UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: ~~September 30, 2015~~
March 31, 2016

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________.

Commission File No. 000-24657

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Texas		75-2508900
(State or other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		~~(I.R.S.~~(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

600 S. Royal Lane, Suite 200, Coppell, Texas		75019
~~(Address~~(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		~~(Zip~~(Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code: (972) 471-7400

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒S No ☐£

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ~~☒ No☐~~S No £

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “accelerated filer”, “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐£

Accelerated filer ☐£

Non-accelerated filer ☐£

Smaller reporting company ☒S

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)~~. Yes ☐~~.Yes £ No ☒S

As of ~~October 31, 2015,~~April 29, 2016, the number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s sole class of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, was ~~2,681,078.~~2,706,986.

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements	1
Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements	2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2014~~2015	2
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~ (unaudited)	3
Consolidated ~~Statements~~Statement of Comprehensive Income for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~ (unaudited)	3
Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Shareholders’ Equity as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 (unaudited) and December 31, ~~2014~~2015	4
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~ (unaudited)	5
Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	6

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Company Overview	17
Results of Operations	18
~~Company Overview~~	18
~~Results of Operations~~	19
Liquidity and Capital Resources	2824
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates	3026
Recent Accounting Pronouncements	3430

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3530

Item 4. Controls and Procedures	3631

Part II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	3732

Item 1A. Risk Factors	3732

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3732

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3732

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures	3732

Item 5. Other Information	3732

Item 6. Exhibits	3732

Signatures	3833

Table of Contents

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain disclosures and analyses in this Form 10-Q, including information incorporated by reference, may include forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that are subject to various risks and uncertainties. Opinions, forecasts, projections, guidance, or other statements other than statements of historical fact are considered forward-looking statements and reflect only current views about future events and financial performance. Some of these forward-looking statements include statements regarding:

management’s plans and objectives for future operations;

existing cash flows being adequate to fund future operational needs;

future plans related to budgets, future capital requirements, market share growth, and anticipated capital projects and obligations;

the realization of net deferred tax assets;

the ability to curtail operating expenditures;

global statutory tax rates remaining unchanged;

the impact of future market changes due to exposure to foreign currency translations;

the possibility of certain policies, procedures, and internal processes minimizing exposure to market risk;

the impact of new accounting pronouncements on financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows;

the outcome of new or existing litigation matters;

the outcome of new or existing regulatory inquiries or investigations; and

other assumptions described in this report underlying such forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations included in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, these forward-looking statements are subject to certain events, risks, assumptions, and uncertainties, including those discussed below, the “Risk Factors” section in Part I, Item 1A of our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, and the “Risk Factors” section in Part II, Item 1A of this Form 10-Q, and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and the documents incorporated by reference herein. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect, actual results and developments could materially differ from those expressed in or implied by such forward-looking statements. For example, any of the following factors could cause actual results to vary materially from our projections:

overall growth or lack of growth in the nutritional supplements industry;

plans for expected future product development;

changes in manufacturing costs;

shifts in the mix of packs and products;

the future impact of any changes to global associate career and compensation plans or ~~incentives;~~incentives or the regulations thereto;

the ability to attract and retain independent associates and members;

new regulatory changes that may affect operations, products or ~~products;~~compensation plans or incentives;

the competitive nature of our business with respect to products and pricing;

publicity related to our products or network-marketing; and

the political, social, and economic climate.

Forward-looking statements generally can be identified by use of phrases or terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expects,” “plans,” “intends,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “approximates,” “predicts,” “projects,” “potential,” and “continues” or other similar words or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. Similarly, descriptions of Mannatech’s objectives, strategies, plans, goals, or targets contained herein are also considered forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned when considering these forward-looking statements to keep in mind these risks, assumptions, and uncertainties and any other cautionary statements in this report, as all of the forward-looking statements contained herein speak only as of the date of this report.

Unless stated otherwise, all financial information throughout this report and in the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes include Mannatech, Incorporated and all of its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis and may be referred to herein as “Mannatech,” “the Company,” “its,” “we,” “our,” or “their.”

Our products are not intended to diagnose, cure, treat, or prevent any disease, and any statements about our products contained in this report have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration, also referred to herein as the “FDA”.

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

~~(in~~ (in thousands,, except share and per share amounts)

							March 31, 2016 (unaudited)			December 31, 2015
ASSETS	September 30, 2015 (unaudited)			December 31, 2014
Cash and cash equivalents	$	35,292		$	27,999		$	33,581		$	31,994
Restricted cash		1,512			1,511			1,513			1,511
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $249 and $213 in 2015 and 2014, respectively		272			504
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $413 and $261 in 2016 and 2015, respectively								219			369
Income tax receivable		20			4			8			4
Inventories, net		11,398			10,591			11,228			9,199
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2,981			3,069			3,998			2,905
Deferred commissions		4,210			4,544			3,969			3,443
Deferred tax assets, net		1,026			1,141			430			460
Total current assets		56,711			49,363			54,946			49,885
Property and equipment, net		4,092			2,481			3,617			3,848
Construction in progress		660			1,622			1,362			839
Long-term restricted cash		6,459			7,045			6,741			6,586
Other assets		3,943			3,567			3,878			3,759
Long-term deferred tax assets, net		3,468			3,320			3,766			3,725
Total assets	$	75,333		$	67,398		$	74,310		$	68,642
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current portion of capital leases	$	446		$	901		$	418		$	447
Accounts payable		4,339			4,252			5,617			2,683
Accrued expenses		7,804			6,356			4,698			6,221
Commissions and incentives payable		9,840			7,908			7,628			6,818
Taxes payable		1,822			2,578			1,489			736
Current deferred tax liability		119			123			85			84
Current notes payable								971			713
Deferred revenue		10,459			10,890			9,926			8,677
Total current liabilities		34,829			33,008			30,832			26,379
Capital leases, excluding current portion		699			852			518			612
Long-term deferred tax liabilities		64			26			6			24
Long-term notes payable								979			1,069
Other long-term liabilities		3,127			2,136			2,003			1,994
Total liabilities		38,719			36,022			34,338			30,078

Commitments and contingencies

Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued or outstanding		—			—			—			—
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 99,000,000 shares authorized, 2,773,972 shares issued and 2,681,078 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2015 and 2,773,972 shares issued and 2,676,077 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2014		—			—
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 99,000,000 shares authorized, 2,773,972 shares issued and 2,696,986 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2016 and 2,773,972 shares issued and 2,682,078 shares outstanding as of December 31, 2015								—			—
Additional paid-in capital		40,435			40,672			38,904			40,494
Retained earnings		7,060			2,750			9,180			8,589
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		323			(109	)
Treasury stock, at average cost, 92,894 shares as of September 30, 2015 and 97,895 shares as of December 31, 2014, respectively		(11,204	)		(11,937	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income								1,273			686
Treasury stock, at average cost, 76,986 shares as of March 31, 2016 and 91,894 shares as of December 31, 2015, respectively								(9,385	)		(11,205	)
Total shareholders’ equity		36,614			31,376			39,972			38,564
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	75,333		$	67,398		$	74,310		$	68,642

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS – (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except per share information)

	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2015			2014			2015			2014			2016			2015
Net sales	$	43,860		$	55,635		$	134,956		$	144,900		$	40,708		$	44,370
Cost of sales		8,253			10,304			25,076			29,440			8,389			8,553
Gross profit		35,607			45,331			109,880			115,460			32,319			35,817

Operating expenses:
Commissions and incentives		17,867			20,977			54,296			57,727			15,618			17,542
Selling and administrative		9,001			9,567			26,412			26,389
Selling and administrative expenses														8,142			8,813
Depreciation and amortization		433			441			1,324			1,248			443			396
Other operating costs		6,072			6,149			18,493			19,920			7,580			6,555
Total operating expenses		33,373			37,134			100,525			105,284			31,783			33,306

Income from operations		2,234			8,197			9,355			10,176			536			2,511
Interest income		93			25			154			61
Other expense, net		(2,418	)		(1,167	)		(3,802	)		(1,311	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		(91	)		7,055			5,707			8,926
Interest income (expense)														(13	)		30
Other income (expense), net														334			(932	)
Income before income taxes														857			1,609

(Provision) benefit for income taxes		159			(1,947	)		(1,397	)		(4,282	)
Provision for income taxes														266			510
Net income	$	68		$	5,108		$	4,310		$	4,644		$	591		$	1,099

Earnings per common share:
Basic	$	0.03		$	1.92		$	1.61		$	1.75		$	0.22		$	0.41
Diluted	$	0.03		$	1.89		$	1.58		$	1.71		$	0.21		$	0.40

Weighted-average common shares outstanding:
Basic		2,681			2,667			2,679			2,661			2,696			2,677
Diluted		2,721			2,701			2,727			2,701			2,780			2,730

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE ~~INCOME–~~INCOME – (UNAUDITED)

~~(in~~ (in thousands)

	Three months ended September 30,					Nine months ended September 30,				Three months ended March 31,
	2015		2014			2015		2014			2016		2015
Net income	$	68	$	5,108		$	4,310	$	4,644	$	591	$	1,099
Foreign currency translations		464		(173	)		432		455		587		242
Comprehensive income	$	532	$	4,935		$	4,742	$	5,099	$	1,178	$	1,341

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

– (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

	Common stock Par value		Additional paid in capital			Retained earnings		Accumulated other comprehensive income			Treasury stock			Total shareholders’ equity		Common stock Par value		Additional paid in capital			Retained earnings		Accumulated other comprehensive income		Treasury stock			Total shareholders’ equity
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	—	$	40,672		$	2,750	$	(109	)	$	(11,937	)	$	31,376
Balance at December 31, 2015																$	—	$	40,494		$	8,589	$	686	$	(11,205	)	$	38,564
Net income		—		—			4,310		—			—			4,310		—		—			591		—		—			591
Charge related to stock-based compensation		—		433			—		—			—			433		—		(1,357	)		—		—		1,575			218
Stock option exercises		—		(686	)		—		—			733			47		—		(233	)		—		—		245			12
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options		—		16			—		—			—			16
Foreign currency translations		—		—			—		432			—			432		—		—			—		587		—			587
Balance at September 30, 2015	$	—	$	40,435			7,060		323			(11,204	)		36,614
Balance at March 31, 2016																$	—	$	38,904		$	9,180	$	1,273	$	(9,385	)	$	39,972

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS – (UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)

	Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
	2015			2014			2016			2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	4,310		$	4,644		$	591		$	1,099
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,324			1,248			443			396
Provision for inventory losses		434			1,630			88			196
Provision for doubtful accounts		275			266			243			128
Loss on disposal of assets		28			42			3			7
Accounting charge related to stock-based compensation expense		450			397
Stock-based compensation expense								218			141
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options		(16	)		—			—			(16	)
Deferred income taxes		6			(2,148	)		28			(1	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(77	)		(78	)		(89	)		(26	)
Income tax receivable		(16	)		(22	)		(4	)		(6	)
Inventories		(1,730	)		(148	)		(1,951	)		(3,124	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		655			950			(673	)		962
Deferred commissions								(470	)		58
Other assets		(138	)		(187	)		(35	)		(83	)
Deferred commissions		230			(2,388	)
Accounts payable		116			(131	)		2,912			3,126
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		633			1,885			(1,591	)		(334	)
Taxes payable		(637	)		5,449			669			(527	)
Commissions and incentives payable		2,174			(271	)		689			(1,347	)
Deferred revenue		(210	)		6,488			1,119			516
Change in restricted cash		26			(3,131	)		(14	)		9
Net cash provided by operating activities		7,837			14,495			2,176			1,174
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of property and equipment		(1,583	)		(2,173	)		(709	)		(787	)
Proceeds from sale of assets		—			8
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,583	)		(2,165	)		(709	)		(787	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from stock options exercised		30			112			12			20
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options		16			—			—			16
Proceeds from note payable		1,148			—
Repayment of capital lease obligations		(1,276	)		(1,102	)
Repayment of financing arrangement obligations								(364	)		(369	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(82	)		(990	)		(352	)		(333	)
Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		1,121			450			472			346
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		7,293			11,790			1,587			400
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		27,999			20,395			31,994			27,999
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	35,292		$	32,185		$	33,581		$	28,399
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income taxes paid, net	$	4,394		$	2,180		$	5,335		$	3,245
Interest paid on capital leases	$	69		$	88		$	26		$	24
Summary of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Assets acquired through financing arrangements	$	671		$	1,821		$	409		$	1,271

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial ~~statements~~statements.

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1:

ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Mannatech, Incorporated (together with its subsidiaries, the “Company”), located in Coppell, Texas, was incorporated in the state of Texas on November 4, 1993 and is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market (“Nasdaq”) under the symbol “MTEX”. The Company develops, markets, and sells high-quality, proprietary nutritional supplements, topical and skin care products, and weight-management products. We currently sell our products in three regions: (i) ~~North America~~the Americas (the United States, Canada, Colombia and Mexico); (ii) Europe/the Middle East/Africa (“EMEA”) (Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, the Republic of Ireland, Namibia, the Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom); and ~~iii)~~(iii) Asia/Pacific (Australia, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong).

Independent associates (“associates”) purchase the Company’s products at published wholesale prices to either sell to retail customers or for personal use. Members purchase the Company’s products at a discount from published retail prices primarily for personal use. The Company cannot distinguish products sold for personal use from other sales because it is not involved with the products after delivery, other than usual and customary product warranties and returns. Only independent associates are eligible to earn commissions and incentives.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with instructions for Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, the Company’s consolidated financial statements and footnotes contained herein do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) to be considered “complete financial statements”. However, in the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and footnotes contain all adjustments, including normal recurring adjustments, considered necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial information as of, and for, the periods presented. The Company cautions that its consolidated results of operations for an interim period are not necessarily indicative of its consolidated results of operations to be expected for its fiscal year. The December 31, ~~2014~~2015 consolidated balance sheet was included in the audited consolidated financial statements in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March ~~10, 2015~~15, 2016 (the ~~“2014~~“2015 Annual Report”), which includes all disclosures required by GAAP. Therefore, these unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company included in the ~~2014~~2015 Annual Report.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements and footnotes include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles requires the use of estimates that affect the reported value of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. These estimates are based on historical experience and various other factors. The Company continually evaluates the information used to make these estimates as the business and economic environment changes. Historically, actual results have not varied materially from the Company’s estimates, and the Company does not currently anticipate a significant change in its assumptions related to these estimates. However, actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The use of estimates is pervasive throughout the consolidated financial statements, but the accounting policies and estimates considered the most significant are described in this note to the consolidated financial statements, Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting ~~Policies~~Policies.

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company includes in its cash and cash equivalents credit card receivables due from its credit card processor, as the cash proceeds from credit card receivables are received within 24 to 72 hours of submission to the credit card processor. AsFor each of ~~September 30, 2015~~the periods ended March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, credit card receivables were ~~$3.2~~$1.9 million and ~~$1.2~~$0.4 million, ~~respectively. As of September 30, 2015~~respectively, and ~~December 31, 2014,~~ cash and cash equivalents held in bank accounts in foreign countries totaled ~~$29.8~~$30.4 million and ~~$24.8~~$31.3 million, respectively. The Company invests cash in liquid instruments, such as money market funds and interest bearing deposits. The Company also holds cash in high quality financial institutions and does not believe it has an excessive exposure to credit concentration risk.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

Restricted Cash

The Company is required to restrict cash for: (i) direct selling insurance premiums and credit card sales in the Republic of Korea; (ii) reserve on credit card sales in the United States and Canada; and (iii) ~~the~~ Australia building lease collateral. As of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, our total restricted cash was ~~$8.0~~$8.3 million and ~~$8.6~~$8.1 million, respectively.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts. Receivables are created upon shipment of an order if the credit card payment is rejected or does not match the order total. As of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, receivables consisted primarily of amounts due from members and independent associates. The Company periodically evaluates its receivables for collectability based on historical experience, recent account activities, and the length of time receivables are past due and writes-off receivables when they become uncollectible. ~~For each of September 30, 2015~~At March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, the Company held an allowance for doubtful accounts of ~~$0.2 million.~~$0.4 million and $0.3 million, respectively.

Inventories

Inventories consist of raw materials, finished goods, and promotional materials that are stated at the lower of cost ~~or market~~ (using standard costs that approximate average costs). or market. The Company periodically reviews inventories for obsolescence, and any inventories identified as obsolete are reserved or written off.

Other Assets

As of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, other assets were $3.9 million and ~~$3.6~~$3.8 million, respectively, and primarily consisted of deposits for building leases in various locations of ~~$2.1~~$2.0 million and ~~$1.5~~$1.9 million, respectively. Additionally, included in the ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 balances was $1.6 million ~~and $1.7 million, respectively,~~ representing a deposit with Mutual Aid Cooperative and Consumer in the Republic of Korea, an organization established by the Republic of Korea’s Fair Trade Commission to protect consumers who participate in network marketing activities. Also included in the ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 balances was $0.2 million of indefinite lived intangible assets relating to the Manapol® powder trademark.

Notes Payable

Notes payable were $1.9 million and $1.8 million at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, as a result of funding from a capital financing agreement related to our investment in computer hardware and software and other financing arrangements. At March 31, 2016, the current portion was $1.0 million and the long-term portion was $0.9 million.

Other Long-Term Liabilities

Other long-term liabilities were ~~$3.1~~$2.0 million ~~and $2.1 million as~~at each of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014, respectively. For~~2015. At each of ~~the periods ended September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, the Company recorded $0.7 million ~~respectively,~~ in other long-term liabilities related to uncertain income tax positions (see Note 8, Income Taxes of the Company’s ~~annual report on Form~~ 10-K, ~~for the year ended December 31, 2014,~~ filed March ~~10, 2015)~~15, 2016). ~~The Company recorded~~ ~~a liability related to an equipment lease of $0.7 million for the period ended September 30, 2015.~~ Certain operating leases for the Company’s regional office facilities contain a restoration clause that requires the Company to restore the premises to its original condition. ~~Accrued~~At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, accrued restoration costs related to these leases amounted to ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million ~~at September 30, 2015~~and $0.4 million, respectively. At each of March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014. The~~2015, the Company also recorded a long-term liability for estimated defined benefit obligation related to a non-U.S. defined benefit plan for its Japan operations of ~~$0.4~~$0.5 million ~~at September 30, 2015 and $0.6 million December 31, 2014 (See~~(see Note 10, Employee Benefit Plans, of the Company’s 10-K, filed March ~~10, 2015)~~15, 2016).

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~~(continued)~~

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Commissions

The Company’s revenue is derived from sales of individual products, sales of its starter and renewal packs, and shipping fees. Substantially all of the Company’s product and pack sales are made to associates at published wholesale prices and to members at discounted published retail prices. The Company records revenue net of any sales taxes and records a reserve for expected sales returns based on its historical experience.

The Company recognizes revenue from shipped packs and products upon receipt by the customer. Corporate-sponsored event revenue is recognized when the event is held. The Company defers certain components of its revenue. At ~~September~~ ~~30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~,2015, the Company’s deferred revenue was ~~$10.5~~$9.9 million and ~~$10.9~~$8.7 million, respectively. When participating in the Company’s loyalty program, customers earn loyalty points from qualified automatic orders ~~which~~that can be applied to future purchases. The Company defers the dollar equivalent in revenue of these points until the points are applied, or forfeited or expired, which includes an estimate of the percentage of the unvested loyalty points that are expected to be forfeited or expired. ~~During the third quarter 2014, the Company modified the program to allow loyalty points to vest more quickly.~~ The deferred revenue associated with the loyalty program at ~~September~~ ~~30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~,2015 was ~~$7.9~~$8.4 million and ~~$9.7~~$8.1 million, respectively. Deferred revenue consisted primarily of: (i) sales of packs and products shipped but not received by the customers by the end of the respective period; (ii) revenue from the loyalty program; and (iii) prepaid registration fees from customers planning to attend a future corporate-sponsored event. In total current assets, the Company defers commissions on (i) the sales of packs and products shipped but not received by the customers by the end of the respective period and (ii) the loyalty program. Deferred commissions were ~~$4.2~~$4.0 million and ~~$4.5~~$3.4 million at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~,2015, respectively.

Loyalty program	(in thousands)			(in thousands)
Loyalty deferred revenue as of January 1, 2014	$	5,456
Loyalty deferred revenue as of January 1, 2015				$	9,703
Loyalty points forfeited or expired		(4,664	)		(8,801	)
Loyalty points used		(12,348	)		(15,077	)
Loyalty points vested		19,580			20,403
Loyalty points unvested		1,679			1,845
Loyalty deferred revenue as of December 31, 2014	$	9,703
Loyalty deferred revenue as of December 31, 2015				$	8,073

Loyalty deferred revenue as of January 1, 2015	$	9,703
Loyalty deferred revenue as of January 1, 2016				$	8,073
Loyalty points forfeited or expired		(7,143	)		(1,535	)
Loyalty points used		(11,068	)		(4,063	)
Loyalty points vested		14,826			3,672
Loyalty points unvested		1,588			2,276
Loyalty deferred revenue as of September 30, 2015	$	7,906
Loyalty deferred revenue as of March 31, 2016				$	8,423

The Company estimates a sales return reserve for expected sales refunds based on historical experience over a rolling six month period. If actual results differ from our estimated sales return reserve due to various factors, the amount of revenue recorded for each period could be materially affected. Historically, sales returns have not materially changed through the years, as the majority of our customers who return their merchandise do so within the first 90 days after the original sale. Sales returns have historically averaged 1.5% or less of our gross sales. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015 our~~March 31, 2016, sales return reserve consisted of the following (in thousands):

Sales reserve as of January 1, 2015	$	207
Sales reserve as of January 1, 2016				$	147
Provision related to sales made in current period		1,053			213
Adjustment related to sales made in prior periods		51			(32	)
Actual returns or credits related to current period		(898	)		(79	)
Actual returns or credits related to prior periods		(249	)		(104	)
Sales reserve as of September 30, 2015	$	164
Sales reserve as of March 31, 2016				$	145

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~~(continued)~~

Shipping and Handling ~~Costs~~

The Company records freight and shipping fees collected from its customers as revenue. The Company records inbound freight as a component of inventory and ~~both inbound and outbound freight as a component of~~ cost of sales.

Commissions and Incentives

Associates earn commissions and incentives based on their direct and indirect commissionable net sales over 13 business periods each year. Each business period equals 28 days. The Company accrues commissions and incentives when earned by associates and pays commissions on product sales three weeks following the business period end and pays commissions on its pack sales five weeks following the business period end.

Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~ and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss~~)

Comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~ is defined as the change in equity of a business enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources and includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. The Company’s comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~ consists of the Company’s net income, foreign currency translation adjustments from its Japan, Republic of Korea, Taiwan, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Colombia and Mexico operations, and changes in the pension obligation for its Japanese employees.

NOTE 2:

INVENTORIES

Inventories consist of raw materials, ~~and~~ finished goods, ~~which also includes~~and promotional materials. The Company provides an allowance for any slow-moving or obsolete inventories. Inventories at ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, consisted of the following (in thousands):

	September 30, 2015			December 31, 2014			March 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Raw materials	$	1,460		$	2,118		$	969		$	1,187
Finished goods		11,555			10,615			11,330			9,277
Inventory reserves for obsolescence		(1,617	)		(2,142	)		(1,071	)		(1,265	)
Total	$	11,398		$	10,591		$	11,228		$	9,199

NOTE 3:

INCOME TAXES

For the three months ended September 30, 2015, taxes were a $0.2 million benefit on a $0.1 million pre-tax loss due to a return to provision adjustment, resulting in an effective tax rate of 175.5%. For the nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s effective tax rate was ~~24.5%. For the three~~31.0% and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company’s effective income tax rate was 27.6%~~31.7%, respectively, and ~~48.0%, respectively. For these periods, the Company’s effective tax rate~~ was determined based on the estimated annual effective income tax rate.

The effective tax ~~rate~~rates for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was higher than what would have been expected if the federal statutory rate were applied to income before taxes. Items increasing the effective tax rate include a return to provision adjustment offset by favorable rate differences from foreign jurisdictions and the utilization of foreign income tax credit. The effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2014March 31, 2016 was lower than what would have been expected if the U.S. federal statutory rate were applied to income before taxes. Items decreasing the effective income tax ~~rate included~~ rates are primarily favorable rate differences ~~from~~in foreign jurisdictions, valuation allowance and foreign income tax credit attributable to profit positions in certain foreign jurisdictions. The effective tax rates for the three months ended March 31, 2015 was slightly lower than what would have been expected if the U.S. federal statutory rate were applied to income before taxes. The decrease in the effective income tax rates was primarily due to favorable rate differences in foreign jurisdictions and release of valuation allowance due to profit in certain foreign jurisdictions, partially offset by permanent differences between the ~~overall profitability improvement during this period~~.

tax code and U.S. GAAP.

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~~(continued)~~

The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was lower than what would have been expected if the federal statutory rate were applied to income before taxes. Items decreasing the effective income tax rate include the favorable rate differences from foreign jurisdictions due to the overall ~~profitability~~ and the utilization of foreign income tax credit. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was higher than what would have been expected if the federal statutory rate were applied to income before taxes. Items increasing the effective income tax rate included the change in the valuation allowances associated with certain deferred tax assets and subpart F income resulting from controlled foreign corporation operations.

NOTE 4:

EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company calculates basic Earnings Per Share (“EPS”) by dividing net income by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS also reflects the potential dilution that could occur if common stock were issued for awards outstanding under the 2008 Stock Incentive Plan. ~~In determining the potential dilution effect of outstanding stock options during~~The Company reported net income for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and 2014, the Company used the quarter’s average common stock close price of $18.13 and $13.29 per share, respectively. In determining the potential dilution effect of outstanding stock options during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company used the nine month average common stock close price of $19.83 and $15.03 per share, respectively. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, approximately 0.1 million shares of the Company’s common stock subject to options were excluded from the diluted EPS calculation, as the effect would have been antidilutive. The Company reported net income for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and during that period a negligible amount of common stock subject to options was dilutive. In determining the potential dilution effect of outstanding stock options during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company used the quarter’s average common stock close price of $18.50 and $21.36 per share, respectively.

NOTE 5:

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company currently has one active stock-based compensation plan, which was approved by shareholders. The Company grants stock options to employees, consultants, and board members at the fair market value of its common stock, on the date of grant, with a term no greater than ten years. The majority of stock options vest over two or three years. Shareholders who own 10% or more of the Company’s outstanding stock are granted incentive stock options at an exercise price that may not be less than 110% of the fair market value of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant and have a term no greater than five years.

In February 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors approved the Mannatech, Incorporated 2008 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2008 Plan”), which ~~reserves~~reserved up to 100,000 (as adjusted for a 1-for-10 reverse stock split) shares of common stock for issuance of stock options and restricted stock to our employees, board members, and consultants, plus any shares reserved under the Company’s then-existing, unexpired stock plans for which options had not yet been issued, and any shares underlying outstanding options under the then-existing stock option plans that terminate without having been exercised in full. The 2008 Plan was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the 2008 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting and was amended at the 2012 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting ~~held May 30, 2012~~ to increase the number of shares of common stock subject to the plan by ~~100,000. At~~100,000 and amended again at the 2014 Annual Shareholders’ Meeting ~~the 2008 Plan was amended again~~ to increase the number of shares of common stock subject to the plan by an additional 130,000. As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, the 2008 Plan had ~~164,474~~94,282 stock options available for grant before the plan expires on February 20, 2018.

The Company records stock-based compensation expense related to granting stock options in selling and administrative expenses. ~~During~~The Company did not grant any options during each of the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and 2014, the Company granted 12,000 and zero stock options, respectively. The fair value of stock options granted during the three months ended September 30, 2015 was $10.36 per share. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company granted 32,000 and 81,000 stock options, respectively. The fair value of stock options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 ranged from $10.36 to $12.80 per share.March 31, 2015. The Company recognized compensation expense as follows for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30~~March 31 (in thousands):

Three months
ended September 30

Nine months
ended September 30

2015 2014 2015 2014
Total gross compensation expense $ 149 $ 95 $ 450 $ 397
Total tax benefit associated with compensation expense 38 20 111 101
Total net compensation expense $ 111 $ 75 $ 339 $ 296

~~Table of Contents~~

~~MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

	Three months ending March 31,
	2016		2015
Total gross compensation expense	$	218	$	141
Total tax benefit associated with compensation expense		19		31
Total net compensation expense	$	199	$	110

As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, the Company expects to record compensation expense in the future as follows (in thousands):

	Three months		Year ending December 31,								Nine months	Year ending December 31,
	ending December 31, 2015		2016		2017			2018			ending December 31, 2016			2017		2018		2019
Total gross unrecognized compensation expense	$	143	$	341		$	167	$	105	$	297		$	255	$	71	$	29
Tax benefit associated with unrecognized compensation expense		32		47			11		—		32			17		—		—
Total net unrecognized compensation expense	$	111	$	294		$	156	$	105	$	265		$	238	$	71	$	29

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 6:

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~

Accumulated other comprehensive income, displayed in the Consolidated ~~Statement~~Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Comprehensive Income, represents net income plus the results of certain shareholders’ equity changes not reflected in the ~~Consolidated Statements~~consolidated statements of ~~Operations,~~operations, such as foreign currency translation and certain pension and post-retirement benefit obligations. The after-tax components of accumulated other comprehensive ~~loss,~~income, are as follows (in thousands):

Foreign
Currency
Translation

Pension
Postretirement
Benefit
Obligation

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive Income, Net

Balance as of December 31, 2014 $ (457 ) $ 348 $ (109 )
Current-period change ¹

432

—

432

Balance as of September 30, 2015 $ (25 ) $ 348 $ 323

	Foreign Currency Translation		Pension Postretirement Benefit Obligation		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net
Balance as of December 31, 2015	$	358	$	328	$	686
Current-period change ¹		587		—		587
Balance as of March 31, 2016	$	945	$	328	$	1,273

No amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

NOTE 7:

LITIGATION

Patent Litigation

Mannatech, Incorporated v. Wellness Quest, LLC and Harley Reginald McDaniel, Case No. 3:14-cv-2497, U.S. District Court, for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division

On July 11, 2014 the Company filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Wellness Quest, LLC and Dr. H. Reginald McDaniel (“Defendants”) alleging the Defendants infringe United States Patent Nos. 7,157,431 and 7,202,220, both entitled “Compositions of Plant Carbohydrates as Dietary Supplements” (the “Patents”) and seeking to stop the Defendants’ manufacture, offer, and sale of infringing glyconutritional dietary supplement products. On July 16, 2014, the Company filed a Motion for Preliminary Injunction preventing Defendants from infringing the Patents pending a final decision on the merits. On August 29, 2014, the Defendants filed their Response to Plaintiff’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Brief in Support along with their Answer and Affirmative Defenses. On November 4, 2014, the Court denied the Company’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction and Motion to Expedite Discovery. On December 15, 2014, the Company deposed Dr. Reginald McDaniel. Each party has submitted its list of claim constructions/definitions and a list of the supporting authority. Each party has filed its opening brief and its respective responsive brief. Defendants ~~have~~ designated an expert and the Company deposed the expert on January 27, 2015 regarding his claim construction opinions while reserving the right to examine him later regarding other matters. Mediation on this matter was held on April 24, 2015. A settlement was not reached.

On May 12, 2015 the Company received notice of an Order of Transfer advising that the case had been reassigned from Judge Ed Kinkeade to Judge David C. Godbey for all further proceedings. On July 20, 2015, the Court issued its Markman ruling adopting the Company’s proposed claim construction for all disputed terms except for “dietary supplement composition” which it found needed no construction. On August 20, 2015, Defendants filed a request for an interlocutory appeal, and the Company filed a reply on October 6, 2015. The Company also filed a separate motion requesting entry of a final judgment and permanent injunction on September 8, 2015.

On November 5, 2015 the Court issued an Order accepting ~~Defendant’s~~Defendants’ stipulation of infringement under the Court’s claim interpretation ~~granting~~and granted the Company’s partial motion for summary judgment and ~~issuing~~issued a permanent injunction against Defendants’ infringement of the Patents. The Court stayed the permanent injunction until the conclusion of Defendants’ appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal ~~Circuit.~~Circuit (the “Court of Appeals”). On December 3, 2015, Defendants filed their Notice of Appeal which was docketed by the Court of Appeals on December 8, 2015. Defendants-Appellants filed their brief with the Court of Appeals on February 28, 2016. The Company-Appellee filed its brief with the Court of Appeals on March 24, 2016. This matter remains open.

~~Mannatech, Incorporated v. RBC Life Sciences, Inc. and RBC Life Sciences USA, Inc,.~~ 11~~Case No. 3:15-cv-01321-N, U.S. District Court, for the Northern District~~

Table of ~~Texas, Dallas Division~~Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~On April 28, 2015 the Company filed a patent infringement~~This lawsuit against RBC Life Sciences, Inc. and RBC Life Sciences USA, Inc. (“Defendants”) alleging the Defendants infringe United States Patent Nos. 7,157,431 and 7,202,220, both entitled “Compositions of Plant Carbohydrates as Dietary Supplements” (the “Patents”) and seeking to stop their manufacture, offer, and sale of infringing glyconutritional dietary supplement products. The Defendants filed their answer and have asserted counterclaims alleging, among other things, invalidity and non-infringement. On May 12, 2015 the Company received notice of an Order of Transfer advising that the case had been reassigned from Judge Ed Kinkeade to Judge David C. Godbey for all further proceedings. The parties filed the Case Management Report with the Court on June 24, 2015. The Company filed its answer to Defendants’ counterclaims on June 29, 2015.

The parties reached a settlement on July 28, 2015, and the Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction was entered on August 5, 2015. The Defendants are enjoined from making the infringing products in the United States; importing the infringing products into the United States; and marketing products marked with the trademarks VITALOE^® ~~and IMMUNE 360~~^® as “glyconutrients.” As of October 31, 2015, Defendants have been enjoined from selling the infringing products as currently formulated in the United States for the terms of the Patents. Subject to Defendants performance of the above obligations, the Company will release Defendants of all infringement claims asserted in the lawsuit and the Defendants, subject to the Company’s performance of its obligations under the Agreement will release the Company from all claims asserted in its counterclaims and further agree to not challenge, or cause to be challenged, the validity or enforceability of the Patents. This matter is closed.

~~These lawsuits continue~~continues the Company’s enforcement of its patent rights, and the Company intends to vigorously prosecute ~~these matters.~~this matter. Based on the previous successful patent infringement lawsuits against Country Life, LLC, Glycobiotics International, Inc., Techmedica Health, Inc., IonX Holdings, Inc., Boston Mountain Laboratories, Inc., Green Life, LLC, and Xiong Lo, the Company believes there is a strong likelihood that it will obtain permanent injunctions against the manufacture and sale of any infringing products for the duration of the Company’s patents.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

Breach of Contract

Diana Anselmo and New Day Today Corporation v. Mannatech, Incorporated, Case No. DC-15-01904, ~~192nd~~ Judicial District Court, Dallas County, Texas

On February 18, 2015 Ms. Diana Anselmo and New Day Today Corporation (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) filed suit against Mannatech alleging breach of contract pertaining to a portion of proceeds from a Mannatech Associate position once held by Ms. Anselmo’s former husband, Ray Gebauer. Plaintiffs are seeking damages in excess of $1,000,000 and a declaration that the Company continue to pay Plaintiffs proceeds from Mr. Gebauer’s former account.

The Company filed its answer on March 23, 2015 denying the Plaintiffs’ allegations. The Court set the case for trial on March 7, 2016; however, on December 7, 2015 the Court granted the parties Agreed Motion for Continuation and reset the trial for July 11, 2016. The Court ~~has appointed~~issued a ~~mediator and has ordered that~~ mediation order on April 20, 2015. Mediation must be conducted no later than ~~February 7,~~June 17, 2016. The parties have scheduled depositions and remain engaged in the discovery process. It is not possible at this time to predict whether the Company will incur any liability, or to estimate the ranges of damages, if any, which may be incurred in connection with this matter. However, the Company believes it has a valid defense and will vigorously defend this claim. This matter remains open.

Trademark Opposition – U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”)

United States Trademark Opposition No. 91221493, Shaklee Corporation v. Mannatech, Incorporated re: UTH

On April 15, 2015 the Company received notice that Shaklee Corporationfiled a Notice of Opposition to the Company’s trademark application for UTH (stylized as Ū^th) with the USPTO. On May 19, 2015, the Company filed an answer to the opposition and also filed a counterclaim seeking to cancel Shaklee’s registration of its YOUTH mark. Shaklee filed an extension to oppose the UTH mark on June 18, 2015, and the request to extend time to oppose was granted until July 18, 2015. Shaklee filed a second extension on July 17, 2015, and the request to extend time to oppose ~~was~~has been granted until September 16, 2015. Shaklee filed motions to strike the Company’s Affirmative Defenses to the Opposition and Counterclaim to cancel their registrations. The Company filed responses and the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“TTAB”) ruled in Shaklee’s favor. The Company filed an amended Answer to the Opposition and Amended Counterclaim on November 18, 2015. Shaklee then filed an answer to the Company’s Counterclaim on December 30, 2015.

On September 15, 2015 ~~Shaklee~~Shaklee filed two more Notices of ~~Opposition.~~Opposition for the UTH & Design and ŪTH applications. The Company ~~will seek consolidation of all three oppositions~~filed Answers and ~~file any necessary counterclaims by~~Counterclaims on November ~~24,~~20, 2015. On January 25, 2016, the Company filed a motion to strike Shaklee’s affirmative defense on cancellation. The TTAB suspended the case on January 27, 2016 for further review. This matter remains open.

It is not possible at this time to predict the outcome of ~~this~~the USPTO action or whether the Company will incur any liability, or to estimate the ranges of damages, if any, which may be incurred in connection with this matter. However, the Company believes it has a valid defense and will vigorously defend this claim.

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Arbitration Proceeding

Mannatech v. Samuel L. Caster and Wonder Enterprises, LLC, Demand for Arbitration, Case No. 01-15-0003-6812.

On May 29, 2015 the Company initiated arbitration proceedings against Samuel L. Caster and Wonder Enterprises, LLC (“Respondents”) alleging breach of contract by Mr. Caster and his company, Wonder Enterprises, under a series of consulting agreements entered into by the parties. Mannatech seeks to recover actual damages, costs of court and prejudgment interest together with disgorgement of all benefits received by the Respondents. The Company estimates its damages to be between $500,000.00 and $3,500,000.00. On June 12, 2015 Respondents contacted the Company’s counsel to request mediation. The parties agreed to mediate this dispute, and mediation was held on August 17, 2015. However, a settlement was not reached. A preliminary hearing for arbitration was held on September 18, 2015, and a final hearing commenced on April 25, 2016. A hearing was held on March 2, 2016 where the arbitrator granted Respondents’ request to file a motion for summary judgment and granted the Company until March 21, 2016 to issue its response. The arbitrator also granted the Company’s motion to compel the Respondents to produce the customer list for Mr. Caster’s former company, EM Squared. The Company filed its response to Respondents’ Motion for Summary Judgment on March 21, 2016. The arbitration hearing is scheduled to begin on August 29, 2016. The parties remain engaged in the discovery process. This matter remains open.

Administrative Proceedings

On April 12, 2015 Mannatech Korea, Ltd. filed a suit against the Busan Custom Office (“BCO”) to challenge BCO’s method of calculation regarding its assessment notice issued on July 11, 2013. The assessment notice included an audit of the Company’s imported goods covering fiscal years 2008 through 2012 and required the Company to pay $1.0 million for this assessment, which was paid in January 2014. ~~No court date has been set.~~Both parties submitted a response to the Court’s inquiry on January 15, 2016. The Court set the hearing for March 24, 2016, which was delayed to April 28, 2016 due to scheduling conflicts. At the hearing held on April 28, 2016, the presiding judge expressed concerns that the underpaid customs duty was assessed while the overpaid customs duty was not refunded. The judge set the next hearing for May 26, 2016 to set a decision. This matter remains open.

There are other ongoing audits in various international jurisdictions that the Company does not expect will have a material effect on our financial statements.

~~Arbitration Proceeding~~

~~Mannatech v. Samuel L. Caster and Wonder Enterprises, LLC, Demand for Arbitration~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

Litigation in General

The Company is or may become subject to claims in the normal course of business. The Company believes such claims can be resolved without any material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

The Company maintains certain liability insurance; however, certain costs of defending lawsuits are not covered or are only partially covered by its insurance policies, including claims that are below insurance deductibles. Additionally, insurance carriers could refuse to cover certain claims, in whole or in part. The Company accrues costs to defend itself from litigation as they are incurred or as they become determinable.

The outcome of litigation is uncertain, and despite management’s views of the merits of any litigation, or the reasonableness of the Company’s estimates and reserves, the Company’s financial statements could nonetheless be materially affected by an adverse judgment. The Company believes it has adequately reserved for the contingencies arising from current legal matters where an outcome was deemed to be probable, and the loss amount could be reasonably estimated.

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 8:

FAIR VALUE

The Company utilizes fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments to certain financial assets and to determine fair value disclosures.

Fair Value Measurements and DisclosureTopic 820 of the Financial Accounting Standards Board ~~(“FASB”)~~ Accounting Standards Codification (“FASB ASC”) establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires the use of observable market data, when available, and prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value in the following categories:

~~Level 1 – Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets.~~

·Level 1 – Quoted unadjusted prices for identical instruments in active markets.

Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations in which all observable inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

·Level 2 – Quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active and model-derived valuations in which all observable inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets.

~~Level 3 – Model-derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable, including assumptions developed by the Company.~~

·Level 3 – Model-derived valuations in which one or more significant inputs or significant value drivers are unobservable, including assumptions developed by the Company.

The primary objective of the Company’s investment activities is to preserve principal while maximizing yields without significantly increasing risk. The investment instruments held by the Company are money market funds and interest bearing deposits for which quoted market prices are readily available. The Company considers these highly liquid investments to be cash equivalents. These investments are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets. The Company does not have any material financial liabilities that were required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis at ~~September 30, 2015.~~

March 31, 2016. The table below presents the recorded amount of financial assets measured at fair value (in thousands) on a recurring basis as of ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014.~~2015.

September 30, 2015	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
March 31, 2016									Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Money Market Funds – Fidelity, US	$	1,318	$	—	$	—	$	1,318	$	1,161	$	—	$	—	$	1,161
Interest bearing deposits – various banks		11,894		—		—		11,894		19,969		—		—		19,969
Total assets	$	13,212	$	—	$	—	$	13,212	$	21,130	$	—	$	—	$	21,130
Amounts included in:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	7,144	$	—	$	—	$	7,144	$	14,825	$	—	$	—	$	14,825
Restricted cash		6,068		—		—		6,068		739		—		—		739
Long-term restricted cash										5,566		—		—		5,566
Total	$	13,212	$	—	$	—	$	13,212	$	21,130	$	—	$	—	$	21,130

December 31, 2015	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Money Market Funds – Fidelity, US	$	319	$	—	$	—	$	319
Interest bearing deposits – various banks		14,134		—		—		14,134
Total	$	14,453	$	—	$	—	$	14,453
Amounts included in:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	8,281	$	—	$	—	$	8,281
Restricted cash		737		—		—		737
Long-term restricted cash		5,435		—		—		5,435
Total	$	14,453	$	—	$	—	$	14,453

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~~(continued)~~

December 31, 2014
Level 1

Level 2

Level 3

Total

Assets
Money Market Funds – Fidelity, US $ 392 $ — $ — $ 392
Interest bearing deposits – various banks 12,322 — — 12,322
Total assets $ 12,714 $ — $ — $ 12,714
Amounts included in:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 6,159 $ — $ — $ 6,159
Restricted cash 738 — — 738
Long-term restricted cash 5,817 — — 5,817
Total $ 12,714 $ — $ — $ 12,714

NOTE 9:

SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company conducts its business as a single operating segment, consolidating all of its business units into a single reportable entity, as a seller of proprietary nutritional supplements, topical and skin care and anti-aging products, and weight-management and fitness products through its network marketing distribution ~~channels.~~channels operating in twenty-five countries. Each of the Company’s business units sells similar packs and products and possesses similar economic characteristics, such as selling prices and gross margins. In each country, the Company markets its products and pays commissions and incentives in similar market environments. The Company’s management reviews its financial information by country and focuses its internal reporting and analysis of revenues by packs and product sales. The Company sells its products through its independent associates who occupy positions in our network and distribute products through similar distribution channels in each country. No single independent associate has ever accounted for more than 10% of the Company’s consolidated net sales.

The Company operates facilities in ~~twelve~~thirteen countries and sells product in ~~twenty-four~~twenty-five countries around the world. These facilities are located in the United States, Canada, Switzerland, Australia, the United Kingdom, Japan, the Republic of Korea (South Korea), Taiwan, South Africa, ~~Mexico,~~Hong Kong, Singapore, Colombia and ~~Hong Kong.~~Mexico. Each facility services different geographic areas. We currently sell our products in three regions: (i) ~~North America~~the Americas (the United States, Canada, Colombia and Mexico); (ii) EMEA (Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, the Republic of Ireland, Namibia, the Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom); ~~and~~ (iii) Asia/Pacific (Australia, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong).

Consolidated net sales shipped to customers in these regions, along with pack and product ~~sales~~ information for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, are~~March 31, were as follows (in millions, except percentages):

	Three months								Nine months								Three months ended March 31
Region	2015				2014				2015				2014				2016				2015
North America	$	17.8	40.6	%	$	20.4	36.6	%	$	54.7	40.5	%	$	61.6	42.5	%
Americas																	$	16.0	39.3	%	$	18.1	40.8	%
Asia/Pacific		22.0	50.1	%		30.3	54.6	%		68.3	50.6	%		70.9	48.9	%		21.4	52.6	%		22.7	51.1	%
EMEA		4.1	9.3	%		4.9	8.8	%		12.0	8.9	%		12.4	8.6	%		3.3	8.1	%		3.6	8.1	%
Totals	$	43.9	100.0	%	$	55.6	100.0	%	$	135.0	100.0	%	$	144.9	100.0	%
Total																	$	40.7	100.0	%	$	44.4	100.0	%

	Three months				Nine months				Three months ended March 31
	2015		2014		2015		2014		2016		2015
Consolidated product sales	$	35.3	$	45.9	$	105.8	$	117.7	$	33.7	$	34.2
Consolidated pack sales		7.1		7.8		24.9		21.7		5.8		8.9
Consolidated other, including freight		1.5		1.9		4.3		5.5		1.2		1.3
Consolidated total net sales	$	43.9	$	55.6	$	135.0	$	144.9
Total									$	40.7	$	44.4

Long-lived assets, which include property and equipment and construction in progress for the Company and its subsidiaries, as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, reside in the following regions, as follows (in millions):

Region	March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
Americas	$	3.9	$	3.5
Asia/Pacific		1.0		1.1
EMEA		0.1		0.1
Total	$	5.0	$	4.7

Table of Contents

MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~~(continued)~~

~~Long-lived assets, which include property, equipment and construction in progress for the Company and its subsidiaries, reside in the following regions in the following amounts~~ ~~(in millions)~~:

Region
September 30, 2015 December 31, 2014
North America $ 3.7 $ 3.1
Asia/Pacific 1.0 0.8
EMEA 0.1 0.2
Total $ 4.8 $ 4.1

Inventory balances, ~~by region,~~ which consist of raw materials, work in progress, finished goods, and promotional materials, as offset by the allowance for slow moving or obsolete inventories, ~~were as follows~~reside in the following regions (in millions):

Region	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
North America	$	4.3	$	4.0
Americas					$	4.5	$	3.4
Asia/Pacific		4.9		4.3		4.1		4.3
EMEA		2.2		2.3		2.6		1.5
Total	$	11.4	$	10.6	$	11.2	$	9.2

NOTE 10:

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In ~~May 2014,~~March 2016, the FASB issued ~~Accounting Standards Update (ASU)~~ASU No. ~~2014-09,~~2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), which ~~supersedes~~clarifies the ~~revenue recognition~~principal versus agent implementation guidance, but does not change the core principle of the new standard. The updates:

Require an entity to determine whether it is a principal or an agent for each distinct good or service to be provided to the customer;

Illustrate how an entity that is a principal might apply the control principle to goods, services, or rights to services, when another party is involved in providing goods or services to a customer;

Clarify that the purpose of certain specific control indicators is to support or assist in the assessment of whether an entity controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to the customer, provide more specific guidance on how the indicators should be considered, and clarify that their relevance will vary depending on the facts and circumstances;

Revise existing examples and add two new ones to more clearly depict how the guidance should be applied.

The effective date and transition requirements inare the same as the effective date and transition requirements of Topic ~~605,~~606, Revenue ~~Recognition.~~from Contract with Customers (see ASU 2015-14 above).

In ~~August, 2015~~March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2015-14,~~2016-09, ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers~~Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic ~~606)~~718): ~~Deferral~~Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which is intended to simplify the accounting for stock based compensation. The areas for simplification in ASU 2016-09 involve several aspects of the ~~Effective Date~~ ~~which amended ASU No. 2014-09,~~ ~~Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)~~ ~~to defer~~accounting for share-based payment transaction, including the ~~effective date~~income tax consequences, classification of ~~ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities by one year.~~awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects in exchange for those goods. To achieve that core principle, an entity should apply the following steps:

~~-Step 1: Identify the contract(s) with a customer.~~

~~-Step 2: Identify the performance obligations in the contract.~~

~~-Step 3: Determine the transaction price.~~

~~-Step 4: Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract.~~

~~-Step 5: Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.~~

~~The standard~~update is effective for ~~the Company for~~ annual ~~reporting~~ periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within that reporting period, using either of the following transition methods: (i) a full retrospective approach reflecting the application of the standard in each prior reporting period with the option to elect certain practical expedients, or (ii) a retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially adopting ASU 2014-09 recognized at the date of adoption (which includes additional footnote disclosures.) Early application is permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Management is currently evaluating the impact of the Company’s pending adoption of ASU 2014-09 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and has not yet determined the method by which the Company will adopt the standard in 2018.

~~In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01,~~ ~~Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items, which eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. The update is effective for fiscal years,~~2016, and interim periods within those ~~fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Because this standard only impacts presentation and disclosure requirements, its~~annual periods. Early adoption is ~~not expected to have a material impact on~~permitted, provided that, if an entity early adopts the ~~Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~MANNATECH, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES~~

~~NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)~~

~~In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-05,~~ ~~Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software~~ ~~(Subtopic 350-40), which adds guidance to Subtopic 350-40,~~ ~~Intangibles – Goodwill and Other – Internal-Use Software. The~~ amendments in ~~this update provide guidance~~an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period, and all amendments are adopted in the same period. Certain detailed transition provisions apply if an entity elects to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. The update is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015 and early ~~adoption is permitted.~~adopt. Management is currently ~~evaluating the impact of this standard on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.~~

~~In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-11,~~ ~~Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory~~, which provides guidance to more closely align the measurement of inventory in GAAP with the measurement of inventory in International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). For Mannatech, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Management is currently evaluatingevaluation the impact of this standard on the Company’s consolidated results of operations and financial condition.

Other recently issued accounting pronouncements did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

1716

Table of Contents

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion is intended to assist in the understanding of our consolidated financial position and results of operations for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 as compared to the same period in ~~2014,~~2015, and should be read in conjunction with Item I “Financial Statements” in Part I of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. Unless stated otherwise, all financial information presented below, throughout this report, and in the consolidated financial statements and related notes includes Mannatech and all of our subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. To supplement our financial results presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP"), we disclose certain adjusted financial measures which we refer to as Constant dollar (“Constant dollar”) measures, which are non-GAAP financial measures. Refer to the Non-GAAP Financial Measures section herein for a description of how such Constant dollar ~~(“Constant dollar”) growth rate (a Non-GAAP financial metric) is~~measures are determined.

COMPANY OVERVIEW

Since November 1993, we have continued to develop innovative, ~~high-quality,~~high quality, proprietary nutritional supplements, topical, ~~and~~ skin care and anti-aging products, and weight-management products that are sold through a global network marketing system. We operate in three regions: (i) ~~North America~~the Americas (the United States, Canada, Colombia and Mexico); (ii) EMEA (Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, the Republic of Ireland, Namibia, the Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom); and (iii) Asia/Pacific (Australia, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong). ~~Our Switzerland office manages certain day-to-day business needs of non-North American markets.~~ By the end of ~~2015,~~the third quarter of 2016, we ~~plan to operate~~anticipate commencing a non-direct selling business segment in ~~Colombia.~~China.

We currently conduct our business as a single operating segment and ~~in the past 12 months, sales~~primarily sell our products through a network of ~~packs and products have been made through our network that has~~ approximately ~~221,000~~218,000 active independent associate and member ~~positions.~~positions held by individuals that purchased our products and/or packs during the last 12 months, who we refer to as current independent associates and members. New pack sales and positions in our network are leading indicators for the long-term success of our business. New associate or member positions are created in our network when our packs and products are purchased for the first ~~time under a new account.~~time. We operate as a seller of nutritional supplements, topical skin care and anti-aging products, and weight-management products through our network marketing distribution channels operating in ~~twenty-four~~twenty-five countries. We review and analyze net sales by geographical location and by packs and products on a consolidated basis. Each of our subsidiaries sells similar products and exhibits similar economic characteristics, such as selling prices and gross margins.

Because we sell our products through network marketing distribution channels, the opportunities and challenges that affect us most are: recruitment of new and retention of active independent associates and members ~~that~~who occupy sales or purchasing positions in our network; entry into new markets and growth of existing markets; niche market development; new product introduction; and investment in our infrastructure.

Current Economic Conditions and Recent Developments

Overall net sales decreased ~~$11.7~~$3.7 million, or ~~21.2%~~8.3%, during the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, as compared to the same period in ~~2014, and overall~~2015. For the three month period ended March 31, 2016, our net sales ~~decreased $9.9~~declined 3.6% on a Constant dollar basis (see Non-GAAP Financial Measures, below); unfavorable foreign exchange caused a $2.1 million ~~or 6.9% during the nine months ended September 30, 2015,~~decline in GAAP net sales as compared to the same period in ~~2014. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, our~~2015. Our operations outside of ~~North America~~the Americas accounted for approximately ~~59.4% and 59.5%, respectively,~~60.7% of our consolidated net sales.

~~The net sales comparisons for the three-~~Independent associate and ~~nine-month periods were affected~~member positions held by ~~the launch of the U~~^th ~~skin care product~~individuals in our ~~international markets in 2014, the translation of foreign currency into U.S. dollars and the loyalty program. Net sales attributable~~network decreased by 5.2% to ~~our U~~^th ~~skin care product were $1.0 million and $5.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, as compared to $7.2 million and $11.5 million in the same periods in 2014.~~

~~The loyalty program increased third quarter 2015 net sales by $0.6 million and increased net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 by $6.1 million, as~~218,000 at March 31, 2016, compared to the same ~~periods~~period in ~~2014. Excluding~~ the effects on net sales of the loyalty program, net sales would have decreased by $12.3 million, or 22.2% for the three months ended September 30, 2015, and by $16.0 million, or 11.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same periods in 2014.

Measured in Constant dollars, sales would have been $48.2 million and $144.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively. These adjusted net sales expressed in Constant dollars exclude the impact of changes due to the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars and are a non-GAAP financial measure discussed in further detail below.prior year.

1817

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2015

The table below summarizes our consolidated operating results in dollars and as a percentage of net sales for the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~ ~~(in~~(in thousands, except percentages):

2015 2014
Change from
2015 to 2014

Total
dollars

% of
net sales

Total
dollars

% of
net sales
Dollar Percentage
Net sales $ 43,860 100.0 % $ 55,635 100.0 % $ (11,775 ) (21.2 )%
Cost of sales 8,253 18.8 % 10,304 18.5 % (2,051 ) (19.9 )%
Gross profit 35,607 81.2 % 45,331 81.5 % (9,724 ) (21.5 )%

Operating expenses:
Commissions and incentives 17,867 40.7 % 20,977 37.7 % (3,110 ) (14.8 )%
Selling and administrative expenses 9,001 20.5 % 9,567 17.2 % (566 ) (5.9 )%
Depreciation and amortization 433 1.0 % 441 0.8 % (8 ) (1.8 )%
Other operating costs 6,072 13.9 % 6,149 11.1 % (77 ) (1.3 )%
Total operating expenses 33,373 76.1 % 37,134 66.7 % (3,761 ) (10.1 )%
Income from operations 2,234 5.1 % 8,197 14.7 % (5,963 ) (72.7 )%
Interest income 93 0.2 % 25 0.0 % 68 272.0 %
Other expense, net (2,418 ) (5.5 )% (1,167 ) (2.1 )% (1,251 ) 107.2 %
Income (loss) before income taxes (91 ) (0.2
)%
7,055 12.7 % (7,146 ) (101.3 )%
(Provision) benefit for income taxes
159 0.4 % (1,947 ) (3.5 )% 2,106 108.2 %
Net income $ 68 0.2 % $ 5,108 9.2 % $ (5,040 ) (98.7 )%

~~The table below summarizes our consolidated operating results in dollars and as a percentage of net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014~~ ~~(in thousands, except percentages):~~

	2015						2014						Change from 2015 to 2014						2016						2015						Change
	Total dollars			% of net sales			Total dollars			% of net sales			Dollar			Percentage			Total Dollars			% of net sales			Total dollars			% of net sales			Dollar			Percentage
Net sales	$	134,956			100.0	%	$	144,900			100.0	%	$	(9,944	)		(6.9	)%	$	40,708			100.0	%	$	44,370			100.0	%	$	(3,662	)		(8.3	)%
Cost of sales		25,076			18.6	%		29,440			20.3	%		(4,364	)		(14.8	)%		8,389			20.6	%		8,553			19.3	%		(164	)		(1.9	)%
Gross profit		109,880			81.4	%		115,460			79.7	%		(5,580	)		(4.8	)%		32,319			79.4	%		35,817			80.7	%		(3,498	)		(9.8	)%

Operating expenses:
Commissions and incentives		54,296			40.2	%		57,727			39.8	%		(3,431	)		(5.9	)%		15,618			38.4	%		17,542			39.5	%		(1,924	)		(11.0	)%
Selling and administrative expenses		26,412			19.6	%		26,389			18.2	%		23			0.1	%		8,142			20.0	%		8,813			19.9	%		(671	)		(7.6	)%
Depreciation and amortization		1,324			1.0	%		1,248			0.9	%		76			6.1	%		443			1.1	%		396			0.9	%		47			11.9	%
Other operating costs		18,493			13.7	%		19,920			13.7	%		(1,427	)		(7.2	)%		7,580			18.6	%		6,555			14.8	%		1,025			15.6	%
Total operating expenses		100,525			74.5	%		105,284			72.7	%		(4,759	)		(4.5	)%		31,783			78.1	%		33,306			75.1	%		(1,523	)		(4.6	)%
Income from operations		9,355			6.9	%		10,176			7.0	%		(821	)		(8.1	)%		536			1.3	%		2,511			5.7	%		(1,975	)		(78.7	)%
Interest income		154			0.1	%		61			0.0	%		93			152.5	%
Other expense, net		(3,802	)		(2.8	)%		(1,311	)		(0.9	)%		(2,491	)		190.0	%
Interest income (expense)																				(13	)		0.0	%		30			0.1	%		(43	)		(143.3	)%
Other income (expense), net																				334			0.8	%		(932	)		(2.1	)%		1,266			135.8	%
Income before income taxes		5,707			4.2	%		8,926			6.2	%		(3,219	)		(36.1	)%		857			2.1	%		1,609			3.6	%		(752	)		(46.7	)%
Provision for income taxes		(1,397	)		(1.0	)%		(4,282	)		(3.0	)%		2,885			67.4	%
Income tax provision																				266			0.6	%		510			1.1	%		(244	)		(47.8	)%
Net income	$	4,310			3.2	%	$	4,644			3.2	%	$	(334	)		(7.2	)%	$	591			1.5	%	$	1,099			2.5	%	$	(508	)		(46.2	)%

1918

Table of Contents

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

To supplement our financial results presented in accordance with ~~generally accepted accounting principles in the United States ("GAAP"),~~GAAP, we disclose operating results that have been adjusted to exclude the impact of changes due to the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars, including changes in: Net Sales, Gross Profit, and Income from Operations. We refer to these adjusted financial measures as Constant dollar items, which are ~~Non-GAAP~~non-GAAP financial measures. We believe these measures provide investors an additional perspective on trends. To exclude the impact of changes due to the translation of foreign currencies into U.S. dollars, we calculate current year results and prior year results at a constant exchange rate, which is the prior year’s rate. Currency impact is determined as the difference between actual growth rates and constant currency growth rates. ~~Dollar amounts set forth below are expressed in millions.~~

Three month period ended
September 30,
2015

September 30,
2014
Change

GAAP
Measure:
Total $

Non-GAAP
Measure:
Constant $

GAAP
Measure:
Total $
Dollar
Percent

Net Sales $ 43.9 $ 48.2 $ 55.6 $ (7.4 ) (13.3) %
Product 35.3 38.7 45.9 (7.2 ) (15.7) %
Pack 7.1 8.0 7.8 0.2 2.6 %
Other 1.5 1.5 1.9 (0.4 ) (21.1 )%
Gross Profit 35.6 39.1 45.3 (6.2 ) (13.7 )%
Income from Operations 2.2 2.8 8.2 (5.4 ) (65.9 %

	Three months ended March 31, 2016				Three months ended March 31, 2015		Reconciliation – Constant $
	GAAP Measure: Total $		Non-GAAP Measure: Constant $		GAAP Measure: Total $		Dollar			Percent
Net sales	$	40.7	$	42.8	$	44.4	$	(1.6	)		(3.6	)%
Product		33.7		35.3		34.2		1.1			3.2	%
Pack		5.8		6.2		8.9		(2.7	)		(30.3	)%
Other		1.2		1.2		1.3		(0.1	)		(7.7	)%
Gross profit		32.3		33.8		35.8		(2.0	)		(5.6	)%
Income from operations		0.5		0.8		2.5		(1.7	)		(68.0	)%

Nine month period ended
September 30,
2015

September 30,
2014
Change

GAAP
Measure:
Total $

Non-GAAP
Measure:
Constant $

GAAP
Measure:
Total $

Dollar

Percent

Net Sales $ 135.0 $ 144.2 $ 144.9 $ (0.7 ) (0.5) %
Product 105.8 112.9 117.7 (4.8 ) (4.1) %
Pack 24.9 26.9 21.7 5.2 24.0 %
Other 4.3 4.4 5.5 (1.1 ) (20.0 )%
Gross Profit 109.9 117.2 115.5 1.7 1.5 %
Income from Operations 9.4 10.5 10.2 0.3 2.9 %

20Net Sales

~~Table of Contents~~

Consolidated net sales ~~by region~~ for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015 and 2014 were~~March 31, 2016 decreased by $3.7 million, or 8.3%, to $40.7 million, as ~~follows~~ (compared to $44.4 million for the same period in ~~millions, except percentages)~~:2015.

Net Sales in Dollars and as a Percentage of Consolidated Net Sales

Region
2015 2014
North America $ 17.8 40.6 % $ 20.4 36.6 %
Asia/Pacific 22.0 50.1 % 30.3 54.6 %
EMEA 4.1 9.3 % 4.9 8.8 %
Total $ 43.9 100.0 % $ 55.6 100.0 %

Consolidated net sales by region for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~ were as follows (in millions, except percentages):

~~Net Sales in Dollars and as a Percentage of Consolidated Net Sales~~

Region	2015				2014
North America	$	54.7	40.5	%	$	61.6	42.5	%
									Three months ended March 31, 2016				Three months ended March 31, 2015
Americas									$	16.0	39.3	%	$	18.1	40.8	%
Asia/Pacific		68.3	50.6	%		70.9	48.9	%		21.4	52.6	%		22.7	51.1	%
EMEA		12.0	8.9	%		12.4	8.6	%		3.3	8.1	%		3.6	8.1	%
Total	$	135.0	100.0	%	$	144.9	100.0	%	$	40.7	100.0	%	$	44.4	100.0	%

Net ~~Sales~~

~~Consolidated net~~ sales in the Americas, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016, decreased by ~~$11.7~~$2.1 million, or ~~21.2%~~11.6%, to ~~$43.9~~$16.0 million, as compared to $18.1 million for the same period in ~~2014. Consolidated net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $9.9 million, or 6.9%,~~2015. This decrease was primarily due to ~~$135.0 million as compared to the same period~~a 16.5% decline in ~~2014. For the three~~active independent associates and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the number of associate positions and member positions held by individuals in our network decreased and revenue per associate position and member position decreased.

North American net sales decreased by $2.6 million, or 12.7%, to $17.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. North American net sales decreased by $6.9 million, or 11.2%, to $54.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, revenue per active associate position and member position in our network increased while the number of associate positions and member positions decreased. Net sales comparisons for the three- and nine-month periods were affected by the loyalty program. Excluding the effects on net sales of the loyalty program, net sales in North America would have declined by $2.8 million, or 13.7%, for the three months ended September 30, 2015, and by $9.9 million, or 16.1%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, as compared to the same periods in 2014.members.

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, our operations outside of ~~North America~~the Americas accounted for approximately ~~59.4% and 59.5%, respectively,~~60.7% of our consolidated net sales, whereas in the same period in ~~2014,~~2015, our operations outside of ~~North America~~the Americas accounted for approximately ~~63.4% and 57.5%, respectively,~~59.2% of our consolidated net sales.

For the three months ended March 31, 2016, Asia/Pacific net sales decreased by ~~$8.3~~$1.3 million, or ~~27.4%~~5.7%, to ~~$22.0~~$21.4 million, as compared to $22.7 million for the ~~three months ended September 30, 2015~~same period in 2015. The loyalty program decreased first quarter 2016 net sales by $0.4 million, as compared to the same period in ~~2014. For~~2015. Foreign currency exchange had the effect of decreasing revenue by $1.3 million when the three ~~months ended September 30, 2015,~~month period ending March 31, 2016 is compared to the same period in ~~2014,~~the prior year. The currency impact is primarily due to the weakening of the Korean Won, Australian dollar, and New Zealand dollar. This was partially offset by an increase of 1.9% in the number of active ~~associate positions~~independent associates and ~~member positions~~members during the three months ending March 31, 2016, compared to the same period in ~~our network increased while~~ the ~~revenue per active associate position and member position decreased. Net sales comparisons for the third quarter were affected by the launch~~prior year.

Table of ~~the U~~^th ~~skin care product in 2014 and the translation of foreign currency into U.S. dollars. Asia/Pacific net sales attributable to our U~~^th ~~skin care product were $0.4 million for~~Contents

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016, EMEA net sales decreased by $0.3 million, or 8.3%, to $3.3 million as compared to ~~$6.0~~$3.6 million for the same period in ~~2014. In Constant dollars (a non-GAAP financial measure discussed in more detail above), net sales would have~~2015. Active associates and members increased ~~by $3.4 million to $25.4 million, or 16.2%. The currency impact was primarily due to depreciation of the Korean Won, the Japanese Yen and the Australian Dollar.~~

~~Table of Contents~~

~~Asia/Pacific net sales decreased by $2.6 million, or 3.7%, to $68.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015~~6.9% as compared to the same period in ~~2014. For~~ the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2015,~~prior year. Foreign currency exchange had the effect of decreasing revenue by $0.7 million when the three month period ending March 31, 2016 is compared to the same period in ~~2014,~~ the number of active member positions held by individuals in our network increased and the revenue per active associate position and member position decreased. Net sales comparisons for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were affected by the launch of the U^th ~~skin care product in 2014, the loyalty program and the translation of foreign currency into U.S. dollars. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, Asia/Pacific net sales attributable to our U~~^th skin care product were $1.7 million as compared to $6.3 million during the same period in 2014. Excluding the effects on net sales of the loyalty program, net sales in Asia/Pacific would have decreased by $4.8 million, or 6.8%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. In Constant dollars (a non-GAAP financial measure discussed in more detail above), net sales would have increased to $75.4 million, or 6.3%.prior year. The currency impact ~~was primarily due to depreciation of the Korean Won, the Japanese Yen and the Australian Dollar.~~

EMEA net sales decreased by $0.8 million, or 16.3%, to $4.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to $4.9 million for the same period in 2014. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014, the number of active associate positions held by individuals in our network increased and the revenue per active associate position and member position decreased. Net sales comparisons for the third quarter were affected by the translation of foreign currency into U.S. dollars. In Constant dollars (a non-GAAP financial measure discussed in more detail above), net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2015 would have been $4.9 million. The currency impact wasis primarily due to the ~~depreciation~~weakening of the South ~~African~~Africa Rand, British Pound and ~~the~~ Euro. ~~The launch of our U~~^th ~~skin care product in 2014 in EMEA did not have a material effect on net sales comparisons.~~

EMEA net sales decreased by $0.4 million, or 3.2%, to $12.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to the same period in 2014, the number of active associate positions held by individuals in our network increased and the revenue per active associate position and member position decreased. Net sales comparisons for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were affected by the loyalty program and the translation of foreign currency into U.S. dollars. Excluding the effects on net sales of the loyalty program, net sales in EMEA would have decreased by $1.3 million, or 10.5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014. In Constant dollars (a non-GAAP financial measure discussed in more detail above), net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 would have increased 12.1% to $13.9 million; the currency impact was primarily due to the depreciation of the South African Rand and the Euro.

Our total sales and sales mix could be influenced by any of the following:

changes in our sales prices;

~~changes in consumer demand;~~

~~changes in the number of associates and members;~~

~~changes in competitors’ products;~~

~~changes in economic conditions;~~

~~changes in regulations;~~

~~announcements of new scientific studies and breakthroughs;~~

~~introduction of new products;~~

~~discontinuation of existing products;~~

~~adverse publicity;~~

~~changes in our commissions and incentives programs;~~

~~direct competition; and~~

~~fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.~~

22changes in consumer demand;

~~Table~~changes in the number of ~~Contents~~independent associates and members;

changes in competitors’ products;

changes in economic conditions;

changes in regulations;

announcements of new scientific studies and breakthroughs;

introduction of new products;

discontinuation of existing products;

adverse publicity;

changes in our commissions and incentives programs;

direct competition; and

fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.

Our sales mix for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, was as follows (in millions, except percentages):

	Three Months				Change										Change
	2015		2014		Dollar			Percentage			2016		2015		Dollar			Percentage
Consolidated product sales	$	35.3	$	45.9	$	(10.6	)		(23.1	)%	$	33.7	$	34.2	$	(0.5	)		(1.5	)%
Consolidated pack sales		7.1		7.8		(0.7	)		(9.0	)%		5.8		8.9		(3.1	)		(34.8	)%
Consolidated other, including freight		1.5		1.9		(0.4	)		(21.1	)%		1.2		1.3		(0.1	)		(7.7	)%
Total consolidated net sales	$	43.9	$	55.6	$	(11.7	)		(21.0	)%	$	40.7	$	44.4	$	(3.7	)		(8.3	)%

Nine Months Change
2015 2014 Dollar Percentage
Consolidated product sales $ 105.8 $ 117.7 $ (11.9 ) (10.1 )%
Consolidated pack sales 24.9 21.7 3.2 14.7 %
Consolidated other, including freight 4.3 5.5 (1.2 ) (21.8 )%
Total consolidated net sales $ 135.0 $ 144.9 $ (9.9 ) (6.8 )%

Pack sales correlate to new associate positions held by individuals in our network when a starter pack is purchased and to continuing associate positions held by individuals in our network ~~when~~who opt to purchase an upgrade or renewal ~~pack is purchased.~~pack. However, there is no direct correlation between product sales and the number of new and continuing associate positions and member positions held by individuals in our network because associates and members utilize products at different volumes.

Product Sales

Our product sales are made to our independent associates at published wholesale prices. We also sell our products to members at discounted published retail prices. Product sales for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 decreased by ~~$10.6~~$0.5 million, or ~~23.1%~~1.5%, as compared to the same period in ~~2014 impacted by a 9.2%~~2015. The decrease in ~~orders and~~product sales was primarily due to a ~~decrease~~reduction in ~~average order value.~~the number of orders. The average order value for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 was ~~$154~~$155 as compared to ~~$182~~$154 for the same period in ~~2014.~~

~~Product sales for~~2015. The number of orders processed during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 decreased by ~~$11.9 million, or 10.1%~~0.4%, as compared to the same period in 2014 driven by a 4.7% decrease in orders and a decrease in average order value. The average order value for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $155, as compared to $169 for the same period in 2014.

~~With respect to our loyalty program, we defer the dollar equivalent in revenue of loyalty points until we recognize the revenue attributable to points that are applied or forfeited or expired (see~~ ~~Revenue Recognition and Deferred Commissions~~ in Note 1). This year, as associates and members are utilizing more loyalty points, we are able to recognize more revenue compared to the same periods last year, resulting in a $0.6 million increase in revenue for the three months ending September 30, 2015 and a $6.1 million increase in revenue for the nine months ending September 30, 2015.

Table of Contents

Pack Sales

Packs may be purchased by our independent associates who wish to build a Mannatech business. These packs contain ~~product which is~~products that are discounted from both the published retail and associate ~~price.~~prices. There are several pack options available to our independent associates. In certain markets, pack sales are completed during the final stages of the registration process and can provide new independent associates with valuable training and promotional materials, as well as products for resale to retail customers, demonstration purposes, and personal consumption. Business-building independent associates can also purchase an upgrade pack, which provides the associate with additional promotional materials, additional products, and eligibility for additional commissions and incentives. Many of our business-building independent associates also choose to purchase renewal ~~packs to satisfy annual renewal requirements to continue to earn various commissions.~~packs.

~~Table of Contents~~

The dollar amount of pack sales associated with new and continuing ~~independent associate positions held by individuals in our network~~associates was as follows, for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30~~March 31 (in millions, except percentages):

Three Months ended
September 30
Change
2015 2014 Dollar Percentage
New $ 2.4 $ 2.4 $ 0.0 0.0 %
Continuing 4.7 5.4 (0.7 ) (13.0 )%
Total $ 7.1 $ 7.8 $ (0.7 ) (9.0 )%

	Nine Months ended September 30				Change						Three months ended March 31				Change
	2015		2014		Dollar			Percentage				2016		2015		Dollar		Percentage
New	$	6.7	$	6.8	$	(0.1	)		(1.5	)%	$	2.3	$	2.0	$	0.3		15.0	%
Continuing		18.2		14.9		3.3			22.1	%		3.5		6.9		(3.4	)	(49.3	)%
Total	$	24.9	$	21.7	$	3.2			14.7	%	$	5.8	$	8.9	$	(3.1	)	(34.8	)%

Total pack sales for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 decreased by ~~$0.7~~$3.1 million, or ~~9.0%~~34.8%, to ~~$7.1~~$5.8 million, as compared to ~~$7.8~~$8.9 million for the same period in ~~2014 reflecting a decrease in the total number of packs sold, partially offset by an increase in average pack value.~~2015. Average pack value for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 was ~~$220~~$197 as compared to ~~$201~~$236 for the same period in ~~2014. During the three month period ended September 30, 2015, the~~2015. The total number of packs sold decreased by ~~6,600,~~8,300, or ~~17.1%~~22.0%, to ~~32,100.~~

~~Total pack sales~~29,400 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015 increased by $3.2 million, or 14.7%, to $24.9 million,~~March 31, 2016, as compared to ~~$21.7 million for~~ the same period in 2014 reflecting an increase in average pack value and an increase in the total number of packs sold. Average pack value for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $236, as compared to $230 for the same period in 2014. The total number of packs sold increased by 11,200, or 11.8%, to 105,800.2015.

During ~~2014~~2015 and continuing into ~~2015,~~2016, we took the following actions to recruit and retain associates and members:

explored new international markets;

launched an aggressive marketing and educational campaign;

continued to strengthen compliance initiatives;

concentrated on publishing results of research studies and clinical trials related to our products;

initiated additional incentives;

explored new advertising and educational tools to broaden name recognition; and

implemented changes to our global associate career and compensation plan.

The approximate number of new and continuing active independent ~~associate positions held by individuals~~associates and ~~member positions in our network associated with the purchase of~~members who purchased our packs or products during the twelve months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015 ~~and 2014~~ were as follows:

	2015				2014				2016				2015
New		97,000	43.9	%		113,000	48.3	%		94,000	43.1	%		108,000	47.0	%
Continuing		124,000	56.1	%		121,000	51.7	%		124,000	56.9	%		122,000	53.0	%
Total		221,000	100.0	%		234,000	100.0	%
Total Active										218,000	100.0	%		230,000	100.0	%

~~Table~~Recruitment of ~~Contents~~

~~Recruiting~~new independent associates and members decreased ~~18.8%~~6.7% in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015~~2016 as compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2014.~~2015. The number of new independent associate ~~positions~~ and member positions held by individuals in our network for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2015~~2016 was approximately ~~23,600,~~23,800, as compared to ~~29,000~~25,500 for the same period in ~~2014.~~2015.

Other Sales

Other sales consisted of: (i) freight revenue charged to our independent associates and members; (ii) sales of promotional materials; (iii) monthly fees collected for Success ~~Tracker~~^TM Tracker™ and Navig8™ customized electronic business-building and educational materials, databases and applications; (iv) training and event registration fees; and (v) a reserve for estimated sales refunds and returns. Promotional materials, training, database applications and business management tools support our independent associates, which in turn helps stimulate product sales.

Table of Contents

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~,March 31, 2016, other sales decreased by $~~0.4~~0.1 million, or ~~21.1%~~7.7%, to ~~$1.5~~$1.2 million, as compared to ~~$1.9~~$1.3 million for the same period in ~~2014~~2015. The decrease was primarily due to ~~decreases~~the decrease in freight revenue as a result of lower sales, partially offset by a decrease in sales returns. Total revenue from freight and shipping ~~revenue. Other sales~~fees was approximately $1.3 million and $1.6 million for the ~~nine~~three month periods ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Gross Profit

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016, gross profit decreased by ~~$1.2~~$3.5 million, or ~~21.8%~~9.8%, to ~~$4.3~~$32.3 million, as compared to ~~$5.5~~$35.8 million for the same period in ~~2014. The decrease was primarily due to decreases in freight and shipping~~ ~~revenue.~~

~~Gross Profit~~

~~During the three months ended September 30,~~ 2015 ~~gross profit decreased by $9.7 million, or 21.5%, to $35.6 million, as compared to $45.3 million for the same period in 2014 primarily due to a decrease in net~~on declining sales. For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased to ~~81.2%~~79.4%, as compared to ~~81.5%~~80.7% for the same period in ~~2014.~~2015. The decline in gross profit percentage was due to an increase in transportation costs during the three month period ending March 31, 2016.

~~For~~Commission and Incentives

Commission expenses for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015 and 2014, gross profit~~March 31, 2016 decreased by ~~$5.6~~10.2%, or $1.7 million, ~~or 4.8%,~~ to ~~$109.9~~$15.2 million, as compared to ~~$115.5~~$16.9 million for the same period in 2014, primarily due to a decrease in net sales. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased to 81.4%, as compared to 79.7% for the same period in 2014.

~~Commissions and Incentives~~

Commission costs for the three months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $3.0 million, to $17.1 million, as compared to $20.1 million for the same period in 2014. The decrease in commissions was due to the decrease in commissionable net sales.2015. For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, commissions as a percentage of net sales ~~increased~~decreased to ~~39.0%~~37.4% from ~~36.1%~~38.0% for the same period in ~~2014.~~

Commission costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $3.1 million to $52.2 million, compared to $55.3 million for the same period in 2014. The decrease in commissions was due to the decrease in commissionable net sales. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, commissions as a percentage of net sales increased to 38.6% from 38.2% for the same period in 2014.2015.

Incentive costs for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 decreased by ~~$0.2~~42.9%, or $0.3 million, to ~~$0.7~~$0.4 million, as compared to ~~$0.9~~$0.7 million for the same period in ~~2014.~~2015. For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015, the costs of~~March 31, 2016, incentives as a percentage of net sales ~~increased~~decreased to ~~1.7%~~0.9% from ~~1.6%~~1.5% for the same period in ~~2014.~~2015.

Incentive costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 decreased by $0.3 million, to $2.1 million, as compared to $2.4 million for the same period in 2014. Costs of incentives as a percentage of net sales was 1.6% for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and September 30, 2014.

~~Table of Contents~~

Selling and Administrative Expenses

Selling and administrative expenses include a combination of both fixed and variable expenses. These expenses consist of compensation and benefits for employees, temporary and contract labor and marketing-related expenses, such as monthly magazine development costs and costs related to hosting our corporate-sponsored events.

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~,March 31, 2016, selling and administrative expenses decreased by ~~$0.6~~$0.7 million, or ~~5.9%~~8.0%, to ~~$9.0~~$8.1 million, as compared to ~~$9.6~~$8.8 million for the same period in ~~2014 due~~2015. The decrease in selling and administrative expenses consisted primarily of a $1.2 million decrease in marketing related costs related to ~~decreased~~our annual MannaFest event that occurred during the second quarter in 2016 and during the first quarter of 2015. This decrease was partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in payroll related costs. Selling and administrative expenses, as a percentage of net sales, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015 increased~~March 31, 2016 increased to ~~20.5%~~20.0% from ~~17.2%~~19.9% for the same period in ~~2014.~~

~~For each of the nine months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014~~, selling and administrative expenses were $26.4 million as increases in marketing were offset by decreases in distribution and payroll related costs. Selling and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales for the nine months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~ ~~increased to 19.6% from 18.2% for the same period in 2014, as net sales decreased while expenses remained approximately the same.~~2015.

Other Operating Costs

Other operating costs include travel, accounting/legal/consulting fees, credit card processing fees, banking fees, off-site storage fees, utilities, and other miscellaneous operating expenses. Changes in other operating costs are associated with the changes in our net sales.

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~,March 31, 2016, other operating costs ~~decreased 1.3%~~increased by $1.0 million, or 15.2%, to ~~$6.1~~$7.6 million, ~~due primarily~~as compared to ~~decreases~~$6.6 million for the same period in ~~office expenses and credit card processing fees offset by increases in accounting, legal, and consulting fees and travel costs.~~2015. For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~,March 31, 2016, other operating costs as a percentage of net sales increased to ~~13.8%~~18.6% from ~~11.1%~~14.8% for the same period in ~~2014 as net sales decreased. For the nine months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2015~~,2015. The increase in other operating costs ~~decreased by $1.4~~was due to a $0.6 million ~~to $18.5 million, compared to $19.9 million for the same period in 2014, due primarily to decreases~~increase in travel ~~credit card processing fees~~ and ~~office expenses. For the nine months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2015, other operating~~entertainment costs asand a ~~percentage of net sales were unchanged at 13.7% as compared to the same period~~$0.4 million increase in ~~2014~~.legal costs.

Depreciation and Amortization Expense

Depreciation and amortization expense for each of the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and 2015 ~~was unchanged at~~were $0.4 ~~million as compared to the same period in 2014.~~

~~Depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 increased to $1.3 million, as compared to $1.2 million for the same period in 2014.~~million.

Other ~~Expense,~~Income (Expense), Net

Due to foreign exchange ~~losses,~~gains and (losses), other ~~expense, net for the three months ended September 30, 2015 was $2.4~~income (expenses) were $0.3 million ~~as compared to other expense, net of $1.2~~and $(0.9) million for the ~~same period in 2014. Other expense, net for the nine months ended September 30,~~quarters ending March 31, 2016 and 2015, ~~was $3.8 million, as compared to other expense, net of $1.3 million for the same period in 2014, due to foreign exchange losses.~~respectively.

2622

Table of Contents

Provision (benefit) for Income Taxes

Provision (benefit) for income taxes ~~includes~~include current and deferred income taxes for both our domestic and foreign operations. Our statutory income tax rates by jurisdiction are as follows, for the three ~~and nine months~~month periods ended ~~September 30:~~March 31:

Country	2015			2014			2016			2015
Australia		30.0	%		30.0	%		30.0	%		30.0	%
Canada		26.5	%		26.5	%		26.5	%		26.5	%
Cyprus								12.5	%		12.5	%
Colombia⁽¹⁾								25.0	%		—	%
Denmark		23.5	%		24.5	%		22.0	%		23.5	%
Gibraltar								10.0	%		10.0	%
Hong Kong								16.5	%		16.5	%
Japan		35.4	%		37.1	%		35.4	%		37.1	%
Mexico		30.0	%		30.0	%		30.0	%		30.0	%
Norway		27.0	%		27.0	%		25.0	%		27.0	%
Republic of Korea		22.0	%		22.0	%		22.0	%		22.0	%
Singapore		17.0	%		17.0	%		17.0	%		17.0	%
South Africa		28.0	%		28.0	%		28.0	%		28.0	%
Sweden		22.0	%		22.0	%		22.0	%		22.0	%
Switzerland		16.2	%		16.2	%		16.2	%		16.2	%
Taiwan		17.0	%		17.0	%		17.0	%		17.0	%
United Kingdom		20.0	%		21.0	%		20.0	%		20.0	%
United States		37.5	%		37.5	%		37.5	%		37.5	%
Cyprus		12.5	%		12.5	%
Hong Kong		16.5	%		16.5	%
Ukraine		18.0	%		18.0	%
Gibraltar		10.0	%		10.0	%
Colombia		34.0	%		—	%

⁽¹⁾ On February 13, 2016, the Company started operations in Colombia.

Income from our international operations is subject to taxation in the countries in which we operate. Although we may receive foreign income tax credits that would reduce the total amount of income taxes owed in the United States, we may not be able to fully utilize our foreign income tax credits in the United States.

We use the recognition and measurement provisions of ~~FASB ASC~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, Income Taxes (“Topic 740”), to account for income taxes. The provisions of ~~the Tax~~ Topic 740 require a company to record a valuation allowance when the “more likely than not” criterion for realizing net deferred tax assets cannot be met. Furthermore, the weight given to the potential effect of such evidence should be commensurate with the extent to which it can be objectively verified. As a result, we reviewed the operating results, as well as all of the positive and negative evidence related to realization of such deferred tax assets, to evaluate the need for a valuation allowance in each tax jurisdiction.

For each of the periods ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, we maintained the following valuation allowances for deferred tax assets totaling ~~$8.8~~$9.0 million, ~~and $9.7 million, respectively,~~ as we believe the ““more likely than ~~not”~~not” criterion for recognition and realization purposes, as defined in FASB ASC Topic 740, cannot be ~~met~~ ~~(in millions):~~met.

Country	September 30, 2015		December 31, 2014		2016		2015
Mexico	$	2.5	$	2.7	$	2.5	$	2.5
Norway		0.1		0.1
Sweden		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1
Switzerland		0.9		1.2		1.0		1.0
Taiwan		1.2		1.2		1.2		1.2
Ukraine		0.1		0.1		0.1		0.1
United States		3.9		4.3		4.0		4.0
Other Jurisdictions						0.1		0.1
Total	$	8.8	$	9.7	$	9.0	$	9.0

2723

Table of Contents

The dollar amount of the provisions for income taxes is directly related to our profitability and changes in the taxable income among countries. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, taxes were a $0.2 million benefit on a $0.1 million pretax loss due to a return to provision adjustment, resulting in an effective tax rate of 175.5%. For the nine months ended September 30,March 31, 2016 and 2015, the Company’s effective ~~income~~ tax rate was ~~24.5%.~~31.0% and 31.7%, respectively. For ~~the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company’s effective income tax rate was 27.6% and 48.0%, respectively.~~

~~The effective tax rate for~~ the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016, the effective tax rate was lower than what would have been expected. Items decreasing the effective income tax rates were primarily favorable rate differences in foreign jurisdictions, valuation allowance and foreign income tax credit attributable to profit positions in certain foreign jurisdictions. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, ~~was higher~~the effective tax rates were slightly lower than what would have been expected if the U.S. federal statutory rate were applied to income before taxes. ~~Items increasing the effective tax rate include a return to provision adjustment offset by favorable rate differences from foreign jurisdictions and the utilization of foreign income tax credit.~~ The ~~effective tax rate for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was lower than what would have been expected if the federal statutory rate were applied to income before taxes. Items decreasing~~decrease in the effective income tax ~~rate included~~ rates was primarily due to favorable rate differences ~~from~~in foreign jurisdictions and release of valuation allowance due to ~~the overall profitability improvement during this period.~~

The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was lower than what would have been expected if the federal statutory rate were applied to income before taxes. Items decreasing the effective income tax rate include the favorable rate differences fromprofit in certain foreign jurisdictions, ~~due to~~partially offset by permanent differences between the ~~overall~~ ~~profitability~~ tax code and the utilization of foreign income tax credit. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was higher than what would have been expected if the federal statutory rate were applied to income before taxes. Items increasing the effective income tax rate included the change in the valuation allowances associated with certain deferred tax assets and subpart F income resulting from controlled foreign corporation operations.

U.S. GAAP.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash and Cash Equivalents

As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, our cash and cash equivalents increased by ~~26.0%~~5.0%, or ~~$7.3~~$1.6 million, to ~~$35.3~~$33.6 million from ~~$28.0~~$32.0 million as of December 31, ~~2014. Our~~2015. At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, our restricted cash ~~balance decreased during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 by $0.6~~balances were $8.3 and $8.1 million, ~~to $8.0 million from $8.6 million. Fluctuations~~respectively. Finally, fluctuations in currency rates produced an increase of ~~$1.1~~$0.5 million and $0.3 million in cash and cash equivalents ~~during~~for the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2015.~~three month periods ending March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Our principal use of cash is to pay for operating expenses, including commissions and incentives, capital assets, inventory purchases, and international expansion. The quarterly cash dividend has been suspended since August 2009. Business objectives, operations, and expansion of operations are funded through net cash flows from operations rather than incurring long-term debt.

Working Capital

Working capital represents total current assets less total current liabilities. At ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, our working capital increased by ~~$5.5~~$0.6 million, or 2.6%, to ~~$21.9~~$24.1 million from ~~$16.4~~$23.5 million at December 31, ~~2014.~~2015. The ~~increase in~~most significant changes to working capital ~~is primarily related~~were due to ~~an increase in cash~~inventory and ~~inventories, offset by an increase in accrued expenses and commissions and incentives~~accounts payable. ~~Our working capital is also significantly impacted by deferred revenue and deferred costs (see~~ ~~Revenue Recognition and Deferred Commissions~~ ~~in Note 1: Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the unaudited consolidated financial statements).~~

Net Cash Flows

Our net consolidated cash flows consisted of the following, for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30~~March 31 (in millions):

Provided by/(used in):	2015			2014
Provided by / (used in):							2016			2015
Operating activities	$	7.8		$	14.5		$	2.2		$	1.2
Investing activities	$	(1.6	)	$	(2.2	)	$	(0.7	)	$	(0.8	)
Financing activities	$	(0.1	)	$	(1.0	)	$	(0.4	)	$	(0.3	)

Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities was ~~$7.8~~$2.2 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~,March 31, 2016, as compared to cash provided by operating activities of ~~$14.5~~$1.2 million for the same period in ~~2014. Operating cash flow declined~~2015. During the three months ended March 31, 2016, our accounts payable increased as we purchased inventory. Also, due to the ~~purchases of inventories and decreases in deferred revenue and deferred costs.~~ ~~We defer certain components~~timing of our ~~revenue and~~ commission ~~expense as discussed in~~ ~~Revenue Recognition and Deferred Commissions~~ ~~in Note 1 Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies. We defer~~payments, we used less cash to pay commissions during the ~~recognition of revenue on payments received and related commission expenses on payments made. Payments received related to the revenue deferral were a use of $0.2 million cash for the nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015, as~~March 31, 2016, compared to ~~a source of $6.5 million for~~ the same period in ~~2014. Commission payments related to the reduced expense deferral was a source of $0.2 million in cash for the nine months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2015, as compared to a use of $2.4 million for the same period in 2014.~~2015.

~~Table of Contents~~

Investing Activities

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~,March 31, 2016, we invested ~~cash of $1.6 million as compared to $2.2 million for the same period in 2014. During the nine months ended~~ ~~September 30, 2015, we invested $1.2~~$0.7 million in back-office software projects and ~~$0.4~~leasehold improvements, compared to $0.8 million in ~~leasehold improvements~~back-office software projects for the same period in ~~various international offices and training centers.~~2015.

Financing Activities

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~ ~~and 2014,~~March 31, 2016, we used ~~$1.3~~$0.4 million ~~and $1.1 million, respectively,~~ in the repayment of capital lease obligations. For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2015, ~~the cash~~we used $0.4 million in the repayment of capital lease obligations, which was ~~substantially~~partially offset by ~~funding from a capital financing agreement and~~ cash provided by the exercise of stock options.

Table of Contents

General Liquidity and Cash Flows

Short Term Liquidity

We believe our existing liquidity and anticipated return to positive cash flows from operations are adequate to fund our normal expected future business operations and possible international expansion costs for the next 12 months. As our primary source of liquidity is our cash flow from operations, this will be dependent on our ability to maintain and increase revenue and/or continue to reduce operational expenses. However, if our existing capital resources or cash flows become insufficient to meet current business plans, projections, and existing capital requirements, we may be required to raise additional funds, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.

We are engaged in ongoing audits in various tax jurisdictions and other disputes in the normal course of business. It is impossible at this time to predict whether we will incur any liability, or to estimate the ranges of damages, if any, in connection with these matters. Adverse outcomes on these uncertainties may lead to substantial liability or enforcement actions that could adversely affect our cash position. For more information, see Note 3 Income Taxes and Note 7 Litigation to our consolidated financial statements.

Long Term Liquidity

We believe our ~~positive~~ cash flows from operations should be adequate to fund our normal expected future business operations and possible international expansion costs for the long term. As our primary source of liquidity is from our cash flows from operations, this will be dependent on our ability to maintain and ~~increase~~and/or improve revenue ~~and/or continue~~as compared to ~~reduce~~ operational expenses.

However, if our existing capital resources or cash flows become insufficient to meet anticipated business plans and existing capital requirements, we may be required to raise additional funds, which may not be available on favorable terms, if at all.

Our future access to the capital markets may be adversely impacted if we fail to maintain compliance with the Nasdaq Marketplace Rules for the continued listing of our stock. We continuously monitor our compliance with the Nasdaq continued listing rules.

~~Table of Contents~~

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The following summarizes our future commitments and obligations associated with various agreements and contracts as of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, for the years ending December 31 (in thousands):

	Remaining 2015		2016		2017		2018		2019		2020		Thereafter		Total
Capital lease obligations and other financing		236		752		607		238		49		13		—		1,895
Purchase obligations^{(1) (2)}		5, 157		288		—		—		—		—		—		5,445
Commitments and obligations																	Remaining 2016		2017		2018		2019		2020		Thereafter		Total
Capital lease obligations																	$	354	$	370	$	205	$	53	$	13	$	—	$	995
Purchase obligations⁽¹⁾⁽²⁾																		4,970		—		—		—		—		—		4,970
Operating leases		459		1,705		1,417		773		296		111		—		4,761		1,284		1,519		806		309		118		—		4,036
Employment agreements		356		1,068		—		—		—		—		—		1,424		1,086		277		—		—		—		—		1,363
Royalty agreement		2		—		—		—		—		—		—		2		44		59		59		59		59		6		286
Tax liability ⁽³⁾		34		253		509		—		—		—		—		796		118		534		—		—		—		150		802
Notes Payable		100		400		400		267		—		—		—		1,167
Notes payable and other financing arrangements																		812		648		579		—		—		—		2,039
Other obligations⁽⁴⁾		146		238		158		54		50		50		599		1,295		327		178		53		52		105		749		1,464
Total commitments and obligations		6,490		4,704		3,091		1,332		395		174		599		16,785	$	8,995	$	3,585	$	1,702	$	473	$	295	$	905	$	15,955

(1)

For purposes of the table, a purchase obligation is defined as an agreement to purchase goods or services that is non-cancelable, enforceable and legally binding on the Company that specifies all significant terms, including: fixed or minimum quantities to be purchased; fixed, minimum or variable price provisions; and the approximate timing of the transaction.

(2)	Excludes approximately ~~$8.1~~$12.5 million of finished product purchase orders that may be cancelled or with delivery dates that have changed as of ~~September 30, 2015.~~March 31, 2016.

(3)	Represents the tax liability associated with uncertain tax positions, see Note 3 "“Income ~~Taxes~~Taxes”" to our consolidated financial statements.

(4)	Other obligations are composed of pension obligations related to the ~~Company’s~~Company's international operations (approximately $1.0 million) and lease restoration obligations (approximately $0.4 million).

Table of Contents

We have maintained purchase commitments with certain raw material suppliers to purchase minimum quantities and to ensure exclusivity of our raw materials and the proprietary nature of our products. Currently, we have one supply agreement that requires minimum purchase commitments. We also maintain other supply agreements and manufacturing agreements to protect our products, regulate product costs, and help ensure quality control standards. These agreements do not require us to purchase any set minimums. We have no present commitments or agreements with respect to acquisitions or purchases of any manufacturing facilities; however, management from time to time explores the possible benefits of purchasing a raw material manufacturing facility to help control costs of our raw materials and help ensure quality control standards.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We do not have any special-purpose entity arrangements, nor do we have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The application of GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported values of assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period, and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We use estimates throughout our financial statements, which are influenced by management’s judgment and uncertainties. Our estimates are based on historical trends, industry standards, and various other assumptions that we believe are applicable and reasonable under the circumstances at the time the consolidated financial statements are prepared. Our Audit Committee reviews our critical accounting policies and estimates. We continually evaluate and review our policies related to the portrayal of our consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations that require the application of significant judgment by our management. We also analyze the need for certain estimates, including the need for such items as allowance for doubtful accounts, inventory reserves, long-lived fixed assets and capitalization of internal-use software development costs, reserve for uncertain income tax positions and tax valuation allowances, revenue recognition, sales returns, and deferred revenues, accounting for stock-based compensation, and contingencies and litigation. Historically, actual results have not materially deviated from our estimates. However, we caution readers that actual results could differ from our estimates and assumptions applied in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. If circumstances change relating to the various assumptions or conditions used in our estimates, we could experience an adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. We have identified the following applicable critical accounting policies and estimates as of ~~September 30, 2015:~~March 31, 2016.

~~Table of Contents~~

Inventory Reserves

Inventory consists of raw materials, finished goods, and promotional materials that are stated at the lower of cost (using standard costs that approximate average costs) or market. We record the amounts charged by the vendors as the costs of inventory. Typically, the net realizable value of our inventory is higher than the aggregate cost. Determination of net realizable value can be complex and, therefore, requires a high degree of judgment. In order for management to make the appropriate determination of net realizable value, the following items are considered: inventory turnover statistics, current selling prices, seasonality factors, consumer demand, regulatory changes, competitive pricing, and performance of similar products. If we determine the carrying value of inventory is in excess of estimated net realizable value, we write down the value of inventory to the estimated net realizable value.

We also review inventory for obsolescence in a similar manner and any inventory identified as obsolete is reserved or written off. Our determination of obsolescence is based on assumptions about the demand for our products, product expiration dates, estimated future sales, and general future plans. We monitor actual sales compared to original projections, and if actual sales are less favorable than those originally projected by us, we record an additional inventory reserve or write-down. Historically, our estimates have been close to our actual reported amounts. However, if our estimates regarding inventory obsolescence are inaccurate or consumer demand for our products changes in an unforeseen manner, we may be exposed to additional material losses or gains in excess of our established estimated inventory reserves.

Long Lived Fixed Assets and Capitalization of Software Development Costs

In addition to capitalizing long lived fixed asset costs, we also capitalize costs associated with internally-developed software projects (collectively “fixed assets”) and amortize such costs over the estimated useful lives of such fixed assets. Fixed assets are carried at cost, less accumulated depreciation computed using the straight-line method over the assets’ estimated useful lives. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of the remaining lease terms or the estimated useful lives of the improvements. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to operations as incurred. If a fixed asset is sold or otherwise retired or disposed of, the cost of the fixed asset and the related accumulated depreciation or amortization is written off and any resulting gain or loss is recorded in other operating costs in our consolidated statement of operations.

Table of Contents

We review our fixed assets for impairment whenever an event or change in circumstances indicates the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable, such as plans to dispose of an asset before the end of its previously estimated useful life. Our impairment review includes a comparison of future projected cash flows generated by the asset, or group of assets, with its associated net carrying value. If the net carrying value of the asset or group of assets exceeds expected cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges), an impairment loss is recognized to the extent the carrying amount exceeds the fair value. The fair value is determined by calculating the discounted expected future cash flows using an estimated risk-free rate of interest. Any identified impairment losses are recorded in the period in which the impairment occurs. The carrying value of the fixed asset is adjusted to the new carrying value, and any subsequent increases in fair value of the fixed asset are not recorded. In addition, if we determine the estimated remaining useful life of the asset should be reduced from our original estimate; the periodic depreciation expense is adjusted prospectively, based on the new remaining useful life of the fixed asset.

The impairment calculation requires us to apply judgment and estimates concerning future cash flows, strategic plans, useful lives, and discount rates. If actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions, we may be exposed to an additional impairment charge, which could be material to our results of operations. In addition, if accounting standards change, or if fixed assets become obsolete, we may be required to write off any unamortized costs of fixed assets, or if estimated useful lives change, we would be required to accelerate depreciation or amortization periods and recognize additional depreciation expense in our consolidated statement of operations.

~~Table of Contents~~

Historically, our estimates and assumptions related to the carrying value and the estimated useful lives of our fixed assets have not materially deviated from actual results. As of ~~September 30, 2015 and December~~March 31, ~~2014,~~2016, the estimated useful lives and net carrying values of fixed assets were as follows:

	Estimated useful life	Net carrying value at March 31, 2016 ~~September 30, 2015~~
Office furniture and equipment	5 to 7 years	$	0.4 million
Computer hardware and software	3 to 5 years	$	~~2.4~~2.1 million
Automobiles	3 to 5 years		— million
Leasehold improvements	2 to 10 years⁽¹⁾		~~1.2~~1.1 million
~~Office furniture and equipment~~	~~5 to 7 years~~		~~0.5 million~~
~~Automobiles~~	~~3 to 5 years~~		~~—million~~
Total net carrying value at ~~September~~ ~~30, 2015~~ March 31, 2016		$	~~4.1 Million~~

	~~Estimated useful life~~	~~Net carrying value at~~ ~~December 31, 2014~~
~~Computer hardware and software~~	~~3 to 5 years~~	$	~~0.6~~3.6 million
~~Leasehold improvements~~	~~2 to 10 years~~⁽¹⁾		~~1.4 million~~
~~Office furniture and equipment~~	~~5 to 7 years~~		~~0.4 million~~
~~Automobiles~~	~~3 to 5 years~~		~~0.1 million~~
~~Total net carrying value at~~ ~~December 31, 2014~~		$	~~2.5 million~~

~~(1)~~

⁽¹⁾We amortize leasehold improvements over the shorter of the useful estimated life of the leased asset or the lease term.

The net carrying costs of fixed assets ~~and construction in progress~~ are exposed to impairment losses if our assumptions and estimates of their carrying values change, there is a change in estimated future cash flow, or there is a change in the estimated useful life of the fixed asset. Based on management’s analysis, no impairment indicators existed for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2016 and the year ended December 31, 2015.

Uncertain Income Tax Positions and Tax Valuation Allowances

As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, we recorded $0.7 million in other long-term liabilities and $0.1 million in taxes payable on our consolidated balance sheet related to uncertain income tax positions. As required by FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes, we use judgments and make estimates and assumptions related to evaluating the probability of uncertain income tax positions. We base our estimates and assumptions on the potential liability related to an assessment of whether the income tax position will “more likely than not” be sustained in an income tax audit. We are also subject to periodic audits from multiple domestic and foreign tax authorities related to income tax and other forms of taxation. These audits examine our tax positions, timing of income and deductions, and allocation procedures across multiple jurisdictions. As part of our evaluation of these tax issues, we establish reserves in our consolidated financial statements based on our estimate of current probable tax exposures. Depending on the nature of the tax issue, we could be subject to audit over several years. Therefore, our estimated reserve balances and liability related to uncertain income tax positions may exist for multiple years before the applicable statute of limitations expires or before an issue is resolved by the taxing authority. Additionally, we may be requested to extend the statute of limitations for tax years under ~~audit,~~audit. It is reasonably possible the tax jurisdiction may request that the statute of limitations be extended, which may cause the classification between current and long-term to change. We believe our tax liabilities related to uncertain tax positions are based upon reasonable judgment and estimates; however, if actual results materially differ, our effective income tax rate and cash flows could be affected in the period of discovery or resolution. There are ongoing income tax audits in various international jurisdictions that we believe are not material to our financial statements.

Table of Contents

We also review the estimates and assumptions used in evaluating the probability of realizing the future benefits of our deferred tax assets and record a valuation allowance when we believe that a portion or all of the deferred tax assets may not be realized. If we are unable to realize the expected future benefits of our deferred tax assets, we are required to provide a valuation allowance. We use our past history and experience, overall profitability, future management plans, and current economic information to evaluate the amount of valuation allowance to record. As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, we maintained a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets arising from our operations of ~~$8.8~~$9.0 million because they did not meet the ~~“more~~“more likely than not” criteria as defined by the recognition and measurement provisions of FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. In addition, as of ~~September 30, 2015 and December~~March 31, ~~2014,~~2016, we had deferred tax assets, after valuation allowance, totaling ~~$5.4~~$4.2 million, ~~and $4.3 million, respectively,~~ which may not be realized if our assumptions and estimates change, which would affect our effective income tax rate and cash flows in the period of discovery or resolution.

~~Table of Contents~~

Revenue Recognition and Deferred Commissions

Our revenue is derived from sales of individual products, sales of starter and renewal packs, and shipping fees. Substantially all of our product and pack sales are ~~made~~ to associates at published wholesale prices and to members at discounted published retail prices. We record revenue net of any sales taxes and record a reserve for expected sales returns based on historical experience.

We recognize revenue from shipped packs and products upon receipt by the customer. Corporate-sponsored event revenue is recognized when the event is held. We defer certain components of revenue. At ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~,2015, deferred revenue was ~~$10.5~~$9.9 million and ~~$10.9~~$8.7 million, respectively. When participating in the Company’s loyalty program, customers earn loyalty points from qualified automatic orders ~~which~~that can be applied to future purchases. We defer the dollar equivalent in revenue of these points until the points are applied, forfeited or expired, which includes an estimate of the percentage of the unvested loyalty points that are expected to be forfeited or expired. ~~During the third quarter 2014, we modified the program to allow loyalty points to vest more quickly.~~ The deferred revenue associated with the loyalty program at ~~September 30, 2015~~each of March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~2015 was ~~$7.9~~$8.4 million and ~~$9.7~~$8.1 million, respectively. Deferred revenue consisted primarily of: (i) sales of packs and products shipped but not received by the customers by the end of the respective period; (ii) revenue from the loyalty program; and (iii) prepaid registration fees from customers planning to attend a future corporate-sponsored event. In total current assets, ~~we defer~~the Company defers commissions on (i) the sales of packs and products shipped but not received by the customers by the end of the respective period and (ii) the loyalty program. ~~Deferred commissions were $4.2 million and $4.5 million at~~ ~~September 30, 2015~~At March 31, 2016 and December 31, ~~2014~~,2015, deferred commissions were $4.0 million and 3.4 million, respectively.

Loyalty program	(in thousands)
Loyalty deferred revenue as of January 1, 2015	$	9,703
Loyalty points forfeited or expired		(8,801	)
Loyalty points used		(15,077	)
Loyalty points vested		20,403
Loyalty points unvested		1,845
Loyalty deferred revenue as of December 31, 2015	$	8,073

Loyalty deferred revenue as of January 1, 2016	$	8,073
Loyalty points forfeited or expired		(1,535	)
Loyalty points used		(4,063	)
Loyalty points vested		3,672
Loyalty points unvested		2,276
Loyalty deferred revenue as of March 31, 2016	$	8,423

Product Return Policy

We stand behind our packs and products and believe we offer a reasonable and industry-standard product return policy to all of our customers. We do not resell returned products. Refunds are not processed until proper approval is obtained. All refunds must be processed and returned in the same form of payment that was originally used in the sale. Each country in which we operate has specific product return guidelines. However, we allow our associates and members to exchange products as long as the products are unopened and in good condition. Our return policies for our retail customers and our associates and members are as follows:

Table of Contents

Retail Customer Product Return Policy. This policy allows a retail customer to return any of our products to the original associate who sold the product and receive a full cash refund from the associate for the first 180 days following the product’s purchase if located in the United States and Canada, and for the first 90 days following the product’s purchase in the remaining countries. The associate may then return or exchange the product based on the associate ~~position~~ product return policy.

Associate and Member Product Return Policy. This policy allows the associate or member to return an order within one year of the purchase date upon terminating his/her account. If an associate or member returns a product unopened and in good condition, he/she may receive a full refund minus a 10% restocking fee. We may also allow the associate or member to receive a full satisfaction guarantee refund if they have tried the product and are not satisfied for any reason, excluding promotional materials. This satisfaction guarantee refund applies in the United States and Canada, only for the first 180 days following the product’s purchase, and applies in the remaining countries for the first 90 days following the product’s purchase; however, any commissions earned by an associate will be deducted from the refund. If we discover abuse of the refund policy, we may terminate the associate’s or member’s account.

Historically, sales returns estimates have not materially deviated from actual sales returns, as the majority of our customers who return merchandise do so within the first 90 days after the original sale. Based upon our return policies and historical experience, we estimate a sales return reserve for expected sales refunds over a rolling six month period. If actual results differ from our estimated sales returns reserves due to various factors, the amount of revenue recorded each period could be materially affected. Historically, our sales returns have not materially changed through the years and have averaged 1.5% or less of our gross sales.

~~Table of Contents~~

Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation

We grant stock options to our employees, board members, and consultants. At the date of grant, we determine the fair value of a stock option award and recognize compensation expense over the requisite service period, or the vesting period of such stock option award, which is two to ~~three~~four years. The fair value of the stock option award is calculated using the Black-Scholes option-pricing ~~model (“calculated fair value”).~~model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires us to apply judgment and use highly subjective assumptions, including expected stock option life, expected volatility, expected average risk-free interest rates, and expected forfeiture rates. ~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, our assumptions and estimates used for the calculated fair value of stock options granted in 2015 were as follows:~~

April
2015
Grant

May
2015
Grant

August
2015
Grant

Estimated fair value per share of options granted: $ 11.34 $ 12.80 $ 10.36
Assumptions:
Annualized dividend yield — % — % — %
Risk-free rate of return 1.2 % 1.4 % 1.4 %
Common stock price volatility 79.4 % 79.1 % 79.2 %
Expected average life of stock options (in years) 4.5 4.5 4.5

The assumptions we use are based on our best estimates and involve inherent uncertainties related to market conditions that are outside of our control. If actual results are not consistent with the assumptions we use, the stock-based compensation expense reported in our consolidated financial statements may not be representative of the actual economic cost of stock-based compensation. For example, if actual employee forfeitures significantly differ from our estimated forfeitures, we may be required to make an adjustment to our consolidated financial statements in future periods. ~~As of September 30, 2015, using our current assumptions and estimates, we anticipate recognizing $0.7 million in gross compensation expense through 2018 related to unvested stock options outstanding.~~

If we grant additional stock options in the future, we would be required to recognize additional compensation expense over the vesting period of such stock options in our consolidated statement of operations. As of ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, we had ~~164,474~~94,282 shares available for grant in the future. We did not grant any stock options during the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Contingencies and Litigation

Each quarter, we evaluate the need to establish a reserve for any legal claims or assessments. We base our evaluation on our best estimates of the potential liability in such matters. The legal reserve includes an estimated amount for any damages and the probability of losing any threatened legal claims or assessments. We consult with our general and outside counsel to determine the legal reserve, which is based upon a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. Although we believe that our legal reserve and accruals are based on reasonable judgments and estimates, actual results could differ, which may expose us to material gains or losses in future periods. If actual results differ, if circumstances change, or if we experience an unanticipated adverse outcome of any legal action, including any claim or assessment, we would be required to recognize the estimated amount which could reduce net income, earnings per share, and cash flows.

Table of Contents

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

See Note 10, Recent Accounting Pronouncements, ~~in the Notes~~ to our ~~Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements.~~consolidated financial statements

~~Table of Contents~~

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We do not engage in trading market risk sensitive instruments and do not purchase investments as hedges or for purposes “other than trading” that are likely to expose us to certain types of market risk, including interest rate, commodity price, or equity price risk. Although we have investments, we believe there has been no material change in our exposure to interest rate risk. We have not issued any variable rate debt instruments, entered into any forward or futures contracts, purchased any options, or entered into any swap agreements.

We are exposed, however, to other market risks, including changes in currency exchange rates as measured against the United States dollar. Because the change in value of the United States dollar measured against foreign currency may affect our consolidated financial results, changes in foreign currency exchange rates could positively or negatively affect our results as expressed in United States dollars. For example, when the United States dollar strengthens against foreign currencies in which our products are sold or weakens against foreign currencies in which we may incur costs, our consolidated net sales or related costs and expenses could be adversely affected. We translate our revenues and expenses in foreign markets using an average rate. We believe inflation has not had a material impact on our consolidated operations or profitability.

We maintain policies, procedures, and internal processes in an effort to help monitor any significant market risks and we do not use any financial instruments to manage our exposure to such risks. We assess the anticipated foreign currency working capital requirements of our foreign operations and maintain a portion of our cash and cash equivalents denominated in foreign currencies sufficient to satisfy most of these anticipated requirements.

Table of Contents

We caution that we cannot predict with any certainty our future exposure to such currency exchange rate fluctuations or the impact, if any, such fluctuations may have on our future business, product pricing, operating expenses, and on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. However, to combat such market risk, we closely monitor our exposure to currency fluctuations. The regions and countries in which we currently have exposure to foreign currency exchange rate risk ~~include:~~include (i) ~~North America~~the Americas (Canada, Colombia and Mexico); (ii) EMEA (Austria, the Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Germany, the Republic of Ireland, the Netherlands, Norway, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom); ~~and~~ (iii) Asia/Pacific (Australia, Japan, New Zealand, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong). The current (spot) rate, average currency exchange rates, and the low and high of such currency exchange rates as compared to the United States dollar, for each of these countries as of and for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2015~~March 31, 2016 were as follows:

	Three months ended March 31, 2016						As of March 31, 2016
Country (foreign currency name)	Low		High		Average		Spot
Australia (Australian Dollar)		0.68691		0.76549		0.72185		0.76549
Canada (Canadian Dollar)		0.68483		0.76969		0.72844		0.76788
Colombia (Peso)		0.00029		0.00033		0.00031		0.00033
Czech Republic (Koruna)		0.03980		0.04186		0.04081		0.04182
Denmark (Kroner)		0.14414		0.15181		0.14781		0.15181
Hong Kong (Hong Kong Dollar)		0.12785		0.12903		0.12864		0.12897
Japan (Yen)		0.00825		0.00898		0.00867		0.00889
Mexico (Peso)		0.05237		0.05810		0.05553		0.05789
New Zealand (New Zealand Dollar)		0.63880		0.68968		0.66428		0.68968
Norway (Krone)		0.11191		0.12003		0.11591		0.11983
Republic of Korea (Won)		0.00081		0.00087		0.00084		0.00087
Singapore (Singapore Dollar)		0.69341		0.73944		0.71276		0.73944
South Africa (Rand)		0.05949		0.06651		0.06330		0.06651
Sweden (Krona)		0.11607		0.12239		0.11834		0.12239
Switzerland (Franc)		0.97787		1.03649		1.00671		1.03649
Taiwan (New Taiwan Dollar)		0.02968		0.03111		0.03024		0.03093
United Kingdom (British Pound)		1.38762		1.48045		1.43328		1.43950
Various countries ⁽¹⁾ (Euro)		1.07517		1.13138		1.10272		1.13138

Nine months ended September 30, 2015

As of
September 30, 2015

Country (foreign currency name) Low High Average Spot
Australia (Australian Dollar) 0.69196 0.82330 0.76396 0.69781
Various countries ⁽¹⁾ (Euro)
1.04993 1.21430 1.11577 1.12447
Canada (Canadian Dollar) 0.74577 0.86220 0.79553 0.74577
Czech Republic (Koruna) 0.03840 0.04380 0.04081 0.04130
Denmark (Kroner) 0.14069 0.16310 0.14962 0.15073
Hong Kong (Hong Kong Dollar) 0.12875 0.12904 0.12899 0.12903
Japan (Yen) 0.00797 0.00857 0.00827 0.00835
Mexico (Peso) 0.05828 0.06885 0.06440 0.05858
New Zealand (New Zealand Dollar) 0.62709 0.78430 0.71261 0.63349
Norway (Krone) 0.11709 0.13702 0.12678 0.11764
Republic of Korea (Won) 0.00083 0.00094 0.00089 0.00084
Singapore (Singapore Dollar) 0.69970 0.75781 0.73412 0.69970
South Africa (Rand) 0.07133 0.08805 0.08177 0.07133
Sweden (Krona) 0.11330 0.12900 0.11906 0.11877
Switzerland (Franc) 0.98100 1.17090 1.05090 1.02870
Taiwan (New Taiwan Dollar) 0.03005 0.03298 0.03184 0.03024
United Kingdom (British Pound) 1.46339 1.58880 1.53288 1.51666

⁽¹⁾^{Austria, Germany, the Netherlands,}Estonia, Finland, the Republic of Ireland^{and Spain}

~~Table of Contents~~

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and our Chief ~~Accounting~~Financial Officer (principal financial officer), have concluded, based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this report, that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) or Rule ~~15d – 15(e)~~15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in such reports is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2015,~~March 31, 2016, there were no changes in our internal control over our financial reporting that we believe materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

3631

Table of Contents

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

See ~~“Litigation” in~~ Note 7, “Litigation,” of ~~the~~our Notes to ~~our~~ Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A.

~~Item1A.~~

Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2014,~~2015, which could materially affect our business or our consolidated financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks we face. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be insignificant also may become materially adverse or may affect our business in the future or our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information

None.

Item 6.

Exhibits

See Index to Exhibits following the signature page of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

3732

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MANNATECH, INCORPORATED

Dated: ~~November~~May 10, ~~2015~~ 2016	By:	~~/s/~~ /s/ Alfredo Bala
		Alfredo Bala
		Chief Executive Officer
		(principal executive officer)


Dated: ~~November~~May 10, ~~2015~~2016	By:	/s/ David A. Johnson
		David A. Johnson
		Chief ~~Accounting~~Financial Officer
		(principal financial officer)

3833

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description Form File No. Exhibit (s) Filing Date
3.1 Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Mannatech, dated May 19, 1998. S-1 333-63133 3.1 October 28.1998
3.2 Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Mannatech, dated January 13, 2012. 8-K 000-24657 3.1 January 17, 2012
3.3 Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mannatech, dated August 25, 2014. 8-K 000-24657 3.1 August 27, 2014
4.1 Specimen Certificate representing Mannatech’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share. S-1 333-63133 4.1 October 28, 1998
31.1*
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Executive Officer of Mannatech. * * * *
31.2*
Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Financial Officer of Mannatech. * * * *
32.1*
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Executive Officer of Mannatech. * * * *
32.2*
Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Financial Officer of Mannatech. * * * *
101.INS** XBRL Instance Document ** ** ** **
101.SCH** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document ** ** ** **
101.CAL** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document ** ** ** **
101.LAB** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document ** ** ** **
101.PRE** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document ** ** ** **
101.DEF** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document ** ** ** **

		Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit Number	Exhibit Description	Form	File No.	Exhibit (s)	Filing Date
3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Mannatech, dated May 19, 1998.	S-1	333-63133	3.1	October 28, 1998
3.2	Certificate of Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Mannatech, dated January 13, 2012.	8-K	000-24657	3.1	January 17, 2012
3.3	Fifth Amended and Restated Bylaws of Mannatech, effective August 25, 2014.	8-K	000-24657	3.1	August 27, 2014
4.1	Specimen Certificate representing Mannatech’s common stock, par value $0.0001 per share.	S-1	333-63133	4.1	October 28, 1998
31.1*	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Executive Officer of Mannatech.	*	*	*	*
31.2*	Certification pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Financial Officer of Mannatech.	*	*	*	*
32.1*	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Executive Officer of Mannatech.	*	*	*	*
32.2*	Certification pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, of the Chief Financial Officer of Mannatech.	*	*	*	*
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document	*	*	*	*
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document	*	*	*	*
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document	*	*	*	*
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document	*	*	*	*
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document	*	*	*	*
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document	*	*	*	*

*	Filed herewith.

Furnished herewith. In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the information in these exhibits shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to liability under that section, and shall not be incorporated by reference into any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, except as expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.

	Three months ended September 30				Nine months ended September 30
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Total gross compensation expense	$	149	$	95	$	450	$	397
Total tax benefit associated with compensation expense		38		20		111		101
Total net compensation expense	$	111	$	75	$	339	$	296

	Foreign Currency Translation			Pension Postretirement Benefit Obligation		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, Net
Balance as of December 31, 2014	$	(457	)	$	348	$	(109	)
Current-period change ¹		432			—		432
Balance as of September 30, 2015	$	(25	)	$	348	$	323

Three month period ended	September 30, 2015				September 30, 2014		Change
	GAAP Measure: Total $		Non-GAAP Measure: Constant $		GAAP Measure: Total $		Dollar			Percent
Net Sales	$	43.9	$	48.2	$	55.6	$	(7.4	)		(13.3)	%
Product		35.3		38.7		45.9		(7.2	)		(15.7)	%
Pack		7.1		8.0		7.8		0.2			2.6	%
Other		1.5		1.5		1.9		(0.4	)		(21.1	)%
Gross Profit		35.6		39.1		45.3		(6.2	)		(13.7	)%
Income from Operations		2.2		2.8		8.2		(5.4	)		(65.9	%

Nine month period ended	September 30, 2015				September 30, 2014		Change
	GAAP Measure: Total $		Non-GAAP Measure: Constant $		GAAP Measure: Total $		Dollar			Percent
Net Sales	$	135.0	$	144.2	$	144.9	$	(0.7	)		(0.5)	%
Product		105.8		112.9		117.7		(4.8	)		(4.1)	%
Pack		24.9		26.9		21.7		5.2			24.0	%
Other		4.3		4.4		5.5		(1.1	)		(20.0	)%
Gross Profit		109.9		117.2		115.5		1.7			1.5	%
Income from Operations		9.4		10.5		10.2		0.3			2.9	%

	Three Months ended September 30				Change
	2015		2014		Dollar			Percentage
New	$	2.4	$	2.4	$	0.0			0.0	%
Continuing		4.7		5.4		(0.7	)		(13.0	)%
Total	$	7.1	$	7.8	$	(0.7	)		(9.0	)%

	April 2015 Grant			May 2015 Grant			August 2015 Grant
Estimated fair value per share of options granted:	$	11.34		$	12.80		$	10.36
Assumptions:
Annualized dividend yield		—	%		—	%		—	%
Risk-free rate of return		1.2	%		1.4	%		1.4	%
Common stock price volatility		79.4	%		79.1	%		79.2	%
Expected average life of stock options (in years)		4.5			4.5			4.5

	Nine months ended September 30, 2015						As of September 30, 2015
Country (foreign currency name)	Low		High		Average		Spot
Australia (Australian Dollar)		0.69196		0.82330		0.76396		0.69781
Various countries ⁽¹⁾ (Euro)		1.04993		1.21430		1.11577		1.12447
Canada (Canadian Dollar)		0.74577		0.86220		0.79553		0.74577
Czech Republic (Koruna)		0.03840		0.04380		0.04081		0.04130
Denmark (Kroner)		0.14069		0.16310		0.14962		0.15073
Hong Kong (Hong Kong Dollar)		0.12875		0.12904		0.12899		0.12903
Japan (Yen)		0.00797		0.00857		0.00827		0.00835
Mexico (Peso)		0.05828		0.06885		0.06440		0.05858
New Zealand (New Zealand Dollar)		0.62709		0.78430		0.71261		0.63349
Norway (Krone)		0.11709		0.13702		0.12678		0.11764
Republic of Korea (Won)		0.00083		0.00094		0.00089		0.00084
Singapore (Singapore Dollar)		0.69970		0.75781		0.73412		0.69970
South Africa (Rand)		0.07133		0.08805		0.08177		0.07133
Sweden (Krona)		0.11330		0.12900		0.11906		0.11877
Switzerland (Franc)		0.98100		1.17090		1.05090		1.02870
Taiwan (New Taiwan Dollar)		0.03005		0.03298		0.03184		0.03024
United Kingdom (British Pound)		1.46339		1.58880		1.53288		1.51666