| Item 2. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
All references in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Form 10Q)10-Q”) to “we,” “our,” “us” and the “Company,” refer to Lincoln Educational Services Corporation and its subsidiaries unless the context indicates otherwise.
The following discussion may contain forward-looking statements regarding the Company, our business, prospects and our results of operations that are subject to certain risks and uncertainties posed by many factors and events that could cause our actual business, prospects and results of operations to differ materially from those that may be anticipated by such forward-looking statements. Such statements may be identified by the use of words such as “expect,” “estimate,” “assume,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “may,” “will,” “forecast,” “outlook,” “plan,” “project,” or similar words, and include, without limitation, statements relating to future enrollment, revenues, revenues per student, earnings growth, operating expenses, capital expenditures and effect of pandemics such as the COVID-19 pandemic and its ultimate effect on the Company’s business and results. These statements are based on the Company’s current expectations and are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Additional factors that could cause or contribute to differences between our actual results and those anticipated include, but are not limited to, those described in the “Risk Factors” section of our Form 10-K and in our other filings with the SEC. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to revise any forward-looking statements in order to reflect events or circumstances that may subsequently arise. Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this Quarterly Report and in our other reports filed with the SEC that advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business.
The interim financial statements and related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and the discussions contained herein should be read in conjunction with the annual financial statements and notes thereto included in our Form 10-K which includes audited consolidated financial statements for our two fiscal years ended December 31, 2021.
General
The Company provides diversified career-oriented post-secondary education to recent high school graduates and working adults. The Company offers programs in automotive technology, skilled trades (which include HVAC, welding and computerized numerical control and electrical and electronic systems technology, among other programs), healthcare services (which include nursing, dental assistant and medical administrative assistant, among other programs), hospitality services (which include culinary, therapeutic massage, cosmetology and aesthetics) and information technology programs. The schools, currently consisting of 22 schools in 14 states, operate under Lincoln Technical Institute, Lincoln College of Technology, Lincoln Culinary Institute, and Euphoria Institute of Beauty Arts and Sciences and associated brand names. Most of the campuses serve major metropolitan markets and each typically offers courses in multiple areas of study. Five of the campuses are destination schools, which attract students from across the United States and, in some cases, from abroad. The Company’s other campuses primarily attract students from their local communities and surrounding areas. All of the campuses are nationally or regionally accredited and are eligible to participate in federal financial aid programs by the DOE and applicable state education agencies and accrediting commissions, which allow students to apply for and access federal student loans as well as other forms of financial aid.
Our business is organized into two reportable business segments: (a) Transportation and Skilled Trades, and (b) Healthcare and Other Professions or “HOPS”.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
For a description of our critical accounting policies and estimates, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates” and Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in our Form 10-K and Note 1 to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,September 30, 2022.
In addition, due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, we have reassessed those of our accounting policies whose application places the most significant demands on management’s judgment, for instance, revenue recognition, allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill, and long-lived assets, stock-based compensation, derivative instruments and hedging activity, borrowings, assumptions related to ROU assets, lease cost, income taxes and assets and obligations related to employee benefit plans. Such reassessments did not have a significant impact on our results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Effect of Inflation
Inflation has not had a material effect on our operations except for some inflationary pressures on certain instructional expenses.expenses including consumables and in instances where potential students have not wanted to incur additional debt or increased travel expense.
Results of Continuing Operations for the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2022
The following table sets forth selected condensed consolidated statements of operations data as a percentage of revenues for each of the periods indicated:
| | | Three Months Ended March 31, | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | 2022 | | | 2021 | | | 2022 | | 2021 | | 2022 | | 2021 | |
| Revenue | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % | | 100.0 | % |
| Costs and expenses: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Educational services and facilities | | 43.8 | % | | 41.5 | % | | 43.5 | % | | 42.8 | % | | 43.8 | % | | 42.1 | % |
| Selling, general and administrative | | | 56.5 | % | | | 50.8 | % | | 51.2 | % | | 50.8 | % | | 54.4 | % | | 51.8 | % |
| Loss (gain) on sale of assets | | | | 0.0 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | -0.1 | % | | | 0.0 | % |
| Total costs and expenses | | | 100.4 | % | | | 92.3 | % | | | 94.7 | % | | | 93.6 | % | | | 98.1 | % | | | 93.9 | % |
| Operating (loss) income | | -0.4 | % | | 7.7 | % | |
| Operating income | | | 5.3 | % | | 6.4 | % | | 1.9 | % | | 6.1 | % |
| Interest expense, net | | | -0.1 | % | | | -0.3 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | -0.3 | % | | | 0.0 | % | | | -0.4 | % |
| (Loss) income from operations before income taxes | | -0.4 | % | | 7.4 | % | |
| (Benefit) provision for income taxes | | | -0.8 | % | | | 1.6 | % | |
| Income from operations before income taxes | | | 5.3 | % | | 6.1 | % | | 1.9 | % | | 5.8 | % |
| Provision for income taxes | | | | 1.4 | % | | | 1.8 | % | | | 0.3 | % | | | 1.4 | % |
| Net income | | | 0.3 | % | | | 5.8 | % | | | 3.9 | % | | | 4.3 | % | | | 1.6 | % | | | 4.3 | % |
Three Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2022 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2021
Consolidated Results of Operations
Revenue. Revenue. Revenue increased $4.6$2.7 million, or 5.8%3.1% to $82.6$91.8 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 from $78.0$89.1 million in the prior year comparable period.The revenue increase was driven by a 5.9% increase in revenue was mainly due to a 4.4% increase in average student population, driven by the higher beginning population of approximately 740 more students at the start of 2022 than in 2021. In addition, average revenue per student rose 1.3% overwhich more than offset a 2.7% decline in the prior year comparable period also contributingaverage student population for the quarter. Average student population declined as a result of the 9.2% decline in new student starts for the quarter compared to last year. The higher revenue per student resulted from tuition increases combined with more efficient program delivery through the growth.roll-out of the Company’s new hybrid teaching model. The hybrid model delivers higher daily revenue rates in certain programs as their overall duration can be shortened.
For a general discussion of trends in our student enrollment, see “Seasonality and Outlook” below.
Educational services and facilities expense. Our educational services and facilities expense increased $3.9$1.8 million, or 11.9%4.8% to $36.2$39.9 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 from $32.3$38.1 million in the prior year comparable period. Increased costs were primarily concentrated in instructional expense and facilities expense.
Instructional salaries increased mainly due to market adjustments and largerhigher staffing levels as a result of population growth, program expansion andin addition to expenses incurred in connection with the returntransition to normalized levels of in-person instruction post COVID-19 restrictions. In addition, consumables prices rose sharply driven by the on-going inflation spike impacted and supply-chain shortages.our new hybrid teaching model.
Facility expenses increased as a result of approximately $0.8 million of additional rent expense from the sale leaseback transaction relating to our Denver and Grand Prairie campuses consummated in the fourth quarter of 2021 and higher maintenance costs.2021.
Educational services and facilities expense, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 43.5% from 42.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expense. Our selling, general and administrative expense increased $1.8 million, or 3.9% to $47.0 million for the three months ended September 30, 2022, from $45.2 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase was driven by several factors, including increased salary and benefits expense driven by higher salary and medical claims, severance expense as we better align our cost structure in certain functions, additional spending for the centralization of financial aid, expected to be completed by year-end and one-time expenses in connection with growth initiatives.
Selling, general and administrative expense, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 51.2% from 50.8% for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Net interest expense. Net interest expense decreased by approximately $0.3 million, or 87.7% to less than $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2022 from $0.3 million in the prior year comparable period. The decrease in expense was due to the payoff of all outstanding debt during the fourth quarter of the prior year in connection with the sale leaseback transaction.
Income taxes. Our income tax provision for the three months ended September 30, 2022 was $1.3 million, or 26.8% of pre-tax income, compared to $1.6 million, or 29.6% of pre-tax income, in the prior year comparable period. The decrease in effective tax rate was due to a higher discrete benefit relating to restricted stock vesting.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
Consolidated Results of Operations
Revenue. Revenue increased $9.0 million, or 3.6% to $256.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 from $247.5 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase in revenue was driven by several factors including a slight increase in average student population, beginning the year with approximately 740 more students than in the prior year comparable period, average revenue per student, up 2.7% driven by tuition increases combined with more efficient program delivery through the roll-out of the Company’s new hybrid teaching model. The hybrid model delivers higher daily revenue rates in certain programs as their overall duration can be shortened.
For a general discussion of trends in our student enrollment, see “Seasonality and Outlook” below.
Educational services and facilities expense. Our educational services and facilities expense increased $8.1 million, or 7.8% to $112.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 from $104.1 million in the prior year comparable period. Increased costs were primarily concentrated in instructional expense and facilities expense.
Instructional salaries increased mainly due to higher staffing levels in addition to expenses incurred in connection with the transition to our new hybrid teaching model. Further contributing to the increase were current market conditions, program expansion and the return to normalized levels of in-person instruction post COVID-19 restrictions. In addition, consumables prices rose sharply driven by on-going inflation and supply chain shortages
Facility expenses increased as a result of approximately $2.4 million of additional rent expense relating to our Denver and Grand Prairie campuses which are now leased subsequent to the consummation of the sale leaseback transaction relating to those campuses in the fourth quarter of 2021.
Educational services and facilities expense, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 43.8% from 41.5%42.1% for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Selling, general and administrative expense. Our selling, general and administrative expense increased $7.1$11.3 million, or 17.8%8.9% to $46.7$139.5 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 from $39.6$128.2 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily driven by several factors including additional bad debt expense, increased salaries and benefits expense, severance and stock compensation related to severance, additional salary expense relating to bad debt, investmentssales aimed at continuing to grow high school population, increased spending in marketing, $0.9 millionstudent services and career services as staffing levels were increased to accommodate an increasing number of additional stock compensation expensestudents graduating and severance in addition to assist with placements of graduates and lastly, one-time expenses made in connection with initiatives to streamline operations of approximately $0.8 million.growth initiatives.
Bad debt expense for the first quarter ofnine months ended September 30, 2021 was lower than historical amounts due to an adjustment made in the first quarter of 2021 to qualifying student accounts receivables as permitted by the Higher Education Emergency Relieve Funds (“HEERF”). In accordance with the applicable guidance, the Company combined HEERF funding with Company funds to provide financial relief to students who dropped from school due to COVID-19 related circumstances with unpaid accounts receivable balances during the period from March 15, 2020 to March 31, 2021. The relief resulted in a net benefit to bad debt expense of approximately $3.0 million. Without this adjustment bad debt expense for the first quarter of 2022 as a percentage of total revenue, would have been comparable to that reported in the prior year comparable period.
Marketing investments increased $1.2 million quarter over quarter as a result of additional expenditures primarily in paid social media channels utilizing video and display advertising to reach a younger audience demographic. Increased investments in marketing are intended to yield positive returns during second half of the year.
Selling, general and administrative expense, as a percentage of revenue, increased to 56.5%54.4% from 50.8%51.8% for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Gain on sale of assets. Gain on sale of assets increased to $0.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 from less than $0.1 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase year over year was the result of the sale of our Suffield, Connecticut property during the second quarter of 2022, which was previously a former campus. Net proceeds received from the sale were approximately $2.4 million resulting in a $0.2 million gain in the current year.
Net interest expense. Net interest expense decreased by approximately $0.2$0.8 million, or 84.9%87.0% to less than $0.1 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 from $0.3$0.9 million in the prior year comparable period. The decrease in expense was due to the payoff of all outstanding debt during the fourth quarter of last year in connection with the sale leaseback transaction.
Income taxes. Our benefit for income taxes was $0.6 milliontax provision for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 was $0.8 million, or 15.7% of pre-tax income, compared to a provision for$3.6 million, or 25.0% of pre-tax income, taxes of $1.2 million in the prior year comparable period. The benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2022decrease in effective tax rate was due primarily to a pre-tax book loss and ahigher discrete itembenefit relating to restricted stock vesting, while the provision in the prior year was due to the release of the valuation allowance as of December 31, 2020. The effective tax rate for the three months ending March 31, 2022 was 28.2%.vesting.
Segment Results of Operations
We operate our business in two reportable segments: (a) the Transportation and Skilled Trades segment; and (b) the Healthcare and Other Professions (“HOPS”) segment. The Company also utilizes the Transitional segment solely when and if it closes a school. Our reportable segments have been determined based on a method by which we now evaluate performance and allocate resources. Each reportable segment represents a group of post-secondary education providers that offer a variety of degree and non-degree academic programs. These segments are organized by key market segments to enhance operational alignment within each segment to more effectively execute our strategic plan. Each of the Company’s schools is a reporting unit and an operating segment. Our operating segments are described below.
Transportation and Skilled Trades – The Transportation and Skilled Trades segment offers academic programs mainly in the career-oriented disciplines of transportation and skilled trades (e.g. automotive, diesel, HVAC, welding and manufacturing).
Healthcare and Other Professions – The Healthcare and Other Professions segment offers academic programs in the career-oriented disciplines of health sciences, hospitality and business and information technology (e.g. dental assistant, medical assistant, practical nursing, culinary arts and cosmetology).
We evaluate segment performance based on operating results. Adjustments to reconcile segment results to consolidated results are included under the caption “Corporate,” which primarily includes unallocated corporate activity.
The following table presents results for our two reportable segments for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 and 2021:
| | | Three Months Ended March 31, | | | Three Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | 2022 | | | 2021 | | | % Change | | | 2022 | | 2021 | | % Change | |
| Revenue: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades | | $ | 58,784 | | | $ | 55,670 | | | 5.6 | % | | $ | 67,329 | | $ | 64,950 | | 3.7 | % |
| Healthcare and Other Professions | | | 23,770 | | | | 22,326 | | | | 6.5 | % | | | 24,484 | | | 24,109 | | | 1.6 | % |
| Total | | $ | 82,554 | | | $ | 77,996 | | | | 5.8 | % | | $ | 91,813 | | $ | 89,059 | | | 3.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating (Loss) Income: | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Income (loss): | | | | | | | | |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades | | $ | 7,245 | | | $ | 12,324 | | | -41.2 | % | | $ | 11,768 | | $ | 11,842 | | -0.6 | % |
| Healthcare and Other Professions | | 1,307 | | | 2,949 | | | -55.7 | % | | 1,180 | | 1,833 | | -35.6 | % |
| Corporate | | | (8,878 | ) | | | (9,254 | ) | | | 4.1 | % | | | (8,068 | ) | | | (7,930 | ) | | | -1.7 | % |
| Total | | $ | (326 | ) | | $ | 6,019 | | | | -105.4 | % | | $ | 4,880 | | $ | 5,745 | | | -15.1 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Starts: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades | | 2,178 | | | 2,339 | | | -6.9 | % | | 3,585 | | 3,976 | | -9.8 | % |
| Healthcare and Other Professions | | | 1,175 | | | | 1,209 | | | | -2.8 | % | | | 1,344 | | | 1,454 | | | -7.6 | % |
| Total | | | 3,353 | | | | 3,548 | | | | -5.5 | % | | | 4,929 | | | 5,430 | | | -9.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Average Population: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades | | 8,519 | | | 8,032 | | | 6.1 | % | | 8,748 | | 8,863 | | -1.3 | % |
| Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | - | | | | (15 | ) | | | 100.0 | % | | | - | | | (9 | ) | | | 100.0 | % |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades Excluding Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | 8,519 | | | | 8,017 | | | | 6.3 | % | | | 8,748 | | | 8,854 | | | -1.2 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Healthcare and Other Professions | | 4,365 | | | 4,409 | | | -1.0 | % | | 4,076 | | 4,326 | | -5.8 | % |
| Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | - | | | | (90 | ) | | | 100.0 | % | | | - | | | (2 | ) | | | 100.0 | % |
| Healthcare and Other Professions Excluding Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | 4,365 | | | | 4,319 | | | | 1.1 | % | | | 4,076 | | | 4,324 | | | -5.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 12,884 | | | | 12,441 | | | | 3.6 | % | | | 12,824 | | | 13,189 | | | -2.8 | % |
| Total Excluding Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | 12,884 | | | | 12,336 | | | | 4.4 | % | | | 12,824 | | | 13,178 | | | -2.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| End of Period Population: | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades | | 8,570 | | | 8,212 | | | 4.4 | % | | 9,298 | | 9,473 | | -1.8 | % |
| Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | - | | | | (19 | ) | | | 100.0 | % | |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades Excluding Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | 8,570 | | | | 8,193 | | | | 4.6 | % | |
| | | | | | | | | | | |
| Healthcare and Other Professions | | 4,404 | | | 4,532 | | | -2.8 | % | | | 4,288 | | | 4,533 | | | -5.4 | % |
| Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | - | | | | (79 | ) | | | 100.0 | % | |
| Healthcare and Other Professions Excluding Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | 4,404 | | | | 4,453 | | | | -1.1 | % | |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 12,974 | | | | 12,744 | | | | 1.8 | % | | | 13,586 | | | 14,006 | | | -3.0 | % |
| Total Excluding Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | 12,974 | | | | 12,646 | | | | 2.6 | % | |
Three Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2022 Compared to the Three Months Ended March 31,September 30, 2021
Transportation and Skilled Trades
Operating income was $7.2remained relatively flat at $11.8 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 compared to $12.3 millionand 2021. The changes in the prior year comparable period. The changerevenue and expenses quarter over quarter waswere driven by the following factors:
Revenue increased $3.1$2.4 million, or 5.6%3.7% to $58.8$67.3 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 from $55.7$64.9 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase in revenue was driven by a 6.3%Revenue increased due to the 4.9% increase in average revenue per student, population mainly driven by a higher beginning of period populationtuition increases and the greater efficiency through the hybrid delivery as detailed in the current yearconsolidated results of approximately 730 students.operations.
Educational services and facilities expense increased $2.6$0.9 million, or 12.0%3.6% to $24.5$27.7 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 from $21.9$26.8 million in the prior year comparable period. Increased costs were primarily concentrated in instructional expense and facilities expense. Instructional salaries increased mainly due to market adjustments and largerhigher staffing levels as a result of population growth, program expansion andin addition to expenses incurred in connection with the returntransition to normalized levels of in-person instruction post COVID-19 restrictions. In addition, consumables prices rose sharply driven byour new hybrid teaching model. Facility expense increases were the on-going inflation spike impacted and supply-chain shortages. Facility expenses increased as a result of approximately $0.8 million of additional rent expense from the sale leaseback transaction relating to our Denver and Grand Prairie campuses, consummatedwhich are now leased following the consummation of the sale leaseback transaction of these campuses in the fourth quarter of 20212021. Partially offsetting the additional costs were reductions in books and higher maintenance costs.tools expense.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $5.6$1.4 million, or 25.9%5.6% to $27.0$27.8 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 from $21.4$26.4 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily driven byIncreased costs were related to additional bad debt expensespending in student services and marketing investments, which are all discussed in more detail above in the consolidated resultscareer services as staffing levels were increased to accommodate an increasing number of operations.students graduating and to assist with placements of graduates.
Healthcare and Other Professions
Operating income was $1.3$1.2 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 compared to $2.9$1.8 million in the prior year comparable period. The change quarter over quarter was driven by the following factors:
Revenue increased $1.5by $0.4 million, or 6.5%1.6% to $23.8$24.5 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 from $22.3$24.1 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase in revenue was primarilyRevenue increased due to the result of a 5.3%7.7% increase in average revenue per student.student, driven by tuition increases and the greater efficiency through the hybrid delivery as detailed in the consolidated results of operations.
Educational services and facilities expense increased $1.2$0.9 million, or 11.8%7.5% to $11.6$12.2 million for the three months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 from $10.4$11.3 million in the prior year comparable period. Increased costs were primarily concentrated in instructional expense and facilities expense. Instructional salaries increased mainly due to market adjustments and largerhigher staffing levels asin addition to expenses incurred in connection with the transition to our new hybrid teaching model. Facility expense increases were primarily due to additional spending for common area maintenance quarter over quarter.
Selling, general and administrative expense remained essentially flat at $11.1 million and $10.9 million for each of the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
Corporate and Other
This category includes unallocated expenses incurred on behalf of the entire Company. Corporate and other expenses remained essentially flat at $8.1 million and $7.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
The following table presents results for our two reportable segments for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 and 2021:
| | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | 2022 | | | 2021 | | | % Change | |
| Revenue: | | | | | | | | | |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades | | $ | 184,087 | | | $ | 177,586 | | | | 3.7 | % |
| Healthcare and Other Professions | | | 72,423 | | | | 69,934 | | | | 3.6 | % |
| Total | | $ | 256,510 | | | $ | 247,520 | | | | 3.6 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Operating Income (loss): | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades | | $ | 26,108 | | | $ | 35,423 | | | | -26.3 | % |
| Healthcare and Other Professions | | | 4,095 | | | | 7,743 | | | | -47.1 | % |
| Corporate | | | (25,252 | ) | | | (27,949 | ) | | | 9.6 | % |
| Total | | $ | 4,951 | | | $ | 15,217 | | | | -67.5 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Starts: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades | | | 8,346 | | | | 8,824 | | | | -5.4 | % |
| Healthcare and Other Professions | | | 3,788 | | | | 3,857 | | | | -1.8 | % |
| Total | | | 12,134 | | | | 12,681 | | | | -4.3 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Average Population: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades | | | 8,527 | | | | 8,312 | | | | 2.6 | % |
| Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | - | | | | (16 | ) | | | 100.0 | % |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades Excluding Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | 8,527 | | | | 8,296 | | | | 2.8 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Healthcare and Other Professions | | | 4,254 | | | | 4,414 | | | | -3.6 | % |
| Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | - | | | | (44 | ) | | | 100.0 | % |
| Healthcare and Other Professions Excluding Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | 4,254 | | | | 4,370 | | | | -2.7 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Total | | | 12,781 | | | | 12,726 | | | | 0.4 | % |
| Total Excluding Leave of Absence - COVID-19 | | | 12,781 | | | | 12,666 | | | | 0.9 | % |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| End of Period Population: | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Transportation and Skilled Trades | | | 9,298 | | | | 9,473 | | | | -1.8 | % |
| Healthcare and Other Professions | | | 4,288 | | | | 4,533 | | | | -5.4 | % |
| Total | | | 13,586 | | | | 14,006 | | | | -3.0 | % |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2022 Compared to the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021
Transportation and Skilled Trades
Operating income was $26.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 compared to $35.4 million in the prior year comparable period. The change year over year was driven by the following factors:
Revenue increased $6.5 million, or 3.7% to $184.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 from $177.6 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase in revenue was primarily driven by a result2.8% increase in average student population mainly due to a higher beginning of period population growth,in the current year of approximately 730 students.
Educational services and facilities expense increased $5.1 million, or 7.2% to $76.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 from $71.4 million in the prior year comparable period. Increased costs were primarily concentrated in instructional expense and facilities expense. Instructional salaries increased mainly due to higher staffing levels in addition to expenses incurred in connection with the transition to our new hybrid teaching model. Further contributing to the increase were current market conditions, program expansion and the return to normalized levels of in-person instruction post COVID-19 restrictions. Increased facilitiesIn addition, consumables prices rose sharply driven by on-going inflation and supply chain shortages. Facility expense wasincreases were the result of approximately $2.4 million of additional spending for common area maintenancerent expense relating to our Denver and Grand Prairie campuses following the consummation of the sale leaseback transaction of these campuses in the fourth quarter over quarter.of 2021. Partially offsetting the additional facility costs are reductions in depreciation expense.
Selling, general and administrative expensesexpense increased $1.9$10.7 million, or 20.7%15.0% to $10.8$81.4 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 from $8.9$70.7 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily driven by additional bad debt expense, salary expense in sales and marketing investments, which are allincreased spending in student services and career services as discussed in more detail above in the consolidated results of operations.operations above.
Healthcare and Other Professions
Operating income was $4.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 compared to $7.7 million in the prior year comparable period. The change year over year was driven by the following factors:
| • | Revenue increased $2.5 million, or 3.6% to $72.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 from $69.9 million in the prior year comparable period. The revenue increase was driven by a 6.4% increase in average revenue per student which more than offset a 2.7% decline in the average student population for the quarter. Average student population declined as a result of the 1.8% decline in new student starts for the year. The higher revenue per student resulted from tuition increases combined with more efficient program delivery through the roll-out of the Company’s new hybrid teaching model. The hybrid model delivers higher daily revenue rates in certain programs as their overall duration can be shortened. |
Educational services and facilities expense increased $3.0 million, or 9.0% to $35.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 from $32.7 million in the prior year comparable period. Increased costs were primarily concentrated in instructional expense and facilities expense. Instructional salaries increased mainly due to higher staffing levels in addition to expenses incurred in connection with the transition to our new hybrid teaching model. Further contributing to the increase were current market conditions, program expansion and the return to normalized levels of in-person instruction post COVID-19 restrictions. Facility expense increases were primarily due to additional spending for common area maintenance year over year.
Selling, general and administrative expense increased $3.2 million, or 10.8% to $32.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 from $29.4 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase was primarily driven by additional bad debt expense, salary expense in sales and increased spending in student services and career services as discussed in the consolidated results of operations above.
Corporate and Other
This category includes unallocated expenses incurred on behalf of the entire Company. Corporate and other expenses were $8.9$25.3 million and $9.3$27.9 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The decrease in expense quarteryear over quarteryear was primarily driven by a reduction in incentive compensation partially offset by an increaseand a gain resulting from the sale of our Suffield, Connecticut property during the second quarter of 2022, which was previously a former campus. Partially offsetting these cost savings are increased salaries and benefits expenses in addition to severance and stock-based compensation andrelated to severance.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary capital requirements are for maintenance and expansion of our facilities and the development of new programs. Our principal sources of liquidity have been cash provided by operating activities and borrowings under our Credit Facility. The following chart summarizes the principal elements of our cash flow for each of the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively:
| | | Three Months Ended March 31, | | | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |
| | | 2022 | | | 2021 | | | 2022 | | 2021 | |
| Net cash used in operating activities | | $ | (14,367 | ) | | $ | (8,299 | ) | |
| Net cash provided by operating activities | | | $ | 612 | | $ | 17,750 | |
| Net cash used in investing activities | | (1,045 | ) | | (1,219 | ) | | (4,663 | ) | | (5,252 | ) |
| Net cash used in financing activities | | (2,296 | ) | | (1,766 | ) | | (9,637 | ) | | (3,374 | ) |
As of March 31,September 30, 2022, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $65.6$69.6 million compared to $83.3 million atas of December 31, 2021. The decrease in cash position from year end was the result of several factors including incentive compensation payments, share repurchases made under the seasonality of our businessshare repurchase plan, and a decrease in accrued expenses driven bynet income. Partially offsetting the paymentdecrease in cash and cash equivalents was $2.4 million in net proceeds received as a result of incentive compensation.the sale of a former campus located in Suffield, Connecticut executed during the second quarter of the current year.
On May 24, 2022, the Company announced that its Board of Directors has authorized a share repurchase program of up to $30.0 million of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The repurchase program has been authorized for 12 months. As of September 30, 2022, the Company repurchased 1,083,403 shares at a cost of approximately $6.7 million.
Our primary source of cash is tuition collected from our students. The majority of students enrolled at our schools rely on funds received under various government-sponsored student financial aid programs to pay a substantial portion of their tuition and other education-related expenses. The most significant source of student financing is Title IV Programs, which represented approximately 75% of our cash receipts relating to revenues in 2021. Pursuant to applicable regulations, students must apply for a new loan for each academic period. Federal regulations dictate the timing of disbursements of funds under Title IV Programs and loan funds are generally provided by lenders in two disbursements for each academic year. The first disbursement is usually received approximately 31 days after the start of a student’s academic year and the second disbursement is typically received at the beginning of the sixteenth week of the academic year. Certain types of grants and other funding are not subject to a 31-day delay. In certain instances, if a student withdraws from a program prior to a specified date, any paid but unearned tuition or prorated Title IV Program financial aid is refunded according to federal, state and accrediting agency standards.
As a result of the significant amount of Title IV Program funds received by our students, we are highly dependent on these funds to operate our business. Any reduction in the level of Title IV Program funds that our students are eligible to receive or any restriction on our eligibility to receive Title IV Program funds would have a significant impact on our operations and our financial condition. For more information, see Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors - Risks Related to Our Industry” of our Form 10-K.
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2022 compared to $17.8 million in the prior year comparable period. The cash used in or provided by operating activities is subject to changes in working capital, which at any point in time is subject to many variables including the timing of cash receipts and cash payments and vendor payment terms. For the nine months ended September 30, 2022 net cash used in operating activities was $14.4 million and $8.3 million for each of the three months ended March 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. For the three months ended March 31, 2022,driven by changes in our operating assets and liabilities resultedworking capital in cash outflows of $14.6 million, primarily attributableaddition to a $13.4 million increasedecrease in accounts receivable driven by the timing of collections.net earnings year over year.
Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $1.0$4.7 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 compared to $1.2$5.3 million in the prior year comparable period. The decrease in net cash used was driven by an increase in liquidity resulting from $2.4 million in net proceeds received from the sale of our former campus located in Suffield, Connecticut executed during the second quarter of the current year.
One of our primary uses of cash in investing activities was capital expenditures associated with investments in training technology, classroom furniture, and new program buildouts.
We currently lease a majority of our campuses. We own our former campus located in Suffield, Connecticut and our campus in Nashville, Tennessee, which currently is subject to a sale leaseback agreement (described elsewhere in this Form 10Q)10-Q) for the sale of the property which is currently expected to be consummated inwithin the third quarter of 2022.next 12 months.
Capital expenditures were 2% of revenues in 2021 and are expected to approximate 3% of revenues in 2022. We expect to fund future capital expenditures with cash generated from operating activities and cash on hand.
Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities was $2.3$9.6 million for the threenine months ended March 31,September 30, 2022 compared to $1.8$3.4 million in the prior year comparable period. The increase in net cash used of $0.5$6.2 million was primarily driven by a $1.0 million increase in net share settlements for taxes related to equity-based compensation, partially offset by a $0.5 million reduction in payment on borrowings driven by the retirementimplementation of our term loan using proceeds from the sale leaseback transaction of our Denver and Grand Prairie campuses consummateda share repurchase program during the fourthsecond quarter of the priorcurrent year.
Credit Facility
On November 14, 2019, the Company entered into a senior secured credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with its lender, Sterling National Bank (the “Lender”), providing for borrowing in the aggregate principal amount of up to $60 million (the “Credit Facility”). Initially, the Credit Facility was comprised of four facilities: (1) a $20 million senior secured term loan maturing on December 1, 2024 (the “Term Loan”), with monthly interest and principal payments based on a 120-month amortization with the outstanding balance due on the maturity date; (2) a $10 million senior secured delayed draw term loan maturing on December 1, 2024 (the “Delayed Draw Term Loan”), with monthly interest payments for the first 18 months and thereafter monthly payments of interest and principal based on a 120-month amortization and all balances due on the maturity date; (3) a $15 million senior secured committed revolving line of credit providing a sublimit of up to $10 million for standby letters of credit maturing on November 13, 2022 (the “Revolving Loan”), with monthly payments of interest only; and (4) a $15 million senior secured non-restoring line of credit maturing on January 31, 2021 (the “Line of Credit Loan”).
At the closing of the Credit Facility, the Company entered into a swap transaction with the Lender for 100% of the principal balance of the Term Loan maturing on the same date as the Term Loan. Under the terms of the Credit Facility accrued interest on each loan iswas payable monthly in arrears with the Term Loan and the Delayed Draw Term Loan bearing interest at a floating interest rate based on the then one monthone-month London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 3.50% and subject to a LIBOR interest rate floor of 0.25% if there iswas no swap agreement. Revolving Loans bearbore interest at a floating interest rate based on the then LIBOR plus an indicative spread determined by the Company’s leverage as defined in the Credit Agreement or, if the borrowing of a Revolving Loan iswas to be repaid within 30 days of such borrowing, the Revolving Loan will accrueaccrued interest at the Lender’s prime rate plus 0.50% with a floor of 4.0%. Line of Credit Loans bearbore interest at a floating interest rate based on the Lender’s prime rate of interest. Letters of credit issued under the Revolving Loan reduce,reduced, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the availability of borrowings under the Revolving Loan. Letters of credit arewere charged an annual fee equal to (i) an applicable margin determined by the leverage ratio of the Company less (ii) 0.25%, paid quarterly in arrears, in addition to the Lender’s customary fees for issuance, amendment and other standard fees. Borrowings under the Line of Credit Loan arewere secured by cash collateral. The Lender receivesreceived an unused facility fee of 0.50% per annum payable quarterly in arrears on the unused portions of the Revolving Loan and the Line of Credit Loan.
In addition to the foregoing, the Credit Agreement containscontained customary representations, warranties, and affirmative and negative covenants (including financial covenants that (i) restrictrestricted capital expenditures, (ii) restrictrestricted leverage, (iii) requirerequired maintaining minimum tangible net worth, (iv) requirerequired maintaining a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and (v) requirerequired the maintenance of a minimum of $5 million in quarterly average aggregate balances on deposit with the Lender, which, if not maintained, willwould result in the assessment of a quarterly fee of $12,500), as well as events of default customary for facilities of this type. The Credit Agreement also limited the payment of cash dividends during the first twenty-four months24-months of the agreement to $1.7 million but an amendment to the Credit Agreement entered into on November 10, 2020 raised the cash dividend limit to $2.3 million in such twenty-four-month24-month period to increase the amount of permitted cash dividends that the Company is permitted tocan pay on its Series A Preferred Stock.
As further discussed below, the Credit Facility was secured by a first priority lien in favor of the Lender on substantially all of the personal property owned by the Company, as well as a pledge of the stock and other equity in the Company’s subsidiaries and mortgages on parcels of real property owned by the Company in Colorado, Tennessee and Texas, at which three of the Company’s schools are located, as well as a former campusschool property owned by the Company located in Connecticut.
On September 23, 2021, in connection with entering into the agreements relating to the sale leaseback transaction for the Company’s Denver, Grand Prairie and Nashville campuses (collectively, the “Property Transactions”), the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into a Consent and Waiver Letter Agreement (the “Consent Agreement”) to the Company’s Credit Agreement with its lender.Lender. The Consent Agreement provides the Lender’s consent to the Property Transactions and waives certain covenants in the Credit Agreement, subject to certain specified conditions. In addition, in connection with the consummation of the Property Transactions, the Lender released its mortgages and other liens on the subject propertiessubject-properties upon the Company’s payment in full of the outstanding principal and accrued interest ofon the Term Loan and any swap obligations arising from any swap transaction. Upon the consummation of the sale leaseback transaction relating to the Denver and Grand Prairie campusesProperty Transaction on October 29, 2021 the Company paid the Lender approximately $16.7 million in repayment of the Term Loan and the swap termination fee. Nofee and no further borrowings may be made under the Term Loan or the Delayed Draw Term Loan. Further, during the second quarter of 2022, the Company sold a property located in Suffield, Connecticut for net proceeds of approximately $2.4 million. Prior to the consummation of the transaction, Lincoln obtained consent from the Lender to enter into the sale of this property.
Pursuant to certain amendments and modifications to the Credit Agreement and other loan documents, the Term Loan and the Delayed Draw Term Loan were paid off in full and on January 21, 2021, the Line of Credit expired by the terms, conditions and provisions of the Credit Agreement and the Credit Agreement was extended and would have matured on November 14, 2023.
As of March 31,September 30, 2022, and December 31, 2021, the Company had zero debt outstanding under the Credit Facility for both periods and was in compliance with all debt covenants. As of March 31,September 30, 2022, and December 31, 2021, letters of credit in the aggregate outstanding principal amount of $4.0 million and $4.0 million, respectively, were outstanding under the Credit Facility.
Subsequent to the end of the quarter, on November 4, 2022, the Company agreed with its Lender to terminate the Credit Agreement and the remaining Revolving Loan. The Lender has agreed to allow the Company’s existing letters of credit to remain outstanding provided that they are cash collateralized.
Contractual Obligations
Current portion of Long-Term Debt, Long-Term Debt and Lease Commitments. As of March 31,September 30, 2022, we have no debt outstanding. We lease offices, educational facilities and various items of equipment for varying periods through the year 2041 at basic annual rentals (excluding taxes, insurance, and other expenses under certain leases).
As of March 31,September 30, 2022, we had outstanding loan principal commitments to our active students of $30.1$31.4 million. These are institutional loans and no cash is advanced to students. The full loan amount is not guaranteed unless the student completes the program. The institutional loans are considered commitments because the students are packagedrequired to fund their education using these funds and they are not reported on our financial statements.
Regulatory Updates
Gainful Employment.Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations.
The DOE commenced a negotiated rulemaking process in January 2022 that concluded in March 2022 in which it proposedDOE’s current Borrower Defense to Repayment regulations establish new gainful employment requirements that would be applicableprocesses for borrowers to all of our educational programs. The DOE previously issued gainful employment regulations in October 2014 that subsequently were rescinded effective July 1, 2020, althoughreceive from the DOE provided institutions witha discharge of the opportunityobligation to implementrepay certain Title IV Program loans based on certain acts or omissions by the newinstitution or a covered party. The current regulations early.also establish processes for the DOE to seek recovery from the institution of the amount of discharged loans. The regulations also have addressed other related topics including, for example, modifying certain components of the financial responsibility regulations. See Form 10-K at Part I, Item I of our Form 10-K at “Regulatory1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Gainful Employment.Borrower Defense to Repayment Regulations” and “Business - Regulatory Environment – Financial Responsibility Standards.”
TheOn November 1, 2022, the DOE is expected to publish proposed gainful employment regulations for public comment and to publishpublished final regulations later this yearon borrower defense to repayment and other topics with a general effective date of July 1, 2023. The final regulations regarding borrower defense to repayment and regarding closed school loan discharges are extensive and generally make it easier for borrowers to obtain discharges of student loans and for the DOE to assess liabilities and other sanctions on institutions based on the loan discharges.
Among other things, the final borrower defense to repayment regulations establish a new process and standard for evaluating borrower applications for loan discharges that would take effectapply to all claims submitted or pending as of the anticipated July 1, 2023 effective date of the regulations. The new process and standard differ from the prior regulations that establish a separate process and standard for each of 3 categories of loans depending on the date the loans were disbursed to students (i.e., prior to July 1, 2017, between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2020, and on or after July 1, 2020). As a result, the new process and standard will apply not only to loans disbursed on or after July 1, 2023, but we cannot predictalso to older loans as long as the precise timing, effectivedischarge requests are still pending as of July 1, 2023 or are submitted on or after July 1, 2023.
The final DOE regulations continue to permit the imposition of liabilities on institutions for the amount of discharged loans. For loans disbursed prior to July 1, 2023, the DOE indicated that it will not use the same standard for determining institutional liabilities under the new regulations as it will use for determining whether to discharge the loans. Instead, the DOE indicated that it will seek recoupment from an institution for such loans only if they would have been discharged under the standards used under current regulations based on the date the loans were disbursed to students. However, the new regulations will make it easier for the DOE to recover from the institution the liabilities that the DOE elects to impose.
The new regulations also expand the types of conduct that could result in a discharge of student loans including: 1) an expanded list of substantial misrepresentations; 2) a new section regarding substantial omissions of fact; 3) breaches of contract; 4) a new section regarding aggressive and deceptive recruitment; or content5) state or federal judgments or final DOE actions that could result in a borrower defense claim. Some of these forms of conduct also could result in other sanctions against the institutions. See Form 10-K at Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Substantial Misrepresentation.” The new regulations also make it easier for borrowers to qualify for loan discharges by enabling the DOE to permit group consideration of borrower claims under certain circumstances either on its own initiative or at the request of state requestors or certain third-party legal assistance organizations (which could enable the DOE to evaluate and rule on a broad group of claims more quickly than evaluating the claims individually), establishing a rebuttable presumption that borrowers in a group claim reasonably relied on (and were impacted by) acts or omissions giving rise to a borrower defense, establishing a borrower defense to repayment claim based on a separate state law standard if the DOE does not approve claims based on one of the gainful employment regulations that are expectedother types of conduct for borrowers with loans first disbursed prior to emerge from this process. Further, we also cannot predictJuly 1, 2017, and providing the extentDOE with the discretion to which our programs may be adversely impacted by the tests that might be established by the gainful employment regulations.reopen its decisions at any time in accordance with regulatory requirements.
The new regulations also reinstitute a general prohibition on institutions requiring borrowers to agree to mandatory pre-dispute arbitration agreements and requiring students to waive the ability to participate in a class-action lawsuit with respect to a borrower defense claim. The new regulations also require institutions to disclose publicly and notify the DOE of judicial and arbitration filings and awards pertaining to borrower defense claims. The new regulations also include provisions on other topics including public service loan forgiveness, eliminating capitalization on student loans in some cases, total and permanent disability discharges, and closed school loan discharges (see “Closed School Loan Discharges”), and false certification discharges (e.g., when an institution falsely certifies an ineligible student’s eligibility for loans).
We are in the process of evaluating the impact of these new and complex regulations on our business and the changes from the proposed regulations, but the final regulations impose new requirements and processes that will make it easier for borrowers to obtain discharges of their loans and for the DOE to recover liabilities from institutions and impose other sanctions. The implementation of new gainful employmentborrower defense to repayment regulations by the DOE and the enforcement of the existing borrower defense to repayment regulations could amonghave a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. See Form 10-K at Part I, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Negotiated Rulemaking.”
In April 2021, the Company received communication from the DOE indicating that the DOE was in receipt of a number of borrower defense applications containing allegations concerning our schools and requiring the DOE to undertake a fact-finding process pursuant to DOE regulations. Among other things, (i) requirethe communication outlines a process by which the DOE would provide to us the applications and allow us the opportunity to eliminate or modifysubmit responses to them. Further, the communication outlines certain information requests, relating to the period between 2007 and 2013, in connection with the DOE’s preliminary review of the borrower defense applications. Based upon publicly available information, it appears that the DOE has undertaken similar reviews of other educational programs, (ii) resultinstitutions which have also been the subject of various borrower defense applications. We have received the borrower application claims and have completed the process of thoroughly reviewing and responding to each borrower application as well as providing information in response to the DOE’s requests.
Given the early stage of this matter, management is not able to predict the outcome of the DOE’s review at this time. If the DOE disagrees with our legal and factual grounds for contesting the applications, the DOE may impose liabilities on the Company based on the discharge of the loans at issue in the loss of our students’ access to Title IV Program funds for the affected programs, and (iii)pending applications which could have a significant impact on the rate at which students enroll in our programs andmaterial adverse effect on our business and results of operations. If any or all of the borrower defense to repayment applications remain pending by the time the new borrower defense to repayment regulations generally take effect on July 1, 2023, the DOE could attempt to apply the new regulations to the pending applications which could increase the likelihood of the DOE granting the applications because the proposed regulations are more favorable to borrowers.
In August 2022, the Company received communication from the DOE regarding a single borrower defense application submitted on behalf of a group of students who were enrolled in a single educational program at two of our programsschools in Massachusetts between 2010 and 2013. The communication, which did not state who submitted the application or when it was submitted, asked us to submit a response within 60 calendar days. We timely responded to the DOE’s letter, notwithstanding the absence of a response to our request for additional information about the student claims. We are adversely impacted or we must eliminate or modify certain programs orwaiting for the DOE’s reply to our students lose accessresponse and to Title IV Program funds thereour request for information about the student claims. Given the early stage of this matter, management is not able to predict the outcome of the DOE’s review at this time. If the DOE disagrees with our legal and factual grounds for contesting the application, the DOE may impose liabilities on the Company based on the discharge of the loans at issue in the pending application, which could behave a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
It is possible that we may receive from the DOE in the future borrower defense applications submitted by or on behalf of prior, current, or future students and that the DOE could seek to recover liabilities from us for discharged loans. If the DOE grants any pending or future borrower applications, the DOE regulations state that the DOE may initiate an appropriate proceeding to recover liabilities arising from the loans in the applications. If the DOE initiates such a proceeding, we would request reconsideration of the liabilities. We cannot predict the timing or amount of all borrower defense applications that borrowers may submit to the DOE or that the DOE may grant in the future, or the timing or amount of any possible liabilities that the DOE may seek to recover from the Company, if any.
On June 22, 2022, the plaintiffs in a lawsuit against the DOE before a federal court in California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) and the DOE submitted a proposed settlement agreement to the court. The plaintiffs in the suit contend, among other things, that the DOE has failed to timely decide and resolve borrower defense to repayment applications submitted to the DOE. If approved, the settlement would result in full discharge and refund payments to covered student borrowers who have asserted a borrower defense to repayment to the DOE and whose borrower defense claims have not yet been granted or denied on the merits.
The lawsuit is a class action filed against the DOE in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California by a group of students, none of whom attended any of our institutions. We were not a party to the lawsuit when it was filed. The plaintiffs requested the court to compel the DOE to start approving or denying the pending applications. The court granted class certification and defined the class of plaintiffs generally to include all people who borrowed a Title IV Direct loan or FFEL loan, who have asserted a borrower defense to repayment claim to the DOE, and whose borrower defense claim has not been granted or denied on the merits. We have not received notice or confirmation directly from the DOE of the total number of student borrowers who have submitted borrower defense to repayment claims related to our institutions.
The proposed settlement agreement sets forth a long list of institutions, including Lincoln Technical Institute and Lincoln College of Technology, and, under the proposed settlement, the DOE would agree to discharge loans and refund all prior loan payments to each class member with loan debt associated with an institution on the list (which includes our institutions), including borrowers whose applications the DOE previously denied after October 30, 2019. The DOE and the plaintiffs stated in a court filing that this provision is intended to provide for automatic relief for students at the listed schools, which they estimate to total 200,000 class members. We anticipate that the DOE believes that the class includes the borrowers with claims to which we have submitted responses to the DOE although it is possible that the class also includes borrowers with claims for which we have not received notice from the DOE or an opportunity to respond. The parties also stated that the DOE has determined that attendance at one of the institutions on the list justifies presumptive relief based on strong indicia regarding substantial misconduct by the institutions, whether credibly alleged or in some instances proven, and the high rate of class members with applications related to the listed schools. The proposed settlement agreement provides a separate process for reviewing claims associated with schools not on the list. It is unclear whether the DOE would seek to impose liabilities on us or other schools or take other actions or impose other sanctions on us or other schools based on relief provided to students under the proposed settlement agreement (particularly if the DOE provides relief without evaluating or accounting for legal and factual information provided to the DOE by us and other schools or without providing us and other schools with notice and an opportunity to respond to some of the claims).
In July 2022, we and certain other school companies submitted motions to intervene in the lawsuit in order to protect our interests in the finalization and implementation of any settlement agreement the court might approve. We noted in the motion that the proposed settlement agreement introduced, for the first time, the prospect that the DOE would “automatically” and fully discharge loans and refund payments to student borrowers without adjudication of the merits of the students’ borrower-defense applications in accordance with the DOE’s borrower-defense regulations and without ensuring that we and other institutions can defend against allegations asserted in individual borrower-defense applications. In addition, we also asserted that it would be unlawful and inappropriate if the DOE sought recoupment against us based on loans that were forgiven under the proposed settlement agreement without providing us an opportunity to address the claims or accounting for our responses to the claims already submitted which we believe is required by the regulations. We also asserted that the lawsuit and the potential loan discharges could result in reputational harm to us and our institutions and could result in other actions against us by other federal and state agencies or by current and former students.
The court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement agreement on August 4, 2022, and also granted our motion for permissive intervention for the purpose of objecting to and opposing the class action settlement. On September 22, 2022, the DOE and the plaintiffs filed a joint motion for final approval of the settlement. In that joint motion, the DOE and plaintiffs reported that approximately 179,000 new borrower defense applications had been submitted to the DOE as of September 20, 2022. We and the three other intervenor schools filed briefs opposing final approval. The court has scheduled a final approval hearing for November 9, 2022, and we intend to participate in the hearing and present arguments. We cannot predict whether the court will grant or deny final approval of the proposed settlement agreement, or whether the DOE and plaintiffs will make amendments to the proposed settlement agreement. If the proposed settlement agreement, as it is currently drafted, receives final approval by the court, the DOE is expected to automatically approve all of the pending borrower defense applications concerning our schools that were submitted to the DOE on or before June 22, 2022 and to provide such automatic approval without evaluating or accounting for any of the legal or factual grounds that we provided for contesting the applications that were provided to us. The DOE may or may not seek recoupment from the schools relating to the automatic approval of borrower defense applications. If the DOE approves borrower defense applications concerning us and attempts to recoup from us the loan amounts in the approved applications, we would consider options for challenging the legal and factual basis for attempting to recoup these liabilities. The settlement agreement also requires the DOE to review borrower defense applications submitted after June 22, 2022 and by the date of the final approval of the agreement within 3 years under procedures described in the agreement. If the DOE grants some or all of these applications, the DOE also could attempt to recoup the loan amounts in these applications from our schools. We cannot predict whether the currently proposed settlement will be approved, what actions the DOE might take if the proposed settlement is approved (including the ultimate timing or amount of borrower defense applications that the DOE may grant in the future and the timing or amount of any possible liabilities that the DOE may seek to recover from the Company, if any), or what the outcome of any challenges we might make to such actions will be, but such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
The “90/10 Rule.”
Under the Higher Education Act, a proprietary institution that derives more than 90% of its total revenue from Title IV Programs (its “90/10 Rule percentage”) for two consecutive fiscal years becomes immediately ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs and may not reapply for eligibility until the end of at least two fiscal years. See Form 10-K at Part I, Item I of our Form 10-K at1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – The 90/10.10 Rule.” An institution with revenues exceeding 90% for a single fiscal year will be placed on provisional certification and may be subject to other enforcement measures, including a potential requirement to submit a letter of credit. See Form 10-K at Part I, Item I of our Form 10-K at1. “Business - Regulatory Environment – Financial Responsibility Standards.” If an institution violated the 90/10 Rule and became ineligible to participate in Title IV Programs but continued to disburse Title IV Program funds, the DOE would require the institution to repay all Title IV Program funds received by the institution after the effective date of the loss of eligibility.
In March 2021, the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (“ARPA”) was signed into law. Among other provisions, the ARPA includes a provision that amends the 90/10 rule by treating other “Federal funds that are disbursed or delivered to or on behalf of a student to be used to attend such institution” in the same way as Title IV Program funds are currently treated in the 90/10 rule calculation. This means that our institutions will be required to limit the combined amount of Title IV Program funds and applicable “Federal funds” revenue in a fiscal year to no more than 90% as calculated under the rule. Consequently, the ARPA change to the 90/10 rule is expected to increase the 90/10 rule calculations at our institutions. The ARPA does not identify the specific Federal funding programs that will be covered by this provision, but it is expected to include funding from federal student aid programs such as the veterans’ benefits programs, which include the Post-9/11 GI Bill and Veterans Readiness and Employment services from which we derived approximately 7% of our revenues on a cash basis in 2021.
The ARPA states that the amendments to the 90/10 rule apply to institutional fiscal years beginning on or after January 1, 2023 and are subject to the HEA’s negotiated rulemaking process. Accordingly, the ARPA change to the 90/10 rule is not expected to apply to our 90/10 rule calculations until 2024 relating to our fiscal year ended 2023. Beginning in January 2022, the DOE convened negotiated rulemaking committee meetings on a variety of topics including the 90/10 rule. The committee reached consensus on proposed 90/10 rule regulations during meetings in March 2022. The
On July 28, 2022, the DOE is expected to publish the consensus version of thepublished proposed regulations with potential technical edits in the next few weeks or months.
The consensus version ofregarding the 90/10 rule among other topics. See Form 10-K at Part I, Item 1. at “Business – Regulatory Environment - Negotiated Rulemaking.” The proposed 90/10 rule regulations containscontain several new and amended provisions on a variety of topics including, among other things, confirming that the rules apply to fiscal years ending on or after January 1, 2023; noting that the DOE plans to identify the types of Federal funds to be included in the 90/10 rule in a notice in the Federal Register (which we anticipate will include a wide range of Federal student aid programs such as the veterans’ benefits programs):; requiring institutions to disburse funds that students are eligible to receive for a fiscal year before the end of the fiscal year rather than delaying disbursements until a subsequent fiscal year; updating requirements for counting revenues generated from certain educational activities associated with institutional programs, from certain non-Title IV eligible educational programs, and from institutional aid programs such as institutional loans, scholarships, and income share agreements; updating technical rules for the 90/10 rule calculation; and including rules for sanctions for noncompliance with the 90/10 rule and for required notifications to students and the DOE by the institution of noncompliance with the 90/10 rule.
The DOE published final regulations on October 28, 2022 with a general effective date of July 1, 2023. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of these new regulations on our business and any changes from the proposed regulations, typically are subject to a notice and comment period before the DOE publishes final regulations after consideration of public comment. We cannot predict the ultimate timing and content ofbut the final regulations buton the future regulations on 90/10 rule could have a material adverse effect on us and other schools like ours.
Substantial Misrepresentation.37
School Acquisitions.
The DOE’s regulations prohibit an institutionWhen a company acquires a school that participatesis eligible to participate in Title IV Programs, from engagingthat school undergoes a change of ownership resulting in substantial misrepresentationa change of the nature of its educational programs, financial charges, graduate employability or its relationship withcontrol as defined by the DOE. The DOE has initiatedUpon such a negotiated rulemaking process that may result in, among other things, an expansionchange of the categories of conduct deemed to becontrol, a misrepresentation and that also may result in new prohibitions on certain types of recruiting tactics and conduct that the DOE deems to be aggressive or deceptive. See Part I, Item I of our Form 10-K at “Regulatory Environment – Substantial Misrepresentation.”
In March 2022, the DOE published guidance about the enforcement of the requirements regarding substantial misrepresentations. The DOE indicated that it is monitoring complaints and borrower defense to repayment applications from veterans, servicemembers, and their family members who report that personnel and representatives of postsecondary schools suggested during the enrollment process that their military education benefits would cover all of the costs of their program but were told subsequently they would have to take out student loans to finish the program. The DOE stated that it would ensure that institutions engaging in misrepresentations are held accountable if they cause a student to incur extra costs unwittingly or without a full understanding of the implications of borrowing. The DOE also indicated that such students could be entitled to discharge of their student loans and that it would share information and complaints about military-connected students with the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs for potential agency action. In the event of any DOE determination that an institution may have engaged in substantial misrepresentation could result in the imposition of sanctions or other restrictions upon the institution including, but not limited to fines, limitations, suspension or termination ofschool’s eligibility to participate in Title IV Programs is generally suspended until it has applied for recertification by the DOE as an eligible school under its new ownership, which requires that the school also re-establish its state authorization and discharge of students’ loans.accreditation. See Form 10-K at Part I, Item I of our Form 10-K at1. “Business -– Regulatory Environment – Borrower Defense To Repayment Regulations.School Acquisitions.”
Federal Trade Commission.
On October 6, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued an announcement regarding its plan Thus, any plans to target false claims by for-profit colleges on topics such as promises about graduates’ employmentexpand our business through acquisition of additional schools and earnings prospects and other outcomes and its intentions to impose “significant financial penalties” on violators and to monitor the market carefully with federal and state partners. The FTC indicated in the announcement that it had put 70 for-profit higher education institutions on notice that the agency would be “cracking down” on any such false promises. All of our institutions were among the 70 institutions who received this notice. Although the FTC stated that a school’s presence on the list of 70 institutions does not reflect any assessment as to whether they have allegedly engaged in deceptive or unfair conduct, the FTC’s announcement and its issuance of notices to schools could lead to further scrutiny, investigations and potential enforcement actionsthem certified by the FTC and other regulators against for-profit schools, including our schools. See Part I, Item I of our Form10-K at “Regulatory Environment – ScrutinyDOE to participate in Title IV Programs must take into account the approval requirements of the For-Profit Education Sector.”
In March 2022,DOE and the FTC published an Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register announcing its consideration of potential rulemaking on the subject of false, misleading,relevant state education agencies and unsubstantiated earnings claims by various entities including for-profit colleges. The FTC stated that, if finalized, a rule in this area would allow the FTC to recover redress for impacted consumers and to seek steep penalties against entities including for-profit colleges. The FTC is accepting public comments on the potential rulemaking until May 10, 2022 and stated that the next step would be to issue a notice of proposed rulemaking if it determines to proceed with proposing regulations on this topic. We cannot predict whether and to what extent the FTC will establish new regulations, nor can we predict the timing or potential impact of these regulations.
Other Financial Assistance Programs
We are required to comply with applicable federal and state laws related to certain consumer and educational loans and credit extensions. See Part I, Item I of our Form 10-K at “Regulatory Environment – Other Financial Assistance Programs.” In Marchaccrediting commissions. On July 28, 2022, the DOE published guidance remindingproposed regulations on topics including changes in ownership. The DOE published final regulations on October 28, 2022 with a general effective date of July 1, 2023. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of these new regulations on our business, but the regulations, among other things, expand the requirements applicable to school acquisitions in ways that could make it more difficult to acquire additional schools. See Form 10-K at Part I, Item 1. at “Business – Regulatory Environment - Negotiated Rulemaking.”
Change of Control.
In addition to school acquisitions, other types of transactions can also cause a change of control. The DOE, most state education agencies and our accrediting commissions have standards pertaining to the change of control of schools, but these standards are not uniform. See Form 10-K at Part 1, Item 1. “Business – Regulatory Environment – Change of Control.” A change of control could occur as a result of future transactions in which the Company or our schools are involved. Some corporate reorganizations and some changes in the board of directors of the Company are examples of such transactions. Moreover, the potential adverse effects of a change of control could influence future decisions by us and our shareholders regarding the sale, purchase, transfer, issuance or redemption of our stock. In addition, the adverse regulatory effect of a change of control also could discourage bids for shares of our common stock and could have an adverse effect on the market price of our shares. On July 28, 2022, the DOE published proposed regulations on topics including regulations associated with the ownership and control of Title IV participating schools. The DOE published final regulations on October 28, 2022 with a general effective date of general effective date, July 1, 2023. We are in the process of evaluating the impact of these new regulations, but the regulations, among other things, could further influence future decisions by us or by current or prospective shareholders regarding the sale, purchase, transfer, issuance or redemption of our stock, or that could impact our ability or willingness to make certain organizational changes. See Form 10-K at Part I, Item 1. at “Business – Regulatory Environment - Negotiated Rulemaking.”
State Legislation.
On June 19, 2022, the New Jersey Legislature passed a bill that was signed into law by the Governor of New Jersey on July 29, 2022 that will require the New Jersey Office of the Secretary of Higher Education (“NJOSHE”) and New Jersey Department of Labor and Workforce Development (“NJDLWD”) to adopt regulations establishing a performance quality standard for career-oriented programs of study offered by institutions of higher education of their legal obligations when recommending, promoting or endorsingand proprietary degree-granting institutions, as well as all programs at private education loans including disclosure, consumer protection,career schools in New Jersey. Our six schools in New Jersey currently operate as private career schools and reporting requirements. The issuancewill be subject to the new regulations.
In establishing the standard, the NJOSHE and NJDLWD must consider the ratio of the guidance may leadtuition and fees charged to increased enforcement activitystudents, net of any institutional grant aid, to the average earnings of New Jersey workers employed in the specific occupation for which the career-oriented program prepares students. In addition, the NJOSHE and NJDLWD must ensure that career-oriented programs of study offered by institutions of higher education and degree-granting proprietary institutions, as well as all programs at private career schools meet a minimum acceptable level of performance. The law also requires the NJOSHE and NJDLWD to take action on a program that does not meet the minimum acceptable level of performance, including suspending or terminating that program, as well as possibly taking additional action to suspend or revoke the license of the institution of higher education, proprietary degree-granting institution or private career school to award postsecondary credentials.
Neither the NJOSHE, nor NJDLWD, has officially initiated the rulemaking process that must be conducted in accordance with respect to requirements related to private education loans. ToNew Jersey’s Administrative Procedures Act. We are in the extent that these requirements apply to our institutions, our failure to comply with these requirements could result in enforcement actions that could have a material adverseprocess of evaluating the potential impact of this new law on our operations.business and will be monitoring the future rulemaking process.
Seasonality
Our revenue and operating results normally fluctuate as a result of seasonal variations in our business, principally due to changes in total student population. Student population varies as a result ofdue to new student enrollments, graduations and student attrition. Historically, our schools have had lower student populations in our first and second quarters and we have experienced larger class starts in the third quarter and higher student attrition in the first half of the year. OurThe growth that we generally experience in the second half growthof the year is largely dependent on a successful high school recruiting season. We recruit high school students several months ahead of their scheduled start dates and, thus,as a consequence, while we have visibility on the number of students who have expressed interest in attending our schools, we cannot predict with certainty the actual number of new student enrollments in any given year and the related impact on revenue. Our expenses, however, typically do not vary significantly over the course of the year with changes in our student population and revenue.
| Item 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information otherwise required by this item.
| Item 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
(a) Evaluation of disclosure controlsDisclosure Controls and procedures.Procedures. Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e)) as of the end of the quarterly period covered by this report, have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are adequate and effective to reasonably ensure that material information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes made during our most recently completed fiscal quarter in our internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART
II.II. OTHER INFORMATION
On June 22, 2022, the DOE and plaintiffs in a lawsuit before a federal court in California submitted a proposed settlement agreement to the court. The plaintiffs contend, among other things, that the DOE has failed to timely decide and resolve borrower defense to repayment applications submitted to the DOE. If approved, the settlement would result in full discharge and refund payments to covered student borrowers who have asserted a borrower defense to repayment to the DOE and whose borrower defense claims have not yet been granted or denied on the merits.
The lawsuit (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)) is a class action filed against the DOE in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California submitted by a group of students, none of whom attended any of our institutions. We were not a party to the lawsuit when it was filed. The plaintiffs requested the court to compel the DOE to start approving or denying the pending applications. The court granted class certification and defined the class of plaintiffs generally to include all people who borrowed a Title IV Direct loan or FFEL loan, who have asserted a borrower defense to repayment claim to the DOE, and whose borrower defense claim has not been granted or denied on the merits. We have not received notice or confirmation directly from the DOE of the number of student borrowers who have submitted borrower defense to repayment claims related to our institutions.
The proposed settlement agreement includes a long list of institutions, including Lincoln Technical Institute and Lincoln College of Technology, and, under the proposed settlement, the DOE would agree to discharge loans and refund all prior loan payments to each class member with loan debt associated with an institution on the list (which includes our institutions), including borrowers whose applications the DOE previously denied after October 30, 2019. The DOE and the plaintiffs stated in a court filing that this provision is intended to provide for automatic relief for students at the listed schools, which they estimate to total 200,000 class members. We anticipate that the DOE believes that the class includes the borrowers with claims to which we have submitted responses to the DOE although it is possible that the class also includes borrowers with claims for which we have not received notice from the DOE or an opportunity to respond. The parties also stated that the DOE has determined that attendance at one of the institutions on the list justifies presumptive relief based on strong indicia regarding substantial misconduct by the institutions, whether credibly alleged or in some instances proven, and the high rate of class members with applications related to the listed schools. The proposed settlement agreement provides a separate process for reviewing claims associated with schools not on the list. It is unclear whether the DOE would seek to impose liabilities on us or other schools or take other actions or impose other sanctions on us or other schools based on relief provided to students under the proposed settlement agreement (particularly if the DOE provides relief without evaluating or accounting for legal and factual information provided to the DOE by us and other schools or without providing us and other schools with notice and an opportunity to respond to some of the claims).
In July 2022, the Company and certain other school companies submitted motions to intervene in the lawsuit in order to protect our interests in the finalization and implementation of any settlement agreement the court might approve. We noted in the motion that the proposed settlement agreement introduced, for the first time, the prospect that the DOE would “automatically” and fully discharge loans and refund payments to student borrowers without adjudication of the merits of the students’ borrower-defense applications in accordance with the DOE’s borrower-defense regulations and without ensuring that we and other institutions can defend against allegations asserted in individual borrower-defense applications. In addition, we also asserted that it would be unlawful and inappropriate if the DOE sought recoupment against us based on loans that were forgiven under the proposed settlement agreement without providing us an opportunity to address the claims or accounting for our responses to the claims already submitted which we believe is required by the regulations. We also asserted that the lawsuit and the potential loan discharges could result in reputational harm to us and our institutions and could result in other actions against us by other federal and state agencies or by current and former students.
The court granted preliminary approval of the proposed settlement agreement on August 4, 2022, and also granted our motion for permissive intervention for the purpose of objecting to and opposing the class action settlement. On September 22, 2022, the DOE and the plaintiffs filed a joint motion for final approval of the settlement. In that joint motion, the DOE and plaintiffs reported that approximately 179,000 new borrower defense applications had been submitted to the DOE as of September 20, 2022. We and the three other intervenor schools filed briefs opposing final approval. The court has scheduled a final approval hearing for November 9, 2022, and we intend to participate in the hearing and present arguments. We cannot predict whether the court will grant or deny final approval of the proposed settlement agreement, or whether the DOE and plaintiffs will make amendments to the proposed settlement agreement. If the proposed settlement agreement, as it is currently drafted, receives final approval by the court, the DOE is expected to automatically approve all of the pending borrower defense applications concerning us that were submitted to the DOE on or before June 22, 2022 and to provide such automatic approval without evaluating or accounting for any of the legal or factual grounds that we provided for contesting the applications that were provided to us. The DOE may or may not seek recoupment from the schools relating to approval of borrower defense applications concerning us. If the DOE approves borrower defense applications concerning us and attempts to recoup from us the loan amounts in the approved applications, we would consider options for challenging the legal and factual basis for attempting to recoup these liabilities. The settlement agreement also requires the DOE to review borrower defense applications submitted after June 22, 2022 and by the date of the final approval of the agreement within 3 years under procedures described in the agreement. If the DOE grants some or all of these applications, the DOE also could attempt to recoup from us the loan amounts in these applications. We cannot predict whether the currently proposed settlement will be approved, what actions the DOE might take if the proposed settlement is approved (including the ultimate timing or amount of borrower defense applications the DOE may grant in the future and the timing or amount of any possible liabilities that the DOE may seek to recover from the Company, if any), or what the outcome of any challenges we might make to such actions will be, but such actions could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
In the ordinary conduct of our business, we are subject to periodic lawsuits, investigations, and claims, including, but not limited to, claims involving students or graduates and routine employment matters. Although we cannot predict with certainty the ultimate resolution of lawsuits, investigations, and claims asserted against us, we do not believe that any currently pending legal proceeding to which we are a party will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
In December 2021, we received a letter from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) stating that the CFPB is assessing whether we are subject to CFPB’s supervisory authority based on our activities related to certain extensions of credit to our students and requesting certain information. The letter states that the CFPB has the authority to supervise certain entities in the private education loan market and certain other consumer financial products and services. We have provided the requested information to the CFPB and are waiting for the CFPB to respond.
In a class action before the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Sweet v. Cardona, No. 3:19-cv-3674 (N.D. Cal.)), a settlement is under consideration which could result in the automatic approval of all pending borrower defense applications submitted to the DOE on or before June 22, 2022 concerning our institutions and, if approval were to occur, the DOE could elect to seek recoupment from us of all loan amounts in the approved applications.
On June 22, 2022, the DOE and plaintiffs in a class action lawsuit before a federal court in California submitted a proposed settlement agreement to the court. The plaintiff class is not limited to students who attended our schools and generally includes all people who borrowed a Title IV Direct loan or FFEL loan, who have asserted a borrower defense to repayment claim to the DOE, and whose borrower defense claim has not been granted or denied on the merits. The court is scheduled to consider the settlement agreement at a hearing on November 9, 2022. If the court grants final approval of the settlement agreement, the DOE is expected to automatically approve all of the pending borrower defense applications submitted to the DOE concerning us on or before June 22, 2022 and to provide such automatic approval without evaluating or accounting for any of the legal or factual grounds that we provided for contesting the applications that were provided to us and without providing notice and opportunity to respond to applications that were not provided to us. The automatic approval of the applications would result in the full discharge of the borrowers’ loans and the refund of payments made on the loans by the borrowers. We have not received notice or confirmation directly from the DOE of the number of student borrowers who have submitted borrower defense to repayment claims related to our institutions.
The Company has no changesDOE could elect to seek to recoup from us the Risk Factors disclosedloan amounts in the approved applications and to take other actions or impose other sanctions on us based on the cost of providing relief to students under the proposed settlement agreement. If the DOE approves borrower defense applications concerning us and attempts to recoup from us the loan amounts in the approved applications, we would consider options for challenging the legal and factual basis for attempting to recoup these liabilities. The settlement agreement also requires the DOE to review borrower defense applications submitted after June 22, 2022, and by the date of the final approval of the agreement within 3 years under procedures described in the agreement. If the DOE grants some or all of these applications, the DOE also could attempt to recoup from us the loan amounts in these applications.
We cannot predict whether the currently proposed settlement will be approved, what actions the DOE might take if the proposed settlement is approved (including the ultimate timing or amount of borrower defense applications the DOE may grant in the future and the timing or amount of any possible liabilities that the DOE may seek to recover from us, if any), or what the outcome of any challenges we might make to such actions will be, but such actions could have a material adverse effect on our Form 10-K to report.business and results of operations. For more information, see “Part II. Item 1 – Legal Proceedings.”
| Item 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS |
| (c) | Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities. |
None.
On May 24, 2022, the Company announced that the Board of Directors had approved a share repurchase program for 12 months authorizing purchases of up to $30.0 million. The following table presents the number and average price of shares purchased during the three months ended September 30, 2022. The remaining authorized amount for share repurchases under the program is approximately $23.3 million.
| Period | | Total Number of Shares Purchased | | | Average Price Paid per Share | | | Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publically Announced Plan | | | Maximum Dollar Value of Shares Remaining to be Purchased Under the Plan | |
| July 1, 2022 to July 31, 2022 | | | 104,519 | | | $ | 6.52 | | | | 104,519 | | | $ | 26,780,002 | |
| August 1, 2022 to August 31, 2022 | | | 260,833 | | | | 6.43 | | | | 260,833 | | | | 25,102,459 | |
| September 1, 2022 to September 30, 2022 | | | 303,088 | | | | 6.06 | | | | 303,088 | | | | 23,266,594 | |
| Total | | | 668,440 | | | | 6.28 | | | | 668,440 | | | | | |
For more information on the share repurchase plan, see Note 7 to our condensed consolidated financial statements.
| Item 3. | DEFAULTS ON SENIOR SECURITIES |
None.
| Item 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
None.
| (a) | On November 4, 2022, the Company terminated the Company’s existing Credit Agreement, dated as of November 14, 2019, as amended (the “Credit Agreement”), with its lender, Webster Bank, National Bank, as successor-by-merger to Sterling National Bank (the “Lender”). The Credit Agreement, as originally entered into, provided for various loans but, pursuant to certain amendments, had been modified such that only the Revolving Loan in the principal amount of $15.0 million remained in place. The Company was not in default under the Credit Agreement nor did it have any amounts outstanding thereunder other than standby letters of credit. The Credit Agreement would have matured on November 14, 2023. Upon the termination of the Credit Agreement, all security interests and pledges granted to the secured parties thereunder were terminated and released. Among the issues considered in the determination to terminate the Credit Agreement were the Company’s strong cash position, the elimination of certain fees associated with the Credit Agreement, including the .50% unused credit fee, as well as the elimination of affirmative and negative covenants. The Company’s standby letters of credit with the Lender in the aggregate amount of $4.0 million remain in place with the Lender provided that they are cash collateralized. |
None.
On November 3, 2022, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Severance and Retention Payment Policy.
Exhibit Number | Description |
| | |
| 3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Registration No. 333-123644) filed June 7, 2005. |
| | |
| 3.2 | Certificate of Amendment, dated November 14, 2019, to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed October 6, 2020). |
| | |
| 3.3 | Bylaws of the Company as amended on March 8, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 30, 2020). |
| | |
| 10.1* | Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Severance and Retention Policy. |
31.1* | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
31.2* | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
32** | Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
101* | The following financial statements from Lincoln Educational Services Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2021,2022, formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (“iXBRL”): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail. |
| | |
104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRLiXBRL and contained in Exhibit 101). |
| ** | Furnished herewith. This exhibit will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.
| | | LINCOLN EDUCATIONAL SERVICES CORPORATION |
| | | |
Date: May 9,November 7, 2022 | By: | /s/ Brian Meyers | |
| | | Brian Meyers |
| | | Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer |
Exhibit Index
| Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A (Registration No. 333-123644) filed June 7, 2005. |
| | |
| Certificate of Amendment, dated November 14, 2019, to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed October 6, 2020). |
| | |
| Bylaws of the Company, as amended on March 8, 2019 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed April 30, 2020). |
| |
| Lincoln Educational Services Corporation Severance and Retention Pay Policy. |
| | |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| |
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
| | |
101* | The following financial statements from Lincoln Educational Services Corporation’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2021,2022, formatted in Inline Extensible Business Reporting Language (“iXBRL”): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income, (iv) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (v) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and in detail. |
| | |
104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRLiXBRL and contained in Exhibit 101) |
| ** | Furnished herewith. This exhibit will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such exhibit shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. |
3545