UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x
ýQUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2016

2017

OR

¨
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 000-54376

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Maryland90-0413866

Maryland90-0413866
(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. EmployerIdentification No.)
  

400 South El Camino Real,

66 Bovet Road, Suite 1100

100

San Mateo, California, 94402

(650) 343-9300
(Address of Principal Executive Offices; Zip Code)(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   xý     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site,website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes   xý     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filed, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company”, and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filer¨
    
Non-accelerated filer
¨   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Smaller reporting companyxý
Emerging growth company¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ¨     No   xý

As of May 6, 20161, 2017, there were 11,007,22710,906,370 shares of the Registrant’sregistrant’s common stock issued and outstanding.





STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC.

INDEX

AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
 Page
  
  
Item 1.
   
 2
   
 3
   
 4
   
 5
   
 6
   
Item 2.29
   
Item 3.38
   
Item 4.38
   
Item 1.39
   
Item 1A.39
   
Item 2.39
   
Item 3.40
   
Item 4.40
   
Item 5.40
   
Item 6.40
  
 41

EX-10-1

EX-10.2

EX-31.1

EX-31.2

EX-32.1

EX-32.2





PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the three months ended March 31, 2016,2017, have been prepared by Strategic Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K as of and for the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, as filed with the SEC on March 30, 201624, 2017 (the “2015“2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K”). The condensed consolidated financial statements herein should also be read in conjunction with the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 20162017, are not necessarily indicative of the operating results expected for the full year. The information furnished in the Company’s accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheets and unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations, equity, and cash flows reflects all adjustments that, are, in management’s opinion, are necessary for a fair presentation of the aforementioned financial statements. Such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature.

1


ITEM 1. UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED

CONDENDSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

  March 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
ASSETS        
Investments in real estate        
Land $15,981,000  $15,981,000 
Building and improvements  56,158,000   56,158,000 
Tenant improvements  3,577,000   3,676,000 
   75,716,000   75,815,000 
Accumulated depreciation  (10,612,000)  (10,068,000)
Investments in real estate, net  65,104,000   65,747,000 
Properties under development and development costs        
Land  25,851,000   - 
Buildings  613,000   - 
Development costs  901,000   - 
Properties under development and development costs  27,365,000   - 
Cash and cash equivalents  3,414,000   8,793,000 
Restricted cash  6,025,000   2,693,000 
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net  558,000   731,000 
Tenant receivables, net  1,212,000   1,664,000 
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures  6,645,000   6,902,000 
Lease intangibles, net  4,081,000   4,290,000 
Assets held for sale  9,752,000   9,769,000 
Deferred financing costs, net  487,000   579,000 
TOTAL ASSETS $124,643,000  $101,168,000 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY        
LIABILITIES        
Notes payable, net $58,509,000  $34,052,000 
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  1,145,000   1,486,000 
Amounts due to affiliates  184,000   49,000 
Other liabilities  1,090,000   1,479,000 
Liabilities related to assets held for sale  6,859,000   6,909,000 
Below market lease intangibles, net  3,231,000   3,303,000 
Deferred gain on sale of properties to unconsolidated joint venture  1,227,000   1,225,000 
TOTAL LIABILITIES  72,245,000   48,503,000 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)        
EQUITY        
Stockholders' equity        
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding  -   - 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized; 11,007,227 and 11,037,948 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively  111,000   111,000 
Additional paid-in capital  96,482,000   96,684,000 
Accumulated deficit  (46,187,000)  (46,124,000)
Total stockholders' equity  50,406,000   50,671,000 
Non-controlling interests  1,992,000   1,994,000 
TOTAL EQUITY  52,398,000   52,665,000 
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY $124,643,000  $101,168,000 

(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
 March 31, December 31,
 2017 2016
ASSETS   
Investments in real estate   
Land$22,365
 $15,510
Building and improvements57,395
 47,810
Tenant improvements2,926
 2,307
 82,686
 65,627
Accumulated depreciation(8,770) (8,163)
Investments in real estate, net73,916
 57,464
Properties under development and development costs   
Land25,851
 25,851
Buildings597
 601
Development costs5,645
 4,377
Properties under development and development costs32,093
 30,829
Cash and cash equivalents3,030
 3,130
Restricted cash3,867
 4,728
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net283
 1,070
Tenant receivables, net of $72 and $38 bad debt reserve912
 1,269
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures2,795
 4,761
Lease intangibles, net4,616
 3,825
Assets held for sale11,697
 24,157
Deferred financing costs, net1,486
 264
TOTAL ASSETS (1)
$134,695
 $131,497
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   
LIABILITIES   
Notes payable, net$61,734
 $54,304
Accounts payable and accrued expenses1,888
 2,955
Amounts due to affiliates114
 111
Other liabilities585
 461
Liabilities related to assets held for sale14,116
 22,182
Below-market lease liabilities, net3,061
 3,049
Deferred gain on sale of properties to unconsolidated joint venture668
 1,202
TOTAL LIABILITIES (1)
82,166
 84,264
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

 

EQUITY   
Stockholders’ equity   
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized, none issued and outstanding
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized; 10,906,370 and 10,938,245 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively111
 111
Additional paid-in capital95,829
 96,032
Accumulated deficit(45,382) (50,676)
Total stockholders’ equity50,558
 45,467
Non-controlling interests1,971
 1,766
TOTAL EQUITY52,529
 47,233
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY$134,695
 $131,497
(1)As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, includes approximately $34.4 million and $32.8 million, respectively, of assets related to consolidated variable interest entities that can be used only to settle obligations of the consolidated variable interest entities and approximately $19.6 million and $19.9 million, respectively, of liabilities of consolidated variable interest entities for which creditors do not have recourse to the general credit of the Company. Refer to Note 5. “Variable Interest Entities”.
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

2


STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

  Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2016  2015 
Revenue:        
Rental and reimbursements $2,708,000  $4,804,000 
Expense:        
Operating and maintenance  937,000   1,775,000 
General and administrative  396,000   766,000 
Depreciation and amortization  870,000   1,868,000 
Transaction expense  4,000   - 
Interest expense  600,000   1,694,000 
   2,807,000   6,103,000 
Operating loss  (99,000)  (1,299,000)
         
Other income (loss):        
Equity in income (losses) of unconsolidated joint ventures  26,000   (129,000)
Gain on disposal of real estate  9,000   4,783,000 
Loss on extinguishment of debt  (1,000)  (233,000)
Net income (loss)  (65,000)  3,122,000 
         
Net income (loss)  (65,000)  3,122,000 
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests  (2,000)  261,000 
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders $(63,000) $2,861,000 
         
Earnings (loss) per common share  ̶  basic and diluted $(0.01) $0.26 
         
Weighted average shares outstanding used to calculate earnings (loss) per common share - basic and diluted  11,037,189   10,969,714 

(in thousands, except shares and per share amounts)
(unaudited)
 Three Months Ended March 31,
 2017 2016
Revenue:   
Rental and reimbursements$2,640
 $2,708
    
Expense:   
Operating and maintenance946
 945
General and administrative495
 482
Depreciation and amortization962
 870
Transaction expense82
 4
Interest expense575
 600
 3,060
 2,901
Operating loss(420) (193)
    
Other income (loss):   
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures32
 26
Net gain on disposal of real estate6,586
 8
Income (loss) before income taxes6,198
 (159)
Income taxes(19) 94
Net income (loss)6,179
 (65)
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests230
 (2)
Net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders$5,949
 $(63)
    
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic and diluted$0.54
 $(0.01)
    
Weighted average shares outstanding used to calculate earnings (loss) per common share - basic and diluted10,937,451
 11,037,189
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

3


STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY

(Unaudited)

              Total       
  Number of     Additional  Accumulated  Stockholders'  Non-controlling  Total 
  Shares  Par Value  Paid-in Capital  Deficit  Equity  Interests  Equity 
BALANCE — December 31, 2015  11,037,948  $111,000  $96,684,000  $(46,124,000) $50,671,000  $1,994,000  $52,665,000 
Redemption of common shares  (30,721)  -   (202,000)  -   (202,000)  -   (202,000)
Net loss  -   -   -   (63,000)  (63,000)  (2,000)  (65,000)
BALANCE — March 31, 2016  11,007,227  $111,000  $96,482,000  $(46,187,000) $50,406,000  $1,992,000  $52,398,000 

(in thousands, except shares)
(unaudited)
 
Number of
Shares
 Par Value 
Additional
Paid-in Capital
 
Accumulated
Deficit
 
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
 
Non-controlling
Interests
 
Total
Equity
BALANCE — December 31, 201610,938,245
 $111
 $96,032
 $(50,676) $45,467
 $1,766
 $47,233
Redemption of common shares(31,875) 
 (203) 
 (203) 
 (203)
Quarterly distributions
 
 
 (655) (655) (25) (680)
Net income
 
 
 5,949
 5,949
 230
 6,179
BALANCE — March 31, 201710,906,370
 $111
 $95,829
 $(45,382) $50,558
 $1,971
 $52,529
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

4


STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

  Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2016  2015 
       
Cash flows from operating activities:        
Net income (loss) $(65,000) $3,122,000 
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:        
Net gain on disposal of real estate  (9,000)  (4,783,000)
Loss on extinguishment of debt  1,000   233,000 
Equity in (income) loss of unconsolidated joint ventures  (26,000)  129,000 
Straight-line rent  (26,000)  (30,000)
Amortization of deferred costs and notes payable premium/discount  120,000   127,000 
Depreciation and amortization  870,000   1,868,000 
Amortization of above and below-market leases  (47,000)  (15,000)
Bad debt expense  3,000   11,000 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:        
Prepaid expenses and other assets  189,000   83,000 
Tenant receivables  476,000   (227,000)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses  347,000   (635,000)
Amounts due to affiliates  135,000   62,000 
Other liabilities  (389,000)  216,000 
Net change in restricted cash for operational expenditures  166,000   (849,000)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities  1,745,000   (688,000)
         
Cash flows from investing activities:        
Net proceeds from the sale of real estate  9,000   53,136,000 
Investment in properties under development and costs of development  (27,280,000)  - 
Improvements, capital expenditures, and leasing costs  (42,000)  (480,000)
Investments in unconsolidated joint ventures  -   (4,555,000)
Issuance of note receivable  -   (7,000,000)
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures  283,000   - 
Net change in restricted cash from investments in consolidated variable interest entities  (3,458,000)  - 
Net change in restricted cash for capital expenditures  (40,000)  (147,000)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  (30,528,000)  40,954,000 
         
Cash flows from financing activities:        
Redemption of member interests  -   (2,102,000)
Redemption of common shares  (202,000)  - 
Quartertly distributions  (688,000)  (747,000)
Proceeds from notes and loan  payable  25,200,000   - 
Payment of loan fees and financing costs  (712,000)  - 
Repayment of notes payable  (194,000)  (36,663,000)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities  23,404,000   (39,512,000)
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  (5,379,000)  754,000 
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of period  8,793,000   3,211,000 
Cash and cash equivalents – end of period $3,414,000  $3,965,000 
         
         
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities:        
Distributions declared but not paid $-  $685,000 
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized $490,000  $2,426,000 

(in thousands)
(unaudited)
 Three Months Ended March 31,
 2017 2016
Cash flows from operating activities:   
Net income (loss)$6,179
 $(65)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Net gain on disposal of real estate(6,586) (8)
Equity in income of unconsolidated joint ventures(32) (26)
Straight-line rent(22) (26)
Amortization of deferred costs114
 120
Depreciation and amortization962
 870
Amortization of above and below-market leases(63) (47)
Bad debt expense33
 3
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:   
Prepaid expenses and other assets787
 189
Tenant receivables339
 476
Accounts payable and accrued expenses(692) (257)
Amounts due to affiliates3
 135
Other liabilities124
 (116)
Net change in restricted cash for operational expenditures850
 166
Net cash provided by operating activities1,996
 1,414
    
Cash flows from investing activities:   
Net proceeds from the sale of real estate18,543
 9
Acquisition of real estate(17,783) 
Investment in properties under development and development costs(1,437) (26,949)
Improvements, capital expenditures, and leasing costs(383) (42)
Distributions from unconsolidated joint ventures1,998
 283
Net change in restricted cash from investments in consolidated variable interest entities(291) (3,458)
Net change in restricted cash for capital expenditures302
 (40)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities949
 (30,197)
    
Cash flows from financing activities:   
Redemption of common shares(203) (202)
Quarterly distributions(681) (688)
Proceeds from notes payable27,400
 25,200
Repayment of notes payable(28,050) (194)
Payment of loan fees from investments in consolidated variable interest entities(197) (712)
Payment of loan fees and financing costs(1,314) 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(3,045) 23,404
    
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents(100) (5,379)
Cash and cash equivalents – beginning of period3,130
 8,793
Cash and cash equivalents – end of period$3,030
 $3,414
    
Supplemental disclosure of non-cash investing and financing activities and other cash flow information:   
Distributions declared but not paid$680
 $
Change in accrued liabilities capitalized to investment in development(377) 331
Change to accrued mortgage note payable interest capitalized to investment in development3
 
Amortization of deferred loan fees capitalized to investment in development201
 85
Cash paid for interest, net of amounts capitalized442
 490
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

5


STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(unaudited)
1. ORGANIZATION AND BUSINESS

Strategic Realty Trust, Inc. (the “Company”) was formed on September 18, 2008, as a Maryland corporation. Effective August 22, 2013, the Company changed its name from TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc. to Strategic Realty Trust, Inc. The Company believes it qualifies as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), and has elected REIT status beginning with the taxable year ended December 31, 2009, the year in which the Company began material operations. The Company was initially capitalized by the sale of shares of common stock to Thompson National Properties, LLC (“TNP LLC”) on October 16, 2008.

On November 4, 2008, the Company filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to offer a maximum of 100,000,000 shares of our common stock to the public in our primary offering at $10.00 per share and a maximum of 10,526,316 shares of its common stock to the Company’s stockholders at $9.50 per share pursuant to its distribution reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) (collectively, the “Offering”). On August 7, 2009, the SEC declared the registration statement effective and the Company commenced the Offering. On February 7, 2013, the Company terminated the Offering and ceased offering shares of common stock in the primary offering and under the DRIP. As of the termination of the Offering, the Company had accepted subscriptions for, and issued, 10,688,940 shares of common stock in the Offering for gross offering proceeds of $104,700,000 and 391,182 shares of common stock pursuant to the DRIP for gross offering proceeds of $3,620,000. The Company also granted 50,000 shares of restricted stock and issued 273,729 common shares to pay a portion of a special distribution made to stockholders in 2015 to preserve REIT status based on underreporting of federal taxable income in 2011 (the “Special Distribution”). Cumulatively, through March 31, 2016, the Company has redeemed 396,624 shares of common stock sold in the Offering for $3,197,000.

As a result of the termination of the Offering, offering proceeds are not currently available to fund the Company’s cash needs, and will not be available unless the Company engages in an offering of its securities.

Since the Company’s inception, its business has been managed by an external advisor, and theadvisor. The Company has no direct employees and all management and administrative personnel responsible for conducting the Company’s business are employed by its advisor. Currently, the Company is externally managed and advised by SRT Advisor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”) pursuant to an advisory agreement with the Advisor (the “Advisory Agreement”) initially executed on August 10, 2013, and subsequently renewed in August 2014, August 2015 and August 2015.2016. The current term of the Advisory Agreement terminates on August 10, 2016.2017. The Advisor is an affiliate of Glenborough, LLC (together with its affiliates, “Glenborough”), a privately held full-service real estate investment and management company focused on the acquisition, management and leasing of commercial properties.

Substantially all of the Company’s business is conducted through Strategic Realty Operating Partnership, L.P. (the “OP”). During the Offering,Company’s initial public offering (“Offering”), as the Company accepted subscriptions for shares of its common stock, it transferred substantially all of the net proceeds of the Offering to the OP as a capital contribution. The Company is the sole general partner of the OP. As of both March 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, the Company owned 96.2%96.3% of the limited partnership interestinterests in the OP.

The Company’s principal demand for funds has been for the acquisition of real estate assets, the payment of operating expenses, interest on outstanding indebtedness, the payment of distributions to stockholders, and investments in unconsolidated joint ventures.ventures as well as development of properties. Substantially all of the proceeds of the completed Offering have been used to fund investments in real properties and other real estate-related assets, for payment of operating expenses, for payment of interest, for payment of various fees and expenses, such as acquisition fees and management fees, and for payment of distributions to stockholders. The Company’s available capital resources, cash and cash equivalents on hand and sources of liquidity are currently limited. The Company expects its future cash needs will be funded using cash from operations, future asset sales, debt financing and the proceeds to the Company from any sale of equity that it may conduct in the future.

The Company invests in and manages a portfolio of income-producing retail properties, located in the United States, real estate-owning entities and real estate-related assets, including the investment in or origination of mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans related to commercial real estate. The Company has invested directly, and indirectly through joint ventures, in a portfolio of income-producing retail properties located throughout the United States, with a focus on grocery anchored multi-tenant retail centers, including neighborhood, community and lifestyle shopping centers, multi-tenant shopping centers and free standing single-tenant retail properties. InDuring the first quarter of 2016, the Company invested, through joint ventures, in two significant retail projects under development.

6

On January 7, 2016, the Company invested in a joint venture with Sunset & Gardner Investors, LLC, a subsidiary of Cadence Capital Investments, LLC (the “Gelson’s Joint Venture”). The Gelson’s Joint Venture acquired property located at the corner of Sunset Boulevard and Gardner in Hollywood, California (the “Gelson’s Property”) for a build to suit grocery store for Gelson’s Market. On March 7, 2016, the Company invested in a joint venture with 3032 Wilshire Investors, LLC (the “Wilshire Joint Venture”) to fund the acquisition of certain property located in 3032 Wilshire Boulevard and 1210 Berkeley Street in Santa Monica, California (the “Wilshire Property”). The Wilshire Joint Venture intends to redevelop, reposition and re-lease the Wilshire Property. Together, the Gelson’s Property and Wilshire Property are referred to as “Properties Under Development.”

On September 30, 2015, the Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, formed a joint venture (the “SGO MN Joint Venture”) with MN Retail Grand Avenue Partners, LLC, a subsidiary of Oaktree Real Estate Opportunities Fund V.I. L.P. (“Oaktree”) and GLB SGO MN, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Glenborough Property Partners, LLC (“GPP”). GPP is an affiliate of the Advisor and the Company’s property manager. On March 11, 2015, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, formed a joint venture (the “SGO Joint Venture”) with Grocery Retail Grand Avenue Partners, LLC, a subsidiary of Oaktree, and GLB SGO, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of GPP. These joint ventures own property types similar to properties that are directly owned by the Company.

As of March 31, 2016,2017, in addition to the development projects, the Company’s portfolio of properties was comprised of 913 properties, including 1one property held for sale, with approximately 766,000601,000 rentable square feet of retail space located in 7five states. As of March 31, 2016,2017, the rentable space at the Company’s retail properties including the property held for sale, which was 89% leased.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial statements as contained within the Financial Accounting Standards BoardBoard’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and the rules and regulations of the SEC,Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), including the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X.

The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company, the OP, their direct and indirect owned subsidiaries, and the accounts of joint ventures that are determined to be variable interest entities for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. All significant intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the Company’s condensed consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows have been included.


8

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

The Company evaluates the need to consolidate joint ventures and variable interest entities based on standards set forth in ASC Topic 810,Consolidation(“ (“ASC 810”). In determining whether the Company has a controlling interest in a joint venture or a variable interest entity and the requirement to consolidate the accounts of that entity, management considers factors such as ownership interest, authority to make decisions and contractual and substantive participating rights of the partners/members, as well as whether the entity is a variable interest entity for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company held ownership interests in two unconsolidated joint ventures. Refer to Note 4, “Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures” for additional information. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company held variable interests in the Gelson’s Joint Venture and Wilshire Joint Venture,two variable interest entities and consolidated those entities (seeentities. Refer to Note 5.5, “Variable Interest Entities” for additional information).

Non-Controlling Interests

The Company’s non-controlling interests are comprised primarilyinformation.

Investments in Real Estate
In January 2017, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of common units ina Business (“ASU 2017-01”) that clarifies the OP (“Common Units”) and, until its redemption on March 12, 2015, the membership interest in SRT Secured Holdings, LLC (“Secured Holdings”), one of the Company’s subsidiaries. The Company accountsframework for non-controlling interests in accordance with ASC 810. In accordance with ASC 810, the Company reports non-controlling interests in subsidiaries within equity in the condensed consolidated financial statements, but separate from stockholders’ equity. Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests is presented as a reduction from net income (loss) in calculating net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders on the condensed consolidated statement of operations. Acquisitions or dispositions of non-controlling interests that do not result in a change of control are accounted for as equity transactions. In addition, ASC 810 requires that a parent company recognize a gain or loss in the Company’s results of operations when a subsidiary is deconsolidated upon a change in control. In accordance with ASC 480-10,Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, non-controlling interests that are determined to be redeemable are carried at their fair value or redemption value as of the balance sheet date and reported as liabilities or temporary equity depending on their terms. The Company periodically evaluates individual non-controlling interests for the ability to continue to recognize the non-controlling interest as permanent equity in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Any non-controlling interest that fails to qualify as permanent equity will be reclassified as liabilities or temporary equity. All non-controlling interests at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 qualified as permanent equity.

7

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements requires significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. These judgments affect the reported amountsdetermining whether an integrated set of assets and liabilities and the Company’s disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. With different estimates or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements, and actual results could differ from the estimates or assumptions used by management. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact the comparability of the Company’s condensed consolidated results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. The Company considers significant estimates to include the carrying amounts and recoverability of investments in real estate, impairments, real estate acquisition purchase price allocations, allowance for doubtful accounts, estimated useful lives to determine depreciation and amortization and fair value determinations, among others.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents represent current bank accounts and other bank deposits free of encumbrances and having maturity dates of three months or less from the respective dates of deposit. The Company limits cash investments to financial institutions with high credit standing; therefore, the Company believes it is not exposed to any significant credit risk in cash.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash includes escrow accounts for real property taxes, insurance, capital expenditures and tenant improvements, debt service and leasing costs held by lenders.

Revenue Recognition

Revenues include minimum rents, expense recoveries and percentage rental payments. Minimum rents are recognized on an accrual basis over the terms of the related leases on a straight-line basis when collectability is reasonably assured and the tenant has taken possession or controls the physical use of the leased property. If the lease provides for tenant improvements, the Company determines whether the tenant improvements, for accounting purposes, are owned by the tenant or the Company. When the Company is the owner of the tenant improvements, the tenant is not considered to have taken physical possession or have control of the physical use of the leased asset until the tenant improvements are substantially completed. When the tenant is the owner of the tenant improvements, any tenant improvement allowance that is funded is treated as a lease incentive and amortized as a reduction of revenue over the lease term. Tenant improvement ownership is determined based on various factors including, but not limited to:

whether the lease stipulates how a tenant improvement allowance may be spent;

whether the amount of a tenant improvement allowance is in excess of market rates;

whether the tenant or landlord retains legal title to the improvements at the end of the lease term;

whether the tenant improvements are unique to the tenant or general-purpose in nature; and

8

whether the tenant improvements are expected to have any residual value at the end of the lease.

For leases with minimum scheduled rent increases, the Company recognizes income on a straight-line basis over the lease term when collectability is reasonably assured. Recognizing rental income on a straight-line basis for leases results in recognized revenue amounts which differ from those that are contractually due from tenants on a cash basis. If the Company determines the collectability of straight-line rents is not reasonably assured, the Company limits future recognition to amounts contractually owed and paid, and, when appropriate, establishes an allowance for estimated losses.

The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts, including an allowance for straight-line rent receivables, for estimated losses resulting from tenant defaults or the inability of tenants to make contractual rent and tenant recovery payments. The Company monitors the liquidity and creditworthiness of its tenants on an ongoing basis. For straight-line rent amounts, the Company’s assessment is based on amounts estimated to be recoverable over the term of the lease. The Company’s straight-line rent receivable (not including receivables on property held for sale), which is included in tenant receivables, net, on the condensed consolidated balance sheets, was $618,000 and $592,000 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

Certain leases contain provisions that require the payment of additional rents based on the respective tenants’ sales volume (contingent or percentage rent) and substantially all contain provisions that require reimbursement of the tenants’ allocable real estate taxes, insurance and common area maintenance costs (“CAM”). Revenue based on percentage of tenants’ sales is recognized only after the tenant exceeds its sales breakpoint. Revenue from tenant reimbursements of taxes, insurance and CAM is recognized in the period that the applicable costs are incurred in accordance with the lease agreement.

The Company recognizes gains or losses on sales of real estate in accordance with ASC 360,Property, Plant, and Equipment (“ASC 360”). Gains are not recognized and are deferred until (a) a sale has been consummated; (b) the buyer’s initial and continuing investments are adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the property; (c) the Company’s receivable, if any, is not subject to future subordination; and (d) the Company has transferred to the buyer the usual risks and reward of ownership, and the Company does not have a substantial continuing involvement with the property. As of March 31, 2016, deferred gain on the sale of properties to the SGO Joint Venture was $1.2 million.

Valuation of Accounts Receivables

The Company makes estimates of the collectability of its tenant receivables related to base rents, including deferred rents receivable, expense reimbursements and other revenue or income.

The Company analyzes tenant receivables, deferred rent receivable, historical bad debts, customer creditworthiness, current economic trends and changes in customer payment terms when evaluating the adequacy of the allowance for doubtful accounts. In addition, with respect to tenants in bankruptcy, the Company will make estimates of the expected recovery of pre-petition and post-petition claims in assessing the estimated collectability of the related receivable. In some cases, the ultimate resolution of these claims can exceed one year. When a tenant is in bankruptcy, the Company will record a bad debt reserve for the tenant’s receivable balance and generally will not recognize subsequent rental revenue until cash is received or until the tenant is no longer in bankruptcy and has the ability to make rental payments.

Concentration of Credit Risk

A concentration of credit risk arises in the Company’s business when a nationally or regionally-based tenant occupies a substantial amount of space in multiple properties owned by the Company. In that event, if the tenant suffers a significant downturn in its business, it may become unable to make its contractual rent payments to the Company, exposing the Company to potential losses in rental revenue, expense recoveries, and percentage rent. Generally, the Company does not obtain security deposits from the nationally-based or regionally-based tenants in support of their lease obligations to the Company. The Company regularly monitors its tenant base to assess potential concentrations of credit risk. As of March 31, 2016, excluding property classified as held for sale, Ralph’s Grocery accounted for 10% of the Company’s annual minimum rent. As of March 31, 2016, there was no outstanding receivable from Ralph’s Grocery.

9

Business Combinations

The Company records the acquisition of income-producing real estate or real estate that will be used for the production of income as a business combination when the acquired propertyactivities meets the definition of a business. AssetsThe revised framework establishes a screen for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities is a business and narrows the definition of a business, which is expected to result in fewer transactions being accounted for as business combinations. Acquisitions of integrated sets of assets and activities that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. 

The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01 for the reporting period beginning January 1, 2017. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-01, the Company’s acquisitions of properties beginning January 1, 2017, were evaluated under the new guidance. The acquisitions occurring during 2017 were determined to be asset acquisitions, as they did not meet the revised definition of a business.
Evaluation of business combination or asset acquisition:
The Company evaluates each acquisition of real estate to determine if the integrated set of assets and activities acquired meet the definition of a business and need to be accounted for as a business combination. If either of the following criteria is met, the integrated set of assets and activities acquired would not qualify as a business:
•    Substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in either a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; or
•    The integrated set of assets and activities is lacking, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs (i.e. revenue generated before and after the transaction).
An acquired process is considered substantive if:
•    The process includes an organized workforce (or includes an acquired contract that provides access to an organized workforce), that is skilled, knowledgeable, and experienced in performing the process;
•    The process cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort, or delay; or
•    The process is considered unique or scarce.
Generally, the Company expects that acquisitions of real estate will not meet the revised definition of a business because substantially all of the fair value is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets (i.e. land, buildings, and related intangible assets), or because the acquisition does not include a substantive process in the form of an acquired workforce or an acquired contract that cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort or delay.
In asset acquisitions, the purchase consideration, including acquisition costs, is allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination are generally measured at their acquisition-date fair values, including tenant improvements and identifiable intangible assets or liabilities. Tenant improvements recognized represent the tangible assets associated with the existing leases valued on a relative fair value basis at the acquisition date. Tenant improvements are classified as assets under investments in real estate and are depreciated over the remaining lease terms. Identifiable intangible assets and liabilities relate to the value of in-place operating leases which come in three forms: (1) leasing commissions and legal costs, which represent the value associated with “cost avoidance” of acquiring in-place leases, such as lease commissions paid under terms generally experienced in markets in which the Company operates; (2) value of in-place leases, which represents the estimated loss of revenue and of costs incurred for the period required to lease the “assumed vacant” property to the occupancy level when purchased; and (3) above- or below-market value of in-place leases, which represents the difference between the contractual rents and market rents at the time of the acquisition, discounted for tenant credit risks. The value of in-place leases is recorded in acquired lease intangibles and amortized over the remaining lease term. Above- or below-market-rate leases are classified in acquired lease intangibles, or in acquired below-market lease intangibles, depending on whether the contractual terms are above- or below-market. Above-market leases are amortized asbasis. As a decrease to rental revenue over the remaining non-cancelable terms of the respective leases and below-market leases are amortized as an increase to rental revenue over the remaining initial lease term and any fixed rate renewal periods, if applicable.

Acquisition costs are expensed as incurred. Costs incurred in pursuit of targeted properties forresult, asset acquisitions do not yet closed or those determined to no longer be viable and costs incurred which are expected to result in future period disposalsthe recognition of property not currently classified as held for sale properties have been expensed and are also classified in the condensed consolidated statements of operations as transaction expenses.

Estimates of the fair values of the tangible assets, identifiable intangibles and assumed liabilities require the Company to make significant assumptions to estimate market lease rates, property operating expenses, carrying costs during lease-up periods, discount rates, market absorption periods, and the number of years the property will be held for investment. The use of inappropriate assumptions would result in an incorrect valuation of the Company’s acquired tangible assets, identifiable intangibles and assumed liabilities, which would impact the amount of the Company’s results of operations. These allocations also impact depreciation expense, amortization expense and gainsgoodwill or losses recorded on future sales of properties.

Reportable Segments

ASC 280,Segment Reporting, establishes standards for reporting financial and descriptive information about an enterprise’s reportable segments. The Company has one reportable segment, income-producing retail properties, which consists of activities related to investing in real estate. The retail properties are geographically diversified throughout the United States, and the Company evaluates operating performance on an overall portfolio level.

Investments in Real Estate

Real property is recorded at estimated fair value at time of acquisition with subsequent additions at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Costs include those related to acquisition, development and construction, including tenant improvements, interest incurred during development, costs of pre-development and certain direct and indirect costs of development.

a bargain purchase gain.

Depreciation and amortization is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:

 Years
Buildings and improvements5 - 30 years
Tenant improvements1 - 36 years

Tenant improvement costs recorded as capital assets are depreciated over the tenant’s remaining lease term, which the Company has determined approximates the useful life of the improvement.

10

Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred. Significant renovations and improvements that improve or extend the useful lives of


9

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

assets are capitalized.

Properties Under Development

The initial cost of properties under development includes the acquisition cost of the property, direct development Acquisition costs and borrowing costs directly attributablerelated to the development. Borrowing costs associated with direct expenditures on properties under development are capitalized. The amount of capitalized borrowing costs is determined by reference to borrowings specific to the project, where relevant. Borrowing costsasset acquisitions are capitalized from the commencement of the development until the date of practical completion where the property is substantially ready for its intended use. Capitalization of borrowing costs is suspended if there are prolonged periods when development activity is interrupted. Practical completion is when the property is capable of operating in the manner intended by management.

Interest on projects during periods of development is capitalized until the project is ready for its intended use based on interest rates in place during the development period. The amount of interest capitalized during the three months ended March 31, 2016, was $328,000.

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate that the carrying amounts of its investments in real estate and related intangible assets may not be recoverable. When indicators of potential impairment suggest that the carrying valuecondensed consolidated balance sheets.

For acquisitions of real estate prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01, which were generally accounted for as business combinations, the Company recognized the assets acquired (including the intangible value of acquired above- or below-market leases, acquired in-place leases and relatedother intangible assets may not be recoverable, the Company assesses the recoverability by estimating whether the Company will recover the carrying value of the real estate and related intangible assets through its undiscounted future cash flows (excluding interest) and its eventual disposition. If, based on this analysis, the Company does not believe that it will be able to recover the carrying value of the real estate and related intangible assets and liabilities, the Company would record an impairment loss to the extent that the carrying value exceeds the estimated fair value of the investments in real estate and related intangible assets. Key inputs that the Company estimates in this analysis include projected rental rates, capital expenditures, property sale capitalization rates, and expected holding period of the property.

The Company evaluates its equity investments for impairment in accordance with ASC 320,Investments – Debt and Securities (“ASC 320”). ASC 320 provides guidance for determining when an investment is considered impaired, whether impairment is other-than-temporary, and measurement of an impairment loss.

The Company continually monitors its properties under development for impairment. Estimates of future cash flows used to test the recoverability of properties under development are based on their expected service potential when development is substantially complete. Those estimates include cash flows associated with all future expenditures necessary to develop the properties under development, including interest payments that will be capitalized as part of the cost of the properties under development.

The Company did not record any impairment losses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations

When certain criteria are met, long-lived assets are classified as held for sale and are reported at the lower of their carrying value or their fair value, less costs to sell, and are no longer depreciated. For property sales prior to May 1, 2014, discontinued operations is a component of an entity that has either been disposed of or is deemed to be held for sale and (i) the operations and cash flows of the component have been eliminated from ongoing operations as a result of the disposal transaction and (ii) the entity does not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction. For property sales on or after May 1, 2014, a disposal of a component of an entity is required to be reported as discontinued operations only if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on an entity’s operations and financial results. See Note 3. “Real Estate Investments” for a discussion of property sales and discontinued operations.

Fair Value Measurements

Under GAAP, the Company is required to measure or disclose certain financial instrumentsliabilities) at fair value as of the acquisition date. Acquisition costs related to the business combinations were expensed as incurred.

Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform with current period’s presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on the Company’s consolidated financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB issued the following ASUs which could have potential impact to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements:
In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Restricted Cash, which amends (Topic 230), Statement of Cash Flows (“ASU 2016-18”). ASU 2016-18 requires that a recurring basis. In addition,statement of cash flows explain the Companychange during the reporting period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, andrestricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. ASU 2016-18 is required to measure other financial instruments and balances at fair value on a non-recurring basis (e.g., carrying value of impaired real estate loans receivable and long-lived assets). Fair valueeffective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is defined as the price that would be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liabilitypermitted, including adoption in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.interim period. ASU 2016-18 will require adoption using a retrospective transition method. The GAAP fair value framework uses a three-tiered approach. Fair value measurements are classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:

11

Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that areadoption will not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and

Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available for inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement.

When available, the Company utilizes quoted market prices or other observable inputs (Level 2 inputs), such as interest rates or yield curves, from independent third-party sources to determine fair value and classify such items in Level 1 or Level 2. In instances where the market for a financial instrument is not active, regardless of the availability of a nonbinding quoted market price, observable inputs might not be relevant and could require the Company to use significant judgment to derive a fair value measurement. Additionally, in an inactive market, a market price quoted from an independent third-party may rely more on models with inputs based on information available only to that independent third party. When the Company determines the market for an asset owned by it to be illiquid or when market transactions for similar instruments do not appear orderly, the Company uses several valuation sources (including internal valuations, discounted cash flow analysis and external appraisals) and establishes a fair value by assigning weights to the various valuation sources. Additionally, when determining the fair value of liabilities in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for an identical liability is not available, the Company measures fair value using (i) a valuation technique that uses the quoted price of the identical liability when traded as an asset or quoted prices for similar liabilities when traded as assets; or (ii) a present value technique that considers the future cash flows based on contractual obligations discounted by observed or estimated market rates of comparable liabilities. The use of contractual cash flows with regard to amount and timing significantly reduces the judgment applied in arriving at fair value.

Changes in assumptions or estimation methodologies can have a material effect on these estimated fair values. In this regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, may not be realized in an immediate settlement of the instrument.

The Company considers the following factors to be indicators of an inactive market: (1) there are few recent transactions; (2) price quotations are not based on current information; (3) price quotations vary substantially either over time or among market makers (for example, some brokered markets); (4) indexes that previously were highly correlated with the fair values of the asset or liability are demonstrably uncorrelated with recent indications of fair value for that asset or liability; (5) there is a significant increase in implied liquidity risk premiums, yields, or performance indicators (such as delinquency rates or loss severities) for observed transactions or quoted prices when compared with the Company’s estimate of expected cash flows, considering all available market data about credit and other nonperformance risk for the asset or liability; (6) there is a wide bid-ask spread or significant increase in the bid-ask spread; (7) there is a significant decline or absence of a market for new issuances (that is, a primary market) for the asset or liability or similar assets or liabilities; and (8) little information is released publicly (for example, a principal-to-principal market).

The Company considers the following factors to be indicators of non-orderly transactions: (1) there was not adequate exposure to the market for a period before the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets or liabilities under current market conditions; (2) there was a usual and customary marketing period, but the seller marketed the asset or liability to a single market participant; (3) the seller is in or near bankruptcy or receivership (that is, distressed), or the seller was required to sell to meet regulatory or legal requirements (that is, forced); and (4) the transaction price is an outlier when compared with other recent transactions for the same or similar assets or liabilities.

12

Deferred Financing Costs

Deferred financing costs represent commitment fees, loan fees, legal fees and other third-party costs associated with obtaining financing. These costs are amortized over the terms of the respective financing agreements using the straight-line method which approximates the effective interest method. Unamortized deferred financing costs are expensed when the associated debt is refinanced or repaid before maturity. Costs incurred in seeking financings that do not close are expensed in the period in which it is determined that the financing will not close.

The Company presents deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization, as a contra-liability that reduces the carrying amount of the associated note payable, rather than as a deferred asset. Deferred financing costs related to a line-of-credit arrangement are presented on the balance sheet as a deferred asset, regardless of whether there were any outstanding borrowings at period-end.

Accounting for Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The Company accounts for its current investments in unconsolidated joint ventures under the equity method of accounting. Under the equity method of accounting, the Company records its initial investment in a joint venture at cost and subsequently adjusts the cost for the Company’s share of the joint venture’s income or loss and cash contributions and distributions each period. See Note 4. “Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures” for a discussion of the Company’s investments in joint ventures.

The Company monitors its investments in unconsolidated joint ventures periodically for impairment. No impairment indicators were identified and no impairment losses were recorded during the three months ended March, 31, 2016.

Income Taxes

The Company has elected to be taxed as a REIT under the Internal Revenue Code. To qualify as a REIT, the Company must meet certain organizational and operational requirements, including a requirement to distribute at least 90% of the Company’s annual REIT taxable income to stockholders (which is computed without regard to the dividends paid deduction or net capital gain and which does not necessarily equal net income as calculated in accordance with GAAP). As a REIT, the Company generally will not be subject to federal income tax on income that it distributes as dividends to its stockholders. If the Company fails to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, it will be subject to federal income tax on its taxable income at regular corporate income tax rates and generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which qualification is lost, unless the Internal Revenue Service grants the Company relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially and adversely affect the Company’s net income and net cash available for distribution to stockholders. However, the Company believes that it is organized and operates in such a manner as to qualify for treatment as a REIT. Even if the Company qualifies as a REIT, it may be subject to certain state or local income taxes, and to U.S. federal income and excise taxes on its undistributed income.

The Company evaluates tax positions taken in the condensed consolidated financial statements under the interpretation for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes. As a result of this evaluation, the Company may recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is “more-likely-than-not” that the tax position will be sustained on examination by taxing authorities.

When necessary, deferred income taxes are recognized in certain taxable entities. Deferred income tax is generally a function of the period’s temporary differences (items that are treated differently for tax purposes than for financial reporting purposes). A valuation allowance for deferred income tax assets is provided if all or some portion of the deferred income tax asset may not be realized. Any increase or decrease in the valuation allowance is generally included in deferred income tax expense.

The Company’s tax returns remain subject to examination and consequently, the taxability of the distributions is subject to change.

statements.

In 2015, the Company estimated it could owe alternative minimum state/federal taxes totaling approximately $200,000 and this amount was accrued and included in expense as of December 31, 2015. During the three months ended March 31,October 2016, the Company finalized its calculation of taxes owed for 2015, which was less than the recorded accrual, resulting in a reversal of $111,000 and payment of $89,000. The amount of over accrual was immaterial.

13

Earnings Per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed after adjusting the basic EPS computation for the effect of potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. The effect of non-vested shares, if dilutive, is computed using the treasury stock method. The Company accounts for non-vested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether paid or unpaid) as participating securities, which are included in the computation of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The Company’s excess of distributions over earnings related to participating securities are shown as a reduction in income (loss) attributable to common stockholders in the Company’s computation of EPS.

Reclassifications

Assets sold or held for sale and related liabilities have been reclassified on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. For operating properties sold prior to May 1, 2014, the related operating results have been reclassified from continuing to discontinued operations on the condensed consolidated statements of operations. For operating properties sold on or after May 1, 2014, the related operating results remain in continuing operations on the condensed consolidated statements of operations unless the sold properties represent a strategic shift that have had (or will have) a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results.

As of March 31, 2016, in respect to the Company’s adoption of ASU No. 2015-03,Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU No. 2015-03”), the Company reclassified $938,000 of deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization, as a contra-liability to notes payable on the condensed consolidated balance sheet, and $127,000 of deferred financing costs related to property held for sale, net of accumulated amortization, as a contra-liability to liabilities held for sale on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. ASU 2015-03 requires retrospective application, wherein the balance sheet of each period presented should be adjusted to reflect the effects of the new guidance. Accordingly, for comparative purposes herein, the Company reclassified the December 31, 2015 balance of $339,000 of deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization, as a contra-liability to notes payable in the condensed consolidated balance sheet, and $127,000 of deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization, as a contra-liability to liabilities held for sale on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Newly Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

The Company adopted ASU No. 2015-03 on a retrospective basis, effective for the quarter ended March 31, 2016. The amendments in ASU No. 2015-03 require debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount. ASU No. 2015-03 is limited to the presentation of debt issuance costs and does not affect the recognition and measurement of debt issuance costs. The adoption of ASU No. 2015-03 would change the presentation of debt issuance costs as the Company presents debt issuance costs as deferred financing costs, net on the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. ASU No. 2015-03 does not address how debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements should be presented on the balance sheet or amortized. Given this absence of authoritative guidance within ASU 2015-03, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15,Interest – Imputation2016-17, Consolidation (Topic 810), Interests Held through related Parties That Are under Common Control (“ASU 2016-17”). ASU 2016-17 changes how a reporting entity that is a single decision maker of Interest (Subtopic 835-30), Presentation and Subsequent Measurementa variable interest entity should treat indirect interest in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of Debt Issuance Costs Associatedthat variable interest entity. ASU 2016-17 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. ASU 2016-17 will require adoption using the retrospective transition method beginning with Line-of-Credit Arrangements, Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting,the fiscal year in which clarifies that the SEC Staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. Effectiveamendments in ASU No. 2015-02 were initially applied. The Company adopted ASU 2016-17 beginning January 2016, the Company presents deferred financing costs, net, as a contra-liability in periods when there is an associated debt liability on the balance sheet, rather than as a deferred asset. If no associated debt liability is recorded on the balance sheet, deferred financing costs will be presented as a deferred asset.1, 2017. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The Company adopted ASU No. 2015-16, (Business Combinations (Topic 805),Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustment(“ASU 2015-16”), effective for the quarter ended March 31, 2016. The amendments in ASU 2015-16 require an acquirer to recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amounts are determined. Further, the acquirer is required to record, in the financial statements for the same period, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. Entities must also present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes the portion of the amount recorded in current period earnings by the line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. The guidance should be applied prospectively and early adoption is permitted.The adoption of ASU 2015-162016-17 had no impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

14

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU No. 2014-09,Revenue from Contracts with Customers(“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenues arising from contracts with customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which effectively defers the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Companies may apply either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt this guidance.In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08,Revenue from Contracts with Customers2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), which amended the principal versus agent guidance in the new revenue standard230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and is intended to result in more consistent application and reduce the cost and complexity of applying the new standard. Additionally, in April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10,Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and LicensingCash Payments (“ASU 2016-10”), which amended the guidance to clarify accounting for licenses of intellectual property and to clarify the guidance on performance obligations.The Company is currently evaluating the transition methods and the impact of the guidance on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15,Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concern(“ASU 2014-15”2016-15”). ASU 2014-15 provides guidance regarding management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The new guidance requires that management evaluate for each annual and interim reporting period whether conditions exist that give rise to substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the financial statement issuance date, and if so, provide related disclosures. Disclosures are only required if conditions give rise to substantial doubt, whether or not the substantial doubt is alleviated by management’s plans. No disclosures are required2016-15 addresses eight specific to going concern uncertainties if an assessment of the conditions does not give rise to substantial doubt. Substantial doubt exists when conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that a company will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the financial statement issuance date. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this guidance will have a material impact on the Company's condensed consolidated financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01,Financial Instruments-Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities(“ASU 2016-01”). ASU 2016-01 requires equity investments to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordancecash flow issues with the fair value option for financial instruments; requires separate presentationobjective of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial assets on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements and clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securitiesreducing diversity in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets.practice. ASU 2016-012016-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim periods within thoseperiod. ASU 2016-15 will require adoption on a retrospective basis. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the application of ASU 2016-15 will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (“ASU 2016-13”). ASU 2016-13 requires a financial asset, measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. ASU 2016-13 is effective for fiscal years.years beginning after December 15, 2019, with adoption permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. Adjustments resulting from adopting ASU 2016-13 shall be applied through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the guidance on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02,Leases (Topic 842) (“(“ASU 2016-02”).ASU 2016-02 requires entities to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The guidance retains a distinction between finance leases and operating leases. The recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease by a lessee have not significantly changed from previous guidance. However, the principal difference from previous guidance is that the lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases should be recognized in the statement of financial position. The accounting applied by a lessor is largely unchanged from that applied under the previous guidance. The amendments in this guidance are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is permitted. Lessees and lessors are required to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach includes a number of optional practical expedients that entities may elect to apply. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the guidance on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In MarchMay 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenues arising from contracts with

10

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

customers. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers(Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which effectively defers the adoption of ASU 2014-09 to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Companies may apply either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adopt this guidance. In 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-07,Investments – Equity Method2016-08, ASU No. 2016-09 and Joint Ventures (Topic 323): SimplifyingASU No. 2016-12, which provide interpretive clarifications on the Transition tonew guidance in Topic 606. As the Equity MethodCompany’s revenues are primarily generated through leasing arrangements, which are scoped out of Accounting (“ASU 2016-07”). The purpose ofthis standard, the amendment is to eliminate the requirement that when an investment uses the equity method as a result of an increase in the level of ownership interest or degree of influence, an investor must adjust the investment, results of operations, and retained earnings retroactively on a step-by step basis as if the equity method had been in effect during all previous periods that the investment had been held. For public entities, the amendments in ASU 2016-07 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company does not anticipate thatexpect the adoption of this guidance willASU 2014-09 to have ana significant impact on the Company's condensed consolidatedits financial statements.

15

3. REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS

Acquisition of Properties

On January 4, 2017, the Company purchased certain property located in the Hayes Valley neighborhood at 388 Fulton Street in San Francisco, California (“388 Fulton”). The seller was not affiliated with the Company or the Advisor. 388 Fulton is comprised of two leased commercial condominiums with an aggregate of 3,110 square feet of retail space. The aggregate purchase price of 388 Fulton was approximately $4.2 million, subject to customary closing costs and proration adjustments. The Company diddrew down $4.0 million on its credit facility with KeyBank to fund this acquisition.
On January 11, 2017, the Company purchased certain property located in the Silver Lake neighborhood of Los Angeles, California (“Silver Lake”). The seller was not have any propertyaffiliated with the Company or the Advisor. Silver Lake is comprised of two boutique retail buildings totaling approximately 10,497 square feet of retail space. The aggregate purchase price of Silver Lake was approximately $13.3 million subject to customary closing costs and proration adjustments. The Company drew down $11.0 million on its credit facility with KeyBank to fund this acquisition.
The Company evaluated the above transactions under the new framework pursuant to ASU 2017-01, which the Company early-adopted effective January 1, 2017. Acquisitions that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. Refer to Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” for further details. Accordingly, the Company accounted for the purchases of Silver Lake and 388 Fulton as asset acquisitions forand allocated the total cash consideration to the individual assets and liabilities acquired on a relative fair value basis.
For the three months ended March 31, 20162017, the Company incurred $0.3 million of acquisition-related costs. These costs were capitalized and 2015. For property acquisitions of the Company’s consolidated variable interests, referallocated to Note. 5 “Variable Interest Entities.”

2016land and buildings acquired on a relative fair value basis.

2017 Sale of Properties

The Company did not sell any properties for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

2015 Sale of Properties

On March 11, 2015,January 6, 2017, the Company soldconsummated the following three propertiesdisposition of Pinehurst Square East, located in Bismarck, North Dakota, for the aggregate grossa sales price of $53.6 million:

Property Location Acquisition Date Gross
Sales Price
  Original
Purchase Price(1)
 
Osceola Village Kissimmee, Florida 10/11/2011 $22,000,000  $21,800,000(2)
Constitution Trail Normal, Illinois 10/21/2011  23,100,000   18,000,000 
Aurora Commons Aurora, Ohio 3/20/2012  8,500,000   7,000,000 
    Total     $53,600,000  $46,800,000 

(1)The original purchase price amounts do not include acquisition fees.
(2)The original purchase price for Osceola Village included an additional pad which was sold for $875,000 prior to this transaction.

approximately $19.2 million in cash. The Company used the net proceeds from the sale of Pinehurst Square East to repay $18.4 million of the outstanding balance on its credit facility with KeyBank. The sale of the three propertiesproperty did not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results and its results of operations were not reported as discontinued operations on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The disposition of Pinehurst Square East resulted in a result,gain of $6.1 million, which was not included in discontinuedon the Company’s condensed consolidated statement of operations. The Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations include net operating income of approximately $8 thousand and $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, related to Pinehurst Square East.


11

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

Pro Forma Financial Information
The pro forma financial information below is based upon the Company’s historical condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015.2017 and 2016, adjusted to give effect to the above sale transaction as if it had been completed at the beginning of 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company’s condensed consolidated statementpro forma financial information is presented for information purposes only, and may not be indicative of what actual results of operations includes net operating losseswould have been had the transaction occurred at the beginning of $289,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2015, relating2017 and 2016, respectively, nor does it purport to therepresent results of operations for the three sold properties.

The sale of Osceola Village, Constitution Trail and Aurora Commons (the “SGO Properties”) was completedfuture periods (amounts in connection with the formation of the SGO Joint Venture. The three properties were sold to the SGO Joint Venture, and the closing of the sale was conditioned on the Company receiving a 19% membership interest in the SGO Joint Venture. In exchange for this 19% membership interest, the Company contributed $4.5 million to the SGO Joint Venture, which amount was credited against the Company’s proceeds from the sale of the three properties to the SGO Joint Venture. Of the net sales proceeds from the sale of the aforementioned properties, $36.4 million was used by the Company to retire the debt associated with the sold properties

thousands):

 (Pro Forma)
 Three Months Ended March 31,
 2017 2016
Rental and reimbursement revenues$2,591
 $2,216
Net income6,170
 5,750
Net income attributable to common stockholders5,940
 5,533
    
Net income attributable to common shares - basic and diluted$0.54
 $0.50
Assets Held for Sale and Liabilities Related to Assets Held for Sale

AtMarch 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, Bloomingdale Hills,2017, Woodland West Marketplace, located in Riverside, Florida,Arlington, Texas, was classified as held for sale in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Since the sale of thethis property does not represent a strategic shift that will have a major effect on the Company’s operations and financial results, itsthe results of operations wasof this property were not reported as discontinued operations on the Company’s financial statements. See Note. 14 “Subsequent Events”On April 17, 2017, the Company consummated the disposition of Woodland West Marketplace for a sales price of approximately $14.6 million and used the net proceeds from the sale to repay a portion of Bloomingdale Hills after quarter-end.the outstanding balance on its credit facility with KeyBank. The Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations include net operating income of $83,000approximately $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2017, and net operating loss of $15,000$32 thousand for the three months ended March 31, 2016, and 2015, respectively, related to the assets held for sale.

16


12

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

The major classes of assets and liabilities related to assets held for sale included in the condensed consolidated balance sheets at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 wereare as follows:

  March 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
ASSETS        
Investments in real estate        
Land $4,718,000  $4,718,000 
Building and improvements  4,697,000   4,697,000 
Tenant improvements  499,000   499,000 
   9,914,000   9,914,000 
Accumulated depreciation  (891,000)  (891,000)
Investments in real estate, net  9,023,000   9,023,000 
Lease intangibles, net  694,000   694,000 
Tenant receivables, net  35,000   36,000 
Prepaid expenses  -   16,000 
Assets held for sale $9,752,000  $9,769,000 
LIABILITIES        
Notes payable, net(1)  5,218,000   5,268,000 
Below market lease intangibles, net  1,625,000   1,625,000 
Other liabilities  16,000   16,000 
Liabilities related to assets held for sale $6,859,000  $6,909,000 

(1)Includes $127,000 reclassification of deferred financing costs, net of accumulated amortization, as a contra-liability to notes payable, as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

follows (amounts in thousands):

 March 31, December 31,
 2017 2016
ASSETS   
Investments in real estate   
Land$2,449
 $5,718
Building and improvements10,132
 20,261
Tenant improvements668
 1,283
 13,249
 27,262
Accumulated depreciation(2,274) (4,257)
Investments in real estate, net10,975
 23,005
Tenant receivables, net89
 135
Lease intangibles, net633
 1,017
Assets held for sale$11,697
 $24,157
LIABILITIES   
Notes payable$13,731
 $21,783
Below-market lease intangibles, net385
 399
Liabilities related to assets held for sale$14,116
 $22,182
Amounts above wereare being presented at their carrying valuesvalue, which the Company believedbelieves to be lower than their estimated fair value less costs to sell.

4. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED JOINT VENTURES

The following table summarizes the Company’s investments in unconsolidated joint ventures as of March 31, 20162017, and December 31, 2015:

    Ownership Interest  Investment at 
Joint Venture Date of
Investment
 March 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
  March 31,
2016
  December 31,
2015
 
SGO Retail Acquisitions Venture, LLC 3/11/2015  19%  19% $3,967,000  $4,098,000 
SGO MN Retail Acquisitions Venture, LLC 9/30/2015  10%  10%  2,678,000   2,804,000 
Total           $6,645,000  $6,902,000 

2016 (amounts in thousands):

    Ownership Interest Investment
Joint Venture Date of Investment March 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 March 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
SGO Retail Acquisitions Venture, LLC 3/11/2015 19% 19% $1,081
 $3,052
SGO MN Retail Acquisitions Venture, LLC 9/30/2015 10% 10% 1,714
 1,709
Total       $2,795
 $4,761
The Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of investments in the joint ventures as set forth in the table above. The joint ventures typically fund their cash needs through secured debt financings obtained by and in the name of the joint venture entity. The joint ventures’ debts are secured by a first mortgage, are without recourse to the joint venture members, and do not represent a liability of the members other than carve-out guarantees for certain matters such as environmental conditions, misuse of funds and material misrepresentations. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the Company has provided carve-out guarantees in connection with the two aforementioned unconsolidated joint ventures; in connection with those carve-out guarantees, the Company has certain rights of recovery from the joint venture members.

17

5. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

The Company has variable interests in, and is the primary beneficiary of, variable interest entities (“VIEs”) through its investments in (i) the Gelson’s Joint Venture and (ii) the 3032 Wilshire Joint Venture.Venture (both as defined below). The Company has consolidated the accounts of these variable interest entities. For further information, refer to Note 2. “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” under “Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation.”

Gelson’s Joint Venture

On January 7, 2016, the Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement of Sunset & Gardner Investors, LLC (the “Gelson’s Joint Venture Agreement”) to form thea joint venture (the” Gelson’s Joint VentureVenture”) with Sunset & Gardner LA, LLC (“S&G LA” and, together with the Company, the “Gelson’s Members”), a subsidiary of Cadence Capital Investments, LLC (“Cadence”). Cadence is a real estate development and investment firm focused on commercial properties. They offer high-quality, market-driven developments, and have expertise in market planning and site selection build to suit and small center developments, redevelopment and repositioning

13

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

The Gelson’s Joint Venture Agreement provides for the ownership and operation of certain real property by the Gelson’s Joint Venture, in which the Company owns a 100% capital interest and a 50% profits interest. In exchange for ownership in the Gelson’s Joint Venture, the Company has agreed to contributecontributed cash in an amount up to $7$7.0 million in initial capital contributions and $700,000has agreed to contribute $0.7 million in subsequent capital contributions to the Gelson’s Joint Venture. In May 2016, the Company made an additional capital contribution of $0.2 million to the Gelson’s Joint Venture. In January 2017, the Company made another capital contribution of $0.8 million to the Gelson’s Joint Venture. S&G LA contributed its rights to acquire the real property, its interest under a 20 year lease with Gelson’s Markets (the “Gelson’s Lease”) and agreed to provide certain management and development services.

On January 28, 2016, the Gelson’s Joint Venture used the capital contributions of the Company, together with the proceeds of a loan from Buchanan Mortgage Holdings, LLC in the amount of $10,700,000,$10.7 million, to purchase property located at the corner of Sunset Boulevard and Gardner in Hollywood, California for a build-to-suit grocery store for Gelson’s PropertyMarkets (the “Gelson’s Property”) from a third party seller, for a total purchase price of $12,950,000.approximately $13.0 million. The Gelson’s Joint Venture intends to proceed with obtaining all required governmental approvals and entitlements to replace the existing improvements on the property with a build to suitbuild-to-suit grocery store for Gelson’s Markets with an expected size of approximately 38,000 square feet. Gelson’s Markets was founded in 1951 and is recognized as one of the nation’s premier supermarket chains. Gelson’s Markets currently has 1824 locations throughout Southern California.

Pursuant to the Gelson’s Joint Venture Agreement, S&G LA will managemanages and conductconducts the day-to-day operations and affairs of the Gelson’s Joint Venture, subject to certain major decisions set forth in the Gelson’s Joint Venture Agreement that require the consent of all the Gelson’s Members. Income, losses and distributions willare generally be allocated based on the Gelson’s Members’ respective capital and profits interests. Additionally, in certain circumstances described in the Gelson’s Joint Venture Agreement, the Company may be required to make additional capital contributions to the Joint Venture, in proportion to the Gelson’s Members’ respective ownership interests. Until the Company has received back its capital contribution and specified preferred returns, all distributions go to the Company; thereafter, the Gelson’s Joint Venture will distribute the profits 50% to the Company and 50% to S&G LA.

3032 Wilshire Joint Venture

On December 21, 2015, the Company, through wholly ownedwholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement of 3032 Wilshire Investors, LLC (the “Wilshire Joint Venture Agreement”) to form the Wilshirea joint venture (the “Wilshire Joint VentureVenture”) with 3032 Wilshire SM, LLC, a subsidiary of Cadence (together with the Company, the “Wilshire Members”).

On December 14, 2015 and January 5, 2016, the Company paid deposits in the amounts of $500,000$0.5 million and $100,000,$0.1 million, respectively, toward the acquisition of certain property located at 3032 Wilshire Boulevard and 1210 Berkeley Street in Santa Monica, California (the “Wilshire Property”). The Wilshire Joint Venture is in the process of redeveloping and repositioning, and intends to re-lease the Wilshire Property. On March 7, 2016, the Company contributed $5,700,000$5.7 million to the Wilshire Joint Venture. In May 2016, the Company made an additional capital contribution of $0.3 million to the Wilshire Joint Venture. In January 2017 and February 2017, the Company made two additional contributions of $0.3 million and $0.6 million, respectively, to the Wilshire Joint Venture. The Wilshire Joint Venture Agreement provides for the ownership and operation of certain real property by the Wilshire Joint Venture, in which the Company owns a 100% capital interest and a 50% profits interest.

On March 8, 2016, the Wilshire Joint Venture used the deposits and capital contribution of the Company, together with the proceeds of a loan from Buchanan Mortgage Holdings, LLC in the amount of $8,500,000,$8.5 million, to acquire the Wilshire Property from a third partythird-party seller, for a total purchase price of $13,500,000.$13.5 million. The Wilshire Joint Venture is repositioning, and intends to reposition and re-lease the existing improvements on the property.

18

Pursuant to the Wilshire Joint Venture Agreement, 3032 Wilshire SM will managemanages and conductconducts the day-to-day operations and affairs of the Wilshire Joint Venture, subject to certain major decisions set forth in the Wilshire Joint Venture Agreement that require the consent of all the Wilshire Members. Income, losses and distributions willare generally be allocated based on the Wilshire Members’ respective capital and profits interests. Additionally, in certain circumstances described in the Wilshire Joint Venture Agreement, the Company may be required to make additional capital contributions to the Wilshire Joint Venture, in proportion to the Wilshire Members’ respective ownership interests. Until the Company has received back its capital contribution and specified preferred returns, all distributions go to the Company; thereafter, the Wilshire Joint Venture will distribute the profits 50% to the Company and 50% to 3032 Wilshire SM.


14

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

The following reflects the assets and liabilities of the Gelson’s Joint Venture and the Wilshire Joint Venture, which were consolidated by the Company, as of March 31, 2016:

  March 31, 2016 
ASSETS    
Properties under development and development costs:    
   Land $25,851,000 
   Building  613,000 
   Development costs  901,000 
Properties under development and development costs  27,365,000 
Loan reserves  3,458,000 
Cash and cash equivalents  67,000 
Prepaid expenses and deposits  36,000 
Accounts receivable  11,000 
     TOTAL ASSETS (1) $30,937,000 
     
LIABILITIES    
Notes payable, net (2) $18,573,000 
Accrued liabilities  331,000 
Security deposits  40,000 
     TOTAL LIABILITIES $18,944,000 

2017 and December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
 March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
ASSETS   
Properties under development and development costs:   
Land$25,851
 $25,851
Buildings597
 601
Development costs5,645
 4,377
Properties under development and development costs32,093
 30,829
Restricted cash1,956
 1,666
Cash and cash equivalents317
 334
Prepaid expenses and other assets, net19
 14
Tenant receivables, net
 1
TOTAL ASSETS (1)
$34,385
 $32,844
    
LIABILITIES   
Notes payable, net (2)
$19,106
 $19,103
Accounts payable and accrued expenses432
 806
Amounts due to affiliates9
 9
Other liabilities27
 27
TOTAL LIABILITIES$19,574
 $19,945
(1)The assets of the Gelson’s Joint Venture and Wilshire Joint Venture can be used only to settle obligations of the respective consolidated joint ventures.

(2)Includes $627,000As of both March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, includes reclassification of approximately $0.1 million, respectively, of deferred financing costs, net, as a contra-liability. The creditors of the consolidated joint ventures do not have recourse to the general credit of the Company. The notes payable of the consolidated joint ventures are not guaranteed by the Company.

6. FUTURE MINIMUM RENTAL INCOME

Operating Leases

The Company’s real estate properties are leased to tenants under operating leases for which the terms and expirations vary. As of March 31, 2016,2017, the leases at the Company’s properties have remaining terms (excluding options to extend) of up to 2019 years with a weighted-average remaining term (excluding options to extend) of 5approximately five years. The leases may have provisions to extend the lease agreements, options for early termination after paying a specified penalty, rights of first refusal to purchase the property at competitive market rates, and other terms and conditions as negotiated. The Company retains substantially all of the risks and benefits of ownership of the real estate assets leased to tenants. Generally, upon the execution of a lease, the Company requires security deposits from tenants in the form of a cash deposit and/or a letter of credit. Amounts required as security deposits vary depending upon the terms of the respective leases and the creditworthiness of the tenant, but generally are not significant amounts. Therefore, exposure to credit risk exists to the extent that a receivable from a tenant exceeds the amount of its security deposit. Security deposits received in cash related to tenant leases are included in other liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets and totaled $171,000 and $175,000approximately $0.3 million as of March 31, 20162017 and $0.2 million as of December 31, 2015, respectively.

19
2016.


15

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

As of March 31, 2016,2017, the future minimum rental income from the Company’s properties under non-cancelable operating leases, excluding properties held for sale, was as follows:

April 1 through remainder of 2016 $5,374,000 
2017  6,346,000 
2018  5,266,000 
2019  4,664,000 
2020  3,887,000 
Thereafter  7,739,000 
Total $33,276,000 

follows (amounts in thousands):

Remainder of 2017$4,575
20185,669
20195,384
20204,944
20214,184
Thereafter14,310
Total$39,066
7. ACQUIRED LEASE INTANGIBLES AND BELOW-MARKET LEASE LIABILITIES,

NET

As of March 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, the Company’s acquired lease intangibles and below-market lease liabilities were as follows:

  Lease Intangibles  Below-Market Lease Liabilities 
  March 31, 2016  December 31, 2015  March 31, 2016  December 31, 2015 
Cost $7,775,000  $8,089,000  $(4,346,000) $(4,463,000)
Accumulated amortization  (3,694,000)  (3,799,000)  1,115,000   1,160,000 
Total $4,081,000  $4,290,000  $(3,231,000) $(3,303,000)

follows (amounts in thousands):

 Lease Intangibles Below-Market Lease Liabilities
 March 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 March 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
Cost$8,154
 $7,000
 $(3,953) $(3,904)
Accumulated amortization(3,538) (3,175) 892
 855
Total$4,616
 $3,825
 $(3,061) $(3,049)
The Company’s amortization of lease intangibles and below-market lease liabilities for the three months ended March 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, were as follows:

  Lease Intangibles  Below-Market Lease Liabilities 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2016  2015  2016  2015 
Amortization $(251,000) $(593,000) $72,000  $117,000 

follows (amounts in thousands): 

 Lease Intangibles Below-Market Lease Liabilities
 Three Months Ended
March 31,
 Three Months Ended
March 31,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Amortization$(371) $(251) $79
 $72
8. NOTES PAYABLE, NET

As of March 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, the Company’s notes payable, net, excluding long-term debt associatedcredit facility balances with assetsKeyBank which arehave been classified as held for sale, consisted of the following:

  Principal Balance  Interest Rates At 
  March 31, 2016  December 31, 2015  March 31, 2016 
KeyBank credit facility(1) $6,000,000  $-   2.94% 
Secured term loans  24,595,000   24,701,000   5.10% 
Mortgage loans  9,652,000   9,690,000   5.63% 
Mortgage loans secured by properties under development(2)  19,200,000   -   9.5% - 10.0% 
Deferred financing costs, net(3)  (938,000)  (339,000)  n/a 
  $58,509,000  $34,052,000     

following (amounts in thousands):
 Principal Balance Interest Rates At
 March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 March 31, 2017
KeyBank credit facility (1)
$18,668
 $11,150
 1.92%
Secured term loans24,163
 24,277
 5.10%
Mortgage loans secured by properties under development (2)
19,200
 19,200
 9.5% - 10.0%
Deferred financing costs, net (3)
(297) (323) n/a
 $61,734
 $54,304
  
(1)The KeyBank credit facility is a revolving credit facility with an initial maximum aggregate commitment of $30,000,000$30.0 million (the “Facility Amount”). SubjectEffective February 15, 2017, the KeyBank credit facility was refinanced to certain terms and conditions contained inincrease the loan documents,maximum aggregate commitment under the Company may request that the Facility Amount be increasedcredit facility from $30.0 million to a maximum of $60,000,000.$60.0 million. The KeyBank credit facility matures on August 4, 2017.February 15, 2020. Each loan made pursuant to the Amended and Restated Credit FacilityKey Bank credit facility will be either a LIBOR rate loan or a base rate loan, at the election of the Company, plus an applicable margin, as defined. Monthly payments are interest only with the entire principal balance and all outstanding interest due at maturity. The Company will pay KeyBank an unused commitment fee, quarterly in arrears, which will accrue at 0.30% per annum, if the usage under the KeyBank credit facility is less than or equal to 50% of the Facility Amount, and 0.20% per annum if the usage under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility is greater than 50% of the Facility Amount. The Company is providing a guaranty of all of its obligations under the KeyBank credit facility and all other loan documents in connection with the KeyBank credit facility.documents. As of March 31, 2016, the KeyBank credit facility was secured by Pinehurst Square and Topaz Marketplace. For information regarding recent draws under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility, see “– Recent Financing Transactions - KeyBank Credit Facility.”

20

16


STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

March 31, 2017, the KeyBank credit facility was secured by Topaz Marketplace, 8 Octavia Street, 400 Grove Street, the Fulton Shops, 450 Hayes, 388 Fulton, Silver Lake and Woodland West Marketplace. For information regarding recent draws under the Key Bank Credit Facility, see “– Recent Financing Transactions KeyBank Credit Facility” below.
(2)Comprised of $10,700,000$10.7 million and $8,500,000$8.5 million associated with the Company’s investment in the Gelson’s Joint Venture and the Wilshire Joint Venture, respectively.

(3)Reclassification of deferred financing costs, net of accumulated depreciation,amortization, as a contra-liability in accordance with ASU 2015-03.contra-liability.

During the three months ended March 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company incurred and expensed $600,000approximately $0.6 million and $1,694,000,$0.6 million, respectively, of interest costs, which included the amortization and write-off of deferred financing costs of $121,000 and $162,000, respectively.approximately $0.1 million for each period. Also during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company incurred and capitalized $328,000approximately $0.9 million and $0.3 million, respectively, of interest expense related to the variable interest entities, which included the amortization of deferred financing costs of $86,000.

approximately $0.2 million and $86 thousand, respectively.

As of both March 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, interest expense payable was $337,000 and $199,000, respectively,approximately $0.4 million, including an amount related to the variable interest entities of $149,000approximately $0.2 million as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The following is a schedule of future principal payments for all of the Company’s notes payable outstanding as of March 31, 2016:

  Amount 
April 1 through remainder of 2016 $434,000 
2017  35,185,000 
2018  473,000 
2019  23,355,000 
Total(1) $59,447,000 

2017 (amounts in thousands): 
Remainder of 2017$19,535
2018473
201923,355
202018,668
   Total (1)
$62,031
(1)Total future principal payments reflect actual amounts due to creditors, and excludes reclassification of $938,000$0.3 million deferred financing costs, net.

Recent Financing Transactions

KeyBank Credit Facility

During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the following transactions occurred under the KeyBank credit facility:
On January 4, 2017, the Company drew $4.0 million and used the proceeds to acquire 388 Fulton.
On January 6, 2017, the Company consummated the disposition of Pinehurst Square East, located in Bismarck, North Dakota, for a sales price of approximately $19.2 million in cash, $18.4 million of which was used to pay down the KeyBank credit facility.
On January 11, 2017, the Company drew $11.0 million and used the proceeds to acquire Silver Lake.
On January 27, 2017, the Company drew $1.0 million and used the proceeds for working capital.
On February 28, 2017, the Company drew $9.8 million and used the proceeds to pay off the mortgage loan related to Woodland West Marketplace.
On February 28, 2017, the Company drew $0.6 million and used the proceeds to pay certain costs for the refinancing of the KeyBank credit facility.
On March 29, 2017, the Company drew $1.0 million and used the proceeds for working capital.
On March 7, 2016, the Company drew $6.0 million under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility and used the proceeds to invest in the Wilshire Joint Venture.

Mortgage Loans Secured by Properties Under Development

In connection with the Company’s investment in the Wilshire Joint Venture and the acquisition of the Wilshire Property, the Company has consolidated borrowings of $8,500,000$8.5 million (the “Wilshire Loan”) from Buchanan Mortgage Holdings, LLC (as the lender) and 3032 Wilshire Investors, LLC (as the borrower). The Wilshire Loan bears interest at a rate of 10.0% per annum, payable monthly, commencing on April 1, 2016. The loan matureswas scheduled to mature on March 7, 2017, with an option for antwo additional six-month period,periods, subject to certain conditions as stated in the loan agreement. All conditions to extensions were

17

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

met, and on March 7, 2017, the Company exercised the option to extend the loan for six months. The new maturity date is September 7, 2017. The loan is secured by, among other things, a lien on the Wilshire development project and other collateral as defined in the loan agreement.

In connection with the Company’s investment in the Gelson’s Joint Venture and the acquisition of the Gelson’s Property, the Company has consolidated borrowings of $10,700,000$10.7 million (the “Gelson’s Loan”) from Buchanan Mortgage Holdings, LLC (as the lender) and Sunset and Gardner Investors, LLC (as the borrower). The Gelson’s Loan bears interest at a rate of 9.50%9.5% per annum, payable monthly, commencing on April 1, 2016. The loan matureswas scheduled to mature on January 27, 2017, with an option to extend for an additional six-month period, subject to certain conditions as stated in the loan agreement. Those conditions were not met, but the Company negotiated a six month extension of the term on January 27, 2017. The new maturity date is July 27, 2017. The loan is secured by, among other things, a lien on the Gelson’s development project and other joint venture collateral as defined in the loan agreement.

21

9. FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES

Certain financial assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company determines fair value using the following hierarchy:
Level 1: unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities;
Level 2: quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active, and model-derived valuations in which significant inputs and significant value drivers are observable in active markets; and
Level 3: prices or valuation techniques where little or no market data is available for inputs that are significant to the fair value measurement.
The Company believes the total carrying values reflected on its condensed consolidated balance sheets reasonably approximate the fair values for cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and amounts due to affiliates reasonably approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature, except for the Company’s notes payable, which are disclosed below.

nature.

The fair value of the Company’s notes payable is estimated using a present value technique based on contractual cash flows and management’s observations of current market interest rates for instruments with similar characteristics, including remaining loan term, loan-to-value ratio, type of collateral and other credit enhancements. The Company significantly reduces the amount of judgment and subjectivity in its fair value determination through the use of cash flow inputs that are based on contractual obligations. Discount rates are determined by observing interest rates published by independent market participants for comparable instruments. The Company classifies these inputs as Level 2 inputs.

The following table provides the carrying values and fair values of the Company’s notes payable related to continuing operations as of March 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015:

March 31, 2016 Carrying Value (1)  Fair Value(2) 
Notes Payable $58,509,000  $59,163,000 

December 31, 2015 Carrying Value(1)  Fair Value(2) 
Notes Payable $34,052,000  $34,760,000 

2016 (amounts in thousands):
 
Carrying Value (1)
 
Fair Value (1) (2)
 March 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
 March 31,
2017
 December 31,
2016
Notes payable, net$61,734
 $54,304
 $61,906
 $54,781
(1)The carrying value of the Company’s notes payable represents the outstanding principal as of March 31, 20162017, and December 31, 2015.2016. The carrying values and fair values of the notes payable include the reclassification of deferred financing costs, net, of $938,000 and $339,000,approximately $0.3 million as a contra-liability, as of both March 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015, respectively.2016.

(2)The estimated fair value of the notes payable is based upon the indicative market prices of the Company’s notes payable based on prevailing market interest rates.

10. EQUITY

Common Stock

Under

As part of the Company’s Articlesongoing evaluation of Amendment and Restatement (the “Charter”),the Company’s real estate portfolio, the Company hasestimates the authority to issue 400,000,000 shares of common stock. All shares of common stock have a parfair value of $0.01 per share.

On February 7, 2013, the Company terminated the Offering and ceased offering its securities. The Company sold 10,688,940 shares of common stockinvestments in its primary offering for gross offering proceeds of $104,700,000, sold 391,182 shares of common stock under the DRIP for gross offering proceeds of $3,600,000, granted 50,000 shares of restricted stock and issued 273,729 common shares to pay a portionreal estate by obtaining outside independent appraisals on all of the Special Distribution. Cumulatively, throughproperties. The appraised values are compared with the carrying values of its real estate portfolio to determine if there are indications of impairment.

For both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has redeemed 396,624 shares sold in the Offering for $3,197,000.

Common Units and Special Units

The Company’s prior advisor, TNP Strategic Retail Advisor, LLC, invested $1,000 in the OP in exchange for Common Unitsdid not record any impairment losses.


18

Table of the OP which were sold to GPP on January 24, 2014. On May 26, 2011, in connection with the acquisition of Pinehurst Square East, a retail property located in Bismarck, North Dakota, the OP issued 287,472 Common Units to certain of the sellers of Pinehurst Square East who elected to receive Common Units for an aggregate value of approximately $2.6 million, or $9.00 per Common Unit. On March 12, 2012, in connection with the acquisition of Turkey Creek, a retail property located in Knoxville, Tennessee, the OP issued 144,324 Common Units to certain of the sellers of Turkey Creek who elected to receive Common Units for an aggregate value of approximately $1.4 million, or $9.50 per Common Unit.

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, in April 2014 the Company caused the OP to issue to the Advisor a separate series of limited partnership interests of the OP in exchange for a capital contribution to the OP of $1,000 (the “Special Units”). The terms of the Special Units entitle the Advisor to (i) 15% of the Company’s net sale proceeds upon disposition of its assets after the Company’s stockholders receive a return of their investment plus a 7% cumulative, non-compounded rate of return or (ii) an equivalent amount in the event that the Company lists its shares of common stock on a national securities exchange or upon certain terminations of the Advisory Agreement after the Company’s stockholders are deemed to have received a return of their investment plus a 7% cumulative, non-compounded rate of return.

The holders of Common Units, other than the Company and the holder of the Special Units, generally have the right to cause the OP to redeem all or a portion of their Common Units for, at the Company’s sole discretion, shares of the Company’s common stock, cash or a combination of both. If the Company elects to redeem Common Units for shares of common stock, the Company will generally deliver one share of common stock for each Common Unit redeemed. Holders of Common Units, other than the Company and the holders of the Special Units, may exercise their redemption rights at any time after one year following the date of issuance of their Common Units; provided, however, that a holder of Common Units may not deliver more than two redemption notices in a single calendar year and may not exercise a redemption right for less than 1,000 Common Units, unless such holder holds less than 1,000 Common Units, in which case, it must exercise its redemption right for all of its Common Units.

Member Interests

On July 9, 2013, SRT Manager made a cash investment of approximately $1.9 million in Secured Holdings pursuant to a Membership Interest Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, SRT Manager, Secured Holdings, and the OP, which resulted in SRT Manager owning a 12% membership interest in Secured Holdings and the OP owning the remaining 88% membership interest in Secured Holdings. The Company’s independent directors negotiated and approved the transaction in order to help enable the Company to meet its short-term liquidity needs for operations, as well as to build working capital for future operations. Following the Constitution Transaction on August 4, 2014 (see Note 8. “Notes Payable”), the OP owned a 91.67% membership interest in Secured Holdings and SRT Manager owned an 8.33% membership interest in Secured Holdings. In connection with the sale of Secured Holding’s two properties to the SGO Joint Venture, Secured Holdings paid SRT Manager approximately $2.1 million in full redemption of the then current value of its remaining 8.33% membership interest in Secured Holdings.

Preferred Stock

The Charter authorizes the Company to issue 50,000,000 shares of $0.01 par value preferred stock. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, no shares of preferred stock were issued and outstanding.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

10. EQUITY
Share Redemption Program

On April 1, 2015, the Company’s board of directors approved the reinstatement of the share redemption program (which had been suspended since January 15, 2013) and adopted an Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program (the “Amended“SRP”). The SRP was subsequently amended on August 7, 2015 and Restated SRP”). UnderAugust 10, 2016.
On October 5, 2016, the Amended and Restatedboard of directors approved, pursuant to Section 3(a) of SRP, onlyan additional $0.5 million of funds available for the redemption of shares submitted for repurchase in connection with the death or “qualifying disability” (as defined in the Amended and Restated SRP) of a stockholder are eligible for repurchase by the Company. stockholder. 
The number of shares to be redeemed is limited to the lesser of (i) a total of $2,000,000 for redemptions sought upon a stockholder’s death and a total of $1,000,000 for redemptions sought upon a stockholder’s qualifying disability, and (ii) 5% of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year. Share repurchases pursuant to thefollowing table summarizes share redemption program are made at the sole discretion of the Company. The Company reserves the right to reject any redemption request for any reason or no reason or to amend or terminate the share redemption program at any time subject to the notice requirements in the Amended and Restated SRP.

The redemption price for shares that are redeemed is 100% of the Company’s most recent estimated net asset value per share as of the applicable redemption date. A redemption request must be made within one year after the stockholder’s death or disability, unless such death or disability occurred between January 15, 2013 and April 1, 2015, when the share redemption program was suspended. Any stockholder whose death or disability occurred during this time period must submit their redemption request within one year after the adoption of the Amended and Restated SRP.

23

The Amended and Restated SRP provides that any request to redeem less than $5,000 worth of shares will be treated as a request to redeem all of the stockholder’s shares. If the Company cannot honor all redemption requests received in a given quarter, all requests, including death and disability redemptions, will be honored on a pro rata basis. If the Company does not completely satisfy a redemption request in one quarter, it will treat the unsatisfied portion as a request for redemption in the next quarter when funds are available for redemption, unless the request is withdrawn. The Company may increase or decrease the amount of funding available for redemptions under the Amended and Restated SRP on ten business days’ notice to stockholders. Shares submitted for redemption during any quarter will be redeemed on the penultimate business day of such quarter. The record date for quarterly distributions has historically been and is expected to continue to be the last business day of each quarter; therefore, shares that are redeemed during any quarter are expected to be redeemed prior to the record date and thus would not be eligible to receive the distribution declared for such quarter.

The other material terms of the Amended and Restated SRP are consistent with the terms of the share redemption program that was in effect immediately prior to January 15, 2013.

On August 7, 2015, the board of directors approved the amendment and restatement of the Amended and Restated SRP (the “Second Amended and Restated SRP” and, together with the Amended and Restated SRP, the “SRP”). Under the Second Amended and Restated SRP, the redemption date with respect to third quarter 2015 redemptions was November 10, 2015 or the next practicable date as the Chief Executive Officer determined so that redemptions with respect to the third quarter of 2015 were delayed until after the payment date for the Special Distribution. With this revision, stockholders who were to have 100% of their shares redeemed were not left holding a small number of shares from the Special Distribution after the date of the redemption of their shares. The other material terms of the Second Amended and Restated SRP are consistent with the terms of the Amended and Restated SRP.  

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, the Company redeemed 30,721 shares of common stock for $202,000 under the SRP. The Company did not redeem any sharesactivity during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands, except shares):

 Three Months Ended
March 31,
 2017 2016
Shares of common stock redeemed31,875
 30,721
Purchase price$203
 $202
Cumulatively, through March 31, 2017, the Company has redeemed 507,069 shares sold in the Offering and/or its dividend reinvestment plan for $3.9 million.
Quarterly Distributions

In order to qualify as a REIT, the Company is required to distribute at least 90% of its annual REIT taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, to its stockholders. Some or all of the Company’s distributions have been paid, and in the future may continue to be paid from sources other than cash flows from operations.

Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Credit Facility,amended Key Bank credit facility, the Company may pay distributions to its investors so long as the total amount paid does not exceed 100% of the cumulative Adjusted Funds From Operations plus up to an additional $2.0 million of the Company’s net proceeds from property dispositions, as defined in the amended KeyBank credit facility; provided, however, that the Company is not restricted from making any distributions necessary in order to maintain its status as a REIT. The Company’s board of directors evaluates the Company’s ability to make quarterly distributions based on the Company’s operational cash needs.

The following tables set forth the quarterly distributions declared to the Company’s common stockholders and Common Unit holders for the year ended December 31, 2015. Distributions to its common stockholders and common unit holders for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were declared subsequent to March2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016 as described(amounts in Note 14. “Subsequent Events.”

  Distribution
Record
Date
 Distribution
Payable
Date
 Distribution Per
Share of
Common Stock /
Common Unit
  Total Common
Stockholders
Distribution
  Total Common
Unit Holders
Distribution
  Total
Distribution
 
First Quarter 2015 3/31/2015 4/30/2015 $0.06  $658,000  $26,000  $684,000 
Second Quarter 2015 6/30/2015 7/30/2015 $0.06   654,000   26,000   680,000 
Third Quarter 2015 9/30/2015 10/31/2015 $0.06   654,000   26,000   680,000 
Fourth Quarter 2015 12/31/2015 1/30/2016 $0.06   661,000   25,000   686,000 
Total         $2,627,000  $103,000  $2,730,000 

24
thousands, except per share amounts):

 
Distribution Record
Date
 
Distribution
Payable
Date
 
Distribution Per Share of Common Stock /
Common Unit
 
Total Common
Stockholders
Distribution
 
Total Common
Unit Holders
Distribution
 
Total
Distribution
First Quarter 20173/31/2017 4/28/2017 $0.06
 $655
 $25
 $680
 
Distribution Record
Date
 
Distribution
Payable
Date
 
Distribution Per Share of Common Stock /
Common Unit
 
Total Common
Stockholders
Distribution
 
Total Common
Unit Holders
Distribution
 
Total
Distribution
First Quarter 20163/31/2016 4/29/2016 $0.06
 $660
 $26
 $686
Second Quarter 20167/7/2016 7/29/2016 0.06
 661
 25
 686
Third Quarter 20169/30/2016 10/31/2016 0.06
 659
 25
 684
Fourth Quarter 201612/30/2016 1/31/2017 0.06
 656
 25
 681
Total      $2,636
 $101
 $2,737

19

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)

11. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income (loss) attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted EPS is computed after adjusting the basic EPS computation for the effect of potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. The effect of non-vested shares, if dilutive, is computed using the treasury stock method. The Company applies the two-class method for determining EPS as its outstanding shares of non-vested restricted stock are considered participating securities as dividend payments are not forfeited even if the underlying award does not vest. There iswas no unvested stock as of March 31, 2016.2017. The Company’s excess of distributions over earnings related to participating securities are shown as a reduction in income (loss) attributable to common stockholders in the Company’s computation of EPS.

The following table sets forth the computation of the Company’s basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 (amounts in thousands, except shares and 2015:

  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2016  2015 
Numerator - basic and diluted        
Net income (loss) from continuing operations $(65,000) $3,122,000 
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests  (2,000)  261,000 
Net income (loss) attributable to common shares $(63,000) $2,861,000 
Denominator - basic and diluted        
Basic weighted average common shares  11,037,189   10,969,714 
Effect of dilutive securities  -   - 
Common Units(1)  -   - 
Diluted weighted average common shares  11,037,189   10,969,714 
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic and diluted        
Net earnings (loss) attributable to common shares $(0.01) $0.26 

per share amounts):
 Three Months Ended March 31,
 2017 2016
Numerator - basic and diluted   
Net income (loss)$6,179
 $(65)
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests230
 (2)
Net income (loss) attributable to common shares$5,949
 $(63)
Denominator - basic and diluted   
Basic weighted average common shares10,937,451
 11,037,189
Common Units (1)

 
Diluted weighted average common shares10,937,451
 11,037,189
Earnings (loss) per common share - basic and diluted   
Net earnings (loss) attributable to common shares$0.54
 $(0.01)
(1)The effect of 431,896422,308 convertible Common Units pursuant to the redemption rights outlined in the Company’s registration statement on Form S-11 have not been included as they would not be dilutive.

25

12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On August 7, 2013, the Company entered into the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor. On August 3, 2015,10, 2016, the Advisory Agreement with the Advisor was renewed for an additional twelve months, beginning on August 10, 2015.2016. The Advisor manages the Company’s business as the Company’s external advisor pursuant to the Advisory Agreement. Pursuant to the Advisory Agreement, the Company will pay the Advisor specified fees for services related to the investment of funds in real estate and real estate-related investments, management of the Company’s investments and for other services.

On July 9, 2013, SRT Manager, an affiliate of Advisor, acquired an initial 12% membership interest in SRT Holdings, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary. Following the Constitution Transaction on August 4, 2014 (see Note 8. “Notes Payable”), SRT Manager’s membership interests in SRT Holdings decreased to 8.33%. In March 2015, SRT Holdings paid SRT Manager $2,102,000 in full redemption of SRT Manager’s 8.33% membership interest in SRT Holdings.

On January 24, 2014, GPP purchased 22,222 and 111,111 shares of the Company from TNP LLC and Sharon D. Thompson, respectively, for $8.00 per share. The share purchase transaction was part of a larger settlement of issues relating to the 2013 annual meeting proxy contest and was not considered an arm’s length transaction. Therefore, the share purchase price may not reflect a market price or value for such securities (see Note 10. “Equity”).

On March 11, 2015, the Company, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement of SGO Retail Acquisitions Venture, LLC to form the SGO Joint Venture. On September 30, 2015, the Company, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into the Limited Liability Company Agreement of SGO MN Retail Acquisitions Venture, LLC to form the SGO MN Joint Venture. For additional information regarding the SGO Joint Venture and the SGO MN Joint Venture, seerefer to Note 4. “Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures.”


20

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

Summary of Related Party Fees

Summarized separately below are the Advisor related party costs incurred and payable by the Company for the periods presented:

Advisorpresented (amounts in thousands):

  Incurred Payable as of
  Three Months Ended March 31, March 31, December 31,
Expensed 2017 2016 2017 2016
Acquisition fees $
 $2
 $
 $80
Asset management fees 230
 217
 79
 
Reimbursement of operating expenses 42
 50
 4
 
Property management fees 113
 124
 31
 2
Disposition fees 244
 
 
 29
Total $629
 $393
 $114
 $111
         
Capitalized        
Acquisition fees $194
 $273
 $
 $
Leasing fees 57
 10
 
 
Legal leasing fees 27
 12
 
 
Construction management fees 
 1
 
 
Financing coordination fees 707
 
 
 
Total $985
 $296
 $
 $
Acquisition Fees

 Incurred  Payable as of 
  Three Months Ended March 31,  March 31,  December 31, 
Expensed 2016  2015  2016  2015 
Acquisition fees $2,000  $-  $-  $- 
Asset management fees  217,000   320,000   -   19,000 
Reimbursement of operating expenses  50,000   -   8,000   27,000 
Property management fees  124,000   201,000   37,000   3,000 
Disposition fees  -   525,000   -   - 
Guaranty fees(1)  -   1,000   -   - 
Total $393,000  $1,047,000  $45,000  $49,000 
                 
Capitalized                
Acquisition fees $273,000  $-  $139,000  $- 
Leasing fees  10,000   27,000   -   - 
Legal leasing fees  12,000   38,000   -   - 
Construction management fees  1,000   5,000   -   - 
Total $296,000  $70,000  $139,000  $- 

(1)Guaranty fees were paid by the Company to its prior advisor, TNP Strategic Retail Advisor, LLC.

Acquisition Fee

Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is entitled to receive an acquisition fee equal to 1.0%1% of (1) the cost of each investment acquired directly by the Company or (2) the Company’s allocable cost of an investment acquired pursuant to a joint venture, in each case including purchase price, acquisition expenses and any debt attributable to such investments. An acquisition fee is capitalized by the Company when the related transaction does not qualityqualify as a business combination.

26
combination; otherwise an acquisition fee is expensed.

Origination Fee

Fees

Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is entitled to receive an origination fee equal to 1.0%1% of the amount funded by the Company to acquire or originate real estate-related loans, including any acquisition expenses related to such investment and any debt used to fund the acquisition or origination of the real estate-related loans. The Company will not pay an origination fee to the Advisor with respect to any transaction pursuant to which it is required to pay the Advisor an acquisition fee.

Financing Coordination Fee

Fees

Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is entitled to receive a financing coordination fee equal to 1% of the amount made available and/or outstanding under any (1) financing obtained or assumed, directly or indirectly, by the Company or the OP and used to acquire or originate investments;investments, or (2) the refinancing of any financing obtained or assumed, directly or indirectly, by the Company or the OP.

Asset Management Fee

Fees

Under the Advisory Agreement, the Advisor is entitled to receive an asset management fee equal to a monthly fee of one-twelfth (1/12th) of 0.6% of the higher of (1) aggregate cost on a GAAP basis (before non-cash reserves and depreciation) of all investments the Company owns, including any debt attributable to such investments;investments, or (2) the fair market value of the Company’s investments (before non-cash reserves and deprecation)depreciation) if the board of directors has authorized the estimate of a fair market value of the Company’s investments; provided, however, that the asset management fee will not be less than $250,000 in the aggregate during any one calendar year.


21

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

Reimbursement of Operating Expenses

The Company reimburses the Advisor for all expenses paid or incurred by the Advisor in connection with the services provided to the Company, subject to the limitation that the Company will not reimburse the Advisor for any amount by which the Company’s total operating expenses (including the asset management fee described below) at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceeded the greater of (1) 2% of its average invested assets (as defined in the Charter)Company’s Articles of Amendment and Restatement (the “Charter”)); or (2) 25% of its net income (as defined in the Charter) determined without reduction for any additions to depreciation, bad debts or other similar non-cash expenses and excluding any gain from the sale of the Company’s assets for that period (the “2%/25% Guideline”). The Advisor is required to reimburse the Company quarterly for any amounts by which total operating expenses exceed the 2%/25% Guideline in the previous expense year that the independent directors do not approve. The Company will not reimburse the Advisor for any of its personnel costs or other overhead costs except for customary reimbursements for personnel costs under property management agreements entered into between the OP and the Advisor or its affiliates. Notwithstanding the above, the Company may reimburse the Advisor for expenses in excess of the 2%/25% Guideline if a majority of the independent directors determine that such excess expenses are justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors.

For the three months ended March 31, 20162017 and 2015,2016, the Company’s total operating expenses (as defined in the Charter) did not exceed the 2%/25% Guideline.

Property Management Fee

Fees

Under the property management agreements between the Company and Glenborough, Glenborough is entitled to receive property management fees calculated at a maximum of up to 4% of the properties’ gross revenue. The property management agreements with Glenborough have been renewed for an additional twelve months, beginningare subject to review and renewal on August 10, 2015.

9, 2017.

Disposition Fee

Fees

Under the Advisory Agreement, if the Advisor or its affiliates provide a substantial amount of services, as determined by the Company’s independent directors, in connection with the sale of a real property, the Advisor or its affiliates may be paid disposition fees up to 50% of a customary and competitive real estate commission, but not to exceed 3% of the contract sales price of each property sold.

27

Guaranty Fees

In connection with certain acquisition financings, the Company’s former chairman and former co-chief executive officer and/or TNP LLC had executed certain guaranty agreements to the respective lenders. As consideration for such guaranty, the Company entered into a reimbursement and fee agreement to provide for an upfront payment and an annual guaranty fee payment for the duration of the guarantee period. In March 2015, the Company retired the outstanding notes payable related to Osceola Village resulting in the expiration of the remaining guaranty agreement.

Leasing Fee

Fees

Under the property management agreements, Glenborough is entitled to receive a separate fee for the leases of new tenants, and for expansions, extensions and renewals of existing tenants in an amount not to exceed the fee customarily charged by similarly situated parties rendering similar services in the same geographic area for similar properties.

Legal Leasing Fee

Fees

Under the property management agreements, Glenborough is entitled to receive a market-based legal leasing fee for the negotiation and production of new leases, renewals, and amendments.

Construction Management Fee

Fees

In connection with the construction or repair in or about a property, the property manager is responsible for coordinating and facilitating the planning and the performance of all construction and is entitled to receive a fee equal to 5% of the hard costs for the project in question.

Related-Party Fees Paid by the Unconsolidated Joint Ventures

The unconsolidated joint ventures are party to certain agreements with Glenborough for services related to the investment of funds and management of the joint ventures’ investments, as well as the day-to-day management, operation and maintenance of the properties owned by the joint ventures. The joint ventures pay fees to Glenborough for these services. TheFor the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the SGO Joint Venture recognized related party fees and reimbursements of $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively. For both the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the SGO MN Joint Venture recognized related-partyrelated party fees and reimbursements of approximately $150,000 and $234,000, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2016.$0.2 million. The related-party amounts consist of property management, asset management, leasing commission, legal leasing, construction management fees and salary reimbursements.

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Economic Dependency

The Company is dependent on the Advisor and its affiliates for certain services that are essential to the Company, including the identification, evaluation, negotiation, purchase, and disposition of real estate and real estate-related investments,

22

STRATEGIC REALTY TRUST, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (continued)
(unaudited)

management of the daily operations of the Company’s real estate and real estate-related investment portfolio, and other general and administrative responsibilities. In the event that the Advisor is unable to provide such services to the Company, the Company will be required to obtain such services from other sources.

Environmental

As an owner of real estate, the Company is subject to various environmental laws of federal, state and local governments. The Company is not aware of any environmental liability that could have a material adverse effect on its condensed consolidated financial condition or results of operations. However, changes in applicable environmental laws and regulations, the uses and conditions of properties in the vicinity of the Company’s properties, the activities of its tenants and other environmental conditions of which the Company is unaware with respect to the properties could result in future environmental liabilities.

28

14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

First Quarter Distribution

Distributions
On April 6, 2016,28, 2017, the Company declaredpaid a first quarter distribution in the amount of $0.06 per share/unit to common stockholders and holders of common units of record as of March 31, 2016,2017, totaling $686,000.approximately $0.7 million.
On May 10, 2017, the Company’s board of directors approved a second quarter distribution in the amount of $0.06 per share/unit to common stockholders and holders of common units of record as of June 30, 2017. The Company expects to pay this distribution was paid on April 29, 2016.

by the end of July 2017.

Sale of Held for Sale Property and Payment of Mortgage Loan

Properties

On April 4, 2016,17, 2017, the Company consummated the disposition of Bloomingdale Hills forWoodland West Marketplace at a sales price of approximately $9.2 million in cash,$14.6 million. The Company used the net proceeds from the sale of Woodland West Marketplace to repay a portion of which was used to pay off the related $5.3 million mortgage loan and $3 million of which was used to pay downoutstanding balance on the line of credit.

Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement

On May 4, 2016, the Company, through an indirect subsidiary, entered into three separate purchase agreements to acquire three retail properties located in San Francisco, California (the “San Francisco Properties”) from each of Octavia Gateway Holdings, LLC, Grove Street Hayes Valley, LLC and Hayes Street Hayes Valley LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company and each a subsidiary of DDG Partners LLC. The sellers are not affiliated with the Company or its external advisor. The San Francisco Properties encompass an aggregate of six retail condominiums with an aggregate of 9,121 square feet of retail space. The aggregate purchase price of the San Francisco Properties is approximately $13.7 million plus closing costs.

Pursuant to the agreements, the Company made aggregate earnest money deposits of $425,000 to the sellers on May 6, 2016. There can be no assurance that the Company will complete the acquisition of any or all of the San Francisco Properties. In some circumstances, if the Company fails to complete the acquisitions, it may forfeit up to $425,000 of earnest money.

KeyBank Credit Facility.


ITEM 2.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the other unaudited financial data included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, on March 30, 2016,24, 2017, which we refer to herein as our “2015“2016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.”
As used herein, the terms “we,” “our,” “us,” and “Company” refer to Strategic Realty Trust, Inc., formerly TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc., and, as required by context, Strategic Realty Operating Partnership, L.P., formerly TNP Strategic Retail Operating Partnership, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, which we refer to as our “operating partnership” or “OP”, and to their respective subsidiaries. References to “shares” and “our common stock” refer to the shares of our common stock.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical facts (including any statements concerning investment objectives, other plans and objectives of management for future operations or economic performance, or assumptions or forecasts related thereto) are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These statements are only predictions. We caution that forward-looking statements are not guarantees. Actual events or our investments and results of operations could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are typically identified by the use of terms such as “may,” “should,” “expect,” “could,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “continue,” “predict,” “potential” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology.

The forward-looking statements included herein are based upon our current expectations, plans, estimates, assumptions and beliefs, which involve numerous risks and uncertainties. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond our control. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, our actual results and performance could differ materially from those set forth in the forward-looking statements. The following are some of the risks and uncertainties, although not all of the risks and uncertainties, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those presented in our forward-looking statements:

·Our executive officers and certain other key real estate professionals are also officers, directors, managers, key professionals and/or holders of a direct or indirect controlling interest in our advisor. As a result, they face conflicts of interest, including conflicts created by our advisor’s compensation arrangements with us and conflicts in allocating time among us and other programs and business activities.

·Our initial public offering has terminated and we are uncertain of our sources for funding our future capital needs. If we cannot obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to continue to acquire real properties or other real estate-related assets, fund or expand our operations and pay distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.

29

Our executive officers and certain other key real estate professionals are also officers, directors, managers, key professionals and/or holders of a direct or indirect controlling interest in our advisor. As a result, they face conflicts of interest, including conflicts created by our advisor’s compensation arrangements with us and conflicts in allocating time among us and other programs and business activities.

·We depend on tenants for our revenue and, accordingly, our revenue is dependent upon the success and economic viability of our tenants. Revenues from our properties could decrease due to a reduction in tenants (caused by factors including, but not limited to, tenant defaults, tenant insolvency, early termination of tenant leases and non-renewal of existing tenant leases) and/or lower rental rates, making it more difficult for us to meet our financial obligations, including debt service and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

·Our current and future investments in real estate and other real estate-related investments may be affected by unfavorable real estate market and general economic conditions, which could decrease the value of those assets and reduce the investment return to our stockholders. Revenues from our properties could decrease. Such events would make it more difficult for us to meet our debt service obligations and limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

·Certain of our debt obligations have variable interest rates with interest and related payments that vary with the movement of LIBOR or other indices. Increases in these indices could increase the amount of our debt payments and limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

We are uncertain of our sources for funding our future capital needs. If we cannot obtain debt or equity financing on acceptable terms, our ability to continue to acquire real properties or other real estate-related assets, fund or expand our operations and pay distributions to our stockholders will be adversely affected.
We depend on tenants for our revenue and, accordingly, our revenue is dependent upon the success and economic viability of our tenants. Revenues from our properties could decrease due to a reduction in tenants (caused by factors including, but not limited to, tenant defaults, tenant insolvency, early termination of tenant leases and non-renewal of existing tenant leases) and/or lower rental rates, making it more difficult for us to meet our financial obligations, including debt service and our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Our current and future investments in real estate and other real estate-related investments may be affected by unfavorable real estate market and general economic conditions, which could decrease the value of those assets and reduce the investment return to our stockholders. Revenues from our properties could decrease. Such events would make it more difficult for us to meet our debt service obligations and limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.
Certain of our debt obligations have variable interest rates with interest and related payments that vary with the movement of LIBOR or other indices. Increases in these indices could increase the amount of our debt payments and limit our ability to pay distributions to our stockholders.

All forward-looking statements should be read in light of the risks identified in Part I, Item 1A of our 20152016 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Any of the assumptions underlying the forward-looking statements included herein could be inaccurate, and undue reliance should not be placed upon on any forward-looking statements included herein. All forward-looking statements are made as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the risk that actual results will differ materially from the expectations expressed herein will increase with the passage of time. Except as otherwise required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements made after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or any other reason. In light of the significant uncertainties inherent in the forward lookingforward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the risks described in Part I, Item 1A of our 20152016 Annual Report on Form 10-K, the inclusion of such forward-looking statements should not be regarded as a representation by us or any other person that the objectives and plans set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q will be achieved.


Overview

We are a Maryland corporation that was formed on September 18, 2008, to invest in and manage a portfolio of income-producing retail properties, located in the United States, real estate-owning entities and real estate-related assets, including the investment in or origination of mortgage, mezzanine, bridge and other loans related to commercial real estate. During the first quarter of 2016, we also invested, through joint ventures, in two significant retail projects under development. We have elected to be taxed as a real estate investment trust (“REIT”) for federal income tax purposes, commencing with the taxable year ended December 31, 2009, and we intend to operate in such a manner. We own substantially all of our assets and conduct our operations through our operating partnership, of which we are the sole general partner. We also own a majority of the outstanding limited partner interests in the operating partnership. We have no paid employees.

On November 4, 2008, we filed a registration statement on Form S-11 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for our initial public offering of up to 100,000,000 shares of our common stock at $10.00 per share in our primary offering and up to 10,526,316 shares of our common stock to our stockholders at $9.50 per share pursuant to our distribution reinvestment plan (“DRIP”) (collectively, the “Offering”). On August 7, 2009, the SEC declared our registration statement effective and we commenced our initial public offering. On February 7, 2013, we terminated our initial public offering and ceased offering shares of our common stock in our primary offering and under our distribution reinvestment plan.

As of February 2013 when we terminated the initial public offering, we had accepted subscriptions for, and issued, 10,688,940 shares of common stock in the initial public offering for gross offering proceeds of $104,700,000, and 391,182 shares of common stock pursuant to the DRIP for gross offering proceeds of $3,620,000. Cumulatively, through March 31, 2016, we have redeemed 396,624 shares of common stock sold in the Offering for $3,197,000. We have also granted 50,000 shares of restricted stock and we issued 273,729 shares of common stock to pay a portion of a special distribution made to stockholders in 2015 to preserve REIT status based on underreporting of federal taxable income in 2011 (the “Special Distribution”).

Due to short-term liquidity issues and defaults under certain of our loan agreements, we suspended our share redemption program, including with respect to redemptions upon death and disability, effective as of January 15, 2013. On April 1, 2015, our board of directors approved the reinstatement of the share redemption program and adopted the Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program (the “Amended and Restated SRP”). For more information regarding our share redemption program, see Part II, Item 2, “Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds – Share Redemption Program.” Cumulatively, through March 31, 2016, we have redeemed 396,624 shares of common stock sold in the Offering for $3,197,000.

30

Since our inception, our business has been managed by an external advisor. We no longerdo not have direct employees and all management and administrative personnel responsible for conducting our business are employed by our advisor. Currently we are externally managed and advised by SRT Advisor, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Advisor”) pursuant to an advisory agreement with the Advisor (the “Advisory Agreement”) initially executed on August 10, 2013, and subsequently renewed in August 2014, August 2015 and August 2015.2016. The current term of the Advisory Agreement terminates on August 10, 2016.2017. The Advisor is an affiliate of Glenborough, LLC (together with its affiliates, “Glenborough”), a privately held full-service real estate investment and management company focused on the acquisition, management and leasing of commercial properties.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Property Portfolio

As of March 31, 2016,2017, our property portfolio included 913 retail properties, including 1one property classified as held for sale, which we refer to as “our properties” or ��our“our portfolio,” comprising an aggregate of approximately 766,000601,000 square feet of single- and multi-tenant, commercial retail space located in 7five states. We purchased our properties for an aggregate purchase price of $96,960,000.approximately $108.7 million. As of March 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, there was $39,592,000approximately $24.2 million and $39,786,000approximately $33.8 million of indebtedness on our properties, respectively, including indebtedness on our held for sale property.respectively. As of March 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, approximately 89% and 90%91% of our portfolio was leased (based on rentable square footage), respectively, with weighted-average remaining lease termsterm of approximately 5 years as of both period ends.

    Rentable
Square
  Percent  Effective
Rent (3)
  Anchor Date Original
Purchase
    
Property Name Location Feet (1)  Leased (2)  (Sq. Foot)  Tenant Acquired Price(4)  Debt (5) 
                      
Real Estate Investments                          
Pinehurst Square Bismarck, ND  114,102   95% $14.35  TJ Maxx 5/26/11 $15,000,000  $- 
Cochran Bypass Chester, SC  45,817   100% $5.24  Bi-Lo 7/14/11  2,585,000   1,506,000 
Topaz Marketplace Hesperia, CA  50,699   62% $24.49  n/a 9/23/11  13,500,000   - 
Morningside Marketplace Fontana, CA  76,923   96% $15.66  Ralphs 1/9/12  18,050,000   8,592,000 
Woodland West Marketplace Arlington, TX  175,258   70% $9.46  Randall's 2/3/12  13,950,000   9,652,000 
Ensenada Square Arlington, TX  62,628   100% $7.28  Kroger 2/27/12  5,025,000   2,980,000 
Shops at Turkey Creek Knoxville, TN  16,324   100% $27.20  n/a 3/12/12  4,300,000   2,696,000 
Florissant Marketplace Florissant, MO  146,257   100% $9.70  Gold's Gym 5/16/12  15,250,000   8,821,000 
     688,008               87,660,000   34,247,000 
                           
Property Held for Sale                          
Bloomingdale Hills Riverside, FL  78,442   94% $8.50  Walmart 6/18/12  9,300,000   5,345,000(6)
                           
     766,450              $96,960,000  $39,592,000 

five years.
(dollars in thousands) 
Rentable Square
Feet (1)
 
Percent
Leased (2)
 
Effective
Rent (3)
(Sq. Foot)
 
Anchor
Tenant
 
Date
Acquired
 
Original
Purchase
 Price (4)
 
Debt (5)
Property Name Location       
Cochran Bypass Chester, SC 45,817
 100% $5.11
 Bi-Lo Store 7/14/2011 $2,585
 $1,479
Topaz Marketplace Hesperia, CA 50,699
 77% 22.14
 n/a 9/23/2011 13,500
 
Morningside Marketplace Fontana, CA 76,923
 96% 16.25
 Ralph's 1/9/2012 18,050
 8,441
Ensenada Square Arlington, TX 62,628
 100% 7.62
 Kroger 2/27/2012 5,025
 2,927
Shops at Turkey Creek Knoxville, TN 16,324
 100% 27.33
 n/a 3/12/2012 4,300
 2,649
Florissant Marketplace Florissant, MO 146,257
 98% 9.87
 Schnuck's 5/16/2012 15,250
 8,666
400 Grove Street San Francisco, CA 2,000
 100% 60.00
 n/a 6/14/2016 2,890
 
8 Octavia Street San Francisco, CA 3,640
 100% 34.92
 n/a 6/14/2016 2,740
 
Fulton Shops San Francisco, CA 3,758
 100% 55.07
 n/a 7/27/2016 4,595
 
450 Hayes San Francisco, CA 3,724
 100% 89.82
 n/a 12/22/2016 8,020
 
388 Fulton San Fancisco, CA 3,110
 100% 63.05
 n/a 1/4/2017 4,500
 
Silver Lake Los Angeles, CA 10,497
 100% 62.96
 n/a 1/11/2017 13,300
 
    425,377
         94,755
 24,162
                 
Property Held for Sale              
Woodland West Marketplace Arlington, TX 175,258
 73% 9.40
 Randall's 2/3/2012 13,950
 
    175,258
         13,950
 
    600,635
         $108,705
 $24,162
(1)Square feet includes improvements made on ground leases at the property.

(2)Percentage is based on leased rentable square feet of each property as of March 31, 2016.2017.

(3)Effective rent per square foot is calculated by dividing the annualized March 20162017 contractual base rent by the total square feet occupied at the property. The contractual base rent does not include other items such as tenant concessions (e.g., free rent), percentage rent, and expense recoveries.

(4)The purchase price for Pinehurst Square and Shops at Turkey Creek includes the issuance of common units in our operating partnership to the sellers.

31

(5)Debt represents the outstanding balance as of March 31, 2016,2017, and excludes reclassification of $311,000approximately $0.2 million deferred financing costs, net, as a contra-liability. For more information on our financing, seerefer to Note 8. “Notes Payable”Payable, Net” to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. As of March 31, 2017, the KeyBank credit facility principal balance of $32.4 million was secured by Topaz Marketplace, 8 Octavia Street, 400 Grove Street, the Fulton Shops, 450 Hayes, 388 Fulton, Silver Lake and Woodland West Marketplace. For information regarding recent draws under the Key Bank credit facility, see “– Recent Financing Transactions - KeyBank Credit Facility.”

(6)Debt of Bloomingdale Hills excludes reclassification of $127,000 deferred financing costs, net, as a contra-liability.


Properties Under Development

As of March 31, 2016,2017, we had 2two properties under development. The properties are identified in the following table:

    Estimated    
  Estimated Expected    
Properties Under Development Completion Date Square Feet  Debt(1) 
3032 Wilshire and 1210 Berkeley Street, Santa Monica, California November, 2017  9,400  $8,500,000 
Sunset Boulevard and Gardner, Hollywood, California March, 2018  38,000   10,700,000 
Total    47,400  $19,200,000 

table (dollar amounts in thousands):
Properties Under Development Location 
Estimated
Completion Date
 
Estimated
Expected
Square Feet
 
Debt (1)
Wilshire Property Santa Monica, CA November, 2017 12,500
 $8,500
Gelson’s Property Hollywood, CA March, 2018 37,000
 10,700
Total     49,500
 $19,200
(1)Debt excludes reclassification of $627,000approximately $0.1 million deferred financing costs, net, as a contra-liability.

Portfolio Investments
As of March 31, 2017, our portfolio included:
Investments in two consolidated joint ventures, which own property under development in Los Angeles, California that are expected to comprise 49,500 square feet upon completion.
Investments in two unconsolidated joint ventures, which own, in aggregate, 9 retail centers, including one center classified as held for sale, comprising an aggregate of approximately 619,000 square feet and located in four states.
Thirteen retail properties, including one property classified as held for sale, comprising an aggregate of approximately 601,000 square feet of single- and multi-tenant, commercial retail space located in five states.
Results of Operations

Comparison of the three months ended March 31, 2016,2017, versus the three months ended March 31, 2015

2016.

The following table provides summary information about our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015:

  Three Months Ended March 31,  Increase  Percentage 
  2016  2015  (Decrease)  Change 
Rental revenue and reimbursements $2,708,000  $4,804,000  $(2,096,000)  (43.6)%
Operating and maintenance expenses  (937,000)  (1,775,000)  (838,000)  (47.2)%
General and administrative expenses  (396,000)  (766,000)  (370,000)  (48.3)%
Depreciation and amortization expenses  (870,000)  (1,868,000)  (998,000)  (53.4)%
Transaction expense  (4,000)  -   4,000   100.0%
Interest expense  (600,000)  (1,694,000)  (1,094,000)  (64.6)%
Operating loss  (99,000)  (1,299,000)  (1,200,000)  (92.4)%
Other income, net  34,000   4,421,000   (4,387,000)  (99.2)%
Net income (loss) $(65,000) $3,122,000  $3,187,000   (102.1)%

(amounts in thousands):

 Three Months Ended March 31,    
 2017 2016 $ Change % Change
Rental revenue and reimbursements$2,640
 $2,708
 $(68) (2.5)%
Operating and maintenance expenses946
 945
 1
 0.1 %
General and administrative expenses495
 482
 13
 2.7 %
Depreciation and amortization expenses962
 870
 92
 10.6 %
Transaction expense82
 4
 78
 1,950.0 %
Interest expense575
 600
 (25) (4.2)%
Operating loss(420) (193) (227) 117.6 %
Other income, net6,618
 34
 6,584
 19,364.7 %
Income taxes(19) 94
 (113) (120.2)%
Net income (loss)$6,179
 $(65) $6,244
 (9,606.2)%
Our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016,2017, are not necessarily indicative of those expected in future periods.

Revenue

The decrease in revenue during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily due to the sale of Aurora Commons, Constitution Trail,Bloomingdale Hills in April 2016 and Osceola VillagePinehurst Square East in March 2015,January of 2017, partially offset by revenue from the acquisitions of 8 Octavia, 400 Grove, Fulton Shops, 450 Hayes in 2016, and Northgate Plaza, Moreno Marketplace388 Fulton and Summit Point in October 2015. The saleSilver Lake during the first quarter of the three properties in March 2015 was completed in connection with the formation of the SGO Joint Venture (as defined in Note 1. “Organization and Business” and further described in Note 4. “Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures” to the condensed consolidated financial statements contained within this Quarterly Report on From 10-Q).

2017.

Operating and maintenance expenses

The decrease in operating

Operating and maintenance expenses was primarily attributedremained relatively flat during the three months ended March 31, 2017, when compared to the sale of Aurora Commons, Constitution Trail, and Osceola Villagesame period in March 2015, and the sales of Northgate Plaza, Moreno Marketplace and Summit Point in October 2015.

32
2016.


General and administrative expenses

The decreaseslight increase in general and administrative expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily due to lowerincreased asset management fees as a result of property acquisitions in 2016 due to the sale of Aurora Commons, Constitution Trail, and Osceola Village in March 2015 and the salesfirst quarter of Northgate Plaza, Moreno Marketplace2017, partially offset by dispositions of Bloomingdale Hills in April 2016 and Summit PointPinehurst Square East in October 2015, and a decrease in legal expenses with the resolution of the class action lawsuit in 2015.

January 2017.

Depreciation and amortization expenses

The decreaseincrease in depreciation and amortization expenses during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016 was attributeddue to acquisitions of new properties during 2016 and the first quarter of 2017, partially offset by the sale of Aurora Commons, Constitution Trail, and Osceola VillagePinehurst Square East in March 2015,January of 2017, and the salesclassification of Northgate Plaza, MorenoWoodland West Marketplace and Summit Pointas held for sale during the first quarter of 2017.
Transaction expense
The increase in October 2015.

Transaction expense

Transaction expense representstransaction fees during the three months ended March 31, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily due to the expensing of third-party consulting fees related to the exploration of a potential equity transaction, as well as the acquisition fees forwe incurred as a result of our additional investment in the SGO MN Joint Venture, as described in Note 4. “Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures” to our consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

purchase of 450 Hayes.

Interest expense

The decrease in interest expense during the three months ended March 31, 2017, compared to the same period in 2016 was primarily due to the loan pay-offspay-off using the proceeds from the salessale of Aurora Commons, Constitution Trail, and Osceola VillageBloomingdale Hills in March 2015, and the sales of Northgate Plaza, Moreno Marketplace and Summit Point in October 2015.

 Other income

April 2016.

Other income, of $4,421,000 fornet
Other income, net increased during the periodthree months ended March 31, 2015,2017, compared to the same period in 2016 primarily consisteddue to the gain of approximately $6.1 million from the sale of Pinehurst Square East in January 2017, as well as the recognition of deferred gain resulting from the first quarter of 2017 sale by the SGO Joint Venture of propertiesAurora Commons.
Income taxes
We have elected to treat one of our subsidiaries as a taxable REIT subsidiary (“TRS”). In general, a TRS may engage in March 2015. The $34,000 in otherany real estate business and certain non-real estate businesses, subject to certain limitations under the Internal Revenue Code. A TRS is subject to federal and state income fortaxes. For the periodthree months ended March 31, 2016, income taxes primarily representsincluded the equityreversal of an over accrual of estimated alternative minimum state/federal taxes, which was accrued and included in lossesexpenses as of unconsolidated joint ventures.

December 31, 2015. The over accrual was determined to be immaterial and was the result of finalizing, in 2016, the calculation of taxes owed for 2015.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Since our inception, our principal demand for funds has been for the acquisition of real estate, the payment of operating expenses and interest on our outstanding indebtedness, the payment of distributions to our stockholders and investments in unconsolidated joint ventures and development properties. On February 7, 2013, we ceased offering shares of our common stock in our primary offering and under our DRIP.distribution reinvestment plan. As a result of the termination of our initial public offering, offering proceeds from the sale of our securities are not currently available to fund our cash needs. We have used and expect to continue to use debt financing, net sales proceeds and cash flow from operations to fund our cash needs.

During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we utilized the net proceeds from the fourth quarter 2015 disposition of our properties (remaining after paydown of debt) to invest in the Gelson’s Joint Venture and the Wilshire Joint Venture.

As of March 31, 2016,2017, our cash and cash equivalents were $3,414,000approximately $3.0 million and our restricted cash (funds held by the lenders for property taxes, insurance, tenant improvements, leasing commissions, capital expenditures, rollover reserves and other financing needs) was $6,025,000.approximately $3.9 million. For properties with such lender reserves, we may draw upon such reserves to fund the specific needs for which the funds were established.

Our aggregate borrowings, secured and unsecured, are reviewed by our board of directors at least quarterly. Under our Articles of Amendment and Restatement, as amended, which we refer to as our “charter,” we are prohibited from borrowing in excess of 300% of the value of our net assets. Net assets for purposes of this calculation is defined to be our total assets (other than intangibles), valued at cost prior to deducting depreciation, reserves for bad debts and other non-cash reserves, less total liabilities. The preceding calculation is generally expected to approximate 75% of the aggregate cost of our assets before non-cash reserves and depreciation. However, we may temporarily borrow in excess of these amounts if such excess is approved by a majority of the independent directors and disclosed to stockholders in our next quarterly report, along with an explanation for such excess. As of March 31, 20162017 and December 31, 2015,2016, our borrowings were approximately 111.7%108.8% and 65.3%105.2%, respectively, of the carrying value of our net assets.

33


The following table summarizes, for the periods indicated, selected items in our Condensed Consolidated Statementscondensed consolidated statements of Cash Flows:

  Three Months Ended March 31,  Increase 
  2016  2015  (Decrease) 
Net cash provided by (used in):            
Operating activities $1,745,000  $(688,000) $2,433,000 
Investing activities  (30,528,000)  40,954,000   (71,482,000)
Financing activities  23,404,000   (39,512,000)  62,916,000 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $(5,379,000) $754,000     

cash flows (amounts in thousands):

 
Three Months Ended
March 31,
  
 2017 2016 $ Change
Net cash provided by (used in):     
Operating activities$1,996
 $1,414
 $582
Investing activities949
 (30,197) 31,146
Financing activities(3,045) 23,404
 (26,449)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents$(100) $(5,379)  
Cash Flows from Operating Activities

The increase in net cash provided byflows from operating activities was primarily due to changes in operating asset and liability balances of $2,100,000 involving collection of tenant receivables and disbursement by lendersa release of restricted cash.

cash outstanding at December 31, 2016.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

The increasechange in net cash used inflows from investing activities was primarily due to the net proceeds from the disposition of Pinehurst Square East of approximately $18.5 million, partially offset by our investmentsaggregate $17.8 million acquisition of 388 Fulton and Silver Lake in the Wilshire and Gelson’s Joint Ventures, consisting of land and building under development and development costs, totaling $27,280,000January 2017. Cash flows from investing activities during the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to net proceedsconsisted of $53,066,000our aggregate $26.9 million investments in the three months ended March 31, 2015, before the pay down of debt, from the sale of Aurora Commons, Constitution trailWilshire and Osceola Village.

Gelson's Joint Ventures.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

The increasechange in net cash provided byflows from financing activities was primarily due to loan proceeds during the three months ended March 31, 2016, totaling $25,200,0002017, was primarily due to an increase in pay down of debt of approximately $27.9 million in connection with our investments in the Wilshirepay down of a portion of the KeyBank credit facility as a result of the disposition of Pinehurst Square East and Gelson’s Joint Ventures, comparedthe pay down of the debt related to the paydown of debt in the amount of $36,370,000 in the three months ended March 31, 2015 resulting from the sales of Aurora Commons, Constitution Trail and Osceola Village.

Woodland West Marketplace.

Short-term Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal short-term demand for funds is for the payment of operating expenses, the payment of principal and interest on our outstanding indebtedness and distributions. To date, our cash needs for operations have been covered from cash provided by property operations, the sales of properties and the sale of shares of our common stock. Due to the termination of our initial public offering on February 7, 2013, we may fund our short-term operating cash needs from operations, from the sales of properties and from debt.

Long-term Liquidity and Capital Resources

On a long-term basis, our principal demand for funds will be for real estate and real estate-related investments and the payment of acquisition-related expenses, operating expenses, distributions to stockholders, future redemptions of shares and interest and principal payments on current and future indebtedness. Generally, we intend to meet cash needs for items other than acquisitions and acquisition-related expenses from our cash flow from operations, debt and sales of properties. Until the termination of our initial public offering on February 7, 2013, our cash needs for acquisitions were satisfied from the net proceeds of the public offering and from debt financings. On a long-term basis, we expect that substantially all cash generated from operations will be used to pay distributions to our stockholders after satisfying our operating expenses including interest and principal payments. We may consider future public offerings or private placements of equity. SeeRefer to Note 8. “Notes Payable”Payable, Net” to our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for additional information on the maturity dates and terms of our outstanding indebtedness.

34

Recent Financing Transactions

KeyBank Credit Facility

KeyBank Credit Facility
During the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, the following transactions occurred under our KeyBank credit facility:
On January 4, 2017, we drew $4.0 million and used the proceeds to acquire 388 Fulton.

On January 6, 2017, we consummated the disposition of Pinehurst Square East, located in Bismarck, North Dakota, for a sales price of approximately $19.2 million in cash, $18.4 million of which was used to pay down the KeyBank credit facility.
On January 11, 2017, we drew $11.0 million and used the proceeds to acquire Silver Lake.
On January 27, 2017, we drew $1.0 million and used the proceeds for working capital.
On February 28, 2017, we drew $9.8 million and used the proceeds to pay off the mortgage loan related to Woodland West Marketplace.
On February 28, 2017, we drew $0.6 million and used the proceeds to pay certain costs for the refinancing of the KeyBank credit facility.
On March 29, 2017, we drew $1.0 million and used the proceeds for working capital.
On March 7, 2016, we drew $6.0 million under the Amended and Restated Credit Facility and used the proceeds to invest in the Wilshire Joint Venture.

Mortgage Loans Secured by Properties Under Development

In connection with our investment in the Wilshire Joint Venture and the acquisition of the Wilshire Property, the Company haswe have consolidated borrowings of $8,500,000$8.5 million (the “Wilshire Loan”) from Buchanan Mortgage Holdings, LLC (as the lender) and 3032 Wilshire Investors, LLC (as the borrower). The Wilshire Loan bears interest at a rate of 10.0% per annum, payable monthly, commencing on April 1, 2016. The loan matureswas scheduled to mature on March 7, 2017, with an option for antwo additional six-month period,periods, subject to certain conditions as stated in the loan agreement. All conditions to extensions were met, and on March 7, 2017, we exercised the option to extend the loan for six months. The new maturity date is September 7, 2017. The loan is secured by, among other things, a lien on the Wilshire development project and other collateral as defined in the loan agreement.

In connection with our investment in the Gelson’s Joint Venture and the acquisition of the Gelson’s Property, the Company haswe have consolidated borrowings of $10,700,000$10.7 million (the “Gelson’s Loan”) from Buchanan Mortgage Holdings, LLC (as the lender) and Sunset and Gardner Investors, LLC (as the borrower). The Gelson’s Loan bears interest at a rate of 9.50%9.5% per annum, payable monthly, commencing on April 1, 2016. The loan matureswas scheduled to mature on January 27, 2017, with an option to extend for an additional six-month period, subject to certain conditions as stated in the loan agreement. Those conditions were not met, but we negotiated a six month extension of the term on January 27, 2017. The new maturity date is July 27, 2017. The loan is secured by, among other things, a lien on the Gelson’s development project and other joint venture collateral as defined in the loan agreement.

Interim Financial Information

The financial information as of and for the period ended March 31, 2016,2017, included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is unaudited, but includes all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) that, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2016.2017. These interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements do not include all disclosures required by GAAP for complete consolidated financial statements. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year; and such results may be less favorable. Our accompanying interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in our 20152016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Guidelines on Total Operating Expenses

We reimburse our Advisor for some expenses paid or incurred by our Advisor in connection with the services provided to us, except that we will not reimburse our Advisor for any amount by which our total operating expenses at the end of the four preceding fiscal quarters exceed the greater of (1) 2% of our average invested assets, as defined in our charter; and (2) 25% of our net income, as defined in our charter, or the “2%/25% Guidelines” unless a majority of our independent directors determines that such excess expenses are justified based on unusual and non-recurring factors. For the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, our total operating expenses did not exceed the 2%/25% Guidelines.

Inflation

The majority of our leases at our properties contain inflation protection provisions applicable to reimbursement billings for common area maintenance charges, real estate tax and insurance reimbursements on a per square foot basis, or in some cases, annual reimbursement of operating expenses above a certain per square foot allowance. We expect to include similar provisions in our future tenant leases designed to protect us from the impact of inflation. Due to the generally long-term nature of these


leases, annual rent increases, as well as rents received from acquired leases, may not be sufficient to cover inflation and rent may be below market rates.

REIT Compliance

To qualify as a REIT for tax purposes, we are required to annually distribute at least 90% of our REIT taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, to our stockholders. We must also meet certain asset and income tests, as well as other requirements. If we fail to qualify as a REIT in any taxable year, we will be subject to federal income tax (including any applicable alternative minimum tax) on our taxable income at regular corporate rates and generally will not be permitted to qualify for treatment as a REIT for federal income tax purposes for the four taxable years following the year during which our REIT qualification is lost unless the IRS grants us relief under certain statutory provisions. Such an event could materially adversely affect our net income and net cash available for distribution to our stockholders. In 2015, we made the Special Distribution to stockholders to preserve our REIT status based on underreporting of federal taxable income in 2011.

35

Quarterly Distributions

In

As set forth above, in order to qualify as a REIT, we are required to distribute at least 90% of our annual REIT taxable income, subject to certain adjustments, to our stockholders.

Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Credit Facility,Key Bank credit facility, we may pay distributions to our stockholders so long as the total amount paid does not exceed certain thresholds specified in the Amended and Restated Credit FacilityKey Bank credit facility; provided, however, that we are not restricted from making any distributions necessary in order to maintain our status as a REIT. Our board of directors will continue to evaluate the amount of future quarterly distributions based on our operational cash needs.

Some or all of our distributions have been paid, and in the future may continue to be paid, from sources other than cash flows from operations.

The following tables set forth the quarterly distributions declared to our common stockholders and common unit holders for the year ended December 31, 2015. Distributions to our common stockholders and common unit holders for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016 were declared subsequent to March 31, 2016.

  Distribution
Record
Date
 Distribution
Payable
Date
 Distribution Per
Share of
Common Stock /
Common Unit
  Total Common
Stockholders
Distribution
  Total Common
Unit Holders
Distribution
  Total
Distribution
 
First Quarter 2015 3/31/2015 4/30/2015 $0.06  $658,000  $26,000  $684,000 
Second Quarter 2015 6/30/2015 7/30/2015 $0.06   654,000   26,000   680,000 
Third Quarter 2015 9/30/2015 10/30/2015 $0.06   654,000   26,000   680,000 
Fourth Quarter 2015 12/31/2015 1/30/2016 $0.06   661,000   25,000   686,000 
Total         $2,627,000  $103,000  $2,730,000 

(amounts in thousands, except per share amounts):

 
Distribution Record
Date
 
Distribution
Payable
Date
 
Distribution Per Share of Common Stock /
Common Unit
 
Total Common
Stockholders
Distribution
 
Total Common
Unit Holders
Distribution
 
Total
Distribution
First Quarter 20173/31/2017 4/28/2017 $0.06
 $655
 $25
 $680
 
Distribution Record
Date
 
Distribution
Payable
Date
 
Distribution Per Share of Common Stock /
Common Unit
 
Total Common
Stockholders
Distribution
 
Total Common
Unit Holders
Distribution
 
Total
Distribution
First Quarter 20163/31/2016 4/29/2016 $0.06
 $660
 $26
 $686
Second Quarter 20167/7/2016 7/29/2016 0.06
 661
 25
 686
Third Quarter 20169/30/2016 10/31/2016 0.06
 659
 25
 684
Fourth Quarter 201612/30/2016 1/31/2017 0.06
 656
 25
 681
Total      $2,636
 $101
 $2,737
Funds From Operations

Funds from operations (“FFO”) is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure of a real estate company’s operating performance. The National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or “NAREIT”, an industry trade group, has promulgated this supplemental performance measure and defines FFO as net income, computed in accordance with GAAP, plus real estate related depreciation and amortization and excluding extraordinary items and gains and losses on the sale of real estate, and after adjustments for unconsolidated joint ventures (adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures are calculated to reflect FFO.) It is important to note that not only is FFO not equivalent to our net income or loss as determined under GAAP, it also does not represent cash flows from operating activities in accordance with GAAP.  FFO should not be considered an alternative to net income as inan indication of our performance, nor is FFO necessarily indicative of cash flow as a measure of liquidity or our ability to fund cash needs, including the payment of distributions.



We consider FFO to be a meaningful, additional measure of operating performance and one that is an appropriate supplemental disclosure for an equity REIT due to its widespread acceptance and use within the REIT and analyst communities. Comparison of our presentation of FFO to similarly titled measures for other REITs may not necessarily be meaningful due to possible differences in the application of the NAREIT definition used by such REITs.

36

Our calculation of FFO attributable to common shares and Common Units and the reconciliation of net income (loss) to FFO is as follows:

FFO 2016  2015 
Net income (loss)(1) $(65,000) $3,122,000 
Adjustments (2):        
Net income related to membership interest  -   (93,000)
Gain on disposal of assets  (9,000)  (4,685,000)
Adjustment to reflect FFO of unconsolidated joint ventures  204,000   18,000 
Depreciation of real estate  644,000   1,345,000 
Amortization of in-place leases and other intangibles  226,000   504,000 
FFO attributable to common shares and Common Units $1,000,000  $211,000 
         
FFO per share/Common Unit $0.09  $0.02 
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic  11,469,085   11,401,610 

follows (amounts in thousands, except shares and per share amounts):
  Three Months Ended
March 31,
FFO 2017 2016
Net income (loss) (1)
 $6,179
 $(65)
Adjustments:    
Gain on disposal of assets (6,586) (9)
Adjustment to reflect FFO of unconsolidated joint ventures 80
 204
Depreciation of real estate 607
 644
Amortization of in-place leases and other intangibles 355
 226
FFO attributable to common shares and Common Units $635
 $1,000
     
FFO per share and Common Unit $0.06
 $0.09
     
Weighted average common shares and units outstanding 11,359,759
 11,469,085
(1)Our Common Unitscommon units have the right to convert a unit into common stock for a one-to-one conversion. Therefore, we are including the related non-controlling interest income/loss attributable to Common Unitscommon units in the computation of FFO and including the Common Unitscommon units together with weighted average shares outstanding for the computation of FFO per share and Common Unit.common unit.
(2)Where applicable, adjustments exclude amounts attributable to membership interest.

Related Party Transactions and Agreements

We are currently party to the Advisory Agreement, pursuant to which the Advisor manages our business in exchange for specified fees paid for services related to the investment of funds in real estate and real estate-related investments, management of our investments and for other services. Refer to Note 12. “Related Party Transactions” to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of the Advisory Agreement and other related party transactions, agreements and fees.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Our off-balance sheet arrangements consist primarily of our investments in joint ventures and are described in Note 4. “Investments in Unconsolidated Joint Ventures” in the notes to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our joint ventures typically fund their cash needs through secured debt financings obtained by and in the name of the joint venture entity. The joint ventures’ debts are secured by a first mortgage, are without recourse to the joint venture partners, and do not represent a liability of the partners other than carve-out guarantees for certain matters such as environmental conditions, misuse of funds and material misrepresentations. As of March 31, 2016,2017, we have provided carve-out guarantees in connection with our two unconsolidated joint ventures; in connection with those carve-out guarantees we have certain rights of recovery from our joint venture partners.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our condensed consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and in conjunction with the rules and regulations of the SEC. The preparation of our financial statements requires significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates about matters that are inherently uncertain. These judgments affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and our disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. With different estimates or assumptions, materially different amounts could be reported in our financial statements. Additionally, other companies may utilize different estimates that may impact the comparability of our results of operations to those of companies in similar businesses. AOther than the critical accounting policy discussed below, a discussion of theadditional accounting policies that management considers critical in that they involve significant management judgments, assumptions and estimates is included in our 20152016 Annual Report on Form 10-K.



Investments in Real Estate
In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805): Clarifying the Definition of a Business (“ASU 2017-01”) that clarifies the framework for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities meets the definition of a business. The revised framework establishes a screen for determining whether an integrated set of assets and activities is a business and narrows the definition of a business, which is expected to result in fewer transactions being accounted for as business combinations. Acquisitions of integrated sets of assets and activities that do not meet the definition of a business are accounted for as asset acquisitions. 
We elected to early adopt ASU 2017-01 for the reporting period beginning January 1, 2017. As a result of adopting ASU 2017-01, our acquisitions of properties beginning January 1, 2017 were evaluated under the new guidance. The acquisitions occurring during 2017 were determined to be asset acquisitions, as they did not meet the definition of a business.
Evaluation of business combination or asset acquisition:
We evaluate each acquisition of real estate to determine if the integrated set of assets and activities acquired meet the definition of a business and need to be accounted for as a business combination. If either of the following criteria is met, the integrated set of assets and activities acquired would not qualify as a business:
•    Substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired is concentrated in either a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets; or
•    The integrated set of assets and activities is lacking, at a minimum, an input and a substantive process that together significantly contribute to the ability to create outputs (i.e. revenue generated before and after the transaction).
An acquired process is considered substantive if:
•    The process includes an organized workforce (or includes an acquired contract that provides access to an organized workforce), that is skilled, knowledgeable, and experienced in performing the process;
•    The process cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort, or delay; or
•    The process is considered unique or scarce.
Generally, we expect that acquisitions of real estate will not meet the revised definition of a business because substantially all of the fair value is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or group of similar identifiable assets (i.e. land, buildings, and related intangible assets), or because the acquisition does not include a substantive process in the form of an acquired workforce or an acquired contract that cannot be replaced without significant cost, effort or delay.
In asset acquisitions, the purchase consideration, including acquisition costs, is allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed on a relative fair value basis. As a result, asset acquisitions do not result in the recognition of goodwill or a bargain purchase gain.
Depreciation and amortization is computed using a straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets as follows:
 37Years
Buildings and improvements5 - 30 years
Tenant improvements1 - 36 years

Tenant improvement costs recorded as capital assets are depreciated over the tenant’s remaining lease term, which we determined approximates the useful life of the improvement. Expenditures for ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed to operations as incurred. Significant renovations and improvements that improve or extend the useful lives of assets are capitalized. Acquisition costs related to asset acquisitions are capitalized in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

For acquisitions of real estate prior to the adoption of ASU 2017-01, which were generally accounted for as business combinations, we recognized the assets acquired (including the intangible value of acquired above- or below-market leases, acquired in-place leases and other intangible assets or liabilities) at fair value as of the acquisition date. Acquisition costs related to the business combinations were expensed as incurred.


Subsequent Events

Quarterly

Distributions

On April 6, 2016,28, 2017, we declaredpaid a first quarter distribution in the amount of $0.06 per share/unit to common stockholders and holders of common units of record as of March 31, 2016,2017, totaling $686,000. Theapproximately $0.7 million.
On May 10, 2017, our board of directors approved a second quarter distribution was paid on April 29, 2016.

in the amount of $0.06 per share/unit to common stockholders and holders of common units of record as of June 30, 2017. We expect to pay this distribution by the end of July 2017.

Sale of Held for Sale Property and Payment of Mortgage Loan

Properties

On April 4, 2016,17, 2017, we consummated the disposition of Bloomingdale Hills forWoodland West Marketplace at a sales price of approximately $9.2 million in cash,$14.6 million. We used the net proceeds from the sale of Woodland West Marketplace to repay a portion of which was used to pay off the related $5.3 million mortgage loan and $3 million of which was used to pay downoutstanding balance on the line of credit.

Entry into a Material Definitive Agreement

On May 4, 2016, we, through an indirect subsidiary, entered into three separate purchase agreements to acquire three retail properties located in San Francisco, California (the “San Francisco Properties”) from each of Octavia Gateway Holdings, LLC, Grove Street Hayes Valley, LLC and Hayes Street Hayes Valley LLC, each a Delaware limited liability company and each a subsidiary of DDG Partners LLC. The sellers are not affiliated with us or our external advisor. The San Francisco Properties encompass an aggregate of six retail condominiums with an aggregate of 9,121 square feet of retail space. The aggregate purchase price of the San Francisco Properties is approximately $13.7 million plus closing costs.

Pursuant to the agreements, we made aggregate earnest money deposits of $425,000 to the sellers on May 6, 2016. There can be no assurance that we will complete the acquisition of any or all of the San Francisco Properties. In some circumstances, if we fail to complete the acquisitions, we may forfeit up to $425,000 of earnest money.

KeyBank Credit Facility.
ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

ITEM 3.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Omitted as permitted under rules applicable to smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

ITEM 4.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon, and as of the date of, the evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported as and when required. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file and submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and our chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first quarter ended March 31, 20162017, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

38


PART II.OTHER INFORMATION

PART II
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
None.

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
Omitted as permitted under rules applicable to smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 2.UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
During the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we did not issue any equity securities that were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

Share Redemption Program

On April 1, 2015, our board of directors approved the reinstatement of the share redemption program (which had been suspended since January 15, 2013) and adopted an Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program (the “Amended and Restated SRP”“SRP”). Under the Amended and Restated SRP, only shares submitted for repurchase in connection with the death or “qualifying disability” (as defined in the Amended and Restated SRP) of a stockholder are eligible for repurchase by us. The number of shares to be redeemed is limited to the lesser of (i) a total of $2,000,000$2.0 million for redemptions sought upon a stockholder’s death and a total of $1,000,000$1.0 million for redemptions sought upon a stockholder’s qualifying disability, and (ii) 5% of the weighted average of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding during the prior calendar year. Share repurchases pursuant to the share redemption programSRP are made at our sole discretion. We reserve the right to reject any redemption request for any reason or no reason or to amend or terminate the share redemption program at any time subject to the notice requirements in the Amended and Restated SRP.

The redemption price for shares that are redeemed is 100% of our most recent estimated net asset value per share as of the applicable redemption date. A redemption request must be made within one year after the stockholder’s death or disability, unless such death or disability occurred between January 15, 2013 and April 1, 2015, when the share redemption program was suspended. Any stockholder whoseRedemption requests due to the death or disability of a Company stockholder that occurred during thissuch time period, must submit their redemption request within one year after the adoption of the Amended and Restated SRP.

were required to be submitted on or before April 1, 2016.

The Amended and Restated SRP provides that any request to redeem less than $5,000$5 thousand worth of shares will be treated as a request to redeem all of the stockholder’s shares. If we cannot honor all redemption requests received in a given quarter, all requests, including death and disability redemptions, will be honored on a pro rata basis. If we do not completely satisfy a redemption request in one quarter, we will treat the unsatisfied portion as a request for redemption in the next quarter when funds are available for redemption, unless the request is withdrawn. We may increase or decrease the amount of funding available for redemptions under the Amended and Restated SRP on ten business days’ notice to stockholders. Shares submitted for redemption during any quarter will be redeemed on the penultimate business day of such quarter. The record date for quarterly distributions has historically been and is expected to continue to be the last business day of each quarter; therefore, shares that are redeemed during any quarter are expected to be redeemed prior to the record date and thus would not be eligible to receive the distribution declared for such quarter.

The other material terms of the Amended and Restated SRP are consistent with the terms of the share redemption program that was in effect immediately prior to January 15, 2013.

On August 7, 2015,October 5, 2016, our board of directors approved, the amendment and restatementpursuant to Section 3(a) of the Amended and Restated SRP, (the “Second Amended and Restated SRP” and, together with the Amended and Restated SRP, the “SRP”). Under the Second Amended and Restated SRP, the redemption date with respect to third quarter 2015 redemptions was November 10, 2015 or the next practicable date as our Chief Executive Officer determined so that redemptions with respect to the third quarteran additional $0.5 million of 2015 were delayed until after the payment datefunds available for the Special Distribution. With this revision, stockholders who were to have 100% of their shares redeemed were not left holding a small number of shares from the Special Distribution after the date of the redemption of their shares. The other material terms of the Second Amended and Restated SRP are consistentshares in connection with the termsdeath of the Amended and Restated SRP.

39
a stockholder. 


During the three months ended March 31, 2016,2017, we redeemed shares as follows:

        Total Number of Shares    
        Purchased as Part of a  Approximate Dollar Value of 
  Total Number of  Average Price  Publicly Announced Plan  Shares That May Yet be 
Period Shares Redeemed(1)  Paid per Share  or Program(2)  Redeemed Under the Program(3) 
January 2016  -  $-   -  $1,617,866 
February 2016  -  $-   -  $1,617,866 
March 2016  30,721  $6.56   30,721  $1,416,420 
Total  30,721       30,721     

Period 
Total Number of
Shares Redeemed (1)
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
 
Total Number of Shares
Purchased as Part of a
Publicly Announced Plan
or Program 
 
Approximate Dollar Value of
Shares That May Yet be
Redeemed Under the Program (2)
January 2017 
 $
 
 $915,158
February 2017 
 
 
 915,158
March 2017 31,875
 6.36
 31,875
 712,431
Total 31,875
  
 31,875
  
(1)All of our purchases of equity securities during the three months ended March 31, 2016,2017, were made pursuant to the SRP.
(2)We previously announced a share redemption program in connection with the Offering. The program, was suspended in January 2013 and reinstated by the board of directors in April 2015. For additional information regarding the SRP, see the disclosure above.
(3)(2)We currently limit the dollar value and number of shares that may yet be repurchased under the SRP as described above.

SRP as described above.

Cumulatively, through March 31, 2017, the Company has redeemed 507,069 shares for $3.9 million.
ITEM 3.DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicable.



ITEM 5.OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 5.OTHER INFORMATION
As of the three months ended March 31, 2016,2017, all items required to be disclosed under Form 8-K were reported under Form 8-K.



ITEM 6.EXHIBITS

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS
The exhibits listed on the Exhibit Index (following the signatures section of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q) are included herewith, or incorporated herein by reference.

40


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized on May 13, 2016.

11, 2017.
 Strategic Realty Trust, Inc.
  
 By:/s/ Andrew Batinovich
  Andrew Batinovich
  

Chief Executive Officer, Corporate Secretary and Director

(Principal Executive Officer)

 By:/s/ Terri Garnick
  Terri Garnick
  

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

41


EXHIBIT INDEX

The following exhibits are included, or incorporated by reference, in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the three months ended March 31, 20162017 (and are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K).

Exhibit No.
 Incorporated by Reference
Exhibit No.Description
Filed
Herewith
Form/File No.Filing Date
3.1.1 Articles of Amendment and Restatement of TNP Strategic Retail Trust, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Pre-Effective Amendment
S-11/
No. 5 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-11 (No. 333-154975))333-154975
7/10/2009
3.1.2 Articles of Amendment, dated August 22, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on August 26, 2013)8/26/2013
3.1.3 Articles Supplementary, dated November 1, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 4, 2013)11/4/2013
3.1.4 Articles Supplementary, dated January 22, 2014 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2014)1/28/2014
3.2 Third Amended and Restated Bylaws of Strategic Realty Trust, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 28, 2014)1/28/2014
10.1 OperatingThe Purchase and Sale Agreement by and among the Members and Manager ofbetween Sunset & GardnerTriangle Investors, LLC and Strategic Realty Operating Partnership, LP, dated January 7,November 21, 2016.X
10.2 LoanThe Purchase and Sale Agreement by and between Buchanan MortgageTNP SRT Woodland West Holdings LLC and Sunset & Gardner Investors LLC,ORDA CORP., a Texas corporation, dated January 26, 2016.31, 2017.X
10.3Second Amended and Restated Revolving Credit Agreement among Strategic Realty Operating Partnership, L.P., SRT Secured Holdings, LLC, KeyBank National Association, as administrative agent, and KeyBanc Capital Markets, LLC, as sole lead bookrunner and sole lead arranger, dated February 15, 2017X
31.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002X
31.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002X
32.1 Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002X
32.2 Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002X
99.1 Strategic Realty Trust, Inc. Amended and Restated Share Redemption Program Adopted April 1, 2015 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form August 26, 20168-K filed on April 9, 2015)8/30/2016
101.INS XBRL Instance DocumentX
101.SCH XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentX
101.CAL XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase DocumentX
101.DEF XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase DocumentX
101.LAB XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase DocumentX
101.PRE XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase DocumentX



41