UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark One)

 

xQuarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the Quarterly Period EndedJune 30, 2016March 31, 2017

OR

¨Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

For the Transition Period from ___________to__________

 

Commission file number0-26850

 

 First Defiance Financial Corp. 
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Ohio 34-1803915
(State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization) Identification Number)

601 Clinton Street, Defiance, Ohio 43512
(Address of principal executive office) (Zip Code)

 

Registrant's telephone number, including area code:(419) 782-5015

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YesxNo¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YesxNo¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

Large accelerated filer¨Accelerated filerx
Non-accelerated filer¨Smaller reporting company¨

Emerging growth company¨

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes¨Nox

 

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practical date. Common Stock, $.01 Par Value – 8,976,35010,145,890 shares outstanding at July 31, 2016.April 28, 2017.

 

 

 

 

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.

 

INDEX

 

  Page Number
PART I.-FINANCIAL INFORMATION 
   
Item 1.Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited): 
 
Consolidated Condensed Statements of Financial Condition – June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 201520162
   
 Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income - Three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 20154
   
 Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income – Three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 20155
   
 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity – SixThree months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015

6
   
 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows - SixThree months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 20157

7
   
 Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements8
   
Item 2.Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations4852
   
Item 3.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk6973
   
Item 4.Controls and Procedures7175
   
PART II-OTHER INFORMATION: 
   
Item 1.Legal Proceedings7276
   
Item 1A.Risk Factors7276
   
Item 2.Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds7276
   
Item 3.Defaults upon Senior Securities7276
   
Item 4.Mine Safety Disclosures7276
   
Item 5.Other Information7377
   
Item 6.Exhibits7377
   
Signatures7478

 

 1 

 

 

PART I-FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Financial Condition

(UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in Thousands, except share and per share data)

  

 

 

June 30,

2016

  December 31,
2015
  March 31,
2017
  December 31,
2016
 
        
Assets                
Cash and cash equivalents:                
Cash and amounts due from depository institutions $46,546  $38,769  $53,998  $53,003 
Federal funds sold  84,000   41,000   116,000   46,000 
  130,546   79,769   169,998   99,003 
Securities:                
Available-for-sale, carried at fair value  227,974   236,435   260,601   250,992 
Held-to-maturity, carried at amortized cost (fair value $199 and $245 at June 30, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively)  198   243 
        
Held-to-maturity, carried at amortized cost (fair value $773 and $187 at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)  771   184 
  228,172   236,678   261,372   251,176 
Loans held for sale  13,142   5,523   7,955   9,607 
Loans receivable, net of allowance of $25,948 at June 30, 2016 and $25,382 at December 31, 2015, respectively  1,835,455   1,776,835 
Loans receivable, net of allowance of $25,749 at March 31, 2017 and $25,884 at December 31, 2016, respectively  2,212,257   1,914,603 
Mortgage servicing rights  9,672   9,595 
Accrued interest receivable  6,421   6,171   8,872   6,760 
Federal Home Loan Bank stock  13,800   13,801   15,992   13,798 
Bank owned life insurance  52,369   51,908   64,968   52,817 
Premises and equipment  37,571   38,166   42,824   36,958 
Real estate and other assets held for sale  1,079   1,321   705   455 
Goodwill  61,798   61,798   90,768   61,798 
Core deposit and other intangibles  1,567   1,871   6,004   1,336 
Mortgage servicing rights  9,136   9,248 
Deferred Taxes  1,219   2,212 
Other assets  18,543   14,587   36,091   17,479 
Total assets $2,409,599  $2,297,676  $2,928,697  $2,477,597 

 

(continued)

 2 

 

 

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.

 

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Financial Condition

(UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in Thousands, except share and per share data)

  

 

 

June 30,

2016

  December 31,
2015
  March 31,
2017
  December 31,
2016
 
        
Liabilities and stockholders’ equity                
Liabilities:                
Deposits $1,920,270  $1,836,137  $2,373,789  $1,981,628 
Advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank  84,425   59,902   105,104   103,943 
Subordinated debentures  36,083   36,083   36,083   36,083 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements  52,989   57,188   24,891   31,816 
Advance payments by borrowers  1,885   2,674   1,840   2,650 
Deferred taxes  1,676   877 
Other liabilities  25,655   24,618   32,799   28,459 
Total liabilities  2,122,983   2,017,479   2,574,506   2,184,579 
                
Stockholders’ equity:                
Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share: 37,000 shares authorized; no shares issued        -   - 
Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share:        
4,963,000 shares authorized; no shares issued      
Common stock, $.01 par value per share:        
25,000,000 shares authorized; 12,720,389 and 12,721,959 shares issued and 8,971,460 and 9,102,831 shares outstanding, respectively  127   127 
Common stock warrant  -   - 
Preferred stock, $.01 par value per share: 4,963,000 shares authorized; no shares issued  -   - 
Common stock, $.01 par value per share: 25,000,000 shares authorized; 12,713,385 and 12,720,347 shares issued and 10,143,052 and 8,983,206 shares outstanding, respectively  127   127 
Additional paid-in capital  125,877   125,734   160,397   126,390 
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax of $2,703 and $1,950, respectively  5,020   3,622 
Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax of $670 and $117, respectively  1,242   215 
Retained earnings  230,132   219,737   243,446   240,592 
Treasury stock, at cost, 3,748,929 and 3,619,128 shares respectively  (74,540)  (69,023)
Treasury stock, at cost, 2,570,333 and 3,737,141 shares respectively  (51,021)  (74,306)
Total stockholders’ equity  286,616   280,197   354,191   293,018 
                
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity $2,409,599  $2,297,676  $2,928,697  $2,477,597 

 

See accompanying notes.notes

 3 

 

 

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income

(UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in Thousands, except share and per share data)

 

  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2016  2015  2016  2015 
Interest Income                
Loans $19,666  $18,139  $38,978  $36,026 
Investment securities:                
Taxable  781   918   1,624   1,832 
Non-taxable  762   803   1,549   1,581 
Interest-bearing deposits  134   41   183   80 
FHLB stock dividends  137   136   276   275 
Total interest income  21,480   20,037   42,610   39,794 
Interest Expense                
Deposits  1,545   1,312   2,978   2,584 
FHLB advances and other  321   173   618   283 
Subordinated debentures  182   150   357   297 
Notes payable  36   37   73   75 
Total interest expense  2,084   1,672   4,026   3,239 
Net interest income  19,396   18,365   38,584   36,555 
Provision for loan losses  53   -   417   120 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  19,343   18,365   38,167   36,435 
Non-interest Income                
Service fees and other charges  2,799   2,690   5,443   5,219 
Insurance commissions  2,504   2,344   5,640   5,483 
Mortgage banking income  1,764   1,793   3,303   3,568 
Gain on sale of non-mortgage loans  411   197   456   233 
Gain on sale or call of securities  227   -   358   - 
Trust income  409   367   836   725 
Income from Bank Owned Life Insurance  230   212   461   420 
Other non-interest income  231   206   714   443 
Total non-interest income  8,575   7,809   17,211   16,091 
Non-interest Expense                
Compensation and benefits  9,770   9,182   19,955   18,105 
Occupancy  1,828   1,809   3,613   3,573 
FDIC insurance premium  329   319   656   670 
Financial institutions tax  447   411   893   893 
Data processing  1,641   1,599   3,101   3,121 
Amortization of intangibles  147   162   304   379 
Other non-interest expense  3,185   3,314   6,099   6,953 
Total non-interest expense  17,347   16,796   34,621   33,694 
Income before income taxes  10,571   9,378   20,757   18,832 
Federal income taxes  3,307   2,815   6,324   5,668 
Net Income $7,264  $6,563  $14,433  $13,164 
                 
Earnings per common share (Note 6)                
Basic $0.81  $0.71  $1.61  $1.42 
Diluted $0.80  $0.70  $1.59  $1.39 
Dividends declared per share (Note 5) $0.22  $0.20  $0.44  $0.375 
Average common shares outstanding (Note 6)                
Basic  8,968   9,268   8,981   9,251 
Diluted  9,036   9,349   9,050   9,483 

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2017  2016 
Interest Income        
Loans $21,969  $19,312 
Investment securities:        
Taxable  979   843 
Non-taxable  777   787 
Interest-bearing deposits  145   49 
FHLB stock dividends  166   139 
Total interest income  24,036   21,130 
Interest Expense        
Deposits  1,796   1,433 
FHLB advances and other  366   297 
Subordinated debentures  215   175 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements  14   37 
Total interest expense  2,391   1,942 
Net interest income  21,645   19,188 
Provision for loan losses  55   364 
Net interest income after provision for loan losses  21,590   18,824 
Non-interest Income        
Service fees and other charges  2,760   2,644 
Insurance commission income  3,457   3,136 
Mortgage banking income  1,738   1,539 
Gain on sale of non-mortgage loans  -   45 
Gain on sale of securities  -   131 
Trust income  450   427 
Income from Bank Owned Life Insurance  1,823   231 
Other non-interest income  321   483 
Total non-interest income  10,549   8,636 
Non-interest Expense        
Compensation and benefits  14,335   10,185 
Occupancy  1,837   1,785 
FDIC insurance premium  290   327 
Financial institutions tax  480   446 
Data processing  1,939   1,460 
Amortization of intangibles  232   157 
Other non-interest expense  4,029   2,914 
Total non-interest expense  23,142   17,274 
Income before income taxes  8,997   10,186 
Federal income taxes  3,857   3,017 
Net Income $5,140  $7,169 
         
Earnings per common share (Note 6)        
Basic $0.54  $0.80 
Diluted $0.54  $0.79 
Dividends declared per share (Note 5) $0.25  $0.22 
Average common shares outstanding (Note 6)        
Basic  9,441   8,994 
Diluted  9,497   9,064 

 

See accompanying notes.notes

 4 

 

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income

(UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in Thousands)

 

  Three Months Ended  Six Months Ended 
  June 30,  June 30, 
  2016  2015  2016  2015 
Net Income $7,264  $6,563  $14,433  $13,164 
                 
Other comprehensive income (loss):                
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale  1,059   (3,839)  2,509   (2,337)
Reclassification adjustment for security (gains) losses included in net income(1)  (227)  -   (358)  - 
Income tax benefit (expense)  (291)  1,344   (753)  817 
Other comprehensive income (loss)  541   (2,495)  1,398   (1,520)
                 
Comprehensive income $7,805  $4,068  $15,831  $11,644 
  Three Months Ended 
March 31,
 
  2017  2016 
    
Net income $5,140  $7,169 
         
Other comprehensive income:        
Unrealized gains on securities available for sale  1,580   1,450 
Reclassification adjustments for security (gains) losses included in net income(1)  -   (131)
Income tax expense  (553)  (462)
Other comprehensive income  1,027   857 
         
Comprehensive income $6,167  $8,026 

 

(1) Amounts are included in gains on sale or call of securities on the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income. Income tax expense associated with the reclassification adjustments, included in federal income taxes, for the three months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 was $0 and 2015 was $79 and $0,$46, respectively. Income tax expense associated with the reclassification adjustments, included in federal income taxes, for the six months ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 was $125 and $0, respectively.

See accompanying notes.

 

 5 

 

 

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.

Consolidated StatementsStatement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

(UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in Thousands, except share data)

 

                 Accumulated          
     Common     Common  Additional  Other        Total 
  Preferred  Stock  Common  Stock  Paid-In  Comprehensive  Retained  Treasury  Stockholders’ 
  Stock  Shares  Stock  Warrant  Capital  Income  Earnings  Stock  Equity 
                            
Balance at January 1, 2016 $-   9,102,831  $127  $-  $125,734  $3,622  $219,737  $(69,023) $280,197 
Net income                          14,433       14,433 
Other comprehensive income                      1,398           1,398 
Stock option expense                  120               120 
Shares issued under stock option plan, net of 1,570 repurchased and retired      25,350           (23)      (26)  539   490 
Restricted share activity under stock incentive plans      10,405           34       (72)  225   187 
Shares issued direct purchases      620           12           12   24 
Shares repurchased      (167,746)                      (6,293)  (6,293)
Common stock dividends declared                          (3,940)      (3,940)
Balance at June 30, 2016 $-   8,971,460  $127  $-  $125,877  $5,020  $230,132  $(74,540) $286,616 
                                     
Balance at January 1, 2015 $-   9,234,534  $127  $878  $136,266  $4,114  $200,600  $(62,480) $279,505 
Net income                          13,164       13,164 
Other comprehensive loss                      (1,520)          (1,520)
Stock option expense                  59               59 
Warrant repurchase              (878)  (11,101)              (11,979)
Shares issued under stock option plan, net of 12,844 repurchased and retired      62,410           213       (312)  1,360   1,261 
Restricted share activity under stock incentive plans      15,006           (223)      185   270   232 
Shares issued direct purchases      1,090           17           21   38 
Shares repurchased      (37,857)                      (1,264)  (1,264)
Common stock dividends declared                          (3,468)      (3,468)
Balance at June 30, 2015 $-   9,275,183  $127  $-  $125,231  $2,594  $210,169  $(62,093) $276,028 

 

See accompanying notes.

              Accumulated          
     Common     Additional  Other        Total 
  Preferred  Stock  Common  Paid-In  Comprehensive  Retained  Treasury  Stockholders’ 
  Stock  Shares  Stock  Capital  Income  Earnings  Stock  Equity 
                         
Balance at January 1, 2017 $-   8,983,206  $127  $126,390  $215  $240,591  $(74,306) $293,017 
 Net income                      5,140       5,140 
Other comprehensive income                  1,027           1,027 
Stock based compensation expenses              45               45 
Shares issued under stock option plan,  net of 6,962 repurchased and retired      588       22       (39)  151   134 
 Capital stock issuance      1,139,502       33,792           22,740   56,532 
 Restricted share activity under stock incentive plans      19,416       138           387   525 
Shares issued from direct stock sales      340       10           7   17 
Common stock dividends declared                      (2,246)      (2,246)
Balance at March 31, 2017 $-   10,143,052  $127  $160,397  $1,242  $243,446  $(51,021) $354,191 
                                 
                                 
                                 
                                 
Balance at January 1, 2016 $-   9,102,831  $127  $125,734  $3,622  $219,737  $(69,023) $280,197 
 Net income                      7,169       7,169 
Other comprehensive income                  857           857 
Stock based compensation expenses              119               119 
Shares issued under stock option plan,  net of 900 repurchased and retired      16,770       (91)          353   262 
 Restricted share activity under stock incentive plans      9,033       (124)          188   64 
Shares issued from direct stock sales      233       4           5   9 
 Shares repurchased      (167,746)                  (6,293)  (6,293)
Common stock dividends declared                      (1,966)      (1,966)
Balance at March 31, 2016 $-   8,961,121  $127  $125,642  $4,479  $224,940  $(74,770) $280,418 

 

 6 

 

 

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.

Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(UNAUDITED)

(Amounts in Thousands)

 

  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 
  2016  2015 
Operating Activities        
Net income $14,433  $13,164 
Items not requiring (providing) cash        
Provision for loan losses  417   120 
Depreciation  1,665   1,624 
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net of impairment recoveries  870   690 
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets  304   379 
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on loans and deposits  175   231 
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities  411   376 
Loss on write-downs of property, plant and equipment  -   426 
Change in deferred taxes  46   (428)
Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale  101,985   108,174 
Originations of loans held for sale  (107,942)  (111,707)
Gain from sale of loans  (2,876)  (2,764)
Gain from sale or call of securities  (358)  - 
(Gain)/Loss on sale or write-down of real estate and other assets held for sale  (272)  259 
Stock option expense  120   59 
Restricted stock expense  187   232 
Income from bank owned life insurance  (461)  (420)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation  (130)  - 
Changes in:        
Accrued interest receivable  (250)  (167)
Other assets  (4,312)  (1,223)
Other liabilities  1,166   467 
Net cash provided by operating activities  5,178   9,492 
         
Investing Activities        
Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity securities  45   55 
Proceeds from maturities, calls and pay-downs of available-for-sale securities  17,877   15,648 
Proceeds from sale of real estate and other assets held for sale  902   1,690 
Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities  8,515   - 
Proceeds from sale of non-mortgage loans  10,945   501 
Purchases of available-for-sale securities  (15,476)  (16,051)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank stock redemption  1   - 
Purchase of bank-owned life insurance  -   (4,000)
Purchases of premises and equipment, net  (1,028)  (1,214)
Net increase in loans receivable  (70,132)  (59,803)
Net cash used in investing activities  (48,351)  (63,174)
         
Financing Activities        
Net increase in deposits and advance payments by borrowers  83,345   2,760 
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances  (477)  (7,494)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances  25,000   27,000 
Decrease in securities sold under repurchase agreements  (4,199)  (522)
Repayment of warrants  -   (11,979)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  490   1,261 
Proceeds from direct stock sales  24   38 
Cash dividends paid on common stock  (3,940)  (3,468)
Net cash paid for repurchase of common stock  (6,293)  (1,264)
Net cash provided by financing activities  93,950   6,332 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  50,777   (47,350)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  79,769   112,936 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $130,546  $65,586 
         
Supplemental cash flow information:        
Interest paid $3,975  $3,218 
Income taxes paid $5,900  $5,200 
Transfers from loans to real estate and other assets held for sale $431  $872 
Securities purchased but not yet settled $357  $- 

  Three Months Ended 
  March 31, 
  2017  2016 
Operating Activities        
Net income $5,140  $7,169 
Items not requiring (providing) cash        
Provision for loan losses  55   364 
Depreciation  867   818 
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights, net of impairment recoveries  279   332 
Amortization of core deposit and other intangible assets  232   157 
Net amortization of premiums and discounts on loans and deposits  27   88 
Amortization of premiums and discounts on securities  240   193 
Change in deferred taxes  777   264 
Proceeds from the sale of loans held for sale  48,356   40,341 
Originations of loans held for sale  (45,977)  (42,444)
Gain from sale of loans  (1,083)  (1,039)
Gain from sale or call of securities  -   (131)
(Gain) loss on sale / write-down of real estate and other assets held for sale  -   (265)
Stock option expense  45   119 
Restricted stock expense  525   64 
Income from bank owned life insurance  (1,823)  (231)
Excess tax benefit (expense) on stock compensation plans  (162)  (99)
Changes in:        
Accrued interest receivable  (790)  (730)
Other assets  (1,801)  (793)
Other liabilities  3,364   672 
Net cash provided by operating activities  8,271   4,849 
         
Investing Activities        
Proceeds from maturities of held-to-maturity securities  5   8 
Proceeds from maturities, calls and pay-downs of available-for-sale securities  5,960   7,903 
Proceeds from sale of real estate and other assets held for sale  9   884 
Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities  -   5,360 
Proceeds from sale of non-mortgage loans  9,880   2,828 
Purchases of available-for-sale securities  (8,815)  (2,875)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan stock redemption  -   1 
Net cash received in acquisition  25,840   - 
Investment in bank owned life insurance  (20,000)  - 
Purchase of portfolio mortgage loans  (10,133)  - 
Purchases of premises and equipment, net  (1,278)  (562)
Net increase in loans receivable  (12,851)  (26,127)
Net cash used by investing activities  (11,383)  (12,580)
         
Financing Activities        
Net increase in deposits and advance payments by borrowers  83,369   34,124 
Repayment of Federal Home Loan Bank advances  (242)  (238)
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank advances  -   25,000 
Increase in securities sold under repurchase agreements  (6,925)  797 
Proceeds from exercise of stock options  134   314 
Proceeds from treasury stock sales  17   9 
Net cash paid for repurchase of common stock  -   (6,293)
Cash dividends paid on common stock  (2,246)  (1,966)
Net cash provided by financing activities  74,107   51,747 
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents  70,995   44,016 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period  99,003   79,769 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $169,998  $123,785 
         
Supplemental cash flow information:        
Interest paid $2,308  $1,889 
Income taxes paid $-  $300 
Transfers from loans to real estate and other assets held for sale $259  $409 
Securities purchased but not yet settled $1,668  $529 
Sale of bank owned life insurance not yet settled $17,840  $- 

 

See accompanying notes.

 

 7 

 

 

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.

Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements (UNAUDITED)

June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015

 

1. Basis of Presentation

1.Basis of Presentation

 

First Defiance Financial Corp. (“First Defiance” or the “Company”) is a unitary thrift holding company that conducts business through its three wholly owned subsidiaries, First Federal Bank of the Midwest (“First Federal”), First Insurance Group of the Midwest, Inc. (“First Insurance”), and First Defiance Risk Management Inc. (“First Defiance Risk Management”). All significant intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.

 

First Federal is primarily engaged in attracting deposits from the general public through its offices and using those and other available sources of funds to originate loans primarily in the counties in which its offices are located. First Federal’s traditional banking activities include originating and servicing residential, non-residential real estate, commercial, home improvement and home equity and consumer loans and providing a broad range of depository, trust and wealth management services. In addition, First Federal invests in U.S. Treasury and federal government agency obligations, obligations of the State of Ohio and its political subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities that are issued by federal agencies, including real estate mortgage investment conduits (“REMICs”) and collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMOs”), and corporate bonds. First Insurance is an insurance agency that conducts business through offices located in the Defiance, Maumee, Oregon, Bryan, Lima and Bowling Green, Ohio areas. First Insurance offers property and casualty insurance, life insurance and group health insurance. First Defiance Risk Management is a wholly-owned insurance company subsidiary of the Company that insures the Company and its subsidiaries against certain risks unique to the operations of the Company and for which insurance may not be currently available or economically feasible in today’s insurance marketplace. First Defiance Risk Management pools resources with several other similar insurance company subsidiaries of financial institutions to spread a limited amount of risk among themselves.

 

The consolidated condensed statement of financial condition at December 31, 20152016 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date, which were included in First Defiance’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.31,2016.

 

The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and for the three and six month periods ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 have been prepared by First Defiance without audit and do not include information or footnotes necessary for the complete presentation of financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. These consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in First Defiance's 20152016 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016. However, in the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of only normal recurring items, necessary for the fair presentation of the financial statements have been made. The results for the three and six month periodsperiod ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

 

 8 

 

 

2.Significant Accounting Policies

2.Significant Accounting Policies

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in theconsolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates and assumptions affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the disclosures provided, and actual results could differ.

 

Earnings Per Common Share

 

Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. All outstanding unvested share-based payment awardsthat contain rights to nonforfeitable dividends are considered participating securities for the calculation. Diluted earnings per common share include the dilutive effect of additional potential common shares issuable under stock options, restricted stock awards and stock grants.

 

Goodwill and Other Intangibles

Goodwill resulting from business combinations prior to January 1, 2009 represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill resulting from business combinations after January 1, 2009, is generally determined as the excess of the fair value of the consideration transferred, plus the fair value of any noncontrolling interests in the acquiree, over the fair value of the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date. Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but tested for impairment at least annually. The Company has selected November 30 as the date to perform the annual impairment test. Intangible assets with definite useful lives are amortized over their estimated useful lives to their estimated residual values. Goodwill is the only intangible asset with an indefinite life on First Defiance’s balance sheet.

Other intangible assets consist of core deposit and acquired customer relationship intangible assets arising from whole bank, insurance and branch acquisitions. They are initially recorded at fair value and then amortized on an accelerated basis over their estimated lives, which range from five years for non-compete agreements to 10 to 20 years for core deposit and customer relationship intangibles.

Newly Issued Accounting Standards

 

In March 2016,2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting StandardsStandard Update (“ASU”) 2016-09:Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): ImprovementsNo. 2017-08, “Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities.” This ASU shortens the amortization period for the premium on certain purchased callable debt securities to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting.the earliest call date. Today, entities generally amortize the premium over the contractual life of the security. The amendments in ASU 2016-09 simplify several aspects ofnew guidance does not change the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, includingpurchased callable debt securities held at a discount; the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows.discount continues to be amortized to maturity. ASU 2016-09No. 2017-08 is effective for public companies for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, with2018; early adoption is permitted. The Company electedguidance calls for a modified retrospective transition approach under which a cumulative-effect adjustment will be made to adopt ASU 2016-09 inretained earnings as of the second quarterbeginning of 2016. As a result of adoption, net income for the first quarter of 2016 was revised to reflect a $99,000 reduction to tax expense,reporting period in which increased net income by $99,000 and a credit to tax expense was recorded in the second quarter of 2016. Also as a result of adoption, the Companyguidance is accounting for forfeitures as they occur and the amounts previously recorded in equity are prospectively being recorded as income tax benefits. The excess income tax benefits are reflected in the operating activities in the Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (Topic 842):Leases. The main objective of ASU 2016-02 is to provide users with useful, transparent, and complete information about leasing transactions. ASU 2016-02 requires the rights and obligations associated with leasing arrangements be reflected on the balance sheet in order to increase transparency and comparability among organizations. Under the updated guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a right-to-use asset and a liability to make a lease payment and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. ASU 2016-02 is effective for public companies for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted.adopted. The Company is currently assessingevaluating the impactprovisions of ASU 2016-02No. 2017-08 to determine the potential impact the new standard will have on itsthe Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.Statements.

 

 9 

 

 

In January 2016,March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01:Financial Instruments – Overall (Subtopic 825-10):  RecognitionNo. 2017-07, “Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities.  The main objective of ASU 2016-01 is to enhanceNet Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost.” Under the reporting model for financial instruments to provide users of financial statements with more decision-useful information.  ASU 2016-01 addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments.  Somenew guidance, employers will present the service cost component of the amendments in ASU 2016-01  include the following:   1)  Require equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; 2)  Simplify the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; 3)  Require public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; and 4)  Require an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total changeperiodic benefit cost in the fair value of a liability resultingsame income statement line item (e.g., Salaries and Benefits) as other employee compensation costs arising from a changeservices rendered during the period. In addition, only the service cost component will be eligible for capitalization in assets. Employers will present the instrument-specific credit risk whenother components separately (e.g., Other Noninterest Expense) from the entity has elected to measureline item that includes the liability at fair value; among others.  For public business entities, the amendments ofservice cost. ASU 2016-01 areNo. 2017-07 is effective for fiscal yearsinterim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years.2017. Early adoption is permitted, however, the Company has decided not to early adopt. Employers will apply the guidance on the presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost in the income statement retrospectively. The guidance limiting the capitalization of net periodic benefit cost in assets to the service cost component will be applied prospectively. The Company expects to utilize the ASU’s practical expedient allowing entities to estimate amounts for comparative periods using the information previously disclosed in their pension and other postretirement benefit plan footnote. ASU No. 2017-07 is currently evaluatingnot expected to have a material impact on the effects of ASU 2016-01 on itsCompany’s Consolidated Financial StatementsStatements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,“Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment.” The guidance removes Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test, which requires a hypothetical purchase price allocation. Goodwill impairment will now be the amount by which a reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. All other goodwill impairment guidance will remain largely unchanged. ASU No. 2017-04 is effective for interim and disclosures.   annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019, applied prospectively. Early adoption is permitted for any impairment tests performed after January 1, 2017. The Company expects to early adopt upon the next goodwill impairment test in 2017. ASU No. 2017-04 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13:No. 2016-13,Financial Instruments-Credit Losses(Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial InstrumentsInstruments.”. The This ASU requires an organization tosignificantly changes how entities will measure all expected credit losses for most financial assets heldand certain other instruments that aren’t measured at fair value through net income. In issuing the reporting date based on historical experience,standard, the FASB is responding to criticism that today’s guidance delays recognition of credit losses. The standard will replace today’s “incurred loss” approach with an “expected loss” model. The new model, referred to as the current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. Financial institutions and other organizations will now use forward-looking information to better inform theirexpected credit loss estimates. Many(“CECL”) model, will apply to: (1) financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, and (2) certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes, but is not limited to, loans, leases, held-to-maturity securities, loan commitments, and financial guarantees. The CECL model does not apply to available-for-sale (“AFS”) debt securities. For AFS debt securities with unrealized losses, entities will measure credit losses in a manner similar to what they do today, except that the losses will be recognized as allowances rather than reductions in the amortized cost of the loss estimation techniques applied todaysecurities. As a result, entities will still be permitted, although the inputsrecognize improvements to those techniques will change to reflect the full amount of expectedestimated credit losses. Organizations will continue to use judgment to determine which loss estimation method is appropriate for their circumstances. Additionally, thelosses immediately in earnings rather than as interest income over time, as they do today. The ASU amendsalso simplifies the accounting model for credit losses on available-for-salepurchased credit-impaired debt securities and purchasedloans. ASU 2016-13 also expands the disclosure requirements regarding an entity’s assumptions, models, and methods for estimating the allowance for loan and lease losses. In addition, entities will need to disclose the amortized cost balance for each class of financial assets withasset by credit deterioration.quality indicator, disaggregated by the year of origination. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for public companies forinterim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 13, 2019, including15, 2019; early adoption is permitted for interim and annual reporting periods within those fiscal years.beginning after December 15, 2018. Entities will apply the standard'sstandard’s provisions as a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted.effective (i.e., modified retrospective approach). The Company has not yet determinedbegun its implementation efforts by establishing a Company-wide implementation committee. The committee’sinitial review indicates the Company has maintained sufficient historical loan data to support the requirement of this pronouncement and is currently evaluating the various loss methodologies to determine their correlations to the Company’s loan segments historical performance.

10

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 — Leases (Topic 842). The objective of the update is to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU 2016-13this standard will have on its financial position and results of operations, though the Company expects that its real estate leases will be recognized on the consolidated balance sheet.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01 — Financial Instruments — Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. The amendments in this update address certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. The ASU is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2017, and requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to the balance sheet as of the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. Early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements. Management’s preliminary finding is that the new pronouncement will not have a significant impact on its results of operations. The pronouncement will require some revision to the Company’s disclosures within the consolidated financial statements and is currently evaluating the impact.

In May 2014, the FASB and the International Accounting Standards Board (the “IASB”) jointly issued a comprehensive new revenue recognition standard that will supersede nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance under GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”). Previous revenue recognition guidance in GAAP consisted of broad revenue recognition concepts together with numerous revenue requirements for particular industries or transactions, which sometimes resulted in different accounting for economically similar transactions. In contrast, IFRS provided limited revenue recognition guidance and, consequently, could be difficult to apply to complex transactions. Accordingly, the FASB and the IASB initiated a joint project to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue and to develop a common revenue standard for U.S. GAAP and IFRS that would: (1) remove inconsistencies and weaknesses in revenue requirements; (2) provide a more robust framework for addressing revenue issues; (3) improve comparability of revenue recognition practices across entities, industries, jurisdictions, and capital markets; (4) provide more useful information to users of financial statements through improved disclosure requirements; and (5) simplify the preparation of financial statements by reducing the number of requirements to which an entity must refer. To meet those objectives, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In doing so, companies generally will be required to use more judgment and make more estimates than under current guidance. These may include identifying performance obligations in the contract, estimating the amount of variable consideration to include in the transaction price and allocating the transaction price to each separate performance obligation. The standard was initially effective for public entities for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016; early adoption was not permitted. However, in August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14,“Revenue from Contracts with Customers - Deferral of the Effective Date” which deferred the effective date by one year (i.e., interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017). For financial reporting purposes, the standard allows for either full retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied to all of the periods presented, or modified retrospective adoption, meaning the standard is applied only to the most current period presented in the financial statements with the cumulative effect of initially applying the standard recognized at the date of initial application. In addition, the FASB has begun to issue targeted updates to clarify specific implementation issues of ASU 2014-09. These updates include ASU No. 2016-08,“Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” ASU No. 2016-10,“Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” ASU No. 2016-12,“Narrow-Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients,” and ASU No. 2016-20“Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers.” Since the guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities that are accounted for under other GAAP, the Company does not expect the new guidance to have a material impact on revenue most closely associated with financial instruments, including interest income and expense. The Company is currently performing an overall assessment of revenue streams and reviewing contracts potentially affected by the ASU including trust and asset management fees, deposit related fees, interchange fees, and insurance commission income, to determine the potential impact the new guidance is expected to have on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and disclosures.Statements. The Company plans to adopt ASU No. 2014-09 on January 1, 2018 utilizing the modified retrospective approach.

 

11

3. Fair Value

3.Fair Value

 

FASB ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A fair value measurement assumes that the transaction to sell the asset or transfer the liability occurs in the principal market for the asset or liability or, in the absence of a principal market, the most advantageous market for the asset or liability. The price in the principal (or most advantageous) market used to measure the fair value of the asset or liability shall not be adjusted for transaction costs. An orderly transaction is a transaction that assumes exposure to the market for a period prior to the measurement date to allow for marketing activities that are usual and customary for transactions involving such assets and liabilities; it is not a forced transaction. Market participants are buyers and sellers in the principal market that are (i) independent, (ii) knowledgeable, (iii) able to transact and (iv) willing to transact.

10

 

FASB ASC Topic 820 requires the use of valuation techniques that are consistent with the market approach, the income approach and/or the cost approach. The market approach uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets and liabilities. The income approach uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts, such as cash flows or earnings, to a single present amount on a discounted basis. The cost approach is based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost). Valuation techniques should be consistently applied. Inputs to valuation techniques refer to the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Inputs may be observable, meaning those that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on the best information available. In that regard, FASB ASC Topic 820 established a fair value hierarchy for valuation inputs that gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The fair value hierarchy is as follows:

 

12

·Level 1: Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

 

·Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. These might include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (such as interest rates, prepayment speeds, credit risks, etc.) or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by market data by a correlation or other means.

 

·Level 3: Unobservable inputs for determining fair value of assets and liabilities that reflect an entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the assets or liabilities.

 

A description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured at fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy, is set forth below.

 

Available for sale securities - Securities classified as available for sale are generally reported at fair value utilizing Level 2 inputs where the Company obtains fair value measurements from an independent pricing service that uses matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique widely used in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted securities (Level 2 inputs). The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes, market spreads, cash flows and the bonds’ terms and conditions, among other things. Securities in Level 1 include federal agency preferred stock securities. Securities in Level 2 include U.S. Government agencies, mortgage-backed securities, corporate bonds and municipal securities.

11

 

Impaired loans -Fair values for impaired collateral dependent loans are generally based on appraisals obtained from licensed real estate appraisers and in certain circumstances consideration of offers obtained to purchase properties prior to foreclosure.  Appraisals for commercial real estate generally use three methods to derive value: cost, sales or market comparison and income approach.  The cost method bases value on the cost to replace the current property.  Value of market comparison approach evaluates the sales price of similar properties in the same market area.  The income approach considers net operating income generated by the property and an investors required return.  Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available.  Comparable sales adjustments are based on known sales prices of similar type and similar use properties and duration of time that the property has been on the market to sell.  Such adjustments made in the appraisal process are typically significant and result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

 

13

Real Estate held for sale- Assets acquired through or instead of loan foreclosure are initially recorded at fair value less costs to sell when acquired, establishing a new cost basis. These assets are then reviewed monthly by members of the asset review committee for valuation changes and are accounted for at lower of cost or fair value less estimated costs to sell. Fair value is commonly based on recent real estate appraisals which may utilize a single valuation approach or a combination of approaches including cost, comparable sales and the income approach. Adjustments are routinely made in the appraisal process by the independent appraisers to adjust for differences between the comparable sales and income data available. Such adjustments may be significant and typically result in a Level 3 classification of the inputs for determining fair value.

 

Appraisals for both collateral - dependentcollateral-dependent impaired loans and other real estate owned are performed by certified general appraisers (for commercial properties) or certified residential appraisers (for residential properties) whose qualifications and licenses have been reviewed and verified by the Company.  Once received, a member of the Company’s asset quality or collections department reviews the assumptions and approaches utilized in the appraisal.  Appraisal values are discounted from 0% to 20% to account for other factors that may impact the value of collateral. In determining the value of impaired collateral dependent loans and other real estate owned, significant unobservable inputs may be used, which include:  physical condition of comparable properties sold, net operating income generated by the property and investor rates of return.

 

Mortgage servicing rights - On a quarterly basis, mortgage servicing rights are evaluated for impairment based upon the fair value of the rights as compared to the carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an individual tranche exceeds fair value, impairment is recorded on that tranche so that the servicing asset is carried at fair value. Fair value is determined at a tranche level based on a model that calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income. The valuation model utilizes assumptions that market participants would use in estimating future net servicing income and are validated against available market data (Level 2).

 

Mortgage banking derivative - The fair value of mortgage banking derivatives are evaluated monthly based on derivative valuation models using quoted prices for similar assets adjusted for specific attributes of the commitments and other observable market data at the valuation date (Level 2).

 

 1214 

 

 

The following table summarizes the financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

 

June 30, 2016 

Level 1

Inputs

  

Level 2

Inputs

  

Level 3

Inputs

  

Total Fair

Value

 
  (In Thousands) 
Available for sale securities:                
                 
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $-  $3,013  $-  $3,013 
Mortgage-backed - residential  -   61,266   -   61,266 
REMICs  -   1,522   -   1,522 
Collateralized mortgage obligations-residential  -   65,942   -   65,942 
Preferred stock  1   -   -   1 
Corporate bonds  -   11,020   -   11,020 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions  -   85,210   -   85,210 
Mortgage banking derivative - asset  -   1,294   -   1,294 
Mortgage banking derivative - liability  -   (306)  -   (306)

December 31, 2015 

Level 1

Inputs

  

Level 2

Inputs

  

Level 3

Inputs

  

Total Fair

Value

 
  (In Thousands) 
Available for sale securities:                
                 
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $-  $2,994  $-  $2,994 
Mortgage-backed - residential  -   64,654   -   64,654 
REMICs  -   1,620   -   1,620 
Collateralized mortgage obligations-residential  -   71,799   -   71,799 
Preferred stock  1   -   -   1 
Corporate bonds  -   4,977   -   4,977 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions  -   90,390       90,390 
Mortgage banking derivative - asset  -   558   -   558 

13

March 31, 2017 Level 1
Inputs
  Level 2
Inputs
  Level 3
 Inputs
  Total Fair
Value
 
  (In Thousands) 
Available for sale securities:                
                 
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies $-  $3,954  $-  $3,954 
Mortgage-backed - residential  -   80,872   -   80,872 
REMICs  -   1,260   -   1,260 
Collateralized mortgage obligations- residential  -   66,291   -   66,291 
Preferred stock  1   -   -   1 
Corporate bonds      13,083   -   13,083 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions  -   95,140   -   95,140 
Mortgage banking derivative - asset  -   598   -   598 
Mortgage banking derivative - liability  -   42   -   42 
                 
December 31, 2016 Level 1
Inputs
  Level 2
Inputs
  Level 3
 Inputs
  Total Fair
Value
 
  (In Thousands) 
Available for sale securities:                
                 
Obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies $-  $3,915  $-  $3,915 
Mortgage-backed - residential  -   81,707   -   81,707 
REMICs  -   1,307   -   1,307 
Collateralized mortgage obligations-residential  -   63,005   -   63,005 
Preferred stock  2   -   -   2 
Corporate bonds  -   13,013   -   13,013 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions  -   88,043       88,043 
Mortgage banking derivative - asset  -   491   -   491 

 

The following table summarizes the financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis segregated by the level of the valuation inputs within the fair value hierarchy utilized to measure fair value:

 

15

Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Non-Recurring Basis

 

June 30, 2016 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  

Total Fair

Value

 
  (In Thousands) 
Impaired loans                
1-4 Family Residential Real Estate $-  $-  $250  $250 
Multi Family Residential  -   -   76   76 
Commercial Real Estate  -   -   4,362   4,362 
Commercial loans  -   -   123   123 
Home Equity and Improvement  -   -   80   80 
Total Impaired loans  -   -   4,891   4,891 
                 
Mortgage servicing rights  -   3,248   -   3,248 
Real estate held for sale                
Residential  -   -   -   - 
Commercial Real Estate  -   -   130   130 
Total real estate held for sale  -   -   130   130 

December 31, 2015 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  

Total Fair

Value

 
  (In Thousands) 
Impaired loans                
1-4 Family Residential Real Estate $-  $-  $398  $398 
Multi Family Residential  -   -   91   91 
Commercial Real Estate  -   -   4,575   4,575 
Commercial loans          -   - 
Home Equity and Improvement  -   -   82   82 
Total impaired loans  -   -   5,146   5,146 
                 
Mortgage servicing rights  -   872   -   872 
Real estate held for sale                
Residential  -   -   -   - 
Commercial Real Estate  -   -   280   280 
Total Real Estate held for sale  -   -   280   280 

14

March 31, 2017 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  Total Fair
Value
 
  (In Thousands) 
Impaired loans                
 Commercial Real Estate $-  $-  $1,252  $1,252 
Total Impaired loans  -   -   1,252   1,252 
Mortgage servicing rights  -   1,131       1,131 
                 
December 31, 2016 Level 1 Inputs  Level 2 Inputs  Level 3 Inputs  Total Fair 
Value
 
  (In Thousands) 
Impaired loans                
1-4 Family Residential Real Estate $-  $-  $316  $316 
Multi Family Residential  -   -   -   - 
Commercial Real Estate  -   -   848   848 
Commercial          332   332 
Home Equity and Improvement  -   -   -   - 
Total impaired loans  -   -   1,496   1,496 
                 
Mortgage servicing rights  -   657   -   657 
Real estate held for sale                
Residential  -   -   -   - 
Commercial Real Estate  -   -   377   377 
Total Real Estate held for sale  -   -   377   377 

 

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis as of June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:

 

  

Fair

Value

  Valuation Technique Unobservable Inputs 

Range of

Inputs

  

Weighted

Average

 
  (Dollars in Thousands) 
              
Impaired Loans- Applies to all loan classes $4,891  Appraisals which utilize sales comparison, net income and cost approach Discounts for collection issues and changes in market conditions  10-40%  11%
                 
Real estate held for sale – Applies to all classes $130  Appraisals which utilize sales comparison, net income and cost approach Discounts for changes in market conditions  20%  20%
  Fair
Value
  Valuation Technique Unobservable Inputs Range of
Inputs
  Weighted
Average
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)
                 
Impaired Loans- Applies to all loan classes $1,252  Appraisals which utilize sales comparison, net income and cost approach Discounts for collection issues and changes in market conditions  10%  10%

 

For Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring or nonrecurring basis as of December 31, 2015,2016, the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurements were as follows:

 

  

Fair

Value

  Valuation Technique Unobservable Inputs 

Range of

Inputs

  

Weighted

Average

 
  (Dollars in Thousands) 
              
Impaired Loans- Applies to all loan classes $5,146  Appraisals which utilize sales comparison, net income and cost approach Discounts for collection issues and changes in market conditions  10-30%  11%
                 
Real estate held for sale – Applies to all classes $280  Appraisals which utilize sales comparison, net income and cost approach Discounts for changes in market conditions  30%  30%
16

  Fair
Value
  Valuation Technique Unobservable Inputs Range of
Inputs
 Weighted
Average
 
     (Dollars in Thousands)
             
Impaired Loans- Applies to all loan classes $1,496  Appraisals which utilize sales comparison, net income and cost approach Discounts for collection issues and changes in market conditions  10-30% 11%
               
Real estate held for sale – Applies to all classes $377  Appraisals which utilize sales comparison, net income and cost approach Discounts for changes in market conditions  0-20% 7%

 

Impaired loans, which are measured for impairment using the fair value of the collateral for collateral dependent loans, had a fair value of $4.9$1.3 million, with a $16,000no valuation allowance and a fair value of $5.1$1.5 million, with an $8,000a $1,000 valuation allowance at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively. A provision recoveryexpense of $79,000 and $198,000$208,000 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and a provision recovery of $98,000 and $719,000$119,000 for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2015, wereMarch 31, 2016 was included in earnings.

 

Mortgage servicing rights which are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, had a fair value of $3.2$1.1 million with a valuation allowance of $770,000$489,000 and a fair value of $872,000$657,000 with a valuation allowance of $645,000$522,000 at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively. A recovery of $33,000 and a charge of $104,000 and $125,000$21,000 for the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016, and a recovery of $141,000 and $167,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively, were included in earnings.

 

Real estate held for sale is determined using Level 3 inputs which include appraisals and are adjusted for estimated costs to sell. The impact to earnings of the change in fair value of real estate held for sale was $0 andnot material for the three months ended March 31, 2017. The change in fair value of real estate held for sale was $53,000 for the three and six months ended June 30,March 31, 2016, which was recorded directly as an adjustment to current earnings through non-interest expense. The change in fair value of real estate held for sale was $182,000 and $705,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.

15

 

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 825, the Fair Value Measurements tables are a comparative condensed consolidated statement of financial condition based on carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015.2016. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of First Defiance.

 

Much of the information used to arrive at “fair value” is highly subjective and judgmental in nature and therefore the results may not be precise. Subjective factors include, among other things, estimated cash flows, risk characteristics and interest rates, all of which are subject to change. With the exception of investment securities, the Company’s financial instruments are not readily marketable and market prices do not exist. Since negotiated prices for the instruments, which are not readily marketable depend greatly on the motivation of the buyer and seller, the amounts that will actually be realized or paid per settlement or maturity of these instruments could be significantly different.

 

The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, term notes payable and advance payments by borrowers for taxes and insurance, as a result of their short-term nature, is considered to be equal to fair value and are classified as Level 1.

 

17

It was not practicable to determine the fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) stock due to restrictions placed on its transferability.

 

The fair value of loans that reprice within 90 days is equal to their carrying amount. For other loans, the estimated fair value is calculated based on discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms, resulting in a Level 3 classification. Impaired loans are valued at the lower of cost ofor fair value as previously described. The allowance for loan losses is considered to be a reasonable adjustment for credit risk. The methods utilized to estimate the fair value of loans do not necessarily represent an exit price. The fair value of loans held for sale is estimated based on binding contracts and quotes from third party investors resulting in a Level 2 classification.

 

The fair value of accrued interest receivable is equal to the carrying amounts resulting in a Level 2 or Level 3 classification which is consistent with its underlying value.

 

The fair value of non-interest bearing deposits are considered equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (i.e. carrying value) and are classified as Level 1. The fair value of savings, NOW and certain money market accounts are equal to their carrying amounts and are a Level 2 classification. Fair values of fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered on certificates to a schedule of aggregated expected monthly maturities on time deposits resulting in a Level 2 classification.

 

The fair values of securities sold under repurchase agreements are equal to their carrying amounts resulting in a Level 2 classification. The carrying value of subordinated debentures and deposits with fixed maturities is estimated based on discounted cash flow analyses based on interest rates currently being offered on instruments with similar characteristics and maturities resulting in a Level 3 classification.

16

 

FHLB advances with maturities greater than 90 days are valued based on discounted cash flow analysis, using interest rates currently being quoted for similar characteristics and maturities resulting in a Level 2 classification. The cost or value of any call or put options is based on the estimated cost to settle the option at June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017.

     

Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2016

(In Thousands)

 
  

Carrying

Value

  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Financial Assets:                    
Cash and cash equivalents $130,546  $130,546  $130,546  $-  $- 
Investment securities  228,172   228,173   1   228,172   - 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock  13,800   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Loans, net, including loans held for sale  1,848,597   1,863,425   -   14,027   1,849,398 
Accrued interest receivable  6,421   6,421   8   811   5,602 
                     
Financial Liabilities:                    
Deposits $1,920,270  $1,925,357  $442,811  $1,482,546  $- 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  84,425   85,058   -   85,058   - 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements  52,989   52,989   -   52,989   - 
Subordinated debentures  36,083   35,380   -   -   35,380 

     

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015

(In Thousands)

 
  Carrying
Value
  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Financial Assets:                    
Cash and cash equivalents $79,769  $79,769  $79,769  $-  $- 
Investment securities  236,678   236,680   1   236,679   - 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock  13,801   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Loans, net, including loans held for sale  1,782,358   1,784,998   -   5,899   1,779,099 
Accrued interest receivable  6,171   6,171   7   846   5,318 
                     
Financial Liabilities:                    
Deposits $1,836,137  $1,840,464  $420,691  $1,419,773  $- 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  59,902   59,653   -   59,653   - 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements  57,188   57,188   -   57,188   - 
Subordinated debentures  36,083   35,305   -   -   35,305 

 

 1718 

 

 

     Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2017
(In Thousands)
 
  Carrying
Value
  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Financial Assets:                    
Cash and cash equivalents $169,998  $169,998  $169,998  $-  $- 
Investment securities  261,372   261,374   1   261,373   - 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock  15,992   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Loans, net, including loans held for sale  2,221,070   2,207,503   -   8,425   2,199,078 
Accrued interest receivable  8,872   8,872   5   1,465   7,402 
                     
Financial Liabilities:                    
Deposits $2,373,789  $2,380,541  $579,943  $1,800,598  $- 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  105,104   104,500   -   104,500   - 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements  24,891   24,891   -   24,891   - 
Subordinated debentures  36,083   34,735   -   -   34,735 
                     
     Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
  Carrying 
Value
  Total  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
Financial Assets:                    
Cash and cash equivalents $99,003  $99,003  $99,003  $-  $- 
Investment securities  251,176   251,179   2   251,177   - 
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock  13,798   N/A   N/A   N/A   N/A 
Loans, net, including loans held for sale  1,924,210   1,911,280   -   9,917   1,901,363 
Accrued interest receivable  6,760   6,760   9   867   5,884 
                     
Financial Liabilities:                    
Deposits $1,981,628  $1,987,723  $487,663  $1,500,060  $- 
Advances from Federal Home Loan Bank  103,943   103,019   -   103,019   - 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements  31,816   31,816   -   31,816   - 
Subordinated debentures  36,083   34,718   -   -   34,718 

4. Incentive Compensation Plans

4.Stock Compensation Plans

 

First Defiance has established equity based compensation plans for its directors and employees. On March 15, 2010, the Board adopted, and the shareholders approved at the 2010 Annual Shareholders Meeting, the First Defiance Financial Corp. 2010 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2010 Equity Plan”). The 2010 Equity Plan replaced all pre-existingexisting plans. All awards currently outstanding under prior plans will remain in effect in accordance with their respective terms. Any new awards will be made under the 2010 Equity Plan. The 2010 Equity Plan allows for issuance of up to 350,000 common shares through the award of options, stock grants, restricted stock units (“RSU”), stock appreciation rights or other stock-based awards.

 

As of June 30, 2016, 65,800March 31, 2017, 47,200 options had been granted and remain outstanding at option prices based on the market value of the underlying shares on the date the options were granted. Options granted under all plans vest 20% per year.year except for the 2009 grant to the Company’s executive officers, which vested 40% in 2011 and then 20% annually. All options expire ten years from the date of grant. Vested options of retirees expire on the earlier of the scheduled expiration date or three months after the retirement date.

 

19

In each of the years 2014-2016,2016-2017, the Company approved a Short-Term (“STIP”) Equity Incentive Plan (“STIP”) and a Long-Term (“LTIP”) Equity Incentive Plan (“LTIP”) for selected senior members of management.

 

Under the 20142016 and 20152017 STIPs, the participants could earn up to 30% to 45% of their salary for potential payout based on the achievement of certain corporate performance targets during the calendar year. The 2016 STIP allows participants to earn up to 10% to 45% of their salary for potential payout based on the achievement of certain corporate performance targets during the calendar year. The final amount of benefits under the STIPs is determined as of December 31 of the same year and paid out in cash in the first quarter of the following year. The participants are required to be employed on the day of payout in order to receive such payment.

 

Under each LTIP, the participants may earn up to 20% to 45% of their salary for potential payout in the form of equity awards based on the achievement of certain corporate performance targets over a three-year period. The Company granted 30,538; 24,757;24,526 and 24,52620,657 RSU’s to the participants in the 2014, 20152016 and 20162017 LTIPs, respectively, effective January 1 in the year the award iswas made, which represents the maximum target award. The amount of benefit under each LTIP will be determined individually at the end of the 36 month performance period ending December 31. The benefits earned under each LTIP will be paid out in equity in the first quarter following the end of the performance period. The participants are required to be employed on the day of payout in order to receive such payment.

 

A total of 7,01119,219 RSU’s were issued to the participants of the 20132014 LTIP in the first quarter of 20162017 for the three year three performance period ended December 31, 2015.2016.

 

In the sixthree months ended June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, the Company also granted 2,022to employees 2,924 restricted shares, to employees. 1,000 of the shareswhich 2,727 were restricted stock units and 197 were restricted stock grants. All of these have a one-year vesting period and the remaining 1,022 shares have a 4three year vesting period. The fair value of all granted restricted shares was determined by the stock price onat the date of the grant.

18

 

The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes model. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatilities of the Company’s common stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and post-vesting termination behavior. The expected term of options granted is based on historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding, which takes into account that the options are not transferable. The risk-free interest rate for the expected term of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.

  

20

The fair value of stock options granted during the sixthree months ended June 30,March 31, 2016 was determined at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes stock option-pricing model and the following assumptions:

 

  Six Months Ended 
  June 30, 2016  June 30, 2015 
Expected average risk-free rate  2.24%  2.04%
Expected average life  10.00 years   10.00 years 
Expected volatility  41.00%  42.00%
Expected dividend yield  2.33%  2.10%
Three Months ended
March 31, 2017March 31, 2016
Expected average risk-free rate-2.24%
Expected average life-10.00 years
Expected volatility-41.00%
Expected dividend yield-2.33%

 

There were no options granted during the three months ended March 31, 2017. The weighted-average fair value of options granted was $13.95 for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2016 and $13.13 for the six months ended June 30, 2015.March 31, 2016.

 

Following is stock option activity under the plans during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2016:March 31, 2017:

 

Stock options Options
Outstanding
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in 000’s)
 
Options outstanding, January 1, 2016  86,220  $20.27         
Forfeited or cancelled  -   -         
Exercised  (26,920)  20.59         
Granted  6,500   37.78         
Options outstanding, June 30, 2016  65,800  $21.86   3.81  $1,118 
Vested or expected to vest at June 30, 2016  65,800  $21.86   3.81  $1,118 
Exercisable at June 30, 2016  48,000  $17.88   2.04  $1,006 
  Options
Outstanding
  Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
  Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual Term
(in years)
  Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
(in 000’s)
 
Options outstanding, January 1, 2017  54,750  $22.21         
Forfeited or cancelled  -   -         
Exercised  (7,550)  22.89         
Granted  -   -         
Options outstanding, March 31, 2017  47,200  $22.12   3.65  $1,300 
Vested or expected to vest at March 31, 2017  47,200  $22.12   3.65  $1,300 
Exercisable at March 31, 2017  35,100  $18.50   2.22  $1,096 

 

Proceeds, related tax benefits realized from options exercised and intrinsic value of options exercised were as follows (in 000’s)thousand’s):

 

 Three Months Ended June 30,  Six Months Ended June 30,  Three Months Ended March 31, 
 2016  2015  2016  2015  2017  2016 
Proceeds of options exercised $200  $1,718  $490  $2,777  $134  $314 
Related tax benefit recognized  36   139   110   230   44   75 
Intrinsic value of options exercised  161   877   488   1,619   200   326 

 

As of June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, there was $199,000$143,000 of total unrecognized compensation costscost related to unvested stock options granted under the Company’s equity plans. The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 3.672.93 years.

19

 

At June 30, 2016, 75,468March 31, 2017, 72,660 RSU’s and 12,1614,569 stock grants were outstanding. Compensation expense is recognized over the performance period based on the achievements of targets as established withunder the plan documents. A total expense of $707,000$849,000 was recorded during the sixthree months ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 compared to an expense of $477,000$261,000 for the same period in 2015.2016. The increase in expense is attributable to the Company’s better performance in comparison to its targets. There was approximately $367,000$188,000 included within other liabilities at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 related to the STIP.

 

  Restricted Stock Units  Stock Grants 
     Weighted-Average     Weighted-Average 
     Grant Date     Grant Date 
Unvested Shares Shares  Fair Value  Shares  Fair Value 
             
Unvested at January 1, 2016  74,545  $25.86   10,927  $30.98 
Granted  24,526   39.30   10,905   23.39 
Vested  (7,011)  19.19   (9,171)  22.50 
Forfeited  (16,592)  19.19   (500)  32.00 
Unvested at June 30, 2016  75,468  $32.31   12,161  $32.77 
21

  Restricted Stock Units  Stock Grants 
     Weighted-Average     Weighted-Average 
     Grant Date     Grant Date 
Unvested Shares Shares  Fair Value  Shares  Fair Value 
             
Unvested at January 1, 2017  75,468  $32.31   11,161  $32.30 
Granted  23,384   50.56   19,416   26.02 
Vested  (19,219)  25.77   (24,986)  25.82 
Forfeited  (6,973)  25.77   (1,022)  37.02 
Unvested at March 31, 2017  72,660  $40.54   4,569  $40.01 

 

The maximum amount of compensation expense that may be recorded for the 20162017 STIP and the 2014, 2015, 2016 and 20162017 LTIPs at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 is approximately $3.4$3.8 million. However, the estimated expense expected to be recorded as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 based on the performance measures in the plans, is $2.3$3.5 million of which $1.3$2.2 million is unrecognized at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and will be recognized over the remaining performance periods.

 

5. Dividends on Common Stock

5.Dividends on Common Stock

 

First Defiance declared and paid a $0.22 common stock dividend in the first and second quarters of 2016, and declared and paid a $0.175 and $0.20$0.25 per common stock dividend in the first quarter of 2017 and second quartersdeclared and paid a $0.22 per common stock dividend in the first quarter of 2015, respectively.2016.

 

206.

6. Earnings Per Common Share

Basic earnings per share are calculated using the two-class method. The two-class method is an earnings allocation formula under which earnings per share is calculated from common stock and participating securities according to dividends declared and participation rights in undistributed earnings. Under this method, all earnings distributed and undistributed, are allocated to participating securities and common shares based on their respective rights to receive dividends. Unvested share-based payment awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends are considered participating securities (i.e. unvested restricted stock), not subject to performance based measures.

 

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share:

 

  

Three months ended
June 30,

  

Six months ended
June 30,

 
  2016  2015  2016  2015 
Numerator for basic and diluted earnings  per common share – Net income $7,264  $6,563  $14,433  $13,164 
Denominator:                
Denominator for basic earnings per common share – weighted average common shares, including participating securities  8,968   9,268   8,981   9,251 
Effect of warrants  -   -   -   147 
Effect of employee stock options and restricted share   activity  68   81   69   85 
                 
Denominator for diluted earnings per common share share  9,036   9,349   9,050   9,483 
Basic earnings per common share $0.81  $0.71  $1.61  $1.42 
Diluted earnings per common share $0.80  $0.70  $1.59  $1.39 
22

 

There

  Three Months Ended March 31, 
  2017  2016 
  (In Thousands, except per share data) 
       
Basic Earnings Per Share:      
Net income available to common shareholders $5,140  $7,169 
Less: Income allocated to participating securities  1   3 
Net income allocated to common shareholders  5,139   7,166 
         
Weighted average common shares outstanding Including participating securities  9,446   9,006 
Less: Participating securities  5   12 
Average common shares  9,441   8,994 
         
Basic earnings per common share $0.54  $0.80 
         
Diluted Earnings Per Share:        
Net income allocated to common shareholders $5,139  $7,166 
Weighted average common shares outstanding for basic earnings per common share  9,441   8,994 
Add: Dilutive effects of stock options  56   70 
Average shares and dilutive potential common shares  9,497   9,064 
         
Diluted earnings per common share $0.54  $0.79 

Shares subject to issue upon exercise of options of 4,569 in 2017 and 12,550 in 2016 were 12,550 shares under option granted to employees excluded from the diluted earnings per common share calculation as they were anti-dilutive for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, respectively. There were 6,750 and 16,750 shares under options granted to employees excluded from the diluted earnings per common share calculation as they were anti-dilutive for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015, respectively.anti-dilutive.

 

7. Investment Securities

7.Investment Securities

 

The following is a summary of available-for-sale and held-to-maturity securities:

 

 Amortized
Cost
  Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value  Amortized
Cost
  Gross
Unrealized
Gains
  Gross
Unrealized
Losses
  Fair Value 
At June 30, 2016 (In Thousands) 
 (In Thousands) 
At March 31, 2017   
Available-for-Sale Securities:                        
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies $3,000  $13  $-  $3,013  $4,000  $-  $(46) $3,954 
Mortgage-backed securities – residential  59,632   1,634   -   61,266   81,016   587   (731)  80,872 
REMICs  1,483   39   -   1,522   1,258   2   -   1,260 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  64,401   1,576   (35)  65,942   66,263   497   (469)  66,291 
Trust preferred securities and preferred stock  -   1   -   1   -   1   -   1 
Corporate bonds  10,984   47   (11)  11,020   12,917   171   (5)  13,083 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions  80,106   5,104   -   85,210   92,791   2,800   (451)  95,140 
Totals $219,606  $8,414  $(46) $227,974  $258,245  $4,058  $(1,702) $260,601 

 

 2123 

 

 

 Amortized
Cost
  Gross
Unrecognized
Gains
  Gross
Unrecognized
Losses
  Fair Value  Amortized
Cost
  Gross
Unrecognized
Gains
  Gross
Unrecognized
Losses
  Fair
Value
 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
Held-to-Maturity Securities*:                                
FHLMC certificates $13  $-  $-  $13  $11  $-  $-  $11 
FNMA certificates  65   2   (1)  66   54   1   -   55 
GNMA certificates  27   -   -   27   21   1   -   22 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions  93   -   -   93   685   -   -   685 
Totals $198  $2  $(1) $199  $771  $2  $-  $773 

 

 Amortized
Cost
 Gross
Unrealized
Gains
 Gross
Unrealized
Losses
 Fair Value     Gross Gross    
At December 31, 2015 (In Thousands) 
Available-for-Sale Securities:                
 Amortized Unrealized Unrealized Fair 
 Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
 (In Thousands) 
At December 31, 2016                
Available-for-sale                
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies $3,000  $1  $(7) $2,994  $4,000  $-  $(85) $3,915 
Mortgage-backed securities - residential  63,815   898   (59)  64,654   82,619   390   (1,302)  81,707 
REMICs  1,592   28   -   1,620   1,309   -   (2)  1,307 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  71,176   976   (353)  71,799   63,204   422   (621)  63,005 
Preferred stock  -   1   -   1   -   2   -   2 
Corporate bonds  4,955   39   (17)  4,977   12,919   97   (3)  13,013 
Obligations of state and political subdivisions  85,680   4,712   (2)  90,390   86,165   2,491   (613)  88,043 
Total Available-for-Sale $230,218  $6,655  $(438) $236,435  $250,216  $3,402  $(2,626) $250,992 

 

    Gross Gross        Gross Gross    
 Amortized Unrecognized Unrecognized Fair  Amortized Unrecognized Unrecognized Fair 
 Cost  Gains  Losses  Value  Cost  Gains  Losses  Value 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
Held-to-Maturity Securities*:                
Held-to-Maturity                
FHLMC certificates $14  $-  $-  $14  $12  $-  $-  $12 
FNMA certificates  74   2   (1)  75   56   2   -   58 
GNMA certificates  31   1   -   32   23   1   -   24 
Obligations of states and political subdivisions  124   -   -   124   93   -   -   93 
Total Held-to-Maturity $243  $3  $(1) $245  $184  $3  $-  $187 

 

*FHLMC, FNMA, and GNMA certificates are residential mortgage-backed securities.

* FHLMC, FNMA, and GNMA certificates are residential mortgage-backed securities.

The amortized cost and fair value of the investment securities portfolio at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 are shown below by contractual maturity. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. For purposes of the maturity table, mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”), collateralized mortgage obligations (“CMO”) and REMICs, which are not due at a single maturity date, have not been allocated over the maturity groupings. These securities may mature earlier than their weighted-average contractual maturities because of principal prepayments.

 

 2224 

 

 

 Available-for-Sale  Held-to-Maturity  Available-for-Sale  Held-to-Maturity 
 Amortized Fair Amortized Fair  Amortized Fair Amortized Fair 
 Cost  Value  Cost  Value  Cost  Value  Cost  Value 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
Due in one year or less $2,718  $2,751  $-  $-  $1,457  $1,463  $-  $- 
Due after one year through five years  19,075   19,436   93   93   22,620   22,993   93   93 
Due after five years through ten years  32,113   34,256   -   -   43,015   44,719   592   592 
Due after ten years  40,184   42,801   -   -   42,616   43,003   -   - 
MBS/CMO  125,516   128,730   105   106 
MBS/CMO/REMIC  148,537   148,423   86   88 
 $219,606  $227,974  $198  $199  $258,245  $260,601  $771  $773 

 

Investment securities with a carrying amount of $148.5$160.6 million at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 were pledged as collateral on public deposits, securities sold under repurchase agreements and the Federal Reserve discount window.

 

As of June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, the Company’s investment portfolio consisted of 348445 securities, 8101 of which were in an unrealized loss position.

 

The following tables summarize First Defiance’s securities that were in an unrealized loss position at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015:2016:

 

  Duration of Unrealized Loss Position    
  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer  Total 
     Gross     Gross       
  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
  Value  Loss  Value  Loss  Value  Loses 
  (In Thousands) 
At June 30, 2016                        
Available-for-sale securities:                        
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies $-  $-  $2,749  $(35) $2,749  $(35)
Corporate bonds  989   (11)  -   -   989   (11)
Held to maturity securities:                        
FNMA certificates  32   (1)  -   -   32   (1)
Total temporarily impaired securities $1,021  $(12) $2,749  $(35) $3,770  $(47)

  Duration of Unrealized Loss Position    
  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer  Total 
     Gross     Gross       
  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
  Value  Loss  Value  Loss  Value  Loses 
  (In Thousands) 
At March 31, 2017                        
Available-for-sale securities:                        
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies $3,954  $(46) $-  $-  $3,954  $(46)
Mortgage-backed securities-residential  38,918   (731)  -   -   38,918   (731)
Collateralized mortgage obligations  26,997   (422) $1,187  $(47)  28,184   (469)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions  13,501   (451)  -   -   13,501   (451)
Corporate bonds  -   -   995   (5)  995   (5)
Total temporarily impaired securities $83,370  $(1,650) $2,182  $(52) $85,552  $(1,702)

 

 2325 

 

 

  Duration of Unrealized Loss Position    
  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer  Total 
     Gross     Gross       
  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
  Value  Loss  Value  Loss  Value  Loses 
  (In Thousands) 
At December 31, 2015                        
Available-for-sale securities:                        
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies $993  $(7) $-  $-  $993  $(7)
Collateralized mortgage obligations  12,374   (150)  8,158   (203)  20,532   (353)
Corporate bonds  983   (17)  -   -   983   (17)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions  -   -   433   (2)  433   (2)
Mortgage-backed securities-residential  12,525   (59)  -   -   12,525   (59)
Held to maturity securities:                        
FNMA certificates  13   (1)  -   -   13   (1)
Total temporarily impaired securities $26,888  $(234) $8,591  $(205) $35,479  $(439)

  Duration of Unrealized Loss Position    
  Less than 12 Months  12 Months or Longer  Total 
     Gross     Gross       
  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized  Fair  Unrealized 
  Value  Loss  Value  Loss  Value  Loses 
  (In Thousands) 
At December 31, 2016                        
Available-for-sale securities:                        
Obligations of U.S. government corporations and agencies $3,915  $(85) $-  $-  $3,915  $(85)
Mortgage-backed securities-residential  63,736   (1,302)  -   -   63,736   (1,302)
REMICs  1,308   (2)  -   -   1,308   (2)
Collateralized mortgage obligations  28,882   (566)  1,227   (55)  30,110   (621)
Corporate bonds  -   -   997   (3)  997   (3)
Obligations of state and political subdivisions  19,172   (613)  -   -   19,172   (613)
Total temporarily impaired securities $117,013  $(2,568) $2,224  $(58) $119,238  $(2,626)

 

Realized gains from the sales and calls of investment securities totaled $227,000 ($148,000 after tax) in the second quarter of 2016, while thereThere were no realized gains in the second quarter of 2015. There were realized gains from the sales and calls of investment securities totaling $358,000in the first quarter of 2017, while there were realized gains of $131,000 ($233,00092,000 after tax) forin the first six monthsquarter of 2016 compared to no realized gains for the first six months of 2015.2016.

 

Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment (“OTTI”) at least quarterly, and more frequently when economic or market conditions warrant such an evaluation. The investment portfolio is evaluated for OTTI by segregating the portfolio into two general segments. Investment securities classified as available-for-sale or held-to-maturity are generally evaluated for OTTI under FASB ASC Topic 320. Certain collateralized debt obligations (“CDOs”) are evaluated for OTTI under FASB ASC Topic 325, Investment – Other.

 

When OTTI occurs under either model, the amount of the OTTI recognized in earnings depends on whether an entity intends to sell the security or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit loss. If an entity intends to sell or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period credit loss, the OTTI shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s amortized cost basis and its fair value at the balance sheet date. If an entity does not intend to sell the security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis less any current period loss, the OTTI shall be separated into the amount representing the credit loss and the amount related to all other factors. The amount of OTTI related to the credit loss is determined based on the present value of cash flows expected to be collected compared to the book value of the security and is recognized in earnings. The amount of OTTI related to other factors shall be recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. The previous amortized cost basis less the OTTI recognized in earnings shall become the new amortized cost basis of the investment.

 

26

With the exception of corporate bonds, the above securities all have fixed interest rates, and all securities have defined maturities. Their fair value is sensitive to movements in market interest rates. First Defiance has the ability and intent to hold these investments for a time necessary to recover the amortized cost without impacting its liquidity position and it is not more than likely that the Company will be required to sell the investments before anticipated recovery.

 

24

DuringIn the first six monthsquarter of 20162017 and 2015,2016, management determined there was no OTTI.

 

The proceeds from the sales and calls of securities and the associated gains and losses are listed below:

 

 Three Months Ended
June 30,
 Six Months Ended
June 30,
  

Three Months Ended

March 31,

 
 2016  2015  2016  2015  2017 2016 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
Proceeds $3,155  $-  $8,515  $-  $-  $5,360 
Gross realized gains  227   -   358   -   -   131 
Gross realized losses  -   -   -   -   -   - 

 

 2527 

 

8. Loans

8.Loans

 

Loans receivable consist of the following:

 

 

March 31,

2017

 

December 31,

2016

 
 June 30,
2016
  December 31,
2015
  (In Thousands) 
Real Estate: (In Thousands)      
          
Secured by 1-4 family residential $206,861  $205,330  $276,761  $207,550 
Secured by multi-family residential  193,016   167,558   211,546   196,983 
Secured by commercial real estate  808,299   780,870   981,698   843,579 
Construction  161,282   163,877   199,724   182,886 
  1,369,458   1,317,635   1,669,729   1,430,998 
Other Loans:                
Commercial  428,599   419,349   504,340   469,055 
Home equity and improvement  116,685   116,962   132,965   118,429 
Consumer finance  16,690   16,281   27,696   16,680 
  561,974   552,592   665,001   604,164 
Total loans  1,931,432   1,870,227   2,334,730   2,035,162 
Deduct:                
Undisbursed loan funds  (68,850)  (66,902)  (95,460)  (93,355)
Net deferred loan origination fees and costs  (1,179)  (1,108)  (1,264)  (1,320)
Allowance for loan loss  (25,948)  (25,382)  (25,749)  (25,884)
Totals $1,835,455  $1,776,835  $2,212,257  $1,914,603 

The table above includes loans acquired during 2017 totaling $284.9 million as of February 24, 2017, which is net of purchase discount on the acquired loans of $6.0 million. The recorded investment of these loans as of March 31, 2107 was $281.8 million, net of the purchase discount of $5.9 million.

 

Loan segments have been identified by evaluating the portfolio based on collateral and credit risk characteristics.

 

The following table discloses allowance for loan loss activity for the quarter ended June 30, 2016 and 2015 by portfolio segment (In Thousands):

Quarter Ended June 30, 2016 1-4 Family
Residential
Real Estate
  Multi-
Family
Residential
Real Estate
  Commercial
Real Estate
  Construction  Commercial  Home Equity
and
Improvement
  Consumer
Finance
  Total 
Beginning Allowance $3,109  $2,250  $11,644  $489  $5,820  $2,232  $124  $25,668 
Charge-Offs  (37)  0   0   0   (19)  (66)  (17)  (139)
Recoveries  34   0   229   0   56   34   13   366 
                                 
Provisions  (267)  115   (969)  144   883   78   69   53 
Ending Allowance $2,839  $2,365  $10,904  $633  $6,740  $2,278  $189  $25,948 

Quarter Ended June 30, 2015 1-4 Family
Residential
Real Estate
  Multi-
Family
Residential
Real Estate
  Commercial
Real Estate
  Construction  Commercial  Home Equity
and
Improvement
  Consumer
Finance
  Total 
Beginning Allowance $2,483  $2,554  $11,684  $303  $6,766  $1,420  $92  $25,302 
Charge-Offs  (12)  (114)  (31)  0   (23)  (187)  (13)  (380)
Recoveries  54   0   167   0   173   51   17   462 
                                 
Provisions  352   (171)  276   5   (1,349)  823   64   0 
Ending Allowance $2,877  $2,269  $12,096  $308  $5,567  $2,107  $160  $25,384 

 2628 

 

 

The following table discloses allowance for loan loss activity for the year-to-date periodsquarters ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and June 30, 2015 by portfolio segment and impairment method (In Thousands):

 

Year-to-date Period Ended
June 30, 2016
 1-4 Family
 Residential
Real Estate
 Multi- Family
Residential
Real Estate
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Construction Commercial Home Equity
and
Improvement
 Consumer
Finance
 Total 
Quarter Ended
March 31, 2017
 1-4 Family
Residential
Real Estate
 Multi-
Family
Residential
Real Estate
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Construction Commercial Home Equity
and
Improvement
 Consumer
Finance
 Total 
Beginning Allowance $3,212  $2,151  $11,772  $517  $5,255  $2,304  $171  $25,382  $2,627  $2,228  $10,625  $450  $7,361  $2,386  $207  $25,884 
Charge-Offs  (92)  (0)  (13)  0   (355)  (96)  (17)  (573)  (49)  0   (290)  0   0   (54)  (71)  (464)
Recoveries  120   0   406   0   75   73   48   722   56   32   34   0   115   33   4   274 
Provisions  (401)  214   (1,261)  116   1,765   (3)  (13)  417   (13)  (138)  (159)  8   333   (65)  89   55 
Ending Allowance $2,839  $2,365  $10,904  $633  $6,740  $2,278  $189  $25,948  $2,621  $2,122  $10,210  $458  $7,809  $2,300  $229  $25,749 

 

Year-to-date Period Ended
June 30, 2015
 1-4 Family
Residential
Real Estate
 Multi- Family
Residential
Real Estate
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Construction Commercial Home Equity
and
Improvement
 Consumer
Finance
 Total 
Quarter Ended
March 31, 2016
 1-4 Family
Residential
Real Estate
 Multi-
Family
Residential
Real Estate
 Commercial
Real Estate
 Construction Commercial Home Equity
and
Improvement
 Consumer
Finance
 Total 
Beginning Allowance $2,494  $2,453  $11,268  $221  $6,509  $1,704  $117  $24,766  $3,212  $2,151  $11,772  $517  $5,255  $2,304  $171  $25,382 
Charge-Offs  (90)  (114)  (186)  0   (25)  (230)  (16)  (661)  (55)  0   (13)  0   (336)  (30)  0   (434)
Recoveries  73   0   764   0   213   80   29   1,159   86   0   177   0   19   39   35   356 
Provisions  400   (70)  250   87   (1,130)  553   30   120   (134)  99   (292)  (28)  882   (81)  (82)  364 
Ending Allowance $2,877  $2,269  $12,096  $308  $5,567  $2,107  $160  $25,384  $3,109  $2,250  $11,644  $489  $5,820  $2,232  $124  $25,668 

 

 2729 

 

 

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 (In Thousands):

 

  1-4 Family  Multi Family                   
  Residential  Residential  Commercial        Home Equity  Consumer    
  Real Estate  Real Estate  Real Estate  Construction  Commercial  & Improvement  Finance  Total 
Allowance for loan losses:                                
                                 
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:                                
                                 
Individually evaluated for impairment $125  $1  $108  $-  $14  $40  $-  $288 
                                 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  2,714   2,364   10,796   633   6,726   2,238   189   25,660 
                                 
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                                 
Total ending allowance balance $2,839  $2,365  $10,904  $633  $6,740  $2,278  $189  $25,948 
                                 
Loans:                                
                                 
Loans individually evaluated for impairment $7,113  $4,021  $15,920  $-  $3,564  $1,638  $64  $32,320 
                                 
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment  200,037   189,160   794,596   92,221   426,304   115,584   16,622   1,834,524 
                                 
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality  -   -   147   -   13   -   -   160 
                                 
Total ending loans balance $207,150  $193,181  $810,663  $92,221  $429,881  $117,222  $16,686  $1,867,004 

  1-4 Family  Multi Family                   
  Residential  Residential  Commercial       Home Equity  Consumer     
  Real Estate  Real Estate  Real Estate  Construction  Commercial  & Improvement  Finance  Total 
Allowance for loan losses:                                
                                 
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:                                
                                 
Individually evaluated for impairment $196  $4  $170  $-  $101  $300  $1  $772 
                                 
Collectively evaluated for impairment  2,425   2,118   10,040   458   7,708   2,000   228   24,977 
                                 
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                                 
Total ending allowance balance $2,621  $2,122  $10,210  $458  $7,809  $2,300  $229  $25,749 
                                 
Loans:                                
                                 
Loans individually evaluated for impairment $6,725  $3,340  $13,162  $-  $4,111  $1,202  $70  $28,610 
                                 
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment  269,194   208,437   969,583   104,036   501,349   132,404   27,662   2,212,665 
                                 
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality  1,247   -   2,253   -   632   -   -   4,132 
                                 
Total ending loans balance $277,166  $211,777  $984,998  $104,036  $506,092  $133,606  $27,732  $2,245,407 

 

 2830 

 

 

The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment and based on impairment method as of December 31, 20152016 (In Thousands):

 

 1-4 Family Multi Family              1-4 Family Multi Family             
 Residential Residential Commercial     Home Equity Consumer    Residential Residential Commercial     Home Equity Consumer   
 Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Construction Commercial & Improvement Finance Total  Real Estate Real Estate Real Estate Construction Commercial & Improvement Finance Total 
Allowance for loan losses:                                                                
                                                                
Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:                                                                
                                                                
Individually evaluated for impairment $201  $-  $139  $-  $63  $34  $-  $437  $202  $4  $255  $-  $35  $313  $-  $809 
                                                                
Collectively evaluated for impairment  3,011   2,151   11,633   517   5,192   2,270   171   24,945   2,425   2,224   10,370   450   7,326   2,073   207   25,075 
                                                                
Acquired with deteriorated credit quality  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
                                                                
Total ending allowance balance $3,212  $2,151  $11,772  $517  $5,255  $2,304  $171  $25,382  $2,627  $2,228  $10,625  $450  $7,361  $2,386  $207  $25,884 
                                                                
Loans:                                                                
                                                                
Loans individually evaluated for impairment $7,574  $3,313  $23,493  $-  $6,107  $1,491  $71  $42,049  $6,898  $3,483  $13,570  $-  $2,154  $1,269  $59  $27,433 
                                                                
Loans collectively evaluated for impairment  198,106   164,382   759,281   96,845   414,527   115,977   16,199   1,765,317   200,907   193,714   832,446   89,244   468,246   117,744   16,625   1,918,926  
                                                                
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality  -   -   153   -   16   -   -   169   -   -   -   -   11   -   -   11 
                                                                
Total ending loans balance $205,680  $167,695  $782,927  $96,845  $420,650  $117,468  $16,270  $1,807,535  $207,805  $197,197  $846,016  $89,244  $470,411  $119,013  $16,684  $1,946,370 

 

 29

The following table presents the average balance, interest income recognized and cash basis income recognized on impaired loans by class of loans (In Thousands):

  Three Months Ended June 30, 2016  Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 
  Average
Balance
  Interest
Income
Recognized
  Cash Basis
Income
Recognized
  Average
Balance
  Interest
Income
Recognized
  Cash Basis
Income
Recognized
 
Residential Owner Occupied $3,774  $36  $34  $3,900  $75  $73 
Residential Non Owner Occupied  3,211   31   31   3,384   66   65 
Total Residential Real Estate  6,985   67   65   7,284   141   138 
Construction  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Multi-Family  4,063   24   24   4,328   54   54 
CRE Owner Occupied  7,169   42   37   8,130   104   85 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  4,900   52   53   4,659   105   102 
Agriculture Land  1,838   15   2   2,716   50   14 
Other CRE  1,675   14   14   1,548   18   18 
Total Commercial Real Estate  15,582   123   106   17,053   277   219 
Commercial Working Capital  1,535   15   7   1,524   30   22 
Commercial Other  1,783   9   9   3,014   28   27 
Total Commercial  3,318   24   16   4,538   58   49 
Home Equity and  Improvement  1,699   13   13   1,724   28   28 
Consumer Finance  68   1   1   71   2   2 
Total Impaired Loans $31,715  $252  $225  $34,998  $560  $490 

3031 

 

 

The following table presents the average balance, interest income recognized and cash basis income recognized on impaired loans by class of loans (In Thousands):

 

 Three Months Ended June 30, 2015 Six Months Ended June 30, 2015  Three Months Ended March 31, 2017 
 Average
Balance
  Interest
Income
Recognized
  Cash Basis
Income
Recognized
  Average
Balance
  Interest
Income
Recognized
  Cash Basis
Income
Recognized
  Average
Balance
  Interest
 Income
 Recognized
  Cash Basis
 Income
Recognized
 
Residential Owner Occupied $5,819  $68  $67  $5,905  $136  $135  $2,820  $28  $28 
Residential Non Owner Occupied  4,027   38   39   4,187   79   79   3,891   36   36 
Total Residential Real Estate  9,846   106   106   10,092   215   214   6,711   64   64 
Construction  -   -   -   75   2   2 
Multi-Family  2,408   5   6   2,435   13   14   3,374   10   10 
CRE Owner Occupied  6,711   41   29   6,612   78   68   4,614   22   22 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  9,452   111   129   9,820   244   264   4,499   42   39 
Agriculture Land  2,228   25   15   1,494   32   28   2,707   47   19 
Other CRE  2,118   16   16   2,280   26   25   1,668   13   12 
Total Commercial Real Estate  20,509   193   189   20,206   380   385   13,488   124   92 
Construction  -   -   - 
Commercial Working Capital  1,537   14   12   1,702   27   25   2,372   19   19 
Commercial Other  3,622   13   17   3,731   26   35   1,722   21   16 
Total Commercial  5,159   27   29   5,433   53   60   4,094   40   35 
Home Equity and Improvement  2,409   21   21   2,305   41   41 
Home Equity and Home Improvement  1,254   10   10 
Consumer Finance  65   1   1   54   1   1   74   1   1 
Total Impaired Loans $40,396  $353  $352  $40,600  $705  $717  $28,995  $249  $212 

  

 3132 

 

The following table presents the average balance, interest income recognized and cash basis income recognized on impaired loans by class of loans (In Thousands):

  Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 
  Average
Balance
  Interest
Income
Recognized
  Cash Basis
Income
Recognized
 
Residential Owner Occupied $4,025  $39  $39 
Residential Non Owner Occupied  3,557   35   34 
Total Residential Real Estate  7,582   74   73 
Multi-Family  4,593   30   30 
CRE Owner Occupied  9,090   62   48 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  4,418   53   49 
Agriculture Land  3,593   35   12 
Other CRE  1,422   4   4 
Total Commercial Real Estate  18,523   154   113 
Construction  -   -   - 
Commercial Working Capital  1,513   15   15 
Commercial Other  4,245   19   18 
Total Commercial  5,758   34   33 
Home Equity and Home Improvement  1,749   15   15 
Consumer Finance  73   1   1 
Total Impaired Loans $38,278  $308  $265 

33

 

The following table presents loans individually evaluated for impairment by class of loans (In Thousands):

 

 June 30, 2016 December 31, 2015     March 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
 Unpaid
Principal
Balance*
  Recorded
Investment
  Allowance
for Loan
Losses
Allocated
  

 

Unpaid
Principal
Balance*

  Recorded
Investment
  Allowance
for Loan
Losses
Allocated
  

Unpaid

Principal

Balance*

  Recorded
Investment
  Allowance
for Loan
Losses
Allocated
  

Unpaid

Principal

Balance*

  Recorded
Investment
  Allowance
for Loan
Losses
Allocated
 
With no allowance recorded:                                                
Residential Owner Occupied $1,498  $1,477  $-  $1,383  $1,360  $-  $1,906  $1,760  $-  $1,912  $1,765  $- 
Residential Non Owner Occupied  1,889   1,882   -   2,147   2,141   -   1,769   1,762   -   1,691   1,683   - 
Total 1-4 Family Residential Real Estate  3,387   3,359   -   3,530   3,501   -   3,675   3,522   -   3,603   3,448   - 
Multi-Family Residential Real Estate  4,112   3,965   -   3,463   3,313   -   3,288   3,288   -   3,578   3,430   - 
CRE Owner Occupied  5,856   5,565   -   4,869   4,520   -   3,048   2,611   -   2,652   2,353   - 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  4,012   3,772   -   7,932   7,685   -   4,114   3,896   -   4,372   4,240   - 
Agriculture Land  1,775   1,802   -   3,546   3,596   -   2,617   2,649   -   1,695   1,722   - 
Other CRE  1,282   1,177   -   4,076   4,046   -   1,020   950   -   1,225   1,115   - 
Total Commercial Real Estate  12,925   12,316   -   20,423   19,847   -   10,799   10,106   -   9,944   9,430   - 
Construction  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Commercial Working Capital  1,525   1,490   -   1,644   1,648   -   2,228   2,183   -   838   786   - 
Commercial Other  1,823   1,649   -   3,573   3,607   -   1,782   1,620   -   1,179   967   - 
Total Commercial  3,348   3,139   -   5,217   5,255   -   4,010   3,803   -   2,017   1,753   - 
                                              - 
Home Equity and Improvement  825   780   -   817   772   - 
Home Equity and Home Improvement  621   575   -   631   585   - 
Consumer Finance  48   48   -   60   59   -   53   53   -   55   55  $- 
                                                
Total loans with no allowance recorded $24,645  $23,607  $-  $33,510  $32,747  $-  $22,446  $21,347  $-  $19,828  $8,701     
                                                
With an allowance recorded:                                                
Residential Owner Occupied $2,448  $2,421  $97  $2,918  $2,837  $188  $2,159  $2,132  $157  $2,348  $2,319  $157 
Residential Non Owner Occupied  1,327   1,333   28   1,231   1,236   13   1,078   1,071   39   1,137   1,131   45 
Total 1-4 Family Residential Real Estate  3,775   3,754   125   4,149   4,073   201   3,237   3,203   196   3,485   3,450   202 
Multi-Family Residential Real Estate  55   56   1   -   -   -   51   52   4   53   53   4 
CRE Owner Occupied  2,336   1,875   85   3,250   2,767   132   2,291   1,831   96   2,362   1,894   102 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  1,304   1,234   16   385   308   2   414   417   25   1,618   1,479   108 
Agriculture Land  68   71   -   68   69   2   109   110   5   45   45   3 
Other CRE  844   424   7   926   502   3   1,116   698   44   1,144   722   42 
Total Commercial Real Estate  4,552   3,604   108   4,629   3,646   139   3,930   3,056   170   5,169   4,140   255 
Construction  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 
Commercial Working Capital  207   208   11   594   596   62   180   181   94   230   231   24 
Commercial Other  214   217   3   252   256   1   124   127   7   167   170   11 
Total Commercial  421   425   14   846   852   63   304   308   101   397   401   35 
Home Equity and Home Improvement  863   858   40   724   719   34   631   627   300   688   684   313 
Consumer Finance  16   16   -   12   12   -   18   17   1   4   4   - 
Total loans with an allowance recorded $9,682  $8,713  $288  $10,360  $9,302  $437  $8,171  $7,263  $772  $9,796  $8,732  $809 

 

* Presented gross of charge offs

 

 3234 

 

 

The following table presents the current balance of the aggregate amounts of non-performing assets, comprised of non-performing loans and real estate owned on the dates indicated:

 

 June 30,
2016
  December 31,
2015
  

March 31,

2017

  December 31,
 2016
 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
Non-accrual loans $16,423  $16,261  $15,057  $14,348 
Loans over 90 days past due and still accruing  -   -   -   - 
Total non-performing loans  16,423   16,261   15,057   14,348 
Real estate and other assets held for sale  1,079   1,321   705   455 
Total non-performing assets $17,502  $17,582  $15,762  $14,803 
Troubled debt restructuring, still accruing $9,648  $11,178  $9,771  $10,544 

 

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due and nonnon- accrual loans as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 by class of loans (In Thousands):

 

 Current  30-59 days  60-89 days  90+ days  Total
Past Due
  Total Non
Accrual
  Current  30-59 days  60-89 days  90+ days  Total Past
Due
  Total Non-
Accrual
 
Residential Owner Occupied $138,939  $54  $775  $401  $1,230  $1,437  $175,631  $95  $866  $333  $1,294  $1,579 
Residential Non Owner Occupied  66,218   199   220   344   763   1,268   99,595   50   284   312   646   1,175 
                        
Total 1-4 Family Residential Real Estate  205,157   253   995   745   1,993   2,705   275,226   145   1,150   645   1,940   2,754 
                        
Multi-Family Residential Real Estate  191,257   -   -   1,924   1,924   2,294   211,777   -   -   -   -   2,576 
                                                
CRE Owner Occupied  341,301   1,040   -   978   2,018   4,787   384,192   710   45   1,337   2,092   3,172 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  313,443   1,130   45   527   1,702   1,783   395,410   328   -   442   770   1,626 
Agriculture Land  101,893   -   -   28   28   896   135,544   210   -   855   1,065   1,582 
Other Commercial Real Estate  50,029   -   -   249   249   1,042   65,925   -   -   -   -   866 
                                                
Total Commercial Real Estate  806,666   2,170   3,890   1,782   3,997   8,508   981,071   1,248   45   2,634   3,927   7,246 
                                                
Construction  92,221   -   -   -   -   -   104,036   -   -   -   -   - 
                                                
Commercial Working Capital  187,734   1,534   69   9   1,612   503   225,276   55   49   -   104   1,005 
Commercial Other  239,092   812   -   631   1,443   1,727   278,789   1,455   142   326   1,923   497 
                                                
Total Commercial  426,826   2,346   69   640   3,055   2,230   504,065   1,510   191   326   2,027   1,502 
                                                
Home Equity and Improvement  116,557   536   115   14   665   678 
Home Equity/Home Improvement  132,993   173   42   398   613   875 
Consumer Finance  16,637   49   -   -   49   16   27,417   108   130   77   315   101 
                                                
Total Loans $1,855,321  $5,354  $1,224  $5,105  $11,683  $16,431  $2,236,585  $3,184  $1,558  $4,080  $8,822  $15,054 
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (included in the totals above) $3,830  $110  $45  $147  $302  $472 
Loans acquired in current year (included in totals above)
 $279,502  $820  $341  $1,130  $2,291  $1,476 

 

 3335 

 

 

The following table presents the aging of the recorded investment in past due and non accrualnon-accrual loans as of December 31, 20152016 by class of loans (In Thousands):

 

 Current  30-59 days  60-89 days  90+ days  Total
Past Due
  Total Non
Accrual
  Current  30-59 days  60-89 days  90+ days  Total Past
 Due
  Total Non-
Accrual
 
Residential Owner Occupied $138,974  $159  $673  $391  $1,223  $1,428  $139,015  $56  $842  $544  $1,442  $1,931 
Residential Non Owner Occupied  64,577   324   356   226   906   1,179   66,811   166   308   63   537   992 
                        
Total 1-4 Family Residential Real Estate  203,551   483   1,029   617   2,129   2,607   205,826   222   1,150   607   1,979   2,923 
                        
Multi-Family Residential Real Estate  165,671   -   -   2,024   2,024   2,417   197,197   -   -   -   -   2,637 
                                                
CRE Owner Occupied  322,940   772   1,218   1,266   3,256   4,141   340,233   79   -   1,396   1,475   3,098 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  304,166   -   106   538   644   1,229   338,724   81   16   426   523   1,808 
Agriculture Land  98,055   57   -   -   57   695   102,397   -   -   -   -   755 
Other Commercial Real Estate  53,494   -   -   315   315   1,364   62,415   -   -   249   249   1,292 
                                                
Total Commercial Real Estate  778,655   829   1,324   2,119   4,272   7,429   843,769   160   16   2,071   2,247   6,953 
                                                
Construction  96,845   -   -   -   -   -   89,244   -   -   -   -   - 
                                                
Commercial Working Capital  168,938   16   -   154   170   251   202,786   -   10   38   48   435 
Commercial Other  249,070   203   46   2,223   2,472   2,833   267,189   23   -   365   388   577 
                                                
Total Commercial  418,008   219   46   2,377   2,642   3,084   469,975   23   10   403   436   1,012 
                                                
Home Equity and Home Improvement  116,599   733   92   44   869   689   117,458   1,125   176   254   1,555   730 
Consumer Finance  16,216   27   3   24   54   36   16,452   85   69   78   232   91 
                                                
Total Loans $1,795,545  $2,291  $2,494  $7,205  $11,990  $16,262  $1,939,921  $1,615  $1,421  $3,413  $6,449  $14,346 

 

Troubled Debt Restructurings

 

As of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015,2016, the Company had a recorded investment in troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) of $15.2$15.5 million and $17.6$16.8 million, respectively. The Company allocated $262,000$688,000 and $335,000$809,000 of specific reserves to those loans at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015,2016, and has committed to lend additional amounts totaling up to $81,000$19,000 and $48,000$20,000 at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively.

 

The Company offers various types of concessions when modifying a loan, however, forgiveness of principal is rarely granted. Each TDR is uniquely designed to meet the specific needs of the borrower. Commercial and industrial loans modified in a TDR often involve temporary interest-only payments, term extensions, and converting revolving credit lines to term loans. Additional collateral or an additional guarantor is often requested when granting a concession. Commercial mortgage loans modified in a TDR often involve temporary interest-only payments, re-amortization of remaining debt in order to lower payments, and sometimes reducing the interest rate lower than the current market rate. Residential mortgage loans modified in a TDR are comprised of loans where monthly payments are lowered, either through interest rate reductions or principal only payments for a period of time, to accommodate the borrowers’ financial needs, interest is capitalized into principal, or the term and amortization are extended. Home equity modifications are made infrequently and usually involve providing an interest rate that is lower than the borrower would be able to obtain due to credit issues. All retail loans where the borrower is in bankruptcy are classified as TDRs regardless of whether or not a concession is made.

 

 3436 

 

 

Of the loans modified in a TDR, $5.6$5.7 million are on non-accrual status and partial charge-offs have in some cases been taken against the outstanding balance. Loans modified as a TDR may have the financial effect of increasing the allowance associated with the loan. If the loan is determined to be collateral dependent, the estimated fair value of the collateral, less any selling costs is used to determine if there is a need for a specific allowance or charge-off. If the loan is determined to be cash flow dependent, the allowance is measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s pre-modification effective interest rate.

 

The following table presents loans by class modified as troubled debt restructurings that occurred during the three and six month periods ending June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and June 30, 2015:March 31, 2016:

 

  Loans Modified as a TDR for the Three
Months Ended June 30, 2016
($ in thousands)
  Loans Modified as a TDR for the Six
Months Ended June 30, 2016
($ in thousands)
 
Troubled Debt Restructurings Number of
Loans
  Recorded Investment
(as of period end)
  Number of
Loans
  Recorded Investment
(as of period end)
 
1-4 Family Owner Occupied  4  $115   5  $124 
1-4 Family Non Owner Occupied  0   -   2   124 
Multi Family  1   55   1   55 
CRE Owner Occupied  0   -   0   - 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  2   671   2   671 
Agriculture Land  0   -   0   - 
Other CRE  0   -   0   - 
Commercial Working Capital  1   226   1   226 
Commercial Other  1   606   1   606 
Home Equity and Improvement  2   56   5   325 
Consumer Finance  1   6   3   9 
Total  12  $1,735   20  $2,140 

35

  

Loans Modified as a TDR for the
Three Months Ended March 31, 2017

($ in thousands)

 

Loans Modified as a TDR for the
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016

($ in thousands)

 
Troubled Debt
Restructurings
 Number of
Loans
 Recorded
Investment (as of
period end)
  Number of
Loans
  Recorded
Investment (as of
period end)
 
1-4 Family Owner Occupied 4 $100   1  $9 
1-4 Family Non Owner Occupied 2  84   2   127 
CRE Owner Occupied 1  119   0   - 
CRE Non Owner Occupied 0  -   0   - 
Agriculture Land 0  -   0   - 
Other CRE 0  -   0   - 
Commercial Working Capital 0  -   0   - 
Commercial Other 1  46   0   - 
Home Equity and Improvement 1  25   5   297 
Consumer Finance 2  15   2   5 
Total 11 $389   10  $438 

 

The loans described above decreased the ALLL by $29,000$19,000 in the three month period ending June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and $43,000 in the six month period ending June 30, 2016.

  Loans Modified as a TDR for the Three
Months Ended June 30, 2015
($ in thousands)
  Loans Modified as a TDR for the Six
Months Ended June 30, 2015
($ in thousands)
 
Troubled Debt Restructurings Number of
Loans
  Recorded Investment
(as of period end)
  Number of
Loans
  Recorded Investment
(as of period end)
 
1-4 Family Owner Occupied  1  $9   3  $226 
1-4 Family Non Owner Occupied  0   -   4   65 
CRE Owner Occupied  1   582   1   582 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  2   260   2   260 
Agriculture Land  3   1,555   3   1,555 
Other CRE  0   -   0   - 
Commercial Working Capital  2   526   2   526 
Commercial Other  1   57   1   57 
Home Equity and Improvement  4   268   7   326 
Consumer Finance  2   34   4   37 
Total  16  $3,291   27  $3,634 

The loans described above increased the allowance for loan lossALLL by $53,000$15,000 in the three month period ending June 30, 2015 and increased the allowance for loan loss by $116,000 in the six month period ending June 30, 2015.March 31, 2016.

 

Of the 20162017 modifications, nine4 were made TDRs due to the fact that the borrower has beenis in bankruptcy, one4 were made TDR due to terming out lines of credit, 2 were made TDR due to advancing money to a watch list credit, and 1 was made a TDR due to an interest only period, three were made TDRs due to advancing funds to a watchlist credit, three were to extendbecause the maturity of the loan, onecurrent debt was to term out a line of credit and five were made to refinance current debtrefinanced for payment relief.

 

The following table presentsThere were no loans by class modified as TDRs for which there was a payment default within twelve months following the modification during the threequarters ending March 31, 2017 and six month periods ended June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2015:March 31, 2016.

 

  Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
($ in thousands)
  Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
($ in thousands)
 
Troubled Debt Restructurings
That Subsequently Defaulted
 Number of
Loans
  Recorded Investment
(as of period end)
  Number of
Loans
  Recorded Investment
(as of period end)
 
1-4 Family Owner Occupied  0  $-   0  $- 
1-4 Family Non Owner Occupied  0   -   0   - 
CRE Owner Occupied  0   -   0   - 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  1   15   1   15 
Agriculture Land  0   -   0   - 
Other CRE  0   -   0   - 
Commercial Working Capital or Other  0   -   0   - 
Commercial Other  0   -   0   - 
Home Equity and Improvement  0   -   0   - 
Consumer Finance  0   -   0   - 
Total  1  $15   1  $15 

 3637 

 

The TDRs that subsequently defaulted described above had no effect on the allowance for loan losses for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2016.

  Three Months Ended June 30, 2015
($ in thousands)
  Six Months Ended June 30, 2015
($ in thousands)
 
Troubled Debt Restructurings
That Subsequently Defaulted
 Number of
Loans
  Recorded Investment
(as of period end)
  Number of
Loans
  Recorded Investment
(as of period end)
 
1-4 Family Owner Occupied  0  $-   0  $- 
1-4 Family Non Owner Occupied  1   104   1   104 
CRE Owner Occupied  0   -   0   - 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  0   -   0   - 
Agriculture Land  0   -   0   - 
Other CRE  0   -   0   - 
Commercial Working Capital or Other  0   -   0   - 
Commercial Other  0   -   0   - 
Home Equity and Improvement  1   22   1   22 
Consumer Finance  0   -   0   - 
Total  2  $126   2  $126 

The TDRs that subsequently defaulted described above had no effect on the allowance for loan losses for the three and six month period ended June 30, 2015.

The terms of certain other loans were modified during the period ending June 30, 2016 that did not meet the definition of a TDR. The modification of these loans involved a modification of the terms of a loan to borrowers who were not experiencing financial difficulties. A total of 140 loans were modified under this definition during the three month period ended June 30, 2016 and a total of 203 loans were modified under this definition during the six month period ended June 30, 2016.

 

In order to determine whether a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, an evaluation is performed on the probability that the borrower will be in payment default on any of its debt in the foreseeable future without the modification.

 

Credit Quality Indicators

 

Loans are categorized into risk categories based on relevant information about the ability of borrowers to service their debt such as: current financial information, historical payment experience, credit documentation, public information, and current economic trends, among other factors. Loans are analyzed individually by classifying the loans as to credit risk. This analysis includes all non-homogeneous loans, such as commercial and commercial real estate loans and certain homogenous mortgage, home equity and consumer loans. This analysis is performed on a quarterly basis. First Defiance uses the following definitions for risk ratings:

 

Special Mention.Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management's close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan or of the institution's credit position at some future date.

 

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

 

37

Doubtful.Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

 

Not Graded.Loans classified as not graded are generally smaller balance residential real estate, home equity and consumer installment loans which are originated primarily by using an automated underwriting system. These loans are monitored based on their delinquency status and are evaluated individually only if they are seriously delinquent.

 

Loans not meeting the criteria above that are analyzed individually as part of the above described process are considered to be pass rated loans. As of June 30,March 31, 2017, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows (In Thousands):

38

Class Pass  Special
Mention
  Substandard  Doubtful  Not
Graded
  Total 
1-4 Family Owner Occupied $7,502  $483  $1,943  $-  $166,998  $176,926 
1-4 Family Non Owner Occupied  89,432   2,287   3,575   -   4,946   100,240 
                         
Total 1-4 Family Real Estate  96,934   2,770   5,518   -   171,944   277,166 
                         
Multi-Family Residential Real Estate  207,071   837   3,756   -   113   211,777 
                         
CRE Owner Occupied  360,693   20,388   4,890   -   314   386,285 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  386,323   3,390   6,467   -   -   396,180 
Agriculture Land  128,428   2,731   5,450   -   -   136,609 
Other CRE  62,997   59   2,063   -   805   65,924 
                         
Total Commercial Real Estate  938,441   26,568   18,870   -   1,119   984,998 
                         
Construction  82,950   1,198   -   -   19,888   104,036 
                         
Commercial Working Capital  215,129   7,139   3,112   -   -   225,380 
Commercial Other  269,535   8,458   2,719   -   -   280,712 
                         
Total Commercial  484,664   15,597   5,831   -   -   506,092 
                         
Home Equity and Home Improvement  -   -   852   -   132,754   133,606 
Consumer Finance  -   -   177   -   27,555   27,732 
                         
Total Loans $1,810,060  $46,970  $35,004  $-  $353,373  $2,245,407 
                         
Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality (included in the totals above) $9  $1,173  $2,946   -  $4  $4,132 
                         
Loans acquired in current year (included in totals above) $223,594  $1,711  $5,393   -  $51,095  $281,793 

As of December 31, 2016, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows (In Thousands):

 

Class Pass  Special
Mention
  Substandard  Doubtful  Not
Graded
  Total 
1-4 Family Owner Occupied $5,350  $120  $2,080  $-  $132,619  $140,169 
1-4 Family Non Owner Occupied  56,808   1,259   3,973   -   4,941   66,981 
                         
Total 1-4 Family Real Estate  62,158   1,379   6,053   -   137,560   207,150 
                         
Multi-Family Residential Real Estate  186,747   1,909   4,409   -   116   193,181 
                         
CRE Owner Occupied  317,380   16,277   9,136   -   525   343,318 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  307,586   1,004   6,545   -   10   315,145 
Agriculture Land  99,447   487   1,986   -   -   101,920 
Other CRE  46,810   77   2,704   -   689   50,280 
                         
Total Commercial Real Estate  771,223   17,845   20,371   -   1,2244   810,663 
                         
Construction  66,812   4,250   -   -   21,159   92,221 
                         
Commercial Working Capital  176,926   9,816   2,604   -   -   189,346 
Commercial Other  231,192   6,094   3,249   -   -   240,535 
                         
Total Commercial  408,118   15,910   5,853   -   -   429,881 
                         
Home Equity and Home Improvement  -   -   662   -   116,560   117,222 
Consumer Finance  -   -   16   -   16,670   16,686 
                         
Total Loans $1,495,058  $41,293  $37,364  $-  $294,175  $1,867,890 

 3839

Class Pass  Special
Mention
  Substandard  Doubtful  Not
Graded
  Total 
Residential Owner Occupied $5,980  $402  $1,824  $-  $132,250  $140,456 
Residential Non Owner Occupied  58,041   1,394   3,480   -   4,434   67,349 
                         
Total 1-4 Family Real Estate  64,021   1,796   5,304   -   136,684   207,805 
                         
Multi-Family Residential Real Estate  192,369   862   3,852   -   114   197,197 
                         
CRE Owner Occupied  316,335   20,559   4,430   -   384   341,708 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  332,196   1,617   5,435   -   -   339,248 
Agriculture Land  98,039   2,355   2,002   -   -   102,396 
Other CRE  59,561   60   2,297   -   746   62,664 
                         
Total Commercial Real Estate  806,131   24,591   14,164   -   1,130   846,016 
                         
Construction  67,751   706   -   -   20,787   89,244 
                         
Commercial Working Capital  193,043   8,301   1,490   -   -   202,834 
Commercial Other  262,076   3,749   1,752   -   -   267,577 
                         
Total Commercial  455,119   12,050   3,242   -   -   470,411 
                         
Home Equity and Home Improvement  -   -   696   -   118,317   119,013 
Consumer Finance  -   -   90   -   16,594   16,684 
                         
Total Loans $1,585,391  $40,005  $27,348  $-  $293,626  $1,946,370 

The Company has purchased loans, for which there was, at acquisition, evidence of deterioration of credit quality since origination and it was probable, at acquisition, that all contractually required payments would not be collected. The outstanding balance of those loans is as follows (In Thousands):

  March 31, 2017 
1-4 Family Residential Real Estate $1,541 
Commercial Real Estate Loans  3,837 
Commercial  742 
Consumer  3 
Total Outstanding Balance $6,123 
Recorded Investment, net of allowance of $0 $4,132 

40 

 

 

Accretable yield, or income expected to be collected, is as follows

As

  2017 
Balance at January 1 $- 
New Loans Purchased  1,034 
Accretion of Income  - 
Reclassifications from Non-accretable Difference Charge-off of Accretable Yield  - 
Balance at March 31 $1,034 

For those purchased loans disclosed above, the Company did not increase the allowance for loan losses during the three months ended March 31, 2017. No allowances for loan losses were reversed during the same period.

Contractually required payments receivable of loans purchased with evidence of credit deterioration during the period ended March 31, 2017 are included in the table below. There were no such loans purchased during the year ended December 31, 2015, and based on the most recent analysis performed, the risk category of loans by class of loans is as follows2016. (In Thousands):

 

Class Pass  

Special

Mention

  Substandard  Doubtful  

Not

Graded

  Total 
                   
Residential Owner Occupied $5,828  $123  $2,427  $-  $131,820  $140,198 
Residential Non Owner Occupied  55,169   1,420   4,439   -   4,454   65,482 
                         
Total 1-4 Family Real Estate  60,997   1,543   6,866   -   136,274   205,680 
                         
Multi-Family Residential Real Estate  163,405   498   3,675   -   117   167,695 
                         
CRE Owner Occupied  297,856   17,896   9,730   -   714   326,196 
CRE Non Owner Occupied  293,057   2,143   9,595   -   15   304,810 
Agriculture Land  92,262   1,947   3,903   -   -   98,112 
Other CRE  47,109   469   5,739   -   492   53,809 
                         
Total Commercial Real Estate  730,284   22,455   28,967   -   1,221   782,927 
                         
Construction  76,152   2,159   -   -   18,534   96,845 
                         
Commercial Working Capital  163,071   2,497   3,540   -   -   169,108 
Commercial Other  243,308   2,706   5,528   -   -   251,542 
                         
Total Commercial  406,379   5,203   9,068   -   -   420,650 
                         
Home Equity and Home Improvement  -   -   689   -   116,779   117,468 
Consumer Finance  -   -   15   -   16,255   16,270 
                         
Total Loans $1,437,217  $31,858  $49,280  $-  $289,180  $1,807,535 
1-4 Family Residential Real Estate $1,720 
Commercial Real Estate  3,781 
Commercial  785 
Consumer  4 
Total $6,290 

Cash Flows Expected to be Collected at Acquisition $5,157 
Fair Value of Acquired Loans at Acquisition $4,123 

 

Foreclosure Proceedings

 

Consumer mortgage loans collateralized by residential real estate property that are in the process of foreclosure totaled $228,000$226,000 as of June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017.

 

 3941 

 

 

9. Mortgage Banking

9.Mortgage Banking

 

Net revenues from the sales and servicing of mortgage loans consisted of the following:

 

 

Three Months Ended

June 30,

 

Six Months Ended

June 30,

  

Three Months Ended

March 31,

 
 2016  2015  2016  2015  2017  2016 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
Gain from sale of mortgage loans $1,426  $1,246  $2,420  $2,531  $1,083  $994 
Mortgage loans servicing revenue (expense):                        
Mortgage loans servicing revenue  876   852   1,753   1,727   934   877 
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights  (434)  (446)  (745)  (857)  (312)  (311)
Mortgage servicing rights valuation adjustments  (104)  141   (125)  167   33   (21)
  338   547   883   1,037   655   545 
                        
Net revenue from sale and servicing of mortgage loans $1,764  $1,793  $3,303  $3,568  $1,738  $1,539 

 

The unpaid principal balance of residential mortgage loans serviced for third parties was $1.35$1.38 billion at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and $1.34$1.37 billion at December 31, 2015.2016.

 

Activity for capitalized mortgage servicing rights and the related valuation allowance follows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and 2015:2016:

 

 

Three Months Ended

June 30,

 

Six Months Ended

June 30,

 
 2016 2015 2016 2015  

March 31,

2017

  March 31,
2016
 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
Mortgage servicing assets:                        
Balance at beginning of period $9,879  $9,832  $9,893  $9,923  $10,117  $9,893 
Loans sold, servicing retained  461   486   758   806   356   297 
Amortization  (434)  (446)  (745)  (857)  (312)  (311)
Carrying value before valuation allowance at end of period  9,906   9,872   9,906   9,872   10,161   9,879 
                        
Valuation allowance:                        
Balance at beginning of period  (666)  (885)  (645)  (911)  (522)  (645)
Impairment recovery (charges)  (104)  141   (125)  167 
Impairment (expense) recovery  33   (21)
Balance at end of period  (770)  (744)  (770)  (744)  (489)  (666)
Net carrying value of MSRs at end of period $9,136  $9,128  $9,136  $9,128  $9,672  $9,213 
Fair value of MSRs at end of period $9,273  $9,574  $9,273  $9,574  $10,013  $9,463 

 

Amortization of mortgage servicing rights is computed based on payments and payoffs of the related mortgage loans serviced. Estimates of future amortization expense are not easily estimable.

 

The Company established an accrual for secondary market buy-back losses that resulted inactivity, a reversalliability of $9,000$51,000 and $14,000 in$79,000 was accrued at March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Expense (credit) recognized related to the second quarter of 2016accrual was ($28,000) and 2015, respectively. The Company reversed $68,000 and $72,000($59,000) in the first six monthsquarter of 20162017 and 2015,2016, respectively. The reversals are mainly due to no actual losses being recorded in the first six monthsquarter of 2017 and 2016, and 2015.respectively.

 

 4042 

 

10. Deposits

10.Deposits

 

A summary of deposit balances is as follows:

 

  

June 30,

2016

  

December 31,

2015

 
  (In Thousands) 
Non-interest-bearing checking accounts $442,811  $420,691 
Interest-bearing checking and money market accounts  805,550   767,201 
Savings deposits  240,316   219,655 
Retail certificates of deposit less than $250,000  399,494   403,902 
Retail certificates of deposit greater than $250,000  32,099   24,688 
  $1,920,270  $1,836,137 

11. Borrowings

  

March 31,

2017

  

December 31,

2016

 
  (In Thousands) 
Non-interest-bearing checking accounts $579,943  $487,663 
Interest-bearing checking and money market accounts  973,459   816,665 
Savings deposits  288,498   243,369 
Retail certificates of deposit less than $250,000  490,953   400,080 
Retail certificates of deposit greater than $250,000  40,936   33,851 
  $2,373,789  $1,981,628 
11.Borrowings

 

First Defiance’s debt, FHLB advances and junior subordinated debentures owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts are comprised of the following:

 

 

June 30,

2016

 

December 31,

2015

  

March 31,

2017

 

December 31,

2016

 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
FHLB Advances:                
Single maturity fixed rate advances $72,000  $47,000  $92,000  $92,000 
Putable advances  5,000   5,000   5,000   5,000 
Amortizable mortgage advances  7,425   7,902   8,104   6,943 
Total $84,425  $59,902  $105,104  $103,943 
                
Junior subordinated debentures owed to unconsolidated subsidiary trusts $36,083  $36,083  $36,083  $36,083 

 

The putable advance can be put back to the Company at the option of the FHLB on a quarterly basis. A $5.0 million putable advance with a weighted average rate of 2.35% was not yet callable by the FHLB at June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017. The call date for this advance is September 16, 2016June 12, 2017 and the maturity date is March 12, 2018. Putable advances are callable at the option of the FHLB on a quarterly basis.

43

 

In March 2007, the Company sponsored an affiliated trust, First Defiance Statutory Trust II (Trust Affiliate II) that issued $15 million of Guaranteed Capital Trust Securities (Trust Preferred Securities). In connection with this transaction, the Company issued $15.5 million of Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (Subordinated Debentures) to Trust Affiliate II. The Company formed Trust Affiliate II for the purpose of issuing Trust Preferred Securities to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the sale of these capital securities solely in Subordinated Debentures of the Company. The Subordinated Debentures held by Trust Affiliate II are the sole assets of that trust. The Company is not considered the primary beneficiary of this Trust (variable interest entity), therefore the trust is not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements, but rather the subordinated debentures are shown as a liability.Distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate II are payable quarterly at a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.5%. The Coupon rate payable on the Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate II was 2.15%2.65% as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and 2.01%2.46% as of December 31, 2015.2016.

41

 

The Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate II are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or part, upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures. The Company has entered into an agreement that fully and unconditionally guarantees the Trust Preferred Securities subject to the terms of the guarantee. The Trust Preferred Securities and Subordinated Debentures mature on June 15, 2037, but can be redeemed at the Company’s option at any time now.

 

The Company also sponsored an affiliated trust, First Defiance Statutory Trust I (Trust Affiliate I), that issued $20 million of Trust Preferred Securities in 2005. In connection with this transaction, the Company issued $20.6 million of Subordinated Debentures to Trust Affiliate I. Trust Affiliate I was formed for the purpose of issuing Trust Preferred Securities to third-party investors and investing the proceeds from the sale of these capital securities solely in Subordinated Debentures of the Company. The Junior Debentures held by Trust Affiliate I are the sole assets of the trust. The Company is not considered the primary beneficiary of this Trust (variable interest entity), therefore the trust is not consolidated in the Company’s financial statements, but rather the subordinated debentures are shown as a liability.Distributions on the Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate I are payable quarterly at a variable rate equal to the three-month LIBOR rate plus 1.38%. The Coupon rate payable on the Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate I was 2.03%2.53% and 1.89%2.34% on June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 20152016 respectively.

 

The Trust Preferred Securities issued by Trust Affiliate I are subject to mandatory redemption, in whole or in part, upon repayment of the Subordinated Debentures. The Company has entered into an agreement that fully and unconditionally guarantees the Trust Preferred Securities subject to the terms of the guarantee. The Trust Preferred Securities and Subordinated Debentures mature on December 15, 2035, but can be redeemed at the Company’s option at any time now.

 

The subordinated debentures may be included in Tier 1 capital (with certain limitations applicable) under current regulatory guidelines and interpretations.

 

Interest on both issues of Trust Preferred Securities may be deferred for a period of up to five years at the option of the issuer.

 

Repurchase Agreements.We utilize securities sold under agreements to repurchase to facilitate the needs of our customers and to facilitate secured short-term funding needs. Securities sold under agreements to repurchase are stated at the amount of cash received in connection with the transaction. We monitor levels on a continuous basis. We may be required to provide additional collateral based on the fair value of the underlying securities. Securities pledged as collateral under repurchase agreements are maintained with our safekeeping agent.

 

 4244 

 

 

The remaining contractual maturity of the securities sold under agreements to repurchase in the consolidated balance sheets as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 20152016 is presented in the following tables.

 

 

Overnight and

Continuous

 

Up to 30

Days

  30-90 Days  

Greater

than 90

Days

  Total  Overnight and
Continuous
  Up to 30
Days
  30-90 Days  Greater
than 90
Days
  Total 
 (In Thousands)    (In Thousands) 
At June 30, 2016                    
At March 31, 2017     
Repurchase agreements:                                        
Mortgage-backed securities – residential $26,289  $-  $-  $-  $26,289  $16,624  $-  $-  $-  $16,624 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  26,700   -   -   -   26,700   8,267   -   -   -   8,267 
Total borrowings $52,989  $-  $-  $-  $52,989  $24,891  $-  $-  $-  $24,891 
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for repurchase agreements                 $52,989                  $24,891 

 

 

Overnight and

Continuous

 

Up to 30

Days

  30-90 Days  

Greater

than 90

Days

  Total  Overnight and
Continuous
  Up to 30
Days
  30-90 Days  Greater
than 90
Days
  

 

 

Total

 
 (In Thousands)    (In Thousands) 
At December 31, 2015                    
At December 31, 2016     
Repurchase agreements:                                        
Mortgage-backed securities – residential $23,998  $-  $-  $-  $23,998  $21,222  $-  $-  $-  $21,222 
Collateralized mortgage obligations  33,190   -   -   -   33,190   10,594   -   -   -   10,594 
Total borrowings $57,188  $-  $-  $-  $57,188  $31,816  $-  $-  $-  $31,816 
Gross amount of recognized liabilities for repurchase agreements                 $57,188                  $31,816 

 

12. Commitments, Guarantees and Contingent Liabilities

12.Commitments, Guarantees and Contingent Liabilities

 

Loan commitments are made to accommodate the financial needs of First Federal’s customers; however, there are no long-term, fixed-rate loan commitments that result in market risk. Standby letters of credit commit the Company to make payments on behalf of customers when certain specified future events occur. They primarily are issued to facilitate customers’ trade transactions.

 

Both arrangements have credit risk, essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers, and are subject to the Company’s normal credit policies. Collateral (e.g., securities, receivables, inventory and equipment) is obtained based on Management’s credit assessment of the customer.

 

The Company’s maximum obligation to extend credit for loan commitments (unfunded loans and unused lines of credit) and standby letters of credit outstanding as of the periods stated below were as follows (In Thousands):

 

 June 30, 2016  December 31, 2015  March 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
 Fixed Rate  Variable Rate  Fixed Rate Variable Rate  Fixed Rate  Variable Rate  Fixed Rate Variable Rate 
Commitments to make loans $68,507  $88,569  $80,862  $76,253  $49,810  $125,148  $34,432  $106,356 
Unused lines of credit  38,718   353,874   31,991   323,171   25,487   420,597   14,384   400,542 
Standby letters of credit  -   19,159   -   19,632   -   6,719   -   9,668 
Total $107,225  $461,602  $112,853  $419,056  $75,297  $552,464  $48,816  $516,566 

45

 

Commitments to make loans are generally made for periods of 60 days or less.

In addition to the above commitments, First Defiance had commitments to sell $40.8$24.0 million and $19.9$22.5 million of loans to Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae, Federal Home Loan Bank of Cincinnati or BB&T Mortgage at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively.

 

4313.Income Taxes

 

13. Income Taxes

The Company and its subsidiaries are subject to U.S. federal income tax as well as income tax in the state of Indiana. The Company is no longer subject to examination by taxing authorities for years before 2011.2012. The Company currently operates primarily in the states of Ohio and Michigan, which tax financial institutions based on their equity rather than their income.As a result of adopting ASU 2016-09, a $31,000 credit to tax expense was recorded in the second quarter of 2016 and a $99,000 credit to tax expense was recorded in the first quarter of 2016.

 

14. Derivative Financial Instruments

14.Derivative Financial Instruments

 

Commitments to fund certain mortgage loans (interest rate locks) to be sold into the secondary market and forward commitments for the future delivery of mortgage loans to third party investors are considered derivatives. It is the Company’s practice to enter into forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans when interest rate lock commitments are entered into in order to economically hedge the effect of changes in interest rates resulting from its commitments to fund the loans. These mortgage banking derivatives are not designated in hedge relationships. First Federal had approximately $29.6$18.9 million and $14.9$14.1 million of interest rate lock commitments at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively. There were $40.8$24.0 million and $19.9$22.5 million of forward commitments for the future delivery of residential mortgage loans at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015,2016, respectively.

 

The fair value of these mortgage banking derivatives are reflected by a derivative asset recorded in other assets in the Consolidated Statements of Condition. The table below provides data about the carrying values of these derivative instruments:

 

 June30, 2016  December 31, 2015  March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 
 Assets (Liabilities)   Assets (Liabilities)    Assets (Liabilities)   Assets (Liabilities)   
     Derivative     Derivative      Derivative     Derivative 
 Carrying Carrying Net Carrying Carrying Carrying Net Carrying  Carrying Carrying Net Carrying Carrying Carrying Net Carrying 
 Value Value Value Value Value Value  Value Value Value Value Value Value 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments                                                
Mortgage Banking Derivatives $1,294  $(306) $988  $558  $-  $558  $598  $(42) $556  $491  $-  $491 

46

 

The table below provides data about the amount of gains and losses recognized in income on derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments:

 

  

Three Months Ended

June 30,

  

Six Months Ended

June 30,

 
  2016  2015  2016  2015 
  (In Thousands) 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments            
                 
Mortgage Banking Derivatives – Gain (Loss) $210  $(33) $430  $405 

44

  Three Months Ended
March 31,
 
  2017  2016 
  (In Thousands) 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments      
         
Mortgage Banking Derivatives – Gain (Loss) $65  $438 

 

The above amounts are included in mortgage banking income with gain on sale of mortgage loans.

 

15. Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

15.Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

 

The before and after tax amounts allocated to each component of other comprehensive income (loss) are presented in the table below. Reclassification adjustments related to securities available for sale are included in gains on sale or call of securities in the accompanying consolidated condensed statements of income.

 

  

Before Tax

Amount

  

Tax Expense

(Benefit)

  

Net of Tax

Amount

 
  (In Thousands) 
Three months ended June 30, 2016:            
Securities available for sale:            
Change in net unrealized gain/loss during the period $1,059  $(370) $689 
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income  (227)  79   (148)
Total other comprehensive income $832  $(291) $541 
             
Six months ended June 30, 2016:            
Securities available for sale:            
Change in net unrealized gain/loss during the period $2,509  $(878) $1,631 
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income  (358)  125   (233)
Total other comprehensive income $2,151  $(753) $1,398 

 

Before Tax

Amount

 

Tax Expense

(Benefit)

 

Net of Tax

Amount

  Before Tax
Amount
  Tax Expense
(Benefit)
  Net of Tax
Amount
 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
Three months ended June 30, 2015:            
Three months ended March 31, 2017:   
Securities available for sale:                        
Change in net unrealized gain/loss during the period $(3,839) $(1,344) $(2,495) $1,580  $(553) $1,027 
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income  -   -   -   -   -   - 
Total other comprehensive loss $(3,839) $(1,344) $(2,495) $1,580  $(553) $1,027 
                        
Six months ended June 30, 2015:            
Three months ended March 31, 2016:            
Securities available for sale:                        
Change in net unrealized gain/loss during the period $(2,337) $(817) $(1,520) $1,450  $(508) $942 
Reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income  -   -   -   (131)  46   (85)
Total other comprehensive loss $(2,337) $(817) $(1,520) $1,319  $(462) $857 

 

Activity in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, was as follows:

 

      Accumulated       Accumulated 
 Securities Post- Other  Securities Post- Other 
 Available retirement Comprehensive  Available retirement Comprehensive 
 For Sale Benefit Income  For Sale Benefit Income 
 (In Thousands) 
Balance January 1, 2017 $504  $(289) $215 
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications  1,027   -   1,027 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income  -   -   - 
            
Net other comprehensive income during period  1,027   -   1,027 
            
Balance March 31, 2017 $1,531  $(289) $1,242 
 (In Thousands)             
Balance January 1, 2016 $4,042  $(420) $3,622  $4,042  $(420) $3,622 
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications  1,631   -   1,631   942   -   942 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income  (233)  -   (233)  (85)  -   (85)
                        
Net other comprehensive income during period  1,398   -   1,398   857   -   857 
                        
Balance June 30, 2016 $5,440  $(420) $5,020 
            
Balance January 1, 2015 $4,697  $(583) $4,114 
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications  (1,520)  -   (1,520)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income  -   -   - 
            
Net other comprehensive income during period  (1,520)  -   (1,520)
            
Balance June 30, 2015 $3,177  $(583) $2,594 
Balance March 31, 2016 $4,899  $(420) $4,479 

 

 4547 

 

16. Affordable Housing Projects Tax Credit Partnership

16.Affordable Housing Projects Tax Credit Partnership

 

The Company makes certain equity investments in various limited partnerships that sponsor affordable housing projects utilizing the Low Income Housing Tax Credit (“LIHTC”) pursuant to Section 42 of the Internal Revenue Code. The purpose of these investments is to achieve a satisfactory return on capital, to facilitate the sale of affordable housing product offerings, and to assist in achieving goals associated with the Community Reinvestment Act. The primary activities of the limited partnerships include the identification, development, and operation of multi-family housing that is leased to qualifying residential tenants. Generally, these types of investments are funded through a combination of debt and equity.

 

The Company is a limited partner in each LIHTC Partnership. A separate unrelated third party is the general partner. Each limited partnership is managed by the general partner, who exercises full control over the affairs of the limited partnership. The general partner has all the rights, powers and authority granted or permitted to be granted to a general partner of a limited partnership. Duties entrusted to the general partner of each limited partnership include, but are not limited to: investment in operating companies, company expenditures, investment of excess funds, borrowing funds, employment of agents, disposition of fund property, prepayment and refinancing of liabilities, votes and consents, contract authority, disbursement of funds, accounting methods, tax elections, bank accounts, insurance, litigation, cash reserve, and use of working capital reserve funds. Except for limited rights granted to consent to certain transactions, the limited partner(s) may not participate in the operation, management, or control of the limited partnership’s business, transact any business in the limited partnership’s name or have any power to sign documents for or otherwise bind the limited partnership. In addition, the general partner may only be removed by the limited partner(s) in the event the general partner fails to comply with the terms of the agreement or is negligent in performing its duties.

 

The general partner of each limited partnership has both the power to direct the activities which most significantly affect the performance of each partnership and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the entities. Therefore, the Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary of any LIHTC partnership. In January of 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-01“Accounting for Investments in Qualified Affordable Housing Projects.” The pronouncement permitted reporting entities to make an accounting policy election to account for these investments using the proportional amortization method if certain conditions exist. Under the proportional amortization method, an entity amortizes the initial cost of the investment in proportion to the tax credits and other tax benefits received, and will recognize the net investment performance in the income statement as a component of income tax expense (benefit). The Company elected to early adopt ASU 2014-01 in January 2014. All of the Company’s investments are accounted for underutilized the proportional amortization method as there were no investments held prior to Januaryfor all of 2014.its instruments. As of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 20152016 the Company had $7.1$6.6 million and $4.3$6.8 million in qualified investments recorded in other assets and $4.8$4.3 million and $2.4$4.3 million in unfunded commitments recorded in other liabilities, respectively.

 

 4648 

 

 

Unfunded Commitments

 

As of June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, the expected payments for unfunded affordable housing commitments were as follows:

 

(dollars in thousands) Amount  Amount 
2016 $1,261 
2017  1,143  $1,897 
2018  1,137   1,137 
2019  308   307 
2020  179   179 
2021  160 
Thereafter  778   615 
Total Unfunded Commitments $4,806  $4,295 

 

The following table presents tax credits and other tax benefits recognized and amortization expense related to affordable housing for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and 2015.2016.

 

  Three Months Ended June 30, 
(dollars in thousands) 2016  2015 
Proportional Amortization Method        
Tax credits and other tax benefits recognized $157  $118 
Amortization expense in federal income taxes  119   89 

 Six Months Ended June 30,  Three Months Ended March
31,
 
(dollars in thousands) 2016  2015  2017 2016 
Proportional Amortization Method                
Tax credits and other tax benefits recognized $314  $236  $211  $157 
Amortization expense in federal income taxes  238   179   165   119 

 

There were no impairment losses of LIHTC investments for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and 2015.2016.

 

 4749 

 

17.Business Combinations

Effective February 24, 2017, the Company acquired Commercial Bancshares, Inc. (“Commercial Bancshares”) and its subsidiary, The Commercial Savings Bank (“CSB”), pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“merger agreement”), dated August 23, 2016. The acquisition was accomplished by the merger of Commercial Bancshares into First Defiance, immediately followed by the merger of CSB into First Defiance’s banking subsidiary, First Federal. CSB operated 7 full-service banking offices in northwest and north central, Ohio and 1 commercial loan production office in central Ohio. Commercial Bancshares’ consolidated assets and equity (unaudited) as of February 24, 2017 totaled $348.4 million and $37.5 million, respectively. The Company accounted for the transaction under the acquisition method of accounting which means that the acquired assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value at the date of acquisition. The fair value estimates included in these financial statements are based on preliminary valuations. The Company does not expect material variances from these estimates and expects that final valuation estimates will be completed during the year ending December 31, 2017.

In accordance with ASC 805, the Company expensed approximately $3.6 million of direct acquisition costs, of which $2.8 million was to settle employment and benefit agreements and for personnel expenses related to operating the new Commercial Bancshare locations. The Company recorded $29.0 million of goodwill and $4.9 million of intangible assets in the first quarter of 2017. Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising from net assets acquired that are not individually identified and separately recognized and is attributable to synergies expected to be derived from the combination of the two entities. The acquisition was consistent with the Company’s strategy to enhance and expand its presence in northwestern and north central Ohio. The acquisition offers the Company the opportunity to increase profitability by introducing existing products and services to the acquired customer base as well as add new customers in the expanded market area. The intangible assets are related to core deposits and are being amortized over 10 years on an accelerated basis. For tax purposes, goodwill totaling $29.0 million is non-deductible but will be evaluated annually for impairment. The following table summarizes the fair value of the total consideration transferred as part of the Commercial Bancshares acquisition as well as the fair value of identifiable assets and liabilities assumed as of the effective date of the transaction.

  February 24, 2017 
  (In Thousands) 
    
Cash Consideration $12,340 
Equity – Dollar Value of Issued Shares  56,532 
Fair Value of Total Consideration Transferred  68,872 
     
Recognized Amounts of Identifiable Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed:    
Cash and Cash Equivalents  35,411 
Federal Funds Sold  2,769 
Securities  4,338 
Loans  284,867 
FHLB Stock of Cincinnati and Other Stock  2,194 
Office Properties and Equipment  5,455 
Intangible Assets  4,900 
Bank-Owned Life Insurance  8,168 
Accrued Interest Receivable and Other Assets  (3,606)
Deposits – Non-Interest Bearing  (56,061)
Deposits – Interest Bearing  (251,931)
Advances from FHLB  (1,403)
Accrued Interest Payable and Other Liabilities  (2,411)
Total Identifiable Net Assets  39,902 
     
Goodwill $28,970 

50

Under the terms of the merger agreement, Commercial Bancshares common shareholders had the opportunity to elect to receive 1.1808 shares of common stock of the Company or cash in the amount of $51.00 for each share of Commercial Bancshares common stock, subject to adjustment as provided for in the merger agreement. Total consideration for Commercial Bancshares common shares outstanding was paid 80% in Company stock and 20% in cash. The Company issued 1,139,502 shares of its common stock and paid $12.3 million in cash to the former shareholders of Commercial Bancshares.

The following table presents unaudited pro forma information as if the acquisition had occurred on January 1, 2016 after giving effect to certain adjustments. The unaudited pro forma information for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and March 31, 2016 includes adjustments for interest income on loans and securities acquired, amortization of intangibles arising from the transaction, interest expense on deposits and borrowings acquired, and the related income tax effects. The unaudited pro forma financial information is not necessarily indicative of the results of operations that would have occurred had the transaction been effected on the assumed date.

  Pro Forma Three  Pro Forma Three 
  Months Ended  Months Ended 
  March 31, 2017  March 31, 2016 
  (In Thousands) 
       
Net Interest Income $23,837  $22,798 
Provision for Loan Losses  55   386 
Non-Interest Income  10,828   9,121 
Non-Interest Expense  21,234   20,103 
Income Before Income Taxes  13,376   11,430 
Income Tax Expense  5,141   3,413 
Net Income $8,235  $8,017 
Diluted Earnings Per Share $0.81  $0.79 

The above pro forma financial information includes approximately $123,000 of net income related to the operations of Commercial Bancshares during the first quarter of 2017. The above pro forma financial information related to 2017 excludes non-recurring merger costs that totaled $3.6 million on a pre-tax basis. Under acquisition accounting treatment, loans are recorded at fair value which includes a credit risk component, and therefore the provision for loan losses recognized during the first quarter of 2016 was presumed to not be necessary.

51

Subsequent Event

On April 13, 2017, First Defiance and Corporate One Benefits Agency, Inc. (“Corporate One”) jointly announced the acquisition of Corporate One’s business by First Defiance. The total purchase price paid in cash is made up of the following: $6.5 million was paid at closing, $500,000 is due in July 2018, and $2.3 million at the end of a three-year earn-out based on performance of the operations of Corporate One, for a total estimated purchase price of $9.3 million. The fair value estimates are currently being evaluated and will be completed during the second quarter of 2017. Corporate One will be part of First Insurance. Corporate One is a full-service employee benefits consulting organization founded in 1996 with offices located in Archbold, Findlay, Fostoria and Tiffin, Ohio. Corporate One consults employers to better manage their employee benefit programs to effectively lead them into the future. It is anticipated that the transaction will enhance employee benefit offerings and expand First Insurance’s presence into adjacent markets in northwest Ohio.

 

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

 

Forward-Looking Information

 

Certain statements contained in this quarterly report are not statements of historical facts, including but not limited to statements that can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “anticipate”, or “continue” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (“Exchange Act”), as amended. Actual results could differ materially from those indicated in such statements due to risks, uncertainties and changes with respect to a variety of market and other factors. The Company assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Non-GAAP Financial Measures

This document contains GAAP financial measures and certain non-GAAP financial measures which are presented as management believes they are helpful in understanding the Company’s results of operations or financial position. Fully taxable-equivalent (“FTE”) is an adjustment to net interest income to reflect tax-exempt income on an equivalent before-tax basis. The following tables present a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures to their respective GAAP measures at March 31, 2017 and 2016.

52

Non-GAAP Financial Measures – Net Interest Income on an
FTE basis, Net Interest Margin and Efficiency Ratio
      
($ in Thousands) March 31,
2017
  March 31,
2016
 
Net interest income (GAAP) $21,645  $19,188 
Add:  FTE adjustment  469   475 
Net interest income on a FTE basis (1) $22,114  $19,663 
Noninterest income – less securities gains/losses (2) $10,549  $8,505 
Noninterest expense (3)  23,142   17,274 
Average interest-earning assets net of average unrealized gains/losses on securities(4)  2,353,930   2,080,914 
Average interest-earning assets  2,355,544   2,088,582 
Average unrealized gains/losses on securities  1,614   7,668 
         
Ratios:        
Net interest margin (1) / (4)  3.81%  3.80%
Efficiency ratio (3) / (1) + (2)  70.85%  61.32%

Critical Accounting Policies

First Defiance has established various accounting policies which govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States in the preparation of its financial statements. The significant accounting policies of First Defiance are described in the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K. Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by management, which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities; management considers such accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. Those policies which are identified and discussed in detail in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K include the Allowance for Loan Losses, Goodwill, and the Valuation of Mortgage Servicing Rights. There have been no material changes in assumptions or judgments relative to those critical policies during the first three months of 2017.

 

General

 

First Defiance is a unitary thrift holding company that conducts business through its wholly owned subsidiaries, First Federal, First Insurance and First Defiance Risk Management.

 

First Federal is a federally chartered stock savings bank that provides financial services to communities based in northwest and central Ohio, northeast Indiana, and southeastern Michigan where it operates 3443 full service banking centers in twelve northwest Ohio counties, one northeast Indiana county, and one southeastern Michigan county.centers. First Federal operates one loan production office in one central Ohio county.Ohio.

 

First Federal provides a broad range of financial services including checking accounts, savings accounts, certificates of deposit, real estate mortgage loans, commercial loans, consumer loans, home equity loans and trust and wealth management services through its extensive branch network.

 

53

First Insurance sells a variety of property and casualty, group health and life and individual health and life insurance products. First Insurance is an insurance agency that does business in the Defiance, Bryan, Bowling Green, Lima, Maumee and Oregon, Ohio areas. On April 13, 2017, First Defiance acquired the business of Corporate One. Corporate One will be part of First Insurance. Corporate One is a full-service employee benefits consulting organization founded in 1996 with offices located in Archbold, Findlay, Fostoria and Tiffin, Ohio. Corporate One consults employers to better manage their employee benefit programs to effectively lead them into the future. The transaction is expected to enhance employee benefit offerings and expand First Insurance’s presence into adjacent markets in northwest Ohio.

 

First Defiance Risk Management is a wholly owned insurance company subsidiary of the Company that insures the Company and its subsidiaries against certain risks unique to the operations of the Company and for which insurance may not be currently available or economically feasible in today’s insurance marketplace. First Defiance Risk Management pools resources with several other similar insurance company subsidiaries of financial institutions to spread a limited amount of risk among themselves.

 

Impact of LegislationRegulation- OverFirst Defiance and First Federal are subject to regulation, examination and oversight by the last several years, Congress and the U.S. DepartmentOffice of the Treasury have enacted legislationComptroller of the Currency (“OCC”) and taken actions to address the disruptions in the financial system, declines in the housing market, and the overall regulation of financial institutions and the financial system. In this regard, the Dodd-Frank Act includes provisions affecting large and small financial institutions alike, including several provisions that profoundly affect the regulation of community banks, thrifts, and bank and thrift holding companies, such as First Defiance. The Dodd-Frank Act relaxed rules regarding interstate branching, allow financial institutions to pay interest on business checking accounts, changed the scope of federal deposit insurance coverage, imposed new capital requirements on bank and thrift holding companies, and imposed limits on debit card interchange fees charged by issuer banks (commonly known as the Durbin Amendment).

48

The Dodd-Frank Act also established the CFPB as an independent bureau within the Federal Reserve which has broad authorityBoard (“Federal Reserve”). Because the FDIC insures First Federal’s deposits, First Federal is also subject to regulateexamination and regulation by the FDIC. In addition, First Federal is subject to regulation and examination by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (the “CFPB”) established by the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank Act”). First Defiance and First Federal must file periodic reports with the Federal Reserve and the OCC and examinations are conducted periodically by the Federal Reserve, OCC and the FDIC to determine whether First Defiance and First Federal are in compliance with various regulatory requirements and are operating in a safe and sound manner. First Federal is subject to various consumer financial productsprotection and servicesfair lending laws. These laws govern, among other things, truth-in-lending disclosure, equal credit opportunity, and, entities offeringin the case of First Federal, fair credit reporting and community reinvestment. Failure to abide by federal laws and regulations governing community reinvestment could limit the ability of First Federal to open a new branch or engage in a merger transaction. Community reinvestment regulations evaluate how well and to what extent First Federal lends and invests in its designated service area, with particular emphasis on low-to-moderate income communities and borrowers in such products and services, including banks.areas.

 

The CFPB has indicated that mortgage lending is an area of supervisory focus and that it will concentrate its examination and rulemaking efforts on the variety of mortgage-related topics required under the Dodd-Frank Act, including steering consumers to less-favorable products, discrimination, abusive or unfair lending practices, predatory lending, origination disclosures, minimum mortgage underwriting standards, mortgage loan originator compensation, and servicing practices. The CFPB has published numerous final regulations impacting the mortgage industry, including rules related to ability-to-pay, mortgage servicing, and mortgage loan originator compensation and more regulations are anticipated. First Defiance cannot predict the content of the final CFPBis also subject to various Ohio laws which restrict takeover bids, tender offers and other federal agency regulations or the impact they mightcontrol-share acquisitions involving public companies which have on First Defiance’s financial results. The CFPB’s authority over mortgage lending, and its authoritysignificant ties to change regulations adopted in the past by other regulators, or to rescind or ignore past regulatory guidance, could increase First Defiance’s compliance costs and litigation exposure.Ohio.

 

Regulatory Capital RequirementsThe federal banking regulators have adopted risk-based capital guidelines for financial institutions and their holding companies, designed to absorb losses. The guidelines provide a systematic analytical framework, which makes regulatory capital requirements sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banking organizations, takes off-balance sheet exposures expressly into account in evaluating capital adequacy and minimizes disincentives to holding liquid, low-risk assets. Capital levels as measured by these standards are also used to categorize financial institutions for purposes of certain prompt corrective action regulatory provisions.

 

In July 2013, the United States banking regulators issued final (or, in the case of the FDIC, interim final) new capital rules applicable to smaller banking organizations which also implement certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act (the “Basel III Capital Rules”). Community banking organizations, including First Defiance and First Federal, began transitioning to the new rules on January 1, 2015.Act. The new minimum capital requirements became effective on January 1, 2015, whereasand include a new capital conservation buffer and deductions from common equity capital phase in from January 1, 2016, through January 1, 2019, and most deductions from common equity tier 1 capital will phase in from January 1, 2015, through January 1, 2019.

54

 

The new rules include (a) a new common equity tier 1 (“CET1”) capital ratio of at least 4.5%, (b) a Tier 1 capital ratio of at least 6.0%, rather than the former 4.0%, (c) a minimum total capital ratio that remains at 8.0%, and (d) a minimum leverage ratio of 4%.

 

Common equity for the CET1common equity tier 1 capital ratio includes common stock (plus related surplus) and retained earnings, plus limited amounts of minority interests in the form of common stock, less the majority of certain regulatory deductions.

 

49

Tier 1 capital includes common equity as defined for the CET1common equity tier 1 capital ratio, plus certain non-cumulative preferred stock and related surplus, cumulative preferred stock and related surplus and trust preferred securities that have been grandfathered (but which are not permitted going forward), and limited amounts of minority interests in the form of additional Tier 1 capital instruments, less certain deductions.

 

Tier 2 capital, which can be included in the total capital ratio, includes certain capital instruments (such as subordinated debt) and limited amounts of the allowance for loan and lease losses, subject to new eligibility criteria, less applicable deductions.

 

The deductions from CET1common equity tier 1 capital include goodwill and other intangibles, certain deferred tax assets, mortgage-servicing assets above certain levels, gains on sale in connection with a securitization, investments in a banking organization’s own capital instruments and investments in the capital of unconsolidated financial institutions (above certain levels). The deductions phase in from 2015 through 2019..

 

Under the guidelines, capital is compared to the relative risk related to the balance sheet. To derive the risk included in the balance sheet, one of several risk weights is applied to different balance sheet and off-balance sheet assets, primarily based on the relative credit risk of the counterparty. The capital amounts and classification are also subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

 

The new rules also place restrictions on the payment of capital distributions, including dividends, and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers if the company does not hold a capital conservation buffer of greater than 2.5% composed of CET1common equity tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements, or if its eligible retained income is negative in that quarter and its capital conservation buffer ratio was less than 2.5% at the beginning of the quarter. The capital conservation buffer phases in starting onfrom January 1, 2016 until January 1, 2019. It was 1.25% at .625%January 1, 2017.

Deposit Insurance- Substantially all of the deposits of First Federal are insured up to applicable limits by the Deposit Insurance Fund of the FDIC, and First Federal is assessed deposit insurance premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund. Insurance premiums for each insured institution are determined based upon the institution’s capital level and supervisory rating provided to the FDIC by the institution’s primary federal regulator and other information deemed by the FDIC to be relevant to the risk posed to the Deposit Insurance Fund by the institution. The assessment rate is then applied to the amount of the institution’s deposits to determine the institution’s insurance premium.

55

The deposit insurance assessment base is average assets less average tangible equity. The FDIC set a target size for the Deposit Insurance Fund at 2% of insured deposits and a lower assessment rate schedule when the fund reaches 1.15% and, in lieu of dividends, the FDIC rule provides for a lower rate schedule when the reserve ratio reaches 2% and 2.5%. On June 30, 2016, the Deposit Insurance Fund surpassed its target of 1.15%, decreasing the assessment base based on the final rules approved by the FDIC Board of Directors on February 7, 2011, and April 26, 2016. The implementation of Basel III did not have a material impact onchange to the assessment base and assessment rates, as well as the Deposit Insurance Fund restoration time frame, has lowered First Defiance’s deposit insurance assessment.

In addition, the FDIC has proposed changing the deposit insurance premium assessment method for banks with less than $10 billion in assets that have been insured by the FDIC for at least five years. The proposed changes would revise the financial ratios method so that it would be based on a statistical model estimating the probability of failure of a bank over three years; update the financial measures used in the financial ratios method consistent with the statistical model; and eliminate risk categories for established small banks and using the financial ratios method to determine assessment rates for all such banks (subject to minimum or maximum initial assessment rates based upon a bank’s composite examination rating).

As insurer, the FDIC is authorized to conduct examinations of, and to require reporting by, federally-insured institutions. It also may prohibit any federally-insured institution from engaging in any activity the FDIC determines by regulation or order to pose a serious threat to the Deposit Insurance Fund. The FDIC also has the authority to take enforcement actions against insured institutions. Insurance of deposits may be terminated by the FDIC upon a finding that the institution has engaged or is engaging in unsafe and unsound practices, is in an unsafe or unsound condition to continue operations or has violated any applicable law, regulation, rule, order or condition imposed by the FDIC or written agreement entered into with the FDIC. The management of First Federal’s capital ratios.Federal does not know of any practice, condition or violation that might lead to termination of deposit insurance.

 

Business Strategy- First Defiance’s primary objective is to be a high-performing community banking organization, well regarded in its market areas. First Defiance accomplishes this through emphasis on local decision making and empowering its employees with tools and knowledge to serve its customers’ needs. First Defiance believes in a “Customer First” philosophy that is strengthened by its Trusted Advisor initiative. First Defiance also has a tagline of “Better Together” as an indication of its commitment to local, responsive, personalized service. First Defiance believes this strategy results in greater customer loyalty and profitability through core relationships. First Defiance is focused on diversification of revenue sources and increased market penetration in areas where the growth potential exists for a balance between acquisition and organic growth. The primary elements of First Defiance’s business strategy are commercial banking, consumer banking, including the origination and sale of single-family residential loans, enhancement of fee income, wealth management and insurance sales, each united by a strong customer service culture throughout the organization.

 

 5056 

 

 

Commercial and Commercial Real Estate Lending -Commercial and commercial real estate lending have been an ongoing focus and a major component of First Federal’s success. First Federal provides primarily commercial real estate and commercial business loans with an emphasis on owner- occupied commercial real estate and commercial business lending, including a focus on the deposit balances that accompany these relationships. First Federal’s client base tends to be small to middle market customers with annual gross revenues generally between $1 million and $50 million. First Federal’s focus is also on securing multiple guarantors in addition to collateral where possible. These customers require First Federal to have a high degree of knowledge and understanding of their business in order to provide them with solutions to their financial needs. First Federal’s “Customer First” philosophy and culture complements this need of its clients. First Federal believes this personal service model differentiates First Federal from its competitors, particularly the larger regional institutions. First Federal offers a wide variety of products to support commercial clients including remote deposit capture and other cash management services. First Federal also believes that the small business customer is a strong market for First Federal. First Federal participates in many of the Small Business Administration lending programs and implemented a program in 2014 targeting the small business customer. Maintaining a diversified portfolio with an emphasis on monitoring industry concentrations and reacting to changes in the credit characteristics of industries is an ongoing focus.

 

Consumer Banking -First Federal offers customers a full range of deposit and investment products including demand, checking, money market, certificates of deposits, Certificate of Deposit Account Registry Service (“CDARS”) and savings accounts. First Federal offers a full range of investment products through the wealth management department and a wide variety of consumer loan products, including residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, and installment loans. First Federal also offers online banking services, which include mobile banking and online bill pay.

 

Fee Income Development - Generation of fee income and the diversification of revenue sources are accomplished through the mortgage banking operation, First Insurance and the wealth management department as First Defiance seeks to reduce reliance on retail transaction fee income.

 

Deposit Growth - First Federal’s focus has been to grow core deposits with an emphasis on total relationship banking with both our retail and commercial customers. First Federal has initiated a pricing strategy that considers the whole relationship of the customer. First Federal will continue to focus on increasing its market share in the communities it serves by providing quality products with extraordinary customer service, business development strategies and branch expansion. First Federal will look to grow its footprint in areas believed to further complement its overall market share and complement its strategy of being a high-performing community bank.

 

Asset Quality -Maintaining a strong credit culture is of the utmost importance to First Federal. First Federal has maintained a strong credit approval and review process that has allowed the Company to maintain a credit quality standard that balances the return with the risks of industry concentrations and loan types. First Federal is primarily a collateral lender with an emphasis on cash flow performance, while obtaining additional support from personal guarantees and secondary sources of repayment. First Federal has directed its attention to loan types and markets that it knows well and in which it has historically been successful. First Federal strives to have loan relationships that are well diversified in both size and industry, and monitors the overall trends in the portfolio to maintain its industry and loan type concentration targets. First Federal maintains a problem loan remediation process that focuses on detection and resolution. First Federal maintains a strong process of internal control that subjects the loan portfolio to periodic internal reviews as well as independent third-party loan review.

 

 5157 

 

 

Expansion Opportunities - First Defiance believes it is well positioned to take advantage of acquisitions or other business opportunities in its market areas. First Defiance believes it has a track record of successfully accomplishing both acquisitions and de novo branching in its market area. This track record puts the Company in a solid position to enter or expand its business. First Defiance will continue to be disciplined as well as opportunistic in its approach to future acquisitions and de novo branching with a focus on its primary geographic market area, which it knows well, and has been competing in for a long period of time, as well as surrounding market areas.

 

Investments - First Defiance invests in U.S. Treasury and federal government agency obligations, obligations of municipal and other political subdivisions, mortgage-backed securities which are issued by federal agencies, corporate bonds, and collateralized mortgage obligations ("CMOs") and real estate mortgage investment conduits ("REMICs"). Management determines the appropriate classification of all such securities at the time of purchase in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 320.

 

Securities are classified as held-to-maturity when First Defiance has the positive intent and ability to hold the security to maturity. Held-to-maturity securities are stated at amortized cost and had a recorded value of $198,000$771,000 at June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017. Securities not classified as held-to-maturity are classified as available-for-sale, which are stated at fair value and had a recorded value of $228.0$260.6 million at June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017. The available-for-sale portfolio consists of obligations of U.S. Government corporations and agencies ($3.04.0 million), certain municipal obligations ($85.295.1 million), CMOs/REMICs ($67.5 million), corporate bonds ($11.013.1 million), and mortgage backed securities ($61.380.9 million).

 

In accordance with ASC Topic 320, declines in the fair value of held-to-maturity and available-for-sale securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary are reflected in earnings as realized losses to the extent the impairment is related to credit losses. The amount of the impairment related to other factors is recognized in other comprehensive income.

 

Lending - In order to properly assess the collateral dependent loans included in its loan portfolio, the Company has established policies regarding the monitoring of the collateral underlying such loans. The Company requires an appraisal that is less than one year old for all new collateral dependent real estate loans, and all renewed collateral dependent real estate loans where significant new money is extended. The appraisal process is handled by the Credit Department, which selects the appraiser and orders the appraisal. First Defiance’s loan policy prohibits the account officer from talking or communicating with the appraiser to insure that the appraiser is not influenced by the account officer in any way in making their determination of value.

 

First Federal generally does not require updated appraisals for performing loans unless significant new money is requested by the borrower.

 

52

When a collateral dependent loan is downgraded to classified status, First Federal reviews the most current appraisal on file and, if necessary, based on First Federal’s assessment of the appraisal, such as age, market, etc.,etc, First Federal will discount this amount to a more appropriate current value based on inputs from lenders and realtors. This amount may then be discounted further by First Federal’s estimation of the carrying and selling costs. In most instances, if the appraisal is more than twelve to fifteen months old, we may require a new appraisal. Finally, First Federal assesses whether there is any collateral short fall, taking into consideration guarantor support and liquidity, and determines if a charge off is necessary.

58

 

When a collateral dependent loan moves to non-performing status, First Federal generally gets a new third party appraisal and charges the loan down appropriately based upon the new appraisal and an estimate of costs to liquidate the collateral. All properties that are moved into the Other Real Estate Owned (“OREO”) category are supported by current appraisals, and the OREO is carried at the lower of cost or fair value, which is determined based on appraised value less First Federal’s estimate of the liquidation costs.

 

First Federal does not adjust any appraisals upward without written documentation of this valuation change from the appraiser. When setting reserves and charge offs on classified loans, appraisal values may be discounted downward based upon First Federal’s experience with liquidating similar properties.

 

All loans over 90 days past due and/or on non-accrual are classified as non-performing loans. Non-performing status automatically occurs in the month in which the 90 day delinquency occurs.

 

As stated above, once a collateral dependent loan is identified as non-performing, First Federal generally gets an appraisal.

 

Appraisals are received within approximately 60 days after they are requested. The First Federal Loan Loss Reserve Committee reviews the amount of each new appraisal and makes any necessary charge off decisions at its meeting prior to the end of each quarter.

 

Any partially charged-off collateral dependent loans are considered non-performing, and as such, would need to show an extended period of time with satisfactory payment performance as well as cash flow coverage capability supported by current financial statements before First Federal will consider an upgrade to performing status. First Federal may consider moving the loan to accruing status after approximately six months of satisfactory payment performance.

 

For loans where First Federal determines that an updated appraisal is not necessary, other means are used to verify the value of the real estate, such as recent sales of similar properties on which First Federal had loans as well as calls to appraisers, brokers, realtors and investors. First Federal monitors and tracks its loan to value quarterly to determine accuracy and any necessary charge offs. Based on these results, changes may occur in the processes used.

 

Loan modifications constitute a TDR if First Federal for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower’s financial difficulties grants a concession to the borrower that it would not otherwise consider. For loans that are considered TDRs, First Federal either computes the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the original loan’s effective interest rate or it may measure impairment based on the fair value of the collateral. For those loans measured for impairment utilizing the present value of future cash flows method, any discount is carried as a reserve in the allowance for loan and lease losses. For those loans measured for impairment utilizing the fair value of the collateral, any shortfall is charged off.

 

 5359 

 

 

Earnings - The profitability of First Defiance is primarily dependent on its net interest income and non-interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income on interest-earning assets, principally loans and securities, and interest expense on interest-bearing deposits, FHLB advances, and other borrowings. The Company’s non-interest income is mainly derived from service fees and other charges, mortgage banking income, and insurance commissions. First Defiance's earnings also depend on the provision for loan losses and non-interest expenses, such as employee compensation and benefits, occupancy and equipment expense, deposit insurance premiums, and miscellaneous other expenses, as well as federal income tax expense.

 

Changes in Financial Condition

 

At June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, First Defiance's total assets, deposits and stockholders' equity amounted to $2.41$2.93 billion, $1.92$2.37 billion and $286.6$354.2 million, respectively, compared to $2.30$2.48 billion, $1.84$1.98 billion and $280.2$293.0 million, respectively, at December 31, 2015.2016. Total assets increased $368.3 million, deposits increased $307.9 million and stockholders equity increased $56.5 million due to the acquisition of Commercial Bancshares. See Note 17 – Business Combinations for further details regarding the Commercial Bancshares acquisition and the impact to the individual categories.

 

Net loans receivable (excluding loans held for sale) increased $58.6$298.5 million to $1.84$2.21 billion. The variance in loans receivable between June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015 include increases2016 includes an increase of $153.3 million in commercial real estate loans (up $52.9 million), commercial loans (up $9.3 million),a $69.4 million increase in residential real estate loans (up $1.5 million) and consumer,a $35.3 million increase in commercials loans, (up $409,000). These increases were slightly offset by decreasesa $14.5 million increase in home equity loans , a $14.3 million increase in construction loans (down $4.5 million),and a $11.0 million increase in consumer loans. The net loan amounts acquired from Commercial Bancshares at the acquisition date of February 24, 2017 resulted in a $159.2 million increase in commercial real estate loans a $58.4 million increase in residential real estate loans, a $35.1 million increase in commercial loans, a $15.7 million increase in home equity loans, (down $277,000).a $5.6 million increase in construction loans and a $10.9 million increase in consumer loans.,

 

The investment securities portfolio decreased $8.5increased $10.2 million to $228.2$261.3 million at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 from $236.7$251.2 million at December 31, 2015. The decrease is the result of $17.9 million of securities maturing or being called during the first six months of 2016 as well as sales of securities of $8.5 million. This was partially offset by purchases of $15.5 million of securities.2016. There was an unrealized gain in the investment portfolio of $8.4$4.1 million at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 compared to an unrealized gain of $6.2$3.4 million at December 31, 2015 an increase2016.

Goodwill and core deposit and other intangibles increased $29.0 million and $4.7 million, respectively to $90.8 million and $6.0 million, respectively due to the acquisition of $2.2 million.Commercial Bancshares.

 

Deposits increased from $1.84$1.98 billion at December 31, 20152016 to $1.92$2.37 billion as of June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017. Non-interest bearing demand deposits increased $22.1$92.3 million to $442.8$579.9 million, interest bearing demand and money market deposits increased $38.3$156.8 million to $805.6 million,$973.5 billion, and savings deposits increased $20.7$45.1 million to $240.3$288.5 million. Retail time deposits increased $3.0$98.0 million to $431.6$531.9 million. The net deposit amounts acquired from Commercial Bancshares at the acquisition date of February 24, 2107 resulted in a $56.1 million increase in Non-interest bearing demand deposits, a $122.0 million increase in interest bearing demand and money market deposits, a $31.6 million increase in savings deposits and a $98.2 million increase in retail time deposits.

60

 

Stockholders’ equity increased from $280.2$293.0 million at December 31, 20152016 to $286.6$354.2 million at June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017. The increase in stockholders’ equity was the result of recording net income of $14.4$5.1 million, an increase in other comprehensive income of $1.4$1.0 million and a $490,000an increase due to the exerciseacquisition of stock options. These were partiallyCommercial Bancshares of $56.5 million as a result of issuing 1.1 million shares of common stock. This was offset by $3.9$2.2 million of common stock dividends being paid in the first six monthsquarter of 2016 and $6.3 million in repurchased common stock.2017.

54

 

Average Balances, Net Interest Income and Yields Earned and Rates Paid

 

The following table presents for the periods indicated the total dollar amount of interest from average interest-earning assets and the resultant yields, as well as the interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, expressed both in thousands of dollars and rates, and the net interest margin. The table reports interest income from tax-exempt loans and investment on a tax-equivalent basis. All average balances are based upon daily balances (dollars in thousands).

 

 Three Months Ended June 30,  Three Months Ended March 31, 
 2016  2015  2017 2016 
 Average     Yield/ Average     Yield/  Average     Yield/ Average     Yield/ 
 Balance  Interest(1)  Rate(2)  Balance  Interest(1)  Rate(2)  Balance  Interest(1)  Rate(2)  Balance  Interest(1)  Rate(2) 
Interest-earning assets:                                                
Loans receivable $1,828,984  $19,716   4.34% $1,673,750  $18,186   4.36% $2,026,067  $22,020   4.41% $1,796,200  $19,363   4.34%
Securities  224,494   1,953   3.62   245,539   2,153   3.63   254,842   2,174   3.48(3)  233,815   2,054   3.65(3)
Interest bearing deposits  95,296   134   0.57   58,739   41   0.28   60,083   145   0.98   44,766   49   0.44 
FHLB stock  13,800   137   3.99   13,802   136   3.95   14,552   166   4.63   13,801   139   4.05 
Total interest-earning assets  2,162,574   21,940   4.10   1,991,830   20,516   4.15   2,355,544   24,505   4.22   2,088,582   21,605   4.18 
Non-interest-earning assets  228,490           220,773           266,858           225,621         
Total assets $2,391,064          $2,212,603          $2,622,402          $2,314,203         
                                                
Interest-bearing liabilities:                                                
Deposits $1,463,086  $1,545   0.42% $1,397,966  $1,312   0.38% $1,626,742  $1,796   0.45% $1,420,479  $1,433   0.41%
FHLB advances and other  84,506   321   1.53   39,578   173   1.75   104,277   366   1.42   78,670   297   1.52 
Subordinated debentures  36,141   182   2.03   36,128   150   1.67   36,150   215   2.41   36,137   175   1.95 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements  55,656   36   0.26   52,754   37   0.28   25,660   14   0.22   55,243   37   0.27 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  1,639,389   2,084   0.51   1,526,426   1,672   0.44   1,792,829   2,391   0.54   1,590,529   1,942   0.49 
Non-interest bearing deposits  440,053   -       382,946   -       482,895   -      414,866   -     
Total including non-interest bearing demand deposits  2,079,442   2,084   0.40   1,909,372   1,672   0.35   2,275,724   2,391   0.43   2,005,395   1,942   0.39 
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities  29,049           28,992           32,236           29,757         
Total liabilities  2,108,491           1,938,364           2,307,960           2,035,152         
Stockholders' equity  282,573           274,239           314,442           279,051         
Total liabilities and stock-holders' equity $2,391,064          $2,212,603         
Total liabilities and stock- holders' equity $2,622,402          $2,314,203         
Net interest income; interest rate spread     $19,856   3.59%     $18,844   3.71%     $22,114   3.68%     $19,663   3.69%
Net interest margin (3)(4)          3.71%          3.81%          3.81%          3.80%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities          132%          130%          131%          131%

 

 

(1)Interest on certain tax-exempt loans and securities is not taxable for Federal income tax purposes. In order to compare the tax-exempt yields on these assets to taxable yields, the interest earned on these assets is adjusted to a pre-tax equivalent amount based on the marginal corporate federal income tax rate of 35%.
(2)Annualized
(3)Net interest margin is netSecurities yield=annualized interest income divided by the average interest-earning assets.

55

  Six Months Ended June 30, 
  2016  2015 
  Average     Yield/  Average     Yield/ 
  Balance  Interest (1)  Rate (2)  Balance  Interest (1)  Rate (2) 
Interest-earning assets:                        
Loans receivable $1,812,592  $39,079   4.34% $1,660,404  $36,118   4.39%
Securities  229,154   4,007   3.64   243,281   4,264   3.65 
Interest bearing deposits  70,026   183   0.53   57,659   80   0.28 
FHLB stock  13,801   276   4.02   13,802   275   4.02 
Total interest-earning assets  2,125,573   43,545   4.13   1,975,146   40,737   4.18 
Non-interest-earning assets  227,061           221,135         
Total assets $2,352,634          $2,196,281         
                         
Interest-bearing liabilities:                        
Deposits $1,441,783  $2,978   0.42% $1,396,114  $2,584   0.37%
FHLB advances  81,598   618   1.52   30,534   283   1.87 
Subordinated debentures  36,140   357   2.00   36,129   297   1.66 
Securities sold under repurchase agreements  55,449   73   0.27   53,312   75   0.28 
Total interest-bearing liabilities  1,614,970   4,026   0.50   1,516,089   3,239   0.43 
Non-interest bearing deposits  427,459   -       374,533   -     
Total including non-interest bearing demand deposits  2,042,429   4,026   0.40   1,890,622   3,239   0.35 
Other non-interest-bearing liabilities  29,393           28,581         
Total liabilities  2,071,822           1,919,203         
Stockholders' equity  280,812           277,078         
Total liabilities and stock-holders' equity $2,352,634          $2,196,281         
Net interest income; interest rate spread   �� $39,519   3.63%     $37,498   3.75%
Net interest margin (3)          3.75%          3.84%
Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities          132%          130%

(1)Interest on certain tax-exempt loans andbalance of securities, is not taxable for Federal income tax purposes. In order to compare the tax-exempt yields on these assets to taxable yields, the interest earned on these assets is adjusted to a pre-tax equivalent amount based on the marginal corporate federal income tax rate of 35%.excluding average unrealized gains/losses.
(2)Annualized.
(3)(4)Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.

 

 5661 

 

Results of Operations

 

Three Months Ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015

 

On a consolidated basis, First Defiance’s net income for the quarter ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 was $7.3$5.1 million compared to net income of $6.6$7.2 million for the comparable period in 2015.2016. On a per share basis, basic and diluted earnings per common share for the quarterthree months ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 were $0.81$0.54 and $0.80,$0.54, respectively, compared to basic and diluted earnings per common share of $0.71$0.80 and $0.70,$0.79, respectively, for the same period in 2015.quarter ended March 31, 2016.

 

Net Interest Income

 

First Defiance’s net interest income is determined by its interest rate spread (i.e. the difference between the yields on its interest-earning assets and the rates paid on its interest-bearing liabilities) and the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

 

Net interest income was $19.4$21.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, up from $18.4$19.2 million for the same period in 2015.2016. The tax-equivalent net interest margin was 3.71%3.81% for the quarter ended June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, a decreaseslight increase from 3.81%3.80% for the same period in 2015.2016. The decreaseincrease in margin between the 20152017 and 2016 secondfirst quarters was due to a decreaseslight increase in interest-earning asset yields, which decreasedincreased to 4.10%4.22% for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, down 5March 31, 2017, up 4 basis points from 4.15%4.18% for the same period in 2015.2016. The cost of interest-bearing liabilities between the two periods increased 75 basis points to 0.51%0.54% in the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 from 0.44%0.49% in the same period in 2015. Total average loans grew $155.2 million since June 30, 2015 while interest bearing liabilities, including non-interest bearing demand deposits, increased $170.1 million for that same period. This resulted in an increase in short-term assets that yielded 0.57% at June 30, 2016. This change inThe acquisition of CSB’s earning asset mix resultedand low cost deposits along with the rise in a lowerinterest rates contributed to the increase in net interest margin for the second quarter of 2016. Management is encouraged by the continued growth in loan and deposit balances and looks for additional opportunities to maintain or minimize any negative impact to its margin in this sustained low rate environment.income.

 

Total interest income increased $1.5$2.9 million to $21.5$24.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 from $20.0$21.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2016. This is due to continued loan growth and a more profitable earning asset mix. Income from loans increased to $22.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 compared to $19.3 million for the same period in 2015.2016 due to average loan growth of $140.4 million due to the acquisition. The increase in the loan portfolio yield on totalto 4.41% at March 31, 2017 was due to increasing interest earning assetsrates and the acquisition of CSB as the weighted average yield at the acquisition date was 4.59%. The investment interest income increased $126,000 in the first quarter of 2017 to $1.8 million; however, decreasedthe yield dropped 17 basis points to 4.10%3.48% at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 compared to 3.65% at March 31, 2016. The decline in investment yield is primarily attributable to the reinvestment of matured securities at lower yields. Income from 4.15%interest bearing deposits and FHLB stock were $145,000 and $165,000 respectively in the first quarter of 2017 compared to $49,000 and $139,000 for the same period in 2015. The loan portfolio yield decreased slightly2016 due to 4.34% at June 30, 2016 from 4.36% forincreased interest rates.

Interest expense increased by $449,000 in the first quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2015. Investment portfolio yields also decreased slightly2016, to 3.62%$2.4 million from $1.9 million. The cost of interest bearing liabilities increased 5 basis points from 0.49% at June 30,March 31, 2016 from 3.63%to 0.54% at June 30, 2015.March 31, 2017. Interest income from investments decreasedexpense related to $2.0interest-bearing deposits was $1.8 million forin the first quarter ended June 30, 2016of 2017 compared to $2.2$1.4 million for the same period in 2015 due to decreased average volumes of $21.0 million year over year. Interest income from interest bearing deposits increased $93,000 to $134,000 at June 30, 2016 from $41,000. This is due to an increase in volumes of $36.6 million year over year as well as an increase in the average yield to 0.57% at June 30, 2016 from 0.28% at June 30, 2015 as a result of an increase in the fed funds rate.

57

Total interest expense increased by $412,000 in the second quarter of 2016 compared to the same period in 2015, to $2.1 million from $1.7 million. There was a 7 basis point increase in the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities in the second quarter of 2016. Interest expense on interest bearing deposits increased $233,000 to $1.5 million at June 30, 2016 from $1.3 million at June 30, 2015. This is due to a $65.1 million increase in volumes of interest bearing deposits year over year and a 4 basis point increase in rates on interest bearing deposits year over year. Interest expense related to FHLB advance increased by $148,000 to $321,000 in the second quarter of 2016 from $173,000 in the same period in 2015. This is due to a $44.9 million increase in volumes of FHLB advances. Despite the increase in volumes of FHLB advances, the yield decreased to 1.53% at June 30, 2016 from 1.75% at June 30, 2015. Interest expense recognized by the Company related to subordinated debenturesFHLB advances was $182,000$366,000 in the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 compared to $150,000$297,000 for the same period in 2015.2016 due to increased volumes in lower cost advances. Expenses on subordinated debentures and securities sold under repurchase agreements were $215,000 and $14,000 respectively in the first quarter of 2017 compared to $175,000 and $37,000 respectively for the same period in 2016.

62

 

Allowance for Loan Losses

 

The allowance for loan losses represents management’s assessment of the estimated probable incurred credit losses in the loan portfolio at each balance sheet date. Management analyzes the adequacy of the allowance for loan losses regularly through reviews of the loan portfolio. Consideration is given to economic conditions, changes in interest rates and the effect of such changes on collateral values and borrower’s ability to pay, changes in the composition of the loan portfolio and trends in past due and non-performing loan balances. The allowance for loan losses is a material estimate that is susceptible to significant fluctuation and is established through a provision for loan losses based on management’s evaluation of the inherent risk in the loan portfolio. In addition to extensive in-house loan monitoring procedures, the Company utilizes an outside party to conduct an independent loan review of commercial loan and commercial real estate loan relationships. The goal is to have approximately 55% to 60% of the portfolio reviewed annually. This includes all relationships over $5.0 million with new exposure greater than $2.0 million and a sample of other relationships greater than $5.0 million; loan relationships between $1.0 million and $5.0 million with new exposure greater than $750,000 and a sample of other relationships between $1.0 million and $5.0 million; and a sample of relationships less than $1.0 million. Management utilizes the results of this outside loan review to assess the effectiveness of its internal loan grading system as well as to assist in the assessment of the overall adequacy of the allowance for loan losses associated with these types of loans.

 

The allowance for loan loss is made up of two basic components. The first component of the allowance for loan loss is the specific reserve in which the Company sets aside reserves based on the analysis of individual impaired credits. In establishing specific reserves, the Company analyzes all substandard, doubtful and loss graded loans quarterly and makes judgments about the risk of loss based on the cash flow of the borrower, the value of any collateral and the financial strength of any guarantors. If the loan is impaired and cash flow dependent, then a specific reserve is established for the discount on the net present value of expected future cash flows. If the loan is impaired and collateral dependent, then any shortfall is usually charged off. The Company also considers the impacts of any Small Business Association or Farm Service Agency guarantees. The specific reserves were $288,000reserve portion of the allowance for loan losses was $772,000 at June 30, 2016 compared to $437,000March 31, 2017 and $809,000 at December 31, 2015.

58

2016.

 

The second component is a general reserve, which is used to record loan loss reserves for groups of homogenous loans in which the Company estimates the losses incurred in the portfolio based on quantitative and qualitative factors. For purposes of the general reserve analysis, the loan portfolio is stratified into nine different loan pools based on loan type to allocate historic loss experience. The loss experience factor is then applied to the non-impaired loan portfolio. Beginning June 30, 2015, theThe Company has refined the methodology to its allowance for loan loss calculation pertaining to the general reserve component for non-impaired loans. There was no change to the calculation of the component for reserves on impaired loans. Within the general reserve, the determination of the historical loss component was modified from using a three-year average annual loss rate to a loss migration measurement. The loss migration measurement implemented June 30, 2015, utilizesutilized an average of four (4) four-year loss migration periods for each loan portfolio segment with differentiation between loan risk grades. ThisPrior to June 30, 2015, the approach to this component quantified the historical loss by calculating a rolling twelve quarter average annual loss rate for each portfolio segment, without differentiation between loan risk grades. Beginning December 31, 2016 the historical loss calculation was changed from using a an average of four (4) four-year loss migration periods to using an average of all four-year loss migration periods to the present beginning with data from the second quarter 2011. Management believes this enhancement is consistent with the rationale of the previous measurement but provides for a more precise reflectioncalculation of probable incurredhistorical losses by risk grade within each loan portfolio segment over anincorporating more data points for the average loan lifeloss ratio and including periods that provide a more complete coverage of the full business cycle. Management believes that capturing the risk grade changes and cumulative losses over the life cycle of a loan more accurately depicts management’s estimate of historical losses as well as being more reflective of the ongoing risks in the loan portfolio. Prior to June 30, 2015, the approach to this component quantified the historical loss by calculating a rolling twelve quarter average annual loss rate for each portfolio segment, without differentiation between loan risk grades. This modificationThese modifications resulted in a change in the general reserves between the loan portfolio segments but did not have a material impact on the overall allowance for loan losses.

 

63

The quantitative general allowance decreasedincreased $300,000 to $9.5$9.0 million at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 from $9.8$8.7 million at December 31, 20152016 primarily due to the roll off of a high charge-off quarteran increase in the migration analysis resulting in a lower migration loss percentage for a majoritybalance of loan segments.criticized loans.

 

In addition to the quantitative analysis, a qualitative analysis is performed each quarter to provide additional general reserves on the non-impaired loan portfolio for various factors. The overall qualitative factors are based on nine sub-factors. The nine sub-factors have been aggregated into three qualitative factors: economic, environment and risk.

 

ECONOMIC

1)Changes in international, national and local economic business conditions and developments, including the condition of various market segments.
2)Changes in the value of underlying collateral for collateral dependent loans.

 

ENVIRONMENT

3)Changes in the nature and volume in the loan portfolio.
4)The existence and effect of any concentrations of credit and changes in the level of such concentrations.
5)Changes in lending policies and procedures, including underwriting standards and collection, charge-off and recovery practices.
6)Changes in the quality and breadth of the loan review process.
7)Changes in the experience, ability and depth of lending management and staff.

 

59

RISK

8)Changes in the trends of the volume and severity of delinquent and classified loans, and changes in the volume of non-accrual loans, trouble debt restructuring, and other loan modifications.
9)Changes in the political and regulatory environment.

 

The qualitative analysis at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 indicated a general reserve of $16.2$15.9 million compared with $15.2$16.4 million at December 31, 2015.2016. Management reviewed the overall economic, environmental and risk factors and determined that it was appropriate to increase, primarily themake adjustments to these sub-factors based on that review.

64

The economic factors for all commercial and commercial loan segments were reduced in the first quarter of 2017 due to uncertain global economic conditions and related market volatility which present higher than normal risks tostability in the U.S. economy.economy and forecasts for continued strengthening of the labor market.

The environmental factors were decreased slightly in the first quarter of 2017 in all loan segments due to newer loan volume having a stricter adherence to loan policy, stability in the lending staff and the maturation of the process of centralized problem loan workout.

The risk factors for commercial, construction, home equity and residential loans were decreased in the first quarter of 2017 while the risk factors for commercial real estate and commercial loans were increased due to trends in the levels of non-performing loans and classified assets.

 

First Defiance’s general reserve percentages for main loan segments not otherwise classified ranged from 0.68%0.46% for construction loans to 1.93%1.72% for home equity and improvement loans at June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017.

 

As a result of the quantitative and qualitative analyses, along with the change in specific reserves, the Company’s provision for loan losses for the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 was $53,000,$55,000, compared to no provision expense$364,000 for the same period in 2015.2016. The allowance for loan losses was $25.7 million and $25.9 million and $25.4 million and represented 1.39% and 1.41%1.15% of loans (1.32% excluding acquired loans), net of undisbursed loan funds and deferred fees and costs, at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and 1.33% at December 31, 2015, respectively.2016. The loans acquired from CSB were recorded at fair value and have no allowance for loan loss attributed to them. The provision of $53,000,$55,000 was offset by charge offs of $139,000$464,000 and recoveries of $366,000, resulted$274,000, resulting in an increasedecrease to the overall allowance for loan loss of $280,000$135,000 for the secondfirst quarter of 2016.2017. In management’s opinion, the overall allowance for loan losses of $25.9$25.7 million as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 is adequate.

 

Management also assesses the value of real estate owned as of the end of each accounting period and recognizes write-downs to the value of that real estate in the income statement if conditions dictate. In the three month period ended June 30, 2016, First Defiance hadMarch 31, 2017, there were no write-downs of real estate held for sale. Management believes that the values recorded at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 for real estate owned and repossessed assets represent the realizable value of such assets.

 

Total classified loans decreasedincreased to $37.2$35.5 million at June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, compared to $49.1$27.5 million at December 31, 2015.2016. Classified loans acquired from CSB represent $6.0 million of the increase.

 

First Defiance’s ratio of allowance for loan losses to non-performing loans was 158.0%170.8% at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 compared with 156.1%180.4% at December 31, 2015.2016. Management monitors collateral values of all loans included on the watch list that are collateral dependent and believes that the allowances for those loans at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 are appropriate. Of the $16.4$15.1 million in non-accrual loans at June 30, 2016, $9.8March 31, 2017, $11.0 million or 68.3%73.0% are less than 90 days past due.

 

65

At June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, First Defiance had total non-performing assets of $17.5$15.8 million, compared to $17.6$14.8 million at December 31, 2015.2016. Non-performing assets include loans that are on non-accrual, real estate owned and other assets held for sale. Non-performing assets at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 20152016 by category were as follows:

60

 

Table 1 – Nonperforming Asset

 

 June 30, December 31,  March 31, December 31, 
 2016  2015  2017  2016 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
Non-performing loans:                
One to four family residential real estate $2,708  $2,610  $2,759  $2,928 
Non-residential and multi-family residential real estate  10,799   9,848   9,823   9,592 
Commercial  2,223   3,078   1,498   1,007 
Construction  -   -   -   - 
Home equity and improvement  677   689   875   730 
Consumer Finance  16   36   102   91 
Total non-performing loans  16,423   16,261   15,057   14,348 
                
Real estate owned  1,079   1,321   705   455 
Other repossessed assets  -   -   -   - 
Total repossessed assets $1,079   1,321  $705   455 
                
Total Nonperforming assets $17,502  $17,582  $15,762  $14,803 
                
Restructured loans, accruing $9,648  $11,178  $9,771  $10,544 
                
Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of total assets  0.73%  0.77%  0.54%  0.60%
Total nonperforming loans as a percentage of total loans*  0.90%  0.91%  0.67%  0.74%
Total nonperforming assets as a percentage of total loans plus REO*  0.94%  0.97%  0.70%  0.76%
Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total nonperforming assets  148.26%  144.36%  163.19%  174.86%

 

* Total loans are net of undisbursed loan funds and deferred fees and costs.

 

Non-performing loans in the commercial loan category represented 0.52%0.30% of the total loans in those categoriesthat category at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 compared to 0.73%0.21% for the same category at December 31, 2015.2016. Non-performing loans in the commercial real estate loan category represented 1.08%were 0.82% of the total loans in those categoriesthis category at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 compared to 1.04%0.92% at December 31, 2016. Non-performing loans in the residential loan category represented 1.00% of the total loans in that category at March 31, 2017 compared to 1.41% for the same category at December 31, 2015. Management believes that the current allowance for loan losses is appropriate and that the provision for loan losses is consistent with both charge-off experience and the risk inherent in the overall credits in the portfolio.2016.

 

First Federal’s Asset Review Committee meets monthly to review the status of work-out strategies for all criticized relationships, which include all non-accrual loans. Based on such factors as anticipated collateral values in liquidation scenarios, cash flow projections, assessment of net worth of guarantors and all other factors which may mitigate risk of loss, the Asset Review Committee makes recommendations regarding proposed charge-offs which are approved by the Senior Loan Committee or the Loan Loss Reserve Committee.

 

 6166 

 

 

The following table details net charge-offs and nonaccrual loans by loan type.

 

Table 2 – Net Charge-offs and Non-accruals by Loan Type

 

 For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2016  As of June 30, 2016  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2017  As of March 31, 2017 
 Net Charge-offs
(Recoveries)
 % of Total Net
Charge-offs
(Recoveries)
 Nonaccrual
Loans
 % of Total Non-
Accrual Loans
  Net
Charge-offs
(Recovery)
 % of Total Net
Charge-offs
 Nonaccrual
Loans
 % of Total
Non-Accrual
Loans
 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands)    (In Thousands)   (In Thousands)   
Residential $(28)  18.79% $2,708   16.49% $(7)  (3.68)% $2,759   18.32%
Construction  -   0.00%  -   0.00%  -   0.00%  -   0.00%
Commercial real estate  (393)  263.76%  10,799   65.76%  224   117.89%  9,823   65.24%
Commercial  280   (187.92)%  2,223   13.54%  (115)  (60.53)%  1,498   9.95%
Consumer finance  (31)  20.81%  16   0.10%
Consumer  67   35.27%  102   0.68%
Home equity and improvement  23   (15.44)%  677   4.12%  21   11.05%  875   5.81%
Total $(149)  100.00% $16,423   100.00% $190   100.00% $15,074   100.00%

 

 For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2015  As of June 30, 2015  For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016  As of March 31, 2016 
 Net Charge-offs
(Recoveries)
 % of Total Net
Charge-offs
(Recoveries)
 Nonaccrual
Loans
 % of Total Non-
Accrual Loans
  Net
Charge-offs
(Recovery)
 % of Total Net
Charge-offs
 Nonaccrual
Loans
 % of Total
Non-Accrual
Loans
 
 (In Thousands)   (In Thousands)    (In Thousands)   (In Thousands)   
Residential $16   (3.21)% $2,942   17.58% $(31)  (39.74)% $3,130   17.68%
Construction  -   0.00%  -   0.00%  -   0.00%  -   0.00%
Commercial real estate  (464)  93.17%  9,786   58.47%  (164)  (210.26)%  10,344   58.42%
Commercial  (188)  37.75%  3,446   20.59%  317   406.41%  3,551   20.05%
Consumer finance  (11)  2.21%  10   0.06%
Consumer  (35)  (44.87)%  9   0.05%
Home equity and improvement  149   (29.92)%  553   3.30%  (9)  (11.54)%  673   3.80%
Total $(498)  100.00% $16,737   100.00% $78   100.00% $17,707   100.00%

 

Table 3 – Allowance for Loan Loss Activity

 

 For the Quarter Ended  For the Quarter Ended 
 2nd 2016 1st 2016 4th 2015 3rd 2015 2nd 2015  1st 2017 4th 2016 3rd 2016 2nd 2016 1st 2016 
 (In Thousands)  (In Thousands) 
                      
Allowance at beginning of period $25,668  $25,382  $25,209  $25,384  $25,302  $25,884  $25,923  $25,948  $25,668  $25,382 
Provision for credit losses  53   364   43   (27)  -   55   (149)  15   53   364 
Charge-offs:                                        
Residential  37   55   8   185   11   49   147   111   37   55 
Commercial real estate  -   13   103   64   146   290   -   79   -   13 
Commercial  18   336   -   43   23   -   234   26   18   336 
Consumer finance  18   -   32   5   13   71   53   24   18   - 
Home equity and improvement  66   30   10   110   187   54   98   74   66   30 
Total charge-offs  139   434   153   407   380   464   532   314   139   434 
Recoveries  366   356   282   259   462   274   642   274   366   356 
Net charge-offs (recoveries)  (227)  78   (129)  148   (82)
Net charge-offs  190   (110)  40   (227)  78 
Ending allowance $25,948  $25,668  $25,382  $25,209  $25,384  $25,749  $25,884  $25,923  $25,948  $25,668 

 

 6267 

 

 

The following table sets forth information concerning the allocation of First Federal’s allowance for loan losses by loan categories at the dates indicated.

 

Table 4 – Allowance for Loan Loss Allocation by Loan Category

 

 June 30, 2016 March 31, 2016 December 31, 2015 September 30, 2015 June 30, 2015  March 31, 2017 December 31, 2016 September 30, 2016 June 30, 2016 March 31, 2016 
   Percent of   Percent of   Percent of   Percent of   Percent of    Percent of   Percent of   Percent of   Percent of   Percent of 
   total loans   total loans   total loans   total loans   total loans    total loans   total loans   total loans   total loans   total loans 
 Amount by category Amount by category Amount by category Amount by category Amount by category  Amount by category Amount by category Amount by category Amount by category Amount by category 
 (Dollars In Thousands)  (Dollars In Thousands) 
Residential $2,839   10.71% $3,109   11.05% $3,212   10.98% $2,779   11.48% $2,877   11.68% $2,621   11.86% $2,627   10.20% $2,432   10.34% $2,839   10.71% $3,109   11.05%
Construction  633   8.35%  489   7.71%  517   8.76%  239   7.22%  308   7.98%  458   8.55%  450   8.99%  412   8.76%  633   8.35%  489   7.71%
Commercial real estate  13,269   51.84%  13,894   52.37%  13,923   50.71%  14,397   51.55%  14,365   50.40%  12,332   51.12%  12,853   51.13%  12,787   51.64%  13,269   51.84%  13,894   52.37%
Commercial  6,740   22.19%  5,820   21.85%  5,255   22.42%  5,411   22.51%  5,567   22.85%  7,809   21.59%  7,361   23.05%  7,879   22.56%  6,740   22.19%  5,820   21.85%
Consumer finance  189   0.86%  124   0.83%  171   0.87%  158   0.88%  160   0.85%
Consumer  229   1.19%  207   0.82%  216   0.85%  189   0.86%  124   0.83%
Home equity and improvement  2,278   6.05%  2,232   6.19%  2,304   6.26%  2,225   6.36%  2,107   6.24%  2,300   5.69%  2,386   5.81%  2,197   5.85%  2,278   6.05%  2,232   6.19%
 $25,948   100.00% $25,668   100.00% $25,382   100.00% $25,209   100.00% $25,384   100.00% $25,749   100.00% $25,884   100.00% $25,923   100.00% $25,948   100.00% $25,668   100.00%

 

Key Asset Quality Ratio Trends

 

Table 5 – Key Asset Quality Ratio Trends

 

 2nd Qtr 2016 1st Qtr 2016 4th Qtr 2015 3rd Qtr 2015 2nd Qtr2015  1st Qtr 2017 4th Qtr 2016 3rd Qtr 2016 2nd Qtr 2016 1st Qtr 2016 
Allowance for loan losses / loans*  1.39%  1.41%  1.41%  1.45%  1.49%  1.15%  1.33%  1.35%  1.39%  1.41%
Allowance for loan losses to net charge-offs  -11430.84%  32907.69%  -19675.97%  17033.11%  -30956.10%
Allowance for loan losses / non-performing assets  148.26%  136.40%  144.36%  116.99%  114.82%  163.19%  174.86%  137.14%  148.26%  136.40%
Allowance for loan losses / non-performing loans  158.00%  144.96%  156.09%  151.75%  151.66%  170.82%  180.40%  142.45%  158.00%  144.96%
Non-performing assets / loans plus REO*  0.94%  1.03%  0.97%  1.24%  1.29%  0.70%  0.76%  0.98%  0.94%  1.03%
Non-performing assets / total assets  0.73%  0.80%  0.77%  0.97%  1.01%  0.54%  0.60%  0.77%  0.73%  0.80%
Net charge-offs / average loans (annualized)  -0.05%  0.02%  -0.03%  0.03%  -0.02%  0.04%  -0.02%  0.01%  -0.05%  0.02%

* Total loans are net of undisbursed funds and deferred fees and costs.

 

Non-Interest Income.

 

Total non-interest income increased $766,000$1.9 million in the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 to $8.6$10.5 million from $7.8$8.6 million for the same period in 2015.2016.

 

Service Fees.Service fees and other charges increased by $109,000$116,000 or 4.1%4.5% in the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 compared to the same period in 20152016 mainly due mainly to increased deposit accounts and balances.

68

 

First Federal’s overdraft privilege program generally provides for the automatic payment of modest overdraft limits on all accounts deemed to be in good standing when the account is accessed using paper-based check processing, a teller withdrawal, a point-of-sale terminal, an ACH transaction, an online banking or voice-response transfer, or an ATM. To be in good standing, an account must be brought to a positive balance within a 30-day period and have not excessively used the overdraft privilege program. Overdraft limits are established for all customers without discrimination using a risk assessment approach for each account classification. The approach includes a systematic review and evaluation of the normal deposit flows made to each account classification to establish reasonable and prudent negative balance limits that would be routinely repaid by normal, expected and reoccurring deposits. The risk assessment by portfolio approach assumes a minimal degree of undetermined credit risk associated with unidentified individual accounts that are overdrawn for 30 or more days. Consumer accounts overdrawn for more than 60 days are automatically charged off. Fees are charged as a one-time fee per occurrence, up to five charges per day, and the fee charged for an item that is paid is equal to the fee charged for a non-sufficient fund item that is returned.

 

63

Overdrawn balances, net of allowance for losses, are reflected as loans on First Defiance’s balance sheet. The fees charged for this service are established based both on the return of processing costs plus a profit, and on the level of fees charged by competitors in the Company’s market area for similar services. These fees are considered to be compensation for providing a service to the customer and therefore deemed to be noninterest income rather than interest income. Fee income recorded for the quarters ending June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 related to the overdraft privilege product, net of adjustments to the allowance for uncollectible overdrafts, were $588,000$569,000 and $705,000,$657,000, respectively. Accounts charged off are included in noninterest expense. The allowance for uncollectible overdrafts was $20,000$12,000 at June 30, 2016, $18,000March 31, 2017, $14,000 at December 31, 20152016 and $26,000$15,000 at June 30, 2015.March 31, 2016.

Mortgage Banking Activity. Mortgage banking income was $1.8Total revenue from the sale and servicing of mortgage loans increased $199,000 to $1.7 million in the second quarter of 2016, even with $1.8 million in the second quarter of 2015. Mortgage originations totaled $76.0 million in the second quarter of 2016, up seasonally fromfor the first quarter of 2017 compared to $1.5 million for the same period of 2016 but down slightly from $76.9 millionmostly due to higher mortgage volumes in the samefirst quarter last year.2017. Gains realized from the sale of mortgage loans increased in the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 to $1.4$1.1 million from $1.2 million$994,000 in the secondfirst quarter of 2015. Mortgage2016. The mortgage loan servicing revenue was $876,000increased $57,000 to $934,000 in the secondfirst quarter of 2016, up slightly from $852,0002017 compared to $877,000 in the secondsame period in 2016. The Company recorded a positive valuation adjustment of $33,000 on mortgage servicing rights in the first quarter of 2015. First Defiance had2017 compared to a negative changevaluation adjustment of $21,000 in the valuation adjustment in mortgage servicing assets of $104,000 in the secondfirst quarter of 2016 compared with a positive adjustment of $141,000 in the second quarter of 2015.

Sale of Non Mortgage Loans. Gain on the sale of non-mortgages, which includes SBA and FSA loans, totaled $411,000 in the second quarter 2016 compared to $197,000 in the second quarter 2015, an increase of $214,000 mainly due to an increase in loan volume.2016.

 

Insurance Sales Commissions.Commission Income. Income from the sale of insurance and investment products was $2.5$3.5 million in the secondfirst quarter of 2016 compared to $2.3 million for the same period in 2015,2017, an increase of $160,000. Most of this increase is attributable to the Buckeye acquisition that closed late$321,000 from $3.1 million in the thirdfirst quarter of 2015.2016. First Defiance’s insurance subsidiary, First Insurance, typically recognizes contingent revenues during the first quarter. These revenues are bonuses paid by insurance carriers when the Company achieves certain loss ratios or growth targets. In the first quarter of 2017, First Insurance earned $1.2 million of contingent income compared to $799,000 for the first quarter of 2016.

 

Gain on Sale of SecuritiesBank-Owned Life Insurance.. The secondIncome from bank-owned life insurance was $1.8 million in the first quarter of 2016 included gains2017, an increase of $227,000$1.6 million from the sale or call of securities, compared to no gains or losses$231,000 in the secondfirst quarter of 2015.2016. In February 2017, the Company surrendered an underperforming BOLI policy and recorded a tax penalty of $1.7 million (recorded in income tax expense) and purchased a new BOLI policy receiving a $1.5 million enhancement value gain.

69

 

Non-Interest Expense.

 

Non-interest expense increased to $17.3$23.1 million for the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 compared to $16.8$17.3 million for the same period in 2015.2016. Included in the first quarter of 2017 are $3.6 million of merger and conversion related costs associated with the acquisition of CSB.

 

Compensation and Benefits. Compensation and benefits increased to $9.8$14.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 from $9.2$10.2 million for the same period in 2015.2016. The increase is mainly attributable to highermerger costs to settle employment and benefit agreements and for health benefit plans, merit increases andpersonnel expenses related to operating the new staff to support of our growth strategies.CSB locations.

64

Other Non-interest ExpenseNon-Interest Expenses. Other non-interest expenses increased $1.1 to $4.0 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2017 from $2.9 million for the same period in 2016. The increase in other non-interest expense of $3.2 million in the second quarter of 2016 was down slightly from $3.3 million in the second quarter of 2015. The decrease wasis primarily due to OREO write-downsCSB merger and conversion related costs of $182,000 in the second quarter of 2015 compared to no write-downs in the second quarter of 2016.$667,000.

 

The efficiency ratio, considering tax equivalent interest income and excluding securities gains and losses, for the secondfirst quarter of 20162017 was 61.51%70.85% compared to 63.02%61.32% for the same period in 2015.first quarter of 2016. The first quarter of 2017 was negatively impacted by the aforementioned merger and conversion related costs.

 

Income Taxes.

 

First Defiance computes federal income tax expense in accordance with ASC Topic 740, Subtopic 942, which resulted in an effective tax rate of 31.28%42.9% for the quarter ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 compared to 30.02%29.6% for the same period in 2015.2016. The tax rate for 2017 is higher than the statutory 35% tax rate due to the $1.7 million tax penalty related to the surrender of a BOLI policy. The tax rate for 2016 is lower than the statutory 35% tax rate for the Company mainly because of investments in tax-exempt securities and bank-owned life insurance (“BOLI”).securities. The earnings on tax-exempt securities and BOLI are not subject to federal income tax. As a result of adopting ASU 2016-09, a $31,000 credit to tax expense was recorded in the second quarter of 2016 and a $99,000 credit to tax expense was recorded in the first quarter of 2016.

 

Six Months Ended June 30, 2016 and 2015

On a consolidated basis, First Defiance’s net income for the six months ended June 30, 2016 was $14.4 million compared to income of $13.2 million for the same period in 2015. On a per share basis, basic and diluted earnings per common share for the six months ended June 30, 2016 were $1.61 and $1.59, respectively, compared to basic and diluted earnings per common share of $1.42 and $1.39, respectively, for the same period in 2015.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income was $38.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $36.6 million for the same period in 2015. For the six month period ended June 30, 2016, total interest income was $42.6 million compared to $39.8 million for the same period in 2015.

Interest expense increased by $787,000 to $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $3.2 million for the same period in 2015.

Net interest margin for the first six months of 2016 was 3.75%; a decrease of 9 basis points from the 3.84% margin reported in the six month period ended June 30, 2015.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses was $417,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2016, compared to $120,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2015. Charge-offs for the first half of 2016 were $573,000 and recoveries of previously charged off loans totaled $722,000 for net recoveries of $149,000. By comparison, $661,000 of charge-offs were recorded in the same period of 2015 and $1.2 million of recoveries were realized for net recoveries of $498,000.

65

Non-Interest Income

Total non-interest income increased $1.1 million to $17.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $16.1 million recognized for the same period in 2015.

Service Fees.Service fees and other charges were $5.4 million for the first six months of 2016, up from $5.2 million for the same period in 2015.

Mortgage Banking Activity. Total revenue from the sale and servicing of mortgage loans decreased $265,000 to $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 from $3.6 million for the same period in 2015. Gains realized from the sale of mortgage loans decreased $111,000 to $2.4 million for the first six months of 2016 from $2.5 million for the same period in 2015. Mortgage loan servicing revenue remained flat at $1.7 million in both the first half of 2016 and the same period in 2015. The decrease in gains realized from the sale of mortgage loans was offset by a $112,000 decrease in the amortization of mortgage servicing rights. The Company recorded a negative valuation adjustment of $125,000 in the first six months of 2016 compared to a positive adjustment of $167,000 in the first six months of 2015.

Sale of Non Mortgage Loans. Gain on the sale of non-mortgages, which includes SBA and FSA loans, totaled $456,000 in the first six months of 2016 compared to $233,000 in the same period of 2015, an increase of $223,000.

Gain on Sale of Securities.First Defiance recorded a gain on the sale or call of securities of $358,000 in the first six months of 2016 compared with no securities gains or losses during the same period of 2015.

Non-Interest Expense

Non-interest expense was $34.6 million for the first six months of 2016, up from $33.7 million for the same period in 2015.

Compensation and Benefits. Compensation and benefits increased to $20.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to $18.1 million for the same period in 2015. The increase is mainly related to merit increases, staff additions to support growth strategies and higher medical insurance costs.

Other Non-Interest Expenses. Other non-interest expenses decreased $854,000 to $6.1 million for the first six months of 2016 from $7.0 million for the same period in 2015. The decrease in other non-interest expense is primarily due to write downs of $705,000 relating to real estate owned properties in the first six months of 2015 compared to only $53,000 in the first six months of 2016.

The efficiency ratio for the first six months of 2016 was 61.42% compared to 62.87% for the same period in 2015.

66

Liquidity

 

As a regulated financial institution, First Federal is required to maintain appropriate levels of "liquid" assets to meet short-term funding requirements.

 

First Defiance had $5.2$8.3 million of cash provided by operating activities during the first sixthree months of 2016.2017. The Company's cash provided by operating activities resulted from the origination of loans held for sale and net income mostly offset by the proceeds on the sale of loans.

 

At June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, First Federal had $157.1$75.3 million in outstanding loan commitments and loans in process to be funded generally within the next six months and an additional $411.8$552.5 million committed under existing consumer and commercial lines of credit and standby letters of credit. Also at June 30, 2016,that date, First Federal had commitments to sell $40.8$24.0 million of mortgage loans.loans held-for-sale. First Defiance believes that it has adequate resources to fund commitments as they arise and that it can adjust the rate on savings certificates to retain deposits in changing interest rate environments. If First Defiance requires funds beyond its internal funding capabilities, advances from the FHLB of Cincinnati and other financial institutions are available.

70

 

Liquidity risk arises from the possibility that the Company may not be able to meet its financial obligations and operating cash needs or may become overly reliant upon external funding sources. In order to manage this risk, the Company’s Board of Directors has established a Liquidity Policy that identifies primary sources of liquidity, establishes procedures for monitoring and measuring liquidity and quantifies minimum liquidity requirements. This policy designates First Federal’s Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) as the body responsible for meeting these objectives. The ALCO reviews liquidity on a monthly basis and approves significant changes in strategies that affect balance sheet or cash flow positions. Liquidity is centrally managed on a daily basis by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and Controller.

 

Capital Resources

 

Capital is managed at First Federal and on a consolidated basis. Capital levels are maintained based on regulatory capital requirements and the economic capital required to support credit, market, liquidity and operational risks inherent in our business, as well as flexibility needed for future growth and new business opportunities.

 

In July 2013, the federal banking agencies approved the final rules implementing the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision’s capital guidelines for U.S. banks (commonly known as Basel III). Under the final rules, which began for the Company and the Bank on January 1, 20152016 and are subject to a phase-in period through January 1, 2019, minimum requirements increased for both quantity and quality of capital held by the Company and the Bank. The rules include a new minimum common equity Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets ratio (“CET1”) of 4.5% and a capital conservation buffer of 2.5%0.625% of risk-weighted assets which whenduring 2016 and 1.25% during the year 2017, and increasing each year until fully phased-in during 2019 at 2.50%, effectively resultsresulting in a minimum CET1 ratio of 7.0%. Basel III raises the minimum ratio of Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets from 4.0% to 6.0% (which, with the capital conservation buffer, effectively results in a minimum Tier 1 capital ratio of 8.5% when fully phased-in), which effectively results in a minimum total capital to risk-weighted assets ratio of 10.5% (with the capital conservation buffer fully phased-in), and requires a minimum leverage ratio of 4.0%. Basel III also makes changes to risk weights for certain assets and off-balance sheet exposures.

 

 6771 

 

 

The Company met each of the well capitalized ratio guidelines at June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017. The following table indicates the capital ratios for First Defiance and First Federal at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015.2016. (In Thousands):

 

June 30, 2016
March 31, 2017March 31, 2017
 Actual Minimum Required for
Adequately Capitalized
 Minimum Required for Well
Capitalized
  Actual Minimum Required for
Adequately Capitalized
 Minimum Required for
Well Capitalized
 
 Amount Ratio Amount Ratio Amount Ratio  Amount Ratio Amount Ratio(1) Amount Ratio 
CET1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) (1)(2)CET1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) (1)(2)CET1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) (1)(2)                        
Consolidated $223,294   10.63% $94,566   4.5%  N/A   N/A  $262,067   10.13% $116,445   4.5%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $243,469   11.58% $94,590   4.5% $136,630   6.5% $284,119   10.98% $116,464   4.5% $168,226   6.5%
                                                
Tier 1 Capital (1)                                                
Consolidated $258,294   11.12% $92,906   4.0%  N/A   N/A  $297,067   10.35% $114,845   4.0%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $243,469   10.51% $92,677   4.0% $115,847   5.0% $284,119   9.91% $114,660   4.0% $143,325   5.0%
                                                
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)                                             
Consolidated $258,294   12.29% $126,088   6.0%  N/A   N/A  $297,067   11.48% $155,260   6.0%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $243,469   11.58% $126,120   6.0% $168,160   8.0% $284,119   10.98% $155,286   6.0% $207,048   8.0%
                                                
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)                                             
Consolidated $284,242   13.53% $168,118   8.0%  N/A   N/A  $322,816   12.48% $207,014   8.0%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $269,418   12.82% $168,160   8.0% $210,200   10.0% $309,868   11.97% $207,048   8.0% $258,809   10.0%

 

(1)Excludes capital conservation buffer of 1.25% as of March 31, 2017
(2)Core capital is computed as a percentage of adjusted total assets of $2.32$2.87 billion for consolidated and the Bank, respectively. Risk-based capital is computed as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets of $2.59 billion for consolidated and the Bank, respectively.

December 31, 2016
  Actual  Minimum Required for
Adequately Capitalized
  Minimum Required for
Well Capitalized
 
  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio(1)  Amount  Ratio 
CET1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) (2)                        
Consolidated $234,809   10.45% $101,108   4.5%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $242,928   10.81% $101,116   4.5% $146,057   6.5%
                         
Tier 1 Capital (1)                        
Consolidated $269,809   11.24% $95,975   4.0%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $242,928   10.14% $95,791   4.0% $119,739   5.0%
                         
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)                        
Consolidated $269,809   12.01% $134,811   6.0%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $242,928   10.81% $134,822   6.0% $179,763   8.0%
                         
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)                        
Consolidated $295,693   13.16% $179,748   8.0%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $268,812   11.96% $179,763   8.0% $224,703   10.0%

(1)Excludes capital conservation buffer of 0.625% as of December 31, 2016
(2)Core capital is computed as a percentage of adjusted total assets of $2.40 billion for consolidated and $2.39 billion for the Bank. Risk-based capital is computed as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets of $2.10$2.25 billion for consolidated and the Bank.

 

December 31, 2015
  Actual  Minimum Required for
Adequately Capitalized
  Minimum Required for Well
Capitalized
 
  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio  Amount  Ratio 
CET1 Capital (to Risk-Weighted Assets) (1)
Consolidated $218,297   10.71% $91,710   4.5%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $236,625   11.61% $91,678   4.5% $132,424   6.5%
                         
Tier 1 Capital (1)                        
Consolidated $253,297   11.46% $88,424   4.0%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $236,625   10.72% $88,267   4.0% $110,334   5.0%
                         
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)                     
Consolidated $253,297   12.43% $122,280   6.0%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $236,625   11.61% $122,237   6.0% $162,983   8.0%
                         
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) (1)                     
Consolidated $278,679   13.67% $163,040   8.0%  N/A   N/A 
First Federal $262,007   12.86% $162,983   8.0% $203,729   10.0%

(1)Core capital is computed as a percentage of adjusted total assets of $2.21 billion for consolidated and the Bank. Risk-based capital is computed as a percentage of total risk-weighted assets of $2.04 billion for consolidated and the Bank.

 6872 

 

Critical Accounting Policies

First Defiance has established various accounting policies which govern the application of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States in the preparation of its financial statements. The significant accounting policies of First Defiance are described in the footnotes to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. Certain accounting policies involve significant judgments and assumptions by management, which have a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets and liabilities; management considers such accounting policies to be critical accounting policies. Those policies which are identified and discussed in detail in the Company’s 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K include the Allowance for Loan Losses, Goodwill, and the Valuation of Mortgage Servicing Rights. There have been no material changes in assumptions or judgments relative to those critical policies during the first six months of 2016.

 

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

As discussed in detail in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, First Defiance’s ability to maximize net income is dependent on management’s ability to plan and control net interest income through management of the pricing and mix of assets and liabilities. Because a large portion of assets and liabilities of First Defiance are monetary in nature, changes in interest rates and monetary or fiscal policy affect its financial condition and can have significant impact on the net income of the Company. First Defiance does not use off-balance sheet derivatives to enhance its risk management, nor does it engage in trading activities beyond the sale of mortgage loans.

 

First Defiance monitors its exposure to interest rate risk on a monthly basis through simulation analysis that measures the impact changes in interest rates can have on net interest income. The simulation technique analyzes the effect of a presumed 100 basis point shift in interest rates (which is consistent with management’s estimate of the range of potential interest rate fluctuations) and takes into account prepayment speeds on amortizing financial instruments, loan and deposit volumes and rates, non-maturity deposit assumptions and capital requirements.

 

The table below presents, for the twelve months subsequent to June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015,2016, an estimate of the change in net interest income that would result from a gradual (ramp) and immediate (shock) change in interest rates, moving in a parallel fashion over the entire yield curve, relative to the measured base case scenario. Based on our net interest income simulation as of June 30, 2016,March 31, 2017, net interest income sensitivity to changes in interest rates for the twelve months subsequent to June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 was mainly neutral to a slighter asset sensitive position for the ramp and shock compared to the sensitivity profile for the twelve months subsequent to December 31, 2015. This is due in part to our strategy to grow longer term loans and fund that growth out of existing liquidity.2016.

 

69

Net Interest Income Sensitivity Profile            
 Impact on Future Annual Net Interest Income  Impact on Future Annual Net Interest Income 
(dollars in thousands) June 30, 2016  December 31, 2015  March 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Gradual Change in Interest Rates                                
+200 $1,376   1.74% $563   0.71% $2,395   2.38% $1,970   2.32%
+100  677   0.85%  215   0.27%  1,172   1.16%  972   1.14%
-100  (1,697)  -2.14%  (1,332)  -1.68%  (3,290)  -3.27%  (2,201)  -2.59%
                                
Immediate Change in Interest Rates                                
+200 $3,117   3.93% $1,660   2.09% $4,590   4.56% $4,236   4.99%
+100  1,535   1.94%  719   0.91%  2,111   2.10%  2,131   2.51%
-100  (3,026)  -3.82%  (2,605)  -3.28%  (6,401)  -6.36%  (4,132)  -4.87%

 

To analyze the impact of changes in interest rates in a more realistic manner, non-parallel interest rate scenarios are also simulated. These non-parallel interest rate scenarios indicate that net interest income may decrease from the base case scenario should the yield curve flatten or become inverted for a period of time.flatten. Conversely, if the yield curve should steepen or become inverted, net interest income may increase.

73

 

The results of all the simulation scenarios are within the board mandated guidelines as of June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017 except for the down 100 basis points over the first twelve months in a static and dynamic-shock balance sheet as well as in the down 100 basis points for a cumulative twenty-four months in a static and dynamic ramp balance sheet. Management is reviewing the board policy limits in all scenarios to determine if they are adequate and if so, any measures to be taken to bring the current results back into alignment with board guidelines.

 

In addition to the simulation analysis, First Defiance also uses an economic value of equity (“EVE”) analysis to measure risk in the balance sheet incorporating all cash flows over the estimated remaining life of all balance sheet positions. The EVE analysis generally calculates the net present value of First Federal’s assets and liabilities in rate shock environments that range from -400 basis points to +400 basis points. However, the likelihood of a decrease in rates beyond 100 basis points as of June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 was considered to be remoteunlikely given the current interest rate environment and, therefore, was not included in this analysis. The results of this analysis are reflected in the following tables for the sixthree months ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and the year-ended December 31, 2015.2016.

 

June 30, 2016
March 31, 2017March 31, 2017
Economic Value of Equity
Change in Rates $ Amount  $ Change  % Change  $ Amount  $ Change  % Change 
 (Dollars in Thousands)    (Dollars in Thousands)   
+400 bp  508,350   82,535   19.38%  696,836   109,870   18.72%
+ 300 bp  492,962   67,147   15.77%  675,346   88,380   15.06%
+ 200 bp  475,348   49,533   11.63%  650,486   63,520   10.82%
+ 100 bp  454,169   28,354   6.66%  621,338   34,372   5.86%
0 bp  425,815         586,966   -   - 
- 100 bp  391,610   (34,205)  (8.03)%  544,503   (42,463)  (7.23)%

 

December 31, 2015
December 31, 2016December 31, 2016
Economic Value of Equity
Change in Rates $ Amount  $ Change  % Change  $ Amount  $ Change  % Change 
 (Dollars in Thousands)    (Dollars in Thousands)   
+400 bp  509,640   56,545   12.48%  569,397   85,791   17.74%
+ 300 bp  499,038   45,946   10.14%  553,285   69,679   14.41%
+ 200 bp  486,652   33,558   7.41%  534,478   50,873   10.52%
+ 100 bp  471,332   18,237   4.03%  512,132   28,526   5.90%
0 bp  453,095   -   -   483,606   -   - 
- 100 bp  426,010   (27,085)  (5.98)%  429,266   (34,339)  (7.10)%

 

 7074 

 

 

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

 

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company's reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this report, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms. Disclosureforms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), Including those disclosure controls are alsoand procedures designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, as ours are designed to do, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

 

An evaluation was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of June 30, 2016.March 31, 2017. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

 

No changes occurred in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the quarter ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controlscontrol over financial reporting.

 

 7175 

 

 

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.

 

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

 

Neither First Defiance nor any of its subsidiaries is engaged in any legal proceedings of a material nature.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

There are no material changes from the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.2016.

 

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

 

(a)The Company had no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended June 30, 2016.

The Company has no unregistered sales of equity securities during the quarter ended March 31, 2017.

 

(b)Not applicable.

The following table provides information regarding First Defiance’s purchases of its common stock during the three-month period ended March 31, 2017:

(c)The following table provides information regarding First Defiance’s purchases of its common stock during the three-month period ended June 30, 2016:

 

Period Total Number
of
Shares
Purchased
  Average
Price Paid
Paid Per
Share
  Total Number
of Shares
Shares Purchased as
as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans or
or Programs
  Maximum Number of
Shares (or
Approximate Dollar
Value) that May Yet
Be
Purchased Under
the
Plans or Programs (1)
Programs(1)
 
Beginning Balance, April 1,December 31, 2016              377,500 
AprilJanuary 1 – April 30, 2016January 31, 2017  -  $-   -   377,500 
MayFebruary 1 – May 31, 2016February 28, 2017  -   -   -   377,500 
JuneMarch 1 – June 30, 2016March 31, 2017  -   -   -   377,500 
Total  -  $-   -   377,500 

 

(1)On January 29, 2016, the Company announced that its Board of Directors authorized another program for the repurchase of up to 5% of the outstanding common shares or 450,000 shares. There is no expiration date for the new repurchase program.

 

Item 3. Defaults upon Senior Securities

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

 

Not applicable.

 

 7276 

 

 

Item 5. Other Information

 

Not applicable.

 

Item 6. Exhibits

 

Exhibit 2.1Agreement and plan of merger, dated August 23, 2016, by and between First Defiance and Commercial Bancshares, Inc. (1)
Exhibit 2.2Amendment to Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 31, 2016, by and between First Defiance and Commercial Bancshares, Inc. (2)
Exhibit 3.1Articles of Incorporation of First Defiance (1)(3)
Exhibit 3.2Code of Regulations of First Defiance (1)(3)
Exhibit 3.3Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of First Defiance (2)(4)
Exhibit 31.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 31.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.1Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 32.2Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
Exhibit 101The following financial information from the Registrant's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 is formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL”): (i) Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Balance SheetStatements of Financial Condition at June 30, 2016March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2015,2016, (ii) Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Statements of Income for the Three and Six Months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 (iii) Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Three and Six Months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, (iv) Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Statements of Changes in Stockholder’Stockholders’ Equity for the SixThree Months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016, and 2015, (v) Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the SixThree Months ended June 30,March 31, 2017 and 2016 and 2015 and (vi) Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements.

 

(1)Incorporated herein by reference to the like numbered exhibit in Form 8-K filed August 24, 2016 (Film No. 161848221).
(2)Incorporated herein by reference to the like numbered exhibit in Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 (Film No. 17645447).
(3)Incorporated herein by reference to the like numbered exhibit in the Registrant’s Form S-1 (File No. 33-93354), filed on June 9, 1995.
(2)(4)Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 3 in Form 8-K filed on December 8, 2008 (Film No. 081236105).

 

 7377 

 

 

FIRST DEFIANCE FINANCIAL CORP.

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

 

 First Defiance Financial Corp.
 (Registrant)
   
Date:August 8, 2016May 10, 2017By:/s/ Donald P. Hileman
  Donald P. Hileman
  President and
Chief Executive Officer
   
Date:August 8, 2016May 10, 2017By:/s/ Kevin T. Thompson
  Kevin T. Thompson
  Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
  Chief Financial Officer

 

 7478