the Frisco Square Partnerships made a capital call of the limited partners in the amount of $5 million, which the Company did not participate in. This capital call was fully funded and as a result the Company‘s limited partnership interest was reduced to approximately 5.8%.

Certain of these transactions involved related parties or affiliates as more fully described in the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.2006.

The Company will continue to look for acquisition opportunities, however, its current cash resources are limited and it will be required to expend significant executive time to assist the management of its acquired businesses. The Company will continue seeking to (1) most effectively deploy its remaining cash and debt capacity (if any) and (2) capitalize on the experience and contacts of its officers and directors.

Please see Note 10 “Business Segment Information” in the notes hereto for additional information.

-8--6-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

PrincipalsPrinciples of Consolidation
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Ascendant Solutions and all subsidiaries for which the Company has significant influence over operations. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The limited partnership interests for the subsidiaries and related minority interests are included on the balance sheet as Minority Interests.

Use of Estimates
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, including allowance for doubtful accounts and inventory reserves. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  

Equity Method Investments
Equity method investments represent investments in limited partnerships accounted for using the equity method of accounting for investments, and none represent investments in publicly traded companies. The equity method is used as the Company does not have a majority interest and does not have significant influence over the operations of the respective companies. The Company also uses the equity method for investments in real estate limited partnerships where it owns more than 3% to 5% of the limited partnership interests. Accordingly, the Company records its proportionate share of the income or losses generated by equity method investees in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. If the Company receives distributions in excess of its equity in earnings, they are recorded as a reduction of its investment.

Revenue Recognition
Healthcare revenues are reported at the estimated net realizable amounts expected to be received from individuals, third-party payors, institutional healthcare providers and others. The Company recognizes revenue from the sale of pharmaceutical products and retail merchandise as transactions occur and product is delivered to the customer. Revenue from product sales is recognized at the point of sale and service revenue is recognized at the time services are provided.

Real estate advisory services revenue is primarily from brokerage commissions earned from project leasing and tenant representation transactions. Brokerage commission revenue is generally recorded upon execution of a lease contract, unless additional activities are required to earn the commission pursuant to a specific brokerage commission agreement. Participation interests in rental income are recognized over the life of the lease. Other revenue is recognized as the following consulting services are provided: facility and site acquisition and disposition, lease management, design, construction and development consulting, move coordination and strategic real estate advisory services. Participation interests in rental income are recognized over the life of the lease.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share  
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share is computed based on the net income (loss) applicable to common stockholders divided by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. The number of dilutive shares resulting from assumed conversion of stock options and warrants are determined by using the treasury stock method.   See Note 4 for more information regarding the calculation of net income (loss) per share.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement No. 123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions such as options, restricted share plans, performance based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans be recognized at fair value in financial statements.

Statement 123R replaces FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Statement 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that statement permitted entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance in Opinion 25, as long as the footnotes to the financial statements disclosed what net income would have been had the preferable fair-value-based method been used.

-9--7-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements




The Company currently expenses the cost of restricted shares issued to employees and directors over the service vesting period associated with the restricted shares. The Company currently has no options outstanding which are not vested. The unrecognized compensation cost related to these options is not material and as a result, the implementation of Statement 123R in the first quarter of 2006 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations. See Note 9 for additional disclosures under Statement 123R.

The Company accounts for its employee stock options and stock based awards under the fair value provisions of Statement 123R, which was adopted effective January 1, 2006, whereby stock-based compensation is measured at the grant date based on the value of the awards and is recognized as expense over the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). See Note 9 for additional information about the Company’s Stock Based Compensation.Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2006, the State of Texas replaced the current franchise tax system with a new Texas Margin Tax (“TMT”). The TMT is a 1% gross receipts tax based on the Company’s taxable margin, as defined by the new law. However, for taxable entities primarily engaged in retail and wholesale trade, the rate is 0.5% of taxable margin. The Company is currently evaluatinghas evaluated the impact of the TMT which is effectiveon our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows and has concluded that the TMT does not appear it will have a material impact on its results of operations.
Effective January 1, 2008.

In June 2006,2007, we adopted the provisions of FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with early adoption permitted.- An Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN 48 clarifiesprovides detailed guidance for the accounting for uncertaintyfinancial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in income taxes recognizedthe financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, by providing a recognition threshold and measurement guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. We are inTax positions must meet a “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold at the process of evaluating the impact ofeffective date to be recognized upon the adoption of this interpretation on our consolidated financial position, resultsFIN 48 and in subsequent periods.
Upon the adoption of operations or cash flows.FIN 48, we had no unrecognized tax benefits. During the first quarter of 2007, we recognized no adjustments for uncertain tax benefits. We recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense; however, no interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions were accrued at March 31, 2007. The tax years 2003 through 2006 remain open to examination by the major taxing jurisdictions in which we operate. We expect no material changes to unrecognized tax positions within the next twelve months

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any,any; the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 ("SAB 108"), "Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements." SAB 108 was issued to provide consistency in how registrants quantify financial statement misstatements. The Company is required to and will initially apply SAB 108 in connection with the preparation of its annual financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2006. The Company does not expect the application of SAB 108 to have a material effect on its financial position and results of operations.

Reclassifications
Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. 

 
Discontinued Operations

As disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 24, 2006, the board of directors decided to retain the operations of Park InfusionCare, which had previously been reported as a discontinued operation while the Company was pursuing a potential disposition or strategic transaction for its infusion therapy business. In connection with the decision to retain the operations of Park InfusionCare, DHI entered into an employment agreement on May 18, 2006 with Scott R. Holtmyer to be the Vice President of its Park InfusionCare infusion therapy business.

The Company began reporting the results of Park InfusionCare as a discontinued operation in its September 30, 2005 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. As a result of the board of directors decision to retain the operations of Park InfusionCare, the Company has reported the operating results of Park InfusionCare as part of continuing operations in its June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006 quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

The Company had previously recorded an estimated charge of $230,000 for employee retention costs directly related to any potential disposition or strategic transaction for Park InfusionCare.

-10-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


As no such transaction was consummated, none of these retention costs were paid and the Company has recorded a reversal of this accrual as part of results from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006. All otherall Park InfusionCare amounts in this Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,March 31, 2007 and 2006 and 2005 have been reported as part of continuing operations. 

Critical accounting policies not otherwise included herein are included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20052006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

-8-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



3.
Trade Accounts Receivable

Trade accounts receivable consist of the following:

 
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
 
September 30,
 
December 31,
  
2007
 
2006
 
 
2006
 
2005
  
(Unaudited)
   
Healthcare:
          
Trade accounts receivable $3,616,000 $3,878,000  $3,289,000 $3,268,000 
Less - allowance for doubtful accounts  (549,000) (596,000)  (361,000) (318,000)
  3,067,000  3,282,000   2,928,000  2,950,000 
Real Estate Advisory Services:
              
Trade accounts receivable  1,284,000  1,826,000   1,694,000  2,389,000 
Less - allowance for doubtful accounts  -  -   -  - 
  1,284,000  1,826,000   1,694,000  2,389,000 
              
 $4,351,000 $5,108,000  $4,622,000 $5,339,000 

Healthcare trade accounts receivable consists primarily of amounts receivable from third-party payors (insurance companies and governmental agencies) under various medical reimbursement programs, institutional healthcare providers, individuals and others and are not collateralized. Certain receivables are recorded at estimated net realizable amounts. Amounts that may be received under medical reimbursement programs are affected by changes in payment criteria and are subject to legislative actions. Healthcare reduces its accounts receivable by an allowance for the amounts deemed to be uncollectible. In general, an allowance for retail pharmacy accounts aged in excess of 60 days and infusion therapy accounts aged in excess of 180 days is established. Accounts that management has ultimately determined to be uncollectible are written off against the allowance.

Healthcare accounts receivable from Medicare and Medicaid combined were approximately 17.9%8.5% and 18.1%13.3% of total accounts receivable at September 30, 2006March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2005,2006, respectively. Additionally, at DecemberMarch 31, 2005,2007 Healthcare had accounts receivable outstanding from one insurance company of approximately 13.1%10.3% of total Healthcare accounts receivable. No other single customer or third-party payor accounted for more than 10% of Healthcare’s accounts receivable at September 30, 2006March 31, 2007 or December 31, 2005,2006, respectively. In addition, for the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, the Healthcare operations did not derive revenue in excess of ten percent from any single customer.

The Company’s real estate advisory services operations grant credit to customers of various sizes and provide an allowance for doubtful accounts equal to the estimated uncollectible amounts based on historical collection experience and a review of the current status of trade accounts receivable. At March 31, 2007, the Company’s real estate advisor services operations had accounts receivable outstanding from two customers of approximately 39.8% of total real estate advisor services accounts receivables. For the three months ended September 30, 2006,March 31, 2007, the Company’s real estate advisory services operations derived revenues in excess of ten percent from three customers totaling approximately $1,206,000$2,439,000 which represents 61.2%62.8% of total real estate advisory services revenue, and it derived revenues in excess of ten percent from two customersone customer totaling $1,366,000,$1,536,000, which represents 56.1%47% of total real estate advisory services revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2005.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, the Company’s real estate advisory services operations derived revenues in excess of ten percent from one customer totaling approximately $3,058,000 which represents 37.5% of total real estate advisory services revenue and from one customer totaling approximately $2,743,000, which represents 32.1% of total real estate advisory services revenue, respectively.March 31, 2006.

-11--9-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



4. Computation of Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic lossnet income (loss) per common share is based on the net lossincome (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted lossnet income (loss) per common share is based on the net lossincome (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares including equivalent common shares of dilutive common stock options and warrants outstanding during the period. No effect has been given to outstanding options or warrants in the diluted computation for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, as their effect would be anti-dilutive due to the net loss.

The number of potentially dilutive stock options and warrants excluded from the computation for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,March 31, 2006 was approximately 308,785 and 430,699 in 2006 and 956,000 and 973,000 in 2005, respectively.524,562. A reconciliation of basic and diluted lossnet income (loss) per common share follows:

  
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
          
Loss from continuing operations, net of taxes $(187,000)$(452,000)$(740,000)$(890,000)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes  -  (230,000) 230,000  (230,000)
Net loss $(187,000)$(682,000)$(510,000)$(1,120,000)
              
Weighted average common shares outstanding-Basic  22,454,628  22,014,233  22,436,456  21,970,900 
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants  -  -  -  - 
Weighted average common shares outstanding-Diluted  22,454,628  22,014,233  22,436,456  21,970,900 
              
Basic earnings per share from:             
Continuing operations $(0.01)$(0.02)$(0.03)$(0.04)
Discontinued operations  -  (0.01) 0.01  (0.01)
Basic net loss per share $(0.01)$(0.03)$(0.02)$(0.05)
              
Diluted earnings per share from:             
Continuing operations $(0.01)$(0.02)$(0.03)$(0.04)
Discontinued operations  -  (0.01) 0.01  (0.01)
Diluted net loss per share $(0.01)$(0.03)$(0.02)$(0.05)
  
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
  
2007
 
2006
 
  
(Unaudited)
 
(Unaudited)
 
      
Net income (loss) $518,000 $(142,000)
        
Weighted average common shares outstanding-Basic  22,549,836  22,258,173 
Effect of dilutive stock options and warrants  181,489  524,562 
Weighted average common shares outstanding-Diluted  22,731,325  22,782,735 
        
Basic net income (loss) per share $0.02 $(0.01)
Diluted net income (loss) per share $0.02 $(0.01)

5.
Equity Method Investments

Equity method investments consists of the following:

 
Ownership
 
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
 
Ownership
 
September 30,
 
December 31,
   % 
2007
 
2006
 
 
 %
 
2006
 
2005
    
(Unaudited)
   
              
Ampco Partners, Ltd.  10% $192,000 $242,000   10% $225,000 $194,000 
Fairways 03 New Jersey, L.P.  20%  162,000  162,000 
Fairways Frisco, LP  9%  309,000  682,000   8.87%  128,000  225,000 
    $663,000 $1,086,000     $353,000 $419,000 

Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees shown in the condensed consolidated statements of operations comprised the following:

  
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
  
2007
 
2006
 
  
(Unaudited)
 
(Unaudited)
 
      
Ampco Partners, Ltd. $31,000 $35,000 
Fairways Frisco, L.P.  (97,000) (130,000)
  $(66,000)$(95,000)

The Company’s investment in Fairways Frisco includes its cumulative cash investment of $1,219,000 and its cumulative equity in the losses of Fairways Frisco of ($1,091,000). The Company received no distributions from Fairways Frisco during the three month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.

-12--10-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Equity in earnings (losses) of equity method investees shown in the condensed consolidated statements of operations comprised the following:
  
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
          
Ampco Partners, Ltd. $5,000 $35,000 $73,000 $95,000 
Fairways 03 New Jersey, LP  -  42,000  -  136,000 
Fairways Frisco, L.P.  (89,000) (152,000) (373,000) (442,000)
  $(84,000)$(75,000)$(300,000)$(211,000)

The Company’s investment in Fairways Frisco includes its cumulative cash investment of $1,219,000 and its cumulative equity in the losses of Fairways Frisco of ($910,000). The Company received no distributions from Fairways Frisco during the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Summarized unaudited financial information for Fairways Frisco is included below:
  
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
  
2007
 
2006
 
  
(Unaudited)
   
      
Total assets $58,749,000 $58,061,000 
Notes payable  58,598,000  55,568,000 
Total partners' capital  715,000  1,695,000 
Total liabilities and partnership capital  62,850,000  61,837,000 

  
September 30,
 
December 31,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
      
Total assets $58,150,000 $54,551,000 
Notes payable  53,820,000  51,703,000 
Total partnership capital  2,216,000  1,401,000 
Total liabilities and partnership capital $58,150,000 $54,551,000 


 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
  
2007
 
2006
 
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
  
(Unaudited)
 
(Unaudited)
 
              
Total revenue $770,000 $519,000 $1,972,000 $830,000  $999,000 $628,000 
Operating expenses  1,825,000  1,694,000  4,897,000  3,847,000   1,664,000  1,477,000 
Interest expense  599,000  544,000  2,075,000  966,000   778,000  778,000 
Equity in losses of Frisco Square Partnerships  -  -  -  (622,000)
Minority interest  650,000  688,000  1,521,000  1,576,000   325,000  537,000 
Net loss $(1,004,000)$(1,031,000)$(3,479,000)$(3,029,000) $(1,118,000)$(1,090,000)

6.
Prepaid Expenses

Prepaid expenses consist of the following:
 
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
 
September 30,
 
December 31,
  
2007
 
2006
 
 
2006
 
2005
  
(Unaudited)
   
          
Prepaid insurance $161,000 $168,000  $97,000 $179,000 
Deferred tenant representation costs  425,000  94,000   278,000  364,000 
Prepaid marketing costs  2,000  13,000   49,000  13,000 
Prepaid rent  -  62,000   67,000  - 
Other prepaid expenses  93,000  115,000   130,000  81,000 
 $681,000 $452,000  $621,000 $637,000 

The Company’s real estate advisory services operations defer direct costs associated with its tenant representation services until such time a lease is signed between the tenant and landlord. Upon execution of a signed lease, the Company expenses 50% of these direct costs associated with the transactions, with the balance being paid by the individual broker through a reduction in the commission earned. The Company regularly reviews these direct costs and expenses the costs related to canceled or unlikely to be completed transactions.

-13--11-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


7. Notes Payable
Notes payable consist of the following:
  
September 30,
 
December 31,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
Bank of Texas Credit Facility, secured by substantially all healthcare assets
     
Term note A in the principal amount of $1,000,000, interest at 6% per annum payable monthly, principal due in full in March 2007. $509,000 $528,000 
Term note B in the principal amount of $4,000,000, interest at 6% per annum, principal and interest payable in monthly installments of $44,408 over 35 months with a balloon payment of principal due in March 2007.  3,226,000  3,471,000 
Term note C in the principal amount of $529,539, interest at 6% per annum, principal and interest payable in monthly installments of $5,579 over 35 months with a balloon payment of principal due in March 2007.  427,000  459,000 
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, unsecured note payable
       
Unsecured note in the principal amount of $750,000, interest at 6% per annum, principal and interest payable in monthly installments of $6,329 over 59 months with a balloon payment of principal of $576,000 due in March 2009.  667,000  693,000 
Insurance premium finance note payable
       
Term note in the principal amount of $150,000, payable in 9 equal installments of $17,098 through January 2007, interest payable at the fixed rate of 6.25%, secured by DHI's property & casualty insurance policies.  51,000  - 
CPOC Acquisition Note payable to Kevin Hayes
       
Acquisition note in the principal amount of $6,900,000 due May 1, 2007, interest at Northern Trust Bank prime rate plus 0.5%, payable monthly, principal payable quarterly from the Company's equity interest in the operating cashflow of CPOC and secured by the assets of CPOC.  -  6,182,000 
CPOC term note payable to First Republic Bank
       
Term note in the principal amount of $5.3 million, due June 1, 2009, interest at Bank of America prime rate minus 0.25% (8.00% at September 30, 2006) payable monthly, principal of $300,000 payable quarterly with a balloon payment of $1,700,000 due on June 1, 2009 and secured by the assets of CPOC.  4,900,000  - 
Capital lease obligations, secured by equipment
  163,000  266,000 
Comerica Bank term note payable
       
Term note payable in the principal amount of $30,000, payable in 36 equal installments of $928 through April 2008, interest payable at the fixed rate of 7%, secured by all property and equipment of Ascendant Solutions, Inc.  17,000  23,000 
Unsecured term note payable in the principal amount of $225,000, interest only payable monthly at the Comerica Bank prime rate plus 1.00% (8.25% at December 31, 2005), principal paid in full in January 2006.  -  225,000 
Demand note payable to affiliate
       
Demand note payable to Ampco Partners, Ltd., interest at Bank of Texas prime rate plus 4.00% (12.25% at September 30, 2006), secured by the Company's distributions from and partnership interest in Ampco Partners, Ltd., principal and accrued interest due on demand.  450,000  - 
Insurance premium finance note payable
       
Term note payable in the principal amount of $86,250, payable in 9 equal installments of $9,804 through August 2006, interest payable at the fixed rate of 5.50%, secured by the Company's directors & officers insurance policies.  -  76,000 
   10,410,000  11,923,000 
Less current portion  (6,074,000) (1,049,000)
  $4,336,000 $10,874,000 
  
March 31,
 
December 31,
 
  
2007
 
2006
 
  
(Unaudited)
   
Amegy Bank National Association Credit Facility, secured by certain healthcare assets
     
Term note in the principal amount of $2,200,000, interest at Amegy Bank National Association prime plus 0.25% (8.50% at March 31, 2007) payable monthly in installments of $45,833 plus interest, all outstanding principal plus all accrued and unpaid interest is due in full in February 2011. $2,154,000 $- 
Revolving line of credit in the principal amount of $2,000,000, interest at Amegy Bank National Association prime (8.25% at March 31, 2007) interest payable monthly, principal due in full in February 2009.  1,998,000  - 
Bank of Texas Credit Facility, secured by substantially all healthcare assets
       
Term note A in the principal amount of $1,000,000, interest at 6% per annum payable monthly, principal due in full in March 2007. Paid in full in February 2007.  -  659,000 
Term note B in the principal amount of $4,000,000, interest at 6% per annum, principal and interest payable in monthly installments of $44,408 over 35 months with a balloon payment of principal due in March 2007. Paid in full in February 2007.  -  3,140,000 
Term note C in the principal amount of $529,539, interest at 6% per annum, principal and interest payable in monthly installments of $5,579 over 35 months with a balloon payment of principal due in March 2007. Paid in full in February 2007.  -  416,000 
AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation, unsecured note payable
       
Unsecured note in the principal amount of $750,000, interest at 6% per annum, principal and interest payable in monthly installments of $6,329 over 59 months with a balloon payment of principal of $576,000 due in March 2009.  649,000  658,000 
CPOC term note payable to First Republic Bank
       
Term note in the principal amount of $5.3 million, due June 1, 2009, interest at Bank of America prime rate minus 0.25% (8.00% at March 31, 2007) payable monthly, principal of $300,000 payable quarterly with a balloon payment of $1,700,000 due on June 1, 2009 and secured by the assets of CPOC.  3,800,000  4,400,000 
Capital lease obligations, secured by office equipment
  95,000  129,000 
Demand note payable to affiliate
       
Demand note payable to Ampco Partners, Ltd., interest at Bank of Texas prime rate plus 4.00% (12.25% at March 31, 2006), secured by the Company's distributions from and partnership interest in Ampco Partners, Ltd., principal and accrued interest due on demand.  440,000  440,000 
Comerica Bank term note payable
       
Term note payable in the principal amount of $30,000, payable in 36 equal installments of $928 through April 2008, interest payable at the fixed rate of 7.00%, secured by all property and equipment of Ascendant Solutions, Inc.  11,000  14,000 
Insurance premium finance notes payable
       
Term note payable in the principal amount of $82,875, payable in 9 equal installments of $9,450 through August 2007, interest payable at the fixed rate of 6.25%, secured by the Company's directors and officers insurance policies.  47,000  74,000 
   9,194,000  9,930,000 
Less current portion  (2,380,000) (6,106,000)
  $6,814,000 $3,824,000 

-14--12-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


The aggregate maturities of notes payable for the 12 months ended September 30March 31 are as follows:

2007 $6,074,000 
2008  1,245,000  $2,380,000 
2009  3,091,000   4,360,000 
2010  1,950,000 
2011  504,000 
Thereafter  - 
 $10,410,000  $9,194,000 

On February 20, 2007, Dougherty’s Pharmacy, Inc., Alvin Medicine Man, LP, Angleton Medicine Man, LP, and Santa Fe Medicine Man, LP (collectively, the “Borrowers”), each a wholly-owned subsidiary of DHI, entered into a loan agreement with Amegy Bank National Association (“Amegy Bank” or the “Lender”) for a $2,000,000 revolving line of credit (the “Amegy Revolver”) and a $2,200,000 term loan (the “Term Loan”). Substantially all of the proceeds from the Revolver and the Term Loan were used to retire the outstanding balance owed to Bank of Texas, N.A. under an existing credit facility. The Term Loan and the Amegy Revolver are being guaranteed by the Company, DHI, Medicine Man, LP, Dougherty’s LP Holdings, Inc., Medicine Man GP, LLC, Alvin Medicine Man GP, LLC, Angleton Medicine Man GP, LLC and Santa Fe Medicine Man GP, LLC.

Outstanding advances under the Amegy Revolver will bear interest at the Lender’s prime rate. Accrued and unpaid interest on the Amegy Revolver is due monthly beginning on March 20, 2007. All outstanding principal under the Amegy Revolver plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon is due and payable in full on February 20, 2009. On a monthly basis beginning on April 1, 2007, the Borrowers will pay to Lender a one-half percent per annum commitment fee on the average daily unused portion of the Revolver.

The BankTerm Loan bears interest at the Lender’s prime rate plus 0.25%. Principal payments of Texas credit facility contains$45,833 and accrued and unpaid interest on the Term Loan is due monthly beginning on March 20, 2007. All outstanding principal under the Term Loan plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon is due and payable in full on February 20, 2011.

The Term Loan and the Amegy Revolver are secured by the accounts receivable, inventory and fixed assets of the Borrowers and the stock of Dougherty’s Pharmacy, Inc. The Term Loan and the Amegy Revolver are cross-collateralized and cross-defaulted.

Both the Term Loan and the Amegy Revolver are subject to certain financial covenants including, but not limited to, a borrowing base formula with whichcap on management fees, a limit on dividends and distributions except for dividends and distributions between Borrowers or any of the Borrowers’ subsidiaries, a limit on payments of subordinated debt to the Company must comply. Ifand a limit on additional debt of the outstanding borrowings underBorrowers. Furthermore, the facility exceedloan agreement provides that the borrowing base, theBorrowers will maintain a maximum ratio of funded debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization plus certain non-recurring charges and fees (“Adjusted EBITDA”) and a minimum ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to current maturities of long term bank debt and interest. The Company is obligated to make additional principal payments to reduce the outstanding borrowings. As of September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the Company wascurrently in compliance with this borrowing base requirement. these financial covenants.

Both the First Republic Bank term note and revolving line of credit are subject to certain financial covenants including a minimum ratio of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization to debt service and a limit on annual capital expenditures. As of September 30, 2006March 31, 2007, CPOC was in compliance with these financial covenants. The Term Note is being guaranteed by CPOC. The term note and the revolver are also being personally guaranteed, subject to certain limits, by certain officers and minority limited partners of CPOC. The Company is not paying any compensation to the individuals providing these guaranties.

-13-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Subsequent Event

On April 17, 2007, Park InfusionCare, LP, Park InfusionCare of Dallas, LP, Park InfusionCare of Houston, LP and Park InfusionCare of San Antonio, LP (collectively, the “Borrowers”), each an indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. (the “Company”), entered into a loan agreement with Presidential Healthcare Credit Corporation (the “Lender”) for a $1,000,000 revolving line of credit (the “Presidential Revolver”). The Borrowers may request advances under the Presidential Revolver up to and including 85% of the net value of eligible receivables minus certain reserves.
The Presidential Revolver is being guaranteed by the Company, Dougherty’s Holdings, Inc., Dougherty’s LP Holdings, Inc., Dougherty’s Operating GP, LLC, Park InfusionCare of Dallas GP, LLC, Park InfusionCare of Houston GP, LLC, and Park InfusionCare of San Antonio GP, LLC. The Presidential Revolver is secured by the accounts receivable and related general intangibles of the Borrowers.
Outstanding advances under the Presidential Revolver will bear interest at the Lender’s prime rate plus 2% per annum but not less than the initial rate of 10.25% per annum. Accrued and unpaid interest on the Presidential Revolver is due monthly beginning on May 1, 2007. All outstanding principal under the Presidential Revolver plus all accrued and unpaid interest thereon is due and payable in full on April 17, 2010.
At closing, the Borrowers paid to Lender an initial commitment fee equal to $10,000. If the Presidential Revolver is terminated by the Borrowers on or before its first anniversary, the Borrowers will pay to Lender an early termination fee of $20,000. If the Presidential Revolver is terminated after the first anniversary and before April 17, 2010, the Borrowers will pay to Lender an early termination fee of $10,000.
Beginning on May 1, 2007, the Borrowers will pay to Lender a collateral management fee equal to one-half percent of the net realizable value of monthly receivables generated. The Presidential Revolver is subject to certain covenants including, but not limited to, a limit on additional debt of the Borrowers.
8.
Commitments and Contingencies

The Company and its subsidiaries lease its pharmacy, real estate advisory services and certain pharmacy equipment under non-cancelable operating lease agreements. Certain leases contain renewal options and provide that the Company pay taxes, insurance, maintenance and other operating expenses. Total rent expense for operating leases was approximately $386,000$351,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2006.March 31, 2007.

Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases for the twelve months ending September 30,March 31, are as follows:

Years ending March 31,
   
2007 $1,312,000  $1,270,000 
2008  1,114,000   1,175,000 
2009  1,069,000   1,083,000 
2010  977,000   725,000 
2011  327,000   344,000 
Thereafter  2,077,000   1,934,000 
 $6,876,000  $6,531,000 

OnIn September 25, 2006, the Chapter 7 trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Quantum North America, Inc. sought to enforce two default judgments against the Company for alleged preferential and fraudulent transfers to the Company's predecessor, ASD Systems, Inc. in the aggregate amount of approximately $150,000, plus interest and attorneys fees. The transfers at issue occurred in 2000. The adversary proceedings filed in the bankruptcy case were styled: David Gottlieb Trustee v. ASD Systems, Inc.; Adv. Nos. 1:02-ap-02131-GM and 1:02-ap-01948. The Company believestook the position that the judgments should be set aside aswere void since thebased on defective service of the underlying complaints was defective and neither ASD SystemsAscendant nor the CompanyASD were afforded the opportunity to defend. If the default judgments are set aside, the Company intends to defend the claims based on several available defenses.claims. The Company anticipates thatalso disputed the hearingunderlying claims and was prepared to considerfully defend the enforceability ofTrustee's suit once the judgments will be in December 2006.

were set aside.

-15--14-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



After presenting the Trustee with our defenses, the Company was able to settle the claims for a nominal payment of $5,000. The Company has a settlement in principle with the Trustee which is pending approval by the Bankruptcy Court.

9.
Stock Based Compensation

Under the Company’s 2002 Equity Incentive Plan, it can issue up to 2,000,000 shares of restricted stock to employees and non-employee directors pursuant to restricted stock agreements. Under the restricted stock agreements, the restricted shares will vest annually over a three-year period, or such other restriction period as the Company’s Board of Directors may approve.

As of September 30, 2006,March 31, 2007, the following shares had been issued under the 2002 Equity Incentive Plan:

 
Number of
 
Shares Vested
    
Number of
     
Year of Issuance:
 
Shares
 
at September 30, 2006
 
Non-Vested
  
Shares
 
Shares Vested
 
Non-Vested
 
2002  435,000  435,000  -   435,000  435,000  - 
2003  -  -  -   -  -  - 
2004  67,500  61,667  5,833   67,500  67,500  - 
2005  47,500  30,833  16,667   47,500  40,556  6,944 
2006  80,395  62,895  17,500   127,270  117,062  10,208 
2007  41,666  41,666  - 
  630,395  590,395  40,000   718,936  701,784  17,152 

Deferred compensation equivalent to the market value of restricted common shares at date of issuance is reflected in stockholders’ equity and is being amortized to operating expense over three years. Deferred compensation expense included in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations amounted to $33,000$5,000 and $23,000$9,000 for the three month periods ended September 30,March 31, 2007 and 2006, and 2005, respectively, and $51,000 and $58,000 for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Company has not recognized any tax benefit related to this deferred compensation expense due to the existence of its federal tax net operating loss carryforward. During the three month period ended September 30, 2006,March 31, 2007, the Company issued 22,17841,666 shares of restricted common stock to non-employee directors in lieu of paying cash for quarterly directors’ fees. The fair value of these shares was $13,750$18,750 based on the share price of the shares on the date of grant. This amount is also equal to the cash amount that would have been paid for the director’s fees, and is included in selling, general and administrative expense for the three months ended September 30, 2006.March 31, 2007. The Company has deferred compensation expense of approximately $30,000$20,000 at September 30, 2006March 31, 2007 which will be recognized over the weighted average remaining life of the unvested restricted shares of approximately 2014 months.

The Company’s Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”), approved in May 1999 and last amended in October 2000, provides for the issuance to qualified participants options to purchase up to 2,500,000 of common stock. As of September 30, 2006March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2005 respectively,2006 options to purchase 490,000 and 915,000460,000 shares of common stock were outstanding under the Plan.

The exercise price of the options is determined by the administrators of the Plan, but cannot be less than the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant. Options vest ratably over periods of one to six years from the date of the grant. The options have a maximum life of ten years. The exercise price and the market price of the options were the same on the date of grant and thus there is no intrinsic value related to the outstanding options.

-16--15-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements


Following is a summary of the activity of the Plan:
    
Weighted
 
  
Number of
 
Average Exercise
 
  
Options
 
Price
 
      
      
Outstanding, December 31, 2005  915,000 $0.26 
Granted in 2006  -  - 
Exercised in 2006  (200,000) 0.24 
Canceled in 2006  (225,000) - 
Outstanding, September 30, 2006  490,000  0.29 
    
Weighted
 
  
Number of
 
Average Exercise
 
  
Options
 
Price
 
      
Outstanding, December 31, 2006  460,000 $0.24 
Granted in 2007  -  - 
Exercised in 2007  -  - 
Canceled in 2007  -  - 
Outstanding, March 31, 2007  460,000  0.24 

In September 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company elected to vest 43,334 of previously unvested share of the former Chief Financial Officer, Gary W. Boyd, in consideration for consulting services to be provided over the next year to advise on financial and accounting matters.

Additional information regarding options outstanding as of September 30, 2006March 31, 2007 is as follows:

 
Options Outstanding
 
Options Exercisable
   
   
Weighted
       
   
Avg.
       
   
Remaining
   
Weighted
   
 
Options Outstanding
 
Options Exercisable
    
Contractual
   
Avg. Exercise
 
Intrinsic
 
Exercise Price
 
# Outstanding
 
Weighted Avg. Remaining Contractual Life (Yrs.)
 
# Exercisable
 
Weighted Avg. Exercise Price
  
# Outstanding
 
Life (Yrs)
 
# Exercisable
 
Price
 
Value
 
$1.00  30,000  2.45  30,000 $1.00 
           
$0.24  460,000  5.46  460,000 $0.24   460,000  4.95  460,000 $0.24 $41,400 
  490,000    490,000 $0.29 

Had compensation cost been recognized consistent with SFAS No. 123R, the Company’s net loss attributable to common stockholders and net loss per share would have been adjusted to the pro forma amounts indicated below for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2005:
  
Three Months Ended
 
Nine Months Ended
 
  
September 30, 2005
 
September 30, 2005
 
  
(Restated)
 
(Restated)
 
Net loss attributable to common stockholders as reported $(682,000)$(1,120,000)
        
Total stock-based employee compensation included in reported net income, net of related tax effects  23,000  58,000 
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of related tax effects  (3,000) (9,000)
        
Pro forma net loss $(662,000)$(1,071,000)
        
Net loss per share:       
Basic - as reported $(0.03)$(0.05)
Basic - pro forma $(0.03)$(0.05)
Diluted - as reported $(0.03)$(0.05)
Diluted - pro forma $(0.03)$(0.05)


-17-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



The Company used the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair value of grants made during 2002. The following weighted average assumptions were applied in determining the pro forma compensation cost: risk free interest rate - 4.69%, expected option life in years - 6.00, expected stock price volatility - 1.837 and expected dividend yield - 0.00%.

-16-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

10. Business Segment Information
 
The Company is organized in three segments: (i) healthcare, (ii) real estate advisory services and (iii) corporate and other businesses. The healthcare segment consists of the operations of DHI and the real estate advisory services segment consists of the operations of the CRESA Partners of Orange County LP and CRESA Capital Markets Group LP. Key measures used by the Company’s management to evaluate business segment performance include revenue, cost of sales, gross profit and investment income and EBITDA. EBITDA is calculated as net income before deducting interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Although EBITDA is not a measure of actual cash flow because it does not consider changes in assets and liabilities that may impact cash balances, the Company believes it is a useful metric to evaluate operating performance.income.

Condensed statements of operations and balance sheet data for the Company’s principal business segments for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,March 31, 2007 and 2006 and 2005 are as follows (000’s omitted):
  
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
  
Healthcare
 
Real Estate Services
 
  
2007
 
2006
 
2007
 
2006
 
          
Revenue $10,772 $9,961 $3,885 $3,664 
Cost of sales  7,127  6,931  2,514  2,124 
Gross profit  3,645  3,030  1,371  1,540 
Other income  1  1  -  - 
Equity in income (losses) of equity method investees  -  -  -  - 
Net income (loss) $442 $(184)$518 $423 
              
Total Assets $7,580 $7,791 $10,986 $10,673 


  
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
  
Corporate & Other
 
Consolidated
 
  
2007
 
2006
 
2007
 
2006
 
          
Revenue $- $- $14,657 $13,625 
Cost of sales  -  -  9,641  9,055 
Gross profit  -  -  5,016  4,570 
Other income  -  5  1  6 
Equity in income (losses) of equity method investees  (66) (95) (66) (95)
Net income (loss) $(442)$(381)$518 $(142)
              
Total Assets $927 $1,415 $19,493 $19,879 
  
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
                  
  
Healthcare
 
Real Estate Services
 
Corporate and Other
 
Consolidated
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
                  
Revenue $10,012 $9,559 $1,971 $2,464 $- $- $11,983 $12,023 
Cost of sales  6,929  6,468  1,130  1,423  -  -  8,059  7,891 
Gross profit  3,083  3,091  841  1,041  -  -  3,924  4,132 
Other income  121  -  -  -  19  20  140  20 
Equity in losses of equity method investees  -  -  -  -  (84) (75) (84) (75)
Discontinued operations  -  (230) -  -  -  -  -  (230)
Net income (loss) $151 $(531)$47 $195 $(385)$(346)$(187)$(682)
Plus:                         
Interest Expense (Income)  83  82  100  116  16  -  199  198 
Taxes  -  -  13  30  -  17  13  47 
Depreciation &                         
Amortization  99  86  78  82  6  6  183  174 
Discontinued operations  -  230  -  -  -  -  -  230 
EBITDA from continuing operations
 
$
333
 
$
(133
)
$
238
 
$
423
 
$
(363
)
$
(323
)
$
208
 
$
(33
)



-18-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



  
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
                  
  
Healthcare
 
Real Estate Services
 
Corporate and Other
 
Consolidated
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
                  
                  
Revenue $29,972 $29,276 $8,504 $8,593 $- $- $38,476 $37,869 
Cost of sales  21,061  19,795  5,071  5,254  -  -  26,132  25,049 
Gross profit  8,911  9,481  3,433  3,339  -  -  12,344  12,820 
Other income  212  4  100  (1) 32  55  344  58 
Equity in losses of equity method investees  -  -  -  -  (300) (211) (300) (211)
Discontinued operations  230  (230) -  -  -  -  230  (230)
Net income (loss) $(90)$(737)$758 $656 $(1,178)$(1,039)$(510)$(1,120)
Plus:                         
Interest Expense (Income)  252  250  313  326  14  (12) 579  564 
Taxes  -  -  86  108  12  17  98  125 
Depreciation &                         
Amortization  293  258  223  227  18  11  534  496 
Discontinued operations  (230) 230  -  -  -  -  (230) 230 
EBITDA from continuing operations
 
$
225
 
$
1
 
$
1,380
 
$
1,317
 
$
(1,134
)
$
(1,023
)
$
471
 
$
295
 


  
September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005
 
  
Healthcare
 
Real Estate Services
 
Corporate and Other
 
Consolidated
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
2006
 
2005
 
                  
Total assets $8,543 $8,631 $10,279 $11,341 $1,053 $2,026 $19,875 $21,998 


-19--17-



ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
 
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this report together with the consolidated financial statements, notes and management’s discussion contained in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.2006.
 
Except for the historical information contained herein, the discussion in this report contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. When used in this report, the words “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” and “anticipates” and similar terms are intended to identify forward-looking statements that relate to the Company’s future performance. Our forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations of management, and we assume no obligation to update this information; additionally, the Company’s actual results may differ materially from the results discussed here. The cautionary statements made in this report should be read as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements, wherever they appear in this report. Furthermore, see the Company’s most recent Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005,2006, including the section titled “Risks Related to Our Business,” “Risks Specific to Operating Subsidiaries,” “Risks Related to Our Investments in Real Estate,” and “Other Risks.” These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, (a) the following general risks: our limited funds and risks of not obtaining additional funds, certain of our subsidiaries are highly leveraged, potential difficulties in integrating and managing our subsidiaries, our dependence upon management, our dependence upon a small staff, certain subsidiaries accounting for a significant percentage of revenue, unforeseen acquisition costs, the potential for future leveraged acquisitions, restrictions on the use of net operating loss carryforwards, and the difficulty in predicting operations; (b) the following risks to Dougherty’s Holdings, Inc.: extensive regulation of the pharmacy business, the competitive nature of the retail pharmacy industry, third party payor attempts to reduce reimbursement rates, difficulty in collecting accounts receivable, dependence upon a single pharmaceutical products supplier, price increases as a result of our potential failure to maintain sufficient pharmaceutical sales, shortages in qualified employees, and liability risks inherent in the pharmaceutical industry; (c) the following risks to CRESA Partners of Orange County, L.P.: the size of our competitors, our concentration on the southern California real estate market, the variance of financial results among quarters, the inability to retain senior management and/or attract and retain qualified employees, the regulatory and compliance requirements of the real estate brokerage industry and the risks of failing to comply with such requirements, and the potential liabilities that arise from our real estate brokerage activities; (d) the following risks to our investments in real estate including Fairways Frisco, L.P.: our dependence on tenants for lease revenues, the risks inherent in real estate development activities, the general economic conditions of areas in which we focus our real estate development activities, the risks of natural disasters, the illiquidity of real estate investments; and (e) the following other risks: a majority of our common stock is beneficially owned by our principal stockholders, officers and directors, relationships and transactions with related parties, our stock is not traded on NASDAQ or a national securities exchange, effect of penny stock regulations, and litigation.
 
In addition to the aforementioned risk factors, our future operating results are difficult to predict. Factors that are likely to cause varying results include our ability to profitably operate DHI and CPOC and to pay the principal and interest on the significant debt incurred to make these acquisition; our ability to pay the principal and interest on approximately $4.4 million of promissory notes of which approximately $4 million is due in March 2007 and another $450,000 is due on demand and, if we are unable to pay these obligations when due, our ability to refinance such amounts at all or, if we are able to refinance such amounts, our ability to refinance such amounts on terms acceptable to us; our success with the investments in, and operations of Ampco, Capital Markets and our participation in Fairways transactions; our ability to operate Park InfusionCare; the results of our investments in real estate; fluctuations in general interest rates; the availability and cost of capital to us; the existence and amount of unforeseen acquisition costs; and our ability to locate and successfully acquire or develop one or more business enterprises.


-18-

The Company

Ascendant Solutions, Inc. (“we,We,“us,“Us,” or “the Company”the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation with principal executive offices located at 16250 Dallas Parkway, Suite 100, Dallas, Texas 75248 (telephone number 972-250-0945). We are a diversified financial services company which is seeking to, or has invested in, or acquired, healthcare, manufacturing, distribution or service companies. We are organized in three segments: (i) healthcare, (ii) real estate advisory services and (iii) corporate and other businesses. A detailed discussion of our business segments is included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005.

-20-



Healthcare

Our healthcare segment consists of Dougherty’s Holdings, Inc. (“DHI”), which operates specialty retail pharmacies. Based in Dallas, Texas, DHI operates (i) Dougherty’s Pharmacy Inc. in Dallas, a specialty compounding pharmacy, and (ii) three specialty pharmacies in the area between Houston and the Gulf of Mexico coast under the name “Medicine Man”, and (iii) three infusion therapy facilities in Dallas, San Antonio and Houston, Texas under the name “Park InfusionCare.”.

Real Estate Advisory Services

Our real estate advisory services segment consists of (i) CRESA Capital Markets Group, L.P. (“Capital Markets”) a subsidiary in which the Company owns 80% of the issued and outstanding limited partnership interests (ii) our wholly owned subsidiary ASDS of Orange County, Inc., a Delaware corporation f/k/a Orange County Acquisition Corp. (“ASDS”) and (iii) CRESA Partners of Orange County, LP. (“CPOC”), a subsidiary in which the Company owns 99% of the issued and outstanding limited partnership interests.

Corporate & Other Businesses

Our corporate & other businesses segment includes investments in and results from investments in unconsolidated subsidiaries. The investments and investment results included in this segment are from the following entities: Ampco Partners, Ltd., Fairways Frisco, LP and Fairways 03 New Jersey, LP.

Discontinued Operations

As disclosed in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed on May 24, 2006, the board of directors decided to retain the operations of Park InfusionCare, which had previously been reported as a discontinued operation while the Company was pursuing a potential disposition or strategic transaction for its infusion therapy business. In connection with the decision to retain the operations of Park InfusionCare, DHI entered into an employment agreement on May 18, 2006 with Scott R. Holtmyer to be the Vice President of its Park InfusionCare infusion therapy business.

The Company began reporting the results of Park InfusionCare as a discontinued operation in its September 30, 2005 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. As a result of the board of directors decision to retain the operations of Park InfusionCare, the Company has reported the operating results of Park InfusionCare as part of continuing operations in its June 30, 2006 and September 30, 2006 quarterly reports on Form 10-Q.

The Company had previously recorded an estimated charge of $230,000 for employee retention costs directly related to any potential disposition or strategic transaction for Park InfusionCare. As no such transaction was consummated, none of these retention costs were paid and the Company has recorded a reversal of this accrual as part of results from discontinued operations in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2006 and 2005. All otherall Park InfusionCare amounts in this Form 10-Q for the three and nine month periods ended September 30,March 31, 2007 and 2006 and 2005 have been reported as part of continuing operations.

We are also occasionally involved in other claims and proceedings, which are incidental to our business. We cannot determine what, if any, material effect these matters will have on our future financial position and results of operations.



-21--19-



Results of Operations: Comparison of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2006March 31, 2007 to the Three Months Ended September 30, 2005March 31, 2006 (000’s Omitted)
The Company is organized in three segments: (i) healthcare, (ii) real estate advisory services and (iii) corporate and other businesses. The healthcare segment consists of the operations of DHI and the real estate advisory services segment consists of the operations of the CRESA Partners of Orange County LP and CRESA Capital Markets Group LP. Key measures used by the Company’s management to evaluate business segment performance include revenue, cost of sales, gross profit and investment income.  EBITDA is calculated as net income before deducting interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. Although EBITDA is not a measure of actual cash flow because it does not consider changes in assets and liabilities that may impact cash balances, the Company believes it is a useful metric to evaluate operating performance.
  
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
  
Healthcare
 
Real Estate Advisory Services
 
  
2007
 
2006
 
$ Change
 
2007
 
2006
 
$ Change
 
Revenue $10,772 $9,961 $811 $3,885 $3,664 $221 
Cost of Sales  7,127  6,931  196  2,514  2,124  390 
Gross Profit  3,645  3,030  615  1,371  1,540  (169)
Operating expenses  3,117  3,133  (16) 724  948  (224)
Equity in income (losses) of equity method investees  -  -  -  -  -  - 
Other income  1  1  -  -  -  - 
Interest income (expense), net  (87) (82) (5) (64) (106) 42 
Minority interests  -  -  -  (8) (18) 10 
Income tax provision  -  -  -  (57) (45) (12)
Net income (loss)
 
$
442
 
$
(184
)
$
626
 
$
518
 
$
423
 
$
95
 
Plus:
                   
Interest (income) expense, net $87 $82 $5 $64 $106 $(42)
Income tax provision  -  -  -  57  45  12 
Depreciation and amortization  99  77  22  61  75  (14)
EBITDA
 
$
628
 
$
(25
)
$
653
 
$
700
 
$
649
 
$
51
 

  
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
  
Corporate & Other
 
Consolidated
 
  
2007
 
2006
 
$ Change
 
2007
 
2006
 
$ Change
 
              
Revenue $- $- $- $14,657 $13,625 $1,032 
Cost of Sales  -  -  -  9,641  9,055  586 
Gross Profit  -  -  -  5,016  4,570  446 
Operating expenses  356  277  79  4,197  4,358  (161)
Equity in income (losses) of equity method investees  (66) (95) 29  (66) (95) 29 
Other income  -  5  (5) 1  6  (5)
Interest income (expense), net  (15) 4  (19) (166) (184) 18 
Minority interests  -  (9) 9  (8) (27) 19 
Income tax provision  (5) (9) 4  (62) (54) (8)
Net income (loss)
 
$
(442
)
$
(381
)
$
(61
)
$
518
 
$
(142
)
$
660
 
Plus:
                   
Interest (income) expense, net $15 $(4)$19 $166 $184 $(18)
Income tax provision  5  9  (4) 62  54  8 
Depreciation and amortization  6  6  -  166  158  8 
EBITDA
 
$
(416
)
$
(370
)
$
(46
)
$
912
 
$
254
 
$
658
 
  
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
  
Healthcare
 
Real Estate Advisory Services
 
      
Dollar
     
Dollar
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
Change
 
2006
 
2005
 
Change
 
              
Revenue $10,012 $9,559 $453 $1,971 $2,464 $(493)
Cost of Sales  6,929  6,468  461  1,130  1,423  (293)
Gross Profit  3,083  3,091  (8) 841  1,041  (200)
Operating expenses  2,970  3,310  (340) 681  701  (20)
Equity in income (losses) of equity method investees  -  -  -  -  -  - 
Other income  121  -  121  -  -  - 
Interest income (expense), net  (83) (82) (1) (100) (116) 16 
Minority interests  -  -  -  -  1  (1)
Income tax provision  -  -  -  (13) (30) 17 
Discontinued operations  -  (230) 230  -  -  - 
Net income
 
$
151
 
$
(531
)
$
682
 
$
47
 
$
195
 
$
(148
)
Plus:
                   
Interest (income) expense, net $83 $82 $1 $100 $116 $(16)
Income tax provision  -  -  -  13  30  (17)
Depreciation & Amortization  99  86  13  78  82  (4)
Discontinued operations  -  230  (230) -  -  - 
EBITDA from continuing operations
 
$
333
 
$
(133
)
$
466
 
$
238
 
$
423
 
$
(185
)

  
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
  
Corporate & Other
 
Consolidated
 
      
Dollar
     
Dollar
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
Change
 
2006
 
2005
 
Change
 
              
Revenue $- $- $- $11,983 $12,023 $(40)
Cost of Sales  -  -  -  8,059  7,891  168 
Gross Profit  -  -  -  3,924  4,132  (208)
Operating expenses  304  273  31  3,955  4,284  (329)
Equity in income (losses) of equity method investees  (84) (75) (9) (84) (75) (9)
Other income  19  20  (1) 140  20  120 
Interest income (expense), net  (16) -  (16) (199) (198) (1)
Minority interests  -  (1) 1  -  -  - 
Income tax provision  -  (17) 17  (13) (47) 34 
Discontinued operations  -  -  -  -  (230) 230 
Net income
 
$
(385
)
$
(346
)
$
(39
)
$
(187
)
$
(682
)
$
265
 
Plus:
                   
Interest (income) expense, net $16 $- $16 $199 $198 $1 
Income tax provision  -  17  (17) 13  47  (34)
Depreciation & Amortization  6  6  -  183  174  9 
Discontinued operations  -  -  -  -  230  (230)
EBITDA from continuing operations
 
$
(363
)
$
(323
)
$
(40
)
$
208
 
$
(33
)
$
241
 

-22--20-




Consolidated Overview

Revenues
Total revenues of the Company increased $1,032,000 during the first quarter of 2007 to $14,657,000. This represents a 7.6% increase over revenue of $13,625,000 in the first quarter of 2006. The increase is primarily attributable to increased volume of retail pharmacy prescriptions at the retail pharmacies in the healthcare segment of our business and an increase in the commissions received for tenant representation services in the real estate advisory services segment of our business.

Cost of sales
The cost of sales of the Company increased $586,000 during the first quarter of 2007 to $9,641,000 or 65.8% of revenues. Cost of sales in the first quarter of 2006 was $9,055,000 or 66.5% of revenues. The overall increase in cost of sales is primarily due to increased volume of retail pharmacy prescriptions filled in the healthcare segment of our business and an increase in the amount of broker commissions paid for tenant representation services in the real estate advisory services segment of our business.

Healthcare

Revenues
Total revenues increased $453,000$811,000 during the thirdfirst quarter of 20062007 to $10,012,000.$10,772,000. This represents a 4.7%an 8.1% increase over revenue of $9,559,000$9,961,000 in the thirdfirst quarter of 2005.2006. The increase includes a 4.6%3% increase in the number of retail pharmacy prescriptions filled. The increase in revenue of $1,149,000,$818,000, or 15.7%10.2% at the retail pharmacies, is slightly offset by a decrease of $696,000,$7,000, or 30.8%0.3%, at Park InfusionCare. The decrease in infusion revenue is due to a decrease in the number of patient therapies and the lingering impact on ongoing business from the Company’s prior announcement in November 2005 of the plans to seek a strategic transaction or potential disposition.

Cost of sales
The cost of sales increased $461,000$196,000 during the thirdfirst quarter of 20062007 to $6,929,000$7,127,000 or 69.2%66.2% of revenues. Cost of sales in the thirdfirst quarter of 20052006 was $6,468,000$6,931,000 or 67.7%69.6% of revenues. The overall increase in cost of sales is primarily due to increased volume of retail pharmacy prescriptions filled and sales of other merchandise of $993,000, or 18.8%, which is offset by a decreased volume of infusion therapy of $532,000, or 44.9%.merchandise. In addition, the increase in the cost of sales is due toincludes a 1.9% increase2.2% decrease in the cost of sales at the retail pharmacies which isdue to improved purchasing, an increased mix of generic prescriptions as compared to brand name drugs offset by a 10.7%10.9% decrease in the cost of infusion therapy drugs.drugs due to a change in the mix of revenue to higher margin therapies.

Gross profit
Gross profit decreased $8,000increased $615,000 as a result of the factors discussed in Revenues and Cost of salesSales above. Gross profit was 30.8%33.8% of revenue in the thirdfirst quarter of 20062007 as compared to 32.3%30.4% of revenue in the thirdfirst quarter of 2005. The increase in gross2006. Gross profit of $155,000,increased by $404,000, or 7.7%19.4% at the retail pharmacies is offset by a decrease of $163,000,and $211,000, or 15.2%22.2% at Park InfusionCare. As a result, the gross profit and overall results of Healthcare continued to be adversely impacted by Park InfusionCare.

Operating expenses
Operating expenses decreased $340,000$16,000 from $3,310,000$3,133,000 in the thirdfirst quarter of 20052006 to $2,970,000$3,117,000 in the thirdfirst quarter of 2006.2007. The decrease in healthcare operating expenses is due primarily to a reduced headcountcontinuation of cost reduction initiatives.

Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and other operating expensesAmortization
EBITDA increased by $653,000 to EBITDA of $628,000 in the first quarter of 2007 from an EBITDA loss of ($25,000) in the first quarter of 2006. This overall increase is due primarily to an increase in revenue at the retail pharmacies and lower costs. EBITDA at the Retail Pharmacies increased 91.6% in the first quarter of 2007 to $738,000 from $385,000 in the first quarter of 2006. During the first quarter of 2007, Park InfusionCare had EBITDA of $218,000 which is a reduction of 16.4% as compared to$32,000 in the thirdfirst quarter of 2005. In addition, overhead expenses at2007 from an EBITDA loss of ($162,000) in the corporate office were reduced by $111,000 which is a reduction of 36% as a result of reduced headcount and other cost reduction initiatives as compared to the thirdfirst quarter of 2005.2006, an increase of $194,000.

Real Estate Advisory Services

Revenue
Revenue decreased $493,000increased $221,000 from $2,464,000$3,664,000 in the thirdfirst quarter of 20052006 to $1,971,000$3,885,000 during the thirdfirst quarter of 2006.2007. The decreaseincrease is due primarily to a decreasean increase of $463,000$553,000 in revenue earned by CPOC.CPOC which is offset by a decrease of $332,000 in revenue earned by Capital Markets. The revenue decreaseincrease at CPOC is due to a decreasean increase in commissions received for tenant representation services in the thirdfirst quarter of 2007. The decrease in revenue at Capital Markets is due to fewer fees received from the closing of advisory transactions as compared to transactions fees earned in the first quarter of 2006.

-21-



Cost of Sales
Cost of sales was $1,130,000$2,514,000 for the thirdfirst quarter of 2006,2007, representing 57.3%64.7% of revenue. By comparison, cost of sales was $1,423,000$2,124,000 or 57.8%58% of revenue in the thirdfirst quarter of 2005.2006. The decreaseincrease in the cost of sales percentage is due to a decreasean increase in broker commissions paid as a percentage of total revenue. Brokerage commissions can vary depending on the transaction terms and whether brokers have reached certain commission targets. Cost of sales includes all direct costs, including license fees and broker commissions, incurred in connection with a real estate advisory transaction.

Operating Expenses
Operating Expensesexpenses decreased $20,000$224,000 from $701,000$948,000 in the thirdfirst quarter of 20052006 to $681,000$724,000 for the thirdfirst quarter of 2006.2007. The decrease in operating expenses is due mostlyprimarily to a $40,000$216,000 decrease in expenses for Capital Markets as a result of its management agreement with Fairways Equities, under which it only incurs expenses when revenues are earned from a real estate advisory transaction closing. This agreement was implemented in the third quarter of 2005.

Income tax provision
The income tax provision decreased $17,000 in the third quarter of 2006. The decrease is due to a decrease in net income before taxes at CPOC. The income tax provision represents the California state income tax expense for CPOC. The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards for Federal and state income tax purposes does not contain any loss carryforwards available to offset California state income taxes.

-23-


Corporate & Other

Operating expenses
Operating expenses increased $31,000 from $273,000 in the third quarter of 2005 to $304,000 in the third quarter of 2006 and is primarily comprised of increased expenses for payroll and professional fees in the normal course of business.

Equity in losses of equity method investees
Equity in losses of equity method investees increased $9,000 from ($75,000) during the third quarter of 2005 to ($84,000) for the third quarter of 2006. Equity in losses of equity method investees represents our pro-rata portion, based on our limited partnership interests, of the losses of Ampco Partners, Ltd., Fairways 03 New Jersey, L.P. and Fairways Frisco, LP as follows:

  
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
      
Ampco Partners, Ltd. $5,000 $35,000 
Fairways 03 New Jersey, LP  -  42,000 
Fairways Frisco, L.P.  (89,000) (152,000)
  $(84,000)$(75,000)

The equity in losses of Fairways Frisco represents our share of the net loss of Fairways Frisco for the three months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. We made our initial investment in Fairways Frisco on December 31, 2004, and accordingly no equity in losses of Fairways Frisco was recorded in 2004. These amounts are a non-cash adjustment to our operating results and we have no obligation to fund the operating losses or debts of Fairways Frisco.

-24-

Results of Operations: Comparison of the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2006 to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2005 (000’s Omitted)
  
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
  
Healthcare
 
Real Estate Advisory Services
 
      
Dollar
     
Dollar
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
Change
 
2006
 
2005
 
Change
 
              
Revenue $29,972 $29,276 $696 $8,504 $8,593 $(89)
Cost of Sales  21,061  19,795  1,266  5,071  5,254  (183)
Gross Profit  8,911  9,481  (570) 3,433  3,339  94 
Operating expenses  9,191  9,742  (551) 2,353  2,278  75 
Equity in income (losses) of equity method investees  -  -  -  -  -  - 
Other income  212  4  208  100  (1) 101 
Interest income (expense), net  (252) (250) (2) (313) (326) 13 
Minority interests  -  -  -  (23) 30  (53)
Income tax provision  -  -  -  (86) (108) 22 
Discontinued operations  230  (230) 460  -  -  - 
Net income
 
$
(90
)
$
(737
)
$
647
 
$
758
 
$
656
 
$
102
 
Plus:
                   
Interest (income) expense, net $252 $250 $2 $313 $326 $(13)
Income tax provision  -  -  -  86  108  (22)
Depreciation & Amortization  293  258  35  223  227  (4)
Discontinued operations  (230) 230  (460) -  -  - 
EBITDA from continuing operations
 
$
225
 
$
1
 
$
224
 
$
1,380
 
$
1,317
 
$
63
 
  
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
  
Corporate & Other
 
Consolidated
 
      
Dollar
     
Dollar
 
  
2006
 
2005
 
Change
 
2006
 
2005
 
Change
 
              
Revenue $- $- $- $38,476 $37,869 $607 
Cost of Sales  -  -  -  26,132  25,049  1,083 
Gross Profit  -  -  -  12,344  12,820  (476)
Operating expenses  876  877  (1) 12,420  12,897  (477)
Equity in income (losses) of equity method investees  (300) (211) (89) (300) (211) (89)
Other income  32  55  (23) 344  58  286 
Interest income (expense), net  (14) 12  (26) (579) (564) (15)
Minority interests  (8) (1) (7) (31) 29  (60)
Income tax provision  (12) (17) 5  (98) (125) 27 
Discontinued operations  -  -  -  230  (230) 460 
Net income
 
$
(1,178
)
$
(1,039
)
$
(139
)
$
(510
)
$
(1,120
)
$
610
 
Plus:
                   
Interest (income) expense, net $14 $(12)$26 $579 $564 $15 
Income tax provision  12  17  (5) 98  125  (27)
Depreciation & Amortization  18  11  7  534  496  38 
Discontinued operations  -  -  -  (230) 230  (460)
EBITDA from continuing operations
 
$
(1,134
)
$
(1,023
)
$
(111
)
$
471
 
$
295
 
$
176
 

-25-


Healthcare

Revenues
Total revenues increased $696,000 during the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 to $29,972,000. This represents a 2.4% increase over revenue of $29,276,000 in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005. The increase is due to a 3.9% increase in the number of retail pharmacy prescriptions filled, an increase in prices for retail pharmacy prescriptions and additional volume in non-prescription merchandise. The increase in revenue of $2,723,000, or 12.3% at the retail pharmacies, is offset by a decrease of $2,027,000, or 28.5%, at Park InfusionCare. The decrease in infusion revenue is due to a decrease in the number of patient therapies and the lingering impact on the ongoing business from the Company’s prior announcement in November 2005 of the plans to seek a strategic transaction or potential disposition.

Cost of sales
The cost of sales increased $1,266,000 during the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 to $21,061,000 or 70.3% of revenues. Cost of sales in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 was $19,795,000 or 67.6% of revenues. The overall increase in cost of sales is primarily due to increased volume of retail pharmacy prescriptions filled and sales of other merchandise of $2,308,000, or 14.2%, which is offset by a decreased volume of infusion therapy of $1,042,000, or 29.3%. In addition, the increase in cost of sales is due to a 1.3% increase in the cost at the retail pharmacies which is slightly offset by a 0.6% decrease in the cost of infusion therapy drugs.

Gross profit
Gross profit decreased $570,000 as a result of the factors discussed in Revenues and Cost of sales above. Gross profit was 29.7% of revenue in the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to 32.4% of revenue in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005. The increase in gross profit of $415,000, or 7% at the retail pharmacies, is offset by a decrease of $985,000, or 27.7% at Park InfusionCare. As a result, the gross profit and overall results of Healthcare continued to be adversely impacted by Park InfusionCare.

Operating expenses
Operating expenses decreased $551,000 from $9,742,000 in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 to $9,191,000 in the nine month period ended September 30, 2006. The decrease in healthcare operating expenses is due to a reduction in headcount and other operating expenses at Park InfusionCare of $396,000 which is a reduction of 10.7% as compared to the nine month period ended September 30, 2006. These reductions are offset by an increase in operating expenses at the retail pharmacies of $333,000, or 11.7% due to an increase in headcount and other operating expenses due to the increase in volume and revenue. In addition, overhead expenses at the corporate office were reduced by $488,000 which is a reduction of 38.4% as a result of reduced headcount expenses and professional fees, primarily related to the potential transaction of Park InfusionCare, as well as other cost reduction initiatives as compared to the same period in 2005.

Real Estate Advisory Services

Revenue
Revenue decreased $89,000 from $8,593,000 in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 to $8,504,000 during the nine month period ended September 30, 2006. The decrease is due to a decrease of $398,000 in revenue earned by CPOC which is offset by an increase of $309,000 in revenue at Capital Markets. The revenue decrease at CPOC is due to a decrease in commissions received for tenant representation services in the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to the commission received for the same period ended September 30, 2005. The revenue increase at Capital Markets is due to fees received from the closing of an advisory transaction in the nine month period ended September 30, 2006 as compared to transaction fees earned in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005.

Cost of Sales
Cost of sales was $5,071,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006, representing 59.6% of revenue. By comparison, cost of sales was $5,254,000 or 61.1% of revenue in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005. The decrease in the cost of sales percentage is due to a decrease in broker commissions paid as a percentage of total revenue. Brokerage commissions can vary depending on the transaction terms and whether brokers have reached certain commission targets. Cost of sales includes all direct costs, including license fees and broker commissions, incurred in connection with a real estate advisory transaction.

-26-



Operating Expenses
Operating Expenses increased $75,000 from $2,278,000 in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005 to $2,353,000 for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006. The increase includes professional bonus and management fee expenses which are paid based on a percentage of revenue earned by Capital Markets. Operating expenses at CPOC also increased due to higher personnel and facilities expenses.

Income tax provision
The income tax provision declined $22,000increased $12,000 in the nine month period ended September 30, 2006.first quarter of 2007. The declineincrease is due to a declinean increase in net income before taxes at CPOC. The income tax provision represents the California state income tax expense for CPOC. The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards for Federal and state income tax purposes does not contain any loss carryforwards available to offset California state income taxes.

Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization
EBITDA increased 7.9% to $700,000 in the first quarter of 2007 from $649,000 in the first quarter of 2006. This overall increase includes an increase in revenue of $221,000 and a corresponding increase in gross profit of $169,000.

Corporate & Other

Operating expenses
Operating expenses decreased $1,000increased $79,000 from $877,000$277,000 in the nine month period ended September 30, 2005first quarter of 2006 to $876,000$356,000 in the nine month period ended September 30, 2006.first quarter of 2007 and is primarily comprised of increased expenses for professional fees in the normal course of business.

Equity in income (losses)losses of equity method investees
Equity in income (losses) of equity method investees increased ($89,000)decreased $29,000 from ($211,000)95,000) during the nine month period ended September 30, 2005first quarter of 2006 to ($300,000)66,000) for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006.first quarter of 2007. Equity in income (losses)losses of equity method investees represents our pro-rata portion, based on our limited partnership interests, of the income (losses)losses of Ampco Partners, Ltd., Fairways 03 New Jersey, L.P. and Fairways Frisco, LP as follows:

 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
  
2007
 
2006
 
 
2006
 
2005
  
(Unaudited)
 
(Unaudited)
 
          
Ampco Partners, Ltd. $73,000 $95,000  $31,000 $35,000 
Fairways 03 New Jersey, LP  -  136,000 
Fairways Frisco, L.P.  (373,000) (442,000)  (97,000) (130,000)
 $(300,000)$(211,000) $(66,000)$(95,000)

The equity in losses of Fairways Frisco represents our share of the net loss of Fairways Frisco for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2007 and 2006, and 2005, respectively. We made our initial investment in Fairways Frisco on December 31, 2004, and accordingly no equity in income (losses) of Fairways Frisco was recorded in 2004. These amounts are a non-cash adjustment to our operating results and we have no obligation to fund the operating losses or debts of Fairways Frisco.

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
As of September 30, 2006,March 31, 2007, we had working capital of approximately $3.6 million as compared to a working capital deficit of approximately $(1.6) million as compared to working capital of approximately $4.5$0.1 million at December 31, 2005.2006. This decreaseincrease is due primarily to $4.4$3.7 million of notes payable included as a current liability at September 30,December 31, 2006, which were classified as long term at DecemberMarch 31, 2005.2007. These notes payable related to the Healthcare segment are contractually duewhich was refinanced with a new credit facility with Amegy Bank in MarchFebruary 2007. The Company has had ongoing discussions with various banks regarding the refinancing

-22-



As of September 30, 2006,March 31, 2007, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $2.3$2.1 million as compared to approximately $3.2$2.7 million at December 31, 2005.2006. The decrease is primarily the result of cash flow used in financing activities for the ninethree month period ended September 30, 2006March 31, 2007 of $1.1$0.7 million. The overall decrease in cash also includes payments on notes payable of $2.4$4.9 million offset by cash borrowed on notes payable of $985,000.$4.2 million.

-27-




Our future capital needs are uncertain. The Company may or may not need additional financing in the future to fund operations. We do not know whether additional financing will be available when needed, or that, if available, we will obtain financing on terms favorable to stockholders.

Cash Flow

Since December 31, 2005,2006, we have decreased our cash balances by approximately $943,000.$595,000. Cash flow from operating activities totaled $257,000.$183,000. We used cash in investing activities of $103,000 primarily$42,000 due to $161,000 of purchasepurchases of property and equipment net of distributions from limited partners of $85,000.equipment. We also used cash in financing activities of $1,097,000approximately $736,000 primarily due to approximately $2.4 million in reductions of outstandingfor payments on notes payable borrowings of $985,000 under$4.9 million offset by cash borrowed on notes payable and the receipt of the final installment of the $230,000 CPOC restructuring fee.$4.2 million

Tax Loss Carryforwards

At December 31, 2005, we2006, the Company had approximately $54$51 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards and $21available to offset future taxable income, which, if not utilized, will fully expire from 2018 to 2024.  In addition, the Company had approximately $2.9 million of state net operating loss carryforwards available to offset future taxable income, which, if not utilized, will fully expire from 20182007 to 2024.2009. We believe that the issuance of shares of our common stock pursuant to our initial public offering on November 15, 1999 caused an “ownership change” for purposes of Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Consequently, we believe that the portion of our net operating loss carryforwards attributable to the period prior to November 16, 1999 is subject to an annual limitation pursuant to Section 382. Our total deferred tax assets have been fully reserved as a result of the uncertainty of future taxable income. Accordingly, no tax benefit has been recognized in the periods presented.

State Income Taxes

In May 2006, the State of Texas replaced the current franchise tax system with a new Texas Margin Tax (“TMT”). The TMT is a 1% gross receipts tax based on the Company’s taxable margin, as defined by the new law. However, for taxable entities primarily engaged in retail and wholesale trade, the rate is 0.5% of taxable margin. The Company is currently evaluatinghas evaluated the impact of the TMT which is effective January 1, 2008.on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows and has concluded that the TMT does not appear it will have a material impact on its results of operations.

Disclosures About Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments

A summary of our contractual commitments under debt and lease agreements and other contractual obligations at September 30, 2006March 31, 2007 and the effect such obligations are expected to have on liquidity and cash flow in future periods appears below. This is all forward-looking information and is subject to the risks and qualifications set forth at the beginning of Item 2.

Contractual Obligations
   
As of March 31, 2007
 
Payments due by Period
 
  Less than 1-3 3-5 More than   
  1 year Years Years 5 years Total 
            
Lease Obligations $1,270,000 $2,258,000 $1,069,000 $1,934,000 $6,531,000 
Notes Payable  2,380,000  6,310,000  504,000  -  9,194,000 
                 
Total $3,650,000 $8,568,000 $1,573,000 $1,934,000 $15,725,000 


Contractual Obligations
 
Payments due by Period
 
As of September 30, 2006
 
($-000's omitted)
 
  Less than 1-3 3-5 More than   
  1 year Years Years 5 years Total 
            
Lease Obligations $1,312,000 $3,160,000 $327,000 $2,077,000 $6,876,000 
Notes Payable  6,074,000  4,336,000  -  -  10,410,000 
                 
Total $7,386,000 $7,496,000 $327,000 $2,077,000 $17,286,000 
-23-


Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to long-term investments.

-28-



We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We believe the following accounting policies and the related judgments and estimates affect the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Critical accounting policies not otherwise included herein are included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20052006 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Long-Term Investments  

Equity method investments represent investments in limited partnerships accounted for using the equity method of accounting for investments, and none represent investments in publicly traded companies. The equity method is used as the Company does not have a majority interest and does not have significant influence over the operations of the respective companies. The Company also uses the equity method for investments in real estate limited partnerships where it owns more than 3% to 5% of the limited partnership interests. Accordingly, the Company records its proportionate share of the income or losses generated by equity method investees in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. If the Company receives distributions in excess of its equity in earnings, they are recorded as a reduction of its investment.

The fair value of our long-term investments is dependent upon the performance of the companies in which we have invested, as well as volatility inherent in the external markets for these investments. The fair value of our ownership interests in, and advances to, privately held companies is generally determined based on overall market conditions, availability of capital as well as the value at which independent third parties have invested in similar private equity transactions. We evaluate, on an on-going basis, the carrying value of our ownership interests in and advances to the companies in which we have invested for possible impairment based on achievement of business plan objectives, the financial condition and prospects of the company and other relevant factors, including overall market conditions. Such factors may be financial or non-financial in nature.

If as a result of the review of this information, we believe our investment should be reduced to a fair value below its cost, the reduction would be charged to “loss on investments” on the statements of operations. Although we believe our estimates reasonably reflect the fair value of our investments, our key assumptions regarding future results of operations and other factors may not reflect those of an active market, in which case the carrying values may have been materially different than the amounts reported.

Recent Accounting Pronouncement.

In December 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FASB Statement No. 123R (Revised 2004), Share-Based Payment, which required that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions such as options, restricted share plans, performance based awards, share appreciation rights and employee share purchase plans be recognized in financial statements.

Statement 123R replaces FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. Statement 123, as originally issued in 1995, established as preferable a fair-value-based method of accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. However, that statement permitted entities the option of continuing to apply the guidance in Opinion 25, as long as the footnotes to the financial statements disclosed what net income (loss) would have been had the preferable fair-value-based method been used.

-24-



The Company currently expenses the cost of restricted shares issued to employees and directors over the service vesting period associated with the restricted shares. The Company currently has no options outstanding which are not vested. The implementation of Statement 123R in the first quarter of 2006 did not have a material impact on results of operations.

In June 2006, the FASB issued Interpretation No. 48 (‘(“FIN 48’48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with early adoption permitted. Effective January 1, 2007, we adopted the provisions of FIN 48 clarifieswhich provides detailed guidance for the accounting for uncertaintyfinancial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions recognized in income taxes recognizedthe financial statements in accordance with FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, by providing a recognition threshold and measurement guidance for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. The Company has not electedTax positions must meet a “more-likely-than-not” recognition threshold at the effective date to early adoptbe recognized upon the provisionsadoption of FIN 48.

48 and in subsequent periods.
-29-

We have evaluated the impact of this interpretation on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows and have concluded that it does not appear to have a material impact on our results of operations. Please see Note 2 “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” in the notes hereto for additional information.


In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This Statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the FASB having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this Statement does not require any new fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any,any; the adoption of SFAS 157 will have on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

-30-

TableIn September 2006, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 108 ("SAB 108"), "Considering the Effects of ContentsPrior Year Misstatements when Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements." SAB 108 was issued to provide consistency in how registrants quantify financial statement misstatements. The Company is required to and will initially apply SAB 108 in connection with the preparation of its annual financial statements for the year ending December 31, 2006. The Company does not expect the application of SAB 108 to have a material effect on its financial position and results of operations.
 

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We currently do not engage in commodity futures trading or hedging activities and do not enter into derivative financial instrument transactions for trading or other speculative purposes. We also do not currently engage in transactions in foreign currencies or in interest rate swap transactions that could expose us to market risk.  

We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates with respect to the credit agreements entered into by our subsidiaries to the extent that the pricing of these agreements is floating.

We are exposed to interest rate risk as a result of CPOC’s term note payable to First Republic Bank, which bears interest payable monthly at the prime rate minus 0.25% per annum. We are also exposed to interest rate risk under our term note payable to Ampco Partners, Ltd, which bears interest at the prime rate plus 4.00%. In addition, we are now exposed to interest rate risk under DHI’s new Amegy Bank revolving line of credit which bears interest at the prime rate and term note which bears interest at the prime rate plus 0.25%. If the effective interest rate under these term notes were to increase by 100 basis points (1.00%), our annual financing expense would increase by approximately $55,000,$77,000, based on the average balance outstanding under the term note during the ninethree month period ended September 30, 2006.March 31, 2007. A 100 basis points (1.00%) increase in market interest rates would decrease the fair value of our fixed rate debt by approximately $35,000.$11,000. We did not experience a material impact from interest rate risk during the three and nine month periodsperiod ended September 30, 2006, respectively.March 31, 2007.

In addition, our ability to finance future acquisitions through debt transactions may be impacted if we are unable to obtain appropriate debt financing at acceptable rates. We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates through our investing activities. Our investment portfolio consists primarily of investments in high-grade commercial bank money market accounts.

-25-


The following table summarizes the financial instruments held by us at September 30, 2006,March 31, 2007, which are sensitive to changes in interest rates. At September 30, 2006,March 31, 2007, approximately 51.4%91.3% of our debt was subject to changes in market interest rates and was sensitive to those changes. Scheduled debt principal payments for the twelve months ending September 30,March 31, are as follows:
  Fixed Rate Variable Total 
        
2008 $190,000 $2,190,000 $2,380,000 
2009  612,000  3,748,000  4,360,000 
2010  -  1,950,000  1,950,000 
2011  -  504,000  504,000 
Thereafter  -  -  - 
  $802,000 $8,392,000 $9,194,000 


  Fixed Rate Variable Total 
        
2007 $4,424,000 $1,650,000 $6,074,000 
2008  45,000  1,200,000  1,245,000 
2009  591,000  2,500,000  3,091,000 
  $5,060,000 $5,350,000 $10,410,000 
-26-



ITEM 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As required by rule 13a-15(b), the Company, including the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effectiveineffective as of the end of the period covered by this report. As required by Rule 13a-15(d), the Company’s management conducted an evaluation of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting to determine whether any changes occurred during the secondfirst fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

As previously disclosed in our Annual Report of Form 10-K, our Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2006, our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective, due to the identification of a material weakness in the revenue recognition process at its Park InfusionCare subsidiary as described below.

A material weakness is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that results in a more than remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the consolidated annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. In connection with the preparation of the Company’s 2006 consolidated financial statements, the Company identified the following control deficiencies, which represented a material weakness in the Company’s financial statement close and reporting process as of December 31, 2006.

The Company concluded that its revenue recognition process for 2006 at its Park InfusionCare subsidiary was ineffective as a result of an identified material weakness. During 2006, variances from expected payments received from insurance companies were not investigated in a timely manner, and thus were incorrectly accounted for as liabilities rather than revenue. In March 2007, the Company identified an accounting error at its Park InfusionCare subsidiary where certain payments received from insurance companies during the year ended December 31, 2006 were incorrectly recorded as a liability. The Company evaluated these payments and, as a result of this evaluation, increased the 2006 revenue of Park InfusionCare in the amount of approximately $482,000. As a result, an adjustment of approximately $482,000 was recorded in order to increase the revenue and reduce the net loss of the Park InfusionCare subsidiary for the year-ended December 31, 2006. 

In order to remediate this material weakness, the Company has reviewed and will soon document the processes relating to the recording, processing, reconciliation, recognition and reporting of revenue at our Park InfusionCare subsidiary. In addition, the Company has provided additional training, review and supervision of personnel responsible for the billing, collection and accounting of the Park InfusionCare revenue. Based on these measures, the Company’s management believes that evaluation, there hasinternal controls over the Company’s financial statement close and reporting process have been no such changeimproved during the first nine monthsquarter of 2006.2007, but remained ineffective due to the remediated controls not being fully implemented for a reasonable amount of time prior to March 31, 2007.
 
It shouldNotwithstanding the material weakness described above, management believes the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Interim Chief Financial Officer have certified that, to their knowledge, the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company for the periods presented.

The effectiveness of these measures will be notedsubject to ongoing management review supported by confirmation and testing by management as well as audit committee oversight. As a result, the Company expects that additional changes will be made to its processes as time progresses.

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any system of controls howeverand procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and not absolute, assurance thatmanagement is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the objectivescost-benefit relationship of the system will be met.possible controls and procedures. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events.

However, due
-27-



Due to the limited size of the Company’s staff, there is inherently a lack of segregation of duties related to the authorization, recording, processing, and reporting of transactions. WeThe Company will continue to periodically assess the cost versus benefit of adding the resources that would improve segregation of duties and currently,duties. Currently, with the concurrence of the board of directors, dothe Company does not consider the benefits to outweigh the costs of adding additional staff in light of the limited number of transactions related to the company’sCompany’s operations.


-31--28-



  
PART II.

OTHER INFORMATION
 
ITEM 1.  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS 

In April 2006, we were notified byThere have been no material changes in the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) that our federal income tax returnCompany’s legal proceedings during the three months ended March 31, 2007 as described in Item 3 of Part I of the Company’s Form 10-K for the 2004 tax year had been selected for review. In addition, in Septemberended December 31, 2006, we were notified byas filed with the IRS that the federal partnership income tax return of CPOC for the 2004 tax year had been selected for review. The IRS is currently conducting its reviews. At this time, we can make no representations regarding the potential outcome of this review and the impact, if any,SEC on our financial position. However, we are not aware of any potential issues that may cause adjustment to our filed tax returns.

On September 25, 2006, the Chapter 7 trustee for the bankruptcy estate of Quantum North America, Inc. sought to enforce two default judgments against us for alleged preferential and fraudulent transfers to the Company's predecessor, ASD Systems, Inc. in the aggregate amount of approximately $150,000, plus interest and attorneys fees. The transfers at issue occurred in 2000. The adversary proceedings filed in the bankruptcy case were styled: David Gottlieb v. ASD Systems, Inc.; Adv. Nos. 1:02-ap-02131-GM and 1:02-ap-01948. We believe that the judgments should be set aside as void since the service of the underlying complaints was defective and neither us nor ASD Systems were afforded the opportunity to defend. If the default judgments are set aside, we intend to defend the claims based on several available defenses. We anticipate that the hearing to consider the enforceability of the judgments will be in December 2006.

We are also occasionally involved in other claims and proceedings, which are incidental to our business. We cannot determine what, if any, material effect these matters will have on our future financial position and results of operations.April 16, 2007.

ITEM 1A.
RISK FACTORS

The risk factor presented below updates and replaces the risk factor entitled “We may not be able to enter into a successful transaction to sell or otherwise dispose of our Park InfusionCare business” disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005 and should be considered in addition to the risk factors disclosed in such Annual Report. There have been no other material changes to the Company’s risk factors as disclosed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors”, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.

We may not be able to successfully operate the Park InfusionCare business.

On November 3, 2005, we issued a press release announcing that the board of directors of DHI committed to a plan to explore strategic alternatives for its infusion therapy business, Park InfusionCare. On May 24, 2006, the board of directors decided to retain the operations of Park InfusionCare.

The infusion markets served by Park InfusionCare are highly competitive. Local, regional and national companies are currently competing in these markets and others may do so in the future. Some of our competitors have greater financial, technical, marketing and managerial resources than we have. This competition could result in price competition and other competitive factors that could cause a decline in our revenue and profitability. We expect to continue to encounter competition in the future that could limit our ability to grow revenue and/or maintain acceptable pricing levels. In addition, the Park InfusionCare business has required additional working capital. If we are unable to successfully operate Park InfusionCare, our working capital position will be adversely affected and we could experience a decline in our revenue and profitability.

2006.

-32--29-





ITEM 6.  EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)Exhibits

 3.1Certificate of Incorporation of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.1 to our Form 8-K filed October 23, 2000, File no. 0-27945).
 
 3.2Bylaws of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference from Exhibit 3.2 to our Form 8-K filed October 23, 2000, File no. 0-27945).
 
 31.1Written Statement of President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

 31.2Written Statement of Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
 
 32.1Certification of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006,March 31, 2007, by David E. Bowe as President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

 32.2Certification of Ascendant Solutions, Inc. Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2006,March 31, 2007, by Michal L. Gayler as Interim Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*

* Filed herewith.

(b)  Reports on Form 8-K

(i)
On August 10, 2006, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K to report the announcement of its second quarter fiscal 2006 financial results.

(ii)
On September 8, 2006, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K to report the announcement of the resignation of Gary W. Boyd as Vice-President - Finance and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. In addition, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the appointment of Michal L. Gayler as Interim Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company.

(iii)
On September 12, 2006, the Company filed a Current Report on Form 8-K to report the announcement of the election of Mr. Curt Nonomaque to fill the vacant Class A Board of Directors position.
 

 

-33--30-

ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements



SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
    
ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC
 
Date: November 13, 2006May 14, 2007 
ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
  By: 
/s/ David E. Bowe
    
David E. Bowe
    
President and Chief Executive Officer
    
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Executive Officer)
     
 

     
Date: November 13, 2006May 14, 2007 
ASCENDANT SOLUTIONS, INC.
  By: 
/s/ Michal L. Gayler
    
Michal L. Gayler
    
Interim Vice President-Finance and Chief Financial Officer
    
(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer)
     


-34--31-