Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

xQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2016March 31, 2017

oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                 to                

Commission File Number: 001-33494

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation

1101 Skokie Blvd., Suite 300

Northbrook, IL 60062

(Address of Principal Executive Offices including zip code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including area code (847) 239-8800

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes x  No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o  No x

There were 96,627,34196,792,424 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock, $0.0001 par value, outstanding at OctoberApril 19, 2016.2017.

Table of Contents

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

Index to Form 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

i

Table of Contents

PART 1. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. - FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

(unaudited)

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

KAPSTONE PAPER AND PACKAGING CORPORATION
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(In thousands, except share and per share amounts)

(unaudited)

1.                                      Financial Statements

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” or “KapStone”) have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of a normal recurring nature) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2016March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016.2017. For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016.

We report our operating results in two reportable segments: Paper and Packaging and Distribution. Our Paper and Packaging segment manufactures and sells a wide variety of containerboard, corrugated products and specialty paper for industrial and consumer markets. The Distribution segment, was established June 1, 2015 concurrentthrough Victory, a North American distributor of packaging materials, with more than 60 distribution centers located in the acquisitionUnited States, Mexico and Canada, provides packaging materials and related products to a wide variety of Victory Packaging, L.P. and its subsidiaries (“Victory”).customers.  For more information about our segments, see Note 12, Segment Information.

In 2016, the Company entered into two joint venture agreements that are accounted for using the equity method.

In these consolidated financial statements, certain amounts in prior periods’ consolidated financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Amortization of intangible assets and the fair value of the contingent consideration liability are now separately identified in the Statement of Cash Flows and the presentation of Cash Flows for 2015 has been recast to conform to the current year presentation.  These reclassifications did not affect our results of operations, financial position, or cash flows.

2.                                      Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting StandardsStandard’s Board (“FASB’FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”. The guidance in this update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards (for example, insurance contracts or lease contracts). The guidance in this update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605, “Revenue Recognition”, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the Industry Topics of the Codification. Additionally, this update supersedes some cost guidance included in Subtopic 605-35, “Revenue Recognition—Construction-Type and Production-Type Contracts”. The standard will be effective for public entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods therein. Additionally the FASB approved the option to early adopt up to the original effective date (fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016). We are currentlyin the diagnostic phase of evaluating the overall impact that the adoption of ASU 2014-092014-09. The Company has determined that it will have on our financial position, results of operations and disclosures.

In April 2015,adopt this standard utilizing the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, “Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”,modified retrospective method, which changes the presentation of debt issuance costs in financial statements. ASU 2015-03 requires an entity to present such costswill result in the balance sheet as a direct deduction fromrecognition of the related debt liability rather thancumulative effect of initially applying the standard (if any) as an asset. Amortization ofadjustment to opening retained earnings for the costsfiscal year beginning January 1, 2018. During 2016, the Company reported its progress to management and the Audit Committee on a periodic basis. The Company will continue to be reportedprovide additional disclosure as interest expense. ASU 2015-03 was adoptedthe implementation plan progresses during the interim period ended March 31, 2016, and it had no material impact on our financial statements.2017.

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, “Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory”, which is intended to simplify the subsequent measurement of inventories by replacing the current lower of cost or market test with a lower of cost and net realizable value test.  The guidance applies only to inventories for which cost is determined by methods other than last-in first-out and the retail inventory method.  Application of the standard, which should be applied prospectively, is required for the annual and interim periods beginning after December

15, 2016.  Early adoption is permitted.  The Company does not expectASU 2015-11 was adopted during the adoption of this standard to have ainterim period ended March 31, 2017, and it had no material impact on itsthe Company’s consolidated balance sheets.financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”. This guidance revises existing practice related to accounting for leases under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 840 Leases (ASC 840) for both lessees and lessors. The new guidance in ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for virtually all of their leases (other than leases that meet the definition of a short-term lease). The lease liability will be equal to the present value of lease payments and the right-of-use asset will be based on the lease liability, subject to adjustment such as for initial direct costs. For income statement purposes, the new standard retains a dual model similar to ASC 840, requiring leases to be classified as either operating or

finance. For lessees, operating leases will result in straight-line expense (similar to current accounting by lessees for operating leases under ASC 840), while finance leases will result in a front-loaded expense pattern (similar to current accounting by lessees for capital leases under ASC 840). While the new standard maintains similar accounting for lessors as under ASC 840, the new standard reflects updates to, among other things, align with certain changes to the lessee model. The guidance is effective for public entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities. We are currently evaluatingThe Company does have a significant number of leases for both property and equipment. As such, the impactCompany expects that the adoption of ASU 2016-02there will havebe a material impact on our financial position, results of operations and disclosures.disclosures upon the adoption of ASU 2016-02. The Company will provide additional disclosure as the implementation plan progresses.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting”, which will requirerequires all income tax effects of awards to be recognized in the income statement when the awards vest or are settled. It also will allowallows an employer to repurchase more of an employee’s shares than it can today for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting and to make a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur.  The guidance iswas effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted.  We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-09 will have on our financial position, resultswas adopted prospectively during the interim period ended March 31, 2017, and it increased the Company’s provision for incomes taxes by $0.5 million. The Company elected to continue to recognize estimated forfeitures over the term of operations and disclosures.the awards.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments”, which clarifies the treatment of several cash flow categories. In addition, ASU 2016-15 clarifies that when cash receipts and cash payments have aspects of more than one class of cash flows and cannot be separated, classification will depend on the predominant source or use. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted, including adoption in an interim period. We are currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of ASU 2016-15 will have on our cash flows and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment”, which amends the guidance in ASC 350, “Intangibles-Goodwill and Other”. The ASU eliminates the requirement to calculate the implied fair value of goodwill to measure a goodwill impairment charge. Instead, entities will record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value. The ASU is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed in periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. The ASU will be applied prospectively. We currently do not expect that the adoption of these provisions will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, “Clarifying the Definition of a Business”, which amends the guidance in ASC 805, “Business Combinations”. The ASU changes the definition of a business to assist entities with evaluating when a set of transferred assets and activities is a business. Under the new guidance, an entity first determines whether substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets. If this threshold is met, the set is not a business. If it is not met, the entity then evaluates whether the set meets the requirements that a business include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs. The ASU defines an output as “the result of inputs and processes applied to those inputs that provide goods or services to customers, investment income (such as dividends or interest), or other revenues.” The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods, and early adoption is permitted.  The ASU will be applied prospectively to any transactions occurring within the period of adoption. We currently do not expect that the adoption of these provisions will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In March, 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, “Compensation — Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” This ASU applies to all employers that offer to their employees defined benefit pension plans, other postretirement benefit plans, or other types of benefits accounted for under Topic 715, Compensation — Retirement Benefits. The ASU requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. If a separate line item or items are used to present the other components of net benefit cost, that line item or items must be appropriately described. If a separate line item or items are not used, the line item or items used in the

income statement to present the other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed. The ASU also allows only the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization when applicable (e.g., as a cost of internally manufactured inventory or a self-constructed asset). This ASU is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have not been issued or made available for issuance. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that ASU No. 2017-07 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

3.                                      API Acquisition and Equity Method Investments

Acquisition

On JulyFebruary 1, 2016,2017, the Company acquired 100 percent of the common stock of Central Florida Box Corporation (“CFB”), a corrugated products manufacturer located near Orlando, Florida, for $15.4 million, net of cash acquired. Sales and total assets of CFB are not material to KapStone.Associated Packaging, Inc. and Fast Pak, LLC (together, “API”) with operations located in Greer, South Carolina for $33.5 million. The acquisition was funded from borrowings on the Company’s $500 million revolving credit facility (“Revolver”). API provides corrugated packaging and digital production needs serving a diverse customer base, including an emphasis on fulfillment and kitting for the automotive and consumer products industries. Operating results of the acquisition since JulyFebruary 1, 20162017 are included in the Company’s Paper and Packaging segment operating results.segment. The Company has allocated the purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, of which $10.5$14.1 million has been allocated to customer relationship intangible assets, $2.8 million to plant, property and equipment, $1.7$1.8 million to net working capital $1.0and $14.8 million to goodwill (which is deductible for tax purposes) and $2.2 million to customer relationships (to be amortized over a life of 10 years).  The purchase price allocation is preliminary pending further review by management of the fair value assigned to long-livedfor intangible assets.

Transaction fees and expenses for the CFBAPI acquisition related to due diligence, advisory and legal services have been expensed as incurred.  These expenses were $0.6 million and $0.8$0.4 million for the three and nine month periodsperiod ended September 30, 2016, respectively,March 31, 2017, and were recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income.

Equity Method InvestmentsThis acquisition further strengthens the Company’s goal of increasing mill integration.

In September of 2016,conjunction with the Company made a $10.5 million investment for a 49 percent equity interest in a sheet feeder operation located in Florida.  In April of 2016,API acquisition, the Company made a $1.25 million investment for a 20 percent equity interest in a sheet feeder operation located in California.  These investments are expected to increase the Company’s vertical integration by over 60,000 tons per year and will ramp up to that level over eighteen months.

New Plant Start-up

In May of 2016, the Company began building a new sheet plant in Ontario, California with a total estimated cost of approximately $14.0 million.  The Company signed a 10 year25-year lease agreement with a total commitment of approximately $9.0$14.7 million.  The new sheet plant is expected to be manufacturing boxes by January 2017 and is intended to primarily supply the Company’s Victory Packaging operations in Southern California as well as other KapStone customers.

4.                                      Planned Maintenance Outages

Planned maintenance outage costs for the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 totaled $3.8$6.2 million and $4.4$6.6 million, respectively, and are included in cost of sales.

Planned maintenance outage costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 totaled $29.4 million and $24.1 million, respectively, and are included in cost of sales. Included in the outage costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015 was the annual planned maintenance outage at the Company’s paper mill in Roanoke Rapids, North Carolina.  In 2016, the outage lasted approximately 9 days, with a cost of approximately $8.4 million, and resulted in an 11,700 reduction in tons produced. In 2015, the outage lasted approximately 8 days, with a cost of approximately $8.0 million, and resulted in a 10,400 reduction in tons produced.  In addition, the Longview, Washington paper mill incurred $11.9 million of outage costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to $9.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

5.                                      Inventories

Inventories consist of the following at September 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively:

6.                                      Short-term Borrowings and Long-term Debt

KapStone and certain of our subsidiaries are parties to a Second Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated June 1, 2015 (as amended from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), which provides for a senior secured credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) of $1.915 billion, consisting of a Term Loan A-1 in the aggregate amount of $940 million and a Term Loan A-2 in the aggregate amount of $475 million and a $500 million revolving credit facility (the “Revolver”).the

Revolver. In addition, the Credit Facility also includes an uncommitted accordion feature that allows the Company, subject to certain significant conditions, to request additional commitments from our existing or new lenders under the Credit Facility without further approvals of any existing lenders thereunder. The aggregate amount of such increases in potential commitments (and potential borrowings) is limited to $600 million, unless the Company would maintain a pro forma total leverage ratio of 2.5 to 1.0 or less after giving effect to the increase in potential commitments (and potential borrowings).

On February 9, 2016,March 27, 2017, the Company entered into the FirstSecond Amendment (“First Amendment”) to the Credit Agreement. The First Amendment modified, among other things, the financial covenant in the Credit Agreement related to maintenance of a maximum total leverage ratio by increasing the permitted total leverage ratio for fiscal quarters ending on or prior to June 30, 2018, and itwhich modified certain defined terms used in the calculation of the financial covenants in a manner favorable to the Company. The First Amendment also modified the pricing grid applicable to interest rates and the unused commitment fee under the Credit Agreement in order to provide for an additional pricing level based on the total leverage ratio of the Company.

The Company paid approximately $2.3 million of loan amendment fees associated with the First Amendment, which are being amortized over the term of the Credit Agreement using the effective interest method.

In September of 2016, the Company made a voluntary prepayment on its term loans under the Credit Facility of $64.7 million and as a result, $0.7 million of unamortized debt issuance costs were written-off as a loss on debt extinguishment.

Short-term Borrowings

As of September 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, the Company had $11.5$26.0 million of short-term borrowings outstanding under the Revolver, which bearwith a weighted average interest at 4.25of 3.42 percent.

As of September 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, the Company has available borrowing capacity of $471.3$457.4 million under the Revolver.

Receivables Credit Facility

On June 8, 2016,February 21, 2017, the Company entered into Amendment No. 23 to the Receivables PurchaseSale Agreement (the “Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement”)  amending its Receivables Purchase Agreement dated as of September 26, 2014 (as previously amended,amend the “Receivables Purchase Agreement”).  In addition, the Company, KapStone Receivables, LLC (“KAR”), KapStone Kraft Paper Corporation, KapStone Container Corporation, KapStone Charleston Kraft LLC, Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc. and Victory (collectively, the “Originators”), entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Receivables Sales Agreement (the “Amendment to Receivables Sales Agreement” and, together with the Amendment to Receivables Purchase Agreement, the “Amendment”).  The Receivables Purchase Agreement and Receivables Sales Agreement, as amended by the Amendment, establishes the primary terms and conditions of an accounts receivable securitization program (the “Securitization Program”).  The Amendment extended of the “Facility Termination Date” (as defined inCompany and certain of its subsidiaries. All accounts receivable purchased from API and Fast Pak, LLC (the “Sellers”) and all accounts receivable generated from facilities acquired from the Receivable Purchase Agreement) from June 8, 2016Sellers that are not paid to June 6, 2017.an eligible bank account are designated as “Excluded Receivables”.

Under our Securitization Program, the OriginatorsCompany and its subsidiaries that participate in the Securitization Program (the “Originators”) sell, on an ongoing basis without recourse, certain trade receivables to KAR,KapStone Receivables, LLC (“KAR”), which is considered a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote variable interest entity (“VIE”). The Company has the authority to direct the activities of the VIE and, as a result, we have concluded that we maintain control of the VIE, are the primary beneficiary (as defined by accounting guidance) and, therefore, consolidate the account balances of KAR. As of September 30, 2016, $356.9March 31, 2017, $383.2 million of our trade accounts receivables were sold to KAR. KAR in turn assigns a collateral interest in these receivables to a financial institution under a one-year $275 million facility (the “Receivables Credit Facility”) for proceeds of $269.5$264.7 million. The assets of KAR are not available to us until all obligations of KAR are satisfied in the event of bankruptcy or insolvency proceedings.

Other Borrowing

In January 2017, the Company entered into a short-term financing agreement of $6.2 million at an annual interest rate of 2.4 percent for its annual property insurance premiums.  The agreement requires the Company to pay three quarterly payments through the term of the financing agreement ending on December 1, 2017.  As of March 31, 2017, there was $6.2 million outstanding under the current agreement.

Debt Covenants

Our Credit Agreement governing our Credit Facility contains, among other provisions, covenants with which we must comply. The covenants limit our ability to, among other things, incur indebtedness, create additional liens on our assets, make investments, engage in mergers and acquisitions and sell any assets outside the normal course of business.

As of September 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, the Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants in the Credit Agreement.

Fair Value of Debt

As of September 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, the fair value of the Company’s debt approximates the carrying value of $1.5 billion as the variable interest rates re-price frequently at current market rates. Our weighted-average cost of borrowings was 2.152.61 percent and 1.822.08 percent for the ninethree months ended September 30,March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, and September 30, 2015, respectively.

7.                                      Income Taxes

The Company’s effective income tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016March 31, 2017 was 28.941.0 percent and 32.7 percent, respectively, compared to 32.5 percent and 34.134.5 percent for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015.March 31, 2016.  The lowerhigher effective income tax rate in the three months ended September 

30, 2016 is driven by a favorable $1.4March 31, 2017 reflects $0.5 million return-to-provision adjustmentin tax expense from the Company’s recently filed 2015 federaladoption of ASU 2016-09 which requires the tax impact of elements of stock compensation to be recorded in the provision for income taxes.

Cash taxes paid in the quarter ending March 31, 2017 were $21.1 million compared to net cash tax return.refunds of $11.5 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016.

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities. The Company’s open federal tax years are 2013, 2014 and 2014.2015. The Company has open tax years for state and foreign income tax filings generally starting in 2012.

8.                                      Net Income per Share

The Company’s basic and diluted net income per share for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 is calculated as follows:

Approximately 1,100,000A total of 1,189,244 and 1,462,796 weighted average unexercised stock options were outstanding for both of the three month periods ended September 30,at March 31, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earningsnet income per share because the options were anti-dilutive.

Approximately 1,809,000 and 900,000 of unexercised stock options were outstanding for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because the optionsawards were anti-dilutive.

9.                                      Pension Plan and Post-Retirement Benefits

Defined Benefit Plan

Net pension cost (benefit) recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 for the Company’s defined benefit plan (the “Pension Plan”) is as follows:

The Company currently does not anticipate making any Pension Plan contributions in 2016.2017. This estimate is based on current tax laws, plan asset performance, and liability assumptions, which are subject to change.

The Company provides postretirement health care insurance benefits through an indemnity plan for certain salary and non-salary of its subsidiary Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc. (“Longview”) employees and their dependents.  The Company anticipates making contributions to its’its postretirement plans in 20162017 as claims are submitted.

Defined Contribution Plan

The Company offers 401(k) Defined Contribution Plans (“Contribution Plans”) to eligible employees.  The Company’s monthly contributions are based on the matching of certain employee contributions or based on a union negotiated formula. For the three months ended September 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, the Company recognized expense of $2.5$6.2 million and $5.5 million, respectively, for matching contributions.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, the Company recognized expense of $8.5 million and $15.5$3.6 million, respectively, for matching contributions.

In March 2016,2017, the Company suspendedrestored matching contributions to its Contribution Plans for certain employees.employees that were previously suspended during 2016.  As a result, contributions were $3.2$2.6 million lowerhigher in the quarter ended September 30, 2016, and $8.5 million lower for the nine months ended September 30, 2016,March 31, 2017 compared to the same period in 2015.  This was partially offset by an increase attributable2016.

Multiemployer Pension Plan

In conjunction with each of the Longview and U.S. Corrugated acquisitions, the Company assumed participation in the GCIU-Employer Retirement Fund for approximately 300 hourly employees at four corrugated products manufacturing plants.  On October 31, 2016, the Company provided formal notification to the inclusionplan trustee of Victory underits withdrawal from the Contribution Plansplan and cessation of $0.2plan contributions effective December 31, 2016.  Accordingly, the Company recorded an estimated withdrawal liability of approximately $6.4 million, forbased on annual payments of approximately $0.4 million over 20 years, discounted at a credit adjusted risk-free rate return of approximately 3.6 percent. This liability is based on an analysis of the quarter ended September 30, 2016, and $1.5 million forfacts available to management; however, the nine months ended September 30, 2016 compared to 2015.withdrawal liability will ultimately be determined by the plan trustee.

10.                               Stock-Based Compensation

In the quarter ended March 31, 2017, the compensation committee of the board of directors approved stock-based awards to executive officers, certain employees and directors.  The 2017 award consisted of the grant of 957,270 stock options, and 342,264 restricted stock units with a combined cost of $15.1 million.

The Company accounts for stock-based awards in accordance with ASC 718, “Compensation — Stock Compensation,” which requires that the cost resulting from all share-based payment transactions be recognized as compensation cost over the vesting period based on the fair value of the instrument on the date of grant.

Total stock-based compensation expense related to the stock option and restricted stock unit grants for the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 is as follows:

Total unrecognized stock-based compensation cost related to the stock options and restricted stock units as of September 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 20152016 is as follows:

As of September 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, total unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock options and restricted stock units is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.12.5 years and 2.02.4 years, respectively.

Stock Options

Stock option awards to employees generally vest as follows: 50% after two years and the remaining 50% after three years or upon a grantee of such stock options attaining the age 65. The stock options awarded in 2017 have a contractual term of ten years and are subject to forfeiture should the recipient terminate his or her employment with the Company for certain reasons prior to vesting in his or her awards, or the occurrence of certain other events, such as termination with cause. The exercise price of these stock options is based on the average market price of our common stock on the date of grant ($22.20 for the 2017 awards described above) and compensation expense is recorded on an accelerated basis over the awards’ vesting periods.

The weighted average fair value of the stock options granted in March 2017 and 2016 was $7.79 and $3.79, respectively. The fair value was calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model based on the market price at the grant date and the weighted average assumptions specific to the underlying options. The expected term used by the Company is based on the historical average life of stock option awards.  The expected volatility assumption is based on the volatility of our common stock from the same time period as the expected term of the stock options. The risk-free interest rate was selected based upon yields of U.S. Treasury issues with a term similar to the expected life of the stock options. The expected dividend yield is calculated as the annual dividend per share amount divided by the average market price of the common stock on the date of the grant.

The assumptions utilized for calculating the fair value of stock options during the period are as follows:

The following table summarizes stock options amounts and activity:

For the three and nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016, cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options totaled $0.4$0.5 million and $0.8$0.2 million, respectively.  No options were exercised in the three months ended September 30, 2015.  For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options totaled $0.8 million.

Restricted Stock

Restricted stock units for executive officers and certain employees are restricted as to transferability until they generally vest three years from the grant date or upon a grantee of such restricted stock units attaining the age 65. Restricted stock units for directors are restricted as to transferability until they generally vest one year from the grant date or upon a grantee of such restricted stock units attaining the age of 65.  These restricted stock units are subject to forfeiture should applicable employees terminate their employment with the Company for certain reasons prior to vesting in their awards, or the occurrence of certain other events. The value of these restricted stock units is based on the average market price of our common stock on the date of grant and compensation expense is recorded on a straight-line basis over the awards’ vesting periods.

The following table summarizes unvested restricted stock units amounts and activity:

11.                               Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Claims

We are from time to time subject to various administrative and legal investigations, claims and proceedings incidental to our business, including environmental and occupational, health and safety matters, labor and employment matters, personal injury and property damage claims, contractual, commercial and other disputes and taxes. We establish reserves for claims and proceedings when it is probable that liabilities exist and where reasonable estimates can be made. We also maintain insurance that may limit our financial exposure for defense costs, as well as liability, if any, for claims covered by the insurance (subject also to deductibles and self-insurance amounts). While any investigation, claim or proceeding has an element of uncertainty, and we cannot predict or assure the outcome of any claim or proceeding involving the Company, we believe the outcome of any pending or threatened claim or proceeding (other than those that cannot be assessed due to their preliminary nature), or all of them combined, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

The Company’s subsidiary, Longview Fibre Paper and Packaging, Inc. (“Longview”), is a potentially responsible party under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) with respect to the Lower Duwamish

Waterway Superfund Site in the State of Washington (the “Site”). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) asserts that the Site is contaminated as a result of discharges from various businesses and government entities located along the Lower Duwamish Waterway, including a corrugated converting plant owned and operated by Longview. In November 2014, the EPA issued a

Record of Decision (“ROD”) for the Site. The ROD includes a selected remedy for the Site. In the ROD, EPA states that the total estimated net present value costs (discounted at 2.3%) for the selected remedy are $342 million. Neither the Company nor Longview has received a specific monetary demand regarding its potential liability for the Site. In addition, Longview is a participant in a non-judicial allocation process with respect to the Site. Pursuant to the non-judicial allocation process, Longview and other participating parties will seek to allocate certain costs, including but not limited to the costs necessary to perform the work under the ROD. The non-judicial allocation process is not scheduled to be completed until 2019. Based upon the information available to the Company at this time, the Company cannot reasonably estimate its potential liability for this Site.

In October 2016, the Company’s subsidiary KapStone Charleston Kraft LLC (“KCK”) received a Notice of Alleged Violation from the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (“DHEC”) in which DHEC made several allegations related to air regulatory requirements. Several of the allegations related to recordkeeping/reporting, monitoring or paperwork requirements which did not implicate actual emissions (and which have been corrected); however, three of the allegations related to periodic compliance monitoring of particulates from operating equipment sources that are considered to be serious under DHEC guidelines. No emissions from the monitoring resulted in any impact to the environment or human health, and no annual limits were exceeded because this allegation involved spare equipment that is operated only a limited number of days each year. Discussions with DHEC regarding the alleged violations are ongoing, and the resolution of the matters raised in this notice is uncertain at this time (and therefore the Company cannot reasonably estimate its potential liability for this enforcement matter). However, no capital expenditure is required and all repairs and corrective actions have been performed resulting in full compliance as of March 31, 2017; thus the Company currently does not expect that the result of those discussions will be material to the our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In January 2017, the Company received a letter from the state of Washington Department of Ecology contending that the Company may, along with several other companies, be responsible for investigation and cleanup of an allegedly contaminated site where the named companies, including Longview, may store or have stored petroleum products. The letter concerns the possible release of petroleum products into the environment. In 1998, Longview (before it was acquired by the Company) and certain other companies who owned or operated underground storage tanks and pipes entered into an agreement for investigating and remediating the area independently of (but in consultation with) the Washington Department of Ecology. Upon expiration of the 1998 agreement, groundwater monitoring continued. The Company plans to respond to the notice and further investigate the allegations in the letter. Based upon the information available to the Company at this time, the Company cannot reasonably estimate its potential liability, if any, for this site.

There have been no material changes in any of our legal proceedings for the ninethree months ended September 30, 2016.March 31, 2017.

Contingent Consideration

The Company’s contingent consideration obligation relates to the acquisition of Victory acquisition that was consummatedPackaging, L.P. (“Victory”) on June 1, 2015 and is considered a Level 3 liability. The fair value of the obligation as of September 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 20152016 was $17.9$17.4 million and $13.3$14.9 million, respectively. The fair value of the contingent consideration is driven byestimated based on the probability of reaching the performance measures through December 1, 2017 required by the purchase agreement and the associated discount rate.November 30, 2017. The probability is estimated by reviewing financial forecasts and assessing the likelihood of reaching the required performance measures based on factors specific to the acquisition. The discount rate is determined by applying a risk premium to a risk-free interest rate. The total potential payout under this obligation is $25.0 million.  The Company expects to payout this obligation in the first quarter of 2018.

12.                               Segment Information

Paper and Packaging:  This segment manufactures and sells a wide variety of container board, corrugated products and specialty paper for industrial and consumer markets.

Distribution: Through Victory, a North American distributor of packaging materials, with more than 60 distribution centers located in the United States, Mexico and Canada, the Company provides packaging materials and related products to a wide variety of customers.

Each segment’s profits and losses are measured on operating profits before income from equity investments, foreign exchange gains / (losses), loss on debt extinguishment, net interest expense and income taxes.