CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

	As of June 30, 2016			As of December 31, 2015
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,042,000		$	14,338,000
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $785,000 and $797,000 in 2016 and 2015, respectively		911,000			1,052,000
Inventories, net		4,534,000			4,298,000
Other current assets		1,263,000			1,555,000
Total current assets		26,750,000			21,243,000
Property and equipment, net		1,380,000			1,631,000
Restricted cash and cash equivalents		350,000			350,000
Other assets		1,449,000			1,521,000
Intangibles, net		8,829,000			9,031,000
Goodwill		3,922,000			3,922,000
Total assets	$	42,680,000		$	37,698,000
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	6,585,000		$	6,687,000
Current portion of long-term obligations, net of discount		3,494,000			—
Joint venture purchase obligation		—			1,750,000
Total current liabilities		10,079,000			8,437,000
Deferred revenues		106,000			105,000
Long-term deferred rent and other		111,000			269,000
Long-term obligations, net of discount, less current portion		13,663,000			16,681,000
Total liabilities		23,959,000			25,492,000
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Series A 3.6% convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 13,500 shares issued; no shares outstanding in 2016 and 2015		—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 20,492,601 and 13,003,893 shares issued and outstanding in 2016 and 2015, respectively		20,000			13,000
Additional paid-in capital		386,845,000			368,214,000
Accumulated other comprehensive income		617,000			996,000
Accumulated deficit		(368,761,000	)		(357,017,000	)
Total stockholders’ equity		18,721,000			12,206,000
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	42,680,000		$	37,698,000

~~(UNAUDITED)~~

As of March
31, 2016

As of December
31, 2015

Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents $ 9,358,000 $ 14,338,000
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $795,000 and of $797,000 in 2016 and 2015, respectively 829,000 1,052,000
Inventories, net 4,462,000 4,298,000
Other current assets 1,866,000 1,555,000

Total current assets 16,515,000 21,243,000

Property and equipment, net 1,523,000 1,631,000
Restricted cash and cash equivalents 350,000 350,000
Other assets 1,682,000 1,521,000
Intangibles, net 8,923,000 9,031,000
Goodwill 3,922,000 3,922,000

Total assets $ 32,915,000 $ 37,698,000

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses $ 6,693,000 $ 6,687,000
Current portion of long-term obligations, net of discount 1,724,000 —
Joint venture purchase obligation 1,267,000 1,750,000

Total current liabilities 9,684,000 8,437,000

Deferred revenues 101,000 105,000
Long-term deferred rent and other 189,000 269,000
Long-term obligations, net of discount, less current portion 15,198,000 16,681,000

Total liabilities 25,172,000 25,492,000

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Series A 3.6% convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 13,500 shares issued; no shares outstanding in 2016 and 2015 — —
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 13,310,740 and 13,003,893 shares issued and outstanding in 2016 and 2015, respectively
13,000 13,000
Additional paid-in capital 369,339,000 368,214,000
Accumulated other comprehensive income 747,000 996,000
Accumulated deficit (362,356,000 ) (357,017,000 )

Total stockholders’ equity 7,743,000 12,206,000

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $ 32,915,000 $ 37,698,000

SEE NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~Index~~

CYTORI THERAPEUTICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE ~~LOSS~~(LOSS) INCOME

(UNAUDITED)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Product revenues	$	1,126,000		$	1,614,000		$	2,459,000		$	2,516,000
Cost of product revenues		585,000			1,296,000			1,152,000			1,894,000
Gross profit		541,000			318,000			1,307,000			622,000
Development revenues:
Government contracts and other		1,699,000			1,847,000			3,284,000			3,291,000
		1,699,000			1,847,000			3,284,000			3,291,000
Operating expenses:
Research and development		5,247,000			6,048,000			9,374,000			10,012,000
Sales and marketing		889,000			654,000			1,924,000			1,493,000
General and administrative		2,328,000			2,793,000			4,614,000			5,292,000
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities		—			(13,122,000	)		—			2,322,000
Total operating expenses		8,464,000			(3,627,000	)		15,912,000			19,119,000
Operating (loss) income		(6,224,000	)		5,792,000			(11,321,000	)		(15,206,000	)
Other income (expense):
Income (loss) on asset disposal		—			(1,000	)		2,000			8,000
Loss on debt extinguishment		—			(260,000	)		—			(260,000	)
Interest income		2,000			3,000			4,000			3,000
Interest expense		(645,000	)		(936,000	)		(1,302,000	)		(2,007,000	)
Other income (expense), net		462,000			(148,000	)		874,000			(47,000	)
Total other expense		(181,000	)		(1,342,000	)		(422,000	)		(2,303,000	)
Net (loss) income	$	(6,405,000	)	$	4,450,000		$	(11,743,000	)	$	(17,509,000	)
Beneficial conversion feature for convertible preferred stock		—			—			—			(661,000	)
Net (loss) income allocable to common stockholders	$	(6,405,000	)	$	4,450,000		$	(11,743,000	)	$	(18,170,000	)
Net income (loss) per share allocable to common stockholders
Basic	$	(0.43	)	$	0.48		$	(0.84	)	$	(2.22	)
Diluted	$	(0.43	)	$	0.45		$	(0.84	)	$	(2.22	)
Weighted average shares used in calculating net income (loss) per share allocable to common stockholders
Basic		14,778,616			9,266,141			13,932,496			8,179,403
Diluted		14,778,616			9,824,538			13,932,496			8,179,403
Comprehensive (loss) income:
Net (loss) income	$	(6,405,000	)	$	4,450,000		$	(11,743,000	)	$	(17,509,000	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income – foreign currency translation adjustments		(130,000	)		215,000			(379,000	)		251,000
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(6,535,000	)	$	4,665,000		$	(12,122,000	)	$	(17,258,000	)

~~(UNAUDITED)~~

For the Three Months Ended March 31,
2016 2015

Product revenues $ 1,333,000 $ 902,000

Cost of product revenues 567,000 598,000

Gross profit 766,000 304,000

Development revenues:
Government contracts and other 1,585,000 1,444,000

Operating expenses:
Research and development 4,127,000 3,963,000
Sales and marketing 1,035,000 839,000
General and administrative 2,286,000 2,499,000
Change in fair value of warrants — 15,444,000

Total operating expenses 7,448,000 22,745,000

Operating loss (5,097,000 ) (20,997,000 )

Other income (expense):

Interest income 2,000 1,000
Interest expense (657,000 ) (1,072,000 )
Other income, net 413,000 110,000

Total other expense (242,000 ) (961,000 )

Net loss $ (5,339,000 ) $ (21,958,000 )
Beneficial conversion feature for convertible preferred stock — (661,000 )
Net loss allocable to common stock holders $ (5,339,000 ) $ (22,619,000 )

Basic and diluted net loss per share allocable to common stockholders $ (0.41 ) $ (3.19 )

Basic and diluted weighted average shares used in calculating net loss per share allocable to common stockholders
13,086,376

7,080,590

Comprehensive loss:
Net loss $ (5,339,000 ) $ (21,958,000 )
Other comprehensive (loss) income– foreign currency translation adjustments (249,000 ) 36,000
Comprehensive loss $ (5,588,000 ) $ (21,922,000 )

SEE NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~Index~~

CYTORI THERAPEUTICS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(11,743,000	)	$	(17,509,000	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		574,000			510,000
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount		468,000			500,000
Joint Venture acquisition obligation accretion		24,000			307,000
Provision for expired inventory		26,000			—
Change in fair value of warrants		—			2,322,000
Stock-based compensation expense		645,000			1,146,000
Loss on asset disposal		2,000			—
Loss on debt extinguishment		—			260,000
Increases (decreases) in cash caused by changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		66,000			544,000
Inventories		(380,000	)		730,000
Other current assets		137,000			(106,000	)
Other assets		34,000			407,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(431,000	)		1,089,000
Deferred revenues		1,000			151,000
Long-term deferred rent		(158,000	)		(139,000	)
Net cash used in operating activities		(10,735,000	)		(9,788,000	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(105,000	)		(497,000	)
Expenditures for intellectual property		—			(13,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(105,000	)		(510,000	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments on long-term obligations		—			(25,032,000	)
Proceeds from long-term obligations		—			17,700,000
Debt issuance costs and loan fees		—			(1,854,000	)
Joint Venture purchase payments		(1,774,000	)		(1,123,000	)
Proceeds from exercise of employee stock options and warrants		—			4,986,000
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net		18,179,000			24,930,000
Dividends paid on preferred stock		—			(75,000	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		16,405,000			19,532,000
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		139,000			(14,000	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		5,704,000			9,220,000
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		14,338,000			14,622,000
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	20,042,000		$	23,842,000
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:
Cash paid during period for:
Interest	$	805,000		$	1,202,000
Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock		—			10,000
Declared dividend related to preferred stock		—			3,000

~~(UNAUDITED)~~

For the Three Months Ended March 31,
2016 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss $ (5,339,000 ) $ (21,958,000 )
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization 291,000 213,000
Amortization of deferred financing costs and debt discount 232,000 257,000
Joint venture acquisition obligation accretion 17,000 203,000
Change in fair value of warrants — 15,444,000
Stock-based compensation expense 317,000 459,000
Loss on asset disposal 2,000 —
Increases (decreases) in cash caused by changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable 155,000 546,000
Inventories (206,000 ) 100,000
Other current assets (408,000 ) (470,000 )
Other assets (211,000 ) 68,000
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 176,000 138,000
Deferred revenues (4,000 ) 21,000
Long-term deferred rent (80,000 ) (51,000 )

Net cash used in operating activities (5,058,000 ) (5,030,000 )

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment (69,000 ) (187,000 )

Net cash used in investing activities (69,000 ) (187,000 )

Cash flows from financing activities:
Joint venture purchase payments (500,000 ) (123,000 )
Proceeds from sale of common stock, net 562,000 3,974,000
Dividends paid on preferred stock — (72,000 )

Net cash provided by financing activities 62,000 3,779,000

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 85,000 15,000

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (4,980,000 ) (1,423,000 )

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 14,338,000 14,622,000

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 9,358,000 $ 13,199,000

Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:
Cash paid during period for:
Interest $ 400,000 $ 612,000

Supplemental schedule of non-cash investing and financing activities:
Conversion of preferred stock into common stock — 10,000
Declared dividend related to preferred stock — 3,000

SEE NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~Index~~

CYTORI THERAPEUTICS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~March 31, 2016~~

June 30, 2015

(UNAUDITED)

1.	Basis of Presentation

Our accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for annual financial statements. Our consolidated condensed balance sheet at ~~March~~December 31, ~~2016~~2015 has been derived from the audited financial statements at December 31, 2015, but does not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of operations of Cytori Therapeutics, Inc., and our subsidiaries (the ~~“Company”)~~Company) have been included. Operating results for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the ~~Consolidated Financial Statements~~consolidated financial statements and notes therein included in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2016.

On May 10, 2016, following stockholder and Board approval, an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation, as amended was filed and declared effective, which Amendment ~~(i)~~ effectuated a one-for-fifteen (1:15) reverse stock split of the Company’s ~~(ii)~~(i) outstanding common stock, and ~~(iii)~~(ii) common stock reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding warrants and options ~~decreased the total number of authorized shares of common stock of the Company from 290 million to 75 million (The “1;~~(the “1:15 Reverse Stock Split”). Upon effectiveness of the 1:15 Reverse Stock Split, the number of shares of the Company’s common stock (x) issued and outstanding decreased from approximately 200 million shares (as of ~~March 31,~~May 10, 2016) to approximately 1313.3 million shares; (y) reserved for issuance upon exercise of outstanding warrants and options decreased from approximately 16 million shares to approximately 1.1 million shares, and (z) reserved but unallocated under our current equity incentive plans (including the stockholder-approved share increase to the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan) decreased from approximately ~~1.5~~6.5 million common shares to approximately ~~0.1~~0.4 million common shares. In connection with the 1:15 Reverse Stock Split, the Company also decreased the total number of its authorized shares of common stock from 290 million to 75 million. The number of authorized shares of preferred stock remained unchanged. Following the ~~reverse split,~~1:15 Reverse Stock Split, certain reclassifications have been made to the prior ~~periods'~~periods’ financial statements to conform to the current period's presentation. The Company adjusted ~~shareholders'~~shareholders’ equity to reflect the ~~reverse stock split~~1:15 Reverse Stock Split by reclassifying an amount equal to the par value of the additional shares arising from the split from common stock to the Additional Paid-in Capital during the first quarter of fiscal 2016, resulting in no net impact to shareholders' equity on our consolidated balance sheets. The ~~Company has been advised that~~Company’s shares of ~~our~~ common stock ~~will commence~~commenced trading on a split-adjusted basis on May 12, 2016. ~~Fractional shares will be rounded up to~~Proportional adjustments for the ~~nearest whole share and proportional adjustments will be~~reverse stock split were made to the ~~Company’s~~Company's outstanding stock options, warrants and equity incentive ~~plans.~~

plans for all periods presented.

The following table provides a brief description of recent accounting pronouncements that had and/or could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated condensed financial statements. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the following standards on its consolidated financial statements.

New Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective

ASU Number and Name

Description

Date of Adoption

2016-09, Compensation — Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

The standard simplifies the following aspects of accounting for share-based payments awards: accounting for income taxes, classification of excess tax benefits on the statement of cash flows, forfeitures, statutory tax withholding requirements, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities and classification of employee taxes paid on statement of cash flows when an employer withholds shares for tax-withholding purposes. Transition method: Various.

January 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted.

2016-02, Leases (Topic 842)

The standard creates Topic 842, Leases which supersedes Topic 840, Leases, and introduces a lessee model that brings substantially all leases onto the balance sheet while retaining most of the principles of the existing lessor model in U.S. GAAP and aligning many of those principles with ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Transition method: modified retrospective approach with certain practical expedients.

January 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted.

2015-11, Inventory (Topic 330): Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory	The standard replaces the current lower of cost or market test with a lower of cost or net realizable value test. Transition method: prospectively.	January 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted.
2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)	The standard provides a single and comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability. The revenue standard contains principles that an entity will apply to determine the measurement of revenue and timing of when it is recognized. The standard requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers at an amount that the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. Transition method: a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach.	January 1, 2018 (as deferred by ASU No. 2015-14). Earlier application is permitted only as of January 1, 2017.
2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) — Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)	The standard clarifies how an entity should identify the unit of accounting for the principal versus agent evaluation and apply the control principle to certain types of arrangements. The amendments also re-frame the indicators to focus on evidence that an entity is acting as a principal rather than as an agent, revise existing examples and add new ones. Transition method: a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach.	January 1, 2018 (as deferred by ASU No. 2015-14). Earlier application is permitted only as of January 1, 2017.
2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing	This standard clarifies the following two aspects of Topic 606: identifying performance obligations and the licensing implementation guidance, while retaining the related principles for those areas. This standard reduces the cost and complexity of applying Topic 606 to the identification of promised goods or services, and it also includes implementation guidance on licensing. Transition method: a full retrospective or modified retrospective approach.	January 1, 2018 (as deferred by ASU No. 2015-14). Earlier application is permitted only as of January 1, 2017.
2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing	This standard addresses narrow-scope improvements to the guidance on collectability, noncash consideration, and completed contracts at transition as well as providing a practical expedient for contract modifications.	January 1, 2018 (as deferred by ASU No. 2015-14). Earlier application is permitted only as of January 1, 2017.
2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.	The amendments in this update will require management to assess, at each annual and interim reporting period, the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and, if management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued, to disclose in the notes to the entity’s financial statements the principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management’s evaluation of their significance, and management’s plans that alleviated or are intended to alleviate substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.	January 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted.

2.	Use of Estimates

The preparation of Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. ~~Actual results could differ from these estimates.~~ Our most significant estimates and critical accounting policies involve recognizing revenue, ~~estimating useful lives of long-lived~~reviewing goodwill and intangible assets for impairment, valuing warrants, determining the assumptions used in measuring share-based compensation expense, measuring accretion expense related to our acquisition of the joint venture, and valuing allowances for doubtful accounts and inventories.

Actual results could differ from these estimates. Management’s estimates and assumptions are reviewed regularly, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements in the periods they are determined to be necessary.

3.	~~Capital Availability~~ Liquidity

We incurred net losses of ~~$5.3~~$6.4 million and $11.7 million for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, respectively, and ~~$22.6~~incurred net income of $4.5 million and net losses of $17.5 million for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015,

respectively. We have an accumulated deficit of ~~$362~~$369 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. Additionally, we have used net cash of $5$10.7 million and $9.8 million to fund our operating activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and ~~2015.~~

2015, respectively.

To date, these operating losses have been funded primarily from outside sources of invested capital including our recently completed Rights Offering (discussed below), our At the Market equity facility, Loan and Security Agreement and gross profits. We have had, and we will likely continue to have, an ongoing need to raise additional cash from outside sources to fund our future ~~operations. However, our ability to raise capital was adversely affected once FDA put a hold on our Athena trials in mid-2014, which had an adverse impact to stock price performance~~clinical development programs and our corresponding ability to restructure our debt. More recently, a continued downward trend in our stock price resulting from general economic and industry conditions as well as the market’s unfavorable view of our recent equity financings (which financings were priced at a discount to market and included 100% warrant coverage) and our Nasdaq listing deficiency, have made it more difficult to procure additional capital on terms reasonably acceptable to us. The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that other operations.

On June 15, 2016, the Company ~~will continue as~~closed a ~~going concern. If we are unsuccessful~~Rights Offering originally filed under Form S-1 registration statement in ~~our efforts~~April 2016. Pursuant to ~~raise outside capital~~the Rights Offering, the Company sold an aggregate of 6,704,852 units consisting of a total of 6,704,852 shares of common stock and 3,352,306 warrants, with each warrant exercisable for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.06 per share, resulting in total gross proceeds to Cytori of $17.1 million. See Note 12 for further discussion on the near term, we will be required to significantly reduce our research, development, and administrative operations, including reduction of our employee base, in order to offset the lack of available funding.

We are pursuing financing opportunities in both the private and public debt and equity markets as well as through strategic corporate partnerships. We have an established history of raising capital through these platforms, and we are currently involved in negotiations with multiple parties. Our efforts in 2014 and 2015 to raise capital took longer than we initially anticipated. We expect to continue to utilize our cash and cash equivalents to fund operations at least through September ofJune 2016 subject to minimum cash and cash liquidity requirements of the Loan and Security Agreement with the Lender, which requires that we maintain at least $5 million of cash on hand to avoid an event of default under the Loan and Security Agreement. We continueRights Offering.

The Company continues to seek additional ~~cash~~capital through product revenues, strategic ~~collaborations,~~transactions, including extension opportunities under the awarded U.S. Department of Health and ~~future sales of equity or debt securities. Although there can~~Human Service’s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”) contract, and from other financing alternatives.

Should we be ~~no assurance given, we hope~~unable to ~~successfully complete one or more~~raise additional ~~financing transactions and corporate partnerships in the near-term. Without this additional capital, current working capital and~~ cash ~~generated~~ from sales and containment of operating costs will not provide adequate funding for research, sales and marketing efforts, clinical and preclinical trials, and product development activities at their current levels. If sufficient capital is not raised, we will at a minimum need to significantly reduce or curtail our research and development and other operations, and this could negatively affect our ability to achieve corporate goals.

~~Index~~

Specifically, we have prepared an operating plan that calls for us to reduce operations to focus almost entirely on one US clinical program and the supply of current products to existing or new distribution channels. In addition, as part of this plan, there would be minimal expenditures for ongoing scientific research, product development or clinical research. This impacts research and development headcount, external subcontractor expenditures, capital outlay and general and administrative expenditures related to the supervision of such activities. In parallel, we would significantly reduce administrative staff and salaries consistent with the overall reduction in scope of operations. In aggregate, such reductions could result in eliminations of roles for the majority of the Company’s current staff and the deferral or elimination of all ongoing development projects until such time that cash resources were available from operations or outside sources, to re-establish development and growth plans. Management is currently reviewing contractual obligations related to the pre-clinical and clinical commitments along with minimum purchase requirements to include deferral of such commitments as part of this plan. While management is actively pursuing it’s near term financial and strategic alternatives it is also, in parallel, continuing to evaluate the timing of implementation of the alternative operating plan and the initiation of the identified reductions.

will have an adverse impact on our operations.

4.	Transactions with Olympus Corporation

Under our Joint Venture Termination Agreement (“Termination Agreement”), dated May 8, 2013, with Olympus Corporation (“Olympus”), we were required to pay Olympus a total purchase price of $6 million within two years of the date of the Termination Agreement. Pursuant to amendments to the Joint Venture Termination Agreement, dated April 30, 2015 and January 8, 2016, the Company’s repayment obligations were extended through May 8, 2016. We made payments under the Termination Agreement totaling approximately $4.2 million through December 31, 2015, as well as separate payments of $0.5 million each in January 2016 and April ~~2016. We~~2016, and paid the remaining balance of $0.8 million before the May 8, 2016 due date.

There were no outstanding obligations to Olympus as of June 30, 2016.

5.	Long-term Debt

On May 29, 2015, we entered into the Loan ~~and Security~~ Agreement ~~(“Loan Agreement”)~~ with Oxford Finance LLC, ~~(“Oxford” or “Lender”),~~ pursuant to which ~~the Lender~~it funded an aggregate principal amount of $17.7 million (“Term Loan”), subject to the terms and conditions set forth in the ~~loan agreement.~~Loan Agreement. The Term Loan accrues interest at a floating rate of at least 8.95% per annum, comprised of three-month LIBOR rate with a floor of 1.00% plus 7.95%. Pursuant to the Loan Agreement, we were previously required to make interest only payments through June 1, 2016 and thereafter we were required to make payments of principal and accrued interest in equal monthly installments sufficient to amortize the Term loan through June 1, 2019, the maturity date. On February 23, 2016, ~~Cytori~~we received an acknowledgement and agreement from Oxford related to the positive data on ~~Cytori US~~our U.S. ACT-OA clinical trial. As a result, pursuant to the Loan Agreement, the period for which the Company is required to make interest-only payments was extended from July 1, 2016 to January 1, 2017. All unpaid principal and interest with respect to the Term Loan is due and payable in full on June 1, 2019. At maturity of the Term Loan, or earlier repayment in full following voluntary prepayment or upon acceleration, the Company is required to make a final payment fee in an aggregate amount equal to approximately $1.1 million. In connection with the Term Loan, on May 29, 2015, we issued to the Lender warrants to purchase an aggregate of 94,441 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $10.35 per share. These warrants are exercisable on or after November 30, 2015 and will expire on May 29, 2025 and, following the authoritative accounting guidance, are equity classified.

In connection with the Loan Agreement, we prepaid all outstanding amounts under our prior loan agreement with Oxford and Silicon Valley Bank, at which time the Company’s obligations under the prior loan agreement immediately terminated. The Company paid to the prior agent and the prior lenders (Oxford and Silicon Valley Bank) approximately $25.4 million, consisting of the then outstanding principal balance due of approximately $23.4 million, accrued but unpaid interest of approximately $0.2 million, final payment and other agency fees of approximately $1.8 million and other customary lender fees and expenses.

For Oxford, we accounted for this Term Loan as a debt modification. The Company retired $3.1 million of the principal of the previous loan and the corresponding unamortized fees were expensed. The remaining fees of $0.8 million were recorded as debt discount, and along with the new loan fees, will be amortized as an adjustment of interest expense using the effective interest method. For Silicon Valley Bank, which did not participate in the Term Loan, the payoff of the loan was accounted for as debt extinguishment. Accordingly, a total loss on debt extinguishment of $0.3 million was recorded in the second quarter of 2015, which includes the unamortized fees and discounts along with final payment fees.

~~Index~~

We allocated the aggregate proceeds of the Term Loan between the warrants and the debt obligations based on their relative fair values. The fair value of the warrants issued to the Lender was calculated utilizing the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model incorporates various and highly sensitive assumptions including expected volatility,

expected term and risk-free interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period. The risk-free interest rate for period within the contractual life of the warrant is based on the U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant. We will amortize the relative fair value of the warrants at the issuance date as a discount of $0.8 million over the term of the loan using the effective interest method, with an effective interest rate of 14.95%. The Term Loan is collateralized by a security interest in substantially all of the Company’s existing and after-acquired assets, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the Loan Agreement and excluding its intellectual property assets, which are subject to a negative pledge.

6.	Revenue Recognition

Concentration of Significant Customers

~~One distributor~~

Two distributors and ~~one~~two direct ~~customer~~customers comprised ~~68%~~76% of our revenue recognized for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. Two ~~direct customers~~distributors and one ~~distributor~~direct customer accounted for ~~68%~~75% of total outstanding accounts receivable (excluding receivables from U.S. Department ~~of Health~~ and Human Service’s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA)) as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

~~Three~~

Two distributors and three direct customers comprised 68% of our revenue recognized for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015. Two direct customers accounted for 73% of total outstanding accounts receivable as of ~~December 31,~~June 30, 2015.

Product revenues, classified by geographic location, are as follows:

	Three months ended										Six months ended
	June 30, 2016					June 30, 2015					June 30, 2016					June 30, 2015
	Product Revenues		% of Total			Product Revenues		% of Total			Product Revenues		% of Total			Product Revenues		% of Total
Americas	$	356,000		31	%	$	272,000		17	%	$	591,000		24	%	$	477,000		19	%
Japan		690,000		61	%		352,000		22	%		1,657,000		67	%		957,000		38	%
EMEA		74,000		7	%		328,000		20	%		205,000		8	%		416,000		17	%
Asia Pacific		6,000		1	%		662,000		41	%		6,000		1	%		666,000		26	%
Total product revenues	$	1,126,000		100	%	$	1,614,000		100	%	$	2,459,000		100	%	$	2,516,000		100	%

Three months ended

March 31, 2016 March 31, 2015

Product
Revenues

% of
Total

Product
Revenues

% of
Total

Americas $ 235,000 18 % $ 201,000 22 %
Japan 966,000 72 % 605,000 67 %
EMEA 132,000 10 % 92,000 10 %
Asia Pacific — 0 % 4,000 1 %
Total product revenues $ 1,333,000 100 % $ 902,000 100 %

Research and Development

We earn revenue for performing tasks under research and development agreements with governmental agencies like the ~~BARDA.~~Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”). Revenues derived from reimbursement of direct out-of-pocket expenses for research costs associated with government contracts are recorded as government contract and other within development revenues. Government contract revenue is recorded at the gross amount of the reimbursement. The costs associated with these reimbursements are reflected as a component of research and development expense in our statements of operations. We recognized ~~$1.6~~$1.7 million and $3.3 million in BARDA revenue for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, respectively, as compared to ~~$1.4~~$1.8 million and $3.3 million for the three and six months ended ~~March 31, 2015.~~

June 30, 2015, respectively.

7.	Inventories

Inventories are carried at the lower of cost or market, determined on the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method.

Inventories consisted of the following:

	June 30, 2016		December 31, 2015
Raw materials	$	972,000	$	1,009,000
Work in process		1,205,000		816,000
Finished goods		2,357,000		2,473,000
	$	4,534,000	$	4,298,000

March 31,
2016

December 31,
2015

Raw materials $ 981,000 $ 1,009,000
Work in process 1,189,000 816,000
Finished goods 2,292,000 2,473,000
$ 4,462,000 $ 4,298,000

~~Index~~

8.	~~Loss~~ Earnings per Share

Basic per share data is computed by dividing net income or loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted per share data is computed by dividing net income or loss applicable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period increased to include, if dilutive, the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding as calculated using the

treasury stock method. Potential common shares were related entirely to outstanding but unexercised options and warrants for all periods presented.

We have excluded all potentially dilutive securities, including unvested performance-based restricted stock, from the calculation of diluted loss per share attributable to common stockholders for the three ~~months~~and six month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and six month period ended June 30, 2015, as their inclusion would be antidilutive. We have included 0.6 million dilutive securities for the purposes of calculating earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2015. Potentially dilutive common shares excluded from the calculations of diluted loss per share were ~~1.1~~4.4 million for the ~~three months~~six month periods ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and ~~2.7~~3.7 million for the ~~three months~~six month period ended ~~March 31, 2015.~~June 30, 2015, respectively.

The following securities that could potentially decrease net loss per share in the future are not included in the determination of diluted loss per share as they are anti-dilutive:

	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Outstanding stock options		803,507		528,429		803,507		570,214
Outstanding warrants		3,571,765		2,542,255		3,571,765		3,058,868
Restricted stock		17,960		41,677		17,960		41,677

9.	Commitments and Contingencies

We have entered into agreements with various research organizations for pre-clinical and clinical development studies, which have provisions for cancellation. Under the terms of these agreements, the vendors provide a variety of services including conducting research, recruiting and enrolling patients, monitoring studies and data analysis. Payments under these agreements typically include fees for services and reimbursement of expenses. The timing of payments due under these agreements is estimated based on current study progress. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we have clinical research study obligations of ~~$5.1~~$4.8 million ~~$4.2~~($3.8 million of which are expected to be complete within a ~~year.~~year). Should the timing of the clinical trials change, the timing of the payment of these obligations would also change.

We ~~have entered into several~~ lease ~~agreements~~facilities for our headquarters office location as well as international office locations. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we have remaining lease obligations of $~~3.6~~3.1 million ($2.3 million of which are expected to be completed within a ~~year.~~

year).

We ~~have entered into minimum purchase~~are party to an agreement with Roche Diagnostics ~~Corporation.~~Corporation which requires us to make certain product purchase minimums. Pursuant to the agreement, as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we have a minimum purchase obligation of ~~$6.0~~$5.9 million, ~~$1.2~~$1.3 million of which is expected to be completed within a year.

We are subject to various claims and contingencies related to legal proceedings. Due to their nature, such legal proceedings involve inherent uncertainties including, but not limited to, court rulings, negotiations between affected parties and governmental actions. Management assesses the probability of loss for such contingencies and accrues a liability and/or discloses the relevant circumstances, as appropriate. Management believes that any liability to us that may arise as a result of currently pending legal proceedings will not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, liquidity, or results of operations as a whole.

~~Refer to note~~

See Note 4 for a discussion of our commitments and contingencies related to our transactions with ~~Olympus Corporation.~~

Olympus.

10.	Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurements are market-based measurements, not entity-specific measurements. Therefore, fair value measurements are determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. We follow a three-level hierarchy to prioritize the inputs used in the valuation techniques to derive fair values. The basis for fair value measurements for each level within the hierarchy is described below:

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.

· ~~Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.~~

Level 3: Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable in active markets.

· Level 2: Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable in active markets.

· ~~Level 3: Valuations derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs are unobservable in active markets.~~

As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and as of December 31, 2015, the Company did not have any assets or liabilities measured at fair ~~value.~~

value presented on the Company’s balance sheets.

Warrants with exercise price reset features (down-round protection) were accounted for as liabilities, with changes in the fair value included in net loss for the respective periods. Because some of the inputs to our valuation model were either not observable or were not derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means, the warrant liability was classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. All of these warrants were cashless exercised on or before December 31, 2015.

~~Index~~

11.	Fair Value

Financial Instruments

We disclose fair value information about all financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. The disclosures of estimated fair value of financial instruments at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, were determined using available market information and appropriate valuation methods. Considerable judgment is necessary to interpret market data and develop estimated fair value. The use of different market assumptions or estimation methods may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, inventories, other current assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses and other liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

We utilize quoted market prices to estimate the fair value of our fixed rate debt, when available. If quoted market prices are not available, we calculate the fair value of our fixed rate debt based on a currently available market rate assuming the loans are outstanding through maturity and considering the collateral. In determining the current market rate for fixed rate debt, a market spread is added to the quoted yields on federal government treasury securities with similar terms to the debt.

At ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the aggregate fair value and the carrying value of the Company’s ~~fixed rate~~ long-term debt were as follows:

	June 30, 2016				December 31, 2015
	Fair Value		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Carrying Value
Long-term debt	$	17,187,000	$	17,157,000	$	16,844,000	$	16,681,000

March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015

Fair Value Carrying Value Fair Value Carrying Value

Fixed rate long-term debt $ 16,988,000 $ 16,919,000 $ 16,844,000 $ 16,681,000

Carrying value is net of debt discount ~~and capitalized loan fees~~ of ~~$1.9~~$1.6 million and $2.1 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

The fair value of debt is classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy as some of the inputs to our valuation model are either not observable quoted prices or are not derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

12.	Stockholders’ Equity

Preferred Stock

We have authorized 5 million shares of $0.001 par value preferred stock. Our Board of Directors is authorized to designate the terms and conditions of any preferred stock we issue without further action by the common stockholders. There were 13,500 shares of Series A 3.6% Convertible Preferred Stock that had been issued at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, none of which were outstanding as of either date.

All outstanding shares of the Series A 3.6% Convertible Preferred Stock were converted into common stock during the fourth quarter of 2014 and the first quarter of 2015 at the option of the holders. The fair value of the common stock into which the Series A 3.6% Convertible Preferred Stock was convertible on the date of issuance exceeded the proceeds allocated to the preferred stock, resulting in the beneficial conversion feature that we recognized as a dividend to the preferred ~~shareholders~~stockholders and, accordingly, an adjustment to net loss to arrive at net loss allocable to common ~~shareholders.~~stockholders. Certain shares of Series A 3.6% Convertible Preferred Stock were not convertible until ~~shareholder~~stockholder approval, which occurred in January 2015. As a result, a dividend for the beneficial conversion feature of $0.7 million was recorded during the quarter ended March 31, 2015.

In connection with the 3.6% Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding at December 31, 2014, we declared a cash dividend of $0.08 million. The cash dividend was paid in January and April 2015.

Common Stock

In May 2015, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain institutional investors pursuant to which the Company agreed to sell up to $25 million of units, with each unit consisting of one share of its common stock and one warrant to purchase one share of its common stock, in a registered direct offering. The purchase and sale of the units took place

in two separate closings. At the initial closing, which took place on May 8, 2015, the Company received approximately $17.4 million in net proceeds from the sale of units. The second closing of the purchase and sale of the units occurred on August 27, 2015 upon satisfaction of certain conditions, including, without limitation, stockholder vote, and the Company received approximately $2.1 million in net proceeds from the sale of 500,000 units of the 1,000,000 units available for sale at the second closing.

~~Index~~

On December 17, 2015, the Company and the holders of October 2014 warrants agreed to amend the October 2014 Warrants pursuant to an Amendment to Common Stock Purchase Warrant (the “2014 Amendment”). Also on December 17, 2015, the Company and the holders of the May 2015 Warrants and the August 2015 Warrants (collectively the “2015 Warrants”) agreed to amend the 2015 Warrants pursuant to an Amendment to Series A-1 Warrant to Purchase Common Stock and Amendment to Series A-2 Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, respectively (the “2015 Amendment” and, together with the 2014 Amendment, the “Warrant Amendments”). The Warrant Amendments provide that the holders may exercise their warrants on a “cashless exercise” basis in whole on or prior to December 31, 2015, whereby each exercising holder of the amended 2015 Warrants would receive 0.75 shares for each warrants share exercised and each exercising holder of the amended 2014 Warrants would receive 0.69 shares for each warrant share exercised. In addition, the Warrant Amendments removed certain provisions which provided that the exercise price of the Warrants would be reset in the event of certain equity issuances by the Company for a price below the exercise price of the Warrants as of the time of such issuance. All 2014 Warrants and all 2015 Warrants were cashless exercised on or before December 31, 2015.

~~13.~~

~~Subsequent Events~~

~~On April 6,~~

From January 1, 2016 ~~the Company filed a Registration Statement on Form S-1 registering non-transferable subscription rights to purchase up to $10,000,000 of units to be distributed at no charge to the holders~~and through June 30, 2016, we sold 766,382 shares of our common stock under an at-the-market offering program (“ATM”), receiving total net proceeds of approximately $2.7 million.

Pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1, originally filed on April 6, 2016, as amended (the “Registration Statement”), and declared effective by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on May 26, 2016, and related prospectus (as supplemented), the Company registered, offered and sold to its participating stockholders of record as of the announced May 20, 2016 record date, one non-transferable subscription right for each share of common stock held by each stockholder as of the record ~~date. The rights provide~~date (the “Rights Offering”). Each right entitled the ~~holders~~holder thereof to purchase one unit at the ~~option to subscribe for units, with each~~subscription price of $2.55 per unit, ~~consisting~~composed of one share of common stock and ~~a fraction~~0.5 of a warrant, ~~(with~~with each whole warrant ~~representing the right~~exercisable to purchase one share of common ~~stock). The record~~stock at an exercise price of $3.06 per share for 30 months from the date ~~and pricing terms~~ of issuance. Pursuant to the ~~rights offering have not yet been determined. There is no guarantee that the rights offering will be consummated, or if it is consummated that it will raise sufficient capital to enable~~Rights Offering, which closed on June 15, 2016, the Company sold an aggregate of 6,704,852 units, resulting in total net proceeds to ~~continue~~the Company of $15.3 million, respectively. The warrants issued pursuant to ~~execute its business strategy as~~the Rights Offering are currently ~~contemplated. See “Risk Factors” below~~listed on NASDAQ under the symbol “CTYXW.” The warrants may be redeemed by the Company at $0.01 per warrant prior to their expiration if the Company’s common stock closes above $7.65 per share for ~~more information.~~

10 consecutive trading days.

11Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis o

~~Index~~

~~Item 2.~~

~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~

f Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Our Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A) includes the following sections:

Overview that discusses our operating results and some of the trends that affect our business.

Results of Operations that includes a more detailed discussion of our revenue and expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources which discusses key aspects of our statements of cash flows, changes in our financial position and our financial commitments.

Significant changes since our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K in the Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates that we believe are important to understanding the assumptions and judgments underlying our financial statements.

You should read this MD&A in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes in Item 1 and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains certain statements that may be deemed “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of U.S. securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, that address activities, events or developments that we intend, expect, project, believe or anticipate and similar expressions or future conditional verbs such as will, should, would, could or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Such statements are based upon certain assumptions and assessments made by our management in light of their experience and their perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors they believe to be appropriate.

These statements include, without limitation, statements about our anticipated expenditures, including ~~those related to clinical~~ research ~~studies~~and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses; the potential size of the market for our ~~products,~~products; future development and/or expansion of our products and therapies in our markets, our ability to generate product or development revenues orand the sources of such revenues; our ability to effectively manage our gross profit margins; our ability to obtain regulatory ~~clearance;~~approvals; expectations as to our future performance; portions of the “Liquidity and Capital Resources” section of this report, including our potential need for additional financing and the availability thereof; our ability to continue as a going concern; our ability to repay or refinance some or all of our outstanding indebtedness and our ability to raise capital in the future; and the potential enhancement of our cash position through development, marketing, and licensing arrangements. Our actual results will likely differ, perhaps materially, from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including: the early stage of our product candidates and therapies, the results of our research and development activities, including uncertainties relating to the clinical trials of our product candidates and therapies; our need and ability to raise additional cash, the outcome of our ~~joint ventures,~~partnering/licensing efforts, risks associated with laws or regulatory requirements applicable to us, market conditions, product performance, potential litigation, and competition within the regenerative medicine field, to name a few. The forward-looking statements included in this report are subject to a number of additional material risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to the risks described under the “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of Part I below, which we encourage you to read carefully.

We encourage you to read the risks described under “Risk Factors” carefully. We caution you not to place undue reliance on the forward-looking statements contained in this report. These statements, like all statements in this report, speak only as of the date of this report (unless an earlier date is indicated) and we undertake no obligation to update or revise the statements except as required by law. Such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results will likely differ, perhaps materially, from those suggested by such forward-looking statements.

This Quarterly report on Form 10-Q refers to trademarks such as Cytori Cell Therapy, Celution and StemSource. Solely for convenience, our trademarks and tradenames referred to in this Form 10-Q may appear without the ^® or ™ symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate in any way that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights to these trademarks and tradenames.

General

We develop cellular therapeutics uniquely formulated and optimized for specific diseases and medical conditions and related products. Our lead therapeutics are currently targeted for impaired hand function in scleroderma, osteoarthritis of the knee, stress urinary incontinence, and deep thermal burns including those complicated by radiation exposure.

~~Index~~

Our cellular therapeutics are collectively known by the trademarked name, Cytori Cell Therapy, and consist of a mixed population of specialized cells including stem cells that are involved in response to injury, repair and healing. These cellular therapeutics are extracted from an adult patient’s own adipose (fat) tissue using our fully automated Celution System, which includes a device, proprietary enzymes, and sterile consumable sets utilized at the ~~place where the patient is receiving their care~~point-of-therapeutic application or potentially at an off-site processing center. Cytori Cell Therapy can either be administered to the patient the same day or cryopreserved for future use. An independent published study has reported that our proprietary technology process resulted in higher nucleated cell viability, less residual enzyme activity, less processing time, and improved economics in terms of cell progenitor output compared to the three other semi-automated and automated processes that were reviewed.

Our primary near-term goal is for Cytori Cell Therapy to be the first cell therapy to market for the treatment of impaired hand function in scleroderma, through Cytori-sponsored and supported clinical development efforts. The STAR trial is a 48-week, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled phase III pivotal clinical trial of 80 patients in the U.S. The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of a single administration of Cytori Cell Therapy, or ECCS-50, in scleroderma patients affecting the hands and fingers. The first sites for the scleroderma study were initiated in July ~~2015. Over~~ 75%2015 and completed enrollment of 88 patients ~~have been enrolled~~ in ~~the STAR study.~~June 2016. We anticipate that ~~the target enrollment of 80 patients~~we will ~~be achieved by~~ ~~mid-June~~ ~~of 2016.~~

receive 48-week follow-up data on this phase III pivotal clinical trial in mid-2017.

With respect to the remainder of our clinical pipeline, we received Investigational Device Exemption, or IDE, approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, in late 2014 for our phase II ACT-OA osteoarthritis study and in early 2015 we initiated this study, and enrollment was completed in June 2015. ~~Data~~The 48-week analysis ofwas performed as planned and the ~~48-week~~top-line data ~~will be available during~~are described in the ~~third quarter of 2016.~~“Osteoarthritis” section below. In July 2015, a Company-supported male stress urinary incontinence, or SUI, trial in Japan for male prostatectomy patients (after prostate surgery) received approval to begin enrollment from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare, or MHLW. The goal of this investigator-initiated trial is to gain regulatory approval in Japan of Cytori Cell Therapy for this indication. We are also developing a treatment for thermal burns combined with radiation injury under a contract from the Biomedical Advanced Research Development Authority, or BARDA, a division of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. We are also exploring other development opportunities in a variety of other conditions.

In addition to our targeted therapeutic development, we have continued to commercialize ~~the~~our Cytori ~~cell therapy~~Cell Therapy technology under select medical device approvals, clearances and registrations to research and commercial customers in Europe, Japan and other regions. Many of these customers are research customers evaluating new therapeutic applications of Cytori Cell Therapy. The sale of systems, consumables and ancillary products contributes a margin that partially offsets our operating expenses and will continue to play a role in fostering familiarity within the medical community with our technology. These sales have also facilitated the discovery of new applications for Cytori Cell Therapy by customers conducting investigator-initiated and funded research.

Lead Indication: Scleroderma

Scleroderma is a rare and chronic autoimmune disorder associated with fibrosis of the skin, and destructive changes in blood vessels and multiple organ systems as the result of a generalized overproduction of collagen. Scleroderma affects approximately 50,000 patients in the U.S. (women are affected four times more frequently than men) and is typically detected between the ages of 30 and 50. More than 90 percent of scleroderma patients have hand involvement that is typically progressive and can result in chronic pain, blood flow changes and severe dysfunction. The limited availability of treatments for scleroderma may provide some benefit but do little to modify disease progression or substantially improve symptoms. Treatment options are directed at protecting the hands from injury and detrimental environmental conditions as well as the use of vasodilators. When the disease is advanced, immunosuppressive and other medications may be used but are often accompanied by significant side effects.

In January 2015, the FDA granted unrestricted IDE approval for a pivotal clinical trial, named the “STAR” trial, to evaluate Cytori Cell Therapy as a potential treatment for impaired hand function in scleroderma. The STAR trial is a 48-week, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled pivotal clinical trial of 80 patients in the U.S. The trial evaluates the safety and efficacy of a single administration of ECCS-50 in patients with scleroderma ~~patients~~ affecting the hands and fingers. The STAR trial uses the Cochin Hand Function Scale, or CHFS, a validated measure of hand function, as the primary endpoint measured at six months after a single administration of ECCS-50 or placebo. Patients in the placebo group will be eligible for crossover to the active arm of the trial after all patients have completed 48 weeks of follow up. In February 2015, the FDA approved our request to increase the number of investigational sites from 12 to up to 20. The increased number of sites ~~is anticipated~~served to broaden the geographic coverage of the trial and facilitate trial enrollment. The enrollment of this trial began in August 2015 and ~~we recently reported~~was completed at 88 patients in June 2016. We anticipate that we ~~enrolled the 60~~^th ~~patient and expect to complete enrollment of~~will receive 48-week follow-up data on this phase III pivotal clinical trial in ~~mid-June, 2016.~~

~~Index~~

mid-2017.

The STAR trial is predicated on a completed investigator-initiated pilot phase I/II trial performed in France termed SCLERADEC I. The SCLERADEC I trial received partial support from Cytori. The results were published in the Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases in May 2014 and ~~demonstrate~~demonstrated approximately a 50 percent improvement at six months across four important and validated endpoints used to assess the clinical status in patients with scleroderma with impaired hand function. Patients perceived their health status to be improved as shown by a 45.2% and 42.4% decrease of the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire, or

SHAQ, at month 2 (p=0.001) and at month 6 (p=0.001), respectively. A 47% and 56% decrease of the CHFS at month 2 and month 6 in comparison to baseline was observed (p<0.001 for both). Grip strength increased at month 6 with a mean improvement of +4.8±6.4 kg for the dominant hand (p=0.033) and +4.0±3.5 kg for the non-dominant hand (p=0.002). Similarly, an increase in pinch strength at month 6 was noted with a mean improvement of +1.0±1.1 kg for the dominant hand (p=0.009) and +0.8±1.2 kg for the non-dominant hand (p=0.050). Among subjects having at least one digital ulcer, ~~(DU)~~or DU, at inclusion, total number of DU decreased, from 15 DUs at baseline, 10 at month 2 and 7 at month 6. The average reduction of the Raynaud’s Condition Score from baseline was 53.7% at month 2 (p<0.001) and 67.5% at month 6 (p<0.001). Hand pain showed a significant decrease of 63.6% at month 2 (p=0.001) and 70% at month 6 (p<0.001). One year results were ~~recently~~ published in September 2015 in the journal Rheumatology. Relative to baseline, the CHFS and the SHAQ improved by 51.3% and 46.8% respectively (p<0.001 for both). The Raynaud’s score improved by 63.2% from baseline (p<0.001). Other findings ~~include~~at one-year included a 30.5% improvement in grip strength (p=0.002) and a 34.5% improvement in hand pain (p=0.052). In February 2016, two-year follow up data in the SCLERADEC I trial was presented at the Systemic Sclerosis World Congress, which demonstrated sustained improvement in the following four key endpoints: Cochin Hand Function Score (CHFS), Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire, Raynaud’s Condition Score (which assesses severity of Raynaud’s Phenomenon), and hand pain, as assessed by a standard visual analogue scale. The major findings at 24 months following a single administration of ~~Cytori Cell Therapy (ECCS-50)~~ECCS-50 were as follows:

Hand dysfunction assessed by the CHFS, showed a 62% reduction in hand dysfunction at two years (p<0.001).

Raynaud’s Condition Score decreased by an average of 89% over baseline at two years (p<0.001).

Hand pain, as measured by a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale, and the Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ) score at two years both showed improvement of 50% over baseline (p=0.01 and p<0.001 respectively).

Improvement of 20% in grip strength and 330% in pinch strength at two years (p=0.05 and p=0.004 respectively).

Continued reduction in the number of ulcers from 15 at baseline to 9 at one year and 6 at two years.

In 2014, Drs. Guy Magalon and Brigitte Granel, under the sponsorship of the Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Marseille, submitted a study for review for a follow-up phase III randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in France using Cytori Cell Therapy, to be supported by Cytori. The trial name is SCLERADEC II and was approved by the French government in April 2015. Enrollment of this trial commenced in October 2015. Patients will be followed for 6 months post-procedure.

In January 2016, we entered into an agreement with Idis Managed Access, part of Clinigen Group plc, or Idis, to establish a managed access program, or MAP, in select countries across Europe, the Middle East and Africa, or EMEA, for patients with impaired hand function due to scleroderma. We established this MAP, also known as ~~a “compassionate use,”~~an “early access” or “named patient” program, to make our ECCS-50 therapy available to patients in advance of obtaining regulatory clearance. We believe this MAP ~~program~~ is justified and needed based on a number of factors, including scleroderma’s status as a rare disease, the favorable risk-benefit profile reported by the 12-patient, open-label SCLERADEC I clinical study results, our two scleroderma phase III trials currently enrolling, and clear unmet scleroderma patient needs. We hope to offer our ECCS-50 therapy to patients who are unable to participate in our scleroderma clinical trials, generally due to a lack of geographic proximity to a site. Beyond the benefit of helping patients in need of new therapies for scleroderma, the MAP will increase awareness of and facilitate a positive experience with Cytori Cell Therapy among healthcare providers in advance of commercialization, ~~and~~ will ~~also~~ allow for tracking and collection of key program data and documentation which will provide valuable insight regarding the demand for and use of Cytori Cell ~~Therapy.~~

Therapy, and will provide us with pricing insight for our ECCS-50 therapy.

In April ~~2015,~~2016, the European Commission, acting on the positive recommendation from the European Medicines Agency Committee for Orphan Medicinal Products, issued orphan drug designation to ~~autologous adipose derived stromal vascular cells (ECCS-50) processed~~a broad range of Cytori Cell Therapy formulations when used for the treatment of hand dysfunction and Raynaud’s Phenomenon in patients with ~~the Celution System for systemic sclerosis. This designation marks the first autologous adipose derived cell therapy to be designated orphan drug status in Europe for scleroderma.~~

scleroderma under Community Register of Orphan Medicinal Products number EU/3/16/1643.

Osteoarthritis

Osteoarthritis is a disease of the entire joint involving the cartilage, joint lining, ligaments and underlying bone. The breakdown of tissue leads to pain, joint stiffness and reduced function. It is the most common form of arthritis and affects an estimated 13.9% of US adults over the age of 25, and 33.6% of USU.S. adults over the age of 65. Current treatments include physical therapy, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medications, viscosupplement injections, and total knee replacement. A substantial medical need exists as present medications have limited efficacy and joint replacement is a relatively definitive treatment for those with the most advanced disease.

~~Index~~

In the later part of 2014, we received approval by the FDA to begin an exploratory U.S. IDE pilot (phase IIa/b) trial of Cytori Cell Therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. The trial, called ACT-OA, is a 94-patient, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled study involving two doses of Cytori Cell Therapy, a low dose and a high dose, and ~~will be~~was conducted over 48 weeks. The randomization is 1:1:1 between the control, low and high dose groups. Enrollment on this trial began in February 2015 and was

completed in June 2015. The goal of this proof-of-concept trial is to help determine: (1) safety and feasibility of the ECCO-50 therapeutic for osteoarthritis, (2) provide dosing guidance and (3) explore key trial endpoints useful for a phase III trial.

~~A pre-specified partial unblinding and top-line~~

Top-line analysis of ~~24-week~~the final 48-week data ~~was~~has recently been completed. The primary objective of ~~the analysis~~this prospective, randomized, placebo controlled study was to ~~provide early~~evaluate the safety and feasibility of intraarticular injection of Celution prepared adipose-derived regenerative cells injected into knees of patients with chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis. A total of 94 patients were randomized (33 placebo, 30 low dose ECCS-50, 31 high dose ECCS-50). In general, a clear difference between low and high dose ECCS-50 was not observed and therefore the data ~~to facilitate key regulatory and business development discussions and provide better understanding of the therapeutic mechanism of action~~for both groups have been combined. Numerous endpoints were evaluated that ~~may impact other clinical programs. The interim top-line data shows the following:~~

can be summarized as follows:

~~The randomization is relatively balanced among the three treatment groups; low dose, high dose, and placebo.~~

~~Intra-articular~~

Intraarticular application of a single dose of ECCO-50 ~~appears to be safe and~~is feasible in an outpatient day-surgery ~~setting. No complications occurred~~setting; no serious adverse events were reported related to the fat harvest, cell ~~processing~~injection or to the cell ~~delivery.~~therapy.

~~A significant~~

Consistent trends observed in most secondary endpoints at 12, 24 and 48 weeks in the target knee of the treated group relative to placebo ~~response was observed, similar to that demonstrated in other OA trials.~~control group; 12 week primary endpoint of single pain on walking question did not achieve statistical significance.

The pre-specified primary endpoint, pain on walking at 12 weeks, as measured by a single question from the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, or KOOS, did not obtain statistical significance.

Key secondary endpoints include the total and sub-scores of the KOOS, patient self-assessments (knee pain, knee stability, osteoarthritis activity and osteoarthritis damage), use of as-needed pain medication, pain while walking 50 feet and health status as measured by the SF-36.

Consistent trends ~~were~~ observed in all 6 pre-specified MRI Osteoarthritis Knee Score (MOAKS) classification scores suggesting ~~improvement~~decrease in target knee joint pathologic features at 48 weeks for the ~~cell~~ treated group relative to ~~the~~ placebo ~~group at the 12 and 24-week time periods for patient reported outcomes; however, in general, between-group differences were small.~~control group.

~~Both high doses and low doses of ECCO-50 performed similarly.~~

In summary, the ~~third quarter~~ACT-OA phase II trial demonstrated feasibility of ~~2016, following full unblinding~~same day fat harvesting, cell processing and intraarticular administration of autologous ADRCs (ECCS-50) with a potential for a cell benefit effect. Additional analyses are ongoing. The accumulated data and experienced gained will be critical in considering designs of further clinical trials in osteoarthritis and other potential indications. As well, the multicenter nature of the ~~48-week data, we expect~~trial in the United States provides relevant information as to be able to fully evaluate the data including 48-week follow-up, patient subset analyses, and the effect on knee cartilage as measured by magnetic resonance imaging results changes between baseline and 48 weeks.

optimizing commercialization.

Stress Urinary Incontinence

Another therapeutic target under evaluation by Cytori in combination with the University of Nagoya and the Japanese MHLW is stress urinary incontinence in men following surgical removal of the prostate gland, which is based on positive data reported in a peer reviewed journal resulting from the use of adipose-derived regenerative cells processed by our Celution System. The ADRESU trial is a 45 patient, open-label, multi-center, and single arm trial that was approved by Japan’s MHLW in July 2015 and is being led by both Momokazu Gotoh, MD, Ph.D., Professor and Chairman of the Department of Urology and Tokunori Yamamoto, MD, Ph.D., Associate Professor Department of Urology at University of Nagoya Graduate School of Medicine. The goal of this investigator-initiated trial will be to apply for product approval for Cytori Cell Therapy technology for this indication. This clinical trial is primarily sponsored and funded by the Japanese government. Enrollment of this trial began in September 2015.

Cutaneous and Soft Tissue Thermal and Radiation Injuries

Cytori Cell Therapy is also being developed for the treatment of thermal burns combined with radiation injury. In the third quarter of 2012, we were awarded a contract valued at up to $106 million with BARDA to develop a medical countermeasure for thermal burns. The initial base period included $4.7 million over two years and covered preclinical research and continued development of Cytori’s Celution System to improve cell processing.

In 2014, an In-Process Review Meeting was held at which Cytori confirmed completion of the objectives of the initial phase of the contract. In August 2014, BARDA exercised contract option 1 in the amount of approximately $12 million. In December 2014, this was supplemented with an additional $2 million. This funded continuation of research, regulatory, clinical and other activities required for submission of an Investigational Device Exemption, or IDE, request to the FDA for a pilot clinical trial using Cytori Cell Therapy (DCCT-10) for the treatment of thermal burns. Upon receipt of IDE approval to execute this pilot clinical trial, we anticipate that BARDA will provide funding to cover costs associated with execution of the clinical trial and related activities, currently estimated at approximately $8.3 million.

Our contract with BARDA contains two additional options to fund a pivotal clinical trial and additional preclinical work in thermal burn complicated by radiation exposure. These options are valued at up to $45 million and $23 million, respectively.

The total award under the BARDA contract is intended to support all clinical, preclinical, regulatory and technology development activities needed to complete the FDA approval process for use of Cytori Cell Therapy, or DCCT-10, in thermal burn injury under a device-based PMA regulatory pathway and to provide preclinical data in burn complicated by radiation exposure.

Other Clinical Indications

Heart failure due to ischemic heart disease does not represent a current clinical target for ~~the Company.~~us. Our ATHENA and ATHENA II trials related to that indication were truncated and we have minimized expenses related to initiatives in this area. While we may use the data from these trial programs for regulatory support for our other indications and also for publication in peer reviewed forums,~~, the Company is~~ we are not actively pursuing indications related to these trials. The 12 month results of the ATHENA Trials were presented by the investigators at the Society of Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Annual Scientific Meeting on May 5, 2016 and data has been published on the Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions journal in June 2016.

~~Index~~

Results of Operations

Product revenues

Product revenues consisted of revenues primarily from the sale of Cytori ~~cell therapy related~~Cell Therapy-related products.

The following table summarizes the components for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015:

For the three months ended

June 30,

For the six months ended

June 30,

2016

2015

2016

2015

Product revenues - third party

1,126,000

1,614,000

2,459,000

2,516,000

For the three months
ended March 31,

2016 2015

Product revenues - third party $ 1,333,000 $ 902,000

We experienced ~~an increase~~a decrease of $0.5 million in product revenue during the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015, due to decreased revenue in Asia Pacific of $0.6 million, primarily due to the opening order from Lorem Vascular in the second quarter of 2015 and lack of ongoing orders, decreased revenue in EMEA of $0.3 million, primarily due to non-recurring revenue generated from the sale of raw materials used to manufacture the divested Puregraft product in the second quarter of 2015, offset by increased ~~revenue~~revenues in Japan of ~~$0.4 million.~~

$0.3 million due to continued adoption of Cytori Cell Therapy primarily in the aesthetic business. We experienced a decrease of $0.1 million in product revenue during the six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015, due to decreased revenues in Asia Pacific of $0.6 million and EMEA of $0.2 million, offset by increased revenues in Japan of $0.7 million for the same matters outlined above.

The future: We expect to continue to generate a majority of product revenues from the sale of Cytori ~~cell therapy related~~Cell Therapy-related products to researchers, clinicians, and distributors in EMEA, Japan, Asia Pacific, and the Americas. In Japan and EMEA, researchers will use our technology in ongoing and new investigator-initiated and funded studies focused on, but not limited to, hand scleroderma, Crohn’s disease, peripheral artery disease, erectile dysfunction, and diabetic foot ~~ulcer.~~ulcers. ECCS-50 therapy for hand scleroderma will be accessible to patients and physicians through a managed access program, or ~~named patient program,~~MAP, that we initiated in EMEA in 2016. In the America’s, Cytori’s partner, Kerastem, ~~will utilize~~is utilizing the Cytori ~~cell therapy~~Cell Therapy technology as part of its FDA-approved STYLE trial for patients with alopecia, or hair loss.Overall, we expect 2016 product revenues for the full year to grow modestly as compared to 2015.

Cost of product revenues

Cost of product revenues relate primarily to Cytori ~~cell therapy related~~Cell Therapy-related products and includes material, manufacturing labor, and overhead costs. The following table summarizes the components of our cost of revenues for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015:

	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Cost of product revenues	$	576,000		$	1,276,000		$	1,127,000		$	1,855,000
Share-based compensation		9,000			20,000			25,000			39,000
Total cost of product revenues	$	585,000		$	1,296,000		$	1,152,000		$	1,894,000
Total cost of product revenues as % of product revenues		52.0	%		80.3	%		46.8	%		75.3	%

For the three months ended March 31,

2016 2015

Cost of product revenues $ 551,000 $ 579,000
Share-based compensation 16,000 19,000
Total cost of product revenues $ 567,000 $ 598,000
Total cost of product revenues as % of product revenues 43 % 66 %

Cost of product revenues as a percentage of product revenues was ~~43%~~52.0% and 46.8% for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and ~~66%~~80.3% and 75.3% for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, respectively. Fluctuation in this percentage is due to the product mix, distributor and direct sales mix, geographic mix and allocation of overhead.

The ~~future~~:future: We expect to continue to see variation in our gross profit margin as the product mix, distributor and direct sales mix and geographic mix comprising revenues fluctuate. In addition, in 2016, as part of our EMEA managed access program we anticipate

the ability to command a premium price for ECCS-50 for the treatment of hand impairment due to scleroderma, a rare (or orphan) disease, which may increase our gross profit margin.

~~Index~~

Development revenues

Under our government contract with BARDA, we recognized a total of ~~$1.6~~$1.7 million and $3.3 million in revenues for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, respectively which included allowable fees as well as cost reimbursements. During the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we incurred ~~$1.5~~$1.6 million and $3.1 million in qualified ~~expenditures.~~expenditures, respectively. We recognized a total of ~~$1.4~~$1.9 million and $3.3 million in revenues for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, respectively which ~~also~~ included allowable fees as well as cost reimbursements. During the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, we incurred ~~$1.3~~$1.7 million and $3.1 million in qualified ~~expenditures.~~expenditures, respectively. The ~~increase~~decrease in revenues for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 as compared to the same ~~period~~periods in 2015 is primarily due to ~~increased~~slight decreases in research and development ~~activities.~~

activities related to BARDA.

The future: In August 2014, BARDA exercised Option 1 of our contract for us to perform research, regulatory, clinical and other tasks required for initiation of a pilot clinical trial of the Cytori Cell Therapy in thermal burn injury (DCCT-10). The contract was amended in December 2014 to reflect amendments to the Statement of Work, and reorganization of the contract options for a total fixed fee of up to $14 million. We expect the work associated with Option 1, as amended, to be completed by the end of 2016 and overall contract revenues to remain materially consistent with 2015.

Research and development expenses

Research and development expenses relate to the development of a technology platform that involves using adipose tissue as a source of autologous regenerative cells for therapeutic applications as well as the continued development efforts related to our ~~Cytori cell therapy technology~~.

clinical trials.

Research and development expenses include costs associated with the design, development, testing and enhancement of our products, payment of regulatory fees, laboratory supplies, pre-clinical studies and clinical studies.

The following table summarizes the components of our research and development expenses for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015:

	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
General research and development	$	5,121,000	$	5,906,000	$	9,113,000	$	9,743,000
Share-based compensation		126,000		142,000		261,000		269,000
Total research and development expenses	$	5,247,000	$	6,048,000	$	9,374,000	$	10,012,000

For the three months ended
March 31,

2016 2015

Research and development $ 3,992,000 $ 3,835,000
Share-based compensation 135,000 128,000
Total research and development expenses $ 4,127,000 $ 3,963,000

The ~~increase~~decrease in research and development expenses ~~of $0.2 million~~ for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 as compared to the same ~~period~~periods in 2015 is due to ~~an increase~~a decrease of approximately ~~$0.2~~$0.7 million in study related expenses as our ACT-OA phase II clinical trial fully enrolled during the second quarter 2015, offset by expenses related to ~~BARDA, an increase~~our STAR phase III clinical trial that fully enrolled during the second quarter of ~~$0.2 million in expenses related to clinical studies, offset by a decrease of $0.2 million in expenses related to professional services.~~

2016.

The future : We expect aggregate research and development expenditures to ~~slightly decrease. We~~decrease in the second half of 2016 as we completed ~~enrollment of~~ the U.S. ACT-OA clinical trial in ~~2015, but continue to sponsor~~2016, and completed enrollment in the U.S. STAR clinical trial ~~a trial for treatment of impaired hand function~~ in scleroderma, and support two physician initiated non-U.S. trials, ADRESU, a Japanese trial for treatment of men with urinary incontinence following radical prostatectomy, and SCLERADEC II, a French trial for the treatment of impaired hand function in scleroderma.

June 2016.

Sales and marketing expenses

Sales and marketing expenses include costs of sales and marketing personnel, events and tradeshows, customer and sales representative education and training, primary and secondary market research, and product and service promotion. The following table summarizes the components of our sales and marketing expenses for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015:

	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Sales and marketing	$	846,000	$	627,000	$	1,832,000	$	1,437,000
Share-based compensation		43,000		27,000		92,000		56,000
Total sales and marketing expenses	$	889,000	$	654,000	$	1,924,000	$	1,493,000

For the three months ended
March 31,

2016 2015

Sales and marketing $ 986,000 $ 810,000
Share-based compensation 49,000 29,000
Total sales and marketing expenses $ 1,035,000 $ 839,000

The increase in sales and marketing expense during the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 as compared to the same ~~period~~periods in 2015 is mainly attributed to the increase in salary and related benefits expense (excluding share-based compensation) of $0.2 million for both periods, as well as increase in professional services expense of $0.2 ~~million.~~

~~Index~~

million for both periods mostly due to investments in the EMEA managed access program and commercial planning activities for scleroderma in the U.S. These increases are offset by immaterial decreases in other activities during the three months ended June 30, 2016, compared to the same period in 2015.

The future: We expect sales and marketing expenditures to stabilize or slightly increase during the second half of 2016, associated with investments in our EMEA managed access program and commercial planning activities for hand scleroderma, knee osteoarthritis and stress urinary incontinence.

General and administrative expenses

General and administrative expenses include costs for administrative personnel, legal and other professional expenses, and general corporate expenses. The following table summarizes the general and administrative expenses for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015:

	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
General and administrative	$	2,178,000	$	2,294,000	$	4,347,000	$	4,510,000
Share-based compensation		150,000		499,000		267,000		782,000
Total general and administrative expenses	$	2,328,000	$	2,793,000	$	4,614,000	$	5,292,000

For the three months ended
March 31,

2016 2015

General and administrative $ 2,169,000 $ 2,216,000
Share-based compensation 117,000 283,000
Total general and administrative expenses $ 2,286,000 $ 2,499,000

The decrease in general and administrative expenses during the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 as compared to the same ~~period~~periods in 2015 is mainly attributed to ~~an incr~~a ~~ease~~decrease in ~~sublease income~~charges incurred for professional services of $0.1 ~~million.~~million and $0.2 million, respectively, consistent with our ongoing cost curtailment efforts.

The future: We expect general and administrative expenditures to remain at current levels or slightly increase throughout 2016.

~~Stock-based~~

Share-based compensation expenses

Stock-based compensation expenses include charges related to options and restricted stock awards issued to employees, directors and non-employees along with charges related to the employee stock purchases under the Employee Stock Purchase Plan, ~~(ESPP).~~or ESPP. We measure stock-based compensation expense based on the grant-date fair value of any awards granted to our employees. Such expense is recognized over the requisite service period.

The following table summarizes the components of our share-based compensation expenses for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015:

	For the three months ended June 30,				For the six months ended June 30,
	2016		2015		2016		2015
Cost of product revenues	$	9,000	$	20,000	$	25,000	$	39,000
Research and development-related		126,000		142,000		261,000		269,000
Sales and marketing-related		43,000		27,000		92,000		56,000
General and administrative-related		150,000		499,000		267,000		782,000
Total share-based compensation	$	328,000	$	688,000	$	645,000	$	1,146,000

For the three months ended
March 31,

2016 2015

Cost of product revenues $ 16,000 $ 19,000
Research and development-related 135,000 128,000
Sales and marketing-related 49,000 29,000
General and administrative-related 117,000 283,000
Total share-based compensation $ 317,000 $ 459,000

The decrease in share-based compensation expenses for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 as compared to the same ~~period~~periods in 2015 is primarily related to a lower annual grant caused by reductions in headcount and due to the decline in the stock price during ~~the first quarter in~~ 2016 as compared to the same ~~period~~periods in 2015, and its corresponding impact into the share-based compensation.

The future: We expect to continue to grant options and stock awards (which will result in an expense) to our employees, directors, and, as appropriate, to non-employee service providers. In addition, previously-granted options will continue to vest in accordance with their original terms. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, the total compensation cost related to non-vested stock options and stock awards not yet recognized for all our plans ~~was~~is approximately ~~$2.2~~$1.7 million which is expected to be recognized as a result of vesting under service conditions over a weighted average period of ~~1.67~~1.65 years.

Change in fair value of warrant liability

The following is a table summarizing the change in fair value of our warrant liability for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015:

For the three months ended

June 30,

For the six months ended

June 30,

2016

2015

2016

2015

Change in fair value of warrant liability

—

(13,122,000

)

—

2,322,000

For the three months
ended March 31,

2016 2015

Change in fair value of warrants $ — $ 15,444,000

~~Index~~

The change in fair value of our warrant liability for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015 is due to the fact that all warrants with price reset features accounted for as liabilities were cashless exercised on or before December, 31, 2015.

The future: We do not expect any further changes in fair value of warrant liability, as all of our outstanding warrants with exercise price reset features were settled during December 2015.

Financing items

The following table summarizes interest income, interest expense, and other income and expense for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015:

	For the three months ended June 30,						For the six months ended June 30,
	2016			2015			2016			2015
Income (loss) on asset disposal	$	—		$	(1,000	)	$	2,000		$	8,000
Loss on debt extinguishment		—			(260,000	)		—			(260,000	)
Interest income		2,000			3,000			4,000			3,000
Interest expense		(645,000	)		(936,000	)		(1,302,000	)		(2,007,000	)
Other income (expense), net		462,000			(148,000	)		874,000			(47,000	)
Total	$	(181,000	)	$	(1,342,000	)	$	(422,000	)	$	(2,303,000	)

For the three months ended
March 31,

2016 2015

Interest income $ 2,000 $ 1,000
Interest expense (657,000 ) (1,072,000 )
Other income, net 413,000 110,000
Total $ (242,000 ) $ (961,000 )

In connection with the May 2015 Loan Agreement, a loss on debt extinguishment was recorded that relate to the payoff of the prior loan obligations.

Interest expense decreased for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 as compared to the same ~~period~~periods in 2015, due to pay down and refinance of principal loan balance in May 2015.

The ~~increase~~changes in other income ~~net~~(expense) during the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 as compared to the same ~~period~~periods in 2015 resulted primarily from changes in exchange rates related to transactions in foreign currency.

The future: We expect interest expense in 2016 to decrease as we refinanced and decreased the principal of our outstanding Term Loan with Oxford Finance, LLC in 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Short-term and long-term liquidity

The following is a summary of our key liquidity measures at ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

	As of June 30,		As of December 31,
	2016		2015
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,042,000	$	14,338,000
Current assets	$	26,750,000	$	21,243,000
Current liabilities		10,079,000		8,437,000
Working capital	$	16,671,000	$	12,806,000

As of March 31,
2016

As of December 31,
2015

Cash and cash equivalents $ 9,358,000 $ 14,338,000

Current assets $ 16,515,000 $ 21,243,000
Current liabilities 9,684,000 8,437,000
Working capital $ 6,831,000 $ 12,806,000

We incurred net losses of ~~$5.3~~$6.4 million and $11.7 million for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, respectively and ~~$22.~~0incurred net income of $4.5 million and net loss of $17.5 million for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2015, respectively. We have an accumulated deficit of ~~$362~~$368.8 million as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016. Additionally, we have used net cash of $5$10.7 million and $9.8 million to fund our operating activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and ~~2015.~~

2015, respectively.

To date, these operating losses have been funded primarily from outside sources of invested capital including our recently completed Rights Offering, our At the Market equity facility, Loan and Security Agreement and gross profits.

~~Index~~

We have had, and we will likely continue to have, an ongoing need to raise additional cash from outside sources to fund our future ~~operations. However, our ability to raise capital was adversely affected~~ ~~once FDA put a hold on our Athena trials in mid-2014, which had an adverse impact to stock price performance~~clinical development programs and ~~our corresponding ability to restructure our debt. More recently, a continued~~other operations.

On June 15, 2016, downward trend in our stock price resulting from general economic and industry conditions as well as the market’s unfavorable view of our recent equity financings (which financings were priced at a discount to market and included 100% warrant coverage) and our Nasdaq listing deficiency, have made it more difficult to procure additional capital on terms reasonably acceptable to us. ~~The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared assuming that~~ the Company ~~will continue as~~closed a ~~going concern.~~ ~~If we are unsuccessful~~Rights Offering originally filed under Form S-1 registration statement in ~~our efforts~~April 2016. Pursuant to ~~raise outside capital~~the Rights Offering, the Company sold an aggregate of 6,704,852 units consisting of a total of 6,704,852 shares of common stock and 3,352,306 warrants, with each warrant exercisable for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.06 per share, resulting in ~~the near term, we will be required~~total gross proceeds to ~~significantly reduce our research, development, and administrative operations, including reduction~~Cytori of ~~our employee base, in order to offset the lack of available funding.~~

We are pursuing financing opportunities in both the private and public debt and equity markets as well as through strategic corporate partnerships. We have an established history of raising capital through these platforms, and we are currently involved in negotiations with multiple parties. Our efforts in 2014 and 2015 to raise capital took longer than we initially anticipated. We expect to continue to utilize our cash and cash equivalents to fund operations at least through September of 2016, subject to minimum cash and cash liquidity requirements of the Loan and Security Agreement with the Lender, which requires that we maintain at least $5 million of cash on hand to avoid an event of default under the Loan and Security Agreement. We continue$17.1 million.

The Company continues to seek additional ~~cash~~capital through product revenues, strategic ~~collaborations,~~transactions, including extension opportunities under the awarded U.S. Department of Health and ~~future sales~~Human Service’s Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (“BARDA”) contract, and from other financing alternatives.

Should we be unable to raise additional cash from outside sources, this will have an adverse impact on our operations.

As of ~~equity or debt securities. Although~~June 30, 2016, there ~~can be~~have been no ~~assurance given, we hope to successfully complete one or more additional financing transactions and corporate partnerships in~~material changes outside the ~~near-term. Without this additional capital, current working capital and cash generated from sales and containment~~ordinary course of operating costs will not provide adequate funding for research, sales and marketing efforts, clinical and preclinical trials, and product development activities at their current levels. If sufficient capital is not raised, we will at a minimum need to significantly reduce or curtail our ~~research and development and other operations, and this could negatively affect our ability to achieve corporate goals.~~

Specifically, we have prepared an operating plan that calls for us to reduce operations to focus almost entirely on one US clinical program and the supply of current products to existing or new distribution channels. In addition, as part of this plan, there would be minimal expenditures for ongoing scientific research, product development or clinical research. This impacts research and development headcount, external subcontractor expenditures, capital outlay and general and administrative expenditures relatedbusiness to the ~~supervision of such activities. In parallel,~~contractual obligations we ~~would significantly reduce administrative staff and salaries consistent with the overall reduction~~reported in ~~scope of operations. In aggregate, such reductions could result in eliminations of roles~~our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the majority of the Company’s current staff and the deferral or elimination of all ongoing development projects until such time that cash resources were available from operations or outside sources to re-establish development and growth plans. Management is currently reviewing contractual obligations related to the pre-clinical and clinical commitments along with minimum purchase requirements to include deferral of such commitments as part of this plan. While management is actively pursuing it’s near term financial and strategic alternatives it is also, in parallel, continuing to evaluate the timing of implementation of the alternative operating plan and the initiation of the identified reductions.

~~The following table summarizes our contractual obligations and other commitments at March~~fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2016, and the effect such obligations could have on our liquidity and cash flow in future periods:~~

Payments due by period
Contractual Obligations Total
Less than 1
year
1 – 3 years 3 – 5 years
More than
5 years

Long-term obligations $ 18,789,000 $ 1,770,000 $ 14,160,000 $ 2,859,000 $ —
Interest commitment on long-term obligations 3,283,000 1,593,000 1,663,000 27,000 —
Operating lease obligations 3,553,000 2,256,000 1,297,000 — —
Minimum purchase obligation 6,025,000 1,199,000 2,247,000 2,579,000 —
Joint venture purchase obligation 1,267,000 1,267,000 — — —
Clinical research study obligations 5,110,000 4,188,000 922,000 — —
Total $ 38,027,000 $ 12,273,000 $ 20,289,000 $ 5,465,000 $ —

2015.

Cash (used in) provided by operating, investing, and financing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 is summarized as follows:

	For the six months ended June 30,
	2016			2015
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(10,735,000	)	$	(9,788,000	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(105,000	)		(510,000	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		16,405,000			19,532,000
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		139,000			(14,000	)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	$	5,704,000		$	9,220,000

For the three months ended March 31,
2016 2015

Net cash used in operating activities $ (5,058,000 ) $ (5,030,000 )
Net cash used in investing activities (69,000 ) (187,000 )
Net cash provided by financing activities 62,000 3,779,000
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents 85,000 15,000
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents $ (4,980,000 ) $ (1,423,000 )

~~Index~~

Operating activities

Net cash used in operating activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 was ~~$5.1~~$10.7 million. Overall, our operational cash use ~~remained materially consistent~~increased during the six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015, due primarily to a decrease in losses from operations (when adjusted for non-cash items) of ~~$0.9~~$2.4 million offset by ~~a similar amount related to~~$3.4 million in changes in working capital.

Investing activities

Net cash used in investing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 resulted from cash outflows for payment for purchases of ~~tooling~~property and equipment of $0.1 ~~million, related to the development of our next generation Celution device.~~million. The cash outflow was ~~$0.1~~$0.4 million lower than the same period in 2015 due to expense reduction efforts implemented throughout 2016.

Financing Activities

The net cash provided by financing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 related primarily to a sale of common stock through ~~the Company’s~~our Rights Offering and ATM offering program. The cash inflow from financing activities was approximately ~~$3.7~~$3.1 million lower than the same period in 2015, primarily due to the fact that there was ~~$3.4~~$11.7 million less in capital raised during the ~~quarter~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015, ~~and~~ an increase of ~~$0.4~~$0.6 million in Joint Venture purchase ~~price~~ payments to ~~Olympus.~~

Olympus, and $9.2 million decrease in principal payment on long-term obligations and loan fees.

Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and that affect our recognition and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities.

While our estimates are based on assumptions we consider reasonable at the time they were made, our actual results may differ from our estimates, perhaps significantly. If results differ materially from our estimates, we will make adjustments to our financial statements prospectively as we become aware of the necessity for an adjustment.

We believe it is important for you to understand our most critical accounting policies. Our critical accounting policies and estimates remain consistent with those reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.

~~Recent Accounting Pronouncements~~

~~The recent accounting pronouncements applicable to the Company remain consistent with those reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.~~

~~Index~~

~~Item 3.~~

~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk~~

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risk related to fluctuations in interest rates and in foreign currency exchange rates. There have been no material changes in our market risks during the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016.

Interest Rate Exposure

We are not subject to market risk due to fluctuations in interest rates on our long-term obligations as they bear a fixed rate of interest. We might be exposed to increase in interest rates related to future financing activities to support our operations.

Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Exposure

Our exposure to market risk due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates relates primarily to our activities in Europe and Japan. Transaction gains or losses resulting from cash balances and revenues have not been significant in the past and we are not currently engaged in any hedging activity in the Euro, the Yen or other currencies. Based on our cash balances and revenues derived from markets other than the United States for the three months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the Euro or Yen against the U.S. ~~Dollar~~dollar would not result in a material foreign currency exchange loss. Consequently, we do not expect that reductions in the value of such sales denominated in foreign currencies resulting from even a sudden or significant fluctuation in foreign exchange rates would have a direct material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, the indirect effect of fluctuations in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations may affect international demand for our products. In addition, interest rate fluctuations may affect our customers’ buying patterns. Furthermore, interest rate and currency exchange rate fluctuations may broadly influence the United States and foreign economies resulting in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

~~Item 4.~~

~~Controls and Procedures~~

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or furnished pursuant to the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As required by Rule 13a-15(b) under the Exchange Act, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

~~Index~~

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

~~Item 1~~.

~~Legal Proceedings~~

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we have been involved in routine litigation incidental to the conduct of our business. As of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016, we were not a party to any material legal proceeding.

~~Item 1A.~~

~~Risk Factors~~

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business is subject to various risks, including those described in Item 1A “Risk Factors” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015.~~2015, which we strongly encourage you to review with all other information contained or incorporated by reference in this report before you decide to invest in our common stock. In addition to those risk factors, we identified the following new risks or substantive changes from the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K. If any of the risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Quarterly Reports, or discussed below actually occurs, our business, financial condition, results of operations and our future growth prospects could be materially and adversely affected. Under these circumstances, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

If you hold warrants issued pursuant to our recently completed rights offering, you may be limited in your ability to engage in certain hedging transactions that could provide you with financial benefits.

On June 15, 2016, we closed our rights offering to subscribe for units at a subscription price of $2.55 per unit, or the Rights Offering. Pursuant to the Rights Offering, we sold to our stockholders of record (as of May 20, 2016) an aggregate of 6,704,852 units consisting of 6,704,852 shares of common stock and 3,352,306 warrants, or Warrants, with each Warrant exercisable for one share of common stock at an exercise price of $3.06 per share.

Holders of Warrants were required to represent to us that they will not enter into any short sale or similar transaction with respect to our common stock for so long as they continue to hold Warrants. These requirements prevent our Warrant holders from pursuing certain investment strategies that could provide them greater financial benefits than they might have realized had they not been required to make this representation.

Absence of a public trading market for the Warrants may limit the ability to resell the Warrants.

The Warrants are listed for trading on NASDAQ under the symbol “CYTXW,” but there can be no assurance that a robust market will exist for the Warrants. Even if a market for the Warrants does develop, the price of the Warrants may fluctuate and liquidity may be limited. If the Warrants cease to be eligible for continued listing on NASDAQ, or if the market for the Warrants does not fully develop (or subsequently weakens), then purchasers of the Warrants may be unable to resell the Warrants or sell them only at an unfavorable price for an extended period of time, if at all. Future trading prices of the Warrants will depend on many factors, including:

our operating performance and financial condition;

our ability to continue the effectiveness of the registration statement covering the Warrants and the common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants;

the interest of securities dealers in making and maintaining a market; and

the market for similar securities.

The market price of our common stock may never exceed the exercise price of the Warrants issued in connection with the Rights Offering.

The Warrants issued pursuant to the Rights Offering became exercisable upon issuance and will expire 30 months from the date of issuance. The market price of our common stock may never exceed the exercise price of the Warrants prior to their date of expiration. Any Warrants not exercised by their date of expiration will expire worthless and we will be under no further obligation to the Warrant holder.

The Warrants contain features that may reduce Warrant holders’ economic benefit from owning them.

The Warrants contain features that allow us to redeem the Warrants and that prohibit Warrant holders from engaging in certain investment strategies. We may redeem the Warrants for $0.01 per Warrant once the closing price of our common stock has equaled or exceeded $7.65 per share, subject to adjustment, for ten consecutive trading days, provided that we may not do so prior to the first anniversary of closing of the Rights Offering, and only upon not less than 30 days’ prior written notice of redemption. If we give notice of redemption, Warrant holders will be forced to sell or exercise their Warrants or accept the redemption price. The notice of redemption could come at a time when it is not advisable or possible for Warrant holders to exercise the Warrants. As a result, Warrant holders may be unable to benefit from owning the Warrants being redeemed. In addition, for so long as Warrant holders continue to hold Warrants, they will not be permitted to enter into any short sale or similar transaction with respect to our common stock. This could prevent Warrant holders from pursuing investment strategies that could provide them greater financial benefits from owning the Warrants

Since the Warrants are executory contracts, they may have no value in a bankruptcy or reorganization proceeding.

In the event a bankruptcy or reorganization proceeding is commenced by or against us, a bankruptcy court may hold that any unexercised Warrants are executory contracts that are subject to rejection by us with the approval of the bankruptcy court. As a result, holders of the Warrants may, even if we have sufficient funds, not be entitled to receive any consideration for their Warrants or may receive an amount less than they would be entitled to if they had exercised their Warrants prior to the commencement of any such bankruptcy or reorganization proceeding.

If we are unable to retain key personnel, we may not be able to sustain or grow our business.

Our ability to operate successfully and manage our potential future growth depends significantly upon our ability to attract, retain, and motivate highly skilled and qualified research, technical, clinical, regulatory, sales, marketing, managerial and financial personnel. We compete for talent with numerous companies, as well as universities and non-profit research organizations. Our future success also depends on the personal efforts and abilities of the principal members of our senior management and scientific staff to provide strategic direction, manage our operations, and maintain a cohesive and stable environment. We have not entered into any employment agreements with our executive officers or key personnel, nor do we maintain key man life insurance on the lives of any of the members of our senior management. Although we have a stock option plan pursuant to which we provide our executive officers with various economic incentives to remain employed with us, these incentives may not be sufficient to retain them. The loss of key personnel for any reason or our inability to hire, retain, and motivate additional qualified personnel in the future could prevent us from sustaining or growing our business.

The results of the United Kingdom’s referendum on withdrawal from the European Union may have a negative effect on global economic conditions, financial markets and our business.

In June 2016, a majority of voters in the United Kingdom elected to withdraw from the European Union in a national referendum. The referendum was advisory, and the terms of any withdrawal are subject to a negotiation period that could last at least two years after the government of the United Kingdom formally initiates a withdrawal process. Nevertheless, the referendum has created significant uncertainty about the future relationship between the United Kingdom and the European Union, including with respect to the laws and regulations that will apply as the United Kingdom determines which European Union laws to replace or replicate in the event of a withdrawal. The referendum has also given rise to calls for the governments of other European Union member states to consider withdrawal. These developments, or the perception that any of them could occur, have had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on global economic conditions and the stability of global financial markets, and may significantly reduce global market liquidity and restrict the ability of key market participants to operate in certain financial markets. Any of these factors could depress economic activity and restrict our access to capital, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations and reduce the price of our securities.

~~Item 2.~~

~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None

~~Item 3.~~

~~Defaults Upon Senior Securities~~

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

~~Item 4.~~

~~Mine Safety Disclosures~~

~~None~~

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable

~~Item 5.~~

~~Other Information~~

Item 5. Other Information

None

~~Item 6.~~

~~Exhibits~~

Item 6. Exhibits

Refer to the Exhibit Index immediately following the signature page, which is incorporated herein by reference.

~~Index~~

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		CYTORI THERAPEUTICS, INC.

	~~By:~~	By:	/s/ Marc H. Hedrick
Dated: ~~May 10,~~August 5, 2016			Marc H. Hedrick
			President & Chief Executive Officer

	~~By:~~	By:	/s/ Tiago Girao
Dated: ~~May 10,~~August 5, 2016			Tiago Girao
			VP of Finance and Chief Financial Officer

~~Index~~

Exhibits Index

Exhibit No.		Description

~~3.1~~ 1.1		Form of Dealer-Manager Agreement by and between Cytori Therapeutics, Inc., Maxim Group LLC (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed with the Commission on May 10, 2016)

1.2		Amendment No. 1 to Dealer-Manager Agreement, dated June 12, 2016, by and between Cytori Therapeutics, Inc., Maxim Group LLC (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 13, 2016)

3.1		Composite Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Commission on March ~~11,~~16, 2015)

3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 14, 2003)

3.3		Amendment to Amended and Restated Bylaws of Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 6, 2014).

~~10.1~~ 3.4	~~2015 New Employee Incentive Plan~~	Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of Series A 3.6% Convertible Preferred Stock (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on ~~January 5, 2016).~~October 8, 2014)

~~10.2~~ 3.5		Certificate of Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (incorporated by reference to our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 10, 2016)

4.1		Form of ~~Stock Option Agreement under the New Employee Incentive Plan~~Non-Transferable Subscription Rights Certificate (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form ~~S-8,~~S-1/A, filed with the Commission on ~~March 15,~~May 10, 2016)

~~10.3~~ 4.2		Form of ~~Notice of Grant of Stock Option under~~Series R Warrant underlying the ~~2015 New Employee Incentive Plan~~Units (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form ~~S-8,~~S-1/A, filed with the Commission on ~~March 15,~~May 10, 2016)

~~10.4~~ 4.3		Form of Warrant Agreement by and between Cytori Therapeutics, Inc. and Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc. (incorporated by reference to our Registration Statement on Form S-1/A, filed with the Commission on May 10, 2016)

10.1**		Amendment ~~Two to Joint Venture Termination Agreement, dated January 8,~~of Solicitation/Amendment of Contract, effective April 1, 2016, by and between ~~the Company~~ASPR-BARDA and ~~Olympus Corporation (filed with this Form 10-Q)~~Cytori Therapeutics, Inc.

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

32.1*		Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350/ Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b), as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith).

101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH		XBRL Schema Document

101.CAL		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document

~~101.LAB~~ 101.DEF		XBRL Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB		XBRL Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document

These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

* These certifications are being furnished solely to accompany this report pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350 and are not being filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and are not to be incorporated by reference into any filing of the Company, whether made before or after the date hereof, regardless of any general incorporation language in such filing.

**	Filed herewith.

DELAWARE		33-0827593
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3020 CALLAN ROAD, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA		92121
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Large Accelerated Filer☐	o		Accelerated Filer☒	~~Non-Accelerated Filer~~ ☐	~~Smaller reporting company ☐~~ x
Non-Accelerated Filer	o	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	o

						Page
PART I		~~FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~
~~PART I~~	~~FINANCIAL INFORMATION~~
		Item 1.		~~Financial Statements~~
	~~Item 1.~~	~~Financial Statements~~

		~~Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets as of ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015 (unaudited)~~		3

				~~Consolidated Condensed Statements of~~ ~~Operations and Comprehensive ~~Loss~~(Loss) Income for the three and six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015 (unaudited)~~		4

				~~Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March 31,~~June 30, 2016 and 2015~~ ~~(unaudited)~~		5

				~~Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (unaudited)~~		6

		Item 2.		~~Management’s Discussion and~~ ~~Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~	12	13

		Item 3.		~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk~~		22

		Item 4.		~~Controls and Procedures~~		22

PART II		~~OTHER INFORMATION~~

		Item 1.		~~Legal Proceedings~~	23	22
		Item 1A.		~~Risk Factors~~		23
		Item 2.		~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~	23	24
		Item 3.		~~Defaults Upon Senior Securities~~	23	24
		Item 4.		~~Mine Safety Disclosures~~	23	24
		Item 5.		~~Other Information~~	23	24
		Item 6.	~~Exhibits~~	23 ~~Exhibits~~		24

	As of March 31, 2016			As of December 31, 2015
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,358,000		$	14,338,000
Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $795,000 and of $797,000 in 2016 and 2015, respectively		829,000			1,052,000
Inventories, net		4,462,000			4,298,000
Other current assets		1,866,000			1,555,000

Total current assets		16,515,000			21,243,000

Property and equipment, net		1,523,000			1,631,000
Restricted cash and cash equivalents		350,000			350,000
Other assets		1,682,000			1,521,000
Intangibles, net		8,923,000			9,031,000
Goodwill		3,922,000			3,922,000

Total assets	$	32,915,000		$	37,698,000

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	6,693,000		$	6,687,000
Current portion of long-term obligations, net of discount		1,724,000			—
Joint venture purchase obligation		1,267,000			1,750,000

Total current liabilities		9,684,000			8,437,000

Deferred revenues		101,000			105,000
Long-term deferred rent and other		189,000			269,000
Long-term obligations, net of discount, less current portion		15,198,000			16,681,000

Total liabilities		25,172,000			25,492,000

Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders’ equity:
Series A 3.6% convertible preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 13,500 shares issued; no shares outstanding in 2016 and 2015		—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 75,000,000 shares authorized; 13,310,740 and 13,003,893 shares issued and outstanding in 2016 and 2015, respectively		13,000			13,000
Additional paid-in capital		369,339,000			368,214,000
Accumulated other comprehensive income		747,000			996,000
Accumulated deficit		(362,356,000	)		(357,017,000	)

Total stockholders’ equity		7,743,000			12,206,000

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	32,915,000		$	37,698,000

	For the Three Months Ended March 31,
	2016			2015

Product revenues	$	1,333,000		$	902,000

Cost of product revenues		567,000			598,000

Gross profit		766,000			304,000

Development revenues:
Government contracts and other		1,585,000			1,444,000

Operating expenses:
Research and development		4,127,000			3,963,000
Sales and marketing		1,035,000			839,000
General and administrative		2,286,000			2,499,000
Change in fair value of warrants		—			15,444,000

Total operating expenses		7,448,000			22,745,000

Operating loss		(5,097,000	)		(20,997,000	)

Other income (expense):

Interest income		2,000			1,000
Interest expense		(657,000	)		(1,072,000	)
Other income, net		413,000			110,000

Total other expense		(242,000	)		(961,000	)

Net loss	$	(5,339,000	)	$	(21,958,000	)
Beneficial conversion feature for convertible preferred stock		—			(661,000	)
Net loss allocable to common stock holders	$	(5,339,000	)	$	(22,619,000	)

Basic and diluted net loss per share allocable to common stockholders	$	(0.41	)	$	(3.19	)

Basic and diluted weighted average shares used in calculating net loss per share allocable to common stockholders		13,086,376			7,080,590

Comprehensive loss:
Net loss	$	(5,339,000	)	$	(21,958,000	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income– foreign currency translation adjustments		(249,000	)		36,000
Comprehensive loss	$	(5,588,000	)	$	(21,922,000	)

	Three months ended

	March 31, 2016					March 31, 2015
	Product Revenues		% of Total			Product Revenues		% of Total

Americas	$	235,000		18	%	$	201,000		22	%
Japan		966,000		72	%		605,000		67	%
EMEA		132,000		10	%		92,000		10	%
Asia Pacific		—		0	%		4,000		1	%
Total product revenues	$	1,333,000		100	%	$	902,000		100	%

	March 31, 2016		December 31, 2015

Raw materials	$	981,000	$	1,009,000
Work in process		1,189,000		816,000
Finished goods		2,292,000		2,473,000
	$	4,462,000	$	4,298,000

	For the three months ended March 31,

	2016		2015

Product revenues - third party	$	1,333,000	$	902,000

	For the three months ended March 31,

	2016		2015

Research and development	$	3,992,000	$	3,835,000
Share-based compensation		135,000		128,000
Total research and development expenses	$	4,127,000	$	3,963,000

	As of March 31, 2016		As of December 31, 2015

Cash and cash equivalents	$	9,358,000	$	14,338,000

Current assets	$	16,515,000	$	21,243,000
Current liabilities		9,684,000		8,437,000
Working capital	$	6,831,000	$	12,806,000

	Payments due by period
Contractual Obligations	Total		Less than 1 year		1 – 3 years		3 – 5 years		More than 5 years

Long-term obligations	$	18,789,000	$	1,770,000	$	14,160,000	$	2,859,000	$	—
Interest commitment on long-term obligations		3,283,000		1,593,000		1,663,000		27,000		—
Operating lease obligations		3,553,000		2,256,000		1,297,000		—		—
Minimum purchase obligation		6,025,000		1,199,000		2,247,000		2,579,000		—
Joint venture purchase obligation		1,267,000		1,267,000		—		—		—
Clinical research study obligations		5,110,000		4,188,000		922,000		—		—
Total	$	38,027,000	$	12,273,000	$	20,289,000	$	5,465,000	$	—