Table of Contents

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549


 

FORM 10-Q

 

x    Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2015

or

o     Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

 

For the transition period from              to             

 

Commission File Number 001-31901

 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

TENNESSEE

63-0169720

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)

63-0169720

 (IRS(IRS Employer Identification Number)

 

2801 HIGHWAY 280 SOUTH

BIRMINGHAM, ALABAMA 35223

(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)

 

(205) 268-1000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 


 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes x  No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filerfiler”, and large accelerated filer”“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer o

 

Accelerated Filer o

 

 

 

Non-accelerated filer x

 

Smaller Reporting Company o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes o  No x

 

Number of shares of Common Stock, $1.00 Par Value, outstanding as of August 1, 2014:April 30, 2015:  5,000,000

 

 

 



Table of Contents

 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014MARCH 31, 2015

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

Page

 

PART I

 

 

 

Item 1.

Financial Statements (unaudited):

 

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for the Period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor), the Period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor) and For The Three and Nine Months Ended September 30,March 31, 2014 and 2013(Predecessor)

3

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor), the Period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor) and For The Three and Nine Months Ended September 30,March 31, 2014 and 2013(Predecessor)

4

 

Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor) and December 31, 20132014 (Predecessor)

5

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Shareowner’sShareowners’ Equity For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014Period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor) and for the Period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor)

7

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor), the Period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor) and For The NineThree Months Ended September 30,March 31, 2014 and 2013(Predecessor)

8

 

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

9

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

6575

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

133142

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

133142

 

 

 

 

PART II

 

 

 

 

Item 1A.

Risk Factors and Cautionary Factors that may Affect Future Results

133142

Item 6.

Exhibits

144151

 

Signature

145

 

2



Table of Contents

 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(Unaudited)

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums and policy fees

 

$

755,300

 

$

653,664

 

$

2,415,806

 

$

2,129,616

 

 

$

506,386

 

 

$

260,582

 

$

812,323

 

Reinsurance ceded

 

(283,104

)

(277,628

)

(964,865

)

(1,000,245

)

 

(146,813

)

 

(91,632

)

(333,506

)

Net of reinsurance ceded

 

472,196

 

376,036

 

1,450,941

 

1,129,371

 

 

359,573

 

 

168,950

 

478,817

 

Net investment income

 

532,861

 

434,772

 

1,572,474

 

1,320,848

 

 

272,211

 

 

164,605

 

514,037

 

Realized investment gains (losses):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative financial instruments

 

41,769

 

32,212

 

(34,425

)

102,410

 

 

(4,948

)

 

22,031

 

(39,574

)

All other investments

 

(116

)

(19,268

)

152,496

 

(133,741

)

 

(35,056

)

 

81,153

 

72,146

 

Other-than-temporary impairment losses

 

(1,142

)

(6,635

)

(2,026

)

(9,764

)

 

 

 

(636

)

(423

)

Portion recognized in other comprehensive income (before taxes)

 

(1,212

)

(2,046

)

(3,379

)

(7,501

)

 

 

 

155

 

(1,168

)

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

 

(2,354

)

(8,681

)

(5,405

)

(17,265

)

 

 

 

(481

)

(1,591

)

Other income

 

72,404

 

65,523

 

209,214

 

180,595

 

 

49,181

 

 

23,388

 

65,514

 

Total revenues

 

1,116,760

 

880,594

 

3,345,295

 

2,582,218

 

 

640,961

 

 

459,646

 

1,089,349

 

Benefits and expenses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance ceded: (three months: 2014 - $217,179; 2013 - $203,361; nine months: 2014 - $849,151; 2013 - $882,203)

 

628,527

 

622,910

 

2,102,596

 

1,759,780

 

Benefits and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance ceded: (2015 Successor - $120,522; 2015 Predecessor - $96,141; 2014 Predecessor - $304,136)

 

485,424

 

 

266,575

 

727,428

 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

140,517

 

17,388

 

266,572

 

117,115

 

 

28,036

 

 

4,817

 

65,882

 

Other operating expenses, net of reinsurance ceded: (three months: 2014 - $49,909; 2013 - $48,371; nine months: 2014 - $141,502; 2013 - $141,136)

 

163,596

 

126,941

 

467,781

 

403,227

 

Other operating expenses, net of reinsurance ceded: (2015 Successor - $23,746; 2015 Predecessor - $17,700; 2014 Predecessor - $44,392)

 

102,965

 

 

55,407

 

144,428

 

Total benefits and expenses

 

932,640

 

767,239

 

2,836,949

 

2,280,122

 

 

616,425

 

 

326,799

 

937,738

 

Income before income tax

 

184,120

 

113,355

 

508,346

 

302,096

 

 

24,536

 

 

132,847

 

151,611

 

Income tax expense

 

62,287

 

37,107

 

167,921

 

98,966

 

 

8,116

 

 

44,325

 

49,062

 

Net income

 

$

121,833

 

$

76,248

 

$

340,425

 

$

203,130

 

 

$

16,420

 

 

$

88,522

 

$

102,549

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

 

3



Table of Contents

 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Net income

 

$

121,833

 

$

76,248

 

$

340,425

 

$

203,130

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of income tax: (three months: 2014 - $(46,077); 2013 - $(145,250); nine months: 2014 - $429,653; 2013 - $(641,404))

 

(85,574

)

(269,751

)

797,925

 

(1,191,178

)

Reclassification adjustment for investment amounts included in net income, net of income tax : (three months: 2014 - $(6,962); 2013 - $(653); nine months: 2014 - $(15,543); 2013 - $(9,533))

 

(12,928

)

(1,212

)

(28,864

)

(17,705

)

Change in net unrealized gains (losses) relating to other-than-temporary impaired investments for which a portion has been recognized in earnings, net of income tax: (three months: 2014 - $561; 2013 - $(1,543); nine months: 2014 - $2,419; 2013 - $1,383)

 

1,044

 

(2,865

)

4,494

 

2,570

 

Change in accumulated (loss) gain - derivatives, net of income tax: (three months: 2014 - $(22); 2013 - $8; nine months: 2014 - $(31); 2013 - $(55))

 

(41

)

14

 

(58

)

(103

)

Reclassification adjustment for derivative amounts included in net income, net of income tax: (three months: 2014 - $103; 2013 - $200; nine months: 2014 - $552; 2013 - $577)

 

190

 

372

 

1,025

 

1,072

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

(97,309

)

(273,442

)

774,522

 

(1,205,344

)

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

24,524

 

$

(197,194

)

$

1,114,947

 

$

(1,002,214

)

 

 

Successor

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Company

 

 

Company

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Net income

 

$

16,420

 

 

$

88,522

 

$

102,549

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of income tax: (2015 Successor - $(157,377); 2015 Predecessor - $259,616; 2014 Predecessor - $259,403)

 

(292,273

)

 

482,143

 

481,747

 

Reclassification adjustment for investment amounts included in net income, net of income tax: (2015 Successor - $(131); 2015 Predecessor - $(2,244); 2014 Predecessor - $(2,023))

 

(242

)

 

(4,166

)

(3,756

)

Change in net unrealized gains (losses) relating to other-than- temporary impaired investments for which a portion has been recognized in earnings, net of income tax: (2015 Successor - $0; 2015 Predecessor - $(131); 2014 Predecessor - $2,429)

 

 

 

(243

)

4,511

 

Change in accumulated (loss) gain - derivatives, net of income tax: (2015 Successor - $(12); 2015 Predecessor - $5; 2014 Predecessor - $316)

 

(23

)

 

9

 

587

 

Reclassification adjustment for derivative amounts included in net income, net of income tax: (2015 Successor - $31; 2015 Predecessor - $13; 2014 Predecessor - $235)

 

59

 

 

23

 

436

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

 

(292,479

)

 

477,766

 

483,525

 

Total comprehensive income (loss)

 

$

(276,059

)

 

$

566,288

 

$

586,074

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

 

4



Table of Contents

 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturities, at fair value (amortized cost: 2014 -$34,201,634; 2013 - $33,648,298)

 

$

36,902,927

 

$

34,804,919

 

Fixed maturities, at amortized cost (fair value: 2014 - $453,741; 2013 - $335,676)

 

415,000

 

365,000

 

Equity securities, at fair value (cost: 2014 - $746,759; 2013 - $632,652)

 

761,449

 

602,388

 

Mortgage loans (2014 and 2013 includes $489,667 and $627,731 related to securitizations)

 

5,232,463

 

5,493,492

 

Investment real estate, net of accumulated depreciation (2014 - $341; 2013 - $937)

 

12,033

 

16,873

 

Fixed maturities, at fair value (amortized cost: 2015 Successor - $38,147,597; 2014 Predecessor - $33,717,848)

 

$

37,619,537

 

 

$

36,756,240

 

Fixed maturities, at amortized cost (fair value: 2015 Successor - $528,828; 2014 Predecessor - $485,422)

 

551,320

 

 

435,000

 

Equity securities, at fair value (cost: 2015 Successor - $698,958; 2014 Predecessor - $735,297)

 

701,283

 

 

756,790

 

Mortgage loans (related to securitizations: 2015 Successor - $441,624; 2014 Predecessor - $455,250)

 

5,589,795

 

 

5,133,780

 

Investment real estate, net of accumulated depreciation (2015 Successor - $21; 2014 Predecessor - $246)

 

7,435

 

 

5,918

 

Policy loans

 

1,767,228

 

1,815,744

 

 

1,735,370

 

 

1,758,237

 

Other long-term investments

 

425,944

 

424,481

 

 

574,787

 

 

491,282

 

Short-term investments

 

178,299

 

133,025

 

 

246,622

 

 

246,717

 

Total investments

 

45,695,343

 

43,655,922

 

 

47,026,149

 

 

45,583,964

 

Cash

 

209,915

 

345,579

 

 

348,625

 

 

268,286

 

Accrued investment income

 

491,413

 

461,838

 

 

483,599

 

 

474,095

 

Accounts and premiums receivable, net of allowance for uncollectible amounts (2014 - $3,768; 2013 - $4,211)

 

120,155

 

101,324

 

Accounts and premiums receivable

 

123,033

 

 

81,137

 

Reinsurance receivables

 

5,942,959

 

6,008,010

 

 

5,508,682

 

 

5,907,662

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

3,148,705

 

3,476,621

 

 

1,316,346

 

 

3,155,046

 

Goodwill

 

78,351

 

80,675

 

 

735,712

 

 

77,577

 

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation (2014 - $115,261; 2013 - $110,080)

 

51,771

 

51,071

 

Other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization (2015 Successor - $6,886)

 

676,114

 

 

 

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation (2015 Successor - $1,382; 2014 Predecessor - $116,688)

 

102,062

 

 

51,760

 

Other assets

 

462,741

 

501,303

 

 

233,004

 

 

398,574

 

Income tax receivable

 

28,646

 

12,399

 

 

 

 

1,648

 

Assets related to separate accounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable annuity

 

13,040,828

 

12,791,438

 

 

13,339,653

 

 

13,157,429

 

Variable universal life

 

813,178

 

783,618

 

 

857,167

 

 

834,940

 

Total assets

 

$

70,084,005

 

$

68,269,798

 

 

$

70,750,146

 

 

$

69,992,118

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

 

5



Table of Contents

 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(continued)

(Unaudited)

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In
Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Future policy benefits and claims

 

$

29,876,274

 

$

29,771,958

 

 

$

30,158,274

 

 

$

29,944,477

 

Unearned premiums

 

1,464,724

 

1,500,394

 

 

629,420

 

 

1,515,001

 

Total policy liabilities and accruals

 

31,340,998

 

31,272,352

 

 

30,787,694

 

 

31,459,478

 

Stable value product account balances

 

2,261,546

 

2,559,552

 

 

1,923,684

 

 

1,959,488

 

Annuity account balances

 

11,083,763

 

11,125,253

 

 

10,846,606

 

 

10,950,729

 

Other policyholders’ funds

 

1,377,504

 

1,214,380

 

 

1,340,943

 

 

1,430,325

 

Other liabilities

 

1,200,852

 

945,911

 

 

1,392,173

 

 

1,178,962

 

Income tax payable

 

60,173

 

 

 

Deferred income taxes

 

1,485,744

 

1,041,420

 

 

1,689,760

 

 

1,611,864

 

Non-recourse funding obligations

 

1,539,415

 

1,495,448

 

 

1,914,016

 

 

1,527,752

 

Repurchase program borrowings

 

359,804

 

350,000

 

 

510,123

 

 

50,000

 

Liabilities related to separate accounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable annuity

 

13,040,828

 

12,791,438

 

 

13,339,653

 

 

13,157,429

 

Variable universal life

 

813,178

 

783,618

 

 

857,167

 

 

834,940

 

Total liabilities

 

64,503,632

 

63,579,372

 

 

64,661,992

 

 

64,160,967

 

Commitments and contingencies - Note 10

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Shareowner’s equity

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Preferred Stock; $1 par value, shares authorized: 2,000; Liquidation preference: $2,000

 

2

 

2

 

 

2

 

 

2

 

Common Stock, $1 par value, shares authorized and issued: 2014 and 2013 - 5,000,000

 

5,000

 

5,000

 

Common Stock, $1 par value, shares authorized and issued: 2015 and 2014 - 5,000,000

 

5,000

 

 

5,000

 

Additional paid-in-capital

 

1,433,258

 

1,433,258

 

 

6,359,211

 

 

1,437,787

 

Retained earnings

 

2,828,625

 

2,713,200

 

 

16,420

 

 

2,905,151

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of income tax: (2014 - $704,663; 2013 - $290,553)

 

1,308,659

 

539,598

 

Net unrealized (losses) gains relating to other-than-temporary impaired investments for which a portion has been recognized in earnings, net of income tax: (2014 - $2,744; 2013 - $325)

 

5,097

 

603

 

Accumulated loss - derivatives, net of income tax: (2014 - $(145); 2013 - $(665))

 

(268

)

(1,235

)

Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments, net of income tax: (2015 Successor - $(157,508); 2014 Predecessor - $796,488)

 

(292,515

)

 

1,479,192

 

Net unrealized (losses) gains relating to other-than-temporary impaired investments for which a portion has been recognized in earnings, net of income tax: (2015 Successor - $0; 2014 Predecessor - $2,208)

 

 

 

4,101

 

Accumulated loss - derivatives, net of income tax: (2015 Successor - $19; 2014 Predecessor - $(45))

 

36

 

 

(82

)

Total shareowner’s equity

 

5,580,373

 

4,690,426

 

 

6,088,154

 

 

5,831,151

 

Total liabilities and shareowner’s equity

 

$

70,084,005

 

$

68,269,798

 

 

$

70,750,146

 

 

$

69,992,118

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

 

6



Table of Contents

 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF SHAREOWNER’S EQUITY

(Unaudited)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

Preferred

 

Common

 

Paid-In-

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Shareowner’s

 

 

 

Stock

 

Stock

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

Equity

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

2

 

$

5,000

 

$

1,433,258

 

$

2,713,200

 

$

538,966

 

$

4,690,426

 

Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

340,425

 

 

 

340,425

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

774,522

 

774,522

 

Comprehensive income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,114,947

 

Dividends to the parent company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(225,000

)

 

 

(225,000

)

Balance, September 30, 2014

 

$

2

 

$

5,000

 

$

1,433,258

 

$

2,828,625

 

$

1,313,488

 

$

5,580,373

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

Preferred

 

Common

 

Paid-In-

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Shareowner’s

 

Predecessor Company

 

Stock

 

Stock

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Income (Loss)

 

Equity

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, December 31, 2014

 

$

2

 

$

5,000

 

$

1,437,787

 

$

2,905,151

 

$

1,483,211

 

$

5,831,151

 

Net income for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

88,522

 

 

 

88,522

 

Other comprehensive income

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

477,766

 

477,766

 

Comprehensive income for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

566,288

 

Balance, January 31, 2015

 

$

2

 

$

5,000

 

$

1,437,787

 

$

2,993,673

 

$

1,960,977

 

$

6,397,439

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additional

 

 

 

Other

 

Total

 

 

 

Preferred

 

Common

 

Paid-In-

 

Retained

 

Comprehensive

 

Shareowner’s

 

Successor Company

 

Stock

 

Stock

 

Capital

 

Earnings

 

Income (Loss)

 

Equity

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, February 1, 2015

 

$

2

 

$

5,000

 

$

6,504,211

 

$

 

$

 

$

6,509,213

 

Net income for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

16,420

 

 

 

16,420

 

Other comprehensive loss

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(292,479

)

(292,479

)

Comprehensive loss for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(276,059

)

Return of capital

 

 

 

 

 

(145,000

)

 

 

 

 

(145,000

)

Balance, March 31, 2015

 

$

2

 

$

5,000

 

$

6,359,211

 

$

16,420

 

$

(292,479

)

$

6,088,154

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

 

7



Table of Contents

 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

For The Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Cash flows from operating activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net income

 

$

340,425

 

$

203,130

 

 

$

16,420

 

 

$

88,522

 

$

102,549

 

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Realized investment losses (gains)

 

(112,666

)

48,596

 

 

40,004

 

 

(102,703

)

(30,981

)

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

266,572

 

117,115

 

 

28,036

 

 

4,817

 

65,882

 

Capitalization of deferred policy acquisition costs

 

(219,157

)

(245,751

)

 

(49,851

)

 

(22,799

)

(59,764

)

Depreciation expense

 

5,461

 

6,570

 

Depreciation and amortization expense

 

8,268

 

 

796

 

1,792

 

Deferred income tax

 

29,556

 

115,117

 

 

(14,345

)

 

91,709

 

(9,161

)

Accrued income tax

 

(16,247

)

48,699

 

 

110,290

 

 

(48,469

)

50,082

 

Interest credited to universal life and investment products

 

663,117

 

532,396

 

 

130,209

 

 

79,088

 

210,800

 

Policy fees assessed on universal life and investment products

 

(729,929

)

(659,058

)

 

(188,403

)

 

(90,288

)

(253,394

)

Change in reinsurance receivables

 

65,051

 

99,719

 

 

29,955

 

 

(98,148

)

(14,104

)

Change in accrued investment income and other receivables

 

(28,075

)

(30,645

)

 

(41,574

)

 

(1,285

)

(24,820

)

Change in policy liabilities and other policyholders’ funds of traditional life and health products

 

4,862

 

258,684

 

 

(114,029

)

 

176,119

 

15,963

 

Trading securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maturities and principal reductions of investments

 

71,646

 

152,948

 

 

27,556

 

 

17,946

 

25,257

 

Sale of investments

 

187,829

 

220,711

 

 

31,584

 

 

26,422

 

47,457

 

Cost of investments acquired

 

(160,134

)

(297,558

)

 

(75,342

)

 

(27,289

)

(37,070

)

Other net change in trading securities

 

(43,699

)

(9,069

)

 

51,908

 

 

(26,901

)

(20,589

)

Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on investments

 

57,807

 

 

3,420

 

10,018

 

Change in other liabilities

 

256,769

 

(41,161

)

 

(41,118

)

 

211,031

 

10,203

 

Other income - gains on repurchase of non-recourse funding obligations

 

(1,500

)

(1,250

)

Other, net

 

(41,791

)

(37,109

)

 

95,891

 

 

(133,928

)

(71,952

)

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

538,090

 

482,084

 

 

103,266

 

 

148,060

 

18,168

 

Cash flows from investing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maturities and principal reductions of investments, available-for-sale

 

941,989

 

752,754

 

 

45,532

 

 

59,028

 

221,379

 

Sale of investments, available-for-sale

 

1,485,538

 

1,730,095

 

 

721,935

 

 

200,716

 

374,956

 

Cost of investments acquired, available-for-sale

 

(3,055,927

)

(3,073,905

)

 

(1,185,394

)

 

(150,030

)

(900,627

)

Change in investments, held-to-maturity

 

(50,000

)

(50,000

)

 

(20,000

)

 

 

(20,000

)

Mortgage loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

New lendings

 

(649,125

)

(392,758

)

 

(248,508

)

 

(100,530

)

(126,896

)

Repayments

 

908,364

 

541,597

 

 

223,644

 

 

45,741

 

222,646

 

Change in investment real estate, net

 

4,840

 

(3,805

)

 

21

 

 

7

 

49

 

Change in policy loans, net

 

48,516

 

9,058

 

 

16,502

 

 

6,365

 

22,634

 

Change in other long-term investments, net

 

(69,720

)

(203,622

)

 

(34,184

)

 

(25,372

)

(72,988

)

Change in short-term investments, net

 

(22,401

)

(11,574

)

 

15,799

 

 

(39,312

)

(41,467

)

Net unsettled security transactions

 

8,243

 

31,686

 

 

5,100

 

 

37,510

 

45,145

 

Purchase of property and equipment

 

(6,160

)

(16,611

)

 

(709

)

 

(648

)

(3,072

)

Payments for business acquisitions

 

(906

)

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(456,749

)

(687,085

)

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(460,262

)

 

33,475

 

(278,241

)

Cash flows from financing activities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Issuance (repayment) of non-recourse funding obligations

 

44,000

 

45,000

 

 

20,000

 

 

 

19,989

 

Repurchase program borrowings

 

9,804

 

(50,000

)

 

460,123

 

 

 

125,000

 

Dividends paid to the parent company

 

(225,000

)

(44,963

)

Dividends/Return of capital to parent company

 

(145,000

)

 

 

(75,000

)

Investment product deposits and change in universal life deposits

 

2,415,424

 

2,413,676

 

 

462,674

 

 

169,233

 

696,229

 

Investment product withdrawals

 

(2,461,200

)

(2,198,547

)

 

(471,218

)

 

(240,147

)

(577,210

)

Other financing activities, net

 

(33

)

 

 

139

 

 

(4

)

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(217,005

)

165,166

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

326,718

 

 

(70,918

)

189,008

 

Change in cash

 

(135,664

)

(39,835

)

 

(30,278

)

 

110,617

 

(71,065

)

Cash at beginning of period

 

345,579

 

269,582

 

 

378,903

 

 

268,286

 

345,579

 

Cash at end of period

 

$

209,915

 

$

229,747

 

 

$

348,625

 

 

$

378,903

 

$

274,514

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements

 

8



Table of Contents

 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1.                                      BASIS OF PRESENTATION

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements of Protective Life Insurance Company (the “Company”), a stock life insurance company, was founded in 1907. The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Protective Life Corporation (“PLC”), an insurance holding company. On February 1, 2015, PLC became a wholly owned subsidiary of The Dai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Limited, a kabushiki kaisha organized under the laws of Japan (“Dai-ichi Life”), when DL Investment (Delaware), Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of Dai-ichi Life, merged with and into PLC. Prior to February 1, 2015, and for the periods reported as “predecessor”, PLC’s stock was publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange and subsequent to the Merger date, PLC and the Company remain as SEC registrants within the United States. PLC is a holding company with subsidiaries that provide financial services through the production, distribution, and administration of insurance and investment products.

The Merger was accounted for by PLC under the acquisition method of accounting under ASC Topic 805 Business Combinations. In accordance with ASC Topic 805-20-30, all identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed were measured at fair value as of the acquisition date. PLC elected to apply “pushdown” accounting by applying the guidance allowed by ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, including the initial recognition of most of PLC’s assets and liabilities at fair value as of the acquisition date, and similarly recognizing goodwill calculated based on the terms of the transaction and the fair value of the new basis of net assets of PLC. The new basis of accounting will be the basis of the accounting records in the preparation of future financial statements and related disclosures after the Merger date. Goodwill of $735.7 million represents the cost in excess of the fair value of PLC’s net assets acquired (including identifiable intangibles) in the Merger, and reflects the Company’s assembled workforce, future growth potential and other sources of value not associated with identifiable assets.

The Merger was accounted for by the Company in a manner consistent with that utilized by PLC. In accordance with ASC Topic 805-20-30, all identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed were measured at fair value as of the acquisition date. In conjunction with PLC’s and the Company’s election to apply “pushdown” accounting to reflect the impact of the transaction and the new basis of net assets recorded as of February 1, 2015, the entire amount of goodwill and other identifiable intangible assets recognized by PLC were allocated to the Company. This was supported by the fact that the Company is the primary operating subsidiary of PLC and the workforce, distribution and sales organization, current and future policy and portfolio cash flows, and other items for which the transaction was primarily based are consistent between PLC and Company.  As such, the entire balance of goodwill of $735.7 million is included in the new basis of net assets of the Company. The new basis of accounting will be the basis of the accounting records in the preparation of future financial statements and related disclosures after the Merger date.

These financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions. Such accounting principles differ from statutory reporting practices used by insurance companies in reporting to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.state regulatory authorities. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring items) necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Operating results for the threeperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and nine month periods ended September 30, 2014,the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014.2015 (Successor Company). The year-end consolidated condensed financial data included herein was derived from audited financial statements but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP.GAAP within this report. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company is a wholly owned subsidiary of Protective Life Corporation (“PLC”)2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

The operating results of companies in the insurance industry have historically been subject to significant fluctuations due to changing competition, economic conditions, interest rates, investment performance, insurance ratings, claims, persistency, and other factors.

Reclassifications

 

Certain reclassifications have been made in the previously reported financial statements and accompanying notes to make the prior year amounts comparable to those of the current year. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income or shareowner’s equity.

9



Table of Contents

Entities Included

 

The consolidated condensed financial statements for the predecessor and successor periods presented in this report include the accounts of Protective Life Insurance Company and its affiliate companies in which the Company holds a majority voting or economic interest. Intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

 

2.                                      SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Significant Accounting Policies

 

For a full description of significant accounting policies, see Note 2 to consolidated financial statementsConsolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Although there were no2014. Other than the accounting matters resulting from the application of pushdown accounting in connection with ASC Topic 805, the Company did not make significant changes to the Company’s accounting policies during the ninethree months ended September 30, 2014, the Company has clarified the disclosures related to its reinsurance accounting methodologyMarch 31, 2015 except as follows:noted below.

 

Reinsurance Accounting Methodology—Ceded premiumsIntangible Assets

Intangible assets with definite lives are amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset. Amortizable intangible assets primarily consist of distribution relationships, trade names, and technology. Intangible assets with indefinite lives, primarily insurance licenses, are not amortized.

Value of Business Acquired

In conjunction with the Merger, a portion of the purchase price was allocated to the right to receive future gross profits from cash flows and earnings of the Company’s insurance policies and investment contracts as of the date of the Merger. This intangible asset, called VOBA, is based on the actuarially estimated present value of future cash flows from the Company’s insurance policies and investment contracts in-force on the date of the Merger. The estimated present value of future cash flows used in the calculation of the VOBA is based on certain assumptions, including mortality, persistency, expenses, and interest rates that the Company expects to experience in future years. The Company amortizes VOBA in proportion to gross premiums for traditional life products, or estimated gross margins (“EGMs”) for participating traditional life products within the MONY block. For interest sensitive products, the Company uses various amortization bases including expected gross profits (“EGPs”), revenues, or insurance products are treatedin-force.

Goodwill

Goodwill of $735.7 million was recognized in conjunction with the Merger as an offset to direct premium and policy fee revenue and are recognized when due to the assuming company. Ceded claims are treated as an offset to direct benefits and settlement expenses and are recognized when the claim is incurred on a direct basis. Ceded policy reserve changes are also treated as an offset to benefits and settlement expenses and are recognized during the applicable financial reporting period. Expense allowances paid by the assuming companies which are allocable to the current period are treated as an offset to other operating expenses. Since reinsurance treaties typically provide for allowance percentages that decrease over the lifetime of a policy, allowances in excess of the “ultimate”purchase considerations over the fair value of PLC’s identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The entire balance of goodwill was allocated to the Company. The balance recognized as goodwill is not amortized, but is reviewed for impairment on an annual basis, or final level allowance are capitalized. Amortizationmore frequently as events or circumstances may warrant, including those circumstances which would more likely than not reduce the fair value of capitalized reinsurance expense allowances representing recovery of acquisition costs is treated as an offset to direct amortization of DAC or VOBA.the Company’s reporting units below its carrying amount.

 

9Property and Equipment



Table of Contents

 

Amortization of deferred expense allowances is calculated as a level percentage of expected premiums in all durations given expected future lapses and mortality and accretion due to interest.

The Company utilizes reinsurance on certain short duration insurance contracts (primarily issued through the Asset Protection segment). As part of these reinsurance transactions the Company receives reinsurance allowances which reimburse the Company for acquisition costs such as commissions and premium taxes. A ceding fee is also collected to cover other administrative costs and profits for the Company. As a component of reinsurance costs, reinsurance allowances are accounted for in accordanceIn conjunction with the relevant provisions of ASC Financial Services — Insurance Topic, which state that reinsurance costs shouldMerger, property and equipment was recorded at fair value and will be amortized over the contract period of the reinsurance if the contract is short-duration.  Accordingly, reinsurance allowances received related to short-duration contracts are capitalized and charged to expensedepreciated from this basis in proportion to premiums earned. Ceded unamortized acquisition costs are netted with direct unamortized acquisition costs in the balance sheet.

Ceded premiums and policy fees on the Company’s universal life (“UL”), VUL, bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”), and annuity products reduce premiums and policy fees recognized by the Company. Ceded claims are treated as an offset to direct benefits and settlement expenses and are recognized when the claim is incurred on a direct basis. Ceded policy reserve changes are also treated as an offset to benefits and settlement expenses and are recognized during the applicable valuation period.

Since reinsurance treaties typically provide for allowance percentages that decrease over the lifetime of a policy, allowances in excess of the “ultimate” or final level allowance are capitalized. Amortization of capitalized reinsurance expense allowances are amortized based on future expected gross profits. Assumptions regarding mortality, lapses, and interest rates are continuously reviewed and may be periodically changed. These changes will result in “unlocking” that changes the balance in the ceded deferred acquisition cost and can affect the amortization of DAC and VOBA. Ceded unearned revenue liabilities are also amortized based on expected gross profits. Assumptions areperiods based on the best current estimaterespective estimated useful lives. Real estate assets were recorded at appraised values as of expected mortality, lapses and interest spread.

the acquisition date. The Company has also assumed certain policy risks written by other insurance companies through reinsurance agreements. Premiums and policy fees as well as Benefits and settlement expenses include amounts assumed under reinsurance agreements and are net of reinsurance ceded. Assumed reinsurance is accounted for in accordance with ASC Financial Services—Insurance Topic.

Reinsurance Allowances — Long-Duration Contracts — Reinsurance allowances are intended to reimburseestimated the ceding company for some portion of the ceding company’s commissions, expenses, and taxes. The amount and timing of reinsurance allowances (both first year and renewal allowances) are contractually determined by the applicable reinsurance contract and do not necessarily bear a relationship to the amount and incidence of expenses actually paid by the ceding company in any given year.

Ultimate reinsurance allowances are defined as the lowest allowance percentage paid by the reinsurer in any policy duration over the lifetime of a universal life policy (or through the end of the level term period for a traditional life policy). Ultimate reinsurance allowances are determined during the negotiation of each reinsurance agreement and will differ between agreements.

The Company determines its “cost of reinsurance” to include amounts paid to the reinsurer (ceded premiums) net of amounts reimbursed by the reinsurer (in the form of allowances).  As noted within ASC Financial Services—Insurance Topic, “The difference, if any, between amounts paid for a reinsurance contract and the amount of the liabilities for policy benefits relating to the underlying reinsured contracts is part of the estimated cost to be amortized.”  The Company’s policy is to amortize the cost of reinsurance over theremaining useful life of the underlying reinsured contracts (for long-duration policies) in a manner consistent with the way in which benefits and expenses on the underlying contracts are recognized.  For the Company’s long-duration contracts, ithome office building to be 25 years. Land is the Company’s practice to defer reinsurance allowances as a component of the cost of reinsurance and recognize the portion related to the recovery of acquisition costs as a reduction of applicable unamortized acquisition costs in such a manner that net acquisition costs are capitalized and charged to expense in proportion to net revenue recognized. The remaining balance of reinsurance allowances are included as a component of the cost of reinsurance and those allowances which are allocable to the current period are recorded as an offset to operating expenses in the current period consistent with the recognition of benefits and expenses on the underlying reinsured contracts. This practice is consistent with the Company’s practice ofnot depreciated.

 

10



Table of Contents

 

capitalizingThe carrying amounts of the Company’s fixed assets are as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Home office building

 

$

65,102

 

 

$

75,109

 

Land

 

24,920

 

 

 

Data processing equipment

 

10,377

 

 

40,568

 

Other, principally furniture and equipment

 

3,045

 

 

52,771

 

 

 

103,444

 

 

168,448

 

Accumulated depreciation

 

1,382

 

 

116,688

 

Total property and equipment

 

$

102,062

 

 

$

51,760

 

Guaranteed Minimum Withdrawal Benefits

The Company also establishes reserves for guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) on its variable annuity (“VA”) products. The GMWB is valued in accordance with FASB guidance under the ASC Derivatives and Hedging Topic which utilizes the valuation technique prescribed by the ASC Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic, which requires the liability to be recorded at fair value using current implied volatilities for the equity indices. The methods used to estimate the liabilities employ assumptions about mortality, lapses, policyholder behavior, equity market returns, interest rates, and market volatility. The Company assumes age-based mortality from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1994 Variable Annuity MGDB Mortality Table for company experience.  Differences between the actual experience and the assumptions used result in variances in profit and could result in losses.  In conjunction with the merger the Company updated the fair value of the GMWB reserves to reflect current assumptions as of February 1, 2015 (Successor Company). As a result of the application of ASC Topic 805, the Company reset the hedge premium rates utilized in the valuation for all policies to be equal to the present value of future claims with the reset hedge premium rates being capped at the actual charges to the policyholder. This update resulted in a decrease in the net liability of approximately $69.4 million on the Merger date. The Company reinsures certain risks associated with the GMWB to Shades Creek Captive Insurance Company (“Shades Creek”), a direct wholly owned subsidiary of PLC. As of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the net GMWB asset held, including the impact of reinsurance was approximately $10.8 million.

Policyholder Liabilities

Insurance Liabilities and Reserves

In conjunction with the Merger and in accordance with ASC 805, insurance liabilities and reserves are recorded at fair value and the underlying contracts are considered to be new contracts, for measurement and reporting purposes as of the acquisition date.  Estimating liabilities for future policy benefits on life and health insurance products requires the use of assumptions relative to future investment yields, mortality, morbidity, persistency, and other assumptions based on the Company’s historical experience, modified as necessary to reflect anticipated trends and to include provisions for possible adverse deviation. Determining liabilities for the Company’s property and casualty insurance products also requires the use of assumptions, including the projected levels of used vehicle prices, the frequency and severity of claims, and the effectiveness of internal processes designed to reduce the level of claims. The Company’s results depend significantly upon the extent to which its actual claims experience is consistent with the assumptions the Company used in determining its reserves and pricing its products. The Company’s reserve assumptions and estimates require significant judgment and, therefore, are inherently uncertain. The Company cannot determine with precision the ultimate amounts that it will pay for actual claims or the timing of those payments. As such, at the acquisition date, the Company updated the assumptions described above to reflect current best estimates and reserves were calculated in accordance with the methodology described below. VOBA was recorded to reflect the difference between the fair value of the contractual insurance liability and the reserve established.

11



Table of Contents

Traditional Life, Health, and Credit Insurance Products

Traditional life insurance products consist principally of those products with fixed and guaranteed premiums and benefits, and they include whole life insurance policies, term and term-like life insurance policies, limited payment life insurance policies, and certain annuities with life contingencies. In accordance with ASC 805, the liabilities for future policy benefits on traditional life insurance products, when combined with the associated VOBA, have been recorded at fair value. These values were computed using assumptions that includes interest rates, mortality, lapse rates, expenses (e.g. commissions)estimates, and other assumptions based on the Company’s experience, modified as necessary to reflect anticipated trends and to include provisions for possible adverse deviation. The liability for future policy benefits and claims on traditional life, health, and credit insurance products includes estimated unpaid claims that have been reported to us and claims incurred but not yet reported.

Universal Life and Investment Products

Universal life and investment products include universal life insurance, guaranteed investment contracts, guaranteed funding agreements, deferred annuities, and annuities without life contingencies. Benefit reserves for universal life and investment products represent policy account balances before applicable surrender charges plus certain deferred policy initiation fees that are recognized in income over the term of the policies. Policy benefits and claims that are charged to expense include benefit claims incurred in the period in excess of related policy account balances and interest credited to policy account balances.

The Company establishes liabilities for fixed indexed annuity (“FIA”) products. These products are deferred fixed annuities with a guaranteed minimum interest rate plus a contingent return based on equity market performance. The FIA product is considered a hybrid financial instrument under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or “Codification”) Topic 815—Derivatives and Hedging which allows the Company to make the election to value the liabilities of these FIA products at fair value. This election was made for the FIA products issued prior to 2010 as the policies were issued. These products are no longer being marketed. The future changes in the fair value of the liability for these FIA products will be recorded in Benefit and settlement expenses with the liability being recorded in Annuity account balances. For more information regarding the determination of fair value of annuity account balances please refer to Note 14, Fair Value of Financial Instruments. Premiums and policy fees for these FIA products consist of fees that have been assessed against the policy account balances for surrenders. Such fees are recognized when assessed and earned.

The Company currently markets a deferred fixed annuity with a guaranteed minimum interest rate plus a contingent return based on equity market performance and the products are considered hybrid financial instruments under the FASB’s ASC Topic 815—Derivatives and Hedging. The Company did not elect to value these FIA products at fair value prior to the merger date.  As a result the Company accounts for the provision that provides for a contingent return based on equity market performance as an embedded derivative. The embedded derivative is bifurcated from the host contract and recorded at fair value in Other liabilities. The host contract is accounted for as a debt instrument in accordance with ASC Topic 944—Financial Services—Insurance and is recorded in Annuity account balances with any discount to the minimum account value being accreted using the effective yield method. Benefits and settlement expenses include accreted interest and benefit claims incurred during the period.

The Company markets universal life products with a guaranteed minimum interest rate plus a contingent return based on equity market performance and are considered hybrid financial instruments under the FASB’s ASC Topic 815—Derivatives and Hedging. The Company did not elect to value these IUL products at fair value prior to the Merger date. As a result the Company accounts for the provision that provides for a contingent return based on equity market performance as an embedded derivative. The embedded derivative is bifurcated from the host contract and recorded at fair value in Other liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative are recorded in Realized investment gains (losses)—Derivative financial instruments. For more information regarding the determination of fair value of the IUL embedded derivative refer to Note 14, Fair Value of Financial Instruments. The host contract is accounted for as a debt instrument in accordance with ASC Topic 944—Financial Services—Insurance and is recorded in Future policy benefits and claims with any discount to the minimum account value being accreted using the effective yield method. Benefits and settlement expenses include accreted interest and benefit claims incurred during the period.

12



Table of Contents

The Company’s accounting policies with respect to variable universal life (“VUL”) and VA are identical except that policy account balances (excluding account balances that earn a fixed rate) are valued at fair value and reported as components of assets and liabilities related to separate accounts.

The Company establishes liabilities for guaranteed minimum death benefits (“GMDB”) on its VA products. The methods used to estimate the liabilities employ assumptions about mortality and the performance of equity markets. The Company assumes age-based mortality from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1994 Variable Annuity MGDB Mortality Table for company experience. Future declines in the equity market would increase the Company’s GMDB liability. Differences between the actual experience and the assumptions used result in variances in profit and could result in losses. Our GMDB as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), are subject to a dollar-for-dollar reduction upon withdrawal of related annuity deposits on contracts issued prior to January 1, 2003. The Company reinsures certain risks associated with the GMDB to Shades Creek. As of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the GMDB reserve, including the impact of reinsurance was $25.6 million.

Property and resultsCasualty Insurance Products

Property and casualty insurance products include service contract business, surety bonds, and guaranteed asset protection (“GAP”). Unearned premium reserves are maintained for the portion of the premiums that is related to the unexpired period of the policy. Benefit reserves are recorded when insured events occur. Benefit reserves include case basis reserves for known but unpaid claims as of the balance sheet date as well as incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) reserves for claims where the insured event has occurred but has not been reported to the Company as of the balance sheet date. The case basis reserves and IBNR are calculated based on historical experience and on assumptions relating to claim severity and frequency, the level of used vehicle prices, and other factors. These assumptions are modified as necessary to reflect anticipated trends.

Reinsurance

The Company uses reinsurance extensively in certain of its segments and accounts for reinsurance and the recognition of the impact of reinsurance allowances on a systematic basis overcosts in accordance with the lifeASC Financial Services — Insurance Topic. The following summarizes some of the reinsuredkey aspects of the Company’s accounting policies on a basis consistent with the way in which acquisition costs on the underlying reinsured contracts would be recognized.  In some cases reinsurance allowances allocable to the current period may exceed non-deferred direct costs, which may cause net other operating expenses (related to specific contracts) to be negative.for reinsurance.

 

Amortization of Reinsurance Allowances—Reinsurance allowances do not affect the methodology used to amortize DACAssets and VOBA, or the period over which such DAC and VOBA are amortized. Reinsurance allowances offset the direct expenses capitalized, reducing the net amount that is capitalized. DAC and VOBA on traditional life policies are amortized based on the pattern of estimated gross premiums of the policies in force. Reinsurance allowances do not affect the gross premiums, so therefore they do not impact traditional life amortization patterns. DAC and VOBA on universal life products are amortized based on the pattern of estimated gross profits of the policies in force. Reinsurance allowances are considered in the determination of estimated gross profits, and therefore do impact amortization patterns.

Reinsurance Liabilities—LiabilitiesClaim liabilities and policy benefits are calculated consistently for all policies in accordance with GAAP, regardless of whether or not the policy is reinsured. Once the claim liabilities and policy benefits for the underlying policies are estimated, the amounts recoverable from the reinsurers are estimated based on a number of factors including the terms of the reinsurance contracts, historical payment patterns of reinsurance partners, and the financial strength and credit worthiness of reinsurance partners.partners and recorded as Reinsurance receivables on the balance sheet. The reinsurance receivables were recorded in the balance sheet using current accounting policies and the most current assumptions as of the merger date. As of the merger date, the Company also calculated the ceded VOBA associated with the reinsured policies. The reinsurance receivables combined with the associated ceded VOBA represent the fair value of the reinsurance assets. Liabilities for unpaid reinsurance claims are produced from claims and reinsurance system records, which contain the relevant terms of the individual reinsurance contracts. The Company monitors claims due from reinsurers to ensure that balances are settled on a timely basis. Incurred but not reported claims are reviewed by the Company’s actuarial staff to ensure that appropriate amounts are ceded.

 

The Company analyzes and monitors the credit worthiness of each of its reinsurance partners to minimize collection issues. For newly executed reinsurance contracts with reinsurance companies that do not meet predetermined standards, the Company requires collateral such as assets held in trusts or letters of credit.

 

Components of Reinsurance Cost—The following income statement lines are affected by reinsurance cost:Accounting Pronouncements Recently Adopted

 

PremiumsAccounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08—Reporting Discontinued Operations and policy fees (“reinsurance ceded”Disclosure of Disposals of Components of an Entity.  This Update changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and related disclosures. The Update limits the definition of a discontinued operation to disposals that represent “strategic shifts” that will have a major effect on an entity’s operation and financial results. Additionally, the Update requires enhanced disclosures about the components of discontinued operations and the financial effects of the disposal. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual and interim periods beginning

13



Table of Contents

after December 15, 2014. The Company has reviewed the additional disclosures required by the Update, and will apply the revised guidance to any disposals occurring after the effective date.

ASU No. 2014-11—Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures.  This Update changes the requirements for classification of certain repurchase agreements, and will expand the use of secured borrowing accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions. In addition, the Update requires additional disclosures for repurchase agreements accounted for both as sales and as secured borrowings. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The Update did not impact the Company’s financial statements) represent consideration paidposition or results of operations. The Company has updated its policies and processes to ensure compliance with the assuming company for accepting the ceding company’s risks. Ceded premiums and policy fees increase reinsurance cost.additional disclosure requirements in this Update.

 

BenefitsASU No. 2014-17—Business Combinations (Topic 805).  This Update relates to “pushdown accounting”, which refers to pushing down the acquirer’s accounting and settlement expenses include incurred claim amounts cededreporting basis (which is recognized in conjunction with its accounting for a business combination) to the acquiree’s standalone financial statements. The new guidance makes pushdown accounting optional for an acquiree that is a business or nonprofit activity when there is a change-in- control event (e.g., the acquirer in a business combination obtains control over the acquiree). In addition, the staff of the SEC released Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 115, which rescinds SAB Topic 5J, “New Basis of Accounting Required in Certain Circumstances” (the SEC staff’s pre-existing guidance on pushdown accounting) and changes in ceded policy reserves. Ceded benefitsconforms SEC guidance on pushdown accounting to the FASB’s new guidance. The new pushdown accounting guidance became effective upon its issuance on November 18, 2014. Although now optional, the Company has applied pushdown accounting to its standalone financial statements effective with the Company becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of Dai-ichi Life on February 1, 2015. The presentation within this report for predecessor and settlement expenses decrease reinsurance cost.successor periods is consistent with this Update.

 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition cost and VOBA reflects the amortization of capitalized reinsurance allowances representing recovery of acquisition costs. Ceded amortization decreases reinsurance cost.

Other expenses include reinsurance allowances paid by assuming companies to the Company less amounts representing recovery of acquisition costs. Reinsurance allowances decrease reinsurance cost.

The Company’s reinsurance programs do not materially impact the other income line of the Company’s income statement. In addition, net investment income generally has no direct impact on the Company’s reinsurance cost. However, it should be noted that by ceding business to the assuming companies, the Company forgoes investment income on the reserves ceded to the assuming companies. Conversely, the assuming companies will receive investment income on the reserves assumed which will increase the assuming companies’ profitability on business assumed from the Company.

Accounting Pronouncements Not Yet Adopted

Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08 — Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosure of Disposals of Components of an Entity. This Update changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations and related disclosures. The Update limits the definition of a discontinued operation to

11



Table of Contents

disposals that represent “strategic shifts” that will have a major effect on an entity’s operation and financial results. Additionally, the Update requires enhanced disclosures about the components of discontinued operations and the financial effects of the disposal. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The Company is reviewing the additional disclosures required by the Update, and will apply the revised guidance to any disposals occurring after the effective date.

 

ASU No. 2014-09 — 2014-09—Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).This Update provides for significant revisions to the recognition of revenue from contracts with customers across various industries. Under the new guidance, entities are required to apply a prescribed 5-step process to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The accounting for revenues associated with insurance products is not within the scope of this Update. The Update is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2016.2017. The Company is reviewing its policies and processes to ensure compliance with the requirements in this Update, upon adoption.

 

ASU No. 2014-11 — Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings, and Disclosures. This Update changes the requirements for classification of certain repurchase agreements, and will expand the use of secured borrowing accounting for repurchase-to-maturity transactions. In addition, the Update requires additional disclosures for repurchase agreements accounted for both as sales and as secured borrowings. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2014. The Update is not anticipated to impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The Company is reviewing its policies and processes to ensure compliance with the additional disclosure requirements in this Update.

ASU No. 2014-15 — 2014-15—Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.This Update will require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and will require footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. Under the updated guidance, management should consider relevant conditions and evaluate whether it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations within one year after the issuance date of the financial statements. The Update is effective for annual periods ending December 31, 2016 and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption is permitted. The amendments in this Update will not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations. However, the new guidance will require a formal assessment of going concern by management based on criteria prescribed in the new guidance. The Company is reviewing its policies and processes to ensure compliance with the new guidance.

 

ASU No. 2015-02—Consolidation—Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis.  This Update makes several targeted changes to generally accepted accounting principles, including a) eliminating the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership and b) eliminating the consolidation model specific to limited partnerships. The amendments also clarify when fees and related party relationships should be considered in the consolidation of variable interest entities. The amendments in this Update are effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is reviewing its policies and processes to ensure compliance with the requirements in this Update, upon adoption.

ASU No. 2015-03—Interest—Imputation of Interest. The objective of this Update is to eliminate diversity in practice related to the presentation of debt issuance costs. The amendments in this Update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying

14



Table of Contents

amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this Update. The Update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and requires revised presentation of debt issuance costs in all periods presented in the financial statements. The Company is reviewing its processes to ensure compliance with the revised guidance.

ASU No. 2015-05 — Intangibles — Goodwill and Other — Internal-Use Software - The amendments in this Update provide guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, then the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If a cloud computing arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for the arrangement as a service contract. The guidance will not change GAAP for a customer’s accounting for service contracts. The Update is effect for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is reviewing its policies and processes to ensure compliance with the revised guidance.

3.                                      SIGNIFICANT ACQUISITIONSDAI-ICHI MERGER

 

On OctoberFebruary 1, 2013 the Company completed the acquisition2015 PLC, subsequent to required approvals from PLC’s shareholders and relevant regulatory authorities, became a wholly owned subsidiary of Dai-ichi Life as contemplated by the master agreementAgreement and Plan of Merger (the “Master“Merger Agreement”) dated April 10, 2013. Pursuantwith Dai-ichi Life and DL Investment (Delaware), Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Dai-ichi Life, which provided for the Merger of DL Investment (Delaware), Inc. with and into PLC, with PLC surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Dai-ichi Life. On February 1, 2015 each share of PLC’s common stock outstanding was converted into the right to that Master Agreementreceive $70 per share, without interest (the “Per Share Merger Consideration”). The aggregate cash consideration paid in connection with AXA Financial, Inc. (“AXA”)the Merger for the outstanding shares of common stock was approximately $5.6 billion and AXA Equitable Financial Services, LLC (“AEFS”),paid directly to the shareowners of record by Dai-ichi Life.  According to public statements by both companies, the Merger will provide Dai-ichi Life with a platform for growth in the United States, where it did not previously have a significant presence. In connection with the completion of the Merger, PLC’s previously publicly traded equity was delisted from the NYSE, although PLC and the Company acquiredremain SEC registrants for financial reporting purposes in the stock of MONY Life Insurance Company (“MONY”) from AEFS and entered into a reinsurance agreement (the “Reinsurance Agreement”) pursuant to which it reinsured on a 100% indemnity reinsurance basis certain business (the “MLOA Business”) of MONY Life Insurance Company of America (“MLOA”). The final aggregate purchase price of MONY was $689 million. The ceding commission for the reinsurance of the MLOA Business was $370 million. Together, the purchase of MONY and reinsurance of the MLOA Business are hereto referred to as (the “MONY acquisition”). The MONY acquisition allowed PLC to invest its capital and increase the scale of its Acquisitions segment. The MONY acquisition business is comprised of traditional and universal life insurance policies and fixed and variable annuities, most of which were written prior to 2004.United States.

 

The MONY acquisitionMerger was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting under ASC Topic 805. In accordance with ASC Topic 805-20-30, all identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed were measured at fair value as of the acquisition date. DuringGoodwill of $735.7 million represents the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as a result of new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed ascost in excess of the acquisition date,fair value of PLC’s net assets acquired (including identifiable intangibles) in the Company recorded certain measurement period adjustments to fixed maturities, mortgage loans, cash, accountsMerger, and premiums receivable, VOBA, other assets, deferred income taxes,reflects the Company’s assembled workforce, future policy benefits and claims, other policyholders’ funds,growth potential and other liabilities. These were customary adjustments that occurred duringsources of value not associated with identifiable assets. None of the normal course of reviewing and integrating the MONY acquisition. The net result on the amount of VOBA recorded by the Company in relation to the MONY acquisition was to decrease VOBA by approximately $14.0 million. This impact has been revised in the comparative consolidated balance sheet presented asgoodwill is tax deductible.

 

1215



Table of Contents

 

of December 31, 2013. The Company has determined that the impact on amortization and other related amounts within the comparative interim and annual periods from that previously presented in the annual or interim consolidated condensed statements of income is immaterial. The amounts presented in the following table related to the MONY acquisition (presented as of the acquisition date of October 1, 2013) have been retrospectively revised for the aforementioned measurement period adjustments.

The following table summarizes the consideration paid for the acquisition and the determination of the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date:

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

October 1, 2013

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturities, at fair value

 

$

6,557,853

 

Equity securities, at fair value

 

108,413

 

Fixed maturities

 

$

38,342,948

 

Equity securities

 

699,081

 

Mortgage loans

 

830,415

 

 

5,580,229

 

Investment real estate

 

7,456

 

Policy loans

 

967,534

 

 

1,751,872

 

Other long-term investments

 

657,346

 

Short-term investments

 

130,963

 

 

311,236

 

Total investments

 

8,595,178

 

 

47,350,168

 

Cash

 

216,164

 

 

378,903

 

Accrued investment income

 

114,695

 

 

483,691

 

Accounts and premiums receivable, net of allowance for uncollectible amounts

 

26,055

 

Accounts and premiums receivable

 

104,260

 

Reinsurance receivables

 

422,692

 

 

5,538,637

 

Value of business acquired

 

205,767

 

 

1,278,064

 

Goodwill

 

735,712

 

Other intangibles

 

683,000

 

Property and equipment

 

102,736

 

Other assets

 

5,104

 

 

224,555

 

Income tax receivables

 

21,197

 

Deferred income taxes

 

188,142

 

Separate account assets

 

195,452

 

Income tax receivable

 

50,117

 

Assets related to separate accounts

 

 

 

Variable annuity

 

12,970,587

 

Variable universal life

 

819,188

 

Total assets

 

$

9,990,446

 

 

$

70,719,618

 

Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Future policy benefits and claims

 

$

7,645,969

 

Future policy and benefit claims

 

$

30,195,397

 

Unearned premiums

 

3,066

 

 

622,278

 

Total policy liabilities and accruals

 

7,649,035

 

 

30,817,675

 

Stable value product account balances

 

1,932,277

 

Annuity account balances

 

752,163

 

 

10,941,661

 

Other policyholders’ funds

 

636,448

 

 

1,388,083

 

Other liabilities

 

66,124

 

 

1,533,666

 

Non-recourse funding obligation

 

2,548

 

Separate account liabilities

 

195,344

 

Deferred income taxes

 

1,861,632

 

Non-recourse funding obligations

 

1,895,636

 

Repurchase program borrowings

 

50,000

 

Liabilities related to separate accounts

 

 

 

Variable annuity

 

12,970,587

 

Variable universal life

 

819,188

 

Total liabilities

 

9,301,662

 

 

64,210,405

 

Net assets acquired

 

$

688,784

 

 

$

6,509,213

 

 

The following (unaudited) pro forma condensedAs of the acquisition date, all contractual cash flows related to the Company’s historical and acquired receivables (as presented within this consolidated results of operations assumes that the aforementioned acquisition was completed as of January 1, 2012:balance sheet) are expected to be collected.

 

 

Unaudited

 

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30, 2013

 

September 30, 2013

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Revenue

 

$

1,094,417

 

$

3,222,936

 

Net income

 

$

111,224

 

$

262,132

 

 

1316



Table of Contents

Intangible assets recognized by the Company included the following (excluding goodwill):

 

 

Estimated

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value on

 

Estimated

 

 

 

Acquisition Date

 

Useful Life

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

(In Years)

 

Distribution relationships

 

$

405,000

 

14-22

 

Trade names

 

103,000

 

13-17

 

Technology

 

143,000

 

7-14

 

Total intangible assets subject to amortization

 

651,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance licenses

 

32,000

 

Indefinite

 

Total intangible assets

 

$

683,000

 

 

 

Identified intangible assets were valued using the excess earnings method, relief from royalty method or cost approach, as appropriate.

Amortizable intangible assets will be amortized straight line over their assigned useful lives. The following is a schedule of estimated aggregate amortization expense:

Year

 

Amount

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

2015

 

$

37,870

 

2016

 

41,313

 

2017

 

41,313

 

2018

 

41,313

 

2019

 

41,313

 

All tangible and intangible assets of the Company were allocated to applicable operating segments in connection with the recording of pushdown accounting.  The purchase price was also allocated to each operating segment in accordance with the determined fair value of the operating segments, such that the total reconciled with the total consideration paid in the merger.  Subtraction of the fair value of the tangible and intangible assets for each operating segment from the allocated purchase price of that operating segment resulted in the goodwill allocated to each operating segment. The amount of goodwill allocated to each operating segment is reflected in Note 17, Operating Segments.

17



Table of Contents

 

Treatment of Benefit Plans

At or immediately prior to the Merger, each stock appreciation right with respect to shares of PLC’s Common Stock granted under any Stock Plan (each, a “SAR”) that were outstanding and unexercised immediately prior to the Merger and that had a base price per share of Common Stock underlying such SAR (the “Base Price”) that was less than the Per Share Merger Consideration (each such SAR, an “In-the-Money SAR”), whether or not exercisable or vested, was cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash less any applicable withholding taxes, determined by multiplying (i) the excess of the Per Share Merger Consideration over the Base Price of such In-the-Money SAR by (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock subject to such In- the-Money SAR (such amount, the “SAR Consideration”).

At or immediately prior to the effective time of the Merger, each restricted stock unit with respect to a share of PLC Common Stock granted under any Stock Plan (each, a “RSU”) that was outstanding immediately prior to the Merger, whether or not vested, was cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash, without interest, less any applicable withholding taxes, determined by multiplying (i) the Per Share Merger Consideration by (ii) the number of RSUs.

The number of performance shares earned for each award of performance shares granted under any Stock Plan was calculated by determining the number of performance shares that would have been paid if the subject award period had ended on the December 31 immediately preceding the Merger (based on the conditions set for payment of performance share awards for the subject award period), provided that the number of performance shares earned for each award were not less than the aggregate number of performance shares at the target performance level. Each performance share earned that was outstanding immediately prior to the Merger, whether or not vested, was cancelled and converted into the right to receive an amount in cash, without interest, less any applicable withholding taxes, determined by multiplying (i) the Per Share Merger Consideration by (ii) the number of Performance Shares.

4.                                      MONY CLOSED BLOCK OF BUSINESS

 

In 1998, MONY converted from a mutual insurance company to a stock corporation (“demutualization”). In connection with its demutualization, an accounting mechanism known as a closed block (the “Closed Block”) was established for certain individuals’ participating policies in force as of the date of demutualization. Assets, liabilities, and earnings of the Closed Block are specifically identified to support its participating policyholders. The Company acquired the Closed Block in conjunction with the MONY acquisition as discussed in Note 3, Significant Acquisitions.acquisition.

 

Assets allocated to the Closed Block inure solely to the benefit of each Closed Block’s policyholders and will not revert to the benefit of MONY or the Company. No reallocation, transfer, borrowing or lending of assets can be made between the Closed Block and other portions of MONY’s general account, any of MONY’s separate accounts or any affiliate of MONY without the approval of the Superintendent of The New York State Insurance Department (the “Superintendent”). Closed Block assets and liabilities are carried on the same basis as similar assets and liabilities held in the general account.

 

The excess of Closed Block liabilities over Closed Block assets (adjusted to exclude the impact of related amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”)) at the acquisitionmerger date represented the estimated maximum future post-tax earnings from the Closed Block that would be recognized in income from continuing operations over the period the policies and contracts in the Closed Block remain in force. In connection with the acquisition of MONY, the Company has developed an actuarial calculation of the expected timing of MONY’s Closed Block’s earnings as of October 1, 2013. Pursuant to the acquisition of PLC by Dai-ichi Life, this actuarial calculation of the expected timing of MONY’s Closed Block earnings was recalculated and reset as of February 1, 2015, along with the establishment of a policyholder dividend obligation as of such date.

 

If the actual cumulative earnings from the Closed Block are greater than the expected cumulative earnings, only the expected earnings will be recognized in the Company’s net income. Actual cumulative earnings in excess of expected cumulative earnings at any point in time are recorded as a policyholder dividend obligation because they will

18



Table of Contents

ultimately be paid to Closed Block policyholders as an additional policyholder dividend unless offset by future performance that is less favorable than originally expected. If a policyholder dividend obligation has been previously established and the actual Closed Block earnings in a subsequent period are less than the expected earnings for that period, the policyholder dividend obligation would be reduced (but not below zero). If, over the period the policies and contracts in the Closed Block remain in force, the actual cumulative earnings of the Closed Block are less than the expected cumulative earnings, only actual earnings would be recognized in income from continuing operations. If the Closed Block has insufficient funds to make guaranteed policy benefit payments, such payments will be made from assets outside the Closed Block.

 

Many expenses related to Closed Block operations, including amortization of VOBA, are charged to operations outside of the Closed Block; accordingly, net revenues of the Closed Block do not represent the actual profitability of the Closed Block operations. Operating costs and expenses outside of the Closed Block are, therefore, disproportionate to the business outside of the Closed Block.

 

14



Table of Contents

Summarized financial information for the Closed Block fromas of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and December 31, 2013 through September 30, 2014 (Predecessor Company) is as follows:follows:

 

 

 

As of

 

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Closed block liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

Future policy benefits, policyholders’ account balances and other

 

$

6,172,310

 

$

6,261,819

 

Policyholder dividend obligation

 

301,215

 

190,494

 

Other liabilities

 

28,102

 

1,259

 

Total closed block liabilities

 

6,501,627

 

6,453,572

 

Closed block assets

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value

 

$

4,441,257

 

$

4,113,829

 

Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value

 

5,384

 

5,223

 

Mortgage loans on real estate

 

483,836

 

601,959

 

Policy loans

 

780,450

 

802,013

 

Cash and other invested assets

 

16,411

 

140,577

 

Other assets

 

214,785

 

206,938

 

Total closed block assets

 

5,942,123

 

5,870,539

 

Excess of reported closed block liabilities over closed block assets

 

559,504

 

583,033

 

Portion of above representing accumulated other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized investment gains (losses) net of deferred tax benefit of $0 and $1,074 net of policyholder dividend obligation of $69,409 and $12,720

 

 

(1,994

)

Future earnings to be recognized from closed block assets and closed block liabilities

 

$

559,504

 

$

581,039

 

Reconciliation of the policyholder dividend obligation from December 31, 2013 through September 30, 2014 is as follows:

 

 

For The

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Policyholder dividend obligation, at December 31, 2013

 

$

190,494

 

Applicable to net revenue (losses)

 

(8,781

)

Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses) allocated to the policyholder dividend obligation

 

119,502

 

Policyholder dividend obligation, end of period

 

$

301,215

 

 

 

Successor

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Company

 

 

Company

 

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Closed block liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Future policy benefits, policyholders’ account balances and other policyholder liabilities

 

$

6,105,857

 

 

$

6,138,505

 

Policyholder dividend obligation

 

251,458

 

 

366,745

 

Other liabilities

 

57,266

 

 

53,838

 

Total closed block liabilities

 

6,414,581

 

 

6,559,088

 

Closed block assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturities, available-for-sale, at fair value

 

$

4,588,002

 

 

$

4,524,037

 

Equity securities, available-for-sale, at fair value

 

 

 

5,387

 

Mortgage loans on real estate

 

427,624

 

 

448,855

 

Policy loans

 

761,749

 

 

771,120

 

Cash and other invested assets

 

56,536

 

 

30,984

 

Other assets

 

162,135

 

 

221,270

 

Total closed block assets

 

5,996,046

 

 

6,001,653

 

Excess of reported closed block liabilities over closed block assets

 

418,535

 

 

557,435

 

Portion of above representing accumulated other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net unrealized investments gains (losses) net of deferred tax benefit of $0 (2015 Successor), $0 (2015 Predecessor), and $0 (2014 Predecessor) net of policyholder dividend obligation of $(38,427) (2015 Successor), $194,686 (2015 Predecessor), and $106,886 (2014 Predecessor)

 

 

 

 

Future earnings to be recognized from closed block assets and closed block liabilities

 

$

418,535

 

 

$

557,435

 

 

1519



Table of Contents

 

Reconciliation of the policyholder dividend obligation is as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Policyholder dividend obligation, beginning of period

 

$

323,432

 

 

$

366,745

 

$

190,494

 

Applicable to net revenue (losses)

 

(12,855

)

 

(1,369

)

(6,680

)

Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses) allocated to policyholder dividend obligation

 

(59,119

)

 

135,077

 

70,267

 

Policyholder dividend obligation, end of period

 

$

251,458

 

 

$

500,453

 

$

254,081

 

Closed Block revenues and expenses were as follows:

 

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

September 30, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums and other income

 

$

48,596

 

$

151,442

 

Net investment income

 

63,847

 

176,470

 

Net investment gains

 

223

 

6,328

 

Total revenues

 

112,666

 

334,240

 

Benefits and other deduction

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

101,200

 

300,735

 

Other operating expenses

 

286

 

376

 

Total benefits and other deductions

 

101,486

 

301,111

 

Net revenues before income taxes

 

11,180

 

33,129

 

Income tax expense

 

3,913

 

11,595

 

Net revenues

 

$

7,267

 

$

21,534

 

5.PROPOSED DAI-ICHI MERGER

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Premiums and other income

 

$

31,460

 

 

$

15,065

 

$

50,066

 

Net investment income (loss)

 

32,848

 

 

19,107

 

52,207

 

Net investment gains (losses)

 

634

 

 

568

 

5,019

 

Total revenues

 

64,942

 

 

34,740

 

107,292

 

Benefits and other deductions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

55,771

 

 

31,152

 

96,326

 

Total benefits and other deductions

 

55,771

 

 

31,152

 

96,326

 

Net revenues before income taxes

 

9,171

 

 

3,588

 

10,966

 

Income tax expense

 

3,210

 

 

1,256

 

3,838

 

Net revenues

 

$

5,961

 

 

$

2,332

 

$

7,128

 

 

On June 3, 2014, PLC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with The Dai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Limited, a kabushiki kaisha organized under the laws of Japan (“Dai-ichi”) and DL Investment (Delaware), Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Dai-ichi which provides for the merger of DL Investment (Delaware), Inc. with and into PLC (the “Merger”), with PLC surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Dai-ichi.

PLC’s Board of Directors unanimously (1) determined that the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement are fair to, advisable and in the best interests of, PLC and its shareowners, (2) approved the execution, delivery and performance of the Merger Agreement by PLC and the consummation of the Merger and the other transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement, and (3) resolved to recommend the approval and adoption of the Merger Agreement and the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement by the shareowners of PLC. The Board of Directors received an opinion as to the fairness of the Merger consideration to be received by the shareowners of PLC from its financial advisor, Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC related to the terms of the Merger Agreement.

If the proposed Merger is completed, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of PLC’s common stock, par value $0.50 per share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, other than certain excluded shares, will be converted into the right to receive $70 in cash, without interest (the “Per Share Merger Consideration”). Shares of common stock held by Dai-ichi or PLC or their respective direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries will not be entitled to receive the Merger Consideration.

Completion of the Merger is subject to various closing conditions, including, but not limited to, (1) adoption of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of all outstanding shares of PLC’s common stock, which adoption was approved at a Special Meeting of Shareholders held on October 6, 2014, (2) requisite approval of the Japan Financial Services Agency of an application and notification filing by Dai-ichi and its affiliates, (3) the receipt of certain insurance regulatory approvals, (4) the absence of any laws that have been adopted or promulgated, or any order, injunction, decision or decree issued or remaining in effect, that would prohibit the Merger or make the Merger illegal, and (5) the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, which waiting period terminated on July 25, 2014, pursuant to a grant of early termination by the Federal Trade Commission. Each party’s obligation to consummate the Merger also is subject to certain additional conditions that include the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties contained in the Merger Agreement (subject to certain materiality qualifiers) and the other party’s compliance with its covenants and agreements contained in the Merger Agreement in all material respects. The Merger Agreement does not contain a financing condition.

1620



Table of Contents

 

The Merger Agreement contains representations and warranties customary for transactions of this type. PLC has agreed to various customary covenants and agreements, including, among others, agreements to conduct its business in the ordinary course during the period between the execution of the Merger Agreement and the Effective Time, and not to engage in certain kinds of transactions during this period. In addition, and subject to certain limitations, either party may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger is not consummated by February 28, 2015, which date is extended until April 30, 2015 in the event of delays in obtaining regulatory approval.

6.5.                                      INVESTMENT OPERATIONS

 

Net realized gains (losses) for all other investments are summarized as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Fixed maturities

 

$

22,244

 

$

10,546

 

$

49,812

 

$

42,136

 

 

$

373

 

 

$

6,891

 

$

7,370

 

Equity securities

 

 

 

 

2,367

 

 

 

 

 

 

Impairments on fixed maturity securities

 

(2,354

)

(7,421

)

(5,405

)

(13,918

)

 

 

 

(481

)

(1,591

)

Impairments on equity securities

 

 

(1,260

)

 

(3,347

)

 

 

 

 

 

Modco trading portfolio

 

(17,225

)

(25,960

)

110,067

 

(167,982

)

 

(33,160

)

 

73,062

 

66,303

 

Other investments

 

(5,135

)

(3,854

)

(7,383

)

(10,262

)

 

(2,269

)

 

1,200

 

(1,527

)

Total realized gains (losses) - investments

 

$

(2,470

)

$

(27,949

)

$

147,091

 

$

(151,006

)

 

$

(35,056

)

 

$

80,672

 

$

70,555

 

 

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), gross realized gains on investments available-for-sale (fixed maturities, equity securities, and short-term investments) were $22.5 million and $50.6$1.5 million and gross realized losses were $2.5  million and $5.9 million, including $2.3 million and $5.1 million of impairment losses, respectively.

$1.1 million. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013,period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), gross realized gains on investments available-for-sale (fixed maturities, equity securities, and short-term investments) were $11.7 million and $48.5$6.9 million and gross realized losses were $9.6 million and $20.6$0.5 million, including $8.5 million and $16.7$0.4 million of impairment losses, respectively.losses.

 

For the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), gross realized gains on investments available-for-sale (fixed maturities, equity securities, and short-term investments) were $7.6 million and gross realized losses were $1.8 million, including $1.6 million of impairment losses.

For the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company sold securities in an unrealized gain position with a fair value (proceeds) of $494.0 million and $1.1 billion, respectively.$282.9 million. The gain realized on the sale of these securities was $22.5 million and $50.6 million, respectively.

$1.5 million. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013,period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), the Company sold securities in an unrealized gain position with a fair value (proceeds) of $332.1 million and $1.1 billion, respectively.$172.6 million. The gain realized on the sale of these securities was $11.7 million and $48.5 million, respectively.$6.9 million.

 

For the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), the Company sold securities in an unrealized gain position with a fair value (proceeds) of $264.7 million. The gain realized on the sale of these securities was $7.6 million.

For the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company sold securities in an unrealized loss position with a fair value (proceeds) of $2.3 million and $6.7 million, respectively.$20.7 million. The lossesloss realized on the sale of these securities were $0.3 million and $0.8 million, respectively. These securities were sold in conjunction with the Company’s overall asset liability management process.

was $1.1 million. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013,period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), the Company sold securities in an unrealized loss position with a fair value (proceeds) of $7.0 million and $64.2 million, respectively.$0.4 million. The lossesCompany made the decision to exit these holdings in conjunction with our overall asset liability management process.

For the three months ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), the Company sold securities in an unrealized loss position with a fair value (proceeds) of $2.7 million. The loss realized on the sale of these securities were $1.1 million and $4.0 million, respectively. These securities were soldwas $0.3 million. The Company made the decision to exit these holdings in conjunction with the Company’sour overall asset liability management process.

 

1721



Table of Contents

 

The amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s investments classified as available-for-sale as of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), are as follows:

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Gross

 

 

 

Total OTTI

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Gross

 

 

 

Total OTTI

 

As of March 31, 2015

 

Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Recognized

 

(Successor Company)

 

Cost

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

Value

 

in OCI(1)

 

 

Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Recognized

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

Cost

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

Value

 

in OCI(1)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

1,405,611

 

$

51,344

 

$

(14,116

)

$

1,442,839

 

$

7,945

 

 

$

1,561,365

 

$

5,648

 

$

(5,746

)

$

1,561,267

 

$

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

1,137,642

 

43,744

 

(5,863

)

1,175,523

 

 

 

1,199,039

 

1,232

 

(5,431

)

1,194,840

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

869,136

 

13,476

 

(34,273

)

848,339

 

(105

)

 

824,614

 

1,832

 

(10,282

)

816,164

 

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

1,563,337

 

43,178

 

(22,305

)

1,584,210

 

 

 

1,649,513

 

1,499

 

(13,976

)

1,637,036

 

 

Other government-related securities

 

19,004

 

3,016

 

 

22,020

 

1

 

 

19,516

 

 

(312

)

19,204

 

 

States, municipals, and political subdivisions

 

1,371,113

 

243,943

 

(2,349

)

1,612,707

 

 

 

1,722,255

 

584

 

(44,750

)

1,678,089

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

25,006,020

 

2,498,860

 

(117,362

)

27,387,518

 

 

Corporate securities

 

28,243,846

 

104,239

 

(561,979

)

27,786,106

 

 

Preferred stock

 

64,362

 

72

 

(690

)

63,744

 

 

 

31,371,863

 

2,897,561

 

(196,268

)

34,073,156

 

7,841

 

 

35,284,510

 

115,106

 

(643,166

)

34,756,450

 

 

Equity securities

 

722,684

 

31,185

 

(16,495

)

737,374

 

 

 

694,926

 

4,483

 

(2,158

)

697,251

 

 

Short-term investments

 

102,976

 

 

 

102,976

 

 

 

175,072

 

 

 

175,072

 

 

 

$

32,197,523

 

$

2,928,746

 

$

(212,763

)

$

34,913,506

 

$

7,841

 

 

$

36,154,508

 

$

119,589

 

$

(645,324

)

$

35,628,773

 

$

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bonds

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

1,435,349

 

$

34,255

 

$

(24,536

)

$

1,445,068

 

$

979

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

963,461

 

26,900

 

(19,705

)

970,656

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

926,396

 

15,135

 

(69,548

)

871,983

 

(51

)

U.S. government-related securities

 

1,529,818

 

32,150

 

(54,078

)

1,507,890

 

 

Other government-related securities

 

49,171

 

2,257

 

(1

)

51,427

 

 

States, municipals, and political subdivisions

 

1,315,457

 

103,663

 

(8,291

)

1,410,829

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

24,630,156

 

1,510,233

 

(391,813

)

25,748,576

 

 

 

30,849,808

 

1,724,593

 

(567,972

)

32,006,429

 

928

 

Equity securities

 

611,473

 

6,068

 

(36,332

)

581,209

 

 

Short-term investments

 

80,582

 

 

 

80,582

 

 

 

$

31,541,863

 

$

1,730,661

 

$

(604,304

)

$

32,668,220

 

$

928

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Predecessor Company)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

1,374,141

 

$

56,381

 

$

(12,264

)

$

1,418,258

 

$

6,404

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

1,119,979

 

59,637

 

(2,364

)

1,177,252

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

857,365

 

17,961

 

(35,950

)

839,376

 

(95

)

U.S. government-related securities

 

1,394,028

 

44,149

 

(9,282

)

1,428,895

 

 

Other government-related securities

 

16,939

 

3,233

 

 

20,172

 

 

States, municipals, and political subdivisions

 

1,391,526

 

296,594

 

(431

)

1,687,689

 

 

Corporate securities

 

24,744,050

 

2,760,703

 

(138,975

)

27,365,778

 

 

 

 

30,898,028

 

3,238,658

 

(199,266

)

33,937,420

 

6,309

 

Equity securities

 

713,813

 

35,646

 

(14,153

)

735,306

 

 

Short-term investments

 

151,572

 

 

 

151,572

 

 

 

 

$

31,763,413

 

$

3,274,304

 

$

(213,419

)

$

34,824,298

 

$

6,309

 

 


(1)These amounts are included in the gross unrealized gains and gross unrealized losses columns above.

The preferred stock shown above as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) is included in the equity securities total as of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company).

22



Table of Contents

 

The amortized cost and fair value of the Company’s investments classified as held-to-maturity as of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), are as follows:

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Gross

 

 

 

Total OTTI

 

As of March 31, 2015

 

Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Recognized

 

Successor Company

 

Cost

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

Value

 

in OCI

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Fixed maturities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

$

551,320

 

$

 

$

(22,492

)

$

528,828

 

$

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Gross

 

 

 

Total OTTI

 

 

$

551,320

 

$

 

$

(22,492

)

$

528,828

 

$

 

 

Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Recognized

 

 

 

Cost

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

Value

 

in OCI

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

$

415,000

 

$

38,741

 

$

 

$

453,741

 

$

 

 

$

415,000

 

$

38,741

 

$

 

$

453,741

 

$

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

$

365,000

 

$

 

$

(29,324

)

$

335,676

 

$

 

 

$

365,000

 

$

 

$

(29,324

)

$

335,676

 

$

 

 

18



Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Predecessor Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

$

435,000

 

$

50,422

 

$

 

$

485,422

 

$

 

 

 

$

435,000

 

$

50,422

 

$

 

$

485,422

 

$

 

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and the yearperiod ended DecemberMarch 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), the Company did not record any other-than-temporary impairments on held-to-maturity securities. The Company’s held-to-maturity securities had no$22.5 million of gross unrecognized holding losses for the period ended September 30, 2014 and $29.3 million for the year ended Decemberas of March 31, 2013.2015 (Successor Company).  The Company does not consider these unrecognized holding losses to be other-than-temporary based on certain positive factors associated with the securities which include credit ratings, financial health of the issuer, continued access of the issuer to capital markets and other pertinent informationinformation.

The Company’s held-to-maturity securities had no gross unrecognized holding losses as of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

As of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), the Company had an additional $2.8$2.9 billion and $2.8 billion of fixed maturities, $24.1$4.0 million and $21.2$21.5 million of equity securities, and $75.3$71.5 million and $52.4$95.1 million of short-term investments classified as trading securities, respectively.

 

The amortized cost and fair value of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity fixed maturities as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), by expected maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities of securities without a single maturity date are allocated based on estimated rates of prepayment that may differ from actual rates of prepayment.

 

 

Successor Company

 

 

Available-for-sale

 

Held-to-maturity

 

 

Available-for-sale

 

Held-to-maturity

 

 

Amortized

 

Fair

 

Amortized

 

Fair

 

 

Amortized

 

Fair

 

Amortized

 

Fair

 

 

Cost

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Value

 

 

Cost

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Value

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Due in one year or less

 

$

1,043,243

 

$

1,057,235

 

$

 

$

 

 

$

891,374

 

$

891,238

 

$

 

$

 

Due after one year through five years

 

4,532,064

 

4,824,318

 

 

 

 

5,127,431

 

5,127,341

 

 

 

Due after five years through ten years

 

8,876,101

 

9,336,733

 

 

 

 

8,823,117

 

8,782,413

 

 

 

Due after ten years

 

16,920,455

 

18,854,870

 

415,000

 

453,741

 

 

20,442,588

 

19,955,458

 

551,320

 

528,828

 

 

$

31,371,863

 

$

34,073,156

 

$

415,000

 

$

453,741

 

 

$

35,284,510

 

$

34,756,450

 

$

551,320

 

$

528,828

 

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company recordeddid not record any pre-tax other-than-temporary impairments of investments of $1.1 million and $2.0 million, all of which related to fixed maturities, respectively. Credit impairments recorded in earnings during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 were $2.3 million and $5.4 million, respectively. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, $1.2 million and $3.4 million of non-credit losses previously recorded in other comprehensive income were recorded in earnings as credit losses, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, thereinvestments. There were no other-than-temporary impairments related to fixed maturities or equity securities that the Company intended to sell or expected to be required to sell.sell for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

23



Table of Contents

 

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013,period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), the Company recorded pre-tax other-than-temporary impairments of investments of $6.7$0.6 million, and $9.8 million,all of which $5.4 million and $6.4  million related to fixed maturities and $1.3 million and $3.4 million related to equity securities, respectively.maturities. Credit impairments recorded in earnings during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013period were $8.7 million and $17.3 million, respectively.$0.5 million. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, $2.0 million and $7.5period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), $0.1 million of non-credit losses previously recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) were recorded in earnings as credit losses, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, therelosses. There were no other-than-temporary impairments related to fixed maturities or equity securities that the Company intended to sell or expected to be required to sell.sell for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company).

 

19



TableDuring the three months ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), the Company recorded pre-tax other-than-temporary impairments of Contentsinvestments of $0.4 million, all of which related to fixed maturities. Credit impairments recorded in earnings during the period were $1.6 million. During the three months ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), $1.2 million of non-credit losses previously recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) were recorded in earnings as credit losses. There were no other-than-temporary impairments related to fixed maturities or equity securities that the Company intended to sell or expected to be required to sell for the three months ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

The following chart is a rollforward of available-for-sale credit losses on fixed maturities held by the Company for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairments wereimpairment was recognized in other comprehensive income (loss):

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Beginning balance

 

$

17,938

 

$

51,814

 

$

41,674

 

$

121,237

 

 

$

 

 

$

15,463

 

$

41,674

 

Additions for newly impaired securities

 

 

1,663

 

 

3,278

 

 

 

 

 

 

Additions for previously impaired securities

 

626

 

4,840

 

1,653

 

7,894

 

 

 

 

221

 

474

 

Reductions for previously impaired securities due to a change in expected cash flows

 

(3,640

)

(6,537

)

(28,403

)

(73,392

)

 

 

 

 

(21,356

)

Reductions for previously impaired securities that were sold in the current period

 

 

 

 

(7,237

)

 

 

 

 

 

Ending balance

 

$

14,924

 

$

51,780

 

$

14,924

 

$

51,780

 

 

$

 

 

$

15,684

 

$

20,792

 

 

The following table includes the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

 

 

Less Than 12 Months

 

12 Months or More

 

Total

 

 

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

Value

 

Loss

 

Value

 

Loss

 

Value

 

Loss

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

148,721

 

$

(7,759

)

$

88,407

 

$

(6,357

)

$

237,128

 

$

(14,116

)

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

123,244

 

(1,534

)

124,578

 

(4,329

)

247,822

 

(5,863

)

Other asset-backed securities

 

109,657

 

(5,537

)

551,045

 

(28,736

)

660,702

 

(34,273

)

U.S. government-related securities

 

374,160

 

(7,835

)

348,899

 

(14,470

)

723,059

 

(22,305

)

Other government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States, municipalities, and political subdivisions

 

880

 

(6

)

40,936

 

(2,343

)

41,816

 

(2,349

)

Corporate bonds

 

2,218,375

 

(54,092

)

995,498

 

(63,270

)

3,213,873

 

(117,362

)

Equities

 

90,797

 

(1,305

)

128,255

 

(15,190

)

219,052

 

(16,495

)

 

 

$

3,065,834

 

$

(78,068

)

$

2,277,618

 

$

(134,695

)

$

5,343,452

 

$

(212,763

)

RMBS have a gross unrealized loss greater than twelve months of $6.4 million as of September 30, 2014. Factors such as the credit enhancement within the deal structure, the average life of the securities, and the performance of the underlying collateral support the recoverability of these investments.

CMBS have a gross unrealized loss greater than twelve months of $4.3 million as of September 30, 2014. Factors such as the credit enhancement within the deal structure, the average life of the securities, and the performance of the underlying collateral support the recoverability of these investments.

The other asset-backed securities have a gross unrealized loss greater than twelve months of $28.7 million as of September 30, 2014. This category predominately includes student-loan backed auction rate securities, the underlying collateral, of which is at least 97% guaranteed by the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”). These unrealized losses have occurred within the Company’s auction rate securities (“ARS”) portfolio since the market collapse during 2008. At this time, the Company has no reason to believe that the U.S. Department of Education would not honor the FFELP guarantee, if it were necessary.

The U.S. government-related category has gross unrealized losses greater than twelve months of $14.5 million as of September 30, 2014. These declines were entirely related to changes in interest rates.

 

 

Less Than 12 Months

 

12 Months or More

 

Total

 

 

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

 

 

Value

 

Loss

 

Value

 

Loss

 

Value

 

Loss

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

834,640

 

$

(5,746

)

$

 

$

 

$

834,640

 

$

(5,746

)

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

941,676

 

(5,431

)

 

 

941,676

 

(5,431

)

Other asset-backed securities

 

724,228

 

(10,282

)

 

 

724,228

 

(10,282

)

U.S. government-related securities

 

1,303,006

 

(13,976

)

 

 

1,303,006

 

(13,976

)

Other government-related securities

 

19,204

 

(312

)

 

 

19,204

 

(312

)

States, municipalities, and political subdivisions

 

1,650,969

 

(44,750

)

 

 

1,650,969

 

(44,750

)

Corporate securities

 

21,217,361

 

(561,979

)

 

 

21,217,361

 

(561,979

)

Preferred stock

 

30,180

 

(690

)

 

 

30,180

 

(690

)

Equities

 

283,487

 

(2,158

)

 

 

283,487

 

(2,158

)

 

 

$

27,004,751

 

$

(645,324

)

$

 

$

 

$

27,004,751

 

$

(645,324

)

 

2024



Table of Contents

 

The corporate bonds category has gross unrealized losses less than and greater than twelve months of $54.1 million and $63.3 million, respectively,preferred stock shown above as of September 30, 2014. These declines were primarily related to changesMarch 31, 2015 (Successor Company) is included in interest rates during the period. The aggregate decline in market valueequity securities total as of these securities was deemed temporary due to positive factors supporting the recoverability of the respective investments. Positive factors considered include credit ratings, the financial health of the issuer, the continued access of the issuer to capital markets, and other pertinent information.December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

The equities category has a gross unrealized loss greater than twelve monthsbook value of $15.2 millionthe Company’s investment portfolio was marked to fair value as of September 30, 2014.February 1, 2015 (Successor Company), in conjunction with the Dai-ichi Merger which resulted in the elimination of previously unrealized gains and losses from accumulated other comprehensive income. The aggregate declinelevel of interest rates as of February 1, 2015 (Successor Company) resulted in marketan increase in the fair value of these securities was deemed temporary due to factors supporting the recoverability ofCompany’s investments. Since February 1, 2015 (Successor Company) interest rates have increased resulting in net unrealized losses in the respective investments. Positive factors include credit ratings, the financial health of the issuer, the continued access of the issuer to the capital markets, and other pertinent information.Company’s investment portfolio.

 

The Company does not consider these unrealized loss positions to be other-than-temporary, based on the aggregate factors discussed previously and because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until the fair values recover, and does not intend to sell or expect to be required to sell the securities before recovering the Company’s amortized cost of the securities.

 

The following table includes the gross unrealized losses and fair value of the Company’s investments that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2013:2014 (Predecessor Company):

 

 

Less Than 12 Months

 

12 Months or More

 

Total

 

 

Less Than 12 Months

 

12 Months or More

 

Total

 

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

Fair

 

Unrealized

 

 

Value

 

Loss

 

Value

 

Loss

 

Value

 

Loss

 

 

Value

 

Loss

 

Value

 

Loss

 

Value

 

Loss

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

332,812

 

$

(14,050

)

$

209,818

 

$

(10,486

)

$

542,630

 

$

(24,536

)

 

$

165,877

 

$

(9,547

)

$

67,301

 

$

(2,717

)

$

233,178

 

$

(12,264

)

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

429,228

 

(18,467

)

13,840

 

(1,238

)

443,068

 

(19,705

)

 

49,908

 

(334

)

102,529

 

(2,030

)

152,437

 

(2,364

)

Other asset-backed securities

 

175,846

 

(14,555

)

497,512

 

(54,993

)

673,358

 

(69,548

)

 

108,665

 

(6,473

)

537,488

 

(29,477

)

646,153

 

(35,950

)

U.S. government-related securities

 

891,698

 

(53,508

)

6,038

 

(570

)

897,736

 

(54,078

)

 

231,917

 

(3,868

)

280,803

 

(5,414

)

512,720

 

(9,282

)

Other government-related securities

 

10,161

 

(1

)

 

 

10,161

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States, municipalities, and political subdivisions

 

172,157

 

(8,113

)

335

 

(178

)

172,492

 

(8,291

)

 

1,905

 

(134

)

10,481

 

(297

)

12,386

 

(431

)

Corporate bonds

 

7,480,163

 

(353,069

)

271,535

 

(38,744

)

7,751,698

 

(391,813

)

Corporate securities

 

1,657,103

 

(76,285

)

776,863

 

(62,690

)

2,433,966

 

(138,975

)

Equities

 

376,776

 

(27,861

)

21,764

 

(8,471

)

398,540

 

(36,332

)

 

17,430

 

(218

)

129,509

 

(13,935

)

146,939

 

(14,153

)

 

$

9,868,841

 

$

(489,624

)

$

1,020,842

 

$

(114,680

)

$

10,889,683

 

$

(604,304

)

 

$

2,232,805

 

$

(96,859

)

$

1,904,974

 

$

(116,560

)

$

4,137,779

 

$

(213,419

)

 

RMBS had a gross unrealized loss greater than twelve months of $10.5$2.7 million as of December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company). Factors such as the credit enhancement within the deal structure, the average life of the securities, and the performance of the underlying collateral support the recoverability of these investments.

 

CMBS had a gross unrealized loss greater than twelve months of $1.2$2.0 million as of December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company). Factors such as the credit enhancement within the deal structure, the average life of the securities, and the performance of the underlying collateral support the recoverability of these investments.

 

The other asset-backed securities had a gross unrealized loss greater than twelve months of $55.0$29.5 million as of December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company). This category predominately includes student-loan backed auction rate securities, the underlying collateral, of which is at least 97% guaranteed by the FFELP.Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”). These unrealized losses have occurred within the Company’s ARSauction rate securities (“ARS”) portfolio since the market collapse during 2008. At this time, the Company has no reason to believe that the U.S. Department of Education would not honor the FFELP guarantee, if it were necessary.

 

The corporate bondsU.S. government-related category had gross unrealized losses less than and greater than twelve months of $353.1$5.4 million and $38.7 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company). These declines were primarilyentirely related to changes in interest rates during the period.rates.

The corporate securities category had gross unrealized losses greater than twelve months of $62.7 million as of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company). The aggregate decline in market value of these securities was deemed temporary due to positive factorfactors supporting the recoverability of the respective investments. Positive factors

25



Table of Contents

considered include credit ratings, the financial health of the issuer, the continued access of the issuer to capital markets, and other pertinent information.

 

21



Table of Contents

The equities category had a gross unrealized loss greater than twelve months of $8.5$14.0 million as of December 31, 2013.2014(Predecessor Company). The aggregate decline in market value of these securities was deemed temporary due to factors supporting the recoverability of the respective investments. Positive factors include credit ratings, the financial health of the issuer, the continued access of the issuer to the capital markets, and other pertinent information.

 

The Company does not consider these unrealized loss positions to be other-than-temporary, based on the aggregate factors discussed previously and because the Company has the ability and intent to hold these investments until the fair values recover, and does not intend to sell or expect to be required to sell the securities before recovering the Company’s amortized cost of the securities.

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company had securities in its available-for-sale portfolio which were rated below investment grade of $1.7 billion and had an amortized cost of $1.6$1.7 billion. In addition, included in the Company’s trading portfolio, the Company held $322.6$317.3 million of securities which were rated below investment grade. Approximately $785.5$447.8  million of the below investment grade securities were not publicly traded.traded

 

The change in unrealized gains (losses), net of income tax, on fixed maturity and equity securities, classified as available-for-sale is summarized as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Fixed maturities

 

$

(143,278

)

$

(155,839

)

$

1,004,483

 

$

(1,175,521

)

 

$

(343,239

)

 

$

669,160

 

$

628,272

 

Equity securities

 

(3,784

)

(12,791

)

29,220

 

(17,393

)

 

1,511

 

 

12,172

 

18,413

 

 

Variable Interest Entities

 

The Company holds certain investments in entities in which its ownership interests could possibly be considered variable interests under Topic 810 of the FASB ASCFinancial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC” or “Codification”) (excluding debt and equity securities held as trading, available-for-sale,available for sale, or held-to-maturity)held to maturity). The Company reviews the characteristics of each of these applicable entities and compares those characteristics to applicable criteria to determine whether the entity is a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”). If the entity is determined to be a VIE, the Company then performs a detailed review to determine whether the interest would be considered a variable interest under the guidance. The Company then performs a qualitative review of all variable interests with the entity and determines whether the Company is the primary beneficiary. ASC 810 provides that an entity is the primary beneficiary of a VIE if the entity has 1) the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance, and 2) the obligation to absorb losses of the VIE that could potentially be significant to the VIE or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE.

 

Based on this analysis, the Company had an interest in one wholly owned subsidiary, Red Mountain, LLC (“Red Mountain”), that continuedwas determined to be classified as a VIE as of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company). The activity most significant to Red Mountain is the issuance of a note in connection with a financing transaction involving Golden Gate V Vermont Captive Insurance Company (“Golden Gate V”) and the Company in which Golden Gate V issued non-recourse funding obligations to Red Mountain and Red Mountain issued the note to Golden Gate V. Credit enhancement on the Red Mountain Note is provided by an unrelated third party. For details of this transaction, see Note 9, Debt and Other Obligations. The Company had the power, via its 100% ownership through an affiliate, to direct the activities of the VIE, but did not have the obligation to absorb losses related to the primary risks or sources of variability to the VIE. The variability of loss would be borne primarily by the third party in its function as provider of credit enhancement on the Red Mountain Note. Accordingly, it was determined that the Company is not the primary beneficiary of the VIE. The Company’s risk of loss related to the VIE is limited to its

26



Table of Contents

investment of $10,000. Additionally, PLCthe Company has guaranteed the VIE’s payment obligation for the credit enhancement fee to the unrelated third party provider. As of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), no payments have been made or required related to this guarantee.

22



Table of Contents

7.6.                                      MORTGAGE LOANS

 

Mortgage Loans

 

The Company invests a portion of its investment portfolio in commercial mortgage loans. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company’s mortgage loan holdings were approximately $5.2$5.6 billion. The Company has specialized in making loans on either credit-oriented commercial properties or credit-anchored strip shopping centers and apartments. The Company’s underwriting procedures relative to its commercial loan portfolio are based, in the Company’s view, on a conservative and disciplined approach. The Company concentrates on a small number of commercial real estate asset types associated with the necessities of life (retail, multi-family, senior living, professional office buildings, and warehouses). The Company believes that these asset types tend to weather economic downturns better than other commercial asset classes in which it has chosen not to participate. The Company believes this disciplined approach has helped to maintain a relatively low delinquency and foreclosure rate throughout its history. The majority of the Company’s mortgage loans portfolio was underwritten and funded by the Company. From time to time, the Company may acquire loans in conjunction with an acquisition.

 

The Company’s commercial mortgage loans are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount, and net of valuation allowances. Interest income is accrued on the principal amount of the loan based on the loan’s contractual interest rate. Amortization of premiums and discounts is recorded using the effective yield method. Interest income, amortization of premiums and discounts and prepayment fees are reported in net investment income.

 

As of February 1, 2015 all mortgage loans were measured at fair value. Each mortgage loan was individually analyzed to determine the fair value. Each loan was either analyzed and assigned a discount rate or given an impairment, based on whether facts and circumstances which, as of the acquisition date, indicated less than full projected collections of contractual principal and interest payments. Various market factors were considered in determining the net present value of the expected cash flow stream or underlying real estate collateral, including the characteristics of the borrower, the underlying collateral, underlying credit worthiness of the tenants, and tenant payment history. Known events and risks, such as refinancing risks, were also considered in the fair value determination. In certain cases, fair value was based on the NPV of the expected cash flow stream or the underlying value of the real estate collateral.

Certain of the Company’s mortgage loans have call options or interest rate reset options between 3 and 10 years. However, if interest rates were to significantly increase, the Companywe may be unable to exercise the call options or increase the interest rates on itsour existing mortgage loans commensurate with the significantly increased market rates. Assuming the loans are with these options called at their next call dates, approximately $29.9$168.8 million would become due for the remainder of 2014, $1.1 billion in 2015 through 2019, $510.0(Successor Company), $950.4 million in 2016 through 2020, $381.2 million in 2021 through 2024,2025, and $129.3$119.6 million thereafter.thereafter.

 

The Company offers a type of commercial mortgage loan under which the Company will permit a loan-to-value ratio of up to 85% in exchange for a participating interest in the cash flows from the underlying real estate. As of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), approximately $583.4$536.0 million and $666.6$553.6 million, respectively, of the Company’s mortgage loans have this participation feature. Cash flows received as a result of this participation feature are recorded as interest income. During the period of February 1 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and for the three and nine month periodsmonths ended September 30,March 31, 2014 and 2013,(Predecessor Company), the Company recognized $8.0$1.8 million, $13.8 million, $3.7$0.1 million, and $12.9$3.0 million, respectively, of participating mortgage loan income.

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), approximately $34.0$20.5 million, or 0.07%0.04%, of invested assets consisted of nonperforming, restructured or mortgage loans that were foreclosed and were converted to real estate properties. The Company does not expect these investments to adversely affect its liquidity or ability to maintain proper matching of assets and liabilities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), the Company entered into certain mortgage

27



Table of Contents

loan transactions occurred that were accounted for as troubled debt restructurings under Topic 310 of the FASB ASC. For all mortgage loans, the impact of troubled debt restructurings is generally reflected in ourthe Company’s investment balance and in the allowance for mortgage loan credit losses. Transactions accounted for as troubled debt restructurings during the quarterperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) included either the acceptance of assets in satisfaction of principal during the respective periods or at a future date, or the recognition of permanent impairments to principal, and were the result of agreements between the creditor and the debtor. During the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company accepted or agreed to accept assets of $11.2 million and $26.3$10.6 million in satisfaction of $14.6 million and $30.6$13.2 million of principal respectively. Theand for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), the Company accepted or agreed to accept assets of $11.3 million in satisfaction of $13.8 million of principal. These transactions resulted in no material realized losses in the Company’s investment in mortgage loans net of existing discounts recorded for mortgage loans losses for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). In the third quarter of 2014, the Company also identified one loan whose principal of $12.6 million was permanently impaired to a value of $7.3 million. These transactionsThis transaction resulted in arealized losses of $5.3 million and $6.2 milliona decrease in the Company’s investment in mortgage loans net of existing allowances for mortgage loansloan losses. Of the mortgage loan transactions accounted for as troubled debt restructurings, $21.8 million remain on the Company’s balance sheet as of September 30, 2014.

 

The Company’s mortgage loan portfolio consists of two categories of loans: (1)1) those not subject to a pooling and servicing agreement and (2)2) those subject to a contractual pooling and servicing agreement. As of September 30,

23



Table of Contents

2014, $34.0March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), $20.5 million of mortgage loans not subject to a pooling and servicing agreement were nonperforming or restructured; $21.8 millionrestructured. None of these nonperformingthe restructured loans were restructurednonperforming during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.periods of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), respectively. The Company did not foreclose on any nonperforming loans not subject to a pooling and servicing agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.periods of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), respectively.

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), none of the loans subject to a pooling and servicing agreement were nonperforming. The Company did not foreclose on any nonperforming loans subject to pooling and servicing agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.periods of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company).

 

As of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), the Company had an allowance for mortgage loan credit losses of $3.7$1.2 million and $3.1$5.7 million, respectively. Due to the Company’s loss experience and nature of the loan portfolio, the Company believes that a collectively evaluated allowance would be inappropriate. The Company believes an allowance calculated through an analysis of specific loans that are believed to have a higher risk of credit impairment provides a more accurate presentation of expected losses in the portfolio and is consistent with the applicable guidance for loan impairments in ASC Subtopic 310. Since the Company uses the specific identification method for calculating the allowance, it is necessary to review the economic situation of each borrower to determine those that have higher risk of credit impairment. The Company has a team of professionals that monitors borrower conditions such as payment practices, borrower credit, operating performance, and property conditions, as well as ensuring the timely payment of property taxes and insurance. Through this monitoring process, the Company assesses the risk of each loan. When issues are identified, the severity of the issues are assessed and reviewed for possible credit impairment. If a loss is probable, an expected loss calculation is performed and an allowance is established for that loan based on the expected loss. The expected loss is calculated as the excess carrying value of a loan over either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s original effective interest rate, or the current estimated fair value of the loan’s underlying collateral. A loan may be subsequently charged off at such point that the Company no longer expects to receive cash payments, the present value of future expected payments of the renegotiated loan is less than the current principal balance, or at such time that the Company is party to foreclosure or bankruptcy proceedings associated with the borrower and does not expect to recover the principal balance of the loan.

 

28



Table of Contents

A charge off is recorded by eliminating the allowance against the mortgage loan and recording the renegotiated loan or the collateral property related to the loan as investment real estate on the balance sheet, which is carried at the lower of the appraised fair value of the property or the unpaid principal balance of the loan, less estimated selling costs associated with the property:

 

 

Successor 

 

Predecessor

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

 

 

 

As of

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

As of

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Beginning balance

 

$

3,130

 

$

2,875

 

 

$

 

 

$

5,720

 

$

3,130

 

Charge offs

 

(416

)

(6,838

)

 

 

 

(861

)

(675

)

Recoveries

 

(2,600

)

(1,016

)

 

 

 

(2,359

)

(2,600

)

Provision

 

3,536

 

8,109

 

 

1,171

 

 

 

5,865

 

Ending balance

 

$

3,650

 

$

3,130

 

 

$

  1,171

 

 

$

   2,500

 

$

   5,720

 

 

It is the Company’s policy to cease to carry accrued interest on loans that are over 90 days delinquent. For loans less than 90 days delinquent, interest is accrued unless it is determined that the accrued interest is not collectible. If a loan becomes over 90 days delinquent, it is the Company’s general policy to initiate foreclosure proceedings unless a workout arrangement to bring the loan current is in place. For loans subject to a pooling and servicing agreement, there are certain additional restrictions and/or requirements related to workout proceedings, and as such, these loans may have different attributes and/or circumstances affecting the status of delinquency or categorization of those in nonperforming status. An analysis of the delinquent loans is shown in the following chart as of September 30, 2014.:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greater

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Greater

 

 

 

 

30-59 Days

 

60-89 Days

 

than 90 Days

 

Total

 

 

Delinquent

 

Delinquent

 

Delinquent

 

Delinquent

 

As of March 31, 2015

 

30-59 Days

 

60-89 Days

 

than 90 Days

 

Total

 

Successor Company

 

Delinquent

 

Delinquent

 

Delinquent

 

Delinquent

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Commercial mortgage loans

 

$

15,104

 

$

1,659

 

$

10,502

 

$

27,265

 

 

$

8,321

 

$

4,913

 

$

1,973

 

$

15,207

 

Number of delinquent commercial mortgage loans

 

5

 

1

 

5

 

11

 

 

6

 

2

 

1

 

9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Predecessor Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage loans

 

$

8,972

 

$

 

$

1,484

 

$

10,456

 

Number of delinquent commercial mortgage loans

 

4

 

 

1

 

5

 

 

2429



Table of Contents

 

The Company’s commercial mortgage loan portfolio consists of mortgage loans that are collateralized by real estate. Due to the collateralized nature of the loans, any assessment of impairment and ultimate loss given a default on the loans is based upon a consideration of the estimated fair value of the real estate. The Company limits accrued interest income on impaired loans to 90 days of interest. Once accrued interest on the impaired loan is received, interest income is recognized on a cash basis. For information regarding impaired loans, please refer to the following chart as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:chart:

 

 

 

 

Unpaid

 

 

 

Average

 

Interest

 

Cash Basis

 

 

 

 

Unpaid

 

 

 

Average

 

Interest

 

Cash Basis

 

As of March 31, 2015

 

Recorded

 

Principal

 

Related

 

Recorded

 

Income

 

Interest

 

Successor Company

 

Investment

 

Balance

 

Allowance

 

Investment

 

Recognized

 

Income

 

 

Recorded

 

Principal

 

Related

 

Recorded

 

Income

 

Interest

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

Investment

 

Balance

 

Allowance

 

Investment

 

Recognized

 

Income

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With no related allowance recorded

 

$

6,045

 

$

7,558

 

$

 

$

1,511

 

$

 

$

 

 

$

10,147

 

$

12,847

 

$

 

$

2,537

 

$

102

 

$

122

 

With an allowance recorded

 

16,054

 

16,043

 

3,650

 

3,211

 

187

 

187

 

 

3,078

 

4,198

 

1,171

 

1,539

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Predecessor Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage loans:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

With no related allowance recorded

 

$

2,208

 

$

2,208

 

$

 

$

2,208

 

$

31

 

$

 

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

With an allowance recorded

 

21,288

 

21,281

 

3,130

 

5,322

 

304

 

304

 

 

19,632

 

20,603

 

5,720

 

3,272

 

1,224

 

1,280

 

 

Mortgage loans that were modified in a troubled debt restructuring were as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Post-

 

 

 

 

Pre-Modification

 

Post-Modification

 

 

 

 

Pre-Modification

 

Modification

 

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

Outstanding

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

Number of

 

Recorded

 

Recorded

 

Predecessor Company

 

Contracts

 

Investment

 

Investment

 

 

 

 

Outstanding

 

Outstanding

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

Number of

 

Recorded

 

Recorded

 

 

Contracts

 

Investment

 

Investment

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Troubled debt restructuring:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage loans

 

5

 

$

27,164

 

$

21,848

 

 

6

 

$

28,648

 

$

19,593

 

30



Table of Contents

7.DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS AND VALUE OF BUSINESS ACQUIRED

Deferred policy acquisition costs

The balances and changes in DAC are as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Company

 

 

Company

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

As of

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

 

 

$

2,653,065

 

$

2,720,604

 

Capitalization of commissions, sales, and issue expenses

 

49,851

 

 

22,820

 

293,672

 

Amortization

 

(1,833

)

 

1,080

 

(194,517

)

Change in unrealized investment gains and losses

 

 

 

(96,830

)

(166,694

)

Balance, end of period

 

$

48,018

 

 

$

2,580,135

 

$

2,653,065

 

Value of business acquired

The balances and changes in VOBA are as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Company

 

 

Company

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

As of

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

1,278,063

 

 

501,981

 

756,018

 

Amortization

 

(26,203

)

 

(5,895

)

(113,803

)

Change in unrealized gains and losses

 

16,468

 

 

(79,417

)

(140,234

)

Balance, end of period

 

$

1,268,328

 

 

$

416,669

 

$

501,981

 

As of February 1, 2015, the existing DAC and VOBA balance was written off in conjunction with the merger previously disclosed in Note 5, Dai-ichi Merger and in accordance with ASC Topic 805 — Business Combinations.

Concurrently, a VOBA asset was created representing the actuarial estimated present value of future cash flows from the Company’s insurance policies and investment contracts in-force on the date of the Merger.

The expected amortization of VOBA for the next five years is as follows:

 

 

Expected

 

Years

 

Amortization

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

2015

 

$

111,538

 

2016

 

141,689

 

2017

 

131,556

 

2018

 

116,248

 

2019

 

97,335

 

31



Table of Contents

 

8.                                      GOODWILL

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014,period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), the Company decreased its goodwill balance by approximately $2.3$0.3 million. The decrease for the period of the Predecessor Company was due to an adjustment in the Acquisitions segment related to tax benefits realized during 2014the period on the portion of tax goodwill in excess of GAAP basis goodwill. The goodwill balances associated with the Predecessor Company were replaced with newly established goodwill balances in conjunction with the Dai-ichi Merger, in accordance with ASC Topic 850, as described below.

As permitted by ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations, the Company measured its assets and liabilities at fair value on the date of the merger, February 1, 2015. The purchase price in excess of the fair value of PLC’s assets and liabilities resulted in the establishment of goodwill as of the date of the merger. As of September 30, 2014,February 1, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company hadwas allocated an aggregate goodwill balance of $78.4$735.7 million. Refer to Note 3, Dai-ichi Merger, for more information related to the Successor Company goodwill. There has been no change in the goodwill during the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

 

Accounting for goodwill requires an estimate of the future profitability of the associated lines of business to assess the recoverability of the capitalized acquisition goodwill. The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill at the segment (or reporting unit) level at least annually and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to: 1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, 2) unanticipated competition, or 3) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. When evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, the Company first determines through qualitative analysis whether relevant events and circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that segment goodwill balances are impaired as of the testingmeasurement date. If it is determined that it is more likely than not that impairment exists, the Company compares its estimate of the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit’s carrying amount, including goodwill. The Company utilizes a fair value measurement (which includes a discounted cash flows analysis) to assess the carrying value of the reporting units in consideration of the recoverability of the goodwill balance assigned to each reporting unit as of the measurement date. The Company’s material goodwill balances are attributable to certain of its operating segments (which are each considered to be reporting units). The cash flows used to determine the fair value of the Company’s reporting units are dependent on a number of significant assumptions. The Company’s estimates, which

25



Table of Contents

consider a market participant view of fair value, are subject to change given the inherent uncertainty in predicting future results and cash flows, which are impacted by such things as policyholder behavior, competitor pricing, capital limitations, new product introductions, and specific industry and market conditions. Additionally, the discount rate used is based on the Company’s judgment of the appropriate rate for each reporting unit based on the relative risk associated with the projected cash flows. As of December 31, 2013, the Company performed its annual evaluation of goodwill and determined that no adjustment to impair goodwill was necessary. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, no events occurred which indicate an impairment was required or which would invalidate the previous results of the Company’s impairment assessment.

9.                                      DEBT AND OTHER OBLIGATIONS

 

In conjunction with the Merger and in accordance with ASC Topic 805, the Company adjusted the carrying value of its non-recourse funding obligations to fair value as of the date of the Merger, February 1, 2015. This resulted in the Company establishing premiums and discounts on its non-recourse funding obligations. The fair value of the Company’s non-recourse funding obligations associated with Golden Gate, Golden Gate II, and MONY Life Insurance Company, were determined using market prices as of February 1, 2015. The fair value of the Golden Gate V non-recourse funding obligation was determined using a discounted cash flow model with inputs derived from comparable financial instruments. The premiums and discounts established as of February 1, 2015 are amortized over the expected life of the instruments using the effective interest method. The amortization of premiums and discounts are recorded as a component of interest expense and are recorded in “Other operating expenses” on the Company’s Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income.

Under a revolving line of credit arrangement that was in effect until February 2, 2015 (the “Credit Facility”), the Company and PLC have access to a Credit Facility that provideshad the ability to borrow on an unsecured basis up to an aggregate principal amount of $750 million. The Company hashad the right in certain circumstances to request that the commitment under the Credit Facility be increased up to a maximum principal amount of $1.0 billion. Balances outstanding under the Credit Facility accrueaccrued interest at a rate equal to, at the option of the Borrowers, (i) LIBOR plus a spread based on the ratings of PLC’s senior unsecured long-term debt (“Senior Debt”), or (ii) the sum of (A) a rate equal to the highest of (x) the Administrative Agent’s prime rate, (y) 0.50% above the Federal Funds rate, or (z) the one-month LIBOR plus 1.00% and (B) a spread based on the ratings of PLC’s Senior Debt. The Credit Facility also providesprovided for a facility fee at a rate, 0.175%, that variescould vary with the ratings of PLC’s Senior Debt and that iswas calculated on the aggregate amount of commitments under the Credit Facility, whether used or unused. The Credit Facility provided that PLC was liable for the full amount of any obligations for borrowings or letters of credit, including those of the Company, under the Credit Facility. The maturity date onof the Credit Facility iswas July 17, 2017. The Company is not aware of any non-compliance with the financial debt covenants of the Credit Facility as of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company). The Company did not have an outstanding balance under the Credit Facility as of September 30, 2014.December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company). PLC had an outstanding balance of $280.0$450.0 million bearing interest at an interesta rate of LIBOR plus 1.20% under the Credit Facility as of September 30, 2014.December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company). As of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), the Company had used $55.0 million of borrowing capacity by executing a Letter of Credit under the Credit Facility for the benefit of an

32



Table of Contents

affiliated captive reinsurance company. This Letter of Credit had not been drawn upon as of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company).

On February 2, 2015, the Company and PLC amended and restated the Credit Facility (the “2015 Credit Facility”). Under the 2015 Credit Facility, the Company has the ability to borrow on an unsecured basis up to an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion. The Company has the right in certain circumstances to request that the commitment under the 2015 Credit Facility be increased up to a maximum principal amount of $1.25 billion. Balances outstanding under the 2015 Credit Facility accrue interest at a rate equal to, at the option of the Borrowers, (i) LIBOR plus a spread based on the ratings of the PLC’s Senior Debt, or (ii) the sum of (A) a rate equal to the highest of (x) the Administrative Agent’s prime rate, (y) 0.50% above the Federal Funds rate, or (z) the one-month LIBOR plus 1.00% and (B) a spread based on the ratings of PLC’s Senior Debt. The 2015 Credit Facility also provided for a facility fee at a rate that varies with the ratings of the PLC’s Senior Debt and that is calculated on the aggregate amount of commitments under the 2015 Credit Facility, whether used or unused. The initial facility fee rate was 0.15% on February 2, 2015, and was adjusted to 0.125% upon PLC’s subsequent ratings upgrade on February 2, 2015. The 2015 Credit Facility provides that PLC is liable for the full amount of any obligations for borrowings or letters of credit, including those of the Company, under the 2015 Credit Facility. The maturity date of the 2015 Credit Facility is February 2, 2020. The Company is not aware of any non-compliance with the financial debt covenants of the Credit Facility as of February 2, 2015 or the 2015 Credit Facility as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). PLC had an outstanding balance of $545.0 million bearing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.00% as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). As of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company had used $55.0 million of borrowing capacity by executing a Letter of Credit under the Credit Facility for the benefit of an affiliated captive reinsurance company. This Letter of Credit had not been drawn upon as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

 

Non-Recourse Funding Obligations

 

Golden Gate Captive Insurance Company

 

Golden Gate Captive Insurance Company (“Golden Gate”), a South Carolina special purpose financial captive insurance company and wholly owned subsidiary, had three series of Surplus Notesnon-recourse funding obligations with a total outstanding balance of $800 million as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). PLC holds the entire outstanding balance of Surplus Notes.non-recourse funding obligations. The Series A1 Surplus Notesnon-recourse funding obligations have a balance of $400 million and accrue interest at a fixed rate of 7.375%, the Series A2 Surplus Notesnon-recourse funding obligations have a balance of $100 million and accrue interest at a fixed rate of 8%8.00%, and the Series A3 Surplus Notesnon-recourse funding obligations have a balance of $300 million and accrue interest at a fixed rate of 8.45%.

Golden Gate II Captive Insurance Company

 

Golden Gate II Captive Insurance Company (“Golden Gate II”), a South Carolina special purpose financial captive insurance company and wholly owned subsidiary, had $575$575.0 million of outstanding non-recourse funding obligations outstanding as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). These outstanding non-recourse funding obligations were issued to special purpose trusts, which in turn issued securities to third parties. Certain of our affiliates own a portion of these securities. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), securities related to $176.6$144.9 million of the outstanding balance of the non-recourse funding obligations were held by external parties, securities related to $145.3 million of the non-recourse funding obligations were held by nonconsolidated affiliates, and $253.1$284.8 million were held by consolidated subsidiaries of the Company. PLC has entered into certain support agreements with Golden Gate II obligating it to make capital contributions or provide support related to certain of Golden Gate II’s expenses and in certain circumstances, to collateralize certain of PLC’s obligations to Golden Gate II. These support agreements provide that amounts would become payable by PLC to Golden Gate II if its annual general corporate expenses were higher than modeled amounts or if Golden Gate II’s investment income on certain investments or premium income was below certain actuarially determined amounts. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), no payments have been made under these agreements, however, certain support agreement obligations to Golden Gate II of approximately $1.9 million have been collateralized by PLC. Re-evaluation and, if necessary, adjustments of any support agreement collateralization amounts occur annually during the first quarter pursuant to the terms of the support agreements.  There are no support agreements between the Company and Golden Gate II.

33



Table of Contents

 

Golden Gate V Vermont Captive Insurance Company

 

On October 10, 2012, Golden Gate V Vermont Captive Insurance Company (“Golden Gate V”), a Vermont special purpose financial insurance company and Red Mountain, LLC (“Red Mountain”), both wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into a 20-year transaction to finance up to $945 million of “AXXX” reserves related to a block of

26



Table of Contents

universal life insurance policies with secondary guarantees issued by the Company and its subsidiary, West Coast Life Insurance Company (“WCL”). Golden Gate V issued non-recourse funding obligations to Red Mountain, and Red Mountain issued a note with an initial principal amount of $275 million, increasing to a maximum of $945 million in 2027, to Golden Gate V for deposit to a reinsurance trust supporting Golden Gate V’s obligations under a reinsurance agreement with WCL, pursuant to which WCL cedes liabilities relating to the policies of WCL and retrocedes liabilities relating to the policies of the Company. Through the structure, Hannover Life Reassurance Company of America (“Hannover Re”), the ultimate risk taker in the transaction, provides credit enhancement to the Red Mountain note for the 20-year term in exchange for a fee. The transaction is “non-recourse” to Golden Gate V, Red Mountain, WCL, PLC, and the Company, meaning that none of these companies are liable for the reimbursement of any credit enhancement payments required to be made. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the principal balance of the Red Mountain note was $415$455 million. In connection with the transaction, PLC has entered into certain support agreements under which PLC guarantees or otherwise supports certain obligations of Golden Gate V or Red Mountain. Future scheduled capital contributions to prefund credit enhancement fees amount to approximately $144.3$139.6 million and will be paid in annual installments through 2031. The support agreements provide that amounts would become payable by PLC if Golden Gate V’s annual general corporate expenses were higher than modeled amounts or in the event write-downs due to other-than-temporary impairments on assets held in certain accounts exceed defined threshold levels. Additionally, PLC has entered into separate agreements to indemnify Golden Gate V with respect to material adverse changes in non-guaranteed elements of insurance policies reinsured by Golden Gate V, and to guarantee payment of certain fee amounts in connection with the credit enhancement of the Red Mountain note. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), no payments have been made under these agreements.agreements.

 

In connection with the transaction outlined above, Golden Gate V had a $415$455 million outstanding non-recourse funding obligation as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). This non-recourse funding obligation matures in 2037, has scheduled increases in principal to a maximum of $945 million, and accrues interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.25%.

 

Non-recourse funding obligations outstanding as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), on a consolidated basis, are shown in the following table:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year-to-Date

 

 

 

 

 

 

Year-to-Date

 

 

 

 

Maturity

 

Weighted-Avg

 

 

 

 

Maturity

 

Weighted-Avg

 

Issuer

 

Balance

 

Year

 

Interest Rate

 

 

Carrying Value

 

Year

 

Interest Rate

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

Golden Gate Captive Insurance Company(1)

 

$

800,000

 

2037

 

7.86

%

 

$

1,155,100

 

2037

 

4.66

%

Golden Gate II Captive Insurance Company

 

321,900

 

2052

 

1.11

%

 

235,487

 

2052

 

2.76

%

Golden Gate V Vermont Captive Insurance Company(1)

 

415,000

 

2037

 

6.25

%

 

520,864

 

2037

 

5.12

%

MONY Life Insurance Company (1)

 

2,515

 

2024

 

6.63

%

 

2,565

 

2024

 

6.19

%

Total

 

$

1,539,415

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

1,914,016

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1) Fixed rate obligations

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), the Company repurchased $6.0 milliondid not repurchase any of its outstanding non-recourse funding obligations, at a discount. These repurchases resulted in a $1.5 million pre-tax gain for the Company.obligations. For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2013,March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), the Company repurchased $5.0 milliondid not repurchase any of its outstanding non-recourse funding obligations, at a discount. These repurchases resulted in a $1.3 million pre-tax gain for the Company. These gains are recorded in other income in the consolidated condensed statements of income.obligations.

Letters of Credit

 

Golden Gate III Vermont Captive Insurance Company (“Golden Gate III”), a Vermont special purpose financial insurance company and wholly owned subsidiary, is party to a Reimbursement Agreement (the “Reimbursement Agreement”) with UBS AG, Stamford Branch (“UBS”), as issuing lender. Under the original

34



Table of Contents

Reimbursement Agreement, dated April 23, 2010, UBS issued a letter of credit (the “LOC”) in the initial amount of $505 million to a trust for the benefit of WCL. The Reimbursement Agreement was subsequently amended and restated effective November 21, 2011 (the “First Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement”), to replace the existing LOC with one or more letters of credit from UBS, and to extend the maturity date from April 1, 2018, to April 1, 2022. On August 7, 2013, Golden Gate III entered into a Second Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement with UBS (the “Second Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement”), which amended and restated the First

27



Table of Contents

Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. Under the Second and Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement a new LOC in an initial amount of $710 million was issued by UBS in replacement of the existing LOC issued under the First Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. The term of the LOC was extended from April 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023, subject to certain conditions being satisfied including scheduled capital contributions being made to Golden Gate III by one of its affiliates. The maximum stated amount of the LOC was increased from $610 million to $720 million in 2015 if certain conditions arehad been met. On June 25, 2014, the CompanyPLC entered into a Third Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement with UBS (the “Third Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement”), which amended and restated the Second Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. Under the Third Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement, a new LOC in an initial amount of $915 million was issued by UBS in replacement of the existing LOC issued under the Second Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. The term of the LOC was extended from October 1, 2023 to April 1, 2025, subject to certain conditions being satisfied including scheduled capital contributions being made to Golden Gate III by one of its affiliates. The maximum stated amount of the LOC was increased from $720 million to $935 million in 2015 if certain conditions are met. The LOC is held in trust for the benefit of WCL, and supports certain obligations of Golden Gate III to WCL under an indemnity reinsurance agreement originally effective April 1, 2010, as amended and restated on November 21, 2011, and as further amended and restated on August 7, 2013 and on June 25, 2014 to include additional blocks of policies, and pursuant to which WCL cedes liabilities relating to the policies of WCL and retrocedes liabilities relating to the policies of the Company. The LOC balance was $925$935 million as of September 30, 2014. Subject to certain conditions, the amount of the LOC will be periodically increased up to a maximum of $935 million in 2015.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). The term of the LOC is expected to be approximately 15 years from the original issuance date. This transaction is “non-recourse” to WCL, PLC, and the Company, meaning that none of these companies other than Golden Gate III are liable for reimbursement on a draw of the LOC. The CompanyPLC has entered into certain support agreements with Golden Gate III obligating the CompanyPLC to make capital contributions or provide support related to certain of Golden Gate III’s expenses and in certain circumstances, to collateralize certain of the Company’sPLC’s obligations to Golden Gate III. Future scheduled capital contributions amount to approximately $122.5 million and will be paid in three installments with the last payment occurring in 2021, and these contributions may be subject to potential offset against dividend payments as permitted under the terms of the Third Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. The support agreements provide that amounts would become payable by the CompanyPLC to Golden Gate III if itsGolden Gate III’s annual general corporate expenses were higher than modeled amounts or if specified catastrophic losses occur during defined time periods with respect to the policies reinsured by Golden Gate III. Pursuant to the terms of an amended and restated letter agreement with UBS, the CompanyPLC has continued to guarantee the payment of fees to UBS as specified in the Third Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), no payments have been made under these agreements.

 

Golden Gate IV Vermont Captive Insurance Company (“Golden Gate IV”), a Vermont special purpose financial insurance company and wholly owned subsidiary, is party to a Reimbursement Agreement with UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as issuing lender. Under the Reimbursement Agreement, dated December 10, 2010, UBS issued an LOC in the initial amount of $270 million to a trust for the benefit of WCL. The LOC balance increased, in accordance with the terms of the Reimbursement Agreement, during the thirdeach quarter of 20142015 and was $740$760 million as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). Subject to certain conditions, the amount of the LOC will be periodically increased up to a maximum of $790 million in 2016. The term of the LOC is expected to be 12 years from the original issuance date (stated maturity of December 30, 2022). The LOC was issued to support certain obligations of Golden Gate IV to WCL under an indemnity reinsurance agreement, pursuant to which WCL cedes liabilities relating to the policies of WCL and retrocedes liabilities relating to the policies of the Company. This transaction is “non-recourse” to WCL, PLC, and the Company, meaning that none of these companies other than Golden Gate IV are liable for reimbursement on a draw of the LOC. PLC has entered into certain support agreements with Golden Gate IV obligating PLC to make capital contributions or provide support related to certain of Golden Gate IV’s expenses and in certain circumstances, to collateralize certain of PLC’s obligations to Golden Gate IV. The support agreements provide that amounts would become payable by PLC to Golden Gate IV if Golden Gate IV’s annual general corporate expenses were higher than modeled amounts or if specified catastrophic losses occur during defined time periods with respect to the policies

35



Table of Contents

reinsured by Golden Gate IV. PLC has also entered into a separate agreement to guarantee the payments of LOC fees under the terms of the Reimbursement Agreement. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), no payments have been made under these agreements.

28



Table of Contents

 

Repurchase Program Borrowings

 

While the Company anticipates that the cash flows of its operating subsidiaries will be sufficient to meet its investment commitments and operating cash needs in a normal credit market environment, the Company recognizes that investment commitments scheduled to be funded may, from time to time, exceed the funds then available. Therefore, the Company has established repurchase agreement programs for certain of its insurance subsidiaries to provide liquidity when needed. The Company expects that the rate received on its investments will equal or exceed its borrowing rate. Under this program, the Company may, from time to time, sell an investment security at a specific price and agree to repurchase that security at another specified price at a later date. These borrowings are typically for a term less than 90 days. The market value of securities to be repurchased is monitored and collateral levels are adjusted where appropriate to protect the counterparty against credit exposure. Cash received is invested in fixed maturity securities, and the agreements provided for net settlement in the event of default or on termination of the agreements. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the fair value of securities pledged under the repurchase program was $402.0$560.2 million and the repurchase obligation of $359.8$510.1 million was included in the Company’s consolidated condensed balance sheets (at an average borrowing rate of 815 basis points). During the nine months ended September 30,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), the maximum balance outstanding at any one point in time related to these programs was $607.6 million and $175.0 million, respectively. The average daily balance was $381.3 million and $77.4 million (at an average borrowing rate of 15 and 16 basis points, respectively) during the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), respectively. As of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), the Company had a $50.0 million outstanding balance related to such borrowings. During 2014, the maximum balance outstanding at any one point in time related to these programs was $633.7 million. The average daily balance was $511.3 million (at an average borrowing rate of 10 basis points) during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had a $350.0 million outstanding balance related to such borrowings. During 2013, the maximum balance outstanding at any one point in time related to these programs was $815.0 million. The average daily balance was $496.9$470.4 million (at an average borrowing rate of 11 basis points) during the year ended December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company).

The following table provides the amount of collateral pledged for repurchase agreements, grouped by asset class, as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

Repurchase Agreements, Securities Lending Transactions, and Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions

Accounted for as Secured Borrowings

 

 

Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements

 

 

 

As of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

Overnight and

 

 

 

 

 

Greater Than

 

 

 

 

 

Continuous

 

Up to 30 days

 

30-90 days

 

90 days

 

Total

 

Repurchase agreements and repurchase-to-maturity transactions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

U.S. Treasury and agency securities

 

$

53,601

 

$

10,295

 

$

 

$

 

$

63,896

 

State and municipal securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Equity securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-U.S. sovereign debt

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loans

 

496,337

 

 

 

 

496,337

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total borrowings

 

$

549,938

 

$

10,295

 

$

 

$

 

$

560,233

 

36



Table of Contents

 

10.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

Under insurance guaranty fund laws, in most states insurance companies doing business therein can be assessed up to prescribed limits for policyholder losses incurred by insolvent companies. In addition, from time to time, companies may be asked to contribute amounts beyond prescribed limits. Most insurance guaranty fund laws provide that an assessment may be excused or deferred if it would threaten an insurer’s own financial strength. The Company does not believe its insurance guaranty fund assessments will be materially different from amounts already provided for in the financial statements.

 

A number of civil jury verdicts have been returned against insurers, broker dealers and other providers of financial services involving sales, refund or claims practices, alleged agent misconduct, failure to properly supervise representatives, relationships with agents or persons with whom the insurer does business, and other matters. Often these lawsuits have resulted in the award of substantial judgments that are disproportionate to the actual damages, including material amounts of punitive and non-economic compensatory damages. In some states, juries, judges, and arbitrators have substantial discretion in awarding punitive non-economic compensatory damages which creates the potential for unpredictable material adverse judgments or awards in any given lawsuit or arbitration. Arbitration awards are subject to very limited appellate review. In addition, in some class action and other lawsuits, companies have made material settlement payments. Publicly held companies in general and the financial services and insurance industries in particular are also sometimes the target of law enforcement and regulatory investigations relating to the numerous laws and regulations that govern such companies. Some companies have been the subject of law enforcement or regulatory actions or other actions resulting from such investigations. The Company, in the ordinary course of business, is involved in such matters.

 

The Company establishes liabilities for litigation and regulatory actions when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. For matters where a loss is believed to be reasonably possible, but not probable, no liability is established. For such matters, the Company may provide an estimate of the possible loss or range of loss or a statement that such an estimate cannot be made. The Company reviews relevant information with respect to litigation and regulatory matters on a quarterly and annual basis and updates its established liabilities, disclosures and estimates of reasonably possible losses or range of loss based on such reviews.

 

Although the Company cannot predict the outcome of any litigation or regulatory action or provide assurances as to the ultimate settlement of the Delaware Action, the Company does not believe that any such outcome will have an impact, either individually or in the aggregate, on its financial condition or results of operations that differs materially from the Company’s established liabilities. Given the inherent difficulty

29



Table of Contents

in predicting the outcome of such matters, however, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain such matters could be material to the Company’s financial condition or results of operations for any particular reporting period.

 

The Company was audited by the IRS and the IRS proposed favorable and unfavorable adjustments to the Company’s 2003 through 2007 reported taxable income. The Company protested certain unfavorable adjustments and sought resolution at the IRS’ Appeals Division. The case has followed normal procedure and is now under review at Congress’ Joint Committee on Taxation. The Company believes the matter will conclude within the next twelve months. If the IRS prevails on every issue that it identified in this audit, and the Company does not litigate these issues, then the Company will make an income tax payment of approximately $24.3 million.$136,000. However, this payment, if it were to occur, would not materially impact the Company or its effective tax rate.

 

Through the acquisition of MONY by the Company certain income tax credit carryforwards, which arose in MONY’s pre-acquisition tax years, transferred to the Company. This transfer was in accordance with the applicable rules of the Internal Revenue Code and the related Regulations. In spite of this transfer, AXA, the former parent of the consolidated income tax return group in which MONY was a member, retains the right to utilize these credits in the future to offset future increases in its 2010 through 2013 tax liabilities. The Company had determined that, based on all information known as of the acquisition date and through the March 31, 2014 reporting date, it was probable that a loss of the utilization of these carryforwards had been incurred. Due to indemnification received from AXA during the quarter ending June 30, 2014, the probability of loss of these carryforwards has been eliminated. Accordingly, in the table summarizing the fair value of net assets acquired from the Acquisition, the amount of the deferred tax asset from the credit carryforwards is no longer offset by a liability.

 

The Company has received notice from two third party auditors that certain37



Table of Contents

Certain of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries, as well as certain other insurance companies for which the Company has coinsured blocks of life insurance and annuity policies, are under audit for compliance with the unclaimed property laws of a number of states. The audits are being conducted on behalf of the treasury departments or unclaimed property administrators in such states. The focus of the audits is on whether there have been unreported deaths, maturities, or policies that have exceeded limiting age with respect to which death benefits or other payments under life insurance or annuity policies should be treated as unclaimed property that should be escheated to the state. The Company is presently unable to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss that may result from the audits due to a number of factors, including uncertainty as to the legal theory or theories that may give rise to liability, the early stages of the audits being conducted, and, with respect to one block of life insurance policies that is co-insured by a subsidiary of the Company, uncertainty as to whether the Company or other companies are responsible for the liabilities, if any, arising in connection with such policies. The Company will continue to monitor the matter for any developments that would make the loss contingency associated with the audits probable or reasonably estimable.

 

Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries have received notice that they are subject tounder a targeted multi-state examination with respect to their claims paying practices and their use of the U.S. Social Security Administration’s Death Master File or similar databases (a “Death Database”) to identify unreported deaths in their life insurance policies, annuity contracts and retained asset accounts. There is no clear basis in previously existing law for requiring a life insurer to search for unreported deaths in order to determine whether a benefit is owed, and substantial legal authority exists to support the position that the prevailing industry practice was lawful. A number of life insurers, however, have entered into settlement or consent agreements with state insurance regulators under which the life insurers agreed to implement procedures for periodically comparing their life insurance and annuity contracts and retained asset accounts against a Death Database, treating confirmed deaths as giving rise to a death benefit under their policies, locating beneficiaries and paying them the benefits and interest, and escheating the benefits and interest as well as penalties to the state if the beneficiary could not be found. It has been publicly reported that the life insurers have paid substantial administrative and/or examination fees to the insurance regulators in connection with the settlement or consent agreements. The Company believes it is reasonably possible that insurance regulators could demand from the Company administrative and/or examination fees relating to the targeted multi-state examination. Based on publicly reported payments by other life insurers, the Company estimates the range of such fees to be from $0 to $3.5 million.

30



Table of Contents

 

11.STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, 203,295 performance shares with an estimated fair value of $10.5 million were awarded. The criteria for payment of the 2014 performance awards is based primarily on PLC’s average operating return on average equity (“ROE”) over a three-year period. If PLC’s ROE is below 10.5%, no award is earned. If PLC’s ROE is at or above 12.0%, the award maximum is earned. Awards are paid in shares of PLC’s common stock.

Restricted stock units are awarded to participants and include certain restrictions relating to vesting periods. PLC issued 98,700 restricted stock units for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. These awards had a total fair value at grant date of $5.1 million. Approximately half of these restricted stock units vest after three years from the grant date and the remainder vest after four years.

Stock appreciation right (“SARs”) have been granted to certain officers of PLC to provide long-term incentive compensation based solely on the performance of PLC’s common stock. The SARs are exercisable either five years after the date of grant or in three or four equal annual installments beginning one year after the date of grant (earlier upon the death, disability, or retirement of the officer, or in certain circumstances, of a change in control of PLC) and expire after ten years or upon termination of employment. The SARs activity as well as weighted-average base price is as follows:

 

 

Weighted-Average

 

 

 

 

 

Base Price per share

 

No. of SARs

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

 

$

23.08

 

1,305,101

 

SARs granted

 

 

 

SARs exercised / forfeited

 

21.94

 

(1,127,156

)

Balance at September 30, 2014

 

$

30.27

 

177,945

 

PLC will pay an amount in stock equal to the difference between the specified base price of PLC’s common stock and the market value at the exercise date for each SAR. There were no SARs issued for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

12.                               EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

 

ComponentsDue to the Dai-ichi Life transaction, PLC re-measured all materially impacted benefit plans as of January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company). Financial re-measurement was performed for the net periodicdefined benefit costpension plan, the unfunded excess benefit plan, and the postretirement life insurance plan as of January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company). The January results for the retiree life plan were not material, and therefore, re-measurement was not deemed necessary for this plan. The Company has disclosed relevant financial information related to the January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) re-measurement, as follows.

38



Table of Contents

The following table presents the benefit obligation, fair value of plan assets, and the funded status of the PLC’s defined benefit pension plan and unfunded excess benefit plan of January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) and December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company). This table also includes the amounts not yet recognized as components of net periodic pension costs as of January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) and December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

 

Predecessor Company

 

 

 

Defined Benefit

 

Unfunded Excess

 

 

 

Pension Plan

 

Benefits Plan

 

 

 

2015 

 

2014 

 

2015 

 

2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Accumulated benefit obligation, end of period

 

$

  262,290

 

$

  249,453

 

$

  49,251

 

$

  47,368

 

Change in projected benefit obligation:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of period

 

$

  267,331

 

$

  219,152

 

$

  49,575

 

$

  39,679

 

Service cost

 

974

 

9,411

 

95

 

954

 

Interest cost

 

1,002

 

10,493

 

140

 

1,696

 

Amendments

 

 

 

 

 

Actuarial (gain) or loss

 

12,384

 

38,110

 

1,555

 

9,153

 

Benefits paid

 

(592

)

(9,835

)

(122

)

(1,907

)

Projected benefit obligation at end of period

 

281,099

 

267,331

 

51,243

 

49,575

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Change in plan assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period

 

203,772

 

180,173

 

 

 

Actual return on plan assets

 

(3,525

)

17,921

 

 

 

Employer contributions(1)

 

2,165

 

15,513

 

122

 

1,907

 

Benefits paid

 

(592

)

(9,835

)

(122

)

(1,907

)

Fair value of plan assets at end of period

 

201,820

 

203,772

 

 

 

After reflecting FASB guidance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funded status

 

(79,279

)

(63,559

)

(51,243

)

(49,575

)

Amounts recognized in the balance sheet:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other liabilities

 

(79,279

)

(63,559

)

(51,243

)

(49,575

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net actuarial loss

 

96,965

 

80,430

 

22,401

 

20,983

 

Prior service cost/(credit)

 

(1,001

)

(1,033

)

23

 

24

 

Net transition asset

 

$

  95,964

 

$

  79,397

 

$

  22,424

 

$

  21,007

 


(1) Employer contributions disclosed are based on the Company’s fiscal filing year.

As of January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) and December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), the projected benefit obligation associated with the postretirement life insurance plan was $9.8 million and $9.3 million, respectively.

As a result of the Merger on February 1, 2015, all unrecognized prior service costs or credits, actuarial gains or losses, and any remaining transition assets or obligations were not carried forward on the acquisition date. Therefore, the amounts presented in the “Amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income” in the chart above were set to zero on the Merger date.

39



Table of Contents

The benefit obligations as of January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) were determined based on the assumptions used in the 2014 year-end disclosures with the follow exception:

 

 

Defined Benefit

 

Unfunded Excess

 

Postretirement

 

 

 

Pension Plan

 

Benefit Plan

 

Life Insurance Plan

 

Discount rate

 

3.55

%

3.26

%

3.79

%

Components of the net periodic benefit cost for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and for the three months ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company) are as follows:

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

Service cost – benefits earned during the period

 

$

2,453

 

$

2,708

 

$

7,359

 

$

8,124

 

 

Defined

 

Unfunded

 

 

Defined

 

Unfunded

 

Defined

 

Unfunded

 

 

Benefit

 

Excess

 

 

Benefit

 

Excess

 

Benefit

 

Excess

 

 

Pension

 

Benefit

 

 

Pension

 

Benefit

 

Pension

 

Benefit

 

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

Plan

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Service cost — benefits earned during the period

 

$

2,577

 

$

252

 

 

$

974

 

$

95

 

$

2,227

 

$

226

 

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

 

2,993

 

2,553

 

8,979

 

7,659

 

 

2,652

 

371

 

 

1,002

 

140

 

2,587

 

406

 

Expected return on plan assets

 

(3,065

)

(2,759

)

(9,195

)

(8,277

)

 

(3,423

)

 

 

(1,293

)

 

(3,065

)

 

Amortization of prior service cost/(credit)

 

(95

)

(95

)

(285

)

(285

)

Amortization of prior service cost

 

(98

)

3

 

 

(33

)

1

 

(98

)

3

 

Amortization of actuarial losses

 

1,897

 

2,729

 

5,691

 

8,187

 

 

1,781

 

364

 

 

668

 

138

 

1,576

 

321

 

Total benefit cost

 

$

4,183

 

$

5,136

 

$

12,549

 

$

15,408

 

Total net periodic benefit cost

 

$

3,489

 

$

990

 

 

$

1,318

 

$

374

 

$

3,227

 

$

956

 

 

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014,period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), PLC contributed $9.0$2.2 million to its defined benefit pension plan for the 2013 plan year and $6.3 millionwhich was applied for the 2014 plan year. During October of 2014, PLC contributed $0.2 milliondid not contribute to the defined benefit pension plan forduring the 2014 plan year.period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). PLC will continue to make contributions in future periods as necessary to at least satisfy minimum funding requirements. PLC may also make additional

31



Table of Contents

contributions in future periods to maintain an adjusted funding target attainment percentage (“AFTAP”) of at least 80% and to avoid certain Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (“PBGC”) reporting triggers.

 

In addition to pension benefits, PLC provides life insurance benefits to eligible retirees and limited healthcare benefits to eligible retirees who are not yet eligible for Medicare. For a closed group40



Table of retirees over age 65, PLC provides a prescription drug benefit. The cost of these plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, was immaterial to PLC’s financial statements.Contents

 

13.12.                               ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

The following tables summarize the changes in the accumulated balances for each component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (“AOCI”) as of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

Accumulated

 

Other

 

 

 

Gains and Losses

 

Gain and Loss

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

on Investments

 

Derivatives

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands, Net of Tax)

 

Beginning Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

540,201

 

$

(1,235

)

$

538,966

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

797,925

 

(58

)

797,867

 

Other comprehensive income relating to other-than-temporary impaired investments for which a portion has been recognized in earnings

 

4,494

 

 

4,494

 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1)

 

(28,864

)

1,025

 

(27,839

)

Net current-period other comprehensive income

 

773,555

 

967

 

774,522

 

Ending Balance, September 30, 2014

 

$

1,313,756

 

$

(268

)

$

1,313,488

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

Accumulated

 

Other

 

 

 

Gains and Losses

 

Gain and Loss

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

on Investments(2)

 

Derivatives

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands, Net of Tax)

 

Successor Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning Balance, February 1, 2015

 

$

 

 

$

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

(292,273

)

(23

)

(292,296

)

Other comprehensive income (loss) relating to other- than-temporary impaired investments for which a portion has been recognized in earnings

 

 

 

 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1)

 

(242

)

59

 

(183

)

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

 

(292,515

)

36

 

(292,479

)

Ending Balance, March 31, 2015

 

$

(292,515

)

$

36

 

$

(292,479

)

 


(1) See Reclassification table below for details.

(2) These balances were offset by the impact of DAC and VOBA by $198.1 million and $380.4$10.7 million as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

Unrealized

 

Accumulated

 

Other

 

 

 

Gains and Losses

 

Gain and Loss

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

on Investments(2)

 

Derivatives

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands, Net of Tax)

 

Predecessor Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning Balance, December 31, 2014

 

$

1,483,293

 

$

(82

)

$

1,483,211

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

482,143

 

9

 

482,152

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) relating to other- than-temporary impaired investments for which a portion has been recognized in earnings

 

(243

)

 

(243

)

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1)

 

(4,166

)

23

 

(4,143

)

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

 

477,734

 

32

 

477,766

 

Ending Balance, January 31, 2015

 

$

1,961,027

 

$

(50

)

$

1,960,977

 


(1) See Reclassification table below for details.

(2) These balances were offset by the impact of DAC and VOBA by $(512.1) million and $(397.5) million as of January 31, 2015 and December 31, 2013

and September 30, 2014, respectively.

41



Table of Contents

 

Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

 

Accumulated

 

 

Unrealized

 

Accumulated

 

Other

 

 

Unrealized

 

Accumulated

 

Other

 

 

Gains and Losses

 

Gain and Loss

 

Comprehensive

 

 

Gains and Losses

 

Gain and Loss

 

Comprehensive

 

 

on Investments

 

Derivatives

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

on Investments(2)

 

Derivatives

 

Income (Loss)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands, Net of Tax)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands, Net of Tax)

 

Beginning Balance, December 31, 2012

 

$

1,814,620

 

$

(3,496

)

$

1,811,124

 

Predecessor Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

540,201

 

$

(1,235

)

$

538,966

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications

 

(1,250,416

)

734

 

(1,249,682

)

 

983,985

 

(2

)

983,983

 

Other comprehensive income relating to other-than-temporary impaired investments for which a portion has been recognized in earnings

 

4,591

 

 

4,591

 

Other comprehensive income (loss) relating to other- than-temporary impaired investments for which a portion has been recognized in earnings

 

3,498

 

 

3,498

 

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)(1)

 

(28,594

)

1,527

 

(27,067

)

 

(44,391

)

1,155

 

(43,236

)

Net current-period other comprehensive income (loss)

 

(1,274,419

)

2,261

 

(1,272,158

)

 

943,092

 

1,153

 

944,245

 

Ending Balance, December 31, 2013

 

$

540,201

 

$

(1,235

)

$

538,966

 

Ending Balance, December 31, 2014

 

$

1,483,293

 

$

(82

)

$

1,483,211

 

 


(1) See Reclassification table below for details.

(2) These balances were offset by the impact of DAC and VOBA by $204.9$(198.1) million and $198.1$(397.5) million as of December 31, 20122013 and 2013,2014, respectively.

32



Table of Contents

 

The following tables summarize the reclassifications amounts out of AOCI for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2014 and 2013.(Predecessor Company).

 

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

Reclassified

 

 

 

 

Reclassified

 

 

 

 

from Accumulated

 

 

 

 

from Accumulated

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive

 

Affected Line Item in the

 

 

Other Comprehensive

 

Affected Line Item in the

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

Successor Company

 

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

Gains and losses on derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net settlement (expense)/benefit(1)

 

$

(293

)

Benefits and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance ceded

 

 

$

(90

)

Benefits and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance ceded

 

 

(293

)

Total before tax

 

 

(90

)

Total before tax

 

 

103

 

Tax (expense) or benefit

 

 

31

 

Tax benefit

 

 

$

(190

)

Net of tax

 

 

$

(59

)

Net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment gains/(losses)

 

$

22,244

 

Realized investment gains (losses): All other investments

 

Net investment gains/losses

 

$

373

 

Realized investment gains (losses): All other investments

 

Impairments recognized in earnings

 

(2,354

)

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

 

 

 

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

 

 

19,890

 

Total before tax

 

 

373

 

Total before tax

 

 

(6,962

)

Tax (expense) or benefit

 

 

(131

)

Tax expense

 

 

$

12,928

 

Net of tax

 

 

$

242

 

Net of tax

 

 


(1)See Note 16, 15, Derivative Financial Instruments for additional information.

 

3342



Table of Contents

 

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

Reclassified

 

 

 

 

Reclassified

 

 

 

 

from Accumulated

 

 

 

 

from Accumulated

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive

 

Affected Line Item in the

 

 

Other Comprehensive

 

Affected Line Item in the

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Predecessor Company

 

 

 

 

 

January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

Gains and losses on derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net settlement (expense)/benefit(1)

 

$

(572

)

Benefits and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance ceded

 

 

$

(36

)

Benefits and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance ceded

 

 

(572

)

Total before tax

 

 

(36

)

Total before tax

 

 

200

 

Tax (expense) or benefit

 

 

13

 

Tax benefit

 

 

$

(372

)

Net of tax

 

 

$

(23

)

Net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment gains/(losses)

 

$

10,546

 

Realized investment gains (losses): All other investments

 

Net investment gains/losses

 

$

6,891

 

Realized investment gains (losses): All other investments

 

Impairments recognized in earnings

 

(8,681

)

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

 

 

(481

)

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

 

 

1,865

 

Total before tax

 

 

6,410

 

Total before tax

 

 

(653

)

Tax (expense) or benefit

 

 

(2,244

)

Tax expense

 

 

$

1,212

 

Net of tax

 

 

$

4,166

 

Net of tax

 

 


(1)See Note 16, 15, Derivative Financial Instruments for additional information.

34



Table of Contents

The following tables summarize the reclassifications amounts out of AOCI for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

 

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

Reclassified

 

 

 

 

Reclassified

 

 

 

 

from Accumulated

 

 

 

 

from Accumulated

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive

 

Affected Line Item in the

 

 

Other Comprehensive

 

Affected Line Item in the

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

Predecessor Company

 

 

 

 

 

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

Gains and losses on derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net settlement (expense)/benefit(1)

 

$

(1,577

)

Benefits and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance ceded

 

 

$

(670

)

Benefits and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance ceded

 

 

(1,577

)

Total before tax

 

 

(670

)

Total before tax

 

 

552

 

Tax (expense) or benefit

 

 

234

 

Tax benefit

 

 

$

(1,025

)

Net of tax

 

 

$

(436

)

Net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment gains/(losses)

 

$

49,812

 

Realized investment gains (losses): All other investments

 

Net investment gains/losses

 

$

7,370

 

Realized investment gains (losses): All other investments

 

Impairments recognized in earnings

 

(5,405

)

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

 

 

(1,591

)

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

 

 

44,407

 

Total before tax

 

 

5,779

 

Total before tax

 

 

(15,543

)

Tax (expense) or benefit

 

 

(2,023

)

Tax expense

 

 

$

28,864

 

Net of tax

 

 

$

3,756

 

Net of tax

 

 


(1)See Note 16, 15, Derivative Financial Instruments, for additional information.

Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

 

Amount

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassified

 

 

 

 

 

from Accumulated

 

 

 

 

 

Other Comprehensive

 

Affected Line Item in the

 

 

 

Income (Loss)

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

Gains and losses on derivative instruments

 

 

 

 

 

Net settlement (expense)/benefit(1)

 

$

(1,649

)

Benefits and settlement expenses, net of reinsurance ceded

 

 

 

(1,649

)

Total before tax

 

 

 

577

 

Tax (expense) or benefit

 

 

 

$

(1,072

)

Net of tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment gains/(losses)

 

$

44,503

 

Realized investment gains (losses): All other investments

 

Impairments recognized in earnings

 

(17,265

)

Net impairment losses recognized in earnings

 

 

 

27,238

 

Total before tax

 

 

 

(9,533

)

Tax (expense) or benefit

 

 

 

$

17,705

 

Net of tax

 


(1)See Note 16, Derivative Financial Instruments, for additional information.

 

3543



Table of Contents

 

14.13.                               INCOME TAXES

 

In the IRS audit that concluded in 2012, the IRS proposed favorable and unfavorable adjustments to the Company’s 2003 through 2007 reported taxable incomes. The Company protested certain unfavorable adjustments and is seeking resolution at the IRS’ Appeals Division. If the IRS prevails at Appeals, and the Company does not litigate these issues, an acceleration of tax payments will occur. However, such accelerated payments, if they were to occur, would not materially impact the Company or its effective tax raterate.

.In conjunction with the Merger and as a result of the adjustments to the Company’s assets and liabilities which were discussed in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were remeasured as of the date of the Merger.

The components of the Company’s net deferred income tax liability are as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Company

 

 

Company

 

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Deferred income tax assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss and credit carryforwards

 

$

43,545

 

 

$

35,642

 

Premium receivables and policy liabilities

 

23,463

 

 

154,720

 

Deferred compensation

 

102,765

 

 

104,117

 

Invested assets (other than unrealized gains)

 

 

 

2,960

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs

 

413,880

 

 

 

Unrealized loss on investments

 

157,527

 

 

 

Valuation allowance

 

(784

)

 

(791

)

 

 

740,396

 

 

296,648

 

Deferred income tax liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

VOBA and other intangibles

 

687,220

 

 

 

DAC and VOBA

 

 

 

1,073,499

 

Invested assets (other than unrealized gains)

 

1,692,028

 

 

 

Net unrealized gains (losses) on investments

 

 

 

798,529

 

Other

 

50,908

 

 

36,484

 

 

 

2,430,156

 

 

1,908,512

 

Net deferred income tax liability

 

$

(1,689,760

)

 

$

(1,611,864

)

 

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

 

 

 

As of

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

As of

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Balance, beginning of period

 

$

85,846

 

$

74,335

 

 

$

105,850

 

 

$

168,076

 

$

85,846

 

Additions for tax positions of the current year

 

6,898

 

7,464

 

 

26,257

 

 

(5,010

)

57,392

 

Additions for tax positions of prior years

 

36,047

 

6,787

 

 

 

 

1,149

 

34,371

 

Reductions of tax positions of prior years:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Changes in judgment

 

(9,294

)

(2,740

)

 

(899

)

 

(58,365

)

(9,533

)

Settlements during the period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lapses of applicable statute of limitations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Balance, end of period

 

$

119,497

 

$

85,846

 

 

$

131,208

 

 

$

105,850

 

$

168,076

 

 

The Company believes that it is possible that in the next 12 months approximately $98.4$7.5 million of these unrecognized tax benefits will be reduced due to the expected closure of the aforementioned Appeals process andprocess. The decrease in the lapsingamount from what was previously reported is due to the execution of previous tax year’s statutesan extension of the statute of limitations. In general, this closure would represent the Company’s possible successful negotiation of certain issues,

44



Table of Contents

coupled with its payment of the assessed taxes on the remaining issues. RegardingDuring the amounts reported above forperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the nine months ended September 30, 2014period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and the twelve months ended December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), ongoing discussions with the IRS during these periods, which related to their ongoingthe examination ofthat is in progress for tax years ending December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2011 prompted the Company to contemporaneously revise upward its measurement of unrecognized tax benefits. These revisions included increasing prior determinations of amounts accrued for in earlier years as well as reducing some previously accrued amounts. These changes were almost entirely related to timing issues. Therefore, aside from the cost of interest, such changes did not result in any impact on the Company’s effective tax rate.

 

In July 2014, the Internal Revenue Service issued guidance related to the tax method of accounting for hedges of guaranteed benefits on variable annuity contracts. The Company has issued contracts that provide such benefits. It has treated the derivatives that economically hedge the risk associated with such contracts as tax hedges. There are several uncertainties regarding the provisions of this guidance. Examples include its effective date and its scope. Therefore, it is uncertain at this time whether this guidance will be applicable to the Company and whether it will adopt this guidance’s prescribed methodology. Consequently, the Company currently believes that the amounts of unrecognized tax benefits that relate to this issue and that are disclosed above are appropriate.

The Company used its estimate of its annual 20142015 and 20132014 income in computing its effective income tax rates for the threeperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and ninefor the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2014 and 2013.(Predecessor Company). The effective tax rates for the threeperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and nine months ended September 30, 2014 were 33.8% and 33.0%, respectively, and 32.7% and 32.8% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013,March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company) were 33.1%, 32.8%,  and 32.4%, respectively.

 

In general, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income tax examinations by taxing authorities for tax years that began before 2003.

 

Based on the Company’s current assessment of future taxable income, including available tax planning opportunities, the Company anticipates that it is more likely than not that it will generate sufficient taxable income to realize all of its material deferred tax assets. The Company did not record a valuation allowance against its material deferred tax assets as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

 

3645



Table of Contents

 

15.14.                               FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

The Company determined the fair value of its financial instruments based on the fair value hierarchy established in FASB guidance referenced in the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The Company has adopted the provisions from the FASB guidance that is referenced in the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic for non-financial assets and liabilities (such as property and equipment, goodwill, and other intangible assets) that are required to be measured at fair value on a periodic basis. The effect on the Company’s periodic fair value measurements for non-financial assets and liabilities was not material.

 

The Company has categorized its financial instruments, based on the priority of the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three level hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the category level is based on the lowest priority level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

 

Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on the consolidated condensed balance sheets are categorized as follows:

 

·                  Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market.

 

·                  Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active or significant inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include the following:

 

a)                                     Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets

b)                                     Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets

c)                                      Inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable

d)                                     Inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data through correlation or other means.

 

·                  Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement. They reflect management’s own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in pricing the asset or liability.

 

3746



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents the Company’s hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturity securities - available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

 

$

1,442,834

 

$

5

 

$

1,442,839

 

 

$

 

$

1,561,264

 

$

3

 

$

1,561,267

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

1,175,523

 

 

1,175,523

 

 

 

1,194,840

 

 

1,194,840

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

 

282,971

 

565,368

 

848,339

 

 

 

216,032

 

600,132

 

816,164

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

1,316,839

 

267,371

 

 

1,584,210

 

 

1,117,268

 

519,768

 

 

1,637,036

 

State, municipalities, and political subdivisions

 

 

1,609,032

 

3,675

 

1,612,707

 

 

 

1,678,089

 

 

1,678,089

 

Preferred stocks

 

63,744

 

 

 

63,744

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

22,020

 

 

22,020

 

 

 

19,204

 

 

19,204

 

Corporate bonds

 

132

 

26,009,580

 

1,377,806

 

27,387,518

 

Corporate securities

 

132

 

26,502,832

 

1,283,142

 

27,786,106

 

Total fixed maturity securities - available-for-sale

 

1,316,971

 

30,809,331

 

1,946,854

 

34,073,156

 

 

1,181,144

 

31,692,029

 

1,883,277

 

34,756,450

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturity securities - trading

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

290,862

 

 

290,862

 

 

 

302,108

 

 

302,108

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

151,870

 

 

151,870

 

 

 

157,632

 

 

157,632

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

 

101,523

 

170,676

 

272,199

 

 

 

109,199

 

170,500

 

279,699

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

229,222

 

4,889

 

 

234,111

 

 

253,335

 

4,906

 

 

258,241

 

State, municipalities, and political subdivisions

 

 

284,132

 

 

284,132

 

 

 

325,692

 

 

325,692

 

Preferred stocks

 

8,342

 

 

 

8,342

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

55,901

 

 

55,901

 

 

 

58,299

 

 

58,299

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

1,517,519

 

23,177

 

1,540,696

 

Corporate securities

 

 

1,453,460

 

19,614

 

1,473,074

 

Total fixed maturity securities - trading

 

229,222

 

2,406,696

 

193,853

 

2,829,771

 

 

261,677

 

2,411,296

 

190,114

 

2,863,087

 

Total fixed maturity securities

 

1,546,193

 

33,216,027

 

2,140,707

 

36,902,927

 

 

1,442,821

 

34,103,325

 

2,073,391

 

37,619,537

 

Equity securities

 

595,872

 

98,882

 

66,695

 

761,449

 

 

622,813

 

11,779

 

66,691

 

701,283

 

Other long-term investments (1)

 

99,961

 

71,316

 

61,274

 

232,551

 

Other long-term investments(1)

 

119,861

 

154,358

 

79,222

 

353,441

 

Short-term investments

 

160,535

 

17,764

 

 

178,299

 

 

231,166

 

15,456

 

 

246,622

 

Total investments

 

2,402,561

 

33,403,989

 

2,268,676

 

38,075,226

 

 

2,416,661

 

34,284,918

 

2,219,304

 

38,920,883

 

Cash

 

209,915

 

 

 

209,915

 

 

348,625

 

 

 

348,625

 

Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

Assets related to separate accounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable annuity

 

13,040,828

 

 

 

13,040,828

 

 

13,339,653

 

 

 

13,339,653

 

Variable universal life

 

813,178

 

 

 

813,178

 

 

857,167

 

 

 

857,167

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

16,466,482

 

$

33,403,989

 

$

2,268,676

 

$

52,139,147

 

 

$

16,962,106

 

$

34,284,918

 

$

2,219,304

 

$

53,466,328

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

 

$

 

$

98,129

 

$

98,129

 

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

 

$

 

$

97,108

 

$

97,108

 

Other liabilities (1)

 

39,510

 

110,728

 

420,185

 

570,423

 

 

40,030

 

78,238

 

477,729

 

595,997

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

39,510

 

$

110,728

 

$

518,314

 

$

668,552

 

 

$

40,030

 

$

78,238

 

$

574,837

 

$

693,105

 

 


(1)Includes certain freestanding and embedded derivatives.

(2)Represents liabilities related to fixed indexed annuities.

 

3847



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents the Company’s hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013:2014 (Predecessor Company):

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

 

Level 1

 

Level 2

 

Level 3

 

Total

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturity securities - available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

 

$

1,445,040

 

$

28

 

$

1,445,068

 

 

$

 

$

1,418,255

 

$

3

 

$

1,418,258

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

970,656

 

 

970,656

 

 

 

1,177,252

 

 

1,177,252

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

 

326,175

 

545,808

 

871,983

 

 

 

275,415

 

563,961

 

839,376

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

1,211,141

 

296,749

 

 

1,507,890

 

 

1,165,188

 

263,707

 

 

1,428,895

 

State, municipalities, and political subdivisions

 

 

1,407,154

 

3,675

 

1,410,829

 

 

 

1,684,014

 

3,675

 

1,687,689

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

51,427

 

 

51,427

 

 

 

20,172

 

 

20,172

 

Corporate bonds

 

107

 

24,198,529

 

1,549,940

 

25,748,576

 

Corporate securities

 

132

 

26,039,963

 

1,325,683

 

27,365,778

 

Total fixed maturity securities - available-for-sale

 

1,211,248

 

28,695,730

 

2,099,451

 

32,006,429

 

 

1,165,320

 

30,878,778

 

1,893,322

 

33,937,420

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturity securities - trading

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

310,877

 

 

310,877

 

 

 

288,114

 

 

288,114

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

158,570

 

 

158,570

 

 

 

151,111

 

 

151,111

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

 

93,278

 

194,977

 

288,255

 

 

 

105,118

 

169,461

 

274,579

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

191,332

 

4,906

 

 

196,238

 

 

245,563

 

4,898

 

 

250,461

 

State, municipalities, and political subdivisions

 

 

260,892

 

 

260,892

 

 

 

325,446

 

 

325,446

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

57,097

 

 

57,097

 

 

 

57,032

 

 

57,032

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

1,497,362

 

29,199

 

1,526,561

 

Corporate securities

 

 

1,447,333

 

24,744

 

1,472,077

 

Total fixed maturity securities - trading

 

191,332

 

2,382,982

 

224,176

 

2,798,490

 

 

245,563

 

2,379,052

 

194,205

 

2,818,820

 

Total fixed maturity securities

 

1,402,580

 

31,078,712

 

2,323,627

 

34,804,919

 

 

1,410,883

 

33,257,830

 

2,087,527

 

36,756,240

 

Equity securities

 

483,482

 

50,927

 

67,979

 

602,388

 

 

590,832

 

99,267

 

66,691

 

756,790

 

Other long-term investments (1)

 

56,469

 

54,965

 

98,886

 

210,320

 

 

119,997

 

106,079

 

44,625

 

270,701

 

Short-term investments

 

131,422

 

1,603

 

 

133,025

 

 

243,436

 

3,281

 

 

246,717

 

Total investments

 

2,073,953

 

31,186,207

 

2,490,492

 

35,750,652

 

 

2,365,148

 

33,466,457

 

2,198,843

 

38,030,448

 

Cash

 

345,579

 

 

 

345,579

 

 

268,286

 

 

 

268,286

 

Other assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets related to separate accounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable annuity

 

12,791,438

 

 

 

12,791,438

 

 

13,157,429

 

 

 

13,157,429

 

Variable universal life

 

783,618

 

 

 

783,618

 

 

834,940

 

 

 

834,940

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

15,994,588

 

$

31,186,207

 

$

2,490,492

 

$

49,671,287

 

 

$

16,625,803

 

$

33,466,457

 

$

2,198,843

 

$

52,291,103

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annuity account balances (2)

 

$

 

$

 

$

107,000

 

$

107,000

 

 

$

 

$

 

$

97,825

 

$

97,825

 

Other liabilities (1)

 

30,241

 

191,182

 

233,738

 

455,161

 

 

62,146

 

61,046

 

506,343

 

629,535

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

30,241

 

$

191,182

 

$

340,738

 

$

562,161

 

 

$

62,146

 

$

61,046

 

$

604,168

 

$

727,360

 

 


(1)Includes certain freestanding and embedded derivatives.

(2)Represents liabilities related to fixed indexed annuities.

 

Determination of fair values

 

The valuation methodologies used to determine the fair values of assets and liabilities reflect market participant assumptions and are based on the application of the fair value hierarchy that prioritizes observable market inputs over unobservable inputs. The Company determines the fair values of certain financial assets and financial liabilities based on quoted market prices, where available. The Company also determines certain fair values based on future cash flows discounted at the appropriate current market rate. Fair values reflect adjustments for counterparty credit quality, the Company’s credit standing, liquidity, and where appropriate, risk margins on unobservable parameters. The following is a discussion of the methodologies used to determine fair values for the financial instruments as listed in the above table.

 

The fair value of fixed maturity, short-term, and equity securities is determined by management after considering one of three primary sources of information: third party pricing services, non-binding independent broker quotations, or pricing matrices. Security pricing is applied using a ‘‘waterfall’’“waterfall” approach whereby publicly available

39



Table of Contents

prices are first sought from third party pricing services, the remaining unpriced securities are submitted to independent

48



Table of Contents

brokers for non-binding prices, or lastly, securities are priced using a pricing matrix. Typical inputs used by these three pricing methods include, but are not limited to: benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, issuer spreads, two-sided markets, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and reference data including market research publications. Third party pricing services price approximately 90% of the Company’s available-for-sale and trading fixed maturity securities. Based on the typical trading volumes and the lack of quoted market prices for available-for-sale and trading fixed maturities, third party pricing services derive the majority of security prices from observable market inputs such as recent reported trades for identical or similar securities making adjustments through the reporting date based upon available market observable information outlined above. If there are no recent reported trades, the third party pricing services and brokers may use matrix or model processes to develop a security price where future cash flow expectations are developed based upon collateral performance and discounted at an estimated market rate. Certain securities are priced via independent non-binding broker quotations, which are considered to have no significant unobservable inputs. When using non-bindingnon- binding independent broker quotations, the Company obtains one quote per security, typically from the broker from which we purchased the security. A pricing matrix is used to price securities for which the Company is unable to obtain or effectively rely on either a price from a third party pricing service or an independent broker quotation.

 

The pricing matrix used by the Company begins with current spread levels to determine the market price for the security. The credit spreads, assigned by brokers, incorporate the issuer’s credit rating, liquidity discounts, weighted-averageweighted- average of contracted cash flows, risk premium, if warranted, due to the issuer’s industry, and the security’s time to maturity. The Company uses credit ratings provided by nationally recognized rating agencies.

 

For securities that are priced via non-binding independent broker quotations, the Company assesses whether prices received from independent brokers represent a reasonable estimate of fair value through an analysis using internal and external cash flow models developed based on spreads and, when available, market indices. The Company uses a market-based cash flow analysis to validate the reasonableness of prices received from independent brokers. These analytics, which are updated daily, incorporate various metrics (yield curves, credit spreads, prepayment rates, etc.) to determine the valuation of such holdings. As a result of this analysis, if the Company determines there is a more appropriate fair value based upon the analytics, the price received from the independent broker is adjusted accordingly. The Company did not adjust any quotes or prices received from brokers during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company).

 

The Company has analyzed the third party pricing services’ valuation methodologies and related inputs and has also evaluated the various types of securities in its investment portfolio to determine an appropriate fair value hierarchy level based upon trading activity and the observability of market inputs that is in accordance with the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the ASC. Based on this evaluation and investment class analysis, each price was classified into Level 1, 2, or 3. Most prices provided by third party pricing services are classified into Level 2 because the significant inputs used in pricing the securities are market observable and the observable inputs are corroborated by the Company. Since the matrix pricing of certain fixed maturitiesdebt securities includes significant non-observable inputs, they are classified as Level 3.

 

Asset-Backed Securities

 

This category mainly consists of residential mortgage-backed securities, commercial mortgage-backed securities, and other asset-backed securities (collectively referred to as asset-backed securities or “ABS”). As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company held $3.4$3.5 billion of ABS classified as Level 2. These securities are priced from information provided by a third party pricing service and independent broker quotes. The third party pricing services and brokers mainly value securities using both a market and income approach to valuation. As part of this valuation process they consider the following characteristics of the item being measured to be relevant inputs: 1) weighted-average coupon rate, 2) weighted-average years to maturity, 3) types of underlying assets, 4) weighted-average coupon rate of the underlying assets, 5) weighted-average years to maturity of the underlying assets, 6) seniority level of the tranches owned, and 7) credit ratings of the securities.

 

After reviewing these characteristics of the ABS, the third party pricing service and brokers use certain inputs to determine the value of the security. For ABS classified as Level 2, the valuation would consist of predominantly market observable inputs such as, but not limited to: 1) monthly principal and interest payments on the underlying

40



Table of Contents

assets, 2) average life of the security, 3) prepayment speeds, 4) credit spreads, 5) treasury and swap yield curves, and

49



Table of Contents

6) discount margin. The Company reviews the methodologies and valuation techniques (including the ability to observe inputs) in assessing the information received from external pricing services and in consideration of the fair value presentation.

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company held $736.1$770.6 million of Level 3 ABS, which included $565.4$600.1 million of other asset-backed securities classified as available-for-sale and $170.7$170.5 million of other asset-backed securities classified as trading. These securities are predominantly ARS whose underlying collateral is at least 97% guaranteed by the FFELP. As a result of the ARS market collapse during 2008, the Company prices its ARS using an income approach valuation model. As part of the valuation process the Company reviews the following characteristics of the ARS in determining the relevant inputs: 1) weighted-average coupon rate, 2) weighted-average years to maturity, 3) types of underlying assets, 4) weighted-average coupon rate of the underlying assets, 5) weighted-average years to maturity of the underlying assets, 6) seniority level of the tranches owned, 7) credit ratings of the securities, 8) liquidity premium, and 9) paydown rate.

 

Corporate bonds,Securities, U.S. Government-related securities,Government-Related Securities, States, municipals,Municipals, and political subdivisions,Political Subdivisions, and Other government related securitiesGovernment Related Securities

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company classified approximately $29.8$30.6 billion of corporate bonds,securities, U.S. government-related securities, states, municipals, and political subdivisions, and other government-related securities as Level 2. The fair value of the Level 2 bonds and securities is predominantly priced by broker quotes and a third party pricing service. The Company has reviewed the valuation techniques of the brokers and third party pricing service and has determined that such techniques used Level 2 market observable inputs. The following characteristics of the bonds and securities are considered to be the primary relevant inputs to the valuation: 1) weighted- average coupon rate, 2) weighted-average years to maturity, 3) seniority, and 4) credit ratings. The Company reviews the methodologies and valuation techniques (including the ability to observe inputs) in assessing the information received from external pricing services and in consideration of the fair value presentation.

 

The brokers and third party pricing service utilize valuation models that consist of a hybrid income and market approach to valuation. The pricing models utilize the following inputs: 1) principal and interest payments, 2) treasury yield curve, 3) credit spreads from new issue and secondary trading markets, 4) dealer quotes with adjustments for issues with early redemption features, 5) liquidity premiums present on private placements, and 6) discount margins from dealers in the new issue market.

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company classified approximately $1.4$1.3 billion of bonds and securities as Level 3 valuations. Level 3 bonds and securities primarily represent investments in illiquid bonds for which no price is readily available. To determine a price, the Company uses a discounted cash flow model with both observable and unobservable inputs. These inputs are entered into an industry standard pricing model to determine the final price of the security. These inputs include: 1) principal and interest payments, 2) coupon rate, 3) sector and issuer level spread over treasury, 4) underlying collateral, 5) credit ratings, 6) maturity, 7) embedded options, 8) recent new issuance, 9) comparative bond analysis, and 10) an illiquidity premium.

 

Equities

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company held approximately $165.6$78.5 million of equity securities classified as Level 2 and Level 3. Of this total, $66.0 million represents Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock. The Company believes that the cost of the FHLB stock approximates fair value. The remainder of these equity securities is primarily investments in preferred stock.

 

Other long-term investmentsLong-Term Investments and Other liabilitiesLiabilities

 

Other long-term investments and other liabilities consist entirely of free-standing and embedded derivative financial instruments. Refer to Note 16,15, Derivative Financial Instruments for additional information related to derivatives. Derivative financial instruments are valued using exchange prices, independent broker quotations, or pricing valuation models, which utilize market data inputs. Excluding embedded derivatives, as of September 30, 2014, 78.3%March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), 81.6% of derivatives based upon notional values were priced using exchange prices or independent broker quotations. The remaining derivatives were priced by pricing valuation models, which

 

4150



Table of Contents

 

The remaining derivatives were priced by pricing valuation models, which predominantly utilize observable market data inputs. Inputs used to value derivatives include, but are not limited to, interest swap rates, credit spreads, interest rate and equity market volatility indices, equity index levels, and treasury rates. The Company performs monthly analysis on derivative valuations that includes both quantitative and qualitative analyses.

 

Derivative instruments classified as Level 1 generally include futures and puts,options, which are traded on active exchange markets.

 

Derivative instruments classified as Level 2 primarily include interest rate and inflation swaps, options, and swaptions. These derivative valuations are determined using independent broker quotations, which are corroborated with observable market inputs.

 

Derivative instruments classified as Level 3 were embedded derivatives and include at least one significant non-observable input. A derivative instrument containing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs will be classified as a Level 3 financial instrument in its entirety if it has at least one significant Level 3 input.

 

The Company utilizes derivative instruments to manage the risk associated with certain assets and liabilities. However, the derivative instruments may not be classified within the same fair value hierarchy level as the associated assets and liabilities. Therefore, the changes in fair value on derivatives reported in Level 3 may not reflect the offsetting impact of the changes in fair value of the associated assets and liabilities.

 

The embedded derivatives are carried at fair value in “other long-term investments” and “other liabilities” on the Company’s consolidated condensed balance sheet. The changes in fair value are recorded in earnings as “Realized investment gains (losses)—Derivative financial instruments”. Refer to Note 16,15, Derivative Financial Instruments for more information related to each embedded derivatives gains and losses.

 

The fair value of the guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”)GMWB embedded derivative is derived through the income method of valuation using a valuation model that projects future cash flows using multiple risk neutral stochastic equity scenarios and policyholder behavior assumptions. The risk neutral scenarios are generated using the current swap curve and projected equity volatilities and correlations. The projected equity volatilities are based on a blend of historical volatility and near- term equity market implied volatilities. The equity correlations are based on historical price observations. For policyholder behavior assumptions, expected lapse and utilization assumptions are used and updated for actual experience, as necessary. The Company assumes age-based mortality from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners 1994 Variable Annuity MGDB Mortality Table for company experience, with attained age factors varying from 49%44.5% - 80%100%. The present value of the cash flows is determined using the discount rate curve, which is based upon LIBOR plus a credit spread (to represent the Company’s non-performance risk). As a result of using significant unobservable inputs, the GMWB embedded derivative is categorized as Level 3. These assumptions are reviewed on a quarterly basis.

 

The balance of the fixed indexed annuities (“FIA”)FIA embedded derivative is impacted by policyholder cash flows associated with the FIA product that are allocated to the embedded derivative in addition to changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative during the reporting period. The fair value of the FIA embedded derivative is derived through the income method of valuation using a valuation model that projects future cash flows using current index values and volatility, the hedge budget used to price the product, and policyholder assumptions (both elective and non-elective). For policyholder behavior assumptions, expected lapse and withdrawal assumptions are used and updated for actual experience, as necessary. The Company assumes age-based mortality from the 1994 Variable Annuity MGDB mortality table modified for company experience, with attained age factors varying from 49% - 80%. The present value of the cash flows is determined using the discount rate curve, which is based upon LIBOR up to one year and constant maturity treasury rates plus a credit spread (to represent the Company’s non-performance risk) thereafter. Policyholder assumptions are reviewed on an annual basis. As a result of using significant unobservable inputs, the FIA embedded derivative is categorized as Level 3.

 

The balance of the indexed universal life (“IUL”) embedded derivative is impacted by policyholder cash flows associated with the IUL product that are allocated to the embedded derivative in addition to changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative during the reporting period. The fair value of the IUL embedded derivative is derived through the income method of valuation using a valuation model that projects future cash flows using current index values and

 

4251



Table of Contents

 

volatility, the hedge budget used to price the product, and policyholder assumptions (both elective and non-elective). For policyholder behavior assumptions, expected lapse and withdrawal assumptions are used and updated for actual experience, as necessary. The Company assumes age-based mortality from the SOA 2008 VBT Primary Tables modified for company experience, with attained age factors varying from 37% - 74%. The present value of the cash flows is determined using the discount rate curve, which is based upon LIBOR up to one year and constant maturity treasury rates plus a credit spread (to represent the Company’s non-performance risk) thereafter. Policyholder assumptions are reviewed on an annual basis. As a result of using significant unobservable inputs, the IUL embedded derivative is categorized as Level 3.

 

The Company has assumed and ceded certain blocks of policies under modified coinsurance agreements in which the investment results of the underlying portfolios inure directly to the reinsurers. As a result, these agreements contain embedded derivatives that are reported at fair value. Changes in their fair value are reported in earnings. The investments supporting these agreements are designated as “trading securities”; therefore changes in their fair value are also reported in earnings. The fair value of the embedded derivative is the difference between the statutory policy liabilities (net of policy loans) of $2.6$2.5 billion and the fair value of the trading securities of $2.9$2.8 billion. As a result, changes in the fair value of the embedded derivatives are largely offset by the changes in fair value of the related investments and each are reported in earnings. The fair value of the embedded derivative is considered a Level 3 valuation due to the unobservable nature of the policy liabilities.

 

Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries have entered into interest support, a yearly renewable term (“YRT”) premium support, and portfolio maintenance agreements with PLC. These agreements meet the definition of a derivative and are accounted for at fair value and are considered Level 3 valuations. The fair value of these derivatives as of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) was $2.5$22.5 million and is included in Other long-term investments. For information regarding realized gains on these derivatives please refer to Note 16,15, Derivative Financial Instruments.

 

The Interest Support Agreement provides that PLC will make payments to Golden Gate II if actual investment income on certain of Golden Gate II’s asset portfolios falls below a calculated investment income amount as defined in the Interest Support Agreement. The calculated investment income amount is a level of investment income deemed to be sufficient to support certain of Golden Gate II’s obligations under a reinsurance agreement with the Company, dated July 1, 2007. The derivative is valued using an internal valuation model that assumes a conservative projection of investment income under an adverse interest rate scenario and the probability that the expectation falls below the calculated investment income amount. This derivative had a fair value of $0.6$20.0 million as of September 30, 2014. The assessmentMarch 31, 2015 (Successor Company), however, interest support agreement obligations to Golden Gate II of required payments from PLC underapproximately $1.9 million have been collateralized by PLC. Re-evaluation and, if necessary, adjustments of any support agreement collateralization amounts occur annually during the Interest Support Agreement occurs annually.first quarter pursuant to the terms of the support agreement. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015(Successor Company), no payments have been triggered under this agreement.

 

The YRT Premium support agreement provides that PLC will make payments to Golden Gate II in the event that YRT premium rates increase. The derivative is valued using an internal valuation model. The valuation model is a probability weighted discounted cash flow model. The value is primarily a function of the likelihood and severity of future YRT premium increases. The fair value of this derivative as of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) was $1.7$2.3 million. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), no payments have been triggered under this agreement.

 

The portfolio maintenance agreements provide that PLC will make payments to Golden Gate V and WCL in the event of other-than-temporary impairments on investments that exceed defined thresholds. The derivatives are valued using an internal discounted cash flow model. The significant unobservable inputs are the projected probability and severity of credit losses used to project future cash flows on the investment portfolios. The fair value of the portfolio maintenance agreements as of September 30,March 31, 2014 (Successor Company), was approximately $0.2 million. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), no payments have been triggered under this agreement.

43



Table of Contents

 

The Funds Withheld derivative results from a reinsurance agreement with Shades Creek where the economic performance of certain hedging instruments held by the Company is ceded to Shades Creek. The value of the Funds Withheld derivative is directly tied to the value of the hedging instruments held in the funds withheld account. The hedging instruments predominantly consist of derivative instruments the fair values of which are classified as a Level 2 measurement,measurement; as such, the fair value of the Funds Withheld derivative has been classified as a Level 2 measurement.

52



Table of Contents

The fair value of the Funds Withheld derivative as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) was a liability of $64.6$71.5 million.

 

Annuity account balancesAccount Balances

 

The Company records certain of its FIA reserves at fair value. The fair value is considered a Level 3 valuation. The FIA valuation model calculates the present value of future benefit cash flows less the projected future profits to quantify the net liability that is held as a reserve. This calculation is done using multiple risk neutral stochastic equity scenarios. The cash flows are discounted using LIBOR plus a credit spread. Best estimate assumptions are used for partial withdrawals, lapses, expenses and asset earned rate with a risk margin applied to each. These assumptions are reviewed at least annually as a part of the formal unlocking process. If an event were to occur within a quarter that would make the assumptions unreasonable, the assumptions would be reviewed within the quarter.

 

The discount rate for the fixed indexed annuities is based on an upward sloping rate curve which is updated each quarter. The discount rates for September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), ranged from a one month rate of 0.29%0.31%, a 5 year rate of 2.58%2.15%, and a 30 year rate of 4.21%3.38%. A credit spread component is also included in the calculation to accommodate non-performance risk.

 

Separate Accounts

 

Separate account assets are invested in open-ended mutual funds and are included in Level 1.

 

4453



Table of Contents

 

Valuation of Level 3 Financial Instruments

 

The following table presents the valuation method for material financial instruments included in Level 3, as well as the unobservable inputs used in the valuation of those financial instruments:

 

 

Successor

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of

 

Valuation

 

Unobservable

 

Range

 

As of

 

Valuation

 

Unobservable

 

Range

 

September 30, 2014

 

Technique

 

Input

 

(Weighted Average)

 

March 31, 2015

 

Technique

 

Input

 

(Weighted Average)

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

$

564,877

 

Discounted cash flow

 

Liquidity premium

 

0.59% - 1.49% (0.82%)

 

$

600,073

 

Discounted cash flow

 

Liquidity premium

 

0.52% - 1.50% (0.91%)

 

 

 

 

 

Paydown rate

 

9.29% - 15.18% (12.42%)

 

 

 

 

 

Paydown rate

 

9.70% - 16.93% (12.22%)

Corporate bonds

 

1,312,780

 

Discounted cash flow

 

Spread over treasury

 

0.51% - 5.75% (1.86%)

Embedded derivatives - GMWB(1)

 

 

42,035

 

Actuarial cash flow model

 

Mortality

 

49% to 80% of 1994 MGDB table

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate securities

 

1,238,548

 

Discounted cash flow

 

Spread over treasury

 

0.53% - 14.07% (2.45%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivatives - GMWB(1)

 

10,839

 

Actuarial cash flow model

 

Mortality

 

1994 MGDB table with

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

company experience

 

 

 

 

 

Lapse

 

0.29% - 17%, depending on

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

product/duration/funded

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

status of guarantee

 

 

 

 

 

Lapse

 

0% - 24%, depending on

 

 

 

 

 

Utilization

 

99%. 10% of policies have

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

product/duration/funded

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

a one-time over-utilization

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

status of guarantee

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

of 400%

 

 

 

 

 

Utilization

 

97% - 103%

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperformance risk

 

0.14% - 0.99%

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperformance risk

 

0.13% - 1.02%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

98,129

 

Actuarial cash flow model

 

Asset earned rate

 

3.86% - 5.92%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

97,108

 

Actuarial cash flow model

 

Asset earned rate

 

3.71% - 5.77%

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

$80 per policy

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

$88 - $102 per policy

 

 

 

 

 

Withdrawal rate

 

2.20%

 

 

 

 

 

Withdrawal rate

 

2.20%

 

 

 

 

 

Mortality

 

1994 MGDB table with

 

 

 

 

 

Mortality

 

49% to 80% of 1994 MGDB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

company experience

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

table

 

 

 

 

 

Lapse

 

2.2% - 33.0%, depending

 

 

 

 

 

Lapse

 

2.2% - 33.0%, depending on

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

on duration/surrender

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

duration/surrender charge

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

charge period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

period

 

 

 

 

 

Return on assets

 

1.50% - 1.85% depending on

 

 

 

 

 

Return on assets

 

1.50% - 1.85% depending on

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

surrender charge period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

surrender charge period

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperformance risk

 

0.14% - 0.99%

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperformance risk

 

0.13% - 1.02%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative - FIA

 

103,497

 

Actuarial cash flow model

 

Expenses

 

$83 - $97 per policy

 

83,119

 

Actuarial cash flow model

 

Expenses

 

$80 per policy

 

 

 

 

 

Withdrawal rate

 

1.1% - 4.5% depending on

 

 

 

 

 

Withdrawal rate

 

1.1% - 4.5% depending on

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

duration and tax

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

duration and tax qualification

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

qualification

 

 

 

 

 

Mortality

 

1994 MGDB table with

 

 

 

 

 

Mortality

 

49% - 80% of 1994 MGDB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

company experience

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

table

 

 

 

 

 

Lapse

 

2.5% - 40.0%, depending on

 

 

 

 

 

Lapse

 

2.5% - 40.0%, depending

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

on duration/surrender

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

on duration/surrender

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

charge period

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

charge period

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperformance risk

 

0.14% - 0.99%

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperformance risk

 

0.13% - 1.02%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative - IUL

 

2,609

 

Actuarial cash flow model

 

Mortality

 

37% - 74% of 2008

 

8,599

 

Actuarial cash flow model

 

Mortality

 

44% - 137% of 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VBT Primary Tables

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

VBT Primary Tables

 

 

 

 

 

Lapse

 

0.5% - 10.0%, depending on

 

 

 

 

 

Lapse

 

0.5% - 10.0%, depending on

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

duration/distribution channel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

duration/distribution channel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and smoking class

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

and smoking class

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperformance risk

 

0.13% - 1.02%

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperformance risk

 

0.14% - 0.99%

 


(1)The fair value for the GMWB embedded derivative is presented as a net asset for the purposes of this chart.asset. Excludes modified coinsurance agreements.arrangements.

(2)Represents liabilities related to fixed indexed annuities.

 

The chart above excludes Level 3 financial instruments that are valued using broker quotes and those which book value approximates fair value.

 

The Company has considered all reasonably available quantitative inputs as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), but the valuation techniques and inputs used by some brokers in pricing certain financial instruments are not shared with the Company. This resulted in $245.4$234.8 million of financial instruments being classified as Level 3 as of September 30, 2014. Of the $245.4 million, $171.2 million are other asset backed securities and $74.2 million are corporate bonds.

 

4554



Table of Contents

March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). Of the $234.8 million, $170.6 million are other asset backed securities and $64.2 million are corporate bonds

 

In certain cases the Company has determined that book value materially approximates fair value. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company held $84.4$66.7 million of financial instruments where book value approximates fair value. Of the $84.4$66.7 million, $66.7 millionthe entirety of this balance represents equity securities, which are predominantly FHLB stock $14.0 million represents corporate bonds and $3.7 million of other fixed maturity securities.

 

The following table presents the valuation method for material financial instruments included in Level 3, as well as the unobservable inputs used in the valuation of those financial instruments:

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of

 

Valuation

 

Unobservable

 

Range

 

 

December 31, 2013

 

Technique

 

Input

 

(Weighted Average)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

$

545,808

 

Discounted cash flow

 

Liquidity premium

 

1.00% - 1.68% (1.08%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Paydown rate

 

8.57% - 16.87% (12.05%)

Corporate bonds

 

1,555,898

 

Discounted cash flow

 

Spread over treasury

 

0.11% - 6.75% (2.06%)

Embedded derivatives - GMWB(1)

 

156,287

 

Actuarial cash flow model

 

Mortality

 

49% to 80% of 1994 MGDB table

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lapse

 

0% - 24%, depending on product/duration/funded status of guarantee

 

 

 

 

 

 

Utilization

 

97% - 103%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperformance risk

 

0.15% - 1.06%

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

107,000

 

Actuarial cash flow model

 

Asset earned rate

 

5.37%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Expenses

 

$88 - $102 per policy

 

 

 

 

 

 

Withdrawal rate

 

2.20%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortality

 

49% to 80% of 1994 MGDB table

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lapse

 

2.2% - 33.0%, depending on product/duration/funded status of guarantee

 

 

 

 

 

 

Return on assets

 

1.50% - 1.85% depending on surrender charge period

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperformance risk

 

0.15% - 1.06%

Embedded derivative - FIA

 

25,324

 

Actuarial cash flow model

 

Expenses

 

$83 - $97 per policy

 

 

 

 

 

 

Withdrawal rate

 

1.1% - 4.5% depending on duration and tax qualification

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortality

 

49% to 80% of 1994 MGDB table

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lapse

 

2.5% - 40.0%, depending on product/duration/funded status of guarantee

 

 

 

 

 

 

Nonperformance risk

 

0.15% - 1.06%

Predecessor

Company

Fair Value

As of

Valuation

Unobservable

Range

December 31, 2014

Technique

Input

(Weighted Average)

(Dollars In Thousands)

Assets:

Other asset-backed securities

$

 563,752

Discounted cash flow

Liquidity premium

0.39% - 1.49% (0.69%)

Paydown rate

9.70% - 15.80% (12.08%)

Corporate securities

1,282,864

Discounted cash flow

Spread over

0.33% - 7.50% (2.19%)

treasury

Liabilities:

Embedded derivatives - GMWB(1)

$

 25,927

Actuarial cash flow model

Mortality

44.5% to 100% of 1994

MGDB table

Lapse

0.25% - 17%, depending on

product/duration/funded

status of guarantee

Utilization

97% - 101%

Nonperformance risk

0.12% - 0.96%

Annuity account balances(2)

97,825

Actuarial cash flow model

Asset earned rate

3.86% - 5.92%

Expenses

$88 - $102 per policy

Withdrawal rate

2.20%

Mortality

49% to 80% of 1994

MGDB table

Lapse

2.2% - 33.0%, depending

on duration/surrender

charge period

Return on assets

1.50% - 1.85% depending on

surrender charge period

Nonperformance risk

0.12% - 0.96%

Embedded derivative - FIA

124,465

Actuarial cash flow model

Expenses

$83 - $97 per policy

Withdrawal rate

1.1% - 4.5% depending on

duration and tax qualification

Mortality

49% to 80% of 1994

MGDB table

Lapse

2.5% - 40.0%, depending

on duration/surrender

charge period

Nonperformance risk

0.12% - 0.96%

Embedded derivative - IUL

6,691

Actuarial cash flow model

Mortality

37% - 74% of 2008

VBT Primary Tables

Lapse

0.5% - 10%, depending

on duration/distribution

channel and smoking class

Nonperformance risk

0.12% - 0.96%

 


(1)The fair value for the GMWB embedded derivative is presented as a net asset for the purposes of this chart.liability. Excludes modified coinsurance agreements.arrangements.

(2)Represents account balance liabilities related to fixed indexed annuities.

 

4655



Table of Contents

 

The chart above excludes Level 3 financial instruments that are valued using broker quotes and those which book value approximates fair value.

 

The Company has considered all reasonably available quantitative inputs as of December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), but the valuation techniques and inputs used by some brokers in pricing certain financial instruments are not shared with the Company. This resulted in $216.0$237.2 million of financial instruments being classified as Level 3 as of December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company). Of the $216.0$237.2 million, $195.0$169.7 million are other asset-backedasset backed securities and $21.0$67.5 million are corporate bonds.

 

In certain cases the Company has determined that book value materially approximates fair value. As of December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), the Company held $73.9$70.4 million of financial instruments where book value approximates fair value. Of the $73.9$70.4 million, $68.0$66.7 million represents equity securities, which are predominantly FHLB stock, and $3.7 million of other fixed maturity securities, and $2.2 million of other corporate bonds.securities.

 

The asset-backed securities classified as Level 3 are predominantly ARS. A change in the paydown rate (the projected annual rate of principal reduction) of the ARS can significantly impact the fair value of these securities. A decrease in the paydown rate would increase the projected weighted average life of the ARS and increase the sensitivity of the ARS’ fair value to changes in interest rates. An increase in the liquidity premium would result in a decrease in the fair value of the securities, while a decrease in the liquidity premium would increase the fair value of these securities.

 

The fair value of corporate bonds classified as Level 3 is sensitive to changes in the interest rate spread over the corresponding U.S. Treasury rate. This spread represents a risk premium that is impacted by company specific and market factors. An increase in the spread can be caused by a perceived increase in credit risk of a specific issuer and/or an increase in the overall market risk premium associated with similar securities. The fair values of corporate bonds are sensitive to changes in spread. When holding the treasury rate constant, the fair value of corporate bonds increaseincreases when spreads decrease, and decreasedecreases when spreads increase.

 

The fair value of the GMWB embedded derivative is sensitive to changes in the discount rate which includes the Company’s nonperformance risk, volatility, lapse, and mortality assumptions. The volatility assumption is an observable input as it is based on market inputs. The Company’s nonperformance risk, lapse, and mortality are unobservable. An increase in the three unobservable assumptions would result in a decrease in the fair value of the liability and conversely, if there is a decrease in the assumptions the fair value would increase. The fair value is also dependent on the assumed policyholder utilization of the GMWB where an increase in assumed utilization would result in an increase in the fair value of the liability and conversely, if there is a decrease in the assumption, the fair value would decrease.

 

The fair value of the FIA account balance liability is predominantly impacted by observable inputs such as discount rates and equity returns. However, the fair value of the FIA account balance liabilityembedded derivative is sensitive to the asset earned rate and required return on assets,non-performance risk, which areis unobservable. The value of the liability increases with an increasedecreases in required return on assetsdiscount rate and a decreasenon-performance risk and decreases with increases in the asset earneddiscount rate and conversely,non-performance risk. The value of the value ofliability increases with increases in equity returns and the liability decreases with a decrease in required return on assets and an increase in the asset earned rate.equity returns.

 

The fair value of the FIA embedded derivative is predominantly impacted by observable inputs such as discount rates and equity returns. However, the fair value of the FIA embedded derivative is sensitive to non-performance risk, which is unobservable. The value of the liability increases with decreases in the discount rate and non-performance risk and decreases with increases in the discount rate and nonperformance risk. The value of the liability increases with increases in equity returns and the liability decreases with a decrease in equity returns.

 

The fair value of the IUL embedded derivative is predominantly impacted by observable inputs such as discount rates and equity returns. However, the fair value of the IUL embedded derivative is sensitive to non-performance risk.risk, which is unobservable. The value of the liability increases with decreases in the discount rate and non-performance risk and decreases with increases in the discount rate and nonperformance risk, which is unobservable.non-performance risk. The value of the liability increases with increases in equity returns and the liability decreases with a decrease in equity returns.

 

4756



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair value measurements for the three months ended September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), for which the Company has used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains (losses)

 

 

 

 

Total

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

included in

 

 

 

 

Realized and Unrealized

 

Realized and Unrealized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings

 

 

 

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

related to

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in

 

 

 

Included in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers

 

 

 

 

 

still held at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning

 

Included in

 

Comprehensive

 

Included in

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in/out of

 

 

 

Ending

 

the Reporting

 

 

 

 

Total
Realized and Unrealized
Gains

 

Total
Realized and Unrealized
Losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total
Gains
(losses)
included in
Earnings
related to
Instruments

 

 

Balance

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

Purchases

 

Sales

 

Issuances

 

Settlements

 

Level 3

 

Other

 

Balance

 

Date

 

 

Beginning
Balance

 

Included
in
Earnings

 

Included in
Other
Comprehensive
Income

 

Included
in
Earnings

 

Included in
Other
Comprehensive
Income

 

Purchases

 

Sales

 

Issuances

 

Settlements

 

Transfers
in/out of
Level 3

 

Other

 

Ending
Balance

 

still held at
the
Reporting
Date

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

10

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(1

)

$

 

$

(5

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

5

 

$

 

 

$

3

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

3

 

$

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

568,097

 

 

2,161

 

(71

)

(4,299

)

 

(140

)

 

 

 

(380

)

565,368

 

 

 

603,646

 

 

 

 

(3,568

)

 

(40

)

 

 

 

94

 

600,132

 

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States, municipals, and political subdivisions

 

3,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,675

 

 

 

3,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3,675

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

1,524,297

 

201

 

8,435

 

 

(9,452

)

11,797

 

(59,352

)

 

 

(96,565

)

(1,555

)

1,377,806

 

 

Corporate securities

 

1,307,259

 

635

 

11,618

 

 

 

22,000

 

(35,787

)

 

 

(20,050

)

(2,533

)

1,283,142

 

 

Total fixed maturity securities - available-for-sale

 

2,096,079

 

201

 

10,596

 

(71

)

(13,752

)

11,797

 

(59,497

)

 

 

(96,565

)

(1,934

)

1,946,854

 

 

 

1,914,583

 

635

 

11,618

 

 

(3,568

)

22,000

 

(39,502

)

 

 

(20,050

)

(2,439

)

1,883,277

 

 

Fixed maturity securities - trading

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

842

 

11

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(853

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

176,386

 

1,834

 

 

(837

)

 

 

(7,137

)

 

 

 

430

 

170,676

 

1,287

 

 

169,473

 

3,360

 

 

 

 

 

(2,408

)

 

 

 

75

 

170,500

 

(1,242

)

U.S. government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States, municipals and political subdivisions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

31,520

 

182

 

 

(676

)

 

 

(5,583

)

 

 

(2,518

)

252

 

23,177

 

234

 

Corporate securities

 

25,130

 

34

 

 

(66

)

 

 

(5,423

)

 

 

 

(61

)

19,614

 

(1,087

)

Total fixed maturity securities - trading

 

208,748

 

2,027

 

 

(1,513

)

 

 

(12,720

)

 

 

(3,371

)

682

 

193,853

 

1,521

 

 

194,603

 

3,394

 

 

(66

)

 

 

(7,831

)

 

 

 

14

 

190,114

 

(2,329

)

Total fixed maturity securities

 

2,304,827

 

2,228

 

10,596

 

(1,584

)

(13,752

)

11,797

 

(72,217

)

 

 

(99,936

)

(1,252

)

2,140,707

 

1,521

 

 

2,109,186

 

4,029

 

11,618

 

(66

)

(3,568

)

22,000

 

(47,333

)

 

 

(20,050

)

(2,425

)

2,073,391

 

(2,329

)

Equity securities

 

77,882

 

 

 

 

(91

)

 

(445

)

 

 

(10,651

)

 

66,695

 

 

 

66,691

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66,691

 

 

Other long-term investments(1)

 

67,222

 

895

 

 

(6,843

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61,274

 

(5,948

)

Other long-term investments(1)

 

64,200

 

15,050

 

 

(28

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

79,222

 

15,022

 

Short-term investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total investments

 

2,449,931

 

3,123

 

10,596

 

(8,427

)

(13,843

)

11,797

 

(72,662

)

 

 

(110,587

)

(1,252

)

2,268,676

 

(4,427

)

 

2,240,077

 

19,079

 

11,618

 

(94

)

(3,568

)

22,000

 

(47,333

)

 

 

(20,050

)

(2,425

)

2,219,304

 

12,693

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

2,449,931

 

$

3,123

 

$

10,596

 

$

(8,427

)

$

(13,843

)

$

11,797

 

$

(72,662

)

$

 

$

 

$

(110,587

)

$

(1,252

)

$

2,268,676

 

$

(4,427

)

 

$

2,240,077

 

$

19,079

 

$

11,618

 

$

(94

)

$

(3,568

)

$

22,000

 

$

(47,333

)

$

 

$

 

$

(20,050

)

$

(2,425

)

$

2,219,304

 

$

12,693

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

102,456

 

$

862

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

125

 

$

3,590

 

$

 

$

 

$

98,129

 

$

 

Other liabilities(1)

 

399,669

 

22,317

 

 

(42,833

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

420,185

 

(20,516

)

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

98,279

 

$

 

$

 

$

(632

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

14

 

$

1,817

 

$

 

$

 

$

97,108

 

$

 

Other liabilities(1)

 

530,118

 

64,891

 

 

(12,502

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

477,729

 

52,389

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

502,125

 

$

23,179

 

$

 

$

(42,833

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

125

 

$

3,590

 

$

 

$

 

$

518,314

 

$

(20,516

)

 

$

628,397

 

$

64,891

 

$

 

$

(13,134

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

14

 

$

1,817

 

$

 

$

 

$

574,837

 

$

52,389

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)Represents certain freestanding and embedded derivatives.

(2)Represents liabilities related to fixed indexed annuities.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), there were no transfers fromof securities into Level 2 to level 3.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2014, there were $110.6period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), $20.1 million of securities were transferred out ofinto Level 3.2. This amount was transferred tofrom Level 2.3. These transfers resulted from securities that were priced internally using significant unobservable inputs where market observable inputs were no longer available in previous periods but are nowwere priced by independent pricing services or brokers using no significant unobservable inputs as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2014, thereperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), $90.4 million of securities were no transferstransferred from Level 2 to Level 1.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), there were no transfers from Level 1.

 

4857



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair value measurements for the three months ended September 30, 2013,period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), for which the Company has used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains (losses)

 

 

 

 

Total

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

included in

 

 

 

 

Realized and Unrealized

 

Realized and Unrealized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings

 

 

 

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

related to

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in

 

 

 

Included in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers

 

 

 

 

 

still held at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning

 

Included in

 

Comprehensive

 

Included in

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in/out of

 

 

 

Ending

 

the Reporting

 

 

 

 

Total
Realized and Unrealized
Gains

 

Total
Realized and Unrealized
Losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total
Gains
(losses)
included in
Earnings
related to
Instruments

 

 

Balance

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

Purchases

 

Sales

 

Issuances

 

Settlements

 

Level 3

 

Other

 

Balance

 

Date

 

 

Beginning
Balance

 

Included
in
Earnings

 

Included in
Other
Comprehensive
Income

 

Included
in
Earnings

 

Included in
Other
Comprehensive
Income

 

Purchases

 

Sales

 

Issuances

 

Settlements

 

Transfers
in/out of
Level 3

 

Other

 

Ending
Balance

 

still held at
the
Reporting
Date

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

14,062

 

$

 

$

1,310

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(12

)

$

 

$

 

$

(15,333

)

$

11

 

$

38

 

$

 

 

$

3

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

3

 

$

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

576,396

 

 

52

 

 

(26,969

)

11,769

 

(12,085

)

 

 

 

(392

)

548,771

 

 

 

563,961

 

 

 

 

(3,867

)

 

(32

)

 

 

43,205

 

379

 

603,646

 

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States, municipals, and political subdivisions

 

4,275

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,275

 

 

 

3,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,675

 

 

Other government-related securities

 

20,000

 

 

1

 

 

 

 

(20,000

)

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

194,895

 

 

1,662

 

 

(3,513

)

11,002

 

(13,558

)

 

 

(3,385

)

385

 

187,488

 

 

Corporate securities

 

1,325,683

 

 

12,282

 

 

(23,029

)

 

(7,062

)

 

 

 

(615

)

1,307,259

 

 

Total fixed maturity securities - available-for-sale

 

809,628

 

 

3,025

 

 

(30,482

)

22,771

 

(45,655

)

 

 

(18,718

)

3

 

740,572

 

 

 

1,893,322

 

 

12,282

 

 

(26,896

)

 

(7,094

)

 

 

43,205

 

(236

)

1,914,583

 

 

Fixed maturity securities - trading

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

1,582

 

 

 

(1

)

 

 

(72

)

 

 

(1,494

)

(15

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

168,851

 

3,167

 

 

(1,080

)

 

16,394

 

(16,568

)

 

 

 

203

 

170,967

 

1,596

 

 

169,461

 

586

 

 

(139

)

 

 

(472

)

 

 

 

37

 

169,473

 

447

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States, municipals and political subdivisions

 

3,500

 

 

 

(123

)

 

 

 

 

 

(3,377

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

5,092

 

 

 

(4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

4

 

5,092

 

(4

)

Corporate securities

 

24,744

 

602

 

 

(196

)

 

 

(20

)

 

 

 

 

25,130

 

406

 

Total fixed maturity securities - trading

 

179,025

 

3,167

 

 

(1,208

)

 

16,394

 

(16,640

)

 

 

(4,871

)

192

 

176,059

 

1,592

 

 

194,205

 

1,188

 

 

(335

)

 

 

(492

)

 

 

 

37

 

194,603

 

853

 

Total fixed maturity securities

 

988,653

 

3,167

 

3,025

 

(1,208

)

(30,482

)

39,165

 

(62,295

)

 

 

(23,589

)

195

 

916,631

 

1,592

 

 

2,087,527

 

1,188

 

12,282

 

(335

)

(26,896

)

 

(7,586

)

 

 

43,205

 

(199

)

2,109,186

 

853

 

Equity securities

 

65,527

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65,527

 

 

 

66,691

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

66,691

 

 

Other long-term investments(1)

 

47,838

 

36,917

 

(1,750

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

83,005

 

35,167

 

Other long-term investments(1)

 

44,625

 

16,617

 

 

(15,166

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

46,076

 

1,451

 

Short-term investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total investments

 

1,102,018

 

40,084

 

1,275

 

(1,208

)

(30,482

)

39,165

 

(62,295

)

 

 

(23,589

)

195

 

1,065,163

 

36,759

 

 

2,198,843

 

17,805

 

12,282

 

(15,501

)

(26,896

)

 

(7,586

)

 

 

43,205

 

(199

)

2,221,953

 

2,304

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

1,102,018

 

$

40,084

 

$

1,275

 

$

(1,208

)

$

(30,482

)

$

39,165

 

$

(62,295

)

$

 

$

 

$

(23,589

)

$

195

 

$

1,065,163

 

$

36,759

 

 

$

2,198,843

 

$

17,805

 

$

12,282

 

$

(15,501

)

$

(26,896

)

$

 

$

(7,586

)

$

 

$

 

$

43,205

 

$

(199

)

$

2,221,953

 

$

2,304

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

114,614

 

$

 

$

(2,472

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

46

 

$

6,542

 

$

 

$

 

$

110,590

 

$

 

Other liabilities(1)

 

256,776

 

39,109

 

(13,056

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

230,723

 

26,053

 

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

97,825

 

$

 

$

 

$

(536

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

7

 

$

419

 

$

 

$

 

$

97,949

 

$

 

Other liabilities(1)

 

506,343

 

61

 

 

(125,995

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

632,277

 

(125,934

)

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

371,390

 

$

39,109

 

$

(15,528

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

46

 

$

6,542

 

$

 

$

 

$

341,313

 

$

26,053

 

 

$

604,168

 

$

61

 

$

 

$

(126,531

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

7

 

$

419

 

$

 

$

 

$

730,226

 

$

(125,934

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)Represents certain freestanding and embedded derivatives.

(2)Represents liabilities related to fixed indexed annuities.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, $1.3period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Successor Company), $43.2 million of securities were transferred into Level 3. This amount was transferred from Level 2. These transfers resulted from securities that were priced by independent pricing services or brokers in previous periods, using no significant unobservable inputs, but were priced internally using significant unobservable inputs where market observable inputs were no longer available as of September 30, 2013.January 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2013, $24.9 millionperiod of securitiesJanuary 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), there were transferred out of Level 3. This amount was transferredno transfers into Level 2. These transfers resulted from securities priced by independent pricing services or brokers as of September 30, 2013 that were previously priced internally using significant unobservable inputs where market observable inputs were not available.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2013,period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), there were no transfers from Level 2 to Level 1.

 

For the three months ended September 30, 2013,period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), there were no transfers out offrom Level 1.

 

4958



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair value measurements for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), for which the Company has used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains (losses)

 

 

 

 

Total

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

included in

 

 

 

 

Realized and Unrealized

 

Realized and Unrealized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings

 

 

 

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

related to

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in

 

 

 

Included in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers

 

 

 

 

 

still held at

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Beginning

 

Included in

 

Comprehensive

 

Included in

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in/out of

 

 

 

Ending

 

the Reporting

 

 

 

 

Total
Realized and Unrealized
Gains

 

Total
Realized and Unrealized
Losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total
Gains
(losses)
included in
Earnings
related to
Instruments

 

 

Balance

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

Purchases

 

Sales

 

Issuances

 

Settlements

 

Level 3

 

Other

 

Balance

 

Date

 

 

Beginning
Balance

 

Included in
Earnings

 

Included in
Other
Comprehensive
Income

 

Included
in
Earnings

 

Included in
Other
Comprehensive
Income

 

Purchases

 

Sales

 

Issuances

 

Settlements

 

Transfers
in/out of
Level 3

 

Other

 

Ending
Balance

 

still held at
the
Reporting
Date

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

28

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(1

)

$

 

$

(23

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

5

 

$

 

 

$

28

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

1

 

$

(11

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(1

)

$

17

 

$

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

545,808

 

 

36,227

 

(71

)

(5,532

)

 

(9,934

)

 

 

 

(1,130

)

565,368

 

 

 

545,808

 

 

4,137

 

 

(1,129

)

 

(260

)

 

 

 

249

 

548,805

 

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States, municipals, and political subdivisions

 

3,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,675

 

 

 

3,675

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3,675

 

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

1,549,940

 

1,170

 

62,723

 

 

(16,717

)

102,029

 

(162,391

)

 

 

(151,858

)

(7,090

)

1,377,806

 

 

Corporate securities

 

1,549,940

 

895

 

27,017

 

 

(5,015

)

29,387

 

(37,867

)

 

 

12,185

 

(2,832

)

1,573,710

 

 

Total fixed maturity securities - available-for-sale

 

2,099,451

 

1,170

 

98,950

 

(71

)

(22,250

)

102,029

 

(172,348

)

 

 

(151,858

)

(8,219

)

1,946,854

 

 

 

2,099,451

 

895

 

31,154

 

 

(6,144

)

29,388

 

(38,138

)

 

 

12,185

 

(2,584

)

2,126,207

 

 

Fixed maturity securities - trading

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

11

 

 

 

 

842

 

 

 

 

(853

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

194,977

 

8,685

 

 

(3,951

)

 

 

(29,832

)

 

 

 

797

 

170,676

 

1,959

 

 

194,977

 

727

 

 

(428

)

 

 

(812

)

 

 

 

200

 

194,664

 

468

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States, municipals and political subdivisions

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

29,199

 

1,060

 

 

(729

)

 

4,059

 

(10,693

)

 

 

4

 

277

 

23,177

 

(1

)

Corporate securities

 

29,199

 

538

 

 

(13

)

 

 

(63

)

 

 

1,272

 

13

 

30,946

 

(4

)

Total fixed maturity securities - trading

 

224,176

 

9,756

 

 

(4,680

)

 

4,901

 

(40,525

)

 

 

(849

)

1,074

 

193,853

 

1,958

 

 

224,176

 

1,265

 

 

(441

)

 

 

(875

)

 

 

1,272

 

213

 

225,610

 

464

 

Total fixed maturity securities

 

2,323,627

 

10,926

 

98,950

 

(4,751

)

(22,250

)

106,930

 

(212,873

)

 

 

(152,707

)

(7,145

)

2,140,707

 

1,958

 

 

2,323,627

 

2,160

 

31,154

 

(441

)

(6,144

)

29,388

 

(39,013

)

 

 

13,457

 

(2,371

)

2,351,817

 

464

 

Equity securities

 

67,979

 

 

1,192

 

 

(257

)

9,551

 

(1,119

)

 

 

(10,651

)

 

66,695

 

 

 

67,979

 

 

227

 

 

(166

)

9,551

 

 

 

 

 

 

77,591

 

 

Other long-term investments(1)

 

98,886

 

1,320

 

 

(38,932

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

61,274

 

(37,612

)

Other long-term investments(1)

 

98,886

 

111

 

 

(23,284

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

75,713

 

(23,173

)

Short-term investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total investments

 

2,490,492

 

12,246

 

100,142

 

(43,683

)

(22,507

)

116,481

 

(213,992

)

 

 

(163,358

)

(7,145

)

2,268,676

 

1,958

 

 

2,490,492

 

2,271

 

31,381

 

(23,725

)

(6,310

)

38,939

 

(39,013

)

 

 

13,457

 

(2,371

)

2,505,121

 

(22,709

)

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

2,490,492

 

$

12,246

 

$

100,142

 

$

(43,683

)

$

(22,507

)

$

116,481

 

$

(213,992

)

$

 

$

 

$

(163,358

)

$

(7,145

)

$

2,268,676

 

$

1,958

 

 

$

2,490,492

 

$

2,271

 

$

31,381

 

$

(23,725

)

$

(6,310

)

$

38,939

 

$

(39,013

)

$

 

$

 

$

13,457

 

$

(2,371

)

$

2,505,121

 

$

(22,709

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

107,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

(2,261

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

300

 

$

11,432

 

$

 

$

 

$

98,129

 

$

 

Other liabilities(1)

 

233,738

 

22,342

 

 

(208,789

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

420,185

 

(186,447

)

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

107,000

 

$

 

$

 

$

(1,409

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

112

 

$

2,928

 

$

 

$

 

$

105,593

 

$

 

Other liabilities(1)

 

233,738

 

12

 

 

(74,823

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

308,549

 

(74,811

)

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

340,738

 

$

22,342

 

$

 

$

(211,050

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

300

 

$

11,432

 

$

 

$

 

$

518,314

 

$

(186,447

)

 

$

340,738

 

$

12

 

$

 

$

(76,232

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

112

 

$

2,928

 

$

 

$

 

$

414,142

 

$

(74,811

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


(1)Represents certain freestanding and embedded derivatives.

(2)Represents liabilities related to fixed indexed annuities.

 

For the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2014 $31.0(Predecessor Company), $29.7 million of securities were transferred into Level 3. This amount was transferred from Level 2. These transfers resulted from securities that were priced by independent pricing services or brokers in previous periods, using no significant unobservable inputs, but were priced internally using significant unobservable inputs where market observable inputs were no longer available as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company). All transfers are recognized as of the end of the period.

 

For the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2014 there were $194.4 million of securities transferred out of Level 3. This amount was transferred to Level 2. These transfers resulted from securities that were priced using significant unobservable inputs in previous periods, but are now priced by independent pricing services or brokers, using no significant unobservable inputs as of September 30, 2014.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, there were no transfers from Level 2 to Level 1.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, there were no transfers out of Level 1.

50



Table of Contents

The following table presents a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for fair value measurements for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, for which the Company has used significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains (losses)

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

Total

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

included in

 

 

 

 

 

Realized and Unrealized

 

Realized and Unrealized

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Earnings

 

 

 

 

 

Gains

 

Losses

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

related to

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Included in

 

 

 

Included in

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Instruments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

Other

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Transfers

 

 

 

 

 

still held at

 

 

 

Beginning

 

Included in

 

Comprehensive

 

Included in

 

Comprehensive

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

in/out of

 

 

 

Ending

 

the Reporting

 

 

 

Balance

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

Earnings

 

Income

 

Purchases

 

Sales

 

Issuances

 

Settlements

 

Level 3

 

Other

 

Balance

 

Date

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

$

4

 

$

 

$

1,310

 

$

 

$

(337

)

$

14,349

 

$

(12

)

$

 

$

 

$

(15,287

)

$

11

 

$

38

 

$

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

596,143

 

 

43,808

 

 

(54,517

)

24,931

 

(62,471

)

 

 

1,227

 

(350

)

548,771

 

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States, municipals, and political subdivisions

 

4,275

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,275

 

 

Other government-related securities

 

20,011

 

 

2

 

 

(3

)

 

(20,000

)

 

 

 

(10

)

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

167,892

 

116

 

2,673

 

 

(13,559

)

29,277

 

(58,742

)

 

 

58,945

 

886

 

187,488

 

 

Total fixed maturity securities - available-for-sale

 

788,325

 

116

 

47,793

 

 

(68,416

)

68,557

 

(141,225

)

 

 

44,885

 

537

 

740,572

 

 

Fixed maturity securities - trading

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

(1

)

 

1,582

 

(72

)

 

 

(1,494

)

(15

)

 

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

70,535

 

7,964

 

 

(3,949

)

 

122,224

 

(29,344

)

 

 

2,210

 

1,327

 

170,967

 

4,814

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States, municipals and political subdivisions

 

 

 

 

(123

)

 

3,500

 

 

 

 

(3,377

)

 

 

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Corporate bonds

 

115

 

1

 

 

(27

)

 

 

(17

)

 

 

5,013

 

7

 

5,092

 

(4

)

Total fixed maturity securities - trading

 

70,650

 

7,965

 

 

(4,100

)

 

127,306

 

(29,433

)

 

 

2,352

 

1,319

 

176,059

 

4,810

 

Total fixed maturity securities

 

858,975

 

8,081

 

47,793

 

(4,100

)

(68,416

)

195,863

 

(170,658

)

 

 

47,237

 

1,856

 

916,631

 

4,810

 

Equity securities

 

65,527

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

65,527

 

 

Other long-term investments(1)

 

48,655

 

84,176

 

(15,733

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(34,093

)

83,005

 

68,443

 

Short-term investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total investments

 

973,157

 

92,257

 

32,060

 

(4,100

)

(68,416

)

195,863

 

(170,658

)

 

 

47,237

 

(32,237

)

1,065,163

 

73,253

 

Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

973,157

 

$

92,257

 

$

32,060

 

$

(4,100

)

$

(68,416

)

$

195,863

 

$

(170,658

)

$

 

$

 

$

47,237

 

$

(32,237

)

$

1,065,163

 

$

73,253

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Annuity account balances(2)

 

$

129,468

 

$

 

$

(6,159

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

247

 

$

25,284

 

$

 

$

 

$

110,590

 

$

 

Other liabilities(1)

 

611,437

 

277,319

 

(31,110

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

134,505

 

230,723

 

246,209

 

Total liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis

 

$

740,905

 

$

277,319

 

$

(37,269

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

247

 

$

25,284

 

$

 

$

134,505

 

$

341,313

 

$

246,209

 


(1)Represents certain freestanding and embedded derivatives.

(2)Represents liabilities related to fixed indexed annuities.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, $72.1(Predecessor Company), $16.2 million of securities were transferred into Level 3.2. This amount was transferred from Level 2.3. These transfers resulted from securities that were priced by independent pricing services or brokers in previous periods, using no significant unobservable inputs, but were priced internally using significant unobservable inputs where market observable inputs were no longer available as of September 30, 2013. All transfers are recognized as of the end of the period.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, $24.9 million of securitiesin previous periods but were transferred out of Level 3. This amount was transferred into Level 2. These transfers resulted from securities priced by independent pricing services or brokers as of September 30, 2013 that were priced internally using significant unobservable inputs where market observable inputs were not available during previous periods.March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2013,March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), there were no transfers from Level 2 to Level 1.

 

59



Table of Contents

For the ninethree months ended September 30, 2013,March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), there were no transfers out of Level 1.

 

Total realized and unrealized gains (losses) on Level 3 assets and liabilities are primarily reported in either realized investment gains (losses) within the consolidated condensed statements of income (loss) or other comprehensive income (loss) within shareowners’shareowner’s equity based on the appropriate accounting treatment for the item.

51



Table of Contents

 

Purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements, net, represent the activity that occurred during the period that results in a change of the asset or liability but does not represent changes in fair value for the instruments held at the beginning of the period. Such activity primarily relates to purchases and sales of fixed maturity securities and issuances and settlements of fixed indexed annuities.

 

The Company reviews the fair value hierarchy classifications each reporting period. Changes in the observability of the valuation attributes may result in a reclassification of certain financial assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in and out of Level 3 at the beginning fair value for the reporting period in which the changes occur. The asset transfers in the table(s) above primarily related to positions moved from Level 3 to Level 2 as the Company determined that certain inputs were observable.

 

The amount of total gains (losses) for assets and liabilities still held as of the reporting date primarily represents changes in fair value of trading securities and certain derivatives that exist as of the reporting date and the change in fair value of fixed indexed annuities.

 

Estimated Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments as of the periods shown below are as follows:

 

 

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

 

 

As of

 

 

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

Fair Value

 

Carrying

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

Fair Value

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

Carrying

 

 

 

 

Level

 

Amounts

 

Fair Values

 

Amounts

 

Fair Values

 

 

Level

 

Amounts

 

Fair Values

 

 

Amounts

 

Fair Values

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Assets:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mortgage loans on real estate

 

3

 

$

5,232,463

 

$

5,727,368

 

$

5,493,492

 

$

5,956,133

 

 

3

 

$

5,589,795

 

$

5,594,230

 

 

$

5,133,780

 

$

5,524,059

 

Policy loans

 

3

 

1,767,228

 

1,767,228

 

1,815,744

 

1,815,744

 

 

3

 

1,735,370

 

1,735,370

 

 

1,758,237

 

1,758,237

 

Fixed maturities, held-to-maturity(1)

 

3

 

415,000

 

453,741

 

365,000

 

335,676

 

 

3

 

551,320

 

528,828

 

 

435,000

 

458,422

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stable value product account balances

 

3

 

$

2,261,546

 

$

2,278,155

 

$

2,559,552

 

$

2,566,209

 

 

3

 

$

1,923,684

 

$

1,924,552

 

 

$

1,959,488

 

$

1,973,624

 

Annuity account balances

 

3

 

11,083,763

 

10,667,467

 

11,125,253

 

10,639,637

 

 

3

 

10,846,606

 

10,285,821

 

 

10,950,729

 

10,491,775

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Debt:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Non-recourse funding obligations(2)

 

3

 

$

1,539,415

 

$

1,562,509

 

$

1,495,448

 

$

1,272,425

 

 

3

 

$

1,914,016

 

$

1,712,167

 

 

$

1,527,752

 

$

1,753,183

 

 


Except as noted below, fair values were estimated using quoted market prices.

(1)              Security purchased from unconsolidated subsidiary, Red Mountain LLC.

(2)              Of this carrying amount, $415.0$455.0 million, fair value of $431.1$502.1 million, as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), and $365.0$435.0 million, fair value of $321.5$461.4 million, as of December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), relates to non-recourse funding obligations issued by Golden Gate V.

 

60



Table of Contents

Fair Value Measurements

 

Mortgage loans on real estate

 

The Company estimates the fair value of mortgage loans using an internally developed model. This model includes inputs derived by the Company based on assumed discount rates relative to the Company’s current mortgage loan lending rate and an expected cash flow analysis based on a review of the mortgage loan terms. The model also contains the Company’s determined representative risk adjustment assumptions related to credit and liquidity risks.

 

Policy loans

 

The Company believes the fair value of policy loans approximates book value. Policy loans are funds provided to policy holders in return for a claim on the policy. The funds provided are limited to the cash surrender value of the underlying policy. The nature of policy loans is to have a negligible default risk as the loans are fully collateralized by

52



Table of Contents

the value of the policy. Policy loans do not have a stated maturity and the balances and accrued interest are repaid either by the policyholder or with proceeds from the policy. Due to the collateralized nature of policy loans and unpredictable timing of repayments, the Company believes the fair value of policy loans approximates carrying value.

 

Fixed maturities, held-to-maturity

 

The Company estimates the fair value of its fixed maturity, held-to-maturity securities using internal discounted cash flow models. The discount rates used in the model were based on a current market yield for similar financial instruments.

 

Stable value productValue Product and Annuity account balancesAccount Balances

 

The Company estimates the fair value of stable value product account balances and annuity account balances using models based on discounted expected cash flows. The discount rates used in the models were based on a current market rate for similar financial instruments.

 

Non-recourse funding obligationsFunding Obligations

 

The Company estimates the fair value of its non-recourse funding obligations using internal discounted cash flow models. The discount rates used in the model were based on a current market yield for similar financial instruments.

16.15.                               DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

Types of Derivative Instruments and Derivative Strategies

 

The Company utilizes a risk management strategy that incorporates the use of derivative financial instruments to reduce exposure to certain risks, including but not limited to, interest rate risk, inflation risk, currency exchange risk, volatility risk, and equity market risk. These strategies are developed through the Company’s analysis of data from financial simulation models and other internal and industry sources, and are then incorporated into the Company’s risk management program.

 

Derivative instruments expose the Company to credit and market risk and could result in material changes from period to period. The Company attempts to minimize its credit risk by entering into transactions with highly rated counterparties. The Company manages the market risk by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degrees of risk that may be undertaken. The Company monitors its use of derivatives in connection with its overall asset/liability management programs and risk management strategies. In addition, all derivative programs are monitored by our risk management department.

 

61



Table of Contents

Derivatives Related to Interest Rate Risk Management

 

Derivative instruments that are used as part of the Company’s interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swaps, interest rate futures, interest rate caps, and interest rate swaptions. The Company’s inflation risk management strategy involves the use of swaps that requires the Company to pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate that is based on changes in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”).

 

Derivatives Related to Risk Mitigation of CertainVariable Annuity Contracts

 

The Company may use the following types of derivative contracts to mitigate its exposure to certain guaranteed benefits related to variable annuity contracts andVA, fixed indexed annuities:annuity, and indexed universal life contracts:

 

·                  Foreign Currency Futures

·                  Variance Swaps

·                  Interest Rate Futures

·                  Equity Options

·                  Equity Futures

53



Table of Contents

·                  Credit Derivatives

·                  Interest Rate Swaps

·                  Interest Rate Swaptions

·                  Volatility Futures

·                  Volatility Options

·                  Funds Withheld Agreement

·                  Total Return Swaps

 

Other Derivatives

 

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have derivatives with PLC. These derivatives consist of an interest support agreement, a YRT premium support agreement, and portfolio maintenance agreements with PLC.

 

The Company has a funds withheld account that consists of various derivative instruments held by us that is used to hedge the GMWB and GMDB riders. The economic performance of derivatives in the funds withheld account is ceded to Shades Creek. The funds withheld account is accounted for as a derivative financial instrument.

 

Accounting for Derivative Instruments

 

The Company records its derivative financial instruments in the consolidated condensed balance sheet in “other long-term investments” and “other liabilities” in accordance with GAAP, which requires that all derivative instruments be recognized in the balance sheet at fair value. The change in the fair value of derivative financial instruments is reported either in the statement of income or in other comprehensive income (loss), depending upon whether it qualified  for and also has been properly identified as being part of a hedging relationship, and also on the type of hedging relationship that exists.

 

For a derivative financial instrument to be accounted for as an accounting hedge, it must be identified and documented as such on the date of designation. For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of their realized gain or loss is reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period during which the hedged item impacts earnings. Any remaining gain or loss, the ineffective portion, is recognized in current earnings. For fair value hedge derivatives, their gain or loss as well as the offsetting loss or gain attributable to the hedged risk of the hedged item is recognized in current earnings. Effectiveness of the Company’s hedge relationships is assessed on a quarterly basis.

 

The Company reports changes in fair values of derivatives that are not part of a qualifying hedge relationship through earnings in the period of change. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are recognized in current earnings are reported in “Realized investment gains (losses) - Derivative financial instruments”.

 

62



Table of Contents

Derivative Instruments Designated and Qualifying as Hedging Instruments

 

Cash-Flow Hedges

 

·                  In connection with the issuance of inflation-adjusted funding agreements, the Company has entered into swaps to essentially convert the floating CPI-linked interest rate on these agreements to a fixed rate. The Company pays a fixed rate on the swap and receives a floating rate primarily determined by the period’s change in the CPI. The amounts that are received on the swaps are almost equal to the amounts that are paid on the agreements.

 

Derivative Instruments Not Designated and Not Qualifying as Hedging Instruments

 

The Company uses various other derivative instruments for risk management purposes that do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment. Changes in the fair value of these derivatives are recognized in earnings during the period of change.

 

54



Table of Contents

Derivatives Related to Variable Annuity Contracts

 

·                  The Company uses equity, interest rate, currency, and volatility futures to mitigate the risk related to certain guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWB, within its VA products. In general, the cost of such benefits varies with the level of equity and interest rate markets, foreign currency levels, and overall volatility. No volatility future positions were held as of September 30, 2014.

 

·                  The Company uses equity options, variance swaps, and volatility options to mitigate the risk related to certain guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWB, within its variable annuityVA products. In general, the cost of such benefits varies with the level of equity markets and overall volatility. No volatility option positions were held as of September 30, 2014.

 

·                  The Company uses interest rate swaps and interest rate swaptions to mitigate the risk related to certain guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWB, within its VA products.

 

·                  The Company markets certain VA products with a GMWB rider. The GMWB component is considered an embedded derivative, not considered to be clearly and closely related to the host contract.

 

·                  The Company has a funds withheld account that consists of various derivative instruments held by the Company that are used to hedge the GMWB and GMDB riders. The economic performance of derivatives in the funds withheld account is ceded to Shades Creek. The funds withheld account is accounted for as a derivative financial instrument.

 

Derivatives Related to Fixed Annuity Contracts

 

·                  The Company usesused equity, futures, and volatility futuresoptions to mitigate the risk within its fixed indexed annuity products. In general, the cost of such benefits varies with the level of equity and overall volatility.

 

·                  The Company uses equity options to mitigate the risk within its fixed indexed annuity products. In general, the cost of such benefits varies with the level of equity markets.

 

·                  The Company markets certain fixed indexed annuity products. The FIA component is considered an embedded derivative, not considered to be clearly and closely related to the host contract.

 

Other Derivatives Related to Indexed Universal Life Contracts

 

·                  The Company uses certain interest rate swapsequity, futures, and options to mitigate the price volatilityrisk within its indexed universal life products. In general, the cost of fixed maturities.  Nonesuch benefits varies with the level of these positions were held as of September 30, 2014.equity markets.

 

·63



The Company purchased interest rate caps to mitigate its risk with respect to the Company’s LIBOR exposure and the potential impactTable of European financial market distress. None of these positions were held as of September 30, 2014.

·The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have an interest support agreement, YRT premium support agreement, and two portfolio maintenance agreements with PLC.

·The Company uses various swaps and other types of derivatives to manage risk related to other exposures.Contents

 

·                  The Company markets certain IUL products. The IUL component is considered an embedded derivative, not considered to be clearly and closely related to the host contract.

Other Derivatives

·The Company uses certain interest rate swaps to mitigate the price volatility of fixed maturities.  None of these positions were held as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

·The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have an interest support agreement, YRT premium support agreement, and two portfolio maintenance agreements with PLC. The Company entered into two separate portfolio maintenance agreements in October 2012.

·The Company uses various swaps and other types of derivatives to manage risk related to other exposures.

 

·                  The Company is involved in various modified coinsurance and funds withheld arrangements which contain embedded derivatives. Changes in their fair value are recorded in current period earnings. The investment portfolios that support the related modified coinsurance reserves and funds withheld

55



Table of Contents

arrangements had fair value changes which substantially offset the gains or losses on these embedded derivatives.

64



Table of Contents

 

The following table sets forth realized investments gains and losses for the periods shown:

 

Realized investment gains (losses) - derivative financial instruments

 

 

Successor

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

Company

 

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Derivatives related to variable annuity contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate futures - VA

 

$

1,979

 

$

(2,255

)

$

12,777

 

$

(26,393

)

 

$

(48

)

 

$

1,413

 

$

4,250

 

Equity futures - VA

 

861

 

(12,568

)

(9,049

)

(39,829

)

 

(32,469

)

 

9,221

 

(2,651

)

Currency futures - VA

 

10,185

 

(6,531

)

6,020

 

1,440

 

 

6,137

 

 

7,778

 

(1,278

)

Variance swaps - VA

 

1,570

 

(1,347

)

(1,103

)

(9,566

)

 

 

 

 

(1,850

)

Equity options - VA

 

2,050

 

(29,094

)

(31,240

)

(65,631

)

 

(21,774

)

 

3,047

 

(12,341

)

Interest rate swaptions - VA

 

(2,812

)

1,725

 

(17,213

)

(738

)

 

(11,328

)

 

9,268

 

(9,403

)

Interest rate swaps - VA

 

22,011

 

(19,224

)

124,548

 

(125,502

)

 

(54,791

)

 

122,710

 

57,368

 

Embedded derivative - GMWB

 

(11,407

)

40,379

 

(51,869

)

146,693

 

 

35,870

 

 

(68,503

)

(27,315

)

Funds withheld derivative

 

(2,432

)

32,207

 

27,298

 

42,045

 

 

38,236

 

 

(9,073

)

10,699

 

Total derivatives related to variable annuity contracts

 

22,005

 

3,292

 

60,169

 

(77,481

)

 

(40,167

)

 

75,861

 

17,479

 

Derivatives related to FIA contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative - FIA

 

(2,462

)

(104

)

(9,036

)

(145

)

 

(2,583

)

 

1,769

 

1,733

 

Equity futures - FIA

 

117

 

(42

)

1,067

 

(42

)

 

184

 

 

(184

)

345

 

Volatility futures - FIA

 

(4

)

 

4

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Equity options - FIA

 

1,099

 

104

 

5,077

 

85

 

 

4,375

 

 

(2,617

)

994

 

Total derivatives related to FIA contracts

 

(1,250

)

(42

)

(2,888

)

(102

)

 

1,980

 

 

(1,032

)

3,072

 

Derivatives related to IUL contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative - IUL

 

347

 

 

62

 

 

 

257

 

 

(486

)

 

Equity futures - IUL

 

16

 

 

16

 

 

 

14

 

 

3

 

 

Equity options - IUL

 

(24

)

 

(24

)

 

 

140

 

 

(115

)

 

Total derivatives related to IUL contracts

 

339

 

 

54

 

 

 

411

 

 

(598

)

 

Embedded derivative - Modco reinsurance treaties

 

20,426

 

30,074

 

(91,945

)

191,847

 

 

32,191

 

 

(68,026

)

(60,169

)

Interest rate swaps

 

 

72

 

 

2,984

 

Derivatives with PLC (1)

 

398

 

(1,159

)

536

 

(14,689

)

 

565

 

 

15,863

 

105

 

Other derivatives

 

(149

)

(25

)

(351

)

(149

)

 

72

 

 

(37

)

(61

)

Total realized gains (losses) - derivatives

 

$

41,769

 

$

32,212

 

$

(34,425

)

$

102,410

 

 

$

(4,948

)

 

$

22,031

 

$

(39,574

)

 


(1)These derivatives include the Interest, YRT premium support, and portfolio maintenance agreements between certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and PLC.

56



These derivatives include the Interest, YRT premium support, and portfolio maintenance agreements between certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and PLC.

 

The following table sets forth realized investments gains and losses for the Modco trading portfolio that is included in realized investment gains (losses) — all other investments:

 

Realized investment gains (losses) - all other investments

 

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Modco trading portfolio(1) 

 

$

(17,225

)

$

(25,960

)

$

110,067

 

$

(167,982

)

 

 

Successor

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Company

 

 

Company

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Modco trading portfolio(1)

 

$

(33,160

)

 

$

73,062

 

$

66,303

 

 


(1)The Company elected to include the use of alternate disclosures for trading activities.

65



Table of Contents

 

The following tables presenttable presents the components of the gain or loss on derivatives that qualify as a cash flow hedging relationship:

 

Gain (Loss) on Derivatives in Cash Flow Hedging Relationship

 

 

 

 

Amount and Location of

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amount and Location of

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains (Losses)

 

 

 

 

Amount of Gains (Losses)

 

Gains (Losses)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassified from

 

Amount and Location of

 

 

Deferred in

 

Reclassified from

 

Amount and Location of

 

 

Amount of Gains (Losses)

 

Accumulated Other

 

(Losses) Recognized in

 

 

Accumulated Other

 

Accumulated Other

 

(Losses) Recognized in

 

 

Deferred in

 

Comprehensive Income

 

Income (Loss) on

 

 

Comprehensive Income

 

Comprehensive Income

 

Income (Loss) on

 

 

Accumulated Other

 

(Loss) into Income (Loss)

 

Derivatives

 

 

(Loss) on Derivatives

 

(Loss) into Income (Loss)

 

Derivatives

 

 

Comprehensive Income

 

(Effective Portion)

 

(Ineffective Portion)

 

 

(Effective Portion)

 

(Effective Portion)

 

(Ineffective Portion)

 

 

(Loss) on Derivatives

 

Benefits and settlement

 

Realized investment

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement

 

Realized investment

 

 

(Effective Portion)

 

expenses

 

gains (losses)

 

 

 

 

expenses

 

gains (losses)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Successor Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inflation

 

$

(64

)

$

(293

)

$

(79

)

 

$

(36

)

$

(90

)

$

(4

)

Total

 

$

(64

)

$

(293

)

$

(79

)

 

$

(36

)

$

(90

)

$

(4

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inflation

 

$

(90

)

$

(1,577

)

$

(205

)

Total

 

$

(90

)

$

(1,577

)

$

(205

)

Predecessor Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inflation

 

$

13

 

$

(36

)

$

(7

)

Total

 

$

13

 

$

(36

)

$

(7

)

Predecessor Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2014

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inflation

 

$

903

 

$

(670

)

$

39

 

Total

 

$

903

 

$

(670

)

$

39

 

 

57



Table of Contents

Gain (Loss) on Derivatives in Cash Flow Relationship

 

 

 

 

Amount and Location of

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gains (Losses)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reclassified from

 

Amount and Location of

 

 

 

Amount of Gains (Losses)

 

Accumulated Other

 

(Losses) Recognized in

 

 

 

Deferred in

 

Comprehensive Income

 

Income (Loss) on

 

 

 

Accumulated Other

 

(Loss) into Income (Loss)

 

Derivatives

 

 

 

Comprehensive Income

 

(Effective Portion)

 

(Ineffective Portion)

 

 

 

(Loss) on Derivatives

 

Benefits and settlement

 

Realized investment

 

 

 

(Effective Portion)

 

expenses

 

gains (losses)

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inflation

 

$

22

 

$

(572

)

$

(62

)

Total

 

$

22

 

$

(572

)

$

(62

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inflation

 

$

(157

)

$

(1,649

)

$

(253

)

Total

 

$

(157

)

$

(1,649

)

$

(253

)

5866



Table of Contents

 

The tables below present information about the nature and accounting treatment of the Company’s primary derivative financial instruments and the location in and effect on the consolidated condensed financial statements for the periods presented below:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

As of

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

As of March 31, 2015

 

As of December 31, 2014

 

 

Notional

 

Fair

 

Notional

 

Fair

 

 

Notional

 

Fair

 

 

Notional

 

Fair

 

 

Amount

 

Value

 

Amount

 

Value

 

 

Amount

 

Value

 

 

Amount

 

Value

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Other long-term investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

$

345,000

 

$

6,426

 

$

200,000

 

$

1,961

 

 

$

1,725,000

 

$

99,230

 

 

$

1,550,000

 

$

50,743

 

Derivatives with PLC(1)

 

1,488,570

 

2,529

 

1,464,164

 

1,993

 

Derivatives with PLC(1)

 

1,510,682

 

22,505

 

 

1,497,010

 

6,077

 

Embedded derivative - Modco reinsurance treaties

 

65,241

 

1,381

 

80,376

 

1,517

 

 

65,609

 

1,572

 

 

25,760

 

1,051

 

Embedded derivative - GMWB

 

1,997,299

 

57,364

 

1,921,443

 

95,376

 

 

1,799,940

 

55,145

 

 

1,302,895

 

37,497

 

Interest rate futures

 

410,966

 

4,731

 

 

27,977

 

938

 

Equity futures

 

291,062

 

5,451

 

3,387

 

111

 

 

26,607

 

102

 

 

26,483

 

427

 

Currency futures

 

87,061

 

1,963

 

14,338

 

321

 

 

112,106

 

524

 

 

197,648

 

2,384

 

Equity options

 

2,212,459

 

144,029

 

1,376,205

 

78,277

 

 

2,285,482

 

163,491

 

 

1,921,167

 

163,212

 

Interest rate swaptions

 

625,000

 

13,078

 

625,000

 

30,291

 

 

225,000

 

5,690

 

 

625,000

 

8,012

 

Other

 

592

 

330

 

425

 

473

 

 

849

 

451

 

 

242

 

360

 

 

$

7,112,284

 

$

232,551

 

$

5,685,338

 

$

210,320

 

 

$

8,162,241

 

$

353,441

 

 

$

7,174,182

 

$

270,701

 

Other liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cash flow hedges:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Inflation

 

$

105,786

 

$

433

 

$

182,965

 

$

1,865

 

 

$

19,285

 

$

55

 

 

$

40,469

 

$

142

 

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate swaps

 

1,130,000

 

43,470

 

1,230,000

 

153,322

 

 

250,000

 

1,792

 

 

275,000

 

3,599

 

Variance swaps

 

1,000

 

2,252

 

1,500

 

1,744

 

Embedded derivative - Modco reinsurance treaties

 

2,539,004

 

298,728

 

2,578,590

 

206,918

 

 

2,512,057

 

341,698

 

 

2,562,848

 

311,727

 

Funds withheld derivative

 

1,450,119

 

64,573

 

991,568

 

34,251

 

 

1,477,462

 

71,533

 

 

1,233,424

 

57,305

 

Embedded derivative - GMWB

 

851,295

 

15,351

 

104,180

 

1,496

 

 

1,322,637

 

44,312

 

 

1,702,899

 

63,460

 

Embedded derivative - FIA

 

689,543

 

103,497

 

244,424

 

25,324

 

 

790,225

 

83,126

 

 

749,933

 

124,465

 

Embedded derivative - IUL

 

5,232

 

2,609

 

 

 

 

18,262

 

8,593

 

 

12,019

 

6,691

 

Interest rate futures

 

337,015

 

1,949

 

322,902

 

5,221

 

 

8,140

 

54

 

 

 

 

Equity futures

 

57,615

 

604

 

164,595

 

6,595

 

 

666,286

 

4,547

 

 

385,256

 

15,069

 

Currency futures

 

81,945

 

124

 

118,008

 

840

 

 

122,150

 

1,379

 

 

 

 

Equity options

 

587,303

 

36,811

 

257,065

 

17,558

 

 

960,718

 

38,866

 

 

699,295

 

47,077

 

Other

 

358

 

22

 

230

 

27

 

 

609

 

42

 

 

 

 

 

$

7,836,215

 

$

570,423

 

$

6,196,027

 

$

455,161

 

 

$

8,147,831

 

$

595,997

 

 

$

7,661,143

 

$

629,535

 

 


(1)These derivatives include the Interest, YRT premium support, and portfolio maintenance agreements between certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and PLC.

These derivatives include the Interest, YRT premium support, and portfolio maintenance agreements between certain of the Company’s subsidiaries and PLC.

 

Based on the expected cash flows of the underlying hedged items, the Company expects to reclassify $0.3 millionthe remaining balance of its derivative financial instruments out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) into earnings during the next twelve months.

 

17.16.          OFFSETTING OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

 

Certain of the Company’s derivative instruments are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements that provide for the net settlement of all derivative contracts between the Company and a counterparty in the event of default or upon the occurrence of certain termination events. Collateral support agreements associated with each master netting arrangement provide that the Company will receive or pledge financial collateral in the event either minimum thresholds, or in certain cases ratings levels, have been reached. Additionally, certain of the Company’s repurchase

 

5967



Table of Contents

 

agreements provide for net settlement on termination of the agreement. Refer to Note 9, Debt and Other Obligations for details of the Company’s repurchase agreement programs.

 

The tables below present the derivative instruments by assets and liabilities for the Company as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Amounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Amounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

of Assets

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

of Assets

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts

 

Presented in

 

in the Statement of

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts

 

Presented in

 

in the Statement of

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Offset in the

 

the

 

Financial Position

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Offset in the

 

the

 

Financial Position

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Statement of

 

Statement of

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Statement of

 

Statement of

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

Recognized

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

 

Recognized

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

Position

 

Position

 

Instruments

 

Received

 

Net Amount

 

 

Assets

 

Position

 

Position

 

Instruments

 

Received

 

Net Amount

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Offsetting of Derivative Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-Standing derivatives

 

$

170,970

 

$

 

$

170,970

 

$

58,156

 

$

34,311

 

$

78,503

 

 

$

273,814

 

$

 

$

273,814

 

$

41,440

 

$

120,634

 

$

111,740

 

Total derivatives, subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

273,814

 

 

273,814

 

41,440

 

120,634

 

111,740

 

Derivatives not subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative - Modco reinsurance treaties

 

1,381

 

 

1,381

 

 

 

1,381

 

 

1,572

 

 

1,572

 

 

 

1,572

 

Embedded derivative - GMWB

 

57,364

 

 

57,364

 

 

 

57,364

 

 

55,145

 

 

55,145

 

 

 

55,145

 

Total derivatives, subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

229,715

 

 

229,715

 

58,156

 

34,311

 

137,248

 

Derivatives with PLC

 

22,505

 

 

22,505

 

 

 

22,505

 

Other

 

405

 

 

405

 

 

 

405

 

Total derivatives, not subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

2,836

 

 

2,836

 

 

 

2,836

 

 

79,627

 

 

79,627

 

 

 

79,627

 

Total derivatives

 

232,551

 

 

232,551

 

58,156

 

34,311

 

140,084

 

 

353,441

 

 

353,441

 

41,440

 

120,634

 

191,367

 

Total Assets

 

$

232,551

 

$

 

$

232,551

 

$

58,156

 

$

34,311

 

$

140,084

 

 

$

353,441

 

$

 

$

353,441

 

$

41,440

 

$

120,634

 

$

191,367

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Amounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

of Liabilities

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts

 

Presented in

 

in the Statement of

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Offset in the

 

the

 

Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Statement of

 

Statement of

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

 

Recognized

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

Position

 

Position

 

Instruments

 

Paid

 

Net Amount

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-Standing derivatives

 

$

85,665

 

$

 

$

85,665

 

$

58,156

 

$

25,961

 

$

1,548

 

Embedded derivative - Modco reinsurance treaties

 

298,728

 

 

298,728

 

 

 

298,728

 

Funds withheld derivative

 

64,573

 

 

64,573

 

 

 

64,573

 

Embedded derivative - GMWB

 

15,351

 

 

15,351

 

 

 

15,351

 

Embedded derivative - FIA

 

103,497

 

 

103,497

 

 

 

103,497

 

Embedded derivative - IUL

 

2,609

 

 

2,609

 

 

 

2,609

 

Total derivatives, subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

570,423

 

 

570,423

 

58,156

 

25,961

 

486,306

 

Total derivatives, not subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total derivatives

 

570,423

 

 

570,423

 

58,156

 

25,961

 

486,306

 

Repurchase agreements(1)

 

359,804

 

 

359,804

 

 

 

359,804

 

Total Liabilities

 

$

930,227

 

$

 

$

930,227

 

$

58,156

 

$

25,961

 

$

846,110

 

68



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Amounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

of Assets

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts

 

Presented in

 

in the Statement of

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Offset in the

 

the

 

Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Statement of

 

Statement of

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

 

Recognized

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

Position

 

Position

 

Instruments

 

Paid

 

Net Amount

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-Standing derivatives

 

$

46,735

 

$

 

$

46,735

 

$

41,440

 

$

5,295

 

$

 

Total derivatives, subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

46,735

 

 

46,735

 

41,440

 

5,295

 

 

Derivatives, not subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative - Modco reinsurance treaties

 

341,698

 

 

341,698

 

 

 

341,698

 

Funds withheld derivative

 

71,533

 

 

71,533

 

 

 

 

 

71,533

 

Embedded derivative - GMWB

 

44,312

 

 

44,312

 

 

 

44,312

 

Embedded derivative - FIA

 

83,126

 

 

83,126

 

 

 

83,126

 

Embedded derivative - IUL

 

8,593

 

 

8,593

 

 

 

8,593

 

Total derivatives, not subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

549,262

 

 

549,262

 

 

 

549,262

 

Total derivatives

 

595,997

 

 

595,997

 

41,440

 

5,295

 

549,262

 

Repurchase agreements(1)

 

510,123

 

 

510,123

 

 

 

510,123

 

Total Liabilities

 

$

1,106,120

 

$

 

$

1,106,120

 

$

41,440

 

$

5,295

 

$

1,059,385

 

 


(1) Borrowings under repurchase agreements are for a term less than 90 days.

 

6069



Table of Contents

 

The tables below present the derivative instruments by assets and liabilities for the Company as of December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company):

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Amounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Amounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

of Assets

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

of Assets

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts

 

Presented in

 

in the Statement of

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts

 

Presented in

 

in the Statement of

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Offset in the

 

the

 

Financial Position

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Offset in the

 

the

 

Financial Position

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Statement of

 

Statement of

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Statement of

 

Statement of

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

Recognized

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

 

Recognized

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

 

Assets

 

Position

 

Position

 

Instruments

 

Received

 

Net Amount

 

 

Assets

 

Position

 

Position

 

Instruments

 

Received

 

Net Amount

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Offsetting of Derivative Assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-Standing derivatives

 

$

110,983

 

$

 

$

110,983

 

$

52,487

 

$

10,700

 

$

47,796

 

 

$

225,716

 

$

 

$

225,716

 

$

53,612

 

$

73,935

 

$

98,169

 

Total derivatives, subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

225,716

 

 

225,716

 

53,612

 

73,935

 

98,169

 

Derivatives not subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative - Modco reinsurance treaties

 

1,517

 

 

1,517

 

 

 

1,517

 

 

1,051

 

 

1,051

 

 

 

1,051

 

Embedded derivative - GMWB

 

95,376

 

 

95,376

 

 

 

95,376

 

 

37,497

 

 

37,497

 

 

 

37,497

 

Total derivatives, subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

207,876

 

 

207,876

 

52,487

 

10,700

 

144,689

 

Derivatives with PLC

 

6,077

 

 

6,077

 

 

 

6,077

 

Other

 

360

 

 

360

 

 

 

360

 

Total derivatives, not subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

2,444

 

 

2,444

 

 

 

2,444

 

 

44,985

 

 

44,985

 

 

 

44,985

 

Total derivatives

 

210,320

 

 

210,320

 

52,487

 

10,700

 

147,133

 

 

270,701

 

 

270,701

 

53,612

 

73,935

 

143,154

 

Total Assets

 

$

210,320

 

$

 

$

210,320

 

$

52,487

 

$

10,700

 

$

147,133

 

 

$

270,701

 

$

 

$

270,701

 

$

53,612

 

$

73,935

 

$

143,154

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Amounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

of Liabilities

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts

 

Presented in

 

in the Statement of

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Offset in the

 

the

 

Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Statement of

 

Statement of

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

 

Recognized

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

Position

 

Position

 

Instruments

 

Paid

 

Net Amount

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-Standing derivatives

 

$

187,172

 

$

 

$

187,172

 

$

52,487

 

$

98,359

 

$

36,326

 

Embedded derivative - Modco reinsurance treaties

 

206,918

 

 

206,918

 

 

 

206,918

 

Funds withheld derivative

 

34,251

 

 

34,251

 

 

 

34,251

 

Embedded derivative - GMWB

 

1,496

 

 

1,496

 

 

 

1,496

 

Embedded derivative - FIA

 

25,324

 

 

25,324

 

 

 

25,324

 

Total derivatives, subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

455,161

 

 

455,161

 

52,487

 

98,359

 

304,315

 

Total derivatives, not subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total derivatives

 

455,161

 

 

455,161

 

52,487

 

98,359

 

304,315

 

Repurchase agreements(1)

 

350,000

 

 

350,000

 

 

 

350,000

 

Total Liabilities

 

$

805,161

 

$

 

$

805,161

 

$

52,487

 

$

98,359

 

$

654,315

 

70



Table of Contents

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net Amounts

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

of Assets

 

Gross Amounts Not Offset

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts

 

Presented in

 

in the Statement of

 

 

 

 

 

Gross

 

Offset in the

 

the

 

Financial Position

 

 

 

 

 

Amounts of

 

Statement of

 

Statement of

 

 

 

Cash

 

 

 

 

 

Recognized

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Financial

 

Collateral

 

 

 

 

 

Liabilities

 

Position

 

Position

 

Instruments

 

Paid

 

Net Amount

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Offsetting of Derivative Liabilities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Free-Standing derivatives

 

$

65,887

 

$

 

$

65,887

 

$

53,612

 

$

12,258

 

$

17

 

Total derivatives, subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

65,887

 

 

65,887

 

53,612

 

12,258

 

17

 

Derivatives not subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Funds witheld derivative

 

311,727

 

 

311,727

 

 

 

311,727

 

Embedded derivative - Modco reinsurance treaties

 

57,305

 

 

57,305

 

 

 

57,305

 

Embedded derivative - GMWB

 

63,460

 

 

63,460

 

 

 

63,460

 

Embedded derivative - FIA

 

124,465

 

 

124,465

 

 

 

124,465

 

Embedded derivative - IUL

 

6,691

 

 

6,691

 

 

 

6,691

 

Total derivatives, not subject to a master netting arrangement or similar arrangement

 

563,648

 

 

563,648

 

 

 

563,648

 

Total derivatives

 

629,535

 

 

629,535

 

53,612

 

12,258

 

563,665

 

Repurchase agreements(1)

 

50,000

 

 

50,000

 

 

 

50,000

 

Total Liabilities

 

$

679,535

 

$

 

$

679,535

 

$

53,612

 

$

12,258

 

$

613,665

 

 


(1) Borrowings under repurchase agreements are for a term less than 90 days.

61



Table of Contents

 

18.17.          OPERATING SEGMENTS

 

The Company has several operating segments each having a strategic focus. An operating segment is distinguished by products, channels of distribution, and/or other strategic distinctions. The Company periodically evaluates its operating segments, as prescribed in the ASC Segment Reporting Topic, and makes adjustments to its segment reporting as needed. There were no changes to the Company’s operating segments made or required to be made as a result of the Merger on February 1, 2015. A brief description of each segment follows.

 

·                  The Life Marketing segment markets fixed universal life (“UL”), indexed universal life, variable universal life (“VUL”), bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”), and level premium term insurance (“traditional”) products on a national basis primarily through networks of independent insurance agents and brokers, broker-dealers, financial institutions, and independent marketing organizations.

 

·                  The Acquisitions segment focuses on acquiring, converting, and servicing policies acquired from other companies. The segment’s primary focus is on life insurance policies and annuity products that were sold to individuals. The level of the segment’s acquisition activity is predicated upon many factors, including available capital, operating capacity, potential return on capital, and market dynamics. Policies acquired through the Acquisitions segment are typically blocks of business where no new policies are being marketed. Therefore earnings and account values are expected to decline as the result of lapses, deaths, and other terminations of coverage unless new acquisitions are made.

 

·                  The Annuities segment markets fixed and variable annuityVA products. These products are primarily sold through broker-dealers, financial institutions, and independent agents and brokers.

 

·                  The Stable Value Products segment sells fixed and floating rate funding agreements directly to the trustees of municipal bond proceeds, money market funds, bank trust departments, and other institutional

71



Table of Contents

investors. The segment also issues funding agreements to the FHLB, and markets guaranteed investment contracts (“GICs”) to 401(k) and other qualified retirement savings plans.  Additionally, the Company has contracts outstanding pursuant to a funding agreement-backed notes program registered with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) which offered notes to both institutional and retail investors.

 

·                  The Asset Protection segment markets extended service contracts and credit life and disability insurance to protect consumers’ investments in automobiles and recreational vehicles. In addition, the segment markets a guaranteed asset protection (“GAP”) product. GAP coverage covers the difference between the loan pay-off amount and an asset’s actual cash value in the case of a total loss.

 

·                  The Corporate and Other segment primarily consists of net investment income not assigned to the segments above (including the impact of carrying liquidity) and expenses not attributable to the segments above. This segment includes earnings from several non-strategic or runoff lines of business, various investment-related transactions, the operations of several small subsidiaries, and the repurchase of non-recourse funding obligations.

 

The Company uses the same accounting policies and procedures to measure segment operating income (loss) and assets as it uses to measure consolidated net income and assets. Segment operating income (loss) is income before income tax, excluding realized gains and losses on investments and derivatives net of the amortization related to deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”), value of business acquired (“VOBA”), and benefits and settlement expenses. Operating earnings exclude changes in the GMWB embedded derivatives (excluding the portion attributed to economic cost), realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used to hedge the VA product, actual GMWB incurred claims and the related amortization of DAC attributed to each of these items.

 

Segment operating income (loss) represents the basis on which the performance of the Company’s business is internally assessed by management. Premiums and policy fees, other income, benefits and settlement expenses, and amortization of DAC/VOBA are attributed directly to each operating segment. Net investment income is allocated based on directly related assets required for transacting the business of that segment. Realized investment gains (losses) and other operating expenses are allocated to the segments in a manner that most appropriately reflects the operations of

62



Table of Contents

that segment. Investments and other assets are allocated based on statutory policy liabilities net of associated statutory policy assets, while DAC/VOBA and goodwill are shown in the segments to which they are attributable. The goodwill as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) was the result of the Dai-ichi Merger. The purchase price was allocated to the segments in proportion to the segment’s respective fair value. The allocated purchase price in excess of the fair value of assets and liabilities of each segment resulted in the establishment of that segment’s goodwill as of the date of the Merger.

 

There were no significant intersegment transactions during the three or nine months ended September 30, 2014period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) and 2013.

The following tables summarize financial information for the Company’s segments:

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Life Marketing

 

$

368,479

 

$

346,294

 

$

1,098,015

 

$

1,002,522

 

Acquisitions

 

408,522

 

240,067

 

1,273,714

 

752,247

 

Annuities

 

200,366

 

170,065

 

582,645

 

435,480

 

Stable Value Products

 

38,719

 

25,207

 

93,696

 

91,735

 

Asset Protection

 

77,277

 

76,157

 

227,244

 

223,709

 

Corporate and Other

 

23,397

 

22,804

 

69,981

 

76,525

 

Total revenues

 

$

1,116,760

 

$

880,594

 

$

3,345,295

 

$

2,582,218

 

Segment Operating Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Life Marketing

 

$

31,571

 

$

28,158

 

$

79,471

 

$

75,505

 

Acquisitions

 

72,929

 

29,429

 

198,807

 

93,241

 

Annuities

 

42,659

 

43,825

 

136,590

 

120,260

 

Stable Value Products

 

19,506

 

19,206

 

54,190

 

59,514

 

Asset Protection

 

6,962

 

5,365

 

18,535

 

15,347

 

Corporate and Other

 

(25,986

)

(17,856

)

(76,363

)

(45,793

)

Total segment operating income

 

147,641

 

108,127

 

411,230

 

318,074

 

Realized investment (losses) gains - investments(1)

 

(11,903

)

(31,968

)

112,769

 

(140,299

)

Realized investment (losses) gains - derivatives

 

48,382

 

37,196

 

(15,653

)

124,321

 

Income tax expense

 

(62,287

)

(37,107

)

(167,921

)

(98,966

)

Net income

 

$

121,833

 

$

76,248

 

$

340,425

 

$

203,130

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment gains (losses)(2)

 

$

(2,470

)

$

(27,949

)

$

147,091

 

$

(151,006

)

Less: amortization related to DAC/VOBA and benefits and settlement expenses

 

9,433

 

4,019

 

34,322

 

(10,707

)

Realized investment gains (losses) in investments

 

$

(11,903

)

$

(31,968

)

$

112,769

 

$

(140,299

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative gains (losses)(3)

 

$

41,769

 

$

32,212

 

$

(34,425

)

$

102,410

 

Less: VA GMWB economic cost

 

(6,613

)

(4,984

)

(18,772

)

(21,911

)

Realized investment gains (losses) - derivatives

 

$

48,382

 

$

37,196

 

$

(15,653

)

$

124,321

 


(1) Includes credit related other-than-temporary impairments of $2.3 million and $5.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2014 respectively, as compared to $8.7 million and $17.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.

(2) Includes realized investment gains (losses) before related amortization.

(3)Includes realized gains (losses) on derivatives before the VA GMWB economic cost.(Predecessor Company).

 

6372



Table of Contents

 

The following tables summarize financial information for the Company’s segments (Predecessor and Successor periods are not comparable):

 

 

Operating Segment Assets

 

 

 

As of September 30, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

Life

 

 

 

 

 

Stable Value

 

 

 

Marketing

 

Acquisitions

 

Annuities

 

Products

 

Investments and other assets

 

$

13,699,580

 

$

19,895,241

 

$

20,599,817

 

$

2,260,840

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

1,950,507

 

635,336

 

519,441

 

706

 

Goodwill

 

 

30,193

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

15,650,087

 

$

20,560,770

 

$

21,119,258

 

$

2,261,546

 

 

 

 

Asset

 

Corporate

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Protection

 

and Other

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated

 

Investments and other assets

 

$

825,404

 

$

9,560,639

 

$

15,428

 

$

66,856,949

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

42,313

 

402

 

 

3,148,705

 

Goodwill

 

48,158

 

 

 

78,351

 

Total assets

 

$

915,875

 

$

9,561,041

 

$

15,428

 

$

70,084,005

 

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Revenues

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Life Marketing

 

$

254,922

 

 

$

133,361

 

$

352,823

 

Acquisitions

 

258,789

 

 

139,761

 

426,948

 

Annuities

 

49,344

 

 

130,918

 

191,975

 

Stable Value Products

 

10,342

 

 

8,181

 

27,851

 

Asset Protection

 

49,296

 

 

24,566

 

72,846

 

Corporate and Other

 

18,268

 

 

22,859

 

16,906

 

Total revenues

 

$

640,961

 

 

$

459,646

 

$

1,089,349

 

Segment Operating Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Life Marketing

 

$

4,281

 

 

$

(2,271

)

$

22,497

 

Acquisitions

 

36,070

 

 

20,134

 

60,996

 

Annuities

 

31,373

 

 

11,363

 

45,328

 

Stable Value Products

 

6,115

 

 

4,529

 

17,397

 

Asset Protection

 

3,643

 

 

1,907

 

4,809

 

Corporate and Other

 

(13,957

)

 

(16,662

)

(23,681

)

Total segment operating income

 

67,525

 

 

19,000

 

127,346

 

Realized investment (losses) gains - investments (1)

 

(42,933

)

 

89,414

 

57,930

 

Realized investment (losses) gains - derivatives

 

(56

)

 

24,433

 

(33,665

)

Income tax expense

 

(8,116

)

 

(44,325

)

(49,062

)

Net income

 

$

16,420

 

 

$

88,522

 

$

102,549

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(2)Investment gains (losses)

 

$

(35,056

)

 

$

80,672

 

$

70,555

 

Less: amortization related to DAC/VOBA and benefits and settlement expenses

 

7,877

 

 

(8,742

)

12,625

 

Realized investment gains (losses) - investments

 

$

(42,933

)

 

$

89,414

 

$

57,930

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(3)Derivative gains (losses)

 

$

(4,948

)

 

$

22,031

 

$

(39,574

)

Less: VA GMWB economic cost

 

(4,892

)

 

(2,402

)

(5,909

)

Realized investment gains (losses) - derivatives

 

$

(56

)

 

$

24,433

 

$

(33,665

)

 

 

 

Operating Segment Assets

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2013

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

Life

 

 

 

 

 

Stable Value

 

 

 

Marketing

 

Acquisitions

 

Annuities

 

Products

 

Investments and other assets

 

$

13,135,914

 

$

20,188,321

 

$

20,029,310

 

$

2,558,551

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

2,071,470

 

799,255

 

554,974

 

1,001

 

Goodwill

 

 

32,517

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

15,207,384

 

$

21,020,093

 

$

20,584,284

 

$

2,559,552

 


(1) Includes credit related other-than-temporary impairments of $0.5 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) and $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), respectively. The Company did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairments for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

(2)Includes realized investment gains (losses) before related amortization.

(3)Includes realized gains (losses) on derivatives before the VA GMWB economic cost.

 

 

 

Asset

 

Corporate

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Protection

 

and Other

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated

 

Investments and other assets

 

$

777,388

 

$

8,006,256

 

$

16,762

 

$

64,712,502

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

49,275

 

646

 

 

3,476,621

 

Goodwill

 

48,158

 

 

 

80,675

 

Total assets

 

$

874,821

 

$

8,006,902

 

$

16,762

 

$

68,269,798

 

73



Table of Contents

 

 

Operating Segment Assets

 

 

 

As of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

Life

 

 

 

 

 

Stable Value

 

 

 

Marketing

 

Acquisitions

 

Annuities

 

Products

 

Investments and other assets

 

$

13,568,112

 

$

20,526,268

 

$

20,319,419

 

$

1,799,982

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

991,539

 

(183,586

)

462,339

 

 

Other intangibles

 

333,841

 

41,574

 

206,778

 

9,889

 

Goodwill

 

203,543

 

14,524

 

336,677

 

113,813

 

Total assets

 

$

15,097,035

 

$

20,398,780

 

$

21,325,213

 

$

1,923,684

 

 

 

Asset

 

Corporate

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Protection

 

and Other

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated

 

Investments and other assets

 

$

733,873

 

$

11,063,000

 

$

11,320

 

$

68,021,974

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

46,054

 

 

 

1,316,346

 

Other intangibles

 

84,032

 

 

 

 

 

676,114

 

Goodwill

 

67,155

 

 

 

735,712

 

Total assets

 

$

931,114

 

$

11,063,000

 

$

11,320

 

$

70,750,146

 

 

 

 

Operating Segment Assets

 

 

 

As of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

Life

 

 

 

 

 

Stable Value

 

 

 

Marketing

 

Acquisitions

 

Annuities

 

Products

 

Investments and other assets

 

$

13,858,491

 

$

19,858,284

 

$

20,678,948

 

$

1,958,867

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

1,973,156

 

600,482

 

539,965

 

621

 

Goodwill

 

 

29,419

 

 

 

Total assets

 

$

15,831,647

 

$

20,488,185

 

$

21,218,913

 

$

1,959,488

 

 

 

Asset

 

Corporate

 

 

 

Total

 

 

 

Protection

 

and Other

 

Adjustments

 

Consolidated

 

Investments and other assets

 

$

832,887

 

$

9,557,226

 

$

14,792

 

$

66,759,495

 

Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

40,503

 

319

 

 

3,155,046

 

Goodwill

 

48,158

 

 

 

77,577

 

Total assets

 

$

921,548

 

$

9,557,545

 

$

14,792

 

$

69,992,118

 

 

19.18.          SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

 

The Company has evaluated the effects of events subsequent to September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), and through the date we filed our consolidated condensed financial statements with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission. All accounting and disclosure requirements related to subsequent events are included in the Company’sour consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

PLC held a Special Meeting of Shareholders on October 6, 2014. At the meeting, PLC’s shareowners voted upon and approved a proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement.

6474



Table of Contents

 

Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) should be read in conjunction with our consolidated condensed financial statements included under Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements (Unaudited), of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

For a more complete understanding of our business and current period results, please read the following MD&A in conjunction with our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K and other filings with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”).

 

Certain reclassifications have been made in the previously reported financial statements and accompanying notes to make the prior period amounts comparable to those of the current period. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income or shareowner’s equity.

 

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS — CAUTIONARY LANGUAGE

 

This report reviews our financial condition and results of operations, including our liquidity and capital resources. Historical information is presented and discussed, and where appropriate, factors that may affect future financial performance are also identified and discussed. Certain statements made in this report include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements include any statement that may predict, forecast, indicate, or imply future results, performance, or achievements instead of historical facts and may contain words like “believe,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “budget,” “forecast,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “will,” “shall,” “may,” and other words, phrases, or expressions with similar meaning. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially from the results contained in the forward-looking statements, and we cannot give assurances that such statements will prove to be correct. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results. We undertake no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise. For more information about the risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could affect our future results, please refer to Part I, Item 2, Management’s DiscussionRisks and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Risks and Uncertainties and Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors and Cautionary Factors that may Affect Future Results, of this report, as well as Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors and Cautionary Factors that may Affect Future Results, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company).

IMPORTANT INVESTOR INFORMATION

We file reports with the SEC, including Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and other reports as required. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. We are an electronic filer and the SEC maintains an internet site at www.sec.gov that contains these reports and other information filed electronically by us. We make available through our website, www.protective.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports as soon as reasonably practicable after such materials are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC. We will furnish such documents to anyone who requests such copies in writing. Requests for copies should be directed to: Financial Information, Protective Life Corporation, P. O. Box 2606, Birmingham, Alabama 35202, Telephone (205) 268-3912, Fax (205) 268-3642.

We also make available to the public current information, including financial information, regarding the Company and our affiliates on the Financial Information page of our website, www.protective.com. We encourage investors, the media and others interested in us and our affiliates to review the information we post on our website. The information found on our website is not part of this or any other report filed with or furnished to the SEC.

75



Table of Contents

 

OVERVIEW

 

Our business

 

We are a wholly owned subsidiary of Protective Life Corporation (“PLC”), an insurance holding company whose common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “PL”. Founded in 1907, we are the largest operating subsidiary of PLC. On February 1, 2015, PLC became a wholly owned subsidiary of The Dai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Limited, a kabushiki kaisha organized under the laws of Japan (“Dai-ichi Life”), when DL Investment (Delaware), Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Dai-ichi Life, merged with and into the Company. Prior to February 1, 2015, PLC’s stock was publicly traded on the New York Stock Exchange. Subsequent to the Merger, PLC and the Company remains an SEC registrant for financial reporting purposes in the United States. We provide financial services through the production, distribution, and administration of insurance and investment products. Unless the context otherwise requires, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refers to the consolidated group of Protective Life Insurance Company and our subsidiaries.

 

We have several operating segments, each having a strategic focus. An operating segment is distinguished by products, channels of distribution, and/or other strategic distinctions. We periodically evaluate our operating segments as prescribed in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Segment Reporting Topic, and make adjustments to our segment reporting as needed. There were no changes to our operating segments made or required to be made as a result of the Merger on February 1, 2015.

 

Our operating segments are Life Marketing, Acquisitions, Annuities, Stable Value Products, Asset Protection, and Corporate and Other.

 

·                  Life Marketing - We market fixed universal life (“UL”), indexed universal life (“IUL”), variable universal life (“VUL”), bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”), and level premium term insurance (“traditional”) products on a national basis

65



Table of Contents

primarily through networks of independent insurance agents and brokers, broker-dealers, financial institutions, and independent marketing organizations.

 

·                  Acquisitions - We focus on acquiring, converting, and servicing policies acquired from other companies. TheThis segment’s primary focus is on life insurance policies and annuity products that were sold to individuals. The level of the segment’s acquisition activity is predicated upon many factors, including available capital, operating capacity, potential return on capital, and market dynamics. Policies acquired through the Acquisitions segment are typically blocks of business where no new policies are being marketed. Therefore earnings and account values are expected to decline as the result of lapses, deaths, and other terminations of coverage unless new acquisitions are made.

 

·                  Annuities - We market fixed and variable annuity (“VA”) products. These products are primarily sold through broker-dealers, financial institutions, and independent agents and brokers.

 

·                  Stable Value Products - We sell fixed and floating rate funding agreements directly to the trustees of municipal bond proceeds, money market funds, bank trust departments, and other institutional investors. The segment also issues funding agreements to the Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”), and markets guaranteed investment contracts (“GICs”) to 401(k) and other qualified retirement savings plans. Additionally, we have contracts outstanding pursuant to a funding agreement-backed notes program registered with the SECUnited States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) which offered notes to both institutional and retail investors.

 

·                  Asset Protection - We market extended service contracts and credit life and disability insurance to protect consumers’ investments in automobiles and recreational vehicles. In addition, the segment markets a guaranteed asset protection (“GAP”) product. GAP coverage covers the difference between the loan pay-off amount and an asset’s actual cash value in the case of a total loss.

 

·                  Corporate and Other - This segment primarily consists of net investment income not assigned to the segments above (including the impact of carrying liquidity) and expenses not attributable to the segments above. This segment includes earnings from several non-strategic or runoff lines of business, various

76



Table of Contents

investment-related transactions, the operations of several small subsidiaries, and the repurchase of non-recourse funding obligations.

 

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS — PROPOSED DAI-ICHI MERGER

As described in Note 5, Proposed Dai-ichi Merger, to the consolidated condensed financial statements, on June 3, 2014, PLC entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with The Dai-ichi Life Insurance Company, Limited, a kabushiki kaisha organized under the laws of Japan (“Dai-ichi”) and DL Investment (Delaware), Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Dai-ichi, providing for the merger of DL Investment (Delaware), Inc. with and into PLC (the “Merger”), with PLC surviving the Merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Dai-ichi. If the proposed Merger is completed, at the effective time of the Merger (the “Effective Time”), each share of our common stock, par value $0.50 per share, issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time, other than certain excluded shares, will be converted into the right to receive $70 in cash, without interest (the “Per Share Merger Consideration”). Shares of common stock held by Dai-ichi or PLC or their respective direct or indirect wholly owned subsidiaries will not be entitled to receive the Merger Consideration.

Completion of the Merger is subject to various closing conditions, including, but not limited to, (1) adoption of the Merger Agreement by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least a majority of all outstanding shares of common stock, which adoption was approved at a Special Meeting of Shareholders held on October 6, 2014, (2) requisite approval of the Japan Financial Services Agency of an application and notification filing by Dai-ichi and its affiliates, (3) the receipt of certain insurance regulatory approvals, (4) the absence of any laws that have been adopted or promulgated, or any order, injunction, decision or decree issued or remaining in effect, that would prohibit the Merger or make the Merger illegal, and (5) the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, which waiting period terminated on July 25, 2014, pursuant to a grant of early termination by the Federal Trade Commission. Each party’s obligation to consummate

66



Table of Contents

the Merger also is subject to certain additional conditions that include the accuracy of the other party’s representations and warranties contained in the Merger Agreement (subject to certain materiality qualifiers) and the other party’s compliance with its covenants and agreements contained in the Merger Agreement in all material respects. The Merger Agreement does not contain a financing condition.  Subject to certain limitations, either party may terminate the Merger Agreement if the Merger is not consummated by February 28, 2015, which date is extended until April 30, 2015 in the event of delays in obtaining regulatory approval.

For additional information regarding the Merger and related matters, including the treatment of benefit plans, please refer to PLC’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 4, 2014 and September 25, 2014, PLC’s definitive proxy statement filed with the SEC on August 25, 2014, as amended on August 27, 2014, and Note 5, Proposed Dai-ichi Merger, to the consolidated condensed financial statements included in this report.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

 

The factors which could affect our future results include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions and the following risks and uncertainties:

 

Risks Related to the Proposed Dai-ichi Merger and our Status as an Indirect Subsidiary of Dai-ichi Life

 

·                  uncertainty following the Merger is subject to various closing conditions, including regulatory and third party approvals;

·failure to timely complete the Merger could adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations;

·the pendency of the Merger and operating restrictions contained in the Merger Agreement could adversely affect our business and operations;

·                  shareowner litigation against PLC, PLC’s directors and/or Dai-ichi could delay or prevent the Merger; and

·PLC’s debt ratings and the financial strength ratings of PLC and its insurance subsidiaries, including the Company, may be adversely affected by the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement;it being a subsidiary of Dai-ichi Life;

 

General

 

·                  exposure to the risks of natural and man-made disasters and catastrophes, diseases, epidemics, pandemics, malicious acts, terrorist acts and climate change which could adversely affect our operations and results;

·                  a disruption affecting the electronic systems of the Company or those on whom the Company relies could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations;

·                  confidential information maintained in ourthe systems of the Company or other parities upon which the Company relies could be compromised or misappropriated, damaging our business and reputation and adversely affecting our financial condition and results of operations;

·                  our results and financial condition may be negatively affected should actual experience differ from management’s assumptions and estimates;

·                  we may not realize our anticipated financial results from our acquisitions strategy;

·we may not be able to achieve the expected results from our recent acquisition;

·                  assets allocated to the MONY Closed Block benefit only the holders of certain policies; adverse performance of Closed Block assets or adverse experience of Closed Block liabilities may negatively affect us;

·                  we are dependent on the performance of others;

·                  our risk management policies, practices, and procedures could leave us exposed to unidentified or unanticipated risks, which could negatively affect our business or result in losses;

·                  our strategies for mitigating risks arising from our day-to-day operations may prove ineffective resulting in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition;

67



Table of Contents

 

Financial environment

 

·                  interest rate fluctuations and sustained periods of low interest rates could negatively affect our interest earnings and spread income, or otherwise impact our business;

·                  our investments are subject to market and credit risks, which could be heightened during periods of extreme volatility or disruption in financial and credit markets;

·                  equity market volatility could negatively impact our business;

·                  our use of derivative financial instruments within our risk management strategy may not be effective or sufficient;

·                  credit market volatility or disruption could adversely impact our financial condition or results from operations;

·                  our ability to grow depends in large part upon the continued availability of capital;

·                  we could be adversely affected by a ratings downgrade or other negative action by a ratings organization;

·                  we could be forced to sell investments at a loss to cover policyholder withdrawals;

·                  disruption of the capital and credit markets could negatively affect our ability to meet our liquidity and financing needs;

·                  difficult general economic conditions could materially adversely affect our business and results of operations;

77



Table of Contents

·                  we may be required to establish a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets, which could materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, and capital position;

·                  we could be adversely affected by an inability to access our credit facility;

·                  we could be adversely affected by an inability to access FHLB lending;

·                  our financial condition or results of operations could be adversely impacted if our assumptions regarding the fair value and future performance of our investments differ from actual experience;

·                  adverse actions of certain funds or their advisers could have a detrimental impact on our ability to sell our variable life and annuity products, or maintain current levels of assets in those products;

·the amount of statutory capital that we have and the amount of statutory capital that we must hold to maintain our financial strength and credit ratings and meet other requirements can vary significantly from time to time and is sensitive to a number of factors outside of our control;

 

Industry

 

·                  we are highly regulated and are subject to routine audits, examinations and actions by regulators, law enforcement agencies, and self-regulatory organizations;

·                  changes to tax law or interpretations of existing tax law could adversely affect our ability to compete with non-insurance products or reduce the demand for certain insurance products;

·                  financial services companies are frequently the targets of legal proceedings, including class action litigation, which could result in substantial judgments;

·                  companies in the financial services industry in particularand insurance industries are sometimes the target of law enforcement investigations and the focus of increased regulatory scrutiny;

·                  new accounting rules, changes to existing accounting rules, or the grant of permitted accounting practices to competitors could negatively impact us;

·                  use of reinsurance introduces variability in our statements of income;

·                  our reinsurers could fail to meet assumed obligations, increase rates, terminate agreements, or be subject to adverse developments that could affect us;

·                  our policy claims fluctuate from period to period resulting in earnings volatility;

 

Competition

 

·                  we operate in a mature, highly competitive industry, which could limit our ability to gain or maintain our position in the industry and negatively affect profitability;

·                  our ability to maintain competitive unit costs is dependent upon the level of new sales and persistency of existing business; and

·                  we may not be able to protect our intellectual property and may be subject to infringement claims.

 

For more information about the risks, uncertainties, and other factors that could affect our future results, please see Part II, Item 1A of this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

68



Table of Contents

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Our accounting policies require the use of judgments relating to a variety of assumptions and estimates, including, but not limited to expectations of current and future mortality, morbidity, persistency, expenses, and interest rates, as well as expectations around the valuations of securities. Because of the inherent uncertainty when using the assumptions and estimates, the effect of certain accounting policies under different conditions or assumptions could be materially different from those reported in the consolidated condensed financial statements. For a complete listing of our critical accounting policies, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company). Certain of our accounting policies were amended in conjunction with the Dai-ichi Merger. Please refer to Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, included in this Form 10-Q for more information.

 

Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs78



Based on the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC” or “Codification”) Financial Services — Insurance Topic, we make certain assumptions regarding the mortality, persistency, expenses, and interest rates we expect to experience in future periods. These assumptions are to be best estimates and are periodically updated whenever actual experience and/or expectations for the future change from that assumed. Additionally, using guidance from ASC Investments-Debt and Equity Securities Topic, these costs have been adjusted by an amount equal to the amortization that would have been recorded if unrealized gains or losses on investments associated with our universal life an investment products had been realized. Acquisition costs for stable value contracts are amortized over the termTable of the contracts using the effective yield method.Contents

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

We use the same accounting policies and procedures to measure segment operating income (loss) and assets as we use to measure consolidated net income and assets. Segment operating income (loss) is income before income tax, excluding realized gains and losses on investments and derivatives, net of the amortization related to deferred acquisition costs (“DAC”), value of business acquired (“VOBA”), and benefits and settlement expenses. Operating earnings excludeSegment operating income (loss) also excludes changes in the guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits (“GMWB”) embedded derivatives (excluding the portion attributed to economic cost), realized and unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives used to hedge the variable annuity (“VA”) product, actual GMWB incurred claims and the related amortization of DAC attributed to each of these items.

 

Segment operating income (loss) represents the basis on which the performance of our business is internally assessed by management. Premiums and policy fees, other income, benefits and settlement expenses, and amortization of DAC/VOBA are attributed directly to each operating segment. Net investment income is allocated based on directly related assets required for transacting the business of that segment. Realized investment gains (losses) and other operating expenses are allocated to the segments in a manner that most appropriately reflects the operations of that segment. Investments and other assets are allocated based on statutory policy liabilities net of associated statutory policy assets, while DAC/VOBA and goodwill are shown in the segments to which they are attributable.

 

However, segment operating income (loss) should not be viewed as a substitute for net income calculated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) net income.. In addition, our segment operating income (loss) measures may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

 

We periodically review and update as appropriate our key assumptions on products using the ASC Financial Services-Insurance Topic, including future mortality, expenses, lapses, premium persistency, benefit utilization, investment yields, interest spreads, and equity market returns. Changes to these assumptions result in adjustments which increase or decrease DACDAC/VOBA amortization and/or benefits and expenses. The periodic review and updating of assumptions is referred to as “unlocking”. When referring to DACDAC/VOBA amortization or unlocking on products covered under the ASC Financial Services-Insurance Topic, the reference is to changes in all balance sheet components amortized over estimated gross profits.

 

6979



Table of Contents

 

The following table presents a summary of results and reconciles segment operating income (loss) to consolidated net income:income (Predecessor and Successor periods are not comparable):

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Segment Operating Income (Loss)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Life Marketing

 

$

31,571

 

$

28,158

 

12.1

%

$

79,471

 

$

75,505

 

5.3

%

 

$

4,281

 

 

$

(2,271

)

$

22,497

 

Acquisitions

 

72,929

 

29,429

 

n/m

 

198,807

 

93,241

 

n/m

 

 

36,070

 

 

20,134

 

60,996

 

Annuities

 

42,659

 

43,825

 

(2.7

)

136,590

 

120,260

 

13.6

 

 

31,373

 

 

11,363

 

45,328

 

Stable Value Products

 

19,506

 

19,206

 

1.6

 

54,190

 

59,514

 

(8.9

)

 

6,115

 

 

4,529

 

17,397

 

Asset Protection

 

6,962

 

5,365

 

29.8

 

18,535

 

15,347

 

20.8

 

 

3,643

 

 

1,907

 

4,809

 

Corporate and Other

 

(25,986

)

(17,856

)

(45.5

)

(76,363

)

(45,793

)

(66.8

)

 

(13,957

)

 

(16,662

)

(23,681

)

Total segment operating income

 

147,641

 

108,127

 

36.5

 

411,230

 

318,074

 

29.3

 

 

67,525

 

 

19,000

 

127,346

 

Realized investment gains (losses) - investments(1)

 

(11,903

)

(31,968

)

 

 

112,769

 

(140,299

)

 

 

 

(42,933

)

 

89,414

 

57,930

 

Realized investment gains (losses) - derivatives

 

48,382

 

37,196

 

 

 

(15,653

)

124,321

 

 

 

 

(56

)

 

24,433

 

(33,665

)

Income tax expense

 

(62,287

)

(37,107

)

 

 

(167,921

)

(98,966

)

 

 

 

(8,116

)

 

(45,325

)

(49,062

)

Net income

 

$

121,833

 

$

76,248

 

59.8

 

$

340,425

 

$

203,130

 

67.6

 

 

$

16,420

 

 

$

87,522

 

$

102,549

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Investment gains (losses)(2)

 

$

(2,470

)

$

(27,949

)

 

 

$

147,091

 

$

(151,006

)

 

 

 

$

(35,056

)

 

$

80,672

 

$

70,555

 

Less: amortization related to DAC/VOBA and benefits and settlement expenses

 

9,433

 

4,019

 

 

 

34,322

 

(10,707

)

 

 

 

7,877

 

 

(8,742

)

12,625

 

Realized investment gains (losses) - investments

 

$

(11,903

)

$

(31,968

)

 

 

$

112,769

 

$

(140,299

)

 

 

 

$

(42,933

)

 

$

89,414

 

$

57,930

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivative gains (losses) (3)

 

$

41,769

 

$

32,212

 

 

 

$

(34,425

)

$

102,410

 

 

 

 

$

(4,948

)

 

$

22,031

 

$

(39,574

)

Less: VA GMWB economic cost

 

(6,613

)

(4,984

)

 

 

(18,772

)

(21,911

)

 

 

 

(4,892

)

 

(2,402

)

(5,909

)

Realized investment gains (losses) - derivatives

 

$

48,382

 

$

37,196

 

 

 

$

(15,653

)

$

124,321

 

 

 

 

$

(56

)

 

$

24,433

 

$

(33,665

)

 


(1)Includes credit related other-than-temporary impairments of $2.3 million and $5.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, and $8.7 million and $17.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.

(2)Includes realized investment gains (losses) before related amortization.

(3)Includes realized gains (losses) on derivatives before the VA GMWB economic cost.

Includes credit related other-than-temporary impairments of $0.5 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) and $1.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), respectively. We did not recognize any other-than-temporary impairments for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

(2)

Includes realized investment gains (losses) before related amortization.

(3)

Includes realized gains (losses) on derivatives before the VA GMWB economic cost.

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of February 1, 2015 to The Three Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2014, included a $39.5 million, or 36.5%, increase in segment operating income. The increase consisted of a $3.4 million increase in the Life Marketing segment, a $43.5 million increase in the Acquisition segment, a $0.3 million increase in the Stable Value Products segment, and a $1.6 million increase in the Asset Protection segment. These increases were partially offset by a $1.2 million decrease in the Annuities segment and an $8.1 million decrease in the Corporate and Other segment.

 

We experienced net realized gainslosses of $39.3$40.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as comparedperiod of February 1, 2015 to netMarch 31, 2015 (Successor Company). The losses realized gains of $4.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The gains realized for the three months ended September 30, 2014, were primarily related to $22.2net losses of $40.2 million of derivatives related to variable annuity contracts, $1.0 million of losses related to the net activity of the modified coinsurance portfolio, and net losses of $1.6 million related to other investment and derivative activity. Partially offsetting these losses were $0.4 million of gains related to investment securities sale activity, net gains of $22.0$2.0 million of derivatives related to FIA contracts, and net gains of $0.4 million related to IUL contracts.

Net income was $16.4 million and operating income was $67.5 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015.

·Life Marketing segment operating income was $4.3 million which consisted of universal life earnings of $9.5 million, a traditional operating loss of $2.9 million, and an operating loss of $2.3 million in other lines.

·Acquisitions segment operating income was $36.1 million. This included expected runoff of the in force blocks of business.

80



Table of Contents

·Annuities operating income was $31.4 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015. Included in that amount was $8.0 million of favorable single premium immediate annuities (“SPIA”) mortality results.

·Stable Value Products segment operating income of $6.1 million was primarily due to activity in average account values, operating spread, and participating mortgage income. Participating mortgage income was $1.2 million and the adjusted operating spread, which excludes participating income, was 159 basis points.

·Asset Protection segment operating income was $3.6 million which consisted of service contract earnings of $2.1 million, GAP product earnings of $1.1 million, and credit insurance earnings of $0.4 million.

·The Corporate and Other segment’s $14.0 million operating loss was primarily due to $33.5 million of total benefits and expenses offset by $16.8 million of net investment income and $2.7 million of premiums and policy fees.

For The Period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company)

We experienced net realized gains of $102.7 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company). The gains realized for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), were primarily related to  net gains of $75.9 million of derivatives related to variable annuity contracts, $3.2$15.9 million of gains related to derivatives with PLC, $6.9 million of gains related to investment securities sale activity, $5.0 million of gains related to the net activity of the modified coinsurance portfolio, and net gains of $0.3$1.2 million related to other investment and derivative activity. Partially offsetting these gains were net losses of $1.0 million of derivatives related to indexed universal life (“IUL”) contracts. Partially offsetting these gains were $2.3FIA contracts, net losses of $0.6 million of derivatives related to IUL contracts, and $0.5 million for other-than-temporary impairment credit-related losses,losses.

Net income was $87.5 million and operating income was $19.0 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015.

·Life Marketing segment operating loss was $2.3 million. Included in that amount was a $4.9traditional operating loss of $3.4 million, universal life earnings of $1.2 million, and operating loss of $0.1 million in other lines.

·Acquisitions segment operating income was $20.1 million. This included expected runoff of the in force blocks of business.

·Annuities segment operating income was $11.4 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015. Included in that amount was $2.8 million of favorable SPIA mortality results and $2.6 million of unfavorable unlocking.

·Stable Value Products segment operating income of $4.5 million was primarily due activity in average account values, operating spread, and participating mortgage income.  Participating mortgage income was $0.1 million and the adjusted operating spread, which excludes participating income, was 276 basis points.

·Asset Protection segment operating income was $1.9 million which consisted of $0.8 million in service contract earnings, $0.9 million in GAP product earnings, and credit insurance earnings of $0.2 million.

·The Corporate and Other segment’s $16.7 million operating loss was primarily due to $18.3 million of total benefits and expenses offset by $0.3 million of net investment income and $1.3 million of premiums and policy fees.

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company)

We experienced net realized gains of $31.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014, The gains realized for the three months ended March 31, 2014, were primarily related to net gains of $17.5 million of derivatives related to variable annuity contracts, $7.4 million of gains related to investment securities sale activity, $6.1 million of gains related to the net activity of the modified coinsurance portfolio, and net gains of $3.1 million of derivatives related to FIA contracts. Partially offsetting the gains were a $1.5 million loss related to other investment and derivative activity and net losses of $1.3$1.6 million of derivatives related to fixed indexed annuity (“FIA”) contracts.for other-than-temporary impairment credit-related losses.

Net income was $102.5 million and operating income was $127.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

 

7081



Table of Contents

 

·                  Life Marketing segment operating income was $31.6$22.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increasewhich consisted of $3.4traditional earnings of $15.5 million, or 12.1%, from the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase was primarily due to higher universal life premiumsearnings of $3.9 million, and policy fees, favorable traditional mortality, and higher investment income due to an increaseoperating earnings of $3.1 million in reserves. These items were largely offset by the impact of prospective unlocking and an increase in non-deferred expenses. The segment recorded an unfavorable $2.6 million of prospective unlocking for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to a favorable $2.4 million of prospective unlocking for the three months ended September 30, 2013.other lines.

 

·                  Acquisitions segment operating income was $72.9$61.0 million, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, an increase of $43.5 million as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to the impactThis included expected runoff of the MONY acquisition which occurred in the fourth quarterforce blocks of 2013. MONY operating income was $29.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. In addition, the increase was driven by a $15.9 million favorable variance related to prospective unlocking.  For the three months ended September 30, 2014, the segment recorded favorable prospective unlocking of $11.7 million as compared to an unfavorable $4.2 million of prospective unlocking for the three months ended September 30, 2013.business.

 

·                  Annuities segment operating income was $42.7$45.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to $43.8March 31, 2014. Included in this amount was $7.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 2.7%. This variance included anin unfavorable change in unlocking and other operating expenses partially offset by higher net policy fees and other income in the VA line and lower credited interest. The segment recorded an unfavorable $3.2 million of unlocking for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to favorable unlocking of $3.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013.SPIA mortality results.

 

·                  Stable Value Products segment operating income of $17.4 million was $19.5 million and increased $0.3 million, or 1.6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase in operating earnings resulted from an increase in participating mortgage income offset by lower adjusted operating spreads and a declineprimarily due activity in average account values.values, operating spread, and participating mortgage income. Participating mortgage income forwas $0.5 million and the three months ended September 30, 2014 was $3.9 million compared to $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The adjusted operating spread, which excludes participating income, decreased by 5was 262 basis points for the three months ended September 30, 2014 over the prior year.points.

 

·                  Asset Protection segment operating income was $7.0$4.8 million representing an increasewhich consisted of $1.6$2.4 million or 29.8%,in service contract earnings and $2.4 million in GAP product earnings. The credit product broke even for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. Service contract earnings increased $1.5 million, primarily due to lower losses. Credit insurance earnings increased $0.1 million, primarily resulting from lower expenses.  Earnings from the GAP product were consistent with the prior year.quarter.

 

·                  The Corporate and Other segmentsegment’s $23.7 million operating loss was $26.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to an operating loss of $17.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The change was primarily due to an $11.0$42.4 million unfavorable variance in other operatingof total benefits and expenses partially offset by a $2.3$14.0 million increase inof net investment income as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.and $4.4 million of premiums and policy fees.

 

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 as compared to The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, included a $93.2 million, or 29.3%, increase in segment operating income. The increase consisted of a $4.0 million increase in the Life Marketing segment, a $105.6 million increase in the Acquisition segment, a $16.3 million increase in the Annuities Segment, and a $3.2 million increase in the Asset Protection segment. These increases were partially offset by a $5.3 million decrease in the Stable Value Products segment and a $30.6 million decrease in the Corporate and Other segment.

We experienced net realized gains of $112.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to net realized losses of $48.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The gains realized for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, were primarily related to $49.8 million of gains related to investment securities sale activity, net gains of $60.2 million of derivatives related to variable annuity contracts, $18.1 million of gains related to the net activity of the modified coinsurance portfolio, and net gains of $0.1 million of derivatives related to IUL contracts. Partially offsetting these gains were $5.4 million for other-

7182



Table of Contents

 

than-temporary impairment credit-related losses, a $7.2 million loss related to other investment and derivative activity, and net losses of $2.9 million of derivatives related to FIA contracts.

·Life Marketing segment operating income was $79.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of $4.0 million, or 5.3%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The increase was primarily due to higher universal life premiums and policy fees, higher investment income due to an increase in reserves, and favorable traditional life mortality. This increase was largely offset by less favorable universal life mortality and unfavorable prospective unlocking compared to 2013. The segment recorded an unfavorable $2.6 million of prospective unlocking for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to a favorable $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

·Acquisitions segment operating income was $198.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, an increase of $105.6 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to the impact of the MONY acquisition which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2013. MONY operating income was $86.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. In addition, the increase was driven by a $15.9 million favorable variance related to prospective unlocking.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the segment recorded favorable prospective unlocking of $11.7 million as compared to an unfavorable $4.2 million of prospective unlocking for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

·Annuities segment operating income was $136.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to $120.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of $16.3 million, or 13.6%. This variance was a result of higher other income in the VA line and lower credited interest. These favorable variances were partially offset by unfavorable changes in unlocking, ceded policy fees, and other operating expenses. The segment recorded unfavorable unlocking of $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to favorable unlocking of $8.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

·Stable Value Products segment operating income was $54.2 million and decreased $5.3 million, or 8.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease in operating earnings resulted from a decrease in participating mortgage income and a decline in average account values. Participating mortgage income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $4.9 million compared to $9.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

·Asset Protection segment operating income was $18.5 million, representing an increase of $3.2 million, or 20.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Service contract earnings increased $3.1 million primarily due to higher volume and lower losses. Credit insurance earnings increased $0.8 million primarily due to lower losses and lower expenses in 2014. Earnings from the GAP product line decreased $0.7 million primarily from higher losses.

·Corporate and Other segment operating loss was $76.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to an operating loss of $45.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The change resulted from a $16.5 million unfavorable variance in other operating expenses and a $15.0 million decrease in net investment income as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

72



Table of Contents

Life Marketing

 

Segment results of operations

 

Segment results were as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross premiums and policy fees

 

$

377,014

 

$

356,809

 

5.7

%

$

1,226,218

 

$

1,217,852

 

0.7

%

 

$

243,678

 

 

$

136,068

 

$

412,111

 

Reinsurance ceded

 

(150,586

)

(145,075

)

(3.8

)

(550,661

)

(607,917

)

9.4

 

 

(68,383

)

 

(51,142

)

(194,019

)

Net premiums and policy fees

 

226,428

 

211,734

 

6.9

 

675,557

 

609,935

 

10.8

 

 

175,295

 

 

84,926

 

218,092

 

Net investment income

 

139,710

 

129,827

 

7.6

 

410,233

 

386,891

 

6.0

 

 

77,933

 

 

47,622

 

133,872

 

Other income

 

614

 

1,130

 

(45.7

)

1,663

 

2,093

 

(20.5

)

 

1,149

 

 

414

 

661

 

Total operating revenues

 

366,752

 

342,691

 

7.0

 

1,087,453

 

998,919

 

8.9

 

 

254,377

 

 

132,962

 

352,625

 

Realized gains (losses) - investments

 

1,388

 

3,603

 

(61.5

)

10,508

 

3,603

 

n/m

 

Realized gains (losses) - derivatives

 

339

 

 

n/m

 

54

 

 

n/m

 

Realized gains (losses)- investments

 

133

 

 

997

 

 

Realized gains (losses)- derivatives

 

412

 

 

(598

)

198

 

Total revenues

 

368,479

 

346,294

 

6.4

 

1,098,015

 

1,002,522

 

9.5

 

 

254,922

 

 

133,361

 

352,823

 

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

215,949

 

330,156

 

(34.6

)

819,615

 

866,995

 

(5.5

)

 

222,730

 

 

123,525

 

293,805

 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs

 

106,737

 

(24,284

)

n/m

 

148,179

 

16,804

 

n/m

 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition cost and value of business acquired

 

20,147

 

 

4,584

 

24,032

 

Other operating expenses

 

12,495

 

8,661

 

44.3

 

40,188

 

39,615

 

1.4

 

 

7,219

 

 

7,124

 

12,291

 

Operating benefits and expenses

 

335,181

 

314,533

 

6.6

 

1,007,982

 

923,414

 

9.2

 

Operating benefits and settlement expenses

 

250,096

 

 

135,233

 

330,128

 

Amortization related to benefits and settlement expenses

 

29

 

483

 

(94.0

)

1,740

 

483

 

n/m

 

 

409

 

 

(346

)

5

 

Amortization of DAC related to realized gains (losses)- investments

 

200

 

819

 

(75.6

)

3,555

 

819

 

n/m

 

Amortization of DAC/VOBA related to realized gains (losses) - investments

 

31

 

 

229

 

29

 

Total benefits and expenses

 

335,410

 

315,835

 

6.2

 

1,013,277

 

924,716

 

9.6

 

 

250,536

 

 

135,116

 

330,162

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX

 

33,069

 

30,459

 

8.6

 

84,738

 

77,806

 

8.9

 

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX

 

4,386

 

 

(1,755

)

22,661

 

Less: realized gains (losses)

 

1,727

 

3,603

 

 

 

10,562

 

3,603

 

 

 

 

545

 

 

399

 

198

 

Less: amortization related to benefits and settlement expenses

 

(29

)

(483

)

 

 

(1,740

)

(483

)

 

 

 

(409

)

 

346

 

(5

)

Less: related amortization of DAC

 

(200

)

(819

)

 

 

(3,555

)

(819

)

 

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

$

31,571

 

$

28,158

 

12.1

 

$

79,471

 

$

75,505

 

5.3

 

Less: related amortization of DAC/VOBA

 

(31

)

 

(229

)

(29

)

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

4,281

 

 

$

(2,271

)

$

22,497

 

 

7383



Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes key data for the Life Marketing segment:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Sales By Product

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Traditional

 

$

183

 

$

390

 

(53.1

)%

$

433

 

$

1,091

 

(60.3

)%

 

$

110

 

 

$

42

 

$

149

 

Universal life

 

33,058

 

32,261

 

2.5

 

93,942

 

123,437

 

(23.9

)

 

23,486

 

 

11,473

 

28,181

 

BOLI

 

 

 

n/m

 

22

 

 

n/m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

$

33,241

 

$

32,651

 

1.8

 

$

94,397

 

$

124,528

 

(24.2

)

 

$

23,596

 

 

$

11,515

 

$

28,330

 

Sales By Distribution Channel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Independent agents

 

$

24,587

 

$

23,395

 

5.1

 

$

70,945

 

$

86,040

 

(17.5

)

 

$

17,910

 

 

$

9,027

 

$

21,515

 

Stockbrokers / banks

 

7,923

 

8,608

 

(8.0

)

21,409

 

36,831

 

(41.9

)

 

4,892

 

 

2,169

 

6,224

 

BOLI / other

 

731

 

648

 

12.8

 

2,043

 

1,657

 

23.3

 

 

794

 

 

319

 

591

 

 

$

33,241

 

$

32,651

 

1.8

 

$

94,397

 

$

124,528

 

(24.2

)

 

$

23,596

 

 

$

11,515

 

$

28,330

 

Average Life Insurance In-force(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Life Insurance In-force(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Traditional

 

$

399,961,084

 

$

423,831,748

 

(5.6

)

$

405,583,949

 

$

430,538,542

 

(5.8

)

 

$

388,673,749

 

 

$

391,411,413

 

$

411,206,813

 

Universal life

 

139,804,885

 

109,933,560

 

27.2

 

132,052,762

 

100,813,147

 

31.0

 

 

157,764,363

 

 

153,317,720

 

124,300,639

 

 

$

539,765,969

��

$

533,765,308

 

1.1

 

$

537,636,711

 

$

531,351,689

 

1.2

 

 

$

546,438,112

 

 

$

544,729,133

 

$

535,507,452

 

Average Account Values

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Universal life

 

$

7,175,792

 

$

7,003,612

 

2.5

 

$

7,142,767

 

$

6,865,081

 

4.0

 

 

$

7,264,402

 

 

$

7,250,973

 

$

7,110,461

 

Variable universal life

 

561,709

 

468,595

 

19.9

 

545,762

 

440,238

 

24.0

 

 

582,946

 

 

574,257

 

529,816

 

 

$

7,737,501

 

$

7,472,207

 

3.6

 

$

7,688,529

 

$

7,305,319

 

5.2

 

 

$

7,847,348

 

 

$

7,825,230

 

$

7,640,277

 

 


(1)Amounts are not adjusted for reinsurance ceded.

 

Operating expenses detail

 

Other operating expenses for the segment were as follows:

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

Insurance companies

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

First year commissions

 

$

38,875

 

$

39,163

 

(0.7

)%

$

111,908

 

$

135,314

 

(17.3

)%

 

$

28,664

 

 

$

14,108

 

$

33,061

 

Renewal commissions

 

7,653

 

8,238

 

(7.1

)

22,319

 

25,426

 

(12.2

)

 

4,852

 

 

2,513

 

6,782

 

First year ceding allowances

 

(663

)

(939

)

29.4

 

(1,556

)

(3,034

)

48.7

 

 

(509

)

 

(49

)

(306

)

Renewal ceding allowances

 

(37,755

)

(40,322

)

6.4

 

(100,571

)

(120,393

)

16.5

 

 

(28,853

)

 

(12,364

)

(36,843

)

General & administrative

 

44,850

 

41,005

 

9.4

 

132,415

 

130,001

 

1.9

 

 

31,973

 

 

17,466

 

42,150

 

Taxes, licenses, and fees

 

7,236

 

8,152

 

(11.2

)

20,401

 

28,665

 

(28.8

)

 

5,175

 

 

2,509

 

5,778

 

Other operating expenses incurred

 

60,196

 

55,297

 

8.9

 

184,916

 

195,979

 

(5.6

)

 

41,302

 

 

24,183

 

50,622

 

Less: commissions, allowances & expenses capitalized

 

(47,701

)

(46,636

)

(2.3

)

(144,728

)

(156,364

)

7.4

 

 

(34,083

)

 

(17,059

)

(38,331

)

Other operating expenses

 

$

12,495

 

$

8,661

 

44.3

 

$

40,188

 

$

39,615

 

1.4

 

 

$

7,219

 

 

$

7,124

 

$

12,291

 

 

7484



Table of Contents

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of February 1, 2015 to The Three Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

Segment operating income

Operating income was $31.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increase of $3.4 million, or 12.1%, from the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase was primarily due to higher universal life premiums and policy fees, favorable traditional mortality, and higher investment income due to an increase in reserves. These items were largely offset by the impact of prospective unlocking and an increase in non-deferred expenses. The segment recorded an unfavorable $2.6 million of prospective unlocking for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to a favorable $2.4 million of prospective unlocking for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Operating revenues

Total operating revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014, increased $24.1 million, or 7.0%, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. This increase was driven by higher net premiums and policy fees due to continued growth in the universal life block and higher investment income due to increases in net in force reserves.

 

Net premiums and policy fees

 

Net premiums and policy fees increasedwere $175.3 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015.  Included in this amount are traditional net premiums of $99.5 million and universal life policy fees of $75.7 million.

Net investment income

Net investment income was $77.9 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015. Included in this amount is traditional net investment income of $10.0 million and universal life investment income of $66.1 million

Other income

Other income was $1.1 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 primarily due to fees on variable universal life funds.

Benefits and settlement expenses

Benefit and settlement expenses were $222.7 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015.  This amount includes traditional benefit and settlement expenses of $91.3 million and universal life benefit and settlement expenses of $131.5 million, including $53.0 million of interest on funds for universal life policies.

Amortization of DAC and VOBA

DAC and VOBA amortization was $20.1 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015.

Other operating expenses

Other operating expenses were $7.2 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015.  Other operating expenses for the insurance companies reflect commissions of $33.5 million, general and administrative expenses of $32.0 million, and taxes of $5.2 million, partly offset by $14.7ceding allowances of $29.4 million or 6.9%,and capitalization of $34.1 million.

Sales

Sales for the segment were $23.6 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015, comprised primarily of universal life sales.

For The Period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company)

Net premiums and policy fees

Net premiums and policy fees were $84.9 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015. This amount is comprised of traditional net premiums of $41.8 million and universal life policy fees of $43.1 million.

Net investment income

Net investment income was $47.6 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015. Included in this amount is traditional net investment income of $6.3 million and universal life investment income of $40.1 million.

Other income

Other income was $0.4 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015, primarily due to fees on variable universal life funds.

85



Table of Contents

Benefits and settlement expenses

Benefit and settlement expenses were $123.5 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015. This amount includes traditional benefit and settlement expenses of $44.7 million, including an elevated level of claims and universal life benefit and settlement expenses of $77.7 million, partly comprised of $25.7 million of interest on funds for universal life policies.

Amortization of DAC and VOBA

DAC and VOBA amortization was $4.6 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015.

Other operating expenses

Other operating expenses were $7.1 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015.  Other operating expenses for the insurance companies reflect commissions of $16.6 million, general and administrative expenses of $17.5 million, and taxes of $2.5 million, partly offset by ceding allowances of $12.4 million and capitalization of $17.1 million.

Sales

Sales for the segment were $11.5 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015, almost entirely comprised of universal life sales.

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company)

Net premiums and policy fees

Net premiums and policy fees were $218.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, due to continued growth in theMarch 31, 2014. This amount is comprised of traditional net premiums of $125.3 million and universal life block, partially offset by decreases in traditional life premiums.policy fees of $92.6 million.

 

Net investment income

 

Net investment income in the segment increased $9.9was $133.9 million or 7.6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. Of the increaseMarch 31, 2014. Included in this amount is traditional net investment income $4.7of $15.5 million was attributable to a net increase inand universal life reserves. Additionally, traditional life investment income increased $4.5 million primarily due to higher reserve balances.of $115.0 million.

 

Other income

 

Other income decreased $0.5was $0.7 million or 45.7%, for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to fees on variable universal life funds.

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

Benefits and settlement expenses decreased by $114.2 million, or 34.6%,were $293.8 for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, due primarily to the impactMarch 31, 2014. This amount includes traditional benefit and settlement expenses of unlocking and favorable traditional$102.5 million and universal life mortality, which was partially offset by growth in retainedbenefit and settlement expenses of $191.4 million, partly comprised of $75.9 million of interest on funds for universal life insurance in-force.policies. For the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2014, universal life and BOLI unlocking was largely driven by mortality and lapses. The impact of these changes decreased policy benefits and settlement expenses $78.7 million as compared to an increase of $41.2 million in the three months ended September 30, 2013. Unlocking in 2014 was largely driven by assumption changes to mortality, reinsurance and yields. Reinsurance, lapses, yields, and credited interest contributed to the unlocking in 2013.$4.2 million.

 

Amortization of DAC and VOBA

 

DAC and VOBA amortization increased $131.0was $24.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to the impact of unlocking.March 31, 2014. For the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2014, universal life and BOLI unlocking increased amortization by $90.6 million, largely driven by assumption changes to mortality, reinsurance and yields. For the three months ended September 30, 2013, universal life and BOLI unlocking decreased amortization $40.3$4.6 million.

 

7586



Table of Contents

 

Other operating expenses

 

Other operating expenses increased $3.8were $12.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared toMarch 31, 2014. Other operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2013. This increase reflects higher new business acquisition costs associated with slightly higher salesinsurance companies reflect commissions of $39.8 million, general and higher general administrative expenses of $3.8$42.2 million, and taxes of $5.8 million, partly offset by ceding allowances of $37.1 million and capitalization of $38.3 million.

 

Sales

 

Sales for the segment increased $0.6were $28.3 million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 as compared to The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

Segment operating income

Operating income was $79.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, representing an increasecomprised primarily of $4.0 million, or 5.3%, from the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The increase was primarily due to higher universal life premiums and policy fees, higher investment income due to an increase in reserves, and favorable traditional life mortality. This increase was largely offset by less favorable universal life mortality and unfavorable prospective unlocking compared to 2013. The segment recorded an unfavorable $2.6 millionsales of prospective unlocking for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to a favorable $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Operating revenues

Total operating revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, increased $88.5 million, or 8.9%, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. This increase was driven by higher net premiums and policy fees due to continued growth in the universal life block and higher investment income due to increases in net in force reserves.

Net premiums and policy fees

Net premiums and policy fees increased by $65.6 million, or 10.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, due to an increase in premiums and policy fees associated with growth of the universal life block of business, and the impact of unlocking on ceded premiums, which was almost entirely offset in benefit and settlement expense in the second quarter of 2014. The increase was partially offset by decreases in traditional life premiums.

Net investment income

Net investment income in the segment increased $23.3 million, or 6.0%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Of the increase in net investment income, $14.9 million was the result of a net increase in universal life reserves. Additionally, traditional life investment income increased $6.8 million due to higher reserves, higher tax benefits and lower funding costs.

Other income

Other income decreased $0.4 million, or 20.5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to fees on variable universal life funds.

Benefits and settlement expenses

Benefits and settlement expenses decreased by $47.4 million, or 5.5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, due to the impact of unlocking and favorable traditional life mortality, partially offset by growth in retained universal life insurance in-force and less favorable

76



Table of Contents

mortality in the universal life block. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, universal life and BOLI unlocking decreased policy benefits and settlement expenses $57.5 million as compared to an increase of $42.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Unlocking in 2014 was largely driven by assumption changes to mortality, reinsurance, and yields. Of the total impact due to unlocking, $23.5 million is offset within the decline in ceded premiums in the second quarter of 2014. Reinsurance, lapses, yields, and credited interest contributed to the unlocking in 2013.

Amortization of DAC

DAC amortization increased $131.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to differing impacts of unlocking. In 2014, universal life and BOLI unlocking increased amortization $95.8 million, as compared to a decrease of $42.6 million in 2013.

Other operating expenses

Other operating expenses increased $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. This increase reflects higher general administrative expenses offset by reduced new business acquisition costs associated with lower sales.

Sales

Sales for the segment decreased $30.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Universal life sales decreased $29.5 million due to sales in 2013 of a product we are no longer marketing.$28.2 million.

 

Reinsurance

 

Currently, the Life Marketing segment reinsures significant amounts of its life insurance in-force. Pursuant to the underlying reinsurance contracts, reinsurers pay allowances to the segment as a percentage of both first year and renewal premiums. Reinsurance allowances represent the amount the reinsurer is willing to pay for reimbursement of acquisition costs incurred by the direct writer of the business. A portion of reinsurance allowances received is deferred as part of DAC and a portion is recognized immediately as a reduction of other operating expenses. As the non-deferred portion of allowances reduces operating expenses in the period received, these amounts represent a net increase to operating income during that period.

 

Reinsurance allowances do not affect the methodology used to amortize DAC or the period over which such DAC is amortized. However, they do affect the amounts recognized as DAC amortization. DAC on universal life-type, limited-payment long duration, and investment contracts business is amortized based on the estimated gross profits of the policies in-force. Reinsurance allowances are considered in the determination of estimated gross profits, and therefore, impact DAC amortization on these lines of business. Deferred reinsurance allowances on level term business are recorded as ceded DAC, which is amortized over estimated ceded premiums of the policies in-force. Thus, deferred reinsurance allowances may impact DAC amortization. A more detailed discussion of the components of reinsurance can be found in the Reinsurance section of Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

7787



Table of Contents

 

Impact of reinsurance

 

Reinsurance impacted the Life Marketing segment line items as shown in the following table:table

 

Life Marketing Segment

Line Item Impact of Reinsurance

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reinsurance ceded

 

$

(150,586

)

$

(145,075

)

$

(550,661

)

$

(607,917

)

 

$

(68,383

)

 

(51,142

)

$

(194,019

)

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

(131,579

)

(121,278

)

(558,976

)

(596,141

)

 

(61,735

)

 

(58,501

)

(198,781

)

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs

 

(26,144

)

(9,279

)

(45,333

)

(33,717

)

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

(794

)

 

(3,766

)

(9,473

)

Other operating expenses (1)

 

(36,119

)

(35,227

)

(101,763

)

(101,592

)

 

(28,038

)

 

(11,728

)

(32,293

)

Total benefits and expenses

 

(193,842

)

(165,784

)

(706,072

)

(731,450

)

 

(90,567

)

 

(73,995

)

(240,547

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET IMPACT OF REINSURANCE (2)

 

$

43,256

 

$

20,709

 

$

155,411

 

$

123,533

 

NET IMPACT OF REINSURANCE

 

$

22,184

 

 

22,853

 

$

46,528

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Allowances received

 

$

(38,418

)

$

(41,261

)

$

(102,127

)

$

(120,427

)

 

$

(29,362

)

 

(12,413

)

$

(37,149

)

Less: Amount deferred

 

2,299

 

6,034

 

364

 

18,835

 

 

1,324

 

 

685

 

4,856

 

Allowances recognized (ceded other operating expenses) (1)

 

$

(36,119

)

$

(35,227

)

$

(101,763

)

$

(101,592

)

 

$

(28,038

)

 

(11,728

)

$

(32,293

)

 


(1)Other operating expenses ceded per the income statement are equal to reinsurance allowances recognized after capitalization.

(2)Assumes no investment income on reinsurance. Foregone investment income would substantially reduce the favorable impact of reinsurance The Company estimates that the impact of foregone investment income would reduce the net impact of reinsurance by 90% to 160%.

 

The table above does not reflect the impact of reinsurance on our net investment income. By ceding business to the assuming companies, we forgo investment income on the reserves ceded. Conversely, the assuming companies will receive investment income on the reserves assumed, which will increase the assuming companies’ profitability on the business that we cede. The net investment income impact to us and the assuming companies has not been quantified. The impact of including foregone investment income would be to substantially reduce the favorable net impact of reinsurance reflected above. We estimate that the impact of foregone investment income would be to reduce the net impact of reinsurance presented in the table above by 90%100% to 160%225%. The Life Marketing segment’s reinsurance programs do not materially impact the “other income” line of our income statement.

 

As shown above, reinsurance had a favorable impact on the Life Marketing segment’s operating income for the periods presented above. The impact of reinsurance is largely due to our quota share coinsurance program in place prior to mid-2005. Under that program, generally 90% of the segment’s traditional new business was ceded to reinsurers. Since mid-2005, a much smaller percentage of overall term business has been ceded due to a change in reinsurance strategy on traditional business. In addition, since 2012, a much smaller percentage of the segment’s new universal life business has been ceded. As a result of that change, the relative impact of reinsurance on the Life Marketing segment’s overall results is expected to decrease over time. While the significance of reinsurance is expected to decline over time, the overall impact of reinsurance for a given period may fluctuate due to variations in mortality and unlocking of balances and variations from term business during the post level premium period..

 

7888



Table of Contents

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of February 1, 2015 to The Three Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

 

The higherceded premiums were primarily comprised of ceded traditional life premiums of $5.7 million and universal life premiums of $63.0 million. Traditional ceded premiums for 2014 as comparedthe period February 1, 2015 to 2013March 31, 2015 were caused primarilyimpacted by higher universal life premiumsrunoff and policy feesa number of $4.4 million. Ceded universal life premiums increasedpolicies with the increase in the direct universal life premiums and policy fees.post level period activity.

 

Ceded benefits and settlement expenses were higher$61.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as comparedperiod of February 1, 2015 to the three months ended September 30, 2013, due to higher universal lifeMarch 31, 2015. This amount is driven by ceded claims, partiallypartly offset by decreaseschange in ceded reserves. Traditional ceded benefits decreased $4.3activity of $2.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013,was due to lower ceded claims, slightlydeath benefits, largely offset by an increase in ceded reserves. Universal life ceded benefits increased $14.7of $59.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, due to higher ceded claims partially offset by a decrease in changewere mainly comprised of $59.7 million in ceded reserves. Ceded universal life claims were $19.0 million higher forduring the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.period.

 

Ceded amortization of deferred policy acquisitions costs increasedDAC and VOBA activity was $0.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as comparedperiod of February 1, 2015 to the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to the differences in unlocking between the two periods.March 31, 2015.

 

Ceded other operating expenses reflect the impact of reinsurance allowances on net income. Allowances decreased in the traditional life block, reflecting runoff of business and increased in the universal life block reflecting the impact of unlocking on reinsurance.

 

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of January 1, 2015 to The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company)

 

The lower ceded premiums for 2014 as compared to 2013 were caused primarily by lower universal life premiums and policy feescomprised of $11.5 million and lowerceded traditional life premiums of $46.5$22.6 million and universal life premiums of $27.2 million. Ceded traditional premiumTraditional ceded premiums for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 decreased from the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily dueperiod January 1, 2015 to fluctuations in theJanuary 31, 2015 were impacted by runoff and a number of policies entering theirwith post level period. Ceded universal life premiums for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 decreased from the nine months ended September 30, 2013 primarily due to the second quarter 2014 impact of unlocking on ceded premiums, almost entirely offset in benefit and settlement expenses.activity.

 

Ceded benefits and settlement expenses were lower$58.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as comparedperiod of January 1, 2015 to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, due to a decrease inJanuary 31, 2015.  This amount is driven by ceded claims, partly offset by change in ceded reserves, partially offset by higher ceded claims.reserves. Traditional ceded benefits decreased $47.5activity of $29.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013,was due to a decrease in change in ceded reserves and a decrease in ceded death benefits.benefits, partly offset by ceded reserves. Universal life ceded benefits increased $11.0of $30.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, due to an increasewere mainly comprised of $30.4 million in ceded claims, partially offset by a decrease in ceded reserves due to the impact of unlocking on ceded premium. Ceded universal life claims were $68.2 million higher forduring the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013.period.

 

Ceded amortization of deferred policy acquisitions costs increasedDAC and VOBA activity was $3.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as comparedperiod of January 1, 2015 to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to the differences in unlocking between the two periods.January 31, 2015.

 

Ceded other operating expenses reflect the impact of reinsurance allowances on net income. Allowances decreased in the

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company)

The ceded premiums for 2014 were primarily comprised of ceded traditional line reflecting runofflife premiums of business,$99.0 million and increased in the universal life line reflectingpremiums of $94.6 million. Traditional ceded premiums for the allowance pattern on older business, changes inthree months ended March 31, 2014 were impacted by runoff and a number of policies with post level activity.

Ceded benefits and settlement expenses were $198.8 million for the mix of business, andthree months ended March 31, 2014.  This amount was primarily driven by the impact of unlockingceded claims, with traditional ceded death benefits of $127.3 million and universal life ceded death benefits of $81.7 million.

Ceded amortization of DAC and VOBA costs was $9.5 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014.

Ceded other operating expenses reflect the impact of reinsurance allowances on reinsurance.net income.

 

7989



Table of Contents

 

Acquisitions

 

Segment results of operations

 

Segment results were as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January  31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross premiums and policy fees

 

$

270,959

 

$

194,379

 

39.4

%

$

872,356

 

$

611,299

 

42.7

%

 

$

191,902

 

 

$

88,855

 

$

295,830

 

Reinsurance ceded

 

(90,744

)

(92,970

)

2.4

 

(293,459

)

(292,229

)

(0.4

)

 

(48,560

)

 

(26,512

)

(100,369

)

Net premiums and policy fees

 

180,215

 

101,409

 

77.7

 

578,897

 

319,070

 

81.4

 

 

143,342

 

 

62,343

 

195,461

 

Net investment income

 

219,453

 

133,695

 

64.1

 

656,113

 

403,050

 

62.8

 

 

113,692

 

 

71,088

 

216,102

 

Other income

 

3,036

 

1,004

 

n/m

 

10,386

 

3,033

 

n/m

 

 

2,191

 

 

1,240

 

4,061

 

Total operating revenues

 

402,704

 

236,108

 

70.6

 

1,245,396

 

725,153

 

71.7

 

 

259,225

 

 

134,671

 

415,624

 

Realized gains (losses) - investments

 

(14,718

)

(24,992

)

41.1

 

119,927

 

(163,726

)

n/m

 

 

(32,627

)

 

73,601

 

71,115

 

Realized gains (losses) - derivatives

 

20,536

 

28,951

 

(29.1

)

(91,609

)

190,820

 

n/m

 

 

32,191

 

 

(68,511

)

(59,791

)

Total revenues

 

408,522

 

240,067

 

70.2

 

1,273,714

 

752,247

 

69.3

 

 

258,789

 

 

139,761

 

426,948

 

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

295,252

 

173,423

 

70.2

 

919,849

 

530,773

 

73.3

 

 

205,847

 

 

100,693

 

308,364

 

Amortization of value of business acquired

 

2,703

 

18,030

 

(85.0

)

37,106

 

54,904

 

(32.4

)

 

(130

)

 

4,803

 

18,062

 

Other operating expenses

 

31,820

 

15,226

 

n/m

 

89,634

 

46,235

 

93.9

 

 

17,438

 

 

9,041

 

28,202

 

Operating benefits and expenses

 

329,775

 

206,679

 

59.6

 

1,046,589

 

631,912

 

65.6

 

 

223,155

 

 

114,537

 

354,628

 

Amortization related to benefits and settlement expenses

 

2,564

 

104

 

n/m

 

13,595

 

104

 

n/m

 

Amortization related to benefits and settlement expenses(1)

 

2,409

 

 

1,233

 

7,500

 

Amortization of VOBA related to realized gains (losses) - investments

 

612

 

398

 

53.8

 

1,393

 

1,514

 

(8.0

)

 

(10

)

 

230

 

510

 

Total benefits and expenses

 

332,951

 

207,181

 

60.7

 

1,061,577

 

633,530

 

67.6

 

 

225,554

 

 

116,000

 

362,638

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX

 

75,571

 

32,886

 

n/m

 

212,137

 

118,717

 

78.7

 

 

33,235

 

 

23,761

 

64,310

 

Less: realized gains (losses)

 

5,818

 

3,959

 

 

 

28,318

 

27,094

 

 

 

 

(436

)

 

5,090

 

11,324

 

Less: amortization related to benefits and settlement expenses

 

(2,564

)

(104

)

 

 

(13,595

)

(104

)

 

 

Less: amortization related to benefits and settlement expenses(1)

 

(2,409

)

 

(1,233

)

(7,500

)

Less: related amortization of VOBA

 

(612

)

(398

)

 

 

(1,393

)

(1,514

)

 

 

 

10

 

 

(230

)

(510

)

OPERATING INCOME

 

$

72,929

 

$

29,429

 

n/m

 

$

198,807

 

$

93,241

 

n/m

 

 

$

36,070

 

 

$

20,134

 

$

60,996

 

 

8090



Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes key data for the Acquisitions segment:

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

Average Life Insurance In-Force(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Average Life Insurance In-Force(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Traditional

 

$

186,577,010

 

$

166,134,343

 

12.3

%

$

190,139,888

 

$

169,083,110

 

12.5

%

 

$

180,098,499

 

 

182,177,575

 

$

193,786,319

 

Universal life

 

34,619,902

 

27,475,762

 

26.0

 

35,366,654

 

28,050,853

 

26.1

 

 

33,071,531

 

 

33,413,557

 

36,169,275

 

 

$

221,196,912

 

$

193,610,105

 

14.2

 

$

225,506,542

 

$

197,133,963

 

14.4

 

 

$

213,170,030

 

 

215,591,132

 

$

229,955,594

 

Average Account Values

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Universal life

 

$

4,540,271

 

$

3,318,872

 

36.8

 

$

4,573,397

 

$

3,338,832

 

37.0

 

 

$

4,489,381

 

 

4,486,843

 

$

4,596,540

 

Fixed annuity(2)

 

3,765,858

 

3,018,382

 

24.8

 

3,795,553

 

3,048,919

 

24.5

 

Fixed annuity(2)

 

3,695,824

 

 

3,712,578

 

3,826,812

 

Variable annuity

 

1,462,919

 

577,578

 

n/m

 

1,492,537

 

576,569

 

n/m

 

 

1,410,627

 

 

1,396,587

 

1,511,562

 

 

$

9,769,048

 

$

6,914,832

 

41.3

 

$

9,861,487

 

$

6,964,320

 

41.6

 

 

$

9,595,832

 

 

9,596,008

 

$

9,934,914

 

Interest Spread - UL & Fixed Annuities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income yield(3)

 

5.66

%

5.73

%

 

 

5.67

%

5.70

%

 

 

Net investment income yield(3)

 

4.34

%

 

5.73

%

5.64

%

Interest credited to policyholders

 

3.97

 

4.02

 

 

 

3.98

 

3.99

 

 

 

 

3.98

 

 

4.05

 

3.96

 

Interest spread

 

1.69

%

1.71

%

 

 

1.69

%

1.71

%

 

 

 

0.36

%

 

1.68

%

1.68

%

 


(1)Amounts are not adjusted for reinsurance ceded.

(2)Includes general account balances held within variable annuity products and is net of coinsurance ceded.

(3)Earned rates exclude portfolios supporting modified coinsurance and crediting rates exclude 100% cessions.

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of February 1, 2015 to The Three Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

Segment operating income

Operating income was $72.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, an increase of $43.5 million as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to the impact of the MONY acquisition which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2013. MONY operating income was $29.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014. In addition, the increase was driven by a $15.9 million favorable variance related to prospective unlocking.  For the three months ended September 30, 2014, the segment recorded favorable prospective unlocking of $11.7 million as compared to an unfavorable $4.2 million of prospective unlocking for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Operating revenues

 

NetOperating revenues for the segment were $259.2 million and included net premiums and policy fees increased $78.8of $143.3 million, or 77.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to the impactnet investment income of the MONY acquisition which occurred$113.7 million, and other income of $2.2 million. The segment experienced expected runoff in the fourth quarter of 2013. MONY net premiums for the three months ended September 30, 2014 were $79.1 million, and were partly offset by runoff of other business. Net investment income increased $85.8 million, or 64.1%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, due to the $94.0 million impact of MONY partly offset by expected runoff of business.current period.

 

Total benefits and expenses

 

Total benefits and expenses increased $125.8were $225.6 million, or 60.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase was primarily due to the MONY acquisition increasing operating benefits and expenses $145.7of $223.2 million. Operating benefits and expenses included benefits and settlement expenses of $205.8 million, partly offset by runoffamortization of value of business acquired of $0.1 million, and theother operating expenses of $17.4 million. The net impact of favorable unlockingamortization related to benefits and settlement expenses and amortization of $9.7VOBA related to realized gains (losses) on investments contributed $2.4 million to total benefits and expenses.

For The Period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company)

Operating revenues

Operating revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to an unfavorable $1.7segment were $134.7 million for three months ended September 30, 2013.and included net premiums and policy fees of $62.3 million, net investment income of $71.1 million, and other income of $1.2 million. The segment experienced expected runoff in the current period.

 

8191



Table of Contents

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 as compared to The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

Segment operating income

Operating income was $198.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, an increase of $105.6 million as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to the impact of the MONY acquisition which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2013. MONY operating income was $86.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. In addition, the increase was driven by a $15.9 million favorable variance related to prospective unlocking.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the segment recorded favorable prospective unlocking of $11.7 million as compared to an unfavorable $4.2 million of prospective unlocking for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Operating revenues

Net premiums and policy fees increased $259.8 million, or 81.4%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. This was primarily due to the impact of the MONY acquisition which occurred in the fourth quarter of 2013. MONY net premiums for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were $282.5 million, and were partly offset by runoff of other business. Net investment income increased $253.1 million, or 62.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, due to the $272.9 million impact of MONY, partly offset by expected runoff of business.

 

Total benefits and expenses

 

Total benefits and expenses increased $428.0were $116.0 million, or 67.6%,primarily due to operating benefits and expenses of $114.5 million. Operating benefits and expenses included benefits and settlement expenses of $100.7 million, amortization of value of business acquired of $4.8 million, and other operating expenses of $9.0 million. The net impact of amortization related to benefits and settlement expenses and amortization of VOBA related to realized gains (losses) on investments contributed $1.5 million to total benefits and expenses.

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company)

Operating revenues

Net premiums and policy fees were $195.5 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2014, as compared toMarch 31, 2014. Net investment income was $216.1 million for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2013.March 31, 2014. The increasesegment experienced expected runoff.

Total benefits and expenses

Total benefits and expenses were $362.6 million for the three months ended March 31, 2014. The activity was primarily due to the MONY acquisition, partly offset by the impact of favorable unlocking of $6.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to an unfavorable $2.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.acquisition. The MONY acquisition increased operating benefits and expenses $475.9$158.5 million.

Reinsurance

 

The Acquisitions segment currently reinsures portions of both its life and annuity in-force. The cost of reinsurance to the segment is reflected in the chart shown below. A more detailed discussion of the components of reinsurance can be found in the Reinsurance section of Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies  of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company).

82



Table of Contents

Impact of reinsurance

 

Reinsurance impacted the Acquisitions segment line items as shown in the following table:

 

Acquisitions Segment

Line Item Impact of Reinsurance

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reinsurance ceded

 

$

(90,744

)

$

(92,970

)

$

(293,459

)

$

(292,229

)

 

$

(48,560

)

 

$

(26,512

)

$

(100,369

)

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

(69,300

)

(65,336

)

(240,838

)

(238,789

)

 

(34,290

)

 

(25,832

)

(89,736

)

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs

 

(3,544

)

(2,718

)

(9,703

)

(7,307

)

Amortization of value of business acquired

 

(8

)

 

(233

)

(2,979

)

Other operating expenses

 

(12,027

)

(12,014

)

(34,972

)

(36,460

)

 

(8,285

)

 

(3,647

)

(10,887

)

Total benefits and expenses

 

(84,871

)

(80,068

)

(285,513

)

(282,556

)

 

(42,583

)

 

(29,712

)

(103,602

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET IMPACT OF REINSURANCE (1)

 

$

(5,873

)

$

(12,902

)

$

(7,946

)

$

(9,673

)

 

$

(5,977

)

 

$

3,200

 

$

3,233

 

 


(1)Assumes no investment income on reinsurance. Foregone investment income would substantially reduce the favorable impact of reinsurance.

92



Table of Contents

 

The segment’s reinsurance programs do not materially impact the other income line of the income statement. In addition, net investment income generally has no direct impact on reinsurance cost. However, by ceding business to the assuming companies, we forgo investment income on the reserves ceded to the assuming companies. Conversely, the assuming companies will receive investment income on the reserves assumed which will increase the assuming companies’ profitability on business assumed from the Company. For business ceded under modified coinsurance arrangements, the amount of investment income attributable to the assuming company is included as part of the overall change in policy reserves and, as such, is reflected in benefit and settlement expenses. The net investment income impact to us and the assuming companies has not been quantified as it is not fully reflected in our consolidated financial statements.

 

The net impact of reinsurance was more favorable by $7.0 millionactivity for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as comparedperiod of February 1, 2015 to the three months ended September 30, 2013,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) was primarily due to a favorable impact from the MONY acquisition. In the three months ended September 30, 2014, ceded revenues decreased by $2.2 million andpremiums in relation to ceded benefits and settlement expenses. Ceded benefits and settlement expenses increasedwere primarily driven by $4.8 million as the impact of the MONY acquisition more than offset runoff in other blocks.ceded claims.

 

The net impact of reinsurance was more favorable by $1.7 millionactivity for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as comparedperiod of January 1, 2015 to the nine months ended September 30, 2013,January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) was primarily due to a favorable impact from the MONY acquisition. In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, ceded revenues increased by $1.2 million andpremiums in relation to ceded benefits and settlement expenses. Ceded benefits and settlement expenses increasedwere primarily driven by $3.0 million as theceded claims.

The net impact of reinsurance activity for the MONY acquisition more than offset runoffthree months ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company) was primarily due to ceded premiums in other blocks.relation to ceded benefits and settlement expenses.  Ceded benefits and settlement expenses were primarily driven by ceded claims.

 

8393



Table of Contents

 

Annuities

Segment results of operations

 

Segment results were as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross premiums and policy fees

 

$

38,614

 

$

34,870

 

10.7

%

$

112,445

 

$

96,387

 

16.7

%

 

$

24,948

 

 

$

12,473

 

$

36,272

 

Reinsurance ceded

 

(18,640

)

(17,582

)

(6.0

)

(53,832

)

(34,361

)

(56.7

)

 

(14,418

)

 

(6,118

)

(17,590

)

Net premiums and policy fees

 

19,974

 

17,288

 

15.5

 

58,613

 

62,026

 

(5.5

)

 

10,530

 

 

6,355

 

18,682

 

Net investment income

 

117,646

 

116,702

 

0.8

 

351,946

 

352,050

 

n/m

 

 

50,932

 

 

37,189

 

117,468

 

Realized gains (losses) - derivatives

 

(6,613

)

(4,984

)

(32.7

)

(18,772

)

(21,911

)

14.3

 

 

(4,892

)

 

(2,402

)

(5,909

)

Other income

 

37,204

 

32,589

 

14.2

 

107,071

 

88,760

 

20.6

 

 

26,674

 

 

12,690

 

34,665

 

Total operating revenues

 

168,211

 

161,595

 

4.1

 

498,858

 

480,925

 

3.7

 

 

83,244

 

 

53,832

 

164,906

 

Realized gains (losses) - investments

 

4,787

 

236

 

n/m

 

7,734

 

10,227

 

(24.4

)

 

(605

)

 

(145

)

609

 

Realized gains (losses) - derivatives, net of economic cost

 

27,368

 

8,234

 

n/m

 

76,053

 

(55,672

)

n/m

 

 

(33,295

)

 

77,231

 

26,460

 

Total revenues

 

200,366

 

170,065

 

17.8

 

582,645

 

435,480

 

33.8

 

 

49,344

 

 

130,918

 

191,975

 

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

77,165

 

80,723

 

(4.4

)

231,239

 

242,711

 

(4.7

)

 

32,448

 

 

26,919

 

77,431

 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

18,428

 

11,744

 

56.9

 

45,417

 

35,830

 

26.8

 

 

(2,404

)

 

6,217

 

14,545

 

Other operating expenses

 

29,959

 

25,303

 

18.4

 

85,612

 

82,124

 

4.2

 

 

21,827

 

 

9,333

 

27,602

 

Operating benefits and expenses

 

125,552

 

117,770

 

6.6

 

362,268

 

360,665

 

0.4

 

 

51,871

 

 

42,469

 

119,578

 

Amortization related to benefits and settlement expenses

 

290

 

(2,276

)

n/m

 

2,297

 

(3,132

)

n/m

 

 

(612

)

 

3,128

 

2,233

 

Amortization of DAC related to realized gains (losses) - investments

 

5,738

 

4,491

 

27.8

 

11,742

 

(10,495

)

n/m

 

 

5,650

 

 

(13,216

)

2,348

 

Total benefits and expenses

 

131,580

 

119,985

 

9.7

 

376,307

 

347,038

 

8.4

 

 

56,909

 

 

32,381

 

124,159

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX

 

68,786

 

50,080

 

37.4

 

206,338

 

88,442

 

n/m

 

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX

 

(7,565

)

 

98,537

 

67,816

 

Less: realized gains (losses) - investments

 

4,787

 

236

 

 

 

7,734

 

10,227

 

 

 

 

(605

)

 

(145

)

609

 

Less: realized gains (losses) - derivatives, net of economic cost

 

27,368

 

8,234

 

 

 

76,053

 

(55,672

)

 

 

 

(33,295

)

 

77,231

 

26,460

 

Less: amortization related to benefits and settlement expenses

 

(290

)

2,276

 

 

 

(2,297

)

3,132

 

 

 

 

612

 

 

(3,128

)

(2,233

)

Less: related amortization of DAC

 

(5,738

)

(4,491

)

 

 

(11,742

)

10,495

 

 

 

Less: related amortization of DAC/VOBA

 

(5,650

)

 

13,216

 

(2,348

)

OPERATING INCOME

 

$

42,659

 

$

43,825

 

(2.7

)

$

136,590

 

$

120,260

 

13.6

 

 

$

31,373

 

 

$

11,363

 

$

45,328

 

 

8494



Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes key data for the Annuities segment:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed annuity

 

$

267,604

 

$

180,714

 

48.1

%

$

717,359

 

$

434,165

 

65.2

%

 

$

42,476

 

 

$

28,335

 

$

236,154

 

Variable annuity

 

279,458

 

357,484

 

(21.8

)

686,966

 

1,656,066

 

(58.5

)

 

184,147

 

 

59,115

 

180,205

 

 

$

547,062

 

$

538,198

 

1.6

 

$

1,404,325

 

$

2,090,231

 

(32.8

)

 

$

226,623

 

 

$

87,450

 

$

416,359

 

Average Account Values

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed annuity(1)

 

$

8,243,541

 

$

8,214,702

 

0.4

 

$

8,212,895

 

$

8,251,504

 

(0.5

)

 

$

8,263,820

 

 

$

8,171,438

 

$

8,182,141

 

Variable annuity

 

12,456,974

 

10,989,161

 

13.4

 

12,268,923

 

10,354,702

 

18.5

 

 

12,579,000

 

 

12,365,217

 

12,035,056

 

 

$

20,700,515

 

$

19,203,863

 

7.8

 

$

20,481,818

 

$

18,606,206

 

10.1

 

 

$

20,842,820

 

 

$

20,536,655

 

$

20,217,197

 

Interest Spread - Fixed Annuities(2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income yield

 

5.47

%

5.50

%

 

 

5.48

%

5.51

%

 

 

 

3.48

%

 

5.22

%

5.51

%

Interest credited to policyholders

 

3.33

 

3.50

 

 

 

3.34

 

3.54

 

 

 

 

2.89

 

 

3.17

 

3.35

 

Interest spread

 

2.14

%

2.00

%

 

 

2.14

%

1.97

%

 

 

 

0.59

%

 

2.05

%

2.16

%

 


(1)         Includes general account balances held within variable annuity products.

(2)         Interest spread on average general account values.

 

8595



Table of Contents

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Derivatives related to variable annuity contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate futures - VA

 

$

1,979

 

$

(2,255

)

$

4,234

 

$

12,777

 

$

(26,393

)

$

39,170

 

 

$

(48

)

 

$

1,413

 

$

4,250

 

Equity futures - VA

 

861

 

(12,568

)

13,429

 

(9,049

)

(39,829

)

30,780

 

 

(32,469

)

 

9,221

 

(2,651

)

Currency futures - VA

 

10,185

 

(6,531

)

16,716

 

6,020

 

1,440

 

4,580

 

 

6,137

 

 

7,778

 

(1,278

)

Variance swaps - VA

 

1,570

 

(1,347

)

2,917

 

(1,103

)

(9,566

)

8,463

 

 

 

 

 

(1,850

)

Equity options - VA

 

2,050

 

(29,094

)

31,144

 

(31,240

)

(65,631

)

34,391

 

 

(21,774

)

 

3,047

 

(12,341

)

Interest rate swaptions - VA

 

(2,812

)

1,725

 

(4,537

)

(17,213

)

(738

)

(16,475

)

 

(11,328

)

 

9,268

 

(9,403

)

Interest rate swaps - VA

 

22,011

 

(19,224

)

41,235

 

124,548

 

(125,502

)

250,050

 

 

(54,791

)

 

122,710

 

57,368

 

Embedded derivative - GMWB(1)

 

(11,407

)

40,379

 

(51,786

)

(51,869

)

146,693

 

(198,562

)

 

35,870

 

 

(68,503

)

(27,315

)

Funds withheld derivative

 

(2,432

)

32,207

 

(34,639

)

27,298

 

42,045

 

(14,747

)

 

38,236

 

 

(9,073

)

10,699

 

Total derivatives related to variable annuity contracts

 

 

22,005

 

 

3,292

 

 

18,713

 

 

60,169

 

 

(77,481

)

 

137,650

 

 

(40,167

)

 

75,861

 

17,479

 

Derivatives related to FIA contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative - FIA

 

(2,462

)

(104

)

(2,358

)

(9,036

)

(145

)

(8,891

)

 

(2,583

)

 

1,769

 

1,733

 

Equity futures - FIA

 

117

 

(42

)

159

 

1,067

 

(42

)

1,109

 

 

184

 

 

(184

)

345

 

Volatility futures - FIA

 

(4

)

 

(4

)

4

 

 

4

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Equity options - FIA

 

1,099

 

104

 

995

 

5,077

 

85

 

4,992

 

Equity options- FIA

 

4,375

 

 

(2,617

)

994

 

Total derivatives related to FIA contracts

 

(1,250

)

(42

)

(1,208

)

(2,888

)

(102

)

(2,786

)

 

1,980

 

 

(1,032

)

3,072

 

VA GMWB economic costs(2)

 

6,613

 

4,984

 

1,629

 

18,772

 

21,911

 

(3,139

)

Economic cost - VA GMWB(2)

 

4,892

 

 

2,402

 

5,909

 

Realized gains (losses) - derivatives, net of economic cost

 

$

27,368

 

$

8,234

 

$

19,134

 

$

76,053

 

$

(55,672

)

$

131,725

 

 

$

(33,295

)

 

$

77,231

 

$

26,460

 

 


(1)         Includes impact of nonperformance risk of $2.6$(3.7) million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), $3.1 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and $(0.9) million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2014 and a net zero impact for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and $(2.4) million and $(4.3) million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively.(Predecessor Company).

(2)         Economic cost is the long-term expected average cost of providing the product benefit over the life of the policy based on product pricing assumptions. These include assumptions about the economic/market environment, and elective and non-elective policy owner behavior (e.g. lapses, withdrawal timing, mortality, etc.).

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

As of

 

 

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

GMDB - Net amount at risk(1)

 

$

85,265

 

$

85,137

 

0.2

%

 

$

79,331

 

 

$

82,346

 

GMDB Reserves

 

16,275

 

13,324

 

22.1

 

 

24,153

 

 

21,403

 

GMWB and GMAB Reserves

 

(41,998

)

(93,881

)

55.3

 

 

(10,819

)

 

25,964

 

Account value subject to GMWB rider

 

9,711,404

 

9,513,847

 

2.1

 

GMWB Benefit Base

 

9,741,126

 

9,162,797

 

6.3

 

GMAB Benefit Base

 

5,035

 

5,441

 

(7.5

)

Account value subject to GMWB rider(2)

 

9,822,111

 

 

9,738,496

 

GMWB Benefit Base(2)

 

9,929,753

 

 

9,837,891

 

GMAB Benefit Base(2)

 

4,587

 

 

4,967

 

S&P 500® Index

 

1,972

 

1,848

 

6.7

 

 

2,068

 

 

2,059

 

 


(1)Guaranteed benefits in excess of contract holder account balance.

(2)These account balances are not impacted by the effect of reinsurance.

 

8696



Table of Contents

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of February 1, 2015 to The Three Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

Segment operating income

Segment operating income was $42.7 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to $43.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013, a decrease of $1.2 million, or 2.7%. This variance included an unfavorable change in unlocking and other operating expenses partially offset by higher net policy fees and other income in the VA line and lower credited interest. The segment recorded an unfavorable $3.2 million of unlocking for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to favorable unlocking of $3.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

 

Operating revenues

 

Segment operating revenues increased $6.6were $83.2 million or 4.1%,for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015. Operating revenue consisted of $50.9 million of net investment income, $24.9 million of gross policy fees, $14.4 million of ceded premiums, $26.7 million in other income, and $4.9 million related to GMWB economic cost from the VA line of business.

Benefits and settlement expenses

Benefits and settlement expenses were $32.4 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015. Included in that amount was $8.0 million of favorable SPIA mortality results, which was partially offset by an increase in guaranteed benefit reserves from the VA line of business.

Amortization of DAC and VOBA

DAC and VOBA amortization was $2.4 million favorable for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 due to the allocation of negative VOBA to some of the products within the segment.

Other operating expenses

Other operating expenses were $21.8 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015. Operating expenses consisted of $5.5 million in acquisition expenses, $7.7 million in maintenance and overhead expenses, and $8.6 million in commission expenses.

Sales

Total sales were $226.6 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015. Fixed annuity sales were $42.5 million and variable annuity sales were $184.1 million.

For The Period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company)

Operating revenues

Segment operating revenues were $53.8 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015. Operating revenue consisted of $37.2 million of net investment income, $12.5 million of gross policy fees, $6.1 million of ceded premiums, $12.7 million in other income and $2.4 million related to GMWB economic cost from the VA line of business.

Benefits and settlement expenses

Benefits and settlement expenses were $26.9 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015. Included in that amount was $2.8 million of unfavorable SPIA mortality results and a $2.1 million increase in guaranteed benefit reserves from the VA line of business.

97



Table of Contents

Amortization of DAC

DAC and VOBA amortization was $6.2 million unfavorable for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015.The segment recorded $2.6 million in unfavorable unlocking.

Other operating expenses

Other operating expenses were $9.3 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015. Operating expenses consisted of $2.8 million in acquisition expenses, $2.8 million in maintenance and overhead expenses, and $3.7 million in commission expenses.

Sales

Total sales were $87.5 million for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015. Fixed annuity sales were $28.3 million and variable annuity sales were $59.1 million.

.

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company)

Operating revenues

Segment operating revenues were $164.9 million for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to an increase inwhich consisted of $117.5 million of net investment income, $36.3 million of gross policy fees, and$17.6 million of ceded premiums $34.7 million in other income, fromand $5.9 million in GMWB economic cost related to the VA line of business. Those increases were partially offset by increased GMWB economic cost in the VA line of business. Average fixed account balances increased 0.4% and average variable account balances grew 13.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

Benefits and settlement expenses decreased $3.6were $77.4 million or 4.4%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.  This decrease was primarily the result of lower credited interest and a $1.3March 31, 2014. Included in these results are $7.5 million favorable change in unlocking. Partially offsetting these favorable changes was a $1.1 million unfavorable change in guaranteed benefit reserves.

Amortization of DAC

DAC amortization increased $6.7 million, or 56.9%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to an unfavorable change in unlocking. DAC unlocking for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was $3.6 million unfavorable as compared to $4.4 million favorable unlocking for the three months ended September 30, 2013.

Other operating expenses

Other operating expenses increased $4.7 million, or 18.4%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase is primarily due to higher renewal commissions.

Sales

Total sales increased $8.9 million, or 1.6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. Sales of variable annuities decreased $78.0 million, or 21.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months September 30, 2013. Sales of fixed annuities increased by $86.9 million, or 48.1% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013, driven by an increase in FIA sales.

87



Table of Contents

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 as compared to The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013

Segment operating income

Segment operating income was $136.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to $120.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013, an increase of $16.3 million, or 13.6%. This variance was a result of higher other income in the VA line and lower credited interest. These favorable variances were partially offset by unfavorable changes in unlocking, ceded policy fees, and other operating expenses. The segment recorded unfavorable unlocking of $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to favorable unlocking of $8.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Operating revenues

Segment operating revenues increased $17.9 million, or 3.7%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to an increase in other income from the VA line of business along with a decrease in GMWB economic cost. Those increases were partially offset by increased ceded policy fees. Average fixed account balances decreased 0.5% while average variable account balances grew 18.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Benefits and settlement expenses

Benefits and settlement expenses decreased $11.5 million, or 4.7%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. This decrease was primarily the result of lower credited interest, lower realized losses in the MVA annuities line and a $0.8 million favorable change in unlocking. These favorable changes were partially offset by unfavorable changes in guaranteed benefit reserves and the SPIA mortality variance.results and $0.9 million of unfavorable unlocking.

 

Amortization of DAC

 

DAC and VOBA amortization increased $9.6was $14.5 million or 26.8%, for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to an unfavorable changeMarch 31, 2014. Include in unlocking. DAC unlocking for the nine months ended September 30, 2014this amount was $1.0$0.5 million unfavorable as compared to $9.6 millionin favorable unlocking for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

unlocking.

Other operating expenses

Other operating expenses increased $3.5 million, or 4.2%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The increase is due to higher renewal commissions partially offset by lower acquisition expenses and lower guaranty fund allocations.

Sales

 

Total sales decreased $685.9were $416.4 million or 32.8%, for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Sales ofMarch 31, 2014. Fixed annuity sales were $236.2 million and variable annuities decreased $969.1 million, or 58.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Sales of fixed annuities increased by $283.2 million, or 65.2% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, driven by an increase in FIA sales.

88



Table of Contentsannuity sales were $180.2 million.

Reinsurance

 

During the year ended December 31, 2013,2012 (Predecessor Company), the Annuity segment began reinsuring certain risks associated with the GMWB and GMDB riders to Shades Creek Captive Insurance Company (“Shades Creek”), a direct wholly subsidiary of PLC. The cost of reinsurance to the segment is reflected in the chart shown below. The impact of the Shades Creek reinsurance arrangement for the three month period ending March 31, 2013 was eliminated in consolidation.  Prior to April 1, 2013, wethe Company paid as a dividend all of Shades Creek’s outstanding common stock to its parent, PLC. A more detailed discussion of the components of reinsurance can be found in the Reinsurance section of Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company).

98



Table of Contents

 

Impact of reinsurance

 

Reinsurance impacted the Annuities segment line items as shown in the following table:

 

Annuities Segment

Line Item Impact of Reinsurance

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reinsurance ceded

 

$

(18,640

)

$

(17,582

)

$

(53,832

)

$

(34,361

)

 

$

(14,418

)

 

$

(6,118

)

$

(17,590

)

Realized gains (losses) - derivatives

 

11,315

 

10,798

 

33,605

 

21,381

 

Realized (gains) losses - derivatives

 

7,500

 

 

3,754

 

11,078

 

Total operating revenues

 

(7,325

)

(6,784

)

(20,227

)

(12,980

)

 

(6,918

)

 

(2,364

)

(6,512

)

Realized gains (losses) - derivatives, net of economic cost

 

26,276

 

(18,752

)

122,930

 

(96,874

)

Realized (gains) losses - derivatives, net of economic cost

 

(46,654

)

 

125,688

 

54,593

 

Total revenues

 

18,951

 

(25,536

)

102,703

 

(109,854

)

 

(53,572

)

 

123,324

 

48,081

 

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

(866

)

(241

)

(1,626

)

(1,093

)

 

(471

)

 

(567

)

(429

)

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs

 

92

 

497

 

912

 

(1,834

)

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

 

 

304

 

173

 

Other operating expenses

 

(532

)

(561

)

(1,623

)

(1,128

)

 

5

 

 

(523

)

(549

)

Operating benefits and expenses

 

(1,306

)

(305

)

(2,337

)

(4,055

)

 

(466

)

 

(786

)

(805

)

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs related to realized gain (loss) investments

 

5,757

 

(4,074

)

24,888

 

(25,160

)

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs related to realized (gain) loss investments

 

 

 

402

 

10,635

 

Total benefit and expenses

 

4,451

 

(4,379

)

22,551

 

(29,215

)

 

(466

)

 

(384

)

9,830

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET IMPACT OF REINSURANCE

 

$

14,500

 

$

(21,157

)

$

80,152

 

$

(80,639

)

 

$

(53,106

)

 

$

123,708

 

$

38,251

 

 

The table above does not reflect the impact of reinsurance on our net investment income. The net investment income impact to us and the assuming company has been quantified and is immaterial. The Annuities segment’s reinsurance programs do not materially impact the “other income” line of our income statement.

 

The net impact of reinsurance is unfavorable by $35.7$53.1 million for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), $123.7 million favorable for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and $160.8$38.3 million favorable for the three months and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2014 respectively. These impacts were(Predecessor Company), primarily due to realized gainslosses on derivatives that were ceded that were partially offset by favorable changes in DAC amortization.ceded.

 

8999



Table of Contents

Stable Value Products

Segment results of operations

 

Segment results were as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income

 

$

28,781

 

$

29,478

 

(2.4

)%

$

83,737

 

$

93,203

 

(10.2

)%

 

$

10,373

 

 

$

6,888

 

$

27,778

 

Other income

 

 

 

n/m

 

1

 

 

n/m

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total operating revenues

 

28,781

 

29,478

 

(2.4

)

83,738

 

93,203

 

(10.2

)

 

10,373

 

 

6,888

 

27,778

 

Realized gains (losses)

 

9,938

 

(4,271

)

n/m

 

9,958

 

(1,468

)

n/m

 

 

(31

)

 

1,293

 

73

 

Total revenues

 

38,719

 

25,207

 

53.6

 

93,696

 

91,735

 

2.1

 

 

10,342

 

 

8,181

 

27,851

 

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

8,793

 

9,639

 

(8.8

)

28,126

 

31,925

 

(11.9

)

 

3,919

 

 

2,255

 

9,808

 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs

 

96

 

110

 

(12.7

)

295

 

287

 

2.8

 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

 

 

25

 

100

 

Other operating expenses

 

386

 

523

 

(26.2

)

1,127

 

1,477

 

(23.7

)

 

339

 

 

79

 

473

 

Total benefits and expenses

 

9,275

 

10,272

 

(9.7

)

29,548

 

33,689

 

(12.3

)

 

4,258

 

 

2,359

 

10,381

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX

 

29,444

 

14,935

 

97.1

 

64,148

 

58,046

 

10.5

 

 

6,084

 

 

5,822

 

17,470

 

Less: realized gains (losses)

 

9,938

 

(4,271

)

 

 

9,958

 

(1,468

)

 

 

 

(31

)

 

1,293

 

73

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

$

19,506

 

$

19,206

 

1.6

 

$

54,190

 

$

59,514

 

(8.9

)

 

$

6,115

 

 

$

4,529

 

$

17,397

 

100



Table of Contents

 

The following table summarizes key data for the Stable Value Products segment:

 

 

Successor

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

GIC

 

$

15,000

 

$

80,200

 

(81.3

)%

$

40,850

 

$

397,504

 

(89.7

)%

 

$

50,700

 

 

$

 

$

25,850

 

GFA - Direct Institutional

 

 

 

n/m

 

50,000

 

 

n/m

 

 

100,000

 

 

 

 

 

$

15,000

 

$

80,200

 

(81.3

)

$

90,850

 

$

397,504

 

(77.1

)

 

$

150,700

 

 

$

 

$

25,850

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Average Account Values

 

$

2,358,842

 

$

2,503,294

 

(5.8

)%

$

2,478,224

 

$

2,529,382

 

(2.0

)%

 

$

1,863,209

 

 

$

1,932,722

 

$

2,580,025

 

Ending Account Values

 

$

2,261,546

 

$

2,531,262

 

(10.7

)%

$

2,261,546

 

$

2,531,262

 

(10.7

)%

 

$

1,923,684

 

 

$

1,911,751

 

$

2,537,504

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Operating Spread

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Net investment income yield

 

4.88

%

4.71

%

 

 

4.51

%

4.91

%

 

 

 

3.38

%

 

4.28

%

4.31

%

Interest credited

 

1.49

 

1.54

 

 

 

1.51

 

1.68

 

 

 

 

1.28

 

 

1.40

 

1.52

 

Operating expenses

 

0.08

 

0.10

 

 

 

0.08

 

0.09

 

 

 

 

0.11

 

 

0.07

 

0.09

 

Operating spread

 

3.31

%

3.07

%

 

 

2.92

%

3.14

%

 

 

 

1.99

%

 

2.81

%

2.70

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adjusted operating spread(1)

 

2.64

%

2.69

%

 

 

2.65

%

2.64

%

 

 

Adjusted operating spread(1)

 

1.59

%

 

2.76

%

2.62

%

 


(1)Excludes participating mortgage loan income and other income.

 

90



Table of Contents

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of February 1, 2015 to The Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

Segment operating income

Operating income was $19.5 million and increased $0.3 million, or 1.6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase in operating earnings resulted from an increase in participating mortgage income offset by lower adjusted operating spreads and a decline in average account values. Participating mortgage income for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was $3.9 million compared to $2.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The adjusted operating spread, which excludes participating income, decreased by 5 basis points for the three months ended September 30, 2014 over the prior year.

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 as compared to The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

 

Segment operating income

 

Operating income of $6.1 million was $54.2 million and decreased $5.3 million, or 8.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as comparedprimarily due to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease in operating earnings resulted from a decrease in participating mortgage income and a declineactivity in average account values.values, operating spread, and participating mortgage income. Participating mortgage income forwas $1.2 million and the nine months ended September 30,adjusted operating spread, which excludes participating income, was 159 basis points.

For The Period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company)

Segment operating income

Operating income of $4.5 million was primarily due activity in average account values, operating spread, and participating mortgage income.  Participating mortgage income was $0.1 million and the adjusted operating spread, which excludes participating income, was 276 basis points.

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company)

Segment operating income

Operating income of $17.4 million was $4.9primarily due activity in average account values, operating spread, and participating mortgage income. Participating mortgage income was $0.5 million compared to $9.5 million forand the nine months ended September 30, 2013.adjusted operating spread, which excludes participating income, was 262 basis points.

 

91101



Table of Contents

 

Asset Protection

Segment resultsResults of operationsOperations

 

Segment results were as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross premiums and policy fees

 

$

64,602

 

$

63,050

 

2.5

%

$

192,122

 

$

190,213

 

1.0

%

 

$

43,194

 

 

$

21,843

 

$

63,701

 

Reinsurance ceded

 

(23,132

)

(21,997

)

(5.2

)

(66,905

)

(65,730

)

(1.8

)

 

(15,452

)

 

(7,860

)

(21,527

)

Net premiums and policy fees

 

41,470

 

41,053

 

1.0

 

125,217

 

124,483

 

0.6

 

 

27,742

 

 

13,983

 

42,174

 

Net investment income

 

4,615

 

4,761

 

(3.1

)

14,151

 

14,325

 

(1.2

)

 

2,445

 

 

1,540

 

4,782

 

Other income

 

31,192

 

30,343

 

2.8

 

87,876

 

84,901

 

3.5

 

 

19,109

 

 

9,043

 

25,890

 

Total operating revenues

 

77,277

 

76,157

 

1.5

 

227,244

 

223,709

 

1.6

 

 

49,296

 

 

24,566

 

72,846

 

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

23,853

 

24,957

 

(4.4

)

71,414

 

73,556

 

(2.9

)

 

15,387

 

 

7,447

 

23,957

 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs

 

5,883

 

5,920

 

(0.6

)

18,522

 

16,948

 

9.3

 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

4,742

 

 

1,858

 

6,137

 

Other operating expenses

 

40,579

 

39,915

 

1.7

 

118,773

 

117,858

 

0.8

 

 

25,524

 

 

13,354

 

37,943

 

Total benefits and expenses

 

70,315

 

70,792

 

(0.7

)

208,709

 

208,362

 

0.2

 

 

45,653

 

 

22,659

 

68,037

 

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX

 

6,962

 

5,365

 

29.8

 

18,535

 

15,347

 

20.8

 

 

3,643

 

 

1,907

 

4,809

 

OPERATING INCOME

 

$

6,962

 

$

5,365

 

29.8

 

$

18,535

 

$

15,347

 

20.8

 

 

$

3,643

 

 

$

1,907

 

$

4,809

 

 

The following table summarizes key data for the Asset Protection segment:

 

 

Successor

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Sales

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit insurance

 

$

7,754

 

$

9,105

 

(14.8

)%

$

22,812

 

$

26,290

 

(13.2

)%

 

$

3,882

 

 

$

2,087

 

$

6,842

 

Service contracts

 

96,869

 

95,696

 

1.2

 

266,934

 

264,027

 

1.1

 

 

57,047

 

 

26,551

 

75,819

 

GAP

 

19,193

 

18,140

 

5.8

 

54,951

 

50,359

 

9.1

 

 

15,232

 

 

6,318

 

16,747

 

 

$

123,816

 

$

122,941

 

0.7

 

$

344,697

 

$

340,676

 

1.2

 

 

$

76,161

 

 

$

34,956

 

$

99,408

 

Loss Ratios(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Loss Ratios(1)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Credit insurance

 

30.5

%

19.5

%

 

 

29.2

%

34.8

%

 

 

 

40.5

%

 

27.9

%

40.2

%

Service contracts

 

60.3

 

65.5

 

 

 

58.9

 

62.2

 

 

 

 

52.3

 

 

54.4

 

56.9

 

GAP

 

59.6

 

60.8

 

 

 

64.0

 

57.0

 

 

 

 

77.1

 

 

61.5

 

66.3

 

 


(1)Incurred claims as a percentage of earned premiums.premiums

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 as compared to The Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

Segment operating income

Operating income was $7.0 million, representing an increase of $1.6 million, or 29.8%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. Service contract earnings

92102



Table of Contents

 

increased $1.5 million, primarily dueFor The Period of February 1, 2015 to lower losses. Credit insurance earnings increased $0.1 million, primarily resulting from lower expenses.  Earnings from the GAP product were consistent with the prior year.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

 

Net premiums and policy fees

 

Net premiums and policy fees increased $0.4were $27.7 million or 1.0%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.which consisted of service contract premiums of $20.6 million, GAP premiums increased $0.9of $4.8 million, and credit insurance premiums increased $0.1 million, primarily due to lower ceded premiums.  The increases were somewhat offset by a decrease in service contract premiums of $0.6 million, primarily due to higher ceded premiums.$2.3 million.

Other income

 

Other income increased $0.8activity consisted of $16.0 million or 2.8%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013 due primarily to higher volume infrom the service contract line and $3.1 million from the GAP product lines.line.

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

Benefits and settlement expenses decreased $1.1activity was $10.8 million or 4.4%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.  Servicein service contract claims, decreased $2.0$3.7 million resulting from lower loss ratios and higher ceded losses.  The decrease was partially offset by an increase in GAP claims of $0.5and $0.9 million resulting from lower ceded losses and an increase in credit insurance claims of $0.4 million due to higher loss ratios.claims.

 

Amortization of DAC and Other operating expenses

 

Amortization of DAC remained relatively unchanged forconsisted of $2.5 million in the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared tocredit insurance line, $2.0 million in the three months ended September 30, 2013.GAP line, and $0.2 million in the service contract line primarily resulting from amortization of VOBA activity.  Other operating expenses increased $0.7were $25.5 million or 1.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014.including activity in all product lines.

 

Sales

 

Total segment sales increased $0.9consisted of $57.1 million or 0.7%, forin the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. Higher auto sales helped drive increased service contract line, $15.2 million in the GAP product line, and credit insurance sales of $1.2 million and GAP product sales of $1.1$3.9 million. Credit insurance sales decreased $1.4 million due to decreasing demand for this product.

 

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of January 1, 2015 to The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company)

Segment operating income

Operating income was $18.5 million, representing an increase of $3.2 million, or 20.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Service contract earnings increased $3.1 million primarily due to higher volume and lower losses. Credit insurance earnings increased $0.8 million primarily due to lower losses and lower expenses in 2014. Earnings from the GAP product line decreased $0.7 million primarily from higher losses.

Net premiums and policy fees

 

Net premiums and policy fees increased $0.7 million, or 0.6%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. GAP premiums increased $2.8 million primarily due to lower ceded premiums.  Credit insurance premiums increased $0.5 million.  The increases were partially offset by a decrease inconsisted of service contract premiums of $2.6$10.4 million, primarily due to higher cededGAP premiums of $2.4 million, and $1.2 million of credit insurance premiums.

93



Table of Contents

 

Other income

 

Other income increased $3.0consisted of $7.7 million or 3.5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013 due primarily to higher volume infrom the service contract line and $1.4 million from the GAP product lines.line.

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

Benefits and settlement expenses decreased $2.1 million, or 2.9%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Service contract claims decreased $4.7 million due to higher ceded losses and lower loss ratios. Credit insurance claims decreased $0.4 million,was primarily due to lower loss ratios.  The decreases were partially offset by an increase inservice contract claims of $5.6 million, GAP claims of $3.0$1.5 million, due to higher loss ratios.and credit insurance claims of $0.3 million.

 

Amortization of DAC and Other operating expenses

 

Amortization of DAC was $1.6consisted of $1.1 million or 9.3%, higher for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to a $1.9 million increase in GAP amortization due to a decrease in ceded activity in the credit insurance line, $0.5 million in the service contract line, and $0.2 million in the GAP product line.  Other operating expenses increased $0.9were $13.4 million or 0.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.including  activity in all product lines.

 

Sales

 

Total segment sales increasedconsisted of $26.6 million in the service contract line, $6.3 million in the GAP product line, and credit insurance sales of $2.1 million.

103



Table of Contents

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company)

Net premiums and policy fees

Net premiums and policy fees consisted of service contract premiums of $31.4 million, GAP premiums of $6.8 million, and $4.0 million or 1.2%, forof credit insurance premiums.

Other income

Other income consisted of $22.3 million from the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Higher auto sales helped drive increased service contract line and $3.6 million from the GAP product line.

Benefits and settlement expenses

Benefits and settlement expenses was primarily due to service contract claims of $17.8 million, GAP claims of $4.5 million, and credit insurance claims of $1.6 million.

Amortization of DAC and Other operating expenses

Amortization of DAC consisted of $3.5 million in the credit insurance line, $2.2 million in the service contract line, and $0.5 million in the GAP line.  Other operating expenses were $37.9 million from activity in all product lines.

Sales

Total segment sales consisted of $75.8 million in the service contract line, $16.8 million in the GAP product line, and credit insurance sales of $2.9 million and GAP product sales of $4.6$6.8 million. Credit insurance sales decreased $3.5 million due to decreasing demand for this product.

 

Reinsurance

 

The majority of the Asset Protection segment’s reinsurance activity relates to the cession of single premium credit life and credit accident and health insurance, vehicle service contracts, and guaranteed asset protection insurance to producer affiliated reinsurance companies (“PARC’s”PARCs”). These arrangements are coinsurance contracts ceding the business on a first dollar quota share basis at 100% to limit our exposure and allow the PARC’sPARCs to share in the underwriting income of the product. Reinsurance contracts do not relieve us from our obligations to our policyholders. A more detailed discussion of the components of reinsurance can be found in the Reinsurance section of Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies to our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

94104



Table of Contents

 

Reinsurance impacted the Asset Protection segment line items as shown in the following table:

 

Asset Protection Segment

Line Item Impact of Reinsurance

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reinsurance ceded

 

$

(23,132

)

$

(21,997

)

$

(66,905

)

$

(65,730

)

 

$

(15,453

)

 

$

(7,860

)

$

(21,527

)

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

(14,134

)

(14,048

)

(42,719

)

(40,388

)

 

(9,488

)

 

(4,249

)

(13,304

)

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs

 

(1,843

)

(3,250

)

(5,888

)

(10,649

)

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

36

 

 

(481

)

(2,286

)

Other operating expenses

 

(1,942

)

(1,833

)

(5,806

)

(5,600

)

 

(1,402

)

 

(653

)

(1,652

)

Total benefits and expenses

 

(17,919

)

(19,131

)

(54,413

)

(56,637

)

 

(10,854

)

 

(5,383

)

(17,242

)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

NET IMPACT OF REINSURANCE (1)

 

$

(5,213

)

$

(2,866

)

$

(12,492

)

$

(9,093

)

 

$

(4,599

)

 

$

(2,477

)

$

(4,285

)

 


(1)Assumes no investment income on reinsurance. Foregone investment income would substantially change the impact of reinsurance.

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of February 1, 2015 to The Three Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

 

Reinsurance premiums ceded increased $1.1of $15.5 million or 5.2%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase was primarily due to an increaseconsisted of ceded premiums in ceded service contract premiums, partially offset by a decline in ceded dealer credit insurance premiums due to lower sales and a decrease in GAP ceded premiums.all product lines.

 

Benefits and settlement expenses ceded remained relatively unchanged at $14.1of $9.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and the three months ended September 30, 2013. Lowerwas primarily due to losses on ceded losses in the dealer credit line were offset by higher ceded lossesbusiness in the service contract and GAP product lines.

 

Amortization of DAC ceded decreased $1.4 million, or 43.3%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease was primarily due to a change in the mix of business in the GAP line. Other operating expenses ceded remained consistent forof $1.4 million was mainly due to ceded activity in the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.credit and GAP product lines.

 

Net investment income has no direct impact on reinsurance cost. However, by ceding business to the assuming companies, we forgo investment income on the reserves ceded. Conversely, the assuming companies will receive investment income on the reserves assumed which generally will increase the assuming companies’ profitability on business we cede. The net investment income impact to us and the assuming companies has not been quantified as it is not reflected in our consolidated condensed financial statements.

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of January 1, 2015 to The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company)

 

Reinsurance premiums ceded increased $1.2of $7.9 million or 1.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The increase was primarily due to an increaseconsisted of ceded premiums in ceded service contract premiums, somewhat offset by a decline in ceded dealer credit insurance premiums due to lower sales and a decrease in GAP ceded premiums.all product lines.

 

Benefits and settlement expenses ceded increased $2.3of $4.2 million or 5.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease was primarily due to higherlosses on ceded lossesbusiness in the service contract line.and GAP product lines.

Amortization of DAC ceded of $0.5 million was primarily the result of ceded activity in the GAP and credit product lines. Other operating expenses ceded of $0.7 million was mainly due to ceded activity in the credit and GAP product lines.

Net investment income has no direct impact on reinsurance cost. However, by ceding business to the assuming companies, we forgo investment income on the reserves ceded. Conversely, the assuming companies will receive investment income on the reserves assumed which generally will increase the assuming companies’ profitability on

 

95105



Table of Contents

 

business we cede. The net investment income impact to us and the assuming companies has not been quantified as it is not reflected in our consolidated condensed financial statements.

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company)

Reinsurance premiums ceded of $21.5 million consisted of ceded premiums in all product lines.

Benefits and settlement expenses ceded of $13.3 million was primarily due to losses on ceded business in the service contract and GAP product lines.

Amortization of DAC ceded decreased $4.8of $2.3 million or 44.7%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013,was primarily as the result of a change in the mix of businessceded activity in the GAP and credit product line.lines. Other operating expenses ceded increased $0.2of $1.7 million or 3.7%, forwas mainly due to ceded activity in the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013.credit product line.

 

Net investment income has no direct impact on reinsurance cost. However, by ceding business to the assuming companies, we forgo investment income on the reserves ceded. Conversely, the assuming companies will receive investment income on the reserves assumed which generally will increase the assuming companies’ profitability on business we cede. The net investment income impact to us and the assuming companies has not been quantified as it is not reflected in our consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

96106



Table of Contents

Corporate and Other

 

Segment results of operations

 

Segment results were as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

REVENUES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross premiums and policy fees

 

$

4,111

 

$

4,556

 

(9.8

)%

$

12,665

 

$

13,865

 

(8.7

)%

 

$

2,664

 

 

$

1,343

 

$

4,409

 

Reinsurance ceded

 

(2

)

(4

)

50.0

 

(8

)

(8

)

n/m

 

 

 

 

 

(1

)

Net premiums and policy fees

 

4,109

 

4,552

 

(9.7

)

12,657

 

13,857

 

(8.7

)

 

2,664

 

 

1,343

 

4,408

 

Net investment income

 

22,656

 

20,309

 

11.6

 

56,294

 

71,329

 

(21.1

)

 

16,836

 

 

278

 

14,035

 

Realized gains (losses) - derivatives

 

 

 

 

 

Other income

 

358

 

457

 

(21.7

)

2,217

 

1,808

 

22.6

 

 

58

 

 

1

 

237

 

Total operating revenues

 

27,123

 

25,318

 

7.1

 

71,168

 

86,994

 

(18.2

)

 

19,558

 

 

1,622

 

18,680

 

Realized gains (losses) - investments

 

(3,944

)

(2,588

)

(52.4

)

(1,241

)

105

 

n/m

 

 

(1,930

)

 

4,919

 

(1,401

)

Realized gains (losses) - derivatives

 

218

 

74

 

n/m

 

54

 

(10,574

)

n/m

 

 

640

 

 

16,318

 

(373

)

Total revenues

 

23,397

 

22,804

 

2.6

 

69,981

 

76,525

 

(8.6

)

 

18,268

 

 

22,859

 

16,906

 

BENEFITS AND EXPENSES

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Benefits and settlement expenses

 

4,632

 

5,701

 

(18.8

)

14,721

 

16,365

 

(10.0

)

 

2,887

 

 

1,721

 

4,325

 

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs

 

120

 

160

 

(25.0

)

363

 

504

 

(28.0

)

Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired

 

10

 

 

87

 

119

 

Other operating expenses

 

48,357

 

37,313

 

29.6

 

132,447

 

115,918

 

14.3

 

 

30,618

 

 

16,476

 

37,917

 

Total benefits and expenses

 

53,109

 

43,174

 

23.0

 

147,531

 

132,787

 

11.1

 

 

33,515

 

 

18,284

 

42,361

 

INCOME (LOSS) BEFORE INCOME TAX

 

(29,712

)

(20,370

)

(45.9

)

(77,550

)

(56,262

)

(37.8

)

 

(15,247

)

 

4,575

 

(25,455

)

Less: realized gains (losses) - investments

 

(3,944

)

(2,588

)

 

 

(1,241

)

105

 

 

 

 

(1,930

)

 

4,919

 

(1,401

)

Less: realized gains (losses) - derivatives

 

218

 

74

 

 

 

54

 

(10,574

)

 

 

 

640

 

 

16,318

 

(373

)

OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)

 

$

(25,986

)

$

(17,856

)

(45.5

)

$

(76,363

)

$

(45,793

)

(66.8

)

 

$

(13,957

)

 

$

(16,662

)

$

(23,681

)

 

For The Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of February 1, 2015 to The Three Months Ended September 30, 2013March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

Segment operating income (loss)

Corporate and Other segment operating loss was $26.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to an operating loss of $17.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The change was primarily due to an $11.0 million unfavorable variance in other operating expenses partially offset by a $2.3 million increase in net investment income as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013.

 

Operating revenues

 

Net investment income for the segment increased $2.3Operating revenues of $19.6 million or 11.6%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. The increase in net investment income waswere primarily due to a $7.5$14.5 million favorable variance related to called securities partially offset by lower coreof investment income as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. Net premiums$2.7 million of premium and policy fees, decreased $0.4and $2.4 million or 9.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013of mortgage loan prepayment fees and other income decreased $0.1 million.

97



Table of Contentsparticipation income.

 

Total benefits and expenses

 

Total benefits and expenses increased $9.9of $33.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013,were primarily due to higher$30.6 million of other operating expenses which included corporate overhead expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2014.expenses.

 

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of January 1, 2015 to The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company)

Segment operating income (loss)

Corporate and Other segment operating loss was $76.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to an operating loss of $45.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The change resulted from a $16.5 million unfavorable variance in other operating expenses and a $15.0 million decrease in net investment income as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

 

Operating revenues

 

Net investment income for the segment decreased $15.0Operating revenues of $1.6 million or 21.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as comparedwere primarily due to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, and net premiums$1.3 million of premium and policy fees decreased $1.2and $0.3 million or 8.7%. The decrease inof net investment income is primarily due to lower core investment income and a $2.0 million unfavorable variance related to mortgage loan prepayment fee income as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Partially offsetting these decreases was a $5.5 million favorable variance related to called securities and a $1.8 million increase related to a portfolioincome.

107



Table of securities designated for trading as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Other income increased $0.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013, primarily due to a $0.3 million favorable variance related to gains generated on the repurchase of non-recourse funding obligations.Contents

 

Total benefits and expenses

 

Total benefits and expenses increased $14.7of $18.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013,was primarily due to higher$16.5 million of other operating expenses which included corporate overhead expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.and $2.8 million of charitable contributions.

For The Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company)

Operating revenues

Operating revenues of $18.7 million were primarily due to $13.0 million of investment income, $4.4 million of premium and policy fees, and $1.0 million of mortgage loan prepayment fees.

Total benefits and expenses

Total benefits and expenses of $42.4 million were primarily due to $37.9 million of other operating expenses which included corporate overhead expense.

 

98108



Table of Contents

 

CONSOLIDATED INVESTMENTS

 

Certain reclassifications have been made in the previously reported financial statements and accompanying tables to make the prior year amounts comparable to those of the current year. Such reclassifications had no effect on previously reported net income, shareowner’s equity, or the totals reflected in the accompanying tables.

Portfolio Description

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), our investment portfolio was approximately $45.7$47.0 billion. The types of assets in which we may invest are influenced by various state insurance laws which prescribe qualified investment assets. Within the parameters of these laws, we invest in assets giving consideration to such factors as liquidity and capital needs, investment quality, investment return, matching of assets and liabilities, and the overall composition of the investment portfolio by asset type and credit exposure.

 

The following table presents the reported values of our invested assets:

 

 

As of

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

Publicly issued bonds (amortized cost: 2014 - $26,794,449; 2013 - $26,096,769)

 

$

28,981,555

 

63.4

%

$

27,054,793

 

62.0

%

Privately issued bonds (amortized cost: 2014 - $7,822,185; 2013 - $7,916,529)

 

8,336,372

 

18.2

 

8,115,126

 

18.6

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Publicly issued bonds (amortized cost: 2015 Successor Company - $29,928,212; 2014 Predecessor Company - $26,358,248)

 

$

29,468,055

 

62.7

%

 

$

28,835,015

 

63.3

%

Privately issued bonds (amortized cost: 2015 Successor Company - $8,698,000; 2014 Predecessor Company - $7,793,600)

 

8,630,716

 

18.4

 

 

8,356,225

 

18.3

 

Preferred Stock (amortized cost: 2015 Successor Company - $72,704)

 

72,086

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

Fixed maturities

 

37,317,927

 

81.6

 

35,169,919

 

80.6

 

 

38,170,857

 

81.3

 

 

37,191,240

 

81.6

 

Equity securities (cost: 2014 - $746,759; 2013 - $632,652)

 

761,449

 

1.7

 

602,388

 

1.4

 

Equity securities (cost: 2015 Successor Company - $698,958; 2014 Predecessor Company - $735,297)

 

701,283

 

1.5

 

 

756,790

 

1.7

 

Mortgage loans

 

5,232,463

 

11.5

 

5,493,492

 

12.6

 

 

5,589,795

 

11.9

 

 

5,133,780

 

11.3

 

Investment real estate

 

12,033

 

 

16,873

 

 

 

7,435

 

 

 

5,918

 

 

Policy loans

 

1,767,228

 

3.9

 

1,815,744

 

4.2

 

 

1,735,370

 

3.7

 

 

1,758,237

 

3.9

 

Other long-term investments

 

425,944

 

0.9

 

424,481

 

1.0

 

 

574,787

 

1.2

 

 

491,282

 

1.1

 

Short-term investments

 

178,299

 

0.4

 

133,025

 

0.2

 

 

246,622

 

0.4

 

 

246,717

 

0.4

 

Total investments

 

$

45,695,343

 

100.0

%

$

43,655,922

 

100.0

%

 

$

47,026,149

 

100.0

%

 

$

45,583,964

 

100.0

%

 

Included in the preceding table are $2.8$2.9 billion and $2.8 billion of fixed maturities and $75.3$71.5 million and $52.4$95.1 million of short-term investments classified as trading securities as of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), respectively. The trading portfolio includes invested assets of $2.8$2.9 billion and $2.8 billion as of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), respectively, held pursuant to modified coinsurance (“Modco”) arrangements under which the economic risks and benefits of the investments are passed to third party reinsurers. Also included above are $415.0$551.3 million and $365.0$435.0 million of securities classified as held-to-maturity as of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), respectively. The preferred stock shown above as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) is included in the equity securities total as of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

99109



Table of Contents

 

Fixed Maturity Investments

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), our fixed maturity investment holdings were approximately $37.3$38.2 billion. The approximate percentage distribution of our fixed maturity investments by quality rating is as follows:

 

 

 

As of

 

Rating

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

AAA

 

12.5

%

12.5

%

AA

 

7.1

 

7.0

 

A

 

32.3

 

32.2

 

BBB

 

41.5

 

41.7

 

Below investment grade

 

5.5

 

5.6

 

Not rated

 

1.1

 

1.0

 

 

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

 

 

Successor

 

 

Predecessor

 

 

 

Company

 

 

Company

 

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

Rating

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

AAA

 

12.8

%

 

12.3

%

AA

 

7.5

 

 

7.4

 

A

 

32.1

 

 

33.1

 

BBB

 

40.9

 

 

40.9

 

Below investment grade

 

5.2

 

 

5.2

 

Not rated

 

1.5

 

 

1.1

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

100.0

%

 

We use various Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations’ (“NRSRO”) ratings when classifying securities by quality ratings. When the various NRSRO ratings are not consistent for a security, we use the second-highest convention in assigning the rating. When there are no such published ratings, we assign a rating based on the statutory accounting rating system if such ratings are available.

 

We do not have material exposure to financial guarantee insurance companies with respect to our investment portfolio. As of September 30, 2014, based upon amortized cost, $35.5 million of our securities were guaranteed either directly or indirectly by third parties out of a total of $34.3 billion fixed maturity securities held by us (0.1% of total fixed maturity securities).

 

Changes in fair value for our available-for-sale portfolio, net of related DAC, VOBA, and policyholder dividend obligation, are charged or credited directly to shareowner’s equity, net of tax. Declines in fair value that are other-than-temporary are recorded as realized losses in the consolidated condensed statements of income, net of any applicable non-credit component of the loss, which is recorded as an adjustment to other comprehensive income (loss).

 

The distribution of our fixed maturity investments by type is as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

Type

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

Corporate bonds

 

$

28,928.2

 

$

27,275.2

 

Corporate securities

 

$

29,259.3

 

 

$

28,837.8

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities

 

1,733.7

 

1,756.0

 

 

1,863.3

 

 

1,706.4

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

1,327.4

 

1,129.2

 

 

1,352.5

 

 

1,328.4

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

1,120.5

 

1,160.2

 

 

1,095.8

 

 

1,114.0

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

1,818.3

 

1,704.1

 

 

1,895.3

 

 

1,679.3

 

Other government-related securities

 

77.9

 

108.5

 

 

77.5

 

 

77.2

 

States, municipals, and political subdivisions

 

1,896.9

 

1,671.7

 

 

2,003.8

 

 

2,013.1

 

Preferred stock

 

72.1

 

 

 

Other

 

415.0

 

365.0

 

 

551.3

 

 

435.0

 

Total fixed income portfolio

 

$

37,317.9

 

$

35,169.9

 

 

$

38,170.9

 

 

$

37,191.2

 

The preferred stock shown above as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) is included in the equity securities total as of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

Within our fixed maturity investments, we maintain portfolios classified as “available-for-sale”, “trading”, and “held-to-maturity”.  We purchase our available-for-sale investments with the intent to hold to maturity by purchasing investments that match future cash flow needs. However, we may sell any of our available-for-sale and trading

110



Table of Contents

investments to maintain proper matching of assets and liabilities. Accordingly, we classified $34.1$34.8 billion, or 91.3%91.1%, of our fixed maturities as “available-for-sale” as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). These securities are carried at fair value on our consolidated condensed balance sheets.

 

Fixed maturities thatwith respect to which we have both the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as “held-to-maturity”. We classified $415.0$551.3 million, or 1.1%1.4% of our fixed maturities as “held-to-maturity” as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). These securities are carried at amortized cost on our consolidated condensed balance sheets.

100



Table of Contents

 

Trading securities are carried at fair value and changes in fair value are recorded on the income statement as they occur. Our trading portfolio accountsaccounted for $2.8$2.9 billion, or 7.6%7.5%, of our fixed maturities and $75.3$71.5 million of short-term investments as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). Changes in fair value on the Modco trading portfolio, including gains and losses from sales, are passed to the reinsurers through the contractual terms of the reinsurance arrangements. Partially offsetting these amounts are corresponding changes in the fair value of the embedded derivative associated with the underlying reinsurance arrangement. The total Modco trading portfolio fixed maturities by rating is as follows:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

Rating

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

AAA

 

$

446,609

 

$

419,866

 

 

$

528,423

 

 

$

478,632

 

AA

 

270,741

 

266,173

 

 

300,162

 

 

290,255

 

A

 

896,117

 

854,020

 

 

899,048

 

 

910,669

 

BBB

 

893,708

 

924,554

 

 

818,153

 

 

824,143

 

Below investment grade

 

319,453

 

324,453

 

 

317,301

 

 

312,594

 

Total Modco trading fixed maturities

 

$

2,826,628

 

$

2,789,066

 

 

$

2,863,087

 

 

$

2,816,293

 

 

A portion of our bond portfolio is invested in residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”), commercial mortgage-backed securities (“CMBS”), and other asset-backed securities (collectively referred to as asset-backed securities or “ABS”). ABS are securities that are backed by a pool of assets. These holdings as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), were approximately $4.2$4.3 billion. Mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) are constructed from pools of mortgages and may have cash flow volatility as a result of changes in the rate at which prepayments of principal occur with respect to the underlying loans. Excluding limitations on access to lending and other extraordinary economic conditions, prepayments of principal on the underlying loans can be expected to accelerate with decreases in market interest rates and diminish with increases in interest rates.

 

101111



Table of Contents

 

Residential mortgage-backed securities - As of September 30,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), our RMBS portfolio was approximately $1.9 billion. As of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), our RMBS portfolio was approximately $1.7 billion. Sequential securities receive payments in order until each class is paid off. Planned amortization class securities (“PACs”) pay down according to a schedule. Pass through securities receive principal as principal of the underlying mortgages is received.

 

The tables below include a breakdown of these holdings by type and rating as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

Residential

 

 

 

Mortgage-


Backed

 

Type

 

Securities

 

Sequential

 

27.732.1

%

PAC

 

36.934.3

 

Pass Through

 

10.49.1

 

Other

 

25.024.5

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

Residential

 

 

 

Mortgage-Backed

 

Rating

 

Securities

 

AAA

 

64.070.5

%

AA

 

0.1

 

A

 

0.90.5

 

BBB

 

0.40.6

 

Below investment grade

 

34.628.3

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

102112



Table of Contents

 

Alt-A Collateralized Holdings

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we held securities with a fair value of $377.4$344.3 million, or 0.8%0.7% of invested assets, supported by collateral classified as Alt-A. As of December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), we held securities with a fair value of $395.0$351.6 million supported by collateral classified as Alt-A. We included in this classification certain whole loan securities where such securities had underlying mortgages with a high level of limited loan documentation. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), these securities had a fair value of $135.9$127.5 million and an unrealized gainloss of $34.0 million.$0.2 million.

 

The following table includes the percentage of our collateral classified as Alt-A, grouped by rating category, as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

Alt-A

 

Rating

 

Securities

 

A

 

1.31.5

%

BBB

 

0.3

 

Below investment grade

 

98.498.2

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

The following tables categorize the estimated fair value and unrealized gain/(loss) of our mortgage-backed securities collateralized by Alt-A mortgage loans by rating as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

Alt-A Collateralized Holdings

 

 

Estimated Fair Value of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

Estimated Fair Value of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

2010 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating

 

Prior

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

Total

 

 

Prior

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Total

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

A

 

$

5.1

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

5.1

 

 

$

5.0

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

5.0

 

BBB

 

1.2

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

 

1.2

 

 

 

 

 

1.2

 

Below investment grade

 

371.1

 

 

 

 

 

371.1

 

 

338.1

 

 

 

 

 

338.1

 

Total mortgage-backed securities collateralized by Alt-A mortgage loans

 

$

377.4

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

377.4

 

 

$

344.3

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

344.3

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Unrealized Gain (Loss) of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

2010 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating

 

Prior

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

Total

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

A

 

$

0.1

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

0.1

 

BBB

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

Below investment grade

 

44.2

 

 

 

 

 

44.2

 

Total mortgage-backed securities collateralized by Alt-A mortgage loans

 

$

44.4

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

44.4

 

 

 

Estimated Unrealized Gain (Loss) of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

 

2011 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating

 

Prior

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Total

 

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

A

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

BBB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Below investment grade

 

(1.2

)

 

 

 

 

(1.2

)

Total mortgage-backed securities collateralized by Alt-A mortgage loans

 

$

(1.2

)

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

 

$

(1.2

)

 

103113



Table of Contents

 

Sub-prime Collateralized Holdings

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we held securities with a total fair value of $1.8$1.6 million that were supported by collateral classified as sub-prime. As of December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), we held securities with a fair value of $2.0$1.7 million that were supported by collateral classified as sub-prime.sub-prime.

 

Prime Collateralized Holdings

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we had RMBS collateralized by prime mortgage loans (including agency mortgages) with a total fair value of $1.4$1.5 billion, or 3.0%3.2%, of total invested assets. As of December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), we held securities with a fair value of $1.4 billion of RMBS collateralized by prime mortgage loans (including agency mortgages).

 

The following table includes the percentage of our collateral classified as prime, grouped by rating category, as of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

Prime

 

Rating

 

Securities

 

AAA

 

82.086.6

%

AA

 

0.20.1

 

A

 

0.70.3

 

BBB

 

0.40.7

 

Below investment grade

 

16.712.3

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

The following tables categorize the estimated fair value and unrealized gain/(loss) of our mortgage-backed securities collateralized by prime mortgage loans (including agency mortgages) by rating as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

Prime Collateralized Holdings

 

 

Estimated Fair Value of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

Estimated Fair Value of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

2010 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating

 

Prior

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

Total

 

 

Prior

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Total

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

AAA

 

$

509.4

 

$

316.6

 

$

26.9

 

$

152.1

 

$

105.4

 

$

1,110.4

 

 

$

800.5

 

$

27.6

 

$

155.7

 

$

159.5

 

$

170.9

 

$

1,314.2

 

AA

 

0.2

 

 

 

 

2.3

 

2.5

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

2.0

 

 

2.1

 

A

 

9.8

 

 

 

 

 

9.8

 

 

3.9

 

 

 

 

 

3.9

 

BBB

 

5.4

 

 

 

 

 

5.4

 

 

10.5

 

 

 

 

 

10.5

 

Below investment grade

 

226.4

 

 

 

 

 

226.4

 

 

186.7

 

 

 

 

 

186.7

 

Total mortgage-backed securities collateralized by prime mortgage loans

 

$

751.2

 

$

316.6

 

$

26.9

 

$

152.1

 

$

107.7

 

$

1,354.5

 

 

$

1,001.7

 

$

27.6

 

$

155.7

 

$

161.5

 

$

170.9

 

$

1,517.4

 

 

 

 

 

Estimated Unrealized Gain (Loss) of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

2010 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating

 

Prior

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

Total

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

AAA

 

$

24.0

 

$

11.5

 

$

0.1

 

$

0.4

 

$

(0.4

)

$

35.6

 

AA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

BBB

 

0.5

 

 

 

 

 

0.5

 

Below investment grade

 

10.9

 

 

 

 

 

10.9

 

Total mortgage-backed securities collateralized by prime mortgage loans

 

$

35.9

 

$

11.5

 

$

0.1

 

$

0.4

 

$

(0.4

)

$

47.5

 

 

 

Estimated Unrealized Gain (Loss) of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

 

2011 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating

 

Prior

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Total

 

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

AAA

 

$

3.6

 

$

(0.4

)

$

(0.6

)

$

(1.5

)

$

 

$

1.1

 

AA

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

BBB

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Below investment grade

 

(0.1

)

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

Total mortgage-backed securities collateralized by prime mortgage loans

 

$

3.5

 

$

(0.4

)

$

(0.6

)

$

(1.5

)

$

 

$

1.0

 

 

104114



Table of Contents

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities - Our CMBS portfolio consists of commercial mortgage-backed securities issued in securitization transactions. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the CMBS holdings were approximately $1.3$1.4 billion. As of December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), the CMBS holdings were approximately $1.1$1.3 billion.

 

The following table includes the percentages of our CMBS holdings, grouped by rating category, as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

Commercial

 

 

 

Mortgage-Backed

 

Rating

 

Securities

 

AAA

 

70.6

%

AA

 

15.315.6

 

A

 

12.412.2

 

BBB

 

1.71.6

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

The following tables categorize the estimated fair value and unrealized gain/(loss) of our CMBS as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities

 

 

Estimated Fair Value of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

Estimated Fair Value of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

2010 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating

 

Prior

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

Total

 

 

Prior

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Total

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

AAA

 

$

149.8

 

$

211.9

 

$

308.0

 

$

147.9

 

$

119.1

 

$

936.7

 

 

$

323.1

 

$

324.3

 

$

154.2

 

$

149.9

 

$

3.1

 

$

954.6

 

AA

 

32.9

 

38.1

 

42.5

 

29.9

 

59.3

 

202.7

 

 

72.7

 

44.6

 

31.0

 

62.1

 

 

210.4

 

A

 

79.9

 

52.0

 

13.6

 

19.6

 

 

165.1

 

 

129.7

 

14.6

 

20.8

 

 

 

165.1

 

BBB

 

22.9

 

 

 

 

 

22.9

 

 

22.4

 

 

 

 

 

22.4

 

Total commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

$

285.5

 

$

302.0

 

$

364.1

 

$

197.4

 

$

178.4

 

$

1,327.4

 

 

$

547.9

 

$

383.5

 

$

206.0

 

$

212.0

 

$

3.1

 

$

1,352.5

 

 

 

Estimated Unrealized Gain (Loss) of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

Estimated Unrealized Gain (Loss) of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

2010 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating

 

Prior

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

Total

 

 

Prior

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Total

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

AAA

 

$

8.3

 

$

18.9

 

$

2.9

 

$

0.5

 

$

0.4

 

$

31.0

 

 

$

(1.2

)

$

(0.9

)

$

(0.6

)

$

(0.5

)

$

 

$

(3.2

)

AA

 

2.1

 

3.1

 

(1.4

)

(0.3

)

0.2

 

3.7

 

 

(0.4

)

0.2

 

 

(0.9

)

 

(1.1

)

A

 

3.2

 

0.6

 

(0.8

)

(0.8

)

 

2.2

 

 

(0.2

)

(0.2

)

(0.1

)

 

 

(0.5

)

BBB

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

 

0.4

 

 

(0.1

)

 

 

 

 

(0.1

)

Total commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

$

14.0

 

$

22.6

 

$

0.7

 

$

(0.6

)

$

0.6

 

$

37.3

 

 

$

(1.9

)

$

(0.9

)

$

(0.7

)

$

(1.4

)

$

 

$

(4.9

)

 

105115



Table of Contents

Other asset-backed securities — Other asset-backed securities pay down based on cash flow received from the underlying pool of assets, such as receivables on auto loans, student loans, credit cards, etc. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), these holdings were approximately $1.1 billion. As of December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), these holdings were approximately $1.2$1.1 billion.

 

The following table includes the percentages of our other asset-backed holdings, grouped by rating category, as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

 

 

Percentage of

 

 

 

Other Asset-

 

 

 

Backed

 

Rating

 

Securities

 

AAA

 

51.353.0

%

AA

 

19.019.4

 

A

 

17.415.4

 

BBB

 

0.60.9

 

Below investment grade

 

11.711.3

 

 

 

100.0

%

 

The following tables categorize the estimated fair value and unrealized gain/(loss) of our asset-backed securities as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

Other Asset-Backed Securities

 

 

Estimated Fair Value of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

Estimated Fair Value of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

2010 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating

 

Prior

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

Total

 

 

Prior

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Total

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

AAA

 

$

490.9

 

$

13.2

 

$

31.8

 

$

19.1

 

$

20.1

 

$

575.1

 

 

$

499.1

 

$

36.7

 

$

19.5

 

$

25.1

 

$

 

$

580.4

 

AA

 

156.2

 

 

56.5

 

 

 

212.7

 

 

156.1

 

56.5

 

 

 

 

212.6

 

A

 

43.5

 

51.5

 

56.0

 

34.5

 

10.0

 

195.5

 

 

74.1

 

48.6

 

36.1

 

10.4

 

 

169.2

 

BBB

 

6.4

 

 

 

 

 

6.4

 

 

10.0

 

 

 

 

 

10.0

 

Below investment grade

 

130.8

 

 

 

 

 

130.8

 

 

123.6

 

 

 

 

 

123.6

 

Total other asset-backed securities

 

$

827.8

 

$

64.7

 

$

144.3

 

$

53.6

 

$

30.1

 

$

1,120.5

 

 

$

862.9

 

$

141.8

 

$

55.6

 

$

35.5

 

$

 

$

1,095.8

 

 

 

Estimated Unrealized Gain (Loss) of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

Estimated Unrealized Gain (Loss) of Security by Year of Security Origination

 

 

2010 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2011 and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rating

 

Prior

 

2011

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

Total

 

 

Prior

 

2012

 

2013

 

2014

 

2015

 

Total

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

AAA

 

$

(16.7

)

$

1.2

 

$

0.5

 

$

0.6

 

$

0.2

 

$

(14.2

)

 

$

(4.7

)

$

(0.7

)

$

(0.7

)

$

(0.4

)

$

 

$

(6.5

)

AA

 

(10.0

)

 

(0.9

)

 

 

(10.9

)

 

1.1

 

0.4

 

 

 

 

1.5

 

A

 

4.0

 

4.6

 

(0.6

)

2.0

 

 

10.0

 

 

(2.7

)

0.2

 

2.3

 

(0.1

)

 

(0.3

)

BBB

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

0.3

 

 

0.1

 

 

 

 

 

0.1

 

Below investment grade

 

12.1

 

 

 

 

 

12.1

 

 

(0.4

)

 

 

 

 

(0.4

)

Total other asset-backed securities

 

$

(10.3

)

$

5.8

 

$

(1.0

)

$

2.6

��

$

0.2

 

$

(2.7

)

 

$

(6.6

)

$

(0.1

)

$

1.6

 

$

(0.5

)

$

 

$

(5.6

)

 

106116



Table of Contents

 

We obtained ratings of our fixed maturities from Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (“Moody’s”), Standard & Poor’s Corporation (“S&P”), and/or Fitch Ratings (“Fitch”). If a fixed maturity is not rated by Moody’s, S&P, or Fitch, we use ratings from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”), or we rate the fixed maturity based upon a comparison of the unrated issue to rated issues of the same issuer or rated issues of other issuers with similar risk characteristics. As of September 30, 2014, 98.9%March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), 98.5% of our fixed maturities were rated by Moody’s, S&P, Fitch, and/or the NAIC.

 

The industry segment composition of our fixed maturity securities is presented in the following table:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

As of

 

% Fair

 

As of

 

% Fair

 

 

As of

 

% Fair

 

 

As of

 

% Fair

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

Value

 

December 31, 2013

 

Value

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

Value

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

Value

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Banking

 

$

2,856,539

 

7.7

%

$

2,663,408

 

7.6

%

 

$

3,354,356

 

8.8

%

 

$

2,931,579

 

7.9

%

Other finance

 

668,845

 

1.8

 

620,051

 

1.8

 

 

459,664

 

1.2

 

 

665,866

 

1.8

 

Electric

 

3,916,855

 

10.5

 

3,752,261

 

10.7

 

 

4,061,013

 

10.6

 

 

4,062,991

 

10.9

 

Natural gas

 

2,717,789

 

7.3

 

2,364,863

 

6.7

 

Energy and natural gas

 

4,699,641

 

12.3

 

 

4,593,251

 

12.4

 

Insurance

 

2,924,930

 

7.8

 

2,631,715

 

7.5

 

 

3,042,119

 

8.0

 

 

2,969,648

 

8.0

 

Energy

 

2,096,618

 

5.6

 

1,946,030

 

5.5

 

Communications

 

1,506,470

 

4.0

 

1,500,544

 

4.3

 

 

1,526,033

 

4.0

 

 

1,504,581

 

4.0

 

Basic industrial

 

1,860,805

 

5.0

 

1,673,188

 

4.8

 

 

1,794,304

 

4.7

 

 

1,763,195

 

4.7

 

Consumer noncyclical

 

3,201,955

 

8.6

 

3,040,080

 

8.6

 

 

3,274,312

 

8.6

 

 

3,247,522

 

8.7

 

Consumer cyclical

 

2,079,825

 

5.6

 

2,140,643

 

6.1

 

 

1,837,203

 

4.8

 

 

1,986,710

 

5.3

 

Finance companies

 

236,142

 

0.6

 

259,925

 

0.7

 

 

186,925

 

0.5

 

 

240,976

 

0.6

 

Capital goods

 

1,352,597

 

3.6

 

1,299,535

 

3.7

 

 

1,434,821

 

3.8

 

 

1,369,912

 

3.7

 

Transportation

 

972,619

 

2.6

 

908,600

 

2.6

 

 

1,023,553

 

2.7

 

 

993,067

 

2.7

 

Other industrial

 

360,121

 

1.0

 

390,766

 

1.1

 

 

311,872

 

0.8

 

 

338,285

 

0.9

 

Brokerage

 

619,523

 

1.7

 

627,630

 

1.8

 

 

579,117

 

1.5

 

 

607,445

 

1.6

 

Technology

 

1,073,399

 

2.9

 

1,007,174

 

2.9

 

 

1,219,866

 

3.2

 

 

1,078,026

 

2.9

 

Real estate

 

250,985

 

0.7

 

269,378

 

0.8

 

 

212,103

 

0.6

 

 

246,712

 

0.7

 

Other utility

 

232,198

 

0.6

 

179,346

 

0.5

 

 

242,278

 

0.6

 

 

238,089

 

0.6

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

1,327,393

 

3.6

 

1,129,226

 

3.2

 

 

1,352,472

 

3.5

 

 

1,328,363

 

3.6

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

1,120,538

 

3.0

 

1,160,238

 

3.3

 

 

1,095,863

 

2.9

 

 

1,113,955

 

3.0

 

Residential mortgage-backed non-agency securities

 

807,126

 

2.2

 

800,154

 

2.3

 

 

892,473

 

2.3

 

 

779,612

 

2.1

 

Residential mortgage-backed agency securities

 

926,575

 

2.5

 

955,791

 

2.7

 

 

970,902

 

2.5

 

 

926,760

 

2.5

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

1,818,321

 

4.9

 

1,704,128

 

4.8

 

 

1,895,277

 

5.0

 

 

1,679,356

 

4.5

 

Other government-related securities

 

77,920

 

0.2

 

108,524

 

0.3

 

 

77,503

 

0.2

 

 

77,204

 

0.2

 

State, municipals, and political divisions

 

1,896,839

 

5.1

 

1,671,721

 

4.8

 

 

2,003,781

 

5.2

 

 

2,013,135

 

5.4

 

Preferred stock

 

72,086

 

0.3

 

 

 

 

Other

 

415,000

 

0.9

 

365,000

 

0.9

 

 

551,320

 

1.4

 

 

435,000

 

1.3

 

Total

 

$

37,317,927

 

100.0

%

$

35,169,919

 

100.0

%

 

$

38,170,857

 

100.0

%

 

$

37,191,240

 

100.0

%

The preferred stock shown above as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) is included in the equity securities total as of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

Our investments classified as available-for-sale and trading in debt and equity securities are reported at fair value. Our investments classified as held-to-maturity are reported at amortized cost. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), our fixed maturity investments (bonds and redeemable preferred stocks) had a marketfair value of $37.3$38.2 billion, which was 8.7% above1.3% below amortized cost of $34.3$38.7 billion. These assets are invested for terms approximately corresponding to anticipated future benefit payments. Thus, market fluctuations are not expected to adversely affect liquidity.

 

MarketFair values for private, non-traded securities are determined as follows: 1) we obtain estimates from independent pricing services and 2) we estimate marketfair value based upon a comparison to quoted issues of the same issuer

117



Table of Contents

or issues of other issuers with similar terms and risk characteristics. We analyze the independent pricing services valuation methodologies and related inputs, including an assessment of the observability of market inputs. Upon obtaining this information related to marketfair value, management makes a determination as to the appropriate valuation amount.

107



Table of Contents

 

Mortgage Loans

 

We invest a portion of our investment portfolio in commercial mortgage loans. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), our mortgage loan holdings were approximately $5.2$5.6 billion. We have specialized in making loans on either credit-oriented commercial properties or credit-anchored strip shopping centers and apartments. Our underwriting procedures relative to our commercial loan portfolio are based, in our view, on a conservative and disciplined approach. We concentrate on a small number of commercial real estate asset types associated with the necessities of life (retail, multi-family, senior living, professional office buildings, and warehouses). We believe that these asset types tend to weather economic downturns better than other commercial asset classes in which it haswe have chosen not to participate. We believe this disciplined approach has helped to maintain a relatively low delinquency and foreclosure rate throughout itsour history. The majority of our mortgage loans portfolio was underwritten and funded by us. From time to time, we may acquire loans in conjunction with an acquisition.

 

Our commercial mortgage loans are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount, and net of valuation allowances. Interest income is accrued on the principal amount of the loan based on the loan’s contractual interest rate. Amortization of premiums and discounts is recorded using the effective yield method. Interest income, amortization of premiums and discounts, and prepayment fees are reported in net investment income.

 

Certain of ourthe mortgage loans have call options or interest rate reset options between 3 and 10 years. However, if interest rates were to significantly increase, we may be unable to exercise the call options or increase the interest rates on our existing mortgage loans commensurate with the significantly increased market rates. Assuming the loans are called at their next call dates, approximately $29.9$168.8 million willwould become due infor the remainder of 2014, $1.1 billion in 2015 through 2019, $510.0(Successor Company), $950.4 million in 2016 through 2020, $381.2 million in 2021 through 2024,2025, and $129.3$119.6 million thereafter.thereafter.

 

We also offer a type of commercial mortgage loan under which we will permit a loan-to-value ratio of up to 85% in exchange for a participating interest in the cash flows from the underlying real estate. As of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), approximately $583.4$536.0 million and $666.6$553.6 million, respectively, of our mortgage loans had this participation feature. Cash flows received as a result of this participation feature are recorded as interest income. During the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), and for the three and nine month periodmonths ended September 30,March 31, 2014 and 2013,(Predecessor Company), we recognized $8.0$1.8 million, $0.1 million, and $13.8$3.0 million and $3.7 million and $12.9 million, respectively, of participating mortgage loan income.income, respectively.

 

We record mortgage loans net of an allowance for credit losses. This allowance is calculated through analysis of specific loans that have indicators of potential impairment based on current information and events. As of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2013,2014 (Predecessor Company), our allowance for mortgage loan credit losses was $3.7$1.2 million and $3.1$5.7 million, respectively. While our mortgage loans do not have quoted market values, as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we estimated the fair value of our mortgage loans to be $5.7$5.6 billion (using discounted cash flows from the next call date), which was approximately 8.9%3.0% greater than the amortized cost, less any related loan loss reserve.

 

At the time of origination, our mortgage lending criteria targets that the loan-to-value ratio on each mortgage is 75% or less. We target projected rental payments from credit anchors (i.e., excluding rental payments from smaller local tenants) of 70% of the property’s projected operating expenses and debt service.

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), approximately $34.0$20.5 million, or 0.07%0.04%, of invested assets consisted of nonperforming, restructured or mortgage loans that were foreclosed and were converted to real estate properties. We do not expect these investments to adversely affect its liquidity or ability to maintain proper matching of assets and liabilities. During the nine months ended September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), we entered into certain mortgage loan transactions occurred that

118



Table of Contents

were accounted for as troubled debt restructurings under Topic 310 of the FASB ASC. For all mortgage loans, the impact of troubled debt restructurings is generally reflected in our investment balance and in the allowance for mortgage loan credit losses. Transactions accounted for as troubled debt restructurings during the quarterperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) included either the acceptance of assets in satisfaction of principal during the respective periods or at a future date, or the recognition of permanent impairments to principal, and were the result of agreements between the creditor and the debtor. During the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we accepted or agreed to accept at a date prior to year end 2014, assets of $11.2 million and $26.3$10.6 million in satisfaction of $14.6$13.2 million of principal and $30.6for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), we accepted or agreed to accept assets of $11.3 million in satisfaction of $13.8 million of principal. WeThese transactions resulted in no material realized losses in our investment in mortgage loans net of existing allowances for mortgage loans losses for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). In the third quarter of 2014, we also identified one $12.6 million loan whose principal of $12.6 million was permanently impaired to a value of $7.3 million. These transactionsThis transaction resulted in arealized losses of $5.3 million and $6.2 milliona decrease in our investment in mortgage loans net of existing allowances for mortgage loans

108



Table of Contents

loan losses. Of the mortgage loan transactions accounted for as troubled debt restructurings, $21.8$13.6 million remain on our balance sheet as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

 

Our mortgage loan portfolio consists of two categories of loans: (1)1) those not subject to a pooling and servicing agreement and (2)2) those subject to a contractual pooling and servicing agreement.agreement. As of September 30, 2014, $34.0March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), $20.5 million of mortgage loans not subject to a pooling and servicing agreement were nonperforming or restructured. $21.8 millionNone of these nonperformingthe restructured loans were restructurednonperforming during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.periods of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), respectively. We did not foreclose on any nonperforming loans not subject to a pooling and servicing agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.periods of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), respectively.

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), none of the loans subject to a pooling and servicing agreement were nonperforming. We did not foreclose on any nonperforming loans subject to pooling and servicing agreement during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.periods of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company).

 

We do not expect these investments to adversely affect our liquidity or ability to maintain proper matching of assets and liabilities.

 

It is our policy to cease to carry accrued interest on loans that are over 90 days delinquent. For loans less than 90 days delinquent, interest is accrued unless it is determined that the accrued interest is not collectible. If a loan becomes over 90 days delinquent, it is our general policy to initiate foreclosure proceedings unless a workout arrangement to bring the loan current is in place. For loans subject to a pooling and servicing agreement, there are certain additional restrictions and/or requirements related to workout proceedings, and as such, these loans may have different attributes and/or circumstances affecting the status of delinquency or categorization of those in nonperforming status.status.

 

119



Table of Contents

Risk Management and Impairment Review

 

We monitor the overall credit quality of our portfolio within established guidelines. The following table includes our available-for-sale fixed maturities by credit rating as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

 

 

 

Percent of

 

 

 

 

Percent of

 

Rating

 

Fair Value

 

Fair Value

 

 

Fair Value

 

Fair Value

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

AAA

 

$

4,225,854

 

12.4

%

 

$

4,358,112

 

12.5

%

AA

 

2,389,486

 

7.0

 

 

2,560,939

 

7.4

 

A

 

11,175,651

 

32.8

 

 

11,357,375

 

32.7

 

BBB

 

14,604,800

 

42.9

 

 

14,798,119

 

42.6

 

Investment grade

 

32,395,791

 

95.1

 

 

33,074,545

 

95.2

 

BB

 

1,074,566

 

3.2

 

 

1,159,358

 

3.3

 

B

 

176,328

 

0.5

 

 

122,531

 

0.4

 

CCC or lower

 

426,471

 

1.2

 

 

400,016

 

1.1

 

Below investment grade

 

1,677,365

 

4.9

 

 

1,681,905

 

4.8

 

Total

 

$

34,073,156

 

100.0

%

 

$

34,756,450

 

100.0

%

 

Not included in the table above are $2.5 billion of investment grade and $322.6$317.3 million of below investment grade fixed maturities classified as trading securities and $415.0$551.3 million of fixed maturities classified as held-to-maturity.

109



Table of Contents

 

Limiting bond exposure to any creditor group is another way we manage credit risk. We held no credit default swaps on the positions listed below as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). The following table summarizes our ten largest maturity exposures to an individual creditor group as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

 

Fair Value of

 

 

 

 

Fair Value of

 

 

 

 

Funded

 

Unfunded

 

Total

 

 

Funded

 

Unfunded

 

Total

 

Creditor

 

Securities

 

Exposures

 

Fair Value

 

 

Securities

 

Exposures

 

Fair Value

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

Federal National Mortgage Association

 

$

215.8

 

$

 

$

215.8

 

Wells Fargo & Co.

 

186.2

 

0.8

 

187.0

 

Berkshire Hathaway Inc.

 

$

214.6

 

$

 

$

214.6

 

 

184.1

 

 

184.1

 

Nextera Energy Inc.

 

177.3

 

 

177.3

 

Duke Energy Corp

 

168.7

 

 

168.7

 

Bank of America Corp.

 

186.7

 

0.3

 

187.0

 

 

167.9

 

0.3

 

168.2

 

Rio Tinto

 

157.3

 

 

157.3

 

Kinder Morgan Inc.

 

156.5

 

 

156.5

 

Federal Home Loan Bank

 

153.2

 

 

153.2

 

General Electric

 

185.0

 

 

185.0

 

 

152.9

 

 

152.9

 

Duke Energy Corp.

 

183.4

 

 

183.4

 

Wells Fargo & Co.

 

178.4

 

 

178.4

 

Comcast Corp.

 

178.2

 

 

178.2

 

Nextera Energy Inc.

 

174.3

 

 

174.3

 

Exelon Corp.

 

172.6

 

 

172.6

 

JP Morgan Chase and Company

 

152.3

 

19.0

 

171.3

 

Rio Tinto PLC

 

162.3

 

 

162.3

 

 

Determining whether a decline in the current fair value of invested assets is an other-than-temporary decline in value is both objective and subjective, and can involve a variety of assumptions and estimates, particularly for investments that are not actively traded in established markets. We review our positions on a monthly basis for possible credit concerns and review our current exposure, credit enhancement, and delinquency experience.

 

Management considers a number of factors when determining the impairment status of individual securities. These include the economic condition of various industry segments and geographic locations and other areas of identified risks. Since it is possible for the impairment of one investment to affect other investments, we engage in ongoing risk management to safeguard against and limit any further risk to our investment portfolio. Special attention is given to correlative risks within specific industries, related parties, and business markets.

 

120



Table of Contents

For certain securitized financial assets with contractual cash flows, including RMBS, CMBS, and other asset-backed securities (collectively referred to as asset-backed securities or “ABS”), GAAP requires us to periodically update our best estimate of cash flows over the life of the security. If the fair value of a securitized financial asset is less than its cost or amortized cost and there has been a decrease in the present value of the expected cash flows since the last revised estimate, considering both timing and amount, an other-than-temporary impairment charge is recognized. Estimating future cash flows is a quantitative and qualitative process that incorporates information received from third party sources along with certain internal assumptions and judgments regarding the future performance of the underlying collateral. Projections of expected future cash flows may change based upon new information regarding the performance of the underlying collateral. In addition, we consider our intent and ability to retain a temporarily depressed security until recovery.recovery.

 

Securities in an unrealized loss position are reviewed at least quarterly to determine if an other-than-temporary impairment is present based on certain quantitative and qualitative factors. We consider a number of factors in determining whether the impairment is other-than-temporary. These include, but are not limited to: 1) actions taken by rating agencies, 2) default by the issuer, 3) the significance of the decline, 4) an assessment of our intent to sell the security (including a more likely than not assessment of whether we will be required to sell the security) before recovering the security’s amortized cost, 5) the duration oftime period during which the decline has occurred, 6) an economic analysis of the issuer’s industry, and 7) the financial strength, liquidity, and recoverability of the issuer. Management performs a security-by-security review each quarter in evaluating the need for any other-than-temporary impairments. Although no set formula is used in this process, the investment performance, collateral position, and continued viability of the issuer are significant measures considered, along with an analysis regarding our expectations for recovery of the security’s entire amortized cost basis through the receipt of future cash flows. Based on our analysis, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we concluded that we did not have any investment securities in an unrealized loss position which would have resulted in an other-than-temporarily impairment. For the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), we concluded that approximately $2.3$0.5 million and $5.4 million, respectively, of investment securities in an unrealized loss position waswere other-than-temporarily impaired, due to credit-related factors, resulting in a charge to earnings. Additionally, we recognized $1.2The $0.5 million and $3.4of credit losses included $0.1 million respectively, of non-credit losses

110



Table of Contents

previously recorded in other comprehensive income (loss) that were recorded in earnings. These non-credit gains were caused by recognizing, in the current quarter, credit losses in earnings that had previously been recognized as non-credit losses in other comprehensive income.

 

There are certain risks and uncertainties associated with determining whether declines in marketfair values are other-than-temporary. These include significant changes in general economic conditions and business markets, trends in certain industry segments, interest rate fluctuations, rating agency actions, changes in significant accounting estimates and assumptions, commission of fraud, and legislative actions. We continuously monitor these factors as they relate to the investment portfolio in determining the status of each investment.

 

During 2014, the energy and natural gas sector experienced increased volatility due to the decline in oil prices. A prolonged decline in oil prices could have a broad economic impact and put financial stress on companies in this sector. We continue to monitor our exposure to companies within and exposed to this sector closely. Our current exposure is predominantly with investment grade securities of companies with ample liquidity to weather a prolonged decline in oil prices. Many of these companies have displayed financial discipline by reducing capital expenditures to conserve cash and maintain their credit ratings. As of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we have determined that no other-than-temporary impairments exist with our current investments within this industry.

We have deposits with certain financial institutions which exceed federally insured limits. We have reviewed the creditworthiness of these financial institutions and believe that there is minimal risk of a material loss.

 

Certain European countries have experienced varying degrees of financial stress. Risks from the continued debt crisis in Europe could continue to disrupt the financial markets, which could have a detrimental impact on global economic conditions and on sovereign and non-sovereign obligations. There remains considerable uncertainty as to future developments in the European debt crisis and the impact on financial markets.markets.

 

121



Table of Contents

The chart shown below includes our non-sovereign fair value exposures in these countries as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). As September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we had no unfunded exposure and had no direct sovereign fair value exposure.exposure.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Gross

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Gross

 

 

Non-sovereign Debt

 

Funded

 

 

Non-sovereign Debt

 

Funded

 

Financial Instrument and Country

 

Financial

 

Non-financial

 

Exposure

 

 

Financial

 

Non-financial

 

Exposure

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

Securities:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

United Kingdom

 

$

537.1

 

$

803.9

 

$

1,341.0

 

 

$

552.4

 

$

822.3

 

$

1,374.7

 

Netherlands

 

158.0

 

203.8

 

361.8

 

 

159.7

 

184.0

 

343.7

 

France

 

104.6

 

236.8

 

341.4

 

 

109.2

 

223.1

 

332.3

 

Switzerland

 

150.3

 

159.3

 

309.6

 

 

166.6

 

162.7

 

329.3

 

Germany

 

97.0

 

135.6

 

232.6

 

 

110.2

 

117.4

 

227.6

 

Spain

 

42.7

 

148.6

 

191.3

 

 

42.4

 

152.7

 

195.1

 

Sweden

 

125.9

 

38.1

 

164.0

 

 

133.5

 

37.5

 

171.0

 

Belgium

 

 

109.9

 

109.9

 

Norway

 

12.4

 

91.5

 

103.9

 

 

12.3

 

96.9

 

109.2

 

Italy

 

 

101.9

 

101.9

 

 

 

105.0

 

105.0

 

Belgium

 

 

89.8

 

89.8

 

Ireland

 

11.5

 

69.9

 

81.4

 

 

12.0

 

68.0

 

80.0

 

Luxembourg

 

 

67.7

 

67.7

 

 

 

65.5

 

65.5

 

Portugal

 

 

15.5

 

15.5

 

 

 

15.9

 

15.9

 

Denmark

 

13.9

 

 

13.9

 

 

13.8

 

 

13.8

 

Total securities

 

1,253.4

 

2,182.5

 

3,435.9

 

 

1,312.1

 

2,140.8

 

3,452.9

 

Derivatives:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Germany

 

35.8

 

 

35.8

 

United Kingdom

 

16.4

 

 

16.4

 

 

24.1

 

 

24.1

 

Germany

 

10.1

 

 

10.1

 

Switzerland

 

8.7

 

 

8.7

 

 

10.6

 

 

10.6

 

France

 

4.2

 

 

4.2

 

Total derivatives

 

35.2

 

 

35.2

 

 

74.7

 

 

74.7

 

Total securities

 

$

1,288.6

 

$

2,182.5

 

$

3,471.1

 

 

$

1,386.8

 

$

2,140.8

 

$

3,527.6

 

 

111122



Table of Contents

 

Realized Gains and Losses

 

The following table sets forth realized investment gains and losses for the periods shown:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

 

 

For The

 

 

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

 

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

September 30,

 

 

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

2014

 

2013

 

Change

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Fixed maturity gains - sales

 

$

22,501

 

$

11,666

 

$

10,835

 

$

50,565

 

$

46,099

 

$

4,466

 

 

$

1,507

 

 

$

6,920

 

$

7,627

 

Fixed maturity losses - sales

 

(257

)

(1,120

)

863

 

(753

)

(3,963

)

3,210

 

 

(1,134

)

 

(29

)

(257

)

Equity gains - sales

 

 

 

 

 

2,367

 

(2,367

)

 

 

 

 

 

Impairments on fixed maturity securities

 

(2,354

)

(7,421

)

5,067

 

(5,405

)

(13,918

)

8,513

 

 

 

 

 

(1,591

)

Impairments on equity securities

 

 

(1,260

)

1,260

 

 

(3,347

)

3,347

 

 

 

 

(481

)

 

Modco trading portfolio

 

(17,225

)

(25,960

)

8,735

 

110,067

 

(167,982

)

278,049

 

 

(33,160

)

 

73,062

 

66,303

 

Other

 

(5,135

)

(3,854

)

(1,281

)

(7,383

)

(10,262

)

2,879

 

 

(2,269

)

 

1,200

 

(1,527

)

Total realized gains (losses) - investments

 

$

(2,470

)

$

(27,949

)

$

25,479

 

$

147,091

 

$

(151,006

)

$

298,097

 

 

$

(35,056

)

 

$

80,672

 

$

70,555

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Derivatives related to variable annuity contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Interest rate futures - VA

 

$

1,979

 

$

(2,255

)

$

4,234

 

$

12,777

 

$

(26,393

)

$

39,170

 

 

$

(48

)

 

$

1,413

 

$

4,250

 

Equity futures - VA

 

861

 

(12,568

)

13,429

 

(9,049

)

(39,829

)

30,780

 

 

(32,469

)

 

9,221

 

(2,651

)

Currency futures - VA

 

10,185

 

(6,531

)

16,716

 

6,020

 

1,440

 

4,580

 

 

6,137

 

 

7,778

 

(1,278

)

Variance swaps - VA

 

1,570

 

(1,347

)

2,917

 

(1,103

)

(9,566

)

8,463

 

 

 

 

 

(1,850

)

Equity options - VA

 

2,050

 

(29,094

)

31,144

 

(31,240

)

(65,631

)

34,391

 

 

(21,774

)

 

3,047

 

(12,341

)

Interest rate swaptions - VA

 

(2,812

)

1,725

 

(4,537

)

(17,213

)

(738

)

(16,475

)

 

(11,328

)

 

9,268

 

(9,403

)

Interest rate swaps - VA

 

22,011

 

(19,224

)

41,235

 

124,548

 

(125,502

)

250,050

 

 

(54,791

)

 

122,710

 

57,368

 

Embedded derivative - GMWB

 

(11,407

)

40,379

 

(51,786

)

(51,869

)

146,693

 

(198,562

)

 

35,870

 

 

(68,503

)

(27,315

)

Funds withheld derivative

 

(2,432

)

32,207

 

(34,639

)

27,298

 

42,045

 

(14,747

)

 

38,236

 

 

(9,073

)

10,699

 

Total derivatives related to variable annuity contracts

 

22,005

 

3,292

 

18,713

 

60,169

 

(77,481

)

137,650

 

 

(40,167

)

 

75,861

 

17,479

 

Derivatives related to FIA contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative - FIA

 

(2,462

)

(104

)

(2,358

)

(9,036

)

(145

)

(8,891

)

 

(2,583

)

 

1,769

 

1,733

 

Equity futures - FIA

 

117

 

(42

)

159

 

1,067

 

(42

)

1,109

 

Equity futures- FIA

 

184

 

 

(184

)

345

 

Volatility futures - FIA

 

(4

)

 

(4

)

4

 

 

4

 

 

4

 

 

 

 

Equity options - FIA

 

1,099

 

104

 

995

 

5,077

 

85

 

4,992

 

Equity options- FIA

 

4,375

 

 

(2,617

)

994

 

Total derivatives related to FIA contracts

 

(1,250

)

(42

)

(1,208

)

(2,888

)

(102

)

(2,786

)

 

1,980

 

 

(1,032

)

3,072

 

Derivatives related to IUL contracts:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Embedded derivative - IUL

 

347

 

 

347

 

62

 

 

62

 

 

257

 

 

(486

)

 

Equity futures - IUL

 

16

 

 

16

 

16

 

 

16

 

Equity Options - IUL

 

(24

)

 

(24

)

(24

)

 

(24

)

Equity futures- IUL

 

14

 

 

3

 

 

Equity options- IUL

 

140

 

 

(115

)

 

Total derivatives related to IUL contracts

 

339

 

 

339

 

54

 

 

54

 

 

411

 

 

(598

)

 

Embedded derivative - Modco reinsurance treaties

 

20,426

 

30,074

 

(9,648

)

(91,945

)

191,847

 

(283,792

)

 

32,191

 

 

(68,026

)

(60,169

)

Interest rate swaps

 

 

72

 

(72

)

 

2,984

 

(2,984

)

Derivatives with PLC(1)

 

398

 

(1,159

)

1,557

 

536

 

(14,689

)

15,225

 

Derivatives with PLC(1)

 

565

 

 

15,863

 

105

 

Other derivatives

 

(149

)

(25

)

(124

)

(351

)

(149

)

(202

)

 

72

 

 

(37

)

(61

)

Total realized gains (losses) - derivatives

 

$

41,769

 

$

32,212

 

$

9,557

 

$

(34,425

)

$

102,410

 

$

(136,835

)

 

$

(4,948

)

 

$

22,031

 

$

(39,574

)

 


(1)These derivatives include the interest support, a yearly renewable term (“YRT”) premium support, and portfolio maintenance agreements between certain of our subsidiaries and PLC.

 

Realized gains and losses on investments reflect portfolio management activities designed to maintain proper matching of assets and liabilities and to enhance long-term investment portfolio performance. The change in net

123



Table of Contents

realized investment gains (losses), excluding impairments and Modco trading portfolio activity during the nine months ended September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), primarily reflects the normal operation of our asset/liability program within the context of

112



Table of Contents

the changing interest rate and spread environment, as well as tax planning strategies designed to utilize capital loss carryforwards.

 

Realized losses are comprised of both write-downs of other-than-temporary impairments and actual sales of investments. For the threeperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we did not recognized any pre-tax other-than-temporary impairments and nine months ended September 30, 2014,for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), we recognized pre-tax other-than-temporary impairments of $2.3$0.5 million and $5.4 million, respectively, due to credit-related factors, resulting in a charge to earnings. Additionally, we recognized $1.2Of the credit losses, $0.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively, ofwere non-credit losses previously recorded in other comprehensive income in earnings as credit losses.income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013,March 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), we recognized pre-tax other-than-temporary impairments of $8.7 million and $17.3 million, respectively.$1.6 million. These other-than-temporary impairments resulted from our analysis of circumstances and our belief that credit events, loss severity, changes in credit enhancement, and/or other adverse conditions of the respective issuers have caused, or will lead to, a deficiency in the contractual cash flows related to these investments. These other-than-temporary impairments, net of Modco recoveries, are presented in the chart below:below:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

For The

 

For The

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

Three Months Ended

 

Nine Months Ended

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

September 30,

 

September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014

 

2013

 

2014

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

Alt-A MBS

 

$

0.8

 

$

1.5

 

$

2.8

 

$

4.5

 

 

$

 

 

$

0.3

 

$

1.0

 

Other MBS

 

0.7

 

1.6

 

1.8

 

5.1

 

 

 

 

0.2

 

0.6

 

Corporate bonds

 

 

4.3

 

 

4.3

 

Corporate securities

 

 

 

 

 

Equities

 

 

1.3

 

 

3.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

Other

 

0.8

 

 

0.8

 

 

Total

 

$

2.3

 

$

8.7

 

$

5.4

 

$

17.3

 

 

$

 

 

$

0.5

 

$

1.6

 

124



Table of Contents

 

As previously discussed, management considers several factors when determining other-than-temporary impairments. Although we purchase securities with the intent to hold them until maturity, we may change our position as a result of a change in circumstances. Any such decision is consistent with our classification of all but a specific portion of our investment portfolio as available-for-sale. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), we sold securities in an unrealized loss position with a fair value of $6.7 million.$20.7 million and $0.4 million, respectively. For such securities, the proceeds, realized loss, and total time period that the security had been in an unrealized loss position are presented in the table below:below for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company):

 

 

 

Proceeds

 

% Proceeds

 

Realized Loss

 

% Realized Loss

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

<= 90 days

 

$

4,077

 

60.6

%

$

(247

)

32.9

%

>90 days but <= 180 days

 

630

 

9.4

 

(99

)

13.1

 

>180 days but <= 270 days

 

210

 

3.1

 

(16

)

2.1

 

>270 days but <= 1 year

 

135

 

2.0

 

(20

)

2.7

 

>1 year

 

1,675

 

24.9

 

(371

)

49.2

 

Total

 

$

6,727

 

100.0

%

$

(753

)

100.0

%

Successor Company

 

 

Proceeds

 

% Proceeds

 

Realized Loss

 

% Realized Loss

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

<= 90 days

 

$

20,682

 

100.0

%

$

(1,134

)

100.0

%

>90 days but <= 180 days

 

 

 

 

 

>180 days but <= 270 days

 

 

 

 

 

>270 days but <= 1 year

 

 

 

 

 

>1 year

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

20,682

 

100.0

%

$

(1,134

)

100.0

%

 

Predecessor Company

 

 

Proceeds

 

% Proceeds

 

Realized Loss

 

% Realized Loss

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

<= 90 days

 

$

87

 

20.1

%

$

(6

)

20.8

%

>90 days but <= 180 days

 

 

 

 

 

>180 days but <= 270 days

 

 

 

 

 

>270 days but <= 1 year

 

4

 

0.9

 

 

1.5

 

>1 year

 

344

 

79.0

 

(23

)

77.7

 

Total

 

$

435

 

100.0

%

$

(29

)

100.0

%

 

For the threeperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and nine months ended September 30, 2014,the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), we sold or otherwise disposed of securities in an unrealized loss position with a fair value (proceeds) of $2.3$20.7 million and $6.7$0.4 million, respectively. The loss realized on the sale of these securities was $0.3$1.1 million and $0.8 million, respectively.for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). We had an immaterial loss for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company). We made the decision to exit these holdings in conjunction with our overall asset liability management process.

 

For the threeperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and nine months ended September 30, 2014,the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), we sold securities in an unrealized gain position with a fair value of $494.0$282.9 million and $1.1 billion,$172.6 million, respectively. The gain realized on the sale of these securities was $22.5$1.5 million and $50.6$6.9 million, respectively.

 

The $5.2$2.3 million of other realized losses recognized for the three months ended September 30, 2014, consistsperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), primarily consisted of an increase in the mortgage loan reserves of $1.0 million, mortgage loan losses of $1.1 million, and partnership losses of $0.1 million.

The $1.2 million of other realized gains recognized for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), primarily consisted of an decrease in the mortgage loan reserves of $0.6$2.3 million, mortgage loan losses of $5.9$1.0 million, and partnership losses of $0.1 million.

For the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), net losses of $33.2 million and net gains of $73.1 million, respectively,

 

113125



Table of Contents

 

gains of $0.1 million. The $7.4 million of other realized losses recognized for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, consists of the increase in the mortgage loan reserves of $0.6 million and mortgage loan losses of $6.8 million.

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, net losses of $17.2 million and net gains of $110.1 million primarily related to changes in fair value on our Modco trading portfolios were included in realized gains and losses, respectively.losses. Of this amount, approximately $4.7$2.2 million of losses and $16.4$1.3 million respectively, of gains, respectively, were realized through the sale of certain securities, which will be reimbursed to our reinsurance partners over time through the reinsurance settlement process for this block of business. The Modco embedded derivative associated with the trading portfolios had realized pre-tax gains of $20.4$32.2 million and pre-tax losses of $91.9$68.0 million, respectively, during the threeperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company). These gains for the three months ended September 30, 2014,losses were due to the credit spreads widening slightly and the nine months ended September 30, 2014 losses were primarily the result of credit spreads modestly retightening and lower treasury yields.

 

Realized investment gains and losses related to derivatives represent changes in their fair value during the period and termination gains/(losses) on those derivatives that were closed during the period.

 

We use equity, interest rate, currency, and volatility futuresvarious derivative instruments to mitigate the riskmanage risks related to certain guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWB, within our VAlife insurance and annuity products. In general,We can use these derivatives as economic hedges against risks inherent in the products. These risks have a direct impact on the cost of such benefits variesthese products and are correlated with the level of equity andmarkets, interest rate markets,rates, foreign currency levels, and overall volatility. The equity futures resulted inhedged risks are recorded through the recognition of embedded derivatives associated with the products. These products include the GMWB rider associated with the variable annuity, fixed indexed annuity products as well as indexed universal life products. During the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), we experienced net pre-taxrealized losses on derivatives related to VA contracts of approximately $40.2 million and net realized gains of  $0.9$75.9 million, respectively. These net losses were impacted by changes in the policyholder behavior assumptions, primarily the lowering of assumed lapses and losses of $9.0 million, interest rate futures resulted in pre-tax gains of $2.0 million and $12.8 million, currency futures resulted in net pre-tax gains of $10.2 million and $6.0 million, and volatility futures resulted in no pre-tax gains or losses forincreased utilization rates, used to value the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. No volatility future positions were held as of September 30, 2014.

We also use equity options, variance swaps, and volatility options to mitigate the risk related to certain guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWB within our VA products. In general, the cost of such benefits varies with the level of equity markets and overall volatility. The equity options resulted in net pre-tax gains of $2.1 million and losses of $31.2 million, the variance swaps resulted in a net pre-tax gain of $1.6 million and a loss of $1.1 million, and the volatility options resulted in no pre-tax gains or losses, respectively, for three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. No volatility options positions were held as of September 30, 2014.

We use interest rate swaps and interest rate swaptions to mitigate the risk related to certain guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWB, within our VA products. The interest rate swaps resulted in net pre-tax gains of $22.0 million and $124.5 million and interest rate swaptions resulted in a net pre-tax loss of $2.8 million and $17.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.embedded derivatives.

 

The GMWB rider embedded derivative on variable deferred annuities, with a GMWB rider, had net realized losses of $11.4 million and $51.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively. The loss was primarily the result of a change in interest rates during 2014.

The Funds Withheld derivative associated with Shades Creek had a pre-tax realized gain of $38.2 million and a loss of $2.4 million and pre-tax gains of $27.3$9.1  million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.

We use certain interest rate swapsperiod of February 1, 2015 to mitigate the price volatility of fixed maturities. These positions resulted in no pre-tax gains or losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. None of these positions were held as of September 30, 2014.

We purchased interest rate caps during 2011, to mitigate our credit risk with respect to our LIBOR exposureMarch 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the potential impactperiod of European financial market distress. These caps resulted in no pre-tax gains or losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. No interest rate caps were held as of September 30, 2014.January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), respectively.

 

Certain of our subsidiaries have derivatives with PLC. These derivatives consist of an interest support agreement, ana YRT premium support agreement, and two portfolio maintenance agreements with PLC. We recognized no pre-tax gain or loss  related to the interest support agreement and a pre-tax gain of $0.6 million related to the YRT premium support agreement for period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). We recognized a pre-tax gain of $15.8 million related to the interest support agreement for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 andan immaterial gains and lossespre-tax gain  related to the YRT premiumspremium support agreement for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company). We entered into two separate portfolio maintenance agreements in October 

114



Table of Contents

2012. We recognized immaterial  losses for the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and pre-tax lossesgains of $0.3 million and $0.2$0.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014,period January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), respectively, related to our portfolio maintenance agreements.

 

We also use various swaps and other types of derivatives to mitigate risk related to other exposures. These contracts generated net pre-tax lossesgains of $0.1 million and $0.4 millionimmaterial losses for the threeperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively.

We recognized pre-tax lossesthe period of $2.5 million and $9.0 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 relatedJanuary 1, 2015 to the embedded derivative on the FIA product. We use certain equity options as well as equity and volatility futures to mitigate certain equity market risks associated with the FIA. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recognized pre-tax gains of $1.2 million and $6.1 million related to these derivatives, respectively.

We recognized pre-tax gains of $0.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 related to the embedded derivative on the indexed universal life (“IUL”) product. We use certain equity options as well as equity futures to mitigate certain equity market risks associated with the IUL.  For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 we recognized immaterial pre-tax losses related to these derivatives.January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company).

 

Unrealized Gains and Losses — Available-for-Sale Securities

 

The information presented below relates to investments at a certain point in time and is not necessarily indicative of the status of the portfolio at any time after September 30, 2014.December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), the balance sheet date. Information about unrealized gains and losses is subject to rapidly changing conditions, including volatility of financial markets and changes in interest rates. Management considers a number of factors in determining if an unrealized loss is other-than-temporary, including the expected cash to be collected and the intent, likelihood, and/or ability to hold the security until recovery. Consistent with our long-standing practice, we do not utilize a “bright line test” to determine other-than-temporary impairments. On a quarterly basis, we perform an analysis on every security with an unrealized loss to determine if an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. This analysis includes reviewing several metrics including collateral, expected cash flows, ratings, and liquidity. Furthermore, since the timing of recognizing realized gains and losses is largely based on management’s decisions as to the timing and selection of investments to be sold, the tables and information provided below should be considered within the context of the overall unrealized gain/(loss) position of the portfolio. We had an overall net unrealized gainloss of $2.7 billion,$525.7 million, prior to tax, DAC, VOBA, and DAC

126



Table of Contents

policyholder dividend obligation offsets, as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), and an overall net unrealized gain of $1.1$3.1 billion as of December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

For fixed maturity and equity securities held that are in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the fair value, amortized cost, unrealized loss, and total time period that the security has been in an unrealized loss position are presented in the table below:below:

 

 

 

Fair

 

% Fair

 

Amortized

 

% Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

% Unrealized

 

 

 

Value

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Cost

 

Loss

 

Loss

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

<= 90 days

 

$

2,961,367

 

55.4

%

$

3,035,428

 

54.6

%

$

(74,061

)

34.8

%

>90 days but <= 180 days

 

37,685

 

0.7

 

39,510

 

0.7

 

(1,825

)

0.9

 

>180 days but <= 270 days

 

35,436

 

0.7

 

36,216

 

0.7

 

(780

)

0.4

 

>270 days but <= 1 year

 

31,346

 

0.6

 

32,747

 

0.6

 

(1,401

)

0.7

 

>1 year but <= 2 years

 

1,588,883

 

29.7

 

1,671,295

 

30.1

 

(82,412

)

38.7

 

>2 years but <= 3 years

 

388,402

 

7.3

 

414,399

 

7.5

 

(25,997

)

12.2

 

>3 years but <= 4 years

 

32,022

 

0.6

 

34,032

 

0.6

 

(2,010

)

0.9

 

>4 years but <= 5 years

 

12,973

 

0.2

 

15,637

 

0.3

 

(2,664

)

1.3

 

>5 years

 

255,339

 

4.8

 

276,952

 

4.9

 

(21,613

)

10.1

 

Total

 

$

5,343,453

 

100.0

%

$

5,556,216

 

100.0

%

$

(212,763

)

100.0

%

115



Table of Contents

 

 

Fair

 

% Fair

 

Amortized

 

% Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

% Unrealized

 

 

 

Value

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Cost

 

Loss

 

Loss

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

<= 90 days

 

$

27,004,751

 

100.0

%

$

27,650,075

 

100.0

%

$

(645,324

)

100.0

%

>90 days but <= 180 days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>180 days but <= 270 days

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>270 days but <= 1 year

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>1 year but <= 2 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>2 years but <= 3 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>3 years but <= 4 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>4 years but <= 5 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>5 years

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

27,004,751

 

100.0

%

$

27,650,075

 

100.0

%

$

(645,324

)

100.0

%

 

The majoritybook value of the unrealized lossour investment portfolio was marked to fair value as of September 30, 2014 for both investment gradeFebruary 1, 2015 (Successor Company), in conjunction with the Dai-ichi Merger which resulted in the elimination of previously unrealized gains and below investment grade securities is attributable to fluctuationslosses from accumulated other comprehensive income. The level of interest rates as of February 1, 2015 (Successor Company) resulted in credit and mortgage spreads for certain securities. The negative impactan increase in the fair value of spread levels for certain securities was partially offset by lower treasury yield levels and the associated positive effect on security prices. However, certain types of securities, including tranches of RMBS and ABS, continue to be priced at a level which has caused theour investments. Since February 1, 2015 (Successor Company) interest rates have increased resulting in net unrealized losses noted above. We believe spread levels on these RMBS and ABS are largely due to uncertainties regarding future performance of the underlying mortgage loans and/or assets.in our investment portfolio.

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Barclays Investment Grade Index was priced at 111.2129.0 bps versus a 10 year average of 165.0167.0 bps. Similarly, the Barclays High Yield Index was priced at 463.9501.0 bps versus a 10 year average of 602.2611.0 bps. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the five, ten, and thirty-year U.S. Treasury obligations were trading at levels of 1.757%1.371%, 2.490%1.924%, and 3.197%2.537%, as compared to 10 year averages of 2.564%2.457%, 3.368%3.262%, and 4.094%3.994%, respectively.

 

As of September 30, 2014, 80.1%March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), 97.4% of the unrealized loss was associated with securities that were rated investment grade. We have examined the performance of the underlying collateral and cash flows and expect that our investments will continue to perform in accordance with their contractual terms. Factors such as credit enhancements within the deal structures and the underlying collateral performance/characteristics support the recoverability of the investments. Based on the factors discussed, we do not consider these unrealized loss positions to be other-than-temporary. However, from time to time, we may sell securities in the ordinary course of managing our portfolio to meet diversification, credit quality, yield enhancement, asset/liability management, and liquidity requirements.

 

Expectations that investments in mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities will continue to perform in accordance with their contractual terms are based on assumptions that a market participant would use in determining the current fair value. It is reasonably possible that the underlying collateral of these investments will perform worse than current market expectations and that such an event may lead to adverse changes in the cash flows on our holdings of these types of securities. This could lead to potential future write-downs within our portfolio of mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities. Expectations that our investments in corporate securities and/or debt obligations will continue to perform in accordance with their contractual terms are based on evidence gathered through our normal credit surveillance process. Although we do not anticipate such events, it is reasonably possible that issuers of our investments in corporate securities will perform worse than current expectations. Such events may lead us to recognize potential future write-downs within our portfolio of corporate securities. It is also possible that such unanticipated events would lead us to dispose of those certain holdings and recognize the effects of any such market movements in our financial statements.

 

127



Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), there were estimated gross unrealized losses of $7.6$1.4 million related to our mortgage-backed securities collateralized by Alt-A mortgage loans. Gross unrealized losses in our securities collateralized by Alt-A residential mortgage loans as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), were primarily the result of continued widening spreads, representing marketplace uncertainty arising from higher defaults in Alt-A residential mortgage loans and rating agency downgrades of securities collateralized by Alt-A residential mortgage loans. As of September 30, 2014, we reviewed the performance of the underlying collateral supporting these securities and determined that the expected cash flows were in line with the valuation. As such, we believe unrealized losses as of September 30, 2014 were temporary in nature.loans.

 

116



Table of Contents

We have no material concentrations of issuers or guarantors of fixed maturity securities. The industry segment composition of all securities in an unrealized loss position held as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) is presented in the following table:table:

 

 

Fair

 

% Fair

 

Amortized

 

% Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

% Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

% Fair

 

Amortized

 

% Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

%
Unrealized

 

 

Value

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Cost

 

Loss

 

Loss

 

 

Value

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Cost

 

Loss

 

Loss

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Banking

 

$

491,912

 

9.2

%

$

514,676

 

9.3

%

$

(22,764

)

10.7

%

 

$

2,272,567

 

8.4

%

$

2,300,045

 

8.3

%

$

(27,478

)

4.3

%

Other finance

 

137,280

 

2.6

 

140,924

 

2.5

 

(3,644

)

1.7

 

 

273,363

 

1.0

 

277,782

 

1.0

 

(4,419

)

0.7

 

Electric

 

170,187

 

3.2

 

174,447

 

3.1

 

(4,260

)

2.0

 

 

3,471,007

 

12.9

 

3,578,360

 

12.9

 

(107,353

)

16.6

 

Natural gas

 

172,506

 

3.2

 

175,175

 

3.2

 

(2,669

)

1.3

 

Energy and natural gas

 

2,802,355

 

10.4

 

2,875,972

 

10.4

 

(73,617

)

11.4

 

Insurance

 

318,327

 

6.0

 

326,396

 

5.9

 

(8,069

)

3.8

 

 

2,507,251

 

9.3

 

2,585,100

 

9.3

 

(77,849

)

12.1

 

Energy

 

231,992

 

4.3

 

241,769

 

4.4

 

(9,777

)

4.6

 

Communications

 

229,853

 

4.3

 

239,186

 

4.3

 

(9,333

)

4.4

 

 

1,194,983

 

4.4

 

1,237,385

 

4.5

 

(42,402

)

6.6

 

Basic industrial

 

322,829

 

6.0

 

345,516

 

6.2

 

(22,687

)

10.7

 

 

1,221,310

 

4.5

 

1,259,121

 

4.6

 

(37,811

)

5.9

 

Consumer noncyclical

 

529,133

 

9.9

 

553,385

 

10.0

 

(24,252

)

11.4

 

 

2,529,411

 

9.4

 

2,599,264

 

9.4

 

(69,853

)

10.8

 

Consumer cyclical

 

263,020

 

4.9

 

272,503

 

4.9

 

(9,483

)

4.5

 

 

1,227,375

 

4.5

 

1,252,283

 

4.5

 

(24,908

)

3.9

 

Finance companies

 

2,460

 

 

2,993

 

0.1

 

(533

)

0.3

 

 

145,980

 

0.5

 

148,453

 

0.5

 

(2,473

)

0.4

 

Capital goods

 

126,972

 

2.4

 

130,816

 

2.4

 

(3,844

)

1.8

 

 

1,075,819

 

4.0

 

1,105,289

 

4.0

 

(29,470

)

4.6

 

Transportation

 

90,972

 

1.7

 

93,772

 

1.7

 

(2,800

)

1.3

 

 

804,093

 

3.0

 

824,005

 

3.0

 

(19,912

)

3.1

 

Other industrial

 

90,602

 

1.7

 

92,936

 

1.7

 

(2,334

)

1.1

 

 

257,726

 

1.0

 

266,775

 

1.0

 

(9,049

)

1.4

 

Brokerage

 

34,903

 

0.7

 

34,982

 

0.6

 

(79

)

 

 

436,922

 

1.6

 

444,617

 

1.6

 

(7,695

)

1.2

 

Technology

 

215,012

 

4.0

 

222,315

 

4.0

 

(7,303

)

3.4

 

 

949,008

 

3.5

 

971,258

 

3.5

 

(22,250

)

3.4

 

Real estate

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

154,345

 

0.6

 

155,762

 

0.6

 

(1,417

)

0.2

 

Other utility

 

4,966

 

0.1

 

4,992

 

0.1

 

(26

)

 

 

177,333

 

0.7

 

183,514

 

0.7

 

(6,181

)

1.0

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

247,821

 

4.6

 

253,684

 

4.6

 

(5,863

)

2.8

 

 

941,676

 

3.5

 

947,107

 

3.4

 

(5,431

)

0.8

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

660,703

 

12.4

 

694,976

 

12.5

 

(34,273

)

16.1

 

 

724,228

 

2.7

 

734,510

 

2.7

 

(10,282

)

1.6

 

Residential mortgage-backed non-agency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

securities

 

199,148

 

3.7

 

210,618

 

3.8

 

(11,470

)

5.4

 

Residential mortgage-backed agency

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

securities

 

37,980

 

0.7

 

40,626

 

0.7

 

(2,646

)

1.2

 

Residential mortgage-backed non-agency securities

 

486,747

 

1.8

 

490,722

 

1.8

 

(3,975

)

0.6

 

Residential mortgage-backed agency securities

 

347,893

 

1.3

 

349,664

 

1.3

 

(1,771

)

0.3

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

723,059

 

13.5

 

745,364

 

13.4

 

(22,305

)

10.5

 

 

1,303,006

 

4.8

 

1,316,982

 

4.8

 

(13,976

)

2.2

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19,204

 

0.1

 

19,516

 

0.1

 

(312

)

 

States, municipals, and political divisions

 

41,816

 

0.9

 

44,165

 

0.6

 

(2,349

)

1.0

 

 

1,650,969

 

6.0

 

1,695,719

 

5.9

 

(44,750

)

6.8

 

Preferred stock

 

30,180

 

0.1

 

30,870

 

0.2

 

(690

)

0.1

 

Total

 

$

5,343,453

 

100.0

%

$

5,556,216

 

100.0

%

$

(212,763

)

100.0

%

 

$

27,004,751

 

100.0

%

$

27,650,075

 

100.0

%

$

(645,324

)

100.0

%

 

117128



Table of Contents

 

The percentage of our unrealized loss positions, segregated by industry segment, is presented in the following table:

 

 

As of

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

September 30, 2014

 

December 31, 2013

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

As of

 

 

As of

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

December 31, 2014

 

��

 

 

 

 

 

 

Banking

 

10.7

%

8.1

%

 

4.3

%

 

9.2

%

Other finance

 

1.7

 

2.3

 

 

0.7

 

 

0.8

 

Electric

 

2.0

 

7.0

 

 

16.6

 

 

0.6

 

Natural gas

 

1.3

 

5.0

 

Energy and natural gas

 

11.4

 

 

22.9

 

Insurance

 

3.8

 

4.2

 

 

12.1

 

 

4.0

 

Energy

 

4.6

 

2.4

 

Communications

 

4.4

 

5.6

 

 

6.6

 

 

2.6

 

Basic industrial

 

10.7

 

5.1

 

 

5.9

 

 

18.4

 

Consumer noncyclical

 

11.4

 

12.1

 

 

10.8

 

 

3.8

 

Consumer cyclical

 

4.5

 

6.1

 

 

3.9

 

 

4.4

 

Finance companies

 

0.3

 

0.2

 

 

0.4

 

 

0.4

 

Capital goods

 

1.8

 

2.8

 

 

4.6

 

 

1.0

 

Transportation

 

1.3

 

2.4

 

 

3.1

 

 

0.1

 

Other industrial

 

1.1

 

1.6

 

 

1.4

 

 

0.6

 

Brokerage

 

 

0.7

 

 

1.2

 

 

0.2

 

Technology

 

3.4

 

3.9

 

 

3.4

 

 

2.8

 

Real estate

 

 

0.6

 

 

0.2

 

 

 

Other utility

 

 

0.7

 

 

1.0

 

 

 

Commercial mortgage-backed securities

 

2.8

 

3.3

 

 

0.8

 

 

1.1

 

Other asset-backed securities

 

16.1

 

11.5

 

 

1.6

 

 

16.8

 

Residential mortgage-backed non-agency securities

 

5.4

 

2.5

 

 

0.6

 

 

5.4

 

Residential mortgage-backed agency securities

 

1.2

 

1.6

 

 

0.3

 

 

0.4

 

U.S. government-related securities

 

10.5

 

8.9

 

 

2.2

 

 

4.3

 

Other government-related securities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

States, municipals, and political divisions

 

1.0

 

1.4

 

 

6.8

 

 

0.2

 

Preferred stock

 

0.1

 

 

 

Total

 

100.0

%

100.0

%

 

100.0

%

 

100.0

%

 

The range of maturity dates for securities in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), varies, with 5.7%13.4% maturing in less than 5 years, 31.6%23.8% maturing between 5 and 10 years, and 62.7%62.8% maturing after 10 years. The following table shows the credit rating of securities in an unrealized loss position as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

S&P or Equivalent

 

Fair

 

% Fair

 

Amortized

 

% Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

% Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

% Fair

 

Amortized

 

% Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

% Unrealized

 

Designation

 

Value

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Cost

 

Loss

 

Loss

 

 

Value

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Cost

 

Loss

 

Loss

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

AAA/AA/A

 

$

2,780,736

 

52.0

%

$

2,882,680

 

51.9

%

$

(101,944

)

47.9

%

 

$

15,428,856

 

57.1

%

$

15,781,498

 

57.1

%

$

(352,642

)

54.5

%

BBB

 

2,060,008

 

38.6

 

2,128,515

 

38.3

 

(68,507

)

32.2

 

 

10,875,116

 

40.3

 

11,152,195

 

40.4

 

(277,079

)

42.9

 

Investment grade

 

4,840,744

 

90.6

 

5,011,195

 

90.2

 

(170,451

)

80.1

 

 

26,303,972

 

97.4

 

26,933,693

 

97.5

 

(629,721

)

97.4

 

BB

 

251,434

 

4.7

 

277,815

 

5.0

 

(26,381

)

12.4

 

 

363,231

 

1.4

 

368,317

 

1.3

 

(5,086

)

1.2

 

B

 

55,485

 

1.0

 

57,302

 

1.0

 

(1,817

)

0.9

 

 

38,922

 

0.1

 

39,656

 

0.1

 

(734

)

0.1

 

CCC or lower

 

195,790

 

3.7

 

209,904

 

3.8

 

(14,114

)

6.6

 

 

298,626

 

1.1

 

308,409

 

1.1

 

(9,783

)

1.3

 

Below investment grade

 

502,709

 

9.4

 

545,021

 

9.8

 

(42,312

)

19.9

 

 

700,779

 

2.6

 

716,382

 

2.5

 

(15,603

)

2.6

 

Total

 

$

5,343,453

 

100.0

%

$

5,556,216

 

100.0

%

$

(212,763

)

100.0

%

 

$

27,004,751

 

100.0

%

$

27,650,075

 

100.0

%

$

(645,324

)

100.0

%

129



Table of Contents

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we held a total of 4712,070 positions that were in an unrealized loss position, includedposition. Included in that amount were 93107 positions of below investment grade securities with a fair value of $502.7$700.8 million that were in an unrealized loss position. Total unrealized losses related to below investment grade securities were $42.3$15.6 million, none of which $29.0 million had been in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve months. Below investment grade securities in an unrealized loss position were 1.1%1.5% of invested assets.

 

118



Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), securities in an unrealized loss position that were rated as below investment grade represented 9.4%2.6% of the total fair value and 19.9%2.6% of the total unrealized loss. We have the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity. After a review of each security and its expected cash flows, we believe the decline in market value to be temporary. We have the ability and intent to hold these securities to maturity. As of September 30, 2014, total unrealized losses for all securities in an unrealized loss position for more than twelve months were $134.7 million. A widening of credit spreads is estimated to account for unrealized losses of $454.1 million, with changes in treasury rates offsetting this loss by an estimated $319.4 million.

 

The majority of our RMBS holdings as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), were super senior or senior bonds in the capital structure. Our total non-agency portfolio has a weighted-average life of 6.297.53 years. The following table categorizes the weighted-average life for our non-agency portfolio, by category of material holdings, as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

 

 

Weighted-Average

 

Non-agency portfolio

 

Life

 

 

 

 

 

Prime

 

7.438.49

 

Alt-A

 

4.585.56

Sub-prime

4.12

 

 

The following table includes the fair value, amortized cost, unrealized loss, and total time period that the security has been in an unrealized loss position for all below investment grade securities as of September 30, 2014:March 31, 2015 (Successor Company):

 

 

Fair

 

% Fair

 

Amortized

 

% Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

% Unrealized

 

 

Fair

 

% Fair

 

Amortized

 

% Amortized

 

Unrealized

 

% Unrealized

 

 

Value

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Cost

 

Loss

 

Loss

 

 

Value

 

Value

 

Cost

 

Cost

 

Loss

 

Loss

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

<= 90 days

 

$

226,693

 

45.1

%

$

237,721

 

43.6

%

$

(11,028

)

26.1

%

 

$

700,779

 

100.0

%

$

716,382

 

100.0

%

$

(15,603

)

100.0

%

>90 days but <= 180 days

 

29,666

 

5.9

 

31,380

 

5.8

 

(1,714

)

4.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>180 days but <= 270 days

 

7,589

 

1.5

 

8,055

 

1.5

 

(466

)

1.1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>270 days but <= 1 year

 

5,457

 

1.1

 

5,597

 

1.0

 

(140

)

0.3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>1 year but <= 2 years

 

95,125

 

18.9

 

106,009

 

19.5

 

(10,884

)

25.7

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>2 years but <= 3 years

 

19,543

 

3.3

 

26,045

 

3.1

 

(6,502

)

1.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>3 years but <= 4 years

 

16,580

 

3.9

 

17,093

 

4.8

 

(513

)

15.4

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>4 years but <= 5 years

 

564

 

0.1

 

637

 

0.1

 

(73

)

0.2

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>5 years

 

101,492

 

20.2

 

112,484

 

20.6

 

(10,992

)

25.9

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total

 

$

502,709

 

100.0

%

$

545,021

 

100.0

%

$

(42,312

)

100.0

%

 

$

700,779

 

100.0

%

$

716,382

 

100.0

%

$

(15,603

)

100.0

%

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

 

Liquidity

 

Liquidity refers to a company’s ability to generate adequate amounts of cash to meet its needs. We meet our liquidity requirements primarily through positive cash flows from our operating subsidiaries. Primary sources of cash from the operating subsidiaries are premiums, deposits for policyholder accounts, investment sales and maturities, and investment income. Primary uses of cash include benefit payments, withdrawals from policyholder accounts, investment purchases, policy acquisition costs, interest payments, and other operating expenses. We believe that we have sufficient liquidity to fund our cash needs under normal operating scenarios.

 

In the event of significant unanticipated cash requirements beyond our normal liquidity needs, we have additional sources of liquidity available depending on market conditions and the amount and timing of the liquidity

130



Table of Contents

need. These additional sources of liquidity include cash flows from operations, the sale of liquid assets, accessing our credit facility, and other sources described herein.

 

Our decision to sell investment assets could be impacted by accounting rules, including rules relating to the likelihood of a requirement to sell securities before recovery of our cost basis. Under stressful market and economic conditions, liquidity may broadly deteriorate, which could negatively impact our ability to sell investment assets. If we require on short notice significant amounts of cash in excess of normal requirements, we may have difficulty selling

119



Table of Contents

investment assets in a timely manner, be forced to sell them for less than we otherwise would have been able to realize, or both.

 

While we anticipate that the cash flows of our operating subsidiaries will be sufficient to meet our investment commitments and operating cash needs in a normal credit market environment, we recognize that investment commitments scheduled to be funded may, from time to time, exceed the funds then available. Therefore, we have established repurchase agreement programs for certain of our insurance subsidiaries to provide liquidity when needed. We expect that the rate received on our investments will equal or exceed our borrowing rate. Under this program, we may, from time to time, sell an investment security at a specific price and agree to repurchase that security at another specified price at a later date. These borrowings are typically for a term less than 90 days. The market value of securities to be repurchased is monitored and collateral levels are adjusted where appropriate to protect the counterparty against credit exposure. TheCash received is invested in fixed maturity securities, and the agreements provideprovided for net settlement in the event of default or on termination of the agreements.agreements. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the fair value of securities pledged under the repurchase program was $402.0$560.2 million and the repurchase obligation of $359.8$510.1 million was included in our consolidated condensed balance sheets (at an average borrowing rate of 815 basis points). During the nine months ended September 30,period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), the maximum balance outstanding at any one point in time related to these programs was $607.6 million and $175.0 million, respectively. The average daily balance was $381.3 million and $77.4 million (at an average borrowing rate of 15 and 16 basis points, respectively) during the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), respectively. As of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), we had a $50.0 million outstanding balance related to such borrowings. During 2014, the maximum balance outstanding at any one point in time related to these programs was $633.7 million. The average daily balance was $511.3 million (at an average borrowing rate of 10 basis points) during the nine months ended September 30, 2014. As of December 31, 2013, we had a $350.0 million outstanding balance related to such borrowings. During 2013, the maximum balance outstanding at any one point in time related to these programs was $815.0 million. The average daily balance was $496.9$470.4 million (at an average borrowing rate of 11 basis points) during the year ended December 31, 2013.2014 (Predecessor Company).

 

Additionally, we may, from time to time, sell short-duration stable value products to complement our cash management practices. Depending on market conditions, we may also use securitization transactions involving our commercial mortgage loans to increase liquidity for the operating subsidiaries.

 

Credit Facility

 

We and PLC have access toUnder a Credit Facilityrevolving line of credit arrangement that provideswas in effect until February 2, 2015 (the “Credit Facility”), we had the ability to borrow on an unsecured basis up to an aggregate principal amount of $750 million. We havehad the right in certain circumstances to request that the commitment under the Credit Facility be increased up to a maximum principal amount of $1.0 billion. Balances outstanding under the Credit Facility accrueaccrued interest at a rate equal to, at the option of the Borrowers, (i) LIBOR plus a spread based on the ratings of PLC’sour senior unsecured long-term debt (“Senior Debt”), or (ii) the sum of (A) a rate equal to the highest of (x) the Administrative Agent’s prime rate, (y) 0.50% above the Federal Funds rate, or (z) the one-month LIBOR plus 1.00% and (B) a spread based on the ratings of PLC’sour Senior Debt. The Credit Facility also providesprovided for a facility fee at a rate, currently 0.175%, that variescould vary with the ratings of PLC’sour Senior Debt and that iswas calculated on the aggregate amount of commitments under the Credit Facility, whether used or unused. The Credit Facility provided that we were liable for the full amount of any obligations for borrowings or letters of credit, including those of the Company, under the Credit Facility. The maturity date onof the Credit Facility iswas July 17, 2017.2017. We were not aware of any non-compliance with the financial debt covenants of the Credit Facility as of September 30, 2014.December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company). We did not have an outstanding balance under the Credit Facility as of September 30, 2014.December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company). PLC had an outstanding balance of $280.0$450.0 million bearing interest at an interesta rate of LIBOR plus 1.20% under the Credit Facility as of September 30, 2014.December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company). As of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company), the Company had used $55.0 million of borrowing capacity by executing a Letter of Credit under the Credit Facility for the benefit of an affiliated captive reinsurance subsidiary of the Company. This Letter of Credit had not been drawn upon as of December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company).

131



Table of Contents

On February 2, 2015, we amended and restated the Credit Facility (the “2015 Credit Facility”). Under the 2015 Credit Facility, we have the ability to borrow on an unsecured basis up to an aggregate principal amount of $1.0 billion. We have the right in certain circumstances to request that the commitment under the 2015 Credit Facility be increased up to a maximum principal amount of $1.25 billion. Balances outstanding under the 2015 Credit Facility accrue interest at a rate equal to, at the option of the Borrowers, (i) LIBOR plus a spread based on the ratings of our Senior Debt, or (ii) the sum of (A) a rate equal to the highest of (x) the Administrative Agent’s prime rate, (y) 0.50% above the Federal Funds rate, or (z) the one-month LIBOR plus 1.00% and (B) a spread based on the ratings of our Senior Debt. The 2015 Credit Facility also provided for a facility fee at a rate that varies with the ratings of our Senior Debt and that is calculated on the aggregate amount of commitments under the 2015 Credit Facility, whether used or unused. The initial facility fee rate was 0.15% on February 2, 2015, and was adjusted to 0.125% upon our subsequent ratings upgrade on February 2, 2015. The 2015 Credit Facility provides that we are liable for the full amount of any obligations for borrowings or letters of credit, including those of the Company, under the 2015 Credit Facility. The maturity date of the 2015 Credit Facility is February 2, 2020. We are not aware of any non-compliance with the financial debt covenants of the Credit Facility as of February 2, 2015 or the 2015 Credit Facility as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). PLC had an outstanding balance of $545.0 million bearing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 1.00% as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). As of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we had used $55.0 million of borrowing capacity by executing a Letter of Credit under the Credit Facility for the benefit of an affiliated captive reinsurance company. This Letter of Credit had not been drawn upon as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

 

Sources and Use of Cash

 

Our primary sources of funding are from our insurance operations and revenues from investments. These sources of cash support our operations and are used to pay dividends to PLC. The states in which we and our insurance subsidiaries are domiciled impose certain restrictions on the ability to pay dividends. These restrictions are based in part on the prior year’s statutory income and/or surplus.

 

We are a member of the FHLB of Cincinnati.Cincinnati and FHLB of New York. FHLB advances provide an attractive funding source for short-term borrowing and for the sale of funding agreements. Membership in the FHLB requires that we purchase FHLB capital stock based on a minimum requirement and a percentage of the dollar amount of advances outstanding. Our borrowing capacity is determined by the following factors: 1) total advance capacity is limited to the lower of 50% of total assets or 100% of mortgage-related assets of Protective Life Insurance Company, our largest insurance subsidiary, 2) ownership of appropriate capital and activity stock to support continued membership in the FHLB and current andcriteria established by each respective bank.

 

120



Table of Contents

future advances, and 3) the availability of adequate eligible mortgage or treasury/agency collateral to back current and future advances.

We held $66.0 million of FHLB common stock as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), which is included in equity securities. In addition, our obligations under the advances must be collateralized. We maintain control over any such pledged assets, including the right of substitution. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we had $771.9$671.8 million of funding agreement-related advances and accrued interest outstanding under the FHLB program.program.

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we reported approximately $614.7$600.1 million (fair value) of Auction Rate Securities (“ARS”) in non-Modco portfolios. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), 100% of these ARS were rated Aaa/AA+. While the auction rate market has experienced liquidity constraints, we believe that based on our current liquidity position and our operating cash flows, any lack of liquidity in the ARS market will not have a material impact on our liquidity, financial condition, or cash flows.

All of the auction rate securities held, For information on a consolidated basis, in non-Modco portfolios as of September 30, 2014, were student loan-backed auction rate securities, for which the underlying collateral is at least 97% guaranteed by the Federal Family Education Loan Program (“FFELP”). As there is no active market for these auction rate securities,how we use a valuation model, which incorporates, among other inputs, the contractual terms of each indenture and current valuation information from actively-traded asset-backed securities with comparable underlying assets (i.e. FFELP-backed student loans) and vintage.

We use an income approach valuation model to determine the fair value of our student loan-backed auction rate securities. Specifically, a discounted cash flow method is used. The expected yield on the auction ratethese securities is estimated for each coupon date, based on the contractual terms on each indenture. The estimated market yield is based on comparable securities with observable yields and an additional yield spread for illiquidityrefer to Note 14, Fair Value of auction rate securities in the current market.

The auction rate securities held in non-Modco portfolios are classified as a Level 2 or Level 3 valuation. An unrealized loss of $27.8 million and $57.2 million was recorded as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, and we have not recorded any other-than-temporary impairment because the underlying collateral for eachFinancial Instruments, of the auction rate securities is at least 97% guaranteed by the FFELP and there are subordinate tranches within each of these auction rate security issuances that would support the senior tranches in the event of default. In the event of a complete and total default by all underlying student loans, the principal shortfall, in excess of the 97% FFELP guarantee, would be absorbed by the subordinate tranches. Our credit exposure is to the FFELP guarantee, not the underlying student loans. At this time, we have no reason to believe that the U.S. Department of Education would not honor the FFELP guarantee, if it were necessary. In addition, we do not intend to sell or expect to be required to sell the securities before recovering our amortized cost of these securities. Therefore, we believe that no other-than-temporary impairment has been experienced.consolidated condensed financial statements.

 

The liquidity requirements of our regulated insurance subsidiaries primarily relate to the liabilities associated with ourtheir various insurance and investment products, operating expenses, and income taxes. Liabilities arising from insurance and investment products include the payment of policyholder benefits, as well as cash payments in connection with policy surrenders and withdrawals, policy loans, and obligations to redeem funding agreements.

 

WeOur insurance subsidiaries maintain investment strategies intended to provide adequate funds to pay benefits and expected surrenders, withdrawals, loans, and redemption obligations without forced sales of investments. In addition, weour insurance subsidiaries hold highly liquid, high-quality short-term investment securities and other liquid

132



Table of Contents

investment grade fixed maturity securities to fund our expected operating expenses, surrenders, and withdrawals. We were committed as of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), to fund mortgage loans in the amount of $407.0$756.2 million.

 

Our positive cash flows from operations are used to fund an investment portfolio that provides for future benefit payments. We employ a formal asset/liability program to manage the cash flows of our investment portfolio relative to our long-term benefit obligations. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we held cash and short-term investments of approximately $388.2$595.2 million.

 

121



Table of Contents

The following chart includes the cash flows provided by or used in operating, investing, and financing activities for the following periods:periods:

 

 

Successor

 

Predecessor

 

 

Company

 

Company

 

 

February 1, 2015

 

 

January 1, 2015

 

For The Three

 

 

For The Nine Months Ended September 30,

 

 

to

 

 

to

 

Months Ended

 

 

2014 

 

2013

 

 

March 31, 2015

 

 

January 31, 2015

 

March 31, 2014

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands) 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 

$

538,090 

 

$

  482,084

 

 

$

103,266

 

 

$

148,060

 

$

18,168

 

Net cash used in investing activities

 

(456,749

)

(687,085

)

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

 

(217,005

)

165,166

 

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities

 

(460,262

)

 

33,475

 

(278,241

)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

 

326,718

 

 

(70,918

)

189,008

 

Total

 

$

(135,664

)

$

(39,835

)

 

$

(30,278

)

 

$

110,617

 

$

(71,065

)

 

For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 as comparedPeriod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and For The Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013Period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company)

 

Net cash provided by operating activities - Cash flows from operating activities are affected by the timing of premiums received, fees received, investment income, and expenses paid. Principal sources of cash include sales of our products and services. We typically generate positive cash flows from operating activities, as premiums and deposits collected from our insurance and investment products exceed benefit payments and redemptions, and we invest the excess. Accordingly, in analyzing our cash flows we focus on the change in the amount of cash available and used in investing activities.

 

Net cash used in(used in) provided by investing activities - Changes in cash from investing activities primarily related to the activity in our investment portfolio.

Net cash provided by (used in) provided by financing activities - Changes in cash from financing activities included $9.8$460.1 million of inflows from repurchase program borrowings for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 as comparedperiod of February 1, 2015 to outflowsMarch 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and $8.5 million of $50.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and $45.8 million outflows of investment product and universal life net activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as comparedperiod of February 1, 2015 to $215.1 million of inflows in the prior year.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). Net issuancesissuance of non-recourse funding obligations equaled $44.0was $20.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as comparedperiod of February 1, 2015 to issuances of $45.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Dividends paid to the Company’s parent equaled $225.0 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to $45.0 million during the nine month period ended September 30, 2013.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company).

 

Changes in cash from financing activities included $70.9 million of outflows of investment product and universal life net activity for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company).

Capital Resources

 

To give us flexibility in connection with future acquisitionsOur primary sources of capital are from retained income from our insurance operations and other funding needs, PLC has debt securities, preferred and common stock, and additional preferred securities of special purpose finance subsidiaries registered under the Securities Act of 1933 on a delayed (or shelf) basis.capital infusions from our parent, PLC. Additionally, we have access to the Credit Facility previously mentioned.

Captive Reinsurance Companies

Golden Gate Captive Insurance Company (“Golden Gate”), a South Carolina special purpose financial captive insurance company and wholly owned subsidiary, had three series of Surplus Notes with a total outstanding balance of $800 million as of September 30, 2014. We hold the entire outstanding balance of Surplus Notes. The Series A1 Surplus Notes have a balance of $400 million and accrue interest at a fixed rate of 7.375%, the Series A2 Surplus Notes have a balance of $100 million and accrue interest at a fixed rate of 8%, and the Series A3 Surplus Notes have a balance of $300 million and accrue interest at a fixed rate of 8.45%.

Golden Gate II Captive Insurance Company (“Golden Gate II”), a South Carolina special purpose financial captive insurance company and wholly owned subsidiary, had $575 million of non-recourse funding obligations outstanding as of September 30, 2014. These outstanding non-recourse funding obligations were issued to special purpose trusts, which in turn issued securities to third parties. Certain of our affiliates own a portion of these securities. As of September 30, 2014, securities related to $176.6 million of the outstanding balance of the non-recourse funding obligations were held by external parties, securities related to $145.3 million of the non-recourse funding obligations were held by nonconsolidated affiliates, and securities related to $253.1 million were held by consolidated subsidiariesdiscussed above.

 

122133



Table of Contents

 

Captive Reinsurance Companies

Our life insurance subsidiaries are subject to a regulation entitled “Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation,” commonly known as “Regulation XXX,” and a supporting guideline entitled “The Application of the Company. TheseValuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation,” commonly known as “Guideline AXXX.” The regulation and supporting guideline require insurers to establish statutory reserves for term and universal life insurance policies with long-term premium guarantees that are consistent with the statutory reserves required for other individual life insurance policies with similar guarantees. Many market participants believe that these levels of reserves are non-economic. We use captive reinsurance companies to implement reinsurance and capital management actions to satisfy these reserve requirements by financing the non-economic reserves either through the issuance of non-recourse funding obligations matureby the captives or obtaining Letters of Credit from third-party financial institutions. For more information regarding our use of captives and their impact on our financial statements, please refer to Note 9, Debt and Other Obligations.

Our captive reinsurance companies assume business from affiliates only. Our captives are capitalized to a level we believe is sufficient to support the contractual risks and other general obligations of the respective captive entity. All of our captive reinsurance companies, with the exception of Shades Creek, are wholly owned subsidiaries and are located domestically. The captive insurance companies are subject to regulations in 2052. $275 millionthe state of domicile.

The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”), through various committees, subgroups and dedicated task forces, is reviewing the use of captives and special purpose vehicles used to transfer insurance risk in relation to existing state laws and regulations, and several committees have adopted or exposed for comment white papers and reports that, if or when implemented, could impose additional requirements on the use of captives and other reinsurers. The Financial Condition (E) Committee of the NAIC recently established a Variable Annuity Issues Working Group to examine company use of variable annuity captives.

The Principles Based Reserving Implementation (EX) Task Force of the NAIC, charged with analysis of the adoption of a principles-based reserving methodology, adopted the “conceptual framework” contained in a report issued by Rector & Associates, Inc., dated June 4, 2014 (as modified or supplemented, the “Rector Report”), that contains numerous recommendations pertaining to the regulation and use of certain captive reinsurers. Certain high-level recommendations have been adopted and assigned to various NAIC working groups, which working groups are in various stages of discussions regarding recommendations. One recommendation of the Rector Report has been adopted as Actuarial Guideline XXXXVIII (“AG48”). AG48 sets more restrictive standards on the permitted collateral utilized to back reserves of a captive. Other recommendations in the Rector Report are subject to ongoing comment and revision. It is unclear at this amount is currently accruing interest attime to what extent the recommendations in the Rector Report, or additional or revised recommendations relating to captive transactions or reinsurance transactions in general, will be adopted by the NAIC. If the recommendations proposed in the Rector Report are implemented, it will likely be difficult for the Company to establish new captive financing arrangements on a ratebasis consistent with past practices. As a result of LIBOR plus 30 basis points. AG48 and the Rector Report, the implementation of new captive structures in the future may be less capital efficient, may lead to lower product returns and/or increased product pricing or result in reduced sales of certain products. Additionally, in some circumstances AG48 and the implementation of the recommendations in the Rector Report could impact the Company’s ability to engage in certain reinsurance transactions with non-affiliates.

We have experienced higher borrowing costs than were originally expectedalso use a captive reinsurance company to reinsure risks associated with $300 millionGMWB and GMDB riders which helps us to manage those risks on an economic basis. In an effort to mitigate the equity market risks relative to our RBC ratio, in the fourth quarter of our non-recourse funding obligations supporting the business reinsured to Golden Gate II. These higher costs are the result of higher spread component of interest expense associated with the illiquidity of the current market for auction rate securities, as well as2012, PLC established a rating downgrade of our guarantor by certain rating agencies. The current rate associated with these obligations is LIBOR plus 200 basis points, which is the maximum rate we can be required to pay under these obligations. We have contingent approval to issue an additional $100 million of obligations. Under the terms of the non-recourse funding obligations, the special purpose trusts, as holders of the non-recourse funding obligations, cannot require repayment from PLC, us, or any of our subsidiaries, other than Golden Gate II, the direct issuer of the non-recourse funding obligations, although PLC has agreed to indemnify Golden Gate II for certain costs and obligations (which obligations do not include payment of principal and interest on the surplus notes). In addition, PLC has entered into certain support agreements with Golden Gate II obligating it to make capital contributions or provide support related to certain of Golden Gate II’s expenses and in certain circumstances, to collateralize certain of PLC’s obligations to Golden Gate II. These support agreements provide that amounts would become payable by PLC to Golden Gate II if its annual general corporate expenses were higher than modeled amounts or if Golden Gate II’s investment income on certain investments or premium income was below certain actuarially determined amounts. As of September 30, 2014, no payments have been made under these agreements

Golden Gate III Vermontwholly owned subsidiary, Shades Creek Captive Insurance Company (“Golden Gate III”Shades Creek”), Vermont specialto which we have reinsured GMWB and GMDB riders related to its VA contracts. The purpose financial insurance company and wholly owned subsidiary,of Shades Creek is to reduce the volatility in RBC due to non-economic variables included within the RBC calculation.

During 2012, PLC entered into an intercompany capital support agreement with Shades Creek. The agreement provides through a guarantee that PLC will contribute assets or purchase surplus notes (or cause an affiliate or third party to a Reimbursement Agreement (the “Reimbursement Agreement”) with UBS AG, Stamford Branch (“UBS”),contribute assets or purchase surplus notes) in amounts necessary for Shades Creek’s regulatory capital levels to equal or exceed minimum thresholds as issuing lender.defined by the agreement. Under the original Reimbursement Agreement, dated April 23, 2010, UBSthis support agreement, PLICO issued a letter$55 million Letter of credit (the “LOC”) in the initial amountCredit on December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company). No borrowings under this Letter of $505 million to a trust for the benefitCredit were outstanding as of West Coast Life Insurance Company (“WCL”)March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). The Reimbursement Agreement was subsequently amended and restated effective November 21, 2011 (the “First Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement”), to replace the existing LOC with one or more letters of credit from UBS, and to extend the maturity date from April 1, 2018, to April 1, 2022. On August 7, 2013, Golden Gate III entered into a Second Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement with UBS (the “Second Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement”),maximum potential future payment amount which amended and restated the First Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. Under the Second and Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement a new LOC in an initial amount of $710 million was issued by UBS in replacement of the existing LOC issuedcould be required under the First Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. The term of the LOC was extended from April 1, 2022 to October 1, 2023, subject to certain conditions being satisfied including scheduled capital contributions being made to Golden Gate III by one of its affiliates. The maximum stated amount of the LOC was increased from $610 million to $720 million in 2015 if certain conditions are met. The maximum stated amount of the LOC was increased from $610 million to $720 million in 2015 if certain conditions are met. On June 25, 2014, we entered into a Third Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement with UBS (the “Third Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement”), which amended and restated the Second Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. Under the Third Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement, a new LOC in an initial amount of $915 million was issued by UBS in replacement of the existing LOC issued under the Second Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. The term of the LOC was extended from October 1, 2023 to April 1, 2025, subject to certain conditions being satisfied including scheduled capital contributions being made to Golden Gate III by one of its affiliates. The maximum stated amount of the LOC was increased from $720 million to $935 million in 2015 if certain conditions are met. The LOC is held in trust for the benefit of WCL, and supports certain obligations of Golden Gate III to WCL under an indemnity reinsurancesupport agreement originally effective April 1, 2010, as amended and restated on November 21, 2011, and as further amended and restated on August 7, 2013 and on June 25, 2014 to include additional blocks of policies, and pursuant to which WCL cedes liabilities relating to the policies of WCL and retrocedes liabilities relating to the policies of the Company. The LOC balance was $925 million as of September 30, 2014. Subject to certain conditions, the amount of the LOC will be periodically increased up to a maximum of $935 million in 2015. The term ofdependent on numerous factors, including the LOC is expected to be approximately 15 years from the original issuance date. This transaction is “non-recourse” to WCL, PLC, and us, meaning that none of these companies other than Golden Gate III are liable for reimbursement on a draw of the LOC. We have entered into certain support agreements with Golden Gate III obligating us to make capital contributions or provide support related to certain of Golden Gate III’s expenses and in certain circumstances, to collateralize certain of our obligations to Golden Gate III. Future scheduled capital contributions amount to approximately $122.5 million and will be paid in three installments with the last payment occurring in 2021, and these contributions may be subject to potential offset against dividend payments as permitted under the terms of the Third Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. The support agreements provide that amounts would become

 

123134



Table of Contents

 

payable by us to Golden Gate III if its annual general corporate expenses were higher than modeled amounts or if specified catastrophic losses occur during defined time periods with respect toperformance of equity markets, the policies reinsured by Golden Gate III. Pursuant to the termslevel of an amendedinterest rates, performance of associated hedges, and restated letter agreement with UBS, the Company has continued to guarantee the payment of fees to UBS as specified in the Third Amended and Restated Reimbursement Agreement. As of September 30, 2014, no payments have been made under these agreements.

Golden Gate IV Vermont Captive Insurance Company (“Golden Gate IV”), a Vermont special purpose financial insurance company and wholly owned subsidiary, is party to a Reimbursement Agreement with UBS AG, Stamford Branch, as issuing lender. Under the Reimbursement Agreement, dated December 10, 2010, UBS issued an LOC in the initial amount of $270 million to a trust for the benefit of WCL. The LOC balance increased, in accordance with the terms of the Reimbursement Agreement, during the third quarter of 2014 and was $740 million as of September 30, 2014. Subject to certain conditions, the amount of the LOC will be periodically increased up to a maximum of $790 million in 2016. The term of the LOC is expected to be 12 years from the original issuance date (stated maturity of December 30, 2022). The LOC was issued to support certain obligations of Golden Gate IV to WCL under an indemnity reinsurance agreement, pursuant to which WCL cedes liabilities related to the policies of WCL and retrocedes liabilities relating to the policies of the Company. This transaction is “non-recourse” to WCL, PLC, and us, meaning that none of these companies other than Golden Gate IV are liable for reimbursement on a draw of the LOC. PLC has entered into certain support agreements with Golden Gate IV obligating PLC to make capital contributions or provide support related to certain of Golden Gate IV’s expenses and in certain circumstances, to collateralize certain of PLC’s obligations to Golden Gate IV. The support agreements provide that amounts would become payable by PLC to Golden Gate IV if its annual general corporate expenses were higher than modeled amounts or if specified catastrophic losses occur during defined time periods with respect to the policies reinsured by Golden Gate IV. PLC has also entered into a separate agreement to guarantee the payments of LOC fees under the terms of the Reimbursement Agreement. As of September 30, 2014, no payments have been made under these agreements.

On October 10, 2012, Golden Gate V Vermont Captive Insurance Company (“Golden Gate V”), a Vermont special purpose financial insurance company, and Red Mountain, LLC (“Red Mountain”), both wholly owned subsidiaries, entered into a 20-year transaction to finance up to $945 million of “AXXX” reserves related to a block of universal life insurance policies with secondary guarantees issued by us and our subsidiary WCL. Golden Gate V issued non-recourse funding obligations to Red Mountain, and Red Mountain issued a note with an initial principal amount of $275 million, increasing to a maximum of $945 million in 2027, to Golden Gate V for deposit to a reinsurance trust supporting Golden Gate V’s obligations under a reinsurance agreement with WCL, pursuant to which WCL cedes liabilities relating to the policies of WCL and retrocedes liabilities relating to the policies of the Company. Through the structure, Hannover Life Reassurance Company of America (“Hannover Re”), the ultimate risk taker in the transaction, provides credit enhancement to the Red Mountain note for the 20-year term in exchange for a fee. The transaction is “non-recourse” to Golden Gate V, Red Mountain, WCL, PLC and us, meaning that none of these companies are liable for the reimbursement of any credit enhancement payments required to be made. As of September 30, 2014, the principal balance of the Red Mountain note was $415 million. In connection with the transaction, PLC has entered into certain support agreements under which PLC guarantees or otherwise supports certain obligations of Golden Gate V or Red Mountain. Future scheduled capital contributions to prefund credit enhancement fees amount to approximately $144.3 million and will be paid in annual installments through 2031. The support agreements provide that amounts would become payable by PLC if Golden Gate V’s annual general corporate expenses were higher than modeled amounts or in the event write-downs due to other-than-temporary impairments on assets held in certain accounts exceed defined threshold levels. Additionally, PLC has entered into separate agreements to indemnify Golden Gate V with respect to material adverse changes in non-guaranteed elements of insurance policies reinsured by Golden Gate V, and to guarantee payment of certain fee amounts in connection with the credit enhancement of the Red Mountain note. As of September 30, 2014, no payments have been made under these agreements.policyholder behavior.

 

A life insurance company’s statutory capital is computed according to rules prescribed by the NAIC, as modified by state law. Generally speaking, other states in which a company does business defer to the interpretation of the domiciliary state with respect to NAIC rules, unless inconsistent with the other state’s regulations. Statutory accounting rules are different from GAAP and are intended to reflect a more conservative view, for example, requiring immediate expensing of policy acquisition costs. The NAIC’s risk-based capital requirements require insurance companies to calculate and report information under a risk-based capital formula. The achievement of long-term growth will require growth in the statutory capital of our insurance subsidiaries. TheWe and our subsidiaries may secure additional

124



Table of Contents

statutory capital through various sources, such as retained statutory earnings or our equity contributions. In general, dividends up to specified levels are considered ordinary and may be paid thirty days after written notice to the insurance commissioner of the state of domicile unless such commissioner objects to the dividend prior to the expiration of such period. Dividends in larger amounts are considered extraordinary and are subject to affirmative prior approval by such commissioner. The maximum amount that would qualify as an ordinary dividend from our insurance subsidiaries in 20142015 is estimated to be $117.8approximately $138.4 million.

In connection with the transaction outlined above, Golden Gate V had a $415 million outstanding non-recourse funding obligation as of September 30, 2014. This non-recourse funding obligation matures in 2037, has scheduled increases in principal to a maximum of $945 million, and accrues interest at a fixed annual rate of 6.25%.

 

State insurance regulators and the NAIC have adopted risk-based capital (“RBC”) requirements for life insurance companies to evaluate the adequacy of statutory capital and surplus in relation to investment and insurance risks. The requirements provide a means of measuring the minimum amount of statutory surplus appropriate for an insurance company to support its overall business operations based on its size and risk profile. A company’s risk-based statutory surplus is calculated by applying factors and performing calculations relating to various asset, premium, claim, expense, and reserve items. Regulators can then measure the adequacy of a company’s statutory surplus by comparing it to the RBC. We manage our capital consumption by using the ratio of our total adjusted capital, as defined by the insurance regulators, to our company action level RBC (known as the RBC ratio), also as defined by insurance regulators.

In an effort to mitigate the equity market risks discussed above relative to our RBC ratio, we have reinsured GMWB and GMDB riders related to our variable annuity contracts to Shades Creek Captive Insurance Company (“Shades Creek”), an affiliate, and wholly owned insurance subsidiary of PLC. The purpose of Shades Creek is to reduce the volatility in RBC due to non-economic variables included within the RBC calculation. PLC has entered into an intercompany capital support agreement with Shades Creek which provides through a guarantee that PLC will contribute assets or purchase surplus notes (or cause an affiliate or third party to contribute assets or purchase surplus notes) in amounts necessary for Shades Creek’s regulatory capital levels to equal or exceed minimum thresholds as defined by the agreement. As of September 30, 2014, Shades Creek maintained capital levels in excess of the required minimum thresholds. The maximum potential future payment amount which could be required under the capital support agreement will be dependent on numerous factors, including the performance of equity markets, the level of interest rates, performance of associated hedges, and related policyholder behavior.

 

Statutory reserves established for VA contracts are sensitive to changes in the equity markets and are affected by the level of account values relative to the level of any guarantees and product design. As a result, the relationship between reserve changes and equity market performance may be non-linear during any given reporting period. Market conditions greatly influence the capital required due to their impact on the valuation of reserves and derivative investments mitigating the risk in these reserves. Risk mitigation activities may result in material and sometimes counterintuitive impacts on statutory surplus and RBC ratio. Notably, as changes in these market and non-market factors occur, both our potential obligation and the related statutory reserves and/or required capital can vary at a non-linear rate.

 

Our statutory surplus is impacted by credit spreads as a result of accounting for the assets and liabilities on our fixed MVA annuities. Statutory separate account assets supporting the fixed MVA annuities are recorded at fair value. In determining the statutory reserve for the fixed MVA annuities, we are required to use current crediting rates based on U.S. Treasuries. In many capital market scenarios, current crediting rates based on U.S. Treasuries are highly correlated with market rates implicit in the fair value of statutory separate account assets. As a result, the change in the statutory reserve from period to period will likely substantially offset the change in the fair value of the statutory separate account assets. However, in periods of volatile credit markets, actual credit spreads on investment assets may increase or decrease sharply for certain sub-sectors of the overall credit market, resulting in statutory separate account asset market value gains or losses. As actual credit spreads are not fully reflected in current crediting rates based on U.S. Treasuries, the calculation of statutory reserves will not substantially offset the change in fair value of the statutory separate account assets resulting in a change in statutory surplus.

We cede material amounts of insurance and transfer related assets to other insurance companies through reinsurance. However, notwithstanding the transfer of related assets, we remain liable with respect to ceded insurance should any reinsurer fail to meet the obligations that it assumed. We evaluate the financial condition of our reinsurers and monitor the associated concentration of credit risk. For the threeperiod of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and nine months ended September 30, 2014,for the period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company), we ceded premiums to unaffiliated third party reinsurers amounting to $283.1$146.8 million and $964.9$91.6 million, respectively. In addition, we had receivables from unaffiliated reinsurers amounting to $5.9$5.5 billion as of September 30, 2014.March 31, 2015 (Successor Company). We review reinsurance receivable amounts for collectability and establish bad debt reserves if deemed appropriate.

 

125135



Table of Contents

 

Ratings

 

Various Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations (“rating organizations”) review the financial performance and condition of insurers, including us and our insurance subsidiaries, and publish their financial strength ratings as indicators of an insurer’s ability to meet policyholder and contract holder obligations. These ratings are important to maintaining public confidence in an insurer’s products, its ability to market its products and its competitive position. The following table summarizes the current financial strength ratings of our significant member companies from the major independent rating organizations as of September 30, 2014:organizations:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Standard
&

 

 

 

Ratings

 

A.M. Best

 

Fitch

 

Poor’s

 

Moody’s

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Insurance company financial strength rating:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Protective Life Insurance Company

 

A+

 

A

 

AA-

 

A2

 

West Coast Life Insurance Company

 

A+

 

A

 

AA-

 

A2

 

Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company

 

A+

 

A

 

AA-

 

 

Lyndon Property Insurance Company

 

A-

 

 

 

 

MONY Life Insurance Company

 

A+

 

A

 

A+

 

A2

 

 

Our ratings are subject to review and change by the rating organizations at any time and without notice. A downgrade or other negative action by a ratings organization with respect to ourthe financial strength ratings or those of ourthe Company’s insurance subsidiaries could adversely affect sales, relationships with distributors, the level of policy surrenders and withdrawals, competitive position in the marketplace, and the cost or availability of reinsurance. With the announcement of the Dai-ichi transaction, each rating agency has undertaken a review of our financial strength ratings and those of our insurance subsidiaries in light of the transaction. The rating agencies may take various actions, positive or negative, with respect to the debt and their actions may not be known until the Merger closes.financial strength ratings of PLC and its subsidiaries, including as a result of PLC’s status as a subsidiary of Dai-ichi Life.

 

On April 28, 2015, Fitch announced a one-notch downgrade of the insurance financial strength ratings of the Company, West Coast Life Insurance Company, Protective Life and Annuity Insurance Company and MONY Life Insurance Company to A from A+ following the downgrade of Japan’s Long-Term Local Currency Issuer Default Rating (IDR) to A from A+.  Fitch stated that such life insurance companies cannot be rated above the sovereign currency rating applicable to their ultimate parent company, Dai-ichi Life, based in Japan. The ratings downgrades announced by Fitch did not trigger any requirements for the Company or its affiliates to post collateral or otherwise negatively impact current obligations.

LIABILITIES

 

Many of our products contain surrender charges and other features that are designed to reward persistency and penalize the early withdrawal of funds. Certain stable value and annuity contracts have market-value adjustments that protect us against investment losses if interest rates are higher at the time of surrender than at the time of issue.

 

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we had policy liabilities and accruals of approximately $31.3$30.8 billion. Our interest-sensitive life insurance policies have a weighted average minimum credited interest rate of approximately 3.51%3.50%.

136



Table of Contents

 

Contractual Obligations

 

We enter into various obligations to third parties in the ordinary course of our operations. However, we do not believe that our cash flow requirements can be assessed solely based upon an analysis of these obligations. The most significant factors affecting our future cash flows are our ability to earn and collect cash from our customers, and the cash flows arising from our investment program. Future cash outflows, whether they are contractual obligations or not, will also vary based upon our future needs. Although some outflows are fixed, others depend on future events. Examples of fixed obligations include our obligations to pay principal and interest on fixed-rate borrowings. Examples of obligations that will vary include obligations to pay interest on variable-rate borrowings and insurance liabilities that depend on future interest rates, market performance, or surrender provisions. Many of our obligations are linked to cash-generating contracts. In addition, our operations involve significant expenditures that are not based upon contractual obligations. These include expenditures for income taxes and payroll.payroll.

 

126



Table of Contents

As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we carried a $118.7$130.3 million liability for uncertain tax positions, including interest on unrecognized tax benefits.positions. These amounts are not included in the long-term contractual obligations table because of the difficulty in making reasonably reliable estimates of the occurrence or timing of cash settlements with the respective taxing authorities.

 

The table below sets forth future maturities of our contractual obligations.

 

 

 

Payments due by period

 

 

 

 

Payments due by period

 

 

 

 

Less than

 

 

 

 

 

More than

 

 

 

 

Less than

 

 

 

 

 

More than

 

 

Total

 

1 year

 

1-3 years

 

3-5 years

 

5 years

 

 

Total

 

1 year

 

1-3 years

 

3-5 years

 

5 years

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

 

 

 

(Dollars In Thousands)

 

Non-recourse funding obligations(1)

 

$

4,549,160

 

$

94,574

 

$

201,907

 

$

215,756

 

$

4,036,923

 

 

$

4,467,255

 

$

96,805

 

$

205,423

 

$

218,851

 

$

3,946,176

 

Stable value products(2)

 

2,333,243

 

856,555

 

938,283

 

463,462

 

74,943

 

 

1,965,555

 

626,418

 

893,968

 

384,509

 

60,660

 

Operating leases(3)

 

17,409

 

6,136

 

7,108

 

2,041

 

2,124

 

 

30,127

 

5,893

 

7,502

 

5,559

 

11,173

 

Home office lease(4)

 

80,206

 

1,226

 

2,455

 

76,525

 

 

 

79,646

 

1,245

 

2,484

 

75,917

 

 

Mortgage loan and investment commitments

 

415,067

 

415,067

 

 

 

 

 

763,787

 

763,787

 

 

 

 

Repurchase program borrowings(5)

 

359,805

 

359,805

 

 

 

 

 

510,125

 

510,125

 

 

 

 

Policyholder obligations(6)

 

42,424,760

 

1,314,007

 

2,931,798

 

3,135,138

 

35,043,817

 

 

41,634,300

 

1,484,628

 

2,983,595

 

3,382,280

 

33,783,797

 

Total

 

$

50,179,650

 

$

3,047,370

 

$

4,081,551

 

$

3,892,922

 

$

39,157,807

 

 

$

49,450,795

 

$

3,488,901

 

$

4,092,972

 

$

4,067,116

 

$

37,801,806

 

 


(1)         Non-recourse funding obligations include all undiscounted principal amounts owed and expected future interest payments due over the term of the notes.  Of the total undiscounted cash flows, $1.9$1.8 billion relates to the Golden Gate V transaction.  These cash outflows are matched and predominantly offset by the cash in flowsinflows Golden Gate V receives from notes issued by a nonconsolidated variable interestvariableinterest entity. Additionally, $2.2 billion of the total undiscounted cash flows are obligations to PLC.  The remaining amounts are associated with the Golden Gate II notes held by third parties as well as certain obligations assumed with the acquisitionsacquisition of MONY Life Insurance Company.

(2)         Anticipated stable value products cash flows including interest.

(3)         Includes all lease payments required under operating lease agreements.

(4)         The lease payments shown assume we exercise our option to purchase the building at the end of the lease term. Additionally, the payments due by the periods above were computed based on the terms of the renegotiated lease agreement, which was entered in December 2013.

(5)         Represents secured borrowings as part of our repurchase program as well as related interest.

(6)         Estimated contractual policyholder obligations are based on mortality, morbidity, and lapse assumptions comparable to our historical experience, modified for recent observed trends. These obligations are based on current balance sheet values and include expected interest crediting, but do not incorporate an expectation of future sales.market growth, or future deposits. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, the amounts presented could materially differ from actual results. Separate account obligations are excluded from the chart asAs variable separate account obligations are legally insulated from general account obligations, andthe variable separate account obligations will be fully funded by cash flows from variable separate account assets. We expect to fully fund the general account obligations from cash flows from general account assets.investments.

 

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

FASB guidance defines fair value for GAAP and establishes a framework for measuring fair value as well as a fair value hierarchy based on the quality of inputs used to measure fair value and enhances disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The term “fair value” in this document is defined in accordance with GAAP. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value. For more information, see Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 15,14, Fair Value of Financial Instruments.

 

Available-for-sale securities and trading account securities are recorded at fair value, which is primarily based on actively traded markets where prices are based on either direct market quotes or observed transactions. Liquidity is a significant factor in the determination of the fair value for these securities. Market price quotes may not be readily available for some positions or for some positions within a market sector where trading activity has slowed significantly or ceased. These situations are generally triggered by the market’s perception of credit uncertainty regarding a single company or a specific market sector. In these instances, fair value is determined based on limited available market information and other factors, principally from reviewing the issuer’s financial position, changes in credit ratings, and

127



Table of Contents

cash flows on the investments. As of September 30, 2014, $2.2 billion of available-for-sale and trading account assets, excluding other long-term investments, were classified as Level 3 fair value assets.

The fair values of derivative assets and liabilities include adjustments for market liquidity, counterparty credit quality, and other deal specific factors, where appropriate. The fair values of derivative assets and liabilities traded in the over-the-counter market are determined using quantitative models that require the use of multiple market inputs including interest rates, prices, and indices to generate continuous yield or pricing curves and volatility factors. The predominance of market inputs are actively quoted and can be validated through external sources. Estimation risk is greater for derivative financial instruments that are either option-based or have longer maturity dates where observable market inputs are less readily available or are unobservable, in which case quantitative based extrapolations of rate, price, or index scenarios are used in determining fair values. As of September 30, 2014, the Level 3 fair values of derivative assets and liabilities determined by these quantitative models were $61.3 million and $420.2 million, respectively.

The liabilities of certain of our annuity account balances are calculated at fair value using actuarial valuation models. These models use various observable and unobservable inputs including projected future cash flows, policyholder behavior, our credit rating, and other market conditions. As of September 30, 2014, the Level 3 fair value of these liabilities was $98.1 million.

For securities that are priced via non-binding independent broker quotations, we assess whether prices received from independent brokers represent a reasonable estimate of fair value through an analysis using internal and external cash flow models developed based on spreads and, when available, market indices. We use a market-based cash flow analysis to validate the reasonableness of prices received from independent brokers. These analytics, which are updated daily, incorporate various metrics (yield curves, credit spreads, prepayment rates, etc.) to determine the valuation of such holdings. As a result of this analysis, if we determine there is a more appropriate fair value based upon the analytics, the price received from the independent broker is adjusted accordingly. We did not adjust any quotes or prices received from brokers during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Of our $2.3 billion, or 4.4%, of total assets (measured at fair value on a recurring basis) classified as Level 3 assets, $736.1 million were ABS. Of this amount, $574.1 million were student loan related ABS and $162.0 million were non-student loan related ABS. The years of issuance of the ABS are as follows:

Year of Issuance

 

Amount

 

 

 

(In Millions)

 

2002

 

$

292.4

 

2003

 

96.9

 

2004

 

117.4

 

2006

 

13.1

 

2007

 

93.8

 

2012

 

97.2

 

2013

 

25.3

 

Total

 

$

736.1

 

The ABS was rated as follows: $477.9 million were AAA rated, $162.7 million were AA rated, $92.6 million were A rated, $2.4 million were BBB rated, and $0.5 million were less than investment grade. We do not expect any credit losses on these securities related to student loans since the majority of the underlying collateral of the student loan asset-backed securities is guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Education.

128137



Table of Contents

 

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We have entered into operating leases that do not result in an obligation being recorded on the balance sheet. Refer to Note 10, Commitments and Contingencies, of the consolidated financial statements for more information.

MARKET RISK EXPOSURES AND OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

 

Our financial position and earnings are subject to various market risks including changes in interest rates, the yield curve, spreads between risk-adjusted and risk-free interest rates, foreign currency rates, used vehicle prices, and equity price risks and issuer defaults. We analyze and manage the risks arising from market exposures of financial instruments, as well as other risks, through an integrated asset/liability management process. Our asset/liability management programs and procedures involve the monitoring of asset and liability durations for various product lines; cash flow testing under various interest rate scenarios; and the continuous rebalancing of assets and liabilities with respect to yield, credit and market risk, and cash flow characteristics. These programs also incorporate the use of derivative financial instruments primarily to reduce our exposure to interest rate risk, inflation risk, currency exchange risk, volatility risk, and equity market risk.risk. See Note 16,15, Derivative Financial Instruments to the consolidated condensed financial statements included in this report for additional information on our financial instruments.

 

The primary focus of our asset/liability program is the management of interest rate risk within the insurance operations. This includes monitoring the duration of both investments and insurance liabilities to maintain an appropriate balance between risk and profitability for each product category, and for us as a whole. It is our policy to maintain asset and liability durations within one-halfone year of one another, although, from time to time, a broader interval may be allowed.

 

We are exposed to credit risk within our investment portfolio and through derivative counterparties. Credit risk relates to the uncertainty of an obligor’s continued ability to make timely payments in accordance with the contractual terms of the instrument or contract. We manage credit risk through established investment policies which attempt to address quality of obligors and counterparties, credit concentration limits, diversification requirements, and acceptable risk levels under expected and stressed scenarios. Derivative counterparty credit risk is measured as the amount owed to us, net of collateral held, based upon current market conditions. In addition, we periodically assess exposure related to potential payment obligations between us and our counterparties. We minimize the credit risk in derivative financial instruments by entering into transactions with high quality counterparties, (A-rated or higher at the time we enter into the contract), and we maintain credit support annexes with certain of those counterparties.counterparties.

 

We utilize a risk management strategy that includes the use of derivative financial instruments. Derivative instruments expose us to credit market and basis risk. Such instruments can change materially in value from period-to-period.period- to-period. We minimize our credit risk by entering into transactions with highly rated counterparties. We manage the market and basis risks by establishing and monitoring limits as to the types and degrees of risk that may be undertaken. We monitor our use of derivatives in connection with our overall asset/liability management programs and procedures. In addition, all derivative programs are monitored by our risk management department.department.

 

Derivative instruments that are used as part of our interest rate risk management strategy include interest rate swaps, interest rate futures, interest rate caps, and interest rate options. Our inflation risk management strategy involves the use of swaps that require us to pay a fixed rate and receive a floating rate that is based on changes in the Consumer Price Index (“CPI”).

 

We may use the following types of derivative contracts to mitigate our exposure to certain guaranteed benefits related to variable annuity, fixed indexed annuity, and indexed universal life contracts:

 

·                  Foreign Currency Futures

·                  Variance Swaps

·                  Interest Rate Futures

·                  Equity Options

·                  Equity Futures

·                  Credit Derivatives

138



Table of Contents

·                  Interest Rate Swaps

·                  Interest Rate Swaptions

·                  Volatility Futures

·                  Volatility Options

·                  Funds Withheld Agreement

·                  Total Return Swaps

129



Table of Contents

 

Other Derivatives

 

Certain of our subsidiaries have derivatives with PLC. These derivatives consist of an interest support agreement, a YRT premium support arrangement, and portfolio maintenance agreements with PLC.

 

We have a funds withheld account that consists of various derivative instruments held by us that is used to hedge the GMWB and GMDB riders. The economic performance of derivatives in the funds withheld account is ceded to Shades Creek. The funds withheld account is accounted for as a derivative financial instrument.

 

We believe that our asset/liability management programs and procedures and certain product features provide protection against the effects of changes in interest rates under various scenarios. Additionally, we believe our asset/liability management programs and procedures provide sufficient liquidity to enable us to fulfill our obligation to pay benefits under our various insurance and deposit contracts. However, our asset/liability management programs and procedures incorporate assumptions about the relationship between short-term and long-term interest rates (i.e., the slope of the yield curve), relationships between risk-adjusted and risk-free interest rates, market liquidity, spread movements, implied volatility, policyholder behavior, and other factors, and the effectiveness of our asset/liability management programs and procedures may be negatively affected whenever actual results differ from those assumptions.

In the ordinary course of our commercial mortgage lending operations, we may commit to provide a mortgage loan before the property to be mortgaged has been built or acquired. The mortgage loan commitment is a contractual obligation to fund a mortgage loan when called upon by the borrower. The commitment is not recognized in our financial statements until the commitment is actually funded. The mortgage loan commitment contains terms, including the rate of interest, which may be different than prevailing interest rates. As of September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), we had outstanding mortgage loan commitments of $407.0$756.2 million at an average rate of 4.79%4.5%.

Impact of continued low interest rate environment

 

Significant changes in interest rates expose us to the risk of not realizing anticipated spreads between the interest rate earned on investments and the interest rate credited to in-force policies and contracts. In addition, certain of our insurance and investment products haveguarantee a minimum guaranteed interest rate (“MGIR”). In periods of prolonged low interest rates, the interest spread earned may be negatively impacted to the extent our ability to reduce policyholder crediting rates is limited by the guaranteed minimum credited interest rates. Additionally, those policies without account values may exhibit lower profitability in periods of prolonged low interest rates due to reduced investment income.

 

130139



Table of Contents

 

The table below presents account values by range of current minimum guaranteed interest rates and current crediting rates for our universal life and deferred fixed annuity products:products as of March 31, 2015 (Successor Company) and December 31, 2014 (Predecessor Company):

 

Credited Rate Summary

As of September 30, 2014March 31, 2015 (Successor Company)

 

 

 

 

1-50 bps

 

More than

 

 

 

Minimum Guaranteed Interest Rate

 

At

 

above

 

50 bps

 

 

 

Account Value

 

MGIR

 

MGIR

 

above MGIR

 

Total

 

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

Universal Life Insurance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>2% - 3%

 

$

186

 

$

941

 

$

2,005

 

$

3,132

 

>3% - 4%

 

3,515

 

1,684

 

137

 

5,336

 

>4% - 5%

 

2,049

 

15

 

 

2,064

 

>5% - 6%

 

225

 

 

 

225

 

Subtotal

 

5,975

 

2,640

 

2,142

 

10,757

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Annuities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1%

 

$

564

 

$

186

 

$

285

 

$

1,035

 

>1% - 2%

 

609

 

518

 

207

 

1,334

 

>2% - 3%

 

1,992

 

113

 

539

 

2,644

 

>3% - 4%

 

296

 

 

 

296

 

>4% - 5%

 

303

 

 

 

303

 

Subtotal

 

3,764

 

817

 

1,031

 

5,612

 

Total

 

$

9,739

 

$

3,457

 

$

3,173

 

$

16,369

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of Total

 

59

%

21

%

20

%

100

%

131



Table of Contents

The table below presents account values by range of current minimum guaranteed interest rates and current crediting rates for our universal life and deferred fixed annuity products:

 

 

 

 

1-50 bps

 

More than

 

 

 

Minimum Guaranteed Interest Rate

 

At

 

above

 

50 bps

 

 

 

Account Value

 

MGIR

 

MGIR

 

above MGIR

 

Total

 

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

Universal Life Insurance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>2% - 3%

 

$

189

 

$

974

 

$

2,022

 

$

3,185

 

>3% - 4%

 

3,669

 

1,557

 

89

 

5,315

 

>4% - 5%

 

2,021

 

14

 

 

2,035

 

>5% - 6%

 

222

 

 

 

222

 

Subtotal

 

6,101

 

2,545

 

2,111

 

10,757

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Annuities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1%

 

$

629

 

$

175

 

$

200

 

$

1,004

 

>1% - 2%

 

578

 

522

 

173

 

1,273

 

>2% - 3%

 

1,938

 

448

 

117

 

2,503

 

>3% - 4%

 

292

 

 

 

292

 

>4% - 5%

 

294

 

 

 

294

 

>5% - 6%

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Subtotal

 

3,734

 

1,145

 

490

 

5,369

 

Total

 

$

9,835

 

$

3,690

 

$

2,601

 

$

16,126

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of Total

 

61

%

23

%

16

%

100

%

 

 

Credited Rate Summary

As of December 31, 20132014 (Predecessor Company)

 

 

 

1-50 bps

 

More than

 

 

 

 

 

 

1-50 bps

 

More than

 

 

 

Minimum Guaranteed Interest Rate

 

At

 

above

 

50 bps

 

 

 

 

At

 

above

 

50 bps

 

 

 

Account Value

 

MGIR

 

MGIR

 

above MGIR

 

Total

 

 

MGIR

 

MGIR

 

above MGIR

 

Total

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

 

(Dollars In Millions)

 

Universal Life Insurance

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

>2% - 3%

 

$

43

 

$

1,024

 

$

1,984

 

$

3,051

 

 

$

188

 

$

958

 

$

2,018

 

$

3,164

 

>3% - 4%

 

3,109

 

2,099

 

150

 

5,358

 

 

3,526

 

1,670

 

138

 

5,334

 

>4% - 5%

 

2,110

 

15

 

 

2,125

 

 

2,035

 

15

 

 

2,050

 

>5% - 6%

 

232

 

 

 

232

 

 

224

 

 

 

224

 

Subtotal

 

5,494

 

3,138

 

2,134

 

10,766

 

 

5,973

 

2,643

 

2,156

 

10,772

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fixed Annuities

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1%

 

$

422

 

$

173

 

$

461

 

$

1,056

 

 

$

602

 

$

179

 

$

239

 

$

1,020

 

>1% - 2%

 

612

 

518

 

279

 

1,409

 

 

597

 

516

 

197

 

1,310

 

>2% - 3%

 

1,846

 

308

 

632

 

2,786

 

 

2,005

 

368

 

203

 

2,576

 

>3% - 4%

 

309

 

 

 

309

 

 

297

 

 

 

297

 

>4% - 5%

 

313

 

 

 

313

 

 

295

 

 

 

295

 

>5% - 6%

 

3

 

 

 

3

 

Subtotal

 

3,502

 

999

 

1,372

 

5,873

 

 

3,799

 

1,063

 

639

 

5,501

 

Total

 

$

8,996

 

$

4,137

 

$

3,506

 

$

16,639

 

 

$

9,772

 

$

3,706

 

$

2,795

 

$

16,273

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of Total

 

54

%

25

%

21

%

100

%

 

60

%

23

%

17

%

100

%

140



Table of Contents

 

We are active in mitigating the impact of a continued low interest rate environment through product design, as well as adjusting crediting rates on current in-force policies and contracts. We also manage interest rate and reinvestment risks through our asset/liability management process. Our asset/liability management programs and procedures involve the monitoring of asset and liability durations; cash flow testing under various interest rate scenarios; and the regular rebalancing of assets and liabilities with respect to yield, credit and market risk, and cash flow characteristics. These programs also incorporate the use of derivative financial instruments primarily to reduce our exposure to interest rate risk, inflation risk, currency exchange risk, volatility risk, and equity market risk.

 

IMPACT OF INFLATION

 

Inflation increases the need for life insurance. Many policyholders who once had adequate insurance programs may increase their life insurance coverage to provide the same relative financial benefit and protection. Higher interest rates may result in higher sales of certain of our investment products.

 

The higher interest rates that have traditionally accompanied inflation could also affect our operations. Policy loans increase as policy loan interest rates become relatively more attractive. As interest rates increase, disintermediation of stable value and annuity account balances and individual life policy cash values may increase. The market value of our fixed-rate, long-term investments may decrease, we may be unable to implement fully the interest rate reset and call provisions of our mortgage loans, and our ability to make attractive mortgage loans, including participating mortgage loans, may decrease. In addition, participating mortgage loan income may decrease. The difference between the interest rate earned on investments and the interest rate credited to life insurance and investment products may also be adversely affected by rising interest ratesrates. During the periods covered by this report, we believe inflation has not had a material impact on our business.

 

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

 

See Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the consolidated condensed financial statements for information regarding recently issued accounting standards.

 

132141



Table of Contents

 

Item 3.                     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

 

See Part I, Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, “Executive Summary” and “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors and Cautionary Factors that may Affect Future Results, of this reportReport for market risk disclosures.

 

Item 4.                     Controls and Procedures

(a)                                 Disclosure controls and procedures

 

In order to ensure that the information the Company must disclose in its filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis, the Company’s management, with the participation of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), except as otherwise noted below. Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. It should be noted that any system of controls, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain judgments, including the costs and benefits of controls and the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues, if any, within the Company have been detected.

In conducting our evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2014, the Company has excluded the internal controls relating to the administrative systems and processes being provided by third parties for MONY Life Insurance Company (“MONY”) and the blocks of life and health business reinsured from MONY Life Insurance Company of America (“MLOA Business”). As of September 30, 2014, the Company is in the process of, but has not completed its own evaluation of the design and operation of the internal controls relating to the administrative systems and processes, including those currently being provided by third parties, for MONY and the MLOA business. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, MONY and the MLOA Business represented revenues and pre-tax income of $175.8 million and $569.7 million and $27.4 million and $79.9 million, respectively, of the Company’s consolidated income before income tax.

(b)                             Changes in internal control over financial reporting

 

During the second quarter of 2014,period from February 1, 2015 through March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), the Company began the conversion and integration of administrative processing intoupdated its internal controls over financial reporting forto ensure the MONYaccuracy of information disclosed as a result of the Merger, including but not limited to internal controls over reporting of goodwill and MLOA blocks of business. The conversion tointangible assets. Other than the Company’s operating environment was substantially complete as of September 30, 2014.

Thereupdates mentioned, there have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the nine months ended September 30, 2014,period of January 1, 2015 to January 31, 2015 (Predecessor Company) or the period of February 1, 2015 to March 31, 2015 (Successor Company), that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. The Company’s internal controls exist within a dynamic environment and the Company continually strives to improve its internal controls and procedures to enhance the quality of its financial reporting.

PART II

Item 1A.Risk Factors and Cautionary Factors that may Affect Future Results

 

The operating results of companies in the insurance industry have historically been subject to significant fluctuations. The factors which could affect the Company’s future results include, but are not limited to, general economic conditions and known trends and uncertainties. In addition to other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors and Cautionary Factors that may Affect Future Resultsin the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, and the factors discussed in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors and Cautionary Factors that may Affect Future Results in the Company’s

133



Table of Contents

Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2014 and June 30, 2014,(Successor Company), which could materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition, or future results of operations.

Risks Related to the Proposed Dai-ichi Merger

The Merger is subject to various closing conditions, including regulatory and third party approvals.

As discussed above, on June 3, 2014, PLC entered into the Merger Agreement pursuant to which it would become a wholly owned subsidiary of Dai-ichi. Completion of the Merger is subject to certain closing conditions, including, without limitation, approval of PLC’s shareowners, which approval was received at a Special Meeting of Shareholders held on October 6, 2014, the receipt of required third party consents and regulatory approvals, including those of the Financial Services Agency of Japan and domestic insurance regulators, the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, which waiting period terminated on July 25, 2014, pursuant to a grant of early termination by the Federal Trade Commission, the absence of legal impediments or a material adverse effect with respect to PLC preventing the consummation of the Merger, as well as other conditions to closing as are customary in transactions such as the Merger. A number of the closing conditions are outside of the control of PLC and the Company and we cannot predict with certainty whether all of the required closing conditions will be satisfied or waived or if other uncertainties may arise. In addition, regulators could impose additional requirements or obligations as conditions for their approvals, which may be burdensome. Despite best efforts, PLC may not be able to satisfy the various closing conditions or obtain the necessary waivers or approvals in a timely fashion or at all, in which case the Merger would be prevented or delayed.

Failure to timely complete the Merger could adversely impact our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

There is no assurance that the conditions to the Merger will be satisfied in a timely manner, or that the Merger will occur. A failure to consummate the Merger on a timely basis or at all could result in negative publicity and cause the price of PLC’s common stock to decline, to the extent PLC’s current stock price reflects a market assumption that the Merger will occur. In addition, as a result of the announcement of the Merger Agreement, trading in PLC’s stock has increased substantially. If the Merger is not consummated, the investment goals of PLC’s shareowners may be materially different than those of its shareowners on a pre-Merger announcement basis. For these and other reasons, failure to timely consummate the Merger could adversely impact PLC’s stock price and perceived acquisition value, business, financial condition and results of operations.

The pendency of the Merger and operating restrictions contained in the Merger Agreement could adversely affect our business and operations.

The proposed Merger could cause disruptions to PLC and the Company’s business and business relationships, which could have an adverse impact on PLC and the Company’s results of operations, liquidity and financial condition. For example, management’s attention may be directed to Merger related considerations, current and prospective employees may experience uncertainty about their future roles with PLC and the Company which may adversely affect our ability to retain and hire key personnel, and parties with which PLC and the Company have business relationships, including customers, potential customers and distributors, may experience uncertainty as to the future of such relationships and seek alternative relationships with third parties or seek to alter their present business relationships with us or PLC in a manner that negatively impacts PLC and the Company. In addition, PLC has incurred, and will continue to incur, significant transaction costs in connection with the Merger, and many of these fees and costs are payable regardless of whether the Merger is consummated.

Shareowner litigation against PLC, its directors and/or Dai-ichi could delay or prevent the Merger.

Transactions such as the Merger are often subject to lawsuits by shareowners. To date, multiple purported class action lawsuits have been filed by PLC’s shareowners seeking injunctive relief, including enjoining or rescinding the Merger, an award of unspecified damages, attorneys’ and other fees and costs, and other relief. Conditions to the closing of the Merger require that no laws or legal restraints must have been adopted or in effect, and that no restraining order, injunction or other order, judgment, decision, opinion or decree must have been issued, in each case having the effect of making the Merger illegal or otherwise prohibiting the consummation of the Merger. While one lawsuit filed

134



Table of Contents

in Alabama has been dismissed with prejudice and the parties have reached a Memorandum of Understanding to settle all outstanding claims in the consolidated action pending in the Delaware Court of Chancery, we cannot assure you that other actions will not be filed against PLC or as to the outcome of any pending or similar future lawsuits, including the costs associated with defending the claims or any other liabilities that may be incurred in connection with the litigation or settlement of these lawsuits. If the plaintiffs in any action are successful in obtaining an injunction prohibiting the parties from completing the Merger on the agreed-upon terms, such an injunction may prevent the completion of the Merger in the expected time frame or altogether.

PLC’s debt ratings and the financial strength ratings of PLC and its insurance subsidiaries may be adversely affected by the transactions contemplated by the Merger Agreement.

Following the announcement of the Dai-ichi transaction, the rating agencies have undertaken a review of PLC’s debt ratings and the financial strength ratings of the Company and its subsidiaries. See Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Liquidity and Capital Resources - Ratings, for additional information regarding the rating agencies and our ratings. The rating agencies may take various actions, positive or negative, and the result may not be known until the Merger closes.  Any negative action by a ratings agency could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

General Risk Factors

The Company is exposed to risks related to natural and man-made disasters and catastrophes, diseases, epidemics pandemics, malicious acts, terrorist acts and climate change, which could adversely affect the Company’s operations and results.

While the Company has obtained insurance, implemented risk management and contingency plans, and taken preventive measures and other precautions, no predictions of specific scenarios can be made nor can assurance be given that there are not scenarios that could have an adverse effect on the Company. A natural or man-made disaster or catastrophe, including a severe weather or geological event such as a storm, tornado, fire, flood, or earthquake, disease, epidemic, pandemic, malicious act, terrorist act, or the occurrence of climate change, could cause the Company’s workforce to be unable to engage in operations at one or more of its facilities or result in short or long-term interruptions in the Company’s business operations, any of which could be material to the Company’s operating results for a particular period. In addition, such events could adversely affect the mortality, morbidity, or other experience of the Company or its reinsurers and have a significant negative impact on the Company. In addition, claims arising from the occurrence of such events or conditions could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Such events or conditions could also have an adverse effect on lapses and surrenders of existing policies, as well as sales of new policies. The Company’s risk management efforts and other precautionary plans and activities may not adequately predict the impact on the Company from such events.

In addition, such events or conditions could result in a decrease or halt in economic activity in large geographic areas, adversely affecting the marketing or administration of the Company’s business within such geographic areas and/or the general economic climate, which in turn could have an adverse effect on the Company. Such events or conditions could also result in additional regulation or restrictions on the Company in the conduct of its business. The possible macroeconomic effects of such events or conditions could also adversely affect the Company’s asset portfolio, as well as many other aspects of the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations.

The Company may not realize its anticipated financial results from its acquisitions strategy.

The Company’s acquisitions of companies and acquisitions or coinsurance of blocks of insurance business have increased its earnings in part by allowing the Company to position itself to realize certain operating efficiencies. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will have future suitable opportunities for, or sufficient capital available to fund, such transactions. If our competitors have access to capital on more favorable terms or at a lower cost, our ability to compete for acquisitions may be diminished. In addition, there can be no assurance that the Company will realize the anticipated financial results from such transactions.

The Company may be unable to complete an acquisition transaction. Completion of an acquisition transaction may be more costly or take longer than expected, or may have a different or more costly financing structure than

135



Table of Contents

initially contemplated. In addition, the Company may not be able to complete or manage multiple acquisition transactions at the same time, or the completion of such transactions may be delayed or be more costly than initially contemplated. The Company or other parties to the transaction may be unable to obtain regulatory approvals required to complete an acquisition transaction. If the Company identifies and completes suitable acquisitions, it may not be able to successfully integrate the business in a timely or cost-effective manner. In addition, there may be unforeseen liabilities that arise in connection with businesses or blocks of insurance business that the Company acquires.

Additionally, in connection with its acquisition transactions that involve reinsurance, the Company assumes, or otherwise becomes responsible for, the obligations of policies and other liabilities of other insurers. Any regulatory, legal, financial, or other adverse development affecting the other insurer could also have an adverse effect on the Company.

Risks Related to the Financial Environment

The Company’s investments are subject to market and credit risks. These risks could be heightened during periods of extreme volatility or disruption in financial and credit markets.

The Company’s invested assets and derivative financial instruments are subject to risks of credit defaults and changes in market values. These risks could be heightened during periods of extreme volatility or disruption in the financial and credit markets, including as a result of social or political unrest or instability domestically or abroad. A widening of credit spreads will increase the unrealized losses in the Company’s investment portfolio. The factors affecting the financial and credit markets could lead to other-than-temporary impairments of assets in the Company’s investment portfolio.

The value of the Company’s commercial mortgage loan portfolio depends in part on the financial condition of the tenants occupying the properties that the Company has financed. The value of the Company’s investment portfolio, including its portfolio of government debt obligations, debt obligations of those entities with an express or implied governmental guarantee and debt obligations of other issuers holding a large amount of such obligations, depends in part on the ability of the issuers or guarantors of such debt to maintain their credit ratings and meet their contractual obligations. Factors that may affect the overall default rate on, and market value of, the Company’s invested assets, derivative financial instruments, and mortgage loans include interest rate levels, financial market performance, and general economic conditions as well as particular circumstances affecting the individual tenants, borrowers, issuers and guarantors.

Significant continued financial and credit market volatility, changes in interest rates and credit spreads, credit defaults, real estate values, market illiquidity, declines in equity prices, acts of corporate malfeasance, ratings downgrades of the issuers or guarantors of these investments, and declines in general economic conditions, either alone or in combination, could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows through realized losses, impairments, changes in unrealized loss positions, and increased demands on capital, including obligations to post additional capital and collateral. In addition, market volatility can make it difficult for the Company to value certain of its assets, especially if trading becomes less frequent. Valuations may include assumptions or estimates that may have significant period-to-period changes that could have an adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

Credit market volatility or disruption could adversely impact the Company’s financial condition or results from operations.

Significant volatility or disruption in domestic or foreign credit markets, including as a result of social or political unrest or instability, could have an adverse impact in several ways on either the Company’s financial condition or results from operations. Changes in interest rates and credit spreads could cause market price and cash flow variability in the fixed income instruments in the Company’s investment portfolio. Significant volatility and lack of liquidity in the credit markets could cause issuers of the fixed-income securities in the Company’s investment portfolio to default on either principal or interest payments on these securities. Additionally, market price valuations may not accurately reflect the underlying expected cash flows of securities within the Company’s investment portfolio.

136



Table of Contents

The Company’s statutory surplus is also impacted by widening credit spreads as a result of the accounting for the assets and liabilities on its fixed market value adjusted (“MVA”) annuities. Statutory separate account assets supporting the fixed MVA annuities are recorded at fair value. In determining the statutory reserve for the fixed MVA annuities, the Company is required to use current crediting rates based on U.S. Treasuries. In many capital market scenarios, current crediting rates based on U.S. Treasuries are highly correlated with market rates implicit in the fair value of statutory separate account assets. As a result, the change in the statutory reserve from period to period will likely substantially offset the change in the fair value of the statutory separate account assets. However, in periods of volatile credit markets, actual credit spreads on investment assets may increase sharply for certain sub-sectors of the overall credit market, resulting in statutory separate account asset market value losses. Credit spreads are not consistently fully reflected in crediting rates based on U.S. Treasuries, and the calculation of statutory reserves will not substantially offset the change in fair value of the statutory separate account assets resulting in reductions in statutory surplus. This situation would result in the need to devote significant additional capital to support fixed MVA annuity products.

Volatility or disruption in the credit markets could also impact the Company’s ability to efficiently access financial solutions for purposes of issuing long-term debt for financing purposes, its ability to obtain financial solutions for purposes of supporting certain traditional and universal life insurance products for capital management purposes, or result in an increase in the cost of existing securitization structures.

The ability of the Company to implement financing solutions designed to fund a portion of statutory reserves on both the traditional and universal life blocks of business is dependent upon factors such as the ratings of the Company, the size of the blocks of business affected, the mortality experience of the Company, the credit markets, and other factors. The Company cannot predict the continued availability of such solutions or the form that the market may dictate. To the extent that such financing solutions were desired but are not available, the Company’s financial position could be adversely affected through impacts including, but not limited to, higher borrowing costs, surplus strain, lower sales capacity, and possible reduced earnings expectations.

The Company could be adversely affected by an inability to access FHLB lending.

The Company is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank (the “FHLB”) of Cincinnati, which provides the Company with access to FHLB financial services, including advances that provide an attractive funding source for short-term borrowing and for the sale of funding agreements. In recent years, the Federal Housing Finance Agency (“FHFA”) has released proposed rules, which include revised member participation standards, and advisory bulletins addressing concerns associated with insurance company (as opposed to federally-backed bank) access to FHLB financial services, the state insurance regulatory framework and FHLB creditor status in the event of member insurer insolvency. In response to FHFA actions, FHLB members, the NAIC and trade groups developed model legislation that would enable insurers to access FHLB funding on similar collateral terms as federally insured depository institutions.  While members of the FHLB and NAIC were not able to agree on certain points, legislation based on this model has been introduced in several states and is not being opposed by the NAIC. It is unclear at this time whether or to what extent additional or new legislation or regulatory action regarding continued membership in and access to FHLB financial services will be enacted or adopted. Any developments that limit access to FHLB financial services or eliminate the Company’s eligibility for continued FHLB membership could have a material adverse effect on the Company.

Industry Related Risks

 

The business of the Company is highly regulated and is subject to routine audits, examinations and actions by regulators, law enforcement agencies and self-regulatory organizations.

 

The Company is subject to government regulation in each of the states in which it conducts business. In many instances, the regulatory models emanate from the National Association of Insurance Commissioners (“NAIC”). Such regulation is vested in state agencies having broad administrative and in some instances discretionary power dealing with many aspects of the Company’s business, which may include, among other things, premium rates and increases thereto, underwriting practices, reserve requirements, marketing practices, advertising, privacy, policy forms, reinsurance reserve requirements, insurer use of captive reinsurance companies, acquisitions, mergers, capital adequacy, claims practices and the remittance of unclaimed property. In addition, some state insurance departments

 

137142



Table of Contents

 

may enact rules or regulations with extra-territorial application, effectively extending their jurisdiction to areas such as permitted insurance company investments that are normally the province of an insurance company’s domiciliary state regulator.

 

At any given time, a number of financial, market conduct, or other examinations or audits of the Company’s subsidiaries may be ongoing. It is possible that any examination or audit may result in payments of fines and penalties, payments to customers, or both, as well as changes in systems or procedures, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

The Company’s insurance subsidiaries are required to obtain state regulatory approval for rate increases for certain health insurance products. The Company’s profits may be adversely affected if the requested rate increases are not approved in full by regulators in a timely fashion.

 

State insurance regulators and the NAIC regularly re-examine existing laws and regulations applicable to insurance companies and their products. Changes in these laws and regulations, or in interpretations thereof, are often made for the benefit of the consumer and may lead to additional expense for the insurer and, thus, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

The NAIC and the Company’s state regulators may also be influenced by the initiatives and regulatory structures or schemes of international regulatory bodies, and those initiatives or regulatory structures or schemes may not translate readily into the regulatory structures or schemes or the legal system (including the interpretation or application of standards by juries) under which U.S. insurers must operate. In August 2013, the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”) released a report encouraging the U.S. to move toward a federal regulatory system for insurance. The International Association of Insurance Supervisors (“IAIS”) is developing group-wide supervision requirements, including a global capital standard, to be applied to large, internationally active insurance groups (“IAIGs”), as well as standards for companies posing systemic risk to be applied to global systemically important insurers (“G-SII’s”). These are only a few examples of international developments impacting the global insurance market. At this time, FSB reports, IAIS Insurance Core Principles, and other international work products are not directly binding on the Company, and the Company has not been identified as either an IAIG or G-SII. However, thereThere is increasing pressure to conform to international standards due to the globalization of the business of insurance and the most recent financial crisis. Any international reports, standards or mandates

In addition to developments at the NAIC and in the United States, the Financial Stability Board (“FSB”), consisting of representatives of national financial authorities of the G20 nations, and the G20 have issued a series of proposals intended to produce significant changes in how financial companies, particularly companies that directly impact, or indirectly influence,are members of large and complex financial groups, should be regulated.

The International Association of Insurance Supervisors (“IAIS”), at the naturedirection of U.S. regulation or industry operations, or become applicablethe FSB, has published a methodology for identifying “global systemically important insurers” (“G-SIIs”) and high level policy measures that will apply to G-SIIs. The FSB, working with national authorities and the IAIS, has designated nine insurance groups as G-SIIs. The IAIS is working on the policy measures which include higher capital requirements and enhanced supervision. Although neither the Company directly or indirectly,nor Dai-ichi Life has been designated a G-SII, the list of designated insurers will be updated annually by the FSB. It is possible that the greater size and reach of the combined group as a result of the Company becoming a subsidiary of Dai-ichi Life, or a change in the methodologies or their application, could lead to the combined group’s designation as a G-SII.

The IAIS is also in the process of developing a common framework for the supervision of internationally active insurance groups (“IAIGs”), which is targeted to be implemented in 2019. Under the proposed framework, insurance groups deemed to be IAIGs may be required by their regulators to comply with new global capital requirements, which may exceed the sum of state or other local capital requirements. In addition, the IAIS is developing a model framework for the supervision of IAIGs that contemplates “group wide supervision” across national boundaries, which requires each IAIG to conduct its own risk and solvency assessment to monitor and manage its overall solvency. It is possible that, as a result of the Merger, the combined group may be deemed an IAIG, in which case it may be subject to supervision and capital requirements beyond those applicable to any competitors who are not designated as an IAIG.

While it is not yet known how or if these actions will impact the Company, such regulation could result in increased costs of compliance, increased disclosure, less flexibility in capital management and more burdensome regulation and capital requirements for specific lines of business, and could impact the Company and its reserve and capital requirements, financial condition or results of operations.

 

Although some NAIC pronouncements, particularly as they affect accounting, reserving and risk basedrisk-based capital issues, may take effect automatically without affirmative action taken by the states, the NAIC is not a governmental entity and its processes and procedures do not comport with those to which governmental entities typically adhere. Therefore, it is possible that actions could be taken by the NAIC that become effective without the procedural safeguards that would be present if governmental action was required. In addition, with respect to some financial

143



Table of Contents

regulations and guidelines, states sometimes defer to the interpretation of the insurance department of a non-domiciliary state. Neither the action of the domiciliary state nor the action of the NAIC is binding on a non-domiciliary state. Accordingly, a state could choose to follow a different interpretation. The Company is also subject to the risk that compliance with any particular regulator’s interpretation of a legal, accounting or actuarial issue may result in non-compliance with another regulator’s interpretation of the same issue, particularly when compliance is judged in hindsight. There is an additional risk that any particular regulator’s interpretation of a legal, accounting or actuarial issue may change over time to the Company’s detriment, or that changes to the overall legal or market environment may cause the Company to change its practices in ways that may, in some cases, limit its growth or profitability. Statutes, regulations, interpretations, and instructions may be applied with retroactive impact, particularly in areas such as accounting, reserve and risk basedrisk-based capital requirements. Also, regulatory actions with prospective impact can potentially have a significant impact on currently sold products.

 

The NAIC has announced more focused inquiries on certain matters that could have an impact on the Company’s financial condition and results of operations. Such inquiries concern, for example, examination of statutory accounting disclosures for separate accounts, insurer use of captive reinsurance companies, certain aspects of insurance holding company reporting and disclosure, reserving for universal life products with secondary guarantees, reinsurance, and risk basedrisk-based capital calculations. In addition, the NAIC continues to consider various initiatives to change and modernize its financial and solvency requirements and regulations. It is considering changing to, or has considered and

138



Table of Contents

passed, a principles-based reserving method for life insurance and annuity reserves, changes to the accounting and risk-based capital regulations, changes to the governance practices of insurers, and other items. Some of these proposed changes, including implementing a principles-based reserving methodology, would require the approval of state legislatures. The Company cannot provide any estimate as to what impact these more focused inquiries or proposed changes, if they occur, will have on its product mix, product profitability, reserve and capital requirements, financial condition or results of operations.

 

With respect to reserving requirements for universal life policies with secondary guarantees (“ULSG”), in 2012 the NAIC adopted revisions to Actuarial Guideline XXXVIII (“AG38”) addressing those requirements. Some of the regulatory participants in the AG38 revision process appeared to believe that one of the purposes of the revisions was to calculate reserves for ULSG similarly to reserves for guaranteed level term life insurance contracts with the same guarantee period. The effect of the revisions was to increase the level of reserves that must be held by insurers on ULSG with certain product designs that are issued on and after January 1, 2013, and to cause insurers to test the adequacy of reserves, and possibly increase the reserves, on ULSG with certain product designs that were issued before January 1, 2013. The Company has developed and introduced a new ULSG product for sales in 2013. The Company cannot predict future regulatory actions that could negatively impact the Company’s ability to market its new product.this or other products. Such regulatory reactions could include, for example, withdrawal of state approvals of the new product, or adoption of further changes to AG38 or other adverse action including retroactive regulatory action that could negatively impact the Company’s new product. A disruption of the Company’s ability to sell financially viable life insurance products or an increase in reserves on ULSG policies issued either before or after January 1, 2013, could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

The Company currently uses affiliated captive reinsurance companies in various structures relating to finance certain statutory reserves based on a regulation entitled “Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation,” commonly known as “Regulation XXX,” and a supporting guideline entitled “The Application of the Valuation of Life Insurance Policies Model Regulation,” commonly known as “Guideline AXXX, which are associated with term life insurance and universal life insurance with secondary guarantees, andrespectively, as well as to reduce the volatility in statutory risk based capital associated with certain guaranteed benefits relating to variable annuities, to finance statutory requirements for so-called XXX and AXXX reserves and reserves for variable annuity contracts with guaranteed minimum withdrawal and death benefits.benefit riders associated with the Company’s variable annuity products. The NAIC, through various committees, subgroups and dedicated task forces, has undertaken a review ofis reviewing the use of captives and special purpose vehicles used to transfer insurance risk in relation to existing state laws and regulations, and several committees have adopted or exposed for comment white papers and reports that, if or when implemented, could place significant limitationsimpose additional requirements on the use of captives and other reinsurers (including traditional reinsurers) (the “Affected Business”). The NAIC’s Financial Condition (E) Committee adopted an “interim solution for captives” inof the form ofNAIC recently established a new charge requiring the Financial AnalysisVariable Annuity Issues Working Group (or “FAWG”) to review captive transactions submitted byexamine company use of variable annuity captives. In addition, the states in a peer review and comment process. The Principles Based Reserving Implementation (EX) Task Force of the NAIC, charged with analysis of the adoption of a principles-based reserving methodology, recently adopted the “conceptual framework” contained in a report issued by Rector & Associates, Inc., dated June 4, 2014 (as modified or supplemented, the “Rector Report”), that contains numerous recommendations pertaining to the regulation and use of certain captive reinsurers. Certain high-level

144



Table of Contents

recommendations have been adopted and assigned to various NAIC working groups, which working groups are in various stages of discussions regarding recommendations. However,One recommendation of the Rector Report has been adopted as Actuarial Guideline XL VIII (“AG48”). AG48 sets more restrictive standards on the permitted collateral utilized to back reserves of a captive. Other recommendations in the Rector Report are subject to ongoing comment and revision. It is unclear at this time to what extent the recommendations in the Rector Report, or additional or revised recommendations relating to captive transactions or reinsurance transactions in general, will be adopted by the NAIC. If the recommendations proposed in the Rector Report are implemented, it will likely be difficult for the Company to establish new captive financing arrangements on a basis consistent with past practicespractices. As a result of AG48 and the Rector Report, the implementation of new captive structures in the future may be less capital efficient, may lead to lower product returns and/or increased product pricing or result in reduced sales of certain products. Additionally, in some circumstances AG48 and the implementation of the recommendations in the Rector Report could impact the Company’s ability to engage in certain reinsurance transactions with non-affiliates.

 

The NAIC’s Financial Regulation Standards and Accreditation (F) Committee is considering a proposal to include insurer-owned captives and special purpose vehicles that are single-state licensed but assume reinsurance from cedants operating in multiple states within the definition of “multi-state insurer” found in the preambles to Parts A and B of the NAIC Financial Regulation Standards and Accreditation Program. If adopted, the revised definition would subject certain captives (on a prospective basis, as proposed) to all of the Accreditation Standards applicable to other traditional multi-state insurers, including standards related to capital and surplus requirements, risk-based capital requirements, investment laws and credit for reinsurance laws. Such application would likely have a significant and adverse impact on the Company’s ability to engage in captive finance transactions on the same or a similar basis as in past periods.

 

Any regulatory action or changes in interpretation that materially adversely affects the Company’s use or materially increases the Company’s cost of using captives or reinsurers for the Affected Business, either retroactively or

139



Table of Contents

prospectively, could have a material adverse impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations. If the Company were required to discontinue its use of captives for intercompany reinsurance transactions on a retroactive basis, adverse impacts would include early termination fees payable with respect to certain structures, diminished capital position and higher cost of capital. Additionally, finding alternative means to support policy liabilities efficiently is an unknown factor that would be dependent, in part, on future market conditions and the Company’s ability to obtain required regulatory approvals. On a prospective basis, discontinuation of the use of captives could impact the types, amounts and pricing of products offered by the Company’s insurance subsidiaries.

 

Recently, new laws and regulations have been adopted in certain states that require life insurers to search for unreported deaths. The National Conference of Insurance Legislators (“NCOIL”) has adopted the Model Unclaimed Life Insurance Benefits Act (the “Unclaimed Benefits Act”) and legislation has been enacted in various states that is similar to the Unclaimed Benefits Act, although each state’s version differs in some respects. The Unclaimed Benefits Act would impose new requirements on insurers to periodically compare their in-force life insurance and annuity contracts and retained asset accounts against a Death Database, investigate any potential matches to confirm the death and determine whether benefits are due, and to attempt to locate the beneficiaries of any benefits that are due or, if no beneficiary can be located, escheat the benefit to the state as unclaimed property. Other states in which the Company does business may also consider adopting legislation similar to the Unclaimed Benefits Act. The Company cannot predict whether such legislation will be proposed or enacted in additional states. Additionally, the NAIC Unclaimed Life Insurance Benefits (A) Working Group recently recommendedundertook to its parent committee the development of an NAICdevelop a model unclaimed property law that if developed, would overlapoverlaps with the NCOIL basedNCOIL-based laws already adopted in several states. Other life insurance industry associations and regulatory associations are also considering these matters.

 

A number of state treasury departments and administrators of unclaimed property have audited life insurance companies for compliance with unclaimed property laws. The focus of the audits has been to determine whether there have been maturities of policies or contracts, or policies that have exceeded limiting age with respect to which death benefits or other payments under the policies should be treated as unclaimed property that should be escheated to the state. In addition, the audits have sought to identify unreported deaths of insureds. There is no clear basis in previously existing law for treating an unreported death as giving rise to a policy benefit that would be subject to unclaimed property procedures. A number of life insurers, however, have entered into resolution agreements with state treasury departments under which the life insurers agreed to procedures for comparing their previously issued life insurance and annuity contracts and retained asset accounts against a Death Database, treating confirmed deaths as giving rise to a death benefit under their policies, locating beneficiaries and paying them the benefits and interest, and escheating the

145



Table of Contents

benefits and interest to the state if the beneficiary could not be found. The amounts publicly reported to have been paid to beneficiaries and/or escheated to the states have been substantial.

 

The NAIC has established an Investigations of Life/Annuity Claims Settlement Practices (D) Task Force to coordinate targeted multi-state examinations of life insurance companies on claims settlement practices. The state insurance regulators on the Task Force have initiated targeted multi-state examinations of life insurance companies with respect to the companies’ claims paying practices and use of a Death Database to identify unreported deaths in their life insurance policies, annuity contracts and retained asset accounts. There is no clear basis in previously existing law for requiring a life insurer to search for unreported deaths in order to determine whether a benefit is owed. A number of life insurers, however, have entered into settlement or consent agreements with state insurance regulators under which the life insurers agreed to implement systems and procedures for periodically comparing their life insurance and annuity contracts and retained asset accounts against a Death Database, treating confirmed deaths as giving rise to a death benefit under their policies, locating beneficiaries and paying them the benefits and interest, and escheating the benefits and interest to the state if the beneficiary could not be found. It has been publicly reported that the life insurers have paid substantial administrative and/or examination fees to the insurance regulators in connection with the settlement or consent agreements.

 

Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries as well as certain other insurance companies from whom the Company has coinsured blocks of life insurance and annuity policies are subject to unclaimed property audits and/or targeted multistate examinations by insurance regulators similar to those described above. It is possible that the audits, examinations and/or the enactment of state laws similar to the Unclaimed Benefits Act could result in additional payments to beneficiaries, additional escheatment of funds deemed abandoned under state laws, payment of administrative penalties and/or examination fees to state authorities, and changes to the Company’s procedures for identifying unreported deaths and escheatment of abandoned property. It is possible any such additional payments and

140



Table of Contents

any costs related to changes in Company procedures could materially impact the Company’s financial results from operations. It is also possible that life insurers, including the Company, may be subject to claims, regulatory actions, law enforcement actions, and civil litigation arising from their prior business practices. Any resulting liabilities, payments or costs, including initial and ongoing costs of changes to the Company’s procedures or systems, could be significant and could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

During December 2012, the West Virginia Treasurer filed actions against the Company’s subsidiaries Protective Life Insurance Company and West Coast Life Insurance Company in West Virginia state court (State of West Virginia ex rel. John D. Perdue v. Protective Life Insurance Company, State of West Virginia ex rel. John D. Perdue v. West Coast Life Insurance Company; Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss granted on December 27, 2013; Notice of Appeal filed on January 27, 2014). The actions, which also name numerous other life insurance companies, allege that the companies violated the West Virginia Uniform Unclaimed Property Act, seek to compel compliance with the Act, and seek payment of unclaimed property, interest, and penalties. While the legal theory or theories that may give rise to liability in the West Virginia Treasurer litigation are uncertain, it is possible that other jurisdictions may pursue similar actions. The Company does not currently believe that losses, if any, arising from the West Virginia Treasurer litigation will be material. The Company cannot, however, predict whether other jurisdictions will pursue similar actions or, if they do, whether such actions will have a material impact on the Company’s financial results from operations. Additionally, the California Controller has recently sued several insurance carriers for alleged failure to comply with audit requests from an appointed third party auditor. The Company cannot predict whether California might pursue a similar action against the Company and further cannot predict whether other jurisdictions might pursue similar actions. The Company does not believe however that any such action would have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

Under insurance guaranty fund laws in most states, insurance companies doing business therein can be assessed up to prescribed limits for policyholder losses incurred by insolvent companies. From time to time, companies may be asked to contribute amounts beyond prescribed limits. The Company cannot predict the amount or timing of any future assessments.

 

The purchase of life insurance products is limited by state insurable interest laws, which in most jurisdictions require that the purchaser of life insurance name a beneficiary that has some interest in the sustained life of the insured. To some extent, the insurable interest laws present a barrier to the life settlement, or “stranger-owned” industry, in which a financial entity acquires an interest in life insurance proceeds, and efforts have been made in some states to

146



Table of Contents

liberalize the insurable interest laws. To the extent these laws are relaxed, the Company’s lapse assumptions may prove to be incorrect.

 

At the federal level, bills are routinely introduced in both chambers of the United States Congress (“Congress”) that could affect life insurers. In the past, Congress has considered legislation that would impact insurance companies in numerous ways, such as providing for an optional federal charter or a federal presence for insurance, preempting state law in certain respects regarding the regulation of reinsurance, increasing federal oversight in areas such as consumer protection and other matters. The Company cannot predict whether or in what form legislation will be enacted and, if so, whether the enacted legislation will positively or negatively affect the Company or whether any effects will be material.

The Company’s sole stockholder, Dai-ichi Life, is subject to regulation by the Japanese Financial Services Authority (“JFSA”). Under applicable laws and regulations, Dai-ichi Life is required to provide notice to or obtain the consent of the JFSA prior to taking certain actions or engaging in certain transactions, either directly or indirectly through its subsidiaries, including the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries.

 

The Company is subject to various conditions and requirements of the Healthcare Act. The Healthcare Act makes significant changes to the regulation of health insurance and may affect the Company in various ways. The Healthcare Act may affect the small blocks of business the Company has offered or acquired over the years that are, or are deemed to constitute, health insurance. The Healthcare Act may also affect the benefit plans the Company sponsors for employees or retirees and their dependents, the Company’s expense to provide such benefits, the tax liabilities of the Company in connection with the provision of such benefits, and the Company’s ability to attract or retain employees. In addition, the Company may be subject to regulations, guidance or determinations emanating from the various regulatory authorities authorized under the Healthcare Act. The Company cannot predict the effect that the Healthcare Act, or any regulatory pronouncement made thereunder, will have on its results of operations or financial condition.

 

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) enacted in July 2010 made sweeping changes to the regulation of financial services entities, products and markets. Certain provisions of Dodd-Frank are or may become applicable to the Company, its competitors or those entities with which the Company does business. Such provisions include, but are not limited to the following: the establishment of the Federal Insurance

141



Table of Contents

Office, changes to the regulation and standards applicable to broker-dealers and investment advisors, changes to the regulation of reinsurance, changes to regulations affecting the rights of shareowners, and the imposition of additional regulation over credit rating agencies.

 

Dodd-Frank also created the Financial Stability Oversight Council (the “FSOC”), which has issued a final rule and interpretive guidance setting forth the methodology by which it will determine whether a non-bank financial company is a systemically important financial institution (“SIFI”). A non-banknon- bank financial company, such as the Company, that is designated as a SIFI by the FSOC will become subject to supervision by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). The Company is not currently supervised by the Federal Reserve. Such supervision could impact the Company’s requirements relating to capital, liquidity, stress testing, limits on counterparty credit exposure, compliance and governance, early remediation in the event of financial weakness and other prudential matters, and in other ways the Company currently cannot anticipate. FSOC-designated non-bank financial companies will also be required to prepare resolution plans, so-calledso- called “living wills,” that set out how they could most efficiently be liquidated if they endangered the U.S. financial system or the broader economy. The FSOC has conducted two rounds of SIFI designation consideration. However, this process is still very new, and the FSOC continues to make changes to its process for designating a company as a SIFI. The FSOC has made its initial SIFI designations, and the Company was not designated as such. However, the Company could be considered and designated at any time. Because the process is in its initial stages, the Company is at this time unable to predict the impact on an entity that is supervised as a SIFI by the Federal Reserve Board. The Company is not able to predict whether the capital requirements or other requirements imposed on SIFIs may impact the requirements applicable to the Company even if it is not designated as a SIFI. The uncertainty about regulatory requirements could influence the Company’s product line or other business decisions with respect to some product lines. There is a similarly uncertain international designation process. The Financial Stability Board, appointed by the G-20 Summit, recently designated nine insurers as “G-SII’s,“G-SIIs,” or global systemically-important insurers. As with the designation of SIFI’s, it is unclear at this time how additional capital and other requirements affect the insurance and financial industries. The insurers designated as G-SIIs to date represent organizations larger than the Company, but the possibility remains that the Company could be so designated.

147



Table of Contents

 

Additionally, Dodd-Frank created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”), an independent division of the Department of Treasury with jurisdiction over credit, savings, payment, and other consumer financial products and services, other than investment products already regulated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission. CFPB has issued a rule to bring under its supervisory authority certain non-banks whose activities or products it determines pose risks to consumers. It is unclear at this time which activities or products will be covered by this rule. Certain of the Company’s subsidiaries sell products that may be regulated by the CFPB. CFPB continues to bring enforcement actions involving a growing number of issues, including actions using state Attorney’s General, which could directly or indirectly affect the Company or use any of its subsidiaries. Additionally, the CFPB is exploring the possibility of helping Americans manage their retirement savings and is considering the extent of its authority in that area. The Company is unable at this time to predict the impact of these activities on the Company.

 

Dodd-Frank includes a new framework of regulation of over-the-counterover-the- counter (“OTC”) derivatives markets which requires clearing of certain types of transactions which have been or are currently traded OTC by the Company. The types of transactions to be cleared are expected to increase in the future. The new framework could potentially impose additional costs, including increased margin requirements and additional regulation on the Company. Increased margin requirements on the Company’s part, combined with restrictions on securities that will qualify as eligible collateral, could continue to reduce its liquidity and require an increase in its holdings of cash and government securities with lower yields causing a reduction in income. The Company uses derivative financial instruments to mitigate a wide range of risks in connection with its businesses, including those arising from its variable annuity products with guaranteed benefit features. The derivative clearing requirements of Dodd-FrankDodd- Frank could continue to increase the cost of the Company’s risk mitigation and expose it to the risk of a default by a clearinghouse with respect to the Company’s cleared derivative transactions.

 

Numerous provisions of Dodd-Frank require the adoption of implementing rules and/or regulations. The process of adopting such implementing rules and/or regulations have in some instances been delayed beyond the timeframes imposed by Dodd-Frank. Until the various final regulations are promulgated pursuant to Dodd-Frank, the full impact of the regulations on the Company will remain unclear. In addition, Dodd-Frank mandates multiple studies, which could result in additional legislation or regulation applicable to the insurance industry, the Company, its competitors or the entities with which the Company does business. Legislative or regulatory requirements imposed by

142



Table of Contents

or promulgated in connection with Dodd-Frank may impact the Company in many ways, including but not limited to the following: placing the Company at a competitive disadvantage relative to its competition or other financial services entities, changing the competitive landscape of the financial services sector and/or the insurance industry, making it more expensive for the Company to conduct its business, requiring the reallocation of significant company resources to government affairs, legal and compliance-related activities, causing historical market behavior or statistics utilized by the Company in connection with its efforts to manage risk and exposure to no longer be predictive of future risk and exposure or otherwise have a material adverse effect on the overall business climate as well as the Company’s financial condition and results of operations.

 

The Company may be subject to regulation by the United States Department of Labor when providing a variety of products and services to employee benefit plans and individual investors that are governed by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”). The Department of Labor is currently in the process of re-proposinghas proposed a rule that would change the circumstances under which one who works with employee benefit plans and Individual Retirement Accounts would be considered a fiduciary under ERISA. Severe penalties are imposed for breach of duties under ERISA and the Company cannot predict the impact that the Department of Labor’s re-proposedproposed rule may have on its operations.

 

Certain life insurance policies, contracts, and annuities offered by the Company’s subsidiaries are subject to regulation under the federal securities laws administered by the SEC. The federal securities laws contain regulatory restrictions and criminal, administrative, and private remedial provisions. From time to time, the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) examine or investigate the activities of broker-dealers and investment advisors, including the Company’s affiliated broker-dealers and investment advisors. These examinations or investigations often focus on the activities of the registered representatives and registered investment advisors doing business through such entities and the entities’ supervision of those persons. It is possible that any examination or investigation could lead to enforcement action by the regulator and/or may result in payments of fines and penalties,

148



Table of Contents

payments to customers, or both, as well as changes in systems or procedures of such entities, any of which could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

 

In addition, the SEC is reviewing the standard of conduct applicable to brokers, dealers, and investment advisers when those entities provide personalized investment advice about securities to retail customers. FINRA has also issued a report addressing how its member firms might identify and address conflicts of interest including conflicts related to the introduction of new products and services and the compensation of the member firms’ associated persons. These regulatory initiatives could have an impact on Company operations and the manner in which broker-dealers and investment advisers distribute the Company’s products.

 

The Company may also be subject to regulation by governments of the countries in which it currently does, or may in the future, do, business, as well as regulation by the U.S. Government with respect to its operations in foreign countries, such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Penalties for violating the various laws governing the Company’s business in other countries may include restrictions upon business operations, fines and imprisonment, both within the U.S. and abroad. U.S. enforcement of anti-corruption laws continues to increase in magnitude, and penalties may be substantial.

 

The Company is subject to conditions and requirements set forth in the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) which places restrictions on the use of automated telephone and facsimile machines. Class action lawsuits alleging violations of the act have been filed against a number of companies, including life insurance carriers. These class action lawsuits contain allegations that defendant carriers were vicariously liable for the alleged wrongful conduct of agents who violated the TCPA. Some of the class actions have resulted in substantial settlements against other insurers. Any such actions against the Company could result in a material adverse effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.

Other types of regulation that could affect the Company and its subsidiaries include insurance company investment laws and regulations, state statutory accounting and reserving practices, anti-trustantitrust laws, minimum solvency requirements, enterprise risk requirements, state securities laws, federal privacy laws, insurable interest laws, federal anti-money laundering and anti-terrorism laws, employment and immigration laws (including laws in Alabama where over half of the Company’s employees are located), and because the Company owns and operates real property, state, federal, and local environmental laws. Under some circumstances, severe penalties may be imposed for breach of these laws.

 

The Company cannot predict what form any future changes to laws and/or regulations affecting participants in the financial services sector and/or insurance industry, including the Company and its competitors or those entities with which it does business, may take, or what effect, if any, such changes may have.

 

143New accounting rules, changes to existing accounting rules, or the grant of permitted accounting practices to competitors could negatively impact the Company.

The Company is required to comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). A number of organizations are instrumental in the development and interpretation of GAAP such as the SEC, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”), and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (“AICPA”). GAAP is subject to constant review by these organizations and others in an effort to address emerging accounting rules and issue interpretative accounting guidance on a continual basis. The Company can give no assurance that future changes to GAAP will not have a negative impact on the Company. GAAP includes the requirement to carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value. These fair values are sensitive to various factors including, but not limited to, interest rate movements, credit spreads, and various other factors. Because of this, changes in these fair values may cause increased levels of volatility in the Company’s financial statements.

The FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board are working on several projects that could result in significant changes to GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Furthermore, the SEC is considering whether and how to incorporate IFRS into the U.S. financial reporting system. The changes to GAAP and potential incorporation of IFRS into the U.S. financial reporting system will impose special demands on issuers in the areas of governance, employee training, internal controls, contract fulfillment and disclosure and will likely affect how we manage our business, as it will likely affect other business processes such as design of compensation plans, product

149



Table of Contents

design, etc. The Company is unable to predict whether, and if so, when these projects and ultimately convergence with IFRS will be adopted and/or implemented.

In addition, the Company’s insurance subsidiaries are required to comply with statutory accounting principles (“SAP”). SAP and various components of SAP (such as actuarial reserving methodology) are subject to constant review by the NAIC and its task forces and committees as well as state insurance departments in an effort to address emerging issues and otherwise improve or alter financial reporting. Various proposals either are currently or have previously been pending before committees and task forces of the NAIC, some of which, if enacted, would negatively affect the Company. The NAIC is also currently working to reform model regulation in various areas, including comprehensive reforms relating to life insurance reserves and the accounting for such reserves. The Company cannot predict whether or in what form reforms will be enacted by state legislatures and, if so, whether the enacted reforms will positively or negatively affect the Company. In addition, the NAIC Accounting Practices and Procedures manual provides that state insurance departments may permit insurance companies domiciled therein to depart from SAP by granting them permitted accounting practices. The Company cannot predict whether or when the insurance departments of the states of domicile of its competitors may permit them to utilize advantageous accounting practices that depart from SAP, the use of which is not permitted by the insurance departments of the states of domicile of the Company’s insurance subsidiaries. With respect to regulations and guidelines, states sometimes defer to the interpretation of the insurance department of the state of domicile. Neither the action of the domiciliary state nor action of the NAIC is binding on a state. Accordingly, a state could choose to follow a different interpretation. The Company can give no assurance that future changes to SAP or components of SAP or the grant of permitted accounting practices to its competitors will not have a negative impact on the Company. For additional information regarding pending NAIC reforms, please see Item 7, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

150



Table of Contents

 

Item 6.                     ExhibitsExhibit Index

ItemExhibit

 

 

Number

 

Document

3(a)

2011 Amended and Restated Charter of Protective Life Insurance Company dated as of June 27, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed March 29, 2012.

3(b)

2011 Amended and Restated By-Laws of Protective Life Insurance Company dated as of June 27, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011 filed March 29, 2012.

12

 

Consolidated Earnings Ratio

31(a)

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.2002.

31(b)

 

Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.2002.

32(a)

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.2002.

32(b)

 

Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, filed herewith.2002.

101

 

Financial statements from the quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Protective Life Insurance Company for the quarter ended September 30, 2014,March 31, 2015, filed on NovemberMay 13, 2014,2015, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income, (ii) the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss), (iii) the Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets, (iv) the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Shareowner’s Equity, (v) the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows, and (iv) the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

 

144151



Table of Contents

 

SIGNATURE

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Company has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

 

PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY

 

 

 

 

 

Date:   November 13, 2014

May 13, 2015

By:

/s/ Steven G. Walker

 

 

Steven G. Walker

 

 

Senior Vice President, Controller

and Chief Accounting Officer

 

145152