UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019

o☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 001-36714

JAGUAR HEALTH, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		46-2956775
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

201 Mission Street, Suite 2375

San Francisco, California 94105

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(415) 371-8300

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x☒ No o☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes x☒ No o☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer o☐	Accelerated filer o☐	Non-accelerated filer o☐	Smaller reporting company x☒
		~~(Do not check if a~~	Emerging growth company x☒
		~~smaller reporting company)~~

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. x☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o☐ No x☒

AsSecurities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of May 15, 2018, there were 171,350,166 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, outstanding, of which 131,048,929 are voting shares and 40,301,237 are non-voting shares. The company also had 5,524,926 shares of convertible preferred stock outstanding.the Act:

~~Table of Contents~~

	~~Page~~ ~~No.~~

Title of each class:	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered:
Common Stock, Par Value $0.0001 Per Share	JAGX	The NASDAQ Capital Market

As of May 14, 2019 there were 66,334,017 shares of voting common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, outstanding, 40,301,237 shares of non-voting common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, outstanding, and 5,524,926 shares of convertible preferred stock, par value $0.0001 per share, outstanding (convertible into 33,149,556 shares of voting common stock, subject to certain voting restrictions as provided in the Certificate of Designation for the convertible preferred stock)

Table of Contents


	Page No.
PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION ~~(Unaudited)~~	1
	Item 1. Unaudited Condensed Consolidated ~~Unaudited~~ Financial Statements	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets ~~as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017~~	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations ~~and Comprehensive Loss for the Three Month Periods Ended March 31, 2018 and 2017~~	2
	Condensed Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Changes in Common Stock, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity ~~(Deficit) for the period from December 31, 2016 through March 31, 2018~~	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows ~~for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2018 and 2017~~	4
	Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	56
	Item 2. ~~Management’s~~Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3533
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	6345
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures	6345
PART II. — OTHER INFORMATION	6448
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings	6448
	Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	6448
	Item 6. Exhibits	6550
SIGNATURE	~~SIGNATURE~~	6752

Table of Contents

PART I. — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

JAGUAR HEALTH, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


	March 31, 2019		December 31, 2018
Assets		(Unaudited)
Current assets:
Cash	$	2,571,778	$	2,568,191
Accounts receivable		914,758		995,683
Other receivable		2,296		6,118
Inventory		2,960,048		3,342,177
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		866,170		1,237,772
Total current assets		7,315,050		8,149,941
Property and equipment, net		745,405		760,617
Operating lease - right-of-use asset		1,077,701		—
Intangible assets, net		31,288,889		31,710,556
Other assets		235,488		420,831
Total assets	$	40,662,533	$	41,041,945

Liabilities, convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	6,563,892	$	5,414,260
Accrued liabilities		3,980,713		4,939,441
Warrant liability		1,275,443		220,376
Convertible debt - current, net of discount		11,149,944		11,239,170
Operating lease liability - current		521,787		—
Notes payable, net of discount		1,258,546		4,845,575
Total current liabilities		24,750,325		26,658,822
Operating lease liability - long-term		116,328		—
Total liabilities	$	24,866,653	$	26,658,822

Commitments and contingencies (See Note 6)

Series A convertible preferred stock: $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018; 5,524,926 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018; (redemption value and liquidation preference of $12,738,822 and $9,199,002 at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively)		9,000,002		9,000,002

Stockholders' equity:
Common stock - voting: $0.0001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively; 59,415,042 and 24,603,104 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively		5,942		2,460
Common stock - non-voting: $0.0001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018; 40,301,237 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018		4,030		4,030
Additional paid-in capital		109,640,556		99,927,410
Accumulated deficit		(102,854,650)		(94,550,779)
Total stockholders' equity		6,795,878		5,383,121
Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and stockholders' equity	$	40,662,533	$	41,041,945

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

March 31,

December 31,

2018

2017

(Unaudited)

(1)

Assets

Current assets:

Cash and cash equivalents

$
7,808,324

$
520,698

Restricted cash

—

239,169

Accounts receivable

362,809

467,658

Other receivable

2,414

1,380

Inventory

2,328,520

2,072,817

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

365,335

497,373

Total current assets

10,867,402

3,799,095

Land, property and equipment, net

1,213,564

1,222,068

Goodwill

5,210,821

5,210,821

Intangible assets, net

32,975,555

33,397,222

Total assets

$
50,267,342

$
43,629,206

Liabilities, Convertible Preferred Stock and Stockholders’ Equity

Current liabilities:

Accounts payable

$
3,162,179

$
7,354,932

Deferred collaboration revenue

—

177,389

Deferred rent

3,240

4,584

Accrued expenses

1,664,234

2,199,549

Warrant liability

192,960

103,860

Derivative liability

15,000

11,000

Conversion option liability

—

111,841

Convertible notes payable

690,683

2,672,215

Notes payable

3,656,099

1,141,153

Current portion of long-term debt

—

1,609,244

Total current liabilities

9,384,395

15,385,767

Convertible long-term debt, net of discount

10,875,300

10,982,437

Total liabilities

$
20,259,695

$
26,368,204

Commitments and Contingencies (See Note 7)

Series A convertible preferred stock: $0.0001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017; 5,524,926 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017; (liquidation preference of $9,199,002 at March 31, 2018)

$
9,000,002

$
—

Stockholders’ Equity:

Common stock: $0.0001 par value, 500,000,000 shares and 250,000,000 authorized at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively; 125,698,191 and 62,707,480 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

12,570

6,271

Common stock - non-voting: $0.0001 par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017; 42,617,893 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

4,262

4,262

Additional paid-in capital

89,092,172

79,655,191

Accumulated deficit

(68,101,359
)
(62,404,722
)
Total stockholders’ equity

21,007,645

17,261,002

Total liabilities, convertible preferred stock and stockholders’ equity

$
50,267,342

$
43,629,206

Table of Contents

JAGUAR HEALTH, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Product revenue, net	$	1,589,733	$	626,967
Collaboration revenue		—		177,389
Total revenue		1,589,733		804,356
Operating expenses
Cost of product revenue		864,943		464,161
Research and development		1,421,360		757,866
Sales and marketing		1,565,124		1,712,190
General and administrative		3,513,414		2,998,400
Total operating expenses		7,364,841		5,932,617
Loss from operations		(5,775,108)		(5,128,261)
Interest expense		(547,130)		(602,022)
Other income, net		6,384		297,500
Change in fair value of warrants, derivative liability and conversion option liability		(46,057)		(263,854)
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(1,941,960)		—
Net loss		(8,303,871)		(5,696,637)
Deemed dividend attributable to preferred stock		—		(995,000)
Net loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(8,303,871)	$	(6,691,637)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.24)	$	(0.75)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted		34,524,145		8,631,142

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JAGUAR HEALTH, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES

IN CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(Unaudited)


	Series A			Common			Common							Total
	Preferred Stock			stock - voting			stock - non-voting			Additional		Accumulated		Stockholders'
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		paid-in capital		deficit		Equity
Balances - January 1, 2018	—		$-	4,180,484		$ 6,271	42,617,893		$ 4,262		$ 79,655,191		$ (62,404,722)		$ 17,261,002
Issuance of preferred stock and common stock, March 2018	5,524,926		9,000,002	1,960,794		196	—		—		4,999,804		—		5,000,000
Beneficial conversion feature of the series A convertible preferred stock, March 2018	—		(995,000)	—		—	—		—		995,000		—		995,000
Deemed dividend on the series A convertible preferred stock, March 2018	—		995,000	—		—	—		—		(995,000)		—		(995,000)
Issuance of common stock, March 2018	—		—	716,425		72	—		—		1,305,702		—		1,305,774
Issuance of common stock, March 2018	—		—	478,853		48	—		—		750,052		—		750,100
Issuance of common stock in exchange for redemption of convertible debt	—		—	956,553		96	—		—		1,403,917		—		1,404,013
Issuance of common stock in exchange for services, March 2018	—		—	3,333		—	—		—		6,425		—		6,425
Issuance of common stock in exchange for payment of interest expense, March 2018	—		—	285,694		29	—		—		704,696		—		704,725
Stock-based compensation	—		—	—		—	—		—		272,243		—		272,243
Net loss	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		(5,696,637)		(5,696,637)
Balances - March 31, 2018	5,524,926	$	9,000,002	8,582,136	$	6,712	42,617,893	$	4,262	$	89,098,030	$	(68,101,359)	$	21,007,645

~~(1)~~ The condensed balance sheet at December 31, 2017 is derived from the audited financial statements at that date included in the Company’s Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2018.


	Series A			Common			Common							Total
	Preferred Stock			stock - voting			stock - non-voting			Additional		Accumulated		Stockholders'
	Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		Shares	Amount		paid-in capital		deficit		Equity
Balances - January 1, 2019	5,524,926	$	9,000,002	24,603,104	$	2,460	40,301,237	$	4,030	$	99,927,410	$	(94,550,779)	$	5,383,121
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs	—		—	13,333,333		1,335	—		—		2,501,560		—		2,502,895
Issuance of common stock in exchange of notes payable and accrued interest	—		—	18,764,637		1,876	—		—		6,072,354		—		6,074,230
Issuance of common stock in exchange of accrued interest, January 2018	—		—	1,382,636		138	—		—		446,591		—		446,729
Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs, March 2019	—		—	1,331,332		133	—		—		266,133		—		266,266
Stock-based compensation	—		—	—		—	—		—		426,508		—		426,508
Net loss	—		—	—		—	—		—		—		(8,303,871)		(8,303,871)
Balances - March 31, 2019	5,524,926	$	9,000,002	59,415,042	$	5,942	40,301,237	$	4,030	$	109,640,556	$	(102,854,650)	$	6,795,878

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JAGUAR HEALTH, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ~~OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS~~CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,		March 31,
	2019		2018
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(8,303,871)	$	(5,696,637)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization expense		436,880		329,561
Interest paid on the conversion of debt to equity		—		20,496
Common stock issued in exchange for services rendered		—		6,425
Loss on extinguishment of debt		1,941,960		—
Amortization of operating lease right-of-use-assets		56,575		—
Stock-based compensation		426,508		272,243
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount		178,180		403,824
Change in fair value of warrants, conversion option and derivative liability		46,057		267,854
Changes in assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		80,925		104,849
Other receivable		3,822		(1,034)
Inventory		382,130		(255,703)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		149,929		130,694
Other non-current assets		27,172		—
Deferred collaboration revenue		—		(177,389)
Operating lease liabilities		(93,235)		—
Accounts payable		1,149,632		(4,192,753)
Accrued expenses		51,762		(834,123)
Total cash used in operating activities		(3,465,574)		(9,621,693)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of equipment		—		(6,527)
Proceeds from disposal of equipment		—		—
Total cash used in investing activities		—		(6,527)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issuance of notes payable		800,000		—
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt		—		2,310,000
Repayment of notes payable		(100,000)		(1,689,199)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock through a stock purchase agreement with a private investor November 2017		—		1,305,774
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock, December 2017		—		750,100
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock, March 2018		—		5,000,000
Proceeds from the issuance of convertible preferred stock, March 2018		—		9,199,002
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, January to March 2019		2,502,895		—
Issuance of common stock, January 2019, net		266,266		—
Issuance costs associated with the issuance of convertible preferred stock, March 2018		—		(199,000)
Total cash provided by financing activities		3,469,161		16,676,677
Net increase in cash		3,587		7,048,457
Cash at beginning of period		2,568,191		759,867
Cash at end of period	$	2,571,778	$	7,808,324

~~(Unaudited)~~

Three Months Ended

March 31,

March 31,

2018

2017

Product revenue

$
626,967

$
74,544

Collaboration revenue

177,389

747,866

Total revenue

804,356

822,410

Operating Expenses

Cost of product revenue

464,161

16,145

Research and development expense

757,866

1,255,452

Sales and marketing expense

1,712,190

122,912

General and administrative expense

2,998,400

3,303,503

Total operating expenses

5,932,617

4,698,012

Loss from operations

(5,128,261
)
(3,875,602
)
Interest expense

(602,022
)
(180,072
)
Other income

297,500

1,448

Change in fair value of warrants and conversion option liability

(263,854
)
(453,419
)
Loss on extinguishment of debt

—

(207,713
)
Net loss and comprehensive loss

(5,696,637
)
(4,715,358
)
Deemed dividend attributable to preferred stock

(995,000
)
—

Net loss attributable to common shareholders

$
(6,691,637
)
$
(4,715,358
)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted

$
(0.05
)
$
(0.33
)
Weighted-average common shares outstanding, basic and diluted

129,467,132

14,157,351

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JAGUAR HEALTH, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF ~~CHANGES IN COMMON STOCK, CONVERTIBLE PREFERRED STOCK AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)~~CASH FLOWS (continued)

(Unaudited)

~~(Unaudited)~~

Series A Convertible Preferred
Stock

Common Stock

Common Stock - Non-voting

Additional Paid-in

Total Stockholders’

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Shares

Amount

Capital

Accumulated Deficit

Equity (Deficit)

Balances - December 31, 2016

—

$
—

14,007,132

$
1,401

—

$
—

$
37,980,522

$
(40,436,108
)
$
(2,454,185
)

Issuance of common stock in association with a June 2016 private investment in public entities offering, net of offering costs of $72,710

—

—

3,972,510

397

—

—

2,313,977

—

2,314,374

Issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities offering, net of offering costs of $6,000 June 2017

—

—

200,000

20

—

—

93,980

—

94,000

Issuance of common stock through a stock purchase agreement with a private investor, net of offering costs of $44,738 November 2017

—

—

5,100,000

510

—

—

554,752

—

555,262

Issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities offering

—

—

4,010,000

401

—

—

400,599

—

401,000

Issuance of common stock in the merger

—

—

2,282,445

228

—

—

1,277,941

—

1,278,169

Issuance of common stock in a July 2017 CSPA

—

—

3,243,243

325

—

—

2,999,675

—

3,000,000

Issuance of common stock in a follow-on offering registration statement October 2017, net of commissions and offering costs of $763,502

—

—

21,687,500

2,169

—

—

3,571,829

—

3,573,998

Issuance of common stock - non-voting in the merger

—

—

—

—

43,173,288

4,317

24,172,725

—

24,177,042

Conversion of non-voting common stock to common stock

—

—

555,395

55

(555,395
)
(55
)
—

—

—

Issuance of warrants in the merger

—

—

—

—

—

—

630,859

—

630,859

Issuance of stock options in the merger

—

—

—

—

—

—

5,691

—

5,691

Issuance of RSUs in the merger

—

—

—

—

—

—

3,300,555

—

3,300,555

Issuance of common stock in exchange for warrants

—

—

908,334

91

—

—

386,243

—

386,334

Stock-based compensation

—

—

—

—

—

—

814,613

—

814,613

Warrants, issued in conjunction with debt extinguishment

—

—

—

—

—

—

207,713

—

207,713

Issuance of common stock in exchange for vested restricted stock units

—

—

13,703

1

—

—

(1
)
—

—

Issuance of common stock in exchange for redemption of convertible debt

—

—

6,492,084

649

—

—

899,713

—

900,362

Issuance of common stock in exchange for services

—

—

235,134

24

—

—

43,805

—

43,829

Net and comprehensive loss

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(21,968,614
)
(21,968,614
)

Balances - December 31, 2017

—

$
—

62,707,480

$
6,271

42,617,893

$
4,262

$
79,655,191

$
(62,404,722
)
$
17,261,002

Issuance of preferred stock and common stock in a private investment in public entities March 2018

5,524,926

$
9,000,002

29,411,766

2,940

—

—

4,997,060

—

5,000,000

Beneficial conversion feature of the series A convertible preferred stock

—

(995,000
)

—

—

—

—

995,000

—

995,000

Deemed dividend on the series A convertible preferred stock

—

995,000

—

—

—

—

(995,000
)
—

(995,000
)

Issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities November 2017

—

—

9,746,413

975

—

—

1,304,799

—

1,305,774

Issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities January 2018

—

—

7,182,818

718

—

—

749,382

—

750,100

Issuance of common stock in exchange for redemption of convertible debt

—

—

12,314,291

1,232

—

—

1,402,781

—

1,404,013

Issuance of common stock in exchange for services

—

—

50,000

5

—

—

6,420

—

6,425

Issuance of common stock in exchange for payment of interest expense

—

—

4,285,423

429

—

—

704,296

—

704,725

Stock-based compensation

—

—

—

—

—

—

272,243

—

272,243

Net and comprehensive loss

—

—

—

—

—

—

—

(5,696,637
)
(5,696,637
)

Balances - March 31, 2018

5,524,926

$
9,000,002

125,698,191

$
12,570

42,617,893

$
4,262

$
89,092,172

$
(68,101,359
)
$
21,007,645


		Three Months Ended
		March 31,		March 31,
		2019		2018
Supplemental schedule of non-cash financing and investing activities
Interest paid on long-term debt	$	-	$	19,344
Common stock issued as redemption of notes payable and related interest	$	-	$	950,000
Common stock issued as redemption of notes payable and related interest	$	-	$	1,158,308
Deemed dividend attributable to preferred stock	$	-	$	995,000
Repayment of accrued interest on note payable by issuance of common stock	$	446,729	$	-
Repayment of Note Payable principal by issuance of common stock	$	4,374,108	$	-
Issuance of March 2019 letter of credit warrant	$	116,297	$
Issuance of warrants with Notes Payable	$	892,713	$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

JAGUAR HEALTH, INC.

~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS~~

~~(Unaudited)~~

Three Months Ended

March 31,

March 31,

2018

2017

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Net loss

$
(5,696,637
)
$
(4,715,358
)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

Depreciation and amortization expense

329,561

15,031

Interest paid on the conversion of debt to equity

20,496

—

Common stock issued in exchange for services rendered

6,425

—

Loss on extinguishment of debt

—

207,713

Stock-based compensation

272,243

228,036

Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount

403,824

96,772

Change in fair value of warrants and conversion option liability

263,854

453,419

Change in fair value of derivative liability

4,000

—

Changes in assets and liabilities

Accounts receivable

104,849

4,963

Other receivable

(1,034
)
(288,166
)
Inventory

(255,703
)
20,114

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

132,038

(85,218
)
Deferred offering costs

—

7,632

Due from former parent

—

78,226

Deferred collaboration revenue

(177,389
)
2,088,989

Deferred product revenue

—

(16,196
)
Deferred rent

(1,344
)
158

Accounts payable

(4,192,753
)
931,340

Accrued expenses

(834,123
)
683,825

Total cash used in operations

(9,621,693
)
(288,720
)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Purchase of equipment

(6,527
)
—

Total cash used in investing activities

(6,527
)
—

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt

2,310,000

—

Repayment of long-term debt

(1,689,199
)
(490,101
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities June 2016

—

550,434

Issuance costs associated with the issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities June 2016

—

(7,632
)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock through a stock purchase agreement with a private investor November 2017

1,305,774

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities December 2017

750,100

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities March 2018

5,000,000

—

Proceeds from the issuance of convertible preferred stock in private investment in public entities March 2018

9,199,002

—

Issuance costs associated with the issuance of convertible preferred stock in a private investment in public entities March 2018

(199,000
)

Total Cash Provided by Financing Activities

16,676,677

52,701

Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

7,048,457

(236,019
)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period

759,867

1,462,272

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period

$
7,808,324

$
1,226,253

Supplemental Schedule of Non-Cash Financing and Investing Activities

Interest paid on long-term debt

$
19,344

$
—

Common stock issued as redemption of Jaguar notes payable and related interest

$
950,000

$
—

Common stock issued as redemption of Napo notes payable and related interest

$
1,158,308

$
—

Deemed dividend attributable to preferred stock

$
995,000

$
—

~~Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash~~:

March 31,
2018

March 31,
2017

Cash and cash equivalents

$
7,808,324

$
1,205,061

Restricted cash

—

21,192

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

$
7,808,324

$
1,226,253

~~The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

~~JAGUAR HEALTH, INC.~~

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. Organization and Business

Jaguar Health, Inc. (“Jaguar”, “we” or the “Company”), formerly known as Jaguar Animal Health, Inc., was incorporated on June 6, 2013 (inception) in Delaware. The Company was a majority-owned subsidiary of Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Napo” or the “Former Parent”) until the close of the ~~Company’s~~Company's initial public offering on May 18, 2015. The Company was formed to develop and commercialize first-in-class gastrointestinal products for companion and production animals and horses. The ~~Company’s~~Company's first commercial product, Neonorm Calf, was launched in 2014 and Neonorm Foal was launched in the first quarter of 2016. The ~~Company’s~~Company's activities are subject to significant risks and uncertainties, including failing to secure additional funding in order to timely ~~compete~~complete the development and commercialization of products. ~~The Company manages its operations through two segments—human health and animal health and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.~~

On June 11, 2013, Jaguar issued 2,666,666 shares of common stock to Napo in exchange for cash and services. On July 1, 2013, Jaguar entered into an employee leasing and overhead agreement (the “Service Agreement”) with Napo, under which Napo agreed to provide the Company with the services of certain Napo employees for research and development and the general administrative functions of the Company. See Note 9 for additional information regarding the capital contributions and Note 5 for the Service Agreement and license agreement details. Effective July 1, 2016, Napo agreed to reimburse the Company for the use of the Company’s employee’s time and related expenses, including rent and a fixed overhead amount to cover office supplies and copier use (Note 5).

On July 31, 2017, Jaguar completed a merger with Napo pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 31, 2017 by and among Jaguar, Napo, Napo Acquisition Corporation (“Merger Sub”), and ~~Napo’s~~Napo's representative (the “Merger Agreement”). In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, upon the completion of the merger, Merger Sub merged with and into Napo, with Napo surviving as our wholly-owned subsidiary (the “Merger” or “Napo Merger”). Immediately following the Merger, Jaguar changed its name from “Jaguar Animal Health, Inc.” to “Jaguar Health, Inc.” Napo now operates as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jaguar focused on human health and the ongoing commercialization of Mytesi, a Napo drug product approved by the U.S. FDA for the symptomatic relief of noninfectious diarrhea in adults with HIV/AIDS on antiretroviral therapy.

The Company manages its operations through two segments—human health and animal health and is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Reverse stock-split

~~Liquidity~~On May 18, 2018, the stockholders of Jaguar approved at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company and the Board approved, in accordance with the authority granted by the Company's stockholders at the Annual Meeting, a 1‑for‑15 reverse stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock, effective June 1, 2018. The reverse split has been retrospectively reflected in all voting and non-voting common stock, warrants, and common stock option shares disclosed in these condensed consolidated financial statements. The non-voting common stock and the convertible preferred stock were excluded from the reverse split.

Liquidity and Going Concern

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred recurring operating losses since inception and has an accumulated deficit of ~~$68,101,359~~$102.9 million as of March 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The Company expects to incur substantial losses in future periods. Further, the ~~Company’s~~Company's future operations are dependent on the success of the ~~Company’s~~Company's ongoing development and commercialization efforts, as well as ~~the~~ securing of additional financing. There is no assurance that profitable operations, if ever achieved, could be sustained on a continuing basis.

The Company plans to finance its operations and capital funding needs through equity and/or debt financing, collaboration arrangements with other entities, as well as revenue from future product sales. However, there can be no assurance that additional funding will be available to the Company on acceptable terms on a timely basis, if at all, or that the Company will generate sufficient cash from operations to adequately fund operating needs or ultimately achieve profitability. If the Company is unable to obtain an adequate level of financing needed for the long-term development and commercialization of its products, the Company will need to curtail planned activities and reduce costs. Doing so will likely have an adverse effect on the ~~Company’s~~Company's ability to execute on its business plan. These matters raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue in existence as a going concern within one year after the

Table of Contents

issuance date of the condensed consolidated financial statements. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

~~In June 2016, the Company~~On January 7, 2019, Jaguar entered into a common stock purchase agreement with ~~a private investor (the “CSPA”), which provides that, upon the terms and subject~~Oasis Capital, relating to ~~the conditions and limitations set forth therein, the investor is committed to purchase up to~~an offering of an aggregate of ~~$15.0 million~~up to 5,333,333 shares of common stock via an equity line of credit. Under the terms of the ~~Company’s~~purchase agreement, the Company has the right to "put," or sell, up to 5,333,333 shares of common stock ~~over~~to Oasis Capital for an amount equal to the ~~approximately 30-month term~~product of ~~the agreement. Through March 31, 2018 the Company sold 6,000,000 shares for gross cash proceeds of $5,063,785. The CSPA limited~~(i) the number of shares ~~that~~set forth on the applicable put notice (minus the deposit and clearing fees associated with such purchase) and (ii) a fixed price of $0.75 per share or such other price agreed upon between the Company ~~can sell thereunder~~and Oasis Capital. Jaguar had the option to ~~2,027,490~~increase the equity line of credit by an additional 8,000,000 shares ~~which equals 19.99%~~ of common stock by notifying Oasis Capital at any time after the ~~Company’s outstanding shares as of the~~effective date of the ~~CSPA (such limit, the “19.99% exchange cap”), unless either (i)~~purchase agreement. In March 2019, Jaguar exercised this option. As of March 31, 2019, the Company ~~obtains stockholder approval~~had sold all of the 5,333,333 shares of common stock of the equity line and all 8,000,000 shares of common stock from the option to Oasis Capital.

Between January through March 31, 2019, Jaguar entered into exchange agreements with Chicago Venture Partners L.P., pursuant to which the Company issued to CVP 18,764,637 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $6.1 million, in exchange for a reduction of approximately $4.4 million in the principal amount of the CVP Promissory Notes and $1.7 million in accrued interest thereon.

In March 2019, Jaguar began entering into securities purchase agreements with selected accredited investors, pursuant to which the Company intends to issue ~~more than~~up to $5.5 million aggregate principal amount of promissory notes to such ~~19.99% exchange cap or (ii)~~Investors. As an inducement for entering into the ~~average price paid~~Securities Purchase Agreement, each investor will also receive warrants exercisable for ~~all~~ shares of the Company’s common ~~stock issued under the CSPA is equal to or greater than $1.32 per share (the closing price on the date the CSPA was signed), in either case in compliance~~stock. As of March 31, 2019, two Notes with ~~Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d).~~an aggregate principal of $800,000 had been issued.

~~At the 2017 Annual Stockholders’ Meeting on May 8, 2017, the Company’s stockholders voted on the approval,~~In March 2019, Jaguar entered into a securities purchase agreement with Oasis Capital pursuant to ~~Nasdaq Listing Rule 5635(d), of the issuance of an additional 3,555,514 shares of the Company’s common stock under the CSPA,~~ which ~~when combined with the 2,444,486 shares that the Company has already sold pursuant~~Jaguar agreed to ~~the CSPA, equals~~issue and sell, in a registered public offering by Jaguar directly to Oasis, an aggregate of ~~6,000,000 shares.~~1,331,332 shares of common stock at an offering price of $0.20 for gross proceeds of approximately $266,266.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and ~~applicable rules and regulations of~~on a basis consistent with the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Our unaudited condensed~~annual consolidated financial statements, and in the opinion of management, reflect all adjustments, which ~~are, in the opinion of management,~~include only normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of ~~our~~the periods presented. These interim financial ~~position and~~ results of operations. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, unless otherwise noted. The balance sheet as of March 31, 2018 and the results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the ~~entire year.~~year ending December 31, 2019, or for any other future annual or interim period. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

There has been a material change to the Company's significant accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2019, as compared to the significant accounting policies described in Note 2 of the “Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements” in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. The Company adopted ACS 842 “Leases” and implemented a new policy to account for modifications of preferred stock using the model in ASC 470-50.

~~Principles~~Principals of Consolidation

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP and applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and include the accounts of the

Table of Contents

Company and its wholly owned ~~subsidiaries.~~subsidiary. All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the Company’s management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in its consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. The accounting policies that reflect the Company’s more significant estimates and judgments and that the Company believes are the most critical to aid in fully understanding and evaluating its reported financial results are valuation of stock options; valuation of warrant liabilities; valuation of derivative liability, impairment testing of goodwill, acquired in-process research and development (“IPR~~&D,~~&D"), and long lived assets; useful lives for depreciation and amortization; valuation adjustments for excess and obsolete inventory; allowance for doubtful accounts; deferred taxes and valuation allowances on deferred tax assets; evaluation and measurement of contingencies; and recognition of revenue, including estimates for product returns. Those estimates could change, and as a result, actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

~~Concentration of Credit Risk and Cash and Cash Equivalents~~

Concentrations

Cash is the financial instrument that potentially subjects the Company to a concentration of credit risk as cash is deposited with a bank and cash balances are generally in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limits. The carrying value of cash approximates fair value at March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

For the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, substantially all of the Company’s revenue has been derived from the sale of Mytesi. For the three months ended March 31, 2019, the Company earned Mytesi revenue primarily from two pharmaceutical distributors in the United States. For the three months ended March 31, 2018, the Company earned Mytesi revenue primarily from four pharmaceutical distributors in the United States, each of whom amounted to a percentage of total net revenue of at least 10%. Revenue earned from each as a percentage of total net revenue is as follows:


Consolidated (percentage of total net sales)	For the three months ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
Customer 1	68	%	20	%
Customer 2	30	%	—	%
Customer 3	—	%	21	%
Customer 4	—	%	21	%
Customer 5	—	%	18	%
Other*	2	%	20	%
	100	%	100	%

*- No other customer represented more than 10% of net sales

The Company is subject to credit risk from its accounts receivable related to its sales. The Company generally does not perform evaluations of customers' financial condition and generally does not require collateral. The Company's significant pharmaceutical distributors and their related accounts receivable balance as a percentage of total accounts receivable were as follows:


	As of		As of
	March 31,		March 31,
	2019		2018
Customer 1	75	%	—	%
Customer 2	24	%	95	%
Customer 3	1	%	5	%

No other customer represented more than 10% of the Company's accounts receivable balances as of those dates.

Table of Contents

The Company is subject to credit risk from its inventory suppliers. The Company sources drug substance from a single supplier and drug product from a single supplier.

Fair Values

The Company’s financial instruments include, cash, ~~and cash equivalents,~~ accounts receivable, accounts payable, ~~accrued expenses,~~ warrant liabilities, derivative liability, debt conversion option liability, and debt. Cash is reported at fair value. The recorded carrying amount of accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses reflect their fair value due to their short-term nature. The carrying value of the interest-bearing debt approximates fair value based upon the borrowing rates currently available to the Company for bank loans with similar terms and maturities. See Note 43 for the fair value ~~measurements, and Note 8 for the fair value of the Company’s warrant liabilities, derivative liability, and debt conversion option liability.~~measurements.

~~Restricted Cash~~

On August 18, 2015, the Company entered into a long-term loan and security agreement with a lender for up to $8.0 million, which, along with subsequent loan amendments, required the Company to maintain a base minimum cash balance of varying amounts. The restricted cash balance related to the loan was $0 and $239,169 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or net ~~realizeable~~realizable value. The Company calculates inventory valuation adjustments when conditions indicate that ~~market~~net realizable value is less than cost due to physical deterioration, usage, obsolescence, reductions in estimated future demand or reduction in selling price. Inventory write-downs are measured as the difference between the cost of inventory and net ~~realizeable~~realizable value.

Land, Property and Equipment

Land is stated at cost, reflecting fair value of the property at July 31, 2017, the date of the ~~merger with Napo.~~

Napo merger. Equipment ~~and furniture and fixtures are~~is stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Equipment begins to be depreciated when it is placed into service. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of 3 to 10 years.

Expenditures for repairs and maintenance of assets are charged to expense as incurred. Costs of major additions and betterments are capitalized and depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Upon retirement or sale, the cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets disposed of are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is included in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

Long-Lived Assets

The Company regularly reviews the carrying value and estimated lives of all of its long-lived assets, including property and equipment to determine whether indicators of impairment may exist that warrant adjustments to carrying values or estimated useful lives. The determinants used for this evaluation include management’s estimate of the asset’s ability to generate positive income from operations and positive cash flow in future periods as well as the strategic significance of the assets to the Company’s business objectives.

Definite-lived intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated periods benefited, and are reviewed ~~regularly~~when appropriate for possible impairment.

Leases

ASC Topic 842, Leases, requires lessees to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for all leases with a term of greater than 12 months regardless of their classification on the balance sheet and to provide expanded disclosures about leasing arrangements. The Company adopted Topic 842 effective January 1, 2019 using the optional transition method and did not restate comparative periods. There was no effect on accumulated deficit at adoption.

The Company has elected the package of practical expedients to (i) not reassess whether expired or existing contracts are or contain leases, (ii) not reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and (iii) not reassess the accounting for initial direct costs.

Table of Contents

The adoption of the new leases standard resulted in the following adjustments to the consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019:

December 31, 2018

Adoption Impact

January 1, 2019

(unaudited)
Operating lease right-of-use assets
—

1,111,214

1,111,214
Operating leases liabilities, current portion
—

336,647

336,647
Operating leases liabilities, long term
—

394,703

394,703
Deferred rent
379,864

(379,864)

—

At the inception of an arrangement, the Company determines whether the arrangement is or contains a lease based on the unique facts and circumstances present. Operating lease liabilities and their corresponding right-of-use assets are recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable. As such, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate incurred to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term, an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. Certain adjustments to the right-of-use asset may be required for items such as initial direct costs paid or incentives received.

Operating Lease

The Company has a non-cancelable operating lease with CA-Mission Street Limited Partnership for its offices in San Francisco, California through September 1, 2020. The lease agreement calls for monthly base rents between $38,391 and $40,730 over the term of the lease.

Prior to the Company’s adoption of ASC 842 on January 1, 2019, the Company recorded lease expense for its operating leases in accordance with ASC 840.

Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and in between annual tests if events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have occurred. The test is based on a comparison of the reporting ~~unit’s~~unit's book value to its estimated fair market value. The Company performs the annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year using the opening consolidated balance sheet as of the first day of the fourth quarter, with any resulting impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.

~~If the carrying value~~ The Company did not record an impairment of ~~a reporting unit’s net assets exceeds its fair value, the~~ goodwill would be considered impaired and would be reduced to its fair value. The goodwill was entirely allocated to the human health reporting unit as the goodwill relates to the Napo Merger. The decline in market capitalization during the ~~year~~three months ended ~~December~~March 31, 2017 was determined to be a triggering event for potential goodwill impairment. Accordingly the Company performed the goodwill impairment analysis. The Company utilized the market capitalization plus a reasonable control premium in the performance of its impairment test. The market capitalization was based on the outstanding shares2019 and the average market share price for the 30 days prior to December 31, 2017. Based on the results of the Company’s impairment test, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $16,827,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017. If the market capitalization decreases in the future, a reasonable possibility exists that goodwill could be further impaired in the near term and that such impairment may be material to the financial statements.2018.

Fair value determinations require considerable judgment and are sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions, estimates and market factors. Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans, as well as industry and economic conditions. These assumptions and estimates include projected revenues and income growth rates, terminal growth rates, competitive and consumer trends, market-based discount rates, and other market factors. If current expectations of future growth rates are not met or market factors outside of our control, such as discount rates, change significantly, this may lead to a further goodwill impairment in the future. Acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D) are intangible assets initially recognized at fair value and classified as indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. During the development period, these assets will not be amortized as charges to earnings; instead these assets will be tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if impairment indicators are identified. ~~We booked~~The Company analyzed and determined that there was no impairment to IPR&D in the three months ended March 31, 2019 due to the January 2019 change in distributors from Mission to Cardinal Health. The Company did not record an impairment of $2,300,000 in the year ended December 31, 2017. The impairment loss is measured based on the excess of the carrying amount over the asset’s fair value. The loss resulted from the Company’s termination of the clostridium dificil infection program.

~~Additionally, as goodwill and~~for indefinite-lived intangible assets ~~associated with recently acquired businesses are recorded on~~during the ~~balance sheet at their estimated acquisition date fair values, those amounts are more susceptible to an impairment risk if business operating results or macroeconomic conditions deteriorate.~~three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018.

In connection with each annual impairment assessment and any interim impairment assessment in which indicators of impairment have been identified, the Company compares the fair value of the asset as of the date of the assessment with the carrying value of the asset on the consolidated balance sheet. If impairment is indicated by this test, the intangible asset is written down by the amount by which the discounted cash flows expected from the intangible asset exceeds its carrying value.

Research and Development Expense

Research and development expense consists of expenses incurred in performing research and development activities including related salaries, clinical trial and related drug and non-drug product costs, contract services and other outside service expenses. Research and development expense is charged to operating expense in the period incurred.

~~Revenue Recognition~~

Table of Contents

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), which was adopted on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method, which was elected to apply to all ~~contracts.~~active contracts as of the adoption date. Application of the modified retrospective method did not impact amounts previously reported by the Company, nor did it require a cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption, as the ~~Company’s~~Company's method of recognizing revenue under ASC 606 ~~was~~yielded similar results to the method utilized immediately prior to adoption. Accordingly, there iswas no ~~need for the Company~~effect to ~~dislose the amount by which~~ each financial statement line item ~~was affected~~ as a result of applying the new revenue ~~standard~~standard.

Practical Expedients, Elections, and ~~an explanation of significant changes.~~

Exemptions

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the core ~~principal~~principle of ASC 606 or when there is a transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.

The Company used a practical expedient available under ASC 606‑10‑65‑1(f)4 that permits it to consider the aggregate effect of all contract modifications that occurred before the beginning of the earliest period presented when identifying satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations, transaction price, and allocating the transaction price to the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations.

~~Contracts~~The Company also used a practical expedient available under ASC 606‑10‑32‑18 that permits it to not adjust the amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component if, at contract inception, the expected period between the transfer of promised goods or services and customer payment is one year or less.

The Company has elected to treat shipping and handling activities as fulfillment costs.

Additionally, the Company elected to record revenue net of sales and other similar taxes.

Contracts

Effective January 16, 2019, Napo ~~has a Marketing and Distribution Agreement (“M&D Agreement”) with BexR Logistix, LLC (“BexR” or “Mission Pharmacal” or “Mission”), in April 2016 to appoint BexR~~Pharmaceuticals, Inc. engaged Cardinal Health as its ~~distributor with~~exclusive third party logistics distribution agent for commercial sales for the ~~right~~Company’s Mytesi product and to ~~market~~perform certain other services which include, without limitation, storage, distribution, returns, customer support, financial support, EDI and ~~sell, and the exclusive right~~system access support (Exclusive Distribution Agreement) .

In addition to distribute Mytesi (formerly Fulyzaq) in US. The term of the M&D Agreement is 4 years. The M&D Agreement will renew automatically for successive one year terms unless either party provides a written notice of termination not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the initial or subsequent terms. Napo retains control of Mytesi held at Mission.

Napo sells Mytesi through Mission, who then sells Mytesi to its distributors and wholesalers — McKesson, Cardinal Health, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation (“ABC”), HD Smith, Smith Drug and Publix (together “Distributors”). Mission sells Mytesi to their Distributors, on behalf of Napo, under agreements executed by Mission with these Distributors and Napo abides by the terms and conditions of ~~sales agreed between Mission~~the Agreement, Cardinal Health’s purchase of products, and ~~their Distributors.~~assumption of title therein, is set forth in the Title Model Addendum. The Title Model Addendum states that upon receipt of product at the 3PL Facility (Cardinal Health ~~care providers order Mytesi through pharmacies who obtain Mytesi through Mission’s Distributors. Napo considers the Distributors of Mission as its customers.~~

~~Mission’s Distributors are the customers of~~in La Vergne, Tennessee) from the Company, title and risk of loss for the Mytesi product purchased by Cardinal Health (excluding consigned inventory) shall pass to Cardinal Health, and title and risk of loss for consigned inventory shall remain with ~~respect to purchase of Mytesi. The M&D Agreement~~Client until purchased by Cardinal Health in accordance with ~~Mission, Mission’s agreement with its Distributors and~~this Addendum. Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. considers Cardinal Health the ~~related purchase order will together meet~~Company’s exclusive customer for Mytesi products per the ~~contract existence criteria under ASC 606-10-25-1.~~Cardinal Health Exclusive Distribution agreement.

~~Jaguar’s~~Jaguar's Neonorm and Botanical extract products are primarily sold to distributors, who then sell the products to the end customers. Since 2014, the Company has entered into several distribution agreements with established distributors such as Animart, Vedco, VPI, RJ Matthews, Henry Schein, and Stockmen Supply to distribute the ~~Company’s~~Company's products in the United States, Japan, and China. The distribution agreements and the related purchase order together meet the contract existence criteria under ~~ASXC 606-10-25-1.~~ASC 606‑10‑25‑1. Jaguar sells directly to its customers without the use of an agent.

Table of Contents

Performance obligations

For ~~the~~animal products sold by ~~each of Napo and~~ Jaguar Health, the single performance obligation identified above is the Company’s promise to transfer the Company’s ~~product Mytesi~~animal products to ~~Distributors~~distributors based on specified payment and shipping terms in the arrangement. Product warranties are assurance type warranties that do not represent a performance obligation. For the Company’s human product, Mytesi, which is sold by Napo Pharmaceuticals Inc., the single performance obligation identified above is the Company’s promise to transfer Mytesi to Cardinal Health, the Company’s exclusive distributor for the product, based on specified payment and shipping terms as outlined in the Exclusive Distribution Agreement. The product warranties are assurance type warranties that do not represent a performance obligation.

Transaction price

For both ~~Jaugar~~Jaguar and Napo, the transaction price is the amount of consideration to which the Company expects to collect in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. The transaction price of Mytesi and Neonorm is the Wholesaler ~~Aquistion~~Acquisition Cost (“WAC”), net of ~~variable considerations~~discounts, returns, and price adjustments.

Allocate transaction price

For both Napo and Jaguar, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance ~~obligaton~~obligation contained in each contract.

Point in time recognition

For both Napo and Jaguar, a single performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time, upon the ~~FOB~~free on board (“FOB”) terms of each contract when control, including title and all risks, has transferred to the customer.

Disaggregation of Product Revenue

Human

Sales of Mytesi are recognized as revenue when the products are delivered to the ~~wholesalers. Revenues~~Cardinal wholesaler. Net revenues from the sale of Mytesi were $1,543,121 and $583,269 ~~and $0 in~~for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively. The Company recorded a reserve for estimated product returns under terms of agreements with wholesalers based on its historical returns experience. Reserves for returns at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were immaterial. If actual returns differed from our historical experience, changes to the reserved could be required in future periods.

Animal

The Company recognized Neonorm revenues of ~~$43,698~~$46,612 and ~~$44,544~~$43,698 for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017, respectively, and Botanical Extract revenues of $0 and $30,000 in the three months ended March 31,~~ 2018, ~~and 2017,~~ respectively. Revenues are recognized upon shipment which is when title ~~has~~and control is transferred to the buyer. Sales of Neonorm Calf and Foal to distributors are made under agreements that may provide distributor price adjustments and rights of return under certain circumstances. Reserves for returns are analyzed periodically and are estimated based on historical return data. Reserves for returns and price adjustments at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were immaterial. Sales of Botanical Extract are recognized as revenue when the product is delivered to the customer which do not provide for return rights.

Collaboration Revenue

On January 27, 2017, the Company entered into a licensing, development, co-promotion and commercialization agreement with Elanco US Inc. (“Elanco”) to license, develop and commercialize Canalevia, the ~~Company’s~~Company's drug product candidate under investigation for treatment of acute and chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in dogs, and other drug product formulations of crofelemer for treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, conditions and symptoms in cats and other companion animals. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received an initial upfront payment of $2,548,689, inclusive of reimbursement of past product and development expenses of $1,048,689, which was recognized as revenue ratably over the estimated development period of one year resulting in $177,389 and $459,700 in collaboration revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In addition to the upfront payments, Elanco reimbursed the Company for $0 and $288,166 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 for certain development and regulatory expenses related to the planned target animal safety study and the completion of the Canalevia field study for acute diarrhea in dogs which were also included in collaboration revenue.

Table of Contents

On September 24, 2018, the ~~effective date~~Company entered into a Distribution, License and Supply Agreement ("License Agreement") with Knight Therapeutics, Inc. ("Knight"). The License Agreement has a term of ~~termination~~15 years (with automatic renewals) and provides Knight with an exclusive right to commercialize current and future Jaguar human health products (including Crofelemer, Lechlemer, and any product containing a proanthocyanidin or with an anti-secretory mechanism) in Canada and Israel. In addition, Knight was granted a right of first negotiation for expansion to Latin America. Under the License Agreement, Knight is responsible for applying for and obtaining necessary regulatory approvals in the territory of Canada and Israel, as well as marketing, sales and distribution of the ~~Elanco Agreement,~~licensed products. Knight will pay a transfer price for all ~~licenses granted to Elanco by the Company under the Elanco Agreement were revoked~~licensed products, and ~~the rights granted thereunder reverted back to the Company. Provisions in the agreement providing for the receipt of additional payments~~ upon achievement of certain ~~development,~~ regulatory and sales milestones, Jaguar may receive payments from Knight in an aggregate amount of up to ~~$61.0~~approximately $18 million payable throughout the initial 15-year term of the ~~Elanco Agreement, as well as product development expense reimbursement for any additional product development expenses incurred, and royalty payments on global sales terminated on termination of the~~ agreement.

~~Stock-Based Compensation~~

~~The Company’s 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (see Note 10) provides for the grant of stock options, restricted stock and restricted stock unit awards.~~

The Company measures stock awards granted to employees and directors at fair value on the date of grant and recognizes the corresponding compensation expense of the awards, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service periods, which correspond to the vesting periods of the awards. The Company issues stock awards with only service-based vesting conditions, and records compensation expense for these awards using the straight-line method.

The Company uses the grant date fair market value of its common stock to value both employee and non-employee options when granted. The Company revalues non-employee options each reporting period using the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the last day of each reporting period.

~~Classification of Securities~~

~~The Company applies the principles of ASC 480-10 “Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity” and ASC 815-40 “Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts~~did not have any license revenues in Entity’s Own Equity” to determine whether financial instruments such as warrants should be classified as liabilities or equity and whether beneficial conversion features exist. Financial instruments such as warrants that are evaluated to be classified as liabilities are fair valued upon issuance and are remeasured at fair value at subsequent reporting periods with the resulting change in fair value recorded in other income/(expense). The fair value of warrants is estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton model and requires the input of subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility and expected life.

~~Income Taxes~~

The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the financial statements or in the Company’s tax returns. Deferred taxes are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect in the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. Changes in deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded in the provision for income taxes. The Company assesses the likelihood that its deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income and, to the extent it believes, based upon the weight of available evidence, that it is more likely than not that all or a portion of deferred tax assets will not be realized, a valuation allowance is established through a charge to income tax expense. Potential for recovery of deferred tax assets is evaluated by estimating the future taxable profits expected and considering prudent and feasible tax planning strategies.

The Company accounts for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial statements by applying a two-step process to determine the amount of tax benefit to be recognized. First, the tax position must be evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination by the taxing authorities. If the tax position is deemed more-likely-than-not to be sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The provision for income taxes includes the effects of any resulting tax reserves, or unrecognized tax benefits, that are considered appropriate, as well as the related net interest and penalties.

~~Comprehensive Loss~~

Comprehensive loss is defined as changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) exclusive of transactions with owners (such as capital contributions and distributions). There was no difference between net loss and comprehensive loss for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

~~Segment Data~~

~~Prior~~For all periods presented, the comprehensive income (loss) was equal to the ~~merger with Napo, the Company managed its operation as~~net income (loss); therefore, a ~~single segment for the purposes~~separate statement of ~~assessing performance and making operating decisions. The Company reorganized their segments to reflect the change~~comprehensive income (loss) is not included in the organizational structure resulting from the merger with Napo. Post-merger with Napo, the Company manages its operations through two segments. The Company has two reportable segments—human health and animal health. The animal health segment is focused on developing and commercializing prescription and non-prescription products for companion and production animals. The human health segment is focused on developing and commercializing of human products and the ongoing commercialization of Mytesi™, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the symptomatic relief of noninfectious diarrhea in adults with HIV/AIDS on antiretroviral therapy.

~~The Company’s reportable segments net sales and net income consisted of:~~

Three Months Ended March 31,

2018

2017

Revenue from external customers

Human Health

$
583,269

$
—

Animal Health

43,698

822,410

Consolidated Totals

$
626,967

$
822,410

Interest expense

Human Health

$
105,891

$
—

Animal Health

496,131

180,072

Consolidated Totals

$
602,022

$
180,072

Depreciation and amortization

Human Health

$
314,530

$
—

Animal Health

15,031

15,031

Consolidated Totals

$
329,561

$
15,031

Segment profit

Human Health

$
(2,899,306
)
$
—

Animal Health

(2,797,331
)
(4,715,358
)
Consolidated Totals

$
(5,696,637
)
$
(4,715,358
)

~~The Company’s reportable segments assets consisted of the following:~~

As of March 31,

As of December 31,

2018

2017

Segment assets

Human Health

$
41,520,244

$
41,754,603

Animal Health

50,982,480

36,807,184

Total

$
92,502,724

$
78,561,787

~~The reconciliation of segments assets to the consolidated assets is as follows:~~

As of March 31,

As of December 31,

2018

2017

Total assets for reportable segments

$
92,502,724

$
78,561,787

Less: investment in subsidiary

(29,240,965
)
(29,240,965
)
Less: Intercompany loan

(2,000,000
)
(2,000,000
)
Less: intercompany receivable

(10,994,417
)
(3,691,616
)
Consolidated Totals

$
50,267,342

$
43,629,206

~~Basic and Diluted Net Loss Per Common Share~~

Basic net loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss attributable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares, including potential dilutive shares of common stock assuming the dilutive effect of potential dilutive securities. For periods in which the Company reports a net loss, diluted net loss per common share is the same as basic net loss per common share, because their impact would be anti-dilutive to the calculation of net loss per common share. Diluted net loss per common share is the same as basic net loss per common share for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~

Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests with a Scope Exception” (“ASU 2017-11”), which addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. The amendments in Part I of this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-11 on itsaccompanying condensed consolidated financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~May 2017,~~June 2018, the FASB issued ASU ~~No. 2017-09, “Compensation—~~2018-07, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): ~~Scope of Modification Accounting” (“ASU 2017-09”), which provides guidance on determining which changes~~Improvements to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for (1) public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance andNonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting ~~for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets” (“ASU 2017-05”), which clarifies~~. This update expands the scope of ~~the nonfinancial asset guidance in Subtopic 610-20. This ASU also clarifies that the derecognition of all businesses~~Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and nonprofit activities (except those related to conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights or contracts with customers) should be accounted for in accordance with the derecognition and deconsolidation guidance in Subtopic 810-10.services from nonemployees. The amendments specify that Topic 718 applies to all share-based payment transactions in ~~this ASU also provide guidance on the accounting for what often are referred~~which a grantor acquires goods or services to ~~as partial sales of nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 and contributions of nonfinancial assets to~~be used or consumed in a ~~joint venture or other noncontrolled investee.~~grantor’s own operations by issuing share-based payment awards. The amendments ~~in this ASU are effective for annual reporting reports beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within~~also clarify that reporting period. Public entities may apply the guidance earlier but only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04 related to goodwill impairment testing. This ASU eliminates Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the new guidance, if a reporting unit’s carrying amount exceeds its fair value, the entity will record an impairment charge based on that difference. The impairment charge will be limited to the amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. Previously, if the fair value of a reporting unit was lower than its carrying amount (Step 1), an entity was required to calculate any impairment charge by comparing the implied fair value of goodwill with its carrying amount (Step 2). Additionally, under the new standard, entities that have reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts will no longer be required to perform the qualitative assessment to determine whether to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test. As a result, reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts will generally be expected to pass the simplified impairment test; however, additional disclosure will be required of those entities. This ASU will be effective beginning in the first quarter of our fiscal year 2020. Early adoption is permitted for annual and interim goodwill impairment testing dates after January 1, 2017. The new guidance must be adopted on a prospective basis. The Company early adopted this ASU in 2017. For impact of the adoption of this standard, refer to Note 6 “Goodwill”.

In November 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows: Restricted Cash, or ASU 2016-18, that will require entities to show the changes in the total of cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. As a result, entities will no longer present transfers between cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents in the statement of cash flows. When cash, cash equivalents, restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents are presented in more than one line item on the balance sheet, the new guidance requires a reconciliation of the totals in the statement of cash flows to the related captions in the balance sheet. This reconciliation can be presented either on the face of the statement of cash flows or in the notes to the financial statements. Entities will also have to disclose the nature of their restricted cash and restricted cash equivalent balances. ASU 2016-18 becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, with early adoption permitted. Any adjustments must be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-16, Accounting for Income Taxes: Intra-Entitiy Asset Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory. Under current GAAP, the tax effects of intra-entity asset transfers (intercompany sales) are deferred until the transferred asset is sold to a third party or otherwise recovered through use. This is an exception to the principle in ASC 740, Income Taxes, that generally requires comprehensive recognition of current and deferred income taxes. The new guidance eliminates the exception for all intra-entity sales of assets other than inventory. As a result, a reporting entity would recognize the tax expense from the sale of the asset in the seller’s tax jurisdiction when the transfer occurs, even though the pre-tax effects of that transaction are eliminated in consolidation. Any deferred tax asset that arises in the buyer’s jurisdiction would also be recognized at the time of the transfer. The new guidanceTopic 718 does not apply to intra-entity transfers of inventory. The ASU will be effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses the following cash flow issues:share-based payments used to effectively provide (1) ~~debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; (2) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation~~financing to the ~~effective interest rate~~issuer or (2) awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services to customers as part of ~~the borrowing; (3) contingent consideration payments made after~~ a business combination; (4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; (5) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; (6) distributions received from equity method investees; (7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and (8) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle.contract accounted for under ASC 606. The amendments in ~~this~~ ASU 2018-07 are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2017 and~~2018, including interim periods within ~~those~~that fiscal ~~years and are effective for all other entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.~~year. Early adoption is ~~permitted, including adoption in an interim period.~~permitted. The Company adopted this ~~guidance~~standard on January 1, ~~2018~~2019, and ~~such adoption~~this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s ~~condensed consolidated~~ financial ~~statements.~~position, results of operations or disclosures

In ~~March 2016~~August 2018, the FASB issued ASU ~~No. 2016-07, Investments—Equity Method~~2018-15, Intangible - Goodwill and ~~Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying~~Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40), which aligns the ~~Transition~~requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to the Equity Method of Accounting. This new standard eliminates the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interestdevelop or degree of influence, an adjustment must be made to the investment, results of operations and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment has been held. ASU 2016-07obtain internal-use software. ASU2018-15 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which provides guidance for accounting for leases. Under ASU 2016-02, the Company ~~will be required to recognize~~in the ~~assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leased assets. ASU 2016-02~~first quarter of 2020. Early adoption is ~~effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.~~permitted. ASU2018-15 permits either a prospective or retrospective transition approach. The Company is currently evaluating ASU2018-15 to determine the impact ~~of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our~~to its condensed consolidated financial ~~statements.~~statements and related disclosures.

In ~~May 2014,~~August 2018, the FASB issued ASU ~~No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic ~~606)” (ASU 2014-09),~~820). The new guidance modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements. ASU 2018-13 is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2020 and subsequently issued modifications or clarifications in ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,” ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” and ASU No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.” The revenue recognition principle in ASU 2014-09 and the related guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects tomust be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 prescribes a five-step process for evaluating contracts and determining revenue recognition. In addition, new and enhanced disclosures are required. Companies may adopt the new standard either using the full retrospective approach,adopted on a modified retrospective ~~approach~~basis, with ~~practical expedients, or a cumulative effect upon~~certain exceptions. Early adoption ~~approach.~~is permitted. The Company ~~has completed the process of evaluating the effects of the adoption of Topic 606 and determined that the timing and measurement of our revenues under the new standard is similar~~does not expect ASU 2018-13 to that recognized under the previous revenue guidance. Similar to the current guidance, the Company will need to make significant estimates related to variable consideration at the point of sale, including chargebacks, rebates and product returns. Revenue will be recognized at a point in time upon the transfer of control of the Company’s products, which occurs upon delivery for substantially all of the Company’s sales. The Company adopted the new revenue guidance effective January 1, 2018, by recognizing the cumulative effect of initially applying the new standard as an increase to the opening balance of retained earnings as prescribed by the modified retrospective method of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2014-09, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12 did not have a ~~material~~significant impact ~~on Company’s~~to its condensed consolidated financial ~~statements.~~

~~3. Business Combination~~statements and related disclosures.

As discussed in Note 1—Organization and Business, the Company completed a merger with Napo on July 31, 2017. Napo now operates as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jaguar focused on human health and the ongoing commercialization of Mytesi, a Napo drug product approved by the U.S. FDA for the symptomatic relief of noninfectious diarrhea in adults with HIV/AIDS on antiretroviral therapy.

The merger was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations and Jaguar was considered to be the acquiring company. Under the acquisition method of accounting, total consideration exchanged was:

(Unaudited)

Fair value of Jaguar common stock

$
25,303,859

Fair value of Jaguar common stock warrants

630,859

Fair value of replacement restricted stock units

3,300,555

Fair value of replacement stock options

5,691

Cash

2,000,000

Effective settlement of receivable from Napo

464,295

Total consideration exchanged

$
31,705,259

~~The purchase price allocation to assets and liabilities assumed in the transaction was:~~

Current assets

$
2,578,114

Non-current assets

396,247

Identifiable intangible assets

36,400,000

Current liabilities

(4,052,180
)
Convertible notes payable

(12,473,501
)
Deferred tax liability

(13,181,242
)
Net assets acquired

9,667,438

Goodwill on acquisition

22,037,821

Total consideration

$
31,705,259

Under the acquisition method of accounting, certain identifiable assets and liabilities of Napo including identifiable intangible assets, inventory, debt and deferred revenue were recorded based on their estimated fair values as of the effective time of the Napo Merger. Tangible and other assets and liabilities were valued at their respective carrying amounts, which management believes approximate their fair values.

The Developed Technology (DT) is for the development and commercial processing of Mytesi™ (crofelemer 125mg delayed-release tablets), which is an antidiarrheal indicated for the symptomatic relief of noninfectious diarrhea in adult patients with HIV/AIDS on antiretroviral therapy. The DT is a definite lived asset and is being amortized over a 15-year estimated useful life.

The acquired trademarks include Mytesi product trademark, domain names, and other brand related intellectual property. Trademark is a definite lived asset and is being amortized over a 15-year estimated useful life.

The acquired IPR&D projects relate to developing the proprietary technology into a commercially viable product for the several follow-on indications related to formulations of crofelemer. Crofelemer is in development for rare disease indications for infants and children with congenital diarrheal disorders (CDD) and short bowel syndrome (SBS), and for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). These indications have completed some studies of clinical testing for safety and/or proof of concept efficacy at the time of the merger and the projects were determined to have substance. IPR&D is not amortized during the development period and is tested for impairment at least annually, or more frequently if indicators of impairment are identified. The Company terminated development of the indication for C. difficile infection (CDI) in Q4 2017. This indication was included as part of IPR&D at the time of the merger, and an impairment loss of $2,300,000 was recorded as a result of the decision to abandon the project in favor of the prioritization of the following: Mytesi is in development for follow-on indications in cancer therapy-related diarrhea (CTD), an important supportive care indication for patients undergoing primary or adjuvant therapy for cancer treatment; as supportive care for post-surgical inflammatory bowel disease patients (IBD); and as a second-generation anti-secretory agent for use in cholera patients. These indications did not have substance at the time of the merger and were not recognized as an asset apart from Goodwill.

~~The fair value of IPR&D, trademark, and DT was determined using the income approach, which was based on forecasts prepared by management.~~

The Napo Merger resulted in $22,037,821 of goodwill relating principally to synergies expected to be achieved from the combined operations and planned growth in new markets. Goodwill has been allocated to the human health segment.

As none of the goodwill, IPR&D, and developed technology acquired are expected to be deductible for income tax purposes, it was determined that a deferred income tax liability of $14,498,120 was required to reflect the book to tax differences of the merger. A deferred tax asset of $1,316,878 was accounted as an element of consideration for the replacement share-based payment awards as the replacement awards are expected to result in a future tax deduction.

~~The Company valued finished goods using a net realizable value approach, which resulted in a step-up of $84,806. Raw material was valued using the replacement cost approach.~~

The Company valued convertible debt assumed in the Napo Merger based on the value of the debt and the conversion option at $12,473,501 (see note 8). The Company incurred total acquisition related costs of $3,554,250. The acquisition related costs includes the fair value of $151,351 for 270,270 shares of Company’s common stock issued to a former creditor of Napo towards reimbursement of acquisition related costs. Acquisition related costs were expensed as incurred to general and administrative expenses in the condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

~~The following table provides unaudited proforma results, prepared in accordance with ASC 805, for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, as if Napo was acquired on January 1, 2016.~~

For the Three Months Ended March 31,

2018

2017

Net sales

804,356

1,340,544

Net loss

(5,696,637
)
(7,647,024
)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted

(0.04
)
(0.54
)

The unaudited proforma results include adjustments to eliminate the interest on Napo’s historical convertible debt not assumed by Jaguar and debt exchanged for Jaguar common stock, record interest on convertible debt assumed by Jaguar, eliminate Napo impairment of investment in related party, and eliminate Napo’s loss from investment in related party. The Company made proforma adjustments to exclude the acquisition related costs for the three months ended March 31, 2017 because such costs are nonrecurring and are directly related to the Napo Merger.

The unaudited pro forma condensed results do not give effect to the potential impact of current financial conditions, regulatory matters, operating efficiencies or other savings or expenses that may be associated with the Napo Merger.The Company made proforma adjustments to exclude the acquisition related costs for the three months ended March 31, 2017. Unaudited pro forma amounts are not necessarily indicative of results had the Napo Merger occurred on January 1, 2016 or of future results.

4.3. Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements,” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. Fair value is defined under ASC 820 as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market

Table of Contents

participants on the measurement date. Valuation techniques used to measure fair value under ASC 820 must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. The standard describes a fair value hierarchy based on three levels of inputs, of which the first two are considered observable and the last unobservable, that may be used to measure fair value which are the following:

Level 1— Observable inputs such as quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2— Observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, or model derived valuations whose significant inputs are observable.

Level 3— Unobservable inputs that reflect the reporting entity’s own assumptions.

· ~~Level 1—Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;~~

· Level 2—Inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data; and

· ~~Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to~~The following tables set forth the fair value of the ~~assets or liabilities, including pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies and similar techniques.~~

~~The following table presents information about the~~ Company’s ~~derivative, conversion option and warrant liabilities~~financial instruments that were measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017 and indicates the fair value hierarchy of the valuation:~~2018.


		March 31, 2019
	(unaudited)
		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Warrant liability		$	—	$	—	$	1,275,443	$	1,275,443
Total fair value		$	—	$	—	$	1,275,443	$	1,275,443

March 31, 2018

Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Warrant liability

$
—

$
—

$
192,960

$
192,960

Derivative liability

—

—

15,000

15,000

Conversion option liability

—

—

—

—

Total fair value

$
—

$
—

$
207,960

$
207,960


	December 31, 2017								December 31, 2018
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3			Total
Warrant liability	$	—	$	—	$	103,860	$	103,860	$	—	$	—	$	220,376	��	$	220,376
Derivative liability	—		—		11,000		11,000
Conversion option liability	—		—		111,841		111,841
Total fair value	$	—	$	—	$	226,701	$	226,701	$	—	$	—	$	220,376		$	220,376

The change in the estimated fair value of ~~level~~Level 3 liabilities is summarized below:

For The Three Months Ended

March 31, 2018

March 31, 2017

Warrant

Derivative

Conversion Option

Warrant

liability

Liability

Liability

liability

Beginning fair value of level 3 liability

$
103,860

$
11,000

$
111,841

$
799,201

Extinguishment

—

—

(286,595
)
—

Change in fair value of level 3 liability

89,100

4,000

174,754

453,419

Ending fair value of level 3 liability

$
192,960

$
15,000

$
—

$
1,252,620


	Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2019
	Warrant
	Liability
		(unaudited)
Beginning fair value of Level 3 liability	$	220,376
Additions		1,009,010
Extinguishment		—
Change in fair value		46,057
Ending fair value of Level 3 liability	$	1,275,443

Warrant Liability

The warrants associated with the ~~level~~Level 3 warrant liability were ~~issued~~the November 2016 Series A Warrants, the October 2018 Underwriter Warrants, the Notes Payable warrants and the LOC warrant, which at March 31, 2019 were valued at $10,994, $274,018, $874,134, and $116,297 respectively in ~~2016 and were originally valued on November 29, 2016 using~~ the ~~Black-Scholes-Merton model~~Company’s consolidated balance sheet. At December 31, 2018, the warrants associated with the ~~following assumptions: stock price~~Level 3 warrant liability were the November 2016 Series A Warrants, the October 2018 Underwriter Warrants, which were valued at $7,388 and $212,988, respectively in the Company’s consolidated balance sheet.

The Series A warrant valuation of ~~$0.69, exercise price of $0.75, term of 5.5 years expiring May 2022, volatility of 71.92%, dividend yield of 0%, and risk-free interest rate of 1.87%. The $103,860 valuation~~$7,388 at December 31, 2017 was computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model using a stock price of $0.1398, the strike price was $0.75 per share, the expected life was 4.41 years, the volatility was 96.36% and the risk free rate was 2.14%. The $192,960 valuation at March 31, 2018 was computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model using a stock price of ~~$0.195, the~~$0.23, a strike price ~~was $0.75~~of $11.25 per share, ~~the~~an expected ~~life was 4.16~~term of 3.41 years, ~~the~~ volatility ~~was 109.62%~~of 135.63% and ~~the risk free~~a risk-free discount rate ~~was 2.49%~~of 2.46%. The ~~resulting $89,100 loss is included in change in fair value~~Series A warrant valuation of ~~warrants in the statement of income and comprehensive loss.~~

~~Derivative Liability~~

The derivative liability associated with the level 3 liability were associated with the June 2017 issuance of a convertible note payable. The Company computed fair values at the date of issuance of $15,000 and $5,000 for the repayment and the interest rate increase feature, respectively, using the Binomial Lattice Model, which was based on the generalized binomial option pricing formula. The $20,000 combined fair value was carved out and is included as a derivative liability on the Balance Sheet. The derviatives were revalued at December 31, 2017 using the same Model resulting in a combined fair value of $11,000. The resulting $9,000 gain is included in other income and expense in the Company’s statement of income and comprehensive loss. The derviatives were revalued again$10,994 at March 31, 2018 using the same Model resulting in a combined fair value of $15,000. The resulting $4,000 loss is included in other income and expense in the Company’s statement of income and comprehensive loss.

~~Conversion Option Liability~~

In March 2017, Napo entered into an exchangeable note purchase agreement with two lenders for the funding of face amount of $1,312,500 in two $525,000 tranches of face amount $656,250. The Company assumed the notes at fair value of $1,312,500 as part of the Napo Merger. In December 2017, Napo amended the exchangeable note purchase agreement to extend the maturity of the first tranche and second tranche of notes to February 15, 2018 and April 1, 2018, respectively, increase the principal amount by 12%, and reduce the conversion price from $0.56 per share to $0.20 per share. The Company also issued 2,492,084 shares of common stock to the lenders in connection with this amendment to partially redeem $299,050 from the first tranche of the notes. The optional conversion option in the notes2019 was ~~bifurcated and accounted as a derivative liability at its fair value of $111,841~~computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model ~~and the following criteria:~~using a stock price of ~~$0.14~~$0.28, a strike price of $11.25 per share, ~~conversion prices~~an expected term of ~~$0.20 per share, expected life of 0.13 to 0.25~~3.16 years, volatility of ~~86.29% to 160.78%, risk free~~145.72% and a risk-free discount rate of ~~1.28% to 1.39% and dividend rate~~2.21%.The net change in the fair

Table of ~~0%. The $111,841 was included in conversion option liability on the balance sheet and in loss on extinguishment of debt on the statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The fair~~ Contents

value of the ~~conversion option liability was again revalued at~~warrants of $3,606 for the three months ended March 23, 2018 using the Black-Scholes-Merton model using the following criteria: stock price of $0.21 per share, expected life of 0.11 years, volatility of 288.16%, risk free rate of 1.69% and dividend rate of 0%, resulting in an increase of $174,754 to the fair value of the conversion option liability and included31, 2019 is recorded in the change in fair value of warrants, derivative liability and conversion option liability in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The underlying debt was paid off in March of 2018 and the $286,595 conversion option liability was written off to other income in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

~~5. Related Party Transactions~~

~~Due from former parent~~

The ~~Company~~October 2018 Underwriter Warrants valuation of $212,988 at December 31, 2018 was computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model using a ~~majority-owned subsidiary~~stock price of ~~Napo until May 18, 2015, the date~~$0.23, a strike price of ~~the Company’s IPO. Additionally, Lisa A. Conte, Chief Executive Officer~~$0.75 per share, an expected term of ~~the Company, was also the Interim Chief Executive Officer~~4.76 years, volatility of ~~Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.~~135.63% and a risk free discount rate of 2.51%. The ~~Company completed a merger with Napo on July 31, 2017, from which date Napo operates as a wholly-owned subsidiary~~October 2018 Underwriter Warrants valuation of ~~the Company—see Note 3—Business Combination.~~

~~The Company has total outstanding receivables (payables) from Napo~~$274,018 at March 31, ~~2017 as follows:~~

March 31,

2017

Due from former parent

$
221,429

Royalty payable to former parent

(7
)
Net receivable (payable) to former parent

$
221,422

~~Due from former parent~~

~~Employee leasing~~2019 was computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model using a stock price of $0.28, a strike price of $0.75 per share, an expected term of 4.51 years, volatility of 145.72% and ~~overhead allocation~~

~~Effective July 1, 2016, Napo agreed to reimburse~~a risk-free discount rate of 2.23%. The net change in the ~~Company for the use~~fair value of the ~~Company’s employee’s time and related expenses, including rent and a fixed overhead amount to cover office supplies and copier use. The balance~~warrants of ~~unpaid employee leasing charges due from Napo was $277,529 at December 31, 2016. The total amount of such services was $407,267 and Napo remitted $465,625~~$61,030 for the three months ended March 31, ~~2017. The remaining unpaid balance of $219,171~~2019 is ~~included in due from former~~ ~~parent in current assets on the Company’s balance sheet, and the receivable from Napo was effectively settled on merger and is included~~recorded in the ~~purchase consideration for~~change in fair value of warrants, derivative liability and conversion option liability in the ~~acquisition~~consolidated statements of ~~Napo.~~

~~Loan to Napo~~

operations

The ~~Company loaned $2.0 million from proceeds~~Note Payable Warrants were issued in March 2019 with an initial valuation of ~~shares issued to~~$892,713, computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model using a stock price of $0.47, a strike price of $0.47 per share, an ~~investor~~expected term of 5.0 years, volatility of 145.72% and a risk free discount rate of 2.42%. The Note Payable Warrants valuation of $874,134 at March 31, 2019 was computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model using a stock price of $0.28, a strike price of $0.47 per share, an expected term of 5.0 years, volatility of 145.72% and a risk-free discount rate of 2.23%. The net change in ~~connection with~~ the ~~merger to Napo, to partially extinguish Napo’s debt. The Company accounted~~fair value of the warrants of $18,579 for ~~this amount as purchase consideration for the acquisition of Napo.~~

~~Other transactions~~

The Company periodically makes purchases on behalf of Napo, primarily including travel expenses and investor relations expenses. The balance of unpaid non-employee leasing charges due from Napo was $22,290 at December 31, 2016. The total amount of such purchases was $5,376 and Napo remitted $25,408 in the three months ended March 31, ~~2017. The remaining unpaid balance of $2,258~~2019 is ~~included in due from former parent in current assets on the Company’s balance sheet, and the receivable from Napo was effectively settled on merger and is included~~recorded in the ~~purchase consideration for the acquisition~~change in fair value of ~~Napo.~~

~~Royalty payable to former parent~~warrants, derivative liability and ~~license fee payable to former parent and related agreement~~

~~On July 11, 2013, Jaguar entered into an~~conversion option to license Napo’s intellectual property and technology (the “Option Agreement”). Under the Option Agreement, upon the payment of $100,000 in July 2013, the Company obtained an option for a period of two years to execute an exclusive worldwide license to Napo’s intellectual property and technology to use for the Company’s animal health business. The option price was creditable against future license fees to be paid to Napo under the License Agreement (as defined below).

In January 2014, the Company exercised its option and entered into a license agreement (the “License Agreement”) with Napo for an exclusive worldwide license to Napo’s intellectual property and technology to permit the Company to develop, formulate, manufacture, market, use, offer for sale, sell, import, export, commercialize and distribute products for veterinary treatment uses and indications for all species of animals. The Company was originally obligated to pay a one-time non-refundable license fee of $2,000,000, less the option fee of $100,000. At the Company’s option, the license fee could have been paid in common stock. In January 2015, the License Agreement was amended to decrease the one-time non-refundable license fee payable from $2,000,000 to $1,750,000 in exchange for acceleration of the payment of the fee. Given that Napo was a significant shareholder of the Company, the abatement of the license fee amount was recorded as a capital contributionliability in the ~~accompanying condensed financial statements. The Company paid the final $425,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2016.~~

~~Milestone payments aggregating $3,150,000 were also potentially due to Napo based on regulatory approvals~~consolidated statements of ~~various veterinary products. In addition to the milestone payments, the Company would owe Napo an 8% royalty on annual net sales of products derived from the~~ ~~Croton lechleri~~ tree, up to $30,000,000 and then, a royalty of 10% on annual net sales of $30,000,000 or more. Additionally, if any other products are developed, the Company would owe Napo a 2% royalty on annual net sales of pharmaceutical prescription products that are not derived from ~~Croton lechleri~~ ~~and a 1% royalty on annual net sales of non-prescription products that are not derived from~~ ~~Croton lechleri~~. The royalty term expires at the longer of 10 years from the first sale of each individual product or when there is no longer a valid patent claim covering any of the products and a competitive product has entered the market. However, because an IPO of at least $10,000,000 was consummated prior to December 31, 2015, the royalty was reduced to 2% of annual net sales of its prescription products derived from ~~Croton lechleri~~ ~~and 1% of net sales of its non-prescription products derived from~~ ~~Croton lechleri~~ ~~and no milestone payment will be due and no royalties will be owed on any additional products developed.~~

operations.

The ~~Company had unpaid royalties of $171~~LOC Warrants were issued on March 29, 2019 with a valuation at December 31, 2016, which are netted with other receivables due from former parent in current assets in the Company’s balance sheet. The Company incurred $284 in royalties in the three months ended March 31, 2017, which are included in salesissuance and marketing expense in the Company’s statement of operations and comprehensive loss, and paid $447 to Napo in the three months ended March 31, 2017. The remaining balance of unpaid royalties of $7 are netted with other receivables due from the former parent and are included in current assets in the Company’s balance sheet. The Company may, at its sole discretion, elect to remit any milestone payments and/or royalties in the form of the Company’s common stock.

~~6. Balance Sheet Components~~

~~Land, Property and Equipment~~

~~Land, property and equipment~~ at March 31, ~~2018~~2019 of $116,297, computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model using a stock price of $0.28, a strike price of $0.25 per share, an expected term of 5.0 years, volatility of 145.72% and ~~December 31, 2017 consisted~~a risk-free discount rate of ~~the following:~~2.23%.

March 31,

December 31,

2018

2017

Land

$
396,247

$
396,247

Lab equipment

811,087

811,087

Clinical equipment

64,870

64,870

Software

62,637

62,637

Furniture and fixtures

6,527

—

Total property and equipment at cost

1,341,368

1,334,841

Accumulated depreciation

(127,804
)
(112,773
)
Property and equipment, net

$
1,213,564

$
1,222,068

~~Depreciation and amortization expense was $15,031 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 and was included in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss as follows:~~4. Balance Sheet Components

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

Depreciation - lab equipment - research and development expense

$
6,568

$
6,568

Depreciation - clinical equipment - research and development expense

3,243

3,243

Depreciation - software - general and administrative expense

5,220

5,220

Total depreciation expense

$
15,031

$
15,031

Goodwill

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill at March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 was as follows:


						March 31,		December 31,
	March 31,		December 31,			2019		2018
	2018		2017			(unaudited)
Beginning balance	$	5,210,821	$	—		$	—	$	5,210,821
Goodwill acquired in conjunction with the Napo merger	—		22,037,821
Impairment	—		(16,827,000		)		—		(5,210,821)
Ending balance	5,210,821		5,210,821			$	—	$	—

Table of Contents

Intangible assets

Intangible assets at March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 consisted of the following:


							March 31,		December 31,
	March 31,			December 31,			2019		2018
	2018			2017				(unaudited)
Developed technology	$	25,000,000		$	25,000,000		$	25,000,000	$	25,000,000
Accumulated developed technology amortization	(1,111,112		)	(694,445		)		(2,777,778)		(2,361,111)
Developed technology, net	23,888,888			24,305,555				22,222,222		22,638,889
In process research and development	11,100,000			11,100,000				8,800,000		8,800,000
Impairment	(2,300,000		)	(2,300,000		)
	8,800,000			8,800,000
Trademarks	300,000			300,000				300,000		300,000
Accumulated trademark amortization	(13,333		)	(8,333		)		(33,333)		(28,333)
Trademarks, net	286,667			291,667				266,667		271,667
Total intangible assets, net	$	32,975,555		$	33,397,222		$	31,288,889	$	31,710,556

Amortization expense was $421,667 ~~and $0~~ in the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~2018.

~~Accrued Expenses~~The following table summarizes the Company’s estimated future amortization expense of intangible assets with finite lives as of March 31, 2019:


		Amounts
2020		$ 1,265,000
2021		1,686,667
2022		1,686,667
2023		1,686,667
2024		1,686,667
Thereafter		14,477,221
		$ 22,488,889

~~Accrued expenses~~

5. Related Party Transactions

Management Services Agreement

In March 2018, concurrent with the issuance of the Company’s Series A convertible participating preferred stock to Sagard Capital Partners, the Company entered into a Management Services Agreement with Sagard Capital Partners. Under the agreement, Sagard Partners will provide consulting and management advisory service to the Company from March 2018 through March 2021. These services include assistance with strategic planning regarding the Company’s commercial strategy, research and due diligence regarding human resource activities, and strategic advice in financial matters. In consideration for such services, the Company will pay Sagard Capital Partners an annual fee of $450,000, with total fees over the term of the agreement not to exceed $1,350,000.

Letter of Credit

To satisfy the letter of credit requirement in the Company’s new office lease agreement, Pacific Capital Management, LLC, one of the Company’s existing shareholders, caused its financial institution to issue a letter of credit in the amount of $475,000 on behalf of the Company, dated August 28, 2018. In consideration of the letter of credit, in August 2018 the Company issued to Capital Management, LLC a warrant to purchase 670,586 shares of the Company’s voting common stock. The warrant is exercisable on or after March 28, 2019 at ~~March 31,~~an exercise price of $0.70 per common

Table of Contents

share and has a five year term. The $493,688 fair value of the Warrant was classified in the statement of stockholders’ equity (see Note 6).

6. Commitments and Contingencies

On August 28, 2018, the Company entered into an office lease extension agreement for approximately 6,311 square feet of office space in San Francisco, CA. The term of the Lease began on September 1, 2018 and ~~December 31, 2017 consist~~will expire on September 30, 2020, unless earlier terminated in accordance therewith. The monthly base rent under the Lease is as follows: $38,392 for the first twelve months, $39,544 for the subsequent twelve months, and $40,730 for the final month. The Company will also pay an additional monthly amount for the Company’s proportionate share of the ~~following:~~

March 31,

December 31,

2018

2017

Accrued compensation and related:

Accrued vacation

$
287,522

$
264,304

Accrued payroll

1,150

150

Accrued payroll tax

28,016

30,617

316,688

295,071

Accrued interest

342,498

659,961

Accrued research and development costs

668,850

668,850

Accrued audit

6,250

40,000

Accrued other

329,948

535,667

Total

$
1,664,234

$
2,199,549

~~7. Commitments~~building’s operating charges. An existing shareholder provided a standby letter of credit in the amount of $475,000 to the Lessor as collateral for the full performance by the Company of all of its obligations under the Lease. In consideration of the Letter of Credit, the Company issued the existing shareholder a five-year warrant to purchase 670,586 shares of the Company’s voting common stock (see Note 5). The Warrant is exercisable on or after March 28, 2019 at an exercise price of $0.70 per share. The fair value of the warrant was determined to be $493,688 using the Black-Scholes-Merton model with the following criteria: stock price of $0.84 per share, expected life of 5 years, volatility of 132%, risk-free rate of 2.77% and ~~Contingencies~~dividend rate of 0%. The $493,688 fair value of the Warrant was classified in the statement of stockholders’ equity with an offset to deferred rent. Each month, $19,748 of this rent will be recognized as non-cash rent expense.

~~Effective July 1, 2015,~~In December 2018, the Company ~~leases its San Francisco, California headquarters under~~did not meet a ~~non-cancelable sub-lease agreement that expires August 31, 2018. The Company provided cash deposits of $122,163, consisting of a security deposit of $29,539 and prepayment~~covenant per the terms of the ~~last three months~~$475,000 Letter of Credit, the ~~lease~~result of ~~$92,623,~~ which ~~are included~~required the Company to issue a Letter of Credit of $122,000 to the shareholder who issued the original $475,000 letter of credit. In March 2019, the Company canceled the $122,000 letter of credit in ~~prepaid expenses and other current assets on~~lieu of issuing the ~~Company’s balance sheet.~~

~~Future minimum lease payments under non-cancelable operating leases~~shareholder a promissory note for that amount in April 2019, as ~~of December 31, 2017 are~~well as ~~follows:~~issuing the shareholder a warrant (see Note 7).

Years ending December 31,

Amount

2018

$
153,705

Total minimum lease payments

$
153,705

The Company recognizes ~~rent~~lease expense on a straight-line basis over the non-cancelable lease period. ~~Rent~~Lease expense ~~under the non-cancelable operating lease~~ was $171,750 and $90,278 for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017, respectively. Rent~~2018. Lease expense is included in general and administrative expense in the statements of ~~operations and comprehensive loss.~~operations.

Asset transfer and transition commitment

update

On September 25, 2017, Napo entered into the Termination, Asset Transfer and Transition Agreement dated September 22, 2017 with Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. (“Glenmark”). As a result of the agreement, Napo now controls commercial rights for Mytesi® for all indications, territories and patient populations globally, and also holds commercial rights to the existing regulatory approvals for crofelemer in Brazil, Ecuador, Zimbabwe and Botswana. In exchange, Napo agrees to pay Glenmark 25% of any payment it receives from a third party to whom Napo grants a license or sublicense or with whom Napo partners in respect of, or sells or otherwise transfers any of the transferred assets, subject to certain exclusions, until Glenmark has received a total of $7$7.0 million. No payments have been made to date.

Revenue sharing commitment

update

On December 14, 2017, the Company announced its entry into a collaboration agreement with Seed Mena Businessmen Services LLC (“SEED”) for Equilevia™, the ~~Company’s~~Company's non-prescription, personalized, premium product for total gut health in equine athletes. According to the terms of the Agreement, the Company will pay SEED 15% of total revenue generated from any clients or partners introduced to the Company by SEED in the form of fees, commissions, payments or revenue received by the Company or its business associates or partners, and the agreed-upon revenue percentage increases to 20% after the first million dollars of revenue. In return, SEED will provide the Company access to its existing UAE (“United Arab Emirates”) network and contacts and assist the Company with any legal or financial requirements. The agreement became effective on December 13, 2017 and will continue indefinitely until terminated by either party pursuant to the terms of the Agreement. Upon termination for any reason, the Company remains obligated to make Revenue Sharing Payments to SEED until the end of 2018. No payments have been made to date.

Table of Contents

Commitment to purchase Bridge Notes

Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. has committed to purchase short-term notes payable in the amount of $500,000. As of March 31, 2019, no notes payable have been issued to Sagard.

Purchase Commitment

As of March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had ~~issued non-cancelable~~no material purchase orders to ~~a vendor for $1.3 million.~~vendors.

~~Debt Obligations~~

~~See Note 8—Debt and Warrants.~~

Legal Proceedings

On July 20, 2017, a putative class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Civil Action No. 3:~~17-cv-04102,~~17‑cv‑04102, by Tony Plant (the “Plaintiff”) on behalf of shareholders of the Company who held shares on ~~June 30,~~April 12, 2017 and were entitled to vote at the 2017 Special Shareholders Meeting, against the Company and certain individuals who were directors as of the date of the vote (collectively, the “Defendants”), in a matter captioned Tony Plant v. Jaguar Animal Health, Inc., et al., making claims arising under Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule ~~14a-9,~~14a‑9, 17 C.F.R. § ~~240.14a-9,~~240.14a‑9, promulgated thereunder by the SEC. The claims ~~allege~~alleged false and misleading information provided to investors in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus on Form ~~S-4~~S‑4 (File No. ~~333-217364)~~333‑217364) declared effective by the Commission on July 6, 2017 related to the solicitation of votes from shareholders to approve the merger and certain transactions related thereto. The Company accepted service of the complaint and summons on behalf of itself and the United States-based director Defendants on November 1, 2017. The Company has not accepted service on behalf of, and Plaintiff has not yet served, the non-U.S.-based director Defendants. On October 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking appointment as lead plaintiff and appointment of Monteverde & Associates PC as lead counsel. That motion ~~has been~~was granted. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint against the Company and the United States-based director Defendants on January 10, 2018. The Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on March 12, 2018, for which oral arguments were held on June 14, 2018. The court dismissed the amended complaint on September 20, 2018. Plaintiff was entitled to amend that complaint within 20 days from the date of dismissal. On October 10, 2018, Plaintiff amended the amended complaint to focus on the Company’s commercial strategy in support of Equilevia and the related disclosure statements in the Form S-4 described above. On November 6, 2018, the Defendants moved to dismiss the second amended complaint. The Defendants argue in their motion that the second amended complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because the omissions and misrepresentations alleged in the complaint are immaterial as a matter of law. The motion has been fully briefed and is pending decision by the court. If the Plaintiff were able to prove ~~its~~his allegations in this matter and to establish the damages ithe asserts, then an adverse ruling could have a material impact on the Company. However, the Company disputes the claims asserted in this putative class action case and is vigorously contesting the matter. On March 12, 2018, the Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Company believes that it is not probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred as of the date of the financial statements and the amount of any potential loss is not reasonably estimable. ~~The court has ordered a briefing schedule on the motion to dismiss and has tentatively set a hearing date of June 14, 2018.~~

Other than as described above, there are currently no claims or actions pending against us, the ultimate disposition of which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Contingencies

From time to time, the Company may be involved in legal proceedings (other than those noted above) arising in the ordinary course of business. The Company believes there is no litigation pending that could have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Table of Contents

7. Debt and Warrants

Convertible Notes

Convertible notes at March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017~~2018 consist of the following:

March 31,

December 31,

2018

2017

February 2015 convertible notes payable

150,000

150,000

June 2017 convertible note payable

683,585

1,613,089

Napo convertible notes

10,875,300

12,153,389

$
11,708,885

$
13,916,478

Less: unamortized debt discount and debt issuance costs

(142,902
)
(261,826
)
Net convertible notes payable obligation

$
11,565,983

$
13,654,652

Convertible notes payable - non-current

10,875,300

10,982,437

Convertible notes payable - current

$
690,683

$
2,672,215

~~Interest expense on the convertible notes for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 follows:~~

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

February 2015 convertible note nominal interest

$
4,438

$
4,438

June 2017 convertible note nominal interest

18,864

—

June 2017 convertible note accretion of debt discount

118,923

—

Napo convertibles note nominal interest

87,828

—

Total interest expense on convertible debt

$
230,053

$
4,438


	March 31,		December 31,
	2019		2018
		(unaudited)
June 2017 convertible debt		$ 740,882		$ 740,882
Napo convertible debt		10,446,751		10,553,888
		11,187,633		11,294,770
Less: unamortized debt discount and debt issuance costs		(37,689)		(55,600)
Net convertible debt obligation	$	11,149,944	$	11,239,170
Convertible debt - non-current, net of discount		—		—
Convertible debt - current, net of discount	$	11,149,944	$	11,239,170

~~Interest expense is classified as such in the statements of operations and comprehensive income.~~

February 2015 Convertible Note

In February 2015, the Company issued a convertible promissory ~~notes~~note to ~~two~~an accredited ~~investors~~investor in the aggregate principal amount of ~~$250,000. These notes were~~$150,000. This note was issued pursuant to the convertible note purchase agreement dated December 23, 2014. In connection with the issuance of the notes, the Company issued the lenders warrants to purchase 22,320 shares at $5.60 per share, which expire December 31, 2017. Principal and interest of $103,912 was paid in May 2015 for $100,000 of these notes. The Company analyzed the beneficial nature of the conversion terms and determined that a BCF existed because the effective conversion price was less than the fair value at the time of the issuance. The Company calculated the value of the BCF using the intrinsic method. A BCF for the full face value was recorded as a discount to the notes payable and to additional paid-in capital. The full amount of the BCF was amortized to interest expense by the end of June 2015.

The remaining outstanding note of $150,000 is payable to an investor at an effective simple interest rate of 12% per annum, and was due in full on July 31, 2016. On July 28, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment to delay the repayment of the principal and related interest under the terms of the remaining note from July 31, 2016 to October 31, 2016.

On November 8, 2016, the Company entered into an amendment to extend the maturity date of the remaining note from October 31, 2016 to January 1, 2017. In exchange for the extension of the maturity date, on November 8, 2016, the Company’s board of directors granted the lender a warrant to purchase 120,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $0.01 per share. The warrant is exercisable at any time on or before July 28, 2022, the expiration date of the warrant. The amendment and related warrant issuance resulted in the Company treating the debt as having been extinguished and replaced with new debt for accounting purposes due to meeting the 10% cash flow test.

* Extinguishment of debt

On January 31, 2017, the Company entered into another amendment to extend the maturity date of the remaining note from January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2018. In exchange for the extension of the maturity date, on January 31, 2017, the Company’s board of directors granted the lender a warrant to purchase 370,916 shares of the Company’s common stock for $0.51 per share. The warrant is exercisable at any time on or before January 31, 2019, the expiration date of the warrant. The amendment and related warrant issuance resulted in the Company treating the debt as having been extinguished and replaced with new debt for accounting purposes due to meeting the 10% cash flow test. The Company calculated a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $207,713, or the equivalent to the fair value of the warrants granted, which is included in loss on extinguishment of debt in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss in the year ended December 31, 2017. In March of 2018, the debtor agreed to accept 135,605 shares of the Company’s common stock as payment for all outstanding principal and ~~interest. And in April of 2018, the Company issued 2,034,082 shares of common stock to pay off the principal and~~ interest ~~balance.~~

The $150,000 note is included in convertible notes payable on the balance sheet. The Company has unpaid accrued interest of $56,367 and $38,367, which is included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet as of March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and incurred interest expense of $4,438 in the ~~three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 which are included in interest expense in the statement~~amount of ~~operations and comprehensive loss.~~$203,408.

June 2017 Convertible Note

On June 29, 2017, the Company issued a secured convertible ~~promisorry~~promissory note to ~~a lendor~~Chicago Venture Partners, L.P. (“CVP”) in the aggregate principal amount of $2,155,000 less an original issue discount of $425,000 and less $30,000 to cover the ~~lender’s~~lender's legal fees for net cash proceeds of $1,700,000. Interest on the outstanding balance will be paid 8% per annum from the purchase price date until the balance is paid in full. All interest calculations are computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve (12) thirty (30) day months compounded daily and payable in accordance with the terms of the Note. All principal and interest on the debt is due in full on August 2, 2018. The Company accrued interest of $4,548 and $6,180 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, which is included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet, and incurred nominal interest of $18,864 in interest expense in the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company accreted debt discount of $118,923 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The lender has the right to convert all or any portion of the outstanding balance into the Company’s common stock at $1.00 per share. The Note provides the lender with an optional monthly redemption that allows for the monthly payment of up to $350,000 at the creditor’s option.

The Note provides for two separate features that result in a derivative liability:

Repayment of mandatory default amount upon an event of default—upon the occurrence of any event of default, the lender may accelerate the Note resulting in the outstanding balance becoming immediately due and payable in cash; and

Automatic increase in the interest rate on and during an event of default—during an event of default, the interest rate will increase to the lesser of 17% per annum or the maximum rate permitted under applicable law.

1. Repayment of mandatory default amount upon an event of default—upon the occurrence of any event of default, the lendor may accelerate the Note resulting in the outstanding balance becoming immediately due and payable in cash; and

2. Automatic increase in the interest rate on and during an event of default—during an event of default, the interest rate will increase to the lesser of 17% per annum or the maximum rate permitted under applicable law.

The Company computed fair values at ~~June 30, 2017~~the date of issuance of $15,000 and $5,000 for the repayment and the interest rate increase feature, respectively, using the Binomial Lattice Model, which was based on the generalized binomial option pricing formula. The $20,000 combined fair value was carved out and iswas included as a derivative liability on the Balance Sheet. The ~~derviatives~~derivatives were revalued at September 30, 2018 and determined to have a de minimis fair value.

On August 2, 2018, the Company and CVP agreed to an amendment extending the maturity date to August 26, 2019, and limiting the aggregate amount that CVP is permitted to redeem on a monthly basis to $500,000, which is the maximum aggregate redemption amount for all notes outstanding with CVP. This amendment resulted in the Company accounting for the transaction as a troubled debt restructuring, under which the carrying amount of the note payable remained unchanged but interest expense is computed using a new effective rate that equates the present value of the future cash payments specified by the new terms with the carrying amount of the note.

Table of Contents

Between October 2018 and December ~~31,~~2018, the Company and CVP renegotiated the terms of the June 2017 Note agreement such that CVP agreed not to make any redemptions of the Note until March 2019. In consideration of this standstill arrangement, the Company paid CVP a total standstill fee of $499,403 for all four CVP Notes. The standstill fee allocated to the June 2017 Note was $63,296, of which $37,296 increased the principal balance and ~~March 31, 2018 using~~$26,000 was paid in cash. These restructurings in whole represented four separate restructurings of the ~~same Model~~June 2017 ConvertibleNote agreement, resulting in two troubled debt restructurings accounted for under ASC 470-60 and two modificationsaccounted for under ASC 470-50. For the two modifications resulting in troubled debt restructurings, the changes wereaccounted for prospectively and a ~~combined fair~~new effective interest rate was determined that equated the present value of ~~$11,000 and $15,000, respectively. The $4,000 loss is included~~ the futurecash payments specified by the new terms with the carrying amount of the Note. For the two modifications that resultedin ~~other income and expense in~~modification accounting, a new effective rate was determined at the ~~statement~~date of ~~income and comprehensive income.~~

modification that equated the revisedcash flows to the carrying amount of the Note.

The balance of the ~~note payable~~June 2017 convertible debt as of ~~$540,684, consisting~~March 31, 2019 of $703,193 consists of the ~~$2,155,000~~$740,882 face value of the note less a note ~~discounts~~discount of $37,689, and ~~debt issuance costs of $509,000, less the $20,000 derivative liability, less principal payments of $1,451,454, plus the accretion of the debt discount and debt issuance costs of $366,098,~~ is included in convertible ~~notes payable on~~debt in the current liabilities section of the consolidated balance sheet. The balance of the June 2017 convertible debt as of December 31, 2018 of $685,282 consisted of the $740,882 face value of the note less a note discount of $55,600, and is included in convertible debt in the current liabilities section of the consolidated balance sheet.

~~Interest payable on the accumulation of all convertible notes was $121,018 and $118,228 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.~~

Napo Convertible Notes ~~Payable~~

March 2017 Convertible Notes

In March 2017, Napo entered into an exchangeable Note Purchase Agreement with two lenders for the funding of face amount of $1,312,500 in two $525,000 tranches of face amount $656,250. The notes bear interest at 3% and mature on December 1, 2017. Interest may be paid at maturity in either cash or shares of Jaguar per terms of the exchangeable note purchase agreement. The notes may be exchanged for up to 2,343,752 shares of Jaguar common stock, prior to maturity date. The Company assumed the notes at fair value of $1,312,500 as part of the Napo Merger. At December 31, 2017, the accrued interest on these notes is $29,774. The fair value was calculated using the Binomial Lattice Model using the following criteria: stock price of $0.5893, expected term of tranche 1 of 0.34 years and tranche 2 of 0.42 years, conversion price of $0.56, volatility of tranche 1 of 70% and tranche 2 of 100%, and risk free rate of tranche 1 of 1.09% and tranche 2 of 1.13%.

First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement and Notes

In December 2017, Napo amended the exchangeable note purchase agreement to extend the maturity of the first tranche and second tranche of notes to February 15, 2018 and April 1, 2018, respectively, increase the principal amount by 12%, and reduce the conversion price from $0.56 per share to $0.20 per share. The Company also issued 2,492,084 shares of common stock to the lenders in connection with this amendment to partially redeem $299,050 from the first tranche of the notes. The amended face value of the notes iswas $1,170,950. This amendment resulted in the Company treating the notes as having been extinguished and replaced with new notes for accounting purposes due to meeting the 10% cash flow test. The Company calculated a loss on extinguishment of notes of $157,500, which is included in loss on extinguishment of debt in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. The conversion option in the notes was bifurcated and accounted for as a conversion option liability at its fair value of $111,841 using the Black-Scholes-Merton model and the following criteria: stock price of $0.14 per share, conversion prices of $0.20 per share, expected life of 0.13 to 0.25 years, volatility of 86.29% to 160.78%, risk free rate of 1.28% to 1.39% and dividend rate of 0%. The $111,841 was included in conversion option liability on the balance sheet and in loss on extinguishment of debt on the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

At December 31, 2017, the balance of the notes payable of $1,170,950 was included in convertible notes payable in current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet. The accrued interest on these notes of $29,774 is included in accrued expenses in current liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet.value.

Second Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement and Notes

On February 16, 2018, Napo amended the exchangeable note purchase agreement to extend the maturity date of the Second Tranche Notes from April 1, 2018 to May 1, 2018. In addition, the Company also issued 3,783,444 shares of ~~Common Stock~~common stock to the Purchasers as repayment of the remaining $435,950 aggregate principal amount ~~of the original issue discount exchangeable promissory notes previously issued by Napo to the Purchasers on March 1, 2017 pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement (the “First Tranche Notes”)~~ and $18,063 in accrued and unpaid interest thereon. On March 23, 2018, the Company paid off the remaining $735,000 of principal and ~~$20,699.38~~$20,699 in interest due on the second tranche debt in cash with proceeds from the March 23, 2018 equity financing. The fair value of the conversion option liability was again revalued at March 23, 2018 using the Black-Scholes-Merton model using the following criteria: stock price of $0.21 per share, expected life of 0.11 years, volatility of 288.16%, risk free rate of 1.69% and dividend rate of 0%, resulting in an increase of $174,754 to the fair value of the conversion option liability and included in the change in fair value of warrants and conversion option liability in the statements of ~~operations and comprehensive loss.~~operations. The underlying debt was paid off in March of 2018 and the $286,595 conversion option liability was written off to other income in the ~~statement~~statements of ~~operations and comprehensive loss.~~operations.

Table of Contents

December 2016 Convertible ~~Long-term Debt~~Notes

In December 2016, Napo entered into a note purchase agreement which provided for the sale of up to $12,500,000 face amount of notes and issued convertible promissory notes (the Napo December 2016 Notes) in the aggregate face amount of $2,500,000 to three lenders and received proceeds of $2,000,000 which resulted in $500,000 of original issue discount. In July 2017, Napo issued convertible promissory notes (the Napo July 2017 Notes) in the aggregate face amount of $7,500,000 to four lenders and received proceeds of $6,000,000 which resulted in $1,500,000 of original issue discount. The Napo December 2016 Notes and the Napo July 2017 Notes mature on December 30, 2019 and bear interest at 10% with interest due each six-month period after December 30, 2016. On June 30, 2017, the accrued interest of $125,338 was added to principal of the Napo December Notes, and the new principal balance became $2,625,338. Interest may be paid in cash or in the stock of Jaguar per terms of the note purchase agreement. In each one year period beginning December 30, 2016, up to one-third of the principal and accrued interest on the notes may be converted into the common stock of the merged entity at a conversion price of $0.925 per share. The Company assumed these convertible notes at fair value of $11,161,000 as part of the Napo Merger. The fair value was calculated using the Binomial Lattice Model using the following criteria: stock price of $0.5893, expected term of 2.42 years, conversion price of $0.925, volatility of 115%, and risk free rate of 1.41%. The ~~$1,035,661~~$1,035,661 difference between the fair value of the notes and the principal balance iswas being amortized over the twenty-nine (29) month period from July 31, 2017 to December 31, ~~2019 or $178,562 and is recorded as a contra interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.~~2019. Interest expense is paid every ~~six~~nine months through the issuance of common stock. On March 16, 2018, $534,775 of interest accrued through January 31, 2018 and $169,950 of certain legal expenses were paid through the issuance of ~~4,285,423~~285,694 shares of the Company's common stock. In August 2018, the Company paid $479,808 of accrued interest through July 31, 2018 with the issuance of 320,743 shares of the Company’s common stock. In January 2019, $446,729 of accrued interest was paid through the issuance of 1,382,636 shares of the Company's common stock. At March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017,~~2018, the unamortized balance of the convertible note payable ~~is $10,875,300~~was $10,446,751 and $10,982,438 which are included in Convertible Long-term Debt on the balance sheet, and the accrued interest on these notes is $163,670 and $448,779 as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and are included in accrued interest on the balance sheets. Interest of $249,666 less $107,167 of debt appreciation amortization or $142,529 was included in interest expense in the statements of operations and comprehensive income in the three months ended March 31, 2018.

~~Long-term Debt~~$10,553,888, respectively.

Notes Payable

As of March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and December 31, ~~2017, the net Jaguar long-term debt obligation was as follows:~~

March 31,

December 31,

2018

2017

Debt and unpaid accrued end-of-term payment

$
—

$
1,636,639

Unamortized note discount

—

(6,615
)
Unamortized debt issuance costs

—

(20,780
)
Net debt obligation

$
—

$
1,609,244

Current portion of long-term debt

$
—

$
1,609,244

Long-term debt, net of discount

—

—

Total

$
—

$
1,609,244

~~Interest expense on the Jaguar long-term debt for the three months ended March 31,~~ 2018, ~~and 2017 was as follows:~~

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

Nominal interest

$
19,344

$
78,861

Accretion of debt discount

20,779

11,678

Accretion of end-of-term payment

52,561

48,655

Accretion of debt issuance costs

6,616

36,439

$
99,300

$
175,633

~~Interest payable on the Jaguar long-term debt was $0 and $9,422 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.~~

In August 2015, the Company entered into a loan and security agreement with a lender for up to $8.0 million, which provided for an initial loan commitment of $6.0 million. The loan agreement requires the Company to maintain $4.5 million of the proceeds in cash, which may be reduced or eliminated on the achievement of certain milestones. An additional $2.0 million is available contingent on the achievement of certain further milestones. The agreement has a term of three years, with interest only payments through February 29, 2016. Thereafter, principal and interest payments will be made with an interest rate of 9.9%. Additionally, there will be a balloon payment of $600,000 on August 1, 2018 (as modified in the third amendment to the Loan Agreement). This amount is being recognized over the term of the loan agreement and the effective interest rate, considering the balloon payment, is 15.0%. Proceeds to the Company were net of a $134,433 debt discount under the terms of the loan agreement. This debt discount is being recorded as interest expense, using the interest method, over the term of the loan agreement. Under the agreement, the Company is entitled to prepay principal and accrued interest upon five days prior notice to the lender. In the event of prepayment, the Company is obligated to pay a prepayment charge. If such prepayment is made during any of the first twelve months of the loan agreement, the prepayment charge will be (a) during such time as the Company is required to maintain a minimum cash balance, 2% of the minimum cash balance amount plus 3% of the difference between the amount being prepaid and the minimum cash balance, and (b) after such time as the Company is no longer required to maintain a minimum cash balance, 3% of the amount being prepaid. If such prepayment is made during any time after the first twelve months of the loan agreement, 1% of the amount being prepaid.

On April 21, 2016, the loan and security was amended upon which the Company repaid $1.5 million of the debt out of restricted cash. The amendment modified the repayment amortization schedule providing a four-month period of interest only payments for the period from May through August 2016.

On July 7, 2017, the Company entered into the third amendment to the Loan Agreement upon which the Company paid $1.0 million of the outstanding loan balance, and the Lender waived the Prepayment Charge associated with such prepayment. The Third Amendment modified the repayment schedule providing a three-month period of interest only payments for the period from August 2017 through October 2017, and reduced the required cash amount that the Company must keep on hand to $500,000, which will be reduced following the Lender’s receipt of each principal repayment subsequent to the $1.0 million. As the present value of the cash flows under the terms of the third amendment is less than 10% different from the remaining cash flows under the terms of the loan agreement prior to the amendment, the third amendment was accounted as a debt modification.

~~Notes Payable~~

~~As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017,~~ the net Jaguar short-term notes payable was as follows:


	March 31,		December 31,
	2019		2018
		(unaudited)
December 2017 note payable	$	862,172	$	1,673,237
February 2018 note payable		315,123		2,359,750
March 2018 note payable		—		1,147,870
March 2019 note payable		800,000		—
	$	1,977,295	$	5,180,857
Less: unamortized discount and debt issuance costs		(718,749)		(335,282)
Net note payable obligation	$	1,258,546	$	4,845,575

Notes Payable

March 31,

December 31,

2018

2017

December 2017 note payable

$
1,587,500

$
1,587,500

February 2018 note payable

2,240,909

—

March 2018 note payable

1,090,341

—

4,918,750

1,587,500

Less: unamortized net discount and debt issuance costs

(1,262,651
)
(446,347
)
Net convertible notes payable obligation

$
3,656,099

$
1,141,153

~~Interest expense on the Jaguar short-term notes payable for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:~~

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

Nominal interest

$
49,659

$
—

Accretion of debt discount

204,946

—

Total interest expense on notes payable

$
254,605

$
—

~~Interest payable on the Jaguar short-term notes payable was $57,793 and $8,134 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.~~

December 2017 Note

On December 8, 2017, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with CVP pursuant to which the Company issued a promissory note (the “Note”) in the aggregate principal amount of $1,587,500 for an aggregate purchase price of $1,100,000. The Note carries an original issue discount of $462,500, and the initial principal balance also includes $25,000 to cover CVP’s transaction expenses. The Company will use the proceeds for general corporate purposes. The Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum and matures on August 26, 2019.

On August 2, 2018, the Company and CVP amended the December 2017 Note agreement, extending the maturity date from September 8, ~~2018.~~2018 to August 26, 2019, and limiting the aggregate amount that CVP is permitted to redeem on a monthly basis to $500,000, which amount is the maximum aggregate amount for the Notes collectively. This amendment resulted in the Company accounting for the transaction as a troubled debt restructuring, under which the carrying amount of the note payable remained unchanged but interest expense is computed using a new effective rate

Table of Contents

that equates the present value of the future cash payments specified by the new terms with the carrying amount of the note. The principal balance of the note payable of $1,301,783 consists of the $1,587,500 face value of the note less note discounts and debt issuance costs of $487,500, plus the accretion of the debt discount and debt issuance costs of $201,783, is included in notes payable in the current liabilities section of the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Between October 2018 and December 2018, the Company and CVP renegotiated the terms of the December 2017 Note agreement such that CVP agreed not to make any redemptions of the Note until March 2019. In consideration of this standstill arrangement, the Company paid CVP a total standstill fee of $499,403 for all four CVP Notes. The standstill fee allocated to the December 2017 Note was $141,737, of which $85,737 increased the principal balance and $56,000 was paid in cash. These modifications in whole represented four separate restructurings of the December 2017 Note agreement, resulting in two troubled debt restructurings accounted for under ASC 470-60 and two modifications accounted for under ASC 470-50. For the two restructurings resulting in troubled debt restructurings, the changes were accounted for prospectively and a new effective interest rate was determined that equated the present value of the future cash payments specified by the new terms with the carrying amount of the Note. For the two modifications that resulted in modification accounting, a new effective rate was determined at the date of modification that equated the revised cash flows to the carrying amount of the Note.

In March 2019, the Company and CVP amended the December 2017 Note agreement such that the Company prepaid principal and accrued interest of ~~$40,364~~$811,065 and ~~$8,333 at~~$178,755, respectively, in shares of the Company’s common stock. The exchange of debt for common stock was considered a substantial change to the Note and therefore the exchange resulted in extinguishment accounting and a corresponding extinguishment loss of $243,419. At March 31, ~~2018 and~~2019, the net carrying value of the December 2017 Note was $862,172. At December 31, ~~2017, which is included in accrued expenses on~~2018, the balance sheet, and incurred nonmal interest of $32,230 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company accreted debt discount of $160,630 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

~~In addition, beginning on January 31, 2018, CVP will have the right to redeem a portion~~net carrying value of the ~~outstanding balance of the~~December 2017 Note in any amount up to $350,000 per month for the first six months following the Purchase Price Date and $500,000 per month thereafter. For purposes of calculating the maximum amount that may be redeemed in any month, the amounts redeemed under thewas $1,548,829.

February 2018 Note will be aggregated with all redemption amounts under the Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $2,155,000 issued by the Company in favor of the creditor on June 29, 2017.

On February 26, 2018, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with ~~Chicago Venture Partners, L.P. (“CVP”),~~CVP, pursuant to which the Company issued to CVP a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $2,240,909 for an aggregate purchase price of $1,560,000. The Note carries an original issue discount of $655,909, and the initial principal balance also includes $25,000 to cover ~~CVP’s~~CVP's transaction expenses. The Company will use the proceeds for general corporate purposes and working capital. The Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum and matures on ~~(i)~~ August 26, ~~2019 if the Company has raised at least $12 million in equity after the issuance date of the Note (the “Redemption Start Condition”)~~2019.

Between October 2018 and on or before April 1, 2018 or (ii) November 26, 2018 if the Redemption Start Condition is not satisfied on or before April 1, 2018. The balance of the note payable of $1,599,217 consisting of the $2,240,909 face value of the note less note discounts and debt issuance costs of $680,909, plus the accretion of the debt discount and debt issuance costs of $39,217, is included in notes payable in the current liabilities section of the balance sheet. The Company accrued interest of $15,489 at March 31, 2018, which is included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet, and incurred nonmal interest of $15,489 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company accreted debt discount of $39,217 in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

In addition, beginning on the Redemption Start Date (as defined below), the Company has the right to redeem all or any portion of the outstanding balance of the Note in cash or as otherwise mutually agreed upon between the parties. The Redemption Start Date is the date that is (i) seven months from the effective date of the Note (the “Effective Date”) if the Redemption Start Condition is satisfied by April 1, 2018 or (ii) six months from the Effective Date if (x) the Redemption Start Condition is not satisfied by April 1, 2018 or (y) at any time after the Effective Date CVP breaches any of the covenants set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement.

~~If the Redemption Start Condition is satisfied by April 1,~~December 2018, the Company and CVP also agree to amend that certain Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the original amount of $2,155,000 issued by Company in favor of CVP on June 29, 2017 (the “June 2017 Note”) and that certain Secured Promissory Note in the original amount of $1,587,500 issued by Company in favor of CVP on December 8, 2017 (the “December 2017 Note,” and together with the June 2017 Note, the “Prior Notes”) to (i) extend the maturity date of the Prior Notes to August 26, 2019, (ii) postpone the date on which CVP can exercise its right to redeem the Prior Notes to September 26, 2018 and (iii) limit the aggregate amount that CVP is permitted to redeem on a monthly basis to $500,000, which amount is the maximum aggregate redemption amount for the Prior Notes and the Note collectively.

~~The Securities Purchase Agreement and the other transaction documents and obligations of the Company thereunder are subject in all respects to~~renegotiated the terms of the February 2018 Note agreement such that ~~certain subordination~~CVP agreed not to make any redemptions of the Note until March 2019. In consideration of this standstill arrangement, the Company paid CVP a total standstill fee of $499,403 for all four CVP Notes. The standstill fee allocated to the February 2018 Note was $198,841, of which $118,841 increased the principal balance and $80,000 was paid in cash. These modifications in whole represented four separate restructurings of the February 2018 Note agreement, resulting in a debt extinguishment accounted for under ASC 470-50, two troubled debt restructurings accounted for under ASC 470-60 and ~~right~~a debt modification accounted for under ASC 470-50. For the debt extinguishment, the Company recorded an extinguishment loss of $102,296. For the two troubled debt restructurings, the changes were accounted for prospectively and a new effective interest rate was determined that equated the present value of the future cash payments specified by the new terms with the carrying amount of the Note. For the modification that resulted in modification accounting, a new effective rate was determined at the date of modification that equated the revised cash flows to ~~purchase debt (the “Subordination Agreement”)~~the carrying amount of the Note.

In March 2019, the Company and CVP amended the February 2018 Note agreement such that the Company ~~entered into with CVP with Hercules Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”) on June 29, 2017, pursuant to which (i) CVP subordinated (a) all~~prepaid principal and accrued interest of $2,044,627 and $203,866, respectively, in shares of the Company’s common stock. The exchange of debt for common stock was considered a substantial change to the Note and ~~obligations to CVP to all~~therefore the exchange resulted in extinguishment accounting and a corresponding extinguishment loss of $487,865. At March 31, 2019, the net carrying value of the ~~Company’s indebtedness and obligations to Hercules and (b) all of CVP’s security interest, if any, in~~February 2018 Note was $315,123. At December 31, 2018, the ~~Company’s assets to all of Hercules’ security interest in the Company’s assets and (ii) Hercules granted CVP the right to purchase 100%~~net carrying value of the ~~debt under the Company’s term loan so long as the purchase includes the full pay-out of funds owed to Hercules under the term loan at such time.~~February 2018 Note was $2,290,865.

~~The Company also entered into a security agreement with CVP, pursuant to which CVP will receive a security interest in substantially all~~Table of the Company’s assets. The security interest is effective upon CVP’s purchase of the Company’s outstanding obligations under that certain loan and security agreement, dated August 18, 2015, between the Company and Hercules Capital, Inc. or upon such time that the Hercules Loan is otherwise repaid in full.Contents

March 2018 Note

On March 21, 2018, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with CVP, pursuant to which the Company issued to CVP a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,090,341 for an aggregate purchase price of $750,000. The Note carries an original issue discount of $315,341, and the initial principal balance also includes $25,000 to cover ~~CVP’s~~CVP's transaction expenses. The Company will use the proceeds to fully repay certain prior secured and unsecured indebtedness. The Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum and matures on September 21, 2019.

Between October 2018 and December 2018, the Company and CVP renegotiated the terms of the March 2018 Note agreement such that CVP agreed not to make any redemptions of the Note until March 2019. In consideration of this standstill arrangement, the Company paid CVP a total standstill fee of $499,403 for all four CVP Notes. The standstill fee allocated to the March 2018 Note was $95,529, of which $57,529 increased the principal balance and $38,000 was paid in cash. These modifications in whole represented four separate restructurings of the March 2018 Note agreement, resulting in a debt extinguishment accounted for under ASC 470-50, two troubled debt restructurings accounted for under ASC 470-60, and a debt modification accounted for under ASC 470-50. For the debt extinguishment, the Company recorded an extinguishment loss of $223,824. For the two troubled debt restructurings, the changes were accounted for prospectively and a new effective interest rate was determined that equated the present value of the future cash payments specified by the new terms with the carrying amount of the Note. For the modification that resulted in modification accounting, a new effective rate was determined at the date of modification that equated the revised cash flows to the carrying amount of the Note

~~Under~~Between January 2019 and March 2019, the Company and CVP amended the March 2018 Note agreement such that the Company prepaid principal and accrued interest of $1,050,114 and $85,681, respectively, in shares of the Company’s common stock. These exchanges in whole represented four separate prepayments of principal and accrued interest, resulting in a three debt extinguishments and one debt modification accounted. For the debt extinguishments, the Company recorded an aggregate extinguishment loss of $1,210,676. For the modification, a new effective rate was determined at the date of modification that equated the revised cash flows to the carrying amount of the Note. At March 31, 2019, the March 2018 Note had been fully extinguished. At December 31, 2018, the net carrying value of the March 2018 Note was $1,005,880.

March 2019 Bridge Notes

In March 2019, the Company began entering into securities purchase agreements with selected accredited investors, pursuant to which the Company may issue up to $5.5 million aggregate principal amount of promissory notes to such Investors. As an inducement for entering into the Securities Purchase Agreement, each Investor also received warrants exercisable for shares of common stock.

Upon the close of initial offering on March 18, 2019, the Company issued two short-term Promissory Notes of $500,000 and $300,000. The Notes bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum and mature in July 2019. Concurrent to issuing the Notes, the Company issued to each Noteholder a warrant pursuant to which the number of warrant shares is equal to 125% of the Note principal, divided by the exercise price. The exercise price is either (i) the price the Company issues common shares in its next public offering subject to ~~certain covenants, including~~a registration statement or (ii) if no such offering is consummated by the ~~obligations~~four-month maturity date of the ~~Company to: (i) timely file all reports required~~Notes, then the exercise price is equal to ~~be filed under Sections 13 or 15(d) of~~ the ~~Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and not terminate its status as an issuer required to file reports under the Exchange Act; (ii) maintain listing~~closing price of the Company’s common stock on ~~a securities exchange; (iii) avoid trading in~~ the ~~Company’s common stock from being suspended, halted, chilled, frozen or otherwise ceased; (iv) not issue any variable securities (i.e., Company securities that (a) have conversion rights~~Notes four-month maturity date. The warrants for the $500,000 and $300,000 notes had an issuance date fair value of ~~any kind in which~~$557,946 and $334,767, respectively. At March 31, 2019, the ~~number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the conversion right varies with the market price~~net carrying value of the ~~Company’s common stock~~March 2019 notes was $81,249, or ~~(b) are or may become convertible~~principal of $800,000 offset by a discount of $718,749.

Long-term Debt

On March 23, 2018, the Company paid off the remaining $689,345 of principal, $4,471 of interest, and the end-of-term payment of $600,000 in cash with proceeds from the March 23, 2018 equity financing. Interest expense on the long-term debt was $0 and $99,300 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively

Table of Contents

Warrants

A summary of the outstanding warrant shares exercisable into shares of the Company’s common stock ~~with a conversion price that varies with~~for the ~~market price of such stock) that generate gross cash proceeds to~~three months ended March 31, 2019 and for the Company of less than the lesser of $1 million and the then-current outstanding balance of the Note without CVP’s prior consent; (v) not grant a security interest in its assets without CVP’s prior consent; (vi) not issue any shares of common stock to certain institutional investors; (vii) repay the Hercules Loan (as defined below) on or before March 26, 2018; (viii) repay all outstanding amounts owed to certain noteholders within five trading days of the date of issuance of the Note; (ix) not incur any debt other than in the ordinary course of business, and in no event greater than $10,000, without CVP’s prior consent; and (x) other customary covenants and obligations, for which the Company’s failure to comply may be subject to certain liquidated damages. The Hercules Loan was repaid in full on March 23,year ended December 31, 2018 ~~simultaneously with the closing of the Preferred Stock Offering.~~

In addition, beginning seven months from the effective date of the Note or at any time after the Effective Date if the Company breaches any of the covenants set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement, CVP has the right to redeem all or any portion of the outstanding balance of the Note in cash oris as ~~otherwise mutually agreed upon between the parties.~~follows:


	Three Months Ended		Year Ended
	March 31,		December 31,
	2019		2018
		(unaudited)
Warrants outstanding, beginning balance		2,427,653		321,314
Issuances		2,638,412		2,166,588
Expirations and cancellations		(38,570)		(60,249)
Warrants outstanding, end of period		5,027,495		2,427,653

Since the Redemption Start Condition (i.e., the Company raised at least $12 million in equity after the issuance date of the Note) was satisfied by April 1, 2018 as a result of the consummation of the Preferred Stock Offering and Common Stock Offering, the Company and CVP agreed to amend the Notes issued to CVP on June 29, 2017, December 8, 2017 and February 26, to limit the aggregate amount that CVP is permitted to redeem on a monthly basis to $500,000, which amount is the maximum aggregate redemption amount for the Notes collectively.November 2016 Series A Warrants

~~Warrants~~

OnIn November ~~22,~~ 2016, the Company entered into a Securities ~~Purchase Agreement, or the 2016~~ Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors pursuant to which the Company ~~sold securities to such investors in a private placement transaction, which we refer to herein as the 2016 Private Placement. In the 2016 Private Placement, the Company sold~~issued an aggregate of ~~1,666,668~~111,111 shares of the Company’s common ~~stock at a price of $0.60 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $1.0 million.~~stock. The investors ~~in the 2016 Private Placement~~ also received ~~(i)~~ warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of ~~1,666,668~~111,111 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of ~~$0.75~~$11.25 per share, or the Series A Warrants, and the Placement Agent received warrants to purchase ~~133,333~~8,889 shares of our common stock in lieu of cash for service fees with the same terms as the investors; (ii) warrants to purchase up to an aggregate 1,666,668 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $0.90 per share, or the Series B Warrants, and (iii) warrants to purchase up to an aggregate 1,666,668 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, or the Series C Warrants and, together with theinvestors. The Series A ~~Warrants~~warrants and ~~the Series B Warrants, the 2016 Warrants. The~~placement agent warrants were ~~granted in three series with different terms. The warrants were~~initially valued using the ~~Black-Scholes-Merton~~Black-Scholes warrant pricing model ~~as follows:~~

· ~~Series A Warrants and Placement Agent Warrants: 1,666,668~~using the following assumptions: 111,111 warrant shares with a strike price of ~~$0.75~~$11.25 per share and an expiration date of May 29, 2022; and ~~133,333~~8,889 warrant shares to the placement agent with a strike price of ~~$0.75~~$11.25 and an expiration date of May 29, 2022; the expected life is 5.5 years, the volatility iswas 71.92% and the risk free rate iswas 1.87% ~~in valuing these warrants.~~

· ~~Series B Warrants: 1,666,668 warrant shares with a strike price of $0.90 per share and~~. The warrants had an ~~expiration~~issuance date ~~of November 29, 2017; the expected life is one year, the volatility is 116.65% and the risk free rate is 0.78% in valuing these warrants.~~

· Series C Warrants: 1,666,668 warrant shares with a strike price of $1.00 per share and an expiration date of May 29, 2018; the expected life is 1.5 years, the volatility is 116.92% and the risk free rate is 0.94%.

~~The warrant valuation date was November 29, 2016 and the closing price of $0.69 per share was used in determining the~~ fair value of ~~the warrants. The series A warrants and placement agent warrants were valued at $756,001~~$756,000 and were classified as a liability. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the warrant liability ~~in the Company’s balance sheet.~~was valued at $10,994 and $7,388, respectively. The series A warrants and placement agent warrants were revalued on December 31, 2016 at $799,201 which is included in the Company’s balance sheet, and the $43,200 increase is included in the Company’s statementschange of ~~operations and comprehensive loss. The stock price~~$3,606 was ~~$0.716, the strike price was $0.75 per share, the expected life was 5.41 years, the volatility was 73.62% and the risk free rate was 2.0%. The series B and C warrants were classified~~recorded as equity, and as such were not subject to revaluation at year end. Costs incurred in connection with the issuance were allocated based on the relative fair values of the Series A and the Series B and C warrants. The series A warrants and placement agent warrants were revalued on December 31, 2017 at $103,860 and is included in the Company’s balance sheet. The valuation reflects a ~~reduction of $695,341 from the $799,201 December 31, 2016 valuation. The reduction is included~~loss in the Company’s statements of operations ~~and comprehensive loss. The $103,860 valuation at December 31, 2017 was computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model using a stock price~~(see Note 3).

August 2018 Financing Warrants

In August 2018, in consideration of ~~$0.1398, the strike price was $0.75 per share, the expected life was 4.41 years, the volatility was 96.36% and the risk free rate was 2.14%.~~

~~On July 31, 2017,~~services provided, the Company entered into Warrant Exercise Agreements (the “Exercise Agreements”) with certain holders of Series C Warrants (the “Exercising Holders”), which Exercising Holders own, in the aggregate, Series C Warrants exercisable for 908,334 shares of the Company’s common stock. Pursuantissued a warrant to ~~the Exercise Agreements, the Exercising Holders and the Company agreed that the Exercising Holders would exercise their Series C Warrants with respect to 908,334~~purchase 30,000 shares of common stock underlying such Series C Warrants for a reduced exercise price equal to $0.40 per share. The Company received aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $363,334 from the exercise of the Series C Warrants by the Exercising Holders. The difference between the pre-modification and post-modification fair value of $23,000 was expensed in general and administrative expensewhich were exercisable only in the ~~statements~~event that the Company raised new financing of ~~operations~~at least $3 million, and comprehensive income. The pre-modification fair value was computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton model using a stock price of $0.56 (fair market value on modification date), original strike price of $1.00, expected life of 0.83expired five years ~~volatility of 115.28%, risk-free rate of 1.20% to arrive at a fair value of $0.1347 per share. The post-modification fair value was computed using the intrinsic value on~~from the date of ~~modification or $0.16 per share.~~

The Company granted warrants to purchase the 1,224,875 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price price of $0.08 per share to replace Napo warrants upon the consummation of the Merger. Of the 1,224,875 warrants, 145,457 warrants expire on December 31, 2018 and 1,079,418 warrants expire on December 31, 2025.issuance. The warrants were valued at ~~$630,859,~~$17,582 using the ~~Black-Scholes-Merton warrant~~Black-Scholes option pricing model as follows: exercise price of ~~$0.08~~$1.06 per share, stock price of ~~$0.56~~$1.06 per share, expected life ~~ranging from 1.42 years to 8.42~~of five years, volatility ~~ranging from 75.07% to 110.03%~~of 126%, and ~~risk free~~a risk-free rate ~~ranging from 1.28% to 2.14%~~of 3.83%. The warrants were ~~accounted~~classified in stockholders’ equity.

~~The Company’s warrant activity is summarized as follows:~~

Three Months Ended

Year Ended

March 31,

December 31,

2018

2017

(in shares)

Beginning balance

4,820,025

5,968,876

Warrants granted

—

1,595,791

Warrants exercised

—

(908,334
)
Warrants cancelled

—

(1,836,308
)
Ending balance

4,820,025

4,820,025

~~9. Stockholders’ Equity~~

~~Common Stock~~

~~On July 31, 2017,~~ In October 2018, in a public offering, the Company ~~filed a third amended~~met the $3 million new financing threshold and ~~restated certificate~~the warrants became exercisable.

August 2018 License Transaction Warrants

In August 2018, in consideration of ~~incorporation authorizing~~services provided, the Company ~~to issue 250,000,000~~issued a warrant the exercise of which was contingent upon either (i) the Company consummating a Licensing Transaction within six months of August 2018, the occurrence of which would result in the warrant becoming immediately exercisable for 66,667 shares of common stock, ~~$0.0001 par value~~or (ii) the Company consummating a Licensing Transaction after six months and ~~50,000,000~~within twelve months of ~~convertible non-voting common stock, $0.0001 par value per share. The holders~~August 2018, the occurrence of which would result in the warrant becoming immediately exercisable for 33,333 shares of common stock. The warrant was valued at $6,312 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as follows: exercise price of

Table of Contents

$1.06 per share, stock ~~are entitled~~price of $1.06 per share, expected life of five years, volatility of 126%, and a risk-free rate of 3.83%. The warrants were classified in stockholders’ equity.

October 2018 Underwriter Warrants

In October 2018, in consideration of services provided leading up to one vote for each share of common stock held at all meetings of stockholders. The holders of non-voting common stock are not entitled to vote, except on an as converted basis with respect to any change of control ofthe Company’s October 2018 public offering, the Company ~~that is submitted~~issued warrants to ~~the stockholders~~various service providers to purchase an aggregate of ~~the Company for approval.The number of authorized~~1,200,000 shares of common stock ~~may be increased or decreased by~~at an exercise price of $0.75 per common share. The warrants were valued at $611,286 using the ~~affirmative vote~~Black- Scholes option pricing model as follows: exercise price of $0.75 per share, stock price of $0.59 per share, expected life of five years, volatility of 138%, and a risk-free rate of 2.51%. The warrants were classified as liabilities pursuant to ASC 815-40 as there was potential cash settlement. As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the ~~holders~~warrant liability was valued at $274,018 and $212,988, respectively. The change of ~~shares~~$61,030 was recorded as a loss in the Company’s statements of ~~capital stock~~operations.

March 2019 Ladenburg Warrants

In March 2019, in consideration of services provided in the Company’s March 2019 public offering of 1,331,332 common shares, the Company ~~representing a majority~~issued to Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. warrants to purchase an aggregate of ~~the votes represented by all shares (including Preferred Stock) entitled to vote. Shares of Jaguar non-voting~~ common stock have the same rights to dividends and other distributions and are convertible into shares of Jaguar common stock on a one-for-one basis upon transfers to non-affiliates of Nantucket (“former creditor of Napo”), upon the release from escrow of certain non-voting shares held by the former creditors of Napo to the legacy stockholders of Napo under specified conditions and at any time on or after April 1, 2018 at the option of the respective holders thereof. And on March 12, 2018, the Company filed a fourth amended and restated certificate of incorporation authorizing the Company to issue 500,000,00052,253 shares of common stock ~~$0.0001 par value~~at an exercise price of $0.25 per common share. The warrants were valued at $13,028 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as follows: exercise price of $0.25 per share, stock price of $0.27 per share, expected life of five years, volatility of 146%, and ~~50,000,000~~a risk-free rate of ~~convertible non-voting common stock, $0.0001 par value per share.~~2.21%. The warrants were classified in stockholders’ equity.

On June 28, 2017, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with an existing private investor. Upon execution of the agreement the Company sold 100,000 shares of its common stock in exchange for $50,000 in cash proceeds.

On July 31, 2017, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with an existing investor. Upon execution of the agreement the Company sold 3,243,243 shares of voting common stock in exchange for $3.0 million in cash proceeds.

On July 31, 2017, the Company completed the merger with Napo and changed it’s name to Jaguar Health, Inc. The Company issued 2,282,445 shares of voting common stock and 43,173,288 shares of non-voting stock at the time the merger was consummated.

March 2019 LOC Warrants

In ~~November 2017,~~March 2019, in consideration of a letter of credit cancellation related to the Company’s office lease, the Company issued ~~235,134~~a warrant to purchase warrant shares equal to 75% of ~~common stock to an existing investor in exchange for $43,829 in services rendered.~~

~~In November and December 2017,~~the $122,000 principal amount of the Letter of Credit, divided by the exercise price. The exercise price is either (i) the price the Company ~~issued 6,492,084~~issues common shares ~~of common stock~~in its next public offering subject to a ~~convertible debt holder as redemption~~registration statement or (ii) if no such offering is consummated by the four-month maturity date of ~~$900,362 of debt principal and interest.~~

~~In November and December 2017, in a private investment in public entitites,~~ the ~~Company issued 5,100,000 shares of its common stock with a single investor in exchange for $555,262 in cash. And in January, February and March 2018,~~warrant, then the ~~Company issued an additional 9,746,413 shares of its common stock~~exercise price is equal to the ~~investor for an additional $1,305,774.~~

~~In December 2017, in a private investment in public entities, the Company entered into various purchase agreements with existing investors and issued 4,010,000 shares~~closing price of the Company’s common stock on the warrants four-month anniversary date. The warrants were classified as liabilities pursuant to ASC 480-10 as at their issuance date settlement is in ~~exchange for $401,000 in cash. And in January 2018, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements with existing investors and issued 7,182,818 shares~~a variable number of the Company’s common stock ~~in exchange for $750,100 in cash.~~worth a fixed amount, a feature that does not represent a residual interest. The warrants were initially valued at $116,297 using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as follows: exercise price of $0.25 per share, stock price of $0.28 per share, expected life of five years, volatility of 146%, and a risk-free rate of 2.23%. As of March 31, 2019, the warrant had a fair value of $116,297.

March 2019 Promissory Note Warrants

In ~~January 2018,~~March 2019, concurrent to entering into Promissory Notes of $500,000 and $300,000, the Company issued ~~50,000~~to the two Noteholders warrants to purchase warrant shares equal to 125% of ~~common stock to an existing investor in exchange for $6,425 in services rendered.~~

In the ~~first quarter of 2018,~~Note principal, divided by the exercise price. The exercise price is either (i) the price the Company ~~issued 12,314,291~~issues common shares ofin its ~~common stock in exchange for redemption of certain convertible debt.~~

~~In March of 2018,~~next public offering subject to a registration statement or (ii) if no such offering is consummated by the ~~Company issued 4,285,423 shares of its common stock in exchange for payment of interest expense on certain long-term convertible debt.~~

~~Concurrently with the consummation~~four-month maturity date of the ~~preferred stock offering as more fully discussed in Note 10, in March 2018,~~Notes, then the ~~Company entered into share purchase agreements with certain institutional investors pursuant~~exercise price is equal to ~~which~~ the ~~Company issued 29,411,766 shares~~closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Notes four-month maturity date.

The warrant for the $500,000 and $300,000 Promissory Notes were valued at $557,946 and $334,767, respectively, using the Black-Scholes option pricing model as follows: contingent exercise price of $0.47 per share, stock price of $0.47 per share, expected life of five years, volatility of 146%, and a risk-free rate of 2.42%. The warrants were classified as liabilities pursuant to ASC 480-10 as at their issuance date their settlement is in ~~exhcnage for $5.0 million in cash.~~

a variable number of the Company’s common stock worth a fixed amount, a feature that does not represent a residual interest. As of March 31, ~~2018~~2019, the warrant for the $500,000 and ~~2017,~~$300,000 Promissory Notes had a fair value of $546,334 and $327,800, respectively. The change of $18,579 was recorded as a gain in the ~~Company had reserved shares~~Company’s condensed consolidated statements of ~~common stock for issuance as follows:~~operations

March 31,

March 31,

2018

2017

Options issued and outstanding

15,646,054

2,528,650

Options available for grant

30,986,066

362,700

RSUs issued and outstanding

5,893,849

20,789

Warrants issued and outstanding

4,820,025

6,339,792

Convertible notes

11,767,883

69,869

Total

69,113,877

9,321,800

Table of Contents

~~10.~~8. Convertible Preferred Stock

~~The Company’s third amended and restated certificate of incorporation dated July 31, 2017 authorizes the Company to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock $0.0001 par value.~~

In March 2018, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. pursuant to which the Company, in a private placement, agreed to issue and sell to Sagard 5,524,926 shares of the ~~Company’s series~~Company's Series A convertible participating preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share, for an aggregate purchase price of ~~$9,199,001.~~$9,199,002. Each share of preferred stock is initially convertible into nine shares of common stock at the option of the holder at an effective conversion price of ~~$0.185~~$2.775 per share, ~~(based on an original price per Preferred Share of $1.665),~~ provided that, at any time prior to the time the Company obtains stockholder approval, as required pursuant to Nasdaq Rule 5635(b) any conversion of Preferred Stock by a holder into shares of the ~~Common Stock~~common stock would be prohibited if, as a result of such conversion, the holder, together with such ~~holder’s~~holder's attribution parties, would beneficially own more than 19.99% of the total number of shares of the ~~Common Stock~~common stock issued and outstanding after giving effect to such conversion. Subject to certain limited exceptions, the shares of Preferred Stock cannot be offered, pledged or sold by Sagard for one year from the date of issuance. The conversion price is subject to certain adjustments in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization.

Holders of the Series A shares are entitled to participate equally and ratably with the holders of common stock shares in all dividends paid and distributions made to the holders of the common stock as if, immediately prior to each record date of the common stock, the shares of Series A then outstanding were converted into shares of common stock.

In the event of any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company or deemed liquidation event, the holders of Series A shares then outstanding shall be entitled to be paid in cash out of the assets of the Company before any payment shall be made to the holders of common stock or shares of any series or class of preferred or other capital stock then outstanding that by its terms is junior to the Series A in respect of the preferences as to distributions and payments upon such liquidation event by reason of their ownership, an amount per share of Series A equal to one ~~(1)~~ times the Series A original issue price.

The redemption and liquidation value of the series A preferred stock is $12,738,822 and $9,199,002 ~~respectively.~~respectively, as of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. If a Redemption Event occurs as of the Measurement Date (the later of April 30, 2021 and the date on which the Company files its Form ~~10-Q~~10‑Q for the three months ending March 31, 2021, but in no event later than ~~June~~September 30, 2021), the holders of at least a majority of the shares of Series A then outstanding may require the Company to redeem all Series A shares at a per share purchase price equal to $2.3057; any one of the following conditions can result in a Redemption Event that is not solely within the ~~Company’s~~Company's control: Revenues attributable to the Mytesi product for the six-month period ended March 31, 2021 are less than ~~$22m~~$22.0 million or the average VWAP for the ~~Company’s~~Company's common stock for the 30 days prior to a Measurement Date is less than $1.00.

The effective conversion price is ~~$0.185~~$2.775 per share while the fair value of the ~~Company’s~~Company's common stock at the commitment date was ~~$0.205~~$3.075 per share based on the closing price of common stock on March 23, 2018. As a result, the Company determined that there is a Beneficial Conversion Feature (“BCF”) amounting to approximately $995,000, which is computed by taking the difference between the closing price of the stock on March 23, 2018 and the conversion price multiplied by the as if converted ~~49,724,334~~3,314,956 shares (5,524,926 preferred shares multiplied by the conversion factor of 9).6). The ~~Company’s~~Company's Series A ~~shares do~~Preferred Stock does not have a stated conversion date and are immediately convertible at the issuance date. ~~As such, the Company will record an accretion of the BCF to net loss.~~ Based on the guidance above, the Company recorded a deemed dividend charge of $995,000 for the accretion of the discount on the Series A ~~shares.~~Preferred Stock. The deemed dividend was a non-cash transaction and iswas reflected below net loss to arrive at net loss available to common stockholders on the ~~Company’s~~Company's condensed consolidated ~~statement~~statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2018.

In March 2019, the Company and Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. amended certain terms of the agreement, such that the conversion price was adjusted to $0.2775 per share. The Company determined that the amendment represented an immaterial modification.

~~As of March 31, 2018, there were 5,524,926 and 0 shares of convertible preferred stock were issued and outstanding at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.~~

Table of Contents

The preferred stock has been classified outside of ~~stockholders’~~stockholders' equity in accordance with authoritative guidance for the classification and measurement of potentially redeemable securities.

9. Stockholders' Equity

~~11.~~Common Stock

On May 18, 2018, the stockholders of Jaguar approved at the 2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company and the Board approved, in accordance with the authority granted by the Company's stockholders at the Annual Meeting, a 1‑for‑15 reverse stock split of the Company's issued and outstanding shares of common stock. On May 29, 2018, the Company filed the Certificate of Second Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to effect the Reverse Stock Split, effective June 1, 2018.

On May 18, 2018, the stockholders of the Company approved at the Annual Meeting a proposal to decrease the number of authorized shares of common stock to 150,000,000 shares, contingent upon the approval of the Reverse Stock Split. On June 1, 2018, the Company filed a certificate of third amendment (the “Third Amendment”) to its certificate of incorporation, (“COI”), with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware to decrease the total number of authorized shares of common stock so that the total number of the shares that the Company has authority to issue is 210,000,000 shares, of which 150,000,000 shares are common stock, 50,000,000 are non-voting common stock and 10,000,000 shares are “blank check” preferred stock.

As of March 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had reserved shares of common stock for issuance as follows:

March 31,

December 31,

2019

2018

(unaudited)

Options issued and outstanding

2,843,754

2,944,148
Inducement options issued and outstanding

208,865

208,865
Options available for grant under stock option plans

809,084

162,892
RSU awards issued and outstanding

392,904

392,904
Warrants issued and outstanding

5,027,495

2,427,653
Convertible notes

759,396

759,396
Preferred Convertible Stock

33,149,556

3,314,956
Total

43,191,054

10,210,814

10. Stock Incentive Plans

2013 Equity Incentive Plan

Effective November 1, 2013, the ~~Company’s~~Company's board of directors and sole stockholder adopted the Jaguar Health, Inc. 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2013 Plan”). The 2013 Plan allows the ~~Company’s~~Company's board of directors to grant stock options, restricted stock awards and restricted stock unit awards to employees, officers, directors and consultants of the Company. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had reserved 300,000 shares of its common stock for issuance under the 2013 Plan. In April 2014, the board of directors amended the 2013 Plan to increase the shares reserved for issuance to 847,533 shares. Following the effective date of the IPO and after effectiveness of any grants under the 2013 Plan that were contingent on the IPO, no additional stock awards will be granted under the 2013 Plan. Outstanding grants continue to be exercisable, however any unissued shares under the plan and any forfeitures of outstanding options do not rollover to the 2014 Stock Incentive Plan. ~~There~~As of March 31, 2019, there were ~~565,377 option shares outstanding at December 31, 2017.~~33,769 options outstanding.

2014 Stock Incentive Plan

~~Effective~~In May ~~12,~~ 2015, the Company adopted the Jaguar Health, Inc. 2014 Stock Incentive Plan (“2014 Plan”). The 2014 Plan provides for the grant of options, restricted stock and restricted stock units to eligible employees, directors and consultants to purchase the ~~Company’s~~Company's common stock. The Company reserved 333,333 shares of common stock for issuance pursuant to the 2014 Plan. On January 1, 2018, 2017 and 2016, the Company added 2,106,507, and 280,142, and 162,498 shares to the option pool in accordance with the 2014 Plan ~~that~~ provides for automatic share increases on the first

Table of Contents

day of each fiscal year in the amount of 2% of the outstanding number of shares of the ~~Company’s~~Company's common stock on last day of the preceding calendar year. The 2014 Plan ~~replaces~~replaced the 2013 Plan except that all outstanding options under the 2013 Plan remain outstanding until exercised, cancelled or ~~until they expire.~~

In July 2015, the Company amended the 2014 Plan reserving an additional 550,000 shares under the plan contingent upon approval by the Company’s stockholders at the June 2016 annual stockholders meeting. In June 2016, the Company amended the 2014 Plan once again, modifying the increase from 550,000 shares to 1,550,000 shares, which was approved at the 2016 annual stockholders meeting. In July 2017, the Company amended the 2014 Plan reserving an additional 6,500,188 shares under the plan, which was approved at the special stockholders meeting on July 27, 2017.expiration. As of March 31, 2019, there were 2,809,985 options outstanding and 809,084 options available for grant.

~~In March 2018, the Company amended the 2014 Plan reserving an additional 41,060,000 shares under the plan.~~

Stock Options and Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

The following table summarizes incentive plan activity for the ~~years~~three months ended March 31, ~~2018 and December 31, 2017:~~2019 (unaudited):

Weighted

Weighted Average

Aggregate

Shares

Average

Remaining

Intrinsic

Available

Stock Options

RSUs

Stock Option

Contractual Life

Value

for Grant

Outstanding

Outstanding

Exercise Price

(Years)

*

Combined Incentive Plan Balance—December 31, 2017

53,026

3,444,663

5,893,849

$
1.87

8.31

$
—

Additional shares authorized

43,166,507

Options granted

(12,767,961
)
12,767,961

Options cancelled

534,494

(566,570
)

Combined Incentive Plan Balance—March 31, 2018

30,986,066

15,646,054

5,893,849

$
0.84

1.65

$
51,247

Options vested and exercisable—March 31, 2018

1,615,043

$
3.06

3.06

$
49,927

Options vested and expected to vest—March 31, 2018

12,711,812

$
0.88

9.07

$
50,902


				Weighted		Weighted Average
	Shares	Stock		Average		Remaining	Aggregate
	Available	Options	RSUs	Stock Option		Contractual Life	Intrinsic
	for Grant	Outstanding	Outstanding	Exercise Price		(Years)	Value*
Outstanding at December 31, 2018	162,892	2,944,148	392,904	$	5.81	9.24	$	—
Additional shares authorized	545,797	—	—		—	—
Options granted	(4,800)	4,800	—		0.25	—		—
Options cancelled	105,195	(105,194)	—		5.36	—		—
Outstanding at March 31, 2019	809,084	2,843,754	392,904	$	6.01	9.00	$	—
Exercisable at March 31, 2019		1,130,584		$	8.95	8.82	$	—
Vested and expected to vest at March 31, 2019		2,789,671		$	6.01	9.00	$	—

*Fair market value of JAGX common stock on March ~~29 (31), 2018~~31, 2019 was ~~$0.195~~$0.28 per share.

The intrinsic value is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying options and the fair market value of the Company's common stock for options that were in-the-money.

The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options granted was ~~$0.17~~$0.25 and ~~$0.46~~$2.55 per share during the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017.~~

respectively.

The number of ~~option shares~~options that vested in the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 ~~and 2017~~ was ~~3,525,395~~523,602 shares and ~~185,005~~235,026 shares, respectively. The grant date weighted average fair value of ~~option shares~~options that vested in the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 was $1,870,671 and ~~2017 was~~ $251,060, ~~and $185,646,~~ respectively.

No options were exercised in the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017.~~

2018.

The ~~intrinsic value is computed as~~Company granted 209,531 inducement options in fiscal year 2018 to new employees. These options are all non-statutory and were issued outside of the ~~options granted multiplied by the difference between the~~Company’s 2014 Stock Plan. The weighted average grant-date fair ~~market~~ value of the ~~Company’s common stock of $0.195 on March 31, 2018 and the grant date stock option exercise price.~~options was $1.34 per share.

Table of Contents

Stock-Based Compensation

The following table summarizes stock-based compensation expense related to stock options, inducement stock options and RSUs for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, and are included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations ~~and comprehensive loss~~ as follows:


					Three Months Ended
	Three Months Ended				March 31,
	March 31,				2019		2018
	2018		2017			(unaudited)
Research and development expense	$	79,714	$	65,799	$	67,051	$	79,714
Sales and marketing expense	2,385		7,658			33,842		2,385
General and administrative expense	190,144		154,579			325,615		190,144
Total	$	272,243	$	228,036	$	426,508	$	272,243

As of March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company had ~~$1,922,627~~$2,308,797 of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense for options, inducement options and restricted stock units outstanding, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of ~~2.11~~1.62 years.

~~The estimated grant-date fair value of employee stock options was calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model using the following assumptions:~~

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

Weighted-average volatility

87.38-92.42%

74.26
%
Weighted-average expected term (years)

5.07-5.82

5.82

Risk-free interest rate

2.58-2.65%

1.98
%
Expected dividend yield

—

—

The estimated grant-date fair value of ~~non-employee~~ stock ~~options~~option grants was calculated using the ~~Black-Scholes-Merton~~Black-Scholes - Merton option-pricing model ~~was revalued~~ using the following weighted-average assumptions:


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
	(unaudited)
Weighted-average volatility	108.3 - 108.5	%	87.4 - 92.4	%
Weighted-average expected term (years)	5.81		5.1 - 5.8
Risk-free interest rate	2.5 - 2.6	%	2.6 - 2.7	%
Expected dividend yield	—		—

401(k) Plan

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

Weighted-average volatility

85.29-89.5%

—

Weighted-average expected term (years)

9.55-9.75

—

Risk-free interest rate

2.63-2.86%

—

Expected dividend yield

—

—

The Company sponsors a 401(k) defined contribution plan covering all employees. There were no employer contributions to the plan from plan inception through December 31, 2018.

~~12.~~11. Net Loss Per Share Attributable to Common Stockholders

The following table presents the calculation of basic and diluted net ~~loss~~income (loss) per share of common ~~share~~stock for the ~~three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017:~~periods indicated:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,			March 31,			Three Months Ended
	2018			2017			March 31,
Net loss attributable to common shareholders	$	(6,691,637	)	$	(4,715,358	)
							2019		2018
								(unaudited)
Net loss attributable to common shareholders (basic and diluted)							$	(8,303,871)	$	(6,691,637)
Shares used to compute net loss per common share, basic and diluted	129,467,132			14,157,351				34,524,145		8,631,142
Net loss per share attributable to common shareholders, basic and diluted	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.33	)	$	(0.24)	$	(0.75)

Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted-average

Table of Contents

number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding for the period. Common stock equivalents are only included when their effect is dilutive. The ~~Company’s~~Company's potentially dilutive securities which include stock options, convertible preferred stock and common stock warrants have been excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as they would be anti-dilutive. For all periods presented, there is no difference in the number of shares used to compute basic and diluted shares outstanding due to the ~~Company’s~~Company's net loss position.

The following outstanding common stock equivalents have been excluded from diluted net loss per common share for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017~~2018 because their inclusion would be ~~anti-dilutive:~~anti-dilutive.


	March 31,	March 31,
	2019	2018
	(unaudited)
Options issued and outstanding	2,843,754	1,043,070
Inducement options issued and outstanding	208,865	—
Warrants to purchase common stock	5,027,495	321,335
Restricted stock units	392,904	392,923
Convertible preferred stock	33,149,556	3,314,956
Convertible debt	759,396	759,396
Total	42,381,970	5,831,680

March 31,

March 31,

2018

2017

Options issued and outstanding

15,646,054

2,528,650

Warrants to purchase common stock

4,820,025

6,339,792

Restricted stock units

5,893,849

20,789

Total

26,359,928

8,889,231

~~13. Income Taxes~~

12. Segment Information

Prior to the merger with Napo, the Company managed its operations as a single segment for the purposes of assessing performance and making operating decisions. The Company reorganized its segments to reflect the change in the organizational structure resulting from the merger with Napo. Post-merger, the Company manages its operations through two reportable segments—human health and animal health. The human health segment is focused on developing and commercializing human products and the ongoing commercialization of Mytesi™, which is approved by the U.S. FDA for the symptomatic relief of noninfectious diarrhea in adults with HIV/AIDS on antiretroviral therapy. The animal health segment is focused on developing and commercializing prescription and non-prescription products for companion and production animals.

The ~~forecasted effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2018~~Company's reportable segments net revenues and ~~2017 was zero percent, primarily as a result of the estimated tax~~net loss ~~for the year and the change in valuation allowance.~~consisted of:


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018
		(unaudited)
Revenue from external customers
Human Health	$	1,543,121	$	583,269
Animal Health		46,612		43,698
Consolidated Totals	$	1,589,733	$	626,967

Segment profit (loss)
Human Health	$	(5,511,092)	$	(2,899,306)
Animal Health		(2,792,779)		(2,797,331)
Consolidated Totals	$	(8,303,871)	$	(5,696,637)

~~14. 401(k) Plan~~

Table of Contents

13. Subsequent Events

The Company ~~sponsors~~completed an evaluation of the impact of subsequent events through May 20, 2019, the date these condensed consolidated financial statements were issued.

Oasis Equity Line

On April 1, 2019, the Company entered into another common stock purchase agreement (the “April CSPA”) with Oasis Capital relating to an offering (the “April Equity Line Offering”) of an aggregate of up to 20,000,000 shares (the “April Purchase Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, all of which are being offered in a ~~401(k) defined contribution plan covering all employees. There were no employer contributions~~primary offering consisting of an equity line of credit. Under the terms of the April CSPA, the Company has the right to “put,” or sell, the April Purchase Shares to Oasis Capital for an amount equal to the ~~plan from plan inception through March 31, 2018.~~

~~15. Subsequent Events~~

Inproduct of (i) the number of April Purchase Shares set forth in the applicable put notice (minus the deposit and clearing fees associated with such purchase) and (ii) a fixed price of ~~2018,~~$0.28 per share or such other price agreed upon between the Company ~~issued 2,034,082~~and Oasis Capital. The Company had the option to increase the equity line of credit by an additional 20,000,000 shares of common Stock by notifying Oasis Capital at any time after the effective date of the April CSPA.

Proposed Registered Offering

On May 10, 2019, the Company filed a Registration Statement under the Securities Act of 1933 on Form S-1 with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) related to a proposed offering of its common stock and warrants up to a proposed maximum aggregate offering price of $10.0 million dollars. All shares to be sold in ~~exchange~~the Offering are proposed to be sold by the Company. The Title of the Class of Securities to be registered is as follows: (i) Class A units consisting of Shares of common Stock, par value $.00001 per share, and Warrants to purchase common stock; (ii) Class B units consisting of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.0001 per share, and common stock issuable upon conversion of Series B Preferred Stock and Warrants to Purchase common stock. The number of shares to be offered and the price range for ~~$203,000~~the offering have not yet been determined. Ladenburg Thalmann is the sole book-running manager.

A registration relating to these securities has been filed with the SEC but has not yet become effective.

Nasdaq Communication

On May 13, 2019, the Company received written notice from the Staff of ~~proceeds~~the Listing Qualifications Department (the “Staff”) of The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq”) indicating that, based upon the Company’s continued non-compliance with the minimum $1.00 bid price requirement for continued listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market, as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5550(a)(2) (the “Rule”), as of May 8, 2019, and notwithstanding the Company’s compliance with the quantitative criteria necessary to obtain a second 180-day period within which ~~were used~~ to ~~pay off~~evidence compliance with the ~~$150,000 principal balance~~Rule, as set forth in Nasdaq Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(A), the Staff had determined to delist the Company’s securities from Nasdaq unless the Company timely requests a hearing before the Nasdaq Hearings Panel (the “Panel”).

The Company intends to timely request a hearing before the Panel, at which hearing the Company will request an extension within which to evidence compliance with all applicable requirements for continued listing on Nasdaq, including compliance with the Rule. The Company’s request for a hearing will stay any suspension or delisting action by the Staff at least pending the ultimate outcome of the hearing. The Company intends to take definitive steps in an effort to evidence compliance with the Rule; however, there can be no assurance that the Panel will grant the Company’s request for continued listing or that the Company will be able to evidence compliance with the Rule within any extension period that may be granted by the Panel.

The Staff’s determination follows the Company’s prior disclosure regarding its receipt of written notice from the Staff dated November 9, 2018, indicating that, because the Company’s bid price had closed below the minimum $1.00 per share threshold for the previous 30-business day period and ~~$53,000~~in accordance with the Nasdaq Listing Rules, the

Table of ~~unpaid accrued interest~~Contents

Company had been provided a 180-day grace period, through May 8, 2019, to evidence compliance with the Rule. The Staff’s prior correspondence further indicated that the Company may be eligible for a second 180-day grace period so long as the Company satisfied the continued listing requirement for market value of publicly held shares and all other requirements for initial listing on The Nasdaq Capital Market, with the ~~February 2015 convertible debt.~~exception of the bid price requirement, upon the expiration of the first grace period and the Company provided written notice of its intention to cure the deficiency during the second compliance period by effecting a reverse stock split if necessary. The Company satisfied the quantitative requirements to obtain a second 180-day grace period and submitted the requisite notice to the Staff; however, the Staff determined, based on its exercise of discretion, not to grant the Company a second 180-day grace period.

Table of Contents

Item 2. ~~Management’s~~Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read together with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in Item 1 of Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form ~~10-Q,~~10‑Q, and with our audited consolidated financial statements and the related notes included in our Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10‑K for the year ended December 31, ~~2017.~~2018.

The discussion and analysis below includes certain forward-looking statements related to our research and development and commercialization of our products in the U.S., our future financial condition and results of operations and potential for profitability, the sufficiency of our cash resources, our ability to obtain additional equity or debt financing, if needed, possible partnering or other strategic opportunities for the development of our products, as well as other statements related to the progress and timing of product development, present or future licensing, collaborative or financing arrangements or that otherwise relate to future periods, which are all forward-looking statements as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements represent, among other things, the expectations, beliefs, plans and objectives of management and/or assumptions underlying or judgments concerning the future financial performance and other matters discussed in this document. The words “may,” “will,” “should,” “plan,” “believe,” “estimate,” “intend,” “anticipate,” “project,” and “expect” and similar expressions are intended to connote forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements involve certain risks, uncertainties and other factors described in our Annual Report on Form ~~10-K,~~10‑K, that could cause our actual commercialization efforts, financial condition and results of operations, and business prospects and opportunities to differ materially from these expressed in, or implied by, those forward-looking statements. We caution investors not to place significant reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report. These statements, like all statements in this report, speak only as of the date of this report (unless another date is indicated), and we undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements.

Overview

We are a commercial stage ~~natural-products~~ pharmaceuticals company focused on developing novel, sustainably derived gastrointestinal products on a global basis. Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Napo”), focuses on developing and commercializing proprietary human gastrointestinal pharmaceuticals for the global marketplace from plants used traditionally in rainforest areas. Our Mytesi (crofelemer) product is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for the symptomatic relief of noninfectious diarrhea in adults with HIV/AIDS on antiretroviral therapy. In the field of animal health, we are focused on developing and commercializing first-in-class gastrointestinal products for companion and production animals, foals, and high value horses.

Jaguar was founded in San Francisco, California as a Delaware corporation on June 6, 2013. Napo formed Jaguar to develop and commercialize animal health products. Effective as of December 31, 2013, Jaguar was a wholly-owned subsidiary of Napo, and ~~until May 13, 2015,~~ Jaguar was a majority-owned subsidiary of ~~Napo.~~Napo until the close of the Company's initial public offering on May 18, 2015. On July 31, 2017, the merger of Jaguar Animal Health, Inc. and Napo became effective, at which point Jaguar Animal ~~Health’s~~Health's name changed to Jaguar Health, Inc. and Napo began operating as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jaguar focused on human health and the ongoing commercialization of, and development of follow-on indications for, Mytesi.

~~With the merger effective, we~~We believe ~~that our newly combined company~~Jaguar is poised to realize a number of synergistic, value adding benefits—and an expanded pipeline of potential blockbuster human follow-on indications, a second-generation anti-secretory agent, as well as a pipeline of important animal indications for crofelemer, upon which to build global partnerships. As previously announced, Jaguar, through Napo, now controls commercial rights for Mytesi for all indications, territories and patient populations globally, and crofelemer manufacturing is being conducted at a ~~new,~~ multimillion-dollar commercial manufacturing facility that has been FDA-inspected and approved. Additionally, several of the drug product candidates in ~~Jaguar’s~~Jaguar's Mytesi pipeline are backed by strong Phase 2 evidence from completed Phase 2 trials.

Table of Contents

Mytesi is a novel, first-in-class anti-secretory agent which has a basic normalizing effect locally on the gut, and this mechanism of action has the potential to benefit multiple disorders. Mytesi is in development for multiple possible follow-on indications, including cancer therapy-related diarrhea; orphan-drug indications for infants and children with congenital diarrheal disorders and short bowel syndrome (SBS); supportive care for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); irritable bowel syndrome (IBS); and as a second-generation anti-secretory agent for use in cholera patients. Mytesi has received orphan-drug designation for SBS.

Financial Operations Overview

We were incorporated in June 2013 in Delaware. Napo formed our company to develop and commercialize animal health products. Prior to our incorporation, the only activities of Napo related to animal health were limited to the retention of consultants to evaluate potential strategic alternatives. We were previously a majority-owned subsidiary of Napo. However, following the closing of our May 2015 initial public offering, we are no longer majority-owned by Napo.

On July 31, 2017, Jaguar Animal Health, Inc., or Jaguar, completed a merger with Napo pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 31, 2017 by and among Jaguar, Napo, Napo Acquisition Corporation (“Merger Sub”), and Napo’s representative (the “Merger Agreement”). In accordance with the terms of the Merger Agreement, upon the completion of the merger, Merger Sub merged with and into Napo, with Napo surviving as our wholly-owned subsidiary. Immediately following the Napo Merger, Jaguar changed its name from “Jaguar Animal Health, Inc.” to “Jaguar Health, Inc.” Napo now operates as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Jaguar focused on human health and the ongoing commercialization of Mytesi, a Napo drug product approved by the U.S. FDA for the symptomatic relief of noninfectious diarrhea in adults with HIV/AIDS on antiretroviral therapy.

On a consolidated basis, we have not yet generated enough revenue to date to achieve break even or positive cash flow, and we expect to continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses. Our net loss was $8.3 million and ~~comprehensive loss was $5,696,637 and $4,715,358~~$5.7 million for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. As of March 31, ~~2018,~~2019, we had a total ~~stockholders’~~stockholders' equity of ~~$30,007,647,~~$6.8 million, an accumulated deficit of ~~$68,101,359,~~$102.9 million, and cash ~~and cash equivalents~~ of ~~$7,808,324.~~$2.6 million. We expect to continue to incur losses and experience increased expenditures for the foreseeable future as we expand our product development activities, seek necessary approvals for our product candidates, conduct species-specific formulation studies for our non-prescription products, establish API manufacturing capabilities and begin additional commercialization activities.

~~Revenue Recognition~~

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), which was adopted on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method, which was elected to apply to all contracts. Application of the modified retrospective method did not impact amounts previously reported by the Company, nor did it require a cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption, as the Company’s method of recognizing revenue under ASC 606 was similar to the method utilized immediately prior to adoption. Accordingly, there is no need for the Company to dislose the amount by which each financial statement line item was affected as a result of applying the new revenue standard and an explanation of significant changes.

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with the core principal of ASC 606 or when there is a transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.

~~Contracts~~

Napo has a Marketing and Distribution Agreement (“M&D Agreement”) with BexR Logistix, LLC (“BexR” or “Mission Pharmacal” or “Mission”), in April 2016 to appoint BexR as its distributor with the right to market and sell, and the exclusive right to distribute Mytesi (formerly Fulyzaq) in US. The term of the M&D Agreement is 4 years. The M&D Agreement will renew automatically for successive one year terms unless either party provides a written notice of termination not less than 90 days prior to the expiration of the initial or subsequent terms. Napo retains control of Mytesi held at Mission.

Napo sells Mytesi through Mission, who then sells Mytesi to its distributors and wholesalers — McKesson, Cardinal Health, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation (“ABC”), HD Smith, Smith Drug and Publix (together “Distributors”). Mission sells Mytesi to their Distributors, on behalf of Napo, under agreements executed by Mission with these Distributors and Napo abides by the terms and conditions of sales agreed between Mission and their Distributors. Health care providers order Mytesi through pharmacies who obtain Mytesi through Mission’s Distributors. Napo considers the Distributors of Mission as its customers.

Mission’s Distributors are the customers of the Company with respect to purchase of Mytesi. The M&D Agreement with Mission, Mission’s agreement with its Distributors and the related purchase order will together meet the contract existence criteria under ASC 606-10-25-1.

Jaguar’s Neonorm and Botanical extract products are primarily sold to distributors, who then sell the products to the end customers. Since 2014, the Company has entered into several distribution agreements with established distributors such as Animart, Vedco, VPI, RJ Matthews, Henry Schein, and Stockmen Supply to distribute the Company’s products in the United States, Japan, and China. The distribution agreements and the related purchase order together meet the contract existence criteria under ASXC 606-10-25-1.

~~Performance obligations~~

For the products sold by each of Napo and Jaguar, the single performance obligation identified above is Company’s promise to transfer the Company’s product Mytesi to Distributors based on specified payment and shipping terms in the arrangement.

~~Transaction price~~

For both Jaugar and Napo, the transaction price is the amount of consideration to which the Company expects to collect in exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. The transaction price of Mytesi and Neonorm is the Wholesaler Aquistion Cost (“WAC”), net of variable considerations and price adjustments.

~~Allocate transaction price~~

~~For both Napo and Jaguar, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligaton contained in each contract.~~

~~Point in time recognition~~

~~For both Napo and Jaguar, a single performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time, upon the FOB terms of each contract when~~ ~~control, including title and all risks, has transferred to the customer.~~

~~Disaggregation of Product Revenue~~

~~Human~~

Sales of Mytesi are recognized as revenue when the products are delivered to the wholesalers. Revenues from the sale of Mytesi were $583,269 and $0 in the three months ended March 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company recorded a reserve for estimated product returns under terms of agreements with wholesalers based on its historical returns experience. Reserves for returns at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were immaterial. If actual returns differed from our historical experience, changes to the reserved could be required in future periods.

~~Animal~~

The Company recognized Neonorm revenues of $43,698 and $44,544 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and Botanical Extract revenues of $0 and $30,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Revenues are recognized when title has transferred to the buyer. Sales of Neonorm Calf and Foal to distributors are made under agreements that may provide distributor price adjustments and rights of return under certain circumstances. Reserves for returns are analyzed periodically and are estimated based on historical return data. Reserves for returns and price adjustments at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 were immaterial. Sales of Botanical Extract are recognized as revenue when the product is delivered to the customer which do not provide for return rights.

~~Collaboration Revenue~~

On January ~~27, 2017, the Company~~7, 2019, Jaguar entered into a ~~licensing, development, co-promotion and commercialization~~common stock purchase agreement with ~~Elanco US Inc. (“Elanco”)~~Oasis Capital, relating to ~~license, develop and commercialize Canalevia, the Company’s drug product candidate under investigation for treatment~~an offering of ~~acute and chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in dogs, and other drug product formulations~~an aggregate of ~~crofelemer for treatment~~up to 5,333,333 shares of ~~gastrointestinal diseases, conditions and symptoms in cats and other companion animals.~~common Stock via an equity line of credit. Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company ~~received~~has the right to "put," or sell, up to 5,333,333 shares of common stock to Oasis Capital for an initial upfront payment of $2,548,689, inclusive of reimbursement of past product and development expenses of $1,048,689, which was recognized as revenue ratably over the estimated development period of one year resulting in $177,389 and $459,700 in collaboration revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In additionamount equal to the ~~upfront payments, Elanco reimbursed~~product of (i) the number of shares set forth on the applicable put notice (minus the deposit and clearing fees associated with such purchase) and (ii) a fixed price of $0.75 per share or such other price agreed upon between the Company ~~for $0~~ and ~~$288,166 in~~Oasis Capital. Jaguar had the ~~three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 for certain development and regulatory expenses related~~option to increase the ~~planned target animal safety study and the completion~~equity line of ~~the Canalevia field study for acute diarrhea in dogs which were also included in collaboration revenue.~~

~~On November 1, 2017, the Company received a letter from Elanco serving as formal notice~~credit by an additional 8,000,000 shares of ~~their decision to terminate the agreement~~common stock by ~~giving the Company 90 days written notice. According to the agreement, termination became effective on January 30, 2018, which is 90 days~~notifying Oasis Capital at any time after ~~the date of the Notice. On~~ the effective date of ~~termination~~the purchase agreement. In March 2019, Jaguar exercised this option. As of March 31, 2019, the Company had sold all of the ~~Elanco Agreement,~~5,333,333 shares of common stock of the equity line and all ~~licenses granted~~8,000,000 shares of common stock from the option to ~~Elanco by~~Oasis Capital.

Between January through March 31, 2019, Jaguar entered into exchange agreements with Chicago Venture Partners L.P., pursuant to which the Company ~~under the Elanco Agreement were revoked and the rights granted thereunder reverted back~~issued to ~~the Company. Provisions~~CVP 18,764,637 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $6.1 million, in exchange for a reduction of approximately $4.4 million in the ~~agreement providing~~principal amount of the CVP Promissory Notes and $1.7 million in accrued interest thereon.

In March 2019, Jaguar began entering into securities purchase agreements with selected accredited investors, pursuant to which the Company intends to issue up to $5.5 million aggregate principal amount of promissory notes to such Investors. As an inducement for entering into the ~~receipt~~Securities Purchase Agreement, each investor will also receive warrants exercisable for shares of ~~additional payments upon achievement~~the Company’s common stock. As of ~~certain development, regulatory and sales milestones in~~March 31, 2019, two Notes with an aggregate ~~amount~~principal of up$800,000 had been issued.

In March 2019, Jaguar entered into a securities purchase agreement with Oasis Capital pursuant to ~~$61.0~~which Jaguar agreed to issue and sell, in a registered public offering by Jaguar directly to Oasis, an aggregate of 1,331,332 shares of common stock at an offering price of $0.20 for gross proceeds of approximately $266,266.

In March 2019, Jaguar issued 1,382,636 shares of common stock in lieu of a cash payment of $0.4 million ~~payable throughout the term~~in interest expense on notes payable.

Revenues

Our product and collaboration revenue consist of the ~~Elanco Agreement, as well as product development expense reimbursement~~following:

Revenues from the sale of our human drug Mytesi, which is sold through distributors and wholesalers.

Table of Contents

Revenues from the sale of our animal products branded as Neonorm Calf and Neonorm Foal. Our Neonorm and Botanical extract products are primarily sold to distributors, who then sell the products to the end customers.

Revenues from our collaborative agreement with Elanco to license, develop and commercialize Canalevia. This agreement was terminated in January 2018.

See “Results of Operations” below for ~~any additional product development expenses incurred, and royalty payments~~more detailed discussion on ~~global sales terminated on termination of the agreement.~~

~~Cost of Product Revenue~~revenues

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue consists of direct drug substance and drug product revenue expenses consist of costs to manufacture, package and distribute Neonorm related to those products that prior to December 2017 distributors have sold through to their customers, and beginning December 2017 products sold to distributorsmaterials expense, direct labor, distribution fees, royalties and other ~~customers. Cost of product revenue also includes charges~~related expenses associated with ~~inventory reserves.~~the sale of our products.

Research and Development Expense

Research and development expenses consist primarily of clinical and contract manufacturing expense, personnel and related benefit expense, stock-based compensation expense, employee travel expense, and reforestation expenses. Clinical and contract manufacturing expense consists primarily of costs to conduct stability, safety and efficacy studies, and manufacturing startup expenses at an outsourced API provider in Italy.

We typically use our employee and infrastructure resources across multiple development programs. We track outsourced development costs by prescription drug product candidate and non-prescription product but do not allocate personnel or other internal costs related to development to specific programs or development compounds.

The timing and amount of our research and development expenses will depend largely upon the outcomes of current and future trials for our prescription drug product candidates as well as the related regulatory requirements, the outcomes of current and future species-specific formulation studies for our non-prescription products, manufacturing costs and any costs associated with the advancement of our line extension programs. We cannot determine with certainty the duration and completion costs of the current or future development activities.

The duration, costs and timing of trials, formulation studies and development of our prescription drug and non-prescription products will depend on a variety of factors, including:

· ~~the scope, rate of progress, and expense of our ongoing, as well as any additional clinical trials, formulation studies and other research and development activities;~~

· ~~future clinical trial and formulation study results;~~

· ~~potential changes in government regulations; and~~

· ~~the timing and receipt of any regulatory approvals.~~

the scope, rate of progress, and expense of our ongoing, as well as any additional clinical trials, formulation studies and other research and development activities;

future clinical trial and formulation study results;

potential changes in government regulations; and

the timing and receipt of any regulatory approvals.

A change in the outcome of any of these variables with respect to the development of a prescription drug product candidate or non-prescription product could mean a significant change in the costs and timing associated with our development activities.

We expect research and development expense to increase significantly as we add personnel, commence additional clinical studies and other activities to develop our prescription drug product candidates and non-prescription products.

Table of Contents

Sales and Marketing Expense

Sales and marketing expenses consist of personnel and related benefit expense, stock-based compensation expense, direct sales and marketing expense, employee travel expense, and management consulting expense. We currently incur sales and marketing expenses to promote Mytesi and Neonorm calf and foal sales.

We expect sales and marketing expense to increase significantly as we develop and commercialize new products and grow our existing Mytesi and Neonorm markets. We will need to add sales and marketing headcount to promote the sales of existing and new products.

General and Administrative Expense

General and administrative expenses consist of personnel and related benefit expense, stock-based compensation expense, employee travel expense, legal and accounting fees, rent and facilities expense, and management consulting expense.

We expect general and administrative expense to increase in order to enable us to effectively manage the overall growth of the business. This will include adding headcount, enhancing information systems and potentially expanding corporate facilities.

Interest Expense

Interest expense consists primarily of non-cash and cash interest costs related to our borrowings.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP, requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those accounting policies that may be material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change, and that have a material impact on ~~convertible promissory notes, promisorry notes,~~financial condition or operating performance. While we base our estimates and judgments on our experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements require significant judgments and estimates. For additional information relating to these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements and the ~~loan~~related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10‑K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), which was adopted on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method, which was elected to apply to all active contracts as of the adoption date. Application of the modified retrospective method did not impact amounts previously reported by the Company, nor did it require a cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption, as the Company's method of recognizing revenue under ASC 606 yielded similar results to the method utilized immediately prior to adoption. Accordingly, there was no effect to each financial statement line item as a result of applying the new revenue standard.

Practical Expedients, Elections, and ~~security agreement (long-term debt arrangement).~~ Exemptions

We recognize revenue in accordance with the core principal of ASC 606 or when there is a transfer of control of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services.

Table of Contents

We used a practical expedient available under ASC 606‑10‑65‑1(f)4 that permits us to consider the aggregate effect of all contract modifications that occurred before the beginning of the earliest period presented when identifying satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations, transaction price, and allocating the transaction price to the satisfied and unsatisfied performance obligations.

We also used a practical expedient available under ASC 606‑10‑32‑18 that permits us not to adjust the amount of consideration for the effects of a significant financing component if, at contract inception, the expected period between the transfer of promised goods or services and customer payment is one year or less.

We have elected to treat shipping and handling activities as fulfillment costs.

Additionally, we have elected to record revenue net of sales and other similar taxes.

Contracts

Effective January 16, 2019, Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. engaged Cardinal Health as its exclusive third party logistics distribution agent for commercial sales for the Company’s Mytesi product and to perform certain other services which include, ~~accretion of debt issuance costs, debt discount amortization~~without limitation, storage, distribution, returns, customer support, financial support, EDI and system access support (Exclusive Distribution Agreement) .

In addition to the ~~accretion of an end-of-term long-term debt payment in interest expense in the statements of operations~~terms and ~~comprehensive loss.~~

~~Results of Operations~~

~~Comparison~~conditions of the ~~three months ended March 31, 2018~~Agreement, Cardinal Health’s purchase of products, and ~~2017~~

~~The following table summarizes the Company’s results~~assumption of ~~operations with respect to the items~~title therein, is set forth in ~~such table~~the Title Model Addendum. The Title Model Addendum states that upon receipt of product at the 3PL Facility (Cardinal Health in La Vergne, Tennessee) from the Company, title and risk of loss for the ~~three months ended March 31, 2018~~Mytesi product purchased by Cardinal Health (excluding consigned inventory) shall pass to Cardinal Health, and ~~2017~~title and risk of loss for consigned inventory shall remain with Client until purchased by Cardinal Health in accordance with this Addendum. Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. considers Cardinal Health the Company’s exclusive customer for Mytesi products per the Cardinal Health Exclusive Distribution agreement.

Our Neonorm and Botanical extract products are primarily sold to distributors, who then sell the products to the end customers. Since 2014, we entered into several distribution agreements with established distributors such as Animart, Vedco, VPI, RJ Matthews, Henry Schein, and Stockmen Supply to distribute the Company's products in the United States, Japan, and China. The distribution agreements and the related purchase order together ~~with~~meet the ~~change~~contract existence criteria under ASC 606‑10‑25‑1. Jaguar sells directly to its customers without the use of an agent.

Performance obligations

For the products sold by each of Napo and Jaguar, the single performance obligation identified above is our promise to transfer our Mytesi product to Distributors based on specified payment and shipping terms in ~~such items~~the arrangement. Product warranties are assurance type warranties that does not represent a performance obligation.

Transaction price

For both Jaguar and our Napo subsidiary, the transaction price is the amount of consideration to which we expect to collect in ~~dollars~~exchange for transferring promised goods or services to a customer. The transaction price of Mytesi and ~~as a percentage:~~Neonorm is the Wholesaler Acquisition Cost (“WAC”), net of discounts, returns, and price adjustments.

Allocate transaction price

For both Jaguar and our Napo subsidiary, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligation contained in each contract.

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

Variance

Variance %

Product revenue

$
626,967

$
74,544

$
552,423

741.1
%
Collaboration revenue

177,389

747,866

(570,477
)
(76.3
)%
Total revenue

804,356

822,410

(18,054
)
(2.2
)%
Operating Expenses

Cost of revenue

464,161

16,145

448,016

2775.0
%
Research and development expense

757,866

1,255,452

(497,586
)
(39.6
)%
Sales and marketing expense

1,712,190

122,912

1,589,278

1293.0
%
General and administrative expense

2,998,400

3,303,503

(305,103
)
(9.2
)%
Total operating expenses

5,932,617

4,698,012

1,234,605

26.3
%
Loss from operations

(5,128,261
)
(3,875,602
)
(1,252,659
)
(32.3
)%
Interest expense, net

(602,022
)
(180,072
)
(421,950
)
(234.3
)%
Other income

297,500

1,448

296,052

20445.6
%
Change in fair value of warrants

(263,854
)
(453,419
)
189,565

41.8
%
Loss on extinguishment of debt

—

(207,713
)
207,713

100.0
%
Net loss and comprehensive loss

(5,696,637
)
(4,715,358
)
(981,279
)
(20.8
)%
Deemed dividend attributable to preferred stock

(995,000
)
—

(995,000
)
N/A

Net loss attributable to common shareholders

$
(6,691,637
)
$
(4,715,358
)
$
(1,976,279
)
(41.9
)%

Table of Contents

~~Revenue~~Point in time recognition

For both Jaguar and ~~Cost~~our Napo subsidiary, a single performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time, upon the FOB terms of ~~Revenue~~each contract when control, including title and all risks, has transferred to the customer.

Disaggregation of Product Revenue

~~Product revenue~~

Our product revenue of $626,967 and related cost of revenue of $464,161 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 reflects revenue from the sale of our human drug Mytesi, our animal products branded as Neonorm Calf and Neonorm Foal and botanical extract. Product revenues of $74,544 and related cost of revenue of $16,145 only includes the sale of our branded animal products.

Human

Sales of Mytesi are recognized as revenue when the products are delivered to the ~~wholesalers. Revenues~~Cardinal wholesaler. Net revenues from the sale of Mytesi were ~~$583,269~~$1,543,121 and $0 in the three months ended March 2018 and 2017, respectively. We recorded a reserve for estimated product returns under terms of agreements with wholesalers based on its historical returns experience. Reserves for returns at March 31, 2018 were immaterial. If actual returns differed from our historical experience, changes to the reserved could be required in future periods.

~~Animal~~

~~We recognized Neonorm revenues of $43,698 and $44,544~~$583,269 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, ~~and 2017, respectively, and Botanical Extract~~respectively.

Animal

The Company recognized Neonorm revenues of $0$46,612 and ~~$30,000 in~~$43,698 for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017,~~2018, respectively. Revenues are recognized upon shipment which is when title ~~has~~and control is transferred to the buyer. Sales of Neonorm Calf and Foal to distributors are made under agreements that may provide distributor price adjustments and rights of return under certain circumstances. ~~Reserves~~

Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill

Goodwill is tested for ~~returns are analyzed periodically~~impairment on an annual basis and ~~are estimated~~in-between annual tests if events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have occurred. The test is based on ~~historical return data.~~ a comparison of the reporting unit's book value to its estimated fair market value. We perform the annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year using the opening condensed consolidated balance sheet as of the first day of the fourth quarter, with any resulting impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.If the carrying value of a reporting unit's net assets exceeds its fair value, the goodwill would be considered impaired and would be reduced to its fair value.

Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets

Acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D) are intangible assets initially recognized at fair value and classified as indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. During the development period, these assets will not be amortized as charges to earnings; instead these assets will be tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if impairment indicators are identified. In connection with each annual impairment assessment and any interim impairment assessment in which indicators of impairment have been identified, we compare the fair value of the asset as of the date of the assessment with the carrying value of the asset on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. If impairment is indicated by this test, the intangible asset is written down by the amount by which the discounted cash flows expected from the intangible asset exceeds its carrying value.

Accrued Research and Development Expenses

As part of the process of preparing our condensed consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate accrued research and development expenses. Estimated accrued expenses include fees paid to vendors and clinical sites in connection with our clinical trials and studies. We review new and open contracts and communicate with applicable internal and vendor personnel to identify services that have been performed on our behalf and estimate the level of service performed and the associated costs incurred for the service when we have not yet been invoiced or otherwise notified of the actual cost for accrued expenses. The majority of our service providers invoice us monthly in arrears for services performed or as milestones are achieved in relation to our contract manufacturers. We make estimates of our accrued expenses as of each reporting date.

Table of Contents

We base our accrued expenses related to clinical trials and studies on our estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to contracts with vendors, our internal resources, and payments to clinical sites based on enrollment projections. The financial terms of the vendor agreements are subject to negotiation, vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. Payments under some of these contracts depend on factors such as the successful enrollment of animals and the completion of development milestones. We estimate the time period over which services will be performed and the level of effort to be expended in each period. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from our estimate, we adjust the related expense accrual accordingly on a prospective basis. If we do not identify costs that have been incurred or if we underestimate or overestimate the level of services performed or the costs of these services, our actual expenses could differ from our estimates. To date, we have not made any material adjustments to our estimates of accrued research and development expenses or the level of services performed in any reporting period presented.

The Company expenses the total cost of a certain long-term manufacturing development contract ratably over the estimated life of the contract, or the total amount paid if greater.

Results of Operations

Comparison of the Three Months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018


	March 31,
	2019		2018		Variance		Variance %
Product revenue, net	$	1,589,733	$	626,967	$	962,766	154	%
Collaboration revenue		—		177,389		(177,389)	(100)	%
Total revenue		1,589,733		804,356		785,377	98%	%
Operating Expenses
Cost of revenue		864,943		464,161		400,782	86	%
Research and development expense		1,421,360		757,866		663,494	88	%
Sales and marketing expense		1,565,124		1,712,190		(147,066)	(9)	%
General and administrative expense		3,513,414		2,998,400		515,014	17	%
Total operating expenses		7,364,841		5,932,617		1,432,224	24	%
Loss from operations		(5,775,108)		(5,128,261)		(646,847)	13	%
Interest expense		(547,130)		(602,022)		54,892	(9)	%
Other income, net		6,384		297,500		(291,116)	(98)	%
Change in fair value of warrant, derivative liability and conversion option liability		(46,057)		(263,854)		217,797	(83)	%
Loss on extinguishment of debt		(1,941,960)		—		(1,941,960)	(100)	%
Net loss		(8,303,871)		(5,696,637)		(2,607,234)	46	%
Deemed dividend attributable to preferred stockholders		—		(995,000)		995,000	(100)	%
Net loss attributable to common stockholders	$	(8,303,871)	$	(6,691,637)	$	(1,612,234)	24	%

Table of Contents

Revenue

Gross sales and allowances

Due to the Company’s arrangements, including elements of variable consideration, gross product sales are reduced in order to reflect the expected consideration to arrive at net product sales. Deductions to reduce gross product sales to net product sales in the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018		Variance		Variance %
Gross product sales
Mytesi	$	2,143,513	$	795,740	$	1,347,773	169	%
Neonorm		46,612		43,698		2,914	7	%
Total gross product sales		2,190,125		839,438		1,350,687	161	%
Medicare rebates		(115,820)		—		(115,820)	100	%
Sales discounts - Mytesi		(347,449)		(107,045)		(240,404)	225	%
Sales returns - Mytesi		(32,146)		(30,020)		(2,126)	7	%
Wholesaler fee - Mytesi		(104,977)		(75,406)		(29,571)	39	%
Net product sales	$	1,589,733	$	626,967	$	962,766	154	%

Product revenue

Our gross product revenue of $2,190,125 and $839,438 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively, reflects revenue from the sale of our human drug Mytesi and our animal products branded as Neonorm Calf and Neonorm Foal.

Human

Sales of ~~Botanical Extract~~Mytesi are recognized as revenue when the ~~product is~~products are delivered to the ~~customer which do not provide~~wholesalers. Our gross revenues from the sale of Mytesi were $2,143,513 and $795,740 in the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Animal

We recognized Neonorm revenues of $46,612 and $43,698 for ~~return rights.~~the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Collaboration Revenue

Collaboration ~~Revenue~~

Onrevenue is derived from our January ~~27,~~ 2017 ~~we entered into a~~ licensing, development, co-promotion and commercialization agreement with Elanco US Inc. to license, develop and commercialize ~~Canalevia,~~Canalevia. Elanco terminated the ~~Company’s drug product candidate under investigation for treatment of acute~~arrangement in January 2018 and chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in dogs, and other drug product formulations of crofelemer for treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, conditions and symptoms in cats and other companion animals. Under the terms of the agreement, we received an initial upfront payment of $2,548,689, inclusive of reimbursement of past product and development expenses of $1,048,689, whichall remaining deferred revenue was recognized asat that time. We recognized collaboration revenues of $0 and $177,389 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Table of Contents

Cost of Product Revenue


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018		Variance		Variance %
Cost of Product Revenue
Material cost	$	511,852	$	229,271	$	282,581	123	%
Direct labor		122,996		151,015		(28,019)	(19)	%
Distribution fees		89,820		68,950		20,870	30	%
Royalties		55,265		11,496		43,769	381	%
Other		85,010		3,429		81,581	2379	%
Total	$	864,943	$	464,161	$	400,782	86	%

Cost of product revenue ~~ratably over the estimated development period of one year resulting in $177,389 and $459,700 in collaboration revenue~~increased $400,782 from $464,161 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $864,943 for the same period in 2019. The increase in cost of product revenue quarter over quarter was due to increased sales of Mytesi.

Research and ~~2017, respectively. In addition~~Development Expense


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018		Variance		Variance %
R&D:
Personnel and related benefits	$	554,000	$	586,133	$	(32,133)	(5)	%
Materials expense and tree planting		30,630		62,009		(31,379)	(51)	%
Travel, other expenses		17,914		20,494		(2,580)	(13)	%
Clinical and contract manufacturing		600,603		25,470		575,133	2,258	%
Stock-based compensation		67,051		79,714		(12,663)	(16)	%
Other		151,162		(15,954)		167,116	(1,047)	%
Total	$	1,421,360	$	757,866	$	663,494	88	%

Research and development expense increased $663,494 from $757,866 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $1,421,360 for the ~~upfront payments, Elanco reimbursed us for $0~~three months ended March 31, 2019 due primarily to:

Clinical and contract manufacturing expense increased $575,133 from $25,470 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $600,603 in the same period in 2019 primarily due to an increase in contract manufacturing costs for enhanced manufacturing process improvements the Company is developing to reduce the cost of revenue.

Personnel and related benefits decreased $32,133 from $586,133 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $554,000 in the same period in 2019 due to changes in headcount and related salaries.

Stock-based compensation decreased $12,663 from $79,714 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $67,051 in the same period in 2019 primarily due to a decrease in the number of option grants and outstanding options.

Table of Contents

Other expenses, consisting primarily of consulting, formulation and regulatory fees, increased $167,116 from $15,954 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $151,161 in the same period in 2019. Consulting expenses increased due to an increase in clinical trial consultants consistent with the temporary termination of clinical trials and an increase in R&D testing consultant work, net of an increase in Napo consulting expense. Formulation expenses were relatively constant in the comparative periods. Regulatory expenses decreased due to the Company receiving a waiver of fee payment from the FDA. Formulation expenses were relatively constant in the comparative periods.

Sales and ~~$288,166~~Marketing Expense


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018		Variance		Variance %
S&M:
Personnel and related benefits	$	1,041,398	$	631,864	$	409,534	65	%
Stock-based compensation		33,842		2,385		31,457	1,319	%
Direct Marketing Fees		355,765		1,032,078		(676,313)	(66)	%
Other		134,119		45,863		88,256	192	%
Total	$	1,565,124	$	1,712,190	$	(147,066)	(9)	%

Sales and marketing expense decreased $147,066 from $1,712,190 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 ~~and 2017 for certain development and regulatory expenses related~~ to ~~the planned target animal safety study and the completion of the Canalevia field study for acute diarrhea~~$1,565,124 in ~~dogs which were also included in collaboration revenue. Elanco terminated the arrangement effective January 30, 2018.~~

~~Cost of Revenue~~

~~The following table presents the components of cost of revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 together with the change in such components in dollars and as a percentage:~~

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

Variance

Variance %

Cost of Revenue

Material cost

$
229,271

$
16,145

$
213,126

1320.1
%
Direct labor

151,015

—

151,015

N/A

Distribution fees

68,950

—

68,950

N/A

Royalties

11,496

—

11,496

N/A

Other

3,429

—

3,429

N/A

Total

$
464,161

$
16,145

$
448,016

2775.0
%

~~Cost of revenue increased $448,016 from $16,145 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $464,161 for~~ the same period in ~~2018. Napo related cost~~2019 due primarily to:

Direct marketing and sales expense decreased $676,313 from $1,032,078 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $355,765 for the same period in 2019 due to a decrease in marketing programs for Mytesi.

Personnel and related benefits increased $409,534 from $631,864 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $1,041,398 in the same period in 2019 due to the expansion of our sales and marketing headcount in support of Mytesi.

Stock based compensation expense increased $31,457 from $2,385 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $33,842 in the same period in 2019 due to an increase in the volume of new options granted to new and existing employees.

General and Administrative Expense


	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2019		2018		Variance		Variance %
G&A:
Personnel and related benefits	$	448,444	$	406,043	$	42,401	10	%
Accounting fees		269,973		249,606		20,367	8	%
Third-party consulting fees and Napo service fees		551,531		397,817		153,714	39	%
Legal fees		758,731		729,570		29,161	4	%
Travel		53,508		74,254		(20,746)	(28)	%
Stock-based compensation		325,615		190,144		135,471	71	%
Rent and lease expense		174,968		100,829		74,139	74	%
Public company expenses		187,292		197,528		(10,236)	(5)	%
Other		743,352		652,609		90,743	14	%
Total	$	3,513,414	$	2,998,400	$	515,014	17	%

Table of ~~revenue related to Mytesi was $449,635~~Contents

General and $0administrative expenses increased $515,014 from $2,998,400 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 ~~and 2017 as the merger was effective July 31, 2017.~~

~~Research and Development Expense~~

The following table presents the components of research and development expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 together with the change in such components in dollars and as a percentage:

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

Variance

Variance %

R&D:

Personnel and related benefits

$
586,133

$
460,619

$
125,514

27.2
%
Materials expense and tree planting

62,009

38,101

23,908

62.7
%
Travel, other expenses

20,494

72,570

(52,076
)
(71.8
)%
Clinical and contract manufacturing

25,470

295,504

(270,034
)
(91.4
)%
Stock-based compensation

79,714

65,799

13,915

21.1
%
Other

(15,954
)
322,859

(338,813
)
(104.9
)%
Total

$
757,866

$
1,255,452

$
(497,586
)
(39.6
)%

~~Our research and development expense decreased $497,586 from $1,255,452 from the three months ended March 31, 2017~~ to ~~$757,866~~$3,513,414 for the same period in 2018. Personnel and related benefits increased $125,514 from $460,619 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $586,133 in the same period in 2018 due to an increase in headcount and related salaries and benefits quarter over quarter. Travel expenses decreased $52,076 from $72,570 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $20,494 in the same period in 2018 due primarily to a decrease in clinical activity. Clinical trial work decreased resulting in a reduction of expense of $270,034 from $295,504 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $25,470 in the same period in 2018. Stock-based compensation increased $13,915 from $65,799 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $79,714 in the same period in 20182019 primarily due to ~~an increase~~increases in ~~the number of option grants and outstanding options quarter over quarter. Other expenses, consisting primarily of consulting, formulation and regulatory~~legal fees, decreased $338,813 from $322,859 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to ($15,954) in the same period in 2018. Consulting expenses decreased $69,784 from $211,010 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $141,226 in the same period in 2018 consistent with the decrease in contractor utilization to assist in our clinical trials and in chemistry, manufacturing and controls (“CMC”) activities. Formulation expenses decreased $20,922 from $63,465 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $42,543 for the same period in 2018 due to an decrease in work needed for clinical operations. Regulatory expenses decreased $245,278 from $25,775 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to ($219,503) in the same period in 2018 due to Napo receiving a waiver from the FDA for previously accrued FDA fees. We plan to increase our research and development expense as we continue developing our drug candidates. Our research and development expenses include $313,240 of Napo research and development expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2018 compared to $0 in the same period in 2017 as the merger with Napo occurred on July 31, 2017.

We continued to increase our level of support for the reforestation of croton lechleri trees in South America, which is reflected in an increase in spend of $23,909 from $38,100 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $62,009 in the same period in 2018. We value and take to heart the responsibility to replenish trees consumed in order to extract the raw material to manufacture our primary commercial product and the drug product for use in clinical trials.

~~Sales and Marketing Expense~~

The following table presents the components of sales and marketing expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 together with the change in such components in dollars and as a percentage:

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

Variance

Variance %

S&M:

Personnel and related benefits

$
631,864

$
64,890

$
566,974

873.7
%
Stock-based compensation

2,385

7,658

(5,273
)
(68.9
)%
Direct Marketing Fees

1,032,078

29,876

1,002,202

3354.5
%
Other

45,863

20,488

25,375

123.9
%
Total

$
1,712,190

$
122,912

$
1,589,278

1293.0
%

Our sales and marketing expense increased $1,589,278 from $122,912 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $1,712,190 in the same period in 2018. Personnel and related benefits increased $566,974 from $64,890 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $631,864 in the same period in 2018 due to headcount changes quarter over quarter primarily to drive sales of Mytesi. Stock based compensation expense decreased $5,273 from $7,658 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $2,385 in the same period in 2018 due to new options granted at a much lower fair value due to a lower strike price and a lower fair market value. Direct marketing and sales expense increased $1,002,202 from $29,876 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $1,032,078 for the same period in 2018 due to an increase in marketing programs to promote the Napo Mytesi product. Other expenses, consisted primarily of travel expense, consulting expense and royalty expense, which collectively increased $25,375 from $20,488 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $45,863 in the same period in 2018. We plan to expand sales and marketing spend to promote our Mytesi products. Sales and marketing expenses include $1,658,887 in Napo sales and marketing expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $0 in the same period in 2017 as the merger with Napo occurred on July 31, 2017.

~~General and Administrative Expense~~

The following table presents the components of general and administrative expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 together with the change in such components in dollars and as a percentage:

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

Variance

Variance %

G&A:

Personnel and related benefits

$
406,043

$
382,112

$
23,931

6.3
%
Accounting fees

249,606

177,178

72,428

40.9
%
Third-party consulting fees and Napo service fees

397,817

944,261

(546,444
)
(57.9
)%
Legal fees

729,570

1,201,215

(471,645
)
(39.3
)%
Travel

74,254

67,381

6,873

10.2
%
Stock-based compensation

190,144

154,579

35,565

23.0
%
Rent and lease expense

100,829

78,987

21,842

27.7
%
Public company expenses

197,528

79,424

118,104

148.7
%
Other

652,609

218,366

434,243

198.9
%
Total

$
2,998,400

$
3,303,503

$
(305,103
)
(9.2
)%

Our general and administrative expenses decreased $305,103 from $3,303,503 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $2,998,400 for the same period in 2018 due primarily to a decrease of $1,794,777 in merger related expenses incurred in the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to the same period in 2017 as significantly all merger related work occurred in 2017. Personnel and related benefits increased $23,931 from $382,112 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $406,043 in the same period in 2018 due to changes in headcount personnel and related salaries quarter over quarter. Personnel and related benefits for the three months ended March 31, 2018 include $168,518 for Napo’s personnel and related benefits. Stock-basedstock-based compensation increased $35,565 from $154,579 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $190,144 in the same period in 2018 due primarily to expense associated with new grants to existing employees. Public company expenses increased $118,104 from $79,424 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $197,528 in the same period in 2018 due primarily to and increase of $105,606 in printer fees, NASDAQ fees, and Investor relations and investor services fees quarter over quarter. Accounting fees increased $72,428 from $177,178 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $249,606 in the same period in 2018 due primarily to an increase in complexity of accounting due to the merger with Napo and due to an increasing number of complex debt and equity transactions. Legal fees decreased $471,645 from $1,201,215 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $729,570 in the same period in 2018 due to a reduction of $916,674 in merger related legal fees quarter over quarter, net of increases due to $445,029 in an increase in non-merger related general corporate legal fees quarter over quarter. Consulting expenses decreased $546,444 from $944,261 in the three months ended March 31, 2017, consisting of the $858,103 fairness opinion consulting related to the merger and $86,158 in other consulting fees, to $397,818 in the same period in 2018 due primarily to Napo related consulting services of $234,154 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 compared to $0 in 2017. Rent and lease expense increased $21,842 from $78,987 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $100,829 in the same period in 2018 due primarily to an increase of $31,866 in employee leasing chargebacks to Napo in the three months ended March 31, 2017 for space used in connection with our employees providing services to Napo during the seven months ended July 31, 2017. Other expenses, including warrant expense, insurance costs, office and facilities expenses increased $434,243 from $218,366 in the three months ended March 31, 2017 to $652,609 in the same period in 2018 primarily due to $435,557 of Napo expenses related primarily to $421,667 in intangible asset amortization. expense:

Other general and administrative expenses increased $90,742 from $652,609 in three months ended March 31, 2018 to $743,351 in the same period in 2019.

Consulting fees increased $153,714 from $397,817 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $551,531 in the same period in 2019. This was due to employee turnover which was mitigated by independent consultants while the Company recruited for full time employees.

Stock-based compensation expense increased $135,471 from $190,144 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $325,615 in the same period in 2019 due to an increase in the volume of option grants to new and existing employees.

Legal fees increased $29,161 from $729,570 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $758,731 in the same period in 2019 mainly due to legal fees incurred in connection with financing activities during the quarter.

Accounting fees increased by $20,367 from $249,606 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $269,973 in the same period in 2019 due to additional complex debt transaction analysis.

Rent and lease expense increased $74,139 from $100,829 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $174,968 in the same period in 2019 is due to contractual increases in rent obligations and a result of amortizing our right of use asset in accordance with the adoption of ASC 842 Leases as of January 1, 2019.

Public company expenses decreased by $10,236 from $197,528 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 to $187,292 in the same period in 2019.

We expect to incur additional general and administrative expense as a result of operating as a public company and as we grow our business, ~~including expenses related to compliance with the rules and regulations of the SEC,~~ additional insurance expenses, investor relations activities and other administrative and professional services. General and administrative expenses include $1,081,668 in Napo general and administrative expenses for the three month period ended March 31, 2018 compared to $0 in the same period in 2017 as the merger with Napo occurred on July 31, 2017.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity

We ~~had an accumulated deficit of $68,101,359 as a result of incurring~~have incurred net losses since our ~~inception primarily because we have not generated enough revenue to cover costs and expenses through the current fiscal year. Our net loss and comprehensive loss was $5,696,637 for~~inception. For the three months ended March 31, ~~2018. We~~2019 and 2018, we had net losses of $8.3 million and $5.7 million, respectively, and we expect ~~to continue~~ to incur additional losses ~~through~~in the ~~end~~near-term future. At March 31, 2019 we had an accumulated deficit of ~~fiscal year 2018~~$102.9 million. To date, we have generated only limited revenue, and ~~into future years due~~we may never achieve revenue sufficient to ~~expected significant expenses for toxicology, safety and efficacy clinical trials of~~offset our ~~products and product candidates, for establishing contract manufacturing capabilities, and for the commercialization of one or more of our product candidates, if approved.~~

expenses.

We had cash ~~and cash equivalents~~ of ~~$7,808,324~~$2.6 million as of March 31, ~~2018.~~2019. We do not believe our existing cash and cash equivalents will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for the next 12 months. Our independent registered public accounting firm has included an explanatory paragraph in its audit report included in our Annual Report on Form ~~10-K~~10‑K for the years ended December 31, ~~2017~~2018 and ~~2016~~2017 regarding our assessment of substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

~~To date, we~~

Table of Contents

We have funded our operations primarily through the issuance of equity ~~securities, short-term convertible promissory notes,~~ and ~~long-term~~ debt financing, in addition to sales of our commercial ~~products:~~

· In 2013, we received $400 from the issuance of 2,666,666 shares of common stock to our parent Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. We also received $519,000 of net cash from the issuance of convertible promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of $525,000. These notes were all converted to common stock in 2014.

· In 2014, we received $6.7 million in proceeds from the issuance of convertible preferred stock. Effective as of the closing of our initial public offering, the 3,015,902 shares of outstanding convertible preferred stock were automatically converted into 2,010,596 shares of common stock. Following our initial public offering, there were no shares of preferred stock outstanding.

· In 2014, we received $1.1 million from the issuance of convertible promissory notes in an aggregate principal amount of $1.1 million. These notes were converted to common stock upon the effectiveness of the initial public offering in May of 2015. In August 2014, we entered into a standby line of credit with an individual, who is an accredited investor, for up to $1.0 million. To date, we had not made any drawdowns under this facility. Also, in October of 2014, as amended and restated in December 2014, we entered into a $1.0 million standby bridge loan which was repaid in 2015.

· In 2015, we received $1.25 million in exchange for $1.25 million of convertible promissory notes, of which $1.0 million was converted to common stock in 2015, and $100,000 was repaid in 2015. The remaining $150,000 remains outstanding.

· In May 2015, we received net proceeds of $15.9 million upon the closing of our initial public offering, gross proceeds of $20.0 million (2,860,000 shares at $7.00 per share) net of $1.2 million of underwriting discounts and commissions and $3.3 million of offering expenses, including $0.4 million of non-cash expense. These shares began trading on The NASDAQ Capital Market on May 13, 2015.

· In 2015, we received net proceeds of $5.9 million from the issuance of long-term debt. We entered into a loan and security agreement with a lender for up to $8.0 million, which provided for an initial loan commitment of $6.0 million. Under the loan agreement we are required to maintain $4.5 million of the proceeds in cash, which amount may be reduced or eliminated on the achievement of certain milestones. An additional $2.0 million is available contingent on the achievement of certain further milestones. The agreement has a term of three years, with interest only payments through February 29, 2016. Thereafter, principal and interest payments will be made with an interest rate of 9.9%. Additionally, there will be a balloon interest payment of $560,000 on August 1, 2018. This amount is being recognized over the term of the loan agreement and the effective interest rate, considering the balloon payment, is 15.0%.products. Our ~~proceeds are net of a $134,433 debt discount under the terms of the agreement.~~

· ~~In 2014 and 2015, we received $24,000 and $531,000, respectively, in cash from sales of Neonorm to distributors.~~

· ~~In 2015, we received approximately $13,000 in proceeds from the exercise of stock options.~~

· In 2016, we received net proceeds of $4.1 million upon the closing of our follow-on public offering, reflecting gross proceeds of $5.0 million (2.0 million shares at $2.50 per share) net of $373,011 of underwriting discounts and commissions and $496,887 of offering expenses.

· In June 2016, we entered into the CSPA with a private investor. Under the terms of the agreement, we may sell up to $15.0 million in common stock to the investor during the approximately 30-month term of the agreement. Upon execution of the CSPA, we sold 222,222 shares of our common stock to the investor at $2.25 per share for net proceeds of $448,732, reflecting gross proceeds of $500,000 and offering expenses of $51,268. In consideration for entering into the CSPA, we issued 456,667 shares of our common stock to the investor. We issued 1,348,601 shares in exchange for net proceeds of $2,122,570, reflecting gross proceeds of $2,176,700 net of $54,130 offering expenses under the CSPAfunding activities in the ~~year ended December 31, 2016. And in the nine~~three months ended September 30, 2017, we sold another 3,972,510 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for $2,387,085 of gross cash proceeds. Of the $15.0 million available under the CSPA, we have received $5,063,785 from the sale of 6,000,000 shares of our common stock as of December 31, 2017.

· In October 2016, we entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with an existing private investor. Upon execution of the agreement we sold 170,455 shares of our common stock in exchange for $150,000 in cash proceeds.

· On November 22, 2016, we entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, or the 2016 Purchase Agreement, with certain institutional investors, pursuant to which we sold securities to such investors in a private placement transaction, which we refer to herein as the 2016 Private Placement. In the 2016 Private Placement, we sold an aggregate of 1,666,668 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.60 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $1.0 million. The investors in the 2016 Private Placement also received (i) warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,666,668 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $0.75 per share, or the Series A Warrants, (ii) warrants to purchase up to an aggregate 1,666,668 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $0.90 per share, or the Series B Warrants, and (iii) warrants to purchase up to an aggregate 1,666,668 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, or the Series C Warrants and, together with the Series A Warrants and the Series B Warrants, the 2016 Warrants.

· On January 27, 2017, we entered into a licensing, development, co-promotion and commercialization agreement with Elanco to license, develop and commercialize Canalevia, our drug product candidate under investigation for treatment of acute and chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in dogs, and other drug product formulations of crofelemer for treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, conditions and symptoms in cats and other companion animals. The Elanco Agreement grants Elanco exclusive global rights to Canalevia, a product whose active pharmaceutical ingredient is sustainably isolated and purified from the Croton lechleri tree, for use in companion animals. Pursuant to the Elanco Agreement, Elanco will have exclusive rights globally outside the U.S. and co-exclusive rights with us in the U.S. to direct all marketing, advertising, promotion, launch and sales activities related to the Licensed Products.

· Under the terms of the Elanco Agreement, we received an initial upfront payment of $2,548,689 inclusive of reimbursement of past product and development expenses of $1,048,689 and we will receive additional payments upon achievement of certain development, regulatory and sales milestones in an aggregate amount of up to $61.0 million payable throughout the term of the Elanco Agreement, as well as product development expense reimbursement, and royalty payments on global sales. The Elanco Agreement specifies that we will supply the Licensed Products to Elanco, and that the parties will agree to set a minimum sales requirement that Elanco must meet to maintain exclusivity. Elanco will also reimburse us for Canalevia-related expenses, including reimbursement for Canalevia-related expenses in Q4 2016, certain development and regulatory expenses related to our planned target animal safety study and the completion of our field study of Canalevia for acute diarrhea in dogs. On November 1, 2017, Elanco notified the Company of its intention to terminate the Elanco Agreement, effective January 30, 2018.

· On March 31, 2017, we entered into a merger agreement with Napo, pursuant to which we are required, among other things, to issue approximately 69,299,346 shares of our common stock and non-voting common stock to Napo creditors, noteholders, holders of Napo warrants, options or restricted stock units, and Invesco upon consummation of the merger.

· On June 28, 2017, we closed a private investment in public entities, or PIPE, with a member of our board of directors. We received gross proceeds of $50,000 in exchange for 100,000 shares of our common stock.

· On June 29, 2017, we issued a secured convertible promisorry note to a lendor in the aggregate principal amount of $2,155,000 less an original issue discount of $425,000 and less $30,000 to cover the lender’s legal fees for net cash proceeds of $1,700,000. Interest on the outstanding balance will be paid 8% per annum from the purchase price date until the balance is paid in full. All interest calculations are computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve (12) thirty (30) day months compounded daily and payable in accordance with the terms of the Note. All principal and interest on the debt is due in full on August 2, 2018.

· ~~On July 13, 2017, we closed a PIPE, with an investor. We received gross proceeds of $50,000 in exchange for 100,000 shares of our common stock.~~

· ~~On July 31, 2017,~~2019 were as ~~part of the merger with Napo, we sold 3,243,243 shares of our common stock to an investor in exchange for $1,000,000 in cash and $2,000,000 in a direct payoff of Napo debt.~~follows:

· On July 31, 2017, we entered into Warrant Exercise Agreements, or Exercise Agreements, with certain holders of Series C Warrants, or the Exercising Holders, which Exercising Holders own, in the aggregate, Series C Warrants exercisable for 908,334 shares of the Company’s common stock. Pursuant to the Exercise Agreements, the Exercising Holders and the Company agreed that the Exercising Holders would exercise their Series C Warrants with respect to 908,334 shares of common stock underlying such Series C Warrants for a reduced exercise price equal to $0.40 per share. The Company received aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $363,334 from the exercise of the Series C Warrants by the Exercising Holders.

· On October 3, 2017, we issued 21,250,000 shares of our common stock in exchange for net proceeds of $3,494,173 upon the closing of our follow-on public offering, consisting of gross proceeds of $4,250,000 net of $297,500 of underwriting discounts and commissions and $458,377 of offering expenses. On November 1, 2017, we issued an additional 437,500 shares for net proceeds of $81,331 consisting of gross proceeds of $87,500 net of $6,125 of underwriting discounts and commissions and $1,500 in expenses.

· On November 24, 2017, we entered into a share purchase agreement with an investor wherein during the year ended December 31, 2017 we received net proceeds of $555,000 in exchange for 5,100,000 shares of our common stock.

· On December 8, 2017, we issued a secured promisorry note to CVP in the aggregate principal amount of $1,587,500 less an original issue discount of $462,500 and less $25,000 to cover the lender’s legal fees for net cash proceeds of $1,100,000. Interest on the outstanding balance will be paid 8% per annum from the purchase price date until the balance is paid in full. All interest calculations are computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve (12) thirty (30) day months compounded daily and payable in accordance with the terms of the Note. All principal and interest on the debt is due in full on September 8, 2018.

· In December 2017, in a private investment in public entities, the Company entered into various purchase agreements with existing investors and issued 4,010,000 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for $401,000 in cash. And in January 2018, the Company entered into stock purchase agreements with existing investors and issued 7,182,818 shares of the Company’s common stock in exchange for $750,100 in cash.

· In November and December 2017, in a private investment in public entitites, the Company issued 5,100,000 shares of its common stock with a single investor in exchange for $555,262 in cash. And in January, February and March 2018, the Company issued an additional 9,746,413 shares of its common stock to the investor for an additional $1,305,774.

· ~~In January 2018, the Company issued 50,000 shares of common stock to an existing investor in exchange for $6,425 in services rendered.~~

· ~~In the first quarter of 2018, the Company issued 12,314,291 shares of its common stock in exchange for redemption of certain convertible debt.~~

· On February 26, 2018, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with CVP, pursuant to which the Company issued to CVP a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $2,240,909 for an aggregate purchase price of $1,560,000. The Note carries an original issue discount of $655,909, and the initial principal balance also includes $25,000 to cover CVP’s transaction expenses. The Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum and matures on (i) August 26, 2019 if the Company has raised at least $12 million in equity after the issuance date of the Note (the “Redemption Start Condition”) and on or before April 1, 2018 or (ii) November 26, 2018 if the Redemption Start Condition is not satisfied on or before April 1, 2018.

· On March 21, 2018, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with CVP, pursuant to which the Company issued to CVP a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,090,341 for an aggregate purchase price of $750,000. The Note carries an original issue discount of $315,341, and the initial principal balance also includes $25,000 to cover CVP’s transaction expenses. The Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum and matures on September 21, 2019.

· ~~In March of 2018, the Company issued 4,285,423 shares of its common stock in exchange for payment of interest expense on certain long-term convertible debt.~~

· In March 2018, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement with Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. pursuant to which the Company, in a private placement, agreed to issue and sell to Sagard 5,524,926 shares of the Company’s series A convertible participating preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $9,199,001. Each share of preferred stock is initially convertible into nine shares of common stock at an effective conversion price of $0.185 per share (based on an original price per Preferred Share of $1.665), provided that, at any time prior to the time the Company obtains stockholder approval, as required pursuant to Nasdaq Rule 5635(b) any conversion of Preferred Stock by a holder into shares of the Common Stock would be prohibited if, as a result of such conversion, the holder, together with such holder’s attribution parties, would beneficially own more than 19.99% of the total number of shares of the Common Stock issued and outstanding after giving effect to such conversion. Subject to certain limited exceptions, the shares of Preferred Stock cannot be offered, pledged or sold by Sagard for one year from the date of issuance. The conversion price is subject to certain adjustments in the event of any stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, combination or other similar recapitalization. Concurrently with the consummation of the preferred stock offering, the Company entered into share purchase agreements with certain institutional investors pursuant to which the Company issued 29,411,766 shares of the Company’s common stock in exhcnage for $5.0 million in cash.

In the first quarter of 2019, we issued 5,333,333 shares of its common stock via an equity line of credit. A further 8,000,000 shares of common stock were issued via an option to increase this equity line of credit. Total proceeds were $2.5 million.

Between January through March 31, 2019, we entered into exchange agreements with Chicago Venture Partners L.P., pursuant to which we issued to CVP 18,764,637 shares of common stock, with a fair value of $6.1 million, in exchange for a reduction of approximately $4.4 million in the principal amount of the CVP Promissory Notes and $1.7 million in accrued interest thereon.

In March 2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreement, pursuant to which we intend to issue up to $5.5 million in notes payable. As of March 31, 2019, two notes with an aggregate principal amount of $0.8 million had been issued.

In March 2019, we entered into a securities purchase agreement, whereby we issued in a public offering 1,331,332 shares to an existing investor, for gross proceeds of approximately $0.3 million.

In March 2019, we issued 1,382,636 shares of our common stock in lieu of a cash payment of $0.4 million in interest expense on notes payable.

We expect our expenditures will continue to increase as we continue our efforts to develop ~~animal health~~our products ~~expand our commercially available Neonorm product~~ and continue development of our pipeline in the near term. We do not believe our current capital is sufficient to fund our operating plan through ~~March~~December 2019. We will need to seek additional funds through public or private equity or debt financings or other sources, such as strategic collaborations. Such financing may result in dilution to stockholders, imposition of debt covenants and repayment obligations or other restrictions that may affect our business. In addition, we may seek additional capital due to favorable market conditions or strategic considerations even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans. We may also not be successful in entering into partnerships that include payment of upfront licensing fees for our products and product candidates for markets outside the United States, where appropriate. If we do not generate upfront fees from any anticipated arrangements, it would have a negative effect on our operating plan. We plan to finance our operations and capital funding needs through equity and/or debt financing as well as revenue from future product sales. However, there can be no assurance that additional funding will be available to us on acceptable terms on a timely basis, if at all, or that we will generate sufficient cash from operations to adequately fund operating needs or ultimately achieve profitability. If we are unable to obtain an adequate level of financing needed for the long-term development and commercialization of our products, we will need to curtail planned activities and reduce costs. Doing so will likely have an adverse effect on our ability to execute on our business plan. These matters raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue in existence as a going concern within one year after issuance date of the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31, ~~2017~~

2018

The following table shows a summary of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~2017:~~2018:


	March 31,
	2019		2018
Total cash used in operations	$	(3,465,574)	$	(9,621,693)
Total cash used in investing activities		—		(6,527)
Total cash provided by financing activities		3,469,161		16,676,677
	$	3,587	$	7,048,457

Three Months Ended

March 31,

March 31,

2018

2017

Total cash used in operations

$
(9,621,693
)
$
(288,720
)
Total cash used in investing activities

(6,527
)
—

Total cash provided by financing activities

16,676,677

52,701

$
7,048,457

$
(236,019
)

Table of Contents

Cash Used in Operating Activities

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, net cash used in operating activities of $3,465,574 resulted from our net loss of $8,303,871, adjusted for a reduction in the fair value of warrant liabilities of $46,057, debt discounts and debt issuance costs of $178,180, stock-based compensation of $426,508, depreciation and amortization expenses of $436,880, loss on the extinguishment of debt of $1,941,960 and of changes in operating assets and liabilities of $1,808,732.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, cash used in operating activities of ~~$9,621,692~~$9,621,693 resulted from our net loss of ~~$5.7 million,~~$5,696,637, adjusted by non-cash accretion of end of term payment, debt discounts and debt issuance costs of ~~$404,000,~~$403,824, stock-based compensation of ~~$272,000, reduction~~$272,243, change in the fair value of ~~warrant~~warrants, conversion option and derivative liability of ~~$89,000,~~$267,854, common stock issued in exchange for services rendered of ~~$6,000,~~$6,425, depreciation and amortization expenses of ~~$330,000,~~$329,561, interest paid on the conversion of debt to equity of ~~$20,000, and loss on revaluation of derivative liability of $4,000,~~$20,496, net of changes in operating assets and liabilities of ~~$5.1 million.~~$5,225,459.

~~During the three months ended March 31, 2017, cash used~~Cash Used in operating activities of $288,720 resulted from our net loss of $4.7 million, offset by non-cash accretion of end of term payment, debt discounts and debt issuance costs of $97,000, stock-based compensation of $228,000, change in the fair value of warrants of $453,000, loss on extinguishment of debt of $208,000, depreciation expense of $15,000, net of changes in operating assets and liabilities of $3.4 million.

~~Cash Provided By/Used In~~ Investing Activities

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, cash used in investing activities of $6,527 consisted of cash used to purchase ~~land,~~ property and equipment.

Cash Provided by Financing Activities

During the three months ended March 31, 2019, net cash provided by financing activities of $3,469,161 primarily consisted of $2,769,161 in net proceeds received from the issuance of common stock and $800,000 in proceeds received from the issuance of notes payable, offset by $100,000 in repayments of notes payable.

During the three months ended March 31, 2018, cash provided by financing activities of ~~$10,676,677~~$16,676,677 primarily consisted of ~~$1.3 million~~$1,305,774 and ~~$750,000~~$750,100 received in separate PIPE (“Private Investment in Public Entity”) financings, $14.0 million in net proceeds from the Sagard financing, including ~~$5.0 million~~$5,000,000 in net proceeds received from the issuance of common stock and ~~$9.0 million~~$9,000,002 in net proceeds received from the issuance of convertible preferred stock, ~~$2.3 million~~$2,310,000 received in the issuance of non-convertible debt, ~~and $363,000 received in the exercise of certain warrants,~~ offset by ~~$1.7 million~~$1,689,199 in principal payments of our long-term debt.

During the three months ended March 31, 2017, cash provided by financing activities of $52,701 primarily consisted of $543,000 in net proceeds received in the CSPA, offset by $490,000 in principal payments on our long-term debt.

~~Standby Lines of Credit, Convertible Notes and Warrant Issuances~~

~~Convertible Notes~~

~~Convertible notes at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017 consist of the following:~~

~~Interest expense on the convertible notes for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 follows:~~

~~Interest expense is classified as such in the statements of operations and comprehensive income.~~

~~February 2015 Convertible Note~~

In February 2015, the Company issued convertible promissory notes to two accredited investors in the aggregate principal amount of $250,000. These notes were issued pursuant to the convertible note purchase agreement dated December 23, 2014. In connection with the issuance of the notes, the Company issued the lenders warrants to purchase 22,320 shares at $5.60 per share, which expire December 31, 2017. Principal and interest of $103,912 was paid in May 2015 for $100,000 of these notes. The Company analyzed the beneficial nature of the conversion terms and determined that a BCF existed because the effective conversion price was less than the fair value at the time of the issuance. The Company calculated the value of the BCF using the intrinsic method. A BCF for the full face value was recorded as a discount to the notes payable and to additional paid-in capital. The full amount of the BCF was amortized to interest expense by the end of June 2015.

* Extinguishment of debt

On January 31, 2017, the Company entered into another amendment to extend the maturity date of the remaining note from January 1, 2017 to January 1, 2018. In exchange for the extension of the maturity date, on January 31, 2017, the Company’s board of directors granted the lender a warrant to purchase 370,916 shares of the Company’s common stock for $0.51 per share. The warrant is exercisable at any time on or before January 31, 2019, the expiration date of the warrant. The amendment and related warrant issuance resulted in the Company treating the debt as having been extinguished and replaced with new debt for accounting purposes due to meeting the 10% cash flow test. The Company calculated a loss on the extinguishment of debt of $207,713, or the equivalent to the fair value of the warrants granted, which is included in loss on extinguishment of debt in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss in the year ended December 31, 2017. In March of 2018, the debtor agreed to accept the Company’s common stock as payment for all outstanding principal and interest. And in April of 2018, the Company issued 2,034,082 shares of common stock to pay off the principal and interest balance.

The $150,000 note is included in convertible notes payable on the balance sheet. The Company has unpaid accrued interest of $56,367 and $38,367, which is included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet as of March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, and incurred interest expense of $4,438 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 which are included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

~~June 2017 Convertible Note~~

On June 29, 2017, the Company issued a secured convertible promisorry note to a lendor in the aggregate principal amount of $2,155,000 less an original issue discount of $425,000 and less $30,000 to cover the lender’s legal fees for net cash proceeds of $1,700,000. Interest on the outstanding balance will be paid 8% per annum from the purchase price date until the balance is paid in full. All interest calculations are computed on the basis of a 360-day year comprised of twelve (12) thirty (30) day months compounded daily and payable in accordance with the terms of the Note. All principal and interest on the debt is due in full on August 2, 2018. The Company accrued interest of $4,548 and $6,180 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, which is included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet, and incurred nominal interest of $18,864 in interest expense in the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company accreted debt discount of $118,923 for the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The lender has the right to convert all or any portion of the outstanding balance into the Company’s common stock at $1.00 per share. The Note provides the lender with an optional monthly redemption that allows for the monthly payment of up to $350,000 at the creditor’s option.

~~The Note provides for two separate features that result in a derivative liability:~~

The Company computed fair values at June 30, 2017 of $15,000 and $5,000 for the repayment and the interest rate increase feature, respectively, using the Binomial Lattice Model, which was based on the generalized binomial option pricing formula. The $20,000 combined fair value was carved out and is included as a derivative liability on the Balance Sheet. The derviatives were revalued at December 31, 2017 and March 31, 2018 using the same Model resulting in a combined fair value of $11,000 and $15,000, respectively. The $4,000 loss is included in other income and expense in the statement of income and comprehensive income.

The balance of the note payable of $540,684, consisting of the $2,155,000 face value of the note less note discounts and debt issuance costs of $509,000, less the $20,000 derivative liability, less principal payments of $1,451,454, plus the accretion of the debt discount and debt issuance costs of $366,098, is included in convertible notes payable on the balance sheet.

~~Interest payable on the accumulation of all convertible notes was $121,018 and $118,228 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017.~~

~~Convertible Notes Payable~~

~~First Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement and Notes~~

In December 2017, Napo amended the exchangeable note purchase agreement to extend the maturity of the first tranche and second tranche of notes to February 15, 2018 and April 1, 2018, respectively, increase the principal amount by 12%, and reduce the conversion price from $0.56 per share to $0.20 per share. The Company also issued 2,492,084 shares of common stock to the lenders in connection with this amendment to partially redeem $299,050 from the first tranche of the notes. The amended face value of the notes is $1,170,950. This amendment resulted in the Company treating the notes as having been extinguished and replaced with new notes for accounting purposes due to meeting the 10% cash flow test. The Company calculated a loss on extinguishment of notes of $157,500, which is included in loss on extinguishment of debt in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income. The conversion option in the notes was bifurcated and accounted as a conversion option liability at its fair value of $111,841 using the Black-Scholes-Merton model and the following criteria: stock price of $0.14 per share, conversion prices of $0.20 per share, expected life of 0.13 to 0.25 years, volatility of 86.29% to 160.78%, risk free rate of 1.28% to 1.39% and dividend rate of 0%. The $111,841 was included in conversion option liability on the balance sheet and in loss on extinguishment of debt on the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

~~Second Amendment to Note Purchase Agreement and Notes~~

~~On February 16, 2018, Napo amended~~ the exchangeable note purchase agreement to extend the maturity date of the Second Tranche Notes from April 1, 2018 to May 1, 2018. In addition, the Company also issued 3,783,444 shares of Common Stock to the Purchasers as repayment of the remaining $435,950 aggregate principal amount of the original issue discount exchangeable promissory notes previously issued by Napo to the Purchasers on March 1, 2017 pursuant to the Note Purchase Agreement (the “First Tranche Notes”) and $18,063 in accrued and unpaid interest thereon. On March 23, 2018, the Company paid off the remaining $735,000 of principal and $20,699.38 in interest due on the second tranche debt in cash with proceeds from the March 23, 2018 equity financing. The fair value of the conversion option liability was again revalued at March 23, 2018 using the Black-Scholes-Merton model using the following criteria: stock price of $0.21 per share, expected life of 0.11 years, volatility of 288.16%, risk free rate of 1.69% and dividend rate of 0%, resulting in an increase of $174,754 to the fair value of the conversion option liability and included in the change in fair value of warrants and conversion option liability in the statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The underlying debt was paid off in March of 2018 and the $286,595 conversion option liability was written off to other income in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

~~Convertible Long-term Debt~~

In December 2016, Napo entered into a note purchase agreement which provided for the sale of up to $12,500,000 face amount of notes and issued convertible promissory notes (the Napo December 2016 Notes) in the aggregate face amount of $2,500,000 to three lenders and received proceeds of $2,000,000 which resulted in $500,000 of original issue discount. In July 2017, Napo issued convertible promissory notes (the Napo July 2017 Notes) in the aggregate face amount of $7,500,000 to four lenders and received proceeds of $6,000,000 which resulted in $1,500,000 of original issue discount. The Napo December 2016 Notes and the Napo July 2017 Notes mature on December 30, 2019 and bear interest at 10% with interest due each six-month period after December 30, 2016. On June 30, 2017, the accrued interest of $125,338 was added to principal of the Napo December Notes, and the new principal balance became $2,625,338. Interest may be paid in cash or in the stock of Jaguar per terms of the note purchase agreement. In each one year period beginning December 30, 2016, up to one-third of the principal and accrued interest on the notes may be converted into the common stock of the merged entity at a conversion price of $0.925 per share. The Company assumed these convertible notes at fair value of $11,161,000 as part of the Napo Merger. The fair value was calculated using the Binomial Lattice Model using the following criteria: stock price of $0.5893, expected term of 2.42 years, conversion price of $0.925, volatility of 115%, and risk free rate of 1.41%. The $1,035,661 difference between the fair value of the notes and the principal balance is being amortized over the twenty-nine (29) month period from July 31, 2017 to December 31, 2019 or $178,562 and is recorded as a contra interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss. Interest expense is paid every six months through the issuance of common stock. On March 16, 2018, $534,775 of interest accrued through January 31, 2018 and $169,950 of certain legal expenses were paid through the issuance of 4,285,423 shares of the Company’s common stock. At March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the unamortized balance of the note payable is $10,875,300 and $10,982,438 which are included in Convertible Long-term Debt on the balance sheet, and the accrued interest on these notes is $163,670 and $448,779 as of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, and are included in accrued interest on the balance sheets. Interest of $249,666 less $107,167 of debt appreciation amortization or $142,529 was included in interest expense in the statements of operations and comprehensive income in the three months ended March 31, 2018.

~~Long-term Debt~~

~~As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the net Jaguar long-term debt obligation was as follows:~~

~~Interest expense on the Jaguar long-term debt for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:~~

~~Interest payable on the Jaguar long-term debt was $0 and $9,422 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.~~

~~Notes Payable~~

~~As of March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, the net Jaguar short-term notes payable was as follows:~~

~~Interest expense on the Jaguar short-term notes payable for the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 was as follows:~~

Three Months Ended

March 31,

2018

2017

Nominal interest

$
49,659

$
—

Accretion of debt discount

204,946

—

Total interest expense on notes payable

$
254,605

$
—

~~Interest payable on the Jaguar short-term notes payable was $57,793 and $8,134 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively.~~

On December 8, 2017, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with CVP pursuant to which the Company issued a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,587,500 for an aggregate purchase price of $1,100,000. The Note carries an original issue discount of $462,500, and the initial principal balance also includes $25,000 to cover CVP’s transaction expenses. The Company will use the proceeds for general corporate purposes. The Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum and matures on September 8, 2018. The balance of the note payable of $1,301,783 consists of the $1,587,500 face value of the note less note discounts and debt issuance costs of $487,500, plus the accretion of the debt discount and debt issuance costs of $201,783, is included in notes payable in the current liabilities section of the balance sheet. The Company accrued interest of $40,364 and $8,333 at March 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, which is included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet, and incurred nonmal interest of $32,230 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company accreted debt discount of $160,630 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

In addition, beginning on January 31, 2018, CVP will have the right to redeem a portion of the outstanding balance of the Note in any amount up to $350,000 per month for the first six months following the Purchase Price Date and $500,000 per month thereafter. For purposes of calculating the maximum amount that may be redeemed in any month, the amounts redeemed under the Note will be aggregated with all redemption amounts under the Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $2,155,000 issued by the Company in favor of the creditor on June 29, 2017.

On February 26, 2018, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with Chicago Venture Partners, L.P. (“CVP”), pursuant to which the Company issued to CVP a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $2,240,909 for an aggregate purchase price of $1,560,000. The Note carries an original issue discount of $655,909, and the initial principal balance also includes $25,000 to cover CVP’s transaction expenses. The Company will use the proceeds for general corporate purposes and working capital. The Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum and matures on (i) August 26, 2019 if the Company has raised at least $12 million in equity after the issuance date of the Note (the “Redemption Start Condition”) and on or before April 1, 2018 or (ii) November 26, 2018 if the Redemption Start Condition is not satisfied on or before April 1, 2018. The balance of the note payable of $1,599,217 consisting of the $2,240,909 face value of the note less note discounts and debt issuance costs of $680,909, plus the accretion of the debt discount and debt issuance costs of $39,217, is included in notes payable in the current liabilities section of the balance sheet. The Company accrued interest of $15,489 at March 31, 2018, which is included in accrued expenses on the balance sheet, and incurred nonmal interest of $15,489 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Company accreted debt discount of $39,217 in interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2018 which is included in interest expense in the statement of operations and comprehensive loss.

If the Redemption Start Condition is satisfied by April 1, 2018, the Company and CVP also agree to amend that certain Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the original amount of $2,155,000 issued by Company in favor of CVP on June 29, 2017 (the “June 2017 Note”) and that certain Secured Promissory Note in the original amount of $1,587,500 issued by Company in favor of CVP on December 8, 2017 (the “December 2017 Note,” and together with the June 2017 Note, the “Prior Notes”) to (i) extend the maturity date of the Prior Notes to August 26, 2019, (ii) postpone the date on which CVP can exercise its right to redeem the Prior Notes to September 26, 2018 and (iii) limit the aggregate amount that CVP is permitted to redeem on a monthly basis to $500,000, which amount is the maximum aggregate redemption amount for the Prior Notes and the Note collectively.

The Securities Purchase Agreement and the other transaction documents and obligations of the Company thereunder are subject in all respects to the terms of that certain subordination agreement and right to purchase debt (the “Subordination Agreement”) that the Company entered into with CVP with Hercules Capital, Inc. (“Hercules”) on June 29, 2017, pursuant to which (i) CVP subordinated (a) all of the Company’s debt and obligations to CVP to all of the Company’s indebtedness and obligations to Hercules and (b) all of CVP’s security interest, if any, in the Company’s assets to all of Hercules’ security interest in the Company’s assets and (ii) Hercules granted CVP the right to purchase 100% of the debt under the Company’s term loan so long as the purchase includes the full pay-out of funds owed to Hercules under the term loan at such time.

The Company also entered into a security agreement with CVP, pursuant to which CVP will receive a security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets. The security interest is effective upon CVP’s purchase of the Company’s outstanding obligations under that certain loan and security agreement, dated August 18, 2015, between the Company and Hercules Capital, Inc. or upon such time that the Hercules Loan is otherwise repaid in full.

On March 21, 2018, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement with CVP, pursuant to which the Company issued to CVP a promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $1,090,341 for an aggregate purchase price of $750,000. The Note carries an original issue discount of $315,341, and the initial principal balance also includes $25,000 to cover CVP’s transaction expenses. The Company will use the proceeds to fully repay certain prior secured and unsecured indebtedness. The Note bears interest at the rate of 8% per annum and matures on September 21, 2019.

Under the Securities Purchase Agreement, the Company is subject to certain covenants, including the obligations of the Company to: (i) timely file all reports required to be filed under Sections 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) and not terminate its status as an issuer required to file reports under the Exchange Act; (ii) maintain listing of the Company’s common stock on a securities exchange; (iii) avoid trading in the Company’s common stock from being suspended, halted, chilled, frozen or otherwise ceased; (iv) not issue any variable securities (i.e., Company securities that (a) have conversion rights of any kind in which the number of shares that may be issued pursuant to the conversion right varies with the market price of the Company’s common stock or (b) are or may become convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock with a conversion price that varies with the market price of such stock) that generate gross cash proceeds to the Company of less than the lesser of $1 million and the then-current outstanding balance of the Note without CVP’s prior consent; (v) not grant a security interest in its assets without CVP’s prior consent; (vi) not issue any shares of common stock to certain institutional investors; (vii) repay the Hercules Loan (as defined below) on or before March 26, 2018; (viii) repay all outstanding amounts owed to certain noteholders within five trading days of the date of issuance of the Note; (ix) not incur any debt other than in the ordinary course of business, and in no event greater than $10,000, without CVP’s prior consent; and (x) other customary covenants and obligations, for which the Company’s failure to comply may be subject to certain liquidated damages. The Hercules Loan was repaid in full on March 23, 2018, simultaneously with the closing of the Preferred Stock Offering.

In addition, beginning seven months from the effective date of the Note or at any time after the Effective Date if the Company breaches any of the covenants set forth in the Securities Purchase Agreement, CVP has the right to redeem all or any portion of the outstanding balance of the Note in cash or as otherwise mutually agreed upon between the parties.

~~Warrants~~

On November 22, 2016, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement, or the 2016 Purchase Agreement, with certain institutional investors, pursuant to which the Company sold securities to such investors in a private placement transaction, which we refer to herein as the 2016 Private Placement. In the 2016 Private Placement, the Company sold an aggregate of 1,666,668 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $0.60 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $1.0 million. The investors in the 2016 Private Placement also received (i) warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,666,668 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $0.75 per share, or the Series A Warrants, and the Placement Agent received warrants to purchase 133,333 shares of our common stock in lieu of cash for service fees with the same terms as the investors; (ii) warrants to purchase up to an aggregate 1,666,668 shares of the Company’s common stock, at an exercise price of $0.90 per share, or the Series B Warrants, and (iii) warrants to purchase up to an aggregate 1,666,668 shares of our common stock, at an exercise price of $1.00 per share, or the Series C Warrants and, together with the Series A Warrants and the Series B Warrants, the 2016 Warrants. The warrants were granted in three series with different terms. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes-Merton warrant pricing model as follows:

· Series A Warrants and Placement Agent Warrants: 1,666,668 warrant shares with a strike price of $0.75 per share and an expiration date of May 29, 2022; and 133,333 warrant shares to the placement agent with a strike price of $0.75 and an expiration date of May 29, 2022; the expected life is 5.5 years, the volatility is 71.92% and the risk free rate is 1.87% in valuing these warrants.

· �� Series B Warrants: 1,666,668 warrant shares with a strike price of $0.90 per share and an expiration date of November 29, 2017; the expected life is one year, the volatility is 116.65% and the risk free rate is 0.78% in valuing these warrants.

The warrant valuation date was November 29, 2016 and the closing price of $0.69 per share was used in determining the fair value of the warrants. The series A warrants and placement agent warrants were valued at $756,001 and were classified as a warrant liability in the Company’s balance sheet. The series A warrants and placement agent warrants were revalued on December 31, 2016 at $799,201 which is included in the Company’s balance sheet, and the $43,200 increase is included in the Company’s statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The stock price was $0.716, the strike price was $0.75 per share, the expected life was 5.41 years, the volatility was 73.62% and the risk free rate was 2.0%. The series B and C warrants were classified as equity, and as such were not subject to revaluation at year end. Costs incurred in connection with the issuance were allocated based on the relative fair values of the Series A and the Series B and C warrants. The series A warrants and placement agent warrants were revalued on December 31, 2017 at $103,860 and is included in the Company’s balance sheet. The valuation reflects a reduction of $695,341 from the $799,201 December 31, 2016 valuation. The reduction is included in the Company’s statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The $103,860 valuation at December 31, 2017 was computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model using a stock price of $0.1398, the strike price was $0.75 per share, the expected life was 4.41 years, the volatility was 96.36% and the risk free rate was 2.14%.

On July 31, 2017, the Company entered into Warrant Exercise Agreements (the “Exercise Agreements”) with certain holders of Series C Warrants (the “Exercising Holders”), which Exercising Holders own, in the aggregate, Series C Warrants exercisable for 908,334 shares of the Company’s common stock. Pursuant to the Exercise Agreements, the Exercising Holders and the Company agreed that the Exercising Holders would exercise their Series C Warrants with respect to 908,334 shares of common stock underlying such Series C Warrants for a reduced exercise price equal to $0.40 per share. The Company received aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $363,334 from the exercise of the Series C Warrants by the Exercising Holders. The difference between the pre-modification and post-modification fair value of $23,000 was expensed in general and administrative expense in the statements of operations and comprehensive income. The pre-modification fair value was computed using the Black-Scholes-Merton model using a stock price of $0.56 (fair market value on modification date), original strike price of $1.00, expected life of 0.83 years, volatility of 115.28%, risk-free rate of 1.20% to arrive at a fair value of $0.1347 per share. The post-modification fair value was computed using the intrinsic value on the date of modification or $0.16 per share.

The Company granted warrants to purchase the 1,224,875 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price price of $0.08 per share to replace Napo warrants upon the consummation of the Merger. Of the 1,224,875 warrants, 145,457 warrants expire on December 31, 2018 and 1,079,418 warrants expire on December 31, 2025. The warrants were valued at $630,859, using the Black-Scholes-Merton warrant pricing model as follows: exercise price of $0.08 per share, stock price of $0.56 per share, expected life ranging from 1.42 years to 8.42 years, volatility ranging from 75.07% to 110.03%, and risk free rate ranging from 1.28% to 2.14%. The warrants were accounted in equity.

~~The Company’s warrant activity is summarized as follows:~~

~~Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates~~

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S. GAAP, requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosures in the financial statements. Critical accounting policies are those accounting policies that may be material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change, and that have a material impact on financial condition or operating performance. While we base our estimates and judgments on our experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe the following critical accounting policies used in the preparation of our financial statements require significant judgments and estimates. For additional information relating to these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 to our audited financial statements, appearing elsewhere in this report.

~~Revenue Recognition~~

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASC 606”), which was adopted on January 1, 2018, using the modified retrospective method, which was elected to apply to all contracts. Application of the modified retrospective method did not impact amounts previously reported by the Company, nor did it require a cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption, as the Company’s method of recognizing revenue under ASC 606 was similar to the method utilized immediately prior to adoption. Accordingly, there is no need for the Company to dislose the amount by which each financial statement line item was affected as a result of applying the new revenue standard and an explanation of significant changes.

~~Contracts~~

Napo sells Mytesi through Mission, who then sells Mytesi to its distributors and wholesalers — McKesson, Cardinal Health, AmerisourceBergen Drug Corporation (“ABC”), HD Smith, Smith Drug and Publix (together “Distributors”). Mission sells Mytesi to their Distributors, on behalf of Napo, under agreements executed by Mission with these Distributors and Napo abides by the terms and conditions of sales agreed between Mission and their Distributors. Health care providers order Mytesi through pharmacies who obtain Mytesi through Mission’s Distributors. Napo considers the Distributors of Mission as its customers.

~~Performance obligations~~

~~Transaction price~~

~~Allocate transaction price~~

~~For both Napo and Jaguar, the entire transaction price is allocated to the single performance obligaton contained in each contract.~~

~~Point in time recognition~~

For both Napo and Jaguar, a single performance obligation is satisfied at a point in time, upon the FOB terms of each contract when control, including title and all risks, has transferred to the customer.

~~Disaggregation of Product Revenue~~

~~Human~~

~~Animal~~

~~Collaboration Revenue~~

On January 27, 2017, the Company entered into a licensing, development, co-promotion and commercialization agreement with Elanco US Inc. (“Elanco”) to license, develop and commercialize Canalevia, the Company’s drug product candidate under investigation for treatment of acute and chemotherapy-induced diarrhea in dogs, and other drug product formulations of crofelemer for treatment of gastrointestinal diseases, conditions and symptoms in cats and other companion animals. Under the terms of the agreement, the Company received an initial upfront payment of $2,548,689, inclusive of reimbursement of past product and development expenses of $1,048,689, which was recognized as revenue ratably over the estimated development period of one year resulting in $177,389 and $459,700 in collaboration revenue in the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. In addition to the upfront payments, Elanco reimbursed the Company for $0 and $288,166 in the three months ended March 31, 2018 and 2017 for certain development and regulatory expenses related to the planned target animal safety study and the completion of the Canalevia field study for acute diarrhea in dogs which were also included in collaboration revenue.

On November 1, 2017, the Company received a letter from Elanco serving as formal notice of their decision to terminate the agreement by giving the Company 90 days written notice. According to the agreement, termination became effective on January 30, 2018, which is 90 days after the date of the Notice. On the effective date of termination of the Elanco Agreement, all licenses granted to Elanco by the Company under the Elanco Agreement were revoked and the rights granted thereunder reverted back to the Company. Provisions in the agreement providing for the receipt of additional payments upon achievement of certain development, regulatory and sales milestones in an aggregate amount of up to $61.0 million payable throughout the term of the Elanco Agreement, as well as product development expense reimbursement for any additional product development expenses incurred, and royalty payments on global sales terminated on termination of the agreement.

~~Goodwill and Indefinite-lived Intangible Assets~~

Goodwill is tested for impairment on an annual basis and in between annual tests if events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have occurred. The test is based on a comparison of the reporting unit’s book value to its estimated fair market value. We perform annual impairment test during the fourth quarter of each fiscal year using the opening consolidated balance sheet as of the first day of the fourth quarter, with any resulting impairment recorded in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year.

If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s net assets exceeds its fair value, the goodwill would be considered impaired and would be reduced to its fair value. The goodwill was entirely allocated to the human health reporting unit as the goodwill relates to the Napo Merger. The decline in market capitalization during the year ended December 31, 2017 was determined to be a triggering event for potential goodwill impairment. Accordingly we performed the goodwill impairment analysis. The Company utilized the market capitalization plus a reasonable control premium in the performance of its impairment test. The market capitalization was based on the outstanding shares and the average market share price for the 30 days prior to December 31, 2017. Based on the results of our impairment test, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $16,827,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017. If the market capitalization decreases in the future, a reasonable possibility exists that goodwill could be further impaired in the near term and that such impairment may be material to the financial statements.

Fair value determinations require considerable judgment and are sensitive to changes in underlying assumptions, estimates and market factors. Estimating the fair value of individual reporting units and indefinite-lived intangible assets requires us to make assumptions and estimates regarding our future plans, as well as industry and economic conditions. These assumptions and estimates include projected revenues and income growth rates, terminal growth rates, competitive and consumer trends, market-based discount rates, and other market factors. If current expectations of future growth rates are not met or market factors outside of our control, such as discount rates, change significantly, this may lead to a further goodwill impairment in the future. Acquired in-process research and development (IPR&D) are intangible assets initially recognized at fair value and classified as indefinite-lived assets until the successful completion or abandonment of the associated research and development efforts. During the development period, these assets will not be amortized as charges to earnings; instead these assets will be tested for impairment on an annual basis or more frequently if impairment indicators are identified. Based on the results of our impairment test, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $2,300,000 during the year ended December 31, 2017. In connection with each annual impairment assessment and any interim impairment assessment in which indicators of impairment have been identified, we compare the fair value of the asset as of the date of the assessment with the carrying value of the asset on the consolidated balance sheet. If impairment is indicatd by this test, the intangible asset is written down by the amount by which the discounted cash flows expected from the intangible asset exceeds its carrying value.

Additionally, as goodwill and intangible assets associated with recently acquired businesses are recorded on the balance sheet at their estimated acquisition date fair values, those amounts are more susceptible to an impairment risk if business operating results or macroeconomic conditions deteriorate.

In connection with each annual impairment assessment and any interim impairment assessment in which indicators of impairment have been identified, we compare the fair value of the asset as of the date of the assessment with the carrying value of the asset on the consolidated balance sheet. If impairment is indicatd by this test, the intangible asset is written down by the amount by which the discounted cash flows expected from the intangible asset exceeds its carrying value.

~~Accrued Research and Development Expenses~~

As part of the process of preparing our financial statements, we are required to estimate accrued research and development expenses. Estimated accrued expenses include fees paid to vendors and clinical sites in connection with our clinical trials and studies. We review new and open contracts and communicate with applicable internal and vendor personnel to identify services that have been performed on our behalf and estimate the level of service performed and the associated costs incurred for the service when we have not yet been invoiced or otherwise notified of the actual cost for accrued expenses. The majority of our service providers invoice us monthly in arrears for services performed or as milestones are achieved in relation to our contract manufacturers. We make estimates of our accrued expenses as of each reporting date.

~~The Company expenses the total cost of a certain long-term manufacturing development contract ratably over the estimated life of the contract, or the total amount paid if greater.~~

~~Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation~~

Beginning in the second quarter of 2014, we awarded options and restricted stock units. We measure stock-based awards granted to employees and directors at fair value on the date of grant and recognize the corresponding compensation expense of the awards, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service periods, which correspond to the vesting periods of the awards. The Company revalues non-employee options each reporting period using the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the last day of each reporting period.

~~Key Assumptions.~~ Our Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the fair value of the underlying common stock, the expected volatility of the price of our common stock, the expected term of the option, risk-free interest rates and the expected dividend yield of our common stock. These estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. If factors change and different assumptions are used, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future. These assumptions are estimated as follows:

· ~~Fair value of our common stock—Our common stock is valued by reference to the publicly-traded price of our common stock.~~

· Expected volatility—As we do not have any trading history for our common stock, the expected stock price volatility for our common stock was estimated by taking the average historic price volatility for industry peers based on daily price observations for common stock values over a period equivalent to the expected term of our stock option grants. We did not rely on implied volatilities of traded options in our industry peers’ common stock because the volume of activity was relatively low. We intend to continue to consistently apply this process using the same or similar public companies until a sufficient amount of historical information regarding the volatility of our own common stock share price becomes available.

· Expected term—The expected term represents the period that our stock-based awards are expected to be outstanding. It is based on the “simplified method” for developing the estimate of the expected life of a “plain vanilla” stock option. Under this approach, the expected term is presumed to be the midpoint between the average vesting date and the end of the contractual term for each vesting tranche. We intend to continue to apply this process until a sufficient amount of historical exercise activity is available to be able to reliably estimate the expected term.

· ~~Risk-free interest rate—The risk-free interest rate is based on the yields of U.S. Treasury securities with maturities similar to the expected term of the options for each option group.~~

· ~~Dividend yield—We have never declared or paid any cash dividends and do not presently plan to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, we used an expected dividend yield of zero.~~

· Forfeitures—We estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and revise those estimates periodically in subsequent periods. We use historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and record stock-based compensation expense only for those awards that are expected to vest.

~~Common Stock Valuations.~~ Prior to our IPO, the fair value of the common stock underlying our stock options was determined by our board of directors, which intended all options granted to be exercisable at a price per share not less than the per share fair value of our common stock underlying those options on the date of grant. The valuations of our common stock were determined in accordance with the guidelines outlined in the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants Practice Aid, Valuation of Privately-Held-Company Equity Securities Issued as Compensation. The assumptions we used in the valuation model are highly complex and subjective. We base our assumptions on future expectations combined with management judgment. In the absence of a public trading market, our board of directors, with input from management, exercised significant judgment and considered numerous objective and subjective factors to determine the fair value of our common stock as of the date of each option grant and stock award. These judgments and factors will not be necessary to determine the fair value of new awards once the underlying shares begin trading. For now we included the following factors:

· ~~the prices, rights, preferences and privileges of our Series A preferred stock relative to those of our common stock;~~

· ~~lack of marketability of our common stock;~~

· ~~our actual operating and financial performance;~~

· ~~current business conditions and projections;~~

· ~~hiring of key personnel and the experience of our management;~~

· ~~our stage of development;~~

· ~~illiquidity of share-based awards involving securities in a private company;~~

· ~~the U.S. capital market conditions; and~~

· ~~the likelihood of achieving a liquidity event, such as an offering or a merger or acquisition of our company given prevailing market conditions.~~

The fair market value per share of our common stock for purposes of determining stock-based compensation is now the closing price of our common stock as reported on The NASDAQ Stock Market on the applicable grant date.

~~Classification of Securities~~

We apply the principles of ASC 480-10 “Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity” and ASC 815-40 “Derivatives and Hedging—Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity” to determine whether financial instruments such as warrants, contingently issuable shares and shares subject to repurchase should be classified as liabilities or equity and whether beneficial conversion features exist. Financial instruments such as warrants that are evaluated to be classified as liabilities are fair valued upon issuance and are remeasured at fair value at subsequent reporting periods with the resulting change in fair value recorded in other income/(expense). The fair value of warrants is estimated using the Black Scholes Merton model and requires the input of subjective assumptions including expected stock price volatility and expected life.

~~Income Taxes~~

As of December 31, 2017, the Company had federal and state net operating loss carryovers of approximately $20,777,790 and $21,432,738, respectively The federal and state net operating losses will begin to expire in 2033. Our management has evaluated the factors bearing upon the realizability of our deferred tax assets, which are comprised principally of net operating loss carryforwards. Our management concluded that, due to the uncertainty of realizing any tax benefits as of December 31, 2017, a valuation allowance was necessary to fully offset our deferred tax assets. We have evaluated our uncertain tax positions and determined that we have no liabilities from unrecognized tax benefits and therefore we have not incurred any penalties or interest. The Tax Reform Act of 1986, as amended, limits the use of net operating loss and tax credit carryforward in certain situations where changes occur in the stock ownership of a company. Utilization of the domestic NOL and tax credit forwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to ownership change limitations that may have occurred or that could occur in the future, as required by the Internal Revenue Code Section 382, as well as similar state provisions.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~

In July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-11, “Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, (Part II) Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-controlling Interests with a Scope Exception” (“ASU 2017-11”), which addresses the complexity of accounting for certain financial instruments with down round features. Down round features are features of certain equity-linked instruments (or embedded features) that result in the strike price being reduced on the basis of the pricing of future equity offerings. Current accounting guidance creates cost and complexity for entities that issue financial instruments (such as warrants and convertible instruments) with down round features that require fair value measurement of the entire instrument or conversion option. The amendments in Part I of this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2017-11 on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting” (“ASU 2017-09”), which provides guidance on determining which changes to the terms and conditions of share-based payment awards require an entity to apply modification accounting under Topic 718. The amendments in this ASU are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for (1) public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, “Other Income—Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20): Clarifying the Scope of Asset Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of Nonfinancial Assets” (“ASU 2017-05”), which clarifies the scope of the nonfinancial asset guidance in Subtopic 610-20. This ASU also clarifies that the derecognition of all businesses and nonprofit activities (except those related to conveyances of oil and gas mineral rights or contracts with customers) should be accounted for in accordance with the derecognition and deconsolidation guidance in Subtopic 810-10. The amendments in this ASU also provide guidance on the accounting for what often are referred to as partial sales of nonfinancial assets within the scope of Subtopic 610-20 and contributions of nonfinancial assets to a joint venture or other noncontrolled investee. The amendments in this ASU are effective for annual reporting reports beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Public entities may apply the guidance earlier but only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In October 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-16, Accounting for Income Taxes: Intra-Entitiy Asset Transfers of Assets Other than Inventory. Under current GAAP, the tax effects of intra-entity asset transfers (intercompany sales) are deferred until the transferred asset is sold to a third party or otherwise recovered through use. This is an exception to the principle in ASC 740, Income Taxes, that generally requires comprehensive recognition of current and deferred income taxes. The new guidance eliminates the exception for all intra-entity sales of assets other than inventory. As a result, a reporting entity would recognize the tax expense from the sale of the asset in the seller’s tax jurisdiction when the transfer occurs, even though the pre-tax effects of that transaction are eliminated in consolidation. Any deferred tax asset that arises in the buyer’s jurisdiction would also be recognized at the time of the transfer. The new guidance does not apply to intra-entity transfers of inventory. The ASU will be effective for public business entities in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those years. ~~The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.~~

In August 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses the following cash flow issues: (1) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; (2) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; (3) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; (4) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; (5) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; (6) distributions received from equity method investees; (7) beneficial interests in securitization transactions; and (8) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. The amendments in this ASU are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those fiscal years and are effective for all other entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016 the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07, Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): Simplifying the Transition to the Equity Method of Accounting. This new standard eliminates the requirement that when an investment qualifies for use of the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an adjustment must be made to the investment, results of operations and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by-step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment has been held. ASU 2016-07 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this guidance on January 1, 2018 and such adoption did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which provides guidance for accounting for leases. Under ASU 2016-02, the Company will be required to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leased assets. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)” (ASU 2014-09), and subsequently issued modifications or clarifications in ASU No. 2015-14, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date,” ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” and ASU No. 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients.” The revenue recognition principle in ASU 2014-09 and the related guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 prescribes a five-step process for evaluating contracts and determining revenue recognition. In addition, new and enhanced disclosures are required. Companies may adopt the new standard either using the full retrospective approach, a modified retrospective approach with practical expedients, or a cumulative effect upon adoption approach. The Company has completed the process of evaluating the effects of the adoption of Topic 606 and determined that the timing and measurement of our revenues under the new standard is similar to that recognized under the previous revenue guidance. Similar to the current guidance, the Company will need to make significant estimates related to variable consideration at the point of sale, including chargebacks, rebates and product returns. Revenue will be recognized at a point in time upon the transfer of control of the Company’s products, which occurs upon delivery for substantially all of the Company’s sales. The Company adopted the new revenue guidance effective January 1, 2018, by recognizing the cumulative effect of initially applying the new standard as an increase to the opening balance of retained earnings as prescribed by the modified retrospective method of adoption. The adoption of ASU 2014-09, ASU 2016-10 and ASU 2016-12 did not have a material impact on Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

JOBS Act

In April 2012, the JOBS Act was enacted. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this extended transition period, and, as a result, we will adopt new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for other public companies.

Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not applicable.

Item 4.Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

~~We maintain “disclosure~~Our management, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures” as ~~such~~of March 31,2019. The term is"disclosure controls and procedures," as defined in ~~Rule~~Rules 13a-15(e) and ~~15d-15(c)~~15d-15(e) under the ~~Securities~~ Exchange Act, means controls and other procedures of ~~1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”),~~a company that are

Table of Contents

designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in ~~Securities and Exchange Commission~~the SEC's rules and ~~forms,~~forms.

Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that ~~such~~ information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. ~~In designing~~Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and ~~evaluating~~Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures ~~management recognized~~were not comprehensively effective at the reasonable assurance level as of March 31, 2019. This conclusion was based on the material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting further described below.

Material Weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that ~~disclosure~~there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected and corrected on a timely basis. In connection with our preparation of our annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2018, we identified a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to staff turnover in our accounting department. We did not maintain a sufficient complement of internal personnel with appropriate knowledge, experience and/or training commensurate with our financial reporting requirements. We relied on outside consulting technical experts and did not maintain adequate internal qualified personnel to properly supervise and review the information provided by the outside consulting technical experts to ensure certain significant complex transactions and technical matters were properly accounted for, specifically with respect to accurately reflecting all potential accrued services on the balance sheet at December 31, 2018. In addition, we identified inadequate internal technical staffing levels and expertise to properly supervise and review the information of the outside consulting technical experts to properly apply ASC 815-40 for liability classification of certain warrants and ASC 470-50 and ASC 470-60 to properly reflect the accounting impact to multiple modifications of the Company’s debt instruments. We have concluded that we must implement new or improved controls in our financial statement close process and ~~procedures, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance~~policies in reviewing information received from our outside consulting technical experts.

Remediation Efforts to Address Material Weakness

We have prepared a preliminary remediation plan to address the underlying causes of the material weakness described above. The preliminary remediation plan includes:

Reassessing the design and operation of internal controls over financial reporting, including interim and annual accruals cutoff procedures and review procedures related to information received from our outside consulting technical experts;

Hiring and training of permanent accounting personnel to further educate the staff on the accounting of significant complex transactions and technical accounting matters;

Increasing staffing levels and expertise to implement this remediation plan

We cannot assure you that the ~~objectives of the disclosure controls and procedures are met. Our disclosure controls and procedures have been designed~~measures we may take in response to ~~meet reasonable assurance standards. Additionally, in designing disclosure controls and procedures, our management necessarily was required~~this material weakness will be sufficient to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible disclosure controls and procedures. The design of any disclosure controls and procedures also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under allremediate such material weakness or to avoid potential future ~~conditions.~~material weaknesses.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form ~~10-Q,~~10‑Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and

Table of Contents

procedures were not effective due to the existence of a material weakness in the design ~~and operating effectiveness of an internal control related to review~~ of our ~~tax provision. This conclusion was based on the material weakness in our~~ internal ~~control~~controls over financial reporting ~~further described below.~~

relating to staff turnover in our accounting department.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements will not be prevented or detected in a timely basis. In connection with the audit of our financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, we did not adequately and timely review the accounting for income taxes. While we utilize the assistance of an external income tax specialist to prepare our annual tax provision, management has concluded there to be a material weakness in the design of our income tax controls in that our policy that governs the data validation controls over data provided to and received from the external income tax specialist and the management review controls were not designed with appropriate levels of precision and were not undertaken in a timely manner, which resulted in an extension to file our Annual Report on Form 10-K. We plan to enhance existing controls and design and implement new controls applicable to ~~our tax accounting,~~staff, to ensure that our ~~income tax balances are~~staff is accurately ~~calculated~~trained to properly understand and ~~appropriately reflected in our~~review financial ~~statements on a timely basis.~~transactions. We plan to devote significant time and attention to remediate the above material weakness as soon as reasonably possible. As we continue to evaluate our controls, we will make the necessary changes to improve the overall design and operation of our controls. We believe these actions will be sufficient to remediate the identified material weakness and strengthen our internal control over financial reporting; however, there can be no guarantee that such remediation will be sufficient. We will continue to monitor the effectiveness of our controls and will make any further changes management determines appropriate.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form ~~10-Q~~10‑Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II. — OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

On July 20, 2017, a putative class action complaint was filed in the United States District Court, Northern District of California, Civil Action No. 3:~~17-cv-04102,~~17‑cv‑04102, by Tony Plant (the “Plaintiff”) on behalf of shareholders of the Company who held shares on ~~June 30,~~April 12, 2017 and were entitled to vote at the 2017 Special Shareholders Meeting, against the Company and certain individuals who were directors as of the date of the vote (collectively, the “Defendants”), in a matter captioned Tony Plant v. Jaguar Animal Health, Inc., et al., making claims arising under Section 14(a) and Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act and Rule ~~14a-9,~~14a‑9, 17 C.F.R. § ~~240.14a-9,~~240.14a‑9, promulgated thereunder by the SEC. The claims ~~allege~~alleged false and misleading information provided to investors in the Joint Proxy Statement/Prospectus on Form ~~S-4~~S‑4 (File No. ~~333-217364)~~333‑217364) declared effective by the Commission on July 6, 2017 related to the solicitation of votes from shareholders to approve the merger and certain transactions related thereto. The Company accepted service of the complaint and summons on behalf of itself and the United States-based director Defendants on November 1, 2017. The Company has not accepted service on behalf of, and Plaintiff has not yet served, the non-U.S.-based director Defendants. On October 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking appointment as lead plaintiff and appointment of Monteverde & Associates PC as lead counsel. That motion ~~has been~~was granted. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint against the Company and the United States-based director Defendants on January 10, 2018. The Defendants filed a motion to dismiss on March 12, 2018, for which oral arguments were held on June 14, 2018. The court dismissed the complaint on September 20, 2018. Plaintiff was entitled to amend the complaint within 20 days from the date of dismissal. On October 10, 2018, Plaintiff amended the complaint to focus on the Company’s commercial strategy in support of Equilevia and the related disclosure statements in the Form S-4 described above. On November 6, 2018, the Defendants moved to dismiss the second amended complaint. The Defendants argue in their motion that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted because the omissions and misrepresentations alleged in the complaint are immaterial as a matter of law. Plaintiff’s memorandum of law in opposition to the Defendants’ motion to dismiss is due on December 21, 2018. If the Plaintiff were able to prove its allegations in this matter and to establish the damages it asserts, then an adverse ruling could have a material impact on the Company. However, the Company disputes the claims asserted in this putative class action case and is vigorously contesting the matter. On March 12, 2018, the Defendants moved to dismiss the amended complaint for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. The Company believes that it is not probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred as of the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the amount of any potential loss is not reasonably estimable. ~~The court has ordered a briefing schedule on the motion to dismiss and has tentatively set a hearing date of June 14, 2018.~~

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

In January 2018, pursuant to a consulting agreement dated August 14, 2017, we issued 50,000 shares of our common stock to Investor Awareness, Inc. as partial consideration for financial public relations services rendered.

In January 2018, pursuant to a share purchase agreement dated January 18, 2018, we issued 9,215,900 shares of our common stock to certain investors for gross proceeds of approximately $954,000. We used net proceeds from the offering for commercialization activities relating to the launch of Mytesi, our FDA-approved human health product, and general corporate purposes.

In January through March ~~2018, through a series of partial redemptions pursuant to the terms of the Secured Convertible Promissory Note issued to~~31, 2019, Jaguar entered into exchange agreements with Chicago Venture Partners L.P. ~~(the “CVP Note”) as disclosed in our Form 8-K filed with~~pursuant to which the ~~SEC on July 3, 2017, we~~Company issued ~~8,542,637~~18,764,637 shares of common stock in the aggregate to ~~redeem $950,000~~CVP in exchange for a reduction of approximately $4.37 million in the principal amount of the CVP ~~Note, including accrued and unpaid interest thereon.~~

Notes. The shares of common stock that were exchanged for portions of the secured promissory notes were issued in reliance on the exemption from registration provided under Section 3(a)(9) of the Securities Act.

On March ~~23, 2018,~~18, 2019, Jaguar began entering into securities purchase agreements (each, a “Securities Purchase Agreement”) with selected accredited investors (each, an “Investor”), pursuant to a stock purchase agreement, we issued 5,524,926 shares of our Series A Convertible Participating Preferred Stock, $0.0001 par value per share, to Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. for gross proceeds of $9,199,001. Thewhich the Company intends to ~~use~~issue up to $5.5 million aggregate principal amount of promissory notes (collectively, the “Notes”) to such Investors. As an inducement for entering into the Securities Purchase Agreement, each Investor also received warrants exercisable for shares of common stock (the “Investor Warrants”). The offering closed on March 18, 2019, and $800,000 aggregate principal amount of Notes were issued in offerings and the proceeds from such offerings were paid to the ~~offering for ongoing commercialization activities for Mytesi and general corporate purposes.~~

On March 23, 2018, pursuant to share purchase agreements, we issued 29,411,766 shares of our common stock to certain investors for gross proceeds of approximately $5 million. We used net proceeds from the offering to repay certain aged payables relating to our acquisition of Napo in July 2017.

Company.

The offers, sales, and issuances of the securities described above were deemed to be exempt from registration under the Securities Act in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act, Regulation D or Regulation S promulgated thereunder as transactions by an issuer not involving a public offering. The recipients of securities in each of these transactions acquired the securities for investment only and not with a view to or for sale in connection with any distribution thereof and appropriate legends were affixed to the securities issued in these transactions. Each of the

Table of Contents

recipients of securities in these transactions was an accredited or sophisticated person and had adequate access, through employment, business or other relationships, to information about us.

~~Other than as provided above and the shares~~

Table of our common stock sold pursuant to the common stock purchase agreement with L2 Capital, LLC, as disclosed on our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 24, 2017, there were no unregistered sales of equity securities during the period.Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

~~Exhibit No.~~		~~Description~~
~~3.1~~
Exhibit No.		Description
3.1		Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Jaguar Health, Inc. (f/k/a Jaguar Animal Health, Inc.) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Current Report on Form ~~8-K~~8‑K (No. ~~001-36714)~~001‑36714) filed on August 1, 2017).
3.2		Certificate of Second Amendment of the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 8‑K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed June 1, 2018, File No. 001‑36714).
3.3		Certificate of Third Amendment of the Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the ~~Annual Report on~~ Form ~~10-K (No. 001-36714)~~8‑K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed ~~with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 9, 2018)~~June 1, 2018, File No. 001‑36714).
~~3.3~~ 3.4		Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Designation of Series A Convertible Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the ~~Current Report on~~ Form 8-K ~~(filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on~~of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March ~~27, 2018)~~15, 2019, File No. 001-36714).
4.1		~~Secured Promissory Note, dated February 26, 2018, by and between~~Specimen Common Stock Certificate of Jaguar Health, Inc. ~~and Chicago Venture Partners, L.P.~~ (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form ~~8-K~~8‑K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed ~~March 2,~~June 1, 2018, File No. ~~001-36714)~~001‑36714).
4.2		Secured Promissory Note, dated March 21, 2018, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and Chicago Venture Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 27, 2018, File No. 001-36714).
~~10.1~~		Form of ~~Second Amended Original Issue Discount Exchangeable~~75% Coverage Promissory Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8‑K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 22, 2019, File No. 001‑36714).
4.3		Form of 125% Coverage Promissory Note (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8‑K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 22, 2019, File No. 001‑36714).
4.4		Form of Common Stock Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Form 8‑K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 22, 2019, File No. 001‑36714).
4.5		Form of Placement Agent Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8‑K/A of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 26, 2019, File No. 001‑36714).
4.6		Form of LOC Common Stock Warrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8‑K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed April 4, 2019, File No. 001‑36714).
10.1		Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated January 7, 2019, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and Oasis Capital, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed ~~February 16, 2018,~~January 8, 2019, File No. 001-36714).
10.2		~~Second Amendment~~Form of Securities Purchase Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the ~~Note~~Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 22, 2019, File No. 001-36714).
10.3		Form of Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 22, 2019, File No. 001-36714).
10.4		Securities Purchase Agreement, ~~and Notes and Payoff Agreement,~~ dated ~~February 16, 2018,~~March 24, 2019, by and ~~among~~between Jaguar Health, Inc. and the ~~purchasers~~Investor (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 25, 2019, File No. 001-36714).
10.5		Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated April 1, 2019, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and Oasis Capital, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed April 1, 2019, File No. 001-36714).
10.6		Letter of Credit Cancellation & Warrant Issuance Agreement, dated March 29, 2019, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and the letter of credit beneficiary named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed ~~February 16, 2018,~~April 4, 2019, File No. 001-36714).
~~10.3~~		Consent and Payoff Agreement, dated February 27, 2018, by and between Napo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and the purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed February 28, 2018, File No. 001-36714).
~~10.4~~		Securities Purchase Agreement, dated February 26, 2018, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and Chicago Venture Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 2, 2018, File No. 001-36714).
~~10.5~~		Security Agreement, dated February 26, 2018, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and Chicago Venture Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 2, 2018, File No. 001-36714).
~~10.6~~		Series A Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 23, 2018, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 27, 2018, File No. 001-36714).
~~10.7~~		Registration Rights Agreement, dated March 23, 2018, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and Sagard Capital Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 27, 2018, File No. 001-36714).
~~10.8~~		Form of Common Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 23, 2018, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and the purchasers named therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 27, 2018, File No. 001-36714).
~~10.9~~		Management Services Agreement, dated March 23, 2018, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and Sagard Capital Partners Management Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 27, 2018, File No. 001-36714).
~~10.10~~		Securities Purchase Agreement, dated March 21, 2018, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and Chicago Venture Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 27, 2018, File No. 001-36714).
~~10.11~~		Security Agreement, dated March 21, 2018, by and between Jaguar Health, Inc. and Chicago Venture Partners, L.P. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Form 8-K of Jaguar Health, Inc. filed March 27, 2018, File No. 001-36714).
31.1*		Principal Executive ~~Officer’s~~Officer's Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes- Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*		Principal Financial ~~Officer’s~~Officer's Certification Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1**		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
32.2**		Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350 (Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Table of Contents

* Filed herewith.

** In accordance with Item 601(b)(32)(ii) of Regulation S-K and SEC Release No. ~~34-47986,~~34‑47986, the certifications furnished in Exhibits 32.1 and 32.2 hereto are deemed to accompany this Form ~~10-Q~~10‑Q and will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) or deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act of 1933 except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May ~~15, 2018~~21, 2019
	JAGUAR HEALTH, INC.

	By:	/s/ Karen S. Wright
		Karen S. Wright
		Chief Financial Officer
		Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

	Series A Convertible Preferred Stock				Common Stock			Common Stock - Non-voting					Additional Paid-in						Total Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount			Shares	Amount		Shares		Amount			Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Equity (Deficit)

Balances - December 31, 2016	—	$	—		14,007,132	$	1,401	—		$	—		$	37,980,522		$	(40,436,108	)	$	(2,454,185	)

Issuance of common stock in association with a June 2016 private investment in public entities offering, net of offering costs of $72,710	—	—			3,972,510	397		—		—			2,313,977			—			2,314,374

Issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities offering, net of offering costs of $6,000 June 2017	—	—			200,000	20		—		—			93,980			—			94,000

Issuance of common stock through a stock purchase agreement with a private investor, net of offering costs of $44,738 November 2017	—	—			5,100,000	510		—		—			554,752			—			555,262

Issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities offering	—	—			4,010,000	401		—		—			400,599			—			401,000

Issuance of common stock in the merger	—	—			2,282,445	228		—		—			1,277,941			—			1,278,169
Issuance of common stock in a July 2017 CSPA	—	—			3,243,243	325		—		—			2,999,675			—			3,000,000
Issuance of common stock in a follow-on offering registration statement October 2017, net of commissions and offering costs of $763,502	—	—			21,687,500	2,169		—		—			3,571,829			—			3,573,998
Issuance of common stock - non-voting in the merger	—	—			—	—		43,173,288		4,317			24,172,725			—			24,177,042
Conversion of non-voting common stock to common stock	—	—			555,395	55		(555,395	)	(55		)	—			—			—
Issuance of warrants in the merger	—	—			—	—		—		—			630,859			—			630,859

Issuance of stock options in the merger	—	—			—	—		—		—			5,691			—			5,691

Issuance of RSUs in the merger	—	—			—	—		—		—			3,300,555			—			3,300,555

Issuance of common stock in exchange for warrants	—	—			908,334	91		—		—			386,243			—			386,334

Stock-based compensation	—	—			—	—		—		—			814,613			—			814,613

Warrants, issued in conjunction with debt extinguishment	—	—			—	—		—		—			207,713			—			207,713

Issuance of common stock in exchange for vested restricted stock units	—	—			13,703	1		—		—			(1		)	—			—

Issuance of common stock in exchange for redemption of convertible debt	—	—			6,492,084	649		—		—			899,713			—			900,362

Issuance of common stock in exchange for services	—	—			235,134	24		—		—			43,805			—			43,829

Net and comprehensive loss	—	—			—	—		—		—			—			(21,968,614		)	(21,968,614		)

Balances - December 31, 2017	—	$	—		62,707,480	$	6,271	42,617,893		$	4,262		$	79,655,191		$	(62,404,722	)	$	17,261,002

Issuance of preferred stock and common stock in a private investment in public entities March 2018	5,524,926	$	9,000,002		29,411,766	2,940		—		—			4,997,060			—			5,000,000

Beneficial conversion feature of the series A convertible preferred stock	—	(995,000		)	—	—		—		—			995,000			—			995,000

Deemed dividend on the series A convertible preferred stock	—	995,000			—	—		—		—			(995,000		)	—			(995,000		)

Issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities November 2017	—	—			9,746,413	975		—		—			1,304,799			—			1,305,774

Issuance of common stock in a private investment in public entities January 2018	—	—			7,182,818	718		—		—			749,382			—			750,100

Issuance of common stock in exchange for redemption of convertible debt	—	—			12,314,291	1,232		—		—			1,402,781			—			1,404,013

Issuance of common stock in exchange for services	—	—			50,000	5		—		—			6,420			—			6,425

Issuance of common stock in exchange for payment of interest expense	—	—			4,285,423	429		—		—			704,296			—			704,725

Stock-based compensation	—	—			—	—		—		—			272,243			—			272,243

Net and comprehensive loss	—	—			—	—		—		—			—			(5,696,637		)	(5,696,637		)

Balances - March 31, 2018	5,524,926	$	9,000,002		125,698,191	$	12,570	42,617,893		$	4,262		$	89,092,172		$	(68,101,359	)	$	21,007,645

	March 31, 2018		March 31, 2017
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,808,324	$	1,205,061
Restricted cash	—		21,192
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	7,808,324	$	1,226,253


	December 31, 2018	Adoption Impact	January 1, 2019
		(unaudited)
Operating lease right-of-use assets	—	1,111,214	1,111,214
Operating leases liabilities, current portion	—	336,647	336,647
Operating leases liabilities, long term	—	394,703	394,703
Deferred rent	379,864	(379,864)	—

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2018			2017
Revenue from external customers
Human Health	$	583,269		$	—
Animal Health	43,698			822,410
Consolidated Totals	$	626,967		$	822,410
Interest expense
Human Health	$	105,891		$	—
Animal Health	496,131			180,072
Consolidated Totals	$	602,022		$	180,072
Depreciation and amortization
Human Health	$	314,530		$	—
Animal Health	15,031			15,031
Consolidated Totals	$	329,561		$	15,031
Segment profit
Human Health	$	(2,899,306	)	$	—
Animal Health	(2,797,331		)	(4,715,358		)
Consolidated Totals	$	(5,696,637	)	$	(4,715,358	)

	As of March 31,		As of December 31,
	2018		2017
Segment assets
Human Health	$	41,520,244	$	41,754,603
Animal Health	50,982,480		36,807,184
Total	$	92,502,724	$	78,561,787

	(Unaudited)
Fair value of Jaguar common stock	$	25,303,859
Fair value of Jaguar common stock warrants	630,859
Fair value of replacement restricted stock units	3,300,555
Fair value of replacement stock options	5,691
Cash	2,000,000
Effective settlement of receivable from Napo	464,295
Total consideration exchanged	$	31,705,259

Current assets	$	2,578,114
Non-current assets	396,247
Identifiable intangible assets	36,400,000
Current liabilities	(4,052,180		)
Convertible notes payable	(12,473,501		)
Deferred tax liability	(13,181,242		)
Net assets acquired	9,667,438
Goodwill on acquisition	22,037,821
Total consideration	$	31,705,259

	March 31, 2018
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Warrant liability	$	—	$	—	$	192,960	$	192,960
Derivative liability	—		—		15,000		15,000
Conversion option liability	—		—		—		—
Total fair value	$	—	$	—	$	207,960	$	207,960

	For The Three Months Ended
	March 31, 2018							March 31, 2017
	Warrant		Derivative		Conversion Option			Warrant
	liability		Liability		Liability			liability
Beginning fair value of level 3 liability	$	103,860	$	11,000	$	111,841		$	799,201
Extinguishment	—		—		(286,595		)	—
Change in fair value of level 3 liability	89,100		4,000		174,754			453,419
Ending fair value of level 3 liability	$	192,960	$	15,000	$	—		$	1,252,620

	March 31,
	2017
Due from former parent	$	221,429
Royalty payable to former parent	(7		)
Net receivable (payable) to former parent	$	221,422

Years ending December 31,	Amount
2018	$	153,705
Total minimum lease payments	$	153,705

	Notes Payable
	March 31,			December 31,
	2018			2017
December 2017 note payable	$	1,587,500		$	1,587,500
February 2018 note payable	2,240,909			—
March 2018 note payable	1,090,341			—
	4,918,750			1,587,500
Less: unamortized net discount and debt issuance costs	(1,262,651		)	(446,347		)
Net convertible notes payable obligation	$	3,656,099		$	1,141,153

	Three Months Ended	Year Ended
	March 31,	December 31,
	2018	2017
	(in shares)
Beginning balance	4,820,025	5,968,876
Warrants granted	—	1,595,791
Warrants exercised	—	(908,334	)
Warrants cancelled	—	(1,836,308	)
Ending balance	4,820,025	4,820,025

						Weighted		Weighted Average	Aggregate
	Shares					Average		Remaining	Intrinsic
	Available		Stock Options		RSUs	Stock Option		Contractual Life	Value
	for Grant		Outstanding		Outstanding	Exercise Price		(Years)	*
Combined Incentive Plan Balance—December 31, 2017	53,026		3,444,663		5,893,849	$	1.87	8.31	$	—

Additional shares authorized	43,166,507
Options granted	(12,767,961	)	12,767,961
Options cancelled	534,494		(566,570	)

Combined Incentive Plan Balance—March 31, 2018	30,986,066		15,646,054		5,893,849	$	0.84	1.65	$	51,247
Options vested and exercisable—March 31, 2018			1,615,043			$	3.06	3.06	$	49,927
Options vested and expected to vest—March 31, 2018			12,711,812			$	0.88	9.07	$	50,902