UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x☒

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, ~~2017~~2022

o☐

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-14066

SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

~~SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION~~

~~(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)~~

Delaware		13-3849074
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

~~1440 East Missouri Avenue~~7310 North 16th St, Suite ~~160~~135 Phoenix, AZ		~~85014~~85020
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: ~~(602)~~ (602) 264-1375

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class:

Trading Symbol

Name of each exchange on which registered:

Common stock, par value $0.01 per share

SCCO

New York Stock Exchange

Lima Stock Exchange

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x⌧ No o☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Website, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes x⌧ No o◻

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

	Large accelerated filerx	☒	Accelerated filero	☐
~~Non-accelerated filer~~ o	Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting companyo	☐
	Emerging growth companyo	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o☐ No x⌧

As of October ~~27, 2017~~31, 2022 there were outstanding ~~773,028,469~~773,098,469 shares of Southern Copper Corporation common stock, par value $0.01 per share.

Table of Contents

Southern Copper Corporation (“SCC”)

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q


				Page No.
Part I. Financial ~~Information:~~Information:

Item 1.		Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)		3

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021		3

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021		4

		Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and December 31, ~~2016~~2021		5

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021		6

		Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021		7

		Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	~~7-29~~	8-37

Item 2.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	~~30-47~~	38-59

Item 3.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk	~~48-49~~	60-61

Item 4.		Controls and procedures	50	62

		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	51	63

Part II. Other ~~Information:~~Information:

Item 1.	~~Legal Proceedings~~	52Legal Proceedings		64

Item 1A.	~~Risk Factors~~	52Risk Factors		64

Item 2.		Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	52	65

Item 4.		Mine Safety Disclosures	52	65

Item 6.	~~Exhibits~~	~~53-55~~List of Exhibits		66-69

	~~Signatures~~	56

Signatures	~~List of Exhibits~~	~~57-59~~

~~Exhibit 15~~	~~Independent Accountants’ Awareness Letter~~

~~Exhibit 31.1~~	~~Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~

~~Exhibit 31.2~~	~~Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~

~~Exhibit 32.1~~	~~Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~

~~Exhibit 32.2~~	~~Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002~~	70

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

Southern Copper Corporation

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EARNINGS

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

(in millions, except per share amounts)

Net sales (including sales to related parties, see Note 7)

$
1,676.5

$
1,400.7

$
4,790.2

$
3,980.8

Operating costs and expenses:

Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion shown separately below)

781.5

831.4

2,430.2

2,309.9

Selling, general and administrative

25.0

22.7

68.6

72.5

Depreciation, amortization and depletion

169.3

174.5

493.8

474.3

Exploration

8.1

9.7

18.9

30.4

Environmental remediation

—

—

(10.2
)
—

Total operating costs and expenses

983.9

1,038.3

3,001.3

2,887.1

Operating income

692.6

362.4

1,788.9

1,093.7

Interest expense

(90.3
)
(91.5
)
(285.1
)
(270.9
)
Capitalized interest

18.7

18.4

49.7

50.8

Other income (expense)

(6.2
)
9.6

1.6

14.9

Interest income

1.8

1.8

4.0

6.0

Income before income taxes

616.6

300.7

1,559.1

894.5

Income taxes (including royalty taxes, see Note 4)

220.1

111.2

556.6

305.4

Net income before equity earnings of affiliate

396.5

189.5

1,002.5

589.1

Equity earnings of affiliate, net of income tax

6.3

8.7

16.1

17.4

Net income

402.8

198.2

1,018.6

606.5

Less: Net income attributable to the non-controlling interest

1.0

0.6

2.6

1.9

Net income attributable to SCC

$
401.8

$
197.6

$
1,016.0

$
604.6

Per common share amounts attributable to SCC:

Net earnings - basic and diluted

$
0.52

$
0.26

$
1.31

$
0.78

Dividends paid

$
0.14

$
0.05

$
0.34

$
0.13

Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted

773.0

773.6

773.0

773.7


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,

	2022		2021		2022		2021

	(in millions, except for per share amounts)
Net sales (including sales to related parties, see note 5)	$	2,156.9	$	2,680.9	$	7,227.6	$	8,110.4
Operating cost and expenses:
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion shown separately below)		1,137.9		927.5		3,442.3		2,856.8
Selling, general and administrative		30.2		31.3		91.4		92.9
Depreciation, amortization and depletion		192.0		203.4		597.6		599.4
Exploration		9.6		10.9		30.6		26.7
Total operating costs and expenses		1,369.7		1,173.1		4,161.9		3,575.8

Operating income		787.2		1,507.8		3,065.7		4,534.6

Interest expense		(96.7)		(96.7)		(291.8)		(290.0)
Capitalized interest		12.5		7.8		34.6		22.2
Other income (expense)		38.7		(1.9)		54.4		(7.8)
Interest income		7.8		1.5		16.7		5.2
Income before income taxes		749.5		1,418.5		2,879.6		4,264.2
Income taxes (including royalty taxes, see Note 4)		228.5		548.6		1,137.0		1,703.8
Net income before equity earnings of affiliate		521.0		869.9		1,742.6		2,560.4
Equity earnings (loss) of affiliate, net of income tax		(0.1)		1.3		0.3		14.4
Net income		520.9		871.2		1,742.9		2,574.8
Less: Net income attributable to the non-controlling interest		1.9		3.6		6.8		10.6
Net income attributable to SCC	$	519.0	$	867.6	$	1,736.1	$	2,564.2

Per common share amounts attributable to SCC:
Net earnings-basic and diluted	$	0.67	$	1.12	$	2.25	$	3.32

Weighted average shares outstanding-basic and diluted		773.1		773.1		773.1		773.1

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Southern Copper Corporation

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(Unaudited)

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

(in millions)

Net income and comprehensive income

$
402.8

$
198.2

$
1,018.6

$
606.5

Comprehensive income attributable to the non-controlling interest

1.0

0.6

2.6

1.9

Comprehensive income attributable to SCC

$
401.8

$
197.6

$
1,016.0

$
604.6


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021

	(in millions)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
Net income and comprehensive income	$	520.9	$	871.2	$	1,742.9	$	2,574.8
Other comprehensive income (loss) net of tax:
- Unrealized gain on derivative instruments classified as cash flow hedge (net of income tax of $0.2 million in 2022 and $2.7 million in 2021)		—		6.4		(0.6)		6.4
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		—		6.4		(0.6)		6.4
Total comprehensive income		520.9		877.6		1,742.3		2,581.2
Comprehensive income attributable to the non-controlling interest		1.9		3.6		6.8		10.6
Comprehensive income attributable to SCC	$	519.0	$	874.0	$	1,735.5	$	2,570.6

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Southern Copper Corporation

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

September 30,

December 31,

2017

2016

(in millions)

ASSETS

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$
798.5

$
546.0

Restricted cash

—

3.6

Short-term investments

30.5

51.3

Accounts receivable trade

830.3

591.9

Accounts receivable other (including related parties 2017 - $76.0 and 2016 - $23.4)

146.5

76.6

Inventories

997.4

1,010.4

Prepaid taxes

122.6

249.4

Other current assets

26.6

36.9

Total current assets

2,952.4

2,566.1

Property and mine development, net

8,928.3

8,766.5

Ore stockpiles on leach pads

940.5

806.9

Intangible assets, net

147.0

154.2

Deferred income tax

773.3

727.3

Equity method investment

95.8

87.5

Other assets

145.1

125.8

Total assets

$
13,982.4

$
13,234.3

LIABILITIES

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable (including related parties 2017 - $83.1 and 2016 - $62.2)

$
565.1

$
584.2

Accrued income taxes

118.3

185.1

Accrued workers’ participation

130.7

125.4

Accrued interest

133.1

85.6

Other accrued liabilities

32.6

18.7

Total current liabilities

979.8

999.0

Long-term debt

5,956.3

5,954.2

Deferred income taxes

155.1

162.6

Other liabilities and reserves

35.5

31.1

Asset retirement obligation

225.6

216.5

Total non-current liabilities

6,372.5

6,364.4

Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common stock

8.8

8.8

Additional paid-in capital

3,368.5

3,358.2

Retained earnings

6,211.3

5,455.3

Accumulated other comprehensive income

(2.4
)
(2.4
)
Treasury stock, at cost, common shares

(2,996.7
)
(2,987.6
)
Total Southern Copper Corporation stockholders’ equity

6,589.5

5,832.3

Non-controlling interest

40.6

38.6

Total equity

6,630.1

5,870.9

Total liabilities and equity

$
13,982.4

$
13.234.3

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements~~.

~~Southern Copper Corporation~~

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS~~


		September 30,		December 31,
		2022		2021

		(in millions)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	2,184.5	$	3,002.0
Short-term investments			0.3		486.9
Accounts receivable trade			1,065.8		1,358.7
Accounts receivable other (including related parties 2022- $48.1 and 2021 - $49.1)			88.9		87.9
Inventories			1,053.3		972.9
Prepaid taxes			541.6		197.7
Other current assets			24.9		33.5
Total current assets			4,959.3		6,139.6

Property and mine development, net			9,554.5		9,464.4
Ore stockpiles on leach pads			1,075.1		1,097.6
Intangible assets, net			137.2		138.1
Right-of-use assets			869.7		916.3
Deferred income tax			245.7		316.2
Equity method investment			115.7		115.4
Other non-current assets			126.0		110.0
Total assets		$	17,083.2	$	18,297.6

LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Current portion of long-term debt		$	300.0	$	299.7
Accounts payable (including related parties 2022- $161.1 and 2021- $103.3)			662.6		591.9
Accrued income taxes			94.7		832.6
Accrued workers’ participation			178.5		325.7
Accrued interest			131.2		98.6
Lease liabilities current			76.9		73.9
Other accrued liabilities			40.9		27.6
Total current liabilities			1,484.8		2,250.0

Long-term debt			6,250.3		6,247.9
Lease liabilities			792.8		842.4
Deferred income taxes			132.2		118.3
Non-current taxes payable			75.4		—
Other liabilities and reserves			98.9		68.3
Asset retirement obligation			620.8		562.9
Total non-current liabilities			7,970.4		7,839.8

Commitments and contingencies (Note 10)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (NOTE 11)
Common stock par value $0.01; shares authorized, 2022 and 2021–2,000; shares issued, 2022 and 2021–884.6			8.8		8.8
Additional paid-in capital			3,477.9		3,454.1
Retained earnings			7,186.5		7,769.7
Accumulated other comprehensive income	��		(10.1)		(9.4)
Treasury stock, at cost, common shares			(3,096.3)		(3,074.0)
Total Southern Copper Corporation stockholders’ equity			7,566.8		8,149.2
Non-controlling interest			61.2		58.6
Total equity			7,628.0		8,207.8
Total liabilities and equity		$	17,083.2	$	18,297.6

~~(Unaudited)~~

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 30,

September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

(in millions)

OPERATING ACTIVITIES

Net income

$
402.8

$
198.2

$
1,018.6

$
606.5

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided from operating activities:

Depreciation, amortization and depletion

169.3

174.5

493.8

474.3

Equity earnings of affiliate, net of dividends received

(4.3
)
(5.3
)
(8.3
)
(7.5
)
(Gain) loss on foreign currency transaction effect

(2.0
)
1.6

50.8

(6.5
)
Benefit (provision) for deferred income taxes

(20.9
)
(77.1
)
(61.7
)
(130.9
)
Other, net

3.6

7.6

11.2

21.4

Change in operating assets and liabilities:

Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable

(210.1
)
(86.5
)
(238.3
)
(115.0
)
Decrease (increase) in inventories

(72.3
)
(3.4
)
(120.5
)
(149.7
)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

113.9

153.1

(9.5
)
53.6

Decrease (increase) in other operating assets and liabilities

56.1

(55.6
)
143.9

(110.3
)
Net cash provided by operating activities

436.1

307.1

1,280.0

635.9

INVESTING ACTIVITIES

Capital investments

(212.7
)
(275.6
)
(710.4
)
(840.5
)
Proceeds from sale (purchase) of short-term investments, net

9.6

(2.6
)
20.8

502.7

Loan repaid by related parties

—

74.8

—

111.2

Sale of property

(0.1
)
1.3

1.0

2.6

Net cash used in investing activities

(203.2
)
(202.1
)
(688.6
)
(224.0
)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES

Cash dividends paid to common stockholders

(108.2
)
(38.7
)
(262.8
)
(100.6
)
Repurchase of common shares

—

(18.0
)
—

(71.7
)
Other

(0.2
)
—

0.1

0.3

Net cash used in financing activities

(108.4
)
(56.7
)
(262.7
)
(172.0
)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

(14.7
)
10.7

(76.2
)
(2.9
)

Increase in cash and cash equivalents

109.8

59.0

252.5

237.0

Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period

688.7

452.5

546.0

274.5

Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period

$
798.5

$
511.5

$
798.5

$
511.5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Southern Copper Corporation

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021

	(in millions)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	520.9	$	871.2	$	1,742.9	$	2,574.8
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided from operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and depletion		192.0		203.4		597.6		599.4
Equity earnings of affiliate, net of dividends received		0.1		2.8		(0.3)		(6.3)
Loss (gain) on foreign currency transaction effect		0.2		(36.6)		52.0		(50.0)
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes		52.6		(103.3)		84.5		(100.1)
Other, net		8.1		5.1		25.5		16.9
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase)/decrease in accounts receivable		(1.2)		(57.7)		292.9		(424.5)
Decrease/ (increase) in inventories		30.9		(9.5)		(57.9)		(8.3)
(Decrease)/ increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(24.9)		332.3		(768.6)		409.5
(Increase) / decrease in other operating assets and liabilities		(188.6)		12.9		(248.0)		53.3
Net cash provided by operating activities		590.1		1,220.6		1,720.6		3,064.7
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures		(227.9)		(243.1)		(657.6)		(695.5)
Proceeds from (purchase) sale of short-term investments, net		242.3		(81.0)		486.6		(216.0)
Other		—		9.9		—		(0.6)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		14.4		(314.2)		(171.0)		(912.1)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Cash dividends paid to common stockholders		(579.8)		(695.8)		(2,319.3)		(1,700.8)
Other, net		(0.3)		(1.6)		(4.0)		(4.3)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(580.1)		(697.4)		(2,323.3)		(1,705.1)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		47.0		(19.6)		(43.8)		(47.4)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		71.4		189.4		(817.5)		400.1
Cash and cash equivalents, at beginning of period		2,113.1		2,394.3		3,002.0		2,183.6
Cash and cash equivalents, at end of period	$	2,184.5	$	2,583.7	$	2,184.5	$	2,583.7

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Southern Copper Corporation

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021

	(in millions)
TOTAL EQUITY, beginning of period	$	7,687.0	$	7,972.8	$	8,207.8	$	7,276.0
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY, beginning of period		7,627.3		7,917.5		8,149.2		7,224.8
CAPITAL STOCK:
Balance at beginning and end of period:		8.8		8.8		8.8		8.8
ADDITIONAL PAID-IN CAPITAL:
Balance at beginning of period		3,472.7		3,454.9		3,454.1		3,441.5
Other activity of the period		5.2		5.3		23.8		18.7
Balance at end of period		3,477.9		3,460.2		3,477.9		3,460.2
TREASURY STOCK:
Southern Copper common shares
Balance at beginning of the period		(2,767.1)		(2,767.4)		(2,767.2)		(2,767.5)
Used for corporate purposes		0.1				0.2		0.1
Balance at end of period		(2,767.0)		(2,767.4)		(2,767.0)		(2,767.4)
Parent Company common shares
Balance at beginning of period		(324.4)		(308.4)		(306.8)		(296.0)
Other activity, including dividend, interest and foreign currency transaction effect		(4.9)		(5.0)		(22.5)		(17.4)
Balance at end of period		(329.3)		(313.4)		(329.3)		(313.4)
Treasury stock balance at end of period		(3,096.3)		(3,080.8)		(3,096.3)		(3,080.8)
RETAINED EARNINGS:
Balance at beginning of period		7,247.3		7,538.0		7,769.7		6,846.4
Net earnings		519.0		867.6		1,736.1		2,564.2
Dividends declared and paid, common stock, per share, 2022- '$3.00, 2021– '$2.20		(579.8)		(695.8)		(2,319.3)		(1,700.8)
Balance at end of period		7,186.5		7,709.8		7,186.5		7,709.8
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS):
Balance at beginning of period		(10.1)		(8.4)		(9.4)		(8.4)
Other comprehensive income (loss)		—		6.4		(0.6)		6.4
Balance at end of period		(10.1)		(2.0)		(10.1)		(2.0)
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY, end of period		7,566.8		8,096.0		7,566.8		8,096.0
NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST, beginning of period		59.8		55.3		58.6		51.2
Net earnings		1.9		3.6		6.8		10.6
Distributions paid		(0.5)		(1.5)		(4.2)		(4.4)
NON-CONTROLLING INTEREST, end of period		61.2		57.4		61.2		57.4
TOTAL EQUITY, end of period	$	7,628.0	$	8,153.4	$	7,628.0	$	8,153.4

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Southern Copper Corporation

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

NOTE ~~1 —~~1— DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS:

The Company is a majority-owned, indirect subsidiary of Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C.V. (“Grupo Mexico”). AtAs of September 30, ~~2017,~~2022, Grupo Mexico, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Americas Mining Corporation (“AMC”) owned 88.9% of the Company’s capital stock. The condensed consolidated financial statements presented herein consist of the accounts of Southern Copper Corporation (“~~SCC”~~Southern Copper”, "SCC" or the “Company”), a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries. The Company is an integrated producer of copper and other minerals, and operates mining, smelting and refining facilities in Peru and Mexico. The Company conducts its primary operations in Peru through a registered branch (the ~~“Peruvian Branch”~~"Peruvian Branch" or “Branch” or “SPCC Peru Branch”). The Peruvian Branch is not a corporation separate from the Company. The ~~Company’s~~Company's Mexican operations are conducted through subsidiaries. The Company also conducts exploration activities in Argentina, Chile, Ecuador, Mexico and Peru.

In the opinion of the Company, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to fairly state ~~fairly~~ the Company’s financial position as of September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and the results of operations, comprehensive income, ~~and~~ cash flows and changes in equity for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016.~~2021. The results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. The December 31, ~~2016~~2021 balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements at December 31, ~~2016~~2021 and notes included in the Company’s ~~2016~~2021 annual report on Form 10-K.

NOTE 2 — SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS:

Short-term investments were as follows ~~($ in~~(in millions):


	At September 30,			At December 31,
	2022			2021
Trading securities	$	—		$	486.5
Weighted average interest rate		—	%		0.3	%

Available-for-sale	$	0.3		$	0.4
Weighted average interest rate		0.8	%		0.7	%
Total	$	0.3		$	486.9

At September 30,

At December 31,

2017

2016

Trading securities

$
29.5

$
49.2

Weighted average interest rate

1.4
%
2.2
%

Available-for-sale

$
1.0

$
2.1

Weighted average interest rate

0.70
%
0.78
%
Total

$
30.5

$
51.3

Trading securities ~~consist~~consisted of bonds issued by public companies and ~~are~~were publicly traded. Each financial instrument iswas independent of the others. The Company ~~has~~had the intention to sell these bonds in the short-term.

Available-for-sale investments consist of securities issued by public companies. Each security is independent of the others and atas of September 30, ~~2017~~2022, and December 31, ~~2016,~~2021, included ~~corporate bonds and~~ asset and mortgage backed obligations. As of September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and December 31, ~~2016,~~2021, gross unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities were not material.

~~Related~~The Company earned interest related to these investments, ~~the Company earned interest,~~ which was recorded as interest income in the condensed consolidated statement of earnings. Also, the Company redeemed some of these securities and recognized gains (losses) due to changes in fair value, which were recorded as other income (expense) in the condensed consolidated statement of earnings.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the activity of these investments by category (in millions):

Three months ended

Nine months ended

September 30,

September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Trading securities:

Interest earned

$
0.2

$
0.3

$
0.6

$
1.0

Unrealized gain (loss) at the end of the period

$
0.1

$
0.3

$
0.1

$
0.3

Available-for-sale:

Interest earned

(*
)
(*
)
(*
)
(*
)
Investment redeemed

$
0.1

$
0.3

$
1.1

$
0.8


	Three months ended				Nine months ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2022		2021		2022		2021
Trading:
Interest earned	$	3.3	$	0.6	$	3.9	$	1.3
Unrealized gain (loss) at the end of the period	$	(*)	$	(*)	$	(*)	$	(*)

Available-for-sale:
Interest earned		(*)		(*)		(*)		(*)
Investment redeemed	$	—	$	0.1	$	0.1	$	0.2

(*) Less than $0.1 million.

NOTE 3 -— INVENTORIES:

Inventories were as follows:


					At September 30,		At December 31,
(in millions)	At September 30, 2017		At December 31, 2016		2022		2021
Inventory, current:
Metals at average cost:
Finished goods	$	46.6	$	130.5	$	79.7	$	58.6
Work-in-process	274.0		231.6			376.7		340.7
Ore stockpiles on leach pads	317.0		310.9			256.5		259.7
Supplies at average cost:	359.8		337.4
Supplies at average cost						340.4		313.9
Total current inventory	$	997.4	$	1,010.4	$	1,053.3	$	972.9

Inventory, non-current:
Inventory, long-term:
Ore stockpiles on leach pads	$	940.5	$	806.9	$	1,075.1	$	1,097.6

During the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021, total leaching costs capitalized as non-current inventory of ore stockpiles on leach pads amounted to ~~$386.4~~$192.7 million and ~~$329.4~~$184.2 million, respectively. Leaching inventories recognized in cost of sales amounted to ~~$246.7~~$218.4 million and ~~$234.1~~$205.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016,~~2021 respectively.

NOTE 4 — INCOME TAXES:

The income tax provision and the effective income tax rate for the ~~nine months of 2017~~nine-month periods ended September 30, 2022 and ~~2016~~2021 consisted of (in millions):


	2022			2021
Statutory income tax provision	$	972.7		$	1,387.0
Peruvian royalty		24.7			70.1
Mexican royalty		97.9			162.5
Peruvian special mining tax		41.7			84.2
Total income tax provision	$	1,137.0		$	1,703.8

Effective income tax rate		39.5	%		40.0	%

2017

2016

Statutory income tax provision

$
473.0

$
268.5

Peruvian royalty

0.5

—

Mexican royalty

67.7

29.4

Peruvian special mining tax

15.4

7.5

Total income tax provision

$
556.6

$
305.4

Effective income tax rate

35.7
%
34.1
%

These provisions include income taxes for Peru, Mexico and the United States. ~~In addition, a~~The Mexican royalty, ~~tax, a portion of~~ the Peruvian royalty ~~tax~~ and the Peruvian special mining tax are included in the income tax provision. The ~~increase~~decrease in the effective income tax rate ~~for the 2017 period from~~in 2022 compared to the same period in 2021 was primarily attributable to the matching of ~~2016 is primarily due to an increase in expected dividends from our Mexican subsidiaries.~~

~~The Company’s Unrecognized Tax Benefits (UTB) are expected to change~~account balances in the ~~fourth quarter~~Peruvian jurisdiction.

Table of 2017. The change is estimated to be $153 million and it is not expected to have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements because most of this change will be offset by corresponding adjustments to deferred tax balances. The UTB change is caused by the filing in early October 2017 of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Form 3115 (Application for Change in Accounting Method) by theContents

~~Company’s parent Americas Mining Corporation. The change is voluntary and is considered an automatic change pursuant to the guidelines published by the IRS.~~

~~Peruvian income tax rate:~~ In December 2016, the Peruvian Government enacted income tax law changes to both the income tax and dividend tax rate that became effective on January 1, 2017. The 2016 rates and the new rates are as follows:

Year

Income Tax Rate

Dividend Tax Rate

2016

28.0
%
6.8
%
2017 and later

29.5
%
5
%

Peruvian royalty and special mining tax: The mining royalty charge is based on operating income margins with graduated rates ranging from 1% to 12% of operating profits, with a minimum royalty charge assessed at 1% of net sales. If the operating income margin is 10% or less, the royalty charge is 1% and for each 5% increment in the operating income margin, the royalty charge rate increases by 0.75%, up to a maximum of 12%. The minimum royalty charge assessed at 1% of net sales is recorded as cost of sales and those amounts assessed against operating income are included in the income tax provision. The Company has accrued ~~$15.4~~$66.4 million and ~~$12.2~~$154.3 million of royalty charge ~~in the nine months of 2017~~ and ~~2016, respectively, of which $0.5 million was included in income taxes in 2017; no amounts were included in income tax in the nine months of 2016.~~

The special mining tax is based on operating income and its rate ranges from 2% to 8.4%. It begins at 2% for operating income margin up to 10% and increases by 0.4% of operating income for each addittoional 5% of operating income until 85% of operating income is reached. ~~The Company has accrued $15.4 million and $7.5 million of~~ special mining tax as part of the income tax provision for the first nine months of ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016,~~2021, respectively.

Mexican mining royalty: Mexico has a mining royalty charge of 7.5% on earnings before taxes as defined by Mexican tax regulations and an additional royalty charge of 0.5% over gross income from sales of gold, silver and platinum. The Company has accrued ~~$67.7~~$97.9 million and ~~$29.4~~$162.5 million of royalty taxes as part of the income tax provision for the first nine months of ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016,~~2021, respectively.

Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes: In the ~~third quarter and~~first nine months of ~~2017, there were no changes in the Company’s uncertain tax positions.~~

~~NOTE 5 — PROVISIONALLY PRICED SALES:~~

~~At September 30, 2017,~~2022, the Company ~~has~~received a refund and recorded ~~provisionally priced sales~~a current liability and non-current liability for the Peruvian jurisdiction that increased the tax expense by approximately $58.0 million.

Tax Law Changes: On December 28, 2021, the U.S. Treasury and the IRS released final regulations addressing various aspects of ~~copper at average forward prices per pound,~~the foreign tax credit regime. The regulations apply to years beginning after December 28, 2021 and ~~molybdenum at the September, 2017 market price per pound. These sales~~they are ~~subject~~not expected to final pricing based on the average monthly London Metal Exchange (“LME”), or New York Commodities Exchange (“COMEX”), copper prices and Dealer Oxide molybdenum prices in the future month of settlement.

~~Following are the provisionally priced copper and molybdenum sales outstanding at September 30, 2017:~~

Sales volume
(million lbs.)

Priced at
(per pound)

Month of settlement

Copper

52.5

$
2.94

From October 2017 to December 2017

Molybdenum

10.6

$
8.33

From October 2017 to December 2017

The provisional sales price adjustment included in accounts receivable and net sales at September 30, 2017 includes positive adjustments of $0.7 million and $3.9 million for copper and molybdenum, respectively.

~~Management believes that the final pricing of these sales will not~~ have a material ~~effect~~impact on the Company’s financial ~~position~~statements.

NOTE 5 — RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:

The Company has entered into certain transactions in the ordinary course of business with parties that are controlling shareholders or ~~results~~their affiliates. These transactions include the lease of ~~operations.~~office space, air and railroad transportation, construction services, energy supply, and other products and services related to mining and refining. The Company lends and borrows funds among affiliates for acquisitions and other corporate purposes. These financial transactions bear interest and are subject to review and approval by senior management, as are all related party transactions. Article Nine of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company prohibits the Company from engaging in a Material Affiliate Transaction that was not the subject of prior review by a committee of the Board of Directors with at least three members, each of whom is independent, and defines a Material Affiliate Transaction as a transaction or series of related transactions between Grupo Mexico or one of its affiliates (other than the Company or its subsidiaries), on the one hand, and the Company or one of its subsidiaries, on the other hand, that involves consideration of more than $10.0 million in the aggregate. It is the Company’s policy that (i) a Material Affiliate Transaction not be entered into or continued without the review and approval by the Audit Committee or its subcommittee of related party transactions comprised of independent directors,(ii) any potential related party transaction process with aggregate consideration between $8.0 million and $10.0 million be authorized by the General Counsel and Chief Financial Officer of the Company and (iii) that all related party transactions, including any Material Affiliate Transaction, be reported to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors or to its subcommittee of related party transactions.

Table of Contents

Receivable and payable balances with related parties are shown below (in millions):


	At September 30,		At December 31,
	2022		2021
Related parties receivable current:
Grupo Mexico and affiliates:
Asarco LLC	$	6.9	$	10.0
Americas Mining Corporation (“AMC”)		—		0.1
AMMINCO Apoyo Administrativo, S.A. de C.V. (“AMMINCO”)		(*)		—
Compania Perforadora Mexico S.A.P.I. de C.V. and affiliates		0.3		0.3
Ferrocarril Mexicano, S.A. de C.V.		(*)		—
Mexico Generadora de Energia S. de R.L. ("MGE")		40.3		38.4
Grupo Mexico Servicios de Ingenieria, S.A. de C.V.		0.2		0.2
Related to the controlling group:
Boutique Bowling de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.		0.1		0.1
Mexico Transportes Aereos, S.A. de C.V. ("Mextransport")		0.2		—
Operadora de Cinemas, S.A. de C.V.		0.1		(*)
	$	48.1	$	49.1

Related parties payable:
Grupo Mexico and affiliates:
AMMINCO Apoyo Administrativo, S.A. de C.V. (“AMMINCO”)	$	8.7	$	9.5
Asarco LLC		32.5		14.9
Eolica El Retiro, S.A.P.I. de C.V.		0.3		2.7
Ferrocarril Mexicano, S.A. de C.V.		24.5		4.0
Grupo Mexico Servicios		18.6		11.1
Grupo Mexico Servicios de Ingenieria, S.A. de C.V.		2.0		0.9
MGE		68.8		57.2
Mexico Compania Constructora S.A de C.V.		5.0		2.0
Related to the controlling group:
Boutique Bowling de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.		0.3		0.3
Mextransport		0.3		0.5
Operadora de Cinemas, S.A. de C.V.		0.1		0.2
	$	161.1	$	103.3

(*) Less than $0.1 million.

Table of Contents

Purchase and sale activity:

Grupo Mexico and affiliates:

The following table summarizes the purchase and sale activities with Grupo Mexico and its affiliates in the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 (in millions):


	2022		2021
Purchase activity
Asarco LLC	$	51.9	$	23.0
AMMINCO		6.7		—
Controladora de Infraestructura Energetica S.A. de C.V		0.8		—
Eolica El Retiro, S.A.P.I. de C.V.		2.5		6.2
Ferrocarril Mexicano, S.A. de C.V.		32.5		33.1
Grupo Mexico Servicios		15.1		21.9
Intermodal Mexico S.A. de C.V.		—		0.5
MGE		250.8		209.0
Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollos S.A. de C.V. and affiliates		38.9		43.8
Peru Mining Exploration & Development Company		—		0.4
Total purchases	$	399.2	$	337.9
Sales activity
Asarco LLC	$	32.2	$	22.8
AMMINCO		(*)		—
Grupo Mexico Servicios		—		0.1
Ferrocarril Mexicano, S.A. de C.V.		(*)		—
MGE		133.6		92.3
Total sales	$	165.8	$	115.2

(*) Less than $0.1 million.

Grupo Mexico, the parent and the majority indirect stockholder of the Company, and its affiliates provide various services to the Company. These services are primarily related to accounting, legal, tax, financial, treasury, human resources, price risk assessment and hedging, purchasing, procurement and logistics, sales and administrative and other support services. The Company pays AMMINCO and Grupo Mexico Servicios, subsidiaries of Grupo Mexico, for these services and expects to continue requiring these services in the future.

In the first nine months of 2022, the Company donated $2.6 million to Fundacion Grupo Mexico, A.C., an organization dedicated to promoting the social and economic development of the communities close to the Company’s Mexican operations. In the same period of 2021, the Company made donations of $1.3 million to this organization.

The Company’s Mexican operations paid fees for freight services provided by Ferrocarril Mexicano, S.A. de C.V., which is a subsidiary of Grupo Mexico. Additionally, the Company´s Mexican operations paid fees for specialized technical and environmental services to obtain the energy license for El Arco project provided by Controladora de Infraestructura Energetica S.A. de C.V., a subsidiary of Infraestructura y Transportes Mexico S.A. de C.V., which is a subsidiary of Grupo Mexico.

The Company´s Peruvian and Mexican operations paid fees for engineering services provided by Grupo Mexico Servicios de Ingenieria, S.A. de C.V., and the Company’s Mexican operations paid fees for construction services provided by Mexico Compania Constructora S.A. de C.V. Both companies are subsidiaries of Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollos, S.A. de C.V., which is a subsidiary of Grupo Mexico.

The Company’s Mexican operations purchased copper concentrates and rod from Asarco LLC and also paid fees for tolling services, as well as reimbursement of freight fees. Additionally, the Company´s Mexican operations purchased power from MGE. Both companies are subsidiaries of Grupo Mexico.

Table of Contents

In 2012, the Company signed a power purchase agreement with MGE, whereby MGE will supply some of the Company’s Mexican operations with power through 2032. MGE has two natural gas-fired combined cycle power generating units, with a net total capacity of 516.2 megawatts and has been supplying power to the Company since December 2013. Currently, MGE is supplying 1.8% of its power output to third-party energy users, compared to 2.7% as of September 30, 2021.

In 2014, Mexico Generadora de Energia Eolica, S. de R.L. de C.V, an indirect subsidiary of Grupo Mexico, located in Oaxaca, Mexico, acquired Eolica el Retiro. Eolica el Retiro is a windfarm with 37 wind turbines. This company started operations in January 2014 and began to sell power to Industrial Minera Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and subsidiaries (IMMSA) and other subsidiaries of Grupo Mexico in the third quarter of 2014. Currently, Eolica el Retiro supplies approximately 32.5% of its power output to IMMSA and Mexcobre, compared to 61.0% as of September 30, 2021.

The Company sold copper concentrate, lime and sulfuric acid to Asarco LLC. The Company also received fees for natural gas and services provided to MGE, a subsidiary of Grupo Mexico.

Companies with relationships to the controlling group:

The following table summarizes the purchase and sales activities with other Larrea family companies in the first nine months of 2022 and 2021 (in millions):


	2022		2021
Purchase activity
Boutique Bowling de Mexico S.A. de C.V.	$	0.2	$	0.2
Mextransport		1.6		1.1
Operadora de Cinemas S.A. de C.V.		0.1		0.1
Total purchases	$	1.9	$	1.4

Sales activity
Boutique Bowling de Mexico S.A. de C.V.	$	0.1	$	(*)
Mextransport		1.4		1.4
Operadora de Cinemas S.A. de C.V.		0.1		(*)
Total sales	$	1.6	$	1.4

(*) amount is lower than $0.1 million

The Larrea family controls a majority of the capital stock of Grupo Mexico and has extensive interests in other businesses, including transportation, real estate and entertainment. The Company engages in certain transactions in the ordinary course of business with other entities controlled by the Larrea family relating to the lease of office space, air transportation and entertainment.

The Company’s Mexican operations paid fees for entertainment services provided by Boutique Bowling de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and Operadora de Cinemas, S.A. de C.V. Both companies are controlled by the Larrea family. Mextransport provides aviation services to the Company´s Mexican operations. This is a company controlled by the Larrea family.

In addition, the Company received fees for building rental and maintenance provided to Boutique Bowling de Mexico, S.A. de C.V. and Operadora de Cinemas, S.A. de C.V. The Company´s Mexican operations received fees from Mextransport for reimbursement of maintenance expenses and for rental services.

Equity Investment in Affiliate: The Company has a 44.2% participation in Compania Minera Coimolache S.A. (“Coimolache”), which it accounts for on the equity method. Coimolache owns Tantahuatay, a gold mine located in the northern part of Peru.

In addition, the Company has a 30.0% participation in Apu Coropuna S.R.L. (“Apu Coropuna”), which it accounts for on the equity method. Apu Coropuna is a company that performs exploration activities in the Pucay prospect, located in Arequipa, Peru.

Table of Contents

It is anticipated that in the future the Company will enter into similar transactions with these same parties.

NOTE 6 -— DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS:

From time to time, the Company uses derivative instruments to manage its cash flows exposure to changes in commodity prices. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts unless it anticipates that the possibility exists that future activity will expose the Company’s future cash flows to deterioration. Derivative contracts for commodities are entered into to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of the commodities that the Company uses in its manufacturing process.

Cash Flow Hedges of Natural Gas

The Company’s objective in using natural gas derivatives is to protect the stability of natural gas costs and manage exposure to natural gas price increases. To protect natural gas costs from estimated price increases in the past winter season, the Company acquired two derivative instruments that began in November 2021 and ended in March 2022.

The Company assessed these derivative instruments as Cash Flow Hedges. As such, the effective portions of said hedges were initially reported in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) and were reclassified as earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affected earnings. The Company did not identify any ineffective portions of these derivatives.

As of September 30, 2022 and 2021, the Company did held no derivative instruments.

NOTE 7 — LEASES:

The Company has operating leases for power generating facilities, vehicles and properties. The Company recognizes leasing expenses for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Some of the Company’s leases include both lease and non-lease components which are accounted for separately. The Company’s leases have remaining lease terms of one year to 11 years, and do not include options to extend the leases. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain options to purchase the leased assets or to terminate the leases before the expiration date. In addition, the Company’s lease contracts have no material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. As none of the Company’s leases stipulates an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments.

The weighted average remaining lease term for the Company’s leases is eight years, and the weighted average discount rate for these leases is 3.77%.

The operating lease expense recognized in the first nine months of 2022 and 2021 was classified as follows (in millions):


Classification	2022		2021
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)	$	86.5	$	85.8
Selling, general and administrative		0.1		0.1
Exploration		0.1		0.1
Total lease expense	$	86.7	$	86.0

Table of Contents

Maturities of lease liabilities are as follows:


	Lease liabilities
Year	(in millions)
2022	$	28.9
2023		115.2
2024		107.3
2025		106.2
2026		106.0
After 2026		628.8
Total lease payments	$	1,092.4
Less: interest on lease liabilities		(222.7)
Present value of lease payments	$	869.7

NOTE 8 — ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATION:

Peruvian operations:

The Company maintains an asset retirement obligation for its mining properties in Peru, as required by the Peruvian Mine Closure Law. In accordance with the requirements of this law, the Company’s closure plans were approved by the Peruvian Ministry of Energy and Mines (“MINEM”). As part of the closure plans, the Company is required to provide annual guarantees over the estimated life of the mines, based on a present value approach, and to furnish the funds for the asset retirement obligation. This

law requires a review of closing plans every five ~~years. Currently and~~years.

On June 24, 2019, MINEM approved a change to the guarantees required for the ~~near-term future,~~mining closure plans. The new regulation specifies that annual guarantees can be secured with real estate up to a maximum of 50% and the remaining amount with credit instruments. Currently, the Company has pledged the value of its Lima office complex for the 50% of the guarantee and with a stand-by letter of credit for the other 50% as ~~support~~a security for this obligation. ~~The accepted value of the Lima office building, for this purpose, is $30.8 million.~~ Through ~~September 2017,~~January 2022, the Company has provided total guarantees of ~~$26.9~~$66.3 million.

On July 20, 2021, the Peruvian Government published Law 31347, which requires companies in the production stage to set aside additional guarantees for progressive closure of its operations. The resources that back these guarantees will be returned to the Company when activities cease and the regulatory agency verifies that all closure measures have been satisfactorily completed. Under this Law, companies must include activities for environmental remediation within the closure schedule and assume costs associated with environmental impacts that are identified during audits. As of June 30, 2022, the regulation attached to this Law had yet to be published. The Company is currently evaluating the possible financial impact of the Law but cannot fully estimate the magnitude until the Law’s regulation is published.

The closure cost recognized for this liability includes the cost, as outlined in its closure plans, of dismantling the Toquepala and Cuajone concentrators, the Ilo smelter and refinery, and the shops and auxiliary facilities at the three units.

In ~~2010,~~March 2016, MINEM approved the ~~Company announced to~~Mining Closure Plan for the ~~Mexican federal environmental authorities its~~Toquepala expansion project and the revised closure plans for the ~~copper smelter plant at San Luis Potosi.~~Cuajone mine and the Ilo facilities were approved in January and October 2019, respectively. Based on these new estimates, the Company increased the asset retirement obligation by $28.1 million in 2019. The closure plan for the Tia Maria project was approved in February 2017. However, the Company has not recorded a retirement obligation for the Tia Maria project because work on the project is still on hold. The Company ~~initiated a program for plant demolition and soil remediation with a budget of $66.2 million, which has been spent through September 30, 2017. Plant demolition and construction~~believes that under these circumstances, the recording of a ~~confinement area at~~retirement obligation is not appropriate.

Mexican operations:

The Company has recognized an estimated asset retirement obligation for its mining properties in Mexico as part of its environmental commitment. Even though there is currently no enacted law, statute, ordinance, written or oral contract requiring the ~~south of~~Company to carry out mine closure and environmental remediation activities, the ~~property were completed in 2012. In accordance with remediation goals previously approved by environmental authorities, soil remediation and on-site encapsulation~~Company believes that a constructive obligation presently exists based on ~~a second confinement area of impacted soils have been completed. Confirmation sampling was successfully completed. On September 2, 2016, the environmental authorities approved the conclusion of~~ the remediation ~~effort for San Luis Potosi.~~requirements caused by the closure of any facility. The ~~Company continues studying the possibilities for this property in order to decide whether to sell or develop the property. The~~

Table of Contents

overall cost recognized for mining closure in Mexico includes the estimated costs of dismantling concentrators, smelter and refinery plants, shops and other facilities.

In ~~2016,~~the first quarter of 2022, the Company ~~added $9.5 million related~~adjusted its estimate for the asset retirement obligation for its Mexican operations following a detailed review of the closing activities required. The effect was an increase in the asset retirement obligation to the ~~Quebalix IV closure plan, a project that is part~~order of ~~the Buenavista expansion.~~$43.3 million.

The following table summarizes the asset retirement obligation activity for the first nine months ~~ended September 30, 2017~~of 2022 and ~~2016~~2021 (in millions):


	2022		2021
Balance as of January 1	$	562.9	$	545.0
Changes in estimates		43.3		—
Closure payments		(4.9)		(3.7)
Accretion expense		19.5		18.3
Balance as of September 30,	$	620.8	$	559.6

2017

2016

Balance as of January 1

$
216.5

$
190.9

Changes in estimates

—

—

Payments

(0.3
)
(1.7
)
Accretion expense

9.4

21.2

Balance as of September 30,

$
225.6

$
210.4

NOTE 7 9 — ~~RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:~~ BENEFIT PLANS:

The Company has entered into certain transactions in the ordinary course of business with parties that are controlling shareholders or their affiliates. These transactions include the lease of office space, air transportation and construction services and products and services related to mining and refining. The Company lends and borrows funds among affiliates for acquisitions and other corporate purposes. These financial transactions bear interest and are subject to review and approval by senior management, as are all related party transactions. It is the Company’s policy that the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors shall review all related party transactions. The Company is prohibited from entering or continuing a material related party transaction that has not been reviewed and approved or ratified by the Audit Committee.

~~Receivable and payable balances with related parties are shown below (in millions):~~

At September 30,
2017

At December 31,
2016

Related parties receivable current:

Grupo Mexico and affiliates:

Asarco LLC

$
38.5

$
5.5

Mexico Generadora de Energia S. de R.L. (“MGE”)

31.6

10.2

Grupo Mexico

2.8

4.5

Compania Perforadora Mexico S.A.P.I. de C.V. and affiliates

1.4

1.3

Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollos, S.A. de C.V. and affiliates

1.2

1.5

Operadora de Generadoras de Energia Mexico S.A. de C.V.

—

0.1

Related to the controlling group:

Operadora de Cinemas S.A. de C.V.

0.3

0.2

Boutique Bowling de Mexico S.A. de C.V.

0.2

0.1

$
76.0

$
23.4

At September 30,
2017

At December 31,
2016

Related parties payable:

Grupo Mexico and affiliates:

MGE

$
44.5

$
13.9

Asarco LLC

23.5

36.3

Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollos, S.A. de C.V. and affiliates

9.1

7.8

Ferrocarril Mexicano S.A. de C.V.

4.1

3.0

Grupo Mexico

0.7

0.1

Eolica El Retiro, S.A.P.I. de C.V.

0.1

0.1

Related to the controlling group:

Boutique Bowling de Mexico S.A. de C.V.

0.4

0.2

Mexico Transportes Aereos S.A. de C.V. (“Mextransport”)

0.1

0.1

Operadora de Cinemas S.A. de C.V.

0.6

0.4

Related to SCC executive officers:

Breaker S.A. de C.V. and affiliates (“Breaker”)

—

0.3

$
83.1

$
62.2

~~Purchase and sale activity:~~

~~Grupo Mexico and affiliates:~~

Grupo Mexico, the parent and the majority indirect stockholder of the Company, and its affiliates provide various services to the Company. These services are primarily related to accounting, legal, tax, financial, treasury, human resources, price risk assessment and hedging, purchasing, procurement and logistics, sales and administrative and other support services. The Company pays Grupo Mexico for these services and expects to continue requiring these services in the future.

~~The following table summarizes the purchase and sale activities with Grupo Mexico and its affiliates in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in millions):~~

2017

2016

Purchase activity

Asarco LLC

$
29.6

$
26.9

Eolica El Retiro, S.A.P.I. de C.V.

2.4

0.8

Ferrocarril Mexicano S.A de C.V.

34.2

33.9

Grupo Mexico

10.5

15.0

MGE

168.5

171.3

Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollos, S.A. de C.V. and affiliates

92.8

47.1

Total purchases

$
338.0

$
295.0

Sales activity

Asarco LLC

$
94.1

$
37.0

Compania Perforadora Mexico S.A.P.I. de C.V and affiliates

0.2

0.5

Grupo Mexico

0.1

0.6

MGE

77.8

72.6

Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollos, S.A. de C.V. and affiliates

—

0.3

Total sales

$
172.2

$
111.0

In the nine month period of 2017, the Company made donations of $1.9 million to Fundacion Grupo Mexico, an organization dedicated to promoting the social and economic development of the communities close to the Company’s Mexican operations.

The Company’s Mexican operations paid fees for freight services provided by Ferrocarril Mexicano S.A de C.V., and for construction services provided by Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollo S.A. de C.V. and its affiliates. All of these companies are subsidiaries of Grupo Mexico.

~~The Company’s Mexican operations purchased scrap and other residual copper mineral from Asarco LLC, and power from MGE. Both companies are subsidiaries of Grupo Mexico.~~

In 2005, the Company organized MGE, as a subsidiary of Minera Mexico, for the construction of two power plants to supply power to the Company’s Mexican operations. In May 2010, the Company’s Mexican operations granted a $350 million line of credit to MGE for the construction of the power plants. That line of credit was due on December 31, 2012 and carried an

interest rate of 4.4%. In the first quarter of 2012, Controladora de Infraestructura Energetica Mexico, S. A. de C. V., an indirect subsidiary of Grupo Mexico, acquired 99.999% of MGE through a capital subscription of 1,928.6 million of Mexican pesos (approximately $150 million), reducing Minera Mexico’s participation to less than 0.001%. As consequence of this change in control, MGE became an indirect subsidiary of Grupo Mexico. Additionally, at the same time, MGE paid $150 million to the Company’s Mexican operations partially reducing the total debt. The remaining balance was restructured as subordinated debt of MGE. In the third quarter of 2016, MGE repaid the outstanding balance of the debt. ~~Related to this loan, the Company recorded interest income of $4.2 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016.~~

In 2012, the Company signed a power purchase agreement with MGE, whereby MGE will supply some of the Company’s Mexican operations with power through 2032. MGE completed construction of its first power plant in June 2013 and the second plant, in the second quarter of 2014. These plants are natural gas-fired combined cycle power generating units, with a net total capacity of 516.2 megawatts. The first plant began supplying power to the Company in December 2013, and the second plant began to supply power in June 2015. MGE is supplying 14% of its power output to third-party energy users.

~~On August 4, 2014, Mexico Generadora de Energia Eolica S. de R.L. de C.V, an indirect subsidiary of Grupo Mexico, located in Oaxaca, Mexico, acquired Eolica el Retiro.~~ Eolica el Retiro is a windfarm that has 37 wind turbines. This company started operations in January 2014 and started to sell power to IMMSA and other subsidiaries of Grupo Mexico in the third quarter of 2014. Eolica el Retiro is supplying approximately 27% of its power output to IMMSA.

The Company sold copper cathodes, rod and anodes, as well as sulfuric acid, silver, gold and lime to Asarco LLC. In addition, the Company received fees for building rental and maintenance services provided to Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollos, S.A. de C.V. and its affiliates and to Compania Perforadora Mexico S.A.P.I. de C.V., and for natural gas and services provided to MGE; all subsidiaries of Grupo Mexico.

~~Companies with relationships to the controlling group:~~

~~The following table summarizes the purchase and sales activities with other Larrea family companies in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in millions):~~

2017

2016

Purchase activity

Boutique Bowling de Mexico S.A. de C.V.

$
0.2

$
0.3

Mextransport

0.4

1.5

Operadora de Cinemas S.A. de C.V.

0.1

0.5

Total purchases

$
0.7

$
2.3

Sales activity

Boutique Bowling de Mexico S.A. de C.V.

$
0.2

$
0.2

Mextransport

0.3

0.4

Operadora de Cinemas S.A. de C.V.

0.1

0.1

Total sales

$
0.6

$
0.7

The Larrea family controls a majority of the capital stock of Grupo Mexico, and has extensive interests in other businesses, including transportation, real estate and entertainment. The Company engages in certain transactions in the ordinary course of business with other entities controlled by the Larrea family relating to the lease of office space, air transportation and entertainment.

The Company’s Mexican operations paid fees for entertainment services provided by Boutique Bowling de Mexico S.A de C.V. and Operadora de Cinemas S.A. de C.V. Both companies are controlled by the Larrea family.

MexTransport provides aviation services to the Company’s Mexican operations. In addition, the Company received fees for building rental provided to Mextransport. This is a company controlled by the Larrea family.

~~In addition, the Company received fees for building rental and maintenance provided to Boutique Bowling de Mexico S.A. de C.V., and Operadora de Cinemas S.A. de C.V.~~

~~Companies with relationships to SCC executive officers:~~

~~The following table summarizes the purchase activities with companies with relationships to SCC executive officers in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 (in millions):~~

2017

2016

Breaker

$
—

$
0.5

Higher Technology S.A.C.

—

1.0

Pigoba S.A. de C.V.

—

0.1

Servicios y Fabricaciones Mecanicas S.A.C.

0.2

0.4

Total purchases

$
0.2

$
2.0

~~(*) amount is lower than $0.1 million~~

In 2016, the Company purchased industrial materials from Breaker S.A. de C.V., Breaker Peru S.A.C., and Pigoba S.A. de C.V. in which the SCC´s Chief Executive Officer´s sons, Carlos Gonzalez and Alejandro Gonzalez; and son-in-law, Jorge Gonzalez, have a proprietary interest. Also, the Company purchased industrial material to Higher Technology S.A.C. and paid fees for maintenance services provided by Servicios y Fabricaciones Mecanicas S.A.C. Companies in which Carlos Gonzalez son of SCC´s Chief Executive Officer had a proprietary interest through June 6, 2016.

~~Equity Investment in Affiliate:~~ The Company has a 44.2% participation in Compania Minera Coimolache S.A. (“Coimolache”), which it accounts for on the equity method. Coimolache owns Tantahuatay, a gold mine located in the northern part of Peru.

~~It is anticipated that in the future the Company will enter into similar transactions with these same parties.~~

~~NOTE 8 — BENEFIT PLANS:~~

Post retirement defined benefit plans:

The Company has two ~~noncontributory~~non-contributory defined benefit pension plans ~~covering~~to cover former salaried employees in the United States and certain former expatriate employees in Peru. Effective October 31, 2000, the Board of Directors amended the qualified pension plan to suspend the accrual of benefits.

In addition, the Company’s Mexican subsidiaries have a defined contribution pension plan for salaried employees and a non-contributory defined benefit pension plan for union employees.

The components of net periodic benefit costs for the ~~nine months~~nine-month periods ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021 are as follows (in millions):

	2017			2016

(in millions)							2022		2021
Service cost	$	0.6		$	0.6		$	1.3	$	1.1
Interest cost	1.1			0.7				1.7		1.2
Expected return on plan assets	(2.3		)	(1.8		)		(2.9)		(2.6)
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)	0.1			0.1
Amortization of net loss	0.2			0.2
Net periodic benefit costs	$	(0.3	)	$	(0.2	)
Amortization of prior service cost / (credit)								0.1		0.1
Amortization of net loss/(gain)								0.3		0.2
Net periodic benefit cost							$	0.5	$	(0.0)

~~(*) amount is lower than $0.1 million~~

Post-retirement ~~Health~~health care plans:

United States: The Company adopted a post-retirement health care plan for retired salaried employees eligible for Medicare in 1996. The Company manages the plan and is currently providing health benefits to retirees. The plan is accounted for in accordance with ASC 715 “Compensation retirement benefits”. As of December 31, 2021, because there has been a significant reduction in participants and in the amount of liability, the Company considered that this plan was not material enough to run a valuation.

In Mexico, health services are provided by the Mexican Social Security Institute.

The components of net periodic benefit cost for the ~~nine months~~nine-month periods ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021 are as follows (in millions):

	2017			2016

(in millions)							2022		2021
Interest cost	$	0.7		$	0.4		$	1.2	$	1.3
Amortization of net loss (gain)	(0.1		)	(0.3		)		0.1		0.1
Amortization of prior service cost (credit)	(*		)	(*		)
Amortization of prior service cost/ (credit)								(*)		(*)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	0.6		$	0.1		$	1.3	$	1.4

~~(*) amount is lower than $0.1 million~~Table of Contents

NOTE 910 — COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:

Environmental matters:

The Company has ~~instituted extensive~~established comprehensive environmental conservation programs at its mining facilities in Peru and Mexico. The Company’s environmental programs include, ~~among others,~~ water recovery systems to conserve water and minimize the impact on nearby streams, reforestation programs to stabilize the surface of the tailings dams and the implementation of scrubbing technology in the mines to reduce dust ~~emissions.~~emissions, among others.

Environmental capital investments in the ~~nine months~~nine-month periods ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021 were as follows (in millions):


	2022		2021
Peruvian operations	$	7.1	$	2.9
Mexican operations		35.4		57.7
	$	42.5	$	60.6

2017

2016

Peruvian operations

$
60.5

$
58.7

Mexican operations

95.1

101.2

$
155.6

$
159.9

Peruvian operations: The Company’s operations are subject to applicable Peruvian environmental laws and regulations. The Peruvian government, through the Ministry of Environment (“MINAM”) conducts annual audits of the Company’s Peruvian mining and metallurgical operations. Through these environmental audits, matters related to environmental ~~obligation,~~obligations, compliance with legal requirements, atmospheric emissions, effluent monitoring and waste management are reviewed. The Company believes that it is in material compliance with applicable Peruvian environmental laws and regulations. Peruvian law requires that companies in the mining industry provide assurances for future mine closure and remediation. In accordance with the requirements of this law, the Company’s closure plans were approved by MINEM. See Note 68 “Asset retirement ~~obligation,”~~obligation” for further discussion of this matter. In accordance with the requirements of the law, in 2015 the Company submitted the closure plans for the Tia Maria project and for the Toquepala expansion. The process of review and approval of closure plans usually takes several months. In March 2016, MINEM approved the Mining Closure Plan for the Toquepala expansion project. The closure plan for the Tia Maria project was approved in February 2017. The Company, however, has not recorded a retirement obligation for the project as the construction permit has not been received, and work on the project is on hold. The Company believes that under these circumstances the recording of a retirement obligation is not appropriate.

~~In 2008, the Peruvian government enacted environmental regulations establishing stringent air quality standards~~Air Quality Standards (“AQS”) for daily sulfur dioxide (“SO2”) in the air for the Peruvian territory. These regulations, as amended in 2013, recognized distinct zones/areas, as atmospheric basins. MINAM had established three atmospheric basins that required further attention to comply with the air quality standards. The Ilo basin was one of these three areas and the Company’s smelter and refinery are part of the area.

:In June 2017, MINAM enacted a supreme decree ~~which defines~~that defined new AQS for daily sulfur dioxide ~~and gaseous mercury for~~in the Peruvian territory, as well as monthly lead in particulate matter (PM10), in order to adopt standards similar to comparable countries and conform them to the technical capabilities available in Peru, while ensuring the protectionair. As of public health. This decree also considers criteria established by the World Health Organization and establishes a mean 24-hour AQS equal to 250 micrograms per cubic meter (µg/m3) of SO2 to replace the current 24-hour AQS of 20 µg/m3 of SO2, effective since 2014. The decree also establishes a mean 24-hour AQS equal to 2 µg/m3 of gaseous mercury and a mean monthly AQS equal to 1.5 µg/m3 of lead in PM10.

The Company believes that these new AQS are appropriate for Peru and will allow Peruvian industry to be competitive with other countries. The Company has evaluated the potential impact of these new standards and expects that its adoption will not have a

~~material impact on the financial position of the Company, as currently~~September 30, 2022, the Company maintains a ~~significantly lower~~ daily average level of µg/m3 of SO2, lower than those required by the new AQS.

In addition, in June 2017, MINAM enacted a supreme decree which establishes new quality standards for water in the Peruvian territory. The Company has reviewed this decree and considers that its adoption will not have a material impact on its financial position.

Soil Environmental Quality Standards (“SQS”): In 2013, the Peruvian government enacted ~~soil environmental quality standards~~Soil Quality Standards. In accordance with the regulatory requirements of the law, the Company prepared Soil Decontamination Plans (“~~SQS”~~SDP”) for environmentally impacted sites at each of its operation units (Toquepala, Cuajone and Ilo) with the assistance of consulting companies. The costs of these SDPs are not material, either individually or in aggregated form, for the financial statements of the Company.

Climate change:On April 17, 2018, the Peruvian government enacted Law N. 30754, establishing a Climate Change Framework. This law establishes that it is in the national interest to promote public and private investments in climate change management. The law proposes creating an institutional framework to address climate change in Peru, and outlines new measures, particularly with respect to climate change mitigation. For example, it includes provisions addressing an increase in carbon capture and use of carbon sinks, afforestation and reforestation practices; land use changes; and sustainable systems of transportation, solid waste management, and energy systems. This is the first Latin American climate change framework law to incorporate obligations from the Paris Agreement. Regulations to this law were enacted by Supreme Decree 013-2019 published on December 31, 2019, and are applicable to ~~any existing facility or project~~all Peruvian institutions and agencies. It is expected that generates or could generate the risk of soil contamination in its area of operation or influence. In March 2014, MINAM issued a supreme decree, which establishes additional provisions for the gradual implementation of SQS. Under this rule the Company had twelve monthsfurther Peruvian regulations will be applicable to ~~identify contaminated sites in and around its facilities and present a report of identified contaminated sites. These documents were submitted~~non-governmental entities. However, no carbon pricing mechanism is currently applicable to ~~MINEM for approval in April 2015. After MINEM’s review, the documents for~~ the Company’s operations ~~were fully approved~~ in July 2017. The next step is for the Company to prepare a characterization study to determine the depth, extent and physio-chemical composition of the contaminated areas and define an appropriate remediation plan and the time-frame for completion. In addition, the Company must submit for approval a Soil Decontamination Plan (SDP) within 30 months after being notified by the authority. This SDP must include remediation actions, a schedule and compliance deadlines. Also under this rule, if deemed necessary and given reasonable justification, the Company may request a one year extension for the decontamination plan.Peru.

Soil confirmation tests must be carried out after completion of decontamination actions (within the approved schedule) and results must be presented to authorities within 30 days after receiving such results. Non-compliance with this obligation or with decontamination goals will carry penalties, although no specific sanctions have been established yet. During compliance with this schedule, companies cannot be penalized for non-compliance with the SQS.

While the Company believes that there is a reasonable possibility that a potential loss contingency may exist, it cannot currently estimate the amount of the contingency. The Company believes that a reasonable determination of the loss will be possible once the characterization study and the SDP are substantially completed, which is expected for the first quarter of 2020. At that time the Company will be in a position to estimate the remediation cost. Further, the Company does not believe that it can estimate a reasonable range of possible costs until the noted studies have substantially progressed and therefore is not be able to disclose a range of costs that is meaningful.

Mexican operations: The Company’s operations are subject to applicable Mexican federal, state and municipal environmental laws, to Mexican official standards, and to regulations for the protection of the environment, including regulations relating to water supply, water quality, air quality, noise levels and hazardous and solid waste.

The principal legislation applicable to the Company’s Mexican operations is the Federal General Law of Ecological Balance and Environmental Protection (the “General Law”), which is enforced by the Federal Bureau of Environmental Protection (“PROFEPA”). PROFEPA monitors compliance with environmental legislation and enforces Mexican environmental laws, regulations and official standards. It may also initiate administrative proceedings against companies

Table of Contents

that violate environmental laws, which in the most extreme cases may result in the temporary or permanent shutdown of non-complying facilities, the revocation of operating licenses and/or other sanctions or fines.

In 2011, the General Law was amended ~~giving~~to provide an individual or entity the ability to ~~contest~~challenge administrative acts, including environmental authorizations, permits or concessions granted, without the need to demonstrate the actual existence of harm to the environment as long as it can be argued that the harm may be caused. ~~In addition, in 2011,~~Additionally, amendments to the Civil Federal Procedures Code (“CFPC”) were ~~enacted. These amendments establish~~ enacted in 2011 and established three categories of collective actions ~~by means~~under which a group of ~~which~~ 30 or more ~~people claiming injury derived from~~individuals may be considered sufficient to prove a “legitimate interest” to file civil actions for injuries arising out of alleged violations of environmental, consumer protection, financial services and economic competition ~~issues will be considered to be sufficient in order to have a legitimate interest to~~laws. The group can seek ~~through a civil procedure~~ restitution or economic compensation for the alleged injuries or suspension of the activities ~~from~~ which allegedly caused the ~~alleged injury derived.~~injuries in question. The amendments to the CFPC may result in more litigation, with plaintiffs seeking remedies, including suspension of the activities alleged to cause harm.

In 2013, the Environmental Liability Federal Law was enacted. ~~The~~This law establishes general guidelines for actions to be considered likely to ~~likely~~ cause environmental harm. If a possible determination regarding harm occurs, environmental clean-up and remedial actions sufficient to restore environment to a pre-existing condition should be taken. ~~Under this law, if~~If restoration is not possible, compensation measures ~~should~~must be provided. Criminal penalties and monetary fines ~~can~~may be imposed under this law.

On February 2019, the Mexican Supreme Court confirmed the constitutionality of an ecological tax on extractive activities conducted in the state of Zacatecas, which taxes environmental remediation actions, emissions of certain gases to the atmosphere, emissions of polluting substances to the soil or water, and waste storage within the state. The Company has determined that this new environmental regulation will have no impact on its financial position.

Guaymas sulfuric acid spill: On July 9, 2019, there was an incident at the Company´s Marine Terminal in Guaymas, Sonora, that caused the discharge of approximately three cubic meters of sulfuric acid into the sea in the industrial port area.

The Guaymas bay has an estimated water volume of 340 million cubic meters. The spill, upon entering in contact with the sea’s alkaline conditions, led to quick dilution of the discharge. Thus, the sulfuric acid was naturally and immediately neutralized. As a result, the discharge was considered harmless; the report from the Ministry of Navy found that neither the flora nor fauna of the port area were affected.

On July 10, 2019, PROFEPA made a first inspection of the area, concluding that the Company executed all the appropiate procedures in order to contain the discharge, and no reference was made to the existence of negative impacts on the environment resulting from the incident.

On Friday, July 19, 2019, PROFEPA revisited the facilities to carry out a second inspection and declared a partial temporary shutdown that only affected the storage process and transportation of sulfuric acid at the terminal, arguing the absence of an authorization of environmental impact. It is important to note that these facilities have been in operation since 1979, prior to the 1988 Mexican General Law of Ecological Balance and the Protection of the Environment. Companies that were operating before the aforementioned law are exempt from the permit requirement. In addition, in 2009, PROFEPA awarded a certification of “Clean Industry and Environmental Quality” to the facility which was subsequently renewed four times (for a two-year period each time).

The Company filed a lawsuit against the closure, which was dismissed by a ruling on August 25, 2021. This ruling has been challenged through a motion to reopen the case, which was submitted on September 28, 2021. On January 4, 2022, the challenge was resolved. The authority imposed two fines and ruled that the temporary closure would remain in place until the environmental impact statement is obtained. The Company intends to appeal this ruling.

The Company is not aware of the reasons or causes for this partial and temporary closure, but will continue working with the environmental authorities to provide assurance that the operation is in strict compliance with environmental regulations. The Company expects the environmental authorities to suspend the partial temporary shutdown, once their

Table of Contents

concerns are resolved. Currently, the Company does not expect any impact on its operations. As of September 30, 2022, the matter is pending resolution.

Climate change: Several taxes are applicable to the Company’s mining operations in Mexico, including federal and state fossil fuel taxes, and the requirements associated with Mexico’s emission trading scheme. These taxes range from $2.5/tCO2 to $12.5/tCO2, approximately. These refer to regional taxes applicable in the States of Baja California and Zacatecas, as well as a federal tax linked to Mexico’s carbon market system which is currently in its pilot phase. The requirements associated with this scheme are currently applicable only to two business units, the metallurgic and lime plants in Sonora, which generate annual GHG emissions levels above the threshold of 100,000 tCO2e per year contemplated by the scheme. These business units are required to report and verify their emissions once a year with average costs of less than $6,000 per unit. Units that emit more than 25,000 tonnes CO2 equivalent per year (all our Mexican units) are required to report their emissions to the National Emissions Registry (RENE) every year and to verify the reported emissions every three years. As a result, the Company’s total annual compliance costs related to climate change regulations in Mexico were not material to the Company.

The Company has also been participating in Mexico’s “GHG Program” since its inception in 2005, which is a voluntary initiative for the registry and reporting of greenhouse gases emissions.

The Company believes that all of its facilities in Peru and Mexico are in material compliance with environmental, mining and other applicable laws and regulations. The Company also believes that continued compliance with environmental laws of Mexico and Peru will have no material adverse effects on the Company’s business, properties, or operating results.

Litigation matters:

Peruvian operations:

The Tia Maria Mining Project

There are six lawsuits filed against the Peruvian Branch of the Company related to the Tia Maria project. The lawsuits seek (i) to declare null and void the resolution that approved the Environmental Impact Assessment of the project; (ii) the cancellation of the project and the withdrawal of mining activities in the area; (iii) to declare null and void the mining concession application for the Tia Maria project; and (iv) to declare null and void the resolution that approved the construction license. The lawsuits were filed by Messrs. Jorge Isaac del Carpio Lazo (filed May 22, 2015 – the judgment ruled in favor of SPCC), Ernesto Mendoza Padilla (filed May 26, 2015), Juan Alberto Guillen Lopez (filed June 18, 2015), Junta de Usuarios del Valle del Tambo (filed April 30, 2015), Gobierno Regional de Arequipa (filed December 16, 2019) and Municipalidad Distrital de Dean Valdivia (filed in January 2020 but notified in August 2022).

The Mendoza Padilla case was initially rejected by the lower court on July 8, 2015. This ruling was confirmed by the Superior Court on June 14, 2016. On July 12, 2016, the case was appealed before the Constitutional Court. On November 20, 2018, the Constitutional Court reversed the previous decisions and remanded the case to the lower court for further action. In the third quarter of 2020, the Company was notified that the complaint had been reinstated. The Company answered the complaint on September 15, 2020. On December 2, 2020, the lower court issued a resolution, considering the complaint answered. On September 27, 2021, the Court ordered to temporarily archive the case. As of September 30, 2022, the case remains pending resolution.

The Guillen Lopez case is currently before the lower court. Oral arguments took place on July 19, 2019,. On January 7, 2020, the Judge decided to suspend the proceeding until the del Carpio Lazo case is concluded. On March 3, 2022, SCC’s Peruvian Branch informed the Court that the del Carpio Lazo case had concluded. As of September 30, 2022, the case remains pending resolution.

The Junta de Usuarios del Valle del Tambo case is currently before the lower court. In May 2016, the Company was included in the process, after the Ministry of Energy and Mines filed a civil complaint. On March 6, 2019, the Company was formally notified of the lawsuit and answered the complaint on March 20, 2019. On July 8, 2019, the Company

Table of Contents

requested the suspension of the proceeding until the del Carpio Lazo case is concluded. On March 3, 2022, SCC’s Peruvian Branch informed the Court that the del Carpio Lazo case had concluded. As of September 30, 2022, the case remains pending resolution.

The Gobierno Regional de Arequipa case is currently before the lower court. The Company answered the complaint on September 15, 2020. On February 8, 2021, the Judge decided to suspend the proceeding until the del Carpio Lazo case is concluded. On March 24, 2022, SCC’s Peruvian Branch informed the Court that the del Carpio Lazo case had concluded. On March 28, 2022, the Judge cancelled the suspension. On May 24, 2022, the parties presented their closing arguments and as of September 30, 2022, the case remains pending resolution.

The Municipalidad Distrital de Dean Valdivia case is currently before the lower court. On August 17, 2022, the Company was formally notified of the lawsuit and answered the complaint on September 2, 2022. As of September 30, 2022, the case remains pending resolution.

The Company asserts that these lawsuits are without merit and is vigorously defending against them. The potential contingency amount for these cases cannot be reasonably estimated by management at this time.

Special Regional Pasto Grande Project (“Pasto Grande Project”)

In 2012, the Pasto Grande Project, an entity of the Regional Government of Moquegua, filed a lawsuit against SCC’s Peruvian Branch alleging property rights over a certain area used by the Peruvian Branch and seeking the demolition of the tailings dam where SCC’s Peruvian Branch has deposited its tailings from the Toquepala and Cuajone operations since 1995. The Peruvian Branch has had title to use the area in question since 1960 and has, since 1995, constructed and operated the tailings dams with proper governmental authorization. Following a motion filed by the Peruvian Branch, the lower court included MINEM as a defendant in this lawsuit. MINEM has answered the complaint and denied the validity of the claim. As of September 30, 2022, the case was pending resolution without further developments.

SCC’s Peruvian Branch asserts that the lawsuit is without merit and is vigorously defending against it. The amount of this contingency cannot be reasonably estimated by management at this time.

Mexican operations:

The Accidental Spill at Buenavista Mine of 2014 an

In relation to the 2014 accidental spill ~~of approximately 40,000 cubic meters~~ of copper sulfate solution ~~occurred~~ at a leaching pond in the Buenavista mine, ~~leaching pond. This solution reached~~ the ~~Bacanuchi River and~~following legal procedures are pending against the ~~Sonora River. The Company took immediate actions to contain the spill, and to comply with all necessary legal requirements. The Company hired contractors including environmental~~

~~specialists and assigned more than 1,200 of its own personnel to clean the river. In addition, the Company developed a service program to assist the residents of the Sonora River region.~~Company:

The National Water Commission, the Federal Commission for the Protection of Sanitary Risk and PROFEPA initiated administrative proceedings regarding the spill to determine possible environmental and health damages. On August 19, 2014, PROFEPA, as part of the administrative proceeding initiated after the spill, announced the filing of a criminal complaint against Buenavista del Cobre S.A. de C.V. (“BVC”), a subsidiary of the Company, in order to determine those responsible for ~~the~~ environmental damages. ~~The Company is vigorously defending itself against this complaint. As~~During the second quarter of 2018, the criminal complaint was dismissed. This decision was appealed and was pending resolution as of September 30, ~~2017, the case remains in the procedural stages and is pending resolution.~~2022.

On September 15, 2014, the Company executed an administrative agreement with PROFEPA, providing for the submission of a remediation action plan to the Mexican Ministry of Environment and Natural Resources (Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales “SEMARNAT”). The general remediation program submitted to SEMARNAT was approved on January 6, 2015.

The Company also created a trust with a Mexican development bank, acting as a Trustee to support environmental remedial actions in connection with the spill, to comply with the remedial action plan and to compensate those persons adversely affected by the spill. The Company committed up to two billion Mexican pesos (approximately $150 million). A technical committee for the trust was created with representatives from the federal government, the Company and specialists assisted by a team of environmental experts to ensure the proper use of the funds. Along with the administrative agreement executed with PROFEPA, the trust served as an alternative mechanism for dispute resolution to mitigate public and private litigation risks.

On December 1, 2016, SEMARNAT issued its final resolution which held that all remediation actions contained in the Remediation Plan, as approved by the same authority, had been fully fulfilled and that all requirements had been complied with, except for biological monitoring activities at the Sonora River that will be continued until the first semester of 2019 pursuant to such Plan. On January 26, 2017, PROFEPA issued its final resolution under which it declared all mitigation actions completed and its investigation closed. In light of the above, the Company has obtained all necessary formal rulings from SEMARNAT and PROFEPA. On February 7, 2017, the Company closed the trust. In addition, as a result of this process, $10.2 million of excess provision was reversed in the first quarter of 2017. The total expense recorded for this accident in 2014 and 2015 was $136.4 million. Therefore, this matter is closed.

Through the first half of 2015, six collective action lawsuits were filed in federal courts in Mexico City and Sonora against two subsidiaries of the Company seeking economic compensation, clean up and remedial activities in order to restore the environment to its pre-existing conditions. ~~Two~~Three of the collective action lawsuits have been dismissed by the court. ~~The plaintiffs in the four remaining~~As of September 30, 2022, three lawsuits ~~are:~~are still pending: two were filed by Acciones Colectivas de Sinaloa, A.C. ~~which established two collective actions~~;and one by Defensa Colectiva, A.C.; ~~and Ana Luisa Salazar Medina et al. which has been granted a collective action certification. The remaining plaintiffs have requested cautionary~~, requesting precautionary measures onin the construction of facilities ~~for the~~to monitoring of public health services and ~~the prohibition of~~prohibiting the closure of the ~~Río~~Rio Sonora Trust. ~~As of September 30, 2017, these cases remain pending resolution.~~

Similarly, during 2015, eight civil action lawsuits were filed against BVC in the state courts of Sonora seeking damages for alleged injuries and for moral damages as a consequence of the spill. The plaintiffs in the state court lawsuits are: Jose Vicente Arriola Nunez et al; Santana Ruiz Molina et al; Andres Nogales Romero et al; Teodoro Javier Robles et al; Gildardo Vasquez Carvajal et al; Rafael Noriega Souffle et al; Grupo Banamichi Unido de Sonora El Dorado, S.C. de R.L. de C.V; and Marcelino Mercado Cruz. In 2016, three additional civil action lawsuits, claiming similar damages,

Table of Contents

were filed by Juan Melquicedec Lebaron; Blanca Lidia Valenzuela Rivera et al and Ramona Franco Quijada et al. In 2017, BVC was served with ~~thirty-two~~thirty-three additional civil action lawsuits, claiming similar damages. The lawsuits were filed by Francisco Javier Molina Peralta et al; Anacleto Cohen Machini et al; Francisco Rafael Alvarez Ruiz et al; Jose Alberto Martinez Bracamonte et al; Gloria del Carmen Ramirez Duarte et al; Flor Margarita Sabori et al; Blanca Esthela Ruiz Toledo et al; Julio Alfonso Corral ~~Domínguez~~Dominguez et al; Maria Eduwiges Bracamonte Villa et al; Francisca Marquez Dominguez et al; Jose Juan Romo Bravo et al; Jose Alfredo Garcia Leyva et al; Gloria Irma Dominguez Perez et al; Maria del Refugio Romero et al; Miguel Rivas Medina et al; Yolanda Valenzuela Garrobo et al; Maria Elena Garcia Leyva et al; Manuel Alfonso Ortiz Valenzuela et al; Francisco Alberto Arvayo Romero et al; Maria del Carmen Villanueva Lopez et al; Manuel Martin Garcia Salazar; Miguel Garcia Arguelles et al; Dora Elena Rodriguez Ochoa et al; Honora Eduwiges Ortiz Rodriguez et al; Francisco Jose Martinez Lopez et al; Maria Eduwiges Lopez Bustamante; Rodolfo Barron Villa et al, Jose Carlos Martinez Fernandez et al, Maria de los Angeles Fabela et al; Rafaela Edith Haro et al; Luz Mercedes Cruz et al; ~~and~~ Juan Pedro Montaño et al; and Juana Irma Alday Villa. In the first quarter of 2018, BVC was served with another civil action lawsuit, claiming similar damages. The lawsuit was filed by Alma Angelina Del Cid Rivera et al. In the last quarter of 2018, BVC was served with other three civil action lawsuits, claiming similar damages. These lawsuits were filed by Los Corrales de la Estancia, S.C. de R.L.; Jose Antonio Navarro; Jesus Maria Peña Molina, et al; these actions were dismissed by the court, because they have expired. As of September 30, ~~2017, these~~2022, forty-five cases remain pending resolution.

~~During~~In 2015, four constitutional lawsuits (juicios de amparo) were filed before Federal Courts against various authorities and against a subsidiary of the Company, arguing; (i) the alleged lack of a waste management program approved by SEMARNAT; (ii) the alleged lack of a remediation plan approved by SEMARNAT with regard to the August 2014 spill; (iii) the alleged lack

of community approval regarding the environmental impact authorizations granted by SEMARNAT to one subsidiary of the Company; and (iv) the alleged inactivity of the authorities with regard ofto the spill in August 2014. The plaintiffs ofin these lawsuits are: Francisca Garcia Enriquez, et al ~~which established~~filed two lawsuits, Francisco Ramon Miranda, et al and Jesus David Lopez Peralta et al. ~~During~~In the third quarter of 2016, four additional constitutional lawsuits, claiming similar damages were filed by Mario Alberto Salcido et al; Maria Elena Heredia Bustamante et al; Martin Eligio Ortiz Gamez et al; and Maria de los Angeles Enriquez Bacame et al. ~~During~~In the third quarter of 2017, BVC was served with another constitutional lawsuit filed by Francisca García Enriquez et al. In 2018, BVC was served with two additional constitutional lawsuits that were filed against SEMARNAT by Norberto Bustamante et al. With regard to the constitutional lawsuit filed by Maria Elena Heredia Bustamante et al; in which it was claimed the lack of community approval regarding the authorization granted by SEMARNAT to build the new BVC tailings dam, on September 5, 2018, the Supreme Court of Justice issued a resolution establishing that such authorization was granted to BVC in compliance with the applicable legislation. However, SEMARNAT must carry out a public meeting to inform the community of the technical aspects required to build the dam, potential impacts and prevention measures. This public meeting will have no material effects to BVC’s operations. SEMARNAT has carried out the consultation ordered by the Supreme Court. As a result, it has informed the corresponding Judge its compliance with the resolution, in which BVC was required to implement additional measures of environmental impact prevention, such as: (i) the building of at least three monitoring wells downstream from the curtain of the contingency dam in a period of six months; (ii) monitoring of the groundwater level and water quality every six months; (iii) carrying out rain collection work in order to restore water to the Sonora River basin, with six months granted to present the execution program; (iv) determine the location of wildlife conservation and protection areas and define the need to establish biological corridors; (v) obtain photographic or videographic evidence every six months; (vi) submitting to SEMARNAT two years before the closure and abandonment of the site, or earlier if necessary, the closure program that includes the cleaning and restoration of the soil including Mexican regulation NOM-141; (vii) include the measures in the Environmental Monitoring Program according to the environmental components impacted; and (viii) hiring an external environmental consultant to validate compliance with the current and new conditions imposed. The foregoing does not impact BVC’s operations. Additionally, the lawsuits filed by Maria de los Angeles Enriquez Bacame and Norberto Bustamante have been dismissed and closed without prejudice to the Company. As of September 30, ~~2017, these~~2022, the remaining cases ~~remain~~were still pending resolution.

It is currently not ~~currently~~ possible to determine the extent of the damages sought in these state and federal lawsuits but the Company ~~considers~~believes that these lawsuits are without merit. Accordingly, the Company is vigorously defending against them. Nevertheless, the Company ~~considers~~believes that none of the legal proceedings resulting from the spill, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

Table of Contents

Corporate operations:

~~The Company believes that all of its facilities in Peru and Mexico are in material compliance with applicable environmental, mining and other laws and regulations.~~

The Company also believes that continued compliance with environmental laws of Mexico and Peru will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, properties, result of operations, financial condition or prospects and will not result in material capital investments.

~~Litigation matters~~:

~~The “Virgen Maria” Mining Concessions of the Tia Maria Mining Project~~

The Tia Maria project includes various mining concessions, totaling 32,989.64 hectares. One of the concessions is the “Virgen Maria” mining concession totaling 943.72 hectares or 2.9% of the total mining concessions.

Related to the “Virgen Maria” mining concessions, in August 2009, a lawsuit was filed against SCC’s Branch by the former stockholders of Exploraciones de Concesiones Metalicas S.A.C. (“Excomet”). The plaintiffs allege that the acquisition of Excomet’s shares by the Branch is null and void because the $2 million purchase price paid by the Branch for the shares of Excomet was not fairly negotiated by the plaintiffs and the Branch. In 2005, the Branch acquired the shares of Excomet after lengthy negotiations with the plaintiffs, and after the plaintiffs, which were all the stockholders of Excomet, approved the transaction in a general stockholders’ meeting. Excomet was at the time owner of the “Virgen Maria” mining concession. In October 2011, the civil court dismissed the case on the grounds that the claim had been barred by the statute of limitations. On appeal by the plaintiffs, the Superior Court reversed the lower court’s decision and remanded it to the lower court for further proceedings. In August 2015, the lower court dismissed the case on the grounds that the plaintiffs had not proven the alleged unfairness of the negotiations. The plaintiffs appealed this resolution before the Superior Court. In September 2016, the Superior Court confirmed the lower court’s resolution and the plaintiffs filed an extraordinary appeal in order to have the case reviewed by the Supreme Court. As of September 30, 2017, the case remains pending resolution without further developments.

~~The Company asserts that this lawsuit is without merit and is vigorously defending against it. Additionally, the amount of this contingency cannot be reasonably estimated by management at this time.~~

~~The Tia Maria Mining Project~~

There are five lawsuits filed against the Peruvian Branch of the Company related to the Tia Maria project. The lawsuits seek (i) to declare null and void the resolution which approved the Environmental Impact Assessment of the project; (ii) the cancellation of the project and the withdrawal of mining activities in the area and (iii) to declare null and void the mining concession application of the Tia Maria project. The lawsuits were filed by Messrs. Jorge Isaac del Carpio Lazo (filed May 22, 2015), Ernesto Mendoza Padilla (filed May 26, 2015), Juan Alberto Guillen Lopez (filed June 18, 2015), Hernan Raul Hatamare Hual (filed August 6, 2015) and Nicolas Belfiore Nicolini (filed November 13, 2015).

The del Carpio Lazio case was rejected by the court of first instance on November 14, 2016. The plaintiff filed an appeal before the Superior Court on January 3, 2017. As of September 30, 2017, the case remains pending resolution without further developments.

The Mendoza Padilla case was rejected by the lower court on July 8, 2015. This ruling was confirmed by the Superior Court on June 14, 2016. On July 12, 2016, the case was appealed before the Constitutional Court. As of September 30, 2017, the case remains pending resolution without further developments.

~~The Guillen Lopez case is currently before the lower court. As of September 30, 2017, the case remains pending resolution without further developments.~~

On October 3, 2016 the lower court ruled that the Hatamare Hual case had expired and declared the case concluded. The plaintiff has not filed an appeal before the Superior Court. On November 16, 2016, the Company´s Peruvian Branch requested for the case to be closed. ~~The case was closed on February 3, 2017.~~

~~In the Belfiore Nicolini case, the court ruled partially in favor of the plaintiff. However, the Company filed an appeal to challenge said decision.~~ ~~As of September 30, 2017, the case remains pending resolution without further developments.~~

~~Special Regional Pasto Grande Project (“Pasto Grande Project”)~~

In 2012, the Pasto Grande Project, an entity of the Regional Government of Moquegua, filed a lawsuit against SCC’s Peruvian Branch alleging property rights over a certain area used by the Peruvian Branch and seeking the demolition of the tailings dam where SCC’s Peruvian Branch has deposited its tailings from the Toquepala and Cuajone operations since 1995. The Peruvian Branch has had title to use the area in question since 1960 and has constructed and operated the tailing dams with proper governmental authorization, since 1995. SCC’s Peruvian Branch asserts that the lawsuit is without merit and is vigorously defending against it. Upon a motion filed by the Peruvian Branch, the lower court has included MINEM as a defendant in this lawsuit. MINEM has answered the complaint and denied the validity of the claim. As of September 30, 2017, the case remains pending resolution without further developments. The amount of this contingency cannot be reasonably estimated by management at this time.

Carla Lacey, ~~and Barbara Siegfried,~~ on behalf of ~~themselves~~herself and all other similarly situated stockholders of Southern Copper Corporation, and derivatively on behalf of Southern Copper Corporation

~~A purported class action~~In April 2019, a derivative lawsuit was filed against the Company, certain current and former Directors, and Grupo Mexico in the Delaware Court of Chancery ~~was served on the Company and its Directors in February 2016~~ relating to certain construction contracts, contracts for the ~~2012 capitalization~~purchase and sale of ~~99.999% of MGE by Controladora de Infraestructura Energetica Mexico, S.A. de C.V., an indirect subsidiary~~minerals, and transportation contracts entered into between the Company’s subsidiaries and subsidiaries of Grupo ~~Mexico (the “CIEM Capitalization”),~~Mexico.

In October 2019, the plaintiff amended the complaint to include claims related to certain administrative services contracts between the Company’s ~~entry into a power purchase agreement with MGE in 2012 (the “MGE Power Purchase Agreement”),~~subsidiaries and the 2012 restructuring of a loan from the Company’s Mexican Operations to MGE for the construction of two power plants to supply power to the Company’s Mexican operations (the “MGE Loan Restructuring”).Grupo Mexico. The ~~action purports to be brought on behalf of the Company and its common stockholders. The~~amended complaint alleges, among other things, that the ~~CIEM Capitalization, the MGE Power Purchase Agreement~~construction, mineral, transportation, and ~~the MGE Loan Restructuring~~administrative services contracts were ~~the~~unfair as a result of breaches of fiduciary duties and the Company’s charter. The amended complaint also added Americas Mining Corporation (“AMC”) as a defendant, alleging that AMC breached its fiduciary duties as a controlling stockholder of the Company. The amended complaint seeks, among other things, unspecified monetary damages. In January 2020, the Company, ~~has~~the current and former Directors, and Grupo Mexico responded to the complaint by filing motions to dismiss. The Plaintiff filed a brief in response ~~denying these allegations~~to the motions on March 13, 2020. On July 16, 2020, the Court denied the motions to dismiss the breach of fiduciary duty claims against the Directors. On October 6, 2020, the Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claims against Grupo Mexico for lack of personal jurisdiction. On February 11, 2021, the Court granted the Directors’ motion to dismiss plaintiff’s breach of contract claim. The Court also granted AMC’s motion to dismiss all claims against AMC other than those related to the mineral contracts.

On July 12, 2021, the parties reached an agreement-in-principle to settle the lawsuit, subject to Court approval. On September 29, 2021, the parties filed a Stipulation and Agreement of Compromise, Settlement and Release with the Court. On February 1, 2022, the Judge approved the settlement and awarded certain fees to the plaintiff’s attorneys. The Judge’s order for this decision was registered on February 2, 2022. Under applicable law, there was a 30-day period for parties to appeal the Judge's order. This period expired on March 4, 2022, and therefore the Judge's order is ~~currently in the discovery process.~~considered final.

Labor matters:

Peruvian operations: ~~70%~~ 71.7% of the ~~Company’s 4,585~~Company's 4,544 Peruvian employees were unionized at September 30, ~~2017.~~2022. Currently, there are ~~five~~six separate unions, ~~one large union~~none of which represents the majority of workers, as defined by current Peruvian labor legislation.

During 2021, the Company hold talks with the six unions to sign collective agreements prior to their effective dates. As a result, between June and ~~four smaller unions. In the first quarter of 2016,~~December 2021, the Company signed ~~three-year~~collective agreements with ~~all five unions. These agreements include, among other things,~~the six unions with durations between three to six years. All of them granted annual salary increases of 5% ~~for~~. Additionally, each agreement granted, among other things, a signing bonus of between S/45,000 (approximately $11,749) and S/90,000 (approximately $23,499), depending on the duration of the ~~three years.~~agreement. A long-term agreement bonus of S/10,000 (approximately $2,611) was granted to the union that signed a six-year extension of the collective bargaining agreement. All these concepts were recorded as labor expense. In 2022, these collective agreements have been executed. The Company does not have any collective agreement pending to be negotiated with the unions. As of September 30, 2022, it is only pending a signing bonus and a salary increase for one union in compliance with an 20218-2019 Arbitration Award.

In ~~April 2017,~~ the ~~unified labor union~~first half of ~~SPCC~~2022, the six unions came together to defend their rights to work in the Cuajone unit. This action was in response to the cut off of water supply and the obstruction of a railroad section carried out by a small group of residents from the community of Tumilaca, Pocata, Coscore and Tala, Moquegua, which directly affected the health and safety of workers and ~~one of Toquepala’s unions began a strike, demanding a review of certain health~~their families and ~~profit sharing benefits. The strike ended after 12 days. The Company estimates a loss of approximately 1,400 tons of copper production. In July 2017,~~ the ~~same unions began an illegal strike that ended after five days.~~production process.

Mexican ~~operations~~:operations: In recent years, the Mexican operations have experienced a positive improvement ofin their labor environment, as ~~its~~ workers opted to change their affiliation from the Sindicato Nacional de Trabajadores Mineros, Metalurgicos y Similares de la Republica Mexicana (the “National Mining Union”) to other less politicized unions.

~~However, the~~Table of Contents

The workers of the San Martin ~~and Taxco mines, are still under the National Mining Union and have been~~mine were on strike since July 2007. On ~~December 10, 2009, a federal court confirmed~~February 28, 2018, the ~~legality~~striking workers of the San ~~Martin strike. In order~~Martín mine of IMMSA held an election to ~~recover~~vote on the ~~control~~union that would hold the collective bargaining agreement at the San Martín mine. The Federacion Nacional de Sindicatos Independientes (the National Federation of Independent Unions) won the vote by a majority. Nevertheless, the vote was challenged by the National Mining Union. On June 26, 2018, the Federal Mediation and Arbitration Board issued a ruling recognizing the election results. Due to the agreement between workers and the Company to end the protracted strike, on August 22, 2018, the Federal Mediation and Arbitration Board authorized the restart of operations of the San Martin mine and resume operations, the Company filed a court petition on January 27, 2011 requesting that the court, among other things, define the termination payment for each unionized worker. The court denied the petition alleging that, according to federal labor law, the unionMartín mine. Such authorization was ~~the only legitimate party to file such petition. On appeal~~challenged by ~~the Company, on May 13, 2011, the Mexican federal tribunal accepted the petition. In July 2011,~~ the National Mining ~~Union appealed~~Union. On April 4, 2019, the

~~favorable court decision~~ Federal Mediation and Arbitration Board recognized, once again, the election results from February 28, 2018, by which the National Federation of Independent Unions won by a majority. In the last quarter of 2019, a Federal Court issued a resolution that established that the Labor Court should analyze the list of workers with the right to vote in the union election. The Company and the National Federation of Independent Unions challenged such determination before the Supreme ~~Court. On November 7, 2012,~~Court of Justice. Such challenges were dismissed by the Supreme ~~Court affirmed~~Court. As a consequence, on September 6, 2021, the ~~decision~~Federal Mediation and Arbitration Board issued a new resolution determining that, based on the documents submitted by the National Federation of Independent Unions and given the status of the ~~federal tribunal.~~strike until 2018, it was not possible to create a registry of workers holding a right to vote. Therefore, in case of a strike, any economic collective proceedings shall remain suspended. The Federal Mediation and Arbitration Board shall decide on the request of the majority of workers to end the strike, despite the opposition of the National Mining Union. The Company ~~filed a new proceeding before~~expects that the conflict will be solved in accordance with the legal framework set by labor ~~court on~~authorities and that any actions taken will respect the basis of the Supreme Court decision, which recognized the right of the labor court to define responsibility for the strike and the termination payment for each unionized worker. A favorable decision of the labor court in this new proceeding would have the effect of terminating the protracted strike at San Martin. As of September 30, 2017, the case remains pending resolution without further developments.workers’ will.

In the case of the Taxco mine, ~~following the~~its workers refusal to allow exploration of new reserves, the Company commenced litigation seeking to terminate the labor relationship with workers at the mine (including termination of the related collective bargaining agreement). On September 1, 2010, the federal labor court issued a ruling approving the termination of the collective bargaining agreement and all the individual labor contracts of the workers affiliated with the Mexican mining union at the Taxco mine. The mining union appealed the labor court ruling before a federal court. In September 2011, the federal court accepted the union’s appeal and remanded the case to the federal labor court for reconsideration.have been on strike since July 2007. After several legal proceedings on January 25, 2013, the Company filed a new proceeding before the labor court. On June 16, 2014, the labor court denied the petition of the Company. The resolution issued by the labor court was challenged by the Company before a federal court. Inprocedures, in August 2015, the Supreme Court decided to assert jurisdiction over the case and to rule on it directly. As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2022, the case ~~remains~~was pending resolution without further developments.

It is expected that operations at ~~these mines~~the Taxco mine will remain suspended until ~~these~~the labor issues are resolved. In view of ~~these~~the lengthy ~~strikes,~~strike, the Company has reviewed the carrying value of the ~~San Martin and~~ Taxco ~~mines~~mine to ascertain whether impairment exists. The Company concluded that there is a non-material impairment of the assets located at ~~these mines.~~this mine.

Other legal matters:

The Company is involved in various other legal proceedings incidental to its operations, but the Company does not believe that decisions adverse to it in any such proceedings, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

Other ~~commitments~~commitments::

Peruvian ~~Operations~~Operations:

Tia ~~Maria:~~Maria

On August 1, 2014, the Company received ~~the~~ final approval offor Tia Maria´s Environmental Impact Assessment (“EIA”). ~~However,~~On July 8, 2019, the ~~issuance of the project´s construction permit has been delayed due to pressures from anti-mining groups. The~~ Company ~~continues working with community groups in order to resolve open issues concerning the project. The Company is also working jointly with the Peruvian Government to obtain~~received the construction ~~license~~permit for this 120,000 ~~tons of~~tonnes annual SX-EW copper ~~per year~~ greenfield project with a total capital budget of $1,400 million. This permit was obtained after completing an exhaustive review process, complying with all established regulatory requirements and addressing all observations raised. The challenges surrounding the construction permit were overcome when on October 30, 2019, the Mining Council of the Peruvian Ministry of Energy and Mines ratified the construction permit for the Tia Maria project.

The Company ~~expects~~has been working to promote the ~~license~~welfare of the Islay province population. As part of these efforts, the Company has implemented social programs in education, healthcare and productive development to ~~be issued~~improve the quality-of-life in the ~~first quarter 2018.~~region. The Company has also promoted agricultural and livestock activities in the Tambo Valley and supported growth in manufacturing, fishing and tourism in Islay. In 2021, the Peruvian Branch fortified its relation with the regional government and overcame its opposition to project initiation. This new consensus was reflected in an agreement for Social Investment for Taxes for projects relative to health facilities and roads. The Company´s efforts to

Table of Contents

ensure the current and long-term welfare of the population in the area of influence of the Tia Maria project were recognized by several local associations, which sent letters to the National Government to request project initiation.

During the construction and operation phase, the Company will make it a priority to hire local labor to fill the 9,000 jobs that the Company expects to generate during Tia Maria’s construction phase. Additionally, from day one of its operations, the Company will generate significant contributions to revenues in the Arequipa region.

Tia Maria´s project budget is approximately $1.4 billion, of which ~~$350.3~~$333.7 million ~~has~~had been invested ~~through~~as of September 30, ~~2017. When completed, it is expected to produce 120,000 tons of copper cathodes per year.~~2022. This project will use state-of-the-art SX-EW technology with the highest international environmental standards. SX-EW facilities are the most environmentally friendly in the industry as they do not require a smelting process and ~~consequently, no~~therefore, do not release any emissions ~~are released~~ into the atmosphere. ~~The~~

Michiquillay

In June 2018, the Company signed a contract for the acquisition of the Michiquillay copper project ~~will only use seawater, transporting this~~in Cajamarca, Peru, at a purchase price of $400 million. Michiquillay is a world-class mining project with estimated inferred mineral resources of 2,288 million tonnes with an estimated copper grade of 0.43%. It is expected to produce 225,000 tonnes of copper per year (along with by-products of molybdenum, gold and silver) for an initial mine life of more than 25 ~~kilometers to 1,000 meters above sea level,~~years.

As per the purchase agreement, the Company paid $12.5 million at the signing of the contract and ~~includes a desalinization plant which~~$12.5 million in June 2021. The remaining balance of $375.0 million will be ~~constructed at~~paid if the Company decides to develop the project. Therefore, it is not a ~~cost~~present obligation. In June 2022, the Company notified the Peruvian authorities the end of ~~$95 million. Consequently,~~ the ~~Tambo river water resources~~suspension period and the ~~water resources from~~start of the ~~wells~~pre-operational period that lasts 12 years and it can be extended for three more years. The start of the pre-operational period does not imply a payment obligation. The Company must support an investment of $20 million in the ~~area~~next five years which includes exploration activities as well as the development of social programs.

In 2021, the Company signed social agreements with the Michiquillay and La Encañada communities. In addition, in October 2021, the Peruvian Ministry of Energy and Mines approved the semi-detailed environmental impact study for the project. Currently, the Company has all the required permits for exploration activities. These events will ~~be used solely~~allow Southern Copper to initiate an in-depth exploration program in November of 2022.

Social agreements with the Michiquillay and La Encañada communities represent an opportunity to improve quality of life of their residents through the Company´s strong social programs and backed by a solid framework for ~~farming and human consumption.~~

~~The Company expects~~technical work at the project ~~to generate 3,500 jobs during~~level. The main commitments signed by the construction phase. When in operation, Tia Maria will directly employ 600 workers and indirectly provide jobs to another 2,000. Through its expected twenty-year life, the project related services will create significant business opportunitiesCompany in the ~~Arequipa region.~~social agreements are related to providing support for agricultural and livestock activities, financial support for local initiatives, and social programs in favor of education, water management, waste disposal, and healthcare for vulnerable groups.

In view of the delay in this project, the Company continues to review the carrying value of this asset to ascertain whether impairment exists. Should the Tia Maria project not move forward, the Company is confident that most of the project equipment will continue to be used productively, through reassignment to other mine locations operated by the Company. The Company believes that an impairment loss, if any, will not be material.

~~Toquepala Concentrator Expansion:~~

In April 2015, the construction permit for the Toquepala expansion project was approved by the MINEM. The project budget is $1.2 billion, of which $743.5 million has been expended through September 30, 2017. When completed, this expansion project is expected to increase annual production capacity by 100,000 tons of copper and 3,100 tons of molybdenum. The project has reached 80% progress and is expected to be completed by the second quarter 2018.

Corporate Social ~~Responsibility:~~Responsibility

The Company has a corporate social responsibility policy to maintain and promote the continuity of its mining operations ~~and obtain~~while obtaining the best results. The main objective of this policy is to integrate ~~its~~the Company´s operations with ~~the~~ local communities in the areas of influence of its operations by creating a permanent positive ~~relationship with them, in order~~relationships to develop ~~the~~ optimum social conditions and to promote sustainable development in the area. Accordingly, the Company has made the following commitments:

Tacna Region: In connection with the Toquepala concentrator expansion, the Company has committed to ~~fund~~funding various social and infrastructure improvement projects in Toquepala’s neighboring communities. The total amount committed for these purposes is S/445.0 million (approximately ~~$132~~$111.7 million). In relation to this commitment, the Company has completed the construction of a school with an investment of S/18.8 million (approximately $4.7 million), has co-financed the construction of the Cularjahuira dam for S/15.6 million (approximately $3.9 million) and is preparing engineering study for the Callazas dam for S/2.6 million (approximately $0.7 million).

Table of Contents

As the Toquepala expansion project has been completed, the Company considers that these commitments constitute present obligations of the Company and consequently has recorded a liability of $30.8 million in its condensed consolidated financial statements as of September 30, 2022.

In addition, the Company has committed S/97.7 million (approximately $24.5 million) for the construction of a high-achievement school in the Tacna region under the “Social Investment for Taxes” (obras por impuestos) program, which allows the Company to use these amounts as an advance payment of taxes.

Moquegua Region: In the Moquegua region, the Company ~~is part of~~participates in a “development roundtable” ~~in which the~~with local municipal authorities ~~the~~and community representatives ~~and the Company~~to discuss ~~the~~ social needs and to determine the ~~way~~ways that the Company ~~could~~can contribute to sustainable development in the region. ~~As part of this,~~Although the development roundtable is not currently meeting, it was previously discussing the creation of a Moquegua Region Development Fund, for which the Company has offered a contribution of S/ ~~700~~1,000 million (approximately ~~$209~~$251.0 million). While final funding is not yet settled, the Company has committed to contribute S/ ~~108.5~~108.4 million (approximately ~~$32~~$27.2 million) inas an advance, which ~~is being~~was utilized into fund an educational ~~project and S/ 48.4 million (approximately $14 million) for~~project. In addition, there is a commitment to finance the construction of a residual water treatment plant in Ilo for S/105.5 million (approximately $24.5 million). There was also a ~~sea-wall embankment~~commitment to build three schools in Moquegua for S/18.2 million (approximately $4.6 million) and ~~a fresh water facility at El Algarrobal.~~to build tracks and sidewalks in Pacocha for S/6.4 million (approximately $1.6 million), which have been completed.

In addition, the Company has committed S/ ~~143.0~~141.4 million (approximately ~~$43~~$35.5 million) ~~for the construction of five~~to build three infrastructure projects in the Moquegua region under the “social investment for taxes” (obras por impuestos) program, which allows the Company to use these amounts as an advance payment of taxes.

These commitments are subject to the continuity of the respective mine operations and, as such, are not considered to be present obligations of the Company. Therefore, the Company has not recorded a liability in its condensed consolidated financial statements.

~~Peruvian operations~~

Power purchase ~~agreements:~~agreements

●	Electroperu S.A.: In June 2014, the Company entered into a power purchase agreement for 120 megawatts (“MW”) with the state power company Electroperu S.A., under which Electroperu S.A. began supplying energy for the Peruvian operations for twenty years starting on April 17, 2017.

●

Kallpa Generacion S.A. (“Kallpa”): In July 2014, the Company entered into a power purchase agreement for 120MW with Kallpa, an independent Israeli owned power company, under which Kallpa will supply energy for the Peruvian operations for ten years starting on April 17, 2017 and ending on April 30, 2027. In May 2016, the Company signed an additional power purchase agreement for a maximum of 80MW with Kallpa, under which Kallpa began supplying energy for the Peruvian operations related to the Toquepala Expansion and other minor projects starting on May 1, 2017 and ending on October 31, 2029.

·~~Electroperu S.A.:~~ In June 2014, the Company signed a power purchase agreement for 120 megawatt (“MW”) with the state power company Electroperu S.A., under which Electroperu S.A. will supply energy for the Peruvian operations for twenty years starting on April 17, 2017 and ending on April 30, 2037.

Mexican operations:

·~~Kallpa Generacion S.A. (“Kallpa”):~~ In July 2014, the Company signed a power purchase agreement for 120MW with Kallpa, an independent Israeli owned power company, under which Kallpa will supply energy for the Peruvian operations for ten years starting on April 17, 2017 and ending on April 30, 2027. In May 2016, the Company signed an additional power purchase agreement for a maximum of 80MW with Kallpa, under which Kallpa will supply energy for the Peruvian operations related to the Toquepala Expansion and other minor projects for ten years starting on May 1, 2017 and ending after ten years of commercial operation of the Toquepala Expansion or on April 30, 2029; whichever happens first. On August 16, 2017, Kallpa merged with Cerro del Aguila S.A. (another power generating company owned by the same economic group); the name of the merged entity is still Kallpa Generacion S.A. and both power purchase agreements signed with Kallpa have not been affected by the noted merger.

~~Mexican operations~~

Power purchase ~~agreements:~~agreements

●	MGE: In 2012, the Company signed a power purchase agreement with MGE, an indirect subsidiary of Grupo Mexico, to supply power to some of the Company’s Mexican operations through 2032. For further information, please see Note 5 “Related party transactions”.

●

Eolica el Retiro, S.A.P.I. de C.V.: In 2013, the Company signed a power purchase agreement with Eolica el Retiro, S.A.P.I. de C.V. a windfarm energy producer that is an indirect subsidiary of Grupo Mexico, to supply power to some of the Company´s Mexican operations. For further information, please see Note 5 “Related party transactions”.

●

Parque Eolico de Fenicias, S. de R.L. de C.V.: On February 20, 2020, the Company signed a power purchase agreement with Parque Eolico de Fenicias, S. de R.L. de C.V., an indirect subsidiary of Grupo Mexico, to supply 611,400 MWh of power per year to some of the Company´s Mexican operations for 20 years. The agreement is expected to become effective in the first semester of 2023.

Table of Contents

·~~MGE:~~ In 2012, the Company signed a power purchase agreement with MGE, an indirect subsidiary of Grupo Mexico, to supply power to some of the Company’s Mexican operations through 2032. For further information, please see Note 7 “Related party transactions”.Corporate operations:

· Eolica el Retiro S.A.P.I. de C.V.: In 2013, the Company signed a power purchase agreement with Eolica el Retiro, S.A.P.I de C.V. a windfarm energy producer that is an indirect subsidiary of Grupo Mexico, to supply power to some of the Company´s Mexican operations. For further information, please see Note 7 “Related party transactions”.

~~Corporate operations~~

Commitment for ~~Capital projects:~~capital projects

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2022, the Company ~~has~~had committed approximately ~~$775.8~~$434.8 million ~~for~~to the development of its capital investment projects at its operations.

Tax contingency matters:

Tax contingencies are provided for under ASC 740-10-50-15 Uncertain tax position (see Note 4 “Income taxes”).

~~NOTE 10 — SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION:~~

Company management views Southern Copper as having three reportable segments and manages it on the basis of these segments. The reportable segments identified by the Company are: the Peruvian operations, the Mexican open-pit operations and the Mexican underground mining operations segment identified as the IMMSA unit.

The three reportable segments identified are groups of mines, each of which constitute an operating segment, with similar economic characteristics, type of products, processes and support facilities, similar regulatory environments, similar employee bargaining contracts and similar currency risks. In addition, each mine within the individual group earns revenues from similar type of customers for their products and services and each group incurs expenses independently, including commercial transactions between groups.

Financial information is regularly prepared for each of the three segments and the results of the Company’s operations are regularly reported to Senior Management on the segment basis. Senior Management of the Company focus on operating income and on total assets as measures of performance to evaluate different segments and to make decisions to allocate resources to the reported segments. These are common measures in the mining industry.

~~Financial information relating to Southern Copper’s segments is as follows:~~

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

(in millions)

Mexican
Open-Pit

Mexican
IMMSA Unit

Peruvian
Operations

Corporate, other
and eliminations

Consolidated

Net sales outside of segments

$
1,023.3

$
87.5

$
565.7

—

$
1,676.5

Intersegment sales

16.0

$
(16.0
)
—

Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)

373.6

73.8

350.6

(16.5
)
781.5

Selling, general and administrative

15.3

1.5

8.9

(0.7
)
25.0

Depreciation, amortization and depletion

97.1

13.1

55.1

4.0

169.3

Exploration

0.7

1.9

4.9

0.6

8.1

Operating income

$
536.6

$
13.2

$
146.2

$
(3.4
)
692.6

Less:

Interest, net

(69.8
)
Other income (expense)

(6.2
)
Income taxes

(220.1
)
Equity earnings of affiliate

6.3

Non-controlling interest

(1.0
)
Net income attributable to SCC

$
401.8

Capital investment

$
71.6

$
12.8

$
127.2

$
1.1

$
212.7

Property and mine development, net

$
5,109.2

$
374.1

$
3,198.7

$
246.3

$
8,928.3

Total assets

$
8,466.8

$
887.2

$
4,613.5

$
14.9

$
13,982.4

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

(in millions)

Mexican
Open-pit

Mexican
IMMSA Unit

Peruvian
Operations

Corporate, other
and eliminations

Consolidated

Net sales outside of segments

$
865.0

$
94.9

$
440.8

—

$
1,400.7

Intersegment sales

19.0

$
(19.0
)
—

Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)

462.6

73.8

341.8

(46.8
)
831.4

Selling, general and administrative

11.3

2.1

9.0

0.3

22.7

Depreciation, amortization and depletion

94.5

15.8

54.0

10.2

174.5

Exploration

2.5

1.7

2.1

3.4

9.7

Operating income

$
294.1

$
20.5

$
33.9

$
13.9

362.4

Less:

Interest, net

(71.3
)
Other income (expense)

9.6

Income taxes

(111.2
)
Equity earnings of affiliate

8.7

Non-controlling interest

(0.6
)
Net income attributable to SCC

$
197.6

Capital investment

$
112.8

$
8.7

$
151.8

$
2.3

$
275.6

Property and mine development, net

$
5,094.2

$
448.6

$
2,796.6

$
242.0

$
8,581.4

Total assets

$
8,052.2

$
800.3

$
4,262.4

$
(51.9
)
$
13,063.0

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

(in millions)

Mexican
Open-Pit

Mexican
IMMSA Unit

Peruvian
Operations

Corporate, other
and eliminations

Consolidated

Net sales outside of segments

$
2,875.3

$
305.0

$
1,609.9

—

$
4,790.2

Intersegment sales

54.1

$
(54.1
)
—

Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)

1,230.0

248.2

1,009.8

(57.8
)
2,430.2

Selling, general and administrative

36.4

5.7

26.4

0.1

68.6

Depreciation, amortization and depletion

295.7

39.0

147.5

11.6

493.8

Exploration

1.9

3.5

9.2

4.3

18.9

Environmental remediation

(10.2
)
—

—

—

(10.2
)
Operating income

$
1,321.5

$
62.7

$
417.0

$
(12.3
)
1,788.9

Less:

Interest, net

(231.4
)
Other income (expense)

1.6

Income taxes

(556.6
)
Equity earnings of affiliate

16.1

Non-controlling interest

(2.6
)
Net income attributable to SCC

$
1,016.0

Capital investment

$
217.7

$
25.8

$
464.0

$
2.9

$
710.4

Property and mine development, net

$
5,109.2

$
374.1

$
3,198.7

$
246.3

$
8,928.3

Total assets

$
8,466.8

$
887.2

$
4,613.5

$
14.9

$
13,982.4

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

(in millions)

Mexican
Open-pit

Mexican
IMMSA Unit

Peruvian
Operations

Corporate, other
and eliminations

Consolidated

Net sales outside of segments

$
2,422.5

$
247.5

$
1,310.8

—

$
3,980.8

Intersegment sales

53.5

$
(53.5
)
—

Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)

1,288.8

215.8

958.0

(152.7
)
2,309.9

Selling, general and administrative

37.5

5.4

28.6

1.0

72.5

Depreciation, amortization and depletion

267.0

39.6

162.3

5.4

474.3

Exploration

5.5

4.7

9.7

10.5

30.4

Operating income

$
823.7

$
35.5

$
152.2

$
82.3

1,093.7

Less:

Interest, net

(214.1
)
Other income (expense)

14.9

Income taxes

(305.4
)
Equity earnings of affiliate

17.4

Non-controlling interest

(1.9
)
Net income attributable to SCC

$
604.6

Capital investment

$
379.7

$
26.2

$
432.2

$
2.4

$
840.5

Property and mine development, net

$
5,094.2

$
448.6

$
2,796.6

$
242.0

$
8,581.4

Total assets

$
8,052.2

$
800.3

$
4,262.4

$
(51.9
)
$
13,063.0

NOTE 11 — STOCKHOLDERS’EQUITY:

Treasury Stock:

Activity in treasury stock in the nine-month period ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021 is as follows (in millions):

	2017			2016

							2022		2021
Southern Copper common shares
Balance as of January 1,	$	2,769.0		$	2,697.6		$	2,767.2	$	2,767.5
Purchase of shares	—			71.7
Used for corporate purposes	(0.3		)	(0.3		)		(0.2)		(0.1)
Balance as of September 30,	2,768.7			2,769.0				2,767.0		2,767.4


Parent Company (Grupo Mexico) common shares
Balance as of January 1,	218.6			211.3				306.8		296.0
Other activity, including dividend, interest and foreign currency transaction effect	9.4			6.7				22.5		17.4
Balance as of September 30,	228.0			218.0				329.3		313.4

Treasury stock balance as of September 30,	$	2,996.7		$	2,987.0		$	3,096.3	$	3,080.8

~~The following table summarizes share distributions in the nine months of 2017 and 2016:~~

2017

2016

Southern Copper common shares

Directors’ Stock Award Plan

12,000

12,000

Parent Company (Grupo Mexico) common shares

Employee stock purchase plan (shares in millions)

0.3

0.9

Common Stock:

In September 2022, Grupo Mexico, through its wholly owned subsidiary AMC, purchased 350,000 shares of SCC’s Common Stock. With this purchase and the Company’s repurchase of shares of its Common Stock, the indirect ownership of Grupo Mexico increased to 88.92% at September 30, 2022.

Southern Copper Common Shares:

AtOn September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016,~~on December 31, 2021, there were in treasury ~~111,567,617~~111,500,417 and ~~110,579,617~~111,509,217 shares of SCC’s common ~~shares,~~stock, respectively.

SCC share repurchase program:

In 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors (“BOD”) authorized a $500 million share repurchase program that has since been increased by the BOD and is currently authorized to $3 billion. Pursuant to this program, the Company has purchased 119.5 million shares of common stock at a cost of $2.9 billion. These shares are available for general corporate purposes. The

Company may purchase additional shares of its common stock from time to time, based on market conditions and other factors. This repurchase program has no expiration date and may be modified or discontinued at any time.

There has ~~not~~ been no activity in the SCC share repurchase program since the third quarter of 2016. The NYSE closing price offor SCC common shares atas of September 30, ~~2017~~2022 was ~~$39.76~~$44.84 and the maximum number of shares that the Company could purchase at that price ~~is 2.1 million shares.~~was 1.8 million.

Table of Contents

As a result of the repurchase of shares of SCC’s common stock, Grupo Mexico’s direct and indirect ownership was 88.9% as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2022.

Directors’ Stock Award Plan:

The Company established a stock award compensation plan for certain directors who are not compensated as employees of the Company. Under this plan, participants ~~will receive~~received 1,200 shares of common stock upon election and 1,200 additional shares following each annual meeting of stockholders thereafter. 600,000 shares of Southern Copper common stock have been reserved for this plan. ~~The Company’s Board of Directors and~~On April 26, 2018, the Company's stockholders approved a ~~one-year~~five-year extension of the Plan until January 29, ~~2018.~~2023 and an increase of the shares award from 1,200 to 1,600. The fair value of the award is measured each year at the date of the grant. Commencing with the 2021 grant, the 1,600 shares shall be granted quarterly and conditioned upon the attendance of each director to each Board meeting. The award is not subject to vesting requirements.


	2022	2021
Total SCC shares reserved for the plan	600,000	600,000
Total shares granted at January 1,	(405,200)	(391,600)
Granted in the period	(8,800)	(8,000)
Total shares granted at September 30,	(414,000)	(399,600)
Remaining shares reserved	186,000	200,400

~~The activity of the plan in the three-month period ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:~~

2017

2016

Total SCC shares reserved for the plan

600,000

600,000

Total shares granted at January 1,

(334,800
)
(322,800
)
Granted in the period

(12,000
)
(12,000
)
Total shares granted at September 30,

(346,800
)
(334,800
)

Remaining shares reserved

253.200

265,200

Parent Company common shares:

At September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~at December 31, 2021 there were in treasury ~~110,941,769~~75,332,743 and ~~115,781,665~~79,800,655 of Grupo Mexico’s common shares, respectively.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan:

~~2010~~2015 Plan: ~~During 2010,~~In January 2015, the Company offered to eligible employees a new stock purchase plan through a trust that acquires series B shares of Grupo Mexico stock for sale to its employees, and employees of subsidiaries, and certain affiliated companies. The purchase price was established at 26.51 Mexican pesos (approximately $1.28) for the initial subscription. Every two years employees were able to acquire title to 50% of the shares paid in the previous two years. The employees paid for shares purchased through monthly payroll deductions over the eight year period of the plan. At the end of the eight year period, the Company granted the participant a bonus of one share for every ten shares purchased by the employee.

The participants were entitled to receive dividends in cash for dividends paid by Grupo Mexico for all shares that were fully purchased and paid by the employee as of the date that the dividend is paid. If the participant had only partially paid for shares, the entitled dividends were used to reduce the remaining liability owed for purchased shares.

In the case of voluntary or involuntary resignation/termination of the employee, the Company paid to the employee the fair market sales price at the date of resignation/termination of the fully paid shares, net of costs and taxes. When the fair market sales value of the shares was higher than the purchase price, the Company applied a deduction over the amount to be paid to the employee based on a decreasing schedule specified in the plan.

In case of retirement or death of the employee, the Company rendered the buyer or his legal beneficiary, the fair market sales value as of the date of retirement or death of the shares effectively paid, net of costs and taxes.

~~The stock based compensation expense for the nine months 2017 and 2016 and the unrecognized compensation expense under this plan were as follows (in millions):~~

2017

2016

Stock based compensation expense

$
0.4

$
0.4

Unrecognized compensation expense

$
0.4

$
1.2

~~The unrecognized compensation expense under this plan~~ ~~is expected to be recognized over the remaining one year and three month period.~~

~~The following table presents the activity of this plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:~~

Shares

Unit Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value

Outstanding shares at January 1, 2017

1,401,096

$
2.05

Granted

—

—

Exercised

(7,433
)
2.05

Forfeited

—

—

Outstanding shares at September 30, 2017

1,393,663

$
2.05

Outstanding shares at January 1, 2016

2,227,582

$
2.05

Granted

—

—

Exercised

(740,601
)
2.05

Forfeited

—

—

Outstanding shares at September 30, 2016

1,486,981

$
2.05

~~2015 Plan~~: In January 2015, the Company offered to eligible employees a new stock purchase plan (the “New Employee Stock Purchase Plan”) through a trust that acquires series B of shares of Grupo Mexico stock for sale to its employees, and employees of subsidiaries, and certain affiliated companies.

~~The purchase price was established~~set at 38.44 Mexican pesos (approximately ~~$1.86)~~$2.63) for the initial subscription, which expires onin January 2023. Every two years employees will be able to acquire title to 50% of the shares paid in the previous two years. The employees will pay for shares purchased through monthly payroll deductions over the eight year period of the plan. At the end of the eight year period, the Company will grant the participant a bonus of 1 share for every 10 shares purchased by the employee. Any future subscription will be at the average market price at the date of acquisition or the grant date.

If Grupo Mexico pays dividends on shares during the eight year period, the participants will be entitled to receive the dividend in cash for all shares that have been fully purchased and paid as of the date that the dividend is paid. If the participant has only partially paid for shares, the entitled dividends will be used to reduce the remaining liability owed for purchased shares.

In the case of voluntary or involuntary resignation/termination of the employee, the Company will pay to the employee the fair market sales price at the date of resignation of the fully paid shares, net of costs and taxes. When the fair market sales value of the shares is higher than the purchase price, the Company will apply a deduction over the amount to be paid to the employee based on a decreasing schedule specified in the plan.

In case of retirement or death of the employee, the Company will render the buyer or his legal beneficiary, the fair market sales value as of the date of retirement or death of the shares effectively paid, net of costs and taxes.

Table of Contents

The stock based compensation expense for the first nine months of ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021 and the unrecognized compensation expense under this plan were as follows (in millions):


	2022		2021
Stock based compensation expense	$	0.5	$	0.5
Unrecognized compensation expense	$	0.5	$	1.0

2017

2016

Stock based compensation expense

$
0.4

$
0.4

Unrecognized compensation expense

$
3.4

$
4.0

The following table presents the activity of this plan for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016:~~2021:

Shares

Unit Weighted Average
Grant Date Fair Value

Outstanding shares at January 1, 2017

2,540,223

$
2.63

Granted

—

—

Exercised

(248,992
)
2.63

Forfeited

—

—

Outstanding shares at September 30, 2017

2,291,231

$
2.63

Outstanding shares at January 1, 2016

2,656,386

$
2.63

Granted

—

—

Exercised

(103,852
)
2.63

Forfeited

—

—

Outstanding shares at September 30, 2016

2,552,534

$
2.63


		Unit Weighted Average
	Shares	Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding shares at January 1, 2022	867,234	$	2.63
Granted	—		—
Exercised	(21,339)	$	2.63
Forfeited	—		—
Outstanding shares at September 30, 2022	845,895	$	2.63
Outstanding shares at January 1, 2021	1,264,410	$	2.63
Granted	—		—
Exercised	(381,288)	$	2.63
Forfeited	—		—
Outstanding shares at September 30, 2021	883,122	$	2.63

2018 Plan: In November 2018, the Company offered a new stock purchase plan (the “New Employee Stock Purchase Plan”) to eligible employees through a trust that acquires series B shares of Grupo Mexico stock for sale to its employees, and employees of subsidiaries, and certain affiliated companies. The purchase price was established at 37.89 Mexican pesos (approximately $1.86) for the initial subscription, which expires in October 2026. Every two years employees will be able to acquire title to 50% of the shares paid in the previous two years. The employees will pay for shares purchased through monthly payroll deductions over the eight-year period of the plan. At the end of the eight-year period, the Company will grant the participant a bonus of 1 share for every 10 shares purchased by the employee. Any future subscription will be at the average market price at the date of acquisition or the grant date.

If Grupo Mexico pays dividends on shares during the eight-year period, the participants will be entitled to receive the dividend in cash for all shares that have been fully purchased and paid as of the date that the dividend is paid. If the participant has only partially paid for shares, the entitled dividends will be used to reduce the remaining liability owed for purchased shares.

In the case of voluntary or involuntary resignation/termination of the employee, the Company will pay to the employee the fair market sales price on the date of resignation of the fully paid shares, net of costs and taxes. When the fair market sales value of the shares is higher than the purchase price, the Company will apply a deduction over the amount to be paid to the employee based on a decreasing schedule specified in the plan.

The stock based compensation expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 and the unrecognized compensation expense under this plan were as follows (in millions):


	2022		2021
Stock based compensation expense	$	0.5	$	0.5
Unrecognized compensation expense	$	2.6	$	3.3

The following table presents the stock award activity of this plan for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021:

Table of Contents


			Unit Weighted Average
	Shares		Grant Date Fair Value
Outstanding shares at January 1, 2022	3,173,924	$	1.86
Granted	—		—
Exercised	(312,907)	$	1.86
Forfeited	—		—
Outstanding shares at September 30, 2022	2,861,017	$	1.86
Outstanding shares at January 1, 2021	3,918,458	$	1.86
Granted	—		—
Exercised	(716,449)	$	1.86
Forfeited	—		—
Outstanding shares at September 30, 2021	3,202,009	$	1.86

Non-controlling interest:

The following table presents the non-controlling interest activity for the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016:~~2021 (in millions):


	2022		2021
Balance as of January 1,	$	58.6	$	51.2
Net earnings		6.8		10.6
Dividend paid		(4.2)		(4.4)
Balance as of September 30,	$	61.2	$	57.4

2017

2016

Balance as of January 1,

$
38.6

$
36.3

Net earnings

2.6

1.9

Dividend paid

(0.6
)
—

Balance as of September 30,

$
40.6

$
38.2

NOTE 12 — ~~FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS:~~FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT:

Subtopic 820-10 of ASC “Fair value measurement and disclosures — Overall” establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under Subtopic 820-10 are described below:

Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, but do not qualify as Level 1 inputs. (i.e., quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities).

Level 3 - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).

The carrying amounts of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable (other than accounts receivable associated with provisionally priced sales) and accounts payable approximate fair value due to their short maturities. Consequently, such financial instruments are not included in the following table, ~~that~~which provides information about the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of other financial instruments that are not measured at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and December 31, ~~2016~~2021 (in millions):

	At September 30, 2017				At December 31, 2016
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value

									At September 30, 2022				At December 31, 2021
									Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value
Liabilities:
Long-term debt	$	5,956.3	$	6,970.8	$	5,954.2	$	6,212.0

Long-term debt level 1										6,499.1		6,152.7		6,496.4		8,506.0
Long-term debt level 2										51.2		58.7		51.2		67.2
Total long-term debt									$	6,550.3	$	6,211.4	$	6,547.6	$	8,573.2

Table of Contents

Long-term debt is carried at amortized cost and its estimated fair value is based on quoted market prices classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy except for the case of the Yankee bonds, which qualify as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy as they are based on quoted ~~priced~~prices in ~~market~~markets that are not active.

Fair values of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were calculated as follows as of September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and December 31, ~~2016~~2021 (in millions):


	Fair Value at Measurement Date Using:
					Significant
	Fair Value		Quoted prices in		other		Significant
	as of		active markets for		observable		unobservable
	September 30,		identical assets		inputs		inputs
Description	2022		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Short term investment:
—Trading securities	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
—Available-for-sale debt securities:
Asset backed securities		0.1		—		0.1		—
Mortgage backed securities		0.2		—		0.2		—
Accounts receivable:
—Embedded derivatives—Not classified as hedges:
Provisionally priced sales:
Copper		954.4		954.4		—		—
Molybdenum		279.7		279.7		—		—
Total	$	1,234.4	$	1,234.1	$	0.3	$	—

~~Fair Value at Measurement Date Using:~~


									Fair Value at Measurement Date Using:
													Significant
									Fair Value		Quoted prices in		other		Significant
									as of		active markets for		observable		unobservable
									December 31,		identical assets		inputs		inputs
Description	Fair Value as of September 30, 2017		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)		2021		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Assets:
Short term investment:
- Trading securities	$	29.5	$	29.5	$	—	$	—
- Available-for-sale debt securities:
Corporate bonds	0.1		—		0.1		—
—Trading securities									$	486.5	$	486.5	$	—	$	—
—Available-for-sale debt securities:
Asset backed securities	0.5		—		0.5		—			0.2		—		0.2		—
Mortgage backed securities	0.4		—		0.4		—			0.2		—		0.2		—

Accounts receivable:
- Embedded derivatives - Not classified as hedges:
—Embedded derivatives-Not classified as hedges:
Provisionally priced sales:
Copper	154.2		154.2		—		—			876.2		876.2		—		—
Molybdenum	88.1		88.1		—		—			288.3		288.3		—		—
Total	$	272.8	$	271.8	$	1.0	$	—	$	1,651.4	$	1,651.0	$	0.4	$	—

~~Fair Value at Measurement Date Using:~~

Description

Fair Value
as of
December
31, 2016

Quoted prices in
active markets for
identical assets
(Level 1)

Significant other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)

Significant
unobservable
inputs
(Level 3)

Assets:

Short term investment:

- Trading securities

$
49.2

$
49.2

—

$
—

- Available-for-sale debt securities:

Corporate bonds

—

—

—

—

Asset backed securities

—

—

—

—

Mortgage backed securities

2.1

—

$
2.1

—

Accounts receivable:

- Embedded derivatives - Not classified as hedges:

Provisionally priced sales:

Copper

203.8

203.8

—

—

Molybdenum

54.0

54.0

—

—

Total

$
309.1

$
307.0

$
2.1

$
—

The Company’s short-term trading securities investments are classified as Level 1 because they are valued using quoted prices of the same securities as they consist of bonds issued by public companies and are publicly traded. The Company’s short-term available-for-sale investments are classified as Level 2 because they are valued using quoted prices for similar investments.

Table of Contents

The Company’s accounts receivables associated with provisionally priced copper sales are valued using quoted market prices based on the forward price on the LME or on the COMEX. Such value is classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Molybdenum prices are established by reference to the publication ~~Platt’s~~Platts Metals Week and are considered Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.

~~NOTE 13 — SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES:~~

~~PROPOSED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS~~

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09 “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (Topic 606). The objective of the new revenue standard is to provide a single comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability within industries, across industries and across capital markets.

~~The core principle of the standard is that the Company should recognize revenue to represent the transfer of promised goods or services to customers~~addition, in ~~an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services.~~

~~The Company should apply the following five steps to achieve the core principle:~~

~~Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer.~~

~~Step 2: Identify the performance obligations (promises) in the contract.~~

~~Step 3: Determine the transaction price.~~

~~Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.~~

~~Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies a performance obligation.~~

The guidance also specifies the accounting for some costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer. Additionally, the Company should disclose sufficient qualitative and quantitative information to enable users of financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers.

On July 9, 2015, the FASB approved a one year deferral of the effective date of the new revenue standard for all entities. This revenue standard is effective for the first interim period within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of the adoption of this new standard on the consolidated financial information.

~~IMPACT OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS~~

~~During~~ the third quarter of ~~2017,~~2021, the ~~FASB issued~~Company acquired two derivative instruments to protect natural gas costs from estimated price increases in the previous winter season. These derivative instruments occupied November 2021 through March 2022 period. For further information please refer to Note 6 “Derivative instruments.”

NOTE 13 — REVENUE:

The Company’s net sales were $2,156.9 and $7,227.6 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022, respectively, compared to $2,680.9 and $8,110.4 million in the same period of 2021. The geographic breakdown of the Company’s sales is as follows (in millions):


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2022
			Mexican
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		Corporate &
	Open-Pit		Unit		Operations		Elimination		Consolidated
The Americas:
Mexico	$	414.7	$	103.8	$	—	$	(30.9)	$	487.6
United States		333.9		11.4		86.4		—		431.7
Peru		(19.7)		—		126.6		11.4		118.3
Brazil		—		16.1		104.5		—		120.6
Chile		10.4		—		91.2		—		101.6
Other American countries		10.8		1.2		7.7		—		19.7
Europe:
Switzerland		123.9		10.9		161.6		—		296.4
Italy		—		6.2		74.3		—		80.5
Spain		90.2		—		(3.0)		—		87.2
Other European countries		49.0		9.6		42.9		—		101.5
Asia:
China		101.9		—		18.1		—		120.0
Singapore		48.1		(0.1)		14.1		—		62.1
Japan		9.2		—		84.6		—		93.8
Other Asian countries		29.1		0.1		6.7		—		35.9
Total	$	1,201.5	$	159.2	$	815.7	$	(19.5)	$	2,156.9

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
			Mexican
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		Corporate &
	Open-Pit		Unit		Operations		Elimination		Consolidated
The Americas:
Mexico	$	483.1	$	115.7	$	4.5	$	(42.8)	$	560.5
United States		324.9		11.2		71.3		—		407.4
Peru		—		(0.4)		148.3		—		147.9
Brazil		—		10.9		93.2		—		104.1
Chile		(0.1)		—		113.8		—		113.7
Other American countries		10.9		—		1.8		—		12.7
Europe:
Switzerland		276.0		20.3		127.6		—		423.9
Italy		—		3.9		62.9		—		66.8
Spain		106.6		—		20.4		—		127.0
Other European countries		54.2		7.0		110.9		—		172.1
Asia:
China		21.3		—		0.2		—		21.5
Singapore		119.9		6.3		159.7		—		285.9
Japan		(0.8)		—		167.7		—		166.9
Other Asian countries		29.8		0.2		40.5		—		70.5
Total	$	1,425.8	$	175.1	$	1,122.8	$	(42.8)	$	2,680.9


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022
			Mexican
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		Corporate &
	Open-Pit		Unit		Operations		Elimination		Consolidated
The Americas:
Mexico	$	1,390.8	$	356.8	$	—	$	(114.9)	$	1,632.7
United States		1,237.2		37.8		282.3		—		1,557.3
Peru		158.6		—		459.6		(166.6)		451.6
Brazil		—		25.7		319.3		—		345.0
Chile		10.9		—		276.2		—		287.1
Other American countries		28.5		2.2		22.3		—		53.0
Europe:
Switzerland		450.2		33.8		517.8		—		1,001.8
Italy		1.3		13.9		196.5		—		211.7
Spain		290.5		—		36.8		—		327.3
Other European countries		90.9		24.0		143.1		—		258.0
Asia:
China		308.8		—		18.1		—		326.9
Singapore		53.5		8.4		99.1		—		161.0
Japan		51.8		—		379.6		—		431.4
Other Asian countries		111.7		0.4		70.7		—		182.8
Total	$	4,184.7	$	503.0	$	2,821.4	$	(281.5)	$	7,227.6

Table of Contents


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
			Mexican
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		Corporate &
	Open-Pit		Unit		Operations		Elimination		Consolidated
The Americas:
Mexico	$	1,431.7	$	291.8	$	4.5	$	(107.9)	$	1,620.1
United States		1,107.5		42.9		152.2		—		1,302.6
Peru		—		(0.3)		438.9		—		438.6
Brazil		—		18.4		310.8		—		329.2
Chile		2.8		—		265.1		—		267.9
Other American countries		28.9		0.7		4.6		—		34.2
Europe:
Switzerland		888.7		46.0		323.1		—		1,257.8
Italy		0.2		5.9		244.8		—		250.9
Spain		299.8		—		63.8		—		363.6
Other European countries		202.2		40.3		310.8		—		553.3
Asia:
China		125.0		—		25.0		—		150.0
Singapore		354.8		14.8		395.7		—		765.3
Japan		23.6		—		478.1		—		501.7
Other Asian countries		71.4		0.3		203.5		—		275.2
Total	$	4,536.6	$	460.8	$	3,220.9	$	(107.9)	$	8,110.4

The following table presents information regarding the sales value by reporting segment of the Company’s significant products for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021 (in millions):


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2022
			Mexican
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		Corporate, Other &		Total
	Open-pit		Unit		Operations		Eliminations		Consolidated
Copper	$	950.4	$	11.9	$	650.8	$	(3.1)	$	1,610.0
Molybdenum		131.9		—		80.7		—		212.6
Silver		53.8		28.0		20.0		(14.2)		87.6
Zinc		—		100.9		—		0.1		101.0
Other		65.4		18.4		64.2		(2.3)		145.7
Total	$	1,201.5	$	159.2	$	815.7	$	(19.5)	$	2,156.9


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022
			Mexican
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		Corporate, Other &		Total
	Open-pit		Unit		Operations		Eliminations		Consolidated
Copper	$	3,432.8	$	62.3	$	2,282.6	$	(215.0)	$	5,562.7
Molybdenum		388.1		—		298.5		—		686.6
Silver		178.6		101.8		68.4		(56.6)		292.2
Zinc		—		281.5		—		(0.9)		280.6
Other		185.2		57.4		171.9		(9.0)		405.5
Total	$	4,184.7	$	503.0	$	2,821.4	$	(281.5)	$	7,227.6

Table of Contents


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
			Mexican
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		Corporate, Other &		Total
	Open-pit		Unit		Operations		Eliminations		Consolidated
Copper	$	1,195.0	$	24.3	$	912.9	$	(21.8)	$	2,110.4
Molybdenum		146.6		—		147.9		—		294.5
Silver		52.4		37.2		33.6		(19.0)		104.2
Zinc		—		98.6		—		0.1		98.7
Other		31.8		15.0		28.4		(2.1)		73.1
Total	$	1,425.8	$	175.1	$	1,122.8	$	(42.8)	$	2,680.9


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
			Mexican
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		Corporate, Other &		Total
	Open-pit		Unit		Operations		Eliminations		Consolidated
Copper	$	3,858.2	$	75.5	$	2,697.1	$	(54.7)	$	6,576.1
Molybdenum		387.3		—		359.0		—		746.3
Silver		193.1		122.6		95.8		(48.1)		363.4
Zinc		—		215.1		—		0.5		215.6
Other		98.0		47.6		69.0		(5.6)		209.0
Total	$	4,536.6	$	460.8	$	3,220.9	$	(107.9)	$	8,110.4

The opening and closing balances of receivables by reporting segment of the Company were as follows (in millions):


			Mexican
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		Corporate &
	Open-Pit		Unit		Operations		Elimination		Consolidated

As of September 30, 2022:
Trade receivables	$	532.0	$	60.3	$	473.5	$	—	$	1,065.8
Related parties, current		45.1		0.1		0.8		2.1		48.1

As of December 31, 2021:
Trade receivables	$	656.0	$	51.2	$	651.5	$	—	$	1,358.7
Related parties, current		46.9		0.2		—		2.0		49.1

As of September 30, 2022, the Company has long-term contracts with promises to deliver the following ~~new accounting updates~~products in 2022:


Copper concentrates (in tonnes)		110,000
Copper cathodes (in tonnes)		48,000
Molybdenum concentrates (in tonnes)		36,558
Sulfuric acid (in tonnes)		342,058

Provisionally priced sales: At September 30, 2022, the Company has recorded provisionally priced sales of copper at average forward prices per pound, and molybdenum at the September 30, 2022 market price per pound. These sales are subject to final pricing based on the ~~Codification:~~average monthly London Metal Exchange (“LME”), or New York Commodities Exchange (“COMEX”), copper prices and Dealer Oxide molybdenum prices in the future month of settlement.

~~ASU 2017-11:~~ ~~In July 2017,~~Following are the ~~FASB issued ASU 2017-11 “Earnings Per Share” (Topic 260-9), “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” (Topic 480), “Derivatives~~provisionally priced copper and ~~Hedging (Topic 815).~~ molybdenum sales outstanding at September 30, 2022:


	Sales volume	Priced at
	(million lbs.)	(per pound)	Month of settlement
Copper	277.5	3.44	October 2022 through March 2023
Molybdenum	15.4	18.23	October 2022 through January 2023

Table of Contents

The ~~FASB undertook this project to address narrow issues identified~~provisional sales price adjustment included in accounts receivable and net sales as ~~a result~~ of September 30, 2022 includes negative adjustments of $42.0 million for copper and positive adjustments of $26.0 million for molybdenum. Management believes that the ~~complexity associated with applying GAAP for certain financial instruments with characteristics~~final pricing of ~~liability and equity. Part l of the update addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. This update does~~these sales will not have ~~any~~a material effect on the Company’s financial position or on operating results.

NOTE 14 — SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION:

Company ~~financial statements.~~management views Southern Copper as having three reportable segments and manages it on the basis of these segments. The reportable segments identified by the Company are: the Peruvian operations, the Mexican open-pit operations and the Mexican underground mining operations segment identified as the IMMSA unit.

~~Part ll~~The three reportable segments identified are groups of ~~this Update addresses~~mines, each of which constitute an operating segment, with similar economic characteristics, types of products, processes and support facilities, similar regulatory environments, similar employee bargaining contracts and similar currency risks. In addition, each mine within the ~~difficulty~~individual group earns revenues from similar types of ~~navigating Topic 480, distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, because~~customers for their products and services and each group incurs expenses independently, including commercial transactions between groups.

Financial information is regularly prepared for each of the ~~extensive pending content~~three segments and the results of the Company’s operations are regularly reported to the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”) on the segment basis. The CODM of the Company focuses on operating income and on total assets as measures of performance to evaluate different segments and to make decisions to allocate resources to the reported segments. These are common measures in the ~~Codification. The FASB believes this update will improve the readability~~mining industry.

Financial information relating to Southern Copper’s segments is as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2022
	(in millions)
			Mexican				Corporate, other
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		and
	Open-pit		Unit		Operations		eliminations		Consolidated
Net sales outside of segments	$	1,201.5		128.2		815.7		—	$	2,145.4
Intersegment sales		—		31.0		—		(19.5)		11.5
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)		702.8		141.1		511.2		(217.2)		1,137.9
Selling, general and administrative		18.6		2.7		7.5		1.3		30.2
Depreciation, amortization and depletion		96.6		15.1		70.1		10.3		192.0
Exploration		0.6		1.7		3.3		4.0		9.6
Operating income	$	382.9	$	(1.4)	$	223.6	$	182.1		787.2
Less:
Interest, net										(76.4)
Other income (expense)										38.7
Income taxes										(228.5)
Equity earnings of affiliate										(0.1)
Non-controlling interest										(1.9)
Net income attributable to SCC									$	519.0
Capital investment	$	103.2	$	37.8	$	87.8	$	(0.9)	$	227.9
Property and mine development, net	$	4,544.7	$	644.1	$	3,689.8	$	675.9	$	9,554.5
Total assets	$	8,318.9	$	1,079.8	$	4,687.2	$	2,997.3	$	17,083.2

Table of ~~the Codification and reduce its complexity.The amendments in Part ll~~Contents


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2021
	(in millions)
			Mexican				Corporate, other
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		and
	Open-pit		Unit		Operations		eliminations		Consolidated
Net sales outside of segments	$	1,425.8	$	132.3	$	1,122.8	$	—	$	2,680.9
Intersegment sales		—		42.8		—		(42.8)		—
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)		433.4		135.8		406.7		(48.4)		927.5
Selling, general and administrative		17.4		2.9		8.1		2.9		31.3
Depreciation, amortization and depletion		97.8		12.7		83.5		9.4		203.4
Exploration		0.6		1.7		2.7		5.9		10.9
Operating income	$	876.6	$	22.0	$	621.8	$	(12.6)		1,507.8
Less:	��
Interest, net										(87.4)
Other income (expense)										(1.9)
Income taxes										(548.6)
Equity earnings of affiliate										1.3
Non-controlling interest										(3.6)
Net income attributable to SCC									$	867.6
Capital investment	$	114.6	$	29.0	$	97.2	$	2.3	$	243.1
Property and mine development, net	$	4,551.1	$	555.5	$	3,713.0	$	656.5	$	9,476.1
Total assets	$	8,200.6	$	1,009.9	$	4,774.2	$	4,125.6	$	18,110.3


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022
	(in millions)
			Mexican				Corporate, other
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		and
	Open-pit		Unit		Operations		eliminations		Consolidated
Net sales outside of segments	$	4,184.7	$	388.1	$	2,821.4	$	—	$	7,394.2
Intersegment sales		—		114.9		—		(281.5)		(166.6)
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)		1,915.3		386.1		1,560.8		(419.9)		3,442.3
Selling, general and administrative		49.5		7.5		26.0		8.4		91.4
Depreciation, amortization and depletion		289.2		40.8		237.8		29.8		597.6
Exploration		1.7		4.0		14.1		10.7		30.6
Operating income	$	1,929.0	$	64.6	$	982.7	$	89.5		3,065.7
Less:
Interest, net										(240.5)
Other income (expense)										54.4
Income taxes										(1,137.0)
Equity earnings of affiliate										0.3
Non-controlling interest										(6.8)
Net income attributable to SCC									$	1,736.1
Capital investment	$	288.9	$	115.1	$	248.6	$	5.0	$	657.6
Property and mine development, net	$	4,544.7	$	644.1	$	3,689.8	$	675.9	$	9,554.5
Total assets	$	8,318.9	$	1,079.8	$	4,687.2	$	2,997.3	$	17,083.2

Table of ~~the Update do not require any transition guidance because the amendments do not have an accounting effect.~~Contents


	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
	(in millions)
			Mexican				Corporate, other
	Mexican		IMMSA		Peruvian		and
	Open-pit		Unit		Operations		eliminations		Consolidated
Net sales outside of segments	$	4,536.6	$	352.9	$	3,220.9	$	—	$	8,110.4
Intersegment sales		—		107.9		—		(107.9)		—
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)		1,441.6		328.8		1,208.9		(122.5)		2,856.8
Selling, general and administrative		49.7		7.8		27.0		8.4		92.9
Depreciation, amortization and depletion		289.0		39.4		242.6		28.4		599.4
Exploration		1.8		3.8		9.9		11.2		26.7
Operating income	$	2,754.5	$	81.0	$	1,732.5	$	(33.4)		4,534.6
Less:
Interest, net										(262.6)
Other income (expense)										(7.8)
Income taxes										(1,703.8)
Equity earnings of affiliate										14.4
Non-controlling interest										(10.6)
Net income attributable to SCC									$	2,564.2
Capital investment	$	389.6	$	61.5	$	237.6	$	6.8	$	695.5
Property and mine development, net	$	4,551.1	$	555.5	$	3,713.0	$	656.5	$	9,476.1
Total assets	$	8,200.6	$	1,009.9	$	4,774.2	$	4,125.6	$	18,110.3

~~ASU 2017-12:~~ In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12 “Derivatives and Hedging” (Topic 815). The amendments in this update apply to all entities that use hedge accounting in accordance with current GAAP. The FASB has issued this amendment to address stakeholder concerns by improving the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entities risk management activities in its financial statements.

The amendments in this update are effective for the Company in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. As the Company´s hedging activity has been limited in recent years, the adoption of this update should not have a significant impact on the Company´s financial results.

NOTE 14 15 — SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:

Dividends:

On October ~~19, 2017,~~20, 2022, the Board of Directors authorized a dividend of ~~$0.25~~$0.50 per share payable on November ~~22, 2017~~23, 2022 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November ~~8, 2017.~~9, 2022.

Table of Contents

Item 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion provides information that management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of the condensed consolidated financial condition and results of operations of Southern Copper Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, “SCC”, “the Company”, “our”, and “we”). This item should be read in conjunction with our interim unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included in this quarterly report. Additionally, the following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2021.

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Business: Our business is primarily the production and sale of copper. In the process of producing copper, a number of valuable metallurgical by-products are recovered, which we also produce and sell. Market forces outside of our control largely determine the sale prices for our products. Our management, therefore, focuses on value creation through copper production, cost control, production enhancement and maintaining a prudent capital structure to remain profitable. We endeavor to achieve these goals through capital spending programs, exploration efforts and cost reduction programs. Our aim is to remain profitable during periods of low copper prices and to maximize financial performance in periods of high copper prices.

We are one of the world’s largest copper mining companies in terms of production and sales ~~with~~and our principal operations are in Peru and Mexico. We also have ~~active ongoing~~ exploration programs in Chile, Argentina and Ecuador. In addition to copper, we produce significant amounts of other metals, either as a by-product of the copper process or inthrough a number of dedicated mining facilities in Mexico.

Outlook: Various key factors will affect our outcome. These include, but are not limited to, ~~some of~~ the following:

●	Sales structure: In the third quarter of 2022, approximately 77.8% of our revenue came from the sale of copper; 8.9% from molybdenum; 4.1% from silver; 3.8% from zinc; and 5.4% from various other products, including gold, sulfuric acid, and other materials.

●	Copper: In the third quarter of 2022, the LME copper price decreased from an average of $4.25 per pound in the third quarter of 2021 to $3.51 (-17.4%), reflecting concerns about a simultaneous recession in the U.S., Europe and China due to the following factors:

●

On-going interest rate hikes by the FED, the ECB and other relevant central banks to control inflation.

●

A slowdown in the Chinese economy due to Covid-19 restrictions and a weak real estate market.

●

The impact of energy prices on consumer´s demand.

·~~Changes in copper, molybdenum, silver and zinc prices: In~~However, we should note that:

●

The most relevant market intelligence houses for the copper market are expecting a market in balance or with a small deficit for 2022. This assumes a growth in demand of about 2.0% in 2022.

●

Even though we expect the supply will grow 3.5-4.0% next year, mainly due to new projects (as the Quellaveco one, in Peru), there is uncertainty regarding future production growth in Chile and Peru, which together represent about 40% of the global supply.

●

Major warehouses have reported a reduction in copper inventories, which stood at 247,000 tonnes as of September 30. These low inventories represent an extremely low level of consumption.

We believe the ~~nine-month period of 2017, the average LME and COMEX copper prices were $2.70 per pound and $2.71 per pound, about 26.2% and 27.2% higher than~~economic slowdowns in the ~~same period of 2016, respectively. During~~U.S., China and Europe have temporarily weakened the ~~nine months of 2017 per pound LME spot~~demand for copper ~~prices ranged from $2.48~~and are driving reductions in current prices. It is important to ~~$3.13. Average molybdenum, silver and zinc prices~~emphasize that copper plays a leading role in the ~~nine months of 2017 increased 24.5%, 0.3% and 43.2%, respectively, when compared~~global shift to clean energy, which correlates positively with our assertion that the ~~average prices~~underlying demand for copper will be strong in the ~~nine months~~long-term. In this scenario, we believe the current cycle of ~~2016.~~low prices should be short-lived.

·~~Sales structure: In the nine months~~38

Table of 2017, approximately 82% of our revenue came from the sale of copper, 5% from molybdenum, 5% from silver, 5% from zinc and 3% from various other products, including gold, sulfuric acid and other materials.Contents

●	Molybdenum: Represented 9.9% of our sales in the third quarter of 2022 and is currently our most important by-product. Molybdenum prices averaged $16.00 per pound in the third quarter of 2022, compared to $18.43 in the same period of 2021. This represented a 13.2% price decrease.

·~~Copper:~~ During the last quarter, the LME copper price has increased significantly, from an average of $2.57 per pound in the second quarter of 2017 to $2.88 per pound in the third quarter of 2017. We believe this price improvement is the result of the synchronized economic growth recovery, particularly in the capital goods industries.

The latest Chinese data indicates a strong growth in this country. According to China’s Central Bank governor, this country is heading towards a 7% GDP growth for the second half of the year. This compares to a prior market expectation of 6.7%. As China is the world’s largest copper consumer with over 45% of the demand, a higher Chinese GDP growth expectation is good news for our industry. As previously reported, for 2017, we expect refined copper demand to grow about 2.0%.

Regarding ~~supply increases,~~this by-product, we ~~expect~~believe that prices will be supported by lower inventory levels and a weak response as a result of the consistent decline in investments that several companies have had in recent years. In addition to this, labor unrest, excess government taxation and technical difficulties are affecting production. As a result of these factors, we expect a copper market deficit ~~after 2018, giving strong support~~ for ~~prices.~~this year.

·~~Silver~~: Represented 4.2% of our sales in the third quarter of 2017. We believe that silver prices will have support due to its industrial uses as well as its linkage to gold as a value shelter in times of economic uncertainty.

·~~Molybdenum: Represented 5.4% of our sales in the third quarter of 2017. During the third quarter of 2017, the molybdenum price improved its level by 0.6% when compared to the second quarter of 2017.~~

Molybdenum is mainly used ~~for~~in the production of special alloys offor stainless steel that require significant hardness and corrosion and heat resistance. ~~A new use~~New uses for this metal ~~is in~~are associated with lubricants, ~~and~~ sulfur filtering of heavy oils and shale gas production.

●	Silver: Represented 4.1% of our sales in the third quarter of 2022. We believe that the prices for silver will be supported by intensive level of industrial use and the fact that, like gold, it represents value shelter in times of economic uncertainty.

·~~Zinc~~: Represented 3.6% of our sales in the third quarter of 2017. Zinc prices have increased by 43.2% when comparing the first nine months of the year with the same period of 2016. These significant price increments are reflecting the good long term fundamentals of this metal due to its significant industrial consumption and expected mine production shutdowns. It is important to note that in the first nine months of 2017 zinc inventories have consistently decreased, improving this market’s fundamentals.

●	Zinc: Represented 4.7% of our sales in the third quarter of 2022, with an average price of $1.48 per pound in the quarter, a 8.8% increase from the third quarter or 2021. Zinc is currently our third by-product.

●

Production: For 2022, we expect production to reach approximately 900,000 tonnes of copper, which represents a decrease of 3% compared to our 2022 plan. We expect our copper production to bounce back in 2023 and reach 926,100 tonnes of production as we get the Peruvian production back on track and generate new production through our projects at Pilares and Buenavista Zinc Concentrator.

·~~Production~~: For 2017, we have adjusted our production forecast level from 900,000 to 885,000 tons of copper. For 2018, we will initiate production at the new Toquepala concentrator and expect to be able to produce 980,000 tons of copper, continuing our aggressive organic growth program.

We also expect to produce ~~16.1~~25,400 tonnes of molybdenum, which represents a decrease of 16.2% over our 2021 production levels. In 2022, we expect to produce 18.9 million ounces of silver, in line with ~~2016~~our 2021 production ~~of 16.2 million ounces. For zinc production, in 2017, we expect to produce 75,400 tons from our mines, up from 2016’s production, of 73,984 tons.~~level. Additionally, we expect to produce ~~21,200 tons~~63,300 tonnes of ~~molybdenum,~~zinc from our mines.

●

Capital Investments: In the first nine months of 2022, we spent $657.6 million on capital investments; this represented 37.9% of net income and a decrease of 5.4% compared to the amount registered for the same period in 2021. We continue to advance our projects, including the Buenavista Zinc, El Pilar and Pilares projects, which have registered good progress.

CYBERSECURITY

Our operations depend upon information technology systems that may be subject to disruption, damage or failure from different sources, including, without limitation, installation of malicious software, computer viruses, security breaches, cyber-attacks and defects in ~~line with last year’s production~~design. In recent years, cybersecurity incidents have increased in frequency and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in systems, unauthorized release of ~~21,736 tons.~~confidential or otherwise protected information and the corruption of data. We have implemented appropriate preventative measures to mitigate potential risks by implementing an information security management system, which ensures application of controls that are frequently reviewed and tested.

·~~Cost: Our operating costs~~In March 2021, we experienced a Ransomware cyber-attack, which was conducted by individual hackers. This cyber-attack encrypted a total of 420 servers and ~~expenses for the nine months~~units of ~~2017 and 2016 were as follows:~~

Variance

2017

2016

Value

%

Operating costs and expenses ($ in millions)

$
3,001.3

$
2,887.1

$
114.2

4.0
%

~~The increase was mainly~~personal equipment. However, due to ~~higher cost~~the quick response of ~~sales~~our IT team, our Enterprise Resource Planning software was not affected by the aforementioned attack.

After the attack, we immediately began a remediation and recovery process and completely restored the affected servers. The forensic investigation did not identify concrete evidence that any information was stolen during the attack. However, we maintain active lines of cyberintelligence and continue to monitor the DarkWeb/DeepWeb and social networks to identify any publication or activity related to the Company to validate the technological controls affected during the attack and ensure that our systems infrastructure remains secure.

Table of Contents

In March 2021, we appointed a new head of the Information Technology Department, who implemented a new information security strategy to ensure business continuity based on processes (controls and corporate governance framework), technology and human capital (organizational culture). In July 2021, Grupo Mexico appointed a Chief Information Security Officer, who has been actively involved in the development and implementation of this information security strategy. In addition, from July to September of 2021, we performed a cybernetic forensic analysis with the assistance of a professional consulting firm with international experience in this area. The recommendations received were integrated in current information security programs.

Additionally, AMC set up a task force to oversee ongoing initiatives and ensure that targets are met. We are actively following this matter with the task force, our internal audit team and; will also require the expertise of third parties.

Our new information security strategy is being executed on a continuous basis. The compliance, internal control, information technology and internal audit departments are all working together to integrate reference frameworks, risk management models and the necessary controls to continue executing this strategy and corresponding programs. To support our commitment to the strategy, we are working under the international framework for reference and standard, such as ISO, COBIT and NIST, to certify the Company´s security systems. The Company has also established an information security culture with the purpose of training, communicating and maintaining permanent awareness among the workforce. On the governance framework side, the Company has created a Committee of Information Security and set up security policies and standards, among other actions.

For 2022 we have a non-material special budget to continue improvements in this area.

CUAJONE ILLEGAL BLOCKAGE

After the Company resumed operations at our Cuajone facilities in April, a plan to gradually scale up production to recover volume losses was implemented. At this point, we estimate that our Peruvian operations will reach 94% of the 2022 production plan of 360,900 tonnes.

On October 17, the Peruvian government extended the state of emergency in the Moquegua region for 60 more days.

ECONOMIC CONSEQUENCES OF RUSSIA´S INVASION OF UKRAINE

The Ukraine-Russia war that broke out in February of 2022, has generated a series of impacts in the global economy and ~~our IMMSA segment, as well as~~on international trade including, but not limited to, volatility in commodity prices, cost and supply chain pressures and availability and disruption in capital markets. This has forced companies to adjust their supply and commercial plans to deal with shipping delays for goods and higher ~~depreciation, amortization and depletion at our Mexican open-pit operations, partially offset by lower~~prices for the same. The increase in the cost of ~~sales~~oil and energy, coupled with saturation at ~~our Mexican open-pit operations, lower exploration expenses and a $10.2 million credit related~~ports, which was already high due to a ~~previously accrued environmental remediation cost at~~surge in global economic activity after the COVID-19 pandemic ebbed, has driven up the prices of the vast majority of products and generated uncertainty in economies. Although the Company does not currently have operations in Ukraine, Russia or other parts of Europe, this situation is affecting the countries in which we operate and in which our ~~Mexican operations which was reversed~~clients and suppliers operate, although the extent of the impact varies.

The company has experienced increases in costs as a result of the ~~first quarter~~world crisis and the Russian-Ukrainian war, mainly increments in energy, fuel, explosives and other operating material costs. The increase is due to the higher market share of ~~2017.~~Russia in these products. The company has taken initiatives searching for alternative suppliers to reduce this effect. As of September 30, 2022, these events impacted our production costs and financial results as it is disclosed in this report. Currently, our sales program has suffered no impacts.

·~~Capital Investments~~: In the nine months of 2017 we spent $710.4 million on capital investments, 15.5% lower than in the same period of 2016, and represented 69.9% of net income. The year 2017 is the starting point of a new strategic plan: we will increase copper production capacity to exceed the one million ton milestone by mid-2018, and by 2023 we expect to reach 1.5 million tons of copper.

KEY ~~MATTERS:~~MATTERS

WeBelow, we discuss ~~below~~ several matters that we believe are important to understand ~~our~~the results of our operations and financial condition. These matters include, (i) our earnings, (ii) our production, (iii) our “operating cash costs” as a measure of our

Table of Contents

performance, (iv) metal prices, (v) business segments, (vi) the effect of inflation and other local currency issues, and (vii) our capital investment and exploration program.

Earnings: The table below highlights key financial and operational data of our Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021 (in millions, except copper price, percentages and per share amounts):

Three months ended September 30,

Nine months ended September 30,

2017

2016

Variance

% Change

2017

2016

Variance

% Change

Copper price LME

2.88

2.17

0.71

32.7
%
2.70

2.14

0.56

26.2
%
Pounds of copper sold

488.2

505.2

(17.0
)
(3.4
)%
1,468.8

1,460.0

8.8

0.6
%

Net sales

$
1,676.5

$
1,400.7

$
275.8

19.7
%
$
4,790.2

$
3,980.8

$
809.4

20.3
%
Operating income

$
692.6

$
362.4

$
330.2

91.1
%
$
1,788.9

$
1,093.7

$
695.2

63.6
%
Net income attributable to SCC

$
401.8

$
197.6

$
204.2

103.3
%
$
1,016.0

$
604.6

$
411.4

68.0
%
Earnings per share

$
0.52

$
0.26

$
0.26

100.0
%
$
1.31

$
0.78

$
0.53

67.9
%
Dividends per share

$
0.14

$
0.05

$
0.09

180.0
%
$
0.34

$
0.13

$
0.21

161.5
%


		Three months ended September 30,								Nine months ended September 30,
	2022		2021		Variance		% Change		2022		2021		Variance		% Change
Copper price LME		3.51		4.25		(0.74)	(17.4)	%		4.12		4.17		(0.05)	(1.2)	%
Pounds of copper sold		518.6		506.2		12.4	2.4	%		1,407.7		1,550.6		(142.9)	(9.2)	%
Net sales	$	2,156.9	$	2,680.9	$	(524.0)	(19.5)	%	$	7,227.6	$	8,110.4	$	(882.8)	(10.9)	%
Operating income	$	787.2	$	1,507.8	$	(720.6)	(47.8)	%	$	3,065.7	$	4,534.6	$	(1,468.9)	(32.4)	%
Net income attributable to SCC	$	519.0	$	867.6	$	(348.6)	(40.2)	%	$	1,736.1	$	2,564.2	$	(828.1)	(32.3)	%
Earnings per share	$	0.67	$	1.12	$	(0.45)	(40.2)	%	$	2.25	$	3.32	$	(1.07)	(32.2)	%
Dividends per share	$	0.75	$	0.90	$	(0.15)	(16.7)	%	$	3.00	$	2.20	$	0.80	36.4	%

Net sales in the ~~nine months~~third quarter of ~~2017~~2022 were ~~higher~~19.5% lower than in the same period of ~~2016~~2021. This decrease was driven by ~~$809.4 million. This increase was mainly the result of higher~~a drop in average metal prices for copper (-17.4% - LME), molybdenum (-13.2%) and silver (-21.3%) and by a decrease in the sales volumes of molybdenum (-24.2%) and zinc (-11.4%). This effect was slightly offset by higher prices for zinc (+8.8%); and by an increase in the sales volumes of copper (+~~0.6%~~2.4%) and silver (+~~1.7%), partially offset by lower sales volumes of zinc (-4.2%) and molybdenum (-1.7%~~8.3%).

Net income attributable to SCC in the ~~nine months~~third quarter of ~~2017~~2022 was ~~higher~~40.2% lower than in the same period of ~~2016 by $411.4 million.~~2021. This ~~increase~~decrease was ~~principally~~mainly attributable to a drop in average metal prices, a decrease in sales volume of some of our by-products and higher operating costs (+16.8%).

Net sales in the first nine months of 2022 were 10.9% lower than in the same period of 2021, due to a decrease in the sales volume of copper (-9.2%), molybdenum (-12.5%) and silver (-4.8%); and to a decrease in average metal prices for copper (-1.2%) and silver (-14.9%). These negative variances were slightly offset by an increase in sales volume of zinc (+2.2%) and by higher ~~sales.~~average metal prices for molybdenum (+22.5%) and zinc (+26.0%).

Net income attributable to SCC in the first nine months of 2022 was 32.3% lower than in the same period of 2021. This decrease was mainly attributable to a decrease in sales and a 16.4% increase in operating costs.

Production: The table below highlights our mine production data for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016:~~2021:


	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
	2022	2021	Variance	% Change		2022	2021	Variance	% Change
Copper (in million pounds)	508.2	540.5	(32.3)	(6.0)	%	1,440.6	1,588.8	(148.2)	(9.3)	%
Molybdenum (in million pounds)	13.4	17.9	(4.5)	(24.8)	%	43.0	49.1	(6.1)	(12.5)	%
Silver (in million ounces)	4.9	4.8	0.1	0.6	%	13.6	14.4	(0.8)	(5.8)	%
Zinc (in million pounds)	32.8	37.2	(4.4)	(11.9)	%	98.7	111.3	(12.6)	(11.3)	%

Three months ended September 30,

Nine months ended September 30,

Variance

Variance

2017

2016

Volume

%

2017

2016

Volume

%

Copper (in million pounds)

488.5

495.8

(7.3
)
(1.5
)%
1,435.1

1,482.3

(47.2
)
(3.2
)%
Molybdenum (in million pounds)

11.9

12.3

(0.4
)
(3.4
)%
35.4

36.3

(0.9
)
(2.4
)%
Silver (in million ounces)

4.2

4.0

0.2

4.2
%
12.2

12.1

0.1

0.4
%
Zinc (in million pounds)

40.5

41.6

(1.1
)
(2.5
)%
120.8

125.4

(4.6
)
(3.7
)%

Table of Contents

The table below highlights our ~~copper~~mine production data for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016 (in million pounds):~~2021:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
			Variance						Variance
	2017	2016	Volume		%		2017	2016	Volume		%


													Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
Copper (in million pounds):													2022	2021	Variance	% Change		2022	2021	Variance	% Change
Toquepala	82.6	73.4	9.2		12.4	%	239.2	229.4	9.8		4.3	%	109.4	130.4	(21.0)	(16.1)	%	320.2	389.0	(68.8)	(17.7)	%
Cuajone	87.8	94.0	(6.2	)	(6.6	)%	253.6	281.4	(27.8	)	(9.9	)%	92.7	98.8	(6.1)	(6.1)	%	215.2	279.5	(64.3)	(23.0)	%
La Caridad	73.5	73.8	(0.3	)	(0.4	)%	220.9	221.2	(0.3	)	(0.1	)%	60.8	68.5	(7.7)	(11.3)	%	183.7	213.8	(30.1)	(14.0)	%
Buenavista	241.4	251.1	(9.7	)	(3.9	)%	711.7	739.5	(27.8	)	(3.8	)%	239.7	237.8	1.9	0.8	%	706.3	691.6	14.7	2.1	%
IMMSA	3.2	3.5	(0.3	)	(8.4	)%	9.7	10.8	(1.1	)	(10.3	)%	5.6	5.0	0.6	13.2	%	15.2	14.9	0.3	1.6	%
Total	488.5	495.8	(7.3	)	(1.5	)%	1,435.1	1,482.3	(47.2	)	(3.2	)%
Total mined copper													508.2	540.5	(32.3)	(6.0)	%	1,440.6	1,588.8	(148.2)	(9.3)	%

Third ~~quarter~~:quarter: Mined copper production in the third quarter of ~~2017 decreased by 1.5%~~2022 fell 6.0% to ~~488.5~~508.2 million pounds compared to ~~495.8~~540.5 million pounds in the third quarter of ~~2016.~~2021. This ~~decrease~~ was ~~due to:~~

· ~~Lower production at the Cuajone mine due~~mainly attributable to a decrease in copper production at our Toquepala (-16.1%), La Caridad (-11.3%) and Cuajone (-6.1%) operations, which was in turn driven by lower ore grades and ~~higher ore hardness index, which caused lower~~ recoveries.

· ~~Lower~~ This was slightly offset by an increase of production at our ~~Mexican mines principally due~~Buenavista (+0.8%) and IMMSA (+13.2%) mines.

Molybdenum production decreased 24.8% in the third quarter of 2022 compared to ~~lower SX-EW~~the levels registered in the third quarter of 2021. This was attributable to a decrease in production at ~~the~~our Toquepala (-55.7%), La Caridad (-10.0%) and Buenavista ~~mine as~~(-6.4%) mines, which was mainly driven by a ~~result of lower PLS processed~~drop in ore grades and ~~lower copper content.~~

· ~~The decrease in production~~recoveries. This effect was partially offset by ~~higher~~an increase in production at ~~the Toquepala~~our Cuajone (+2.4%) mine due to higher ore ~~grades and recoveries.~~grades.

~~Molybdenum~~Silver mine production ~~decreased 3.4%~~increased 0.6% in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2022, compared with the same period of 2021, this was mainly attributable to ~~11.9 million pounds, compared to 12.3 million pounds~~an increase in ~~the third quarter of 2016 due to lower production at the Toquepala and La Caridad mines as a result of lower ore grades.~~

~~Silver mine production increased by 4.2% in the third quarter of 2017 as a result of higher~~ production at our ~~open-pit mines in Mexico~~Buenavista (+20.2%) mine and ~~Peru.~~at the IMMSA (+0.9%) unit. This was offset by lower production at our ~~IMMSA~~Toquepala (18.7%), Cuajone (-10.4%) and La Caridad (-1.9%) mines.

Zinc production decreased ~~2.5%~~11.9% in the third quarter of ~~2017, due~~2022 compared with the same period in 2021.

This decrease was mainly attributable to ~~lower mineral processed~~a drop in production at ~~Santa Eulalia mine~~the Charcas and Santa Barbara ~~mine.~~units, which was attributable to a decrease in processed material and lower average zinc grades.

Santa Barbara Mine: In a collective action with the authorities of the State of Chihuahua, Mexico, it has been possible to close 42 illegal accesses to the mine, thus preventing the theft of mineral in stone. From September 24 to September 30, the authorities seized seven people during the crime. These acts did not constitute a permanent appropriation of the buildings or surfaces owned by IMMSA nor stop the ordinary course of production.

Nine months: ~~Copper mine~~Mined copper production in the first nine months of ~~2017~~2022 decreased ~~3.2%~~9.3% to ~~1,435.1~~1,440.6 million pounds ~~from 1,482.3~~compared to 1,588.8 million pounds in the same period of ~~2016.~~2021. This decrease was ~~due to:~~

· ~~Lower production at~~mainly attributable to the Cuajone mine stoppage (-23.0%) and to a drop in production at our Toquepala (-17.7%) and La Caridad (-14.0%) mines due to lower ~~ore grades~~grades. This effect was slightly offset by an increase in production at Buenavista (+2.1%) and ~~recoveries.~~IMMSA (+1.6%) operations.

· ~~Lower~~

Molybdenum production decreased 12.5% in the first nine months of 2022 compared to the same period in 2021; this was mainly due to lower production at our ~~Mexican~~Cuajone (-21.4%), Toquepala (-21.1%) and La Caridad (-8.2%) mines, ~~principally lower SX-EW production at the Buenavista mine due to lower PLS processed with a lower copper content.~~

· ~~The decrease in production~~which was partially offset by higher production at ~~the Toquepala~~Buenavista (+3.4%) mine.

Silver mine ~~due to higher ore grades and recoveries.~~

~~Molybdenum~~ production decreased ~~2.4%~~5.8% in the first nine months of ~~2017 compared to the same period of 2016,~~2022; this was principally due to lower production at our ~~Peruvian~~Toquepala (-23.6%), Cuajone (-22.0%), La Caridad (-6.8%) and IMMSA (-2.0%) operations, ~~as a result of lower grades and recoveries. This decrease~~which was partially offset by ~~the additional production from the Buenavista molybdenum plant at the second concentrator which started production in July 2016.~~

~~Silver mine production increased 0.4% in the nine months of 2017 as result of~~ higher production at ~~our open-pit mines in Mexico and Peru. This was offset by lower production at our IMMSA mines, principally at Santa Barbara~~Buenavista (+9.1%) mine.

Zinc production decreased ~~3.7%~~11.3% in the first nine months of ~~2017~~2022 due to a drop in production at our Charcas, San Martin and Santa Barbara mines, which was principally due to lower ~~production at our Santa Eulalia and Santa Barbara mines due to lower mineral milled and lower~~ grades.

Table of Contents

Operating Cash Costs: An overall benchmark ~~used by us and~~that we use, which is a common industry metric to measure performance is operating cash costs per pound of copper produced. Operating cash cost is a non-GAAP measure that does not have a standardized meaning and may not be comparable to similarly titled measures provided by other companies. This non-GAAP information should not be considered in isolation or as substitute for measures of performance determined in accordance with GAAP. A reconciliation of our operating cash cost per pound of copper produced to the cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) as presented in the ~~condensed~~ consolidated statement of earnings is presented under the subheading, “Non-GAAP Information Reconciliation” on page ~~47.~~58. We disclose operating cash cost per pound of copper produced, both before and net of by-product revenues.

We define operating cash cost per pound of copper produced before by-product revenues as cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion), plus selling, general and administrative charges, treatment and refining charges net of sales premiums; less the cost of purchased concentrates, workers’ participation and other miscellaneous charges, including royalty charges, and the change in inventory levels; divided by total pounds of copper produced by our own mines.

In our calculation of operating cash cost per pound of copper produced, we exclude depreciation, amortization and depletion, which are considered non-cash expenses. Exploration is considered a discretionary expenditure and is also excluded. Workers’ participation provisions are determined on the basis of pre-tax earnings and are also excluded. Additional exclusions from operating cash costs are items of a non-recurring nature and the mining royalty charge as it is based on various calculations of taxable income, depending on which jurisdiction, Peru or Mexico, is imposing the charge. We believe these adjustments allow our management and stakeholders to more fully visualize our controllable cash cost, which we believe is one of the lowest of all copper-producing companies of similar size.

We define operating cash cost per pound of copper produced net of by-product revenues as operating cash cost per pound of copper produced, as defined in the previous paragraph, less by-product revenues and net revenue (loss) on sale of metal purchased from third parties.

In our calculation of operating cash cost per pound of copper produced, ~~before~~net of by-product revenues, we credit against our costs the revenues from the sale of all our by-products, including, molybdenum, zinc, silver, gold, etc. and the net revenue (loss) on sale of metals purchased from third parties. We disclose this measure including the by-product revenues in this way because we consider our principal business to be the production and sale of copper. As part of our copper production process, much of our by-products are recovered. These by-products, as well as the processing of copper purchased from third parties, are a supplemental part of our production process and their sales value contribute to ~~cover~~covering part of our incurred fixed ~~costs incurred.~~costs. We believe that our Company is viewed by the investment community as a copper company, and is valued, in large part, by the investment community’s view of the copper market and our ability to produce copper at a reasonable cost.

We believe that both of these measures are useful tools for our management and our stakeholders. Our cash costs before by-product revenues allow us to monitor our cost structure and address ~~with operating management~~ areas of ~~concern.~~concern within operating management. The measure operating cash cost per pound of copper produced net of by-product revenues is a common measure used in the copper industry and is a useful management tool that allows us to track our performance and better allocate our resources. This measure is also used in our investment project evaluation process to determine a project’s potential contribution to our operations, its competitiveness and its relative strength in different price scenarios. The expected contribution of by-products is generally a significant factor used by the copper industry ~~in determining~~to determine whether to move forward ~~with~~or not in the development of a new mining project. As the price of our by-product commodities can have significant fluctuations from period to period, the value of its contribution to our costs can be volatile.

Table of Contents

Our operating cash cost per pound of copper produced, before and net of by-product revenues, is presented in the table below for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016.~~2021:

Operating cash cost per pound of copper produced (1)

(In millions, except cost per pound and percentages)


		Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2022		2021		Variance		% Change		2022		2021		Variance		% Change
Total operating cash cost before by‑product revenues	$	1,005.6	$	847.1	$	158.5	18.7	%	$	2,794.5	$	2,436.4	$	358.1	14.7	%
Total by‑product revenues	$	(501.1)	$	(543.4)	$	42.3	(7.8)	%	$	(1,549.9)	$	(1,458.2)	$	(91.7)	6.3	%
Total operating cash cost net of by‑product revenues	$	504.5	$	303.7	$	200.8	66.1	%	$	1,244.6	$	978.2	$	266.4	27.2	%
Total pounds of copper produced(2)		487.8		522.5		(34.7)	(6.7)	%		1,388.5		1,541.0		(152.5)	(9.9)	%
Operating cash cost per pound before by‑product revenues	$	2.06	$	1.62	$	0.44	27.2	%	$	2.01	$	1.58	$	0.43	27.3	%
By‑products per pound revenues	$	(1.03)	$	(1.04)	$	0.01	(1.2)	%	$	(1.11)	$	(0.94)	$	(0.17)	18.0	%
Operating cash cost per pound net of by‑product revenues	$	1.03	$	0.58	$	0.45	77.9	%	$	0.90	$	0.64	$	0.26	41.1	%

(1)	These are non-GAAP measures. Please see page 58 for reconciliation to GAAP measure.

(2)	Net of metallurgical losses.

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

Variance

Variance

2017

2016

Value

%

2017

2016

Value

%

Total operating cash cost before by-product revenues

$
684.5

$
692.2

$
(7.7
)
(1.1
)%
$
2,077.2

$
2,064.5

$
12.7

0.6
%
Total by-product revenues

$
(257.3
)
$
(253.2
)
$
(4.1
)
1.6
%
$
(787.4
)
$
(705.8
)
$
(81.6
)
11.6
%
Total operating cash cost net of by-product revenues

$
427.2

$
439.0

$
(11.8
)
(2.7
)%
$
1,289.8

$
1,358.7

$
(68.9
)
(5.1
)%

Total pounds of copper produced (2)

473.8

476.8

(3.0
)
(0.6
)%
1,393.0

1,440.8

(47.8
)
(3.3
)%

Operating cash cost per pound before by-product revenues

$
1.45

$
1.45

—

—

$
1.49

$
1.43

$
0.06

4.2
%
By-products per pound revenues

$
(0.55
)
$
(0.53
)
$
(0.02
)
3.8
%
$
(0.56
)
$
(0.49
)
$
(0.07
)
14.3
%
Operating cash cost per pound net of by-product revenues

$
0.90

$
0.92

$
(0.02
)
(2.2
)%
$
0.93

$
0.94

$
(0.01
)
(1.1
)%

~~(1)~~ ~~These are non-GAAP measures. Please see page 47 for reconciliation to GAAP measure.~~

~~(2)~~ ~~Net of metallurgical losses.~~

As seen onin the table above, our per pound cash cost ~~per pound~~ before by-product revenues ~~was $1.45~~ in the third quarter of ~~2017 and 2016. However, our per pound cash cost, when calculated net of by-product revenues,~~2022 was ~~$0.90 in the third quarter of 2017, two cents lower than in the same period of 2016. This was the result of higher prices for our major by-products.~~

~~Our cash cost per pound before by-product revenues in the nine months of 2017 was $1.49, 4.2%~~27.2% higher than in the same period of ~~2016.~~2021. This increase was mainly attributable to an increase in ~~operating cash cost was the result of~~production costs and the unit cost effect generated by a 6.7% decrease in pounds of ~~3.3% lower production, higher treatment and refining charges and higher production costs,~~copper produced. Our cash cost per pound net of by-product revenue for the third quarter of 2022 increased 77.9% when compared to the same period of 2021. This was mainly due to higher ~~diesel~~costs of fuel, energy and ~~natural gas costs, partially reduced by~~explosives, lower ~~costs per pound from selling, general~~production explained above and ~~administrative expenses. However,~~a decrease in all our ~~per pound cash cost for~~main by-product revenues except sulfuric acid.

For the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, when calculated net of~~2022, our per pound cash cost before by-product revenues was ~~slightly lower~~27.3% higher than in the same period of ~~2016 despite the~~2021. This increase was mainly driven by an increase in ~~our~~ production ~~costs.~~costs and the unit cost effect generated by a 9.9% decrease in pounds of copper produced. The operating cash cost per pound of copper net of by product revenue was $0.90 in the nine months ended September 30, 2022. This ~~was~~represented an increase of 41.1% compared to the ~~result~~$0.64 reported in the same period of 2021. These results were mainly due to higher ~~prices for our major by-products.~~production costs and the unit cost effect generated by a 9.9% decrease in pounds of copper produced partially offset by an increase of 18% in by-product revenue.

Metal Prices: The profitability of our operations is dependent on, and our financial performance is significantly affected by, the international market prices for the products we produce, ~~especially~~and for copper, molybdenum, zinc and ~~silver.~~silver in particular.

We are subject to market risks arising from the volatility of copper and other metal prices. For the remaining three months of ~~2017,~~2022, assuming that expected metal production and sales are achieved, ~~that~~ tax rates ~~are~~remain unchanged and ~~giving~~ no ~~effect to~~effects are generated by potential hedging programs, metal price sensitivity factors would indicate the following change in estimated net income attributable to SCC resulting from metal price changes:

	Copper		Zinc		Molybdenum		Silver
Change in metal prices (per pound except silver �� per ounce)	$	0.10	$	0.10	$	1.00	$	1.00

									Copper		Molybdenum		Zinc		Silver
Change in metal prices (per pound except silver—per ounce)									$	0.10	$	1.00	$	0.10	$	1.00
Change in net earnings (in millions)	$	29.4	$	3.7	$	6.6	$	2.3	$	31.1	$	7.8	$	3.7	$	2.9

Table of Contents

Business Segments: We view our Company as having three reportable segments and manage it on the basis of these segments. These segments are (1) our Peruvian operations, (2) our Mexican open-pit operations and (3) our Mexican underground operations, known as our IMMSA unit. Our Peruvian operations include the Toquepala and Cuajone mine complexes and the smelting and refining plants, industrial railroad and port facilities that service both mines. The Peruvian operations produce copper, with significant by-product production of molybdenum, silver and other material. Our Mexican open-pit operations include La Caridad and Buenavista mine complexes, the smelting and refining plants and support facilities, which service both mines. The Mexican open pit operations produce copper, with significant by-product production of molybdenum, silver and other material. Our IMMSA unit includes five underground mines that produce zinc, lead, copper, silver and gold, ~~a coal mine which produces coal and coke,~~ and several industrial processing facilities for zinc, copper and silver.

Segment information is included in our review of “Results of Operations” in this item and also in Note 1014 “Segment and Related Information” of our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Inflation and Exchange Rate Effect of the Peruvian Sol and the Mexican Peso: Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar and our revenues are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars. Significant portions of our operating costs are denominated in Peruvian sol and Mexican pesos. Accordingly, when inflation and currency devaluation/appreciation of the Peruvian currency

and Mexican currency occur, our operating results can be affected. In recent years, we do believe such changes have not had a material effect on our results and financial position. Please see Item 3. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” for more detailed information.

Capital Investment Programs: We made capital investments of ~~$710.4~~$657.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, ~~2017,~~2022, compared ~~with $840.5~~to $695.5 million in the same period of ~~2016.~~2021. In general, the capital investments and investment projects described below are intended to increase production, decrease costs or address social and environmental commitments.

Set forth below are descriptions of some of our current expected capital investment programs. We expect to meet the cash requirements for these projects ~~from~~by utilizing cash on ~~hand,~~hand; internally generated funds and ~~from~~ additional external ~~financing, if necessary.~~financing. All capital spending plans will continue to be reviewed and adjusted to respond to changes in the economy orand market conditions.

Projects in Mexico:

~~Buenavista Quebalix IV - Sonora: The project consisted of a C~~~~rushing, Conveying and Spreading System for Leachable Ore (Quebalix IV)~~, which has been completed on time and under budget and is currently operating steadily. This project will reduce mining costs as well as increase SX-EW copper recovery, allowing the Buenavista unit to reach its copper production capacity of 500,000 tons.

Buenavista Zinc - ~~Sonora~~:Sonora: This project is located within the Buenavista facility and ~~contemplates~~includes the development of a new concentrator to produce approximately ~~80,000 tons~~100,000 tonnes of zinc and 20,000 ~~tons~~tonnes of copper per ~~year that~~year. We have completed the engineering study. All the main equipment is on site and construction site works are in progress. The project has all the necessary permits and the capital budget is $413 million. When completed, this new facility will ~~allow us to~~ double ~~our current~~the Company’s zinc production ~~capacity.~~capacity and will provide 490 direct jobs and 1,470 indirect jobs. We ~~have concluded the basic engineering and we are working on the detailed engineering of the project. We estimate an investment of $413 million for this project and~~ expect to initiate operations byin the ~~first~~second half of ~~2020.~~2023. As of September 30, 2022, we have invested $292.4 million in this project, where physical completion is at 83%.

Pilares - Sonora:~~This project, located~~ Located six kilometers ~~away~~ from La Caridad, ~~will be developed as~~this project consists of an open-pit mine ~~operation.~~

~~The ore~~operation with an annual production capacity of 35,000 tonnes of copper in concentrate. A new 25-meter wide off-road facility for mining trucks has been built and will be ~~transported by truck~~used to transport the ore from the pit to the primary crushers ofat the La Caridad copper ~~concentrator,~~concentrator. This project will significantly ~~improving~~improve the ~~over-all~~overall mineral ore grade ~~(from 0.34% at La Caridad to~~(combining the 0.78% expected from ~~Pilares)~~Pilares with 0.29% from La Caridad). ~~During~~The budget for Pilares is $159 million. As of September 30, 2022, the ~~third quarter~~project was 95% complete and has obtained all permits and licenses required. Pilares has initiated operations and is currently mining copper oxides and mineral to be processed.

El Pilar - Sonora: This low-capital intensity copper greenfield project is strategically located in Sonora, Mexico, approximately 45 kilometers from our Buenavista mine. Its copper oxide mineralization contains estimated proven and probable reserves of ~~2017, we continued to advance on required pre-construction activities, including final outline design for the road through which the~~317 million tonnes of ore with an average copper grade of 0.249%. We anticipate that El Pilar will ~~be transported to the La Caridad mill. An investment~~operate as a conventional open-pit mine with an annual production capacity of ~~$159 million is estimated to produce 34,500 tons~~36,000 tonnes of copper ~~per year.~~cathodes. This operation will use highly cost efficient and environmentally friendly SX-EW technology. The budget for El Pilar is $310 million. We expect this project to start production in 2024 with an expected mine life of 13 years. The results from

Table of Contents

experimental pads in leaching process have confirmed adequate levels of copper recovery. The basic engineering study is finished and the Company continues developing the project and engage in onsite environmental activities. The SX-EW plant EPCM project has been awarded to a contractor and has started.

Lime plant - Sonora: As part of our cost improvement projects, we are building a new lime plant with a production capacity of 600 metric tonnes per day, which will be the largest lime plant of Mexico. This facility will allow us to reduce to approximately 50% our current lime cost at our Mexican operations. The total budget for the plant is $65.5 million, of which we have invested $57.7 million as of September 30, 2022. The furnace of the plant started operations in the second quarter, ~~of 2019.~~complying with the performance tests.

Projects in Peru:

~~We currently have five major copper projects~~Quebrada Honda dam expansion – Tacna: This project aims to enlarge the main and lateral dams in ~~Peru,~~Quebrada Honda and includes the relocation and repowered of some facilities due to dam growth and implementation of other facilities for water recovery, among other factors. As of September 30, 2022, pre-commissioning and commissioning activities are in progress with work on three fronts. This project has a total ~~capital~~ budget ~~for these projects~~ of ~~$2,900~~$179.4 million, ~~out~~ of which ~~$1,426 million have been already invested.~~

~~Toquepala Expansion Project - Tacna~~: This $1.2 billion project includes a new state-of-the-art concentrator which will increase Toquepala’s annual copper production by 100,000 tons to 217,000 tons in 2018 and 260,000 tons in 2019. Through September 30, 2017, we have invested ~~$743.5~~$155.4 million ~~in this expansion. The project has reached 80% progress and is expected to be completed by the second quarter of 2018.~~

~~The project to improve the crushing process at Toquepala with the installation of a~~ ~~High Pressure Grinding Roll (HPGR)~~ system, has as its main objective, to ensure that our existing concentrator will operate at its maximum annual production capacity of 117,000 tons of copper while reducing operating costs through ore crushing efficiencies, even with an increase of the ore material hardness index. The budget for this project is $50 million and as of September 30, ~~2017, we have invested $32.2 million~~2022.

Tia Maria - Arequipa: This greenfield project, located in ~~this project. We expect that it~~Arequipa, Peru, will ~~be completed by the first quarter of 2018.~~

~~Cuajone Projects — Moquegua: The~~ ~~Heavy Mineral Management Optimizing Project~~ consists of installing a primary crusher at the Cuajone mine pit with a seven kilometer overland conveyor belt system for moving the ore to the concentrator. The project is optimizing the hauling process by replacing rail haulage, thereby reducing operating and maintenance costs as well as the environmental impactuse state of the ~~Cuajone mine. The crusher has a processing capacity~~art SX-EW technology with the highest international environmental standards to produce 120,000 tonnes of ~~43.8 million tons~~SX- EW copper cathodes per year. ~~As of September 30, 2017,~~The estimated capital budget for the project is ~~completed~~$1.4 billion.

The Company has been consistently working to promote the welfare of the Islay province population. As part of these efforts, we have implemented successful social programs in education, healthcare and ~~initiating operations.~~productive development to improve the quality-of-life in the region. We have ~~invested $195.0 million in this project out of the approved capital budget of $215.5 million.~~

~~The~~ ~~Cuajone tailing thickeners~~ ~~project at the concentrator will replace two of the three existing thickeners with a new hi-rate thickener. The purpose is to streamline the concentrator flotation process~~also promoted agricultural and improve water recovery efficiency, increasing the tailings solids content from 54% to 61%, thereby reducing fresh water consumption and replacing it with recovered water. Equipment assembly is completed and we arelivestock activities in the ~~commissioning process. As~~Tambo Valley and supported growth in manufacturing, fishing and tourism in Islay.

We reiterate our view that the initiation of ~~September 30, 2017, we have invested~~

~~$24.4 million in this project out of the approved capital budget of $30 million. We expect it to be completed by the end of the fourth quarter of 2017.~~

~~Tailings disposal~~construction activities at ~~Quebrada Honda - Moquegua: This project increases the height of the existing Quebrada Honda dam to impound future tailings from the Toquepala and Cuajone mills and~~Tia Maria will ~~extend the expected life of this tailings facility by 25 years. The first stage and construction of the drainage system~~generate significant economic opportunities for the ~~lateral dam~~Islay province and the Arequipa region. Given the current Peruvian economic situation, it is ~~finished.~~crucial to move ahead on projects that will stimulate a sustainable growth cycle. We ~~finished~~will make it a priority to hire local labor to fill the ~~second stage with~~9,000 jobs that we expect to generate during Tia Maria’s construction phase. Additionally, from day one of our operations, we will generate significant contributions to revenues in the installation of a new cyclone battery station that allows us to place more slurry at the dams. We are in a bidding process for a new stage which will improve the operational processes. The project has a total budgeted cost of $116.0 million. Arequipa region.

Potential projects

We have ~~invested $81.0 million through September 30, 2017 and expect the project to be completed by the second quarter of 2018.~~

~~Potential projects~~

~~We have~~ a number of other projects that we may develop in the future. We continuously evaluate new projects on the basis of our long-term corporate objectives, expected return on investment, environmental concerns, required investment and estimated production, among other considerations. All capital spending plans will continue to be reviewed and adjusted to respond to changes in the economy orand market conditions.

El ~~Arco:~~Arco - Baja California: This is a ~~world class~~world-class copper deposit located in the central part of the Baja California peninsula with ore reserves of over ~~2.7 billion tons~~1,230 million tonnes with an average ore grade of ~~0.399%~~0.40% and ~~0.11 grams~~141 million tonnes of ~~gold per ton. This~~leach material with an average ore grade of 0.27%. The project includes an open-pit mine ~~combining~~with a combined concentrator and SX-EW ~~operations with an estimated~~operations. Annual production ofis expected to total 190,000 ~~tons~~tonnes of copper and 105,000 ounces of gold annually. Between July 2015 and February 2016, we conducted a drilling program of 20,170 meters in order to further define the deposit at lower depths of between 300 and 600 meters. During the balance of 2017 and in 2018, we expect to conduct further exploration activities. In addition, we will begin an engineering study to define optimization alternatives for the project and update the feasibility study.

~~El Pilar~~: This is a fully permitted, low capital intensity copper development project strategically located in Sonora, Mexico, approximately 45 kilometers from our Buenavista mine. Its copper oxide mineralization contains estimated proven and probable reserves of 325 million tons of ore with an average copper grade of 0.287%. El Pilar will operate as a conventional open-pit mine and copper cathodes will be produced using the highly cost efficient and environmentally friendly SX-EW technology. Average annual production is currently estimated at 35,000 tons of copper cathodes over an initial 13-year mine life, with start of commercial operations forecasted for 2019. On a preliminary basis, we estimate a development investment of approximately $310 million. In 2016, we conducted a diamond drilling program of 3,700 meters and a geophysical survey of 40 kilometers in order to confirm the reserves. Additionally, the results allowed us to identify potential new areas of interest. During the first half of 2017, we initiated a reserve estimation program. In July 2017, we started a 20,000 meter drilling program focused on further assessing the geophysical anomalies detected in the exploration program of 2016. We also continue with the metallurgical testing program.

~~Tia Maria:~~ ~~We have~~gold. The Company has completed ~~engineering and after having complied with all environmental requirements, we have obtained the approval of~~ the environmental impact ~~assessment. We are working jointly~~assessment, which will be filed with the Peruvian Government to obtain the construction license for this 120,000 tons of SX-EW copper per year greenfield project with a total capital investment of $1,400 million. We expect the license to be issued in the first quarter 2018.authorities shortly.

This greenfield project, located in Arequipa, Peru, will use state of the art SX-EW technology with the highest international environmental standards. SX-EW facilities are the most environmentally friendly in the industry due to their technical process and consequently no emissions into the atmosphere are released. The project will use seawater, transporting it more than 25 kilometers and at 1,000 meters above sea level. The construction of the desalinization plant requires an investment of approximately $95 million.

We expect the project to generate 3,500 jobs during the construction phase. When in operation, Tia Maria will directly employ 600 workers and indirectly provide jobs to another 2,000. Through its expected twenty-year life, the project related services will create significant business opportunities in the Arequipa region. Tia Maria has complied with all existing requirements and regulations and therefore the Company trusts that it will soon receive from government authorities the construction licenses and permits required in order to begin construction of this project.

Los ~~Chancas.~~Chancas - Apurimac: This greenfield project, located in Apurimac, Peru, is a copper and molybdenum porphyry deposit. Current estimates ~~indicate the presence~~ of ~~545~~indicated copper mineral resources are 98 million ~~tons~~tonnes of ~~mineralized material~~oxides with a copper content of ~~0.59%, molybdenum content~~0.45% and 52 million tonnes of ~~0.04% and 0.039 grams of gold per ton as well as, 181 million tons of mineralized leachable material~~sulfides with a ~~total~~ copper content of ~~0.357%~~0.59%. The Los Chancas project envisions an open-pit mine with a combined operation of concentrator and SX-EW processes to

produce ~~100,000 tons~~130,000 tonnes of copper and ~~4,500 tons~~7,500 tonnes of ~~molybdenum.~~molybdenum anually. The estimated capital investment is ~~$2,800~~$2,600 million and the project is expected to be in operation in ~~2022.~~2027. In ~~2016,~~2022, we continued ~~with the development of~~to engage in social and environmental ~~programs~~improvements for the local communities and worked on the project´s environmental impact assessment.

Table of Contents

In February 2022, a group of illegal miners occupied a portion of the project’s lands and began to produce copper through a small-scale artisanal process. On May 31, 2022, a group of people attacked the project mining camp causing a fire, which completely destroyed the installations. As of September 30, 2022 part of the project´s land continued to be occupied by illegal miners, some of whom have irregularly registered their stakes in the "Integral Registry of Mining Formalization" (REINFO). The Company has filed criminal complaints and other legal remedies, which have annulled the claims of 43 illegal miners while 32 cases remain open.

Michiquillay Project - Cajamarca: In June 2018, Southern Copper signed a contract for the acquisition of the Michiquillay project in Cajamarca, Peru. Michiquillay is a world class mining project with inferred mineral resources of 2,288 million tonnes with an estimated copper grade of 0.43%. When developed, we expect Michiquillay to produce 225,000 tonnes of copper per year (along with by-products of molybdenum, gold and silver) for an initial mine life of more than 25 years and at a competitive cash-cost. We estimate an investment of approximately $2.5 billion will be required and expect production start-up by 2029. Michiquillay will become one of Peru´s largest copper mines and will create significant business opportunities in the Cajamarca region; generate new jobs for the local communities; and contribute taxes and royalties to the local, regional and national governments.

In 2021, the Company signed Social Agreements with the ~~local communities.~~Michiquillay and the Encañada Communities. In addition, on October 1, 2021, the ~~third quarter~~Peruvian Ministry of ~~2017, we contracted a consulting firm to develop~~Energy and Mines approved the ~~environmental impact assessment~~semi-detailed Environmental Impact Study for the project. These events will allow Southern Copper to initiate an in-depth exploration program in November 2022.

The above information is based on estimates only. We cannot make any assurances that we will undertake any of these projects or that the information noted is accurate.

ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE (“ESG”)

At Southern Copper, we have strengthened governance relative to sustainable development. The Sustainable Development Committee, which is presided by an independent member of the board, held its first session on October 14, 2022. During this encounter, our counselors reviewed our advances in terms of our main performance indicators and gave us recommendations for the climate change strategy we are building.

We adhered to the United Nations (UN) Global Compact. Through the affiliation of AMC, our holding corporation,we reaffirm our commitment to align our policies, strategies, and operations with the Ten Principles of the Global Compact, addressing such issues as human rights, labor rights, the environment and anti-corruption. Our adherence of the Global Compact will also position us to further our contributions to the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement.

Regarding climate change, we are actively collaborating with the International Copper Association (ICA) to define the Global Copper Decarbonization Roadmap, which is aligned with the Paris Agreement. The results of these efforts have nurtured our medium and long-term objectives and will be published in the first quarter of 2023.

Since ,occupational safety is a priority for the Company, the Mexican Government awarded our Caridad metallurgical operation, located in Sonora, Mexico, the distinction of “Safe and Healthy Workplace.” The Company was recognized for its voluntary program to implement strategies and actions to improve the safety, health and wellbeing of our workers while bolstering the productivity and quality of the workplace. The precious metals plant, which is part of the aforementioned complex, received the Casco de Plata (Silver Helmet) in the category “Smelters with less than 500 workers,” which was awarded by the Mining Chamber of Mexico in recognition of the fact that the plant was the best performer on the occupational accident index for 2021.

A reduction in accident rates and a renewed drive to safeguard the health and safety of our workers led MAPFRE-Peru to award our Toquepala unit with the “Safety Excellence Award” in 2021. This distinction recognizes the effectiveness of the Comprehensive System for Occupational Safety and Health Management that has been implemented at this mine and throughout the organization.

Table of Contents

Thanks to our commitment to adequately use and preserve water resources, we have begun building a wastewater treatment plant in Ilo, Moquegua, Peru. This project will require an investment of $27 million and will benefit more than 77,000 people. SCC will operate and maintain this plant for the next 30 years to prevent wastewater from being discharged into the ocean, which will protect the marine ecosystem and public health. The President of the Council of Ministers, Anibal Torres, inaugurated this facility by, remarking that the “mining sector plays a fundamental role in the country’s growth and that the synergy between the State and the private sector is fueling the construction of emblematic projects.” Prime minister Torres was accompanied by the Minister of Energy and Mines and the Minister of Housing, Construction and Sanitation at this event.

Regarding social impact, in the framework of the 14º International Mining Congress, which was held in Hermosillo, Sonora, Mexico, the Association of Mining Engineers, Metallurgists and Geologists of Mexico (Asociacion de Ingenieros de Minas, Metalurgistas y Geologos de México A.C.) bestowed on Grupo Mexico, the holding company of AMC, with an Award, in recognition of the corporation’s efforts to generate more social impact in this state of Mexico.

More than 300 outstanding students will benefit from the construction of modern infrastructure for the High-Performance School of Moquegua (Colegio de Alto Rendimiento de Moquegua−COAR), which SCC will build through the Taxes for Works mechanism, in conjunction with the Ministry of Education (MINEDU). The project’s first stone was laid at a well-attended ceremony. The facility will be completed over a period of 18 months and will require an investment of $25 million. During the ceremony, the Minister of Education, Rosendo Serna, praised the Company’s contribution to education: “We believe in investing in education and take the struggle against the deep deficit of education infrastructure that seriously affects our country. This task is enormous and lenghty. Therefore, we thank Southern Peru for joining the fight to improve the educational conditions of millions of children and young people throughout the country.”

ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

Our discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, as well as quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risks, are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. We make our best estimate of the ultimate outcome for these items based on historical trends and other information available when the financial statements are prepared. Changes in estimates are recognized in accordance with the accounting rules for the estimate, which is typically in the period when new information becomes available to management. Areas where the nature of the estimate makes it reasonably possible that actual results could materially differ from amounts estimated include: ore reserves, revenue recognition, ore stockpiles on leach pads and related amortization, estimated impairment of assets, asset retirement obligations, determination of discount rates related to the financial lease liabilities, classification of operating leases versus financial leases, valuation allowances for deferred tax assets, unrecognized tax benefits and fair value of financial instruments. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe ~~to be~~ reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following ~~table~~ highlights key financial results for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021 (in millions):

	Three Months Ended September 30,											Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017			2016			Variance			% Change		2017			2016			Variance			% Change

																							Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
																							September 30,									September 30,
Statement of Earnings Data																							2022		2021		Variance		% Change			2022		2021		Variance		% Change
Net sales	$	1,676.5		$	1,400.7		$	275.8		19.7	%	$	4,790.2		$	3,980.8		$	809.4		20.3	%	$	2,156.9	$	2,680.9	$	(524.0)	$	(19.5)	%	$	7,227.6	$	8,110.4	$	(882.8)	$	(10.9)	%
Operating costs and expenses	983.9			(1,038.3		)	(54.4		)	(5.2	)%	(3,001.3		)	(2,887.1		)	(114.2		)	4.0	%		(1,369.7)		(1,173.1)		(196.6)		16.8	%		(4,161.9)		(3,575.8)		(586.1)		16.4	%
Operating income	692.6			362.4			330.2			91.1	%	1,788.9			1,093.7			695.2			63.6	%		787.2		1,507.8		(720.6)		(47.8)	%		3,065.7		4,534.6		(1,468.9)		(32.4)	%
Non-operating income (expense)	(76.0		)	(61.7		)	(14.3		)	23.2	%	(229.8		)	(199.2		)	(30.6		)	15.4	%
Non‑operating income (expense)																								(37.7)		(89.3)		51.6		(57.8)	%		(186.1)		(270.4)		84.3		(31.2)	%
Income before income taxes	616.6			300.7			315.9			105.1	%	1,559.1			894.5			664.6			74.3	%		749.5		1,418.5		(669.0)		(47.2)	%		2,879.6		4,264.2		(1,384.6)		(32.5)	%
Income taxes	(220.1		)	(111.2		)	(108.9		)	97.9	%	(556.6		)	(305.4		)	(251.2		)	82.3	%		(228.5)		(548.6)		320.1		(58.3)	%		(1,137.0)		(1,703.8)		566.8		(33.3)	%
Equity earnings of affiliate	6.3			8.7			(2.4		)	(27.6	)%	16.1			17.4			(1.3		)	(7.5	)%		(0.1)		1.3		(1.4)		(107.7)	%		0.3		14.4		(14.1)		(97.9)	%
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest	(1.0		)	(0.6		)	(0.4		)	66.7	%	(2.6		)	(1.9		)	(0.7		)	36.8	%
Net income attributable to non‑controlling interest																								(1.9)		(3.6)		1.7		(47.2)	%		(6.8)		(10.6)		3.8		(35.8)	%
Net income attributable to SCC	$	402.8		$	197.6		$	204.2		103.3	%	$	1,016.0		$	604.6		$	411.4		68.0	%	$	519.0	$	867.6	$	(348.6)	$	(40.2)	%	$	1,736.1	$	2,564.2	$	(828.1)	$	(32.3)	%

NET SALES

Net sales ~~for the third quarter of 2017 were $1,676.5 million, compared to $1,400.7 million~~ in the third quarter of ~~2016, an increase~~2022 were 19.5% lower than in the same period of ~~$275.8 million.~~2021. This ~~19.7% increase~~decrease was ~~principally~~driven by a drop in average metal prices for copper (-17.4% - LME), molybdenum (-13.2%) and silver (-21.3%) and by a decrease in the ~~result~~sales volumes of ~~higher copper,~~ molybdenum ~~and zinc prices as shown below; partially offset by lower sales volume of copper (-3.4%), silver (-4.8%~~(-24.2%) and zinc ~~(-20.1%~~(-11.4%). This effect was slightly offset by higher prices for zinc (+8.8%); and by an uptick in sales volumes of silver (+8.3%) and copper (+2.4%).

Net sales in the first nine months of ~~2017~~2022 were ~~$4,790.2 million, compared to $3,980.8 million~~10.9% lower than in the ~~first~~ same period of ~~2016, an increase of $809.4 million. This 20.3% increase was principally the result of higher metal prices as shown below, and also~~2021, due to ~~higher~~a decrease in the sales volume of copper ~~(+0.6%~~(-9.2%), molybdenum (-12.5%) and silver ~~(+1.7%~~(-4.8%); ~~partially~~and to a decrease in average metal prices of copper (-1.2%), and silver (-14.9%). These negative variances were slightly offset by ~~lower~~an increase in sales volume of zinc (+2.2%); as well as by higher average metal prices for molybdenum ~~(-1.7%~~(+22.5%) and zinc ~~(-4.2%~~(+26.0%).


		Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2022		2021		% Change		2022		2021		% Change
Copper price ($per pound—LME)	$	3.51	$	4.25	(17.4)	%	$	4.12	$	4.17	(1.2)	%
Copper price ($per pound—COMEX)	$	3.50	$	4.30	(18.6)	%	$	4.12	$	4.20	(1.9)	%
Molybdenum price ($per pound)(1)	$	16.00	$	18.43	(13.2)	%	$	17.76	$	14.50	22.5	%
Zinc price ($per pound—LME)	$	1.48	$	1.36	8.8	%	$	1.65	$	1.31	26.0	%
Silver price ($per ounce—COMEX)	$	19.10	$	24.28	(21.3)	%	$	21.93	$	25.78	(14.9)	%

(1)	Platts Metals Week Dealer Oxide

Table of Contents

~~The table below outlines the average published market metals prices for our metals for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:~~

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2017

2016

% Change

2017

2016

% Change

Copper ($ per pound — LME)

$
2.88

$
2.17

32.7
%
$
2.70

$
2.14

26.2
%
Copper ($ per pound — COMEX)

$
2.89

$
2.16

33.8
%
$
2.71

$
2.13

27.2
%
Molybdenum ($ per pound) (1)

$
8.05

$
6.94

16.0
%
$
7.93

$
6.92

24.5
%
Zinc ($ per pound — LME)

$
1.34

$
1.02

31.4
%
$
1.26

$
0.88

43.2
%
Silver ($ per ounce — COMEX)

$
16.80

$
19.59

(14.2
)%
$
17.15

$
17.10

0.3
%

~~(1)~~ ~~Platt’s Metals Week Dealer Oxide~~

The table below provides our metal sales as a percentage of our total net sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016:~~2021:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016

										Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
									September 30,					September 30,
Sales as a percentage of total net sales										2022		2021		2022		2021
Copper	83.6	%	77.4	%	82.3	%	78.1	%		74.6	%	78.7	%	77.0	%	81.1	%
Molybdenum	5.4	%	5.2	%	5.2	%	5.2	%		9.9	%	11.0	%	9.5	%	9.2	%
Silver	4.2	%	6.2	%	4.6	%	5.5	%		4.1	%	3.9	%	4.0	%	4.5	%
Zinc	3.6	%	4.2	%	4.5	%	4.0	%		4.7	%	3.7	%	3.9	%	2.7	%
Other by-products	3.2	%	7.0	%	3.4	%	7.2	%
Other by‑products										6.7	%	2.7	%	5.6	%	2.5	%
Total	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%		100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%

The table below provides our copper sales by type of product for ~~the~~ three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016 (in million pounds):~~2021. The difference in value between products is the level of processing. At the market price, concentrates take a discount since they require smelting and refining processes, while refined and rod copper receive premiums due to their purity and presentation.

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
Copper Sales	2017	2016	Variance		% Change		2017	2016	Variance		% Change
Refined (including SX-EW)	297.4	303.8	(6.4	)	(2.1	)%	900.5	906.2	(5.7	)	(0.6	)%

													Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
Copper Sales (million pounds)													2022	2021	Variance	% Change		2022	2021	Variance	% Change
Refined (including SX‑EW)													277.3	232.4	44.9	19.3	%	775.3	678.7	96.6	14.2	%
Rod	87.2	84.7	2.5		3.0	%	231.0	243.4	(12.4	)	(5.1	)%	101.3	115.6	(14.3)	(12.4)	%	329.0	361.4	(32.4)	(9.0)	%
Concentrates and other	103.6	116.7	(13.1	)	(11.2	)%	337.3	310.4	26.9		8.7	%	140.0	158.2	(18.2)	(11.5)	%	303.4	510.5	(207.1)	(40.6)	%
Total	488.2	505.2	(17.0	)	(3.4	)%	1,468.8	1,460.0	8.8		0.6	%	518.6	506.2	12.4	2.4	%	1,407.7	1,550.6	(142.9)	(9.2)	%

The table below provides our copper sales volume by type of product as a percentage of our total copper sales volume for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016:~~2021:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,

									Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,
Copper Sales by product type	2017		2016		2017		2016			2022		2021		2022		2021
Refined (including SX-EW)	60.9	%	60.1	%	61.3	%	62.1	%
Refined (including SX‑EW)										53.5	%	45.9	%	55.1	%	43.8	%
Rod	17.9	%	16.8	%	15.7	%	16.7	%		19.5	%	22.8	%	23.4	%	23.3	%
Concentrates and other	21.2	%	23.1	%	23.0	%	21.2	%		27.0	%	31.3	%	21.5	%	32.9	%
Total	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%		100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%

OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES

The table below summarizes the production cost structure by major components as a percentage of total production cost:

	Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016

									Three months ended September 30,				Nine months ended September 30,
									2022		2021		2022		2021
Power	14.6	%	19.0	%	17.1	%	18.3	%	17.1	%	16.6	%	17.3	%	17.5	%
Labor	14.0	%	11.4	%	13.7	%	11.3	%	10.5	%	14.1	%	10.9	%	12.6	%
Fuel	14.7	%	12.7	%	14.0	%	13.4	%	17.2	%	14.6	%	17.0	%	14.4	%
Maintenance	19.4	%	20.4	%	19.0	%	19.5	%	19.9	%	20.0	%	19.3	%	20.7	%
Operating material	19.9	%	18.5	%	19.3	%	19.3	%	20.0	%	17.4	%	19.9	%	17.1	%
Other	17.4	%	18.0	%	16.9	%	18.2	%	15.3	%	17.3	%	15.6	%	17.7	%
Total Production Cost	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%
Total									100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%	100.0	%

Table of Contents

Third quarter: Operating costs and expenses were ~~$983.9~~$1,369.7 million in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2022 compared to ~~$1,038.3~~$1,173.1 million in the ~~third quarter~~same period of ~~2016.~~2021. The ~~decrease~~increase of ~~$54.4~~$196.6 million was primarily due to:

Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2016

$
1,038.3

Less:

·       Lower cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to higher capitalized ore stockpiles on leach pads, lower inventory consumption and lower power costs, partially offset by higher fuel and labor costs.

(49.9
)
·       Lower depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.

(5.2
)
·       Lower exploration expense.

(1.6
)
Plus:

·       Higher selling, general and administrative expenses.

2.3

Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2017

$
983.9


Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter of 2021		$	1,173.1
Plus:
•	Increase in other cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly attributable to an increase in fuel, power and foreign currency effects; this was slightly offset by a decrease in labor costs and workers participation		237.2
Less:
•	Decrease in the volume and cost of metals purchased from third parties.		(26.8)
•	Decrease in depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.		(11.4)
•	Decrease in exploration expense.		(1.3)
•	Decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses.		(1.1)
Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter of 2022		$	1,369.7

Nine months: Operating costs and expenses were ~~$3,001.3~~$4,161.9 million in the first nine months of ~~2017~~2022 compared to ~~$2,887.1~~$3,575.8 million in the same period of ~~2016.~~2021. The increase of ~~$114.2~~$586.1 million was primarily due to:

Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2016

$
2,887.1

Plus:

·       Higher cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to higher inventory consumption, foreign currency transaction effect, higher workers’ participation expense and higher fuel costs, partially offset by lower cost of metals purchased from third parties, and higher capitalized ore stockpiles on leach pads.

120.3

·       Higher depreciation, amortization and depletion mainly as a result of our expansion and maintenance capital investments.

19.5

Less:

·       Partial recovery of the Sonora River remediation costs due to the completion of remediation activities.

(10.2
)
·       Lower selling, general and administrative expenses.

(3.9
)
·       Lower exploration expense.

(11.5
)
Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2017

$
3,001.3


Operating cost and expenses for the nine months of 2021		$	3,575.8
Plus:
•	Increase in other cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly attributable to an increase in fuel, power and foreign currency effects; this was partially offset by a decrease in inventory consumption and workers' participation		496.8
•	Increase in the volume and cost of metals purchased from third parties.		88.7
•	Increase in exploration expense.		3.9
Less:
•	Decrease in depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.		(1.8)
•	Decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses.		(1.5)
Operating cost and expenses for the nine months of 2022		$	4,161.9

NON-OPERATING INCOME ~~(EXPENSE)~~(EXPENSES)

Non-operating income ~~and expense were~~(expense) represented a net expense of ~~$76.0~~$37.7 million and ~~$229.8~~$186.1 million in the three and nine months that ended on September 30, 2022, compared to a net expense of $89.3 million and $270.4 million in the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017, respectively, compared to a net expense of $61.7~~2021.

Third quarter: The $51.6 million ~~and $199.2 million~~decrease in the ~~comparable periods of 2016.~~

~~Third quarter:~~ ~~The higher~~ expense ~~of $14.3 million~~level was ~~primarily~~principally due to:

· ~~$ 15.8~~

●	$40.7 million increase in other income, net, mainly due to $28.5 adjustment of excess in provision of freights and other purchases costs, $3.7 million of lower rain damage and social responsibility expenses and $8.5 million of lower miscellaneous expenses,

●	$6.3 million increase in interest income, partially offset by

●	$0.1 million increase in interest expense, and

●	$4.6 million increase in capitalized interest.

Nine months: The $84.3 million ~~of lower miscellaneous income, net, partially offset by~~

· ~~$ 1.3 million of lower interest~~decrease in the expense ~~and~~

· ~~$ 0.2 million of higher capitalized interest.~~

~~Nine months:~~ ~~The higher expense of $30.6 million~~level was ~~primarily~~principally due to:

· ~~$ 13.1~~

●	$62.2 million increase in other income, net which includes $28.5 million adjustment of excess in provision of freights and other purchases costs, $20.3 million of insurance recovery from Carla Lacey case and $11.3 million of lower rain damage expenses in Peru.

●	$11.5 million increase in interest income, partially offset by

●	$1.7 million increase in interest expense, and

●	$12.3 million increase in capitalized interest.

Table of ~~higher interest expense mainly due~~Contents

INCOME TAXES


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2022			2021
Provision for income taxes ($in millions)	$	1,137.0		$	1,703.8
Effective income tax rate		39.5	%		40.0	%

In addition to ~~an adjustment in capitalized interest computation,~~

· ~~$ 13.3 million of lower miscellaneous income, net; and,~~

· ~~$ 2.0 million of lower interest income.~~

~~INCOME TAXES~~

Nine months ended
September 30,

2017

2016

Provision for income taxes (in millions)

$
556.6

$
305.4

Effective income tax rate

35.7
%
34.1
%

~~These provisions include~~the income taxes ~~for~~of Peru, Mexico and the United ~~States. In addition, a Mexican royalty tax, a portion of~~States, the ~~Peruvian royalty tax~~provision for income taxes also includes the mining royalties from Peru and Mexico and the Peruvian special mining ~~tax are included in the income tax provision. The increase in the~~tax.

effective tax rate for the 2017 period from the same period of 2016 is primarily due to an increase in expected dividends from our Mexican subsidiaries. For further information, please see Note 4 “Income taxes”.

SEGMENT RESULT ANALYSIS

We have three segments: the Peruvian operations, the Mexican open-pit operations and the Mexican underground mining operations.

The table below presents information regarding the volume of our copper sales by segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016:~~2021:

	Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
Copper Sales (million pounds):	2017		2016		Variance		% Change		2017		2016		Variance		% Change

																	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
Copper Sales (million pounds)																	2022	2021	Variance	% Change		2022	2021	Variance	% Change
Peruvian operations	176.5		174.5		2.0		1.1	%	527.9		522.9		5.0		1.0	%	192.0	224.7	(32.7)	(14.5)	%	580.5	655.3	(74.8)	(11.4)	%
Mexican open-pit	311.7		330.7		(19.0	)	(5.7	)%	941.0		937.1		3.9		0.4	%
Mexican open‑pit																	308.4	281.4	27.0	9.6	%	868.3	892.0	(23.7)	(2.7)	%
Mexican IMMSA unit	3.8		5.0		(1.2	)	(24.6	)%	12.3		15.1		(2.8	)	(18.5	)%	5.7	6.2	(0.5)	(7.9)	%	18.3	19.3	(1.0)	(4.9)	%
Other and intersegment elimination	(3.8	)	(5.0	)	1.2		24.6	%	(12.3	)	(15.1	)	2.8		18.5	%	12.5	(6.1)	18.6	(303.1)	%	(59.4)	(16.0)	(43.4)	270.9	%
Total	488.2		505.2		(17.0	)	(3.4	)%	1,468.9		1,460.0		8.9		0.6	%
Total copper sales																	518.6	506.2	12.4	2.4	%	1,407.7	1,550.6	(142.9)	(9.2)	%

The table below presents information regarding the volume of sales by segment of our significant by-products for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016:~~2021:

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

By-product Sales (in million pounds,
except silver — in million ounces)

2017

2016

Variance

%
Change

2017

2016

Variance

%
Change

Peruvian operations

Molybdenum contained in concentrates

4.4

5.7

(1.3
)
(22.5
)%
13.8

17.2

(3.4
)
(19.7
)%
Silver

1.1

0.6

0.5

81.7
%
3.0

2.2

0.8

34.1
%

Mexican open-pit

Molybdenum contained in concentrates

7.5

6.6

0.9

14.1
%
21.9

19.1

2.8

14.5
%
Silver

2.5

2.8

(0.3
)
(10.7
)%
7.8

8.3

(0.5
)
(6.1
)%

Mexican IMMSA unit

Zinc — refined and in concentrate

43.1

54.0

(10.9
)
(20.1
)%
164.3

171.6

(7.3
)
(4.2
)%
Silver

1.0

1.4

(0.4
)
(25.8
)%
3.4

3.5

(0.1
)
(3.4
)%

Other and intersegment elimination

Silver

(0.4
)
(0.4
)
—

—

(1.3
)
(1.4
)
0.1

4.8
%

Total by-product sales

Molybdenum contained in concentrates

11.9

12.3

(0.4
)
(2.8
)%
35.7

36.3

(0.6
)
(1.7
)%
Zinc — refined and in concentrate

43.1

54.0

(10.9
)
(20.1
)%
164.3

171.6

(7.3
)
(4.2
)%
Silver

4.2

4.4

(0.2
)
(4.3
)%
12.9

12.6

0.3

1.7
%

~~Sales value per segment (in millions):~~


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
By‑product Sales (million pounds, except silver—million ounces)	2022	2021	Variance	% Change		2022	2021	Variance	% Change
Peruvian operations:
Molybdenum contained in concentrate	5.3	9.0	(3.7)	(40.9)	%	18.6	23.8	(5.2)	(21.6)	%
Silver	1.1	1.4	(0.3)	(26.3)	%	3.2	3.9	(0.7)	(18.6)	%
Mexican open‑pit operations:
Molybdenum contained in concentrate	8.3	8.9	(0.6)	(7.2)	%	24.4	25.4	(1.0)	(4.0)	%
Silver	2.9	2.2	0.7	33.5	%	8.3	7.4	0.9	11.0	%
IMMSA unit
Zinc‑refined and in concentrate	61.5	69.4	(7.9)	(11.4)	%	159.2	155.8	3.4	2.2	%
Silver	1.6	1.5	0.1	8.0	%	4.8	4.8	—	—	%
Other and intersegment elimination
Silver	(0.8)	(0.7)	(0.1)	15.6	%	(2.7)	(1.8)	(0.9)	44.8	%
Total by‑product sales
Molybdenum contained in concentrate	13.6	17.9	(4.3)	(24.2)	%	43.0	49.2	(6.2)	(12.5)	%
Zinc‑refined and in concentrate	61.5	69.4	(7.9)	(11.4)	%	159.2	155.8	3.4	2.2	%
Silver	4.8	4.4	0.4	8.3	%	13.6	14.3	(0.7)	(4.8)	%

Three Months Ended September 30, 2017

Mexican
Open-Pit

Mexican
IMMSA Unit

Peruvian
Operations

Corporate &
Elimination

Consolidated

Copper

$
898.9

$
9.2

$
502.6

$
(9.2
)
$
1,401.5

Molybdenum

57.3

—

33.9

—

91.2

Zinc

—

59.8

—

0.2

60.0

Silver

42.3

16.5

17.7

(5.8
)
70.7

Other

24.8

18.0

11.5

(1.2
)
53.1

Total

$
1,023.3

$
103.5

$
565.7

$
(16.0
)
$
1,676.5

Three Months Ended September 30, 2016

Mexican
Open-pit

Mexican
IMMSA Unit

Peruvian
Operations

Corporate &
Elimination

Consolidated

Copper

$
700.8

$
8.7

$
384.0

$
(8.7
)
$
1,084.8

Molybdenum

40.4

—

31.8

—

72.2

Zinc

—

58.3

—

—

58.3

Silver

55.9

28.0

11.1

(8.7
)
86.3

Other

67.9

18.9

13.9

(1.6
)
99.1

Total

$
865.0

$
113.9

$
440.8

$
(19.0
)
$
1,400.7

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017

Mexican
Open-Pit

Mexican
IMMSA Unit

Peruvian
Operations

Corporate &
Elimination

Consolidated

Copper

$
2,515.5

$
28.1

$
1,428.0

$
(28.2
)
$
3,943.4

Molybdenum

153.9

—

97.2

—

251.1

Zinc

—

215.5

—

0.2

215.7

Silver

132.7

56.4

51.6

(20.7
)
220.0

Other

73.2

59.1

33.1

(5.4
)
160.0

Total

$
2,875.3

$
359.1

$
1,609.9

$
(54.1
)
$
4,790.2

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016

Mexican
Open-pit

Mexican
IMMSA Unit

Peruvian
Operations

Corporate &
Elimination

Consolidated

Copper

$
1,971.5

$
24.1

$
1,139.2

$
(24.1
)
$
3,110.7

Molybdenum

112.7

—

96.0

—

208.7

Zinc

—

161.1

—

—

161.1

Silver

142.9

60.5

36.7

(23.1
)
217.0

Other

195.4

55.3

38.9

(6.3
)
283.3

Total

$
2,422.5

$
301.0

$
1,310.8

$
(53.5
)
$
3,980.8

~~The geographic breakdown~~Table of ~~the Company’s sales is as follows (in millions):~~Contents

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

The Americas:

Mexico

$
397.0

$
384.5

$
1,128.9

$
1,080.7

United States

329.9

277.8

844.8

778.1

Peru

94.5

71.2

265.2

210.7

Brazil

58.5

50.6

171.8

136.0

Chile

26.5

24.6

77.8

71.9

Other American countries

26.7

17.3

65.8

56.6

Europe:

Switzerland

121.9

39.8

379.6

285.9

Italy

73.9

100.0

240.0

238.9

Other European countries

93.5

88.5

336.1

210.6

Asia:

Singapore

287.5

167.5

807.6

403.2

Japan

134.3

111.7

351.0

340.4

Other Asian countries

32.3

67.2

121.6

167.8

Total

$
1,676.5

$
1,400.7

$
4,790.2

$
3,980.8

Peruvian Operations:


	Three Months Ended September 30,									Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2022		2021		Variance		% Change			2022		2021		Variance		% Change
Net sales	$	815.7	$	1,122.8	$	(307.1)		(27.4)	%	$	2,821.4	$	3,220.9	$	(399.5)		(12.4)	%
Operating costs and expenses		(592.1)		(501.0)		(91.1)		18.2	%		(1,838.7)		(1,488.4)		(350.3)		23.5	%
Operating income	$	223.6	$	621.8	$	(398.2)		(64.0)	%	$	982.7	$	1,732.5	$	(749.8)		(43.3)	%

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

(in millions)

2017

2016

Variance

% Change

2017

2016

Variance

% Change

Net sales

$
565.7

$
440.8

$
124.9

28.3
%
$
1,609.9

$
1,310.8

$
299.2

22.8
%
Operating costs and expenses

(419.5
)
(406.9
)
(12.6
)
3.1
%
(1,192.9
)
(1,158.6
)
(34.3
)
3.0
%
Operating income

$
146.2

$
33.9

$
112.3

331.3
%
$
417.0

$
152.2

$
264.8

174.0
%

~~Third quarter:~~Net sales in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2022 were ~~$565.7~~$815.7 million compared to ~~$440.8~~$1,122.8 million in the third quarter of ~~2016.~~2021. The ~~increase~~decrease in net sales was mainly ~~the result of higher~~driven by a drop in prices for copper ~~and~~(-17.4%), molybdenum ~~prices and higher silver (+81.7%~~(-13.2%) and ~~copper (+1.1%~~silver (-21.3%); and by a decrease in the sales volumes ~~partially offset by lower~~of copper (-14.5%), molybdenum (-40.9%) and silver (-26.3%). The decrease in molybdenum sales ~~volume.~~is mainly explained by a reduction in production due to lower grades.

Operating costs and expenses in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2022 increased by ~~$12.6~~$91.1 million to ~~$419.5 million from $406.9 million in the third quarter of 2016, primarily due to:~~

Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2016

$
406.9

Plus:

·       Higher cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to higher cost of metals purchased from third parties, higher inventory consumption, higher fuel costs and higher workers’ participation expense; partially offset by lower energy and operating contractors costs.

8.8

·       Higher exploration expense.

2.8

· Higher depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.

1.1

Less:

·       Lower selling, general and administrative expense.

(0.1
)
Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2017

$
419.5

~~Nine months:~~ ~~Net sales in the nine months of 2017 were $1,609.9~~$592.1 million compared to $1,310.8 million in the comparable period of 2016. The increase in net sales was mainly the result higher metal prices and higher silver sales volume (+34.1%), partially offset by lower molybdenum sales volume.

~~Operating costs and expenses in the nine months of 2017 increased by $34.3 million to $1,192.9 million from $1,158.6~~$501.0 million in the same period of ~~2016,~~2021. This was primarily due to:

Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2016

$
1,158.6

Plus:

·       Higher cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to higher cost of metals purchased from third parties, higher fuel costs and higher workers’ participation expense; partially offset by lower energy and operating contractors costs, and lower inventory consumption.

51.8

Less:

·       Lower depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.

(14.8
)
·       Lower exploration expenses.

(0.5
)
·       Lower selling, general and administrative expenses.

(2.2
)
Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2017

$
1,192.9


Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter of 2021		$	501.0
Plus:
•	Increase in other cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion), which was mainly attributable to increases in fuel costs, inventory consumption, operating contractors and foreign currency effects; this was partially offset by a decrease in labor costs and lower workers' participation.		138.4
•	Increase in exploration expenses.		0.6
Less:
•	Decrease in the volume and cost of metals purchased from third parties.		(33.9)
•	Decrease in depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.		(13.4)
•	Decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses.		(0.6)
Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter of 2022		$	592.1

~~Mexican Open-pit Operations~~:

Three Months Ended September 30,

Nine Months Ended September 30,

(in millions)

2017

2016

Variance

% Change

2017

2016

Variance

% Change

Net sales

$
1,023.3

$
865.0

$
158.3

18.3
%
$
2,875.3

$
2,422.5

$
452.8

18.7
%
Operating costs and expenses

(486.7
)
(570.9
)
84.2

(14.7
)%
(1,553.8
)
(1,598.8
)
45.0

(2.8
)%
Operating income

$
536.6

$
294.1

$
242.5

82.5
%
$
1,321.5

$
823.7

$
497.8

60.4
%

~~Third quarter:~~Net sales in the ~~third quarter~~first nine months of ~~2017~~2022 were ~~$1,023.3~~$2,821.4 million compared to $865.0 million in the third quarter of 2016. The increase of $158.3 million was principally due to higher copper and molybdenum prices and higher molybdenum sales volume (+14.1%), partially offset by lower silver and copper sales volumes.

~~Operating costs and expenses in the third quarter of 2017 decreased by $84.2 million to $486.7 million from $570.9 million in the same 2016 period, primarily due to:~~

Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2016

$
570.9

Less:

·       Lower cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to lower cost of metals purchased from third parties and higher capitalized ore stockpiles on leach pads; partially offset by higher fuel costs and higher workers participation expense.

(89.0
)
·       Lower exploration expense.

(1.8
)
Plus:

·       Higher selling, general and administrative expenses.

4.0

·       Higher depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.

2.6

Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2017

$
486.7

~~Nine months:~~ ~~Net sales in the nine months of 2017 were $2,875.3 million, compared to $2,422.5~~$3,220.9 million in the same period of ~~2016.~~2021. The decrease in net sales was mainly driven by lower sales volumes of copper (-11.4%), silver (-18.6%) and molybdenum (-21.6%) and by a decrease in the average metal prices of copper (-1.2%) and silver (-14.9%). This effect was slightly offset by an increase in average metal prices of ~~$452.8~~molybdenum (+22.5%) prices.

Operating costs and expenses in the first nine months of 2022 increased by $350.3 million to $1,838.7 million compared to $1,488.4 million in the same period of 2021. This was primarily due to:


Operating cost and expenses for the nine months of 2021		$	1,488.4
Plus:
•	Increase in the volume and cost of metals purchased from third parties.		197.0
•	Increase in other cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion), which was mainly attributable to increases in fuel costs and foreign currency effects; this was partially offset by a decrease in labor costs, lower workers' participation and an increase in capitalized leacheable material.		154.9
•	Increase in exploration expenses.		4.2
Less:
•	Decrease in depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.		(4.8)
•	Decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses.		(1.0)
Operating cost and expenses for the nine months of 2022		$	1,838.7

Table of Contents

Mexican Open-pit Operations:


	Three Months Ended September 30,									Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2022		2021		Variance		% Change			2022		2021		Variance		% Change
Net sales	$	1,201.5	$	1,425.8	$	(224.3)		(15.7)	%	$	4,184.7	$	4,536.6	$	(351.9)		(7.8)	%
Operating costs and expenses		(818.6)		(549.2)		(269.4)		49.1	%		(2,255.7)		(1,782.1)		(473.6)		26.6	%
Operating income	$	382.9	$	876.6	$	(493.7)		(56.3)	%	$	1,929.0	$	2,754.5	$	(825.5)		(30.0)	%

Net sales in the third quarter of 2022 were $1,201.5 million, compared to $1,425.8 million in the same period of 2021. The decrease of $224.3 million was principally due to ~~higher~~a decrease in sales volumes of molybdenum (-7.2%) and to lower average metal prices for copper (-17.4%), molybdenum (-13.2%) and ~~higher copper and molybdenum sales volumes, slightly~~silver (-21.3%). This effect was partially offset by ~~lower~~higher sales volume of copper (+9.6%) and silver ~~sales volume.~~(+33.5%).

Operating costs and expenses in the third quarter of 2022 increased by $269.4 million to $818.6 million versus $549.2 million in the same period of 2021, primarily due to:


Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter of 2021		$	549.2
Plus:
•	Increase in cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly attributable to a increase in power, workers' participation and operating contractors costsn; as well as increase in inventory consumption.		276.2
•	Increase in selling, general and administrative expenses.		1.2
Less:
•	Decrease in the cost of metals purchased from third parties.		(6.8)
•	Decrease in depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.		(1.2)
Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter of 2022		$	818.6

Net sales in the first nine months of ~~2017 decreased by $45.0~~2022 were $4,184.7 million, compared to ~~$1,553.8 million from $1,598.8~~$4,536.6 million in the ~~comparable 2016~~same period of 2021. The decrease of $351.9 million was principally due to lower sales volumes of copper (-2.7%) and molybdenum (-4.0%) and to a decrease in copper (-1.2%) and silver (-14.9%) prices. This effect was offset by an increase in sales volumes of silver (+11.0%) and by higher molybdenum (+22.5%) prices.

Operating costs and expenses in the first nine months of 2022 increased by $473.6 million to $2,255.7 million versus $1,782.1 million in the same 2021 period, primarily due to:

Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2016

$
1,598.8

Less:

·       Lower cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to lower cost of metals purchased from third parties, higher capitalized ore stockpiles on leach pads and lower sales expenses; partially offset by foreign currency transaction effect and inventory consumption.

(58.8
)
·       Partial recovery of the Sonora River remediation costs due to the completion of remediation activities.

(10.2
)
·       Lower selling, general and administrative expenses.

(1.1
)
·       Lower exploration expenses.

(3.6
)
Plus:

·       Higher depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.

28.7

Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2017

$
1,553.8


Operating cost and expenses for the nine months of 2021		$	1,782.1
Plus:
•	Increase in other cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion), which was mainly attributable to increases in fuel, power, workers' participation and operating contractors costs; this was partially offset by a decrease in inventory consumption.		460.6
•	Increase in the cost of metals purchased from third parties.		13.1
•	Increase in depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.		0.3
Less:
•	Decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses.		(0.2)
•	Decrease in exploration expenses.		(0.1)
Operating cost and expenses for the nine months of 2022		$	2,255.8

Table of Contents

Mexican Underground Operations (IMMSA):

	Three Months Ended September 30,											Nine Months Ended September 30,
($ in millions)	2017			2016			Variance			% Change		2017			2016			Variance			% Change

																							Three Months Ended September 30,									Nine Months Ended September 30,
																							2022		2021		Variance		% Change			2022		2021		Variance		% Change
Net sales	$	103.5		$	113.9		$	(10.4	)	(9.1	)%	$	359.1		$	301.0		$	58.1		19.3	%	$	159.2	$	175.1	$	(15.9)		(9.1)	%	$	503.0	$	460.8	$	42.2		9.2	%
Operating costs and expenses	(90.3		)	(93.4		)	3.1			(3.3	)%	(296.4		)	(265.5		)	(30.9		)	11.6	%		(160.6)		(153.1)		(7.5)		4.9	%		(438.4)		(379.8)		(58.6)		15.4	%
Operating income	$	13.2		$	20.5		$	(7.3	)	(35.6	)%	$	62.7		$	35.5		$	27.2		76.6	%	$	(1.4)	$	22.0	$	(23.4)		(106.4)	%	$	64.6	$	81.0	$	(16.4)		(20.2)	%

~~Third quarter:~~Net sales in the third quarter of ~~2017~~2022 were ~~$103.5~~$159.2 million, compared to ~~$113.9~~$175.1 million in the same period of 2021. This decrease of $15.9 million was primarily due to the decrease in sales volumes of zinc (-11.4%) and copper (-7.9%); and by lower average metal prices for copper (-17.4%) and silver (-21.3%). This effect was slightly offset by an increase in sales volumes of silver (+8.0%) and higher zinc (+8.8%) prices.

Operating costs and expenses in the third quarter of ~~2016.~~2022 increased by $7.5 million and reached $160.6 million versus $153.1 million in the same period of 2021. This ~~decrease~~was primarily due to:


Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter of 2021		$	153.1
Plus:
•	Increase in other cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to an increase in inventory consumption and operating contractors' costs; this was slightly offset by lower workers' participation and power costs.		13.7
•	Increase in depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.		2.4
Less:
•	Decrease in cost of metals purchased from third parties.		(8.4)
•	Decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses.		(0.2)
Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter of 2022		$	160.6

Net sales in the first nine months of ~~$10.4~~2022 were $503.0 million, compared to $460.8 million in the same period of 2021. This increase of $42.2 million was primarily due to ~~lower~~an increase in sales volumes of zinc ~~(-20.1%~~(+2.2%) and silver ~~(-25.8%~~(+1.6%) ~~sales volumes,~~; and to higher prices for zinc (+26.0%). This effect was partially offset by a ~~higher zinc price.~~decrease in the prices of copper (-1.2%) and silver (-12.0%) and a drop in sales volume of copper (-4.9%).

Operating costs and expenses in the ~~third quarter~~first nine months of ~~2017 decreased~~2022 increased by ~~$3.1~~$58.6 million to ~~$90.3~~situate at $438.4 million ~~from $93.4~~versus $379.8 million in the ~~third quarter~~same period of ~~2016,~~2021. This was primarily due to:

Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2016

$
93.4

Less:

·       Lower depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.

(2.7
)
·       Lower selling, general and administrative expenses.

(0.6
)
Plus:

·       Higher exploration expense.

0.2

Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2017

$
90.3


Operating cost and expenses for the nine months of 2021		$	379.8
Plus:
•	Increase in cost of metals purchased from third parties.		52.9
•	Increase in other cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to an increase in contractors' costs; this was mostly offset by lower power and workers' participation costs.		4.4
•	Increase in depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.		1.4
•	Increase in exploration expenses.		0.2
Less:
•	Decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses.		(0.3)
Operating cost and expenses for the nine months of 2022		$	438.4

~~Nine months:~~ Net sales in the nine months of 2017 were $359.1 million, compared to $301.0 million in the comparable period of 2016. This increase of $58.1 million was primarily due to higher metal prices, partially offset by lower silver and zinc sales volume.

~~Operating costs and expenses in the nine months of 2017 increased by $30.9 million to $296.4 million from $265.5 million in the comparable period of 2016, primarily due to:~~

Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2016

$
265.5

Plus:

·       Higher cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to higher cost of metals purchased from third parties and higher power costs; partially offset by inventory consumption and foreign currency effect.

32.4

·       Higher selling, general and administrative expenses.

0.3

Less:

·       Lower exploration expenses.

(1.2
)
·       Lower depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.

(0.6
)
Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2017

$
296.4

Intersegment Eliminations and Adjustments:

The net sales, operating costs and expenses and operating income discussed above will not be directly equal to amounts in our condensed consolidated statement of earnings because the adjustments of intersegment operating revenues and expenses must be taken into account. Please see Note 1014 “Segment and Related Information” of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash flow:

The following table shows the cash flow for the first nine months of ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021 (in millions):

	2017			2016			Variance

										2022		2021		Variance
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	1,280.0		$	635.9		$	644.1		$	1,720.6	$	3,064.7	$	(1,344.1)
Net cash used in investing activities	$	(688.6	)	$	(224.0	)	$	(464.6	)	$	(171.0)	$	(912.1)	$	741.1
Net cash used in financing activities	$	(262.7	)	$	(172.0	)	$	(90.7	)	$	(2,323.3)	$	(1,705.1)	$	(618.2)

Net cash provided by operating activities:

The change in net cash from operating activities for the first nine months of ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016~~2021 include (in millions):

	2017			2016			Variance			% Change

												2022		2021		Variance		% Change
Net income	$	1,018.6		$	606.5		412.1			67.9	%	$	1,742.9	$	2,574.8	$	(831.9)		(32.3)	%
Depreciation, amortization and depletion	493.8			474.3			19.5			4.1	%		597.6		599.4		(1.8)		(0.3)	%
Benefit for deferred income taxes	(61.7		)	(130.9		)	69.2			52.9	%
Loss (income) on foreign currency transaction effect	50.8			(6.5		)	57.3			881.5	%
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes													84.5		(100.1)		184.6		(184.4)	%
Loss (gain) on foreign currency transaction effect													52.0		(50.0)		102.0		(204.0)	%
Other adjustments to net income	2.9			13.9			(11.0		)	(79.1	)%		25.2		10.6		14.6		137.7	%
Change in operating assets and liabilities	(224.4		)	(321.4		)	97.0			30.2	%
Operating assets and liabilities													(781.6)		30.0		(811.6)		(2,705.3)	%
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	1,280.0		$	635.9		$	644.1		101.3	%	$	1,720.6	$	3,064.7	$	(1,344.1)		(43.9)	%

Significant items added to (deducted from) net income to arrive at operating cash flow include depreciation, amortization and depletion, deferred tax amounts, foreign currency fluctuations and changes in operating assets and liabilities.

Nine months ended September 30, ~~2017:~~2022: Net income was ~~$1,018.6~~$1,742.9 million, which represented approximately ~~79.6%~~101.3% of the net operating cash flow. AOperating cash flow decreased by $781.6 million due to the following variances in operating assets and liabilities:

●	$292.9 million decrease in trade accounts receivable, primarily driven by higher collections at our Peruvian and Mexican operations.

●	$(768.6) million decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, which was mainly driven by a decrease in accrued income taxes at our Mexican and Peruvian operations.

●	$(248.0) million increase in other operating assets and liabilities, net, principally due to an increase in other accounts receivables at our Mexican operations mainly to workers.

●	$(57.9) million net increase in inventory; this was primarily driven by a $36.0 million increase in the work in process inventory, principally at our Mexican operations.

Nine months ended September 30, 2021: Net income was $2,574.8 million, which represented approximately 84.0% of the net operating cash flow.

Changes in operating assets and liabilities ~~decreased operating~~increased cash flow by ~~$224.4~~$30.0 million ~~and included:~~

· ~~$(238.3) million increase in accounts receivable.~~

· $(120.5) million of net increase in inventory, which included $(133.6) million of higher non-current leaching inventory, $(22.4) million of higher supplies inventories for our operations and $(48.4) million of higher metals in process, partially offset by $83.9 million of lower finished goods inventory.

· $(9.5) million decrease in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, which included $(66.8) million of lower accrued income taxes, partially offset by higher accrued interest of $47.5 million and $9.8 million of higher other liabilities.

· ~~$143.9 million decrease in other operating assets and liabilities, which included principally $126.8 million of lower prepaid taxes, mainly~~ due to the ~~use~~following variances:

●	$(424.5) million increase in trade accounts receivable, which was mainly attributable to the increase in metal prices in 2021.

●	$(8.3) million net increase in inventory; this was primarily driven by a $29.2 million increase in the work in process inventory, which was in turn partially offset by a $21.4 million drop in the work in process inventory.

●	$409.5 million increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, which was mainly due to the increase in accrued income taxes and workers’ participation at our Mexican and Peruvian operations.

●	$53.3 million decrease in other operating assets and liabilities.

Table of ~~tax credits from previous years.~~Contents

Net cash used in investing activities:

Nine months ended September 30, ~~2016: Net income was $606.5 million or 95.4% of the net operating cash flow. A net variance in operating assets and liabilities reduced operating cash flow by $321.4 million and included:~~

· ~~$(115.0) million increase in accounts receivable.~~

· ~~$(149.7) million increase in inventory, which included $(34.3) million of higher non-current leaching inventory and $(115.4) million of higher inventories and supplies for our operations.~~

· $53.6 million increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, which included $(0.5) million of lower accounts payable, $81.8 million higher income tax provision and $(27.7) million of workers’ participation payments.

· $(110.3) million increase in other operating assets and liabilities, which mainly includes $(83.5) million of higher prepaid taxes, $(19.7) million of higher current payments in advance and $(7.1) million of other operating assets and liabilities.

2022:Net cash used ~~for investing activities:~~

~~Nine months ended September 30,~~ ~~2017:~~ ~~Net cash used for~~in investing activities included ~~$710.4~~$657.6 million for capital investments. The capital investments included:

●	$403.9 million of investments at our Mexican operations:

●

$70.8 million for the Buenavista-Zinc project,

●

$22.8 million for the Pilares project,

●

$20.4 million for the MexArco unit,

●

$121.0 million at our IMMSA unit,

●

$18.0 million for the Jales Deposits of new concentrator

●

$158.3 million for various replacement and maintenance capital expenditures, and

●

$7.4 million increase in capital expenditures incurred but not yet paid.

●	$248.6 million of investments at our Peruvian operations:

●

$21.9 million for the Quebrada Honda dam expansion,

●

$4.8 million for the relocation of facilities at Toquepala,

●

$5.6 million for projects at the Ilo facilities,

●

$199.3 million for various other replacement and maintenance capital expenditures, and

●

$17.0 million decrease in capital expenditures incurred but not yet paid.

· ~~$248.8 million of investments at our Mexican operations:~~

· ~~$26.2 million for~~Investment activities in the ~~new Buenavista concentrator,~~

· ~~$39.0 million for the new tailing disposal deposit at the Buenavista mine,~~

· ~~$20.1 million for the Quebalix IV project,~~

· ~~$10.3 million for the solutions system improvements of Tinajas,~~

· ~~$8.9 million for the tailings discharge line and reclaimed water system at the Bueanvista mine,~~

· ~~$23.3 million at our IMMSA unit, and~~

· ~~$121.0 million for various other replacement expenditures.~~

· ~~$461.6 million of investments at our Peruvian operations:~~

· ~~$193.1 million for the Toquepala concentrator expansion project,~~

· ~~$44.1 million for the Heavy Mineral Management Optimizing Project in Cuajone,~~

· ~~$10.0 million for the Tailing Thickener replacement project in Cuajone,~~

· ~~$23.9 million for the Toquepala mine equipment acquisition,~~

· ~~$28.5 million for the Ilo 3 substation, and~~

· ~~$162.0 million for various other replacement expenditures.~~

~~The~~first nine months of ~~2017 investment activities include $9.6~~2022 included $486.7 million of net ~~proceeds from~~proceed of short-term investments.

Nine months ended September 30, ~~2016~~:2021: Net cash used in investing activities included ~~$840.5~~$695.5 million for capital investments. The capital investments ~~that~~ included:

· ~~$386.2~~

●	$457.9 million of investments at our Mexican operations:

●

$113.4 million for the Buenavista-Zinc project,

●

$58.2 million for the new tailing disposal deposit at the Buenavista mine,

●

$22.8 million for the Pilares project,

●

$15.9 million for land acquisitions for new projects,

●

$13.0 million for the expansion of the mine pit at Buenavista,

●

$66.2 million at our IMMSA unit,

●

$156.3 million for various replacement and maintenance capital expenditures, and

●

$12.1 million decrease in capital expenditures incurred but not yet paid.

●	$237.6 million of investments at our Peruvian operations:

●

$59.7 million for the Quebrada Honda dam expansion,

●

$18.4 million for the Toquepala concentrator expansion project,

●

$17.9 million for the relocation of facilities at Toquepala,

●

$8.2 million for projects at the Ilo facilities,

●

$126.2 million for various other replacement and maintenance capital expenditures, and

●

$7.2 million decrease in capital expenditures incurred but not yet paid.

· ~~$60.1 million for~~Investment activities in the ~~new Buenavista concentrator~~

· ~~$29.3 million for new projects infrastructure,~~

· ~~$43.6 million for the new tailing disposal deposit at the Buenavista mine,~~

· ~~$75.6 million for the Quebalix IV project,~~

· ~~$29.7 million for the solutions system improvements of Tinajas,~~

· ~~$26.2 million at our IMMSA unit, and~~

· ~~$121.7 million for various other replacement expenditures.~~

· ~~$454.3 million of investments at our Peruvian operations:~~

· ~~$90.2 million for the Toquepala mine equipment acquisition,~~

· ~~$84.6 million for the Toquepala concentrator expansion project,~~

· ~~$32.9 million for the Heavy Mineral Management Optimizing Project in Cuajone,~~

· ~~$12.6 million for the High Pressure Grinding Roll (HPGR) system in Toquepala, and~~

· ~~$234.0 million for various other replacement expenditures.~~

~~The~~first nine months ~~ended September 30, 2016 investment activities~~of 2021 include ~~$502.7~~$216.0 million of net ~~proceeds from sale~~purchases of short-term investments, and ~~a repayment~~$12.5 million for the second payment for the acquisition of ~~$111.2 million received from a related party.~~

~~Net cash used for financing activities:~~the Michiquillay project.

Net cash used for financing activities in the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $262.7 million, compared to $172.0 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The nine months of 2017 included a dividend distribution of $262.8 million, compared to a distribution of $100.6 million in the same period of 2016. There were no repurchases of our common shares in the nine months of 2017, while in the same period of 2016 we repurchased 2.9 million of our common shares at a cost of $71.7 million.

Dividends:

On ~~August 23, 2017, we paid a dividend of $0.14 per share totaling $108.2 million. On~~ October ~~19, 2017, our~~20, 2022, the Board of Directors authorized a ~~quarterly~~ dividend of ~~$0.25~~$0.50 per share ~~expected to total $193.3 million, to be paid~~payable on November ~~22, 2017~~23, 2022 to ~~SCC~~ shareholders of record at the close of business on November ~~8, 2017.~~9, 2022.

Table of Contents

Capital Investment and Exploration Programs:

A discussion of our capital investment programs is an important part of understanding our liquidity and capital resources. We expect to meet the cash requirements for these capital investments from cash on hand, internally generated funds and from additional external financing if required. For information regarding our capital investment programs, please see the discussion under the caption “Capital Investment Programs” under this Item 2.

Contractual Obligations:

There have been no material changes in our contractual obligations in the ~~nine months~~third quarter of ~~2017.~~2022. Please see item 7 in Part II of our ~~2016~~2021 annual report on Form 10-K.

NON-GAAP INFORMATION RECONCILIATION

Operating cash cost: Following is a reconciliation of “Operating Cash Cost” (see page ~~34)~~43) to cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) as reported in our consolidated statement of earnings, in millions of dollars and dollars per pound of copper in the table ~~below.~~below:

Three Months Ended

Three Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

Nine Months Ended

September 30, 2017

September 30, 2016

September 30, 2017

September 30, 2016

$ million

$ per pound

$ million

$ per pound

$ million

$ per pound

$ million

$ per pound

Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)

$
781.5

$
1.65

$
831.4

$
1.74

$
2,430.2

$
1.75

$
2,309.9

$
1.60

Add:

Selling, general and administrative

25.0

0.05

22.7

0.05

68.6

0.05

72.5

0.05

Sales premiums, net of treatment and refining charges

2.4

0.01

6.9

0.01

18.9

0.01

15.7

0.01

Less:

Workers’ participation

(42.7
)
(0.09
)
(34.1
)
(0.07
)
(128.7
)
(0.09
)
(91.9
)
(0.06
)
Cost of metal purchased from third parties

(103.1
)
(0.22
)
(105.4
)
(0.22
)
(238.8
)
(0.17
)
(277.5
)
(0.19
)
Other cost of sales, net

(34.2
)
(0.07
)
(37.8
)
(0.08
)
(123.0
)
(0.09
)
(57.9
)
(0.04
)
Inventory change

55.6

0.12

8.5

0.02

50.0

0.03

93.7

0.06

Operating cash cost before by-products revenues

$
684.5

$
1.45

$
692.2

$
1.45

$
2,077.2

$
1.49

$
2,064.5

$
1.43

Add:

By-product revenues (1)

(243.5
)
(0.51
)
(249.3
)
(0.52
)
(750.7
)
(0.54
)
(668.0
)
(0.46
)
Net revenue on sale of metal purchased from third parties

(13.8
)
(0.04
)
(3.9
)
(0.01
)
(36.7
)
(0.02
)
(37.8
)
(0.03
)
Total by-product revenues

(257.3
)
(0.55
)
(253.2
)
(0.53
)
(787.4
)
(0.56
)
(705.8
)
(0.49
)

Operating cash cost, net of by-product revenues

$
427.2

0.90

$
439.0

0.92

$
1,289.8

0.93

$
1,358.7

0.94

Total pounds of copper produced (in millions)

473.8

476.8

1,393.0

1,440.8


	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2022				September 30, 2021				September 30, 2022				September 30, 2021
			$ per				$ per				$ per				$ per
	$ millions		pound		$ millions		pound		$ millions		pound		$ millions		pound
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)	$	1,137.9	$	2.33	$	927.5	$	1.77	$	3,442.3	$	2.48	$	2,856.8	$	1.85
Add:
Selling, general and administrative		30.2		0.06		31.3		0.06		91.4		0.06		92.9		0.06
Sales premiums, net of treatment and refining charges		(5.7)		(0.01)		(10.3)		(0.02)		(28.0)		(0.02)		(25.9)		(0.02)
Less:
Workers’ participation		(31.8)		(0.07)		(40.5)		(0.08)		(208.2)		(0.15)		(250.2)		(0.16)
Cost of metals purchased from third parties		(35.9)		(0.07)		(62.7)		(0.12)		(261.2)		(0.19)		(172.5)		(0.11)
Royalty charge and other, net		(43.9)		(0.09)		(5.9)		(0.01)		(269.3)		(0.19)		(65.8)		(0.04)
Inventory change		(45.2)		(0.09)		7.7		0.02		27.5		0.02		1.1		—
Operating Cash Cost before by‑product revenues	$	1,005.6	$	2.06	$	847.1	$	1.62	$	2,794.5	$	2.01	$	2,436.4	$	1.58
Add:
By‑product revenues(1)		(489.1)		(1.01)		(537.3)		(1.03)		(1,530.6)		(1.10)		(1,442.3)		(0.93)
Net revenue on sale of metal purchased from third parties		(12.0)		(0.02)		(6.1)		(0.01)		(19.3)		(0.01)		(15.9)		(0.01)
Add:
Total by‑product revenues		(501.1)		(1.03)		(543.4)		(1.04)		(1,549.9)		(1.11)		(1,458.2)		(0.94)
Operating Cash Cost net of by‑product revenues	$	504.5	$	1.03	$	303.7	$	0.58	$	1,244.6	$	0.90	$	978.2	$	0.64
Total pounds of copper produced (in millions)		487.8				522.5				1,388.5				1,541.0

~~(1)~~

(1)	By-product revenues included in our presentation of operating cash cost contain the following:

Table of ~~operating cash cost contain the following:~~Contents


	Three Months Ended				Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30, 2022				September 30, 2021				September 30, 2022				September 30, 2021
			$ per				$ per				$ per				$ per
	$ millions		pound		$ millions		pound		$ millions		pound		$ millions		pound
Molybdenum	$	(212.6)	$	(0.44)	$	(294.5)	$	(0.56)	$	(686.6)	$	(0.50)	$	(746.3)	$	(0.48)
Silver		(71.0)		(0.15)		(99.7)		(0.19)		(265.4)		(0.19)		(343.1)		(0.22)
Zinc		(65.8)		(0.14)		(71.1)		(0.14)		(187.6)		(0.14)		(149.6)		(0.10)
Sulfuric Acid		(108.5)		(0.22)		(46.8)		(0.09)		(300.8)		(0.22)		(117.0)		(0.08)
Gold and others		(31.2)		(0.06)		(25.2)		(0.05)		(90.2)		(0.05)		(86.3)		(0.05)
Total	$	(489.1)	$	(1.01)	$	(537.3)	$	(1.03)	$	(1,530.6)	$	(1.10)	$	(1,442.3)	$	(0.93)

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk

Commodity price risk:

For additional information on metal price sensitivity, refer to “Metal Prices” in Part I, Item 2 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2022.

Foreign currency exchange rate risk:

Our functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Portions of our operating costs are denominated in Peruvian soles and Mexican pesos. Since our revenues are primarily denominated in U.S. dollars, when inflation or deflation in our Mexican or Peruvian operations is not offset by a change in the exchange rate of the sol or the peso to the dollar, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be affected by local cost conversion when expressed in U.S. dollars. In addition, the dollar value of our net monetary assets denominated in soles or pesos can be affected by exchange rate variances of the sol or the peso, resulting in a re-measurement gain or loss in our financial statements. Recent inflation and exchange rate variances are provided in the table below for the three and ~~nine month periods~~six months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016:~~2021:

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016

									Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
									September 30,				September 30,
									2022		2021		2022		2021
Peru:
Peruvian inflation rate	0.9	%	0.7	%	2.0	%	2.2	%	2.1	%	2.4	%	6.7	%	4.6	%


Initial exchange rate	3.255		3.292		3.360		3.413		3.830		3.866		3.998		3.624
Closing exchange rate	3.267		3.403		3.267		3.403		3.984		4.136		3.984		4.136
Appreciation/(devaluation)	(0.4	)%	(3.4	)%	2.8	%	0.3	%	(4.0)	%	(7.0)	%	0.4	%	(14.1)	%


Mexico:
Mexican inflation rate	1.2	%	1.2	%	4.4	%	1.5	%	2.1	%	1.4	%	6.2	%	4.9	%


Initial exchange rate	17.897		18.911		20.664		17.207		19.985		19.803		20.584		19.949
Closing exchange rate	18.198		19.500		18.198		19.500		20.306		20.306		20.306		20.306
Appreciation/(devaluation)	(1.7	)%	(3.1	)%	11.9	%	(13.3	)%	(1.6)	%	(2.5)	%	1.4	%	(1.8)	%

Change in monetary position:

Assuming an exchange rate variance of 10% at September 30, ~~2017~~2022, we estimate our net monetary position in Peruvian sol and Mexican peso would increase (decrease) our net earnings as follows:


	Effect in net
	earnings
	($ in millions)
Appreciation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. Peruvian sol	$	7.5
Devaluation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. Peruvian sol	$	(9.1)
Appreciation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. Mexican peso	$	(42.3)
Devaluation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. Mexican peso	$	51.7

Effect on net
earnings

($ in millions)

Appreciation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. sol

$
4.1

Devaluation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. sol

$
(5.0
)
Appreciation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. Mexican peso

$
13.5

Devaluation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. Mexican peso

$
(16.5
)

Open sales risk:

Our provisional copper and molybdenum sales contain an embedded derivative that is required to be separate from the host contract for accounting purposes. The host contract is the receivable from the sale of copper and molybdenum concentrates at prevailing market prices at the time of the sale. The embedded derivative, which does not qualify for hedge accounting, is marked to market through earnings each period prior to settlement. See Note 513 to our condensed consolidated financial statements for further information about these provisional sales.

Table of Contents

Short-term Investments:

For additional information on our trading securities and available-for-sale investments, refer to “Short-term Investments” in Part I, Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, ~~2017.~~2022.

Derivative Instruments:

From time to time, we use derivative instruments to manage our cash flows exposure to changes in commodity prices. We do not enter into derivative contracts unless we anticipate that the possibility exists that future activity will expose our future cash flows to deterioration. Derivative contracts for commodities are entered into to manage the price risk associated with forecasted purchases of the commodities that we use in our manufacturing process.

Cash Flow Hedges of Natural Gas

Our objective in using natural gas derivatives is to protect the stability of natural gas costs and manage exposure to natural gas price increases. To protect natural gas costs from estimated price increases in the past winter season, we acquired two derivative instruments that began in November 2021 and ended in March 2022.

We assessed these derivative instruments as Cash Flow Hedges. As such, the effective portions of said hedges are initially reported in Other Comprehensive Income (OCI) and were reclassified as earnings in the same line item associated with the forecasted transaction and in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affected earnings. The Company did not identify any ineffective portions of these derivatives.

As of September 30, 2022 and 2021, we did held no derivative instruments.

Cautionary Statement:

~~Cautionary Statement~~:

Forward-looking statements in this report and in other Company statements include statements regarding expected commencement dates of mining or metal production operations, projected quantities of future metal production, anticipated production rates, operating efficiencies, costs and expenditures as well as projected demand or supply for the Company’s products. Actual results could differ materially depending upon factors including the risks and uncertainties relating to general U.S. and international economic and political conditions, the cyclical and volatile prices of copper, other commodities and supplies, including fuel and electricity, availability of materials, insurance coverage, equipment, required permits or approvals and financing, the occurrence of unusual weather or operating conditions, lower than expected ore grades, water and geological problems, the failure of equipment or processes to operate in accordance with specifications, failure to obtain financial assurance to meet closure and remediation obligations, labor relations, litigation and environmental risks as well as political and economic risk associated with foreign operations. Results of operations are directly affected by metal prices on commodity exchanges that can be volatile.

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

As of September 30, ~~2017,~~2022, the Company conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s disclosure committee and the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness and the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of September 30, ~~2017,~~2022, to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is:

Recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and

1. ~~Recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and~~

Accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

2. ~~Accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.~~

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that occurred during the ~~quarter~~three months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of Southern Copper Corporation:

Results of Review of Interim Financial Statements

We have reviewed the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet of Southern Copper Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, ~~2017, and~~2022, the related condensed consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income and cash flows for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022, and ~~2016. These~~2021, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “interim financial information”). Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial ~~statements are~~information for it to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the ~~responsibility~~United States of ~~the Company’s management.~~America.

We ~~conducted our review~~have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2021, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 7, 2022, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2021 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

Basis for Review Results

This interim financial information is the responsibility of the Company’s management. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our reviews in accordance with standards of the PCAOB. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the ~~Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),~~PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the ~~condensed~~ consolidated ~~interim~~ financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of Southern Copper Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of earnings, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein); and in our report dated March 1, 2017, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruiz Urquiza, S.C.

Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited


/s/ ~~Miguel Angel Andrade Leven~~Paulina Ramos Ramirez
~~Miguel Angel Andrade Leven~~C.P.C. Paulina Ramos Ramirez
Mexico City, Mexico
~~November 3, 2017~~October 31, 2022

Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings:

The information provided in Note 910 “Commitments and Contingencies” to the condensed consolidated financial statements contained in Part I of this Form 10-Q, is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A. Risk Factors:

~~There have been no material changes~~The Company's operations and financial results are subject to ~~our risk factors during the three months ended September 30, 2017. For additional information on risk factors, refer to~~various risks and uncertainties, including those described in “Risk Factors” included in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2021 filed with the SEC on March ~~1, 2017.~~7, 2022. The following supplements and updates the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Potential delays in transportation of products to customers and possible shortages of critical parts, equipment, and other resources may adversely affect our results of operations.

Current challenges in the global shipping industry have led to congestion in ports, a shortage in containers, and a lack of space on ships. Because of this situation, the Company faces a risk of potential supply chain disruptions that may adversely affect our operations and development projects. To address this potential issue, we have increased our safety stock levels and adjusted our replacement algorithms. Additionally, our revenues and collections may also be adversely affected by transportation delays that could have a negative impact on our sales agreements. Although the recovery of the global economy is causing the aforementioned issues at ports and in the shipping industry, this situation is expected to be resolved gradually and to return to normal levels in the short term. However, if these issues continue for a longer period, our supply chain and our sales flow could be adversely impacted.

Our mining operations or metal production projects may be subject to stoppage and additional costs due to community actions and other factors.

In 2022, the political action of certain groups in Peru has prompted violence in the demands of certain communities, which affected Cuajone's operations. In February 2022, the railway between Cuajone and Ilo was blocked and the facilities at the Vina Blanca water reservoir were seized, cutting off the water supply to some residents of the Cuajone mining camp.

After several unsuccessful attempts by the authorities to restore order through dialogue efforts, in April 2022, the Peruvian government declared a state of emergency in the Moquegua region and the protesters returned the installations of the Vina Blanca water reservoir and the railway to the Company. Our personnel immediately evaluated the damage caused to the facilities by acts of vandalism and took the necessary steps to resume production at the Cuajone mining unit. As of today, the industrial railroad and the Cuajone mine, concentrator and related facilities are operating at full capacity.

On April 30, 2022 the Peruvian government issued a Ministerial Resolution to set up a three-party-dialogue-table with members of the community, government and Company officials to better understand all parties’ concerns. As of today, ten round-table meetings and two direct meetings with the community have been held. The Company has proposed plans to invest in social programs that address the needs voiced by the communities and has indicated interest in purchasing land near the Cuajone operations to establish a buffer zone to protect installations and production down the line.

However, we cannot guarantee that a recurrence of such incidents will not adversely impact other facilities, the results of our operations; and our financial position.

Table of Contents

Item 2. Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds:

SCC share repurchase program:

In 2008, the Company’s BOD authorized a $500 million share repurchase program that has since been increased by the BOD and is currently authorized to $3 billion. Pursuant to this program, the Company has purchased 119.5 million shares of common stock at a cost of $2.9 billion. These shares are available for general corporate purposes. The Company may purchase additional shares of its common stock from time to time, based on market conditions and other factors. This repurchase program has no expiration date and may be modified or discontinued at any time.

~~There has not been activity in the SCC share repurchase program since the third quarter of 2016.~~ The NYSE closing price of SCC common shares atas of September 30, ~~2017~~2022 was ~~$39.76~~$44.84 and the maximum number of shares that the Company could purchase at that price ~~is 2.1 million shares.~~

was 1.8 million. As a result of the repurchase of shares of SCC’s common stock, Grupo Mexico’s direct and indirect ownership was 88.9% as of September 30, ~~2017.~~2022. There has not been any activity in the SCC share repurchase program since the third quarter of 2016.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures:

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit No.			Description of Exhibit

3.1		(a) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed on October 11, 2005. (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(b) Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated May 2, 2006. (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-135170) filed on June 20, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
	(c) Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated May 28, 2008. (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).

3.2		By-Laws, as last amended on January 27, ~~2011.~~2022. (Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s ~~2010 Annual Report~~Form 8-K filed on ~~Form 10-K~~January 31, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).

4.1		Indenture governing $200 million 6.375% Notes due 2015, by and among Southern Copper Corporation, The Bank of New York and the Bank of New York (Luxembourg) S.A. (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 1, 2005 and incorporated by reference.

~~4.2~~	(a) Indenture governing $600 million 7.500% Notes due 2035, by and among Southern Copper Corporation, the Bank of New York and The Bank of New York (Luxembourg) S.A. (Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 1, 2005) and incorporated herein by reference).
	(b) Indenture governing $400 million 7.500% Notes due 2035, by and between Southern Copper Corporation, The Bank of New York, The Bank of New York (Luxembourg) S.A.(Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.3~~4.2		Form of 6.375% Note (included in Exhibit 4.1).

~~4.4~~4.3		Form of New 7.500% Note (included in Exhibit 4.2(a)).

~~4.5~~4.4		Form of New 7.500% Note (included in Exhibit 4.2(b)).

~~4.6~~4.5		Indenture, dated as of April 16, 2010, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which ~~$400 million of 5.375% Notes due 2020 and~~ $1.1 billion of 6.750% Notes due 2040 were issued (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.7~~4.6		First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 16, 2010, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 5.375% Notes due 2020 were issued (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.8~~	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 16, 2010, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 6.750% Notes due 2040 were issued. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.9~~4.7		~~Form of 5.375% Notes due 2020 (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).~~

~~4.10~~	Form of 6.750% Notes due 2040 (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.11~~4.8		Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 8, 2012, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 3.500% Notes due 2022 were issued (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.12~~4.9		Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 8, 2012, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 5.250% Notes due 2042 were issued. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.13~~4.10		Form of 3.500% Notes due 2022. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed

		on November 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

Table of Contents


Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit
~~4.14~~4.11		Form of 5.250% Notes due 2042. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.15~~4.12		Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 23, 2015, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 3.875% Notes due 2025 were issued. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.16~~4.13		Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 23, 2015, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 5.875% Notes due 2045 were issued. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.17~~4.14		Form of 3.875% Notes due 2025. (Filed as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.18~~4.15		Form of 5.875% Notes due 2045. (Filed as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

10.1		Directors’ Stock Award Plan of the Company, as amended through January ~~29, 2018.~~28, 2023. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s ~~2017~~2018 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference). The plan expired by its terms on January 30, 2017. A 5-year extension of the plan was approved by the Company’s stockholders at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.

10.2		Service Agreement entered into by the Company with a subsidiary of Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C. V., assigned upon the same terms and conditions to Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C.V. in February 2004 (Filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.3~~	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 21, 2004, by and among Southern Copper Corporation, SCC Merger ~~Sub.,~~Sub, Inc., Americas Sales Company, Inc., Americas Mining Corporation and Minera Mexico S.A. de C.V., (Filed as an Exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.4~~10.3		Tax Agreement entered into by the Company and Americas Mining Corporation, effective as of February 20, 2017. (Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).

14.0		Code of Business Conduct and Ethics adopted by the Board of Directors on May 8, 2003 and amended on ~~April 23, 2015.~~July 21, 2022. (Filed as Exhibit 1414.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed ~~April 29, 2015~~July 26, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).

15.0			Consent of Registered Public Accounting Firm (Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruiz Urquiza, S.C. - Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Limited) (filed herewith).
23.2		Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the Cuajone Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
23.3		Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the Toquepala Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
23.4		Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the Tia Maria Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
23.5		Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the Los Chancas Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
23.6		Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the Michiquillay Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).

Table of Contents


Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibit
23.7	Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for Buenavista del Cobre. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
23.8	Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the La Caridad Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
23.9	Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the Pilares Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
23.10	Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the El Pilar Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
23.11	Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the El Arco Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
23.12	Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the Charcas Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
23.13	Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the Santa Barbara Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).

23.14		Consent of Qualified Persons for Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the San Martin Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).

31.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

31.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32.1	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C., Section 1350. This document is being furnished in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238.

32.2	Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C., Section 1350. This document is being furnished in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238.
96.1	Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the Cuajone Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
96.2	Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the Toquepala Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
96.3	Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the Tia Maria Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
96.4	Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the Los Chancas Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
96.5	Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the Michiquillay Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).

Table of Contents


Exhibit No.			Description of Exhibit
96.6			Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for Buenavista del Cobre. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
96.7			Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the La Caridad Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
96.8			Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the Pilares Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
96.9			Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the El Pilar Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
96.10			Technical Report Summary of Mineral Reserves and Mineral Resources for the El Arco Project. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
96.11			Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the Charcas Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
96.12			Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the Santa Barbara Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).
96.13			Technical Report Summary of Mineral Resources for the San Martin Mine. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 10-K filed on March 7, 2022 and incorporated herein by reference).

101.INS			XBRL Instance Document (submitted electronically with this report). The instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (submitted electronically with this report).

101.CAL			XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document (submitted electronically with this report).

101.DEF			XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (submitted electronically with this report).

101.LAB			XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document (submitted electronically with this report).
			��
101.PRE			XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document (submitted electronically with this report).

104			The cover page from our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2022, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 1, 2021, is formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (“iXBRL”).

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in Inline XBRL ~~(Extensible~~(Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016;~~2021; (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30,

~~2017~~ 2022 and ~~2016;~~2021; (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and December 31, ~~2016;~~2021; (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, ~~2017~~2022 and ~~2016;~~2021; and (v) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements tagged in detail. Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

SIGNATURES

~~SIGNATURES~~

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION
	(Registrant)


	/s/ Oscar Gonzalez Rocha
	Oscar Gonzalez Rocha
	President and Chief Executive Officer

~~November 3, 2017~~October 31, 2022


	/s/ Raul Jacob
	Raul Jacob
	Vice President, Finance, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

~~November 3, 2017~~October 31, 2022

~~SOUTHERN COPPER CORPORATION~~

~~List of Exhibits~~

~~Exhibit No.~~		~~Description of Exhibit~~

~~3.1~~		(a) Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, filed on October 11, 2005. (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the third quarter of 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).
		(b) Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated May 2, 2006. (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-4, File No. 333-135170) filed on June 20, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
		(c) Certificate of Amendment of Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation dated May 28, 2008. (Filed as Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the second quarter of 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~3.2~~		~~By-Laws, as last amended on January 27, 2011. (Filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s 2010 Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporated herein by reference).~~

~~4.1~~		Indenture governing $200 million 6.375% Notes due 2015, by and among Southern Copper Corporation, The Bank of New York and the Bank of New York (Luxembourg) S.A. (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 1, 2005 and incorporated by reference.

~~4.2~~		(a) Indenture governing $600 million 7.500% Notes due 2035, by and among Southern Copper Corporation, the Bank of New York and The Bank of New York (Luxembourg) S.A. (Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 1, 2005) and incorporated herein by reference).
		(b) Indenture governing $400 million 7.500% Notes due 2035, by and between Southern Copper Corporation, The Bank of New York, The Bank of New York (Luxembourg) S.A.(Filed as Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed on August 1, 2005 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.3~~		~~Form of 6.375% Note (included in Exhibit 4.1).~~

~~4.4~~		~~Form of New 7.500% Note (included in Exhibit 4.2(a)).~~

~~4.5~~		~~Form of New 7.500% Note (included in Exhibit 4.2(b)).~~

~~4.6~~		Indenture, dated as of April 16, 2010, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which $400 million of 5.375% Notes due 2020 and $1.1 billion of 6.750% Notes due 2040 were issued (Filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.7~~		First Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 16, 2010, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 5.375% Notes due 2020 were issued (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.8~~		Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 16, 2010, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 6.750% Notes due 2040 were issued. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.9~~		~~Form of 5.375% Notes due 2020 (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).~~

~~4.10~~		~~Form of 6.750% Notes due 2040 (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 19, 2010 and incorporated herein by reference).~~

~~4.11~~		Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of November 8, 2012, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 3.500% Notes due 2022 were issued (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.12~~		Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 8, 2012, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 5.250% Notes due 2042 were issued. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.13~~		~~Form of 3.500% Notes due 2022. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).~~

~~4.14~~		~~Form of 5.250% Notes due 2042. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 9, 2012 and incorporated herein by reference).~~

~~4.15~~		Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 23, 2015, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 3.875% Notes due 2025 were issued. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.16~~		Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of April 23, 2015, between Southern Copper Corporation and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, pursuant to which the 5.875% Notes due 2045 were issued. (Filed as an Exhibit to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~4.17~~		~~Form of 3.875% Notes due 2025. (Filed as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).~~

~~4.18~~		~~Form of 5.875% Notes due 2045. (Filed as Exhibit A to Exhibit 4.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 24, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).~~

~~10.1~~		~~Directors’ Stock Award Plan of the Company, as amended through January 29, 2018. (Filed as an exhibit to the Company’s 2017 Proxy Statement and incorporated herein by reference).~~

~~10.2~~		Service Agreement entered into by the Company with a subsidiary of Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C. V., assigned upon the same terms and conditions to Grupo Mexico S.A.B. de C.V. in February 2004 (Filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.3~~		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of October 21, 2004, by and among Southern Copper Corporation, SCC Merger Sub., Inc., Americas Sales Company, Inc., Americas Mining Corporation and Minera Mexico S.A. de C.V., (Filed as an Exhibit to Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 22, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~10.4~~		Tax Agreement entered into by the Company and Americas Mining Corporation, effective as of February 20, 2017. (Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2017 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~14.0~~		Code of Business Conduct and Ethics adopted by the Board of Directors on May 8, 2003 and amended on April 23, 2015. (Filed as Exhibit 14 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed April 29, 2015 and incorporated herein by reference).

~~15.0~~		~~Consent of Registered Public Accounting Firm (Galaz, Yamazaki, Ruiz Urquiza, S.C. - Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, Limited) (filed herewith).~~

~~31.1~~		~~Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).~~

~~31.2~~		~~Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).~~

~~32.1~~		~~Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C., Section 1350. This document is being furnished in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238.~~

~~32.2~~		~~Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C., Section 1350. This document is being furnished in accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8238.~~

~~101.INS~~		~~XBRL Instance Document (submitted electronically with this report).~~

~~101.SCH~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document (submitted electronically with this report).~~

~~101.CAL~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase Document (submitted electronically with this report).~~

~~101.DEF~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document (submitted electronically with this report).~~

~~101.LAB~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase Document (submitted electronically with this report).~~

~~101.PRE~~		~~XBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase Document (submitted electronically with this report).~~

Attached as Exhibit 101 to this report are the following documents formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and

2016; (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016; (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; and (v) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements tagged in detail. Users of this data are advised pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T that this interactive data file is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

Year	Income Tax Rate		Dividend Tax Rate
2016	28.0	%	6.8	%
2017 and later	29.5	%	5	%

	Sales volume (million lbs.)	Priced at (per pound)		Month of settlement
Copper	52.5	$	2.94	From October 2017 to December 2017
Molybdenum	10.6	$	8.33	From October 2017 to December 2017

	At September 30, 2017		At December 31, 2016
Related parties receivable current:
Grupo Mexico and affiliates:
Asarco LLC	$	38.5	$	5.5
Mexico Generadora de Energia S. de R.L. (“MGE”)	31.6		10.2
Grupo Mexico	2.8		4.5
Compania Perforadora Mexico S.A.P.I. de C.V. and affiliates	1.4		1.3
Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollos, S.A. de C.V. and affiliates	1.2		1.5
Operadora de Generadoras de Energia Mexico S.A. de C.V.	—		0.1
Related to the controlling group:
Operadora de Cinemas S.A. de C.V.	0.3		0.2
Boutique Bowling de Mexico S.A. de C.V.	0.2		0.1
	$	76.0	$	23.4

	At September 30, 2017		At December 31, 2016
Related parties payable:
Grupo Mexico and affiliates:
MGE	$	44.5	$	13.9
Asarco LLC	23.5		36.3
Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollos, S.A. de C.V. and affiliates	9.1		7.8
Ferrocarril Mexicano S.A. de C.V.	4.1		3.0
Grupo Mexico	0.7		0.1
Eolica El Retiro, S.A.P.I. de C.V.	0.1		0.1
Related to the controlling group:
Boutique Bowling de Mexico S.A. de C.V.	0.4		0.2
Mexico Transportes Aereos S.A. de C.V. (“Mextransport”)	0.1		0.1
Operadora de Cinemas S.A. de C.V.	0.6		0.4
Related to SCC executive officers:
Breaker S.A. de C.V. and affiliates (“Breaker”)	—		0.3
	$	83.1	$	62.2

	2017		2016
Purchase activity
Asarco LLC	$	29.6	$	26.9
Eolica El Retiro, S.A.P.I. de C.V.	2.4		0.8
Ferrocarril Mexicano S.A de C.V.	34.2		33.9
Grupo Mexico	10.5		15.0
MGE	168.5		171.3
Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollos, S.A. de C.V. and affiliates	92.8		47.1
Total purchases	$	338.0	$	295.0

Sales activity
Asarco LLC	$	94.1	$	37.0
Compania Perforadora Mexico S.A.P.I. de C.V and affiliates	0.2		0.5
Grupo Mexico	0.1		0.6
MGE	77.8		72.6
Mexico Proyectos y Desarrollos, S.A. de C.V. and affiliates	—		0.3
Total sales	$	172.2	$	111.0

	2017		2016
Breaker	$	—	$	0.5
Higher Technology S.A.C.	—		1.0
Pigoba S.A. de C.V.	—		0.1
Servicios y Fabricaciones Mecanicas S.A.C.	0.2		0.4
Total purchases	$	0.2	$	2.0

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
	(in millions)
	Mexican Open-Pit		Mexican IMMSA Unit		Peruvian Operations		Corporate, other and eliminations			Consolidated

Net sales outside of segments	$	1,023.3	$	87.5	$	565.7	—			$	1,676.5
Intersegment sales			16.0				$	(16.0	)	—
Cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion)	373.6		73.8		350.6		(16.5		)	781.5
Selling, general and administrative	15.3		1.5		8.9		(0.7		)	25.0
Depreciation, amortization and depletion	97.1		13.1		55.1		4.0			169.3
Exploration	0.7		1.9		4.9		0.6			8.1
Operating income	$	536.6	$	13.2	$	146.2	$	(3.4	)	692.6
Less:
Interest, net										(69.8		)
Other income (expense)										(6.2		)
Income taxes										(220.1		)
Equity earnings of affiliate										6.3
Non-controlling interest										(1.0		)
Net income attributable to SCC										$	401.8

Capital investment	$	71.6	$	12.8	$	127.2	$	1.1		$	212.7
Property and mine development, net	$	5,109.2	$	374.1	$	3,198.7	$	246.3		$	8,928.3
Total assets	$	8,466.8	$	887.2	$	4,613.5	$	14.9		$	13,982.4

	Shares		Unit Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value

Outstanding shares at January 1, 2017	1,401,096		$	2.05
Granted	—		—
Exercised	(7,433	)	2.05
Forfeited	—		—
Outstanding shares at September 30, 2017	1,393,663		$	2.05

Outstanding shares at January 1, 2016	2,227,582		$	2.05
Granted	—		—
Exercised	(740,601	)	2.05
Forfeited	—		—
Outstanding shares at September 30, 2016	1,486,981		$	2.05

Description	Fair Value as of December 31, 2016		Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1)		Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
Assets:
Short term investment:
- Trading securities	$	49.2	$	49.2	—		$	—
- Available-for-sale debt securities:
Corporate bonds	—		—		—		—
Asset backed securities	—		—		—		—
Mortgage backed securities	2.1		—		$	2.1	—

Accounts receivable:
- Embedded derivatives - Not classified as hedges:
Provisionally priced sales:
Copper	203.8		203.8		—		—
Molybdenum	54.0		54.0		—		—
Total	$	309.1	$	307.0	$	2.1	$	—

Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2016	$	1,038.3
Less:
· Lower cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to higher capitalized ore stockpiles on leach pads, lower inventory consumption and lower power costs, partially offset by higher fuel and labor costs.	(49.9		)
· Lower depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.	(5.2		)
· Lower exploration expense.	(1.6		)
Plus:
· Higher selling, general and administrative expenses.	2.3
Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2017	$	983.9

Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2016	$	2,887.1
Plus:
· Higher cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to higher inventory consumption, foreign currency transaction effect, higher workers’ participation expense and higher fuel costs, partially offset by lower cost of metals purchased from third parties, and higher capitalized ore stockpiles on leach pads.	120.3
· Higher depreciation, amortization and depletion mainly as a result of our expansion and maintenance capital investments.	19.5
Less:
· Partial recovery of the Sonora River remediation costs due to the completion of remediation activities.	(10.2		)
· Lower selling, general and administrative expenses.	(3.9		)
· Lower exploration expense.	(11.5		)
Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2017	$	3,001.3

	Three Months Ended September 30,								Nine Months Ended September 30,
By-product Sales (in million pounds, except silver — in million ounces)	2017		2016		Variance		% Change		2017		2016		Variance		% Change
Peruvian operations
Molybdenum contained in concentrates	4.4		5.7		(1.3	)	(22.5	)%	13.8		17.2		(3.4	)	(19.7	)%
Silver	1.1		0.6		0.5		81.7	%	3.0		2.2		0.8		34.1	%

Mexican open-pit
Molybdenum contained in concentrates	7.5		6.6		0.9		14.1	%	21.9		19.1		2.8		14.5	%
Silver	2.5		2.8		(0.3	)	(10.7	)%	7.8		8.3		(0.5	)	(6.1	)%

Mexican IMMSA unit
Zinc — refined and in concentrate	43.1		54.0		(10.9	)	(20.1	)%	164.3		171.6		(7.3	)	(4.2	)%
Silver	1.0		1.4		(0.4	)	(25.8	)%	3.4		3.5		(0.1	)	(3.4	)%

Other and intersegment elimination
Silver	(0.4	)	(0.4	)	—		—		(1.3	)	(1.4	)	0.1		4.8	%

Total by-product sales
Molybdenum contained in concentrates	11.9		12.3		(0.4	)	(2.8	)%	35.7		36.3		(0.6	)	(1.7	)%
Zinc — refined and in concentrate	43.1		54.0		(10.9	)	(20.1	)%	164.3		171.6		(7.3	)	(4.2	)%
Silver	4.2		4.4		(0.2	)	(4.3	)%	12.9		12.6		0.3		1.7	%

Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2016	$	406.9
Plus:
· Higher cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to higher cost of metals purchased from third parties, higher inventory consumption, higher fuel costs and higher workers’ participation expense; partially offset by lower energy and operating contractors costs.	8.8
· Higher exploration expense.	2.8
· Higher depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.	1.1
Less:
· Lower selling, general and administrative expense.	(0.1		)
Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2017	$	419.5

Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2016	$	1,158.6
Plus:
· Higher cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to higher cost of metals purchased from third parties, higher fuel costs and higher workers’ participation expense; partially offset by lower energy and operating contractors costs, and lower inventory consumption.	51.8
Less:
· Lower depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.	(14.8		)
· Lower exploration expenses.	(0.5		)
· Lower selling, general and administrative expenses.	(2.2		)
Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2017	$	1,192.9

Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2016	$	570.9
Less:
· Lower cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to lower cost of metals purchased from third parties and higher capitalized ore stockpiles on leach pads; partially offset by higher fuel costs and higher workers participation expense.	(89.0		)
· Lower exploration expense.	(1.8		)
Plus:
· Higher selling, general and administrative expenses.	4.0
· Higher depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.	2.6
Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2017	$	486.7

Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2016	$	1,598.8
Less:
· Lower cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to lower cost of metals purchased from third parties, higher capitalized ore stockpiles on leach pads and lower sales expenses; partially offset by foreign currency transaction effect and inventory consumption.	(58.8		)
· Partial recovery of the Sonora River remediation costs due to the completion of remediation activities.	(10.2		)
· Lower selling, general and administrative expenses.	(1.1		)
· Lower exploration expenses.	(3.6		)
Plus:
· Higher depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.	28.7
Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2017	$	1,553.8

Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2016	$	93.4
Less:
· Lower depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.	(2.7		)
· Lower selling, general and administrative expenses.	(0.6		)
Plus:
· Higher exploration expense.	0.2
Operating cost and expenses for the third quarter 2017	$	90.3

Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2016	$	265.5
Plus:
· Higher cost of sales (exclusive of depreciation, amortization and depletion) mainly due to higher cost of metals purchased from third parties and higher power costs; partially offset by inventory consumption and foreign currency effect.	32.4
· Higher selling, general and administrative expenses.	0.3
Less:
· Lower exploration expenses.	(1.2		)
· Lower depreciation, amortization and depletion expense.	(0.6		)
Operating cost and expenses for the nine months 2017	$	296.4

	Effect on net earnings
	($ in millions)
Appreciation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. sol	$	4.1
Devaluation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. sol	$	(5.0	)
Appreciation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. Mexican peso	$	13.5
Devaluation of 10% in U.S. dollar vs. Mexican peso	$	(16.5	)