UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 20162017

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____


Commission File Number 000-51371


LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New Jersey 57-1150621
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (IRS Employer Identification No.)

200 Executive Drive, Suite 340
West Orange, NJ
 
07052
 (Zip Code)
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(973) 736-9340
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes   No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 
Large accelerated filer 
Accelerated filer
   
 
Non-accelerated filer (Do(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes   No

As of August 2, 2016,8, 2017, there were 23,817,01424,719,055 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.
 


LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 20162017

PART I.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
 
Item 1.
1
 1
 3
 4
 5
 6
 8
Item 2.
20
Item 3.
35
Item 4.
3536
PART II.
36
Item 1.
36
Item 5.
36
Item 6.
36
 37
 

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.
Financial Statements

LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)

 
June 30,
2016
  
December 31,
2015
  
June 30,
2017
  
December 31,
2016
 
 (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)    
ASSETS            
CURRENT ASSETS:            
Cash and cash equivalents $10,950  $38,420  $7,210  $21,064 
Restricted cash  6,555   7,362   6,189   6,399 
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $8,604 and $9,126 at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively  11,671   9,613 
Accounts receivable, less allowance of $12,932 and $12,375 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively  17,886   15,383 
Inventories  1,278   1,043   1,884   1,687 
Prepaid income taxes and income taxes receivable  314   349   252   262 
Assets held for sale  46,029   45,911   16,820   16,847 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,630   2,566   2,586   2,894 
Total current assets  79,427   105,264   52,827   64,536 
        
PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES - At cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $121,361 and $122,037 at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively  59,079   66,508 
PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND FACILITIES - At cost, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $160,375 and $157,152 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively  55,132   55,445 
                
OTHER ASSETS:                
Noncurrent restricted cash  20,273   15,259   -   20,252 
Noncurrent receivables, less allowance of $660 and $797 at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively  4,567   4,993 
Noncurrent receivables, less allowance of $1,156 and $977 at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively  6,876   7,323 
Goodwill  14,536   14,536   14,536   14,536 
Other assets, net  1,116   1,190   860   1,115 
Total other assets  40,492   35,978   22,272   43,226 
TOTAL $178,998  $207,750  $130,231  $163,207 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
1

LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share amounts)
(Continued)

 
June 30,
2016
  
December 31,
2015
  
June 30,
2017
  
December 31,
2016
 
 (Unaudited)     (Unaudited)    
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY      
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
CURRENT LIABILITIES:            
Current portion of term loan $10,000  $10,000 
Current portion of capital lease obligations  -   114 
Current portion of finance obligation  3,355   - 
Current portion of credit agreement and term loan $8,000  $11,713 
Unearned tuition  15,159   21,390   20,528   24,778 
Accounts payable  11,892   12,863   14,235   13,748 
Accrued expenses  10,142   12,157   13,707   15,368 
Liabilities held for sale  14,719   14,236 
Other short-term liabilities  208   686   464   653 
Total current liabilities  65,475   71,446   56,934   66,260 
                
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:                
Long-term loan  31,510   32,124 
Long-term capital lease obligations  -   3,785 
Long-term finance obligation  -   9,672 
Long-term credit agreement and term loan  24,023   30,244 
Pension plan liabilities  5,537   5,549   5,279   5,368 
Accrued rent  3,673   4,177   5,278   5,666 
Other long-term liabilities  825   743 
Total liabilities  106,195   126,753   92,339   108,281 
                
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES                
                
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:        
Preferred stock, no par value - 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015  -   - 
Common stock, no par value - authorized: 100,000,000 shares at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015; issued and outstanding: 30,768,433 shares at June 30, 2016 and 29,727,555 shares at December 31, 2015  141,377   141,377 
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:        
Preferred stock, no par value - 10,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016  -   - 
Common stock, no par value - authorized: 100,000,000 shares at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016; issued and outstanding: 30,629,596 shares at June 30, 2017 and 30,685,017 shares at December 31, 2016  141,377   141,377 
Additional paid-in capital  27,860   27,292   28,779   28,554 
Treasury stock at cost - 5,910,541 shares at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015  (82,860)  (82,860)
(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings  (6,946)  2,260 
Treasury stock at cost - 5,910,541 shares at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016  (82,860)  (82,860)
Accumulated deficit  (43,744)  (26,044)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (6,628)  (7,072)  (5,660)  (6,101)
Total stockholders' equity  72,803   80,997 
Total stockholders’ equity  37,892   54,926 
TOTAL $178,998  $207,750  $130,231  $163,207 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
2

LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)

 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 2016  2015  2016  2015  2017  2016  2017  2016 
                        
REVENUE $41,894  $44,739  $85,337  $92,413  $61,865  $68,080  $127,144  $138,724 
COSTS AND EXPENSES:                                
Educational services and facilities  21,667   22,511   44,811   45,425   32,405   35,569   65,113   72,691 
Selling, general and administrative  23,072   26,595   50,084   56,234   35,554   35,750   73,879   75,905 
(Gain) loss on sale of assets  (6)  8   (395)  (35)
Gain on sale of assets  (63)  (6)  (89)  (395)
Total costs & expenses  44,733   49,114   94,500   101,624   67,896   71,313   138,903   148,201 
OPERATING LOSS  (2,839)  (4,375)  (9,163)  (9,211)  (6,031)  (3,233)  (11,759)  (9,477)
OTHER:                                
Interest income  8   12   72   21   9   8   40   72 
Interest expense  (1,522)  (1,541)  (3,094)  (3,029)  (699)  (1,541)  (5,881)  (3,132)
Other income  1,678   359   3,431   582   -   1,678   -   3,431 
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS BEFORE INCOME TAXES  (2,675)  (5,545)  (8,754)  (11,637)
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES  (6,721)  (3,088)  (17,600)  (9,106)
PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES  50   50   100   100   50   50   100   100 
LOSS FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS  (2,725)  (5,595)  (8,854)  (11,737)
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF INCOME TAXES  (413)  (2,010)  (352)  (2,751)
NET LOSS $(3,138) $(7,605) $(9,206) $(14,488) $(6,771) $(3,138) $(17,700) $(9,206)
Basic                                
Loss per share from continuing operations $(0.12) $(0.24) $(0.38) $(0.51)
Loss per share from discontinued operations  (0.01)  (0.09)  (0.01)  (0.12)
Net loss per share $(0.13) $(0.33) $(0.39) $(0.63) $(0.28) $(0.13) $(0.74) $(0.39)
Diluted                                
Loss per share from continuing operations $(0.12) $(0.24) $(0.38) $(0.51)
Loss per share from discontinued operations  (0.01)  (0.09)  (0.01)  (0.12)
Net loss per share $(0.13) $(0.33) $(0.39) $(0.63) $(0.28) $(0.13) $(0.74) $(0.39)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding:                                
Basic  23,448   23,132   23,400   23,094   23,962   23,448   23,787   23,400 
Diluted  23,448   23,132   23,400   23,094   23,962   23,448   23,787   23,400 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
3

LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS(LOSS) INCOME
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 2016  2015  2016  2015  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Net loss $(3,138) $(7,605) $(9,206) $(14,488) $(6,771) $(3,138) $(17,700) $(9,206)
Other comprehensive income                                
Employee pension plan adjustments  222   231   444   462   220   222   441   444 
Comprehensive loss $(2,916) $(7,374) $(8,762) $(14,026) $(6,551) $(2,916) $(17,259) $(8,762)

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
4

LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS'STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
  Common Stock  
Additional
Paid-in
  Treasury  
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
    
  Shares  Amount  Capital  Stock  Deficit)  Loss  Total 
BALANCE - January 1, 2016  29,727,555  $141,377  $27,292  $(82,860) $2,260  $(7,072)  80,997 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   (9,206)  -   (9,206)
Employee pension plan adjustments  -   -   -   -   -   444   444 
Stock-based compensation expense                            
Restricted stock  1,079,267   -   675   -   -   -   675 
Net share settlement for equity-based compensation  (38,389)  -   (107)  -   -   -   (107)
BALANCE - June 30, 2016  30,768,433  $141,377  $27,860  $(82,860) $(6,946) $(6,628) $72,803 

 Common Stock  
Additional
Paid-in
  Treasury  
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
     Common Stock  
Additional
Paid-in
  Treasury  
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
    
 Shares  Amount  Capital  Stock  Deficit)  Loss  Total  Shares  Amount  Capital  Stock  Deficit)  Loss  Total 
BALANCE - January 1, 2015  29,933,086  $141,377  $26,350  $(82,860) $5,610  $(7,467) $83,010 
BALANCE - January 1, 2017  30,685,017  $141,377  $28,554  $(82,860) $(26,044) $(6,101) $54,926 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   (14,488)  -   (14,488)  -   -   -   -   (17,700)  -   (17,700)
Employee pension plan adjustments, net of taxes  -   -   -   -   -   462   462 
Employee pension plan adjustments  -   -   -   -   -   441   441 
Stock-based compensation expense                                                        
Restricted stock  (16,356)  -   746   -   -   -   746   128,810   -   654   -   -   -   654 
Stock options  -   -   33   -   -   -   33 
Net share settlement for equity-based compensation  (49,075)  -   (104)  -   -   -   (104)  (184,231)  -   (429)  -   -   -   (429)
BALANCE - June 30, 2015  29,867,655  $141,377  $27,025  $(82,860) $(8,878) $(7,005) $69,659 
BALANCE - June 30, 2017  30,629,596  $141,377  $28,779  $(82,860) $(43,744) $(5,660) $37,892 
 Common Stock 
Additional
Paid-in
 Treasury 
Retained
Earnings
(Accumulated
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
   
 Shares Amount Capital Stock Deficit) Loss Total 
BALANCE - January 1, 2016  29,727,555  $141,377  $27,292  $(82,860) $2,260  $(7,072) $80,997 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   (9,206)  -   (9,206)
Employee pension plan adjustments  -   -   -   -   -   444   444 
Stock-based compensation expense                            
Restricted stock  1,079,267   -   675   -   -   -   675 
Net share settlement for equity-based compensation  (38,389)  -   (107)  -   -   -   (107)
BALANCE - June 30, 2016  30,768,433  $141,377  $27,860  $(82,860) $(6,946) $(6,628) $72,803 
See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
5

LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)

 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 2016  2015  2017  2016 
            
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:            
Net loss $(9,206) $(14,488) $(17,700) $(9,206)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:                
Depreciation and amortization  6,094   7,244   4,275   6,094 
Amortization of deferred finance charges  459   222   305   459 
Write-off of deferred finance charges  2,161   - 
Gain on disposition of assets  (395)  (40)  (89)  (395)
Gain on capital lease termination  (3,355)  -   -   (3,355)
Fixed asset donation  (58)  (9)  (18)  (58)
Provision for doubtful accounts  6,587   7,449   7,220   6,587 
Stock-based compensation expense  675   779   654   675 
Deferred rent  (271)  (380)  (245)  (271)
(Increase) decrease in assets:                
Accounts receivable  (8,570)  (11,143)  (9,276)  (8,570)
Inventories  (128)  (83)  (197)  (128)
Prepaid income taxes and income taxes receivable  35   30   10   35 
Prepaid expenses and current assets  178   294   301   178 
Other assets and charges  (1,044)  (880)
Other assets, net  (1,075)  (1,044)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:                
Accounts payable  (1,097)  3,032   (28)  (1,097)
Accrued expenses  (88)  1,069   (1,804)  (88)
Unearned tuition  (7,908)  (4,728)  (4,250)  (7,908)
Other liabilities  (46)  (14)  245   (46)
Total adjustments  (8,932)  2,842   (1,811)  (8,932)
Net cash used in operating activities  (18,138)  (11,646)  (19,511)  (18,138)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:                
Capital expenditures  (1,555)  (1,298)  (2,098)  (1,555)
Restricted Cash  816   - 
Restricted cash  210   816 
Proceeds from sale of property and equipment  432   80   122   432 
Net cash used in investing activities  (307)  (1,218)  (1,766)  (307)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:                
Payments on borrowings  (386)  (32,500)  (49,266)  (386)
Proceeds from borrowings  38,000   - 
Reclassifications of payments of borrowings from restricted cash  -   30,000   20,252   - 
Reclassifications of proceeds of borrowings from restricted cash  (5,023)  - 
Proceeds of borrowings from restricted cash  (5,000)  (5,023)
Payments of borrowings from restricted cash  5,000   - 
Payment of deferred finance fees  (645)  (250)  (1,134)  (645)
Proceeds from borrowings  -   8,500 
Net share settlement for equity-based compensation  (107)  (104)  (429)  (107)
Principal payments under capital lease obligations  (2,864)  (231)  -   (2,864)
Net cash used in financing activities  (9,025)  5,415 
Net provided by (cash used) in financing activities  7,423   (9,025)
NET DECREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS  (27,470)  (7,449)  (13,854)  (27,470)
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—Beginning of period  38,420   12,299   21,064   38,420 
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS—End of period $10,950  $4,850  $7,210  $10,950 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
6

  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  2016  2015 
       
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:      
Cash paid during the year for:      
Interest $2,782  $3,085 
Income taxes $112  $79 
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Liabilities accrued for or noncash purchases of fixed assets $1,391  $206 
LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
(Continued)

  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  2017  2016 
       
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:      
Cash paid for:      
Interest $1,882  $2,782 
Income taxes $106  $112 
SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:        
Liabilities accrued for or noncash purchases of fixed assets $2,004  $1,391 

See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.
 
7

LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 20162017 AND 20152016
(In thousands, except share and per share amounts and unless otherwise stated)
(Unaudited)

1.SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business Activities Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), “we”, “our” and “us”, as applicable) provide diversified career-oriented post-secondary education to recent high school graduates and working adults.  The Company, which currently operates 3028 schools in 15 states, and  offers programs in automotive technology, skilled trades (which include HVAC, welding and computerized numerical control and electronic systems technology, among other programs), healthcare services (which include nursing, dental assistant, medical administrative assistant and pharmacy technician, among other programs), hospitality services (which include culinary, therapeutic massage, cosmetology and aesthetics) and business and information technology (which includes information technology and criminal justice programs).  The schools operate under the Lincoln Technical Institute, Lincoln College of Technology, Lincoln College of New England, Lincoln Culinary Institute, and Euphoria Institute of Beauty Arts and Sciences and associated brand names.  Most of the campuses serve major metropolitan markets and each typically offers courses in multiple areas of study.  Five of the campuses are destination schools, which attract students from across the United States and, in some cases, from abroad. The Company’s other campuses primarily attract students from their local communities and surrounding areas.  All of the campuses are nationally or regionally accredited and are eligible to participate in federal financial aid programs by the U.S. Department of Education (the “DOE”) and applicable state education agencies and accrediting commissions which allow students to apply for and access federal student loans as well as other forms of financial aid.

In the first quarter of 2015, the Companywe reorganized itsour operations into three reportable business segments:  (a) Transportation and Skilled Trades, (b) Healthcare and Other Professions (“HOPS”), and (c) Transitional which refers to businesses that have been or are currently being phasedtaught out.  InIn November 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan for the Company to divest 17 of the 18 schools included in the HOPS segment due to a strategic shift in the Company’s business strategy.  The Company underwent an exhaustive process to divest the HOPS schools which proved successful in attracting various purchasers but, ultimately, did not result in a transaction that our Board believed would enhance shareholder value. When the decision was first made by the Board of Directors to divest HOPS, 18 campuses were operating in this segment.  By the end of 2017, we will have strategically closed seven underperforming campuses leaving a total of eleven campuses remaining under HOPS.   The Company believes that the closures and planned closures of the aforementioned campuses has positioned this segment and the Company to be more profitable going forward as well as maximizing returns for the Company’s shareholders.

The combination of several factors, including the inability of the prospective buyer of the HOPS segment to close on the purchase, the improvements the Company has implemented in the HOPS operations, the closure of seven underperforming campuses and the change in federal government administration, resulted in the Board reevaluating its Healthcaredivestiture plan and Other Professionsthe determination that shareholder value would more likely be enhanced by continuing to operate our HOPS segment as revitalized.  Consequently, in the first quarter of 2017, the Board of Directors abandoned the plan to divest the HOPS segment and the Company intends to retain the HOPS segment.  The results of operations of the campuses included in the HOPS business segment are reflected as continuing operations in the consolidated financial statements.
In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company completed the teach-out of its Hartford, Connecticut and then,Henderson (Green Valley), Nevada campuses.  Also in December, 2015,2016, the Company announced the closing of its Northeast Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center City Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and West Palm Beach, Florida facilities, each of which is expected to be fully taught out and closed during 2017.  In addition, in March 2017, the Board of Directors approved a plan to cease operations ofnot renew the remaining schoolleases at our schools in this segment located in Hartford, Connecticut. The Hartford school is scheduled to close in the fourth quarter of 2016.  Divestiture of the HealthcareBrockton, Massachusetts and Other Professions business segment marks a shift in the Company’s business strategy intended to enable the Company to focus its energyLowell, Massachusetts.  These schools, which are being taught out and resources predominantly on Transportation and Skilled Trades though some other programs will continueexpected to be available at some campuses.  The results of operations of the 17 campusesclosed in December 2017, are included in the Healthcare and Other ProfessionsTransitional segment that are being divested are reflected as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated financial statements. of June 30, 2017.

LiquidityFor the last several years, the Company and the proprietary school sector have faced deteriorating earnings. Government regulations have negatively impacted earnings by making it more difficult for potential students to obtain loans, which, when coupled with the overall economic environment, have discouraged potential students from enrolling in post-secondary schools. In light of these factors, the Company has incurred significant operating losses as a result of lower student population.  Despite these events, the Company believes that its likely sources of cash should be sufficient to fund operations for the next twelve months.months and thereafter for the foreseeable future.  At June 30, 2016,2017, the Company’s sources of cash primarily included cash from operations, and cash and cash equivalents of $37.8$13.4 million (of which $26.8$6.2 million is restricted). The Company is also continuing to take actions to improve cash flow by aligning its cost structure to its student population.
 
8

In addition to the current sources of capital discussed above that will provide short term liquidity, the Company plans to sell approximately $31.3 million inthree West Palm Beach, Florida properties and associated assets, net of liabilities, which are currently classified as held for sale and are expected to be sold within one year from the date of classificationclassification.  On March 14, 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement with Tambone Companies, LLC, pursuant to which the Company has agreed to sell two of which upthe three properties (the “West Palm Beach Property”) for a cash purchase price of $15.7 million.  The purchase and sale agreement, as amended, is among other things, subject to $10customary closing conditions but the Company expects to close on the transaction in the third quarter of 2017.  On April 28, 2017, the Company obtained from its lender, Sterling National Bank, an $8 million willbridge term loan secured by the West Palm Beach Property.  The bridge loan must be required to pay down debt. Please refer to Note 11 Subsequent Events.repaid upon the earlier of the sale of the West Palm Beach Property or October 1, 2017.
 
Basis of Presentation – The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements.  Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements have been omitted or condensed pursuant to such regulations.  These statements, which should be read in conjunction with the December 31, 20152016 consolidated financial statements and related disclosures of the Company included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed withfor the SEC on March 10,fiscal year ended December 31, 2016, reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments and impairments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for such periods.  The results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 20162017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full fiscal year ending December 31, 2016.2017.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Financial Statements – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period.  On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates the estimates and assumptions including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, impairments, fixed assets, income taxes, benefit plans and certain accruals.  Actual results could materially differ from those estimates.
8


New Accounting Pronouncements In March 2016, theThe Financial Accounting StandardStandards Board (“FASB”(the “FASB”) has issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-09, Improvements2017-09,” “Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718) — Scope of Modification Accounting.” ASU 2017-09 applies to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. entities that change the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The FASB adopted ASU No. 2016-09 simplifies several aspects2017-09 to provide clarity and reduce diversity in practice as well as cost and complexity when applying the guidance in Topic 718, Compensation—Stock Compensation, to the modification of the accounting forterms and conditions of a share-based payment transactions, includingaward. The amendments provide guidance on determining which changes to the income tax consequences. Under the new guidance, all excess tax benefitsterms and tax deficiencies should be recognized as income tax expense or benefit in the income statement. Further, tax benefits should be recognized regardlessconditions of whether the benefits reduce taxes payable in the current period.  Under the previous U.S. GAAP, excess tax benefits are recognized in additional paid-in capital; tax deficiencies are recognized either asshare-based payment award require an offsetentity to accumulated excess tax benefits, if any, or in the income statement. Also,apply modification accounting under the previous U.S. GAAP, excess tax benefits are not recognized until the deduction reduces taxes payable. The new guidanceTopic 718. ASU 2017-09 is effective for the Company on January 1, 2017, with earlier applicationall entities for annual periods, including interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2017-09 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, “Compensation—Retirement Benefits (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” ASU 2017-07 requires that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost are required to be presented in the statement of comprehensive income separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of operating income. The ASU is effective for annual period.periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluatingassessing the impact of ASU No. 2016-09, however it is not expected to have a material impactthis update on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB amended the ASU by creating ASU Topic 842, Leases. ASU Topic 842 requires a lessee to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with a lease term greater than 12 months. The main difference between previous U.S. GAAP and ASU Topic 842 is the recognition under ASU 842 of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous U.S. GAAP. The new guidance, effective for the Company on January 1, 2019, with earlier application permitted, is being evaluated to determine if it will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In November 2015,2017, the FASB issued guidanceASU No. 2017-04, “Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.”  ASU 2017-04 provides amendments to Accounting Standards Code (“ASC”) No. 350, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other, which simplifieseliminate Step 2 from the balance sheet classificationgoodwill impairment test. Entities should perform their goodwill impairment tests by comparing the fair value of deferred taxes.a reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value. The guidance requires that all deferred tax assetsamendments in this update are effective prospectively during interim and liabilities, along with any related valuation allowance, be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. This guidance is effective for public business entities for annual periods, and for interim periods within those periods beginning after December 15, 20162019, with early adoption permitted.  The Company early adopted the provisions of ASU 2017-04 as of December 31, 2015.  It does not have a materialApril 1, 2017.  As fair values for our operating units exceed their carrying values, there has been no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
9

The FASB has recently issued several amendments to the new standard on revenue recognition, ASU No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The amendments include ASU  No. 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)—Principal versus Agent Considerations,” which was issued in March 2016, and clarifies the implementation guidance for principal versus agent considerations in ASU 2014-09, and ASU No. 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)—Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” which was issued in April 2016, and amends the guidance in ASU No. 2014-09 related to identifying performance obligations. The new standard permits adoption either by using (i) a full retrospective approach for all periods presented in the period of adoption or (ii) a modified retrospective approach with the cumulative effect of initially applying the new standard recognized at the date of initial application and providing certain additional disclosures.
The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, with early adoption permitted for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We do not plan to early adopt and, accordingly, we will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2018. The Company’s assessment of the potential impact is substantially complete based on our review of current enrollment agreements and other revenue generating contracts. We believe the timing of recognizing revenue for tuition and student fees will not significantly change. The Company is closely reviewing its book revenue stream to determine whether the performance obligation of the Company is satisfied over time and revenue is recognized over the length of the student contract, which is the Company’s consolidated resultscurrent practice with respect to revenue recognition, or whether the performance obligation of operations, financial condition or the financial statement disclosures.Company is satisfied at the point in time and revenue is recognized when students’ books are delivered.  Additionally, we are currently assessing the impacts related to the accounting for contract assets separate from accounts receivable and are evaluating the point at which a student’s contract asset becomes a receivable.
We are in the process of updating our revenue accounting policy and implementing changes to our business process and controls in response to the new standard, as necessary.  During the second half of 2017, we will finalize our revenue related documentation.  The Company currently expects to adopt the new standard on a modified retrospective basis with the cumulative effect of the change reflected in retained earnings as of January 1, 2018 and not restate prior periods.

In April 2015,November 2016, the FASB issued accountingASU No. 2016-18: “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash.” This guidance relatedwas issued to address the diversity that exists in the classification and presentation of debt issuance costschanges in restricted cash on the balance sheet as a direct reduction fromstatement of cash flows. The amendments will require that the carrying amountstatement of cash flows explain the debt liability, consistent with debt discounts, rather than as an asset.  Amortization of debt issuance costs will continue to be reported as interest expense.  Debt issuance costs related to revolving credit arrangements, however, will continue to be presented as an assetchange during the period in total cash, cash equivalents and amortized ratably over the term of the arrangement.  In August 2015, the FASB issued accounting guidance related to the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements which clarifies that companies may continue to present unamortized debt issuance costs associated with line of credit arrangements as an asset.  These pronouncementsrestricted cash. The amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with earlyfiscal years. The amendments will be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company anticipates that the adoption permitted.  The guidance became effective for the Company on January 1, 2016 and did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, Income Statement – Extraordinary and Unusual Items. ASU 2015-01 simplifies income statement classification by removing the concept of extraordinary items from U.S. GAAP. Under the existing guidance, an entity is required to separately disclose extraordinary items, net of tax, in the income statement after income from continuing operations if an event or transaction is of unusual nature and occurs infrequently. This separate, net-of-tax presentation (and corresponding earnings per share impact) will no longer be allowed. The existing requirement to separately present items that are of unusual nature or occur infrequently on a pre-tax basis within income from continuing operations has been retained. The new guidance also requires similar separate presentation of items that are both unusual and infrequent. The guidance, effective for the Company on January 1, 2016, with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption, did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued a new standard – ASU No. 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern - that will explicitly require management to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures in certain circumstances. According to the new standard, substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists if it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date the entity’s financial statements are issued. In order to determine the specific disclosures, if any, that would be required, management will need to assess if substantial doubt exists, and, if so, whether its plans will alleviate such substantial doubt. The new standard requires assessment each annual and interim period and will be effective for the Company on December 31, 2016, with earlier application permitted.  The Company does not believe this guidance will have any impact on its consolidated financial statements.
9

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, 2016-15, “Revenue from ContractsStatement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments” to address eight specific cash flow issues with Customers, a new standard related to revenue recognition, which requires an entity to recognize the amountobjective of revenue to which it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The new standard will replace most ofreducing the existing revenue recognition standardsdiversity in GAAP.  In July 2015, the FASB voted to defer thepractice. The amendments are effective date by one year tofor financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company anticipates that the adoption will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company prospectively applied ASU 2016-09, “Improvements to Employee Share Based Payment Accounting,” to the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the recognition of tax benefits within the provision for taxes, which previously would have been recorded to additional paid-in capital. The impact for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $0. In addition, the Company retrospectively recognized no tax benefits within operating activities within the condensed consolidated statements of cash flow for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. The presentation requirements for cash flows related to employee taxes paid for withheld shares had no impact to any of the periods presented in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows, since such cash flows have historically been presented in financing activities. The treatment of forfeitures has not changed as the Company is electing to continue the current process of estimating the number of forfeitures. There was no cumulative-effect adjustment required to retained earnings under the prospective method as of the beginning of the year because all tax benefits had been previously recognized when the tax deductions related to stock compensation were utilized to reduce tax payable. The Company is not recording deferred tax assets or tax losses as the result of the adoption of ASU 2016-09.

In February 2016, the FASB issued guidance requiring lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for substantially all leases, with the exception of short-term leases. Leases will be classified as either financing or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the statements of income. The guidance is effective for annual reportingperiods, including interim periods within those periods, beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that date.  In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which defers the effective dateupdate will have on our results of revenue standard ASU 2014-09 by one year for all entitiesoperations, financial condition and permits early adoptions on a limited basis.  The new standard can be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of the change recognized at the date of the initial application. The Company is assessing the potential impact of the new standard on financial reporting and has not yet selected a transition method.statement disclosures.

Stock-Based Compensation – The Company measures the value of stock options on the grant date at fair value, using the Black-Scholes option valuation model.  The Company amortizes the fair value of stock options, net of estimated forfeitures, utilizing straight-line amortization of compensation expense over the requisite service period of the grant.

10

The Company measures the value of service and performance-based restricted stock on the fair value of a share of common stock on the date of the grant. The Company amortizes the fair value of service-based restricted stock utilizing straight-line amortization of compensation expense over the requisite service period of the grant.

The Company amortizes the fair value of the performance-based restricted stock based on the determination of the probable outcome of the performance condition.  If the performance condition is expected to be met, then the Company amortizes the fair value of the number of shares expected to vest utilizing straight-line basis over the requisite performance period of the grant.  However, if the associated performance condition is not expected to be met, then the Company does not recognize the stock-based compensation expense.

Income Taxes – The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with FASB Accounting Standards Code (“ASC”) Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”). This statement requires an asset and liability approach for measuring deferred taxes based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities existing at each balance sheet date using enacted tax rates for years in which taxes are expected to be paid or recovered.

In accordance with ASC 740, the Company assesses its deferred tax asset to determine whether all or any portion of the asset is more likely than not unrealizable.  A valuation allowance is required to be established or maintained when, based on currently available information, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In accordance with ASC 740, the Company’s assessment considers whether there has been sufficient income in recent years and whether sufficient income is expected in future years in order to utilize the deferred tax asset. In evaluating the realizability of deferred income tax assets, the Company considered, among other things, historical levels of income, expected future income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary reporting differences, and the expected impact of tax planning strategies that may be implemented to prevent the potential loss of future income tax benefits. Significant judgment is required in determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in the Company’s consolidated financial statements and/or tax returns.  Differences between anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.  Changes in, among other things, income tax legislation, statutory income tax rates, or future income levels could materially impact the Company’s valuation of income tax assets and liabilities and could cause the Company’s income tax provision to vary significantly among financial reporting periods.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company did not have any interest and penalties expense associated with uncertain tax positions.

2.WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES

The weighted average number of common shares used to compute basic and diluted loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 20152016 was as follows:
  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Basic shares outstanding  23,962,055   23,448,224   23,786,656   23,399,708 
Dilutive effect of stock options  -   -   -   - 
Diluted shares outstanding  23,962,055   23,448,224   23,786,656   23,399,708 

  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
  2016  2015  2016  2015 
Basic shares outstanding  23,448,224   23,131,856   23,399,708   23,094,040 
Dilutive effect of stock options  -   -   -   - 
Diluted shares outstanding  23,448,224   23,131,856   23,399,708   23,094,040 
10

For the three months ended June 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, options to acquire 537,718 and 604,378 and 6,799 shares respectively, were excluded from the above table because the Company reported a net loss for each quarter and, therefore, their impact on reported loss per share would have been antidilutive.  For the six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, options to acquire 583,848 and 412,286 and 51,673 shares respectively, were excluded from the above table because the Company recordedreported a net loss for each quarter and, therefore, their impact on reported loss per share would have been antidilutive.  For the three and six months ended June 30, 2015,2017, options to acquire 540,567170,667 shares were excluded from the above table because they have an exercise price that is greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock and, therefore, their impact on reported lossincome (loss) per share would have been antidilutive.
In 2013, and 2014, the Company issued performance shares that vest when certain performance conditions are satisfied.  As of June 30, 2016, these performance conditions were not met for most of these shares.  As a result, the Company has determined that most of these shares are contingently issuable.  Accordingly, 73,827 shares of outstanding performance shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, and 152,837 shares have been excluded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.  Refer to Note 6 for more information on performance shares.

3.DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

On November 3, 2015, the Board of Directors approved a plan for the Company to divest 17 of the 18 schools included in its Healthcare and Other Professions segment.  The planned divestiture of the Company’s Healthcare and Other Professions segment constitutes a strategic shift for the Company.  The results of operations of these campuses are reflected as discontinued operations in the condensed consolidated financial statements.  Implementation of the plan will result in the Company’s operations being focused solely on the Transportation and Skilled Trades segment.

The results of operations at these 17 campuses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015 were as follows:


  Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2016  2015  2016  2015 
Revenue $26,186  $27,654  $53,387  $56,700 
                 
Loss before income tax  (413)  (2,010)  (352)  (2,751)
Income tax benefit  -   -   -   - 
Net loss from discontinued operations $(413) $(2,010) $(352) $(2,751)

On December 3, 2015, the Board of Directors approved a plan to cease operations at the Hartford, Connecticut school which is scheduled to close in the fourth quarter of 2016 and is included in the Transitional segment.

4.GOODWILL AND LONG-LIVED ASSETS

The Company reviews long-lived assets for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable.  There were no long-lived asset impairments during the three and six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 2015.2016.

11

The Company reviews goodwill and intangible assets for impairment when indicators of impairment exist.  Annually, or more frequently if necessary, the Company evaluates goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives for impairment, with any resulting impairment reflected as an operating expense.  The Company concluded that, as of June 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, there was no indicator of potential impairment and, accordingly, the Company did not test goodwill for impairment.
11


The carrying amount of goodwill at June 30, 20162017 and 20152016 is as follows:

  
Gross
Goodwill
Balance
  
Accumulated
Impairment
Losses
  
Net
Goodwill
Balance
 
Balance as of January 1, 2016 $108,417  $(93,881) $14,536 
Adjustments  -   -   - 
Balance as of June 30, 2016 $108,417  $(93,881) $14,536 
  
Gross
Goodwill
Balance
  
Accumulated
Impairment
Losses
  
Net
Goodwill
Balance
 
Balance as of January 1, 2017 $117,176  $(102,640) $14,536 
Adjustments  -   -   - 
Balance as of June 30, 2017 $117,176  $(102,640) $14,536 
  
Gross
Goodwill
Balance
  
Accumulated
Impairment
Losses
  
Net
Goodwill
Balance
 
Balance as of January 1, 2016 $117,176  $(93,881) $23,295 
Adjustments  -   -   - 
Balance as of June 30, 2016 $117,176  $(93,881) $23,295 

  
Gross
Goodwill
Balance
  
Accumulated
Impairment
Losses
  
Net
Goodwill
Balance
 
Balance as of January 1, 2015 $115,872  $(93,665) $22,207 
Adjustments  -   -   - 
Balance as of June 30, 2015 $115,872  $(93,665) $22,207 
As of June 30, 2017, the goodwill balance is related to the Transportation and Skilled Trades segment.  As of June 30, 2016, the goodwill balance consists of $14.5 million related to the Transportation and Skilled Trades segment and $8.8 million related to the Healthcare and Other Professions segment.

Intangible assets, which are included in other assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets, consist of the following:

  Trade Name  Curriculum  Total 
Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2015 $310  $160  $470 
Adjustments  -   -   - 
Gross carrying amount at June 30, 2016  310   160   470 
             
Accumulated amortization at December 31, 2015  308   112   420 
Amortization  2   7   9 
Accumulated amortization at June 30, 2016  310   119   429 
             
Net carrying amount at June 30, 2016 $-  $41  $41 
             
Weighted average amortization period (years)  7   10     
  Curriculum 
Gross carrying amount at December 31, 2016 $160 
Adjustments  - 
Gross carrying amount at June 30, 2017  160 
     
Accumulated amortization at December 31, 2016  128 
Amortization  7 
Accumulated amortization at June 30, 2017  135 
     
Net carrying amount at June 30, 2017 $25 
     
Weighted average amortization period (years)  10 

Amortization of intangible assets was less than $0.1 million for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 2015.2016.

12

The following table summarizes the estimated future amortization expense:

Year Ending December 31,
      
Remainder of 2016 $9 
2017  16 
Remainder of 2017 $12 
2018  16   13 
 $41  $25 
12


5.4.LONG-TERM DEBT AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS

Long-term debt and lease obligations consist of the following:

 
June 30,
2016
  
December 31,
2015
  
June 30,
2017
  
December 31,
2016
 
Credit agreement (a) $32,023  $- 
Term loan (a) $41,510  $42,124   -   44,267 
Finance obligation (b)  3,355   9,672 
Capital lease-property (with a rate of 8.0%) (c)  -   3,899 
  44,865   55,695   32,023   44,267 
Less current maturities  (13,355)  (10,114)  (8,000)  (11,713)
 $31,510  $45,581  $24,023  $32,554 

(a) On JulyMarch 31, 2015,2017, the Company entered into a secured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with three lenders, AlostarSterling National Bank (the “Bank”) pursuant to which the Company obtained a credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of Commerceup to $55 million (the “Credit Facility”).  The Credit Facility consists of (a) a $30 million loan facility (“Alostar”Facility 1”), HPF Holdco, LLCwhich is comprised of a $25 million revolving loan designated as “Tranche A” and Rushing Creek 4, LLC,a $5 million non-revolving loan designated as “Tranche B,” which Tranche B was repaid during the quarter ended June 30, 2017, and (b) a $25 million revolving loan facility (“Facility 2”), which includes a sublimit amount for letters of credit of $10 million.  The Credit Facility replaces a term loan facility (the “Prior Credit Facility”) from a lender group led by HPF Service, LLC, as administrative agentwhich was repaid and collateral agent (the “Agent”), for an aggregate principal amount of $45 million (the “Term Loan”).  The July 31, 2015 credit agreement, alongterminated concurrently with subsequent amendments to the Credit Agreement dated December 31, 2015 and February 29, 2016, are collectively referred to as the “Credit Agreement.”  As of December 31, 2015 and prior to the effectiveness of a second amendment to the Credit AgreementFacility.  The term of the Credit Facility is 38 months, maturing on February 29, 2016 (the “Second Amendment”), the Term Loan consisted of a $30 million term loan (the “Term Loan A”) from HPF Holdco, LLC, Rushing Creek 4, LLC and Tiger Capital Group, LLC,May 31, 2020.
The Credit Facility is secured by a first priority lien in favor of the AgentBank on substantially all of the real and personal property owned by the Company and a $15 million term loan (the “Term Loan B”) from Alostar securedas well as mortgages on four parcels of real property owned by a $15.3 million cash collateral account. Pursuant to the Second Amendment, the Company received an additional $5 million term loan from Alostar within Connecticut, Colorado, Tennessee and Texas at which four of the Company’s schools are located.

At the closing, the Company repaid $5 million of the principal amount of the Term Loan A.  Accordingly, upon the effectiveness of the Second Amendment, the aggregate term loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement remained at approximately $45 million, consisting of an approximatedrew $25 million Term Loanunder Tranche A and a $20 million Term Loan B.  In addition,of Facility 1, which, pursuant to the Second Amendment, the amount of cash collateral securing the Term Loan B was increased to $20.3 million.  At the Company’s request, a percentage of the cash collateral may be released to the Company at the Agent’s sole discretion and with the consent of Alostar upon the satisfaction of certain criteria as outlined in the Credit Agreement.  The Term Loan, which matures on July 31, 2019, replaced a previously existing $20 million revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders, which was due to expire on April 5, 2016.  The previously existing revolving credit facility was terminated concurrently with the effective dateterms of the Credit Agreement, on July 31, 2015 (the “Closing Date”).was used to repay the Prior Credit Facility and to pay transaction costs associated with closing the Credit Facility.  After the disbursements of such amounts, the Company retained approximately $1.8 million of the borrowed amount for working capital purposes.

A portionAlso, at closing, $5 million was drawn under Tranche B and, pursuant to the terms of the proceedsCredit Agreement, was deposited into an interest-bearing pledged account (the “Pledged Account”) in the name of the Term Loan was usedCompany maintained at the Bank in order to secure payment obligations of the Company with respect to the costs of remediation of any environmental contamination discovered at certain of the mortgaged properties upon completion of environmental studies undertaken at such properties.  Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, funds will be released from the Pledged Account upon request by the Company to (i) repay approximately $6.3 millionreimburse the Company for costs incurred for environmental remediation, if required.  Upon the completion of any such environmental remediation or upon determination that no environmental remediation is necessary, funds remaining in the Pledged Account will be released from the Pledged Account and applied to the outstanding principal accrued interestbalance of Tranche B and fees dueavailability under Tranche B will be permanently reduced to zero and, accordingly, the previouslymaximum principal amount of Facility 1 will be permanently reduced to $25 million.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2017 the environmental studies were completed and revealed no environmental issues existing at the properties.  Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, the $5 million on deposit in the Pledged Account was released and used to repay the non-revolving loan outstanding under Tranche B.  Upon the repayment of Tranche B, the maximum principal amount of Facility 1 was permanently reduced to $25 million.

Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, all draws under Facility 2 for letters of credit or revolving credit facility, (ii) fund the $20.3 millionloans must be secured by cash collateral account securing the portionin an amount equal to 100% of the Term Loan provided by Alostar, (iii) fund approximately $7.4 million in a cash collateral account securingaggregate stated amount of the letters of credit issued under the previously existingand revolving credit facility that remainloans outstanding after the termination of that facility and (iv) pay transaction expenses in connection with the Term Loan and the terminationthrough draws from Facility 1 or other available cash of the previously existing revolving credit facility.  The remaining proceeds of the Term Loan of approximately $11 million may be used by the Company to finance capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes consistent with the terms of the Credit Agreement.Company.

Interest will accrueAccrued interest on the Term Loan at a per annum rate equal to the greater of (i) 11% or (ii) 90-day LIBOR plus 9%  determined monthly by the Agent andeach revolving loan will be payable monthly in arrears.  The principal balanceRevolving loans under Tranche A of the Term LoanFacility 1 will be repaid inbear interest at a rate per annum equal monthly installments, commencing on August 1, 2017, determined as the quotient of (i) 10% of the outstanding principal balance of the Term Loan as of July 2, 2017 divided by (ii) 12.  A final installment of principal and all accrued and unpaid interest will be due on the maturity date of the Term Loan.

The Term Loan may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time, subject to the paymentgreater of (x) the Bank’s prime rate plus 2.50% and (y) 6.00%.  The amount borrowed under Tranche B of Facility 1 and revolving loans under Facility 2 will bear interest at a prepayment premiumrate per annum equal to (i) 5%the greater of (x) the principal amount prepaid at any time up to but not including the second anniversary of the Closing DateBank’s prime rate and (ii) 3% of the principal amount prepaid at any time commencing on the second anniversary of the Closing Date up to but not including the third anniversary of the Closing Date.  In the event of any sale or other disposition of a school or real property by the Company permitted under the Term Loan, the net proceeds of such sale or disposition must be used to prepay the Loan in an amount determined pursuant to the Credit Agreement, subject to the applicable prepayment premium; provided, however, that no prepayment premium will be due with respect to up to $15 million of aggregate repayments of the Term Loan made during the first year that the Term Loan is outstanding.  A portion of the net cash proceeds of any disposition of a school in an amount determined pursuant to the terms of the Term Loan, must be deposited and held as cash collateral in a deposit account controlled by the Agent until the conditions for release set forth in the Term Loan are satisfied.  In connection with the assets which are currently classified as held for sale and are expected to be sold within one year, the Company is required to classify $10 million as short term debt due to the Term Loan prepayment minimum required with respect to any such disposition.(y) 3.50%.
 
13

The Term Loan contains customary representations, warranties and covenants such as minimum financial responsibility composite score, cohort default rate, and other financial covenants, including minimum liquidity, maximum capital expenditures, maximum 90/10 ratio and minimum EBITDA (as defined in the Term Loan), as well as affirmative and negative covenants and events of default customary for facilities of this type.  The Company was in compliance with all covenants as of June 30, 2016.  Subsequent to the 2015 fiscal year end, pursuant to the Second Amendment, the financial covenants were adjusted and, at the Company’s election, will be adjusted for fiscal year 2017 and for each subsequent fiscal year until the maturity of the Term Loan at either the levels applicable to fiscal year 2016 (and each fiscal quarter thereof) contained in the Credit Agreement as of the Closing Date or the levels applicable to fiscal year 2016 (and each fiscal quarter thereof) contained in the Second Amendment.  In the event that the Company elects to re-set the financial covenants at the 2016 covenant levels contained in the Second Amendment, the Company will be required to prepay on or before January 15, 2017, without prepayment penalty, amounts outstanding under the Term Loan up to $4 million.

The Credit Agreement contains events of default, the occurrence and continuation of which provide the Company’s lenders with the right to exercise remedies against the Company and the collateral securing the Term Loan, including the Company’s cash. These events of default include, among other things, the Company’s failure to pay any amounts due under the Term Loan, a breach of covenants under the Credit Agreement, the Company’s insolvency and the insolvency of its subsidiaries, the occurrenceEach issuance of a material adverse event, the occurrence of any default under certain other indebtedness, and a final judgment against the Company in an amount greater than $1 million.

Also, in connection with the Term Loan, the Company paid to the Agent a commitment fee of $1 million on the Closing Date and is required to pay to the Agent other customary fees for facilities of this type. Total fees for the Term Loan were $2.8 million during fiscal year 2015. During the first quarter of 2016, in connection with the effectiveness of the Second Amendment, the Company paid loan modification fees of $0.5 million.  These deferred finance fees are netted against the Term Loan on the condensed consolidated balance sheet and amortized to interest expense on the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

As of June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company had $44.3 million and $44.7 million outstanding under the Term Loan; offset by $2.7 million and $2.5 million of deferred finance fees, respectively.

(b) The Company completed a sale and a leaseback of several facilities on December 28, 2001. The Company retained a continuing involvement in the lease and, as a result, it is prohibited from utilizing sale-leaseback accounting. Accordingly, the Company had treated this transaction as a finance lease. In January 2016, the lease was amended to cure certain provisions related to continuing involvement and, as a consequence, achieved sales treatment.  In the first quarter of 2016, the lease was converted to an operating lease and rent payments are included in educational, services and facilities expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.  In addition, the finance obligation, net of land and buildings, is being amortized straight-line through December 31, 2016.

(c) In 2009, the Company assumed a real estate capital lease for a property located in Fern Park, Florida having a term continuing through October 31, 2032.  On February 27, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a plan to cease operations of its school located at the Fern Park, Florida property, which school closed in the first quarter of 2016.  In connection with the closure of the Fern Park, Florida school, on February 12, 2016, the Company paid a $2.8 million lease termination fee to the landlord of the Fern Park, Florida property in connection with the amendment and early termination of the 2009 lease agreement.  The amended lease agreement subsequently expired on April 10, 2016.

(d)  On April 12, 2016, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “L/C Agreement”) with Sterling National Bank (“Sterling” under which Sterling has agreed to issue lettersletter of credit from time to time at 100% margin against available funds in a cash collateral account maintained byunder Facility 2 will require the Company at Sterling.  The maximum availability under the L/C Agreement is $9.5 million.  The Company will pay Sterlingpayment of a letter of credit fee to the Bank equal to a rate per annum of 1.75% on the daily amount available to be drawn under each outstandingthe letter of credit, which fee isshall be payable in quarterly installments in arrears.  The L/C Agreement maturesLetters of credit totaling $6.2 million that were outstanding under a $9.5 million letter of credit facility previously provided to the Company by the Bank, which letter of credit facility was set to mature on April 1, 2017, and replaces a letterare treated as letters of credit under Facility 2.

Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Bank receives an unused facility fee on the average daily unused balance of Facility 1 at a rate per annum equal to 0.50%, which fee is payable quarterly in arrears.  In addition, the Company is required to maintain, on deposit with the Bank in one or more non-interest bearing accounts, a prior lender.  The L/Cminimum of $5 million in quarterly average aggregate balances.  If in any quarter the required average aggregate account balance is not maintained, the Company is required to pay the Bank a fee of $12,500 for that quarter.  Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, in the event that the Company terminates the Credit Facility or refinances with another lender within 18 months of closing, the Company shall be required to pay the Bank a breakage fee of $500,000.

In addition to the foregoing, the Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants that restrict capital expenditures, prohibit the incurrence of a net loss commencing on December 31, 2018 and require a minimum adjusted EBITDA and a minimum tangible net worth which is an annual covenant, as well as events of default customary for facilities of this type.  As of June 30, 2017, the Company is in compliance with all covenants.

In connection with the Credit Agreement, the Company paid the Bank an origination fee in the amount of $250,000 and other fees and reimbursements that are customary for facilities of this type.

The Company incurred an early termination premium of approximately $1.8 million in connection with the termination of the Prior Credit Facility.

On April 28, 2017, the Company entered into an additional secured credit agreement with the Bank, pursuant to which the Company has obtained a short term loan in the principal amount of $8 million, the proceeds of which are to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes.  The loan bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of the Bank’s prime rate plus 2.50% or 6.00%.
The loan is secured by real property assets located in West Palm Beach, Florida at which schools operated by the Company are currently located.  The loan is payable interest only until its maturity, which will occur upon the earlier of October 1, 2017 and the date of the sale of the West Palm Beach, Florida property.  Pursuant to a purchase and sale agreement, as amended, the Company has agreed to sell two of three properties located in West Palm Beach, Florida to Tambone Companies, LLC for a cash purchase price of $15.7 million.  The Company expects this sale to be completed in the third quarter of 2017.
As of June 30, 2017, the Company had $33 million outstanding under the Credit Facility (which includes the short term loan of $8 million); offset by $1.0 million of deferred finance fees.  As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $44.3 million outstanding under the Prior Credit Facility; offset by $2.3 million of deferred finance fees, which were written-off.  As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no letters of credit in the aggregate principal amount of $6.2 million outstanding, respectively.  As of June 30, 2017, there are no revolving loans outstanding under the L/C Agreement.Facility 2.
14


Scheduled maturities of long-term debt and lease obligations at December 31, 2015June 30, 2017 are as follows:
Year ending December 31,
   
2016 $10,000 
2017  3,173 
2018  3,462 
2019  27,632 
  $44,267 

The finance obligation of $3.4 million is excluded from the scheduled maturities schedule as it is a non-cash liability.
Year ending December 31,
   
2017 $8,000 
2018  - 
2019  - 
2020  25,000 
  $33,000 

6.5.STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Restricted Stock

The Company has two stock incentive plans:  a Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “LTIP”) and a Non-Employee Directors Restricted Stock Plan (the “Non-Employee Directors Plan”).

Under the LTIP, certain employees received awards of restricted shares of common stock based on service and performance.  The number of shares granted to each employee is based on the fair market value of a share of common stock on the date of grant.

14

On May 13, 2016 and January 16, 2017, performance-based restricted shares were granted to certain employees of the Company, which vest over two years on March 15, 2017 and March 15, 2018 based upon the attainment of a financial responsibility ratio during each fiscal year ending December 31, 2016 and 2017.  There is no vesting periodrestriction on the right to vote or the right to receive dividends onwith respect to any of thethese restricted shares.

On June 2, 2014 and December 18, 2014, performance-based restricted shares were granted to certain employees of the Company, which vest over three years based upon the attainment of (i) a specified operating income margin during any one or more of the fiscal years in the period beginning January 1, 2015 and ending December 31, 2017 and (ii) the attainment of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization targets during each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 through 2017.  There is no vesting periodrestriction on the right to vote or the right to receive dividends onwith respect to any of the restricted shares.

On April 29, 2013, performance-based shares were granted which vest over four years based upon the attainment of (i) a specified operating income margin during any one or more of the fiscal years in the period beginning January 1, 2013 and ending December 31, 2016 and (ii) the attainment of earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization targets during each of the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 through 2016.  There is no vesting period on the right to vote or the right to receive dividends on any of thethese restricted shares.

Pursuant to the Non-Employee Directors Plan, each non-employee director of the Company receives an annual award of restricted shares of common stock on the date of the Company’s annual meeting of shareholders.  The number of shares granted to each non-employee director is based on the fair market value of a share of common stock on that date.  The restricted shares vest on the first anniversary of the grant date; however, theredate.  There is no vesting period on the right to vote or the right to receive dividends onwith respect to these restricted shares.

For the six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company completed a net share settlement for 38,389184,231 and 49,07538,389 restricted shares, respectively, on behalf of certain employees that participate in the LTIP upon the vesting of the restricted shares pursuant to the terms of the LTIP.  The net share settlement was in connection with income taxes incurred on restricted shares that vested and were transferred to the employeeemployees during 20162017 and/or 2015,2016, creating taxable income for the employee.employees.   At the employees’ request, the Company will pay these taxes on behalf of the employees in exchange for the employees returning an equivalent value of restricted shares to the Company.  These transactions resulted in a decrease of $0.4 million and $0.1 million or less for each of the three and six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively, to equity on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as the cash payment of the taxes effectively was a repurchase of the restricted shares granted in previous years.

15

The following is a summary of transactions pertaining to restricted stock:

 Shares  
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share
  Shares  
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
Per Share
 
Nonvested restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2015  450,494  $3.69 
Nonvested restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2016  1,143,599  $1.89 
Granted  1,105,487   1.67   181,208   2.58 
Canceled  (26,200)  5.63   (52,398)  5.63 
Vested  (244,029)  3.05   (650,130)  1.74 
                
Nonvested restricted stock outstanding at June 30, 2016  1,285,752   2.03 
Nonvested restricted stock outstanding at June 30, 2017  622,279   1.92 

The restricted stock expense for the three months ended June 30, 20162017 and 20152016 was $0.3 million and $0.4$0.3 million, respectively.  The restricted stock expense for the six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 20152016 was $0.7 million and $0.8$0.7 million, respectively.  The unrecognized restricted stock expense as of June 30, 20162017 and December 31, 20152016 was $2.4$0.9 million and $1.3$1.5 million, respectively.  As of June 30, 2016,2017, outstanding restricted shares under the LTIP had aggregate intrinsic value of $1.9 million.

Stock Options

The fair value of the stock options used to compute stock-based compensation is the estimated present value at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model.  The following is a summary of transactions pertaining to stock options:

  Shares  
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2015  246,167  $12.52  3.98 years $- 
Canceled  (18,500)  14.92    - 
              
Outstanding at June 30, 2016  227,667   12.33  3.73 years  - 
              
Vested or expected to vest  227,667   12.33  3.73 years  - 
              
Exercisable as of June 30, 2016  227,667   12.33  3.73 years  - 
  Shares  
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
Per Share
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
 
Outstanding at December 31, 2016  218,167  $12.11  3.33 years $- 
Canceled  (47,500)  12.37    - 
              
Outstanding at June 30, 2017  170,667   12.04  3.49 years  - 
              
Vested or expected to vest  170,667   12.04  3.49 years  - 
              
Exercisable as of June 30, 2017  170,667   12.04  3.49 years  - 

As of June 30, 2016,2017, there was no unrecognized pre-tax compensation expense.

The following table presents a summary of stock options outstanding:

  At June 30, 2016    At June 30, 2017 
  Stock Options Outstanding  Stock Options Exercisable    Stock Options Outstanding  Stock Options Exercisable 
Range of Exercise PricesRange of Exercise Prices  Shares  
Contractual
Weighted
Average Life
(years)
  
Weighted
Average Price
  Shares  
Weighted
Average Exercise
Price
 Range of Exercise Prices  Shares  
Contractual
Weighted
Average Life
(years)
  
Weighted
Average Price
  Shares  
Weighted
Average Exercise
Price
 
$4.00-$13.99   165,167   3.85  $9.46   165,167  $9.46 4.00-$13.99   122,667   3.75  $8.77   122,667  $8.77 
$14.00-$19.99   31,500   2.72   19.20   31,500   19.20 14.00-$19.99   17,000   2.34   19.98   17,000   19.98 
$20.00-$25.00   31,000   4.10   20.62   31,000   20.62 20.00-$25.00   31,000   3.10   20.62   31,000   20.62 
                                            
    227,667   3.73   12.33   227,667   12.33     170,667   3.49   12.04   170,667   12.04 
7.6.INCOME TAXES

The provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 was less than $0.1 million, or 1.9%0.7% of pretax loss, and less than $0.1 million, or 0.9%1.6% of pretax loss, respectively.  The provision for income taxes for the six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 20152016 was $0.1 million, or 1.1%0.6% of pretax loss, and $0.1 million, or 0.9%1.1% of pretax loss, respectively.

The Company assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to userecover the existing deferred tax assets.  A significant piece of objective negative evidence was the cumulative losses incurred by the Company in recent years.  On the basis of this evaluation the realization of the Company’s deferred tax assets was not deemed to be more likely than not and thus the Company maintained a full valuation allowance on its net deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2016.2017.

8.7.CONTINGENCIES

In the ordinary conduct of its business, the Company is subject to certain other lawsuits, investigations and claims, including, but not limited to, claims involving students or graduates and routine employment matters. Although the Company cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against it, the Company does not believe that any currently pending legal proceedings to which it is a party will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations or cash flows.

On December 15,July 13, 2015, the Commonwealth of Massachusetts filed a complaint against the Company received an administrative subpoena fromin the Suffolk County Superior Court alleging certain violations of the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act since at least 2010 and continuing through 2013. At the same time, the Company agreed to the entry of a Final Judgment by Consent in order to avoid the time, burden, and expense of contesting such liability. As part of the Final Judgment by Consent, the Company denied all allegations of wrongdoing and any liability for the claims asserted in the complaint. The Company, however, paid the sum of $850,000 to the Massachusetts Attorney General and has agreed to forgive $165,000 of debt consisting of unpaid balances owed to the Company by certain graduates in the sole discretion of the StateMassachusetts Attorney General. The Final Judgment by Consent also provided certain requirements for calculation of Maryland. Pursuant tojob placement rates in Massachusetts and imposed certain disclosure obligations that are consistent with regulations that have been enacted by the subpoena, Maryland’s Attorney General has requested from the Company documents and detailed information relating to its Columbia, Maryland campus.  The Company has responded to this request and intends to continue cooperating with the Maryland Attorney General’s Office.Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

9.8.SEGMENTS

The for-profit education industry has been impacted by numerous regulatory changes, the changing economy and an onslaught of negative articles in the press.media attention. As a result of these actions, student populations have declined and operating costs have increased.  Over the past few years, the Company has closed over 10ten locations and exited its online business.  The Company reviewed how it has been structured and decided to change its organization to enableIn 2016, the Company ceased operations in Hartford, Connecticut; Fern Park, Florida; and Henderson (Green Valley), Nevada. In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Board of Directors approved plans to better allocate financialcease operations at our schools in Center City Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Northeast Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and human resourcesWest Palm Beach, Florida.  Each of these schools is expected to respondclose in 2017.  In addition, in March 2017, the Board of Directors approved plans to its marketscease operations at our schools in Brockton, Massachusetts and withLowell, Massachusetts which are expected to close in the goalfourth quarter of improving its profitability2017.  These schools, which were previously included in the Healthcare and competitive advantage.  Other Professions segment, are now included in the Transitional segment.

In the past, the Companywe offered any combination of programs at any campus.  The Company has changed itsWe have shifted our focus to program offerings that create greater differentiation among campuses and attain excellence to attract more students and gain market share.  Also, strategically, the Companywe began offering continuing education training to select employers who hire itsour students and this is best achieved at campuses focused on their professions.profession.

As a result of these environmental, market forces and strategic decisions, the Company now operatesWe currently operate in three reportable segments: a) Transportation and Skilled Trades b) Healthcare and Other Professions and c) Transitional which refers to business that is currently being phased out.

The Company’sTransitional.  Our reportable segments have been determined based on a method by which we now evaluate performance and allocate resources.  Each reportable segment representsrepresent a group of post-secondary education providers that offer a variety of degree and non-degree academic programs.  These segments are organized by key market segments to enhance operational alignment within each segment to more effectively execute the Company’sour strategic plan.  Each of the Company’s schools is a reporting unit and an operating segment.  The Company’ssegment which have been determined based on a method by which we evaluate performance and allocate resources.  Our operating segments have been aggregated into three reportable segments because, in the Company’sour judgment, the reporting unitsoperating segments have similar services, types of customers, regulatory environment and economic characteristics.

On November 3, 2015 the Board of Directors approved a plan for the Company to divest 17 of the 18 schools included in the Healthcare and Other Professions business segment.  Then, in December 2015, the Board of Directors approved a plan to cease operations of the remaining school in this segment located in Hartford, Connecticut.  That school is scheduled to close in the fourth quarter of 2016.  Divestiture of the Company’s Healthcare and Other Professions business segment marks a strategic shift in business strategy.  The results of operations of these 17 campuses are reflected as discontinued operations in the consolidated financial statements.  The Hartford, Connecticut campus, which was previously included in the Healthcare and Other Professions segment is now included in the Transitional segment.  Implementation of the plan would result in the Company’s operations focused solely on the Transportation and Skilled Trades segment.

The Company’s two remaining reporting  Our reportable segments are described below.

Transportation and Skilled Trades – Transportation and Skilled Trades offers academic programs mainly in the career-oriented disciplines of transportation and skilled trades (e.g. automotive, diesel, HVAC, welding and manufacturing).

17Healthcare and Other Professions – Healthcare and Other Professions offers academic programs in the career-oriented disciplines of health sciences, hospitality and business and information technology (e.g. dental assistant, medical assistant, practical nursing, culinary arts and cosmetology).


Transitional – Transitional refers to operations that are being phased out or closed and consists of the Company’s Fern Park, Florida and Hartford, Connecticut campuses.  Each school employsour campuses that are currently being taught out.  These schools are employing a gradual teach-out process that enables the schoolschools to continue to operate while current students complete their course of study.  These schools are no longer enrolling new students.  TheDuring the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company announced the closings of our Northeast Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Center City Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and West Palm Beach, Florida facilities.  These schools are expected to be fully taught out on August 31, 2017, August 31, 2017 and September 30, 2017, respectively.  In the first quarter of 2016 we completed the teach-out of our Fern Park, Florida campus wascampus.  Also, in the fourth quarter of 2016, we completed the teach-out of our Hartford, Connecticut and Henderson (Green Valley), Nevada campuses.  In addition, in March 2017, the Board of Directors approved a plan to cease operations at our schools in Brockton, Massachusetts and Lowell, Massachusetts.  These schools are being taught out as of March 31, 2016.  On December 3, 2015, the Company announced it was teaching out the Hartford, Connecticut campus, where the teach-out isand expected to be complete byclosed in December 2016.2017.

The Company continually evaluates all campuses for profitability, earning potential, and customer satisfaction.  This evaluation takes several factors into consideration, including the campus’s geographic location, the programs offered at the campus, as well as skillsets required of our students by their potential employers.  The purpose of this evaluation is to ensure that our programs provide our students with the best possible opportunity to succeed in the marketplace with the goals of attracting more students to our programs and, ultimately, to provide the shareholders with the maximum return on their investment.  Campuses in the Transitional segment have been subject to this process and have been strategically identified for closure.

We evaluate segment performance based on operating results.  Adjustments to reconcile segment results to consolidated results are included under the caption “Corporate,” which primarily includes unallocated corporate activity.

Summary financial information by reporting segment is as follows:

 For the Three Months Ended June 30,  For the Three Months Ended June 30, 
 Revenue  Operating (Loss) Income  Revenue  Operating Income (Loss) 
 2016  
% of
Total
  2015  
% of
Total
  2016  2015  2017  
% of
Total
  2016  
% of
Total
  2017  2016 
Transportation and Skilled Trades $41,032   97.9% $42,447   94.9% $2,431  $2,770  $41,310   66.8% $41,032   60.3% $850  $2,430 
Healthcare and Other Professions  17,932   29.0%  18,661   27.4%  (634)  918 
Transitional  862   2.1%  2,292   5.1%  (1,147)  (1,926)  2,623   4.2%  8,387   12.3%  (833)  (1,458)
Corporate  -   0.0%  -   0.0%  (4,123)  (5,219)  -   0.0%  -   0.0%  (5,414)  (5,123)
Total $41,894   100.0% $44,739   100.0% $(2,839) $(4,375) $61,865   100.0% $68,080   100.0% $(6,031) $(3,233)
                        
 For the Six Months Ended June 30, 
 Revenue  Operating (Loss) Income 
  2016  
% of
Total
   2015  
% of
Total
   2016   2015 
Transportation and Skilled Trades $83,303   97.6% $87,291   94.5% $5,796  $7,745 
Transitional  2,034   2.4%  5,122   5.5%  (4,113)  (3,748)
Corporate  -   0.0%  -   0.0%  (10,846)  (13,208)
Total $85,337   100.0% $92,413   100.0% $(9,163) $(9,211)

 For the Six Months Ended June 30, 
 Total Assets  Revenue  Operating Income (Loss) 
 June 30, 2016  December 31, 2015  2017  
% of
Total
  2016  
% of
Total
  2017  2016 
Transportation and Skilled Trades $85,882  $90,045  $83,477   65.7% $83,304   60.1% $2,898  $5,796 
Healthcare and Other Professions  36,769   28.9%  38,470   27.7%  (474)  2,673 
Transitional  829   1,795   6,898   5.4%  16,950   12.2%  (1,401)  (5,101)
Corporate  46,258   69,999   -   0.0%  -   0.0%  (12,782)  (12,845)
Discontinued Operations  46,029   45,911 
Total $178,998  $207,750  $127,144   100.0% $138,724   100.0% $(11,759) $(9,477)

  Total Assets 
  June 30, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Transportation and Skilled Trades $84,578  $83,320 
Healthcare and Other Professions  7,622   7,506 
Transitional  18,377   18,874 
Corporate  19,654   53,507 
Total $130,231  $163,207 
10.9.FAIR VALUE

The carrying amount and estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instrument assets and liabilities, which are not measured at fair value on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet, are listed in the table below:

 June 30, 2016  At June 30, 2017 
 Carrying  
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
  
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
     Carrying  
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets
  
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
    
 Amount  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total  Amount  (Level 1)  (Level 2)  (Level 3)  Total 
Financial Assets:                              
Cash and cash equivalents $10,950  $10,950  $-  $-  $10,950  $7,210  $7,210  $-  $-  $7,210 
Restricted cash  6,555   6,555   -   -   6,555   6,189   6,189   -   -   6,189 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  2,630   -   2,630   -   2,630   2,586   -   2,586   -   2,586 
Noncurrent restricted cash  20,273   20,273   -   -   20,273 
                                        
Financial Liabilities:                              ��         
Accrued expenses $10,142  $-  $10,142  $-  $10,142  $13,707  $-  $13,707  $-  $13,707 
Other short term liabilities  208   -   208   -   208   464   -   464   -   464 
Term loan  41,510   -   36,009   -   36,009 
Credit facility  32,023   -   32,023   -   32,023 

The fair value of the Term loan is estimated based on a present value analysis utilizing aggregatecredit facility approximates the carrying amount at June 30, 2017 as it relates to current market yields obtained from independent pricing sourcesrates for similar financial instrumentstypes of instruments.

The carrying amounts reported on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for Cash and cash equivalents, Restricted cash and Noncurrent restricted cash approximate fair value because they are highly liquid.

The carrying amounts reported on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets for Prepaid expenses and other current assets, Accrued expenses and Other short term liabilities approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these items.

11.SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 1, 2016, New England Institute of Technology at Palm Beach, Inc. (“NEIT”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a purchase and sale agreement (the “WPB Sale Agreement”) with School Property Development Metrocentre, LLC (“SPD”), pursuant to which NEIT has agreed to sell to SPD the real property owned by NEIT located at 2400 and 2410 Metrocentre Boulevard East, West Palm Beach, Florida, including the improvements and other personal property located thereon  (the “WPB Property”)  for a cash purchase price of approximately $15.9 million.  The WPB Sale Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants and conditions to closing for agreements of this type.

Concurrently with the closing of the sale of the WPB Property and pursuant to the WPB Sale Agreement, NEIT will enter into a short-term lease agreement (the “WPB Lease”) with SPD under which NEIT will lease back the WPB Property for continued use as a school in order to allow the teach-out of currently enrolled students.  The monthly rental obligation under the WPB Lease is $100,000 plus the direct payment by NEIT of all real estate and other taxes and utility charges assessed against the WPB Property.  The term of the WPB Lease will run from the closing date through March 31, 2017, subject to extension at the option of NEIT for three additional months through June 30, 2017.  Upon the closing, as required by the Company’s credit agreement with its lender, the Company will repay, from the net cash proceeds of the sale, $10 million of the principal amount of its term loan, plus a $.5 million prepayment premium and accrued interest on the amount repaid. The Company expects that, assuming all conditions to closing are met, it will close on the sale in the third quarter of 2016.

The foregoing description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the WPB Sale Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.
12.10.RELATED PARTY

The Company has an agreement with MATCO Tools whereby MATCO will provide the Company, on an Advance Commission Basis,advance commission basis, credits in MATCO Brandedbranded tools, tool storage, equipment, and diagnostics products. The CEOchief executive officer of the parent Company of MATCO is considered an immediate family member of one of the Company’s board members.  The Company’s payable balances from this third party was immaterial at June 30, 20162017 and 2015.2016. Management believes that such transactions are at arm’s length and on similar terms as would have been obtained from unaffiliated third parties.
 
Item 2.
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion may contain forward-looking statements regarding the Company, our business, prospects and our results of operations that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties posed by many factors and events that could cause our actual business, prospects and results of operations to differ materially from those that may be anticipated by such forward-looking statements.  Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, those described in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in our other filings with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.  We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may subsequently arise.  Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the SEC that advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business.

The interim financial statements and related notes thereto filed in this Form 10-Q and the discussions contained herein should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and notes included in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, as filed with the SEC, which includes audited consolidated financial statements for our three fiscal years ended December 31, 2015.2016.

General

Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”, “we”, “our” and “us”, as applicable) provide diversified career-oriented post-secondary education to recent high school graduates and working adults.  The Company, which currently operates 3028 schools in 15 states, offers programs in automotive technology, skilled trades (which include HVAC, welding and computerized numerical control and electronic systems technology, among other programs), healthcare services (which include nursing, dental assistant, medical administrative assistant and pharmacy technician, among other programs), hospitality services (which include culinary, therapeutic massage, cosmetology and aesthetics) and business and information technology (which includes information technology and criminal justice programs).  The schools operate under the Lincoln Technical Institute, Lincoln College of Technology, Lincoln College of New England, Lincoln Culinary Institute, and Euphoria Institute of Beauty Arts and Sciences and associated brand names.  Most of the campuses serve major metropolitan markets and each typically offers courses in multiple areas of study.  Five of the campuses are destination schools, which attract students from across the United States and, in some cases, from abroad. The Company’s other campuses primarily attract students from their local communities and surrounding areas.  All of the campuses are nationally or regionally accredited and are eligible to participate in federal financial aid programs by the U.S. Department of Education (the “DOE”) and applicable state education agencies and accrediting commissions which allow students to apply for and access federal student loans as well as other forms of financial aid.

In the first quarter of 2015, we reorganized our operations into three reportable business segments:  (a) Transportation and Skilled Trades, (b) Healthcare and Other Professions (“HOPS”), and (c) Transitional which refers to businesses that have been or are currently being phasedtaught out.  InIn November 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a plan for the Company to divest 17 of 18 of the schools included in its Healthcare and Other Professionsthe HOPS segment due to a strategic shift in the Company’s business segment.  Then,strategy.  The Company underwent an exhaustive process to divest the HOPS schools which proved successful in December 2015,attracting various purchasers but, ultimately, did not result in a transaction that our Board believed would enhance shareholder value. When the decision was first made by the Board of Directors approvedto divest HOPS, 18 campuses were operating in this segment.  By the end of 2017, we will have strategically closed seven underperforming campuses leaving a total of 11 campuses remaining under HOPS.   The Company believes that the closures and planned closures of the aforementioned campuses has positioned this segment and the Company to be more profitable going forward as well as maximizing returns for the Company’s shareholders.

The combination of several factors, including the inability of the prospective buyer of the HOPS segment to close on the purchase, the improvements the Company has implemented in the HOPS operations, the closure of seven underperforming campuses and the change in Federal government administration, resulted in the Board reevaluating its divestiture plan and the determination that shareholder value would more likely be enhanced by continuing to operate our HOPS segment as revitalized.  Consequently, the Board of Directors has abandoned the plan to cease operations ofdivest the remaining schools inHOPS segment and the Healthcare and Other Professions segment in Hartford, Connecticut.  That school is scheduledCompany now intends to close inretain the fourth quarter of 2016.  Implementation of the plan would result in the Company’s operations focused solely on the Transportation and Skilled TradesHOPS segment.  This divestiture marks a shift in our business strategy will enable us to focus energy and resources predominantly on Transportation and Skilled Trades though some other programs will continue to be available at some campuses.  The results of operations of the 17 campuses slated for divestitureincluded in the HOPS business segment are reflected as discontinuedcontinuing operations in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

AsIn the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company completed the teach-out of its Hartford, Connecticut and Henderson (Green Valley), Nevada campuses.  Also in 2016, the Company announced the closing of its Northeast Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Center City Philadelphia Pennsylvania and West Palm Beach, Florida facilities, each of which is expected to be fully taught out and closed during 2017.  In addition, in March 2017, the Board of Directors approved a plan to not renew the leases at our schools in Brockton, Massachusetts and Lowell, Massachusetts.  These schools, which are being taught out and expected to be closed in December 2017, are included in the Transitional segment as of June 30, 2016, we had 11,417 students enrolled at 30 campuses in our programs (7,041 students enrolled at 13 campuses that are included in continuing operations).2017.

Subsequent Events
20


On July 1, 2016, New England Institute of Technology at Palm Beach, Inc. (“NEIT”), a wholly-owned subsidiary ofMarch 14, 2017, the Company entered into a purchase and sale agreement (the “WPB Sale Agreement”) with School Property Development Metrocentre,Tambone Companies, LLC, (“SPD”), pursuant to which NEITthe Company has agreed to sell to SPDTambone Companies, LLC two of the real property owned by NEIT located at 2400 and 2410 Metrocentre Boulevard East,three facilities it owns in West Palm Beach, Florida, including the improvements and other personal property located thereon (the “WPB“West Palm Beach Property”) for a cash purchase price of approximately $15.9$15.7 million. The WPB Sale Agreement containspurchase and sale agreement, as amended, is among other things, subject to customary representations, warranties, covenants and conditionsclosing conditions.  The Company expects to closing for agreementsclose on the transaction in the third quarter of this type.
Concurrently with2017. On April 28, 2017, the closingCompany obtained from its lender, Sterling National Bank, an $8 million bridge term loan secured by the West Palm Beach Property.  The bridge loan must be repaid upon the earlier of the sale of the WPBWest Palm Beach Property and pursuant toor October 1, 2017.

On March 31, 2017, the WPB Sale Agreement, NEIT will enterCompany entered into a short-term lease agreement (the “WPB Lease”)new revolving credit facility with SPD underSterling National Bank in the aggregate principal amount of up to $55 million, which NEIT will lease backconsists of up to $50 million of revolving loans, including a $10 million sublimit for letters of credit, and an additional $5 million non-revolving loan.  The new credit facility requires that revolving loans in excess of $25 million and all letters of credit issued thereunder be cash collateralized dollar for dollar.  The proceeds of the WPB Property for continued use$5 million non-revolving loan were held in a pledged account at Sterling National Bank as required by the terms of the new credit facility pending the completion of environmental studies undertaken at certain properties owned by the Company and mortgaged to Sterling National Bank.  Upon the completion of environmental studies that revealed that no environmental issues existed at the properties, during the quarter ended June 30, 2017, the $5 million held in the pledged account at Sterling National Bank was released and used to repay the $5 million non-revolving loan.  The new revolving credit facility replaces a school in order to allowterm loan facility from a lender group led by HPF Service, LLC, which was repaid and terminated concurrently with the teach-outeffectiveness of currently enrolled students.  The monthly rental obligation under the WPB Lease is $100,000 plus the direct payment by NEIT of all real estate and other taxes and utility charges assessed against the WPB Property.new revolving credit facility.  The term of the WPB Lease will run fromnew revolving credit facility is 38 months, maturing on May 31, 2020.  The new revolving credit facility is discussed in further detail under the closing date through March 31, 2017, subjectheading “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below and in Note 4 to extension at the optioncondensed consolidated financial statements included in this report. 

As of NEIT for three additional months through June 30, 2017.  Upon the closing, as required by the Company’s credit agreement with its lender, the Company will repay, from the net cash proceeds of the sale, $10 million of the principal amount of its term loan, plus a $.5 million prepayment premium and accrued interest on the amount repaid. The Company expects that, assuming all conditions to closing are met, it will close on the sale2017, we had 10,400 students enrolled at 28 campuses in the third quarter of 2016.our programs.

The foregoing description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the WPB Sale Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Discontinued Operations

The results of operations at the 17 campuses slated for divestiture, as discussed above, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (in thousands):

  Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2016  2015  2016  2015 
Revenue $26,186  $27,654  $53,387  $56,700 
                 
Loss before income tax  (413)  (2,010)  (352)  (2,751)
Income tax benefit  -   -   -   - 
Net loss from discontinued operations $(413) $(2,010) $(352) $(2,751)

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussions of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).  The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period.  On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions, including those related to revenue recognition, bad debts, impairments, income taxes, benefit plans and certain accruals.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  The critical accounting policies discussed herein are not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies.  In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by GAAP and does not result in significant management judgment in the application of such principles.  We believe that the following accounting policies are most critical to us in that they represent the primary areas where financial information is subject to the application of management’s estimates, assumptions and judgment in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition.  Revenues are derived primarily from programs taught at the Company’sour schools.  Tuition revenues, textbook sales and one-time fees, such as nonrefundable application fees and course material fees, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the length of the applicable program as the student proceeds through the program, which is the period of time from a student’s start date through his or her graduation date, including internships or externships that take place prior to graduation, and the Company completeswe complete the performance of teaching the student which entitles the Companyus to the revenue.   Other revenues, such as tool sales and contract training revenues are recognized as services are performed or goods are delivered. On an individual student basis, tuition earned in excess of cash received is recorded as accounts receivable, and cash received in excess of tuition earned is recorded as unearned tuition.
The Company evaluatesWe evaluate whether collectability of revenue is reasonably assured prior to the student attending class and reassessesreassess collectability of tuition and fees when a student withdraws from a course.  The Company calculatesWe calculate the amount to be returned under Title IV and its stated refund policy to determine eligible charges.  Ifcharges and, if there is a balance due from the student after this calculation, the Company expectswe expect payment from the student and the Company haswe have a process to pursue uncollected accounts whereby, based upon the student’s financial means and ability to pay, a payment plan is established with the student to ensure that collectability is reasonably assured.  The Companyreasonable.  We continuously monitors itsmonitor our historical collections to identify potential trends that may impact our determination that collectability of receivables for withdrawn students is realizable.  If a student withdraws from a program prior to a specified date, any paid but unearned tuition is refunded. Refunds are calculated and paid in accordance with federal, state and accrediting agency standards. Generally, the amount to be refunded to a student is calculated based upon the period of time the student has attended classes and the amount of tuition and fees paid by the student as of his or her withdrawal date. These refunds typically reduce deferred tuition revenue and cash on our consolidated balance sheets as the Companywe generally doesdo not recognize tuition revenue in itsour consolidated statements of income (loss) until the related refund provisions have lapsed. Based on the application of itsour refund policies, the Companywe may be entitled to incremental revenue on the day the student withdraws from one of itsour schools. Prior to the year-ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded this incremental revenue, any related student receivable and any estimate of the amount it did not expect to collect as bad debt expense during the quarter a student withdrew based on its analysis of the collectability of such amounts on an aggregate student portfolio basis, for which the Company had significant historical experience. Beginning in the three months ended December 31 2015, the Company recordedWe record revenue for students who withdraw from one of itsour schools when payment is received because collectability on an individual student basis is not reasonably assured. The Company determined incremental revenue recognized for students who withdrew during the nine-months ended September 30, 2015 to be an immaterial error which was corrected during the fourth quarter of 2015. This resulted in a reduction of net revenues by $0.3 million and bad debt expense by $0.2 million, which resulted in an increase to the loss from continuing operations of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Additionally, this correction reduced net student receivables from continuing operations by $0.1 million.  Prior year amounts, including quarterly financial results were not restated because the effects were not material.

Allowance for uncollectible accounts.  Based upon our experience and judgment, we establish an allowance for uncollectible accounts with respect to tuition receivables.  We use an internal group of collectors, augmented by third-party collectors as deemed appropriate, in our collection efforts.  In establishing our allowance for uncollectible accounts, we consider, among other things, current and expected economic conditions, a student’s status (in-school or out-of-school), whether or not a student is currently making payments and overall collection history.  Changes in trends in any of these areas may impact the allowance for uncollectible accounts.  The receivables balances of withdrawn students with delinquent obligations are reserved based on our collection history.  Although we believe that our reserves are adequate, if the financial condition of our students deteriorates, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be necessary, which will result in increased selling, general and administrative expenses in the period such determination is made.

Our bad debt expense as a percentage of revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was 6.6% and 2015 was 5.2% and 6.3%4.8%, respectively.  Our bad debt expense as a percentage of revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 was 5.7% and 2015 was 5.1% and 5.6%4.7%, respectively.  The improvement in our bad debt was mainly the result of improved historical collection rates and shift in student mix.  Our exposure to changes in our bad debt expense could impact our operations.  A 1% increase in our bad debt expense as a percentage of revenues for each of the three months ended June 201630, 2017 and 20152016 would have resulted in an increase in bad debt expense of $0.4$0.6 million and $0.4$0.7 million, respectively.  A 1% increase in our bad debt expense as a percentage of revenues for each of the six months ended June 201630, 2017 and 20152016 would have resulted in an increase in bad debt expense of $0.9$1.3 million and $0.9$1.4 million, respectively.

We do not believe that there is any direct correlation between tuition increases, the credit we extend to students, and our loan commitments.  Our loan commitments to our students are made on a student-by-student basis and are predominantly a function of the specific student’s financial condition.   We only extend credit to the extent there is a financing gap between the tuition charged for the program and the amount of grants, cash,student loans and parental loans that each student receives.receives and the availability of family contributions.  Each student’s funding requirements are unique.  Factors that determine the amount of aid available to a student are student status (whether they are dependent or independent students), Pell Grants awarded, Plus Loans awarded or denied to parents, and family contributions. As a result, it is extremely difficult to predict the number of students that will need us to extend credit to them. Our tuition increases have ranged historically from 2% to 5% annually and have not meaningfully impacted overall funding requirements.

Because a substantial portion of our revenue is derived from Title IV programs, any legislative or regulatory action that significantly reduces the funding available under Title IV programs or the ability of our students or schools to participate in Title IV programs could have a material effect on the realizability of our receivables.

Goodwill.  We test our goodwill for impairment annually, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred, by comparing its fair value to its carrying value. Impairment may result from, among other things, deterioration in the performance of the acquired business, adverse market conditions, adverse changes in applicable laws or regulations, including changes that restrict the activities of the acquired business, and a variety of other circumstances. If we determine that impairment has occurred, we are required to record a write-down of the carrying value and charge the impairment as an operating expense in the period the determination is made. In evaluating the recoverability of the carrying value of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets, we must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and other factors to determine the fair value of the acquired assets. Changes in strategy or market conditions could significantly impact these judgments in the future and require an adjustment to the recorded balances.

There was no goodwill impairment duringfor the three and six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 2015.2016.
Long-lived assets.  We review the carrying value of our long-lived assets and identifiable intangibles for possible impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We evaluate long-lived assets for impairment by examining estimated future cash flows. These cash flows are evaluated by using weighted probability techniques as well as comparisons of past performance against projections. Assets may also be evaluated by identifying independent market values. If we determine that an asset’s carrying value is impaired, we will record a write-down of the carrying value of the asset and charge the impairment as an operating expense in the period in which the determination is made.

There was no long-lived asset impairment during the three and six months ended June 30 20162017 and 2015.2016.

Bonus costsWe accrue the estimated cost of our bonus programs using current financial information as compared to target financial achievements and key performance objectives.  Although our recorded liability for bonuses is based on our best estimate of the obligation, actual results could differ and require adjustment of the recorded balance.

Income taxes. We account for income taxes in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Code (“ASC”) Topic 740, “Income Taxes” (“ASC 740”). This statement requires an asset and liability approach for measuring deferred taxes based on temporary differences between the financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities existing at each balance sheet date using enacted tax rates for years in which taxes are expected to be paid or recovered.
 
In accordance with ASC 740, we assess our deferred tax asset to determine whether all or any portion of the asset is more likely than not unrealizable.  A valuation allowance is required to be established or maintained when, based on currently available information, it is more likely than not that all or a portion of a deferred tax asset will not be realized. In accordance with ASC 740, our assessment considers whether there has been sufficient income in recent years and whether sufficient income is expected in future years in order to utilize the deferred tax asset. In evaluating the realizability of deferred income tax assets, we considered, among other things, historical levels of income, expected future income, the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary reporting differences, and the expected impact of tax planning strategies that may be implemented to prevent the potential loss of future income tax benefits. Significant judgment is required in determining the future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our consolidated financial statements and/or tax returns.  Differences between anticipated and actual outcomes of these future tax consequences could have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.  Changes in, among other things, income tax legislation, statutory income tax rates, or future income levels could materially impact our valuation of income tax assets and liabilities and could cause our income tax provision to vary significantly among financial reporting periods.  On the basis of this evaluation the realization of our deferred tax assets was not deemed to be more likely than not and thus we have provided a valuation allowance on our net deferred tax assets.
 
We recognize accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense.  During the three and six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, there were no interest and penalties expense associated with uncertain tax positions.

Effect of Inflation

Inflation has not had a material effect on our operations.
Results of Continuing Operations

Certain reported amounts in our analysis have been rounded for presentation purposes.  The following table sets forth selected consolidated statements of continuing operations data as a percentage of revenues for each of the periods indicated:

 
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
Three Months Ended
June 30,
  
Six Months Ended
June 30,
 
 2016  2015  2016  2015  2017  2016  2017  2016 
Revenue  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%
Costs and expenses:                                
Educational services and facilities  51.7%  50.3%  52.5%  49.2%  52.4%  52.2%  51.2%  52.4%
Selling, general and administrative  55.1%  59.4%  58.7%  60.9%  57.5%  52.5%  58.1%  54.7%
Gain on sale of assets  0.0%  0.0%  -0.5%  0.0%  -0.1%  0.0%  -0.1%  -0.3%
Total costs and expenses  106.8%  109.8%  110.7%  110.0%  109.8%  104.7%  109.2%  106.8%
Operating loss  -6.8%  -9.8%  -10.7%  -10.0%  -9.8%  -4.7%  -9.2%  -6.8%
Interest expense, net  -3.6%  -3.4%  -3.6%  -3.2%  -1.0%  -2.3%  -4.6%  -2.2%
Other income  4.0%  0.8%  4.0%  0.6%  0.0%  2.5%  0.0%  2.5%
Loss from continuing operations before income taxes  -6.4%  -12.4%  -10.3%  -12.6%
Loss from operations before income taxes  -10.8%  -4.5%  -13.8%  -6.5%
Provision for income taxes  0.1%  0.1%  0.1%  0.1%  0.1%  0.1%  0.1%  0.1%
Loss from continuing operations  -6.5%  -12.5%  -10.4%  -12.7%
Net Loss  -10.9%  -4.6%  -13.9%  -6.6%

Three Months Ended June 30, 20162017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 20152016

Consolidated Results of Operations

Revenue.   Revenue decreased by $2.8$6.2 million, or 6.4%9.1%, to $41.9$61.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 20162017 from $44.7$68.1 million in the prior comparable period of 2015.  The decrease was a result of starting 2016 with approximately 800 fewer students than we had on January 1, 2015 which led to a 9.6% decline in average student population to approximately 6,600 as of June 30, 2016 from 7,300 as of June 30 offor the prior year comparable quarter.  Student start results for the quarter stabilized compared to the comparable quarter in the prior year.  For the three months ended June 30, 2016, starts decreased by 0.5% compared to the same period in 2015. This was an improvement in comparison to the decline of approximately 10% during the same period in 2015 compared to the comparable quarter in 2014.  Excluding the Transitional segment, the Company experienced a slight growth in starts to 1,936 for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 compared to 1,930 for the second quarter of 2015.

Partially offsetting theperiod.  The decrease in revenue was an increaseis mainly attributable to the suspension of 3.5%new student starts at campuses in our Transitional segment, which accounted for approximately 93% of the total revenue decline; and a 3.4% decline in average revenue per student in the Healthcare and Other Professions segment due to shifts in program mix combined with tuition rate decreases in various programs.
Total student starts decreased by 16.1% to approximately 2,600 from 3,100 for the three months ended June 30, 20162017 as compared to the prior year comparable period.  The decrease was largely due to a shift in program mix.

We continuethe suspension of new student starts for the Transitional segment which is down 100% as compared to face certain challenges in growing our student population levels including the impact Department of Education (“DOE”) incentive compensation regulations have on compensation practices for our admissions representatives, a low national unemployment rateprior year comparable quarter.   The Transportation and increased competition from peersSkilled Trades segment starts were down 9.0% and community colleges.  We remain focused on our strategy to fully divest ourthe Healthcare and Other Professions segment starts were up 2.7% for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year comparable period.

Starts in the Transportation and continueSkilled Trades segment were down for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as a result of lower than expected high school start rates.  The shortfall occurred primarily at three campuses and was directly attributable to form partnership relationshipsaffordability and sustainability of student engagement between enrollment and start date.  Sustaining student engagement following enrollment, especially when the enrollment occurs months in advance, requires constant contact.  In addition, in striving to find the optimum affordability balance, the Company experienced a start decline in markets where scholarships were scaled back.  Certain external factors that are also driving the softer than expected start rate include low unemployment rates and increased wages for both skilled and unskilled labor.  The Company believes such external factors have caused many potential students to postpone training and enter the workforce directly upon graduation from high school.  Further, contributing to the decline in high school student starts is the lead time between the initial recruitment efforts and the actual start date, which could be up to one year.  High school students comprise approximately 30% of the segment’s population.  In an effort to increase high school enrollments, the Company has made various changes to processes and organizational structure.  As a result, enrollments for the quarter remained essentially flat; however, as noted above starts declined.

For a general discussion of trends in our student population.enrollment, see “Seasonality and Outlook” below.

Educational services and facilities expense.   Our educational services and facilities expense decreased by $0.8$3.2 million, or 3.7%8.9%, to $21.7$32.4 million for the three months endingended June 30, 20162017 from $22.5$35.6 million in the prior year comparable period.

The expense reductions were primarily duequarter.  This decrease is mainly attributable to a decrease of $0.6 million in instructional, books and tools expense driven by lower instructional expenses of $0.8 million, or 7.8%, as a result of a reduction in the number of instructors and other related costs resulting from lower average student population, partially offset by a $0.2 million, or 13.1% increase in books and tools expense incurred from the purchase of laptops which were provided to newly enrolled students in certain programs to enhance and expand the student overall learning experience.

Our facilities expense decreased by $0.3 million, or 2.8%, resulting from two main factors. The first factor is a general reduction in facilities costs due to (a) the closure of the Fern Park, Florida campus during the first quarter of 2016; (b) the over 300,000 square foot reduction at the Hartford, Connecticut campus, which is scheduled to be taught-out by year-end; and (c) lower rent expense as a result of certain lease renegotiations. These savings were largely offset by increased rent expense resulting from the modification of a lease at three of our campuses which were previously accounted for as finance obligations under which rent payments were previously included in interest expense and the conversion of the lease for our Hartford, Connecticut campus from a capital lease to an operating lease during the first quarter of 2016.  The second factor is a decrease in depreciation expense of approximately $0.2 million, or 7.8%, as a result of accelerated depreciation expense in 2015 in connection with the Transitional segment which accounted for $3.1 million in cost reductions as campuses partially offset by additional depreciation expense in 2016 as a result of the reclassification of two facilities out of held for sale as of December 31, 2015.segment prepare to close during this fiscal year.

Our educational expenses contain a high fixed cost component and are not as scalable as some of our other expenses.  As our student population decreases, we typically experience a reduction in average class size and therefore, are not always able to align these expenses with the corresponding decrease in population.  Educational services and facilities expenses, as a percentage of revenue increased to 51.7%remained essentially flat at 52.4% for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from 50.3%52.2% in the prior year comparable period.

Selling, general and administrative expense.    Our selling, general and administrative expense decreased by $3.5$0.2 million, or 13.2%0.6%, to $23.1$35.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 20162017 from $26.6$35.8 million in the prior comparable periodquarter of 2015.2016.  The decrease was primarily due to the Transitional segment, which accounted for approximately $3.2 million in cost reductions as campuses in the segment prepare to close during this fiscal year.  Partially offsetting the cost reductions are $2.0 million in increased administrative costs and $1.3 million in additional sales and marketing expense.

Administrative expense was lower by $2.8increased primarily due to a $0.9 million or 18.6%,increase in bad debt expense as a result of approximately $1.3 million in reduced salarieshigher student accounts receivable, higher account write-offs, and benefit costs mainly due to lower healthcare claims, cost savingstiming of $0.4 million in connection with the closure of the Fern Park, Florida facility during the first quarter of 2016,Title IV funds receipts; and a $0.6 decrease$1.0 million increase in bad debt expense whichmedical costs as a percentage of revenue was 5.2%. The improvementcompared to the prior year.  In 2016, the Company had historically low medical claims as compared to medical claims in bad debt expense was mainly the result of improved historical collection rates and shiftcurrent year, resulting in student mix.the significant increase quarter over quarter.

Sales and marketing expense decreasedincreased by $0.4$1.3 million, or 4.9%10.8%, asfrom strategic marketing initiatives intended to reach more students. These initiatives resulted in a result of a reduction of $0.5 millionslight improvement in sales expense partially offset by an increase in marketing spending of $0.1 million. The reduction in sales expense was mainly attributable to a reductionstarts in the number of admissions representatives dedicated to the destination schools as a result of our implementation of a centralized call center which also reduced travel expense.

Student services expense decreased by $0.2 million, or 10.4%, as a result of aligning support services with lower levels of population.adult demographic quarter over quarter.

As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expense decreasedincreased to 55.1%57.5% for the quarterthree months ended June 30, 20162017 from 59.4% for52.5% in the quarter ended June 30, 2015.comparable prior year period.

Net interest expense. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, our2017 net interest expense remained essentially flat atdecreased by $0.8 million, or 55% to $0.7 million from $1.5 million.  There was an increasemillion in our interest expense of $1 million primarily resultingthe prior year comparable period.  The cost reductions resulted from favorable terms under our new Credit Agreement, which was offsetFacility with Sterling National Bank effective on March 31, 2017.

Other Income.  For the three months ended June 30, 2017 other income decreased by $1.7 million from the transitionprior year comparable period.  The $1.7 million of our finance obligationother income in 2016 reflected the amortization of a one-time gain from the modification of a lease at three of ourthe Company’s campuses to operating leases coupled with the lease termination agreements for our Fern Park, Florida and Hartford, Connecticut facilities which were previously accounted for as capital leases.finance obligations in the prior year.

Income taxes.    Our provision for income taxes was $0.1 million, or 1.9%0.7% of pretax loss, infor the second quarter of 2016,three months ended June 30, 2017, compared to $0.1 million, or 0.9%1.6% of pretax loss, in the prior year comparable period. No federal or state income tax benefit was recognized for the current period loss due to the recognition of a full valuation allowance.  Income tax expense resulted from various minimal state tax expenses.

Six Months Ended June 30, 20162017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 20152016

Consolidated Results of Operations

Revenue.   Revenue decreased by $7.1$11.6 million, or 7.7%8.3%, to $85.3$127.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 20162017 from $92.4$138.7 million infor the prior year comparable period of 2015.period.  The decrease wasin revenue is mainly attributable to the suspension of new student enrollments at campuses in our Transitional segment, which accounted for approximately 87% of the total revenue decline; and a result of starting 2016 with approximately 800 fewer students than we had on January 1, 2015. This led to a 10.8%2.7% decline in average revenue per student populationin the Healthcare and Other Professions segment due to shifts in program mix combined with tuition rate decreases in various programs.
Total student starts decreased by 13.8% to approximately 6,700 as of June 30, 20165,500 from 7,500 as of June 30 in the prior year.  Excluding the Transitional segment, starts were lower by 3.3% during the first half of 2016 compared to the first half of 2015.

Although 2016 average student population continues to be negatively impacted by the beginning of year population, start declines have slowed down as evidenced by the results6,300 for the six months ended June 30, 20162017 as compared to the prior year comparable periods.  Starts forperiod.  The decrease was largely due to the first six months in 2016 were lower by 5.7% when compared to 2015, whilesuspension of new student starts for the first half of 2015 declined 8.5% as compared to the comparable period in 2014.

Partially offsetting the decrease in revenue was an increase of 3.4% in average revenue per studentTransitional segment which had 132 students for the six months ended June 30, 2016 due2017 as compared to a shift806 students in program mix.

We continue to face certain challenges in growing our student population levels, including the impact that DOE incentive compensation regulations have on compensation practices for our admissions representatives, a low national unemployment rateprior year comparable period.   The Transportation and increased competition from peersSkilled Trades segment starts were down 3.1% and community colleges.  We remain focused on our strategy to fully divest ourthe Healthcare and Other Professions segment starts were down 4.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year comparable period.
Starts in the Transportation and continueSkilled Trades segment were down for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as a result of lower than expected high school start rates.  The shortfall occurred mainly at three campuses and was directly attributable to form partnership relationshipsaffordability and sustainability of student engagement between enrollment and start date.  Sustaining student engagement following enrollment, especially when enrollment occurs months in advance, requires constant contact.  In addition, in striving to find the optimum affordability balance the Company experienced a start decline in markets where scholarships were scaled back.  Certain external factors that are also driving the softer than expected start rate include low unemployment rates and increased wages for both skilled and unskilled labor.  The Company believes such external factors have caused many potential students to postpone training and enter the workforce directly upon graduation from high school.  Further, contributing to the decline in high school student starts is the lead time between the initial recruitment efforts and the actual start date, which could be up to one year.  High school students comprise approximately 30% of the segment’s population.  In an effort to increase high school enrollments, the Company has made various changes to processes and organizational structure.  As a result, enrollments for the quarter remained essentially flat; however, as noted above, starts declined.
For a general discussion of trends in our student population.enrollment, see “Seasonality and Outlook” below.

Educational services and facilities expense.   Our educational services and facilities expense decreased by $0.6$7.6 million, or 1.3%10.4%, to $44.8$65.1 million for the six months endingended June 30, 20162017 from $45.4$72.7 million in the prior year comparable period.
The  This decrease is mainly attributable to the Transitional segment which accounted for $7.1 million in expense was primarily due to a $1.7 million, or 7.9%, reduction in our instructional expensescost reductions as a result of a reductioncampuses in the number of instructors and other related costs resulting from lower average student population, partially offset by an increase of $0.3 million in books and tools expense resulting from the purchase of laptops which were providedsegment prepare to newly enrolled students in certain programs to enhance and expand their overall learning experience.close during this fiscal year.

Our facilities expense increased by $0.7 million, or 3.6% resulting from a) additional depreciation expense as a result of the reclassification of two campus out of held for sale as of December 31, 2015; b) increased rent expense resulting from the modification of a lease at three of our campuses which were previously accounted for as finance obligations under which rent payments were previously included in interest expense; and c) the conversion of the lease for our Hartford, Connecticut campus from a capital lease to an operating lease during the quarter ended March 31, 2016.

Our educational expenses contain a high fixed cost component and are not as scalable as some of our other expenses.  As our student population decreases, we typically experience a reduction in average class size and, therefore, are not always able to align these expenses with the corresponding decrease in population.  Educational services and facilities expenses, as a percentage of revenue increaseddecreased to 52.5%51.2% for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from 49.2%.52.4% in the prior year comparable period.

Selling, general and administrative expense.    Our selling, general and administrative expense decreased by $6.1$2.0 million, or 10.9%2.7%, to $50.1$73.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 20162017 from $56.2$75.9 million in the prior year comparable period.period of 2016.  The decrease was primarily due to the Transitional segment, which accounted for approximately $6.6 million in cost reductions as campuses in the segment prepare to close during this fiscal year.  Partially offsetting these costs reductions are $2.3 million in increased administrative expense; and $2.6 million in additional sales and marketing expense.

Administrative expense was lower by $4.4increased primarily due to a $1.5 million or 13.6%,increase in bad debt expense as a result of (a)higher student accounts receivable, higher account write-offs, and timing of Title IV funds receipts; and a $2.6$1.0 million reductionincrease in salaries and benefitmedical costs mainly due to lower healthcare claims, which was partially offset by approximately $0.7 million in severance paid during the first quarter of 2016; (b) cost savings of $0.7 million in relationas compared to the completion ofprior year.  In 2016, the teach-out at our Fern Park, Florida campus; and (c) a $0.8 decreaseCompany had historically low medical claims as compared to this year resulting in bad debt expense which as a percentage of revenue was 5.1%the significant increase for the six months ended June 30, 2016,2017 as compared to 5.6% for the same period in 2015.  The improvement in bad debt expense was mainly the result of improved historical collection rates and shift in student mix.prior comparable period.

Sales and marketing expenses decreasedexpense increased by $1.4$2.6 million, or 7.0%10.4%, primarily as a result of a reduction of $1$2.0 million in salesincreased marketing expense, in combination with a decrease in marketing expense of $0.4 million. The reductionan increase in sales expensespending of $0.6 million.  Increased marketing spend was mainly attributablepart of a strategic marketing initiatives intended to reach more students. These initiatives resulted in a reductionslight improvement in starts in the number of admissions representatives dedicatedadult demographic for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the destination schools as a result of our implementation of a centralized call center reducing travel and salary expense.  The decrease in marketing expense is largely the result of suspended marketing efforts at the Fern Park, Florida and Hartford, Connecticut campuses.  The Fern Park, Florida campus completed its teach out process as of March 31, 2016 and the Hartford, Connecticut campus is still on schedule to be fully taught out by December 31, 2016.prior comparable period.

Student services expense decreased by $0.4 million, or 8.4%, as a result of aligning support services with lower levels of population.

As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and administrative expense decreasedincreased to 58.7%58.1% for the six months ended June 30, 20162017 from 60.8%54.7% in the comparable prior year period.
As of June 30, 2017, we had total outstanding loan commitments to our students of $42.2 million, as compared to $40.0 million at December 31, 2016.  Loan commitments, net of interest that would be due on the loans through maturity, were $31.4 million at June 30, 2017, as compared to $30.0 million at December 31, 2016.  The increase in loan commitments was due in part to the seasonality of the Company’s operations.  Students that miss the fall enrollments in the third and fourth quarter typically start in the first and second quarter of the new year.  Students requiring additional subsidy for tuition increased 6.1% to approximately 6,200 for the priorsix months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to approximately 5,900 for the year comparable period.ended December 31, 2016.

Gain on sale of assets.  Gain on sale of fixed assets decreased by $0.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 primarily as a result of the sale of certain of the Company’s assets during the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Net interest expense. For the six months ended June 30, 2016 our2017 net interest expense remained essentially flat at $3 million.  Thereincreased by 2.8 million, or 91% to $5.8 million from $3.1 million in the prior year comparable period.  The increase was an increase in our interest expensemainly attributable to a $2.2 million non-cash write-off of $1.8 primarily resulting from our new Term Loan, which was offset bypreviously capitalized deferred financing fees; and $1.7 million of additional costs relating to the transitionearly retirement of our finance obligationprevious term loan.  These costs were incurred at March 31, 2017 when the Company entered into a new revolving credit facility with Sterling National Bank.

Other Income.  For the six months ended June 30, 2017 other income decreased by $3.4 million from the prior year comparable period.  The $3.4 million in 2016 reflected the amortization of a one-time gain from the modification of a lease at three of ourthe Company’s campuses to operating leases coupled with the lease termination agreements for the Fern Park, Florida and Hartford, Connecticut facilities which were previously accounted for as capital leases.finance obligations in the prior year.

Income taxes.    Our provision for income taxes was $0.1 million, or 1.1%0.6% of pretax loss, for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2016,2017, compared to $0.1 million, or 0.9%1.1% of pretax loss, in the prior year comparable period. No federal or state income tax benefit was recognized for the current period loss due to the recognition of a full valuation allowance.  Income tax expense resulted from various minimal state tax expenses.

Segment Results of Operations

The for-profit education industry has been impacted by numerous regulatory changes, the changing economy and an onslaught of negative media attention. As a result of these actions, student populations have declined and operating costs have increased.  Over the past few years, the Company has closed over ten locations and exited its online business.  On November 3, 2015,In 2016, the Company’sCompany ceased operations in Hartford, Connecticut; Fern Park, Florida; and Henderson (Green Valley), Nevada. In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Board of Directors approved a planplans to divest 17cease operations at our schools in Center City Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Northeast Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; and West Palm Beach, Florida.  Each of the 18these schools includedis expected to close in the Company’s Healthcare and Other Professions business segment.  The 17 campuses associated with this decision are reported2017.  In addition, in discontinued operations onMarch 2017, the condensed consolidated statements of operations.   On December 3, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a planplans to cease operations at the remaining schoolour schools in this segment, located in Hartford, Connecticut,Brockton, Massachusetts and Lowell, Massachusetts, which is scheduledare expected to be taught outclose in the fourth quarter of 2016.   The Company reviewed how it is structured2017.  These schools, which were previously included in the Healthcare and changed its organization, including reorganizing its Group Presidents to oversee each ofOther Professions segment, are now included in the reporting segments.  By aggregating the remaining 14 operating segments (Fern Park, Florida campus was fully taught out as of March 31, 2016) into two reporting segments, the Company is better able to allocate financial and human resources to respond to its markets with the goal of improving its profitability and competitive advantage.Transitional segment.
In the past, we offered any combination of programs at any campus.  We have changedshifted our focus to program offerings that create greater differentiation among campuses and attain excellence to attract more students and gain market share.  Also, strategically, we began offering continuing education training to select employers who hire our students and this is best achieved at campuses focused on their profession.

As a result of these environmental,the regulatory environment, market forces and strategic decisions, we now operate our business in twothree reportable segments: a) Transportation and Skilled TradesTrades; b) Healthcare and b)Other Professions; and c) Transitional.

Our reportable segments have been determined based on a method by which we now evaluate performance and allocate resources.  Each reportable segment represents a group of post-secondary education providers that offer a variety of degree and non-degree academic programs.  These segments are organized by key market segments to enhance operational alignment within each segment to more effectively execute our strategic plan.  Each of the Company’s schools is a reporting unit and an operating segment.  Our operating segments have been aggregated into twothe three reportable segments because, in our judgment, the reporting units have similar services, types of customers, regulatory environment and economic characteristics.  Our reporting segments are described below.

Transportation and Skilled Trades – Transportation and Skilled Trades offers academic programs mainly in the career-oriented disciplines of transportation and skilled trades (e.g. automotive, diesel, HVAC, welding and manufacturing).

Healthcare and Other Professions – Healthcare and Other Professions offers academic programs in the career-oriented disciplines of health sciences, hospitality and business and information technology (e.g. dental assistant, medical assistant, practical nursing, culinary arts and cosmetology).
Transitional – Transitional refers to operations that are being phased out or closed and consists of our campuses that are currently being taught out.  These schools are employing a gradual teach-out process that enables the schools to continue to operate while current students complete their course of study.  These schools are no longer enrolling new students.  In addition, in March 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a plan to cease operations at our schools in Brockton, Massachusetts and Lowell, Massachusetts.  These schools are being taught out and expected to be closed in December 2017.  During the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company announced the closing of our Northeast Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Center City Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and West Palm Beach, Florida facilities.  These schools are expected to be fully taught out on August 31, 2017, August 31, 2017, and September 30, 2017, respectively.  In the first quarter of 2015,2016, we announced that we are teaching out our campus in Fern Park, Florida and in December 2015, we announced that we are teaching out our campus in Hartford Connecticut.  Thecompleted the teach-out atof our Fern Park, Florida campus has beencampus.   In addition, in the fourth quarter of 2016, we completed as of March 31, 2016 and the teach-out of our Hartford, Connecticut and Henderson (Green Valley), Nevada campuses.

The Company continually evaluates each campus for profitability, earning potential, and customer satisfaction.  This evaluation takes several factors into consideration, including the campus’s geographic location and program offerings, as well as skillsets required of our students by their potential employers.  The purpose of this evaluation is expected to be completedensure that our programs provide our students with the best possible opportunity to succeed in December 2016.the marketplace with the goals of attracting more students to our programs and, ultimately, to provide the shareholders with the maximum return on their investment.  Campuses in the Transitional segment have been subject to this process and have been strategically identified for closure.

We evaluate segment performance based on operating results.  Adjustments to reconcile segment results to consolidated results are included under the caption “Corporate,” which primarily includes unallocated corporate activity.

The following table present results for our three reportable segments for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

  Three Months Months Ended June 30, 2017 
  2017  2016  % Change 
Revenue:
         
Transportation and Skilled Trades $41,310  $41,032   0.7%
Healthcare and Other Professions  17,932   18,661   -3.9%
Transitional  2,623   8,387   -68.7%
Total $61,865  $68,080   -9.1%
             
Operating Income (Loss):
            
Transportation and Skilled Trades $850  $2,430   -65.0%
Healthcare and Other Professions  (634)  918   -169.1%
Transitional  (833)  (1,458)  42.9%
Corporate  (5,414)  (5,123)  -5.7%
Total $(6,031) $(3,233)  -86.5%
             
Starts:
            
Transportation and Skilled Trades  1,762   1,936   -9.0%
Healthcare and Other Professions  842   820   2.7%
Transitional  -   348   -100.0%
Total  2,604   3,104   -16.1%
             
Average Population:
            
Transportation and Skilled Trades  6,532   6,490   0.6%
Healthcare and Other Professions  3,471   3,492   -0.6%
Transitional  579   1,535   -62.3%
Total  10,582   11,517   -8.1%
Three Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2016

Transportation and Skilled Trades
Student start results decreased by 9.0% to 1,762 from 1,936 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year comparable period.    This decrease was a result of lower than expected start rates for high school students.  The majority of the decline occurred at three campuses and was directly attributable to affordability and sustainability of student engagement between enrollment and start date.  In addition, in striving to find the optimum affordability balance the Company experienced a start decline in markets where scholarships were scaled back.  External factors including low unemployment rates and increased wages for both skilled and unskilled labor also contributed to the decline in student starts.
 
The following table present results for our two reportable segments:

  Three Months Ended June 30, 
  2016  2015  % Change 
Revenue:
         
Transportation and Skilled Trades $41,032  $42,447   -3.3%
Transitional  862   2,292   -62.4%
Total $41,894  $44,739   -6.4%
             
Operating Income (Loss):
            
Transportation and Skilled Trades $2,431  $2,770   -12.2%
Transitional  (1,147)  (1,926)  40.4%
Corporate  (4,123)  (5,219)  21.0%
Total $(2,839) $(4,375)  35.1%
             
Starts:
            
Transportation and Skilled Trades  1,936   1,930   0.3%
Transitional  -   16   -100.0%
Total  1,936   1,946   -0.5%
             
Average Population:
            
Transportation and Skilled Trades  6,489   6,978   -7.0%
Transitional  109   321   -66.0%
Total  6,598   7,299   -9.6%
 
End of Period Population:
            
Transportation and Skilled Trades  6,950   7,321   -5.1%
Transitional  91   293   -68.9%
Total  7,041   7,614   -7.5%

Three Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2015

Transportation and Skilled Trades
Revenue was lowerOperating income decreased by $1.4$1.6 million, or 3.3%65.0%, to $41$0.9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2016, as compared to $42.4from $2.4 million in the prior year comparable period primarilymainly driven by a 7.0% decline in average population which decreased to approximately 6,500 from 7,000 in the prior year comparable period, however, student starts grew slightly for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 compared to prior year comparable period.  The decrease in average population was a result of starting 2016 with approximately 600 fewer students than we had on January 1, 2015.following factors:

The revenue decline from a lower population was slightly offset by a 3.8% increase in average revenue per student due to a shift in program mix.

 Operating income was $2.4 million compared to $2.8 million, a decrease of $0.3 million, or 12.2%, due to several factors:
·Revenue increased by $0.3 million, or 0.7% to $41.3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from $41.0 million in the prior year comparable period.  The increase in revenue was primarily driven by higher carry in population compared to the prior year comparable period.
·Educational services and facilities expense increasedremained essentially flat only increasing by $0.5$0.1 million comprised of: a $0.4 million, or 5.0%,quarter over quarter.  This increase in facilities expense,is primarily dueattributable to increased depreciation expense as a result of the reclassification of one campus out of heldcosts associated with materials used for sale as of December 31, 2015; increased rent expense resulting from the modification of a lease at three of our campuses which were previously accounted for as finance obligations under which rent payments were previously included in interest expense; and increased books and tools expenses resulting from the purchase of laptops which were provided to newly enrolled students in certain programs to enhance and expand their overall learning experience. These additional expenses were partially offset by $0.3 million, or 3.1%, decrease in instructional expense as a result of realigning our cost structure to meet our student population.purposes.
·Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $1.8 million due to $0.9 million of additional bad debt expense primarily the result of higher student accounts receivable, higher account write-offs, and timing of Title IV fund receipts.    In addition, sales and marketing expense increased by $0.7 million resulting from strategic marketing initiatives intended to reach more students.  These initiatives resulted in a slight improvement in starts in the adult demographic quarter over quarter.
Healthcare and Other Professions
Student start results increased by 2.7% to 842 from 820 for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year comparable period.

Operating loss for the three months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.6 million compared to operating income of $0.9 million in the prior year comparable period.  The $1.6 million change was mainly driven by the following factors:

·Revenue decreased to $17.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $18.7 million in the prior year comparable quarter.  The decrease in revenue is mainly attributable to a 3.4% decline in average revenue per student due to shifts in our program mix combined with tuition rate decreases in various programs.  Slightly offsetting the decline in revenue was a 2.7% increase in student starts for the quarter compared to the prior year comparable period.
·Educational services and facilities expense remained essentially flat for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year comparable period.
·
Selling general and administrative expenses decreasedincreased by $1.5$1.0 million primarily comprised ofresulting from a $1.3$0.6 million decreaseincrease in sales and marketing expense, which has driven student starts up 2.7% quarter over quarter and a $0.3 million increase in administrative expense primarily the result of a decrease in salaries and benefits, lower bad debt expense and reduced legal expenses.  The improvement in bad debt expense wasexpenses mainly the result of an improved historical collection ratesincreased bad debt primarily due to higher student accounts receivable, higher account write-offs, and shift in student mix.timing of Title IV fund receipts.
Transitional

The following table lists the schools that are categorized in the Transitional segment and their status as of June 30, 2017:

CampusDate ClosedDate Scheduled to Close
Northeast Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaN/AAugust 31, 2017
Center City Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaN/AAugust 31, 2017
West Palm Beach, FloridaN/ASeptember 30, 2017
Brockton, MassachusettsN/ADecember 31, 2017
Lowell, MassachusettsN/ADecember 31, 2017
Fern Park, FloridaMarch 31, 2016N/A
Hartford, ConnecticutDecember 31, 2016N/A
Henderson (Green Valley), NevadaDecember 31, 2016N/A
**Revenue for the campuses in the above table have been classified in the Transitional segment for comparability for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

Revenue was $2.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to $8.4 million in the prior year comparable period mainly attributable to the closing of campuses within this segment.

Operating loss decreased by $0.6 million to $0.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017 from $1.5 million in the prior year comparable period.  The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in salaries and benefits as a result of the suspension of new student enrollments and a declining student population.
 
Despite the revenue decrease of $1.4 million, operating income declined only by $0.3 million as a result of cost management efforts.

Transitional
This segment consists of the Fern Park, Florida and Hartford, Connecticut campuses.  The Fern Park, Florida campus has fully taught out all of its existing students and was officially closed as of March 31, 2016.  The Hartford, Connecticut campus has ceased student enrollment and is currently still teaching out the remaining students through December 2016.

Revenue decreased by $1.4 million, or 62.4%, to $0.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016 from $2.3 million, in the prior year comparable period.  This decrease is mainly attributable to the closure of the Fern Park, Florida campus and the suspension of new student enrollment at our Hartford, Connecticut location which took effect in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Operating loss decreased by $0.8 million, or 40.4%, to $1.1 million from $1.9 million.

Corporate and Other

This category includes unallocated expenses incurred on behalf of the Company.  Corporate and Other costs decreased by $1.1 million, or 21.0%, to $4.1 for the three months ended June 30, 2016 from $5.2 million for the comparable prior year quarter.  This decrease was primarily a result of cost management efforts by the Company to meet its long term strategic goals and objectives.
The following table present results for our two reportable segments:

  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2016  2015  % Change 
Revenue:         
Transportation and Skilled Trades $83,303  $87,291   -4.6%
Transitional  2,034   5,122   -60.3%
Total $85,337  $92,413   -7.7%
             
Operating Income (Loss):            
Transportation and Skilled Trades $5,796  $7,745   -25.2%
Transitional  (4,113)  (3,748)  -9.7%
Corporate  (10,846)  (13,208)  17.9%
Total $(9,163) $(9,211)  0.5%
             
Starts:            
Transportation and Skilled Trades  3,596   3,717   -3.3%
Transitional  -   98   -100.0%
Total  3,596   3,815   -5.7%
             
Average Population:            
Transportation and Skilled Trades  6,521   7,101   -8.2%
Transitional  135   364   -62.9%
Total  6,656   7,465   -10.8%
             
End of Period Population:            
Transportation and Skilled Trades  6,950   7,321   -5.1%
Transitional  91   293   -68.9%
Total  7,041   7,614   -7.5%

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2015

Transportation and Skilled Trades
Revenue decreased by $4 million, or 4.6%, to $83.3 million in the six months ending June 30, 2016, as compared to $87.3 million in the prior year comparable period, primarily driven by an 8.2% decline in average population which decreased to approximately 6,500 from 7,100 in the prior year comparable period.  The decrease in average population was a result of starting 2016 with approximately 600 fewer students than we had on January 1, 2015.

The overall starts number is lower by 3.3% compared to 2015; however, it is an improvement compared to the 5.3% decline for the same period in 2015 compared to the second quarter of 2014.

The revenue decline from a lower population was slightly offset by a 3.8% increase in average revenue per student due to a shift in program mix.

Operating income was $5.8 million compared to $7.7 million, a decrease of $2 million, or 25.2%, driven by the following main factors:
·Educational services and facilities expense increased by $0.6 million, comprised of a $0.9 million, or 5.3%, increase in facilities expense, primarily due to increased depreciation expense as a result of the reclassification of one campus out of held for sale as of December 31, 2015; increased rent expense resulting from the modification of a lease at three of our campuses which were previously accounted for as finance obligations under which rent payments were previously included in interest expense; and increased books and tools expenses resulting from the purchase of laptops which were provided to newly enrolled students in certain programs to enhance and expand their overall learning experience.   Partially offsetting the above increases was a $0.8 million, or 4.2%, decrease in instructional expense as a result of realigning our cost structure to meet our population.
·Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by $2.6 million primarily comprised of a $1.9 million decrease in administrative expenses which was primarily the result of a decrease in salaries and benefits, lower bad debt expense and reduced legal expenses.  The improvement in bad debt expense was mainly the result of an improved historical collection rates and shift in student mix.

Despite the revenue decrease of $4 million, operating income declined only by $2 million, as a result of cost management measures implemented which will continue in order to further improve operating efficiencies.

Transitional
This segment consists of our Fern Park, Florida and Hartford, Connecticut campuses where we have ceased student enrollment.  Our Fern Park, Florida campus has fully taught out all of its existing students and is officially closed as of March 31, 2016, while our Hartford, Connecticut campus is currently still teaching out the remaining students through December 2016.

Revenue decreased by $3.1 million, or 60.3%, to $2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $5.1 million, in the prior year comparable period.  This decrease is mainly attributable to the closing of our Fern Park, Florida campus and the suspension of new student enrollment at our Hartford, Connecticut location which took effect in the fourth quarter of 2015.

Operating loss increased by $0.4 million, or 9.7%, to $4.1 million from $3.7 million.

Corporate and Other
This category includes unallocated expenses incurred on behalf of the entire Company.  Corporate and Other costs decreasedincreased by $2.4$0.3 million, or 17.9%5.7%, to $10.8$5.4 million from $5.1 million, for the prior year comparable period.

The increase in Corporate expenses was driven in part by a $1.0 million increase in medical expenses resulting from historically low claims in 2016 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2017.  Partially offsetting this expense is a reduction in salaries and benefits of $0.7 million.

Included in Corporate and Other costs for the three months ended June 30, 2017 are approximately $0.3 million of additional dormitory costs directly relating to the closure of the Hartford, Connecticut campus on December 31, 2016.  

The following table present results for our three reportable segments for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016:

  Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 
  2017  2016  % Change 
Revenue:
         
Transportation and Skilled Trades $83,477  $83,304   0.2%
Healthcare and Other Professions  36,769   38,470   -4.4%
Transitional  6,898   16,950   -59.3%
Total $127,144  $138,724   -8.3%
             
Operating Income (Loss):
            
Transportation and Skilled Trades $2,898  $5,796   -50.0%
Healthcare and Other Professions  (474)  2,673   -117.7%
Transitional  (1,401)  (5,101)  72.5%
Corporate  (12,782)  (12,845)  0.5%
Total $(11,759) $(9,477)  -24.1%
             
Starts:
            
Transportation and Skilled Trades  3,486   3,596   -3.1%
Healthcare and Other Professions  1,843   1,933   -4.7%
Transitional  132   806   -83.6%
Total  5,461   6,335   -13.8%
             
Average Population:
            
Transportation and Skilled Trades  6,553   6,521   0.5%
Healthcare and Other Professions  3,552   3,618   -1.8%
Transitional  731   1,564   -53.3%
Total  10,836   11,703   -7.4%
             
End of Period Population:
            
Transportation and Skilled Trades  6,809   6,950   -2.0%
Healthcare and Other Professions  3,219   3,160   1.9%
Transitional  372   1,398   -73.4%
Total  10,400   11,508   -9.6%

Six Months Ended June 30, 2017 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2016

Transportation and Skilled Trades
Student start results decreased by 3.1% to 3,486 from $13.23,596 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year comparable period.  This decrease was a result of lower than expected start rates for high school students.  The decline occurred primarily at three campuses and was directly attributable to affordability and sustainability of student engagement between enrollment and start date.  In addition, in striving to find the optimum affordability balance the Company experienced a start decline in markets where scholarships were scaled back.  External factors including low unemployment rates and increased wages for both skilled and unskilled labor also contributed to the decline in student starts.
Operating income decreased by $2.9 million, or 50.0%, to $2.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2015.2017 from $5.8 million in the prior year comparable period mainly driven by the following factors:

·Revenue increased by $0.2 million, or 0.2% to $83.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from $83.3 million in the prior year comparable period.  The increase in revenue was primarily driven by higher carry in population compared to the prior year comparable period.
·Educational services and facilities expense remained essentially flat only decreasing by $0.2 million.   The decrease was mainly due to decreased depreciation expense partially offset by an increase in instructional expense and an increase in books and tools expense.
·
Selling, general and administrative expense increased by $3.3 million due to $1.1 million of additional bad debt expense resulting from higher accounts receivable balances, higher account write-offs, and timing of Title IV fund receipts , as well as a $1.6 million increase in spending for sales and marketing.  The increased spending in sales and marketing was part of a strategic effort to attract student enrollments and increase brand awareness.  This initiative has yielded positive results in our adult demographic which was up slightly for the for the six months ended June 30, 2017 over the prior year comparable period; however, the high school demographic produced lower than expected starts in the current period.  Partially offsetting these expenses is a $0.4 million decrease in student services which can be attributed to reduced salaries and benefits.
Healthcare and Other Professions
Student start results decreased by 4.7% to 1,843 from 1,933 for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the prior year comparable period.

Operating loss for the six months ended June 30, 2017 was $0.5 million compared to operating income of $2.7 million in the prior year comparable period.  The $3.1 million change was mainly driven by the following factors:
·Revenue decreased to $36.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to $38.5 million in the prior year comparable quarter.  The decrease in revenue is mainly attributable to a 2.7% decline in average revenue per student due to shifts in our program mix combined with tuition rate decreases in various programs
·Educational services and facilities expense decreased by $0.3 million, or 1.3% to $19.7 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017, from $19.9 million in the prior year comparable period.  The decrease was primarily the result of $0.4 million of costs reductions in facilities expense as a result of reduced rent expense and real estate taxes resulting from the relocation of one of our campuses in the second quarter of 2016.  Partially offsetting the costs reduction is an increase of $0.2 million in books and tools expense as a result of increased purchasing of new laptops for students attending certain programs in combination with increases in salaries and benefits.
·
Selling general and administrative expenses increased by $1.7 million primarily resulting from a $1.0 million increase in sales and marketing expense; and a $0.6 million increase in administrative expenses mainly the result of bad debt expense which increased due to higher student accounts receivable, higher account write-offs, and timing of Title IV fund receipts.
Transitional
Revenue was $6.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to $17.0 million in the prior year comparable period mainly attributable to the closing of campuses within this segment.

Operating loss decreased by $3.7 million to $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 from $5.1 million in the prior year comparable period.  The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in salaries and benefits as a result of cost management effortsthe suspension of new student enrollments and a declining student population.

Corporate and Other
This category includes unallocated expenses incurred on behalf of the entire Company.  Corporate and Other costs remained essentially flat for the six months ended June 30, 2017 when compared to the prior year comparable period.  Included in the expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017 are approximately $1.0 million in increased medical expenses resulting from historically low medical claims in 2016 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017, partially offset by a reduction in salaries and benefits of $0.5 million in the Companycurrent period.
Included in Corporate and Other costs for the six months ended June 30, 2017 are approximately $0.6 million of additional dormitory costs directly relating to meet its long term strategic goals and objectives.the closure of the Hartford, Connecticut campus on December 31, 2016. 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary capital requirements are for facilities expansion and maintenance, and the development of new programs. Our principal sources of liquidity have been cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under our term loan facility.credit facilities.  The following chart summarizes the principal elements of our cash flow:

 
Six Months Ended
June 30,
   
Six Months Ended
June 30,
  
 2016  2015  2017  2016 
Net cash used in operating activities $(18,138) $(11,646) $(19,511) $(18,138)
Net cash used in investing activities  (307)  (1,218)  (1,766)  (307)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities  (9,025)  5,415 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  7,423   (9,025)

As ofAt June 30, 2016, we2017, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $37.8 million, including restricted cash of $26.8 million representing a decrease of approximately $23.2 as compared to $61$13.4 million of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (which includes $6.2 million of restricted cash) as compared to $47.7 million of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash (which includes $26.7 million of restricted cash) as of December 31, 2015.  2016.  This decrease is primarily the result of a net loss during the year of approximately $9.2 million; a $2.9 million lease termination fee paid in connection with the termination of the lease for our Fern Park, Florida campus; $0.7 million loan modification fee paid to our lender in relation to an amendment of our Term Loan; and $0.7 million in severance paid during the six months ended June 30, 2016.  In addition, the decrease in2017; repayment of $44.3 million under our cash position is reflective of theprevious term loan facility; and seasonality of the industry, the reduction in revenue, and the timing of Title IV funds received.business.

For the last several years, wethe Company and the proprietary school sector generally have faced deteriorating earnings growth. Government regulations have negatively impacted earnings by making it more difficult for potentialprospective students to obtain loans, which when coupled with the overall economic environment have discouraged potentialhindered prospective students from enrolling in our schools. In light of these factors, we have incurred significant operating losses as a result of lower student population.  Despite these events, we believe that our likely sources of cash should be sufficient to fund operations for the next twelve months.  As of June 30, 2016, our available sources of cash primarily include cash from operationsmonths and cash and cash equivalents of $10.9.thereafter for the foreseeable future.

To fund our business plans, including any anticipated future losses, purchase commitments, capital expenditures and principal and interest payments on borrowings, we leveraged our owned real estate that is not classified as held for sale.estate. We are also continuing to take actions to improve cash flow by aligning our cost structure to our student population.
Our primary source of cash is tuition collected from our students. The majority of students enrolled at our schools rely on funds received under various government-sponsored student financial aid programs to pay a substantial portion of their tuition and other education-related expenses. The largest of these programs are Title IV Programsprograms which represented approximately 80%79% of our cash receipts relating to revenues in 2015.2016. Students must apply for a new loan for each academic period. Federal regulations dictate the timing of disbursements of funds under Title IV Programsprograms and loan funds are generally provided by lenders in two disbursements for each academic year. The first disbursement is usually received approximately 31 days after the start of a student'sstudent’s academic year and the second disbursement is typically received at the beginning of the sixteenth week from the start of the student'sstudent’s academic year. Certain types of grants and other funding are not subject to a 30-day31-day delay.  In certain instances, if a student withdraws from a program prior to a specified date, any paid but unearned tuition or prorated Title IV financial aid is refunded according to federal, state and accrediting agency standards.

As a result of the significance of the Title IV funds received by our students, we are highly dependent on these funds to operate our business. Any reduction in the level of Title IV funds that our students are eligible to receive or any impactrestriction on our ability to be ableeligibility to receive Title IV funds would have a significant impact on our operations and our financial condition.  See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A included inof our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016.

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $18.1$19.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 20162017 compared to $11.6$18.1 million for the comparable period of 2015.2016.  For the six months ended June 30, 2017, changes in our operating assets and liabilities resulted in cash outflows of $15.3 million primarily attributable to decreases in deferred revenue, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses.  The $6.5 million decrease in netdeferred revenue resulted in a cash outflow of $4.3 million primarily resulted from aattributable to the timing of student starts, the number of students in school and the status of students in relation to the completion of their program at June 30, 2017 when compared to June 30, 2016.  The decrease in collectionsaccounts receivable resulted in a cash outflow of $9.3 million primarily due to lower populationthe timing of Title IV disbursements and other working capital items.cash receipts on behalf of our students.  The net decrease in accounts payable and accrued expenses resulted in a cash outflow of $1.8 million and was attributable to the timing of invoices received during the quarter.

Investing Activities

Net cash used in investing activities was $0.3 million compared to $1.2$1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2017 compared to $0.3 million for the prior year comparable period.   Our primary use of cash in investing activities was capital expenditures associated with investments in training technology, classroom furniture, and new program build outs.buildouts.

We currently lease a majority of our campuses. We own our campuses in Grand Prairie, Texas; Nashville, Tennessee; West Palm Beach, Florida; Nashville, Tennessee;Florida, Suffield, Connecticut; and Denver, Colorado.  The sale of two of our three properties in West Palm Beach, Florida, is pending for a cash purchase price of $15.7 million.  We have 17 schools that are held for sale.expect to close on the sale of the West Palm Beach, Florida property in the third quarter of 2017.

Capital expenditures are expected to approximate 2% of revenues in 2016.2017.  We expect to fund future capital expenditures with cash generated from operating activities, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, and cash borrowed underfrom our term loan.real estate monetization, including the pending sale of the Company’s West Palm Beach, Florida property.  On April 28, 2017, the Company obtained from its lender, Sterling National Bank, an $8 million short-term loan secured by the West Palm Beach, Florida property.  This loan must be repaid upon the earlier of the sale of the West Palm Beach, Florida property or October 1, 2017.

Financing Activities

Net cash used inprovided by financing activities was $9.0$7.4 million as compared to net cash provided from financing activitiesused of $5.4$9.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. The decreaseincrease of $13.6$16.4 million was primarily due to three main factors: (a) net borrowing of $9.0 million; (b) $2.9 million in lease termination payments resulting fromfees paid in the termination of our lease agreement for our Fern Park, Florida campus; a decrease in net borrowing of $6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 as compared to the six months June 30, 2015;prior year; and (c) the reclassification of $5.0$5 million in restricted cash in the prior year.

Net borrowings consisted of: (a) total borrowing to date under our new secured revolving credit facility of $38.0 million; (b) reclassification of payments of borrowing from restricted cash.cash of $20.3 million; and (c) $49.3 million in total repayments made by the Company.

Credit Agreement

On JulyMarch 31, 2015,2017, the Company entered into a secured revolving credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with three lenders, AlostarSterling National Bank (the “Bank”) pursuant to which the Company obtained a credit facility in the aggregate principal amount of Commerceup to $55 million (the “Credit Facility”).  The Credit Facility consists of (a) a $30 million loan facility (“Alostar”Facility 1”), HPF Holdco, LLCwhich is comprised of a $25 million revolving loan designated as “Tranche A” and Rushing Creek 4, LLC,a $5 million non-revolving loan designated as “Tranche B,” which Tranche B was repaid during the quarter ended June 30, 2017 and (b) a $25 million revolving loan facility (“Facility 2”), which includes a sublimit amount for letters of credit of $10 million.  The Credit Facility replaces a term loan facility (the “Prior Credit Facility”) from a lender group led by HPF Service, LLC, as administrative agentwhich was repaid and collateral agent (the “Agent”), for an aggregate principal amount of $45 million (the “Term Loan”).  The July 31, 2015 credit agreement, alongterminated concurrently with subsequent amendments to the Credit Agreement dated December 31, 2015 and February 29, 2016, are collectively referred to as the “Credit Agreement.”  As of December 31, 2015 and prior to the effectiveness of a second amendment to the Credit AgreementFacility.  The term of the Credit Facility is 38 months, maturing on February 29, 2016 (the “Second Amendment”), the Term Loan consisted of a $30 million term loan (the “Term Loan A”) from HPF Holdco, LLC, Rushing Creek 4, LLC and Tiger Capital Group, LLC,May 31, 2020.
The Credit Facility is secured by a first priority lien in favor of the AgentBank on substantially all of the real and personal property owned by the Company and a $15 million term loan (the “Term Loan B”) from Alostar securedas well as mortgages on four parcels of real property owned by a $15.3 million cash collateral account. Pursuant to the Second Amendment, the Company received an additional $5 million term loan from Alostar within Connecticut, Colorado, Tennessee and Texas at which four of the Company’s schools are located.
At the closing, the Company repaid $5 million of the principal amount of the Term Loan A.  Accordingly, upon the effectiveness of the Second Amendment, the aggregate term loans outstanding under the Credit Agreement were approximately $45 million, consisting of an approximatedrew $25 million Term Loanunder Tranche A and a $20 million Term Loan B.  In addition,of Facility 1, which, pursuant to the Second Amendment, the amount of cash collateral securing the Term Loan B was increased to $20.3 million.  At the Company’s request, a percentage of the cash collateral may be released to the Company at the Agent’s sole discretion and with the consent of Alostar upon the satisfaction of certain criteria as outlined in the Credit Agreement.  The Term Loan, which matures on July 31, 2019, replaced a previously existing $20 million revolving credit facility with Bank of America, N.A. and other lenders, which was due to expire on April 5, 2016.  The previously existing revolving credit facility was terminated concurrently with the effective dateterms of the Credit Agreement, on July 31, 2015 (the “Closing Date”).was used to repay the Prior Credit Facility and to pay transaction costs associated with closing the Credit Facility.  After the disbursements of such amounts, the Company retained approximately $1.8 million of the borrowed amount for working capital purposes.
 
Also, at closing, $5 million was drawn under Tranche B and, pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, was deposited into an interest-bearing pledged account (the “Pledged Account”) in the name of the Company maintained at the Bank in order to secure payment obligations of the Company with respect to the costs of remediation of any environmental contamination discovered at certain of the mortgaged properties upon completion of environmental studies undertaken at such properties.  Pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, funds will be released from the Pledged Account upon request by the Company to reimburse the Company for costs incurred for environmental remediation, if required.  Upon the completion of any such environmental remediation or upon determination that no environmental remediation is necessary, funds remaining in the Pledged Account will be released from the Pledged Account and applied to the outstanding principal balance of Tranche B and availability under Tranche B will be permanently reduced to zero and, accordingly, the maximum principal amount of Facility 1 will be permanently reduced to $25 million.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2017 the environmental studies were completed and revealed no environmental issues existing at the properties.  Accordingly, pursuant to the terms of the Credit Agreement, the $5 million on deposit in the Pledged Account was released and used to repay the non-revolving loan outstanding under Tranche B.  Upon the repayment of Tranche B, the maximum principal amount of Facility 1 was permanently reduced to $25 million.
A portionPursuant to the terms of the proceedsCredit Agreement, all draws under Facility 2 for letters of credit or revolving loans must be secured by cash collateral in an amount equal to 100% of the Term Loan was used by the Company to (i) repay approximately $6.3 million in outstanding principal, accrued interest and fees due under the previously existing revolving credit facility, (ii) fund the $20.3 million cash collateral account securing the portionaggregate stated amount of the Term Loan provided by Alostar, (iii) fund approximately $7.4 million in a cash collateral account securing the letters of credit issued under the previously existingand revolving credit facility that remainloans outstanding after the termination of that facility and (iv) pay transaction expenses in connection with the Term Loan and the terminationthrough draws from Facility 1 or other available cash of the previously existing revolving credit facility.  The remaining proceeds of the Term Loan of approximately $11.0 million may be used by the Company to finance capital expenditures and for general corporate purposes consistent with the terms of the Credit Agreement.Company.

Interest will accrueAccrued interest on the Term Loan at a per annum rate equal to the greater of (i) 11% or (ii) 90-day LIBOR plus 9%  determined monthly by the Agent andeach revolving loan will be payable monthly in arrears.  Revolving loans under Tranche A of Facility 1 will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (x) the Bank’s prime rate plus 2.50% and (y) 6.00%.  The principal balanceamount borrowed under Tranche B of Facility 1 and revolving loans under Facility 2 will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the Term Loan will be repaid in equal monthly installments, commencing on August 1, 2017, determined asgreater of (x) the quotient of (i) 10% of the outstanding principal balance of the Term Loan as of July 2, 2017 divided by (ii) 12.  A final installment of principalBank’s prime rate and all accrued and unpaid interest will be due on the maturity date of the Term Loan.(y) 3.50%.

The Term Loan may be prepaid, in whole or in part, at any time, subject toEach issuance of a letter of credit under Facility 2 will require the payment of a prepayment premium equal to (i) 5% of the principal amount prepaid at any time up to but not including the second anniversary of the Closing Date and (ii) 3% of the principal amount prepaid at any time commencing on the second anniversary of the Closing Date up to but not including the third anniversary of the Closing Date.  In the event of any sale or other disposition of a school or real property by the Company permitted under the Term Loan, the net proceeds of such sale or disposition must be used to prepay the Loan in an amount determined pursuant to the Credit Agreement, subject to the applicable prepayment premium; provided, however, that no prepayment premium will be due with respect to up to $15 million of aggregate repayments of the Term Loan made during the first year that the Term Loan is outstanding.  A portion of the net cash proceeds of any disposition of a school in an amount determined pursuant to the terms of the Term Loan, must be deposited and held as cash collateral in a deposit account controlled by the Agent until the conditions for release set forth in the Term Loan are satisfied.  In connection with the assets which are currently classified as held for sale and are expected to be sold within one year, the Company is required to classify $10 million as short term debt due to the Term Loan prepayment minimum required with respect to any such disposition.

The Term Loan contains customary representations, warranties and covenants such as minimum financial responsibility composite score, cohort default rate, and other financial covenants, including minimum liquidity, maximum capital expenditures, maximum 90/10 ratio and minimum EBITDA (as defined in the Term Loan), as well as affirmative and negative covenants and events of default customary for facilities of this type.  Pursuant to the Second Amendment, the financial covenants were adjusted and, at the Company’s election, will be adjusted for fiscal year 2017 and for each subsequent fiscal year until the maturity of the Term Loan at either the levels applicable to fiscal year 2016 (and each fiscal quarter thereof) contained in the Credit Agreement as of the Closing Date or the levels applicable to fiscal year 2016 (and each fiscal quarter thereof) contained in the Second Amendment.  In the event that the Company elects to re-set the financial covenants at the 2016 covenant levels contained in the Second Amendment, the Company will be required to prepay on or before January 15, 2017, without prepayment penalty, amounts outstanding under the Term Loan up to $4 million.  The Company was in compliance with all financial covenants as of June 30, 2016.

The Credit Agreement contains events of default, the occurrence and continuation of which provide the Company’s lenders with the right to exercise remedies against the Company and the collateral securing the Term Loan, including the Company’s cash. These events of default include, among other things, the Company’s failure to pay any amounts due under the Term Loan, a breach of covenants under the Credit Agreement, the Company’s insolvency and the insolvency of its subsidiaries, the occurrence of a material adverse event, the occurrence of any default under certain other indebtedness, and a final judgment against the Company in an amount greater than $1 million.

Also, in connection with the Term Loan, the Company paid to the Agent a commitment fee of $1 million on the Closing Date and is required to pay to the Agent other customary fees for facilities of this type. Total fees for the Term Loan were $2.8 million during the fiscal year 2015, which are included in deferred finance charges on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.  During the first quarter of 2016, in connection with the effectiveness of the Second Amendment, the Company paid to the Agent a loan modification fee of $0.5 million.

L/C Credit Agreement

On April 12, 2016, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “L/C Agreement”) with Sterling National Bank (“Sterling” under which Sterling has agreed to issue letters of credit from time to time at 100% margin against available funds in a cash collateral account maintained by the Company at Sterling.  The maximum availability under the L/C Agreement is $9.5 million.  The Company will pay Sterling a letter of credit fee to the Bank equal to a rate per annum of 1.75% on the daily amount available to be drawn under each outstandingthe letter of credit, which fee isshall be payable in quarterly installments in arrears.  The L/C Agreement maturesLetters of credit totaling $6.2 million that were outstanding under a $9.5 million letter of credit facility previously provided to the Company by the Bank, which letter of credit facility was set to mature on April 1, 2017, and replaces a letterare treated as letters of credit under Facility 2.

Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, the Bank receives an unused facility fee on the average daily unused balance of Facility 1 at a rate per annum equal to 0.50%, which fee is payable quarterly in arrears.  In addition, the Company is required to maintain, on deposit with the Bank in one or more non-interest bearing accounts, a prior lender.  The L/Cminimum of $5 million in quarterly average aggregate balances.  If in any quarter the required average aggregate account balance is not maintained, the Company is required to pay the Bank a fee of $12,500 for that quarter.  Under the terms of the Credit Agreement, in the event that the Company terminates the Credit Facility or refinances with another lender within 18 months of closing, the Company shall be required to pay the Bank a breakage fee of $500,000.

In addition to the foregoing, the Credit Agreement contains customary representations, warranties and affirmative and negative covenants, including financial covenants that restrict capital expenditures, prohibit the incurrence of a net loss commencing on December 31, 2018 and require a minimum adjusted EBITDA and a minimum tangible net worth, which is an annual covenant, as well as events of default customary for facilities of this type.  As of June 30, 2017, the Company is in compliance with all covenants.

In connection with the Credit Agreement, the Company paid the Bank an origination fee in the amount of $250,000 and other fees and reimbursements that are customary for facilities of this type.

The Company incurred an early termination premium of approximately $1.8 million in connection with the termination of the Prior Credit Facility.

On April 28, 2017, the Company entered into an additional secured credit agreement with its existing lender, Sterling National Bank, pursuant to which the Company has obtained a short term loan in the principal amount of $8 million, the proceeds of which are to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes.  The loan bears interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of the Bank’s prime rate plus 2.50% or 6.00%.
The loan is secured by property located in West Palm Beach, Florida at which schools operated by the Company are currently located.  The loan is payable interest only until its maturity, which will occur upon the earlier of October 1, 2017 and the date of the sale of the West Palm Beach, Florida property.  The Company has entered into a contract to sell two of three properties located in West Palm Beach, Florida to Tambone Companies, LLC for a cash purchase price of $15.7 million.  The Company expects this sale to be completed in the third quarter of 2017.

As of June 30, 2017, the Company had $33 million outstanding under the Credit Facility (which includes the short term loan of $8 million); offset by $1.0 million of deferred finance fees.  As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $44.3 million outstanding under the Prior Credit Facility; offset by $2.3 million of deferred finance fees which were written-off.  As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 there were no letters of credit in the aggregate principal amount of $6.2 million outstanding, respectively.  As of June 30, 2017, there are no revolving loans outstanding under the L/C Agreement.Facility 2.
 
The following table sets forth our long-term debt (in thousands):

 
June 30,
2016
  
December 31,
2015
  
June 30,
2017
  
December 31,
2016
 
Credit agreement $32,023  $- 
Term loan $41,510  $42,124   -   44,267 
Finance obligation  3,355   9,672 
Capital lease-property (with a rate of 8.0%)  -   3,899 
  44,865   55,695   32,023   44,267 
Less current maturities  (13,355)  (10,114)  (8,000)  (11,713)
 $31,510  $45,581  $24,023  $32,554 

As of June 30, 2016,2017, we had outstanding loan commitments to our students of $31.7$42.2 million, as compared to $33.4$40.0 million at December 31, 2015.2016.  Loan commitments, net of interest that would be due on the loans through maturity, were $23.6$31.4 million at June 30, 2016,2017, as compared to $24.8$30.0 million at December 31, 2015.  Loan commitments decreased as a result of lower population and fewer campuses.2016.

Contractual Obligations

Long-term Debt.  As of June 30, 2016,2017, our current portion of long-term debt and our long-term debt consisted of borrowings under our Term Loan.Credit Facility.

Lease Commitments.  We lease offices, educational facilities and equipment for varying periods through the year 2030 at base annual rentals (excluding taxes, insurance, and other expenses under certain leases).

The following table contains supplemental information regarding our total contractual obligations as of June 30, 20162017 (in thousands):

 Payments Due by Period  Payments Due by Period 
 Total  
Less than
1 year
  1-3 years  3-5 years  
More than
5 years
  Total  
Less than
1 year
  1-3 years  3-5 years  
More than
5 years
 
Term Loan (including interest) $55,879  $14,384  $13,601  $27,894  $- 
Credit facility $33,000  $8,000  $-  $25,000  $- 
Operating leases  106,644   21,200   37,706   24,520   23,218   90,930   20,446   34,008   18,268   18,208 
Total contractual cash obligations $162,523  $35,584  $51,307  $52,414  $23,218  $123,930  $28,446  $34,008  $43,268  $18,208 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no off-balance sheet arrangements as of June 30, 2016,2017, except for surety bonds.  As of June 30, 2016,2017, we posted surety bonds in the total amount of approximately $14.9$14.3 million.  Cash collateralized letters of credit of $6.6$6.2 million are primarily comprised of letters of credit for the DOE and security deposits in connection with certain of our real estate leases. These off-balance sheet arrangements do not adversely impact our liquidity or capital resources.

Seasonality and Outlook

Seasonality

Our revenue and operating results normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal variations in our business, principally due to changes in total student population. Student population varies as a result of new student enrollments, graduations and student attrition. Historically, our schools have had lower student populations in our first and second quarters and we have experienced larger class starts in the third quarter and higher student attrition in the first half of the year. Our second half growth is largely dependent on a successful high school recruiting season. We recruit our high school students several months ahead of their scheduled start dates and, thus, while we have visibility on the number of students who have expressed interest in attending our schools, we cannot predict with certainty the actual number of new student enrollments and the related impact on revenue. Our expenses, however, typically do not vary significantly over the course of the year with changes in our student population and revenue. During the first half of the year, we make significant investments in marketing, staff, programs and facilities to meet our second half of the year targets and, as a result, such expenses do not fluctuate significantly on a quarterly basis. To the extent new student enrollments, and related revenue, in the second half of the year fall short of our estimates, our operating results could be negatively impacted. We expect quarterly fluctuations in operating results to continue as a result of seasonal enrollment patterns. Such patterns may change as a result of new school openings, new program introductions, and increased enrollments of adult students and/or acquisitions.
 
Outlook

Similar to many companies in the proprietary education sector, we have experienced significant deterioration in student enrollments over the last several years. This can be attributed to many factors including the economic environment and numerous regulatory changes such as changes to admissions advisor compensation policies, elimination of the ability-to-benefit (“ATB”),“ability-to-benefit,” changes to the 90/10 Rule and cohort default rates, gainful employment and modifications to Title IV amounts and eligibility. While the industry has not returned to growth the trends are far more stable as declines have slowed.

As the economy continues to improve and the unemployment rate continues to decline our student enrollment is negatively impacted due to a portion of our potential student base entering the workforce prematurely without obtaining any post-secondary training. Offsetting this short term decline in available students is the fact that an increasing number of the “baby boom” generation are retiring from the workforce.  The retirement of baby boomers coupled with a growing economy has resulted in additional employers looking to us to help solve their workforce needs.  With schools in 15 states, we are a very attractive employment solution for large regional and national employers.

To fund our business plans, including any anticipated future losses, purchase commitments, capital expenditures, principal and interest payments on borrowings and to satisfy the DOE financial responsibility standards, we have entered into a new Credit Agreementcredit facilities as described above and continue to have the ability to sell our assets that are classified as held for sale. We are also continuing to take actions to improve cash flow by aligning our cost structure to our student population.

Regulatory Update

On November 3,July 6, 2017, the DOE notified our Indianapolis, Indiana campus that an on-site Program Review is scheduled to begin on August 14, 2017. The Program Review will assess the institution’s administration of Title IV Programs in which the campus participated for the 2015-2016 and 2016-2017 award years.

On August 2, 2017, the DOE issued its Final Program Review Determination (“FPRD”) letter to the Columbia, MD, school that included the DOE’s review of our initial response and corrective actions for the five findings originally noted in the June 29, 2015, our Board of Directors approved a plan for usprogram review report.  The DOE concluded in its FPRD letter that the school had taken the corrective actions necessary to divest our Healthcareresolve and Other Professions business segment.  Implementationclose the first four findings.  The DOE concluded in the fifth finding that there were violations of the plan resultsClery Act, but accepted the school’s response and stated that it now considers the finding closed for program review purposes.  However, the DOE reserved the right to impose an administrative action and/or require additional corrective actions by the school in our operations focused solely onconnection with the Transportation and Skilled Trades business segment.  Due toClery Act finding in the Board’s decision to divestreport.  The DOE did not impose any financial liabilities in any of the Healthcare and Other Professions business segment, this segment was classified as discontinued operations and asset and liabilities classified as held for sale.

five findings in the FPRD letter. 

Item 3.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are exposed to certain market risks as part of our on-going business operations.  On JulyMarch 31, 2015,2017, the Company repaid in full and terminated a previously existing revolving line of creditterm loan with the proceeds of a new $45revolving credit facility provided by Sterling National Bank in an aggregate principal amount of up to $50 million, Term Loan.which revolving credit facility is referred to in this report as the “Credit Facility.”  Our obligations under the Term LoanCredit Facility are secured by a lien on substantially all of our assets and our subsidiaries and any assets that we or our subsidiaries may acquire in the future. Outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest at the rate of 11.0%6.75% as of June 30, 2016.2017.  As of June 30, 2016,2017, we had $44.3$33 million outstanding under the Term Loan.Credit Facility (which includes the short term loan of $8 million).

Based on our outstanding debt balance as of June 30, 2016,2017, a change of one percent in the interest rate would have caused a change in our interest expense of approximately $0.4$0.3 million, or $0.02$0.01 per basic share, on an annual basis.  Changes in interest rates could have an impact however on our operations, which are greatly dependent on our students’ ability to obtain financing. Any increase in interest rates could greatly impact our ability to attract students and have an adverse impact on the results of our operations. The remainder of our interest rate risk is associated with miscellaneous capital equipment leases, which is not significant.

Item 4.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a)   Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.  Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the quarterly period covered by this report, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are adequate and effective to reasonably ensure that material information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)   Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.  There were no changes made during our most recently completed fiscal quarter in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Information regarding certain specific legal proceedings in which the Company is involved is contained in Part I, Item 3 and in Note 14 to the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.  Unless otherwise indicated in this report, all proceedings discussed in the earlier report which are not indicated therein as having been concluded, remain outstanding as of June 30, 2017.

In the ordinary conduct of our business, we are subject to periodic lawsuits, investigations and claims, including, but not limited to, claims involving students or graduates and routine employment matters.  Although we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations and claims asserted against us, we do not believe that any currently pending legal proceeding to which we are a party will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

On December 15, 2015, the Company received an administrative subpoena from the Attorney General of the State of Maryland. Pursuant to the subpoena, Maryland’s Attorney General has requested from the Company documents and detailed information relating to its Columbia, Maryland campus.  The Company has responded to this request and intends to continue cooperating with the Maryland Attorney General’s Office.

Item 5.OTHER INFORMATION

On July 1, 2016, New England Institute of Technology at Palm Beach, Inc. (“NEIT”), a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a purchase and sale agreement (the “WPB Sale Agreement”) with School Property Development Metrocentre, LLC (“SPD”), pursuant to which NEIT has agreed to sell to SPD the real property owned by NEIT located at 2400 and 2410 Metrocentre Boulevard East, West Palm Beach, Florida, including the improvements and other personal property located thereon  (the “WPB Property”)  for a cash purchase price of approximately $15.9 million.  The WPB Sale Agreement contains customary representations, warranties, covenants and conditions to closing for agreements of this type.

Concurrently with the closing of the sale of the WPB Property and pursuant to the WPB Sale Agreement, NEIT will enter into a short-term lease agreement (the “WPB Lease”) with SPD under which NEIT will lease back the WPB Property for continued use as a school in order to allow the teach-out of currently enrolled students.  The monthly rental obligation under the WPB Lease is $100,000 plus the direct payment by NEIT of all real estate and other taxes and utility charges assessed against the WPB Property.  The term of the WPB Lease will run from the closing date through March 31, 2017, subject to extension at the option of NEIT for three additional months through June 30, 2017.  Upon the closing, as required by the Company’s credit agreement with its lender, the Company will repay, from the net cash proceeds of the sale, $10 million of the principal amount of its term loan, plus a $.5 million prepayment premium and accrued interest on the amount repaid. The Company expects that, assuming all conditions to closing are met, it will close on the sale in the third quarter of 2016.

The foregoing description does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the WPB Sale Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.
On August 3, 2016, the Company issued a press release reporting its financial results for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2016, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10Q.

Item 6.
EXHIBITS

Exhibit
Number
 
Description
  
10.1 *Purchase and Sale Agreement dated July 1, 2016 between New England Institute of Technology at Palm Beach, Inc. and School Property Development Metrocentre, LLC
 
10.2(1)10.1(1)Credit Agreement dated as of April 12, 201628, 2017 among Lincoln Educational Services Corporation, and Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and Sterling National Bank
  
31.1 *31.1*Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
31.2 *Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
32 *Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
101**The following financial statements from Lincoln Educational Services Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016,2017, formatted in XBRL: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii)(iii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii)Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, and (v)(vi) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail.
 

 
(1)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2016.May 4, 2017.

*Filed herewith.

**As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION
 
Date:August 9, 201610, 2017By:/s/ Brian Meyers 
Brian Meyers
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
 
Exhibit Index

Purchase and Sale Agreement dated July 1, 2016 between New England Institute of Technology at Palm Beach, Inc. and School Property Development Metrocentre, LLC
10.1(1) 
10.2(1)
Credit Agreement dated as of April 12, 201628, 2017 among Lincoln Educational Services Corporation, and Lincoln Technical Institute, Inc. and its subsidiaries, and Sterling National Bank
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
  
101**
The following financial statements from Lincoln Educational Services Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016,2017, formatted in XBRL: (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (ii)(iii) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iii)Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, and (v)(vi) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail.
 

 
(1)Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 18, 2016.May 4, 2017.

*Filed herewith.

**As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
 
 
38