UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

☒QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the quarterly period ended SeptemberJune 30, 2019
2020
 Or
☐TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 For the transition period from _____________ to _____________

Commission file number 001-31220

COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Kentucky61-0979818
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(IRS Employer Identification No.)

346 North Mayo Trail
P.O. Box 2947
Pikeville, Kentucky
41502
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)

(606)(606) 432-1414
(Registrant’s telephone number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Common Stock
(Title of class)

ctbiCTBINASDAQ
Nasdaq Global Select Market
(Trading symbol)(Name of exchange on which registered)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes  ✓☑
No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every interactive data file required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files.)files).

Yes  ✓☑
No



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ✓☑
Accelerated Filer  ☐
Non-accelerated Filer  ☐
   
Smaller Reporting Company ☐
Emerging Growth Company ☐
 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.        ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ☐
   No ✓☑

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date.

Common stock – 17,782,75217,802,012 shares outstanding at OctoberJuly 31, 20192020



CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain of the statements contained herein that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.’s (“CTBI”) actual results may differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by words or phrases such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,” “may increase,” “may fluctuate,” and similar expressions or future or conditional verbs such as “will,” “should,” “would,” and “could.” These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, economic conditions, portfolio growth, the credit performance of the portfolios, including bankruptcies, and seasonal factors; changes in general economic conditions including the performance of financial markets, prevailing inflation and interest rates, realized gains from sales of investments, gains from asset sales, and losses on commercial lending activities; the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business operations and credit quality and on general economic and financial market conditions, as well as our ability to respond to the related challenges; our participation in the Paycheck Protection Program administered by the Small Business Administration; results of various investment activities; the effects of competitors’ pricing policies, changes in laws and regulations, competition, and demographic changes on target market populations’ savings and financial planning needs; industry changes in information technology systems on which we are highly dependent; failure of acquisitions to produce revenue enhancements or cost savings at levels or within the time frames originally anticipated or unforeseen integration difficulties; and the resolution of legal  proceedings and related matters.  In addition, the banking industry in general is subject to various monetary, operational, and fiscal policies and regulations, which include, but are not limited to, those determined by the Federal Reserve Board, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and state regulators, whose policies, regulations, and enforcement actions could affect CTBI’s results.  These statements are representative only on the date hereof, and CTBI undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements made.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The accompanying information has not been audited by our independent registered public accountants; however, in the opinion of management such information reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim period.  All such adjustments are of a normal and recurring nature.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and consequently do not include all of the disclosures normally required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America or those normally made in the Registrant’s annual report on Form 10-K.  Accordingly, the reader of the Form 10-Q should refer to the Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 20182019 for further information in this regard.


2
1
Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(dollars in thousands) 
(unaudited)
September 30
2019
  
December 31
2018
  
(unaudited)
June 30
2020
  
December 31
2019
 
Assets:            
Cash and due from banks $68,472  $64,632  $63,194  $58,680 
Interest bearing deposits  153,349   75,718   414,891   206,003 
Federal funds sold  0   1,100 
Cash and cash equivalents  221,821   141,450   478,085   264,683 
                
Certificates of deposit in other banks  245   3,920   245   245 
Securities available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost of $643,164 and $602,114, respectively)  649,976   593,746 
Securities held-to-maturity at amortized cost (fair value of $517 and $649, respectively)  517   649 
Debt securities available-for-sale at fair value (amortized cost of $725,392 and $593,945, respectively)  740,479   599,844 
Debt securities held-to-maturity at amortized cost (fair value of $0 and $517, respectively)  0   517 
Equity securities at fair value  1,743   1,173   2,094   1,953 
Loans held for sale  1,943   2,461   28,987   1,167 
                
Loans  3,214,785   3,208,638   3,538,770   3,248,664 
Allowance for loan and lease losses  (34,811)  (35,908)
Allowance for credit losses*  (46,634)  (35,096)
Net loans  3,179,974   3,172,730   3,492,136   3,213,568 
                
Premises and equipment, net  44,223   45,291   42,810   44,046 
Right-of-use asset  14,702   0   13,867   14,550 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock  10,794   14,713   10,408   10,474 
Federal Reserve Bank stock  4,887   4,887   4,887   4,887 
Goodwill  65,490   65,490   65,490   65,490 
Bank owned life insurance  68,929   67,076   69,945   69,269 
Mortgage servicing rights  2,904   3,607   2,518   3,263 
Other real estate owned  19,833   27,273   17,675   19,480 
Accrued interest receivable  14,858   14,836 
Other assets  49,682   57,150   38,357   37,731 
Total assets $4,337,663  $4,201,616  $5,022,841  $4,366,003 
                
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:                
Deposits:                
Noninterest bearing $849,582  $803,316  $1,109,873  $865,760 
Interest bearing  2,539,973   2,502,634   2,862,436   2,539,812 
Total deposits  3,389,555   3,305,950   3,972,309   3,405,572 
                
Repurchase agreements  228,755   232,712   296,007   226,917 
Federal funds purchased  5,900   1,180   1,000   7,906 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  421   436   405   415 
Long-term debt  57,841   59,341   57,841   57,841 
Deferred taxes  4,286   3,363   4,678   5,110 
Operating lease liability  13,826   0   13,101   13,729 
Finance lease liability  1,460   0   1,449   1,456 
Accrued interest payable  4,508   2,839 
Other liabilities  30,101   34,484   39,696   29,332 
Total liabilities  3,732,145   3,637,466   4,390,994   3,751,117 
                
Shareholders’ equity:                
Preferred stock, 300,000 shares authorized and unissued  -   -   -   - 
Common stock, $5 par value, shares authorized 25,000,000; shares outstanding 2019 – 17,777,251; 2018 – 17,732,853  88,886   88,665 
Common stock, $5 par value, shares authorized 25,000,000; shares outstanding 2020 – 17,794,598; 2019 – 17,793,165  88,973   88,966 
Capital surplus  224,210   223,161   224,688   224,907 
Retained earnings  287,493   258,935   307,134   296,760 
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax  4,929   (6,611)
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax  11,052   4,253 
Total shareholders’ equity  605,518   564,150   631,847   614,886 
                
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $4,337,663  $4,201,616  $5,022,841  $4,366,003 

*Effective January 1, 2020, the allowance for loan and lease losses became the allowance for credit losses with the implementation of ASU 2016-13, commonly referred to as CECL.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

32

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income
(unaudited)

 
Three Months Ended
September 30
  
Nine Months Ended
September 30
  
Three Months Ended
June 30
  
Six Months Ended
June 30
 
(in thousands except per share data) 2019  2018  2019  2018  2020  2019  2020  2019 
Interest income:                        
Interest and fees on loans, including loans held for sale $41,781  $39,420  $124,009  $113,788  $41,264  $41,318  $81,729  $82,228 
Interest and dividends on securities                                
Taxable  3,086   2,422   9,338   7,314   2,867   3,089   5,913   6,252 
Tax exempt  552   699   1,810   2,102   596   580   1,123   1,258 
Interest and dividends on Federal Reserve Bank and Federal Home Loan Bank stock  207   341   764   1,002   138   261   278   557 
Interest on Federal Reserve Bank deposits  1,330   659   3,641   1,811   88   1,525   584   2,311 
Other, including interest on federal funds sold  31   66   131   195   15   44   40   100 
Total interest income  46,987   43,607   139,693   126,212   44,968   46,817   89,667   92,706 
                                
Interest expense:                                
Interest on deposits  8,649   6,051   25,680   16,508   5,312   8,956   12,254   17,031 
Interest on repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased  1,169   818   3,516   2,176   777   1,191   1,781   2,347 
Interest on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  0   3   39   7   0   0   0   39 
Interest on long-term debt  650   599   1,929   1,646   417   643   926   1,279 
Total interest expense  10,468   7,471   31,164   20,337   6,506   10,790   14,961   20,696 
                                
Net interest income  36,519   36,136   108,529   105,875   38,462   36,027   74,706   72,010 
Provision for loan losses  1,253   1,543   3,006   4,418 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  35,266   34,593   105,523   101,457 
Provision for credit losses*  (49)  1,563   12,658   1,753 
Net interest income after provision for credit losses  38,511   34,464   62,048   70,257 
                                
Noninterest income:                                
Service charges on deposit accounts  6,859   6,671   19,504   19,372   4,967   6,525   10,883   12,645 
Gains on sales of loans, net  450   319   1,298   902   1,753   518   2,236   848 
Trust and wealth management income  2,725   2,836   8,065   8,650   2,569   2,765   5,453   5,340 
Loan related fees  622   1,022   1,635   3,085   822   440   917   1,013 
Bank owned life insurance  590   555   1,837   3,112   564   689   1,137   1,247 
Brokerage revenue  418   331   978   1,054   313   299   685   560 
Securities gains (losses)  14   (2)  574   (288)
Securities gains  937   204   1,186   560 
Other noninterest income  711   931   2,920   3,826   954   812   1,903   2,209 
Total noninterest income  12,389   12,663   36,811   39,713   12,879   12,252   24,400   24,422 
                
Noninterest expense:                                
Officer salaries and employee benefits  2,812   3,475   9,483   9,909   3,104   3,297   5,855   6,671 
Other salaries and employee benefits  12,208   11,789   37,583   36,396   12,049   12,790   24,329   25,375 
Occupancy, net  2,031   2,019   5,894   6,178   1,938   1,812   3,923   3,863 
Equipment  776   725   2,264   2,169   686   749   1,407   1,488 
Data processing  1,987   1,695   5,539   4,965   1,875   1,789   3,853   3,552 
Bank franchise tax  1,656   1,618   5,054   4,896   1,812   1,683   3,624   3,398 
Legal fees  555   373   1,409   1,275   496   424   973   854 
Professional fees  577   507   1,654   1,504   514   546   1,083   1,077 
Advertising and marketing  894   744   2,560   2,352   568   874   1,202   1,666 
FDIC insurance  (280)  314   266   907   294   369   441   546 
Other real estate owned provision and expense  2,476   1,094   4,271   3,348   601   1,024   1,470   1,795 
Repossession expense  334   246   823   959   175   112   310   489 
Amortization of limited partnership investments  745   609   2,688   1,825   920   1,166   1,808   1,943 
Other noninterest expense  3,111   2,898   9,507   12,543   2,877   3,395   5,852   6,396 
Total noninterest expense  29,882   28,106   88,995   89,226   27,909   30,030   56,130   59,113 
                                
Income before income taxes  17,773   19,150   53,339   51,944   23,481   16,686   30,318   35,566 
Income taxes  2,504   3,044   4,807   8,425   3,829   (1,638)  4,087   2,303 
Net income  15,269   16,106   48,532   43,519   19,652   18,324   26,231   33,263 
                                
Other comprehensive income (loss):                
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available-for-sale:                
Unrealized holding gains (losses) arising during the period  2,538   (2,521)  15,184   (9,830)
Less: Reclassification adjustments for realized gains (losses) included in net income
  (2)  (2)  4   149 
Tax expense (benefit)  664   (529)  3,640   (2,096)
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax  1,876   (1,990)  11,540   (7,883)
Other comprehensive income:                
Unrealized holding gains on debt securities available-for-sale:                
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period  8,086   6,522   10,233   12,646 
Less: Reclassification adjustments for realized gains included in net income  564   5   1,045   6 
Tax expense  1,956   1,690   2,389   2,976 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax  5,566   4,827   6,799   9,664 
Comprehensive income $17,145  $14,116  $60,072  $35,636  $25,218  $23,151  $33,030  $42,927 
                                
Basic earnings per share $0.86  $0.91  $2.74  $2.46  $1.11  $1.03  $1.48  $1.88 
Diluted earnings per share $0.86  $0.91  $2.74  $2.46  $1.11  $1.03  $1.48  $1.88 
                                
Weighted average shares outstanding-basic  17,726   17,691   17,720   17,683   17,739   17,721   17,746   17,717 
Weighted average shares outstanding-diluted  17,743   17,710   17,733   17,700   17,742   17,733   17,753   17,728 

*Effective January 1, 2020, the provision for loan losses became the provision for credit losses with the implementation of ASU 2016-13, commonly referred to as CECL.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

43

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Quarterly

(in thousands except per share and share amounts) 
Common
Shares
  
Common
Stock
  
Capital
Surplus
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Total 
Balance, June 30, 2018  17,725,313  $88,626  $222,486  $239,955  $(8,892) $542,175 
Net income              16,106       16,106 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax of ($529)                  (1,990)  (1,990)
Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per share)              (6,370)      (6,370)
Issuance of common stock  3,939   21   182           203 
Forfeiture of restricted stock  (1,177)  (6)  6           0 
Stock-based compensation          140           140 
Balance, September 30, 2018  17,728,075  $88,641  $222,814  $249,691  $(10,882) $550,264 
(in thousands except per share and share amounts) 
Common
Shares
  
Common
Stock
  
Capital
Surplus
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Total 
Balance, March 31, 2020  17,787,274   88,936   224,277   294,223   5,486   612,922 
Net income              19,652       19,652 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of
 $1,956
                  5,566   5,566 
Cash dividends declared ($0.38 per share)              (6,741)      (6,741)
Issuance of common stock  7,585   38   187           225 
Vesting of restricted stock  (261)  (1)  1           0 
Stock-based compensation          223           223 
Balance, June 30, 2020  17,794,598  $88,973  $224,688  $307,134  $11,052  $631,847 

(in thousands except per share and share amounts) 
Common
Shares
  
Common
Stock
  
Capital
Surplus
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Total  
Common
Shares
  
Common
Stock
  
Capital
Surplus
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Total 
Balance, June 30, 2019  17,772,309  $88,862  $223,833  $278,960  $3,053  $594,708 
Balance, March 31, 2019  17,767,594   88,839   223,426   267,016   (1,774)  577,507 
Net income              15,269       15,269               18,324       18,324 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $664                  1,876   1,876 
Cash dividends declared ($0.38 per share)              (6,736)      (6,736)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of
$1,690
                  4,827   4,827 
Cash dividends declared ($0.36 per share)              (6,380)      (6,380)
Issuance of common stock  4,942   24   183           207   5,718   28   188           216 
Vesting of restricted stock  (474)  (2)  2           0 
Forfeiture of restricted stock  0   0   0           0   (529)  (3)  3           0 
Stock-based compensation          194           194           214           214 
Balance, September 30, 2019  17,777,251  $88,886  $224,210  $287,493  $4,929  $605,518 
Balance, June 30, 2019  17,772,309  $88,862  $223,833  $278,960  $3,053  $594,708 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity
Year-to-Date

(in thousands except per share and share amounts) 
Common
Shares
  
Common
Stock
  
Capital
Surplus
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2019  17,793,165  $88,966  $224,907  $296,760  $4,253  $614,886 
Implementation of ASU 2016-13              (2,366)      (2,366)
Balance, January 1, 2020  17,793,165   88,966   224,907   294,394   4,253   612,520 
Net income              26,231       26,231 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $2,389                  6,799   6,799 
Cash dividends declared ($0.76 per share)              (13,491)      (13,491)
Issuance of common stock  29,538   148   309           457 
Repurchase of common stock  (32,664)  (164)  (935)          (1,099)
Issuance of restricted stock  21,544   108   (108)          0 
Vesting of restricted stock  (16,985)  (85)  85           0 
Stock-based compensation          430           430 
Balance, June 30, 2020  17,794,598  $88,973  $224,688  $307,134  $11,052  $631,847 

(in thousands except per share and share amounts) 
Common
Shares
  
Common
Stock
  
Capital
Surplus
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2018  17,732,853  $88,665  $223,161  $258,935  $(6,611) $564,150 
Implementation of ASU 2016-02              (480)  0   (480)
Balance, January 1, 2019  17,732,853   88,665   223,161   258,455   (6,611)  563,670 
Net income              33,263       33,263 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $2,976                  9,664   9,664 
Cash dividends declared ($0.72 per share)              (12,758)      (12,758)
Issuance of common stock  24,783   123   351           474 
Issuance of restricted stock  27,921   140   (140)          0 
Vesting of restricted stock  (12,660)  (63)  63           0 
Forfeiture of restricted stock  (588)  (3)  3           0 
Stock-based compensation          395           395 
Balance, June 30, 2019  17,772,309  $88,862  $223,833  $278,960  $3,053  $594,708 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ EquityCash Flows
Year-to-Date(unaudited)

(in thousands except per share and share amounts) 
Common
Shares
  
Common
Stock
  
Capital
Surplus
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2017  17,692,912  $88,465  $221,472  $224,268  $(3,506) $530,699 
Net income              43,519       43,519 
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax of ($2,096)                  (7,883)  (7,883)
Cash dividends declared ($1.02 per share)              (18,042)      (18,042)
Issuance of common stock  37,017   185   818           1,003 
Issuance of restricted stock  11,435   57   (57)          0 
Vesting of restricted stock  (11,997)  (60)  60           0 
Forfeiture of restricted stock  (1,292)  (6)  6           0 
Stock-based compensation          515           515 
Implementation of ASU 2014-09              453       453 
Implementation of ASU 2016-01              (507)  507   0 
Balance, September 30, 2018  17,728,075  $88,641  $222,814  $249,691  $(10,882) $550,264 
 
Six Months Ended
June 30
 
(in thousands) 2020  2019 
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net income $26,231  $33,263 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  2,719   2,689 
Deferred taxes  (2,034)  (2,588)
Stock-based compensation  472   432 
Provision for credit losses*  12,658   1,753 
Write-downs of other real estate owned  764   1,181 
Gains on sale of mortgage loans held for sale  (2,236)  (848)
Securities gains, net  (1,045)  (6)
Change in fair market value of equity securities  (141)  (554)
Gains (losses) on sale of assets, net  (30)  38 
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale  104,642   44,665 
Funding of mortgage loans held for sale  (130,226)  (42,423)
Amortization of securities premiums and discounts, net  2,416   2,361 
Change in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance  (676)  (843)
Payment of operating lease liabilities  (855)  (848)
Mortgage servicing rights:        
Fair value adjustments  1,305   795 
New servicing assets created  (560)  (307)
Changes in:        
Accrued interest receivable  (22)  (491)
Other assets  (626)  (11,422)
Accrued interest payable  1,669   (2,698)
Other liabilities  10,197   (2,513)
Net cash provided by operating activities  24,622   21,636 
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Certificates of deposit in other banks:        
Maturity of certificates of deposit  0   3,675 
Securities available-for-sale (AFS):        
Purchase of AFS securities  (376,320)  (111,117)
Proceeds from the sales of AFS securities  64,293   25,734 
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities of AFS securities  179,209   97,829 
Securities held-to-maturity (HTM):        
Proceeds from maturities of HTM securities  517   30 
Change in loans, net  (294,547)  15,176 
Purchase of premises and equipment  (573)  (1,042)
Proceeds from sale and retirement of premises and equipment  0   13 
Redemption of stock by Federal Home Loan Bank  66   3,353 
Proceeds from sale of other real estate and repossessed assets  1,351   2,123 
Proceeds from settlement of bank owned life insurance  0   615 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (426,004)  36,389 
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Change in deposits, net  566,737   131,231 
Change in repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased, net  62,184   3,246 
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances  25,000   30,000 
Payments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  (25,010)  (30,010)
Payment of finance lease liabilities  (7)  (7)
Issuance of common stock  457   474 
Repurchase of common stock  (1,099)  0 
Dividends paid  (13,478)  (12,770)
Net cash provided by financing activities  614,784   122,164 
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents  213,402   180,189 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  264,683   141,450 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $478,085  $321,639 
         
Supplemental disclosures:        
Income taxes paid
 $8,645  $6,500 
Interest paid  13,292   18,218 
Non-cash activities:        
Loans to facilitate the sale of other real estate owned  1,582   2,650 
Common stock dividends accrued, paid in subsequent quarter  233   208 
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans  1,862   1,242 

(in thousands except per share and share amounts) 
Common
Shares
  
Common
Stock
  
Capital
Surplus
  
Retained
Earnings
  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss),
Net of Tax
  Total 
Balance, December 31, 2018  17,732,853  $88,665  $223,161  $258,935  $(6,611) $564,150 
Net income              48,532       48,532 
Other comprehensive income, net of tax of $3,640                  11,540   11,540 
Cash dividends declared ($1.10 per share)              (19,494)      (19,494)
Issuance of common stock  29,725   148   533           681 
Issuance of restricted stock  27,921   140   (140)          0 
Vesting of restricted stock  (12,660)  (64)  64           0 
Forfeiture of restricted stock  (588)  (3)  3           0 
Stock-based compensation          589           589 
Implementation of ASU 2016-02              (480)  0   (480)
Balance, September 30, 2019  17,777,251  $88,886  $224,210  $287,493  $4,929  $605,518 
*Effective January 1,2020, the provision for loan losses became the provision for credit losses with the implementation of ASU 2016-13, commonly referred to as CECL.

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(unaudited)

 
Nine Months Ended
September 30
 
(in thousands) 2019  2018 
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net income $48,532  $43,519 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:        
Depreciation and amortization  4,132   2,853 
Deferred taxes  (2,586)  159 
Stock-based compensation  645   553 
Provision for loan losses  3,006   4,418 
Write-downs of other real estate owned and other repossessed assets  3,353   1,990 
Gains on sale of mortgage loans held for sale  (1,298)  (902)
Securities (gains) losses, net  (4)  288 
Change in fair market value of equity securities  (570)  0 
Gain on debt repurchase  (219)  0 
(Gains) losses on sale of assets, net  359   (107)
Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans held for sale  65,893   40,284 
Funding of mortgage loans held for sale  (64,077)  (39,378)
Amortization of securities premiums and discounts, net  3,720   3,648 
Change in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance  (1,227)  (2,563)
Payment of operating lease liabilities  (1,255)  0 
Mortgage servicing rights:        
Fair value adjustments  1,149   (2)
New servicing assets created  (446)  (329)
Changes in:        
Other assets  7,422   (11,904)
Other liabilities  (4,439)  9,497 
Net cash provided by operating activities  62,090   52,024 
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Certificates of deposit in other banks:        
Maturity of certificates of deposit  3,675   4,655 
Securities available-for-sale (AFS):        
Purchase of AFS securities  (194,884)  (144,177)
Proceeds from the sales of AFS securities  25,734   57,079 
Proceeds from prepayments and maturities of AFS securities  124,384   89,735 
Securities held-to-maturity (HTM):        
Proceeds from maturities of HTM securities  132   0 
Change in loans, net  (9,319)  (60,707)
Purchase of premises and equipment  (1,825)  (2,343)
Proceeds from sale and retirement of premises and equipment  46   23 
Redemption of stock by Federal Home Loan Bank  3,919   3,214 
Proceeds from sale of other real estate and repossessed assets  2,797   1,491 
Additional investment in bank owned life insurance  (1,241)  0 
Proceeds from settlement of bank owned life insurance  615   1,202 
Net cash used in investing activities  (45,967)  (49,828)
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Change in deposits, net  83,605   9,783 
Change in repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased, net  763   1,162 
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances  30,000   0 
Payments on advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  (30,015)  (58)
Payment of finance lease liabilities  (11)  0 
Repurchase of long-term debt  (1,281)  0 
Issuance of common stock  681   1,003 
Dividends paid  (19,494)  (18,027)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  64,248   (6,137)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  80,371   (3,941)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  141,450   175,274 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $221,821  $171,333 
         
Supplemental disclosures:        
Income taxes paid $8,784  $8,700 
Interest paid  27,408   18,185 
Non-cash activities:        
Loans to facilitate the sale of other real estate owned and repossessed assets  2,820   2,680 
Common stock dividends accrued, paid in subsequent quarter  220   220 
Real estate acquired in settlement of loans  1,889   3,692 

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc.
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies


In the opinion of management, the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments (which consist of normal recurring adjustments) necessary, to present fairly the condensed consolidated financial position as of SeptemberJune 30, 2019,2020, the results of operations, other comprehensive income, and changes in shareholders’ equity, for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and 2018,2019.  and the cash flows for the ninesix months ended September 30, 2019June 30,2020 and 2018.2019. In accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information, these statements do not include certain information and footnote disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete annual financial statements.  The results of operations for the three  and ninesix months ended September 30,June 30,2020 and 2019 and 2018 and the cash flows for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and 20182019 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.  The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 20182019 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) for that period.  For further information, refer to the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, included in our annual report on Form 10-K.


Principles of Consolidation – The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of CTBI and its separate and distinct, wholly owned subsidiaries Community Trust Bank, Inc. (“CTB”) and Community Trust and Investment Company (“CTIC”).  All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.


Reclassifications – Certain reclassifications considered to be immaterial have been made in the prior year condensed consolidated financial statements to conform to current year classifications.  These reclassifications had no effect on net income.


New Accounting Standards –


➢          Leases – In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 establishes a right-of-use model that requires a lessee to record a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all leases with terms longer than 12 months.  Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement.  For lessors, the guidance modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases.  A lease will be treated as a sale if it transfers all of the risks and rewards, as well as control of the underlying asset, to the lessee.  If risks and rewards are conveyed without the transfer of control, the lease is treated as a financing. If the lessor does not convey risks and rewards or control, an operating lease results.  The amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years for public business entities.  Entities are required to use a modified retrospective approach for leases that exist or are entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period in the financial statements, with certain practical expedients available.


In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, Leases (Topic 842):  Targeted Improvements.  This ASU is intended to reduce costs and ease implementation of the leases standard for financial statement preparers.  ASU 2018-11 provides a new transition method and a practical expedient for separating components of a contract.

Transition: Comparative Reporting at Adoption


The amendments in ASU 2018-11 provide entities with an additional (and optional) transition method to adopt the new leases standard.  Under this new transition method, an entity initially applies the new leases standard at the adoption date and recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption consistent with preparers’ requests.  Consequently, an entity’s reporting for the comparative periods presented in the financial statements in which it adopts the new leases standard will continue to be in accordance with current GAAP in Topic 840, Leases.  An entity that elects this additional (and optional) transition method must provide the required Topic 840 disclosures for all periods that continue to be in accordance with Topic 840.  The amendments do not change the existing disclosure requirements in Topic 840 (for example, they do not create interim disclosure requirements that entities previously were not required to provide).

8
Separating Components of a Contract


The amendments in ASU 2018-11 provide lessors with a practical expedient, by class of underlying asset, to not separate non-lease components from the associated lease component and, instead, to account for those components as a single component if the non-lease components otherwise would be accounted for under the new revenue guidance (Topic 606) and both of the following are met:

The timing and pattern of transfer of the non-lease component(s) and associated lease component are the same.
The lease component, if accounted for separately, would be classified as an operating lease.


An entity electing this practical expedient (including an entity that accounts for the combined component entirely in Topic 606) is required to disclose certain information, by class of underlying asset, as specified in the ASU.


We elected the optional transition method of the modified retrospective approach provided in ASU 2018-11 which was applied on January 1, 2019.  CTBI also elected certain relief options offered in ASU 2016-02, including the package of practical expedients, the option not to separate lease and non-lease components, and instead to account for them as a single lease component for all classes of assets, the hindsight practical expedient to allow entities to use hindsight when determining lease term and impairment of right-of-use assets, and the option not to recognize right-of-use assets and lease liabilities that arise from short-term leases (i.e., leases with terms of twelve months or less).  Refer to note 6, Leases, below for further information regarding the impact of adoption.


➢Accounting for Credit Losses – In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.  This ASU is commonly referred to as “CECL” (Current Expected Credit Loss).  The provisions of ASU 2016-13 were issued to provide financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments that are not accounted for at fair value through net income, including loans held for investment, held-to-maturity debt securities, trade and other receivables, net investment in leases and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date.  This ASU requires that financial assets measured at amortized cost be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis.  The amendments in ASU 2016-13 eliminate the probable incurred loss recognition in current GAAP and reflect an entity’s current estimate of all expected credit losses.  The measurement of expected credit losses is based upon historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the financial assets.  The standard also included revisions and updates to the required footnote disclosures.   Please refer to Note 4 below.


For purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination (“PCD assets”) that are measured at amortized cost, the initial allowance for credit losses is added to the purchase price rather than being reported as a credit loss expense.  Subsequent changes in the allowance for credit losses on PCD assets are recognized through the statement of income as a credit loss expense.


Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities will beare recorded through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a direct write-down to the security.  Management estimates potential losses on unfunded commitments, which are not unconditionally cancellable by CTBI, by calculating an anticipated funding rate based on internal data and applies an estimated loss factor to the amounts expected to be funded.  CTBI maintains an unfunded commitment allowance as part of other liabilities.  The impact of the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13 was an increase of $112 thousand to this allowance and an $84 thousand impact to equity, net of tax.

97


ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019.  Early adoptionCTB elected ASU 2019-04 which allows that accrued interest will continue to be presented separately and not part of amortized cost on loans.  The difference in amortized cost basis versus consideration of loan balances impacts the ACL calculation by 1 basis point and is permittedconsidered immaterial.  The primary difference is for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018.indirect lending premiums.  Per ASC 326-20-30-2, if a loan does not share risk characteristics with other pooled loans, then the loan shall be evaluated for expected credit losses on an individual basis.  In determining what loans should be evaluated individually, CTBI has established that any loan with a balance of $1 million or greater that has one of the following characteristics with be individually evaluated:  has a criticized risk rating, is in nonaccrual status, is a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”), or is 90 days or more past due.


Loans that meet the above criteria will be tested individually for loss exposure on a quarterly basis using a fair market value of the collateral securing the loan less estimated selling costs as compared to the recorded investment of the loan (principal plus interest owed unless in a nonaccrual status).  As an alternative, loans that are dependent upon the cash flows from business operations may be tested by determining the net present value of future cash flows discounted by the effective interest rate of the loan over the remaining term of the loan as appropriate.  A specific valuation reserve will be established for any individually tested loans that have loss exposure unless a charge-down of the loan balance is more appropriate.


As previously disclosed, CTBI formed an implementation team working throughto oversee the provisionsadoption of the ASU 2016-13 including assessing the impact on its accounting and disclosures.  The implementation team was a cross-functional working group comprised of individuals from areas including credit, finance, and operations.  The team has established the historical data that will be available and has identified the potential loan segments to be analyzed.  Credit losses for loans that no longer share similar risk characteristics are estimated on an individual basis.  The team has determined the portfolio methodologies and relevant economic factors to be utilized and will beginbegan running parallel with its current model as part of the monthly fourth quarter 2019 loan portfolio analysis.The team has developed a CECL allowance model which calculates reserves over the life of the loan and is largely driven by historical losses, portfolio characteristics, risk-grading, economic outlook, and other qualitative factors.  The methodologies utilize a single economic forecast over a twelve month reasonable and supportable forecast period with immediate reversion to historical losses.  CTBI adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2020 using the modified retrospective approach.  The effect of adoption was a $3.0 million increase in the allowance for credit losses (formerly referred to as the allowance for loan losses) and a $112 thousand increase in other liabilities for off-balance sheet credit exposure with a related decrease in shareholders’ equity of $2.4 million, net of deferred tax.  The table below shows the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 by major loan classifications:

 
December 31, 2019
Probable Incurred Losses
  
January 1, 2020
CECL Adoption
 
(dollars in thousands) Amount  % of Portfolio  Amount  % of Portfolio 
Allowance for loan and lease losses transitioned to allowance for credit losses:            
Commercial $21,683   1.30% $21,680   1.30%
Residential mortgage  5,501   0.61%  7,319   0.81%
Consumer direct  1,711   1.16%  1,671   1.13%
Consumer indirect  6,201   1.18%  7,467   1.42%
Total allowance for loan and lease losses/allowance for credit losses $35,096   1.08% $38,137   1.17%
                 
Reserve for unfunded lending commitments $274      $386     

8


In December 2018, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”), and the FDIC (the “FDIC” and, together with the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, the “federal banking regulators”) approved a final rule to address changes to credit loss accounting under GAAP, including banking organizations’ implementation of CECL.  The final rule provided banking organizations the option to phase in over a three-year period the day-one adverse effects on regulatory capital that may result from the adoption of the new accounting standard.


On March 27, 2020, pursuant to the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”), federal banking regulators issued an interim final rule that delays the estimated impact on regulatory capital stemming from the implementation of CECL for a transition period of up to five years (the “CECL IFR”).  The CECL IFR provides banking organizations that are required (as of January 1, 2020) to adopt CECL for accounting purposes under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles during 2020 an option to delay an estimate of CECL’s impact on regulatory capital.  The capital relief in the CECL IFR is calibrated to approximate the difference in allowances under CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology for the first two years of the transition period.  The cumulative difference at the end of the second year of the transition period is then phased in to regulatory capital over a three-year transition period.  In this way, the CECL IFR gradually phases in the full effect of CECL on regulatory capital, providing a five-year transition period.  CTBI adopted CECL effective January 1, 2020 and chose the option to delay the estimated impact on regulatory capital using the relief options described above.


➢         Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment – In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) – Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.  These amendments eliminate Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test.  The amendments also eliminate the requirements from any reporting unit with a zero or negative carrying amount to perform a qualitative assessment and, if it fails that qualitative test, to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test.  An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary.  The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods with those fiscal years.  ASU 2017-04 shouldyears, to be implemented on a prospective basis.  Management does not expectCTBI adopted ASU 2017-04 to have anwith no impact on CTBI’sour consolidated financial statements.


➢         Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement – In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)—Disclosure Framework—Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement.  ASU No. 2018-13 modifies the disclosure requirements on fair value measurements in Topic 820 as follows:

9

Removals


The following disclosure requirements were removed from Topic 820:

The amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy
The policy for timing of transfers between levels
The valuation processes for Level 3 fair value measurements

Modifications


The following disclosure requirements were modified in Topic 820:

For investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value, an entity is required to disclose the timing of liquidation of an investee’s assets and the date when restrictions from redemption might lapse only if the investee has communicated the timing to the entity or announced the timing publicly; and
The amendments clarify that the measurement uncertainty disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date.

Additions


The following disclosure requirements were added to Topic 820:

The changes in unrealized gains and losses for the period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3 fair value measurements held at the end of the reporting period; and
The range and weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements.  For certain unobservable inputs, an entity may disclose other quantitative information (such as the median or arithmetic average) in lieu of the weighted average if the entity determines that other quantitative information would be a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements.

10

In addition, the amendments eliminate “at a minimum” from the phrase “an entity shall disclose at a minimum” to promote the appropriate exercise of discretion by entities when considering fair value measurement disclosures and to clarify that materiality is an appropriate consideration of entities and their auditors when evaluating disclosure requirements.


CTBI plans to adoptadopted ASU 2018-13 effective January 1, 2020 with minimal changes to our current reporting.


➢         Accounting for Costs of Implementing a Cloud Computing Service Agreement– In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, Intangibles—Goodwill and Other—Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40):  Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract, which reduces complexity for the accounting for costs of implementing a cloud computing service arrangement.  This standard aligns the accounting for implementation costs of hosting arrangements, regardless of whether they convey a license to the hosted software.


The ASU aligns the following requirements for capitalizing implementation costs:

Those incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract, and
Those incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license).


This ASU will bewas effective beginning January 1, 2020 with no significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

10


➢Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes – In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740), Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes.  The amendments in this ASU simplify the accounting for income taxes by removing the following exceptions:


1. Exception to the incremental approach for intra period tax allocation when there is a loss from continuing operations and income or a gain from other items (for example, discontinued operations or other comprehensive income);


2. Exception to the requirement to recognize a deferred tax liability for equity method investments when a foreign subsidiary becomes an equity method investment;


3. Exception to the ability not to recognize a deferred tax liability for a foreign subsidiary when a foreign equity method investment becomes a subsidiary; and


4. Exception to the general methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period when a year-to-date loss exceeds the anticipated loss for the year.


The amendments in this ASU also simplify the accounting for income taxes by doing the following:


1. Requiring that an entity recognize a franchise tax (or similar tax) that is partially based on income as an income-based tax and account for any incremental amount incurred as a non-income-based tax;


2. Requiring that an entity evaluate when a step up in the tax basis of goodwill should be considered part of the business combination in which the book goodwill was originally recognized and when it should be considered a separate transaction;


3. Specifying that an entity is not required to allocate the consolidated amount of current and deferred tax expense to a legal entity that is not subject to tax in its separate financial statements.  However, an entity may elect to do so (on an entity-by-entity basis) for a legal entity that is both not subject to tax and disregarded by the taxing authority;


4. Requiring that an entity reflect the effect of an enacted change in tax laws or rates in the annual effective tax rate computation in the interim period that includes the enactment date; and


5. Making minor codification improvements for income taxes related to employee stock ownership plans and investments in qualified affordable housing projects accounted for using the equity method.


For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020.  Early adoption is permitted.  We do not anticipate a significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.


➢Clarifying the Interactions between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815, a consensus of the FASB Emerging Task Force – In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-01, Investments—Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments—Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in this ASU clarify certain interactions between the guidance to account for certain equity securities under Topic 321, the guidance to account for investments under the equity method of accounting in Topic 323, and the guidance in Topic 815, which could change how an entity accounts for an equity security under the measurement alternative or a forward contract or purchased option to purchase securities that, upon settlement of the forward contract or exercise of the purchased option, would be accounted for under the equity method of accounting or the fair value option in accordance with Topic 825, Financial Instruments.  These amendments improve current GAAP by reducing diversity in practice and increasing comparability of the accounting for these interactions.  For public business entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years.  Early adoption is permitted for public business entities for periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued.  The amendments in this ASU should be applied prospectively.  Under a prospective transition, an entity should apply the amendments at the beginning of the interim period that includes the adoption date.  We do not anticipate a significant impact to our consolidated financial statements.

11


➢Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting – In April 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848) —Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting.  In response to concerns about structural risks of interbank offered rates, and, particularly, the risk of cessation of the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), regulators around the world have undertaken reference rate reform initiatives to identify alternative reference rates that are more observable or transaction-based and less susceptible to manipulation.  The amendments in this ASU provide optional guidance for a limited time to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects) of reference rate reform on financial reporting and provide optional expedients and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met.  This ASU applies only to contracts and hedging relationships that reference LIBOR or another reference rate expected to be discontinued due to reference rate reform.  The expedients and exceptions provided by the amendments do not apply to contract modifications made and hedging relationships entered into or evaluated after December 31, 2022.  The amendments in this ASU are elective and are effective upon issuance for all entities.  The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates


The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes.  Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates.  Such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.


We believe the application of accounting policies and the estimates required therein are reasonable.  These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change.  Historically, we have found our application of accounting policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from those determined using necessary estimates.


We have identified the following critical accounting policies:


Investments–Management determines the classification of securities at purchase.  We classify debt securities into held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale categories.  Held-to-maturity securities are those which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost.  In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 320, Investments – Debt Securities, investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity shall be classified in one of the following categories and measured at fair value in the statement of financial position:

a. Trading securities. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term (thus held for only a short period of time) shall be classified as trading securities. Trading generally reflects active and frequent buying and selling, and trading securities are generally used with the objective of generating profits on short-term differences in price.

b. Available-for-sale securities. Investments not classified as trading securities (nor as held-to-maturity securities) shall be classified as available-for-sale securities.

We do not have any securities that are classified as trading securities.  Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax.  If declines in fair value are other than temporary, the carrying value of the securities is written down to fair value as a realized loss with a charge to income for the portion attributable to credit losses and a charge to other comprehensive income for the portion that is not credit related.

1112


Gains or losses on disposition of debt securities are computed by specific identification for those securities.  Interest and dividend income, adjusted by amortization of purchase premium or discount, is included in earnings.


WhenWith the fair valueimplementation of CECL, an allowance will be recognized for credit losses relative to available-for-sale securities rather than as a security is below its amortizedreduction in the cost and depending on the length of time the condition exists and the extent the fair market value is below amortized cost, additional analysis is performed to determine whether an other than temporary impairment condition exists.  Available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities are analyzed quarterly for possible other than temporary impairment.  The analysis considers (i) whether we have the intent to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity.  Often, the information available to conduct these assessments is limited and rapidly changing, making estimates of fair value subject to judgment.  If actual information or conditions are different than estimated, the extentbasis of the impairmentsecurity.  Subsequent improvements in credit quality or reductions in estimated credit losses will be recognized immediately as a reversal of the security may be different than previously estimated,recorded allowance, which could have a material effect on CTBI’s resultsaligns the income statement recognition of operations and financial condition.credit losses with the reporting period in which changes occur.


SubsequentHeld-to-maturity (“HTM”) securities will be subject to the January 1, 2018 effective date of ASU 2016-01, ASC 320 applies only toCECL.  CECL will require an allowance on these held-to-maturity debt securities for lifetime expected credit losses, determined by adjusting historical loss information for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.  The forward-looking evaluation of lifetime expected losses will be performed on a pooled basis for debt securities that share similar risk characteristics.  These allowances for expected losses must be made by the holder of the HTM debt security when the security is purchased.  At June 30, 2020, CTBI held 0 securities designated as held-to-maturity.


CTBI accounts for equity securities in accordance with ASC 321, Investments – Equity Securities, applies to equity securities..  ASC 321 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method and those that result in the consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair values recognized in net income.


Equity securities with a readily determinable fair value are required to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through net income.  Equity securities without a readily determinable fair value are carried at cost, less any impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes for identical or similar investments.  An election can be made, asAs permitted by ASC 321-10-35-2, CTBI can make an irrevocable election to subsequently measure an equity security without a readily determinable fair value, and all identical or similar investments of the same issuer, including future purchases of identical or similar investments of the same issuer, at fair value.  Equity securities held by CTBI include securities without readily determinable fair values.  CTBI has elected to accountmade this election for these securities at fair value.its Visa Class B equity securities.  The fair value of these securities was determined by a third party service provider using Level 3 inputs as defined in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, and changes in fair value are recognized in income.


Loans–Loans with the ability and the intent to be held until maturity and/or payoff are reported at the carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest, an allowance for loan and lease losses, and unamortized deferred fees or costs.  Income is recorded on the level yield basis.  Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful.  Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest.  Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded once principal recovery is reasonably assured.  Loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments remain current for a period of time, generally six months, and future payments appear reasonably certain.  Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings that were classified as impaired.  A restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.


The provisions of the CARES Act included an election to not apply the guidance on accounting for troubled debt restructurings to loan modifications, such as extensions or deferrals, related to COVID-19 made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of (i) December 31, 2020 or (ii) 60 days after the end of the COVID-19 national emergency.  The relief can only be applied to modifications for borrowers that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019.  CTBI elected to adopt these provisions of the CARES Act.

13


Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net amount amortized over the estimated life of the related loans, leases, or commitments as a yield adjustment.

12

Allowance for LoanCredit Losses –FASB issued ASU 2016-13 in 2016 which introduced the current expected credit losses methodology (CECL) for estimating allowances for credit losses.  This accounting change was effective January 1, 2020.  CTBI measures expected credit losses of financial assets on a collective (pool) basis using loss-rate methods when the financial assets share similar risk characteristics.  Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis.  Regardless of an initial measurement method, once it is determined that foreclosure is probable, the allowance for credit losses is measured based on the fair value of the collateral as of the measurement date.  As a practical expedient, the fair value of the collateral may be used for a loan when determining the allowance for credit losses for which the repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty.  The fair value shall be adjusted for selling costs.  For collateral-dependent financial assets, the credit loss expected may be zero if the fair value less costs to sell exceed the amortized cost of the loan.  Loans shall not be included in both collective assessments and Lease Losses – individual assessments.


In the event that collection of principal becomes uncertain, CTBI has policies in place to reverse accrued interest in a timely manner.  Therefore, CTBI elected ASU 2019-04 which allows that accrued interest would continue to be presented separately and not part of amortized cost on loan.  The methodology used by CTBI is developed using the current loan balance, which is then compared to amortized cost balances to analyze the impact.  The difference in amortized cost basis versus consideration of loan balances impacts the allowance for credit losses calculation by 1 basis point and is considered immaterial.  The primary difference is for indirect lending premiums.


We maintain an allowance for loan and leasecredit losses (“ALLL”ACL”) at a level that is appropriate to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans, determined to be impaired, as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio.  Credit losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the ALLL.ACL.


We utilize an internal risk grading system for commercial credits.  Those larger commercial credits that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknessesmeet the following criteria are subject to individual review.evaluation: the loan has an outstanding bank share balance of $1 million or greater and (i) has a criticized risk rating, (ii) is in nonaccrual status, (iii) is a TDR, or (iv) is 90 days or more past due. The borrower’s cash flow, adequacy of collateral coverage, and other options available to CTBI, including legal remedies, are evaluated.  The review of individual loans includes those loans that are impaired as defined by ASC 310-10-35, Impairment of a Loan.  We evaluate the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for loss provision.  Historical loss rates are analyzed and applied to other commercial loansloan segments not subject to specific allocations.  The ALLL allocation for this pool of commercial loans is established based on the historical average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios.


A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CTBI will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.individual evaluation.


Homogenous loans, such as consumer installment, residential mortgages, and home equity lines are not individually risk graded.  The associated ALLLACL for these loans is measured in pools with similar risk characteristics under ASC 450, Contingencies.326.


When any secured commercial loan is considered uncollectable, whether past due or not, a current assessment of the value of the underlying collateral is made.  If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the collateral, the loan is placed on nonaccrual and the loan is charged down to the value of the collateral less estimated cost to sellsell. For commercial loans greater than $1million and classified as criticized, troubled debt restructuring, or nonaccrual, a specific reserve equalis established if a loss is determined to the difference between book value of the loanbe possible and the fair value assigned to the collateralthen charged-off once it is created until such time as the loan is foreclosed.probable.  When the foreclosed collateral has been legally assigned to CTBI, the estimated fair value of the collateral less costs to sell is then transferred to other real estate owned or other repossessed assets, and a charge-off is taken for any remaining balance.  When any unsecured commercial loan is considered uncollectable the loan is charged off no later than at 90 days past due.


All closed-end consumer loans (excluding conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate) are charged off no later than 120 days (5 monthly payments) delinquent.  If a loan is considered uncollectable, it is charged off earlier than 120 days delinquent.  For conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate, when a loan is 90 days past due, a current assessment of the value of the real estate is made.  If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the property, the loan is placed on nonaccrual.  Foreclosure proceedings are normally initiated after 120 days.  When the foreclosed property has been legally assigned to CTBI, the fair value less estimated costs to sell is transferred to other real estate owned and the remaining balance is taken as a charge-off.

14


Historical loss rates for loans are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition.  We use 12 rolling quartersWith the implementation of ASC 326, weighted average life (“WAL”) calculations were completed as a tool to determine the life of CTBI’s various loan segments.  Vintage modeling was used to determine the life of loan losses for our historical loss rate analysis.  Factors that we considerconsumer and residential real estate loans.  Static pool modeling was used to determine the life of loan losses for commercial loan segments.  Qualitative factors used to derive CTBI’s total ACL include delinquency trends, current economic conditions and trends, strength of supervision and administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans, level of recoveries to prior year’s charge-offs, trends in loan losses, industry concentrations and their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans, and underwriting exceptions.  With the implementation of ASC 326, forecasting factors including unemployment rates and industry specific forecasts for industries in which our total exposure is 5% of capital or greater are also included as factors in the ACL model.  Management continually reevaluates the other subjective factors included in its ALLLACL analysis.


13
Troubled Debt Restructurings – Troubled debt restructurings are certain loans that have been modified where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions.  Modifications of terms for our loans and their inclusion as troubled debt restructurings are based on individual facts and circumstances.  Loan modifications that are included as troubled debt restructurings may involve either an increase or reduction of the interest rate, extension of the term of the loan, or deferral of principal and/or interest payments, regardless of the period of the modification.  All of the loans identified as troubled debt restructuring were modified due to financial stress of the borrower.  In order to determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed to determine the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification.  This evaluation is performed under CTBI’s internal underwriting policy.


When we modify loans and leases in a troubled debt restructuring, we evaluate any possible impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, or use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If we determined that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance. In periods subsequent to modification, we evaluate troubled debt restructurings, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognize impairment through the allowance.


Other Real Estate Owned – When foreclosed properties are acquired, appraisals are obtained and the properties are booked at the current fair market value less expected sales costs.  Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties.  When an updated appraisal reflects a fair market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new fair market value less expected sales costs.  Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months but generally not more than 24 months.  All revenues and expenses related to the carrying of other real estate owned are recognized through the income statement.


Income Taxes – Income tax expense is based on the taxes due on the consolidated tax return plus deferred taxes based on the expected future tax benefits and consequences of temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates.  Any interest and penalties incurred in connection with income taxes are recorded as a component of income tax expense in the consolidated financial statements.  During the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and 2018,2019, CTBI has not recognized a significant amount of interest expense or penalties in connection with income taxes.


As a bank doing business in Kentucky, CTB is subject to a capital-based Kentucky bank franchise tax and exempt from Kentucky corporate income tax.  However, in March 2019, Kentucky enacted HB354, which will transition CTB from the bank franchise tax to a corporate income tax beginning January 1, 2021.  The current Kentucky corporate income tax rate is 5%.  As of March 31, 2019, CTBI recorded a deferred tax liability, net of the federal benefit, of $1.0 million due to the enactment of HB354.
15


In April 2019, Kentucky enacted HB458.  HB458 allows for combined state income tax filing with CTBI, CTB, and CTIC.  CTBI had previously filed a separate company return and generated net operating losses, in which it had maintained a valuation allowance against the related deferred tax asset.  HB458 also allows for certain net operating losses to be utilized on a combined return.  CTBI expects to file a combined return, beginning in 2021, and to utilize these previously generated losses.  The tax benefit recorded in the second quarter 2019 to reverse the valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset for these losses was $3.6 million. 


Note 2 – Stock-Based Compensation


There was 0 compensation expense related to stock option grants for the three months ended June 30, 2020.  CTBI’s compensation expense related to stock option grants was $8$2 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and $10 thousand and $29$21 thousand, respectively, for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2019, and $11 thousand  and $74 thousand for2019.  As of June 30, 2020, there was 0 unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards, as all stock option awards have fully vested.  There were 0 stock options granted in the three and ninefirst six months ended September 30, 2018.  of 2020 or 2019.


Restricted stock expense for the three months and nine monthssix ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 was $205$244 thousand and $616$470 thousand, respectively, including $19$21 thousand and $56$42 thousand in dividends paid for each period.  Restricted stock expense for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20182019 was $143$222 thousand and $479$411 thousand, respectively, including $13$18 thousand and $38$37 thousand in dividends paid for each period.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2019,2020, there was a total of $9 thousand of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested stock option awards that will be recognized as expense as the awards vest over a weighted average period of 0.3 years and a total of $1.6$1.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock grants that will be recognized as expense as the awards vest over a weighted average period of 2.72.8 years.


  NaN shares of restricted stock were granted during the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.  There were 0 stock options granted in the first nine months of both 201921,544 and 2018.  There were 27,921 and 11,320 shares of restricted stock granted during the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively.  The restricted stock was issued pursuant to the terms of CTBI’s 2015 Stock Ownership Incentive Plan.  The restrictions on the restricted stock will lapse ratably over four years,. except for a 2,500 management retention restricted stock award granted in January 2020 which will vest at the end of five years, subject to such management employee’s continued employment.  However, in the event of certain participant employee termination events occurring within 24 months of a change in control of CTBI or the death of the participant, the restrictions will lapse, and in the event of the participant’s disability, the restrictions will lapse on a pro rata basis.  The Compensation Committee will have discretion to review and revise restrictions applicable to a participant’s restricted stock in the event of the participant’s retirement.


14
Note 3 – Securities


SecuritiesDebt securities are classified into held-to-maturity and available-for-sale categories.  Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities are those that CTBI has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost.  Available-for-sale (AFS) securities are those that CTBI may decide to sell if needed for liquidity, asset-liability management or other reasons.  Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains or losses included as a separate component of equity, net of tax.  As of June 30,2020, CTBI had 0 held-to-maturity securities.


The amortized cost and fair value of securities at September 30, 2019 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $193,376  $610  $(619) $193,367 
State and political subdivisions  101,593   3,146   (37)  104,702 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  316,745   4,806   (1,088)  320,463 
Other debt securities  31,450   0   (6)  31,444 
Total available-for-sale securities $643,164  $8,562  $(1,750) $649,976 

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
State and political subdivisions $517  $0  $0  $517 
Total held-to-maturity securities $517  $0  $0  $517 


The amortized cost and fair value of securities at December 31, 2018 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $219,358  $48  $(1,468) $217,938 
State and political subdivisions  126,280   633   (2,425)  124,488 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  255,969   397   (5,547)  250,819 
Other debt securities  507   0   (6)  501 
Total available-for-sale securities $602,114  $1,078  $(9,446) $593,746 

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
State and political subdivisions $649  $0  $0  $649 
Total held-to-maturity securities $649  $0  $0  $649 

15


The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at September June 30,2020 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $89,335  $550  $(453) $89,432 
State and political subdivisions  120,194   5,752   (28)  125,918 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  459,327   11,023   (395)  469,955 
Other debt securities  56,536   0   (1,362)  55,174 
Total available-for-sale securities $725,392  $17,325  $(2,238) $740,479 

16


The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at December 31,2019 are summarized as follows:

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $171,250  $476  $(576) $171,150 
State and political subdivisions  99,403   2,941   (37)  102,307 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  291,874   4,443   (1,072)  295,245 
Other debt securities  31,418   0   (276)  31,142 
Total available-for-sale securities $593,945  $7,860  $(1,961) $599,844 

Held-to-Maturity

(in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
State and political subdivisions $517  $0  $0  $517 
Total held-to-maturity securities $517  $0  $0  $517 


The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at June 30,2020 by contractual maturity are shown below.  Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


 Available-for-Sale  Held-to-Maturity  Available-for-Sale 
(in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  Fair Value  
Amortized
Cost
  Fair Value  
Amortized
Cost
  Fair Value 
Due in one year or less $34,370  $34,394  $517  $517  $12,136  $12,195 
Due after one through five years  88,607   89,169   0   0   19,933   20,503 
Due after five through ten years  94,121   94,255   0   0   95,400   96,332 
Due after ten years  77,871   80,251   0   0   82,060   86,320 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  316,745   320,463   0   0   459,327   469,955 
Other debt securities  31,450   31,444   0   0   56,536   55,174 
Total debt securities $643,164  $649,976  $517  $517  $725,392  $740,479 


During the three months ended September June 30, 2019, there was2020, we had a net securities gain of $14937 thousand thousand.  There was a pre-tax loss of $2 thousand realized on calls of AFS securities, consisting of a pre-tax gain of $1565 thousand thousandrealized on sales and a pre-tax losscalls of $3 thousand,AFS securities and an unrealized gain of $16372 thousand thousand from the fair market value adjustment of equity securities. During the three months ended September June 30, 2018, there was a pre-tax loss of $2 thousand realized on calls of AFS securities.



2019,During the nine months ended September 30, 2019, there was we had a net securities gain of $574204 thousand thousand.  There was, consisting of a pre-tax gain of $45 thousand thousand realized on sales and calls of AFS securities and an unrealized gain of $199 thousand from the fair market value adjustment of equity securities.


During the six months ended June 30, 2020, we had a net securities gain of $1.2 million, consisting of a pre-tax gain of $81 thousand$1.1 million realized on sales and a pre-tax losscalls of $77 thousand,AFS securities and an unrealized gain of $570 thousand$0.1 million from the fair market value adjustment of equity securities.  During the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018, there was2019, we had a combined lossnet securities gain of $288$560 thousand, consisting of a pre-tax gain of $6 thousand realized on sales and calls of AFS securities consisting of a pre-taxand an unrealized gain of $284$554 thousand and a pre-tax lossfrom the fair market value adjustment of $572 thousand.equity securities.

Equity Securities at Fair Value


In 2008, Visa distributed 9,918 shares of Visa Class B restricted stock to CTBI which, upon resolution of certain pending legal matters, will become unrestricted and convertible into Visa Class A shares.  Following this distribution, significant concern existed about the ultimate realizable value of these shares, and because CTBI did not have a basis in the stock, the shares were previously not recorded as an asset on CTBI’s balance sheet.  In recent years, the concern over the realizable value has stabilized, and in late 2017 and 2018, several sales of Visa Class B shares have occurred.  While not traded in observable markets, these sales were reported by several financial institutions in various SEC 8-K and 10-K filings.  In 2018, FASB issued a technical correction to its guidance regarding equity securities, ASC 321-10-35-2, allowing an entity to subsequently elect to record an equity security without a readily determinable fair value.  In 2018, CTBI made the election permitted by ASC 321-10-35-2321-10-35-2 to record its Visa Class B shares at fair value.  On December 31, 2018, CTBI recorded a $1.2 million gain on the recognition of the fair value of 9,918 Visa Class B shares held in its portfolio.  Equity securities at fair value as of September June 30, 20192020 were $1.72.1 million million,, as a result of a $0.4 million increase in the fair market value increase in the third second quarter 2020.  The fair market value of equity securities increased $0.2 million in the second quarter 2019.NaN equity securities were sold during the second quarter 2020.

17


The amortized cost of securities pledged as collateral, to secure public deposits and for other purposes, was $237.9218.3 million million at September June 30, 20192020 and $258.8239.1 million million at December 31, 2018.2019.


The amortized cost of securities sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to $259.1308.7 million million at September 30, 2019June 30,2020 and $289.1261.5 million million at December 31, 2018.



16

2019.


CTBI evaluates its investment portfolio on a quarterly basis for impairment.  The analysis performed as of September June 30, 20192020 indicates that all impairment is considered temporary, market and interest rate driven, and not credit-related.  The percentage of total debt securities with unrealized losses as of September 30, 2019June 30,2020 was 38.9%26.8% compared to 75.7%42.8% as of December 31, 2018. 2019.The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of September June 30, 20192020 that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired.  There werehave credit losses.  As stated above, CTBI had no held-to-maturityHTM securities that were deemed to be impaired as of September June 30, 2019.2020.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
Less Than 12 Months                  
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $25,253  $(153) $25,100  $23,440  $(112) $23,328 
State and political subdivisions  8,358   (37)  8,321   536   (28)  508 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  17,634   (70)  17,564   55,124   (307)  54,817 
Other debt securities  12,303   (6)  12,297   56,030   (1,341)  54,689 
Total <12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities  63,548   (266)  63,282 
Total <12 months impaired AFS securities  135,130   (1,788)  133,342 
                        
12 Months or More                        
U.S. Treasury and government agencies  86,397   (466)  85,931   49,653   (341)  49,312 
State and political subdivisions  0   0   0   0   0   0 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  104,959   (1,018)  103,941   15,503   (88)  15,415 
Other debt securities  0   0   0   506   (21)  485 
Total ≥12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities  191,356   (1,484)  189,872 
Total ≥12 months impaired AFS securities  65,662   (450)  65,212 
                        
Total                        
U.S. Treasury and government agencies  111,650   (619)  111,031   73,093   (453)  72,640 
State and political subdivisions  8,358   (37)  8,321   536   (28)  508 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  122,593   (1,088)  121,505   70,627   (395)  70,232 
Other debt securities  12,303   (6)  12,297   56,536   (1,362)  55,174 
Total temporarily impaired AFS securities $254,904  $(1,750) $253,154 
Total impaired AFS securities $200,792  $(2,238) $198,554 

1718


The analysis performed as of December 31, 20182019 indicated that all impairment was considered temporary, market and interest rate driven, and not credit-related.  The following tables provide the amortized cost, gross unrealized losses, and fair market value, aggregated by investment category and length of time the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position as of December 31, 20182019 that are not deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired.  There were no held-to-maturity securities that were deemed to be impaired as of December 31, 2018.2019.

Available-for-Sale

(in thousands) 
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  
Amortized
Cost
  
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
Less Than 12 Months                  
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $78,905  $(271) $78,634  $25,955  $(148) $25,807 
State and political subdivisions  21,707   (194)  21,513   8,356   (37)  8,319 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  61,940   (377)  61,563   19,317   (100)  19,217 
Other debt securities  507   (6)  501   31,418   (276)  31,142 
Total <12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities  163,059   (848)  162,211   85,046   (561)  84,485 
                        
12 Months or More                        
U.S. Treasury and government agencies  97,955   (1,197)  96,758   82,339   (428)  81,911 
State and political subdivisions  51,911   (2,231)  49,680   0   0   0 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  147,658   (5,170)  142,488   91,609   (972)  90,637 
Other debt securities  0   0   0   0   0   0 
Total ≥12 months temporarily impaired AFS securities  297,524   (8,598)  288,926   173,948   (1,400)  172,548 
                        
Total                        
U.S. Treasury and government agencies  176,860   (1,468)  175,392   108,294   (576)  107,718 
State and political subdivisions  73,618   (2,425)  71,193   8,356   (37)  8,319 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  209,598   (5,547)  204,051   110,926   (1,072)  109,854 
Other debt securities  507   (6)  501   31,418   (276)  31,142 
Total temporarily impaired AFS securities $460,583  $(9,446) $451,137  $258,994  $(1,961) $257,033 

U.S. Treasury and Government Agencies


The unrealized losses in U.S. Treasury and government agencies were caused by interest rate increases.  The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than par which will equal amortized cost at maturity.  CTBI does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2019, because CTBI does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost, which may be maturity.cost.

State and Political Subdivisions


The unrealized losses in securities of state and political subdivisions were caused by interest rate increases.  The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than par which will equal amortized cost at maturity.  CTBI does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2019, because CTBI does not intend to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost, which may be maturity.cost.

U.S. Government Sponsored Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities


The unrealized losses in U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities were caused by interest rate increases.  CTBI expects to recover the amortized cost basis over the term of the securities.  CTBI does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2019, because (i) the decline in market value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality, (ii) CTBI does not intend to sell the investments, and (iii) it is not more likely than not we will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost, which may be maturity.cost.

1819

Other Debt Securities


The unrealized losses in other debt securities were caused by interest rate increases.  The contractual terms of those investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than par which will equal amortized cost at maturity.  CTBI does not consider those investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at September 30, 2019, because CTBI does not intend to sell the investments and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost, which may be maturity.cost.

Note 4 – Loans


Major classifications of loans, net of unearned income, deferred loan origination costs and fees, and net premiums on acquired loans, are summarized as follows:

(in thousands) 
September 30
2019
  
December 31
2018
 
Commercial construction $93,534  $82,715 
Commercial secured by real estate  1,174,764   1,183,093 
Equipment lease financing  651   1,740 
Commercial other  388,532   377,198 
Real estate construction  62,859   57,160 
Real estate mortgage  722,632   722,417 
Home equity  110,663   106,299 
Consumer direct  149,500   144,289 
Consumer indirect  511,650   533,727 
Total loans $3,214,785  $3,208,638 
(in thousands)
 
June 30
2020
 
Hotel/motel $257,245 
Commercial real estate residential  257,517 
Commercial real estate nonresidential  772,537 
Dealer floorplans  62,909 
Commercial other  288,850 
Commercial unsecured SBA PPP  266,951 
Commercial loans  1,906,009 
     
Real estate mortgage  780,632 
Home equity lines  108,531 
Residential loans  889,163 
     
Consumer direct  147,284 
Consumer indirect  596,314 
Consumer loans  743,598 
     
Loans and lease financing $3,538,770 

(in thousands)
 
December 31
2019
 
Commercial construction $104,809 
Commercial secured by real estate  1,169,975 
Equipment lease financing  481 
Commercial other  389,683 
Real estate construction  63,350 
Real estate mortgage  733,003 
Home equity  111,894 
Consumer direct  148,051 
Consumer indirect  527,418 
Total loans $3,248,664 


The segments presented for June 30, 2020 reflect the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, while the December totals are presented under the previous incurred loss model. CTB adopted ASC 326 for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance sheet credit exposures. Results of reporting periods beginning January 1, 2020 are presented under ASC 326 while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP.


CTBI has segregated and evaluates its loan portfolio through 9 portfolio segments.segments with similar risk characteristics. CTBI serves customers in small and mid-sized communities in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, southern West Virginia, and northeastern Tennessee.  Therefore, CTBI’s exposure to credit risk is significantly affected by changes in these communities.

20

Commercial
Hotel/motel loans are a significant concentration for CTBI, representing approximately 7.3% of total loans. This industry has unique risk characteristics as it is highly susceptible to changes in the domestic and global economic environments, which can cause the industry to experience substantial volatility. Additionally, any hotel/motel construction loans would be included in this segment as CTBI’s construction loans are for the purpose of erecting or rehabilitating buildings or other structures for commercial purposes, including any infrastructure necessary for development.   Included in this category are improved property, land development, and tract development loans.  The terms of theseprimarily completed as one loan going from construction to permanent financing. These loans are generally short-term with permanent financing upon completion.originated based on the borrower’s ability to service the debt and secondarily based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.


Commercial real estate residential loans includeare commercial purpose construction and permanent financed loans for commercial purpose 1-4 family/multi-family properties. These loans are originated based on the borrower’s ability to service the debt and secondarily based on the fair value of the underlying collateral.


Commercial real estate nonresidential loans are secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties, 1-4 family/multi-family properties, farmland, and other commercial real estate. These loans are originated based on the borrower’s ability to service the debt and secondarilysecondarily based on the fair value of the underlying collateral. Construction for commercial real estate nonresidential loans are also included in this segment as these loans are generally one loan for construction to permanent financing.


Equipment lease financingPrior to the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, all commercial real estate loans are fixed or variable leases for commercial purposes.were segmented together with construction loans presented separately.


Dealer floorplans have historically been reviewed by management as a separate segment of the commercial loan portfolio although for SEC reporting they were combined within the commercial other segment. With the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, CTBI segmented dealer floorplans separately as they are a unique product with unique risk factors. The primary unique factor relevant to dealer floorplans is the ability of the borrower to misappropriate funds provided at the point of sale as their floorplan is collateralized under a blanket security agreement and without specific liens on individual units.  This risk is mitigated by the use of periodic inventory audits.  These audits are performed monthly and follow up is required on any out of compliance items identified.  These audits are subject to increasing frequency when fact patterns suggest more scrutiny is required.


Commercial other loans consist of commercial check loans, agricultural loans, receivable financing, floorplans, loans to financial institutions, loans for purchasing or carrying securities, and other commercial purpose loans. Commercial loans are underwritten based on the borrower’s ability to service debt from the business���sbusiness’s underlying cash flows. As a general practice, we obtain collateral such as real estate, equipment, or other assets, although such loans may be uncollateralized but guaranteed.


Real estate constructionCTBI participated in the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) established by the CARES Act resulting in a new loan segment of unsecured commercial other loans that are typicallyone hundred percent guaranteed by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”).  These loans, which are subject to forgiveness, have maturities of either two or three to five years, depending on when the loan was made.  These loans currently have no allowance for owner-occupied properties.  The terms of these loans are generally short-term with permanent financing upon completion.credit losses.

19

Residential real estate loans are a mixture of fixed rate and adjustable rate first and second lien residential mortgage loans.loans and also include real estate construction loans which are typically for owner-occupied properties. The terms of the real estate construction loans are generally short-term with permanent financing upon completion. As a policy, CTBI holds adjustable rate loans and sells the majority of its fixed rate first lien mortgage loans into the secondarysecondary market. Changes in interest rates or market conditions may impact a borrower’s ability to meet contractual principal and interest payments. Residential real estate loans are secured by real property.


Home equity lines are primarily revolving adjustable rate credit lines secured by real property.

21


Consumer direct loans are a mixture of fixed rate and adjustable rate products comprised of unsecured loans, consumer revolving credit lines, deposit secured loans, and all other consumer purpose loans.


Consumer indirect loans are fixed rate loans secured by automobiles, trucks, vans, and recreational vehicles originated at the selling dealership underwritten and purchased by CTBI’s indirect lending department. Both new and used products are financed. Only dealers who have executed dealer agreements with CTBI participate in the indirect lending program.


Not included in the loan balances above were loans held for sale in the amount of $1.9$29.0 million at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and $2.5$1.2 million at December 31, 2018.2019.


The following tables present the balance in the allowance for credit losses (“ACL”) for the period ended June 30, 2020 and the balance in the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of December 31, 2019 and June 30, 2019:

 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020
 
(in thousands) 
Hotel/
Motel
  
Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
  
Commercial
Real Estate
Nonresidential
  
Dealer
Floorplans
  
Commercial
Other
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  
Home
Equity
  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
ACL                              
Beginning balance $5,922  $4,012  $11,563  $1,713  $6,409  $7,543  $890  $2,163  $9,230  $49,445 
Provision charged to expense  210   (544)  (34)  (102)  204   (112)  (35)  (64)  428   (49)
Losses charged off  0   (35)  (128)  (26)  (1,993)  (119)  0   (261)  (1,247)  (3,809)
Recoveries  0   6   7   0   83   24   1   94   832   1,047 
Ending balance $6,132  $3,439  $11,408  $1,585  $4,703  $7,336  $856  $1,932  $9,243  $46,634 

 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020
 
(in thousands) 
Hotel/
Motel
  
Commercial
Real Estate
Residential
  
Commercial
Real Estate
Nonresidential
  
Dealer
Floorplans
  
Commercial
Other
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  
Home
Equity
  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
ACL                              
Beginning balance, prior to adoption of ASC 326 $3,371  $3,439  $8,515  $802  $5,556  $4,604  $897  $1,711  $6,201  $35,096 
Impact of adoption of ASC 326  170   (721)  119   820   (391)  1,893   (75)  (40)  1,265   3,040 
Provision charged to expense  2,591   794   2,950   (11)  1,637   987   32   673   3,005   12,658 
Losses charged off  0   (86)  (187)  (26)  (2,352)  (179)  0   (630)  (2,764)  (6,224)
Recoveries  0   13   11   0   253   31   2   218   1,536   2,064 
Ending balance $6,132  $3,439  $11,408  $1,585  $4,703  $7,336  $856  $1,932  $9,243  $46,634 

22

 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019
 
(in thousands) 
Commercial
Construction
  
Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate
  
Equipment
Lease
Financing
  
Commercial
Other
  
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  
Home
Equity
  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
ALLL                              
Beginning balance $903  $14,800  $10  $5,217  $396  $4,053  $901  $1,635  $7,089  $35,004 
Provision charged to expense  (36)  533   (3)  238   (38)  299   65   400   105   1,563 
Losses charged off  (71)  (345)  0   (824)  0   (180)  (34)  (331)  (1,012)  (2,797)
Recoveries  3   110   0   258   0   15   1   63   778   1,228 
Ending balance $799  $15,098  $7  $4,889  $358  $4,187  $933  $1,767  $6,960  $34,998 
                                         
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $99  $594  $0  $182  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $875 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $700  $14,504  $7  $4,707  $358  $4,187  $933  $1,767  $6,960  $34,123 
                                         
Loans                                        
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $3,487  $37,028  $0  $11,508  $0  $2,570  $0  $0  $0  $54,593 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $62,284  $1,155,740  $962  $378,540  $57,017  $720,003  $109,831  $145,149  $508,088  $3,137,614 

23

 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019
 
(in thousands) 
Commercial
Construction
  
Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate
  
Equipment
Lease
Financing
  
Commercial
Other
  
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  
Home
Equity
  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
ALLL                              
Beginning balance $862  $14,531  $12  $4,993  $512  $4,433  $841  $1,883  $7,841  $35,908 
Provision charged to expense  2   821   (5)  619   (154)  21   150   281   18   1,753 
Losses charged off  (71)  (380)  0   (1,065)  0   (300)  (60)  (577)  (2,399)  (4,852)
Recoveries  6   126   0   342   0   33   2   180   1,500   2,189 
Ending balance $799  $15,098  $7  $4,889  $358  $4,187  $933  $1,767  $6,960  $34,998 
                                         
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $99  $594  $0  $182  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $875 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $700  $14,504  $7  $4,707  $358  $4,187  $933  $1,767  $6,960  $34,123 
                                         
Loans                                        
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $3,487  $37,028  $0  $11,508  $0  $2,570  $0  $0  $0  $54,593 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $62,284  $1,155,740  $962  $378,540  $57,017  $720,003  $109,831  $145,149  $508,088  $3,137,614 

24

 December 31, 2019 
(in thousands) 
Commercial
Construction
  
Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate
  
Equipment
Lease
Financing
  
Commercial
Other
  
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  
Home
Equity
  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
ALLL                              
Balance, beginning of year $862  $14,531  $12  $4,993   512  $4,433  $841  $1,883  $7,841  $35,908 
Provision charged to expense  497   (137)  (8)  3,032   (40)  414   172   528   361   4,819 
Losses charged off  (72)  (727)  0   (2,179)  (100)  (767)  (139)  (1,100)  (4,652)  (9,736)
Recoveries  12   358   0   509   0   152   23   400   2,651   4,105 
Balance, end of year $1,299  $14,025  $4  $6,355  $372  $4,232  $897  $1,711  $6,201   35,096 
                                         
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $99  $227  $0  $886  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $1,212 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $1,200  $13,798  $4  $5,469  $372  $4,232  $897  $1,711  $6,201  $33,884 
                                         
Loans                                        
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $3,010  $41,379  $0  $11,073  $0  $2,309  $0  $0  $0  $57,771 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $101,799  $1,128,596  $481  $378,610  $63,350  $730,694  $111,894  $148,051  $527,418  $3,190,893 


25

CTBI derived its ACL balance by using vintage modeling for the consumer and residential portfolios.  Static pool models incorporating losses by credit risk rating were developed to determine credit loss balances for the commercial loan segments.


Qualitative loss factors are based on CTBI's judgment of delinquency trends, level of nonperforming loans, trend in loan losses, supervision and administration, quality control exceptions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts based on unemployment rates and industry concentrations.  CTBI has determined that twelve months represents a reasonable and supportable forecast period and reverts back to a historical loss rate immediately.   CTBI leverages economic projections from a reputable and independent third party to form its loss driver forecasts over the twelve month forecast period. Other internal and external indicators of economic forecasts are also considered by CTBI when developing the forecast metrics.


CTBI also has an inherent model risk allocation included in its ACL calculation to allow for certain known model limitations as well as other potential risks not quantified elsewhere.  Management has identified the following known model limitations and made adjustments through this portion of the calculation for them:

(1) The inability to completely identify revolving lines of credit within the commercial other segment.  Management had to make assumptions regarding commercial renewals as those renewals are not tracked well by its loan system.

(2) The inability within the model to estimate the value of modifications made under troubled debt restructurings.  Management has manually calculated the estimated impact based on research of modified terms for troubled debt restructurings.


Also included in inherent model risk at implementation was the estimated allowance for previously impaired loans that had not been changed on CTBI’s loan system.  There were certain loans that met the definition of impaired previously that management did not consider to have significantly different risk characteristics based on the ACL methodology and segmentation, and therefore determined they would no longer require individual analysis.  The inherent model risk factor was decreased by $1.6 million in the first quarter 2020 as formerly impaired loans that are no longer individually analyzed were reassigned and returned to the appropriate loan segments where the historical loss and other qualitative factors were applied.


As of June 30, 2020, CTBI’s ACL declined by $2.8 million or 19 basis points compared to March 31, 2020.  The decline was primarily in the specific reserves allocated to individually evaluated loans.  The decline in ACL as a percentage of loans was also driven by the large growth in PPP loans during the quarter totaling $267.0 million as of June 30, 2020.  These loans were added as a segment and, as they are one hundred percent SBA guaranteed, these loans were provided no allowance for credit losses.

26


Refer to noteNote 1 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information regarding our nonaccrual policy. Nonaccrual loans segregated by class of loans and loans 90 days past due and still accruing segregated by class of loans were as follows:

 (in thousands) 
September 30
2019
  
December 31
2018
 
Commercial:      
Commercial construction $230  $639 
Commercial secured by real estate  4,855   4,537 
Commercial other  585   797 
         
Residential:        
Real estate construction  291   22 
Real estate mortgage  4,464   5,395 
Home equity  661   477 
Consumer:        
Consumer direct  4   0 
Total nonaccrual loans $11,090  $11,867 
 June 30, 2020 
 (in thousands) 
Nonaccrual Loans
with No ACL
  
Nonaccrual Loan
with ACL
  
90+ and Still
Accruing
  
Total
Nonperforming
Loans
 
             
Hotel/motel $0  $0  $132  $132 
Commercial real estate residential  1,809   1,506   5,799   9,114 
Commercial real estate nonresidential  0   2,833   10,276   13,109 
Commercial other  1,259   689   352   2,300 
Total commercial loans  3,068   5,028   16,559   24,655 
                 
Real estate mortgage  0   5,296   4,140   9,436 
Home equity lines  0   691   482   1,173 
Total residential loans  0   5,987   4,622   10,609 
                 
Consumer direct  0   275   97   372 
Consumer indirect  0   0   521   521 
Total consumer loans  0   275   618   893 
                 
Loans and lease financing $3,068  $11,290  $21,799  $36,157 

(in thousands) 
December 31
2019
 
Commercial:   
Commercial construction $230 
Commercial secured by real estate  3,759 
Commercial other  3,839 
     
Residential:    
Real estate construction  634 
Real estate mortgage  4,821 
Home equity  716 
Total nonaccrual loans $13,999 


2027


The following tables present CTBI’s loan portfolio aging analysis, segregated by class, as of SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and December 31, 2018:2019:


 September 30, 2019 
(in thousands) 
30-59 Days
Past Due
  
60-89 Days
Past Due
  
90+ Days
Past Due
  
Total Past
Due
  Current  Total Loans  
90+ and
Accruing*
 
Commercial:                     
Commercial construction $118  $195  $35  $348  $93,186  $93,534  $0 
Commercial secured by real estate  3,639   2,571   15,706   21,916   1,152,848   1,174,764   11,481 
Equipment lease financing  0   0   0   0   651   651   0 
Commercial other  1,126   3,235   3,041   7,402   381,130   388,532   2,674 
Residential:                            
Real estate construction  502   115   283   900   61,959   62,859   4 
Real estate mortgage  1,124   5,501   8,376   15,001   707,631   722,632   5,434 
Home equity  1,053   232   703   1,988   108,675   110,663   264 
Consumer:                            
Consumer direct  732   321   67   1,120   148,380   149,500   67 
Consumer indirect  3,085   654   406   4,145   507,505   511,650   406 
Total $11,379  $12,824  $28,617  $52,820  $3,161,965  $3,214,785  $20,330 
 June 30, 2020 
(in thousands) 
30-59
Days
Past Due
  
60-89
Days
Past Due
  
90+ Days
Past Due
  
Total
Past Due
  Current  
Total
Loans
 
Hotel/motel $0  $0  $132  $132  $257,113  $257,245 
Commercial real estate residential  881   90   7,205   8,176   249,341   257,517 
Commercial real estate nonresidential  2,810   420   12,011   15,241   757,296   772,537 
Dealer floorplans  0   0   0   0   62,909   62,909 
Commercial other  471   417   2,110   2,998   285,852   288,850 
Commercial unsecured SBA PPP  0   0   0   0   266,951   266,951 
Total commercial loans  4,162   927   21,458   26,547   1,879,462   1,906,009 
                         
Real estate mortgage  1,595   3,825   6,071   11,491   769,141   780,632 
Home equity lines  717   431   787   1,935   106,596   108,531 
Total residential loans  2,312   4,256   6,858   13,426   875,737   889,163 
                         
Consumer direct  360   116   372   848   146,436   147,284 
Consumer indirect  1,935   497   521   2,953   593,361   596,314 
Total consumer loans  2,295   613   893   3,801   739,797   743,598 
                         
Loans and lease financing $8,769  $5,796  $29,209  $43,774  $3,494,996  $3,538,770 


 December 31, 2018  December 31, 2019 
(in thousands) 
30-59 Days
Past Due
  
60-89 Days
Past Due
  
90+ Days
Past Due
  
Total Past
Due
  Current  Total Loans  
90+ and
Accruing*
  
30-59
Days
Past Due
  
60-89
Days
Past Due
  
90+ Days
Past Due
  
Total
Past Due
  Current  Total Loans  
90+ and
Accruing*
 
Commercial:                                          
Commercial construction $87  $58  $698  $843  $81,872  $82,715  $58  $118  $0  $467  $585  $104,224  $104,809  $237 
Commercial secured by real estate  6,287   1,204   8,776   16,267   1,166,826   1,183,093   4,632   2,734   5,969   12,366   21,069   1,148,906   1,169,975   8,820 
Equipment lease financing  0   0   0   0   1,740   1,740   0   0   0   0   0   481   481   0 
Commercial other  1,057   94   1,067   2,218   374,980   377,198   581   880   284   6,267   7,431   382,252   389,683   2,586 
Residential:                                                        
Real estate construction  144   438   28   610   56,550   57,160   6   117   52   634   803   62,547   63,350   0 
Real estate mortgage  1,272   5,645   7,607   14,524   707,893   722,417   4,095   774   5,376   10,320   16,470   716,533   733,003   7,088 
Home equity  898   365   441   1,704   104,595   106,299   246   1,084   412   736   2,232   109,662   111,894   344 
Consumer:                                                        
Consumer direct  918   191   74   1,183   143,106   144,289   74   945   230   97   1,272   146,779   148,051   97 
Consumer indirect  4,715   975   507   6,197   527,530   533,727   506   4,037   909   447   5,393   522,025   527,418   448 
Total $15,378  $8,970  $19,198  $43,546  $3,165,092  $3,208,638  $10,198 
Loans and lease financing $10,689  $13,232  $31,334  $55,255  $3,193,409  $3,248,664  $19,620 

*90+ and Accruing are also included in 90+ Days Past Due column.

2128


The risk characteristics of CTBI’s material portfolio segments are as follows:


Hotel/motel loans are a significant concentration for CTBI, representing approximately 7.3% of total loans.  This industry has unique risk characteristics as it is highly susceptible to changes in the domestic and global economic environments, which can cause the industry to experience substantial volatility.  These loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate.  Hotel/motel lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan.  Management monitors and evaluates all commercial real estate loans based on collateral and risk grade criteria.  Commercial construction loans generally are made to customers for the purpose of building income-producing properties, and any hotel/motel construction loan would be included in this segment.  Personal guarantees of the principals are generally required.  Such loans are made on a projected cash flow basis and are secured by the project being constructed.  Construction loan draw procedures are included in each specific loan agreement, including required documentation items and inspection requirements.  Construction loans may convert to term loans at the end of the construction period, or may be repaid by the take-out commitment from another financing source.  If the loan is to convert to a term loan, the repayment ability is based on the borrower’s projected cash flow.  Risk is mitigated during the construction phase by requiring proper documentation and inspections whenever a draw is requested.  Loans in amounts greater than $500,000 generally require a performance bond to be posted by the general contractor to assure completion of the project.


Commercial real estate residential loans are commercial purpose construction and permanent financed loans for commercial purpose 1-4 family/multi-family properties.  All commercial real estate loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate.  Management monitors and evaluates all commercial real estate loans based on collateral and risk grade criteria.  Commercial residential construction loans generally are made to customers for the purpose of building income-producing properties.  Personal guarantees of the principals are generally required.  Such loans are made on a projected cash flow basis and are secured by the project being constructed.  Construction loan draw procedures are included in each specific loan agreement, including required documentation items and inspection requirements.  Construction loans may convert to term loans at the end of the construction period, or may be repaid by the take-out commitment from another financing source.  If the loan is to convert to a term loan, the repayment ability is based on the borrower’s projected cash flow.  Risk is mitigated during the construction phase by requiring proper documentation and inspections whenever a draw is requested.  Loans in amounts greater than $500,000 generally require a performance bond to be posted by the general contractor to assure completion of the project.


Commercial real estate nonresidential loans are secured by nonfarm, nonresidential properties, farmland, and other commercial real estate.  Construction for commercial real estate nonresidential loans are also included in this segment as these loans are generally one loan for construction to permanent financing.  All commercial real estate loans are viewed primarily as cash flow loans and secondarily as loans secured by real estate.  Commercial real estate lending typically involves higher loan principal amounts and the repayment of these loans is generally dependent on the successful operation of the property securing the loan or the business conducted on the property securing the loan.  Commercial real estate loans may be more adversely affected by conditions in the real estate markets or in the general economy.  Management monitors and evaluates all commercial real estate loans based on collateral and risk grade criteria.  Commercial nonresidential construction loans generally are made to customers for the purpose of building income-producing properties.  Personal guarantees of the principals are generally required.  Such loans are made on a projected cash flow basis and are secured by the project being constructed.  Construction loan draw procedures are included in each specific loan agreement, including required documentation items and inspection requirements.  Construction loans may convert to term loans at the end of the construction period, or may be repaid by the take-out commitment from another financing source.  If the loan is to convert to a term loan, the repayment ability is based on the borrower’s projected cash flow.  Risk is mitigated during the construction phase by requiring proper documentation and inspections whenever a draw is requested.  Loans in amounts greater than $500,000 generally require a performance bond to be posted by the general contractor to assure completion of the project.


Equipment lease financing is underwrittenPrior to the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, all commercial real estate loans were segmented together with construction loans presented separately.

29

Dealer floorplans have historically been reviewed by our commercial lenders using the same underwriting standardsmanagement as would be applied to a secured commercial loan requesting 100% financing.  The pricing for equipment lease financing is comparable to that of borrowers with similar quality commercial credits with similar collateral.  Maximum terms of equipment leasing are determined by the type and expected life of the equipment to be leased.  Residual values are determined by appraisals or opinion letters from industry experts.  Leases must be in conformity with our consolidated annual tax plan.  As we underwrite our equipment lease financing in a manner similar to our commercial loan portfolio described below, the risk characteristics for this portfolio mirror thatseparate segment of the commercial loan portfolio.portfolio although for SEC reporting they were combined within the commercial other segment. With the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, CTBI segmented dealer floorplans separately as they are a unique product with unique risk factors.  CTBI maintains strict processing procedures over its floorplan product with any exceptions requested by a loan officer approved by the appropriate loan committee and the floorplan manager.


Commercial other loans are primarily based on the identified cash flows of the borrower and secondarily on the underlying collateral provided by the borrower.  The cash flows of borrowers, however, may not be as expected and the collateral securing these loans may fluctuate in value.  Most commercial loans are secured by the assets being financed or other business assets such as accounts receivable or inventory and may incorporate a personal guarantee; however, some short-term loans may be made on an unsecured basis.  In the case of loans secured by accounts receivable, the availability of funds for the repayment of these loans may be substantially dependent on the ability of the borrower to collect amounts due from its customers.  As we underwrite our equipment lease financing in a manner similar to our commercial loan portfolio described below, the risk characteristics for this portfolio mirror that of the commercial loan portfolio.


CTBI’s participation in the CARES Act PPP loan program has resulted in a new loan segment of unsecured commercial other loans that are one hundred percent SBA guaranteed.  These loans, which are subject to forgiveness, have maturities of either two or three to five years, depending on when the loans was made.  These loans currently have no allowance for credit losses.


With respect to residential loans that are secured by 1-4 family residences and are generally owner occupied, CTBI generally establishes a maximum loan-to-value ratio and requires private mortgage insurance if that ratio is exceeded.  Home equity loans are typically secured by a subordinate interest in 1-4 family residences. Residential construction loans are handled through the home mortgage area of the bank.  The repayment ability of the borrower and the maximum loan-to-value ratio are calculated using the normal mortgage lending criteria.  Draws are processed based on percentage of completion stages including normal inspection procedures.  Such loans generally convert to term loans after the completion of construction.


Consumer loans are secured by consumer assets such as automobiles or recreational vehicles.  Some consumer loans are unsecured such as small installment loans and certain lines of credit.  Our determination of a borrower’s ability to repay these loans is primarily dependent on the personal income and credit rating of the borrowers, which can be impacted by economic conditions in their market areas such as unemployment levels.  Repayment can also be impacted by changes in property values on residential properties.  Risk is mitigated by the fact that the loans are of smaller individual amounts and spread over a large number of borrowers.

22

The indirect lending area of the bank generally deals with purchasing/funding consumer contracts with new and used automobile dealers.  The dealers generate consumer loan applications which are forwarded to the indirect loan processing area for approval or denial.  Loan approvals or denials are based on the creditworthiness and repayment ability of the borrower, and on the collateral value.  The dealers may have limited recourse agreements with CTB.

Credit Quality Indicators:


CTBI categorizes loans into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors.  CTBI also considers the fair value of the underlying collateral and the strength and willingness of the guarantor(s).  CTBI analyzes commercial loans individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk.  Loans classified as loss, doubtful, substandard, or special mention are reviewed quarterly by CTBI for further deterioration or improvement to determine if appropriately classified and valued if deemed impaired.  All other commercial loan reviews are completed every 12 to 18 months.  In addition, during the renewal process of any loan, as well as if a loan becomes past due or if other information becomes available, CTBI will evaluate the loan grade.  CTBI uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

30

➢
Pass grades include investment grade, low risk, moderate risk, and acceptable risk loans.  The loans range from loans that have no chance of resulting in a loss to loans that have a limited chance of resulting in a loss.  Customers in this grade have excellent to fair credit ratings.  The cash flows are adequate to meet required debt repayments.


➢
Watch graded loans are loans that warrant extra management attention but are not currently criticized.  Loans on the watch list may be potential troubled credits or may warrant “watch” status for a reason not directly related to the asset quality of the credit.  The watch grade is a management tool to identify credits which may be candidates for future classification or may temporarily warrant extra management monitoring.


➢
Other assets especially mentioned (OAEM) reflects loans that are currently protected but are potentially weak.  These loans constitute an undue and unwarranted credit risk but not to the point of justifying a classification of substandard.  The credit risk may be relatively minor yet constitute an unwarranted risk in light of circumstances surrounding a specific asset. Loans in this grade display potential weaknesses which may, if unchecked or uncorrected, inadequately protect CTBI’s credit position at some future date.  The loans may be adversely affected by economic or market conditions.


➢
Substandard grading indicates that the loan is inadequately protected by the current sound worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged.  These loans have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the orderly liquidation of the debt with the distinct possibility that CTBI will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.


➢
Doubtful graded loans have the weaknesses inherent in the substandard grading with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.  The probability of loss is extremely high, but because of certain important and reasonably specific pending factors which may work to CTBI’s advantage or strengthen the asset(s), its classification as an estimated loss is deferred until its more exact status may be determined.  Pending factors include proposed merger, acquisition, or liquidation procedures, capital injection, perfecting liens on additional collateral, and refinancing plans.

2331


The following tables present the credit risk profile of CTBI’s commercial loan portfolio based on rating category and payment activity, segregated by class of loans asand based on last credit decision or year of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:origination:

 (in thousands) 
Commercial
Construction
  
Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate
  
Equipment
Leases
  
Commercial
Other
  Total 
September 30, 2019               
Pass $88,034  $1,037,428  $651  $356,980  $1,483,093 
Watch  2,527   55,119   0   13,737   71,383 
OAEM  168   29,516   0   5,637   35,321 
Substandard  2,805   52,616   0   12,030   67,451 
Doubtful  0   85   0   148   233 
Total $93,534  $1,174,764  $651  $388,532  $1,657,481 
                     
December 31, 2018                    
Pass $74,222  $1,038,309  $1,740  $327,431  $1,441,702 
Watch  3,070   71,834   0   28,986   103,890 
OAEM  1,594   19,734   0   5,735   27,063 
Substandard  3,829   53,125   0   14,970   71,924 
Doubtful  0   91   0   76   167 
Total $82,715  $1,183,093  $1,740  $377,198  $1,644,746 
 Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year 
(in thousands)
 2020  2019  2018  2017  2016  Prior  
Revolving
Loans
  Total 
Hotel/motel                        
Risk rating:                        
Pass/watch $15,859  $76,877  $42,255  $52,058  $24,211  $30,357  $29  $241,646 
OAEM  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Substandard  0   0   132   1,113   9,092   5,262   0   15,599 
Doubtful  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Total hotel/motel $15,859  $76,877  $42,387  $53,171  $33,303  $35,619  $29  $257,245 
                                 
Commercial real estate residential                                
Risk rating:                                
Pass/watch $32,631  $47,427  $34,918  $22,779  $29,690  $59,271  $10,720  $237,436 
OAEM  60   1,562   667   957   453   60   450   4,209 
Substandard  2,124   2,210   2,283   4,166   1,198   3,783   108   15,872 
Doubtful  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Total commercial real estate residential $34,815  $51,199  $37,868  $27,902  $31,341  $63,114  $11,278  $257,517 
                                 
Commercial real estate nonresidential                                
Risk rating:                                
Pass/watch $82,320  $118,631  $95,212  $94,677  $111,700  $207,042  $24,821  $734,403 
OAEM  0   511   70   2   0   3,327   20   3,930 
Substandard  3,676   7,132   1,697   2,881   1,513   16,874   401   34,174 
Doubtful  0   0   0   0   0   30   0   30 
Total commercial real estate nonresidential $85,996  $126,274  $96,979  $97,560  $113,213  $227,273  $25,242  $772,537 
                                 
Dealer floorplans                                
Risk rating:                                
Pass/watch $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $62,909  $62,909 
OAEM  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Substandard  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Doubtful  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Total dealer floorplans $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $62,909  $62,909 
                                 
Commercial other                                
Risk rating:                                
Pass/watch $61,504  $39,977  $37,488  $18,186  $8,921  $28,486  $81,263  $275,825 
OAEM  0   0   5,129   250   477   26   0   5,882 
Substandard  2,139   1,819   372   504   1,719   499   91   7,143 
Doubtful  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Total commercial other $63,643  $41,796  $42,989  $18,940  $11,117  $29,011  $81,354  $288,850 
                                 
Commercial unsecured SBA PPP                                
Risk rating:                                
Pass/watch $266,951  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $266,951 
OAEM  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Substandard  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Doubtful  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Total commercial unsecured SBA PPP $266,951  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $266,951 
                                 
Commercial loans                                
Risk rating:                                
Pass/watch $459,265  $282,912  $209,873  $187,700  $174,522  $325,156  $179,742  $1,819,170 
OAEM  60   2,073   5,866   1,209   930   3,413   470   14,021 
Substandard  7,939   11,161   4,484   8,664   13,522   26,418   600   72,788 
Doubtful  0   0   0   0   0   30   0   30 
Total commercial loans $467,264  $296,146  $220,223  $197,573  $188,974  $355,017  $180,812  $1,906,009 

32

(in thousands) 
Commercial
Construction
  
Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate
  
Equipment
Leases
  
Commercial
Other
  Total 
December 31, 2019               
Pass $98,102  $1,036,573  $481  $358,203  $1,493,359 
Watch  3,595   54,338   0   13,618   71,551 
OAEM  254   27,964   0   6,065   34,283 
Substandard  2,858   51,068   0   11,737   65,663 
Doubtful  0   32   0   60   92 
Total $104,809  $1,169,975  $481  $389,683  $1,664,948 


The following tables present the credit risk profile of CTBI’s residential real estate and consumer loan portfolios based on performing or nonperforming status, segregated by class, as of  September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:class:

(in thousands) 
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  Home Equity  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
September 30, 2019                  
Performing $62,564  $712,734  $109,738  $149,429  $511,244  $1,545,709 
Nonperforming (1)  295   9,898   925   71   406   11,595 
Total $62,859  $722,632  $110,663  $149,500  $511,650  $1,557,304 
                         
December 31, 2018                        
Performing $57,132  $712,927  $105,576  $144,215  $533,221  $1,553,071 
Nonperforming (1)  28   9,490   723   74   506   10,821 
Total $57,160  $722,417  $106,299  $144,289  $533,727  $1,563,892 
 Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year 
  2020  2019  2018  2017  2016  Prior  
Revolving
Loans
  Total 
Home equity lines                        
Performing $0  $0  $0  $0  $7  $12,086  $95,265  $107,358 
Nonperforming  0   0   0   0   0   757   416   1,173 
Total home equity lines $0  $0  $0  $0  $7  $12,843  $95,681  $108,531 
                                 
Mortgage loans                                
Performing $85,015  $148,158  $78,460  $78,334  $62,805  $318,424  $0  $771,196 
Nonperforming  0   418   448   400   409   7,761   0   9,436 
Total mortgage loans $85,015  $148,576  $78,908  $78,734  $63,214  $326,185  $0  $780,632 
                                 
Residential loans                                
Performing $85,015  $148,158  $78,460  $78,334  $62,812  $330,510  $95,265  $878,554 
Nonperforming  0   418   448   400   409   8,518   416   10,609 
Total residential loans $85,015  $148,576  $78,908  $78,734  $63,221  $339,028  $95,681  $889,163 
                                 
Consumer direct loans                                
Performing $37,707  $46,038  $26,068  $12,897  $8,888  $15,314  $0  $146,912 
Nonperforming  0   15   3   0   0   354   0   372 
Total consumer direct loans $37,707  $46,053  $26,071  $12,897  $8,888  $15,668  $0  $147,284 
                                 
Consumer indirect loans                                
Performing $181,015  $164,703  $129,347  $69,555  $35,154  $16,019  $0  $595,793 
Nonperforming  0   217   170   74   21   39   0   521 
Total consumer indirect loans $181,015  $164,920  $129,517  $69,629  $35,175  $16,058  $0  $596,314 
                                 
Consumer loans                                
Performing $218,722  $210,741  $155,415  $82,452  $44,042  $31,333  $0  $742,705 
Nonperforming  0   232   173   74   21   393   0   893 
Total consumer loans $218,722  $210,973  $155,588  $82,526  $44,063  $31,726  $0  $743,598 

33

(in thousands) 
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  Home Equity  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
December 31, 2019                  
Performing $62,716  $721,094  $110,834  $147,954  $526,970  $1,569,568 
Nonperforming  634   11,909   1,060   97   448   14,148 
Total $63,350  $733,003  $111,894  $148,051  $527,418  $1,583,716 

(1)  A loan is considered nonperforming if it is 90 days or more past due and/or on nonaccrual.


The total of consumer mortgage loans secured by real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process totaled $3.0$2.4 million at SeptemberJune 30, 2019 compared to $3.3 million at2020 and December 31, 2018.2019.


A loan is considered impaired, inIn accordance with ASC 326-20-30-2, if a loan does not share risk characteristics with other pooled loans in determining the impairment accounting guidance (ASC 310-10-35-16), when basedallowance for credit losses, the loan shall be evaluated for expected credit losses on current informationan individual basis. Of the loans that CTBI has individually evaluated, the loans listed below by segment are those that are collateral dependent:

 June 30, 2020 
(in thousands) 
Number of
Loans
  
Recorded
Investment
  
Specific
Reserve
 
Hotel/motel  3  $14,861  $250 
Commercial real estate residential  3   6,398   0 
Commercial real estate nonresidential  11   22,567   200 
Commercial other  3   7,440   0 
Total collateral dependent loans  20  $51,266  $450 


The hotel/motel, commercial real estate residential, and events, it is probable CTBI will be unable to collectcommercial real estate nonresidential segments are all amounts due fromcollateralized with real estate.  The 3 loans listed in the borrower in accordancecommercial other segment are collateralized by various chattel and real estate collateral with the contractual terms$5.1 million collateralized by a leasehold mortgage and assignment of lease on commercial property as well as furniture, fixtures, and equipment of the loan.  Impaired loans include nonperforming commercial loans but also include loans modified in troubled debt restructurings where concessions have been granted to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.  These concessions could include a reduction inleasehold property and the interest rate on the loan, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions intended to maximize collection.remaining $2.3 million collateralized by underground coal mining equipment and junior real estate liens.

2434

 December 31, 2019 
(in thousands) 
Recorded
Balance
  
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
  
Specific
Allowance
  
Average
Investment
in
Impaired
Loans
  
*Interest
Income
Recognized
 
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:               
Commercial construction $2,836  $2,837  $0  $3,234  $170 
Commercial secured by real estate  40,346   41,557   0   36,976   1,601 
Commercial other  7,829   9,489   0   9,889   460 
Real estate mortgage  2,309   2,309   0   2,385   85 
                     
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:                    
Commercial construction  174   174   99   215   11 
Commercial secured by real estate  1,033   2,176   227   1,678   15 
Commercial other  3,244   3,244   886   1,323   29 
                     
Totals:                    
Commercial construction  3,010   3,011   99   3,449   181 
Commercial secured by real estate  41,379   43,733   227   38,654   1,616 
Commercial other  11,073   12,733   886   11,212   489 
Real estate mortgage  2,309   2,309   0   2,385   85 
Total $57,771  $61,786  $1,212  $55,700  $2,371 

 June 30, 2019 
(in thousands) 
Recorded
Balance
  
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
  
Specific
Allowance
 
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:         
Commercial construction $3,313  $3,383  $0 
Commercial secured by real estate  35,043   36,740   0 
Commercial other  10,992   13,249   0 
Real estate mortgage  2,570   2,570   0 
             
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:            
Commercial construction  174   174   99 
Commercial secured by real estate  1,985   3,473   594 
Commercial other  516   516   182 
             
Totals:            
Commercial construction  3,487   3,557   99 
Commercial secured by real estate  37,028   40,213   594 
Commercial other  11,508   13,765   182 
Real estate mortgage  2,570   2,570   0 
Total $54,593  $60,105  $875 

35

 Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 2019  June 30, 2019 
(in thousands) 
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
  
*Interest
Income
Recognized
  
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
  
*Interest
Income
Recognized
 
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:            
Commercial construction $3,419  $49  $3,537  $95 
Commercial secured by real estate  35,259   403   34,035   750 
Commercial other  11,546   149   10,206   288 
Real estate mortgage  2,572   22   2,451   41 
                 
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:                
Commercial construction  189   3   257   6 
Commercial secured by real estate  2,314   5   2,140   15 
Commercial other  514   6   842   23 
                 
Totals:                
Commercial construction  3,608   52   3,794   101 
Commercial secured by real estate  37,573   408   36,175   765 
Commercial other  12,060   155   11,048   311 
Real estate mortgage  2,572   22   2,451   41 
Total $55,813  $637  $53,468  $1,218 


36

The following table presents impaired loans, the average investment in impaired loans, and interest income recognized on impaired loans for the periods ended September 30, 2019, December 31, 2018, and September 30, 2018:


 September 30, 2019 
(in thousands) 
Recorded
Balance
  
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
  
Specific
Allowance
 
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:         
Commercial construction $2,800  $2,800  $0 
Commercial secured by real estate  38,620   40,134   0 
Commercial other  10,690   12,384   0 
Real estate mortgage  2,318   2,318   0 
             
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:            
Commercial construction  174   174   99 
Commercial secured by real estate  1,366   2,863   398 
Commercial other  347   347   175 
             
Totals:            
Commercial construction  2,974   2,974   99 
Commercial secured by real estate  39,986   42,997   398 
Commercial other  11,037   12,731   175 
Real estate mortgage  2,318   2,318   0 
Total $56,315  $61,020  $672 


 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2019
  
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2019
 
(in thousands) 
Average
Investment
in Impaired
Loans
  
*Interest
Income
Recognized
  
Average
Investment
in Impaired
Loans
  
*Interest
Income
Recognized
 
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:            
Commercial construction $2,959  $37  $3,344  $132 
Commercial secured by real estate  39,217   442   35,762   1,192 
Commercial other  10,863   92   10,425   380 
Real estate mortgage  2,323   23   2,408   64 
                 
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:                
Commercial construction  174   3   229   9 
Commercial secured by real estate  1,397   0   1,892   15 
Commercial other  358   6   680   29 
                 
Totals:                
Commercial construction  3,133   40   3,573   141 
Commercial secured by real estate  40,614   442   37,654   1,207 
Commercial other  11,221   98   11,105   409 
Real estate mortgage  2,323   23   2,408   64 
Total $57,291  $603  $54,740  $1,821 

25


 
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
 
(in thousands) 
Recorded
Balance
  
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
  
Specific
Allowance
  
Average
Investment
in Impaired
Loans
  
*Interest
Income
Recognized
 
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:               
Commercial construction $4,100  $4,100  $0  $3,923  $171 
Commercial secured by real estate  29,645   31,409   0   30,250   1,412 
Commercial other  8,285   9,982   0   8,774   530 
Real estate construction  0   0   0   106   0 
Real estate mortgage  1,882   1,882   0   1,666   41 
                     
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:                    
Commercial construction  127   127   50   42   0 
Commercial secured by real estate  1,854   2,983   605   2,051   1 
Commercial other  473   473   146   285   16 
                     
Totals:                    
Commercial construction  4,227   4,227   50   3,965   171 
Commercial secured by real estate  31,499   34,392   605   32,301   1,413 
Commercial other  8,758   10,455   146   9,059   546 
Real estate construction  0   0   0   106   0 
Real estate mortgage  1,882   1,882   0   1,666   41 
Total $46,366  $50,956  $801  $47,097  $2,171 

26


 September 30, 2018 
(in thousands) 
Recorded
Balance
  
Unpaid
Contractual
Principal
Balance
  
Specific
Allowance
 
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:         
Commercial construction $2,804  $2,804  $0 
Commercial secured by real estate  31,632   33,538   0 
Commercial other  8,268   10,034   0 
Real estate mortgage  1,878   1,880   0 
             
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:            
Commercial secured by real estate  1,980   3,116   641 
Commercial other  321   321   95 
             
Totals:            
Commercial construction  2,804   2,804   0 
Commercial secured by real estate  33,612   36,654   641 
Commercial other  8,589   10,355   95 
Real estate mortgage  1,878   1,880   0 
Total $46,883  $51,693  $736 


 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
  
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
 
(in thousands) 
Average
Investment
in Impaired
Loans
  
*Interest
Income
Recognized
  
Average
Investment
in Impaired
Loans
  
*Interest
Income
Recognized
 
Loans without a specific valuation allowance:            
Commercial construction $2,865  $26  $3,795  $132 
Commercial secured by real estate  30,216   349   30,588   1,073 
Commercial other  8,518   125   8,857   405 
Real estate construction  0   0   106   0 
Real estate mortgage  1,882   13   1,596   24 
                 
Loans with a specific valuation allowance:                
Commercial secured by real estate  2,005   0   2,112   1 
Commercial other  339   8   220   12 
                 
Totals:                
Commercial construction  2,865   26   3,795   132 
Commercial secured by real estate  32,221   349   32,700   1,074 
Commercial other  8,857   133   9,077   417 
Real estate construction  0   0   106   0 
Real estate mortgage  1,882   13   1,596   24 
Total $45,825  $521  $47,274  $1,647 

*Cash basis interest is substantially the same as interest income recognized.

27

Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are certain loans and leases that have been modified in a troubled debt restructuring, where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions.  Modifications of terms for our loans and their inclusion as troubled debt restructurings are based on individual facts and circumstances.  Loan modifications that are included as troubled debt restructurings may involve either an increase or reduction of the interest rate, extension of the term of the loan, or deferral of principal and/or interest payments, regardless of the period of the modification.  All of the loans identified as troubled debt restructuring were modified due to financial stress of the borrower.  In order to determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed to determine the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification.  This evaluation is performed under CTBI’s internal underwriting policy.


When we modify loans and leases in a troubled debt restructuring, we evaluate any possible impairment similar to other impaired loans based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan or lease agreement, or use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If we determined that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance. In periods subsequent to modification, we evaluate all troubled debt restructuring, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognize impairment through the allowance.


During 2019, the second quarter of 2020,certain loans were modified in troubled debt restructurings, where economic concessions were granted to borrowers consisting of reductions in the interest rates, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, and forbearances.  Presented below, segregated by class of loans, are troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the three and ninesix months ended September June 30, 20192020 and 20182019 and the year ended December 31, 2018: 2019:


 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2019
  
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020
 
(in thousands) 
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  
Rate
Modification
  Combination  
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance
 
Commercial:               
Commercial secured by real estate  3  $270  $0  $0  $270 
 Pre-Modification Outstanding Balance 
(in thousands)
 
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  Combination  
Total
Modification
 
Commercial real estate residential  3  $196  $1,809  $2,005 
Commercial real estate nonresidential  3   419   510   929 
Commercial other  2   32   0   0   32   4   115   25   140 
Total commercial loans  10   730   2,344   3,074 
                
Real estate mortgage  1   545   0   545 
Total residential loans  1   545   0   545 
                
Total troubled debt restructurings  5  $302  $0  $0  $302   11  $1,275  $2,344  $3,619 

 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020
 
  Post-Modification Outstanding Balance 
(in thousands)
 
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  Combination  
Total
Modification
 
Commercial real estate residential  3  $196  $1,809  $2,005 
Commercial real estate nonresidential  3   419   510   929 
Commercial other  4   114   25   139 
Total commercial loans  10   729   2,344   3,073 
                 
Real estate mortgage  1   533   0   533 
Total residential loans  1   533   0   533 
                 
Total troubled debt restructurings  11  $1,262  $2,344  $3,606 

 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020
 
  Pre-Modification Outstanding Balance 
(in thousands)
 
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  Combination  
Total
Modification
 
Commercial real estate residential  11  $4,593  $1,809  $6,402 
Commercial real estate nonresidential  12   2,764   510   3,274 
Commercial other  9   579   25   604 
Total commercial loans  32   7,936   2,344   10,280 
                 
Real estate mortgage  2   933   0   933 
Total residential loans  2   933   0   933 
                 
Total troubled debt restructurings  34  $8,869  $2,344  $11,213 

2837


 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2019
  
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020
 
(in thousands) 
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  
Rate
Modification
  Combination  
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance
 
Commercial:               
Commercial secured by real estate  13  $4,784  $0  $679  $5,463 
 Post-Modification Outstanding Balance 
(in thousands)
 
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  Combination  
Total
Modification
 
Commercial real estate residential  11  $4,595  $1,809  $6,404 
Commercial real estate nonresidential  12   2,755   510   3,265 
Commercial other  13   1,292   0   140   1,432   9   513   25   538 
Residential:                    
Total commercial loans  32   7,863   2,344   10,207 
                
Real estate mortgage  2   463   0   243   706   2   921   0   921 
Total residential loans  2   921   0   921 
                
Total troubled debt restructurings  28  $6,539  $0  $1,062  $7,601   34  $8,784  $2,344  $11,128 


 
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
  
Year Ended
December 31, 2019
 
(in thousands) 
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  
Rate
Modification
  Combination  
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance
  
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  
Rate
Modification
  Combination  
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance
 
Commercial:                              
Commercial construction  5  $2,182  $0  $15  $2,197 
Commercial secured by real estate  24   4,004   0   1,383   5,387   17  $6,105  $0  $679  $6,784 
Commercial other  8   465   0   0   465   17   1,565   0   264   1,829 
Residential:                                        
Real estate mortgage  3   264   0   704   968   1   463   0   0   463 
Total troubled debt restructurings  40  $6,915  $0  $2,102  $9,017   35  $8,133  $0  $943  $9,076 


 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
  
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019
 
(in thousands) 
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  
Rate
Modification
  Combination  
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance
  
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  
Rate
Modification
  Combination  
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance
 
Commercial:                              
Commercial secured by real estate  6  $2,028  $0  $400  $2,428   5  $3,686  $0  $37  $3,723 
Commercial other  4   138   0   0   138 
Residential:                                        
Real estate mortgage  1   264   0   0   264   1   0   0   243   243 
Total troubled debt restructurings  7  $2,292  $0  $400  $2,692   10  $3,824  $0  $280  $4,104 

 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019
 
(in thousands) 
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  
Rate
Modification
  Combination  
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance
 
Commercial:               
Commercial secured by real estate  10  $4,514  $0  $679  $5,193 
Commercial other  11   1,260   0   140   1,400 
Residential:                    
Real estate mortgage  2   463   0   243   706 
Total troubled debt restructurings  23  $6,237  $0  $1,062  $7,299 


2938


 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
 
(in thousands) 
Number of
Loans
  
Term
Modification
  
Rate
Modification
  Combination  
Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Balance
 
Commercial:               
Commercial construction  4  $443  $0  $15  $458 
Commercial secured by real estate  23   4,587   0   1,383   5,970 
Commercial other  8   465   0   0   465 
Residential:                    
Real estate mortgage  1   264   0   0   264 
Total troubled debt restructurings  36  $5,759  $0  $1,398  $7,157 


No charge-offs have resulted from modifications for any of the presented periods.  We had $80 thousand in commitments to extend additional credit in the amount of $83 thousand and $82 thousand at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019, on loans that were considered troubled debt restructurings at September 30,2019.restructurings.



Loans retain their accrual status at the time of their modification. As a result, if a loan is on nonaccrual at the time it is modified, it stays as nonaccrual, and if a loan is on accrual at the time of the modification, it generally stays on accrual.  Commercial and consumer loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring are closely monitored for delinquency as an early indicator of possible future default.  If loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring subsequently default, CTBI evaluates the loan for possible further impairment.  The allowance for loan losses may be increased, adjustments may be made in the allocation of the allowance, or partial charge-offs may be taken to further write-down the carrying value of the loan.  Presented below, segregated by class of loans, are loans that were modified as troubled debt restructurings within the past twelve months which have subsequently defaulted.  CTBI considers a loan in default when it is 90 days or more past due or transferred to nonaccrual.  Presented below, segregated by segment, are troubled debt restructurings for which there was a payment default during the periods indicated and such default was within twelve months of the loan modification.

 (in thousands) 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2019
  
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
 
  
Number of
Loans
  
Recorded
Balance
  
Number of
Loans
  
Recorded
Balance
 
Commercial:            
Commercial construction  1  $0   2  $147 
Commercial secured by real estate  1   30   0   0 
Commercial other  1   34   1   6 
Total defaulted restructured loans  2  $64   3  $153 
(in thousands)
 
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020
 
  
Number of
Loans
  
Recorded
Balance
 
Commercial:      
Commercial real estate residential  1  $67 
Commercial other  1   95 
Total defaulted restructured loans  2  $162 

(in thousands)
 
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020
 
  
Number of
Loans
  
Recorded
Balance
 
Commercial:      
Commercial real estate residential  1  $67 
Commercial other  3   368 
Total defaulted restructured loans  4  $435 
 (in thousands) 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2019
  
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
 
  
Number of
Loans
  
Recorded
Balance
  
Number of
Loans
  
Recorded
Balance
 
Commercial:            
Commercial construction  0  $0   2  $147 
Commercial secured by real estate  1   30   1   17 
Commercial other  1   34   2   31 
Total defaulted restructured loans  2  $64   5  $195 



3039
Note 5 – Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses


The following tables present the balance in the allowance for loan and lease losses (“ALLL”) and the recorded investment in loans based on portfolio segment and impairment method as of September 30, 2019, December 31, 2018 and September 30, 2018:


 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2019
 
(in thousands) 
Commercial
Construction
  
Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate
  
Equipment
Lease
Financing
  
Commercial
Other
  
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  
Home
Equity
  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
Allowance for loan losses                              
Beginning balance $799  $15,098  $7  $4,889  $358  $4,187  $933  $1,767  $6,960  $34,998 
Provision charged to expense  299   (742)  (2)  1,436   (28)  705   32   104   (551)  1,253 
Losses charged off  (1)  (21)  0   (638)  0   (384)  (40)  (218)  (1,014)  (2,316)
Recoveries  3   40   0   75   0   10   2   82   664   876 
Ending balance $1,100  $14,375  $5  $5,762  $330  $4,518  $927  $1,735  $6,059  $34,811 
                                         
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $99  $398  $0  $175  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $672 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $1,001  $13,977  $5  $5,587  $330  $4,518  $927  $1,735  $6,059  $34,139 
                                         
Loans                                        
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $2,974  $39,986  $0  $11,037  $0  $2,318  $0  $0  $0  $56,315 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $90,560  $1,134,778  $651  $377,495  $62,859  $720,314  $110,663  $149,500  $511,650  $3,158,470 

31


 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2019
 
(in thousands) 
Commercial
Construction
  
Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate
  
Equipment
Lease
Financing
  
Commercial
Other
  
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  
Home
Equity
  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
Allowance for loan losses                              
Beginning balance $862  $14,531  $12  $4,993  $512  $4,433  $841  $1,883  $7,841  $35,908 
Provision charged to expense  301   79   (7)  2,055   (181)  726   181   385   (533)  3,006 
Losses charged off  (72)  (401)  0   (1,703)  (1)  (684)  (99)  (795)  (3,413)  (7,168)
Recoveries  9   166   0   417   0   43   4   262   2,164   3,065 
Ending balance $1,100  $14,375  $5  $5,762  $330  $4,518  $927  $1,735  $6,059  $34,811 
                                         
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $99  $398  $0  $175  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $672 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $1,001  $13,977  $5  $5,587  $330  $4,518  $927  $1,735  $6,059  $34,139 
                                         
Loans                                        
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $2,974  $39,986  $0  $11,037  $0  $2,318  $0  $0  $0  $56,315 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $90,560  $1,134,778  $651  $377,495  $62,859  $720,314  $110,663  $149,500  $511,650  $3,158,470 

32


 
Year Ended
December 31, 2018
 
(in thousands) 
Commercial
Construction
  
Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate
  
Equipment
Lease
Financing
  
Commercial
Other
  
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  
Home
Equity
  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
Allowance for loan losses                              
Beginning balance $686  $14,509  $18  $5,039  $660  $5,688  $857  $1,863  $6,831  $36,151 
Provision charged to expense  115   786   (6)  824   (115)  (336)  39   572   4,288   6,167 
Losses charged off  0   (988)  0   (1,513)  (33)  (1,004)  (69)  (997)  (6,394)  (10,998)
Recoveries  61   224   0   643   0   85   14   445   3,116   4,588 
Ending balance $862  $14,531  $12  $4,993  $512  $4,433  $841  $1,883  $7,841  $35,908 
                                         
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $50  $605  $0  $146  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $801 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $812  $13,926  $12  $4,847  $512  $4,433  $841  $1,883  $7,841  $35,107 
                                         
Loans                                        
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $4,227  $31,499  $0  $8,758  $0  $1,882  $0  $0  $0  $46,366 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $78,488  $1,151,594  $1,740  $368,440  $57,160  $720,535  $106,299  $144,289  $533,727  $3,162,272 

33


 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
 
(in thousands) 
Commercial
Construction
  
Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate
  
Equipment
Lease
Financing
  
Commercial
Other
  
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  
Home
Equity
  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
Allowance for loan losses                              
Beginning balance $740  $14,658  $17  $4,637  $618  $5,234  $866  $1,910  $7,091  $35,771 
Provision charged to expense  54   298   (2)  82   (44)  (566)  (9)  59   1,671   1,543 
Losses charged off  0   (460)  0   (521)  0   (136)  (19)  (196)  (1,496)  (2,828)
Recoveries  23   142   0   407   0   7   4   133   589   1,305 
Ending balance $817  $14,638  $15  $4,605  $574  $4,539  $842  $1,906  $7,855  $35,791 
                                         
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $0  $641  $0  $95  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $736 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $817  $13,997  $15  $4,510  $574  $4,539  $842  $1,906  $7,855  $35,055 
                                         
Loans                                        
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $2,804  $33,612  $0  $8,589  $0  $1,878  $0  $0  $0  $46,883 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $78,668  $1,150,020  $1,986  $338,056  $61,782  $720,144  $103,805  $146,002  $530,542  $3,131,005 

34


 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
 
(in thousands) 
Commercial
Construction
  
Commercial
Secured by
Real Estate
  
Equipment
Lease
Financing
  
Commercial
Other
  
Real Estate
Construction
  
Real Estate
Mortgage
  
Home
Equity
  
Consumer
Direct
  
Consumer
Indirect
  Total 
Allowance for loan losses                              
Beginning balance $686  $14,509  $18  $5,039  $660  $5,688  $857  $1,863  $6,831  $36,151 
Provision charged to expense  91   895   (3)  98   (58)  (625)  18   402   3,600   4,418 
Losses charged off  0   (937)  0   (1,078)  (28)  (550)  (38)  (687)  (5,013)  (8,331)
Recoveries  40   171   0   546   0   26   5   328   2,437   3,553 
Ending balance $817  $14,638  $15  $4,605  $574  $4,539  $842  $1,906  $7,855  $35,791 
                                         
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $0  $641  $0  $95  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $736 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $817  $13,997  $15  $4,510  $574  $4,539  $842  $1,906  $7,855  $35,055 
                                         
Loans                                        
Ending balance:                                        
Individually evaluated for impairment $2,804  $33,612  $0  $8,589  $0  $1,878  $0  $0  $0  $46,883 
Collectively evaluated for impairment $78,668  $1,150,020  $1,986  $338,056  $61,782  $720,144  $103,805  $146,002  $530,542  $3,131,005 


35
Note 6 – Leases


Effective January 1, 2019, CTBI adopted ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, (Topic 842) and all subsequent ASUs that modified Topic 842.  Based on leases outstanding at December 31, 2018, the impact of adoption was recording a lease liability of approximately $16.1 million, a right-of-use asset of approximately $15.5 million, and a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings of approximately $0.5 million, net of a $0.1 million adjustment to our deferred tax liability.  CTBI has 1 finance lease for property but no material subleases or leasing arrangements for which it is the lessor of property or equipment.


CTBI has operating leases for banking and ATM locations.  These leases have remaining lease terms of 1 year to 45 years, some of which include options to extend the leases for up to 5 years.  We evaluated the original lease terms for each operating lease, some of which include options to extend the leases for up to 5 years, using hindsight.  These options, some of which include variable costs related to rent escalations based on recent financial indices, such as the Consumer Price Index, where CTBI estimates future rent increases, are included in the calculation of the lease liability and right-of-use asset when management determines it is reasonably certain the option will be exercised.  CTBI determines this on each lease by considering all relevant contract-based, asset-based, market-based, and entity-based economic factors. Right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are recognized at lease commencement based on the present value of the remaining lease payments using a discount rate that represents our incremental borrowing rate on a collateralized basis, over a similar term at the lease commencement date.  Right-of-use assets are further adjusted for prepaid rent, lease incentives, and initial direct costs, if any.


The components of lease expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 were as follows:

(in thousands) 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2019
  
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2019
 
Finance lease cost:      
Amortization of right-of-use assets – finance leases $13  $39 
Interest on lease liabilities – finance leases  14   40 
Total finance lease cost  27   79 
         
Short-term lease cost  89   228 
Operating lease cost  442   1,330 
         
Sublease income  63   194 
         
Total lease cost $495  $1,443 


Supplemental cash flow information related to CTBI’s operating and finance leases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 was as follows:

(in thousands) 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2019
  
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2019
 
Finance lease – operating cash flows $14  $40 
Finance lease – financing cash flows  3   11 
Operating lease – operating cash flows (fixed payments)  408   1,255 
New right-of-use assets – operating leases  9   9 
Weighted average lease term – financing leases 26.3 years  26.9 years 
Weighted average lease term – operating leases 14.1 years  14.3 years 
Weighted average discount rate – financing leases  3.70%  3.70%
Weighted average discount rate – operating leases  3.45%  3.00%

36

Maturities of lease liabilities as of September 30, 2019 are as follows:

(in thousands) Operating Leases  Finance Leases 
2019 $409  $17 
2020  1,655   68 
2021  1,671   75 
2022  1,657   75 
2023  1,578   75 
Thereafter  10,914   2,060 
Total lease payments  17,884   2,370 
Less imputed interest  (4,058)  (910)
Total $13,826  $1,460 


At December 31, 2018, minimum non-cancellable rental payments were as follows:

(in thousands) 
Operating Lease
Payments
 
2019 $1,999 
2020  1,710 
2021  1,737 
2022  1,760 
2023  1,696 
Thereafter  13,031 
Total $21,933 

Note 75 – Other Real Estate Owned


Activity for other real estate owned was as follows:


 
Three Months Ended
September 30
  
Nine Months Ended
September 30
  
Three Months Ended
June 30
  
Six Months Ended
June 30
 
(in thousands) 2019  2018  2019  2018  2020  2019  2020  2019 
Beginning balance of other real estate owned $22,536  $30,262  $27,273  $31,996  $19,816  $24,970  $19,480  $27,273 
New assets acquired  647   849   1,889   3,692   237   388   1,862   1,242 
Fair value adjustments  (2,173)  (670)  (3,311)  (1,990)  (306)  (692)  (764)  (1,139)
Sale of assets  (1,177)  (775)  (6,018)  (4,032)  (2,072)  (2,130)  (2,903)  (4,840)
Ending balance of other real estate owned $19,833  $29,666  $19,833  $29,666  $17,675  $22,536  $17,675  $22,536 


Carrying costs and fair value adjustments associated with foreclosed properties for the three months ended JuneSeptember 30, 2020 and 2019 and 2018 were $2.5$0.6 million and $1.1$1.0 million, respectively. Carrying costs and fair value adjustments associated with foreclosed properties for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and 20182019 were $4.31.5 million and $3.31.8 million, respectively. See noteNote 1 for a description of our accounting policies relative to foreclosed properties and other real estate owned.


The major classifications of foreclosed properties are shown in the following table:

(in thousands) 
September 30
2019
  
December 31
2018
  
June 30
2020
  
December 31
2019
 
1-4 family $3,204  $5,253  $2,868  $3,630 
Agricultural/farmland  0   0 
Construction/land development/other  11,323   15,017   10,068   10,211 
Multifamily  88   88   88   88 
Non-farm/non-residential  5,218   6,915   4,651   5,551 
Total foreclosed properties $19,833  $27,273  $17,675  $19,480 


37
Note 86 – Repurchase Agreements


We utilize securities sold under agreements to repurchase to facilitate the needs of our customers and provide additional funding to our balance sheet.  Repurchase agreements are transactions whereby we offer to sell to a counterparty an undivided interest in an eligible security at an agreed upon purchase price, and which obligates CTBI to repurchase the security on an agreed upon date at an agreed upon repurchase price plus interest at an agreed upon rate.  Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are recorded at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction and are reflected in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.


We monitor collateral levels on a continuous basis and maintain records of each transaction specifically describing the applicable security and the counterparty’s fractional interest in that security, and we segregate the security from its general assets in accordance with regulations governing custodial holdings of securities.  The primary risk with our repurchase agreements is market risk associated with the securities securing the transactions, as we may be required to provide additional collateral based on fair value changes of the underlying securities.  Securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements are maintained with our safekeeping agents.  The carrying value of investment securities available-for-sale pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements totaled $262.8$317.1 million and $285.2$264.9 million at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and December 31, 2018,2019, respectively.

40


The remaining contractual maturity of the securities sold under agreements to repurchase by class of collateral pledged included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets as of September June 30, 20192020 and December 31, 20182019 is presented in the following tables:


 September 30, 2019  June 30, 2020 
 Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements  Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements 
(in thousands) 
Overnight and
Continuous
  Up to 30 days  30-90 days  
Greater Than
90 days
  Total  
Overnight and
Continuous
  Up to 30 days  30-90 days  
Greater Than
90 days
  Total 
Repurchase agreements and repurchase-to-maturity transactions:                              
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $15,873  $11,643  $0  $48,936  $76,452  $16,928  $1,723  $12,540  $23,848  $55,039 
State and political subdivisions  51,888   2,691   0   9,951   64,530   56,627   102   1,198   9,340   67,267 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  35,765   16,666   0   35,342   87,773   45,851   9,175   38,262   80,413   173,701 
Total $103,526  $31,000  $0  $94,229  $228,755  $119,406  $11,000  $52,000  $113,601  $296,007 


 December 31, 2018  December 31, 2019 
 Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements  Remaining Contractual Maturity of the Agreements 
(in thousands) 
Overnight and
Continuous
  Up to 30 days  30-90 days  
Greater Than
90 days
  Total  
Overnight and
Continuous
  Up to 30 days  30-90 days  
Greater Than
90 days
  Total 
Repurchase agreements and repurchase-to-maturity transactions:                              
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $25,346  $0  $2,548  $60,699  $88,593  $15,001  $0  $3,479  $58,953  $77,433 
State and political subdivisions  58,864   0   2,995   10,384   72,243   51,193   0   1,768   11,165   64,126 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  22,076   0   1,877   47,923   71,876   35,480   0   1,996   47,882   85,358 
Total $106,286  $0  $7,420  $119,006  $232,712  $101,674  $0  $7,243  $118,000  $226,917 


38
Note 97 – Fair Market Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

Fair Value Measurements


ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements, defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.  ASC 820 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value but does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances.  Fair value measurements must maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs.  In this standard, the FASB clarifies the principle that fair value should be based on the exit price when pricing the asset or liability.  In support of this principle, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the information used to develop those assumptions.  The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

Level 1 Inputs – Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Inputs – Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 Inputs – Unobservable inputs for determining the fair values of assets or liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in determining an exit price for the assets or liabilities.

41

Recurring Measurements


The following tables present the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and December 31, 20182019 and indicate the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.


    
Fair Value Measurements at
September 30, 2019 Using
     
Fair Value Measurements at
June 30, 2020 Using
 
(in thousands) Fair Value  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Fair Value  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Assets measured – recurring basis                        
Available-for-sale securities:                        
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $193,367  $69,938  $123,429  $0  $89,432  $3,498  $85,934  $0 
State and political subdivisions  104,702   0   104,702   0   125,918   0   125,918   0 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  320,463   0   320,463   0   469,955   0   469,955   0 
Other debt securities  31,444   0   31,444   0   55,174   0   55,174   0 
Equity securities at fair value  1,743   0   0   1,743   2,094   0   0   2,094 
Mortgage servicing rights  2,904   0   0   2,904   2,518   0   0   2,518 

39


    
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2018 Using
     
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2019 Using
 
(in thousands) Fair Value  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Fair Value  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Assets measured – recurring basis                        
Available-for-sale securities:                        
U.S. Treasury and government agencies $217,938  $91,028  $126,910  $0  $171,150  $54,263  $116,887  $0 
State and political subdivisions  124,488   0   124,488   0   102,307   0   102,307   0 
U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities  250,819   0   250,819   0   295,245   0   295,245   0 
Other debt securities  501   0   501   0   31,142   0   31,142   0 
Equity securities at fair value  1,173   0   0   1,173   1,953   0   0   1,953 
Mortgage servicing rights  3,607   0   0   3,607   3,263   0   0   3,263 


Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheets, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.  These valuation methodologies were applied to all of CTBI’s financial assets carried at fair value.  CTBI had no liabilities measured and recorded at fair value as of September June 30, 20192020 and December 31, 2018.2019.  There have been no significant changes in the valuation techniques during the quarter or nine months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2019.2020.  For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

42

Available-for-Sale Securities


Securities classified as available-for-sale are reported at fair value on a recurring basis.  U.S. Treasury and government agencies are classified as Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy where quoted market prices are available in the active market on which the individual securities are traded.


If quoted market prices are not available, CTBI obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service, such as Interactive Data, which utilizes pricing models to determine fair value measurement.  CTBI reviews the pricing quarterly to verify the reasonableness of the pricing.  The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayment speeds, credit information and the bond’s terms and conditions, among other factors.  U.S. Treasury and government agencies, state and political subdivisions, U.S. government sponsored agency mortgage-backed securities, and other debt securities are classified as Level 2 inputs.


In certain cases where Level 1 or Level 2 inputs are not available, securities are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.  Fair value determinations for Level 3 measurements are estimated on a quarterly basis where assumptions used are reviewed to ensure the estimated fair value complies with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States.

Equity Securities at Fair Value


As of SeptemberJune 30, 2019 2020 and December 31, 2018,2019, the only securities owned by CTBI that were valued using Level 3 criteria are Visa Class B Stock (included in equity securities at fair value).  In determining fairFair value for Visa Class B Stock CTBI utilizes the expertise ofis determined by an independent third party.  Accordingly, fair value is determined by the independent third party using an income approach by utilizing assumptions about factors such as quarterly common stock dividend payments, the conversion of the securities to the relevant Class A Stock shares subject to the prevailing conversion rate and conversion date.  We have reviewed the assumptions, processes, and conclusions of the third party provider.  We have determined these assumptions, processes, and conclusions to be reasonable and appropriate in determining the fair value of this asset.  See the table below for inputs and valuation techniques used for Level 3 equity securities.

40
Mortgage Servicing Rights


Mortgage servicing rights do not trade in an active, open market with readily observable prices.  CTBI reports mortgage servicing rights at fair value on a recurring basis with subsequent remeasurement of MSRs based on change in fair value.


In determining fair value, CTBI utilizes the expertise of an independent third party.  Accordingly, fair value is determined by the independent third party by utilizing assumptions about factors such as mortgage interest rates, discount rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds, market trends and industry demand.  Due to the nature of the valuation inputs, mortgage servicing rights are classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy.  Fair value determinations for Level 3 measurements of mortgage servicing rights are tested for impairment on a quarterly basis where assumptions used are reviewed to ensure the estimated fair value complies with accounting standards generally accepted in the United States.  We have reviewed the assumptions, processes, and conclusions of the third party provider.  We have determined these assumptions, processes, and conclusions to be reasonable and appropriate in determining the fair value of this asset.  See the table below for inputs and valuation techniques used for Level 3 mortgage servicing rights.

Transfers between Levels

43

There were 0 transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3 as of September 30, 2019.

Level 3 Reconciliation


Following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of recurring fair value measurements, recognized infor the accompanying balance sheetperiods indicated, using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs for the three and nine months ended September30,2019 and 2018:inputs:

(in thousands) 
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2019
  
Three Months Ended
September 30, 2018
  
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2020
  
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019
 
 
Equity
Securities at
Fair Value
  
Mortgage
Servicing
Rights
  
Equity
Securities at
Fair Value
  
Mortgage
Servicing
Rights
  
Equity
Securities at
Fair Value
  
Mortgage
Servicing
Rights
  
Equity
Securities at
Fair Value
  
Mortgage
Servicing
Rights
 
Beginning balance $1,727  $3,119  $0  $3,772  $1,721  $2,481  $1,528  $3,390 
Total unrealized gains (losses) Included in net income  16   (325)  0   45   373   (148)  199   (348)
Issues  0   139   0   118   0   415   0   191 
Settlements  0   (29)  0   (120)  0   (230)  0   (114)
Ending balance $1,743  $2,904  $0  $3,815  $2,094  $2,518  $1,727  $3,119 
                                
Total gains (losses) for the period included in net income attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the reporting date $16  $(325) $0  $45  $373  $(148) $199  $(348)

41

(in thousands) 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2019
  
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2018
  
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2020
  
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019
 
 
Equity
Securities at
Fair Value
  
Mortgage
Servicing
Rights
  
Equity
Securities at
Fair Value
  
Mortgage
Servicing
Rights
  
Equity
Securities at
Fair Value
  
Mortgage
Servicing
Rights
  
Equity
Securities at
Fair Value
  
Mortgage
Servicing
Rights
 
Beginning balance $1,173  $3,607  $0  $3,484  $1,953  $3,263  $1,173  $3,607 
Total unrealized gains (losses) Included in net income  570   (907)  0   341   141   (966)  554   (582)
Issues  0   446   0   329   0   560   0   307 
Settlements  0   (242)  0   (339)  0   (339)  0   (213)
Ending balance $1,743  $2,904  $0  $3,815  $2,094  $2,518  $1,727  $3,119 
                                
Total gains (losses) for the period included in net income attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses related to assets still held at the reporting date $570  $(907) $0  $341  $141  $(966) $554  $(582)


Realized and unrealized gains and losses for items reflected in the table above are included in net income in the consolidated statements of income as follows:

Noninterest Income                  
 
Three Months Ended
September 30
  
Nine Months Ended
September 30
  
Three Months Ended
June 30
  
Six Months Ended
June 30
 
(in thousands) 2019  2018  2019  2018  2020  2019  2020  2019 
Total gains (losses) $(338) $(75) $(579) $2 
Total losses $(6) $(263) $(1,165) $(241)


44
Nonrecurring Measurements


The following tables present the fair value measurements of assets recognized in the accompanying balance sheets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of September June 30, 20192020 and December 31, 20182019 and indicate the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.


    
Fair Value Measurements at
September 30, 2019 Using
     
Fair Value Measurements at
June 30, 2020 Using
 
(in thousands) Fair Value  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Fair Value  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Assets measured – nonrecurring basis                        
Impaired loans (collateral dependent) $1,235  $0  $0  $1,235 
Collateral dependent loans $3,030  $0  $0  $3,030 
Other real estate owned  5,022   0   0   5,022   1,692   0   0   1,692 

42


    
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2018 Using
     
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2019 Using
 
(in thousands) Fair Value  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  Fair Value  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Assets measured – nonrecurring basis                        
Impaired loans (collateral dependent) $747  $0  $0  $747  $3,217  $0  $0  $3,217 
Other real estate owned  6,500   0   0   6,500   12,593   0   0   12,593 


Following is a description of the valuation methodologies and inputs used for assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis and recognized in the accompanying balance sheet, as well as the general classification of such assets pursuant to the valuation hierarchy.  For assets classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the process used to develop the reported fair value is described below.

ImpairedCollateral Dependent Loans (Collateral Dependent)


The estimated fair value of collateral-dependent impaired loans is based on the appraised fair value of the collateral, less estimated cost to sell.  Collateral-dependent impaired loans are classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.


CTBI considers the appraisal or evaluation as the starting point for determining fair value and then considers other factors and events in the environment that may affect the fair value.  Appraisals of the collateral underlying collateral-dependent loans are obtained when the loan is determined to be collateral-dependent and subsequently as deemed necessary by the Chief Credit Officer.  Appraisals are reviewed for accuracy and consistency by the Chief Credit Officer.  Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.  The appraised values are reduced by discounts to consider lack of marketability and estimated cost to sell if repayment or satisfaction of the loan is dependent on the sale of the collateral.  These discounts and estimates are developed by the Chief Credit Officer by comparison to historical results.


Loans considered impaired under ASC 310-35, Impairment of a Loan,collateral dependent are loans for which based on current information and events, itthe repayment is probable thatexpected to be provided substantially through the creditor will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Impaired loans are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect subsequent (i) partial write-downs that are based on the observable market priceoperation or current appraised valuesale of the collateral or (ii)when the full charge-off of the loan carrying value.borrower is experiencing financial difficulty in accordance with ASC 326-20-35-5.  Quarter-to-date fair value adjustments on impairedcollateral dependent loans disclosed above were $(0.1)$0.9 million, $0.4 million, and $0.2 million for the quarterquarters ended SeptemberJune 30, 2020, December 31, 2019, and June 30, 2019, $0.3respectively.  Year-to-date adjustments were $1.4 million, $0.7 million, and $0.5 million for the quarter ended December 31, 2018, and $0.1 million for the quarter ended September 30,2018.  Year-to-date fair value adjustments were $0.3 million for the ninesix months ended September June 30,2019,$0.3 million for 2020, the year ended December 31,2018, 2019, and $0.2 million for the ninesix months ended June 30, 2019, respectively.September 30,2018.

45

Other Real Estate Owned


In accordance with the provisions of ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, other real estate owned (“OREO”) is carried at the lower of fair value at acquisition date or current estimated fair value, less estimated cost to sell when the real estate is acquired.  Estimated fair value of OREO is based on appraisals or evaluations. OREO is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.  Long-lived assets are subject to nonrecurring fair value adjustments to reflect subsequent partial write-downs that are based on the observable market price or current appraised value of the collateral.  Quarter-to-date fair value adjustments on other real estate owned disclosed above were $2.2$0.2 million, $0.4$0.7 million, and $0.8$0.6 million for the quarters ended SeptemberJune 30, 2020, December 31, 2019, and June 30, 2019, December 31, 2018, and September 30, 2018, respectively.  Year-to-date fair value adjustments on other real estate owned disclosed above were $0.7 $2.5 million for the ninesix months ended June 30, 2020, $September3.2 30,2019,$1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, and $31,1.0 2018, and $1.8 million for the ninesix months ended June 30, 2019.September30,2018.

43

Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months but generally not more than 24 months.  Appraisers are selected from the list of approved appraisers maintained by management.

Unobservable (Level 3) Inputs


The following tables present quantitative information about unobservable inputs used in recurring and nonrecurring Level 3 fair value measurements at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and December 31, 2018.2019.

(in thousands)Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
 
Fair Value at
SeptemberJune 30, 20192020
Valuation Technique(s)Unobservable Input
Range
(Weighted
Average)
Equity securities at fair value$1,7432,094Discount cash flows, computer pricing modelDiscount rate
8.0% - 12.0%
(10.0%)
   Conversion date
Dec 2022 – Dec 2026
(Dec 2024)
     
Mortgage servicing rights$2,9042,518Discount cash flows, computer pricing modelConstant prepayment rate
0.0%% - 25.6%28.5%
(14.6%(18.6%)
   Probability of default
0.0% - 100.0%
(2.5%(1.7%)
   Discount rate
10.0% - 11.5%
(10.1%)
     
ImpairedCollateral dependent loans (collateral-dependent)$1,2353,030Market comparable propertiesMarketability discount
(0.1%)8.0% - 99.0%32.0%
(44.0%(21.0%)
     
Other real estate owned$5,0221,692Market comparable propertiesComparability adjustments
9.5%10.0% - 95.0%46.4%
(15.2%(18.4%)

4446

 (in thousands)Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements
 
Fair Value at
December 31, 20182019
Valuation Technique(s)Unobservable Input
Range
(Weighted
Average)
Equity securities at fair value$1,1731,953Discount cash flows, computer pricing modelDiscount rate
8.0% - 12.0%
(10.0%)
   Conversion date
Dec 2022 – Dec 2026
(Dec 2024)
     
Mortgage servicing rights$3,6073,263Discount cash flows, computer pricing modelConstant prepayment rate
7.0%0.0% - 28.1%24.3%
(9.5%(11.7%)
   Probability of default
0.0% - 100.0%
(2.6%(2.7%)
   Discount rate
10.0% - 11.5%
(10.1%)
     
Impaired loans (collateral-dependent)$7473,217Market comparable propertiesMarketability discount
0.0%7.0% - 95.1%99.0%
(41.5%(46.0%)
     
Other real estate owned$6,50012,593Market comparable propertiesComparability adjustments
6.0% - 47.6%29.8%
(14.9%(11.3%)

SensitivityUncertainty of Significant Unobservable InputsFair Value Measurements


The following is a discussion of the sensitivityuncertainty of significant unobservable inputs,fair value measurements, the interrelationships between those inputs and other unobservable inputs used in recurring fair value measurement and of how those inputs might magnify or mitigate the effect of changes in the unobservable inputs on the fair value measurement.

Equity Securities at Fair Value


Fair market value for equity securities is derived based on unobservable inputs, such as the discount rate, quarterly dividend payments payable to the Visa Class B common stock and the prevailing conversion rate at the conversion date.  The most recent conversion rate of 1.6228 and the most recent dividend rate of 0.40570.4868 were used to derive the fair value estimate.  Significant increases (decreases) in either of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.  Generally, a change in the assumption used for discount rate is accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the fair value estimate.

Mortgage Servicing Rights


Fair market value for mortgage servicing rights is derived based on unobservable inputs, such as prepayment speeds of the underlying loans generated using the Andrew Davidson Prepayment Model, FHLMC/FNMA guidelines, the weighted average life of the loan, the discount rate, the weighted average coupon, and the weighted average default rate.  Significant increases (decreases) in either of those inputs in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.  Generally, a change in the assumption used for prepayment speeds is accompanied by a directionally opposite change in the assumption for interest rates.

4547

Fair Value of Financial Instruments


The following table presents estimated fair value of CTBI’s financial instruments as of SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.  In accordance with the prospective adoption of ASU 2016-01, the fair values as of SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 were measured using an exit price notion.


    
Fair Value Measurements
at September 30, 2019 Using
     
Fair Value Measurements
at June 30, 2020 Using
 
(in thousands) 
Carrying
Amount
  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  
Carrying
Amount
  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Financial assets:                        
Cash and cash equivalents $221,821  $221,821  $0  $0  $478,085  $478,085  $0  $0 
Certificates of deposit in other banks  245   0   245   0   245   0   245   0 
Securities available-for-sale  649,976   69,938   580,038   0 
Securities held-to-maturity  517   0   517   0 
Debt securities available-for-sale  740,479   3,498   736,981   0 
Equity securities at fair value  1,743   0   0   1,743   2,094   0   0   2,094 
Loans held for sale  1,943   1,987   0   0   28,987   29,624   0   0 
Loans, net  3,179,974   0   0   3,241,555   3,492,136   0   0   3,604,615 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock  10,794   0   10,794   0   10,408   0   10,408   0 
Federal Reserve Bank stock  4,887   0   4,887   0   4,887   0   4,887   0 
Accrued interest receivable  15,397   0   15,397   0   14,858   0   14,858   0 
Mortgage servicing rights  2,904   0   0   2,904   2,518   0   0   2,518 
                                
Financial liabilities:                                
Deposits $3,389,555  $849,582  $2,558,188  $0  $3,972,309  $1,109,873  $2,895,792  $0 
Repurchase agreements  228,755   0   0   228,833   296,007   0   0   295,923 
Federal funds purchased  5,900   0   5,900   0   1,000   0   1,000   0 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  421   0   451   0   405   0   440   0 
Long-term debt  57,841   0   0   49,382   57,841   0   0   49,382 
Accrued interest payable  6,657   0   6,657   0   4,508   0   4,508   0 
                                
Unrecognized financial instruments:                                
Letters of credit $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
Commitments to extend credit  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Forward sale commitments  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 

4648


The following table presents estimated fair value of CTBI’s financial instruments as of December 31, 20182019 and indicates the level within the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques.


    
Fair Value Measurements
at December 31, 2018 Using
     
Fair Value Measurements
at December 31, 2019 Using
 
(in thousands) 
Carrying
Amount
  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
  
Carrying
Amount
  
Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical Assets
(Level 1)
  
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
  
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
 
Financial assets:                        
Cash and cash equivalents $141,450  $141,450  $0  $0  $264,683  $264,683  $0  $0 
Certificates of deposit in other banks  3,920   0   3,914   0   245   0   245   0 
Securities available-for-sale  593,746   91,028   502,718   0 
Securities held-to-maturity  649   0   649   0 
Debt securities available-for-sale  599,844   54,263   545,581   0 
Debt securities held-to-maturity  517   0   517   0 
Equity securities at fair value  1,173   0   0   1,173   1,953   0   0   1,953 
Loans held for sale  2,461   2,518   0   0   1,167   1,191   0   0 
Loans, net  3,172,730   0   0   3,175,908   3,213,568   0   0   3,283,876 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock  14,713   0   14,713   0   10,474   0   10,474   0 
Federal Reserve Bank stock  4,887   0   4,887   0   4,887   0   4,887   0 
Accrued interest receivable  14,432   0   14,432   0   14,836   0   14,836   0 
Mortgage servicing rights  3,607   0   0   3,607   3,263   0   0   3,263 
                                
Financial liabilities:                                
Deposits $3,305,950  $803,316  $2,513,084  $0  $3,405,572  $865,760  $2,560,271  $0 
Repurchase agreements  232,712   0   0   232,796   226,917   0   0   226,921 
Federal funds purchased  1,180   0   1,180   0   7,906   0   7,906   0 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  436   0   468   0   415   0   446   0 
Long-term debt  59,341   0   0   44,166   57,841   0   0   49,382 
Accrued interest payable  2,902   0   2,902   0   2,839   0   2,839   0 
                                
Unrecognized financial instruments:                                
Letters of credit $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0  $0 
Commitments to extend credit  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 
Forward sale commitments  0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 


Note 8 – Revenue Recognition


CTBI’s primary source of revenue is interest income generated from loans and investment securities.  Interest income is recognized according to the terms of the financial instrument agreement over the life of the loan or investment security unless it is determined that the counterparty is unable to continue making interest payments.  Interest income also includes prepaid interest fees from commercial customers, which approximates the interest foregone on the balance of the loan prepaid.


CTBI's additional source of income, also referred to as noninterest income, includes service charges on deposit accounts, gains on sales of loans, trust and wealth management income, loan related fees, brokerage revenue, and other miscellaneous income and is largely based on contracts with customers.  In these cases, CTBI recognizes revenue when it satisfies a performance obligation by transferring control over a product or service to a customer. CTBI considers a customer to be any party to which we will provide goods or services that are an output of CTBI’s ordinary activities in exchange for consideration.  There is little seasonality with regards to revenue from contracts with customers and all inter-company revenue is eliminated when CTBI’s financial statements are consolidated.


Generally, CTBI enters into contracts with customers that are short-term in nature where the performance obligations are fulfilled and payment is processed at the same time.  Such examples include revenue related to merchant fees, interchange fees, and investment services income.  In addition, revenue generated from existing customer relationships such as deposit accounts are also considered short-term in nature, because the relationship may be terminated at any time and payment is processed at the time performance obligations are fulfilled.  As a result, CTBI does 0t have contract assets, contract liabilities, or related receivable accounts for contracts with customers.   In cases where collectability is a concern, CTBI does not record revenue.

49


Generally, the pricing of transactions between CTBI and each customer is either (i) established within a legally enforceable contract between the two parties, as is the case with loan sales, or (ii) disclosed to the customer at a specific point in time, as is the case when a deposit account is opened or before a new loan is underwritten.  Fees are usually fixed at a specific amount or as a percentage of a transaction amount.  No judgment or estimates by management are required to record revenue related to these transactions and pricing is clearly identified within these contracts.


CTBI primarily operates in Kentucky and contiguous areas. Therefore, all significant operating decisions are based upon analysis of CTBI as 1 operating segment.


We disaggregate our revenue from contracts with customers by contract-type and timing of revenue recognition, as we believe it best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of our revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.  Noninterest income not generated from customers during CTBI’s ordinary activities primarily relates to mortgage servicing rights, gains/losses on the sale of investment securities, gains/losses on the sale of other real estate owned, gains/losses on the sale of property, plant and equipment, and income from bank owned life insurance.


For more information related to our components of noninterest income, see the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income above.

Note 109 – Earnings Per Share


The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:


 
Three Months Ended
September 30
  
Nine Months Ended
September 30
  
Three Months Ended
June 30
  
Six Months Ended
June 30
 
(in thousands except per share data) 2019  2018  2019  2018  2020  2019  2020  2019 
Numerator:                        
Net income $15,269  $16,106  $48,532  $43,519  $19,652  $18,324  $26,231  $33,263 
                                
Denominator:                                
Basic earnings per share:                                
Weighted average shares  17,726   17,691   17,720   17,683   17,739   17,721   17,746   17,717 
Diluted earnings per share:                                
Effect of dilutive stock options and restricted stock grants  17   19   13   17   3   12   7   11 
Adjusted weighted average shares  17,743   17,710   17,733   17,700   17,742   17,733   17,753   17,728 
                                
Earnings per share:                                
Basic earnings per share $0.86  $0.91  $2.74  $2.46  $1.11  $1.03  $1.48  $1.88 
Diluted earnings per share  0.86   0.91   2.74   2.46   1.11   1.03   1.48   1.88 


47

There were 0 options to purchase common shares that were excluded from the diluted calculations above for the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and 2018.2019.  In addition to in-the-money stock options, unvested restricted stock grants were also used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share based on the treasury method.

50
Note 1110 – Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Unrealized gains on AFS securities


Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) and the affected line items in the statements of income during the three and sixnine months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2020 and 2019 and 2018 were:


 Amounts Reclassified from AOCI  Amounts Reclassified from AOCI 
(in thousands) 
Three Months Ended
September 30
  
Nine Months Ended
September 30
  
Three Months Ended
June 30
  
Six Months Ended
June 30
 
 2019  2018  2019  2018  2020  2019  2020  2019 
Affected line item in the statements of income                        
Securities gains (losses) $(2) $(2) $4  $149 
Tax expense (benefit)  (1)  0   1   32 
Securities gains $564  $5  $1,045  $6 
Tax expense  147   1   272   2 
Total reclassifications out of AOCI $(1) $(2) $3  $117  $417  $4  $773  $4 

Note 11 – COVID-19


We continue to work diligently with our customers as we all continue to battle COVID-19.  At June 30, 2020, we had 3,668 COVID-19 loan deferrals totaling $756.6 million, consisting of 850 commercial loan deferrals totaling $639.4 million, 485 residential loan deferrals totaling $63.3 million, and 2,264 consumer loan deferrals totaling $44.6 million, in addition to 69 serviced loan deferrals, pursuant to Freddie Mac guidelines, totaling $9.3 million.  We also had 50 customers who had previously received COVID-19 loan deferrals during the first quarter 2020 that have requested assistance for a second time.  Those deferrals total $68.4 million, consisting of 30 commercial loans deferrals totaling $65.7 million, 18 residential loan deferrals totaling $2.2 million, and 2 serviced loan deferrals, pursuant to Freddie Mac guidelines, totaling $0.5 million.  These loan deferrals and modifications have been executed consistent with the guidelines of the CARES Act.  Pursuant to the CARES Act, these loan deferrals are not included in our nonperforming loans disclosed in Note 4 above.  We have continued participating in the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) stemming from the CARES Act passed by Congress as a stimulus response to the potential economic impacts of COVID-19.  As of June 30, 2020, we had 2,848 PPP loans authorized totaling $275.9 million.  Of these, 2,703 were under $350 thousand, 132 were between $350 thousand and $2.0 million, and 13 were over $2.0 million.  We have closed 2,782 of these loans for a total amount of $274.1 million.


4851
Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations

Overview

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (“MD&A”) is intended to help the reader understand Community Trust Bancorp, Inc., our operations, and our present business environment.  The MD&A is provided as a supplement to – and should be read in conjunction with – our condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes contained in this quarterly report.  The MD&A includes the following sections:

❖Our Business

❖Results of Operations and Financial Condition

❖Dividends

❖Liquidity and Market Risk

❖Interest Rate Risk

❖Capital Resources

❖Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Economic Conditions

❖Stock Repurchase Program

❖Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our Business

Community Trust Bancorp, Inc. (“CTBI”) is a bank holding company headquartered in Pikeville, Kentucky.  Currently, we own one commercial bank, Community Trust Bank, Inc. (“CTB”) and one trust company, Community Trust and Investment Company, Inc. (“CTIC”).  Through our subsidiaries, we have seventy-nine banking locations in eastern, northeastern, central, and south central Kentucky, southern West Virginia, and northeastern Tennessee, four trust offices across Kentucky, and one trust office in northeastern Tennessee.  At SeptemberJune 30, 2019,2020, we had total consolidated assets of $4.3$5.0 billion and total consolidated deposits, including repurchase agreements, of $3.6$4.3 billion.  Total shareholders’ equity at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 was $605.5$631.8 million.  Trust assets under management, which are excluded from CTBI’s total consolidated assets, at SeptemberJune 30, 2019,2020, were $2.2$2.3 billion.  Trust assets under management include CTB’s investment portfolio totaling $0.6$0.7 billion.

Through its subsidiaries, CTBI engages in a wide range of commercial and personal banking and trust and wealth management activities, which include accepting time and demand deposits; making secured and unsecured loans to corporations, individuals and others; providing cash management services to corporate and individual customers; issuing letters of credit; renting safe deposit boxes; and providing funds transfer services.  The lending activities of CTB include making commercial, construction, mortgage, and personal loans.  Lease-financing, lines of credit, revolving lines of credit, term loans, and other specialized loans, including asset-based financing, are also available.  Our corporate subsidiaries act as trustees of personal trusts, as executors of estates, as trustees for employee benefit trusts, as paying agents for bond and stock issues, as investment agent, as depositories for securities, and as providers of full service brokerage and insurance services.  For further information, see Item 1 of our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019.

4952
COVID-19, the CARES Act, and Related Regulatory Actions

Impact of COVID-19

On January 30, 2020, the World Health Organization (“WHO”) announced that the outbreak of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) constituted a public health emergency of international concern.  On March 11, 2020, the WHO declared COVID-19 to be a global pandemic.  The health concerns relating to the COVID-19 outbreak and related governmental actions taken to reduce the spread of the virus have significantly impacted the global economy (including the states and local economies in which we operate), disrupted supply chains, lowered equity market valuations, and created significant volatility and disruption in financial markets.  The outbreak has resulted in authorities implementing numerous measures to try to contain the virus, such as travel bans and restrictions, quarantines, shelter in place or total lock-down orders, and business limitations and shutdowns.  Such measures have significantly contributed to rising unemployment and negatively impacted consumer and business spending.  As a result, the demand for CTBI’s products and services has been, and will continue to be, significantly impacted.

Interest Rates

On March 3, 2020, the Federal Open Market Committee reduced the target federal funds rate by 50 basis points to 1.00% to 1.25%.  This rate was further reduced to a target range of 0% to 0.25% on March 16, 2020.  These reductions in interest rates and other effects of the COVID-19 outbreak are likely to negatively impact CTBI’s net interest income and noninterest income.

The CARES Act and the Paycheck Protection Program

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) was signed into law, providing an approximately $2 trillion stimulus package that includes direct payments to individual taxpayers, economic stimulus to significantly impacted industry sectors, emergency funding for hospitals and providers, small business loans, increased unemployment benefits, and a variety of tax incentives.

For small businesses, eligible nonprofits and certain others, the CARES Act established a Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), which is administered by the Small Business Administration (“SBA”).  On April 24, 2020, the Paycheck Protection Program and Health Care Enhancement Act was enacted.  Among other things, this legislation amends the initial CARES Act program by raising the appropriation level for PPP loans from $349 billion to $670 billion.  The PPP was further modified on June 5, 2020, with the adoption of the Paycheck Protection Program Flexibility Act (the “Flexibility Act”), which extended the maturity date for PPP loans from two years to five years for loans disbursed on or after the date of enactment of the Flexibility Act.  For PPP loans disbursed prior to such enactment, the Flexibility Act permits the borrower and lender to mutually agree to extend the term of the loan to five years. CTB is actively participating in assisting its customers with applications for resources through the program.  PPP loans earn interest at fixed rate of 1%.  CTB anticipates that the majority of these loans will ultimately be forgiven by the SBA in accordance with the terms of the program.  As of June 30, 2020, we had 2,848 PPP loans authorized totaling $275.9 million.  Under the terms of the PPP program, the loans are fully guaranteed by the U.S. government.

53
Paycheck Protection Program Lending Facility

To provide liquidity to small business lenders and the broader credit markets, to help stabilize the financial system, and to provide economic relief to small businesses nationwide, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve Board”) authorized each of the Federal Reserve Banks to participate in the Paycheck Protection Program Lending Facility (the “PPPL Facility”), pursuant to the Federal Reserve Act.  Under the PPPL Facility, each of the Federal Reserve Banks will extend non-recourse loans to eligible financial institutions such as CTB to fund loans guaranteed by the SBA under the PPP.  CTB has until September 30, 2020 to access funds under the PPPL Facility, unless otherwise extended by the Federal Reserve and the Department of the Treasury.

Loan Modifications and Troubled Debt Restructurings

On April 7, 2020, the Federal Reserve Board, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”), and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC” and, together with the Federal Reserve Board and the OCC, the “federal banking regulators”) issued a revised Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions, which, among other things, encouraged financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers who are or may be unable to meet their contractual payment obligations because of the effects of COVID-19, and stated that institutions generally do not need to categorize COVID-19-related modifications as troubled debt restructurings as long as the loans were not 30 days past due at December 31, 2019 and that the agencies will not direct supervised institutions to automatically categorize all COVID-19 related loan modifications as troubled debt restructurings. See “Results of Operations and Financial Condition” of this MD&A for information relating to COVID-19 loan deferrals.

Regulatory Capital

Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) Methodology. On March 27, 2020, federal banking regulators issued an interim final rule that delays the estimated impact on regulatory capital stemming from the implementation of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) for a transition period of up to five years (the “CECL IFR”).  The CECL IFR provides banking organizations that are required (as of January 1, 2020) to adopt CECL for accounting purposes under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles during 2020 an option to delay an estimate of CECL’s impact on regulatory capital.  The capital relief in the CECL IFR is calibrated to approximate the difference in allowances under CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology for the first two years of the transition period.  The cumulative difference at the end of the second year of the transition period is then phased in to regulatory capital over a three-year transition period.  In this way, the CECL IFR gradually phases in the full effect of CECL on regulatory capital, providing a five-year transition period. CTBI adopted CECL effective January 1, 2020 and chose the option to delay the estimated impact on regulatory capital using the relief options described above. See “Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Allowance for Credit Losses” of this MD&A for additional information relating to CECL.

Community Bank Leverage Ratio.  On April 6, 2020, federal banking regulators issued two interim final rules that make changes to the community bank leverage ratio (“CBLR”) framework and implementing certain directives of the CARES Act.  Under the existing CBLR framework, which became effective as of January 1, 2020, community banks and holding companies (which would include CTB and CTBI) that satisfy certain qualifying criteria, including having less than $10 billion in average total consolidated assets and a leverage ratio (referred to as the “community bank leverage ratio”) of greater than 9%, were eligible to opt-in to the CBLR framework.  The community bank leverage ratio is the ratio of a banking organization’s Tier 1 capital to its average total consolidated assets, both as reported on the banking organization’s applicable regulatory filings.  The first of the April 2020 interim final rules provides that, as of the second quarter 2020, banking organizations with leverage ratios of 8% or greater (and that meet the other existing qualifying criteria) may elect to use the CBLR framework. It also establishes a two-quarter grace period for qualifying community banking organizations whose leverage ratios fall below the 8% CBLR requirement, so long as the banking organization maintains a leverage ratio of 7% or greater.  The second interim final rule provides a transition from the temporary 8% CBLR requirement to a 9% CBLR requirement.  It establishes a minimum CBLR of 8% for the second through fourth quarters of 2020, 8.5% for 2021, and 9% thereafter, and maintains a two-quarter grace period for qualifying community banking organizations whose leverage ratios fall no more than 100 basis points below the applicable CBLR requirement.  CTBI elected to use the CBLR framework.  Under either framework, CTBI and CTB would be considered well-capitalized under the applicable guidelines.

54
PPPL Facility.  On April 9, 2020, in order to facilitate use of the PPPL Facility, federal banking regulators issued an interim final rule to modify the Basel III regulatory capital rules applicable to banking organizations to allow those organizations participating in the PPPL Facility to neutralize the regulatory capital effects of participating in the program.  Specifically, the agencies have clarified that banking organizations, including CTBI and CTB, are permitted to assign a zero percent risk weight to covered loans pledged to the PPPL Facility for purposes of determining risk-weighted assets and the leverage ratio.

Results of Operations and Financial Condition

We reported record earnings for the thirdsecond quarter 20192020 of $15.3$19.7 million, or $0.86$1.11 per basic share, compared to $6.6 million, or $0.37 per basic share, earned during the first quarter 2020 and $18.3 million, or $1.03 per basic share, earned during the second quarter 2019 and $16.12019.  The increase in earnings for the quarter was impacted by a $12.8 million positive variance in charges to the provision for credit losses.  Year-to-date earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2020 were $26.2 million, or $0.91 per basic share, earned during the third quarter 2018.  Earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 were $48.5 million, or $2.74$1.48 per basic share, compared to $43.5$33.3 million, or $2.46$1.88 per basic share, earned duringfor the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018.2019.

We continue to work diligently with our customers as we all continue to battle COVID-19.  At June 30, 2020, we had 3,668 COVID-19 loan deferrals totaling $756.6 million, consisting of 850 commercial loan deferrals totaling $639.4 million, 485 residential loan deferrals totaling $63.3 million, and 2,264 consumer loan deferrals totaling $44.6 million, in addition to 69 serviced loan deferrals, pursuant to Freddie Mac guidelines, totaling $9.3 million.  We also had 50 customers who had previously received COVID-19 loan deferrals that have requested assistance for a second time.  Those deferrals total $68.4 million, consisting of 30 commercial loans deferrals totaling $65.7 million, 18 residential loan deferrals totaling $2.2 million, and two serviced loan deferrals, pursuant to Freddie Mac guidelines, totaling $0.5 million.  These loan deferrals and modifications have been executed consistent with the guidelines of the CARES Act.  Pursuant to the CARES Act, these loan deferrals are not included in our nonperforming loans disclosed below.  As discussed above, we have continued to participate in the PPP program created under the CARES Act.  As of June 30, 2020, we had 2,848 PPP loans authorized totaling $275.9 million.  Of these, 2,703 were under $350 thousand, 132 were between $350 thousand and $2.0 million, and 13 were over $2.0 million.  We have closed 2,782 of these loans for a total original note amount of $274.1 million.

Quarterly Highlights

❖Net interest income for the quarter of $36.5$38.5 million was $0.5$2.2 million, or 1.4%6.1%, above prior quarter and $0.4$2.4 million, or 1.1%6.8%, above thirdsecond quarter 2018.2019.

❖Provision for loancredit losses for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 decreased $0.3$12.8 million from prior quarter and $0.3$1.6 million from prior year same quarter.  The $12.7 million provision from prior quarter was a result of the projected economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, as disclosed in our prior quarter filings.

❖Our loan portfolio increased $22.6$251.2 million, an annualized 2.8%30.7%, during the quarter and $6.1$290.1 million, or an annualized 0.3%18.0%, from December 31, 2018.2019.

❖Net loan charge-offs for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 were $1.4$2.8 million, or 0.18%0.32% of average loans annualized, compared to $1.4 million, or 0.17%, experienced for the first quarter 2020 and $1.6 million, or 0.20%, experienced for the second quarter 2019 and $1.5 million, or 0.19%, for the third quarter 2018.2019.

❖Nonperforming loans at $31.4$36.2 million increased $7.4$0.8 million from June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and $9.4$2.5 million from December 31, 2018.  While both the 30-89 days past due and nonaccrual loan categories decreased for the quarter, our loans 90+ days past due increased $9.3 million from prior quarter and $12.3 million from prior year same quarter.2019.  Nonperforming assets at $51.3$53.8 million increased $4.7decreased $1.4 million from June 30, 2019 and $1.9March 31, 2020 but increased $0.7 million from December 31, 2018.2019.

55
❖Deposits, including repurchase agreements, increased $52.1$636.3 million, an annualized 5.6%70.5%, during the quarter and $79.6$635.8 million, or an annualized 3.0%35.2%, from December 31, 2018.2019.

❖
Noninterest income for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 of $12.4$12.9 million was a $0.1$1.4 million, or 11.8%, increase overfrom prior quarter butand a decrease of $0.3$0.6 million, or 2.2%5.1%, increase from prior year same quarter.
quarter.

❖Noninterest expense for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 of $29.9$27.9 million decreased $0.1$0.3 million, or 0.5%1.1%, from prior quarter, but increased $1.8and $2.1 million, or 6.3%7.1%, from prior year same quarter.

❖The variance in income tax expense from prior quarter is a result of the $3.6 million reversal of the valuation allowance on our deferred tax asset for CTBI’s net operating losses, as a result of the enactment of Kentucky HB458, which is discussed in further detail in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section below.

50

Income Statement Review

(dollars in thousands)     Change 2019 vs. 2018        Change 2020 vs. 2019 
Nine Months Ended September 30 2019 2018 Amount Percent 
Six Months Ended June 30 2020  2019  Amount  Percent 
Net interest income
 
$
108,529
 
$
105,875
 
$
2,654
 
2.5
%
 $74,706  $72,010  $2,696   3.7%
Provision for loan losses
 
3,006
 
4,418
 
(1,412
)
 
(32.0
)
Provision for credit losses  12,658   1,753   10,905   622.2%
Noninterest income
 
36,811
 
39,713
 
(2,902
)
 
(7.3
)
  24,400   24,422   (22)  (0.1)
Noninterest expense
 
88,995
 
89,226
 
(231
)
 
(0.3
)
  56,130   59,113   (2,983)  (5.0)
Income taxes
 
 
4,807
 
8,425
 
(3,618
)
 
(42.9
)
  4,087   2,303   1,784   77.5 
Net income
 
$
48,532
 
$
43,519
 
$
5,013
 
11.5
%
 $26,231  $33,263  $(7,032)  (21.1)%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                
Average earning assets
 
$
4,032,753
 
$
3,905,673
 
$
127,080
 
3.3
%
 $4,326,752  $4,018,187  $308,565   7.7%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                
Yield on average earning assets,
tax equivalent*
 
4.65
%
 
4.34
%
 
0.31
%
 
7.1
%
  4.18%  4.67%  (0.49)%  (10.5)%
Cost of interest bearing funds
 
1.46
%
 
0.97
%
 
0.49
%
 
50.3
%
  1.01%  1.46%  (0.45)%  (30.9)%
Net interest margin, tax equivalent*
 
3.62
%
 
3.65
%
 
(0.03
)%
 
(0.8
)%
  3.49%  3.63%  (0.14)%  (4.0)%

*Yield on average earning assets and net interest margin were computed on a tax equivalent basis using a 21% tax rate.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income for the third quarter 2019 of $36.5$38.5 million was an increase of $0.5$2.2 million, or 1.4%6.1%, from first quarter 2020 and an increase of $2.4 million, or 6.8%, from second quarter 2019 and $0.4 million from third quarter 2018.2019.  Our net interest margin at 3.59% increased 23.41% decreased 17 basis points from prior quarter but declined 9and 16 basis points from prior year same quarter, while our average earning assets decreased $7.9increased $465.8 million but increased $143.2and $490.3 million, respectively, during those same periods.  Our yield on average earning assets decreased 243 basis points from prior quarter but increased 17and 65 basis points from prior year same quarter, and our cost of funds decreased 534 basis points from prior quarter but increased 39and 65 basis points from prior year same quarter.  Our ratio of average loans to deposits, including repurchase agreements, was 88.1%84.5% for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 compared to 89.9% for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 and 87.3% for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 and 89.5% for the quarter ended September 30, 2018.  Net2019.  Year-to-date net interest income for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2020 was $74.7 million compared to $72.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2019.  Average earning assets for the six months ended June 30, 2020 increased $308.6 million compared to the first six months of 2019, increased $2.7 million, or 2.5%, from September 30, 2018.while our yield on average earning assets decreased 49 basis points and our cost of interest bearing funds decreased 45 basis points.

56
Provision for LoanCredit Losses

The provision for loancredit losses that was added to the allowance for the thirdsecond quarter 20192020 was $1.3a credit of $49 thousand compared to $12.7 million compared tofor the quarter ended March 31, 2020 and the provision for loan losses of $1.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2019 and $1.52019.  Year-to-date provision for credit losses were $12.7 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2018.  Year-to-date allocationscompared to the reserve were $3.0provision for loan losses of $1.8 million at SeptemberJune 30, 2019 compared2019.  As discussed more fully above, the substantial increase in the allowance during the prior quarter was primarily attributable to $4.4 million at September 30, 2018.  the current COVID-19 pandemic and its expected potential impact on future net charge-offs. This provision represented a charge against current earnings in order to maintain the allowance at an appropriate level determined using the accounting estimates described in the Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates section.  Our reserve coverage (allowance for loan and lease loss reservecredit losses to nonperforming loans) at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 was 110.8%129.0% compared to 146.0%139.8% at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and 170.1%the allowance for loan and lease losses to nonperforming loans of 104.4% at September 30, 2018.December 31, 2019.  Our loancredit loss reserve as a percentage of total loans outstanding was reduced to 1.08% from the 1.10% at June 30, 20192020 decreased to 1.32%, compared to 1.50% at March 31, 2020 and the 1.13% at Septemberloan loss reserve of 1.08% from December 31, 2019.   As of June 30, 2018.2020, CTBI’s allowance for credit losses declined by $2.8 million or 19 basis points compared to March 31, 2020.  The decline was primarily in the specific reserves allocated to individually evaluated loans.  The decline in ACL as a percentage of loans was also driven by the large growth in PPP loans during the quarter totaling $267.0 million as of June 30, 2020.  These loans were added as a segment and, as they are one hundred percent SBA guaranteed, these loans were provided no allowance for credit losses.

Noninterest Income

Noninterest income for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 of $12.4$12.9 million was a $0.1$1.4 million, or 1.1%11.8%, increase overfrom prior quarter butand a decrease of $0.3$0.6 million, or 2.2%5.1%, increase from prior year same quarter.  A $0.3The increase in noninterest income for the quarter was the result of a $1.3 million increase in gains on sales of loans, a $0.7 million increase in loan related fees, and a $0.7 million increase in securities gains, partially offset by a $1.0 million decrease in deposit related fees from prior quarterand a $0.3 million decrease in trust revenue.  The increase in loan related fees is due to fluctuation in the valuation of our mortgage servicing rights.  The decrease in deposit related fees was impacted by a 30-day waiver of overdraft charges as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic which resulted in a $0.7 million loss in revenue in April.  Additionally, overdraft fees have seen a general decline since the COVID – 19 pandemic resulting in an additional decline in overdraft revenue of $0.7 million.  The decrease in overdraft fees was partially offset by a $0.2$0.4 million negativeincrease in Visa Debit fee income.  The positive variance in net securities gains.  The decrease in noninterest income fromto prior year same quarter included a $0.4 million decrease in loan related fees and $0.1 million decrease in trust revenue, partially offset by a $0.2$1.2 million increase in deposit related fees.  Noninterest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 wasgains on sales of loans, a $2.9 million, or 7.3%, decrease from prior year. The decrease in noninterest income from prior year was primarily the result of a $1.5 million decrease in loan related fees, a $0.6 million decrease in trust revenue, and a $2.3 million decrease in other operating revenue, partially offset by a $0.9$0.7 million increase in securities gains, and a $0.4 million increase in gains on sales of loans.  The decrease in loan related fees, is due topartially offset by a decline$1.6 million decrease in deposit service charges and a $0.2 million decrease in trust revenue.  Year-to-date noninterest income was $24.4 million for both the fair market value of our mortgage servicing rights.  Other operating revenue for the ninesix months ended Septemberperiods ending June 30, 2018 included a $1.0 million gain on the sale of a partnership interest resulting from a low income housing tax credit recapture2020 and 201$1.2 million in bank owned life insurance revenue as a result of death9. benefits.

51

Noninterest Expense

Noninterest expense for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 of $29.9$27.9 million decreased $0.1$0.3 million, or 0.5%1.1%, from prior quarter, but increased $1.8and $2.1 million, or 6.3%7.1%, from prior year same quarter.  Noninterest expenseThe decrease from prior quarter was impacted quarter over quarter and year over year byprimarily due to a $1.5$0.3 million increasedecrease in net other real estate owned expense.  This increase was offset byThe decrease in noninterest expense from prior year same quarter included a $1.1$0.9 million decrease in personnel expense, as bonuses and aincentives decreased $0.6 million decrease in FDICand the cost of group medical and life insurance expense quarter over quarter.  Year over year, the increase was also impacted by a $0.3 million increase in data processing expense, offset by a $0.6 million decline in FDIC insurance expense and a $0.2 million decrease in personnel expense.  The decrease in personnel expense was the result of a tier adjustment to our performance-based bonus accrual.  CTBI’s projected performance for 2019 as measured against its performance based incentive, disclosed in its January 30, 2019 SEC Form 8-K, is expected to be above the minimum acceptable performance level required for an incentive payment but below the target.  declined $0.4 million.  Noninterest expense for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2020 was $3.0 million below the six months ended June 30, 2019 was $89.0as personnel expense decreased $1.9 million a $0.2year over year, with decreases of $1.7 million or 0.3%in bonuses and incentives and $0.8 million in the cost of group medical and life insurance, offset partially by an increase of $0.8 million in salaries.  The accruals for incentive payments are lower than prior year based on our current projected earnings for the year.  We also had decreases year over year in several other noninterest expense categories, such as FDIC insurance ($0.1 million), decrease from the first nine months of 2018.marketing and promotional ($0.2 million), advertising ($0.3 million), charitable contributions ($0.1 million), postage and shipping ($0.1 million), and net other real estate owned expense ($0.3 million).

57
Balance Sheet Review

CTBI’s total assets at $4.3$5.0 billion at September 30, 2019 decreased $39.6increased $670.2 million, or 3.6%61.9% annualized, from June 30, 2019 but increased $136.0March 31, 2020 and $656.8 million, or 4.3%30.3% annualized, from December 31, 2018.2019.  Loans outstanding at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 were $3.2$3.5 billion, an increase of $22.6$251.2 million, an annualized 2.8%30.7%, from June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and $6.1$290.1 million, or 0.3%18.0% annualized, from December 31, 2018.2019.  We experienced increases during the quarter of $7.9$229.1 million in the commercial loan portfolio $6.7 million in the residential loan portfolio, $3.6(primarily PPP loans), $41.8 million in the indirect consumer loan portfolio, and $4.4$1.9 million in the direct consumer loan portfolio, offset partially by a $21.6 million decrease in the residential loan portfolio.  The historically low mortgage loan rates have created a significant refinancing boom.  In the quarter ended June 30, 2020, we closed and delivered 647 secondary market mortgage loans for a total of $116.4 million compared to 122 secondary market mortgage loans closed and delivered totaling $16.0 million in the second quarter 2019.  Correspondingly, our total mortgage servicing portfolio increased by $34.5 million during the quarter to $486.3 million.  CTBI’s investment portfolio increased $58.3$107.4 million, or an annualized 38.9%68.0%, from June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and $56.1$140.1 million, or 12.6%46.9% annualized, from December 31, 2018.2019.  Deposits in other banks decreased $115.7increased $289.9 million from prior quarter but increased $74.0and $208.9 million from December 31, 2018.2019.  Deposits, including repurchase agreements, at $3.6$4.3 billion decreased $52.1increased $636.3 million, or an annualized 5.6%70.5%, from June 30, 2019 but increased $79.6March 31, 2020 and $635.8 million, or 3.0%35.2% annualized, from December 31, 2018.2019.The increase in deposits is primarily the result of the receipt of advance Medicare payments from some customers in the healthcare industry, PPP loan proceeds retained on deposit by corporate borrowers, and stimulus payments received and retained by our customers, all a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Shareholders’ equity at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 was $605.5$631.8 million, a 7.2% annualizedan $18.9 million increase from the $594.7$612.9 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020, and a 9.8% annualized$17.0 million increase from the $564.2$614.9 million at December 31, 2018.2019.  Our tangible common equity/tangible assets ratio at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 was 12.64%11.42%.

52

Loans

(in thousands) September 30, 2019  June 30, 2020 
Loan Category Balance 
Variance
from Prior
Year-End
 
YTD
Net Charge-Offs
 Nonperforming ALLL  Balance  
Variance
from Prior
Year-End
  
YTD
Net Charge-
Offs
  Nonperforming  ACL 
Commercial:                          
Construction
 
$
93,534
 
13.1
%
 
$
(63
)
 
$
230
 
$
1,100
 
Secured by real estate
 
1,174,764
 
(0.7
)
 
(235
)
 
16,336
 
14,375
 
Equipment lease financing
 
651
 
(62.6
)
 
0
 
0
 
5
 
Hotel/motel $257,245   14.3% $0  $132  $6,132 
Commercial real estate residential  257,517   (4.4)  (73)  9,114   3,439 
Commercial real estate nonresidential  772,537   (1.0)  (176)  13,109   11,408 
Dealer floorplans  62,909   (25.0)  (26)  0   1,585 
Commercial other
 
388,532
 
3.0
 
(1,286
)
 
3,259
 
5,762
 
  288,850   (5.7)  (2,099)  2,300   4,703 
Commercial unsecured SBA PPP  266,951   100.0   0   0   0 
Total commercial
 
1,657,481
 
0.8
 
(1,584
)
 
19,825
 
21,242
 
  1,906,009   14.5   (2,374)  24,655   27,267 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                    
Residential:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                    
Real estate construction
 
62,859
 
10.0
 
(1
)
 
295
 
330
 
Real estate mortgage
 
722,632
 
0.0
 
(641
)
 
9,898
 
4,518
 
  780,632   (2.0)  (148)  9,436   7,336 
Home equity
 
110,663
 
4.1
 
(95
)
 
925
 
927
 
  108,531   (3.0)  2   1,173   856 
Total residential
 
896,154
 
1.2
 
(737
)
 
11,118
 
5,775
 
  889,163   (2.1)  (146)  10,609   8,192 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                    
Consumer:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                    
Consumer direct
 
149,500
 
3.6
 
(533
)
 
71
 
1,735
 
  147,284   (0.5)  (412)  372   1,932 
Consumer indirect
 
511,650
 
(4.1
)
 
(1,249
)
 
406
 
6,059
 
  596,314   13.1   (1,228)  521   9,243 
Total consumer
 
661,150
 
(2.5
)
 
(1,782
)
 
477
 
7,794
 
  743,598   10.1   (1,640)  893   11,175 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
                    
Total loans
 
$
3,214,785
 
0.2
%
 
$
(4,103
)
 
$
31,420
 
$
34,811
 
 $3,538,770   8.9% $(4,160) $36,157  $46,634 

Asset Quality

CTBI’s total nonperforming loans, not including performing troubled debt restructurings, were $31.4$36.2 million, or 0.98% of total loans, at September 30, 2019 compared to $24.0 million, or 0.75%1.02% of total loans, at June 30, 2019 and $22.12020 compared to $35.4 million, or 0.69%1.08% of total loans, at March 31, 2020 and $33.6 million, or 1.03% of total loans, at December 31, 2018.2019.  Accruing loans 90+ days past due increased $9.3$3.8 million from prior quarter and $10.1$2.2 million from December 31, 2018.2019.  The increase in accruing loans 90+ days past due loans included $7.3includes a $4 million for two loan relationships which have been individually evaluatedis well-secured and are in the process of collection.  We do not anticipate a loss on these credits.  Nonaccrual loans decreased $1.8$3.0 million during the quarter and $0.8but increased $0.4 million from December 31, 2018.2019.  Accruing loans 30-89 days past due at $22.9$13.7 million was a decrease of $7.7decreased $10.4 million from prior quarter but an increase of $0.2and $9.3 million from December 31, 2018.2019.  Our loan portfolio management processes focus on the immediate identification, management, and resolution of problem loans to maximize recovery and minimize loss.  Our loan portfolio risk management processes include weekly delinquent loan review meetings at the market levels and monthly delinquent loan review meetings involving senior corporate management to review all nonaccrual loans and loans 30 days or more past due.  Any activity regarding a criticized/classified loan (i.e. problem loan) must be approved by CTB’s Watch List Asset Committee (i.e. Problem Loan Committee).  CTB’s Watch List Asset Committee also meets on a quarterly basis and reviews every criticized/classified loan of $100,000 or greater.  We also have a Loan Review Department that reviews every market within CTB annually and performs extensive testing of the loan portfolio to assure the accuracy of loan grades and classifications for delinquency, troubled debt restructuring, impaired status, impairment, nonaccrual status, and adequate loan loss reserves.

Impaired loans, loans not expected to meet contractual principal and interest payments other than insignificant delays, at September 30, 2019 totaled $56.3 million, compared to $54.6 million at June 30, 2018 and $46.4 million at December 31, 2018.Management evaluates all impaired loans for the amount of impairment, if any, and records a direct charge-off or provides specific reserves when necessary.
58

For further information regarding nonperforming and impaired loans, see noteNote 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

53

CTBI generally does not offer high risk loans such as option ARM products, high loan to value ratio mortgages, interest-only loans, loans with initial teaser rates, or loans with negative amortizations, and therefore, CTBI would have no significant exposure to these products.

Our level of foreclosed properties at $19.8$17.7 million at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 was a $2.7$2.1 million decrease from the $22.5$19.8 million at June 30, 2019March 31, 2020 and a $7.5$1.8 million decrease from the $27.3$19.5 million at December 31, 2018.2019.  Sales of foreclosed properties for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 totaled $6.0$2.9 million while new foreclosed properties totaled $1.9 million.  The suspension of residential foreclosure actions as a result of COVID-19 has continued through the second quarter 2020.  At SeptemberJune 30, 2019,2020, the book value of properties under contracts to sell was $2.2$2.0 million; however, the closings had not occurred at quarter-end.

When foreclosed properties are acquired, appraisals are obtained and the properties are booked at the current market value less expected sales costs.  Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties.  When an updated appraisal reflects a fair market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new market value less expected sales costs.  Charges to earnings in the thirdsecond quarter 20192020 to reflect the decrease in current market values of foreclosed properties totaled $2.2$0.3 million.  There were 30 propertieswas one property reappraised during the thirdsecond quarter 2019.  Of these, 20 properties were2020, which was written down by a total of $2.1 million.$16 thousand.  Charges to earnings were $0.7 million during the quarters ended March 31, 2020 and June 30, 2019 were $0.5 million and September 30, 2018.  The increase in write-downs for the quarter included a $1.7$0.7 million, write-down related to one commercial property.respectively.  Charges to earnings for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 were $3.3$0.8 million compared to $2.0$1.1 million for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018.2019.  Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months but generally not more than 24 months.  Approximately ninetyninety-two percent of our OREO properties have appraisals dated within the past 18 months.  Management anticipates that our foreclosed properties will remain elevated as we work through current market conditions.

59
The appraisal aging analysis of foreclosed properties, as well as the holding period, at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 is shown below:

(in thousands)(in thousands)  (in thousands)   
Appraisal Aging AnalysisAppraisal Aging Analysis Holding Period AnalysisAppraisal Aging Analysis Holding Period Analysis 
Days Since Last
Appraisal
Number of
Properties
Current Book
Value
 Holding Period
Current Book
Value
 
Number of
Properties
  
Current Book
Value
 Holding Period 
Current Book
Value
 
Up to 3 months34$4,593 Less than one year$2,945  3  $109  Less than one year $2,113 
3 to 6 months81,199 1 year1,031  25   1,939  1 year  1,178 
6 to 9 months161,934 2 years817  15   7,770  2 years  1,169 
9 to 12 months6243 3 years3,516  26   4,609  3 years  246 
12 to 18 months303,324 4 years842  17   2,147  4 years  2,858 
18 to 24 months71,086 5 years1,197  4   190  5 years  653 
Over 24 months37,454 6 years*56  3   911  6 years*  640 
Total104$19,833 7 years*938  93  $17,675  7 years*  0 
   8 years*8,491         8 years*  7,855 
   9 years*0         9 years*  963 
   Total$19,833         Total $17,675 

*Regulatory approval is required and has been obtained to hold these properties beyond the initial period of 5 years.  Additional approval may be required to continue to hold these properties should they not be liquidated during the extension period, which is typically one year.  To the extent we are not able to sell a foreclosed property in 10 years, we will be required to relinquish ownership of that property.

As disclosed above, CTBI is required to dispose of any foreclosed property that has not been sold within 10 years.  As of December 31, 2018,June 30, 2020, two foreclosed propertyproperties with a total book value of $2.4$1.0 million had been held by us for at least nine years.  DuringOne of the first nine months of 2019, we disposed of all of these properties.  At September 30, 2019, we heldproperties totaling $0.9 million is expected to sell in the third quarter 2020 at no foreclosed property for nine years or more.

54
expected loss.

Net loan charge-offs for the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 were $1.4$2.8 million, or 0.18%0.32% of average loans annualized, compared to $1.4 million, or 0.17%, experienced for the first quarter 2020 and $1.6 million, or 0.20%, experienced for the second quarter 2019 and $1.5 million, or 0.19%,2019.  Of the net charge-offs for the third quarter, 2018.$2.1 million were in commercial loans, $0.4 million were in indirect consumer loans, $0.2 million were in direct consumer loans, and $0.1 million were in residential loans.  Net loan charge-offs for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 were $4.1$4.2 million, or 0.25% of average loans, compared to $2.7 million, or 0.17% of average loans, compared to $4.8 million, or 0.20% of average loans, experienced for the ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 2018.2019.  Of the net charge-offs for the nine months, $1.6 millionsix month, $2.4 were in commercial loans, $1.3$1.2 million were in indirect consumer loans, $0.7 million were in residential loans, and $0.5$0.4 million were in direct consumer loans, and $0.2 million were in residential loans.

Dividends

The following schedule shows the quarterly cash dividends paid for the past six quarters:

Pay DateRecord Date Amount Per Share 
October 1, 2019September 15, 2019 $0.38 
July 1, 2019June 15, 2019 $0.36 
April 1, 2019March 15, 2019 $0.36 
January 1, 2019December 15, 2018 $0.36 
October 1, 2018September 15, 2018 $0.36 
July 1, 2018June 15, 2018 $0.33 
Pay DateRecord DateAmount Per Share
July 1, 2020June 15, 2020$0.38
April 1, 2020March 15, 2020$0.38
January 1, 2020December 15, 2019$0.38
October 1, 2019September 15, 2019$0.38
July 1, 2019June 15, 2019$0.36
April 1, 2019March 15, 2019$0.36

60
Liquidity and Market Risk

The objective of CTBI’s Asset/Liability management function is to maintain consistent growth in net interest income within our policy limits.  This objective is accomplished through management of our consolidated balance sheet composition, liquidity, and interest rate risk exposures arising from changing economic conditions, interest rates, and customer preferences.  The goal of liquidity management is to provide adequate funds to meet changes in loan and lease demand or deposit withdrawals.  This is accomplished by maintaining liquid assets in the form of cash and cash equivalents and investment securities, sufficient unused borrowing capacity, and growth in core deposits and wholesale funding (including the use of wholesale brokered deposits).  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2019,2020, we had approximately $221.8$478.1 million in cash and cash equivalents and approximately $650.0$740.5 million in securities valued at estimated fair value designated as available-for-sale and available to meet liquidity needs on a continuing basis compared to $141.5$264.7 million and $593.7$599.8 million at December 31, 2018.2019.  Additional asset-driven liquidity is provided by the remainder of the securities portfolio and the repayment of loans.  In addition to core deposit funding, we also have a variety of other short-term and long-term funding sources available.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2019,2020, we had wholesale brokered deposits outstanding of $37.1 million with a weighted average maturity of 0.960.21 years compared to $42.3$37.1 million with a weighted average maturity of 1.580.71 years at December 31, 2018.2019.  We also rely on Federal Home Loan Bank advances for both liquidity and management of our asset/liability position.  Federal Home Loan Bank advances were $0.4 million at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and December 31, 2018.2019.  As of SeptemberJune 30, 2019,2020, we had a $438.1$371.4 million available borrowing position with the Federal Home Loan Bank compared to $312.2$391.9 million at December 31, 2018.2019.  We generally rely upon net inflows of cash from financing activities, supplemented by net inflows of cash from operating activities, to provide cash for our investing activities.  As is typical of many financial institutions, significant financing activities include deposit gathering, use of short-term borrowing facilities such as repurchase agreements and federal funds purchased, use of wholesale brokered deposits, and issuance of long-term debt.  At SeptemberJune 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018,2020 we had $45$75 million in lines of credit with various correspondent banks available to meet any future cash needs.needs compared to $45 million at December 31, 2019.  Our primary investing activities include purchases of securities and loan originations.  We do not rely on any one source of liquidity and manage availability in response to changing consolidated balance sheet needs.  Included in our cash and cash equivalents at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 were deposits with the Federal Reserve of $151.5$412.2 million compared to $73.5$203.6 million at December 31, 2018.  At December 31, 2018, cash and cash equivalents included federal funds sold of $1.1 million; however, we had no federal funds sold as of September 30, 2019.  Additionally, we project cash flows from our investment portfolio to generate additional liquidity over the next 90 days.

55

The investment portfolio consists of investment grade short-term issues suitable for bank investments.  The majority of the investment portfolio is in U.S. government and government sponsored agency issuances.  At SeptemberJune 30, 2019,2020, available-for-sale (“AFS”) securities comprised substantially all of the total investment portfolio, and the AFS portfolio was approximately 107%117% of equity capital.  Eighty-sixEighty-three percent of the pledge eligible portfolio was pledged.

Interest Rate Risk

We consider interest rate risk one of our most significant market risks. Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates.  Consistency of our net interest revenue is largely dependent upon the effective management of interest rate risk.  We employ a variety of measurement techniques to identify and manage our interest rate risk including the use of an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to changing interest rates.  The model is based on actual cash flows and repricing characteristics for on and off-balance sheet instruments and incorporates market-based assumptions regarding the effect of changing interest rates on the prepayment rates of certain assets and liabilities.  Assumptions based on the historical behavior of deposit rates and balances in relation to changes in interest rates are also incorporated into the model.  These assumptions are inherently uncertain, and as a result, the model cannot precisely measure net interest income or precisely predict the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on net interest income.  Actual results will differ from simulated results due to timing, magnitude, and frequency of interest rate changes as well as changes in market conditions and management strategies.

CTBI’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (ALCO), which includes executive and senior management representatives and reports to the Board of Directors, monitors and manages interest rate risk within Board-approved policy limits.  Our current exposure to interest rate risks is determined by measuring the anticipated change in net interest income spread evenly over the twelve-month period.

61
Capital Resources

Shareholders’ equity at June 30, 2020 was $605.5$631.8 million, at September 30, 2019 and $564.2a $17.0 million increase from the $614.9 million at December 31, 2018.2019.  Cash dividends were $0.76 per share and $0.72 per share for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  CTBI’s annualized dividend yield to shareholders as of SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 was 3.57%4.64%.  Our primary source of capital growth is the retention of earnings.  Cash dividends were $1.10 per share and $1.02 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.  We retained 59.9%48.6% of our earnings for the first ninesix months of 20192020 compared to 58.5%61.7% for the first ninesix months of 2018.2019.

On July 2, 2013, the Federal Reserve approved final rules that substantially amended the regulatory risk-based capital rules applicable to CTBI and CTB.  The FDIC subsequently approved these rules.  The final rules implemented the “Basel III” regulatory capital reforms and changes required by the Dodd-Frank Act.

The rules included new risk-based capital and leverage ratios, which were phased in from 2015 to January 2019, and refined the definition of what constitutes “capital” for purposes of calculating those ratios.  The minimum capital level requirements applicable to CTBI and CTB under the final rules are: (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 6%; (iii) a total capital ratio of 8%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 4% for all institutions.  The final rules also established a “capital conservation buffer” above the new regulatory minimum capital requirements, which must consist entirely of common equity Tier 1 capital.  The capital conservation buffer began to be phased in on January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of risk-weighted assets increased by 0.625% annually until fully implemented in January 2019.  An institution is subject to limitations on certain activities including payment of dividends, share repurchases, and discretionary bonuses to executive officers if its capital level is below the total capital plus capital conservation buffer amount.

The final rules also contain revisions to the prompt corrective action framework, which is designed to place restrictions on insured depository institutions, including CTB, if their capital levels begin to show signs of weakness.  These revisions took effect January 1, 2015.  Under the prompt corrective action requirements, which are designed to complement the capital conservation buffer, insuredInsured depository institutions are required to meet the following capital level requirements in order to qualify as “well capitalized:“well-capitalized:” (i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 6.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of 8%; (iii) a total capital ratio of 10%; and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5%.  We currently satisfy the well-capitalized and the capital conservation standards required by the Federal Reserve, and based on our current capital composition and levels, we anticipate that our capital ratios, on a Basel III basis, will continue to exceed the well-capitalized minimum capital requirements and capital conservation buffer standards.

56
On October 29, 2019, federal banking regulators adopted a final rule to simplify the regulatory capital requirements for eligible community banks and holding companies that opt-in to the community bank leverage ratio framework (the “CBLR framework”), as required by Section 201 of the Economic Growth, Relief and Consumer Protection Act of 2018.  Under the final rule, which became effective as of January 1, 2020, community banks and holding companies (which would include CTB and CTBI) that satisfy certain qualifying criteria, including having less than $10 billion in average total consolidated assets and a leverage ratio (referred to as the “community bank leverage ratio”) of greater than 9%, were eligible to opt-in to the CBLR framework.  The community bank leverage ratio is the ratio of a banking organization’s Tier 1 capital to its average total consolidated assets, both as reported on the banking organization’s applicable regulatory filings.  As discussed in “COVID-19, the CARES Act and Related Regulatory Actions – Regulatory Capital” of this MD&A, the CBLR framework was modified in response to COVID-19.  However, CTBI intends to continue with the existing layered ratio structure.  Under either framework, CTBI and CTB would be considered well-capitalized under the applicable guidelines.

On March 27, 2020, pursuant to the CARES Act, federal banking regulators issued an interim final rule that delays the estimated impact on regulatory capital stemming from the implementation of CECL for a transition period of up to five years (the “CECL IFR”).  The CECL IFR provides banking organizations that are required (as of January 1, 2020) to adopt CECL for accounting purposes under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles during 2020 an option to delay an estimate of CECL’s impact on regulatory capital.  The capital relief in the CECL IFR is calibrated to approximate the difference in allowances under CECL relative to the incurred loss methodology for the first two years of the transition period.  The cumulative difference at the end of the second year of the transition period is then phased in to regulatory capital over a three-year transition period.  In this way, the CECL IFR gradually phases in the full effect of CECL on regulatory capital, providing a five-year transition period.  CTBI adopted CECL effective January 1, 2020 and chose the option to delay the estimated impact on regulatory capital using the relief options described above.

On April 9, 2020, in order to facilitate use of the PPPL Facility, federal banking regulators issued an interim final rule to modify the Basel III regulatory capital rules applicable to banking organizations to allow those organizations participating in the PPPL Facility to neutralize the regulatory capital effects of including CTBI and CTB, are permitted to assign a zero percent risk weight to covered loans pledged to the PPPL Facility for purposes of determining risk-weighted assets and the leverage ratio.

As of SeptemberJune 30, 2019,2020, CTBI had a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 17.03%17.21%, a Tier 1 capital ratio of 18.82%18.93%, a total capital ratio of 19.93%20.18%, and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 13.84%12.92%.  Our capital conservation buffer at SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 was 11.93%12.18%.

In December 2017, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision unveiled the latest round of its regulatory framework, commonly referred to as Basel IV.  The framework makes changes to the capital framework of Basel III and is targeted for a timeframe of 2022-2027 for implementation.  The new framework appears designed to limit the flexibility of financial institutions using advanced approaches to calculate credit and other risks and also makes significant amendments to the standardized approaches to credit risk, credit valuation adjustment risk, and operational risk.  The manner and the form in which the Basel IV framework will be implemented in the U.S. are uncertain.

62
As of SeptemberJune 30, 2019,2020, we are not aware of any current recommendations by banking regulatory authorities which, if they were to be implemented, would have, or are reasonably likely to have, a material adverse impact on our liquidity, capital resources, or operations.

Impact of Inflation, Changing Prices, and Economic Conditions

The majority of our assets and liabilities are monetary in nature. Therefore, CTBI differs greatly from most commercial and industrial companies that have significant investment in nonmonetary assets, such as fixed assets and inventories.  However, inflation does have an important impact on the growth of assets in the banking industry and on the resulting need to increase equity capital at higher than normal rates in order to maintain an appropriate equity to assets ratio.  Inflation also affects other expenses, which tend to rise during periods of general inflation.

We believe one of the most significant impacts on financial and operating results is our ability to react to changes in interest rates.  We seek to maintain an essentially balanced position between interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities in order to protect against the effects of wide interest rate fluctuations.

BeginningWe are all finding ourselves living and operating in 2008,unprecedented times as the U.S. economy facedCOVID-19 pandemic is causing personal and financial hardship to our customers, employees, and communities.  During these challenging times, we have instituted programs to support our customers with loan modifications, forbearance, and fee waivers and participated in programs created by the government stimulus programs like the Paycheck Protection Program, focused on helping small businesses keep their employees and meet their expenses as they are unable to operate due to mandated closures.  We instituted programs supporting our employees focused on healthcare, childcare, and remote and split schedule work, as well as work space changes that allow for proper social distancing to keep our employees safe as we continue to operate as a severe economic crisis including a major recession from which recovery was slowcritical part of the economy.  We continue to support our communities through donations to non-profit organizations as they strive to continue their commitments of serving those in need.  We also continue to manage our company for the long term and uneven.  Commerceour strong capital position and business growth in certain regionsculture of building communities built on trust will facilitate our ability to manage through these challenging times.  Our results for the first six months were good, but the extraordinary changes in the U.S. remains reducedeconomic conditions and local governments and many businesses continue to experience financial difficulty.  In some areasthe implications of the U.S., including certain partsimpact of COVID-19 to the future for our service area, unemployment levels remain elevated.  There can be no assurance that these conditionscustomers had a material impact on our first quarter provision for credit losses.  We will continue to improve and these conditions could worsen.  In addition,serve our constituents while we all meet the levelchallenges of U.S. debt, the Federal Open Market Committee’s monetary policy, potential volatility in oil prices, U.S. tax law modifications, political events, and trade policies may have a destabilizing effect on financial markets or a negative effect on the economy.

Our financial performance generally, and in particular the ability of borrowers to pay interest on and repay principal of outstanding loans and the value of collateral securing those loans, as well as demand for loans and other products and services we offer, is highly dependent upon the business environment in the markets where we operate, in the states of Kentucky, West Virginia, and Tennessee and in the United States as a whole.  While unemployment rates have improved in all of the markets in which we operate, unemployment rates in our markets remain high compared to the national average.  A favorable business environment is generally characterized by, among other factors, economic growth, efficient capital markets, low inflation, low unemployment, high business and investor confidence, and strong business earnings.  Unfavorable or uncertain economic and market conditions can be caused by declines in economic growth, business activity, or investor or business confidence; limitations on the availability or increases in the cost of credit and capital; increases in inflation or interest rates; high unemployment; natural disasters; or a combination of these or other factors.

57

While economic conditions in the United States and worldwide have improved since the recession, there can be no assurance that this improvement will continue or that another recession will not occur.  Economic pressure on consumers and uncertainty regarding continuing economic improvement may result in changes in consumer and business spending, borrowing, and savings habits.  Such conditions could adversely affect the credit quality of our loans and our business, financial condition, and results of operations.living with COVID-19.

Stock Repurchase Program

CTBI has not acquired any shares of common stock through theCTBI’s stock repurchase program since February 2008.  There are 67,371began in December 1998 with the authorization to acquire up to 500,000 shares and was increased by an additional 1,000,000 shares in July 2000, May 2003, and March 2020.  CTBI repurchased 32,664 shares of its common stock during the first quarter 2020, leaving 1,034,706 shares remaining under CTBI’sour current repurchase authorization.  As of June 30, 2020, a total of 2,465,294 shares have been repurchased through this program.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the appropriate application of certain accounting policies, many of which require us to make estimates and assumptions about future events and their impact on amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and related notes.  Since future events and their impact cannot be determined with certainty, the actual results will inevitably differ from our estimates.  Such differences could be material to the consolidated financial statements.

63
We believe the application of accounting policies and the estimates required therein are reasonable.  These accounting policies and estimates are constantly reevaluated, and adjustments are made when facts and circumstances dictate a change.  Historically, we have found our application of accounting policies to be appropriate, and actual results have not differed materially from those determined using necessary estimates.

We have identified the following critical accounting policies:

Investments – Management determines the classification of securities at purchase.  We classify debt securities into held-to-maturity, trading, or available-for-sale categories.  Held-to-maturity securities are those which we have the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity and are reported at amortized cost.  In accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 320, Investments – Debt Securities, investments in debt securities that are not classified as held-to-maturity shall be classified in one of the following categories and measured at fair value in the statement of financial position:

a. Trading securities.securities. Securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling them in the near term (thus held for only a short period of time) shall be classified as trading securities. Trading generally reflects active and frequent buying and selling, and trading securities are generally used with the objective of generating profits on short-term differences in price.
b. Available-for-sale securities. Investments not classified as trading securities (nor as held-to-maturity securities) shall be classified as available-for-sale securities.

We do not have any securities that are classified as trading securities.  Available-for-sale securities are reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included as a separate component of shareholders’ equity, net of tax.  If declines in fair value are other than temporary, the carrying value of the securities is written down to fair value as a realized loss with a charge to income for the portion attributable to credit losses and a charge to other comprehensive income for the portion that is not credit related.

Gains or losses on disposition of debt securities are computed by specific identification for those securities.  Interest and dividend income, adjusted by amortization of purchase premium or discount, is included in earnings.

58
With the implementation of ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (commonly referred to as “CECL”), an allowance will be recognized for credit losses relative to available-for-sale securities rather than as a reduction in the cost basis of the security.  Subsequent improvements in credit quality or reductions in estimated credit losses will be recognized immediately as a reversal of the previously recorded allowance, which aligns the income statement recognition of credit losses with the reporting period in which changes occur.

WhenHeld-to-maturity securities will be subject to CECL.  CECL will require an allowance on these held-to-maturity debt securities for lifetime expected credit losses, determined by adjusting historical loss information for current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts.  The forward-looking evaluation of lifetime expected losses will be performed on a pooled basis for bonds that share similar risk characteristics.  These allowances for expected losses must be made by the fair valueholder of athe HTM debt security when the security is below its amortized cost, and depending on the length of time the condition exists and the extent the fair market value is below amortized cost, additional analysis is performed to determine whether an other than temporary impairment condition exists.  Available-for-sale and held-to-maturitypurchased.  At June 30, 2020, CTBI held no securities are analyzed quarterly for possible other than temporary impairment.  The analysis considers (i) whether we have the intent to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity and (ii) whether it is more likely than not that we will not have to sell our securities prior to recovery and/or maturity.  Often, the information available to conduct these assessments is limited and rapidly changing, making estimates of fair value subject to judgment.  If actual information or conditions are different than estimated, the extent of the impairment of the security may be different than previously estimated, which could have a material effect on CTBI’s results of operations and financial condition.designated as held-to-maturity.

Subsequent to the January 1, 2018 effective date of ASU 2016-01, ASC 320 applies only to debtCTBI accounts for equity securities andin accordance with ASC 321, Investments – Equity Securities, applies to equity securities..  ASC 321 requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method and those that result in the consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair values recognized in net income.

Equity securities with a readily determinable fair value are required to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value recognized through net income.  Equity securities without a readily determinable fair value are carried at cost, less any impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes for identical or similar investments.  An election can be made, asAs permitted by ASC 321-10-35-2, CTBI can make an irrevocable election to subsequently measure an equity security without a readily determinable fair value, and all identical or similar investments of the same issuer, including future purchases of identical or similar investments of the same issuer, at fair value.  Equity securities held by CTBI include securities without readily determinable fair values.  CTBI has elected to accountmade this election for these securities at fair value.its Visa Class B equity securities.  The fair value of these securities was determined by a third party service provider using Level 3 inputs as defined in ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement, and changes in fair value are recognized in income.

64
Loans – Loans with the ability and the intent to be held until maturity and/or payoff are reported at the carrying value of unpaid principal reduced by unearned interest, an allowance for loan and lease losses, and unamortized deferred fees or costs.  Income is recorded on the level yield basis.  Interest accrual is discontinued when management believes, after considering economic and business conditions, collateral value, and collection efforts, that the borrower’s financial condition is such that collection of interest is doubtful.  Any loan greater than 90 days past due must be well secured and in the process of collection to continue accruing interest.  Cash payments received on nonaccrual loans generally are applied against principal, and interest income is only recorded once principal recovery is reasonably assured.  Loans are not reclassified as accruing until principal and interest payments remain current for a period of time, generally six months, and future payments appear reasonably certain.  Included in certain loan categories of impaired loans are troubled debt restructurings that were classified as impaired.  A restructuring of a debt constitutes a troubled debt restructuring if the creditor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the debtor that it would not otherwise consider.

The provisions of the CARES Act included an election to not apply the guidance on accounting for troubled debt restructurings to loan modifications, such as extensions or deferrals, related to COVID-19 made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of (i) December 31, 2020 or (ii) 60 days after the end of the COVID-19 national emergency.  The relief can only be applied to modifications for borrowers that were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019.  CTBI elected to adopt these provisions of the CARES Act.

Loan origination and commitment fees and certain direct loan origination costs are deferred and the net amount amortized over the estimated life of the related loans, leases, or commitments as a yield adjustment.

Allowance for Loan and LeaseCredit Losses – FASB issued ASU 2016-13 in 2016 which introduced the current expected credit losses methodology (CECL) for estimating allowances for credit losses.  This accounting change was effective January 1, 2020.  CTBI measures expected credit losses of financial assets on a collective (pool) basis using loss-rate methods when the financial assets share similar risk characteristics.  Loans that do not share risk characteristics are evaluated on an individual basis.  Regardless of an initial measurement method, once it is determined that foreclosure is probable, the allowance for credit losses is measured based on the fair value of the collateral as of the measurement date.  As a practical expedient, the fair value of the collateral may be used for a loan when determining the allowance for credit losses for which the repayment is expected to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty.  The fair value shall be adjusted for selling costs.  For collateral-dependent financial assets, the credit loss expected may be zero if the fair value less costs to sell exceed the amortized cost of the loan.  Loans shall not be included in both collective assessments and individual assessments.

In the event that collection of principal becomes uncertain, CTBI has policies in place to reverse accrued interest in a timely manner.  Therefore, CTBI elected ASU 2019-04 which allows that accrued interest would continue to be presented separately and not part of amortized cost on loan.  The methodology used by CTBI is developed using the current loan balance, which is then compared to amortized cost balances to analyze the impact.  The difference in amortized cost basis versus consideration of loan balances impacts the allowance for credit losses calculation by one basis point and is considered immaterial.  The primary difference is for indirect lending premiums.

We maintain an allowance for loan and leasecredit losses (“ALLL”ACL”) at a level that is appropriate to cover estimated credit losses on individually evaluated loans, determined to be impaired, as well as estimated credit losses inherent in the remainder of the loan and lease portfolio.  Credit losses are charged and recoveries are credited to the ALLL.ACL.

65
We utilize an internal risk grading system for commercial credits.  Those larger commercial credits that exhibit probable or observed credit weaknessesmeet the following criteria are subject to individual review.evaluation:  the loan has an outstanding bank share balance of $1 million or greater and (i) has a criticized risk rating, (ii) is in nonaccrual status, (iii) is a TDR, or (iv) is 90 days or more past due.  The borrower’s cash flow, adequacy of collateral coverage, and other options available to CTBI, including legal remedies, are evaluated.  The review of individual loans includes those loans that are impaired as defined by ASC 310-10-35, Impairment of a Loan.  We evaluate the collectability of both principal and interest when assessing the need for loss provision.  Historical loss rates are analyzed and applied to other commercial loansloan segments not subject to specific allocations.  The ALLL allocation for this pool of commercial loans is established based on the historical average, maximum, minimum, and median loss ratios.

59

A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that CTBI will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due.  Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial and construction loans by either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.individual evaluation.

Homogenous loans, such as consumer installment, residential mortgages, and home equity lines are not individually risk graded.  The associated ALLLACL for these loans is measured in pools with similar risk characteristics under ASC 450, Contingencies.326.

When any secured commercial loan is considered uncollectable, whether past due or not, a current assessment of the value of the underlying collateral is made.  If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the collateral, the loan is placed on nonaccrual and the loan is charged down to the value of the collateral less estimated cost to sell or a specific reserve equal to the difference between book value of the loan and the fair value assigned to the collateral is created until such time as the loan is foreclosed.  When the foreclosed collateral has been legally assigned to CTBI, the estimated fair value of the collateral less costs to sell is then transferred to other real estate owned or other repossessed assets, and a charge-off is taken for any remaining balance.  When any unsecured commercial loan is considered uncollectable the loan is charged off no later than at 90 days past due.

All closed-end consumer loans (excluding conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate) are charged off no later than 120 days (5 monthly payments) delinquent.  If a loan is considered uncollectable, it is charged off earlier than 120 days delinquent.  For conventional 1-4 family residential loans and installment and revolving loans secured by real estate, when a loan is 90 days past due, a current assessment of the value of the real estate is made.  If the balance of the loan exceeds the fair value of the property, the loan is placed on nonaccrual.  Foreclosure proceedings are normally initiated after 120 days.  When the foreclosed property has been legally assigned to CTBI, the fair value less estimated costs to sell is transferred to other real estate owned and the remaining balance is taken as a charge-off.

Historical loss rates for loans are adjusted for significant factors that, in management’s judgment, reflect the impact of any current conditions on loss recognition.  We use twelve rolling quartersWith the implementation of ASC 326, weighted average life (“WAL”) calculations were completed as a tool to determine the life of CTBI’s various loan segments.  Vintage modeling was used to determine the life of loan losses for our historical loss rate analysis.  Factors that we considerconsumer and residential real estate loans.  Static pool modeling was used to determine the life of loan losses for commercial loan segments.  Qualitative factors used to derive CTBI’s total ACL include delinquency trends, current economic conditions and trends, strength of supervision and administration of the loan portfolio, levels of underperforming loans, level of recoveries to prior year’s charge-offs, trends in loan losses, industry concentrations and their relative strengths, amount of unsecured loans, and underwriting exceptions.  With the implementation of ASC 326, forecasting factors including unemployment rates, and industry specific forecasts for industries in which our total exposure is 5% of capital or greater are also included as factors in the ACL model.  Management continually reevaluates the other subjective factors included in its ALLLACL analysis.

Troubled Debt Restructurings – Troubled debt restructurings are certain loans that have been modified where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced financial difficulties. These concessions typically result from our loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance or other actions.  Modifications of terms for our loans and their inclusion as troubled debt restructurings are based on individual facts and circumstances.  Loan modifications that are included as troubled debt restructurings may involve either an increase or reduction of the interest rate, extension of the term of the loan, or deferral of principal and/or interest payments, regardless of the period of the modification.  All of the loans identified as troubled debt restructuring were modified due to financial stress of the borrower.  In order to determine if a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed to determine the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification.  This evaluation is performed under CTBI’s internal underwriting policy.

66
When we modify loans and leases in a troubled debt restructuring, we evaluate any possible impairment based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the contractual interest rate of the original loan agreement, or use the current fair value of the collateral, less selling costs for collateral dependent loans. If we determined that the value of the modified loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan (net of previous charge-offs, deferred loan fees or costs and unamortized premium or discount), impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge-off to the allowance. In periods subsequent to modification, we evaluate troubled debt restructurings, including those that have payment defaults, for possible impairment and recognize impairment through the allowance.

Other Real Estate Owned – When foreclosed properties are acquired, appraisals are obtained and the properties are booked at the current fair market value less expected sales costs.  Additionally, periodic updated appraisals are obtained on unsold foreclosed properties.  When an updated appraisal reflects a fair market value below the current book value, a charge is booked to current earnings to reduce the property to its new fair market value less expected sales costs.  Our policy for determining the frequency of periodic reviewsPreviews is based upon consideration of the specific properties and the known or perceived market fluctuations in a particular market and is typically between 12 and 18 months but generally not more than 24 months.  All revenues and expenses related to the carrying of other real estate owned are recognized through the income statement.

60

Income Taxes – Income tax expense is based on the taxes due on the consolidated tax return plus deferred taxes based on the expected future tax benefits and consequences of temporary differences between carrying amounts and tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates.  Any interest and penalties incurred in connection with income taxes are recorded as a component of income tax expense in the consolidated financial statements.  During the three and ninesix months ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 and 2018,2019, CTBI has not recognized a significant amount of interest expense or penalties in connection with income taxes.

As a bank doing business in Kentucky, CTB is subject to a capital-based Kentucky bank franchise tax and exempt from Kentucky corporate income tax.  However, in March 2019, Kentucky enacted HB354, which will transition CTB from the bank franchise tax to a corporate income tax beginning January 1, 2021.  The current Kentucky corporate income tax rate is 5%.  As of March 31, 2019, CTBI recorded a deferred tax liability, net of the federal benefit, of $1.0 million due to the enactment of HB354.

In April 2019, Kentucky enacted HB458.  HB458 allows for combined state income tax filing with CTBI, CTB, and CTIC.  CTBI had previously filed a separate company return and generated net operating losses, in which it had maintained a valuation allowance against the related deferred tax asset.  HB458 also allows for certain net operating losses to be utilized on a combined return.  CTBI expects to file a combined return, beginning in 2021, and to utilize these previously generated losses.  The tax benefit recorded in the second quarter 2019 to reverse the valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset for these losses was $3.6 million.


Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Interest rate risk management focuses on maintaining consistent growth in net interest income within Board-approved policy limits.  CTBI uses an earnings simulation model to analyze net interest income sensitivity to movements in interest rates.  Given a 200 basis point increase to the yield curve used in the simulation model, it is estimated net interest income for CTBI would increase by 5.775.79 percent over one year and 8.5410.37 percent over two years.  A 20025 basis point decrease in the yield curve would decrease net interest income by an estimated 4.980.77 percent over one year and 8.802.10 percent over two years.  For further discussion of CTBI’s market risk, see the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Market Risk included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019.

61

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

CTBI’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective disclosure controls and procedures, as defined under Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out by CTBI’s management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and the Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Treasurer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures.  Based on this evaluation, management concluded that disclosure controls and procedures as of SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 were effective in ensuring material information required to be disclosed in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis.

67
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There were no changes in CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended SeptemberJune 30, 20192020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, CTBI’s internal control over financial reporting.


PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.Legal ProceedingsNone
   
Item 1A.Risk Factors 

CTBI is subject to a number of risk factors that may affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition, including those disclosed in CTBI’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2019, and the following additional risk factor:

Financial institutions, including CTBI, must transition from LIBORCOVID-19-Related Risk
Since March 13, 2020, the United States has been operating under a state of emergency declared by President Trump in response to an alternative reference rate.the spread of COVID-19.  COVID-19 and related governmental responses have affected economic and financial market conditions as well as the operations, results, and prospects of companies across many industries.

LIBOR will cease to exist as a published rate after 2021.  The Federal Reserve throughcoronavirus pandemic has caused increased volatility in financial markets and the Alternative Reference Rate Committee has recommended a replacement benchmark rate, the Secured Overnight Financing Rate.  All loans extending beyond 2021 will need to be managed to ensure appropriate benchmark rate replacements are provided forpossibility of prolonged adverse economic conditions.  These changes in economic and adopted.  Failure to identify and negotiate a replacement benchmark rate and/or update data processing systemsfinancial market conditions could result in futuredecreases in demand for products, decreases in market value of loans and securities, impairments of intangible assets (such as goodwill), decreases in income due to interest rate risk not being mitigateddeclines, and increases in customer delinquencies and defaults.There is uncertainty around the duration and breadth of the COVID-19 pandemic, and as intendeda result the ultimate impact on our business, financial condition or interest being miscalculated, which could adversely impact CTBI’soperating results cannot be reasonably estimated at this time.  While we expect the impacts of COVID-19 to have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations, we are unable to predict the extent or nature of these impacts at this time.  Public health officials have recommended and mandated precautions to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, including prohibitions on congregating in heavily populated areas and shelter-in-place orders or similar measures.  As a result, we have temporarily adjusted branch operations, decreased lobby usage, encouraged drive-thru and ATM use along with internet banking, had employees work remotely or work split-shifts when possible, implemented social distancing guidelines, and consolidated operations.

Loan and Credit Losses. To combat the spread of COVID-19, and, in some cases, in response to governmental mandates to close non-essential businesses, many businesses have ceased or substantially reduced operations for an indeterminate period.  In addition, individuals may have been laid off, furloughed, or be unable to work as a result of reduced business operations.  AsThese situations could lead to a material change in the credit quality of September 30, 2019, CTBI had approximately $28.6 millionour loan portfolio.

Industry Concentration. Certain industries have been or are likely to be more impacted by COVID-19 than others.  The impact to the agriculture industry, bank holding companies, the hotel/motel industry, lessors of non-residential buildings, and lessors of residential buildings/dwellings could lead to significant deterioration in variable rate loansour asset quality.

Small and $48.8 million in available-for-sale securities with interest rates tied to LIBOR, substantially allMid-Size Business Concentration. It is expected that small and mid-size businesses, many of which rely on continuing cash flow to fund day-to-day operations, may be particularly hard hit by forced closures and other preventative measures taken by federal, state, or local governments.  Although government programs have maturity dates beyond December 31, 2021.  In addition, CTBI has debentures outstandingsought, and may further seek, to provide relief to these types of entities, there can be no assurance that these programs will succeed.  Also, governments may continue to adopt regulations or promulgate executive orders that restrict or limit banks’ ability to take certain actions with these customers that they would otherwise take in the principal amountordinary course—such as following standard collection and foreclosure procedures.  At the same time, it may be the case that more customers are expected to draw on existing lines of $57.8 million which mature in 2037 and bear interest at a rate tiedcredit or seek additional loans to LIBOR.

Moreover, financial institution contracts linked to LIBOR are widespread and intertwined with numerous financial products and services.  The downstream effect of unwinding or transitioning such contracts could cause instability and negatively impact financial markets and individual institutions.  The uncertainty surrounding the transition from LIBOR could adversely affect the U.S. financial system more broadly.help finance their business operations.

6268
Capital and Liquidity. Market volatility and prolonged periods of economic stress may affect our capital and liquidity.  In addition, these factors may limit access to capital markets.  Risks to credit portfolios and/or increased draws on outstanding lines of credit could affect capital and liquidity at, and/or result in decreased income or increased losses for, our bank subsidiary.   Changes to our capital and liquidity could lead to the need to cease or reduce dividend payments and any formal or informal actions regulators may take to address capital and liquidity concerns.

Suspension of Mortgage and Other Loan Payments and Foreclosures. The federal government signed into law on March 27, 2020 Title IV of the CARES Act, which provides that individuals with single-family, federally backed mortgages may request a 180-day mortgage forbearance (which can be extended another 180 days) due to COVID-19-related difficulties.  It is possible that other states or federal regulators take similar measures.  The bank implemented relief actions for our customers including suspension of residential foreclosure actions through May 18, 2020 and several loan assistance programs designed to assist those customers who are experiencing, or, are likely to experience, financial difficulties directly related to COVID-19 causing loss of individual income and/or household income.  At June 30, 2020, we had 3,668 COVID-19 loan deferrals totaling $756.6 million

Real Estate Market and Real Estate Lending. In addition to the actions described above, there is risk that COVID-19 significantly affects the U.S. commercial and residential real estate markets and, accordingly, our real estate lending business in other ways, including through low U.S. mortgage rates (which reached an all-time low during the first quarter), decreasing property values (which, among other effects, may both increase the risk of defaults and reduce the value of real estate collateral, thereby diminishing recovery in the event of default), and reduced demand for commercial and multifamily real estate and increased vacancies if businesses fail or close locations.

Catastrophes, including Pandemics and Contagious Illnesses. The length of the COVID-19 outbreak is unknown and unpredictable and there is a potential for additional waves of COVID-19 or new strains of coronavirus even after COVID-19 appears contained in an area.

Cybersecurity. We face increased cybersecurity risks due to employees working remotely.  Increased levels of remote access create additional opportunities for cybercriminals to exploit vulnerabilities, and employees may be more susceptible to phishing and social engineering attempts due to increased stress caused by the crisis and from balancing family and work responsibilities at home.  Cybercriminals may also prey on fears about COVID-19, and take advantage of the current environment in which legitimate information regarding COVID-19 is being frequently and widely disseminated, such as by including malware in emails that appear to include documents providing legitimate information for protecting oneself from COVID-19.  In addition, technological resources may be strained due to the number of remote users.

Changes in Consumer Behavior. Consumers affected by COVID-19 may continue to demonstrate changed behavior even after the crisis is over.  For example, consumers may decrease discretionary spending on a permanent or long-term basis, certain industries may take longer to recover (particularly those that rely on travel or large gatherings) as consumers may be hesitant to return to full social interaction, and temporary closures of bank branches could result in consumers becoming more comfortable with technology and devaluing face-to-face interaction.

Reliance on Vendors and Other Companies. We rely on vendors and other third parties to provide critical systems and services.  COVID-19 presents heightened or novel risks with respect to continuity of critical services.  These risks include the possibility of closure or business interruption.  In addition, although in most regions subject to a stay-at-home order the definition of essential services generally includes businesses that provide essential services to banks, the definitions vary by state and may result in some vendors not being able to work from their offices.

69
Changes to Interest Rates. In response to COVID-19, the Federal Reserve reduced the Federal Funds Rate to zero percent in March 2020.  The outlook for the remainder of 2020 is uncertain, and there is a possibility that the Federal Reserve keeps interest rates low or even uses negative interest rates if economic conditions warrant.  The sudden decrease in interest rates and any risks associated with the possibility of an extended period of operations in a zero- or negative-rate environment, has the potential for significantly decreased profitability.

Other Impacts on Financial Condition. A prolonged pandemic event may have a number of effects on our financial condition.  Decreases in our stock price and cash flow projections as a result of COVID-19 could result in goodwill impairment.  In addition, a period of prolonged losses or decreased earnings could result in the expiration of deferred tax assets (“DTA”) before we have the opportunity to use some or all of the benefit of the DTA.  Changes in our assessment of whether the full benefit of DTAs may be realized could impact our regulatory capital.  We may also be at risk of being required to recognize other-than-temporary impairments and/or reduce other comprehensive income.

Impact to Investment Management Business Lines. Volatile market conditions caused by COVID-19 could reduce the value of assets under management and/or cause clients to withdraw funds.

LIBOR Transition Planning. Banking institutions have been planning for the transition away from LIBOR in advance of December 31, 2021, the date that LIBOR is generally expected to cease to exist, although the U.K. Financial Conduct Authority has expressed that it and the Bank of England are assessing the impacts of COVID-19 on progress to meet the expected deadline.  It remains unclear, however, whether the cessation of LIBOR will be delayed due to COVID-19 or what form any delay may take, and there are no assurances that there will be a delay.  It is also unclear what the duration and severity of COVID-19 will be, and whether this will impact LIBOR transition planning.  COVID-19 may also slow regulators’ and others’ efforts to develop and implement alternative reference rates, which could make LIBOR transition planning more difficult, particularly if the cessation of LIBOR is not delayed but alternatives do not develop.

PPP Loan Participation. As a participating lender in the SBA Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”), CTBI and CTB are subject to additional risks of litigation from CTB’s clients or other parties in connection with the CTB’s processing of loans for the PPP and risks that the SBA may not fund some or all PPP loan guaranties.

On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was enacted, which included a $349 billion loan program administered through the SBA referred to as the PPP.  Under the PPP, small businesses, eligible nonprofits and certain others can apply for loans from existing SBA lenders and other approved regulated lenders that enroll in the program, subject to numerous limitations and eligibility criteria.  Under the terms of the PPP, loans are to be fully guaranteed by the SBA.  CTB is participating as a lender in the PPP. Because of the short timeframe between the passing of the CARES Act and the April 3, 2020 opening of the PPP, there is some ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP, which exposes CTBI to risks relating to noncompliance with the PPP. On or about April 16, 2020, the SBA notified lenders that the $349 billion earmarked for the PPP was exhausted. Congress approved additional funding for the PPP (increasing the total to $670 billion) and the related new legislation was enacted on April 24, 2020. Since the opening of the PPP, several larger banks have been subject to litigation relating to the policies and procedures that they used in processing applications for the PPP.  CTBI and CTB may be exposed to the risk of litigation, from both customers and non-customers that have approached CTB in connection with PPP loans and its policies and procedures used in processing applications for the PPP.  If any such litigation is filed against CTBI or CTB and is not resolved in a manner favorable to CTBI or CTB, it may result in significant financial liability or adversely affect CTBI’s reputation.  In addition, litigation can be costly, regardless of outcome.  Any financial liability, litigation costs or reputational damage caused by PPP-related litigation could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

70
CTB also has credit risk on PPP loans if a determination is made by the SBA that there is a deficiency in the manner in which the loan was originated, funded, or serviced by CTB, such as an issue with the eligibility of a borrower to receive a PPP loan, which may or may not be related to the ambiguity in the laws, rules and guidance regarding the operation of the PPP. In the event of a loss resulting from a default on a PPP loan and a determination by the SBA that there was a deficiency in the manner in which the PPP loan was originated, funded, or serviced by CTBI, the SBA may deny its liability under the guaranty, reduce the amount of the guaranty, or, if it has already paid under the guaranty, seek recovery of any loss related to the deficiency from CTB.

Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a)None
(b)None
(c)Purchases of equity securities by the issuer.

The following table presents information relating to CTBI’s purchases of its equity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2020.

Period
Total number of
shares purchased
Average price paid
 per share
Total number of
 shares purchased
as part of publicly
announced plan or
programs (1)
Maximum number
of shares that may
 be purchased
under the plans or
 programs (1)
January 20200$--067,370
February 20200--067,370
March 202032,66433.6432,6641,034,706
April 20200--01,034,706
May 20200--01,034,706
June 20200--01,034,706
Total32,664$33.6432,6641,034,706

(1)  On March 9, 2020, the Board of Directors of CTBI approved an increase to its stock repurchase program of up to an additional 1,000,000 shares of CTBI’s outstanding common stock.  At the time the increase was approved, there were 67,370 shares remaining under CTBI’s existing stock repurchase program, which began in December 1998 with the authorization to acquire up to 500,000 shares and was increased by an additional 1,000,000 shares in July 2000 and May 2003.  As of June 30, 2020, a total of 2,465,294 shares have been repurchased through this program.

71

Item 3.Defaults Upon Senior SecuritiesNone
   
Item 4.Mine Safety DisclosureNot applicable
   
Item 5.Other Information: 
 CTBI’s Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer have furnished to the SEC the certifications with respect to this Form 10-Q that are required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 
   
Item 6.Exhibits: 
 (1)    Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
 (2)    Certifications Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2
 (3)    XBRL Instance Document – the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRLExhibit 101.INS
 (4)    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentExhibit 101.SCH
 (5)    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation LinkbaseExhibit 101.CAL
 (6)    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition LinkbaseExhibit 101.DEF
 (7)    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label LinkbaseExhibit 101.LAB
 (8)    XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation LinkbaseExhibit 101.PRE
 (9)    Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)Exhibit 104

63

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, CTBI has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 COMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP, INC.
  
Date:  November 8, 2019August 7, 2020By:
  
 /s/ Jean R. Hale
 Jean R. Hale
 Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer
  
 /s/ Kevin J. Stumbo
 Kevin J. Stumbo
 Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer,
 and Treasurer




64
72