UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020



☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission file Number: 000-32891

1^ST CONSTITUTION BANCORP

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)



New Jersey		22-3665653
(State of Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)



2650 Route 130	P.O. Box 634	Cranbury	New Jersey	08512
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)				(Zip Code)



(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)	(609)	655-4500

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, no par value	FCCY	NASDAQ Global Market

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☒
		Emerging growth company	☐
If an emerging growth company, indicated by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.			☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of ~~November 4, 2019,~~May 7, 2020, there were ~~8,682,401~~10,201,298 shares of the registrant’s common stock, no par value, outstanding.

1ST CONSTITUTION BANCORP

FORM 10-Q

INDEX



		Page

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1

	Consolidated Balance Sheets at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 (unaudited)	1

	Consolidated Statements of Income for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 ~~and September 30, 2018~~ (unaudited)	2

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 ~~and September 30, 2018~~ (unaudited)	3

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 ~~and September 30, 2018~~ (unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~Nine~~Three Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 ~~and September 30, 2018~~ (unaudited)	5

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	6

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	3435

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	5857

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	5958

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	6059

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	6059

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	60

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	6061



Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	6061

Item 5.	Other Information	6061

Item 6.	Exhibits	6162

SIGNATURES		6263

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

1^ST Constitution Bancorp

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)


	September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	8,576		$	4,983		$	8,762		$	2,547
Interest-earning deposits	12,180			11,861			3,277			12,295
Total cash and cash equivalents	20,756			16,844			12,039			14,842
Investment securities
Available for sale, at fair value	135,084			132,222			163,725			155,782
Held to maturity (fair value of $76,763 and $80,204 at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively)	74,909			79,572
Held to maturity (fair value of $91,138 and $78,223 at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively)							88,381			76,620
Total investment securities	209,993			211,794			252,106			232,402
Loans held for sale	6,738			3,020			11,755			5,927
Loans	1,025,031			883,164			1,217,807			1,216,028
Less: allowance for loan losses	(8,977		)	(8,402		)	(10,001		)	(9,271		)
Net loans	1,016,054			874,762			1,207,806			1,206,757
Premises and equipment, net	11,619			11,653			14,966			15,262
Right-of-use assets	15,080			—			17,550			17,957
Accrued interest receivable	3,652			3,860			4,843			4,945
Bank-owned life insurance	29,142			28,705			36,858			36,678
Other real estate owned	1,460			2,515			470			571
Goodwill and intangible assets	12,165			12,258			36,654			36,779
Other assets	15,906			12,422			15,822			14,142
Total assets	$	1,342,565		$	1,177,833		$	1,610,869		$	1,586,262
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
LIABILITIES
Deposits
Non-interest bearing	$	217,555		$	212,981		$	299,147		$	287,555
Interest bearing	805,504			737,691			998,885			989,807
Total deposits	1,023,059			950,672			1,298,032			1,277,362
Short-term borrowings	137,800			71,775			94,125			92,050
Redeemable subordinated debentures	18,557			18,557			18,557			18,557
Accrued interest payable	1,602			1,228			1,430			1,592
Lease liability	15,699			—			18,257			18,617
Accrued expenses and other liabilities	7,321			8,516			7,363			7,506
Total liabilities	1,204,038			1,050,748			1,437,764			1,415,684
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Preferred stock, no par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued	—			—			—			—
Common stock, no par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 8,715,699 and 8,639,276 shares issued and 8,682,401 and 8,605,978 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively	80,518			79,536
Common stock, no par value; 30,000,000 shares authorized; 10,240,624 and 10,224,974 shares issued and 10,201,298 and 10,191,676 shares outstanding as of March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively							110,254			109,964
Retained earnings	58,198			49,750			63,295			60,791
Treasury stock, 33,298 shares at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018	(368		)	(368		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	179			(1,833		)
Treasury stock, 39,326 and 33,298 shares at March 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively							(503		)	(368		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income							59			191
Total shareholders' equity	138,527			127,085			173,105			170,578
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	1,342,565		$	1,177,833		$	1,610,869		$	1,586,262

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1^ST Constitution Bancorp

Consolidated Statements of Income

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019			2018		2019		2018		2020		2019
INTEREST INCOME
Loans, including fees	$	13,316		$	12,193	$	38,342	$	33,078	$	14,805	$	12,157
Securities:
Taxable	1,130			1,060		3,615		2,915		1,056		1,270
Tax-exempt	393			494		1,256		1,518		438		441
Federal funds sold and short-term investments	35			36		129		208		89		47
Total interest income	14,874			13,783		43,342		37,719		16,388		13,915
INTEREST EXPENSE
Deposits	2,904			1,854		7,892		4,542		3,238		2,317
Borrowings	268			349		698		576		62		173
Redeemable subordinated debentures	185			184		575		508		152		198
Total interest expense	3,357			2,387		9,165		5,626		3,452		2,688
Net interest income	11,517			11,396		34,177		32,093		12,936		11,227
PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES	350			225		1,050		675		895		300
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	11,167			11,171		33,127		31,418		12,041		10,927
NON-INTEREST INCOME
Service charges on deposit accounts	165			173		490		476		213		166
Gain on sales of loans	1,351			1,292		3,556		3,425		1,470		1,045
Income on bank-owned life insurance	149			152		437		425		180		139
Gain from bargain purchase	—			—		—		184
Gain on sales of securities	16			—		16		12		8		—
Other income	525			537		1,743		1,560		585		516
Total non-interest income	2,206			2,154		6,242		6,082		2,456		1,866
NON-INTEREST EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits	5,231			4,900		15,472		14,714		6,169		4,963
Occupancy expense	972			907		2,984		2,604		1,170		1,021
Data processing expenses	379			331		1,072		1,009		446		348
FDIC insurance expense	(47		)	105		113		381		34		100
Other real estate owned expenses	52			73		134		75		17		48
Merger-related expense	302			—		575		2,141
Other operating expenses	1,546			1,578		4,746		4,866		1,957		1,614
Total non-interest expenses	8,435			7,894		25,096		25,790		9,793		8,094
Income before income taxes	4,938			5,431		14,273		11,710		4,704		4,699
INCOME TAXES	1,315			1,420		3,883		2,975		1,283		1,302
Net income	$	3,623		$	4,011	$	10,390	$	8,735	$	3,421	$	3,397
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic	$	0.42		$	0.48	$	1.20	$	1.05	$	0.34	$	0.39
Diluted	$	0.42		$	0.46	$	1.19	$	1.02	$	0.33	$	0.39
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING
Basic	8,666,251			8,392,631		8,641,684		8,282,889		10,200,836		8,624,088
Diluted	8,722,349			8,678,679		8,698,959		8,565,401		10,262,047		8,694,004

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1^ST Constitution Bancorp

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019

Net income	$	3,623		$	4,011		$	10,390		$	8,735		$	3,421		$	3,397
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available for sale	200			(513		)	2,631			(2,015		)
Unrealized holding (losses) gains on securities available for sale													(187		)	1,408
Tax effect	(48		)	126			(638		)	484			46			(337		)
Net of tax amount	152			(387		)	1,993			(1,531		)	(141		)	1,071

Reclassification adjustment for gains on securities available for sale⁽¹⁾	(16		)	—			(16		)	(12		)	(1		)	—
Tax effect ⁽²⁾	4			—			4			3			—			—
Net of tax amount	(12		)	—			(12		)	(9		)	(1		)	—

Reclassification adjustment for unrealized impairment loss on held to maturity security⁽³⁾	2			—			6			—			3			1
Tax effect	—			—			(1		)	—			(1		)	—
Net of tax amount	2			—			5			—			2			1

Pension liability	56			89			167			178			56			55
Tax effect	(18		)	(25		)	(49		)	(50		)	(17		)	(17		)
Net of tax amount	38			64			118			128			39			38

Reclassification adjustment for actuarial gains for unfunded pension liability(4)													(44		)	(44		)
Income ⁽⁴⁾	(44		)	(15		)	(132		)	(45		)
Tax effect ⁽²⁾	14			4			40			12			13			13
Net of tax amount	(30		)	(11		)	(92		)	(33		)	(31		)	(31		)

Total other comprehensive income (loss)	150			(334		)	2,012			(1,445		)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income													(132		)	1,079

Comprehensive income	$	3,773		$	3,677		$	12,402		$	7,290		$	3,289		$	4,476

⁽¹⁾Included in gain on sales of securities on the consolidated statements of income

⁽²⁾Included in income taxes on the consolidated statements of income

⁽³⁾ Included in investment securities held to maturity on the consolidated balance sheets

⁽⁴⁾ Included in salaries and employee benefits expense on the consolidated statements of income

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1^ST Constitution Bancorp

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

For the Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

Common
Stock Retained
Earnings Treasury
Stock Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss) Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Balance, July 1, 2018 $ 79,003
$ 43,560
$ (368 ) $ (1,847 ) $ 120,348
Net income —
4,011
—
—
4,011
Share-based compensation 253
—
—
—
253
Cash dividends ($0.06 per share) —
(504 ) —
—
(504 )
Other comprehensive loss —
—
—
(334 ) (334 )
Balance, September 30, 2018 $ 79,256
$ 47,067
$ (368 ) $ (2,181 ) $ 123,774

Balance, July 1, 2019 $ 80,190
$ 55,224
$ (368 ) $ 29
$ 135,075
Net income —
3,623
—
—
3,623
Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares (8,358 shares and 25,350 shares, respectively) 60
—
—
—
60
Share-based compensation 268
—
—
—
268
Cash dividends ($0.075 per share) —
(649 ) —
—
(649 )
Other comprehensive income —
—
—
150
150
Balance, September 30, 2019 $ 80,518
$ 58,198
$ (368 ) $ 179
$ 138,527

Common
Stock

Retained
Earnings

Treasury
Stock

Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)

Total
Shareholders’
Equity
Balance, January 1, 2018 $ 72,935
$ 39,822
$ (368 ) $ (736 ) $ 111,653
Net income —
8,735
—
—
8,735
Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares (9,307 shares and 62,150 shares, respectively) 67
—
—
—
67
Share-based compensation 759
—
—
—
759
Issuance of common stock (249,785 shares) 5,495
—
—
—
5,495
Cash dividends ($0.18 per share) —
(1,490 ) —
—
(1,490 )
Other comprehensive loss —
—
—
(1,445 ) (1,445 )
Balance, September 30, 2018 $ 79,256
$ 47,067
$ (368 ) $ (2,181 ) $ 123,774

Balance, January 1, 2019 $ 79,536
$ 49,750
$ (368 ) $ (1,833 ) $ 127,085
Net income —
10,390
—
—
10,390
Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares (24,277 shares and 53,931 shares, respectively) 149
—
—
—
149
Share-based compensation 833
—
—
—
833
Cash dividends ($0.225 per share) —
(1,942 ) —
—
(1,942 )
Other comprehensive income —
—
—
2,012
2,012
Balance, September 30, 2019 $ 80,518
$ 58,198
$ (368 ) $ 179
$ 138,527



	Common Stock		Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance, January 1, 2019	$	79,536	$	49,750		$	(368	)	$	(1,833	)	$	127,085
Net income	—		3,397			—			—			3,397
Exercise of stock options and issuance of restricted shares (5,364 shares and 14,000 shares, respectively)	23		—			—			—			23
Share-based compensation	269		—			—			—			269
Cash dividends ($0.075 per share)	—		(646		)	—			—			(646		)
Other comprehensive income	—		—			—			1,079			1,079
Balance, March 31, 2019	$	79,828	$	52,501		$	(368	)	$	(754	)	$	131,207

Balance, January 1, 2020	$	109,964	$	60,791		$	(368	)	$	191		$	170,578
Net income	—		3,421			—			—			3,421
Issuance of restricted shares (15,650 shares)	—		—			—			—			—
Share-based compensation	290		—			—			—			290
Cash dividends ($0.09 per share)	—		(917		)	—			—			(917		)
Treasury stock purchased (6,028 shares)	—		—			(135		)	—			(135		)
Other comprehensive loss	—		—			—			(132		)	(132		)
Balance, March 31, 2020	$	110,254	$	63,295		$	(503	)	$	59		$	173,105

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1^ST Constitution Bancorp

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

Nine Months Ended September 30,
2019 2018
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income $ 10,390
$ 8,735
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities-
Provision for loan losses 1,050
675
Depreciation and amortization 1,020
1,056
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities 425
435
Loan discount accretion (289 ) (235 )
Gain from bargain purchase —
(184 )
Gains on sales and calls of securities available for sale (16 ) (12 )
Gains on sales of other real estate owned (137 ) —
Gains on sales of loans held for sale (3,556 ) (3,425 )
Originations of loans held for sale (100,664 ) (85,285 )
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale 100,502
88,602
Increase in cash surrender value on bank–owned life insurance (437 ) (439 )
Loss on cash surrender value on bank-owned life insurance —
14
Share-based compensation expense 833
759
Decrease in deferred tax asset 1,146
—
Noncash rent and equipment expense 152
—
Decrease in accrued interest receivable 208
85
Increase in other assets (3,442 ) (499 )
Increase in accrued interest payable 374
123
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities (693 ) 1,816
Net cash provided by operating activities 6,866
12,221
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of securities:
Available for sale (28,472 ) (30,122 )
Held to maturity (9,101 ) (2,868 )
Proceeds from maturities and payments of securities:
Available for sale 27,988
13,282
Held to maturity 13,592
21,584
Proceeds from bank-owned life insurance benefits paid —
893
Net purchase of restricted stock (2,062 ) (3,756 )
Net increase in loans (142,053 ) (19,368 )
Capital expenditures (657 ) (535 )
Forfeitable deposit on other real estate owned —
175
Net cash paid for acquisition of NJCB —
(996 )
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned 1,192
—
Net cash used in investing activities (139,573 ) (21,711 )
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Exercise of stock options 149
67
Cash dividends paid to shareholders (1,942 ) (1,490 )
Net increase (decrease) in deposits 72,387
(67,552 )
Increase in short-term borrowings 66,025
78,975
Net cash provided by financing activities 136,619
10,000
Increase in cash and cash equivalents 3,912
510
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 16,844
18,754
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 20,756
$ 19,264
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for -
Interest $ 8,791
$ 5,503
Income taxes 4,528
3,226

Non-cash items:
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned —
1,460
Right-of-use assets 15,080
—
Lease liability 15,699
—

Acquisition of New Jersey Community Bank
Noncash assets acquired:
Investment securities available for sale $ 11,173
Loans 75,144
Premises and equipment, net 1,120
Bank-owned life insurance 3,972
Accrued interest receivable 259
Core deposit intangible asset 80
Other real estate owned 1,230
Other assets 1,601

$ 94,579
Liabilities assumed :
Deposits $ 87,223
Other liabilities 636

$ 87,859

Common stock issued as consideration $ 5,494



	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2020			2019
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net income	$	3,421		$	3,397
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities-
Provision for loan losses	895			300
Depreciation and amortization	542			340
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities	306			110
SBA loan discount accretion	(106		)	(92		)
Gains on sales and calls of securities available for sale	(1		)	—
Gains on sales and calls of securities held to maturity	(7		)	—
Gains on sales of loans held for sale	(1,470		)	(1,045		)
Originations of loans held for sale	(42,459		)	(22,467		)
Proceeds from sales of loans held for sale	38,101			25,363
Increase in cash surrender value on bank–owned life insurance	(180		)	(139		)
Share-based compensation expense	290			269
Increase in deferred tax asset	(41		)	—
Noncash rent and equipment expense	47			53
Decrease in accrued interest receivable	102			81
Increase in other assets	(626		)	(304		)
(Decrease) increase in accrued interest payable	(162		)	361
Decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities	(131		)	(1,084		)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(1,479		)	5,143
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchases of securities:
Available for sale	(18,416		)	(20,950		)
Held to maturity	(16,729		)	(2,739		)
Proceeds from calls, maturities and payments of securities:
Available for sale	10,051			7,280
Held to maturity	4,889			4,436
Net (purchase) sale of restricted stock	(1,038		)	2,238
Net (increase) decrease in loans	(1,838		)	8,924
Capital expenditures	(37		)	(200		)
Proceeds from sales of other real estate owned	101			—
Net cash used in investing activities	(23,017		)	(1,011		)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Exercise of stock options	—			23
Purchase of treasury shares	(135		)	—
Cash dividends paid to shareholders	(917		)	(646		)
Net increase in deposits	20,670			44,533
Increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings	2,075			(49,725		)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities	21,693			(5,815		)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(2,803		)	(1,683		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	14,842			16,844
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	12,039		$	15,161
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for -
Interest	$	3,614		$	2,327
Income taxes	101			2,192

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

1^ST Constitution Bancorp

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020

(Unaudited)

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include 1^ST Constitution Bancorp (the “Company”), its wholly-owned subsidiary, 1^ST Constitution Bank (the “Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, 1^ST Constitution Investment Company of New Jersey, Inc., FCB Assets Holdings, Inc.~~, 204 South Newman Street Corp. and 249 New York Avenue, LLC.~~ 1^ST Constitution Capital Trust II, a subsidiary of the Company, is not included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements, as it is a variable interest entity and the Company is not the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation and certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation. The accounting and reporting policies of the Company and its subsidiaries conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) and to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, filed with the SEC on March ~~15, 2019.~~16, 2020.

Goodwill

During the first quarter of 2020, management determined that a triggering event had occurred with respect to goodwill, which required a review of goodwill for impairment. Management completed its review of goodwill and concluded that it was more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill exceeded the carrying amount of goodwill at March 31, 2020. Accordingly, goodwill was not impaired at March 31, 2020.

In the opinion of the Company, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring accruals) that are necessary for a fair presentation of the operating results for the interim periods have been included. The results of operations for periods of less than a year are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.

The Company has evaluated events and transactions occurring subsequent to the balance sheet date of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 for items that should potentially be recognized or disclosed in these financial statements. The evaluation was conducted through the date these financial statements were issued.

COVID-19 Impact

The sudden emergence of the COVID-19 global pandemic has created widespread uncertainty, social and economic disruption, highly volatile financial markets and unprecedented increases in unemployment levels in a short period of time. Mandated business and school closures, restrictions on travel and social distancing have resulted in almost all businesses and employees being adversely impacted and a dramatic increase in unemployment levels in a short period of time. While the spread of COVID-19 and the restrictions implemented to contain its spread did not significantly impact the Company’s financial condition as of March 31, 2020, the businesses located in the Bank’s primary market areas of northern and central New Jersey, communities along the New Jersey shore, and the New York City metropolitan area, and their employees, have been adversely impacted. As a result of the recent emergence of the pandemic and the uncertainty, it is not possible to determine the overall impact of the pandemic on the Company’s business. To the extent that customers are not able to fulfill their contractual obligations to the Company, the Company’s business operations, asset valuations, financial condition, cash flows and results of operations could be materially adversely impacted. Material adverse impacts may include all or a combination of valuation impairments on our intangible assets, investments, loans, deferred tax assets, or other real estate owned ("OREO").

The future effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations and financial performance will depend on future developments related to the duration, extent and severity of the pandemic and the length of time that mandated business and school closures, restrictions on travel and social distancing remain in place. The Company’s operations rely on third-party vendors to process, record and monitor transactions. If any of these vendors are unable to provide these services, our ability to serve customers could be disrupted. The pandemic could negatively impact customers’ ability to conduct banking and other financial transactions. The Company’s operations could be adversely impacted if key personnel or a significant number of employees were unable to work due to illness or restrictions.

On March 27, 2020, the President of the United States signed into law the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (“CARES”)

Act in response to the coronavirus pandemic. This legislation aims at providing relief for individuals and businesses that have been

negatively impacted by the coronavirus pandemic.

The CARES Act includes a provision for the Company to opt out of applying the “troubled-debt restructuring” (“TDR”) accounting guidance in ASC 310-40 for certain loan modifications. Loan modifications made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of i) December 30, 2020 or ii) 60 days after the President declares a termination of the COVID-19 national emergency are eligible for this relief if the related loans were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. The Bank adopted this provision.

Adoption of New Accounting Standards

~~ASU 2019-01 - Leases: Codification Improvements (Topic 842)~~

In March 2019, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2019-01, “Leases: Codification Improvements (Topic 842).” ASU 2019-01 aligns the new leases guidance with existing guidance for fair value of the underlying asset by lessors that are not manufacturers or dealers, and clarifies an exemption for lessors and lessees from a certain interim disclosure requirement associated with adopting the FASB’s new lease accounting standard. Although this guidance is effective for years beginning after December 15, 2019, the Company adopted this guidance along with the adoption of ASU 2018-11, “Leases- Targeted Improvements,” and ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” The adoption of this guidance had a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. See the discussions regarding the adoptions of ASU 2018-11 and ASU 2016-02 below.

ASU ~~2018-13~~2018-15 - ~~Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)~~Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40)

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU ~~2018-13, “Disclosure Framework-Changes~~2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement,” to help entities evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement (hosting arrangement) by providing guidance for determining when the arrangement includes a software license.

The amendments in this Update align the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by the amendments in this Update.

The amendments in this ASU also require the entity (customer) to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement. The term of the hosting arrangement includes the non-cancellable period of the arrangement plus periods covered by (1) an option to extend the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain to exercise that option, (2) an option to terminate the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain not to exercise the termination option, and (3) an option to extend (or not to terminate) the arrangement in which exercise of the option is in the control of the vendor. The entity also is required to apply the existing impairment guidance in Subtopic 350-40 to the ~~Disclosure Requirements~~capitalized implementation costs as if the costs were long-lived assets.

The amendments in this ASU also require the entity to present the expense related to the capitalized implementation costs in the same line item in the statement of income as the fees associated with the hosting element (service) of the arrangement and classify payments for ~~Fair Value Measurement,~~capitalized implementation costs in the statement of cash flows in the same manner as payments made for fees associated with the hosting element. The entity is also required to present the capitalized implementation costs in the consolidated balance sheets in the same line item that a prepayment for the fees of the associated hosting arrangement would be presented.

The adoption of this guidance in 2020 did not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2018-14 - Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20)

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14 - “Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20),” which ~~modifies~~consists of amendments to the disclosure framework project to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to the financial statements. The amendments in this Update modify the disclosure requirements ~~on fair value measurements.~~ for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans.

The following disclosure requirements ~~that~~ are ~~applicable to public entities were~~ removed from ~~Topic 820:~~Subtopic 715-20:


1.	The ~~amount~~amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as components of ~~and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of~~net periodic benefit cost over the ~~fair value hierarchy;~~next fiscal year;


2.	The ~~policy for~~amount and timing of ~~transfers between levels; and~~plan assets expected to be returned to the employer;


3.	The ~~valuation process for Level 3 fair value measurements.~~disclosures related to the June 2001 amendments to the Japanese Welfare Pension Insurance Law;

~~The following disclosure requirements were modified in Topic 820:~~


1.4.	~~In lieu~~Related party disclosures about the amount of future annual benefits covered by insurance and annuity contracts and significant transactions between the employer or related parties and the plan;

For nonpublic entities, the reconciliation of the opening balances to the closing balances of plan assets measured on a ~~roll-forward for~~recurring basis in Level 3 of the fair value ~~measurements, a~~hierarchy. However, nonpublic ~~entity is~~entities will be required to disclose separately the amounts of transfers into and out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy ~~in addition to~~and purchases ~~and issues~~ of Level 3 ~~assets~~plan assets; and ~~liabilities;~~

2.6.

For ~~investments~~public entities, the effects of a one-percentage point change in ~~certain entities that calculate~~assumed health care cost trend rates on the (a) aggregate of the service and interest cost components of net ~~asset value, an entity is required to disclose the timing of liquidation of an investee’s assets~~periodic benefit costs and ~~the date when restrictions from redemption might lapse, only if the investee has communicated the timing to the entity or announced the timing publicly; and~~(b) benefit obligation for postretirement health care benefits.


3.	~~The amendments clarify that the measurement uncertainty disclosure is to communicate information about the uncertainty in measurement as of the reporting date.~~

The following disclosure requirements ~~applicable to public companies were~~are added to ~~Topic 820:~~Subtopic 715-20:


1.	The ~~changes in unrealized~~weighted-average interest crediting rates for cash balance plans and other plans with promised interest crediting rates; and


2.	An explanation of the reasons for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the ~~period included in other comprehensive income for recurring Level 3~~period.

The amendments in this ASU also clarify the disclosure requirements in paragraph 715-20-50-3, which state that the following information for defined benefit pension plans should be disclosed:


1.	The projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) and fair value ~~measurements held at the end~~ of ~~the reporting period;~~plan assets for plans with PBOs in excess of plan assets; and

The ~~range~~accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) and ~~weighted average of significant unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3~~ fair value ~~measurements. For certain unobservable inputs, an entity may disclose other quantitative information (such as the median or arithmetic average)~~of plan assets for plans with ABOs in ~~lieu~~excess of the weighted average if the entity determines that other quantitative information would be a more reasonable and rational method to reflect the distribution of unobservable inputs used to develop Level 3 fair value measurements.plan assets.

~~In addition,~~The amendments in this ASU remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of disclosures and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. Although narrow in scope, the amendments ~~eliminate “at a minimum” from~~are considered an important part of the ~~phrase “an entity shall disclose at a minimum”~~FASB’s efforts to ~~promote~~improve the ~~appropriate exercise~~effectiveness of ~~discretion~~disclosures in the notes to financial statements by ~~entities when considering fair value measurement disclosures and to clarify that materiality is an appropriate consideration of entities and their auditors when evaluating disclosure requirements.~~applying concepts in the Concepts Statement.

For the Company, the provisions of this ASU are effective for fiscal years ~~beginning~~ending after December 15, ~~2018, including interim periods within those years.~~2020. The adoption of this guidance ~~effective January 1, 2019~~in 2020 did not have a material impact on the ~~Company’s~~Company's consolidated financial statements.

~~ASU 2018-11 - Leases - Targeted Improvements (Topic 842)~~

In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-11, “Leases-Targeted Improvements,” which provides an additional (and optional) transition method for a cumulative effect adjustment. The additional transition method allows entities to initially apply the new lease standard at the adoption date (January 1, 2019 for calendar-year-end public business entities) and recognizes a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption. This additional transition method changes only when an entity is required to initially apply the transition requirements of the new leases standard; it does not change how those requirements apply. An entity’s reporting for the comparative periods presented in the financial statements in which it adopts the new lease standard will continue to be in accordance with the original U.S. GAAP (Topic 840, Leases).

For the Company, the provisions of this ASU were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years. The Company adopted this guidance effective January 1, 2019 along with the adoption of ASU 2016-02, “Leases.” The adoption of this guidance had a material impact on the Company's financial statements. See the discussion regarding the adoption of ASU 2016-02 on page 9.

~~ASU 2018-07 - Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718)~~

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, “Compensation-Stock Compensation,” which expands the scope of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for acquiring goods and services from non-employees.

The amendments specify that Topic 718 applies to all share-based payment transactions in which a grantor acquires goods or services to be used or consumed in a grantor’s own operations by issuing share-based payment awards. The amendment also clarifies that Topic 718 does not apply to share-based payments used to effectively provide (1) financing to the issuer, or (2) awards granted in conjunction with selling goods or services to customers as part of a contract accounted for under Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers.”

For the Company, the provisions of this ASU were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those years. The adoption of this guidance in 2019 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~ASU 2017-08 - Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities~~

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, “Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities,” which shortens the amortization period for premiums on purchased callable debt securities to the earliest call date (i.e., yield-to-earliest call amortization) rather than amortizing over the full contractual term. The ASU does not change the accounting for securities held at a discount.

The amendments apply to callable debt securities with explicit, non-contingent call features that are callable at fixed prices and on preset dates. If a security may be prepaid based upon prepayments of the underlying loans and not because the issuer exercised a date specific call option, it is excluded from the scope of the new standard. However, for instruments with contingent call features, once the contingency is resolved and the security is callable at a fixed price and preset date, the security is within the scope of the amendments. Further, the amendments apply to all premiums on callable debt securities, regardless of how they were generated.

The amendments require companies to reset the effective yield using the payment terms of the debt security if the call option is not exercised on the earliest call date. If the security has additional future call dates, any excess of the amortized cost basis over the amount repayable by the issuer at the next call date should be amortized to the next call date.

~~ASU 2016-02 - Leases (Topic 842)~~

~~In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 “Leases~~.”From the lessee’s perspective, the new standard establishes a right- of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as either finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern of expense recognition in the income statement for a lessee. From the lessor’s perspective, the new standard requires a lessor to classify leases as either sales-type, finance or operating. A lease will be treated as a sale if it transfers all of the risks and rewards, as well as control of the underlying asset, to the lessee. If risks and rewards are conveyed without the transfer of control, the lease is treated as a financing. If the lessor doesn’t convey risks and rewards or control, an operating lease results.

For the Company, the provisions of this ASU were effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2019 utilizing the optional transition method as provided by ASU 2018-11. Under the optional transition method, only the most recent period presented reflected the adoption with a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings and the comparative prior periods will be presented under the previous guidance of Topic 840.

This ASU includes a number of optional transition-related practical expedients. The Company elected to apply the practical expedients that relate to the identification and classification of leases that commenced before January 1, 2019 and the initial direct costs of those leases.

The election of these practical expedients allows the Company to continue to account for those leases that commenced before January 1, 2019 in accordance with previous U.S. GAAP. All of the Company’s leases that commenced before January 1, 2019 were operating leases. The lease expense will continue to be recognized based on the terms of the leases, except that a ROU asset and a lease liability was recognized for each operating lease at January 1, 2019 based on the present value of the remaining minimum lease payments.

At January 1, 2019, the Company had 16 leases for real property, which included leases for 13 of its branch offices and leases for 3 offices that are used for general office space. All of the real property leases included one or more options to extend the lease term. NaN of the leases for branch offices constituted a lease for the land under the building and the Company owned the leasehold improvements to these 2 leases. The Company also had 13 leases for office equipment, which were primarily copier/printers and one automobile lease.

For purposes of adopting this ASU, the Company assumed in general that it would exercise the next lease extension for each real estate lease in order to have use of the property for at least a 5 to 10 year future period. With respect to one lease for land, the Company assumed that it would exercise all extensions covering a 25 year period due to the significance of the leasehold improvements. None of the equipment leases include extensions and generally have three to five year terms.

Due to the significance of the leases for real estate and the assumption regarding the exercise of the extensions for one land lease, the adoption of this ASU resulted in the recognition of a significant lease liability and ROU assets.

The Company adopted this ASU effective January 1, 2019 and recognized a lease liability of $16.2 million and ROU assets of $15.7 million. The adoption of this guidance in 2019 had a material impact on the Company’s financial condition.

(2) Acquisition of ~~New Jersey~~Shore Community Bank

On ~~April 11, 2018,~~November 8, 2019, the Company completed its acquisition of 100 percent of the ~~merger~~shares of ~~New Jersey~~common stock of Shore Community Bank ~~(“NJCB”~~("Shore"), which merged with and into the Bank (the ~~“NJCB~~“Shore Merger”). The former shareholders of ~~NJCB~~Shore received total consideration of ~~$8.6~~$54.3 million, which was comprised of ~~249,785~~1,509,275 shares of common stock of the Company with a market value of ~~$5.5~~$29.2 million and cash ~~consideration~~ of ~~$3.1~~$25.1 million, of which ~~$401,000~~$925,000 was ~~placed~~cash paid in escrow to cover costs and expenses, including settlement costs, if any, resulting from a certain litigation matter. In June 2019, the Company reached a settlement in the litigation matter. The escrow balance of approximately $393,000, net of costs and expenses, was paid out to the former NJCB shareholders in the third quarter of 2019.exchange for unexercised outstanding stock options.

The ~~NJCB~~Shore Merger was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting, and accordingly, assets acquired, liabilities assumed and consideration exchanged were recorded at preliminary estimated fair values as of the ~~acquisition~~Shore Merger date. ~~NJCB’s~~The excess of the fair value of the consideration paid over the preliminary net fair value of Shore's assets and liabilities resulted in the recognition of goodwill of $23.2 million. Shore’s results of operations have been included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income since ~~April 11, 2018.~~November 8, 2019.

The assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the ~~NJCB Merger~~merger were recorded at their estimated fair values based on management’s best estimates, using information available at the date of the ~~NJCB Merger,~~merger, including the use of ~~third-party~~third party valuation specialists. The fair values are preliminary estimates and subject to adjustment for up to one year after the closing date of the Shore Merger.

The following table summarizes the fair value of the acquired assets and liabilities assumed:


(Dollars in thousands)	Amount			Amount
Consideration paid:
Company stock issued	$	5,494		$	29,175
Cash payment	2,668			24,233
Cash held in escrow	401
Cash payment for unexercised outstanding stock options				925
Total consideration paid	$	8,563		$	54,333


Recognized amounts of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed at fair value:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2,073		$	32,599
Investment securities available for sale	11,173			26,440
Loans	75,144			205,833
Premises and equipment, net	1,120			4,433
Core deposit intangible asset	80			1,467
Bank-owned life insurance	3,972			7,250
Right-of-use assets				3,226
Accrued interest receivable	259			778
Other real estate owned	1,230			605
Other assets	1,601			2,518
Deposits	(87,223		)	(249,836		)
Lease liability				(3,226		)
Other liabilities	(636		)	(948		)
Total identifiable assets and liabilities, net	$	8,793		$	31,139

Gain from bargain purchase	$	230
Goodwill recorded from Shore merger				$	23,194

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805-10 provides that if the initial accounting for a business combination is incomplete by the end of the reporting period in which the combination occurs, the acquirer shall report, in its financial statements, provisional amounts for the items for which the accounting is incomplete. During the measurement period, the acquirer shall retrospectively adjust the provisional amounts recognized at the acquisition date and may recognize additional assets or liabilities to reflect new information obtained from facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts recognized as of that date. The measurement period may not exceed one year from the acquisition date.

Investments were recorded at fair value, utilizing quoted market prices on nationally recognized exchanges (Level 1) or by using Level 2 inputs. For Level 2 securities, the Company obtained fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows, the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayments speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions, among other things.

Loans acquired in the Shore Merger were recorded at fair value and subsequently accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 310. The fair values of loans acquired were estimated, utilizing cash flow projections based on the remaining maturity and repricing terms. Cash flows were adjusted for estimated future credit losses of approximately $3.6 million and estimated prepayments. Projected cash flows were then discounted to present value, utilizing a risk-adjusted market rate for similar loans that management determined market participants would likely use.

At the Shore Merger date, the Company recorded $201.3 million of loans without evidence of credit quality deterioration and $4.6 million of loans with evidence of credit quality deterioration.

The following table summarizes the composition of the loans acquired and recorded at fair value:



	At November 8, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	Loans acquired with no credit quality deterioration		Loans acquired with credit quality deterioration		Total
Commercial
Construction	$	9,733	$	—	$	9,733
Commercial real estate	135,482		4,071		139,553
Commercial business	12,027		—		12,027
Residential real estate	36,849		500		37,349
Consumer	7,171		—		7,171
Total loans	$	201,262	$	4,571	$	205,833

The following is a summary of the loans acquired with evidence of deteriorated credit quality in the Shore Merger as of the date of the closing of the merger:



(Dollars in thousands)	Acquired Credit Impaired Loans
Contractually required principal and interest at acquisition	$	7,584
Contractual cash flows not expected to be collected (non-accretable difference)	2,355

Expected cash flows at acquisition	5,229
Interest component of expected cash flows (accretable difference)	658

Fair value of acquired loans	$	4,571

Bank-owned life insurance was recorded at the cash surrender value of the insurance policies, which approximates the redemption value of the policies.

The Company recorded a core deposit intangible asset related to a value ascribed to demand, interest checking, money market and savings account, referred to as core deposits, acquired as part of the acquisition. The value assigned to the acquired core deposits represents the future economic benefit of the potential cost savings from acquiring the core deposits, net of operating expenses and including ancillary fee income, compared to the cost of obtaining alternative funds from available market sources. Management used estimates including the expected attrition rates of depository accounts, future interest rate levels, and the cost of servicing various depository products. The core deposit intangible asset totaled $1.5 million and is being amortized over its estimated useful life of approximately 10 years, using an accelerated method.

The following table presents the projected amortization of the core deposit intangible asset for each period:



(Dollars in thousands)	Amount
Year
2020	$	262
2021	236
2022	209
2023	182
2024	156
Thereafter	378
Total	$	1,423

The fair values of deposit liabilities with no stated maturities, such as checking, money market and savings accounts, were assumed to equal the carrying value amounts since these deposits are payable on demand. The fair values of certificates of deposit represent the present value of contractual cash flows discounted at market rates for similar certificates of deposit.

Direct costs related to the Shore Merger were expensed as incurred. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company incurred $1.7 million of expenses for termination of contracts, legal and financial advisory fees, severance and other integration related expenses, which have been separately stated as merger-related expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income.

Supplemental Pro Forma Financial Information

The following table presents financial information regarding the former Shore operations included in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2020 under the column "Shore Three Months Ended 3/31/2020." In addition, the table presents unaudited condensed pro forma financial information assuming that the Shore Merger had been completed as of January 1, 2019.

The table has been prepared for comparative purposes only and is not necessarily indicative of the actual results that would have been attained had the Shore Merger occurred as of the beginning of the periods presented, nor is it indicative of future results. Furthermore, the unaudited pro forma financial information does not reflect management’s estimate of any revenue-enhancing opportunities nor anticipated cost savings that may have occurred as a result of the integration and consolidation of Shore’s operations.



(Dollars in thousands)	Shore Three Months Ended 3/31/2020		Actual for the Three Months Ended 3/31/2020		Pro Forma for the Three Months Ended 3/31/2019
Net interest income	$	2,065	$	12,936	$	13,736
Non-interest income	113		2,456		2,044
Non-interest expenses	979		9,793		9,624
Income taxes	369		1,283		1,632
Net income	830		3,421		4,224

(3) Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings per common share is calculated by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, as adjusted for the assumed exercise of dilutive common stock ~~warrants and common stock~~ options using the treasury stock method.

Awards of restricted shares are included in outstanding shares when granted. Unvested restricted shares are entitled to non-forfeitable dividends and participate in undistributed earnings with common shares. Awards of this nature are considered participating securities and basic and diluted earnings per share are computed under the two-class method.

Dilutive securities in the tables below exclude common stock options ~~and warrants~~ with exercise prices that exceed the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the periods presented. Inclusion of these common stock options ~~and warrants~~ would be anti-dilutive to the diluted earnings per common share calculation. For the three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018, 27,930~~41,430 options and 030,630 options, respectively, were anti-dilutive and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per ~~share. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, 27,930 and 0 options, respectively, were anti-dilutive and were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per common~~ share.

The following table illustrates the calculation of both basic and diluted earnings per share for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:


	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019

Net income	$	3,623	$	4,011	$	10,390	$	8,735	$	3,421	$	3,397

Basic weighted average shares outstanding	8,666,251		8,392,631		8,641,684		8,282,889		10,200,836		8,624,088
Plus: common stock equivalents	56,098		286,048		57,275		282,512		61,211		69,916
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding	8,722,349		8,678,679		8,698,959		8,565,401		10,262,047		8,694,004
Earnings per share:
Basic	$	0.42	$	0.48	$	1.20	$	1.05	$	0.34	$	0.39
Diluted	$	0.42	$	0.46	$	1.19	$	1.02	$	0.33	$	0.39

(4) Investment Securities

A summary of amortized cost and approximate fair value of investment securities available for sale follows:


	September 30, 2019									March 31, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities (“GSE”)	$	1,998	$	2	$	—		$	2,000	$	3,968	$	—	$	(16	)	$	3,952
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations - GSE	50,334		276		(147		)	50,463		47,196		866		(292		)	47,770
Residential mortgage backed securities - GSE	14,177		247		(1		)	14,423		19,177		693		(23		)	19,847
Obligations of state and political subdivisions	19,162		309		(3		)	19,468		34,941		637		(1		)	35,577
Trust preferred debt securities - single issuer	1,491		—		(102		)	1,389		1,493		—		(230		)	1,263
Corporate debt securities	23,246		111		(241		)	23,116		26,702		160		(1,052		)	25,810
Other debt securities	24,268		79		(122		)	24,225		30,022		146		(662		)	29,506
Total	$	134,676	$	1,024	$	(616	)	$	135,084	$	163,499	$	2,502	$	(2,276	)	$	163,725


	December 31, 2018									December 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities (“GSE”)	$	2,993	$	—	$	(41	)	$	2,952	$	774	$	—	$	(10	)	$	764
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations - GSE	48,789		70		(676		)	48,183		53,223		194		(242		)	53,175
Residential mortgage backed securities - GSE	13,945		37		(100		)	13,882		18,100		292		(5		)	18,387
Obligations of state and political subdivisions	23,506		85		(249		)	23,342		33,177		342		—			33,519
Trust preferred debt securities - single issuer	1,490		—		(161		)	1,329		1,492		—		(50		)	1,442
Corporate debt securities	28,323		—		(1,037		)	27,286		23,224		139		(84		)	23,279
Other debt securities	15,383		11		(146		)	15,248		25,378		80		(242		)	25,216
Total	$	134,429	$	203	$	(2,410	)	$	132,222	$	155,368	$	1,047	$	(633	)	$	155,782

A summary of amortized cost, carrying value and approximate fair value of investment securities held to maturity follows:


	September 30, 2019														March 31, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Other-Than- Temporary Impairment Recognized In Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Other-Than- Temporary Impairment Recognized In Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations - GSE	$	5,553	$	—		$	5,553	$	88	$	(17	)	$	5,624	$	7,877	$	—		$	7,877	$	383	$	—	$	8,260
Residential mortgage backed securities - GSE	35,915		—			35,915		460		(14		)	36,361		34,622		—			34,622		1,312		—		35,934
Obligations of state and political subdivisions	30,780		—			30,780		766		—			31,546		43,455		—			43,455		632		—		44,087
Trust preferred debt securities - pooled	657		(495		)	162		558		—			720		656		(489		)	167		400		—		567
Other debt securities	2,499		—			2,499		13		—			2,512		2,260		—			2,260		30		—		2,290
Total	$	75,404	$	(495	)	$	74,909	$	1,885	$	(31	)	$	76,763	$	88,870	$	(489	)	$	88,381	$	2,757	$	—	$	91,138


	December 31, 2018														December 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Other-Than- Temporary Impairment Recognized In Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Other-Than- Temporary Impairment Recognized In Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Carrying Value		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations - GSE	$	6,701	$	—		$	6,701	$	30	$	(143	)	$	6,588	$	5,117	$	—		$	5,117	$	76	$	(35	)	$	5,158
Residential mortgage backed securities - GSE	31,343		—			31,343		84		(346		)	31,081		36,528		—			36,528		481		(54		)	36,955
Obligations of state and political subdivisions	38,494		—			38,494		634		(118		)	39,010		32,533		—			32,533		690		(25		)	33,198
Trust preferred debt securities - pooled	657		(501		)	156		569		—			725		657		(492		)	165		479		—			644
Other debt securities	2,878		—			2,878		—		(78		)	2,800		2,277		—			2,277		—		(9		)	2,268
Total	$	80,073	$	(501	)	$	79,572	$	1,317	$	(685	)	$	80,204	$	77,112	$	(492	)	$	76,620	$	1,726	$	(123	)	$	78,223

At ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018, $67.9~~2019, $109.2 million and ~~$80.4~~$92.2 million of investment securities, respectively, were pledged to secure public funds and collateralized borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”) and for other purposes required or permitted by law.

Restricted stock was included in other assets at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and totaled ~~$6.1~~$5.4 million and ~~$4.1~~$4.3 million, respectively. Restricted stock consisted of ~~$6.0~~$5.2 million of FHLB stock and ~~$135,000~~$160,000 of Atlantic Community Bankers Bank stock at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~$3.9~~$4.2 million of FHLB and ~~$135,000~~$160,000 of Atlantic Community Bankers Bank stock at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding the amortized cost, carrying value, fair value, weighted average yields and contractual maturities of the Company’s investment portfolio as of ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.


	September 30, 2019						March 31, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Yield		Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Yield
Available for sale
Due in one year or less	$	4,107	$	4,102	3.70	%	$	13,440	$	13,401	3.01	%
Due after one year through five years	32,765		32,821		2.71	%	33,858		33,707		2.65	%
Due after five years through ten years	29,185		29,151		2.81	%	37,027		36,689		2.52	%
Due after ten years	68,619		69,010		2.90	%	79,174		79,928		2.39	%
Total	$	134,676	$	135,084	2.86	%	$	163,499	$	163,725	2.52	%

	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Yield		Carrying Value		Fair Value		Yield
Held to maturity
Due in one year or less	$	5,800	$	5,831	3.54	%	$	19,871	$	19,946	2.19	%
Due after one year through five years	16,051		16,375		3.80	%	11,855		12,117		3.67	%
Due after five years through ten years	19,148		19,560		3.13	%	16,925		17,560		3.09	%
Due after ten years	33,910		34,997		3.17	%	39,730		41,515		2.82	%
Total	$	74,909	$	76,763	3.32	%	$	88,381	$	91,138	2.84	%

Gross unrealized losses on available for sale and held to maturity securities and the fair value of the related securities aggregated by security category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 were as follows:


	September 30, 2019																March 31, 2020
		Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total						Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Number of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities (GSE) and agencies																	2	$	3,952	$	(16	)	$	—	$	—		$	3,952	$	(16	)
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations - GSE	12	$	11,190	$	(31	)	$	13,653	$	(133	)	$	24,843	$	(164	)	9	$	4,352	$	(22	)	$	12,966	$	(270	)	$	17,318	$	(292	)
Residential mortgage backed securities - GSE	14	5,723		(12		)	1,320		(3		)	7,043		(15		)	23	2,158		(23		)	—		—			2,158		(23		)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions	5	1,024		(1		)	529		(2		)	1,553		(3		)	4	1,424		(1		)	—		—			1,424		(1		)
Trust preferred debt securities - single issuer	2	—		—			1,389		(102		)	1,389		(102		)	2	—		—			1,263		(230		)	1,263		(230		)
Corporate debt securities	7	9,139		(61		)	7,857		(180		)	16,996		(241		)	8	17,858		(836		)	1,784		(216		)	19,642		(1,052		)
Other debt securities	8	13,653		(91		)	3,733		(31		)	17,386		(122		)	11	12,870		(313		)	7,016		(349		)	19,886		(662		)
Total temporarily impaired securities	48	$	40,729	$	(196	)	$	28,481	$	(451	)	$	69,210	$	(647	)	59	$	42,614	$	(1,211	)	$	23,029	$	(1,065	)	$	65,643	$	(2,276	)


	December 31, 2018																December 31, 2019
		Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total						Less than 12 months					12 months or longer					Total
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Number of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses			Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities (GSE) and agencies	2	$	994	$	(1	)	$	1,958	$	(40	)	$	2,952	$	(41	)	1	$	764	$	(10	)	$	—	$	—		$	764	$	(10	)
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations - GSE	34	20,756		(138		)	22,106		(682		)	42,862		(819		)	39	18,328		(138		)	13,300		(139		)	31,628		(277		)
Residential mortgage backed securities - GSE	68	18,393		(141		)	19,402		(305		)	37,795		(446		)	13	5,505		(59		)	—		—			5,505		(59		)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions	67	12,785		(154		)	11,638		(213		)	24,423		(367		)	4	2,311		(25		)	527		—			2,838		(25		)
Trust preferred debt securities - single issuer	2	1,329		(162		)	—		—			1,329		(162		)	2	—		—			1,442		(50		)	1,442		(50		)
Corporate debt securities	10	8,912		(632		)	18,374		(405		)	27,286		(1,037		)	4	2,994		(5		)	7,954		(79		)	10,948		(84		)
Other debt securities	9	10,943		(93		)	4,613		(130		)	15,556		(223		)	12	13,692		(151		)	5,598		(100		)	19,290		(251		)
Total temporarily impaired securities	192	$	74,112	$	(1,321	)	$	78,091	$	(1,775	)	$	152,203	$	(3,095	)	75	$	43,594	$	(388	)	$	28,821	$	(368	)	$	72,415	$	(756	)

U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. government-sponsored entities and agencies: The unrealized losses on investments in these securities were caused by increases in market interest rates. The Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these investments before a market price recovery or maturity. Therefore, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Residential collateralized mortgage obligations and residential mortgage backed securities: The unrealized losses on investments in residential collateralized mortgage obligations and mortgage backed securities were caused by increases in market interest rates. The contractual cash flows of these securities are guaranteed by the issuers, which are primarily government or government sponsored agencies. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. The decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality. The Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these investments before a market price recovery or maturity. Therefore, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Obligations of state and political subdivisions: The unrealized losses on investments in these securities were caused by increases in market interest rates. It is expected that the securities would not be settled at a price less than the amortized cost of the investment. None of the issuers have defaulted on interest payments. These investments are not considered to be other than temporarily impaired because the decline in fair value is attributable to changes in interest rates and not credit quality. The Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these investments before a market price recovery or maturity. Therefore, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Trust preferred debt securities – single issuer: The investments in these securities with unrealized losses are comprised of 2 corporate trust preferred securities issued by 1 large financial institution that mature in 2027. The contractual terms of the trust preferred securities do not allow the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the face value of the trust preferred securities, which is greater than the amortized cost of the trust preferred securities. The issuer maintains an investment grade credit rating and has not defaulted on interest payments. The decline in fair value is attributable to the widening of interest rate and credit spreads and the lack of an active trading market for these securities. The Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell these investments before a market price recovery or maturity. Therefore, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Corporate debt securities. The unrealized losses on investments in corporate debt securities were caused by an increase in market interest rates, which includes the yield required by market participants for the issuer’s credit risk. All of the issuers maintain an investment grade rating and none of the corporate issuers have defaulted on interest payments. The decline in fair value is attributable to changes in market interest rates. The Company does not intend to sell these investments and it is not more likely than not that the

Company will be required to sell these investments before a market price recovery or maturity. Therefore, these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.

Trust preferred debt securities – pooled: This trust preferred debt security was issued by a ~~2-issuer~~2 issuer pool (Preferred Term Securities XXV, Ltd. co-issued by Keefe, Bruyette and Woods, Inc. and First Tennessee (“PRETSL XXV”)), consisting primarily of ~~debt securities issued by~~ financial institution holding companies. During 2009, the Company recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge of $865,000, of which $364,000 was determined to be a credit loss and charged to operations and $501,000 was recognized in the other comprehensive income (loss) component of shareholders’ equity.

The primary factor used to determine the credit portion of the impairment loss to be recognized in the income statement for this security was the discounted present value of projected cash flow, where that present value of cash flow was less than the amortized cost basis of the security. The present value of cash flow was developed using a model that considered performing collateral ratios, the level of subordination to senior tranches of the security and credit ratings of and projected credit defaults in the underlying collateral.

~~On a quarterly basis, management evaluates~~ Due to recovery of the cash flows underlying the security, the Company began to ~~determine if any additional other-than-temporary~~accrete the $501,000 of impairment ~~("OTTI") is required. As~~charge in the other comprehensive income component in 2019. Total accretion of ~~September 30, 2019, the security~~$3,000 was ~~in an unrealized gain position and the security was receiving the interest and principal allocable to it. Beginning~~recognized in the first quarter ~~of 2019, a portion of the $501,000 other-than-temporary impairment was recognized~~2020 as an increase in the carrying amount of the security. ~~The remaining balance will be recognized over the remaining term~~On a quarterly basis, management evaluates this security to determine if any additional other-than-temporary impairment is required. As of ~~the security, which is approximately 18 years. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, OTTI was reduced to $495,000.~~March 31, 2020, management concluded that no additional other-than-temporary impairment had occurred.

(5) Allowance for Loan Losses and Credit Quality

The Company’s primary lending emphasis is the origination of commercial real estate loans, mortgage warehouse lines of credit and commercial business loans. Based on the composition of the loan portfolio, the inherent primary risks are deteriorating credit quality, a decline in the economy and a decline in New Jersey and New York City metropolitan area real estate market values. Any one, or a combination, of these events may adversely affect the loan portfolio and may result in increased delinquencies, loan losses and increased future provision levels.

The following table provides an aging of the loan portfolio by loan class at ~~September 30, 2019:~~March 31, 2020:

(Dollars in thousands) 30-59 Days
60-89
Days

Greater
than 90
Days

Total Past
Due
Current
Total
Loans
Receivable

Recorded
Investment
> 90 Days
Accruing

Non-accrual
Loans
Commercial real estate $ —
$ 189
$ 2,745
$ 2,934
$ 419,840
$ 422,774
$ —
$ 2,444
Mortgage warehouse lines —
—
—
—
252,704
252,704
—
—
Construction —
—
—
—
156,394
156,394
—
—
Commercial business 486
163
331
980
114,420
115,400
—
661
Residential real estate 456
—
957
1,413
53,610
55,023
—
1,374
Loans to individuals —
16
395
411
21,783
22,194
—
787
Other —
—
—
—
160
160
—
—
Total loans $ 942
$ 368
$ 4,428
$ 5,738
$ 1,018,911
1,024,649
$ —
$ 5,266
Deferred loan costs, net 382

Total loans $ 1,025,031



(Dollars in thousands)	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Recorded Investment > 90 Days Accruing		Non-accrual Loans
Commercial real estate	$	347	$	—	$	5,626	$	5,973	$	570,914	$	576,887	$	—	$	3,842
Mortgage warehouse lines	—		—		—		—		224,794		224,794		—		—
Construction	9,307		—		—		9,307		136,292		145,599		—		7,500
Commercial business	437		—		525		962		149,105		150,067		—		644
Residential real estate	962		292		673		1,927		87,420		89,347		—		687
Loans to individuals	580		—		154		734		29,821		30,555		—		525
Other loans	—		—		—		—		141		141		—		—
Total loans	$	11,633	$	292	$	6,978	$	18,903	$	1,198,487	1,217,390		$	—	$	13,198
Deferred loan costs, net											417
Total loans											$	1,217,807

The following table provides an aging of the loan portfolio by loan class at December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:


(Dollars in thousands)	30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Recorded Investment > 90 Days Accruing		Non-accrual Loans		30-59 Days		60-89 Days		Greater than 90 Days		Total Past Due		Current		Total Loans Receivable		Recorded Investment > 90 Days Accruing		Non-accrual Loans
Commercial real estate	$	—	$	499	$	1,201	$	1,700	$	386,731	$	388,431	$	—	$	1,439	$	238	$	1,927	$	3,882	$	6,047	$	561,608	$	567,655	$	—	$	2,596
Mortgage warehouse lines	—		—		—		—		154,183		154,183		—		—		—		—		—		—		236,672		236,672		—		—
Construction	—		—		—		—		149,387		149,387		—		—		—		—		—		—		148,939		148,939		—		—
Commercial business	280		—		466		746		119,844		120,590		—		3,532		381		—		330		711		138,560		139,271		—		501
Residential real estate	588		—		1,156		1,744		45,519		47,263		—		1,156		2,459		271		677		3,407		86,852		90,259		—		708
Loans to individuals	16		237		263		516		22,446		22,962		55		398		296		—		311		607		31,997		32,604		—		692
Other	—		—		—		—		181		181		—		—
Other loans																	—		—		—		—		137		137		—		—
Total loans	$	884	$	736	$	3,086	$	4,706	$	878,291	882,997		$	55	$	6,525	$	3,374	$	2,198	$	5,200	$	10,772	$	1,204,765	$	1,215,537	$	—	$	4,497
Deferred loan costs, net											167																491
Total loans											$	883,164															$	1,216,028

As provided by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 310-30, the excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the initial investment in the loan is recognized as interest income over the life of the loan. At ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there were ~~$843,000~~$5.2 million and ~~$865,000~~$5.4 million of purchased credit impaired loans, respectively, that were not classified as non-performing loans due to the accretion of income based on their original contract terms.

The Company’s internal credit risk grades are based on the definitions currently utilized by the banking regulatory agencies. The grades assigned and their definitions are as follows, and loans graded excellent, above average, good and watch list are treated as “pass” for grading purposes:

1. Excellent - Loans that are based upon cash collateral held at the Company and adequately margined. Loans that are based upon “blue chip” stocks listed on the major stock exchanges and adequately margined.

2. Above Average - Loans to companies whose balance sheets show excellent liquidity and long-term debt is on well-spread schedules of repayment easily covered by cash flow. Such companies have been consistently profitable and have diversification in their product lines or sources of revenue. The continuation of profitable operations for the foreseeable future is likely. Management is comprised of a mix of ages, experience and backgrounds and management succession is in place. Sources of raw materials and, for service companies, the sources of revenue are abundant. Future needs have been planned for. Character and management ability of individuals or company principals are excellent. Loans to individuals are supported by their high net worth and liquid assets.

3. Good - Loans to companies whose balance sheets show good liquidity and cash flow adequate to meet maturities of long-term debt with a comfortable margin. Such companies have established profitable records over a number of years, and there has been growth in net worth. Operating ratios are in line with those of the industry, and expenses are in proper relationship to the volume of business done and the profits achieved. Management is well-balanced and competent in their responsibilities. Economic environment is favorable; however, competition is strong. The prospects for growth are good. Loans in this category do not meet the collateral requirements of loans graded excellent and above average.

3w. Watch - Included in this category are loans evidencing problems identified by Company management that require closer supervision, but do not require a “special mention” rating. This category also covers situations where the Company does not have adequate current information upon which credit quality can be determined. The account officer has the obligation to correct these deficiencies within 30 days from the time of notification.

4. Special Mention - A “special mention” loan has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or the Company’s credit position at some future date. Special mention loans are not adversely classified and do not expose the Company to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification.

5. Substandard - A “substandard” loan is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or by the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified must have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

6. Doubtful - A loan classified as “doubtful” has all the weaknesses inherent of a loan classified as substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently known facts, conditions and values, highly questionable and improbable.

7. Loss - A loan classified as “loss” is considered uncollectible and of such little value that its continuance on the books is not warranted. This classification does not mean that the loan has absolutely no recovery or salvage value. Rather, this classification indicates that it is not practical or desirable to defer writing off this loan even though partial recovery may occur in the future.

The following table provides a breakdown of the loan portfolio by credit quality indicator at ~~September 30, 2019:~~March 31, 2020:


(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial Credit Exposure - By Internally Assigned Grade	Construction		Commercial Business		Commercial Real Estate		Mortgage Warehouse Lines		Residential Real Estate		Construction		Commercial Business		Commercial Real Estate		Mortgage Warehouse Lines		Residential Real Estate
Pass	$	154,587	$	105,818	$	399,815	$	252,704	$	53,347	$	136,292	$	146,829	$	549,099	$	224,105	$	86,467
Special Mention	—		7,911		7,967		—		85		—		1,871		8,262		689		1,062
Substandard	1,807		1,671		14,992		—		1,591		9,307		1,283		19,526		—		1,818
Doubtful	—		—		—		—		—		—		84		—		—		—
Total	$	156,394	$	115,400	$	422,774	$	252,704	$	55,023	$	145,599	$	150,067	$	576,887	$	224,794	$	89,347


Consumer Credit Exposure - By Payment Activity	Loans To Individuals		Other		Loans To Individuals		Other loans
Performing	$	21,407	$	160	$	30,030	$	141
Non-performing	787		—		525		—
Total	$	22,194	$	160	$	30,555	$	141

The following table provides a breakdown of the loan portfolio by credit quality indicator at December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:


(Dollars in thousands)
Commercial Credit Exposure - By Internally Assigned Grade	Construction		Commercial Business		Commercial Real Estate		Mortgage Warehouse Lines		Residential Real Estate		Construction		Commercial Business		Commercial Real Estate		Mortgage Warehouse Lines		Residential Real Estate
Pass	$	146,460	$	104,162	$	366,424	$	152,378	$	45,825	$	147,132	$	135,804	$	538,104	$	235,808	$	87,512
Special Mention	2,927		12,703		13,317		1,805		103		—		1,990		9,994		864		922
Substandard	—		3,487		8,690		—		1,335		1,807		1,477		19,557		—		1,825
Doubtful	—		238		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	149,387	$	120,590	$	388,431	$	154,183	$	47,263	$	148,939	$	139,271	$	567,655	$	236,672	$	90,259


Consumer Credit Exposure - By Payment Activity	Loans To Individuals		Other		Loans To Individuals		Other loans
Performing	$	22,564	$	181	$	31,912	$	137
Non-performing	398		—		692		—
Total	$	22,962	$	181	$	32,604	$	137

Impaired Loans

Loans are considered to be impaired when, based on current information and events, it is determined that the Company will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the loan agreement, including scheduled interest payments. When a loan is placed on non-accrual status, it is also considered to be impaired. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when: (1) the full collection of interest or principal becomes uncertain or (2) the loans are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments unless the loans are both well secured and in the process of collection.

The following tables summarize the distribution of the allowance for loan losses and loans receivable by loan class and impairment method at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:


	September 30, 2019																		March 31, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)	Construction		Commercial Business		Commercial Real Estate		Mortgage Warehouse Lines		Residential Real Estate		Loans to Individuals		Other		Unallocated		Total		Construction		Commercial Business		Commercial Real Estate		Mortgage Warehouse Lines		Residential Real Estate		Loans to Individuals		Other loans		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	8	$	5	$	55	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	68	$	—	$	19	$	72	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	91
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—		3		1		—		—		—		—		—		4		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Collectively evaluated for impairment	1,577		1,390		4,213		1,137		406		154				28		8,905		1,706		1,752		4,728		1,027		430		188				79		9,910
Ending Balance	$	1,585	$	1,398	$	4,269	$	1,137	$	406	$	154	$	—	$	28	$	8,977	$	1,706	$	1,771	$	4,800	$	1,027	$	430	$	188	$	—	$	79	$	10,001

Loans receivable:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	1,807	$	1,416	$	6,040	$	—	$	1,374	$	787	$	—	$	—	$	11,424	$	9,307	$	1,393	$	7,398	$	—	$	688	$	525	$	—	$	—	$	19,311
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—		340		1,365		—		—		—		—		—		1,705		—		328		5,164		—		513		—		—		—		6,005
Collectively evaluated for impairment	154,587		113,644		415,369		252,704		53,649		21,407		160		—		1,011,520		136,292		148,346		564,325		224,794		88,146		30,030		141		—		1,192,074
Ending Balance	$	156,394	$	115,400	$	422,774	$	252,704	$	55,023	$	22,194	$	160	$	—	1,024,649		$	145,599	$	150,067	$	576,887	$	224,794	$	89,347	$	30,555	$	141	$	—	1,217,390
Deferred loan costs, net																	382																		417
																	$	1,025,031																	$	1,217,807


	December 31, 2018																		December 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	Construction		Commercial Business		Commercial Real Estate		Mortgage Warehouse Lines		Residential Real Estate		Loans to Individuals		Other		Unallocated		Total		Construction		Commercial Business		Commercial Real Estate		Mortgage Warehouse Lines		Residential Real Estate		Loans to Individuals		Other loans		Unallocated		Total
Allowance for loan losses:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	380	$	71	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	451	$	8	$	7	$	50	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	65
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—		—		2		—		—		—		—		—		2		—		3		1		—		—		—		—		—		4
Collectively evaluated for impairment	1,732		1,449		3,366		731		431		148		—		92		7,949		1,381		1,399		4,473		1,083		412		185		—		269		9,202
Ending Balance	$	1,732	$	1,829	$	3,439	$	731	$	431	$	148	$	—	$	92	$	8,402	$	1,389	$	1,409	$	4,524	$	1,083	$	412	$	185	$	—	$	269	$	9,271

Loans receivable:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	103	$	3,775	$	5,093	$	—	$	1,156	$	398	$	—	$	—	$	10,525	$	1,807	$	1,251	$	6,171	$	—	$	708	$	692	$	—	$	—	$	10,629
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality	—		319		1,419		—		—		—		—		—		1,738		—		334		5,419		—		504		—		—		—		6,257
Collectively evaluated for impairment	149,284		116,496		381,919		154,183		46,107		22,564		181		—		870,734		147,132		137,686		556,065		236,672		89,047		31,912		137		—		1,198,651
Ending Balance	$	149,387	$	120,590	$	388,431	$	154,183	$	47,263	$	22,962	$	181	$	—	882,997		$	148,939	$	139,271	$	567,655	$	236,672	$	90,259	$	32,604	$	137	$	—	1,215,537
Deferred loan costs, net																	167																		491
																	$	883,164																	$	1,216,028

The activity in the allowance for loan loss by loan class for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ was as follows:

(Dollars in thousands) Construction
Commercial
Business

Commercial
Real Estate

Mortgage
Warehouse Lines

Residential
Real Estate
Loans to Individuals Other Unallocated Total
Balance - July 1, 2019 $ 1,760
$ 1,546
$ 3,754
$ 933
$ 480
$ 142
$ —
$ 26
$ 8,641
Provision charged/(credited) to operations (175 ) (148 ) 533
204
(74 ) 8
—
2
350
Loans charged off —
—
(18 ) —
—
—
—
—
(18 )
Recoveries of loans charged off —
—
—
—
—
4
—
—
4
Balance - September 30, 2019 $ 1,585
$ 1,398
$ 4,269
$ 1,137
$ 406
$ 154
$ —
$ 28
$ 8,977

July 1, 2018 $ 1,661
$ 1,665
$ 3,314
$ 920
$ 462
$ 169
$ —
$ 307
$ 8,498
Provision charged/(credited) to operations 60
21
484
(88 ) (95 ) (13 ) 18
(162 ) 225
Loans charged off —
—
(441 ) —
—
—
(18 ) —
(459 )
Recoveries of loans charged off —
1
—
—
—
—
—
—
1
Balance - September 30, 2018 $ 1,721
$ 1,687
$ 3,357
$ 832
$ 367
$ 156
$ —
$ 145
$ 8,265

(Dollars in thousands) Construction Commercial
Business Commercial
Real Estate Mortgage
Warehouse Lines Residential
Real Estate Loans to Individuals Other Unallocated Total
Balance - January 1, 2019 $ 1,732
$ 1,829
$ 3,439
$ 731
$ 431
$ 148
$ —
$ 92
$ 8,402
Provision charged/(credited) to operations (147 ) (86 ) 923
406
(25 ) —
43
(64 ) 1,050
Loans charged off —
(345 ) (93 ) —
—
—
(43 ) —
(481 )
Recoveries of loans charged off —
—
—
—
—
6
—
—
6
Balance - September 30, 2019 $ 1,585
$ 1,398
$ 4,269
$ 1,137
$ 406
$ 154
$ —
$ 28
$ 8,977

Balance - January 1, 2018 $ 1,703
$ 1,720
$ 2,949
$ 852
$ 392
$ 114
$ —
$ 283
$ 8,013
Provision charged/(credited) to operations 18
(15 ) 788
(20 ) (25 ) 48
19
(138 ) 675
Loans charged off —
(32 ) (441 ) —
—
(7 ) (19 ) —
(499 )
Recoveries of loans charged off —
14
61
—
—
1
—
—
76
Balance - September 30, 2018 $ 1,721
$ 1,687
$ 3,357
$ 832
$ 367
$ 156
$ —
$ 145
$ 8,265



(Dollars in thousands)	Construction		Commercial Business			Commercial Real Estate		Mortgage Warehouse Lines			Residential Real Estate			Loans to Individuals		Other loans		Unallocated			Total
Balance - January 1, 2020	$	1,389	$	1,409		$	4,524	$	1,083		$	412		$	185	$	—	$	269		$	9,271
Provision charged/(credited) to operations	317		527			276		(56		)	18			3		—		(190		)	895
Loans charged off	—		(165		)	—		—			—			—		—		—			(165		)
Recoveries of loans charged off	—		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—
Balance - March 31, 2020	$	1,706	$	1,771		$	4,800	$	1,027		$	430		$	188	$	—	$	79		$	10,001

January 1, 2019	$	1,732	$	1,829		$	3,439	$	731		$	431		$	148	$	—	$	92		$	8,402
Provision charged/(credited) to operations	62		(214		)	201		(149		)	(5		)	5		—		400			300
Loans charged off	—		—			—		—			—			—		—		—			—
Recoveries of loans charged off	—		—			—		—			—			2		—		—			2
Balance - March 31, 2019	$	1,794	$	1,615		$	3,640	$	582		$	426		$	155	$	—	$	492		$	8,704

When a loan is identified as impaired, the measurement of impairment is based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, except when the sole remaining source of repayment for the loan is the liquidation of the collateral. In such cases, the current fair value of the collateral less selling costs is used. If the value of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the impairment is recognized through an allowance estimate or a charge to the allowance.

Impaired Loans Receivables (By Class)


							Three Months Ended September 30, 2019				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019										Three Months Ended March 31, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no allowance:
Commercial:
Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	46	$	2	$	9,307	$	9,307	$	—	$	3,102	$	25
Commercial Business	915		1,230		—		951		4		952		56		1,658		3,190		—		1,095		18
Commercial Real Estate	2,635		3,091		—		2,819		17		1,999		50		8,354		9,510		—		7,792		94
Mortgage Warehouse Lines	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	3,550		4,321		—		3,770		21		2,997		108		19,319		22,007		—		11,989		137
Residential Real Estate	1,374		1,504		—		1,402		—		1,296		—		1,201		1,460		—		1,204		9
Consumer:
Loans to Individuals	787		891		—		792		—		675		—		525		640		—		680		—
Other	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other loans															—		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	2,161		2,395		—		2,194		—		1,971		—		525		640		—		680		—
With no allowance:	$	5,711	$	6,716	$	—	$	5,964	$	21	$	4,968	$	108	$	21,045	$	24,107	$	—	$	13,873	$	146

With an allowance:
Commercial:
Construction	$	1,807	$	1,807	$	8	$	602	$	29	$	201	$	29	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,204	$	—
Commercial Business	841		930		8		578		20		1,008		23		63		63		19		656		—
Commercial Real Estate	4,770		6,078		56		4,782		59		4,611		176		4,208		5,516		72		4,552		50
Mortgage Warehouse Lines	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	7,418		8,815		72		5,962		108		5,820		228		4,271		5,579		91		6,412		50
Residential Real Estate	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer:
Loans to Individuals	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other	—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Other loans															—		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
With an allowance:	$	7,418	$	8,815	$	72	$	5,962	$	108	$	5,820	$	228	$	4,271	$	5,579	$	91	$	6,412	$	50
Total:
Construction	1,807		1,807		8		602		29		247		31		9,307		9,307		—		4,306		25
Commercial Business	1,756		2,160		8		1,529		24		1,960		79		1,721		3,253		19		1,751		18
Commercial Real Estate	7,405		9,169		56		7,601		76		6,610		226		12,562		15,026		72		12,344		144
Mortgage Warehouse Lines	—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential Real Estate	1,374		1,504		—		1,402		—		1,296		—		1,201		1,460		—		1,204		9
Consumer	787		891		—		792		—		675		—		525		640		—		680		—
Total	$	13,129	$	15,531	$	72	$	11,926	$	129	$	10,788	$	336	$	25,316	$	29,686	$	91	$	20,285	$	196

Impaired Loans Receivables (By Class)


	December 31, 2018						December 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Related Allowance
With no allowance:
Commercial:
Construction	$	103	$	103	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial Business	992		1,332		—		680		1,971		—
Commercial Real Estate	2,304		2,629		—		7,141		8,204		—
Mortgage Warehouse Lines	—		—		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	3,399		4,064		—		7,821		10,175		—
Residential Real Estate	1,156		1,241		—		1,212		1,465		—
Consumer:
Loans to Individuals	398		478		—		692		802		—
Other	—		—		—
Other loans							—		—		—
Subtotal	398		478		—		692		802		—
With no allowance	$	4,953	$	5,783	$	—	$	9,725	$	12,442	$	—
With an allowance:
Commercial:
Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	1,807	$	1,807	$	8
Commercial Business	3,102		3,217		380		905		993		10
Commercial Real Estate	4,208		4,208		73		4,449		5,757		51
Mortgage Warehouse Lines	—		—		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	7,310		7,425		453		7,161		8,557		69
Residential Real Estate	—		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer:
Loans to Individuals	—		—		—		—		—		—
Other	—		—		—
Other loans							—		—		—
Subtotal	—		—		—		—		—		—
With an allowance	$	7,310	$	7,425	$	453	$	7,161	$	8,557	$	69

Total:
Construction	103		103		—		$	1,807	$	1,807	$	8
Commercial Business	4,094		4,549		380		1,585		2,964		10
Commercial Real Estate	6,512		6,837		73		11,590		13,961		51
Mortgage Warehouse Lines	—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential Real Estate	1,156		1,241		—		1,212		1,465		—
Consumer	398		478		—		692		802		—
Total	$	12,263	$	13,208	$	453	$	16,886	$	20,999	$	69

Impaired Loans Receivables (By Class)


	Three Months Ended September 30, 2018				Nine Months Ended September 30, 2018				Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized		Average Recorded Investment		Interest Income Recognized
With no allowance:
Commercial:
Construction	$	104	$	2	$	118	$	6	$	103	$	2
Commercial Business	1,022		28		1,201		83		951		26
Commercial Real Estate	2,557		27		2,870		74		1,757		16
Mortgage Warehouse Lines	—		—		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	3,683		57		4,189		163		2,811		44
Residential Real Estate	1,149		—		742		—		1,152		—

Consumer:
Loans to Individuals	409		—		413		—		552		—
Other	—		—		—		—
Other loans									—		—
Subtotal	409		—		413		—		552		—
With no allowance	$	5,241	$	57	$	5,344	$	163	$	4,515	$	44
With an allowance:
Commercial:
Construction	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Commercial Business	3,422		2		3,376		50		2,145		2
Commercial Real Estate	4,796		55		4,376		169		4,351		58
Mortgage Warehouse Lines	—		—		—		—		—		—
Subtotal	8,218		57		7,752		219		6,496		60
Residential Real Estate	—		—		—		—		—		—
Consumer:
Loans to Individuals	—		—		—		—		—		—
Other	—		—		—		—
Other loans									—		—
Subtotal	—		—		—		—		—		—
With an allowance	$	8,218	$	57	$	7,752	$	219	$	6,496	$	60
Total:
Construction	104		2		118		6		$	103	$	2
Commercial Business	4,444		30		4,577		133		3,096		28
Commercial Real Estate	7,353		82		7,246		243		6,108		74
Mortgage Warehouse Lines	—		—		—		—		—		—
Residential Real Estate	1,149		—		742		—		1,152		—
Consumer	409		—		413		—		552		—
Total	$	13,459	$	114	$	13,096	$	382	$	11,011	$	104

Purchased Credit-Impaired Loans

Purchased credit-impaired loans (“PCI”) are loans acquired at a discount due in part to the deteriorated credit quality. On ~~April 11, 2018,~~November 8, 2019, as part of the ~~NJCB~~Shore Merger, the Company acquired purchased credit-impaired loans with loan balances totaling ~~$1.1~~$6.3 million and fair values totaling ~~$881,000.~~$4.6 million. The following table presents additional information regarding purchased credit-impaired loans at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:


(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
Outstanding balance	$	1,873	$	2,007	$	7,625	$	8,038
Carrying amount	$	1,705	$	1,738	$	6,005	$	6,257

Changes in accretable discount for purchased credit-impaired loans for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019 ~~and September 30, 2018~~ were as follows:


	Three months ended September 30,						Nine months ended September 30,						Three months ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019
Balance at beginning of period	$	94		$	233		$	164		$	126		$	657		$	164
Acquisition of impaired loans	—			—			—			168
Accretion of discount	(23		)	(34		)	(93		)	(95		)	(135		)	(35		)
Balance at end of period	$	71		$	199		$	71		$	199		$	522		$	129

Consumer Mortgage Loans Secured by Residential Real Estate in Process of Foreclosure

The following table summarizes the recorded investment in consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate in the process of foreclosure (dollars in thousands):

September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018
Number of loans Recorded Investment Number of loans Recorded Investment
2 $ 651
4 $ 821



March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Number of loans	Recorded Investment		Number of loans	Recorded Investment
1	$	311	2	$	382

Troubled Debt Restructurings

In the normal course of business, the Bank may consider modifying loan terms for various reasons. These reasons may include as a retention strategy to compete in the current interest rate environment or to re-amortize or extend a loan term to better match the loan’s repayment stream with the borrower’s cash flow. A modified loan would be considered a troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) if the Bank grants a concession to a borrower and has determined that the borrower is troubled (i.e., experiencing financial difficulties).

If the Bank restructures a loan to a troubled borrower, the loan terms (i.e., interest rate, payment, amortization period and maturity date) may be modified in various ways to enable the borrower to cover the modified debt service payments based on current financial statements and cash flow adequacy. If a borrower’s hardship is thought to be temporary, then modified terms may be offered for only that time period. Where possible, the Bank attempts to obtain additional collateral and/or secondary repayment sources at the time of the restructuring in order to put the Bank in the best possible position if the borrower is not able to meet the modified terms. The Bank will not offer modified terms if it believes that modifying the loan terms will only delay an inevitable permanent default. In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a TDR, applicable guidance requires that a creditor must separately conclude that the restructuring constitutes a concession and the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties.

There were ~~3 commercial business~~0 loans with an aggregate pre- and post-modified recorded investment of $596,000 and 1 construction loan with a pre- and post-modified recorded investment of $1.8 million that were each modified as a TDR during the nine months ended September 30, 2019. There were 2 commercial real estate loans with an aggregate pre- and post-modified recorded investment of $1.0 million and 1 commercial business loan with a pre- and post-modified recorded investment of $135,000 that were each modified as a TDR during the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2020 and March 31, 2019. There were 0 TDRs that subsequently defaulted within 12 months of restructuring during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019 and 2018.~~March 31, 2020.

Pursuant to the CARES Act, loan modifications made between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of i) December 30, 2020 or ii) 60 days after the President declares a termination of the COVID-19 national emergency are not classified as TDRs if the related loans were not more than 30 days past due as of December 31, 2019. As of March 31, 2020, $16.6 million of loans to borrowers had been modified to defer the payment of interest and or principal for up to 90 days. These modified loans were not considered to be TDRs and are therefore excluded from the table above.

As of April 30, 2020, $77.5 million of commercial loans and $5.2 million of residential mortgage and home equity loans had been modified and the Bank had committed to modify $47.6 million of commercial loans and $446,000 of residential mortgage and home equity loans to provide deferral of interest and or principal for up to 90 days due to the adverse effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the operations and financial position of the borrowers.

(6) Revenue from Contracts with Customers

All of the Company’s revenue from contracts with customers in the scope of ASC 606 is recognized within non-interest income. The following table presents the Company’s sources of non-interest income for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. Items outside the scope of ASC 606 are noted as such.


	Three months ended				Nine months ended				Three months ended
(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		September 30, 2019		September 30, 2018		March 31, 2020		March 31, 2019
Service charges on deposit accounts:
Overdraft fees	$	100	$	96	$	272	$	257	$	95	$	89
Other	65		77		218		219		118		77
Interchange income	122		119		343		294		149		103
Other income - in scope	103		89		309		418		103		94
Gain on sale of OREO	—		—		137		—
Income on bank-owned life insurance⁽¹⁾	149		152		437		425		180		139
Net gains on sales of loans⁽¹⁾	1,351		1,292		3,556		3,425		1,470		1,045
Loan servicing fees ⁽¹⁾	181		174		540		482		166		179
Net gains on sales and calls of securities ⁽¹⁾	16		—		16		12
Gain from bargain purchase ⁽¹⁾	—		—		—		184
Gains on sales and calls of securities ⁽¹⁾									8		—
Other income⁽¹⁾	119		155		414		366		167		140
	$	2,206	$	2,154	$	6,242	$	6,082	$	2,456	$	1,866

⁽¹⁾ Not within the scope of ASC 606

(7) Share-Based Compensation

The Company’s share-based incentive plans (“Stock Plans”) authorize the issuance of an aggregate of 885,873 shares of the Company’s common stock (as adjusted for stock dividends) through awards that may be granted in the form of stock options to purchase common stock (each an “Option” and collectively, “Options”), awards of restricted shares of common stock (“Stock Awards”) and restricted stock units (“RSUs”).

As of ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, there were ~~398,991~~356,341 shares of common stock available for future grants under the Stock Plans.

The following table summarizes Options activity during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019:~~March 31, 2020:

(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts) Number of Shares Weighted Average Exercise Price Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2019 139,511
$ 8.70
4.0 $ 1,566
Granted 11,400
19.38

Exercised (24,277 ) 7.37

Forfeited (1,268 ) 17.91

Expired or exchanged (3,215 ) 13.03

Outstanding at September 30, 2019 122,151
$ 9.85
4.1 $ 1,087

Exercisable at September 30, 2019 103,145
$ 8.29
3.3 $ 1,078



(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)	Number of Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)	Aggregate Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2020	122,151	$	9.85	3.9	1,500
Granted	27,000	17.53
Outstanding at March 31, 2020	149,151	$	11.24	4.7	$	572

Exercisable at March 31, 2020	110,351	$	8.88	3.1	$	570

The fair value of each Option and the significant weighted average assumptions used to calculate the fair value of the Options granted during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 were as follows:


				Grant Date
				January 6, 2020			March 19, 2020
Fair value of options granted	$	5.63		$	5.27		$	2.09
Risk-free rate of return	2.55		%	1.72		%	1.00		%
Expected option life in years	7			7			7
Expected volatility	29.09		%	24.53		%	24.53		%
Expected dividends	1.56		%	1.35		%	2.86		%

Share-based compensation expense related to Options was ~~$46,000~~$32,000 and ~~$45,000~~$23,000 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ respectively. As of ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, there was approximately ~~$85,000~~$134,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested Options.

The following table summarizes the activity in ~~unvested shares of restricted stock~~Stock Awards for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019:~~March 31, 2020:


(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)	Number of Shares		Average Grant-Date Fair Value		Number of Shares		Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2019	147,533		$	13.21
Outstanding at January 1, 2020					134,359		$	13.84
Granted	53,931		18.30		15,650		21.92
Vested	(65,320	)	15.91		(25,165	)	16.73
Forfeited	(1,785	)	17.31
Non-vested at September 30, 2019	134,359		$	13.89
Non-vested at March 31, 2020					124,844		$	14.27

Share-based compensation expense related to Stock Awards was ~~$787,000~~$258,000 and ~~$714,000~~$246,000 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ respectively. As of ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, there was approximately $2$1.8 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested Stock Awards.

~~In January~~The following table summarizes the activity in Restricted Stock Units ("RSUs") for the three months ended March 31, 2020:



(Dollars in thousands, except share amounts)	Number of Shares		Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2020	10,300		$	19.38
Granted	18,950		21.92
Vested	(3,433	)	19.38
Non-vested at March 31, 2020	25,817		$	21.24

Share-based compensation expense related to RSUs was $76,000 and $17,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~the Company granted 10,300~~ respectively. As of March 31, 2020, there was approximately $305,000 of unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested Stock Awards.

RSUs ~~with a grant date fair value of $19.38. The RSUs will~~ vest ~~pro rata~~pro-rata over 3 years subject to achievement of certain established performance metrics. The ultimate number of RSUs earned, if any, will depend on the performance ~~measured.~~measured over each annual period during the applicable 3-year performance period. If performance measures are achieved, the RSUs ~~vesting may be more or less than~~will vest on the ~~target award. The award could be~~date of certification of performance achievement by the Compensation Committee following each annual performance period. On March 19, 2020, the Compensation Committee determined that the applicable performance metrics were achieved at 138% of target. Awards of RSUs are settled in cash orunless the recipient timely elects for the RSUs to be settled in shares of common stock. The RSUs are recorded as a liability by the Company.

(8) Benefit Plans

The Bank has a 401(k) plan that covers substantially all employees with six months or more of service. The Bank’s 401(k) plan permits all eligible employees to make contributions to the plan up to the IRS salary deferral limit. The Bank’s contributions to the 401(k) plan are expensed as incurred.

The Company also provides retirement benefits to certain employees under supplemental executive retirement plans. The plans are unfunded and the Company accrues actuarially determined benefit costs over the estimated service period of the employees in the plans. The Company recognizes the over-funded or under-funded status of a defined benefit post-retirement plan as an asset or liability

on its balance sheet and recognizes changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. At ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer was the only eligible participant in the supplemental executive retirement plans.

In connection with the benefit plans, the Bank has life insurance policies on the lives of its executive officers, directors and certain employees. The Bank is the owner and beneficiary of these policies. The cash surrender values of these policies totaled approximately ~~$29.1~~$36.9 million and ~~$28.7~~$36.7 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively.

The components of net periodic expense for the Company’s supplemental executive retirement plans for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ were as follows:


	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,						Three Months Ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2019			2018			2019			2018			2020			2019
Service cost	$	48		$	53		$	142		$	140		$	47		$	47
Interest cost	40			43			122			114			41			41
Actuarial gain recognized	(44		)	(15		)	(132		)	(45		)	(44		)	(44		)
Total	$	44		$	81		$	132		$	209		$	44		$	44

(9) Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) and Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Other comprehensive income (loss) is the total of (1) net income (loss) and (2) all other changes in equity from non-shareholder sources, which are referred to as other comprehensive income (loss). The components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), and the related tax effects, are as follows:


	September 30, 2019									March 31, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)	Before-Tax Amount			Income Tax Effect			Net-of-Tax Amount			Before-Tax Amount			Income Tax Effect			Net-of-Tax Amount
Net unrealized holding gains on investment securities available for sale	$	408		$	(106	)	$	302		$	226		$	(65	)	$	161
Unrealized impairment loss on held to maturity security	(495		)	118			(377		)	(489		)	117			(372		)
Gains on unfunded pension liability	353			(99		)	254			376			(106		)	270
Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	266		$	(87	)	$	179		$	113		$	(54	)	$	59


	December 31, 2018									December 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	Before-Tax Amount			Income Tax Effect			Net-of-Tax Amount			Before-Tax Amount			Income Tax Effect			Net-of-Tax Amount
Net unrealized holding losses on investment securities available for sale	$	(2,207	)	$	528		$	(1,679	)
Net unrealized holding gains on investment securities available for sale										$	414		$	(111	)	$	303
Unrealized impairment loss on held to maturity security	(501		)	119			(382		)	(492		)	118			(374		)
Gains on unfunded pension liability	318			(90		)	228			364			(102		)	262
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	$	(2,390	)	$	557		$	(1,833	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income										$	286		$	(95	)	$	191

Changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) are as follows and are presented net of tax for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

(Dollars in thousands) Unrealized
Holding
Gains
(Losses) on
Available for Sale
Securities Unrealized
Impairment
Loss on
Held to Maturity
Security Unfunded
Pension
Liability Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Balance - July 1, 2019 $ 162
$ (379 ) $ 246
$ 29
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications 152
—
38
190
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income —
2
(30 ) (28 )
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in income (12 ) —
—
(12 )
Other comprehensive income 140
2
8
150
Balance - September 30, 2019 $ 302
$ (377 ) $ 254
$ 179

Balance - July 1, 2018 $ (1,587 ) $ (382 ) $ 122
$ (1,847 )
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications (387 ) —
64
(323 )
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income —
—
(11 ) (11 )
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in income —
—
—
—
Other comprehensive income (loss) (387 ) —
53
(334 )
Balance - September 30, 2018 $ (1,974 ) $ (382 ) $ 175
$ (2,181 )


(Dollars in thousands)	Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) on Available for Sale Securities			Unrealized Impairment Loss on Held to Maturity Security			Unfunded Pension Liability			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Unrealized Holding Gains (Losses) on Available for Sale Securities			Unrealized Impairment Loss on Held to Maturity Security			Unfunded Pension Liability			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance - January 1, 2020													$	303		$	(374	)	$	262		$	191
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications													(141		)	—			39			(102		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income													—			2			(31		)	(29		)
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in income													(1		)	—			—			(1		)
Other comprehensive (loss) income													(142		)	2			8			(132		)
Balance - March 31, 2020													$	161		$	(372	)	$	270		$	59

Balance - January 1, 2019	$	(1,679	)	$	(382	)	$	228		$	(1,833	)	$	(1,679	)	$	(382	)	$	228		$	(1,833	)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications	1,993			—			118			2,111			1,071			—			38			1,109
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	—			5			(92		)	(87		)	—			1			(31		)	(30		)
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in income	(12		)	—			—			(12		)
Other comprehensive income	1,981			5			26			2,012			1,071			1			7			1,079
Balance - September 30, 2019	$	302		$	(377	)	$	254		$	179

Balance - January 1, 2018	$	(434	)	$	(382	)	$	80		$	(736	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications	(1,531		)	—			128			(1,403		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income	—			—			(33		)	(33		)
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in income	(9		)	—			—			(9		)
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(1,540		)	—			95			(1,445		)
Balance - September 30, 2018	$	(1,974	)	$	(382	)	$	175		$	(2,181	)
Balance - March 31, 2019													$	(608	)	$	(381	)	$	235		$	(754	)

(10) Recent Accounting Pronouncements

ASU ~~2018-15 - Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40)~~

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement,” to help entities evaluate the accounting for fees paid by a customer in a cloud computing arrangement (hosting arrangement) by providing guidance for determining when the arrangement includes a software license.

This ASU aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software (and hosting arrangements that include an internal use software license). The accounting for the service element of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract is not affected by the amendments in this ASU.

This ASU also requires the entity (customer) to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement that is a service contract over the term of the hosting arrangement. The term of the hosting arrangement includes the non-cancellable period of the arrangement plus periods covered by (1) an option to extend the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain to exercise that option, (2) an option to terminate the arrangement if the customer is reasonably certain not to exercise the termination option, and (3) an option to extend (or not to terminate) the arrangement in which exercise of the option is in the control of the vendor. The entity also is required to apply the existing impairment guidance in Subtopic 350-40 to the capitalized implementation costs as if the costs were long-lived assets.

The amendments in this ASU also require the entity to present the expense related to the capitalized implementation costs in the same line item in the statement of income as the fees associated with the hosting element (service) of the arrangement and classify payments for capitalized implementation costs in the statement of cash flows in the same manner as payments made for fees associated with the hosting element. The entity is also required to present the capitalized implementation costs in the consolidated balance sheets in the same line item that a prepayment for the fees of the associated hosting arrangement would be presented.

~~The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact, if any, of adopting this ASU on its financial statements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019.~~

~~ASU 2018-14 Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20)~~

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-14 - “Compensation - Retirement Benefits - Defined Benefit Plans - General (Subtopic 715-20),” which consists of amendments to the disclosure framework project to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to the financial statements. This ASU modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement plans.

The amendments in this ASU remove disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, clarify the specific requirements of disclosures and add disclosure requirements identified as relevant. Although narrow in scope, the amendments are considered an important part of the FASB’s efforts to improve the effectiveness of disclosures in the notes to financial statements by applying concepts in the Concepts Statement.

~~The following disclosure requirements were removed from Subtopic 715-20:~~

1.~~The amounts in accumulated other comprehensive income expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year;~~

2.~~The amount and timing of plan assets expected to be returned to the employer;~~

3.~~The disclosures related to the June 2001 amendments to the Japanese Welfare Pension Insurance Law;~~

4.~~Related party disclosures about the amount of future annual benefits covered by insurance and annuity contracts and significant transactions between the employer or related parties and the plan;~~

5.For nonpublic entities, the reconciliation of the opening balances to the closing balances of plan assets measured on a recurring basis in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. However, nonpublic entities will be required to disclose separately the amounts of transfers into and out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and purchases of Level 3 plan assets; and

6.For public entities, the effects of a one-percentage point change in assumed health care cost trend rates on the (a) aggregate of the service and interest cost components of net periodic benefit costs and (b) benefit obligation for postretirement health care benefits.

~~The following disclosure requirements were added to Subtopic 715-20:~~

1.~~The weighted-average interest crediting rates for cash balance plans and other plans with promised interest crediting rates;~~

~~and~~

2.~~An explanation of the reasons for significant gains and losses related to changes in the benefit obligation for the period.~~

~~This ASU also clarifies that the following information for defined benefit pension plans should be disclosed:~~

1.~~The projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) and fair value of plan assets for plans with PBOs in excess of plan assets; and~~

2.~~The accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”) and fair value of plan assets for plans with ABOs in excess of plan assets.~~

For the Company, the provisions of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company does not expect the adoption of this guidance to have a material impact on the disclosures in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~ASU Update~~ 2016-13 - Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments

In June 2016, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~ASU~~Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2016-13 ~~“Financial~~"Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments,”" which requires credit losses on most financial assets to be measured at amortized cost and certain other instruments to be measured using an expected credit loss model (referred to as the current expected credit loss ~~“CECL”~~(CECL) model).

Under this model, entities will estimate credit losses over the entire contractual term of the instrument (considering estimated prepayments but not expected extensions or modifications unless reasonable expectation of a troubled debt restructuring exists) from the date of initial recognition of that instrument.

The ASU also replaces the current accounting model for purchased credit impaired loans and debt securities. The allowance for credit losses for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination (“("PCD ~~assets”~~assets") should be determined in a similar manner to other financial assets measured on an amortized cost basis. Upon initial recognition, the allowance for credit losses is added to the purchase price (“("gross up ~~approach”~~approach") to determine the initial amortized cost basis. The subsequent accounting for PCD assets will use the CECL model described above.

The ASU made certain targeted amendments to the existing impairment model for available-for-sale (AFS) debt securities. For an AFS debt security for which there is neither the intent nor a more-likely-than-not requirement to sell, an entity will record credit losses as an allowance rather than a write-down of the amortized cost basis.

For the Company, the provisions of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, ~~2019,~~2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities as of the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years.

~~In 2019,~~The Company has completed the ~~FASB issued~~initial analysis of its financial assets and will continue to build and validate the ~~following guidance related~~CECL models in 2020 to ~~ASU 2016-13-Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326):~~evaluate the impact of the adoption of the new standard on its consolidated financial statements.

•

In April 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses,

Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instruments. The amendments in this ASU make minor

improvements to the Codification by eliminating certain inconsistencies and clarifying the current guidance.

•In June 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326): Targeted Transition Relief.

This ASU provides optional targeted transition relief that allows reporting entities to irrevocably elect the fair value option

on financial instruments that 1) were previously recorded at amortized cost and 2) are within the scope of Topic 326 if the

instruments are eligible for the fair value option under Topic 825. The new guidance is effective for public companies for

annual reporting periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019.

~~The Company has completed~~In November 2019, the ~~initial analysis of its financial assets~~FASB issued ASU No. 2019-10, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and ~~is building~~Hedging (Topic 815), and ~~validating~~Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2019-10 provides that the CECL models in 2019. During the second quarter of 2019, preliminary testing of the CECL model was conducted utilizing the December 31, 2018 and March 31, 2019 loan portfolios. During the third quarter of 2019, management continued to review the CECL model methodology and assumptions. During the fourth quarter of 2019, testing will be conducted utilizing the September 30, 2019 loan portfolio. The Company is validating the results and continuing to refine the methodology and assumptions. The Company is also evaluating the potential impact, if any, of adopting ASU 2019-05 and ASU 2019-04 on its consolidated financial statements along withFASB’s recently developed philosophy regarding the implementation of effective dates applies to ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326), among other ASUs. For the Company, the provisions of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities as of the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. See the discussions regarding the adoption of ASU 2016-13 above.

Also in November 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-11, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Codification Improvements (Topic 326)” to clarify its new credit impairment guidance in ASC 326, based on implementation issues raised by stakeholders. ASU 2019-11 clarifies that expected recoveries are to be included in the allowance for credit losses for these financial assets; an accounting policy election can be made to adjust the effective interest rate for existing troubled debt restructurings based on the prepayment assumptions instead of the prepayment assumptions applicable immediately prior to the restructuring event; and extends the practical expedient to exclude accrued interest receivable from all additional relevant disclosures involving the amortized cost basis. For the Company, the provisions of this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for all entities as of the fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. See the discussions regarding the adoption of ASU 2016-13 above.

ASU Update 2020-02 - Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) and Leases (Topic 842)

In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-02, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326) and Leases (Topic 842): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 119 and Update to SEC Section on Effective Date Related to Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).” This ASU adds and amends SEC paragraphs in the Accounting Standards Codification to reflect the issuance of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 119, related to the new credit losses standard, and comments by the SEC staff related to the revised effective date of the new leases standard. This ASU is effective upon issuance. See the discussion regarding the adoption of ASU 2016-13 above.

ASU Update 2020-03 - Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No. 2020-3, “Codification Improvements to Financial Instruments.” This ASU clarifies various financial instruments topics, including the CECL standard issued in 2016. Amendments related to ASU 2016-13 for entities that have not yet adopted that guidance are effective upon adoption of the amendments in ASU 2016-13. Early adoption is not permitted before an entity’s adoption of ASU 2016-13. Other amendments are effective upon issuance of this ASU. See the discussion regarding the adoption of ASU 2016-13 above.

(11) Fair Value Disclosures

U.S. GAAP has established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation methods used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:


Level 1:	Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities.


Level 2:	Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.


Level 3:	Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported with little or no market activity).

An asset’s or liability’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below. These valuation methodologies were applied to all of the Company’s financial assets and financial liabilities carried at fair value.

In general, fair value is based upon quoted market prices, where available. If such quoted market prices are not available, fair value is based upon models that primarily use, as inputs, observable market-based parameters. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments may include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and counterparty creditworthiness, among other things, as well as unobservable parameters. Any such valuation adjustments are applied consistently over time. The Company’s valuation methodologies may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future values. While management believes the Company’s valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting date.

Securities Available for Sale. Securities classified as available for sale are reported at fair value utilizing Level 1 and Level 2 inputs. For Level 2 securities, the fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows,

the U.S. Treasury yield curve, live trading levels, trade execution data, market consensus prepayments speeds, credit information and the security’s terms and conditions, among other things.

Interest Rate Lock Derivatives. Interest rate lock commitments do not trade in active markets with readily observable prices. The fair value of an interest rate lock commitment is estimated based upon the forward sales price that is obtained in the best efforts commitment at the time the borrower locks in the interest rate on the loan and the probability that the locked rate commitment will close.

Impaired Loans. Impaired loans are those which the Company has measured and recognized impairment, generally based on the fair value of the loan’s collateral. Fair value is generally determined based upon independent third-party appraisals of the collateral or discounted cash flows based on the expected proceeds. These assets are included as Level 3 fair values, based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurements. The fair value consists of the loan balances less specific valuation allowances.

Other Real Estate Owned. Foreclosed properties are adjusted to fair value less estimated selling costs at the time of foreclosure in preparation for transfer from portfolio loans to other real estate owned (“OREO”), thereby establishing a new accounting basis. The Company subsequently adjusts the fair value of the OREO, utilizing Level 3 inputs on a non-recurring basis to reflect partial write-downs based on the observable market price, current appraised value of the asset or other estimates of fair value. The fair value of other real estate owned is determined using appraisals, which may be discounted based on management’s review and changes in market conditions.

The following table summarizes financial assets and financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:


	September 30, 2019								March 31, 2020
(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities (“GSE”) and agencies	$	—	$	2,000	$	—	$	2,000	$	—	$	3,952	$	—	$	3,952
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations - GSE	—		50,463		—		50,463		—		47,770		—		47,770
Residential mortgage backed securities - GSE	—		14,423		—		14,423		—		19,847		—		19,847
Obligations of state and political subdivisions	—		19,468		—		19,468		—		35,577		—		35,577
Trust preferred debt securities - single issuer	—		1,389		—		1,389		—		1,263		—		1,263
Corporate debt securities	7,969		15,147		—		23,116		11,808		14,002		—		25,810
Other debt securities	—		24,225		—		24,225		—		29,506		—		29,506
Interest rate lock derivative									—		359		—		359
Total	$	7,969	$	127,115	$	—	$	135,084	$	11,808	$	152,276	$	—	$	164,084


	December 31, 2018								December 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value
Securities available for sale:
U.S. Treasury securities and obligations of U.S. Government sponsored entities (“GSE”) and agencies	$	—	$	2,952	$	—	$	2,952	$	—	$	764	$	—	$	764
Residential collateralized mortgage obligations - GSE	—		48,183		—		48,183		��		53,175		—		53,175
Residential mortgage backed securities - GSE	—		13,882		—		13,882		—		18,387		—		18,387
Obligations of state and political subdivisions	—		23,342		—		23,342		—		33,519		—		33,519
Trust preferred debt securities - single issuer	—		1,329		—		1,329		—		1,442		—		1,442
Corporate debt securities	16,388		10,898		—		27,286		11,151		12,128		—		23,279
Other debt securities	—		15,248		—		15,248		—		25,216		—		25,216
Interest rate lock derivative									—		159		—		159
Total	$	16,388	$	115,834	$	—	$	132,222	$	11,151	$	144,790	$	—	$	155,941

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). Assets and liabilities subject to fair value adjustments (impairment) on a nonrecurring basis at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 were as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value		Level 1 Inputs		Level 2 Inputs		Level 3 Inputs		Total Fair Value
September 30, 2019
March 31, 2020
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	7,347	$	7,347	$	—	$	—	$	4,180	$	4,180
Other real estate owned	—		—		1,460		1,460		—		—		93		93
December 31, 2018
December 31, 2019
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	6,857	$	6,857	$	—	$	—	$	7,092	$	7,092
Other real estate owned	—		—		1,460		1,460		—		—		93		93

Impaired loans measured at fair value and included in the above table at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 consisted of 126 loans having an aggregate recorded investment of ~~$7.4~~$4.3 million and specific loan loss allowance of ~~$72,000.~~$91,000. Impaired loans measured at fair value and included in the above table at December 31, ~~2018~~2019 consisted of 812 loans having an aggregate balance of ~~$7.3~~$7.2 million with specific loan loss allowance of ~~$453,000.~~$69,000.

The following table presents additional qualitative information about assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, where there was evidence of impairment, and for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value:


(Dollars in thousands)	Fair Value Estimate		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)	Fair Value Estimate		Valuation Techniques	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
September 30, 2019
March 31, 2020
Impaired loans	$	7,347	Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾	Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾	0.5% - 23.1% (8.41%)	$	4,180	Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾	Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾	0.1% - 40.4% (12.6%)
Other real estate owned	$	1,460	Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾	Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾	47% - 80% (63.5%)	$	93	Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾	Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾	47.0% (47.0%)
December 31, 2018
December 31, 2019
Impaired loans	$	6,857	Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾	Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾	5% - 23% (10.6%)	$	7,092	Appraisal of collateral ⁽¹⁾	Appraisal adjustments ⁽²⁾	0.1% - 40.4% (12.6%)
Other real estate owned	$	1,460	Appraisal of collateral⁽¹⁾	Appraisal adjustments⁽²⁾	47% - 80% (63.5%)	$	93	Appraisal of collateral⁽¹⁾	Appraisal adjustments⁽²⁾	47.0% (47.0%)


⁽¹⁾	Fair value is generally determined through independent appraisals of the underlying collateral, which generally include various Level 3 inputs that are not identifiable.


⁽²⁾	Includes qualitative adjustments by management and estimated liquidation expenses.

The following is a summary of fair value versus carrying value of all of the Company’s financial instruments. For the Company and the Bank, as with most financial institutions, the bulk of assets and liabilities are considered financial instruments. Many of the financial instruments lack an available trading market as characterized by a willing buyer and willing seller engaging in an exchange transaction. Therefore, significant estimations and present value calculations were used for the purpose of this note. Changes in assumptions could significantly affect these estimates.

The estimated fair values and carrying amounts of financial assets and liabilities as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 were as follows:


	September 30, 2019													March 31, 2020
	Carrying			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Fair			Carrying			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	Value			Inputs		Inputs			Inputs		Value			Value			Inputs		Inputs			Inputs		Value
Cash and cash equivalents	$	20,756		$	20,756	$	—		$	—	$	20,756		$	12,039		$	12,039	$	—		$	—	$	12,039
Securities available for sale	135,084			7,969		127,115			—		135,084			163,725			11,808		151,917			—		163,725
Securities held to maturity	74,909			—		76,763			—		76,763			88,381			—		91,138			—		91,138
Loans held for sale	6,738			—		6,914			—		6,914			11,755			—		12,100			—		12,100
Loans, net	1,016,054			—		—			1,037,897		1,037,897
Net loans														1,207,806			—		—			1,222,317		1,222,317
SBA servicing asset	982			—		1,490			—		1,490			902			—		1,245			—		1,245
Interest rate lock derivative	273			—		273			—		273			359			—		359			—		359
Accrued interest receivable	3,652			—		3,652			—		3,652			4,843			—		4,843			—		4,843
FHLB stock	5,991			—		5,991			—		5,991			5,214			—		5,214			—		5,214
Deposits	(1,023,059		)	—		(1,023,690		)	—		(1,023,690		)	(1,298,032		)	—		(1,301,168		)	—		(1,301,168		)
Borrowings	(137,800		)	—		(137,800		)	—		(137,800		)
Short-term borrowings														(94,125		)	—		(94,125		)	—		(94,125		)
Redeemable subordinated debentures	(18,557		)	—		(12,850		)	—		(12,850		)	(18,557		)	—		(12,441		)	—		(12,441		)
Accrued interest payable	(1,602		)	—		(1,602		)	—		(1,602		)	(1,430		)	—		(1,430		)	—		(1,430		)


	December 31, 2018													December 31, 2019
	Carrying			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Fair			Carrying			Level 1		Level 2			Level 3		Fair
(Dollars in thousands)	Value			Inputs		Inputs			Inputs		Value			Value			Inputs		Inputs			Inputs		Value
Cash and cash equivalents	$	16,844		$	16,844	$	—		$	—	$	16,844		$	14,842		$	14,842	$	—		$	—	$	14,842
Securities available for sale	132,222			16,388		115,834			—		132,222			155,782			11,151		144,631			—		155,782
Securities held to maturity	79,572			—		80,204			—		80,204			76,620			—		78,223			—		78,223
Loans held for sale	3,020			—		3,141			—		3,141			5,927			—		6,093			—		6,093
Loans, net	874,762			—		—			874,742		874,742
Net loans														1,206,757			—		—			1,243,088		1,243,088
SBA servicing asset	991			—		1,490			—		1,490			930			—		1,245			—		1,245
Interest rate lock derivative	79			—		79			—		79			159			—		159			—		159
Accrued interest receivable	3,860			—		3,860			—		3,860			4,945			—		4,945			—		4,945
FHLB stock	3,929			—		3,929			—		3,929			4,176			—		4,176			—		4,176
Deposits	(950,672		)	—		(949,813		)	—		(949,813		)	(1,277,362		)	—		(1,278,166		)	—		(1,278,166		)
Borrowings	(71,775		)	—		(71,775		)	—		(71,775		)
Short-term borrowings														(92,050		)	—		(92,050		)	—		(92,050		)
Redeemable subordinated debentures	(18,557		)	—		(12,774		)	—		(12,774		)	(18,557		)	—		(12,837		)	—		(12,837		)
Accrued interest payable	(1,228		)	—		(1,228		)	—		(1,228		)	(1,592		)	—		(1,592		)	—		(1,592		)

Loan commitments and standby letters of credit as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018~~2019 were based on fees charged for similar agreements; accordingly, the estimated fair value of loan commitments and standby letters of credit was nominal.

(12) Leases

At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the Company had 3037 operating leases under which the Company is a lessee. Of the 3037 leases, 1623 leases were for real property, including leases for 1319 of the Company’s branch offices and 34 leases for general office space including the Company’s headquarters. All of the real property leases include one or more options to extend the lease term. NaN of the branch office leases are for the land on which the branch offices are located and the Company owns the leasehold improvements.

In addition, the Company had 1312 leases for office equipment, which are primarily copiers and printers and 12 automobile lease. None of these leases include extensions and generally have three to five year terms.

The Company does not have any finance leases.

During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ the Company recognized rent and equipment expense associated with leases as follows:


(In thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019
Operating lease cost:
Fixed rent expense	$	501	$	523	$	1,477	$	1,441
Variable rent expense	—		—		—		—
Fixed rent expense and equipment expense									$	667	$	484
Short-term lease expense	3		—		7		—		12		2
Sublease income	—		—		—		—
Net lease cost	$	504	$	523	$	1,484	$	1,441	$	679	$	486


(In thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,				Three Months Ended March 31,
	2019		2018		2019		2018		2020		2019
Lease cost - occupancy expense	$	438	$	458	$	1,295	$	1,252	$	614	$	427
Lease cost - other expense	66		65		189		189		65		59
Net lease cost	$	504	$	523	$	1,484	$	1,441	$	679	$	486

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019, ~~and 2018,~~ the following cash and non-cash activities were associated with the leases:

Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In thousands) 2019 2018
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases $ 1,332
$ 1,441

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Additions to ROU assets obtained from:
Net lease cost —
—
New operating lease liabilities 417
—



	Three Months Ended March 31,
(In thousands)	2020		2019
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities:
Operating cash flows from operating leases	$	630	$	433

Non-cash investing and financing activities:
Additions to ROU assets obtained from:
New operating lease liabilities	—		60

The future payments due under operating leases at ~~September 30,~~March 31, 2020 and 2019 ~~and 2018~~ were as follows:


	At September 30,				At March 31,
(In thousands)	2019		2018		2020			2019
Due in less than one year	$	1,841	$	1,426	$	2,065		$	1,778
Due in one year but less than two years	1,796		1,282		2,033			1,762
Due in two years but less than three years	1,784		1,067		2,018			1,730
Due in three years but less than four years	1,767		851		1,969			1,719
Due in four years but less than five years	1,644		659		1,802			1,673
Thereafter	12,483		1,824		14,673			12,988
Total	$	21,315	$	7,109
Total future payments					$	24,560		$	21,650
Less: Implied interest					(6,303		)	(5,738		)
Total lease liability					$	18,257		$	15,912

As of ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, future payments due under operating leases were based on ASC Topic 842 and included, in general, at least one lease renewal option on all real estate leases except on one land lease where all renewal options were included. ~~As of September 30, 2018, the minimum future payments were disclosed as required by ASC Topic 840 and do not include future rent related to renewal options.~~

As of ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the weighted-average remaining lease term for all operating leases is ~~14.7~~15.1 years. The weighted average discount rate associated with the operating leases as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 was 3.43%.

~~(13)Subsequent Event~~

On November 8, 2019, at 5:01 p.m., the Company and the Bank completed the merger of Shore Community Bank ( “Shore”) with and into the Bank with the Bank being the surviving entity (the “Shore Merger”). Under the terms of the merger agreement governing the Shore Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), Shore shareholders received an aggregate of 1,509,275 shares of the Company's common stock and an aggregate of approximately $24,233,385 in cash, which does not include cash in lieu of fractional shares. The Company now has, including the shares issued in connection with the Shore Merger, 10,191,676 shares of common stock outstanding.

Shore was headquartered in Toms River, New Jersey, and served its customers and communities through 5 full-service banking offices in Toms River (3), Jackson and Manahawkin, New Jersey. Shore had assets of $286 million, loans of $210 million and deposits of $250 million as of September 30, 2019. As a result of the Merger, the Company, on a consolidated basis, anticipates having approximately $1.6 billion in assets, $1.2 billion of loans and $1.3 billion of deposits, with 26 full-service banking offices located in Bergen, Middlesex, Monmouth, Mercer, Ocean and Somerset counties, New Jersey.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

When used in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three-month period ended March 31, 2020 (this “Form 10-Q”), the words “the Company,” “we,” “our,” and “us” refer to 1ST Constitution Bancorp and, as the context requires, its wholly-owned subsidiary, 1ST Constitution Bank (the “Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, 1ST Constitution Investment Company of New Jersey, Inc., FCB Assets Holdings, Inc., 204 South Newman Street Corp. and 249 New York Avenue, LLC. 1ST Constitution Capital Trust II (“Trust II”), a subsidiary of the Company, is not included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as it is a variable interest entity and the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Trust II, a subsidiary of the Company, was created in May 2006 to issue trust preferred securities to assist the Company in raising additional capital.

This discussion and analysis of the operating results for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and financial condition at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 is intended to help readers analyze the accompanying financial statements, notes and other supplemental information contained in this ~~Quarterly Report on~~ Form ~~10-Q for the three- and nine-month period ended September 30, 2019 (this “Form 10-Q”).~~10-Q. Results of operations for the ~~three- and nine-month periods~~three-month period ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 are not necessarily indicative of results to be attained for any other periods.

This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements, notes and tables included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Form 10-K (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation) for the year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March ~~15, 2019.~~

~~General~~16, 2020.

~~Throughout the following sections, the “Company” refers to 1~~^ST ~~Constitution Bancorp and, as the context requires, its wholly-owned subsidiary, 1~~^ST ~~Constitution Bank (the “Bank”), and the Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, 1~~^ST ~~Constitution Investment Company of New Jersey, Inc., FCB Assets Holdings, Inc., 204 South Newman Street Corp. and 249 New York Avenue, LLC. 1~~^ST Constitution Capital Trust II (“Trust II”), a subsidiary of the Company, is not included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as it is a variable interest entity and the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Trust II, a subsidiary of the Company, was created in May 2006 to issue trust preferred securities to assist the Company in raising additional capital.

The Company is a bank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended. The Company was organized under the laws of the State of New Jersey in February 1999 for the purpose of acquiring all of the issued and outstanding stock of the Bank, a full-service commercial bank that began operations in August 1989, thereby enabling the Bank to operate within a bank holding company structure. The Company became an active bank holding company on July 1, 1999. Other than its ownership interest in the Bank, the Company currently conducts no other significant business activities.

~~The Bank operates 21 branches and manages an investment portfolio through its subsidiary, 1~~^ST ~~Constitution Investment Company of New Jersey, Inc. FCB Assets Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of the Bank, is used by the Bank to manage and dispose of repossessed real estate.~~

On June 23, 2019, the Company and the Bank entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Shore Community Bank (“Shore”), providing for the merger of Shore with and into the Bank, with the Bank as the surviving entity (the “Shore Merger”). The Shore Merger became effective at 5:01 p.m. on November 8, 2019. The material terms of the Merger Agreement and the Shore Merger were disclosed on a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 25, 2019.

On April 11, 2018, the Company and the Bank completed the merger of New Jersey Community Bank (“NJCB”) with and into the Bank (the NJCB Merger"). See Note 2 - Acquisition of New Jersey Community Bank - for further information.

~~When used in this Form 10-Q , the words “the Company,” “we,~~” ~~“our,~~” ~~and “us” refer to 1~~^ST ~~Constitution Bancorp and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, unless we indicate otherwise.~~

Forward-Looking Statements

This ~~report~~Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a “safe harbor” for forward-looking statements. When used in this and in future filings by the Company with the SEC, and in the Company’s ~~press releases~~written and in oral statements made with the approval of an authorized executive officer of the Company, the words or phrases “will,” “will likely result,” “could,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “continues,” “expects,” “plans,” “will continue,” “is anticipated,” “estimated,” “project” or “outlook” or similar expressions (including confirmations by an authorized executive officer of the Company of any such expressions made by a third party with respect to the Company) are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, each of which speaks only as of the date made. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical earnings and those presently anticipated or projected.

~~Factors~~These forward-looking statements are based upon our opinions and estimates as of the date they are made and are not guarantees of future performance. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may be beyond our control, which could cause actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from results, performance and achievements projected, expected, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements.

Examples of factors or events that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those ~~results~~anticipated, expressed or implied include, but are not limited to, those factors listed under “Business”, “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018, which was filed with the SEC on March 15,

~~2019, such as~~without limitation, changes in the ~~direction of the~~overall economy ~~in New Jersey~~ and ~~the New York metropolitan area; changes in the~~ interest rate ~~environment;~~changes; inflation, market and monetary fluctuations; the ability of our customers to repay their obligations; the accuracy of our financial statement estimates and assumptions, including the adequacy of the estimate made in connection with determining the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses; ~~competition;~~increased competition and its effect on the ~~adoption, interpretation~~availability and ~~implementation~~pricing of ~~new~~deposits and loans; significant changes in accounting, tax or ~~pre-existing accounting pronouncements;~~regulatory practices and requirements; changes toin deposit flows, loan demand or ~~new bank~~real estate values; the enactment of legislation or regulatory ~~rules, regulations or~~changes; changes in monetary and fiscal policies that restrict or direct certain actions; risks associated with investments in mortgage-backed securities; continued relationships with major customers, including sources for loans; risks associated with speculative construction lending; risks associated with safeguarding information technology systems; andof the U.S. government; changes to the method ~~by which~~that LIBOR rates are determined and to the potential phasing out of LIBOR after ~~2021. Other~~2021; changes in loan delinquency rates or in our levels of non-performing assets; our ability to declare and pay dividends; changes in the economic climate in the market areas in which we operate; the frequency and magnitude of foreclosure of our loans; changes in consumer spending and saving habits; the effects of the health and soundness of other financial institutions, including the need of the FDIC to increase the Deposit Insurance Fund assessments; technological changes; the effects of climate change and harsh weather conditions, including hurricanes and man-made disasters; the economic impact of any future terrorist threats and attacks, acts of war or threats thereof and the response of the United States to any such threats and attacks; our ability to integrate acquisitions and achieve cost savings; other risks described from time to time in our filings with the SEC; and ~~uncertainties related~~our ability to manage the ~~Shore Merger that could cause actual~~risks involved in the foregoing.

In addition, statements about the potential effects and impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s business, financial condition, liquidity and results ~~to differ from those described above include, but~~of operations may constitute forward-looking statements and are ~~not limited~~subject to the risk that ~~expected cost savings~~actual results may differ, possibly materially, from what is reflected in such forward-looking statements due to factors and ~~synergies from~~future developments that are uncertain, unpredictable and, in many cases, beyond our control, including the ~~Shore Merger may not be realized,~~scope, duration and extent of the pandemic, actions taken by governmental authorities in response to the pandemic and the ~~inability to retain Shore’s~~direct and indirect impact of the pandemic on our employees, customers, business and ~~employees.~~third-parties with which we conduct business. Further, the foregoing factors may be exacerbated by the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, which is unknown at this time. For a discussion of certain COVID-19-related risks, see Part II, Item 1A - Risk Factors of this Form 10-Q.

Although management has taken certain steps to mitigate any negative effect of the aforementioned ~~items,~~factors, significant unfavorable changes could severely impact the assumptions used and ~~could~~ have an adverse effect on profitability. ~~The Company undertakes no~~Any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf speak only as of the date they are made, and we do not undertake any obligation to ~~publicly revise~~update any forward-looking ~~statements~~statement to reflect ~~anticipated or unanticipated~~the impact of subsequent events or circumstances, ~~occurring after the date of such statements,~~ except as required by law.

General

The Bank operates 26 branches and manages its investment portfolio through its subsidiary, 1^ST Constitution Investment Company of New Jersey, Inc. FCB Assets Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of the Bank, is used by the Bank to manage and dispose of repossessed real estate.

On November 8, 2019, the Company and the Bank completed the merger of Shore Community Bank (“Shore”) with and into the Bank (the "Shore Merger"). See Note 2 - Acquisition of Shore Community Bank - for further information.

COVID-19 Impact and Response

The sudden emergence of the COVID-19 global pandemic has created widespread uncertainty, social and economic disruption and highly volatile financial markets. Mandated business and school closures, restrictions on travel and social distancing have resulted in almost all businesses and employees being adversely impacted and a dramatic increase in unemployment levels in a short period of time.

In the first quarter of 2020, the Company did not experience a significant increase in loan delinquencies or down- grades in credit ratings of loans directly related to the pandemic. However, the economic disruption will more severely impact businesses, borrowers and consumers in the second quarter of 2020, which may continue with increasing severity in future periods. Management increased the provision for loan losses in response to the deterioration in the economic operating conditions and higher incurred losses in the loan portfolio. Management may further increase the provision and allowance for loan losses in response to changes in economic conditions and the performance of the loan portfolio in future periods.

In the event that the COVID-19 pandemic continues to disrupt business for a prolonged period of time, the fair value of assets could be negatively impacted, which could result in a combination of valuation impairments on our intangible assets, investments, loans, deferred tax assets and OREO. As a result of the recent emergence of the pandemic and the uncertainty, it is not possible to determine the overall future impact of the pandemic on the Company’s business and the results of operations. However, if the pandemic continues for an extended period of time, there could be a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed into law. Among other things, the CARES ACT provides relief to borrowers, including the option to defer loan payments while not affecting their credit and access to additional credit through the Small Business Administration (“SBA”) Pay Check Protection Program (“PPP”).

In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company has taken the following actions:

To protect our employees and customers we have:

Adjusted branch hours and temporarily closed our branch lobbies, except on an appointment only basis.

Continued to service our customers through drive-up facilities, ATMs and our robust technology capabilities that allow customers to execute transactions and apply for residential mortgage loans through our website www.momentummortgage.com through their mobile devices and computers.

Assigned employees to work remotely where practical.

To support our loan and deposit customers and the communities we serve:

We are working tirelessly to provide access to additional credit and provided forbearance on loan interest and or principal of up to 90 days where management has determined that it is warranted. As of March 31, 2020, $16.6 million of loans were modified to provide deferral of interest and or principal by borrowers up to 90 days. As of April 30, 2020, $77.5 million of commercial loans and $5.2 million of residential mortgage and home equity loans had been modified and the Bank had committed to modify $47.6 million of commercial loans and $446,000 of residential mortgage and home equity loans to provide deferral of interest and or principal by borrowers up to 90 days.

As a long-standing Small Business Administration ("SBA") preferred lender, we are actively participating in the SBA’s PPP program. As of April 30, 2020, we have accepted and funded 162 applications for PPP loans totaling $48.7 million and have 218 SBA approved applications for $23.3 million of PPP loans in process.

As more information becomes available, we intend to evaluate the benefits of utilizing the Main Street New Loan Facility (“Facility”) established by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”) under the CARES Act to provide financing to our customers and communities. This Facility is intended to facilitate lending by banks to small and medium-sized businesses that were not eligible to participate in the PPP.

We are participating in the Federal Reserve's PPP loan funding program and are pledging the PPP loans to collateralize a like amount of borrowings from the Federal Reserve at a favorable interest rate of 0.35% up to a 2 year term.

The spread of COVID-19 and the restrictions implemented to contain its spread did not significantly impact the Company’s financial condition as of March 31, 2020. However, the future impact of the pandemic is highly uncertain and cannot be predicted and there is no assurance that it will not have a material adverse impact on our future results. The extent of the impact will depend on future developments, including further actions taken to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, the extent and severity of the outbreak and the duration of the government mandates and business closures. During the quarter ended March 31, 2020, we did not experience a significant increase in loan delinquencies or downgrades in credit ratings of loans directed related to the pandemic, but we expect the economic disruption will more severely impact the businesses, clients and communities we serve, and therefore our business, in the second quarter of 2020. For a discussion of certain COVID-19-related risks, see Part II, Item 1A – Risk Factors of this Form 10-Q.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 Compared to Three ~~and Nine~~ Months Ended ~~September 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019

Summary

The Company reported net income of ~~$3.6~~$3.4 million and diluted earnings per share of ~~$0.42~~$0.33 for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to net income of ~~$4.0~~$3.4 million and diluted earnings per share of ~~$0.46~~$0.39 for the three months ended September 30, 2018. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the Company reported net income of $10.4 million, or $1.19 per diluted share, compared to net income of $8.7 million, or $1.02 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019.

Return on average total assets and return on average shareholders' equity were ~~1.14%~~0.89% and ~~10.57%~~8.01%, respectively, for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to return on average total assets and return on average shareholders' equity of ~~1.34%~~1.18% and ~~12.89%~~10.75%, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2018. Return on average total assets and return on average shareholders' equity were 1.14% and 10.52%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to return on average total assets and return on average shareholders' equity of 1.03% and 9.94%, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.March 31, 2019. Book ~~value and tangible book~~ value per share ~~were $15.95 and $14.55, respectively,~~was $16.97 at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~$14.77 and $13.34, respectively,~~$16.74 at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

~~On June 23, 2019,~~Management anticipates that the ~~Company~~Company’s results of operations and net income will be impacted in the ~~Bank entered into~~foreseeable future due to the ~~Merger Agreement with Shore. Expenses of $302,000 and $575,000~~economic disruption related to the ~~Shore Merger were incurred~~COVID-19 pandemic.

The provision for loan losses and allowance for loan losses may increase as borrowers continue to be negatively affected by the contraction of economic activity and the dramatic increase in unemployment.

Due to the asset sensitive nature of the Company’s balance sheet, the Federal Reserve’s reduction in the ~~three~~targeted fed funds rate to zero to 0.25% and ~~nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively.~~the concomitant decline in the prime rate to 3.25% in March 2020 will cause a reduction in the average yield of loans tied to the prime rate and the net interest margin and may cause a reduction in net interest income in the second quarter of 2020. The ~~Shore Merger became effective at 5:01 p.m.~~net interest margin will also be impacted by the funding of the PPP loans with a 1.0% interest rate, which will be partially offset by the recognition of the loan fees earned on ~~November 8, 2019. On April 11, 2018,~~these loans. The timing and impact to the ~~Company completed~~net interest margin will be contingent on how quickly and the ~~NJCB Merger. As~~extent to which the PPP loans become grants that are repaid by the SBA over the next two years.

It is expected that residential real estate sales, and therefore the origination and sale of residential mortgages will decline as a result of the ~~NJCB Merger, merger-related~~restrictions implemented to contain the spread of COVID-19, such as mandated business closures and social distancing measures. This in turn, would result in a decrease in non-interest income and lower gains on sales of loans.

A significant increase in non-performing loans could result in increased non-interest expense due to higher expenses for loan collection and recovery costs.

During the first quarter of ~~$2.1 million~~2020, management determined that a triggering event had occurred with respect to goodwill, which required a review of goodwill for impairment. Management completed its review of goodwill and concluded that it was ~~incurred~~more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill exceeded the carrying amount of goodwill at March 31, 2020. Accordingly, goodwill was not impaired at March 31, 2020.

COVID-19 could cause a further and ~~a gain from bargain purchase of $184,000 was recognized~~sustained decline in the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2018.~~Company’s stock price or the occurrence of what management would deem to be a triggering event that could, under certain circumstances, cause us to perform a new goodwill impairment test and could result in an impairment charge being necessary in the future. In the event that the Company concludes that all or a portion of its goodwill is impaired, a non-cash charge for the amount of such impairment would be recorded to earnings. Such a charge would have no impact on tangible capital or regulatory capital.

Adjusted net income is a non-GAAP financial measure, which is net income excluding the after-tax effect of merger-related expense and gain on bargain purchase. Adjusted net income was $3.9 million, or $0.45 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2019 compared to adjusted net income of $4.0 million, or $0.46 per diluted share, for the third quarter of 2018.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, adjusted net income was $10.8 million, or $1.25 per diluted share, compared to adjusted net income of $10.1 million, or $1.18 per diluted share, for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Adjusted net income, adjusted net income per diluted share, adjusted return on average total assets, adjusted return on average shareholders’ equity and tangible book value per share are non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, the Company’s GAAP financial results. Management believes that the presentation of these non-GAAP financial measures of the Company in this Form 10-Q may be helpful to readers in understanding the Company’s financial performance when comparing the Company’s financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018 because these non-GAAP financial measures show the Company’s financial performance excluding the financial impact of the net expenses related to the Shore Merger and the NJCB Merger.

~~The following table reflects the reconciliation of non-GAAP measures for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018.~~

Three months ended Nine months ended
September 30, September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data) 2019 2018 2019 2018
Adjusted net income
Net income $ 3,623
$ 4,011
$ 10,390
$ 8,735
Adjustments:
  Merger-related expense 302
—
575
2,141
  Gain from bargain purchase —
—
—
(184 )
  Income tax effect of adjustments (37 ) —
(119 ) (568 )
Adjusted net income $ 3,888
$ 4,011
$ 10,846
$ 10,124

Adjusted net income per diluted share
Adjusted net income $ 3,888
$ 4,011
$ 10,846
$ 10,124
Diluted shares outstanding 8,722,349
8,678,680
8,698,959
8,565,401
Adjusted net income per diluted share $ 0.45
$ 0.46
$ 1.25
$ 1.18

Adjusted return on average total assets
Adjusted net income $ 3,888
$ 4,011
$ 10,846
$ 10,124
Average assets 1,264,298
1,187,522
1,221,410
1,132,045
Adjusted return on average total assets 1.22 % 1.34 % 1.19 % 1.20 %

Adjusted return on average shareholders' equity
Adjusted net income $ 3,888
$ 4,011
$ 10,846
$ 10,124
Average equity 135,975
123,420
132,079
117,484
Adjusted return on average shareholders' equity 11.34 % 12.89 % 10.98 % 11.52 %

Book value and tangible book value per share
Shareholders' equity $ 138,527
$ 123,774
Less: goodwill and intangible assets 12,165
12,294
Tangible shareholders' equity 126,362
111,480
Shares outstanding 8,682,401
8,404,292
Book value per share $ 15.95
$ 14.73
Tangible book value per share $ 14.55
$ 13.26

~~THIRD~~FIRST QUARTER ~~2019~~2020 HIGHLIGHTS

•Return on average total assets and return on average shareholders’ equity were ~~1.14%~~0.89% and ~~10.57%~~8.01%, respectively.

•Book value per share ~~and tangible book value per share were $15.95 and $14.55, respectively,~~was $16.97 at ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

Net interest income was ~~$11.6~~$12.9 million and ~~the~~ net interest margin was ~~3.91%~~3.68% on a tax equivalent basis.

A provision for loan losses of ~~$350,000~~$895,000 and net charge-offs of ~~$14,000~~$165,000 were recorded.

Total loans were ~~$1.0~~$1.2 billion at ~~September 30, 2019, an increase of $141.9 million from December~~March 31, ~~2018.~~

~~The total of commercial~~2020. Commercial business, commercial real estate and construction loans totaled $872.6 million, and increased ~~$36.2~~$16.7 million ~~or 5.5%, to $694.6 million, compared to $658.4 million at~~from December 31, ~~2018, and increased $68.0 million, or 10.9%, compared to $626.6 million at September 30, 2018.~~

~~Mortgage~~2019. During the first quarter of 2020, mortgage warehouse loans ~~increased $98.5~~declined $11.9 million ~~during the first nine months of 2019~~ to ~~$252.7~~$224.8 million, reflecting the seasonal nature of residential lending in the Bank's ~~markets~~markets.

Total deposits were $1.3 billion at March 31, 2020 and ~~the~~ increased ~~level of refinancing activity of residential mortgages.~~$20.7 million from $1.28 billion at December 31, 2019.

Non-performing assets ~~declined $2.4~~increased $8.6 million to ~~$6.7~~$13.7 million, or ~~0.50%~~0.85% of total assets, and included ~~$1.5 million~~$470,000 of OREO at ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

Earnings Analysis

The Company’s results of operations depend primarily on net interest income, which is primarily affected by the market interest rate environment, the shape of the U.S. Treasury yield curve and the difference between the yield on interest-earning assets and the rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities. Other factors that may affect the Company’s operating results are general and local economic and competitive conditions, government policies and actions of regulatory authorities.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income, the Company’s largest and most significant component of operating income, is the difference between interest and fees earned on loans and other earning assets and interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. This component represented ~~83.9%~~84.0% of the Company’s net revenues (defined as net interest income plus non-interest income) for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~84.1%~~85.7% of net revenues for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. Net interest income also depends upon the relative amount of average interest-earning assets, average interest-bearing liabilities and the interest rate earned or paid on them, respectively.

On January 1, 2018 the prime rate was 4.50% and increased 0.25% in each quarter of 2018. The prime rate was 5.00% throughout most of the third quarter and was 5.25% at the end of September 2018. In December the prime rate increased to 5.50% and was 5.50% on December 31, 2018. During 2019, the prime rate was unchanged at 5.50% from the beginning of the year to July 31 until the Federal Reserve reduced the targeted federal funds rate to a range of 2.00% to 2.25% and the prime rate declined to 5.25%. On September 18, 2019, the Federal Reserve reduced the targeted federal funds rate to a range of 1.75% to 2.00% and the prime rate declined to 5.00%.

In general, mortgage warehouse lines, construction loans, commercial business loans that are lines of credit and loans to individuals that are home equity lines of credit have interest rates that are indexed to the prime rate. The interest rate earned on these loans adjusts based on changes in the prime rate.

The following table sets forth the Company’s consolidated average balances of assets and liabilities and shareholders’ equity, as well as interest income and interest expense on related items, and the Company’s average yield or rate for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018.~~2019. The average rates are derived by dividing interest income and interest expense by the average balance of assets and liabilities, respectively.


	Three months ended September 30, 2019							Three months ended September 30, 2018							Three months ended March 31, 2020							Three months ended March 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands except yield/cost information)	Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield		Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield		Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield		Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold/short-term investments	$	6,452		$	35	2.15	%	$	11,953		$	36	1.19	%	$	24,557		$	89	1.46	%	$	8,004		$	47	2.38	%
Investment securities:
Taxable	161,538			1,130		2.80	%	151,115			1,060		2.81	%	168,376			1,056		2.51	%	160,825			1,270		3.16	%
Tax-exempt ⁽¹⁾	52,990			498		3.76	%	73,621			625		3.40	%	65,194			555		3.40	%	59,837			558		3.73	%
Total investment securities	214,528			1,628		3.04	%	224,736			1,685		3.00	%	233,570			1,611		2.76	%	220,662			1,828		3.31	%
Loans: ⁽²⁾
Commercial real estate	405,885			5,295		5.10	%	377,719			4,901		5.08	%	574,640			7,355		5.06	%	390,251			5,011		5.14	%
Mortgage warehouse lines	191,812			2,644		5.39	%	180,430			2,504		5.43	%	175,275			2,035		4.64	%	123,394			1,824		5.91	%
Construction	157,752			2,705		6.80	%	142,365			2,406		6.61	%	147,496			2,179		5.94	%	155,864			2,662		6.93	%
Commercial business	117,465			1,731		5.85	%	106,717			1,496		5.51	%	142,793			1,803		5.08	%	122,878			1,823		6.02	%
Residential real estate	57,026			624		4.38	%	46,777			530		4.53	%	90,360			996		4.36	%	47,274			535		4.53	%
Loans to individuals	20,555			260		4.95	%	24,655			306		4.92	%	30,497			392		5.08	%	22,748			275		4.84	%
Loans held for sale	5,160			49		3.80	%	3,203			38		4.75	%	3,986			35		3.51	%	1,363			17		4.99	%
All other loans	1,222			8		2.56	%	1,061			12		4.43	%	1,803			10		2.19	%	1,013			10		3.95	%
Total loans	956,877			13,316		5.52	%	882,927			12,193		5.41	%	1,166,850			14,805		5.10	%	864,785			12,157		5.70	%
Total interest-earning assets	1,177,857			$	14,979	5.05	%	1,119,616			$	13,914	4.88	%	1,424,977			$	16,505	4.66	%	1,093,451			$	14,032	5.20	%
Non-interest-earning assets:
Allowance for loan losses	(8,786		)					(8,388		)					(9,454		)					(8,535		)
Cash and due from banks	11,684							5,767							13,383							10,479
Other assets	83,543							70,527							122,482							74,307
Total non-interest-earning assets	86,441							67,906							126,411							76,251
Total assets	$	1,264,298						$	1,187,522						$	1,551,388						$	1,169,702
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Money market and NOW accounts	$	335,997		$	720	0.85	%	$	338,783		$	499	0.58	%	$	401,837		$	760	0.76	%	$	334,955		$	574	0.69	%
Savings accounts	190,985			491		1.02	%	194,223			371		0.76	%	265,053			604		0.92	%	189,175			426		0.91	%
Certificates of deposit	291,674			1,693		2.30	%	230,490			984		1.69	%	359,881			1,874		2.09	%	247,735			1,317		2.16	%
Short-term borrowings	45,378			268		2.34	%	63,429			349		2.18	%	18,915			62		1.32	%	26,199			173		2.68	%
Redeemable subordinated debentures	18,557			185		3.99	%	18,557			184		3.97	%	18,557			152		3.24	%	18,557			198		4.27	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	882,591			$	3,357	1.51	%	845,482			$	2,387	1.12	%	1,064,243			$	3,452	1.30	%	816,621			$	2,688	1.33	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits	221,166							211,291							283,520							208,079
Other liabilities	24,566							7,329							31,793							16,798
Total non-interest-bearing liabilities	245,732							218,620							315,313							224,877
Shareholders’ equity	135,975							123,420							171,832							128,204
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,264,298						$	1,187,522						$	1,551,388						$	1,169,702
Net interest spread ⁽³⁾						3.54	%						3.76	%						3.36	%						3.87	%
Net interest income and margin ⁽⁴⁾				$	11,622	3.91	%				$	11,527	4.09	%				$	13,053	3.68	%				$	11,344	4.21	%

⁽¹⁾ Tax equivalent basis, using federal tax rate of 21% in ~~2019~~2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

⁽²⁾ Loan origination fees are considered an adjustment to interest income. For the purpose of calculating loan yields, average loan balances include non-accrual

loans with no related interest income and the average balance of loans held for sale.

⁽³⁾ The net interest spread is the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.

⁽⁴⁾ The net interest margin is equal to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

The following table sets forth the Company’s consolidated average balances of assets and liabilities and shareholders’ equity, as well as interest income and interest expense on related items, and the Company’s average yield or rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018. The average rates are derived by dividing interest income and interest expense by the average balance of assets and liabilities, respectively.

Nine months ended September 30, 2019 Nine months ended September 30, 2018
(Dollars in thousands except yield/cost information) Average
Balance Interest Average
Yield Average
Balance Interest Average
Yield
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold/short-term investments $ 7,140
$ 129
2.42 % $ 21,287
$ 208
1.31 %
Investment securities:
Taxable 162,809
3,615
2.96 % 146,003
2,915
2.66 %
Tax-exempt (1) 56,723
1,590
3.74 % 76,872
1,922
3.33 %
Total investment securities 219,532
5,205
3.16 % 222,875
4,837
2.89 %
Loans: (2)
    Commercial real estate 400,096
15,494
5.11 % 349,423
13,391
5.05 %
    Mortgage warehouse lines 155,962
6,682
5.71 % 157,422
6,318
5.35 %
    Construction 157,245
8,135
6.92 % 135,049
6,548
6.48 %
    Commercial business 120,774
5,386
5.96 % 110,101
4,391
5.33 %
    Residential real estate 50,562
1,682
4.39 % 45,955
1,517
4.35 %
    Loans to individuals 21,748
827
5.01 % 23,386
780
4.40 %
    Loans held for sale 3,556
107
4.01 % 3,067
101
4.39 %
    All other loans 1,032
29
3.71 % 1,132
32
3.73 %
Total loans 910,975
38,342
5.63 % 825,535
33,078
5.31 %
Total interest-earning assets 1,137,647
$ 43,676
5.13 % 1,069,697
$ 38,123
4.73 %
Non-interest-earning assets:
Allowance for loan losses (8,693 ) (8,295 )
Cash and due from banks 11,270
5,782

Other assets 81,186
64,861

Total non-interest-earning assets 83,763
62,348

Total assets $ 1,221,410
$ 1,132,045

Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
   Money market and NOW accounts $ 337,004
$ 1,977
0.78 % $ 362,048
$ 1,437
0.53 %
Savings accounts 190,589
1,380
0.97 % 208,780
1,079
0.69 %
Certificates of deposit 268,851
4,535
2.26 % 180,250
2,026
1.50 %
Short-term borrowings 36,992
698
2.52 % 36,407
576
2.12 %
Redeemable subordinated debentures 18,557
575
4.13 % 18,557
508
3.65 %
Total interest-bearing liabilities 851,993
$ 9,165
1.44 % 806,042
$ 5,626
0.93 %
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits 214,618
199,953

Other liabilities 22,720
8,566

Total non-interest-bearing liabilities 237,338
208,519

Shareholders’ equity 132,079
117,484

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity $ 1,221,410
$ 1,132,045

Net interest spread (3) 3.69 % 3.80 %
Net interest income and margin (4) $ 34,511
4.06 % $ 32,497
4.06 %

⁽¹⁾ ~~Tax equivalent basis, using federal tax rate of 21% in 2019 and 2018.~~

⁽²⁾ ~~Loan origination fees are considered an adjustment to interest income. For the purpose of calculating loan yields, average loan balances include non-accrual~~

~~loans with no related interest income and the average balance of loans held for sale.~~

⁽³⁾ ~~The net interest spread is the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.~~

⁽⁴⁾ ~~The net interest margin is equal to net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.~~

~~Three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to three months ended September 30, 2018~~

Net interest income was ~~$11.5~~$12.9 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2020 and increased $1.7 million compared to net interest income of $11.2 million for the first quarter of 2019. Total interest income was $16.4 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~net interest income of $11.4~~$13.9 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2018. Total~~March 31, 2019. The increase in total interest income was ~~$14.9~~primarily due to a net increase of $302.1 million ~~for the three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $13.8 million for the three months ended September 30, 2018. This increase was due primarily to the $74.0 million increase~~ in average loans, reflecting growth ~~primarily~~in all segments of ~~commercial real estate, mortgage warehouse,~~the loan portfolio except construction ~~and commercial business~~ loans.

The growth in average loans included approximately $207.2 million of loans from the Shore Merger. Average interest-earning assets were ~~$1.18~~$1.4 billion with a tax-equivalent yield of ~~5.05%~~4.66%, for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2019~~2020, compared to ~~$1.12~~average interest-earning assets of $1.1 billion, with a tax-equivalent yield of ~~4.88%~~5.20%, for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~higher~~ yield on average interest-earning assets for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2019 reflected~~2020 declined 54 basis points to 4.66%, primarily due to the ~~higher yield earned on the loan portfolio and the higher percentage of average loans to average earning assets~~sharp decline in market interest rates beginning in the third quarter of 2019 ~~compared to~~and continuing through the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2018.~~

For the third quarter of 2019, the average prime rate was higher than the average prime rate for the third quarter of 2018, and the yields of construction loans, commercial business loans and loans to individuals were higher than for the third quarter of 2018.2020. The yield of mortgage warehouse lines was 5.39% for the third quarter of 2019 compared to 5.43% for the third quarter of 2018. The indexed spread to the prime rate varies by customer and the yield is affected by the prime rate and also the relative mix of loans to mortgage warehouse customers that are outstanding during the period.

Due to the timing of the two decreases in the prime rate in the third quarter of 2019, the 0.50% total decrease had only a partial effect on the average yield of the loans indexed to the prime rate. On October 30, 2019, the Federal Reserve ~~decreased~~reduced the targeted federal funds rate 50 basis points in the third quarter and 25 basis points in the fourth quarter of 2019 and, in response to ~~a range~~the COVID-19 pandemic, further reduced the targeted federal funds rate by 150 basis points in March 2020. The prime rate was 5.50% in the first quarter of ~~1.50% to 1.75% and, as~~2019. As a result of the ~~prime rate declined to 4.75%. Absent any further change~~reductions in the targeted federal funds rate in 2019, the ~~average yield~~prime rate declined to 4.75% in October 2019 and declined further to 3.25% in March 2020. At March 31, 2020, the Bank had approximately $434 million of loans ~~indexed~~with an interest rate tied to the prime rate ~~is expected~~and approximately $51 million of loans with an interest rate tied to either 1- or 3-month LIBOR. The decline in market interest rates and the ~~fourth~~prime rate had a negative effect on the yield of the loan portfolio and investment securities in the first quarter of ~~2019.~~2020.

Interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities was ~~$3.4~~$3.5 million, with an interest cost of ~~1.51%~~1.30%, for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2019~~2020, compared to ~~$2.4~~$2.7 million, with an interest cost of ~~1.12%~~1.33%, for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2018.~~2019. The ~~$1.0 million~~$764,000 increase in interest expense on interest-bearing liabilities for the ~~third~~first quarter of 2020 reflected primarily an increase of $247.6 million in average interest bearing liabilities. The average cost of interest-bearing deposits was 1.27% for the first quarter of 2020 compared to 1.22% for the first quarter of 2019 ~~reflected primarily higher deposit~~and declined from the peak interest ~~rates and higher borrowing interest rates in~~cost for the third quarter of 2019 of 1.41%. The higher interest cost of interest-bearing deposits for the first quarter of 2020 compared to the ~~third~~first quarter of 2019 primarily reflects (i) the rising and higher interest rate environment in 2018, which carried into the first two quarters of 2019, (ii) the lag effect on the interest cost of deposits as market interest rates declined sharply in the first quarter of 2020, (iii) competitive factors for deposits and ~~an increase~~(iv) the term structure of ~~$37.1 million~~certificates of deposit (“CDs”). The interest rates paid on deposits generally do not adjust quickly to sharp changes in market interest rates and decline over time in a falling interest rate environment. The lower level of short-term interest rates in the first quarter of 2020 compared to the first quarter of 2019 resulted in a decline in the interest cost of short-term borrowings and the redeemable subordinated debentures. The growth in average interest-bearing ~~liabilities. The change~~liabilities included average interest-bearing deposits of $176.5 million acquired in the ~~mix of deposits, with~~Shore Merger. Of the total increase in average ~~balance of money market, NOW and savings accounts lower than, and certificates of deposits higher than, in the third quarter of 2018 also~~interest-bearing liabilities, CDs increased ~~the cost of total deposits in the third quarter of 2019, because certificates of deposit~~$112.1 million, which generally have a higher interest cost than ~~non-maturity~~other types of interest-bearing deposits.

~~The increase in~~ At March 31, 2020, there were $259 million of CDs with an average ~~non-interest bearing demand deposits of $9.9 million provided the Company with additional funding to support the organic growth in average loans.~~

~~The net tax-equivalent interest margin decreased to 3.91% for the third quarter of 2019 compared to 4.09% for the third quarter of 2018 due primarily to the higher~~ interest cost of ~~average interest-bearing liabilities, which was partially offset by~~2.10% that mature within the ~~higher yield on average earning assets.~~

~~Nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared~~next 12 months. Management will continue to adjust the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2018~~

For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, net interest income increased $2.1 million, or 6.5%, to $34.2 million compared to $32.1 million for the comparable period in 2018. The tax-equivalent net interest margin of 4.06% for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was unchanged from the prior year period. The higher interest costs of deposits and short-term borrowings offset the higher yield earned on average interest-earning assets in the first nine months of 2019 compared to the same period in 2018, resulting in no change in net interest margin.

Total interest income was $43.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $37.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018. This increase was due primarily to the $85.4 million increase in average loans, reflecting growth primarily of commercial real estate, construction and commercial business loans.

Average interest-earning assets increased $68.0 million to $1.14 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $1.07 billion for the same period in 2018. This increase was due primarily to the $85.4 million increase in average loans, which was partially offset by a decline of $14.1 million in average federal funds sold.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, the tax-equivalent yield on interest-earning assets was 5.13% and 4.73%, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, the average prime rate was higher than for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, and the yield of loans indexed to the prime rate were higher than for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities was $9.2 million, with an interest cost of 1.44%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $5.6 million, with an interest cost of 0.93%, for the same period in the prior year. The increase of $3.5 million in interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities reflected primarily higher deposit interest rates paid on deposits to reflect the then current interest rate environment and higher borrowing interest rates in the first nine months of 2019 compared to the same period in the prior year and an increase of $46.0 million in average interest-bearing liabilities. The change in the mix of deposits, with the average balance of money market, NOW and savings accounts lower than, and certificates of deposits higher than, in the first nine months of 2018 also increased the cost of total deposits in the first nine months of 2019, because certificates of deposit generally have a higher interest cost than non-maturity deposits.

Average interest-bearing liabilities increased $46.0 million, or 5.7%, to $852.0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 from $806.0 million for the first nine months of 2018 due primarily to increases in certificates of deposit. The liquidity from the increase in average interest-bearing liabilities was used to partially fund the growth of average loans.

~~The increase in average non-interest-bearing demand deposits of $14.7 million provided the Company with additional funding to support the growth of average loans.~~competitive factors.

The net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis ~~was 4.06%~~decreased 53 basis points to 3.68% for the ~~nine months ended September 30,~~first quarter of 2020 compared to 4.21% for the first quarter of 2019 ~~and 2018. The higher interest costs~~due primarily to the 54 basis point decline in the yield of ~~deposits and short-term borrowings offset the higher yield earned on~~ average interest-earning ~~assets in the first nine months of 2019 compared~~assets. Due to the ~~same period in 2018, resulting in no change in net interest margin.~~

The Company’s interest rate risk position based on its simulation model is characterized as “asset sensitive,” because it has more assets, primarily loans indexed to the prime rate, than interest bearing liabilities that adjust in a similar period of time to changes in short-term interest rates. Management has taken measures during 2019 to reduce the asset sensitivity of the balance sheet by originating loans with fixed rates, purchasing investments with fixed rates and increasing the amount of interest bearing liabilities that reprice with changes in short-term interest rates by utilizing short-term borrowings and certificates of deposit with short-term maturities.

~~The net interest margin may~~sharp decline ~~further as a result of the recent reduction~~ in the prime rate in the third and fourth quarters of 2019 followed by the further decline in the prime rate in March of 2020, the yield of loans declined 60 basis points to 5.10% and the ~~generally lower~~ interest ~~rate environment if the Company is not able reduce the~~ cost of ~~its interest bearing liabilities~~deposits was not reduced as quickly and to the same extent as the decline in the yield of ~~its~~loans.

The 150 basis point decline in the prime rate in March 2020 and the significantly lower interest rate environment had only a partial effect on the yield of loans tied to the prime rate, net interest income and the net interest margin in the first quarter of 2020. Management anticipates that the net interest margin will decline in the second quarter of 2020 due to the full quarter’s effect of the lower prime rate. The net interest margin will also be impacted by the funding of the PPP loans with a 1.0% interest rate, which will be partially offset by the recognition of the loan fees earned on these loans. The timing and impact to the net interest margin will be contingent on how quickly and to the extent that the PPP loans become grants that are repaid by the SBA over the next two years. The interest cost of interest bearing deposits is not expected to decline as quickly and to the same extent as the decline in the yield of interest earning assets.

Provision for Loan Losses

Management considers a complete review of the following specific factors in determining the provisions for loan losses: historical losses by loan category, the level of non-accrual loans and problem loans as identified through internal review and classification, collateral values and the growth, size and risk elements of the loan portfolio. In addition to these factors, management takes into consideration current economic conditions and local real estate market conditions. ~~The~~Prior to March 2020, when the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic began to be realized, the general economic environment in New Jersey and the New York City metropolitan area ~~has~~had been positive with stable and expanding economic ~~activity. Over the last five years,~~activity, and the Company ~~has~~had generally experienced stable loan credit ~~quality.~~

quality over the past five years.

~~Three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to three months ended September 30, 2018~~

~~During the third quarter of 2019, the~~The Company recorded a provision for loan losses of ~~$350,000~~$895,000 for the first quarter of 2020 compared to a provision for loan losses of ~~$225,000~~$300,000 for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2018~~2019. The significant increase in the provision for loan losses in the first quarter of 2020 includes an additional provision of approximately $388,000, which reflected an increase in the qualitative factors for national and local economic conditions due to a weakening economic operating environment primarily resulting from the existing and anticipated impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic. The higher provision also reflects, to a lesser extent, the growth and change in mix of the loan ~~portfolio~~portfolio. At March 31, 2020 total loans were $1.2 billion and the change in the mix of loans in the loan portfolio. During the third quarter of 2019, charge-offs were $18,000 and recoveries of loans previously charged-off were $4,000 compare to charge-offs of $459,000 and recoveries of loans previously charged-off of $1,000 for the third quarter of 2018. The allowance for loan losses was ~~$9.0~~$10.0 million, or ~~0.88%~~0.82% of total loans, compared to total loans of $874.3 million and an allowance for loan losses of $8.7 million, or 1.00% of total loans, at ~~September 30, 2019, compared to $8.3 million, or 0.94% of total~~March 31, 2019. Included in loans at ~~September 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2020 were $208.4 million of loans that were acquired in the Shore Merger. The decrease in the allowance as a percentage of loans was due primarily to ~~decline in specific reserves~~acquisition accounting for ~~certain impaired loans from September 30, 2018 to September 30, 2019, that were charged-off during~~ the ~~second quarter of 2019. The mix and relative risk of loans at September 30, 2019 compared to September 30, 2018 also~~Shore Merger, which resulted in ~~a lower allowance~~the Shore loans being recorded at their fair value as a percentage of loans. Management believes that the current economic conditions in New Jersey and the New York City metropolitan area and operating conditions for the Company are generally positive, which factors were also considered in management’s evaluation of the ~~adequacy~~effective time of the ~~allowance for loan losses.~~merger. The unaccreted general credit fair value discount related to the former Shore loans was $2.2 million at March 31, 2020.

~~Nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared~~Due to ~~nine months ended September 30, 2018~~

~~The Company recorded a~~the economic disruption and uncertainty caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the provision for loan losses may increase in future periods as borrowers are affected by the expected severe contraction of ~~$1.05 million for~~economic activity and the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $675,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.~~dramatic increase in unemployment. This may result in increases in loan delinquencies, down-grades of loan credit ratings and charge-offs in future periods. The provision for loan losses ~~for~~may increase significantly to reflect the ~~first nine months~~decline in the performance of ~~2019 reflected charge-offs~~

the loan portfolio and the higher level of incurred losses.

of $481,000 and recoveries of previously charged-off loans of $6,000 compared to charge-offs of $499,000 and recoveries of previously charged-off loans of $76,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2018.

Non-Interest Income

~~Three months ended September 30, 2019~~Non-interest income was $2.5 million for the first quarter of 2020, an increase of $590,000 compared to ~~three months ended September 30, 2018~~

~~Total non-interest income~~$1.9 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2019 increased $52,000 from~~2019. Gains on the ~~third quarter 2018 to $2.2 million due primarily to an increase in gain on sales~~sale of loans ~~of $59,000, partially offset by small declines in~~increased $425,000, service charges on deposit accounts increased $47,000, income on Bank-owned life insurance increased $41,000 and other ~~income.~~

~~The Company originates and sells commercial loans guaranteed by~~income increased $69,000 as compared to the ~~Small Business Administration (“SBA”) and residential mortgage loans in the secondary market.~~prior year period. In the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2019, $38.8~~2020, $34.0 million of residential mortgages were sold and ~~$1.1~~$1.2 million of gains were recorded compared to ~~$25.0~~$19.6 million of residential mortgage loans sold and ~~$702,000~~$715,000 of gains recorded in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2018. The~~2019. Management believes that the increase in residential mortgage loans sold was due primarily to ~~higher~~increased residential mortgage lending activity as a result of lower mortgage interest rates in the ~~third quarter of 2019~~2020 period compared to the ~~third~~2019 period. In the first quarter of ~~2018 due in part to a higher level of refinancing activity. In the third quarter of 2019, $2.4~~2020, $2.7 million of SBA loans were sold and gains of ~~$205,000~~$226,000 were recorded compared to ~~$7.6~~$4.7 million of SBA loans sold and gains of ~~$590,000~~$330,000 recorded in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2018.~~2019. SBA guaranteed commercial lending activity and loan sales vary from period to ~~period.~~

~~Nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2018~~

~~Total non-interest income for~~period, and the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2019 increased $160,000 to $6.2 million compared to total non-interest income~~level of ~~$6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018~~activity is due primarily to ~~increases in gain on~~ the ~~sale~~timing of ~~loans~~loan originations.

Non-interest income may decline as the origination and other income. A gain from bargain purchase related to the NJCB Merger in 2018 of $184,000 was recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 and no gain from bargain purchase was recorded in the nine months ended September 30, 2019.

~~The Company originates and sells commercial loans guaranteed by the SBA and residential mortgage loans in the secondary market. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, $86.7 million~~sale of residential mortgages were sold, which generated gains from the sales of loans of $2.7 million, as compared to sales of $69.7 million of residential mortgage loans, which generated gains of $2.0 million, during the nine months ended September 30, 2018. The increase in residential mortgage loans sold wasmay decrease due ~~primarily to higher residential mortgage lending activity in the third quarter of 2019 compared~~ to the ~~third quarter~~negative effect that mandated business closures and social distancing may have on the purchase of ~~2018.~~

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, SBA loan sales were $10.39 million and generated~~homes, which would result in lower gains on sales of ~~loans of $817,000 compared to SBA loan sales of $15.8 million that generated gains on sales of $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.~~

~~Service charges on deposit accounts increased modestly for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to the same period in 2018.~~

~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2019, other income increased $183,000 to $1.7 million compared to $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018.~~loans. The ~~increase in other income in 2019 was due primarily to a gain on the~~origination and sale of ~~OREO of $137,000 recorded in the second quarter of 2019.~~SBA loans may also decrease due to lower demand for financing by customers.

Non-Interest Expenses

For the three months ended ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, non-interest expenses were ~~$8.4~~$9.8 million compared to ~~$7.9~~$8.1 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, representing an increase of ~~$541,000,~~$1.7 million, or ~~6.9%~~21.0%. The primary reason for the increase ~~in non-interest~~was $979,000 of expenses ~~was due primarily to $302,000 of merger-related expense related~~included with respect to the former Shore ~~Merger and a $331,000 increase~~operations in ~~salaries and employee benefits, partially offset by a decline~~the first quarter of ~~$152,000 in Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) insurance expense.~~2020.

The following table presents the major components of non-interest expenses for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018:~~2019:

Three months ended September 30, Nine months ended September 30,
(Dollars in thousands) 2019 2018 2019 2018
Salaries and employee benefits $ 5,231
$ 4,900
$ 15,472
$ 14,714
Occupancy expense 972
907
2,984
2,604
Data processing expenses 379
331
1,072
1,009
Equipment expense 323
295
942
841
Marketing 62
52
253
231
Telephone 97
97
290
299
Regulatory, professional and consulting fees 426
413
1,259
1,369
Insurance 96
91
283
293
Supplies 65
65
188
231
FDIC insurance expense (47 ) 105
113
381
Other real estate owned expenses 52
73
134
75
Merger-related expense 302
—
575
2,141
Amortization of intangible assets 30
94
93
281
Other expenses 447
471
1,438
1,321
Total $ 8,435
$ 7,894
$ 25,096
$ 25,790

~~Three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to three month period ended September 30, 2018~~

~~Non-interest expenses increased $541,000 to $8.4 million for the third quarter of 2019, compared to $7.9 million for the third quarter of 2018.~~



	Three months ended March 31,
(Dollars in thousands)	2020		2019
Salaries and employee benefits	$	6,169	$	4,963
Occupancy expense	1,170		1,021
Data processing expenses	446		348
Equipment expense	411		324
Marketing	44		80
Telephone	125		96
Regulatory, professional and consulting fees	464		457
Insurance	119		90
Supplies	97		66
FDIC insurance expense	34		100
Other real estate owned expenses	17		48
Amortization of intangible assets	122		32
Other expenses	575		469
Total	$	9,793	$	8,094

Salaries and employee benefits, which represent the largest portion of non-interest expenses, increased by ~~$331,000,~~$1.2 million, or ~~6.8%~~24.3%, to ~~$5.2~~$6.2 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~$4.9~~$5.0 million for the three months ended ~~September 30, 2018,~~March 31, 2019, due primarily to ~~a $157,000 increase in~~salaries and benefits for former Shore employees ($486,000) who joined the Company, higher commissions ~~as a result~~expense of $328,000 related to the ~~higher level~~origination of residential mortgage ~~lending,~~loans primarily for sale, merit increases and increases in employee benefit expenses.

Occupancy expense increased ~~$65,000,~~$149,000 to $1.2 million, or ~~7.2%~~14.6%, due primarily to the ~~opening of a branch office in Long Branch, New Jersey at the end~~addition of the ~~second quarter of 2019 and the leasing of additional office space.~~five former Shore branch offices, compared to $1.0 million in 2019.

Data processing expenses increased to ~~$379,000~~$446,000 in the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2019~~2020 compared to ~~$331,000~~$348,000 for the ~~third quarter of 2018 due primarily to the growth of loans and deposits and new customer services and products added during the 2019 period.~~

FDIC insurance expense decreased $152,000 due primarily to the receipt from the FDIC of the small bank assessment credit of $87,000 for the second quarter of 2019. As a result of the receipt of the credit, the assessment for the second quarter of 2019 was fully offset and no payment was due. Accordingly, the $87,000 credit was recorded in the third quarter of 2019 and more than offset the expense accrued for the quarter. The Bank has a remaining credit of approximately $198,000 that may be applied by the FDIC to future quarters’ assessments. The application and receipt of future credits will depend on future reserve calculations for the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC. In addition, the reduction in the FDIC assessment rate due to the financial condition of the Bank also contributed to the decrease in the FDIC insurance expense.

~~Other real estate owned expenses decreased $21,000 to $52,000 for the third quarter of 2019 and included primarily ownership costs for property insurance and other maintenance expenses.~~

Merger-related expense of $302,000 was incurred in the third quarter of 2019 for legal and financial advisory fees in connection with the Shore Merger. There was no merger-related expense incurred in the third quarter of 2018.

~~Amortization expense of intangible assets decreased $64,000 to $30,000 in the third~~first quarter of 2019 due primarily to the ~~full amortization of the core deposit intangible in the third quarter of 2018 related to the acquisition of three branch offices and their deposits in 2011.~~

~~Other operating expenses decreased $24,000 due primarily to decreases in loan and appraisal expenses.~~

~~Nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2018~~

Non-interest expenses were $25.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $25.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, representing a decrease of $694,000, or 2.7%. Merger-related expense of $575,000 was incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2019 related to the Shore Merger compared to $2.1 million incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2018 related to the NJCB Merger.

Salaries and employee benefits, which represent the largest portion of non-interest expenses, were $15.5 million and $14.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, representing an increase of $758,000, or 5.2%. The $758,000 increase in salaries and employee benefits included $169,000 of salaries for former NJCB employees who joined the Company following the NJCB Merger and a $103,000 increase in mortgage commissions due to higher level of residential mortgage lending . The remaining increase in salaries and benefits was related to merit increases, employee health benefit expenses and addition of new staff.

~~Occupancy expense increased $380,000 to $3.0 million for the first nine months of 2019 compared to $2.6 million for the comparable period in 2018. Of the total increase, $123,000 was related to the~~ addition of the ~~two former NJCB branch offices acquired~~Shore operations ($85,000) and increases in loans, deposits and other customer services.

FDIC insurance expense declined to $34,000 from the $100,000 in the ~~NJCB Merger and the remaining increase in occupancy expense was due primarily to the opening of a branch office in Long Branch, New Jersey at the end of the second~~first quarter of 2019, ~~the leasing of additional office space, as well as increases in other occupancy costs.~~

~~Regulatory, professional and consulting fees declined $110,000~~due to $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018 due primarily to lower legal and consulting fees resulting from a decrease in litigations expenses and loan collection matters.

The Company recorded FDIC insurance expense of $113,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $381,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, a decrease of $268,000, due primarily to the reduction in the FDIC assessment rate and the receipt from FDIC of the small bank assessment credit received of $123,000 for the ~~second quarter of 2019. As a result, the assessment for the second quarter of 2019 was offset and no payment was due. The $87,000 credit was recorded in the third~~fourth quarter of 2019. The ~~Bank~~full credit has ~~a remaining credit of approximately $198,000 that may be~~been applied ~~by the FDIC to future quarters’ assessments. The application~~ and ~~receipt of future~~no further credits will ~~depend on future reserve calculations for the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC.~~

Other real estate owned expenses increased by $59,000 to $134,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $75,000 for the same period in 2018 due primarily to maintenance and ownership expenses of the OREO properties.

Merger-related expense of $575,000 was incurred in the nine months ended September 30, 2019 related to the Shore Merger compared to $2.1 million related to the NJCB Merger in the nine months ended September 30, 2018.be received.

Amortization ~~expense~~ of intangible assets ~~decreased $188,000~~increased $90,000 to ~~$93,000 in~~$122,000 for the ~~first nine~~three months ofended March 31, 2020 compared to $32,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2019 due primarily to the ~~full~~$94,000 amortization of ~~the~~a core deposit intangible ~~in the third quarter of 2018~~ related to the ~~acquisition of three branch offices and their deposits in 2011.~~Shore Merger.

Other expenses ~~totaled $1.4 million~~increased $106,000, or 22.6%, primarily resulting from additional expenses incurred as a result of the Shore Merger ($73,000).

Non-interest expenses may increase, if there is a significant increase in non-performing loans, due to higher expenses for loan collection and recovery costs. In addition, FDIC insurance expense may increase if the ~~nine months ended September 30, 2019 compared to $1.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2018, representing an increase~~Bank’s financial condition is adversely impacted by a higher level of ~~$117,000, due primarily to general increases in various other operating expense categories year over year.~~non-performing loans and assets.

Income Taxes

~~Three months ended September 30, 2019 compared to three month period ended September 30, 2018~~

Income tax expense was $1.3 million for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2019,~~2020 resulting in an effective tax rate of ~~26.6%~~27.3%, compared to income tax expense of ~~$1.4~~$1.3 million, which resulted in an effective tax rate of ~~26.2%~~27.7% for the ~~third~~first quarter of ~~2018. The higher effective tax rate in the third quarter of 2019 was primarily the result of certain merger-related expense related to the Shore Merger that was not deductible.~~2019.

~~Nine Months Ended September 30, 2019 compared to nine months ended September 30, 2018~~

Income tax expense was $3.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2019, resulting in an effective tax rate of 27.2%, compared to income tax expense of $3.0 million for the comparable period in 2018, which resulted in an effective tax rate of 25.4%. The $908,000 increase in income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 was due primarily to the $2.6 million increase in pre-tax income.

The effective tax rate increased in the 2019 period due primarily to the increase in pre-tax income for which income tax was accrued at the combined federal and New Jersey statutory income tax rate of 30.01% and certain merger-related expense related to the Shore Merger that was not deductible.

~~Financial Condition~~

FINANCIAL CONDITION

~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to December 31, ~~2018~~2019

Total consolidated assets were ~~$1.34~~$1.61 billion at ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, an increase of ~~$164.7~~$24.6 million from total consolidated assets of ~~$1.18~~$1.59 billion at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. This increase was due primarily to ~~the $141.8~~a $19.7 million increase in total investment securities and a $5.8 million increase in loans anheld for sale. The increase ~~of $3.9~~in assets was funded primarily by a $20.7 million increase in ~~cash~~deposits and ~~cash equivalents and an~~a $2.1 million increase ~~of $15.1 million~~ in right-of-use assets related to the adoption of the new lease accounting standard, ASC Topic 842. Other real estate owned declined $1.1 million as a result of the sale of one property in the second quarter of 2019.short-term borrowings.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents totaled ~~$20.8~~$12.0 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~$16.8~~$14.8 million at December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, representing ~~an increase~~a decrease of ~~$3.9~~$2.8 million. The ~~increase~~decrease in cash and cash equivalents reflects a short-term decrease in interest-earning deposits, partially offset by an increase in ~~both~~ cash and due from banks, ~~and interest-earning deposits that will be employed to fund the expected growth~~as a result of ~~loans.~~current market conditions.

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale were ~~$6.7~~$11.8 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~$3.0~~$5.9 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The amount of loans held for sale varies from period to period due to changes in the amount and timing of sales of residential mortgage loans and SBA guaranteed commercial loans.

Investment Securities

Investment securities represented approximately ~~15.6%~~15.7% of total assets at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and approximately ~~18.0%~~14.7% of total assets at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Total investment securities ~~decreased $1.8~~increased $19.7 million to ~~$210.0~~$252.1 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 from ~~$211.8~~$232.4 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Purchases of investment securities totaled ~~$37.6~~$35.1 million during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, and proceeds from ~~sales,~~ calls, maturities and payments totaled ~~$41.6~~$14.9 million during this same period.

Securities available for sale are investments that may be sold in response to changing market and interest rate conditions or for other business purposes. Activity in this portfolio is undertaken primarily to manage liquidity and interest rate risk and to take advantage of market conditions that create economically attractive returns. At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, securities available for sale were ~~$135.1~~$163.7 million, an increase of ~~$2.9~~$7.9 million, or ~~2.2%~~5.1%, compared to securities available for sale of ~~$132.2~~$155.8 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the securities available for sale portfolio had net unrealized gains of ~~$408,000~~$226,000 compared to net unrealized ~~losses~~gains of ~~$2.2 million~~$414,000 at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. These net unrealized gains were reflected, net of tax, in shareholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The change from a net unrealized loss to a net unrealized gain in the first nine months of 2019 was due principally to the lower intermediate and longer-term market interest rates at September 30, 2019 than at December 31, 2018.

Securities held to maturity, which are carried at amortized historical cost, are investments for which there is the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity. At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, securities held to maturity were ~~$74.9~~$88.4 million, ~~a decrease~~an increase of ~~$4.7~~$11.8 million from ~~$79.6~~$76.6 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The fair value of the held to maturity portfolio was ~~$76.8~~$91.1 million at ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

Loans

The loan portfolio, which represents the Company’s largest asset, is a significant source of both interest and fee income. Elements of the loan portfolio are subject to differing levels of credit and interest rate risk. The Company’s primary lending focus continues to be the financing of mortgage warehouse lines, construction loans, commercial business loans, owner-occupied commercial mortgage loans and commercial real estate loans on income-producing assets.

The following table represents the components of the loan portfolio at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:


	September 30, 2019				December 31, 2018				March 31, 2020				December 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		%		Amount		%		Amount		%		Amount		%
Commercial real estate	$	422,774	41	%	$	388,431	39	%	$	576,886	47	%	$	567,655	47	%
Mortgage warehouse lines	252,704		25		154,183		24		224,793		19		236,672		20
Construction loans	156,394		15		149,387		17		145,599		12		148,939		12
Commercial business	115,400		11		120,590		12		150,068		12		139,271		11
Residential real estate	55,023		6		47,263		5		89,347		7		90,259		7
Loans to individuals	22,194		2		22,962		3		30,556		3		32,604		3
All other	160		—		181		—
Other loans									141		—		137		—
Total loans	1,024,649		100	%	882,997		100	%	1,217,390		100	%	1,215,537		100	%
Deferred loan costs, net	382				167				417				491
Total loans, including deferred loans costs, net	$	1,025,031			$	883,164			$	1,217,807			$	1,216,028

Total loans remained relatively steady, increasing only $1.8 million, or 0.1%, to $1.2 billion at March 31, 2020 compared to $1.2 billion at December 31, 2019. Commercial business loans and commercial real estate loans increased by ~~$141.9~~$10.8 million ~~or 16.1%, to $1.02 billion~~and $9.2 million, respectively. Partially offsetting these increases, mortgage warehouse lines and construction loans decreased $11.9 million and $3.3 million, respectively.

Commercial real estate loans totaled $576.9 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, representing an increase of $9.2 million compared to ~~$883.2~~$567.7 million at December 31, ~~2018. The increase in loans is due primarily to an increase of $98.5 million in mortgage warehouse loans, a $34.3 million increase in commercial~~2019. Commercial real estate loans ~~a $7.8 million in increase in residential~~consist primarily of loans to businesses that are collateralized by real estate ~~loans~~assets employed in the operation of the business and ~~a $7.0 million increase in construction loans, which was partially offset by a $5.2 million decrease in commercial business loans and a $768,000 decrease in~~ loans to ~~individuals.~~real estate investors to finance the acquisition and/or improvement of owned income-producing commercial properties.

Outstanding balances on mortgage warehouse lines increased $98.5 million to $252.7 million at September 30, 2019 compared to $154.2 million at December 31, 2018, reflecting the seasonal nature of residential lending in the Bank’s markets, which generally experience higher home purchase activity during the spring and summer months as compared to other periods during the year, and a higher level of refinancing activity due to the decline in residential mortgage interest rates in 2019.

The Bank’s mortgage warehouse funding group provides revolving lines of credit that are available to licensed mortgage banking companies. The warehouse line of credit is used by the mortgage banker to finance the origination of one-to-four family residential mortgage loans that are pre-sold to the secondary mortgage market, which includes state and national banks, national mortgage banking firms, insurance companies and government-sponsored enterprises, including the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation and the Government National Mortgage Association. On average, an advance under the warehouse line of credit remains outstanding for a period of less than 30 days, with repayment coming directly from the sale of the loan into the secondary mortgage market. The Bank collects interest and a transaction fee at the time of repayment. ~~The Bank funded $999.5~~Mortgage warehouse totaled $224.8 million ~~and $2.5 billion of residential mortgages through customers’ warehouse lines of credit during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019, respectively,~~at March 31, 2020 compared to ~~$911.8 million and $2.6 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018, respectively.~~

~~Commercial real estate loans increased $34.3 million, or 8.8%, to $422.8 million at September 30, 2019 from $388.4~~$236.7 million at December 31, ~~2018. Commercial real estate~~2019. In the first quarter of 2020, $855.6 million of residential mortgage loans ~~consist primarily of loans~~were financed through the mortgage warehouse funding group compared to ~~businesses collateralized by real estate employed in~~$644.0 million during the ~~business and loans to finance investor owned income-producing properties.~~first quarter 2019.

Construction loans totaled ~~$156.4~~$145.6 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~$149.4~~$148.9 million at December 31, ~~2018, an increase of $7.0 million, or 4.7%.~~2019. Construction financing is provided to businesses to expand their facilities and operations and to real estate developers for the acquisition, development and construction of residential properties and income-producing properties. First mortgage construction loans are made to developers and builders for single family homes or multi-family buildings that are pre-sold or are to be sold or leased on a speculative basis. The Bank lends to developers and builders with established relationships, successful operating histories and sound financial resources.

The Bank also finances the construction of individual, owner-occupied single-family homes. These loans are made to qualified individual borrowers and are generally supported by a take-out commitment from a permanent lender.

Commercial business loans ~~decreased $5.2 million, or 4.3%, to $115.4~~totaled $150.1 million at ~~September 30, 2019 from $120.6~~March 31, 2020 compared to $139.3 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Commercial business loans consist primarily of loans to small and middle market businesses and are typically working capital loans used to finance inventory, receivables or equipment needs. ~~Business~~These loans are generally secured by business assets of the commercial ~~borrower~~borrower.

Residential real estate loans totaled $89.3 million at March 31, 2020 compared to $90.3 million at December 31, 2019. Loans to individuals, which are ~~generally pledged as collateral for these loans.~~comprised primarily of home equity loans, totaled $30.6 million at March 31, 2020 compared to $32.6 million at December 31, 2019.

The ability of the Company to enter into larger loan relationships and management’s philosophy of relationship banking are key factors in the Company’s strategy for loan growth. The ultimate collectability of the loan portfolio and recovery of the carrying amount of real estate are subject to changes in the economic environment and real estate market in the Company’s market region, which is primarily New Jersey and the New York City metropolitan area.

If the economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic continues for an extended period of time, the Company may experience a decline in the origination of new loans and total loans could decline.

Non-Performing Assets

Non-performing assets consist of non-performing loans and other real estate owned. Non-performing loans are composed of (1) loans on non-accrual basis and (2) loans which are contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest and principal payments but which have not been classified as non-accrual. Included in non-accrual loans are loans, the terms of which have been restructured to provide a reduction or deferral of interest and/or principal because of deterioration in the financial position of the borrower and have not performed in accordance with the restructured terms. Loan payments that are deferred due to COVID-19 continue to accrue interest and are not presented as past due in the table below.

The Bank’s policy with regard to non-accrual loans is that, generally, loans are placed on non-accrual status when they are 90 days past due, unless these loans are well secured and in process of collection or, regardless of the past due status of the loan, when management determines that the complete recovery of principal or interest is in doubt. Consumer loans are generally charged off after they become 120 days past due. Subsequent payments on loans in non-accrual status are credited to income only if collection of principal is not in doubt.

At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, non-performing loans ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$1.3~~$8.7 million to ~~$5.3~~$13.2 million from ~~$6.6~~$4.5 million at December 31, ~~2018, 2018,~~2019, and the ratio of non-performing loans to total loans ~~decreased~~increased to ~~0.51%~~1.08% at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~0.75%~~0.37% at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019, $1.4 million~~March 31, 2020, $513,000 of non-performing loans were resolved, ~~$2.9 million of loans were returned to accrual status, $481,000~~$165,000 of loans were charged-off and ~~$3.5~~$9.2 million of loans were placed on non-accrual. InDuring the first quarter of ~~2019, the Bank was notified that~~2020, a ~~shared national credit syndicated loan in which it was a participant~~$7.5 million participation in a ~~$4.3~~construction loan, $1.5 million ~~facility was upgraded~~in commercial real estate loans, $84,000 in commercial business loans and $108,000 of loans to pass rating from substandard rating and was no longer classified as a non-accrual loan. As of the date of notification, the Bank upgraded the loan, which had a balance of $2.8 million at that time, and returned the loan to accrual status. The loan facility was paid off in full during the third quarter of 2019.individuals were placed on non-accrual.

The major segments of non-accrual loans consist of commercial business, commercial real estate and residential real estate loans, which are in the process of collection. The table below sets forth non-performing assets and risk elements in the Bank’s portfolio for the periods indicated.

(Dollars in thousands) September 30, 2019 December 31, 2018
Non-performing loans:
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing $ —
$ 55
Non-accrual loans 5,266
6,525
Total non-performing loans 5,266
6,580
Other real estate owned 1,460
2,515
Total non-performing assets 6,726
9,095
Performing troubled debt restructurings 6,158
4,003
Performing troubled debt restructurings and total non-performing assets $ 12,884
$ 13,098

Non-performing loans to total loans 0.51 % 0.75 %
Non-performing loans to total loans excluding mortgage warehouse lines 0.68 % 0.90 %
Non-performing assets to total assets 0.50 % 0.77 %
Non-performing assets to total assets excluding mortgage warehouse lines 0.62 % 0.89 %
Total non-performing assets and performing troubled debt restructurings to total assets 0.96 % 1.11 %

The ratio of non-performing loans to total loans decreased to 0.51% at September 30, 2019 from 0.75% at December 31, 2018 due primarily to a $2.8 million loan which was upgraded and returned to accrual status. The loan was paid off in full during the third quarter of 2019. Non-performing assets represented 0.50% of total assets at September 30, 2019 compared to 0.77% of total assets at December 31, 2018.



(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2020			December 31, 2019
Non-performing loans:
Loans 90 days or more past due and still accruing	$	—		$	—
Non-accrual loans	13,198			4,497
Total non-performing loans	13,198			4,497
Other real estate owned	470			571
Total non-performing assets	13,668			5,068
Performing troubled debt restructurings	6,112			6,132
Performing troubled debt restructurings and total non-performing assets	$	19,780		$	11,200

Non-performing loans to total loans	1.08		%	0.37		%
Non-performing loans to total loans excluding mortgage warehouse lines	1.33		%	0.46		%
Non-performing assets to total assets	0.85		%	0.32		%
Non-performing assets to total assets excluding mortgage warehouse lines	0.99		%	0.38		%
Total non-performing assets and performing troubled debt restructurings to total assets	1.23		%	0.71		%

Non-performing assets ~~decreased~~increased by ~~$2.4~~$8.6 million to ~~$6.7~~$13.7 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 from ~~$9.1~~$5.1 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. OREO totaled ~~$1.5 million~~$470,000 at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~$2.5 million~~$571,000 at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. One residential ~~real estate property~~lot acquired in the ~~NJCB~~Shore Merger with a carrying value of ~~$1.1 million~~$101,000 was sold in the ~~second~~first quarter of ~~2019 and a gain of $137,000 was recognized.~~2020. OREO at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 was comprised of 5 residential lots acquired in the Shore Merger with a carrying value of $377,000 and land with a carrying value of $93,000 that was foreclosed in the second quarter of ~~2018 and a commercial real estate property that was foreclosed in the third quarter of 2018 with a fair value of $1.4 million.~~2018.

At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the Bank had 13 loans totaling ~~$6.5~~$6.4 million that were troubled debt restructurings. Three of these loans totaling ~~$359,000~~$335,000 are included in the above table as non-accrual loans and the remaining ten loans totaling ~~$6.2~~$6.1 million were performing. At

December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank had 1213 loans totaling ~~$7.3~~$6.4 million that were troubled debt restructurings. ~~Four~~Three of these loans totaling ~~$3.3 million~~$345,000 are included in the above table as non-accrual loans and the remaining ~~eight~~nine loans totaling ~~$4.0~~$6.1 million were performing.

In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the excess of cash flows expected at acquisition over the initial investment in the purchase of a credit impaired loan is recognized as interest income over the life of the loan. At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, there were ~~two~~12 loans acquired with evidence

of deteriorated credit quality totaling ~~$843,000~~$5.2 million that were not classified as non-performing loans. At December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, there were ~~two~~11 loans acquired with evidence of deteriorated credit quality totaling ~~$865,000~~$4.6 million that were not classified as non-performing loans.

Management takes a proactive approach in addressing delinquent loans. The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer meets weekly with all loan officers to review the status of credits past due 10 days or more. An action plan is discussed for delinquent loans to determine the steps necessary to induce the borrower to cure the delinquency and restore the loan to a current status. In addition, delinquency notices are system-generated when loans are five days past due and again at 15 days past due.

In most cases, the Company’s collateral is real estate. If the collateral is foreclosed upon, the real estate is carried at fair market value less the estimated selling costs. The amount, if any, by which the recorded amount of the loan exceeds the fair market value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs, is a loss that is charged to the allowance for loan losses at the time of foreclosure or repossession. Resolution of a past-due loan through foreclosure can be delayed if the borrower files a bankruptcy petition because a collection action cannot be continued unless the Company first obtains relief from the automatic stay provided by the United States Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978, as amended.

Management periodically reviews the level of loan concentrations by industry, borrower and geography. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, management identified certain industries that were most likely to be adversely impacted in the near-term by the economic disruption caused by the pandemic. The following table summarizes those industry concentrations, as well as the amount of loan modification and forbearance granted, the amount of PPP loans funded and the amount of loans that are guaranteed by the SBA for which the SBA will be paying the interest and principal for the next six months within each such industry.



(Dollars in thousands)	Balance		% of Total Loans	COVID-19 Deferrals		SBA Paying P&I		PPP Loans
Hotels	$	67,849	5.6%	$	41,367	$	1,667	$	462
Restaurant-food service	50,523		4.1%	15,140		4,408		4,220

Allowance for Loan Losses and Related Provision

The allowance for loan losses is maintained at a level sufficient to absorb estimated credit losses in the loan portfolio as of the date of the financial statements. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation reserve available for losses incurred or inherent in the loan portfolio and other extensions of credit. The determination of the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses is a critical accounting policy of the Company.

The Company’s primary lending emphasis is the origination of commercial business, construction and commercial real estate loans and mortgage warehouse lines of credit. Based on the composition of the loan portfolio, the inherent primary risks are deteriorating credit quality, a decline in the economy and a decline in New Jersey and New York City metropolitan area real estate market values. Any one, or a combination, of these events may adversely affect the loan portfolio and may result in increased delinquencies, loan losses and increased future provision levels.

Due to the economic disruption and uncertainty caused by the pandemic, the allowance for loan losses may increase in future periods as borrowers are affected by the expected severe contraction of economic activity and the dramatic increase in unemployment. This may result in increases in loan delinquencies, down-grades of loan credit ratings and charge-offs in future periods. The allowance for loan losses may increase significantly to reflect the decline in the performance of the loan portfolio and the higher level of incurred losses.

All, or part, of the principal balance of commercial business and commercial real estate loans and construction loans are charged off against the allowance as soon as it is determined that the repayment of all, or part, of the principal balance is highly unlikely. Consumer loans are generally charged off no later than 120 days past due on a contractual basis, earlier in the event of bankruptcy, or if there is an amount deemed uncollectible. Because all identified losses are charged off, no portion of the allowance for loan losses is restricted to any individual loan or groups of loans and the entire allowance is available to absorb any and all loan losses.

Management reviews the adequacy of the allowance on at least a quarterly basis to ensure that the provision for loan losses has been charged against earnings in an amount necessary to maintain the allowance at a level that is adequate based on management’s assessment of probable estimated losses. The Company’s methodology for assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses consists of several key elements and is consistent with U.S. GAAP and interagency supervisory guidance. The allowance for loan losses

methodology consists of two major components. The first component is an estimation of losses associated with individually identified impaired loans, which follows ASC Topic 310. The second major component is an estimation of losses under ASC Topic 450, which provides guidance for estimating losses on groups of loans with similar risk characteristics. The Company’s methodology results in an allowance for loan losses that includes a specific reserve for impaired loans, an allocated reserve and an unallocated portion.

When analyzing groups of loans, the Company follows the Interagency Policy Statement on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses. The methodology considers the Company’s historical loss experience adjusted for changes in trends, conditions and other relevant factors that affect repayment of the loans as of the evaluation date. These adjustment factors, known as qualitative factors, include:

Delinquencies and non-accruals;

Portfolio quality;

Concentration of credit;

Trends in volume of loans;

Quality of collateral;

Policy and procedures;

Experience, ability and depth of management;

Economic trends - national and local; and

External factors - competition, legal and regulatory.

The methodology includes the segregation of the loan portfolio into loan types with a further segregation into risk rating categories, such as special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. This allows for an allocation of the allowance for loan losses by loan type; however, the allowance is available to absorb any loan loss without restriction. Larger-balance, non-homogeneous loans representing significant individual credit exposures are evaluated individually through the internal loan review process. This process produces the watch list. The borrower’s overall financial condition, repayment sources, guarantors and value of collateral, if appropriate, are evaluated. Based on this evaluation, an estimate of probable losses for the individual larger-balance loans is determined, whenever possible, and used to establish specific loan loss reserves. In general, for non-homogeneous loans not individually assessed and for homogeneous groups of loans, such as residential mortgages and consumer credits, the loans are collectively evaluated based on delinquency status, loan type and historical losses. These loan groups are then internally risk rated.

The watch list includes loans that are assigned a rating of special mention, substandard, doubtful and loss. Loans classified as special mention have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If uncorrected, the potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects. Loans classified as substandard have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They include loans that are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in loans classified as substandard with the added characteristic that collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current conditions and facts, is highly improbable. Loans rated as doubtful are placed in non-accrual status. Loans classified as a loss are considered uncollectible and are charged-off against the allowance for loan losses.

The specific allowance for impaired loans is established for specific loans that have been identified by management as being impaired. These loans are considered to be impaired primarily because the loans have not performed according to payment terms and there is reason to believe that repayment of the loan principal in whole, or in part, is unlikely. The specific portion of the allowance is the total amount of potential unconfirmed losses for these individual impaired loans. To assist in determining the fair value of loan collateral, the Company often utilizes independent third-party qualified appraisal firms, which employ their own criteria and assumptions that may include occupancy rates, rental rates and property expenses, among others.

The second category of reserves consists of the allocated portion of the allowance. The allocated portion of the allowance is determined by taking pools of outstanding loans that have similar characteristics and applying historical loss experience for each pool. This estimate represents the potential unconfirmed losses within the portfolio. Individual loan pools are created for commercial business loans, commercial real estate loans, construction loans, warehouse lines of credit and various types of loans to individuals. The historical estimation for each loan pool is then adjusted to account for current conditions, current loan portfolio performance, loan policy or management changes or any other qualitative factor that management believes may cause future losses to deviate from historical levels.

The Company also maintains an unallocated allowance. The unallocated allowance is used to cover any factors or conditions that may cause a potential loan loss but are not specifically identifiable. It is prudent to maintain an unallocated portion of the allowance because no matter how detailed an analysis of potential loan losses is performed, these estimates, by definition, lack precision. Management must make estimates using assumptions and information that is often subjective and changing rapidly.

The following discusses the risk characteristics of each of our loan portfolios.

Commercial Business

The Company offers a variety of commercial loan services, including term loans, lines of credit and loans secured by equipment and receivables. A broad range of short-to-medium term commercial loans, both secured and unsecured, are made available to businesses for working capital (including inventory and receivables), business expansion (including acquisition and development of real estate and improvements) and the purchase of equipment and machinery. Commercial business loans are granted based on the borrower's ability to generate cash flow to support its debt obligations and other cash related expenses. A borrower's ability to repay commercial business loans is substantially dependent on the success of the business itself and on the quality of its management. As a general practice, the Company takes, as collateral, a security interest in any available real estate, equipment, inventory, receivables or other personal property of its borrowers, although the Company occasionally makes commercial business loans on an unsecured basis. Generally, the Company requires personal guarantees of its commercial business loans to offset the risks associated with such loans.

Much of the Company's lending is in northern and central New Jersey and the New York City metropolitan area. As a result of this geographic concentration, a significant broad-based deterioration in economic conditions in New Jersey and the New York City metropolitan area could have a material adverse impact on the Company's loan portfolio. A prolonged decline in economic conditions in our market area could restrict borrowers' ability to pay outstanding principal and interest on loans when due. The value of assets pledged as collateral may decline and the proceeds from the sale or liquidation of these assets may not be sufficient to repay the loan.

Commercial Real Estate

Commercial real estate loans are made to businesses to expand their facilities and operations and to real estate operators to finance the acquisition of income producing properties. The Company's loan policy requires that borrowers have sufficient cash flow to meet the debt service requirements and the value of the property meets the loan-to-value criteria set in the loan policy. The Company monitors loan concentrations by borrower, by type of property and by location and other criteria.

The Company's commercial real estate portfolio is largely secured by real estate collateral located in New Jersey and the New York City metropolitan area. Conditions in the real estate markets in which the collateral for the Company's loans are located strongly influence the level of the Company's non-performing loans. A decline in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan area real estate markets could adversely affect the Company's loan portfolio. Decreases in local real estate values would adversely affect the value of property used as collateral for the Company's loans. Adverse changes in the economy also may have a negative effect on the ability of our borrowers to make timely repayments of their loans.

Construction Financing

Construction financing is provided to businesses to expand their facilities and operations and to real estate developers for the acquisition, development and construction of residential and commercial properties. First mortgage construction loans are made to developers and builders primarily for single family homes and multi-family buildings that are presold or are to be sold or leased on a speculative basis.

The Company lends to builders and developers with established relationships, successful operating histories and sound financial resources. Management has established underwriting and monitoring criteria to minimize the inherent risks of real estate construction lending. The risks associated with speculative construction lending include the borrower's inability to complete the construction process on time and within budget, the sale or rental of the project within projected absorption periods and the economic risks associated with real estate collateral. Such loans may include financing the development and/or construction of residential subdivisions. This activity may involve financing land purchases and infrastructure development (such as roads, utilities, etc.), as well as construction of residences or multi-family dwellings for subsequent sale by the developer/builder. Because the sale or rental of developed properties is integral to the success of developer business, loan repayment may be especially subject to the volatility of real estate market values.

Mortgage Warehouse Lines of Credit

The Company’s Mortgage Warehouse Funding Group provides revolving lines of credit that are available to licensed mortgage banking companies. The warehouse line of credit is used by the mortgage banker to originate one-to-four family residential mortgage loans that are pre-sold to the secondary mortgage market, which includes state and national banks, national mortgage banking firms, insurance companies and government-sponsored enterprises, including the Federal National Mortgage Association, the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, the Government National Mortgage Association and others. On average, an advance under the warehouse line of credit remains outstanding for a period of less than 30 days, with repayment coming directly from the sale of the loan into the secondary mortgage market. Interest and a transaction fee are collected by the Bank at the time of repayment.

As a separate class of the total loan portfolio, the warehouse loan portfolio is individually analyzed as a whole for allowance for loan losses purposes. Warehouse lines of credit are subject to the same inherent risks as other commercial lending, but the overall degree of risk differs. While the Company’s loss experience with this type of lending has been non-existent since the product was introduced in 2008, there are other risks unique to this lending that still must be considered in assessing the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses. These unique risks may include, but are not limited to, (i) credit risks relating to the mortgage bankers that borrow from us, (ii) the risk of intentional misrepresentation or fraud by any of such mortgage bankers, (iii) changes in the market value of mortgage loans originated by the mortgage banker, the sale of which is the expected source of repayment of the borrowings under a warehouse line of credit, due to changes in interest rates during the time in warehouse or (iv) unsalable or impaired mortgage loans so originated, which could lead to decreased collateral value and the failure of a purchaser of the mortgage loan to purchase the loan from the mortgage banker.

Consumer

The Company’s consumer loan portfolio is comprised of residential real estate loans, home equity loans and other loans to individuals. Individual loan pools are created for the various types of loans to individuals. The principal risk is the borrower becomes unemployed or has a significant reduction in income.

In general, for homogeneous groups such as residential mortgages and consumer credits, the loans are collectively evaluated based on delinquency status, loan type and historical losses. These loan groups are then internally risk rated.

The Company considers the following credit quality indicators in assessing the risk in the loan portfolio:

•Consumer credit scores;

•Internal credit risk grades;

•Loan-to-value ratios;

•Collateral; and

•Collection experience.

Management also evaluated the potential that incurred losses had increased with respect to the concentrations in hotels and restaurant-food service loans. In reviewing the loans in the hotels concentration, management noted that all loans were current, except for one loan with a balance of $1.3 million that was on non-accrual, and the weighted average loan to value of the hotel loans was 55%.

With the respect to the restaurant-food service concentration, management observed that all loans with balances greater than $400,000 in this concentration were current, except for one loan with a balance of $1.8 million that was on non-accrual, and the weighted average loan to value of these restaurant-food service loans was 63%.

On the basis of this review and the evaluation of the loans in the hotels and restaurant-food service concentrations, management concluded that if loan defaults increase it would require a substantial decrease in the value of the collateral supporting these loans for there to be a significant increase in incurred losses in the hotels and restaurant-food service concentrations at March 31, 2020.

The following table presents, for the periods indicated, an analysis of the allowance for loan losses and other related data:


	Nine months ended			Year ended			Nine months ended
(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			September 30, 2018			Three Months Ended March 31, 2020			Year Ended December 31, 2019			Three Months Ended March 31, 2019
Balance, beginning of period	$	8,402		$	8,013		$	8,013		$	9,271		$	8,402		$	8,402
Provision charged to operating expenses	1,050			900			675			895			1,350			300
Loans charged off:
Residential real estate loans	—			—			—			—			—			—
Commercial business and commercial real estate	(438		)	(553		)	(473		)	(165		)	(463		)	—
Loans to individuals	—			(16		)	(7		)	—			(7		)	—
All other loans	(43		)	(17		)	(19		)	—			(43		)	—
Total loans charged off	(481		)	(586		)	(499		)	(165		)	(513		)	—
Recoveries:
Commercial business and commercial real estate	—			74			75			—			26			—
Loans to individuals	6			1			1			—			6			2
All other loans	—			—			—			—			—			—
Total recoveries	6			75			76			—			32			2
Net (charge offs) recoveries	(475		)	(511		)	(423		)	(165		)	(481		)	2
Balance, end of period	$	8,977		$	8,402		$	8,265		$	10,001		$	9,271		$	8,704
Loans:
At period end	$	1,025,031		$	883,164		$	881,538		$	1,217,807		$	1,216,028		$	874,333
Average during the period	910,975			832,966			825,535			1,166,850			964,920			864,785
Net (charge offs) recoveries to average loans outstanding	(0.05		)%	(0.06		)%	(0.05		)%	(0.01		)%	(0.05		)%	—		%
Net (charge offs) recoveries to average loans outstanding, excluding mortgage warehouse loans	(0.06		)%	(0.08		)%	(0.06		)%	(0.02		)%	(0.06		)%	0.01		%
Allowance for loan losses to:
Total loans at period end	0.88		%	0.95		%	0.94		%	0.82		%	0.76		%	1.00		%
Total loans at period end excluding mortgage warehouse loans	1.16		%	1.05		%	1.06		%	0.90		%	0.84		%	1.09		%
Non-performing loans	170.47		%	127.69		%	122.25		%	75.78		%	206.16		%	248.76		%

The following table represents the allocation of the allowance for loan losses among the various categories of loans and certain other information as of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, respectively. The total allowance is available to absorb losses from any portfolio of loans.


	September 30, 2019						December 31, 2018						March 31, 2020						December 31, 2019
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		As a % of Loan Class		Loans as a % of Total Loans		Amount		As a % of Loan Class		Loans as a % of Total Loans		Amount		As a % of Loan Class		Loans as a % of Total Loans		Amount		As a % of Loan Class		Loans as a % of Total Loans
Commercial real estate loans	$	4,269	1.01	%	41	%	$	3,439	0.89	%	44	%	$	4,800	0.83	%	48	%	$	4,524	0.80	%	47	%
Commercial Business	1,398		1.21	%	11	%	1,829		1.52	%	14	%	1,771		1.18	%	12	%	1,409		1.01	%	11	%
Construction loans	1,585		1.01	%	15	%	1,732		1.16	%	17	%	1,706		1.17	%	12	%	1,389		0.93	%	12	%
Residential real estate loans	406		0.74	%	6	%	431		0.91	%	5	%	430		0.48	%	7	%	412		0.46	%	7	%
Loans to individuals	154		0.69	%	2	%	148		0.64	%	3	%	188		0.61	%	3	%	185		0.57	%	3	%
Subtotal	7,812		1.01	%	75	%	7,579		1.09	%	83	%	8,895		0.90	%	82	%	7,919		0.81	%	80	%
Mortgage warehouse lines	1,137		0.45	%	25	%	731		0.47	%	17	%	1,027		0.18	%	18	%	1,083		0.46	%	20	%
Unallocated reserves	28		—		—		92		—		—		79		—		—		269		—		—
Total	$	8,977	0.88	%	100	%	$	8,402	0.95	%	100	%	$	10,001	0.82	%	100	%	$	9,271	0.76	%	100	%

For the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2019,~~2020, the Company recorded a provision for loan losses of ~~$1.1 million,~~$895,000, charge-offs of ~~$481,000 and recoveries of loans previously charged-off of $6,000~~$165,000 compared to a provision for loan losses of ~~$675,000,~~$300,000, no charge-offs ~~of $499,000~~ and

recoveries of loans previously charged-off of ~~$76,000~~$2,000 recorded for the

first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2018.~~2019. The higher provision for loan losses recorded for the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2019~~2020 was due primarily to an additional provision of approximately $388,000 related to an increase in the qualitative factors as a result of a weakening national and local economic environment resulting from the existing and anticipated impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and, to a lesser extent, the growth ~~of the loan portfolio year over year~~ and ~~the~~ change in the mix of ~~loans in~~ the loan portfolio.

At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the allowance for loan losses was ~~$9.0~~$10.0 million, or ~~0.88%~~0.82% of loans, compared to ~~$8.4~~$9.3 million, or ~~0.95%~~0.76% of loans, at December 31, ~~2018~~2019 and ~~$8.3~~$8.7 million, or ~~0.94%~~1.00% of loans, at ~~September 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. The allowance for loan losses was ~~170.5%~~75.8% of non-performing loans at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~127.7%~~206.2% of non-performing loans at December 31, 2018 and ~~122.3%~~248.8% of non-performing loans at ~~September 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019.

Management believes ~~that the quality of the loan portfolio remains sound, considering the economic climate in New Jersey and the New York City metropolitan area and~~ that the allowance for loan losses is adequate in relation to credit risk exposure levels and the estimated incurred and inherent losses in the loan ~~portfolio.~~portfolio at March 31, 2020. However, it is expected that the economic disruption resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic will more significantly impact businesses, borrowers, employees and consumers in the second quarter of 2020, which may continue with increasing severity in future periods. Management may further increase the provision for loan losses and the allowance for loan losses in response to changes in economic conditions and the performance of the loan portfolio in future periods.

Deposits

Deposits, which include demand deposits (interest bearing and non-interest bearing), savings deposits and time deposits, are a fundamental and cost-effective source of funding. The flow of deposits is influenced significantly by general economic conditions, changes in market interest rates and competition. The Company offers a variety of products designed to attract and retain customers, with the Company’s primary focus on the building and expanding of long-term relationships.

The following table summarizes deposits at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018:~~2019:


(Dollars in thousands)	September 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		March 31, 2020		December 31, 2019
Demand
Non-interest bearing	$	217,555	$	212,981	$	299,147	$	287,555
Interest bearing	343,684		323,503		397,236		393,392
Savings	196,834		189,612		266,295		259,033
Certificates of deposit	264,986		224,576		335,354		337,382
Total	$	1,023,059	$	950,672	$	1,298,032	$	1,277,362

At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, total deposits were ~~$1.02~~$1.30 billion, an increase of ~~$72.4~~$20.7 million, or ~~7.6%~~1.6%, from ~~$950.7 million~~$1.28 billion at December 31, ~~2018. Certificates of deposit increased $40.4 million, non-interest~~2019. Non-interest bearing demand deposits increased ~~$4.6~~$11.6 million, interest-bearing demand deposits increased ~~$20.2~~$3.8 million and savings deposits increased ~~$7.2~~$7.3 while certificates of deposit decreased $2.0 million when compared to the levels at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019.

The COVID-19 pandemic may impact the Bank’s ability to increase and or retain customers’ deposits. If the pandemic continues for an extended period of time, businesses may experience a loss of revenue and consumers may experience a reduction of income, which may cause them to withdraw their funds to pay expenses or reduce their ability to increase their deposits.

Borrowings

Borrowings are mainly comprised of Federal Home Loan Bank of New York (“FHLB”) borrowings and overnight funds purchased. These borrowings are primarily used to fund asset growth not supported by deposit generation. At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the Company had ~~$116.8~~$94.1 million of short-term borrowings from the FHLB ~~and $21.0 million of federal funds purchased~~ compared to ~~$71.8~~$92.1 million of short-term borrowings from the FHLB at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. In April 2020 the Bank began participating in the Federal Reserve's Paycheck Protection Program Liquidity Facility ("PPPLF"), which is a liquidity and borrowing program to allow participating banks to borrow 100% of the PPP loans funded at an interest rate of 0.35% for up to two years.

Liquidity

At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the amount of liquid assets and the Bank’s access to off-balance sheet liquidity remained at a level management deemed adequate to ensure that contractual liabilities, depositors’ withdrawal requirements and other operational and customer credit needs could be satisfied.

Liquidity management refers to the Company’s ability to support asset growth while satisfying the borrowing needs and deposit withdrawal requirements of customers. In addition to maintaining liquid assets, factors such as capital position, profitability, asset

quality and availability of funding affect a bank’s ability to meet its liquidity needs. On the asset side, liquid funds are maintained in the form of cash and cash equivalents, federal funds sold, investment securities held to maturity maturing within one year, securities available for sale and loans held for sale. Additional asset-based liquidity is derived from scheduled loan repayments as well as investment repayments of principal and interest. Investment securities and loans may also be pledged to the FHLB to collateralize additional borrowings. On the liability side, the primary source of liquidity is the ability to generate core deposits. Long-term and short-term borrowings are used as supplemental funding sources when growth in the core deposit base does not keep pace with that of interest-earning assets.

The Bank has established a borrowing relationship with the FHLB that further supports and enhances liquidity. The FHLB provides member banks with a fully secured line of credit of up to 50% of a bank’s quarter-end total assets. Under the terms of this facility, the Bank’s total credit exposure to the FHLB cannot exceed 50% of its total assets, or ~~$671.3~~$805.4 million, at ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. In addition, the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Bank’s advances, letters of credit, the dollar amount of the FHLB’s minimum collateral requirement for off-balance sheet financial contracts and advance commitments cannot exceed 30% of the Bank’s total assets, unless the Bank obtains approval from the FHLB’s Board of Directors or its Executive Committee. These limits are further restricted by a member’s ability to provide eligible collateral to support its obligations to the FHLB as well as the ability to meet the FHLB’s stock requirement. At ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank pledged approximately ~~$298.8~~$385.5 million and ~~$270.9~~$308.5 million of loans, respectively, to support the FHLB borrowing capacity. At ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank had available borrowing capacity of ~~$95.4~~$168.2 million and $131.2 million, respectively, at the FHLB. The Bank also maintains unsecured federal funds lines of $46.0 million with two correspondent banks, ~~$25 million~~all of which were unused and available at ~~September~~March 31, 2020.

At April 30, ~~2019.~~2020 the Bank had an outstanding balance of $40.1 million with the Federal Reserve Bank under the PPPLF program. The Bank may borrow additional funds under this facility up to 100% of the PPP loans. In addition, the Bank has access to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York Discount Window facility. At this time the Bank has not pledged investment securities or loans, which would be required, to support borrowings through the Discount Window facility.

The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows present the changes in cash from operating, investing and financing activities. At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the balance of cash and cash equivalents was ~~$20.8~~$12.0 million.

Net cash ~~provided by~~used in operating activities totaled ~~$6.9~~$1.5 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to net cash provided by operating activities of ~~$12.2~~$5.1 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. A source of funds is net income from operations adjusted for activity related to loans originated for sale and sold, the provision for loan losses, depreciation and amortization expenses and net amortization of premiums and discounts on securities. Net cash ~~provided by~~used in operating activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019 was lower than~~March 31, 2020 compared to net cash provided by operating activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 was due primarily to ~~higher~~the net ~~proceeds from originations and~~funding of loans held for sale of ~~loans of~~ approximately ~~$3.5~~$4.4 million in the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2018. The net decrease in accrued expenses and other liabilities~~2020 compared to ~~the~~ net ~~increase in accrued expenses and other liabilities~~sales of loans held for sale of approximately $2.9 million in the ~~2018 period also contributed to the decrease in cash flows from operating activities in the 2019 period.~~first three months of 2019.

Net cash used in investing activities totaled ~~$139.6~~$23.0 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~net cash used by investing activities of $21.7~~$1.0 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. The loans and securities portfolios are a source of liquidity, providing cash flows from maturities and periodic payments of principal. The primary use of cash ~~from~~by investing activities for the three months ended March 31, 2020 was the purchase of $35.1 million of investment securities compared to $23.7 million in the first ~~nine~~three months of ~~2019~~2019. Partially offsetting these purchases was ~~a net increase in loans~~$14.9 million of ~~$142.1 million compared to a net increase in loans of $19.4 million for the first nine months of 2018. For the nine months ended September 30, 2019 and 2018,~~ payments, calls and maturities of investment securities ~~totaled $41.6~~in the first quarter of 2020 compared to $11.7 million of payments, calls and ~~$34.9 million, respectively. Cash was used to purchase investment securities~~maturities in the first quarter of ~~$37.6 million for~~2019. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020, net loans increased $1.8 million compared to ~~purchases~~a decrease in net loans of ~~$33.0~~$8.9 million ~~of investment securities for~~during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. There were no sales of investment securities in the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and ~~2018.~~2019.

Net cash provided by financing activities was ~~$136.6~~$21.7 million for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 compared to ~~$10.0~~$5.8 million used in financing activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2018.~~March 31, 2019. The primary source of funds for the ~~2019~~2020 period was the increase in both the deposits and short-term borrowings of ~~$72.4~~$20.7 million and ~~$66.0~~$2.1 million, respectively. ~~Cash dividends of $1.9 million were paid in the first nine months of 2019.~~ The primary ~~source~~use of funds for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September 30, 2018~~March 31, 2019 was the ~~$79.0~~$49.7 million ~~increase~~reduction in short-term borrowings, which was partially offset by ~~the decrease~~an increase in deposits of ~~$67.6~~$44.5 million. Management believes that the Company’s and the Bank’s liquidity resources are adequate to provide for the Company’s and the Bank’s planned operations.

Shareholders’ Equity and Dividends

Shareholders’ equity increased by ~~$11.4~~$2.5 million, or ~~9.0%~~1.5%, to ~~$138.5~~$173.1 million at ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 from ~~$127.1~~$170.6 million at December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. The increase in shareholders’ equity was due primarily to an increase of ~~$8.4~~$2.5 million in retained ~~earnings, a $2.0 million increase in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and $1.0 million increase in common stock due to exercising of stock options and share-based compensation.~~earnings.

The Company began declaring and paying cash dividends on its common stock in September 2016 and has declared and paid a cash dividend for each quarter since then. The timing and the amount of the payment of future cash dividends, if any, on the Company’s

common stock will be at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors and will be determined after consideration of various factors, including the level of earnings, cash requirements, regulatory capital and financial condition.

The Company’s common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol, “FCCY.”

On January 21, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a common stock repurchase program. Under the common stock repurchase program, the Company may repurchase in the open market or privately negotiated transactions up to 5% of its common stock outstanding on the date of approval of the stock repurchase program, which limitation is adjusted for any subsequent stock dividends.

In the first quarter of 2020, 6,028 shares of common stock were repurchased to satisfy income tax withholding requirements on taxable income from the vesting of restricted share grants.

Disclosure of repurchases of shares of common stock of the Company that were made during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 is set forth under Part II, Item 2 of this Form 10-Q, “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.”

Capital Resources

The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking agencies. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory, and possibly additional discretionary, actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Company and the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the Company’s and the Bank’s assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. The Company’s and the Bank’s capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require the Company and the Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Common Equity Tier 1, Total and Tier I capital (as defined in the regulations) to risk-weighted assets (as defined) and Tier I capital to average assets (Leverage ratio, as defined). As of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they were subject.

To be categorized as adequately capitalized, the Company and the Bank must maintain minimum Common Equity Tier 1, Total capital to risk-weighted assets, Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and Tier I leverage capital ratios as set forth in the below table. As of ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 and December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, the Bank’s capital ratios exceeded the regulatory standards for well-capitalized institutions. Certain bank regulatory limitations exist on the availability of the Bank’s assets for the payment of dividends by the Bank without prior approval of bank regulatory authorities.

In July 2013, the Federal Reserve Board and the FDIC approved revisions to their capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action rules that implemented and addressed the revised standards of Basel III and addressed relevant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The Federal Reserve Board’s final rules and the FDIC’s interim final rules (which became final in April 2014 with no substantive changes) apply to all depository institutions, top-tier bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $500 million or more (which was subsequently increased to $1 billion or more in May 2015) and top-tier savings and loan holding companies (“banking organizations”). Among other things, the rules established a Common Equity Tier 1 minimum capital requirement (4.5% of risk-weighted assets) and increased the minimum Tier 1 capital to risk-based assets requirement (from 4% to 6% of risk-weighted assets). Banking organizations are also required to have a total capital ratio of at least 8% and a Tier 1 leverage ratio of at least 4%.

The rules also limited a banking organization’s ability to pay dividends, engage in share repurchases or pay discretionary bonuses if the banking organization does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of 2.5% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The rules became effective for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 2015. The capital conservation buffer requirement began phasing in on January 1, 2016 at 0.625% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets and ~~increases~~increased by that amount each year until fully implemented in January 2019 at 2.5% of Common Equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets. At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the Company and the Bank maintained a capital conservation buffer in excess of 2.5%.

Management believes that the Company’s and the Bank’s capital resources are adequate to support the Company’s and the Bank’s current strategic and operating ~~plans, including~~plans. However, if the ~~Shore Merger.~~financial position of the Company and the Bank are materially adversely impacted by the economic disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Company and or the Bank may be required to increase its regulatory capital position.

The Company’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table:


	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provision		Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes				To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provision
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount	Ratio	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount	Ratio
As of September 30, 2019
As of March 31, 2020
Common equity Tier 1 (CET1)	$	125,118	10.53	%	$	53,451	4.50	%	N/A	N/A	$	135,817	9.84	%	$	62,122	4.50	%	N/A	N/A
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	152,095		12.80	%	95,024		8.00	%	N/A	N/A	163,818		11.87	%	110,439		8.00	%	N/A	N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	143,118		12.05	%	71,268		6.00	%	N/A	N/A	153,817		11.14	%	82,829		6.00	%	N/A	N/A
Tier 1 leverage capital	143,118		11.45	%	50,018		4.00	%	N/A	N/A	153,817		10.17	%	60,521		4.00	%	N/A	N/A

As of December 31, 2018
As of December 31, 2019:
Common equity Tier 1 (CET1)	$	115,537	10.72	%	$	48,484	4.50	%	N/A	N/A	$	133,046	9.70	%	$	61,604	4.50	%	N/A	N/A
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	141,939		13.17	%	86,194		8.00	%	N/A	N/A	160,317		11.69	%	109,519		8.00	%	N/A	N/A
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	133,537		12.39	%	64,645		6.00	%	N/A	N/A	151,046		11.01	%	82,139		6.00	%	N/A	N/A
Tier 1 leverage capital	133,537		11.73	%	45,538		4.00	%	N/A	N/A	151,046		10.56	%	57,245		4.00	%	N/A	N/A

The Bank’s actual capital amounts and ratios are presented in the following table:


	Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes			To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provision			Actual				For Capital Adequacy Purposes			To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provision
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio	Amount		Ratio	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio	Amount		Ratio
As of September 30, 2019
As of March 31, 2020
Common equity Tier 1 (CET1)	$	142,839	12.03	%	$	53,426	4.50%	$	77,171	6.50%	$	153,586	11.13	%	$	62,097	4.50%	$	89,696	6.50%
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	151,816		12.79	%	94,980		8.00%	118,725		10.00%	163,587		11.85	%	110,395		8.00%	137,993		10.00%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	142,839		12.03	%	71,235		6.00%	94,980		8.00%	153,586		11.13	%	82,796		6.00%	110,395		8.00%
Tier 1 leverage capital	142,839		11.43	%	49,996		4.00%	62,495		5.00%	153,586		10.15	%	60,498		4.00%	75,623		5.00%

As of December 31, 2018
As of December 31, 2019:
Common equity Tier 1 (CET1)	$	133,548	12.40	%	$	48,459	4.50%	$	69,996	6.50%	$	150,725	10.99	%	$	61,579	4.50%	$	88,948	6.50%
Total capital to risk-weighted assets	141,950		13.18	%	86,149		8.00%	107,687		10.00%	159,996		11.67	%	109,474		8.00%	136,843		10.00%
Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets	133,548		12.40	%	64,612		6.00%	86,149		8.00%	150,725		10.99	%	82,106		6.00%	109,474		8.00%
Tier 1 leverage capital	133,548		11.74	%	45,516		4.00%	56,894		5.00%	150,725		10.54	%	57,222		4.00%	71,528		5.00%

Interest Rate Sensitivity Analysis

The largest component of the Company’s total income is net interest income, and the majority of the Company’s financial instruments are composed of interest rate-sensitive assets and liabilities with various terms and maturities. The primary objective of management is to maximize net interest income while minimizing interest rate risk. Interest rate risk is derived from timing differences and the magnitude of relative changes in the repricing of assets and liabilities, loan prepayments, deposit withdrawals and differences in lending and funding rates. Management actively seeks to monitor and control the mix of interest rate-sensitive assets and interest rate-sensitive liabilities.

Under the interest rate risk policy established by the Company’s Board of Directors, the Company established quantitative guidelines with respect to interest rate risk and how interest rate shocks are projected to affect net interest income and the economic value of equity. Summarized below is the projected effect of a parallel shift of an increase of 200 and 300 basis points, ~~and decrease of 200 basis points,~~ respectively, in market interest rates on net interest income and the economic value of equity. Due to the historically low interest rate environment at March 31, 2020 a parallel shift down was not presented.

Based upon the current interest rate environment, as of ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, sensitivity to interest rate risk was as follows:


(Dollars in thousands)			Next 12 Months Net Interest Income							Economic Value of Equity ⁽²⁾							Next 12 Months Net Interest Income						Economic Value of Equity ⁽²⁾
Interest Rate Change in Basis Points ⁽¹⁾	Dollar Amount		$ Change			% Change		Dollar Amount		$ Change			% Change		Dollar Amount		$ Change		% Change		Dollar Amount		$ Change			% Change
+300	$	51,594	$	3,447		7.16	%	$	163,938	$	(1,651	)	(1.00	)%	$	55,541	$	1,627	3.02	%	$	198,001	$	(6,086	)	(2.98	)%
+200	50,518		2,371			4.92	%	165,996		407			0.25	%	54,721		807		1.50	%	200,604		(3,483		)	(1.71	)%
—	48,147		—			—	%	165,589		—			—	%	53,914		—		—	%	204,087		—			—	%
-200	45,956		(2,191		)	(4.55	)%	158,467		(7,122		)	(4.30	)%


⁽¹⁾	Assumes an instantaneous and parallel shift in interest rates at all maturities.


⁽²⁾	Economic value of equity is the discounted present value of expected cash flows from assets, liabilities and off-balance sheet contracts.

The Company employs many assumptions to calculate the impact of changes in interest rates on assets and liabilities, and actual results may not be similar to projections due to several factors, including the timing and frequency of rate changes, market conditions and the shape of the yield curve. Actual results may also differ due to management’s actions, if any, in response to changing rates. In calculating these exposures, the Company utilized an interest rate simulation model that is validated by third-party reviewers periodically.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

As of ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, there were no material changes to the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements and contractual obligations disclosed under Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report Form 10-K (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation) for the year ended December 31, ~~2018.~~2019. Management continues to believe that the Company has adequate capital and liquidity available from various sources to fund projected contractual obligations and commitments.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

The Company’s Asset Liability Committee (“ALCO”) is responsible for developing, implementing and monitoring asset liability management strategies and advising the Company’s Board of Directors on such strategies, as well as the related level of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk simulation models are prepared on a quarterly basis. These models demonstrate balance sheet gaps and predict changes to net interest income and the economic market value of equity under various interest rate scenarios.

ALCO is generally authorized to manage interest rate risk through the management of capital, cash flows and duration of assets and liabilities, including sales and purchases of assets, as well as additions of borrowings and other sources of medium or longer-term funding.

The following strategies are among those used to manage interest rate risk:

Actively market commercial business loan originations, which tend to have adjustable rate features and which generate customer relationships that can result in higher core deposit accounts;

Actively market commercial mortgage loan originations, which tend to have shorter maturity terms and higher interest rates than residential mortgage loans and which generate customer relationships that can result in higher core deposit accounts;

Actively market core deposit relationships, which are generally longer duration liabilities;

Utilize short term and long-term certificates of deposit and/or borrowings to manage liability duration;

Closely monitor and actively manage the investment portfolio, including management of duration, prepayment and interest rate risk;

Maintain adequate levels of capital; and

Utilize loan sales and/or loan participations.

ALCO uses simulation modeling to analyze the Company’s net interest income sensitivity as well as the Company’s economic value of portfolio equity under various interest rate scenarios. The model is based on the actual maturity and estimated repricing characteristics of rate sensitive assets and liabilities. The model incorporates certain prepayment and interest rate assumptions, which management believes to be reasonable as of ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020. The model assumes changes in interest rates without any proactive change in the balance sheet by management. In the model, the forecasted shape of the yield curve remained static as of ~~September 30, 2019.~~March 31, 2020.

In an immediate and sustained 200 basis point increase in market interest rates at ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, net interest income for ~~year 1~~the next 12 months would increase approximately ~~4.9%~~1.5%, when compared to a flat interest rate scenario. ~~In an immediate and sustained 200 basis point decrease in market interest rates, net interest income for year 1 would decrease approximately 4.6%.~~

Certain shortcomings are inherent in the methodologies used in determining interest rate risk. Simulation modeling requires making certain assumptions that may or may not reflect the manner in which actual yields and costs respond to changes in market interest rates. In this regard, the modeling assumes that the composition of our interest-sensitive assets and liabilities existing at the beginning of a period remains constant over the period being measured and assumes that a particular change in interest rates is reflected uniformly across the yield curve regardless of the duration or repricing of specific assets and liabilities. Accordingly, although the information provides an indication of our interest rate risk exposure at a particular point in time, such measurements are not intended to, and do not, provide a precise forecast of the effect of changes in market interest rates on our net interest income and will differ from actual results.

Model simulation results indicate the Company is asset sensitive, which indicates the Company’s net interest income should increase in a rising rate environment and decline in a falling interest rate environment. Management believes the Company’s interest rate risk position is balanced and reasonable.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, with the assistance of other members of management, have evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based upon such evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.

Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Because of inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving disclosure controls and procedures objectives. Management necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended ~~September 30, 2019~~March 31, 2020 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company may, in the ordinary course of business, become a party to litigation involving collection matters, contract claims and other legal proceedings relating to the conduct of its business. Management is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings against the Company which, if determined adversely, would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

As of ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, there has been no material change in the risk factors previously disclosed under Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (Risk Factors) for the year ended December 31, ~~2018,~~2019, as filed with the SEC on March ~~15, 2019,~~16, 2020, other than the risks and uncertainties described below related to the ~~Shore Merger.~~Coronavirus pandemic.

~~Combining the two banks may be more difficult, costly or time consuming than expected,~~The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and the ~~expected benefits~~measures implemented in response intended to prevent its spread have adversely affected, and are likely to continue to adversely affect, our business, results of operations and financial condition, the ultimate impact of which will depend on future developments that are highly uncertain and are difficult to predict at this time.

The outbreak of a strain of the ~~Merger may not~~Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) originating from Wuhan, China has caused global disruption in the financial markets and our primary market is increasingly threatened by the potential spread of this virus. On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the rapidly spreading COVID-19 outbreak to be ~~realized.~~a global pandemic. The ultimate impact of COVID-19 is uncertain at this time, but the known effects of, and risks posed by, the pandemic are discussed below.

~~Cost or difficulties relating~~In response to ~~integration matters might be greater than expected~~public health concerns resulting from the pandemic, governments around the world have implemented a variety of precautionary measures to reduce the spread of COVID-19, including travel restrictions and bans, instructions to residents to practice social distancing, quarantine advisories, shelter-in-place orders and required closures of non-essential businesses. These government mandates have forced many of our customers and vendors, which are primarily located in northern and central New Jersey, communities along the New Jersey shore and the ~~Company~~New York City metropolitan area, to seek government support in order to continue operating, to curtail drastically their service offerings or to cease operations entirely.

In addition, these measures have negatively affected, and may further affect, consumer sentiment and discretionary spending patterns, economies and financial markets, and our workforce, operations and customers. Among other measures, we have implemented work-from-home for our employees whose jobs can be ~~unable~~performed remotely, provided employees who are not working remotely with appropriate protective equipment and supplies, adjusted branch hours and temporarily closed all of our branch lobbies, except on an appointment only basis. These changes in our operations in response to ~~realize expected cost savings~~COVID-19 have impacted the way that we operate and ~~synergies from the Shore Merger in the amounts~~conduct business, and ~~in the timeframe anticipated. For example, it is possible that the integration process could~~may result in additional inefficiencies or delays, including additional costs related to business continuity initiatives, which cannot be avoided or alleviated through succession planning, employees working remotely or teleconferencing technologies. In recent weeks, the ~~loss~~pandemic has also caused significant volatility in financial markets, including the market price of key employees, the disruption of the Company’s ongoing business or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that adversely affect the combined bank’s ability to maintain relationships with customers and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits and cost savings of the Shore Merger. The loss of key employees could adversely affect the Company’s ability to successfully conduct its business in the markets in which Shore operated, which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s financial results and the value of itsour common stock.

The immediate consequences of and responses to the pandemic, including the public health problems resulting from COVID-19 and precautionary measures instituted by governments and businesses to mitigate its spread, have raised the prospect of an extended global recession, which would adversely impact the businesses of our customers, clients, counterparties and service providers, as well as other market participants, and would further disrupt our operations. Other known impacts and anticipated risks of the COVID-19 pandemic include, but are not limited to, the following:

We primarily operate in northern and central New Jersey, communities along the New Jersey shore and the New York City metropolitan area, which are among some of the most affected areas in the U.S. and, accordingly, are the most likely geographies to remain subject to governmental restrictions aimed at curtailing household and non-essential business activity to contain COVID-19 for a prolonged period. The longer that our clients, customers, communities and business partners remain subject to such restrictions, the greater the likelihood that economic and demand uncertainty will increase, which would negatively impact, among other things, demand for and profitability of the Bank’s products and services and our liquidity, regulatory capital and growth strategy.

Concern about the spread of COVID-19 and the measures enacted to mitigate its spread have already caused and are likely to continue to cause business shutdowns and interruptions, increased unemployment, labor shortages and commercial property vacancies, and supply chain disruptions, all of which contribute to economic and financial market instability and which, in turn, could impact the ability of our customers to make scheduled loan payments. If the pandemic results in widespread and sustained repayment shortfalls on loans in our portfolio, we could incur significant delinquencies, foreclosures and credit losses, particularly if the available collateral is insufficient to cover our exposure.

Our financial performance, the ability of borrowers to pay interest on and repay principal of outstanding loans, and the value of the collateral securing such loans is highly dependent upon the business environment in the U.S. generally and in northern and central New Jersey, communities along the New Jersey shore and the New York City metropolitan area in particular. Further economic downturn resulting from the pandemic, particularly in our primary market areas, could negatively impact the collateral values associated with our existing loans, the ability to liquidate the real estate collateral securing our residential and commercial real estate loans, our ability to maintain loan origination volume and to obtain additional financing, and the financial condition and credit risk of our customers, among other credit risks.

Legislative responses and regulatory policy changes to protect borrowers, such as forbearance, waiver of late payment and other fees, and the suspension of foreclosures, may have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations. We may need to further increase the allowance for loan losses if borrowers experience financial difficulties beyond forbearance periods, which would adversely affect our net income.

To support our customers, businesses and communities, we are participating in the SBA’s Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) established under the CARES Act, notwithstanding that our participation in this federal relief program exposes the Company and the Bank to additional litigation risk. Several national banking associations have already been subject to litigation regarding their respective procedures for processing PPP applications. The Company and the Bank may be exposed to the risk of litigation, from both clients and non-clients that approached the Bank regarding PPP loans, regarding the manner in which we processed PPP applications. Any such litigation regardless of the outcome, may result in significant financial liability or adversely affect the Company’s ~~belief~~reputation.

Our participation in the PPP and any other relief programs established under the CARES Act further exposes us to certain credit risks. Among other regulatory requirements, PPP loans are subject to forbearance of loan payments for a six-month period to the extent that ~~cost savings and revenue enhancements~~loans are ~~achievable~~not eligible for forgiveness. If PPP borrowers fail to qualify for loan forgiveness, we have a greater risk of holding these loans at unfavorable interest rates as compared to the loans to customers that we would have otherwise extended credit. Additionally, there is risk that the SBA could conclude there is a ~~forward-looking statement~~deficiency in the manner in which the Bank originated, funded, or serviced PPP loans, which may or may not be related to the ambiguity in the CARES Act or the rules and guidance promulgated by the SBA and the U.S. Department of the Treasury thereunder regarding the operation of the PPP.

Our ability to meet customer servicing expectations may be limited due to certain operational risks as a result of our reduced hours, branch lobby closures and work-from-home policy, as described above, including reduced productivity in our workforce, less reliable and more limited access to the networks, information systems, applications and other tools available to employees, as well as increased cybersecurity and information security risk.

In addition, our reliance on third-party service providers and vendors exposes us to certain operational risks to the extent that ~~is inherently uncertain. The combined bank’s actual cost savings~~such service providers and ~~revenue enhancements,~~vendors continue to have limited capacities for a prolonged period or if ~~any,~~additional limitations or potential disruptions in these services materialize. By way of example, our business depends on vendors that supply essential services such as loan servicers, providers of financial information, systems and analytical tools and providers of electronic payment and settlement systems, among others. Without these services, we have experienced and will continue to experience delays in originating and closing loans.

During this challenging economic environment, our communities are increasingly relying on us to access necessary capital and our customers are more dependent on our credit commitments. Increased borrowings under these commitments could adversely impact our liquidity. Moreover, our management has been focused on meeting clients’ needs and mitigating the impact of the pandemic on our business, which has required and will continue to require a substantial investment of time and resources across our enterprise. This has resulted and can be expected to continue to result in a diversion of management attention.

Further volatility in interest rates caused by uncertainties stemming from COVID-19 could negatively impact our net interest income, lending activities, deposits and profitability.

While the full extent and impact of the pandemic cannot be ~~quantified~~reasonably estimated at this ~~time. Any actual cost savings~~time, it could have a material adverse impact on our consolidated business, results of operations and financial condition. To the extent the pandemic adversely affects our business, financial condition, liquidity or ~~revenue enhancements will depend~~results of operations, it may also enhance certain material risks relating to our business that are addressed at Item 1A Risk Factors in our Annual Report on ~~future expense levels~~Form 10-K filed for the year ended December 31, 2019 and ~~operating results, the timing of certain events and general industry, regulatory and business conditions. Many of these events will be beyond the control of the combined bank.~~in any subsequent Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

On January 21, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a common stock repurchase program. Under this common stock repurchase program, the Company may repurchase in the open market or privately negotiated transactions up to 5% of its common stock outstanding on the date of approval of the stock repurchase program, which limitation is adjusted for any subsequent stock dividends. The Company is authorized to repurchase up to 396,141 shares of common stock of the Company under the repurchase

program, representing 5% of the outstanding common stock of the Company on January 21, 2016, as adjusted for subsequent common stock dividends. At ~~September 30, 2019,~~March 31, 2020, the remaining number of shares that may be purchased under the stock repurchase program are ~~394,141. There were no repurchases~~388,113. In the first quarter of 2020, the Company repurchased 6,028 shares under the stock repurchase program ~~during the first nine months of 2019.~~from employees to withhold and remit income taxes.



Period		Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid Per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased As Part of Publicly Announced Program	Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet be Purchased Under the Program
Beginning	Ending
January 1, 2020	January 31, 2020	6,028	$	22.35	—	388,113
February 1, 2020	February 29, 2020	—	—		—	388,113
March 1, 2020	March 31, 2020	—	—		—	388,113
Total		6,028	$	22.35	—	388,113

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

None.

Item 6. Exhibits.




3(i)		Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (conformed copy) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(A) to the Company’s Form 10-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 27, 2009)

3(ii)		By-laws of the Company, as amended (conformed copy) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) to the Company’s Annual Report Form 10-K (SEC File No. 000-32891) filed with the SEC on March 15, 2019)

31.1	*	Certification of Robert F. Mangano, principal executive officer of the Company, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)

31.2	*	Certification of Stephen J. Gilhooly, principal financial officer of the Company, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)

32	*	Certifications pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Robert F. Mangano, principal executive officer of the Company, and Stephen J. Gilhooly, principal financial officer of the Company

101.INS	*	Inline XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH	*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL	*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF	*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB	*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE	*	Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

104		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

_____________________

* Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.



		1ST CONSTITUTION BANCORP


Date:	~~November 8, 2019~~May 11, 2020	By:	/s/ ROBERT F. MANGANO
			Robert F. Mangano
			President and Chief Executive Officer
			(Principal Executive Officer)


Date:	~~November 8, 2019~~May 11, 2020	By:	/s/ STEPHEN J. GILHOOLY
			Stephen J. Gilhooly
			Senior Vice President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer
			(Principal Financial Officer)

6263



Non-cash items:
Transfer of loans to other real estate owned	—	1,460
Right-of-use assets	15,080	—
Lease liability	15,699	—

Acquisition of New Jersey Community Bank
Noncash assets acquired:
Investment securities available for sale		$	11,173
Loans		75,144
Premises and equipment, net		1,120
Bank-owned life insurance		3,972
Accrued interest receivable		259
Core deposit intangible asset		80
Other real estate owned		1,230
Other assets		1,601
		$	94,579
Liabilities assumed :
Deposits		$	87,223
Other liabilities		636
		$	87,859

Common stock issued as consideration		$	5,494



	Three months ended						Nine months ended
	September 30,						September 30,
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)	2019			2018			2019			2018
Adjusted net income
Net income	$	3,623		$	4,011		$	10,390		$	8,735
Adjustments:
Merger-related expense	302			—			575			2,141
Gain from bargain purchase	—			—			—			(184		)
Income tax effect of adjustments	(37		)	—			(119		)	(568		)
Adjusted net income	$	3,888		$	4,011		$	10,846		$	10,124

Adjusted net income per diluted share
Adjusted net income	$	3,888		$	4,011		$	10,846		$	10,124
Diluted shares outstanding	8,722,349			8,678,680			8,698,959			8,565,401
Adjusted net income per diluted share	$	0.45		$	0.46		$	1.25		$	1.18

Adjusted return on average total assets
Adjusted net income	$	3,888		$	4,011		$	10,846		$	10,124
Average assets	1,264,298			1,187,522			1,221,410			1,132,045
Adjusted return on average total assets	1.22		%	1.34		%	1.19		%	1.20		%

Adjusted return on average shareholders' equity
Adjusted net income	$	3,888		$	4,011		$	10,846		$	10,124
Average equity	135,975			123,420			132,079			117,484
Adjusted return on average shareholders' equity	11.34		%	12.89		%	10.98		%	11.52		%

Book value and tangible book value per share
Shareholders' equity							$	138,527		$	123,774
Less: goodwill and intangible assets							12,165			12,294
Tangible shareholders' equity							126,362			111,480
Shares outstanding							8,682,401			8,404,292
Book value per share							$	15.95		$	14.73
Tangible book value per share							$	14.55		$	13.26



	Nine months ended September 30, 2019							Nine months ended September 30, 2018
(Dollars in thousands except yield/cost information)	Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield		Average Balance			Interest		Average Yield
Assets
Interest-earning assets:
Federal funds sold/short-term investments	$	7,140		$	129	2.42	%	$	21,287		$	208	1.31	%
Investment securities:
Taxable	162,809			3,615		2.96	%	146,003			2,915		2.66	%
Tax-exempt (1)	56,723			1,590		3.74	%	76,872			1,922		3.33	%
Total investment securities	219,532			5,205		3.16	%	222,875			4,837		2.89	%
Loans: (2)
Commercial real estate	400,096			15,494		5.11	%	349,423			13,391		5.05	%
Mortgage warehouse lines	155,962			6,682		5.71	%	157,422			6,318		5.35	%
Construction	157,245			8,135		6.92	%	135,049			6,548		6.48	%
Commercial business	120,774			5,386		5.96	%	110,101			4,391		5.33	%
Residential real estate	50,562			1,682		4.39	%	45,955			1,517		4.35	%
Loans to individuals	21,748			827		5.01	%	23,386			780		4.40	%
Loans held for sale	3,556			107		4.01	%	3,067			101		4.39	%
All other loans	1,032			29		3.71	%	1,132			32		3.73	%
Total loans	910,975			38,342		5.63	%	825,535			33,078		5.31	%
Total interest-earning assets	1,137,647			$	43,676	5.13	%	1,069,697			$	38,123	4.73	%
Non-interest-earning assets:
Allowance for loan losses	(8,693		)					(8,295		)
Cash and due from banks	11,270							5,782
Other assets	81,186							64,861
Total non-interest-earning assets	83,763							62,348
Total assets	$	1,221,410						$	1,132,045
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity
Interest-bearing liabilities:
Money market and NOW accounts	$	337,004		$	1,977	0.78	%	$	362,048		$	1,437	0.53	%
Savings accounts	190,589			1,380		0.97	%	208,780			1,079		0.69	%
Certificates of deposit	268,851			4,535		2.26	%	180,250			2,026		1.50	%
Short-term borrowings	36,992			698		2.52	%	36,407			576		2.12	%
Redeemable subordinated debentures	18,557			575		4.13	%	18,557			508		3.65	%
Total interest-bearing liabilities	851,993			$	9,165	1.44	%	806,042			$	5,626	0.93	%
Non-interest-bearing liabilities:
Demand deposits	214,618							199,953
Other liabilities	22,720							8,566
Total non-interest-bearing liabilities	237,338							208,519
Shareholders’ equity	132,079							117,484
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,221,410						$	1,132,045
Net interest spread (3)						3.69	%						3.80	%
Net interest income and margin (4)				$	34,511	4.06	%				$	32,497	4.06	%