UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

~~(Mark One)~~		(Mark One)

x		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

		For the quarterly period ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008

		OR
		o
o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number 0-16244

VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware		11-2989601
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		~~(I.R.S. Employer~~ ~~Identification Number)~~
~~100 Sunnyside Boulevard, Suite B~~ ~~Woodbury, New York~~		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
Terminal Drive ~~11797-2902~~Plainview, New York	~~(Zip Code)~~	11803
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (516) 677-0200

Website: www.veeco.com

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~Registrant:~~registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the ~~Registrant~~registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the ~~Registrant~~registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a ~~non-accelerated filer.~~smaller reporting company. See ~~definition~~the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and ~~large accelerated filer”~~“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. ~~(Check one):~~

Large accelerated filer x
Accelerated filer o
~~Large accelerated filer~~ x ~~Accelerated filer~~ oNon-accelerated filer o
Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

~~31,767,392~~32,187,122 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value per share, were outstanding as of the close of business on October ~~29, 2007.~~27, 2008.

Table of Contents

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Discussions containing such forward-looking statements may be found in Items 2 and 3 hereof, as well as within this Report generally. In addition, when used in this Report, the words “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “estimates,” “plans,” “intends,” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from projected results. These risks and uncertainties include, without limitation, the following:

·The recent turmoil in the world’s credit markets may have a protracted adverse impact on capital spending in the markets we serve and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

•· The cyclicality of the ~~microelectronics~~ industries we serve directly affects our business.

•· We operate in an industry characterized by rapid technological change.

•· We face significant competition.

•· We depend on a limited number of customers that operate in highly concentrated industries.

•· ~~Our~~The timing of our orders, shipments, and revenue recognition may cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly.

•· Changes in our product mix may cause our quarterly operating results to fluctuate significantly.

·Our customers may cancel or reschedule their orders with us.

·Our sales cycle is long and unpredictable.

·Our outsourcing strategy could adversely affect our results of operations.

•· We rely on a limited number of suppliers.

•· ~~Any difficulty or~~Our inability to attract, retain, and motivate key employees could have a material adverse effect on our business.

•· We are exposed to the risks of operating a global ~~business and the requirement to comply with laws and regulations of various jurisdictions such as import/export controls, which may not apply to our non-U.S. competitors.~~business.

•· We are subject to foreign currency exchange risks.

•· Our success depends on protection of our intellectual property rights.

•· We may be subject to claims of intellectual property infringement by others.

•· Our acquisition strategy subjects us to risks associated with evaluating and pursuing these opportunities and integrating these businesses.

•· ~~Changes in accounting standards for stock-based compensation may adversely affect our stock price and our ability to attract, motivate and retain key employees.~~

• ~~The implementation of a new information technology system may disrupt our operations.~~

• ~~We face securities class action and shareholder derivative lawsuits which could result in substantial costs, diversion of management’s attention and resources and negative publicity.~~

•We may not obtain sufficient affordable funds to finance our future needs.

•· We are subject to risks of non-compliance with environmental and safety regulations.

•· We have adopted certain measures that may have anti-takeover effects which may make an acquisition of our company by another company more difficult.

Table of Contents

•· The other matters discussed under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” contained in this Report and in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2006~~2007 of Veeco Instruments Inc. (“~~Veeco”~~Veeco,” the “Company,” or ~~the “Company”~~“we”).

Consequently, such forward-looking statements should be regarded solely as our current plans, estimates and beliefs. We do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect future events or circumstances after the date of such statements.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, information statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that site is http://www.sec.gov.

Internet Address

We maintain a website where additional information concerning our business and various upcoming events can be found. The address of our website is www.veeco.com. We provide a link on our website, under Investors — Financial Information — SEC Filings, through which investors can access our filings with the SEC, including our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and all amendments to ~~those~~such reports. These filings are posted to our Internet site, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with the SEC.

Table of Contents

VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC.

INDEX


			Page
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION		~~Page~~

Item 1.	Financial ~~Statements (Unaudited):~~Statements:

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 ~~and 2006~~(Unaudited)	5

	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2007~~2008 (Unaudited) and December 31, ~~2006~~2007	6

	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 ~~and 2006~~(Unaudited)	7

	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	8

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1617

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2728

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	2829

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	2829

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	29

Item 6.	Exhibits	2930

SIGNATURES		3031

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements~~(Unaudited)~~

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations ~~Operations~~

(In thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2007

2006

2007

2006

Net sales

$
97,718

$
112,369

$
295,653

$
317,922

Cost of sales

61,824

64,513

173,819

178,585

Gross profit

35,894

47,856

121,834

139,337

Costs and expenses:

Selling, general and administrative expense

22,723

22,296

69,347

68,622

Research and development expense

15,049

15,716

46,341

45,554

Amortization expense

1,959

4,025

8,236

12,029

Restructuring expense

529

—

1,974

—

Write-off of purchased in-process technology

—

1,160

—

1,160

Other income, net

(179
)
(310
)
(605
)
(243
)
Total operating expenses

40,081

42,887

125,293

127,122

Operating (loss) income

(4,187
)
4,969

(3,459
)
12,215

Interest expense, net

665

1,056

2,256

3,583

Gain on extinguishment of debt

—

—

(738
)
(330
)
(Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

(4,852
)
3,913

(4,977
)
8,962

Income tax provision

954

612

3,490

2,878

Noncontrolling interest

(123
)
(1,207
)
(482
)
(1,207
)
Net (loss) income

$
(5,683
)
$
4,508

$
(7,985
)
$
7,291

Net (loss) income per common share

$
(0.18
)
$
0.15

$
(0.26
)
$
0.24

Diluted net (loss) income per common share

$
(0.18
)
$
0.14

$
(0.26
)
$
0.23

Weighted average shares outstanding

31,100

30,693

30,975

30,369

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

31,100

31,393

30,975

31,100

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Net sales	$	115,709		$	97,718		$	332,465		$	295,653
Cost of sales	69,626			61,824			196,026			173,819
Gross profit	46,083			35,894			136,439			121,834
Operating expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative expense	23,589			22,723			70,528			69,347
Research and development expense	15,302			15,049			45,173			46,341
Amortization expense	3,148			1,959			7,530			8,236
Restructuring expense	4,120			529			6,995			1,974
Asset impairment charge	—			—			285			—
Other income, net	(213		)	(179		)	(591		)	(605		)
Total operating expenses	45,946			40,081			129,920			125,293
Operating income (loss)	137			(4,187		)	6,519			(3,459		)
Interest expense, net	1,052			665			2,913			2,256
Gain on extinguishment of debt	—			—			—			(738		)
(Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest	(915		)	(4,852		)	3,606			(4,977		)
Income tax provision	812			954			2,860			3,490
Noncontrolling interest	(54		)	(123		)	(200		)	(482		)
Net (loss) income	$	(1,673	)	$	(5,683	)	$	946		$	(7,985	)

(Loss) income per common share:
Net (loss) income per common share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.18	)	$	0.03		$	(0.26	)
Diluted net (loss) income per common share	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.18	)	$	0.03		$	(0.26	)

Weighted average shares outstanding	31,458			31,100			31,293			30,975
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	31,458			31,100			31,498			30,975

See accompanying notes.

Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands)

	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006		September 30,		December 31,
	(Unaudited)				2008		2007
					(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	108,402	$	147,046	$	117,684	$	117,083
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $2,728 in 2007 and $2,683 in 2006	68,603		86,589
Accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $988 in 2008 and $984 in 2007					71,919		75,207
Inventories	105,659		100,355		105,659		98,594
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	10,254		9,378		7,453		8,901
Deferred income taxes	2,605		2,565		2,781		2,649
Total current assets	295,523		345,933		305,496		302,434
Property, plant and equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation of $93,559 in 2007 and $88,087 in 2006	69,505		73,510
Property, plant, and equipment at cost, net					66,493		66,142
Goodwill	100,898		100,898		105,355		100,898
Purchased technology, less accumulated amortization of $71,119 in 2007 and $64,736 in 2006	37,469		43,852
Other intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $28,936 in 2007 and $26,740 in 2006	23,754		25,053
Purchased technology, less accumulated amortization of $76,563 in 2008 and $72,481 in 2007					34,470		36,107
Other intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $34,447 in 2008 and $29,886 in 2007					27,610		23,540
Other assets	215		354		193		213
Total assets	$	527,364	$	589,600	$	539,617	$	529,334

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	35,619	$	40,588	$	33,358	$	36,639
Accrued expenses	50,369		48,714		61,820		60,201
Deferred profit	1,342		251		4,814		3,250
Income taxes payable	1,382		2,723		1,084		2,278
Current portion of long-term debt	5,434		5,597		25,426		25,550
Total current liabilities	94,146		97,873		126,502		127,918
Deferred income taxes	3,470		2,423		4,995		3,712
Long-term debt	146,450		203,607		120,889		121,035
Other non-current liabilities	1,716		2,304		2,185		1,978

Noncontrolling interest	1,160		1,642		814		1,014

Shareholders’ equity	280,422		281,751
Total shareholders’ equity					284,232		273,677
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	527,364	$	589,600	$	539,617	$	529,334

See accompanying notes.

Table of Contents

Veeco Instruments Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2007

2006

Operating activities

Net (loss) income

$
(7,985
)
$
7,291

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization

19,288

22,426

Deferred income taxes

1,111

291

Gain on extinguishment of debt

(738
)
(330
)
Non-cash compensation expense for share-based payments

3,490

1,443

Noncontrolling interest in net loss of subsidiary

(482
)
(1,207
)
Gain on sale of property, plant and equipment

(79
)
(27
)
Write-off of purchased in-process technology

—

1,160

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable

19,972

3,103

Inventories

(4,801
)
(14,691
)
Accounts payable

(5,042
)
5,025

Accrued expenses, deferred profit and other current liabilities

524

3,159

Other, net

(2,481
)
(5,119
)
Net cash provided by operating activities

22,777

22,524

Investing activities

Capital expenditures

(6,854
)
(12,473
)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment

311

35

Payments for net assets of businesses acquired

—

(3,068
)
Net maturities of investments

—

(128
)
Net cash used in investing activities

(6,543
)
(15,634
)

Financing activities

Proceeds from stock issuance

2,781

15,082

Repayments of long-term debt

(55,407
)
(19,680
)
Payments for debt issuance costs

(1,503
)
—

Other

(314
)
—

Net cash used in financing activities

(54,443
)
(4,598
)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents

(435
)
(226
)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents

(38,644
)
2,066

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period

147,046

124,499

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period

$
108,402

$
126,565

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities

Exchange of convertible subordinated notes

$
118,766

$
—

Transfers from property, plant and equipment to inventory

473

1,515

Transfers from inventory to property, plant and equipment

78

743

Acquisition of assets in connection with the consolidation of a variable interest entity

—

3,550

Assumption of liabilities in connection with the consolidation of a variable interest entity

—

643

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2008			2007
Operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	946		$	(7,985	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	18,138			19,288
Deferred income taxes	1,260			1,111
Non-cash restructuring charge	3,018			—
Net gain on extinguishment of long-term debt	—			(738		)
Non-cash compensation expense for stock options and restricted stock	5,671			3,490
Noncontrolling interest	(200		)	(482		)
Non-cash asset impairment charge	285			—
Gain on sale of property, plant, and equipment	(67		)	(79		)
Bad debt expense	4			40
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable	6,663			19,932
Inventories	(1,703		)	(4,801		)
Accounts payable	(4,168		)	(5,042		)
Accrued expenses, deferred profit, and other current liabilities	(5,449		)	524
Other, net	(1,978		)	(2,481		)
Net cash provided by operating activities	22,420			22,777
Investing activities
Capital expenditures	(10,430		)	(6,854		)
Payments for net assets of business acquired, net of cash acquired	(10,970		)	—
Proceeds from sale of property, plant, and equipment	104			311
Net cash used in investing activities	(21,296		)	(6,543		)
Financing activities
Proceeds from stock issuances	681			2,781
Repayments of long-term debt	(270		)	(55,407		)
Payments for debt issuance costs	—			(1,503		)
Restricted stock tax withholdings	(969		)	(314		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(558		)	(54,443		)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	35			(435		)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	601			(38,644		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	117,083			147,046
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	117,684		$	108,402

Non-cash investing and financing activities
Accrual of earn-out payments for business acquired	$	3,527		$	—
Exchange of convertible subordinated notes	$	—		$	118,766
Transfers from property, plant, and equipment to inventory	$	404		$	473
Transfers from inventory to property, plant, and equipment	$	385		$	78

See accompanying notes.

Table of Contents

VEECO INSTRUMENTS INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Note 1—Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation (consisting of normal recurring accruals) have been included. Operating results for the three months and nine months ended September 30, ~~2007,~~2008, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, ~~2007.~~2008. For further information, refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in ~~the Company’s~~our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2006.~~2007.

Consistent with prior years, ~~the Company reports~~we report interim quarters, other than fourth quarters which always end on December 31, on a 13-week basis ending on the last Sunday within such period. The interim quarter ends are determined at the beginning of each year based on the 13-week quarters. The 2008 interim quarter ends are March 30, June 29, and September 28. The 2007 interim quarter ends ~~are~~were April 1, July 1, and September 30. ~~The 2006 interim quarter ends were April 2, July 2, and October 1.~~ For ease of reference, ~~the Company reports~~we report these interim quarter ends as March 31, June 30, and September 30 in ~~its~~our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

Net (Loss) Income Per Common Share

The following table sets forth the reconciliation of weighted average shares outstanding and diluted weighted average shares outstanding:

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2007

2006

2007

2006

(In thousands )

Weighted average shares outstanding

31,100

30,693

30,975

30,369

Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards

—

700

—

731

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding

31,100

31,393

30,975

31,100

	Three months ended September 30,		Nine months ended September 30,
	2008	2007	2008	2007

Weighted average shares outstanding	31,458	31,100	31,293	30,975
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards and units	—	—	205	—
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	31,458	31,100	31,498	30,975

Net (loss) income ~~and diluted net (loss) income~~ per common share ~~are~~is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net (loss) income per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and common equivalent shares outstanding during the period.

During the ~~three~~three-month period ended September 30, 2008, options to purchase 5.7 million shares of common stock (at prices ranging from $0.27 to $72.00 per share) were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to the net loss sustained for the period, which caused their effect to be antidilutive. During the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008, options to purchase 4.8 million shares of common stock (at prices ranging from $16.56 to $72.00 per share), respectively, were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share due to exercise prices that exceeded the average market price of our common stock for the period. During the three-month and ~~nine month~~nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007, options to purchase 5.7 million shares of common stock (at prices ranging from $0.27 to $72.00 per share) ~~that were outstanding~~in both periods were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per ~~share. During~~share due to the comparable 2006 periods, options to purchase 2.9 million shares (at prices ranging from $23.11 to $72.00 per share) and 3.0 million shares (at prices ranging from $22.63 to $72.00 per share) of common stock that were outstanding were excluded fromnet loss sustained for the computation of diluted earnings per share. In the 2007 periods, the Company recorded net losses, so the effect of all options outstanding was anti-dilutive. In 2006, the exercise price of these options exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common stock, thereby causingperiod, which caused their effect to be ~~anti-dilutive.~~antidilutive.

During the second quarter of 2007, ~~the Company issued~~we exchanged $118.8 million of our unsecured 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due December 2008 (the “Old Notes”) for $117.8 million of a new series of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes (the “New Notes”) due April 15, 2012 (the "New Notes") pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders of its outstanding 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due 2008 (the "Old Notes"). In total, the Company exchanged $118.8 million of Old Notes for $117.8 million of New Notes.

2012. The effect on diluted shares of the assumed conversion of the Old Notes iswas approximately 0.7 million and 2.2 million common equivalent shares for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007, ~~respectively, and 5.2 million and 5.3 million for the comparable periods of 2006,~~ respectively. The converted shares ~~are~~were anti-dilutive and, therefore, ~~are~~were not

included in the weighted shares outstanding for the three months and nine months ended September 30, ~~2007 and 2006, respectively.~~2007. The ~~second quarter 2007 debt~~

Table of Contents

exchange of the Old Notes for the New Notes, together with ~~the~~ $56 million in ~~debt~~ repurchases of Old Notes during the first quarter of 2007 reduced the effect ~~on earnings per share~~ of the assumed conversion of the Old Notes, which was calculated using the “if converted” method of accounting. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008, the weighted-average effect on diluted shares of the assumed conversion of the remaining $25.2 million of Old Notes is approximately 0.7 million shares in each period.

The New Notes meet the criteria for determining the effect of the assumed conversion using the treasury stock method of accounting, as long as ~~the Company has~~we have the ability and the intent to settle the principal amount ~~of the New Notes~~ in cash. Under the terms of the New Notes, ~~the Company~~we may pay the principal amount of converted New Notes in cash or in shares of common stock. ~~The Company has~~We have indicated that ~~it intends~~we intend to pay such amounts in cash. Using the treasury stock method, the impact of the assumed conversion of the New Notes is anti-dilutive for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, as the average stock price was below the conversion price of $27.23 for ~~both periods.~~each period. The effect of the assumed converted shares is dependent on the stock price at the time of the conversion. The maximum number of common equivalent shares issuable upon conversion ~~inclusive of the maximum make whole provision~~ is approximately 6.0 million. See Note 8 for further details on our debt.

~~Income~~ ~~Taxes~~Fair Value Measurements

In ~~July~~September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) ~~issued FASB Interpretation Number 48,~~ ~~Accounting for Uncertainty~~ ~~in Income Taxes~~ ~~(“FIN 48”)~~~~, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109~~ (“SFAS 109”), which became effective for Veeco on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 addresses the determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN 48, the Company must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such uncertain tax positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and regulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous. The Company is required to make many subjective assumptions and judgments regarding its income tax exposures. Interpretations of and guidance surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time and changes in assumptions and judgments can materially affect the amounts recognized in the Company’s ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements. The impact of the Company’s reassessment of its tax positions in accordance with FIN 48 during the first quarter of 2007 resulted in a $0.8 million reduction to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. For additional information regarding the adoption of FIN 48, see Note 5, ~~Income Taxes~~.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~In September 2006, the FASB~~ issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“(“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 establishes a common definition for fair value to be applied to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosure about such fair value measurements. SFAS 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (“(“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure financial assets and liabilities (except for those that are specifically ~~scoped out~~excluded from the scope of the Statement) at fair value. The election to measure a financial asset or liability at fair value can be made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. The difference between carrying value and fair value at the election date is recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. Subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in earnings.

Effective January 1, 2008, we adopted SFAS ~~159~~157 and SFAS 159. Since we do not have any financial assets and liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value, the only impact of these adoptions will be on the disclosures required by SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2008.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, EffectiveDate of FASB Statement No. 157 (“FSP 157-2”). FSP 157-2 amends SFAS 157 to delay the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually). For items within its scope, FSP 157-2 defers the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting the provisions of SFAS 157 for non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed on a non-recurring basis.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141(R)”) and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements – an Amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS 160”). Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition date at fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS 141(R) also changes the accounting treatment for certain other items that relate to business combinations. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. The purpose of SFAS 160 is to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements. The most significant provisions of this statement result in changes to the presentation of noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after ~~November~~December 15, ~~2007.~~2008. The adoption of this statement iswill impact the manner in which we present noncontrolling interests, but will not ~~expected to have a material~~ impact ~~on the Company’s~~our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Table of Contents

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 changes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008 and requires comparative disclosures only for periods subsequent to initial adoption. The adoption of the provisions of SFAS 161 will not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement) (“FSP APB 14-1”). The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. FSP APB 14-1 will require issuers of convertible debt that can be settled in cash to separately account for (i.e. bifurcate) a portion of the debt associated with the conversion feature and reclassify this portion to stockholders’ equity. The liability portion, which represents the fair value of the debt without the conversion feature, will be accreted to its face value over the life of the debt using the effective interest method, with the accretion expense recorded to interest. FSP APB 14-1 will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle on periods prior to those presented will be recognized as of the beginning of the first period presented. We expect the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 to have a material effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and earnings per share. Effective as of date of issuance of the New Notes, we will reclassify approximately $16.3 million from long-term debt to additional paid-in capital, and as of the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 in the beginning of 2009, our accumulated deficit will reflect approximately $4.8 million of debt accretion that occurred between the issuance date of the New Notes and the adoption date. Approximately $3.2 to $3.7 million of additional interest expense will be recorded annually from the adoption date through the maturity date of the convertible debt. This additional interest expense will not require the use of cash.

Note 2—Acquisition of Mill Lane Engineering

On May 22, 2008, we acquired Mill Lane Engineering Co., Inc. (“Mill Lane”), a privately held manufacturer of web coating systems for flexible solar panels, for a purchase price of $11.0 million, net of cash acquired, plus potential future earn-out payments of up to $19.0 million (representing additional purchase price) contingent upon the future achievement of certain operating performance criteria. Fees related to the acquisition were $0.7 million. Mill Lane is based in Lowell, Massachusetts and at the time of acquisition had approximately 20 employees. Mill Lane has been renamed Veeco Solar Equipment Inc. (“Veeco Solar”), and its financial results are included in our LED & Solar Process Equipment segment (see Note 5) as of the acquisition date. We have determined that this acquisition does not constitute a material business combination and therefore are not including pro forma financial statements in this report.

Note 3—Share-Based Payments

Stock Option and Restricted ~~Stock-Based~~Stock Compensation

Share-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as expense over the employee requisite service period in accordance with FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS 123(R)”). The following compensation expense was included in

the condensed consolidated ~~statement~~statements of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008 and ~~2006~~2007 (in thousands):

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Nine Months Ended
September 30,

2007

2006

2007

2006

Share-based compensation expense

$
1,505

$
722

$
3,490

$
1,442

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Share-based compensation expense	$	2,048	$	1,505	$	5,671	$	3,490

As of September 30, ~~2007,~~2008, the total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock awards ~~is $10.3 million~~ and to stock option awards is ~~$3.7 million.~~$10.6 million and $7.8 million, respectively. The related weighted average period over which ~~it is expected~~we expect that such unrecognized compensation costs will be recognized as expense is approximately ~~2.4~~2.5 years for both the nonvested stock awards and ~~2.5 years for~~the option awards.

During the third quarter of 2008, we granted to certain key employees 14,500 shares of restricted common

Table of Contents

stock, 10,000 restricted stock units, and 61,000 stock options. The stock options will vest over a three-year period and the restricted stock awards and units will vest over a four-year period.

A summary of ~~the Company’s~~our restricted stock awards including restricted stock units as of and for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007,~~2008, is presented below:

			Weighted-
	Shares		Average
	(In		Grant-Date
	thousands)		Fair Value		Shares (000s)		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Nonvested at beginning of year	244		$	22.50	680		$	19.50
Granted	505		19.25		384		17.30
Vested	(93	)	25.08		(361	)	19.67
Forfeited	(50	)	18.17
Nonvested as of September 30, 2007	606		19.75
Forfeited (including cancelled awards)					(23	)	18.40
Nonvested at September 30, 2008					680		18.21

A summary of ~~the Company’s~~our stock option plans as of and for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007,~~2008, is presented below:

							Weighted-
					Aggregate		Average
			Weighted-		Intrinsic		Remaining
	Shares		Average		Value		Contractual
	(In		Exercise		(In		Life
	thousands)		Price		thousands)		(in years)	Shares (000s)		Weighted- Average Exercise Price		Aggregate Intrinsic Value (000s)		Weighted- Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)
Outstanding at beginning of year	6,363		$	25.58				5,672		$	23.04
Granted	603		19.58					1,226		17.35
Exercised	(169	)	15.72					(58	)	11.71
Forfeited (including cancelled options)	(1,079	)	35.46					(1,117	)	30.78
Outstanding at September 30, 2007	5,718		$	23.37	$	6,049	3.1
Options exercisable at September 30, 2007	5,011		$	23.86	$	5,748	2.6
Outstanding at September 30, 2008								5,723		20.43		$	1,229	3.6
Options exercisable at September 30, 2008								4,114		21.45		$	1,202	2.5

Note 3—4—Balance Sheet Information

Inventories

Inventories have been determined by lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out) or market. Inventories consist ~~of:~~of (in thousands):

September 30, 2007

December 31, 2006

(In thousands )

Parts and components (1)

$
60,121

$
60,249
Work in process (1)

32,192

27,961
Finished goods

13,346

12,145

$
105,659

$
100,355

~~(1) The prior period has been reclassified to conform to current period presentation.~~

	September 30,		December 31,
	2008		2007
Raw materials	$	60,084	$	58,157
Work in process	32,841		27,330
Finished goods	12,734		13,107
	$	105,659	$	98,594

Accrued Warranty

~~The Company estimates~~We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty ~~it provides~~we provide and ~~recognizes~~recognize a

liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Factors that affect ~~the Company’s~~our warranty liability include product failure rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. ~~The Company~~We periodically ~~assesses~~assess the adequacy of ~~its~~our recognized warranty liability and ~~adjusts~~adjust the amount as necessary. Changes in ~~the Company’s~~our warranty liability during the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2007 and 2006~~period are as ~~follows:~~follows (in thousands):

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2007

2006

(In thousands)

Balance as of January 1

$
7,118

$
6,671

Warranties issued during the period

4,170

5,088

Settlements made during the period

(4,788
)
(4,602
)
Balance as of September 30

$
6,500

$
7,157

Table of Contents

	Nine months ended September 30,
	2008			2007
Balance at beginning of period	$	6,502		$	7,118
Warranties issued during the period	4,962			4,170
Settlements made during the period	(4,096		)	(4,788		)
Balance at end of period	$	7,368		$	6,500

Note 4—5—Segment Information

~~The Company manages~~In 2008, we began to manage the business, ~~reviews~~review operating results and ~~assesses~~assess performance, as well as ~~allocates~~allocate resources, based upon ~~two~~three separate reporting ~~segments.~~segments to more accurately reflect the market focus of each business. The Light Emitting Diode (“LED”) & Solar Process Equipment segment ~~combines~~consists of the ~~etch, deposition, dicing and slicing products sold mostly to data storage customers and the molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”) and~~ metal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”) and molecular beam epitaxy (“MBE”) products primarily sold to customers in the high-brightness light emitting diode (“HB-LED”), solar, and wireless ~~telecommunications customers.~~industries, as well as web coaters for flexible photovoltaic applications. This segment has production facilities in Somerset, New Jersey, St. Paul, Minnesota, and Lowell, Massachusetts. The Data Storage Process Equipment segment consists of the ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond like carbon, physical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing products (collectively, Ion Beam and Slider products) sold primarily to customers in the data storage industry. This segment has production facilities in Plainview, New York, Ft. Collins, Colorado, and Camarillo, ~~California, St. Paul, Minnesota and Somerset, New Jersey.~~California. The Metrology segment ~~represents~~consists of products that are used to provide critical surface measurements on items such as semiconductor devices and thin film magnetic heads (“TFMHs”), as well as biological, nanoscience, and material science samples, and includes ~~the Company’s~~our broad line of atomic force microscopes, optical interferometers and stylus profilers sold to customers in the semiconductor ~~customers,~~and data storage ~~customers~~industries and thousands of research facilities and scientific centers. This segment has production facilities in Camarillo and Santa Barbara, California and Tucson, Arizona.

Prior to 2008, we managed the business based on two segments, Process Equipment and Metrology. The ~~Company evaluates~~Process Equipment segment combined the ion beam etch, ion beam deposition, diamond like carbon, physical vapor deposition, and dicing and slicing products with the MOCVD and MBE technologies. This change in segment composition was based upon management’s view that the business segments should coincide more precisely with the markets in which each segment sells its products. The Metrology segment has remained unchanged. The prior year segment financial information presented below has been conformed to the current period presentation.

We evaluate the performance of ~~its~~our reportable segments based on income (loss) from operations before interest, income taxes, amortization and certain items (“EBITA”), which is the primary indicator used to plan and forecast future periods. The presentation of this financial measure facilitates meaningful comparison with prior periods, as management ~~of the Company~~ believes EBITA reports baseline performance and thus provides useful information. Certain items include restructuring expenses, asset impairment charges, ~~for purchased in-process technology, restructuring,~~ and debt-related ~~costs or~~ gains. The accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary of critical accounting policies.

The following tables present certain data pertaining to ~~the reportable product~~our reporting segments ~~of the Company~~ and a reconciliation of EBITA to income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest for the three months and nine months ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008 and ~~2006~~2007, and goodwill and total assets as of September 30, ~~2007~~2008 and December 31, ~~2006~~2007 (in thousands):

Process
Equipment

Metrology

Unallocated
Corporate
Amount

Total
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2007

Net sales

$
62,923

$
34,795

$
—

$
97,718

Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization and certain items (EBITA)

$
2,249

$
(395
)
$
(3,553
)
$
(1,699
)
Interest expense, net

—

—

665

665

Amortization expense

1,444

399

116

1,959

Restructuring expense

159

46

324

529

Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

$
646

$
(840
)
$
(4,658
)
$
(4,852
)

Process
Equipment

Metrology

Unallocated
Corporate
Amount

Total
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2006

Net sales

$
71,375

$
40,994

$
—

$
112,369
Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization and certain items (EBITA)

$
7,482

$
4,352

$
(1,680
)
$
10,154
Interest expense, net

—

—

1,056

1,056
Amortization expense

3,333

433

259

4,025
Write-off of purchased in-process technology

1,160

—

—

1,160
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

$
2,989

$
3,919

$
(2,995
)
$
3,913

Process
Equipment

Metrology

Unallocated
Corporate
Amount

Total
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2007

Net sales

$
181,028

$
114,625

$
—

$
295,653

Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization and certain items (EBITA)

$
11,842

$
4,015

$
(9,106
)
$
6,751

Interest expense, net

—

—

2,256

2,256

Amortization expense

6,628

1,135

473

8,236

Restructuring expense

159

1,398

417

1,974

Gain on extinguishment of debt

—

—

(738
)
(738
)
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

$
5,055

$
1,482

$
(11,514
)
$
(4,977
)

Process
Equipment

Metrology

Unallocated
Corporate
Amount

Total
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2006

Net sales

$
191,927

$
125,995

$
—

$
317,922

Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization and certain items (EBITA)

$
17,159

$
16,280

$
(8,035
)
$
25,404

Interest expense, net

—

—

3,583

3,583

Amortization expense

9,909

1,328

792

12,029

Write-off of purchased in-process technology

1,160

—

—

1,160

Gain on extinguishment of debt

—

—

(330
)
(330
)
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

$
6,090

$
14,952

$
(12,080
)
$
8,962

	LED & Solar Process Equipment		Data Storage Process Equipment		Metrology			Unallocated Corporate Amount			Total
Three months ended September 30, 2008
Net sales	$	40,983	$	43,256	$	31,470		$	—		$	115,709
Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization, and certain items (EBITA)	$	5,477	$	6,739	$	45		$	(3,929	)	$	8,332
Interest expense, net	—		—		—			1,052			1,052
Amortization expense	1,587		952		495			114			3,148
Restructuring expense	—		—		437			3,683			4,120
Purchase accounting adjustment (1)	927		—		—			—			927
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest	$	2,963	$	5,787	$	(887	)	$	(8,778	)	$	(915	)

Table of Contents

Three months ended September 30, 2007
Net sales	$	31,824	$	31,099		$	34,795		$	—		$	97,718
Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization, and certain items (EBITA)	$	3,196	$	(947	)	$	(395	)	$	(3,553	)	$	(1,699	)
Interest expense, net	—		—			—			665			665
Amortization expense	492		952			399			116			1,959
Restructuring expense	—		159			46			324			529
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest	$	2,704	$	(2,058	)	$	(840	)	$	(4,658	)	$	(4,852	)

Nine months ended September 30, 2008
Net sales	$	128,204	$	104,097	$	100,164		$	—		$	332,465
Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization, and certain items (EBITA)	$	22,807	$	10,446	$	618		$	(11,615	)	$	22,256
Interest expense, net	—		—		—			2,913			2,913
Amortization expense	3,040		2,856		1,295			339			7,530
Restructuring expense	7		124		627			6,237			6,995
Asset impairment charge	—		—		—			285			285
Purchase accounting adjustment (1)	927		—		—			—			927
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest	$	18,833	$	7,466	$	(1,304	)	$	(21,389	)	$	3,606

Nine months ended September 30, 2007
Net sales	$	82,188	$	98,840	$	114,625		$	—		$	295,653
Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization, and certain items (EBITA)	$	8,787	$	3,055	$	4,015		$	(9,106	)	$	6,751
Interest expense, net	—		—		—			2,256			2,256
Amortization expense	3,774		2,854		1,135			473			8,236
Restructuring expense	—		159		1,398			417			1,974
Gain on extinguishment of debt	—		—		—			(738		)	(738		)
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest	$	5,013	$	42	$	1,482		$	(11,514	)	$	(4,977	)

	LED & Solar Process Equipment		Data Storage Process Equipment		Metrology		Unallocated Corporate Amount		Total

As of September 30, 2008
Goodwill	$	45,610	$	30,377	$	29,368	$	—	$	105,355
Total assets	132,342		148,531		116,866		141,878		539,617

As of December 31, 2007
Goodwill	$	41,153	$	30,377	$	29,368	$	—	$	100,898
Total assets	121,326		144,944		121,060		142,004		529,334

Process
Equipment

Metrology

Unallocated
Corporate
Amount

Total
As of September 30, 2007

Goodwill

$
71,530

$
29,368

$
—

$
100,898
Total assets

272,842

127,069

127,453

527,364

As of December 31, 2006

Goodwill

$
71,530

$
29,368

$
—

$
100,898
Total assets

285,661

138,140

165,799

589,600

(1) This adjustment relates to the required capitalization of profit in inventory associated with the acquisition of Mill Lane which is included in cost of sales.

Corporate total assets are comprised principally of cash and cash equivalents at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.

Note 5—6—Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes of $1.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007 included $0.6 million relating to Veeco’s foreign operations, which continue to be profitable, and $0.4 million relating to the Company’s domestic operations. The provision for income taxes of $3.5 million forFor the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007 included $2.5~~2008, our reserve for unrecognized tax benefits decreased by approximately $0.3 million primarily due to the expiration of the statute of limitations relating to ~~Veeco’s~~certain foreign operations and $1.0 million relating to the Company’s domestic operations. Due to significant domestic net operating loss carry forwards, which are fully reserved by a valuation allowance, Veeco’s domestic operations are not expected to incur significant income taxes for the foreseeable future.

~~The Company adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007.~~tax positions. As a result, of adopting FIN 48, the Company recognized a $0.8 million increase to its reserves for uncertain tax positions during the first quarter of 2007, which was recorded as a reduction to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance. At the adoption date of January 1, 2007, the Companywe had approximately $2.3 million of unrecognized tax benefits, including the cumulative effect increase to its reserve for uncertain tax positions. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Company recorded $0.1 million and $0.6 million, respectively, related to unrecognized tax benefits. As a result, the Company had $3.0$1.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits at September 30, ~~2007,~~2008, all of which relate to

Table of Contents

positions taken on ~~its~~our foreign tax returns and represent the amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would favorably impact the effective income tax rate in future periods.

~~The Company~~

We or one of ~~its~~our subsidiaries ~~files~~file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state, local, and foreign jurisdictions. All material federal, state, local, and foreign income tax matters have been concluded for years through 2002 subject to subsequent utilization of net operating losses generated in such years. During the third quarter of 2008, the Internal Revenue Service initiated an examination of our Federal income tax return for the calendar year 2006. In addition, our tax returns are under examination in certain foreign jurisdictions.

~~The Company is~~

We are continuing ~~its~~our practice of recognizing interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. The total accrual for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions was approximately ~~$1.1~~$0.4 million as of September 30, 2007, which included $0.2 million accrued during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, the impact of which was to reduce net income by $0.2 million and earnings per diluted share by less than $0.01 for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

2008.

Note 6—7—Comprehensive (Loss) Income

Total comprehensive (loss) income for the three months and nine months ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008 and ~~2006~~2007 was as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,					Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,
	2007			2006			2007			2006		2008			2007			2008		2007

Net (loss) income	$	(5,683	)	$	4,508		$	(7,985	)	$	7,291	$	(1,673	)	$	(5,683	)	$	946	$	(7,985	)
Foreign currency translation	1,481			(1,065		)	1,387			672
Foreign currency translation (loss) gain												(555		)	1,481			1,208		1,387
Total comprehensive (loss) income	$	(4,202	)	$	3,443		$	(6,598	)	$	7,963	$	(2,228	)	$	(4,202	)	$	2,154	$	(6,598	)

Note 7—8—Debt

Convertible Debt

During the first quarter of 2007, ~~the Company~~we repurchased $56.0 million of ~~its~~our ~~4.125% convertible~~Old Notes

~~subordinated notes~~ ~~(the “Old Notes”)~~ for $54.8 million,, reducing the amount of the Old Notes outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 million. As a result of these repurchases, ~~the Company~~we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt of $0.7 million.

~~On April 20,~~During the second quarter of 2007, ~~the Company~~we issued ~~new convertible subordinated notes (the “New Notes”)~~New Notes pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders of the Old Notes. Under these agreements, such holders agreed to exchange ~~$106.4~~$118.8 million aggregate principal amount of the Old Notes for approximately ~~$105.5~~$117.8 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes. On May 1, 2007, the Company issued an additional $12.3 million aggregate principal amount of New Notes in a second round of exchange transactions with the holders of $12.4 million of Old Notes. Following the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2 million of the Old Notes, with a conversion price of $38.51 per common share, remained outstanding. No net gain or loss was recorded on the exchange transactions since the carrying value of the Old Notes including unamortized deferred financing costs approximated the exchange value of the New Notes. Following the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2 million of the Old Notes, with a conversion price of $38.51 per common share, remained outstanding. The Old Notes are due in December 2008, and we expect to pay off these notes through the use of our available cash balances.

The New Notes initially will be convertible into 36.7277 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of New Notes (equivalent to a conversion price of $27.23 per share or a premium of 38% over the closing market price for ~~Veeco’s~~our common stock on April 16, 2007). Holders may convert the New Notes at any time during the period beginning on January 15, 2012 through the close of business on the second day prior to April 15, 2012 and earlier upon the occurrence of certain events including ~~the Company’s~~our common stock trading at prices equal to 130% over the conversion price for a specified period.

Credit Agreement

During the third quarter of 2007, ~~the Company~~we entered into a Credit Agreement with HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent (“HSBC”), and the lenders named therein (the ~~“New Credit~~“Credit Agreement”). The New Credit Agreement amends and restates, and effectively replaces, the prior Credit Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2005, among the Company, HSBC and the lenders named therein (the “Prior Credit Agreement”). The Prior Credit Agreement was set to expire on March 15, 2008.

~~The New~~ Credit Agreement provides for revolving credit borrowings of up to $100.0 million. The annual interest rate under the New Credit Agreement is a floating rate equal to the prime rate of the agent bank. A LIBOR-based interest rate option is also provided. Borrowings may be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital requirements and acquisitions. The New Credit Agreement contains certain restrictive covenants substantially similar to those of the Prior Credit Agreement. These include limitations with respect to the incurrence of indebtedness, the payment of dividends, long-term leases, investments, mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and sales of assets. The Company is required to satisfy certain financial tests under the new Credit Agreement substantially similar to those of the prior Credit Agreement. Substantially all of the assets of the Company and its material domestic subsidiaries, other than real estate, have been pledged to secure the Company’s obligations under the New Credit Agreement. The revolving credit facility under the New Credit Agreement expires on March 31, 2012. In connection with the New Credit Agreement, the Company paid approximately $0.2 million in fees, which will be amortized over the term of the agreement, along with the remaining deferred financing fees of less than $0.1 million associated with the Prior Credit Agreement. As of September 30, ~~2007~~2008 and December 31, ~~2006,~~2007, there were no borrowings outstanding. Interest expense associated with the credit agreement recorded during the ~~period~~nine months ended September 30, 2008 was ~~nominal and~~$0.2 million, of which $0.1 million is included in accrued expenses as of September 30, ~~2007.~~

~~Note 8—Commitments, Contingencies and Other Matters~~

~~Litigation~~

As previously reported in Veeco’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, Veeco and certain of its officers have been named as defendants in a securities class action lawsuit consolidated in August 2005 that is pending in federal court in the Southern District of New York (“the Court”). The lawsuit arises out of the restatement in March 2005 of Veeco’s financial statements for the quarterly periods and nine months ended September 30, 2004 as a result of the Company’s discovery of certain improper accounting transactions at its TurboDisc business unit. On July 5, 2007, ~~Veeco entered into a Memorandum of Understanding to settle and fully resolve this lawsuit~~ for a payment of $5.5 million. Veeco expects that insurance proceeds will cover the settlement amount and any significant legal expenses related to the settlement. The settlement agreement is subject to court approval and would dismiss all pending claims against Veeco and the other defendants with no admission or finding of wrongdoing by Veeco or any of the other defendants, and Veeco and the other defendants would receive a full release of all claims pending in the litigation.

2008.

Table of Contents

Note 9 — Commitments, Contingencies and Other Matters

~~2007~~ Legal Proceedings

On August 11, 2008, we announced that we had settled the patent litigation which we had brought in 2003 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Asylum Research Corporation, a privately-held company founded by former Veeco employees (“Asylum”). In the lawsuit, we had alleged that the manufacture, use, and sale of Asylum’s MFP-3D AFM constituted willful infringement of five patents owned by us, as well as other claims. In the settlement, Veeco and Asylum agreed to drop all pending claims against each other and agreed to a five year, worldwide cross license of each company’s patents and a mutual covenant not to sue on patents either party has a right to assert. Asylum made a net payment to Veeco and will pay an ongoing royalty to Veeco for the five-year term of the cross license. As part of the settlement, Asylum acknowledged the validity of the Veeco patents asserted in the case. During the case, we capitalized legal costs incurred to defend our patents and are now amortizing these capitalized costs over the remaining lives of these patents. Payments received from Asylum have been and will continue to be netted against the capitalized legal costs upon receipt.

Restructuring Expenses

~~In conjunction with~~During 2007, management initiated a ~~cost reduction~~profit improvement plan, the Company recognized a restructuring charge of approximately $0.5 million and $2.0 million during the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007, respectively, which was recorded as restructuring expenseresulting in ~~the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The charge consisted of personnel~~ severance costs for approximately 4090 employees, or approximately 3%7.5% of ~~total~~our employees, which included management, administration, and manufacturing employees companywide. ~~As of September 30, 2007, approximately $0.9 million has been paid and approximately $1.1 million remains accrued. The remainder is expected~~Furthermore, we took additional measures to ~~be paid over the next twelve to eighteen months.~~

~~The following is a reconciliation of the liability for the restructuring charge (in thousands):~~

Process
Equipment

Metrology

Corporate

Total
Charged to accrual

$
159

$
1,398

$
417

$
1,974

Cash payments during 2007

(93
)
(692
)
(70
)
(855
)
Balance as of September 30, 2007

$
66

$
706

$
347

$
1,119

~~Note 9—Subsequent Events~~

~~During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a~~ ~~cost reduction plan that included a reduction in staff (employees, consultants and temporary workers),~~improve profitability, including a reduction of discretionary expenses, realignment of ~~the Company’s~~our sales organization to more closely match current market and regional opportunities, and consolidation of certain engineering ~~groups. As a result, during~~groups within our data storage business, which included the ~~fourth quarter~~discontinuation of ~~2007, the Company expects to reduce its employment level by approximately 100 employees and will recognize~~two products. In conjunction with these activities, we recognized a restructuring charge of ~~$5.0~~approximately $6.7 million during 2007.

During the first quarter of 2008, we consolidated our Corporate headquarters into our Plainview, New York location. As a result, we incurred an additional restructuring charge of $2.6 million, representing the remaining lease rentals and estimated property taxes for the facility we vacated, offset by the estimated expected sublease income to be received. We made certain assumptions in determining the charge, which included estimated sublease income and terms of the sublease as well as the estimated discount rate to be used in determining the fair value of the liability. We developed these assumptions based on our understanding of the current real estate market as well as current market interest rates. The assumptions were based on management’s best estimates, and will be adjusted periodically if better information is obtained.

During the second quarter of 2008, we did not incur any additional restructuring charges. During the third quarter of 2008, we recorded a charge of $4.1 million, comprised ~~predominantly~~ of the following: $3.7 million related to a mutually agreed-upon termination of the employment agreement with Veeco’s former CEO following the successful completion of the CEO transition, which included a charge of $3.0 million for the acceleration of stock-based compensation expense; personnel severance costs of $0.1 million for Metrology employees; and $0.3 million in lease-related expenses associated with the termination of the lease for a Metrology facility in Santa Barbara, California. Restructuring expenses for the ~~related employees.~~three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 are as follows (in thousands):

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2008		2007		2008		2007
Lease-related costs	$	282	$	—	$	2,836	$	—
Personnel severance costs	820		529		1,141		1,974
Modification of equity awards	3,018		—		3,018		—
Total restructuring expense	$	4,120	$	529	$	6,995	$	1,974

The following is a reconciliation of the liability for the restructuring charge from inception through September 30, 2008 (in thousands):

Table of Contents

	LED & Solar Process Equipment			Data Storage Process Equipment			Metrology			Unallocated Corporate			Total
Short-Term Liability
2007 Activity
Personnel severance charges	$	34		$	658		$	1,153		$	2,469		$	4,314
Purchase order commitments	—			1,840			—			—			1,840
Total charged to accrual (1)	34			2,498			1,153			2,469			6,154

Cash payments	(17		)	(435		)	(751		)	(633		)	(1,836		)
Balance as of December 31, 2007	17			2,063			402			1,836			4,318

2008 Activity
Lease-related costs	—			—			282			971			1,253
Personnel severance charges	7			124			344			666			1,141
Total charged to accrual (2)	7			124			626			1,637			2,394

Short-term/long-term reclassification	—			—			—			25			25
Cash payments	(15		)	(2,069		)	(780		)	(2,369		)	(5,233		)
Balance as of September 30, 2008	$	9		$	118		$	249		$	1,128		$	1,504

Long-Term Liability
2008
Lease-related costs	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1,583		$	1,583

Short-term/long-term reclassification	—			—			—			(25		)	(25		)
Other adjustments	—			—			—			(172		)	(172		)
Balance as of September 30, 2008	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	1,386		$	1,386

(1) In 2007, a charge of $0.6 million for the modification of stock options was recorded as part of a termination agreement with each of five key employees as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

(2) In 2008, a charge of $3.0 million for the acceleration of equity awards was recorded as part of a mutually agreed upon termination with our former CEO (who currently remains as Chairman of the Board of Directors) as an increase to additional paid-in capital.

The balance of the restructuring accrual is expected to be paid over the next thirty-three months, or the remaining life of the lease for the former Corporate headquarters. Given the recent change in business climate, management is currently evaluating various cost cutting actions, and it is likely that we will incur restructuring charges in the fourth quarter, depending upon the timing and extent of actions under consideration. We are not able to estimate the extent of these charges at this time.

In addition to restructuring expenses, during the first quarter of 2008, we recorded a $0.3 million asset impairment charge associated with property and equipment abandoned as part of the consolidation of our Corporate headquarters into our Plainview facility.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Executive Summary

~~Veeco designs, manufactures, markets~~We design, manufacture, market, and ~~services a broad line of equipment primarily used by manufacturers~~service enabling solutions for customers in the HB-LED, solar, data storage, semiconductor, scientific research and industrial ~~research, semiconductor, high-brightness light emitting diode (“HB-LED”)~~markets. We have leading technology positions in our three businesses: LED & Solar Process Equipment, Data Storage Process Equipment, and wireless industries. These industries help create a wide range of information age products such as computer integrated circuits, personal computers, LEDs for backlighting and automotive applications, hard disk drives, network servers, digital cameras, wireless phones, TV set-top boxes, personal music/video players, and personal digital assistants. Veeco’s broad line of products features leading edge technology and allows customers to improve time-to-market of their next generation products. Veeco’s products are also enabling advancements in the growing fields of nanoscience, nanobiology, and other areas of scientific and industrial research.Metrology.

~~Veeco’s~~Our LED & Solar Process Equipment products, ~~precisely deposit or remove (etch) various materials~~which include MOCVD and MBE technologies, and web coaters for flexible photovoltaic applications, are used in the manufacturing of ~~thin film magnetic heads (“TFMHs”) for the data storage industry, HB-LED/~~HB-LEDs and wireless devices (such as power ~~amplifiers~~amplifiers) and ~~laser diodes),~~solar panels. Our Data Storage Process Equipment products, which include ion beam etch and ~~semiconductor mask reticles. Veeco’s~~deposition, physical vapor deposition and other technologies, are used primarily in the manufacturing of TFMHs for the data storage industry. Our Metrology equipment includes atomic force microscopes (“AFMs”), scanning probe microscopes (“SPMs”), optical interferometers, and stylus profilers, and is used to provide critical surface measurements ~~on semiconductor devices~~in research and ~~TFMHs. This~~production environments. In production, our equipment allows customers, such as those in semiconductor and data storage, to monitor their products throughout the manufacturing process in order to improve yields, reduce costs, and improve product quality. ~~Veeco’s Metrology solutions~~Our instruments are also ~~used by many universities, scientific laboratories, and industrial applications. Veeco sells its broad line of atomic force microscopes (“AFMs”), optical interferometers, and stylus profilers~~sold to thousands of universities, research facilities and scientific centers ~~worldwide.~~worldwide to enable a variety of nanotechnology related research.

~~Veeco~~We currently ~~maintains manufacturing~~maintain facilities in Arizona, California, Colorado, Minnesota, New Jersey, ~~and~~ New York, and Massachusetts, with sales and service locations ~~around~~in North America, Europe, Japan, and the ~~world.~~Asia Pacific region.

During 2007, management established a profit improvement plan, resulting in a 7.5% reduction in our employment levels, a reduction of discretionary expenses, the realignment of our sales organization to match more closely market and regional opportunities, consolidation of our Corporate headquarters, and the consolidation of certain engineering groups within our Data Storage Process Equipment business, which included the discontinuation of two products. In conjunction with these activities, we recognized a restructuring charge of approximately $6.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2007, as well as an inventory write-off of $4.8 million and an asset impairment charge of $1.1 million. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we incurred additional restructuring charges of $7.0 million and asset impairment charges of $0.3 million, discussed further in Results of Operations below. Through the first nine months of 2008, we have seen the positive impact of these restructuring activities on the Company’s operating expenses.

Highlights of the Third Quarter of ~~2007~~2008

•· Revenue was ~~$97.7~~$115.7 million, ~~a 13% decrease~~an 18% increase over the third quarter of 2007.

· Orders were $90.2 million, down 24% from the third quarter of ~~2006.~~2007.

•· ~~Orders were $118.3 million, an increase of 3% from the third quarter of 2006.~~

•Net loss was ~~$(5.7)~~($1.7) million, or ~~$(0.18)~~($0.05) per share, compared to net ~~income~~loss of ~~$4.5~~($5.7) million, or ~~$0.14~~($0.18) per share, in the third quarter of ~~2006.~~2007.

•· Gross margins were ~~36.7%~~39.8%, compared to ~~42.6%~~36.7% in the third quarter of ~~2006.~~2007.

Highlights of the First Nine Months of ~~2007~~2008

•· Revenue was ~~$295.7~~$332.5 million, a ~~7% decrease from~~12% increase over the comparable 2007 period.

· Orders were $335.9 million, consistent with the comparable 2007 period.

· Net income was $0.9 million, or $0.03 per share, compared to a net loss of ($8.0) million, or ($0.26) per share, in the comparable 2007 period.

· Gross margins were 41.0%, compared to 41.2% in 2007.

Outlook

For the first nine months of ~~2006.~~

•~~Orders were $336.7 million,~~2008, the Company has reported a ~~decrease of 13% from the first nine months of 2006.~~

•~~Net loss was $(8.0) million, or $(0.26) per share, compared to net income of $7.3 million, or $0.23 per share,~~meaningful recovery year in both revenue growth and profitability. While Veeco has delivered strong revenue growth and profit improvement in 2008, in the ~~first nine months~~third quarter we experienced a deterioration in business conditions with a sharp decline in orders of ~~2006.~~

•~~Gross margins were 41.2%, compared to 43.8% in~~MOCVD systems as the ~~first nine months of 2006.~~

Current Business Conditions

~~Veeco reported revenue of $97.7 million for~~HB-LED industry digests the three months ended September 30, 2007, a 13% decrease from the prior year. Veeco expects continued fluctuations in data storage and semiconductor capital expenditure purchases as customers reassess their production ramps and timingsignificant number of new tools purchased this past year, and the global credit crisis caused customers to delay or forego capacity and technology transition plans. Veeco’s revenues were in line with guidance of $92 million to $97 million; however, the Company continued to experience field acceptance delays of new data storage systems. In addition to the challenges in data storage, weakness in Veeco’s semiconductor business also negatively impacted revenue and profitability.

~~Veeco’s orders for the three months ended September 30, 2007 were $118.3 million, an increase of 3% from the $114.8 million reported in the same three-month period of 2006.~~purchases. Third quarter orders inof $90.2 million were significantly below our prior expectations, and the ~~HB-LED/wireless segment remain strong at $43.6 million, up 26% sequentially~~Company also experienced some push-outs and 49% from last year’s third quarter. This increased order rate compared to the prior year reflects positive customer interest in Veeco’s next generation “K-Series” metal organic chemical vapor deposition (“MOCVD”) tools, which were introduced in December 2006 and provide significantcancellations of equipment purchases.

1617

~~advantages in uniformity and throughput to Veeco’s older tools and those~~Table of ~~its competitors. End market demand for this product line remains strong due to emerging LED applications such as PC backlighting and automotive applications.~~ Veeco’s data storage orders decreased 15% sequentially and 22% from last year’s third quarter. While Veeco’s data storage customers are undergoing a period of consolidation and Veeco often has limited visibility to their spending patterns, the Company ~~believes that longer-term~~ industry requirements for increased areal density and consumer electronic expansion will drive future investment in perpendicular head technology and conversion to larger wafer size. The weakest order segment for Veeco during the third quarter was semiconductor, down 22% sequentially and 54% from last year’s third quarter. Veeco is in the process of beta testing its next generation automated AFM product, and currently expects the introduction of this product to help improve Veeco’s semiconductor order and revenue stream in 2008.Contents

~~Technology changes are continuing in all of Veeco’s markets:~~While the continued increase of 80 GB hard drives, the investment in 120 GB hard drives, and the transition to perpendicular recording in data storage; the increased usage of “mini” drives in consumer electronic applications; the reduction of feature sizesCompany has a healthy prospect list for new orders in the ~~semiconductor industry~~fourth quarter, it appears that the global economic climate and constrained financing environment may cause a broad slowdown in capital equipment purchases by our customers, with uncertainty as to ~~45 nanometer~~the depth and ~~below;~~duration of the ~~growing applications in HB-LED such as automotive, architectural lighting,~~downturn. Due to this limited visibility, we are unable to give an accurate assessment of fourth quarter orders, and ~~backlighting~~we currently anticipate order rates to come under pressure for ~~laptops; and emerging opportunities in~~ the ~~solar industry, which utilize Veeco’s existing deposition and metrology technologies.~~foreseeable future. Veeco ~~believes~~estimates that ~~these trends, together with the continued funding of nanoscience research, will prompt customers to seek~~ its next-generation solutions to address their manufacturing and technology challenges. In addition, consumer spending on many types of electronics has increased, and various worldwide economies, such as those in the Asia-Pacific region, are experiencing growth.

~~Outlook~~

The Company reviews a number of indicators to evaluate the strength of its markets going forward, such as plant utilization trends, capacity requirements and capital spending trends. Veeco is currently forecasting an increase in revenues ~~on a sequential basis~~ for the fourth quarter of ~~2007, with expectations for~~ ~~revenues to~~2008 will be ~~in the range of approximately $104 million to $112 million, with bookings of $105 million to $115~~$110-$118 million. Fourth quarter 2007 profitability is forecasted to improve from the weak third quarter levels on improved volume and pricing in both Process Equipment and Metrology. Additionally, management has initiated the first phase of a multi-quarter turn-around plan to improve Veeco’s profitability through a combination of increased focus on its best growth opportunities, gross margin improvement and expense reduction and containment. While Veeco has a strong pipeline of new products for the data storage, HB-LED, semiconductor and scientific research markets, many of these are in the early stages of shipments and there is uncertainty associated with customer acceptance and the Company’s ability to recognize revenue upon shipment of the products. The Company’s current expectations for the fourth quarter, which are subject to uncertainties such as the timing of customer acceptance of shipped products, would bring revenue for the full year to approximately $400 million to $408 million, down approximately 10% from 2006.

The Company ~~anticipates ending~~is taking corrective actions to lower our cost structure in preparation for what is likely to be a reduced revenue year in 2009. Our goal is to lower our spending while maintaining strategic investments in research and development, particularly in our LED & Solar business. It is our intent to emerge from the ~~year with significant backlog, which will set the stage for an improved 2008. This forecast is supported by favorable growth trends specifically~~present economic environment in ~~the HB-LED/wireless market driven by the Company’s unique MOCVD~~a strong position to enable future revenue and MBE technologies and LED applications, as well as early penetration in specific solar applications. The Company also anticipates the positive trend in scientific research to continue due to strong customer acceptance of several new instrumentation products.

~~During the fourth quarter of 2007,~~profit growth. Since the Company ~~engaged in a~~is currently evaluating various cost ~~reduction plan~~cutting actions, it is likely that ~~included a~~ reduction in staff (employees, consultants and temporary workers), a reduction of discretionary expenses, the realignment of the Company’s sales organization to more closely match current market and regional opportunities, and consolidation of certain engineering groups. As a result, during the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company expects to reduce its employment level by approximately 100 employees andVeeco will ~~recognize a restructuring charge of $5.0 million, comprised predominantly of severance costs for the related employees. Additional~~incur restructuring charges in the ~~range of $8.0 million to 13.0 million could potentially impact~~ fourth quarter, ~~2007 and first quarter 2008 earnings,~~ depending upon the timing and extent of ~~additional~~ actions under consideration. ~~Management expects that~~We are not able to estimate the extent of these ~~potential additional~~ charges ~~will not result in a significant outlay of cash~~at this time.

Despite the recent deteriorating business conditions, Veeco has forecasted revenues in the ~~near term.~~range of $440 to $450 million in 2008, up approximately 10% from the $402.5 million reported in 2007, as well as a meaningful profit improvement as compared to 2007. The Company believes that it is well-positioned to capitalize on exciting multi-year technology trends across our LED & Solar, Data Storage and Metrology businesses, and we have made significant progress this year in refocusing our businesses and improving our performance. We have a strong balance sheet and positive cash flow, and we expect at this time that we can manage Veeco through the global economic crisis while maintaining our commitment to R&D to ensure our long-term growth and success.

Veeco will remain focused on executing our core strategies to improve the Company’s performance:

·Directing Veeco’s resources to the best growth opportunities;

·Strengthening the global sales and services organization;

·Maximizing profitability through a continued focus on gross margin improvement and cost containment activities;

· Ensuring that each of Veeco’s product businesses, LED & Solar Process Equipment, Data Storage Process Equipment, and Metrology, are executing well; and

· Improving Veeco’s business processes to maximize effectiveness, predictability and profitability.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations:

Three Months Ended September 30, 20072008 and 20062007

Consistent with prior years, ~~the Company reports~~we report interim quarters, other than fourth quarters, which always end on December 31, on a 13-week basis ending on the last Sunday within such period. The interim quarter ends are determined at the beginning of each year based on the 13-week quarters. The 2008 interim quarter ends are March 30, June 29 and September 28. The 2007 interim quarter ends ~~are~~were April 1, July 1 and September 30. ~~The 2006 interim quarter ends were April 2, July 2, and October 1.~~ For ease of reference, ~~the Company reports~~we report these interim quarter ends as March 31, June 30, and September 30 in ~~its~~our interim condensed consolidated financial statements.

The following ~~tables show the details~~table shows our Consolidated Statements of ~~Veeco’s condensed consolidated statements of operations,~~Operations, percentages of sales, and comparisons between the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended September 30,										Dollar and Percentage
	2008					2007					Change
Net sales	$	115,709		100.0	%	$	97,718		100.0	%	$	17,991		18.4	%
Cost of sales	69,626			60.2		61,824			63.3		7,802			12.6
Gross profit	46,083			39.8		35,894			36.7		10,189			28.4
Operating expenses:
Selling, general, and administrative expense	23,589			20.4		22,723			23.3		866			3.8
Research and development expense	15,302			13.2		15,049			15.4		253			1.7
Amortization expense	3,148			2.7		1,959			2.0		1,189			60.7
Restructuring expense	4,120			3.6		529			0.5		3,591			678.8
Other income, net	(213		)	(0.2	)	(179		)	(0.2	)	34			19.0
Total operating expenses	45,946			39.7		40,081			41.0		5,865			14.6
Operating income (loss)	137			0.1		(4,187		)	(4.3	)	4,324			103.3
Interest expense, net	1,052			0.9		665			0.7		387			58.2
Loss before income taxes and noncontrolling interest	(915		)	(0.8	)	(4,852		)	(5.0	)	(3,937		)	(81.1	)
Income tax provision	812			0.6		954			0.9		(142		)	(14.9	)
Noncontrolling interest	(54		)	(0.0	)	(123		)	(0.1	)	(69		)	(56.1	)
Net loss	$	(1,673	)	(1.4	)%	$	(5,683	)	(5.8	)%	$	4,010		(70.6	)%

Net Sales and ~~2006 and~~Orders

Net sales of $115.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 were up 18.4% compared to the comparable 2007 quarter. The following is an analysis of sales and orders ~~for the same periods~~ by segment ~~industry,~~ and by region ~~(in~~(dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended
September 30,

Dollar
Change

2007

2006

Net sales

$
97,718

100.0
%
$
112,369

100.0
%
$
(14,651
)
Cost of sales

61,824

63.3

64,513

57.4

(2,689
)
Gross profit

35,894

36.7

47,856

42.6

(11,962
)
Operating expenses:

Selling, general and administrative expense

22,723

23.3

22,296

19.9

427

Research and development expense

15,049

15.4

15,716

14.0

(667
)
Amortization expense

1,959

2.0

4,025

3.6

(2,066
)
Write-off of purchased in-process technology

—

—

1,160

1.0

(1,160
)

Restructuring expense

529

0.5

—

—

529

Other income, net

(179
)
(0.2
)
(310
)
(0.3
)
131

Total operating expenses

40,081

41.0

42,887

38.2

(2,806
)
Operating (loss) income

(4,187
)
(4.3
)
4,969

4.4

(9,156
)
Interest expense, net

665

0.7

1,056

0.9

(391
)
(Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest

(4,852
)
(5.0
)
3,913

3.5

(8,765
)
Income tax provision

954

0.9

612

0.5

342

Noncontrolling interest

(123
)
(0.1
)
(1,207
)
(1.0
)
1,084

Net (loss) income

$
(5,683
)
(5.8
)%
$
4,508

4.0
%
$
(10,191
)

	Sales									Orders
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Dollar and Percentage Change					Three Months Ended September 30,				Dollar and Percentage Change					Book-to-Bill Ratio
	2008		2007		Year to Year					2008		2007		Year to Year					2008	2007
Segment Analysis
LED & Solar Process Equipment	$	40,983	$	31,824	$	9,159		28.8	%	$	25,775	$	48,679	$	(22,904	)	(47.1	)%	0.63	1.53
Data Storage Process Equipment	43,256		31,099		12,157			39.1		32,359		32,239		120			0.4		0.75	1.04
Metrology	31,470		34,795		(3,325		)	(9.6	)	32,031		37,399		(5,368		)	(14.4	)	1.02	1.07
Total	$	115,709	$	97,718	$	17,991		18.4	%	$	90,165	$	118,317	$	(28,152	)	(23.8	)%	0.78	1.21
Regional Analysis
North America	$	38,865	$	29,014	$	9,851		34.0	%	$	31,256	$	48,196	$	(16,940	)	(35.1	)%	0.80	1.66
Europe	28,578		18,244		10,334			56.6		22,650		22,220		430			1.9		0.79	1.22
Japan	6,604		12,585		(5,981		)	(47.5	)	7,769		12,330		(4,561		)	(37.0	)	1.18	0.98
Asia Pacific	41,662		37,875		3,787			10.0		28,490		35,571		(7,081		)	(19.9	)	0.68	0.94
Total	$	115,709	$	97,718	$	17,991		18.4	%	$	90,165	$	118,317	$	(28,152	)	(23.8	)%	0.78	1.21

Sales

Orders

Three Months Ended

Dollar and

Three Months Ended

Dollar and

Book to Bill

September 30,

Percentage

September 30

Percentage

Ratio

Change

Change

2007

2006

Year to Year

2007

2006

Year to Year

2007

2006

Segment Analysis

Process Equipment

$
62,923

$
71,375

$
(8,452
)
(11.8
)%
$
80,918

$
74,806

$
6,112

8.2
%
1.29

1.05

Metrology

34,795

40,994

(6,199
)
(15.1
)
37,399

40,042

(2,643
)
(6.6
)
1.08

0.98

Total

$
97,718

$
112,369

$
(14,651
)
(13.0
)%
$
118,317

$
114,848

$
3,469

3.0
%
1.21

1.02

Industry Analysis

Data Storage

$
29,340

$
45,410

$
(16,070
)
(35.4
)%
$
35,207

$
45,345

$
(10,138
)
(22.4
)%
1.20

1.00

HB-LED/wireless

31,495

27,657

3,838

13.9

43,636

29,207

14,429

49.4

1.39

1.06

Semiconductor

11,804

15,978

(4,174
)
(26.1
)
6,489

14,193

(7,704
)
(54.3
)
0.55

0.89

Research and Industrial

25,079

23,324

1,755

7.5

32,985

26,103

6,882

26.4

1.32

1.12

Total

$
97,718

$
112,369

$
(14,651
)
(13.0
)%
$
118,317

$
114,848

$
3,469

3.0
%
1.21

1.02

Regional Analysis (1)

North America

$
29,014

$
41,921

$
(12,907
)
(30.8
)%
$
48,196

$
45,349

$
2,847

6.3
%
1.66

1.08

Europe

18,244

14,882

3,362

22.6

22,220

15,558

6,662

42.8

1.22

1.05

Japan

12,585

7,718

4,867

63.1

12,330

13,226

(896
)
(6.8
)
0.98

1.71

Asia-Pacific

37,875

47,848

(9,973
)
(20.8
)
35,571

40,715

(5,144
)
(12.6
)
0.94

0.85

Total

$
97,718

$
112,369

$
(14,651
)
(13.0
)%
$
118,317

$
114,848

$
3,469

3.0
%
1.21

1.02

~~(1) The prior period has been reclassified~~By segment, LED & Solar Process Equipment sales were up 28.8% due to ~~conform to~~an increase in end user demand from expanding applications for HB-LEDs, strong customer acceptance of Veeco’s newest generation systems, and $5.0 million in sales from the ~~current period presentation.~~solar equipment product line, which was acquired in the second quarter of 2008 as a result of the Mill Lane

1819

Table of Contents

~~Net sales of $97.7 million for the third quarter of 2007 were down $14.7 million, or 13.0%, compared to the third quarter of 2006. By segment,~~acquisition. Additionally, Data Storage Process Equipment sales were ~~down $8.5 million, or 11.8%. The~~up 39.1%, primarily as a result of customers’ technology and capacity requirements. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in ~~Process Equipment~~Metrology sales isof 9.6%, primarily due to a decrease in sales to the data storage market. Partially offsetting this decline was a continued increase in sales to the HB-LED/wireless market. Metrology sales declined $6.2 million, or 15.1%, primarily due to decreased purchases of optical metrology products in the data storage market and automated AFM productsslowdown in the semiconductor ~~market.~~and research and industrial markets. By region, ~~in the third quarter of 2007,~~ net sales increased by ~~63.1%~~34.0%, 56.6% and ~~22.6% in Japan and Europe, respectively, while sales~~10.0% in North America, Europe, and ~~Asia-Pacific declined~~Asia Pacific, respectively, and decreased by ~~30.8% and 20.8%, respectively. The Company believes~~47.5% in Japan. We believe that there will continue to be quarter-to-quarter variations in the geographic distribution of ~~sales will continue.~~sales.

Orders ~~of $118.3 million~~ for the third quarter of ~~2007 represented an increase of $3.5 million, or 3.0%,~~2008 decreased by 23.8% from the comparable ~~2006~~2007 period. By segment, the 8.2% increase in Process Equipment orders was primarily due to a $9.8 million increase in orders for MBE equipment and $9.1 million for MOCVD equipment, driven by the high growth currently being seen in the HB-LED/wireless, solar, and scientific research markets, offset by a47.1% decrease in orders for ~~other process equipment as~~LED & Solar Process Equipment was a result of ~~a decrease in customer demand in~~ the ~~data storage industry.~~HB-LED industry’s slower absorption of the significant number of new MOCVD tools purchased during the past two years. Additionally, the global credit crisis has caused customers to delay or forego capacity and technology purchases. The ~~6.6%~~14.4% decrease in Metrology orders was ~~driven by a 22% decrease in~~due to decreased orders for ~~optical metrology~~AFM products ~~principally~~due to ~~data storage customers.~~lower demand in the semiconductor and research and industrial markets. Data Storage Process Equipment orders remained flat when compared to the 2007 period.

~~The Company’s~~Our book-to-bill ratio for the third quarter of ~~2007,~~2008, which is calculated by dividing orders received in a given time period by revenue recognized in the same time period, was ~~1.21, an increase from the comparable 2006 period.~~0.78 to 1. Our backlog as of September 30, 2008 was $176.0 million, compared to $173.5 million as of December 31, 2007. During the quarter ended September 30, ~~2007, the Company~~2008, we experienced ~~no significant net~~a decrease in backlog ~~adjustments or~~of $9.7 million primarily from order cancellations. ~~However,~~The outlook for orders in the ~~Company did experience rescheduling of order delivery dates~~fourth quarter is uncertain, and it appears that the global economic climate and constrained financing environment may cause a broad slowdown in capital equipment purchases by our customers. Due to these changing business conditions and ~~customer requirements,~~weak capital equipment spending by customers in our business, as well as the ~~Company may continue~~global credit crisis, we expect to experience continued volatility in the form of cancellations and/or ~~rescheduling of~~rescheduled orders.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008, was ~~36.7%~~39.8%, compared to ~~42.6%~~36.7% in the third quarter of ~~2006.~~2007 primarily due to strong performance in Process Equipment sales represented 64.4% of total sales for the third quarter of 2007, up slightly from 63.5% in the prior year period. Metrology sales accounted for 35.6% of total sales for the third quarter of 2007, down from 36.5% in the prior year period.Equipment. Data Storage Process Equipment gross margins ~~decreased to~~increased from 33.5% ~~from 38.1%~~ in the prior-year period to 39.8%, primarily from an increase in sales volume due to increased capacity spending, a favorable product mix and favorable pricing when compared to the prior ~~year~~comparable period, and cost reductions resulting from management’s profit improvement plan, introduced in the fourth quarter of 2007. LED & Solar Process Equipment gross margins increased from 33.4% in the prior-year period to 36.0%, primarily due to an increase in sales volume, as well as a ~~decline in the margin for Ion Beam products resulting from a lower volume of products sold and an unfavorable~~favorable product mix, as compared to the ~~prior year~~prior-year period. The current-year period includes a reduction in gross profit of $0.9 million related to the acquisition of Mill Lane. This ~~decrease~~reduction was the result of purchase accounting, which requires adjustments to capitalize inventory at fair value. This impact is ~~partially offset by an improvement~~reflected in ~~MOCVD product~~cost of sales. Metrology gross margins ~~to 33.6%~~increased from ~~26.9%~~42.6% in the prior year period ~~due~~ to ~~favorable pricing of new products sold~~44.9%, despite a reduction in ~~the current period. Metrology gross margins decreased to 42.6% from 50.3%,~~sales volume, principally due to ~~lower sales volume of optical metrology and automated AFM products and less favorable pricing of and overhead spending on the AFM products sold to scientific and research customers.~~a richer product mix, as well as a reduction in costs.

Operating Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased ~~to $22.7~~by $0.9 million, or ~~23.3%~~3.8%, from the prior-year period primarily due to increased bonus incentives as a result of ~~net~~improved profitability, and an increase in non-cash compensation expense related to stock options and shares of restricted stock. These increases were partially offset by reductions in consulting services and travel and entertainment expense resulting from our cost reduction efforts. As a percentage of sales, selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 23.3% in the third quarter of 2007 ~~compared with $22.3 million, or 19.9% of net sales,~~to 20.4% in the ~~comparable prior year period. The increase is attributable~~ ~~to executive stay and sign-on bonuses and an increase in non-cash stock-based compensation expense, offset by a decrease in sales commissions related to a reduction in domestic sales~~.third quarter of 2008.

Research and development expense ~~totaled $15.0 million in the third quarter of 2007, a decrease of $0.7~~increased $0.3 million from the third quarter of ~~2006,~~2007, primarily due to ~~prior year product development~~research efforts ~~for~~in LED & Solar Process ~~Equipment products that were released during 2007.~~Equipment. As a percentage of sales, research and development ~~increased to~~decreased from 15.4% in the third quarter of 2007 ~~from 14.0%~~to 13.2% in the third quarter of ~~2006.~~2008.

Amortization expense ~~was $2.0~~increased by $1.2 million, or 60.7% from the third quarter of 2007, due primarily to amortization of intangible assets acquired as part of the acquisition of Mill Lane in the second quarter of 2008.

Restructuring expense of $4.1 million in the third quarter of 2008 consisted of $3.7 million associated with the acceleration of equity awards and other severance costs resulting from the mutually agreed upon termination of the employment agreement of our former CEO, as well as $0.4 million for severance and lease-related charges in Metrology. Restructuring expense of $0.5 million in the third quarter of 2007 ~~compared to $4.0 million in the third quarter of 2006. The decrease was principally due to certain technology-based intangibles becoming fully amortized during the second quarter of 2007.~~

During the third quarter of 2006, the Company finalized its purchase accounting for its acquisition of 19.9% of the stock of Fluens Corporation (“Fluens”), determining that Fluens is a variable interest entity and the Company is its primary beneficiary as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Financial Interpretation (“FIN”) 46R, ~~Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (revised December 2003)—an interpretation of ARB No. 51.~~ ~~As such, the Company has consolidated the results of Fluens’ operations from the acquisition date, and has attributed~~

the 80.1% portion that is not owned by Veeco to noncontrolling interest in the Company’s consolidated financial statements (see below). As part of this acquisition accounting, the Company recorded $1.2 million of in-process technology, which was written off during the third quarter of 2006. No such costs were recorded during the third quarter of 2007.

~~The restructuring expense of $0.5 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2007,~~ consisted of personnel severance costs incurred ~~throughout the Company.~~across all divisions.

Table of Contents

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense in the third quarter of ~~2007~~2008 was ~~$0.7~~$1.1 million, compared to ~~$1.1~~$0.7 million in the third quarter of ~~2006. This reduction~~2007. The increase in net interest expense is ~~the result of less net debt outstanding~~due to a reduction in interest income resulting primarily from lower interest rates during the current period.

~~The income~~Income Taxes

Income tax provision for the quarter ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008 was ~~$1.0~~$0.8 million, compared to ~~$0.6~~$1.0 million in the third quarter of ~~2006.~~2007. The 2008 provision for income taxes included $0.5 million relating to our foreign operations which continue to be profitable, and $0.3 million relating to our domestic operations. The 2007 provision for income taxes included $0.6 million relating to Veeco’s foreign operations, which continue to be profitable, and $0.4 million relating to the Company’s domestic operations. Due to significant domestic net operating loss carry forwards, which are fully reserved by a valuation allowance, Veeco’s domestic operations are not expected to incur significant income taxes for the foreseeable future. The 2006 provision for income taxes included $0.2 million relating to Veeco’sour foreign operations and $0.4 million relating to ~~the Company’s~~our domestic ~~operations. The increase to the income tax provision is due to an increase in taxable income relating to the Company’s foreign~~ operations.

Noncontrolling interest was a credit to income of $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007, and a credit of $1.2 million for the comparable period in the prior year. As the Company is the primary beneficiary of Fluens, a variable interest entity, it is required to consolidate Fluens and eliminate the portion of its results attributable to noncontrolling interests. As a result, the Company eliminates from its net income 80.1% of Fluens’ operating losses. The credit in the prior comparable period includes the elimination of 80.1% of the write-off of in-process technology recorded in the 2006 third quarter.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 20072008 and 20062007

The following ~~tables show the details~~table shows our Consolidated Statements of ~~Veeco’s condensed consolidated statements of operations,~~Operations, percentages of sales, and comparisons between the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 ~~and 2006 and the analysis of sales and orders for the same periods by segment, industry and region (in~~(dollars in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,										Dollar Change
	2007					2006								Nine Months Ended September 30,										Dollar and Percentage
														2008					2007					Change
Net sales	$	295,653		100.0	%	$	317,922		100.0	%	$	(22,269	)	$	332,465		100.0	%	$	295,653		100.0	%	$	36,812		12.5	%
Cost of sales	173,819			58.8		178,585			56.2		(4,766		)	196,026			59.0		173,819			58.8		22,207			12.8
Gross profit	121,834			41.2		139,337			43.8		(17,503		)	136,439			41.0		121,834			41.2		14,605			12.0
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative expense	69,347			23.4		68,622			21.5		725
Selling, general, and administrative expense														70,528			21.2		69,347			23.4		1,181			1.7
Research and development expense	46,341			15.7		45,554			14.3		787			45,173			13.6		46,341			15.7		(1,168		)	(2.5	)
Amortization expense	8,236			2.8		12,029			3.8		(3,793		)	7,530			2.3		8,236			2.8		(706		)	(8.6	)
Restructuring expense	1,974			0.7		—			—		1,974			6,995			2.1		1,974			0.7		5,021			254.4
Write-off of purchased in-process technology	—			—		1,160			0.4		(1,160		)
Asset impairment charge														285			0.1		—			0.0		285			100.0
Other income, net	(605		)	(0.2	)	(243		)	(0.0	)	(362		)	(591		)	(0.2	)	(605		)	(0.2	)	(14		)	(2.3	)
Total operating expenses	125,293			42.4		127,122			40.0		(1,829		)	129,920			39.1		125,293			42.4		4,627			3.7
Operating income	(3,459		)	(1.2	)	12,215			3.8		(15,674		)
Operating income (loss)														6,519			1.9		(3,459		)	(1.2	)	9,978			288.5
Interest expense, net	2,256			0.7		3,583			1.1		(1,327		)	2,913			0.8		2,256			0.7		657			29.1
Gain on extinguishment of debt	(738		)	(0.2	)	(330		)	(0.1	)	(408		)	—			0.0		(738		)	(0.2	)	(738		)	(100.0	)
(Loss) income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest	(4,977		)	(1.7	)	8,962			2.8		(13,939
	(4,977		)	(1.7	)	8,962			2.8		(13,939		)
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest														3,606			1.1		(4,977		)	(1.7	)	8,583			172.5
Income tax provision	3,490			1.2		2,878			0.9		612			2,860			0.9		3,490			1.2		(630		)	(18.1	)
Noncontrolling interest	(482		)	(0.2	)	(1,207		)	(0.4	)	725			(200		)	(0.1	)	(482		)	(0.2	)	(282		)	(58.5	)
Net (loss) income	$	(7,985	)	(2.7	)%	$	7,291		2.3	%	$	(15,276	)

Net income (loss)														$	946		0.3	%	$	(7,985	)	(2.7	)%	$	8,931		111.8	%

Sales

Orders

Nine Months Ended

Dollar and

Nine Months Ended

Dollar and

Book to Bill

September 30,

Percentage

September 30,

Percentage

Ratio

Change

Change

2007

2006

Year to Year

2007

2006

Year to Year

2007

2006

Segment Analysis

Process Equipment

$
181,028

$
191,927

$
(10,899
)
(5.7
)%
$
227,285

$
252,608

$
(25,323
)
(10.0
)%
1.26

1.32

Metrology

114,625

125,995

(11,370
)
(9.0
)
109,392

132,142

(22,750
)
(17.2
)
0.95

1.05

Total

$
295,653

$
317,922

$
(22,269
)
(7.0
)%
$
336,677

$
384,750

$
(48,073
)
(12.5
)%
1.14

1.21

Industry Analysis

Data Storage

$
96,006

$
138,598

$
(42,592
)
(30.7
)%
$
105,944

$
187,177

$
(81,233
)
(43.4
)%
1.10

1.35

HB-LED/wireless

78,240

61,177

17,063

27.9

117,008

80,939

36,069

44.6

1.50

1.32

Semiconductor

32,755

39,735

(6,980
)
(17.6
)
26,562

44,288

(17,726
)
(40.0
)
0.81

1.11

Research and Industrial

88,652

78,412

10,240

13.1

87,163

72,346

14,817

20.5

0.98

0.92

Total

$
295,653

$
317,922

$
(22,269
)
(7.0
)%
$
336,677

$
384,750

$
(48,073
)
(12.5
)%
1.14

1.21

Regional Analysis (1)

North America

$
95,516

$
109,180

$
(13,664
)
(12.5
)%
$
121,696

$
138,251

$
(16,555
)
(12.0
)%
1.27

1.27

Europe

53,199

49,332

3,867

7.8

63,396

42,374

21,022

49.6

1.19

0.86

Japan

43,732

34,016

9,716

28.6

42,125

44,400

(2,275
)
(5.1
)
0.96

1.31

Asia-Pacific

103,206

125,394

(22,188
)
(17.7
)
109,460

159,725

(50,265
)
(31.5
)
1.06

1.27

Total

$
295,653

$
317,922

$
(22,269
)
(7.0
)%
$
336,677

$
384,750

$
(48,073
)
(12.5
)%
1.14

1.21

~~(1) The prior period has been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.~~Net Sales and Orders

Net sales of ~~$295.7~~$332.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008 were ~~down $22.3 million, or 7.0%,~~up 12.5% compared to the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2006.~~ comparable 2007 period. The following is an analysis of sales and orders by segment and by region (dollars in thousands):

	Sales									Orders
	Nine Months Ended September 30,				Dollar and Percentage Change					Nine Months Ended September 30,				Dollar and Percentage Change					Book-to-Bill Ratio
	2008		2007		Year to Year					2008		2007		Year to Year					2008	2007
Segment Analysis
LED & Solar Process Equipment	$	128,205	$	82,188	$	46,017		56.0	%	$	116,513	$	121,448	$	(4,935	)	(4.1	)%	0.91	1.48
Data Storage Process Equipment	104,096		98,840		5,256			5.3		124,685		105,837		18,848			17.8		1.20	1.07
Metrology	100,164		114,625		(14,461		)	(12.6	)	94,738		109,392		(14,654		)	(13.4	)	0.95	0.95
Total	$	332,465	$	295,653	$	36,812		12.5	%	$	335,936	$	336,677	$	(741	)	(0.2	)%	1.01	1.14

Regional Analysis
North America	$	116,631	$	95,516	$	21,115		22.1	%	$	124,666	$	121,696	$	2,970		2.4	%	1.07	1.27
Europe	69,607		53,199		16,408			30.8		57,664		63,396		(5,732		)	(9.0	)	0.83	1.19
Japan	29,347		43,732		(14,385		)	(32.9	)	24,548		42,125		(17,577		)	(41.7	)	0.84	0.96
Asia Pacific	116,880		103,206		13,674			13.2		129,058		109,460		19,598			17.9		1.10	1.06
Total	$	332,465	$	295,653	$	36,812		12.5	%	$	335,936	$	336,677	$	(741	)	(0.2	)%	1.01	1.14

Table of Contents

By segment, LED & Solar Process Equipment sales were ~~down $10.9 million, or 5.7%. The decrease~~up 56.0% due to an increase in end user demand from expanding applications for HB-LEDs, as well as strong customer acceptance of Veeco’s newest generation systems. Additionally, Data Storage Process Equipment sales isincreased by 5.3% due to customers’ technology and capacity requirements. This was partially offset by a decrease in Metrology sales of 12.6%, primarily due to a decrease in sales to customers in the data storage industry. Partially offsetting this decline was an increase in sales to the HB-LED/wireless market. Metrology sales decreased $11.4 million, or 9.0%, primarily due to decreased purchases of optical metrology products in the data storage market and automated AFM productsslowdown in the semiconductor ~~market.~~and research and industrial markets. By region, ~~in the nine months ended September 30, 2007,~~ net sales increased by ~~28.6%~~22.1%, 30.8% and 13.2% in ~~Japan and 7.8% in Europe, while sales in Asia-Pacific and~~ North America, ~~declined 17.7%~~Europe, and ~~12.5%, respectively. The Company believes~~Asia Pacific, respectively, and decreased by 32.9% in Japan. We believe that there will continue to be ~~period-to-period~~quarter-to-quarter variations in the geographic distribution of sales.

Orders ~~of $336.7 million~~ for the ~~nine months~~nine-month period ended September 30, ~~2007 represented a decrease of $48.1 million, or 12.5%, from~~2008 were essentially flat with the comparable ~~2006~~2007 period. By segment, the 10.0% decrease in Process Equipment orders was primarily due to a $49.5 million decrease in orders for Ion Beam equipment as a result of a decrease in customer demand in the data storage industry, partially offset by a $30.8 million increase in MOCVD orders resulting from an increase in purchases in the HB-LED/wireless market. The 17.2%13.4% decrease in Metrology orders was ~~primarily~~ due to ~~a $13.5 million~~decreased orders for AFM products resulting from lower demand in the semiconductor, research, and industrial markets. The 4.1% decrease in orders for ~~optical metrology~~LED & Solar Process Equipment was due primarily to the third quarter 2008 decline in MOCVD orders as the HB-LED industry absorbs the significant number of new MOCVD tools purchased in the past two years. These decreases are principally offset by a 17.8% increase in Data Storage Process Equipment orders, primarily for slicing and dicing products ~~principally~~used to ~~data storage customers, and a $10.8 million decrease in orders for automated AFM products, principally to semiconductor customers.~~create TFMHs.

~~The Company’s~~Our book-to-bill ratio for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007, which is calculated by dividing orders received in a given time period by revenue recognized in the same time period,~~2008 was ~~1.14, a decrease from the comparable 2006 period. The Company’s~~ 1.01 to 1. Our backlog as of September 30, ~~2007~~2008 was ~~$181.6~~$176.0 million, compared to ~~$140.8~~$173.5 million as of December 31, ~~2006.~~ 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007,~~2008, we experienced an increase in backlog of $12.7 million due to the ~~Company did not experience significant net backlog adjustments or~~acquisition of Mill Lane, offset by order ~~cancellations. However,~~cancellations of $13.7 million. The outlook for orders in the ~~Company did experience rescheduling of order delivery dates~~fourth quarter is uncertain, and it appears that the global economic climate and constrained financing environment may cause a broad slowdown in capital equipment purchases by our customers. Due to these changing business conditions and ~~customer requirements,~~weak capital equipment spending by customers in our businesses, as well as the ~~Company may continue~~global credit crisis, we expect to experience continued volatility in the form of cancellations and/or ~~rescheduling of~~rescheduled orders.

Gross Profit

Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008, was ~~41.2%~~41.0%, compared to ~~43.8%~~41.2% in the comparable ~~prior year~~2007 period. Strong performance in Process Equipment sales represented 61.2% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, up from 60.4% in the prior year period. Metrology sales accounted for 38.8% of total sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, down from 39.6% in the comparable prior year period. Process Equipment gross margin was consistent with the prior year period. However, included in the margin was a significant improvement in MOCVD product gross margins from 23.0% in the prior year to 37.2% in the current year due primarily to an increase in sales volume was offset primarily by unfavorable sales volume in Metrology. LED & Solar Process Equipment gross margins increased from 37.0% in the prior-year period to 39.6%, primarily due to a significant overall increase in sales volume as compared to the prior-year period as well as favorable pricing on new MOCVD products and a ~~significant improvement~~favorable product mix in ~~mix and price.~~MBE products. The current-year period includes a reduction in gross profit of $0.9 million related to the acquisition of Mill Lane. The reduction was the result of purchase accounting, which requires adjustments to capitalize inventory at fair value. This ~~was offset by a decrease~~impact is reflected in cost of sales. Data Storage Process Equipment gross margins decreased from 39.5% in the ~~margin for Ion Beam products from 46.9%~~prior-year period to 38.9%, due to favorable warranty and pricing in the ~~2006 period to 41.2% in the current comparable period due to an unfavorable product mix, as well as the decrease in sales to customers in the data storage market.~~prior-year period. Metrology gross margins decreased from 45.6% in the prior-year period to ~~45.6% from~~

~~51.4%~~45.2%, principally due to ~~less favorable product mix in AFM products sold to scientific and research customers and~~ lower sales volume ~~of automated AFM~~offset by a reduction in spending and ~~optical metrology products.~~favorable product mix.

Operating Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses ~~were $69.3~~increased by $1.2 million, or ~~23.4%~~1.7%, from the prior-year period primarily due to increased bonus incentives and profit sharing as a result of ~~sales, in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared with $68.6 million, or 21.5% of sales, in the comparable prior year period. The $0.7 million increase is primarily attributable~~ to better profitability performance, as well as an increase in non-cash compensation expense related to stock options and shares of restricted ~~shares and an increase in selling expense due primarily to an investment in the AFM product line for life sciences applications.~~stock. This iswas partially offset by ~~a reduction~~reductions in ~~management incentive bonus~~travel and entertainment expense and ~~legal fees, as well as reduced~~ consulting services associated with our cost reduction initiatives. As a percentage of sales, ~~commissions related~~selling, general and administrative expenses decreased from 23.4% in 2007 to ~~the reduction~~21.2% in ~~domestic sales~~.2008.

Research and development expense ~~totaled $46.3 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, an increase of $0.8~~decreased $1.2 million from the comparable ~~prior year~~2007 period, ~~driven by an investment in life sciences applications in AFM as well as new~~primarily due to a more focused approach to data storage product development ~~efforts~~as a result of the decision made in the ~~Company’s MOCVD~~fourth quarter of 2007 by management to discontinue two product ~~platform for HB-LED/wireless applications~~lines and ~~automated AFM products for~~consolidate facilities to better reflect the ~~semiconductor industry. This is partially offset by a decrease in research~~ volume of business

Table of Contents

and ~~development expense in Ion Beam products from the prior comparable period, due to the release of these products during 2007.~~industry growth rates. As a percentage of sales, research and development ~~expense increased to~~decreased from 15.7% in 2007 to 13.6% in 2008.

Amortization expense was $7.5 million in the 2008 period, compared to $8.2 million in 2007. The decrease was the result of certain technology-based intangible assets becoming fully amortized, offset by the amortization in the current period of intangibles acquired as part of the acquisition of Mill Lane.

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007, from 14.3% in the comparable prior year period.~~

Amortization expense was $8.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2007, compared to $12.0 million in the comparable prior year period. The decrease was due to certain technology-based intangibles becoming fully amortized during the second quarter2008, we recorded restructuring charges of ~~2007.~~

The restructuring expense of $2.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, consisted of personnel severance costs incurred throughout the Company during the second and third quarters of 2007.

During the third quarter of 2006, the Company finalized its purchase accounting for its acquisition of 19.9% of the stock of Fluens determining that Fluens is a variable interest entity and the Company is its primary beneficiary. As such, the Company has consolidated the results of Fluens’ operations from the acquisition date, and has attributed the 80.1% portion that is not owned by Veeco to noncontrolling interest in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As part of this acquisition accounting, the Company recorded $1.2$7.0 million, of ~~in-process technology,~~ which $4.1 million was ~~written off~~incurred during the third quarter of ~~2006.~~2008 and $2.9 million was incurred during the first quarter of 2008. The third quarter restructuring charge consists of $3.7 million associated with the acceleration of equity awards and other severance costs resulting from the mutually agreed upon termination of the employment agreement of our former CEO, as well as $0.4 million for severance and lease-related charges in Metrology. The first quarter restructuring charge consisted of $2.6 million of costs associated with the consolidation and relocation of our Corporate headquarters and $0.3 million of personnel severance costs. Restructuring expense in 2007 of $2.0 million consisted of personnel severance costs.

An asset impairment charge of $0.3 million was taken during 2008 primarily for leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures abandoned in connection with the consolidation and relocation of our Corporate headquarters into our Plainview, New York facility during the first quarter. No ~~such costs were recorded during 2007.~~similar expense was incurred in the prior-year period.

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense in the ~~nine months~~nine-month period ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008 was ~~$2.3~~$2.9 million, compared to ~~$3.6~~$2.3 million in the comparable ~~prior year~~2007 period. This ~~reduction~~increase in net interest expense ~~is the result~~was due to a reduction in interest income resulting from lower interest rates.

Gain on Extinguishment of ~~less net debt outstanding during the period.~~Debt

During the ~~nine months ended September 30,~~first quarter of 2007, ~~the Company~~we repurchased $56.0 million of ~~its~~our convertible subordinated notes, reducing the amount outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 million. The repurchase amount was $55.1 million in cash, of which $54.8 million related to principal and $0.3 million related to accrued interest. As a result of ~~the repurchase,~~these repurchases, ~~the Company~~we recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt in the amount of $0.7 ~~million. In the comparable 2006 period, the Company repurchased $20.0~~ million of its convertible subordinated notes reducing the amount outstanding from $220.0 million to $200.0 million. As a result of these repurchases, the Company recorded a net gain from the extinguishment of debt in ~~the amount of $0.3 million.~~2007.

~~The income~~Income Taxes

Income tax provision for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008 was ~~$3.5~~$2.9 million compared to ~~$2.9~~$3.5 million in the comparable ~~prior year period.~~prior-year period, primarily as a result of a $0.4 million decrease in the reserve relating to foreign unrecognized tax benefits as required by FASB Interpretation Number 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (“FIN 48”). The ~~2007~~2008 provision for income taxes included ~~$2.5~~$1.9 million relating to ~~Veeco’s~~our foreign operations which continue to be profitable, and $1.0 million relating to ~~the Company’s~~our domestic operations. Due to significant domestic net operating loss carry forwards, which are fully reserved by a valuation allowance, Veeco’s domestic operations are not expected to incur significant income taxes for the foreseeable future. The ~~2006~~2007 provision for income taxes included ~~$1.9~~$2.5 million relating to ~~Veeco’s~~our foreign operations and $1.0 million relating to ~~the Company’s~~our domestic operations.

Noncontrolling interest was a credit to income of $0.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 and a credit of $1.2 million in the comparable prior year period. As the Company is the primary beneficiary of Fluens, a variable interest entity, it is required to consolidate Fluens and eliminate the portion of its results attributable to noncontrolling interests. As a result, the Company eliminates from its net income 80.1% of Fluens’ operating losses. The credit in the prior comparable period includes the elimination of 80.1% of the write-off of in-process technology recorded in the 2006 third quarter.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Historically, ~~Veeco’s~~our principal capital requirements have included the funding of acquisitions and capital expenditures. ~~The Company~~We traditionally ~~has~~have generated cash from operations and debt and stock issuances. ~~Veeco’s~~Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations is dependent on the continued demand for ~~the Company’s~~our products and services. A summary of the ~~current period~~ cash flow activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 is as follows (in thousands):

	Nine Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2007			2006			2008			2007
Net (loss) income	$	(7,985	)	$	7,291

Net cash provided by operating activities	$	22,777		$	22,524		$	22,420		$	22,777
Net cash used in investing activities	(6,543		)	(15,634		)	(21,296		)	(6,543		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(54,443		)	(4,598		)	(558		)	(54,443		)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents	(435		)	(226		)	35			(435		)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(38,644		)	2,066			601			(38,644		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	147,046			124,499			117,083			147,046
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	108,402		$	126,565		$	117,684		$	108,402

~~The Company~~23

Table of Contents

We had a net ~~decrease~~increase in cash of ~~$38.6~~$0.6 million ~~for~~during the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007 from December 31, 2006, primarily due to the repurchase of $56.0 million of its 4.125% convertible subordinated notes due 2008 (the “Old Notes”).~~2008. Cash provided by operations was ~~$22.8~~$22.4 million for this period, as compared to ~~cash provided by operations of $22.5~~$22.8 million for the comparable ~~2006~~2007 period. Net ~~(loss)~~ income adjusted for non-cash items provided operating cash flows of ~~$14.6~~$29.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007, compared to $31.0 million for the comparable 2006 period.~~2008. Net cash provided by operations for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008 was ~~favorably~~negatively impacted by a ~~decrease~~net change in net operating assets and liabilities of ~~$8.2~~$6.6 million. ~~Accounts~~This was driven by a decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $9.6 million and an increase of $2.0 million in capitalized patent costs, partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable ~~decreased $20.0~~of $6.6 million. Due to the current global economic crisis, we cannot assure timely receipts of accounts receivable, due to cash constraints on our customers. As of September 30, 2008, we are not aware of any specific uncollectible accounts resulting from the current economic uncertainties and believe that related reserves are adequate to cover the uncertainties that exist.

Cash used in investing activities of $21.3 million ~~during~~for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2007, due to a $25.4~~2008 resulted from the acquisition of Mill Lane, net of cash acquired, for $11.0 million, ~~reduction in sales when comparing~~as well as capital expenditures of $10.4 million. During the fourth quarter of ~~2006~~2008, we expect to ~~the third quarter~~invest an estimated additional $4.2 million in capital projects primarily related to engineering equipment and lab tools used in producing, testing and process development of ~~2007,~~our products and favorable cash collections during 2007. Inventories increased by approximately $4.8 million during the same period, principally due to an increase in work in process and finished goods inventories for systems to be shipped during the fourth quarter of 2007 and the first quarter of 2008 in the Process Equipment segment. Accounts payable decreased $5.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, due to the timing of payments.

enhanced manufacturing facilities. Cash used in investing activities of $6.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 ~~was driven by~~resulted primarily from capital expenditures of $6.8 million, partially offset by $0.3 million in proceeds from the sale of property, plant, and equipment. ~~During~~

Cash used in financing activities for the ~~fourth quarter of 2007, the Company expects to invest an additional $5.3~~nine months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $0.6 million, resulting from $1.0 million in ~~capital equipment primarily related to engineering equipment~~restricted stock tax withholdings and ~~lab tools used~~$0.3 million in ~~enhancing, testing and process development~~mortgage payments, offset by proceeds of ~~Veeco’s products.~~

$0.7 million from common stock issuances resulting from stock option exercises. Cash used in financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 totaled $54.4 million, primarily consisting of $55.4 million used to repurchase a portion of ~~the Company’s Old Notes and pay down other existing long-term debt~~our outstanding convertible subordinated notes (discussed below) and $1.5 million in payments for debt issuance costs, partially offset by $2.8 million from the issuance of common stock resulting from the exercise of employee stock options. ~~The debt~~

During the first quarter of 2007, we repurchased $56.0 million of our 4.125% convertible subordinated notes ~~repurchase~~due 2008 (the “Old Notes”), for $55.1 million (including accrued interest) in cash which reduced the amount of Old Notes outstanding from $200.0 million to $144.0 ~~million and the Company~~million. As a result of these repurchases, we recorded a net gain of $0.7 million. We may engage in similar transactions in the future depending on market conditions, our cash position and other factors.

~~In April and May~~During the second quarter of 2007, ~~the Company~~we issued new convertible subordinated notes due 2012 (the “New Notes”) pursuant to privately negotiated exchange agreements with certain holders of the Old Notes. Under these agreements, such holders agreed to exchange $118.8 million aggregate principal amount of the Old Notes for approximately $117.8 million aggregate principal amount of ~~a new series of 4.125% convertible subordinated notes~~New Notes due April 15, ~~2012 (the "New Notes"). Following the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2 million of the Old Notes, with a conversion price of $38.51 per common share, remained outstanding.~~2012. No net gain or loss was recorded on the exchange transactions since the carrying value of the Old Notes including unamortized deferred financing costs approximated the exchange value of the New Notes. Following the exchange transactions, approximately $25.2 million of the Old Notes remained outstanding and are due in December 2008. We expect to pay off these Old Notes through the use of our available cash balances.

The New Notes initially ~~will be~~ are convertible into 36.7277 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of New Notes ~~(equivalent to~~at a conversion price of $27.23 ~~per share or a premium of 38% over the closing market price for Veeco's common stock on April 16, 2007). Holders may convert the New Notes~~ at any time during the period beginning on January 15, 2012 through the close of business on the second day prior to April 15, 2012 and

earlier upon the occurrence of certain ~~events including Veeco's common stock trading at prices 130% over~~events. We pay interest on the ~~conversion price for a specified period.~~New Notes on April 20 and October 15 of each year.

During the third quarter of 2007, ~~the Company~~we entered into athe Credit Agreement with ~~HSBC.~~HSBC Bank, as administrative agent. The ~~New Credit Agreement amends and restates, and effectively replaces, the Prior Credit Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2005, with HSBC, which was set to expire on March 15, 2008. The New~~ Credit Agreement provides for ~~revolving credit~~ borrowings of up to $100.0 ~~million.~~ ~~The~~million with an annual interest rate ~~under the New Credit Agreement~~that is a floating rate equal to the prime rate of the agent bank. A LIBOR-based interest rate option is also provided. Borrowings may be used for general corporate purposes, including working capital requirements and acquisitions. The ~~New~~ Credit Agreement contains certain restrictive covenants, substantially similar to those of the Prior Credit Agreement. These include limitations with respect to the incurrence of indebtedness, the payment of dividends, long-term leases, investments, mergers, acquisitions, consolidations and ~~sales of assets. The Company is~~we are required to satisfy certain financial tests under the ~~new Credit Agreement substantially similar to those of the prior~~ Credit Agreement. As of September 30, 2008, we are in compliance with all covenants. Substantially all of ~~the~~our domestic assets, ~~of the Company and its material domestic subsidiaries,~~ other than real estate, have been pledged to secure ~~the Company’s~~our obligations under the New Credit Agreement. The revolving credit facility

Table of Contents

under the New Credit Agreement expires on March 31, 2012. As of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, there were no borrowings ~~outstanding~~or unsecured letters of credit outstanding. Since borrowing availability under the ~~New~~Credit Agreement is based upon earnings, the anticipated business downturn may have an impact on our borrowing availability and could potentially result in noncompliance with the restrictive covenants required by the Credit Agreement.

~~The Company believes~~We believe that existing cash balances together with cash generated from operations and amounts available under the Credit Agreement ~~Company’s new revolving credit facility~~ will be sufficient to meet ~~the Company’s~~our projected working capital and other cash flow requirements for the next twelve months, as well as ~~the Company’s~~our contractual ~~obligations, over the next two years. The Company believes it~~obligations. We believe we will be able to meet ~~its~~our obligation to repay the ~~outstanding~~ $25.2 million ~~of the~~outstanding Old Notes that mature on December 21, 2008 through the use of available cash, and to repay the $117.8 million outstanding New Notes that mature on ~~hand and~~April 15, 2012 through a combination of conversion of the notes outstanding, refinancing, cash generated from ~~operations. The Company believes it~~operations, and other means.

During the second quarter of 2008, we acquired Mill Lane for $11.0 million, net of cash acquired, plus potential future earn-out payments of up to $19.0 million, contingent upon the future achievement of certain operating performance criteria. As of September 30, 2008, we have accrued $3.5 million in earn-out payments due to revenues earned through the end of the third quarter of 2008, and we anticipate accruing approximately $6.1 million during the fourth quarter of 2008. Payment for these earn-outs will be made in the first quarter of 2009. We believe we will be able to meet ~~its~~our obligation to ~~repay~~pay these earn-out amounts to Mill Lane from the ~~outstanding $117.8 million of the New Notes due in April 2012 through a combination of refinancing, cash generated from operations and/or other means.~~sources referred to above.

In 2006, ~~Veeco purchased~~we invested $0.5 million to purchase 19.9% of the common stock of ~~Fluens.~~Fluens Corporation (“Fluens”), of which 31% is owned by one of our Senior Vice Presidents. Veeco and Fluens ~~are~~have jointly ~~developing~~developed a next-generation process for high-rate deposition of aluminum oxide for data storage applications. If this development is successful and upon the satisfaction of certain additional conditions by May 2009, ~~Veeco~~we will be obligated to purchase the balance of the outstanding stock of Fluens for $3.5 million ~~and pay~~plus an ~~earn-out. Approximately 31% of Fluens is owned by a Vice President of one of Veeco’s business units.~~

~~During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company expects~~earn-out payment to ~~recognize $5.0 million of severance charges~~ ~~related to a cost reduction plan. Of this total amount, approximately $1.4 million will be paid out during the fourth quarter of 2007, with the remainder paid out over the next twelve months.~~Fluens’ stockholders based on future performance.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

General: ~~Veeco’s~~ Our discussion and analysis of ~~its~~our financial condition and results of operations are based upon ~~the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements,~~our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with ~~accounting principles~~U.S. generally accepted ~~in the United States.~~accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires ~~Veeco~~us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments, including those related to bad debts, inventories, intangible assets and other long-lived assets, income taxes, warranty obligations, restructuring costs and contingent liabilities, including potential litigation. Management bases its estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. ~~The Company considers~~We consider certain accounting policies related to revenue recognition, the valuation of inventories, the impairment of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets, the impairment of long-lived assets, warranty costs, the accounting for income taxes, and share-based compensation to be critical policies due to the estimation processes involved in each.

Revenue Recognition: ~~The Company recognizes~~ We recognize revenue in accordance with the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”)~~SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin ~~(“SAB”)~~ No. 104, Revenue Recognition. Certain of our product sales are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements in accordance with Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 00-21, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables. A multiple-element arrangement is a transaction which may involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services, or rights to use assets, and performance may occur at different points in time or over different periods of time. ~~The Company recognizes~~We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the sales price is fixed or determinable and ~~collectibility~~collectability is reasonably assured.

For products ~~manufactured~~produced according to ~~the Company's~~our published specifications, where no installation is required or installation is deemed perfunctory and no substantive customer acceptance provisions exist, revenue is recognized when title passes to the customer, generally upon shipment. For products produced according to a particular ~~customer's~~customer’s specifications, revenue is recognized when the product has been tested, it has been demonstrated that it meets the ~~customer's~~customer’s specifications and title passes to the customer. The amount of revenue recorded is reduced by the amount of any customer retention (generally 10% to 20%), which is not payable by the customer until installation is completed and final customer acceptance is achieved. Installation is not deemed to be essential to the functionality of the equipment

since installation does not involve significant changes to the features or capabilities of the equipment or building complex interfaces and connections. In addition, the equipment could be installed by the customer or other vendors and generally the cost of installation approximates only 1% to 2% of the sales value of the related equipment.

For new products, new applications of existing

Table of Contents

products, or for products with substantive customer acceptance provisions where performance cannot be fully assessed prior to meeting customer specifications at the customer site, revenue is recognized upon completion of installation and receipt of final customer acceptance. Since title to goods generally passes to the customer upon shipment and 80% to 90% of the contract amount becomes payable at that time, inventory is relieved and accounts receivable is recorded for the amount billed at the time of shipment. The profit on the amount billed for these transactions is deferred and recorded as deferred profit in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance ~~sheets. At September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, $1.3 million and $0.3 million, respectively, are recorded in deferred profit.~~

sheets. Service and maintenance contract revenues are recorded as deferred revenue, which is included in other accrued expenses, and recognized as revenue on a straight-line basis over the service period of the related contract.

Inventory Valuation: Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (principally first-in, first-out method) or market. Management evaluates the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory on a quarterly basis. ~~The Company's~~Our policy is to assess the valuation of all inventories, including raw materials, work-in-process, finished goods and spare parts. Obsolete inventory or inventory in excess of ~~management's~~management’s estimated usage for the next 12 ~~month's~~month’s requirements is written down to its estimated market value, if less than its cost. Inherent in the estimates of market value are ~~management's~~management’s estimates related to ~~Veeco's~~our future manufacturing schedules, customer demand, technological and/or market obsolescence, possible alternative uses and ultimate realization of excess inventory.

Goodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Asset Impairment: ~~The Company has~~ We have significant intangible assets related to goodwill and other acquired intangibles. In assessing the recoverability of ~~the Company's~~our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, ~~the Company~~we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the respective assets. If it is determined that impairment indicators are present and that the assets will not be fully recoverable, their carrying values are reduced to estimated fair value. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, an historic or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments, and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there are identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. Changes in strategy and/or market conditions could significantly impact these assumptions, and thus Veeco may be required to record impairment charges for those assets not previously ~~recorded~~.recorded. During the fourth quarter of 2007, as required, we performed an annual impairment test, and based upon the judgment of management, it was determined that no impairment exists. Management continues to believe that there are no impairment indicators at the current time.

Long-Lived Asset Impairment: The carrying values of long-lived assets are periodically reviewed to determine if any impairment indicators are present. If it is determined that such indicators are present and the review indicates that the assets will not be fully recoverable, based on undiscounted estimated cash flows over the remaining amortization or depreciation period, ~~their~~the carrying values of such assets are reduced to estimated fair value. Impairment indicators include, among other conditions, cash flow deficits, an historic or anticipated decline in revenue or operating profit, adverse legal or regulatory developments, and a material decrease in the fair value of some or all of the assets. Assets are grouped at the lowest level for which there is identifiable cash flows that are largely independent of the cash flows generated by other asset groups. Assumptions utilized by management in reviewing for impairment of long-lived assets could be effected by changes in strategy and/or market conditions which may require ~~Veeco~~us to record additional impairment charges for these assets, as well as impairment charges on other long-lived assets not previously recorded.

Warranty Costs: ~~The Company estimates~~ We estimate the costs that may be incurred under the warranty ~~it provides~~we provide and ~~records~~record a liability in the amount of such costs at the time the related revenue is recognized. Estimated warranty costs are determined by analyzing specific product and historical configuration statistics and regional warranty support costs. ~~The Company’s~~Our warranty obligation is affected by product failure rates, material usage and labor costs incurred in correcting product failures during the warranty period. As ~~the Company's~~our customer engineers and process support engineers are highly trained and deployed globally, labor availability is a significant factor in determining labor costs. The quantity and availability of critical replacement parts is another significant factor in estimating warranty costs. Unforeseen component failures or exceptional component performance can also result in changes to warranty costs. If actual warranty costs differ substantially from ~~the Company’s~~our estimates, revisions to the estimated warranty liability would be required.

Income Taxes: As part of the process of preparing ~~Veeco’s condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company is~~our Consolidated Financial Statements, we are required to estimate ~~its~~our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which ~~it operates.~~we operate. This process involves

estimating the actual current tax expense, together with assessing temporary differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes. These differences result in deferred tax assets and liabilities, which are included within ~~the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheets.~~our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The carrying value of our deferred tax assets is adjusted by a valuation allowance to recognize the extent to which the future tax benefits will be recognized on a more likely than not basis. ~~Veeco’s~~Our net deferred tax assets consist primarily of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, and timing differences between the book and

Table of Contents

tax treatment of inventory and other asset valuations. Realization of these net deferred tax assets is dependent upon ~~the Company’s~~our ability to generate future taxable income.

~~The Company~~We ~~records~~ record valuation allowances in order to reduce ~~its~~our deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. In assessing the adequacy of recorded valuation allowances, ~~it considers~~we consider a variety of factors, including the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, future taxable income, and prudent and feasible tax planning strategies. Under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes (“(“SFAS 109”), factors such as current and previous operating losses are given significantly greater weight than the outlook for future profitability in determining the deferred tax asset carrying value.

At September 30, ~~2007, the Company~~2008, we had a valuation allowance of approximately ~~$68.5~~$68.0 million against substantially all of ~~its~~our domestic net deferred tax assets, which consist of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards, as well as temporary deductible differences. The valuation allowance was calculated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 109, which ~~place~~places primary importance on ~~the Company’s~~our historical results of operations. Although ~~the Company’s~~our operating results in prior years were significantly affected by restructuring and other charges, ~~the Company’s~~our historical losses and the ~~losses~~loss incurred in ~~2005 and 2004~~2007 represent negative evidence sufficient to require a full valuation allowance under the provisions of SFAS 109. If ~~the Company is~~we are able to realize part or all of the deferred tax assets in future periods, itwe will reduce ~~its~~our provision for income taxes with a release of the valuation allowance in an amount that corresponds with the income tax liability generated.

In July 2006, the FASB issued ~~Interpretation No.~~FIN 48,~~Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes~~ ~~(“FIN 48”),~~ ~~an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109~~, which became effective for ~~Veeco~~us on January 1, 2007. FIN 48 addresses the determination of how tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN 48, ~~the Company~~we must recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained onunder examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such uncertain tax positions are measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate resolution. The application of income tax law is inherently complex. Laws and regulations in this area are voluminous and are often ambiguous. The Company is required to make many subjective assumptions and judgments regarding its income tax exposures. Interpretations of and guidance surrounding income tax laws and regulations change over time and changes in assumptions and judgments can materially affect the amounts recognized in the Company’s ~~condensed~~ consolidated financial statements. The impact of the Company’s reassessment of its tax positions in accordance with FIN 48 during the first quarter of 2007 resulted in a $0.8 million reduction to the January 1, 2007 retained earnings balance.

Share-Based Compensation: ~~In 2006, the Company adopted~~ ~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R),~~ ~~Share-Based Payment~~ (“ We account for our share-based compensation in accordance with SFAS 123(R)”)~~, which is a revision of~~ ~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (“SFAS 123”),~~ ~~Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation~~~~, supersedes Accounting Principles Board No. 25,~~ ~~Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees~~ ~~(“APB 25”) and amends~~ ~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95,~~~~Statement of Cash Flows~~ ~~(“SFAS 95”)~~. ~~Generally, the approach in SFAS 123(R) is similar to the approach described in SFAS 123. However,~~ SFAS 123(R) requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. ~~Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative.~~Additionally, SFAS No. 123(R) ~~was adopted using the modified prospective method of application, which~~ requires the ~~recognition~~benefits of tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation ~~expense on~~cost to be reported as a ~~prospective basis. Under this method, in addition to reflecting compensation expense for new share-based awards, expense is also recognized to reflect~~financing cash flow, rather than as an operating cash flow as required under previous accounting literature, which has the ~~remaining service period~~effect of ~~awards that had been included in the pro forma disclosures~~reducing consolidated net operating cash flows and increasing consolidated net financing cash flows in periods ~~reported prior to~~after adoption. For the ~~adoption of SFAS 123(R).~~nine months ended September 30, 2008, we did not recognize any consolidated financing cash flows for such excess tax deductions.

Under SFAS 123(R), ~~the Company is~~we are required to record the fair value of stock-based compensation awards as an expense. In order to determine the fair value of stock options on the grant date, ~~the Company applies~~we apply the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. Inherent in the model are assumptions related to expected stock-price volatility, option life, risk-free interest rate and dividend yield. While the risk-free interest rate and dividend yield are less subjective assumptions, typically based on factual data derived from public sources, the expected stock-price volatility and option life assumptions require a level of judgment which make them critical accounting estimates. ~~Since the fourth quarter of 2005, the Company has used~~We use an expected stock-price volatility assumption that is a combination of both historical and implied volatilities of the underlying stock, which is obtained from public data sources. ~~Prior to that time, the Company based this assumption solely on historical volatility.~~ ~~The Company considers~~We consider the exercise behavior of past grants and ~~models~~model the pattern of aggregate exercises in determining the expected weighted-average option life.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FSP 157-2. FSP 157-2 amends SFAS 157 to delay the effective date of SFAS 157 for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (that is, at least annually). For items within its scope, FSP 157-2 defers the effective date of SFAS 157 to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Currently we believe the impact of the adoption of FSP 157-2 in 2009 will be on our disclosures only.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141(R) and SFAS 160. Under SFAS 141(R), an acquiring entity will be required to recognize all the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition date at fair value with limited exceptions. SFAS 141(R) also changes the accounting treatment for certain other items that relate to business combinations. SFAS 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009. The purpose of SFAS 160 is to improve the relevance, comparability, and transparency of the financial information that a reporting entity provides in its consolidated financial statements. The most significant

Table of Contents

provisions of this statement result in changes to the presentation of noncontrolling interests in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The adoption of this statement will impact the manner in which we present noncontrolling interests, but will not impact our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In ~~September 2006,~~March 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. ~~157,~~161, ~~Fair Value Measurements~~Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (“SFAS ~~157”~~161”). SFAS ~~157 establishes a common definition~~161 changes the disclosure requirements for ~~fair value~~derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to ~~be applied to U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requiring use of fair value, establishes a framework~~provide disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for ~~measuring fair value,~~under FASB Statement No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and ~~expands disclosure about such fair value measurements.~~Hedging Activities, and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS ~~157~~161 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, ~~2007.~~2008 and requires comparative disclosures only for periods subsequent to initial adoption. The adoption of ~~this statement is~~the provisions of SFAS 161 will not ~~expected to have a material~~ impact ~~on the Company’s~~our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In ~~February 2007,~~May 2008, the FASB issued ~~Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159,~~ FSP APB 14-1. The ~~Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities~~ (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure financial assets and liabilities (except for those that are specifically scoped out of the Statement) at fair value. The election to measure a financial asset or liability at fair value can be made on an instrument-by-instrument basis and is irrevocable. The difference between carrying value and fair value at the election date is recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. Subsequent changes in fair value are recognized in earnings. SFAS 159guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after ~~November~~December 15, ~~2007. The adoption~~2008 and interim periods within those years. FSP APB 14-1 will require issuers of ~~this statement is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.~~

~~In July 2007, the FASB issued an Exposure Draft on Proposed FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. APB 14-a,~~ ~~Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash upon Conversion (including partial cash settlement)~~~~. The FSP will impact the accounting for certain structured~~ convertible debt ~~instruments~~ that ~~allow settlement~~can be settled in ~~any combination of~~ cash ~~and shares at the issuer’s option. The FSP would require bifurcation of~~to separately account for (i.e. bifurcate) a ~~component~~portion of the debt associated with the conversion feature ~~reclassification of that component~~and reclassify this portion to stockholders’ ~~equity, and then accretion~~equity. The liability portion, which represents the fair value of the ~~resulting discount on~~debt without the ~~debt~~conversion feature, will be accreted to its face value over the ~~remaining~~ life of the ~~obligation resulting in~~debt using the effective interest method, with the accretion expense ~~equal~~recorded to ~~the issuer’s nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. The intent is that the amount allocated to equity represents the interest cost that was “paid” for the conversion option. The proposed~~interest. FSP ~~would make any final guidance effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2007, would not permit early application, and would~~APB 14-1 will be applied retrospectively to all periods presented. The ~~Company has reviewed the impact~~cumulative effect of the ~~proposed~~change in accounting principle on periods prior to those presented will be recognized as of the beginning of the first period presented. We expect the adoption of FSP ~~and has determined that if the guidance is issued as currently proposed, it would result in a non-cash increase in interest expense, which could~~APB 14-1 to have a material ~~impact~~effect on ~~net income.~~ our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and earnings per share. Effective as of the date of issuance of the New Notes, we will reclassify approximately $16.3 million from long-term debt to additional paid-in capital, and as of the adoption of FSP APB 14-1 in the beginning of 2009, our accumulated deficit will reflect approximately $4.8 million of debt accretion that occurred between the issuance date of the New Notes and the adoption date. Approximately $3.2 to $3.7 million of additional interest expense will be recorded annually from the adoption date through the maturity date of the convertible debt. This additional interest expense will not require the use of cash.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

~~Veeco’s~~Our net sales to foreign customers represented approximately ~~71.1%~~66.4% and ~~68.4%~~64.9%, respectively, of ~~Veeco’s~~our total net sales for the three months and nine months ended September 30, ~~2007,~~2008, and 70.3% and 67.7%, respectively, ~~and 63.9% and 67.0%~~ for the comparable ~~2006 periods, respectively. The Company expects~~2007 periods. We expect that net sales to foreign customers will continue to represent a large percentage of ~~Veeco’s~~our total net sales. ~~Veeco’s~~Our net sales denominated in foreign currencies represented approximately ~~21.1%~~13.2% and ~~20.7%~~13.9% of ~~Veeco’s~~our total net sales for the three months and nine months ended September 30, ~~2007,~~2008, respectively, and ~~12.5%~~21.1% and ~~15.1%~~20.7%, respectively, for the comparable ~~2006 periods, respectively.~~2007 periods.

The condensed consolidated results of operations for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2008 include aggregate foreign currency gains of less than $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, which were net of losses of approximately $0.1 million and $0.3 million, respectively, related to forward contracts. For the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2007, ~~include~~the results included aggregate foreign currency losses of less than $0.1 million and approximately $0.3 million, ~~respectively. Included in those losses were losses~~respectively, which included gains of less than $0.1 million and losses of approximately $0.1 million, respectively, related to forward contracts. The 2006 condensed consolidated results of operations include aggregate foreign currency impact of a gain of approximately $0.1 million and a loss of approximately $0.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2006, respectively. Included in this impact were losses of approximately $0.3 million and $0.2 million,

~~respectively, related to forward hedge contracts.~~

~~Veeco is~~We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The changes in currency exchange rates that have the largest impact on translating ~~Veeco’s~~our international operating profit are the Japanese Yen and the Euro. ~~Veeco uses~~We use derivative financial instruments to mitigate these risks. ~~Veeco does~~We do not use derivative financial instruments for speculative or trading purposes. ~~The Company~~We generally ~~enters~~enter into monthly forward contracts to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign currency-denominated intercompany transactions and other known currency exposures. The average notional amount of such contracts was approximately ~~$3.0~~$0.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively, for ~~both~~ the three months and nine months ended September 30, ~~2007. As of~~2008. On September ~~30, 2007, the Company had~~25, 2008 we entered into ~~one~~two forward ~~contract~~contracts for the month of ~~October.~~ October with a total notional amount of approximately $3.5 million. The fair values of these contracts at inception were zero, which did not significantly change at September 30, 2008. We do not anticipate any significant future loss from fluctuations in currency exchange rates, as our hedging strategy is designed to minimize the risk of such fluctuations.

Table of Contents

Assuming third quarter ~~2007~~2008 variable debt and investment levels, the effect of a one-point change in interest rates would not have a material effect on net interest expense.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

~~The Company’s~~Our senior management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by ~~the Company~~us in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission’s~~SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~The Company has~~We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of ~~its~~our disclosure controls and procedures under the supervision of and with the participation of management, including the ~~Chief Executive Officer~~CEO and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, our ~~Chief Executive Officer~~CEO and ~~Chief Financial Officer~~CFO have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our periodic ~~Securities and Exchange Commission~~SEC filings.

~~The Company is presently in the process of implementing~~We have implemented new company-wide integrated applications ~~software and, as~~software. As of ~~September 30, 2007, has~~April 1, 2008, we have completed the conversion to this new platform in ~~ten~~all of Veeco’s business locations ~~with~~other than at the ~~remainder expected to be completed~~Mill Lane location, which was recently acquired by ~~the first half of 2008.~~Veeco. As a result, certain changes have been made to ~~the Company’s~~our internal controls, which management believes will strengthen ~~the Company’s~~our internal control structure. There have been no other significant changes in our internal controls or other factors during the fiscal quarter ended September 30, ~~2007~~2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, ~~the Company’s~~our internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal ~~Proceedings.~~Proceedings

~~As previously reported,~~On August 11, 2008, we announced that we had settled the patent litigation which we had brought in 2003 in the United States District Court for the Central District of California against Asylum Research Corporation, a privately-held company founded by former Veeco employees. In the lawsuit, we had alleged that the manufacture, use, and sale of Asylum’s MFP-3D AFM constituted willful infringement of five patents owned by us, as well as other claims. In the settlement, Veeco and certain of its officers have been named as defendants in a securities class action lawsuit consolidated in August 2005 that is pending in federal court in the Southern District of New York (“the Court”). The lawsuit arises out of the restatement in March 2005 of Veeco’s financial statements for the quarterly periods and nine months ended September 30, 2004 as a result of the Company’s discovery of certain improper accounting transactions at its TurboDisc business unit. On July 5, 2007, ~~Veeco entered into a Memorandum of Understanding~~Asylum agreed to ~~settle and fully resolve this lawsuit~~ for a payment of $5.5 million. Veeco expects that insurance proceeds will cover the settlement amount and any significant legal expenses related to the settlement. The settlement agreement is subject to court approval and would dismissdrop all pending claims against each other and agreed to a five year, worldwide cross license of each company’s patents and a mutual covenant not to sue on patents either party has a right to assert. Asylum made a net payment to Veeco and will pay an ongoing royalty to Veeco for the ~~other defendants with no admission or finding of wrongdoing by Veeco or any~~five-year term of the ~~other defendants, and~~cross license. As part of the settlement, Asylum acknowledged the validity of the Veeco ~~and the other defendants would receive a full release of all claims pending~~patents asserted in the ~~litigation.~~case. During the case, we capitalized legal costs incurred to defend our patents and are now amortizing these capitalized costs over the remaining lives of these patents. Payments received from Asylum have been and will continue to be netted against the capitalized legal costs upon receipt.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

~~Information~~In addition to the information regarding risk factors that appears in the “Safe Harbor Statement” at the beginning of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in Part I—I — Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2006. There~~2007, we have ~~been no~~noted the following significant risk factor as of September 30, 2008:

The recent turmoil in the world’s credit markets may have a protracted adverse impact on capital spending in the markets we serve and, as a result, could have a material ~~changes from~~adverse effect on our business and our results of operations.

We are exposed to the ~~risk factors previously disclosed~~risks associated with the volatility of the U.S. and global economies. In October 2008, the global financial markets experienced significant losses due to failures of many dominant financial institutions. The governments of the United States and several foreign countries instituted a bailout plan to assist many banks and lenders through the economic crisis. This crisis results in a lack of visibility regarding whether or when there will be sustained

Table of Contents

growth periods for sales of our ~~Annual Report~~products and uncertainty regarding the amount of sales, since many of our customers rely on ~~Form 10-K.~~lending arrangements and/or have limited resources to finance capital technology expenditures. In addition, it is expected that this crisis and economic uncertainty will result in decreased consumer business and government spending, which will likely reduce the need our customers have for our products. Slow or negative growth in the global economy may continue to materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations for the foreseeable future. Our results of operations would be further adversely affected if we were to experience lower than anticipated order levels, cancellations of orders in backlog, extended customer delivery requirements, or pricing pressure as a result of a slowdown. Any negative effect on our earnings may affect our borrowing availability and potentially result in noncompliance with the restrictive covenants of our existing credit agreement.

Item 6. Exhibits.

Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission~~SEC by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

Number	Description	Incorporated by Reference to the Following Document:

3.1	Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective October 23, 2008	Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 27, 2008, Exhibit 3.1

10.1	~~Credit~~Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of ~~August 20, 2007, by~~September 12, 2008 between John F. Rein, Jr. and ~~among~~ Veeco Instruments Inc.~~, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.~~	*

10.2	Amendment ~~and Reaffirmation dated August 20, 2007 of~~ ~~Security~~to Employment Agreement dated as of ~~March 15, 2005 among~~September 12, 2008 between Robert P. Oates and Veeco Instruments Inc.~~, the subsidiaries of Veeco named therein and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent.~~	*

10.3	Senior Executive Change in Control Policy effective as of September 12, 2008	*

10.4	Service Agreement effective July 24, 2008 between Edward H. Braun and Veeco Instruments Inc.	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.1

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule ~~13a-14(a)~~13a—14(a) or Rule ~~15d-14(a)~~15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.	*

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule ~~13a-14(a)~~13a—14(a) or Rule ~~15d-14(a)~~15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.	*

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.	*

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.	*

* Filed herewith

2930

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: October ~~30, 2007~~29, 2008

	Veeco Instruments Inc.

	By:	/s/ JOHN R. PEELER
		John R. Peeler Chief Executive Officer

	By:	/s/ JOHN F. REIN, JR.
		John F. Rein, Jr. Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer ~~and Secretary~~

3031

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Unless otherwise indicated, each of the following exhibits has been previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by the Company under File No. 0-16244.

Number	Description	Incorporated by Reference to the Following Document:

3.1	Fourth Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Company, effective October 23, 2008	Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 27, 2008, Exhibit 3.1

10.1	~~Credit~~Amendment to Employment Agreement dated as of ~~August 20, 2007, by~~September 12, 2008 between John F. Rein, Jr. and ~~among~~ Veeco Instruments Inc.~~, HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein.~~	*

10.2	Amendment ~~and Reaffirmation dated August 20, 2007 of~~ ~~Security~~to Employment Agreement dated as of ~~March 15, 2005 among~~September 12, 2008 between Robert P. Oates and Veeco Instruments Inc.~~, the subsidiaries of Veeco named therein and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, as administrative agent.~~	*

10.3	Senior Executive Change in Control Policy effective as of September 12, 2008	*

10.4	Service Agreement effective July 24, 2008 between Edward H. Braun and Veeco Instruments Inc.	Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, Exhibit 10.1

31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule ~~13a-14(a)~~13a—14(a) or Rule ~~15d-14(a)~~15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.	*

31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule ~~13a-14(a)~~13a—14(a) or Rule ~~15d-14(a)~~15d—14(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.	*

32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.	*

32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the ~~Sarbanes-Oxley~~Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.	*

*Filed herewith

	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
	(In thousands )

Parts and components (1)	$	60,121	$	60,249
Work in process (1)	32,192		27,961
Finished goods	13,346		12,145
	$	105,659	$	100,355

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2007			2006
	(In thousands)

Balance as of January 1	$	7,118		$	6,671
Warranties issued during the period	4,170			5,088
Settlements made during the period	(4,788		)	(4,602		)
Balance as of September 30	$	6,500		$	7,157

	Process Equipment		Metrology			Unallocated Corporate Amount			Total
Three Months Ended September 30, 2007
Net sales	$	62,923	$	34,795		$	—		$	97,718
Income (loss) before interest, taxes, amortization and certain items (EBITA)	$	2,249	$	(395	)	$	(3,553	)	$	(1,699	)
Interest expense, net	—		—			665			665
Amortization expense	1,444		399			116			1,959
Restructuring expense	159		46			324			529
Income (loss) before income taxes and noncontrolling interest	$	646	$	(840	)	$	(4,658	)	$	(4,852	)

	Process Equipment			Metrology			Corporate			Total
Charged to accrual	$	159		$	1,398		$	417		$	1,974
Cash payments during 2007	(93		)	(692		)	(70		)	(855		)
Balance as of September 30, 2007	$	66		$	706		$	347		$	1,119

	Sales									Orders
	Three Months Ended				Dollar and					Three Months Ended				Dollar and					Book to Bill
	September 30,				Percentage					September 30				Percentage					Ratio
					Change									Change
	2007		2006		Year to Year					2007		2006		Year to Year					2007	2006

Segment Analysis
Process Equipment	$	62,923	$	71,375	$	(8,452	)	(11.8	)%	$	80,918	$	74,806	$	6,112		8.2	%	1.29	1.05
Metrology	34,795		40,994		(6,199		)	(15.1	)	37,399		40,042		(2,643		)	(6.6	)	1.08	0.98
Total	$	97,718	$	112,369	$	(14,651	)	(13.0	)%	$	118,317	$	114,848	$	3,469		3.0	%	1.21	1.02

Industry Analysis
Data Storage	$	29,340	$	45,410	$	(16,070	)	(35.4	)%	$	35,207	$	45,345	$	(10,138	)	(22.4	)%	1.20	1.00
HB-LED/wireless	31,495		27,657		3,838			13.9		43,636		29,207		14,429			49.4		1.39	1.06
Semiconductor	11,804		15,978		(4,174		)	(26.1	)	6,489		14,193		(7,704		)	(54.3	)	0.55	0.89
Research and Industrial	25,079		23,324		1,755			7.5		32,985		26,103		6,882			26.4		1.32	1.12
Total	$	97,718	$	112,369	$	(14,651	)	(13.0	)%	$	118,317	$	114,848	$	3,469		3.0	%	1.21	1.02

Regional Analysis (1)
North America	$	29,014	$	41,921	$	(12,907	)	(30.8	)%	$	48,196	$	45,349	$	2,847		6.3	%	1.66	1.08
Europe	18,244		14,882		3,362			22.6		22,220		15,558		6,662			42.8		1.22	1.05
Japan	12,585		7,718		4,867			63.1		12,330		13,226		(896		)	(6.8	)	0.98	1.71
Asia-Pacific	37,875		47,848		(9,973		)	(20.8	)	35,571		40,715		(5,144		)	(12.6	)	0.94	0.85
Total	$	97,718	$	112,369	$	(14,651	)	(13.0	)%	$	118,317	$	114,848	$	3,469		3.0	%	1.21	1.02

	Sales									Orders

	Nine Months Ended				Dollar and					Nine Months Ended				Dollar and					Book to Bill
	September 30,				Percentage					September 30,				Percentage					Ratio
					Change									Change
	2007		2006		Year to Year					2007		2006		Year to Year					2007	2006

Segment Analysis
Process Equipment	$	181,028	$	191,927	$	(10,899	)	(5.7	)%	$	227,285	$	252,608	$	(25,323	)	(10.0	)%	1.26	1.32
Metrology	114,625		125,995		(11,370		)	(9.0	)	109,392		132,142		(22,750		)	(17.2	)	0.95	1.05
Total	$	295,653	$	317,922	$	(22,269	)	(7.0	)%	$	336,677	$	384,750	$	(48,073	)	(12.5	)%	1.14	1.21

Industry Analysis
Data Storage	$	96,006	$	138,598	$	(42,592	)	(30.7	)%	$	105,944	$	187,177	$	(81,233	)	(43.4	)%	1.10	1.35
HB-LED/wireless	78,240		61,177		17,063			27.9		117,008		80,939		36,069			44.6		1.50	1.32
Semiconductor	32,755		39,735		(6,980		)	(17.6	)	26,562		44,288		(17,726		)	(40.0	)	0.81	1.11
Research and Industrial	88,652		78,412		10,240			13.1		87,163		72,346		14,817			20.5		0.98	0.92
Total	$	295,653	$	317,922	$	(22,269	)	(7.0	)%	$	336,677	$	384,750	$	(48,073	)	(12.5	)%	1.14	1.21

Regional Analysis (1)
North America	$	95,516	$	109,180	$	(13,664	)	(12.5	)%	$	121,696	$	138,251	$	(16,555	)	(12.0	)%	1.27	1.27
Europe	53,199		49,332		3,867			7.8		63,396		42,374		21,022			49.6		1.19	0.86
Japan	43,732		34,016		9,716			28.6		42,125		44,400		(2,275		)	(5.1	)	0.96	1.31
Asia-Pacific	103,206		125,394		(22,188		)	(17.7	)	109,460		159,725		(50,265		)	(31.5	)	1.06	1.27
Total	$	295,653	$	317,922	$	(22,269	)	(7.0	)%	$	336,677	$	384,750	$	(48,073	)	(12.5	)%	1.14	1.21